| Court: | cacd |
| Docket #: | 2:11-cv-00449 |
| Case Name: | Solid 21, Inc. v. Rolex Watch USA, Inc. et al |
| PACER case #: | 492181 |
| Date filed: | 2011-01-14 |
| Date terminated: | 2011-06-07 |
| Assigned to: | Judge Gary A. Feess |
| Referred to: | Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Case Cause: | 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Nature of Suit: | 840 Trademark |
| Jury Demand: | Plaintiff |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Represented Party | Attorney & Contact Info |
| Solid 21, Inc. Plaintiff a Nevada Corporation headquartered in Los Angeles, California |
George E Akwo Ophir Jacob Bitton |
| Rolex Watch USA, Inc. Defendant a New York Corporation |
|
| Rolex SA Defendant a Swiss Corporation |
|
| Does Defendant 1-10, inclusive |
| Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
| 2011-01-14 | 1 | 0 | COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Rolex SA, Rolex Watch USA, Inc. Case assigned to Judge Gary A. Feess for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Solid 21, Inc. (et) (ds). (Entered: 01/18/2011) | 2014-04-28 06:54:15 | d8dc85a97f9c462ff238aab1f56f690d3b6f06c0 | |
| 2011-01-14 | 2 | 0 | CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Solid 21, Inc. (et) (ds). (Entered: 01/18/2011) | |||
| 2011-01-14 | 3 | 0 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Solid 21, Inc. (et) (Entered: 01/18/2011) | |||
| 2011-01-14 | 4 | 0 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) (Entered: 01/18/2011) | |||
| 2011-02-07 | 5 | 0 | ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 10-07079 SVW(AGRx) (rn) (Entered: 02/08/2011) | |||
| 2011-05-19 | 6 | 0 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess: Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/8/2011. (rfi) (Entered: 05/19/2011) | |||
| 2011-06-07 | 7 | 0 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Solid 21, Inc.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Bitton, Ophir) (Entered: 06/07/2011) | 2014-04-28 06:53:06 | ee28c4a7bb41a2f4d6bb709200255a5353d555e7 | |
| 2011-06-08 | 8 | 0 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 no) (bp) (Entered: 06/08/2011) |