| Date Filed |
Document # |
Attachment # |
Short Description |
Long Description |
Upload date |
SHA1 hash |
| 2012-05-24 |
15 |
0 |
|
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - re 1 - Based on the foregoing analysis, the Petition herein should be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealabi lity and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and thus not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/24/12. (kje1) |
2012-05-25 09:16:19 |
fbed9a9208f318701731de5647f278b513a604ac |
| 2012-08-23 |
19 |
0 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Based on the foregoing analysis, it is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be d enied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and thus not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/10/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/23/2012. (kpf1) |
2012-08-24 09:07:05 |
0a6ca450f869e6b2da8e603adf15f7c95a073ecb |
| 2012-11-17 |
23 |
0 |
|
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice, a certificate of appealability be denied, and the Court certify any appeal would not be taken in objective good faith. Objections to R&R due by 12/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/15/2012. (kpf1) |
2012-11-17 08:57:30 |
1a8d777fd3918ab52dd04efa965732bc2eed4456 |
| 2013-06-12 |
24 |
0 |
|
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 Report and Recommendation, 19 Supplemental Report and Recommendation, 23 Second Supplemental Report and Recommendation. Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED WI TH PREJUDICE. The Court further FINDS that a certificate of appealability should not issue with respect to the Petition and CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3) that with respect to any application by Petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore the Court DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 6/11/2013. (km1) |
2013-06-12 08:30:10 |
4b0aed75a1cc07e9a923f5c04a3f400879c5538b |