' 11 Sir s;iii!.ii;i i li ' .'! ! •• .1,- .ill if lliii ! li 1 "-^ "ROSE HILL." \YV^^s=-^TIVOLl P.O. Duchess Co.. n. y u FORTHE PEOPLE FOR EDVCATION FOR SCIENCE LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FIELD AND GENEEAL OENITHOLOGY HANDBOOK OF FIELD AND GENERAL OKNITHOLOGY A MANUAL OF THE STEUCTUEE AXD CLASSIFICATIOX OF BIEDS f'/. / y - o WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR COLLECTING AND PKESERVING SPECIMENS BY PEOFESSOE ELLIOTT COUES, M.A., M.D., etc. VICE-PRESIDENT AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION ; FOREIGN MEMBER BRITISH ornithologists' UNION ; CORRESPONDING MEMBER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, ETC. ILLUSTRATED ILoutiou MACMILLAN AND CO. 1890 All rights reserved Note. — The Publishers beg to give notice that copies of this English Edition of Dr. Coiies's Book cannot be introduced into the United States of America. sr. ifj ft. dkt. 3,1. PUBLISHERS' PREFACE By arrangement with the American publishers of Professor Cones's Kaj to North American Birds, which has been for many years the standard text -book of Ornithology, we are enabled to present a new edition of those portions of the " Key" which have not less interest for the English than for the American public. The present volume consists of two distinct parts. Part I., entitled " Field Ornithology," contains the necessary instructions for the observation and collection of birds in the field, and for the preparation and preservation of specimens for scientific study in the cabinet. Part II., entitled " General Ornithology," is a technical treatise on the classification, the zoological characters, and the anatomical structure of the class of Birds, in which the examples cited in illustration of the principles of Ornithology have for the most part been redrawn by the author from British instead of American birds. With the further exception of a few verbal changes, and slight abridgment in one or two places, made by the author in revising the proofs, the present " Handbook " is a reprint of the portions of the " Key" above specified. CONTENTS PART I FIELD OEXITHOLOGY SECTION I. Implements for CoLLECTixfj, axd their Use II. Dogs III. Various Suggestions axd Directioxs for Field- Work IV. Hygiene of Collectorship ... V. Registration and Labelling VI. IXSTRUMEXTS, MATERIALS, AND FIXTURES FOR PREPARING SKINS .... VII. How TO MAKE A BiRDSKIN . VIII. MiSCELLANEOU.S PARTICULARS IX. Collection of ISTests and Eggs X. Care uf a Collection BlRD- PAOE 3 14 15 28 33 38 42 68 75 82 PART II GENERAL OEXITHOLOGY I. Definition of Birds ....... 91 II. Principles and Practice of Cla.ssification . . .99 III. Defixitions and Descriptions of the Exterior Parts of Birds 123 IV. An Ixtroduction to the Anatomy of Birds . . . 197 PART I FIELD OENITHOLOGY BEING A MANUAL OF INSTRUCTION FOR COLLECTING, PREPARING, AND PRESERVING BIRDS FIELD ORNITHOLOGY Field ornithology must lead the way to systematic and descriptive ornitholog}'. The study of birds in the field is an indispensable prerequisite to their scientific study in the library and the museum. Directions for observing and collecting birds, for preparing and pre- serving them as objects of natural history, will greatly help the student to become a successful ornithologist, if he will faithfully and intelligently observe these rules. It is believed that the practical instructions which the author has to give will, if followed out, enable any one who has the least taste or aptitude for such pursuits to become proficient in the necessary qualifications of the good working ornithologist. These instructions are derived from the writer's own experience, reaching in time over thirty years, and extending in area over large portions of North America. Having made in the field the personal acquaintance of most species of North American birds, and having shot and skinned with his own hands several thousand specimens, he may reasonably venture to speak with confidence, if not also with authority, resj)ecting methods of study and manipulation. Feeling so much at home in the field — with his gun for destroying birds, and his instruments for preserv- ing their skins — he wishes to put the most inexperienced student equally at ease ; and therefore begs to lay formality aside, that he may address the reader as if chatting with a friend on a subject of mutual interest. § 1.— IMPLEMENTS FOR COLLECTING, AND THEIR USE The Double-barrelled Shot Gun is your main reliance. Under some circumstances you may trap or snare birds, catch them with bird-lime, or use other devices ; but such cases are exceptions to FIELD ORNITHOLOGY the rule that you Avill shoot birds, and for this purpose no Aveapon compares with the one just mentioned. The soul of good advice respecting the selection of a gun is, Get the best one you can afford to buy ; go the full length of your purse in the matters of material and workmanship. To say nothing of the prime requisite, safety, or of the next most desirable quality, efficiency, the durability of a high-priced gun makes it cheapest in the end. Style of finish is obviously of little consequence, except as an index of other qualities ; for inferior guns rarely, if ever, display the exquisite appointments that mark a first-rate arm. There is really so little choice among good guns that nothing need be said on this score ; you cannot miss it if you pay enough to any reputable maker or reliable dealer. But collecting is a specialty, and some guns are better adapted than others to your particular purpose. This is the destruction, as a rule, of small birds, at moderate range, with the least possible injury to their plumage. Probably three-fourths or more of the birds of any miscellaneous collection average under the size of a pigeon, and were shot Avithin thirty yards. A heavy gun is therefore unnecessary, in fact ineligible, the extra weight being useless. You will find a gun of seven and a half to eight pounds weight most suitable. For similar reasons the bore should be small ; I prefer fourteen gauge, and should not think of going over twelve. Length of barrel is of less consequence than many suppose ; for myself, I incline to a rather long barrel — one nearer thirty-three than twenty-eight inches — believing that such a barrel may throw shot better ; but I am not sure that this is even the rule, while it is