Case details

Court: txed
Docket #: 6:15-cv-00652
Case Name: Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Allied Telesis, Inc.
PACER case #: 161209
Date filed: 2015-07-02
Assigned to: Judge Rodney Gilstrap
Referred to: Magistrate Judge John D. Love
Case Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Parties

Represented Party Attorney & Contact Info
Chrimar Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff
Richard Lawrence Wynne , Jr
Thompson & Knight LLP - Dallas 1722 Routh Street Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201-2533 214/969-1700 Fax: 12149691751 Email: richard.wynne@tklaw.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Justin S. Cohen
Thompson & Knight LLP - Dallas 1722 Routh Street Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201-2533 214-969-1211 Fax: 214-999-1565 Email: justin.cohen@tklaw.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Chrimar Holding Company, LLC
Plaintiff
Richard Lawrence Wynne , Jr
(See above for address)
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Justin S. Cohen
(See above for address)
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Allied Telesis, Inc.
Defendant
Peter Joseph Corcoran , III
Corcoran IP Law, P.L.L.C 2019 Richmond Rd. Suite 380 Texarkana, TX 75503 (903) 701-2481 Fax: (844) 362-3291 Email: peter@corcoranip.com
TERMINATED: 12/15/2015

Robert Christopher Bunt
Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: rcbunt@pbatyler.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Documents

Date Filed Document # Attachment # Short Description Long Description Upload date SHA1 hash
2015-07-02 1 0 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5277934.), filed by Chrimar Systems, Inc., Chrimar Holding Company, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Notice to USPTO)(Cohen, Justin) (Entered: 07/02/2015)
2015-07-06 2 0 SUMMONS Issued as to Allied Telesis, Inc., and emailed to pltf for service. (mll, ) (Entered: 07/06/2015)
2015-07-08 3 0 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard Lawrence Wynne, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wynne, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2015)
2015-07-08 4 0 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Chrimar Systems, Inc. (Wynne, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2015)
2015-07-17 5 0 ***DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD. ATTY TO REFILE CORRECTED DOCUMENT.***Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time (30 days) to Answer Complaint re Allied Telesis, Inc.(Corcoran, Peter) Modified on 7/21/2015 (mjc, ). (Entered: 07/17/2015)
2015-07-20 6 0 Return of Service Executed as to Allied Telesis, Inc. on 7/10/2015, by personal service. (mll, ) (Entered: 07/20/2015)
2015-07-21 7 0 Defendant's Unopposed First (corrected) Application for Extension of Time (30 days) to Answer Complaint re Allied Telesis, Inc..(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 07/21/2015)
2015-07-24 8 0 Return of Service Executed as to Allied Telesis, Inc. on 7/10/2015, by personal service. (mll, ) (Entered: 07/24/2015)
2015-08-19 9 0 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for 15-Day Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Allied Telesis, Inc.(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 08/19/2015)
2015-09-15 10 0 First MOTION to Dismiss Indirect Infringement Claims of Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
2015-09-15 11 0 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, under FRCP 12(a)(4)(A) by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
2015-09-15 12 0 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Chrimar Systems, Inc. (Wynne, Richard) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
2015-09-15 13 0 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Allied Telesis, Inc. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
2015-09-17 14 0 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Chrimar Systems, Inc., Chrimar Holding Company, LLC.(Wynne, Richard) (Entered: 09/17/2015)
2015-09-17 15 0 RESPONSE in Opposition re 10 First MOTION to Dismiss Indirect Infringement Claims of Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) filed by Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Chrimar Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wynne, Richard) (Entered: 09/17/2015)
2015-09-27 16 0 REPLY to Response to Motion re 10 First MOTION to Dismiss Indirect Infringement Claims of Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) filed by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 09/27/2015)
2015-10-05 17 0 Second MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' (First Amended) Complaint by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 10/05/2015)
2015-10-05 18 0 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 14 Amended Complaint under FRCP 12(a)(4)(A) by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 10/05/2015)
2015-10-15 19 0 RESPONSE in Opposition re 17 Second MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' (First Amended) Complaint filed by Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Chrimar Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wynne, Richard) (Entered: 10/15/2015)
2015-10-20 20 0 ORDER denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/20/15. (mll, ) (Entered: 10/20/2015)
2015-10-26 21 0 REPLY to Response to Motion re 17 Second MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' (First Amended) Complaint for patent infringement filed by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter) (Entered: 10/26/2015)
2015-10-28 22 0 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION. The above-captioned cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues, except venue. Cause No. 6:15cv618 is designated as the LEAD CASE. All parties are instructed to file any future filings except relating to venue in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for venue determinations and trial. The Court will enter one docket control order, one protective order, and one discovery order that will govern the entire consolidated case. The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated defendants into the Lead Case and their corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/28/15. (mll, ) (Entered: 10/30/2015)
2016-01-29 23 0 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration Kirchick, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Affidavit Declaration Bunt, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Bunt, Robert) (Entered: 01/29/2016)
2016-02-16 24 0 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Chrimar Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohen, Justin) (Entered: 02/16/2016)
2016-02-17 25 0 ORDER granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 23 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California; Responses due by 3/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 02/17/16. (mll, ) (Entered: 02/17/2016)
2016-02-26 26 0 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply <re Motion to transfer venue by Chrimar Holding Company, LLC, Chrimar Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohen, Justin) (Entered: 02/26/2016)
2016-02-29 27 0 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 23 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California. Responses due by 3/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 2/29/2016. (gsg) (Entered: 02/29/2016)