il | | 666 9 | TORONTO | | i | ERSITY | | | 61 00074 If f ened —— eee mpeerer Tt rel Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/friendlyarcticst0Ostefuoft 4 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC : i I] THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK - BOSTON + CHICAGO + DALLAS ATLANTA + SAN FRANCISCO MACMILLAN & CO., Liwitep LONDON - BOMBAY : CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Lt. TORONTO ' y i Pee 4 - \ 7 7 s ij E 1 : « on™) » > - se \ 1 ‘A : , ; , ai 3s : a) ’ THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC | THE STORY OF FIVE YEARS ‘IN POLAR REGIONS iby VILHJALMUR STEFANSSON AUTHOR OF ‘MY LIFE WITH THE ESKIMO’’ ILLUSTRATED a) mt OP gV ny, \\ Y \ ‘lew Pork : THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1921 All rights reserved PBINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Copyright, 1921, By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published November, 1921. Press of J. J. Little & Ives Company New York, U. S. A. PREFACE By VILHJALMUR STEFANSSON, WHO WAS COMMANDER OF THE EXPEDITION N reading the books of other explorers I have commonly found I tedious the long accounts of how their expeditions were organ- ized. My own inclination is to say nothing about the organiza- tion of the expedition that resulted in the story told in this volume, but many of my friends say that an account of the organization is both important and interesting. I shall compromise between their judgment and my own feelings by a short and general account where they advise a long and detailed one. The plans of this my third polar expedition developed in my mind gradually during the years 1908-12 while I was engaged in. the work of the second expedition. Our experience was then show- ing us day by day the friendliness and fruitfulness of those parts of the Arctic which are either inhabited by Eskimos or which are immediately adjacent to the Eskimo districts. But I was told by the Eskimos, and I had read the same before in geographies and works of exploration, that the vast unknown areas beyond the Eskimo frontier were devoid of animal life. The Eskimos agreed with the rest of us in thinking that no one could live in those regions except for brief periods, and then only by taking along enough supplies to last for the whole period of what must necessarily be a dash into and a hurried retreat out of a region of permanent desola- tion. But I am an anthropologist by profession, and the very reason for the beginning of my work in the North was a desire to learn whatever I could about the Eskimos. I had during these five or six years of continuous residence learned that the Eskimos resemble an uninstructed peasantry in possessing a large measure of native intelligence lying fallow, lacking opportunities of instruction and development. The ignorant classes of all countries have positive beliefs about many things, and a large number of these beliefs have no foundation in fact. I had long since learned that the Eskimos are honest and intelligent, but that they have a higher percentage Vv vi PREFACE of unfounded beliefs than any white people with whom I have associated. I could see no natural reason why the regions beyond the Eskimo frontier should be devoid of animal life. The fact that the Eskimos said so and the fact that geographies and encyclopedias continue to make the same assertion, meant little to me. Professionally, I- know the foundations of such assertions, and that encyclopedias do their full share in perpetuating the unfounded beliefs of our ancestors. I satisfied myself, so far as was possible while actually living in the Eskimo country, that the region beyond did not differ from the Eskimo country in any essential respect. I concluded the presumption to be that animal life could be found even in the very center of the icy area. This is a point, as explained elsewhere in this book, which lies about 400 miles away from the geographic North Pole in the unknown region north of Alaska. No one had been nearer to the center of the icy area than Peary when he visited the North Pole. Others had concluded from Peary’s evidence that since he had seen no animal life at the North Pole or between it and Greenland, the presumption was that for a greater reason there would be no animal life in more remote (because more distant from navigable waters) ice-covered areas in the region of maximum inac- cessibility.* My conclusion was that animal life had not been seen because it had not been looked for and because it existed under the ice where it would be inconspicuous. Hunting seals under thick polar ice resembles hunting as we commonly think of it less than it does pros- pecting. Many people had lived for long periods in Pennsylvania, tilling the soil successfully and considering themselves thoroughly familiar with all local conditions, and nevertheless these people were ignorant of the mineral oil contained in the earth below. Seal hunt- ing, as will appear in that part of the book where the methods are described, is analogous to prospecting for oil. No explorer had had that point of view, and it appeared to me that their failure to discover seals when they were not looking for them did not reflect on their intelligence any more than it reflects on the intelligence of Franklin that he lived for a long time in Pennsylvania and died in ignorance of even the possibility of the Rockefeller fortune and of the other things of more consequence that have hinged upon the discovery of oil in Pennsylvania. I already knew the methods of securing seals, and came south in 1912 firm in the belief that I could go into regions where Eskimos * See map showing “Pole of Relative Inaccessibility,” p. 8. PREFACE Vil had never been and into which Eskimos were unwilling to go because they believed them devoid of resources, and that I could in these regions travel indefinitely, carrying on scientific or other work and depending entirely on the resources of the country for food and fuel—food being the flesh of animals and the fuel their fat. Dr. Anderson and I had just finished, to the entire satisfaction of the American Museum of Natural History, a long polar expedi- tion under their auspices. On that expedition we had already done things which the Museum authorities had supposed to be exceedingly difficult or impossible, and we had done them without special effort, for we had found the conditions far more favorable than they had realized. The Museum authorities were, therefore, in a frame of mind to believe me when I told them that the entire polar area was as easy to make a living in as the district inhabited by the Eskimos, and they were the first to assent to our contention that we could travel where we liked, depending on the country for sustenance. After securing the support of Dr. Clark Wissler, curator of anthropology in the Museum (under whose direction I had carried out the expedition of 1908-12), I presented the case for the new expedition to Professor Henry Fairfield Osborn, the President of the Museum. He declined at first. to support the expedition, not because he lacked confidence in its fundamental principles but because the Museum was short of money and because they were already organizing another polar expedition—the Crocker Land Expedition, commanded by Donald B. MacMillan. They wanted me to wait a year or two till other work was off their hands and they were in a better position to support an enterprise of this sort. Waiting did not suit me at the time, and I accordingly went to the National Geographic Society, presenting my case to the Director, Mr. Gilbert Grosvenor. Later I presented the same case to the Board of Trustees, who were favorably impressed and with very little delay voted to give me $22,500. I now went back to the Museum and told them that, while I disliked severing my con- nection with the institution, I should have to do so unless they came forward at once to join the National Geographic Society in their support of the present enterprise. Hereupon the Museum made a special plea to one of its chief patrons and we soon had the further promise of $22,500. In Boston, the Harvard Travelers’ Club, of which I had been a member for many years, lent its moral support promptly to the expedition and later on decided to contribute $5,000. In Philadel- phia my old friend, Henry G. Bryant, who was then President of vill PREFACE the Geographical Society of Philadelphia, undertook to raise some money and presently secured from one wealthy patron a pledge to buy a ship for the expedition, and from another the promise that he would outfit the ship. Had these generous promises from Philadelphia come a week sooner than they did the expedition would doubtless have remained. under American auspices, for when you have a ship promised and also the outfitting of that ship, you have taken care of the major expenses of an expedition. The $50,000 secured from the three organizations mentioned above would have been amply sufficient to cover other expenses. However, a week before my receipt of Mr. Bryant’s letter I had gone to Canada to lay the situation before Sir Robert Borden, who was then Prime Minister. My first polar expedition, that of 1906-07, had been paid for jointly by the Universities of Harvard and Toronto. The money given me by Toronto University was actually contributed by Sir Edmund Walker, the President of the Canadian Bank of Commerce. As a result of this, Sir Edmund had continued his interest in my polar work. When I now went to Canada, Sir Edmund Walker lent me warm support in my representations at Ottawa. He did this by letter, while another eminent Canadian, Sir Edmund Osler, President of the Dominion Bank, gave me personal support, for he was then a member of the House of Commons. My second expedi- tion had been under the joint auspices of the American Museum of Natural History and the Geological Survey of Canada. The Director of the Survey, Mr. R. W. Brock, had therefore been in direct touch with my work for several years. He was at once willing to use his entire influence with the Government, and went with me to see the Prime Minister. My idea at the time was that the Canadian Government might join in the support of this expedition as they had already joined in the support of the previous one. The Prime Minister said, how- ever, that while he was inclined to support my plans, he felt them so important and so directly a concern of Canada that he would prefer that the Canadian Government should undertake the whole responsibility and the whole expense of the enterprise. I replied that I could scarcely make to the American scientific organizations the proposal of transfer, but suggested that in case he should open negotiations I would inform them of my entire willingness to sur- render the expedition to the Canadian Government. Sir Robert Borden then wrote letters to Professor Henry Fair- field Osborn, President of the American Museum of Natural His- PREFACE ib tory, and to Mr. Gilbert Grosvenor, the Director of the National Geographic Society, offering to take over the expedition. He assured them that the scientific program, as already outlined under their auspices, would be carried out by the Canadian Government, that, the expedition would be sent out that present year, and that the entire command of it would remain in my hands exactly as if the work had been under their auspices. In this letter and in the cor- respondence that followed between these American institutions and the Canadian Government, it was made clear that I was to remain the sole judge of the fitness of all men and all materials and that the scientific direction of the expedition should in every way remain in my hands. That this was made so explicit was due to the fore- thought of Mr. Grosvenor, who feared that some politician or other at Ottawa might try to influence the course of the expedition, thus interfering with its scientific value. It was in February, 1913, that the expedition was transferred to the Canadian Government. Before that time I had offered the position of second in command of the expedition to Dr. R. M. Anderson, who had accepted. No other man for that position had even occurred to me, for we had been friends since college days and had already carried out together successfully an expedition on which he had shown himself both admirable as a traveling companion and able and diligent as a field observer and scientific collector. A man whom I have admired for many years is Captain C. T. Pedersen, commonly known to his friends as Theodore Pedersen. I had known him in the Arctic since 1906. The winter of 1908-09 I visited him frequently when he was wintering in his schooner, the Challenge, in the “lagoon” at Point Barrow. We had talked over the possibility of an expedition of geographic discovery, where I should be in command while he was the sailing master. In my mind he was self-chosen for master of whatever ship I might have, just as Dr. Anderson was the obvious man for the position of second In command. Pedersen was now in San Francisco unoccupied. He at once accepted not only my offer to be commander of the ship, but under- took the task of selecting the best available vessel. A few years before this the whaling trade had come to a sudden stop through a drop in the price of whalebone, and there were ten or more whalers laid up in various ports on the Pacific coast that were supposed to be entirely suitable for further navigation in polar waters. Captain Pedersen informed me at once that the choice was between four ships —the Herman, Jeannette, Elvira and the Karluk. All these ships x PREFACE were known to me through association with them in polar waters, but I had not the intimate knowledge of them possessed by Captain Pedersen. I authorized the employment of expert ship inspectors, who soon reported that the Elvira was unsound, but that the other three ships were in good condition. They agreed with Captain Pedersen that the best of them was the Karluk. On the strength. of the backing secured from the American organizations I had already concluded the purchase of the Karluk before the expedition was transferred to the Canadian Government, whereupon she was resold at cost to the Government. With the authority and resources of a nation behind us, we now had the opportunity of organizing the most comprehensive polar expedition that ever sailed, for no expedition in history has been so fortunately situated. In some cases naval expeditions have been sent out by governments, but in those cases the purposes have not been primarily scientific. In expeditions that have been primarily scientific governments have sometimes taken a limited part and have granted lump sums of money. We had a more liberal backing, for Canada decided to stint us in nothing that might contribute to scientific success. : The selection of the scientific staff was the first consideration. The sciences to be investigated were anthropology (archeology, ethnology, somatology), biology (botany and zodlogy, both ter- restrial and marine), geography, geology, mineralogy, oceanography, terrestrial magnetism. In a scientific staff suitable to carry out investigations in all these sciences there are sure to be men who can accumulate knowledge in other departments also. In that sense such a polar expedition can make all knowledge its province. The sciences named turned out to be by no means the only ones that benefited by the work of our scientific staff. It appeared at once that, although we preferred Canadians, it was not possible to secure an adequate scientific staff in Canada. In general, we wanted men in whom university training was merely the foundation and who had after graduation settled upon one of these sciences as his life work. Half of our staff had academic training equivalent to that of a Doctor of Philosophy. We were able to secure only five out of our staff of fifteen in Canada. Even- tually it was made up as follows: from Canada 5, from Great Britain 3, from the United States 2, from Australia 1, from New Zealand 1, from Denmark 1, from Norway 1, and from France 1. The following is a partial list of the universities represented in _ the training of these men, partial because several of them had been PREFACE xl in two or more universities: Harvard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, McGill, Oxford, Queens, the Sorbonne, State Univer- sities of Iowa and North Dakota, Toronto, Universities of Edin- burgh and Glasgow, Yale, and technical schools in Norway, Den- mark and Australia. Four of the men had previously been on polar expeditions: Mackay and Murray with Shackleton, Johansen with Mylius Erichsen in Greenland, and Anderson with me. Mamen had been on a Norwegian surveying expedition to Spitsbergen. This list shows that we had to go all over the world to secure our scientific staff. Jenness had just returned to New Zealand from anthropological work in New Guinea, and Wilkins of Australia was in the West Indies. Both of these were secured by cable corre- spondence. Johansen, the Dane, was engaged in Washington, and Mamen, the Norwegian, in Canada. I made a trip to Europe which resulted in the engagement of Beuchat, Mackay, Murray and McKinlay. This European trip was partly to secure scientific men and partly to get equipment, especially in the field of oceanography. In this work I was greatly aided by Dr. W.S. Bruce, of the Scottish Ocean- ographical Laboratory, by Sir John Murray, and by the Prince of Monaco. While I was in Europe I received the first bad news of the expedi- tion, the resignation of Captain Pedersen. Some one had induced him to believe that he would have had to change his American citi- zenship for Canadian in order to be master of the Karluk. How ill- founded this belief was is best shown by the fact that we replaced him by Captain Bartlett who, although born in British territory, had become an American citizen and retained his citizenship throughout the expedition. Captain Bartlett had been master of the Roosevelt under Peary, and had extensive experience with ice navigation in Atlantic waters. Apart from the comprehensiveness of the scientific scope of the expedition and the large number of scientists, this expedition did not in its outfitting differ materially from that of the recent polar expeditions. The outfitting is, therefore, not worth describing. It was most effectively handled by the Canadian Navy Yard at Esquimalt, near Victoria, British Columbia. The direction of the expedition was under the Canadian Department of the Naval Service, and therefore at first under the Honorable D. J. Hazen, and later the Honorable C. C. Ballantyne. The expedition was directly under the Deputy Minister, the Hon- orable G. J. Desbarats, who through five years kept in personal xl PREFACE touch with every detail of it in spite of the cares and labors incident to the rapid expansion of the Department of the Naval Service under war conditions. The material outfitting was in charge of Mr. J. A. Wilson, who was then Director of Naval Stores. In Esquimalt the outfitting was handled by Mr. George Phillips, who accompanied us to Nome, and to whose personal care the expedition owes a great deal. The equipment of the expedition kept growing and growing under our hands, and for several reasons; especially that for the oceano- graphic work was more bulky and difficult to operate than we had at first realized. Furthermore, we had a scientific staff who were in the main inexperienced in polar matters, but who, nevertheless, had definite ideas of what outfit they must have in order to get along. In some part their ideas were justified by eventual experi- ence, but to a considerable degree our efforts to please them resulted in the hampering of the expedition. It was one of the few drawbacks of our fortunate situation of ample financial resources that we had continually to yield to the argument that after all we could buy and carry this or that if we only wanted to, and that all we would lose in case the-thing were not needed would be its money value and the cost of carriage. For reasons entirely apart from equipment I had decided to divide the expedition into two sections: one under the charge of Dr. Anderson to operate in the vicinity of Coronation Gulf; and the other under my immediate charge to strive towards the pole of inaccessibility and to have geography for its main objective where the southern branch carried forward more detailed and varied scientific studies. This plan necessitated two ships, the Karluk for the geographic work, and the Alaska to take the scientific men to Coronation Gulf. Later on our outfit grew so that we had to purchase the Mary Sachs in Nome to act as a tender to both sections of the expedition and incidentally to carry on oceanographic work under the command of our chief oceanographer, Murray. Later on the loss of vessels and the diversion of others to work not originally intended necessitated the purchase of further ships. These latter purchases are explained in the text of the narrative, for they form a part of the story in the field. I know myself fortunate, and suppose myself exceptionally fortunate in having many loyal and willing friends. Many of these have helped with this book and some have forbidden me to attach their names to any printed mention of their doing so. To mention PREFACE xill the others would seem invidious. Grateful as I am, I shall, therefore, refrain from attempting to express my gratitude to persons and shall merely make a formal acknowledgment to institutions. I am in the first place indebted in general to the Government of Canada and in particular to the Department of the Naval Service for allowing the use of photographs and other material gathered on the expedition. This was provided for in my original agreement with the Government when they assumed all obligations to me which had previously been entered into by the National Geographic Society and the American Museum of Natural History. The maps were made for the Department of the Naval Service by the Geodetic Survey of Canada. A few of the photographs used in this book were taken on my expedition of 1908-12. These are the property of the American Museum of Natural History and are used by their consent. The photographs of musk oxen under domes- tication are used by courtesy of the New York Zodlogical Society. Two photographs used in this volume are reproduced from my previous book, “My Life With the Eskimo,” because I had no new pictures which illustrated equally well certain points that had to be brought out. Most of the photographs used in this volume were taken either by myself or by George H. Wilkins, the official photographer of the expedition, who was with us by a special arrangement with the Gaumont Company of Great Britain. Some photographs of vegeta- tion and of insect life were taken by Frits Johansen, our botanist, entomologist and marine biologist. Through a defect in my records it is possible that two or three of the photographs were taken by other members. However that be, all the expedition photographs are used not by permission of the original takers, but in a few cases by permission of the Geological Survey of Canada, and in the majority of cases by permission of the Department of the Naval Service, whose property they are. It is possible that minor alterations will be made hereafter in the maps of the expedition. Those published in this volume should, therefore, not be considered final and authoritative. Those require- ments will be filled by the official maps of the Government to be issued from Ottawa probably during the year 1922. All technical -publications except certain preliminary reports published in technical journals will be issued by the Government as rapidly as possible. Such new place names as appear on the maps included in this book are those of men (and in one or two cases women) who have X1V PREFACE been directly concerned in polar exploration. Preference has. been given to members of the expedition. On the large scale maps as finally published by the Government every member will be com- memorated, but in this volume some names have had to be omitted because of the scale of the maps. Next after members of the expe- dition come polar explorers, and in particular those who have worked in the general region covered by the expedition. There are also the names of a few men who have been resident in the Far North for a long time, as whalers, traders, police, and the like. The most conspicuous features of the map have been named after those high officers in the Canadian Government who were directly instrumental in having this expedition sent north, or who have done something since then through acts while in office to promote polar exploration. FOREWORD By GitBerT Grosvenor, LL.D. President of the National Geographic Society UNDER WHOSE DIRECTION THE ORGANIZATION OF THE EXPEDITION WAS BEGUN October 18, 1921. The Macmillan Company, 64 Fifth Avenue, New York City. ‘¢@ AM sending you enclosed the introduction which you have | requested me to prepare. It may seem to you at first rather long, but I would ask you to note that my own part of it is very short. “Tt seemed to me very desirable that the tributes to Stefansson by Admiral Peary and General Greely should be incorporated in this introduction, particularly as this address by Admiral Peary was his last public appearance. Peary had been very sick for months, but I realized his friendship for Stefansson, and so I asked him if he would not come and present Stefansson to our audience. We (Peary and I) knew at the time that it was to be Peary’s last public appearance. I hope you can use his address and Greely’s, because these tributes were deliberately prepared by them and have great historical value. In fifty years these words of praise by Peary and Greely will be valued very highly, but they will be forgotten unless tied up in a book. They will mean more to the future than any words of mine. “Yours very truly, (Signed) “GrLBERT GROSVENOR.” When in the winter of 1913 Stefansson expressed a desire to resume his northern explorations and was seeking financial help, the Research Committee of the National Geographic Society, impressed XV XV1 FOREWORD by the quality of his earlier work, by his originality and resource- fulness, offered to subscribe $22,500 to his expedition. The Amer- ican Museum of Natural History generously duplicated this sub- scription. As the plans progressed, it became apparent that more funds would be needed for the expanding program, and Mr. Stefansson, with the approval of the above organizations, approached the Premier of Canada to ascertain if the Canadian Government desired to participate in the work. Sir Robert Borden immediately offered, on behalf of the Dominion, to assume the entire expense of the expedition if the National Geographic Society and the American Museum of Natural History would agree to relinquish their claims. On our cheerfully acceding to Sir Robert’s wish, because of our faith in Stefansson and our desire to see his important project adequately undertaken, we received the following very pleasant letter from the Canadian Premier: PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE, CANADA. “Orrawa, Ont., 2ist February, 1913. “Dear Sir: Mr. Stefansson has shown me your letter of the 11th instant, stating that you are willing to forego your claims to a share in his exploration of the northern waters of Canada, and to cancel the arrangements which you had so generously made to con- tribute towards the expenses of this undertaking, and I wish to thank you for your courtesy in withdrawing in favor of this Gov- ernment. “We are most appreciative of the valuable results obtained by Mr. Stefansson’s explorations in the northern part of the American continent, which have given valuable information as to this com- paratively unknown portion of the Dominion of Canada, and have to thank you for the part you took in assisting Mr. Stefansson in that work. The Government of Canada feels, however, with regard to the present exploration, that it would be more suitable if the expenses are borne by the Government more immediately interested, and if the expedition sails under the flag of the country which is to be explored. The Government is, however, desirous that the line of investigation begun by Mr. Stefansson and the members of your Association should be continued and would be glad of the FOREWORD Xvll scientific co-operation of your members so as to obtain the best results from this expedition. | Yours very truly, (Signed) “R. L. Borpen.” “GILBERT H. Grosvenor, Esa., “Director and Editor, “National Geographic Society, Washington, D. C.” While the National Geographic Society waived its claim, this act did not lessen our interest in Stefansson or the admiration with which we followed his five and a half years’ contest against obstacles insuperable to any other man. Our expectation of im- portant discoveries by his original methods were realized to such a gratifying extent that on his return the highest honor in the gift of the Society, the Hubbard Gold Medal, previously won by Peary and Amundsen, was unanimously awarded him by the Society’s Com- mittee on Research. Those members who were present when the medal was con- ferred will not soon forget that memorable meeting of the National Geographic Society, when Stefansson was presented to the mem- bers by the two foremost figures in American polar history—Peary, discoverer of the North Pole, and Greely, who had wrested from Great Britain thirty-seven years before (1882) the record for the Farthest North, held by British explorers for 300 years. Peary had been seriously sick for many months and really should not have risked the fatigue of addressing such a large audience, but in his eagerness to say a kind word of appreciation of his friend— Stefansson—he overrode his physician’s orders. The following tribute to Stefansson was Peary’s last public address; a few months later his heroic voice was still. ADMIRAL PEARY’S LAST PUBLIC APPEARANCE. “Fellow members of the National Geographic Society: “To-day we add another to the long list of Polar explorers, both north and south, whom our Society has welcomed and to whom our members have listened with absorbing interest. “Six years ago, in the parlor of a hotel in Rome, I said good-bye to a confident young friend of mine who was starting then for home in order to begin one of our latest Polar quests. I met him here to-day for the first time since then. How much has happened to xvill FOREWORD him in those six years I need not attempt to relate. Five and one- half years of those six this man has been there in the Arctic regions adding to the sum of the world’s knowledge. Five and one-half years! “Tt is not my intent to go into a résumé of his work. He is going to tell you that himself, but I can note very briefly that within that time Stefansson has added more than 100,000 square miles to the maps of that region—the greatest single addition made for years in Arctic regions. He has outlined three islands that were entirely unknown before, and his observations in other directions, the delin- eation of the continental shelf, filling in of unknown gaps in the Arctic archipelago, and his help in summing up our knowledge of those regions are in fact invaluable. “Stefansson is perhaps the last of the old school, the old régime of Arctic and Antarctic explorers, the worker with the dog and the sledge, among whom he easily holds a place in the first rank. Coming Polar explorers, both north and south, are quite likely to use mechanical means which have sprung into existence within the last few years. According to my own personal impressions—aerial flights; according to Stefansson, he would like to try his chances with a submarine; but whether it be aeroplane cr submarine, it will mean the end of the old-time method, with the dog and the sledge and man trudging alongside or behind them. “What Stefansson stands for is this: he has grasped the mean- ing of polar work and has pursued his task in the Arctic regions section by section. He has profited by experience piled upon expe- rience until he knows how to face and overcome every problem of the North. His method of work is to take the white man’s brains and intelligence and the white man’s persistence and will-power into the Arctic and supplement these forces with the woodcraft, or, I should say, polar-craft, of the Eskimo—the ability to live off the land itself, the ability to use every one of the few possibilities of those frozen regions—and concentrate on his work. “Stefansson has evolved a way to make himself absolutely self- sustaining. He could have lived in the Arctic fifteen and a half years just as easily as five and a half years. By combining great natural, physical and mental ability with hard, practical common sense, he has made an absolute record. “Stefansson has not only fought and overcome those ever-present contingencies of the Arctic region—cold and hunger, wet and star- vation, and all that goes with them—but he has fought and overcome sickness—first, typhoid, then pneumonia, and then pleurisy—up in FOREWORD X1x those forbidding regions, and then has been obliged to go by sled four hundred miles before finding the shelter of a hospital and the care of a physician.” GENERAL GREELY’S TRIBUTE TO STEFANSSON Major General Greely then paid the following memorable tribute to the Hubbard Gold Medalist: “We come together to welcome back Vilhjalmur Stefansson, whose published obituary you have read, but who insists with Mark’ Twain, that the account of his death has been greatly exaggerated. However, it told indirectly the tale of his dangers and hardships. “Stefansson has several unique Arctic records. His five and a half years is the world’s record for continuous Polar service. A pioneer in living on the game of the region, whether on the ice- covered sea or on the northern lands, he also initiated distant journeys on the ice-floes of an unknown sea, which carried him hundreds of miles from the nearest land. “The contributions of his expeditions are important and exten- sive. Besides the natural history and geologic knowledge, he has made inroads into the million square miles of unknown Arctic regions, the largest for many years. His hydrographic work is specially important, in surveys, and in magnetic declinations. His numerous soundings not only outline the continental shelf from Alaska to Prince Patrick Island, but also disclose the submarine mountains and valleys of the bed of Beaufort Sea. “From the unknown regions of Arctic land and sea he has with- drawn areas amounting to approximately 100,000 square miles. These discoveries comprise about 65,000 square miles of Beaufort Sea to the north of the Mackenzie basin, 10,000 square miles of the Arctic Ocean west of Prince Patrick Island, over 3,000 square miles along the northeast coast of Victoria Island, and over 15,000 square miles of land and sea to the northeast of Prince Patrick Island. In the last-named region three large and other small islands were discovered between latitude 73 degrees and 80.2 degrees north and between longitude 98 degrees west and 115 degrees west. “These new islands unquestionably fill in the last gap in the hitherto unknown seaward limits of the great Arctic archipelago to the north of the continent of America. “The spirit as well as the material results of exploration should be recognized. To-night the borderland of the White Sea is in the XxX FOREWORD thoughts and hearts of many, for there, in the gloom of Arctic twilight, and in the cold of a Polar winter, the heroic men of this great nation are enduring fearful hardships and periling their young lives to restore peace and give freedom to unfortunate Russia. “Recall that in the dawn of that nation’s history through this sea and the port of Archangel only could Russia be reached. More than three and a half centuries ago the first great maritime expedi- tion of England sailed to the White Sea, and Chancellor’s visit had potent results in the development of both England and Russia. “Of this great voyage Milton said: ‘It was an enterprise almost heroic were it not for gain.’ Stefansson’s explorations are untainted by motives of materialism. “Tn recognition both of the idealistic spirit and of the geographic importance of the discoveries made by Vilhjalmur Stefansson, the Board of Managers of the National Geographic Society unanimously direct me to present to him the Hubbard Medal. “Tt is to be added that the three survivors of the so-called Greely International Polar Expedition are too far advanced in years again to hazard Polar work; but as explorers of the nineteenth century who first wrested from England a record held for three hundred years—that of the farthest north—they wish to honor the explorer of the twentieth century who surpasses them. “Appreciative of Stefansson’s endurance of hardships, recogniz- ing his ability in devising new methods, his courage in testing such methods, and his standing as a typical Arctic explorer, the members of the Greely Expedition, who are about to die, salute him.” Thus those redoubtable Arctic heroes, Peary and Greely, paid tribute to Stefansson as a pioneer in a new direction; as one who had supported himself for years, not partially as his predecessors, but entirely on the resources of the Arctic regions. As we read the story of his years in the north, told in this inter- esting volume with that modesty in achievement which is so char- acteristic and so endearing in Stefansson, we see the Arctic through — | Stefansson’s eyes, no longer tragic and desolate, but converted by his adaptable spirit and clever creative hand to become fruitful and friendly—comfortable and almost jolly. INTRODUCTION By Rr. Hon. Sir Roserr Larrp Borpen, P.C., G.C.M.G., Prime Minister of Canada, UNDER WHOM THE EXPEDITION WAS CARRIED OUT. the Canadian Government with the view of obtaining assist- ance for an expedition to the Arctic regions in or adjacent to northern Canada. Support had been promised by the National Geographic Society and the American Museum of Natural History to the extent of fifty thousand dollars, but this was not enough to carry out in full the ambitious scientific and exploratory plans which he had formulated and he needed further support. I told Mr. Stefansson that while the public spirit, sympathy and co-opera- tion of these important institutions were highly appreciated, the Government preferred that Canada should assume entire respon- sibility for the Expedition, as any lands yet undiscovered in these northern regions should be added to Canadian territory. After obtaining the consent of the two Societies, he accepted my offer to place him in command of the Expedition. By an Order in Council approved on the 22d February, 1913, the general direction was placed under the Department of the Naval Service, and other im- portant departments were directed to co-operate. The history and general results of the Expedition thus organized, extending over a period of more than five years, have been set forth by Mr. Stefans- son in this volume. Those who have read Stefansson’s “My Life With the Eskimo” cannot fail to acknowledge its absorbing interest. Even more in- structive and illuminating is the story now related. Many pre- conceived ideas of these great northern territories must disappear forever. Except for the absence of trees, it is not unusual to find within the Arctic Circle landscapes not different in appearance from prairie or meadow. A member of the party was astonished to find a wide expanse of grass land where he had expected to meet an eternal desolation of icy barrenness. Many similar experiences are recorded by Stefansson and by others. Animal life is fairly XXi Byte in the winter of 1913 Vilhjalmur Stefansson approached XXil INTRODUCTION abundant on many portions of the land and nearly everywhere in the ocean. Birds and insects are in evidence; indeed, certain forms of insect life are so abundant that summer is almost unendurable. It seems paradoxical that in these Arctic regions the season for travel, for exploration and for social enjoyment should begin in mid-autumn and end early in spring. Winter night has no terrors for the Eskimo or for the white man of normal mental balance. The gayest social season among the Eskimos is in the winter months. During the war there was scarcity of fuel both in Europe and on this continent. In a leading London hotel so uncomfortable did I find my sitting-room in December, 1918, that I was constrained to seek a supply of firewood from the Canadian Corps, then working near Windsor. About that time Stefansson and his party, possessing an abundance of fuel, which the country supplied, were sitting in their shirt-sleeves, hundreds of miles within the Arctic Circle, com- fortably housed in an edifice which was constructed of snow blocks in less than three hours, and which with greater experience they could subsequently erect in not more than one hour. While we shivered in this temperate zone, there was vast comfort in the vicinity of the North Pole. War conditions necessitated short rations and restriction of diet not only in Europe but in America, while upon the ice floes of the Beaufort Sea abundant food of a healthful character was available without serious difficulty to expe- rienced explorers. There seems to be much truth in Stefansson’s observation that the cold of the Arctic deprives no one of either health or comfort if he understands conditions, realizes necessary precautions, and, making good use of his common sense, governs himself accordingly. But against the heat of tropical regions it is practically impossible to find any reasonable safeguard consistent with ordinary activity. Those accustomed to temperate zones would probably find life within the Arctic Circle more endurable and good health more assured than in the average lowlands at or near the equator. In certain tropical or semi-tropical climates, northern European races last for no more than three generations. There is no reason to believe that a like result would obtain in the far North. Although summer heat is sometimes quite oppressive within the Arctic Circle, its duration is comparatively short. Among many notable events of the Expedition one distinctive feature has especially impressed me. Before Stefansson, Dr. John Rae in 1848, and David Hanbury at the beginning of the present century, had lived off the country; Nansen and Johansen had lived INTRODUCTION Xxlll for a winter on walrus after their sled journey across the sea ice was over; Peary and some others also depended on game to supply part of the food of their crews in winter quarters and to eke out supplies that could be hauled on sledges. Dr. R. M. Anderson and Stefansson, between 1908 and 1912, put Rae’s methods to a thorough test and found them effective; they further proved that white men can easily master every art of the Eskimo that is useful for safe and comfortable existence in the Arctic. But the enterprise which began at Martin’s Point on the 22d March, 1914, and ended (so far as this aspect is concerned) at Banks Land on the 25th of the following June, was of a character wholly different. The exam- ination of the Beaufort Sea west of Banks and Prince Patrick Islands had been declared by Sir Clements Markham®* in his “Life of Admiral McClintock” to be “the great desideratum in Arctic geography.” There were reasons for believing that there might be islands in the Beaufort Sea and there were reasons against this hypothesis. In Markham’s opinion, knowledge of the Arctic regions would remain very incomplete until this area had been discovered and explored. Stefansson proposed to cross the Beaufort Sea on the ice, depending for food on the animal life which he believed to be existent in that sea. Against his belief all the forces of observa- tion and experience were arrayed. The explorers to whom I have alluded as “living off the country” wholly or in part, had done so on or near land where Eskimos were already living or where Eskimos thought they could live. All of them but Rae used Eskimo hunters to secure part or all of the game used. Stefansson was now strik- ing out into a region where no Eskimo had ever ventured and into which no Eskimo would accompany him unless he carried food, for they believed that no game could be found in that unknown waste. This very region has been referred to by Sir Clements Markham as “The Polar Ocean Without Life.” The testimony and experience of Nansen and Peary were quite unfavorable to the hypothesis which Stefansson had formed. Eskimos and whalers were equally strong in the opinion that his venture must be disastrous in any event and fatal if persisted in. Against all this Stefansson placed reliance on deductions founded upon premises that he regarded as unassailable. * Markham, himself a distinguished polar explorer, was for many years President of the Royal Geographical Society of Great Britain and was in intimate personal touch with every great polar explorer from Parry to Peary. He was therefore commonly considered a foremost authority on all polar matters. XX1V INTRODUCTION From the tropics to the Polar circles the amount of animal life per cubic unit of ocean water steadily increases. The great fisheries of the world are in the northern seas. Animal life is abundant not far from the verge of “The Polar Ocean Without Life.” Stefansson could not be convinced that its abundance did not extend to that ocean. Against the belief and traditions of the Eskimo, against the universal experience and strong opinion of the most eminent Arctic explorers, against the advice of the whalers, Stefansson maintained his thesis and, risking not only his reputation but his life, com- mitted himself to the ice of the Beaufort Sea. Two companions accompanied him, and there would have been more if necessary, although no Eskimo could be induced to embark upon a venture that he regarded as suicidal. For ninety-six days the leader and his comrades journeyed and drifted. There were a few days of discouragement when the anticipated signs of seal life were not observable, but then came the sure and triumphant vindication of a theory founded upon accurate knowledge, keen observation and sure deduction. Another secret had been wrested from the northern ocean. Stefansson had proved that in the farthest Arctic the sea supplied food even more abundantly than the land. For more than a year the world knew nothing of his success, and it was generally believed (not by those who knew him best), that he had expiated failure by death. As a result of the Expedition many thousands of square miles have been added to the territory of Canada, much interesting material of great scientific value has been secured, unknown areas of vast extent have been explored and many illusions with respect to Arctic conditions have been dissipated. Stefansson’s anticipations as to settlement and development in these northern regions are interesting. Who would venture to declare that they may not be justified as fully as his confidence in the Beaufort Sea? Men still living can remember that at first the great prairie provinces of Canada were regarded as unfit for human habitation. Once it was firmly held that railways could not be operated in Canada during the winter. Little more than a quarter of a century has elapsed since that theory prevailed with respect to street railways. At times tremendous forces of nature make the Arctic regions terrible and dangerous; but this is true of the ocean upon which hundreds of thousands spend their lives; it is not less true of voleanic mountains within whose shadow great cities have been built and rebuilt. In regions that have been repeatedly desolated by earthquakes, man still makes his habitation. INTRODUCTION XXV As a result of the Expedition it is quite possible that the ovibos (or musk ox) may be domesticated. At all events, the attempt should be made. So far as I am aware, no large mammal has been domesticated by man within the historic period. In “My Life With the Eskimo” and in this volume Stefansson has given us interesting and even fascinating pictures of Eskimo habits, beliefs ‘and traditions before they came into contact with white races. Their social organization, their conception of life, their ideas respecting the phenomena of nature and their practical adaptability to a difficult environment were probably similar to those which prevailed among our very remote ancestors. They spoke several dialects of a remarkably complex language; and in every- day life they used a vocabulary far exceeding that which we ordinarily employ. Through the accumulated experience of succes- sive generations they had acquired habits of life admirably suited to their surroundings. In many respects they were as children; in others, shrewdness itself. For them the age of magic still existed and without difficulty they accounted for the most miraculous or impossible events. Kindness, hospitality and many social virtues adorned their lives. But contact with the white races has been seldom beneficial to any such type. When a primeval civilization comes into contact with ours, the new wine is too strong for the old bottles. The results accomplished by this Expedition would have been impossible if Stefansson had been a man of less resource and courage. His commanding intellectual powers, remarkable faculty of observation, capacity for keen analysis of facts and conditions, splendid poise and balance, and immense physical strength and endurance made great results possible. Honors have been showered upon him by the representative societies of science; renowned polar explorers have paid him their warmest tribute; great universities have recognized by their highest degrees his contributions to scholarship and to science. The thanks and appreciation of the Canadian Government have been conveyed to him in a Minute of Council. But perhaps his greatest reward lies not in all this but in the love that has grown within him for this great friendly North which still calls him, the recollection of high endeavor successfully - achieved, the loyalty and devotion of comrades still present in memory. Ottawa, October, 1921. CONTENTS CHAPTER I I ron IV Af VI VII VIII ix x al xt XII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII Dab. XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII XXVIII Pox OKT XXXII SKIL XXXIV XXXV XXXVI XXXVII XXXVIII THE Four Staces in Potak EXPLORATION . . . ©. THe Norto TuHat Never Was Goop-By To “CiviLizATION” FoR Five Veins Siete oh ened Ne AIM MOREDS ORM ERAGEDY vs sa) ca Bey e.g) ote. ce ab ks THe Kargiuuk IN Frerters or Ice . . . «.. «. « THE Karituk DISAPPEARS . NEWS AND Puians . THE JOURNEY TO Genesee Patan A Pause at WINTER QUARTERS We Meer Dr. ANDERSON . Mipwinter TRAVEL AND Paepanarrony FOR Spane Work, “1914 THE CoLiinson Pornt DirricuLties SuHaLtL We Dare to Marcu NortH? Tue Ice Journey Bectns in MIsrorTUNE AND ierecarne THE First Firry MI.es . ; We Enter Upon tHE UNKNOWN ‘Oan F Comper WEATHER AND Berrer PRoGRESS We Buen THE Last Brince Beninp Us We Secure Our First Seat . Marooned ON AN ISLAND oF Ice . Summer Travet On Drirtine Frogs, 1914 . Lanp Arter Ninety-Turee Days on Drirtine Ice . Recorps, RetTrospects AND REFLECTIONS Summer Lire 1x Banks Isuanp . Ote anp I Go Hunting . We Discover THE Mary Sacus Tue AutumMN Hunt 1n Banks Isianp, 1914 Mipwinter TRAVEL AND Its Dirricu.tiEs . Sprina Traven, 1915 - MEN AND Bears As SeaL Hunters . We Compete THE Maprina or Prince Pane Taw : We Reach McCuintock’s FartTHest . Tue Discovery or New Lanp . ExpLorInc THE New Lanp : MELVILLE ISLAND AND McCuvre Strait . Historic Mercy Bay . : First Crossing or BanKs (cans 1915 WE Are “Rescurp” By Captain Louis Lane XXVIII XXVIl1 CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE XXXIX A Summer Visit To HerscHet ISLAND . 387 XL Ice NavIGATION AND WINTER QUARTERS . 397 XLI Autumn IN VicrortA ISLAND . , 405 XLII A Visrr to tHE CoppeR ESKIMOS. . . . =. 416 XLIIL Trovste Wirth tHE Copper ESKIMOS . . . . 430 XLIV Mipwinter Travers AND Puans, 1915-16 . 443 XLV A Near TracepY . 450 XLVI WtintTer PREPARATIONS 461 XLVII Esxrmo Tates FroM WINTER Gudea 466 XLVIII Tue Norru Coast or Banxs ISLAND . 472 XLIX Witxins LesAves THE ExpepiItTIon, 1916 487 L Into tHE UNKNowN BeEYOND THE RINGNES ISLANDS 509 LI Discovery or MertcHen IsLaAnp 517 LII Hassex Sounp anp Kina CHRISTIAN Tie 525 LITT Tue Discovery or LoucHrrp ISLAND . SY LIV We Discover Preopte AND A Coat MINE 562 LV We Fryp Bernier’s Depor Yat LVI Tue FourtH Mipwin ter, 1916-17 . 590 LVII Arriva or GonzALes WitH News . 598 LVIII Sprina Traveu, 1917 . 608 LIX In tHe Foorsteps or HARLIER Eeaviganes 623 LX Tue Tracevy or BERNARD AND THOMSEN . 646 LXI Tue Destruction or THE Mary Sacus 655 LXII Tue ApventTurES oF THE AuTUMN, 1917 663 LXIII Tue Rerurn Arter THE FirrH WINTER 673 APPENDIX DriFTING IN THE Beaurort Sea. By Storker T. Storkerson. Reprinted from MacLean’s Magazine, March 15 and April1,1920. . . 689 Tue Srory oF THE Karuuk, according to the account of Captain John R. Hadley, and the account of the rescue of the survivors by Burt M. McConnell 2) essue: 704 Tue Recion or MaxiImuM Te ecesernniry IN THE Deny By Volhiatentr Stefansson. Reprinted from The rane ae Review, Vol. IX, i) tember, 1920) INoseS ei a 731 THE Work OF THE SOUTHERN Shere OF THE Een We summary of the report of Dr. Rudolph M. Anderson in the Report of the Department of the Naval Service for the Fiscal Year ending March STOUT gas. et REO eee Ray Tc igre ia utensil ap eto mane ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PAGE Frontispiece On the Coppermine River: in 1910 the i losauitos: Bit Our Doge Arourid the Eyes Till the Eyes Swelled . . 16 There Are Hundreds of Species of Flowering Biante Pere Desist af) Species of Moths and Butterflies Found on the Most Northerly Islands in the World 17 A Meadow and Flowers of the Cotton Plant—Herschel Island, North Coast of Canada Captain Robert A. Bartlett 26 Dr. R. M. Anderson ia ey a et ee ee UE Most Northerly Clubhouse in America—Log Cabin Club, Nome The Most Northerly Citizen of Uncle Sam for Forty Years—Barrow, Alaska. Charles Brower, Fred Hopson 27 Most Northerly Theatre—Nome Most Northerly School, Post Office and Church, Barrow, Alaska Alaskan Reindeer Herd .. Mot Soleh i ets Makan) AF ec, cal > Sag ietgOw The Adaptability of the Skin Boat aaah Sd cn sa! iG IE on Music for an Outdoors Dance—Copper Eskimos | 40 Labrets Worn by Mackenzie Eskimos ae NNT Ke weet Mackenzie Family | Al Eskimo School Children at Barrow FN pe Did eae acme PT iWanter Quarters at (Collinson PBomt . <5 =... « «« « .». « 92 Wilkins Taking Movies } 93 Wilkins Showing Movies to Eskimos, Christmas, Collinson Point 7 The Sledge Trails Seaward from Martin Point | 149 Cooking Outdoors with Seal Fat J Fee te an ee Repairing a Broken Sled... te SC ee! PBT ic Mae tas The Camp on the Ice Before the Gale yoo. io) “er hy uisemnee toa er lioO Wilkins on the Shore Ice. . tg bol Nshs besos deel ghatamnoee cu Lol Constructing a Snowhouse—First BG Stats ws ges» del ate hg UReRME ap sliced Constructing a Snowhouse—Last Steps. . . . «© «© «© « © 175 Rigging the Sledboat .. ee PNT Oe “boom nee Une ote Launching the pibdbaak Crome: a Teen nding Meme «de OG Sealing Waters a O16 Fair Wind and Level Ice J ° ite yoy heehee ete) Aa Se Tent and Snow “Sastrugi” After a Blizzard O17 The Lead That Stopped Us XXIX XXX ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PAGE A Tent Ring \ 258 Broken Summer Ice Along the Coast The North Star Could Follow the Shore Water When a Larger Ship Could Not Move ... Uc Se a at te CEOS On Arrival at Kellett—Storker Bhankersdy Ole Andreasen a ae oe ae meat Building the Sodhouse at Cape Kellett . . 269 Meat for the Winter’s Food and Skins with Heads for Musewar Specimens) 280 Bringing Home a Load of Meat and Skins if Hauling Ashore the Emptied Sachs 281 Unloading at Kellett The Dogs Sleep in Their Harness While We Make aa we 314 A Snowhouse Will Support Almost Any Weight On a Day of No Shadows. . 315 Herring Gull—Sabine’s Gull Vellon Billed Leones Wealael Eee Parry's Spermophile.:)) ok! ss bso. ) os.) or puch eel ee emia A Young Owl on the Arctic Prairie. . 333 Lead Running Away from Land Showing TboRe Tee Gake That Would Serve as Bridge or Ferry | 352 Rocky Polar Coast—Summer Sandy Polar Coast—Summer } 353 Sandy Polar Coast—Spring—Showing Earth Heaped Up by Ice Pressure The Women Carry Anything Fragile Wrapped Up in eae 370 Summer Travel with Pack Dogs. Copper Eskimos ; A Summer Cache, Copper Eskimos } 97] A Summer Camp on the Prairie, Copper Eskimos The Harbor and Village, Herschel Island 398 Eskimo Boats and the Alaska, Herschel Island Mamayauk, Half-white Girl, Cape oer, 389 Copper Eskimo Girl In Midwinter Annie Thomsen Played Outdoors All Day . . . . 396 Guninana and LUI state: (Mrs. Lopez) i Andre Norem Copper Eskimo. Bowmen $5045 ie. s SP) oreo ot eo ero eae Drying Meat and Sealskins i 413 Eskimo Child Asleep in the Sun Copper Eskimo Spearing Fish \ 420 Some of the Trout Are Larger Than This Trying to Keep Cool on a Hot Arctic es 491 Typical Copper Eskimo Dog @apper Makimo: Mens’. ‘cae ceual ser viet iret ea) Ucar ole et geeeu urns 436 Copper Eskimo Women . 2 i Te RS NS aloe sake oan eS Star, Sachs and Alaska at oechel Island), i 446 Star at Bernard Harbor j ILLUSTRATIONS XXX] FACING PAGE The Smoking Cliffs—Franklin at The North Star Had Sunk It is Holiday Five Days Out of Seven Among the Copper Eskimos . Tattooing—Copper Eskimos . The Pressure of a Winter Gale Will Br ae Up ithe Heaviest Old lige : Ground Ice . ’ ; : Our Camp on Weicien island: Taking Possession of Meighen Island MacMuillan’s Record Found on Ellef Ringnes Island . Sledging in Summer ; Copper Eskimo Girls and Women . Musk Oxen Under Domestication—Bronx Bark: Ney Vor. A Polar Coast in Summer—Cape Parry Natkusiak and His Favorite Big Dog : Wilkins Tried to Use a Mask Against the Cold Emiu Was Fond of Small, Fast Dogs A Spring Evening in Polar Regions . McClure’s Record—Telling of the Discovery of ihe Northwest Pasdice Captain Bernard and His Sledgemaking Workshop The House at Bernard Harbor The Camp at Armstrong eau Eskimo Family at Our Table—Collinson cats Point Barrow Family—Storkerson’s Family The Burberry Tent—Inner Cover Martin Kilian and the Monument He Built at Storkerson’s Farthest The Old Burberry 'Tent—Double Covers This Lead Had Frozen Over . : Wilkins Taking Movies of Spring Wialie=“Barcow, Westen 3 Old Point Barrow Woman Half-grown Boy—Copper ane Eskimo Men and Women Seem to Enjoy Mending Clothes and Imple- ments A : 4 ~ MAPS “Pole of Inaccessibility” . Field of Work, Canadian Arctic apetitions 1914 3 Field of Work, Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1915 Field of Work, Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1916 . The Ringnes and Christian Island Group as Given in Shertnun’s “New Land,” 1904 The Ringnes and @hnstan Telaid Creu th Consents Made be the Canadian Arctic Expedition During 1915 and 1917 . Field of Work, Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1917 . Field of Work, Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913-1918 Key Map of Canadian Arctic Expedition \tn pocket at end of book 447 468 469 514 515 528 529 564 565 584 585 608 609 636 637 648 649 696 697 712 713 744 745 534 594 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC CHAPTER I THE FOUR STAGES IN POLAR EXPLORATION This chapter and the next are concerned with fundamental aspects of polar exploration and of the polar regions. They are put here rather than in an appendix because a grasp of general principles should help to make clear many things that might otherwise seem mexplicable in the narrative which follows. Anyone who does not care to be told in advance what polar exploration and the polar regions are like should skip to the be- ginning of the narrative proper in Chapter III. in diagrammatic order for the sake of easy comprehen- sion, exact truth frequently suffers in the interests of sim- plicity. This happens when we classify all polar exploration into four stages. Still, the view is more helpful than a conglomerate of facts and details where no philosophic scheme appears. There are many overlappings; there is occasional retrogression; and in some instances one stage of exploration will survive parallel to another. But, speaking generally, there are four great suc- cessive stages. When in prehistoric times the Scandinavians spread northward in Europe and when the Eskimos and other Mongol-like people moved north in Asia and America to occupy the rich hunting grounds along the polar shores, this was not exploration in the true sense. It would not be exploration in the true sense even if the story were completely known, for these people came so gradually in contact with their new environment that the quest and adventure and heroic en- deavor which in our minds are inseparably associated with explora- i | ’ YHEN attempt is made to arrange a large number of facts 2 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC tion must then have been lacking. To the explorer, as we think of him, the North seems terrible. But certainly it can have had no terrors for people who gradually occupied the land because they preferred it to other lands farther south. It is true that some his- torians and even a few anthropologists have assumed that the northern people were crowded into the North by stronger races that pressed upon them from the south. But in modern times close ob- servers of the polar races have found no evidence that they are now or have recently been suffering any pressure from the south, and there is no real ground for the assumption that they ever suffered such pressure. The northern people do not abhor the North. There have been extensive migrations from northern Norway, but these have never been to the tropics; or, if they have been, it has been for special reasons in restricted cases. The northern Norwegian, if he leaves his country, generally finds himself most at home and hap- piest in some similar climate, such as Manitoba or Alaska, where the winter is as cold as or colder than he ever knew it at home. For one who does not stop to think, it might be a source of wonder that runic stones carved by Scandinavians have been found on the coast of Greenland north of Upernivik at latitudes the attainment of which brought glory to John Davis. -But to the man who carved the stone and doubtless traveled far beyond it, the feat probably brought no local renown. His countrymen would find it no more remarkable that he could survive the cold of Greenland than a Zulu finds it that his neighbors can survive the heat of Africa. Of polar explorers as we know them, in distinction from the people who live contentedly in the North because they understand it, Davis and Hudson are typical. In the first period of polar exploration, men were universally in such fear of the North that they only made furtive incursions into it by ship in summer, re- turning south before autumn if they could. At that time it was believed that men of our race, softly nurtured in countries like Eng- land, either could not survive a polar winter or would find the hard- ships of doing so quite beyond any reward that could be expected. In the second stage, of which Edward Parry is typical, the polar winter was still dreadful, but a few men were found of such stern stuff that they were willing to brave its terrors. The battle with frost and storm at that time was a form of trench warfare. The hardy navigator penetrated as far north as might be by ship and then, figuratively speaking, dug himself in and waited for winter to pass, coming out of his hibernation in the spring. In that stage of exploration it was considered an achievement when Parry’s men, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 3 dragging a cart, were able to cross Melville Island in the early summer, a journey of only a few score miles. Sir John Ross, who, fortunately for the advancement of polar technique, was thrown in close association with the Eskimos, borrowed some Eskimo ideas but used them with the ineptitude of the novice. He employed sledges and made some use of dogs. It seems extraordinary that no explorer thought of going directly to the Eskimos and borrowing their system of life and travel in toto; that instead of learning native methods they found it necessary to discover for themselves the same principles of living and traveling which the Eskimos had discovered centuries before. Sir Leopold McClintock made notable advances over the explorers who had preceded him. Had he matched his ability not with his fellow explorers but with the Eskimos, his strides forward would have been incomparably more rapid. When McClintock commenced his work, a journey of a hundred miles in April or May was considered remarkable and was performed only at the cost of much suffering and hard labor, while at the end of his service, although it covered less than twenty years, journeys of a thousand miles were made without any greater strain upon health or risk to life than had been the case with the hundred- mile journeys. Yet the fear of the winter was still upon them all. Even Mc- Clintock did not commence his great journey from Melville to Prince Patrick Island until April. Although Nares as a heutenant had the benefit of service with McClintock and Mecham, the ex- pedition which he commanded in 1878 was no advance but actually a relapse into pre-McClintock methods. His statement that a com- mander should be censured who requires his men to travel in the Arctic before the month of April shows that not only in technique but in mental attitude towards the North he had failed to make any advance beyond McClintock. Then comes the third stage of polar exploration, of which Peary is typical, a greater step forward, it seems to me, than either of the preceding. The significance of this step can be made clear especially to those not personally familiar with arctic conditions by a truthful analogy. It is a matter of conjecture how the first man navigated a raft and how the first primitive sailor handled his bark. But, however it was and whenever it was, we can take it for granted that the earliest traveler by water paddled fearfully from bay to haven along prehistoric coasts, dreading nothing so much as the gales which could convert the placid surface of the waters he knew how to deal with into tumultuous seas, dangerous and even 4 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC fatal to his craft and himself. In that time no one thought of the wind as anything but hostile to the mariner. But the time came with the greater development of knowledge when the wind ceased to be hostile and became a friend. Then there was advance after advance until the sailor began to dread the calms which his fore- runners had courted, and to pray for the strong breezes that had been to his ancestors things to dread. Finally, the time came when. the winds carried clipper ships across the widest oceans, and it became almost inconceivable to the world how commerce could be carried forward without the aid of winds. As the primitive sailor feared the storm so the early arctic ex- plorer dreaded the winter. This dread gradually became less until there appeared the men who turned winter into a friend as the sailors had done with the gale. The leader among these was Peary, who saw that the cold should not be avoided but courted, and that the most successful journeys could be made in the winter, be- ginning in January or February, and should come to an end on any properly managed expedition by April, before the first thaw. A calm used to be ideal for paddling, and ideal for that it remains to this day, but paddling is not now a serious occupation. To Peary at work on the polar ice the warmth of summer was as welcome as a calm to Nelson at the hour of battle. In the first stage of exploration the polar winter was considered so dreadful that it could not be endured; in the second stage it was dreadful, though it could and had to be endured, and no work could be done till it was nearly over; in the third stage it was not only neither dreadful nor difficult to endure, but was the season when work could be done most easily, and was therefore preferable to summer. Apparently the limit of progress had been attained in this direction. But just as steam altered navigation and brought back the time when a calm is more agreeable and valuable than a strong breeze, so there was possible in arctic exploration an ad- vance which would again bring summer into a degree of favor, although it did not discard use of the winter cold as steam naviga- tion has discarded use of the wind. Explorers of the Peary type might no longer dread the winter, but there was another arctic condition which to them was still full of menace. Though traveling could be done and had to be done in winter, it was laborious, fraught with hardships, and had to be limited because of the difficulty of transporting enough food for men and dogs. It was universally conceived that an ice-covered arctic sea could supply neither suitable food nor suitable fuel in THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 5) adequate quantity for the support of traveling parties. For cen- turies Eskimos had been known to subsist on the shores of the polar sea, but it was believed that this was existing rather than living, and that the people were different, although enough like us to be as wretched as we believed we would have been under arctic temperature, arctic night, scarce and undesirable food, and other difficult living conditions. Now and then a traveler had come forward with reverse testimony that the Eskimos were healthy and happy, and that life by their method was as comfortable in the Arctic when you once become used to it as the life of a primitive tropical people was when you become used to that. The Eskimos themselves considered it impossible to make a living by their method anywhere except on land or on the ocean near land. The explorers all fell in with this view and so did geographers and others who theorized about it. Sir Clements Markham, himself an arctic explorer and over a long lifetime in close touch with polar progress, toward the end of his career in his “Life of Sir Leopold McClintock,” speaks of “the polar ocean with- out life’ (page 166), and at various times in other places referred to the “fact” that, while people could subsist on certain arctic lands, subsistence on the high sea was not possible. Similarly Nan- sen on his great journey over the ice after leaving the Fram killed his dogs one by one, feeding the dead to the living, because he did not conceive it possible to secure food for them. Even Peary, though he did not usually deliberately plan to kill his dogs, says in his last book, “The North Pole,” that he expected to drive them so hard and feed them so little that sixty per cent. of them would die on the journey. But it is obvious that were this opinion of the Eskimos and the explorers wrong, then a further advance in the method of polar exploration was still possible, and without the aid of new mechanical invention. The men of early time had shown that travel on the ice is possible in summer, although difficult and disagreeable. The men of the Peary stage had shown that traveling on the sea ice in winter is far easier and more agreeable than traveling in sum- mer and that the only limitation to the length of journey was through the difficulty of transporting enough food. Now if it could - be demonstrated that food suitable to sustain indefinitely both men and dogs could be secured anywhere on the polar sea, then obviously journeys over the ice would cease to be limited either in time or distance. Any part of the polar sea would then become accessible to whoever was willing to undergo the supposed hard- 6 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC ships of living on meat exclusively, using nothing but blubber for fuel, and remaining separated from other human beings than his own traveling companions for a period of years. To demonstrate the feasibility of this and thereby to bring in the fourth stage of polar exploration, was the main task of our expedition. From my point of view, at least, any discoveries which might be made through the application of this method were second-: ary to the establishment of the method itself. For, with the method once established, anyone could go out and make the discoveries. When the world was once known to be round, there was no difficulty in finding many navigators to sail around it. When the polar re- gions are once understood to be friendly and fruitful, men will quickly and easily penetrate their deepest recesses. I am one of those who, knowing both Peary and his methods, never had any doubt that he reached the North Pole on April 6, 1909. I have, however, been sometimes impatient of discussion as to whether he reached it or not. The all-important consideration is that he developed a method by which anyone could reach the Pole or any other point no farther removed from the nearest land than five or six hundred miles, which he thought (and I agree) was about the limit as to distance of the dog-sledge system of trans- portation. If you once concede that the Wright brothers invented the aeroplane and inaugurated the era of air navigation which is now revolutionizing our civilization, both in peace and in war, then it becomes of little interest whether Orville Wright can fly as high or as far or steer an aeroplane as successfully as some one else. Those are accomplishments by no means small, but not in a class with the pioneer work that made all the rest possible. When Peary was able to reach the Pole he laid down a system by which anyone of good health, sound judgment and a reasonable appren- ticeship in polar work can reach it, starting from the same base on the north coast of Grant Land. With that point understood, any attempted dis- paragement of Peary by suggesting that he was himself too old to get to the Pole (a foolish suggestion, anyway) would be like trying to cast slurs on Watt or Stephenson by pointing out that neither of them drove a loco- motive at a hundred miles per hour. , CHAPTER II THE NORTH THAT NEVER WAS well known. With minor modifications, they are as fol- lows: The Arctic is a roughly circular or exactly circular area “at the top of the world,” with the Pole for a center. The Pole is the point on the northern hemisphere most difficult of all places to get to. Formerly explorers went north to find a short route from Europe to China or in search of gold; but later they strove and still are striving for the Pole itself. The Northwest Passage was found by the Franklin Expedition in the middle of the nineteenth century (some think it was found by Amundsen in 1905), and the Pole was attained by Peary in 1909. The Northwest Passage has proved of no immediate commercial value and will therefore forever remain worthless. The Pole has been attained, and the supreme achievement of the Arctic thus made a finality. Why should any one want to explore the Arctic further? The land up there is all covered with eternal ice; there is everlasting winter with intense cold; and the corollary of the everlastingness of the winter is the absence of summer and the lack of vegetation. The country, whether land or sea, is a lifeless waste of eternal silence. The stars look down with a cruel glitter, and the depress- ing effect of the winter darkness upon the spirit of man is heavy beyond words. On the fringes of this desolation live the Eskimos, the filthiest and most benighted people on earth, pushed there by more powerful nations farther south, and eking out a miserable existence amidst hardship. This, with individual modifications, is the current picture of the Arctic, and this is substantially what we have to unlearn before we can read in a true light any story of arctic exploration. According to their varied temperaments, those who hold such views of the North are forced to one or another semi-irrational ex- planation of why explorers still go there. Some think it is because of an insatiable desire, mysteriously implanted in our race, to throw ourselves against obstacles, to brave dangers and suffer heroic i 4 he salient characteristics of the arctic regions are only too 8 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC deaths—a sort of human counterpart of the impulse which leads the lemming to march in thousands into the ocean to be drowned. Other conceptions vary upward and upward, until we come to the noble view that the explorer is the scientist urged by a thirst for knowledge, who struggles on through the arctic night with the same spirit that keeps the astronomer at his telescope, neither of them thinking of material profit or necessarily of glory or even of the approbation of his fellows. There is much of the adventurer in some explorers and much of the scientist in others; in a few the qualities are happily blended. But in order to understand the Arctic explorer and his work we must understand the Arctic as it really is. It might seem that the easiest way to do this would be to learn more about it. A far easier way is to forget what we think we already know. The Arctic as pictured in the first two paragraphs of this chapter and in the minds of most of our contemporaries, does not exist. It may be a pity to destroy the illusion, for the world is getting daily poorer in romance. Elves and fairies no longer dance in the woods, and it appears a sort of vandalism to destroy the glamorous and heroic North by too intimate knowledge, as the Greeks drove their gods off Olympus through the-perverse scaling of the mountain to its top. Our first close look at the Arctic shows us that our central “fact,” the preéminent inaccessibility of the Pole, is not a fact at all. The portion difficult of access is not circular with the Pole at its center, but of a highly irregular shape with the Pole lying well towards one of the edges. The region in the north difficult of access is an ocean more or less covered with ice. The inaccessibility of any part of this area is due to the fact that there is too much ice for ships to sail as they sail on the Atlantic, and not enough for men to walk safely and easily as they walk on land. There is no single huge expanse of level ice: there are instead innumerable floes or cakes of ice. These are pressed against each other under the stress of wind and current, their edges crumble under the terrific strain, and ice pressure ridges are formed resembling mountain ranges in contour, though seldom more than fifty or sixty feet in height. If the floes are extensive they break up under heavy pressure not only along their edges but at various points within the general field, buckling till they crack and forming new floe edges with new pres- sure ridges. Then when the strains slacken or become unequal the floes, instead of hugging each other, spread apart with water lanes between. This happens even in midwinter with the temperature at ARCTIC OCEAN THE GEOGR. REVIEW, Sepr.1920__15 : : 2 Lee The entire area outside of the heavy solid line may be called the “Zone of Approach by Ship”; the area within it the “Zone of Man-and-Dog Travel.” The stippled portion of the latter is the “Zone of Comparative Inaccessibility.” The distance between the isochronic lines is five days dog-sledge travel, or 60 miles. Incidentally the map shows the superiority of Peary’s position of 1908 over all others on land as a base for a dash aimed at the point of latitude 90° N. It is also favorably situated for an attack on the “Pole of Inaccessibility,” which is only 200 miles farther away from Peary’s base than the North Pole. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 9 its lowest. There is never a time when one can travel on foot or by dog sledge over the ice without meeting this handicap of open water, and open water is more serious than the deepest masses of the softest snow or the most craggy and slippery ice ridges. All this being so, the North Pole might still be at the center of this floating conglomeration of ice. So it would were it not for a fundamental difference between the Atlantic and the Pacific oceans. In each of these there is a great stream of warm water rushing northward. In the Atlantic we call it the Gulf Stream and in the Pacific we speak of the Japan Current. The two oceans differ fundamentally, however, in that, no matter how hard it tries, the Japan Current is unable to penetrate to the polar sea in its quarter. It is fenced out by the chain of the Aleutian Islands and by Bering Strait, where Alaska and Siberia almost lock horns. The Strait is thirty-six miles across, scarcely wider than the chan- nel between Great Britain and France, and besides being narrow and shallow it has two islands in the middie. The Japan Current, therefore, instead of reaching the Alaskan arctic with its warmth, spends its heat upon the air and water of the North Pacific, with only a little and practically imperceptible amount of slightly warmed water finding its way to the north ccast of Alaska. In the Atlantic the condition is different. The waters warmed by the Gulf Stream spread northward through the wide and deep gap between Norway and Greenland, splitting on Iceland with such effect that although Iceland is arctic in name and subarctic in latitude it is temperate in weather. The climate of Iceland at sea level does not differ materially from that of Scotland. There are high mountains and these are ice-capped. It is a commonplace of geology that the Scotch mountains would also be ice-capped were they as high as those of Iceland. At sea level in Iceland the temper- ature in some winters never falls to zero Fahrenheit, and fifteen below is more often experienced in the region near New York City than in Reykjavik, the capital of Iceland. For the last ten years the mean temperature of January in Reykjavik has been thirty- three degrees above zero, or about that of Milan in Italy. Nor does the Gulf Stream stop at Iceland. Its waters creep north into the polar ocean and melt away the ice that otherwise would be there, so that the Scotch whalers in an ordinary season can sail from six — to seven hundred miles closer to the Pole on the Atlantic side than the American whalers on the Pacific side. There is another place where a ship can steam about as close to the Pole as it can through the breach made by the Gulf Stream. 10 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC This is the passage which Peary has called the “American route to the Pole,” the narrow series of straits between Greenland and Ellesmere Land. There is frequently a current running south through this strait. The huge masses of ice from the polar ocean to the north would like to accompany this current south into the strait, but in their eagerness they crowd each other in its northern mouth, like a mob of people jammed in the narrow exit of a build- ing. While the ice cakes on the surface are jammed and only some fragments get through, the water underneath them flows south freely, so that in many seasons those straits are blue water in late summer, though the latitude is higher than that which ships can navigate anywhere else. It was through this circumstance that Peary was able to get a ship up the north coast of Grant Land, less than five hundred miles from the Pole. It is a commonplace of arctic lore and indeed self-evident that so long as sledges hauled by dogs, men or motors are used for arctic exploration, that point will be most difficult to reach which is farthest away from the ultimate goal of a ship where the sledge traveling has to begin. If this ultimate ship base is 450 miles from the Pole in Grant Land, or Franz Josef Land, about 800 miles at Cape Chelyuskin on the north tip of Siberia, and over 1,100 miles near Point Barrow on the north tip of Alaska, it becomes evident that the point in the Arctic hardest to get at, which we may call the “Pole of Inaccessibility,’ by no means coincides with the North Pole but lies about four hundred miles away from it in the direction towards Alaska. This coincided roughly with the center of the unexplored area in the polar regions when we sailed north, an area of over a million square miles then, and still to be reckoned as at least seven hundred thousand square miles. The region is unex- plored, partly through its inherent inaccessibility, but partly alse for two other reasons. The first of these reasons is that the civilization of our time has developed on the two shores of the Atlantic, and that the sailors of this ocean have been the chief explorers of the North. It was natural they should attack the problem along the frontier nearest home, and that is one reason why knowledge has advanced into the inaccessible area more rapidly from the Atlantic than from the Pacific side. Incidentally, those who went north with a desire to find a way from their homes to the Indies naturally struck into the unexplored area on a promising route to attain this purpose, which again was the frontier nearest home. But a second reason has been the glamour of the search for the THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 11 Pole. Even when you realize that it is comparatively easy of access, it is still ninety degrees away from the equator, and unique. The sentiment surrounding the idea of uniqueness might have been weakened had people realized that as a known mathematical point the North Pole was obliged to be comparatively accessible. But that bit of knowledge has succeeded in maintaining itself as the exclusive property of a few specialists, and the world in general has imagined the North Pole to be to the Arctic what the mountain top is to the mountain. That analogy is true when applied to the Pole of Inaccessibility but not when applied to the geographic North Pole. But false views when strongly held are as powerful in their effect upon human conduct as any true views can be, and this has been another reason why men brought up on the shores of the At- lantic have striven into the polar area with the latitude of 90° North as their goal, but with the practical result of progressively uncov- ering vast areas that lay between. In the process of removing the imaginary Arctic from our minds, we come to the proposition that all land in the far north is covered with eternal ice. Permanent ice on land is another name for a glacier. When we stop to think of it, glaciers exist in any part of the world with the proper combination of high altitude and heavy precipitation. Mount Kenia in Africa, the top of which is considered to be about seven miles from the equator, has “eternal ice” upon it, a glacier of considerable area. There are known to be huge glaciers in sub- tropical Asia and lesser ones in South America. They are eternal on the mountain-tops of Mexico; in California they come a little nearer sea level, as they do in Switzerland. They come lower yet in the State of Washington, not primarily because it is farther north but chiefly because of the heavier precipitation. British Columbia is the warmest province in all Canada, and yet it contains three-quarters of all the glaciers of continental Canada, again be- cause of the heavy precipitation. The south coast of Alaska has a climate not very different from that of British Columbia or of Scotland, though somewhat more rainy than Scotland. A compara- tively warm country, southern Alaska contains huge glaciers which in some instances reach to the ocean and break off, forming icebergs that float away to be rapidly melted by the warm waters of the Pacific. But if you travel seven or eight hundred miles overland from the glacier-infested south coast northward you come to the _ prairies bordering the Alaskan north coast. Here is a comparatively - cold climate; but on the great triangular coastal plain of fifty 12 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC thousand square miles there are no mountains, consequently no gla- ciers. Geologists tell us that a few millenniums ago there was a sheet of ice covering England in Europe and New England in America. At that time what are now the cities of New York and London were covered by an ice sheet, but there was no ice sheet covering the low plains of northern Alaska, and there never has been since.* The explanation is that northern Alaska is low, flat land with a precipitation so light that the snow which falls in winter is all thawed away in the spring. These being the facts, it seems strange at first that people should so universally have the idea that the lands of the far north are covered with glaciers. The explanation is simple. There is one land in the north that is covered with glaciers and from it all the rest of the north has been pictured by analogy. Greenland is a mass of high mountains in a region of precipitation so heavy that the heat of summer does not suffice to thaw all the accumulated snows of winter, so they change into glacier ice that flows down the valleys into the sea and breaks off into the icebergs that are the delight and dread of the transatlantic tourist. We thus have in fact as well as in the hymn-book ‘“Greenland’s icy mountains.” And Greenland is close to the big modern centers of population. In the days before Standard Oil became the light of the world the whale and seal fisheries were profitable, and men from nearly every seaboard town were engaged in them. They brought home stories of the ice of Greenland and some of them wrote books about it. In more recent years about every other owner of a yacht has more or less timorously approached Greenland, near enough at least to see the ice and to talk and write about it. And because Greenland has been truthfully described as a land mainly ice-covered, we have thoughtlessly assumed that all northern lands are similarly ice- covered. Some glaciers, although much smaller, exist in Franz Josef Land and in Spitsbergen, and there are glaciers of consider- able size in Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg Islands, and lesser ones in Baffin Island. But when you get west of that, the great archipelago that stretches northward from Canada towards the Pole is quite free of them and so is all the Canadian mainland along the polar sea and southward to the arctic circle and beyond, except for some high valleys and peaks in the Rockies. But even after making it clear that Greenland is a peculiar island and the only one having an ice cap, and after explaining *See “Canning River Region of Northern Alaska,” by Ernest de Koven Leffingwell, published by the U. S. Geological Survey, 1919. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 13 further that the glaciers of Baffin Island are comparable in size to the glaciers of British Columbia, we may meet the objection, “But surely the land is covered with snow all summer.” This, of course, cannot be the case. If it were, a glacier would gradually develop. As a matter of fact, the snowfall in the Canadian arctic islands and on the north coast of Canada and Alaska is less than half and in many places less than quarter of what it is, for stance, in Montreal or Petrograd or the hills back of Christiania. It is less than in Chicago, Warsaw, northeast Germany or the High- lands of Scotland. The amount is difficult to estimate exactly for the snow is so frequently disturbed by the wind, but in all probabil- ity the typical arctic snowfall would not, if translated into water, amount to more than four or at the most six inches per year, where the snowfall in certain inhabited portions of Europe and America amounts to ten times that much. Sverdrup estimates the total annual snowfall of Ellesmere Island, the most northerly island yet found in the world, at about one-tenth of the weather bureau esti- mate for the annual snowfall of St. Louis, Missouri. Most of what little snow falls in the far North is soon swept by the wind into gullies and into the lee of hills, so that from seventy-five to ninety per cent. of the surface of arctic land is comparatively free from snow at all seasons. What we mean by “comparatively free” is that a pebble the size of a plum lying on the ground would have more than an even chance of being partly visible above the snow. Closely allied to the idea that all land in the north is covered with eternal ice and snow is the one that the climate is an ever- lasting winter of intense cold. Whether this is true is largely a matter of definition. A person brought up in Manitoba or Mon- tana would be inclined to think that there is no winter in the south of England, while a native of Sicily or India might consider the climate of England all winter. We might begin by defining sum- mer, and defining it as that season when ponds are unfrozen and the small rivers flow ice-free to the sea. This season may be five months long, as it is on the arctic circle north of Great Bear Lake in Canada; four months, as in Victoria Island; three months, as in Melville Island; or even shorter, as in the islands discovered by us to the north. But there is always a summer, the presence of birds, with the hum of bees and the buzz of insects more unpleasant and with green grass and flowers. The question of whether the arctic winter is intensely cold is also a matter of definition. Temperature is a field where every- thing is comparative, even though you concede to the thermometric 14 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC scale an absolute value. The Canadian government has for more than twenty years maintained a weather observatory at Herschel Island on the north coast of Canada, about two hundred miles beyond the arctic circle, and during that time the lowest tempera- ture recorded has been 54° below zero Fahrenheit. This may seem cold, and indeed is cold in comparison with Zululand or England. But it is not cold when compared with certain permanently inhabited countries. Traveling south from Herschel Island less than two hundred miles you come to Fort Macpherson, for a long time the most northerly trading post of the Hudson’s Bay Company, and here the temperature some winters drops as low as 68° below zero. This is because, although going south, you are getting away from the moderating effect of the huge amount of unfrozen and compara- tively warm water that underlies the ice of the polar sea and that forms a great radiator which prevents the temperature from drop- ping exceedingly low. Traveling again south from Fort Macpherson several hundred miles you come to the city of Dawson, the capital of the Yukon Territory. This is a great mining center, although it no longer has a population of forty thousand people as in the days of its highest prosperity. Dawson is an ordinary town with buildings steam-heated and electrically lighted, and with all the ordinary activities of a place of four or five thousand population. There are shops where people buy and sell as they do in other climes, there are churches with people going to church (a few), and there are little children toddling to school, all without any greater apparent discomfort, though the temperature sometimes drops to 65° below zero, than you find in France or in North Caro- lina where the temperature goes a little below freezing. More hardship is felt, more complaint expressed, and there is more inter- ference with the ordinary routine of life when snow falls in Paris than when Dawson is at its coldest. As you go south along the Rocky Mountains from Dawson you get farther from the great temperature equalizer, the ocean, as you get nearer the equator. A thousand miles south, in northern Mon- tana, the United States Weather Bureau gives the same minimum figure for winter cold near Havre that the Canadian Weather | Bureau does near Dawson—68° below zero. We know from ob- servation it is never colder than 54° below zero on the north coast | of North America at sea level: we know theoretically that it can- not ever get much colder than 60° below at the North Pole which } lies in a deep ocean. It is, then, at Havre, Montana, fourteen de- | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 15 grees colder than on the north coast of North America and ten degrees colder than at the North Pole. Near the great city of Win- nipeg in Manitoba the weather bureau shows lower temperatures than for the north coast of Canada. So if you happen to be living in northern Montana or southern Manitoba and want to go polar exploring, it would seem you might leave behind a few clothes. I once said substantially this in a lecture in Kalispell, Montana, whereupon some one in the audience took me to task for running down Montana. But the merits of Montana are securely estab- lished, I told him. A friend of mine has a cattle ranch near Havre where steers do well running out all winter. I was not, therefore, running down Montana by the comparison but praising the North Pole. The cold pole of the northern hemisphere, far from coinciding with'the North Pole, is believed to be on the continent of Asia north of Irkutsk, where the temperature is said occasionally to fall to 90° below zero. And that is a settled country, the inhabitants of which probably do not complain any more about the climate than do those of London or New York. A corollary to everlasting cold in the north is absence of summer heat. It is not easy to say which one of the common notions about the North is the least true, but it is hard to see how any idea can be more wrong than this one. I spent the summer of 1910 from fifty to seventy-five miles north of the arctic circle in Canada, northeast of Great Bear Lake, and for six weeks the temperature rose to the vicinity of 90° in the shade nearly every day. Neither did it fall low at night, for in that region the sun does not set and there is no respite through the cooling darkness. The sun beat down on us from a cloudless sky as it continued its monotonous circling, and all of my party agreed we had never in our experience suffered as much from cold as we suffered from heat that summer. The distress was augmented by the unbelievable numbers of pests of the insect world—mos- quitoes, sandflies, horseflies, and so on. No one who has not been in the Arctic, or near it, has any idea what mosquitoes may be like. I have found it wise not to even try to explain, for although people are willing to believe any horror of the North if it centers around cold and ice, they lose faith in your responsibility if you try to tell them the truth about the northern mosquito.* Every summer the United States Weather Bureau reports tem- *See “The Arctic Prairies,” by Ernest Thompson Seton, p. 63. 