GENETIC STUDIES ON DKOSOPIllLA VIRILIS WITH CONSIDERATIOiXS ON THE GENETICS OF OTHER SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA BY Charles W. Metz, Mildred S. Moses, AND Eleanor D. Mason QH43 M53 Published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington, July, 1923 i IM53 N^urtfj QIarolttta 01atp THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE DATE INDICATED BELOW AND IS SUB- JECT TO AN OVERDUE FINE AS POSTED AT THE CIRCULATION DESK. 1982 ,DEe^2 1 1983 innhA /in or> GENETIC STUDIES ON DROSOPIIILA VIRILIS WITH CONSIDERATIOxNS ON THE GENETICS OF OTHER SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA BY Chakles W. Metz, Mildred S. Moses, AND Eleanor D. Mason Published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington, July 1923 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON Publication No. 328 Copies of tliis iKWk first issued JUL 27 192.- JUDD & DETWEILEB, I>'C., WASHINGTON. D. C. CONTENTS. Page I. Introductory 5 General Introduction 5 Chromosome relationships 8 Chromosomes of Drosophila virilis 9 Previous work on Drosophila virilis 10 Present aim of the work 10 Description of Drosophila virilis 10 Source of material 11 Methods employed 12 Acknowledgments 13 II. Linkage Group I. Sex-linked Characters 14 Description, origin, and com- parison of sex-linked charac- ters 14 Sepia 14 Yellow 15 Fraj'ed 15 Crossveinless 15 Vermilion 15 Vesiculated 15 Oblique 16 Singed 17 Hairy 17 Magenta 17 Forked 17 Triangle 18 Short 18 Cut 18 Rugose 19 Glazed 19 Wax 19 Droop 20 Linkage in Group I, and con, struction of X-chromosome map 21 Sepia 22 Yellow 22 Frayed 22 Crossveinless 22 Vermilion 22 Vesiculated 23 Singed 23 Oblique 23 Hairy 24 Magenta and forked 24 Triangle and short 24 Cut 25 Rugose, glazed and wax 26 Droop 26 III. Linkage Group II 32 De.scription, origin, and com- parison of characters in Group II 32 Confluent 32 Concave 32 Double 32 Broken 33 Page III. Linkage Group II— Continued. Linkage data 34 Detection of linkage in Group II 34 Confluent and concave 34 Double with concave and confluent 34 Confluent and broken 34 Cross-over values in Group ,11 .34 Confluent and concave 34 Confluent and double 34 Confluent and broken 35 Construction of second-chromo- some map 35 IV. Linkage Group III 35 Description, origin, and compar- ison of characters in Group III 37 Scaly 37 Spread 37 Hunch 3S Telescoped 38 Garnet 39 Linkage data 39 Detection of linkage in Group III 39 Scaly and telescoped 39 Steel and telscoped 39 Hunch and telescoped 39 Scaly, hunch, and telescoped 39 Scaly and garnet 40 Hunch, telescoped, and spread 40 Cross-over values in Group HI 40 Scaly and htmch 40 Scaly and telescoped 40 Scaly and spread 40 Scaly, hunch, and telescoped 40 Scaly, hunch, telescoped, and garnet 41 Spread and garnet 41 Construction of third-chromo- some map 41 V. Linkage Group IV 43 Description and origin of char- acters in Group IV 43 Acute 43 Pinched 44 Hump 44 Linkage data 44 Detection of linkage in Group IV 44 Acute and pinched 44 Acute and iiump 44 Pinched and hump 45 Complete linkagr of acute, pinched, and hump 45 1 1 7'1 :>7 Contents. Page VI. Linkage Group V 46 Description, origin, and com- parison of characters in Group V 46 Fused 46 Interrupted 46 Branched 47 Approximated 47 Ruffled 47 Linkage data 48 Detection of hnkage in Group V 48 Branched and fused 48 Branched and approximated 48 Fused and interrupted 48 Interrupted and approxi- mated 48 Branched and ruffled 48 Cross-over values 48 Fused and interrupted 48 Fused and branched 49 Fused and approximated ... 49 Interrupted and branched . 49 Interrupted and approxi- mated 49 Branched and ruffled 50 Discussion 50 V'll. Linkage Gnoup VI 51 Bent 51 Linkage tests with bent 52 Net 52 VIII. Additional Characters 54 Extra 54 Spine 54 Capsule 54 Minus 55 IX. Comparison of mutant characters in D. virilis with those in other species of Drosophila 56 Page IX. Comparison of mutant characters — Continued. Comparison of sex-linked char- acters 57 Forked and singed series 57 In D. melanogaster 59 In D. mrilis 60 In D. willistoni 60 In D. obscura 60 In D. simulans 60 In D. funebris 60 Relationships 61 Comparison with sex-linked characters in D. melanogaster 63 Comparison with sex-linked characters in D. simulans. . . 64 Comparison with sex-linked characters in D. willistoni. . 64 Comparison with sex-linked characters in D. obscura. ... 65 Comparison with sex-linked characters in D. funebris. ... 66 Comparison of autosomal char- acters 66 X. The case of vermilion, and the possi- bility of a rearrangement of genes 69 XI. Comparison of X-chromosome maps 71 XII. Coincidence 75 XIII. Chromosomes and linkage groups compared 77 XIV. Tabulation of linkage experiments 79 Group 1 79 Group II 90 Group III 90 Group IV 90 Group V 91 XV. Literature cited 93 GENETIC STUDIES ON DROSOPIIILA VIRILIS. I. INTRODUCTORY. GENERAL INTRODUCTION. In most groups of animals and plants, including those susceptible to genetic study through intensive breeding, the chromosome groups of related species show a high degree of uniformity. The different members of a genus, for instance, usually differ relatively little in this regard. In some cases the uniformity may extend even to sub- families or families, as, for example, in the Acridida? among the Orthoptera, where all of approximately 40 genera studied agree in having essentially the same chromosome group (cf. McClung, 1914; Harvey, 1916). It would seem probable, a priori, that where many related species exhibit such a constancy in chromosome groups, the apparent homology of chromosomes is real, i. e., similar chromosomes in different species are essentially alike in genetic make-up. On the other hand, there are various exceptions to the general rule of constancy, and a number of cases are known in which closely related species have very dissimilar chromosome groups. Hence it may be argued that even where a constancy exists it may be superficial and not dependent upon, or significant of, a likeness in genetic constitution of similar chromosomes. In fact, very little is known as to how far morphological criteria are trustworthy as indications of homology between chromosomes. In one case recently investigated by Lancefield and Metz (1921, 1922), the results indicate that genetic homology does not correspond to morpho- logical similarity as regards two pairs of chromosomes in Drosophila willistoni compared with two similar pairs in D. vielanog aster. These and other considerations serve to emphasize the necessity of learning something of the genetic constitution of chromosomes before they can safely be compared from the evolutionary standpoint. It is believed that the only method of obtaining rehable information on chromosome evolution is by means of genetic analysis combined with cytological observation. Ideal material for such a study would be provided by a group of species satisfying the following four requirements: In the first place, it should exhibit among its members a series of different chromosome groups; secondly, the species should be susceptible to intensive breeding under controlled conditions; in the third place, one or more of the species should be favorable for genetic analysis through the study of mutant races; and lastly, the species should hybridize with one another and give fertile hybrids. 5 D. H. HILL LIBRARY North Carolina State College 6 Introductory. Many cases of species hybrids are known, and some have been studied extensively. Those involving domestic or semidomestic animals, e. g., the mule, ducks, pheasants, etc., are too well known to need more than a mention, as are also those of numerous cultivated plants. Likewise, various kinds of fish hybrids have long been familiar. The work of Federley (1914, 1915) and Harrison and Doncaster (1914) has revealed the fact that hybridization is readily obtained in some families of Lepidoptera. That of de Vries, Davis, Bartlett, and others on Oenothera and of East and others on Nicotiana has demonstrated the same thing for these groups. The list might be continued at length, but the examples given include many of the most thoroughly studied cases. None of the groups known to be favorable for hybridization, however, fulfils the other requirements necessary for a detailed study of chromosome relationships, such as we are considering here. The genus Drosophila has long been known to include species that are excellent for breeding purposes, and the pioneer work of Morgan and others on D. melanogaster indicated that this species, at least, mutates frequently enough to provide ample material for genetic analysis. Consequently, when it was found (Metz, 1914) that other species of Drosophila differed from melanogaster and from one another in respect to their chromosomes, it was recognized that the material offered unusual possibilities for a study of chromosome relationships and chromosome evolution. The only uncertainty was with regard to the possibility of hybridization. If favorable in that respect, all of the above requirements would be fulfilled. With this in mind, an extensive series of tests was carried out cooperatively by Dr. A. H. Sturtevant and one of us (Metz) during 1914 and 1915, involving most of the species obtainable in the United States and Cuba, save those that were not at all amenable to laboratory treatment. The results of these tests were all negative, however. This presented a serious difficulty, since it indicated that if such a comparative study were undertaken with this material it would be necessary to make separate genetic studies of selected species and then compare the results. However, an excellent foundation for such an investigation was provided by the well-known observations on D. melanogaster; and since a study of this kind promised to be of interest in several addi- tional respects, it was undertaken. It should be noted at this point that Dr. Sturtevant has recently succeeded in hybridizing D. melanogaster and D. simulans (Sturte- vant, 1920) with very interesting results. For the purposes outlined above, however, the possibilities here are limited. The two species are almost identical and appear to have identical chromosome groups, and in addition the Fi hybrids are sterile, so that only mutant General Introduction. " " . II . II ^^^^fc ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^ ^ ^^^ • ^^^^ M. M II ^ !?> ^^.-^ II M r^ f\\ Al ? J o 9 K d" _ . ^ ? L c? Fig. 1. — Types of Drosophila chromosome groups. (From Metz, 19166). All but type H are found in the genus Drosophila. H is from Cladochaeta nebulosa Coq. n ir II II ^ D. melanogaster d" D.simulans O.virilis ^^^ Jj^ C> • C^ _ , ^ ^ ^ At D.funebris D willistoni o D. obscura cC Fig. 2. — Chromosome groups of species of Drosophila which are being studied genetically. r 8 Introductory. genes obtained in both species can be used for comparison. Further details concerning this case are given in a later section. Owing to the fact that the material for the present work, and for other investigations of a similar kind, has been selected largely on the basis of apparent chromosome relationships, these may be con- sidered briefly here. CHROMOSOME RELATIONSHIPS. The known types of chromosome groups found in the genus Drosophila, with the addition of one type from the related genus Cladochceta, are represented in figure 1 (from Metz, 19166). A detailed comparison of the various types is given in the paper just cited, and we may hmit ourselves to features concerning the species under genetic observation. The types represented by the latter are shown in figure 2.^ In this figure the sex chromosomes, where identified are represented in solid black, and where not definitely known, the ones presumed to be the sex chromosomes are cross-ruled. Considering first the sex chromosomes, it may be noted that two main kinds are involved — the short, rod-like form found in D. melanogaster, simulans, and virilis, and the long V-shaped form found in willistoni and obscura. In funebris the sex chromosomes have not been identified, although the behavior of the longest pair suggests that it represents the sex chromosomes. Comparing the autosomes, it is seen that the same two sorts are represented — short rods and long V's — in addition to the small, dot-like pair common to all save possibly D. willistoni. In both the autosomes and the sex chromosomes, it is to be noted that the V-shaped members are approximately twice the size of the rod-like ones (with the exception of one pair in D. funebris) and that each has a constriction in the middle. This suggests a possible relation- ship between the types which may best be appreciated, perhaps, by imagining all of the V-shaped chromosomes broken in the middle, at the point of constriction. With this alteration all of the groups conform essentially to one type, that represented by D. virilis. For the present purposes, this series of chromosome groups repre- sents an almost ideal condition. There are clear-cut differences between the types, yet the differences do not appear to be purely at random, and it is possible to compare the individual tjT)es, chro- mosome for chromosome. The relations between the types suggest the hypothesis that the latter have arisen by a process involving the breaking up of large V-shaped chromosomes into rods or, vice versa, by the fusion of rods to form V's. If this hypothesis is correct, genetic analysis should reveal the fact through the resemblance between groups of linked * Exclusive of two or three species which have only been studied slightly. Chromosome Relationships. 9 characters, or portions of such groups, in the different species. For instance, each of the large non-sex-Hnked groups of characters in D. melanog aster should resemble two of the groups in virilis com- bined, while the sex-linked groups should correspond in the two species. This is only one of the possible hypotheses to cover the case, but it will serve to illustrate the mode of attack. » 2 3 Fig. 3. — Camera lucida drawings of chromosomes of Drosophila virilis. 1 and 2 from ovarian cells, 3 from a spermatogonia! cell. Such considerations are, of course, based on the assumption that homologous mutant characters may be found in the species concerned. The validity of this assumption is becoming more and more probable as the work progresses (see below), and the question now hinges mainly on whether or not a sufficient number of homologous charac- ters may be obtained for the purpose. CHROMOSOMES OF DROSOPHILA VIRILIS. The chromosome group of D. virilis, as noted above, consists of 6 pairs, 5 of which are rod-like and of approximately the same size, and 1 of which is small and spherical. The small pair normally lies in the center of the figure during metaphase, as shown in the accom- panying figures (fig. 3). In size, position, and behavior this pair agrees with the similar pair in most other species of Drosophila (Metz, 19166). The five pairs of rod-like chromosomes have a terminal spindle- fiber attachment and hence are usually arranged radially in metaphase (figs. 1 and 2, Metz, 1916a). As in other species of Diptera, homol- ogous chromosomes are normally associated in pairs in the somatic cells, as well as in the germ cells.' In some figures one of the five rod-like pairs appears to be slightly longer than the others, suggesting that it may represent the sex chromosomes. But since no pair is conspicuously dimorphic in the male, this view has not been corroborated. It seems practically certain, however, from both cytological and genetic evidence, that one of the rod-like pairs, and not the small spherical pair, is the sex-chromosome pair. 1 For a discussion of this feature see Metz, 1916a. 10 Introductory. PREVIOUS WORK ON DROSOPHILA VIRILIS. In earlier papers on Drosophila virilis (Metz and Metz, 1915; Metz, 1916c, 1916d, 1918, 1920; Weinstein, 1920) it has been shown that the genetic behavior of this species agrees in a general way with that of the well-known D. melanogaster and that some of its mutant characters bear a striking resemblance to those of melanogaster. In genetic behavior, for instance, the two species agree, (1) in that ''crossing-over" occurs only in the female, (2) in that the Y chro- mosome appears to be functionless as far as the ordinary Mendelian characters are concerned, and (3) in that the number of groups of linked characters agrees with, or at least does not exceed, the haploid number of chromosomes. In regard to the resemblance between mutant characters, it has been found that the four characters con- fluent, yellow, forked, and crossveinless are sufficiently similar in the two species to give some ground for believing them to be homolo- gous, and that the likeness between certain others suggests a similar relation. PRESENT AIM OF THE WORK. With the completion of the preliminary tests, concerning the general genetic behavior of D. virilis, attention was directed partic- ularly to the genetic analysis of the chromosomes by means of mutant characters, and a detailed comparison of the results with those obtained in other species of Drosophila. The latter feature, and the work of the different investigators involved, is considered in detail in later sections. It may be stated at the outset that the studies have not yet progressed to the point of giving final answers to the main questions toward which they are directed. The aim of the present paper, therefore, is primarily to bring together the data and to indicate the trend of the results thus far obtained. For this reason it is largely descriptive. The descriptive part is also emphasized, necessarily, because of the fact that detailed information concerning both the appearance and the genetic behavior of mutant characters is necessary before those of different species can be com- pared satisfactorily. DESCRIPTION OF DROSOPHILA VIRILIS. The following taxonomic description of D. virilis Sturtevant is taken from Sturtevant's (1921c) "The North American species of Drosophila," p. 97: "&, 9 . Arista with about five branches above and two below. AntennjE brown, third joint dark opaque reddish-brown. Front over one-third width of head, wider above; dull coffee-brown, ocellar dot black. Second orbital one-third other two. Second oral bristle three-quarters length of first. Only one long bristle on each palpus. Carina broad, slightly sulcate, nose-like; face somewhat shiny, brown. Cheeks yellowish brown; their greatest width over one-fourth greatest diameter of eyes. Eyes pilose. Source of Material. 11 "Achrosticlial hairs in six rows; no prescutellars. Mcsonotum and scutellum dark dull-brown. Pleura; and abdomen dull brown, somewhat darker. Legs pale brown . Apical and preapical bristles on first and second tibiae, preapicals on third. "Wings clear, veins brown. Costal index about 2.8; fourth-vein index about 1.8; 5x index about 1.2; 4c index about 0.9. "Length body 2.8 mm.; wing 3.0 mm. "The eggs have four filaments. The females do not ordinarily begin to lay until they are 4 or 5 days old. About 3 weeks are required for development. "The small eyes and broad cheeks make this species obviously distinct from such types as D. robusta that resemble it superficially." Supplementary to the above, especial attention may be called to certain characteristics that are particularly noticeable in living specimens or that need to be kept in mind in considering the com- parison of mutant characters with those of other species: The dark dull-brown body-color and large size of D. virilis contrast sharply with the yellowish gray color and small size of such species as D. melanog aster, D. simulans, and D. willistoni. The color more nearly resembles that of D. ohscura, but is duller and lighter. It is duller and darker than that of D. funehris and lacks the olive tone of the latter. The eyes of D. virilis are dark, dull, reddish brown, more opaque than those of melanog aster, simulans, willistoni, or ohscura. Virilis males do not possess the tarsal "sex-combs" found in melanogaster, simulans, and ohscura. In this respect they agree with the males of willistoni and funehris. A wild-type or normal male of D. virilis is shown in figure 1 of plate 1. SOURCE OF MATERIAL. The original stock of Drosophila virilis Sturtevant, used in our ex- periments, was derived from a single pair hatched from a pineapple exposed at Columbia University, in November, 1913, by Dr. A. H. Sturtevant, Nearly all of our work has been based on descendants of this one pair, which have been kept in the laboratory, in bottles, for 8 years, or approximately 136 generations. In 1919 a second stock col- lected at Terre Haute, Indiana, was obtained from Dr. Roscoe Hyde. One mutant character (hump) was found in this stock soon after it was secured and others appeared subsequently. The two stocks have been more or less intercrossed in the course of the experiments. They appear to be identical in all respects and we have made no effort to keep them separated. Since no other records of this species are known save one from Los Angeles, California, and one from a doubtful specimen taken at Chattanooga, Tennessee (Sturtevant, 1. c, p. 97), it is practically certain that our stocks have never been contaminated from sources outside the laboratory. It may be noted in this connection that no decrease in fertility has been observed in the stocks during their 8 years' confinement in the laboratory. 12 Introductory. METHODS EMPLOYED. Detailed methods of treatment of the data are given under the respective headings below, but the following general features may be noted at this point. For the sake of convenience, a description of each mutant type is given in the present paper, whether it has been published previously or not. Some of these include features that have previously been overlooked or omitted. In connection with the descriptions brief notes are added (under "Comparison"), indicating resemblances to characters in the other species, if such exist. The absence of such comparison indicates that no similar characters are known to us. These comparisons are given very briefly, for a full consideration of such relationships is included in later sections. The terminology used is that commonly employed at the present time in animal genetics. Symbols have been avoided as far as is practicable in the tables and text, although they have necessarily been used extensively. Recessive mutant characters, or genes, are designated by small letters and dominants by capitals. Super- scripts are employed only in the case of multiple allelomorphs. In order to simplify treatment of the experimental data, the name of a mutant type is frequently used to designate either the character itself or the gene responsible for the character or the locus of the gene, without distinction. Although this usage is possibly open to some criticism, its great convenience justifies its adoption, we believe, at least when care is taken to qualify the expression where clarity demands. Since the purpose of this study is comparative, the linkage experi- ments have been carried only far enough to indicate the relative order of the genes and their approximate "locations" on the chro- mosome map. No corrections have been made for differential viability or double crossing-over in constructing the maps. Likewise, map values have in nearly all cases been given in whole numbers. It is believed that any attempt to make a more refined calculation or to express values in decimals would in most cases give a false impres- sion of accuracy. It is for this reason, for instance, that the method suggested by Fisher (1922) has not been used. For certain types of work the latter method promises to be useful, but, as indicated by Fisher himself, when applied to cases like the present it gives values only slightly different from those obtained by the more simple method of calculation used here. Several characters have been included which overlap normal to such an extent as to make them unsatisfactory for detailed linkage studies, but which are valuable for comparative studies. On the other hand, sex-linked lethals have been omitted, since they are of little value for purposes of comparison. M ETZ PLAT E 1 '"^BW&^t i^f^^^y -^^^^^^^^ 5 E. M. Wallace Pinx. SEX-LINKED MUTANT CHARACTERS IN DROSOPHILA VIRILIS 1. WILD-TYPE o- 2. YELLOW CROSSVEINLESS 3. FORKED" IVI T- A Acknowledgments. 