well known that several circumstances of loading, besides some almost inappreciable differences in the way barrels are bored, will cause guns apparently exactly alike to throw shot differently. Length and crook of stock should of course be adapted to your figure — a gun may be made to fit you, as well as a coat. For wild- fowl shooting, and on some other special occasions, a heavier and altogether more powerful gun will be preferable. Breech-loader v. Muzzle-loader, a case formerly argued, has long been settled in favour of the former. Provided the mechanism and workmanship of the breech be what they should, there are no valid objections to offset obvious advantages, some of which are these : ease and rapidity of loading, and consequent delivery of shots in quick succession ; facility of cleaning ; compactness and portability of ammunition; readiness with which difterent- sized shot may be used. This last is highly important to the collector, who never knows the moment he may wish to fire at a very different bird from such as he has already loaded for. The muzzle- loader must always contain the fine shot with which nine-tenths -of your specimens Avill be secured ; if in both barrels, you cannot SEC. I IMPLEMENTS FOR COLLECTING, AND THEIR USE 5 deal with a hawk or other large bird with reasonable prospects of success ; if in only one barrel, the other being more heavily charged, you are crippled to the extent of exactly one-half of your resources for ordinary shooting. Whereas, with the breech-loader you will habitually use mustard-seed in both barrels, and yet can slip in a different shell in time to seize most op})ortunities requiring large shot. This consideration alone should decide the case. Moreover, the time spent in the field in loading an ordinary gun is no small item ; while cartridges may be charged in your leisure at home. This should become the natural occupation of your spare moments. No time is really gained ; you simply change to advantage the time consumed. Metal shells, charged with loose ammunition, and susceptible of being reloaded many times, may be used instead of any special fixed ammunition which, once exhausted in a distant place (and circumstances may upset the best calculations on that score), leaves the gun useless. On charging the shells, mark the number of the shot used on the outside wad ; or better, use coloured wads — say plain white for dust shot, and red, blue, and green for certain other sizes. If going far away, take as many shells as you think can possibly be wanted — and a few more. Experience, however, will soon teach you to prefer paper cartridges for breech-loaders. They may of course be loaded according to circumstances, with the same facility as metal shells, and even reloaded if desired. It is a good deal of trouble to take care of metal shells, to prevent loss, keep them clean, and avoid bending or indenting ; while there is often a practical difficulty in recapping — at least with the common styles that take a special primer. Those fitted with a screw top holding a nijiple for ordinary caps are expensive. Paper cartridges come already capped, so that this bother is avoided, and it is not ordinarily worth while to reload them. They are made of different colours, distinguishing various sizes of shot used without employing the coloured wads otherwise required. They may be taken into the field empty and loaded on occasion to suit ; but it is better to pay a trifle extra to have them loaded at the shop. In such case, about four-fifths of the stock should contain mustard-seed, nearly all the rest about No. 7, a very few being reserved for about No. 4. Cost of ammunition is hardly appreciably increased ; its weight is put in the most conveniently portable shape ; the whole apparatus for carrying it loose and for loading the shells is dispensed with ; much time is saved, the entire drudgery (excepting gun- cleaning) of collecting being avoided. I was prepared in this way during the summer of 1873 for the heaviest work I ever succeeded in accomplishing dur- ing the same length of time. In June, when birds were plentiful, I easily averaged fifteen skins a day, and occasionally made twice FIELD ORNITHOLOGY as many. As items serving to base calculations, I may mention that in four months I used about two thousand cartridges, loaded, at $42 per M., with seven-eighths of an ounce of shot and two and three -fourths drachms of powder. Only about three hundred were charged with shot larger than mustard-seed. In estimating the size of a collection that may result from use of a given number of cartridges, it may not be safe for even a good shot to count on much more than half as many specimens as cartridges. The number is practically reduced by the following steps : Cartridges lost or damaged, or originally defective ; shots missed ; bii"ds killed or wounded, not recovered ; specimens secured unfit for presei'vation, or not preserved for any reason ; specimens accidentally spoilt in stuffing, or subsequently damaged, so as to be not worth keeping ; and finally, use of cartridges to kill game for the table. Other Weapons, etc. — An ordinary single-harrel gun will of course answer ; but is a sorry makeshift, for it is sometimes so poorly constructed as to be unsafe, and can at best be only just half as effective. This remark does not apply to any of the fine single-barrelled breech-loaders now made. You will find these very effective weapons, and they are not at all expensive. An arm noAv much used by collectors is a kind of breech-loading pistol, Avith or without a skeleton gun-stock to screw into the handle, and taking a particular style of metal cartridge, charged with a few grains of powder, or with nothing but the fulminate. They are very light, very cheap, safe and easy to work, and astonishingly effective up to twenty or thirty yards ; making probably the best "second choice " after the matchless double-barrelled breech-loader itself. The cane- gun should be mentioned in this connection. It is a single-barrel, lacquered to look like a stick, with a brass stopper at the muzzle to imitate a ferule, countersunk hammer and trigger, and either a simple curved handle, or a light gunstock-shaped piece that screws in. The affair is easily mistaken for a cane. Some have acquired considerable dexterity in its use ; my own experience with