UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LIBRARY SB 355 D75 1857 ^^0 cop,2 (s^^ THE FRIJITS AND FRUIT TREES AMERICA; OB, THE CULTURE, PROPAGATION, AND MANAGEMENT, IN THE GARDEN AND ORCHARD, OP FRUIT TREES GENERALLY: DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL THE FINEST VARIETIES OF FRUIT, NATIVE AND FOREIGN, CULTIVATED IN THIS COUNTRY. BY A. J. DOWNING. C0RHE8P0NDING MEMBEE OF THE EOYAL BOTANIC SOCIETY OP LONDON; AND OF HORTICULTURAL SOCIETIES OF BERLIN; THE LOW COUNTRIES," MASSACHU- SETTS ; PENNSYLVANIA ; INDIANA ; CINCINNATI, KTO. What wondrous life is this I lead? Eipe apples drop about my head ; The luscious clusters of the vine Upon my mouth do crush their wine ; The nectarine and curious peach Into my hands themselves do reach. Mabvsll. RETISED AND COEEBOTED BY CHARLES DOWNING, THIRD THOUSAND, WITH COREECTIONS, NEW YORK: WILEY & HALSTED, No. 351 B E O A D W A Y , 1858. LIBRARY inu?ACfi 4 3'4. 2. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by JOHN WILEY, In tho Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of New York. K. OEAIGITEAD, PniNTEP. AND STEKEOTYPER, Carton IBuiTDincj. 81, 83, and 85 Centre street, N. T. TO MAESHALL V. WILDEK, Esq., PKESIDENT OF THE MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTUEAL SOCIETY, THIS 70LUiIE IS DEDICATED, BY HIS FEIEND, THE AUTBOR. PEEFACE. A MAN bom on the banks of one of tb^s noblest and most fruit- ful rivers in America, and whose best days have been spent in gardens and orchards, may perhaps be pardoned for talking about fruit-trees. Indeed the subject deserves not a few, but many words. "Fine fruit is the flower of commodities." It is the most perfect union of the useful and the beautiful that the earth knows. Trees full of soft foliage; blossoms fresh with spring beauty; and, finally, — fruit, rich, bloom-dusted, melting, and luscious — such arc the treasures of the orchard and the garden, temptingly ofi'ered to every landholder in this bright and sunny, though temperate climate. "If a man," says an acute essayist, "should send for me to come a hundred miles to visit him, and should set before me a basket of fine summer fruit, I should think there was some pro- portion between the labour and the reward." I must add a counterpart to this. He who owns a rood of proper land in this country, and, in the face of all the pomonal riches of the day, only raises crabs and choke-pears, deserves to lose the respect of all sensible men. The classical antiqua- rian must pardon one for doubting if, amid all the wonderful beauty of the golden age, there was anything to equal our deli- cious modern fruits — our honeyed Seckels, and Beurres, our melt- ing Rareripes. At any rate, the science of modern horticulture has restored almost everything that can be desired to give a paradisiacal richness to our fruit-gardens. Yet there are many in utter ignorance of most of these fruits, who seem to live under some ban of expulsion from all the fair and goodly pro- ductions of the garden. Happily, the number is every day lessening. America is a VI PREFACE. young orchard^ but when the planting of fruit-trees in one of the newest States numbers nearly a quarter of a million in a single year ; when there are more peaches exposed in the markets of New York, annually, than are raised in all France; when Ame- rican apples, in large quantities, command double prices in Eu- ropean markets; there is little need for entering into any praises of this soil and climate generally, regarding the culture of fruit. In one part or another of the Union every man may, literally, sit under his own vine and fig tree. It is fortunate for an author, in this practical age, when his subject requires no explanation to show its doAvnright and direct usefulness. When I say I heartily desire that every man should cultivate an orchard, or at least a tree, of good fruit, it is not necessary that I should point out how much both himself and the public will be, in every sense, the gainers. Otherwise I might be obliged to repeat the advice of Dr. Johnson to one of his friends. "If possible," said he, "have a good orchard. I know a clergyman of small income who brought up a family very reputably, which he chiefly fed on apple dump- lings." (!) The first object, then, of this work is to increase the taste for the planting and cultivation of fruit-trees. The second one is to furnish a manual for those who, already more or less informed upon the subject, desire some work of reference to guide them in the operations of culture, and in the selection of varieties. If it were only necessary for me to present for the acceptance of my readers a choice garland of fruit, comprising the few sorts that I esteem of the most priceless value, the space and time to be occupied would be very brief. But this would only imperfectly answer the demand that is at present made by our cultivators. The country abounds with collections of all the finest foreign varieties ; our own soil has produced many native sorts of the highest merit ; and from all these, kinds may be selected which are highly valuable for every part of the country. But opinions diff'er much as to the merits of some sorts. Those which succeed perf3ctly in one section, are sometimes ill-adapted to another. And, finally, one needs some accurate description to know when a variety comes into bearing, if its fruit is genuine, or even to identify an indifferent PREFACE. VU kind, in order to avoid procuring it again. Hence the numter of varieties of fruit that are admitted here. Little by little I have summoned them into my pleasant and quiet court, tested them as far as possible, and endeavoured to pass the most impartial judgment upon them. The verdicts will be found in the following pages. From this great accumulation of names, Pomology has be- come an embarrassing study, and those of our readers who are large collectors will best understand the difficulty — nay, the impossibility of making a work like this perfect. Towards settling this chaos in nomenclature, the exertions of the Horticultural Society of London have been steadily directed for the last twenty years. That greatest of experimental gardens contains, or has contained, nearly all the varieties of fruit, from all parts of the world, possessing the least celebrity. The vast confusion of names, dozens sometimes meaning the same varie- ty, has been by carefal comparison reduced to something like real order. The relative merit of the kinds has been proved and published. In short, the horticultural world owes this So- ciety a heavy debt of gratitude for these laboui*s, and to the science and accuracy of Mr. Robert Thompson, the head of its fruit-department, horticulturists here will gladly join me in bear- ing the fullest testimony. To give additional value to these results, I have adopted in nearly all cases, for fruits known abroad, the nomenclature of the London Horticultural Society. By this means I hope to render universal on this side of the Atlantic the same standard names, so that the difficulty and confusion which have always more or less surrounded this part of the subject may be hereafter avoided. These foreign fruits have now been nearly all proved in this country, and remarks on their value in this climate, de- duced from actual experience, are here given to the public. To our native and local fruits especial care has also been devoted. Not only have most of the noted sorts been proved in the gar- dens here, but I have had specimens before me for comparison, the growth of no less than fourteen of the diflferent States. There are still many sorts, nominally fine, which remain to be collect- ed, compared, and proved ; some of which will undoubtedly de- Vlll PREFACE. serve a place in future editions. To the kindness of pcraolo- gists in various sections of the country I must trust for the detection of errors in the present volume, and for information of really valuable new varieties.* Of the descriptions of fruit, some explanation may be neces- sary. First, is given the standard name in capitals, fol- lowed by the authorities — that is, the names of authors who have previously given an account of it by this title. Below this are placed, in smaller type, the various synonymes^ or lo- cal names, by which the same fruit is known in various coun- tries or parts of the country. Thus, on page 429, is the fol- lowing : Flemish Beauty. Lind. Thomp. Belle de Flandres. I Poire Davy. Bosch Nouvelle. | Imperatrice de France. Bosch. I Foudant Du Bois. Bosc Sire. | Boschpeer. Beurre Spence {erroneously). By this is signified, first, that Flemish Beauty is the standard name of the pear ; secondly, that it has been previ- ously described by Lindley and Thompson ; thirdly, that the others — synonymes — are various local names by which the Flemish Beauty is also known in various places ; and, lastly, that by the latter name — Beurre Spence — it is incorrectly known in some collections, this name belonging to another distinct pear. It is at once apparent that one of the chief points of value of a book like this, lies in the accuracy with which these synonymous names are given — since a person might, in looking over difierent catalogues issued here and abroad, suppose that all ten of the above are diff'erent varieties — when they are really all diflferent names for a single pear. In this record of synonymes, I have therefore availed myself of the valuable experience of the Lon- * It is well to remark that many of the so-called new varieties, especially from the West, prove to be old and well-known kinds, slightly altered in appearance by new soil and different climate. A new variety must possess very superior qualities to entitle it to regard, now that we haye so many fine fruits in our collections. PREFACE. IX don Horticultural Society, and added all the additional in- formation in my own possession. Many of the more important varieties of fruit are shown in outline. I have chosen this method as likely to give the most correct idea of the form of a fruit, and because I believe that the mere outline of a fruit, like a profile of the human face, will often be found more characteristic than a highly finished portrait in colour. The outlines have been nearly all traced directly from fruits grown here. They are from specimens mostly below the average size. It has been the custom to choose the largest and finest fruits for illustration — a practice very likely to mislead. I believe the general character is better ex- pressed by specimens of medium size, or rather below it. It only remains for me to present my acknowledgments to the numerous gentlemen, in various parts of the country, who have kindly furnished information necessary to the completion of the work. The names of many are given in the body of the vol- ume. But to the following I must especially tender my thanks, for notes of their experience, or for specimens of fi'uits to solve existing doubts. In Massachusetts, to Messrs. M. P. Wilder, S. G. Per- kins, J. P. Gushing, B. V. French, S. Downer, and G. M. Ho- vey, of Boston ; John G. Lee, J. M. Ives, the late Robert Man- ning and his son R. Manning, of Salem ; and Gtis Johnson, of Lynn. In Gonnecticut, to Dr. E. W. Bull, of Hartford ; Mr. S. Ly- man, of Manchester; and the Rev. H. S. Ramsdell, of Thomp- son. In New York, to Messrs. David Thomas, of Aurora ; J. J. Thomas, of Macedon ; Luther Tucker, and Isaac Denniston, of Albany ; Alexander Walsh, of Lansingburgh ; T. H. Hyatt, of Rochester : R. L. Pell, of Pelham ; G. Downing, of New- burgh ; and Wm. H. Aspinwall, of Staten Island. In Ohio, to Professor Kirtland, of Gleveland ; Dr. Hildreth, of Marietta ; and Messrs. N. Long worth, G. W. Elliott, and A. H. Ernst, of Gincinnati. In Indiana, to the Rev. H. W. Beecher, of Indianapolis. In New Jersey, to Messrs. Thomas Hancock, of Burlington, and J. W. Hayes, of Newark. In Pennsylvania, to Mr. Frederick X PREFACE. Brown, and Col. Carr, of Philadelphia. In Maryland, to Lloyd N. Rogers, Esq., of Baltimore. In G'^orgia, to James Camak Esq., of Athens. A. J. D. IIiGiiLAXD Gardens, ) Kewburgh, N. r., May, 1W6. j PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION, In preparing this revised and corrected edition of the " Fruits and Fruit Trees of America," no alteration has been made in the general principles of cultivation and propagation, and but little in the descriptions of those varieties that are retained ; but some, after repeated trial, having proved unworthy of general cultivation, have been reduced and put in a class of inferior sorts ; some of which, however, have advocates, and succeed in particular soils and localities. Many new ones of "very good" and "best" quality have been added ; some well proved, and others partially so, requir- ing