16 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC perature above 90° in the shade at Fort Yukon, in Alaska, four miles north of the arctic circle. The maximum recorded there so far is 100° in the shade. Still following the typical view of the far north we come to the question of vegetation. Even those who would make the off- hand statement that the land is covered with eternal ice and snow would, if you pressed them, admit that they had heard of vegeta- tion in the North. You would, however, find that in their minds the idea of vegetation was coupled with such adjectives as “humble,” “stunted,” “clinging,” and more specifically they would be of opinion that what vegetation there is must be mosses and lichens. Should you succeed in reminding them that they have read or heard of arctic flowers, they would think of these as an exception. Yet Sir Clements Markham in his appendix to the “Life of Admiral McClintock,” points out that he knows of the existence of 762 species of arctic flowering plants and only 332 species of mosses, 250 of lichens and 28 of ferns. Similarly Dr. Elmer Ek- blaw, the American botanist, gathered over 120 different species of flowering plants in one vicinity six or seven hundred miles north of the arctic circle. And these are not flowering plants that are strange to us, but they include such common forms as saxifrage, poppy, Alpine chickweed, bluegrass, heather, mountain avens, sedge, arnica, cat’s-paw, reed-bent grass, blue-bell, sixteen species of cress, dandelion, timothy, scouring rushes, ferns and edible mush- rooms. Even while we realize that the number of species of flowering plants in the Arctic is far greater than the non-flowering, we might still believe that the non-flowering are comparatively luxuriant and conspicuous and the flowering plants shrinking and rare. In general this is the opposite of the truth. In special cases it may be that, through scarcity or absence of soil, lichens and mosses prevail locally, for the peculiarity of lichens especially is that they manage to live even on the surface of naked rocks. But whenever soil is abundant, and this is as likely to be the case in the Arctic as elsewhere, the prevailing vegetation is grasses, sedges and the like; and in some places, no matter how far north, this kind of vegetation completely obscures the non-flowering. “Barren Ground” is a libelous name by which the open land of the north is commonly described. This name is better adapted for creating the impression that those who travel in the North are in- trepid adventurers than it is for conveying to the reader a true pic- ture of the country. If we want to be near the truth we should “GNTIGE AUWUVYOdWAT, WIHT, DNIMVIA[ ‘GGSO1D GITIEMYG SHAW GH THE S84 SHEL GNAOUY S90 YAO Ug SMOLINOSOY GHL OIG] NI BAAIY ANIWUAddO-) HHL NO Uhl RN a SK Rares oe ae 1. There are hundreds of species of flowering plants and dozens of species of moths and butterflies found on the most northerly islands in the world. 9. A meadow and flowers of the cotton plant—Herschel Island, North Coast of Canada. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 17 rather follow Ernest Thompson Seton who is so impressed with the grasslands of the North that he makes the expression “The Arctic Prairies” the title of his book describing a journey north. Mecham, one of the most remarkable of arctic travelers and the original explorer of southwestern Melville Island and southern Prince Patrick Island, says in his report, published in the Parlia- mentary Blue Books of Great Britain for the year 1855, that many of the portions of Melville Island which did not happen to be rocky reminded him of English meadows. This was five hundred miles north of the arctic circle and this is the case no matter how far north you go. Northern Greenland is not only the most northerly land so far discovered but the refrigerating effect of the ice in the sea is there greatly accentuated by the chill from the inland ice- cap. Here, descending from the inland ice to the coast, Peary found musk oxen grazing in green and flowered meadows among the song of birds and the hum of bees. That the musk ox is a grass-eating animal and not a lichen-eater, and is the most northerly land animal known, sharing that distinction equally with the cari- bou, shows that grass must be abundant on the most northerly lands. We now come to the remarkable adjective “lifeless,” so fre- quently applied to the North. What has been already said is an indirect comment on this, but we may develop it further. Look in any work of oceanography, and you will find the statement that in the ocean the amount of animal life per cubic unit of volume does not decrease as you go north from the equator. To this it is of course possible to reply, “Oh, yes, but when we call the arctic lifeless we are not thinking ‘of the depths of the sea but of the sur- face of the land.” If that is the position taken, it differs diamet- rically from that of such a polar authority, as, for instance, Sir Clements Markham, a former president of the Royal Geographical Society of Great Britain, who on page 166 of his “Life of Admiral McClintock” speaks of the “polar ocean without life” in contradis- tinction to the polar islands, which he recognized to be well sup- plied with it. The arctic grasslands have caribou in herds of tens of thou- sands and sometimes hundreds of thousands to a single band, with lesser numbers of musk oxen here and there. Wolves that feed on the caribou go singly and in packs of ten or less, and their _ aggregate numbers on the arctic prairies of the two hemispheres must be well in the tens of thousands. There are the polar foxes, both white and blue, that feed in summer on the unbelievable Swarms of lemmings that also form the food of hundreds of thou- 18 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC sands of owls and hawks and gulls. There are the goose and brant and swan and crane and loon and various species of ducks. The ground at the moulting season in some islands such as Banks Island, three or four hundred miles north of the arctic circle, is literally white with millions of wavy geese and equally white with their moulted feathers a little later in the season when the birds are gone. When you add to this picture the bumblebees, blue-bottle flies and abundant insect life of which the clouds of mosquitoes form the most impressive and least tolerable part, you get a picture of a country that in summer certainly is not without life. “But then,” it may be said, “there comes the winter when the insects live only as eggs and larve containing the potential life for the coming year, and when all land animals migrate south.” It is true that this opinion can be supported by direct quotations from explorers, especially the early ones. It seemed so eminently reason- able to men brought up in England that any animal with legs to walk on would move south in winter, that they translated this be- lief into a statement of fact and asserted that both the caribou and the musk ox leave such islands as Melville in the fall to come again in the spring. If this were so, surely my companions and I could not have lived on the meat of land animals which we killed every month of the year as far north as 76° and even 80° N. Lati- tude. Musk oxen never leave any island on which they are born, for there is no evidence that they go out on the sea ice at all. Caribou do move about from island to island but they are just as likely to move north in the fall as to move south. On the north end of Banks Island McClure found them abundant in midwinter seventy years ago, and we found them more abundant in the north end of the island than anywhere else every winter while we lived there. The bull caribou shed their horns about the middle of winter, and even the summer traveler cannot fail to notice that the horns of bull caribou are scattered over every arctic island that he visits. No more than the caribou and musk oxen do the wolves that feed on them go south. The white foxes leave the islands and the mainland, ninety per cent. of them, but they go north rather than south. What they really do is to leave the land for the sea ice, where they subsist through the winter on remnants of seals that have been killed and not completely devoured by the polar bears. The lemmings stay in the north. Most owls and most ravens go south but some spend the winter north. Fully half the ptarmigan remain north of the arctic circle. The hares live in winter about where they do in summer. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 19 To sum up, the arctic sea is lifeless except that it contains about as much life to the cubic mile of water as any other sea. The arctic land is lifeless except for millions of caribou and of foxes, tens of thousands of wolves and of musk oxen, thousands of polar bears, billions of insects and millions of pied And all these go south in the fall except the insects which die as they do in temperate lands, and except the ptarmigan, caribou, foxes, wolves, musk oxen, polar bears, lemmings, hares, weasels, owls, and ravens, all of which we have named in approximately the order of their decreasing nu- merical strength.* Then there is the “silent north.” Nothing is more characteristic of the Arctic as it has been imagined to be than its silence. But it will appear just how silent a summer must be where the air is continually filled with the hum of the blue-bottle fly, ubiquitously waiting to deposit its larve, and the buzz of the mosquitoes, hover- ing in clouds to suck the blood of man or beast. There are the characteristic cries of the plovers and the snipes and the various sandpipers and smaller birds, the squawking of ducks, the cackling of geese, and the louder though rarer cries of the crane and the swan. And especially the night is resonant (if you are “of a nervous temperament” you will say hideous) with the screaming of loons, in its nature somewhere between the scream of a demented woman and the yowling of cats on a back fence. Two characteristic noises of southern lands are absent. There is not the rustle of leaves nor the roar of traffic. Nor is there the beating of waves upon a shore except in summer. But none of these sounds are heard upon the more southerly prairies. The treeless plains of Dakota when I was a boy were far more silent than ever the Arctic has been in my experience. In both places I have heard the whistling of the wind and the howl of wolves and the sharp bark of the fox at night; in both places I have heard the ground crack with the frost of winter like the report of a rifle, al- though these sounds are more characteristic of the Arctic. In the far North not only is the ground continually cracking when the temperature is changing and especially when it is dropping, but near the sea at least there is, not always but on occasion, a con- tinuous and to those in exposed situations a terrifying noise. When the ice is being piled against a polar coast there is a high-pitched screeching as one cake slides over the other, like the thousand-times * On the arctic prairies of the mainland there remain for the winter also the muskrat and the grizzly bear. Of the sea life only whales and walruses are known to go south. 20 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC magnified creaking of a rusty hinge. There is the crashing when cakes as big as a church wall, after being tilted on edge, finally pass beyond their equilibrium and topple down upon the ice; and when extensive floes, perhaps six or more feet in thickness, gradually bend under the resistless pressure of the pack until they buckle up and snap, there is a groaning as of supergiants in torment and a boom- ing which at a distance of a mile or two sounds like a cannonade. “The eternal polar silence,” writes the poet in his London attic. But Shackleton’s men, as quoted in his book “South,” now and again commence their diary entries with the words “din, Din, DIN.” Robert Service some distance south of the arctic circle in a small house in the city of Dawson, wrote much of the arctic silence. But we of the far north never forget the boom and screech and roar of the polar pack. The literary north is barren, dismal and desolate. Here we are dealing with words of indefinite meaning into which each of us reads what significance he chooses. Part of my bringing up was on the level and treeless Dakota prairie where I heard daily plaints from my mother expressed in one or another and sometimes in all of these adjectives. She had been brought up within sight of magnificent snow-capped moun- tains with deep purples and blues in the folds of the hills, and what she was really complaining about was that the prairies had no mountains in the distance. They were also treeless, but so had been my mother’s mountain home, and she had no longing for trees and even almost a dislike for them. I heard the same complaints of the dreariness and desolation of the prairie from our neighbors. They, like us, were newcomers, but from a country of forest and hill. No doubt they had read much of the beauty of the mountains and were willing to concede it in the abstract, but what they were lonesome for was the shade and the rustle of trees and the relief to the eye of hedgerows and orchards. To my mother desolation meant absence of mountains; to them it meant absence of trees; but to me, brought up on the prairie, the desolation was not per- ceived and the complaints were cries without meaning. When I later moved to a country of hills and woods I had a feeling of being restrained, shut in. A mountain on the horizon does not trouble me. But even to this day when I get close in among them my most pronounced feeling is that they shut out the view. No matter how high the peak that you climb, there are all around other peaks, each with its secret behind it. No landscape is open, free, fair and aboveboard but the level prairie or the wide-stretching sea. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 21 Few of the explorers of the far north have come from a moun- tainous country but most of them have been brought up among hills and woods. So what they mean when they call the north barren is that it is devoid of trees, and when they say desolation they mean absence of cultivation and habitations of men in the sense in which they are familiar with them. Two stories on one subject illustrate this completely and give, I believe, the whole truth of why we have so often been told that the north is barren and desolate. A young man by the name of Thomas Simpson had come in 1838 direct from his home among the woods and hedges of Eng- land to the limit of the forest area on the arctic circle, just north of Great Bear Lake. Except for the Atlantic voyage he had traveled to Bear Lake chiefly if not entirely through a country of hills and woods, and here for the first time in his life he was face to face with the open country. He came to a lake about thirty miles long surrounded by hills of varied form. There were trees at the east end but he could see them only in the far distance; there were trees at the west end which he probably did not see at all. He did what is customary when a European “discovers” some place to which he has been guided by the natives whose an- cestors have been brought up in the vicinity: he gave the lake a name. He named it “Dismal Lake.” And in his book he goes nearly to the limits of the language in telling us how desolate and dreary, forlorn and forbidding, blasted and barren the country was. Half a century later there grew up in England a man by the name of David Hanbury. He did not come to the far north di- rectly from England by a route exclusively through woods. For one thing, he had purchased a ranch and lived on it off and on for years in Wyoming. He was familiar with the prairie and even with the uninhabited prairie. He had read Thomas Simpson’s book, and the adjectives had made enough impression upon him so that when he approached Dismal Lake he expected the place to live up to its name. But all Thomas Simpson had really meant when he strained his vocabulary was that trees were absent or far away and that there was some snow on the ground. To Hanbury treelessness and a covering of snow would not of themselves have constituted desolation. Perhaps partly as a reaction against Simpson, he goes to the other extreme and describes the lake as a wilderness paradise. Simpson chanced to come to the lake in winter and Hanbury in summer, but this was not where the differ- ence lay, as Hanbury makes clear and as I can testify personally. For with a familiarity with the prairie and with treeless mountains 22 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC equal to Hanbury’s, I have lived a year in the vicinity of Dismal Lake and visited it both summer and winter, and I agree with Hanbury that the man who describes such a place as dismal, deso- late and dreary is telling nothing of interest beyond revealing the peculiar meaning which certain common words have in his mind. Those parts of Manitoba which produce more to the acre of the best wheat than almost any other part of the world are still fre- quently described as barren and desolate by visitors from a forest country, even by those who will concede that it is “the bread basket of the world.” When land of great money value and acknowledged fertility is described as barren and desolate, we have the key to the common impression that the north deserves these terms. You will remember that the North and especially the stars as seen in the North are frequently referred to as “cruel.” This is a purely subjective word. The surf that is a delight to a strong swimmer may seem cruel to a landlubber who falls in. It is so with the North. If you are sufficiently inept at meeting its conditions, you may find it as relentless as the sea; but if you know its ways you find it exceedingly friendly and homelike. One might go on almost indefinitely demolishing common con- cepts about the North, but we shall end with the depressing effect of arctic darkness. When I first went North to spend the winter of 1906-07, I was a good deal of a hero. I had all the wrong notions about the North, or nearly all, for I had read most of the books that had been written on the subject. But, like the typical explorer, I was brave and prepared to fight the best fight I knew how and to die if. necessary for the advancement of science. (You see I came from an instruc- torship in a university, and “science,” rather than adventure or a desire for the laurels of the hero-martyr, loomed great before me.) I discreetly feared all the terrors of the North but I feared the darkness most. For in addition to the published books I had come in contact with miners from Alaska who had told me how people up there went crazy and shot themselves, either because of the depressing effect of the winter darkness or because of the nervous strain and insomnia caused by the ‘eternal daylight” of summer. Fortunately for me, this winter was not spent with men like myself. In that case we might have hypnotized each other into actually feeling what we expected to feel. I had gone to an ap- pointed rendezvous at the mouth of the Mackenzie but the ship that was to meet me there never turned up and I, the only white man in the vicinity, had to throw in my lot with the Eskimos. I THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 23 was surprised at their kindness, courtesy and hospitality. I was surprised at how little conspicuous were the filth and other horrors I had read about, although there was enough for literary material if suitably magnified. But what surprised me most was that the sun was sinking lower every day and the darkness coming on apace without these benighted people appearing to worry at all over the circumstance. Four of them could speak broken English. As I remember it now, three out of these four expressed a frank surprise when I intimated that I dreaded the coming darkness; but the fourth said that he was familiar with the thought, for he had been on whaling ships and had often heard “tenderfeet”’ who were spend- ing their first winter in the Arctic talking about the coming dark- ness. He himself had been put up to it by some mischievous per- sons to invent for the benefit of these green hands dreadful stories about the gloom of a coming winter. But privately he regarded dread of the darkness as one of the peculiarities of white men which he did not understand, and he went on to say that he noticed that the old whalers who had been in the North a long time soon got over it. This ought to have been encouraging. But I was so obsessed with the “winter night” that I actually succeeded in working myself into something of a depression, and when, after an absence of several weeks, the sun came again, I walked half a mile to the top of a hill to get the first possible glimpse of it and wrote in my diary what a cheerful and wonderful sight it was. J never did this again. Now, after ten winters in the North, the return of the sun is scarcely more impressive to me, though more detlinitely noted, than the stopping of it at the summer or winter solstice when I am living in New York. And if I make mention of it in my diary the entry is never longer than half a line and is usually when I am on a journey to indicate roughly the latitude—for the day upon which the sun returns and the portion of it visible above the horizon the first day depend mainly on two factors, the latitude and the refraction, which latter in turn depends in part on temperature. I have found that the ordinary ship’s crew can be divided with regard to the arctic night into three sections: The most intelligent men, such as for instance young college graduates, can have the fear of the darkness explained away completely and they will pass their first “winter night” without any noticeable depression. The second group, such as the typical sailor or Alaska miner, have heard a great deal about how depressing the darkness is and you can explain yourself black in the face without their believing you. 24 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC They remember that Jones went crazy and they have not forgotten what Smith told them about his first winter, and they know they are going to be depressed. And they are depressed, to a degree at least. The third group are such men as Hawaii Islanders, Cape Verde Islanders, or southern negroes, whom we frequently have in our northern crews. They have never heard of the depressing ef- fect of winter darkness and are quite as ready to believe the local Eskimos and the captain of the ship who say that the gloom of win- ter is imaginary, as to believe the forecastle men who are in dread of it. I have questioned every one of the men of this type whom I-lrave met and none of them have noticed that they were appreciably depressed by their first “arctic night.” The winter darkness is to the Eskimo about what the hottest period of summer is fo the city dweller. The darkness, as such, may not be agreeable to the Eskimo any more than the heat, as such, is agreeable to the man of the city, but to each of them it means the vacation period. The clerk gets his two weeks in which he can go to the seaside or to the mountains. The Eskimo’ has found it inconvenient to hunt during the periods of extreme darkness and sees to it that he has laid by a sufficient store of food to take him through for a month or two. Having no real work to do, he makes long journeys to visit his friends and, arrived, spends his time in singing, dancing and revelry. For this reason most Eskimos look forward to the winter darkness more than to any other period. The darkness of Christmas shows itself to be about as depressing on the north coast of Canada as the darkness of midnight on Broadway. The soundest reasoning leads to the wrongest conclusions when the premises are false. On the basis of the Arctic as it is supposed to be the Eskimos would be as wretched in the circumstances of their lives as theory makes them. But the fact that they are not wretched has penetrated to most of us through the uniform asser- tions of about ninety per cent. of the northern travelers and ten per cent. of the northern missionaries. Although most explorers have filled their books with accounts of what a happy, carefree life is led by the Eskimos, a few have called them wretched, meaning really thereby that they imagine they themselves would be wretched if they had to live as the Eskimos are living. No one of them can have failed to notice how much leisure the Eskimos have for games, story- telling, singing, dancing and the enjoyment of life in general, and most explorers will agree that an Eskimo laughs as much in a month as the average white man does in a year. One reason why the Es- THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 25 kimo is happy is that in the uncivilized state he usually has enough wholesome food to keep him in perfect health. And if there is a royal road to happiness it is through health. From the missionary we must, if we are logical, expect a rather more pessimistic picture. He is by profession a reformer and goes North to improve conditions; if he found them excellent his work would, by his own confession, be useless. Some missionaries too, are so deeply religious (in the orthodox sense) that they are constitutionally incapable of con- ceiving that any one can really be happy unless he has been “saved.” When we realize that the Eskimos secure their living with little labor as compared with the rest of us, and that they are healthy and happy, it dawns on us that they are really inhabiting a desir- able country. Nearly every close observer from Sir John Richard- son down has pointed out that on the continent of North America the relation of the Eskimos to the Indians south of them has always been aggressive, and though there is fear on both sides, still the Indians are far more frightened of the Eskimos than the Eskimos are of the Indians. It follows, then, that the Eskimos have not been crowded by a more powerful people into an undesirable place which they now inhabit. There is no more evidence that the Eskimos have been crowded north by the Indians than there is evidence that the present population of England are living there because crowded north by the French. But now comes the paradox of human conservatism everywhere. The Eskimos who inhabit these desirable coast lands and who are firmly of the opinion that they are desirable, were as grounded in the belief of the desolation and lifelessness of the ocean to the north of them as were the scientists or the explorers. The pioneer side of our work consisted in testing, in the way which we shall tell, the theory that the ice floes of the northern ocean, no less than the is- lands which sprinkle it, were capable of supporting life and that white men were competent to demonstrate it. The Eskimos con- sidered theory and test absurd, and would take no part in it. One attribute of a high civilization is a development of the spirit of adventure, of the will to experiment. It is possible to get some white men to try anything, no matter what the risk; but to get an Eskimo to try anything is not possible if the venture seems futile or dangerous. We do many things for honor and glory, for | science and humanity, and some things for dare-deviltry; but to | an Eskimo dare-deviltry is inconceivable and he could get neither ' honor nor glory from his own people by risking his life to establish a theory. They would consider his action merely silly and he would 26 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC lose caste instead of winning it. Why should a man who lives in a country where seals are abundant and caribou can be had in addi- tion, concern himself about establishing the fact that seals are abun- dant in some other place where caribou cannot be had? Enough is as good as a feast; and if you have plenty of seals here, what more is there to be gained if seals are elsewhere? So we had to do our work without the assistance of the Eskimos and in a field which was as much beyond their intellectual vision as the ice a hundred miles offshore was beyond the vision of their eyes. Dr. R. M. ANDERSON. CapTaIn Ropert A. BaRrtLett. ‘uosdoH pely “sAeMolg seedy ‘VaSVIY ‘MOuaVEG—Suva A ‘VISVIV ALOT YOI WVG PION() dO NGZILIQ) ATHTHLUON LSOJ, GH, ‘mouuvg ‘HOUNHO ANV DoWdO LSOg “IOOHOG ATYTHLUON LSOPL ‘AION ‘AWON—GULVEH J, ATYAHLYON LSOTY ‘aNd NIGVO DO'[—VOINAINY NI ASMOHSNID ATUTHLUON LOY as alee a = bn Maes ; e ection: h ene) Oe YT = CHAPTER III GOOD-BYE TO “CIVILIZATION”? FOR FIVE YEARS HEN our three ships sailed from the romantic “Gold Camp” of Nome, Alaska, late in July, 1913, northward into the polar ocean, I was dissatisfied with our expedition in only one important respect. It was too sumptuously outfitted. Forethought appeared to have anticipated every eventuality. We had a plan ready for every accident: if plan A went wrong, then plan B would be substituted. We had a staff of thirteen scientific specialists to look after the gathering of information each in his own department. There was a good man, ably assisted, in com- mand of each of our ships, and in the Karluk, in which I sailed, I had Captain “Bob” Bartlett * with the reputation of the world’s best ice master, the confidence of the crew, and his alternative replies to any suggestion or order of mine—‘Right sir!” when he felt formal and the crew were within earshot; otherwise “Don’t you worry—leave it to me!” The trouble was, there seemed nothing left for the commander of such an expedition to do. ‘He spake, and it was so” promised to be the story of cur enterprise. There may be much to be said for the fiat method of creating a universe, but it cannot be sup- posed to have been interesting. I feared I should be actually bored by all that smooth-working machinery. My fears on this score began to be gradually removed. First, the thirty-ton gasoline schooner, Alaska, under command of Dr. R. M. Anderson, had trouble with her engine and had to put into Teller, ninety miles north of Nome, for repairs. Then a gale came up and our two remaining ships separated. This was because Captain Peter Bernard of the Mary Sachs (30 tons, twin propellers, gasoline power), with the advantage of local experience, believed in keeping his ship near shore, and did so, while Captain Bartlett, a “deep-sea skipper” from the Atlantic, struck for the open sea. It was a lively gale. Our 250-ton Karluk was carrying more | than she should below decks, and on deck she had 150 tons with * For a brief “Who’s Who” of the expedition, see the appendix. 27 28 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC which she would never have been allowed to sail had there been at the port of Nome rigid inspectors unwilling to except an explor- ing vessel from the rules that are supposed to promote the safety of ships at sea. She was so deep in the water with her heavy cargo that her decks were nearly awash, and in spite of good seamanship, crashing waves occasionally got a blow at the deck cargo, eventually shifting it enough to make her considerably lop-sided. Things were getting interesting when, after fifteen or twenty hours of a heavy sea, we got into the shelter of Cape Thompson. I don’t believe the skipper would have liked to admit that we were running in for shelter as such, and so the understand- ing was that we pulled in there to wait for the Mary Sachs and to buy dogs and dog-feed. To get these commodities we followed up along the land to Point Hope. Point Hope is just beyond the reach of tourists and of the journalists who write fascinating magazine articles about ‘“primi- tive people untouched by civilization.” It hes in that tame inter- mediate zone where missionaries, equipped with victrolas and sup- plied by yearly shipments of canned goods, labor heroically for the betterment of the natives, who realize that they are badly off just as soon as they are told about it. It is one of the anomalies of our world that it should take the efforts of so many self-denying people to awaken the wretched to a consciousness of their wretch- edness. We occupied twenty or thirty hours in buying a few dogs and a great deal of walrus meat for dog-feed at the village of Point Hope, and we also engaged two Eskimos, Pauyurak and Asatsiak. It was my intention to hire a number of Eskimos eventually, but I preferred to pick them up farther east, where I am personally ac- quainted with them and have known many since they were children. I should have liked to wait for the Mary Sachs which pre- sumably was behind us, but our gale had been blowing from the north and it was likely that the ice was on its way though still unseen and possibly distant. It seemed better to get along east toward Point Barrow before the ice should block the way, leaving the Sachs to follow, if indeed she were behind. For about a hun- dred miles northeastward we had a beam wind from the northwest and open water. But the swell was gradually subsiding, so we knew the ice could not be far away. It is a principle of esthetics that you like what you are used to, and that nothing is so horrible as the absolutely strange. We THE F RIENDLY ARCTIC 29 are told by Plutarch that Hannibal’s generals had heard much before leaving Carthage of the ugliness of Alpine mountains but that when they came in sight of them the grewsomeness far ex- ceeded their worst fears. Similarly we southerners who have heard much of the horrors of the ice, and whe associate it with such tragedies as the wreck of the Titanic or the death through starva- tion of Sir John-Franklin’s hundred men, are likely to feel about the polar pack when we come in contact with it that same sense of imaginings verified. But after years of friendly dealing with the ice, seeking my food upon its surface or at its margin, walking upon it by day and camping upon it comfortably at night, I am as much at ease among its floating cakes as the Swiss are among the Alps that horrified Hannibal’s African generals. I have the feeling when I come to the ice from the open ocean that one native to forests may have when he comes to a wooded country after a journey over the prairie. I imagine Bartlett felt much as I did. I did not ask him. I was born and brought up on the prairie, so I am always at home there. I have spent eleven years in close contact with the polar ice and shall always be at home there whenever I am able to get back to it. I am at home also in the big cities, for I got to them before I was yet mature and have lived in them for ten or fifteen years. But so far I have been unable to feel at home either | in a forest or in a mountainous country, for my experience with them has never been long enough for me to become acclimated. I do | not remember ever having more distinctly the feeling of home- | coming than I did when, near Wainwright Inlet, the first line of | white appeared upon the horizon. I climbed from the deck well | up the rigging to have a good look at the pack. | While the appearance of the ice was friendly and familiar, it | was in another sense not propitious, for it meant delay. The north- | west coast of Alaska between Point Hope and Point Barrow is | shallow inshore, without a real harbor anywhere. The northerly | wind had brought in from afar the ice which three or four days | before had been out of sight from the entire coast, as we later learned from the natives. Now it was coming in at a speed of | perhaps a mile an hour. It had already struck the coast ahead | of us, and as we proceeded the space of open water became narrower until about thirty miles southwest of Point Barrow there was no | chance for further progress. Bartlett, accordingly put the nose | of the ship against a big ice cake, saying to me that now that we 30 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC had to stop anyhow, we might as well use the opportunity to teach our “bunch of scientific tenderfeet” that fresh water could be got from sea ice. This remark recalled a series of episcdes beginning in an im- pressive suite in a London hotel where I had gone to call on Sir John Murray, who at that time divided with the Prince of Monaco the honor of being considered by scientific men the leading living authority on oceanography. I was in Europe for the purpose of securing special scientific equipment and a few experts for our technical staff, for, the expedition being British, we desired to get in other parts of the Empire, so far as possible, such men as were not available in Canada. On the advice of my friend, Dr. W. S. Bruce, Director of the Scottish Oceanographical Laboratory, and, so far as polar waters were concerned, a more trustworthy adviser than any one else in the world, I had already selected as the oceanographer for the expedition James Murray, who had been biologist with Shackleton on his first Antarctic expedition. Before serving with Shackleton James Murray had been associated with Sir John Murray in the Scottish Lochs Survey. We had now gone to call on Sir John for advice as to the proper equipment to carry and what problems to stress in our work. After a technical discus- sion of two or three hours as to various forms of sounding-machines, dredges, nets and other paraphernalia for ocean investigation, Sir John ordered refreshments and we spent a pleasant hour hstening to his reminiscences of the Challenger Expedition “which discovered a new world at the bottom of the sea,’ and his later ocean ad- ventures. Among the stories told by Sir John was one of a cruise in north- ern waters, I think north of Norway or perhaps farther east. On this occasion they ran short of fresh water and something was wrong with the distilling apparatus, so that the ship’s company were in difficulties. The sea where they were was mainly open, but here and there were small scattered floes, and off on the horizon they could see ice blink, indicating that more extensive ice was lying just beyond range of vision. It occurred to Sir John, he told us, that possibly this more extensive ice might have been formed in the mouth of one of the great Siberian rivers, for from his knowl- edge of ocean currents he thought it not at all improbable that ice which had lain in the mouth of one of these rivers the previous spring might now be floating somewhere in their vicinity, although the distance was considerable. He spoke of this possibility to the captain, and the ship steered towards the ice blink and presently THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 31 found itself among substantial floes. They nosed carefully up to one of them. On examination they were gratified to find that this was “river ice from which they could get fresh water.” At this point I asked Sir John how he knew it was river ice, and was dumbfounded by his reply: “It was obvious,” he said, “for the water on top was nearly fresh and the ice itself, except on the edges where the spray had been dashing on it, also tasted fresh.” In spite of being the greatest living oceanographer, Sir John was unaware of the fact, which I then supposed to be well- known to all polar explorers, that sea ice becomes fresh during the period intervening between its formation and the end of the first summer thereafter. Here we might digress again to comment on one of the differ- ences between an art and a science. Among polar explorers are some of the noblest names in the history of Britain since Elizabeth, and so it is in the histories of many of the other seafaring countries. Most of these explorers have been great sailors and gallant gentle- men; some of them, such as Franklin and Peary, have scarcely been sailors in the proper sense, though their careers have not been for that reason any less honorable nor less honored. But few of them have been scientists, and polar exploration has never been a science. It has been rather something between an art and a sport. It is the essence of the code of the scientist to publish at once for the use of the world every secret, whether of fundamental principle or of technique. But it is no violation of the ethics of a craft or of a sport to keep secret and to employ exclusively for one’s self and one’s immediate associates such knowledge as one has. I once asked Peary why he had not published certain things that we were talking about, and his reply was, “My dear boy, I am not printing anything until I have got the Pole.” It was only after he had reached the Pole and after he had retired that he wrote his book, “Secrets of Polar Travel.” I have found, since the point first came to my attention, that although some polar explorers knew that sea ice becomes fresh a large number never discovered it. In view of this it is really not so astonishing that Sir John Murray, although he had been a student of the ocean all his life, had overlooked this fact; for, after all, his work had been done mainly in tropical and temperate regions. There are few things considered more certain than that the ocean is salt, and there is no inference more logical (although no inference is ever really logical) than that the ice of salt water must also be salt. Because of his position as leading authority on the subject 32 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC and because I had already approached him in the attitude of one who knows little and hopes to learn much, I felt reluctant about explaining to Sir John my knowledge of the freshness of sea ice. For one thing, it is always a delicate matter to spoil a good story by taking away the point of it. However, I tried in a diffident way to explain that I also had had the idea of the saltness of sea ice when I first went North, but that I had learned from Eskimos that it was fresh, through observing that they commonly make their drinking water from it and that this drinking water is per- fectly fresh to the taste. Also I suggested that if there were any salt it would appear when one makes tea, for the quality of water is then peculiarly apparent. We had used it for five Arctic winters, I said, without ever finding any salty flavor in the tea, except where we had chosen ice that had been dashed by salt spray so late in the fall that the spray had frozen on the outside. Even then fresh water could be secured by chipping off the outer or spray layer and using the inside of the piece. Indeed, I don’t think I got quite so far as this in my explana- tion when I noticed that Sir John was not looking responsive. Some interruption occurred, and he changed the topic. Evidently he cared for no information from me on this subject and had no idea that what I was telling him was anything more than some unsup- ported heresy of mine. As we walked to our hotel I commented to James Murray upon how extraordinary it was that this eminent oceanographer did not know the freshness of sea ice. I took it for granted that my companion agreed with me and did not realize until months later that he had received my remarks in the silence of disbelief. One day at Nome, when the Karluk was lying in the roadstead loading up, I received a written request on behalf of the scientific staff to meet them at a certain hour to discuss the equipment of the Karluk. I thought at first it was the scientific equipment they wanted to discuss, and it seemed to me rather late in the day, since nothing of that sort could very well be purchased at Nome. It turned out that what they had on their minds was the water tanks of the ship. They pointed out to me that on the voyage from Victoria to Nome, while they had not actually gone short of fresh water, they had been obliged to be very careful with it. They had had enough, for instance, to wash their faces with, but had been compelled to take their baths exclusively with salt water. If the voyage had been a little longer they would have had to wash even their faces and hands in salt water, reserving the fresh THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 33 water entirely for cooking and drinking. It seemed to them there- fore that I should do something about increasing the capacity of the fresh water tanks. This proposition astounded me. I had considered carefully the capacity of the tanks in relation to the voyage from Victoria to Nome, which is almost as long as the Atlantic voyage from New York to Liverpool. In consultation ‘with Bartlett I had decided that the tanks would be adequate even for this voyage, and now that we had reached Nome and were on the outskirts of the polar sea, it had appeared to me that all doubts were over. I suggested that it would be only a few hundred miles until we should be among the polar ice. I said that the ordinary method of naviga- tion in Alaska is to follow the land as you proceed eastward, never going far from shore and always keeping between the land and the ice. We could go inshore for water at any time, but if we went too far offshore and got beset, we should always be able to get fresh water off the ice itself. At this point Murray became party spokesman. He said that in winter it would be easy to get snow for cooking and drinking, but that in summer there would be no snow on the sea ice, and that if the ship became hemmed in by floes in such a way that it was impossible to reach the land, we could have no way of getting drinking-water. When he had been in the Antarctic with Shackle- ton they had sometimes used ice for cooking, but that was different, for it was always glacier ice they used. It was well known there are no icebergs or fragments of glacier ice in the sea north of Alaska. And he went on to say that I might possibly consider it to smack of insubordination, but that he had been constrained to tell the other members of the scientific staff in this connection about my interview with Sir John Murray, where he had himself been present and where Sir John, who was the greatest authority on the ocean living, had dismissed as ridiculous my suggestion that salt water ice became fresh. It was only then I recalled the silence of James Murray on that walk home. It turned out impossible for me to convince my staff that it would be safe on the score of drinking water to take a ship out among the ocean ice. A number of them were prepared to resign, considering that a person so lacking in judgment and discretion as to be willing to take an entire ship’s company into a position where they might all die of thirst must be in general unsuitable for the command of any arctic expedition. Had I known in advance the topic of the meeting I should have 34 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC suggested that Bartlett be present. I now went to him and asked him about his experience with getting fresh water off sea ice. He replied that it was well known among the Newfoundland sealers that you could always get it and that they never carried large fresh water tanks on that account. In fact, there had never been a time when Bartlett did not know that salt water ice becam fresh. : At the time Bartlett thought he would have no trouble in con- vincing the scientific staff, but he told me later that he had had “a hell of a time to get some of that crowd to see reason.” He did succeed in a measure, at least to the extent that I heard nothing further about the size of the tanks, and I had nearly forgotten the incident when his remark about “showing our bunch of scientist tenderfeet that ocean ice is fresh” recalled the whole train of events. After the ship had been tied to a floe, the first officer, John Anderson, went “ashore” on the ice, dragging the end of a long rubber hose to a small pond on the surface about ten yards from the edge, and water was pumped in till all our fresh water tanks were full. The next meal was a triumph for the staff. Somebody remarked that the coffee was bad, and it was found that much of the food was more or less spoiled through being too salty. When the cook informed us that it must be because of the water, a sampling brought out the fact that it was indubitably brackish. There were several remarks passed then about the probability of the laws of nature working on polar expeditions as they did elsewhere, and Scripture was quoted to the effect that salt is not likely to lose its savor. This miscarriage hurt Bartlett more than it did me, for a man who commands sailors for years finds it useful and almost neces- sary to appear infallible. But we were both soon justified. The trouble was that the mate, being a new man, had taken water from a pond near enough to the edge of the floe to have been filled with salt spray during the recent gale. The ship’s tank had to be emptied and the hose carried a few yards to another pond remote enough from the edge so that the water in it was produced either by the falling of rain upon the floe or directly by the sunshine. The tanks were then filled with perfectly fresh water, and that trouble was over. When we tied up to the floe we had a sea of scattered ice behind, but ahead between us and Point Barrow everything was packed THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 35 tight. It was only a question of hours, if the wind remained in the same northerly quarter, until we should be as closely hemmed in from behind as we were before. The wind did not change, and by noon the next day everything was so closely pressed together that we felt sure of being able to walk ashore, although the distance was several miles. We had drifted ahead since tying up and the village of Cape. Smythe now lay only about twenty-five miles ahead. I thought it would be a good idea to walk to land and then up the beach to make some purchases in the village and pos- sibly to hire some Eskimos, these to be picked up by the Karluk whenever the ice opened again so she could proceed. Thus we might save a day or two of time. To give Dr. Mackay a chance to compare the Arctic with the Antarctic, I invited him to come with me. A dog sled carrying a canoe for use in an emergency accompanied us ashore, but we found not the least trouble in hop- ping from cake to cake even in places where there was a little water separating them, and finally from the last cake to the beach. The sled with the boat returned to the Karluk and we started on our walk northeastward. The first thing the Doctor noticed was the prairie-like character of the land, for grass covered everything. I think he almost hoped at first that this was the exception, but by the time we had walked a few miles over a country something between a prairie and a meadow he finally asked if all the Arctic was like this. It did not come at all up to his expectations; or, rather, it did not come down to his expectations. He had been reading the literature of arctic exploration from childhood. Eternal ice and everlasting snow, silence and desolation were what he expected. When he found instead green grass, twittering birds and buzzing mosquitoes, he felt like one who runs a long way expecting to see a fire and finds no houses burning. I was able to reconcile him to the sit- uation somewhat by promising in due course winter blizzards, fairly low temperatures, and a few worthy difficulties. But it was clear that his general feeling remained one of disap- pointment, if not disdain. This was nearly the most northerly point of continental North America, and it measured up to neither the books that he had read nor the Antarctic in which he had spent a year. The fact is, however, that although in appearance the Antarctic does come more nearly up to story-book standards, it is an easier country to deal with, especially for those who come to it burdened with the heroic ideals of the classic explorer. Peary has made this clear in various of his books and other writings. 36 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC On the way to Cape Smythe the Doctor and I met a party of Eskimos tending one of their herds of domestic reindeer. We walked among the herd and found them fat, considering the season, and much tamer than range cattle in places like Montana or Al- berta, although not so tame that you could walk up and tough them. Commonly they allowed you to get within ten or fifteen feet and then moved quietly away. The Doctor ran after some of them, pretending he was trying to catch them, and they just kept out of his reach. Very likely they were used to being similarly pursued by the Eskimo children. Incidentally I learned that one of the Eskimo owners now had about a thousand head of reindeer. As there were many other Eskimos willing to buy them from him for twenty-five dollars per head paid in furs, and as he was a clever trader and could easily have made on the furs an additional profit, we can say that his property in reindeer alone was worth over $25,000. This Eskimo, named Takpuk, was also doing whaling on a large scale and employing others to trap for him, so that he had in his service about a hundred and fifty men. He was, therefore, both for wealth and enterprise a remarkable exception to what we suppose Eskimos to be, although not so much of an exception to what Eskimos really are. At Cape Smythe I was among old friends. I knew most of its three or four hundred Eskimos, and the Europeans were either friends or acquaintances. In the Government school were Mr. and Mrs. G. W. Cram, and at what had formerly been the whaling sta- tion but is now mainly a trading establishment were my old and very real friends Charles D. Brower, Jack Hadley, and Fred Hopson, Mr. Brower being the resident manager and part owner of the Cape Smythe Whaling & Trading Company. During the next two days I engaged the single Eskimo, Katak- tovik, and the married man, Kurraluk, with his wife, Keruk, and their two children. I also engaged Hadley; and there were many reasons why I wanted him. For one thing, all my Karluk men were new in the Arctic except Bartlett, and Bartlett came from a part of the Arctic where conditions are so fundamentally different from what they are around Alaska that I felt the need of at least one man with whom I could talk over local conditions with a certainty that he had the knowledge necessary to criticize my own ideas and give opinions of value. I had the highest opinion of Hadley’s judgment, both because of the sort of man he was and because he had been living on the north coast of Alaska acquiring experience for more than twenty years. His experience was of all sorts. He ‘duayy WAAANIGY NVASVIW YS Khe V7 PE iy cms te arc ons a nuts AN ae S ni Dae eg eee ee : wi ; ; pals Ss] THe ADAPTABILITY OF THE SKIN Boat. (1) Umiak being hauled on sled. (2) Umiak under paddles in narrow shore lead. (3) Umiak raised on edge to shield goods from rain. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 37 had been trapper and trader, and a whaler both on board ships and with the Eskimos in their skin-boats. This last was an important consideration, for I look upon the Eskimo skin boat, as do all those in Alaska who have had experi- ence with it, as the one boat suited for use among ice. Such a skin boat, or umiak, when thirty feet long, which is a common size, will carry a cargo much larger than a 28-foot whale-boat, although the whale-boat is three or four times as heavy. And the whale-boat besides is very fragile. When the ordinary clinker- built whale-boat is moving at a speed of six miles an hour it is easily stove by contact with even a small fragment of floating ice, while an Eskimo skin-boat going at the same speed can bump into ice of almost any shape or size without injury. With a whale- boat it is as if the ice were struck by an egg-shell; with a skin-boat it is as if it were struck by a football. In one case there is a crash and a dead stop; in the other a thump and a rebound. And if the umiak suffers injury it is merely a cracked rib that can be replaced, or a hole in the skin which can be patched with needle and thread. An umiak capable of carrying more than a ton of freight can be carried over land or solid ice by two men, and if placed on a low sled of the type used for such boats it can be pulled along by three or four dogs, or two or three men. Any one who goes to the polar regions in ships realizes that any ship, no matter what the strength or what the style of construction, will be broken by ice pressure if the pressure comes in any but a certain way. If a ship is wedge-shaped like the Fram, or is semi- circular in cross-section like the Roosevelt, she may be lifted up by ice pressure if the ice is so low that it strikes her below her line of greatest diameter. But as her greatest diameter is only a few feet above the water, and as some ice cakes are ten, fifteen or twenty feet out of water, it is generally luck that determines whether the pressure is so applied as to lift the ship or to crush her. Peary says that “any vessel navigating in polar waters may at any time be crushed so suddenly that nothing below can be saved.” * I am glad Peary puts this so clearly, for although I know of no whaling captain or experienced ice traveler who is of any other opinion, still, there is among arm-chair explorers a very common belief that ships of a certain design or strength are immune against being crushed. Realizing this, I was naturally particular about providing not only the plans but the equipment for retreat towards land in such *“Secrets of Polar Travel,” by R. E. Peary, p. 109. 38 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC an event. The central item in any such equipment, in my opinion, should be the skin-boat. Ifa ship is crushed by rapidly moving and | tumbling ice floes in the summer, a retreat from her with any equip- ment may become dangerous. But if she is broken in winter, then the process of breaking up is fairly sure to be slow, giving ample time to place on reasonably stable ice in the vicinity any equipment that one cares to save. The crew of the Karluk would be about thirty, and a typical skin-boat will carry about that many people. Ac- cordingly I purchased an umiak and planned that in case of danger it would be the first thing saved and placed on the ice. If the wreck of the ship occurred in winter the umiak would be put on a low sledge, which I also bought for the purpose, and hauled towards shore over the ice either by men or by dogs. As shown in the adjoining il- lustrations, we frequently travel with such a boat hauled by five or six dogs and carrying inside of it all the camp equipment of the party. And along with this boat I wanted Hadley, who through much experience was not only a master in the handling of skin-boats but knew how to make and repair them. Of course our Eskimos were familiar with these things but their knowledge would not be so useful in a party of white men as the knowledge of a man like Hadley, who had also the ability to explain and, if necessary, to command. The boat and Hadley were therefore taken partly as insurance against a by no means improbable breaking of our ship. We spent two days very pleasantly as guests of Mr. Brower at his station. After my purchases for the ship’s use had been made, I bought some Eskimo ethnological specimens and in particular a clay pot which Mr. Brower had been able to secure for me. Although on previous expe- _ ditions I had dug up bushels of fragments of clay pots, I had found no ~ unbroken specimen. In view of the fact that some authorities have — doubted that the Eskimos of northern Alaska made clay pots at all and in view of their rarity in any event, this was something of a prize. Another remarkable specimen was a lip button, or labret, made of “Amer- ican jade” (jadite). This beautiful stone is one of the toughest and least workable, and still the ancient Eskimos made adzes, knives and ornaments of it. The custom of wearing lip buttons, like any other fashion with which we are not familiar, seems to us strange and possibly grotesque. Ac- cording to tradition, the Eskimo women used to wear them, but in historic times they have been used only by the men. It is said the women had one perforation in the middle of the lower lip. If that is so, their method of wearing them was the same as that of the Indians of southern Alaska. But the Eskimo men have two holes pierced in the lower lip, one below each corner of the mouth. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 39 The initial perforations are made when a boy is fourteen or sixteen years old, when little plugs are put in, just big enough to keep the hole from closing up entirely. As the healing takes place it is the mucous membrane of the inside of the mouth rather than the skin of the outside of the face that forms the lining of these holes. After the healing is complete, bigger and bigger plugs are put in until the hole in the lip is somewhat bigger in diameter than a lead pencil. The orna- ments are then put in by one of two methods: either they are inserted from the inside, somewhat as a collar-button is put in a shirt, or they are buttoned in from the outside, if it is desired to wear one of the large labrets. I was now able to buy one of jadite that, as I remember it, must have been about two inches and a half long and more than an inch wide. This ornament, that would have been unique in the ethnological collection of any museum, was unfortunately later lost, and we have not even a photograph to show what it looked like. I suppose the Eski- mos considered it beautiful, but to us it would have been remarkable chiefly in showing to what grotesque lengths ornamentation may go, for when buttoned into one corner of the mouth it would have extended below the chin of the wearer and up his cheek fully halfway to the eye. The custom of wearing labrets once extended from the most southerly Eskimos on the south coast of Alaska around the west end of the penin- sula and east along the north coast into Canada as far as Cape Bathurst. When I first came to the mouth of the Mackenzie in 1906 it was still customary to pierce the lips of young men, although there were some who refused to have it done. A year or two later the practice was definitely abandoned and now perforated lips are seen only among men of middle age or beyond. It would be of ethnological interest to know why the labret fashion did not extend east beyond Cape Bathurst. Following the tendency to seize upon explanations that are “sensible,” some writers have pointed out that the severity of the climate increases gradually as you go east- ward from Bering Straits, so that labrets could not be worn to the eastward without great danger of freezing the face. The stone of which the labrets were made was assumed to be a good conductor of heat, and to induce freezing of the parts immediately touching it. The trouble with this eplanation is, first, that the postulated increasing severity of winter climate as you go east is by no means pronounced; and second, that no such freezing as premised has ever been known to occur. I have observed that Eskimos who take their labrets out while in the warmth of the house put them in before going out of doors into the most severe weather, and I have found on inquiry no Eskimo who has ever heard of freezing of the lip brought about by the wearing of a labret. On the other hand, being without the labret out of doors is inconvenient for those who have perforated lips, for the holes in many cases are so low _ that the saliva streams out through them and down the chin if they are not plugged up with a button of some sort. This happened in the 40 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC house also and some of the old men had to be continually wiping their chins. Outdoors, however, the wiping could not be done comfortably and it would have been very messy to have the saliva stream down on the front of the fur coat. So the real labrets were formerly worn on going out; and now that the fashion has set against these ornaments, inconspicuous wooden or ivory buttons are worn on going outdoors in cold weather by those still living whose lips are pierced. It is more probable that the Eskimos got the fashion by coming in © contact with labret-using Indians on the southern coast of Alaska, that the fashion gradually spread from those Indians northward and east- ward for a thousand miles or so through the Eskimo country, and that it had not had time to pass beyond Cape Bathurst. We have some traditional evidence to support this view. Moreover, we know that the a tobacco habit was spreading similarly east along the north coast and had reached the mouth of the Mackenzie about a hundred years ago. Roughly seventy years ago it got to Cape Bathurst, about the same time as the first white visitors. The coming of the whites accelerated the eastward spread of the tobacco habit because the whites were used to it: but it stopped the labret fashion because the whites were not used to it and brought their influence against it. ‘SOWIMSH ‘SOWIASY SIZNAMOVIT AM NUOAA SLauav'] YAddOQ—AONV(T SHOOGLAG NV Hod orsayy EsxKimo ScHooL CHILDREN AT Barrow. | a CHAPTER IV THE SEEDS OF TRAGEDY surprise, came into view. The wind was still northwesterly and the ice was densely packed against the land. She was not coming along steaming through any open water, but was being car- ried helpless by a current that was grinding the ice northeastward along the coast. Sometimes she was moving broadside on, sometimes stern foremost, and at all times she was powerless. Her speed was probably about half a mile per hour. When she came near the village it was apparent that she was going to pass us at a distance of less than a mile from shore. Although the ice cakes were drifting, rising on edge, quivering, cracking and splashing, this was all in the slow and nearly uniform way which does not worry Eskimos or other persons used to traveling over ice. So we loaded our umiak on a sledge, loaded other sledges with the supplies purchased, and with the assistance of half a hundred Eskimos and many dog teams belonging to Mr. Brower and to them, succeeded in getting all our gear aboard the Karluk as she drifted by. We then said good-by to our friends, expecting not to see them again for two or three years. While at Cape Smythe we learned that had we come along two or three days earlier we should have found nothing but open water and there would have been no trouble for either a steamer or a sailing vessel to get around Point Barrow, the extreme tip of which is about ten miles northeast from Cape Smythe. Two ships had, in fact, passed around safely and easily, the Elvira, com- manded by Captain C. T. Pedersen, and the Polar Bear, com- manded by her owner, Captain Louis Lane. A mile or two beyond Cape Smythe while we were still being ground along by the ice, the Karluk began to creak. The ice did not appear very heavy and a discussion arose among the men as to whether the Karluk, if more powerful, might have been able to break her way from the grip of the ice and proceed as she pleased. It was the general opinion aboard that such ships, for instance, as the United States Revenue Cutter Bear, which was expected at 41 O» second day at Cape Smythe the Karluk, somewhat to our 42 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Cape Smythe in a few days and was a vessel known to all of us, would have been able to steam through the ice easily. The Bear is a powerful wooden vessel of the old Scotch whaler type and a very good ice ship. This discussion has been settled since, for the Bear arrived at a point southwest of Cape Smythe a few days after us, was caught in the ice near where the Karluk was caught, and like the Karluk was carried helpless, stern foremost, past Cape . Smythe. She was even less lucky, for the Karluk gave no worry beyond some ominous creaking, but the sides of the Bear were squeezed so that her decks bulged noticeably.* When in our slow grinding movement we finally got opposite the northwest tip of the continent at Point Barrow, the pressure was relieved. We were not out of the grip of the ice, however, and for some hours things looked pretty bad, for as soon as we got beyond the Point our ice started off to the northwest at a speed about four times as great as before, or about two miles per hour. This we had expected. The summer of 1912 when I spent sev- eral weeks at Cape Smythe, the whaling bark John and Winthrop lay at anchor about a mile from the coast for two or three weeks. During most of that time the wind blew from the northeast with a force running as high as what sailors call a “strong breeze’; and still the current, coming from the southwest and running against the wind, was so strong that not once do I remember seeing the ship swinging at her anchor before the wind, as might have been expected, but always either broadside to the wind or with her stern into the wind. During that same time, however, the condition east of Point Barrow had been different. Then the current was running with the wind, and when the two currents met in the vicinity of the Point they took a course which was a resultant of the motion — and strength of both, and after joining forces ran off to the north- east. The Karluk was now in the tail of this Y. But according to theory, the current ought soon to spread and spend itself, and we were not a great deal worried. * «|. The chief work of a polar ship is to push and pry and wedge its way in and out among cakes and floes ranging from three to twenty or fifty and even up to one hundred and twenty feet thick. A passage cannot be smashed through such ice, and nothing remains but to squeeze and twist and dodge through it. A hundred Yermaks (the powerful Russian ice breaker) merged in one could accomplish nothing in such ice. “Many qualities are necessary in a first-class polar ice-fighter. First, there must be such a generally rounded model as will rise readily when squeezed, and thus escape the death-crush of the ice. Then there must be no projection of keel or other part to give the ice an opportunity to get a grip, or to hold the ship from rising.”—‘Secrets of Polar Travel,” by R. E. Peary, pp. 6-7. ——, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 43 In this everything went according to expectations. After a few hours of northwestward drift, the ice ‘“slackened out” and we were able to advance under our own power. The Karluvk took an east- erly course and proceeded along the land, keeping six to ten miles from the shore, without adventure, until we got east beyond Cape Halkett. There was scattered ice everywhere, but none to interfere seriously with progress. In crossing Harrison Bay east of Cape Halkett we had a small adventure. Among the local whalers who have been in these waters since 1889 there is a custom of “sailing by the lead.” They know on every part of the coast how near it is safe to approach, as indi- cated by the soundings which are taken continuously by a man stationed at the lead. But our officers were new in these seas, and were deceived by navigation signs upon which they relied. They had not previously sailed in icy waters except such as have a change of levels due to tides. In most parts of the north Atlantic seaboard a cake of ice that is aground in shallow water has a peculiar mushroom-like appearance, for high tide is only a matter of an hour or two, and at all other times these cakes are lying aground with the water around them much lower than it has been at the moment of high tide. In such places an experienced navigator can tell by glancing at a cake of ice whether it is afloat or aground, and if it is afloat he always knows that his ship has plenty of water under her keel. But here in Harrison Bay even the grounded cakes presented an appearance of being afloat, for there had been no rise or fall of tide to give them undercut edges of the kind found in the east. I had not been on deck for some time, for no difficulties of navi- gation had presented themselves, but when I did go on deck I could see from the bridge an island almost directly ahead. To any one of local experience this was a sign of imminent danger. I asked the man at the lead, who was supposed to take a sounding every fifteen minutes, what depth of water we had and he replied nine fathoms. I knew this could not be true, for no island would be visible from the bridge in Harrison Bay if the water were nine fathoms. I realized that the man, thinking actual sounding unnec- essary, was merely pretending to sound. Accordingly I asked Cap- tain Bartlett to come on deck, but before he had time to quite get his bearings, the oceanographer, Murray, came running to us with considerable excitement, saying the ship was aground and had | stopped moving. The going aground of a ship under steam, even though it is 44 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC moving at a speed no greater than six miles an hour, would ordi- — narily be accompanied by something of a shock. This was not so oS in our case. The bottom here is soft mud, for this is the mouth | of the Colville River and the depth may not vary as one steams directly towards land more than a foot or two to the mile. As we | were not steaming directly towards land (except for the little delta island that lay ahead), the depth may have been changing even. A less than a foot per mile. In this way the keel had commenced ~ cutting the mud so gradually and gently that the ship was brought to a full stop without anybody but Murray realizing it. He ~ noticed it because he was near the stern dredging for marine life — and his dredge rope had slackened. He had then gone to the — stern and had seen that the propeller was churning up mud and that the ship had stopped. We have just said that there is practically no tide in this region. Normal tide varies during the twenty-four hours only by some six or eight inches. But there is at certain times what we call a “storm tide.” It seems that when a strong southwest or west wind — begins to blow in the region of Bering Straits, it produces (through ~ barometric variation of pressure, perhaps) a wave that moves east- _ ward and reaches the Colville delta- or Herschel Island, possibly eight to twelve hours ahead of the storm itself. This rise of water — that presages a strong sou’wester may sometimes amount to as © much as five feet, and even in a moderate southwest wind the rise © may be a foot or two. There is a corresponding fall with or before | a northeast wind, these two being the directions of the main winds ~ in this locality. Now it happened, luckily for us, that a storm ~ tide was coming in from the southwest, so that after an hour or — two aground the water rose enough to float us. As we made our | way to seaward, this time casting the lead every few minutes and — steaming carefully, we had to go a mile or more before we got — an extra foot of water under our keel. | From the Colville delta eastward the ice kept getting thicker. There was a light breeze from the northwest bringing it in slowly — from abroad. Finally, it became impenetrable. We might now ~ have turned the ship to seaward, on the theory commonly held in — the north Atlantic that the farther away from land you are, the better the chance of finding the ice scattered and conditions permit- ting navigation. There was also the Alaska or Beaufort Sea theory. For years I had been listening to the tales of local captains, telling that when they first navigated these waters after serving their apprenticeship y THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 45 in the Atlantic they had lost ship after ship by following the Atlantic rule of keeping twenty miles away from land. Their ex- perience had been that if ships stuck among the Atlantic ice they were very likely to get loose again eventually, for in most places the current runs south into freer waters where the ice slackens out. But north of Alaska they had found conditions diametrically oppo- site. There a ship that gets into the ice and starts moving with it is not likely ever to get out, for the pack gets tighter instead of loosening, and the drift is not southward but northward to the more ice-infested regions. I had heard these captains tell that over half a hundred ships had been lost by the American whaling fleet in the Beaufort Sea before they finally adopted the rule of always keeping between the land and the ice. Since then a few \vessels had been lost, but the proportion had been far less and there was always this difference: that formerly when ships were far from land the men had great difficulty in making their escape by boats or sledges, and all cargoes were invariably lost; while of recent years if a ship had been squeezed against the land or sunk by pressure near shore, the crews had never been in serious danger. Entire cargoes had been saved in some cases, and the more valuable parts of them in others. This was so well known that whenever a whaler sank near shore without saving the best of her cargo, the talk in the whaling fleet was that the size of the insurance policy explained the loss. So ran the arguments of the local whaler. In reply to them it could be said that while these conservative practices were all right for merchantmen, a bolder policy might reasonably be expected of explorers whose chief concern was neither the saving of cargoes nor the collection of insurance policies. One flaw in the whaler argument was that the fifty ships lost might not have been lost at all but for the timidity through which they had usually been aban- doned by their crews. Who knew but they might have been trium- phantly extricated if the crews had stayed by them a month or a year? We certainly would not abandon the Karluk if she were caught in offshore ice. Bartlett and I discussed these things fully, and decided for the ore conservative alternative. We steamed inshore according to local practice and followed the edge of the ice until, when it prevented further eastward progress, we finally anchored at Cross Island. This is one of an interrupted chain of reefs which lie about fifteen miles north from the mainland coast of Alaska, separated from it by a “lagoon.’’ Between the reefs and the main shore are | 46 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC devious channels through which ships drawing even more water — than the Karluk can navigate if they have either a good chart or | expert local pilotage. A boat could be lowered and sent with a © sounding lead ahead, the Karluk following when the boat had — signalled sufficient depth of water. By this method we could enter — the lagoon at Cross Island, proceed thirty or forty miles east and come out into the ice again at that point. But of course it was always possible that the northwest winds would continue through — the entire season, and that the freeze-up would come without giv- ing us a chance to leave the lagoon till next summer if we once entered it. We never had on the Karluk any formal consultation of all the | officers, any organization approaching in character a “General Staff.” But informally the ship’s officers and scientists discussed — all questions of policy freely and every man among them knew the opinions of every other. The only exception to this rule happened to be myself. We had taken the ship over from a whaling captain, | Captain 8. F. Cottle, and her internal arrangements were still in general those that immemorial experience has shown to be best on — small ships that make long voyages; the sailors bunked forward | and had their mess; the rooms of all-men of the grade of officer— mates, engineers, and in our case the scientific staff—were amid- — ships, and they had their own mess. The commander alone was aft, in quarters that differed from the others not so much in being ~ luxurious, though they were roomy, as in being isolated. Partly — through this isolation, inherited from my predecessors the whaling skippers, partly through inclination, I discussed ice navigation little except with two men—Bartlett because he was sailing master, and |) Hadley because he was an old friend and a fountain of inexhaust- ible northern lore. a Directly, then, my views of ice navigation were not well known to officers and men. Indirectly they were well known, for Hadley — talked freely with every one and it was understood, and correctly, — that his views and mine seldom differed materially, being founded | ; on a common experience in the same sector of the Arctic. As we are now at an important point of the expedition, it is — best to take a backward glance in order that the situation of the — moment be made clear. | When I first learnt from the National Geographic Society and the American Museum of Natural History that they would furnish THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 47 me with enough money to buy a ship, I asked the advice of Captain C. T. Pedersen of San Francisco, whom I had long admired as the best ice master personally known to me. Some of the associ- ates of my earliest years in the North—for instance, Captains Leavitt, Tilton, Bodfish and Cottle of the New Bedford and San Francisco whaling fleets—had had more experience with the ice of the Beaufort Sea, but they had either retired or were by now rather old for the vicissitudes that might follow shipwreck. Every whaling ship on the Pacific Coast was known to Captain Pedersen, and he had advised me, that of them all the Karluk was the soundest and best adapted to our purposes. Though she had been fighting Beaufort Sea ice for twenty years she was still as strong as when new. This opinion was afterwards amply con- firmed by three different ship inspectors engaged to examine her and every other available whaling ship from keel to rigging, and later when she was overhauled in the naval drydock at Victoria. These details are mentioned because one view of later events was that they resulted from the Karluk’s being “unsound.” Before purchasing the Karluk I had engaged Captain Pedersen }as sailing master, and it was he, acting as my agent, who actually |took the ship over at San Francisco and. after the expedition be- came a Canadian naval enterprise, sailed her to the Victoria naval base to be drydocked. Later, during my absence in Europe, Cap- tain Pedersen got the unfortunate impression that in order to be our skipper he would have to renounce his American citizenship. It was for that reason he accepted an offer to go to the Arctic for some San Francisco fur traders. That the impression was not valid is best shown by the fact that Captain Bartlett, engaged in his place, was and remained an American citizen (naturalized— he was born in Newfoundland.) In most fields men of local experience are the most valuable. But with Captain Pedersen gone’ Captain Bartlett became my choice on the ground that his experience with Peary, although in another part of the Arctic, made him the best man available. Furthermore, at the moment of having to make up my mind I was with Admiral and Mrs. Peary, both of whom advised it strongly. Peary reminded me that Bartlett was a marvel at handling sailors or stowing a ship, and was a man to take the responsibility of avery detail off your shoulders. When Bartlett took charge of the Karluk I found him every- thing that Peary had said. With the reputation he brought with 48 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC him and his efficiency in managing the affairs of the ship, he won the admiration and confidence of everybody. And he obeyed every order effectively and without quibbling. We have outlined the two main views of ice navigation—the bold Atlantic policy of ‘keep away from the land, face the ice and take your chances”; the cautious Alaska one of “hug the coast, play safe, and if you don’t get there this year you may have an- other chance next.” There were divided opinions aboard, but I was in command and the decision and responsibility had to be mine. I decided for what a friendly person would call the bolder course. But whoever prefers to be truthful rather than kind must say I chose the wrong alternative. After lying at Cross Island for several hours, discussing theories and plans, we hove anchor and steamed deliberately north, away | from land, threading our way between the ice-cakes and occasion- ally ramming them to break a way. “It may be safe, but I don’t think so,’ said Hadley. Every one else seemed delighted with our adoption of what they considered the bolder and more sportsman- like policy. | Relentless events were to prove this decision my most serious | error of the whole expedition. CHAPTER V THE KARLUK IN FETTERS OF ICE quietly to rest against a big floe. As Bartlett came down from the masthead he said to me that now the ship was where she ought to be and that we would wait here until the ice slackened out. That was what it was supposed to do on the theory selected, and Bartlett always took the most cheerful view possible of any situation. He had already given orders to have the ship tied to the cake by an ice anchor, and was in the best of spirits. It was Hadley’s forebodings that worried me. I had not been just then at the masthead with Bartlett where, from a hundred-foot vantage, a truer idea of the water between the floes can be gained. From the bridge the ice all around looked pretty tight and I imagined we must have come to a halt only because no open water had been visible ahead. I learned from Bartlett later that open water had been visible. He had, how- ever, decided that since we were twenty miles from shore this was the strategic position in which to wait, again according to the adopted theory. What we saw from the masthead next morning was not reassur- ing. The evening before there had been around us perhaps half a mile of open water, but now the ice cakes had gradually edged in until our hole was not much more than two hundred yards wide. After a survey of the horizon Bartlett ordered the ship freed from her moorings and we steamed across the two hundred yards, bunt- ing ineffectively against the ice on the other side. After one or two bunts, which could not have been very heavy inasmuch as we had no room to back away for a good charge, the Karluk was tied up again. She never moved of her own volition after. During the next day or two the ice kept gradually pressing | tighter, huddling together more closely. At first the cakes lay flat, but gradually the increasing pressure made some of them rise on edge. Those next the ship were pressed against her sides till she | groaned and quivered with the strain. In a day or two nearly 49 [ was several hours after we left Cross Island that the ship came 50 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC every little hole between the ice masses was filled with débris by the crushing of the floe edges under pressure, for to the south and east, far away and invisible, the land was holding, while from the northwest the wind was blowing upon a million pieces of ice stuck on edge as upon a million square sails, till each piece strove like a full-rigged ship to move before the wind. But none could move except by crushing or pressing up on edge the cake that lay in its way. ‘The pressure in the aggregate was near to infinite. To the square foot it was great enough to break the Karluk or a ship far stronger—strong enough to break any ship built. It would have crushed us had we not been protected by being in a pocket among especially strong adjacent floes. Drifting in the pack is a tense game. In the beginning you have a certain amount of discretion in choosing your berth. After that it is luck upon which the life of your ship depends. And luck may change at any time. A day or two after we were beset it began to freeze. In four or five days young ice had formed in every little open space where irregular strong floes did not fit exactly against each other. You could walk about anywhere without much danger of breaking ~ through. The wind had been northwesterly, and for a time we kept drifting eastward until we found ourselves in Camden Bay, fifteen or twenty miles offshore. Then the wind changed and we began a drift westward. By this time I had made up my mind that the Karluk was not to move under her own power again, and that. we were in for a voyage such as that of the Jeannette or the Fram, drifting for years, if we had the luck to remain unbroken, eventually coming out some- where towards the Atlantic, either we or our wreckage. Among the things to be concerned about was that we had on board several men who had no business to be there. James Murray was one. He was about forty-six, a little older than the age preferable for such work, although I have in the Arctic been asso- ciated with men of even sixty who did their part and stood the work better than many younger men. One of my main concerns from the beginning had been oceanography, and Murray’s depart- ment interested me greatly. Impelled by the double desire of keeping him safe and of gaining the greatest possible oceanographi- cal information, I had decided to put him in command of the Mary Sachs. Our oceanographical equipment was all on the Karluk, and it was to have been the task of Murray and Mackay between Nome and Herschel Island to separate it into two divisions. Some THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 51 was to be left on the Karluk under the charge of Mackay, while Murray was to have taken much of it and transferred it at Herschel Island to the Sachs. My plan was that, with Murray in command of her, the Sachs should act in a measure as a tender, carrying supplies for Dr. Anderson towards Coronation Gulf or doing similar errands for Bartlett and the Karluk, if that became necessary. She was to hold herself ready to help wherever needed. In her spare time, which I hoped would be considerable, the Sachs was to cruise about in the triangle between Herschel Island, Coronation Gulf and Cape Kellett, venturing as far as she cared northwestward into the Beaufort Sea, but always keeping in this comparatively ice- free district. For although she was seaworthy and staunch in every other way, she was incapacitated for too close contact with the ice through having two propellers. An unexpected increase of cargo at Nome had compelled us to buy the Sachs, in spite of the twin-propeller drawback, as the only craft available. This increase of cargo was due to my yielding to certain members of our staff who thought they would need certain provisions and equipment I had planned to dispense with. When a ship has a single propeller located amidships, aft, the passage of her body through the ice shoves it away and keeps a clear path for the propeller. But with the twin screw arrangement the propellers stick out at the sides aft in such a way that when the ship forces her way through ice she does not make a road wide enough, and the propellers will strike the cakes that have slid back past her sides. There is a good deal of ice in the spring in the southeastern Beaufort Sea, and in some years peculiar wind con- ditions will keep it there at all seasons, but often this region in which I expected the Sachs to be employed is quite ice-free after | the early spring is over. Besides Murray, McKinlay too should have been elsewhere. If he were to be on the Karluk he should, of course, have had with | him all his magnetic equipment, some of which was now on the ' Alaska. Most inappropriate of all was the presence of the two anthropologists, Beuchat and Jenness. They had been taken i aboard because the Karluk was not only the safest but the swiftest | conveyance for Herschel Island. Murray was to land there with _| his equipment to wait for the Mary Sachs, and Beuchat and Jenness | to study the Eskimos, not only for what information they could _| put on record, but also for the value to themselves of becoming |) quickly used to the ways and, if possible, to the language of the 52 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC natives. Their equipment was naturally most of it aboard the Alaska. When I realized how close we were to the land in Camden Bay I attempted to put Beuchat and Jenness ashore. No attempt was made to land Murray because his equipment was too heavy, or McKinlay because he had enough magnetic gear with him to be useful on the Karluk and too much for easy transportation ashore. We got out to the skin-boat, hitched up a team of dogs, put a certain amount of equipment into the boats, and detailed two Eskimos to accompany them. It is probable that had the party left with almost no equipment they could have reached shore, but what we tried to have them take proved too much of a load, and after getting a mile or two away from the ship they had to return. New ice had formed between the old cakes so that the boat could not be used as a boat, yet this new ice was not strong enough to support it when hauled on a sledge. The sledge kept breaking through, and the men also broke through, occasionally getting wet. I was sorry that the attempt miscarried, and later events deepened the regret. After this we stayed quietly aboard the ship while she drifted. When the wind turned northeast I knew from long experience, al- though we were too far from land to see, that there must be a good deal of open water between the ice and the land. It seems illogical when you look at the map, but it is a fact, attested by universal observation between Point Barrow and Herschel Island, that although a west wind there blows off the iand it brings the ice in to the land; and although an east wind blows off the ice, still it commonly carries the ice away from shore enough to leave hand- some room for ships to pass east and west along the coast. We learned later that this reasoning held for our case, and that while we were drifting helplessly westward, the Belvedere and other ships were passing along the coast eastward, finding no obstruction. One of them saw our smoke although we did not see theirs, the reason being that their smoke was imperceptible against the dark land, while ours was conspicuous out in the gray of the ice. The open water inshore became wider, and we began to see i from the masthead. Then it came within three or four miles and could be seen from the bridge. And here we were, frozen into @ westward-drifting floe, while just inshore of us was free and placi¢ water through which any ship could travel at will. The only comfort was to remember that the Alaska and Sachs, if they hac stuck to the vicinity of land, would be safe now somewhere in thi; THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC | 53 inside lane, working their way eastward. These reflections corre- sponded to the facts as we learned them later. It was on the thirteenth of August that we tied up to the ice to move no more under our own power, and by the middle of Sep- tember we seemed to have stopped moving at all. As we drifted west we had been edging nearer to land, until finally we got inside the line ef Cape Halkett into Harrison Bay, and were set fast off the mouth of the Colville River, not far to seaward from where we had gone temporarily aground about a month before. After we had been motionless for more than a week both Bartlett and I came to the opinion that we were likely not to move again before the next summer.* If it proved an ordinary winter we expected to remain safely embedded in that part of the sea ice which is frozen to the land—the floe edge, or the meet- ing-place of the landfast ice and the moving sea pack, being to seaward of us. We realized, however, that with a very bad gale a floe line between the ship and the land might possibly be estab- lished. I have pointed out before that with east winds the ice on the northeast coast of Alaska, contrary to what might be expected, will move away from land. This is true only with mild winds and is not true with these if they persist a long time. A real gale or a strong breeze of long duration will bring the ice back in, and cause pressure likely to crush any ship that is ice-embedded. But a west wind, although blowing off the land will set the sea pack grinding eastward along the edge of the land floe. We thought, therefore, that any of the following things might happen: First, with a mild east wind the ice would break outside the Karluk and move westward offshore, leaving her unmoved and unconcerned. Second, the east wind might persist for a long time or develop into a strong gale; in which case the ice that had tem- porarily gone abroad would come in against the shore ice, crump- ling it up into pressure-ridges, crushing the ship or failing to crush her exactly according to luck. Third, a light west wind might | break the ice outside, leaving her again unaffected; or, Fourth, if it | were a strong gale it might carry her to the eastward, grinding i along in the pack, leaving her afloat or sinking her, again accord- | ing to fortune. What seemed clear to both Bartlett and me was | that nothing could be done except to make preparations for taking | the men safely ashore in case of wreck; and we thought that if *See “Last Voyage of the Karluk,’ by R. A. Bartlett and Ralph T. Hale, i Boston, 1916, p. 35 ff. 54 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC any party were to go ashore temporarily they could always get back to the Karluk, for they would find her either just where they left her or to the east. It did not occur to us that she could be — carried off, unbroken, far to the westward. The consultations between Bartlett and me resulted in the con- clusion that a hunting party should be sent ashore. We had an abundance of provisions, but no fresh meat. There were some seals to be had around the ship, but the men wanted “variety” in fresh meat and especially they wanted the delectable meat of the caribou. In earlier years I had hunted caribou on the mainland just east of the Colville River and I knew from experience that it was good game country. A logical thing might seem to have been to send the Eskimos to hunt, for the popular supposition is that you cannot be an Eskimo without being a good hunter. The fact is, however, that in a large part of Alaska caribou hunting is a lost art, for caribou have been nearly or quite extinct from portions of that territory for more than a generation. Our two Point Hope men had never seen a caribou in their lives, though they were good seal and walrus hunters. Kataktovik had hunted caribou a little but confessed he did not know much about it. - Kurraluk was a good hunter, for he was of the appropriate temperament. Although he belonged to the Kuvugmiut of Kotzebue Sound who have, since the disap- pearance of the caribou from that region, become mainly a fishing and sealing people, he had spent enough time in the interior with other tribes to become proficient in caribou hunting. But he was a stranger to this district. I was aware that his wife, Keruk, knew every creek and cove in it, for I had first met her on my caribou hunts in the Colville delta in 1909. But we could not afford to let her ashore, for she was our only seamstress and the most important person aboard. We had hundreds of reindeer skins and other skin material that needed to be made up into | warm clothing. It had been my purpose to engage several seam- | stresses either at Herschel Island or Cape Bathurst, but our stick- | ing fast in the ice had settled all that. Now all our garments | had to be made by this one Eskimo woman and by those of our | staff or crew who might be able to learn from her. Several of | the men eventually acquired a degree of proficiency. Captain Bartlett volunteered to lead a party ashore, but he | was under the handicap of not knowing the country, whereas I had the advantage of having hunted through it and of knowing | the places where native villages might be found. This was im-/ THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 5) portant, for it was part of my desire to communicate with Eskimos and try to get two or three families to move aboard for the sake of the seamstresses. One of the customary village sites, that at the mouth of the Itkilik River, is usually well stocked with fish, and I had the further purpose of purchasing there and possibly set- ting our own fishermen to work. It was part of the plan of gomg ashore to take Jenness along to give him a chance to begin his study of the Eskimos, while McConnell and Wilkins were chosen because they were among the most adaptable of the men and I thought would readily take to the life of arctic hunters. I had already formed an opinion of Wilkins, which was continually strengthened, that he would be able to adapt himself to anything. As for McConnell, he was an exception to the general rule of my men. The rest were inclined to follow storybook ideas, in assuming that the Eskimos only could hunt big sea game successfully. They devoted themselves to their fowling-pieces when ducks were flying over, or to ski-jumping and playing other games around the ship, while the Eskimos did the useful work of securing seals for man and dog food. McCon- nell hadn’t had any luck so far, but he had at least avoided the games and the fowling-pieces and had gone out trying to get seals. CHAPTER VI THE KARLUK DISAPPEARS sent from it only a week or two.