it is very limited and unsatisfactory ; the handle always hit me in the face, and I generally missed my bird. It has only two recommendations. If you approve of shooting on Sunday, and 3'^et scruple to shock popular prejudice, you can slip out of town unsuspected. If you are shooting where the law forbids destruction of small birds, — a wise and good law that you may sometimes be inclined to defy, — artfully careless handling of the deceitful implement may prevent arrest and fine. A hlow-gtin is sometimes used. It is a long slender tube of wood, metal, or glass, through Avhich clay balls, tiny arrows, etc., are projected by force of the breath. It must be quite an art to use such a weapon successfully, and its employment is necessarily exceptional. Some uncivilised tribes are said to possess marvellous SEC. I IMPLEMENTS FOR COLLECTING, AND THEIR USE 7 skill in the use of long bamboo blow-guns ; and such people are often valuable employes of the collector. I have had no experience with the noiseless air-rjim, which is, in effect, a modified blow-gun, compressed air being the explosive power. Nor can I say much of various methods of trapping birds that may be practised. On these points I must leave you to your own devices, with the remark that horse-hair snares, set over a nest, are often of great service in securing the parent of eggs that might otherwise remain unidentified. I have no practical knowledge of bird -lime. A method of netting birds alive, which I have tried, is both easy and successful. A net of fine green silk, some eight or ten feet square, is stretched perpen- dicularly across a narrow part of one of the little brooks, overgrown with briers and shrubbery, that intersect many of our meadows. Eetreating to a distance, the collector beats along the shrubbery making all the noise he can, urging on the little birds till they reach the almost invisible net and become entangled in trying to fly through. I have in this manner taken a dozen sparrows and the like at one "drive." But the gun can rarely be laid aside for this or any other device. Ammunition. — The best powder is that combining strength and cleanliness in the highest compatible degree. In some brands too much of the latter is sacrificed to the former. Other things being equal, a rather coarse powder is preferable, since its slower action tends to throw shot closer. Some numbers are said to be " too quick " for fine breech-loaders. Inexperienced sportsmen and col- lectors almost invariably use too coarse shot. Then two evils result : The number of pellets in a load is decreased, the chances of killing being correspondingly lessened ; and the plumage is badly injured, either by direct mutilation, or by subsequent bleeding through large holes. As already hinted, shot cannot be too fine for your routine collecting. Use "mustard-seed," or "dust-shot," as it is variously called ; it is smaller than any of the sizes usually numbered. As the very finest can only be procured in cities, provide yourself liberally on leaving any centre of civilisation for even a country village, to say nothing of remote regions. A small bird that would have been torn to pieces by a few large pellets, may be riddled with mustard-seed and yet be preservable ; moreover, there is, as a rule, little or no bleeding from such minute holes, which close up by the elasticity of the tissues involved. It is astonishing what large birds may be brought down with these tiny pellets. I have killed hawks with such shot, knocked over a wood-ibis at forty yards, and once shot a wolf dead with No. 10 — though I am bound to say the animal was within a few feet of me. After dust-shot, and the nearest number or two, No. 8 or 7 Avill be found most useful. Water-fowl, thick-skinned sea-birds like loons, cormorants, and pelicans, and a FIELD ORNITHOLOGY few of the largest land-birds, require heavier shot. I have had no experience with the substitution of fine gravel or sand, much less water, as a projectile ; besides shot I never fired anything at a bird except my ramrod, on one or two occasions, when I never afterward saw either the bird or the stick. Cut felt xmds are the only suitable article. Ely's " chemically prepared " wadding is the best. It is well, when using plain wads, occasionally to drive a greased one through the barrel. Since you may sometimes run out of wads through an unexpected contingency, always keep a wad-cutter to fit your gun. You can make serviceable wads of pasteboard, but they are inferior to felt. Cut them on the flat sawn end of a stick of firewood. Use a wooden mallet, instead of a hammer or hatchet, and so save your cutter. Soft paper is next best after wads ; I have never used rags, cotton, or tow, fearing these tinder-like sub- stances might leave a spark in the barrels. Crumbled leaves or grass will answer at a pinch. Other Equipments. — (a) For the gun. A gun-case will come cheap in the end, especially if you travel much. The usual box, divided into compartments, and well lined, is the best, though the full-length leather or india-rubber cloth case answers very well. The box should contain a small kit of tools, such as mainspring-vice, nipple-wrench, screw-driver, etc. A stout hard-wood cleaning-rod, with wormer, will be required. It is always safe to have parts of the gun-lock, especially mainspring, in duplicate. For muzzle- loaders extra nipples and extra ramrod heads and tips often come into use. For breech-loaders the apparatus for charging the shells is practically indispensable, {h) For amniunition. Metal shells or paper cartridges may be carried loose in the large lower coat pocket, or in a leather satchel. There is said to be a chance of explosion by some unlucky blow, Avhen they are so carried, but I never knew of an instance. Another way is to fix them separately in a row in snug loops of soft leather sewn continuously along a stout waist-belt ; or in several such horizontal rows on a square piece of thick leather, to be slung by a strap over the shoulder, ■ But better than anything else is a stout linen vest, similarly furnished with loops holding each a cartridge ; this distributes the weight so perfectly, that the usual " forty rounds " may be carried without feeling it. The appliances for loose ammunition are almost endlessly varied, so every one may consult his taste or convenience. But now that