13 In a study of this kind, in which new characters are appearing from time to time, there are always some on hand which have not been fully studied in respect to linkage. This is true of several in the present case. These have been included for the sake of completeness, although in some instances little can be given beyond the description of the character and its mode of origin. The method of detecting linkage among non-sex-linked characters, and thus of assorting them into linkage groups, has been by means of F2 counts, and back-crosses of heterozygous males. In the earlier experiments each new character was tested with representa- tives of all known linkage groups, and most of the characters have been so tested; but more recently the tests have been discontinued as soon as a character was found to be linked to one of the test char- acters. The data from these purely test experiments are not included, except in the cases showing linkage. In considering each linkage group, the data from the test experi- ments are all given first; then follow the experiments from which crossover values are taken. This method of treatment facilitates examination of the linkage data. The order of the genes on the maps has been determined in the usual manner, mainly by means of three-point crosses. In the latter case the smallest cross-over class has been assumed to represent the double cross-overs and the order has been arranged accordingly. In a few cases the order has been determined by ''locating" a gene with reference to two others independently. The records of matings given in the text and tables refer to the original laboratory notes. Those not prefixed, or prefixed by V, L, or M are records of C. W. Metz, those prefixed by E are records of E. D. Mason, and those prefixed by P are records of M. S. Moses. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We are indebted to Professor T. H. Morgan and to Doctors A. H. Sturtevant, C. B. Bridges, and D. E. Lancefield for the loan of specimens and for information concerning mutant characters in other species of Drosophila, and also for suggestions as to their possible relationships to characters in D. virilis. Dr. Bridges has furnished information on D. melanog aster, Dr. Sturtevant on melano- gaster and simulans, and Dr. Lancefield on obscura. Our indebted- ness is particularly great to Dr. Sturtevant, whose interest and cooperation have added materially to the progress of the work from its inception. We likewise acknowledge with gratitude the assistance of the following persons, who made the drawings and photographs for the accompanying figures: Miss E. M. Wallace, figures 5 and 12 and plate 1; Miss G. Ruth Lincks, figures 4 and 6; Miss E. M. Lord, plates 2 to 4. 14 Linkage Group I. II. LINKAGE GROUP I. SEX-LINKED CHARACTERS. The sex-linked group consists of 18 characters. These are listed in table 1 in chronological order. The first 10 have been described previously (Nos. 1 to 4, Metz, 1916c?; Nos. 5 to 8, Metz, 1918; No. 9, Metz, 19206; No. 10, Weinstein, 1920). In the accompanying descriptions the order of treatment is not chronological, but conforms to the order of the genes on the chromosome map. Under each heading is given a description of the character, an account of its origin, and a comparison with similar characters in other species where such are known. Table 1 . — Chronological list of sex- inked characters in Drosophila virilis. Character. Symbol. Parts affected. First ob- served. Found by — Record. Yellow Magenta Glazed y m f r V8 fd ha r" c T V se dp si s o ct Body-color Eye-color Eyes Jan. 1916.. June 1916. . Do. Do. Do. July 1916.. Sept. 1916.. Nov. 1916 B. S. Metz.. C. W. Metz. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Weinstein . . . Mason Metz Mason Moses Do. Metz Do. 2127. ac stock, stock. C stock. V611. V290. V 590. V745. V 1095. Weinstein. 1920. E 1. L404. E780. P220. P384. M47 M 102. Forked Bristles Eyes Rugose Vesiculated Frayed Wings Abdomen Hairy Eyes Wax Eyes May 1917.. Nov. 1917.. Oct. 1919.. Do. Mar. 1920.. Oct. 1920.. Nov. 1920. . June 1922 . . Do. Crossveinless Triangle Vermilion Sepia Wing veins Wing veins. Eye-color Eye-color Wings Droop Singed Short Bristles and hairs Wing veins Wings Oblique Cut Wings DESCRIPTION, ORIGIN AND COMPARISON OF SEX-LINKED CHARACTERS. Sepia (se). (Plate 1, Figure 6.) Description. — The only visible effect of sepia is on the eyes, which are deep opaque brown, almost lacking in red. The character is readily recognized in both young and old flies, but is most striking in young ones. Origin. — (L404) 8 sepia males were obtained from a mating of 2 heterozygous pinched females with one mosaic (or deformed) male. (The male may have been a true mosaic or merely deformed by injury. Its left wing was short and the scutellar bristles on the left side were forked. Evidently its germ-cells were not affected, however, for the character did not appear again in its descendants.) Comparison. — Sepia bears a general resemblance to various dark eye-colors in other species (e. g., prune, ruby, purple in Drosophila melanogaster, and prune and plum in D. simulans), and also to magenta and garnet in D. virilis. The flat or opaque nature of the color, with a minimum of red in its composition, particularly suggests "prune" in melanogaster and simulans. Description of Characters. 15 Yellow (y). (Plate 1, Figure 2.) Description.— YqWow changes the ground-color of the entire fly from dark brown to yellow (compare figs. 1 and 2, plate 1). The change is especially noticeable in the wings, although it is readily observable in body and legs, especially in young flics. Very old flies are darkened, so that the body-color approaches that of pale specimens of non-yellow stocks. The color of the hairs and bristles in yellow flics is not notice- ably different from normal. They may be faintly tinged with bronze, but if so the change is very slight. Yellow averages slightly later than normal flies in hatching, and has somewhat lowered viability. Origin. — (1281, 2127.) Several males appeared in a mass culture. (See Metz. 1916d, p. 599.) Comparison. — Yellow resembles the "yellow" of D. melanogaster, D. simnlanB, D. willistoni, and D. obscura, except for its brown instead of bronze or yellow bristles and hairs.* In each of these species the character is sex-linked, and it is possible that they are all homologous. Frayed (fd). Description. — In frayed flies the dorsal bands of the pigment on the abdomen are frayed out or irregularly broken at the ends as they extend down the sides of the body. Accompanying this are various other modifications. Almost the entire fly is affected in some way (see figs. 3 and 6, Metz, 1918); the thoracic bristles are reduced to little more than hairs; some of the bristles on the head are entirely gone; frequently the aristae, and sometimes the entire antennae, are abortive or wanting; the wings are frequently broken and disarranged in various ways; and finally, development is retarded several days, so that frayed flies hatch several days later than normal. Frayed is recessive to wild-type. The stock was lost soon after the character first appeared, owing to the sterility of the females. Origin. — (V 590.) Several males appeared in a mass culture (see Metz, 1918, p. 110). Crossveinless (c). (Plate 1, Figure 2.) Description. — This character is distinguished by the absence of the posterior cross-vein and sometimes part or all of the anterior cross-vein. Origin. — (See Weinstein, 1920.) Comparison. — Crossveinless resembles the crossveinless of D. melanogaster and non-sex-linked characters of the same general type in D. obscura and D. willistoni (unpublished data). Vermilion (v). (Plate 1, Figure 5.) Description. — Vermilion, like sepia, is an eye-color character. The color is near Ridgeway's scarlet, but slightly darker and more yellowish. Vermilion is also char- acterized by the presence of the dark fleck in the eye, which is absent in the other stocks of virilis. It bears a close resemblance to the eye-color of the wild type D. melanogaster, with perhaps a darker tinge. It can be distinguished from normal in flies of any age. Origin. — (E 1.) One male was found in a stock bottle. Comparison. — In appearance vermilion suggests the characters of the same name in D. melanogaster, obscura, and willistoni (unpublished data of Miss Ruth Ferry), although the actual color is considerably darker than in these sj)ecies. Vesiculated (vs). (Plate 2, Figure 2.) Description. — Vesiculated is characterized by the presence of vesicles or blisters in the wings. Occasionally the entire wing may be swollen into a single large vesicle 'In the latter respect it suggests "lemon" in D. melanogaster (Morg.in and Bridgei, 1916). In lemon, however, the males are infertile and have low viability, and the females are unknown- 16 Linkage Group I. filled with liquid, but usually there is only a small blister, or perhaps two near the center of the wing. Frequently only one wing is affected, and ordinarily in from 1 to 5 per cent of the cases both wings appear to be normal. The viability of vesicu- lated stock is good, and aside from the inconstancy just mentioned the character is good for linkage studies. Origin. — (V 290.) Several males were obtained from a mass culture (see Metz, 1918, p. 107). Comparison. — Vesiculated suggests "inflated" in D. melanogaster (Weinstein, 1918), "bubble" in D. simulans (Sturtevant unpublished data), and "inflated" in D. funebris (Sturtevant, unpublished data). Fig. 4. — Singed. Oblique (o). (Plate 2, Figures 3 and 4.) Description. — Oblique males differ from normal in nearly all parts of the body. In size they are smaller; in body-color considerably darker; in eye-color extremely dark, becoming almost black with age. The body is much shorter and stouter than usual, the wings are short, broad, and sometimes obliquely blunted instead of being rounded (fig. 3, plate 2), and usually hang do\vn over the sides of the abdomen, roof-like, instead of being held horizontally. The fifth vein is often short and the posterior crossvein is often broken or wanting. Oblique females are sterile and conse- quently pure stock has not been obtained. The name of this character was taken from its appearance in combination with short. In this combination both char- acters are exaggerated; the wings are frequently very short and cut off obliquely at the tips (fig. 4, plate 2), and the veins are shortened more than in ordinary "short" flies. Origin. — (M 47.) 16 oblique males were found among the offspring of 2 females heterozygous for vermilion and short. Description of Characters. 17 Singed (si). (Figure 4.) Description. — Singed affects the bristles and hairs, particularly on the body and legs. The bristles are shortened and depressed and are twisted and curled, as if singed. The hairs are likewise depressed and sometimes curled. The hairs in the wings are affected slightly, if at all. Those on the costa lie in approximately a normal position, instead of standing out at an angle from the wing, as they tend to do in forked flies. The eggs and the body-color are normal, or very near normal. The character is ordinarily used as a recessive, and is the same in males and in homo- zygous females. It is possible to distinguish heterozygous females from the wild type, however, by their shorter, less tapering bristles. Singed flies have good viability, and both sexes are fertile, making the character one of the most useful for linkage studies. Origin. — (P. 220.) A single male was obtained from glazed stock. Comparison. — (See page 60.) Hairy (ha). Description. — Superficially hairy resembles "rugose," but it lacks the light color of the latter and has a sprinkling of heavy black hairs over the eye-surface, giving it a peculiar bushy appearance entirely wanting in rugose. Typical specimens of hairy are readily recognized, but the character varies considerably and is not always readily distinguished. The stock was discarded after a few linkage experiments were completed. Origin. — (V 745.) One male was found among the offspring of a single pair. (See Metz, 1918, p. 60.) Magenta (m). (Plate 1, Figure 7.) Description. — Magenta is very similar to sepia, but is slightly more reddish in tone and is a "deeper" or more "liquid" color instead of being "flat," as in the case of sepia. The character is more marked in the males than in the females, but is usually readily recognizable in either sex. It is almost, if not quite, indistignuishable from the third chromosome dominant "garnet." The viability of magenta flies is excellent and the character is one of the best for linkage studies. Origin. — Magenta was first observed in half of the sons of an "acute" female. (Metz, 1918, p. 599.) Comparison. — Magenta suggests "garnet" in D. melanogasfer and "carmine" in D. simulans. Forked (f). (Plate 1, Figure 3.) Description. — In forked flies the bristles on the head, thorax, and legs are shorter and stouter than usual, are often irregularly twisted, or bent at sharp angles, and a few are usually forked. The hairs are not greatly affected, but are somewhat stouter and less tapering than usual. The thorax is darkened and has a characteristic glossy appearance. Males and homozygous females are similar; heterozygous females, like those of singed, have the bristles slightly shortened. The eggs appear to be normal. Forked resembles singed in its affect on the bristles and hairs, but is much less extreme than the latter. The bristles and hairs are not flattened do\vn or tightly twisted as in singed. On the legs they are only slightly affected in forked, while they are markedly affected in singed flies. The marginal hairs on the costal vein of the wing stand out at a greater angle than usual, especially toward the back of the wing. In singed the hairs on the abdomen are twisted and depressed, while in forked they are almost normal. In the double recessive forked-singed males the hairs and 18 Linkage Group I. bristles resemble singed, but the presence of forked is revealed by the dark, glossy color of the thorax. Both sexes are fertile, but have poor viability. Origin. — A single male from a mating in which only one female parent was used. (See Metz, 1916, p. 600.) Comparison. — (See p. 60.) Triangle (T). (Plate 2, Figures 5 and 6.) Description. — Triangle flies usually have an extra cross-vein between the costal and second veins near their junction, and have the anterior cross-vein thickened at its junction with the third vein (fig. 6, plate 2). The latter characteristic can usually be detected in the few flies that fail to show the former. Sometimes the character resembles the non-sex-linked dominant confluent. Triangle is a dominant character, but is not lethal when homozygous. Origin. — The origin of triangle is not definitely known, since it was for a time confused with branched, a non-sex-linked character. The separation of triangle from branched was accomplished by Dr. Alexander Weinstein. Short (s). (Plate 2, Figure 7.) Description. — Short is more extreme in the males than in the females. In the former the fifth vein is greatly shortened. Usually it does not extend much beyond the posterior cross-vein, and frequently does not reach this vein. Approximately half of the flies have the fourth vein slightly shortened also. In extreme cases the cross-vein curves back to meet the fifth vein, or is curved back toward it, instead of being straight. In the females the fifth vein is usually slightly shortened, but the fourth is seldom affected, and often the wings appear to be normal. Origin. — (P. 384.) One male was obtained from a pair mating. Comparison. — Short resembles the character of the same name in D. vnllistoni (Lancefield and Metz, 1922) and in D. obscura (D. E. Lancefield, 1922). Cut (ct). (Plate 2, Figures 8 to 10.) Description. — It should be noted in connection with the following description that the gene for cut, if not allelomorphic to that for short, may be accompanied by short in the same chromosome, and hence the effects described may be due to the com- bination and not to cut alone. Cut flies, of both sexes, have short, narrow wings, held at an angle from the body, and cut in at the apex, between the longitudinal veins (fig. 8, plate 2). The cuts vary in depth from slight indentations to deep in- cisions. The venation is irregular; the costal vein ends between the second and third veins; the tips of the fifth, and sometimes of the other veins, are swollen, delta- like; the second vein occasionally fails to reach the margin, and may fork at the tip or send off a branch toward the third vein; the posterior cross- vein is usually gone or broken; the anterior cross- vein is thickened, and lateral branches or swellings frequently project from the longitudinal veins. The more common positions for the latter are down from the second vein and from the fourth vein near the apex. Fre- quently the wings are very small and are swollen or blistered. The anterior scutellar bristles are usually gone, or small and slender, and the posterior scutellars are often erect, or in abnormal positions, while the scutellum itself is shorter than usual. Cut flies do not breed readily, but both sexes are fertile to some extent and it is possible to keep pure stock. In some (and possibly all) females heterozygous for cut, the tip of the fifth vein is slightly thickened or delta-like (fig. 10, plate 2). This feature was overlooked at first, hence we are not certain that it is constant. In females heterozygous for cut, and carrying short in the opposite X chromo- some (possibly homozygous for short), the wings are smaller than usual, are held at an angle from the body, and usually droop down over the sides; the tips of the fifth ■METZ PLATE 2 8 Sex-iinkki) Mutant Ciiakacters in Dkosophii.a viuii i-. 1, Wi!(l-tyi)c: 2, Ncsiciilatod; 3. ()l)!i(iuc; J, Ol'licpio sliort ; ">, Tri;in;:li>; ti. 1 riauniL-; 7, Sliort; S, Cut; 9, Heterozygous short cut 9 ; 10, Iletcrozyudus cut 9. Description of Characters. 19 veins, and sometimes of the third, are delta-like (fig. 9, plate 2) ; the posterior cross- vein is sometimes broken, and occasionally the entire wing is soft in texture. The origin and behavior of cut are such that we are unable to tell, as yet, whether the character is an allelomorph of short or is due to a dominant modifier closely linked to short. The character itself seems to be of the opposite nature from that of short, increasing instead of diminishing the size of the veins, which argues somewhat against its being an allelomorph. On the other hand, it should be noted that in females heterozygous for cut the same vein (fifth) is affected as is affected by short. The absence of cross-overs between the two genes (thus far) indicates that if not allelomorphic they must be very closely linked. Origin. — (M 102.) From a mating (M 40) of a female heterozygous for short and vermilion, by 2 short garnet brothers, approximately 200 offspring of the expected classes were obtained, and in addition one female with the wings slightly spread and the end of each fifth vein thickened. This female proved to be heterozygous for cut. Her daughters were all normal, but her sons were of two classes, approximately half (19) short and half (16) cut. The data in this case show that the mother of this exceptional female was not heterozygous for cut, else cut sons and additional hete- rozygous daughters should have appeared. The mutation evidently occurred in one of the parents or in the egg that gave rise to this female. Comparison. — Cut shows a slight resemblance to "bifid" in D. melanogaster (Mor- gan and Bridges, 1916, p. 29), but not enough to make homology probable. Rugose (r). Description. — This character derives its name from the roughening of the eye due to disarrangement of the ommatidia (fig. 4, Metz, 1918). The color of the eye is also affected, being considerably lighter than normal and having a more yellowish tinge. The eye is full-sized, however, and the ommatidia are not coalescent, as they tend to be in the two following characters glazed and wax. Rugose is sex- limited, appearing only in the males. Its viability is excellent. Origin. — (V611.) One male from a pair mating of a confluent male by normal female (Metz, 1918, p. 110). Glazed (r«). Description. — Glazed is a more extreme eye modification than its allelomorph rugose. The ommatidia show greater disarrangement, many are lacking, leaving smooth spaces on the eye-surface, and others tend to coalesce. The whole eye has a glazed or varnished appearance, but lacks the lighter color shown by rugose. It appears in both sexes. Glazed females are usually sterile and the males have poor viabihty, making the character less useful than rugose. Origin. — Glazed appeared slightly before, and independently of, rugose. One male was found in a mass culture (see Metz, 19l6d, p. 599). Comparison. — (See under wax, below.) Wax (r"). Description.— Wax flies resemble glazed, but the eyes are more extremely affected. They are of a pale yellowish, uneven color, and the ommatidia are fused together, or absent, so that the surface of the eye has a waxy appearance. The eyes are con- siderably reduced in size and are narrowed, leaving a white zone much broader than usual around the margin. In the eye itself on the posterior side there is often a white or cream-colored patch resembling a vesicle. Wax, like glazed, appears in both sexes and has sterile females. Origin.— {Y 1095.) Three males were found in a stock bottle carrying fused. Comparison.— In appearance wax and glazed both resemble the sex-linked char- acter "lozenge" in D. melanogaster. The eye of lozenge more nearly approaches 20 Linkage Group I. glazed in structure, but it is more like wax in shape, and has a bushy appearance, due to heavy black hairs or clusters of hairs on the surface. Lozenge females appear to be partly sterile, but do not show such a high degree of sterility as do those of glazed and wax. An allelomorph of lozenge — lozenge-2 — bears a close resemblance to wax in appearance, and probably had sterile females, according to information Fig. 5.— Cut. Droop (d). (Figure G.) furnished us by Dr. Sturtevant and Dr. Bridges. The stock of lozenge-2 has been lost, however, and we have not been able to compare specimens with those of wax. Description. — The wings of droop flies curve downward or droop at the ends. The character usually appears in both wings, but sometimes appears only in one or fails to appear at all. Fig. 6. — Droop. (Legs are normal, not short, as indicated.) Origin. — (E 780.) 