| Date Filed |
Document # |
Attachment # |
Short Description |
Long Description |
Upload date |
SHA1 hash |
| 2012-09-26 |
54 |
0 |
|
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 9/25/2012: For the reasons stated below, the defendants motion to dismiss 39 -1] is granted in part. The Sherman Act claim is dismissed. The plaintiffs are given 14 days to reallege the ir antitrust claim. Given that the Court has granted the plaintiffs leave to amend their antitrust claim, it will not address at this time the defendants'request that the Court abstain. The defendants shall answer or otherwise plead within 14 days of the filing of the amended complaint. [ For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, ) |
2012-09-26 09:38:19 |
ad489b4a93ba958cd0de66fb78358e7de6029383 |
| 2013-03-20 |
89 |
0 |
|
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 3/19/2013: For the reasons stated below, the defendants' motion to dismiss the antitrust claim [80-1] is granted. Because the plaintiffs have had several opportunities to proper ly plead that claim, the dismissal is with prejudice. The motion to stay the remaining claims [80-1] is granted. The case is placed on the Court's suspense docket and the parties are directed to notify this Court within seven days of completion of the state court case. Mailed notice (cjg, ) |
2013-03-20 08:13:40 |
3f96a9dcc0f481f9b4ff597016dfd161587d1839 |