COLUMBIA LIBRARIES OFFSITE

HEALTH SCIENCES STANDARD

HX64099881
QP77 .T33 1 91 7 From evolved beginni

RECAP

Columbia (Hntoenft'tp

mtijeCitpoflrwfark

College of pfjpsiicians; anb gmrgeon*
Htbrarp

ma •* .

From Evolved Beginning

(i. e. A Hole filling in with Gastronomic Ingredients)

To Involved Endment

(i. e. A Whole filled out with Anatomic Particulars)

By HENRY DAVIDGE THAYER

Practician and Propagandist of

Physio-Psychic-Pronormalism

PATHESCOPIC PRESS

1608 N. 18th Street

Philadelphia. U. S. A.
19 17

<ap7?

t- ■•

FORE NOTE

ALL-of-us concretely impart substance to an end, posited as an
absence right ahead, that, as aimed to, equals our future, and, as
apparently arrived to, equals that area-of-our-becoming, called : Space.

EACH-of-us discretely derive evidence from a beginning, possessed
as a pre-sense left behind, that, as named from, equals our past, and,
as ostensibly departed from, equals that era-of-our-bypassing, called:
Eternity.

The hopeful aim of ALL-of-us to an unknown end ahead, as ex-
perimentally essayed and hypothetically evolved, equals: Life.

The faithful name of each-op-us from an unshown beginning
behind, as experientially assayed and apotheotically involved, equals:
Knowledge.

Life, equals the aim of an experimental essay.

Knowledge, equals the name of an experiential assay.

The experimental essay of Life-Aims, provides the means that the
experiential assay of Knowledge names.

The experiential assay of Knowledge-Names, confides the mean-
ings that the experimental essay of Life aims.

Life, equals the outreachment of expandive pressure to the end of
coming to be the materialized-content, or substance, of such end, i.e.
coming to be a thing.

Knowledge, equals the backgraspment of contractive tension from
the beginning of passing as being the memorialized-contour, or evi-
dence, of such beginning, i.e. passing as being a think.

Life, coming to be a thing, comes as A-motion, and ends as a
matter-of -achievement.

Knowledge, passing as being a think, passes as E-motion, and
begins as a memory-of -purpose.

No sooner do Life-Knowledge contact, than, Life (dammed by
assayive knowledge) comes to be a materialized rest at such point of
contract and knowledge (vented by essaying life) passes as being a
memorialized continuation during such period of contact.

Life, equals the aim of any congeries of atoms spontaneously di-
rected to the end of bodying forth (or materially expressing) an infelt
(valid but without body) yearning, i.e. an idealized desire concretely
essayed by all.

Knowledge, equals the name of any series of items simultaneously
corrected from the beginning of forming back (or memorially impress-
ing) an outseen (void as without form) learning, i.e. a realized con-
summation discretely assayed by each.

as

CD

2

- ' CORRECTIONS AND EXPLANATION b
- Before attempting the study of the following pages, the correc-
tions indicated below should be carefully made; otherwise, the student
will add confusion to a task, already extremely complicated, because
of its variation both1 in method and practice from established courses.

. ",, CORRECTIONS

The word "contract," at the beginning of the third line of the
thirteenth paragraph of the "Fore Note," on page two, should read
"contact." * . . . i :

The syllable "uclaive," at the beginning of the last line of the
third paragraph oh page five, should read "cludive."

; The word "acquisition," near the end of the first line of the fourth
paragraph on page> seven, should read "acquisition."

, The word "anticaption," at the end of the seventh line on page
eleven, should read "anticipation."

The word "fatus" near the end of the tenth line on page eleven,
should read "faiuus"

The word "Expectent," in the second line of the third paragraph
on page eleven,; should read "Expectant."

The word "conjectural," at the beginning of line eighteen on-
page twelve, should read Vprojectural." ■"_

The word "indammed," at the end of line, nineteen on page twelve,
should read "indammedness^ -

The word; "£e$e£," at the beginning of the next to the, last line of
next to the last paragraph on page, sixteen, should read "their." And,
the word "(EACHE)," in the same line, should,read "(EACH).';

The word "HOL," in the caption line on page eighteen, should
read "HOLE." : , - .

Insert a connective hyphen between the. words "think" and
"passing," in. the fourth, line of the fourth, paragraph of the section
titled, "ROOT AND FRUIT, V on page twehtyrpne. • .....„■

, The word "omtogeneratively," in lifre twelve on page twenty-tiyo,
shouldL read "o.ntogeneratively.". .; , .... ,!.,f :

The word "enthusiasm," in the third line of the fourth paragraph
on page twenty.three, should read "enthusiastic

Insert "be,";. after "comes to,,." in, the second line of the fifth
paragraph on.. page .twenty-three. w

The word "hypst.atic," in the last line of the last paragraph on
page twenty-four, sliould read "hypostatic."

r No other explanation, than that, the deviations above noted, were
deviations from, copy, compositorially originated and sanctioned by
printorial proof-reading— -and, because of the lack of time, on the
writer's part to carefully revise the proof before going to press, need
be offered. - r

To enable the reader to make a clear line of demarcation between
the NOT-ME, or the content that sensiblv ingredients^ the "cavity
cones of gastronomic-intakement." that evolutively culminate as the-
eye-of-the-genus-homo, and, the YET-ME, or the contour that mensibly
particularizes the "safety zones of anatomic-outmakement." that invo-
lutively originate .as ihe-I-of-the-homogeneou?* , tjie. ME, must be

posited and possessed, as the protomolar-skin-tension, operating be-
tween the contrapolar-air : heir-pressures, with, the air-(i. e. flash and
flood) -pressure, or the intending-in-pressures, playing the role of
expending-performance, of A-motion, to which, ME (the protomolar
skin tension), operates as an endosmosic-dam-of-perceptual-intake-
ment; and, with, the heir-(i. e. flesh and blood) -pressure, or the
extending-ex-pressure, playing the role of impending agent, of
E-motion, which to, ME (the protomolar skin tension), operates as
an exosmosic-vent-of-conceptual-outmakement; whencefrom, the A-mo-
tion, that electrically in its ether-ore-weather-watt-area, comes to be,
via ME, as consciously-objectified, the beheld-performance-that-My-
Eye-Cone-of-vision-witnesses-as-its-Not-Me, and, thencefrom, the
E-motion, that electively in its either-or-whether-w hat-era, passes as
being, dia ME, as understandingly-subjectified, the byheld-agent-that-
My-I-Zone-of-vigor-counsels-as-its-Yet-Me, so that, the NOT-ME,
variably comes to be A-THING-OF-MULTIPLIED-COEXISTENCE-
IN-MY-OPTIC-CONE-OF-VISION, and the YET-ME, constantly
passes as being A-THINK-OF-INCREASED-SUCCESSION-IN-MY-
OPTIVE-ZONE-OF-VIGOR.

The monstrous-exhibition, showing-off, as NOT-ME, i. e., that
electrically engendered natural evolution of objectivity, that ingredi-
entally fills in My-Eye-Cone-of- Vision, the bare consciousness of which
reveals it "void as without form," or as matter-per-se, i. e. that uni-
versal-thing-in-spatial-becoming, called : My-Environment-in-general,
and, that menstruous-inhibition, known-on- as YET-ME, i. e. that
electively exgendered spiritual involution of subjectivity, that particu-
larizedly fills out My-I-Zone-Of- Vigor, the mere understanding of
which reveals it "valid but without body," or as memory-inter-alia,
i. e. that individual-think-in-eternal-bypassing, called: My-Functivity,
respectively, indicate to what end, ALL-OF-US, aim our creatorial
essay, i. e. the end of witnessing our own universal performance, and,
indicate from what beginning, EACH-OF-US, name our creatural
assay, i. e. the beginning of counselling our individual agent — and,
such end and such beginning, mesoblastically reduced to a reconcilable
mean, that, as objectified, turns out to be (epiblastically) a thing-void-
as-without-form, and, that, as subjectified, turns in (hypoblastically)
as being a think-valid-but-without-body, as so meaned, i. e. as aimed
to as an end, and, as named from as a beginning, equals: SELF-
DISTINGUISHMENT, or the thing, that, as coming in by way of
ME, demands by its very effectiveness, as here represented, a divining
provision, or a priori cause, and, the the think, that, as passing out by
weigh of ME, supplies, by its very motivality, as now reproduced, a
humanized convision, or a posteriori consequence.