* We had already made up our minds as to which were the best dogs, and we took instead of them two teams of untried and presumably poor dogs, with the idea of testing these out. We had ten or eleven good new sledges and chose two old and comparatively poor ones, believing we had better not expose the sledges intended for ice exploration to chance injury. Wilkins, whose work and pleasure alike was photography, left all his equipment on the ship except the lightest camera. I had a specially good rifle, presented to me by the Harvard Travelers Club of Boston, which I had promised to use on all important trips. I left this rifle aboard and took an ordinary one. Two or three weeks earlier, when the creaking of the ship had led me to think we might have to leave her at any moment, I had put thirteen hun- dred dollars of paper money into my hip pocket so as not to forget it in an emergency. Now I took this out of my pocket and put it into the strong box in my cabin, along with more than a hundred pounds in weight of silver and gold money which we carried for trade with the Alaska and Herschel Island Eskimos. It was about ten miles ashore. We did not go the whole dis- tance the first day (September 20), partly because we did not start till the afternoon, partly because there was no hurry, and in a measure because the young ice between the old ice floes was still treacherous and had to be dealt with carefully. In addition to the white men I had taken along the Point Hope Eskimos, Asat- siak and Pauyurak. Camp was made in two tents, three men in one, and myself with the two Eskimos in the other. I had made such camps — hundreds of times so that to me it was scarcely an event, but it | interested me because it gave me my first idea of how my traveling | companions were going to take to what to them was a new sort | of life. Here I quote from a magazine article written by Wilkins: *See “Last Voyage of the Karluk,’ p. 36. 56 W ix our hunting party left the ship we expected to be ab- THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 57 The first night on the ice was a new experience. We were shown how to pitch the tent and set out the floor skins and sleeping-bags in the Eskimo manner. According to correct methods, approved by Mr. Stef- ansson, we took off all our clothes to sleep naked in our sleeping-bags of reindeer skins. We did not question the advisability of this, apart from the natural disinclination to undress in a temperature of 20° of frost, for we had been accustomed normally to undress when going to bed. We three novices slept in a tent together, while Mr. Stefansson and the Eskimos occupied the other. He came in, tucked up our sleep- ing bags, and gave us advice about keeping them folded about our shoul- ders. This we scarcely heeded, thinking that we knew how it should be done. But soon, even before we had finished comparing notes for the day, we felt the cold air creeping round our ears and spreading down our bags. A strong breeze had sprung up and it filtered through the tent. We twisted and turned and complained of the cold and thought we had proved one of the Commander’s theories to be a fallacy. It was all very well, we thought, for Eskimos to sleep naked if they wanted to, but we were more tenderly reared and needed more protection. I+ was only the dread of greater cold that prevented us from getting up, put- ting on our clothes and going to bed fully dressed. We didn’t for a moment realize that it was our own incompetence that caused us the discomfort. But after a few days’ perseverance we learned to fold our sleeping-bags around our necks and were generally comfortable, and we eventually got to the point where we no longer wanted to get into our bags with all our clothes on.” The next day we got ashore, not indeed on the mainland, but on Amauliktok, the westernmost of the Jones Islands, a chain that lies about four miles off the coast. Inside this island chain we found the ice young and rotten, so that crossing to the mainland was not practicable and we camped for the night, using for cooking and warmth our sheet-iron stove, and driftwood which in this district is abundant. The name of this sandspit is typical in the sense that an Eskimo place name is frequently found, when translated literally into English, to be the equivalent not of a word but rather of a sen- tence of ours. Thus amauliktok means “he killed a Pacific eider.” If the meaning had been “he killed a King eider” it would have | been “Kingaliktok” which (still more literally translated) means “he killed one with a big nose.” During the evening I decided it would be desirable to have some additional things from the ship. I had given Captain Bartlett | directions that a few days after my leaving he was to send an- other party ashore in the direction of Cape Halkett, and it now 58 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC occurred to me to modify these instructions so as to bring the men ashore sooner. Accordingly, McConnell and one of the Eskimos were chosen to go with a light sled the following morning out to fetch the required gear and carry the supplementary instructions. We were all up early. During breakfast I impressed certain elementary principles on McConnell, urging him also, although he was in command, to follow the advice of the Eskimo if any emer- gency were to arise. After breakfast while the sledge was being hitched I took a walk along the beach, climbing upon a small knoll to get a view to seaward. What I saw was very disquieting. A strong wind had been ‘blowing during the night and the temperature was warmer. To seaward the darkness and blotchiness of the clouds showed that the ice was broken where yesterday it had been continuous, with water reflected in the sky, and clouds of dark vapor rising from the leads. It was evidently unsafe to send McConnell on his er- rand, and during the next two or three hours conditions got so much worse that it dawned on me we were now going to have a test of what would happen to the Karluk if the ice broke up. Now the gale increased until it became the worst storm for that season which I have ever seen-in the North, and this opinion I found was confirmed by the whalers who, unknown to us, were then having their own tussle with the ice some distance to the east. We built out of driftwood a sort of observation tower and occa- sionally got glimpses of the Karluk, but most of the time she was hidden by snow squalls and drifting clouds of mist. In the after- noon I was scarcely willing to believe my own eyes when I saw her moving to the eastward—against the wind, against the current, and against any theory which I could formulate except the one that she had broken loose and was proceeding under steam. The glimpses of her, too, were so fleeting and she was so veiled by fog that I was not even sure that it might not have been a cake of ice that I mistook for her. What I was sure of was that the thing was moving eastward. That was clear because it passed behind nearer ice cakes which I knew to be stationary. This was a night of high tension, although free from that deepest _ of uncomfortable feelings that what was happening could have © been prevented. For a month now I had been committed, if not reconciled, to the attitude that so far as anything we could do was concerned the Karluk was at the mercy of the ordinary forces of © nature and of the laws of chance, at least until the coming spring. _ On the morrow the question of what to do could scarcely trouble — THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 59 us, for there was but one road open. Or rather no road, for the wind had broken the strong ice offshore, the warm temperature had rotted the young ice of the lagoon, and we were marooned on the island. Of course this would be only a question of a few days, for at this time of year a warm spell must be temporary. So it proved. In two or three days the lagoon ice hardened between us and the land, although to the westward it was still too weak for travel. When it cleared to seaward the Karluk was gone; we did not know whither, or whether she still survived. There was no sense in searching for her by sled, for there was vastly more water than ice, so we went on to the mainland. That night we camped by a platform cache made by my own party in the fall of 1908 when we had killed thirteen caribou at this point.* The next day I hunted alone, leaving the men in camp because the weather was thick and uncertain and I did not care to take the chance of their getting lost in the open. All day the walk was without promise, but towards evening I saw a single bull caribou. He was traveling too fast for me, however, for though I gradually got nearer to him, darkness overtook me and I had to suspend the chase. As it happened, I did not resume it next morning. The frost had sharpened and it appeared possible to start west along the coast, for I thought that to be the best chance of overtaking the Karluk. It was possible she might have freed herself and steamed eastward, but the chances were that the ice holding her had followed the coast towards Barrow. At first we had to travel very cautiously, for the ice proved treacherous on account of a light blanket of snow which kept it from freezing hard. On the second evening on the west side of the bay at a point southeast of Halkett we had a rather narrow escape from a serious mishap, for in the attempt to make shore that evening we had traveled into the night, and found ourselves on ice that owing to its extreme thinness and mushiness had upon it black patches of damp snow. It was partly a matter of luck that we did make shore without losing sledges or lives. The next day we were traveling along in the general direction of Halkett when one of the Eskimos said he could smell smoke. None of the rest of us could, but I was willing to rely on the Eskimo, for my experience is that while in eyesight, hearing and every other natural faculty he is about the same as the rest of us, he does seem to excel in the sense of smell. Whether this is *See “My Life With the Eskimo,” p. 64. 60 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC from some anatomical or deep physiological cause I do not know, or whether it results merely from his having lived his whole life in an unvitiated atmosphere with the sense of smell consequently unperverted. In the direction from which the smoke must come, if it was smoke, land was about eight miles away. I climbed on one of the sledges, examined the coast’ with my field glasses, and saw what afterwards proved to be a house, but was now so low and far away that it could not be identified. We traveled towards it, however, and after five or six miles its character as a human habi- tation became clear. It was the dwelling of a single Eskimo family of the Colville River people. They were able to tell us about several other fam- ilies, most of them old acquaintances of mine, that were scattered in various places in the vicinity. Through previous residence in the country I knew the Eskimo names not only of the places I had visited, but also of many which I had heard discussed and which had been described to me by the drawing of crude maps. Had I been a stranger to the topography and to the Eskimo names I should have been unable to form a clear idea of where all these people were living, even with the aid of the most modern published maps and with a thorough command of the Eskimo language; for besides being inaccurate, most maps carry only the names of European explorers, patrons of exploration, or friends of the map- makers. The places and names shown on such maps are unidenti- fiable through any information available from Eskimos, and com- monly even from resident whites. To have full value to the trav- eler an Arctic map should carry Eskimo names, either exclusively or as supplements to the others. I must pay a tribute to the adaptability of my companions. On the Karluk all of them had disliked the seal meat prepared for us by the ship’s cook, who insisted on putting it through various elaborate processes which were supposed to deodorize it and take away its peculiar taste. I had imagined my own dislike for seal meat cooked this way to be a peculiarity due to long acquaintance with the undisguised article. The men all ate it on shipboard with so good a grace that I really thought they liked it. But when we killed the first seal after leaving the ship, cut its meat into pieces, dropped it into cold water, brought it to a boil and served it underdone on a platter in the true Eskimo style, every one of my three companions commented on its great superiority over seal meat as cooked on the ship. Wilkins, who was brought up in Australia and was used to the eating of fresh mutton, said it tasted eee THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 61 very much like mutton and almost as good. That seal’s fat does taste like fresh mutton fat is the opinion of all white men I know who are familiar with the taste of both. The lean, however, while good in its way, has a flavor quite distinct from that of mutton. There may be a more fundamental reason why a man used to an elaborate menu; as were all my present companions, is easier to please than one who has never eaten any but a few simple things. Since many of the modern theories in human dietetics are based on experiments with rats or guinea pigs, analogizing from dogs to men in this field should be no less interesting or instructive. I should like to cite some of our experiences in feeding dogs with foods that were strange to them. In 1908 on my way down the Mackenzie River I bought a dog team which had been brought up on a diet of fresh-water fish sup- plemented with moose, caribou, rabbits and possibly ptarmigan. When we got to the seacoast we had trouble to get these dogs to eat seal meat. JI remember some sailors who told me at the time that they did not blame the dogs. These were men who had been in the country twenty years without ever tasting seal and who naturally knew it was bad. But it was not that seal was funda- mentally less agreeable to dogs; they were merely not used to it. It occurred to me that the dogs were refusing to eat because of the odor of the meat rather than because of the taste. For one thing, they did not put it in their mouths; for another, a dog probably does not have a keen sense of taste, as we may infer from his habit of gulping his food, but his keenness of smell is well known. I now provided seal meat tnat was more or less decayed, thinking that while fresh caribou and fresh seal smelled different, the putre- faction odor in either case would be about the same and would overpower the native smell. This worked at once. And I have never found a dog used to putrid meat of one kind that would: not eat greedily putrid meat of any other kind. By gradually giving the dogs fresher and fresher seal they were easily broken to it. But we had more serious trouble with the same team the follow- ing spring when we tried to feed them on ducks. These ducks were -fresh-killed, hence had their native odor. All the team refused at first, and some went for more than a week without tasting. I determined experimentally, however, that through hanging in the / sun for three or four days, or until it began to smell putrid, a duck became acceptable to any of the dogs. 62 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Some years later I bought a dog in Coronation Gulf which had been brought up mainly on seal. On the north coast of Alaska the following spring we were for a few days in a position where we could get only geese for food. This dog refused for more than a week to taste goose, and I was never able to force him to it. | We had to give up the experiment because of lack of time. As noted below in the case of the wolf meat, it is even possible the dog might have preferred to die of starvation though goose meat was | before him. At another time we had a dog brought up on the Booth Islands, near Cape Parry. Inland on Horton River this dog, which had been used to seal meat only, refused at first to eat caribou and had to be broken to it through hunger, for this was in the winter time when it was not practicable to get the meat to decay. In Banks Island the summer of 1914 we undertook to teach the dogs to eat wolf. This experiment was conducted “under laboratory conditions.” The dogs were kept tied in one place and supplied each day with a dish of fresh water. A piece of wolf meat was placed every day beside the dish and allowed to remain all that day. This meat was then destroyed, for we were afraid it might begin to putrefy and we wanted to-see how long the team would go hungry before eating meat that was quite fresh and still retained the full wolf odor. During the second week five of the six dogs gave in one by one, but at the end of the fourteenth day the last dog had not yet touched it. He was the oldest of the team, which was doubtless why he was the most conservative. He had been the fattest of the lot at the beginning of the experiment and at the end of the second week he was practically a skeleton. At this point I had to stop the test, for we had to begin travel- ing and needed the strength of this dog along with that of the others. It is quite possible that he might have chosen to starve. I have found by experience as well as inquiry that a man fasting does not get any hungrier after the second, some say the third, day, and long before the fourteenth day the craving for food loses its sharpest edge. This is a synopsis of only some of my experiments and experi- ences with the food tastes of dogs, from which I have drawn the following generalized conclusions: Dogs brought up around ships and used to foraging in refuse- piles and eating highly-seasoned food will eat any food offered to them. It seems therefore that a dog used to many sorts does not mind eating one sort more. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 63 Dogs more than a year old brought up on a diet restricted to two or three articles always refuse at first when an entirely new food is offered. They base this refusal on the sense of smell, and if the meat is putrid enough so that the putrefaction smell completely _ hides the native smell then the dog has no objection. In other words, all rotten meats smell substantially alike and are therefore recognized as a familiar diet, while any new kind of fresh meat offends through its strange smell. Hunters and natives who have noticed that dogs will not eat wolf or fox meat commonly remark that dogs object to cannibal- ism. I find that the objection of a dog to wolf meat is no stronger than his objection to duck meat or caribou meat, provided the duck or caribou is an absolutely new meat in the experience of the dog. Once induced to eat wolf, a dog soon becomes as fond of it as of any other meat. We have found that the food prejudice is stronger the older the dog, and we believe that with dogs of the same age the prejudice of the female against new food is stronger than that of the male. This seems to extend the commonly believed-in principle of the greater conservatism of human females down into the lower animals. It would be exceedingly interesting, it seems to me, to make further experiments in the food tastes of dogs along the following lines: Pups of the same litter should be selected, one to be fed for two years on mutton and water, another on fish and water, a third on beef, and a fourth perhaps on a vegetarian diet. It would make the experiment more interesting if a malé and a female could be used for each sort of diet. Judging from our experiments, it seems probable that at the end of two years the mutton-fed dog would refuse both beef and fish, and the fish-fed dog would refuse both mutton and beef. I believe it would also be found that | the abhorrence for the new diet would be stronger with the female in each pair than with the male. It is well known that some Eskimo groups eat either no vege- | table food at all or practically none. But in all parts where we have been, except in Coronation Gulf, they are fond of the berry known in Alaska as the “salmon berry” and elsewhere as the cloud- berry (Rubus chamaemorus Linn.). We were astonished, especially {my Alaska Eskimo companions, when we found that some of the | Coronation Gulf Eskimos lived among an abundance of these berries | and had never thought of tasting them. Since no taboo existed my 64 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Eskimo companions tried to introduce the fashion of eating them. They found no difficulty in getting children to try them, except that | in some cases the mothers were offended by the attempt. The men also were commonly willing to eat them, and I do not recall that even one man refused, but I should say that fully half the women posi- tively refused even to taste the salmon berry during the summer we spent with them. This is really a rather good fruit and I have no doubt that by now most or all of the people are eating it, but our observation that first year seemed to indicate clearly enough the conservatism of the women. We observed it in many other things— for instance, smoking. Although nearly all western Eskimo women use tobacco and although there have been tobacco-using women on our ships when we have come in contact with the eastern Eskimos, — we have found the men readier than the women to learn to | smoke. I have had much experience with the food prejudice of white men in connection with introducing them to a diet of meat only. The laws of that prejudice as deduced from dogs have applied to the men exactly. The older the man the more probable it is that he will object to trying a new kind of food and to abandoning the foods he is used to. A dog brought up on a ship and used to a variety in diet would take readily to a new diet. Similarly, “well brought-up” men, used in their homes to a variety of foods both domestic and | imported, take readily to any new thing—such, for instance, as seal _ meat. But men “poorly brought-up” and used only to half a dozen | or so articles in their regular diet, are generally reluctant to try a new food unless it has been represented to them in advance as a _ luxury or as especially delicious. Of course the situation here is not so simple as it is with dogs. For one thing, the man of “laborer” type has a feeling of being degraded when he is compelled to eat | the food of “savages,” while a man of intellectual type is appealed to by a mild flavor of adventure in experimenting with the food — of a strange people. It was so with my companions now that we were among real | Eskimos. They took readily to Eskimo cooking and seemed to con- sider it great sport. Doughnuts fried in seal oil were sampled as | an adventure, and their deliciousness surprised them. So with > every new thing they had a chance to taste. This is one of the reasons why “well brought-up” young men are the best material for. polar explorers, or indeed for any type of “roughing it,” except the sort to which the “poorly brought-up” man is native. Generalizing EE oe = a A SE THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 65 still more: an educated man of diversified experience has the mental equipment to meet “hardship;” the ignorant are fitted to meet easily only those “hardships” that are native to them. It goes without saying that, like all rules, this has its exceptions. CHAPTER VII NEWS AND PLANS going west ahead of us. The Eskimos said that the trav- _ elers were a party consisting of one white man and three _ Eskimos who had left a whaler caught by the ice and compelled to | winter to the eastward, and were on their way to Point Barrow. Group after group of Eskimos happened in our way along the | coast, and we picked up a good deal of information about conditions _ to the east as the party traveling ahead dropped a word here and © another there. But it was not until we finally got to Cape Smythe © that everything was pieced together. : The Belvedere, under Captain Cottle, carrying a hundred tons | of freight for our expedition, had been able to get within about | seventy-five miles of Herschel Island, where she had been frozen in a mile from the coast. About fifteen miles farther west the Polar Bear was safe a few hundred yards from the beach. But the Elvira had been wrecked. This was not surprising for the Elvira was one | of the vessels considered before the purchase of the Karluk and the | reports of my inspectors had shown that she was thoroughly un- sound. Even in the ice-free waters of the Pacific they would not | believe her good for more than two or three years. She had now. been nipped in the ice, and according to the terms of the insurance. policy, which was a heavy one, she had been promptly abandoned. | Whalers from another vessel later boarded her and saved her catch | of fur and a good many other things of value. Thus the event was. auspicious to everybody except possibly to the marine insurance: people at San Francisco. But most pertinent to us was the information that the Alaska and the Mary Sachs were both safe at Collinson Point. They, in common with all other ships on the coast, had followed the | Alaska practice of going between the land and the ice. Although they had not been able to get as far east as we had hoped, they were at least safe, and we had their supplies to go on with the following year. WW had noticed in certain places along the coast sledge tracks 66 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 67 It was especially unfortunate for us that to the Karluk, believed safest of all our ships, we had entrusted the most valued part of our cargo. One of the main things I wanted to do that next spring on the sledge journey over the Beaufort Sea was to take soundings, and most of our sounding equipment was on the Karluk. The Sachs and Alaska had chronometers for their own use, but the ones intended for sledge exploration were cn the Karluk. The men of adventurous disposition and special qualifications whom I had meant for my companions on exploratory journeys were also there, along with the good dogs purchased in Nome, and the sledges and sledge material which could not be duplicated even at Cape Smythe and even in Mr. Brower’s extensive stock. And of the Karluk with all these invaluable things on board we got no certain news. On coming to an Eskimo encampment at Cooper’s Island about twenty miles east of Cape Smythe we learned that a ship had been there in the ice, three or four miles offshore, for several days.* She had been so near that the Eskimos could see the ropes in her rigging, and had theirs been an ordinary party they would have gone out to her. But they were some decrepit old people who had been left behind by their relatives traveling eastward who were coming back later to pick them up. These Eskimos had been expecting somebody to come ashore from the ship. When nobody came and they never saw any smoke, they concluded she was deserted. It had been a strong temptation to | them to go aboard for plunder, and it was a matter of great regret to them that no young men had been on hand for the purpose. One of these old Eskimos had seen every whaling ship in these waters, | and the Karluk had been a familiar sight to him for fifteen years. He was prompt and clear on the point that this was she. After she had been within observation for two or three days a fog and | wind came up. When the fog lifted she was gone. A day or two later a ship had been seen in the ice off Point -|Barrow. She was said to have been about ten miles from shore and the natives did not agree as to her characteristics. One Eskimo said she was a schooner; in that case certainly not the Karluk. | By the light of later events I now know that it must have been the | Karluk, though at that time I was inclined to think it was the Elvira. Report at this stage was that the Elvira had been abandoned before she sank, so that it seemed she might have drifted westward, jammed in the ice and held up by it, a thing which occurs in shipwrecks of a certain type. *See “Last Voyage of the Karluk,’ p. 48. 68 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Mr. Brower’s welcome when we arrived at Barrow was no less friendly because he regretted our being back so soon under such circumstances. He is an optimist by temperament, as every pioneer should be, and his cheerfulness and friendliness helped to reconcile me to the situation. By now I was completely over the idea that the expedition was going to be uninteresting because of being too easy, or monotonous because of having some one to do everything for me. ; After a day or two at Cape Smythe we set about preparing the best sort of outfit we could. My men on leaving the Karluk had been improperly dressed and this was now remedied through skins and other things supplied us from Mr. Brower’s stores and through the assistance of the Eskimo seamstresses of the village. The one thing we wanted most, however, was good sledges, for I knew that at Collinson Point there would not be more than one or two of the heavy type. It takes an entirely different sled to encounter the rough and shifting ice on the Beaufort Sea from what is needed for work on shore. It had been my supposition that the Alaska and the Mary Sachs would in winter confine their operations to the land or to the comparatively level ice near land and would, therefore, need sledges weighing from seventy-five to a hundred and seventy-five pounds, and they had, accordingly, been equipped with light ones mainly. The kind that I preferred for rough ice work would weigh two hundred to two hundred and seventy-five pounds. With a sledge of that weight Mr. Brower could not supply me, but he had light material for making just one sled and he set about doing that. He made it himself and it was, therefore, as well made as was possible with the materials. It eventually gave us as good service as any sled I ever had of its weight, though it never could take the place of any one of the heavy sledges carried by the Karluk. Although it is three hundred miles north of the arctic circle and within sight of the most northerly tip of Alaska, Cape Smythe had at that time three mails going to the outside world in winter. The first of these was leaving in November, and with it I sent out to the Government at Ottawa a report of the proceedings and mis- haps of the expedition up to that point and a program for future work. This letter is summarized as follows: I told the Minister of Naval Service that I considered it very doubtful whether the Karluk as a ship would survive the winter. I could not be sure in what part of the ocean she was, although in- clined to the belief that she was to the westward. While the pro- THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 69 gram of the expedition was necessarily curtailed, I did not consider that the lives of any of the crew were in danger,* for if the ship were crushed during the winter the breaking would be so slow that they would have plenty of time to put off on the ice all stores and equip- ment necessary for a journey ashore. I placed special faith in the skin-boat and pointed out that the greatest difficulty of the men of the crushed Jeannette in getting ashore was due to the fact that the boats they had to haul over the ice were very heavy and very fragile,** while our skin-boat was less than one-quarter as heavy and many times as strong, and in every way better adapted to the use of men retreating towards land from a ship broken in the pack. If the ship were lost in the dead of winter it would probably be safe to leave without the skin-boat. In other words, there were two safe methods of retreat: one carrying the boat along, and the other abandoning it and going directly ashore with sledges, provid- ing the break-up came when frost was severe enough for temporary breaks in the thick old ice to be quickly mended by the formation of young ice. Should the ship survive the winter and be broken up the following summer, the danger to the lives of the crew would be considerably increased. The ice then is more mobile, stores placed upon it are more likely to be lost, and the journey ashore would involve frequent launchings of the boat into water and pulling it out again for crossing ice floes to the next stretch of open water. Regarding the prospects of the Karluk in general, then, I gave it as my opinion that she might or might not survive, but that the crew would be certain to get safely ashore if the wreck took place in winter, and would have a good chance of getting ashore even if it took place the coming summer. I mentioned that the eastern part of the north coast of Asia is well supplied with food, for it is a settled country with hospitable and well-provisioned reindeer- herding or walrus-hunting natives and white traders scattered every- where. If the Karluk were broken to the west of Barrow her crew had this hospitable coast for retreat. As a prospectus of the coming season I reported the safety of the Alaska and Mary Sachs at Collinson Point. After outfitting at Cape Smythe I would proceed eastward by sledge along the coast. / Alfred Hopson, a boy of sixteen or seventeen brought up at Cape | | | j f , ; i i J : i | * Bartlett, aboard the Karluk, had the same feeling. “I felt sure, come | what might, we would get back in safety to civilization,” he wrote two | i years later, in recording his feelings while drifting in the ice. (“Last Voyage of the Karluk,” p. 50.) #* “Voyage. of the Jeannette,’ by Emma de Long, Boston, 1883. See numerous references. oe | | 70 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Smythe, with a good command both of Eskimo and English, had been engaged as interpreter for Jenness. I would leave Jenness with Hopson among the Eskimos near Cape Halkett where he would put in the winter acquiring a familiarity with the language and lives of the Eskimos. With the rest of the party I would pro- ceed east to Collinson Point. As to the expedition’s southern section the plan had been that it was to spend the present winter in Coronation Gulf and survey in the spring the land in that vicinity. This was now impossible, since Coronation Gulf is seven hundred miles east from where they lay at Collinson Point. I thought it unwise and unprofitable to keep an expedition as large as that of the Alaska idle a whole sea- son simply because they were not in the particular district of my original plan. I would therefore make out a program for them on the following basis: The Mackenzie delta was interesting geographically and impor- tant in its commercial possibilities. And it was accessible from Collinson Point, being only two hundred miles east. I had myself made two journeys the full 2,000-mile length of the Athabasca and Mackenzie River system from Edmonton to the Arctic Ocean, and they had impressed on me the tremendous potentialities of this system as a waterway, should commerce for any reason develop. I had journeyed up the Yukon by steamer and had found that the steamers grounded on sandbars frequently, although the pilotage was expert, the channels were well buoyed, and the ships drew only | four and a half feet of water. On the Mackenzie, with no buoys for the channels, with pilotage not so expert and with a boat drawing _ six and a half feet of water, we had navigated without difficulty — an approximate distance of thirteen hundred miles—from Smith | Rapids on the Slave River, which is the only serious obstacle -to | navigation on the system, across Slave Lake and down the Macken- | zie River to the head of the delta. Through the delta I had passed — several times, commonly in boats of shallow draft, but once with | a boat drawing about five feet. If we could survey the various | channels of the delta and find that any had a depth of five feet or more all the way to the ocean, the knowledge might be of great importance. It would be so not only to the Hudson’s Bay Company | and other traders already in the quarter, but to the public in gen- eral should a strike of gold or oil or other commercial development ever bring people into that valley as they had been brought sud- — denly some years earlier into the Yukon valley. | So I gave it as my intention to go from Point Barrow myself THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 71 to the Mackenzie delta to purchase dogs, hire Eskimos, buy gasoline launches if they were available, and otherwise make all preparations for extensive work in the delta by our topographers, Chipman and Cox, the following spring. The preliminary task of surveying the coast between the International Boundary and the mouth of the Mackenzie might be finished in March, so that work on the Macken- zie channels could be begun by sled before the river broke open, and continued by boat, including soundings, from about the end of May until July when the surveyors would proceed to Herschel Island to rejoin the Alaska on her way eastward towards Coronation Gulf. But the main item of the instructions of the Government to the expedition had been that we were to explore the ocean north of Alaska and west of the already known Canadian islands to ascer- tain the presence or absence of new lands, and to do soundings and carry on other geographic and oceanographic work. I said that it seemed to me this part of our program could still be carried for- ward. Supplies to reinforce the outfits of the Mary Sachs and Alaska could be purchased either from the Belvedere or Polar Bear, or, should they be short as they might be, from the two traders, “Duffy” O’Connor and Martin Andreasen who were wintering on the coast between Collinson Point and Herschel Island. These sup- plies together with those on the Alaska and Mary Sachs would be adequate for carrying out next summer the Alaska’s program of going east to Coronation Gulf, and the survey work for the Macken- zie in the spring. ‘They would also provide a small party for a journey north over the ice to carry out our main geographic program. The report then gave attention to what the expedition’s pro- gram would be if next year the Karluk turned up safe, and what it would be if we had to carry on without her. In the latter event | we would especially need some scientific instruments, and these I asked to have shipped to Herschel Island via Edmonton and the Mackenzie River, which is the earliest and safest route. Other important but less essential supplies not obtainable from whalers or traders I asked to have sent in by ship through Bering Straits to Herschel Island. Summing up the report: (1) With the resources we had or could get we intended to do as much work this year as we could. (2) This year and the years following, whether the Karbike was lost or not, the expedition intended to try to carry on according to original plans, both in the Coronation Gulf district where de- tailed scientific studies would be pursued, and in the Beaufort Sea 72 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC and Parry archipelago where the main object was geographic dis- covery—the traversing and study of unexplored seas, the discovery and mapping of unknown lands, and the further survey of islands already partly known. This report, mailed from Barrow in November, reached the De- partment of Naval Service in February. Independent reports and requisitions had also reached them from the station of Anderson’s southern division at Collinson Point, which at the time they sent them had not heard (except through unreliable Eskimo rumors) from the Karluk or from me since the news of us they got when they followed us east around Barrow last August. The Naval Service also received a telegram from me sent later with the midwinter mail from Fort Macpherson. The Department replied to all these communications by sending the following telegram to the telegraph — office nearest Herschel Island, distant about one month’s rapid journey by dog sled: Ottawa, 28th February, 1914. “V. Stefansson, Care of Superintendent J. D. Moodie, Royal Northwest Mounted Police, Dawson, Yukon. ? “Your reports from Barrow and wire from Macpherson received. Your decision to pursue expedition as per orginal plans is approved. Trust you will soon have news of Karluk. “(Signed) G. J. DESBARATS.” This was a satisfactory message, especially the sentence: ‘Your decision to pursue expedition as per original plan is approved.” Although this telegram was justified by the outcome, and now seems the only logical one that could have been sent, it represented at the time a decision by the Department of Naval Service which showed a realization of arctic problems, and a confidence in our prognosis of how they could be met under altered conditions not exactly reflected in the press. For while the Department were de- ciding to approve my plan of going ahead, the newspapers were saying that the entire complement of the Karluk had perished, that my plans were unsound, and that the expedition had failed. Edi- tors especially, who presumably had been through high school, were asserting that all the knowledge ever gained in the Arctic was not worth the sacrifice of the life of one young Canadian. I am one of those who think the fighting of the Great War worth while not so much to attain what was attained as to prevent what THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 73 has been prevented. But I never could see how any one can extol the sacrifice of a million lives for political progress who condemns the sacrifice of a dozen lives for scientific progress. For the ad- vance of science is but the advance of truth, and “The truth shall make you free.” As this book is going through the press I have received a letter from one of the. scientific staff of our expedition who saw several of his companions die in the North, and then went home to serve four years on the western front to see men die by the thousand. Meantime some of us, his former colleagues, were carrying on the northern work. He is writing about a recent visit to him of one of our other men who remained in the North two years longer before going home to serve the last two years of the war. He says: “Tt was indeed a pleasure to learn at first hand of the work the expedition accomplished . . . and no less to hear of the men with whom I had had the honor to associate. My only regret has been, and always will be, that I was denied the honor of a more active association in these results. My enthusiasm for the study of polar problems has increased rather than diminished, and I should have been delighted to join Wilkins in his Antarctic venture* ... but unfortunately the war has left me a legacy in the shape of a weak _ leg as the result of wounds, which incapacitates me for arctic field work.” ** Thus men will always differ in their estimates, partly because of their nearness to or remoteness from the objective they judge; the soldier does not always agree with the editor. The battle for the advancement of knowledge is being nobly fought where doctors submit to malignant inoculations to test the efficacy of a serum, where experimenters breathe poisonous fumes through thousands of tests to perfect a process in economic chemistry, where astron- omers spend sleepless nights photographing the spectra of the re- mote stars. And the astronomer is not necessarily the least of these because it is least obvious just how his discoveries are to be applied to the problems of food and raiment. Nor are the principles established by the arctic explorer neces- sarily worthless because no one may see their commercial applica- tion, nor the lands he discovers valueless because corn will not thrive there and water frontages cannot be subdivided into city | lots with prospect of immediate sale. Their time will come. “The *The Cope Antarctic Expedition of which our Wilkins became second- in-command after the ena of the war. They sailed south in 1920. ** Letter to the author from William Laird McKinlay; dated May 27, 1920. 74 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Far North” is a shifting term. The Romans considered the middle . of France too frigid ever to support a high civilization. Fifty years ago the Arctic was supposed to stretch a long arm down to where now stands Winnipeg with its 200,000 people, and it was debated if potatoes could be successfully cultivated in that part of Sas- katchewan which is now known to be nearly if not quite the world’s greatest wheat country. So the “Far North” will continue retreat- ing till the Arctic that is unpeopled with our race shall have shrunk far within the technical arctic circle as laid down by the mathe- matical astronomer and geodesist. The lands commonly supposed to be covered with ice are even now covered with grass; the “eter- nal silence” of the North exists only in books; the “vast arctic deserts where no living thing can flourish” are the abode of fat herds of indigenous grazing animals winter and summer—as you will see if you read on in this book. The “Far West” is gone. But in the North is a greater frontier than the West ever was, stretching across Canada and across Si- beria. The commercial value of the remotest arctic islands will be seen ere we die who now are young. To those of broad outlook it needs no commercial development to justify polar exploration, or any honest attempt to widen the bounds of knowledge. Though we hope for commercial develop- ments from the Canadian Arctic Expedition of 1913 to 1918, we need not await them for justification. More than a dozen volumes of scientific results are partly written (some of them are printed), and charts of new lands have been published as a result of the decision represented by the telegraphic order issued at Ottawa when to those of defeatist temperament everything looked black: ‘Pursue expedition as per original plan.” CHAPTER VIII THE JOURNEY TO COLLINSON POINT HILE at Barrow this time I observed that the average W\ temperature of the Eskimo houses was lower than it had been with the Eskimos I had lived with farther east. Mr. Brower told me that when he first came to Barrow (I think about 1881) the Eskimo houses had been much warmer than now. The reasons for the difference were mainly two. The people had gradu- ally changed their more comfortable and sanitary earth-and-wood houses for the nowadays more fashionable and flimsy frame build- ings of imported lumber; and fuel had grown scarcer and more expensive. Mr. Brower and others also gave information that the age of matur- ity of Eskimo women is on the average higher now than it was ten or twenty years ago. JI made no connection at the time between the fact of the colder houses and the fact of the deferred maturity of the people who dwell in them, and so lost the invaluable opportunity of discussing the conclusion I later arrived at with Mr. Brower, who is an accurate observer, a keen reasoner and has had unequalled opportunities to study the Eskimos during their transition from their native mode of life which was unaltered when he settled among them to the present half- understood and often misapplied “civilization.” It has been generally supposed that among the peoples of the earth the age of maturity comes earliest in the tropics and increases gradually as one goes northward through the temperate and eventually to the edge of the polar zone. It has been presumed that a similar condition would be found in going south from the equator towards the southern pole. If the age of maturity increases with fair regularity as one goes north through Europe from Sicily to Lapland, it would seem there is a direct connection with the decrease in temperature, and this assump- tion has accordingly been generally made. Tables, the sources of which are not always unassailable, have been published to show this direct con- nection between the age of maturity and the temperature. But in North America this rule, if it be a rule, has a striking excep- tion. It is not rare among Eskimo women that they have their first child at the age of twelve, and children born before the mothers were eleven have been reported in places where the age of the mother can be 75 76 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC in no doubt because of the fact that her birth had been recorded by a resident missionary. Cases of this sort were first called to my attention by Dr. H. R. Marsh,* a medical missionary of the Presbyterian Church, who had al- ready been long resident at Barrow when I first came there in 1908. It is only where missionaries are stationed that reliable records are obtainable, for the Eskimos themselves do not take any interest in their own age or the age of their children as measured in years, and it is seldom possible to know how old a person is unless his birth can be checked up by comparison with some known visit of an explorer, whaling vessel, or some event of that sort. It is easy, however, among uncivilized Eskimos, at least, to get information accurate in every respect but that of age about the coming to maturity of girls, for they have no such taboo as we on the publishing of that sort of information. This taboo, like all our other social prohibitions, is soon picked up from us when Eskimos become “civilized.” Since the early maturity of Eskimo girls was first pointed out to me by Dr. Marsh, I have had a chance to observe a considerable number of Eskimos through a period of twelve years, and in many cases when it has been possible to check up the age correctly, I have found the time of maturity to be about as given by him for Point Barrow. But I have a general impression that in the places where I have been the age of maturity is now getting higher gradually. (As shown later, and mentioned above, I connect this with the poorer clothing and colder houses of the present as compared with previous generations.) When I first learned of this low age of maturity among people living in a cold climate, I supposed I had found evidence for thinking that racial difference, or possibly kind of food and manner of life, had much more importance than previously considered in determining the age of maturity, and that the general correspondence, if there is such, between the increasing age of maturity and decreasing temperature as one goes north through Europe would be found to be partly a matter of accident. It is a curious thing that during twelve years of associa- tion with the Eskimos during which time I have spoken and written a good deal about their manner of life, it never occurred to me until during the writing of this book that their rapid development is strictly in accord with the supposition that the hotter the environment the earlier the maturity. For to all intents and purposes the typical Eskimo in the country known to me lives under tropical or subtropical conditions (or at least did so until the last few years). The winter of 1906-1907 I recordeé¢ the estimate that the average temperature within doors of the Eskimé house in which I lived at the mouth of the Mackenzie River, was ¢ * For an account of Dr. Marsh and his activities, see the various reference: to him in the index to “My Life With the Eskimo.” THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC (ii good deal above 80° F. and frequently rose to 90° F.* From the point of view of those who spent most of the winter indoors in that house, it was a matter of no consequence that the temperature was perhaps forty or fifty degrees below zero outdoors, when the outdoor air seldom came in contact with their bodies. And even when these people went out, the cold air did not have a chance to come in contact with them except for the limited area of the face. When an Eskimo is well dressed, his two layers of fur clothing imprison the body heat so effectively that the air in actual contact with his skin is always at the temperature of a tropical summer. It is true, therefore, that while an Eskimo is indoors his entire body is exposed to a local climate as warm as that of Sicily, and when he is outdoors he carries that climate about with him inside of his clothes and applicable to ninety or ninety-five per cent. of his body area. If it be supposed that early maturity in such a country as Sicily is due to the direct effect of heat upon the body, in some such way as when heat brings early maturity to flies cultivated under experimental conditions, then we see that on that theory the Eskimo has every reason to mature about as early as the Sicilian. The same conclusion follows if we consider that early maturity is due to the acceleration of the proc- esses of metabolism due to the strain upon the body in adjusting itself t) excessive heat. When an Eskimo comes into such a house as the one in which [ lived in 1906-1907, he strips off all clothing immediately upon entering, except his knee breeches, and sits naked from the waist up and from the knees down. Cooking is continually going on during the day and the house is so hot that great streams of perspiration run down the face and body of every inhabitant and are being continually mopped up with handfuls of moss or of excelsior, or, according to later custom, with bath towels; and there is drinking of cup after cup of ice water. At night the temperature of the house will be only ten or fifteen degrees lower; or if it drops more, people will cover up with fur robes instead of sleeping nearly uncovered, thus keeping up the heat of the air that '\ is in actual contact with the body. We have, therefore, produced locally ‘) within doors the same conditions which may be supposed to accelerate | the metabolism of a dweller under the tropical sun. , The effect of the over-heated houses is more direct among the Eskimos ‘| upon the women than upon the men, for they remain indoors a larger part of the winter. So far as the warmth of the body out-of-doors is 7 * Bartlett estimates the temperature within doors in winter of the houses _of the Eskimos and Eskimo-like people of Northeast Siberia at 100° F. See “Last Voyage of the Karluk,” p. 211. To judge by his account these Sibe- rians do not ventilate their houses as well as the North Alaskan and Macken- zie Eskimos used to do, although his description of the foulness of the air is only a little more lurid than one that would be true of some of the Barrow Eskimo houses to-day that are cold because they are chilled through the thin walls by conduction and because fuel is scarce. In such houses every crevice by which cold air might get in is stuffed up with something. Not infrequently the keyhole is plugged with chewing-gum. 78 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC concerned, the conditions are even among the sexes, for they are equally warmly clad. If an Eskimo ever becomes uncomfortably cold, it is likely to be on a rainy or foggy day in summer or autumn when he is wearing his old clothes so as to save the better ones from injury through wetting. Among the Copper Eskimos of the vicinity of Coronation Gulf consid- erable discomfort is suffered occasionally from cold, especially in the fall. But these people who do not usually count above six have no ac-. curate idea (in years) of the ages of their children that are nearing maturity and we have no reliable data on this head from them as yet. They are, therefore, left out of this discussion. In countries like Europe where the clothing, whether it is of cotton or of wool, is generally porous, forming a poor protection against the weather and especially against a cold wind, and where the houses are similarly badly adapted for shutting out cold (like the modern ones at Barrow), and where temperature within doors is controlled by fires that, for one reason or another, cannot be uniformly maintained, it is gen- erally true that the farther north you go the colder the air that actually reaches the bodies of the people and has an effect upon their life proc- esses. In North America among the Indians, as one goes north from Mexico towards the Arctic Sea, similar conditions generally prevail, and the farther north the Indian the colder the air that is in contact with his body throughout the year. For the Indians (other than the Eskimos or Eskimo-Indians) like Europeans, generally wear clothing ill-suited for keeping the body warm. The most northerly of the Athabasca In- dians, for instance, appear to suffer a great deal from cold. One winter I traveled about for several months with the Dog-Rib and Yellow Knife Indians.* I found they were so poorly clad that dur- ing the day when out of doors they had to be continually moving, for if they stopped for even half an hour at a time they became so chilled that their hands became numb. These Indians are really in continual fear a large part of the winter of ever ceasing from active motion when out of doors. In the evenings their wigwams are cheerful with a roaring fire but by no means comfortable, for while your face is almost scorched with the heat of the flames, your back has hoar-frost forming upon it. At night the Indians go to sleep under their blankets, covering up their heads and shivering afl night so the blankets shake. It is, therefore, in accordance with the theory that the age of maturity increases with the increased cold of the air applied directly to the body, to suppose that the statements of Hudson’s Bay traders and others in the North are reliable when they say that the common age of maturity of Indian girls is as high as, or higher than, that of north European whites. But when you go north from the Slavey and Dog-Rib Indians to the Eskimo country the conditions suddenly change. You now come in con- *See various references to Slavey, Dog-Rib, Hare and other northern Indians in “My Life With the Eskimo.” THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 79 tact with a people who have (or had, till they became “civilized”) a sys- tem of living almost perfectly adapted to a cold climate, while the north- ern Indians have a system almost unbelievably ill-adapted to the condi- tions in which they live. Here, accordingly, you have a sudden shift back to a sub-tropical early age of maturity which at first seems to be a direct contradiction of the accepted theory, but which when properly understood is in accordance with it.* Spring work was commenced by sending Jenness, Wilkins and the Eskimo, Asatsiak, to precede us to a fishing lake back of Cape Halkett where they were to attempt catching fish in quantity for dog-feed, so that later on we might use them for our Journey from there east towards Collinson Point. A few days later the rest of us followed, except Pauyurak who wanted to leave our service. He told me that when he had worked for white men before he had usually stayed in the ship most of the winter and when he traveled he had been in the habit of riding, but he found in traveling with us not only that he didn’t stay in one place very long but that when he traveled he had to run. He seemed to consider this latter partly a trial and partly an indignity. That being his frame of mind, I was very glad to have him remain behind at Cape Smythe. At Cape Halkett a little later we lost Asatsiak. Somebody in that community picked him out for a desirable son-in-law. That seemed to meet his ideas and we had to forget that he had promised to work for us for three years. As I have had occasion to remark before, the attitude of an Eskimo towards a contract seems to be about the same as the attitude of a sovereign state towards a treaty ,—it is an agreement to be kept if it suits you to keep it and to be abrogated whenever you feel that your interests are better served that way. The defection of these two Eskimos did not hamper us especially as we had picked up a good traveling companion in Angutitsiak, a Point Hope native whom we found at Barrow. He served the expedition well for three years, first with me on this trip and later with Dr. Anderson in Coronation Gulf. We left Jenness and his interpreter, young Alfred Hopson, with the Eskimos of Cape Halkett and proceeded eastward. How this crossing of Harrison Bay impressed McConnell is shown by an | Interview given the New York Times several years later (Septem- ber 18, 1915). His enthusiasm and worshipful attitude in the inter- t) view are to be explained (unless they are due to the reporter) by ie *See The Journal of the American Medical Association, Sept. 4, 1920, _) “Temperature Factor in Determining the Age of Maturity Among the Eski- Mos,” by V. Stefansson. 80 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC the fact that after having “perished amid a wilderness of ice,” in the newspaper announcements of a year earlier, I had now just come dramatically to life in the front-page headlines. Apropos of my resuscitation an interviewer had been sent to McConnell, who then was in New York, with result in part as follows: ““. . . Those down here who thought he was dead did not know him. ... You see the Stefansson they had met at banquets and functions became another man entirely when he left civilization be- © hind him. I know because I traveled with him all one winter. He is at home in the Arctic. . . . The secret of his long so-called impos- sible trips is that he knows how to take care of his men and dogs. His sense of direction seems almost intuitive. I have never seen him become confused as to direction. On one occasion I followed his lead through a blinding snowstorm for hours. . . . The last two hours were made in darkness yet at the finish he was not over a hundred yards off the trail. I say ‘off the trail’ but in fact there was no trail. “At another time I followed him across a bay for forty miles. He made his own trail and at the end of the forty miles we came to . . . the small sandspit (he was aiming for).” These things seemed extraordinary to McConnell, and Wilkins has told me that they appeared equally extraordinary to him, but they were really very simple. To begin with, I knew the country. It is a region where only three kinds of wind blow. The strongest is from the southwest, the next strongest is from the northeast, and the third is from east-northeast. Occasionally there is a little wind from some other point but in general the snowdrifts are deposited by one of these three winds. Commonly you know as a matter of recent history which of the three winds it was that blew last, but in any event an examination of the ground will easily show which it was. On the same principles as are employed by stratigraphic geologists, you can tell by size and other characteristics which drifts were made by the strongest winds, and furthermore you can tell the | direction of the wind by the fact that the drift is lowest and narrow- |} est to windward and gets higher and wider to leeward before finally “4 dropping down abruptly to the general level. After as many years | as I have had of arctic travel it would be strange if I could not ‘9) tell at a glance, where only three kinds of drift are involved which was the S.W. drift, which the N.E. and which the E.N.E. 7} And if it was dark so I couldn’t see I could tell the shapes of the |} drifts by stopping and feeling them carefully with my feet, or if | necessary by dropping on all fours, crawling about and examining THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 81 them with the hands. Then, having determined either the N.E. or the S.W. drifts, the whole remaining problem is to cross every such drift at an angle of about forty-five degrees, ignoring all the other drifts. By doing this you are really traveling the compass course 8.E., which takes you from our starting point on the west side of Harrison Bay towards a gap about four miles wide between the mainland and the Jones Islands on the east edge of the Bay. I knew if I erred by going too much to the right I should run the danger of getting tangled in the grassy mudflats of the Colville River where the traveling is very bad on account of the soft snow in the tall grass. So I made sure that if I did err it should be by going too much to the left, in which case again I would strike the rough ice outside of the Jones Islands. This was a two days’ journey made largely in thick weather, and there was such chance for error that it was largely a matter of luck, although the reasoning and method were correct, which made me strike, as McConnell has said, within a few hundred yards of the desired place. However, I did not strike quite as close as he thought. I had noted some time before we got across the bay certain knobs of rough ice which indicated that I was a little too far to seaward and so I turned slightly to the right. There was also the performance which impressed McConnell and | Wilkins (and which Wilkins has since written about) of announcing | to them in advance, a day or two after this, when we were in thick weather and when the coast appeared to them to be absolutely fea- | tureless, that in a mile or so we would arrive at a platform cache | which I had seen some years before. This was merely a Sherlock Holmes trick, for the coast was not featureless but was merely | featureless to their inexperienced observation. I had been up and down it so often that I knew every cut-bank, and my last Journey had been only a year before so that the topography wag still vivid. To forecast your arrival at an ancient Eskimo camp a mile after passing a creek mouth is no more wonderful than knowing that a | fifteen-minute walk will take you to the Flatiron Building from the Washington Arch. When we got as far us the mouth of the Shagavanaktok River we had a series of trivial though rather instructive adventures. We _ \came upon a sled trail running to seaward and followed it ashore to ja camp the characteristics of which told me two things: One was _ \that it belonged to my former traveling companion, Natkusiak,* | | *See “Life With the Eskimo.” Natkusiak was with me most of the four , lyears covered by that book. 82 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC and the other that there must be the carcass of a whale to seaward. Evidently the sled trail led to this carcass. We were beginning to run short of dog-feed, so the next day I sent McConnell and Angutitsiak with a sled to discover the whale and get a load of meat. During that day I decided to walk out to Cross Island, for we were now abreast of it, thinking that if the Karluk were to the east instead of to the west Bartlett might have sent a message ashore and left a communication there for me. It was about a fifteen-- mile walk to the island. When I got there I found no message from the Karluk and no sign of human visits during the present winter. This was the time of year when the days are shortest. In a certain sense there are no days at all around Christmas, for the sun is well below the horizon and the light at noon even on a clear day is only a bright twilight. It had been cloudy all along and | began to snow on the way home. Therefore I had before me in — finding camp one of the interesting problems which continually | confront the arctic hunter and the solution of which is as absorbing to me as that of a problem in chess. Any Eskimo or experienced white man is careful to have his camp near some landmark, preferably one of a linear nature. In other words, pitching your camp near the foot of a conspicuous round hill would be of little service in finding your way home, for | whenever the weather became thick or the night dark you would be © unable to see the hill from any distance. The landmark of most | use is a long, fairly straight ridge or a cut-bank conspicuous enough | and characteristic enough not to be overlooked or mistaken for © another. Our present camp, which was the Eskimo camp from |} which its owners were temporarily absent, was at a cut-bank on — the eastern edge of a river delta. To head straight for it I had to | go approximately south. But the first rule, if you want to find | camp in darkness or thick weather, is not to try making a straight | shot towards it. For if you do and miss, you will not know to which | side to turn to look for it. In my present case I was north of a | camp located on an east and west coast line. It would not be wise | for me, I knew, to set a course too far west, for if I did I should © get myself tangled among the delta islands and mudflats of the» river. Clearly, the thing to do was to make sure that I was going to | strike the land too far east, for not being a delta that land would | presumably be of simpler topography and I would merely have to |}, follow the shoreline west until I came to the camp. In fact, I}, thought I knew the coast, for I had passed it several times although}, I had never stopped there to hunt. On the present occasion, al-/ },, Ia oe THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 83 though we had slept a night at the camp I had not seen the topog- raphy, for we had arrived after dark and I had started for Cross Island before daylight in the morning. But I imagined that the camp was on a round point with lowland lying to the east and rolling hills commencing two or three miles back. With confidence in this analysis, I took the wind at a certain angle on my cheek, made sure occasionally with the luminous dial of my pocket compass that the wind was not shifting, and walked steadily so as to strike the land, as I thought, a mile or two east of the camp. I knew my rate of walking and timed myself care- fully. After awhile I began to worry a little, for I had walked about an hour longer than I expected without striking any land. It was now about nine o’clock at night with thick clouds and light snowfall so that it was not possible to see even a dark object on the snow background more than five or eight yards away. At the end of this superfluous hour of walking I had one of the surprises of my life, for I stumbled against a heap of stones. Now it happens that years ago my former commander, Leffingwell, wrote a geological paper in which he said that stones were absent from | the coast west of Flaxman Island, and that in a published review | of that paper I have pointed out that while stones are nowhere } numerous, I have in repeated journeys along that coast observed |} afew. I had seen Leffingwell since and found we then agreed that there were a few stones on the coast. But here I was stumbling over a heap of boulders that could not be called “a few” by any {reasonable stretch of the vocabulary. I sat down on one of them | to think. It first occurred to me that I might have struck to the west of the camp instead of east of it and that I might now really be up in the valley of the Shagavanaktok River, having by accident entered \the delta by a straight channel without striking any of the islands. I thought this over carefully and decided that it could not be. Daylight had lasted on my backward road until I was only eight or {nine miles from camp and I had then set a course to strike two miles east of it and I considered it absurd that I could make an error of more than two miles in a distance of eight. The conclusion iwas that I must be east of the camp. But this seemed also absurd, for observations in previous years had told me that to the east of the camp the land was continuous, with a low coastline and flat land back of it for two or three miles. And here I had stumbled against the face of a cut-bank covered with boulders that seemed like a Moraine. At first sight it would seem that this reasoning had led 84 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC to the absurd conclusion that I was neither east nor west of the camp, but the answer had to be that my observation of the land on passing it in previous years must have been wrong and that instead of it being a low land gradually rising towards the interior, it must be in reality a practically landlocked bay with a narrow en- trance which I had never noticed. I knew that this entrance could not be wide, for had it been I would have noticed it in passing the coast, which I had done both by boat in summer and by sled in - winter. Having decided that I must have discovered a new bay lying east of the camp, I also had to conclude that the bay might be of any conceivable contour and that the only safe thing would be to follow all of the coast line. This I set about doing. For awhile the bank was conspicuous and I could see the loom of it even in the darkness, but after awhile it became more sloping and lower and I had to be continually stooping and picking up handfuls of snow or scratching the ground to find whether I was on the grassy land or on the snow- covered ice. I knew I could not be more than about three miles from camp in a straight line, but I did not know, except very gen- erally, which direction this was, so there was nothing for it but to keep following every indentation of the bay. It took several hours, and I arrived home at one o’clock in the morning, having been on my feet about seventeen hours. I was, of course, not tired. When one is in good training almost indefinite walking leaves you still ready to walk farther, and I was in an especially good humor through having solved one of the most interesting problems of the sort I had ever met. It seemed to me an opportune moment to use it as an example for impressing a valuable lesson upon my companions and I accordingly gave them an extended lecture on the subject. It was only later it dawned on me that they might not have been much interested at the time, and it must be admitted that no one is likely to be in a very receptive frame of mind who has sat up waiting for hours expecting somebody to come home, and then fallen asleep to be awakened in the middle | of the night. It seems that on an earlier occasion I had impressed — on them what is really one of the first principles of arctic technique: | that if ever at night they came to the conclusion they were lost, — they should stop quietly where they were and wait for daylight. One of them now wanted to know why I didn’t follow my own rule | and sleep out all night. This was a point of view that had never occurred to me, for it had never struck me that I was lost. This incident shows that it takes years of experience with any THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 85 peculiar environment such as a desert, the ocean, or the Arctic, be- fore one can judge correctly between the merely spectacular and the really difficult. Here were two keen young men who had been lost in admiration over the elementary trick of using snowdrifts as a com- pass in crossing a forty-mile bay, and who could see nothing inter- esting or particularly worth explaining in the comparatively credit- able feat of finding a camp in darkness under the conditions I have just described. In my whole arctic experience there is nothing of which I am more tempted to brag than of these eight or nine hours during which I groped ahead amid falling and drifting snow through dark- ness, never doubting that every step brought me nearer to a camp that I could not see till I was within five yards of it. Every now and then I had to dig deep pits with my hunting knife to see if I was on land or ice. I never dared try to follow the shoreline exactly for I never knew when I should come to the camp and pass it unnoticed. So that no matter which way the coast line trended I always zigzagged it, groping my way inland and digging till I found grass or soil, then groping my way seaward till my dig- ging revealed ice. I knew the camp was not far away if I only could walk straight to it, but I also knew that though I was almost | sure to be able to figure out its direction, I never could figure out its exact location. Each time that impatience whispered to me, “Make a shot at it, you might hit it,” discretion answered, “Yes, but if you miss once you never will know if camp lies to the right or to the left, ahead of you or behind. Now you know it is ahead | and that you will inevitably find it at last. You will never for- give yourself if you allow yourself to get lost when you needn’t.” And so I kept on, groping, zigzagging, digging, now to find earth | and now to find sea, and I got home. But the trouble is that when I want to brag about it nobody seems to see the importance of the achievement as I do. After my lecture and its comparative failure, we seemed about to commence a discussion of whether I had or had not been lost when McConnell remarked that he and the Eskimo had been unable to discover the whale carcass. He confided to me later that the Kskimo had not seemed very anxious to find it. They had followed | the trail for awhile and when McConnell could no longer see it he | had assumed that Angutitsiak could, for he then retained his child- like faith in the infallibility in such matters of the Eskimos. But when after awhile he asked the Eskimo where the trail was, he answered that he had lost it long ago but was hoping to find it again. 86 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC The hope haphazardly to find again a trail which you have long ago lost may show merely a sanguine temperament, but I think McConnell was right in interpreting it to mean that Angutitsiak thought chopping whale meat for dog-feed would be pretty hard work. The next day I sent McConnell and Angutitsiak again to look for the whale, never dreaming that they might not find it, and went out for a walk in another direction. On the way home [I struck” for the place where I thought the whale would be and found it, with plenty of evidence of Eskimos having been there to get meat several weeks before. I also found a white fox dead in a trap, but I saw no trace of McConnell and the Eskimo. On coming home in the evening I found that they had miraculously missed that whale a second time. This amused me almost as much as it annoyed. But two days seemed enough time to lose, so we proceeded next morning towards Collinson Point, feeling fairly certain that we would fall in with Eskimos who could give us dog-feed. This proved to be correct, and the Eskimos also gave us news of interest. Natkusiak, I learned, had gone east to Collinson Point to pay a visit to our ships there, but a pile of seal and whale meat belonging to him had been cached in the neighborhood of my informant’s house. The next day we picked up all we needed from this cache and proceeded to Flaxman Island. Here we found Leffingwell in the house which had been built in 1907 from the wreck of the Duchess of Bedford. He had already spent several winters there, although he had made two visits to his parents in California, passing each time a winter in the south. The house had been added to and was rather palatial for those latitudes. He had an extensive library in several languages, one of his rooms was furnished with a roll-top desk, and altogether the equipment ranged from the sumptuous almost to the effete. But I must make clear immediately that while the outfit was elaborate it was in the main a relic of the times when he had been | } a tenderfoot and his tastes had not yet been turned towards sim- plicity by his experience in the North. The first year he was there | he had “lived well,” as the saying goes. He had no end of variety | of jams and marmalades, and cereals and food of all sorts. At the | }) end of the year he complained on arrival in San Francisco (or at least the reporters quoted him so) that he had had a very hard time. — }! He had been several weeks without butter and so many more weeks | without something else. How his tastes had altered in the seven |! years since then was best shown when McConnell volunteered to }? THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 87 cook breakfast the next morning and suggested that the breakfast might consist of oatmeal mush and hot cakes. This struck Lef- fingwell as an extraordinary suggestion and the genuineness of his surprise was clear from the tone in which he said, “Mush and hot cakes! If you have mush what’s the use of hot cakes, and if you have hot cakes what’s the use of mush?” This principle is the essence of dietetics in the North. The simplicity of living on few foods contributes not a little to the charm of the North which one does not appreciate fully till he comes back to the complex menus of civilization. I would not go so far as to say that you could decide which was better, mush or hot cakes, and then live forever on the one or the other. But if instead of one of these you select some complete food, such as fat caribou meat for instance, then it contributes considerably to your satisfaction in life from every point of view, including that of enjoyment of your meals, to have for every meal indefinitely caribou meat and nothing else. I am aware that this sounds like a joke to the ordinary reader, but it is truth to all who have tried it. I have never had experience with a man who did not protest in advance that he would be sure to get deadly tired of a diet of nothing but caribou meat, but I have never found a man who in actual practice did get tired of it. They invariably like it better the longer they are confined to it. This, of course, is no unique experience in the world. There are probably }no people on earth so fond of rice as those Chinese who get little else. And if it be true that there are Scotchmen who live mainly on | oatmeal, then it is certain that those Scotchmen will prefer oatmeal to almost any food. Leffingwell was able to tell us a good deal about the Alaska and | Sachs, making more explicit the information we had received at Cape {Smythe. Everything was going well. The men were living at Col- linson Point, but Charles Thomsen and his family of the Sachs were at a trapping camp six or eight miles this side. Most of the men would be at the camp except Dr. Anderson who would prob- ably not be at home, for he had expected to take mail to Herschel Island for the Mounted Police to carry to Dawson in January. | That everything was so well with our people was largely thanks jto Leffingwell. It was one of the best pieces of luck of the expedi- tion that he happened to be coming to the Arctic in 1913 and accepted my invitation to be our guest on the Sachs. Chipman, whom I had placed in charge of her to take her to Herschel Island where she was to be handed over to Murray, was new in the coun- try, though in every other respect a good man for his task. Al- 88 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC though an old hand in Bering Sea, Captain Bernard had never been on the north coast of Alaska. It was just here that Leffingwell’s local knowledge, of the kind the Sachs needed, was fuller than that of any other man. He has himself made the only good map of this part of Alaska.* This map shows the soundings by which vessels of light draught can follow the devious channels inside the “lagoon,” while protected from the sea pack by the line of reefs and islands that fence most of the coast from the Colville to Flaxman ~ Island. What was more, Leffingwell himself, first with the Anglo- American Polar Expedition schooner Duchess of Bedford in 1906 and later with his own private yacht Argo, had navigated these channels and was therefore an ideal pilot. So the Sachs, though she had been in some tight places with the ice between Point Hope and the Colville, had had little trouble when once she got to the “lagoons.” Dr. Anderson, who like myself knew the coast better (from -our 1908-12 expedition) by sled in winter than by boat in summer, had had more trouble bringing the Alaska through, though he got her creditably and without injury to the same wintering place, Collin- son Point. Here the schooners were frozen in, quite safe both of them, Leffingwell said, though they were not in a real harbor but merely protected from winter ice pressure by shoals to seaward. We were comfortable and had a good time at Leffingwell’s, but it worried my companions a little that we stayed three or four days. In fact, they had been worried a good deal on the entire journey east from Barrow by my conspicuous lack of hurry. Their book notions required heroism and hardship. J really think they felt we were falling conspicuously short of the best standards of polar travel in making a midwinter journey in comfort. If it could not — (as by the best canons it should) be a flight from death, a race with the grim terrors of frost and hunger, we should at least refrain from the almost sacrilegious levity of making a picnic of it. But it almost was a picnic and I at least was enjoying myself. For good or ill, we were evidently unable to affect the destiny of the Karluk in any way and so she was, in a sense, off our minds. Nearly every Eskimo we met on the coast (and we met more than double the num- ber that I have had the temerity to discuss in this narrative) was an old friend. Then there was my insatiable interest in the study and * This map has since been published by the U. 8S. Geological Survey in . connection with Leffingwell’s painstaking and excellent monograph on “The — }. Canning River District, Alaska.” THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 89 practice of the language which after six years I knew well enough to talk fluently although not nearly well enough to be satisfied. The beliefs of men of our own country often lack freshness to us because we have been familiar with them from childhood, and lack interest because we have outgrown most of them. But here were people in whose daily conversation unheard-of superstitions kept cropping out continually. When they were telling about their sealing experiences I could enjoy the intellectual gymnastic of trying to separate the biological knowledge from the superstition, the facts from the theories. Very few Eskimos are really liars, and still there is scarcely an Eskimo who can describe to you a day’s seal hunt without mixing in a great many things that never happened (al- though, of course, he believes they have happened). Their delight |in seeing you when you come, the hospitality and friendliness of | their treatment no matter how long you stay, and the continual novelty of their misknowledge and the frankness with which they lay their entire minds open to you—all these are not only fascinat- ing at the time but profitable for record and reflection.* | Continually there recurs to me the thought that by intimacy and junderstanding I can learn from these people much about my own ancestry. These men dress in skins, commonly eat their meat raw, jand have the external characteristics which we correctly enough ascribe to the “cave man” stage of our forefathers. But instead of \ferocious half-beasts, prowling around with clubs, fearful and vi- \cious, we have the kindliest, friendliest, gentlest people, whose equals jare difficult to find in any grade of our own civilization. They may not come up to all our high ideals (in which case the question may jalso arise as to whether our ideals are really high). They do not ‘\meet misfortune with a noble fortitude, but they have the happier way of refusing to recognize 1t when it comes. They eat a full meal ‘\though the larder be empty at the end. They may die of starva- tion (they hardly ever do), but if so it is usually their optimism that is at the bottom of it. Perhaps they have been dancing and singing for week after week, neglecting the hunt on the theory that to- norrow will take care of itself. It may be true as Shakespeare says of the valiant, it is certainly true of the optimistic, that they never taste of death but once. * For some account of the beliefs and mode of thought of the Eskimos, ee “My Life With the Eskimo.” For more detailed statement see “An- hropological Papers of the Stefansson-Anderson Expedition,” published by e American Museum of Natural History, New York, 1914. 90 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC One reason we stayed over at Leffingwell’s was to help him meas- ure a base for his triangulation, but the spell of bad weather lasted too long and he was not particular about doing it just then, so that eventually we proceeded towards Collinson Point without havy- ing done him this little service. The distance to Collinson Point was about thirty miles. Al- though the morning was fair, it turned out to be later one of the bad blizzards of the year, and we did not know exactly where Thom-- sen’s house was. But I did not want to pass it by, so we followed along the coast about two hours after the last twilight gave way to pitch darkness. Finding it was one of the feats that McConnell has since written about as an example of what by analogy to wood- craft may be called polarcraft. But that again was like finding your way about in your home town. I knew that certain places were suitable for house-building and others were not, and did not have to look everywhere for this house but only at certain places where it could reasonably be expected. I knew that Thomsen, being the ordinary type of white man, would be sure to build where drift- wood was especially abundant, and that driftwood accumulates only on a particular kind of beach—usually facing northwest in this dis- trict, as the high tides come with a west wind. It turned out when we found the house that Captain Bernard was there with his dog team. It had been a fairly long day, so the rest of our party stayed © overnight at Thomsen’s, while Bernard hitched up a dog team and — took me on to Collinson Point. Wilkins and McConnell arrived the | following morning, thus bringing to an end their first winter jour- | ney. In my eyes they had covered themselves with credit, for they had proved as adaptable to polar conditions as any men I ever saw— and Wilkins not the less of the two though he hailed from sub- tropic Australia and had never spent a winter north of England. | But, as intimated above, I think they were disappointed—here it was | | . almost Christmas time, this was the very middle of the dreadful | | “polar night” (so called because for weeks the sun does not rise), | and they had finished a three hundred-mile sledge journey without a hardship that came anywhere near storybook standards! CHAPTER IX * A PAUSE AT WINTER QUARTERS T Collinson Point I got the warmest sort of welcome, al- A though it could scarcely be said that they were glad to see me, for seeing me here meant that something had gone wrong elsewhere. From the reports of whalers and their own knowledge of the condition of the ice, they had inferred long ago that the Karluk was in trouble. The Belvedere, too, had seen our | smoke, as mentioned earlier, and had inferred from its position and | stationary nature that we were keeping up steam while held fast by the ice ten or fifteen miles out in the pack. The common whaler opinion was that we ought to have abandoned the vessel imme- | diately, coming ashore as best we could, for that is the method the whalers have always followed. As Leffingwell had told me, Dr. Anderson and three or four | other men were absent, having gone east towards Herschel Island | to get their letters and government dispatches into the hands of the Royal Northwest Mounted Police at Herschel Island, to be carried to Dawson by the Peel River Patrol in January. In Dr. | Anderson’s absence Chipman was in command, and the next day he gave me verbally a report of the situation and of the plans as they jstood up to the moment of my coming. Chipman reported it had been the opinion of Dr. Anderson that their resources were inadequate for doing, the coming spring, any jsurvey work except the coastline between the International Boun- dary and the mouth of the Mackenzie River. They had discussed \the possibility of surveying the Mackenzie delta but had concluded that it was too far away from Collinson Point and beyond their resources. They had planned, therefore, in addition to this coast survey merely a reconnaissance of the Firth River (sometimes called the Herschel Island River) which heads in the Endicott Mountains to the south. Contrary to my view, it was the view of Dr. Anderson, in which the other men had necessarily concurred hrough their lack of local experience, that no survey work either seological or topographical could be done in the middle of winter, }nd that everything would have to wait for the warm weather of 91 92 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC spring. It has always been my opinion that the arctic cold need not entirely prevent work of this kind and that some sorts of geolog- ical work can be even better done in winter than in summer, espe- cially in places where the wind keeps the snow away and in river canyons where the ice of winter gives more ready access to the foot of a cliff than is possible when the stream bed is full of turbulent water in summer. : One point that naturally interested me was that Chipman told me they had made a trial of my method of “living off the country” | and had found that it did not work. The account which he gave | me of their adventures in this connection sounded like the résumé of a comic opera. It seems that in the fall (as some said, to see if there were game in the mountains, and as others had it, to demonstrate that there was none), a party consisting of about half the expedition had made | a foray up the Ulahula River.