more time to give their true merits ; some giving promise of excellence, others may prove, when fully tested, but of in- ferior value. Something has been done towards ascertaining synonymes and identifying disputed varieties, and great numbers of speci- mens compared from various sources; but it requires much time and long-continued examinations to accomplish even a little by private individuals, where there is so much confusion as now exists. Order and accuracy can only be arrived at when the different varieties are well grown in the same soil and locality, which could only be realized in an experimental garden on a large scale. To the many persons in various parts of the country who have kindly furnished notes and specimens of numerous fruits, we tender our acknowledgments. In Massachusetts, to John Milton Earl, Samuel Colton, George A. Chamberlain, and George Jacques, Worcester ; J. C. Stone, Shrewsbury ; F. Burr, Hingham ; Asa Clement, Lowell ; Willis P. Sargent, West Araesbury ; 0. V. Hills, Xll PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION, Leominster ; Dr. L. AV. Puffer, Nortli Bridgewater ; Joel Knapp, Sutton ; and Joseph Merrill, Danversport. In Connecticut, to S. D. Pardee and Prof. Eli Ives, New llaveu ; Sheldon Moore, Kensington ; George Seymour, Nor- walk ; G. W. Gager, Sharon, and P. S. Beers, Southville. In Vermont, to Chauncey Goodrich and Rev. John Wheeler, Burlington ; J. M. Ketchum, Brandon ; G. W. Harman, Ben- nington ; Buel Landon, Grand Isle, and Albert Bresee, Hub- bardton. In New York, to Dr. James Fountain, Jefferson Valley; S. P. Carpenter, New Rochelle ; William R. Prince, Flushing ; Dr. C. W. Grant, A. Saul, Newburgh ; J. G. Sickles, Stuyvesant ; Elisha Dorr and Prof. James Hall, Albany ; J. W^. Bailey, Plattsburgh ; J. Battey, Keeseville ; J. C. Hastings, Clinton ; Matthew Mackie, Clyde ; Isaac Hildreth, Watkins ; T. C. Maxwell and Brothers, and W. T. & E. Smith, Geneva ; Ell- wanger & Barry, H. E. Hooker, A. Frost & Co., and James H. W^atts, Rochester ; J. B. Eaton, Buffalo. In New Jersey, to Louis E. Berckraans, Plainfield ; William Reid, Elizabethtown ; James McLean, Roadstown. In Pennsylvania, to Dr. W. D. Brinckle, Philadelphia ; Chas. Kessler and Daniel B. Lorah, Reading ; Dr. J. K. Eshleman and Jonathan Baldwin, Downingtown ; Thomas Harvey, Jen- nerville ; Wm. G. Waring, Boalsburg ; Samuel Miller, Leba- non ; David Miller, Jun., Cumberland ; D. H. Wakefield, Brownsville ; Josiah Hoopes, Westchester. In Ohio, to Robert Buchanan, Cincinnati ; D. C. Richmond, Sandusky ; A. Thompson, Delaware ; M. B. Batcham, Colum- bus, and N. L. Wood, Smithfield. In Illinois, to Dr. J. A. Kennicott, West Northfield ; F. K. Phoenix and C. R. Overman, Bloomington; Arthur Bryant, Princeton ; Tyler McWhorter, Pomeroy. In Indiana, to Reuben Regan, Nicholsonville ; John C. Teas, Raysville ; Wm. II. Loomis, Fort Wayne. In Maine, to S. L. Goodall, Saco. In New Hampshire, to Robert Wilson, Keene; and Nathan Norton, Greenland. In Canada West, to James Dougall, Windsor ; and William H. Read, Port Dalhousie. In Michigan, to T. T. Lyon, Plymouth ; Dr. D. K. Underwood, Adrian. In Iowa, to Henry Avery, PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION. Xlll Burlington, In Delaware, to Edward T^tnall, Wilmington. /3 In Virginia, to H. R. Koby, Fredericksburgh. In North Caro- lina, to G. W. Johnson, Milton. In Kentucky, to J. S. Downer, Elkton ; and S. J. Leavell, Trenton. In Missouri, to George Hussman, Herrman. In Washington, to John Saul. In Georgia, to William N. White and Dr. M. A. Ward, Athens ; Richard C. Peters and Wm. H. Thurmond, Atlanta, and J. Van Beuren, Clarksville, Charles Downing. ABBREVIATIONS AND BOOKS aUOTED. Arboretum Briiannicum, or the Trees and Shrubs of Britain, pictorially and botanically delineated, and scientifically and popularly described by J. C. Loudon. London, 1845, 8 vols. 8vo. Annales de la Societe cV Horticulture de Paris. — Paris. In monthly Nos. 8vo. 1827 to 1845. Annales de fltistltui de Fromont. Par le Chevaher Soulange Bodin. Paris, Svo. 1829 to 1834, 6 vols. Adlum. A Memoir on the cultivation of the Yine in America, and the best mode of making Wine. By John Adlum. 12mo. Washing- ton, 1828. Bon Jard. Le Bon Jardinier, pour TAnnee 1844. Contenant des prin- cipes generaux de culture, etc. Par A. Poiteau and M. Vilmorin, Paris. 12mo. — yeaiiy volume. Bushy. A Visit to the principal Vineyards of France and Spain. By Jas. Busby. New York, 12mo. 1835. Bridgeman. The Young Gardener's Assistant. By Thomas Bridgeman. Tenth ed. New York, 1844, 8vo. Baumann's Gat. Catalogue dcs Vegetaux en tout genre disponible dans TEtabhssemeut des Freres Baumaun, a Bol wilier, 1842. Coxe. A View of the Caltivation of Fruit Trees in the United States, and of the Management of Orchards and Cider. By AVilliam Coxe. Philadelphia, 8vo., 1817. Chaxital. Chemistry applied to Agriculture. By John Anthony Chaptal. American ed., 12mo. Boston, 1835. Gobbett. The American Gardener. By Wm. Cobbett. London, 1821, 12mo. Goleman. Eeports on the Agriculture of Massachusetts. By Henry Cole- man. Boston, Svo. 1840-41. JDom. Gard. The Domestic Gardener's Manual. By John Towers. Lon- don, 1839, 8vo. Dohamel. Traite des Arbres Fruitiers, par M. Duhamel Dumonceau. Paris. 1768, 2 vols. 4to. Gultivator. The Cultivator, a monthly journal of Agriculture, &c., l^'dited by Luther Tucker. Albany, continued to the present time, 8vo. Diel. Versuch einer Systematischen Beschreibung in Deutschland ,v;or- handener Kernobstsorten. Von Dr. Aug. Freidr. Ad, Diel. 12mo. 24 vols. 1799—1825. De Gandolle. Physiologie Vegetale, ou Exposition des Forces et des Fonc- tions vitales des Vegetaux. Par A. P. De CandoUe. Paris, 1832, 3 vols. 8vo. , Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Vegetabilis. Paris, 1818 — 1830, 4 vols. Svo. UAlbret. Cours Theorique et Pr itique de la Taille des Arbres Fruitiers Par D'Albret. Paris, 1840 8vo. / XVI ABBREVIATIONS AND BOOKS QUOTED. Forsyth. A Treatise on the Culture and Management of Fruit-trees. By William Forsyth, 7lh ed. London, 1824, 8vo. y Floy. Lindley's Guide to the Orchard. American ed. with additions by / Michael Floy. New York, 1833, 12mo. ^^ Fcssenden. New American Gardener, containing practical directions for /^ the culture of Fruits and Vegetables. By Thos. E. Fessenden. Boston, 1828, 12mo. y^ Gard. Mag. The Gardener's Magazine, conducted by J. C. Loudon, in '^ monthly nos. 8vo., 19 vols, to 1844, London. ^ Gard. Ghron. The Gardener's Chronicle, and Agricultural Gazette, ed- /^ ited by Professor Lindley, a weekly journal, 4to. 5 vols. 1844 to the present time. ylloare. A Practical Treatise on the cultivation of the Grape Vine on y^ open walls. By Clement lloare. London, 1840, 12mo. Hart. Soc. Gat. See fhomx>son. Eori. Trans. Transactions of the Horticultural Society of London. Lon- don, 4to. 1815, and at intervals to the present time. Hooker. Pomona Londonensis. ^j William Hooker. London, 1813, 4to. Hayioard. The Science of Horticulture. By Joseph Haywardl London, 1824, 8vo. Harris. A Report on the Insects of Massachusetts injurious to Vegeta- tion. By Dr. T. W. Harris. Cambridge, 1841, 8vo. Hov. Mag. or H. M. The Magazine of Horticulture, Botany and Rural Affairs. Conducted by C. M. Hovey. Boston, 8vo. monthly nos. 1834 to the present time. Johnston. Lectures on Agricultural Chemistry and Geology. By Jas. W. F. Johnston. American ed. New York, 12mo. 2 vols. 1842. Jard. Fruit. Le Jardin Fruitier, par Louis Noisette, 2 ed. Paris, 1839, 2 vols. 8vo. y Knight. Various articles in the London Horticultural Transactions. By y^ Thomas Andrew Knight, its late President. Xnoop. Pomologie, ou description des Arbres Fruitiers. Par Joh. Herm. ^'^ Knoop. Amsterdam, 1771, Fol. ^ Ken. The New American Orchardist. By WiUiam Kenrick, Boston, '"'^ 1844. Kollar. A Treatise on Insects injurious to Gardeners, Foresters and Farmers. By Vincent Kollar, Notes by Westwood. London, 1840, 12mo. Langley. Pomona, or the Fruit Garden Illustrated. By Batty Langley, London, 1729, Folio. ^^^ Loudon. An Encyclopedia of Gardening. By J. C. Loudon, London, -^ 1835, 1 thick vol. 8vo. . An Encyclopedia of Plants. By the same. London, 1836, 1 thick vol. 8vo. . An Encyclopedia of Agriculture. By the same. London, 1831, 1 thick vol. 8vo. Hortus Britannicus. A Catalogue of all the plants in Britain, by the same. London, 8vo. . The Suburban Horticulturist, by the same. London, 1842, 8vo. . The Suburban Gardener and Villa Companion. By the same. London, 1838, 1842, 8vo. . Arboretum et Fruticetum Britannicum. By the same. 8 vols. London, 1838, 8vo y^ LitUg. Organic ChemistJ y in its applications to Agriculture and Physi- /^ ology. By Justus Liebig. American ed., Cambridge, 1844, 12mo. Lind. A Guide to the 0» jhard and Kitchen Garden, or an account of the ^^ Fruits and Vegetables cultivated in Great Britain. By George ^ Lindley. London, 1831, 8vo. ABBREVIATIONS AND BOOKS QUOTED. XVU Lindley. Ai. Introduction to Botany, By John Lindlej. London, 1832, 8vo. . An Introduction to tiie Natural System of Botany. By John Lindley. London, 1835, 2d ed., 8vo. . . British Fruits. See Pomological Magazine — it is the samie work. . The Theory of Horticulture, or an attempt to explain the Ope- ration of Gardening upon Physiological Principles. By John Lindley. London, 8vo., 1840. '■ — . The same work with Notes by A. Gray and A, J, Do\STiing. New York, 1841, 12mo. L or Linncms. • Species Plantarum, 5th ed. Berlin, 1810, 5 vols. 8vo. Ijelieur. La Pomone Frangaise, ou Traite de la Culture Frangaise, et de la Taille des Arbres Fruitiers. Par le Compte Lelieur. Paris, 1811, 8vo. ^^ Man, The New England Fruit Bqok. By R. Manning, 2d ed., enlarged by John M. Ives, Salem, 1844, 12mo. .. Man. in H. M. Manning's articles in Hovey's Magazine. "'^ ,Mill The Gardener's and Botanist's Dictionary. By Philip Miller. E,e- tr vised by Professor Martyn. London, 1819, 2 vols. 8vo. ^0^ Michaux. The North American Sylva, or Descriptions of the Forest Trees of the United States, Canada, &e. By A. F. Michaux. Paris, 1819, 3 vols. 8vo. M^Iniosh. The Orchard and Fruit Garden. By Charles Mcintosh. Lon- ^^'^ don, 1819, 12mo. K Duh. (The New Duhamel) Traite des Arbres Fruitiers de Duhamel. Nouvelle edition augmentee, etc. Par MM. Poiteau et Turpm, Paris. 5 vols, folio, 1808, et seq. ^ Nois. See Jardin Fruitier. New England Farmer. A weekly periodical, devoted to Agriculture, Hor- ^ ticulture, &c. Boston, 4to., continued to the present time. ^ 0. Duh. See Duhamel Pom. Mag. or P. M. Tiie Pomological Magazine, or Figures and Descrip- tions of the most important varieties of Fruit cultivated in Great Britain. London, 1828, 3 vols. 8vo. ^ Pom. Man. The Pomological Manual. By William R. Prince. New ■^ York, 1831, 2 vols. 8vo. Prince. A Treatise on the Vine. By William R. Prince. New York, 1830, 8vo. Prince. A short Treatise on Horticulture. By WiUiam Prince. New York, 1828, 12mo. PhiUips. Pomarium Britannicum ; an Historical and Botanical Account -^^ of the Fruits known in Great Britaua, By Henry PhiUips. Lon- don, 1820, 8vo. Poit. or Poiteau. Pomologie Prangaise. Recueil des plus beaux Fruits, cultives en France. Par Poiteau. Paris, 1838, and continued in 4to. numbers. ^.