OBVERSE PARALLELS

A-motion E-motion

Haven Art

Essay Assay

Act Faet

Root Fruit

Substance Evidence

Spontaneous

Come-to-be

Progress

Proposed

Problem

Preyer

Hole

Quo Animo

Sum

Purpose

Becoming

All-the-same

Consciousness

Intellect

Outreaching

Growing-out

Bodying-forth

Apparent

Air

Sun

Performer

Counselor

Autognosis

Sense

Stimulus

Cause

Direction

Effect

Contribution

Product

Quantum

Nature

Genus

Species

Expansion

Gas

Heaven

Dausrhter-of-the-root

Prolineal

Pre-action

Prescribe

P°nless-Inkstreak

Content

Void-as-without-form

Pea! -Object

A uto-Negation

Euture-the-gatewav

Bef ore-Consummation

A fW-Cor summation

Anticipation

Journey Man

Showing-off

Simultaneous /

Pass-as-being

Presence

Composed

Solution

Prayer

Whole

Quoad Hoc

Mean

Achievement

Bypassing

Each-an-other

Understanding

Conscience

Backgrasping

Drawing-in

Forming-back

A Parent

Heir

Son

Witness

Agent

Hypostasis

Mense

Animus

Motive

Correction

Consequence

Distribution

Conduct

Qualis

Spirit

Genius

Specious

Contraction

Solid

Earth

Mother-of-the-fruit

Collateral

Re-action

Describe

Tnkless-Penstroke

Contour

Valid-but-without-body

Ideal-Subject

T4eu-Affirmation

Pa st-the-dateway

After-Desire

Before-Desire

Participation

Journeyman

Knowing-on

Matter

Means

Life

Path

Point

Logic

Ethnology

Intropermeate

Immediation

Absence

Ether

Ore

Weather

Electric

Watt

Area

Infinite

Thing

Endeavor

Hypothesis

Imagination

Will

Work

Res Gestae

Contiguity

Protomolar

Recall

Explanation

Incubation

Thermoanalysis

Event

Eve

Experience

Vigor

Immortal

Eternity

Time

Possession

Iteprovement

Apartness

Virtue

Bvhold Ui

I-Zone

:Yet-Me

Functionfcation

Succession

Involved

Anatomy

Tension

Nerve

Memory i

Meaning

Knowledge

Period

Scope

Aesthetics

Ethics

Extravasate

Recognizance

Pre- Sense

Either

Or

Whether

Elective

What

Era

Definite/

Think

Enthusiasm

Apotheosis

Likenation

Judgment

Word

Fes Media

Interval

Cortrapolar

Initiative

Inclination

Excavation

Photosynthesis

Atom

Adam

Experiment

Vision

Indestructible

Space

Place

Position

Improvement

Togetherness

Power

Behold

Eve-Cone

Not-Me ■ • • -■'

Environment

Coexistence

Evolved

Oastrononvy

Pressure

Blood

Physio-Psychic-Philosophy.

A AND E OF M

For A and E, the moietal-f unctions of JE (their sum-faculty), to
essay to assay their A and E functivities apart from JE (their facul-
tate togetherness) , requires that, A and E, contrary to their ante-
cedent method, operate away from instead of toward JE.

And, as operating away from instead of toward JE, A and E,
would, by essay of A (or All of JE), ostensibly destroy JE, as the
sum of their togetherness (or intropermeative apposition), and, as
substitution for JE (so ostensibly destroyed), by assay of E (or Each
of JE ) , would apparently restore a Not JE, as the mean of their apart-
ness (or extravasated opposition) of vocation.

Let JE, to A, or All, equal A-Hole, that All gastronomically in-
gredient by their dissipating essay, to the proposed end of JE's in-
finite progression.

Let JE, from E, equal A-Whole, that Each anatomically particu-
larizes by their conservating assay, from the composed beginning of
JE's definite presence.

Hence, as ostensibly destroying JE, A, or All, as longing away
from JE left behind, posit such ostensible destruction, as the escape
of All from A-Hole, and the arrival of All to an aimed to absence-
from-JE, that as so seemingly arrived to, equals The-Not-JE, or the
"apartness-from-iE-aimed-to-by-All-as-ar riving."

Thence, as apparently restoring JE, E, or Each, as looking away
from JE right behind, possess such apparent restoration, as the es-
cape of each from A-Whole, and the departure of Each from a named
from pre-sense-of-JE, that, as so seemingly departed from, equals
The-Yet-JE, or the "apartness-from-^-named-from-by-Each-as-de-
parting."

The NoWE, aimed to ahead by All, and bodied forth by the os-
tensible arrival thereat by All, equals: the absence-from-^3, aimedly-
filled-in by the ostensible arrival to such absence-from-^E, of All,
which absence-from-iE, as ever coming and as ever there, equals,
Not-^2, or what All image "apartness-from-jE" to be. Not-jE, equals
a point of anticipated arrival, dreamed-of -by-All.

The Yet- JE, named from behind by Each, and formed back by
the apparent departure thenceduring by Each, equals, the pre-sense-
of- JE, namedly-filled-out by the apparent departure from such pre-
sense-of-iE. by each, which pre-sense-of--<E, as ever passing and as
ever then, equals, Yet--«E, or what Each likens "apartness-from-^S"
as being. YeWE, equals a period of participating departure, waked-
to-hy-Eachr

3

Whatsoever, All, dream of in the evening of anticipated becoming,
thatsoever, Each, wakes to in the morning of participating bypassing.
Which "evening" and which "morning," equal the morning and the
evening of the first day, and every other day since, incident to the
division-of-labor-scheme, essayed and assayed by A and E, as indi-
cated in the opening paragraph above.

We subconsciously will all together in the evening of a dreamed-
of-absence-ahead, that preposited end, called future, which end, equals
the prepossessed beginning, that, superconsciously, we judge-each-
apart in the morning of a waked-to-pre-sense-behind, called past.

As gastronomically ingredienting an absence-from-& , All come
to be Tnatters-becoming-because-of-aimsj-imparted-to-such-an-END-by-
All, whencefrom, All, race from a hole to aimedly fill in an absence;
and, as anatomically particularizing a pre-sense-of-JE, Each passes
as being memories-bypassing-by-reason-of-names-derived-from-such-a-
BEGiNNiNG-by-Each, thencefrom, Each, traces from a whole to named-
ly fill out a pre-sense-of-& .

The absence-from-^E, as ingrediently filled-in by the aims of All
(as subconsciously essayed), may be a place filled in with any matter
evolved by the dissipating aims of All thereto, as say: Wood. Wood,
equals a gastronomic (sensible) immediation.

The pre-sense-of-J3, as particularizedly filled-out by the names of
Each (as superconsciously assayed), may be a time filled out with any
memory involved by the conservated names of Each thence during, as
say: Tree. Tree, equals, an anatomical (mensible) recognition.

MATTER AND MEMORY

ALL-matter, equals: gastronomic-immediation, with "intellect,"
playing the role of "absence-of-^33," and with "sensible-stimulus" (the
ground-of-all-matter), equal to the racing-ahead-of-xiSL-to-aimedly-fiU-
in-an-absence, or a quasi-hole.

EACH-memory, equals: anatomic-recognition, with "conscience,"
playing the role of "pre-sense-of-^E," and with "mensible-animus" (the
bound-of -each-memory) , equal to the tracing-behind-of-KA.CH-to-nam-
edly-fill-out-a-pre-sence, or a quasi-whole.

The definition of "matter," runs so: Matter, equals: an intel-
lectual-hole~filled~in-with-sensible-stimulus, or an absence filled-in with
the dissipating motion of what (as willing) aims-to-it.

The definition of "memory," runs thus: Memory, equals: a con-
scientious-whole-filled-out-with-mensible-animus, or a PRE-SENSE filled-
out with the conservated notion of what (as judging) names-from-it.

Matter, equals, a hole-of-absence-fiUed-in-with-statified-ingredi-
ents, and objectifiedly posited as a thing.

Memory, equals, a whole-of-pre-sense-filled-out-with-ratified-par-
ticulars, and subjectifiedly possessed as a think.

The division of labor, interrogatively initiated as a proposed
"matter-of-achievement," by all, as exclamatorily recalled by EACH, as
composed, was a "memory-of-purpose!"

The fact that the "memory-of-purpose" comes last, has its unique
obversity, in the act, whencefrom, the "matter-of-achievement" passes
first.

4

Now, pile up your aims from Amoeba to Anthropoid, and file down
your names from onomatopaeic concatenations to sylleptic codifica-
tions; from simplicity to amplification of metabolic organisms; from
amplifications to simplification of symbolic canonisms; and, yet back
of those phalanxed orders of specific evolution, lies that gastronomic
hole, the filling in of which, equals the end experimentally aimed to
by organic greedy creatorial essayers; and, yet ahead of these ritual-
ized classes of specious involution, lies that anatomic whole, the filling
out of which, equals the beginning experientially named from by
canonic creedy creatural assayers.

All of Us-Anatoms, or Wholes, essayively aim (or will) to-
gether, by a universal experiment, to arrive at (and to) an absence,
preposited ahead, as, Each of Us-Gastronoms, or Holes, assayively
name (or judge) apart, by an individual experience, as departing
during (and from) a pre-sense, repossessed behind.

The undertaking of A and E to operate away from instead of to-
ward JE, resulted in A (like January First) aiming ahead as im-
mergively filling in the holelike area between A and E (like to De-
cember Thirty-First ahead); and, in E (Hke December Thirty First)
naming behind as emergively filling out the wholelike era between E
and A (like to January First behind) : with JE, as the Midnight-Point-
and-Period between Dec. 31, ult. and Jan. 1, prox. playing the role of
Hole, as departed from by A (or Jan. 1, racing ahead to aimedly fill
in absence-from-JE, or Not-iE, and, playing the role of Whole, as ar-
rived to by E (or Dec. 31, tracing behind as namedly filling out pre-
sense-of-JE, or Yet-JE. Hence, the maneuver, had no other result than
to change JE from includive-sum of their apposed vocations, to en-
uclaive-mean of their opposed vocations.