* When a man hunts for a living seriously in the autumn months, | he gets up in the dark of the night. By dawn at the latest he leaves | camp and is eight or ten miles away, beyond the area from which | * Probably because the Eskimos who now occupy this country are immi-— grants and because none of the real aborigines or their descendants are living in the vicinity, the Eskimo names of two rivers in this locality seem | completely lost and in their stead we have the “Ulahula River” and “Jags River.” Ulahula is a jargon word which may have its source in some South Pacifie language, perhaps that of the Hawaiian Islands, and which in the “Pidgin” | used by whalers in dealing with the Eskimos, signifies “to dance” or “to celebrate.” The natural inference, then, is that the name Ulahula was given to the river by some whaler who knew that the Eskimos had either at a particular time or else customarily held dances or celebrations near it. This may connect the name of the river with the island at its mouth, Barter Island, which is so called because the natives from the coast eastward and! westward as well as Indians from the Porcupine valley and other parts of! the interior used to meet here for purposes of barter every summer. We have records of these meetings from many sources. I have talked with a number of Eskimos and some Indians who themselves took part in’ these meetings, and with Mr. Joseph Hodgson and Mr. John Firth, of the Hudson’s Bay Company, who were both stationed in the Porcupine valley as Hudson's. Bay factors while the Indians with whom they traded also made these jour- neys regularly to Barter Island. A somewhat smaller river east of the Ulahula is called the Jags. The origin of this name is definitely known. It is connected with a western Eskimo who was a raighty hunter in the employ of the whaling ships and who made the valley of this river his special hunting ground. At first he was a sober, industrious and efficient man but later he became so addicted to drink that his usefulness was greatly lessened. At the same time his real name was forgotten, making way for the nickname of Jags. When he died his name which had attached itself to the river was retained, both by the Hskimos and the whites. WINTER Quarters at CoLLINsoN Porn. Top Picture: In upper bunks, Cox and O'Neill. Below, Anderson, Chip- man, Leffingwell. At Table, left to right: Bernard, McConnell, Johan- | sen, Chipman, Leffingwell, O'Neill, Anderson, Brooks, Cox. Below: Ballou. ‘LUVLG DNINUOJL AH], ‘SAIAOJ[ ONIMV], SNIMTIM THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 93 game can have been scared by the barking of dogs or the smoke smell of the camp, by the time that daylight enough for good shoot- ing comes into the southern sky. He then uses to the best advan- tage the four or five hours of hunting light, going from high hilltop to high hilltop and examining with his field glasses every exposed hillside or valley. If he does not see game the first day, he hunts similarly the second; and if he finds none the first week, he con- tinues the second week. For it is an essential of hunting conditions that although game may be abundant in a large region of country, it may at any time be absent from any small specific section. But this hunting party, which was partly a picnic and partly a baptism in the hardships of polar exploration, was, from Chip- man’s description, a noisy rout of convivial spirits who seldom went far out of each other’s road and who in various ways gave the game ample notice to leave, if there was any game. Probably there was none, for the excursion only lasted a week and it would be ja matter of mere chance if in such a short trip game should be \iound. However, the trip served the useful purpose of easing their jconsciences, for now they knew that no game could be got and that |there was no occasion for them to do anything but wait for the spring in the orthodox way of explorers, reading the Encyclopedia \Britannica or penny novels, according to temperament, making long jdiary entries, listening to victrolas and having flashlight photo- | graphs taken now and then, showing the comforts and conviviali- ties of an arctic home. A report had been sent to Ottawa, Mr. Chipman informed me, so the effect that the fall hunt had been a failure and that there was*no game in the country, that winter would be spent in camp, and that when the weather became reasonably warm in the spring _jurveys would be made of the Herschel Island River and of the hun- jred miles or so of coast between the International Boundary and fhe Mackenzie mouth. When summer came the party would pro- eed to Coronation Gulf to take up the work which had of neces- ity been deferred a year through the compulsory wintering at Col- inson Point. Chipman being a new man in the country, it was easy for me 0 convince him that a far wider program was open to us. When showed him a copy of my report to the Government from Point arrow, outlining the project of surveying not only the Herschel sland River and the coast from the Boundary to the Mackenzie as they had planned), but also surveying and soundmg the Mac- enzie delta, he was delighted. Like any good workman he was — 94 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC anxious to do as much work and to have as much to show for his time as possible. Before my arrival the point of view had been that they could use for scientific and exploratory work only the resources which they actually had in their own personnel and in the dogs and sup- plies brought from Nome. My view was, on the contrary, that when the Government had an expensive expedition in the field with a large staff of scientific men it would be folly to hamper any of the - staff by confining their operations to what could be done with two or three dog teams and limited supplies, when good dogs could be purchased at a reasonable price locally and natives and whites | engaged to assist in the carrying out of a more extensive work. Groceries and other supplies were available for this larger program, - both from the whalers and traders along the coast just east of us and from the Hudson’s Bay Company at Fort Macpherson. I felt confident, too, that the Royal Northwest Mounted Police would assist us with whatever resources they might happen to have either at Herschel Island or Fort Macpherson. A few minutes after I arrived at Collinson Point Andrew Norem, the steward of the Mary Sachs, asked me for a confidential inter- view at the earliest possible moment. The Collinson Point party, apart from those who, like Thomsen, had trapping camps scattered about, were all living in a large log cabin originally built by “Duffy” O’Connor when he had his trading station there the year 1911-12, a cabin purchased by us and fitted up, with the kitchen in an alcove and a storehouse adjoining. With ten or fifteen men around in the evening when there was no outdoor work to do, it was not possible to talk privately, and I had to put Norem’s request off until next day. What he had to tell me then was that he thought he was going insane. He said that during his lifetime he had seen various men become insane and that his own symptoms were like some of theirs. In particular, he had occasional fits of despondency. At these times he not only felt that every one was displeased with him but even had the idea that they were persecuting him in a most malicious way. | If he lit his pipe he imagined that the tobacco had been adulterated = | with some evil-tasting and evil-smelling mixture. This usually made | him angry, although he sometimes had enough sense to realize that he was probably imagining things. On several occasions he had | induced one or more of the men to take a puff or two out of his | pipe and they had always said that the tobacco was all right. When | the fits of depression were on he took this verdict as a sign of con- — spiracy against him; but in his lucid intervals he realized that the | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 95 tobacco had not been adulterated and that the whole thing was imagination. Lately these fits had been coming on two or three times a week. They had never lasted longer than a day. After a first momentary doubt I was convinced that Norem’s case was serious. Chipman told me that Norem had been acting queerly for several weeks. Lately he had begun to tell members of the expedition in. confidence that he thought he was going crazy. Hereupon the camp was divided fairly evenly into two parties: some thought the trouble was really serious, while others believed it was merely a trick to get cut of doing his proper share of the work. “malingering,” although the war had then not yet enriched the com- mon vocabulary with this word. It seemed that after the two ships went into winter quarters, arrangement had been made that Charles Brooks, steward of the Alaska, should be in charge of the cooking one week and Norem, of | the Mary Sachs, the next. This arrangement had been in effect only a short time when Norem began to do his work badly. I found in | the camp a feeling against Dr. Anderson because of his leniency towards Norem, whom some of the men regarded as a plain shirker, | and I knew my decision was by no means popular when I took | Anderson’s view, confirming the arrangement that for the present | Norem should be required to do none of the cooking and should be | given the most healthful possible outdoor work, such as chopping wood, going with dog teams to fetch driftwood, and the like. I | also arranged with Captain Nahmens of the Alaska, who had a | trapping camp about six miles away, to invite him now and then for a visit. An apparently spontaneous invitation of that sort would be more likely to relieve his mind than an order directing him to | go out to Nahmen’s camp and stay there. ' For the time this plan seemed to work well and during my brief -|stay at Collinson Point Norem did not have the melancholia. Cap- _\taim Bernard and one or two of the others who had known and liked him in the mining camps of Alaska were rejoiced at the change, but others said that he was merely holding back so as not _jto give me any chance to determine from his tacties whether his _|condition was assumed or real. en CHAPTER X WE MEET DR. ANDERSON started eastward along the coast, encouraged by the enthu- siasm with which Chipman had received my plans for enlarging the work, and anxious to overtake Dr. Anderson before he sent away his mail, so that he could, if he desired, alter that report to the Government, eliminating the sections describing our lack of equipment and consequently restricted program and substi- tuting the more ambitious project which I had outlined from Barrow. But on meeting Dr. Anderson’s party about twenty miles east of Collinson Point, I found that his views and mine were far from coinciding. He insisted that we must abide by his program, which he had already sent off to Ottawa, and said that he did not believe | we had any right to purchase dogs and supplies or to hire men for the projected survey of the Mackenzie delta, nor did he think the Government would approve of these expensive and too ambitious | plans. He was of the opinion that the Mackenzie delta was too far | from Collinson Point and could not be successfully reached for survey work, and also of the opinion that no really useful work would be done in sounding the river channels. He considered we had been instructed to work in the vicinity of Coronation Gulf and | that we should practically mark time until we got there, husbanding all supplies and incurring the least possible expense no matter if this | economy did limit very narrowly the scientific work done. | My reply to this was that the instructions telling the expedition to do its first year’s work in the vicinity of Coronation Gulf had |] been originally formulated by myself, although issued over the sig- |}. nature of others, and that I could not but know exactly what they } meant. We had expected to reach Coronation Gulf this year, but |] now that we could not I took it as our duty to do as much as pos- | sible where we were. It seemed to me that as we had already im |}, the field an expedition with a large staff of scientists drawing pay a, and costing as a whole perhaps one or two hundred thousand dol- i lars, it would be folly to lose this entire sum just to save an addi- j. tional expenditure of fifteen or twenty thousand dollars. | 96 I STAYED only a day or two at Collinson Point and then | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 97 When it became clear that our views were so diametrically at issue, Dr. Anderson tendered his resignation, saying that he would continue as a scientist on the staff but would no longer remain sec- ond in command and in local charge of the southern section. He changed his mind about resigning when I pointed out that in that event I should have to put the party under command of Chipman and it would lead to an untenable situation to have him, a man of many years of experience and older, under the command of Chip- man, a young and inexperienced man no matter how competent. Anderson’s alternative was that I should stay and take local command myself. This I could not consider, both because it was not in accord with my judgment and also because I had already reported to the Government that I would not myself remain on shore in Alaska but would go north over the ice trying to fulfill the geographic purposes of the expedition. Exploration of the Beau- fort Sea had always been our main task and the main reason for | there being an expedition at all. This had applied from the earliest stage when it was under American auspices; and it was the car- | dinal point when I discussed the expedition with the Prime Minis- ter of Canada, Sir Robert Borden, at the conference which led to his taking it over as a Government enterprise. Later, at a meeting | of the Cabinet, to which Sir Robert invited me, I had again presented the same plans, receiving for them the approval of the Premier’s | colleagues. While partly conceding these points, Dr. Anderson still main- tained that as the Karluk had been lost, I had no right to divert }any supplies or men from any other section of the expedition to the part which the Karluk had been expected to carry out even though it had been the central part. Here I replied that I had purchased jthe Mary Sachs as a sort of tender to make herself useful wherever she was needed. The commander of the expedition must judge for himself the meaning of the instructions by which he was bound, and _\do whatever seemed to him within the purpose of those instructions. I could not escape the blame if the expedition failed; it was for me therefore to insist on the carrying out of the plan I thought most thkely to bring success. Dr. Anderson said he considered it impossible to explore the ‘Beaufort Sea with any resources which we could get in Alaska and that any attempt to do so would be abortive, resulting in the expen- diture of money, the waste of supplies and probably the loss of lives, without any adequate result. I thought our prospect of suc- 2zess good even with only the resources we already had or could a 98 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC scrape together. This amounted to another phase of the dispute over whether an exploring party can live by forage on the ice of the polar sea. I had full faith in that method and my colleague had none. The result of the discussion was that I refused to take Ander- son’s resignation and decided that he must remain in local charge of the Collinson Point base, advising him that he could protect him- self by making any written protests or declarations he liked, trans-- mitted to the Government directly, or through me, or in both ways. This clash was by no means encouraging, but I felt sure that Dr. Anderson on mature consideration would see the advisability of following instructions, protecting himself as I had suggested by putting his disapproval on record and assuming the position that he considered it his duty to carry out orders, irrespective of his opinion of their wisdom. CHAPTER XI MIDWINTER TRAVEL AND PREPARATION FOR SPRING WORK, 1914 of the engineer of the Mary Sachs, J. R. Crawford. He as well as several other members of the expedition had been hired on the understanding that they would work for the Govern- | ment during six months of the year and would have leave of absence | the other six, during whieh time they were free to trap or do what- | ever they wanted to do in their own interests. There had been three | reasons for my making this sort of agreement with some of the men. | First, they preferred that arrangement; second, it is generally inad- | visable to retain in a winter camp a large number of unoccupied men, | for friction will then develop and it is better to have them scattered, each on his own and doing something in which he is interested; third, it was a manifest saving of money to the Government to feed jand pay a man only for that part of the year when he is useful, \still having him at hand when he was needed the following \spring. Yet it must be said that this arrangement, although logical, did not work out very well, and before the expedition was over jall the men had been taken back on a yearly salary basis. | Proceeding east along the coast, we visited some Eskimo camps _jand then arrived at the winter quarters of the Polar Bear, now in -\charge of Hulin 8S. Mott. Besides the crew, the Polar Bear carried ja party of sportsmen, including two scientific men, from Boston, (Massachusetts, who had chartered her for a hunting expedition and _jaad been frozen in and obliged to winter. They were Winthrop S. Brooks, Joseph Dixon, John Heard, Jr., Samuel Mixter and George 5. Silsbee. Two of the original party, Eben 8. Draper and Dunbar Lockwood, had gone home overland in the fall with the captain and _)wner of the ship, Louis Lane, and his photographer, W. H. Hudson, rossing the mountains by sled, going south to the Yukon and thence jo the Pacific by way of Fairbanks and Cordova. | Not having expected to winter in the Arctic, the Polar Bear, \yhen she was caught by the ice, found herself with incomplete equip- aent and limited food supplies. One of the great needs in this _ountry for a party spending the winter is dog teams and sledges, | 99 | 4 he meeting with Dr. Anderson had taken place at the camp 100 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC and these the Polar Bear lacked. The variety of food was also small, and in the case of some items the party could have eaten in a week what they, through their strict rationing, made to last a year. If I remember rightly, their bacon allowance, for instance, was less than a quarter of a pound per man per month. About the only things they had enough of were sugar and flour, and I remem- ber their telling me, with the enthusiasm of a great discovery, that they had never imagined a “sugar sandwich” would taste so good. On occasions when I was there the sugar sandwich came at midnight —two slices of bread with granulated sugar between. | This group, four men from Harvard and one from Leland Stan- | ford, impressed on me more forcibly than any other single instance, although I have seen many cases of a similar kind, the superior | adaptability of young men of the college type as compared with | those of the type of sailor or ordinary laboring man. There were | also in the party one or two young high school boys from Seattle, | and Mr. Mott himself was an excellent sort. Accordingly, I heard no grumbling, but some of my companions who associated more with | the sailors told me that there was a great deal of dissatisfaction | with the food. Much of the conversation of these men was about | what fine things they were used to eating. In other words, what | struck the college men as an adventure involving the interesting discovery that a sugar sandwich could be as delicious as anything | they had ever eaten in Beacon Street, struck the sailors as a phys- ical hardship and social indignity. Going east from the Polar Bear fifteen or twenty miles, we | came to-the steam whaler Belvedere in the ice a mile or two off- | shore. She carried among other things supplies which she had | intended to land for our expedition at Herschel Island. She was now so short of certain kinds of food herself that she had already | arranged with Dr. Anderson for the use of some barrels of salt beef and salt pork of ours, for which she was to pay by giving the } expedition bacon the next year. As this bacon was to be sent in | from Seattle, its arrival in time to transfer to our ships at Herschel |} Island in August, 1914, was very problematic. Considering it as /} too much a bird in the bush, I asked Captain Cottle to give us in- J stead something which he had actually on hand, so he arranged pay- J ment in flour and canned milk, of which the Belvedere had a super- J abundance. It turned out that my distrust was well-founded, for although } the bacon had been ordered and an attempt made to send it in, it } did not arrive in time for connections at Herschel Island. As for /} THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 101 trading salt meat for flour, that I was delighted to do; on the basis of market values in Seattle and at the prices which then prevailed, the food value of a dollar’s worth of flour was far greater than that of a dollar’s worth of salt meat. Furthermore, having always looked upon the Arctic as abundantly stocked with meat, I have never seen the use of bringing any in. What we had brought was in deference to the food tastes‘of our sailors. Personally I have none too much sympathy with a man who has an abundance of caribou meat and must have bread with it, but I have far less with a man who, hav- ing caribou meat, wants to change off to salt beef now and then. _A great advantage, too, of flour over salt meat is that it is far more satisfactory for emergency dog-feed. It is not an ideal dog- feed, but mixed with other things it can be cooked up into a passable ration, while salt meat cannot be fed to dogs without the bother of soaking it first in several changes of water, and in the Arctic in most places water is in winter one of the hardest things to get. At the Belvedere I spent Christmas very pleasantly with Cap- | tain and Mrs. Cottle, old friends. There was no hurry about getting | down to Herschel Island, for I learned from Captain Cottle then \that the police did not intend to send their mail out before the | New Year. A day’s journey east from the Belvedere was another old friend, |“Duffy” O’Connor, who had been landed there with a trading outfit by a ship which had later gone away and left him. His goods con- \sisted largely of articles which our expedition needed badly. He was not making much of a success of the trading venture, for the j}compulsory wintering of the Belvedere just west of him had given jhim a competitor that he had not counted upon. So it suited }O0’Connor to sell out to me, and I arranged to purchase the lot for jeight thousand dollars, a cheap price for the locality at the time, lalthough high as compared with prevailing wholesale prices in the \trading centers of the world. | Ten miles east of O’Connor’s place, Captain Martin Andreasen _ was wintering with the North Star. He also was an old friend and » ja man who had been trading in these regions for a number of years. -\C had met him last at Point Atkinson east of the Mackenzie when [ spent several days at his camp there in 1912. Captain Andreasen and his ship, the North Star, were exponents bf not exactly a new but nevertheless an uncommon theory of arctic lavigation. The one idea familiar to those who read arctic books _\s that a ship for ice navigation should be tremendously strong, / iremendously powerful, and shaped in such a way that she has a 102 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC chance to be lifted up by ice that presses around her. This is the | theory upon which all explorers of late years have worked. The | traders who navigate the Beaufort Sea do not work on any such prin- | ciple, nor, in fact, on any principle at all, except that of using com- monsense and then taking their chances with almost any kind of | craft. For instance, when Captain Cottle was in command of the Ruby, in 1915, he loaded her so heavily with a deck cargo of lumber that | her hatches had to be battened down and even in a quiet sea she had | eighteen inches of water over her decks. In other words, he was | navigating a sort of submarine. This would have been considered a very heroic or a very foolish thing for an explorer to do, but | in a trader it attracted little attention. In addition to his crew | Captain Cottle had with him, as was usual, his wife, and on that particular trip he also had Mr. and Mrs. c Harding, who were going to establish a trading post for the Hudson’s Bay Company at | Herschel Island. Of course he could not have got in with the Ruby | in 1915 had it been an unfavorable ice season as in 1913. But in he did come, landing his passengers and his cargo safely at Herschel | Island. Such navigation as that of the Ruby cannot be said to be based on any system, but Matt Andreasen and the North Star had a sys- | tem that was very definite. The basic idea is that on most of the | north coast of Alaska and north coast of Canada the ocean is shallow inshore, with a number of rivers in the spring bringing - warm water from the land to melt away the inshore ice. It happens ‘ frequently that while the heavy ice still lies offshore so strong that no ice breaker yet constructed could possibly get through it, there is a lane of thaw water along the land through which a boat of very small draft can worm her way, following the beach. Andreasen had purposely built the North Star to draw only four feet two inches of water, loaded, and in place of a keel a centerboard that could be withdrawn into the body of the ship. He had demonstrated through several seasons that he could wriggle along faster than strong | whalers could bunt and break their way eastward. Andreasen had made no attempt to build the North Star strong, for he had a method of which he may have been the inventor, of dealing with the closing in of the ice around her. The ship was only about fifty feet long and could turn around almost in her own length. When he saw the ice closing in and there seemed to be no chance of getting out of the way entirely, he would select in the neighborhood some big ice cake that sloped down to the water’s edge | | ——_ THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 103 on one side. He would then steam full speed against this floe. The bow of the North Star was so shaped that instead of hitting the ice a hard blow, she would slide up on it, standing level because she had a flat bottom. Thus by her own power she was able to put herself half-way on top of the ice. The crew were prepared to jump out, fasten an ice anchor, and with blocks and tackle to haul the ship entirely up on the floe, so that when the ice cakes closed in and began to crowd each other their pressure did not come upon the ship but merely upon the ice on which she was standing. If this was a solid piece it was likely not to break, and as a matter of fact, on the one or two occasions when Captain Andreasen had been compelled to use this method the ice selected had stood the test. | Later when it slackened out and there was a chance to continue | navigation, a small charge of powder placed in an augur hole in the | ice would shatter the cake and let the ship down into the water again. | I have always been temperamentally inclined to deal with nat- jural difficulties by adaptation and avoidance rather than by trying }to overcome them by force. The Andreasen idea of ice navigation |was congenial and its application convincing. Since I had first | seen the North Star in 1912 I had admired her and intended to buy \her some time if I could; for with my theory that a white man can \live in the Arctic anywhere, supporting himself and his men and his dogs by hunting, a little ship like the Star, though she is capable jonly of carrying about twenty tons of freight, is as good as a much larger ship would be to those who work on the carry-all system. jAccordingly, I now arranged to buy her from Captain Andreasen, hlong with his entire trading outfit, and at a price under the circum- itances equally reasonable with O’Connor’s. Through buying the O’Connor and Andreasen supplies and _\hrough purchase and exchange of goods made with Captain Cottle and Mr. Mott, I now had supplies enough so that the entire program _ fseported to the Government from Point Barrow could be carried out, _ jith a remainder for Dr. Anderson to take east with him into _ oronation Gulf that was larger than his total supplies for that purpose would have been had the plans not been altered when I jame to Collinson Point. Our arrival at Herschel Island at the Royal Northwest Mounted Police barracks was just before the New Year. The post was under jhe command of Inspector J. W. Phillips, and he and the men under _ jis command did everything to make our party welcome. This “jas their natural disposition as well as a part of the hospitality com- “fon in the North, although they had also received instructions 104 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC from the Commissioner of the Royal Northwest Mounted Police, Colonel A. Bowen Perry of Regina, to codperate with the expedi- tion in every way they could. The police patrol was starting in a day or two for Fort Mac- pherson, which lies a little over two hundred miles to the southeast up the Peel River, just above the head of the Mackenzie delta. This patrol, made by the Inspector himself and Constable Jack. | Parsons, I was able to share. The journey revealed both men tem- | peramentally and physically well adapted for the sort of work they were doing. It is certainly true that the Royal Northwest Mounted Police is a force of men with a remarkably high average from what- ever point of view they are regarded, although they naturally vary among themselves and do not in every case come up to storybook standards. But these two could scarcely have been better adapted | to the work they were doing, a corollary of which is that they liked | it and hked the country. Parsons has never left it since, although | he left the Mounted Police service and is now a trader in the employ of the Hudson’s Bay Company at Cape Bathurst. Inspector Phil- lips had been north before and this was his second assignment to the Arctic coast. He made every effort to stay there as long as he | could, and when eventually ordered out he was able to get his | superiors to send him back North again. Just now he is not in the North, however, and admits that the country does not come up to | what it used to be. The climate and topography are still the same | but, as the Inspector puts it, “the place is getting too damned } civilized.” I found on this trip that Inspector Phillips had the important } qualification of being genuinely interested in everything that per- 4 tained to the natives. At first he had a hope of being able to learn | the language, but after a discussion of this subject with me he gave _ that up and confined himself like all the police inspectors before | him, to the use of the jargon, a sort of “pidgin English.” * 1 About the only people for whom it is practicable to try to learn Eskimo are missionaries who expect to devote their entire lives to |} the field. The principles of the language are entirely different | i from those of European languages, and in order to talk Eskimo }, you have first to adopt in general a different mode of thought. J, Then, like most “primitive” languages, Eskimo is so highly in- | 4 flected that all the complexity of Greek declensions, conjugations and grammar gives but a faint idea of it. Further, between ten J, *See V. Stefansson: “Vocabulary of the Herschel Island Eskimo Jargon,” |} published in the American Anthropologist, April-June, 1909. ) THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 105 and fifteen thousand words are used in everyday speech, which is a far larger vocabulary than is employed to-day by persons speak- ing any ordinary European language. When you combine the pe- culiar mode of thought with the complexity of inflection and exten- siveness of vocabulary, it is seen to be a task of intense application for many years to get a command of the language.* It is not so strange, therefore, as it seems at first sight, that there are white men who have resided for thirty or forty years on the arctic coast, with Eskimo wives and grandchildren, who never- | theless have so small a command of the language that when their own wives talk to their own children they have often no idea even of the subject they are talking about. Of those who have been long resident the exceptions known to me are Mr. C. D. Brower of Cape Smythe, and about five or six missionaries who during the last twenty or thirty years have worked in Alaska and north- fern Canada. Of the three expeditions with which I have been | connected, Mr. Leffingwell, the commander of the first, and Mr. | Jenness, the anthropologist of the present one, are the only men | who have even tried to learn anything beyond the jargon. With | Mr. Leffingwell, who is a geologist, the language was a pastime, but | Mr. Jenness needed it in his studies as an ethnologist and acquired jin three years a better command of it than I was able to in my \first three. i | Inspector Phillips turned his interest to the customs, beliefs and jmode of thought of the Eskimos as he could get them through in- jterpreters, and for that purpose he made good use of me while we \traveled together towards Macpherson, visiting Eskimos along the jroad and talking with our own Eskimo companions. Two bits of jinformation that came out on the journey seem interesting enough to relate. One evening Inspector Phillips and I were discussing the ques- ition of whether the missionaries as a whole had done a great deal jof good in the country. Taliak, an Eskimo I had just hired who jhad lived for a year or two with one of the Church of England “|missionaries, listened to the discussion and gathered from it that jwe were not as favorable in our attitude towards the missionaries as he thought we ought to be. As with any other Eskimo, the in- ensity and sincerity of his newly-acquired religious opinions are beyond question. He also wants it distinctly understood that they re beyond question. Phillips and I had not been paying special *See discussion of the principles of the Eskimo language in Chapter XIV of “My Life With the Eskimo,” Macmillan, 1913. 106 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC attention to him and had not noted that he was getting angrier and angrier, until out of the corner of my ear I heard him say to Sik- sigaluk, the Inspector’s interpreter, that there would be no Eskimos living to-day in the Mackenzie district if it had not been for the | missionaries. That remark I repeated to the Inspector, and sug- — gested that if he cross-questioned Taliak he would probably get at first hand some views about the missionaries that would be quite as. interesting as any he could get from me. So we turned to Taliak and asked him what he had meant. He said he had merely made a remark in Eskimo to another Eskimo, one not intended to be taken up or discussed with a white man; and it took a good deal of pressure to get from him what he had in mind. But it finally came out that he considered it well known that a few years ago there was a large body of armed white men over in the Yukon valley in Alaska who had come there for the purpose of making a foray across the mountains into the coast land to kill off all the Eskimos and take their land for occupation by white people. This purpose would undoubtedly have been carried out if it had | not been for the missionaries, who induced the Government to send the Royal Northwest Mounted Police into the country to protect them. At first this seemed so grotesque that it was difficult to deter- | mine any foundation for it. The explanation turned out to be a | garbled version of the incipient dispute between the United States and Canada as to the location of Herschel Island, it having been originally assumed by the American whalers that the island was } on the Alaska side of the International Boundary, and accordingly | that the Canadian Government had no authority over them when at | their winter quarters. The United States Revenue Cutter Thetis was sent to Herschel Island in 1889 to determine the position of the island, and found it to be well within Canadian territory. Later J the missionaries were doubtless in part responsible for getting the first detachment of police sent in to Herschel Island to establish J, Canadian law among the American whaling fleet there. From }) this boundary dispute and this effort of the missionaries to get’ police sent in, Taliak and apparently all the Eskimos of the district | had got the ‘idea that the police were protecting them from the j incursion of an army or a horde of armed people who desired to, | dispossess them of their land. . Another interesting point that came out on the patrol journey }: was that the Eskimos had a very definite opinion as to why the}, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 107 summer of 1913 had been such a very bad ice year. Siksigaluk, the police interpreter Eskimo, told us that during the summer when a large number of his people were at Herschel Island awaiting impatiently the arrival of trading ships from the west, and when in their daily walks to the top of the island they kept finding that the ice was jammed in against the land to the west of them, Mr. Young, lay missionary of the Church of England, told them that probably the Lord had sent the ice to keep the wicked scien- tists in the Karluk from getting into the country. From this re- mark the Eskimos had deduced, and very logically, that the same ice that was sent to keep the scientists out of the country had also | kept the trading ships out. For this reason the community were very resentful against us for the non-arrival at the island of the Belvedere, Polar Bear and Elvira! Later on at Fort Macpherson I saw Mr. Young and found that | he denied, no doubt with entire truth, that he had ever made any } such remark. However, the Eskimos got the idea somewhere, per- | haps from their own inner consciousness, and the fact throws an | interesting light not only on their mental status but on the some- | what external Christianity which they have espoused so warmly. Just as children may be kindhearted, attractive and in every | way charming and still believe in Santa Claus or even in Jack | the Giant Killer, so the Eskimos are no less a delightful people for all their childike notions. In common with nearly all other ob- | servers, I find them less charming as they grow more sophisticated, | but this should not be charged against the missionaries, for the sophistication is only in small degree their work. It is the aggre- | gate result of the intercourse of the Eskimos with all sorts of white -}men, and not the particular result of their intercourse with mission- jaries, which is changing them gradually into a less attractive and _jless fortunate people. | The second day out from Herschel Island on the journey to- ~|wards Macpherson we overtook in a deserted Eskimo house Storker -|T. Storkerson, who had been first officer on the schooner Duchess jof Bedford in 1906-07. This was the expedition with which I had tbeen connected as anthropologist, having intended to join it at |Herschel Island in the summer of 1906. On that occasion I had come down the Mackenzie River and arrived at the appointed jrendezvous in August, waiting there until September for the expe- \dition. They never got through that far, however, for the freeze-up overtook them at Flaxman Island, where the ship was eventually 108 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC broken up to build the house in which Leffingwell, one of the joint commanders, afterward lived for many years and where he had recently entertained us so hospitably. Storkerson was traveling alone. His family was living in the forested section about half-way up the Mackenzie delta, where he had left them to make the round journey of about five hundred miles to Captain Andreasen’s trading establishment near the Interna-_ tional Boundary. He was now on his way back home from what had been a hard trip, for he had lost some of his dogs by disease and had been compelled to harness himself to the sled to help the remaining animals haul the heavy load. From the first it had been my intention to try to engage Storkerson, who was about the best “all around” man it was possible for the expedition to get. I now found he had not been very prosperous in his trapping and had been spending his money quite as fast as he made it, so that he was glad to give up trapping for a while and join forces with us. There was enough of the poet about Storkersop so that he could see as well the romantic side of the search for undiscovered lands, and of such forays into the unknown. On the way up the delta I found that for purposes of negotiat- — ing with various residents I had to-travel rather more slowly than the police, and they preceded us to Fort Macpherson. About half- way up, in the same neighborhood in which Storkerson lived, were two white men, Peder Pedersen and Willoughby Mason, with whom I spent several days. They were on a diet restricted by the cir- cumstances of the entire neighborhood. It seems that the previous summer most of the Eskimos had made journeys either to Herschel Island to meet the traders, or to Fort Macpherson to meet the missionaries, during the time when they should have been fishing. When they returned to their fishing places the “run” for the year was largely over, and as a result nearly everybody in the delta was short of fish and on the verge of starvation. Fish are hard to catch in the delta in mid- winter, and it was a very bad rabbit year. Moose are uncommon and caribou usually absent. There was no danger of anybody actually dying of hunger but there was more than a possibility that some of the dogs might starve. Mason had come down the Mackenzie a few years before as a member of a party of prospectors who had with them two horses and carried a large quantity of corn for horse feed. The first year they had made hay for the horses with scythes (this was about two hundred miles north of the arcti¢ circle, by the way) and had fed them during the winter on hay THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 109 supplemented with corn. During the second summer they had come to the conclusion that their “prospects” were not going to yield much gold, some of their companions had left the country, and the horses had been turned loose to forage for themselves. According to native report, the horses survived much of the winter and it is probable that they were eventually killed by wolves. The thing pertinent to our situation was that about the only food of Mason and Pedersen was boiled corn from the stock originally brought in as horse-feed. I was Mr. Mason’s guest for about a week. This diet was a new adventure, and [ took to it enthusiastically. Two companions of mine were also guests, one the sailor Louis Olesen, whom we | had picked up in Nome, and the other the Eskimo boy Taliak, whom we had engaged on the coast. Both of them objected to | living on corn, the Eskimo because he preferred meat, and the | sailor because he was not a horse and had not joined the expe- }dition to live on horse-feed. That attitude amused both Mason jand me a good deal, and I think that while Olesen was there the diet was more strictly confined to corn than would have been the |ease otherwise. | During that week I worked out pretty clearly the details of \the delta survey program for the coming spring. I bought from |Mason a gasoline launch which had belonged to his mining outfit. |This launch, the Edna, was of the “tunnel-built” type, thirty feet jlong, and her speed was said to be sixteen miles an hour. She had jan excellent reputation with the Police, who had seen her come to Herschel Island (which necessitates from forty to sixty miles of jocean voyage, according to which branch of the delta one uses), land she had an adequate supply of fuel. Pedersen, who said he jhad been engineer on a gasoline tug in the harbor of San Francisco, jwas hired to put her in condition and to operate her. He and ‘|the boat were to be at the service of Chipman during the spring, while Cox was to have a smaller launch purchased from the \Belvedere. Between the two survey parties and the two launches "fp good beginning would be made on the survey. The Mackenzie Helta is a mass of islands and tangled channels like the delta of "pvery great river, and it was not reasonable to hope that a survey /pf all the channels could be made. But the experience of local vhite men and Eskimos had already shown which channels were the most hopeful for navigation by big ships, and these I expected jo get mapped and sounded. | Although out of chronological order, I will say here that this | 110 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC program was practically carried out, although it developed that Pedersen’s knowledge of engineering when running the gasoline launch in San Francisco had been confined to his ability to start and stop an engine that was in perfect condition and to hoist a distress signal when anything went wrong. Nothing went wrong with the Edna, except that there was too much oil in her cylinders and the “timing” of the electric spark was not quite right, but these simple difficulties were not understood; she could not be used ~ at all that summer, and Chipman had to do what work he could with a whale-boat. This cut down the extensiveness of his work by much more than half. The other launch with Cox in charge did excellent work, for he himself was a good engineer, thanks to which the aggregate of the work done by the two parties was almost as great as I had hoped, including the sounding of one channel with evidence that a ship drawing six feet of water can enter the Mackenzie from the sea. This together with what we know of the navigability above the delta shows that a ship draw- ing six feet of water can steam fifteen hundred miles up the river from the sea to the rapids at Fort Smith. In addition to buying the launches for the two survey parties, I secured from the Mounted Police-a quantity of provisions which were cached at strategic points in the delta, and made all necessary arrangements for the prosecution of their work. —— CHAPTER XII THE COLLINSON POINT DIFFICULTIES the engagement of Storkerson had set them a good deal for- ward, for they demanded a few very good men rather than a large number of ordinary ones. As soon as I could see clearly what the program in the delta would be, I wrote out a summary of it to transmit to Dr. Anderson so that the topographers, Chipman jand Cox, and O’Neill, the geologist, would know what facilities they might expect to work with. I also wrote out a second letter of instructions, giving in detail the plans for the outfitting of my own party for the journey north over the Beaufort Sea. Directions were that the outfitting base should be at Martin Point, about forty miles east of Collinson Point and fifteen miles west of the Polar Bear. Storkerson’s advice about the outfitting was to be followed in general, but in order not to disarrange Dr. Anderson’s routine, I asked him to put Chipman or some of his other men in direct charge of that work. Various details of prepara- jlons were included: tents of silk or Burberry were to be made pr altered, the sounding machine was to be overhauled by the jaarine biologist, Johansen; watches, purchased for use as pocket \hronometers, were to be carefully rated, and any chronometers vhich the topographers could spare me from their outfit were to je rated and put aside for my use. Storkerson was to be given the se of several dog teams and the men to handle them, certain sup- ilies were to be hauled from Collinson Point to Martin Point, and \ther supplies from the Belvedere and Polar Bear. Everything yas to be ready by the first of March for our start north over jae ice from Martin Point. | When these letters were completed, I gave them to Storkerson » take to Collinson Point, giving him Olesen and the dog team, yhile I purchased other dogs in the delta and kept the boy Taliak ith me. | When Storkerson started towards Collinson Point I proceeded 9 the river to Fort Macpherson where I completed my dispatches Bal | O far as my personal plans for ice exploration were concerned, | 112 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC to the Government, giving details of how the program which I had already sent to them from Point Barrow was being carried out. During this time I had the opportunity of many pleasant chats with my oldest friend in that country, John Firth, whom I had known since 1906, as well as with the police, missionaries, and traders both of Macpherson and of Red River. All of them were as helpful as possible and greatly interested and as a result, I ex- plained our plans more in detail to them than I did to most other - | people. It may be for that reason that later on, when we had disappeared from sight into the ice north of Alaska and were sup- posed to be dead by Eskimos and whalers es well as by the members of our own expedition (and by the arctic explorers in Europe and America to whom the Ottawa Government later referred for an opinion), Inspector Phillips and Mr. Firth were among the few who stuck to the idea that our plans were sound and that we were probably alive. One of the reasons why I had always wanted Storkerson as a member of the expedition was that I had full confidence in his energy and judgment in carrying out orders. So far as the prepa- ration of the equipment for the ice work was concerned, he was a far better man than I, and the best. thing to ‘do in that regard was to leave him alone. Dr. Anderson having been directed to put at Storkerson’s disposal facilities ample for carrying out all instruc- tions and plans for the ice journey, there was no need for me to | hurry back to the outfitting camp. It was enough to arrive at | Martin Point about the time when everything was ready, since a | day or two of rest would be all I should require before starting | out upon the ice. So I was able to be leisurely about completing the work in | | the Mackenzie, but once it was done I started promptly westward. |] On the third or fourth day, about fifteen miles west of Herschel Island, I met several sledges proceeding eastward. When I saw |. that they were ours and recognized the men with them, I realized _}, I was facing the most serious development of the expedition so far. For some of these were men who should have been now em- ployed at Martin Point, getting things ready for the ice trip. The written directions had been definite, and yet they had not only not |), been carried out, but things were being done incompatible with |. both their spirit and letter. J. J. O'Neill, geologist, proved to be in charge of this party. | He brought me a letter from Dr. Anderson. I asked O’Neill to | walk with me back to the police barracks at Herschel Island, |}. . a ia ee an, eo —— x THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 113 allowing the sledges of his party as well as my own to precede. us there. It seemed best to say nothing more to him before reading the letter. As we walked I read it. Together with O’Neill’s answers to occasional inquiries where some point was not quite clear, the letter made me understand that our situation could scarcely have been worse. Dr. Anderson, my second in command, acknowledged the receipt of my instructions brought to him by Storkerson and said that, after consultation with the scientific staff and with the other members of the expedition, he had decided not to obey them. He himself and the rest were of the opinion that my proposed journey north over the ice was a “stunt” to get me newspaper notoriety; | that no serious scientific work was intended; and that if any were | intended none could be accomplished on any such plans as I was | contemplating. They considered themselves justified not only in | withholding assistance for this journey, but also in preventing me | from using any supplies that were at Collinson Point on either of | the ships Alaska or Mary Sachs. . The letter then referred to the supplies of the expedition being | carried by the Belvedere and said that the writer and the scientific | staff would protest against Captain Cottle’s turning any of these | over to me, and would take the position that if I used any of them jit was “a criminal misappropriation of Government property.” |The criminal part must have been that Dr. Anderson interpreted . the Government’s instructions to mean that I had no right to these supplies for any work except that in the vicinity of Coronation . Gulf, and my using any part of them for the ice work would be disobedience to the Government. The wording of the letter, while it showed by its violence that it had been written in what might be fairly termed “the heat of passion,” left no doubt of the full sincerity of its writer and the staff. They were no stage villains bent themselves on being crimi- nal. In their own esteem they were acting in the public interest im trying to forestall misuse of public property. In the interests jf science they*®were preventing a foray into a frozen ocean which jn their opinion could yield no knowledge, predestined as it was fo failure through inadequate plans; and in the interests of human- ity they were discouraging a venture which, if carried as far as I aid I intended, would lead to multiple death through freezing or _ jtarvation.* * Dr. Anderson’s letter later had the following history. On leaving land jor the ice trip March 22, 1914, I left it, with other valuable papers and a 114 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC _ After I had read the letter, a conversation with O’Neill added light. Apparently members of the expedition had been discussing both with the local Eskimos and with the whalers my plan of walk- ing north over the frozen ocean with intent to depend for food and fuel on the animals we might find. The Eskimos considered the project suicide, saying that seals and polar bears would not be found at any great distance from land, and that we should inevi- tably starve if we did not lose our lives through some accident © | of travel over the broken and continually shifting ice. The whalers were of the same opinion. The members of the expedition then felt no doubt of the substantial insanity of my project, and no doubt that they were justified in taking steps to prevent me from carrying it out. They were quite sincere in their opinion that the Government at Ottawa and public opinion in general would sustain them in that position. A little quiet discussion with O’Neill shook his confidence a good deal. Before we arrived at the police barracks he told me that his mind had been changed so far that, although he could not very well go back on his agreement to stand by the rest of the Collinson Point people in their opposition, he would at least go so far as to give me his pocket chronometer. And then it came out that one of the conclusions reached by small sum of money belonging to a member of the expedition, in a locked iron box of which I had the key. This box was later placed in charge of the Royal Northwest Mounted Police at Herschel Island. During the spring | of 1914 the opinion grew stronger that my companions and myself had died out on the ice. This opinion was held, with two or three exceptions, by Eskimos, whalers and members of the expedition who were at Herschel /}, Island. On the theory that I was dead, my iron box was broken open. One J. reason assigned for this was to get for the owner the money which the box contained (I think about twenty dollars). When I arrived at Herschel Island a year later, Inspector Phillips of the Royal Northwest Mounted Police turned over the box to me with the explanation that it had been broken open by Dr. Anderson. I missed noth- ing from it except the money, which had been given to its owner, and the ‘jy letter. Desiring the text of this letter for the completion of the records of the expedition, the Deputy Minister of Naval Service of Canada in 1919 wrote | it to Dr. Anderson asking him for a copy of the carbon which, since the letter | was typewritten, he presumed the writer had retained. Dr. Anderson replied that he had kept no copy. He also stated to the Deputy Minister that my ' box had not been broken open by himself but by Wilkins. Wilkins was |]. asked if he had broken open the box. He replied he had not; and he did |} not really know who had, but had always understood it was Dr. Anderson, I referred the matter again to Inspector Phillips. He says he is prepared td to say both that he told me Dr. Anderson had broken open the box, and J} that he believed Dr. Anderson opened it, but that he cannot say positively Ty. that he knows he did. Anyway, the letter is lost. | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 115 | the staff at Collinson Point had been that I should probably be | unable to get a pocket chronometer, and that if they were to refuse |to turn any over to me I should be thereby prevented from going {out on the ice. Certainly to go without a chronometer would not j only put our lives in extreme danger, but would prevent us from | being able to say at the end of the journey accurately where we |had been. This would rob any soundings we might take, for |instance, of most of their scientific value. | O’Neill’s decision to give me that chronometer really turned jthe tide for me, for the chronometer point was the only one where |I felt myself legally weak. The expedition was under the Naval \Service, but the chronometers were the property of the Department jof Mines, and had been handed by them to the men who carried |them, who could make a claim on that ground that they were jnot part of the equipment of the expedition proper and therefore not subject to my requisition. . This watch was the one we relied on in our successful ice jour- jneys of the next several years and without which they could not Jaave been made. I have felt that O’Neill’s handing it to me jwithout either request or demand of mine was a pretty fine thing, n view of the fact that he seemed to be sincerely convinced that pur undertaking was stupid and was doomed. Only, he had the sporting fairness to feel that he did not want the mere lack of a feliable timepiece to prevent my having a chance to try it out. | O’Neill said in our conversation that before he and the other jaembers of the Geological Survey left Ottawa the question had heen discussed between them and their superiors as to what they vere to do if Stefansson’s conduct of the expedition did not appear ‘jo them to be the right one. He said that they had been assured jhat if they thought it advisable to disobey my orders, their posi- ion would be sustained at Ottawa. A day or two later O’Neill -pade that statement again to the police at Herschel Island, adding fat from the point of view of the Geological Survey, he and several f the other men were mere passengers on my expedition and not _jabject to my orders beyond their own discretion. At Nome sev- tal months earlier O’Neill had said the same thing to Mr. Jafet jindeberg and others, and it had been reported to me. I discussed with the representative of the Naval Service, Mr. George Phillips, ho advised me to dismiss the entire portion of the staff that had pen furnished by the Survey. My conviction then was, however, jiat this was mere talk on the part of the men and that in their vn interests they would refrain from bringing it to an issue. 116 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Furthermore, I knew that the Chief of the Survey, Mr. R. W. Brock, had never intimated in any way to his men that they — would be justified or supported in disobeying orders. O’Neill ad-— mitted, in fact, on being questioned that it was not Mr. Brock who had said this, but some one whose name he declined to give. O’Neill’s purpose in coming with the present party was to proceed up the Firth River for a survey. This was the survey planned and outlined in my dispatches to the Government from Point Barrow, and was one of the points where the plans as out- lined by Dr. Anderson coincided with plans as outlined by me. I had every interest in seeing the project itself carried through; what had disturbed me on meeting O’Neill’s party was not that it should be on its way but rather that it should have in it Captain Bernard | and Louis Olesen, both of whom should then have been engaged in helping Storkerson with the outfitting for the ice trip. Instead of these men O’Neill should have had with him other white men and local Eskimos with their dogs, an arrangement that would have served quite as well. Captain Bernard and Olesen now faced the unhappy question of whether they were going to obey my orders or Dr. Anderson’s. Olesen took the position that Dr. Anderson was his real commander, there having been two expeditions with two independent heads, myself in command of the Karluk, and Anderson of the Alaska and_ Mary Sachs. Captain Bernard expressed the opposite view, so I did not argue Olesen’s, for O’Neill had to have somebody to help ¥, him with his geological work and my opinion of Olesen was such) that I was well pleased to let somebody else have him. It had been O’Neill’s intention to proceed forthwith up the Herschel River, but as he had, in common with most of the men at Collinson Point, spent the entire winter in the house, he was so “soft” and became so badly laid up with the fifteen-mile walk from where he met me to Herschel Island that his departure for the mountains had to be deferred several days. Such “softness” is the inevitable result of the time-honored polar explorer custom of spend- ing the winter in camp whether in study (where the officers teach the men), theatricals, and the publishing of busy-work newspapers known as Boreal Bugle or North Polar News, as was done by the British expeditions from Parry to Nares; or whether in reading, listening to phonographs and writing reams of home letters for next summer’s mail, as has been the custom on recent expeditions. Sueh idleness makes muscles flabby and (what is worse) breeds discontent personal animosities and bickerings of all sorts. That is one reason THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 17 why I seldom spend more than a few days in any winter camp. An- other reason is that there is always plenty of work to be done. The following morning Captain Bernard and [ started west along the coast and arrived that evening at Captain Martin And- reasen’s, near the International Boundary, a distance of over forty- five miles. This is much more than an ordinary day’s travel when one is carrying even moderately loaded sledges, but I had learned from O’Neill that our preparations at Martin Point were about a month behind schedule, so there was every reason for hurry. Captain Andreasen told me that on their way east O’Neill’s | party had stopped there and told him of the disobedience of my orders at Collinson Point and had informed him that the Govern- }ment would undoubtedly, when they got the reports which were ‘| being sent in from Collinson Point, disavow all my actions. In |particular they told him that if he sold me the North Star he {would have to “whistle for his money,” for the Government would jnever pay the draft. He said the idea had struck him pretty hard jat the time but he had thought it over since and decided that he jwould take his chances. For one thing, he believed the draft }would be paid; and for another, he could see that my plans of ex- ‘\ploration would be seriously handicapped if I could not get the |\North Star and he said he was enough interested in the project to \be willing to take some risk to see the work successful. | At Andreasen’s I received a letter from Captain Cottle, sent \jto meet me to warn me of conditions. He said that members of my party had come to the Belvedere, had explained to him that the )|Government would not make good any arrangements I might make ‘\with him, and had endeavored to dissuade any of his men from elping us in any way. He said that he had, however, paid no ‘fttention to this and had assured his men that should I want ‘jheir services I should be able to pay for them, and that he would ‘himself pay them any bills which I might be unable to pay. Cap- ‘jain Cottle had also had an interview with “Duffy” O’Connor. 7)’Connor had been talking with members of the expedition and had _jlecided to go back on his bargain to sell me his supplies, the reason being that he now feared non-payment of the draft that I was joing to give him in return for the outfit. Cottle said he had |ssured O’Connor that the draft would be paid and urged him jo stick to his bargain, saying that I was the commander of the \xpedition and that the Government would undoubtedly stand by _ \rhatever I did. This letter prepared me for my interview with O’Connor the 118 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC next day. It seemed he had had several changes of mind. First, he had agreed in good faith to sell me the supplies; second, he had decided not to sell them when he heard from members of my expedition that I had no authority to buy them; third, he had de- cided he would sell them after all when he had talked with Captain Cottle; and, fourth, he had finally decided that perhaps he had better not sell them, for after all it was about an even bet whether he would get drafts issued by me paid or not. After some talk, how- | ever, and after his raising the price slightly to compensate him for | the risk he now thought he was taking, I eventually closed the bar- | gain. | That same evening at the Belvedere I got more details of how | everything was going. Captain Cottle had sent three or four of | his men to help Storkerson with the work at Martin Point and had | supplied him with everything he could spare. His influence had | been especially useful in keeping our credit good with the Eskimos, jf who might otherwise have been afraid to work for Storkerson, think- ing they would not get paid. When I got to the Polar Bear I found that feeling ran pretty | high. After telling me what they thought of the conduct of my | people at Collinson Point, severat of the party volunteered to do } anything for me they could in helping on shore with the prepara- } tions. Four of them also volunteered to go with me out over the|} ice if I should be unable to get enough satisfactory men from my } own party. To make this definite, Mott handed me a letter saying }j. that himself, Heard, Mixter and Silsbee would go with me wherever }. IT would take them and that all supplies or resources of theirs were j at my disposal. At Crawford’s I met Storkerson. He confirmed everything told} me by O’Neill and everything I had learned since, adding a good}. deal thereto. Several dog teams had been standing idle in our], barn at Collinson Point. He had asked for some of these to use | | so. No preparations had been made at Collinson Point and nothing had been done looking towards any possible ice journey we might} make except that Mr. Chipman was rating some watches I had | purchased from Captain Andreasen and sent to him for that pur- pose, and Mr. Johansen had overhauled the sounding machine, }' to hand over to Storkerson any of the supplies I had asked for, hy but had given him some socks, mittens, ete., for his cwn use] - THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 119 telling him distinctly that he was not doing that in obedience to any instructions from me but that these garments were presents from him to Storkerson. Storkerson could not say too much of | the help given him by Captain Cottle, Mr. Mott and, in fact, every one on the ships Belvedere and Polar Bear. But neither of these ships had dogs and one of Storkerson’s great difficulties had been inability to hire dogs and sledges for freighting supplies from the Belvedere (about twenty-five miles away). He and the men he had been able to hire from the Belvedere and some Eskimos who were working for him had been compelled to harness themselves to the sledges, taking the place of dogs in hauling them. The very fact that they had to do this while several teams of the expedition’s | dogs stood fat and idle in the barns at Collinson Point, had done a great deal with the Eskimos to undermine my credit, for it |seemed obvious to them from these circumstances that I was no | longer in any control of the equipment or supplies of the expedition. | From this they deduced that I should probably not be able to pay | them if they worked for me, for, of course, Eskimos usually expect to be paid in goods. | With the friendship and help of the whalers on the Belvedere jand the party of sportsmen on the Polar Bear I might almost have jignored the Collinson Point difficulty and saved the precious time it took to go there (for the season was getting late) and started off on the ice directly. But I could not do this for two reasons: First, we needed the rifles, ammunition, light tents, scientific equip- “|ment, cameras, etc., which were in our stores and could not be se- ‘jeured from whalers. Further, for any journey out over the ice I ‘jshould need the codperation of the various ships the following ‘jsummer, and I could not leave shore before making definite ar- “jrangements for the movements of the three vessels, and especially “|those of the North Star, for she was the one I had bought for the “\purpose of codperating in my explorations of the Beaufort Sea. “iff I left shore while my authority was being openly defied I could “rely on no codperation from the ships in future—any written orders “I might send would presumably be treated like the ones already jdisobeyed. Especially I must arrange for the North Star to follow 'jme to Banks Island, for that had become an integral part of my plans. | On the way from Martin Point to Collinson Point Captain Bernard and I spent the night with Crawford in his cabin at the mouth of the Ulahula River. I found then that while both he ' pnd Captain Bernard had at one time been dubious as to which 120 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC side of the controversy they were to take, they were so no longer. They assured me that Charles Thomsen and Charlie Brooks (the steward on the Alaska) would be with me, and they believed Wil- kins would also. It was known that McConnell, who was just then absent on a trip to Point Barrow, would be on my side when he re- turned. In fact, they felt that as soon as the men really thought things out and came face to face with definite action, they would. probably all decide to obey orders. We arrived at Collinson Point just about dinner time. I told the men at once that we would postpone all discussion until eight o’clock, when the evening work was done and everybody could be present. When the time for discussion came, I asked Dr. Anderson | whether he was taking the position which Louis Olesen had men- — tioned to me at Herschel Island: that there were two expeditions, ° he in command of one still in existence and I in command of the other, now defunct; or whether he was taking the position outlined | by O’Neill that he and several of the other men were merely pas- } sengers with the expedition and had authority from Ottawa to } disobey orders whenever they liked? | It was Johansen who answered, saying that they considered Dr. Anderson to be in command of that part of the expedition } which was left, that I had had authority only over the Karluk, } and had none in the expedition at present and had better go home jj: to Ottawa to report the failure of my side of the enterprise. With- out replying to him, I persisted in my inquiries of Dr. Anderson. | Dr. Anderson eventually answered that my position was anal- 4) ogous to that of certain kings of England who had been undis- }; putedly kings as long as their conduct was worthy of a king and as J) long as the people had confidence in them. But when the kings J) of England had become either insane or criminal they had been |}! deposed and in some cases executed. While he disclaimed any Jy intention of an execution, he thought that I had already shown ‘]: by what I had done and by the plans which I had announced, }} especially the much-talked-of “ice trip,’ that I was either not Jy quite sane or was outlining plans which I had no intention or 4: prospect of carrying out to any useful conclusion, but which would, J» nevertheless, use up a good deal of the resources of the expedition. |] He considered himself responsible to the Government for the car- I. rying out of certain plans of theirs and his, and he considered that he would be unable to carry them out if he acquiesced im |} mine. My motive in making the journey over the ice, he felt Jy THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 121 sure, was merely a desire for notoriety. It was well known that no useful purpose could be served by it, the theory on which it was based had the support of no well-known arctic explorer or any one on the expedition, and of no whaler or Eskimo, in so far | as the soundness or tenability of the basic hypothesis was con- cerned. If I were not prevented I would doubtless go out on the ice with several sledges; we would have as many hardships and adventures as possible within a safe distance from land, would stop | when we had had enough and come back, reporting that we had made a brave attempt but that the difficulties were insuperable. To all of which farce he and the rest had made up their minds they would not be parties. They were going to report everything in full to Ottawa and felt sure that the Government would sustain | them. | When Anderson’s statement had been made, I asked him whether {they intended to withhold by force supplies which my compan- jions and I needed for making the proposed trip: to which he re- \plied that there would be no companions, for no one would go }with me. Hereupon I made a sort of roll-call of the men to find out from ‘jeach one whether he would obey my orders and go with me out ion the ice if necessary. I began with Captain Bernard, for I “\knew he would say he would go. Obviously his prompt agreement jsurprised the others. I fear that some of the men had in a meas- jure deceived Dr. Anderson, misleading him into thinking he would jnave the whole-hearted support of everybody. Besides expressing enthusiastic support of my project, Captain Bernard informed the ; sathering that Crawford, too, would take part in the ice trip, if ( esired. The break in the ranks having been made, the others ‘followed. Wilkins said he would go; Captain Nahmens of the ilaska expressed willingness to do anything I might direct; Thom- en, who was not present, had sent word by Captain Bernard that ne would volunteer; Johansen said he would go “if I would make him certain pledges.” When I asked what those were, they turned hut to be merely that he was to be allowed to do scientific work. “As Johansen could never conceivably have been taken on such a | \tip except for the purpose of doing the sort of work which he it jranted me to promise he should be allowed to do, it was a simple 3 aatter to make him that promise. Chipman considered he could not go even for the “support jarty,” for it would make him too late for his topographical work In shore. In this I agreed. Had we been able to start two, three 122 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC or more weeks earlier, as I had planned, he could have gone out with us for two weeks and still have been back ashore before the time he wanted to start his survey work (March 20). The same considerations applied to Cox. They should have been commenc- ing about now their coast survey so as to have the work done ~ between Collinson Point and the Mackenzie delta before the thaws began. I had, in fact, brought with me from the Mackenzie delta . (I forgot to mention above) Peder Pedersen with his dog team to | pilot the topographers east. Pedersen had been about the Macken- zie delta for about twenty years and was an excellent guide. At this point Dr. Anderson agreed that they would all cease opposing my project if I would sign a statement, making certain promises and giving certain guarantees. When I asked what they would be, he said I must promise to let all the scientific men go on doing scientific work,—not to hinder the various members of the party in doing geological, topographical, zoological or other research. In general the demands were merely that the plans which I had always wanted to carry out should be carried out. The evident purpose of the demands was to make it appear that I | had been compelled to allow them to do these things, whereas. | it had in fact been my desire all the time that they should do them. To sign the proposed document was a willing move, for, luckily, I had sent out from Point Barrow in October, or announced before | the expedition ever started, that we intended to do all the things | which they now asked me to promise I would not prevent them 4) from doing. It was a rather tense two hours, but before eleven o’clock a | modus vivendi had been agreed on. By eight o’clock the next | morning every one was at work doing the things which he should | have begun doing not the morning after I came home but a month | earlier, on the morning after receiving my instructions from Stork- | erson. a, Things done in a hurry are seldom done quite as well as when Jj. full time is allowed. Still, it is impossible to say too much for the ],. energy and good will with which some worked with sewing ma-_ chines, others with needles, others with carpenter tools, and still J), others classifying and packing up supplies, no one now sparing }.. any effort to get the preparations through as quickly as possible. |}. CHAPTER XIII SHALL WE DARE TO MARCH NORTH? | HE threatened mutiny had blown over and nothing was wholly lost save a month of priceless time. For, although autumn and mid-winter may well enough be passed in mere prepara- | tions, the precious months following January are the time for real ‘}work, and one of them was gone. There had also arisen, besides |these differences between some of the men and me, bickerings among themselves that died down slowly. Old friendships were broken and /wounds made that to this day remain unhealed. | The causes of the difficulty were partly genuine differences of opinion and partly personal jealousies. The variance in opinion we |have explained, the jealousies are gradually being forgotten and have ino place in this book. | When it had been decided that no active opposition would be made to my trip north over the ice, there came the question of \whom I could get to go with me on the advance section of the trip. Of those who had volunteered the previous evening to follow orders “\(which really included all the men who could reasonably have been fonsidered as material for the work), the majority were either physi- pally ill-adapted for so protracted and serious an adventure, or else so badly needed ashore in connection with the operation of one of the \ships or with helping in scientific work that they were not. eligible. For an undertaking so serious as most people considered ours ‘ito be, no man is suitable unless he volunteers freely and has a degree of faith in the practicability of what is being attempted. Accordingly, as a preliminary to asking for volunteers, I went over the whole situation discussing every argument for and against. This was in conversations with individuals, now trying to get them 10 change their minds, now to stick to previous decisions. But ‘or simplicity’s sake I shall present the case here as I had presented 't earlier in the year when first I attempted to get the men of the Alaska and Sachs interested in our geographic program. | It was our greatest loss when the Karluk drifted off, that we ‘ost with her several ambitious men whose romantic dispositions 123 | | | | | ] 124 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC had made it their dream to undertake some forlorn hope—if it were anything unusually dangerous and difficult (so long as there was a fighting chance) then so much the better. The first thing that had to be stated was the scope of the ex- ploratory journey for which I wanted the men to volunteer. Briefly, the plan was to start north from Martin Point the first week in March (later experience showed that the first week in February would have been better). We would travel north roughly along the 148rd meridian to 76° N. Latitude, if we could. If during this journey the ice over which we traveled was drifting west or northwest rapidly (4 miles per day or over), we would return from our “farthest north” to Alaska by a route which (partly because of the assumed drift and partly to cover new ground) would be west of our outbound course. We would land presumably some- where between Cape Halkett and Point Barrow. Then, perhaps in May or June, we would follow the coast east and join our ships. But it was always possible we might find land on this journey. If it were small, we would map the coastline roughly and return to Alaska to join our ships in the late spring; if it were large, we would spend a year upon it. If such large land were fertile and *| had driftwood, we would live on the caribou or musk oxen found there and burn wood for fuel during the winter; but if it lacked driftwood and was for any reason devoid of land game, we would live on seals on the coast, eating them for food and burning their blubber for fuel. The following spring we would travel, according to convenience, back to Alaska or east over the sea ice to Banks |} or Prince Patrick Island, where the North Star was to be either near Cape Alfred or Land’s End, and the Sachs between Cape Alfred and Cape Kellett. But if no current carried us west and if no land were found, we would, after getting as far north as possible, turn east when the approach of summer made sledge travel difficult, and land on Prince Patrick Island or near Cape Alfred (near Norway Island) on Banks { Island. On the whole trip, whatever its duration or destination, we would live exclusively by hunting after the first five or six weeks | which would use up any supplies we might bring from home. The trip would last twelve weeks at the shortest and a year or two years at the longest. 4 This journey, all but the first fifty miles of a total distance of ] five to seven hundred miles, would be over an ocean area hitherto | unexplored because the massing in it of ice even in summer had THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 125 made it in the past impenetrable alike to exploring and whaling ships. But to our point of destination (if no land were found and if we did not drift west) there did exist a roundabout passage already charted and sailed by at least two ships—McClure in the Investigator in 1851 and Captain George Leavitt in the Narwhal in 1806. McClure proceeded along the coast of Banks Island to Mercy Bay. Leavitt returned by nearly a “great circle course’ to Herschel Island. Captain Leavitt has told me that the Nar- whal was the only ship of the whaling fleet that ever went to Norway Island, but I have heard of others which went within 45 miles of it—to Terror Island. The North Star, when the summer came, was to follow this | well-known route, first east along the mainland to Cape Bathurst | or near it, then north to Cape Kellett. It was especially here i ‘| expected the Star’s light draft to be valuable—she would worm her | way up the coast through the shallow shore lead between the land '| and any heavy ice that might be grounded offshore. On reaching | Norway Island (N. Lat. 7334° approx.), she was to look for a | beacon containing a message from us. If she found none she was | to proceed to Prince Patrick Island if she could; otherwise, she was to winter at the most northerly convenient point on Banks Island. If we were in the east somewhere we would find her sometime dur- }} ing the winter or spring 1914-15. If we did not, she was to do | whatever exploring she could the spring of 1915. During the sum- “}mer 1915 she would return south if she had not found us. As more fully explained later, the Sachs was also to come to |Banks Island, though she was not to try to come as far north jalong the coast as the Star. For a journey that might develop along any of the three plans outlined above (according to the natural conditions we found in the ‘junexplored area), I wanted at least four volunteers—preferably ‘|more so that I might try them out while the support party were still with us, taking with me eventually those who turned out to “pnjoy the work most—which is another way of saying the best men. In polar work, physique is of some significance but tem- jperament is far more important. In order to get my four or more volunteers I had to justify the hypothesis upon which the plan of the journey was based. Part of the ground did not have to be gone over in stating the case, for up to a point our methods would be essentially those of the iskimos or of Peary. We would use Eskimo dogs, Nome sledges (the two we had), snowhouses for camps when the weather was 7 126 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC cold and Burberry tents when it was warmer. At the start we would cook food brought from Nome with primus kerosene stoves, in the manner of Nansen or Scott. So far there was no difficulty, no reluctance among the men. But here strange issues arose. Other explorers had planned to turn back before the food and fuel brought along had been ex- hausted; we planned to go ahead without either, relying on the sea ice or on undiscovered and uninhabited lands to supply both indefinitely. This was where our plans branched off from those of previous explorers and where our men were dubious—or more than that. It was the striking out along a new path that I had to try to justify before I could expect any one to volunteer for the undertaking. I think any lawyer or other person used to pleading a cause will agree that the first principle of good argumentation is to con- cede in the beginning every point which the opposition are even- tually going to make you concede. Accordingly, I admitted freely at the start that my plan of traveling away from land an indefinite distance over moving sea ice, relying for food and fuel on animals to be secured by hunting, was considered unsound by, so far as I knew, every polar explorer and evéry critical authority on polar ft exploration. We were going to traverse the Beaufort Sea west of — Banks and Prince Patrick Islands. This is the very region referred to specifically by Sir Clements Markham in his “Life of Admiral |" McClintock” as “the polar ocean without life’ when he is con- 4: “rasting the comparatively fertile regions around Melville Island where musk oxen and caribou can be killed on shore and where 4 there are resources of a sort, with the region west of Prince Patrick " Island which, according to him, is devoid of all things that may sustain human life.* Markham could not be dismissed as an “armchair explorer,” for he had been a member of one of the 4® successful British polar expeditions at the time of the Franklin |" search and had later, in his position of President of the Royal | Geographical Society and leading authority on polar matters, been 4 in personal contact with every arctic explorer of note from the }*! middle of the Nineteenth Century, up to and including Nansen }% and Peary. And, indeed, the testimony of Nansen and Peary was neither — * Markham says about Prince Patrick Island: “It forms the boundary — " between the arctic paradise of Melville Island and the polar ocean (west of it) without life.” Op. cit., p. 172, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 127 equivocal nor friendly to my hypothesis. Nansen and Johansen made their remarkable journey first north from the Fram and then towards the Franz Josef Island group without any plan of sustaining themselves on the road by the products of hunting. | They carried rifles and ammunition and made good use of these \when they got into the shore waters of the Franz Josef group, ) but did not rely on them at all, while on the high seas. | One need not go to any declaration on this point made by {Nansen for his actions speak louder than words. The two of them |started from the Fram driving three sledges, each with a large |team of dogs. Any one used to dog driving would instantly object, \that it is not practical for two men to drive three sledges, but /Nansen’s answer is that they needed all the dogs they could take, for they intended to use them as food, first for each other and, in an extremity, for themselves. He looked upon dogs as portable, or rather self-carrying, provisions. He tells us that as they struggled northward he gradually be- 2ame fonder and fonder of the more faithful of his dogs. Some of them worked more consistently and single-mindedly for his ‘suecess every day than he did himself. This is the common ex- ‘perience of all men of feeling who have used dogs in polar work. _\t is common experience also in more southern lands that we be- jome fond of even the toy dogs that are useless and incapable of lomg us any service. How much more affection then would one n Nansen’s position have for the dogs that labored for him more aithfully day by day than any but the rarest men would have ‘jad the moral strength to do, growing hungrier, thinner and weaker ‘ith each strenuous march but never sparing their strength, never ‘\himpering, always eager to please and to do their best. But day by day the food became less in the sledges and the ‘me drew nearer when some of these faithful friends had to be ‘hacrificed on the altar of science and geographic discovery. At rst he could kill the lazier ones without quite so much compunc- “jon, and this made easier because more gradual the approach to ie final horror of killing the ones he most dearly loved. Our qgagination makes it easy for us to fill in the gaps, and there te few, in Nansen’s descriptions of his own mental sufferings as > killed these friends of his and cut their exhausted bodies into eces of food. We all agree that his feeling does him credit, jthough some wonder how any goal can be worth the deliberate “janning of things like these. For this had been the plan not : 128 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC only before he left the ship on the particular journey, but even — before he left Norway. He calls these the “stern necessities of polar travel.” j from which to consider Nansen’s plan and procedure. But from — sympathetic attitude toward dogs which Nansen describes himself — From the point of view of the moralist, there are many angles our present point of view the lesson is clear. No man with the © as having would have killed them for food had there been any other ~ food available. No matter how sympathetic a man may be if towards all creation, he would surely rather kill a seal that is a perfect stranger than a dog he has brought up from puppyhood ~ | and that has been faithfully serving him for months. So it is j clear that there were no seals for dog-feed that Nansen might have secured with his English rifle which he tells us was so good and had cost so much. In reading his book we all accept as neces- |; sary though deplorable the killing of dog to feed dog until the last |, survivor was killed for the explorers themselves (presumably) to j}, eat. For it is a commonplace of our knowledge that, as Markham | puts it, the polar ocean is “without life.” | It may be said about Nansen that he did not have the advan- ; ; tage of understanding Eskimo methods of seal STREN and possibly . the testimony of Peary to the conteane is Sic Peary was a great admirer of Eskimo methods of travel a at all, for he relied on his Eskimo Se to Apple him with ireall n | h meat for his crew and food of some sort, usually walrus, for his dogs. On all of his later journeys he had Eskimos with him to build the snowhouses, drive the dogs and to do practically all the ; menial work. He had spent nine winters in the North when he. wrote his book, “The North Pole,” describing his last and success- ful journey. In summing up his “fundamental principles” of suc jp. cessful traveling over the north polar pack, he says that when you 4. start on a journey you must have in your sledges enough food to }), to land. He says that you must similarly have enough fuel te take you where you are going and back again to shore. He was }}),. fully aware of the fact that the ocean waters near land are com J, monly well supplied with game and that both in them and on the | q land you may expect to secure meat to eke out your stock 0 | provisions. He always made use of this principle on his journeys THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 129 ‘going so far to seaward that in one or two notable cases he had just barely enough food to reach land and had to get his first meals on shore from musk oxen or caribou. Peary also says that it is essential to success that your plans shall command the confi- ‘dence of enough Eskimos to help you to carry them out. There is then no denying that Peary’s testimony is against such jventures as I was planning. We were going north from Alaska into \the Beaufort Sea which has been uniformly described by the British jexplorers and by the American, Leffingwell, and the Dane, Mikkel- jsen—which means all the explorers who have been there—as the \region of the heaviest polar ice known. This is presumably the least promising part of the whole polar regions for the method jof living by forage; this is the section specifically described by (Markham as “the polar ocean without life.” Seals might be found in shallow waters in certain parts of the polar basin even at some distance from land but they certainly would not be found jn abysmal depths. Leffingwell and Mikkelsen’s soundings, taken jm their journey north of 72° N. latitude in 1907, had given the presumption that the ocean north of Alaska would be deep, thus jupplying with one more argument those who believed food could ‘jot be secured. | To make the case against me all the stronger, there were the iskimos. As mentioned above, Peary thinks that it is one of the jssentials of a successful journey over the moving pack that you all have Eskimos with you. And no Eskimo in northern Alaska yas willing to go with us. Many of them were good friends of jaine and some had worked for me on other expeditions. Nat- Jusiak, for instance, had been with me for four years and was “\nxious to enter our service again. But he specified that he would jot under any conditions go out on the moving ice. And so said | |] his compatriots. They considered being out on the sea ice dan- brous enough through the accidents that are possible when, under lress of wind or current, the ice floes crush each other, rising on lge and going through miner antics that are adonitvedly: threaten- ig in spite of their ponderous slowness. But the main obstacle as the fear of starvation. Most of them said they would not go ith us at all, and the most venturesome said that they would not ( Wnsider going any farther than until half the food carried in the dges had been eaten. They wanted to have the other half to ling them back ashore again, or to bring them at least into the imiliar shore waters where there were seals. | I used to tell them that both they and we knew how to get 130 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC seals and that we would find no trouble in securing enough meat — for food and blubber for both food and fuel, and that it would be much easier to travel light, relying on killing bears, than to haul sledges loaded heavily with provisions. But their answer was that — there would be no seals or bears to kill. I tried to argue that they — had no means of knowing there would be none, for neither they nor their ancestors had, so far as we knew, hea in the habit of | going more than five or at the most ten miles from land. Their — reply was that their ancestors never went farther because they | knew there was no food to be secured on the deep sea, and that | their ancestors’ wisdom was good enough for them. I tried to bribe ~ them by promising more pay for a day at sea than they were getting — for a week’s work ashore, and got in answer the question: “What | is the use of big pay if you die?” i I could get no more support for my plans from the Eskimos — | than I could from geographers and explorers. t Neither were the whalers more favorable. Many of them had | been in these waters for twenty years and they were all of the | same opinion as the Eskimos. The reason for this was that they i had borrowed their opinions from the Eskimos. It appeared to — them that ideas which they had borrowed twenty years ago and | had held ever since without investigation had somehow received — conclusive confirmation through the mere lapse of time. They told me that it “stood to reason” and was “well known” that the polar ocean in winter far from land was a barren and desley waste without any resources. They were far more pessimistic than any ordinary explorer, for among us as a class it is conceded that men can travel with dogs and sledges over the ice. But the whalers | commonly said that such journeys as Peary’s could not be made in i the waters north of Alaska. Not only would the difficulties of {I travel be so much greater that, even granting safety, progress |) would be much slower, but also the ice was so mobile that you 4; would be in continual danger north of Alaska when you might be |): in comparative safety on the heavy and sluggish ice north e 4p Greenland. 1. The reply to their argument had to be based on the iourneaadh t of Baron Wrangel north of eastern Siberia and Leffingwell and || Mikkelsen north of Alaska. Judging from their narratives and }}y from Peary’s, it is indeed much more difficult to make a good th mileage near Alaska or Siberia than north of Greenland, mainly because of the strenuous currents that multiply by ten or by 4 }) hundred in the vicinity of Alaska and northeast Asia the leads }\ si i | | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 131 which have to be crossed and which are in every icy ocean the - most serious handicap that the explorer has to meet. These same strong currents break up the ice into more pressure-ridges, making sledge travel more difficult and the breakage of sleds more likely. Also when, by the opening of leads all around, you are com- | pelled to cease traveling, the currents carry you with greater speed | —usually in a direction that does not suit you—than the sluggish | waters north of Greenland. But allowing all that, Wrangel and Leffingwell and Mikkelsen had at least shown that sledge travel | was practicable. It was also reasonable to assume that the diffi- culties would be greatest near land, and would lessen when you got )farther out to sea than even they had been. The whalers were all personally friendly and willing to help me when they could. They agreed that it was “my funeral,” and ‘}were anxious to see that nothing prevented our making the trial; ‘but they were equally eager in their advice that upon the first clear evidence of the absence of game at sea we should (if we ever \got started) turn back towards shore and safety. They pointed jout that it is not cowardice but discretion which yields gracefully ‘to the inevitable. Captain Cottle and some of the other whaling loficers, such as Mr. William Seymour, were willing to go so far as jto urge eligible young men in the crews to take their chances with s. This was because they were good friends and good sports and not because of any real confidence in our program, although \. think I came nearer convincing Captain Cottle than I did almost iny of the members of our own expedition. | But I had to admit that with the exception of such men as Japtain Bernard, who with blind loyalty would go anywhere, Wil- ‘ans who was ready for any adventure, and my friends at the ‘Polar Bear who were sportsmen in the best sense of the word nd looked upon our venture as one of the sort which might work ut and ought not to be allowed to fail for want of men to try > out—apart from these, I had to admit that I had secured no upport and that geographers, explorers, whalers and Eskimos like were of the opinion that our plans were unsound and that 1e attempt to carry them out would be disastrous. This was the case of the opposition stated, as it seems to me, ith fairness, allowing weight to every real argument. It looked ke a strong case. In rebuttal I appealed to the science of oceanography which, [though not so old as some, is as well established as most of the ological sciences. Thousands of observations taken by careful = 132 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC men had established the principle clearly laid down, for instance, by Sir John Murray in “The Ocean” and in his larger work, “The — Depths of the Ocean,” that the amount of animal life per cubic ~ unit of ocean water is least in the tropics and increases gradually as you proceed towards either pole.* This is really a fact of com- — mon observation, although the ordinary observer neglects to make the proper deduction. The great commercial fisheries of the world are not in the © tropics. We get the name sardine but not all the sardines from — Sardinia. The well known fisheries are in the north Atlantic, on — the Newfoundland banks, in the North Sea and on the coasts of © Norway and Iceland. That is where the cod, the herring, the — haddock, and the halibut come from. When the ornithologist — explains to you why there is guano on a certain part of the coast | of Chile, he tells you that the cold waters from the Antarctic bring — in the tremendous quantities of marine animals upon which the — birds live that deposit the guano. At the marine-biological station — at Wood’s Hole, Massachusetts, you learn that the polar current — sets in to that coast more at certain seasons than at others and that marine life is most abundant when it does. Millions a sca pr organism dies in cold water its body floats around for a mcidll erable time ready to be devoured by other organisms.** This in — simple terms is the explanation of why more animal life can sub- sist in cold than in warm ocean water—there is more to eat. i? But here the critic can object that the oceanographers them-_ selves, such as Sir John Murray or Nansen, while pointing out. the tremendous abundance of animal life a the one of a ; *The Ocean,” by Sir John Murray, Home University Library, New York ]. . and London, pp. 162-164. ; ** See “Fishes of the High Seas,” by J. T. Nichols, in The National Mie rine, July, 1920, pp. 26-34, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 133 and he tells us that he found crustacea and in general all small animal life rare when you get far within the ice.* Without mini- | mizing the great wealth of knowledge brought back to us by the | Fram at the end of her first voyage, I would provisionally in my | reasoning assume that Nansen’s failure to find animal life in great | abundance was due not to its actual absence so much as to its presence having escaped his observation. | That animal life in the ocean is extraordinarily abundant on \the edges of the ice-covered area I have said is well known. It is | equally well known that there are great currents that sweep into |the Arctic and under the ice to take the place of the water that | flows south in the form of cold currents. It is asserted that fish jdo not take kindly to the ice covering over the sea at high lati- jitudes. The polar ocean is generally several miles in depth, and |what difference should it make to a fish though there be numerous ‘\pieces of ice floating on top? When the presence of ice on such jlakes as Winnipeg, Bear or Baikal does not appear to interfere with jthe happiness of the fish that live in them, then why should we jassume that it does in the ocean? You can scarcely think of scum or dust so thin on top of a basin of water as not to be |\proportionately thicker than five or ten or even fifteen feet of ea ice on top of fifteen thousand feet of ocean water. | But even if all the fishes were to turn tail and swim south when |they came to the edge of the ice, there would still remain the tre- jmendous quantity of plankton or floating life which without voli- sion of its own is carried north under the ice with every movement of the upper two or three hundred fathoms of the sea surface (any life deeper than that would be unreachable by seals). Nan- ‘sen’s own theory of drifting across the polar basin, which was so {riumphantly vindicated by the Fram, postulates that any object jound at one edge of the icy area this year will have drifted Jucross and will be found at the other edge two or three or five rears from now. If the given object drifts across, evidently the vater in which it floats has also been drifting across and in that vater at the beginning of the voyage were living myriads of float- og plants and animals. 1) Why is it logical to assume that these will all have died and isappeared before a particular cubic unit of water in question jets into even the center of the inaccessible area? Even were it 0 die and disappear when the center of the inaccessible area is *See article by F. Nansen in Eleventh Edition of the Encyclopedia ritannica; title “Polar Regions.” 