14 droop males were obtained from a pair mating of scaly flies, indicating that the mother was heterozygous for droop. Comparison. — In appearance droop resembles the sex-linked character "depressed" in D. melanogaster (Morgan and Bridges, 1916, p. 67), but differs from the latter in being inconstant. Linkage Data. 21 LINKAGE IN GROUP I, AND CONSTRUCTION OF X-CHROMOSOME MAP. (Figure 7.) In a previous paper (Metz, 1918) the linkage of the 8 characters yellow, frayed, vesiculated, hairy, magenta, forked, rugose, and glazed was considered, and a "chromosome map" constructed with the genes placed in the order given. Two of the genes were ' ' located ' ' only provisionally — frayed because the stock was lost, and hairy because of insufficient data. The position of frayed (with reference to yellow) remains uncertain; but that of hairy is now known to be to the "left" (i. e., above) instead of to the right of magenta (Wein- stein, 1920, and present data). Weinstein (1. c.) has "located" the gene for the character crossveinless at 17.6, or about 2 units to the left of vesiculated. In the present paper the genes for the new characters are "located" with reference to those already known, and additional data are given on several of the latter. Unless otherwise specified the new data in the tables include only the male offspring from the various matings. In this connection we would emphasize the fact that we have made no attempt to carry out a detailed and exhaustive study of linkage, even in the sex-linked group of characters. This would represent a separate study, aside from the purpose of the present work, and one which can be carried out much better after more mutant characters are obtained. It will be noted, therefore, that numerous experiments which would be of value for a critical study have not yet been made. Since chromosome "maps" are now usually placed vertically, instead of horizontally, on the page, the terms "above" and "below" are here used in place of "left" and "right," respectively. The data from linkage experiments on sex-linked characters are given in full on pages 78 to 88 (experiments 1 to 53) and are summar- ized in table 2. These are arranged according to the number of genes concerned and the order of the loci on the chromosome map, beginning with the "zero end." Thus the first experiments are those involving 2 pairs of genes, then those involving 3 pairs, and so on; and in each series the uppermost loci are considered first. The summary in table 2 includes the calculated cross-over percentages for successive regions in each experiment. The present section deals separately with the linkage data on each successive gene, and indicates the method and data used in "locating" the genes and constructing the map. The data are included, in summary form, in table 3, although not all of the data in this table are used in constructing the map. For the latter purpose, an effort has been made to use the experiments considered most reliable, and particularly those involving adjacent loci. By 22 Linkage Group I. consulting tables 2 and 3 in connection with the following consider- ations, the data on each locus may be evaluated as they are taken up for treatment. Table 3 gives the data for each gene in the order of treatment, together with the experiment number and the number of flies involved. The latter indicates the relative value of the experi- ments in respect to numbers, and the experiment number permits reference to table 2, which indicates the number of genes involved in the experiment and other details that aid in evaluating it. Sepia. In previous papers yellow has been placed at the zero-point on the map; but sepia, as shown by experiment 19 (table 2) occupies a position "above" that of yellow, and thus becomes the terminal gene. Sepia and yellow give approximately 5.6 per cent crossing-over, placing yellow at about 6. Yellow. Yellow is one of the most frequently used characters, and its locus has served as a base in numerous experiments, as shoAVTi by table 3. Its relation to sepia has been considered under sepia (experiment 19). This placed yellow at 5.6 units from sepia. With crossveinless it averaged 18.7 per cent crossing-over, with vermilion 19.6 per cent and with vesiculated 18.8 per cent. All of the latter three values should be increased slightly by correction for double crossing-over. Frayed. Frayed was only used in three experiments before the stock was accidentally lost. One of these (experiment 2) was with forked. It gave almost 48 per cent of crossing- over, showing that the frayed locus is remote from that of forked. Another was with yellow (experiment 1, Metz, 1918) and indicated very close linkage (1.3 per cent crossing-over). The third was with vesiculated and magenta (experiment 14, Metz, 1918) and indicated a locus about 18 units to the left of vesiculated. On the basis of these, frayed is tentatively placed 1 unit below yellow. That it is close to yellow is clear, but it is possible that the position should be above rather than below that of yellow. Crossveinless. Weinstein (1920) has placed crossveinless at 17.6 units to the right of (or below) yellow. Our data, summarized in table 3, give a value of 19.6 units for this "region," based on 3,093 flies, without correction for double crossing-over. The value of 18.7 per cent used for calculating map length is based on the combined data (5,450 flies). By adding this 18.7 per cent to the 5.6 per cent given by sepia and yellow, the value 24.3 per cent is obtained. Expressed in round numbers, this gives crossveinless a locus at 24 on the map. Vermilion. Preliminary tests indicated that vermilion was very closely linked to crossveinless, and experiments 20, 36, and 46, involving yellow, crossveinless, and vermilion, placed vermilion slightly below crossveinless. The average of all data (table 3) gives a cross-over value of about 0.47 per cent between the two. This would place vermilion between crossveinless and vesiculated, although the sum of our crossveinless-ver- milion and vermilion-vesiculated values does not agree very closely with the cross- veinless-vesiculated value (1.2 per cent) obtained by Weinstein (1920). Our tests of vermilion with vesiculated (table 3) give a value of approximately 2 units. The exact value depends upon how the data are treated. If all the flies are counted the result is 2 per cent. But since vesiculated occasionally fails to appear Linkage Data. 23 (i. e., overlaps normal), this value is probably not accurate. When only vesiculated flies are considered the value becomes 1.7 per cent. In either case this value, plus the crossveinless-vermilion value of 0.47 unit, con- siderably exceeds the crossveinless-vesiculated value of 1.2 units obtained by Wcin- stein, which suggests that the above sequence of loci may be incorrect. To test this possibility an experiment involving all three genes (crossveinless, vermilion, and vesiculated) together was carried out. Vesiculated. The results of this experiment (see last paragraph) make it practically certain that the sequence is as given above, i. e., crossveinless-vermilion-vesiculated (see experiment 36, p. 81). The conclusion is warranted in spite of the fact that two of the cross-over classes contain only one fly each, for one of these is critical. It is the one in the crossveinless-vermilion-vesiculated class. The presence of this fly rule* out the order vermilion-crossveinless-vesiculated because it would involve a double cross-over within a "distance" of less than 3 units. Likewise the order crossveinless- vesiculated-vermilion is ruled out by the large number of vermilion flies and of yellow- cross veinless- vesiculated flies, which would also require double cross-overs in this short region. The proper order, therefore, appears to be crossveinless, vermilion, vesiculated, unless an error was made in classification, which seems very unlikely. The map locus of vesiculated is calculated by using that of crossveinless as a base and adding the crossveinless-vermilion and vermilion-vesiculated values. These are, respectivelj'^, 0.5, and 1.7, giving a total of 2.2, of a map locus of 26. Singed. Singed has been tested with vermilion, crossveinless, and yellow in the one direc- tion, and with magenta, forked, triangle, and others in the opposite direction (table 3). Experiment 21, involving yellow, crossveinless, and singed, gives singed a position about 17 units below crossveinless and makes clear the order of the genes. This is verified by experiments 25 and 41, involving yellow, singed, and short in the one case, and vermilion, singed, magenta, and forked in the other. The best available data for locating singed are provided by experiments involving vermilion or cross- veinless on the one side (experiments 6, 21, 34, 41, 48) and magenta forked on the other (experiments 41, 45, 48). The crossveinless-singed value is 15.7, and the vermilion-singed value is 17.9. The former value is probably too low, due to the inclusion of experiment 48, which appears to give low values in the upper part of the map (i. e., the sepia-crossveinless value is only 18.7, and the crossveinless-singed value only 14). On this account, and also because the vermilion-singed value is based on a larger count, the latter is used in constructing the map. It places singed at 43.0. Tests with magenta and forked are considered in the discussion of the latter characters. Oblique. Oblique was obtained too late, to permit of the data on its linkage relatioca being included in the tables of summaries, hence they will be considered fully here. The approximate location of oblique on the chromosome map was determined by means of two small experiments involving, respectively, magenta, forked, oblique, and short (experiment 49) and sepia, crossveinless, oblique, and short (experiment 50). In the latter only the not-oblique flies are used in the calculation, because oblique interferes with the classification of both sepia and crossveinless. The values obtained in these two experiments indicated that oblique was between crossveinless and forked, so matings were made to test its Hnkage T\ith singed, which has a locus intermediate between these two. The results of the tests with singed are given in experiments 51, 52, and 53. The first of these shows that oblique falls very close to singed (2 cross- 24 Linkage Group I. overs in 48 flies), and the other two agree in giving it a position approximately 6 units above that of singed. In both of the latter a difficulty in classification arises through the presence of oblique and sepia together. This necessitates omitting the oblique flies from the calculation or else apportioning them between the oblique and the oblique sepia classes. Both methods are used, and the results are in such close agreement as to cause no difficulty in estimating the approximate values. The map location of oblique has been calculated from the average of the three experiments just considered. When only the not-oblique flies are used (in the last two cases) the result is 11 cross-overs in 186 flies, or a value of 5.9 per cent. When all flies arc used the result is 15 cross-overs in 263 flies, or a value of 5.7 per cent; 6 per cent is therefore used as the approximate value in constructing the map, and oblique is placed 6 units above singed. It should be noted, however, that in both of the experiments involving sepia, the sepia-singed value is unusually low, ranging around 19 instead of about 40, as it should. The singed-short value, on the other hand, agrees approximately with expectation. This suggests that in these experi- ments a factor was present which reduced crossing-over in the "upper end" of the chromosome. If so, the locus of oblique may be placed too close to that of singed. Hairy. Hairy has been used very little in Unkage tests because of its unsatisfactory nature. In a test with forked (Metz, 1918) it gave about 3 per cent crossing-over, Weinstein (1920) found it to be at the "left" of (above) magenta, and obtained a cross-over value of 5.4 per cent with magenta. Our experiments 26, 28, 29, 37, and 42 indicate the same sequence of genes and give very nearly the same cross-over value \vith magenta (5 per cent). The combined data give a value of 5.3 per cent, placing it at about 62 of the map. Magenta and Forked. Since magenta and forked have been used in combination almost exclusively, they may be considered together. They were among the first sex-linked characters obtained and have been used extensively ever since. The order of their genes with reference to the other principal loci is indicated by previously published data and by experiments 27, 29, 30, 31, 37, and 40 to 48. The cross-over value of the magenta- forked region is the best known one in D. virilis. The data of Metz (1918) give a value of 3.7 units, based on 2,529 flies and those of Weinstein (1920) give a value of 4 per cent based on 1,642 flies. Data in the present paper (table 3) give 3.4 units, based on 6,208 flies. Combined these give a value of 3.6 units, which is used in constructing the present map. Magenta and forked are located with reference to singed by using the singed- magenta value of 25.1 units given by experiments 41, 45, and 48 (table 3). This places magenta at about 67 and forked at about 71 units from the zero end of the map. These loci should be placed more accurately by obtaining large numbers in an experiment involving vermilion (or crossveinlcss), singed, magenta, and forked simultaneously. Our experiments 41 and 48 are of this nature, but the counts only include 718 flies. Triangle and Short. Triangle is shown by experiments 13 and 32 to be closely linked to short. The latter character appeared later, chronologically, than triangle, but is much better for linkage studies and consequently is used more than triangle. The average cross-over value between the two (table 3) is 5.1 per cent. Experiment 32 shows that the position of short is between that of triangle and droop, and experiment 33 shows that it is above rugose. In locating triangle and short on the map, four different lines of evidence have been considered, as summarized on the following page. Linkage Data. 25 I. II. III. IV. f f-T T T-8 B B-r r r-d d 71.1 10.7 (269) f f-r r 8-r 8 T-8 T 71.1 26.3 (3.727) si 42.4 8i-8 42.9(1.442) f 71.1 f-8 18.5 (677) 81.8 6.1 (607) 97.4 16.9 86.9 15.9 (1,664) a 85.3 T-8 5 1 8 89.6 T-8 5.1 81.5 5.1 102.8 7.2 (470) T 80.2 B 85.3 B-r 15.9 T 84.6 76.4 110 r 101.2 By adding the successive values from forked (i. e., f-T+T-s), triangle comes at 81.8 and short at 86.9. Neither of these is based on large numbers, however, and consequently they are open to question. The second method involves the use of the singed-short value, which is based on 1,442 flies. This would place short at 85.3, which differs by less than 2 units from the other value. By working back from this, triangle would be placed at 80.2. In contrast to these two lines of evidence, which give essentially the same results, the other two deviate considerably, and in opposite directions. The first is based on the forked-short value as given by experiments 45 and 48 (577 flies). These experiments are particularly significant, because both involve singed, magenta, forked, and short simultaneously. According to these, the forked-short distance is 18.5, placing short at 89.6, or 3 units beyond the more extreme of the two values given above. The fourth method considered is that of using the forked-rugose value to locate rugose (at 97.4) and then working backward to locate short and triangle. This places short at 81.5 and triangle at 76.4, about 4 units less than the least extreme value given above. Since the forked-rugose value, upon which these depend, is prob- ably too short by about this amount, due to undetected double crossing-over, it seems probable that the first two methods give approximately correct results. They also represent roughly the average of the other values, and hence they are used in con- structing the map. Triangle is thus placed at 81 (intermediate between 80.2 and 81.8) and short at 86 (intermediate between 85.3 and 86.9). Cut. As noted above, cut appeared in a culture carrying short, and has behaved like an allelomorph of short. The original female, heterozygous for cut, and either hete- rozygous or homozygous for short, gave 23 cut and 26 short sons, wth no wild-type or cut short sons. The daughters were all wild-type. Nine of these were tested individually and proved to be of two types; 4 of them gave short sons and sons with normal wings, but no cut, and 5 of them gave cut sons and sons with normal wings, but no short (M 182, 197, 204, 206-209, 232, 234). Females heterozygous for cut and carrying short in the opposite X-chromosome have been used in keeping the stock of cut, and their sons have thus far been of the two types short and cut. D. H. HILL LIBRARY KI^Np-fk* I •r>t-/^lir« r» vfaffa I nWe^ne^ 26 Linkage Group I. Rugose, Glazed, and Wax. Since rugose is the best of these three allelomorphs for use in linkage experiments, the present data are nearly all based on this character. These are summarized under experiments 9, 14, 16, 18, 33, 35, 38, 39, 43, 44, and 47. The locus of rugose is placed on the map on the basis of the short-rugose value of 15.9, which gives rugose a position at 102, based on 1,564 flies. This is about 4 units beyond the position given by using the forked-rugose value, but is believed to be more accurate than the latter, since it eliminates most of the undetected double cross-overs. Droop. Droop has been used in experiments with singed, magenta, forked, triangle, short, and rugose (table 3). These agree in indicating that its locus is in the lower part of the map, and experiments 32 and 33 show that it falls beyond rugose, which has previously marked the extreme end of the map. Its position is determined with reference to rugose by experiments 18 and 33, which place it 7.2 units from rugose, or at approximately 109. Linkage Data. 27 Table 2. — Summary of linkage experiments on sex-linked characters. Experi- ment No. Genes involved. Cross-over percentage. Total flies. 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 se-v fd-f y-c y-v v-vs V-V8 v-si V-8 v-T v-r« si-T si-B ei-d si-d T-8 T-r T-d e-r e-d 6-d r-d r-d se-y-c y-c-v y-c-si y-c-8 y-c-d y-v-s y-si-8 y-ha-m v-m-f vs-ha-m ha-m-f m-f-T m-f-d T-s-d 8-r-d se-c-si-s se-c-s-r y-c-v-vs y-ha-m-f y-vs-f-r y-vs-f-r* c-v-m-f v-si-m-f vs-ha-m-f v8-m-f-r si-m-f-s y-c-v-m-f y-vs-m-f-r Be-c-si-m-f-8 se-v fd-f y-c y-v V-V8 v-va v-si v-8 V-T v-r« si-T si-s si-d si-d T-s T-r T-d s-r B-d B-d r-d r-d se-y y-c y-c y-c y-c y-v y-si y-ha v-m v8-ha vs-ha ha-m m-f m-f T-s s-r se-c se-c y-c y-ha y-vs y-vs y-vs y-vs c-v v-si vs-ha vs-ha vs-m vs-m si-m y-c y-vs y-vs se-c 23.5. 47.6. 21.2. 20.6. 2.4, 1.9. 18.6. 43.2. 38.9. 42.5. 39.7. 39.2. 46.2, 41.3. 5.5. 8.9. 23.6, 18.2. 28.0 14.3 13.2 7.5 5.6 20.3 17.0 17.5 20.2 14.2 34.1 41.3 31.5 39.6 41.8 3.6 0.7 2.5 4.8 13.2 21.9 20.0 20.7 48.8 21.1 7.1 17.9 18.3 0.4 16.3 30.9 19.8 33.7 32.8 28.6 18.3 20.8 21.2 18.7 counting all flies counting only vs flies. counting all flies. . . . counting only d flies. counting only d flies. counting all flies counting only d flies counting all flies counting only d flies y-c 20. 8 c-v 0.4 c-si 16.8 c-8 44 . 5 c-d39.2 V-S37.3 si-s 33. 5 ha-m 4.8 m-f 3.6 ha-m 3.3, counting all flies. counting only vs flies m-f 1.8 f-T 10.7. f-T 3 . 7, counting only T flies . f-d 38.5, counting all flies, f-d 25.0, counting only d flies, s-d 20.6. r-d 21 .3, counting all flies r-d 6 . 7, counting only d flies c-si 17 . 7. si-s 39 . 0 c-s 44.2. s-r 14.8 c-v 0 . 5. v-vs 1 . 0, counting all flics v-vs 1.1, counting only vs flies ha-m 5.4, m-f 4.9 vs-f 40. 1, f-r 28.8. counting all flies vs-f 47. 1, counting only vs flies vs-f 32.4, f-rK 35.5, counting all flics vs-f 45.9, counting only vs flies v-m 36.9, m-f 1.9 si-m 19 . 2, m-f 5.1 ha-m 6.9, m-f 2.3, counting all flies counting only vs flies m-f 5.2, f-r 26.0, counting all flies counting only vs flies m-f 4.1, f-s 19.8 c-v 0.6, v-m 35 0, m-f 2.0 vs-m 31.6, m-f 4.7, f-r 27.2, counting all flies. vs-m 43.2, counting only vs flies c-si 14.0, si-m 28.0, m-f 3.2. f-s 17.9 645 254 406 432 967 472 802 1653 167 200 136 651 80 29 292 168 72 730 196 56 688 306 648 472 417 137 79 225 173 63 165 121 55 166 269 135 161 64 315 409 164 141 425 395 176 223 142 70 478 207 1411 312 217 96 1708 830 171 639 360 141 408 28 Linkage Group I. Table 3. — Summary of linkage data on sex-linked genes arranged according to map order. Region. Experiment No.' Total flies. 1 Cross- overs. Average per cent. se-y y-fd y-o y-v y-v8 fd-ve 19 548 31 5.6 1.3 18.7 19.6 18.8 18.5 1 (Metz, 1918)... 1,2,3 (Weinstein, 1920) 3 308 4 2,357 415 406 86 114 96 71 24 16 82 117 19 548 20 472 21 417 22 137 23 79 36 395 46 639 Total Grand total . . 4 3,093 606 5,450 1,021 432 89 98 32 84 121 20 472 24 225 36 395 46 639 Total 2 (Metz, 1918).. . 6 (Metz, 1918)... 7 (Metz, 1918)... 9 (Metz, 1918)... 16 (Metz, 1918)... 17 (Metz, 1918)... 18 (Metz. 1918)... 19 (Metz, 1918)... 1, 4, (Weinstein, 1920) Total 36 2,163 424 151 35 41 32 92 183 47 120 71 495 187 187 579 1,086 298 699 361 2,473 6,021 1,116 88 (36) 30 (5) 86 (38) 75 (30) 279 395, counting all flies 38 (176, counting only vs flies). 142, counting all flies 39 (70, counting only vs flies) . 478, counting all flies . . . 47 (207, counting only vs flies) . 360. countine all flies Total Grand total.. 14 (Metz, 1918)... (141, counting only vs flies). 1 ,375, counting all flies 7 , 396, counting all flies 1,395 296 55 ' Except where otherwise specified the experiment numbers refer to experiments in the present paper. Linkage Data. 29 Table 3. — Summary of linkage data on sex-linked genes arranged according to map order — Continued. Region. Experiment No, Total flies. Cross- overs. Average per cent. c-v C-V8 v-vs c-si v-si si-m ei-f si-T si-s vs-m 20 472 2 2 6 4 0.47 1.2 1.7 16.7 17.9 25.1 29.1 39.7 42.9 36 395 40 1,411 46 639 Total 1 (Weinstein, 1920) 36 2,917 14 1 , 560 18 6 (3) 24 395, counting all flies Grand total . . 6 (176, counting only vs flies). 1 ,955, counting all flies (967, counting all flies) 472, counting only va flies (23) 9 (4) 2 36 (395, counting all flies) 176, counting only ve flies Total 21 648, counting only vs flies 11 417 70 25 57 34 141 48 406 Total 6 964 152 802 149 51 41 312 Total 41 1,114 200 312 60 49 114 45 171 48 406 Total 41 889 223 312 76 56 127 45 171 48 406 Total 10 889 259 136 54 11 551 216 68 66 . . 90 25 173 34 141 45 171 48 406 200 Total 3 (Metz, 1918)... 7 (Metz, 1918). . . 11 (Metz, 1918).. . 12 (Metz, 1918).. . 14 (Metz, 1918). . . 16 (Metz, 1918)... 19 (Metz, 1918)... Total 1,442 619 263 85 57 138 190 106 368 107 187 463 504 296 1 , 086 361 3,160 1.051 30 Linkage Group I. Table 3. — Summary of linkage data on sex-linked genes arranged according to map order — Continued. Region. Experiment No. Total flies. Cross- overs. Average per cent. ha-m m-f f-T 28 121, counting all flies 52 (24) 82 (21) 576 (275) 114 (61) 824 33.6 5.3 3.8 10.7 42 (55, counting only vs flies) . 217, counting all flies . . . 43\ (96, counting only vs flies) . 1,708, counting all flies. 44 1 (830, counting only vs flies) . 360, counting all flies 47 Total Grand total . . 3, 4, 5 (Weinstein, 1920) 26 (141, counting only vs flies). 2 , 406, counting all flies 5,566 1,875 1,388 76 63 3 4 6 12 15 28 121 29 166 37 223 42 217 Total Grand total. . 3 (Metz, 1918)... 5 (Metz, 1918)... 12 (Metz, 1918)... 16 (Metz, 1918) . . . 2, 4 (Weinstein, 1920) Total 27 790 40 2,178 116 262 13 17 23 42 66 677 504 1,086 1,642 4,171 161 165 6 29 166 3 2 4 11 28 16 5 89 7 13 17 13 30 269 31 161 37 223 40 1,411 41 312 42 217 431 1,708 44/ 45 171 46 639 47 360 48 406 Total Grand total. . 30 6,208 214 10,379 375 269, counting all flies 29 (5) (135, counting only T flies). Linkage Data. 31 Table 3. — Summary oj linkage data on sex-linked genes arranged according to map order — Continued. Region. Experiment No. Total flies. Cross- overs. Average per cent. f-8 f-r f-d T-8 T-r T-d 3-r 8-d r-d 46 171 406 34 73 18.5 26.3 25.0 6.1 8.9 25.7 15.9 17.7 7.2 48 Total 4 (Metz, 1918) . . . 13 (Metz, 1918) . . . 18 (Metz, 1918) . . . 2 (Weinstein, 1920) Total 38 577 107 286 81 47 193 74 173 699 359 1,517 395 142 41 445 98 431 1,708 44/ 47 360 Total Grand total. . 