everybody uses the breech-loader, shot-pouches and powder-flasks are among the things that were. (c) For specimens. You must always carry paper in which to wrap up your specimens, as more particularly directed beyond. Nothing is better for this purpose than writing-paper ; " rejected " or otherwise useless MSS. may thus be utilised. The ordinary game-bag, with leather back and network front, answers SEC. I IMPLEMENTS FOR COLLECTING, AND THEIR USE 9 very well ; but a light basket, fitting the body, such as the creel used by anglers, is the best thing to carry specimens in. Avoid putting specimens into pockets, unless you have your coat-tail largely excavated ; crowding them into a close pocket, where they press each other, and receive warmth from the person, Avill injure them. It is always well to take a little raw cotton into the field, to plug up shot-holes, mouth, nostrils, or vent, immediately if required. (cl) For yourself. The indications to be fulfilled in your clothing are these : Adaptability to the weather ; and since a shooting-coat is not conveniently changed, while an overcoat is ordinarily ineli- gible, the requirement is best met by different underclothes. Easy fit, allowing perfect freedom of muscular action, especially of the arms. Strength of fabric, to resist briers and stand wear ; velveteen and corduroy are excellent materials. Subdued colour, to render you as inconspicuous as possible, and to show dirt the least. Multi- plicity of pockets — a perfect shooting-coat is an ingenious system of hanging pouches about the person. Broad-soled, low-heeled boots or shoes, giving a firm tread even when wet. Close-fitting cap with prominent visor, or low soft felt hat, rather broad-brimmed. Let india-rubl^er goods alone ; the field is no place for a sweat-bath. Qualifications for Success. — With the outfit just indicated you command all the required appliances that you can buy, and the rest lies with yourself. Success hangs upon your, own exertions ; upon your energy, industry, and perseverance ; your knowledge and skill ; your zeal and enthusiasm, in collecting birds, much as in other affairs of life. But that your efforts — maiden attempts they must once have been if they be not such now — may be directed to best advantage, further instructions may not be unacceptable. To Carry a Gun without peril to human life or limb is the ft 5 c of its use, "There's death in the pot." Such constant cai^e is required to avoid accidents that no man can give it by continual voluntary or conscious effort : safe carriage of the gun must become an unconscious habit, fixed as the movements of an automaton. The golden rule and whole secret is : the muzzle must never sweep the horizon ; accidental discharge should send the shot into the ground before your feet, or away up in the air. There are several safe and easy ways of holding a piece ; they will be employed by turns to relieve particular muscles when fatigued. 1. Hold it in the hollow of the arm (preferably the left, as you can recover to aim in less time than from the right), across the front of your person, the hand on the grip, the muzzle elevated about 45°. 2. Hang it by the trigger-guard hitched over the forearm brought round to the bi'east, the stock passing behind the upper arm, the muzzle pointing to the ground a pace or so in front of you. 3. Shoulder it, the hand on the grip or heel-plate, the muzzle pointing upward at least 45°. 4. FIELD ORNITHOLOGY Shoulder it reversed, the hand grasping the barrels about their middle, the muzzle pointing forward and downward ; this is per- fectly admissible, but is the most awkward position of all to recover from. Always carry a loaded gun at half-cock, unless you are about to shoot. The best guns are now fitted with rebounding locks, having a device by which the hammer is throw^n back to half-cock as soon as the blow is delivered on the firing-pin. This admirable device is a great safeguard, and is particularly eligible for breech- loaders, as the barrels may be unlocked and relocked without touching the hammers. Unless the lock fail, accidental discharge is impossible, except under these circumstances : (a) a direct blow on the nipple or pin ; (h) catching of both hammer and trigger simultaneously, drawing back of the former and its release whilst the trigger is still held, — the chances against which are simply incalculable. Full-cock, ticklish as it seems, is safer than no-cock, Avhen a tap on the hammer, or a slight catch and release of the hammer, may cause discharge. Never let the muzzle of a loaded gun point toward your own person for a single instant. Get your gun over fences, or into boats or carriages, before you get over or in yourself, or at any rate no later. Remove caps or cartridges on entering a house. Never aim a gun, loaded or not, at any object, unless you mean to press the trigger. Never put a loaded gun away long enough to forget whether it is loaded or not. Never leave a loaded gun to be found by others under circumstances reasonably presupposing it to be unloaded. Never put a gun where it can be knocked doAvn by a dog or a child. Never imagine that there can be any excuse for putting away a breech-loader loaded under any circumstances. Never forget that the idiots who kill people because they " didn't know it was loaded," are perennial. Never forget that though a gunning accident may be sometimes interpreted (from a false standpoint) as a "dispensation of Provi- dence," such dispensations happen oftenest to the careless. To Clean a Gun properly requires some knowledge, more good temper, and most " elbow-grease " ; it is dirty, disagreeable, inevitable work, which laziness, business, tiredness, indifference, and good taste wdll by turns tempt you to shirk. After a hunt you are tired, have your clothes to change, a meal to eat, a lot of birds to skin, a journal to write up. If you " sub-let " the contract, the chances are it is but half fulfilled ; serve yourself, if you want to be well served. If you cannot find time for a regular cleaning, an intolerably foul gun may be made to do another day's work by swabbing for a few moments Avith a wet (not dripping) rag, and then with an oiled one. For the full wash use cold water first ; it loosens dirt better than hot water. Set the l^arrels in a pail of water j wrap the end of the cleaning rod with tow