| Court: | ilnd |
| Docket #: | 1:00-cv-02855 |
| Case Name: | Smithkline Beecham, et al v. Pentech Phar Inc, et al |
| PACER case #: | 96401 |
| Date filed: | 2000-05-11 |
| Date terminated: | 2003-08-08 |
| Assigned to: | Honorable Richard A. Posner |
| Case Cause: | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Nature of Suit: | 830 Patent |
| Jury Demand: | Both |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Represented Party | Attorney & Contact Info |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Plaintiff |
Richard J. O'Brien Courtney B Meeker Douglas I. Lewis Ford F. Farabow Jason R Buratti Kenneth M Frankel Richard B Racine Robert D. Bajefsky Scott J Popma York M Faulkner |
| Beecham Group, p.l.c. Plaintiff |
Richard J. O'Brien Courtney B Meeker Douglas I. Lewis Jason R Buratti Kenneth M Frankel Robert D. Bajefsky Scott J Popma York M Faulkner |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Defendant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Matthew S. Miller Robert Fritz Green Edgar H Haug James S. Rubin Jamison E. Lynch Jeffrey Alan Hovden John Edward Rosenquist Kevin Michael Forde Lisa D. Graver Michael Thomas Layden Monica L. Thompson Paula Davis Friedman Richard J. Prendergast Robert E Colletti Roger L. Longtin Steven H. Sklar |
| Asahi Glass Co Ltd Defendant |
Robert Fritz Green David C. Bohan Edgar H Haug Jamison E. Lynch Jeffrey Alan Hovden John Edward Rosenquist Lewis R. Clayton Lisa D. Graver Monica L. Thompson Paula Davis Friedman Richard D Kelly Robert E Colletti Roger L. Longtin Steven C Herzog Steven H. Sklar William T Enos |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Defendant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Vincent Michael Roche |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Defendant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Eric Neal Macey |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Defendant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Vincent Michael Roche |
| Apotex Corporation Intervenor |
|
| Apotex, Inc. Intervenor |
|
| TorPharm Inc. Intervenor |
|
| PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc. Intervenor |
|
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Counter Claimant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Robert Fritz Green John Edward Rosenquist Steven H. Sklar Paula Davis Friedman |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Kenneth M Frankel York M Faulkner |
| Beecham Group, p.l.c. Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Kenneth M Frankel York M Faulkner |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Counter Claimant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Robert Fritz Green James S. Rubin John Edward Rosenquist Lisa D. Graver Steven H. Sklar Paula Davis Friedman |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Kenneth M Frankel York M Faulkner |
| Beecham Group, p.l.c. Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Kenneth M Frankel York M Faulkner |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Counter Claimant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Robert Fritz Green James S. Rubin John Edward Rosenquist Lisa D. Graver Steven H. Sklar Paula Davis Friedman |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Ford F. Farabow Kenneth M Frankel Richard B Racine Robert D. Bajefsky York M Faulkner |
| Beecham Group, p.l.c. Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Kenneth M Frankel Robert D. Bajefsky York M Faulkner |
| Asahi Glass Co Ltd Counter Claimant |
David C. Bohan Paula Davis Friedman Richard D Kelly Robert E Colletti Steven C Herzog |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Counter Claimant TERMINATED: 05/02/2003 |
Robert Fritz Green James S. Rubin John Edward Rosenquist Lisa D. Graver Steven H. Sklar Paula Davis Friedman |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Ford F. Farabow Kenneth M Frankel Richard B Racine Robert D. Bajefsky York M Faulkner |
| Beecham Group, p.l.c. Counter Defendant |
Richard J. O'Brien Douglas I. Lewis Kenneth M Frankel Robert D. Bajefsky York M Faulkner |
| Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
| 2000-05-11 | 1 | 0 | COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of Douglas I. Lewis, Richard J. O'Brien as attorney(s) for plaintiff (1 original and 1 copy summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (vmj) (Entered: 05/16/2000) | |||
| 2000-05-15 | 2 | 0 | RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to defendant Pentech Phar Inc on 5/12/00. (vmj) (Entered: 05/16/2000) | |||
| 2000-05-22 | 3 | 0 | ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Pentech Phar Inc by Robert F. Green, John Edward Rosenquist, Steven H. Sklar. (vmj) (Entered: 05/23/2000) | |||
| 2000-05-22 | 4 | 0 | ANSWER, affirmative defenses to complaint [1-1] and COUNTERCLAIM; jury demand by Pentech Phar Inc against plaintiff (vmj) (Entered: 05/23/2000) | |||
| 2000-06-02 | 5 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by James S Rubin for defendant Pentech Phar Inc; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 06/09/2000) | |||
| 2000-06-12 | 6 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs to defendants counterclaims [4-2]. (vmj) (Entered: 06/14/2000) | |||
| 2000-06-19 | 7 | 0 | JOINT STATUS REPORT (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 06/27/2000) | |||
| 2000-06-29 | 8 | 0 | MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc for protective order ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 07/06/2000) | |||
| 2000-07-05 | 9 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/5/00 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Defendant's motion for protective order is hereby withdrawn [8-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 07/06/2000) | |||
| 2000-07-14 | 10 | 0 | ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Lisa D. Graver. (kef) (Entered: 07/17/2000) | |||
| 2000-07-17 | 11 | 0 | REFERRAL ORDER of 7/17/00 The case is referred to the Hon. Nan R. Nolan from the Hon. Blanche M. Manning for discovery supervision, settlement conference and any and all nondispositive pretrial motions. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (mbw) (Entered: 07/25/2000) | |||
| 2000-07-20 | 12 | 0 | REFERRAL ORDER of 7/20/00 The case is referred to the Hon. Nan R. Nolan pursuant to Local Rule 72.1 for discovery supervision, settlement conference and any and all nondispositive pretrial motions. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 07/27/2000) | |||
| 2000-07-31 | 13 | 0 | COMBINED MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc for leave to serve additional interrogatories and memorandum in support thereof ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-07-31 | 14 | 0 | MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc for protective order ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-04 | 15 | 0 | JOINT STATUS REPORT (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-04 | 16 | 0 | RESPONSE by defendant to plaintiff's motion to strike; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-04 | 17 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by kenneth M. Frankel for plaintiffs; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Nan R. Nolan on 8/2/00. (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-04 | 18 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by York M. Faulkner for plaintiffs; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Nan R. Nolan on 8/2/00. (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-04 | 19 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 8/4/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendant Pentech's combined motion for leave to serve additional interrogatories is granted [13-1]. By agreement of the parties, each party will be allowed one hundred interrogatories. Plaintiffs' response to defendant Pentech's motion for protective order is due 8/8/00. Parties are to redraft the proposed protective order in accordance with recent case law as stated in open court. Oral argument on Pentech's motion for protective order set for 8/9/00 at 10:30 a.m. The time for the status hearing set for 8/9/00 is reset to 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-08 | 20 | 0 | RESPONSE by plaintiff SB to Pentech's motion for protective order [14-1] (Attachment). (vmj) (Entered: 08/09/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-10 | 21 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 8/2/00 Before Honorable Magistrate Judge Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 08/11/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-09 | 22 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 8/9/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : Status hearing held and continued to 09/26/00 at 10:30 a.m. Parties reported agreement regarding protective order. Defendant's motion for protective order [14-1] is denied as moot. Parties to re-submit draft protective order. No notice (hp) (Entered: 08/17/2000) | |||
| 2000-08-11 | 23 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 8/11/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : (Entered Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26(c)). Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 08/17/2000) | |||
| 2000-09-22 | 24 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs' to compel production of an unsolicited document (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 09/25/2000) | |||
| 2000-09-22 | 25 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs' to compel production of an unsolicted document ; Memorandum in support; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 10/02/2000) | |||
| 2000-09-28 | 26 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 9/28/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 11/14/00 at 11:00 a.m. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add infringement of another patent is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiffs' amended complaint within 21 days, by 10/19/00. Defendant's response to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of an unsolicited document [24-1], [25-1] due 10/19/00; plaintiffs' reply due 11/2/00; oral argument set for 11/14/00 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 10/02/2000) | |||
| 2000-09-22 | 27 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs' for leave to amend their complaint to add infringement of another patent (Attachments); Notice (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 10/03/2000) | |||
| 2000-10-03 | 28 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 10/3/00 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Pursuant to the 7/14/00 order, plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add infringement of another patent [27-1] shall be heard by Magistrate Judge Nolan. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 10/03/2000) | |||
| 2000-10-19 | 29 | 0 | ANSWER to amended complaint [1-1] and COUNTERCLAIM; jury demand by defendant against plaintiffs'. (vmj) (Entered: 10/23/2000) | |||
| 2000-10-25 | 30 | 0 | MOTION by defendant for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) (Attachment); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 11/02/2000) | |||
| 2000-10-31 | 31 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 10/31/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and to submit an oversized memorandum in support is granted in part as to oversized brief and briefed in part as to motion to compel. All prior brief dates set for pending motions are stricken and reset. Response to defendant's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) and motions to compel production of an unsolicited document [24-1], [25-1] due by 11/17/00; reply due by 11/27/00. Oral argument on pending motions set for 12/4/00 at 11:00 a.m. Status hearing set for 11/14/00 stricken. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 11/02/2000) | |||
| 2000-10-30 | 32 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs' to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and to submit an oversized memorandum ; Notice. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 11/02/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-02 | 33 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs to defendant's counterclaim [29-2]. (vmj) (Entered: 11/03/2000) | |||
| 2000-10-19 | 34 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel production of an unsolicited document [24-1] [25-1]. (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 11/03/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-17 | 35 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs 1. replying in support of its motion to compel production of an unsolicited document [24-1], and 2. opposing defendant's motion for a protective order (with exhibits thereto and declaration concerning confidential information submitted therewith) (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 11/20/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-17 | 36 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Pentech Phar Inc to submit an oversized memorandum ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 11/22/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-21 | 37 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/21/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendant's motion for leave to submit an oversized memorandum is granted [36-1]. Telephoned notice (vmj) (Entered: 11/22/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-21 | 38 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of Pentech's R&D [32-1] and in support of defendant's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) [30-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 11/22/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-21 | 39 | 0 | AGREED MOTION by parites for reassignment of civil action no. 00C5831 to judge Blanche M. Manning ; Memorandum in support. (cem) Modified on 11/27/2000 (Entered: 11/27/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-21 | 40 | 0 | EXHIBITS by parties to memorandum in support of their agreed motion for reassignment of civil action no. 00C5831 to judge Blanche M. Manning [39-1] (Attachments). (cem) Modified on 11/27/2000 (Entered: 11/27/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-27 | 41 | 0 | EXHIBITS by plaintiffs' Omnibus reply memorandum supporting their (1) motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and (2) motion to compel production of an unsolicited document, and (3) opposing defendant's motion for a protective order AND Plaintiffs' Onmibus repoly memorandum supporting their (1) motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and (2) motion to compel production of an unsolicted document, and (3) opposing defendant's motion for a protective order (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 11/28/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-27 | 42 | 0 | REPLY by Pentech Phar Inc in support of its opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and in support of defendant's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4)(with accompanying exhibits and declaration concerning confidential information) [38-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 11/29/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-28 | 43 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/28/00 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning : Agreed motion for reassignment of civil action no. 00C5831 to judge Blanche M. Manning is granted [39-1]. The reassigned case 00 C 5831 is referred to Magistrate Judge Nolan for discovery supervision, any and all nondispositive pretrial motions, as well as settlement discussions. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 11/30/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-29 | 44 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to 1. reject defendants attempt to disqualify plaintiffsl technical consultant , and 2) permit disclosure under the protective order and memorandum in support of that motion ; Notice. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 12/06/2000) | |||