31 2,210 684 3,727 979 (161, counting all flies) 64, counting only d fliea (62) 16 16 15 13 292 32 315 Total 14 607 31 168 15 15 72, counting only d flies 17 (80) 42 32 (315, counting all flies) 157, counting only d flies Total 16 229, counting only d fliea 59 730 133 54 63 33 409 35 425 Total 17 1 , 564 250 (55) 8 (65) 33 (141) 26 (196, counting all flies) 66, counting only d flies 32 (315, counting all flies) 157, counting only d flies 33 (409, counting all flies) 164, counting only d flies Total 18 377, counting only d flies 67 306, counting only d flies 23 11 33 164, counting only d flies Total 470, counting only d flies 34 32 Linkage Group II. III. LINKAGE GROUP II. Since confluent was the first non-sex-linked character found in D. virilis, the group to which it belongs is designated Group II. It consists of the four characters confluent, concave, double, and broken. The first two are excellent characters and have been used extensively; the third is very poor for linkage work and has been used relatively little; while the last, although a good character, appeared so recently that it has been possible to use it only in preliminary experiments. DESCRIPTION, ORIGIN, AND COMPARISON OF CHARACTERS IN GROUP II. Confluent (C). (Plate 3, Figure 1.) Description. — Confluent derives its name from the fact that the second vein is con- fluent with the costal vein for a short distance near the tip of the latter, as showTi in the figure (also Metz, 1916, fig. 2). The fly appears to be unaffected otherwise, save for a thickening of the outer ends of the two cross-veins, and a slight roughening of the eyes in most cases. Confluent resembles the extreme form of the sex-linked character triangle, and like the latter is dominant. Unlike triangle, however, it is lethal in the homozygous condition and pure stock can not be obtained. In combi- nation with the other dominant wing characters, branched, net, and extra, confluent is exaggerated, the confluence of the second and costal veins being more extended. It is likewise exaggerated by capsule, as noted under the description of the latter. Origin. — Confluent was one of the first characters found in D. virilis (see Metz, 1916, p. 593). Comparison. — Confluent resembles the "confluent" of D. melanogaster in appear- ance and in being a dominant. It is probable that they agree also in being lethal when homozygous (see Metz, 1916, p. 591, and Morgan, Bridges, and Sturtevant, 1919, p. 257). Concave (cc). (Plate 3, Figures 3 to 7.) Description. — The principal diagnostic characters of concave are the curled, instead of straight, hairs on the arista (fig. 4, plate 3), and the heavy, somewhat wa\y bristles on the scutellum. The former is constant and definite and the latter is usually evident. In addition the scutellar bristles frequently stand erect or point in various directions, the dorso-central bristles sometimes are similarly affected, the posterior scutellar bristles extend nearly parallel instead of crossing, and often the wings are abnormal. The latter effect is very irregular. Sometimes both wings are very small, or narrow, or short and nearly circular (a common type), or concave instead of convex on the inner margin. Often only one wing is affected, or the two may be differently affected. Two typical wing forms are shown in an earlier paper (Metz, 1916, figs. 5 and 6). Origin. — The origin of concave is given in the paper just cited. Comparison. — Concave is paralleled very closely by the third chromosome re- cessive character "crumpled" in D. melanogaster. Both have the curled hairs on the arista, and the same type of abnormal scutellar bristles and both exhibit a series of wing modifications, of which the most frequent types are similar in the two species. Double (de). Description. — Double is characterized by an occasional doubling of part of the fourth vein or fifth vein, especially near the posterior cross-vein, by the presence of a tubercle on the first vein in some individuals, and frequently by a broadening and Description of Characters. 33 arching of the wing as well as by the angular position in which the wing is held out from the body. None of these characters is constant, and for this reason considerable difficulty is experienced in classifying the flies. Owing to this and to the fact that double flies have very poor viability, the stock has been discarded. Origin. — (V 1169.) Double first appeared in a pair mating, both parents evi- dently having been heterozygous; the offspring were 57 double (28 9 9:29cfcr), and 190 not double (89 9 9 : 101 cf d^). Table 4. — Chronological list of autosomal characters in Drosophila virilia. Character. Sym- bol. Parts affected. Link- age group First observed. Found by- Record. Confluent. . . . Concave Steel Acute Branched Fused Telescoped . . . Scaly Double Hump Minus Capsule Hunch Pinched Interrupted . . . Approximated, Net Spine Spread Broken Garnet Extra Ruffled C CO St ac B fu t S de hp mi cp h P i a Nt en sp b G E ru Wing veins . . II Bristles and wmgs II Eyes III Wings IV Wing veins . . V Wing veins . . V Thorax III Eyes III Wing veins . . II Thorax IV Bristles ? Wings ? Thorax iii Wing veins . . IV Wing vein . . . V Wing vein . . . V Wing veins and bristles ? Wing vein . . . ? Wings iii Wing vein. . . II Eye color. . . . III Wing vein. . . ? Thoracic hairs and bristles. . . . V July. 1914 Sept., 1915 Feb., 1916 Do Sept., 1916 Nov., 1916 Feb., 1917 July, 1917 Do Mar., 1919 Do Apr., 1919 May, 1919 June, 1919 Sept., 1919 Do Do June, 1920 Mar., 1921 May, 1922 Do June, 1922 Do Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Metz Mason Mason Metz M. Demerec Moses Moses Metz Metz Metz Metz, 1916, p. 693 Metz, 1916, Metz, 1916, c stock. V 601. 606. V 778. V974. V 1128. V 1169. Hyde stock. L 22. L92. L 176. L252. E 15. E 15. L462. P stock. P 577. M 66. M 13. M 21. M 113. 597, 698, Broken (b). (Plate 3, Figures 8 and 9.) Description. — The character takes its name from the break in the cross-veins. The posterior cross-veins are usually lacking, but may be broken, or, in rare cases, one may be intact but thin in the middle. The anterior cross-veins are sometimes absent or broken, but not constantly so. Frequently, the distal end of the third and fourth veins is thin, and occasionally these veins fail to reach the wing-margin. In addition to the effects on the veins, a characteristic soft, wavy, and glossy appear- ance of the wing as a whole may usually be noticed. In most of the flies the posterior cross-veins are entirely gone, as they are in crossveinless flies. When this is not the case, the end of the vein nearest the fourth vein is usually gone, resulting in a con- dition almost indistinguishable from that found in interrupted flies (fifth chromo- some). The frequency of these types may be judged roughly from the following count of 50 flies taken from a stock bottle: in 46 specimens both posterior cross-veins were entirely gone, in 3 both posterior cross-veins were broken (end next to fourth vein gone), and in 1 one posterior cross- vein was gone while the other was intact, but thin in the middle. 34 Linkage Group II. In addition to modifying the wings, broken also affects the legs. The tibia on the hind leg is strongly cur^•ed, or arched, with the concave side next to the femur, and frequently the tarsi are shorter and swollen. Origin. — (M 66.) Broken appeared in acute stock. Only one broken fly was observed, but others may have appeared. Comparison. — Superficially broken resembles the sex-linked character "crossvein- less" in D. virilis and D. melanogaster (as noted above), and also a non-sex-linked character in obscura, the stock of which has been lost (unpublished data of D. E. Lancefield). It is not known how close the resemblance is in the latter case. LINKAGE DATA. Detection of Linkage in Group II. Confluent and concave. — Four back-cross matings (V 675, 730, 740, 741) of males heterozygous for confluent and concave (in opposite chromosomes) to homozygous concave females gave the following counts: confluent 213, concave 213, confluent concave 0, wild-type 0. A similar back-cross (V 752) using a male heterozygous for confluent and concave, but this time in the same chromosome, gave : confluent 0, concave 0, confluent concave 46, wild-type 44. These experiments show that confluent and concave are linked. Double with concave and confiuent. — Double has proved to be such an unsatisfactory character to work with, on account of its tendency to grade into normal, and its eff"ect on viability, that only a few tests were made for linkage before the stock was discarded. These are summarized below. Linkage between double and concave was indicated by the F2 count from a cross of concave by double. This consisted of 118 wild-type, 33 concave, 33 double, without any con- cave doubles (P 19, 30, 31). Similarly, linkage between double and confluent was indicated by the progeny of matings (E 998, E 1001) between confluent and double, using double females and males heterozygous for confluent (dominant) and double. These gave: confluent 142, double 113, wild-type 0, confluent double 0. The 5 wild-type flies in the latter case are assumed to be genetically double. Confluent and broken. — Linkage between these two characters was shown by the usual back-cross test, using heterozygous males. Two such matings (M 291, M 292) gave: 23 confluent, 27 broken, and no wild-type or confluent broken flies. Cross-over Values in Group II. Confluent and concave. — Two back-cross matings (experiment 54) , using females heterozygous for the two genes in opposite chro- mosomes, gave 123 non-cross-over flies, and 90 cross-overs. This gives a cross-over value of approximately 42 per cent, without any correction for double crossing-over. Confluent and double. — Six back-crosses (E 931, E 947, E 948, E 1032, E 1033, E 1034), using heterozygous females from confluent Linkage Data. 35 by double, gave: confluent 343, double 113, confluent double 83, wild-type 435. Counting only the double flies (to avoid errors due to viability and to inability to exclude all double flies from the other two classes), this gives a cross-over value of 42 per cent, which is reliable at least to the extent of showing that confluent and double are not closely linked. No attempt was made to determine the amount of crossing-over between double and concave, because of the difficulty of distinguishing the two characters. ConUuent and broken. — Two back-crosses of heterozygous females (experiment 55) gave 139 non-cross-over flies and 93 cross-overs, from which we obtain a cross-over value of 40 per cent, showing very loose linkage. CONSTRUCTION OF SECOND-CHROMOSOME MAP. (Figure^?). Unfortunately, broken appeared so recently that it has only been possible to secure counts from the one type of mating given above; hence broken can not yet be located on the map. Since the '^ position" of double is likewise uncertain, only the genes for confluent and concave can be located. These are probably at least 50 units apart, and perhaps much farther, since double crossing-over would probably prevent the detection of more than about 42 per cent of crossing-over, even if more occurred. 36 Linkage Group III. IV. LINKAGE GROUP III. This group consists of the five characters scaly, spread, hunch, telescoped, and garnet. A sixth character, steel (for description see Metz, 1916d), also belongs in this group, but it proved to be so difficult to classify that the stock was discarded. 0 -- sepia (se) 6 7 24 24.5 26 36 42 102 109 n 0 -- Con-fluerrt (C) yellow (y) frayed (fd) crossveinless (c) vermilion (v) vesiculated (vs) oblicjue (o) Sin6ed (si) rugose, etc. (r) droop (d) 42±-- concave (cc) double (de) broken (b) 62 - - hairy (ha) 67 - - magenta (m) 71 - - forked (f) 81 - - Triangle (T) 86 - - short (s) HE 0 -- Scaly (S) 2i± -- spread ? (sp) 3I± 48 ± hunch (h) telescoped (♦) 9li:-- Garnet (G) Figure 7. Crossover maps of linkage groups I to III in Drosophila virilis. Maps II and III are only in- tended to give approximations of the linkage relations. Double and broken in group II have not yet been located on the map. Description of Characters. 37 DESCRIPTION, ORIGIN, AND COMPARISON OF CHARACTERS IN GROUP III. Scaly (S). Description. — Scaly is a dominant, characterized by flattened, scale-like omma- tidia. The eye usually has a moist appearance also. The expression of this character seems to be influenced by environmental conditions. In some cultures it appears in all flies heterozygous for the gene; in others many such flies have eyes normal in appearance, although breeding tests show them to carry the gene. It is probable that this irregularity applies even to homozygous flies, although we have not tested this point thoroughly. Scaly is not lethal when homozygous and pure stock is easily maintained. IV -acute (ac) 0- -(-Pinched (P) hur V 0-. ip(hp) VI 0--bent{be) Net(Nt) 57 ±-^ fused (fu) interrupted(i) Branched (B) approximated (a) ruffled (ru) Figure 8. Crossover maps of linkage groups IV to VI in Drosophila virilis. The genes are not placed on the map in group V, for reasons given in the text (p. 50). Origin. — (V 1128.) Scaly was first observed among the offspring of 3 females from one stock mated to males from another stock. The mating gave S6 wild-type and 23 scaly individuals, suggesting that one of the parent flies was heterozygous for scaly. Spread (sp). Description. — In spread flies the wings are held out from the body at varying angles, usually between 60° and 90°. Otherwise the flies appear to be normal. Their viability is poor, however, making the character a difficult one to use in linkage experiments. It can not be classified accurately in combination with the third- chromosome character hunch, because in the latter the wings are often held out at an angle also. 38 Linkage Group III. Origin. — (P 577.) One female was found in a bottle of droop stock. Comparison. — Spread resembles the third-chromosome recessive "spread" in D. melanogaster (Dexter, 1914) and also the second-chromosome recessive "spread" in D. simulans (Sturtevant, 19216, p. 186). It differs from the former in that the wings are not uniformly held at an angle of 90°. In this respect it agrees more closely with "spread" of simulans. Hunch (h), (Figure 9.) Description. — Hunch flies lack the usual depression between the mesonotum and scutellum on the dorsal side, giving a hunch-back appearance. They frequently show an exudation on each side of the thorax near the junction of mesonotum and scutellum. The wings are usually soft and "moist" in texture, and sometimes are only partially expanded and are held out at an acute angle from the body. Origin. — (L 176.) Hunch arose from a mating of a single female by two males, all from the same mass culture. The offspring were 35 not-hunch and 12 hunch. Evi- dently the female and at least one of the males were heterozygous for the hunch gene. Comparison. — Hunch agrees in its main characteristics with the third-chromosome recessive "ascute" in D. melanogaster and with two similar characters in D. ohscura, one sex-linked and one non-sex-linked. The latter one we have not seen, owing to the stock having been lost, but Dr. Lancefield informs us that it does not differ noticeably from the other. Fig. 9.— Hunch. Fig. 10. — Telescoped. Telescoped (t). (Figure 10.) Description. — Telescoped is a recessive, characterized bj' a greatly shortened or telescoped thorax and a consequent close approximation of the anterior and posterior pairs of dorso-central bristles. Most telescoped flies also have small, narrow eyes, or in extreme cases no eyes at all, and usually the hairs on the mesonotum are sparse and irregular in distribution, and the anterior dorso-central bristles are small. Origin. — (V 974.) A female found in confluent stock and segregated because she had "groove eyes" was mated to normal-eyed males from the same bottle. Among the offspring was one female \vith very narrow eyes, which, when bred to normal- eyed brothers (or half brothers), gave 225 not-telescoped and 48 telescoped progeny. At first the telescoped flies were distinguished merely by their narrow eyes, and it is probable that among the 225 flies recorded as "not-telescoped" many telescoped were present. Indeed, it is probable that the original female from confluent stock was telescoped and one or more of the males to which she was mated were at least heter- ozygous for telescoped. Comparison. — Dr. Lancefield informs us that the sex-linked character "com- pressed" in D. ohscura resembled telescoped, but unfortunately the stock of com- METZ PLATE 3 10 Autosomal Mutant Characters in Drosophila virii.is. 1, Confluent; 2, Heterozygoiis confluent capsule; 3, and 5 to 7, Different types of wings from concave flies; 4, Wild-type (right) and concave (left) antennir; 8 and 9, Broken; 10, Acute; 11, Pinched. METZ PLATE 4 Autosomal Mutant Characters ix Drosoimiii.a \ ikii.is. 1, Branched; 2, Branched Pinched; 3, Branched Pinched Extra; 4, Fused approxi- mated; 5, Ap;)roxiniated; 6, Interrupted; 7, Interrupted approximated; S, Heterozy- gous interrupted api)roximated. Linkage Data. 39 pressed has been lost and we are unable to make a detailed comparison. The de- scription of telescoped suggests that of the character "furrowed" in D. melanogaster (Morgan and Bridges, 1916). This is not borne out by a detailed comparison, how- ever, for the modifications are not alike in the two cases. Garnet (G). Description. — Garnet is an eye-color character in which the color is very close to Ridgeway's garnet-brown. It is almost indistinguishable from the sex-linked char- acter magenta, but differs in being a dominant. It is uniform and regular in appear- ance, and promises to be a very useful character. Pure stock has not yet been obtained, but from one mating of garnet by garnet (M 101) all of the 51 offspring were garnet, indicating that one parent was probably homozygous. Tests are now under way to determine whether or not garnet is lethal in the homozygous condition. Its viability is excellent. Heterozygous flies outcrossed gave 231 garnet to 240 not-garnet offspring (M 13, 18, 19, 42, 99). Origin. — (M 13.) The origin of the garnet is not definitely known. It was found in a bottle of mixed stock carrying the sex-linked characters vermilion and singed, and supposedly magenta also. Tests revealed the presence of a dominant eye-color resembling magenta, but no actual magenta. How long this character (garnet) had been present is not known. Comparison. — So far as we are aware, this is the only dominant mutant eye-color character of this sort known in any species of Drosophila. LINKAGE DATA. Detection of Linkage in Group III. Scaly and telescoped. — Scaly and telescoped were shown to belong to the same group by back-crossing males heterozygous for the respective genes (in opposite chromosomes) to telescoped females. The following count was obtained (V 1220, 1244, 1252): scaly 116, telescoped 110, wild-type 0, telescoped scaly 0. (See also under scaly, hunch, and telescoped.) Steel and telescoped. — The linkage of these two characters was detected when a heterozygous male was back-crossed to a double recessive female. This mating (V 1191) gave: telescoped 12, steel 13, wild-type 1, telescoped steel 0. The one wild-type fly doubtless belongs in the steel class, but failed to show the spot in the eyes. F2 counts also indicated linkage by the absence of the double recessive class. Hunch and telescoped. — Both F2 and back-cross counts indicate linkage between these characters. Four Fi matings (L 376, 388, 394, 400) gave the following total of F2 individuals: telescoped 67, hunch 74, wild- type 162, telescoped hunch 0. The back-cross data are given in the following paragraph. Scaly, hunch, and telescoped. — Two back-cross matings using heter- ozygous males, with scaly in one chromosome and hunch telescoped in the other, by homozygous hunch telescoped females gave the fol- lowing totals: hunch telescoped 132, scaly 202, wild-type 58, hunch 0, telescoped 0, scaly hunch 0, scaly telescoped 0, scaly hunch tel- 40 Linkage Group III. escoped 0. The 58 wild-type flies here should be in the scaly class but do not show the eye modification. The double-recessive class is small, as usual, on account of low viability. Scaly and garnet. — Linkage between scaly and garnet was shown by the usual back-cross test. This gave (M 289, 311) 42 scaly, 49 garnet, 3 wild-type (probably genetically scaly), and no scaly garnet. Hunch, telescoped, and spread. — The following F2 counts from a mating of hunch telescoped by spread indicate that spread probably belongs in the third linkage group; hunch telescoped 86, spread 110, wild-type 227, hunch 9, telescoped 22, hunch telescoped spread (4?), hunch spread 0, telescoped spread 0. The four doubtful hunch telescoped flies had wings slightly spread, but this condition is occa- sionally found in hunch telescoped flies, and the present cases are probably due to hunch. Tests of spread with members of groups II and IV show no linkage, and the same is probably true in the case of group V, although the data are not conclusive as yet. Cross-over Values in Group III. Scaly and hunch. — Two back-crosses using heterozygous females gave 35 cross-over flies and 99 non-cross-overs (experiment 57). The wild-type and hunch classes are probably enlarged at the expense of the other two through the occasional failure of scaly to manifest itself, but the error due to this is probably not as great as that due to viability. As they stand, the data indicate approximately 26 per cent crossing-over. Scaly and telescoped. — Two back-crosses (experiment 58), using heterozygous females by telescoped males, gave 237 cross-overs to 313 non-cross-overs. These counts, like those in the preceding case, are subject to some error due to viability and possibly to errors in classifying scaly flies, but they leave no doubt that the cross-over value is high (43 per cent here). Scaly and spread. — Spread has only been tested with scaly and with garnet, and hence its locus is not yet accurately placed. Five back-crosses of females heterozygous for scaly and spread are sum- marized under experiment 56. These give a cross-over value of approximately 21 per cent (counting only scaly flies). This is subject to considerable error, but the value is sm.aller than that given by any of the other three characters when used with scaly and indicates that the locus of spread is probably between scaly and hunch, or else above scaly. Scaly, hunch, telescoped. — Under experiment 60 are given the results of 8 back-crosses of heterozygous females with hunch and telescoped in one chromosome and scaly in the other. The cross-over values here are approximately 41 units between scaly and hunch and 19 units between scaly and telescoped. These values are only approxi- Linkage Data. 41 mate, but they are probably reliable to the extent of indicating that the serial order of the genes is scaly-hunch-telescoped and in showing that hunch and telescoped are more closely linked than are scaly and hunch. The former value is probably reasonably accurate. Scaly, hunch, telescoped, and garnet. — The relative "location" of garnet was determined by a back-cross involving garnet on one side and scaly hunch telescoped on the other. This is summarized in experiment 61. It gives garnet a position on the opposite end of the map from scaly. The numbers are not large enough to give accurate cross-over data, but they support the preceding experiment in indicating that the loci of hunch and telescoped are relatively close together, while that of scaly is remote from both. That of garnet is likewise remote, but in the opposite direction. As indicated by the table, two sets of values may be considered, one based on the total count and the other on only the flies showing scaly. In either case the telescoped-garnet value is so large as to indicate that these two loci are probably 50 or more units apart. As a result of the remoteness of scaly and garnet from the other two loci, double crossing-over is high. In fact the single cross-overs in region 2 are not as numerous as either type of doubles involving this region. Even the triples appear to exceed this class of singles, but this is probably due in part to the failure of scaly to appear in some of the flies classified as hunch. Taken at their face value, the data suggest that hunch and telescoped may be in the reverse order from that given. This should be kept in mind as a possibility, although it is opposed by the more extensive data from experiment GO, which are the ones used here for the tentative determination of serial order. Spread and garnet. — Two back-crosses involving these two genes (in opposite chromosomes) gave 59 cross-over flies and 82 non-cross- overs. This gives a cross-over value of 41.8 per cent (experiment 59), indicating that spread is remote from garnet, thus agreeing with the experiment involving scaly and spread, which placed spread near the zero end of the map. CONSTRUCTION OF THE THIRD-CHROMOSOIVIE MAP. (Figure 7.) The data available for constructing a map of the third chromosome are given in tables 5 and 6. For reasons given above, only a rough map can be constructed at present. In table 5 the data are arranged according to experiments, w^hile in table 6 they are arranged according to the map regions involved. In both tables two sets of values are given for some of the experiments. The upper value in these cases is based on all of the flies, and the lower value on only those showing scaly. In the experiment involving scaly and hunch alone the two values, thus obtained, differ markedly. But the numbers are small 42 Linkage Group III. in this case, and since these two genes are involved in two other experiments, giving larger counts, the latter are used for calculating the map distance. The probable order of the genes in group III has been considered above and it remains to estimate the length of the map regions. With the locus of scaly as the zero-point, the distance to spread is estimated as about 21 units on the basis of experiment 56. Since spread and hunch can not be used together satisfactorily, hunch is located with reference to scaly rather than spread. The value believed to be most reliable is that obtained from experiments 60 and 61, counting only the scaly flies. This is approximately 31 units. The hunch-telescoped value is also taken from these two experiments, giving an average of approximately 17 units. Tel- escoped is accordingly placed at 48 rb on the map. The telescoped- garnet value of 43 units is taken from experiment 61. This places garnet at 91 on the map, and it seems probable that subsequent data will increase this to well over 100. Linkage Group IV. 43 V. LINKAGE GROUP IV. In group IV only three mutant characters are known, acute, pinched, and hump. The first is sometimes difficult to classify, but the other two are excellent. Their linkage relations may be sum- marized by saying that up to the present time no crossing-over has been detected between any two of the three, although fairly large counts have been obtained. Table 5. — Summary of cross-over experiments in group III. Experiment No. Mating. Cross-over percentage. Total flies. 