or cloth, and SEC. I IMPLEMENTS FOR COLLECTING, AND THEIR USE ii pump away till your arms ache. Change the rag or tow, and the water too, till they both stay clean for all the swabbing you can do. Then use boiling water till the barrels are well heated ; wipe as dry as possible inside and out, and set them by a fire. Finish with a light oiling, inside and out ; touch up all the metal about the stock, and polish the wood-work. Do not remove the locks oftener than is necessary ; every time they are taken out, something of the exquisite fitting that marks a good gun may be lost ; as long as they work smoothly take it for granted they are all right. To keep a gun well, under long disuse, it should have had a particu- larly thorough cleaning ; the chambers should be packed with greasy tow ; greased wads may be rammed at intervals along the barrels ; or the barrels may be filled with melted tallow. Neat's- foot is recommended as the best easily procured oil ; the porpoise- oil which is used by watchmakers is the very best ; the oil made for use on sewing-machines is excellent ; " olive " oil (made of lard) for table use answers the purpose. The quality of an oil may be improved by putting in it a few tacks, or scrajDS of zinc, — the oil expends its rusting capacity in oxidising the metal. Inferior oils get " sticky." One of the best preventives of rust is mercurial ("blue") ointment; it may be freely used. Kerosene will remove rust ; but use it sparingly, for it " eats " sound metal too. To Load a Gun effectively requires something more than knowledge of the facts that the powder should go in before the shot, and that each should have a Avad atop. The most nearly universal fault is use of too much shot for the amount of powder ; and the next, too much of both. The rule is hulk for hdk of powder and shot. If not exactly this, then rather less shot than powder. It is absurd to suppose, as some persons do who ought to know better, that the more shot in a gun the greater the chances of kill- ing. The projectile force of a charge cannot possibly be greater than the vis inerticc of the gun as held by the shooter. The explo- sion is manifested in all directions, and blows the shot in one Avay simply because it has no other escape. If the resistance in front of the powder were greater than elsewhere, the shot would not budge, but the gun would fly backward, or burst. This always reminds me of Lord Dundreary's famous conundrum — Why does a dog wag his tail 1 Because he is bigger than his tail ; otherwise the tail would wag him. A gun shoots shot because the gun is the heavier ; otherwise the shot would shoot the gun. Every unneces- sary pellet is a pellet against you, not against the game. The experienced sportsman uses about one-third less shot than the tyro, with proportionally better result, other things being equal. As to powder, moreover, a gun can only burn just so much, and every grain blown out unburnt is Avasted. No express directions for FIELD ORNITHOLOGY absolute weight or measures of either powder or shot can be given ; in fact, different guns take as their most effective charge such a varial)le amount of ammunition, that one of the first things you have to learn about your own arm is, its normal charge -gauge. Find out, by assiduous target practice, what absolute amounts (and to a slight degree, what relative proportion) of powder and shot are required to shoot the farthest and distribute the pellets most evenly. This practice, furthermore, will acquaint you with your gun's capa- cities in every respect. You should learn exactly what it will and what it will not do, so as to feel perfect confidence in your arm within a certain range, and to waste no shots in attempting miracles. Immoderate recoil is a pretty sure sign that the gun is overloaded, or otherwise wrongly charged \ and all force of recoil is subtracted from the impulse of the shot. It is useless to ram powder very hard ; two or three smart taps of the rod will suffice, and more will not increase the explosive force. On the shot the wad should simply be pressed close enough to fix the pellets immovably. These directions apply to the charging of metal or paper cartridges as well as to loading by the muzzle. The latter operation is rarely required, now that guns of every grade are made to break at the breech. Finally, let me impress upon you the expediency of Ikjlit loading in your routine collecting. Three-fourths of your shots need not bring into action the gun's full powers of execution. You will shoot more birds under than over ,thirty yards ; not a few you must secure, if at all, at ten or fifteen yards ; and your object is always to kill them with the least possible damage to the plumage. I have, on particular occasions, loaded even down to one third oz. of shot and one and a half dr. of powder. There is astonishing force compressed in a few grains of powder ; an aston- ishing number of pellets in the smallest load of mustard-seed. To Shoot successfully is an art which may be acquired by practice, and can be learned only in the school of experience. No general directions will make you a good shot, any more than a proficient in music or painting. To tell you that in order to hit a bird you must point the gun at it and press the trigger, is like saying that to play on the fiddle you must shove the bow across the strings with one hand while you finger them with the other ; in either case the result is the same, a noise, but neither music nor game. Nor is it possible for every one to become an artist in gunnery ; a " crack-shot," like a poet, is born, not made. For myself, I make no pretensions to genius in that direction ; for although I generally make fair bags, and have destroyed many thousand birds in my time, this is rather owing to some familiarity I have gained with the habits of birds, and a certain knack, acquired by long practice, of picking them out of trees and bushes, than to SEC. I IMPLEMENTS FOR COLLECTING, AND THEIR USE skilful shooting from the sportsman's standpoint ; in fact, if I cut down two or three birds on the wing without a miss I am working quite up to my average in that line. But any one not purblind or a " butter-fingers " can become a reasonably fair shot by practice and do good collecting. It is not so hard, after all, to sight a "un correctly on an immovable object, and