Neither A nor E have separate functions despite their seeming
extravasation from JE, which proves their (intropermeative) inalien-
ability; and neither have they any intelligence apart from JE (be it
their Sum or their Mean), which proves its untranscendibility ; for
no sooner does A destroy JE's physical actuality by departing, than
E restores JE's psychical f actuality by arriving; and, no sooner does
E restore JE's psychical factuality by arriving, than A destroys JE's
physical actuality by again departing.

FUTILE AIMS AND FATUOUS NAMES

Were it not for the futile aims of A (or All) ethntfogically di-
rected to an impossible future, and, for the fatuous names of E (or
Each) ethically corrected from an unactual past, the untranscendible
instant of an inalienable now: here would again be OURS, having
neither beginning of days, nor end of life.

Before Logical-Power (figuring out problems of infinite progress)
and Aesthetic-Virtue (lettering in solutions of definite presence), fig-
ured out an end other than infinite progress and lettered in a begin-
ning other than definite presence, such a "thing" as absence (be it
called "not-here," "there," "space," "not-now," "then," "eternity,"
"future" or "past"), was unknown; and such a "think" as pre-sense
(be it called "yet-there," "this," "place," "yet-now," "is," "time,"
"postiquity" or "antiquity") was unshown.

5

Let "thing" designate any-materialized-remainder-the-self-dis-
tinguishment-of-which-equals-" conscious-being."

Let "think" define any-memorialized-reminder-the-self-distinguish-
ment-of-which-equals-"being-understood."

THING AND THINK

Any "thing" figured-out by Logical-Power (i. e. The-Imagination),
as the objectified re-presentation of its willed-essay-to-become-self-dis-
tinguished, shows such things to be a-matter-integrated-by-such-dis-
sipating-essay, the "self-distinguishment" of which, equals "conscious-
being."

Any "think" lettered-in by Aesthetic-Virtue (i. e. The-Poet's-Pen),
as the subjectified re-production of its judged-assay-as-become-self-
distinguished, knows such think as being a-memory-particularized-by-
such-conservating-assay, the "self-distinguishment" of which, equals
"being-understood."

The "thing" figured-out to be (re-presentatively) the "self-dis-
tinguishment" of Logical-Power, so gratified Logical-Power, that he
gradually lost sight of his real occupation of figuring out problems of
infinite progression.

And, the "think" lettered in as being (re-productively) the "self-
distinguishment" of Aesthetic-Virtue, «o edified Aesthetic-Virtue, that
she gradually gained sight of her ideal occupation of lettering in
definite presence.

Logical-Power came to be a Man of Property (or treasure), i. e.,
the creatorial proprietor of a creatural-organon — a mechano-teleo-
anatom.

Aesthetic- Virtue passed as being a Woman of Proportion (or
measure), i. e. the recordorial propriety of a scriptural-canon — a
chemico-archeo-gastronom.

As so divded in occupation, Logical-Power, learned (parrotlike)
to repeat the words of Aesthetic-Virtue ; and, Aesthetic-Virtue, yearned
(monkeylike) to imitate the works of Logical- Power. And the prog-
ress of logical-power, consisted of looking behind for definite words
by meanings of which to express his infinite impressions; and the
presence of aesthetic-virtue, consisted of longing ahead for infinite
works by means of which to impress her definite expressions. Which
looking-backward plus longing-ahead indicates the crablikeness of the
mean of parrotlike meanings (or repetitions) and monkeylike means
(or imitations) .

Self-Distinguishment demands that no two things presently occupy
the same place except as exclusive coexistence in space; and, that no
two thinks progressively occupy the same time except- as includive
succession, in eternity.

Self-Distinguishment indicates the alienation of each from all and
the reaffiliation of each with each by more and more complex combi-
nation apart from all.

All apart from each equals "absence of each," or a hole.

Each apart from all equals "pre-sense of all," or a whole.

If to all, the absence-of-each, equals the absence-of-wholeness,
then the function of all will be to yearn for wholeness, or content.

If from each, the pre-sense-of-all, equals the pre-sense-of-hole-
ness, then the function of each wil be to yearn for holeness, or contour.

To holeness, ever a gastronomic-function, the acquisition of whole-
ness brings that sensation of integral ingredientation, called: con-
tent, or elemental-treasure, i. e. sensible-stimulus.

To wholeness, ever an anatomical-function, the acquistion of
holeness brings that mensation of segregal particularization, called:
contour, or eventual-measure, i. e. mensiBle-animus.

In yearning for wholeness, or for eachness, the absence of which,
causes such yearning, Holeness, posits such eachness, anticipatorially
re-imaged, as a contrapolar other, the interval between which and it,
it outreachingly aims to bridge by essayive endeavor.

In yearning for holeness, or for allness, the pre-sense of which,
motives such yearning, Wholeness, possesses such allness, partici-
patorially re-likenessed, as a protomolar other, the contiguity between
which and it, as attending, it backgraspingly names, by assayive
enthusiasm.

ALLNESS AND EACHNESS

Thus, allness (self -distinguished) posits eachness (self -distin-
guished) as its contrapolar other, or as a contingency ahead, the
interval between which and it, it aims to bridge by vigorous endeavor.

And, so, eachness (self -distinguished) possesses allness (self-dis-
tinguished) as its protomolar other, or as an inevitability behind, the
contiguity between which and it, as attending, it names by visional
enthusiasm.

And since eachness and allness are inalienable, the operation
above described, stands manifestly out as an operation of pure insan-
ity, the sole ground and bound of which idiotic performance, lies in
the Notion-of-Self-Distinguishment, by means and by meaning of
which notion, each and^all (otherwise inalienable) have, as essayively
aimed by all and as assayively named by each, built up and main-
tained a res media between all and each, as intervalled extremes, that,
for metabolic creaturization, or seekers after gastronomic content-
ment ; and built up and maintained a res gestae between each and all,
as contiguous confluences, that, for symbolic scripturization, or seekers
after anatomic contouration, parallel each other at extremity and
during confluence in infatuated perpetuity.

All our aims are experimentally initiated to an end, i. e. a matter
of achievement, inclined to as an absence ahead, pre-known by name,
or mensible contour.

Each our names are experientially recalled from a beginning,
i. e. a memory of purpose, explained from as a pre-sense behind, pre-
shown by aim, or sensible content.

Every end, as aimed to, must be known by some designation, or
name, at the time when the experimentally initiated aim begins, which
name, in that eventuality, equals the end posited by "being understood"
antecedently.

Each beginning, as named from, must be shown by some defi-
nition, or aim, at the place where the experientially recalled name
ends, which aim, in that elementality, equals the beginning possessed
by "conscious being" subsequently.

Intelligence, in its totality, consists of the inalienable relation of
aim and name; and, intelligence, as an act," consists of aiming a name;
and, intelligence, as a fact, consists of naming an aim.

Aiming a name, equals, to experimentally (or by act of will, or
"conscious-being"), aim an experientially (pre-known) name, i. e. a
designated-end.

Naming an aim, equals to experientially (or by fact of judgment,
or "being-understood") , name an experimentally (pre-shown) aim, i. e.
a definited beginning.

Now, the aim of All (from a beginning to a pre-designated end)
was self-distinguishment coming to be; and, here, the name of each
(to an end from a pre-definite beginning), was self-distinguishment
passing as being.

But, as the aim, was actually an experiment directed to an
unknown end, as aimed to, and from a pre-known yearning, as aimed
from; and, as the name, was factually an experience corrected by a
pre-shown beginning, as named from, and with an unshown learning,
as named with: the experiment no more could transcend its primitive
experimentality, as aimed, despite its materialized realization at aimed
to points, than the experience could transcend its latest experientiality,
as named, despite its memorialized idealizations during named from
periods — for, since, the thing anticipated by all (as experimentally
aimed to ahead in time), and, the think participated in by each) as
experientially named from behind in place), was the same ens, to wit:
Self-distinguishment, neither its absence ahead, as aimed to, nor, its
pre-sense behind, as named from, could be other than the same refer-
endum, in one aspect, posited by all as the parallaxal interval between
all and the "absence-of-each," and possessed by each as the introllaxal
contiguity between each and the "pre-sense-of-all."

IMPROVEMENT AND REPROVEMENT

Physio-Psychic-Pronormalism, divides every Ens, into (a) An-End
(contingently posited as a possibility in becoming) ; and (b) A-Be-
ginning (actually possessed as an inevitability in bypassing) .

Let an-end equal a point (experimentally) aimed to by that that
begins.

Let a-beginning equal a period (experientially) named from by
that that ends.

Let that that begins equal an universal purpose (i. e. the logical
power of a proposed problem) ; and, let that that ends equal an indi-
vidual achievement (i. e. the aesthetic virtue of a composed solution).

As interoperants, that that aims to an end and that that names
from a beginning, equal respectively, the universal-all-togetherness
and the individual-each-apartness operating between such end and
such beginning. .■......'.