60 57 58 56 61 59 S X h t S Xh S Xt S X 6p S h t X G. . sp X G Counting all: S-h 40.8, h-t 18.8 j 1,137 Counting only S: S-h 31.3. Counting all: S-h 26.1 Counting only S: S-h 14.0 Counting all: S-t 43.0 Counting only S: S-t 39.6 Counting all: S-sp 23.8 Counting only S: S-sp 21.1 Counting axl: S-h 32.8, h-t 9.1, t-G 42.9. Counting only S: S-h 30.9 Counting all: sp-G 41.8 479 134 64 650 240 227 109 219 84 141 Table 6. — Summary of cross-over data on group III, arranged according to regions. Region. Exp. No. Total flies. Cross-overs. Per cent. S-sp S-h h-t t-G ep-G 56 56 60 60 57 57 61 60 61 61 59 227 109 1,137 479 134 64 219 1,137 219 219 141 , counting counting , counting counting counting counting counting all flies. . . . only S flies . all flies. . . . only S flies, all flies. . . . only S flies, all flies. . . . 54 23 465 150 35 9 72 214 20 94 59 23.8 21.1 40.8 31.3 26.1 14.0 32.8 18.8 9.1 42.9 41.8 DESCRIPTION AND ORIGIN OF CHARACTERS IN GROUP IV. Acute (ac). (Plate 3, Figure 10.) Description. — Acute is characterized by short, pointed wings and small anterior dorso-central bristles. The posterior and often the anterior sterno-pleural bristles are reduced to hairs, the anterior and posterior scutellar bristles are close together, and one or more of the orbital bristles are frequently absent. In addition the fifth vein, and less often the second vein, is slightly shortened. The flies tend to be small and to have short legs, but they can not be classified accurately on this basis. Origin. — (See Metz, 1916, p. 597.) Acute arose in concave stock and was at first thought to be a form of concave. 44 Linkage Group IV. Pinched (P). (Plate 3, Figure 11.) Description. — Pinched is a dominant. In heterozygous flies the anterior cross- vein is shortened, so that the third and fourth longitudinal veins are almost pinched together, and a characteristic short branch projects from the fourth vein below the first basal cell. Homozygous flies exhibit these same features, and in addition the effect often extends to other veins; the posterior cross-vein may be shortened and may lie diagonally between the fourth and fifth longitudinal veins and the latter may be broken or shortened. No difficulty is experienced in classifying pinched flies, but considerable variation is exhibited in both heterozygous and homozygous individuals, and it is not possible to separate them in a mixed culture. The pinched factor does not have the completely lethal effect frequently exhibited by dominants when homozygous. It does, however, have a very detrimental effect on the viability and fertility. Origin. — (L 252.) Pinched appeared in a culture carrying hump, and the pinched factor shows complete linkage to that for hump. Evidently the mutation occurred in the chromosome carrj'ing the hump factors, for the two have remained inseparable; consequently all homozygous pinched flies are hump. It should be noted that although pinched is always accompanied by hump, the converse is not true, for hump arose independently some months before the appearance of pinched and the original hump stock is free from pinched. The two mutations may have occurred in the same locus, producing allelomorphic characters, but the characters bear no relation to each other, one affecting the thorax, the other the wings, and probably merely constitute a case of complete linkage. This is made all the more probable by the apparent absence of crossing-over between either of these characters and acute (see below) . Hump (hp), (Figure 11.) Description. — Hump is characterized by an unusually arched and shortened thorax and a dark, glossj^ body-color somewhat like that of forked. The males may also be dis- Fig. ii. — Hump, tinguished by the absence of color in the testes, which in normal flies are orange red. It has excellent viability and fertility. Origin. — Hump was first observed in a"normal" stock descended from flies ob- tainedf rom Dr. Roscoe Hyde, and taken from astock originally secured in Terre Haute, Indiana. LINKAGE DATA. Detection of Linkage in Group IV. Acute and pinched. — Since pinched is a dominant character, males heterozygous for acute and pinched were back-crossed to acute females. Two such matings (L 497, L 505) gave the following count : acute 84, pinched 100, wild-type 0, acute pinched 0, which shows that acute and pinched are linked. Acute and hum-p. — In this case the preUminary indications of hnkage were obtained from the F2 of a mating between acute and hump. This gave (L 561): wild- type 68, acute 27, hump 16, without any acute hump flies. Linkage Data. 45 Pinched and hump. — The linkage of pinched and hump was verified by both F2 counts and back-crosses. In the latter, males heter- ozygous for pinched and hump, in the same chromosome, were back-crossed to hump females and gave (L 338, L 344) : 99 wild-type, 77 pinched hump, no pinched, and no hump offspring. Complete Linkage of Acute, Pinched, and Hump. Further matings involving acute, pinched, and hump have indicated an extremely close, if not complete, linkage between them. Up to the present time no certain case of crossing-over has been obtained among 151 flies in back-crosses involving pinched and hump (experiment 62) and 978 flies involving acute and pinched (experiment 63), where heterozygous females were used and cross- overs would be expected to appear. In one culture a single fly with abnormal wing venation was found which was recorded as possibly pinched, and may have represented a cross-over. Unfortunately it died without giving any progeny. The dissimilarity of the three characters involved makes it im- probable that they are allelomorphs, as does also the fact that no effect has been observed on the heterozygotes involving hump and acute, or pinched, hump, and acute. It should be noted that these flies were not examined specifically with this point in mind, but it is unlikely that any appreciable effect of either gene would have been overlooked. Since pinched appeared in connection with hump, and no cross-overs have been detected, the gene for pinched has always been accompanied by that for hump, and it is not known whether pinched would be altered if the gene for hump were elim- inated. The complete linkage involved here suggests at once that the genes might be in the small spherical m-chromosome that resembles the "fourth" chromosome of D. melanog aster, in which there appears to be very little crossing-over (see p. 76). 46 Linkage Group V. VI. LINKAGE GROUP V. Group V includes five characters, thus equaling the number of the workable characters in group III, the largest of the other auto- somal groups (leaving steel out of account in the latter). It also presents the same difficulties as does group III in the way of irregular characters and characters that can not be used satisfactorily in combination. DESCRIPTION, ORIGIN, AND COMPARISON OF CHARACTERS IN GROUP V. Fused (fu). (Plate 4, Figure 4.) Description. — Fused is ordinarily used as a recessive, but may often be distin- guished in heterozygous flies. In homozygous flies the third and fourth longitudinal veins are fused or lie very close together from the base to the anterior cross-vein; the -nings are held at an angle from the body; the ocelli and surrounding bristles on top of the head are entirely gone; and usually some or all of the bristles on the scutellum are lacking. In addition, the mutant is considerably weaker than the normal and usually gives a deficient ratio in crosses. In heterozygous flies the ■s\ings appear to be normal, but some or all the bristles on top of the head, and sometimes the ocelli also, may be lacking. The effect of fused is exaggerated by net. Flies heterozygous for fused and net, on the average, lack more bristles on the head than those heterozygous for fused without net. The heads in this case are almost com- pletely bald. Origin. — (V 778.) Fused, like many of the other non-sex-linked characters, was first observed in a mass culture. Comparison. — Fused bears a slight resemblance to the sex-linked "fused" of D. melanogaster, but not enough to indicate any probability of homology between the two. Interrupted (i). (Plate 4, Figures 6 to 8.) Description. — Interrupted is a variable character grading into normal and fre- quently not distinguishable. In extreme cases, the posterior cross-vein is broken or almost gone (fig. 6, plate 4). The break may be near the middle, but is more often near the fourth vein, or at the junction with this vein. It seems probable that inter- rupted is exaggerated by approximated, for it seems to be distinguishable more often in the presence of approximated than in its absence. It is difficult to make certain of this without extensive tests, however, for environmental conditions appear to be an important factor, and these may have been more favorable in the former case. Large, well-fed flies tend to show the interrupted character more often than small, under-fed ones. For instance, in one count of 130 flies (M 1) from stock every fly was interrupted, while in others, especially old bottles, many appear normal. Origin. — (E 15.) From a pair mating in which both parents were heterozygous for hunch and fused, 178 offspring were obtained, of which 28 lacked posterior cross- veins. It subsequently developed that two mutant characters, interrupted and ap- proximated, were involved here, and since their distinguishing features were not known at the time, the records do not tell the exact number of each in this culture. Since they are both recessives, however, it is apparent that each parent must have been heterozygous for them. Subsequent tests showed that the fused stock carried approximated (concealed by the fused character) ; hence the mutation responsible for this character probably occurred eariUer than that for interrupted. Comparison. — Characters similar to interrupted are known in D. melanogaster and in D. willistoni. We have tested two such characters in the former species, but neither resembles interrupted sufficiently to be considered as a homologue. Description of Characters. 47 Branched (B). (Plate 4, Figures 1, 2, and 3.) Description. — Branched is a dominant, irregular in its manifestation and incon- stant in its appearance. It is usually characterized by a branch extending distally from the posterior cross-vein. This is often accompanied by slight protuberances or branches above the second vein, near its tip, in the region affected by confluent, triangle, and extra. The branch from the posterior cross-vein may be long or short, or may not connect with the cross-vein. When this happens a short vein lies free in the cell beyond the posterior cross-vein. Sometimes only a vestige of this is present, and frequently no extra veins appear. Homozygous flies are more extremely affected, on the average, than heterozygous ones, but the two types over-lap and can not be differentiated. Homozygous branched flies are viable and fertile and breed readily in pure stock. Origin. — (V 601, V 606.) Several branched flies were found in a stock bottle. From these, two males were out-crossed and gave respectively (V 601) 60 branched, 79 wild-type, and (V 606) 33 branched, 67 wild-type, showing the dominance of branched. Approximated (a). (Plate 4, Figures 5, 7, and 8.) Description. — The nature of this character may best be appreciated by an ex- amination of figure 5, plate 4, and a comparison of the wild-type wing shown in figure 1 of plate 2. The name is derived from the fact that the two cross-veins are closer together than usual. This is apparently due almost entirely to a modification of the posterior cross-vein. The junction of this vein and the fifth is slightly nearer the base of the wing than usual, but is not moved much. The junction with the fourth vein, however, is shifted considerably toward the base, making the distance between the cross-veins along the fourth vein about two-thirds as long as usual. In wild-type flies the segment of the fourth vein between the two cross-veins is con- siderably longer than the apical segment of the fifth vein. In approximated flies it is shorter. In the latter the posterior cross-vein is also usually bent in an S shape instead of being straight. In flies heterozygous for approximated the condition is somewhat intermediate (plate 4, fig. 8), but nearer wild-type than homozygous approximated. Such flies are readily distinguished from approximated, but it is difficult to separate them from wild- type. The curved cross-vein is frequently found in heterozygous flies. It is not a definite enough characteristic, however, to per- mit the use of approximated as a dominant. Origin. — See under interrupted (p. 46). Ruffled (ru). (Figure 12.) Description. — In ruffled flies the tips of the dorso- central bristles and the hairs near them are curved forward and toward the midline of the thorax, as if they had been brushed back toward the head and in from the sides. This gives the thorax a ruffled appear- ance. The viability of ruffled flies is very good, making the character one of the best for linkage studies. Origin.— {M 113.) 24 ruffled flies (both sexes) appeared in the progeny of two pairs from a previous mating of two pairs. At least one male and one female of the former must have been heterozygous for the new character. -^^zf^f^'^ Fig. 12.— Ruffled. 48 Linkage Group V. LINKAGE DATA. Considerable difficulty is encountered in using the characters of this group in combination for linkage tests, because some are irregular in appearance, and all but ruffled affect the wings. Branched is unsatisfactory because it does not always manifest itself; interrupted causes difficulty for the same reason, and also because it prevents the detection of approximated, in some cases, by removing most of the posterior cross- vein; and finally fused often interferes with the identification of approximated by eliminating the anterior cross-vein. For these reasons it is usually necessary to classify some of the flies as doubtful, with the result that cross-over values are not accurate. The new character "ruffled" was obtained too recently to permit of extensive use in linkage tests, but it promises to be very valuable for this purpose, since it does not affect the wings. Detection of Linkage in Group V. Branched and fused. — The linkage of these two characters was revealed when heterozygous males were back-crossed to fused females (branched being a dominant). This type of mating gave (E 581, E 607, E 615): 140 fused, 199 branched, and 5 (somatically) wild-type offspring — the latter almost certainly being genetically branched. (See above under "branched.") Branched and approximated. — Linkage in this case was likewise detected by back-crossing heterozygous males (E 1123, E 1139), from which the following offspring were obtained: branched 115, approximated 162, branched approximated 0, and wild-type 9 (the latter presumably genetically branched). Fused and interrupted. — Linkage in this case was indicated by the F2 results following a cross of fused and interrupted. The counts here were (E 560, E 569) : wild-type 148, fused 62, and interrupted 84, with the double recessive class lacking. Interrupted and approximated. — These characters were shown to be linked by the following back-cross, a heterozygous male, which had received both mutant genes from one parent, mated to a double reces- sive female, gave 51 interrupted approximated flies, 49 wild-type, two approximated (genetically interrupted also), and no interrupted. Branched and ruffled. — Back-crosses of heterozygous males were used to detect the linkage in this case also. Two of these (M 325 and M 327) gave 67 branched, 38 ruffled, 4 wild-type (presumably genetically branched), and no branched raffled. Cross-over Values. Fused and interrupted. — Data involving these two characters are subject to error, due to the irregularity of interrupted and the low viability of fused. The results of 6 back-crosses are given under experiment 64. It is evident that a large proportion of the genetically Linkage Data. 49 interrupted flies here appear to be normal, hence it is unsafe to use the total count. Using only the interrupted flies, a cross-over value of 19 per cent is obtained. Fused and branched. — Back-crosses of females heterozygous for these two characters, in opposite chromosomes gave 49 cross-overs in a total of 271 flies, a cross-over value of approximately 18 per cent (experiment 65). Fused and approximated. — Experiment 66 gives the results from back-crosses involving these two characters alone. Owing to the difficulty of classifying approximated in the presence of fused, only the not-fused flies are used in calculating the cross-over value. These give a value of 35 per cent. Breeding tests of flies in both the approximated, and the fused (not approximated) classes, were made to verify the classification. Interrupted and branched. — Experiment 67 gives the results of 6 back-crosses involving these two characters. The data are very unsatisfactory, for both characters are irregular in appearance, making the wild-type class very large, at the expense of the two non-cross-over classes. Using only the interrupted flies a cross-over value of 2.4 per cent is obtained. This seems to indicate close linkage between the two, but it needs to be checked by the opposite type of mating, using both mutant genes in one chromosome, to make sure that branched does not tend to conceal interrupted. Interrupted and approximated. — The regularity in appearance of interrupted varies considerably in different bottles (see description), and for this reason many of the data can not be used for linkage calculations. Furthermore, it is often difficult to classify approx- imated in the presence of interrupted. Experiment 68 gives the results of 6 back-crosses involving interrupted and approximated (both genes in the same chromosome). In the first part of this experiment, the flies were all put in the four regular classes, the doubtful ones being classified as accurately as possible. Values have been calculated here by using (1) only the not-interrupted flies, (2) only the interrupted flies, and (3) all flies. These are respectively 21, 13 and 17 per cent. The second part of the experiment is from counts in which especial attention was paid to separating the inter- rupted flies into three classes — those that were approximated, those that were not approximated, and those that were doubtful. When only the not-interrupted flies are counted, a cross-over value of 16 per cent is obtained. Another method of handling the data in the second part of the experiment has been used to obtain the value given. This permits the use of all flies by dividing the doubtful flies between the inter- rupted and the interrupted approximated classes in proportion to the sizes of the latter. On this basis 16.2 per cent (35) are added to the 50 Linkage Group V. interrupted class and the remainder to the interrupted approximated class. A calculation of the totals thus obtained, using all of the flies, gives 16.9 per cent crossing-over. Using only the interrupted flies it gives 17.5 per cent crossing-over. When all of the data in both parts of the experiment are used, a value of 17 per cent is obtained. The agreement between these various values is sufficient to indicate that 17 per cent is probably not far from the correct value. Branched and ruffled. — RufSed has thus far only been tested with branched. Four back-crosses (experiment 69), in which the mutant genes were in opposite chromosomes, gave 200 non-cross-over flies and 198 cross-overs. This gives a value of approximately 50 per cent, showing that ruffled is remote from branched. DISCUSSION. On the basis of the experiments involving two genes at a time, the following (approximate) values are obtained: branched-fused 18 per cent, branched-interrupted 2.4 per cent, fused-approximated 35 per cent, interrupted-approximated 17 per cent, f used-interrupted 19 per cent, branched-ruffled 50 per cent. Since interrupted is placed here with reference to both fused and approximated, it is possible to arrange the three genes in a series, in which interrupted comes about midway between the other two. Since branched and interrupted appear to be closely linked, and give nearly the same cross-over value with fused, branched should fall near interrupted. It should be possible to check these values by means of three-point crosses, but we have not been able to do so, thus far. Since branched and interrupted are both irregular, it is unsafe to use them in the same experiment, and it is unsafe to use fused with interrupted and approximated for reasons mentioned above. This leaves only the combination branched, fused, approximated with which to make the test. And in the results obtained from this (experiment 70) the two smallest cross-over classes are so nearly equal that it is impos- sible to determine which represents the double cross-overs. The order should be either fused-branched-approximated, or branched- f used-approximated, with a value of about 19 per cent for the first region and 38 per cent for the second, in either case. If the former order is correct, the fused approximated value (60 per cent) is much greater than that (35 per cent) obtained when these two characters were used alone. On the other hand this agrees better with the two-point experiments involving interrupted, because it places branched near interrupted and between the other two. The location of the genes on a map may be postponed until the loci are determined more accurately. For this reason the characters are merely fisted in figure 8 below a map of 57 units length, which is the length indicated by experiment 70. Linkage Group VI. 51 VII. LINKAGE GROUP VI. After much of the present paper had been written, a new mutant character appeared which bears considerable resemblance to the fourth-chromosome character "bent" in D. melanogaster. On account of this resemblance it is also called bent. It has not been studied fully, but, as indicated below, it does not appear to be in any of the preceding linkage groups. Bent (be). (Plate 5, Figure 2.) Description. — Bent appears to involve modifications in three separate parts of the fly — legs, wings, and eyes. None of these is absolutely constant, however. The legs vary from normal to a condition in which they are very much shortened and more or less distorted. The first part affected seems to be the basal tarsal joint on the hind legs, which is often greatly shortened and may be thickened, when the legs are otherwise nearly normal. Different degrees of modification of the hind legs are shown in figure 2 of plate 5. The leg on the left in this figure is from a fly from normal stock, those on the right are from bent stock. The effect on the wings is less marked and is seldom observed. Usually only one wing is affected. The modi- fication