| Court: | nysd |
| Docket #: | 1:14-cv-08448 |
| Case Name: | Link v. The United States Of America et al |
| PACER case #: | 434246 |
| Date filed: | 2014-10-20 |
| Date terminated: | 2015-01-26 |
| Assigned to: | Judge George B. Daniels |
| Case Cause: | 28:1331 Fed. Question |
| Nature of Suit: | 440 Civil Rights: Other |
| Jury Demand: | None |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Represented Party | Attorney & Contact Info |
| Suitor Darrell Allen Link Plaintiff |
Darrell Allen Link |
| The United States Of America Defendant |
|
| John and Jane Does 15 through ??? Defendant to be named when discovered |
|
| MF Global Holdings, Ltd. Defendant |
|
| United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York Defendant |
|
| Martin Glenn Defendant United States Bankruptcy Court Judge |
|
| Vito Genna Defendant United States Bankruptcy Court Clerk |
|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Defendant |
|
| Loretta A. Preska Defendant United States District Court Chief Judge |
|
| Ruby J. Krajick Defendant United States District Court Clerk |
|
| Louis J. Freeh Defendant Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee |
|
| James W. Giddens Defendant Bankruptcy Trustee |
|
| Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Defendant |
|
| Laura Murphy Defendant Claim Counsel for Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America |
|
| Pepper Hamilton LLP Defendant |
|
| Thomas McC. Souther Defendant attorney representing Louis J. Freeh, trustee |
|
| Daniels Trading Defendant Broker-Agency |
| Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
| 2014-10-22 | 1 | 0 | COMPLAINT against Louis J. Freeh, Vito Genna, James W. Giddens, Martin Glenn, John and Jane Does 15 through, Ruby J. Krajick, MF Global Holdings, Ltd., Thomas McC. Souther, Laura Murphy, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Loretta A. Preska, The United States Of America, Daniels Trading, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Document filed by Darrell Allen Link.(moh) (Entered: 10/29/2014) | |||
| 2014-10-22 | 2 | 0 | REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Darrell Allen Link.(moh) (Entered: 10/29/2014) | |||
| 2015-01-26 | 4 | 0 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Even when read with the "special solicitude" due pro se pleadings, Tracy v. Freshwater, 623 F.3d 90, 101 (2d Cir. 2010), Plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed as frivolous. Plaintiff's allegations are baseless, rise to the level of the irrational, and there is no legal theory on which Plaintiff can rely. See Denton, 504 U.S. at 33; Livingston, 141 F.3d at 437. District courts generally grant a pro se plaintiff an opportunity to amend a complaint to cure its defects, but leave to amend is not required where it would be futile. See Hill v. Curcione, 657 F.3d 116, 123 (2d Cir. 2011); Salahuddin v. Cuomo, 861F.2d40, 42 (2d Cir. 1988). Because the defects in Plaintiff's complaint cannot be cured with an amendment, the Court declines to grant Plaintiff leave to amend. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). This Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). This case is therefore DISMISSED as to all Defendants. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/26/2015) (mro) (Entered: 01/26/2015) | |||
| 2015-01-30 | 5 | 0 | CIVIL JUDGMENT: that the complaint is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/30/2015) (tn) Modified on 2/19/2015 (tn). (Entered: 01/30/2015) | |||
| 2015-02-17 | 6 | 0 | (Motion Purs. to Rule 60B)SUITOR'S ONE SUPREME COURT IN AND OR THE COUNTRY OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME ARTICLE III JUDICIAL POWER OF THE UNTIED STATES, NEW TRIAL COURT EXERCISING ORIGINAL, APPELLATE & FINAL JURISDICTIONS, AS TO BOTH LAW & FACT OVER USDC-SDNY CASE NO. 14-CV-8448(GBD); re: 5 Judgment. Document filed by Darrell Allen Link.(sc) Modified on 2/18/2015 (sc). (Entered: 02/18/2015) | |||
| 2015-03-03 | 7 | 0 | ORDER denying 6 Motion for Reconsideration. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks, in his latest submission (ECF No. 6), relief under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or under Local Civil Rule 6.3, that relief is denied. No further filings will be accepted in this action except those directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/03/2015) (ama) (Entered: 03/03/2015) |