collecting differs from sport- ing proper in this, that comparatively few birds are shot on the wing. But I do not mean to imply that it requires less skill to collect successfully than to secure game ; on the contrary, it is finer shooting, I think, to drop a warbler skipping about a tree-top than to stop a quail at full speed ; while hitting a sparrow that springs from the grass at one's feet to flicker in sight a few seconds and disappear is the most difiicult of all shooting. Besides, a crack shot, as understood, aims unconsciously, with mechanical accuracy and certitude of hitting ; he simply wills, and the trained muscles obey without his superintendence, just as the fingers form letters with the pen in writing ; whereas the collector must usually supervise his muscles all through the act and see that they mind. In spite of the proportion of snap-shots of all sorts you will have to take, your collecting shots, as a rule, are made with deliberate aim. There is much the same difference, on the whole, between the sportsman's work and the collector's, that there is between shot-^un and rifle practice, collecting being comparable to the latter. It is generally understood that the acme of skill with the two weapons is an incompatibility \ and, certainly, the best shot is not always the best collector, even supposing the two to be on a par in their know- ledge of birds' haunts and habits. Still, a hopelessly poor shot can only attain fair results by extraordinary diligence and perseverance. Certain principles of shooting may perhaps be reduced to words. Aim deliberately directly at an immovable object at fair range. Hold over a motionless object when far off, as the trajectory of the shot curves downward. Hold a little to one side of a stationary object when very near, preferring rather to take the chances of missing it with the peripheral pellets, than of hopelessly mutilating it with the main body of the charge. Fire at the first fair aim, without trying to improve what is good enough already. Never " pull " the trigger, but fress it. Bear the shock of discharge with- out flinching. In shooting on the wing, fire the instant the heel of the gun taps your shoulder ; you will miss at first, but by and by the birds will begin to drop, and you will have laid the founda- tion of good shooting, the knack of " covering " a bird unconsciously. The habit of " poking " after a bird on the wing is an almost incur- able vice, and may keep you a poor shot all your life. (The col- lector's frequent necessity of poking after little birds in the bush is what so oftern hinders him from acquiring brilliant execution.) Aim 14 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i ahead of a flying bird — the calculation to be made varies, according to the distance of the object, its velocity, its course and the wind, from a few inches to several feet ; practice will finally render it intuitive. § 2.— DOGS A Good Dog is one of the most faithful, respectful, affec- tionate, and sensible of brutes ; deference to such rare qualities demands a chapter, however brief. A trained dog is the indis- pensable servant of the sportsman in his pursuit of most kinds of game ; but I trust I am guilty of no discourtesy to the noble animal, when I say that he is a luxury rather than a necessity to the collector — a pleasant companion, who knows almost everything except how to talk, who converses ^\^th his eyes and ears and tail, shares comforts and discomforts with equal alacrity, and occasion- ally makes himself useful. So far as a collector's work tallies with that of a sportsman, the dog is equally useful to both ; but finding and telling of game aside, your dog's services are restricted to companionship and retrieving. He may, indeed, flush many sorts of birds for you ; luit he does it, if at all, at random, while capering about ; for the brute intellect is limited after all, and can- not comprehend a naturalist. The best trained setter or pointer that ever marked a quail could not be made to understand what you are about, and it would ruin him for sporting purposes if he did. Take a well-bred dog out with you, and the chances are he will soon trot home in disgust at your performances with jack- sparrows and tomtits. It implies such a perversion of a good dog's instincts to make him really a useful servant of the collector, that I am half inclined to say nothing about retrieving, and tell you to make a companion of your dog, or let him alone. I was followed for several years by " the best dog I ever saw " (every one's gun, dog, and child is the best ever seen), and a first-rate retriever ; yet I always preferred, when practicable, to pick up my own birds, rather than let a delicate plumage into a dog's mouth, and scolded away the poor brute so often, that she very properly returned the compliment, in the end, by retrieving just when she felt like it. However, we remained the best of friends. Any good setter, pointer, or spaniel, and some kinds of curs, may be trained to retrieve. The great point is to teach them not to " mouth " a bird ; it may be accomplished by sticking pins in the ball with which their early lessons are taught. Such dogs are particularly useful in bringing birds out of the water, and in searching for them when lost. One point in training should never be neglected : ■ teach a dog SEC. Ill SUGGESTIO.YS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIELD- WORK 15 what "to heel" means, and make him obey this command. A riotous brute is simply unendurable under any circumstances. § .3.