- Elvers. A Descriptive Catalogue of Pears, cultivated by T. Rivers. Saw- ^ bridge worth, 1843-44, pamphlet, 8vo. Eon. or Ronalds. Pyrus Mains Brentfordienses, or a concise description of Selected Apples, with a figure of each sort. By Hugh Ronalds. London, 1831, 4to. Bay. Historia Plantarum, a John Ray, M.D. London, 3 vols, folio, 1636—1704. Revue Horticole. Journal des Jardiniers et Amateurs. Audot, Editeur Paris, 1844, et chaque mois, 12mo. Switzer. The Practical Fruit Gardener. By Stephen Switzer, 1724^ 8vo. XVlll ABBREVIATIONS AND BOOKS QUOTED. Tarrey & Gray. A Flora of North America, containing abridged descrip- tions of all the known plants growing north of the Gulf of Mexico, By John Torrey, ^LD., and Asa (iraj, M.D. New York, vol. 1st, 8v'0. New York, 18-iO, and still in progress. Thomp. A Catalogue of the Fruits Cultivated in the Garden of the Hor- ticultural Society of Loudon, 3d ed., London, 1842. [Prepared with great care by Robert Thompson, the head of the Fruit De- partment.] Thacher. The American Orchardist. By James Thacher, M.D. Boston, 1822, 8vo. Van Mons. Arbres Fruitiers, ou Pomologie Beige Experimentale et Rai- .sonnee. Par J. R. Van Mons. Louvain, 18.35 — 1836, 2 vols. 12mo. . Catalogue dos Arbres Fruitiers, Dcscriptif, Abrege. Par J. B. Van Mons. Louvain, 1823. Wilder, MSS. Manuscript Notes on Fruits. By M. P. Wilder, Esq., President of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES. •'AL Pom. Album de Pomologie ; in which the fruits of Belgium are figured and described. An. Pom. Annals of Pomology, a periodical published by royal commis- sion, in which choice fruits are figured and described. C. H. A. Cornice of Horticulture of Angers. Hort. The Horticulturist of Rural Art and Rural Taste, II vols. Cole. American Fruit Book, by S. W. Cole, Boston, Mass. Thomas. American Fruit Culturist, by John J. Thomas, Union Springs, New York. Barry. The Finjit Garden, by P. Barry, Rochester, New York. Waring. The Fruit Grower's Hand-Book, by "Wm. G. Waring, Boals- burg, Pa. Elliott. American Fruit Gro-wer's Guide, by F. R. Elliott, Cleveland, 0. Whitens Gard. Gardening for the South, by Wm. N. White, Athens, Ga. Hov. Mag. The Magazine of Horticulture, by C. M. Hovey, Boston, Mass. 22 vols. N. Y. Hort. Rev. New York Horticultural Review, by C. Reagles, New York. Ad InL Rep. Ad Interim Reports of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society. -Inter. Rep. Intermediate native fruit reports of the American Pomologi- cal Society. Ga. Pom. S. Rep. Ad Interim Reports of the Georgia Pomological Soci- ety. Me. Pom. S. Rep. Annual Report of the Maine Pomological Society. ^ Trans. A. Pom. S. Transactions of the American Pomological Society. "Biv. Cat. Catalogue of A. Bivort, Belgium. -Pap. Cat. Catalogue of Ad. Papelen, Belgium. .Leroy's Cat. Descriptive Catalogue by Andre Leroy, Angers, Franco. Pr. Cat Descriptive Catalogue of Fruits, by Wra. R. Prince, Flushing, New York. L. E. Berckman's MS. Manusf ript Notes, by Louis E. Berckman, Plain- field, New Jersey. ABBREVIATIONS AND BOOKS QUOTED. XIX W. D. BrincUe's MS. Manuscript Notes, by W. D. Brinckle, Philadel- phia R. Manning'' s MS. Manuscript Notes, by Robert Manning, Salem, Mass. A. H. Ernst MS. Manuscript Notes, by A. H. Ernst, Cincinnati, Ohio. R. Buchanan MS. Manuscript Notes, by Robert Buchanan, Cincinnati, Ohio. Wm. N. White MS. Manuscript Notes, by "Wm. N. White, Athens, Ga. J. Van Bmren's MS. Manuscript Notes, by J. Van Beuren, Clarksville, Greorgia. E. R. Rohey MS. Manuscript Notes, by H. R. Robey, Fredericksburg, Virginia. Samuel Miller^ Jr., MS. Manuscript Notes, by Samuel Miller, Jr., Cum- berland, Pa. J. S. Dovmer MS. Manuscript Notes, by J. S. Downer, Elkton, Ky. FRUITS AND FRUIT TREES. CHAPTER I. THE PRODUCTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF FRUIT. In our survey of the culture of fruits let us begin at the be- ginning. Gradual amelioration, and the skilful practice of the cultivator, have so filled our orchards and gardens with good fruits, that it is necessary now to cast a look back at the types from which these delicious products have sprung. In the tropical zone, amid the surprising luxuriance of vege- tation of that great natural hothouse, nature offers to man, almost without care, the most refreshing, the most delicious, and the most nutritive fruits. The Plantain and Banana, excellent either raw or cooked, bearing all the year, and producing upon a rood of ground the sustenance of a family ; the refreshing Guava and Sapodilla ; the nutritious Bread-fruit ; such are the natural fruit trees of those glowing climates. Indolently seated under their shade, and finding a refreshing coolness both from their ever-verdant canopy of leaves, and their juicy fruits, it is not here that we must look for the patient and skilful cul- tivator. But, in the temperate climates, nature wears a harsher and sterner aspect. Plains bounded by rocky hills, visited not only by genial warmth and sunshine, but by cold winds and seasons of ice and snow ; these are accompanied by sturdy forests, whose outskirts are sprinkled with crabs and wild cherries, and festooned with the clambering branches of the wild grape. These native fruits, which at first off'er so little to the eye, or the palate, are nevertheless the types of our garden varieties. Destined in these climates to a perpetual struggle with nature, it is here that we find man ameliorating and transforming her. Transplanted into a warmer aspect, stimulated by a richer soil, reared from selected seeds, carefiilly pruned, sheltered and watched, by slow degrees the sour and bitter crab expands into a Golden Pippin, the wild pear loses its thorns and becomes a Bergamotte or a Beurre, the Almond is deprived of its bitterness, and the dry and flavorless Peach is at length a tempting and delicious fruit. It is thus only in the face of obstacles, in a climate where nature is not prodigal of perfections, and in the 1 2 PRODUCTION OF NEW VARIETIES. midst of thorns and sloes, tliat man the gardener arises and forces nature to yield to his art. These improved sorts of fruit which man every where causes to share his civilization, bear, almost equally with himselt^ the impress of an existence removed from the natural state. When reared from seeds they always show a tendency to return to a wilder form, and it seems only chance when a new seedling is equal to, or surpasses its parent. Removed from their natui'al form, these artificially created sorts are also much more liable to diseases and to decay. From these facts arises the fruit-garden, with its various processes of grafting, budding and other means of continuing the sort ; with also its sheltered aspects, warm bor- ders, deeper soils, and all its various refinements of art and culture. In the whole range of cares and pleasures belonging to the garden, there is nothing more truly interesting than the produc- tion of new varieties of fruit. It is not, indeed, by sowing the seeds that the lover of good fruit usually undertakes to stock his garden and orchard with fine fruit trees. Raising new varieties is always a slow, and, as generally understood, a most uncertain mode of bringing about this result. The novice plants and care- fully watches his hundred seedling pippins, to find at last, per- haps, ninety-nine worthless or indifterent apples. It appears to him a lottery, in which there are too many blanks to the prizes. He, therefore, wisely resorts to the more certain mode of grafting from well known and esteemed sorts. Notwithstanding this; every year, under the influences of gar- den culture, and often without our design, we find our fruit trees reproducing themselves ; and occasionally, there springs up a new and delicious sort, whose merits tempt us to fresh trials after perfection. To a man who is curious in fruit, the pomologist who views with a more than common eye, the crimson cheek of a peach, the delicate bloom of a plum, or understands the epithets, rich, melt- ing, buttery, as applied to a pear, nothing in the circle of culture can give more lively and unmixed pleasure, than thus to pro- duce and to create — for it is a sort of creation — an entirely new sort, which he believes will prove handsomer and better than any thing that has gone before. And still more, as varieties which originate in a certain soil and climate, are found best adapted to that locality, the production of new sorts of fruit, of high merit, may be looked on as a most valuable, as well as interesting result. Besides this, all the fine new fruits, which, of late, figure so conspicuously in the catalogues of the nurseries and fruit gar- dens, have not been originated at random and by chance efi'orts. Some of the most distinguished pomologists have devoted years to the subject of the improvement of fruit trees by seeds, and have attained if not certain results, at least some general BY SEED. 3 laws, which greatly assist us in this process of amelioration. Let us therefore examine the subject a little more in detail. In the wild state, every genus of trees consists of one or more species, or strongly marked individual sorts ; as, for example, the white birch and the black birch ; or, to confine ourselves more strictly to the matter in hand, the different species of cherry, the wild or bird cherry, the sour cherry, the mazzard cherry, tfec. These species, in their natural state, exactly reproduce themselves ; to use a common phrase, they " come the same" from seed. This they have done for centuries, and doubtless will do forever, so long as they exist under natural circumstan- ces only. On the other hand, suppose we select one of these species of fruit-trees, and adopt it into our gardens. So long as we culti- vate that individual tree, or any part of it, in the shape of suck- er, graft, or bud, its nature will not be materially altered. It may, indeed, through cultivation, be stimulated into a more luxu- riant growth ; it w^ill probably produce larger leaves and fruit ; but we shall neither alter its fruit in texture, color or taste. It will always be identically the same. The process of amelioration hegins with a new generation, and hy soicing the seeds. Some species of tree, indeed, seem to re- fuse to yield their wild nature, never producing any variation by seed ; but all fruit-trees and many others, are easily domesti- cated, and more readily take the impress of culture. If we sow a quantity of seed in garden soil of the common black mazzard cherry, [Cerasus avium,) we shall find that, in the leaves and habit of growth, many of the seedlings do not entire- ly resemble the original speci ,*«. When they come into bearing, it is probable we shall also find as great a diversity in the size, color and flavor of the fruit. Each of these individual plants, diff'ering from the original type, (the mazzard,) constitutes a new variety ; though only a few, perhaps only one, may be su- perior to the original species. It is worthy of remark, that exactly in proportion as this re- production is frequently repeated, is the change to a great va- riety of forms, or new sorts increased. It is likely indeed, that to gather the seeds fi-om a wild mazzard in the woods, the in- stances of departure from the form of the original species would be very few ; while if gathered from a garden tree, itself some time cultivated, or several removes from a wild state, though still a mazzard, the seedlings will show great variety of cha- racter. Once in the possession of a variety, which has moved out of the natural into a more domesticated form, we have in our hands the best material for the improving process. The fixed original habit of the species is broken in upon, and this variety which we have created, has always afterwards some tendency to 4 PRODUCTION OF NEW VARIETIES. make further departures from the original form. It is true that all or most of its seedlings will still retain a likeness to the parent, but a few will differ in some respects, and it is by seizing upon those which show symptoms of variation, that the improver of vegetable races founds his hopes. We have said that it is a part of the character of a species to produce the same from seed. This characteristic is retained even where the sporty (as gardeners term it) into numberless varieties is greatest. Thus, to return to cherries, the Kentish or common pie-cherry is one species, and the small black mazzard another, and although a great number of varieties of each of these species have been produced, yet there is always the like- ness of the species retained. From the first we may have the large and rich Mayduke, and from the last the sweet and lus- cious Black-Hearts ; but a glance will show us that the duke cherries retain the distinct dark foliage, and, in the fruit, some- thing of the same flavor, shape and color of the original spe- cies ; and the heart cherries the broad leaves and lofty growth of the mazzard. So too, the currant and gooseberry are differ- ent species of the same genus ; but though the English goose- berry growers have raised thousands of new varieties of this fruit, and shown them as large as hen's eggs, and of every variety of form and color, yet their efforts with the gooseberry have not produced any thing resembling the common currant. Why do not varieties produce the same from seed ? Why if we plant the stone of a Green Gage plum, will it not always produce a Green Gage ? This is often a puzzling question to the practical gardener, while his every day experience forces him to assent to the fact. We are not sure that the vegetable physiologists will under- take to answer this query fully. But in the mean time we can throw some light on the subject. It will be remembered that our garden varieties of fruits are not natural forms. They are the artificial productions of our culture. They have always a tendency to improve, but they have also another and a stronger tendency to return to a natural, or wild state. " There can be no doubt," says Dr. Lindley, " that if the arts of cultivation were abandoned for only a few years, all the annual varieties of plants in our gardens would disappear and be replaced by a few original wild forms." Be- tween these two tendencies, therefore, the one derived from nature, and the other impressed by culture, it is easily seen how little likely is the progeny of varieties always to reappear in the same form. Again, our American farmers, who raise a number of kinds of Indian corn, very well know that, if they wish to keep the sorts distinct, they must grow them in different fields. Without this precaution they find on planting the seeds produced on the THE VAN MONS METHOD. 