Such beginning and such end equal the untranscendible paren-
thesis of the inalienable aimer that posits the end of such parenthesis
as the point of its problematical emancipation and the inalienable
namer that possesses the beginning of such parenthesis as the period
of its solutional incarceration.

The end aimed to by the logical power of the universal-all-togeth-
erness was a point of infinite progression, to which prognosively, as
by a spirit of anticipatorial hypothesis, all wended all its way.

And, the beginning named from by the aesthetic virtue of the
individual-each-apartness was a period of definite presence, from
which diagnosively, as by the nature of participatorial apotheosis, each
mended each its way.

The end, so directly aimed to, was a haven point of anticipated
improvement, i. e. a heaven.

The beginning, so correctively named from, was an art period of
participated reprovement, i. e. an earth.

The end that never ended, was in such aspect, a point of infinite
progression, to which all universally aimed together; the intent of
which was the longed-for improvement of all.

The beginning that never begun, was in such aspect, a period of
definite presence, from which each individually named apart, the
extent of which was the looked-for re-provement of each.

For, certainly, unless each was re-proved from the beginning, the
improvement of all at the end, were impossible.

For, how could aught essayively come to be improved, unless such
improvement involved an antecedent assayive reprovement?

And likewise, how could aught assayively pass as being reproved,
unless such reprovement evolved a subsequent essayive improvement?

As interoperantly, universally improved at the havenward end
of their untranscendible parenthesis, and, individually reproved during
the artlike beginning of their untranscendible parenthesis, the inalien-
able pair, wended their universal ways to the boundless improvement
of an infinite progression, and, mended jtheir individual ways from
the groundless reprovement of a definite presence.

Now, imagine that inalienable pair, ostensibly essaying and appar-
ently assaying, no longer their untranscendible unity of vocation, and,
liken that inalienable pair, so essaying and so assaying, to become to
be and to bypass as being. Self -Distinguished (together apart) from
their untranscendible unity, or, as a divided vocation (despite their
inalienability), transcending (despite its untranscendibility) , their
ultra-includive parenthesis, and, then, you have (as essayed) an
account of the essay recorded in first genesis; and, there, you have
(as assayed) the account of the assay recorded in second genesis,
et sequa.

And, as syntheticized to its latest presiduum, and, as analyzed
from its earliest residuum, the presiduum so evolved and the residuum
so involved, equal me, that all, that My-I subjectively feels, as untran-
scendible unity in succession, and, they each, that My-Eye objectively
sees, as inalienable parity in coexistence.

RENASCENT BECOMING AND PREMORTEM BYPASSING

To begin with (as renascently becoming), we consciously find
ourselves materially equipped (because of a priori foresight) with
organic-means; the intuitive (outreaching) nature of which, cate-
gorically predicts the evolving (stimulussed) ends, to which (intel-
lectually) our dissipating (expiring) lives will be directly aimed.

To end with (as premortemly bypassing), we understanding^
find ourselves memorially equipped (by reason of a posteriori hind-
sight) with canonic-meanings; the innate (backgrasping) spirit of
which, dogmatically indicates the involved (animussed) beginnings,
from which (conscientiously) our conservated (inspired) knowledges
have been correctively named.

Our beginnings directed to an end, despite their universallized
amplitude (coexistently expressed), antiquate back all their plural
achievements to a singular purpose, that accounts, root et sequa, for
all their renascent becoming, the nature of which, in all its works,
reveals a Logical-Power, i. e. explicitly designated: Power-of-The-
Eoot, or The-Origin-(in perpetuum) -of -Life.

Our endings corrected from a beginning, despite their individu-
alized simplitude (successively impressed), futurize ahead each their
singular purpose from a plural achievement, that accounts, fruit et
infra, for each their premortem bypassing, the spirit of which in each
its words, conceals an Aesthetic- Virtue, i. e. implicitly defined : Virtue-
of-The-Fruit, or The-Ultimate- (in perpetuum) -of '-Knowledge.

Our beginnings and ends, therefore, respectively, refer, as becom-
ing, and relate, as bypassing, to the works of a Logical-Power, and,
to the words of an Aesthetic- Virtue, operating in two distinct spheres,
i* e. the former, in the area of an amplifying outreachment ; the latter,
in the era of a simplified backgraspment, clearly distinctified as to
separatedness of vocation, but plainly coalescent in the media-gestae,
or the ibid in common of their (otherwise) separate vocations, and,
which, in both the spheres of their (separate) vocations, and, which,
as, the ibid in common of their (otherwise) separate vocations, equals:
Self-Dis tinguishment.

Self-Distinguishment, as a res media repels them apart in (gas-
tronomical) divorcement, and, as a res gestae attracts them together
in (anatomical) conjugation.

Hence, the end, at which the beginning of Creation aimed, and, the
beginning, during which the end of Creation named, was, as willed by
The-Logical-Power, and, as judged by The-Aesthetic- Virtue, was (gas-
tronomical) (anatomical) Self-Distinguishment.

Hence, previous to such essay and previous to such assay, neither
the essayer nor the assayer, was self-distinguished, else why the
essay and the assay? Hence, intro-homogeneity of vocation, and not
extra-specification of vocation, characterized the functional operations
of The-Logical-Power and The-Aesthetic- Virtue.

Self-Distinguishment, was therefore, as Unknown, as futured, by
the essayer thereto, because of an anticipatorial yearning logically
aimed at and objectifiedly becoming, as, Self-Distinguishment, was
Unshown, as antiquated, by the assayer thereof by reason of a par-

10

ticipatorial learning aesthetically named <hu *ag its subjectified by-
passing.

To The-Logical-Power, that essayed to realize its objectified-
unknownness, because of the hope engendered by his infelt and out-
imaged yearning, in both aspects, "an absence," Self-Distinguishment,
was a thing-of-preposited-becoming, to which The-Logical-Power out-
reachingly raced along, as sensibly filled with the spirit-of-anticaption,
and, as bridging the interval between the extremes of his expiring aim
and his materializing object, brought him closer and closer to that
ever becoming, and never arrived to, ignis fatus, called: Futurity.

To The- Aesthetic- Virtue, that assayed to idealize its subjectified-
unshownness, by reason of the faith engendered by her outseen and
inliknessed learning, in both aspects, "a pre-sense," Self-Distinguish-
ment, was a think-of-prepossessed-bypassing, from which, The-Aes-
thetic-Virtue backgraspingly traced around, as mensibly filled with
the nature-of -participation, and, as attending the contiguity between
the confluences of her inspiring name and her memorialized subject,
took her further and further from that ever bypassing, and, never
departed from, lignus vitae, called: Antiquity.

Hence, Self-Distinguishment, as essayively aimed to, as a Thing-
of-preposited-becoming, was the Heir-Expectent, that was, at his com-
ing, to fill in the stadium of space, or "absence-ahead," with all man-
ner of mighteous-works, that, beheld by the (all seeing) eye of the
father, as evolved by his expiring-essay, equal, the reflection of all
his works, or the photo sythetized-image of all his works, in which, as
in a dissolving vision, he, as expiring ancestor would witness the evo-
lution of his own posteritorial-otherness, to wit: his universal self-
distinguishment.

Thence, Self-Distinguishment, as assayively named from, as, a
Think-of-prepossessed-bypassing, was the Heir-Apparent, that was,
during its passing, to fill out the radius of eternity, or "pre-sense-
behind," with each manner of righteous-words, that, byheld by the
(each feeling) I of the mother, as involved by her inspiring-assay,
equals the reflection of each her words, or the thermoanalytical-
likeness of each her words, in which, as in a resolved vigor, she, as
inspired posteritor could witness the involution of her own ancestral-
otherness, to wit: her individual-self -distinguishment.

The future of self-distinguishment, as materially evolved by the
expiring-essay of its logical-progenitor; and, the antiquity of self-
distinguishment, as memorially involved by the inspiring-assay of its
aesthetic-progenitor, gave to such self-distinguishment, large assets,
from his paternal side, and, vast liabilities, from his maternal side;
in the paternal area, equalling: Intellectual-Treasures-of-Infinite-
awaredness-as-regards-effectualized-immediacy; in the maternal era,
equalling: Conscientious-Measures-of-Definite-bewaredness-as-regards-
consequentialized-recognizances.

Thus, Logical-Power and Aesthetic-Virtue, primordially, the in-
alienable-functions of an untranscendible-faculty, i. e. that Intelligent-
Genius, of their intropermeative begetment, whose infinite path was
progress and whose definite scope was presence, by their seeking after

11

self-distinguishment (or the impossible in view of their inalienability)
and, the unactual (in view of its untranscendibility), found their
inalienable vocations, ostensibly changed to Rational-Will and Ethical-
Judgment, or as the bifurcated creators of an implacable media-gestae,
to wit : that Ambidexter-Genus, of their extra vasated-begetment, whose

})ath lies chimerically-a-head, as an unknown-future, and, whose scope
ies mendaciously -behind, as an unshown-antiquity.