134 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC reached, it would have by then lasted long enough to serve all © our purposes. We were going to start from that edge of the ice © from which the drift is assumed by Nansen and others to be north- westward or northerly; we should assuredly have with us as fellow — travelers all these docile animals that allow the currents to carry | them where they please. It was thus I reasoned that the animals upon which seals live will be found everywhere under the ice of the polar sea. And — if the feed is there, the seals will follow the feed. We can travel along with confidence, killing seals as we need them, using the lean | and part of the fat for food and the rest of the fat for fuel. For |! a seal that weighs two hundred pounds will give something like || eighty pounds of meat and bones, twenty or thirty pounds of waste |! and nearly a hundred pounds of blubber. When you have killed |! enough seals to furnish you with the lean meat needed for men and _ |! dogs and when the men and dogs have eaten all the seal’s fat they — care for, there will be left over blubber for fuel to be used extrava- |! gantly, with still a remainder to be thrown away. : | Does it seem that even if the seals were there we might not t be able to get them? I am glad to say that none of the members | of our expedition raised that point very seriously. Both Storkerson |" and I had lived for many years with Eskimos. They remembered |* that we knew every trick there is of detecting and securing seals |" and, further, that these tricks are easily acquired. It is true, al- |" though puzzling, that it is possible to live in close contact with }" people who are doing certain things and still to keep the mental i a aE ee attitude that we ourselves undoubtedly could never learn to do | them. The feeling is familiar not only to men who hire Indian }" guides to take them miraculously through the wilderness, but to | those who own cars or hire taxis and yet feel that their driving }® and repair are things in which they could never become adept. | But none of our men supposed Storkerson or me to belong, so fa Ja . as seal hunting went, to the class of those who own cars and can- |" not drive them. ek At this point it was common for my auditors to say something }) to the effect that, while this reasoning sounded all right in a wa E | room, they did not think they cared to risk their lives upon it, ft Rather than an argument ever so sound, they preferred the evidence }/* of eye witnesses, such as Nansen and Peary, who had been there }® and come back with testimony of the absence of seals. It was | unreasonable to assume that all polar travelers before our time } ‘ { i THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 135 had been fools and incapable of finding this royal road to ex- ploration. To these objections I could reply sincerely that I yielded to no one in my admiration for Peary and that he had been my friend and adviser for many years. But according to plans which he considered (and found) adequate to the task of reaching the Pole, |Peary had started from Grant Land with food enough to take him to his destination and back again; there was no reason why he }should stop to hunt for seals. Furthermore, Peary himself does jnot ever appear to have hunted seals by the Eskimo method and jprobably was not familiar with the technique of it and especially jwith the unobtrusive signs by which the expert hunter can detect jthe presence of seals. The reply to me was that Peary had Eskimos {with him who were presumably expert seal hunters; to which it jcould be countered that, while Peary could speak to his Eskimos in the jargon which he used for intercourse with them and while \they would always understand him and be able to reply in the same jargon, he never tried to learn their language, or, as he calls it, |their “secret language.” * . At the end of a day’s travel the Eskimos jmight very well have discussed with each other in the vernacular or “secret language” the seal signs they had noticed during the jay and Peary would not have known what they were talking vbout. For it would not have occurred to him to ask, having con- ‘luded a priori that there were no seals; and it would not have pecurred to them to speak, for they would not have supposed him }o be interested. Peary’s Eskimos, too, were usually in a hurry to ‘et back home, and if they had supposed him interested and had jold him about the presence of seals it might have delayed the journey and kept them away longer than they liked. Possibly the ‘jonditions out at sea were so different from those they were used to jround Smith Sound that they themselves may have failed to notice jhe seal signs. On this point I cannot speak, for I have never vis- ‘ted Smith Sound, and no one who has has had enough command if the technique of seal hunting to write instructively about it. At py rate, no such observations have been published. It is possible for a business man to buy a passage from New ork to Liverpool and to cross the Newfoundland banks without ver seeing a codfish or any evidence to lead him to think that jdfish are there. But a fisherman on the banks would have no ubt of the presence of codfish nor any trouble in getting them. *See “The North Pole,” by Robert E. Peary, p. 50. | | 136 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC It seemed to me that in an analogous way even keen observers like © Nansen and Peary, preoccupied with the carrying-out of plans — having nothing to do with seals, might have traveled for months — over an ocean full of them without ever suspecting their presence. — But our plans did have to do with seals very definitely. By — the theory that governed them seals were there. We would there- — fore look for them, and if they were there we should know how ~ to get them. The conclusion to me had an appearance of soundness. © If it were to work out, we would have solved the problem of com- — missariat, hitherto the crucial difficulty in polar exploration. 4 But at the end of the most elaborate and logical argument the ~ ordinary “hard-headed” listener would still demur on the changeless © ground that all eye witnesses were on the other side. If the thing © contended for were so, some one would have discovered it long — ago; there must be a flaw in the reasoning somewhere. Most of — the men said they declined to go on any such enterprise, and that — public opinion would sustain them in their refusal. Perhaps they were right about public opinion. Perhaps they | were right in their own decision. Whether we think so or don’t is a matter of temperament. It was on the basis of this reasoning as I have stated it that i some of my local judges came to the conclusion that my plan — of an extended journey where men and dogs would live on seals or die without them amounted to insanity and justified them in~ their general lack of confidence in all my plans, at least in so far_ as they hinged in any way on this central idea. As a matter of fact, most of them did hinge on it. . I pointed out that when those plans had been laid before the National Geographic Society in Washington, the Museum of Nat- | ural History in New York, the Geographic Congress at Rome, and |; Sir Robert Borden and his Cebiney at Ottawa, the proposal to | was exactly this that the Eo undian Government had sent me North e to try out. ie The Karluk had carried a sumptuous outfit of the orthodox by any of the well-known and often-tried maethedel It had in inct '" been my intention to use substantially the Peary methods when },; within 500 or 600 miles of our base, and then to extend the length of the journeys both in mileage and time by continuing ahead and : living by forage instead of turning back when the last of perhaps tt, twenty sleds we had started with were empty. But the Karluk }.. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 137 was gone and we had only two good sledges to start with; the system of relays of many support parties was out of the question. It was now a case of either letting the geographic program go or else trying out the method of “living off the country” while doing | with that program what we could. How thoroughly beyond the scope of our diminished equipment the Peary system of relays or support parties was, can most clearly | be shown by a brief review of Peary’s trip to the North Pole. When Peary started north from Cape Thomas Hubbard he had before him a journey of just over 400 miles and back. Accord- ing to his calculations, he needed for this 1389 dogs, 24 men and 19 sledges. The sledges were loaded mainly with food and fuel \for, on his theory that you have to carry with you everything you are going to use, clothing, camp gear and the like had to be cut to }the minimum. For 24 men he carried only two rifles. On other journeys he had carried only one and had even sawed off half the tbarrel to make it lighter. I believe he carried only one pair of \field glasses for the entire party. No matter what the latitude, jit is always uncomfortable to sleep at night in the clothes you jwear in the daytime, but the saving of weight was so essential \that he permitted the carrying of no bedding and he and the men slept in their clothes. | As they traveled north the sledges rapidly became lighter. The \L89 dogs ate a pound each per day, the 24 men ate two pounds pach, and there was a certain amount of fuel consumed. Before (many days several “standard loads” of 600 pounds each had been sed up, leaving that many empty sledges. Peary would send these pack with the poorest dogs and the men who were for one reason br another least suited to the work, giving them just enough food jor a rapid journey ashore. A few days later a few more sledges lyould be empty and similarly sent back. No man ate an ounce joore than he was entitled to, seldom was an extra ounce of fuel ised to warm even the coldest camp; the men worked to the limit if their strength and the dogs beyond the limit, so that one by Ine they fell behind on the trail and either lay there frozen or vere fed to the other dogs. By this system Peary finally found limself with three sledges loaded with provisions and with three Yr four of the men best adapted to traveling, within striking dis- ance of the Pole. He made it and he got back safely. But he las said to me that had the Pole been a hundred miles farther away probably could not have been reached with this method in a jay to provide for a safe return ashore. | | 138 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC On this point I saw no reason to disagree with Peary. Four ~ or five hundred miles away from the base and back seems to be © about the limit of a journey that can be made with that system. But though the North Pole is only about 400 miles away from the nearest land upon which a base can be established, there are many other points within the polar regions that are much more remote from a base on any known land and these would be unattain- able by the Peary system. It is in this connection that we have pre- ~ pared the map of comparative inaccessibility of various points within the polar regions which is published in this volume.* This consideration of the Peary system, which is admirable — within its scope, shows clearly why we could not possibly have — | carried on by that method. To begin with, to be successful in the } task entrusted to us by the Government we had to make journeys — longer than either the one Peary made, or any he considered the |, system capable of. And then we had not the men nor the sledges, | though we could doubtless have purchased the dogs. It was liter- — ally a choice between the absolute failure of our geographic pro- — ; gram and the testing of the method of “living on the country.” —_ |, As a last plea I used to point out to the men that I had an- ‘ nounced the intention to live by forage on the sea ice not only in | the official statements of the expedition but also in newspaper — interviews, in speeches made to “Canadian Clubs” and other or-— ganizations just before leaving, and, in fact, in every public state- | ment made by me on the point. They had known from the start, an therefore, that I might call on them for just this work. Some of | them replied they had never supposed this was anything but news- |; paper talk. It might perhaps be justifiable to use this argument to. th create public interest and secure funds for an expedition. But a man’s life is the only one he has and he can not be expected to risk it lightly. But I did get volunteers enough for the minimum number of fh. assistants needed. To these loyal men, poets enough in their out- | hs look on life to be willing to take new Tisks that new lands might | a be found, new seas charted and a new idea tried out, I owe grati- |). tude for ‘support at a.critical time. And no less do I owe it to” , Storkerson, Andreasen and Castel whom I was able to engage 4 from outside. Their consistent support when they were with me, — ; their energy and discretion when they had to carry out tasks on | ; their own, enabled us finally to do without the Karluk most of the | iN geographic work that we had been expected to do with her hela * See ante, p. 8. Hh, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 139 No courage nor hard work can replace years of technical train- ing, nor can delicate scientific instruments be improvised with a jackknife. There was no replacing McKinlay, Malloch or Murray in the northern section any more than Beuchat could be replaced 'in the southern. But the lands were discovered, the seas were sounded and the field covered though most of the detailed scientific | work has to remain for the future. The men of the expedition who were willing to go with me as | knew, though he was not now at Collinson Point) and Wilkins. Those who were willing to go on the support party were James \Crawford, Frits Johansen, Otto Nahmens and Charles Thomsen. There were also the four volunteers from the Polar Bear, but it jhad always been understood that their volunteering was to take jeffect only if I proved unable to get men otherwise. That storm {had now blown over. Of those members of the expedition who did not volunteer for |the advance work, many were not expected by me to do so because ‘|they had too important work to do ashore either of a scientific jaature or in connection with managing the ships or camp. Some were also physically disqualified. And I was able to get all the jmen I thought I should want. What I needed from the others was merely the codperative spirit and the help of a few of them as a relay party to go a short distance from shore to help us through \he worst belt of broken ice, perhaps fifty miles. Of the men I have mentioned as willing to go with me on the ‘|ce, all were at Collinson Point or in the vicinity except McConnell. He had been sent shortly after Christmas from Collinson Point ‘jo Cape Halkett, a distance of about 150 miles, to fetch Jenness ‘lown to Barter Island for archeological work to be done in the pring. McConnell should have returned long ago and we were eginning to worry a little about him. While the journey was by ‘}O means an agreeable one to make during the absence of the un, there was little chance for anything to have gone wrong. But wanted McConnell to be of the company and we needed badly ae good dogs he had with him and his sled, a better one for the se of our support party than the one we would have to take in s place. | It was on the Belvedere I got Aarnout Castel. I had first seen “im as a sailor on the Bowhead under Captain John Cook in 1906 ‘nd had before now found reason to consider him an excellent ian. Partly through the good offices of Captain Cottle, but mainly 140 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC because Castel was made of the right stuff, he volunteered for the advance work. ; I set much store by Ole Andreasen, a brother of Captain Matt Andreasen. I did not really know exactly the sort of man Ole was going to be, but he had at least the admirable quality of cheer- fulness under all circumstances and an absolute inability to see how anybody could be lonesome anywhere, no matter how isolated — or remote from various things that ordinary people enjoy. This_ I knew from my experience with him on my second expedition (spring, 1912). I suppose that those who philosophize on such things would say he had “resources within himself” which are lack- - Ing in most of us. 4 Captain Bernard, who was going in our support party, was an excellent dog driver and one of the best traveling companions I have ever had in spite of his fifty- six years. It was largely thanks | to him that our sledges were in as good condition as they were, for among other accomplishments he was an excellent sled maker. — The last man to be mentioned of those I eventually selected for the start out on the ice was Frits Johansen, marine biologist. In a sense he was the most important because, in addition to his other work, he was expected to make whatever oceanographical or biological observations he could. At one time on the support jour- ney he got so interested that, contrary to his feelings when he was on land, he wanted to continue with us to the limit of our journe . But both his own judgment and mine was that the expedition could not afford to have him do this, for he had a great deal of biological paraphernalia ashore which nobody but he understood ; and of which he alone could make full use—as he eventually did, for dition. Star, Sachs anv Alaska av Huerscue. ISLAND. a Tue North Star Hav SunxK. Tus Smoxina Currrs—FRANKLIN Bay. Burning Coalmines? CHAPTER XIV THE ICE JOURNEY BEGINS IN MISFORTUNE AND DIFFICULTY HE third day after I got home everything was ready for the journey to Martin Point and thence out on the ice. But now nature took a hand. One of the worst gales that any of us jhad ever seen blew up from the southwest. Not only was the wind jterrific for two or three days, but the temperature was lower, con- sidering the wind velocity, than I had previously seen it on the jmainland of North America (37° below zero F. with a wind we jestimated at 60 to 80 miles an hour), although I have since seen Pte weather out on the Canadian islands. This wind delayed jis for two or three days, at the end of which our caravan started. \Ve arrived in two days. | On the way to Martin Point we saw to seaward black patches n the sky, the reflection in the clouds of open water not far off- shore. From the information of Eskimos, whalers and our own people alike, we knew that for a month or two previous to this }he ice to an unknown distance from land had been lying quiet ind fairly level. It must have been unbroken for twenty or thirty Iniles out at least, for no water sky had been seen from shore even a the far distance since shortly after Christmas. If we only could jjave started two or three weeks earlier, as had been planned, ‘pr even a week earlier, we could have made rapid progress away jrom land for the first twenty or thirty miles. This is the most ‘\ritical belt, for the obstructions to travel are tupually greater the earer you are to shore. | Now the prospects did not look good, ee the blackness was eflected so high in the clouds that it was clear the open water was ot more than four or five miles from the beach. What we had to jope for was a spell of cold and calm weather, giving young ice a hance to form over the open stretches out of which the wind had jlown the old ice, drifting it to seaward. But that was just the prt of weather we were not having and did not soon get. The early art of the gale had been at a temperature of 37° F. below zero, hich is extraordinary for a wind of over 80 miles an hour, as 141 142 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC this was at its maximum. But as the gale proceeded the tempera- — ture had risen. Now that it was over the weather kept so warm — that, although the season was still winter, the temperature was actually that of spring. At times it came almost up to the freezing point. This was pretty serious, for when the ice has some tendency to movement, as is usual after a gale, it is not likely to be set fast solidly enough for travel by a frost of less than ten or twenty degrees below zero. On Sunday, March 22, 1914, we made the start out on the ice northward from Martin Point. This was about three weeks or a month too late. The sun was getting higher every day and spring was approaching, when on the ice of the polar sea no man can work with safety or comfort. But with the failure of the Karluk behind us it was now or never. Neither the Government at Ottawa nor the men of our own party would have continued their support had we failed to accomplish something that spring of 1914. 4 Besides the men of our own party, we had at Martin Point vis- _ itors from the two whaling ships wintering in the vicinity, Heard, Mott and Silsbee of the Polar Bear; Baur, Hazo and McKin- | non of the Belvedere. These were some of the men without whose assistance and encouragement we could not have been ready to start even then and probably could not have started at all. I remember distinctly the warmth of their farewells and good wishes, but my j recollection of the weather seems less acute, or at least different from _ theirs. Neither my diary nor my memory tells anything of a ter- — rific gale that was raging, yet Mr. Mott in a magazine article gave | this account of our departure: “When Stefansson started the ice © was soft and the weather bad, with a strong wind blowing. It | was so bad that we felt we couldn’t go home that day, although our — camp was only ten miles away. It was an awful day. The wind | was howling and the snow was swirling as they pulled out into the teeth of the blizzard, and before they had gone fifty yards they were » out of sight. We fought our way back to our tents, thankful we weren’t in their places. The next day I wrote in my diary that 1 ]} never wanted to be an explorer, that they earned all the glory and — -all the honor that the world can give them. It is worse than being | in the trenches.” Wl This is the point of view of a man who was present when we | started and who wrote of it later, after going home and serving the . full American part of a war we were never even to hear of for more | than a year. Unfortunately, as I believe, for Mr. Mott, the arclll blizzards which he encountered had always found him in the vicinity — “LNIOG NILUVIT “LY TWdG HALIM SyOOdLNG DNIMOO() WOud GUVMVAG STIVay, aodqlg aH fT, a De ae SSS = ‘aqaig Nawoug V ONTIdIvday THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 143 of his ship or some Eskimo house into which he could retreat, and where in a cozy interior his mind was free to endow the gales out- side with the horrors that those of us fail to notice who fight them daily as an incident of our work. My weather entry for that day is, | “Clear, snow drifting, wind N. E. 30°;” which being translated ; means that although the snow was whirling around us enough to explain the statement that we soon disappeared from sight, there was clear sky to be seen overhead. My diary does go into some detail as to equipment. The first sled was driven by Captain Bernard with seven dogs and a load of 1,020 pounds; Wilkins came next with seven dogs and 789 pounds; then Castel with five dogs and 644 pounds; and Storkerson last with six dogs and 960 pounds. Andreasen and Johansen held them- selves ready to assist any of the teams that might get stuck in a snowdrift or to right any overturned sled. It was my part to go ahead carefully picking a way between the masses of jagged, up- turned ice that make the surface of the northern seas in winter not the level expanse those may imagine who have seen only lake ice, but something between a system of miniature mountain ranges and \the interior of a granite quarry. This first day everything went as well as could be expected. The gale of the 17th had broken up badly all the offshore ice beyond the six-mile limit, so that at the end of three hours we came to the meet- ‘jing line of the land-fast ice and the moving pack. Seal hunters \from the Belvedere and Polar Bear had assured us that for twenty or thirty miles offshore there had been since Christmas no move- ‘\ment of the ice before the 17th, but now it was an archipelago of jlarge ice islands floating in a sea of mush and water and moving ‘\past us to the east at the rate of half a mile an hour. ‘| We had some hope of heavy frost that night. Ten or fifteen hours of twenty or thirty degrees below zero would, had the wind ceased, have solidified everything into ice possible to travel over, although scarcely with safety, for the chief danger zone in polar ex- ‘joloration is the mush belt where the pack grinds itself into pieces against the edge of the land-fast ice. But the temperature in spite ‘pf calm did not go below zero, and although there was little motion n the ice outside of us, the next morning the conditions were by ‘no means ideal. By pressure from seaward the ice cakes were leaped against each other and against the shore floe, and as the season was too late for awaiting more favorable opportunity, we truck off on this insecure ice. For about a mile and a half we went m, crossing from cake to cake where the corners touched and occa- i 144 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC sionally over narrow cracks filled with loose mush ice that bore up the dogs and sledges, but compelled the men to lean their weight on the handle-bars to prevent themselves from breaking through. Even at this, some of them broke through enough to wet their feet. Then our progress was stopped not by adverse ice conditions but by the most serious and most nearly fatal accident I have ever seen in the North. Captain Bernard was still driving the lead- - ing sled just behind me when we passed over a little ice ridge not more than three feet high. From off this ridge on to the level ice beyond there was a sheer drop of between two and three feet, which is not a serious circumstance ordinarily, so that I did not even look around. But Captain Bernard unfortunately had his hands on the handle-bars and when the sled dropped failed to let go. By the weight of the sled he was pulled forward and fell on his forehead, striking the cross-piece between the handle-bars. There was a slight outcry, probably from some one else. When I looked around Captain Bernard was sitting on the level ice holding one hand to his forehead. A moment later he removed his hand, being about to stand up, when a flap of his scalp dropped down over his eyes, ex- posing the skull and hiding nearly all the face above the mouth. He had cut the scalp in an inverted curve from about an inch above the outer corner of the left eye to a little outside the outer corner of the right eye, the arch of the cut passing up over the entire forehead. We hastily pitched a tent, took some stitches in the wound, and carried the Captain ashore in an empty sled. Two men were at the handle-bars to keep it from upsetting and two were at the front end to ease it over the rough ice. In spite of this the Captain received a great deal of jolting which further increased the bleeding, so that by the time we got him ashore his underwear was soaked with blood and his boots nearly full of it, while his strength was so diminished that he had to be helped into the house. The marvel was that he did not once lose consciousness. Next morning it appeared both that the Captain’s wound would probably not prove serious and that we could not in any event do him any good by staying, so we started off again. The other men had meantime returned to the edge of the land-fast ice where they waited for us.’ It was true misfortune that Captain Bernard could not go on with the journey, for he was a good man from all points of view and his enthusiasm and cheerfulness were especially valu- able. His place was taken by Crawford, and McConnell was taken on as an extra man. He had caught up to us on the ice just before THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 145 the accident to Captain Bernard. He had arrived at Collinson Point several days after we left there and, although told he could prob- ably not catch up, he pluckily started after us, tired as he was from the long trip from Barrow. Unfortunately he had no means of knowing how badly we needed the sled he had been using, so he left it at Collinson Point for a lighter one with which he pushed on to Crawford’s camp at the Ulahula mouth. Here Crawford had joined him to help him on till he overtook us. The morning of March 23 when we had, as we thought, left all communication with land behind, he arrived at our camp while we were still asleep to give us the Barrow mail and beg for a chance to go along. Later it was he who volunteered to take the 14 stitches that were neces- sary to close the Captain’s wound. And a good job he made of it. Once more we were ready and fortune was against us. In an ordinary arctic winter the last two weeks of March should have an average temperature of twenty or thirty degrees below zero, but from the 20th to the 30th of that March we had weather that seldom went down to zero and occasionally almost up to the thaw- ing point. The ice outside the six-mile wide land floe, which had been broken up by the gale of the 17th, was now no longer subject to strong currents and was moving very sluggishly. It could have been set fast and firm by a single night of good frost. But this good frost refused to come. Just what moving sea ice is like may interest the general reader. A certain amount of ice in winter is frozen fast to the beach, and in some cases for a few hundred yards and in other cases several miles is grounded solidly upon a shallow bottom. But as you pro- ceed away from land you come to what we call the “floe,” or place where the edge of the shelf frozen fast to the land meets the moving pack. When the pack is in rapid motion, as after a severe gale, its speed on the north coast of Alaska may be as much as two miles an hour, rarely a little more. The ice masses are of all sizes and all thicknesses. When a heavy floe moves along the edge of the land ice in such a way as to rub against it, we say that the pack is “grinding.” Sometimes this is a terrific phenomenon. Instead of : a description of my own, I shall borrow one from the diary of Mc- y | Connell who now saw it for the first time. iF | “In the afternoon the Chief and his right-hand man, Mr. Stor- | kerson, went over to the lead, and when he returned he told Wilkins and me that we could see a sight worth seeing by walking over there, | but not to go too near the edge. It was a magnificent and awe- inspiring sight that met our eyes. The whole field on the other side ntl Wy 146 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC was in motion to the eastward and often would come in contact with the floe on which we stood. ‘Then the rending and tearing and crushing of the floes was almost deafening, and pieces of ice larger than an ordinary house would be tumbled about like corks in the water. The opposite floe would come tearing along at a speed of over a mile an hour, and when it encountered the land-fast ice something was sure to happen. Ridges thirty feet high and more - would be formed one moment, and tumble back into the sea the next as the pressure from the moving field was abated. Wilkins took my photograph with one of these ridges for a background. Then we returned to the tent with the first inkling, on my part at least, of the resistless power of the arctic ice in motion because of either current or wind. It was a weird and impressive sight. I was a little sobered by it.” The grinding of the floes against the land-fast ice and against each other makes what we call the “mush ice,” which may be a soft slush or may consist of fragments the size of your fist, the size of a kitchen range or of a house. As the floes spin about open patches of water of all shapes and sizes will form, to close again when the floes continue their revolution. After such a heavy gale as we had just had, pieces more than a dozen acres in area are rare in the vicinity of land ice, but the farther from land the larger the pieces, and fifty miles from shore the hardest gale will leave most of the ice still in the form of big, coherent masses, miles in diameter. Nat- urally, when the edges of such floes meet, a certain amount of mush ice is formed, no matter what the distance from shore. It is evident that no camp on sea ice is ever entirely safe. Even fifty miles from shore a crack may open in the middle of the floor of your snowhouse or tent, though the chances of this decrease with the distance from land. The original crack may be several hun- dred yards from camp, yet when the two floes begin to grind past each other the edges of both tend to break up. The greatest danger comes when the ice mass that strikes yours is traveling so that the lines of motion of the adjacent floe and of your floe intersect at_ some such small angle as ten to thirty degrees. Huge pieces are then torn rapidly off the edges of both floes if they are of similar thickness, or off the edge of the weaker. If you happen to be camped on the weaker one it behooves you to move quickly. Pieces of your floe the size of a city lot will rise on edge and tumble to- wards you, and the ice around camp and under will begin to groan and buckle and bend. Where it bends little rivers of sea water come rushing in, and where it buckles small pressure-ridges form. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 147 Since the relative speed of the floes can never differ by much more than two miles, the rate at which you have to flee is never more than two miles an hour and commonly less. Still, if the breaking up begins when you are sleeping, the awakening is abrupt and some- thing has to be done in a hurry. We have learned to make our winter camps so comfortable that when on land we always undress at night, and on the sea ice we do so whenever the camp site seems to be comparatively safe. One important aid to safety is that the tremors of breaking ice and the groaning of it are transmitted for miles through ice, where they might not be audible at all through the air. A snowhouse is so sound-proof that the barking and snarling of fighting dogs outside can seldom be heard, but their spurning of the snow and tumbling about is plainly audible, especially if you are lying in bed with your ear to the ice. This is how we hear dog-fights, which have to be promptly stopped. And this is how we hear the approach of a | bear, for the crunching of snow under his heavy tread can be heard | through the ice for even a hundred yards in spite of a gale whose whistle and hum would make it difficult for men to converse stand- ing close to each other out-of-doors. In case of a dog-fight or the | approach of a bear we commonly enough run out naked, no matter | what the temperature; for we find it true in fact as in theory that | a chilling of the entire body simultaneously produces no ill effects, and the fight can be stopped or the bear killed in from thirty sec- | onds to two minutes. But with the breaking up of ice it is different. When we feel | the quivers of the approaching pressure, or hear the detonations of | the breaking or the high-pitched squealing as one heavy flat piece _ | slides over another, one of us may run outside to spy out the situa- _}tion, but unless his report is most reassuring we dress as quickly jas firemen upon the ringing of an alarm. Clothes have no buttons _ \and shoes no laces, and it isn’t long till we are ready to move. The jsleds are kept loaded except for bedding and cooking gear, and jthese can be rapidly taken from camp and added. Harnessing \the dogs is also a quick process; each man can harness about two ‘dogs per minute. | In our five years of work on moving ice it has never actually happened that we had to flee precipitately except on one occasion, _ |when by good fortune our sleds were already loaded. But it has _ joften happened during the day’s march that a situation quite as dangerous, though not so startling, has developed. This is when We are traveling across ice that has been grinding and is still under 148 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC pressure, crossing from one cake to another by the corners where they touch. If we find ourselves upon a weak cake a few acres in area that is surrounded on all sides by stronger cakes, its edges crumple up if the pressure is steady, and a ring of ice ridges begins to form around. As the pressure continues the ridges get higher and the area of our cake gets smaller. It is a rather uncomfortable thing to have these ridges marching towards you slowly from all - sides, with a noise that is anything between a slight rumble and a deafening roar, and the ice shivering where you stand. The worst thing is that the shivering and the crashing will paralyze the dogs with fear and make them worse than useless. This is where we need several men for each sled. The thing to do is to select some rather low place in one of the advancing ridges where the motion is slower and there is a solid floe beyond. To find such a place is difficult, more difficult because the weight of the forming ridge depresses the edge of your floe and causes a moat of sea water to separate it from you. At twenty or thirty degrees below zero the dogs are even more afraid of putting their feet in the water than of putting them upon moving pieces of ice. If there are four or five men with two sledges, as has been the case in some of our trips, we take the teams one at a time and usually have little trouble in dragging dogs and sleds over the ridge, for the tumbling motion of the cakes is slow enough to cause a sure-footed man no great trouble. When there are only three of us there is the advantage of only one sled, with no return trips necessary. But there is the disadvantage that with one man at the handle-bars to keep it from upsetting, the other two men are scarcely stronger than the six dogs, and we should be unable to move the sled at all were it not that the scared dogs seldom balk in unison, and two or three will be pulling ahead when the others | | are pulling back. In an emergency of this sort the style of harness- |. ing is important, and it is especially here that I favor the tandem system where each dog is kept in his place between the two traces. | In harness such as is used in Nome the dogs have too much freedom | and are able to turn completely around and face the sled. The fan | system used in Greenland and which we have used in Victoria Is- | land is even worse, for there each dog has complete freedom and can pull in any direction he likes. Breaking ice would mean a greatly complicated danger during darkness. For this reason we frequently camp an hour or two ear- lier when we come upon an exceptionally firm ice cake that promises | a night without a break-up, or travel three or four hours longer | ‘ THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 149 when we fail to discover one firm enough for a campsite. It is for this reason too that we do not care to leave land in the beginning of our ice journey until after the first part of February in any year, for before that the nights are so long that the probability of getting into ice pressure during darkness is very high. This danger is not so great if your base on land is in some region of sluggish ice move- ment, such as northern Prince Patrick Island or Ellef Ringnes Is- land or, to judge from his account, Peary’s starting point, Cape Columbia. But any one beginning a journey from a region of vio- lent ice movement, such as the north coast of Alaska where we worked, or the northeastern coast of Siberia where Baron Wrangel worked nearly a century earlier, is taking serious chances if he starts out before the full moon of February. Bright moonlight gives most help after sunlight in ice travel, but cloudy nights hold danger, and for a reason special to arctic latitudes. Sea ice is seldom in reality smooth, but when sun or moon is behind clouds it will appear smooth through absence of shadow. In the more commonplace latitudes the hole out of which you have just pried a stone looks distinctly different from the stone lying beside it, no matter what the conditions of light, so long as you can see at all. That is because the stone is gray or brown or some other shade which differs from the earth walls of the hole. But in the frozen sea a boulder of ice and a hole beside it are just about the same shade of white or blue, and you cannot see either unless in the relief produced by shadows. Now either sun or moon shining in* a clear sky will cast sharp shadows; but neither will do so when obscured by clouds, though either may give diffused light enough | to reveal a man or stone at half a mile or a mountain at twenty | miles. On the rough sea ice you may on an unshadowed day, with- |} out any warning from the keenest eyes, fall over a chunk of ice | that is knee high or walk against a cake on edge that rises like the | wall of a house. Or you may step into a crack that just admits your | foot or into a hole big enough to be your grave. It is the strain on _ | the eyes on such days of diffused light, the attempt to detect almost | or quite undetectible hindrances, that makes us snowblind in ' | cloudy weather more easily than on the most shimmeringly clear | day. And bad as the cloudy day is the cloudy night is worse. In taking the chance of starting on a polar journey late in Janu- - | ary or early in February, the encouraging factor is that your great ' | danger zone is a narrow one in the vicinity of land, and if you have _}a period of a week or so of calm and intensely frosty weather it / |may be temporarily quiescent, so that by a sort of dash you may 150 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC be able to get forty or fifty miles offshore before the first gale strikes, beyond which distance we consider travel to be reasonably safe, no matter how little the daylight. In our present case there would have been no wisdom in leav- ing the land-fast ice for the mush beyond. For ten days the frost had amounted to so little that the mush remained congealed. Light snow was also falling now and then, blanketing the weak places, © not only preventing freezing but disguising the danger spots. It was naturally tedious to remain encamped on the edge of the shore floe only six miles from the land, especially with spring almost upon us and the chances of success diminishing day by day; but there was no other sensible thing to do. In the water at the floe’s edge seals were numerous, and partly to have something to do and partly because we knew that our people ashore were a little short of meat for dog feed, we killed a number with a view of taking them ashore. Now came a day when one of our kerosene tanks sprung a leak. We had two, each holding about six gallons, so that the loss of the contents of one was more than we could afford. I had intended at first that Wilkins should retain his motion picture camera forty or | fifty miles offshore, thinking he might get some interesting pictures | of moving ice and possibly of polar bears, but I now concluded that | time would be so precious if we ever got away from the land floe that we could not afford either to stop for pictures or to carry the | camera itself. So one day about noon I asked Wilkins and Castel to make a quick trip ashore, taking back the camera and the leaking | tank as well as three or four seals, and returning with a sound tank | full of oil. We had already been over this trail twice, first in | coming out, then in taking the injured captain ashore, and the — round trip would under ordinary circumstances have been made in | about four hours. | When Wilkins’ party left us, the shore could be seen through | a slight haze and there was a gentle breeze from the southwest. Two hours later, when they should have been nearly ashore, there | were heavy snowflakes falling and the rising wind had in it the prom- ise of a gale. It seems that the gale began with them a little sooner than it did with us, for I learned later that by the time they got ashore it was blowing so hard that they had great trouble in getting | the dogs to face the wind going up the hundred yards or so to the | house, and after unhitching them, Wilkins has told me he himself had to crawl the distance on his hands and knees. Six hours from | the time Wilkins and Castel left us we were in one of the worst of arctic gales. I have heard that the ancmometer at Collinson Point [ oe ‘WIVED) GHL quodag AO] AHL NO dWVO AH], a ee Se a es ‘{JLIPS OOM OM MOTH OY YOIYA UO aol OLOYsYO oy} sossu[Sppoy YUM Duryoresg ‘GO] GUOHY THL NO SNIMTIA ratmannen ance «ete Se enero eT NON SARE SNA RAMEE CR THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 151 fifty miles away registered 86 miles per hour, which may have been lower than the wind was, because these instruments tend to clog through thickening of their lubricating oil at low temperatures. The mild spell of the last few days had been too warm for snow- houses, and we were living in tents which, although good as tents go, were very unsatisfactory in such weather. Although the ice we were on had been frozen to the beach all winter and in ordinary weather would have remained so till spring, we realized that a piece of it might break off and carry us with it out to sea. Andreasen, Crawford, Storkerson and I took turns standing watch outdoors, but this was really only a matter of form, for the blizzard was so thick that even while there was daylight one’s eyes could be opened only momentarily, and the howl of the gale and the flapping of the tent made it impossible to hear the noise of groaning ice which we could have heard easily inside a snowhouse. Many gales in the North last for three days, but this one had | abated by the following morning, and at noon it was practically over. At first it did not seem as if anything particular had happened. Looking towards shore we could not see the mountains, but this | was not surprising, for a haze commonly hangs over them for some | time after a storm. To find out the situation I walked towards | shore along the sled trail which should have wound in and out among grounded pressure-ridges for six miles towards the beach. But it did | so no longer, for in less than half a mile I came to an expanse of | open water several miles wide. Clearly the “tide” had risen during | the gale, as it always does with violent sou’westers in this region. The field of ice which was ours had first been lifted off the bottom and then been broken off from the land floe, and we were afloat on | 1t and being carried we did not for the present know where. When I got back to camp with this news the air had cleared to- | wards the land and we could see the mountains. The Endicott range to the south had been familiar to Storkerson and me for six years. We knew every peak. There was no doubting the evidence of our eyes, although it was a little startling to realize that the mountains abreast of us were those which had been forty miles to the east at noon the previous day when our two companions started for shore. From the very slight elevation of the peaks above the -jhorizon we judged that instead of being six miles we were now twenty miles from the beach. __ This was the second misfortune of a trip which as yet had hardly _jbegun. The separation from us of Wilkins and Castel was in its effect more serious than the injury to Bernard. They were both ex- 152 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC cellent men, and Castel had been intended as the third man with Storkerson and me to make the advance ice trip. But we still had good men, so that the most serious blow was that the two had taken with them some of the best dogs, one of our two good sleds, and some tools and other special equipment that were in a bag per- manently attached to the sled. The lack of these tools was for months afterwards an inconvenience which amounted to a serious handicap, while the loss of the sled compelled an immediate read- justment of plans. Of the four sleds we had when we left shore, two were very good and two almost worthless. These worthless sleds were to have been sent back about fifty miles from shore. Now we had only one good sled left. CHAPTER XV THE FIRST FIFTY MILES unloaded and the contents dumped on the ice. With one sled less, it was impossible to take along the same amount of stuff. The first task was to go through our possessions and discard what could most easily be discarded. We threw away some food and some spare clothing, and planted a flag on a high ice hummock, thinking this cake might drift inshore and be discovered by some Eskimo seal hunters or even by Wilkins and Castel. We knew that they would make some attempt to rejoin us, but felt that it was sure to be futile, for not only was there an expanse of impassable water between us and land, but there was no means by which they could tell how far east or to seaward we had drifted. The second day after the gale we were able to commence travel- ing. The ice was under no pressure now, for the storm had blown it offshore and had drifted our island against the edge of the pack where it had stuck fast. The temperature, to our great distress, continued warm—never below zero, Fahrenheit. Still, as there was no pressure, the mush solidified enough in two nights to permit crossing in several places, although we were able to make only three miles the first traveling day. In some cases where the cracks be- tween floes were no more than three to five yards wide, we used to bridge them by chopping ice for an hour or two with our pickaxes and throwing the fragments into the water until their combined buoyancy was enough to support the sled during the crossing. And the farther from shore we got, the fewer the cracks we had to cross. A lead of open water appeared in front of us on April 4th. We could have crossed it by using the sled boat, but because in half a dozen such crossings the mush ice would have chafed holes in the canvas we did not do so. Furthermore, the pack was in motion and | we expected the lead to close at any time, giving an easy cross- ing. So we did no traveling that day. To encourage the men, and to demonstrate to them how easy it was to make a living at sea, I shot a number of seals and so did 153 Bens Wilkins went ashore his sled had of course been 154 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Storkerson and some of the others. A few animals sank but we re- covered six. When there seemed no use in killing more, I oiled the barrel of my rifle, as I always do when the temperature is not low, put it in its case and strapped the case on a sled. Meantime the men had made a bonfire of blubber and cooked some fresh seal meat. While we were feasting there was a sudden commotion among the dogs, which were still hitched to the sleds, for we expected to cross the lead at any moment. The sled with my rifle strapped on it was about six feet from the water, the other sleds only a little farther away, while the fire over which we were cooking was about twenty yards. The cause of the barking was a polar bear, the first one that some of the men had seen. By the time he arrived the lead had closed to a width of not more than five yards and on the very brink of it was the bear, pacing up and down, trying to make up his mind to plunge in, like a bather reluctant to take a dive into cold water. I don’t know what it really was made him hesitate. It can hardly have been the chill of the water, though he gave distinctly that impression. But even while I theorized about his motives and be- havior, there came to mind the need for instant action, for some of the excited dogs might jump into the water to get at him, dragging a sled after them. Were the bear to cross the lead to our side the dogs, all tangled in their harness, would doubtless attack him. He would probably run away, but there was no certainty of it. Clearly he bore no hostility towards them nor had he any fear of their barking, or of the shouting of the six men who ran back and forth telling each other what to do. According to his own account McConnell must have been one of the coolest of us, for he said afterwards that he immediately ran for his camera, asking us to wait until he got a picture. To get at my rifle I had to run around to the side of the sled nearest the lead, and while I was unstrapping the case my back was towards the bear about five yards from me. Storkerson’s rifle was on the sled next to mine, and while he was getting it I noticed that I was in direct line between him and the bear. He had his rifle first, for it had not been lashed to the sled, and seeing that he was likely to fire I requested him to be careful to get the bear and not me. There was doubtless no likelihood of the mistake, but I thought a word of caution wouldn’t hurt.. When it came the explosion was so close to my ear as to leave me partly deaf for some time. The bullet struck the bear, of course, and probably surprised him as much as it hurt. He was leaning over the water just getting ready to THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 155 dive and was startled into falling on his back in the lead, splashing water over me as he fell. The water was perfectly clear and look- ing around I saw him going down like a sounding lead, with his feet at first uppermost, though he soon straightened out, rose to the surface and scrambled up on the far side. As he was strug- gling out, Storkerson gave him a second shot and a moment later as he was running away a third; but the rifle was only a .30-30 and, although he was bleeding profusely, the bear was making off with considerable speed. For the further encouragement of the party, to prove that no bear could come as close to us as this and get away, I thought I had better try the Mannlicher. This shot rolled him over and I took the story to be ended. After I had turned away to put the rifle back in the case he got unsteadily to his feet and dis- appeared behind an ice cake. The lead had been gradually closing, and Crawford, with a rifle and McConnell with a camera, were able to follow and find him about two hundred yards away, trying to cross a second lead. They fired several times, but when I got over he had crawled out on the ice, so that one more shot was necessary. It is always so when a group becomes excited—there is a hullabaloo and a fusillade of wasteful shooting. One bullet near the heart does a great deal more damage than a dozen badly placed, as many of these were, for some were in the paws, some in the neck and some in other fleshy parts. | An exciting bear hunt may be interesting to read about but it is a poor hunt. One properly located Mannlicher bullet is all that | should be necessary. On shore polar bears are ordinarily timid animals, afraid of men, and afraid of dogs and wolves. But the behavior of this visitor was typical of bears far from shore. There they have no } enemy to fear. Besides their own kind they are familiar on the ice- | pack with only three living things—the seals, on which they live, | the white foxes which they unintentionally provide with food but | which never come near enough to be caught themselves, and the gulls which ery loudly and flutter about them at their meals. Zodl- } ogists know, but it is not commonly realized by the laity, that the _} white fox is almost as much of a sea animal as the polar bear, for probably 90 per cent. of white foxes spend their winters on the ice. They are not able at sea to provide their own living, so several | will be found following a bear wherever he goes. When the bear | kills a seal he eats all he wants, usually from a quarter to half of the carcass. In many cases he touches none of the meat, but eats merely a portion of the blubber and the skin that goes with it. 156 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC After this satiating meal he probably feels as if he will never care to eat again and goes away to sleep under a neighboring hummock leaving for the foxes what is left. It is not likely that he will come back, but if he did, the foxes would hop and the gulls flutter away. From long experience he gets the impression that these creatures are not the least bit dangerous, but too elusive to be caught. Without doubt the bear is able to tell the difference between a living seal and the meat of a dead one when he sniffs them in the air. There is always seal meat in our baggage and the smell is always about our camp. When a bear passes to leeward he must perceive the many camp odors, but the only one which interests him is that of the seal meat. Knowing no fear, he comes straight into camp, walking leisurely because he does not expect the dead seals which he smells to escape him; neither has he in mind any hostility or disposition to attack, for, through long experience with foxes and gulls, he expects any living thing he meets to make way for him. But if on coming within a hundred or two hundred yards of camp he happens to see a sleeping dog, and especially if the dog were to move slightly, as is common enough, the bear apparently thinks, “Well, that is a live seal, after all!” He then instantly makes himself unbelievably flat on the icé, and with neck and snout touching the snow advances almost toboggan-fashion toward the dogs, stopping dead if one of them moves, and advancing again when they become quiet. If there is any unevenness in the ice, as there nearly always is in the vicinity of our camps—we choose such camping places—he will take cover behind a hummock and advance in its shelter. Our dogs are always tied, for in the dead of night a good dog may be killed or incapacitated in their fights with one another in less time than it takes a sleepy man to wake up and interfere. But we know the danger from approaching polar bears and endeavor to scatter the dogs in such a way that while a bear is approaching one dog in an exposed situation, another will get the animal’s wind. Usually, too, we tie the dogs to windward of the camp, so that the bear shall have to pass us before he comes to them. When one dog sees or smells the bear he commences barking, and in a second every other dog is barking. At once the bear loses interest. He apparently thinks, “After all, this is not a seal, but a fox or a gull.” His mind reverts to the seal meat he has been smelling, he gets up from his flat position and resumes his leisurely walk toward the camp. By that time, even though we may have been asleep, one of THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 157 us will be out with a rifle, and a properly placed bullet ends the story. When the bear comes as this one did in broad daylight, with the dogs awake and the men moving about, he apparently takes the dogs and us for a variety of gull, noisier perhaps than any he has heard, but no more dangerous. In a party used to bears the men stand with guns ready, while the one who is to do the killing sits quietly and waits until in his natural zigzag approach the bear exposes one side or the other so as to give a chance for the shot near the heart. When we resumed our journey April 5th we left behind not only the bear carcass but most of the killed seals, partly because we could not haul them and partly because the time for the return of the support party was approaching and we thought they might be able to pick up the meat on their way ashore—emphasis is on the “might,” because we were still so near shore that the ice floes had considerable difference of motion and were, besides, spinning on their axes. The return party did in due course try to follow the trail back towards shore, but proved unable to do so for more than a few miles and never saw this meat cache again nor the floe upon which it had been made. Just as had been the case with Baron Wrangel a century earlier in a similar region north of Siberia, they came across their old trails occasionally on the way ashore, but found them leading east or west or south as commonly as north, because of the floes having spun around during the interval. We had reached next day what is known as the edge of the Continental Shelf. Up to this point the ocean depth had been in- creasing a little more than a fathom to the mile as we went farther from land, but here in a mile or two it increased to a hundred and fifty fathoms. The soundings had been taken by Mr. Johansen who, as marine biologist, also made what investigations he could of the sea temperatures at various depths, and of the minute animal and | plant life of the water. We had found seals in 180 fathoms, killed , them and hauled them safely up on the ice. This encouraged the | whole party. We still had more food with us than could possibly be hauled | on the good sled intended for the advance journey. The other two sleds were so frail and kept breaking so frequently that the delays | in repairing them more than cancelled any advantage of their addi- _| tional transporting power. I therefore made up my mind to send | the support party back at this point. By them I sent instructions 158 : THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC to Dr. Anderson, the second in command of the expedition. These instructions are so important for the understanding of future events that a summary of them must be given. Before leaving Collinson Point I had, to guard against the pos- sibility of our not returning to shore befcre the ice broke up, left with Dr. Anderson certain instructions to cover that eventuality. I had also discussed with him, with Storkerson, and with others, my plan to proceed to Banks or Prince Patrick Island in case the drift of the ice made it necessary, or in case we found we could not get satisfactory results on the basis of a return by sled to Alaska. There was also the possibility of finding new land—remote, it is true, especially because of our late start. If land were found, [ had expressed my intention to spend a year there. Or, I had said, we might go to Prince Patrick or Banks Island, partly because of the data to be secured on the way and partly to explore those islands during the summertime and to kill deer and dry the meat and skins for use as provisions and clothing the coming winter. This second letter to Dr. Anderson emphasized the increasing possibility that we might go to Banks Island instead of returning to Alaska and instructed him more particularly than before as to certain things. The main point of both previous and present in- structions was that in case of the non-return to Alaska of my party in the spring of 1914, he was to assume that we had landed at the northwest corner of Banks Island or the southwest corner of Prince Patrick Island. He would then find himself in command of the vessels in Alaska, of which he was to make the following disposi- tion. With the Alaska and as much cargo as she could carry and with certain members of the expedition, he was to proceed to the main- land shore of Dolphin and Union Straits. In that vicinity he was to select a winter base for the southern section of the expedition to occupy the coming year and possibly a second year following. With the Alaska were to go two oil-burning launches, which I had purchased especially for use in surveying river deltas and among the hundreds of small islands of Coronation Gulf. The Mary Sachs, under Captain Bernard, was to take a cargo of goods into the same region, landing them there at the winter quarters of the Alaska or at some neighboring point preferred by Dr. Anderson. The Mary Sachs was then to return to Herschel Island and if the season still allowed, which was probable, take a second cargo from there to Cape Kellett at the southwest corner of Banks Island; or possibly, if the conditions seemed favorable, up i | | | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 159 the west coast of Banks Island to Norway Island, but not farther. In other words, the Sachs was to establish, presumably at Cape Kellett but possibly farther north, a permanent base of supplies to which any party might retreat in case of shipwreck or other mis- fortune farther north, or to which they might return when their work farther north had been completed. But the most important item was that the North Star, under command of Wilkins, was to come as early in the season as she could to Banks Island and was to proceed northward along the coast with the expectation of possibly meeting us at Norway Island. In case she failed to find us or records left by us at Norway Island, she was to proceed, if she could, across McClure Strait to Prince Patrick Island, on the presumption that we would be waiting her there. The North Star was a vessel especially suited to such plans, first of all because she had a single propeller. The twin propellers of the Sachs rendered her the least suitable of our three ships for ice navigation, good as she was in open water, for being located at the sides instead of amidships, these propellers stuck out at such angles that they were very likely to be broken off by the ice. This was the reason I did not expect the Sachs to go north beyond Kellett unless she found the ice conditions especially favorable. But the little Star, under her former owner, Captain Matt Andreasen, had shown herself the most competent craft that had ever come to this part of the Arctic for a certain kind of ice navigation. In the spring, when the rivers open and the thaw water begins to flow in little and big streams off all parts of the coast, the sea ice is melted by this comparatively warm land water, and an open lane is formed along the beach, while the heavier grounded ice is still continuous along the coast a few hundred yards farther to sea, and the pack is still heavy in the offing. With her fifty-two feet length and draft of four feet two inches loaded, the Star was able to make good progress along this lane when a clumsier boat of deeper draft could have made none at all. My hope was that in this way the Star would be able to wriggle up along the Banks Island coast and get as far north as Norway Island early. Of course she could not carry much of a cargo (per- haps twenty tons, though Captain Andreasen said he had once car- ried twenty-seven), but with our plan of exploration this disadvan- tage did not weigh much against her superiority as an ice boat. She could bring four or five men and a dog team or two and am- munition, with kerosene for our primus stoves and a few things of 160 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC that sort which are convenient to have even under a system of living on the country. These she would probably be able to carry much farther north than either the Alaska or the Sachs; and in any sys- tem of polar exploration a base far north is of paramount impor- tance, although not quite as important to us as to those explorers who believe in freighting with them on sledge journeys their food and fuel. I had bought the Star from Captain Andreasen only a short while before leaving the Alaska coast, and had planned all along to put her under the command of Wilkins, of whom I had already formed almost as high an opinion as his later service to the expe- dition justified. Although the Arctic is a place of uncertainties where schedules can seldom be adhered to, I had thus high hopes of meeting Wilkins and the Star in August at northern Banks or southern Prince Patrick Island. Carrying these instructions to our men ashore the support party, Crawford, Johansen, and McConnell, left us at 70° 13’ N. latitude and 140° 30’ W. longitude, on the afternoon of April 7th. They had with them for a journey landward of fifty miles full rations for thirty-one days for the men and about twenty-five days for the dogs. We provided so much more than they needed because we had no means of carrying the supplies ourselves, and because we were unable to give them a rifle for sealing. With Wilkins’ and Castel’s rifles gone and also the ammunition that had been in the bag at- tached to their sled, the advance party needed both of the remaining two, for not only was the journey across the ice to the northwest cor- ner of Banks Island far too long to make on supplies we could haul, but there was hunting to be done in Banks or Prince Patrick Island to lay up winter food for the dogs and crew of the Star. It is also always possible that one rifle may break, and one other offers by no means a large margin of safety when your hunting means your sub- sistence. With more mature experience, I would now never make a long trip with less than one rifle for each man. We have on some trips carried an extra rifle carefully packed away in a heavy case to be protected against accidents and reserved for an emergency. I have learned from McConnell’s diary, a copy of which he kindly gave me at the end of the expedition, that the party on their way ashore had a good deal of trouble with open water, and with high pressure-ridges where it was necessary to build a road with pickaxes and where in one case they were able to make good only a few hundred yards in a whole day of struggle. On one occasion being without a rifle they had something of a fright from three polar THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 161 bears which approached their camp but consented to be scared away. After nine marches they reached shore on April 16th, where they fell in with Constable Parsons of the Royal Northwest Mounted Police, on his way to Herschel Island from a visit to the Belvedere. He told them that all the people along the coast, whalers and trap- pers and Eskimos alike, had given our party up for dead after the gale which carried us off from the shore ice. Since that time we have traveled over the ice north of Alaska so long and so safely that it now seems curious even to these same Eskimos and whalers, as I know from conversation with them, that they could in 1914 have had such exaggerated notions of the dangers of ice travel. I remember especially one conversation in 1914, just before we left the Alaska coast, with Captain Mogg, a whaler of more than twenty years’ experience, which illustrates the then common point of view. The captain told me that one day just about Christmas he had gone to the top of Herschei Island, which is about five hundred feet high, and had looked to the north without seeing any sign of open water or of anything except firm and stationary sea ice. The next day when the weather had cleared after a brief gale he had gone to the top of the island and had seen a belt of ice about a mile wide still clinging to the shore and beyond that open ocean, the pack having “gone abroad” before the gale. After a dramatic recital Captain Mogg turned to me and said, “Supposing, with your scientific notions, you had been off on that ice the day before when the gale struck—where in hell would you have been then?” It was obvious that Captain Mogg supposed I would have been at the sea bottom. It did not occur to him that a cake of ice may be a very seaworthy craft, and that when you are floating away on a large one you may have no more evidence that you are moving than do the people who sleep peacefully at night on shore while the earth is spinning on its axis. CHAPTER XVI WE ENTER UPON THE UNKNOWN OCEAN northerly point ever reached by ships in this region in sum- mer. In winter no human beings of any race had been nearly so far from the Alaska coast at this longitude. We were three men alone on the edge of the unknown. To that extent the situation had been duplicated before. Nansen and Johansen had been only two. But they were using a tried method—they had food to carry them nearly or quite to land, and would begin to live by hunting only as the journey approached its end. But we were facing the unknown part of the arctic sea with a method not only untried, but disbelieved in by all but ourselves. My companions went about their work quietly, but I know they felt no less than I our dramatic position. Were there animals in abundance waiting jn the “polar ocean with- out life’? Upon the answer depended not only our lives and our success, but a new view of the world we live in. Since the days before Magellan when men of equal standing could argue about whether the world was flat or round there has been no more fundamental geographic issue than the one we were about to resolve: is the arctic region barren and in its nature hostile to life; or is it hostile merely to life of a southern type and to men who live like southerners, and friendly to any man or animal that will meet the North on its own terms? We were staking our lives on the right- ness of the unpopular side of this controversy. But we did not think our lives were in serious danger, and so our resolve was not quite so heroic as it sounds at first. Though Columbus had both numbers and authorities against him, I doubt he ever lost much sleep for fear of his ship plunging in the night over the western edge of a flat world. Contrary to custom in polar narrative, we have so far said little ‘he support party turned towards land at about the most about a traveling outfit. This difference in narrative corresponds to | a difference in method. Other arctic explorers have relied for sub- sistence exclusively or mainly on what they brought with them when we relied mainly upon the resources of the country to be traversed. Also there is little point in telling just what we took at 162 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 163 the start, when some of it was lost early, some had to be thrown away, and some had to be sent back. When the support party left us we had an outfit that was to last a year and a half in case of necessity; for at the beginning of a trip we always expect that in addition to the immediate summer for which the outfit is designed, we may have to spend the coming winter in some uninhabited region, and again need it to take us to some inhabited place the second spring. The final party who were going North into the unknown to seek new information, to find new lands if there should be any, and to try out a new theory of polar exploration were Storker Storkerson, Ole Andreasen and myself. The final outfit consisted of six dogs, the most powerful that we could get and four of them the best dogs I have ever used, and a load of 1,236 pounds on a 208-pound sled, which meant that each dog was hauling 240 pounds. In my diary for April 7th I say that we had full rations for men for about thirty days and dog | feed for about forty days. In a way this food was the least im- | portant part of our load, for our theory of outfitting is that the | essentials are rifles, ammunition and other hunting gear, the scien- | tific instruments, cameras and photographic supplies, diaries, spare | clothing, bedding and cooking utensils. After these we take on as } much food and fuel as can be hauled without making the load too | heavy. Hauling fuel is more important than hauling food, and the | kind of fuel more important than the kind of food. Better kero- jsene burnt in a blue-flame stove than seal blubber burnt by any | method we have so far devised, whereas the choice of the most delect- | able food over seal or caribou meat is negligible to our comfort. | A primus stove cooks more rapidly than a seal-oil lamp and is | more cleanly than an outdoor fire of seal blubber. But we had lost half our twelve gallons of fuel with Wilkins, and kerosene was des- | tined to give out sooner than food. As a hunting outfit we had one Gibbs-Mannlicher-Schoenauer 6.5 millimeter rifle with 170 rounds of ammunition, and one Win- chester .30-30 carbine with 160 rounds. As scientific equipment we carried two sextants with the neces- -isary tables for computing latitude and longitude, two thermometers, aneroid barometer, several prismatic compasses, a sounding ma- chine with several leads and about 10,000 feet of wire. The time determining longitude was carried by an ordinary watch and by 7 a Waltham astronomical watch. The dial of this Waltham watch was numbered to twenty-four hours instead of twelve, a great con- | 164 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC venience and almost necessity because in summer when the sun never sets and when at times there is thick, foggy weather for many days in succession, it is often a matter of doubt, if you carry an ordinary watch, whether it shows twelve o’clock midnight or twelve o’clock noon. One may think that only extraordinary carelessness would make you lose track of time so far that you are in doubt which of the twelve-hour periods you are in, but it happens fre- quently. Under special conditions we may travel fifteen or twenty hours continuously, at times through the most exhausting kind of going. At the end of this you may happen to get a blizzard which induces you to rest in camp a while, free to sleep as long as you need or desire. Where there is no darkness one’s irregularity of habits becomes extraordinary. We may not feel any special in- convenience from staying awake twenty or thirty hours, and we are equally likely to sleep for fifteen or eighteen hours. More than once it has happened that we could argue as to whether we were breakfasting in the morning or in the evening. But it never has happened that we have slept so far beyond the twenty-four hours recorded by the Waltham astronomical as to be in doubt of the time it records. The first day after the support party-left us we were able to travel only a few hundred yards before being stopped by open water, and as we had to stop, anyhow, I killed a seal that had stuck his head up through some half-frozen mush. He was within reach of my manak, but I could not pull him in because the forming young ice offered too much resistance. The temperature at 8 o’clock that evening was 11° F. but falling, and at that frost we thought the mush might harden enough so that in the morning by the use of skis we could walk out and get him. But our warm period was not yet over and the temperature rose again. Now that I have mentioned skis I might say something about their usefulness in polar work. I have heard one explorer say that they are better than snowshoes because it is easier to kill dogs with them. This advantage never appealed to us, since we never had any dogs to be killed and have further found that with a good dog kindness works better than a whip. I can not remember the time when I did not know how to walk on skis, and as a boy there was no sport I enjoyed so much as sliding down hill on them. But I have never found them of any particular use in polar work except in restricted areas. Amundsen used them around King William Island and quite properly, for there the ice is level, as it is at Coronation Gulf and at many other points where the sea is shielded THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 165 by one or another of the islands of the Arctic Archipelago. They are probably well adapted, too, to the level expanses of the Ant- arctic continent. Where the ice is smooth or the land flat, skis are useful, especially before a fair wind when one can glide almost without effort and at a higher speed than is attainable on snow- shoes. But such places are rare in the areas we have had to explore. Among the jaggedly broken ice of the open ocean skis are almost as much out of place as in a thick forest. We would not carry them at all except that they are useful in constructing the frame of our sled boat, a process to be described later. For this purpose we al- ways have a pair or two along, and on rare occasions use them to walk on. On this trip my companions were both Norwegians and habituated to skis, yet none of us thought of using them. I am now of the opinion, however, that late in the spring after the snow begins thawing in the daytime and freezing with a hard crust at night, it might be advisable to use them occasionally where the ice is less rough. The hunting snowshoe of one of several Indian models is a very useful thing in any except the roughest ice. The type used by the Eskimos on the north coast of Alaska—with a length of between three and four feet and a greatest width of about ten inches—is the most convenient. By the beginning of the present ice trip both Storkerson and I had spent over five years with the Eskimos of northern Canada and Alaska, dressing as they did and making camp after their fashion. It is therefore probable that few arctic explorers have been quite as familiar as we with the technique of comfort. A classic fea- ture of the popular polar narrative is the discomfort of life in camp, but this can never truthfully mark any of our stories. We had an important advantage over even such masters of arctic tech- nique as Peary in the difference of our theory of fuel supply and the consequent temperature of our camps. Peary’s parties depended on alcohol or kerosene in limited quantity, which they hoarded, knowing that on the polar ice there are no stores or oil supply sta- | tions. And they were always on strict fuel rations. The cooking | apparatus was specially designed to concentrate all the heat against | the bottom of the cooking pot, allowing as little as possible to es- cape into the body of the snowhouse or tent. When the pot came to | a boil the fire was instantly extinguished. This was certainly nec- | essary if the fuel was to last the whole journey. But with us there are supply stations wherever we go. Our cooking apparatus is not | designed to conserve heat, for we want heat to spread and when the cooking is done we do not extinguish the fire until the house is as 166 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC warm as we care to have it. Then if the camp gets a little too cool we light it again. Whenever the kerosene we leave home with gives out a seal will supply us with blubber; and that blubber we burn freely because we know there is another seal to be had where the last one came from. One result of this comfortable life is that our diary entries are voluminous on days of idleness. We use fountain pens, and sit lightly clad while we write of everything seen or thought of since the last preceding idle day. April 8th was such a day. The lead that had stopped us the day before had indeed closed, but when we crossed it we were able to travel for a mile only before we were stopped by another lead and had to make camp. After supper had been cooked and the dogs fed, I noted in my diary that for the fifty miles since leaving shore we had never seen a cake of ice of a probable area of over ten square miles, and most had been only a few acres in extent. As they were in sluggish motion a great deal of open water was visible between, and in this water there com- | monly had been seals. | We had seen very little ice more than a year old. We have | already pointed out that ice which has weathered one or more sum- mers is easy to distinguish from that of the current winter by sight and by taste. When sea ice forms it is salty, although perhaps not | quite so salty as the water from which it is made, and probably | during the winter it loses a certain amount of its salt, although | even in April or May ice formed the previous October is still too } salty for ordinary cooking uses. But in June and July when rains | begin and snow melts and little rivulets trickle here and there over | the ice, forming in the latter part of summer a network of lakes con- | nected by channels of sluggishly flowing water, the saltiness dis- | appears, or at least that degree of it which is perceptible to the palate, and the following year this ice is the potential source of the purest possible cooking or drinking water. The ponds on top of | the ice are also fresh. During the melting of summer the pressure- | ridges and the projecting snags of broken ice change in outline. | When the ice has been freshly broken it may well be compared with | the masses of rock in a granite quarry just after the blast, or if it is thinner, with the broken-bottle glass on top of an English stone wall. But during the summer all the sharp outlines are softened on | the pressure-ridges, so that at the end of the first summer they are no more jagged than a typical mountain range, and at the end of |} two or three years they resemble the rolling hills of a western |} prairie. The old ice is easily recognizable at a distance by its out- | | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 167 line and on closer approach by the fact that the hummocks are frequently glare. That can never be the case with salty ice, which is sticky and therefore always has snow adhering to it. Being glare, the old ice gives poor footing for men and dogs, yet we com- monly prefer it as being smoother. It is not really smooth, but like rolling hills from which the angles of youth have been smoothed by weathering. Young ice is frequently heaped up in indescribable confusion, the jagged ridges of it sometimes fifty or sixty feet above water level and occasionally so rough that an unharnessed dog is unable to make his way over it. When we come to such ridges we have to make a road with pickaxes and progress is occasionally less than a hundred yards per hour. We had had a large number on the way from shore, but they were already getting noticeably fewer, lower, and less difficult to traverse. April 9th we could make only two miles northing, being com- pelled to camp by a rising gale. For an hour the wind had been in- creasing from the southwest, with the snowflakes falling more thickly, when we decided to pick a camp site. We chose it in the lee of a ridge about thirty feet high giving a degree of shelter, but when we were about to pitch the tent Andreasen (whom we always called Ole, and shall in this book hereafter) noticed a crack in the | ice. This raised the question of whether the ice was more likely to break in the vicinity of the ridge than farther away. Finally, | we decided on an unsheltered, level ice area, pitched the tent and built a snow wall to windward to break the force of the gale. The ‘| event showed we probably owed our lives to Ole’s having noticed | the tiny ice crack and so prevented our camping in the lee of the | ridge. The gale proved to be the worst I have ever seen at sea.* Al- | though the windbreak was built so high that only the top of the tent | projected above it, the flapping of the Burberry was so loud and _\ the hum of the breaking ice so continuous, that when in the even- Ing Storkerson went out to stand watch we in the tent were unable , to hear him though he shouted his loudest. When he came in again ' }to know why his shouts had not been answered I decided that | there was no point in standing guard and we all lay down and tried to sleep. We knew well that the ice was breaking up around us and we *The support party, according to McConnell’s diary, were compelled to | \eamp by this same gale. “Sleet alternated with snow, and soon the dogs __ {Were covered with ice,” writes McConnell; “as for ourselves, our parkas soon ' \became suits of icy mail.” 168 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC knew what the process was like. Here and there the six-foot ice was separating into pieces. A ridge of these pieces might be marching towards us, with a movement which all of us could picture clearly, but which is best described fer those who have not seen it by the analogy of a few pounds of domino sugar dumped on a table and then moved by pushing the whole heap slowly with the hand. If you were to remember the height of each domino of sugar in comparison with a bread crumb, you would realize the size of the ice cakes in comparison with our tent and ourselves, and you could gather what would take place in the path of that moving ridge. It does sometimes happen that a piece of ice as high as fifty feet rises during the course of ten minutes until it stands perpendicular; a moment later, when pushed just beyond the perpendicular, it breaks near the water line and falls over. If such a cake had top- pled upon our tent, we would have been crushed like flies between two boards. A realization of it kept us awake into the night. But more clearly than the danger of lying quietly in the tent we realized the greater danger of trying to do anything. To have gone outside and groped about in the impenetrable darkness, where the snow was flying so thick that one’s eyes could be opened only to be filled with it, would have been to walk into trouble rather than out. We had picked in the evening what looked to us like the safest spot and sensibly chose to abide by that decision. We wished the poets and magazinists who write about “The eternal silence of the Frozen North” might have been with us in the bedlam of that night. It cannot be properly said that we heard the noise of the breaking ice. We knew it would have been a roar if only the shrieking of the gale and the flapping of the tent could have been stilled a moment, and we felt it, by the almost continuous shivering of our ice floor and the occasional jar from the toppling cakes. But one gets used to danger and one gets tired of staying seared, and before one o’clock all of us were asleep, though perhaps not soundly. About five in the morning the gale had lessened enough for me to be awakened by a dog’s howling, which would have been inaudible an hour or two earlier. Storkerson, going outside, was able to see a distance of ten or fifteen yards. The trouble with the dog was that he had been tied in such a way that he was about to be dragged by the rope into the water of a crack that was slowly opening. Storkerson untied him and came in to tell us that a pres- sure-ridge about fifteen feet high had formed twenty-five feet from — the back of our tent. I found later that this ridge was, as was natural, composed of huge cakes of ice, the fall of any one of which | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 169 upon the tent would have brought our careers to an abrupt ending. The tracks of a bear in the snow showed that a large male had come in the blizzard within fifteen feet of us and within five feet of the dogs. We certainly knew nothing of his visit; it is probable that the dogs knew nothing of it, either, and it is not certain that the bear realized our proximity. A striking proof of the degree to which the ice had telescoped during the night was in a bear trail which we had crossed about a mile before camping and which now was only about three hundred yards away. CHAPTER XVII COLDER WEATHER AND BETTER PROGRESS NE effect of the gale of April 9th was that the ice which be- (Dic had been comparatively level was now a chaos of ridges. But the snow which had been falling for several days and was soft and deep when the gale commenced, was now beaten so hard that our feet left little impression. This was an advantage nearly compensating for the roughness of the ice. But a blessing beyond price was the clearing of the air and the beginning of a period of cold weather and northwesterly light airs which was destined to last for about two weeks. Instead of nondescript weather of ten or twenty above zero, we now had propitious cold of fifteen to thirty degrees below. Ice motion was a natural tendency for a day or two after the gale, but by the 11th the firm frost had bound the floes together. On April 11th we made thirteen miles and for several days a little better mileage each day; for the cold weather held and the ice grew smoother as we went farther from shore until at a distance of over a hundred miles we began to make twenty or twenty-five miles per day. On April 13th and 14th we crossed huge floes of glare ice. As this was evidently ice of the present year and as no new salty ice is ever glare, these floes must have been formed in the fresh water off the mouth of the Mackenzie River, and broken loose and drifted a hundred miles to the northwest. Although the ice was in the main frozen solid, we found open water every ten or fifteen miles. The leads were commonly running east and west and were of uneven width. Frequently they were as much as half a mile wide at the point where we struck them, but by following them a mile or two in one direction or the other we usually came to a place where a peninsula out from our floe met a similar one from the opposite floe and thus gave a chance to cross. We took soundings in most of these leads but were never able to get bottom with the amount of wire we had, so we are able to say only that the depth was in excess of 4,500 feet (1,386 meters). We had had more wire than this when we left shore, but we had been break- ing and losing it at the various soundings. 