Case details

Court: nysd
Docket #: 1:06-cv-05801
Case Name: Riel v. Morgan Stanley et al
PACER case #: 287885
Date filed: 2006-07-31
Date terminated: 2009-08-07
Date of last filing: 2009-08-07

Documents

Date Filed Document # Attachment # Short Description Long Description Upload date SHA1 hash
2006-07-31 1 0 Complaint 2012-06-26 14:00:43 63f8e573148bba2392fe9b5c79b7e96c31774a48
2006-08-10 2 0 Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment
2006-08-22 3 0 Motion to Strike
2006-08-22 4 0 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2006-08-22 5 0 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement
2006-08-25 6 0 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
2006-08-30 7 0 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
2006-09-06 8 0 Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion
2006-09-06 9 0 Declaration in Opposition to Motion
2006-09-06 10 0 Motion for Sanctions
2006-09-06 11 0 Declaration in Support of Motion
2006-09-06 12 0 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2006-09-18 13 0 Reply Affirmation in Support of Motion
2006-09-18 14 0 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2006-09-25 15 0 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2006-09-25 16 0 Reply Affidavit in Support of Motion
2006-12-11 17 0 Notice of Substitution of Attorney
2007-05-23 18 0 Motion to Stay
2007-05-23 19 0 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2007-05-23 20 0 Declaration in Support of Motion
2007-06-11 21 0 Notice (Other)
2007-06-12 22 0 Notice of Appearance
2007-09-06 23 0 Memorandum & Opinion
2008-12-03 24 0 Notice of Appearance
2008-12-03 25 0 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement
2009-01-30 26 0 Motion to Dismiss
2009-01-30 27 0 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2009-01-30 28 0 Declaration in Support of Motion
2009-02-03 29 0 Motion to Dismiss
2009-02-03 30 0 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2009-02-03 31 0 Declaration in Support of Motion
2009-02-17 32 0 Endorsed Letter
2009-02-27 33 0 Declaration in Opposition to Motion
2009-02-27 34 0 Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion
2009-03-16 35 0 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion
2009-08-06 36 0 Memorandum & Opinion
2009-08-07 37 0 Clerk's Judgment