In its ambidextrous operation, the implacable media-gestae, via
which they achieve, as Quixotically essayed by Logical-Power, alias
Rational- Will, and, purpose, as Sanhedrally assayed by Aesthetic-Vir-
tue, alias Ethical-Judgment, equals A lens; on the posterior side of
which, and through which lens, as through a vent, Rational-Will pro-
jectures experimentally what it imaginatively posits self-distinguish-
ment to be; and, on the anterior side of which, and beyond which, as
beyond a dam, Ethical- Judgment conjectures experientially what it
likenatively possesses self-distinguishment as being; whencefrom, such
lens, or the media-gestae phase of self-distinguishment, as feeling such
conjectural outventing through it, feels an inward outpassing vigor;
and, thencefrom, such lens, as seeing such conjectured indammed
beyond it, sees an outward incoming vision.

VISION AND VIGOR

As so outwardly conscious of an external vision and so inwardly
understanding an internal vigor, our res medial lens, thus, evolved
and involved, rises to the Ultima Thule of self-distinguishment, via:
The-Res-Gestael-Gens, or that which perceptually seizes the species of
the vision and makes them out to be a phylospecificated otherness
coexistently photosynthetized ; and, that conceptually seizes the indi-
viduals of its vigor and makes them in to be an ontogenerated oneness
succesionally thermoanalyzed ; or, in one side, equal to My-Gastro-
nomical-Hole filling in with materialized (i. e. immediated) means,
and, in the other side, equal to My-Anatomical- Whole filling out with
memorialized (i. e. recognized) meanings.

That outside envisioned, equals: Not-Me, and, this inside envig-
ored, equals: Yet-Me.

My-Eye sees many (or all) coexistently posited as an objectified-
Not-Me; My-I feels one (or each) succesionally possessed as a sub-
jectified Yet-Me.

Via My-Eye, The-Logical-Power, beholds its self-distinguishment
coexistently reflected back as an Universal-Thing-in-becoming; via
My-I, The-Aesthetic-Virtue, byholds its self-distinguishment succes-
ionally reflecting ahead as an Individual-Think-in-bypassing.

INTERVAL AND CONTIGUITY

The substitution, or the attempt to substitute, an "interval" for a
"contiguity," by The-Logical-Power and The-Aesthetic-Virtue moieties
of an inalienable-parenthood, the untranscendible product of which
inalienable-parenthood, was Their-Child; or the substitution of a "bi-
sexual-contrapolarity" for a "unisexual-homogeneity," as an extra-
mode of procreation, was, really, as essayed by such homogeneous-

12

hood, nothing other than the attempt of such inalienable-parents to
self -distinguish each their own-solus-use contradistinctively from their
one-holos-ooze, or that untranscendible product of their inalienable-
parenthood, called : Their-child, the intelligent-genius, of which, as the
"gray-matter" that facultatively presided over (as the sum product
of) the factoral contributions of The-Logical-Power and The-Aesthetic-
Virtue, that parentally resided within its (and their) constituted
integrity, despite their conspiracy to dethrone its genius, and, in lieu
therefor, substitute that stultifying "genus," via which, ever since,
they, as in one way self-distinguished by a blind-will-in-earthly-evo-
lution-of-natural-organs, and, in another way self-distinguished, by
a cold-judgment-in-heavenly-involution-of -spiritual-canons, have, os-
tensibly as essayed and apparently as assayed maintained their own-
functional-uses apart from each other; of which I John 6:7 recites:
"For there are three that bear record in heaven . . . And these
three are one. . . . And there are three that bear witness on
earth . . . And these three agree as one."

Whencefrom, since, the three that assay (bear record quo animo)
as one in heaven, and, since, the three that essay (bear witness quoad
hoc) as one on earth, are The-S'ame-One, operating as a divided labor
the onus of which equals Self-Distinguishment, what shall we conclude?

// — subconsciously — by an experimental aim universally essayed
by-ALL-of-us-( atoms) -tog ether — we atoms, concretely direct all-our-
motion to (and at) a point-of -infinite-progression (ever posited as
an area of holelike absence ahead) — and — if — superconsciously — by an
experiential name individually assayed by each-o/-us- (items) -apart
— WE items, discretely correct each-our-motion from (and during)
a period-of-definite-presence (ever possessed as an era of wholelike
pre-sense-behind) — there, as yearned and aimed to by all of us
(atoms) together, such point-of-infinite-progression, could equal the
fixed-point in the constellation of Hercules, to which, we-atoms, in
our role of Solar-System, as to an end that ends not, all-together
concretely wend our universal (A) -motion — and — then, as purposed
and filled-in by all of us (atoms) together, such area-of -holelike-
absence-ahead, would equal The-Space, through and within which,
we-atoms, in our role of Solar-System, as at an end that ends
not, all-together directively, by our dissipating (A) -motion, ingredient
(in so far, as we-atoms, coexistently come to be the substance of the
ends (or things), that, all-together, we materializedly body forth-)
— and — here, as learned and named from by each of us (items)
apart, such period-of-definite-presence, would equal a free-period in
the configuration of ME, from which we-items, in our role of Molar-
System, as from a beginning that begins yet, each-apart discretely
mend our individual (E) -motion — and — now, as achieved and filled-
out by each of us (items) apart, such era-of-wholelike-pre-sense-be-
hind, beyond and without which, we-items, in our role of Molar-
System, as during a beginning that begins yet, each-apart correct-
ively, by our conservated (E) -motion, particularize (in so far, as,
we-items, successionally pass as being the beginners (or; thinks),
that, each-apart, we memorializedly form back.

13

Thus, we-atoms, all together constitute the universal substance
of the-things, that, as concretely willed by us-atoms (through the
area of our holelike notness) come to be; — and, so, we-items, each
apart institute the individual evidence of the-thinks, that, as dis-
cretely judged by us-items (beyond the era of our wholelike yetness),
pass as being.

REALISM AND IDEALISM

Philosophy, ranges from the Realism of thing s-that-come-to-bt
(i. e. Becoming, sensibly materialized), to the Idealism of thinks-that*
Pass-as-being (i. e. Bypassing, mensibly memorialized) — the# formeT
equalling a philosophy of our all-togetherness as an infinite- pro-
gression to an end that ends not; and the latter equalling a philosophy
of our each-apartness as a definite-presence from a beginning thai
hegins yet.

The mystery of the-end, that comes to be not, as realized (ot
Universally evolved), by the dissipating (A)-motion of all-together
directed to a point of absence ahead, at which end, a.s ostensibly
arrived to, the racing (A) -motion negates all-together its motion
and rests as a thing in remainder, called "a matter filling in a hole-
tike absence," no longer mystifies me — and, the mastery of the-
BEGinning, that passes as being yet, as idealized (or individually
involved), by the conservating (E)-motion of each-apart corrected
from a period of pre-sense behind, during which beginning appar-
ently departed from, the tracing (E) -motion affirms each-apart its
motion and continues as a think in reminder, called "a memory filling
Gut a wholelike pre-sense," no longer masters ME.

As all-together, we atoms ainr as one to an end that ends not,
i. e. to an infinite progression.

As each-apart, we items name as many from a beginning that
(begins yet, i. e. from a definite presence.

Were The-Inalienable-Factors of Their-Untanscendible-Sum, as
respectively, ALL-together, The-Atoms, that such sum contains, and,
EACH-apart, The-Items, that such sum contours, to prognosively aim
all-together and diagnosively name each-apart all-and-each their own-
£actoral-use away from such sum, they all hypothetically, would essay
to alienate their inalienability (as its factors), and, they each, apo-
CJieotically, would assay as transcending its untranscendibility (as
their sum).

And, no sooner would they (all-together) essay away from such
£um, than, It, logically abandoned by its arterial-substance, would race
after them to gastronomically retake them, as a hole might yearn and
aim to retake its lost ingredients; and, no sooner would they (each-
apart) assay away from such sum, than^JEt, aesthetically restored by
its veinal-evidence, would trace before £hem to anatomically remake
fhem, as a whole might name and learn to remake its found par-
ticulars.

As retaking its lost ingredients gastronomically, their Sum-Hole
ftpmes to be A-Matter-of -achievement, i. e. ever a hole (thing) con-
fining ingredients (or means) retaken in.

As remaking its found particulars anatomically, their Sum-

14

Whole passes as being A-Memory -of -purpose, i. e. ever a whole (think)
contouring particulars (or meanings) remade out.

Every material-thing equals a-gastronomic-hole-filled^in-with-re-
taken-ingredients, the hole of which equals an autognostic-perception,
and, the ingredients of which equal sensible-stimuli, with the coex-
istent product of both posited as conscious-being-universally-immedi-
€ted, i. e. living-aims-in-statified-remainder.

Every memorial-think equals an-anatoi^ic-whoh-filled-out-with-r^-
made-particulars, the whole of which equals an hypo static-conception,
and, the particulars of which equal mensible animi, with the sue-
cessional conduct of both possessed as being -under stood-individuallyf-
recognized, i. e. language-names-in-ratified-reminder.

Conscious-being and Living- aims mean the same, as, do Being-
understood and Language-names.

As the Sum varies as its Factors, so the Sum of all and EACH
varies as all and each. Antecedent to the aspiration of ALL and
each to become self -distinguished, all and each were one, as summed
Subsequent to such aspiration, all and each were many, as summed.
ALL states and each rates their sum.