| 2000-11-27 | 45 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file a memorandum in excess of 15 pages ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/06/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-04 | 46 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/4/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 1/22/01 at 11:00 a.m. Oral argument held on 1. plaintiff's motion to compel production of an unsolicited document; 2. plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and 3. defendant's motion for protective order under Rule 26(c)(4). Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a memorandum in excess of 15 pages is granted [45-1]. Defendant's response to plaintiffs' motion to (1) reject defendants attempt to disqualify plaintiffs' technical consultant [44-1] and (2) permit disclosure under the protective order [44-2] is due 12/27/00; plaintiffs reply due 1/9/01. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/06/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-04 | 47 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/4/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendant's oral motion to close the courtroom with respect to hearing held on 12/4/00 for anyone who is not under the protective order or is not an employee of Pentech and to seal the transcript of the proceeding is granted. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/08/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-01 | 48 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs' for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/08/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-01 | 49 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant [48-1] and exhibits to motion (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 12/08/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-07 | 50 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/7/00 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Status hearing reset to 2/9/01 at 10:00 a.m. On plaintiffs' motion for leave amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant [48-1]; response by 1/5/01. Reply by 1/10/01. Ruling by mail. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/08/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-07 | 51 | 0 | MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc to obtain a transcript of the hearing held 12/4/00 ; Notice (rmm) (Entered: 12/12/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-11 | 52 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/11/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : Defendant Pentech's motion to obtain a transcript of the hearing held 12/4/00 is granted [51-1]. Mailed notice (rmm) (Entered: 12/12/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-18 | 53 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to obtain a transcript of the hearing held 12/4/00 ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/20/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-19 | 54 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/19/00 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' motion to obtain a transcript of the hearing held 12/4/00 is granted [53-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/20/2000) | |||
| 2000-12-28 | 55 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to (1) reject defendants attempt to disqualify plaintiffs technical consultant, and (2) permit disclosure under the protective order [44-1] [44-2] (Attachments) (1 vol.) (ar) (Entered: 12/29/2000) | |||
| 2001-01-02 | 56 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/2/01 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Status hearing reset to 2/9/01 at 10:00 a.m. On plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant [48-1], response by 1/5/01. Reply by 1/19/01. Ruling by mail. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 01/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-05 | 57 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint and to add Asahi Glass as a defendant [48-1]; Exhibits to memorandum in opposition. (vmj) (Entered: 01/08/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-09 | 58 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs' in support of their motion to (1) reject defendants attempt to disqualify plaintiffs' technical consultant [44-1], and (2) permit disclosure under the protective order [44-2] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 01/10/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-11 | 59 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/11/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of an unsolicited document is granted [24-1]. Defendant's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) is granted in part and denied in part [30-1] and plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D is granted in part and denied in part [32-1]. [Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order] Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 01/12/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-11 | 60 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/11/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Enter sealed version of memorandum opinion and order dated 1/11/01 discusiing in detail confidential material subject to the protective order. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 01/16/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-11 | 61 | 0 | Document Sealed (Memorandum Opinion and Order) RESTRICTED (vmj) (Entered: 01/16/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-19 | 62 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant [48-1] (RESTRICTED). (maf) (Entered: 01/22/2001) | |||
| 2001-01-24 | 63 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant [48-1] (Attachments). (maf) (Entered: 01/25/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-13 | 64 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Robert D. Bajefsky for plaintiff Smithkline Beecham; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) Modified on 02/14/2001 (Entered: 02/14/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-13 | 65 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Ford F. Farabow for plaintiff Smithkline Beecham ; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 02/14/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-13 | 66 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Richard B. Racine for plaintiff Smithkline Beecham; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 02/14/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-16 | 67 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/16/01 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Status hearing held and continued to 5/11/01 at 10:00 a.m. Joint oral motion to consolidate this case for all purposes with 00 C 5831 is granted. Said case is referred to Magistrate Judge Nolan for discovery supervision, all nondispositive pretrial motions as well as settlement discussions. Mailed notice Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 02/20/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-16 | 68 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/16/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: SmithKline's motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant is granted [48-1]. The court grants SmithKline leave to file a second amended complaint consistent with this opinion on or before 2/23/01. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 02/20/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-21 | 69 | 0 | MOTION by defendant for leave to file a motion for summary judgment on U.S. Patent 6,080,759 ; Notice. (mw) (Entered: 02/28/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-27 | 70 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/27/01 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning : Pentech's motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment on U.S. Patent 6,080,759 is granted [69-1]. Motion and opening brief to be served by 03/27/01. Response to be served by 04/24/01. Reply to be served by 05/08/01. Fully briefed motion to be filed by 05/09/1/ Counsel is reminded that any matters which are under seal must be included in a sealed supplement to a public filing. Mailed notice (mw) (Entered: 02/28/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-23 | 71 | 0 | UNCONTESTED MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to amend complaint in civil action no 00 C 5831 to add Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. as a defendant (Attachments); Notice. (cem) (Entered: 03/05/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-28 | 72 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/28/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' uncontested motion for leave to amend complaint in civil action no 00 C 5831 to Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. as a defendant [71-1] is granted. Status hearing held and continued to 3/28/01 at 10:30 am . No notice (cem) (Entered: 03/05/2001) | |||
| 2001-02-28 | 73 | 0 | AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiffs; adding Asahi Glass Co Ltd (Attachments). (maf) (Entered: 03/12/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-15 | 74 | 0 | ANSWER and affirmative defenses to complaint [73-1] and COUNTERCLAIM by defendant Pentech Phar Inc against Smithkline Beecham, Beecham Grp. (vmj) (Entered: 03/19/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-14 | 75 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Pentech Phar Inc for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) (Attachments); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 03/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-20 | 76 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 1/29/01 Before Honorable Magistrate Judge Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 03/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-20 | 77 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 3/20/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals' motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) is withdrawn [75-1] because of agreement between the parties. Status hearing set for 3/28/01 is reset to 4/4/01 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-19 | 78 | 0 | OPPOSITION by plaintiff Smithkline Beecham to Pentech's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4) [75-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 03/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-21 | 79 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 1/21/01 Before Honorable Magistrate Judge Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 03/23/2001) | |||
| 2001-03-22 | 80 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 3/22/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: (Consolidated for all purposes with 00 C 5831) (Entered Agreed Order with respect to discovery by plaintiffs of third-party contractors of Pentech). Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 03/26/2001) | |||
| 2001-04-02 | 81 | 0 | RETURN RECEIPT for International Mail, registered mailed to Asahi Glass Company, Limited, in Tokyo, Japan. (vmj) (Entered: 04/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-04-06 | 82 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 2/28/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan (vmj) (Entered: 04/09/2001) | |||
| 2001-04-10 | 83 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/10/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' motion to reject defendants attempt to disqualify plaintiffs' technical consultant [44-1] and permit disclosure under the protective order [44-2] is granted. (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/11/2001) | |||
| 2001-04-11 | 84 | 0 | ANSWER and affirmative defenses to complaint [73-1] and COUNTERCLAIM; jury demand by defendants against Smithkline Beecham, Beecham Grp plc. (vmj) (Entered: 04/12/2001) | |||
| 2001-04-16 | 85 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 3/20/01 Before Honorable Nan R Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 04/19/2001) | |||
| 2001-04-17 | 86 | 0 | ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd by Robert F. Green, John Edward Rosenquist, Steven H. Sklar, Lisa D. Graver (vmj) (Entered: 04/19/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-01 | 87 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs' to defendant Asahi Glass' counterclaims [84-2]. (vmj) (Entered: 05/02/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-01 | 88 | 0 | AGREED MOTION for modification of the protective order ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 05/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-02 | 89 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/2/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 5/16/01 at 10:30 a.m. Joint agreed motion for modification of the protective order is granted [88-1]. (Entered Amended Protective Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 05/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-04 | 90 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/4/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: (Entered Amended Agreed Order with respect to discovery by plaintiffs of third-party contractors of Pentech) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 05/07/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-09 | 91 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Pentech Phar Inc for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) ; Memorandum in support (RESTRICTED)(vmj) Modified on 05/11/2001 (Entered: 05/11/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-09 | 92 | 0 | OPPOSITION by Smithkline Beecham to Pentech's motion for summary judgment [91-1] and SB's response to Pentech statement of uncontested material facts and statement of additional facts requiring denial of summary judgment (with accompanying Exhibits) (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/11/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-09 | 93 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by Pentech Phar Inc in support of its motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) (with accompanying exhibits), and Pentech's response to SB's statement of additional facts [91-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/11/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 94 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Pentech Phar Inc for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) (Non Confidential Public Version). (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 95 | 0 | EXHIBITS by Pentech Phar Inc to memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Ci.P.56(c) (Non Confidential Public Version) (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 96 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by defendant Pentech Phar Inc in support of its motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) [94-1] (Attachments) (Non Confidential Public Version). (vmj) Modified on 05/31/2001 (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 97 | 0 | STATEMENT by Pentech Phar Inc of uncontested material facts pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) (Attachments) (Non-Confidential Public Version). (vmj) Modified on 05/31/2001 (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 98 | 0 | RESPONSE by Pentech Phar Inc to SB's statement of additional facts. (Non-Confidential Public Version) (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 99 | 0 | OPPOSITION by Smithkline Beecham to Pentech's motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) [94-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 100 | 0 | RESPONSE by Smithkline Beecham to Pentech's statement of uncontested material facts and statement of additional facts requiring denial of summary judgment. (Non-Confidential Public Version) (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-15 | 101 | 0 | EXHIBITS by Smithkline Beecham accompanying SB's response to Pentech's statement of uncontested material fats and statement of additional facts requiring denial of summary judgment (Attachments) (Non-confidential public version) (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-05-31 | 102 | 0 | NOTICE by Sidley & Austin of change of firm name to Sidley Austin Brown & Wood. (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/2001) | |||