5 yellow corn plants, that they have the next season a progeny, not of yellow corn alone, but composed of every color and size, yellow, white and black, large and small, upon the farm. Now many of the varieties of fruit trees have a similar power of intermixing with each other while in blossom, by the dust or pollen of their flowers, carried through the air, by the action of bees and other causes. It will readily occur to the reader, in considering this fact, what an influence our custom of plant- ing the difi'erent varieties of plum or of cherry together in a garden or orchard, must have upon the constancy of habit in the seedlings of such fruits. But there is still another reason for this habit, so perplexing to the novice, who, having tasted a luscious fruit, plants, watches and rears its seedling, to find it, perhaps, wholly different in most respects. This is the influence of grafting. Among the great number of seedling fruits produced in the United States, there is found occasionally a variety, perhaps a plum or a peach, which will nearly always reproduce itself from seed. From some for- tunate circumstances in its origin, unknown to us, this sort, in becoming improved, still retains strongly this habit of the natu- ral or wild form, and its seeds produce the same. We can call to mind several examples of this ; fine fruit trees whose seeds have established the reputation in the neighborhood of fidelity to the sort. But when a graft is taken from one of these trees, and placed upon another stock, this grafted tree is found to lose its singular power of producing the same by seed, and becomes like all other worked trees. The stock exercises some, as yet, unexplained power, in dissolving the strong natural habit of the variety, and becomes like its fellows, subject to the laws of its artificial life. When we desire to raise new varieties of fruit, the common practise is to collect the seeds of the finest table fi^uits — those sorts whose merits are every where acknowledged to be the highest. In proceeding thus we are all pretty well aware, that the chances are generally a hundred to one against our obtain- ing any new variety of great excellence. Before we offer any advice on rearing seedlings let us examine briefly the practice and views of two distinguished horticulturists abroad, who have paid more attention to this subject than any other persons what- ever ; Dr. Van Mons of Belgium, and Thos. Andrew Knight, Esq., the late President of the Horticultural Society of London. The Van Mons Theory. Dr. Van Mons, Professor at Louvain, devoted the greater part of his life to the amelioration of fruits. His nurseries contained in 1823, no less than two thousand seedlings of merit. His perseverance was indefatigable, ard experimenting mainly on 0 PRODUCTION OF NEW VARIETIES. Pears, he succeeded in raising an immense number of new varieties, of high excellence. The Beurre Diel, De Louvain, Frederic of Wurtemberg, erfect seeds for continuing the species. It is the object of cul- ture therefore, to subdue, or enfeeble this excess of vegetation ; to lessen the coarseness of the tree ; to diminish the size of the seeds ; and to refine the quality and increase the size of the flesh or pulp. There is always a tendency in our varieties of fruit trees to return by their seeds towards a wild state. This tendency is most strongly shown in the seeds borne by old fruit-trees. And " the older the tree is of any cultivated variety of Pear," says Dr. Van Mons, "the nearer will the seedlings, raised from it, approach a wild state, without however ever being able to return to that state." On the other hand, the seeds of a young fruit tree of a good sort, being itself in the state of amelioration, have the least ten- dency to retrograde, and are the most likely to produce improved sorts. Again, there is a certain limit to perfection in fruits. When this point is reached, as in the finest varieties, the next genera- tion will more probably produce bad fruit, than if reared from seeds of an indifi'erent sort, in the course of amelioration. While, in other words, the seeds of the oldest varieties of good fruit mostly yield inferiour sorts, seeds taken from recent varie- ties of bad fruit, and reproduced uni^terrwptedly for several gene- rations^ will certainly produce good fruit. With these premises. Dr. Van Mons begins by gathering his seeds from a young seedling tree, without paying much regard to its quality, except that it must be in a state of variation; that is to say, a garden variety, and not a wild sort. These he sows in a seedbed or nureery, where he leaves the seedlingt until they attain suflBcient size to enable him to judge of theii character. He then selects those which appear the most pio- mising, plants them a few feet distant in the nursery, and awaits their fruit. Not discouraged at finding most of them of mediocre quality, though diff"ering from the parent, he gathers the first seeds of the most promising and sows them again. The next generation comes more rapidly into bearing than the first, and shows a greater number of promising traits. Gathering imme- diately, and sowing the seeds of this generation, he produces a third, then a fourth, and even a fiith generation, uninterruptedly, from the original sort. P^ach generation he finds to come more quickly into bearing than the previous ones, (the 5th sowing of THE VAN MOXS METHOD. 7 pears fruiting at three years,) and to produce a greater numbei of valuable varieties ; until in the fifth generation the seedlings are nearly all of great excellence. Dr. Van Mons found the pear to require the longest time to attain perfection, and he carried his process with this fi-uit through five generations, j^pples he found needed but four races, and peaches, cherries, plums, and other stone fruits, were brought to perfection in three successive reproductions from the seed. It will be remembered that it is a leading feature in this theory that, in order to improve the fruit, we must subdue or enfeeble the original coarse luxuriance of the tree. Keeping this in mind, Dr. Van Mons always gathers his fruit before fully ripe, and allows them to rot before planting the seeds, in order to refine or render less wild and harsh the next generation. In transplanting the young seedlings into quarters to bear, he cuts off the tap root, and he annually shortens the leading and side branches, besides planting them only a few feet apart. All this lessens the vigour of the trees, and produces an impression upon the nature of the seeds which will be produced by their first fruit ; and, in order to continue in full force the progressive Tariation, he allows his seedlings to bear on their own roots.* Such is Dr. Van Mons' theory and method for obtaining new varieties of fruit. It has never obtained much favour in Eng- land, and from the length of time necessary to bring about its results, it is scarcely likely to come into very general use here. At the same time it is not to be denied that in his hands it has proved a very successful mode of obtaining new varieties. It is also undoubtedly true that it is a mode closely founded on natural laws, and that the great bulk of our fine varieties have originated, nominally by chance, but really, by successive reproductions from the seed in our gardens. It is not a little remarkable that the constant springing up of fine new sorts of fruit in the United States, which is every day growing more frequent, is given with much apparent force as a proof of the accuracy of the Van Mons theory. The first colo- nists here, who brought with them many seeds gathered from the best old varieties of fruits, were surprised to find their seed- lings producing only very inferior fruits. These seedlings had returned by their inherent tendency almost to a wild state. By rearing from them, however, seedlings of many repeated gene- rations, we have arrived at a great number of the finest apples, * " I have found this art to consist in regenerating in a direct hne of descent, and as rapidly as possible, an improving variety, taking care that there be no interval between the generations. To sow, to re-sow, to sow again, to sow perpetually, in short to do nothing but sow, is the practice to be pursued, and which cannot be departed from ; and in short this is the whole secret of the art I have employed." — Van Mons' Arhres Fruiiiers, 1. p. 223. 2 8 PRODUCTION OF NEW VARIETIES. pears, peaches, and plums. According to Dr. Van Mons, had this process been continued iininternqytcdli/j from one generation to the next, a much shorter time would have been necessary for the production of first rate varieties. To show how the practice of chance sowing works in the other hemisphere, it is stated by one of the most celebrated of the old writers on fruits, Duhamel of France, that he had been in the habit of planting seeds of the finest table pears for fifty years without ever having produced a good variety. These seeds were from trees of old varieties of fruit. The American gardener will easily perceive, from what we have stated, a great advantage placed in his hands at the present time for the amelioration of fruits by this system. He will see that, as most of our American varieties of fruit are the re- sult of repeated sowings, more or less constantly repeated, he has before him almost every day a part of the ameliorating pro- cess in progress ; to which Dr. Van Mons, beginning de novo, was obliged to devote his whole life. Nearly all that it is ne- cessary for him to do in attempting to raise a new variety of ex- cellence by this simple mode, is to gather his seeds (before they are fully ripe,) from a seedling sort of promising quality, though not yet arrived at perfection. The seedling must be quite young — must be on its own root (not grafted ;) and it must be a healthy tree, in order to secure a healthy generation of seed- lings. Our own experience leads us to believe that he will scarcely have to go beyond one or two generations to obtain fine fruit. These remarks apply to most of our table fruits common- ly cultivated. On the other hand, our native grapes, the Isabella, Catawba, &c., which are scarcely removed from the wild state, must by this ameliorating process be carried through several successive generations before we arrive at varieties equalling the finest foreign grapes ; a result, which, judging from what we see in progress, we have every reason speedily to hope for. In order to be most successful in raising new varieties by suc- cessive reproduction, let us bear in mind that we must avoid — 1st, the seeds of old fruit trees ; 2d, those of grafted fruit trees ; and 3d, that we have the best grounds for good results when we gather our seeds from a young seedling tree, which is itself ra- ther a perfecting than a perfect fruit. It is not to be denied that, in the face of Dr. Van Mons' theory, in this country, new varieties of rare excellence are sometimes obtained at once by planting the seeds of old grafted varieties; thus the Lawrence's Favourite, and the Columbia plums, were raised from seeds of the Green Gage, one of the oldest European varieties. Such arc the means of originating new fruits by the Belgian mode. Let us now examine another more direct, more interest- ing, and more scientific process — cros.s-breediug; a mode almost CROSS-BREEDING. 9 universally pursued now by skilful cultivators, in producing new and finer varieties of plants ; and which Mr. Knight, the most distinguished horticulturist of the age, so successfully prac- tised on fruit trees. Cross-breeding. In the blossoms of fruit-trees, and of most other plants, the seed is the offspring of the stamens and pistil, which may be considered the male and female parents, growing in the same flower. Cross-breeding is, then, nothing more than removing out of the blossom of a fruit tree the stamens, or male parents, and bringing those of another, and different variety of fruit, and dusting the pistil or female parent with them, — a process suffi- ciently simple, but which has the most marked effect on the seeds produced. It is only within about fifty years that cross-breeding has been practised ; but Lord Bacon, whose great mind seems to have had glimpses into every dark corner of human know- ledge, finely foreshadowed it. " The compounding or mixture of plants is not found out, which, if it were, is more at command than that of living creatures ; wherefore, it were one of the most notable discoveries touching plants to find it out, for so you may have great varieties of fruits and flowers yet unknown." In figure 1, is shown the blossom of the Cherry. The central portion, or, connected directly with the young fruit, is the pistil. The numerous surrounding threads, 5, are the stamens. The summit of the stamen is called the anther, and secretes the powdery substance called pollen. The pistil has at its base the *"'?