resembles the short wing types in concave (plate 3, fig. 6), and frequently involves a partial spreading of the wings. The sharp bend near the base of the wing characteristic of bent in melanogaster is lacking, or at least is much less marked. The eye modification may be described as speckled. Small dark specks appear here and there over the eye surface, due apparently to irregularities in the small hairs between the ommatidia. The speckling of the eye is practically constant, although very slight in some individuals. It is possible that the speckling of the eye is a distinct mutant character, due to a different gene from that responsible for the other two modifications, but this seems highly improbable. It arose with bent and appears to be inseparable from bent. Bent is greatly influenced by environmental conditions. Some bottles of pure stock give mostly normal flies, with the "bent" ones appearing mainlj'^ toward the end of the hatch. Preliminary experiments indicate that crowding, dryness, or poor food conditions favor the development of the leg and wing modifications. When mass cultures and pair matings were carried on side by side, the mass cultures gave a higher percentage of flies exhibiting the leg modification. The flies from the pair matings were considerably larger and better fed than those in the mass cultures. Origin. — (M 346.) From a pair mating made to test for a possible short bristle character, the Pi female was removed and put in a fresh bottle with an Fi male. The small-bristle character failed to materialize, but in the latter culture several flies were found which had short tarsi on the hind legs. These were especially marked among the last flies that hatched. Altogether 15 females and 10 males vdih. short hind legs were obtained, together with 57 females and 40 males that were not noticeably affected. The separation was made on the basis of the legs alone, as the eye modification was not noticed until afterwards. The Pi female and the male used in the second bottle had normal legs. Comparison. — Bent appears to correspond closely to the bent of melanogaster in its effect on the legs. The wing modification is somewhat similar to, but is not so nearly a duplicate of, that in melanogaster. In both species the character is very variable and dependent on environment. The same stock may give at one time almost all normal appearing flies and at another time almost all bent flies. We have reared one culture of bent melanogaster in a small v\bX under crowded conditions and found that practically all exhibited the leg modification, which suggests that crowding may have the same effect here as in virilis. In these respects, then, the 52 Linkage Group VL two mutant races seem to agree. The eye modification, however, is absent or incon- spicuous in melanogaster bent. Linkage Tests with Bent. The origin of bent indicated that it was an autosomal recessive, and this is borne out by subsequent tests. Since bent was not alwa^'s recognized at first, it is impossible to tell just how man}'^ flies in the original culture were bent. Two matings of normal flies from this bottle both gave bent. Lilcewise matings of bent flies gave bent, apparently pure stocks. Several out-crosses were also made from this bottle and no bent flies were found in Fi in any of these. In F2, however, bent appeared in every bottle. All of these results indicate that bent is a recessive. Bent flies from the original culture were out-crossed to confluent garnet pinched flies, to branched flies, and to concave telescoped acute flies. The first four are dominants representing groups II, III, IV, and V respectively, and the last three are recessives from groups II, III, and IV respectively. From the former crosses heter- ozygous males were back-crossed to bent females, and from the others pairs were mated to secure F2 counts. Unfortunately, when this was done it was not known that bent appeared best in crowded bottles, hence most of the offspring appeared normal when the leg modification was used for classifj'ing. However, several cultures of each type were made up and a sufficient number of unquestionable bent flies have appeared to give conclusive results. These experiments are being repeated and the counts need not be given here in detail, but they may be summarized by saying that recombinations were obtained with all of the above characters. Since these included two representatives of groups II, III, and IV, and one from group V, the results seem to show conclusively that bent is in an independent linkage group (group VI) unless some unusual genetic behavior is involved, of which there is no evidence. Reasons have already been given for considering linkage groups I to V as repre- senting the five large chromosomes. Bent, therefore, appears to represent the small m-chromosome. This fact, together with the resemblance of bent to the bent of melanogaster, which is a fourth, or w-chromosome character, provides evidence for considering the two characters homologous, and for considering the m-chromosomes of the two species homologous. In the case of the large chromosomes such resemblances as those shown by the two bents might well be due to accidental mimicry, but in the minute m-chro- mosomes the chance of such mimicry is reduced to a minimum. Net (Nt). (Plate 5, Figure 1.) Description. — Net is characterized primarily by its small, slender bristles and by the frequent absence of many of the head bristles. Associated with these are a whole series of minor modifications affecting nearly all parts of the fly. The name is de- rived from the network of veins in extreme specimens. Extra veins or bits of veins appear frequently between the costa and second vein, resembling those of triangle and extra; others appear occasionallj'' between the second and third veins near the apex, and more often in the neighborhood of the posterior cross-veins. The latter resemble those of the character branched. In some specimens no extra veins are present and the wings appear to be normal, while in others the wing is a network of veins. Between the two extremes practically all intermediates appear. Among the other characteristics of net may be mentioned its somewhat smaller size and paler color, the occasional speckling of the eyes like that found in bent, but less extreme, the absence or disarrangement of some of the hairs on the thorax and head, the paler bands on the abdomen and the frequent appearance of abnormalities of the abdominal segments. In some cases the head is denuded of hairs and bristles over the entire interocular region. Rarely a specimen appears in which the eyes and legs are like Net. 53 those of bent, described above. It is thought that these may be homozygous, but the few found thus far have failed to breed. Net exhibits as many pecularities in behavior as it does in appearance. It ia a dominant and is lethal, or nearly so, in a homozygous condition. No fertile homo- zygous flies have been obtained. The viability of net files is very poor; their de- velopmental period is longer than that of most races; they begin hatching from two to four daj's later than their normal sibs, and they usually fall far behind expectation in number. Origin. — (L 462.) Net was first recognized among the offspring of a pair mating in which both parents were heterozygous for telescoped and hump and one parent was heterozygous for pinched. Only one fly was observed to be net, but it is possible that other net flies would have appeared if the culture had been a good one. The peculiarities of net suggest that it is a "deficiency" instead of an ordinary gene mutation, and that it may be analogous to Bridges' (1921) "diminished" in D. melanog aster, with which it agrees fairly closely in appearance and behavior. Diminished is due to the ab- sence of one of the two small 7n-chromosomes. In our material (of net), however, cytological examination has shown that all of the chromosomes are present. But crosses with bent support the conclusion that net is a deficiency and that it is probably due to the absence or inactivation of a part of a chromosome containing genes homologous to those in the m-chromosomes ("fourth chromo- some") of melanagoster. When net and bent are crossed the Fi net flies are all bent. When Fi net bent males are back-crossed to bent females the offspring are of only two classes, net bent and bent. This indicates that net and bent are in the same Unkage group (chromosome) and also that net is a deficiency for bent. Corroborative evidence is furnished by the fact that both net and bent show independent segregation with characters in the other five linkage groups. Fi net bent females have not been back-crossed, because all that have been tested (about a dozen) have been sterile. 54 Additional Characters. VIII. ADDITIONAL CHARACTERS. In addition to the above characters whose linkage relations are known to some extent, the following characters have been found, but have not yet been placed with certainty in any linkage group. These are characters that are difficult to test for linkage, because of poor viability, irregularity of appearance, or interference with the classification of other characters. Since the linkage tests have not been completed, none of the data are included here. Extra (E). (Plate 5, Figure 3.) Description. — Extra is a dominant character somewhat like the sex-linked domi- nant triangle. It is not uniform in appearance, but usually takes the form of a V- shaped branch above the second vein near its apex. Occasionally it is lacking and the fly appears normal. In combination "svith the other wing characters, concave, confluent, pinched, or branched, extreme effects are produced. In the first case the wing is apt to be crinkled and the costal vein thick around the end of the wing. In the others more extra veins appear than would come from the sum of the two char- acters acting alone. With confluent the effect of both characters is exaggerated; an irregular network of veins is apt to be present, and thickenings appear at the junction of cross-veins and longitudinal veins. With pinched, extra veins appear not only above the second vein, but also between the third and fourth (the region affected by pinched). With branched a cluster of veins usually appears in both the region normally affected by extra and in that normally affected by branched. When all three characters — pinched, branched and extra — are combined, the three correspond- ing clusters of veins appear (plate 4, fig. 3). Origin. — (M 21.) Among the offspring of a spine female by confluent (dominant) concave males one confluent female appeared with net-like wings. When mated to normal-appearing brothers this female produced the following classes of offspring: confluent 16, extreme confluent (net-like) 39, wild-type 39, and extra vein 19. This and subsequent matings indicate that the net-lilce condition in the confluent flies and the extra-vein condition in part of the others is due to the same gene — that for "e.xtra." Spine (sn). (Plate 5, Figure 4.) Description. — The only distinguishing characteristic that we have been able to detect in spine is the presence of a small bristle arising from one of the sense-organs on the third vein opposite the posterior cross-vein. It is very inconstant in appear- ance, frequently being absent or present in only one wing. It ordinarily behaves as a recessive, but in at least one case it was manifest in an Fi fly from an out-cross, which suggests that it may occasionally act as a dominant. Origin. — (E 1286.) One male from pinched stock, found by Mr. M. Demerec. Capsule (op). Description. — Capsule is a recessive character affecting the wings. As the name implies, the wing is swollen and cylindrical like a capsule. AU trace of venation is gone. Both wings are bladder-like and stand out at right angles from the thorax. The viability and fertility of capsule flies are very poor and the stock was lost before linkage tests were made. The males appeared to be sterile, although only a few were tested. In the heterozygous condition capsule has an exaggerating effect on confluent, as shown in figure 2 of plate 3. All of the confluent flies from a cross of confluent by a capsule were of this extreme tj^pe. METZ PLATE 5 CM X > '^i — r. C ^3 ■T. ~ 5 ^ v. Minus. 55 Origin. — (L 92.) Two capsule flies, one male and one female, were found among the ofTspring of a concave female from stock. The capsule female mated to normal brothers gave 24 capsule to 60 not-capsule offspring. Three capsule females from this culture mated to confluent males gave 9 wild-type and 13 exaggerated confluent flies of the type described above; 3 other capsule females mated to wild-type males from stock gave only wild-type offspring (about 20). Minus (mi). Description. — Minus flies frequently lack one or more of the thoracic bristles, particularly the scutellar or dorso-central bristles. Occasionally the effect may be reversed, and one or more bristles may be doubled. The character is very inconstant in appearance and seems to be affected greatly by environmental conditions. In some cases nearly all the flies in the homozj'^gous stock will appear normal. The character is a recessive. Origin. — (L 22.) Many flies from a stock carrying wax. 56 Comparison of Characters IX. COMPARISON OF MUTANT CHARACTERS IN D. VIRILIS WITH THOSE IN OTHER SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA. Several species of Drosophila have now been studied sufficiently to permit a comparison of their genetic behavior. With the excep- tion of D. virilis and of the well-known D. melanogaster, these are listed in table 7, together with references to the papers dealing with them and a statement as to the number of mutant characters in each. Their chromosomal relations may be determined by reference to figures 1 and 2. By examining the table an estimate may be made of the extent of the published information on the various species. Table 7. Species. References. Mutant characters. Chromosomes. Characters mentioned not described. Sex-linked. Autosomal. Hap- loid No. Type. Reces- sive. Domi- nant. Rcccs- Domi- sive. nant. D. affinis Sturt D. busckii Coq D. caribbea Sturt . . D. funebris Fabr. . . D. hydei Sturt D. immigrans Sturt . D. obscura Fall .... D. repleta Will D. similis Will D. simulans Sturt . . D. willistoni Sturt. . Hyde, R. R., 1915 1 2 1 5 4 4 6 K A L G 2 S 2 Non-dis- junction. Warren, D C , 1917. . Sturtevant, 192 If Sturtevant, A. H., 1918 . 1 Mohr and Sturtevant, 1919 Sturtevant. A. H., 1921a.. Sturtevant, A. H., 1921c.. 1 1 Hyde, R. R., 1915 1 1 1 6 I Hyde, R. R., 1922 Metz and Metz, 1915 4 D Sturtevant, 1921c Metz, 1916d 1 28 2 5 J Lancefield, D. E., 1922... Sturtevant. A H . 1921c 1 Sturtevant, A. H.. 1915. . Sturtevant, A. H., 1921c 1 6 I Metz, 1916 -0.0 .. -3.0 ■- yellow prune 11.3 -- rubyoid g arnet -- 44.4 44.8 -- carmine D. obscura, D. simulans, and D. funehris. In all of these the charac- ters are sex-linked and with one exception^ there are no autosomal characters of this kind known. The maximum number of loci involved is two, and two are repre- sented in all but the last two species. In D. melanogaster at least five allelomorphs are known in the forked locus, and two in the singed locus (Mohr, 1922, and unpublished data of C. B. Bridges). In each case these express different degrees of modification in the same direc- tion. Similarly in D. willistoni two ''forked" allelomorphs are known, one being more extreme than the other. The resemblance between these characters in the different species is so obvious as to suggest at once that some homology exists between them. Indeed, homology has been demonstrated in the case of forked melanogaster and forked simulans, as noted above. But in the species in which two non-alielomorphic characters are concerned it is neces- sary to find some distinction be- tween the two before a comparison can safely be made. Mohr (1922) fig. is.— x-chromosome maps of d. TTietono- has given a detailed account of forked and singed in D. melano- gaster, and has indicated a series of differences between them. In order to determine whether or not any of these differences will hold constantly between the non-allelomorphic mutants of this type in the other species, we have examined specimens of all of the available mutants. These are included in the list on page 59, together with those (in parenthesis) which we have not been able to examine (due mainly to loss of the stocks). Before considering the relationships of these we may give brief comparative descriptions of the different characters. These include practically all of the features in which differences have been found. Except where specified to the contrary the descriptions are based on comparisons of male specimens side by side under the microscope. ' A recessive, semi-lethal character in D. simulans (unpublished data of Dr. A. H. Sturtevant) with stubby bristles, not unlike those of the less extreme stubby or forked mutants. forked -■ 56.3 57. 2 -■ forked gastcr and D. simulans (from Sturtevant 1921a). In Different Species. 59 In most cases there is a moderate range of variability in the character, so the description is made to represent the average condition as nearly as possible. D. melanogaster: forked, (forked-2), forked-3, (forked-4), forked-5. singed, singed-2. D. wiUisloni: forked-l, (forked-2). stubby. D. virilis: forked. singed. D. obscura: singed. (stubby) . D. simulans: forked. D. funebris: forked. Drosophila melanogasteh. Forked. — Effect moderate to extreme. Bristles shortened, t^visted, sharply forked; not depressed. Hairs somewhat stubby, not depressed or curled. Both sexes fertile. Eggs normal. Heterozygous females apparently normal. Forked-2. — (From Mohr, 1922.) Effect slight, variable, more pronounced in females than in males. Bristles long, not crinkled or t'v^asted; one or more usually forked at tip. Head bristles rarely affected. Presumably hairs and bristles not depressed; females fertile; eggs normal. (These features not mentioned in descrip- tion.) Forked-3. — Effect slight. Bristles mostly not forked, but only stubby; not de- pressed; few bristles forked at tip, or bent sharplj^ back, hook-shaped; bristles not wavy. Hairs on thorax, abdomen, legs, and wings normal or nearly so; bristles bordering segments of abdomen curled slightly. Hairs on arista apparently normal. Both sex3s fertile; eggs normal. Heterozygous females not examined. Forked-4.— (From Mohr, 1922.) Effect strikingly like that of singed. Differs only slightly. Bristles and hairs all over the body affected; bristles curled as in singed. "The bristles are slightly thicker in forked-4 than in singed flies, small bifurcations of the bristles are somewhat more frequent in the former, and the altera- tion of the small hairs all over the body seems to be slightly less pronounced in forked-4 than in singed individuals." Females fertile, eggs presumably normal. Heterozygous females not examined. Forked-5. — Effect extreme. Bristles heavy, depressed, greatly twisted, knotted and forked, projections sharp, hairs on head, thorax, abdomen and legs depressed and often curled; hairs on costa hea\'>', stand out at a greater angle than usual. Hairs on arista practically normal. (See also under singed.) Both sexes fertile; eggs normal. Heterozygous females not examined. It is possible that forked-5 and forked-4 are identical. Singed. — Effect extreme, but not as extreme as forked-5. Very much like forked-5 in most respects. Bristles longer and more slender, but twisted and forked in much the same manner. Hairs on entire fly essentially the same as in forked-5. Females sterile. Eggs abnormal, short filaments (Mohr, 1922). Double recessive singed-forked indistinguishable from singed (Mohr, 1922). Double recessive singed-forked-4 in- distinguishable from singed or from forked-4 (Mohr, 1922). Heterozygous females not examined. Singed-2. — Effect slight to moderate, much less extreme than singed. Bristles wavy, somewhat depressed, a few slightly forked at the tip. Hairs on thorax de- pressed, those on abdomen, legs and wings practically normal. Arista practically normal. Females fertile; eggs normal. (This is not singed-2 of Mohr, 1922, which was indistinguishable from singed.) Heterozj'gous females not examined. 60 Comparison of Characters Drosophila virilis. Forked. — Effect moderate. Bristles erect, heavier and shorter than normal, wavy, a few forked sharply at tip. Hairs on entire fly somewhat shortened but not de- pressed or curled; those on arista very short, those on costa stand out at an angle of about 60°. Body-color darker and glossier than normal. Both sexes fertile; eggs normal. Heterozygous females have short bristles. Singed. — Effect extreme; probably most extreme of all the characters in the present series. Bristles and hairs much like those of singed and forked-5 melanogaster, but more extremely affected. Bristles, especially on scutellum, greatly depressed, short, thick, twisted, curled or knotted, and forked. Hairs on body and legs depressed, curled, and shortened; those on costa affected as much as in forked; those on arista nearly normal, not as short as in forked. Double recessive singed-forked is like singed, but has glossy body like forked. Heterozygous females have short bristles. Females fertile; eggs normal. Drosophila willistoni. Stubby. — Effect slight to moderate. Bristles heavy, sharply forked, not depressed. Hairs on thorax, abdomen, head, legs, and wings apparently normal; those on arista apparently normal, not branched. Females fertile; eggs normal. Heterozygous females not examined. Forked. — (From two alcoholic specimens.) Effect moderate. Bristles depressed, curled, few forked. Hairs on thorax decidedly depressed, somewhat curled; those on abdomen apparently same, those on legs and wings apparently slightly affected. Hairs on arista long, slender, normal or nearly so, not branched. Females sterile; eggs dissected from alcoholic specimen have verj' short, broad filaments, decidedly abnormal, like those of singed melanogaster . Heterozygous females not examined. Forked-2.—{Y\om. Lancefield and Metz, 1922, p. 217.) Effect extreme. Bristles twisted, thickened, forked, depressed. Hairs short, depressed, somewhat curled. Hairs on arista branched. Females sterile; eggs not examined (stock lost). Heter- ozygous females not examined. Drosophila obscura. Stubby.— {Yrom description, D. E. Lancefield, 1922, p. 372.) "Their main charac- teristic is the shortening of the macrochaetse and a bending or twisting of the bristles that occurs rather infrequently. It does not resemble the forked mutants of other species." Singed. — Effect slight to moderate. Bristles wavy, some slightly forked at tip, somewhat depressed. Hairs on thorax depressed; those on abdomen and legs not depressed. Hairs on arista slightly shortened, not branched. Body glossy black; females sterile; no eggs have been found, although females have been dissected and attempts have been made to get them to lay eggs. It is possible that eggs do not mature in singed females. Bristles of heterozygous females often shorter than normal (possibly not constant). Drosophila simulans. Forked. — Effect moderate to extreme; intermediate between forked and forked-5 (in D. melanogaster) to which it is allelomorphic. Some hairs on arista branched, not short and stubby. Females fertile, eggs normal. Resembles most closely forked melanogaster. Heterozygous females apparently normal. Drosophila funebris. Forked. — Effect slight to moderate. Bristles stubby, stout, not wavy; a few forked sharply near tip, not depressed. Hairs on thorax, abdomen, legs, and wings shortened, but not depressed and curled as in singed virilis. Some of the bristles on abdomen In Different Species. 