As The-Sum of all, Their-Sum, as the quo animo of ALL, equals
infinite-progression.

As The-Sum of each, Their-Sum, as the quoad hoc of each, equals
definite-presence.

As aiming all their self-distinguishment, all aim to change
their (sum) quo-animo-of -infinite-progression to an autognostic-b+-
coming, i. e. an introspective-synthesis-of -conscious-being — an out-
reaching hypothesis.

As naming each their self-distinguishment, each names as chosh
ing their (sum) quoad-hoc-of -definite-presence from an hypostatic-bu-
passing, i. e. a retrospective-analysis-of -being-understood — a baca-
grasping apotheosis.

All outreaching -hypothesis (epiblastically) turns out to be a
prognosed matter of speculative subsequentiality, i. e. an experi-
mental-essay.

Each backgrasping -apotheosis (hypoblastically) turns in to be o
diagnosed memory of apodictic antecedents, u e. an experiential assay.

MOIETAL FUNCTIONS AND SUM FACULTY

For A-motion and E-motion, the moietal-f unctions of JE -motion,
(their sum-faculty), to essay their A-motion and E-motion functivi-
ties apart from iE-motion (their facultate togetherness) , requires that
A-motion and E-motion, contrary to their antecedent method, operate
away from instead of toward uE-motion.

The undertaking, above defined, clearly contemplated a division
of labor, for how could the moieties of a sum operate apart from such
sum, except by a dissolution of their togetherness? And as clearly
contemplates self-distinguishment, for how would the moieties-of-a-
sum operate apart from their sum, except by a resolution of their
apartnesses? And, as clearly contemplates a convision of labor, for
kow should the moieties-of-a-sum operate apart from their sum, except

15

by a rejoinder of their (a) dissolved-togetherness, and, their (b)
resolved-apartnesses? For, as their dissolution was begun (pur-
posedly and proposedly) by power of a common-aim (or means), so
their resolution will continue by genius of a common-mean, and, thus,
their rejoinder must end (achievedly and composedly) by virtue of a
common-name (or meaning).

Beginning their essay as the intropermeative (chemical) pr&-
members of the Logical (holelike) Faculty, that, as constituted by
them, contains their togetherness; and, ending their assay as the
extravasated (mechanical) re-members of the Rational (wholelike)
Facility, that, as instituted by them, contours their apartnesses; as
beginning, they find their essay come to be the object of, and, as end-
ing, they find their assay passing as being the subject of, Their-Com-
mon-Mean, the genius of which grasps the essay of all, as given by
means of sensible-stimulus, or what the essay of all amounts to as
perceived by me (their mean), and, grasps the assay of each, as
given by meanings of mensible-animus, or what the assay of each
amounts to as conceived by me (their mean), and, presto, "the invis-
ible purpose of all from the beginning, as proposed, will be spnsibly
eonscioussed, because of the perceived essay of all (the ingredients),
as aimed, and, will be mensibly understood by reason of the conceived
assay of each (the particulars), as named, of the invigorous achieve-
ment of each at the ending, as composed."

The object-of-ALL as provided to me, in the guise of A-motion,
and, as intellectually perceived by me, called "sensible-stimulus," equals
The Matter-of -Composed- A chievement.

The sub ject-of -each as confided to me, in the guise of E-motion,
and, as conscientiously conceived by me, called "mensible-animus,"
equals Memory-of-Proposed-Purpose.

The-Matter-of-Composed-Achievement, as compiled from the sen-
sible notions provided to me, by the essayive (universal) aim of
all (The Atoms), comes to be the object that the perceptual half of
me assays.

The Memory-of-Proposed-Purpose, as complied with by the men-
sible notions confided to me, by the assayive (individual) name of EACH
(The Item), passes as being the subject that the conceptual half of
me essays.

The importance of me, stands expressed by the first command-
ment; for alone through me, as the feeler of the subjectified essay of
all, and, as such. The-I-vent-of-ALL; and, only beyond me, as the
seer of the objectified assay of each, and, as such, The-Eye-dam-of-
EACH, can and may they, by con vision of their opposed vocations,
come to be, as essayed by all, and pass as being, as assayed by each,
S elf '-Distinguished, Q. E. D., for in me, their quo anime (as all) and
t$xt auoad hoc (as eache), meanly meet and meetly mean their identi-
fied difference of vocation.

ME, the anticipated-point at which they meanly meet, equals the
res medHa of their rejoinder after division of vocation* and, ME, the
participating-period during which they meetly mean, equals the res
gestae of their convision after rejoinder of vocation, or, respectively,

If

posited as The-Conscious-Being, that nexually bridges the interval-
created-by-their-contrapolaric-divisionment-gf -vocation, and possesses
as The-Being-Understood, that sexually attends the contiguity-record-
ed-by-their-protomolar-convisionment-of -vocation.

Hence, in me, as come to be "nought," or come to be (as primarily
self-distinguished) Pure-Simplifications, that, as Hegel says: "arte
nothing," and which the writer, calls: "unrecognized-immediationa-
sensibly-objectified," i. e. Things-anonymously-perceived, or the ga*~
troiiomic-chaos-with-which-intellectual-outreachment-finds-its-holenesd-
filled-in, all correctly rest, as the "autognostic-substance," of the ENQ,
or composed achievement aimed to.

And, thence, in me, by passing as "being," or passing as being
(as ultimately self-distinguished) Sylleptic- Amplifications, that, as the
writer, says: "are beings," and which equal: "unimmediated-recog-
nizances-mensibly-subjectified," i. e. Thinks-synonymously -conceived,
or, the anatomic-cosmos-with-which-conscientious-backgraspment-find»-
its-whoieness-filled-out, each discretely continues, as the "hypostatic-
evidence" of the BEGINNING, or proposed-purpose named from.

"Unrecognized-immediations-sensibly-objectified," agrees as a
phrase with Paul's "substance of things hoped-for."

"Unimmediated-recognizances-mensibly-subjectified," agrees as a
phrase with Paul's "evidence of things unseen."

In ME, the "substance of things hoped for," reduced to its
simplest autognosis, equals "matter."

In ME, the "evidence of things unseen," elaborated to its amplest
hypostasis, equals "memory."

Apostate to their SUM, the moietal-functions (ever inalienable J,
of such sum (ever untranscendible), at the beginning of (all) their
essay, as the result of their dissolution come to be "nought," or pure-
elements, or chaotic-gastronoms, called: matters-becoming; and, dur-
ing the ending of (each) their assay, as the result of their rejoinder
passing as being "beings," or sylleptic-amplifications, or cosmic-ana-
toms, called: memories-bypassing, find considerable relief at being
able to turn from the "shame" of their apostatic private practices fjo
the savior-like "sham" of their hypostatic public pretences, which
explains why every ME, practices the "shames" he would not, and,
pretends the "shams" he is not; for in so far, as every ME has a
chemical gastronomic-half, he stands apostatic and practices "shame";
and, in so far, as every ME has a mechanical anatomic-half, he stands
hypostatic and pretends "shams."

As apostatically a practicer of shame, he preys according to his
infelt (ethnological) yearning, called greed."

As hypostatically a pretender of sham, he prays according to his
outseen (ethical) learning, called "creed."

To destroy me, originally The-Sum-of-their-apposed-vocation, they
all aimed, and by so aiming they created a NOT-ME.

To restore me, ultimately The-Mean-of-their-opposed-vocation&,
they each named, and by so naming they scriptured a YET-ME.

The NOT-ME, created by their ostensible destruction of ME,
was (as purely ingrediented by (all) their arrival thereat), an

17

objectified-hole-that-they-gastronomically-filled-in because of which
infillment by all, such NOT -ME, gives thanks as to a pre-divining
provider of intuited means, or a di vine-pro vidence-that-my-hole- ( as-
conscious-being ) -inwardly-contains.

The YET-ME, scriptured by their apparent restoration of ME,
was (as sylleptically particularized by (e'CH) their departure thence
during), a subjectified-ivhole-anatomically-filled-out., by reason of
which outfillment by each, such YET-ME, takes thinks as from a
re-humanizing confider of innate meanings, or a human-confidence-
that-my-whole- (as-being-understood) -outwardly-contour s.

My NOT -ME, as "conscious-being," contains all that comes to
be contained; hence, my NQT-ME, as "conscious-being," stands un-
transcendible as the ultimate bound of all.

My YET-ME, as "being-understood," contours each that passes
as being contoured; thence, my YET-ME, as "being-understood,"
stands untranscendible as the primary ground of EACH.

Physic-Psychics deals (a) with Consciousness, the circumspherical
Container of all that comes to be sensibly -immediated, and (e) with
Understanding, the equicentric contourer of each that passes as being
fnensib ly -recognized.

Without Consciousness, the uttermost container of all that co-
existently comes to be shown, no thing comes to be self -distinguished
as (universally) aimed by ALL.

Without Understanding, the innermost contourer of each that
successionally passes as being, no think passes as being self -distin-
guished as (individually) named by each.