• 1- embryo fruit, and at its summit, the stigma. The use of the stamens is to fertilize the young seed contained at the base of the pistil ; and if we fertilize the pistil of one variety of fruit by the pollen of another, we shall obtain a new variety partaking intermediately of the qualities of both parents. Thus, among fruits owing their origin directly to cross-breeding, Coe's Golden Drop Plum, was raised from the Green Gage, impreg- nated by the Magnum Bonum, or Egg plum ; and the Elton cherry, from the Bigarrieu, impregnated by the White Heart.* Mr. Knight was of opinion that the habits of the new variety would always be found to partake most strongly of the constitu- tion and habits of the female parent. Subsequent experience does not fully confirm this, and it would appear that the parent * The seedlings sometimes most resemble one parent sometimes the other ; but more frequently share the qualities of both. Mr. Coxe describes an Apple, a cross between a Newtown Pippin and a Russet, the fruit of which resembled externally at one end the Russet and at the other the Pippm, and the flavour at either end corresponded exactly with the character of the exteriour 1* 10 PRODUCTION OF NEW VARIETIES. whose cliaracter is most permanent, impresses its form most for- cibly on the otfspring. The process of obtaining cross-bred seeds of fruit trees is very easily performed. It is only necessary when the tree blooms which we intend to be the mother of the improved race, to select a blossom or blossoms growing upon it not yet fully expanded. With a pair of scissors, we cut out and remove all the anthers. The next day, or as soon as the blossom is quite expanded, we collect with a camel's hair brush, the pollen from a fully blown flower of the variety we intend for the male parent, applying the pollen and leaving it upon the stigma or point of the pistil. If your trees are much exposed to those busy little meddlers, the bees, it is well to cover the blossoms with a loose bag of thin gauze, or they will perhaps get beforehand with you in your experiments in cross-breeding. Watch the blossoms closely as they open, and bear in mind that the two essential points in the operation are ; 1st, to extract the anthers carefully, before they have matured sufficiently to fertilize the pistil ; and 2d, to apply the pollen w^hen it is in perfection, (dry and powdery,) and while the stigma is moist. A very little practice will enable the amateur to judge of these points. There are certain limits to the power of crossing plants. What is strictly called a cross-hred plant or fruit is a sub-variety raised between two varieties of the same species. There are, however, certain species, nearly allied, which are capable of fer- tilizing each other. The offspring in this case is called a hybrid, or mule, and does not always produce perfect seeds. " This power of hybridising," says Dr. Lindley, " appears to be much more common in plants than in animals. It is, however, in general only between nearly allied species that this intercourse can take place ; those which are w^idely different in structure and constitution not being capable of any artificial union. Thus the different species of Strawberry, of the gourd or melon family, intermix with the greatest facilit}^, there being a great accord- ance between them in general structure, and constitution. But no one has ever succeeded in compelling the pear to fertilize the apple, nor the gooseberry the currant. And as species that are very dissimilar appear to have some natural impediment which prevents their reciprocal fertilization, so does this obstacle, of whatever nature it may be, present an insuperable bar to the in- tercourse of the different genera. All the stories that are cur- rent as to the intermixture of oranges and pomegranates, of roses and black currants, and the like, may therefore be set down to pure invention." In practice this power of improving varieties by crossing is A ery largely resorted to by gardeners at the present day. Not (.nly in fruit trees, but in ornamental trees, shrubs, and plants, and especially in florists' flowers, it has been carried to a great CROSS-BREEDING. 11 extent. The ^eat number of new and beautiful Roses, Azaleas, Camellias, Fachsias, Dahlias, and other flowering plants so splendid in colour, and perfect in form, owe their origin to care- ful cross-breeding. In the amelioration of fruits it is by far the most certain, and satisfactory process yet discovered. Its results are more speed- ily obtained, and correspond much more closely to our aim, than those procured by successive reproduction. In order to obtain a new variety of a certain character, it is only necessary to select two parents of well known habits, and which are both varieties of the same, or nearly allied species, and cross them for a new and intermediate variety. Thus, if we have a very early, but insipid and worthless sort of pear, and desire to raise from it a variety both early and of fine flavour, we should fertilize some of its pistils, with the pollen of the best flavoured variety of a little later maturity. Among the seed- lings produced, we should look for early pears of good quality and at least for one or two varieties nearly, or quite as early as the female parent, and as delicious as the male. If we have a very small, but highly flavoured pear, and wish for a larger pear with a somewhat similar flavour, we must fertilize the first with the pollen of a large and handsome sort. If we desire to im- part the quality of lateness to a very choice plum, we must look out for a late variety, whether of good or bad quality, as the mother, and cross it with our best flavoured sort. If we desire to impart hardiness to a tender fruit, we must undertake a cross between it and a much hardier sort ; if we seek greater beauty of colour, or vigour of growth, we must insure these qualities by selecting one parent having such quality strongly marked. As the seeds produced by cross fertilization are not found to produce precisely the same varieties, though they will nearly all partake of the mixed character of the parents, it follows that we shall be most successful in obtaining precisely all we hope for in the new race, in proportion to the number of our cross-bred seedlings ; some of which may be inferiour, as well as some superiour to the parents. It is always well, therefore, to cross several flowers at once on the same plant, when a single blossom does not produce a number of seeds. We should observe here, that those who devote their time to raising new varieties, must bear in mind that it is not always by the first fruits of a seedling that it should be judged. Some of the finest varieties require a considerable age before their best qualities develop themselves, as it is only when the tree has arrived at some degree of maturity that its secretions, either for flower, or fruit, are perfectly elaborated. The first fruit of the Black Eagle cherry, a fine cross-bred raised by Mr. Knight, was pronounced worthless when first exhibited to the London Horticultural Society ; its quality now proves that the tree was not then of sufficient age to produce its fruit in perfection. 12 PROPAGATION. CHAPTER II. PROPAGATION OF VARIETIES. GRAFTING. BUDDING. CUTTINGS. LAYERS AND SUCKERS. After having obtained a new and choice kind of fruit, which in our hands is perhaps only a single tree, and which, as we have already shown, seldom produces the same from seed, the next inquiry is how to continue this variety in existence, and how to increase and extend it, so that other gardens and coun- tries may possess it as well as ourselves. This leads us to the subject of the propagation of fruit trees, or the continuation of varieties by grafting and budding. Grafting and budding are the means in most common use for propagating fruit trees. Tliey are, in fact, nothing more than inserting upon one tree, the shoot or bud of another, in such a manner that the two may unite and form a new compound. No person having any interest in a garden should be unable to per- form these operations, as they are capable of effecting transfor- mations and improvements in all trees and shrubs, no less valu- able, than they are beautiful and interesting. Grafting is a very ancient invention, having been well known and practised by the Greeks and Romans. The latter, indeed, describe a great variety of modes, quite as ingenious as any of the fanciful variations now used by gardeners. The French, who are most expert in grafting, practise occasionally more than fifty modes, and within a few years have succeeded per- fectly in grafting annual plants, such as the tomato, the dahlia, and the like. The uses of grafting^ and budding^ as applied to fruit trees, may be briefly stated as follows : 1. The rapid increase or propagation of valuable sorts of fruit not easily raised by seeds, or cuttings, as is the case with nearly all varieties. 2. To renew or alter the heads of trees, partially or fully grown, producing in two or three years, by heading-in and grafting, a new head, bearing the finest fruit, on a formerly worthless tree. 3. To render certain foreign and delicate sorts of fruit more hardy by grafting them on robust stocks of the same species na- tive to the country, as the foreign grape on the native. And to produce fine fruit in climates or situations not naturally favour- able by grafting on another species more hardy ; as in a cool GRAFTING. 13 climate and damp strong soil, by working the Peach on the Plum. 4. To render divarf certain kinds of fruit, by grafting them on suitable stocks of slower growth, as in the case of the Pear on the Quince, the Apple on the paradise stock, &c. 5. By grafting several kinds on the same tree, to be able to have a succession of fruit, from early to late, in a small garden. .6. To hasten the bearing of seedling varieties of fruit, or of such as are a long time in producing fruit, by grafting them on the branches of full grown, or mature bearing trees. Thus a seedling pear, which would not produce fruit on its own root in a dozen years, w^ill generally begin to bear the third or fourth year, if grafted on the extremity of the bearing branches of a mature tree. The proper time for grafting fruit trees is in the spring, as soon as the sap is in motion, which commences earliest with the Cherry and Plum, and ends with the Pear and Apple. The pre- cise time of course varies with the season and the climate, but is generally comprised from February to the middle of April. The grape vine, how^ever, Avhich suffers by bleeding, is not usu- ally grafted until it is in leaf. The most favourable w^eather for grafting is a mild atmosphere with occasional showers. The scions are generally selected previously ; as it is found in nearly all kinds of grafting by scions, that success is more complete when the stock upon which they are placed is a little more advanced — the sap in a more active state than in the scion. To secure this, we usually cut the scions very early in the spring, during winter, or even in the autumn, burying their lower ends in the ground in a shaded place, or keeping them in fine soil in the cellar till w^anted for use. ' In cutting scions, w^e choose straight thrifty shoots of the last year's growth, which may remain entire until w^e commence grafting, w^hen they may be cut into scions of three or four buds each. In se- lecting scions from old trees it is always advisable to choose the most vigorous of the last year's shoots growing near the centre or top of the tree. Scions from sickly and unhealthy branches should be rejected, as they are apt to carry with them this feeble and sickly state. Scions taken from the lower bearing branches will produce fruit soonest, but they will not afford trees of so handsome a shape, or so vigorous a growth, as those taken from the thrifty upright shoots near the centre or top of the tree. Nurserymen generally take their scions from young grafted trees in the nursery-rows, these being usually in better condition than those taken from old trees not alw^ays in a healthy state. The stock for grafting upon^ is generally a tree w^hich has been standing, at least for a year previously, on the spot where it is grafted, as success is much less certain on newly moved trees. 