61 forked. Hairs on costa stand out at an angle of about 60°. Females fertile; eggs normal. Resembles most closely forked virilis. Heterozygous females not examined. Relationships. One of the first points revealed by this comparison is that a similarity in name does not necessarily indicate a close similarity in the appearance of the characters in different species. For instance, forked-1 and forked-2 in willistoni suggest singed in mrilis instead of forked, which is more like stubby in willistoni. Our search for some feature upon which to base a dichotomous separation of the characters in the whole series has been largely unsuccessful. The range of modifications shown by the forked allelomorphs in melanogaster, for instance, covers most of the condi- tions found in any of the ''forked," "singed," or ''stubby" characters in the other species. No single criterion, therefore, can be used exclusively for determining homology or lack of homology. The best we can do at present is to relate the characters on the basis of the degree of resemblance. The two singed allelomorphs in melanogaster, the two forked allelomorphs in willistoni, and singed in obscura agree in regard to female sterility and presumably in regard to egg abnormality (see descriptions). This gives good ground for considering them to be parallels. It is supported also by the general appearance of the characters, which are of the t}n?^ having twisted or curled rather than jagged and sharply bent bristles. Correlated with this are the depressed bristles and curled and depressed hairs on the thorax. We may group these characters together, then, in the "singed" series. The other character in willistoni (stubby) differs in all of these respects and bears a closer resemblance to the forked allelomorphs of melanogaster. So we may group these together in the "forked" series. In obscura the character stubby represents such a slight modification that it is hard to compare with the others, especially since no specimens are available for examination. Since singed seems to belong to the singed series, however, stubby may tentatively be correlated with the forked series. These relations are shown schematically in figure 14, in which the chromosome maps are oriented so that the loci of parallels^ cor- respond. In simulans forked has been shown by Sturtevant (1. c.) to be allelomorphic to that in melanogaster, and consequently the simulans map would correspond to that of melanogaster, and iwojy be omitted here. * The term parallel is used to indicate a resemblance which suggests homology. 62 Comparison of Characters It remains, then, to determine whether or not forked and singed in virilis and forked in funebris will fit into the above series. The resemblance between the forked characters in the latter two species has been noted under the description of forked (see also Sturtevant, I.e.)- The resemblance is very close in nearly all respects, hence these two may tentatively be classed as parallels. D.obscura D. melanogabter D. wiMi5toni singed - forked - stubby ■ forked -smged ■ stubby Figure 14. X-chroraosome maps of three species of Drosophila, indicating loci of forked, singed, and stubby. We need to consider, therefore, only the singed and forked in virilis in relation to the others. In doing this it is evident at the outset that the most important criteria — sterility and egg modifica- tions— can not be used. Fortunately, however, the two characters are well marked (i. e., fairly extreme) and are different in several respects. In singed the bristles are twisted and depressed, so that they lie almost flat, especially on the thorax. The hairs are curled and are also depressed. In forked the bristles and hairs are little if any depressed, and are not noticeably curled. The bristles likewise tend to be of the sharply forked rather than the curled type. None of these features is diagnostic, but they all tend to put singed with the singed series. If a singed allelomorph with sterile females were present in virilis the case would be much stronger, but until some supporting or contradicting evidence is obtained the above relationships may be considered as at least probable. This view receives considerable support from the relations of other characters and the sequence of the loci on the map, as discussed below. In Different Species. 63 Comparison with Sex-Linked Characters in Drosoimiila melanogaster. The parallelism between yellow and forked in D. mrilis and D. melanogaster was pointed out in an earlier paper (Metz, 1918). This was extended to include crossveinless by Weinstein (1920); and it may now be enlarged by the addition of singed, as suggested above. When this is done and the X-ehromosome maps of the two species are compared, the sequence and relative positions of the four loci agree as closely as would be expected if the characters were known to be homologues. These relations are indicated in figure 15. The two outside maps in this figure are drawn to the same scale; but since the mrilis map is considerably longer than that of mela- nogaster (due presumably to a greater amount of crossing-over in this species), the relative positions of the genes are shown better by making the maps the same length. For this reason the melanogaster map is represented twice, the right-hand one being drawn to a dif- ferent scale, to equal that of virilis. Another case of close resemblance is found in the allelomorphs glazed and wax compared with the allelomorphs lozenge and lozenge-2 in melanogaster, as discussed above under wax (p. 19). The map order here is very different, however. The locus of glazed and wax is near the end of the map (102), while that of lozenge is near the middle (28). The third allelomorph, rugose, in virilis is not repre- sented in inelanog aster. Perhaps the resemblance in the two species is accidental, but the similarity in appearance and in the sterilit}', or tendency toward sterility, of the females, suggests homology, and this in turn suggests a rearrangement of genes. Of the other sex-linked characters, however, none parallels any in melanogaster sufficiently to make homology very probable. Sepia resembles prune in melanogaster, and its locus is near that of yellow, as in melanogaster, but it is on the opposite side of yellow. If the two are homologous they apparently indicate a rearrangement of genes. The case of magenta in virilis and garnet in melanogaster is similar. The characters are somewhat alike, but the map location does not correspond very closely, although the order of genes is the same. The great difficulty in both of these cases is that the charac- ters are not sufficiently reliable for comparison. If they were distinguished by a combination of features, instead of merely by the possession of darker eyes than usual, the case would be more plausible. This is especially true in view of the radical difference between the "normal" eye-colors in the two species and the fact that several dark-eyed mutants are known in each. Much the same argument may be used in the case of vermilion virilis and vermilion melanogaster, vesiculated virilis and inflated melanogaster and droop virilis and depressed melanogaster; hence it seems unnecessary to give a detailed discussion of these. Their 64 Comparison of Characters factorial relations are shown on the accompanying chromosome maps (fig. 16), with the exception of depressed, which is an autosomal character. Comparison with Sex-Linked Characters in Drosophila simulans. Turning to the sex-linked characters of other species than mela- nogaster, we find first the parallels yellow and forked in D. simulans. Since these are homologous to the yellow and forked in melanog aster the above discussion covers their case. A third character, bubble, in simulans parallels vesiculated in virilis both in appearance and in its map locus. This type of character, like many of the eye-colors, is not very reliable for comparison, but, so far as the evidence goes, it points towards homology. D. melanogaster D. virilis 0. -- 13.2 21.0 -~ Comparison with Sex-Linked Char- acters in D. willistoni. 56.5 --, 70.0 — yellow^ 71 forked' In D. willistoni, the four char- acters yellow, vermilion (unpub- lished), forked, and stubby resem- ble, respectively, yellow, vermilion, singed, and forked in virilis, and the order and relative positions of their loci on the map are similar, except that in willistoni the series begins (with yellow) at approximately the middle of the map instead of at the end. The latter fact has suggested (of. Lancefield and Metz, 1922) that the large, V-shaped X chromosome of willistoni may represent the rod- like X of melanogaster and virilis plus another rod of equal length at- tached at its end. This is in agree- ment with the apparent chromoso- mal relations of these species, and with the interpretation given by D. E. Lancefield for similar conditions in D. ohscura. A sex-linked ''crossveinless" has also been found recently in willistoni, and its locus is very close to that of vermiUon, as is the case in virilis. Whether it is above or below vermilion has not yet been determined. It will be recalled that the vermilion -- 6 crossveinless.. ~-- 24 singed.. -- 42 109 Figure 15. X-chromosome maps of Drosophila melano- gaster and D. virilis, indicating loci of ^ "parallels" (see text). In Different Species. 65 melanogaster does not agree in position (with respect to yellow, etc.) with the vermihon in virilis (see fig. 16). In the former it is between singed and forked, while in the latter it is between crossveinless and singed, at a point very close to crossveinless. The order in willistoni agrees with that in virilis, suggesting that in these the vermilions may be homologous. If crossveinless in willistoni should prove to be "located" between yellow^ and vermilion, the parallehsm would be complete.^ The only other case of close resemblance between sex-linked characters in these two species is that of short. Short virilis is similar to, but less extreme than, the least extreme of the short allelomorphs in willistoni (cf. Lancefield and Metz, 1922, fig. 13). Its locus with respect to the other characters considered above, however, is very different (fig. 16). This indicates that the two are merely mimics or else that a rearrangement of genes is probably involved. The former interpretation seems more probable, for mutants with short veins appear frequently — indeed a second "short" is now known in willistoni which is due to a mutation in another locus in the X chromosome (unpublished data). Comparison with Sex-Linked Characters in Drosophila obscura. (Figure 16.) When the sex-linked characters of D. ohscura are considered in relation to those of virilis, two different comparisons may be made, according to the manner of orientation of the map. These have been discussed by D, E. Lancefield (1922, p. 377), and need only a brief review here. Yellow, vermilion, and singed are fairly similar in the two species and their loci are in the same sequence. It is also the same sequence as that of yellow, vermilion, and forked (probably singed) in willistoni. The map-distances in the three species differ considerably, but this appears to be correlated with general differ- ences in crossing-over in the three. The parallelism of these series is suggestive of homology throughout, especially since an additional character, scute, is present and coincides in its locus in ohscura and willistoni. The case for willistoni and obscura is further strengthened by the fact that both possess V-shaped X chromosomes and that the series begins (with scute and yellow) at approximately the middle of the map. The alternative comparison of the virilis and obscura sex-linked groups is based on the resemblance between the two "glazed" characters. Glazed in obscura agrees with glazed in virilis both in appearance and in the sterility of the females. If these characters are considered as parallels, it is necessary to reorient the maps or to * Subsequent data indicate that this is the case. 66 Comparison of Characters postulate some rearrangement of loci, for with the above orientation of the maps glazed lies near the upper end in one case and the lower end in the other. In both of these comparisons the character "short" has been omitted because it is so unreliable for comparative purposes (see above, under willistoni). It is similar in the two species, however, and the sequence of loci is the same when the maps are oriented with respect to yellow, vermilion, and singed. But the short locus is much farther from the others than it is in virilis. Stubby in obscura, with a locus close to that of short, has also been omitted, although it might be compared with forked in virilis. The difficulty here is that stubby does not have forked bristles, and consequently may not be in the same category as the "forked" and "singed" characters. (See special discussion of these above.) Comparison with Sex-Linked Characters in Drosophila funebris. Comparison with the remaining species, D. funebris, involves only the character forked. As pointed out by Sturtevant (1921a, p. 63), and as noted above, forked in funebris bears a close resemblance to forked in virilis. It might also be compared with singed, however, and since there are no other apparent parallels with which to con- struct a series, both possibilities must be considered. COMPARISON OF AUTOSOMAL CHARACTERS. As might be expected from the small number involved, the auto- somal characters of D. virilis include too few "parallels," as yet, to permit of a detailed comparison of the linkage groups with those in the other species. Hence the following considerations are given mainly for the sake of completeness. The resemblance between confluent in virilis and melanogaster has been pointed out in previous papers (see under description of confluent). The probability of homology here is reduced somewhat by the fact that dominant characters of this type appear to be fairly common. Triangle in virilis, for instance, is similar to confluent, although less extreme and not lethal when homozygous. Extra also resembles confluent in some cases. The veins affected by confluent seem to be particularly susceptible to modification in this direction. In D. obscura a dominant, autosomal confluent is known (unpub- lished data of D. E. Lancefield), but this is much more extreme than those in virilis and melanogaster and involves other veins. It is improbable that this is homologous to either of the others. Concave in virilis bears a close resemblance to crumpled in mela- nogaster, and gives perhaps the most convincing evidence of homology. Both characters are autosomal recessives; both affect the scutellar bristles and the hairs on the arista in the same fashion; and both In Different Species. 67 involve an irregular series of wing modifications that ranges from the normal condition through various long, narrow, curved, or shortened forms (see figs. 5 to 7 in plate 3) to a condition in which the wing is very short and broad and is wavy or crumpled. In both cases the wings are frequently asymmetrical and are often held at an angle from the body. Crumpled is in the third-chromosome series in melanogaster at approximately 93 (unpublished data of C. B. Bridges), and concave is in the second-chromosome group of virilis (fig. 7). If we consider the genes homologous, we would compare the virilis second-chromosome group with the third of melanogaster. The only other third-chromosome characters that resemble any in virilis are ascute (at about the middle of the map) and spread (at about 65). The latter may be left out of consideration for the present, because the nature of the character makes it of little value for comparison, (i. e., spread- wing mutants are too numerous). Ascute resembles hunch in virilis, which is in the third-chromosome series. This suggests that chromosome III of melanogaster may represent chromosomes II and III in virilis combined. The presence in D. ohscura, however, of two characters like ascute, in different linkage groups, casts considerable doubt on the reliability of ascute for comparative purposes. Likewise, it should be noted that confluent is in the same linkage group as concave in virilis, while the characters resembling them in melanogaster are in different groups (II and III). It seems probable that most of the above cases involve mimicry rather than homology. The other cases of resemblance among the autosomal characters are equally doubtful, except in the case of bent and net, which have been discussed fully above (pp. 51-53). Telescoped resembles fur- rowed melanogaster in its effect on the thorax, but the eyes are affected very differently in the two cases, and the bristles are short in furrowed and not in telescoped, so that the resemblance is probably superficial. A closer resemblance is shown by the sex-linked character compressed in D. ohscura. It resembles telescoped in nearly all respects (see D. E. Lancefield, 1922). This resemblance recalls the fact that hunch in virilis is in the same linkage group (III) as telescoped and that in ohscura ascute, which resembles hunch, is sex-linked. Thus the two sex-linked characters in the one case resemble the two third- chromosome characters in the other, suggesting that the V-shaped X chromosome of ohscura represents the rod-like X of virilis, plus chromosome III. This is made improbable, however, by the presence in ohscura of an autosomal character like ascute, and also by the fact that the loci of compressed and ascute are in the part of the map that seems to correspond to the X-chromosome map of virilis. Only two other characters need be noted in this connection. The first of these is approximated. It resembles several characters in 68 Comparison of Characters. melanog aster, as for example, dachsous and are, but each of the latter involves additional modifications. The same is true with respect to approximated in willistoni, which has short legs hke dachsous. The second character is broken. This resembles cross- veinless, or characters of this type of which there are several in other species. One such autosomal character is known in obscura, two or three are known in willistoni (one being sex-linked), and a sex-hnked crossveinless is known in melanogaster and virilis. Vermilion. 69 X. THE CASE OF VERMILION, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF A REARRANGEMENT OF GENES. The resemblance between virilis, willistoni, and ohscura in respect to the location of vermilion, and their consistent difference from melanogaster in this feature, have already been pointed out. They suggest that the vermilion of melanogaster is not homologous to any of the others. This view receives some support from the obser- vations of Lancefield (1922, p. 377) on ohscura, showing that the double-recessive eosin vermilion differs from the eosin vermilion of melanogaster. As Dr. Sturtevant has suggested to us, however, the fact that vermihon is a frequently appearing mutant — at least in some species — and that only one such character is known in the sex-linked group of any of the above species supports the opposite view, i. e., that the same gene is involved throughout. This argu- ment may be questioned, perhaps, on the ground that vermilion (in ohscura and melanogaster at least) resembles the autosomal char- acter scarlet in ohscura, melanogaster, and simulans (cf. D. E. Lance- field, 1922, p. 377), but such an objection is not serious enough to rule out the hypothesis. There are other cases also (e. g., sepia, magenta, wax, vesiculated, etc.), as noted above, involving similar characters but a different map order. And more striking examples are known in other species. Sturtevant (192 Id), for instance, has presented evidence that indicates a rearranged map order in the third chromosome of D. simulans (as compared with melanogaster) , where the homology of genes has been tested by hybridization. Lancefield (1922) has observed a similar case in D. ohscura, although here no hybridization tests are possible. Both of these cases have been discussed by the authors mentioned and the details need not be given here. The most probable interpretation of the results, at least in the case of D. simulans, would seem to be on the assumption of a rearrangement of genes, brought about by a transposition of part of a chromosome. And this is the interpretation given by Sturtevant (1. c). Recent evidence obtained by Dr. H. J. IMuller, however, brings up the possibility of another interpretation for cases of this kind. In a paper presented before the American Naturalists at the Toronto meeting (1921),^ Muller described the results of experiments with a mutant race of Drosophila melanogaster in which crossing-over was greatly reduced by a "cross-over modifier." One of the pecularities of these results was that when treated in the ordinary fashion for con- structing a map they gave a reversed order of loci for certain well- known characters. This was apparently due to an excess of double 1 "A lethal gene which changes the order of the loci in the chromosome map." The title of this paper, without abstract, is printed in the Anatomical Record, Jan. 1022, 23:129. The present reference is made with Dr. Muller's permission. 70 Vermilion. cross-overs over singles. In any case, according to MuUer, it was not due to a chromosomal reorganization, as was shown by genetic test in cases where the "cross-over modifier" was eliminated. It is perhaps too early to draw general conclusions from this and other cases involving cross-over modifiers,^ but it is to be observed that Muller's case gives the appearance of involving a rearrangement of genes, and is analogous in some respects to the case of vermilion just cited and to those in D. simulans and D. obscura. Until further evidence is obtained, therefore, it is necessary to consider the possi- bility of an inverted sequence of loci being due to a disturbance in crossing-over rather than to an actual rearrangement of genes. ' Cf. especially MuUer (1916) and Sturtevant (1919). In Sturtevant's table 17 (p. 320) the three cross-overs involving the region b— pr were all doubles. Comparison of Maps. 71 XI. COMPARISON OF X-CHROMOSOME MAPS. Taking into account all, or practically all, of the characters that bear a resemblance to one another, and omitting the remainder, the X-chromosome maps of the six species considered above aj)])oar as shown in figure 16. These maps are all drawn to the same scale, based on percentages of crossing-over. The first three represent X chromosomes of the short, rod-like tji^e; the third and fourth are of the long V-shaped tj^pe; and the last (D. funebris) is rod-like, but uncertain as to length (see p. 7). Three different grades of characters are represented on these maps. Characters that give considerable indication of homology to one or more of the others are represented by words beginning with capitals; those considered as possible but not probable homologues are represented in small type; while the remainder are represented merely by marks to indicate their respective loci. The alinement of the maps is based on the apparent degree of resemblance of the characters as discussed above. One of the most striking features noticeable in a comparison of the maps is shown by the relations of j'-ellow. In the three species having the rod-like type of X chromosome, yellow comes at or near the end of the map ; while in the two possessing long V-shaped X chromosomes it comes near the middle. The probability of homology throughout this series is supported by the presence in three species of a very closely linked character scute ( = scutellar) . On the basis of this resem- blance, the maps are placed so that the locus of yellow corresponds throughout, except in the case of the funebris map, where yellow is not represented. The latter has been oriented with respect to notch and forked (see Sturtevant, 1921a). If we compare the total lengths of the different maps (omitting funebris on account of the small number of loci), and consider the size relations of the chromosomes involved, we note at once that the maps are not proportional to chromosome length in all cases. If we use the melanogaster map as a standard of comparison, we find that the simulans map agrees fairly closely, but that the mrilis map is nearly 50 per cent too long. Likewise, the obscwa map, which should be approximately twice as long, is actually about three times as long. The willistoni map, on the other hand, is much too short. It should be approximately double that of melanogaster, and equal to that of obscura; but instead it is only slightly longer than that of melatiogaster. In each of these cases (excluding /wnc6r/s) the number of characters studied is sufficient to make it probable that most of the chromosome is represented. The difference appears to be due, therefore, to dif- ferences in amount of crossing-over in the various s])ecies. This interpretation is supported also by the distribution of the loci on the maps. In willistoni, where crossing-over is presumed to be low, the 72 Comparison of Maps. loci are relatively crowded as compared with those of virilis and obscura, in which almost as many loci are represented. The dif- ferences seem to be largely due to general increase or decrease in crossing-over, but it is probable that some regions in the chromosomes differ more than others in this respect. This has been shown to be the case in D. simulans (Sturtevant, 1921a), and is indicated in the D.willistoni D. obscura ■ -short 0. simulans D.virilis O.melanogaster Yellow — - Prune ^^ Rubyoid- bubble Carmine - Forked - Scute., , xYellow, irPrune 3 1 0 0 1 0 65 76 26 25 10 _'_ 9 4 13 26 3 1 3 5 1 3 4 0 1 , 141 Per cent cross-overs: se-c, 21.9; c-si, 17.7; si-e, 39.0. 