| 2012-10-17 |
111 |
0 |
|
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/16/2012: For the reasons stated below, the Stinnettes' first objection is overruled. However, given what appears to be a failure of the parties to attain a meeting of the minds as to the scope of the release based on the language in the proposed settlement, the Court denies the motion for preliminary approval of the class settlement [98-1] without prejudice. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the issue rai sed in this order and file any renewed motion for preliminary approval within 14 days of the date of entry of this order. To the extent the parties believe it would assist the Court, the renewed motion may respond to the anticipated objection from the Stinnettes regarding the actual damages issue. Mailed notice (cjg, ) |
2012-10-17 08:27:22 |
dc8aea8c7c3a7f9fc96e174e8f5cdee0ea9645c6 |