Between Consciousness, the provider-of-ALL-sensible-means, and,
Understanding, the confider-of-EACH-mensible-meaning, as the-mean-
vf-their-diversity-o] "-vocation, arises me.

THE HOL-OF-INTENT AND THE WHOLE-OF EXTENT

Me, equals the quo animo of all, i. e. the hole-of-intent, to which
All aim as an area of absence, and fill-in (ingrediently) by their
apparent arrival thereat. ME equals an introspected point of antici-
pated becoming.

Me, equals the quoad hoc of each, i. e. the whole-of-extent, from
which each name as an era of pre-sense, and fill-out (particularizedly)
by their csten?ible departure thenceduring. ME equals a retrospective
period of participative bypassing.

As me arises subsequent to their diversity of vocation, as the
Exponential-Mean-of-their-diversity-of-vocation, i. e. as the result of
their contact as diversities of vocation; and, as to ME, so instituted
between them, they play the roles of co-signifiers (i. e. means and
meanings) , evident stands the conclusion: that me, before contact of
them, was an unknown-end aimed to by all and an unshown-beginning
named from by each; which proves that me, prior to contact, was,
despite their diversity of vocations, the non-entity co-sought by both.

Henee, as they antecede me, as pro-institutive diversities, that, by
contact, create me, as the mean-of-their-diversities-of-vocation, th*
question arises : What do they amount to prior to the inauguration of

18

such diversity? The answer to which query runs thus: They were
constituents of the sum-of-their-unity-of -vocation.

Thence, since me, equais: The-Ratiocinative-Mean-of their-diver-
sity -of -vocations, certainly we, equals: The-lntelligent-Sum-of -their-
unity-of -vocation.

Me, equals we (withdrawn from by them in unity), left behind
as abandoned by its intropermeative constituents; and, we, equals
me (returned to by them in diversity) right ahead as restored by its
extravasated instituents.

Me, equals the heart receiving back veinally them (each) that
the same heart discharges arterially (as all) ; and, we, equals the
heart discharging forth arterially them (all), that the same heart
receives back veinally (as each).

The-Heart, as we, equals: MY-I-feeling-the-WILL-of-its-constitu-
ent-ALL; and, as me, The-Heart, equals: MY -EYE -seeing-the- JUDG-
MENT-of -its-instituent-E A CH.

What was the aim of the essay of all, as abandoning the w»-
side of The-Heart? What will be the name of the assay of each,
as restoring the ME-side of The-Heart? Self-Distinguishment.
CONSCIOUSNESS AND UNDERSTANDING

By way of Consciousness, or autognosis, all come to be witnesses
of their objectified (canonized) performance, whencefrom, Conscious-
ness, may be defined, as: The-Chemical-Sum-Beholder-of-ALL-the-con-
stituent-ingredients-ftlling-in-the-holeness-of-such-Sum-Beholder-with--
ALL-their-dissipating-aims-quo-animo.

By way of Understanding, or hypostasis, each passes as being
counselors of their subjectified (organized) agents, whencefrom,
Understanding, may be designated,, as: The-Mechanical-Mean-By-
holder-of-EACH-the-instituent-particulars-filling-out-the-wholeness-of-
such-Mean-Byholder-with-EACH-their-conservated-names-quoad-hoc.

Consciousness, or the holeness of a sum-beholder, equals the gas-
tronic-intaker-of-ALL, and, as such, reveals the nature-of-their-sum
to be a reclamatory pursuer and consumer of all that essay to exhibit
self-distinguished apart from their sum. All alteratedly re-matter
their hole-sum.

Understanding, or the wholeness of a mean byholder, equals the
anatomic-outmaker-of-EACH, and, as such, conceals the spirit-of '-their-
sum as being an interrogatory examiner and co-meaner of each that
assays to inhibit self-distinguishment apart from their-sum, each
alternately re-member their whole-sum.

Autognosis, from Gr. to auton, together; and from Gr.' gnosis,
knowledge (i. e. to know), equals: To-know-together-(as witnessing)-
their-ALL-motion-as-( coexistent) -per formers, or the universal phase
of self-distinguishment.

Hypostasis, from Gr. hypos, under; and from Gr. stasis, to stand,
equals; to-under stand- (as counseling )-their-EACH -motion-as- (succes-
sional) -agents, or the individual phase of self-distinguishment.

The universal-contributions-by-ALL to their Autognois, equals, as
perceived (i. e. materializedly beheld) by such Autognosis, Sensible-
Stimulus.

19

V«. ...

The individual-distributions-of-EACH by their Hypostasis, equals,
as conceived (i.e. memorializedly byheld) by such Hypostasis, Men-
dible- Animus.

Every Autognosis, equals: A-gastronomic-hole-filled-in-with-the-
dissipating - aJM§ - of -ALL - essaying - experimentally - to-show - off-their-
frlf-distinguishments-apart-from-their-sum, or their conscious-con-
tainer.

Every Hypostasis, equals: An-anatomic-whole-filled-out-with-the-
Conservated-names-of-EACH-assaying-experientially-to-know-on-their-
self-distinguishments-apart-from-their-sum, or their understood con-
tour.

ZERO AND HERO

Consciousness, bridges the interval between Autognosis and The-
Motion-of-ALL, i.e. between perception and sensible-stimulus, or be-
tween intellectual-discernment and immediation-of -effects.

Understanding, attends the contiguity between Hypostasis and
The-Motion-of-EACH, i.e. between conception and mensible-animus,
or between conscientious-concernment and recognition-of -consequences.

Having destroyed Their-Sum by dissolution, they (all and EACH)
metamorphose it to a res-medial-interval, the contrapoles of which,
equal: all and each self -distinguished by extremated-separation.
Their-Sum comes to be their ZERO of mean difference.

Having restored Their-Sum by re-solution, they (all and eachj
metempsychose it to a res-gestael-contiguity, the protomolarities of
which, equal: all and each self-distinguished by confluent-rejoinder.
Their-Sum passes as being their HERO of mean identicality.

all plays the role of epiblast.

each plays the role of hypoblast.

their-sum plays the role of CIRCUMSPHERICAL SPACE, as
Ostensibly abandoned by all and each, and plays the role of equicen-
tric-mesoblast, as apparently restored by all and each.

all without eachness equals boundless expansion of freed ele-
ments, or Living -Inclination.

each without allness equals groundless contraction of fixed
eventualities, or Language-Explanation.

Living-Inclination, posits for its moiety of Their-Sum, that area
through which all essayively race along as to a havenward-point-of-
anticipated-becoming, i.e. as through that notness, called Space, i.e. a
holelike excavation that all ingredient, as contained by such Hole,
tnat stands to such ingredients as Matter stands to achievement-pro-
posed.

Language-Explanation, posesses for its moiety of Their-Sum, that
era beyond which each assayively trace around as from an artlike-
period-of-participative-bypassing, i.e. as beyond that yetness, called
Eternity, i.e. a wholelike incubation that EACH particularizes, as con-
toured by such Whole, that stands to such particulars as Memory
stands to purpose-composed.

Thus, Their- Sum-abandoned-by-ALL, comes to be The-Hole-that-
retakes-ALL-g astronomically, as recovering its outracing allness;
and, so, Their-Sum-restored-by-EACH, passes as being The-Whole-that-

20

remakes-E AC H -anatomically, as resovereigning its intracing each-

NESS.

The-Hole-that-retakes-ALL-gastronomically, comes to be because
of its retaken ingredients, a container refilled-in with the aimed-to
self-distinguishments of all, which aims, as autognostically realizing,
equal that massage-of -living -inclination, called: Life per se, ever a
"conscious-being-refilled-in-by-retaken-ingredients."

The-Whole-that-remakes-EACH-anatomically, passes as being, by
reason of its remade particulars, a cantourer refilled-out with the
named-from self-distinguishments of each, which names, as hyposta-
tically idealized, equal that message-of -language-explanation, called:
Knowledge inter alia, ever^a "being-understood-refilled-out-by-remade-
particulars."

Conscious-being-refilled-in-by-retaken-ingredients, equals: A-
Thinglike-Remainder-of-materialized-immediacy, i.e. a bodylike phy-
siologium pendente lite.

Being-understood-refilled-out-by-remade-particulars, equals: A-
Thinklike-Reminder-of-memorialized-recognizance, i.e. a soullike psy-
chorium in perpetuum.

ROOT AND FRUIT

The root-acorn (or all-o-him), by intention, essays to create an
auto-negatation (posited-as-a-point-of -absence) and assays as creating a
lieu-affirmation (possessed-as-a-period-of-pre-sense), of the root-acorn
(or all-o-him) .

And the lieu-affirmation, or the-extended-creature, was void as
without form, and the auto-negation, or the-intended-creator, was
valid but without body.

The extended-creature-void-as-without-form, was the prophecy-of-
a-naturaX-organization-coming-to-be, and, the intendedncreator-vaUd-
but-without-body, was the reminiscence-of-a-spiritual-canonization-
passing -as-being .

And the extended-creature-void-as-without-form, was not-him,
and, the intended-creator-valid-as-without-body, was yet-him. And
the not-him,, was a-univer sal-thing -coming '-to-be, and, the yet-him,
was an-individual-thinkpassing-as-being.