14 PROPAGATION. In the case, however, of very small trees or stocks, which are grafted below the surface of the ground, as is frequently the practice with the Apple in American nurseries, the stocks are grafted in the house in winter, or early spring, put away care- fully in a damp cellar, and planted out in the spring ; but this method is only successful when the root is small, and when the top of the stock is taken off, and the whole root is devoted to supplying the graft with nourishment. The theory of grafting is based on the power of union between the young tissues, or organizable matter of growing w^ood. When the parts are placed nicely in contact, the ascending sap of the stock passes into and sustains life in the scion ; the buds of the latter, excited by this supply of sap and the warmth of the sea- son, begin to elaborate and send down w^oody matter, which, passing through the newly granulated substance of the parts in contact, unites the graft firmly with the stock. " If," says De Candolle, " the descending sap has only an incomplete analogy with the wants of the stock, the latter does not thrive, though the organic union may have taken place ; and if the analogy be- tween the albumen of stock and scion is wanting, the organic union does not operate , the scion cannot absorb the sap of the stock and the graft fails." Grafting therefore is confined within certain limits. A scion from one tree will not, from the want of affinity, succeed on every other tree, but only upon those to which it is allied. We are, in short, only successful in budding or grafting where there is a close relationship and similarity of structure between the stock and the scion. This is the case with varieties of the same species, which take most freely, as the difi"erent sorts of Apple ; next with the diff"erent sj^ecies of a genus as the Apple and the Pear, which grow, but in which the union is less complete and permanent ; and lastly with the genera of the same natural family, as the Cherry on the Plum — which die after a season or two. The ancients boasted of Vines and Apples grafted on Poplars and Elms ; but repeated experiments, by the most skilful cultivators of modern times, have clearly proved that although w^e may, once in a thousand trials, succeed in efi'ecting these ill assorted unions, yet the graft invariably dies after a few months' growth.* The range in grafting or budding, for fruit trees in ordinary * The classical horticulturist will not fail to recall to mind Pliny's account of the tree in the garden of Lucullus, grafted in such a manner as to bear Olives, Almonds, Apples, Pears, Plums, Figs, and Grapes. There is little doubt, however, that this was some ingenious deception — as to this day the Italian gardeners pretend to sell Jasmines, Honeysuckles, &c., growing to- gether and grafted on Oranges and Pomegranates. This is ingeniously managed, for a short-lived effect, by introducing the stems of these smaller plants through a hole bored up the centre of the stock of the trees — their roots being in the same soil, and their stems, which after a little growth fill up these holes, appearing aa if really grafted. GRAFTING. 15 culture, is as the following; Apples, on apple or crab seedlings for orchards (standards,) or on Paradise apple stocks, for dwarfs ; Pears, on pear seedlings for common culture, or Quince stocks for dwarfs, and sometimes on the thorn for clayey soils ; Peaches, on their own seedlings for standards or for orchards; on Almonds, for hot and dry climates ; on Plums in cold or moist soils, or to secure them against the worm ; Apricots, on Plum stocks, to render them hardy and productive, or on their own seedlings to render them long-lived. Nectarines are usually worked on the Peach or Plum; and Cherries on mazzard seedlings; or some- times on the perfumed Cherry for dwarfs. The manual operation of grafting is performed in a very easy and complete manner when the size of the stock, or branch to be grafted, corresponds pre- cisely with that of the scion. In this case, which is called splice grafting, it is only necessary with a smooth sloping cut, upwards on the stock a, and downwards on the scion 6, Fig. 2, to make the two fit precisely, so that the inner bark of one corresponds exactly with that of the other, to bind them firmly together with a strand of matting, and to cover the wound entirely with grafting clay or wax, and the whole is finished. In this, which is one of the neatest modes, the whole forms a complete union nearly at once ; leaving scarcely any wounded part to heal over. But, as it is only rarely that the stock is of so small a size as to fit thus perfectly to the scion, the operation must be varied somewhat, and requires more skill. The method in most com- mon use to cover all difiiculties, is called tongue Splice grafting, grafting. We may remark here that grafting the shoots of Peaches, Nectarines and Apricots, owing to their large pith, is more difficult than that of other fruit trees. A variation of splice-grafting. Fig. 3, has been invented to obviate this. This consists in selecting the scion a, so as to leave at its lower end about a fourth of an inch of two years old wood which is much firmer. The bottom of the slope on the stock is cut w^ith a dove-tail notch 6, into which the scion is fitted. Tongue grafting, (or whip-grafting,) Fig. 4, resembles very nearly splice-grafting, except, instead of the simple splice, a tongue is made to hold the two together more firmly. In order to understand this method let us explain it a lit- grafting the peach tie in detail. Fig. 2. \(L Fig. 3. Splice 16 PROPAGATION. Tongue-grafting, ^progressive stages. Having cliosen your stock of tlie proper size, cut it off at the point where, a, it appears best to fix the graft. If the stock is quite small, it may be within three or four inches of the ground. Then, with a very sharp knife, make a smooth cut upwards, 6, about two inches in length. Next make a slit from the top of this cut about one fourth of the way downwards, c, taking out a thin tongue of wood. Cut the scion four or five inches long, or so as to have three buds; then shape the lower end with a single smooth sloping cut, e, about the same length as that on the stock, and make the tongue upward, /, to fit in the downward slit of the stock. Now apply the scion accurately to the stock, making the inner hark of the scion ft exactly the inner hark of the stock, at least on one side, g. \Vithout changing their position, tie them together carefully with a piece of bass-matting or tape, h. And finally cover the wound with well prepared grafting-clay or wax, i. This ball of clay should more than cover the union, by an inch above and below, and should be about an inch thick. If grafting-wax is used, the covering need not be above half an inch thick. In a month's time, if the graft has taken, it will be expanding its leaves and sending out shoots. It will then be necessary to rub or cut off all shoots between the ball and the ground, if it is a small stock, or all those which would rob it of a principal share of nourishment, if upon a large tree. If the scion or stock is very weak, it is usual to leave one or two other buds for a time, to assist in drawing up the sap. About the middle of July, after a rainy day, you may remove the ball of clay, and, if the graft is GRAFTING. 17 securely united, also the bandage ; and the angle left at the top of the stock, a, should now be cut off smoothly, in order to allow the bark of the stock and the scion to heal neatly over the whole wound. Though it is little attended to in common practice, the ama- teur will be glad to know that the success of a graft is always greatly insured by choosing the parts so that a bud is left near the top of the stock, A:, and another near the bottom of the scion, I. These buds attract the rising sap to the portions where they are placed, form woody matter, and greatly facilitate the union of the parts near them; the upper part of the stock, and the lower part of the scion, being the portions soonest liable to perish from a want of nourishment.* Cleft grafting is a very easy though rather clumsy mode, and is in more common use than any other in the United States. It is chiefly practised on large stocks, or trees the branches of which have been headed back, and are too large for tongue-grafting. The head of the stock is first cut over horizontally w^ith the saw, and smoothed with a knife. A cleft about two inches deep is then made in the stock with a hammer and splitting-knife. The scion is now prepared, by sloping its lower end in the form of a wedge about an inch and a half long, leaving it a little thicker on the outer edge. Opening the cleft with the splitting-knife, or a small chisel for that purpose, push the scion carefully down to its place, fitting its inner bark on one side to that of one side of the stock. When the stock is large, it is usual to insert two scions. Fig. 4. On withdraw- ing the chisel, the cleft closes firmly on the scions, when the graft is tied and clayed in the usual manner. Apple stocks in many American nurseries, are grafted in great quantities in this mode — the stocks being previously taken out of the ground, headed down very near the root, cleft grafted with a single scion, sloping off" with an oblique cut the side of the stock opposite that where the graft is placed, and then planted at once in the rows so as to allow only a couple of buds of the scion to appear above ground. It is not usual with many, either to tie, or clay the grafts in this case, as the wound is placed below the surface ; but when this plan is adopted, the grafts must be set * In grafting large quantities of young trees when stocks are scarce, it is not an unusual practice in some nurseries to tongue or whip-graft upon small pieces of roots of the proper sort of tree, planting the same in the earth as soon as grafted. Indeed, Dr. Van Mons considers this the most complete of all modes, with regard to the perfect condition of the grafted sort; 1st, because the smallestquantity of the stock is used; and 2d, because the lower part of the scion being thus placed in tlie ground, afteratime it throws out tibresfrom that portion, and so at last is actually growing on its own roots. 18 PROPAGATION. and the trees planted at once, drawing tlie well pulverized soil with great care around the graft. Another w^ay of grafting apple stocks, common in some western nurseries, consists in tongue-grafting on seedling stocks of very small size, cut back almost to the root. This is performed in winter, by the fire- side— the grafts carefully tied, and the roots placed in the cel- lar, in sand, till spring, when they are planted, the top of the graft just above ground. Grafting the Vine is attended with great success in the cleft manner if treated as follows. Cut your scions during the winter or early spring, keeping them partially buried in a cool damp cellar till wanted. As soon as the leaves of the old vine or stock are fully expanded, and all danger of bleeding is past — say about the 10th of June, cut it off smoothly below the surface of the ground, and split the stock and insert one or two scions in the usual manner, binding the cleft well together if it does not close firmly. Draw the soil carefully over the whole, leaving two or three buds of the scion above the surface. If the root of the stock is a strong native grape, the graft will frequently grow ten or fifteen feet during the first season, and yield a fair crop the second year. The Vine may also be grafted with good success at the usual season if grafted below the ground, but above ground, it should not be attempted, on account of bleeding, until the leaves are nearly expanded. Saddle grafting, Fig. 5, consists in cutting the top of the stock in the form of a wedge, splitting the scion and thinning away each half to a tongue shape, placing it astride the stock, and fitting the two, at least on one side, as in tongue-grafting. This mode off'ers the largest surface for the junc- tion of the scion and stock, and the union is very perfect. Mr. Knight, who practised it chiefly upon Cherry trees, states that he has rarely ever seen a graft fail, even when the wood has been so succulent and immature as to preclude every hope of success by any other mode. A variety of this mode, for stocks larger than the scions, is practised with much success in Eng- land after the usual season is past, and when the bark of the stock separates readily. "The scion, which must be smaller than the stock, is split up between two or three inches from its lower end, so as to have one side stronger than the other. ITiis strong side is then properly prepared and introduced between the bark and the wtjocI ; while the thinner division is fittcJ to the opposite side of the stock." The graft, thus placed, receives a large supply of the sustaining fluid from the stock, and the union Fig. 5. Saddle grafting. BUDDING. 