— VARIOUS SUGGESTIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIELD-AVORK To be a good Collector, and nothing more, is a small affair ; great skill may be acquired in the art, without a single quality commanding respect. One of the most vulgar, brutal, and ignorant men I ever knew Av^as a sharp collector and an excellent taxidermist. Collecting stands much in the same relation to orni- thology that the useful and indispensable office of an apothecary bears to the duties of a physician. A field-naturalist is always more or less of a collector ; the latter is sometimes found to know almost nothing of natiural history worth knowing. The true orni- thologist goes out to study birds alive and destroys some of them simply because that is the only way of learning their structure and technical characters. There is much more about a bird than can be discovered in its dead body, — how much more, then, than can be found out from its stuffed skin ! In my humble opinion the man who only gathers birds, as a miser money, to swell his cabinet, and that other man who gloats, as miser-like, over the same hoard, both work on a })lane far beneath where the enlightened naturalist stands. One looks at Nature, and never knows that she is beautiful ; the other knows she is beautiful, as even a corpse may be ; the naturalist catches her sentient expression, and knows how beautiful she is ! I would have you to know and love her ; for fairer mis- tress never swayed the heart of man. Aim high ! — press on, and leave the half-way house of mere collectorship far behind in your pursuit of a delightful study, nor fancy the closet its goal. Birds may be sought anywhere, at any time ; they should be sought everywhere, at all times. Some come about your door- step to tell their stories unasked. Others spring up before you as you stroll in the field, like the flowers that enticed the feet of Proserpine. Birds flit by as you measure the tired roadside, lend- ing a tithe of their life to quicken your dusty stej^s. They disport overhead at hide-and-seek with the foliage as you loiter in the shade of the forest, and their music now answers the sigh of the tree-tops, now ripples an echo to the voice of the brook. But you will not always so pluck a thornless rose. Birds hedge themselves about with a bristling girdle of brier and bramble you cannot break ; they build their tiny castles in the air surrounded by impassable moats, and the drawbridges are never down. They crown the i6 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY parti mountain-top you may lose your breath to climb ; they sprinkle the desert where your parched lips may find no cooling draught ; they fleck the snow-wreath when the nipping blast may make you turn your back ; they breathe unharmed the pestilent vapours of the swamp that mean disease, if not death, for you ; they outride the storm at sea that sends strong men to their last account. "Where now will you look for birds % And yet, as skilled labour is always most productive, so expert search yields more than random or blundering pursuit. The more varied the face of a country, the more various its birds. A place all plain, all marsh, all woodland, yields its particular set of birds, perhaps in profusion ; but the kinds will be limited in number. It is of first importance to remember this, when you are so fortunate as to have choice of a collecting-ground ; and it will guide your steps aright in a day's walk anywhere, for it will make you leave covert for open, wet for dry, high for low, and back again. Well- watered country is more fruitful of bird-life than desert or prairie ; warm regions are more productive than cold ones. As a rule, variety and abundance of birds are in direct ratio to diversity and luxuriance of vegetation. Your most valuable as well as largest bags may be made in the regions most favoured botanically, up to the point where exuberance of plant -growth mechanically opposes your operations. Search for particular Birds can only be well directed by a knowledge of their special haunts and habits, and is one of the mysteries of wood-craft to be solved by long experience and close observation. Here is where the true naturalist bears himself wdth conscious pride and strength, winning laurels that become him, and do honour to his calling. AVhere to find game (" game " is anything that vulgar people do not ridicule you for shooting) of all the kinds we have in this country has been so often and so minutely detailed in sporting-works that it need not be here enlarged upon, especially since, being the best known, game-birds are the least valuable of ornithological material. Most large or otherwise conspicuous birds have very special haunts that may be soon learned ; and as a rule such rank next after game in ornithological disesteem. Birds of prey are an exception to these statements ; they range everywhere, and most of them are worth securing. Hawks will unwittingly fly in your way oftener than they will allow you to approach them when perched : be ready for them. Owls will be startled out of their retreats in thick bushes, dense foliage, and hollow trees, in the daytime ; if hunting them at night, good aim in the dark may be taken by rubbing a wet lucifer match on the sight of the gun, causing a momentary glimmer. Large and small waders are to be found by any water's edge, in open marshes, and often on dry SEC. Ill SUGGESTIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIELD- WORK i~ plains ; the herons more particularly in heavy bogs and dense swamps. Under cover, waders are oftenest approached by stealtii ; in the open, by strategy ; but most of the smaller kinds require the exercise of no special precautions. Swimming -birds, aside from water-fowl (as the "game" kinds are called), are generally shot from a boat, as they fl}'' past ; but at their breeding-places many kinds that congregate in vast numbers are readily reached. There is a knack of shooting loons and grebes on the water ; if they are to be reached at all by the shot it will be by aiming not directly at them but at the water just in front of them. They do not go under just where they float, but kick up behind like a jumping-jack and plunge forward. Eails and several kinds of sparrows are confined to reedy marshes. But why prolong such desultory remarks ? Little can be said to the point without at least a miniature treatise on ornithology ; and I have not yet even alluded to the diversified host of small insectivorous and granivorous birds that fill our woods and fields. The very existence of most of these is unknown to all but the initiated ; yet they include the treasures of the orni- thologist. Some are plain and humble, others are among the most beautiful objects in nature ; but most agree in being small, and therefore liable to be overlooked. The sum o-f my advice about them must be brief. Get over as much ground, both wooded and open, as you can thoroughly examine in a day's tramp, and go out as many days as you can. It is not. always necessary, however, to keep on the tramp, especially during the migration of the restless insectivorous species. One may often shoot