170 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 171 In outfitting our expedition we had sought advice from many authorities in oceanography as to the desirable sort of sounding wire, and this advice ranged all the way from the people who lay ocean cables and favor single strand piano wire, to that of Dr. W. S. Bruce of the Scottish Oceanographical Laboratory, who ad- vised 9-strand braided copper wire. I had followed the advice of Dr. Bruce and provided the expedition with a large amount of 9-strand wire, and I had also taken the advice of the cable com- panies and bought a considerable amount of piano wire. But most of the soundings were to have been done by the Karluk and the ex- ploratory parties outfitted from her, so she had carried all the braided wire and this was now lost. As fortune would have it, Mr. Leffingwell at Flaxman Island had been able to give me 911 meters of braided wire. At Collinson Point we had got piano wire which proved so worthless that whenever we sounded with it we lost the lead and a piece of the wire. The bottom of the deep sea is covered with a sticky ooze into which the lead sinks, so that a considera’.le strain must be put upon the wire to release it after sounding. We had carried six sounding leads at the start, but by April 15th we had only two leads left, one of six pounds and another of twelve, and had lost several miles of piano wire. We are therefore able to add our testimony to the experience of Dr. Bruce that any one who expects to sound repeatedly with the same wire will do well to use the strongest. We used for five years and for several hundred sound- ings the braided wire secured from Mr. Leffingwell without once los- ing a lead or sustaining an accident. Whether we were destined to find seals in the deep water off- shore with the weight of all polar authority against it and the opin- ion of the Alaska whalers and the coast Eskimos equally against it, had always been the question in Alaska. Now it was natural that we should watch closely for signs of seals. Here it stood us in good | stead that we had for years been in the habit of doing our own hunt- | ing. A man inexperienced in woodcraft may walk through a forest -| without seeing any signs of the presence of moose, though these _} signs will be patent to the hunter or guide who knows the woods and _ | the ways of animals. So a man who does not realize the presence of _} seals unless he sees their heads bobbing about in the water of an retain his original conviction that food animals are absent. But | there may be on the sea ice inconspicuous signs of seals as clear in ‘| their meaning when once noted as bear tracks in the snow. Ice formed this year is easily distinguished from ice that is two 172 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC or more years old. Seals are seldom found under ice more than a year old. Of this year’s ice much has been crushed into ridges where no seal can live, but here and there are level patches, partly covered with snow, but with the surface visible in rare spots where the wind has blown the snow away. If in a day’s journey you keep your eyes carefully on every patch you pass, you will, if there are seals in the region, see now and then a scar on the ice. The previ- ous autumn when this young ice first formed and while it was still mushy, a seal has shoved its head up through to breathe. In doing this he has made not only a hole six to ten inches in diameter, but has come up so suddenly that he has scattered fragments of two or three-inch ice for a foot or two around the hole. Months after- wards the outlines of the hole can still be faintly seen, but more easily discernible are the little pieces of ice in an irregular circle around it. Food was still in our sled and our main concern was speed. We never had much time to stop at a lead to watch for seals, and when we did stop we never saw any. But every day or two we saw one or more of these scars in the ice, showing that the seals had been there the previous September or October, and if seals were there in September we felt certain they would still’ be there in April. And so we pushed ahead with increased confidence in a theory the logic of which had seemed to me conclusive from the beginning. On April 15, 1914, I built the first snowhouse I ever tried to build myself, although as far back as 1907 I described in Harper’s Magazine just how it could and should be done. A midwinter jour- ney through the Mackenzie delta (1906-7) had provided opportu- nity for me to see and assist for the first time at the building of a snowhouse. The assistance happened to be confined to carrying the blocks from where they had been cut to where the house was being built, but I was free to observe and analyze every process that went | to the making of the finished house. The principles appeared so simple that, in spite of having read in various arctic books that their construction is a racial gift with the Eskimos and a mystery in- soluble to white men, I never from that moment had any doubt | that I could build a snowhouse whenever I should want to. On my | expedition of 1908-12 we often used snowhouses but only in the | Coronation Gulf district, where they were always built for us by } the hospitable Copper Eskimos, who never allowed a visitor at their own camps to lift a hand to the building of his own house. Apart from that one year my companions on my second expe- dition had been exclusively Alaskan Eskimos. These people had THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 173 never known how to build snowhouses in their own country. When they came east from Alaska into Canada they came as passengers with whaling ships, and from the whalers or from their own tradi- tions they had a prejudice both against the eastern Eskimos and against the snowhouse, which is their characteristic habitation in winter. As a result I have never known but one Eskimo from Alaska who, while residing in the Mackenzie district, learned to build snowhouses. And in spite of the undoubted comfort of these dwellings they have now gone thoroughly out of fashion in the Mackenzie district, so that it is only the clder men who were mature before the coming of the whalers in 1889 who are expert at building them. The winter of 1917-18 I built a snowhouse at Herschel Island at the instance of my friend, Inspector Phillips, of the Royal Northwest Mounted Police, who, although he had been stationed at Herschel Island for several! years, had never seen one. The curious thing was that the Herschel Island Eskimos gathered about to watch with rather more interest than the white men of the place. The younger Eskimos came because they had not before seen a snowhouse built; the older ones because it struck them as extraordinary not only that a white man should know how to build a snowhouse at all, but that he should demean himself by using so unfashionable a dwelling. The reason no snowhouses had been built on our ice journey before April 15th was the warm weather of which we have com- plained. Then when the cold weather came we were eager to travel every moment, and the pitching of a tent is undeniably quicker than the building of a snowhouse, especially when the men are inex- perienced. But on the evening of the 14th I had a slight touch of snow-blindness, and that night a lead obligingly opened just | ahead of our camp, giving an additional reason for not traveling | the next day. This provided the long-wanted opportunity for | putting my snowhouse-building theories into practice, and in three hours we built a dwelling nine feet in diameter and six feet high, inside measure. It was as well built as any of the hundreds I have built since, with this difference, that the three of us could now put up a house the same size in about forty-five minutes. As a preliminary to the building of a house we find a snowbank _| that is of the right depth and consistency. With our soft deerskin | boots we walk around on the drift, and if we see faint imprints of _our feet but nowhere break through, we assume provisionally that _ | the drift is a suitable one, but examine it further by probing with : rod similar to a very slender cane. When the right bank has | 174 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC been found we get out our sixteen-inch butcher knives or twenty- inch machetes and cut the snow into domino-shaped blocks about four inches thick, fifteen to twenty inches wide and twenty to thirty-five inches long. These blocks, according to their size and the density of the snow, will weigh from fifty to a hundred pounds, and must be strong enough to stand not only their own weight when propped up on edge or carried around, but if they are intended for the lower tiers of the house, must be capable of supporting the weight of three to five hundred pounds of other blocks resting upon them. The house itself is built preferably on a level part of the drift where the snow is three or more feet deep. The first block is set on edge as a domino might be on a table, but with your knife you slightly undercut the inner edge so as to make the block lean in- ward at a very slight angle if the house is to be a big one, or at a considerable angle if it is to be a small one. If, to use the lan- guage of physics, you want to lean the block over enough to bring the line of the center of gravity outside the base, this can be done by putting up a second block at the same time and propping one against the other. But this is never done in actual practice, for a house so small as to necessitate it would be too small for human habitation. The oval or circle that is to be the ground plan may be deter- mined by eye as the builder sets up the blocks one after the other; but in practice I make an outline with a string with pegs at either end, one peg planted where the center of the house is to be and the other used to describe the circumference, somewhat as a school- boy may use two pencils and a string to make a circle on a piece of paper. I find that even the best of snowhouse builders, Eskimo or white, if they rely on the eye alone, will now and then err in the size of the house, making it uncomfortably small or unneces- sarily large for the intended number of occupants. But with a string a simple mathematical calculation always tells how many feet of radius will accommodate the intended number of lodgers. It will be seen by the photographs that when you once have your first block standing on edge, it is a simple matter to prop all the other blocks up by leaning one against the other. The nature of snow is such that when a block has been standing on a snowbank or leaning on another block for five or ten minutes in frosty weather, it is cemented to the other blocks and to the snow below at all points of contact and can be moved only by exerting force enough to break it. ‘Udy, GNOOGY FHL JO DNINNIDUG HH, “fF ‘ALWIdWOQ UAL, LSU Ay, *e ‘aay NO LAG ST MOOIg ISU AH], ‘Z ‘LAO aay SMOOIG FHT, ‘T ‘LHDIN FHL yod AGvaY AdWVO AHY, ‘8 ‘Moolg LSV] HHY, “2 ‘AOOyy HAT, “9 ‘UGLy, GUIHT, GA, “¢ THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 175 When the first tier has been completed the second can be begun in any of several ways. The simplest is to select any point in the circle formed by your first tier, and from the top edge of one of the blocks make a diagonal cut downward to the bottom edge of the far corner of the same block, or of the second or third block. In the niche thus formed you place the first block of the second tier, its end abutting on the last block of the ground tier. After that you lean the second block of the second tier against the first block of the second tier, and so on, building up spirally. The blocks of each tier must be inclined inward at a greater angle than those of the tier below and at a less angle than those of the tier above. In other words, what you are trying to do is to build an-approxi- mately perfect dome. By the simple experiment of propping two books of the same size against each other on a table, it will be found that they cannot fall unless they slide past each other where they meet at the cor- ners, or slip on the table. But snow is so sticky that these blocks do not slip, and we cut the corners in such a way that they meet with even faces and do not tend to slide past each other any more than do blocks in a masonry dome. Building with snow blocks is far simpler than building with masonry, for stone is an intractable substance and has to be shaped according to a mathematical calcu- lation or moulded in an exact form before it is put in its intended position; but snow being a most tractable substance, such fore- | thought becomes unnecessary. We place the block in its approxi- mate position in the wall and then lean it gradually against the block that next preceded it, and, by the method of trial and error, continually snip off piece after piece until the block settles com- | fortably into the position where it belongs. A glance at the photo- _| graphs, especially the ones illustrating the latter steps in the build- ing, shows that the blocks cannot possibly fall unless they first | break. It becomes evident that with photographs and a description and possibly, for surety’s sake, a diagram or two in addition, the building of snowhouses could be taught by correspondence to boys in any place on earth where the winters are cold enough and the winds strong enough to form hard snowdrifts that last for several days or weeks. It is therefore curious that the building of snow- houses has until just lately been considered a sort of mystery. Antarctic explorers, like Shackleton, have realized the superior comfort of the snowhouse but have used tents, explaining the ap- parent inconsistency by saying, “There are no Eskimos in the 176 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Antarctic whom we could hire, as did Peary, to make snowhouses for us.” Sir Leopold McClintock was one of the first, if not the first, of polar explorers to point out that snowhouses are so com- fortable that their use would make arctic exploration a simpler, safer and pleasanter occupation; but he went on to say that unfor- tunately white men cannot make them, and that he himself did the next best thing by erecting vertical walls of snow and roofing them over with a tarpaulin. He comments on the inferiority of this dwelling to the real snowhouses, but insists that it is greatly superior to the regulation tent. While it is odd that McClintock should be so far behind the Eskimos with whom he associated, in that he could not build the houses which they built with ease, it is also notable that so far as white men were concerned, he was a generation ahead of his time in realizing their value. Any one who tries it will agree with him that snow walls with a tarpaulin roof make a much better camp than the silk tents used by most explorers down to the present time. Following the idea that while snowhouses are excellent camps they are a sort of racial property of the Eskimos, Charles Francis Hall was comfortable in them as a guest of the Eskimos but never learned how to build one. The like was true of Schwatka and Gilder and later of Hanbury. Peary used them for years as built for him by the Eskimos, but it does not appear to have occurred to him to learn to build one. So it was curiously reserved for us to be the first explorers to build our own snowhouses for field use.* We have found by experience that an ordinarily adaptable man | can learn snowhouse-building in a day. If four men codperate in the building of a snowhouse, one usually cuts the blocks, a second carries them, a third is inside build- | ing, and the fourth follows the builder around and chinks in all the | crevices between the blocks with soft snow. In ten minutes the soft snow in the crevices has become harder than the blocks them- | selves, so that the house, although fragile in process, is moderately © strong within half an hour. When the snow dome has been otherwise finished, a tunnel is | dug through the drift into the house, giving a sort of trap door entrance through the floor. Most Eskimos, failing to understand | certain principles of thermodynamics, use a door in the side of the *So far as I know, the first explorer who took steps to have his men learn |) snowhouse building was Amundsen at King William Island. Two of his men |} took lessons one or two days, but the expedition does not seem later to have made use of whatever skill they acquired. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 177 house. But it is obvious that if a door in the wall is open and if the interior of the house is being artificially heated, then warm air being lighter than cold, there will be a continual current of heated air going out through the upper half of the doorway, and a cold current from outside entering along the floor. If the door is on a level with the floor or a little below it, the warm air from the house cannot go out through the door, even with the door open, because warm air has no inclination except that of rising. Similarly cold air cannot come in through the door in the floor so long as the house above is filled with warmer air, for two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time. It is accordingly never necessary to close a door the top of which is on a level with the floor of the house or lower, and we leave our doors always open. In heating the house, whether by blue-flame kerosene stove, seal-oil lamp, or the bodies and breathing of people, poisons accumulate and venti- lation becomes necessary. So we have a ventilating hole in the roof, depending in diameter on conditions of external temperature, abundance of fuel and on whether people are awake or asleep. The cold fresh air from outside then wells up from the door below into the house as fast as and no faster than is necessary to replace the hot air passing out of the ventilator at the top. When the tunnel and door have been excavated, the bedding is passed into the house, and a layer of deerskins with the hair down is spread to cover the entire floor except just where the cooking is to be done. Over this layer we spread another layer of skins with | the hair up. The reason for the double insulation is that the | interior of the house is going to be warmer presently and people are going to sit around on the floor and later are going to sleep } on it, and if the insulation were not practically perfect, the heat | from the cooking and from the bodies of the sleepers would pene- trate through the bedding to the snow underneath, and by melting | it would make the bedclothes wet. When the temperature of the | weather outside, and consequently of the snow inside, is zero Fah- renheit or lower, a double layer of deerskins will prevent any thaw- | ing underneath the bed, the snow there remaining as dry as sand | in a desert. . When the floor has been covered and the bedding, cooking gear, | writing materials and other things brought in, a fire is lighted. | The end to be gained if fuel is abundant is to heat the house until _| the snow in roof and walls begins to thaw. If the fuel allows it we } sometimes bring the temperature temporarily as high as eighty _; degrees Fahrenheit, and then keep feeling of roof and walls to 178 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC watch the progress of thawing. This, of course, is most rapid in the roof as the hot air accumulates against it, and usually the lowest tier of blocks near the floor does not thaw at all. Thawing pro- ceeds without dripping, because dry snow is the best sort of blotter and soaks the water into itself as fast as it forms. When the inner layer of the roof has become properly wet with the thawing and the walls damp to a less degree, we either put out the fire or make a large hole in the roof, or both, and allow the house to freeze. This glazes it on the inside with a film of ice, giving it far greater strength, with the further advantage that if you rub against the glazed surface scarcely anything will adhere to your clothing, while from the dry snow before the glazing takes place you would get your shoulder white, with a good deal of snow perhaps falling on the bed. Now the house is so strong that without taking special care any number of men could climb on top of it. Polar bears may and occasionally do walk over these houses and I have never known of one breaking. Their strength, however, is somewhat the same as the strength of an eggshell, and while they are difficult to crush with pressure, they are easy to break with a blow. A polar bear has no trouble in getting in if he wants to, for one sweep of his paw will scratch a great hole. If the house was built at fifty below zero, each block in the wall was of that temperature and contained what we may unscientifi- cally speak of as a great deal of “latent cold.” To neutralize this it is necessary to keep a temperature of about sixty degrees Fahren- heit for a considerable time. Snow is so nearly a non-conductor of heat that when the “latent cold” has once been neutralized, the heat of our bodies keeps the temperature well above the freezing point even with the hole in the roof open for ventilation. But if the weather gets a little warmer than when we made camp, our body heat. may be too great or the cooking may raise the tem- perature high, and the roof will begin to melt. This we take not so much as a sign that the house is too warm as that the roof is too thick, so we send a man out with a knife to shave it thinner, perhaps from four down to two inches, giving the cold from outside a chance to penetrate and neutralize the heat from within, stopping the thawing. It may happen the next day that the weather turns colder again, and in that case hoar frost begins to form on the roof and drops in the form of snowflakes on the bed. That is a sign that the roof is now too thin and a man goes out with a shovel and piles on enough soft snow to blanket it. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC i () Two hours after building is begun the dogs have been unhar- nessed, each tied in his place and fed, everything outside has been made snug for the night, and every man is comfortably inside the snowhouse, eating a warm supper. With a feeling of security that in the early part of our sea exploration was based merely on con- fidence in our theories but later came to rest on experience as well, we customarily sat after supper burning merrily the kerosene or seal oil, firm in the faith that to-morrow would provide fuel no less than food. This explains any seeming inconsistency between our accounts of warmth and well-being and the stories of others who, like us, have used snowhouses but have found them cold and com- fortless. They were on fuel rations and we were not. It was the economizing of fuel rather than the severity of the climate or the inadequacy of the housing that kept them cold. In many a well- appointed house in our civilized lands people have shivered in the | last few years because they were on an allowance of fuel. It may well upset traditional ideas of the Arctic and of exploration to realize that when Europeans and Americans in the winter of 1917-18 \were wrapped in rugs before a coal-less grate or by a chilled radiator, our men were sitting in their shirt sleeves, warm and comfortable, }in snowhouses built on the floating ice of the polar sea. | I am in the habit of repeating and most of my companions jagree that hardships are not necessarily involved in the work of \the arctic explorer. On the sea ice, of course, there is the possi- jbility that the cake on which you stand may break up. It is jalso true that most of us prefer other food to seal meat, but all lof us who have spent more than a year “living off the country” jare quite of the Eskimo opinion that there is no food anywhere \better than caribou meat; and if you have any experience in the life of a hunter you will realize that in the winter when we are jhunting on some such land as Banks Island and when we sit in \these warm houses, feasting with keen appetites on unlimited quan- [ities of boiled caribou ribs, we have all the creature comforts. What we lack, if we feel any lack at all, will be the presence of ‘\friends far away, or the chance to hear good music. At any rate, t is true that to-day in the movie-infested city I long for more snowhouse evenings after caribou hunts as I never in the North onged for clubs or concerts or orange groves. And this is not eculiar to myself. The men who have hunted with me are nearly ill of the same mind. They are either in the North now, on the way back there by whaling ship, or eating their hearts out because hey cannot go. 180 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC It is not possible to give to the wonderful dogs too much credit for any success on this journey. The day of April 17th, for in- stance, they were still hauling over two hundred pounds each. The snow was firm but rough, and the sled was continually going up and down over hard drifts. There were also pressure-ridges to cross, though none bad enough to necessitate the pickaxe. It is true that the dogs alone could not have taken the sled over some of the ridges, but it was only there that the men did the least bit to help. The rest of the time they were running beside the sled, commonly with hands resting on it, and I was running ahead. We made that day an average of nearly four miles an hour, which meant a speed of over five miles on the level stretches. Although the dogs themselves were excellent, part of this superi- ority was due to the harnessing. When dogs are harnessed fan- wise as they are in Greenland and as they have been by many explorers, it is only, as I have said, the dog in the middle of the team that can pull straight ahead; the others pull at considerable angles with the course of travel, so that a part of their force is lost. This in some measure explains why it is that few explorers have been able to haul more than a hundred pounds to the dog, which is less than half of what ours hauled. But I believe the main supe- riority was in the breed. In eleven years of experience in the Arctic I have used dogs of all sorts. Some were brought from Greenland by Amundsen on his Gjoa voyage of 1904-06 and left by him near the Mackenzie delta, where I used them. We have also at different times had a hundred or more Eskimo dogs from the district around Victoria Island, where this dog is presumably as pure as he is anywhere in the world, for there the people and consequently the dogs have been least in touch with the outside world. We have also used several hundred dogs of mixed Eskimo descent from the Mackenzie district and the north coast of Alaska, where the dogs as well as the Es- kimos themselves have been subject to outside contact for from thirty to a hundred years. We have had a few Siberian dogs and about fifty of the type most favored for driving by the miners around Nome, Alaska. On the basis of our experience with all these va- rieties we have come to a conclusion on the whole very unfavor- able to the.Eskimo dog. For one thing, the Eskimo dog is too small. Those we have had ran in weight from fifty to seventy pounds, and to haul such @ load as our six dogs were carrying would need at least nine of the best Eskimo dogs. The disadvantage of having nine dogs as against THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 181 six is plain. There is the trouble of harnessing three more in the morning and of unharnessing, tying and feeding them in the evening. True, a bigger dog needs a little more food, but six dogs weighing 120 pounds each will do well on less food than is necessary for nine dogs averaging 70 pounds. Incidentally I will point out here that much dissatisfaction with big dogs when used among smaller dogs rises from the fact that they are given a standard ration, each one getting a pound or a pound and a quarter of food. If this goes on for days or weeks, eventually the seventy-pound dog will be in full strength when the bigger dog has become weak from star- vation. Any intelligent white man can see why a big dog needs more food than a small one and can appreciate how he is going to get full value for the extra food. But every Eskimo with whom I have discussed the matter says that just as small men eat as much as big men, so small dogs should have as much food as big dogs, and Eskimo opinion is almost universally against the big dog, since he will not keep fat on a ration that suffices a small one. An- other great advantage of the big dog is that when after several months on sea ice we eventually land on some island, we have to cache our sleds and continue with pack dogs. Here I have found that size is of special importance. Not only will the bigger dog carry a heavier load, but he carries it higher above the ground. A small dog will drag his pack through water when a bigger dog | carries it high and dry. Our big dogs have not been of any one breed. Some have been ) half Eskimo and half St. Bernard; others have been half mastiff, and some appear to have a considerable admixture of wolf. Just as with men, the excellence of dogs is largely a matter of tempera- ment. Here, next to his size, lies our grievance against the Eskimo | dog. When he is fat and well cared for he works with a great deal | of spirit, a sort of boyish exuberance. But as the boy has not the |stamina of the man and wants to rest when he gets tired, so the | Eskimo dog stops pulling when he feels like it. The white man’s | dog, in many cases at least, has character, or what corresponds to jit. He seems to have a sense of duty, and especially if he is well | treated will continue working hard though his stomach be empty jand his legs tired. When the Eskimo dog is tired you will have to resort to the whip. This to me is always disagreeable. It is »jalso my experience that you can no more get the best work out of ja dog team by whipping them than a slave owner could get the ‘jbest service out of enslaved men by inhumane treatment. I have | ‘seldom seen an Eskimo dog that will pull well the second day with- 182 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC out food, but I have seen half-breed St. Bernards who would pull, perhaps not with the same strength, for that would be impossible, but with the same willingness day after day while their strength lasted. In our last five years’ work we never lost a dog from hunger, and some of our dogs were never without food long enough to affect their willingness to work. The Eskimo dogs that had to meet the trial proved mostly quitters and needed a whip the second foodless day. The Eskimo dog has one advantage in the soundness of his feet, and another in his good fur. Certain kinds of white men’s dogs have even better fur, but I know none that have feet as sound, or at least as little affected by adverse polar conditions. It is in this soundness of the feet that half Eskimo blood gives the chief advantage above the pure bred St. Bernard, whose fur also needs improvement. One of the most spectacular ice crushes of our experience hap- pened in our path on April 18th. A floe to the north was moving east with reference to ours at the rate of about twenty feet per minute. There was such force behind the two floes that although the ice was over six feet thick, their relative speed seemed undimin- ished even by their grinding against each other with a force that piled up a huge ridge. The ice buckled and bent for several hun- dred yards, but the ridge was on one side of us, and we were con- veniently able to retreat. The toppling ice cakes sounded at half a mile like a cannonade heard over a stormy surf on a rockbound coast. The surf-like noise was the actual grinding of the edges where the ice was being powdered rather than broken. There was, too, a high-pitched screeching, like the noise of a siren, when a tongue of six-foot ice from one floe was forced over the surface of the other. The pressure ceased in about two hours, when we crossed the newly-formed ridge and proceeded on our way. All this time we had been traveling in a direction a little west of north. But frequent observations for longitude showed that our course was a little east of north, which had to be accounted for by the eastward motion of the whole surface of the sea. By the 20th we were entering a region of less and less game. We saw only about one polar bear track every twenty miles, and these tracks were mostly a month or two old. The scars on the ice show- ing the presence of seals the previous autumn became fewer, and we never saw any seals in the leads, although we occasionally THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 183 stopped to watch for them an hour at a time. This was discon- certing and gave us a good deal of concern. With the decrease in game signs there came back to our memories with increasing weight the statements of the Eskimos on shore that we would find no seals at a great distance from land, and the arguments by which our whaler friends had bolstered up these views originally borrowed from the Eskimos. There came to mind with increasing force the dicta of geographers and explorers summarized in encyclopedias and reiterated in every polar book, “the polar ocean without life.” I had answered their arguments readily enough on shore, but was our verbal logic to be disproved by the superior logic of events? My diary shows that our faith was at times shaken, though never badly enough for us to talk seriously of turning back. My companions were as eager as I to make a success of the journey, and what worried us more than scarcity of game signs was the implacable advance of the sun in the heavens. It was get- | ting perceptibly higher each day and there was no longer any dark- | ness at night. The temperature still kept mercifully well below | zero, but we knew it was only a question of days until the wind | would change to the east and the first thaw of spring be upon us. | Accordingly we said little of the danger of running out of food | and much of the necessity of hurrying on, but most frequent were | the remarks on our misfortune that we had not been able to start | the journey a month earlier. It is doubtless true that there is no | use crying over spilt milk, but it is equally true that there is noth- | ing more human than to do so. The scarcity of game signs would have troubled us less had we | had that understanding of the polar sea which we acquired during | the next five, years. We now know what we then but believed | upon reasoning with which the authorities disagreed, that the presence or absence of seals has nothing to do with latitude as such, but mainly with the mobility of the ice. In any region where | We have violent ice movement and consequently much open water, | we have a large number of seals. Food they can find everywhere |in the ocean but in certain places they lack the easy opportunity }to come up and breathe. During the summer they congregate in j/Tegions of open water, deserting those where the ice lies approxi- ‘mately unbroken. Then in the autumn when young ice forms they }make for themselves breathing holes which they use all winter. \If this young ice remains stationary the seal remains stationary with it. If it floats in any direction he travels along, for his life /depends upon his never going far from his breathing hole so long 184 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC as the ice around it remains unbroken. If it does break and if leads are formed he may do a certain amount of winter traveling, but this traveling ceases when the first hard frost forms new ice over the leads, which when open are the routes of travel. From the point of view of seal life there are in the polar ocean certain desert areas. They are caused by the sluggishness or ab- sence of currents, just as deserts on land are caused by lack of rainfall and porousness of the soil. And just as land deserts are restricted in area, so are the ocean deserts. The experienced over- land traveler crossing a new continent would know when he was entering a desert. It would then be a matter of judgment whether he was to turn back and give up his journey or whether he should attempt skirting the desert or making a dash across it. So it is when the ice traveler who depends on game for subsistence comes to one of these sea deserts. The signs are in the thickness and evident age of the ice, in the fewness of the leads and of other signs of motion, and in the absence of traces of seals on such patches of young ice as may be visible. Just as there are on land arid and semi-arid areas, so there are at sea regions of scarcity of seals and regions of their nearly complete absence. But just as on land a semi-arid belt with scant vegetation may be but the introduction to a real desert, so the area of scarce animal life into which we were entering might merge later into another of total barrenness. With summer imminent we all felt that speed was the main consideration, both for success and safety. Our loads were getting lighter as the supply of food grew smaller. But instead of restrict- ing our rations and tightening our belts we used to eat three full meals a day, and we fed the dogs almost to surfeit, with the idea that the more quickly the loads were lightened the greater our speed would be. We should really have thrown away one or two hundred pounds of food at the start, but we never had quite the strength of mind to do that. For one thing, the chocolate and malted milk were as yet more palatable to my companions than the less familiar seal meat. We pampered ourselves in disregard of good judgment and lightened the loads no faster than much feeding by men and dogs could do it. We were making a new departure in polar exploration, not only in intending to live by hunting when the food was gone but also in gormandizing while yet we had food. We were traveling over ice |) that floated over an unknown ocean, away from all known lands and without any intention of turning back soon. I think I have read nearly all north polar literature and I never read of any party THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 185 that under such circumstances would not have tightened their belts and saved every scrap of food. I said so exultantly to my com- panions and Storkerson helped me exult, for he had lived by hunting for years and had acquired the hunter’s temperament. But Ole had more misgivings than he owned up to. By April 23rd in latitude 75° 15’ N. we had entered an ice area of a new sort. Up to this time every visible lead had given evi- dence of much lateral motion; that is, the floe on one side had evidently been moving east or west with reference to the floe on the other side. But here we came to leads which had been opening and closing at intervals all winter without any lateral motion. There would be a belt of three or four-foot ice formed a little after Christmas; then might come a belt of fifteen or twenty-inch ice formed a month or so ago, and in the center of the lead five or eight-inch ice not more than a week old. A lead of three such belts evidently had opened only three times during the winter, but there were others which showed they had opened half a dozen times or more. But whether in four-foot ice or eighteen-inch ice, the break when the lead had opened had never been a straight line. Little projections and peninsulas on one side corresponded to inden- tations and bays on the other side, and when we found that, we knew the ice movement had been a simple opening where the sides of the crack had withdrawn straight away from each other without the lateral motion common inshore. In other words, this ice was either not drifting at all, or the areas on both sides of the leads were drifting in the same direction and at the same speed. For the present we had light northwest breezes and our sextant observations showed we were drifting each day a very little to | the east. But as we knew that Banks Island was to the east and | only a few hundred miles away, we believed this slight drift due to | nothing but the crushing and buckling of the ice against the Banks Island coast.* Up to April 25th we had been traveling daytimes and sleeping * We now believe that, for a reason unknown, there is an eddy in the Beaufort Sea. We know from observation that at certain seasons there is a westward movement of the ice along the north coast of Alaska. It carried the Karluk a thousand miles in four months, from Camden Bay, Alaska, to Wrangel Island. This westward current seems but the continuation of a southward current we have observed on every occasion west of Banks Island and Prince Patrick Island. We suppose there is a corresponding eastward ‘current offshore north of Alaska. Three hundred miles or more north of | Alaska the current is east, we think, bending south at Prince Patrick Island ae pest when it comes near the mainland. A glance at the map will make s clear. ~ et ota it itr : —— ee 186 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC at night, but on this date we changed to night travel. The season was too late for snowhouses and the light at night was sufficient for traveling. Although my diary contains almost every day some expression of thankfulness that the cold weather and westerly winds were continuing, the temperature at noon had become such that snow was melting on any dark surface, though it might be below zero in the shade. We could now take solid comfort in our day- time camps, for the tents which kept the wind off let the bright sunshine through and heated the imterior—even, once or twice, to an undesirable warmth. And we no longer had to take pains to keep our clothing dry, for by camping in the morning we could hang damp garments in the sun and get them dried before evening. | | | | | | | CHAPTER XVIII WE BURN THE LAST BRIDGE BEHIND US HE distance covered April 25th was twenty-four miles, a good day with a bad ending, for towards camping time the wind made the dreaded shift to the east, with fog and a light fall of snow. This meant probably drifting west, so that if we desired to travel east we should meet leads of open water running north and south parallel to the distant coasts of Banks and Prince Patrick Islands, and making a landing on either of them more difficult. Now that the east wind was upon us the temperature rose, and the leads formed by the ice motion refused to freeze over. When the temperature is twenty or forty degrees below zero, as in Feb- ruary or March, the opening of a lead is not a serious matter. It may stop you one day, but the next it has been bridged and you can cross it if it happens to lie athwart your course. Occasionally luck is such that it lies almost in the direction you are going. In that case the ice traveler can have no better fortune than to meet with a lead. If he finds it already frozen over, it is as if he had come out of the woods upon a paved road, and if it is still open he knows that a little wait and a night’s encampment will convert it into a boulevard for fast and easy traveling next day. But at the end of April, even though the lead may be running in your direction and though it may be a week old and the ice six or ten inches thick, still, it is so soft and treacherous from the weakness of the frost that it does not form a safe road and a bridge of older ice must be found. A day with the east wind as well as our theoretical knowledge of ice conditions decided us at this point to alter our course. We were in the vicinity of north latitude 73° and west longitude 141°. With a week or two more of cold weather (or, as we used to say “Had we started two weeks earlier”) we could have kept on north for two degrees of latitude and then turned east for a landing on _ the southwest corner of Prince Patrick Island. But clearly the _ Season was too late for that. So we decided to take roughly a great _ circle course for Cape Alfred, on the northwest corner of Banks 187 188 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC Island. At the time of turning east we had on hand 147 pounds of man food and 74 pounds of dog food, which meant provisions for men for about fifteen days and for dogs for about ten days. Under date of April 26th I wrote under the caption “Plans” the longest diary entry of the whole trip. This was because we had come in a sense to a parting of the ways. We were two hundred miles from Alaska, we had provisions for two weeks only, and the signs of game were getting fewer every day. Without having ex- actly lost faith in the presence of seals in every part of the Arctic, my men were becoming a little dubious about it. We had been drifting before light northwesterly airs, but now we were encamped on a solid floe waiting to see the effect of the east wind. If it drifted us west with great rapidity I should have turned reluctantly towards Alaska, for a westward drift would mean a great deal of open water between us and Banks Island. On the other hand, should we not drift materially to the west we had in this a sign that the ice was fairly continuous from us to Banks Island where we might hope for a landing. The north coast of Alaska is known to be subject in spring to violent ice movement and the current is considered to be prevailingly westward. I thought then and still think that any attempt to land in May or June on the north coast of Alaska with a sledge party coming from the Beaufort Sea has the imminent hazard of being swept by the current west beyond Alaska into the ocean north of Bering Straits. When I am lost in a storm, or when I am in doubt of any kind, I frequently find that my feelings, or so-called “instincts,” are in conflict with deliberate reason, and I have invariably found that the “instincts” are unreliable. I may have the strongest feel- ing, which almost amounts to a conviction, that my camp lies in a certain direction, for example, when a careful review of circum- stances shows that it really ought to le in another. I confess that I now had similarly, in common with the men, the feeling that our safety lay in returning over the known route to Alaska, but all available facts indicated that such an attempt would be the most hazardous course. To the south lay known dangers but to the east we were in complete ignorance of conditions, and by ele- mentary reasoning the chances were at least even that the condi- tions towards Banks Island of which we knew nothing would be as good as the conditions to the south, which we knew to be bad. My companions were more strongly impressed with the dangers of the unknown. They pointed out that we knew that the sealing to the south was good, while it might easily be bad to the east. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 189 They said that were we to land on Alaska we should find a settled coast, but that in Banks Island we had an uninhabited country where game might be scarce; moreover, our ships were to the south, and were we to return to them we could sail north to Banks Island during the coming summer. Now as to sailing to Banks Island in ships, my objection was that we should be compelled by the ice to skirt the mainland coast part of the way, or at the best make a diagonal course from Herschel Island to Cape Kellett. In doing this we should be sailing through waters that have been sailed by whalers since 1889, while our ice journey along the great circle course to Cape Alfred would take us through territory unsailable and unknown. Exploration of unknown territory was of the high- est importance, and was the main duty assigned us by the Govern- ment. But all considerations were outweighed by the dangers of return to Alaska. I believe the chances are at least three in four that any party attempting this late in the month of May from a distance to seaward as great as ours would be swept to the west beyond Point Barrow. If they were on a solid ice floe they might survive the summer in the ocean east of Wrangel Island, but that also is an explored area and the summer would be wasted. If the floe were to get into the open in the vicinity of Point Hope, wave action might break it into fragments, with the probability if not certainty of a tragic ending. This view has been strengthened, so far as the year 1914 was concerned, by the fact that all whalers and Es- kimos on the north coast of Alaska have told me that that season proved an especially open one and that the inshore ice during the spring was in continual rapid westward motion. This indeed was one of the reasons why our death was so universally assumed among them. They did not conceive of the possibility of our having gone to Banks Island, but felt sure we would attempt a landing on the Alaska coast. Conditions there being exceedingly bad, it was be- lieved that we had either been lost in some hazardous traverse over ice made rotten by the spring thaws, or been drifted into the sea west of Barrow.* * This opinion was given added weight by Captain Pedersen, who upon his return to San Francisco gave out a newspaper interview in which, after complimentary references to our ability to live by hunting, he said that our only chance of survival was that we might in the following autumn or spring be able to make a landing on Wrangel Island, the New Siberian Islands, or some other part of northeastern Siberia. This opinion of an ice master | who knows more than any one else about sea conditions north of Alaska as encountered by whaling ships, became the chief reason why the eyes of those | friends who still had hope of our being alive were turned thousands of 190 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC It was a bit hard for me to persuade the men to continue towards Banks Island. Storkerson was used to living on meat, and that part of our future did not worry him, but this was not the case with Ole, who had the dread of a meat diet common to those who have not tried it. But when their minds were made up to take the risk they became wholly enthusiastic for the plan and energetic in carrying it out. This is a proper place for a tribute to those qualities which made my companions ideal comrades under difficult conditions, but as the qualities themselves appear constantly in this narrative I shall not attempt a tribute more direct, for it would be certain to fall short of my feelings and desires. For the first few days after turning towards Cape Alfred we found good level ice, and the leads all proved to have crossing places so that we were able to make from fifteen to twenty-five miles per day. The night between May 2nd and May 3rd we had the midnight sun for the first time. No more than a third of it went that night below the ice horizon. The first ten days of May were a period of anxiety. The sun was rising mercilessly higher and higher and we struggled towards Banks Island with the fear of summer upon us. Kerosene gave out May 5th, but we saw no seals in any of the leads and dared not wait and watch for them, for every hour was precious. When we wanted something to cook with, necessity invented it. As part of our bedding we carried two grizzly bear skins, and we had a pair of scissors. The long hair of the skins proved effective, though scarcely fragrant, and half a pelt was enough to cook the meals for a day. After a long period of gorging ourselves to lighten our loads, we now found the sled nearly empty and went on half rations for the only time on the whole expedition. This abstemiousness resulted from our unwillingness to stop and hunt, for we were now sure that the warm weather was going to make it difficult to reach Banks Island, and were even beginning to fear it might make a landing before next fall impossible. This, in turn, would result in our miss- ing the Star at the Norway Island rendezvous. The dogs were on miles farther west than the point at which my written word had said we would make our landing. It is interesting to me, though scarcely flattering, that I have found among hundreds of editorials and thousands of news stories from the daily papers, not one opinion to the effect that we should be found where I had said the North Star was to look for us. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 191 half rations, too, for the same dread of summer weather which pre- vented our stopping to hunt seals for ourselves prevented our hunt- ing seals for them. I find from reading my diary that this period was more anxious than I now realize. Our faith was really firm but, like some of the believers of old, we had an occasional hour of doubt. The theory was mine, so I felt more free than either of my companions to criticize it, and sometimes in the evening after a hard day’s march I wrote down that it was possible after all that Eskimos and whalers and polar explorers were right and that food might prove scarce on the Arctic ice. We were passing open lead after open lead without the sight of a seal; though I reminded myself that in some of the best sealing waters of northern Alaska I had spent days and often weeks watching beside open water without seeing a seal, and then one morning I would come down to the water to find a dozen swimming about within gunshot. I hoped and expected that it would prove so again whenever we should be forced at last to stop for hunting. Besides the advancing summer we had a second argument for traveling fast towards Banks Island. This was that Eskimos, whalers and explorers alike believed seals to be more common in the vicinity of land than in the deep waters far offshore. If this were true, the nearer we got to Banks Island the better the chances would be of getting food when provisions ran out. Perhaps as a result of being on short rations, I find several diary notes on the comparative excellence of various kinds of food. We had with us pemmican, bacon, butter, peameal, rice, chocolate, and malted milk. We found ourselves in agreement that four pounds per day of peameal and butter or peameal and bacon for the three of us was a more satisfactory diet than six pounds of pemmican and biscuits. For one thing, the standard explorers’ breakfast of pemmican, biscuit and tea predisposes to thirst. There is no difficulty in quenching thirst by eating snow once you have rid yourself of the curious superstition that snow-eating is danger- ous, but even at that it is preferable not to become thirsty. Unless it be religion, there is no field of human thought where ‘sentiment and prejudice take the place of sound knowledge and logical thinking so completely as in dietetics. It is therefore not surprising that actual experiments with diet, especially those insti- tuted by stern necessity, should yield results contrary to conven- tional expectations. I have never met any one inclined to believe that he would find suitable and in every way satisfactory as a diet 192 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC for a long period a thin stew or soup made from rice, butter, choco- late and malted milk boiled together. But a dozen men have now tried this diet on our ice trips and most of us prefer it to anything else we have tried. Some of my men, partly because they were sailors with acquired food tastes, have preferred peameal in place of rice. In point of theory peameal would undoubtedly be better than rice if the chocolate were absent, but so long as there is choco- late to supply the protein I prefer the rice; if for no other reason, because it is easy to cook. Many travelers have refrained from carrying rice in the belief that it was not easy to cook. True, the cook-books tell you some such thing as that you should boil rice for twenty minutes. This would surely be a waste of fuel for those who travel on fuel rations, although for ourselves we need not care. But we have found that if we put the rice into cold water and when the pot comes to a boil set it aside for a few minutes, the rice is thoroughly cooked before it cools enough for eating, and not more than one minute of actual boiling is needed. We used no more fuel in boiling a pot of rice than Peary used in making a pot of tea. On some trips we have carried things as difficult to cook properly as beans. Time for cooking them cannot be taken except on stormbound days, but on such occasions boiling them is a pastime. I am now of the opinion that the fewness of the seal signs at distances of two or three hundred miles from shore was due mainly to the hurry we were in. The level places where they might have been found happened only occasionally to be on our actual route, and as we never felt we could stop and look around, nothing could be noticed except what was actually in our way. How much is it. ; | explicable, then, that others may have failed entirely to notice seal signs because they have been possessed with the idea that there was no use looking for game signs when game was absent, or else that seals if present could not be secured? For well-known explor- ers, so far as I know, have not been experienced seal-hunters as Storkerson and I were, and seem to have been quite unfamiliar with the technique of seal hunting, even theoretically. On the evening of May 7th our faith in the presence of seals had confirmation. We had pitched camp on the shore of a lead about a mile wide, covered with young ice not strong enough to ~‘ bear a man. We had camped a little earlier than usual, and while | the men were cooking supper I sat for about an hour on top of a © high ice hummock, studying the lead with binoculars for several miles in both directions as though I had been on a hilltop near the THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 193 bank of a large river. The glasses showed roughnesses on the young ice, but from their distance I could not be sure that they had actually been made by seals coming up to breathe. I don’t know whether it was a sign of the weakness or the strength of my faith that when after an hour’s watching I saw the head of a seal come up through the ice about a mile away, I gave an involuntary shout that brought my companions out of the tent. A seal a mile away in mush ice is as safe from the hunter as if he were on the other side of the earth. Furthermore, we still had food for two or three days at half rations and we were really enjoying the experience of sailing close to the wind, although I do not think the same can be said of the dogs, lacking our point of view. All three of us might have taken our station beside the lead, to wait the possible reappearance of the seal close enough for kill- ing. I think Ole felt something like doing it, for he was always a great one for “playing safe’ and this was his first experience of “living off the land.” But Storkerson and I had acquired the typical Indian or Eskimo attitude. Instead of using every effort to get this first visible seal, we merely satisfied ourselves that he actually was a seal and that we were now in seal country, and then went back to the tent to feast our minds on anticipated seals and to indulge ourselves at one meal with half our remaining and for the last few days hoarded food. With about a day’s food actually on hand, we thanked our stars that the time of measuring it by other standards than our appetites was over, and assured | each other that we would never again be so skeptical of the bounties of the Arctic as to begin limiting our eating while we had a week’s store ahead. Those who have never undergone hunger expect death from it to result in a short time. Going without food for a few days consti- tutes in the imagination of some a great hardship—a curious belief _} to persist and be so nearly universal when the few people who have tried it for a considerable number of days tell us that little suffering is involved, unless it be mental. The prisoner who waits in a comfortable cell and has several good meals brought him each |day may undergo agonies if he has a sufficient imagination and | knows that the electric chair is only a few days off. So it may have been on occasion with polar explorers, that when their food }was gradually giving out they suffered mental anguish because of \the death which in their mind’s eye they saw coming upon them. _\Had they been of optimistic temperament, expecting deliverance in one form or another, their suffering as such would scarcely have 194 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC been worth the name, though they might have starved to the point of extreme weakness. Physical suffermg may well have accompa- nied the mental anguish in such cases as that of the Greely Expe- dition at Cape Sabine, for with them hunger was kept at a tanta- lized wakefulness for half a year by food enough to keep up appe- tite though it could not sustain strength. They knew each day they would not get enough and doubted—three out of four of them rightly—whether summer and the relief ship would find them alive. Simple starvation, that comes to death in a few weeks, any one should choose readily in preference to, for instance, cancer, which will carry off one in nine of our friends who have passed middle life. But no moral trial can have been harder, no death more cruel, than that of Greely’s men. In the light of the four bndenedinie years I still approve of the rejoicing of May 7th and the light-heartedness with which we then looked towards the future. Relying merely on memory, I should now be unable to realize that four days later a mental reaction had — set in and we were again in the depths of gloom. Summer with its adverse traveling conditions was making itself more and more felt. What we now feared was no immediate disaster but failure to make a landing on Banks Island so as to meet the Star at the appointed rendezvous. My diary entry for May 11th says some- thing of that kind: “The lead that stopped us yesterday closed during the night by the young ice fast to our floe coming in touch with the opposite ‘shore.’ Storkerson, who had this watch, did not consider the young ice a safe bridge for crossing and neither did Ole, who had- the watch from two o’clock to four-thirty. When he called me for my watch I at once investigated the young ice and found it rotten and treacherous but six inches thick, and so decided to take chances. We crossed safely at 6:10. Traveled about E. 10° N. 12 miles to 12:54 o’clock (A. M. May 11th) where we stopped to melt some snow for drinking. The ice crossed to-day was 75 per cent. of it one or more years old. There was much soft snow everywhere and the body of the sled frequently dragged in it—this is another of the many times we have missed the toboggan-bottomed sled which Wilkins took ashore. The going to-day was fairly level. Crossed three leads of four-inch young ice, rotten because of the warm weather—this is dangerous work, but we have been on short rations for a week—the dogs are living on our skin clothes—so it is up to us to take a few chances. I shall never again willingly (and I THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 195 can hardly be said to have done it willingly this time) be on the ice so late in the season. Had we been six days earlier we should have had frosty weather to Banks Island and should be there now. As it is, the issue seems doubtful, and Storkerson and Ole may prove right after all in thinking our enterprise dangerous. “After a rest and making some drinking water, we started again at 3:15 A. M. and camped at 7:15, as it was getting too warm for the dogs to pull well and the snow was melting on our clothing and making us wet. Distance traveled, about 18 miles east 110° N. “Yesterday we awoke to find the long siege of easterly wind over for the time. By 6 A. M. it was blowing from the northwest ten miles an hour, increasing by 8 A. M. to about northwest 15 miles. During the day the wind shifted to about west 10° south. In the evening thickly clouded in the southwest and some snow fell be- fore midnight. Sun barely visible most of the day and the light very trying on the eyes. About 3 A. M. we saw from northeast | to southeast what Storkerson and Ole think was a mirage of land. | It looked through my glasses like clouds undulating around oval- | topped mountains. Crossed two more leads over the same sort of | rotten and sloppy four-inch ice. In one case the ice bent so badly | under the sled that for a minute or two we expected it to break | through, which might have proved fatal to all of us, although to give a certain margin of safety I always carry my rifle over my shoulder and about fifty rounds of ammunition. The west wind is doing brave work for us, closing the leads partly though it is not strong enough yet to have closed any of them completely. There | is lateral motion discernible at all the leads. The floe west of each ‘|lead appears to be moving south about a foot in five minutes with \reference to the floe next east of it. The floes are also approaching each other and crumbling a little on the edges. I suppose the pres- “jsure is so mild because there is a great deal of open water between jus and Banks Island with nothing solid to obstruct the eastward motion of the ice.” I have quoted this entry in full, except for the meteorological jobservations, to show what sort of records I was in the habit of eeping. Many of the entries are a good deal more detailed, giv- “img information of the kind of ice, or mention of signs of game, ‘pink snow” and other botanical and zodlogical phenomena. Full ‘reproduction of such notes would be tedious in a book intended ‘or general reading, although it is really these that constitute the arger part of the scientific information gained. This detailed in- | 196 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC formation with the conclusions to be drawn from it is made part of a series of scientific reports on the work of the expedition pub- lished by the Canadian Government.* By May 138th we had fed to the dogs several pairs of worn-out skin boots, the two grizzly bear skins off which we had used the hair for fuel, and some other bedding. We ourselves were on a ration of three-quarters of a pound of food per day, at which rate there remained enough for two or three days only. It seemed to me that this was about as close to the wind as we ought to sail, so after traveling eleven miles that day we stopped beside open water to watch for seals. During the first two hours we saw several and killed two. This was encouraging so far as it went, although our hopes had a severe blow through the prompt sinking of both as soon as they had been shot. Here was another of my theories that might have gone wrong. It is familiar knowledge that in the vicinity of land seals killed in winter will in most cases float, while if killed in the spring they sink. Common belief among the Es- kimos and whalers was that they sink because in the spring the seals are not as fat as in winter. My view was that they sank probably because in the spring the rivers bring a large amount of fresh water to the ocean, thus reducing the salinity of the water near land. Everyone knows that eggs and potatoes will float in brine, and that in many of the salt lakes it is impossible for a bather to sink, while swimming in salt water is easier than in fresh. I had reasoned that, although seals when shot in the spring might sink near shore where the water was comparatively fresh, they would float if killed at distances remote from land where the water, at least up to the beginning of the summer thaws on the ice, would have the same degree of salinity in May as in February. The sinking of the first two seals killed was a bit disconcerting, although we explained it by recalling that a certain small percen- tage of seals will sink at any season. There is no denying that after this experience we had a troubled day. At none of several leads that we passed did we dare to risk stopping, for fear any seals killed might sink, leaving nothing to pay us for time lost in the hunting. The dogs had become noticeably thinner. Had they been Es- * For information regarding the scientific reports of the expedition, address Deputy Minister of Naval Service, Ottawa. Three octavo volumes are now ready. The entire series of reports will probably fill between twenty and Pn cceye volumes. It will doubtless be several years till the last volume is ready. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 197 kimo dogs all of them would have quit pulling or could have been driven only with the whip. But only one of these dogs was a quit- ter; the other five still pulled their best. The quitter was a little fatter than the others, for he had begun to save his strength as soon as he became hungry. No amount of whippimg would make him pull an ounce. In circumstances such as these the conventional attitude towards a dog is that he ought to be killed, but we knew that Bones, as we called him, because he was usually so fat that his ribs and even his backbone were difficult to feel, was a good dog when well fed and would be useful again when we killed a seal for food. I admit a little resentment towards him, especially when I saw how well the others pulled who were leaner; still, I could never see why feeling should take the place of judgment, nor why I should kill a dog because he lacked character. Bones did, as a matter of fact, live to serve us many years. But we were careful never to take him again on a trip where emergencies of short rations were likely to arise. A depressed evening followed a depressed day and my diary has here about the gloomiest entry of the volume. Under the heading of “Traveling Seasons,” I now read: “It is difficult and dangerous to be traveling out on the sea ice in this latitude of the Beaufort Sea after May first. If we should get strong easterly winds now, for instance, our chances of reaching Banks Island would be small, as the few seals here seem to sink and we are nearly out of food. It is a hard thing now to think back on the silly jealousies that made Storkerson’s work of preparing for this ice trip stand still for two weeks till I got home—I expected to find everything ready at Martin Point so we could leave for the ice while the midwinter frosts held instead of when spring was upon us as it had to be, after we had done the work of prepara- tion which Storkerson could easily have done earlier if he had had the proper assistance.” It is usually so when things go badly. One thinks back to the perversities of human nature which can, if one keeps that point of view, be seen as the source of all one’s evil for- tune. CHAPTER XIX WE SECURE OUR FIRST SEAL AY 15th it had come to a shown-down. The leads were get- M ting more numerous and we had great trouble in finding crossings. Evidences that the ice was drifting to the west were multiplying and it was certain that we could not get ashore in Banks Island until 2 westerly wind began to drive the ice east toward the land. When we came now to a lead we stopped and ~ made up our minds we would not move again until we had a seal. — During the first three or four hours two seals came up within two ~ hundred yards of me and I killed both. And they sank. Then followed an hour or two of waiting, at the end of which © one came up about two hundred and fifty yards from the hummock ~ where I was lying, although only a few yards from the edge of — the lead. The sun was behind me and the light just right. Here — the flat trajectory of a rifle that has a velocity of over 3,100 feet, — as mine had, has the great advantage that one does not have to | worry about estimating distances. Seals often show their shoulders — out of the water as far as the region of the heart, but when there is danger of their sinking a body wound is undesirable. My bullet ‘ | went through the brain, and the dead seal floated so high that I | could see instantly he was safe. Storkerson was watching and his — repeated shouts of “It floats!’ would have delighted the hearts of the manufacturers of a certain kind of soap. That evening the diary was as hopeful as it had been appre- hensive the day before. “It is lucky we wrote woe and foreboding | 3 in our diaries yesterday. There is nothing of the sort to-day to |’ write about. We are having the first full meal for over a week. No more equal divisions of small portions of food into rations.” As if for further encouragement we saw this day the first bear track in two weeks. A female with two cubs had been traveling south along one of the leads. For two or three days we had been | . seeing about one fox track per day, but for a week or two before that not more than one every three or four days. Our struggle to reach the land-fast ice of Banks Island was no less strenuous. — 198 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 199 The first relaxation was a day of rest deliberately taken to feed up the dogs and to celebrate with feasts of fresh boiled seal meat our vindicated theory. But the day deliberately taken was fol- lowed by two days of idleness enforced. On the feast day the sun was bright and warm, and instead of using our Burberry tent double as was our custom, we used only the outer cover so as to allow the sun to penetrate and warm up the interior. The Burberry in cold weather was perhaps not perfect but certainly the best tent that we know anything about. It was conical in shape but otherwise resembled an umbrella, in that five bamboo sticks corresponding to umbrella ribs were fastened at equal intervals to the tent cloth and joined at the top with hinges. These bamboo ribs were inside the outer cover and from them was suspended by strings an inner tent, also of Burberry cloth, giving an air space of an inch and a half or two inches between the cloths. This double tent when the temperature outdoors was at zero would be at least twenty degrees warmer inside than if we had used a single cover. As the difference in weight is only about four pounds, carrying a double tent is well worth while, especially as it has incidental advantages. Hoar frost will form on the inside of a single tent if the weather is near zero, and this not only makes the tent heavy but falls in the form of flakes upon the bedding at | night and tends to make it wet. With two covers, hoar frost will | not form on the inside one unless the temperature out of doors | is considerably below zero. If a little frost does form between | the tents this does little harm, for by beating the outside with a | stick ninety per cent. can be shaken out when the tent is pulled ) down. Two further advantages are that it can be pitched by | two or three men in a fraction of a minute, almost as quickly as an | umbrella can be opened, and that once pitched the bamboo ribs keep it from flapping as badly as other tents do, just as a ribbed umbrella is kept from flapping. It will also stand any arctic gale if properly pitched. The only time ours ever blew down was in | the gale that separated us from Wilkins and Castel, and that was "| because we had pitched it on a little patch of glare ice so that | it slid bodily before the wind. The day we rested we had used the single tent instead of the double, and the bright sunshine penetrated the one cloth so easily that during the day we became snowblind. This was something ‘no one of us had dreamed could happen. We had all had touches at various times of snowblindness acquired out of doors, but the thought never occurred to us that our eyes might be affected in 200 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC a tent. The attack was not severe, but it is true with snowblind- ness if it is true with anything that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. As soon as we realized what had happened we put up again the inner cover of the tent, spread some canvas over the outside to make it darker, and then put on our amber-colored glasses and sat or slept inside until our eyes were normal again. Through great care of my eyes I have never in ten winters spent north of the arctic circle become completely snowblind, though one of my eyes has been frequently affected. When one eye is better than the other, as is the case with most people, the poorer eye is the one affected. The glare of the snow appears brighter to the eye of keener vision, and that eye is instinctively closed or shielded. When you have once begun to shield one eye, it becomes increas- ingly difficult to keep it open, for the reason that an eye which has been in darkness is blinded by a light which does not blind an eye that has been continually exposed to it. The whole strain of seeing thus falls upon the weaker eye and it accordingly is at- tacked first. Those who become snowblind in both eyes simul- taneously have either used their will power to keep both eyes open or else have eyes of nearly equal quality. From this it might be inferred that snowblindness is most likely to occur on days of clear sky and bright sun. This is not the case. The days most dangerous are those when the clouds are thick enough to hide the sun but not heavy enough to produce what we call heavily overcast or gloomy weather. Then light is so evenly diffused that no shadows can be seen anywhere. The sea ice is not level; if there are no actual snags of broken ice sticking up, there are at least snowdrifts. When the sun is shining in a clear sky all these unevennesses are easily seen, because shadows lie in the low places, but on a day of diffused light everything looks level, as was observed in respect to travel under cloudy skies. You may collide against a snow-covered ice cake as high as your waistline and, far more easily, you may trip over snowdrifts a foot or so in height, because without the assistance of shadows every-— thing that is pure white seems to be perfectly level. Knowing the danger, your eyes are continually strainea for its detection. Here amber-colored glasses are of use, for unevennesses imperceptible to the bare eye can sometimes be seen by the aid of these “ray filters,” as they are called in photography. This is one of the advantages of the amber glass over all other forms of protection against snowblindness. Glass of “chlorophyll green” is excellent when the sun is shining, and seems to be easier on the eye than dark THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 201 or so-called “smoke glasses,” which are the poorest of all. Almost any color will do when the sun is out, but in cloudy weather both the chlorophyll green and the smoked glasses cut, out too much light and interfere so with clearness of vision that they are a distinct handicap as compared with the amber glass. When through the use of poor glasses or none at all your eyes are stricken, the symptoms do not develop at the time of exposure. It may be after a long day’s march that when you enter the tent or snowhouse in the evening your eyes feel as if there were small grains of sand in them. Such things as tobacco smoke or slight fumes from a poorly-trimmed lamp will make them water exces- sively. Gradually you begin to feel more sand in them and they become uncomfortable and sore, but it will be towards morning be- fore shooting pains begin. These pains resemble those of earache or toothache and are said by persons who have had severe cases to be the most intense they ever experienced. One feature of snowblindness is that each attack predisposes to another. People who have never been in snow countries are likely to remain immune and not suffer until the eyes have been exces- sively exposed, but people such as the Eskimos who are subject to the predisposing conditions every year are very readily affected. Some of them have a sort of fatalistic idea that snowblindess is inevitable and for that reason do not take enough precautions, al- though they nearly always take some precautions. I have known the severest cases of snowblindness chiefly among Eskimos. Men whom I have reason to consider as stoical as the ordinary lie moaning in bed with a skin or blanket over their heads, sleepless for as much as twenty-four hours. The period of considerable pain seldom extends over more than three days if one is in a dark- ened room or wears black or amber glasses. After complete recov- ery a second attack is not likely to come in less than a week, no matter how the eyes are exposed, but careless persons will have attacks every week or ten days.* Keeping the eye on some dark object is a valuable preventive. On some trips we have had only one pair of amber glasses which *T have read a novel where the plot hinges on two things: (1) that a snowblind person is temporarily stone blind; and (2) that when you have recovered from snowblindness you can still pretend to be snowblind. The first premise is ridiculous and the second untenable. A snowblind person is not blind in any such sense as is required by the plot of this novel. During severe snowblindness the tears flow as rapidly as in violent weeping. This condition is difficult to simulate when you are getting better. Further, in the movie made from the story no attempt is made by the snowblind actress to simulate tears while she is supposed to be pretending to be snowblind. 202 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC have been used by the man who goes ahead and picks trail, for he alone has to use his eyes continually upon the white surface. The men who walk at the sleds to prevent them from upsetting are able to keep their eyes on its dark cover or upon the dogs. Another preventive is the Eskimo type of wooden protectors. This may be of a variety of designs, but the essential feature is always the same. The light is admitted to the eye through a nar- row slit. The disadvantage is that you have only a limited field of vision—you cannot without stooping forward see what is imme- — diately at your feet. For picking trail you must keep your eyes well up, so as to see that portion of the road which is several yards in advance, and when you do this you are lable to stumble, not having within your field of vision the unevennesses closer at hand. These Eskimo goggles have the advantage over regular goggles or spectacles that glass, when it is kept near the eye, will hoarfrost from eye moisture and from the moisture of the face, especially if one perspires. This frosting is not a serious annoyance on a windy day, especially if one keeps the face sidewise to the wind, but on a calm, frosty day the glasses keep frosting continually and if one travels fast enough or works hard enough to perspire they cannot be worn at all. It has always been my plan to remain in camp when any one was snowblind, both because I realized the intense suffering of traveling under such conditions and because recovery is always quicker under proper care. But as we lost most of our amber glasses on the Karluk and never afterwards had enough to go around, we lost in five years several weeks of good traveling time through snowblindness. When we resumed travel on May 18th we saw seals in every | lead we passed. It almost seemed as if they had been keeping out of sight to worry us, for now they were as numerous as I have ever seen them in any waters. A minor misfortune to reckon with was Ole’s rather too cautious temperament. He was as optimistic as any one when there was real need, but now when seals were all about us and when I thought that with so many in one lead there were pretty sure to be some in the next, he would remind us how we had traveled for days with- out seeing seals and how we might get into another such district at any time. Whenever a seal appeared particularly close or in a position easy to approach, Ole used to say, “I think we’d better get that one and make sure of him.” We lost many an hour in killing and picking up a seal, and presently found ourselves THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 203 hauling a huge load almost as heavy as our load had been when the support party left us. Ole kept pointing out what a comfortable thing it was to know we had plenty, and volunteered to pull on the sled to help the team along. Surely if he who works has a right to eat, Ole had this right, for he was never lazy and seldom tired. Still, looking back now, we are all agreed that had it not been for Ole’s frequent “We’d better get that one and make sure of him,” we should have been able to make better progress. It is possible, doubtless, to have an excess of faith, but generally speaking he is the best ice traveler under our system who is the greatest optimist. Until the kerosene gave out cooking had been done in the tent, for our primus stove never gave any trouble. Afterwards for a few days we had cooked outside, burning grizzly bear or caribou hair in an improvised tin stove. When we began to kill seals we used for some days an Eskimo-style seal-oil lamp, improvised from a frying pan. But I was the only member of the party who was used to the management of this cooking apparatus, and the others had difficulty in keeping the wicks trimmed, with the result that a lot of smoke escaped into the tent and lampblack got all over the cooking pots, almost insulating them and making it difficult to bring the food to a boil. The indoors cooking being a nuisance, especially now that heat was not necessary in camp, Storkerson undertook to rig an outdoors cooking arrangement which proved satisfactory and was used on all our later trips. Intending to make a “blubber stove” eventually, we had been carrying our six gallons of kerosene in a galvanized iron tank, the sides and bottom of which were clinched as well as soldered so that it could not come to pieces upon application of heat. To have them suitable for blubber stoves we make these iron tanks cylindrical with a diam- eter a little larger than the largest of our aluminum cooking pots and a height of about fifteen inches. When the contents have been used the top is removed and a draft hole is cut near the bot- tom; then half-way up the stove we run two or three heavy wires across for the cooking pot to stand on. In burning seal oil or blubber, as in burning tallow, you must have a wick. Once I considered that asbestos might serve, since it could be used over and over again, but it would probably not be suitable, for the fibers would become so clogged with the incom- bustible residue of oil that its usefulness as a wick would be de- troyed. Anyway, there is a simpler method. After our meals ‘we save the clean-picked bones. When next the fire is to be built we use a little piece of rag for kindling, not necessarily more than 204 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC an inch square, soaked in oil and put on the bottom of the stove. On top of it we make a little heap of the bones and on top of the heap we lay several strips of blubber, resembling so many strips of fat bacon. A match is touched to the rag and it burns like the wick of a candle, with the flame playing up between the bones and striking the blubber, which promptly begins to try out so that the oil drips down between the bones, forming a film on their outside. Upon sufficient heating this film flares up, and thereafter your fire burns with a furious heat so long as a strip of blubber is placed upon it. You now stand your cooking pot, filled with meat and water, upon the cross wires within the stove six or eight inches above the bottom. The flame first strikes the bottom of the pot and then spreads and comes up all around it, since the diameter of the stove is an inch or two larger than that of the pot. Application of heat to the bottom and sides of the pot at one time brings it to a boil as quickly as would the largest wood fire in a forest. The only disadvantage of this method of cooking is that the smoke of burning seal oil is thick and black and exceedingly sticky. It is, in fact, the best quality of lampblack, and clings to every- thing. We are always careful not to have the smoke strike the tent, but now and then a dog, where it is tied, happens to be in the path of the smoke, with the result that any white spots there may be on his coat soon become as dark as the rest of him. One of our almost white dogs was nearly as dark as the blackest by the time we got ashore in Banks Island. Although I had commonly done the cooking in the tent, whether with primus stove or seal oil lamp, either Storkerson or Ole was the cook after the blubber stove had been devised. Storkerson when once his fire was started used to stand aside and keep out of the smoke, but Ole was more solicitous and hovered about, so there is no exaggeration in saying that, although he is naturally a light Norwegian type of blond, he was in color within two weeks something between a mulatto and a full-blooded negro. From this point on we all enjoyed our journey as we had not done before. I never could see anything very attractive and certainly nothing particularly romantic in the portable-boarding- house method of arctic travel. If you have no hope of any food beyond that in your sled, your conscience worries you every time you eat a square meal. In fact, if you are of the historic, heroic type you never allow yourself a square meal, and make stern mem- oranda in your diary about the member of your party who takes a nibble between hours or who eats more than his share. Some ex- THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 205 plorers have gone so far as to shoot members of their party who have infringed on the rations, and this with the full approval of govern- ments at home and of lay readers of their narratives. I know a ease where a lifelong friendship turned into enmity in a night because somebody got up in the dark and ate a quarter of a pound of chocolate. We never felt any resentment towards each other because of the quantities we used to eat, for it was always our understanding that when the chocolate and rice and other things were gone we should begin to live on seals, and it was merely a question of a few days sooner or later, anyway, when that time would come. It had come now, and he who had been free to eat chocolate when he listed was doubly welcome to boiled seal flipper or frozen liver or any other delicacy the sea afforded. Really we had for those ten days of voluntary rations been backsliders from our own doctrine, of which we have since been more faithful followers: “De not let worry over to-morrow’s breakfast interfere with your appetite at dinner. The friendly Arctic will pro- vide.” | Lest memory seem to have spread a rosy haze over events that are five years past, I set down my diary entry of May 19, 1914. It shows the relaxation that came upon us when we were definitely through with the traditional method of arctic exploration, used as a sort of introduction to our trip and abandoned for the method of faith and reliance on nature which we have made our own. “Old times have come again and we are traveling in what I ‘| consider comfort. I don’t like the pemmican method of explora- - | tion, though I concede as readily as any one its merits in its place. Where, as inland in the Antarctic, there is no game, it is the only | method. But with it you are continually worrying whether the ra- tions will last to your destination, and there is nothing more to be hoped for than what you have with you at the start. This is the unsupplemented pemmican method as used by most European ex- plorers. But with a reasonable load of pemmican at the start (cereals and malted milk are better), and with guns and skill, you can be sure in most latitudes of getting farther than your provisions reach—how much farther is always a matter of hope and anticipa- tion. It is thus a game as well as work. Science still has all her }power over you, and so does the desire for approbation of the }erowd or of the elect, and beyond that is the incentive of pure \sport—no sordid desire to best a rival but merely eagerness to show what you and your method can do. And then there is the blessing ‘of not being ‘on rations.’ For nearly two weeks we were on rations, 1 | 206 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC the first experience of the kind I have had when there was some- thing on the sled to eat. In the past I have kept men and dogs on full rations as long as there was one day’s grub ahead, and I wish I had done it this time. I believe we should have been here and perhaps beyond this place before the spell of easterly wind which made the leads that are giving us so much trouble now, had we kept our dogs at full strength by keeping them on full rations, feeding them in five days what we did feed them in ten, for they would probably have gone from five to ten more miles per day. Now the dogs are so poor it will take a week of slow travel and good feeding to get them back to half their normal spirits. It would take about two weeks of approximate rest to get them in real form again. They will soon improve beyond what they have been, however. Even yesterday they pulled a bit better. “As for us, we are taking solid comfort, with no worries for the morrow. If it takes us a month to get ashore, we shall feed well the whole time as we have done to-day—a feast on boiled seal liver, tripe, flippers and blubber. All of us agreed we enjoyed it more than any breakfast we have had this winter. We are staying in camp to-day again to give the dogs a chance to rest and feed up a little. The weather also is not agreeable. There is the sort of haze that might give us snowblindness and which makes it very difficult to pick a trail. With our dogs weakened as they are now, it would be foolish to flounder ahead through rough going when there might be a few yards to one side or the other of us smooth ice which we could see if the sun were out. So we are resting to-day, hoping for sunshine and good luck to-morrow.” May 20th did prove clear as we had hoped, but we had trouble with open water. In the afternoon a lead opened which was about a quarter of a mile wide at the narrowest place and ran at right an- gles to our course, so that we were sure to lose a good deal of ground by following it for a crossmg. Furthermore, it seemed to be widen- ing and the crossing place might not have been discoverable. This was a good time to try our sledboat. Perhaps it seems sur- prising that we had not tried it before, for on many occasions there had been as much as a day’s delay by open water. One reason why we suffered these delays was that on days of good luck we, and especially the dogs, worked so hard that coming upon open water was an excuse for resting, even more welcome than valid. Rest meant not our rest alone, but recuperation for the dogs, so that a day later when the lead had either frozen or closed they were able to pull faster and farther. Another reason was that the leads were Riacinc THE SLepBoat. LAUNCHING THE SLEDBOAT. Crossina A LEaD. LANDING. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 207 seldom actually open water. Usually they had been formed a few hours or even a day before and were covered by young ice which, although not strong enough to support a sled, was thick enough so that it would have had to be broken before a boat could be forced through. Forcing a canvas boat through young ice always chafes it along the water line, and although our raft cover was good qual- ity No. 2 canvas, we felt that a dozen crossings through young ice would probably wear a hole in it. But now the weather was so warm that even if leads were several hours old, the sun had pre- vented the formation of ice and they were as crossable as an ordi- nary river in summertime. Before we came to this particular lead we had already made up our minds that we would use the sledboat at the next one. As a matter of interest I made note of how long it took us to use the boat for the first time. We promptly unloaded the sled, spread the cover on the ground and placed the sled upon the middle of it. We took two sticks about six feet long, carried for the purpose, and lashed one crosswise of the sled near the front end and the other near the back end. Between the ends of these sticks we lashed one of our skis on each side. This made a frame which gave the boat a beam of six feet instead of only about twenty-five inches, which was the width of our fourteen-foot long sled. This frame con- structed, the tarpaulin was lashed up on the sides of the sled, and the sled had become a boat which would carry about a thousand pounds, enabling us to take our load across in two trips, carry- ing each time three of the dogs. It took exactly two hours from the time we stopped at the lead, a quarter of a mile wide, until we had the sled loaded and were on our way again on the other side. The advantage of this system of crossing a lead is manifest to any one, but especially to those who have read, for instance, of Nansen’s boats for crossing open water. These were of fragile can- vas, and as he carried them on the sleds with the canvas stretched tightly over their frames, they were easily punctured when the sleds happened to upset or collide with broken ice. Nansen accordingly found that besides the disadvantage of the great care they required, they were so badly damaged and their covers so full of holes when open water was reached that it took several days of repairs to make them seaworthy. When we were through using our tarpaulin, which was about eigh- teen feet long and ten feet wide, we gave it a beating to remove any clinging ice. Sometimes at low temperatures a quarter of an inch or more of ice had formed on the canvas while we were crossing, 208 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC but as all the interstices between the fibers are filled with lard the tarpaulin cannot possibly become water-soaked. This also gives a surface to which ice cannot adhere tenaciously, but can be removed by rolling the tarpaulin about, walking on it or beating it with a stick. The tarpaulin with its water-proofing of lard weighed about forty pounds, and I don’t believe there was any time when this weight was increased as much as five pounds by the ice that still adhered to it when we rolled it into a bundle and put it in the sled. The bundle resembled a bolt of flannel as you see it in a dry goods store and was loaded in the sled’s bottom, conveniently and with no danger of injury during travel. Of course it is quite true that the sledboat is not as seaworthy as Nansen’s kayaks. Still, Storkerson and Ole, who were both good sailors, once made me the serious proposition that we attempt to cross in it from Nelson Head to Cape Parry, a distance of sixty miles. I don’t think this would have been a sensible thing to do, although it might have been accomplished. The great difficulty was that from the craft’s shape it was not easy to paddle. A young seal was our food on May 20th. The younger the seal the more delectable the meat, and partly because the meat was good and partly because everything was going so well that we were in high spirits, we overdid the feast and on May 21st we did not travel. It may be a disgrace of a sort to confess to such gluttony, but at least it is no reflection on our method of provisioning to say that this was not the only occasion on that journey nor the only one of our journeys when one man or another was indisposed through overeating. Incidentally it shows how well we liked our diet. It does take some time to get used to a meat diet, and Ole was not as yet completely broken in. Storkerson and I that day were the pa-_ tients, but it wasn’t many days before Ole was in equal plight. During this night we were awakened by the dogs barking. There might have been a bear in the vicinity, but none was visible. The dogs, too, were not watching the ice but were looking out towards an open lead. After we had gone back into the tent they began to bark again. This time their barking was explained, for we heard the noise which had surprised and worried them, and which now surprised and interested us though it was by no means a source of worry. It was the blowing of whales. We ran out and saw 4 school of beluga whales passing, northward-bound along the lead. During the next two or three weeks we saw thousands of them. They were usually traveling north or east according to the way the leads were running, but on rare occasions they were traveling THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 209 in other directions. Sometimes the leads were open, but as the frost: was still heavy at night the whales occasionally found themselves in leads covered with young ice. Then it was interesting to see the six or eight-inch ice bulge and break as they struck it with the hump of their backs. A moment after the noise of breaking ice would come the hiss of the spouting whale and a column of spray. Although some of the leads were narrow enough to compel the whales to pass within a few yards of us, we did not try to kill them because they sink instantly and it is no use unless you have a harpoon. On this our first sea journey we should doubtless have carried a harpoon had we expected to encounter whales. Now we have complete faith in the seal, and I do not think it likely I shall ever take along any apparatus for killing or securing animals other than bears and seals. Undoubtedly there are fish in the water, and for scientific reasons it would be of interest to carry some sort of gear for getting them, but I would never bother about fishing for food when seals are to be had. You must have the seals for fuel, anyway, and you might as well get from them your food also. The seal is indeed the best all-around animal of the North. Their skins furnish us with boots, with boats, and with containers for oil. The blubber is food for men and dogs, it supplies hght in winter and heat for house and cooking, and the intestines provide waterproof clothing and translucent material for windows. The temporarily favorable westerly winds came to an end May 22nd and another siege of easterly winds began. But for two days we had good luck. Undoubtedly the ice was all moving west, but the traveling floes pressed upon each other so closely that we always found a corner by which to cross to the next one east. CHAPTER XX MAROONED ON AN ISLAND OF ICE T was without any premonition of what was about to happen that I on May 24th, after we had gone two miles and a half, we stopped at a lead only about a quarter of a mile wide. To cross was impossible because of a strong easterly wind that covered even this narrow water with whitecaps, but such leads usually close and open as the floes crowd and jostle in their drift before the wind. No such thing was destined now to happen. Within the next few hours the lead had widened to five miles and by next day we had no idea how wide it was, for the ice to the east was no longer vis- ible and the waves were rolling in and beating against our floe as if there were nothing between us and Banks Island but an open ocean. Later the lead did narrow to about five miles again, but day after day the young ice refused to get hard enough to bear up the sleds, and nevertheless was so thick that it would have chafed |, a hole in the canvas of our sledboat long before we could have made the other side. We were now a sort of Robinson Crusoe party on a moving island of ice. I explored it the second day and found it to be four or five miles square, but on all sides separated from adjacent floes — by uncrossable leads of ice and mush. Our island was substantial— _ from the height of the hummocks above sea level I judged that many parts of it were over fifty feet thick—so we had as safe a camp site as is possible on sea ice, but there were two things to concern us. — One was that if the easterly wind continued we should fail to meet — the Star at our rendezvous at the northwest corner of Banks Is- land; the other was the problem of food and fuel. If we were forced to spend the summer on the ice, we should have to spend — the winter, too. Could we during the good hunting light store up — enough meat and blubber to last during the winter darkness? And if enough was secured, we might not be able to keep the stores safe through the winter if in some night of darkness and blizzard our ice island should split in the middle of our camp, and each part start — in a different direction if it did not tip on edge, spilling our depots 210 ss = =e Se Ss = =. i a a a THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 211 into the water. This was a spice of prospective danger which kept us from feeling the time monotonous. So soon as we felt certain our marooning would be protracted, we commenced killing seals. There were a great many about, but the mush ice in the leads made it difficult to secure them and after several days of effort we had only three or four safe on the ice be- side us. Then suddenly the food question was answered by the walking into camp of the first bear we had seen since leaving the neighborhood of Alaska. It was about noon, and Ole and I were asleep while Storkerson was standing watch. He was beginning to cook, preparatory to call- ing me for my watch, when the dogs started to bark at a diffident young bear that was hovering about and sniffing the camp from one or two hundred yards to leeward. By the time I had my eyes opened and my rifle in hand he had begun a circumspect approach. We waited till he was within twenty-five yards and then I shot him | about three inches from the heart. His stomach contained nothing, | so he could not have been faring very well the last day or so, but | before that his hunt must have been successful for he was as fat as | is desirable for food. Questions frequently are put to me as to whether caribou meat or musk-ox meat or bear meat or seal meat is good eating, and | then I struggle against impatience, for underlying the query is a | fundamental misunderstanding of human tastes and prejudice in | food. A rule with no more exceptions than ordinary rules is that | people like the sort of food to which they are accustomed. An | American will tell you that he can eat white bread every day but ‘\that he gets tired of rice if he eats it more than once or twice a |month, while a Chinaman may think that rice is an excellent food for every day but that wheat bread soon palls. An Englishman will tell you that beef is the best meat in the world, while in Ice- land or in Thibet you will learn that beef is all right now and then, ‘jbut mutton is the only meat of which you never tire. If a man jis brought up on the west coast of Norway or on Prince Edward pend, he thinks that herring and potatoes make the best of all staple diets, while an Iowa farmer likes potatoes well enough but ‘would balk at the herring, Polar bear is a rare item in the diet of most Eskimo groups that iL have known, and accordingly nearly all of them prefer some other form of meat. But the Eskimos of Prince Albert Sound who on cheir winter hunts in Banks Island live for several months each year nearly exclusively on polar-bear meat are very fond of it. 212 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC As for the members of my traveling parties, we have never become really used to bear meat, although I have myself killed several dozen bears and been present at the killing of many dozen others. Bear has one fundamental defect that has nothing to do with the taste or toughness but lies in the stringy nature of the meat of any but the youngest. The fibers have a way of getting between the teeth and sticking there, making the gums sore, so that after a week or two of bear meat, chewing becomes painful. This apples to the cooked meat, not to the raw. Cooking increases the toughness and brings out the stringiness. I have never eaten any raw meat that was noticeably tough or stringy. Chewing half-frozen meat is like chewing hard ice-cream, while eating unfrozen raw meat cut in small: _ pieces is like eating raw oysters. A second bear came into camp about ten hours after the first. His entry was a good deal more dramatic. As usual, our six dogs were tied near the tent, strung out at intervals of about six feet along the tie line that was fastened at both ends to chunks of ice. All of us were about a quarter of a mile away, Storkerson and Ole in the sled boat, paddling around about fifty yards from the solid ice, — and I with my glasses standing on a hummock directing them where _ to find a dead seal that was partly hidden by some moving mush ice. — My back was towards the camp but Storkerson, who was in the ~ stern and faced it, noticed a bear about a hundred yards from the | dogs, advancing towards them at a steady walk. I started for camp — on a run, and just then the bear caught sight of the dogs and |; began to stalk them. They were all lying down but with their | heads up looking in our direction, for the wind had brought them | the smell of the killed seals. I foolishly shouted to them and this |; only fastened their attention more strongly on me. They were — still oblivious of the bear, which had slunk to one side to be hidden |} by an ice hummock, and with legs bent and almost sliding on his | belly was slowly moving towards them. The shielding hummock — was about twenty yards from the dogs, and I knew that when he |° got that close he would make a dash from cover, yet without any |, suspicion that his attack was aimed at a dog, not at a seal. When |. a bear pounces on a seal he gets him between his claws first but}, bites him almost simultaneously. This action would be so in- |} * stinctive that by the time he realized by smell or otherwise that he |. was not dealing with a seal the dog would be dead or maimed. |t The bear got to the hummock, and half stood up as he rounded — it preparatory to making his dash. I was then about a hundred and ~ twenty-five yards away and was badly out of breath, after a run | THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 213 through soft snow. Although I threw myself down and rested my elbow on the ice, I was so winded it was mainly by luck my bullet struck two inches back of the heart. It must have been chiefly the shock to his spine that made the animal crumple almost mag- ically, his four legs doubling under him and his head resting on the ice. I could see that he was alive, for his eyes followed my move- ments. He was about ten yards from the water, and it is the nature of bears when wounded to try to get into water. My first thought was to prevent this and I foolishly took a position between him and the open lead. It seems to me now that the bear used almost human judgment in what he did. Evidently he must have been recovering from the shock to his spine, though he was bleeding rapidly and would have died from loss of blood in five or ten minutes. But what happened was all comprised in less than two minutes. Just as I might have done in his place with only his resources, he kept his eyes fixed on me and made not the slightest motion for about a minute. In fall- ing he must have sunk slightly backward, for his hind feet were forward under him in just the feline position from which a cat or | lion may leap. Suddenly and without any preparation he launched | himself directly towards me. I had my rifle pointed and it must | have been almost automatically that I pulled the trigger. Had not | the bullet pierced the brain I am afraid it would have gone badly | with me, for as it was he covered about three and a half of the five | yards between us, and collapsed so near that blood spattered my | boots. This incident increased a good deal my respect for the intelli- | gence of polar bears, which has been growing with every encounter. Their unwary approach to a party of men and dogs must not be set down against them as lack of intelligence. They simply have jnot the data upon which to reason, for they never before have en- fp countered any dangerous animal upon the ice. We estimated the age of this bear at about four years, although I have no accurate Ba owledge upon which to calculate the age of bears. He was not |fat but weighed seven or eight hundred pounds, the meat being ‘jabout the equivalent of that of four seals. It seemed likely that \bears would continue to come and evidently it was an economy of lammunition to kill them for meat, but their lack of fat made it necessary to continue seal hunting for the sake of the blubber. Forced wintering on the ice would mean that blubber would be more necessary than meat, for we would have to depend upon it for light and fuel as well as food. Seal blubber at any temperature, 214 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC even at thirty or forty below zero, will lessen in weight day by day, the oil trickling out perceptibly. It is therefore necessary to pre- serve blubber in bags. This we do by skinning the seal through the mouth, or “casing” his skin, to use the language of the furrier. This means that the skinning is commenced at the lips. The hide is turned back and, as the skinning proceeds, pulled backwards over the head and then back over the neck and body as one might turn a sock inside out. When the skinning is done in this fashion, there are no openings in the bag except the natural ones. The flippers have none, for the bones are dismembered at what correspond to the wrist and ankle joints, leaving the flipper unskinned. The nat- ural openings are closed by tying them up like the mouth of a bag. This makes the pok which we use for a seal-oil container and which will hold the fat of about four seals. The same sort of bag may also be inflated by blowing and then forms a float with a buoyancy of two or three hundred pounds. Occasionally instead of using our canvas to convert the sled into a boat we fasten three or four of these inflated poks to the sides of the sled, making a sort of life raft. This is an Eskimo method, satisfactory in warm weather but not in winter, because the water which splashes over the sled turns into an ice coating very difficult to remove.’ While our seal hunting for blubber continued, the bears kept | coming into camp. The third one arrived May 31st and in a pe- culiar way. It was three or four o’clock in the morning, the other men were asleep and I with my six-power glasses was standing on a hummock near the camp watching the ice of the lead, counting |: seals as they came up at distances beyond gunshot and also watching for whales, the northward passage of which was intermittent. The _ lead now was several miles wide and covered with young ice not |i strong enough to walk upon, except near the middle where some of it had telescoped, making it double thickness. As I could see later by careful study of this ice with my glasses, the bear must have been proceeding north along the middle of the lead. Possibly he had seen the camp or been attracted towards it by some noise. I do not remember having made any sound, but he may have heard the dogs—they had been tied up so long and were in such high spirits that they were developing an inclination to fight which, because of their chains, could only be translated into snarling and barking. ; The visitor’s manner of coming was peculiar. The young ice was not strong enough to bear his weight but was too tough to allow comfortable swimming on the surface. He must have been coming THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 215 up ftom one of his dives when [ first saw him, for he was in a hole with his forelegs resting upon the ice on either side of him and with his shoulders out of water. He seemed to be craning his neck to look as far as possible, but apparently the ice would bear no more than the forward third of his body. After a rest of a minute or so and a good look around, he proceeded with a sort of overhand strcke, swimming along the surface and breaking the ice. In five or eight yards he became tired of this, made a dive, and in a few seconds came up through the ice about twenty yards nearer. Here he rested as before, lifting himself and craning his neck as high as the strength of the ice allowed, then swam forward a few yards and dove again. This manner of locomotion was so interesting that I called Storkerson and Ole. The bear made a landing about fifty yards from the camp and just at that moment got the scent of it. He stood and sniffed and then came towards us at a leisurely walk. The dogs had seen him and were furiously barking and tugging at their chains. All this outcry and commotion seemed to be of but mild interest, for the bear gave them only a casual glance now and then as he walked about five or ten yards from them straight for the stored seal meat. I killed him with one shot when he was in a convenient place for skinning. He was a fat bear, the largest we had secured so far, a good deal over a thousand pounds. The fourth bear came while we were skinning number three. He was a yearling and very timid. We had plenty of meat and I de- cided I would not shoot unless he came straight into camp. After studying us for five or ten minutes and sniffing the fresh smell of the bear we were skinning, he evidently concluded that a closer acquaintance would be undesirable and started off at a slow run which must have been intended to be a dignified retreat, but which showed that he was really scared. The fifth bear came on June 3rd, a visit more exciting than any of the others. I was away on a walk about our island, examining all sides to see if there were any chance to get off. Our dogs are tied commonly by making with picks a sort of toggle in the ice through which we pass the end of the tie line. Although ice is readily broken with a sharp blow, one of these toggles is unbe- lievably strong if subjected only to a steady strain. In the whaling at Point Barrow, for instance, half a dozen ice toggles, each no more than five inches in diameter, will stand the strain of hauling @ sixty- or seventy-foot whale out of a lead on to the ice. But in this case thawing had weakened them, and when the dogs made a 216 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC concerted rush towards the bear, putting their weights simultane- ously against the toggles, they broke. Tied together as the dogs were, the bear would have had them at a great disadvantage had he stopped to wait for them, but as soon as he saw them coming he fled, making for the water as a bear always will when he thinks himself in danger. About five yards from shore the young ice broke under him. He did not dive, but started trying to struggle up on the ice, breaking some more of it. The dogs rushed up but had the sense not to go in the water. Storkerson and Ole, out of the tent by this time, saw the great danger to the dogs, each one of which was of priceless value to us. They accordingly began to shoot, although instructions were that no bear was to be killed in the water, as the meat would have been difficult to retrieve. Only the head of the bear was showing much of the time, and partly because of this and partly because of ex- citement, it took a fusillade to kill him that used up more ammuni- tion than we could afford. It was justifiable, however, to do any- thing that increased the safety of our dogs. When this shooting began I was about half a mile from camp. As one shot after another rang out I grew more and more worried. My companions knew as well as I did that-our lives and our suc- cess might depend upon the careful husbanding of ammunition. Yet there was Ole standing up and wastefully shooting from the shoulder like a cowboy firing at Indians in a movie. My momen- tary anger at this extravagance changed quickly to relief when I got home and saw what a narrow escape the dogs had had. Since leaving the shallow waters in the vicinity of the coast of Alaska we had been taking a sounding once every forty or fifty miles and invariably getting one result—1,386 meters with no bot- | tom. This was the full length of our line—about four-fifths of a mile—and it was a continual source of grief to me that the acci- dental breaking of the wire in earlier soundings had left us unable to reach bottom. It had been a theory with many geographers that the ocean north of Alaska was shallow, its bottom an extension of the continental shelf with a consequent average depth of under 400 meters and a concomitant probability of numerous islands stud- ding this shallow sea. But instead of the “continental shelf” we — had below us “oceanic depths,” and at least one ground for expect- ing to find new lands in this unknown sea was gone. At the lead which stopped us we had not taken a sounding im- =} mediately, for we had not traveled far from our last sounding, — but on the second day we sounded and got bottom for the first time | SEALING Waters. Farr WIND AND LEvE. Icr. a ARR a aE Rea Re ee - —— ——— - ‘SQ GdadOLg IVHL avay AH, “CUVZZIIG V YALIV ,IONULSVG,, MONG GNV ING, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 217 at 736 meters. Earlier in the trip it had been our expectation that if our line ever got bottom it would mean the approach to and dis- covery of an unknown land. But recently we had been traveling towards Banks Island, and this sounding merely confirmed the evi- dence of our sextant that we were only forty or fifty miles from the shore of a land that was known, although uninhabited and lit- tle explored. As the wind was steady and strong from the east and our ice drifting westward, it is probable that had we sounded upon our arrival the day before we should have had bottom at a much shallower depth. Daily sextant observations showed that our drift to westward away from Banks Island was continuous day after day although not uniform, and the same was indicated by soundings. May 27th we had 962 meters and on the 28th 1,142. On the 29th we were again in water too deep for reaching bottom with our line. Spring was now full upon us. Thaw water was trickling down the sunny side of the ice hummocks and bird life began to increase. Ivory gulls appeared on the 10th of May and by the 25th had be- come both numerous and friendly. They used to flutter about our camps and walk around within a dozen feet of us with little con- cern. I suppose the real reason for their friendliness was the meat, but still they frequently visited without even taking a nibble, though they were quite welcome to do so, for shortage of food was not going to be one of our serious problems. Barrow-gulls arrived May 24th and so did the common tern. Whales kept traveling by in dozens or hundreds, and the dogs had become so used to their blowing that they no longer barked or gave a sign of attention. Small marine life was abundant in the water. The gulls evidently lived sump- tuously on it, and the seals swam about on the surface feeding lazily. In their stomachs we found both shrimps and small “worms” half an inch long. These shrimps and worms were so abundant in the surface layers of the water that had we been in any such straits as the Greely party when they attempted to live on shrimps, we could have done so with little trouble. By June we had become almost reconciled to our encampment on the ice. We had begun to think that we should have to spend our entire summer there and, of course, where you spend the summer it is advisable to spend the winter, for your gathered store of food and fuel will take you safely through the months of darkness if you camp by it. If you begin traveling in the autumn you have to leave most of your supplies behind and may have difficulty in securing more later for the lack of hunting light. I do not think w 218 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC any one takes an unreasonable degree of risk who travels in the Arctic with only game for food, whether it be on land or ice, during the periods of ample light. But when the daylight begins to fail towards fall, the traveler is under a severe handicap. Realizing this, we had begun to talk about how we would spend the winter on this solid floe that in two weeks had begun to have for us something of the friendliness and security of home, and to speculate about which way we might drift and how far from land we should be by the time daylight came back in the spring and we could resume travel. But on June 5th a chance to leave came at last. The lead be- fore had been narrow enough for crossing had there been open water, but the young ice had always been of that unfortunate sort which obstructed the boat without being strong enough to support the sled. But this morning adhering to our ice island were only about fifty yards of young ice and beyond that a quarter of a mile of open water, and then some strong-looking young ice adhering to the other shore. I had the night watch, as usual, and awoke the men at about one in the morning, telling them that I had decided to try a crossing. It took about half an hour to break a road through the fifty yards of young ice to the water and half an hour after that our first load had been ferried across. A head wind meantime had been increasing and the lead was rapidly widening. By throwing away most or all of our meat and blubber we could have ferried across in two loads with smooth water, but as white caps soon began to run we did not dare to load the sledboat heavily. It seemed to me possible also that the ice on which we were landing was itself only a little island and that we might not be able to travel on it far. This induced us to ferry a fourth load, consisting entirely of meat and blubber. Although we took with us a thousand pounds, we abandoned more than a ton of food on our island. The last crossing was made with some difficulty, for the lead was now nearly a mile wide, as I thought, and a mile and a half as Storkerson and Ole estimated it. The wind had risen to almost a gale and the waves struck the front end of our blunt boat with such force that for ten or fifteen minutes I was doubtful if we were mak- ing any headway. The dogs, always bad sailors in a rough sea and always getting out on the leeward edge of the boat, had been taken across in the earlier trips. Had the wind been even a little stronger, our separation would have been pleasant neither for them, tied on the leeward side, nor for us, marooned on the windward side of ice floes drifting rapidly apart. We got over after a hard paddle, and %, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 219 it fortunately proved that, although our landing beyond the lead had been made on what had been a small floe, this was now connected by some passable young ice to the next ice island beyond, and we were able to proceed by treacherous bridges of young ice from floe to floe eastward for ten miles. Undoubtedly: the ice under us was still moving west, but as we had been carried west only ninety miles during eleven days of en- campment, we were encouraged in feeling that now we were traveling east at least as fast as we were drifting west, and that should there be a change of wind the drift would probably set in the other direc- tion, carrying us towards Banks Island at a speed to add substan- tially to our own traveling. CHAPTER XXI SUMMER TRAVEL ON DRIFTING ICE FLOES, 1914 ter sky” exceedingly useful. When uniformly clouded over the sky reflects everything beneath it in the manner of a mir- ror. If there is below a white patch of ice, then the sky over it looks white, while a black strip of water is represented by a black line in the sky. It is hard on the eyes to travel in cloudy weather and hard on the dogs for picking trail, yet the water sky absent in clear weather more than makes up for these disadvantages. Leads were all about us but the corners of various cakes were touching, and by keeping our eyes on the cloud map above we were able to travel sometimes a day at a time without even seeing water. Fortunately for us, the leads ran in such a direction and the cakes met in such a way that the course which enabled us to avoid the leads was north- east, which was also the course we most desired to travel. But when the sun came out, astronomical observations showed that while we were traveling northeast at an average estimated rate of about ten miles per day, we were being carried south so rapidly that our actual course was southeast. With Norway Is- land the appointed rendezvous, it had been for some time my inten- tion, if we could, to make the landing at Cape Alfred, the most northwesterly corner of Banks Island, so that our ice exploration might be as comprehensive as possible. We would then travel south along the coast to Norway Island, where we would build a beacon on the most conspicuous hill for the information of the Star, and go on, since Norway Island is shown on the chart as only six or eight miles in diameter, and hunting would probably not be good enough to justify a stay. Sealing and consequently bear hunting might be good but we would prefer the mainland to the east on account of caribou, as we wanted their skins for bedding and clothing the com- Ing winter. During the following three weeks in the slow struggle towards shore we were voluntarily delayed by the frequent soundings. For | some days the water was too deep for our length of wire but on 220 N OW we had a good deal of cloudy weather and found the “wa- THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 221 June 11th we again reached bottom, this time at 668 meters. From that point we sounded every few miles, took very careful account of marches between soundings, and located ourselves by astro- nomical observations on every clear day. During this week the struggle was a bit discouraging. Some days travel was impossible because of bad weather and excessive ice motion, and on those days we lost ground, for the ice was always drifting south and sometimes west as well. When we did travel we had trouble not only with open water but with the softness of the snow. Drifts which would have been hard under foot, scarcely recording impressions of the feet of men and dogs in a temperature below freezing, were now heaps of snow resembling granulated sugar, through which it was no easier to walk than through a bin of wheat. The sled sank into this snow so that we had to drag it like a snow plow, and the dogs floundered for lack of solid footing. Sometimes the men had to force the sled forward ten or twenty yards at a time with no help from the dogs, and often this was not possible until after we had tramped back and forward several times making a sort of road for it. On previous expeditions I had had to deal with snow of this sort and been led by it to devise an improvement to the ordinary Alaska sled. Alaska sleds as built in Nome and elsewhere are twelve or fourteen feet long and twenty-one to twenty-eight inches wide. As their pictures show, there are stanchions upward from the runners so that the load is borne on a platform from six to nine inches high. This platform is supported by cross benches underneath between the stanchions, and as the sled sinks these cross benches catch the snow and push it forward. When this happens it is not possible to move the sled without an expenditure of force many times greater than would be necessary if the cross benches did not touch the snow. For travel through soft snow no sled is really suitable except the Indian toboggan, but it is not practical in rough ice nor upon hard roads. There occurred to me a plan for combin- ing the advantages of both types of sled by nailing boards under- ‘|neath the cross benches of the Nome type so that when the runners sank deep enough to bring the body-part into contact with the snow, the under-surface should have the character of a toboggan and ride smoothly over the snow exactly as a toboggan does. Like most innovations, this one had met with no favor among ithe experienced men of my expedition. In Nome I had had several sleds made with toboggan bottoms, but in the southern section of he expedition and also on the Karluk these bottoms had in my 222 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC absence been removed, on the theory that they were an additional and useless weight. In outfitting for my ice journey I had had the toboggan bottom replaced on one sled, but this happened to be the one Wilkins had with him when he got accidentally separated from us. The one we now had was of the ordinary, unimproved Nome type. Not unnaturally my diary entries of those days included more or less wailing over the fact that it did not have a toboggan bottom. My companions were so thoroughly persuaded by our experiences that this was the last ice trip of the expedition where any one wanted to use a sled without a toboggan bottom. By the 15th of June the depth of water had decreased to 350 meters and land birds began to appear, snow buntings and jaeger gulls and a few days later king eiders and old squaw ducks. On June 22nd the soundings had come down to about 50 meters. From a low hummock at this sounding place I looked across about half a mile of level ice to a very high pressure-ridge, and between the crags saw beyond something dark and uniform in outline which I felt sure was land free from snow. Storkerson and Ole were standing beside the dog team, and I called to them to come to the top of the hummock. But they had learned skepticism through frequently taking’ for land either hum- mocks of dirty ice or distant banks of thick, billowy fog. Ole ad- mitted that he saw “something black that might be land,” but Storkerson, perhaps to guard himself from disappointment, main- tained that nothing could be seen which we had not frequently seen before and found to mean nothing. To settle it we hurried the half mile to the high ridge between whose crags the dark outline had been revealed, but one of our sudden arctic fogs had intervened to the eastward and from the ice pinnacle everything in that direc- ; 7 tion now looked white. Just beyond this ridge was a lead of open water which we crossed by an ice cake lying transversely across. We were tired and made camp, but before going to sleep I took a sounding showing 39 meters and land birds began to appear, snow buntings and jaeger Next morning, June 23rd, I was up early and able to write in my diary: “The land is no longer problematic. It is in plain sight in the form of three hills, the more northerly two of which are probably connected, as the southernmost may be also. The north end bears North 17° West and the south hill North 5° East. The distance to the land is not less than ten miles and may be a good deal more.” To those who have given little thought to the peculiarities of the THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 223 magnetic compass, it may seem strange that land lying to the east should by compass be seventeen degrees west of north. This is because the magnetic needle does not point to the North Pole, which is north of us wherever we are unless we are standing on the Pole itself, but approximates towards the magnetic pole, which is at some not yet exactly. located spot in the vicinity of the peninsula of Boothia Felix in northeastern Canada. The saying that the needle points to the magnetic pole is in few places on the earth an exact truth. Its direction from Banks Island, when we speak “true” and not “by compass,” is southeasterly. For several days before we came in actual sight of what proved to be Norway Island, our rendezvous, we had seen in the sky to the eastward a peculiar pink glow. We thought it might be a re- flection of dead grass covering the hills of Banks Island, but it had another cause. When we commenced traveling over the land- fast ice, some twenty miles offshore, we noticed in the snowbanks that peculiar tinge of pink—it may sometimes almost verge on red —due to the microscopic plant known as “pink snow.” It was this that was reflected pink in the sky. The layman finds it curi- ous that these plants appear to flourish best on the north side.ef snowdrifts, where the sun is least warm at any time and where freezing may take place while another slope of the same drift is thawing. In some mountain ranges these plants are said to be so numerous in the snow that it has a pinkish tinge even when held in the hand, but where we have traveled the pink can be seen only at a distance of several yarcs and best at a distance of thirty or forty yards, for on close approach the snow looks only white or a little dingy. We were somewhat surprised to find the ice aground here in thirty-nine meters, or about 120 feet. The actual freezing of sea water does not produce ice in these or probably any latitudes of more than six or seven feet in thickness, but the telescoping of it under pressure may, as we have described elsewhere, increase this thickness indefinitely. Few districts are more frequently under violent stress than the west coast of Banks Island, where some of the pressure-ridges project more than sixty feet above the water, their base resting solidly on the bottom 120 feet below. It is a peculiarity of the strong westerly winds on the north coast of Alaska and the west coast of Banks Island that they bring with them a high “storm tide,’ raising the level of the water six or eight feet above ordinary high tide. The coastal ridges of ice are thus heaped up, especially in the zone lying between five and twenty 224 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC miles from the Banks Island coast. When the thaw winds come in the spring and summer, the warmest are from the east and south- east. The stronger the east winds the lower the “‘tide,” so that the ridges which have been heaped up with a high tide are solidly aground and immovable to any effort of the east wind. For this reason a typical summer condition on the west coast of Banks Island is that the moving pack to seaward is driven far out of sight to the west, and a lane of open water along the land is pro- duced by the warm rivers from the interior, while there remains a belt extending from half a mile to fifteen miles offshore where the ice still lies unbroken and immovable. Occasionally a west wind brings a high tide and then drops suddenly enough to allow an east wind to start before the tide has fallen. Then the entire mass of shore ice may go abroad in two or three hours. Our first sight of land had been from a distance of nearly twenty miles. The going from this point was exceedingly bad. We waded sometimes through water nearly up to our waists, while the dogs had to swim and the sled floated behind like a log of wood towed across a river. A far worse condition was when the miniature lakes on top of the ice were filled not with water only but with slush snow. Though your feet went straight to the bottom, real wading was not possible and either walking or swimming was quite impos- sible to the dogs. In places like this you had to force your way back and forth through the slush several times, making a sort of ditch or canal preliminary to taking hold of the leading dog and dragging the team after you while the other two men pushed the sled from behind. The hardest kind of work gave us only six miles per day. Our first sleep on the land floe had a comfort and security - about it that we had not known for over ninety days. No drift could now take away from us in the night whatever distance we had _ won during the day. No crack would open under us, no cake would tip on edge to spill us into the water. Later years brought us thorough familiarity and confidence in the ocean ice, but the relief and at-home-ness of the land ice then were beyond description. Besides the uncertainty of reaching Norway Island in order to meet the Star in the fall, we had also the unacknowledged doubt of whether we could reach land at all. No matter how sound the reasons for your confidence in a theory, it seems to be part of a somewhat irrational human nature +hat you never feel quite sure of being able to do anything unless you know that some one has done it before. The universal skepticism on the Alaska coast THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 225 among whites and Eskimos alike of the possibility of making the five- or six-hundred-mile journey over frozen ocean to northwest Banks Island had somehow soaked into our bones. So far we had never slept without feeling, although there was no evidence to our senses, that our beds were drifting. Sometimes it was a drift favor- able to us and sometimes against, but there was always the gam- bler’s tenseness about these erratic camping places that were always carrying us either toward or away from our goal. The passive se- curity of the land-fast ice was a feather bed and down pillow which brought the first real relaxed sleep for three months. CHAPTER XXII LAND AFTER NINETY-THREE DAYS ON DRIFTING ICE ' ) YE landed on June 25th at 8:10 in the evening, ninety-six days out from the Alaska coast. Measured by a string laid on the surface of a globe the journey is a little over five hun- dred miles, but a checking up of astronomical observations shows — that, counting the adverse drift, we had traveled about seven hun- | dred miles. But whether the trip be called five hundred miles or | seven hundred, neither figure measures its difficulty. If the same — | journey were to be undertaken by a party equipped like ours each | year for ten years and were to be started a month or six weeks earlier than we started, I believe it could be done, in at least nine seasons — out of the ten and perhaps in every one of the ten seasons, on the average in about half the time that it took us. For our difficulties — were not the mileage but the warmth of the weather, with conse-— quent mobility of the ice and treacherous ice bridges that after — each gale formed all too slowly between the floes. If we were to | make the journey again we should also start with a lighter load — from Alaska, having now no longer a mere theory, but a theory veri- — fied by trial, to give us complete confidence in the food and fuel supplied by the arctic high seas. 4 On the last day we had camped on the sea ice a mile and three-_ quarters from shore. We might have been impatient to reach the land that lay green and close to us in the sun, but from the point of - view of the arctic traveler the fundamental difference is not between sea and land, but between the moving ice on one hand and the land-_ fast ice and land on the other. When we had left the moving pack | for the grounded shore floe, we had already counted ourselves ashore. | Still there was an interest all its own in stepping on the real — land. There was plant life, with a kind of academic interest to | the eyes, and there was the more practical importance of the animals |}, and birds. Whatever else these animals and birds might be, they were potential food for us or food for the animals on which we feed. — For, according to the law of this grewsome world, the worm implies — the song-bird that feeds upon it, and the song-bird implies the owl 226 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 227 that robs the little bird’s nest and eats its young; the lemming im- plies the fox, and the footprint of a caribou or an old antler lying bleaching upon the hillside tells not only of the magnificent stag and gamboling fawn, but of the packs of wolves that follow the stag for days across the rolling hills and eventually eat him alive when he falls from exhaustion. (Only in the books of the nature faker is the wolf fleet enough to overtake the caribou after a short rush, and his fangs long and keen enough to cut the jugular vein. If animals have a sense of humor it is a pity they cannot read our popular nature stories or come to see an occasional “Great North Woods” or “God’s Country” movie.) From the first sight of land our concern had been to get ashore, so that we had left unkilled several seals along the way. Accord- ingly, we landed with no food for the dogs and only about half a meal for ourselves. While we were still a mile from shore with the southward slope of Norway Island conveniently spread out ahead, my glasses revealed one wolf, one fox, eight hares, some king elders, Pacific eiders, old squaw ducks, and three dark geese, one of which on closer approach proved to be a Hutchins. After landing we saw some willow ptarmigan, plovers, Lapland longspurs, snow buntings, and two or three kinds of sandpipers. We found also the exgorgita- tions of owls and saw a few bees and blue-bottle flies. There were no mosquitoes, our later intimate acquaintances on the mainland. Caribou tracks were on the beach, and while our side of the island certainly contained no caribou as reviewed from seaward, there might be some on the other slope. So I left the men to make our first camp on shore and to gather pieces of driftwood for the first campfire, and went to the top of the island to get a view of | the far side. The island proved to be only about half as large as {the Admiralty chart has it, only half as far from the next land jeast, and with the long axis at about right angles to what it should be by the chart. I ascended the most westerly of the hills, so that turning to the east I had to look first over three miles of the island and beyond -that over three miles of ice to examine what I then thought was the mainland of Banks Island. And it should have jbeen the mainland by the chart, but it proved to be an island about jtwice the size of Norway Island and much more fertile. That is- land we later named after Captain Peter Bernard of the Sachs. | In hunting on the grassy plains of the Arctic, a good pair of glasses and a knowledge of their use are about as important as the quality of your rifle and the pair of legs that carry you. I have 1 found it as difficult to teach a new man the proper use of field | 228 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC glasses as to teach the use of the rifle or the understanding of any of the principles of hunting in the open country. The green man stands erect with his heels together, lifts the glasses jauntily to his eyes and spins slowly around on one heel, taking from half a min- ute to a minute to make a complete survey of the horizon. Then he announces that there is no game in sight. The experienced hunter will take some pains to find the best place to sit down, will bring out from somewhere a piece of flannel that is clean no mat- ter how dirty he himself and every other item of his outfit may be, and wipe every exposed lens till he is sure there isn’t a speck or smudge anywhere. If the landscape is well within the power of his glasses he will probably rest his elbows on his knees, but if the dis- tance is great or the wind blowing, he will he down flat with elbows on the ground, or will build up out of stones or any available ma- terial a rest for the glasses that cannot be shaken by the wind. If the wind is blowing hard he may even place a fifteen- or twenty- pound stone on top to keep them steady. There is never any pivot- ing or swinging motion as he brings them to bear upon successive fields of view. If the angle of vision is six degrees, as it may be with six-power glasses, or three degrees with twelve-power, he ex- amines thoroughly the field disclosed by their first position and then moves them a less number of degrees than they cover, so that the second field of view shall slightly overlap the first. In calm weather and with an ordinary landscape it takes about fifteen minutes for one good look around from a hilltop, and under special conditions it may take a good deal more. If, for instance, some- where near the limit of the power of the glasses is seen a patch that may be a caribou but which may also be a stone or a wolf, it may take an hour of study to make sure. Six little white specks on a hillside were apparent now on what || I thought was the mainland, a mile or two from the beach. The — sky was clear and there was that quivering, wavy motion in the | hi atmosphere which is due to the sun shining on areas of different na- ture, causing air currents to rise that differ in temperature and ; ti humidity. Through such an atmosphere all things have blurred out-_ |) lines even if their shapes are not otherwise distorted, and the shape || may easily appear fantastic. Small stones, round or flat, may look | like tall pillars and even appear to-move. If stones or the like © appear to move they will all seem to be moving in the same direc- |/& ' tion. This may be the case with caribou, although they seldom retain their relative positions as immovable bodies seen through a mirage would do. My six specks looked round and had blurred | mn THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 229 outlines, so there was no telling whether they were stones or caribou until one’s mind was made up by study. They might have been white geese, for in looking across a range of hills and then over some invisible ice beyond to a second land, there is no easy way of estimating distance. It took about half an hour of watching before one of the bodies moved with reference to the other five. These were then not stones, since one of them had moved, and not geese, because six geese at this time of day would not have retained their positions relative to each other unchanged for half an hour. By a process of elimination, they were caribou, which had all been lying down, until just now when one got up and moved a few steps. The men in the camp below had supper cooked and could be seen waiting for me; but as there were no caribou on the island and we had only half a meal of food, and as a wolf might come along and chase away my band of caribou or fog arise to shut them from view, I decided to go after them at once. Following the sky line of the island to make sure that the men saw which way I was going, I started eastward at a brisk walk. I knew they would infer that there was no use waiting supper, I also expected they would infer that they were free to eat all the meat there was. To have saved a third of it might have been courteous and even kind, but they ate it all on the assumption that I would secure my own supper before I came back, which was a vote of confidence I valued far beyond kindness or courtesy. When I started towards the caribou I thought I was going after my supper, but it turned out to be breakfast. For when after three hours of walking I came within half a mile of them, I found them grazing near the middle of a huge saucer-shaped bowl of grass-land where it was impossible to approach from any side without being seen. In an uninhabited island caribou might popularly be expected not to be afraid of aman. As I understand their psychology, neither would they if they could know he was aman. But how are they to know it when with their poor eyesight they can see an object and ‘jstill not be able to tell whether it is a wolf or a caribou? When anything comes unexpectedly into sight they make their decision on the side of discretion, assume what they see is a wolf and promptly flee, although as often as not what they flee from is an- other caribou or some other, to them, entirely harmless animal such as a fox or polar bear. In view of the topography and of the nature of caribou, there was nothing for me to do except to wait. Of course I might have adopted the hunting tactics of the Slavey and Dog-rib Indians of 230 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC the mainland, who rush up to a band of caribou at top speed, hop- ing to get within shooting range before they begin to run, and hoping also that because of their peculiar antics the caribou will be con- vinced at once that they are not wolves, and will circle to get a better look or to get to leeward to prove it by the sense of smell. I have often seen this method used by Indians and never with great success. They may get one or two out of a band or they may get none, and their stories of occasionally killing whole bands I have never verified, nor has any one on whom I thoroughly rely. But by more common-sense methods, one can usually get every animal of a band of six or eight. In a country where game is scarce, as it is in nearly every region where I have hunted, it is © necessary to kill a majority of the animals seen, and I long ago discarded the haphazard methods of the Indian, which too often leave you hungry and empty-handed after several hours to begin the hunt all over again. The caribou grazed in the center of their bowl from half-past eleven that night until about three in the morning. They then lay down for an hour, and about four o’clock commenced grazing slowly in a direction directly away from me. What I had to do was to move a little farther off, till at something over half a mile I was sure they could not see me. Then I circled to be directly in front of them and lay for about an hour motionless till they were within two or three hundred yards, when I shot all six in eight shots. The work of skinning and dismembering took some time and it was an eight-mile walk home, so that by the time I arrived at camp the men had had a good night’s sleep and were up and ready to cook _ breakfast. Only they had nothing to cook. They knew it was one _ of my most firmly adhered-to rules that on any long trip where am- __ i munition has to be husbanded, no animal smaller than a wolf shall be killed. They had been discussing how good the geese on the hillside would taste, and wondering whether I might not be willing a to make an exception in this case and allow the landing to be cele- brated with a goose or two. They had even come to a decision, and one of our proudest traditions might easily have been shat- — tered by the expenditure of a bullet for five pounds of meat when ; b it should have brought one hundred. But the tradition was saved f by my arrival with six caribou tongues for a preliminary break- — fast, and the announcement that by moving seven miles we could camp in the vicinity of the deer-kill with driftwood enough to cook — two or three successive meals of boiled caribou heads. q When we got ashore Storkerson and I had a real feast of boiled THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 231 heads. But not poor Ole, who sat eating steaks of caribou ten- derloin and wishing he had salt or onions to make it less insipid. It must be said for Ole, however, that he learned more quickly than most tenderfeet, for we had not been in Banks Island more than a week when he quit frying steaks for himself and began to join us in the eating of boiled heads and briskets and ribs. The tastes of the northern hunters who live on meat alone are nearly uniform whether they be Indians, Eskimos, or white men resident with either people, though they differ strikingly from the tastes in meat acquired in connection with modern European cook- ing. These northerners eat their meat by taste, as our ancestors must have done when originated the saying, “The nearer the bone the sweeter the meat.” Nowadays we do not judge meat with our palates according to its flavor but with our teeth according to its “tenderness.” To aid our teeth in the judgment of meat we call on our eyes to differentiate between dark and light meats. One of the main difficulties in trying to introduce a new meat into the | dietary of a “civilized” people is the problem of matching it in color with some meat already in favor. I have known white hunters who carried salt with them to stick for a surprisingly long time to European ideas of cooking. But if one has no salt the organs of taste recover rapidly from even scores of years of abuse with seasonings and sauces. When the sense of taste has regained a moderate delicacy, white men fall naturally into agreement with the Eskimos and northern Indians in classifying the parts of caribou about in the following descend- ing order of excellence: The head is best, and except the marrow the most delicious fat is back of the eyes. These flavors are the strongest and most pleas- ing of the whole caribou. Then comes the tongue. Next are brisket, ribs and vertebra, but in all of these we usually remove for dog feed some of the outer meat, reserving for ourselves the “sweet meat near the bone.” Next come hearts, kidneys, and the meat near the bone on the neck. Shoulders are next. These are more often eaten by the Indians than the Eskimos, as are also the hearts, apparently because the Indians use roasting now and then as a method of cooking, and these parts seem better roasted. Here it may be remarked that frying is a method of cooking “junknown to the natives of northern North America and they take very badly to it, except the frying of bacon, ham and imported meats generally. I have known both Indians and Eskimos pro- ‘ficient enough in white men’s cooking to have jobs as cooks in 232 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC trading posts or on ships, but even they go back to exclusive boiling and roasting of native meats and fish if they start housekeeping for themselves. It is seldom among the Alaska and Mackenzie River Eskimos that caribou hams are eaten when there is enough of other meat. The hams, some of the entrails, the lungs and liver, the outside meat from the neck and brisket, and the tenderloin are the food of the dogs. There are partial exceptions to this rule, for several rea- sons. When fuel is scarce, as it oceasionally is im Coronation Gulf, boned hams are cooked, as they require less fuel per pound, being cut in small pieces for boiling. The summer of 1916, for instance, we were compelled to eat ham meat for lack of fuel. Also when you are drying meat it is often convenient to dry hams, which are more easily sliced thin; as dry meat, they will be eaten later. Still, the Slaveys and other Indians usually prefer drying boned rib meat, and these are the favorite food of the Hudson’s Bay Company’s men and other northern fur traders, who buy them from the Indians. Such are, roughly, the tastes and preferences in lean or mod- erately fat meat that are common among the native northern meat- eaters and that are acquired by whites soon after they quit using salt and other seasoning.* The tastes of meat-eaters as to the various fats of caribou and similar animals are perhaps more interesting than other sections of the same subject, for the reason that people of European culture have during the last three centuries allowed sugar to usurp almost wholly the field of gustatory delights where fats were once supreme, while yet the phrase “to live on the fat of the land” had a keen appeal to the senses. I judge from the experience of myself and others that no one while living on the typical modern diet, largely made up of pro- tein, sugar and starch, is capable of delighting in the fine shades of flavor between different kinds of fat. But this power comes very soon irrespective of climate to whoever lives on unseasoned animal — foods exclusively. Then, whatever the race or bringing-up, there ~ seems little variety in tastes as to fats. I imagine this would be so were the animals eaten cattle or sheep or fowl. I know with caribou that negroes, South Sea Islanders, Indians, Eskimos and Europeans” * For a more detailed discussion of Eskimo tastes in food, see the section on “Food” in “Anthropological Papers of the Stefansson-Anderson Expedi- tion,” New York, 1914. = ie a a Se “Se eee THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 233 of varied nationality generally agree that in point of palatability the fats of the caribou should be ranged as follows: The least agreeable is the back fat. When tried out and made into tallow, it is harder than that from any other part of the animal. Next are the intestinal fat and the fat found in the interstices of the meat, as on the’ribs, etc. The fat near the bone on the brisket is considered somewhat better than the last two varieties. Next would come the kidney fat. Best of all are the fat behind the eyes and the little lump of fat on the hind leg near the patella. If these fats are tried out the ones considered preferable in taste generally make the softest tallow. Kidney fat, for instance, is softer than intestinal fat, and intestinal fat is softer than back fat. However, the fat from behind the eyes and from the leg are no softer than the kidney fat, although considered of a better flavor. This discussion refers to fats eaten after being brought to almost or quite the boiling temperature of water; in other words, underdone boiled fat. Marrows are usually eaten raw by the northern Indians and almost always by the Eskimos and by experienced white hunters, although the femur and humerus are sometimes either roasted or boiled. In palatability the marrows are simple to classify, for the preferred ones are nearest the hoof, the ones farther away the least agreeable. While delicious, the marrow of the small bones near the hoof is seldom eaten because it is bothersome to get at and there is so little of it. In the long bones the marrow is not only pref- erable nearer the hoof when you take it bone by bone, but there is a distinct difference between the upper and lower end of each bone, the marrow of the lower end being better. More exactly than in the case of the fats, the various marrows agree in hardness and palatability; that is, the softer the marrow the more palatable. This means also that the softest marrows are nearest the hoof and get harder and drier as you go up. We are speaking of their consistency at ordinary house or summer tempera- tures, say 70° F. At this temperature the marrow of the small bones near the caribou hoof is a clear liquid, of about the appearance of melted lard that is almost cold enough to congeal. We use it sometimes for gun oil if we run out of the commercial kinds. Not only are the marrows harder away from the hoof but the same applies to the fat after it is tried out. Tried-out fat from the phalanges is a thick liquid; tried-out fat of the humerus or femur is a tallow about as hard as if made from kidney fat. Apart from those already discussed, there remains but one im- 234 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC portant kind of caribou fat and that is the tallow secured by first crushing and later boiling the bones. A difference in flavor and hardness may exist between tallows made from different bones but in this regard we have no experience, for when bones are pounded to be boiled for fat they are taken indiscriminately, vertebre and briskets, head bones, long bones, back bones, etc. This discussion relates to the season when the caribou are fat. At certain seasons no fat is discernible, even behind the eyes or close to the bone of the brisket. The marrow in all the bones alike is then liquid and has the appearance of blood, and I do not know that there is a difference in consistency or flavor. Such marrow when boiled congeals into a slightly tough substance, resembling the white of hard-boiled egg both in texture and flavor, or rather lack of flavor. Experiment has shown us that fats and marrows of mountain sheep, musk ox and moose are to be elassified both in flavor and consistency about as those of caribou, with two principal exceptions: In the moose it is considered that “moose nose” is about the most agreeable. In the musk ox the fat of the neck is rated higher than that of the back, while on the caribou there is not much fat on the neck and what there is is considered to have no specially fine flavor. Apart from any intrinsic interest these notes may have as ap- — plied to the caribou directly and from their analogy to other mam- mals used for food, I offer them thinking that students of human anatomy may not in their investigation of the marrow of man have noticed these differences. It seems to me it would be interesting to note whether human marrow gets harder the farther away from the toes and finger-tips. The question of comparative flavor of human ~ marrows will probably have to remain speculative. CHAPTER XXIII RECORDS, RETROSPECTS AND REFLECTIONS an island about eight miles in its longest diameter and three or four hundred feet high, with the mainland about a mile away from the eastern end and about three miles to the south of our camp. There was only one more caribou on the island. This we killed and with its meat and what remained of the other six we crossed over and made an encampment on a sandspit near a good harbor. Here was considerable driftwood not only for fire but for building an elevated platform, upon which we stored such belongings as might be injured by foxes and other animals. Incidentally, we hoped that this conspicuous landmark might be seen by the Star when she came along and might guide her to where we were. At Norway Island we had erected the day after landing a conspicuous beacon on the highest hill. It contained a brief record of our journey from Alaska, and said that we expected to spend the summer hunting on the mainland to the east, accumulating meat for food and skins for clothing for the coming winter, and that we would be on con- tinual watch for the Star. June 28th and the days following Storkerson made a map of Bernard Island and killed on the coast one wgrug, or bearded seal, and some small ordinary seals, while I examined the mainland, especially to the east. We found Bernard Island to be in the mouth of a river larger than one would expect on Banks Island, in spring | more than half a mile wide, while even ten or fifteen miles inland and as late as August when the water is far below spring level, } one who does not want to swim has to look carefully for a ford. By September, however, there are numerous places where the stream is no more than knee deep, generally where it is wider and more | rapid, so that the width of a ford fifteen or twenty miles inland will be thirty or fifty yards. In the comparative leisure of these first days ashore I made | long retrospective diary entries dealing with the circumstances under which we left Alaska and with the journey to Norway Island. Again I find reflections on how much more we could have accom- 235 4 he day after moving to the deer-kill we discovered we were on 236 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC plished had we been able to start a few weeks earlier from Martin Point, again the regret of our lost equipment in the separation from Wilkins and Castel. I find an entry about Storkerson and An- dreasen in which, as I felt at the time, I gave them less than their due: ‘They are as well suited for this work as it is easy to 1m- agine. Neither of them worries or whines and both are optimistic about the prospects. This last is important. Traveling with an empty sled and living off the country is no work for a pessimist.” The longer the time that intervenes the more my feeling of grati- tude to these men and my appreciation of them has grown. Those who have gone through a difficult experience anywhere will know that nothing more could be said, after all, than this: that if I had a similar trip to make over again I could not imagine any com- panions I should prefer to Storkerson and Ole. The diary record of our dogs is that “they have done probably better work than any team in Arctic exploration. Two hundred and forty-four pounds to the dog is, I believe, a heavier load than dogs have heretofore hauled, and ours came near making thirty miles a day with that load in fair going. We have never had to do more than help them over the worst places.” An Arctic traveler’s feel- ing of gratitude to the dogs can be scarcely less keen than to men. Still, there was one of them, the same “Bones,” who did little hard work after warm weather began. Nothing could induce Bones to pull steadily when the sun was shining warm on his sleek, fat back. When we landed, all our dogs were as fat as it is good for a dog to be, but Bones was fatter than that. Possibly this was his trouble. What one thinks ‘at the time” has its significance, so here is a diary estimate of the journey: “Our success, although less than half of what it would have been with a start three weeks earlier (so it looks now), has been greater than we had any reason to hope on March 22nd when we left Martin Point. We have carried a line of soundings of over — 4,500 feet through four degrees of latitude and nineteen degrees of longitude, most of it unexplored and all of it unsounded ocean. We have determined the ‘continental shelf’ off Alaska and off Banks Island, and have learned something of the currents of the Beau- fort Sea. Most of what we have learned is contrary to what men ~ ‘knew’ before. This summer we may be able to do some further useful work in geography, geology and archeology in Banks Island. _ Next winter (if the Star and Sachs are able to follow my instruc- tions) we can with our greater experience and better base hope for a more successful year. Counting on them, I now plan two trips; THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 237 one northwest from Cape Alfred, then north and then east to the north end of Prince Patrick Island; the other northwest from the north end of Prince Patrick Island, then north and east to Isachsen Land and back to Prince Patrick or Melville Island (in whichever place the Star is wintering). The most promising and interesting ice trip that I*can see, however, would be to go north from, say Cape Halkett in Alaska in February to 77° or 78° N. latitude and then east to Prince Patrick Island. That is a trip I hope some time to make.” * And here is the record we placed in the beacon on Bernard Island: “June 30, P. M., 1914. “Storker Storkerson, Ole Andreasen and myself landed on the island next offshore from this one June 25th—men, dogs and gear all in good condition. Shall proceed to-morrow SE to the mainland. According to circumstances we may go up the river, in the mouth of which this island lies, to explore it; or we may go south along the coast towards Kellett. If no traces of us have been found farther south, any vessel of the Canadian Arctic Expedition finding this should proceed south along the mainland ten or fifteen miles in search of a beacon with further informa- tion. If none is found, the vessel should erect a beacon or two with infor- mation and then go back to this island or some place near it and prepare to winter. Wood should be energetically gathered from the beach within 20 miles each way and caribou should be hunted early to provide fat meat. There appears to be a good harbor on the SE side of the island (just beyond the prominent hill on the S corner). There seems also a harbor on the east of the island offshore from this one and there may be others on the mainland. If no suitable harbor is found, the vessel should look for one to the north rather than the south. The Karluk, should she come, might try te reach Prince Patrick Island if her com- mander thinks it advisable; the North Star and Mary Sachs should not go beyond Banks Island (except after picking us up). If no traces of us are found, small caches with things not likely to be destroyed by bears might be made for our use in two or three places. We have over 200 rounds of ammunition and both rifles are in good order, so there need be no fear for us on the score of starvation. “V. Stefansson.” For the first week or two in Banks Island we saw each day some new kind of bird. On June 30th appeared the first phalarope and the first rock ptarmigan, although there had been already per- * A trip commencing with such a program was actually made in 1918. On account of my illness, the command was taken by Storkerson who has written an account of the enterprise which I have summarized in the Appendix of this book. 238 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC haps a hundred willow ptarmigan. From the fact that no females appeared, it is probable that ptarmigan were already nesting. No ravens or hawks were noticed the first part of the summer, al- though we now know that both ravens and golden eagles are na- tive to the vicinity at this time of year. We have now come to a point where we must mention an animal that touches this story frequently later on, the “musk ox.” And I don’t think we had better call him “musk ox” in the rest of the book. The name is in a sense libelous of him, as it is in a sense deceptive to the reader. I have made no researches to discover who first perpetrated the blunder of calling him “musk ox.” It may have been some early English navigator who was a better sailor than zodlogist and mis- identified him with the musk deer of Asia. Or possibly he was more of a trader than he was a scientist and wanted to lead people to believe that he had discovered a new commercial source of the costly musk perfume of our ancestors—a trick with many parallels in early exploration, of which none is more interesting than Eric the Red’s frank admission that he named Greenland so in order to induce his fellow Norsemen to colonize it. But once under the view of keen-eyed scientists the “musk ox” (and now we are through with the word, for we can exchange it for a better) got the fairly truthful descriptive name of ovibos, or sheep- cow. This is what he is to the casual view—a cow (or bull) with a coat of wool. For a description of his peculiarities and his excep- tional merits from the point of view of usefulness to us humans, we shall wait for the account of that period of our adventures when he was our intimate and (so far as we would let him) friendly — associate. For the present I shall merely convey a hint of some of many — reasons for refusing to imply by a misnomer that this animal has © attributes that are really foreign to him. Sverdrup * says: “Having shot many of these animals and drunk the milk of the cows, with- out ever detecting the flavour of musk from which they are sup-_ posed to derive their name, I have decided to call them in this book polar oxen.” We shall in general follow Sverdrup, and the great British explorers of the middle century who usually referred to these — animals as “cattle.”** It requires inhibition to refrain from using — = es Land,” by Otto Sverdrup, London, 1904. See footnote to p. 35 of { ol ** See the various journals of the Franklin Search as printed in the British” Parliamentary Blue Books. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 239 “ovibos” as a “popular” name, and perhaps I shall do so occasion- ally—not so much to give variety as to see how the reader likes it. But for the weighty authority of the Parliamentary Blue Books and of Sverdrup, who give us the precedent for calling them “cattle,” “polar cattle,’ and “polar oxen,” I should have favored ‘“ovibos” as a name for daily speech no less than for scientific use. We soon came to the conclusion that while polar oxen were now either rare or extinct in our immediate vicinity, there had been tre- mendous numbers up to thirty or forty years ago. This was to be inferred from the number of bleaching skeletons. Later I lived in Melville Island, a present habitat, where they are supposed to be as numerous to the square mile as in any ordinary arctic territory; and yet it is clear from the number of bones that there must have been at least ten times as many to the mile in Banks Island as there are now in Melville Island. This is natural and follows from the greater fertility of Banks Island. It is not in the main a matter of latitude but of topography. Melville Island is prevailingly moun- tainous, with large stretches where there is scarcely a blade of grass; the valleys and low places may be fertile enough, yet there are low, flat plains almost as rocky and barren as the mountains. In Banks Island there are mountains in the north end and in the south, but the rugged topography even in these places affords more areas suited to vegetation than does Melville Island. About three- | quarters of Banks Island, embracing the entire middle, is best | described to the person who has not traveled in the Arctic as typical | prairie land. In the days before North Dakota was settled by | farmers, I have seen there areas which could not by a casual glance | be distinguished from the central portions of Banks Island. If you 4 are a botanist and look closely at the nearby ground you will no- ) tice strange plants that do not grow in North Dakota, but you | will notice also many familiar plants, such as bluegrass, timothy, golden-rod, dandelion, poppy, watercress and edible mushrooms. | But if you glance off to a distance you will see the same sort of green | hills rolling away towards the horizon whether you are in Banks | Island or in certain parts of Nebraska, North Dakota or southern | Alberta. If there is a difference it is likely to be in the greater num- lber of small lakes in Banks Island, although even these are not jvery numerous, because the island has what the geologist calls ‘mature drainage,” so that little creeks carry off the water that jmight otherwise be left in the form of ponds and lakes. This was an ideal country for polar oxen, which are grass-eaters, with mouths not adapted to the picking up of the lichens that hug 240 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC the rocky ground where they typically grow. In the opening of many paunches I have never found any appreciable amount of lichens, and am of the opinion that whatever lichens one does find have been accidentally picked up with the grass. This shows how much at variance with the facts must be the common belief that they prefer a mountainous and rocky country. In Melville Island and elsewhere I have found the living animals and the bones of the dead most abundant in the grassiest country, which, other things being equal, is also the most nearly level and the lowest. In moun- tainous districts animals will be found in the deep valleys grazing in sunny spots, not for any desired warmth, but merely because that is where the grass grows most luxuriously. If the bones of the dead are occasionally found on rocky hilltops, it is because the bands have retreated there in an attempt to defend themselves against the attacking Eskimos. The absence of cattle from the fertile hills and valleys of Banks Island where they were recently so numerous has a historical ex- planation. The scattered bones are a confirmation of McClure’s statement that when he wintered in Prince of Wales Straits and in the Bay of Mercy in the years 1850-53 “cattle” were numerous everywhere. In 1906 at Herschel Island I was told by whalers that, a few years before, a landing had been made in southwest Banks Island from the Penelope, which was then owned and commanded by Eskimos, and the Narwhal, commanded by Captain George Leavitt, and that recent traces of polar cattle as well as of Eskimos hunting them had been seen near Cape Kellett. Then in May, 1911, when I visited the Prince Albert Sound | Eskimos,* I found that most of that group spent a part of the win- ter in southeast Banks Island and that some of them occasionally spent the summer in the interior. From them I learned that cattle were occasionally found, and they told me specifically about a small band which during the spring of 1911, probably March, came down from the hills to the coast at the southeast corner of Banks — Island, where they were killed. These same Eskimos told me that ata time which I estimated as less than half a dozen years after McClure abandoned his ship the Investigator in the Bay of Mercy, some Eskimos had found her. She was to them, naturally, a veri- table treasure house, especially for her iron. The news spread through Eskimo communities as far south as Coronation Gulf and east towards King William Island, and the Bay of Mercy for twenty or thirty years became a place of pilgrimage for perhaps a *See pp. 281 ff., “My Life With the Eskimo.” THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 241 thousand Eskimos. They made long trips there to get material for knives, arrow points, and the like, certain families making the journey one year and other families another year. Banks Island, which is less than 20,000 miles in area, has prob- ably always been, as it is now, a country only moderately supplied with caribou. However that may be, cattle are much easier for Eskimo hunters to kill and the people who made the journeys to the Bay of Mercy undoubtedly lived during the summer largely on their meat. A few, after a hasty visit to Mercy Bay, may have gone to the southwest quarter of the island where geese can be killed by the thousand with clubs during the moulting season. Ovibos is one of the most conspicuous animals on earth and easily found. He has not the cunning for concealment nor the ability, and indeed not the temperament for flight. The Eskimo method of hunting is to sick a few dogs at the herd, which then forms in a defensive circle, the large animals on the outside and the calves and weaker ones in the center. This defense does well against the dogs, as it would against a similar attack of wolves, but is of no avail against the Eskimos, who lash their hunting knives to their walking sticks, converting them into lances, and go up and stab the entire herd. Or they may use their bows and copper-pointed arrows with equal effect. When I got the story in the spring of 1911 about the discovery by the Eskimos of McClure’s ship and their pilgrimages for a score of years to the island, I might have inferred the complete or ap- proximate extinction of ovibos. I had not done so, however, and for some time after landing in Banks Island we were expecting daily to come in contact with them. We now know that the giving out of the iron in Mercy Bay must have been about coincident with -\their extinction. Their survival was longest in the south end of the island because that was most remote from the iron and therefore least visited. That the Eskimos had spent a part of each winter from February to April on the southeast coast does not affect the case materially, for at that season these Eskimos never hunt inland, or at least did not do so up to 1917, though they will doubtless change their habits as soon as the majority of them receive rifles from the incoming traders. It was not these winter visits, therefore, out the summer ones that led to the extermination of the polar ox. CHAPTER XXIV SUMMER LIFE IN BANKS ISLAND gulls. We predatory animals do not get along together any too well and are inclined to be jealous of one another. On this occasion I had killed a caribou that had a little fat, and while I was gone after pack dogs to fetch the meat, some gulls and ravens had found the carcass. They did not have time to eat much, but they did have time to eat every speck of fat. We had given up seal hunting because the pursuit of the seal on the summer ice is a very sloppy undertaking. Caribou fat was therefore precious to us and was as yet of limited quantity because the season was too early. Hence my annoyance at the gulls. Next day I killed two bulls that had half,an inch of back fat, and from that time on we no longer stinted ourselves on fat, although it was well towards the end of July before we began to give much of it to the dogs. This was not entirely because we were short of it but partly because we were anxious to save it for the winter. It was conceivable that ice conditions might prevent the Star’s coming, in which case we should need fat badly, both for () N July 2nd my diary records a word against the ravens and food and for winter candlelight. The first part of the winter — we would then spend in Bank’s Island and begin traveling when ~ the light should be abundant in the spring. We talked of going to Victoria Island and thence to the mainland and over to Great — Bear Lake, a country thoroughly familiar to me from my second expedition. But secretly I was hoping that when spring came we — should, even in the absence of ships, find ourselves in such spirits and so equipped that we could make a second ice journey, prefer- ably northwest from Banks Island. To spend a summer in Banks Island as we did that one was 4 i. delight. Storkerson and I knew well the tricks and methods of — living in an arctic land and Ole proved an apt pupil. The caribou grew fatter and their skins more sleek and better for clothing. We killed altogether about forty fat bulls and dried over half a ton of back fat, the equivalent of that much bacon. We lived on 242 ——_ =e oy —-~, —_— Se - ss = Ss = _ = -,;, os SS THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 243 the most palatable parts, the heads and back bones, and the dogs lived mainly on the internal organs, while we sliced thin, spread out on stones and dried in the sun for future use the hams, shoulders and other fleshy parts. Being sailors, Storkerson and Ole were both good at sewing, and they talked much about the fine clothes they were going to make from the skins for themselves and me if the ships should fail to bring Eskimo families with their incomparable seamstresses from the mainland. Like many others, I had gathered from reading polar books that fuel is hard to get in arctic lands, at least where driftwood is absent. But during my previous expedition I had learned that on the mainland of northern Canada, at least, there is excellent fuel to be found nearly everywhere, and so it proved on Banks Island. It has always been a marvel to me how the northern Indians who hunt out on the so-called “barren grounds” and the Eskimos of northern Alaska are able to grow up from childhood to maturity and old age without learning, either by accident or by the instruc- tion of some wiser people, how to use certain common plants for fuel. Readers of Frank Russell, Warburton Pike, Caspar Whitney, and others know how the northern Indians load up their sleds with dry spruce wood for furtive dashes into the dreaded “barren grounds.” They use a little for cooking each day, and when in a week or so the supply is gone they expect to be on their way back and almost within reach of the spruce forests again. And if through any cir- cumstance the journey is a little long, there are tales of hardship which seems to be felt no less keenly by the Indian than by the white narrator. It was so with the Eskimos of northern Alaska. When they went inland in days antedating blue-flame kerosene stoves, they used to take with them driftwood from the coast, or seal or whale oil to burn in their stone stoves or lamps. If they ran out of these they used to dig in the snow for willows, being thus a stage in advance of the northern Indian in resourcefulness in the open country. But if no willows were to be found and the seal oil ran out, they hurried back to the coast without a fire. This in spite of the fact that most or all coast tribes in Alaska knew that there were other Eskimo tribes in the interior—the inland Otur- kagmiut and their neighbors—who had the art of finding fuel other than willows in the open country wherever they went. The Macken- zie River Eskimos to the eastward are completely ignorant of how to find fuel in the open country even in summer, except willows. But the Eskimos of Coronation Gulf and east all the way to Hud- 244 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC son’s Bay find no difficulty in securing it in winter or summer, al- though their country is not nearly so well supplied with fuel plants as is the southerly “barren ground” into which the Dog-ribs and Yellowknives make their furtive dashes, or the northern portion of Alaska where the Point Barrow Eskimos experience fuel scarcity. The summer of 1910 I was living with three western Eskimo companions among the Eskimos of Coronation Gulf. When after a day’s march across the prairie we camped in the evening, my three Eskimos used to scatter and go sometimes a mile in search - of small willows which they would gather with great difficulty into bags and bring home on their backs. Before this willow gathering was done our local Eskimo traveling companions would have their own supper cooked and ready to eat, for they used for fuel a sort of “heather,” Cassiope tetragona, which grew in many places and always in those we selected for camp sites. I pointed out the great advantage of using these plants for fuel, but conservatism is a trait that is always stronger the more ignorant the people, and my Eskimos were unwilling to listen. Their people had always traveled in this kind of country and they had always used willows. It was an application in a field other than religion of the sentiment of the well-known hymn: “ T'was good enough for father, ’twas good enough for mother.” They seemed to feel there was something essentially wrong or degraded about using a “grass” when wood was available. This same conservatism had prevented their ances- tors as long as they lived in Alaska from learning the art of “grass” burning from the Oturkagmiut. There they were in their own coun- try and public sentiment was overwhelmingly on their side, but here they were in the minority with everybody laughing at them. — They stood pat for a month, but finally gave in; and before fall we were able to cook a meal as quickly as any of the local people. This is a digression, the point being that the plant Cassiope tetragona grows abundantly in most parts of Banks Island, and that usually we were able to pick a camp site where around our camp fire, in an area no larger than the floor space of a bedroom, would be fuel enough to cook a meal. In sunshiny weather with a moderate breeze blowing I would cook with heather even were dry willow at hand, and in my experience dry willow is rare, at least of that type which is most prevalent in the northern part of the North — American mainland. There is, however, in Banks Island and the northerly islands and in rare places on the mainland another ‘“wil- low” which has roots many times as large as that part of the plant which is above ground. The roots are found dead and sticking out THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 245 on the tops of high hills, so that occasionally in summer and fre- quently when there was snow on the ground we used them in pref- erence to heather, and especially in calm weather or after a heavy rain. But no matter how soaked with water, Cassiope can easily be burned if you know the method and if there is a strong breeze fan- ning the fire and kindling enough to start the blaze. Mosquitoes, the one serious drawback of the North—far more serious in the minds of all who know than winter darkness, ex- treme cold or violent winds—were not very serious in Banks Island. For one thing the drainage is fairly good; for another, the winds blow often enough from the ocean to keep the temperature lower than mosquitoes like. Perhaps the richest hunting country known to me is the region between Great Bear Lake and Coronation Gulf, but it has the disadvantage of a plague of mosquitoes and flies. And so on the whole these months of tenting and wandering in Banks Island are the most delightful of my summer recollections from the North, though they did not come quite up to autumn and early winter just north of the arctic circle on Horton River or on the Coppermine. I feel like mentioning here that I cannot understand the psy- chology of northern travelers who employ Eskimos and Indians to do their hunting for them. I would as soon think of engaging a valet to play my golf or of going to the theatre by proxy. Not that I enjoy the killing of animals as such, but I should dislike extremely the feeling of dependence in work or play, of knowing that it hinged on the skill and good will of any one, no matter how competent, whether I should have something to eat to-morrow or whether my plans were to fail for lack of food. I do not see how any one could get much enjoyment out of living in a camp supported by hired hunters. Neither have I at the time nor in retrospect any hesi- tancy of mind when I compare the pleasures and ease of the city or the summer resort with the northern caribou hunt, whether it be in the soft air and sunshine of summer or in December’s keenest wind and snow. The one sort of pleasure is passive, receptive, enervating—you are jaded by it and the keen edge of your enjoy- ment turns dull. But the open life of him who lives by the hunt keeps indefinitely the thrill of endeavor and achievement, a thing never to be bought or secured by having others carry out for you the most elaborate or ingenious of programs. And all of es becomes even more worth while when the food and clothing of your companions depend upon the hunt, and most when your very Hives hang on success. 246 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC The first half of July we hunted from our camp on the mainland opposite Bernard Island, but in the latter half Storkerson and I made a trip into the interior, mainly for exploration but partly for hunting, leaving Ole to guard the depot on the coast. As fat is precious above all things in the Arctic and caribou fat good to eat beyond most food of any kind, we chose to kill old bulls, for they were now the fattest. It is the nature of caribou that different ages and sexes are fat at different times of the year. A compara- tive statement of their fatness is about as follows: In late November after the rutting season the old bulls are so thin that there is no trace of fat even behind their eyes, and the mar- row in their bones is like blood. At this time both the cows and the young bulls are about at their fattest, although the proportion to the total body weight is never as high as in fat old bulls. By Christmas the young bulls have lost most or all of their fat, while the cows have less but are still not thin. About this time or in January the old bulls shed their antlers and from that time take on fat, although none is discernible at first. By February or March, when the budding antlers of old bulls are six or eight inches long, the marrow im- proves and traces of fat appear behind the eyes, about the kidneys and on the brisket. The young bulls are still lean and the cows carrying their young have become considerably thinner, although they have a little back fat and considerable intestinal fat, especially caribou in the islands north of Canada where they are fatter than in most places on the mainland. By May or June the cows have lost all fat while the oldest bulls have gained enough so that their meat be- _ comes palatable. The young bulls show no perceptible change. In — July, when the cows are just beginning to fatten the old bulls have a slab of fat on their backs covering the entire body forward to the — neck, and reaching on the haunches a thickness of perhaps half an — inch or an inch. By late August or early September this fat has be- come three inches thick in extreme cases, and will weigh before dry- — ing thirty or forty pounds if the animal is large. At this time the intestinal fat is an additional ten or fifteen pounds besides the great — amount on brisket, ribs, pelvis and elsewhere; so that you have from sixty to eighty pounds of fat on an animal the dressed weight of which, when head and hoofs have been removed, is probably be- — tween 250 and 300 pounds. The cows also are moderately fat, and gain a little for the next month or two, as do the young bulls. gE From this statement the fatness of caribou is seen to depend not, as is commonly supposed, upon food and climate primarily but __ rather on the age and sex of the animal. Neither can it be the fact THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 247 as set forth by certain writers that in midsummer, which would be July or August, caribou are poor simply because of their persecu- tion by insect pests, chiefly mosquitoes and botflies. The bulls at this season are approaching their fattest, even though the cows, upon which exclusively some authorities apparently base their reasoning, happen to be very poor. Since all caribou are greatly annoyed by mosquitoes and flies, it is reasonable to assume that they would be fatter if these pests were absent, but fat they are in spite of them if age and sex are right. Another point of evidence that the thinness of caribou in sum- mer is not primarily dependent on mosquitoes is that the cycle of fatness and leanness is about the same in the most mosquito- infested parts of the mainland as in the more northerly islands of the Canadian Archipelago where mosquitoes are so rare that in one island, Lougheed Island, we saw only one mosquito all summer. But in these northerly islands the caribou fatten a few days earlier and become a little fatter in proportion to the total body weight. That a caribou may be as fat in Lougheed Island on the first of August as it would be at Great Bear Lake the middle of August is probably due to the absence of mosquitoes in Lougheed Island; for the feed, although good, does not appear to be any better in the more northerly lands. The hunting and exploring trip into the interior of Banks Island was an interesting and delightful one for Storkerson and me. Here was a beautiful country of valleys everywhere gold and white with flowers or green with grass or mingled greens and brown with grass and lichens, except some of the hill tops which were rocky and barren. These hills differed in coloring, especially as seen from a distance, not so much because of the colors of the rock as because different vegetation prevails in different kinds of soil and different lichens on different rocks. There were sparkling brooks that united into rivers of crystal clearness, flowing over gravel bottoms. When we came to a stream we usually followed along, whether for a few hundred yards or several miles, until we came to a place where the river either split into branches or widened out. Here we took the packs off our dogs, for their short legs unfitted them for keeping a pack dry while fording, and with our good Eskimo boots keeping our feet dry we would wade across, the dogs swimming behind us. Heather was most abundant, and so 248 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC were bull caribou, so that the meat we lived on and the fuel for cooking it were of the best. When we are on a hunt proper we pitch our camps on the tops of the highest and most commanding hills, for caribou are such mobile animals that one is likely to see almost as many while favorably encamped as while traveling from place to place. But this time we were not hunting primarily, so we used to camp in sheltered, sunny places beside brooks that had their banks thickly covered with heather, giving both water and fuel right at hand. I have just mentioned that the animals we were killing for fat were the oldest bull caribou we could find. People who do not know caribou and who think of them by analogy with cattle, imagine that the meat of a bull would not be especially palatable. All experienced hunters, however, Indian, Eskimo or white, know that the bulls are better eating than the cows or the calves, and the more palatable the older they are. To me the main considera- tion about meat is its flavor. The recommendation that meat is tender is the praise of a toothless generation and one addicted to such artificial cooking that we seldom get in our foods their native flavors, but rather flavors conferred on them by sauces and condi- ments. I prefer the terminology of our meat-eating ancestors whose various idioms, which we still keep though we hardly under- stand them, show that they knew meat flavors and appreciated them as hunters do. Having good teeth it is of little concern to me whether a piece of meat is tough or tender; what is important is the taste. Besides, a caribou can never be tough. No one familiar with their typical life history can believe that the meat will get tough through age, the factor which causes toughness among domestic chickens and cattle. These last under the artificial protection of domesticity may grow to any age, and polar bears and ovibos may live on by reason of their strength and habits. But caribou never live long after they are full grown. Northern wolves in books prey on fawns and yearlings, and doubtless it happens occasionally that a wolf kills a calf, but this is likely to be within twenty-four hours of the calf’s birth. A calf is certainly not many days old when he is able to run faster than his mother and faster than any other member of the herd unless possibly the yearlings. The young cows can run faster than the old cows and the young bulls faster than the old bulls, so that when a herd is fleeing from wolves it is always the oldest bulls that bring up the rear. Observers who enjoy reading chivalry into the actions of animals doubtless find instances where THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 249 their deductions are correct. JI am not in a position to say whether an old bull would by choice bring up the rear so as to expose himself to being first victim of the wolves. But I do say that he has no option, especially at the beginning of the breeding season when he is additionaily handicapped by the weight of his huge antlers and his fat. When you see a caribou that has been singled out for pursuit by wolves, it is in the first probability an old bull and in the second an old cow. Skeletons of wolf-killed animals are nearly always found to be the skeletons of these two. In any caribou country the fewness of the old bulls is surprising unless these points are understood. Even the “old” few. are never old enough to be tough. Since that trip which gave me my first familiarity with the interior of Banks Island, I have crossed it in almost every direction, winter and summer, so that were all those routes plotted on the | map it would be as if the island were covered with a spider web. We have thus made conclusive our inference on this journey, that cattle, although once numerous in Banks Island, are now either extinct or at the most represented by a few dozen animals near the north or south end, the parts we have least carefully examined. CHAPTER XXV OLE AND I GO HUNTING absent about twenty days from the coast and from Ole, who was there alone with three of the dogs, guarding our dried meat and skins. Most people would think he would have found this rather a lonesome job, and so should I had I not known him well. My first meeting with Ole was in 1912 in the spring when I was making a journey west along the north coast of Canada near the Mackenzie River. I found him in a trapping camp alone, where he told me he had been alone all winter. I remember ask- ing him then whether he did not find it lonesome. He replied that there was no reason why he should. There was always something happening; sometimes the weather would be so bad that he could not go outdoors, and being housebound constituted a sort of ad- () N our midsummer hunt into the interior Storkerson and I were venture; another day the weather was exceptionally good and then he could go out and visit his traps, sometimes finding them full and other times empty. There must be something wrong, he thought, with any one who hankered for more variety than that. But even to this was added a monthly visit from his brother who came with a fast dog team from the winter base of the Star twenty or thirty miles away, and who usually stayed two or three hours, — returning home at night. ‘And then,” Ole said, “there is scarcely — 2 month some Eskimo does not come, and sometimes they stay — overnight.” There was no affectation about this with Ole. He was always - glad to see visitors, but never lonesome between the visits. I can- not say that I ever quite understood this frame of mind, although I objectively realized it to be a fact that Ole would not mind in the least having Storkerson and me stay away a month if it suited us. The third week of our stay inland we had already been farther east and had returned to a point about twenty miles from the coast where we had killed and spread out to dry a good deal of fat caribou meat. After some discussion, we had come to the conelu- sion that polar bears were very rare if not absent on Banks Island, at least at this season, and that it might be safe to leave our food 250 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 251 supplies at the coast unprotected, bringing Ole inland to help with the hunt. I was also interested in the condition of the ice on the coast, for the coming of the Star was continually in my mind and the month of the possibility of this was almost at hand. The ice should have broken up already all along the north coast of Alaska and the three ships were, according to our best estimates, probably now in the vicinity of Herschel Island. It would not be more than a week or two till the Star could come across from the mainland to the south end of Banks Island, where in the vicinity of Cape Kellett she would await her chance to proceed north along the west coast whenever the ice should break away. The caribou were now get- ting towards their fattest and their skins had the right length of hair for clothing. It was important to hunt energetically for two or three weeks so as to have a large amount of meat and skins | ready when the Star should arrive. | So I started for Ole’s coast camp, leaving Storkerson behind occupied with the meat-drying. He might be expected occasionally to kill caribou that came near camp, but his chief task was to assemble the drying meat and cover it up at the approach of rain or of a heavy fog, to spread it out again when the sun came out or the wind began to blow, and to protect it from gulls, foxes and wolves. It was a fine day when I started towards the coast, though it soon began to rain. Walking along the level bottom lands of the river, I came upon several small bands of caribou, and as I had not previously seen any when I had not needed to kill at least one of the band, I took the opportunity to experiment and see whether these were afraid of the appearance of a man. I found they behaved about the same as caribou would on the mainland in dis- tricts where they are frequently hunted. Before I got half-way home I was soaking wet, but one accus- tomed to the Arctic does not mind that as long as he keeps moving, though it is not easy to get used to being wet in camp at night. One adapts himself to almost anything, however, and I have been told with apparent sincerity by northern Indians that they do not mind sleeping in wet clothes, even when they are so cold that they shiver. After all, the testimony of one man who is used to a hing and likes it is worth more than that of a hundred who are rot used to it and cannot imagine how they ever could find it olerable. So probably any one could get used to sleeping cold ind wet. About six miles from camp I came upon six bulls, one much 252 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC bigger and fatter than the others. A northern hunter finds it hard to let go any opportunity for securing fat, and I accordingly killed this bull. I skinned it and got a slab of back fat weighing over forty pounds, which was at least ten pounds more than a bull of the same size would have had in the best hunting country known to me on the mainland at the same time of year. The reason prob- ably was in the cool weather and in the fewness of mosquitoes, for although the feed is excellent in Banks Island, it can scarcely be considered better than on the mainland in certain places. So it was evident that the caribou had not found this summer in Banks Island disagreeable. Neither had we, although a south- — ern reader might infer the contrary from a glance at our meteoro- logical record. July 3rd, it says: “Sky overcast, snowing all day, temperature plus 28° to plus 32°.” In another place it says that a slight amount of ice formed every night during the first half of July. We liked this weather for many reasons; one being that it kept down the mosquitoes. The chief reason was, however, doubt- less subjective. This was the typical weather of the arctic fall, although in a sense unseasonable in July. When an Iowa farmer speaks of “beautiful hot weather,” he really means it, although if he were © to analyze his feelings he might realize that half the pleasure he | feels in the heat is in the thought that it is ripening his corn and fattening his pocketbook. An equally hot day may not please a — North Dakota farmer so well, for he remembers that the ground is dry and his wheat is withering. And just as the heat ripens the — corn, so does the cold July wind from the ice-covered sea fatten |), the caribou, or what amounts to the same thing, keep down the ~ mosquitoes which would keep him from fattening. So also do we |,,, like that same cold wind. § But in his exuberance of good health it is difficult for the arctic _ hunter to feel anything but pleasure in almost any kind of weather or almost any circumstance. I suppose what I am trying to ex- plain is about what the Biblical writer had in mind when he- bon spoke of a strong man rejoicing to run a race. You may find in some i: volume of the scientific report of our expedition that during a cer- },.