The not-him, or the creaturization that extended from the root-
acorn (or all-o-him), was the-daughter-oak, or the auto-negation,
to which all-o-him essayively aimed, and at which, as apparently ar-
rived, the root- acorn (or all-o-him) rested, as come to be a matter-
of -achievement, with which he was well satisfied?

The yet-him, or the creatorization that intended from the ex-
tended daughter-oak (or not-him), was the-father-acorn, now con-
ceptually working within the daughter-oak, as the prophecy of her
motherhood, whencefrom comes the notions of "ancient-Father" and
l( enceinte-mother" so indelibly stamped on the pages of tradition.

The fruit-acorns (or each-o-them) , half inceived by the R0OT-
ACORN (or all-o-him), reminiscently recall "all-o-him" as the "ancient-
father;' and, half conceived by the daughter-oak (or not-him), pro-
phetically initiate (by, Adamlike, evolving out of themselves an

c ...

EVELIKE-OTHER, and, then through her, as coming to be essentially
involved, pass out to more fruitage via their) "enceinte-mother."

From All-of-him via not-him dia yet-him to each-o-them, runs the
story.

From root-acorn via daughter-oak dia mother-oak to fruit-acorns,
runs the gamut.

Each-o-them reminiscently recalls all-o-him and all-o-him pro-
phetically initiates each-o-them. All-o-him and each-o-them, equal the-
contrapolar-extremes-of-an-experimental-interval between ancestral-
intent and posterital-realization.

Not-him, equals the auto-negation, or the holelike-form-of-an-end-
hopefully-aimed-(i.e. omtogeneratively-yearned)-to-by all-o-him, i.e. a
havenward- (or heavenward) -point-of -anticipation, apparently -filling -
in-with-all-o-him, whencefrom, the holelike form, so filled-in, equals:
Intellective-perception, and, all-o-him-as-so-filling in, equal: an-autog-
nostic-communion-of -sensible-ingredients, gastronomically integrated
in chemical alltogetherness.

Yet-him, equals the lieu-affirmation, or the wholelike-body-of-a-
foeginning-faithfully-named-(i.e. phylospecificatively learned) -from by
each-o-them, i.e. an artlike- (or earthlike )-period-of -participation,
ostensibly -filled-out-ivith-each-of '-them, whencefrom, the wholelike-body
so filled-out, equals: conscientious-conception, and each-of-them-so-
filling-in, equal : an-hypostatic-resurrection-of-mensible-particulars,
anatomically segregated in mechanical eachapartness.

All-o-him, ancestrally prophecies, by his imparted initiative to
such end, the ultimate-mensible-outcome-of -each-o-them (as predes-
tinated during their beginning) ; and, Each-o-them, posteritally remi-
niscenates, by his derived recall from such beginning, the primary-
income-of -all-o-him (as postobituated at their ending).

All-o-him, equals elohim, i.e. the-bachellor-seeking-fatherhood.

Not-him, equals the-primaey-negation, i.e. the-g astronomic-hole,
or the virgin res media.

Yet-him, equals the-ultimate-affirmation, i.e. the-anatomic-
whole, or the foetal res gestae.

Each-o-them, equals the-mean-kinds, the-sonship-seeking-brother-
hood.

The-bachellor-seeking-f atherhood, as aiming to an end, or a hole of
absence, i.e. an excavation, races along a line-of -inclination to impart
substance to a hypothetical-place-of-rest and autognose the matters-
evolved-by-his-essay, i.e. his precaused-effects.

The-sonship-seeking-brotherhood, as naming from a beginning, or
a whole of pre-sense, i.e. an incubation, traces around a plane-of-
explanation as deriving evidence from an apotheotwal-time-of -con-
tinuation and hypostasing the memories-involved-by-his-assay, i.e. his
premotived-consequences.

The awaredness-of -effects, as autognosed by the pre-causative-all-
o-him, and the bewaredness-of-consequences as hypostased by the pre-
motivated-each-o-them, account, respectively, for the properties seen by
the gastronomic-beholder-of -means, and, for the proprieties felt by the
anatomic-byholder-of -meanings.

22

The hopeful-prey er seeks to be supplied with his current-bread (or
gastronomic-property) ; the faithful-prayer seeks to be protected from
current-temptation (or anatomic-impropriety).

The vain-cupidity of the seeker-of -attractive-effects, has its ob-
verse parallel in the naieve-stupidity of the avovder-of-distractive-
consequences.

Looking sees, over the scanned interval between it and its essay-
ively-aimed-to (or willed) end, the not-me-object, that stops its en-
deavorial pro-autognostic outreachment.

Longing feels, under the skinned contiguity between it and its
assayively-named-from (or judged) beginning, the yet-me-subject, that
starts its enthusiasm post-hypostatic-backgraspment.

The not-me-object, that looking, sees over beyond a scanned-*
interval, as seen, comes to an universal-outside-me (i. e. a not-me) and,
the yet-me-subject, that longing, feels under through a skinned-con-
tiguity, as felt, passes as being an-individual-inside-me (i.e. a yet-me).

ME, therefore, equals a-mesoblastic-arachne-mater between an-
epiblastic-dura-mater (or a not me) and a-hypoblastie-pia-mater (or
a yet-me) .

FACT AND ACT

Every act evolves a fact.

Every fact involves an act.

Antecedent to its realized evolution, every fact, equals an end,
aimed to by the-actor, whose act equals such actor's essay to bridge-
the-interval between such actor's-immediacy and such aimed-to end.

Subsequent to its idealized involution, every act, equals a-begin-
ning, named from by the-factor, whose fact equals such factor's
assay, as attending -the-contiguity between such factor's-recognizance
and such named-from beginning.

Subsequent to its realized evolution, every fact, equals a-matter-
of-objectified-becoming, i.e. a sensible- perception, of which, the ex-
pending-act (in the role of sensible-stimulus), autognostically comes
to be THE-EFFECTUALIZED CAUSE.

Antecedent to its idealized involution, every act, equals a-memory-
of-subjectified-bypassing, i.e. a mensible-conception, of which, the
impending- fact (in the role of mensible-animus), hypostatically passes
as being THE-CONSEQUENTIALIZED-MOTIVE.

Every beginning evolves an end.

Every end involves a beginning.

The expiring-prolineal-continuity of a-beginning, provides in-
grediental-means (or gastronomic-content) to its end-in-becoming, by
apparent arrival to such end-in-becoming.

The inspiring-collateral-continuity of the-end, confides particu-
lar-meanings (or anatomic-contour) to its beginning-in-bypassing, by
ostensible departure from such beginning-in-bypassing.

23

<.:

Let every end-in-becoming, as apparently come to be effectually
realized because of the expiring-prolineal-continuity of a-beginning,
and, as autognosed by all its senslble-gastronomic-ingredients, equal:
Definite-Presence, or what every beginning amounts-to, as apparently
self -distinguished, at its end-in-becoming.

Let every beginning-in-bypassing, as ostensibly passing as being
consequentially idealized by reason of the inspiring-collateral-contin-
uity of the-end, and, as hypostased by each of its mensible-anatomic-
particulars, equal: Infinite-Progression, or what every end amounts-
to, as ostensibly self-distinguished, during its beginning-in-bypassing.

Let every matter be void-as-without-form, or recognizance.

Let every memory be valid-but-without-body, or immediacy.

DEFINITIONS

Life: — A-motion, spontaneously aiming to realize the end of its
own beginning, at which end, as apparently arriving, A-motion, real-
izes its own auto-negation as a matter-evolved-by-its-own-dissipating-
essay, which realization, as materialized, equals consciousness-of-its-
own-auto-negation-as-an-othemess, i.e. as a not-me.

Knowledge: — E -motion, simultaneously naming to idealize the
beginning of its own end, during which beginning, as ostensibly depart-
ing, E-motion, idealizes its own lieu affirmation as a memory-involved-
by-its-own-conservating -assay, which idealization, as memorialized,
equals understanding-of-its-own-lieu-affirmation-as-a-sameness, i.e. as
a YET-ME.

As realizing the end of its own beginning, A-motion, materializes
the end of its own beginning, i.e. comes to be conscious of the end, at
which, as beginning, A-motion, experimentally aims and evolvedly
arrives. A-motion, thus operates between its own causative beginning
and its effectualized end, as the res media of its contrapolar vocation,
i.e. as the autognostic-renewer-of-its-own-progressive-evolution.

As idealizing the beginning of its own end, E-motion, memorial-
izes the beginning of its own end, i. e. passes as being the under-
stander of the beginning, during which, as ending, E-motion, experien-
tially names and involvedly departs. E-motion, thus operates between
its own motived end and its consequential beginning, as the res gestae
of its protomolar vocation, i.e. as the hypstatic-reviewer-of-its-pres-
enced-involution.

24

<.: ...

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

This book is due on the date indicated below, or at the
expiration of a definite period after the date of borrowing, as
provided by the rules of the Library or by special arrange-
ment with the Librarian in charge. ,

DATE BORROWED

DATE DUE

DATE BORROWED

DATE DUE

C28(ll4l)M100

QP77 T33

Thayer

OS9?? 7~33