19 is rapid ; wliile the wound on the stock is speedily covered by a new layer of bark from that part of the scion which stands astride it. Grafting clay is prepared by mixing one third horse- dung free from straw, and two thirds clay, or clayey loam, with a little hair, like that used in plaster, to pre- vent its cracking. Beat and temper it for two or three days, until it is thoroughly incorporated. When used, it should be of such a con- sistency as to be easily put on and shaped with the hands. Grafting wax of excel- lent quality we have made '■J by melting together three |' parts of bees-w^ax, three I parts of rosin and two parts • tallow. While yet warm it may be worked with the aid of a little w^ater, like shoemaker's wax, by the hand. The common graft- ing w^ax of the French gardeners is of two kinds. Fig. 6. Saddle grafting large stocks. The first, is melted and laid on with a brush in a fluid state, and is made of half a pound of pitch, half a pound of bees-wax, and a pound of cow-dung boiled to- gether. The second, which is spread while w^arm on strips of coarse cotton, or strong paper, and wrapped directly about the graft, answering at once to tie and to protect it, is composed of equal parts of bees-wax, turpentine and resin. The gi'afting wax most commonly used here is made of tallow, bees-wax, and resin, in equal parts, or, as many prefer, with a little more tallow to render it pliable. Grafting wax is a much neater and more perfect protection than grafting clay, but the trifling cost of the latter, where a great deal of work is to be done, accounts for its greater use by nurserymen, and gardeners generally. Budding. Budding {inoculating^ of the old authors) differs from common grafting not the least in its nature or effects. Every bud is a distinct individual, capable of becoming a tree under favourable 20 PROPAGATIOX. circumstances. In grafting, we use a brancli, composed of seve- ral buds with a considerable quantity of bark and wood ; while in budding, we employ but a single bud, with a very small quan- tity of the adjoining bark and wood. The advantages of budding fruit trees, compared with grafting, are so considerable, that in this country it is ten times as much practised. These are, first, the great rapidity with which it is performed ; a skilful budder, with a clever boy following him to tie the buds, being able to work from a thousand to twelve hun- dred young nursery stocks in a day. 2d. The more convenient season at which it is performed, in all countries where a short spring crowds garden labours within a small space. 3d. Being able to perform the operation without injuring the stock in case of failure, which is always more or less the case in stocks headed down for grafting. 4th. The opportunity which it afi"ords, when performed in good season, of repeating the trial on the same stock. To these we may add that budding is universally pre- ferred here for all stone fruits, such as Peaches, Apricots, and the like, as these require extra skill in grafting, but are budded with great ease. The i^ro'per season for budding fruit trees in this country is from the first of July to the middle of September ; the different trees coming into season as follows ; Plums, Cherries, Apri- cots on Plums, Apricots, Pears, Apples, Quinces, Nectarines, and Peaches. Trees of considerable size will require budding earlier than young seedling stocks. But the opera- tion is always, and only, performed when the hark of the stock 2yarts or separates fi'eely from the wood, and when the buds of the current year's growth are some- what plump, and the young wood is growing firm. Young stocks in the nursery, if thrifty, are usually planted out in the rows in the spring, and budded the same summer or autumn. Before commencing you should provide yourself with a budding knife. Fig, 7, (about four and a half inches long,) having a rounded blade at one end, and an ivory handle terminating in a thin rounded edge called the haft^ a, at the other. In choosing your buds, select thrifty shoots that have nearly done growing, and prepare what is called a stick of buds, Fig. 8, by cutting oft' a few of the imperfect buds at the lower, and such as may be yet too soft at the upper ends, leaving only smooth well developed single buds ; double buds being fruit-buds. Cut off the leaves, allowing about half an inch of the foot-stalks to remain for conveniently inserting the buds. Some strands of bass-matting about twelve or J^^jJ^^JjJ,^' fourteen inches long, previously soaked in water to BUDDING. 21 render ttem soft and pliable, (or in the absence of these soipe soft woollen yarn,) must also be at hand for tying the buds. Shield or T budding is the most approved mode in all countries. A new variety of this method now generally practised in this country we shall describe first as being the simplest and best mode for fruit trees. American shield budding. Having your stick of buds ready, choose a smooth portion of the stock. When the latter is small, let it be near the ground, and, .if equally convenient, select also the north side of the stock, as less exposed to the sun. Make an upright incision in the bark from an inch to an inch and a half long, and at the top of this make a cross cut, so that the whole shall form a T. From the stick of buds, your knife being very sharp, cut a thin, smooth slice of wood and bark containing a bud. Fig. 9, a. With the ivory haft of your bud- ding knife, now raise the bark on each side of the incision just wide enough to admit easily the pre- pared bud. Taking hold of the footstalk of the leaf, insert the bud under the bark, pushing it gently pj^ g j, down to the bottom of the incision. If the upper stick of huds. portion of the bud projects above the horizontal ^"^ part of the T, cut it smoothly off now, so that it 'm may completely fit, b. A bandage of the soft ^^ matting is now tied pretty firmly over the whole wound. Fig. 10, commencing at the bottom, and leaving the bud, and the footstalk of the leaf only exposed to the light and air. Common shield budding, Fig. 11, practised in all gardens in Europe, differs from the foregoing only in one respect — the removal of the slice of w^ood contained in the bud. This is taken out with the point of the knife, holding the bud or shield by the leaf stalk, with one hand, inserting the knife under the wood at the lower extremity, and then raising and drawing out the wood by bending it upwards and downwards, with a slight jerk, until it is loosened from the bark ; always taking care that a small portion of the wood re- mains behind to fill up the hollow at the base or heart of the bud. The bud thus prepared is in- serted precisely as before described. The American variety of shield budding is found greatly preferable to the European mode, at least for this climate. Many sorts of fiuit trees, especially Plums and Cherries, nearly mature Fig. la Fig. 9. American shield budding. 22 PROPAGATION. Fig. 11. their growth, and require to be budded in the hottest part of our summer. In the old method, the bud having only a shield of bark with but a particle of wood in the heart of the bud, is much more liable to be destroyed by heat, or dryness, than when the slice of wood is left behind in the American way. Taking out this w^ood is always an operation requiring some dex- terity and practice, as few buds grow when their eye, or heart wood is damaged. The American method, therefore, requires less skill, can be done earlier in the season with younger wood, is performed in much less time, and is uniformly more successful. It has been very fairly tested upon hun- dreds of thousand fruit trees, in our gar- dens, for the last twenty years, and although practised English budders coming here, at first are greatly prejudiced against it, as being in direct opposition to one of the most essential features in the old mode, yet a fair trial has never failed to convince them of the superiority of the new. After treatment. In two weeks after the operation you will be able to see whether the bud has taken, by its plumpness and freshness. If it has failed, you may, if the bark still parts readily, make another trial ; a clever budder will not lose more than 6 or 8 per cent. If it has succeeded, after a fortnight more has elapsed, the bandage must be loosened, or if the stock has swelled much, it should be removed altogether. When bud- ding has been performed very late, w^e have occasionally found it an advantage to leave the bandage on during the winter. As soon as the buds commence swelling in the ensuing spring, head down the stock, with a sloping back cut, within two or three inches of the bud. The bud will then start vigorously, and all "rob- bers," as the shoots of the stock near to and below the bud are termed, must be taken off from time to time. To secure the upright growth of the bud, and to prevent its being broken by the winds, it is tied when a few inches long to that portion of the stock left for the purpose. Fig. 12, a. About mid- summer, if the shoot is strong, this support may be removed, and the superfluous portion of the stock smoothly cut away in the dotted line, 6, when it will be rapidly covered with young bark. We have found a great advantage, when budding trees which do not take readily, in adopting Mr. Knight's excellent mode of tying with two distinct freafmentoftM bandages ; one covering that part below the bud, growing bud. INFLUENCE OF THE STOCK. 23 and the other the portion above it. In this case the lower band- age is removed as soon as the bud has taken, and the upper left for two or three weeks longer. This, by arresting the upward sap, completes the union of the upper portion of bud, ('which in plums frequently dies, while the lower part is united,) and se- cures success. Reversed shield budding^ which is nothing more than making the cross cut at the bottom, instead of the top of the upright in- cision in the bark, and inserting the bud from below, is a good deal practised in the south of Europe, but we have not found that it possesses any superiour merit for fruit trees. An ingenious application of budding, worthy the attention of amateur cultivators, consists in using a blossom-bud instead of a wood-bud; when, if the operation is carefully done, blossoms and fruit will be produced at once. This is most successful with the Pear, though we have often succeeded also with the Peach. Blossom-buds are readily distinguished, as soon as well formed, by their roundness, and in some trees by their growing in pairs; while w^ood-buds grow singly, and are more or less pointed. We have seen a curious fruit growler borrow in this way, in September, from a neighbor ten miles distant, a single blossom-bud of a rare new pear, and produce from it a fair and beautiful fruit the next summer. The bud, in such cases, should be inserted on a favourable limb of a bearing tree. Annular budding, Fig. 13, we have found a valuable mode for trees with hard wood, and thick bark, or those which, like the walnut, have buds so large as to render it difficult to bud them in the common way. A ring of bark, when the sap is flowing freely, is taken from the stock, a, and a ring of corresponding size containing a bud, b, from the scion. If the latter should be too large, a piece must be taken from it to make Fie'. 