- tain summer it snowed in every week but you should not infer it was bad weather in the sense that it made us uncomfortable. And — it would not have made any one else uncomfortable either, if he had — been dressed and housed and fed as we were, with the same years of training and experience behind him, the same sound health and the same infatuation with the work. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 253 After cutting up my caribou and—with the gulls in mind— hiding the fat underneath the meat, I proceeded to the coast. Ole was waiting, happy as always and full of stories of his adventures while I had been gone. Most of these, as he told them, centered around wolves. It seemed that a pair of them, peculiarly sportive and mischievous; had been in the habit of coming near camp and getting the dogs excited, with a view of enticing them away. One day the dogs succeeded in breaking loose at both ends the long line by which all were tethered to two sticks. Dragging this line they gave chase to the wolves, Ole following. They were impeded by the weight of the rope and by getting tangled in it so that he was almost able to keep up. He fired several shots at the wolves, that _ tantalizingly were keeping just ahead of the dogs. This did not scare them. Of course he had little chance of hitting them, for he was out of breath. After a chase of several miles the dogs got | finally so tangled in the line that Ole caught up with them. | A year later I discovered that while this story was literally true, it had been told me with added emphasis and detail to appease any suspicions on the score of Ole’s considerable expenditure of ammunition while I was away. Early in July we had taken an ammunition inventory, finding that we had 109 rounds for the Mannlicher and 157 for the Winchester rifle. This was not a great deal even with the most careful shooting, for there was no guaran- tee that any of our ships would get to us during the summer, in which case this ammunition had to secure food for us for all of ‘the coming winter and would have to take us east across Banks Island and across Prince of Wales Straits, then south along Victoria Island, across Dolphin and Union Straits to the mainland and j\across several hundred miles of mainland, probably to Bear Lake and to the Hudson’s Bay Company’s post at Fort Norman on the Mackenzie River. When we are stationary it is possible to aver- age better than 125 pounds of meat to each cartridge, but in making rapid journeys it is not possible to be so economical, for when a heavy animal is killed only a part of the meat can be hauled along, pausing a good deal of waste and bringing down the average meat equivalent of the ammunition. So Ole knew I put a high value on ‘he ammunition; nor could his own estimate of its value have dif- ‘ered much from mine, for he saw equally our dependence on it for ‘comfort and safety. Now I have mentioned that the day we landed, while I was away ‘etting the first caribou killed, Storkerson and Ole had eaten the ast of the food we brought ashore and had discussed the probable 254 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC delectability of the island geese, and the harshness of my rule that no ammunition must be spent on birds. It appears that ever after that Ole’s mouth kept watering for the geese he had not tasted. Part of his contentment at being left alone when we went inland had been due, he confessed to Storkerson some months afterwards, to his lively anticipation of eating at least one fat goose while we were gone. Accordingly, we were scarcely out of sight when he got his rifle, sneaked around to a neighboring pond and killed a goose. But geese are small targets and it is not easy to get close to them, so that he wasted half a dozen bullets before he got the first one. Hence the necessity of impressing me, in case I should audit the ammunition account, with the large number of cartridges necessary to kill or scare the wolves that had been enticing our dogs away. But what annoyed Ole most was that the goose when he came to eat it did not taste as good as the caribou he had been living on. While still of the firm opinion that caribou meat was “all right if you had nothing else” and that many kinds of meat, such as goose, were better and especially desirable ‘for a change,” he had in reality become so accustomed to caribou in a month, and his tongue if not his mind had been so thoroughly converted to it, that the flavor of goose did not prove half as agreeable. He told Stork- erson that if he had followed his inclination he would have eaten only a part of the goose, giving the rest to any dog that might have wanted it, but he decided to punish himself for the wasted ammu- nition by abstaining from caribou till the goose was eaten. Any ammunition he spent thereafter during our absence was fired at wolves. Ole had been studying the tides, partly because of our scientific — interest in them and partly because the sea ice that has been land- — fast during the winter “goes abroad” only when there is a high tide such that the ice is first lifted off the sea bottom by it and then — pushed away from land by the wind. Ole had found that in Banks Island, as on the north coast of Alaska, there is a “low tide” with east winds, and a “high tide” with west winds. But what he had noticed in addition was that here the lowest water was brought about by a north wind. This was well exemplified the day I got home, for it was then blowing stiffly from the north and the water was six inches lower than it had been during our absence or at any time since we began to observe its height by sticks planted at the beach. This was not encouraging, for the winds that might be ex- pected to take the ice off could not easily do so because of the heavy grounding of the ice at low tide, while the high water that lifted it off THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 255 the bottom would be accompanied by a wind that shoved it on the land. What we would have to hope for would be first a west wind, raising the water level, and then a sudden shift of wind through south to east before the water had time to fall, a sequence of cir- cumstances that might not occur in a whole summer. After a day at the camp we started back towards Storkerson’s hunting place, leaving all our dried meat and skins on an elevated platform high enough to escape wolves and foxes, although unpro- tected against polar bears. When we got to where I had killed the fat bull two days before we found that foxes and gulls had eaten about a third of the meat and about half the fat. The gulls alone would not have had the ingenuity to get at the fat where I had hidden it, but the foxes had pulled the concealing meat away. It happened that I was able to kill that evening another fat bull a few hundred yards from the same place, to make up for the loss. White foxes were spending the summer in Banks Island in large numbers, but we lost surprisingly little meat by their thieving. Often they seemed even contemptuous in the way they passed it by untouched. This was probably because they were so well fed with eggs, young birds and lemmings. When we got back to Storkerson we found that he had been bothered by wolves much as Ole had been. Some of our meat was at his camp but a considerable part of it was still out in the field, where several caribou had been killed, cut up and their meat spread out to dry to make it lighter for carrying home, only the fat being mmediately taken to camp. Our experience with foxes and gulls iad been that they were not very destructive of the meat, but now hat wolves were about much of it was lost. Wolves had been few during our first month and their appear- ince now was probably connected with the approach of the cow aribou. So far we had seen large bulls chiefly—very few cows and ew small bulls. Now small bulls and cows became numerous, pparently coming from the north or northeast. This did not mean hat caribou became as numerous as on the mainland, for we never aw more than twenty or thirty aday. Ihave seen a band of about wo hundred in Banks Island, but several years’ experience shows iat bands of two hundred are as rare in Banks Island as bands f two thousand on the mainland north of Great Bear Lake. In immer there are probably not more than two or three thousand ribou in the whole island, with perhaps a few more in winter iat come from Victoria Island to the east. Partly to explore further and partly to give Ole a chance to 256 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC see as much of the country as Storkerson had seen, he and I now made a hunting trip eastward from Storkerson’s camp, a distance of about twenty miles. We found a_ beautiful country of rolling hills with small lakes and again an abundance of heather. I re- member particularly one camping place in the bottom-lands of a small river where we pitched our tent on hard, level ground a few yards from a stream of the best water in the world, amid so much heather that we agreed that on ten acres of ground in a week or so we could have picked enough fuel to last the winter. Everywhere the Eskimos had preceded us, although apparently none had been there in ten years. We formed the opinion that few of the relics were very old, probably none over a century. There were “tent rings,” or circles of stones that had been used to hold down the flaps of a tent and had been rolled away when camp had been broken, giving a somewhat enlarged outline where the tent had stood. The Victoria Island Eskimos nowadays occasion- ally made a wall of sod from eight to twenty inches high as the base of their tents. Walls of this kind are found here and there over Banks Island, although not numerous. The tent rings are in places naturally suited to them—occasionally on hilltops and more frequently in lower places where there are ‘“‘nigger heads,” the little knobs one can take hold of and break loose with the hands, getting round pieces of sod varying in size from a grapefruit to a pumpkin. Of these the Eskimos had built the sod foundations for their tents, and we used them occasionally for the erection of beacons. Near many of the camp sites were shavings and small pieces of wood. In at least three cases out of four these had been brought from Mercy Bay, for they were fragments of barrel staves, painted boards, or other parts of a ship or of the equipment of a ship. This was confirmation of the accounts of McClure, sixty years before, who saw no Eskimos at all on Banks Island, from which he ap- pears to have thought that there were none and from which we now infer that they certainly cannot have been numerous. It was also confirmation of stories told me by the Prince Albert Sound Eskimos in 1911 and later, to the effect that there had been a great influx of people into Banks Island following the discovery by some of their number of McClure’s abandoned ship, the Investigator, in Mercy Bay, probably about 1855.* Often the Eskimo camp sites were in the vicinity of ovibos kill- ings. Sometimes these kills seem to have been what we may call *See “My Life With the Eskimo,” p. 293, and elsewhere. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 257 legitimate. The camp sites show heads and other bones that are the remains of animals actually used for food. This can be seen by the fact that the heads have been partly cut up for cooking, some of the horns have been removed to make utensils, the bones have been broken for marrow and many of them gnawed by dogs, and sometimes there is evidence that the bones were pounded up and boiled to secure the last bit of fat from them. But in some cases it is only too clear that big herds were wantonly slaughtered. We have found groups of over twenty skeletons lying a few yards from each other. Such a slaugh- tering place has always borne some indication that a small part at least of the meat was used, and still it is not easy to be clear on this point, for the absent brisket bones and ribs, the parts Eskimos prefer for food, are also the parts most easily chewed up by wolves. That the bones of the foreleg, often found at a distance from the rest of the skeleton, were in some cases not found at all, is hardly an indication that an Eskimo carried the forequarters away. The foreleg is not a preferred piece of meat; and again, wolves in devouring a caribou or polar ox will eat the meat away in such fashion that the shoulder-blade comes loose from the body, so that the foreleg bones can be dragged away. When Eskimos kill a band of cattle it will depend entirely on circumstances whether they stop beside the kill and remain till the animals have been eaten up, or whether they pass on, taking with them nothing or nothing but fat. We cannot assume that they would by analogy with the early buffalo hunters kill the animals for the tongues. Eskimos may kill for fat or kill for skins or for both combined, but they never kill for the tongues. They may, however, kill for no purpose at all, and leave their victims to be eaten by predatory animals. Our wanderings in Banks Island, both this summer and summers following, never disclosed any Eskimo burial place, or any imple- ments or other artifacts that seem to have been deposited with the dead. We did find two or three skulls and some odd bones, though none of these seemed to be the remains of a real burial. Either such burial places as there are escaped us, or else no true burials — have been made. It is possible, in other words, that the Eskimos who moved about the island did not have the burial customs of the mainland Eskimos, and left their dead behind, unprotected by stones or otherwise, to be devoured by the first animals that came along. In fact we know that the Eskimos of Coronation Gulf, sometimes, at least, merely wrap the body in skins and leave it on 258 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC the ground. These are near relatives of the people who came to Banks Island to plunder the Investigator, and it may be that the bodies of such people as died were similarly left. Ole’s journey and mine was for pleasure and to pick up such incidental information as came in our way. We traveled so light that our three pack dogs were able to carry everything, and we wandered from hilltop to hilltop, enjoying the scenery, examining the ancient camp sites and killing a fat caribou whenever necessary. This combined the freedom from care of a picnic with the fascina- tion of exploration, for, except for Storkerson’s excursion and mine some weeks earlier we were the first white men who had been in the interior of Banks Island. On the southwest side the American whalers are known to have made two landings but they never went beyond the beach, and the Eskimos whom they sent ashore to hunt did not go over four or five miles inland, for I have talked with them about it. It does not appear from McClure’s records that in the two years which he spent at the Bay of Mercy on the north- east side of the island any of his men made journeys into the interior. Since I began to know the North its beauty, freedom and friend- liness have continually grown upon me. They were there from the first but my eyes were holden and I could not see them, for even in that clear air I walked wrapped in the haze of my bringing-up. With southern feelings and an assumption of the inferiority of that which is different, I failed to see the resources and values where they lay before me, and distrusted everything that was strange. Especially on such delightful and care-free journeys as we were now making it is difficult to realize that this land is not only assumed to be barren by those who do not know it, but has actually appeared so to men who have been there. Certainly it would take keen eyes to read between the lines of McClure’s narrative of hard- ship and heroism the soft beauty and homelikeness of Banks Island as I see it. When we had wandered around until we thought Storkerson might be getting lonesome, for he was unlike Ole, not used to living alone, we made our way back and found him and everything well, except that he was a little stiff from lying around the house in idle- ness. The trouble had been that he could not very well leave camp because of the hovering wolves. So long as a man is present a camp is in no danger from them, but unguarded it is at their mercy, whether there are dogs or not. For one thing, the dogs would not have the sense to stay in the camp and attempt to guard it, but A Tent Rina. Seale eee Race as ia BrokeN Summer Ice Atonc THE Coast. iat . ee 2g - Se = AO LON aino0D ding 4 DUT] V NOI A\ UGLV A TUOHY FHL MOTIOT TINO 4078 Yq40N AE, FR ket 55. = THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 259 would probably give chase to the wolves, and in a fight there could be no doubt of the outcome. The dogs were about the same size as wolves, weighing up to 130 pounds, but they had neither their swiftness of foot nor their cunning. Wolves would not allow them- selves to be overtaken unless they were numerous enough to get the best of the fight. To show what was most in our minds all through August, I quote my diary for the first day of that month: “This is probably the month of keenest expectations of all I have spent in the North. It is the season of navigation and our three small ships should be, with luck, as far east now as Cape Bathurst. The Star coming direct may arrive here any day the ice leaves the beach. She should reach Kellett in a few days from now and wait her chance there te proceed north. The Sachs should complete her errand accompanying Anderson to Liston Island and be at Kellett, too, soon after August 10th. The Alaska almost cer- tainly will have little trouble in reaching Cape Bexley if once she gets to Herschel Island. Even the Karluk may be heard from. There is nothing in the present or future I would not give to be aboard of her, and few things I would not give for news of her— nothing I would not pay for her safety, or rather that of her men. The vessel herself would not so much matter if nothing but hopes, plans and equipment went down with her.” On our inland journey Ole and I had watched the weather, pre- pared to make rapidly for the coast should the wind lead us to think the ice might leave. The camp where we rejoined Storkerson was on a hill so high and commanding that although fifteen miles inland it allowed through glasses a view of the ice along the coast and around Bernard and Norway Islands. Now we spent much of every day scrutinizing the coast, watch- ing the gradually widening lane of shore water between the main- land and the grounded sea ice that was being melted by the warm water pouring from the land. It was one of the virtues of the Star that on account of her shallow draft she would be able to work her way up along this lane of thaw water even before the ice offshore broke up and was carried to sea by the wind. Once or twice near the middle of the month there was a slight shifting of the ice but the tide fell and grounded it again. But towards the close it became clear that although there was a ribbon of ice in the middle distance the ocean outside was clear. Strong winds blew from the east day after day, making it evident that no floating ice could be near, although the fogs that always hang to seaward when 260 ‘ THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC a land wind is blowing prevented us from seeing beyond the limits of the grounded ice. On the southwest coast of Banks Island between Nelson Head and Cape Kellett there is deep water inshore, and even in winter the ice is carried away from the land by any offshore wind. But north of Kellett there is a shelf of shallow water along the land that grows wider as you go north until towards the middle of Banks Island it is twelve or fifteen miles wide. In the vicinity of Norway Island the shelf becomes that much broader, so that it extends fif- teen or more miles beyond. On all this shelf there was the grounded ice that we speak of as “landfast.”” The Star might even make her way north between it and the land, but we knew that any ship could sail north outside of it. Towards the end of August navigation conditions had become so good that we began to despair of the Star’s coming. It seemed then that only shipwreck or some condition almost equally serious other than that of ice must be keeping her away. I really made up my mind to this about the 18th of August and we were about to start south along the west coast, thinking she might be wrecked some- where between us and Kellett, when we had an unaccountable change of heart and decided to wait another week. By the 27th there was no use waiting further, so we dug a huge pit in the earth, lined it with stones, filled it with stores of dried meat, caribou tallow and caribou skins, and covered it with stones which would secure it from any animal except a polar bear. Not having seen a single bear since landing, we thought the cache might prove safe till we came back for it. Now the plan was to follow the coast south to Kellett, searching every bay for the Star or possible traces of her. If none were found we would return to our cache and stay through early winter until the ample daylight of February or early March. We talked about starting then for the mainland, going first east into Victoria Island, then south through the country so well known to me from my previous expedition, across Coronation Gulf to Bear Lake. Privately I had in my mind the hope that we might get through the winter so well that my companions would in the spring be will- ing to make a second ice exploration, in which case the calculation would be to get to the mainland in May or June. We started along the coast southward on September 1st. The method of travel was that Storkerson and Ole followed behind with the camp equipment and food for three or four days, carried mostly by the dogs, although the men carried the bulkiest bedding. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 261 In the morning after breakfast while they were arranging the dog packs and making ready for the march, I would start out with the aim of keeping three or four miles ahead of them all day. I trav- eled from hilltop to hilltop making little temporary monuments and leaving messages for them in case I had seen through my glasses anything on the basis of which any plan ought to be changed. It might be that I could see a bay running inland ahead of us, and my message would give warning and direct the course. Or I might see game, in which event the note would tell them whether to wait and watch until they saw the outcome of my hunting, or to make camp at some specified spot, or perhaps to go ahead to some other hill from which they could watch the hunting operations better. For several days no game was seen, nor were we in need of any, for we had started with dried meat enough for five or six days. I was able to travel much faster than the others, for heavily laden pack dogs will walk only about a mile and a half an hour. When no hunting was on I did such things as sketch an outline of the coast. Now and then I went down to the beach, following it for a mile or two at a time and sticking up on end any small pieces of driftwood found, the idea being that they would thus be more easily discoverable above the snow next winter should we have occasion to follow the coast by sled. The Admiralty chart proved rather inaccurate, as it had been made on the basis of observations from McClure’s ship sailing along several miles from the land on its way north in 1851. Inves- tigations since made at my request by the Royal Geographical Society indicate that some of this map was based not on any survey or sketches made at the time, but on log book entries, narratives, or possibly even the memoirs of men who were on the journey. Noth- ing more than a very general correspondence between the facts and such a map can be expected There are several islands along the coast although only one, Terror Island, is shown on McClure’s chart. On the map the coast- line is undulating, without deep bays or harbors; on the real land there are many deep bays and many harbors, if their entrances prove adequate when sounded. I am inclined to think, from the evidence of driftwood on the beach, that during the last short while, geologically speaking, the coast has been rising; but that before that there must have been a long period of considerable subsidence and there are, accordingly, long arms of the sea stretching inland through “drowned” valleys. Relying on the map, we tried for the first few days to follow the coast pretty closely, thinking there 262 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC would be no deep bays or hindrances to travel, but we lost so much time this way that later we traveled on an average five miles away from the coast. Even then we would come occasionally to what we expected to be a creek, and which had all the winding characteristics of a creek, but was an arm of the sea reaching in some cases six or eight miles inland. About half-way to Cape Kellett I had a curious experience with a band of caribou. Each of several times I got near them they were ~unaccountably scared away. This puzzled me, when the explana- tion appeared in a polar bear. I don’t know exactly what he was doing. Part of the time he was probably following me, part of the time he may have been preparing to hunt caribou on his own account, and eventually he was fleeing from me after having got my wind. But in each case he succeeded equally in scaring the caribou. When I finally noticed the bear I tried to get him, but he was aware of me and made off without stopping. The caribou that time ran into my companions and the dogs, which excited the dogs to loud barking and scared them again. To make matters worse, Storkerson did not realize that I was following the caribou and started following them on his own account, which scared them once more. There was nothing to do now they were so thoroughly frightened but to wait for hours until they had not only run a distance of several miles but had had time to quiet down and more or less forget. They finally stopped on some rather flat land, and approaching them was a tedious matter, entailing a great deal of crawling and a great deal of waiting in strategic positions for them either to move closer to me or else to move over a hill so that I could resume my devious approach, for this was the last day of our dried meat and we had to get something to eat. I eventually shot four, after hav- ing used up nearly a whole day. This was more meat than we needed, but game had been so scarce on the way south that I thought it best to kill enough for a depot for the return journey. So we dug a hole in the ground, lined it with stones as usual, and filled it with meat that had first been properly chilled. Part of the land traversed in the last several days had been sandy, and “heather” does not grow well on sandy soil, or rather, what grows there does not burn well. But it is one of the compen- sations of the Arctic that the same sandy soil that makes the heather unsuited for fuel seems especially adapted to a certain kind of willow, the dead and bleaching roots of which we always found THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 263 in these sandy districts in sufficient quantity for cooking. Once or twice we descended to the seacoast for our evening camp and were able to find driftwood. About the middle of the west coast of Banks Island the Ad- miralty chart indicates Terror Island, a conspicuous little island which we found in its proper latitude. But just north of it the chart shows a straight coast line, and here we found a great bay about fifteen miles across and running fifteen miles or more into the land. I have named it Storkerson Bay in honor of the man who did more than any other member of the expedition towards the suecess of its geographic work. South of Storkerson Bay the amount of driftwood on the coast increased rapidly and in one bay a little to the south there must have been several cords of wood to one mile of beach. This would be little for the mainland coast near the Mackenzie delta, where there are thousands of cords to the mile in some places, but it is more driftwood than we found anywhere else on Banks Island. Towards evening on September 10th I climbed a commanding hill and recognized that a few miles south lay the sandspit of Cape Kellett. Except for Point Barrow at the north tip of Alaska, this is the greatest sandspit known to me in the Arctic. It is shaped about like a fish-hook. It first runs four or five miles west from the southwest corner of the land proper and then it bends gradually northwest, north, northeast, east and southeast in a two-mile curve, forming what looks like a safe harbor, although it has an unsafe entrance because of shoals, is swept with currents carrying ice at certain seasons, and is not a safe harbor at all. The recognition of the indubitable outline of Cape Kellett was followed by a quarter of an hour of suspense while my glasses searched all the vicinity from the hilltop, first hastily for the pos- sible presence of a ship, and later minutely for a beacon or other sign that some one had been there who had an interest in us. Nothing could be seen that resembled any work of man. I felt truly depressed as I went about the erection of a beacon for the guidance of my companions who were four or five miles behind. It happened that on top of this hill there were some “nigger heads” scattered about, which, as we have explained, is the material used by Eskimos in building the foundations for their summer camps. Because that material was abundant, I erected in half an hour a beacon that could be seen with the naked eye from five or six miles. I left in it a note saying nothing about disap- 264 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC pointment, for I knew my companions capable of inferring that for themselves. It said merely, ‘‘Make camp on the coast half a mile southwest of here.” Then I walked east along a ridge of hills half a mile, for our meat supply was again beginning to run low and it was time to get another caribou, and I had further a vague plan of remaining at the Cape for three or four days. From the end of the ridge I had a view over a beautiful valley running eastward, with great stretches of flat bottom lands and rolling grassy hills on either side. On a hilltop eight or ten miles to the northeast were some caribou. too far away for present need but giving assurance that, should we decide to stay in the vicinity, we were likely to find food here no less than elsewhere. On my return to camp I found the gloom I had expected. We had all felt fairly certain of finding at least some beacon at Cape Kellett. There was the hope of our own ships. Also Mr. Mott of the Polar Bear had said to me that in the event of my ships dis- obeying orders and not coming to Banks Island, which he antici- pated more strongly than I through his association with the expe- dition during the winter, he would leave a depot for me at Kellett. We had even agreed what it was to be—one or two rifles with am- munition to fit, some kerosene with two or three blue-flame kero- sene stoves, a tent and possibly some clothes, and a little of some kind of food least likely to be destroyed by bears. The food part I had told him was of small importance, but I now felt keenly how convenient it would have been to find rifles, ammunition, oil, and the like. But the moral effect of the slightest evidence that we had _ not been forgotten would have been greater than the physical value of any supplies we could have found. It is scarcely possible for healthy men living in the open air to remain despondent long. After an hour or two of gloom I began to see various romantic possibilities in the situation and launched upon a sermon to my companions on the text that the most precious use of adversity is its stimulus. I pointed out that the greater the obstacle the greater the achievement, with various other plati- tudes I have now forgotten. While we lacked many things we could have made use of, we nevertheless had resources enough not only to pass the winter safely but to make an exploratory journey in the spring, if it were nothing more than to cross to Victoria Island and finish the mapping of it between the farthest points attained by the expeditions of McClure and of Amundsen. Thus we should accomplish useful geographic work and knock in the head, if we THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 265 had not already done so, the idea that ships and supplies are needed to pass an arctic winter safely and comfortably. There would soon be on the ground plenty of snow for the building of clean and cozy houses, and we still had over 200 cartridges, which meant 20,000 pounds of fat for fuel and meat for food. But Storkerson had a family on the mainland, and Ole had plans for a trading expedition involving the purchase of a ship and the acquiring of wealth on the coast of Siberia. While they agreed with me that we could pass the winter and continue the work in the spring, they did not agree with me that the game was worth the candle, and reminded me that I had promised them when we were out on the ice that if no ship came to Banks Island we would make our way to the mainland as soon as the winter frosts should bridge over the arms of the sea we had to cross, and as soon as the increas- ing daylight of spring allowed safe travel. CHAPTER XXVI WE DISCOVER THE MARY SACHS few miles beyond it before giving up finally the hope of find- ing ship, beacon, or message. As usual, I started off ahead. When I had gone a mile and a half I saw in the soft mud on the bank of a little creek a nearly fresh human footprint. I had scarcely realized its meaning when my mind went back with some irony to the previous evening and to the moral value of the decision we had failed to make. Had we taken a bold concerted stand to continue for another year on the resources we had, we could have been proud ever after of a “heroic” resolve, without having had the bother of carrying it out. For this footprint meant that somewhere in the vicinity resources of one kind or another were awaiting us. I was near enough to the camp to be able to wave a signal. And then I did not stop to write a note but merely raised a stone on end, for I knew the footprint itself would carry as much of a message to Storkerson and Ole as it did to me. To me it was one of the gladdest sights of my life. That it was the imprint of a heeled boot meant white men. Half a mile farther south I came upon a second track. This showed cross-hatching on the sole—the sort of rubber boot privately owned by some of the members of our scientific staff. This increased the probability that whoever had been here, it was one of our ships that brought him. At first I had thought it most likely to have been the Polar Bear party who had promised to come if our ships failed. Three miles farther on, where the sandspit of Cape Kellett joins the mainland proper, I found no signs though I looked carefully. “But a mile or more east along the coast,” to quote verbatim from the diary for September 11th, “I got to the top of a hill from which I saw the tips of two masts. I could hardly believe my eyes—some- how it seemed unnatural to find a ship in Banks Island where it ought to be.” I ran forward, for the first thing that occurred to me was that the ship was at anchor and might start away. Half a mile of run- 266 N EXT morning we decided to go down to the Cape itself and a THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 267 ning brought me in fuil view of the beach, and to my surprise and consternation I recognized that there was the Sachs hauled up on the land, her cargo unloaded and a number of her men building a house. And now I walked slowly to get my breath back, puzzling what could have happened to the Star that she had not come and why the Sachs was on the land instead of afloat. Obviously, there had been no shipwreck. Everything was too trim and orderly for that. As I approached, the men at work glanced in my direction occa- sionally but were apparently not impressed with anything peculiar in my appearance. This I understood. It meant that some of the party were off hunting and that they imagined me to be one of their own people coming home. As I got nearer [ recognized Jim Crawford carrying sod. From the time I was 200 yards from the camp till I was fifty yards from it, Captain Bernard was in full sight and glanced occasionally at me. Then he turned his back on me and walked slowly away towards the ship. I was no more than ten or fifteen yards from Crawford when he looked up for the third or fourth time and at last recognized that I was not one of his own party. I have forgotten what it was he had in his hands just then, but he dropped it. He has told me since that he first thought I was one of their own hunters. When he saw that I was not, his impression was a confused sort of astonishment, for he thought I must be an Eskimo and still he could not see what kind of Eskimo I could be. He had heard that the Victoria Island Eskimos were different from the Eskimos he knew in Alaska, but he had also seen specimens of the Victoria Island clothing and my clothes were of the Alaska type. Furthermore, he knew they had only bows and arrows, and I was carrying a gun. The contra- diction of everything he expected confused him hopelessly. It was not until I spoke to him and told him who I was that he recog- nized me. Even then he stood still and speechless in a daze. A few seconds later the company became as excited, however, as any one could have desired, for when Crawford finally realized who [ was, he turned and shouted to Bernard: ‘‘Stefansson is alive! He’s here!” ' This announcement carried greater conviction to Bernard when | pronounced by Crawford than my statement of who I was had carried to Crawford when pronounced by myself. The rest of the party were around me in a moment. But it naturally took some _time before I for my part began to realize under what circum- | stances they were there and before they had adjusted themselves 268 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC to the fact of my presence. I had expected them to be more pleased than surprised when they recognized me, and certainly I had not expected the kind of surprise I found. I thought they had come there to meget me and that they would be delighted once the meeting had taken place. On that theory I could not interpret their be- havior, although it was easily understandable when I realized that they had come there with no idea of my being alive at all but merely governed by a blind devotion to the orders of a man now dead. After a few words of explanation from me, indicating that Storkerson and Ole were coming behind, Crawford and Thomsen set out to meet them, while Bernard took me into a tent, insisting that I must eat. Somehow his first clear notion after he realized that I was alive was the assumption that I must be starving. I stopped him at that point and insisted on his looking closely at me and seeing for himself that I was fatter and in better condition than he had ever seen me before. He admitted it presently, but insisted that I must, nevertheless, be craving “good grub.” The Captain was a great coffee drinker and could not understand how anybody could go months without coffee. Bread, too, he consid- ered a necessity of life, and fruits and various other articles of food he supposed to be by their nature such that no one could be healthy without them. He thought that any one deprived of these things for months would long for them with a craving indescrib- able. I tried to explain to the Captain that while I was hungry for news I had very little appetite for his food, but I soon found that it was easiest to accept a mug of coffee and some bread and butter and commence nibbling and sipping. My doing so put the Captain at his ease and he began to tell me the things I most wanted to know. He had hardly started when the one member of the company who had not been present at my arrival entered the door. This was my old friend, W. J. Baur, whom I had known since 1906 under the name of ‘‘Levi,” though he is no Hebrew by blood nor has he any trait supposed to be characteristically Jewish. I had seen Levi last when he had come from the Belvedere to bid us good-by when we started out on the ice from Martin Point, and here he was now steward of the Sachs and at the moment returned from a successful duck hunt, with a shotgun in one hand and two or three birds in the other. He was familiar with the “blond Eskimos;” in fact, he had wintered among them in 1908 on the second whaling ship to visit them, and that was two years before I saw them and On ArrRIvaL AT KELLETT. Storker Storkerson. Ole Andreasen. UasMIOY, ‘SIP - WOSIaYIOYG ‘sIJ] TWasuIOYT, Ineg PIOJMBID pavuiog RISNyYE NT ‘MIATIGY, TdVO LV ASMOHGOG AHL ONIATING THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 269 four years before they became the delight of newspaper readers. He has told me since that his first thought was that here was one of the blond Eskimos, but his second thought was that he’d be damned if he knew who or what I was. He was no farther along in his thinking process when Captain Bernard said, “Don’t you see it’s the Commander?” It is seldom in real life that people “register” astonishment, or any other feeling in a way at all resembling the movies, but I have never seen nor can I imagine better movie acting than Levi’s aston- ishment. He had already put the gun aside, otherwise he would have dropped it; but the ducks in his hand he actually dropped on the floor. After staring at me he almost collapsed upon a bench without saying a word. I have heard of people’s eyes “sticking out of their heads” with fear or surprise. Without saying that Levi’s actually did, I will say it seemed to me they did. There was a special reason for Levi’s being rather more startled than the others. He had been on the expedition their guide and philosopher as to all northern things. He had been a whaler around Herschel Island and in various parts of the Arctic for twenty years and was looked up to by members of the Sachs party as wise beyond any of them. They all knew, each on his own account, that my companions and I must be dead; but even at that, Levi had taken frequent occasion to explain and enlarge upon the certainty. He was in truth, as he said himself, an old friend of mine; but he had seen no reason why affection or any weakness should blind him to facts. In addition to explaining that it was not possible we could ever have reached Banks Island alive, he had also ex- plained that we could not have lived there even had we been able to land. He had warned that it was “all storybook stuff” about any white man being able to live in the Arctic, and especially on Banks Island, without help from Eskimos. Even the Eskimos could not live on Banks Island, for had he not himself years before seen traces of them there and were they not absent now, and had they not always been absent when anybody came to the island? These Eskimos had come on a furtive visit from another island (Victoria Island) and had not stayed because the country was a difficult one even for them. Of course this was ordinary whaler lore, partly intuition and partly picked up from the Alaska Eskimos whom they carry in _ their crews; but it amounted to a body of truth with Levi and the crew of the Sachs, with the partial exception of Wilkins, as we | shall see later. But the broadest-minded scientist was never more 270 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC willing to accept the verdict of facts against a theory than was Levi, so obviously glad was he to have been wrong at the price of finding us alive. The first thing I asked Captain Bernard for was a list of those who had come with the Sachs to Banks Island. They were George Wilkins, in command; Peter Bernard, sailing master; James R. Crawford, engineer; W. J. (“Levi”) Baur, steward; Charles (really Karl) Thomsen; Natkusiak; Mrs. 8. T. Storkerson with her daugh- ter Martina; and Mrs. Charles Thomsen with her daughter Annie. Martina was about five years old and Annie about three. When I found Levi here in place of Andre Norem, there flew to my mind Norem’s fears for his own sanity and I asked about him. Bernard’s reply was brief, I remember it almost word for word still: “Poor Norem. He was a fine fellow. I had known him for years and so it was no credit to me that I believed him when he told me his mind was going. I could see the signs plainer than he could. But there were still one or two men left at Collinson Point who thought he was shamming, when one morning he shot himself in the alleyway outside our door and was dead before any one got to him.” This was the first tragedy ot our expedition to come to my ears. I now turned my inquiry to what had been an anxious burden on my mind. There was reassuring news of the Karluk. Some whal- ing ships had reached Herschel Island, the Captain said, before the Sachs left there and had reported that the Karluk was crushed by the ice sixty miles northeast of Wrangel Island in January, 1914, and that all of her men had made their way safely ashore in Wrangel Island; that Captain Bartlett had left them there and with one Eskimo companion had crossed the hundred miles of ice to the mainland of Siberia, had traveled along the coast from house to house until he met Baron Kleist, a Russian official, who had taken him to Emma Harbor, where Captain Theodore Pedersen * of the Herman had picked him up, carrying him to St. Michaels. From there the news was sent to the Government and to the press. The United States was said to have detailed two revenue cutters, the Bear and the Thetis, to pick the men up in Wrangel Island, and the Russian government two ice breakers, the Taimyr and the Vaigatch, for the same service. There seemed to be no doubt that while the ship was Tost to our expedition, her company of men were safe. * Captain Pedersen is Theodore among his friends; he is in this book some- times referred to by his legally correct name of C, T. Pedersen. THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 271 This piece of news set my mind at rest; the reported outcome was exactly according to my expectations. I had said in my re- ports to the Government that while the ship had no more than an even chance of surviving I did not see any reason to think that any of her men would be lost if she were crushed in the ice in winter and especially if she were crushed after the New Year, when the daylight was increasing and the conditions were ideal for getting ashore. The only thing that surprised me was that the men should have been left on Wrangel Island. It appeared to me that they should have walked ashore at the same time that Captain Bartlett did, for it is well known that that coast is thickly settled with people who have an abundance of native food in addition to stores of groceries brought in by traders and could care adequately for al- most any number of shipwrecked men that might arrive. A hun- dred miles over ordinary arctic sea ice is not far to walk. I have here given the news as reported to me by Captain Ber- nard, and the feeling I then had about the news. It was to develop later that the news itself was in part incorrect. I next asked why the Star had failed to come to Banks Island. To this Captain Bernard replied that everyone in Alaska, Eskimos, whalers and members of our expedition alike, had been sure of our death. He said Dr. Anderson had not taken him into his confidence, but he thought our supposed death might have been the reason why he had decided not to follow my instructions about the Star and had taken her himself to Coronation Gulf. I asked if Dr. Anderson had sent me any message on the chance of my being alive. He had not, nor any report or letter explaining why he had disobeyed my orders. So ended our dreams of the Star, of what she was to do for us and of what we might be able to do with her. With characteristic fondness for speculating over what might have been, I thought a good deal that day and I have thought a good deal since, of what we might have accomplished with her had she not been taken else- } where. { It seemed that in accordance with my instructions Wilkins had | at first taken command of the Star, with Aarnout Castel as sailing | master and himself as engineer. Wilkins had intended to bring me to Norway Island my former traveling companion, Natkusiak, and some other Eskimos, including at least one seamstress. The ) spring had been a fairly early one and the Star made her way suc- _) cessfully to Herschel Island. Here, as misfortune would have it, ‘| | Wilkins made a decision, wise in itself, of waiting a few days till 272 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC the mail came down the Mackenzie River, so that he could carry the mail to Banks Island and especially so that he could secure the chronometer watches and other scientific equipment which I had asked the Government to send by way of the Mackenzie, expecting them to be picked up just as Wilkins was doing. But while he waited for the mail he incidentally waited so long that he was overtaken by the Alaska and Sachs coming from Collinson Point. Wilkins’ point of view now was one with which, in spite of my great admiration for him in general, I never could agree. It seemed to me that as he had his orders from the commanding of- ficer direct he should have obeyed them irrespective of countermand- ing orders from any officer of inferior rank. The theory he acted on was that my death had removed me from the situation and that Dr. Anderson was the actual commander and his orders should take precedence, mine being as it were canceled by an assumption of my death. Dr. Anderson now told Wilkins that he had decided not to let the Star go to the Norway Island rendezvous but would take her to Coronation Gulf instead. For reasons which he gave, he would transfer Wilkins to the Sachs. The reason for the transfer had been the assertion that the Sachs was better for sending to Banks Island because she was the bigger ship. This was canceling my judgment as well as my orders, for if I had thought so I should have arranged it that way. The sup- position that the Sachs was better than the Star was tenable only if the chances of meeting ice were ignored, and obviously the chances of meeting ice around Banks Island were much greater than of meeting it in the direction towards Coronation Gulf. The reader will recall how the Star was purchased especially for the Banks Island trip, and how the Sachs, through her twin propellers, was particularly badly suited to those more northerly and icy waters. Wilkins had transferred to the Sachs, taking Natkusiak with him, and the Sachs had come to Banks Island. But on the way one of her propellers struck a cake of ice, as was to be expected, and was broken off. She had also been insufficiently caulked before leaving winter quarters and was leaking heavily. When she got to Kellett she found considerable ice along the sandspit and Wilkins decided to haul her ashore in the last week of August for the fol- lowing reasons: First, she was leaking so fast that she had to be waned forty minutes out of every hour; second, she was under one propeller and THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 273 hence very difficult to maneuver, and her speed had been cut to two miles per hour as against six; and third, it was not believed that I was alive. Even under this last head Wilkins had been prepared to go ahead to Norway Island had the ocean been open, be I alive or dead; but in view of the disabilities of the ship and in view of the ice at Cape Kellett, the consideration that he did not expect to find me alive, anyway, weighed heavily with him. There was also the pressure exerted by the opinions of the crew. Levi had explained that any ship going north beyond Kellett would be in grave danger of being unable to get out of the country again the following year, and as they were provisioned for one year only and had orders from Dr. Anderson to stay but one year, they considered it unwise to go on. But at Kellett they knew of no harbor in which a ship would be safe, although we have since found a good one for a boat of her draught two or three miles east of where she was actually hauled out. Not knowing of this harbor, they saw no way to keep her safe except to haul her out on the beach. They accordingly un- loaded her, put her broadside against the land, got out their ropes and tackle and hauled her up. There she was when I found her, rather a house than a ship, for it was impossible to launch her with- out beams to slide her back into the water. These beams she did not have and they could not be obtained on Banks Island. A tale of minor importance told by Captain Bernard was that Peder Pedersen, whom I had engaged as engineer for the launch Edna, had been unable to run her during the summer and that this had greatly handicapped Chipman in his survey work of the Mackenzie Delta. Chipman, failing to get any use of the launch, had carried on his work as best he could with a whale boat and had, after the delta survey had come to an end, towed the Edna behind the whale boat to Herschel Island. Here she met the com- petent engineers of our ships, Jim Crawford of the Sachs, and Daniel Blue of the Alaska, who in two or three hours put her into good shape. Dr. Anderson, having decided to take the Star to Coronation Gulf, gave the Edna to Wilkins who, not knowing Banks Island conditions, thought she would be worth taking along. Where the Edna could have been valuable was in the eastern work she had been bought for, although the Star was of course better. Coronation Gulf is free from ice most summers and is full of islands, an ideal place for a power launch. But in Banks Island there is so much ice on the west coast that only under rare circumstances 274 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC ean a launch be useful; and while it might be well enough to carry such a boat on a big ship where she could be hoisted in davits, she was nothing but a white elephant to the Sachs, which was too small to handle her comfortably on deck. The Edna had been towed part of the way and nearly wrecked by ice; then with the greatest dif- ficulty they had managed to lift her up on the decks of the Sachs. We might have made some use now of the Hdna if she had been in seaworthy condition. I put Crawford at fixing her up, but it was eight or ten days before she was ready for use. By that time the frosts had set in and the season of navigation was over. Two new chronometer watches had been sent to me by the Government down the Mackenzie and had arrived before the Sachs sailed. One of these had been taken for O’Neill to replace the watch he had turned over to me, but Wilkins had been given the other, so we now had two good pocket chronometers. A battery of three Waltham ship’s chronometers, really huge watches mounted in gimbals, had also been given the Sachs, and various small items of scientific equipment from the Alaska. But there were three exceedingly serious gaps in our equipment. A special feature of our ice exploration was the large water- proof tarpaulin used to convert our sleds into boats. Of the two the expedition possessed we had already used one for the trip from Martin Point to Banks Island, and it was nearly worn out. The other I had expected would be brought by the Star. It had been taken to Coronation Gulf to be used for spreading over stores to keep the rain out. The specially strong sled which we had lost with Wilkins and Castel had also been taken to Coronation Gulf. Lighter sledges of the sort best suited to work on or near land had been sent us instead. Why the tarpaulin and the sled had not been sent us I under- stood in a measure, though not fully. What I never understood was that the Alaska had miles of sounding wire and sent us none of it. This was truly heartbreaking. We should have to make our ocean exploration next spring over depths inevitably beyond the reach of our 1386 metre line, and thus our journey would be robbed of half its scientific value. An answer to all these things would be: “We thought Stefansson was dead, and expected Wilkins to confine his activities to the shores of Banks Island where the boat tarpaulin, the strong sled, and the sounding wire would be needed no more than by us in Coronation Gulf.” THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 275 Apart from the relief of being told of the safety of the Karluk’s men, it was rather depressing news the Sachs had brought us. Evi- dently our task of exploring the ocean to the west and north of Prince Patrick Island was going to be difficult, both because of the gaps in our equipment and because of the too southerly base at Kellett. But to this cloud there was the silver lining that the southern section of the expedition was, so far as I could judge from the news, in an excellent position to do good work. I hoped so then, and later events fully justified the hope. The competent specialists of that section secured during the next two years a fund of information and a mass of specimens such that had we achieved no other scien- tific results than those gathered by the complement of the Alaska, the expedition could be considered to have added materially to the sum of knowledge.* While I have mentioned both Wilkins and Natkusiak, I have said nothing about meeting them. This is because they were not at home when I arrived, but were the hunters who were away and for one of whom I was mistaken when I was seen coming down the hillside towards the camp. They had gone to the northeast looking for caribou two or three days before. We planned to send some- body in the morning to look for them and bring them back. Mean- time Wilkins had got track of us on his own account, a story that I am enabled to let him tell for himself, since he has written a magazine article on the incident from which I may quote. After telling how the Sachs was forced to decide against trying to get north beyond Cape Kellett and how they first landed there, he goes on: “We saw no trace of game on the land, and finding no trace of Stefansson we were fully convinced that even had he reached the land he must have starved to death. After waiting in vain for the ice to move we decided to establish winter quarters and search the coast for his dead body or possible traces of him, when condi- "| tions would permit sledge travel. There was not sufficient snow on | the ground to travel along the coast, so with an Eskimo companion | who had been with Stefansson on most of his arctic journeys I went ; inland afoot. We hunted for two days without success and at night we discussed our leader’s fate. “There were many reasons why he could not be alive. He had not come ashore in Alaska. We thought he could not get food * For a summary of the scientific results of the Alaska section, see Ap- | pendix. 276 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC on the ice; he could not travel to Banks Island against the wind and drift, and even if he had reached Banks Island, he must surely have starved to death. Natkusiak, the Eskimo, explained that Stefansson had recently developed many unusual ideas. When he first knew him he was like the other white men, but lately Stef- ansson had been getting so he wanted to do many things that other white men never did. All the Eskimos knew that a man cannot go far out on the sea ice and live, and now Stefansson’s death had proved it. He thought that it would be the last time, as it was the first, that any one would try to do anything so foolish. We went to bed mourning the loss of our leader, but feeling that we had always known that he would not succeed. “The third morning we started out early, determined to stay out all day and all night in a final effort to find some game. I walked a mile or two from our camp, and then from a hilltop I saw a beacon in the distance that I had not noticed the day before. I examined it with my glasses and thought as it was near the coast that it might be an old one erected by somebody from a passing whaling ship. But I was almost sure it had not been there the day before. Then came the thought, ‘Perhaps it’s one that Stef- ansson has just erected!’ and I hurried towards it. I found myself running as my hopes grew stronger. As I neared the beacon I could see that it was a new one built of sod. Could it be that Stefansson and his party were alive? I reached the place almost breathless and found a tiny note in Stefansson’s handwriting. He and at least one of his companions were alive! “* Make camp on the beach a quarter of a mile S. W. from here’ was all that was written on the note. But that was enough to tell me that they were alive and traveling in the direction of our boat. I hurried back to my camp, but meantime the Eskimo had gone hunting. I could not go home without him, so I waited all day and half the night. He at last returned, having been successful in killing several caribou and a polar bear. “We made all haste to the main camp, discussing on the way the probable condition in which we should find the men. We thought of them as worn and haggard, starving and struggling on toward the camp with one last effort. In fact, I thought of them in every condition of which I had read of heroic explorers in story- books. We reached the hut at four o’clock in the morning and I tiptoed round the sleeping quarters, not daring to wake them for fear they needed rest. Stefansson’s two companions, Storker Storkerson and Ole Andreasen, were fast asleep in the bunks and THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 277 were snoring roundly, but Stefansson had occupied my tent. I peeped in and saw him sleeping. In the dim light I could not judge the men’s condition and decided to look at their dogs. These were fat and frisky and the whole six that left Alaska were there. I was amazed, yet not prepared for the sight of the men when the cook’s breakfast shout brought them to the kitchen. All of them were fat and strong, stouter, in fact, than when we last saw them. They had with them when they left Alaska only a month’s supply of food, and now five months had elapsed and they were pictures of health and strength. They told no tale of hardship, hunger, or adventure. We were almost disappointed. They had traveled eastward over the ice, shooting bears or seals when they had need for food, and had made the journey of over a thousand miles, living on the local food supply, and had never missed a meal! They had in fact completed, so far, the plans of the expedition almost in detail. “So this was the end of the enterprise which for months I had heard condemned or deplored by Eskimos and whalers and the men of arctic experience in our expedition as ‘one crazy and two deluded men going north over the sea ice to commit suicide!’ ” CHAPTER XXVII THE AUTUMN HUNT IN BANKS ISLAND, 1914 when he turns to them at all, with the desire and expecta- tion of reading about suffering, heroic perseverance against formidable odds, and tragedy either actual or narrowly averted. Perhaps, then, it is partly the law of supply and demand that accounts for the general tenor of arctic books. However that may be, my main interest in the story I am telling is to “get across’ to the reader the idea that if you are of ordinary health and strength, if you are young enough to be adaptable and independent enough to shake off the influence of books and belief, you can find good reason to be as content and comfortable in the North as anywhere on earth. An example to me is the fall of 1914, to which I fre- quently look back as a time I wish I might lve over again. To begin with, we had that all-important thing, an object for which to work. The Sachs had brought the news that the Karluk had been wrecked near Wrangel Island, that the main resources of our expedition had sunk or had been diverted beyond our reach. But it was up to us to make good in spite of that. I confess the idea of a large expedition had had in it for me less of challenge than the new conditions imposed. When you have under you many officials and more subordinates of a lower rank, it is with a com- mander largely a case of issuing orders, an easy but uninteresting way of bringing anything about. Now, with most of our best men and resources gone, it had become a matter of individual prowess. We had to show that by adapting ourselves unaided to local con- ditions a few could do the work of many. The first point was that, although the Sachs had brought a certain amount of food, this wouldn’t have been enough even for one winter if men and dogs had subsisted entirely on the cargo. Furthermore, as polar expeditions have proved from the earliest times down to Scott, living on ship’s food brings danger of scurvy. We did not have dozens of competent and locally familiar Eskimo hunters as Peary did to send out here and there for meat of walrus 278 LD viernes the average man turns to polar narratives, THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 279 or cattle or caribou, but only one Eskimo hunter, Natkusiak. And walrus and cattle are absent from Banks Island and its vicinity. That the native resources here were less than are commonly found in the North made the task all the more absorbing. It was a question of caribou and seals, and the seals we left to the mid- winter. This for two reasons: first, you can kill seals under favor- able circumstances even in the twilight of winter when the sun never rises, but for caribou, where the field-glasses are as important as the rifle, daylight is necessary for any considerable success; and second, to us who have lived long in the North the lean caribou of midwinter and spring are only a food and not a very satisfactory one at that; but the fat caribou of the autumn are a delicacy. Wilkins, Natkusiak, and I commenced the hunt at once by traveling three days northeasterly from our base at Kellett. It was snowing hard most of the time. We could not see more than a mile or two, and all caribou tracks were naturally buried. It is an idiosyncrasy with me, or possibly a matter of pride, that however abundant the food supply is in the camp from which we start upon a hunt, we seldom carry more than two or three days’ provisions. We have never yet failed to get some game before the fund was gone, and it is generally good policy, for one travels more rapidly, hunts more energetically and feels a greater reward in his success when he knows that it is a matter of getting game or going hungry. It need not be imagined either, that the method is dangerous, for no one who has tried fasting can be induced to fear four or five days without food. You get no hungrier after the afternoon of the first day, and any traveler who complains about going three or four days without food will get scant sympathy from me. Having three days’ provisions in the sled means that your party is good for at least ten days, before which time something is sure to turn up. Darkness was coming on rapidly and we had to make our harvest in its season. The caribou were getting leaner and their meat less desirable. On the fourth day I asked Wilkins, then least experienced of the three of us, although he later became a first- class hunter, to stay and guard the camp while Natkusiak and I struck off in different directions through a fairly thick blizzard. The visibility of caribou in that sort of storm was under four hundred yards, but there is this compensatory advantage in a blizzard, that by real watchfulness you are practically certain to see caribou before they see you, and at a range where you can begin shooting at once. Furthermore, the wind drowns any noise 280 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC you may make and the storm itself seems to make the animals less watchful. While you have a small chance of finding caribou at all, yet if you do run into them you have a good chance of getting them. We were in a country which none of us had previously seen, and there were no river-courses or landmarks that could be thought- lessly followed with the assurance that you could with equal thoughtlessness follow them back again. In thick weather it is a matter of the closest observation and the most careful reckoning to find your way home to camp. As you advance you must notice the speed at which you are walking and the time it takes to proceed in any given direction, and must know exactly at what angle to the wind you are traveling. Furthermore, you must check the wind occasionally, either by pocket compass or by a snowdrift on the ground, to see that it isn’t changing, for an unnoticed change in the wind would throw any reckoning completely out of gear. The method is first to walk around the hill—our hunting-camps are commonly on high hilltops—and study each face of it until you feel sure that if you strike any point within half a mile of camp you will recognize it on the return. When the topography of the half- mile square or so surrounding camp has been memorized, you strike out perhaps into the wind or perhaps at an angle of forty-five or ninety degrees to it, and travel straight for an hour or two hours, according to the degree of confidence you have in your ability to get back. If no game has been found, you turn at some known angle, commonly a right angle, to your original course and walk in that direction an estimated distance, perhaps as far as In the first direc- tion. If then nothing has been found you turn again, and if this time also you make a right-angle turn, it is easy to calculate at what time you are opposite camp and one hour or two hours’ walk away from it. Turning a third right angle will face you directly for camp, and if you have been careful you will land within half a mile of your mark, or within the area memorized before starting. But should you miss it you will know at any rate at what time you are close to camp, and by thinking the matter out you will see how to walk around in circles or squares of continually increasing size until you find a place you recognize. If in the course of your walk you do see game, your first thought must be to take the time by the watch, or make some similar ob- servation to assure yourself at that moment of the direction of your camp. If you can kill the game at that spot the matter is simple, ‘SNING GNV LVdyY dO dvory V GWOT DNIONIUG ‘SNUWNIOddg WAGSOJ, YOd SAVAPT HII SNIMG GNV GOO] SALNIAA AHL Yor Lvayy “LLETIGY LY ONIGVOIN() ‘syoDy Cid NY FHL AOHSY DNTIOVAT THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 281 but if you have to follow about a good deal, or if it is a trail you come upon rather than the game itself and you follow the trail, then it is not so easy to lay down the rules for getting back. Everyth#g can, however, be summarized by saying that you must continually memorize your course; and if you do this it is a matter of angles to determine the course you must eventually take when you start for home. This simple outline of our procedure in a storm, and in fact at all other times when direct vision will not serve, will show at once why it is that a white man of trained mind can find his way home so frequently where an Eskimo gets lost and has to camp and wait for clear weather. In the hunt under discussion I walked about three miles into the wind, then three miles to one side and back to camp without seeing any sign of game. But Natkusiak had better luck. Within two or three hours we knew that this must be so, otherwise he would have been back; and sure enough, just as daylight was disappear- ing he returned with an account of seeing about thirty caribou and killing and skinning seventeen. Wolves were very numerous at this time and we frequently saw them in bands of ten or less, and our first concern was to get the meat of these deer home. By the next evening we had more than three-quarters of it safe, although the wolves did get some. When the meat had been gathered, Natkusiak and I again hunted but in clearer weather. This time the luck was reversed; he got no deer, while I secured an entire band of twenty-three in twenty-seven shots. It must not be supposed that killing twenty-three caribou in twenty-seven shots is remarkable. This will appear when you see how it was done. To begin with, my powerful field-glasses sighted the band at seven or eight miles. I advanced to within about a mile of them, climbed a hill much higher than the rest of the coun- try, and used half an hour memorizing the topography. There were various small hills and hollows and creek-beds here and there, with branches in varied directions. All this could be studied from the elevation. The main difficulty was to remember the important details after you had descended into the lower country, where everything on closer view looked different. The wind was fairly steady and I made the approach from leeward. But I found when I got within half a mile of the deer that they had moved to the top of a ridge and were feeding along the top about sidewise to the wind. There was no cover by which they could be directly ap- 282 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC proached, so I went to the ridge about half a mile from them and lay down to wait. They grazed in my direction very slowly for half an hour or so, and then lay down and rested an hour and a half or more. Meantime I had nothing to do but wait. If, when they got through resting, they had decided either to descend from the ridge or reverse their course and graze back to where they came from, I should have had to make another detour and start the hunt over again. But they grazed toward me, and in another hour every one of the twenty-three was within two hundred yards and some of them within fifty yards. Caribou and other wild animals commonly fail to recognize danger in anything that is motionless, so long as they are not able to smell it. They saw me plainly, of course, just as they saw all the rest of the scenery, but their intelligence was not equal to realizing that I was something quite different. About this season, when the lakes are freezing all around, the lake ice and even the ground itself keeps cracking with a loud, explosive noise, so caribou frequently seem to take rifle-shots for the cracking of ice and are not disturbed. I took pains to see that my first shots especially should be of the right kind. What you must guard against especially is a wound through or near the heart, for an animal shot that way will startle the herd by making a sprint of fifty to two hundred yards at top speed and then drop- ping, turning a somersault in falling. But he will always run in the direction he is facing when shot, so that you can control his movements by waiting to shoot until he is facing in a suitable direc- tion. When an animal is frightened he will run toward the middle of the band, and if he is already there he will probably not run at all, at least for the moment. But caribou shot through the body back of the diaphragm will usually stand still where they are, or, after running half a dozen yards, lie down as if naturally. I there- fore now did the thing that may seem cruel, but which is necessary in our work; I shot two or three animals through the body, and they lay down quietly. The shots had attracted the attention of the herd but, sounding like ice cracking, had not frightened them. Furthermore, the sight of an animal lying down is conclusive with caribou and allays their fear from almost any source. I then moved my rifle so slowly that the movement was unnoticed, and brought it to bear on the next one, holding it so near the ground that the working of the bolt in reloading was equally not noticed. After the first animals had lain down I shot two or three that were near instantly dead with neck shots, and then began to aim for THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 283 the hearts of those farthest away, so that any if they ran, would run towards me. The calves were left till the last. The very deliberation with which this sort of hunting is done, while it makes conspicuous the element of apparent cruelty, makes it the least cruel method possible in point of the pain caused the animals. A number of hunters greatly excited and blazing ajway in the manner of those inexperienced or afflicted with “buck fever,” will mean all sorts of painful wounds that are not fatal and that may be borne for days or weeks by animals that escape. The most cruel of wounds to caribou is a broken leg, for there is no hope of recovery, and yet they can escape for the time being. I have on two or three occasions had a chance to study these animals afterward. They appear to realize that their speed, now that they have only three legs to run on, is inferior to the rest of the herd, and they are in evident and continual dread of the wolves that are sure to drag them down unless a hunter’s bullet mercifully intervenes. In a properly conducted hunt by such a method as ours a wounded animal hardly ever escapes, and with our powerful rifles even a shot through the abdominal cavity will ensure death in five minutes to half an hour. The reason for killing entire bands of caribou is conservation and convenience. If you kill them in scattered places the freight- ing problem becomes serious, and especially the matter of protec- tion of the meat from wolves. But with a big kill you can camp by the meat and see that none of it gets lost. Furthermore, in islands like Banks Island, caribou are so scarce that in the ordi- nary fall hunts in order to get enough meat we have to kill 75 per cent. or more of all animals seen. In the fall of 1914 we had only two or three weeks of reasonably good daylight in which to get meat for all winter. For when the daylight comes again in the spring we are not only busy with exploratory work, but also the meat is lean and neither as nutritious nor half as palatable as if fall-killed. Any one who sees charm in the life of a hunter or life in the open will need no argument to convince him that the lives of arctic hunters are interesting, but he may think they are uncom- fortable enough for that to be a serious drawback. This is by no means the case, thanks to the cozy dwellings in which we spend | our nights and excessively stormy days and any periods that are idle through necessity or choice. | A snow house that is essentially as comfortable as a room of | the same size in an ordinary dwelling-house can be put up in fifty 284 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC minutes or an hour by the method already described. They are spotlessly clean, beautifully white; they protect you so perfectly from the weather that you actually have to go outdoors to find out if it is good or bad. You are warm enough, as I have said, to sit in your shirt sleeves and as comfortable as can be. CHAPTER XXVIII MIDWINTER TRAVEL AND ITS DIFFICULTIES in getting ready for the exploratory work of the coming spring. Captain Bernard occupied most of his time making sledges. Much of the material was obtained by stripping the ship of her “ginger work” to secure the hardwood and iron. Our pemmican had gone with the Karluk, and our steward, Baur, and others spent many hours slicing and drying beside the galley stove the meat of polar bears, seals, and caribou which the rest of us killed either at sea or on shore and brought to camp. The Sachs had not brought us much fuel, so that one or two men had to busy themselves con- tinually in searching up and down the coast, under the snow, for pieces of driftwood and hauling these home, sometimes a distance of fifteen miles. A special windfall was the discovery of a whale carcass on the beach about ten or twelve miles southeast of winter quarters, One afternoon Natkusiak and I were going down that way with a dog team, traveling about half a mile from the land through a moderately thick snowstorm. We were starting out on an extended trip meaning to be gone several days if not weeks, and we were ap- proaching land for the purpose of finding deeper snow for making camp. We were nearing the beach and it was already so dark that rifle sights could no longer be seen for good shooting when a band of nine wolves made rapidly toward us. One’s first thought must always be to look after the dog team, and as I was walking ahead I took hold of the leading dog, telling Natkusiak to upset the sled and thus prevent the team from dragging it when the wolves and the shooting got them excited. Natkusiak stepped to one side, kneeling on one knee and waiting for the wolves to come as close as they would. At about fifty yards they drew up sharp when the dogs began yelping with excitement, and Natkusiak fired at one of the two large wolves—there were evidently the parents and seven nearly grown pups. They immediately broke and ran, Natku- siak firing several times after them—we were now near a ship’s 285 I IKE all of our arctic winters, the winter of 1914-15 was spent 286 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC stores, so ordinary rules of ammunition economy did not apply. Shooting with a rifle in half darkness must always be a matter of chance and the wolves escaped, though one left a trail of blood, perhaps the one originally fired at. We now proceeded with both of us holding the harness of the greatly excited dogs, and about a quarter of a mile from a creek mouth where we expected to find good camping snow, a bear walked out from shore and lay down near a big cake of ice about two hundred yards from the land. Natkusiak turned the sled over on its side again and went after the bear while I restrained the dogs. I had seen one bear on top of a forty-foot cutbank and another at the foot of it about half a mile away, but I could not leave the team until Natkusiak had killed his bear. One shot did it and then I righted the sled and let the dogs make their own way to Natkusiak awaiting them beside the bear, while I turned aside to follow the ones I had seen on the land. Meantime three other bears came scampering from the shore, going past Natkusiak about three hundred yards away. He fired a dozen shots but missed on account of the darkness. As the bears were running over the ice I could see their outlines only faintly and could not see their legs at all. This meant that although Natkusiak was only about half as far from them as I he had no good chance for aiming, as he only caught glimpses of them as they appeared and disappeared between the hummocks. I followed on the land for a little way, but the snowstorm thickened and the pursuit turned hopeless. Of course we realized that some special local thing had at- tracted the bears and wolves, and that it could scarcely be any- thing but a whale carcass. We built our snowhouse right by the dead bear, while foxes, white and ghostlike in the half dark, cir- cled around inspecting us. We must have seen dozens, and had there been bright daylight we should probably have seen a hun- dred. That evening we merely skinned the bear, waiting for day- light to look for the whale. It was not difficult to find it. About two hundred yards from the camp the snow was thick with fox tracks and there were dozens of holes where they had been burrowing through a snowdrift down to the carcass. Some of the foxes ran away when we approached, but others stood their ground at a distance and a few barked at us. We could have shot them but preferred not to injure their value as scientific specimens or as furs. Natkusiak was in his element. Although we had been just set- ting out on what was intended for a long journey I changed the THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 287 plans, leaving him by the carcass to watch for bears while I re- turned to the ship with a load of bear meat and the news of our find. That evening Thomsen went to the whale with a dog team and twenty or thirty fox traps to spend the night with Natkusiak. They divided the traps between them and set them one lot at each end of the carcass. At first they caught the foxes at the rate of eight or ten an hour, and sat up nearly all night at the work of skinning. This whale proved of the greatest usefulness. Not only did we get a dozen or more bears in connection with it, but it furnished excellent dog feed that year and even the year following, for decay of a whale carcass lying in such a position is exceedingly slow. It was half buried in sand, but in summer continually bathed with sea water. As the temperature of the polar sea is actually below the freezing point of fresh water (often as much as 2° F. below freezing) it was not strange that decay should not be rapid, especially when one remembers that the sea water is happily im- pregnated with common salt and other chemicals that are bac- tericidal in nature and of well known efficacy in preserving meat. With this work going on, Natkusiak and I nevertheless found time for an exploratory crossing of the south end of Banks Island. Since we made this in the darkness of midwinter, first-class ge- ographic results were not to be expected. Our main purpose was, in fact, to pay a visit to the Eskimos whom we supposed to be wintering on the southeast corner of the island. The supposition that we should find them there was based on the verbal statements of these Eskimos themselves when in the spring of 1911 I had met them on their return from Banks Island on the ice of Prince Albert Sound.* Eskimos may be as truthful as any people, and they are; nevertheless, they give wrong impressions even to one another and to those most conversant with them because of their fatal lack of exact words for time and distance. Although the Mackenzie River Eskimos, for instance, have numerals and can count up to four hundred (twenty twenties) those of Victoria Island, Coronation Gulf, and vicinity (the Copper Eskimos) cannot count above six. They have to describe distances by such indefinite terms as “not far” or “very far,’ and with regard to time their vocabulary is almost equally vague. We now know that the por- tion of the winter spent by them on the southeast corner of Banks _ Island is not January, but March and April. But not knowing it then, we devoted much of December to a * See “My Life With the Eskimo,” p. 281. 288 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC hazardous crossing of the mountains back of Nelson Head. The danger is not in the mountains themselves, although precipices are frequent, but in the darkness which makes every precipice treach- erous. Because of the elevation of the land to perhaps fifteen hundred or two thousand feet, and because of the open water which prevails most winters around the south end of the island, every breath of wind that blows off the sea is converted into a cloud of fog when it strikes the colder hills. The daylight is negligible; and the moonlight, which comes to you first through clouds that are high in the sky and later through an enveloping fog, is a light which enables you to see your dog-team distinctly enough, or even a black rock a hundred yards away, but is scarcely better than no light at all upon the snow at your feet. So far as the eyes can tell, you never know whether you are going to step on a bank of snow or into an abyss. Walking ahead of the team I used to carry a pair of large, dark-colored deerskin mittens. After throwing one of them about ten yards ahead, I would keep my eyes on it till I got within three or four yards and then throw the other, so that most of the time I could see the two black spots on the snow ahead of me separated by five or six yards of whiteness. But in falling snow or in a blizzard we used to remain in camp, sometimes two or three days at a time, unless we happened to be following a valley where, without great danger of falling, we were merely inconvenienced by walking now and then against the face of a cliff. Although the south end of Banks Island where we crossed it was no more than fifty miles in diameter, we traveled in twilight and darkness through labyrinths of valleys between haphazard mountain ridges double that distance between December 22nd and January 4th, when we reached the sea ice of De Salis Bay. In another five days we had: examined the whole southeast coast of the island and had crossed Prince of Wales Straits to Victoria Island without discovering any signs of human beings. This is the one time of the year when traveling is dangerous if you rely upon game for food and fuel. The game is there, of course, no less than at other seasons, but the darkness is the handicap in securing it. We found the ice in the vicinity of Victoria Island not to be in motion, and as there consequently was no open water the chance of getting bears was less than elsewhere. Seals could be secured only through the tedious method of having the dogs discover breath- ing-holes and then waiting for the seals to come up, a method THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 289 where the element of chance plays such a part that no one should use it where another method is available. So instead of stopping to hunt in Victoria Island when our food-supplies began to run low, we turned back to Banks Island toward open water observed on the way along the coast east from De Salis Bay.. One reason why supplies began to run low was that we had taken but little food with us from camp, even though we realized that midwinter darkness was going to make hunting precarious. It was imperative to travel light if we were to cross a range of mountains, climb steep ridges and make precipitous descents into valleys, in daylight insufficient for the selection of better courses. A light sled could be managed; a loaded one could not be moved by the combined strength of men and dogs. I had also felt certain of finding the Eskimos who would have had stores of food from which to supply us. When we turned back from Victoria Island I had no immediate intention of giving up the search after Eskimos, but expected merely to replenish food stores at De Salis Bay. January 12th was our first day of hunting. A clear day at noon, it gave day- light enough to see the sights of the rifles for about two hours, al- though not clearly enough for good shooting. It is never really safe to leave a camp unguarded, with the dogs subject to attacks of wolves and bears, but we took the chance, and went in dif- ferent directions to search for game, I to find none, Natkusiak to kill one seal. For three days after that both of us continued to be unsuc- cessful in our hunting. Both of us killed seals, but the ice was moving so rapidly that before we could secure them they had been buried under crushing heaps. Tracks of polar bears were numer- ous, and it was only a question of time when one would be en- countered. On the fourth day I had just killed a seal and secured it when over my shoulder I saw three bears approaching. It was past the twilight noon and their yellowish-white outlines against the pure white ice were so indistinct that they could not be seen except when they were moving, or at least their bodies could not, except for the shiny black noses. When bears are on the alert and when they either see something indistinctly or are expecting to see something the presence of which they suspect, they move their necks and their whole bodies to peer about in a peculiar snaky / way. Then they give about the effect of railway men’s signal lights that are being swung on a dark night. These particular bears 290 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC made themselves conspicuous now and then by standing on their hind legs, which brought their profiles against the sky. My first two shots brought down one big bear and a small one, but the third inflicted apparently only a flesh wound and the bear that received it disappeared in the rough ice. Natkusiak, about half a mile away, heard the shooting and soon arrived. We skinned the two bears, and, making a sort of sledge of the skin of the small one, loaded into it its own meat and dragged it home, allowing the meat of the other and the seal to take its chances. These bears came just in time, for we had but a single meal left of the seal killed three days before. The fol- lowing day we found where we had left them the other bear and the seal, although the ice, which was crushing in the neighborhood, might easily have buried them during the night. One of the most serious losses when the Karluk sank will be recalled as that of our small kerosene-containers intended for sledge journeys, which had been substantially made of galvan- ized iron. As kerosene is much more convenient than blubber for cooking in snowhouses in winter, we were carrying a supply of it in an ordinary five-gallon tin such as is furnished by the oil companies, and now found that it had sprung:a leak and that nearly all the kerosene was gone. This mischance, together with the too rapid passing of the midwinter period, decided me to give up for that year the search for Eskimos and to return to the winter base at Kellett. We made the return with such good luck in weather for picking a trail through valleys where earlier we had floundered up and down ridges, that we were able to travel in one day as much as forty-five miles, a distance that had taken seven days on the way east. When we got back to Kellett we found that Wilkins had com- pleted a series of tidal observations. But both during this period and through most of his time with the expedition he put much labor and care into the gathering and preparing of zodlogical specimens. This is, for any one who lacks the scientist’s enthusi- asm, a sort of work where the fun soon wears off. The animal, say a fox, is first measured as to several dimensions in a routine way. Next the skin is carefully removed and hung up to dry, salted or “poisoned” with arsenic and alum or some similar chemical, and a label attached giving all available information as to age, sex, size, date and place of killing, etc. The skull, after being cleaned and having the brain removed through the foramen magnum in a tedious way, is labelled correspondingly with the skin, and THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC 291 so are the “long bones” of all four legs, and the lot are put away. These are the data of the closet naturalist who studies the speci- mens and the accompanying information after the expedition gets home. I have never known any one who worked harder than Wilkins. He would be cleaning the scraps of meat off the leg bones of a wolf before breakfast and scraping the fat from a bearskin up to bedtime at night. His diaries were filled with information about the specimens he gathered, his fingers were stained with the pho- tographic chemicals used in the development of his innumerable plates and films, his mind was always alert and his response al- ways cheerful when a new task was proposed. A half dozen such men would make an invincible polar expedition. Everybody remaining at the home base was working so well that it seems almost invidious to single out Wilkins. Crawford, Ole Andreasen, and Storkerson were at their trapping camps five, fifteen and twenty-five miles away, catching each his hundred or two hundred foxes, the pelts of which grow more expensive each year as women’s need for summer furs increases. These three men were working for the expedition only half the year and so had time to grow rich during the winter. The men at the base camp were trapping foxes also in their spare moments, but many pelts went to Wilkins to become zoological specimens and the rest to the expedition storekeeper, for all these men were on full pay and everything they secured belonged to the Government. But | most of their time was spent in work preparing for the ice trip. Mrs. Thomsen at home and Mrs. Storkerson at the trapping camp were busy making or mending skin clothing. Thomsen hunted seals for dog feed part of the time and foraged around Kellett with his team in search of driftwood. Levi did the cooking, in addition to slicing and drying bear and caribou meat to make it more portable as sledge provisions, and, most important of all, kept everybody in good spirits with his inexhaustible good nature and his everlasting tales, some of which were probably truer than they sounded, though the adherence to truth was never slavish enough to make them commonplace. Captain Bernard, a won- derful carpenter, blacksmith and mechanic in all lines, worked as early as Wilkins and as late repairing or making sledges. His ingenuity and industry were beyond price, for we had no good sledge except the one used in coming to Banks Island over the ice the previous spring. Neither did we have any really suitable _ material for making a new sled, but by plundering the Sachs of a 292 THE FRIENDLY ARCTIC bit of hardwood here and a strip of iron there Bernard was able to make us one of the finest sleds we ever used. It must have hurt him to do it, for he loved the Sachs, which he had owned for -many years before selling her to us, and he had sold her with the provision that he might buy her back at the end of the voyage. He already had dreams and plans of what he would then do with her. | DEPARTMENT | CANADIAN A Discoveries Positions oP Geodetic ay 6 © ame Bie — © 76 BEAUFORT SEA LEGEND Route to Victoria f. _.---------- QUASI ES eS Sled Journey over Drifting [ce IPA CRUIDOR Sanne ne ee cen Route of the “Polar Bear. ___- Storkerson's Trail__..--.-----.. We! Goasti1n6 sso ese SOUNDINGS IN METR Ne. 7-2 — -- Baillie Is. LIVERPOOL a aa Lt mist! “Hawk begga Hae bouboCkenortioal iad owned’ fag Lent gemtinctene lf hee qth that shen) lo ysved ged} © voyag ics za ae te er Van — ” Pa sleneeedenainememenetiny ar sees MB 3 s : ® ite © ited en |} : es aaa’ ete cine % "Ee % Bacses o ' h | % Lead =} % yt = ea oh es ee Me } Sa ape bas 4 } _ be rio sqa0 Po rts ) er Giz t PaxvAg | iprsiferng POEs APPS a A.sireisi'l ot ste TR ee phe een eetbatich