Case details

Court: tned
Docket #: 2:10-cv-00261
Case Name: Jones v. Sexton et al
PACER case #: 59339
Case Cause: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Documents

Date Filed Document # Attachment # Short Description Long Description Upload date SHA1 hash
2012-02-02 26 0 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel H Jones; The Court FINDS that the claims asserted in the petition have been exhausted and, thus, DENIES respondent's motion to dismiss, [Doc. 10]. M otions DENIED: 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Sexton. Accordingly, petitioner shall have twenty days from the date on this order to amend his petition to set forth, clearly and concisely, the specific facts which illustrate the claims offered for habeas corpus relief. If petitioner submits an amended petition, correcting the noted deficiencies, respondent SHALL file an answer to the amended petition within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this order. If petitioner chooses to let h is claims stand as they have been offered and does not file an amended petition within the thirty day time-frame, respondent SHALL answer the original petition. In that event, the Court will review each claim in its present form and resolve the claim as it has been presented. Any reply to the answer SHALL be filed within thirty days from the date the answer is filed. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/2/2012. (c/m to pro se petitioner) (RLC, ) 2012-02-03 10:22:16 cfea5b1ac45f2afcad40b96d408e67dabb7bf644
2012-03-20 31 0 MEMORANDUM OPINION: After carefully reviewing the entire record, the Court finds it unnecessary to hold an evidentiary hearing and, thus, will DENY petitioners motion for a hearing, [Doc. 15]. Petitioner is not entitled to habeas co rpus relief and, for that reason, the writ of habeas corpus will be DENIED and this petition will be DISMISSED. No COA will issue because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). An appropriate order will enter. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 3/19/2012. (c/m to pro se petitioner) (RLC, ) 2012-03-20 10:12:35 eb4d1b0242c19b4c7bab2447ad2fd209990d55a4