13. it fit; or should all the scions be too small, Annular budding, the ring upon the stock may extend only three fourths the way round, to suit the ring of the bud. An a2y2)lication of this mode of great value occasionally occurs in this country. In snowy winters, fruit trees in orchards are sometimes girdled at the ground by field mice, and a growth of twenty years is thus destroyed in a single day, should the girdle extend quite round the tree. To save such a tree, it is only necessary, as soon as the sap rises vigorously in the spring, to apply a new ring of bark in the annular mode taken from a branch of proper size ; tying it firmly, covering it with grafting clay to exclude the air, and finally drawing up the earth so as to cover the wound completely. When the tree is too large to apply an entire ring, separate pieces, carefully fitted, will an- swer ; and it is well to reduce the top somewhat by pruning 24 PROPAGATION. that it may not make too large a demand on the root for a sup- ply of food. Budding may be done in tlie spring as well as at the latter end of summer, and is frequently so performed upon roses, and other ornamental shrubs, by French gardeners, but is only in occasional use upon fruit trees. Influence of the stock and graft. The well known fact that we may have a hundred different varieties of pear on the same tree, each of which produces its fruit of the proper form, colour, and quality ; and that we may have, at least for a time, several distinct, though nearly related species upon one stock, as the Peach, Apricot, Nectarine, and Plum, prove very conclusively the power of every grafted or budded branch, however small, in preserving its identity. To explain this, it is only necessary to recall to mind that the as- cending sap, which is furnished by the root or stock, is nearly a simple fluid ; that the leaves digest and modify this sap, forming a proper juice, which re-descends in the inner bark, and that thus every bud and leaf upon a branch maintains its individu- ality by preparing its own proper nourishment, or organizing matter, out of that general aliment, the sap. Indeed, according to De Candolle,* each separate cellule of the inner bark has this power of preparing its food according to its nature ; in proof of which, a striking experiment has been tried by grafting rings of bark, of different allied species, one above another on the same tree without allowing any buds to grow upon them. On cutting down and examining this tree, it was found that under each ring of bark was deposited the proper wood of its species, thus clearly proving the power of the bark in preserving its identity, even without leaves. On the other hand, though the stock increases in size by the woody matter received in the descending sap from the graft, yet as this descends through the inner bark of the stock, it is elabo- rated by, and receives its character from the latter ; so that, after a tree has been grafted fifty years, a shoot which springs out from its trunk below the place of union, will always be found to bear the original wild fruit, and not to have been in the least affected by the graft. But, whilst grafting never effects any alteration in the identity of the variety or species of fruit, still it is not to be de- nied that the stock does exert certain influences over the habits of the graft. The most important of these are dwarfing, indu- cing fruitfulness, and adapting the graft to the soil or climate. Thus every one knows that the slower habit of growth in the * Physiologic Vegetable, INFLUENCE OE THE STOCK. 25 Quince stock, is sliared by the Pear grafted upon it, whicli be- comes a dwarf; as does also the Apple when worked on the Paradise stock, and, in some degree, the Peach on the Plum. The want of entire similarity of structure between the stock and graft, confines the growth of the latter, and changes it, in the case of the Pear, from a lofty tree to a shrub of eight or ten feet in height. The effect of this difference of structure is very ap- parent, when the Peach is grafted on the Plum, in the greater size of the trunk above, as compared with that below the graft ; a fact which seems to arise from the obstruction which the descend- ing sap of the graft finds in its course through the bark of the stock. To account for the earlier and greater fruitfulness caused by grafting on a stock of slower growth, Mr. Knight, in one of his able papers, offers the following excellent remarks. " The disposition in young trees to produce and nourish blos- som buds and fruit, is increased by this apparent obstruction of the descending sap ; and the fruit, I think, ripens somewhat ear- lier than upon other young trees of the same age which grow upon stocks of their own species. But the growth and vigour of the tree, and its power to nourish a succession of heavy crops, are diminished, apparently, by the stagnation in the branches and stock of a portion of that sap which, in a tree growing on its own stem, or upon a stock of its own species, w^ould descend to nourish and promote the extension of its own roots. The practice, therefore, of grafting the Pear on the Quince, and the Peach on the Plum, when extensive growth and durability are wanted is wrong; but it is eligible wherever it is wished to diminish the vigour and growth of the tree, and its durability is not so important." In adapting the graft to the soil the stock has a marked influ- ence. Thus in dry chalky soils Avhere the Peach on its own roots will scarcely grow, it is found to thrive admirably bud- ded on the Almond. We have already mentioned that in clay soils too heavy and moist for the Peach, it succeeds very well if worked on the Plum. M. Floss, a Prussian gardener, suc- ceeded in growing fine pears in very sandy soils, where it was nearly impossible to raise them before, by grafting them on the Mountain Ash, a nearly related tree, which thrives on the dryest and lightest soil. A variety of fruit which is found rather tender for a certain climate, or a particular neighbourhood, is frequently acclima- tised by grafting it on a native stock of very hardy habits. Thus near the sea-coast Awh ere the finer plums thrive badly, we have seen them greatly improved by being worked on the beech- plum, a native stock, adapted to the spot ; and the foreign grape is more luxuriant when grafted on our native stocks. A slight effect is sometimes produced by the stock on the quality of the fruit. A few sorts of pear are superior in fla- 2 26 PROPAGATION. vour, but many are also inferiour, when grafted on the Quince, while they are more gritty on the thorn. The Green Gage, a Plum of great delicacy of flavour, varies considerably upon dif- ferent stocks ; and Apples raised on the crab, and pears on the Mountain Ash, are said to keep longer than when grown on their own roots. In addition to the foregoing, a diseased stock should always be avoided, as it will communicate disease slowly to the g^aft, unless the latter is a variety of sufficient vigour to renewiihe health of the stock, which is but seldom the case. The cultivator will gather from these remarks that, in a fa- vourable climate and soil, if we desire the greatest growth, du- ration, and development in any fruit, (and this applies to or- chards generally,) we should choose a stock of a closely similar nature to the graft — an apple seedling for an apple; a pear seedling for a pear. If we desire dwarf trees, that come into bearing very young, and take little space in a garden, we em- l^loy for a stock an allied species of slower growth. If our soil or climate is unfavourable, we use a stock, which is adapted to the soil, or which will, by its hardier roots, endure the cold. The injiuence of the graft on the stock seems scarcely to ex- tend beyond the power of communicating disease. A graft taken from a tree enfeebled by disease, wdll recover with difficulty, even if grafted on healthy stocks for a dozen times in repeated succession. And when the disease is an inherent or hereditary one, it Avill certainly communicate it to the stock. We have seen the yellows, from a diseased peach tree, propagated through hundreds of individuals by budding, and the stock and graft both perish together from its effects. Hence the importance, to nurserymen especially, of securing healthy grafts, and working only upon healthy stocks. Propagation hy cuttings. Propagating by cuttings, as applied to fruit trees, consists in causing a shoot of the previous season's wood to grow, by detach- ing it from the parent tree at a suitable season, and planting it in the ground under favourable circumstances. In this case, instead of uniting itself by woody matter to another tree, as does the scion in grafting, the descending woody matter becomes roots at the lower end, and the cutting of which, is then a new and entire plant. Every bud being a distinct individual, capa- ble of forming a new plant, has indeed theoretically the power, if separated from the parent stem, of throwing out roots and main- taining a separate existence ; and some plants, as the grape vine, are frequently propagated by single buds planted in the soil. But in practice, it is found necessary, with almost all trees and ,pkint§, to retain a considerable portion of the stem with the bud CUTTINGS. 27 to supply it with food until it has formed roots to draAv nourish ment from the soil. All fruit trees may be propagated by cuttings with proper care and attention, but only a few grow with sufficient facility in this way to render their propagation by cuttings a common mode. These are the Gooseberry, the Currant, the Vine, the Quince, the Fig, and the Mulberry. Cuttings of the Currant, Gooseberry, and the hardy sorts of Vine, will root readily, in a soil not too dry, in the open garden. Currants and Gooseberries are generally taken off in the fall or winter, prepared for planting, and two-thirds of their lower ends buried in the ground till the commencement of spring, when they are planted out, either where they are to remain, or in nur- sery rows. If planted in autumn, they are liable to be thrown out by winter frosts. They will succeed nearly as well if taken off in the spring, but, owing to the period at which they commence growing, this must be attended to very early ^ if deferred till that season. In order to raise plants of the Gooseberry and Currant, with straight clean stems, Avhich shall not throw up suckers, it is only necessary, before plant- — tfji ^"S ^^ cutting, to cut out every eye or bud to be placed below the surface of the ground. Fig. 14. The cutting should be about a foot long, eight inches of which may be inserted in the ground. To insure greater success in raising the finer sorts of goose- berry, or other shrubs, it is customary to plant the cuttings on the shaded side of a wall or fence, in deep rich loam, rather damp than dry. Cuttings of the vine are generally prepared when trimming the Fie. 14. A *^^^ plants in autumn, or winter ; they may then be gooseberry cut-\)WY\Q^ with their lowcr ends in the ground, or kept *andpiant7d^ in earth in the cellar till spring. Scarce sorts of foreign grapes, which it is desirable to multiply extensively, are frequently propagated by joints ; that is, by buds having about two inches of wood attached to each — every bud in this way forming a plant. When this mode is adopted, it is usual to plant the joints about half an inch deep, in light soil, in a common hot bed prepared for the purpose, or each joint is planted in a pot by itself. In the first way a great number of plants may be grown in a small space. Success is more certain in propagating the vine by joints, where the joint is halved before Yw 15 planting, Fig. 15. .joint, prepared and planted. The large English black mul- berry is propagated by cuttings' 28 PROPAGATION. as follows : about the last of October, take cuttings from tbe thrifty shoots of a bearing tree, cut out all the buds except two or three at the top, and pare off the bottom of the cutting just below a bud. Lay-in the cuttings in a sheltered border, bury- ing them so that only the two buds at the top are exposed, and covering them with some loose straw or litter. In the spring, make a small hot-bed with very sandy soil in which to plant the cuttings on taking them out of the ground, or place each one in a small pot in any hot-bed ready at hand, and in a few weeks they will be found to have made roots freely. As a general rule, cuttings succeed best when they are taken off just between the young and the previous year's wood ; or, in the case of young side shoots, when they are cut off close to the branch preserving the collar of the shoot. The lower end should be cut smoothly across just below a bud, the soil should in all cases be pressed firmly about the lower end of the cutting, and it should always be planted before the buds commence swelling, that the wound may in some measure heal before growth and the absorption of fluid commences. Propagation hy Layers and Suckers. A layer may be considered as a cutting not entirely separated from the plant. Layering is a mode of propagation resorted to in increasing some fruit tree stocks, as the Paradise stock, the Muscle Plum, and some kinds which do not grow so well from the seed. Certain varieties of native grape, as the Bland's Virginia, which do not root readily by cuttings, are also raised in this way, and it may be applied to any sort of fruit tree which it is desirable to continue on its own root without grafting. Fruit trees are generally layered in the spring, and the layers may be taken off well-rooted plants in the autumn. But they may also be layered with success early in July. In making layers the ground around the mother plant should be made light and mellow by digging. Being provided with some hooked pegs to fast- ' en down the layers, bend down a branch, so that the end may recline upon the ground. Open a little trench three or four inches 4^^] f^ C deep to receive the young wood to be layered ; make a cut or tonirue Y\