| 2001-06-01 | 103 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/1/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Telephonic conference held. (Entered Order Regarding the Disposition of Paroxetine Hydrochloride held by Oread) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-06-12 | 104 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 4/4/01 Before Honorable Nan R Nolan, Magistrate Judge. (vmj) (Entered: 06/13/2001) | |||
| 2001-06-14 | 105 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 5/21/01 and 5/24/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan (2 vols. 105-1, 105-2) (vmj) (Entered: 06/15/2001) | |||
| 2001-06-14 | 106 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/14/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 9:00 a.m. on 7/11/01. Discovery to proceed as stated in open court. Briefing on privilege issues and matters beyond the scope of discovery to proceed as follows: Simultaneous opening briefs to be filed by 6/25/01; Simultaneous responses to be filed by 7/10/01; Simultaneous replies to be filed by 7/17/01. Joint oral motion to seal tape and transcript of today's proceedings is granted. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendants are granted leave to obtain a copy of said transcript. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 06/18/2001) | |||
| 2001-06-22 | 107 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Briefing schedule set on 6/14/01 is hereby modified. Briefing on issues relating to claims of attorney-client privilege, work product immunity and that discovery sought from third parties is beyond the scope of discovery shall proceed as follows: simultaneous opening briefs to be filed by 7/2/01; simultaneous responses to be filed by 7/17/01 and simultaneous replies to be filed by 7/24/01. (Entered Agreed Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/26/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-02 | 108 | 0 | MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc to compel production of documents previously produced in the Apotex litigation (Attachment); Memorandum in support (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-02 | 109 | 0 | EXHIBITS by Pentech Phar Inc to memorandum in support motion to compel production of documents previously produced in the Apotex litigation [108-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-02 | 110 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 4/1/99) (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-02 | 111 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 4/1/99)(RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-09 | 112 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 4/18/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan (las) (Entered: 07/10/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-13 | 113 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/13/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Upon the court's signing of this order, SB agrees that it will produce the Apotex Litigation Documents. Defendant Pentech's motion to compel production of documents previously produced in the Apotex litigation [108-1] is deemed moot and withdrawn. (Entered Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) Modified on 07/16/2001 (Entered: 07/16/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-16 | 114 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 2/11/99 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 07/17/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-19 | 115 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 06/14/01 before the Honorable Nan R. Nolan (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 07/19/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-17 | 116 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendants in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel producton of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds (Attachment). (lc) (Entered: 07/20/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-17 | 117 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in opposition to motion to compel production of communications for which defendnts assert attorney-client privilege or work product immunity. (fce) (Entered: 07/20/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-24 | 118 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs in support of their motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/25/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-24 | 119 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs in support of their motion to compel production of communications for which defendants assert attorney-client privilege or work product immunity (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/25/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-26 | 120 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/26/01 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a surreply memorandum in support of SB's opposition to Pentech's motion for summary judgment is granted. Pentech may file a 3 page reply to the surreply by 8/7/01. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 07/27/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-23 | 121 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file a surreply memorandum in support of their opposition to Pentech's motion for summary judgment (Exhibits); Notice. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) Modified on 08/09/2001 (Entered: 08/09/2001) | |||
| 2001-08-07 | 122 | 0 | REPLY by Pentech Phar Inc to Smithkline's surreply memorndum in support of its opposition to Pentech's motion for motion for summary judgment [121-1] of noninfringement (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 08/09/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-20 | 123 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of their motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 08/14/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-20 | 124 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of plaintiffs' motion to compel production of communications for which defendants assert attorney-client privilege or work product immunity (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 08/14/2001) | |||
| 2001-08-15 | 125 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 7/11/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 08/15/2001) | |||
| 2001-08-14 | 126 | 0 | REPLY by Pentech Phar Inc to "SB's surreply memorandum in support of its opposition to Pentech's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement". (non-confidential public version) (vmj) Modified on 08/16/2001 (Entered: 08/16/2001) | |||
| 2001-08-23 | 127 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 8/23/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : Status hearing held and continued to 9:00 a.m. on 09/20/01. Parties are directed to submit agreed order regarding today's proceedings. Joint oral motion to seal tape and transcript of today's proceedings is granted. Counsel for plaintiffs' and defendants are granted leave to obtain a copy of said transcript. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 08/29/2001) | |||
| 2001-08-28 | 128 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 8/28/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : 1) Fact discovery will close on 12/15/01 ; expert reports are due 01/22/02; responding expert reports are due 02/27/02; reply expert reports are due 03/25/02; all expert depositions are to be completed by 05/16/02. 2) the 30-month stay in case 00 C 2855 is extended to 12/02/02. 3) The transcript of the proceedings held 08/23/01 is to be unsealed for the limited purpose of making the transcript available to the parties. (Stipulated Order). Mailed notice by judge's staff (tlm) (Entered: 08/29/2001) | |||
| 2001-07-17 | 129 | 0 | EXHIBITS by Pentech Phar Inc to memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 08/31/2001) | |||
| 2001-09-20 | 130 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 9/20/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 10/26/01 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds is granted. Defendant to provide revised logs by 10/4/01. Plalintiff to notify the court by 10/15/01 if there are any disputes regarding revised logs. (Entered Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 09/24/2001) | |||
| 2001-09-21 | 131 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 9/21/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Order dated 9/20/01 is stricken [130-1]. Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds is granted. (Entered Amended Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 09/24/2001) | |||
| 2001-09-20 | 132 | 0 | MOTION by defendants for leave to file a motion for summary judgment on the "Sixth count for patent infringement" in plaintiffs' amended complaint" in civil action nos. 00C2855 and 00C5831 ; Notice of motion (eav) (Entered: 10/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-10-02 | 133 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 10/2/01 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning : Defendant's motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment on the sixth count for Pantech Infringement" in plaintiffs' amended complaint in civil action 00C2855 and 00C5831 by 11/29/01 is granted. [132-1] Opening brief to be served by 10/23/01. Response to be served by 11/13/01. Reply to be served by 11/27/01. The motion and all briefs shall then be filed on 11/29/01. Ruling by mail. Mailed notice (eav) (Entered: 10/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-10-04 | 134 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 10/4/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : By agreement of the parties, defendant granted an extension of time to 10/9/01 to provide revised logs. Plaintiff to notify the court by 10/26/01 if there are any disputes regarding the revised logs. Status hearing before Magistrate Judge Nolan set for 10/26/01 at 9:30 a.m. to stand. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 10/05/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-05 | 135 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/5/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of communications for which defendants assert attorney-client privilege or work product immunity is granted in part and denied in part. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. Mailed notice by judge's staff (jmp) (Entered: 11/06/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-20 | 136 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 9/20/01 and 10/26/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan (2 vols: 136-1, 136-2) (vmj) (Entered: 11/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-27 | 137 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 7/11/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 11/27/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 138 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in supporting their motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 12/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 139 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff supporting their motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 12/03/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 140 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 141 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-30 | 142 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/30/01 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 1/18/02 at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons stated in open court, documents AS 1-5 and AS 7-10 may be withheld as they are subject to attorney-client privilege. By agreement of the parties, the 30 month stay in case No. 00 C 5831 is extended to 3/3/03. By agreement of the parties, defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine [140-1] is due 12/14/01; plaintiff's reply due 12/21/01. By agreement of the parties, defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity [141-1] is due 12/21/01; plaintiffs' reply is due 1/9/02. Motion hearing date of 12/4/01 is stricken. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 143 | 0 | MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc for summary judgment ; Memorandum in support with Exhibits; Statement of uncontested material facts pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) (RESTRICTED). (vmj) Modified on 12/04/2001 (Entered: 12/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 144 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by Pentech Phar Inc in support of their motion for summary judgment [143-1], exhibits, statement in response to Smithkline's additional facts (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-11-29 | 145 | 0 | OPPOSITION by Smithkline Beecham in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment [143-1]; Response to defendants' statement of uncontested material facts and statement of additional facts (REsTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/2001) | |||
| 2001-12-14 | 146 | 0 | RESPONSE by Pentech Phar Inc to Smithkline Beecham's motion to modify 1/11/01 protective order [88-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 12/17/2001) | |||
| 2001-12-10 | 147 | 0 | ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Pentech Phar Inc by Edgar H Haug, Jeffrey A Hovden, Robert E Colletti. (vmj) (Entered: 12/18/2001) | |||