82 Tabulation of Data. Exp. 35. — Sepia crossveinless short rugose. Mating: sepia crossveinless short X rugose. Cross-overs in region. Non- cross- Culture No. overs. 1 2 3 1-2 1- -3 2- -3 1- 2-3 Total. r sees se r c a seer s + 1 1 se c s r se a c r se c sr se c a r c sear M348 18 12 3 4 8 13 2 1 2 2 1 1 5 2 0 1 75 M 349 14 15 2 9 10 12 4 0 4 3 1 1 5 4 3 0 87 M 350 18 12 4 6 12 14 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 74 M351 20 14 7 1 8 17 4 2 0 5 1 0 3 0 1 1 84 M 352 Total. . 21 23 2 6 9 23 2 3 5 0 1 0 4 2 2 2 105 91 76 18 26 47 79 14 6 13 12 4 2 19 8 6 4 425 Per cent cross-overs: se-c, 20.0; c-s, 44.2; s-r, 14.8. Exp. 36. — Yellow crossveinless vermilion vesiculated. Mating: yellow crossveinless X vermilion vesiculated. Culture No. Non- cross-overs. Cross-overs in region. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 y c V vs y v vs c y c V vs + y c vs V y c V vs P900 P 901 ... . P902 P903 P904 Total . . 22 28 35 33 24 16 47 25 39 39 5 5 3 6 13 4 6 16 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 60 81 59 95 100 167 141 32 49 0 1 2 2 0 1 395 Per cent cross-overs: y-c, 20.7; e-v, 0.5; v-vs 1.0; counting only v-vs, 1.1. Exp. 37. — Yellow hairy magenta forked. Mating: yellow hairy X magenta forked. Culture No. Non- cross-overs. Cross-overa in region. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 1- -3 y ha m f y m f ha y hmf + y haf m y ha m f y m haf V 1101 V nolo V 1102O V 1103 Total 14 7 14 7 19 20 11 10 6 9 11 9 11 14 21 17 0 3 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 43 51 78 51 58 44 35 63 4 6 1 1 0 2 5 4 223 Per cent cross-overs: y-ha, 48.8; ha-m, 5.4; m— f, 4.9. Group I. 83 Exp. 38. — Yellow vesiculated forked rugose. Mating: yellow rugose X ve8iculat«d forked. Culture No. Non- cross- overs. Cross-overs in region. ToUl. 1 2 3 1-2 1-3 2-3 1-2-3 y r V8 f y vsf r yf vs r y vsf r y vsr f -I- yvafr v8 y f r y vs f r V945 V948 Total. . 15 13 6 8 1 9 2 2 10 4 13 10 7 8 3 5 0 5 1 2 4 0 2 0 5 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 94 48 21 21 3 11 14 23 10 13 I 1 7 6 0 1 8 2 1 1 142 Per cent cross-overs: y-vs, 21.1; vs-f, 40.1; f-r, 28.8; counting only vs flies, y-vs, 7.1; va-f. 47.1. Exp. 39. — Yellow vesiculated forked glazed. Mating: yellow X vesiculated forked glared. Non- Cross-overs in region. Culture No. overs. Total. 1 2 3 1 1- 2 1- 3 2 -3 1-2- -3 y V8fr« yvsfr« + yfr« V8 y r« VB f y V8 lr« y vsf r« yf V3r« yvsr* V947 40 22 1 8 8 15 10 11 5 0 0 3 5 6 0 1 136 V948 3 6 0 2 0 3 6 8 0 0 2 2 4 10 1 2 48 V950 34 11 10 9 12 23 20 16 7 1 4 4 10 4 4 2 171 V989 6 1 0 2 1 4 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 V996 11 3 0 4 1 2 3 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 28 V996o 16 2 0 2 1 6 3 4 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 40 V997 Total. . 16 3 1 0 3 2 4 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 38 126 47 12 27 26 54 47 45 13 3 8 11 24 23 5 7 478 Per cent crossovers: y-vs, 17.9; vs-f, 32.4; f-r«, 35.5; counting only vs flies, y-vs, 18.3; vs-f, 45.9. Exp. 40. — Crossveinless vermilion mageiita forked. Mating: vermilion X crossveinless magenta forked. Non- Cross-overs in region. Culture No. cross- overs. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 2- -3 v c m f c v mf c V m f cm vf cvm f + cf V m E 986 29 12 0 0 18 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 70 E 987 36 28 0 0 17 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 100 E 988 69 21 0 0 36 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 138 E 990 17 17 0 0 14 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 52 E 991 56 29 0 0 35 23 1 0 0 0 1 0 146 E 992 58 43 1 0 28 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 143 E 993 46 29 0 0 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 122 E 1024 32 14 1 0 18 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 79 E 1025 33 18 0 0 24 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 93 E 1026 33 14 1 0 16 17 1 2 0 0 1 0 84 E 1027 44 16 1 0 17 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 87 E 1046 53 22 0 0 29 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 120 E 1047 26 19 0 1 19 15 0 2 , 0 0 0 0 82 E 1048 Total.... 32 28 0 0 21 13 0 2 , 0 0 0 0 00 554 309 4 1 314 200 11 10 1 0 5 2 1411 Per cent cross-overs: c-v, 0.4; v-m, 36.9 m-f, 1.9. 84 Tabulation of Data. Exp. 41. — Vermilion singed magenta forked. Mating: vermilion singed X magenta forked. Culture No. Non- cross- overs. Cross-overs in region. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 1-3 2 -3 V si m f si V m f V si m f + v si f m v m si f vm sif f V m si P 645 P646 P648 P678 P679 Total . . 28 28 27 20 26 22 9 5 25 10 3 9 6 3 3 5 7 2 0 5 to o to to to 11 11 10 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 82 80 75 22 53 115 85 24 19 8 40 1 5 3 2 2 1 0 7 312 Per cent cross-overs: v-si, 16.3; si-m, 19.2; m-f, 5.1. Exp. 42. — Vesiculated hairy magenta forked. Mating: vesiculated hairy X magenta forked. Culture No. Non- cross- overs. Cross-overs in region. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 vs ha m f vsmf ha vsha mf + vshaf m vs ham f V 1143 V 1143a V 1144 V 1147 Total .... 35 30 19 9 10 11 9 10 5 5 4 4 14 15 8 9 1 5 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 92 49 38 38 73 60 18 46 1 11 3 2 1 2 217 Per cent cross-overs: vs-ha, 30.9; ha-m, 6.9; m-t, 2.3; counting only vs flies, vs-ha, 19.8. Exps. 43 AND 44. — Vesiculated magenta forked rugose. Mating: vesiculated forked X magenta rugose. Cross-overs in region. Culture Non- cross- No. overs. 1 2 3 1-2 1- 3 2- -3 1-2- 3 Total. vs f m r vsmr f vs r mf vsf r m vem f r vs m f r vs mf r vs m f r + V 923 20 29 14 14 2 0 13 7 1 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 109 V 924 39 40 6 15 0 1 11 8 1 0 3 6 0 1 1 0 132 V 926 15 17 5 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 52 V 927 44 36 11 7 1 0 12 14 0 0 6 1 0 0 2 0 134 V 928 3 5 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 14 V 929 21 31 7 4 0 2 5 10 1 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 89 V930 20 15 1 5 0 0 1 8 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 65 V931 12 4 1 3 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 27 V933 17 19 2 4 0 2 1 7 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 56 V934 Total. . 9 22 4 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 52 200 218 51 69 4 6 50 69 3 4 29 16 2 2 6 1 720 Group I. Exps. 43 .\ND 44. — Vesiculated magenla forked rugose — Continued. Mating: vesiculated magenta X forked rugose. 85 Non- Cross- overs in region. Culture No. cross- overs. Total. 1 2 3 1- -2 1- -3 2-3 1-2 -3 vem f r vsf r m vsmfr + vsm r f V8 mf r vaf m r vamf r vsr mf V917 8 3 3 6 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 26 V918 7 3 1 4 0 1 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 27 V921 38 29 11 27 2 0 7 10 1 1 6 5 0 0 3 0 140 V935 5 5 7 5 1 1 1 5 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 34 V936 17 12 14 19 0 0 6 11 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 89 V937 24 16 17 21 1 3 5 11 1 0 5 6 0 0 1 1 112 V938 10 12 8 8 0 0 6 3 0 1 '> 1 0 0 0 3 54 V 939 11 9 6 3 1 2 3 5 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 47 V940 17 12 4 7 1 2 9 6 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 65 V941 11 6 5 3 0 2 2 6 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 38 V942 12 10 8 12 0 1 2 8 2 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 67 V943 29 12 14 15 0 0 6 8 1 1 3 7 0 1 0 0 97 V 944 20 15 13 14 0 4 6 10 0 1 4 4 0 0 1 0 92 V 949 Total. . Grand 23 11 13 18 1 3 4 13 2 2 3 3 0 3 0 1 100 ; 232 155 124 162 7 20 62 100 10 8 44 48 0 5 6 5 988 Total. . 432 373 175 221 11 26 112 169 13 12 73 64 2 7 12 6 1708 Per cent cross-overs: vs-m, 33.7; m-f, 5.2; f-r, 26.0; counting all flies; va-m, 32.8, counting only v3 flies. Exp. 45. — Singed magenta forked short. Mating: singed short X magenta forked. Culture No. Non- cross- overs. Cross-overs in region. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 1-3 ■» -3 si 8 m f si m f s sif m s si m f s sims f si m f 3 + si f 8 m M 385 P 916a Total .... 29 19 5 20 28 3 18 11 1 0 1 0 9 1 9 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 3 89 82 49 47 8 1 1 29 1 1 18 3 1 1 0 10 0 3 171 Per cent cross-overs: si-m, 28.6; m-f, 4.1; f-s, 19.8. Exp. 46. — Yellow crossveinless vermilion magenla forked. Mating: yellow crossveinless X vermilion magenta forked. Non- Cross-overs in region. 1 Culture No. cross- overs. 1 2 3 1 4 1- -3 1 y c V m f y vm f c J' c v m f + ycmf v 1 ycf v m y V mcf L721 17 15 7 8 0 0 5 15 1 1 2 0 L 722 32 13 •> 10 0 0 15 17 1 0 4 1 L724 58 58 13 15 0 1 28 42 o 6 <» a L725 29 17 6 11 0 0 8 20 f) 0 2 3 L726 27 15 4 3 0 0 15 9 0 0 .1 •y E916 17 12 0 4 1 0 2 12 0 0 1 0 E 918 Total. 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 183 134 33 52 1 1 73 117 4 7 21 9 86 Tabulation of Data. Exp. 46. — Yellow crossveinless vermilion magenta forked. — Continued. Mating: yellow crossveinless X vermilion magenta forked. Culture No. Cross-overs in region. Total. 2-3 3-4 1-2-3 1- -3-4 y c v mf ycm vf jymf cv y v f c m L721 L722 L724 L725 L726 E916 E918 Total. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 96 237 96 78 50 11 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 639 Per cent cross-overs: y-c, 18.3; c-v, 0.6; v-m, 35.0, m-f, 2.0. Exp. 47. — Yellow vesiculated magenta forked ritgose. Mating: yellow magenta X vesiculated forked rugose. Culture No. Non- cross- overs. Cross-overs in region. 1 2 3 4 1-2 1-3 y m ve f r y vs f r m y f r vs m ymfr vsymr vsf y vsm fr y vs m f r V958 V959 V960 V 962 Total. . 29 5 30 7 14 7 25 12 3 4 3 8 5 11 2 5 3 10 6 15 5 10 11 7 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 12 0 7 3 6 5 9 12 4 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 98 31 13 28 25 42 0 7 34 20 8 2 2 0 Culture No. Cross-overs in region. Total. 1-4 2-3 2-4 1-2-4 3-4 1-3- -4 y vs f m r vemfr y vs m r y f yvsmr f y m f vs r y vsr mf V958 V959 V960 V962 Total. . 0 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 5 5 1 2 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 89 79 109 5 6 0 6 10 11 1 9 0 1 1 0 360 Per cent cross-overs: y-vs, 20.8; vs-m, 31.6; m-f, 4.7; f-r, 27.2; counting only vs flies, y-vs, 21.2; vB-m, 43.2. Group I. 87 Exp. 48. — Sepia erossveinless singed magenta forked short. Mating: eepia crossveinless singed ehort X magenta forked. Culture No. Non- cross-overs. Crosa-overs in region. 1 2 3 4 6 se c si s mf se m f c si s se c m f si s se c si m f B se c Bi f m B Be c si m f a P908 P909 P910 P917 P918 Total 12 15 9 14 25 36 1 25 10 22 6 4 3 1 4 4 6 0 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 4 4 0 7 2 3 9 5 7 5 11 1 7 1 11 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 6 2 11 1 0 0 0 1 57 112 22 12 18 11 15 45 2 1 27 2 Culture No. Cross-overs in region. 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 2-3 2- 4 se si s cm f se s c si m f se m s c si f se m f s c si se c 9 si m f se c m 6 Bif P908 P909 P910 P917 P918 Total 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 0 3 4 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 10 1 0 1 7 5 3 1 0 Culture No. Cross-overs in region. 2-5 3-4 3-5 4-5 1-2-3 1-2 -5 se c m f s si se c si m s f se c si m f 8 + se c si f B m se si m f C B aesi c m 8 f P908 P909 P 910 P917 P918 Total 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 3 1 1 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 2 15 0 3 1 2 0 1 88 Tabulation of Data. Exp. 48 — Sepia crossveinless singed magenta forked short — Continued. Mating: sepia crossveinless singed short X magenta forked. Culture No. Cross-overs in region. 1-3-5 3-4-5 1-2-3-4 1-3 -4-5 Total. se 0 si m f s se c si m f 8 se si m 8 of se f 3 0 m si P908 P909 P910 P917 P918 Total 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 72 69 118 58 89 3 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 406 Percent cross-overs: se-c, 18.7; c-si, 14.0; si-m, 28.0; m-f, 3.2; f-s, 17.9. Exp. 49. — Oblique magenta forked short. Mating: oblique short X magenta forked. Culture No. Non- cross- overs. Cross-overs in region. Total. 1 2 3 1-2 1-3 2-3 OS mfomf 8 of ms o mfs om 8 f 0 m f 3 -|- o f 8 m M 344 19 23 0 12 ' 1 0 2 3 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 65 Per cent cross-overs: o-m, 35; m-f, 9; f-s, 12; counting only not-o flies. Exp. 50. — Sepia crossveinless oblique short. Mating: sepia crossveinless X oblique short. Culture No. Non-oblique flies. Total. Non- cross- overs. Cros.s-overs in region. Oblique flies. 1 2 3 1-2 1-3 2-3 1-2-3 se c c + se c s se c s s se 8 O 8 not-s M244 M246 Total... 10 7 3 2 1 2 3 0 7 0 3 3 1 1 0 1 21 23 9 5 0 0 17 5 3 10 0 6 2 1 44 9 5 Per cent cross-overs: se-c, 27; c-o, 14; o-a, 43.2; counting only not-o flies. Group I. 89 Exp. 51. — Oblique singed. Mating: oblique X singed. Culture No. Non- cross-overa. Cross-overs. Total. o si o si + M394 23 23 0 2 48 Per cent cross-overs: o-si, 4.2. Exp. 52. — Sepia oblique singed short. Mating: sepia oblique short X singed. Culture No. Non- cross- overs Cross-overs m region. Total 1 2 3 1-3 2-3 se? OB si se si O 8 se? o si s se? o si 8 se si 8 o se? o si B + M 392 M 399 M 400 12 19 7 14 3 5 5 6 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 7 11 7 4 1 0 1 1 0 coo 0 2 1 57 42 11 Total . . . Correction" 22 38 15 .. 12 (?) 7 2 1 15 15 2 (?) 0 3 110 Corrected total .... 15 38 12 7 2 1 15 15 2 0 0 3 110 Per cent cross-overs: se-o, 19.1; o-si, 5.4; si-s, 31.8; counting all flies, se-o. 19.7; o-si. 5.6; si-s, 28.1, counting only not-o flies. "After apportioning se, o, and o. Exp. 53. — Sepia oblique singed. Mating: sepia oblique X singed. Culture No. Non- cross-overs Cross-overs in region. Total 1 2 1 -2 se? o si Be si o se? o si + se o si M 393 M 395 14 22 21 28 3 9 1 2 1 2 0 1 42 62 Total Correction" 35 50 30 12 (?) 5 2 4 1 (?) 104 Corrected total .... 30 50 12 5 2 4 1 0 104 1 Per cent cross-overs: ae-o, 17.3; o-si, 6.7; counting all flies, se-o, 19.4; o-si, 7.4. counting only not-o flies. o After apportioning ae o, and o. 90 Tabulation of Data. Linkage Experiments on Genes Group II. (Experiments 54 and 55.) Exp. 54. — Confluent concave. Mating: confluent X concave. 2 cultures (V 674, 729). Non-cross-overs (C 59; cc 64) 123 Cross-overs (C cc 36; + 54) 90 Total 213 Per cent cross-overs, C— cc 42.2. Exp. 55. — Confluent broken. Mating: confluent X broken. 2 cultures (M 299, 318). Non-cross-overs (C 74 ; b 65) 139 Cross-overs (C b 38; + 55) 93 Total 232 Per cent cross-overs, C— b 40.0. Linkage Experiments on Genes in Group III. (Experiments 56 to 61.) Exp. 56. — Scaly spread. Mating: scaly X spread. 5 cultures (M 363-5. 368-9). Non-cross-overs (S 86; sp 87) 173 Cross-overs (S sp 23; -1- 31) 54 Total 227 Per cent cross-overs, S-sp 23.8; counting only S flies, S-sp 21.1. Exp. 57. — Scaly hunch. Mating: scaly X hunch. 2 cultures (L 421, 426). Non-cross-overs (S 55 ; h 44) 99 Cross-overs (S h 9 ; + 26) 35 Total 134 Per cent cross-overs, S— h 26.1; counting only S flies, S-h 14.0. Exp. 58. — Scaly telescoped. Mating: scaly X telescoped. 2 cultures (V 1256, 1258). Non-cross-overs (S 145; t 168) 313 Cross-overs (S t 95; -I- 142) 237 Total 650 Per cent cross-overs, S— t 43.0; counting only S flies, S-t 39.6. Exp. 59. — Spread garnet. Mating: spread X garnet. 2 cultures (M 379, 386). Non-cross-overs (sp 39 ; G 43) 82 Cross-overs (sp G 24; -|- 35) 59 Total l41 Per cent cross-overs, sp-G 41.8. Exp. 60. — Scaly hunch telescoped. Mating: scaly X hunch telescoped. 8 cultures (E 519-20, 522-24, 530, M 252, 295). Non-cross-overs (S 261 ; h t 279) 540 Co. region 1 (S h t 123 ; -|- 260) 383 Co. region 2 (S t 68; h 64) 132 Co. region 1-2 (S h 27; t 55) 82 Total 1,137 Per cent cross-overs, S-h 40.8, h-t 18.8; counting only S flies, S— h 31.3. Exp. 61. — Scaly hunch telescoped garnet. Mating: scaly hunch telescoped X garnet. 2 cultures (M 375-6). Non-cross-overs (S h t 32; G 60) 82 Co. region 1 (S G 19; h t 15) 34 Co. region 2 (S h G 1 ; t 2) 3 Co. region 3 ( S h t G 23; -f- 33) 66 Co. region 1-2 (S t 2 ; h G 4) 6 Co. region 1-3 (S 5 ; h t G 22) 27 Co. region 2-3 (S h 2; t G 4) 6 Co. region 1-2-3 (S t G 0; h 5) 6 Total 219 Per cent cross-overs, S-h 32.8, h-t 9.1, t-G 42.9; counting only S flies, S-h 30.9. Linkage Experiments on Genes in Group IV. (Experiments 62 and 63.) Exp. 62. — Pinched hump. Mating: pinched hump X wild-type. (a) (P hp - +) 9 X P hp cj^ , 1 culture (L 339) Non-cross-overs P hp 25; (P) 32 57 Cross-overs P 0; (P) hp 0 0 Total 57 (6) (P hp - +) 9 X hp cf, 2 cultures (L 350, (393). Non-cross-overs (P) hp 38; -)- 56 94 Cross-overs (P) 1?; hp 0 21 Total 95 Per cent cross-overs, P-hp 0.0. Exp. 63. — Pinched acute. Mating: pinched X acute. 9 cultures (L 565, 579; E 971-2, 1089, 1096-99). Non-cross-overs (P) 515; ac 463 978 Cross-overs (P) ac 0; -|- 0 0 Total 978 Per cent cross-overs, P— ac 0.0. Group V. 91 Linkage Experiments on Genes in Group V. (Experiments 64 to 70.) Exp. 64. — Fused interrupted. Mating: fused X interrupted. 6 cultures (E 788, 826, 953, 974, 1116-7). Non-cross-overs (fu 343 ; i 279) 622 Cross-overs (fu i 64; + 233) 297 Total 919 Per cent cross-overs, fu-i, counting only i, 18.6. Exp. 65. — Fused branched. Mating: fused X branched. 2 cultures (E 606, 614). Non-cross-overs (fu 111; B 111) 222 Cross-overs (fu B 28 : + 21) 49 Total 271 Per cent cross-overs, fu-B 18.0. Exp. 66. — Fused approximated. Mating: fused approximated X wild-type. 4 cultures (M 8-11). Non-cross-overs (fu and fu a 225; + 183) 408 Cross-overs (fu not a 13; a 97) 110 Total 518 Per cent cross-overs, fu-a counting only not fu flies, 35.0. Exp. 67. — Interrupted branched. Mating: interrupted X branched. 6 cultures (E 902, 924, 953, 974, 1116-7). Non-cross-overs (i 163; B 149) 312 Cross-overs (i B 4 ; + 199) 203 Total 515 Per cent cross-overs, i-B, counting only i. 2.4. Exp. 68. — Interrupted approximated. Mating: interrupted approximated X wild-type. Culture Non- cross-overs. Cross-overs. Doubtful class. Total. J\o. ia -1- i a i. a? A. 'E 915 E 974 Tntal 80 106 36 16 16 9 2 23 211 77 116 122 18 32 288 B M 5 M 6 M 7 M 12 Total 42 80 31 107 22 100 37 106 4 13 5 19 10 22 11 23 40 56 64 50 179 218 218 227 132 393 30 77 210 842 Grand total 248 515 48 109 210 1 , 130 r Fotal 175? 423 515 35? ... 83 109 1,130 Per cent cross-overs, after apportioning doubtful flies, i-a 17. Exp. 69. — Branched ruffled. Mating: branched X ruffled. 4 cultures (M 314, 353-4, 367). Non-cross-overs (B 97 ; ru 103) 200 Cross-overs ( B ru 88; -fllO) 198 Total 308 Per cent cross-overs, B-ru 49.7. 92 Tabulation of Data. Exp. 70. — Fused branched approximated. Mating: branched X fused approximated. Culture No. Non- cross-overs. Cross-overs in region. Doubtful classes. Total. 1 2 1-2 B fu a Bfu a Ba fu + B fu a fu a? B fu a? M 118 M 135 M 141 M 160 Total. Total. 21 8 45 36 37 33 33 35 3 5 4 g 1 9 10 3 5 8 21 21 24 19 22 18 2 12 11 7 0 4 4 6 0 0 7 0 2 5 11 0 48 160 149 144 136 112 21 23 72 66 32 14 20 6 501 13? 136 125 3? 24 23 7? 72 73 32 2? 16 • • 501 Per cent cross-overs, after apportioning doubtful classes, fu-B 19.0; B-a, 38.5; or B-fu, 19.0; fu-a, 38.5. LITERATURE CITED. Bridges, C. B., and T. H. Morgan. 1919. The second chromosome group of mutant characters. Cameme Inst Wash Pub. 278: 123-304. Bridges, C. B. 1921. Genetical and cytological proof of non-di.sjunction of fho fourth chromosome of D. melanogaster. Proc. Nat. .\cah., 28: l-<>3. Hyde, Roscoe R. 1915a. The origin of a new eye-color in Drosophila repleta and its behavior in heredity, Amer. Nat., 49: 183-185. 19156. A wing mutation in a new species of Drosophila. Amer. Nat., 49: 185-187. 1922. An eyeless mutant in Drosophila hydei. Genetics, 7: 319-334. Lancefield, D. E. 1922. Linkage relations of the sex-linked characters in Drosophila obacura. Grnotics, 7: 335-384. Lancefield, R. C., and C. W. Metz. 1921. Non-disjunction and the chromosome relationships of Drosophila willistoni. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc, vol. 7, No. 8, August 1921. 1922. The sex-linked group of mutant characters in Drosophila wiUisloui. Anicr. Nat., 61: 211-241. McClung, C. E. 1914. A comparative study of the chromosomes in orthoptcran .spermatogencsia. Jour. Morph., 25: 651-729. Metz, C. W. 1914. Chromosome studies in Diptera. 1. .\ preliminary .survey of five difTcrpnt types of chromosome gniups in the Genus Drosophila. Jour. ExjH'r. Zoo., vol. 17, No. 1, July 1914. 1916a. Chromo.some studies on the Diptera. II. The paired a.«.soriation of chro- mosomes in the Diptera and its significance. Jour, of Exp. Zoo., vol. 21, No. 2, August 1916. 19166. Chromosome studies on the Diptera.* III. Addition:il ty|>o.s of chromosome groups in the Drosophilidit. .\nier. Nat., 50: 5S7-599. 1916c. Linked mendelian characters in a new species of Drosophila. Soienc»\ n. »., vol. XI, 4: 431-432. 1916d. Mutations in three species of Drosop/ii/a. Genetics, 1: 591-607. 1918. The linkage of eight sex-linked characters in Drosophila t-irilis. Genetics, 3: 107-134. 93 94 Literature Cited. Metz, C. w. 1920a. Correspondence between chromosome number and linkage groups in Drosophila virilis. Science, n.s., LI: 417-418. 19206. Observations on the sterility of mutant hybrids in Drosophila virilis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences, 6: 421-423. Metz, C. W., and B. S. Metz. 1915. Mutations in two species of Drosophila. Amer. Nat., vol. 49: 187-189. MoHR, O. L., and A. H. Sturtevant. 1919. A semi-lethal in Drosophila funebris that causes an excess of males. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med., 16: 95-96. MoHR, Otto L. 1922. Cases of mimic mutations and secondary mutations in the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Zeit. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererb., 28: 1-22. Morgan, T. H., and C. B. Bridges. 1916. Sex-linked inheritance in Drosophila. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 237. MULLER, H. J. 1916. The mechanism of crossing-over. Amer. Nat., 50: 193, 284, 350, 421. Sturtevant, A. H. 1915. A sex-Unked character in Drosophila repleta. Amer. Nat., 49: 189-192. 1918. A parallel mutation in Drosophila funebris. Science, 48: 72-73. 1919. Inherited linkage variations in the second chromosome (of Drosophila melano- gaster). Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 278: 305-331. 1920. Genetic studies on Drosophila simulans. I. Introduction. Hybrids with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 5: 488-500. 1921a. Genetic studies on Drosophila simulans. II. Sex-linked group of genes. Genetics, 6: 43-64. 19216. Genetic studies on Drosophila simulans. III. Autosomal genes. General Discussion. Genetics, 6: 179-207. 1921e. The North American species of the genus Drosophila. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 301. 1921d. A case of rearrangement of genes in Drosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 7: 235-237. Warren, D. C. 1917. Mutations in Drosophila busekii. Amer. Nat., 51: 699-703. Weinstein, Alexander. 1918. Coincidence of crossing-over in Drosophila melanogaster (ampelophila) . Genetics, 3: 135-173. 1920. Homologous genes and linear linkage in Drosophila virilis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc, 6: 623-639. . state UnWersityUbranes North Carouna State ,,co Q£NET\C S 1 uuiu^^, ,,,„ ,„„ (U,| y\ \ \\ 11 S0277627 0 G