Court: | casd |
Docket #: | 3:00-cv-01643 |
Case Name: | Verance Corporation v. Digimarc Corporation |
PACER case #: | 28752 |
Date filed: | 2000-08-15 |
Date terminated: | 2000-11-01 |
Assigned to: | Judge Thomas J. Whelan |
Referred to: | Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes |
Case Cause: | 28:1338pt Patent Infringement |
Nature of Suit: | 830 Patent |
Jury Demand: | Plaintiff |
Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
Represented Party | Attorney & Contact Info |
Verance Corporation Plaintiff a Delaware corporation |
Stephen P. Swinton |
Digimarc Corporation Defendant a Delaware corporation |
William C Rooklidge |
Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
2000-08-15 | 1 | 0 | Complaint Filed; (referred to Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes) Receipt No/Amt of Fee: #63171/$150; Jury demand (Letter prepared) (dkt clerk) (Entered: 08/16/2000) | |||
2000-08-15 | 2 | 0 | Summons issued (dkt clerk) (Entered: 08/16/2000) | |||
2000-09-13 | 3 | 0 | Return of Service of summons and cmp executed upon dft Digimarc Corporation by mail on 9/12/00 (cag) (Entered: 09/15/2000) | |||
2000-10-16 | 4 | 0 | Notice of Motion and Motion by defendant Digimarc Corporation to dismiss for of subject matter jurisdiction , to dismiss cmp for failure to state a claim , to dismiss cmp for a more definite stmt , to transfer action to the USDC Dist of OR , [ motion(s) to Judge Thomas J. Whelan ], mtn hrg set for 11/13/00 10:30 (lmh) (Entered: 10/17/2000) | |||
2000-10-16 | 5 | 0 | Memorandum of points and authorities by defendant Digimarc Corporation in support of motion to dismiss for of subject matter jurisdiction [4-1], in support of motion to dismiss cmp for failure to state a claim [4-2], in support of motion to dismiss cmp for a more definite stmt [4-3], in support of motion to transfer action to the USDC Dist of OR [4-4] (lmh) (Entered: 10/17/2000) | |||
2000-10-16 | 6 | 0 | Declaration of William C. Rooklidge by defendant Digimarc Corporation in support of motion to dismiss for of subject matter jurisdiction [4-1], to dismiss cmp for failure to state a claim [4-2], to dismiss cmp for a more definite stmt [4-3], to transfer action to the USDC Dist of OR [4-4] (lmh) (Entered: 10/17/2000) | |||
2000-10-16 | 7 | 0 | Appendix of non-published Authorities cited by defendant Digimarc Corporation in support of mtns [4-1], [4-2], [4-3], [4-4] (lmh) (Entered: 10/17/2000) | |||
2000-10-31 | 8 | 0 | Proof of service by plaintiff Verance Corporation of: Oppos to dft's motion to dismiss and Stip to dft's alternative motion to transfer on 10/30/00 by personal svc. (Opposition to motions not on file) (lmh) (Entered: 11/01/2000) | |||
2000-10-31 | 9 | 0 | Reply by defendant Digimarc Corporation in support of motion to dismiss for of subject matter jurisdiction [4-1], motion to dismiss cmp for failure to state a claim [4-2], motion to dismiss cmp for a more definite stmt [4-3], motion to transfer action to the USDC Dist of OR [4-4] (lmh) (Entered: 11/01/2000) | |||
2000-10-31 | 10 | 0 | Declaration of William C. Rooklidge by defendant Digimarc Corporation in support of reply in support of motions to dismiss pla's cmp [9-1] (lmh) (Entered: 11/01/2000) | |||
2000-11-01 | 11 | 0 | Order by Judge Thomas J. Whelan; Ct grants dft's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [4-1] and dismisses this action in its entirety w/out prejudice; all other pending mtns are denied as moot [4-2], [4-3], [4-4]; Clerk of Ct shall close the file. (lmh) (Entered: 11/01/2000) | |||
2000-11-01 | 12 | 0 | Clerks Judgment: Ct grants dft's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismisses the action in its entirety w/out prejudice; all other pending mtns are denied as moot; terminating case (lmh) (Entered: 11/01/2000) | |||
2000-11-01 | 13 | 0 | Opposition by plaintiff Verance Corporation to dft's Mtn to Dismiss and Stip to dft's alternative Mtn to Transfer. [NUNC PRO TUNC 10/30/00]. (lmh) (Entered: 11/02/2000) |