| 2001-12-20 | 148 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Jeffrey Hovden for defendant Pentech Phar Inc; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) Modified on 12/21/2001 (Entered: 12/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-12-20 | 149 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Edgar H. Haug for defendant Pentech Phar Inc ; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 12/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-12-11 | 150 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Robert E. Colletti for defendant Pentech Phar Inc ; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 12/21/2001) | |||
| 2001-12-21 | 151 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd, in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity [141-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 12/26/2001) | |||
| 2002-01-09 | 152 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs supporting their motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity [141-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 01/10/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-10 | 153 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 1/3/01, 5/2/01, 6/1/01, 9/28/01 and 11/30/01 before Honorable Nan R. Nolan [5 vols: 153-1 through 153-5]. (vmj) (Entered: 01/10/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-14 | 154 | 0 | Document Sealed until further order of courtt, minute order of 1/14/02. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 01/15/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-14 | 155 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order 01/14/02) [154-1] (RESTRICTED). (hp) (Entered: 01/15/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-14 | 156 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/14/02 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Defendant Pentech's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part [143-1]. Specifically, the portion of Pentech's motion which asserts that claims 6-9 of SB's '759 patent are invalid for same invention double patenting over SB's '423 patent is granted, and the portion of Pentech's motion which asserts that clalims 10-18 of the '759 patent would not be infringed by its proposed method of pharmaceutical product manufacturing is denied. (Entered Memorandum and Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 01/15/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-18 | 157 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs supporting their motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity [141-1] (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 01/22/2002) | |||
| 2001-12-21 | 158 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs' supporting their motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine [140-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 01/22/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-18 | 159 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/18/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 1/30/02 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity is granted in part and denied in part [141-1]. Defendant Asahi is to produce to plaintiffs documents as ordered within seven days. In addition to the 1/30/02 status hearing noted above, the court also sets a status hearing for 2/22/02 at 9:00 a.m (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 01/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-30 | 160 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/30/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : Status hearing held and continued to 2/22/02 at 9:00 a.m. Hearing held on plaintiffs' motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine; ruling will be by mail. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 02/01/2002) | |||
| 2002-01-31 | 161 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/31/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine is granted in part and denied in part [140-1]. (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) Modified on 02/01/2002 (Entered: 02/01/2002) | |||
| 2002-02-22 | 162 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/22/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 3/12/02 at 9:30 a.m. Simultaneous briefs related to the stay issue are due on 3/4/02. Joint oral motion to seal tape and transcript of today's proceedings is granted. The transcript is to be unsealed for the limited purpose of making the transcript available to the parties, for the plaintiffs, York Faulkner and Kenneth Frankel of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunner, LLP and Douglas Lewis of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, and for the defendants, John Rosenquist, Robert Green and Steven Sklar of Leydig, Voit and Mayer, Ltd. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 02/25/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-05 | 163 | 0 | BRIEF on the case law regarding evidence relevant to patent infringement based on submission of an ANDA by plaintiff Smithkline Beecham (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 03/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-05 | 164 | 0 | BENCH MEMORANDUM by defendants regarding the scope of evidence relevant to the issue of infringement in "ANDA" actions under 35 USC 271(e)(2)(A); Exhibits in support (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 03/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-07 | 165 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 1/18/02 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 03/08/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-08 | 166 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Smithkline Beecham in support of its proposal for a three month interim extension of fact discovery (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 03/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-08 | 167 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Smithkline Beecham for the 3/12/02 status conference on facts establishing the relevance of new batches of Pentech's product (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 03/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-12 | 168 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 3/12/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 4/23/02 at 1:00 p.m. Plaintiffs' oral motion to extend the 30 month stay is denied at this time. By agreement of the parties, discovery schedule amended as follows: Fact discovery cutoff 6/14/02. Affirmative expert reports 7/15/02. Responsive expert reports 8/15/02. Reply expert reports 9/16/02. All expert depositions 11/11/02. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-29 | 169 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees (Attachment); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 04/08/2002) | |||
| 2002-03-29 | 170 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in support of their` motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [169-1]; Exhibits (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 04/08/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-04 | 171 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/4/02 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees should have been noticed before Magistrate Judge Nolan. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/08/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-03 | 172 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/3/02 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Asahi and Pentech's motion for summary judgment is denied. To preserve the confidentiality of certain information, the court has prepared a public memorandum as well as a sealed version containing proprietary materials. Sentences in the sealed version which differ from the public version have been italicized. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order (Under Seal) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/10/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-09 | 173 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/9/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: By agreement of the parties, defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [169-1] is due 4/29/02; plaintiffs' reply is due 5/13/02. Status hearing set for 4/23/02 at 1:00 p.m. to stand. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/10/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-16 | 174 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 2/22/02 Before Honorable Non R. Nolan (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 04/19/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-19 | 175 | 0 | MOTION by Pentech Phar Inc to compel plaintiffs to produce documents and/or things in response to Pentech's request No. 247 ; Memorandum in support (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-19 | 176 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion to compel Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 MG dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's ANDA capsules; Exhibits to SB's memorandum in support (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 04/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-23 | 177 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 1/30/02 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 04/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-23 | 178 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/23/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 6/4/02 at 1:00 p.m. By agreement of the parties, plaintiffs' response to defendant Pentech's motion to compel plaintiff to produce documents and/or things in response to Pentech's request No. 247 [175-1] is due 5/13/02; Pentech's reply is due 5/28/02. By agreement of the parties, defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to compel Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 mg Dosage Capsules Made With the Same Formulation as Pentech's ANDA Capsules is due 5/13/02; plaintiffs' reply is due 5/28/02. (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/29/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-26 | 179 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/26/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: By agreement of the parties, defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [169-1] is now due 5/10/02; plaintiffs' reply is now due 5/29/02. By agreement of the parties, plaintiffs' reply in support of its motion to compel production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 mg dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's ANDA capsules is now due 5/31/02. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/29/2002) | |||
| 2002-04-29 | 180 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/29/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: At the parties' request, the tape and transcript of the proceedings held 4/23/02 before Magistrate Judge Nolan are sealed. The transcript is to be unsealed for the limited purpose of making the transcript available to the parties, for the plaintiffs, York Faulkner and Kenneth Frankel of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunner, LLP and Douglas Lewis of Sidley Austin Brown and Wood, and for the defendants, John Rosenquist, Robert Green, Jamison Lynch and Steven Sklar of Leydig, Voit and Mayer, Ltd. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/30/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-01 | 181 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 8/2/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 05/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-03 | 182 | 0 | ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Pentech Phar Inc, Asahi Glass Co Ltd by Jamison E. Lynch. (vmj) (Entered: 05/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 183 | 0 | ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiffs by Jason R. Buratti, Courtney B. Meeker and Scott J. Popma. (vmj) (Entered: 05/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 184 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Pentech Phar Inc to submit an oversized memorandum ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 05/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 185 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd to submit an oversized memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 05/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 186 | 0 | EXHIBITS in support of defendant Pentech Phar Inc.'s opposition to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend this complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees. (vmj) (Entered: 05/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 187 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/10/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: (Entered Agreed Order pertaining to the inspection in Japan of certain equipment and certain samples of materials in their storage locations at faciilities of Defendant Asahi Glass co., Ltd.) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 05/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-13 | 188 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/13/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: On the court's own motion, the time for the status hearing set for 6/4/02 is reset to 12:30 p.m. Defendnat Pentech's motion to submit an oversized memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees is granted [184-1]. Defendant Asahi's motion to submit an oversized memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees is granted [185-1]. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 05/14/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 189 | 0 | OPPOSITION by defendant Pentech Phar Inc to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [169-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/14/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-10 | 190 | 0 | OPPOSITION by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [169-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/14/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-13 | 191 | 0 | OPPOSITION by plaintiff Smithkline Beecham motion to Pentech's motion to compel plaintiffs to produce documents and/or things in response to Pentech's request No. 247 [175-1]; Exhibits (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/14/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-13 | 192 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to Smithkline's motion to compel Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 MG dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's Anda Capsules (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 05/14/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-14 | 193 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 4/23/02 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) Modified on 05/15/2002 (Entered: 05/15/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-15 | 194 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/15/02 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Telephone conference held. Plaintiffs' oral motion to compel is denied for the reasons stated on the record. Telephoned notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-17 | 195 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice for plaintiffs Smithkline Beecham, Beecham Grp plc by Courtney Beth Meeker; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 05/21/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-17 | 196 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice for plaintiffs by Scott J. Popma; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 05/21/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-20 | 197 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice for plaintiff by Jason R. Buratti; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 05/22/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-28 | 198 | 0 | MEMORANDUM in REPLY by defendant Pentech to Pentech's motion to compel plaintiffs to produce the documents and/or things sought by Pentech's request No. 247 [191-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/29/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-29 | 199 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs in suport of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [169-1]; Exhibits to reply (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/30/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-30 | 200 | 0 | REPLY supporting their motion to compel Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 MG dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's Anda capsules by plaintiff (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 05/31/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-31 | 201 | 0 | EXHIBITS by plaintiffs to their memorandum in support of their motion for a protective order for deposition of plaintiffs' in-house counsel, Charles M. Kinzig, ESQ. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) Modified on 11/6/2008 (smm). (Entered: 06/04/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-04 | 202 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion to close fact discovery and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech; Exhibit to memorandum (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 06/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-11 | 203 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/11/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: At the parties' request, the digital recording and transcript of the proceedings held 6/10/02 before Magistrate Judge Nolan are sealed. The transcipt is to be unsealed for the limited purpose of making the transcript available to the parties, for the plaintiffs, York Faulkner and Kenneth Frankel of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunner, LLP and Douglas Lewis of Sidley Austin Brown and Wood, and for the defendants, John Rosenquist, Robert Green, Jamison Lynch, and Steven Sklar of Leydig, Voit and Mayer, Ltd. and Frommer, Lawrence & Haug, L.L.P. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-07 | 204 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion for a protective order concerning rule 30(b)(6) depositions noticed by defendants with Exhibits (RESTRICTED). (ntf) Modified on 06/12/2002 (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-05-31 | 205 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff for protective order for deposition of plaintiffs' in-house counsel, Charles M. Kinzig, Esq. ; Memorandum in support; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-04 | 206 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to close fact discovery and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-07 | 207 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs' for a protective order concerning Rule 30(b)(6) depositions noticed by defendants ; Memorandum in support; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-07 | 208 | 0 | EXHIBITS by plaintiff to motion for a protective order concerning Rule 30(b)(6) depositions noticed by defendants [207-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-10 | 209 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/10/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Answer brief to plaintiffs motion to close fact discovery [206-1] and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech [206-2] due 6/20/02. Reply to answer brief due 6/28/02. Ruling set for 7/22/02 at 1:00 p.m. Status hearing held and continued to 7/22/02 at 1:00 p.m. At the parties' joint request, discovery schedule is amended as follows. Affirmative expert reports 8/16/02. Responsive expert reports 10/18/02. Reply expert reports 12/20/02. All expert depositions will be taken by and all experts will be completed by 2/28/02. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-10 | 210 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/10/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Answer brief to plaintiffs' motion for protective order for deposition of plaintiffs' in-house counsel, Charles M. Kinzig, Esq. [205-1] due 6/20/02. Reply to answer brief due 6/28/02. Plaintiffs motion for a protective order concerning Rule 30(b)(6) depositions noticed by defendants is granted in part and denied in part [207-1] as stated in open court. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-12 | 211 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/12/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees is denied [169-1]. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-12 | 212 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/12/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendant Pentech's motion to compel plaintiffs to produce the documents and/or things sought by Pentech's request no. 247 is denied [175-1] without prejudice. (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-12 | 213 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/12/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 mg dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's ANDA Capsules is granted. (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 06/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-20 | 214 | 0 | OPPOSITION by defendants to plaintiffs' motion for a protective order for deposition of Charles M. Kinzig and exhibits in support [205-1]. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) Modified on 06/24/2002 (Entered: 06/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-20 | 215 | 0 | OPPOSITION by Pentech to Smithkline's motion to close fact discovery [206-1] and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech and exhibits in support [206-2] (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 06/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-21 | 216 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 5/15/02 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 06/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 217 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs' in support of their motion to close fact discovery [206-1] and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech [206-2] (Exhibits) (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/01/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 218 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs' to defendants' opposition to plaintiffs' motion for a protective order for deposition of plaintiffs' in-house counsel, Charles M. Kinzig, Esq. [214-1] (Attachment). (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 219 | 0 | NOTICE of filing by defendant of documents filed under seal (Attachment). (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-01 | 220 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/1/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Counsel were ordered in open court to submit redacted versions of all pleadings that have previously been filed under seal in this case in order that the redacted versions of the pleadings could be made publicly available. On 6/28/02, counsel submitted these redacted versions to the Clerk's office with a Notice of Filing identifying the docket entry number of the previously filed under seal versions. The clerk is directed to treat these redacted versions as they would any other document accepted for public filing in the normal course of business. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 221 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in support of their motion to compel production of an unsolicited document; Exhibits to motion (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 222 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add infringement of another patent (Attachments); Exhibits to motion (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 223 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D [32-1]; Exhibits to motion (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 224 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of an unsolicited document [24-1]; Exhibits to motion (redacted public version) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 225 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and in support of defendant's motion for a protctive order under Rule 26(c)(4); Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 226 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff 1) reply in support of its motion to compel production of an unsolicited document, and 2) opposing defendant's motion for a protective order; Exhibits; Declaration (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 227 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs supporting their 1) motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and 2) motion to compel production of an unsolicited document, and 3) opposing defendant's motion for a protective order; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 228 | 0 | REPLY by Pentech Phar Inc in support of its opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel defendant to provide discovery about its R&D and in support of defendant's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c)(4); Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 229 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion to 1) reject defendant's attempt to disqualify plaintiffs' technical consultant, and 2) permit disclosure under the protective order; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 230 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. as a defendant [71-1]; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION). (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 231 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add Asahi Glass as a defendant (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 232 | 0 | EXHIBITS by Pentech Phar Inc to memorandum in support of motion to compel production of documents previously produced in the Apotex litigation (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 233 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds (Attachment) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 234 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs' supporting their motion to compel production of documents from third parties that defendant Pentech is blocking on relevance grounds; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 235 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs' in support of their motion to compel production of communications for which defendants assert attorney-client privilege or work product immunity; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 236 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff Smithkline Beecham for leave to file a surreply memorandum in support of SB's opposition to Pentech's motion for summary judgment ; SB's surreply memorandum in support of its opposition to Pentech's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 237 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs supporting motion to compel production of communications for which defendants assert attorney-client privilege or work product immunity; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 238 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs supporting their motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 239 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of their motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) [94-1]; Statement of uncontested material facts pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 240 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by defendant in support of their motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) [94-1] (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 241 | 0 | OPPOSITION by Smithkline Beecham to defendants' motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.56(c) [94-1] (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 242 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendants in support of their opposition to plaintiffs' motion to modify the 1/11/01 order (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 243 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Asahi Glass Co Ltd in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 244 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiff supporting their motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity; Declaration (Attorney) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 245 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs' supporting their motion to compel production of additional communications for which defendant Asahi asserts attorney-client privilege or work product immunity; Declaration (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 246 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs supporting their motion to modify 1/11/01 order to permit discovery of defendants' business relationships concerning paroxetine; Declaration (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 247 | 0 | BRIEF on the case law regarding evidence relevant to patent infringement based on submission of an ANDA by plaintiff; Declaration (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 248 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendants' Bench regarding the scope of evidence relevant to the issue of infringement in "ANDA" actions under 35 USC 271(e)(2)(A); Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 249 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Smithkline Beecham in support of its proposal for a three-month intermim extension of fact discovery (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 250 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Smithkline Beecham for 3/12/02 status conference on facts establishing the relevance of new batches of Pentech's produce; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 251 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees (Attachment); Memorandum in support; Exhibits; Declaration (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-02 | 252 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in support of "Pentech's motion to compel plaintiffs to produce documents and/or things in sought by Pentech's request No. 247 [175-1] (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 253 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to compel Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 MG dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's Anda Capsules ; Memorandum in support; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 254 | 0 | OPPOSITION by Pentech Phar Inc to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [251-1]; Declaration (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 255 | 0 | OPPOSITION to defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney fees [251-1]; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 256 | 0 | OPPOSITION by plaintiff to plaintiffs motion to compel plaintiffs to produce documents and/or things sought by Pentech's request No. 247 [175-1]; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 257 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Pentech Phar Inc in opposition to Smithkline's motion to compel production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 MG dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's Anda capsules" (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 258 | 0 | MEMORANDUM IN REPLY by Pentech Phar Inc to SB's opposition to Pentech's "motion to compel plaintiffs to produce the documents and/or things sought by Pentech's request No. 247 (Attachments) (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 259 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs in support of their motion for leave to amend their complaint to deem case exceptional and recover attorney [251-1]; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 260 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs' supporting their motion to compel Pentech's production of x-ray testing and samples of 30 MG dosage capsules made with the same formulation as Pentech's Anda Capsules. (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 261 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of their motion to close fact discovery and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 262 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in support of their motion for a protective order concerning Rule 30(b)(6) depositions noticed by defendants [207-1]; Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-06-28 | 263 | 0 | RESPONSE by SBs to defendants' statement of uncontested material facts and statement of additional facts requiring denial of summary judgment pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(b)(3); Exhibits (REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION) (vmj) (Entered: 07/03/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-11 | 264 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 3/12/02 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan (yap) (Entered: 07/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-22 | 265 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/22/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 9/12/02 at 1:00 p.m. Pentech's New York counsel participated by phone. Plaintiffs' motion for a protective order for deposition of plaintiffs' in-house counsel, Charles M. Kinzig, Esq. [205-1] is continued to 9/12/02 at 9:00 a.m. Ruling on plaintiffs' motion to close fact discovery and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech will be by mail. Any Daubert challenges are to be brought before the court no later than 3/31/03. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 07/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-22 | 266 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/22/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : At the parties' request, the digital recording and transcript of proceedings held on 07/22/02 before Magistrate Judge Nolan are sealed. The transcript is to be unsealed for the limited purpose of making the transcript availabable to the parties: for the plaintiffs, York Faulkner and Kenneth Frankel of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunners, LLP, and Douglas Lewis of Sidley Austin Brown and Wood, for the defendants, John Rosenquist, Robert Green, Jamison Lynch, and Steven Sklar of Leydig, Voit and Mayer, ltd., and Froomer, Lawrence & Haug, LLP. Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 07/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-22 | 267 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 08/09/00 before the Honorable Nan R. Nolan (1 vol.) (ar) (Entered: 07/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-24 | 268 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 8/23/01 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 07/25/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-30 | 269 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/30/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: SmithKline's motion to close fact discovery [206-1] and defer expert discovery pending an election by Pentech [206-2] is denied. The defendants have requested that the court's Memorandum Opinion and Order be sealed pursuant to the Protective Order previously entered in this case. The plaintiffs take no position in the matter. The court agrees that the order reveals non-public confidential information throughout that is likely to result in substantial competitive harm to the defendants and the redaction is not feasible. Therefore, the order is sealed. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 07/31/2002) | |||
| 2002-07-30 | 270 | 0 | MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 07/31/2002) | |||
| 2002-08-02 | 271 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT sealed pursuant to minute order dated 7/22/02 (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 08/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-08-02 | 272 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT sealed pursuant to minute order dated 6/11/02 (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 08/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-08-06 | 273 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order dated 8/23/01 and 8/28/01) (vmj) (Entered: 08/08/2002) | |||
| 2002-08-06 | 274 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 8/23/01 and 8/28/01.) (vmj) (Entered: 08/08/2002) | |||
| 2002-08-12 | 275 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 5/29/02 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 08/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-09-12 | 276 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice for Asahi Glass Co Ltd by Edgar H Haug, Jeffrey A Hovden, Robert E Colletti; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) Modified on 09/16/2002 (Entered: 09/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-09-05 | 277 | 0 | ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Asahi Glass Co Ltd by Edgar H. Haug, Jeffrey A. Hovden and Robert E. Colletti; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 09/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-09-19 | 278 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 9/19/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: At the parties' request, the digital recording and transcript of the proceedings held 9/19/02 before Magistrate Judge Nolan are sealed. The transcript is to be unsealed for the limited purpose of making the transcript available to the parties, for the plaintiffs, York Faulkner and Kenneth Frankel of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunner, LLP and Douglas Lewis of Sidley Austin Brown and Wood, and for the defendants, John Rosenquist, Robert Green, Jamison Lynch, and Steven Sklar of Leydig, Voit and Mayer, Ltd. and Jeffrey A. Hovden and Robert E. Colletti of Frommer, Lawrence & Haug, L.L.P. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 09/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-09-19 | 279 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 9/19/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 11/6/02 at 12:30 p.m. Plaintiffs' motion for protective order for deposition of plaintiffs' in-house counsel, Charles M. Kinzig, Esq. is denied as moot [205-1]. Expert discovery schedule is modified as follows. Affirmative expert reports due by 12/2/02. Responsive expert reports due by 1/17/03. Reply expert reports due by 2/28/03. All expert depositions will be taken by and all expert discovery will be completed by 4/25/03. Any Daubert challenges are to be brought before the court by 5/30/03. (See reverse of minute order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 09/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-10-21 | 280 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 10/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-10-22 | 281 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 10/22/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: By agreement of the parties, defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials [280-1] due 11/1/02; plaintiffs' reply due 11/8/02. Parties need not appear for the 10/23/02 motion call. Status hearing set for 11/6/02 is stricken and reset to 11/19/02 at 12:30 p.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 10/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-10-21 | 282 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order on 5/2/01) 1. plaintiffs' memorandum in support of their motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials 2. exhibits to plaintiffs' memorandum in support. (vmj) (Entered: 10/24/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-01 | 283 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order dated 5/2/01.) (vmj) (Entered: 11/04/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-08 | 284 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs in support of their motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials [280-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 11/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-08 | 285 | 0 | EXHIBITS by plaintiffs' to reply in support of their motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials [284-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 11/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-04 | 286 | 0 | MOTION by Applicants Roger L Longtin, Monica L Thompson, Paula D Friedman for leave to file additional appearances of counsel for defendants Pentech Phar, Inc. and Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 11/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-12 | 287 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/12/02 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning: Roger L. Longtin, Monica L. Thompson and Paula D. Friedman's motion for leave to file additional appearances of counsel for defendants Pentech Phar, Inc. and Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. is granted [286-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 11/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-12 | 288 | 0 | ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Pentech Phar Inc, Pentech Phar Inc, Pentech Phar Inc, Asahi Glass Co Ltd, Pentech Phar Inc, Asahi Glass Co Ltd, Pentech Phar Inc by Roger L. Longtin, Monica L. Thompson, Paula Davis Friedman (vmj) (Entered: 11/13/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-18 | 289 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/18/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Smithkline Beecham's motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials is granted [280-1]. (See reverse of minute order) No notice (vmj) (Entered: 11/21/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-20 | 290 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/20/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Answer brief to plaintiff's motion to extend stay on FDA approval of PenTech's ANDA because the defendants breached their duty to reasonably cooperate in expediting the litigation due 12/20/02. Reply to answer brief due 12/24/02. Ruling set for 2/6/03 at 12:30 p.m. Status hearing held and continued to 12:30 p.m. on 2/6/03. The defendant is to file its motion to amend its answer and defendants' motion to reopen fact discovery by 12/6/02. Plaintiffs' response to said motions is due by 12/31/02. Defendants reply to said motions is due by 1/15/03. Ruling on motions is set for 2/6/03 at 12:30 p.m. Joint oral motion to seal the tape and transcript of today's proceedings is granted. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendants are granted leave to obtain a copy of said transcript. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 11/22/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-25 | 291 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 11/20/02) (vmj) (Entered: 11/26/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-25 | 292 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 9/19/02) (vmj) (Entered: 11/26/2002) | |||
| 2002-11-26 | 293 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 11/26/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: The ruling date on plaintiff's motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of Sampling of Paroxetine Materials [253-1] and defendant's motion to amend answer [251-1] and defendant's motion to reopen fact discovery is reset to 2/11/03 at 12:30 p.m. The ruling date set for 2/6/03 is vacated. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/02/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-05 | 294 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/5/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: The status hearing set for 2/6/03 is stricken and reset for 2/11/03 at 12:30 p.m. Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) Modified on 12/06/2002 (Entered: 12/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-04 | 295 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA, because the defendants breached their duty to reasonably cooperate in expediting the litigation ; Memorandum in support; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-03 | 296 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials [280-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 12/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-03 | 297 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiffs in support of their motion to compel Rule 34 inspections of sampling of paroxetine materials [280-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 12/06/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-06 | 298 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendants in support of defendants' motion to reopen limited fact discovery (RESTRICTED) (vmj) Modified on 12/11/2002 (Entered: 12/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-06 | 299 | 0 | MOTION and memorandum by defendant to amend answer and counterclaim (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 12/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-06 | 300 | 0 | NOTICE of filing by defendants regarding motion to amend answer and counterclaim [299-1] and memorandum in support thereof. (vmj) (Entered: 12/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-06 | 301 | 0 | MOTION by defendants to reopen limited fact discovery ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-06 | 302 | 0 | MOTION by defendant for leave to file oversize brief in support of defendnts' motion to amend answer and counterclaim ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/11/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-10 | 303 | 0 | OPPOSITION by defendants to plaintiffs' motion to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA [295-1] (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 12/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-10 | 304 | 0 | MOTION by defendants for leave to file oversize brief ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-11 | 305 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/11/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendants' motion for leave to file oversize brief is granted [304-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/12/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-13 | 306 | 0 | SUBMISSION of non-confidential version of defendants' memorandum in support of defendants' motion to amend answer and counterclaim by defendants (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 12/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-13 | 307 | 0 | MOTION by defendants to amend the answer and counterclaim (Attachments); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-13 | 308 | 0 | SUBMISSION of non-confidential version of defendants' memorandum in support of defendants' motion to reopen limited fact discovery by defendants (Attachments); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-13 | 309 | 0 | DECLARATION of Jason R. Buratti concerning confidential information designated by SB in defendants' papers associated with defendants' motion to reopen limited fact discovery; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-13 | 310 | 0 | DECLARATION of Jason R. Buratti concerning confidential information designated by SB in defendants' papers associated with defendants' motion to amend answer and counterclaims; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 12/16/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-17 | 311 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 12/17/02 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendants' motion for leave to file oversize brief is granted [302-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/19/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-20 | 312 | 0 | DECLARATION of Jason R. Bruatti, Monica L. Thompson concerning confidential information designated by SB in defendants' opposition to plaintiffs' motion to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's Anda and Associated papers; Notice (312-1 through 312-2). (yp) Modified on 12/23/2002 (Entered: 12/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-20 | 313 | 0 | SUBMISSION of non-confidential by defendant version of defendants' opposition to plaintiffs' motion to extend stay on FDA Approval of Pentech's Anda (Attachments); Notice. (yp) Modified on 12/23/2002 (Entered: 12/23/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-24 | 314 | 0 | REPLY by plaintiff to motion to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA, and accompanying exhibits [295-1]. (RESTRICTED). (jmp) (Entered: 12/26/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-20 | 315 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiff in support of its motion for partial summary judgment (RESTRICTED). (jmp) (Entered: 12/26/2002) | |||
| 2002-12-31 | 316 | 0 | UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiffs to amend the briefing schedule regarding defendants' 1) motion to reopen limited fact discovery and 2) motion to amend answer and counterclaim ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 01/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-07 | 317 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/7/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Plaintiffs' unopposed motion to amend the briefing schedule regarding defendants' 1) motion to reopen limited fact discovery and 2) motion to amend answer and counterclaim is granted [316-1]. Plaintiffs' responses to defendants' above referenced motions are due on or before 1/7/03; defendants replies are due on or before 1/29/03. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 01/08/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-07 | 318 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 5/2/01) (vmj) (Entered: 01/08/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-07 | 319 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 5/2/01) (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 01/08/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-06 | 320 | 0 | MOTION by John E Rosenquist to file under Local Rule 83.17 to withdraw as attorney of record. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 01/13/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-10 | 321 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 1/10/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Defendants' motion to file under Local Rule 83.17 to withdraw John E. Rosenquist as attorneys of record is granted [320-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 01/13/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-29 | 322 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by defendants in support of their motion to reopen limited fact discovery [301-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 01/30/2003) | |||
| 2003-01-30 | 323 | 0 | REPLY by defendants to plaintiffs' opposition to defendants' motion to amend answer and counterclaim. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 01/30/2003) | |||
| 2003-02-10 | 324 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/10/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing set for 2/12/03 is stricken and reset to 2/24/03 at 8:00 a.m. Rulings on defendants' motion to amend the answer and counterclaim [307-1], motion to reopen limited fact discovery [301-1] and plaintiffs' motion to extend stay are continued. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 02/11/2003) | |||
| 2002-11-28 | 325 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA, because the defendants breached their duty to reasonably cooperate in expediting the litigation ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 02/28/2003) | |||
| 2003-02-27 | 326 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 2/27/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: By agreement of plaintiffs SmithKline Beecham Corp and Beecham Group and defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals Inc., the court orders that the stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Section 355(j)(5)(B) is hereby tolled through and including 4/25/03. Plaintiff's motion to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA, because the defendants breached their duty to reasonably cooperate in expediting the litigation [325-1], defendants' motion to reopen limited fact discovery [301-1] and defendants' motion to amend answer and counterclaim [299-1] are entered and continued. Status hearing held and continued to 4/15/03 at 12:30 p.m. (Entered Agreed Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 02/28/2003) | |||
| 2003-03-14 | 327 | 0 | REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 3/14/03 This case is reassigned to the Hon. Richard A. Posner in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13 of the Internal Operating Procedures (For further detail see order) Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/17/2003) | |||
| 2003-03-27 | 328 | 0 | ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant/counter-claimant Asahi Glass Co., LTd. by William T Enos, Richard D. Kelly and David C. Bohan. (vmj) (Entered: 03/31/2003) | |||
| 2003-03-27 | 329 | 0 | APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice for defendant/counter-claimant Asahi Glass Co Ltd by Richard D. Kelly; Order entered granting leave by Hon. Blanche M. Manning. (vmj) (Entered: 03/31/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-10 | 330 | 0 | MOTION under Local Rule 83.17 by Law Firms Piper Rudnick and Frommer Lawrence & Haug, to withdraw as attorneys of record on behalf of defendant Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 04/16/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-11 | 331 | 0 | AMENDED NOTICE of motion by Law Firms Piper Rudnick and Frommer Lawrence & Haug regarding motion to withdraw as attorneys of record on behalf of defendant Glass Co., Ltd. [330-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 04/16/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-15 | 332 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/15/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held and continued to 5/29/03 at 12:30 p.m. Defendants' motion for leave to withdraw as attorneys of record on behalf of defendant Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. [330-1] is entered and continued. Asahi Glass Company is to file any opposition to defendants motion by 4/29/03. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/17/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-17 | 333 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/17/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner: The parties are directed to respond to the following questions within 7 days of this order: 1. Is the basis for the motion to dismiss a settlement agreement? If so, submit a copy of the agreement with your response to this order. 2. Has the agreement been submitted to the Federal Trade Commission and if so what has been the Commission's response? 3. Why does the order provide for dismissal without prejudice, rather than dismissal with prejudice? 4. Does Asahi object to the dismissal? 5. Why is the motion under seal? Is there anything confidential either in the motion or in the order that the parties are asking me to issue? Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/18/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-17 | 334 | 0 | AGREED MOTION to dismiss all claims and counterclaims between plaintiffs and defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 04/18/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-18 | 336 | 0 | JOINT RESPONSE by plaintiffs and defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to questions raised by court on 4/17/03 regarding agreed motion to dismiss [334-1] (Attachment). (vmj) (Entered: 04/21/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-22 | 337 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/22/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner : The movants are directed to comply with this further order by the close of business on Wednesday, April 23, and there will be a status conference on Thursday, 4/24/03 at 10:00 a.m. in room 1225 of the Dirksen Building to consider the status of their compliance and any other matters germane to the motion to dismiss, including Apotex's motion to intervene. (See reverse of minute order.) Mailed notice (cem) (Entered: 04/23/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-23 | 338 | 0 | MOTION by parties for temporary restraining order to seal settlement agreements submitted in camera review . (cem) (Entered: 04/24/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-23 | 339 | 0 | JOINT RESPONSE by plaintiffs to 4/22/03 order by the parties to the settlement [337-2]. (RESTRICTED) (cem) (Entered: 04/24/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-23 | 340 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of their motion for temporary restraining order [338-1]. (RESTRICTED) (cem) (Entered: 04/24/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-23 | 341 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiff . (RESTRICTED) (cem) (Entered: 04/24/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-23 | 342 | 0 | RESPONSE by Asahi Glass Co Ltd to questions raised by Court on 04/17/03, regarding motion to dismiss all claims and counterclaims between plaintiffs and defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [334-1]. (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-25 | 343 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/25/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Counsel for Smithkline Beecham has notified this court that an agreement has been made with counsel for Pentech and Asahi Glass. SmithKline Beecham is here withdrawing plaintiffs' motions to extend stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA [295-1], [325-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/28/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-28 | 344 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner: Status hearing set for 5/2/03 at 10:00 a.m. Confirming the order orally issued at the status conference on April 24, the parties are ordered to submit briefs on the issues discussed at the conference by the close of business on Thursday, May 1. There will be another status conference on Friday, May 2, at 10 a.m. in Room 1225, at which time the parties will have an opportunity to make brief oral responses to each other's brief. The briefs should indicate whether there are any Federal Circuit decisions concerning any of the procedural issues relating to the pending motion to dismiss, and if so whether they are consistent or inconsistent with Seventh Circuit decisions on the same issues. Telephoned notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/29/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-29 | 345 | 0 | MOTION by plaintiffs/counter-defendants for permanent protective order to seal designated portions of settlement agreements ; Notice. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 04/30/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-29 | 346 | 0 | MEMORANDUM in support of settling parties' motion for permanent protective order to seal designated portions of settlement agreements (Exhibits) (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 04/30/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-29 | 347 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd in opposition to the motion by the Frommer Law Firm to withdraw from its representation of AGC (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 04/30/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 348 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/1/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: The Frommer law firm has until 5/12/03 to submit any reply in support of its motion to withdraw as attorneys of record on behalf of defendant Glass Co., Ltd. [330-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 349 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/1/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: The minute order of 4/25/03, document [343-1], is corrected as follows: Counsel for SmithKline Beecham has notified the court that Smithkline Beecham wishes to withdraw its motion to extend the stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA and that defendants have no objection to that withdrawal, Accordingly, Smithkline Beecham's motion to extend the stay on FDA approval of Pentech's ANDA [295-1, 325-1] are hereby withdrawn. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 350 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 5/2/01.) (vmj) (Entered: 05/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 351 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 5/2/01) (vmj) (Entered: 05/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 352 | 0 | MOTION by Asahi Glass Co Ltd for leave to amend its answer and counterclaim to add counterclaims and cross-claims against plaintiffs, Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. ; Memorandum in support; Notice. (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 353 | 0 | BRIEF concerning Brulotte v. Thys by Asahi Glass Co Ltd (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-01 | 354 | 0 | BRIEF concerning the standard to be applied by the court to a motion to dismiss brought under Fed.R.Civ.P.42(a)(2) by Asahi Glass Co Ltd (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-02 | 355 | 0 | NOTICE of filing by Apotex Corporation, Apotex Inc. and Torpharm, Inc. a redacted version of its amened answerk affirmative defenses, and counterclaims (Attachment). (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-02 | 356 | 0 | NOTICE of filing by Apotex Corporation, Apotex Inc. and Torpharm, Inc. of a letter dated 5/2/03 to Hudge Posner with attached exhibit (Attachment). (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-02 | 357 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/2/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner: Status hearing held. Upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties, SmithKline's motion to dismiss its suit against Pentech without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) is granted [334-1]. terminating Pentech Phar Inc The settling parties' motion for a protective order sealing certain portions of their settlement agreement is granted [345-1]. Apotex Corporation's motion to intervene is denied. An opinion explaining these rulings will issue shortly. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-02 | 358 | 0 | ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Pentech Phar Inc by Matthew S. Miller, Richard J. Prendergast, Michael Thomas Layden and Michael Forde. (gcy) (Entered: 05/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-08 | 359 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/8/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner: Enter Opinion granting to the motion to dismiss (Doc 334-1) and motion for a protective sealing certain portions of their settlement agreement [338-1], [345-1]. Entered Opinion Order. Mailed notice (air) (Entered: 05/09/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-09 | 360 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/9/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: The Frommer Law Firm's unopposed oral request to extend time to 5/16/03 to reply to its motion to withdraw as attorneys of record on behalf of defendant Glass Co., Ltd. [330-1] is granted. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/12/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-16 | 361 | 0 | REPLY by defendants Asahi Glass Co and Pentech to Asahi's opposition to counsel's motion to withdraw (RESTRICTED). (ntf) Modified on 05/19/2003 (Entered: 05/19/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-16 | 362 | 0 | NON-CONFIDENTIAL COMPOSITE OF CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBITS 1 and 2 by plaintiffs of "settling parties" motion for permanent protective order to seal designated portions of settlement agreement (cdy) (Entered: 05/19/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-19 | 363 | 0 | MOTION to dismiss all claims and counterclaims and these civil actions, between SB and Asahi ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 05/21/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-19 | 364 | 0 | Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order on 5/2/01) consisting of plaintiffs memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss all claims and counterclaims, and these civil actions, between SK and Ashai and exhibits to memorandum in support (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 05/21/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-29 | 365 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 5/29/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan : Status hearing held and continued to 6/19/03 at 1:00 p.m. Piper Rudnick and the Frommer, Lawrence & Hugh Law Firm's motion to withdraw as attorneys of record on behalf of Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. is granted [330-1] for the reasons stated in open court. Asahi's motion for leave to amend answer and counterclaim as to defendants is entered and continued [307-1]. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 06/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-05-30 | 366 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd in opposition to plaintiffs' motion to dismiss all claims and counterclaims and these civil actions, between SB and Asahi [363-1] (hmb) (Entered: 06/02/2003) | |||
| 2003-06-04 | 367 | 0 | REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs in support of their motion to dismiss all claims and counterclaims and these civil actions, between SB and Asahi [363-1] (RESTRICTED) (vmj) (Entered: 06/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-29 | 368 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd in opposition to the Grommer Law Firm motion to withdraw from its representation of defendant Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. [330-1] (Attachments). (REDACTED VERSION) (vmj) Modified on 06/11/2003 (Entered: 06/11/2003) | |||
| 2003-04-29 | 369 | 0 | UN-REACTED VERSION of memorandum by Asahi Glass Co Ltd in opposition to the motion by the Frommer Law Firm to withdraw from its representation of AGC (RESTRICTED). (vmj) (Entered: 06/11/2003) | |||
| 2003-06-10 | 370 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/10/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s request to have Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.'s memorandum in opposition to the motion by the Frommer Law Firm to withdraw from its representation of AGC filed under seal is granted. It is hereby ordered that Asahi's memorandum (including attachments) [347-1] is to be removed from the public court file; a redacted version of Asahi's memorandum shall be entered in the public court file; and an unredacted version of Asahi's memorandum is to be filed with the court pursuant to the terms of paragraph 6(b) of the parties' amended protective order. (Entered Unopposed Order) Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 06/11/2003) | |||
| 2003-06-10 | 371 | 0 | FILING of non-confidential versions of papers relating to plaintiffs' motion to dismiss all claims and counterclaims, and these civil actions, between SB and ASahi by defendant Asahi Glass Co Ltd (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 06/11/2003) | |||
| 2003-06-17 | 372 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 6/17/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner: Confirming the rulings made and understandings reached at the status conference held 6/12/03: SmithKline's complaint in No. 00 C 2855 is dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2) with prejudice. Asahi's counterclaims in that case remain pending with the court. Upon the filing by Asahi of an amended complaint in Northern District case No. 03 C 3648, Asahi will dismiss the counterclaims in No. 00 C 2855. The motion to amend Asahi's counterclaims is dimissed as moot [307-1]. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 06/18/2003) | |||
| 2003-06-23 | 373 | 0 | ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant, counter-claimant Asahi Glass Co Ltd by Lewis R. Clayton, Steven C. Herzog. (aga) (Entered: 06/24/2003) | |||
| 2003-07-31 | 374 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 7/31/03 by Hon. Nan R. Nolan: Status hearing held. Asahi having dismissed the counterclaims in the above-referenced case, the motions pending before Magistrate Judge Nolan are denied as moot. Telephonic status hearing set for 8/26/03 at 1:00 p.m. in case no. 03 C 3646. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge. Terminating the case referral to Hon. Nan R. Nolan Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 08/04/2003) | |||
| 2003-07-22 | 375 | 0 | MOTION by defendant Asahi Glass Company, Ltd. to dismiss pending counterclaims ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 08/05/2003) | |||
| 2003-08-08 | 376 | 0 | MINUTE ORDER of 8/8/03 by Hon. Richard A. Posner: Defendant Asahi Glass Company, Ltd.'s motion [375-1] in 00 C 2855 and 0-1 in 00 C 5831) its counterclaims pending in the above-captioned actions without prejudice is granted. All other pending motions in both cases are moot. terminating case Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 08/11/2003) | |||
| 2004-01-20 | 377 | 0 | TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 5/29/03 Before Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (vmj) (Entered: 01/21/2004) | |||
| 2006-01-12 | 378 | 0 | MOTION to intervene to Modify Protective Order (Parr, Keith) (Entered: 01/12/2006) | |||
| 2006-01-12 | 379 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Apotex Corporation, Apotex, Inc., TorPharm Inc. in Support of motion to intervene 378 to Modify Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to E# 2 Exhibit F and G)(Parr, Keith) (Entered: 01/12/2006) | |||
| 2006-01-25 | 380 | 0 | INCORRECT document linked. ATTORNEY Appearance (Roche, Vincent) (Entered: 01/25/2006) | |||
| 2006-01-25 | 381 | 0 | ATTORNEY Appearance (Macey, Eric) (Entered: 01/25/2006) | |||
| 2006-01-25 | 382 | 0 | NOTICE of Correction regarding attorney appearance 380 . (air, ) (Entered: 01/26/2006) | |||
| 2006-01-26 | 383 | 0 | ATTORNEY Appearance (Roche, Vincent) (Entered: 01/26/2006) | |||
| 2006-02-03 | 384 | 0 | RESPONSE by Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Beecham Group, p.l.c. to MOTION to intervene to Modify Protective Order 378 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(O'Brien, Richard) (Entered: 02/03/2006) | |||
| 2006-02-03 | 385 | 0 | RESPONSE by Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to MOTION to intervene to Modify Protective Order 378 (Roche, Vincent) (Entered: 02/03/2006) | |||
| 2006-02-03 | 386 | 0 | MEMORANDUM of Law by Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in Opposition to Apotex's motion to intervene to modify protective order 378 . (mjc, ) (Entered: 02/07/2006) | |||
| 2006-02-10 | 387 | 0 | MINUTE entry before Judge Richard A. Posner : It is ORDERED that Smithkline Beecham Corp. and Beecham Group, p.l.c., may produce to Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., copies of the sealed documents and transcripts at issue in Apotex's Motion to Intervene to Modify Protective Order pursuant to the January 31, 2006 Order in Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp., 99-CV-4304, 00-CV-4888, 01-CV-159, 01-CV-2169 (E.D. Pa.). It is further ORDERED that Apotex's Motion shall be denied as moot. Mailed notice (sct, ) (Entered: 02/10/2006) | |||
| 2007-09-25 | 388 | 0 | MOTION by Defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.for Access to Sealed Filings and Relief From Protective Orders (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, B, C# 2 Exhibit D, E# 3 Exhibit F, G, H)(Macey, Eric) (Entered: 09/25/2007) | |||
| 2007-10-09 | 389 | 0 | MEMORANDUM by Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Beecham Group, p.l.c. in Opposition to motion for miscellaneous relief 388 (for access to sealed filings and relief from protective orders) (O'Brien, Richard) (Entered: 10/09/2007) | |||
| 2007-10-12 | 390 | 0 | MOTION to intervene for a limited purpose (Prendergast, Richard) (Entered: 10/12/2007) | |||
| 2007-10-12 | 391 | 0 | MEMORANDUM in support of motion for leave to intervene for a limited purpose (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Prendergast, Richard) (Entered: 10/12/2007) | |||
| 2007-10-12 | 392 | 0 | NOTICE by PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc. re memorandum in support of motion 391 , MOTION to intervene for a limited purpose 390 (Prendergast, Richard) (Entered: 10/12/2007) | |||
| 2007-10-18 | 393 | 0 | REPLY by Defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In Support Of Its Motion For Access To Sealed Filings And Relief From Protective Orders (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, B and C)(Macey, Eric) (Entered: 10/18/2007) | |||
| 2007-11-09 | 394 | 0 | MINUTE entry before Judge Richard A. Posner : Pentechs motion for access to sealed filings and relief from protective order [#388] is taken under advisement. Pentech is directed to supplement its motion, as specified below, by November 19, 2007. Smithkline shall file its response by November 26, 2007. Mailed notice (vcf, ) (Entered: 11/20/2007) | |||
| 2007-11-19 | 395 | 0 | MINUTE entry before Judge Blanche M. Manning : The court regrets the problems issuing its November 9, 2007, order. The clerk is directed to reissue that order and enter it nunc pro tunc as of November 9, 2007. Pentech is directed to supplement its motion by November 26, 2007, and Smithkline shall file its response by December 3, 2007.Mailed notice (vcf, ) (Entered: 11/20/2007) | |||
| 2007-11-19 | 396 | 0 | Duplicate filing of document number 395. Modified on 11/20/2007 (vcf, ). Modified on 12/18/2007 (td, ). (Entered: 11/20/2007) | |||
| 2007-11-20 | 397 | 0 | NOTICE of Correction regarding set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings 396 .The entry is a duplicate of entry no. 295. The text of the entry has been edited to read Duplicate filing of document number. (vcf, ) (Entered: 11/20/2007) | |||
| 2007-11-20 | 398 | 0 | MINUTE entry before Judge Blanche M. Manning : Briefing schedule issued on 11/19/2007 is amended as follows: Pentech is directed to supplement its motion by November 28, 2007, and Smithkline shall file its response by December 5, 2007. Mailed notice (vcf, ) (Entered: 11/20/2007) | |||
| 2007-11-28 | 399 | 0 | MOTION by Defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Supplemental) For Access To Sealed Filings (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Macey, Eric) (Entered: 11/28/2007) | |||
| 2007-12-05 | 400 | 0 | RESPONSE by Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Beecham Group, p.l.c. to MOTION by Defendant Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Supplemental) For Access To Sealed Filings 399 (O'Brien, Richard) (Entered: 12/05/2007) | |||
| 2008-01-08 | 401 | 0 | MINUTE entry before Judge Richard A. Posner : This matter having come before the Court on Pentech Parmaceuticals, Inc.'s motion for access to sealed filing and relief from protective orders and Pentech's supplemental motion for access to seal filings. 388 399 On said motions, Enter Order. (For further detail see separate order.) Notices mailed by Judicial staff (hp, ) (Entered: 01/10/2008) | |||
| 2008-01-08 | 402 | 0 | ORDER re 401 Signed by Judge Richard A. Posner on 1/8/2008:Mailed notice(hp, ) (Entered: 01/10/2008) | |||
| 2008-10-24 | 403 | 0 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable James F. Holderman:The parties in this case are given to November 12, 2008 to remove all documents filed under seal with the Clerk of Court. Parties are to contact the Clerk of Court with respect to instructions on how to retrieve said documents. The Clerk of Court is given authority to destroy all under seal documents in his possession if they are not retrieved by the close of business November 12, 2008.Mailed notice (sct, ) (Entered: 10/24/2008) | |||
| 2008-11-07 | 404 | 0 | ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of sealed documents. (vcf, ) (Entered: 11/12/2008) | |||
| 2008-11-07 | 405 | 0 | ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of sealed documents. (vcf, ) (Entered: 11/12/2008) |