for hours without moving more than a few yards, by selecting a favourable locality and allowing the birds to come to him as they pass in varied troops through the low woodlands or swampy thickets. Keep your eyes and ears wide open. Look out for every rustling leaf and swaying twig and bending blade of grass. Hearken to every note, however faint ; when there is no sound, listen for a chirp. Habitually move as noiselessly as possible. Keep your gun always ready. Improve every opportunity of studying a bird you do not ^vish to destroy ; you may often make observations more valuable than the specimen. Let this be the rule with all birds you recognise. But I fear I must tell you to shoot an unknown bird on sight ; it may give you the slip in a moment and a prize may be lost. One of the most fascinating things about field-work is its uncertainty ; you never know what's in store for you as you start out ; you never can tell what will happen next ; surprises are always in order, and excite- ment is continually whetted on the chances of the varied chase. For myself, the time is past, happily or not, when every bird was an agreeable surprise, for dewdrops do not last all day ; but I have never yet walked in the woods without learning something C FIELD ORNITHOLOGY pleasant that I did not know before. I should consider a bird new to science ample reward for a month's steady work ; one bird new to a locality would repay a week's search ; a day is happily spent that shows me any bird that I never saw alive before. How then can you, with so much before you, keep out of the woods another minute % All Times are good times to go a -shooting ; but some are better than others. {a) Time of year. In all temperate latitudes, spring and fall — periods of migration with most birds — are the most profitable seasons for collecting. Not only are birds then most numerous, both as species and as individuals, and most active, so as to be the more readily found, but they include a far larger proportion of rare and valuable kinds. In every locality in this country the periodical visitants outnumber the permanent residents ; in most regions the number of regular migrants, that simply pass through in the spring and fall, equals or exceeds that of either of the sets of species that come from the south in spring to breed during the summer, or from the north to spend the winter. Far north, of course, on or near the limit of the vernal migration, where there are few if any migrants, and where the winter birds are extremely few, nearly all the biixl-fauna is composed of " summer visitants " ; far south the reverse is somewhat the case, though with many qualifications. Between these extremes, what is conventionally known as " a season " means the period of the vernal or autumnal migration. Look out, then, for " the season," and work all through it at a rate you could not possibly sustain the year around. (h) Time of clay. Early in the morning and late in the afternoon are the best times for birds. There is a mysterious something in these diurnal crises that sets bird-life astir, over and above what is explain- able by the simple fact that they are the transition periods from repose to activity, or the reverse. Subtle meteorological changes occur ; various delicate instruments used in physicists' researches are sometimes inexplicably disturbed ; diseases have often their turning point for better or worse ; people are apt to be born or die ; and the susceptible organisms of birds manifest various excite- ments. Whatever the operative influence, the fact is, birds are particularly lively at such hours. In the dark they rest — most of them do ; at noonday, again, they are comparatively still ; between these times they are passing to or from their feeding grounds or roosting places ; they are foraging for food, they are singing ; at any rate, they are in motion. Many migratory birds (among them warblers, etc.) perform their journeys by night; just at daybreak they may be seen to descend from the upper regions, rest a Avhile, and then move about briskly, singing and searching for food. Their meal taken, they recuperate by resting till towards evening ; feed again and are off for the night. If you have had some experience, SEC. Ill SUGGESTION'S AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIELD-WORK 19 don't you remember what a fine spurt you made early that morning ? — how many unex})ected shots offered as you trudged home behited that evening % Now I am no fowl, and have no desire to adopt the habits of the hen-yard ; I have my opinion of those who like the world before it is aired ; I think it served the worm right for getting up, when caught by the early bird ; nevertheless I go shoot- ing betimes in the morning, and would walk all night to find a rare bird at daylight, {c) Weather. It rarely occurs in this country that either heat or cold is unendurably severe ; but extremes of temperature are unfavourable, for two reasons : they both occasion great personal discomfort ; and in one extreme only a few hardy birds will be found, while in the other most birds are languid, dis- posed to seek shelter, and therefore less likely to be found. A still, cloudy day of moderate temperature offers as a rule the best chance ; among other reasons, there is no sun to blind the eyes, as always occurs on a bright day in one direction, particularly when the sun is low. While a bright day has its good influence in set- ting many birds astir, some others are most easily approached in heavy or falling weather. Some kinds are more likely to be secured during a light snowfall, or after a storm. Singular as it may seem, a thoroughly wet day offers some peculiar inducements to the col- lector. I cannot well specify them, but I heartily indorse a remark John Cassin once made to me : "I like," said he, " to go shooting in the rain sometimes ; there are some curious things to be learned about birds when the trees are dripping ; things, too, that have not yet found their way into the books." How many Birds of the Same Kind do you want? — All you can get — with some reasonable limitations ; say fifty or a hundred of any but the most abundant and widely diffused species. You may often be provoked with your friend for speaking of some bird he shot, but did not bring you, because, he says, " Why, you've got one like that ! " Birdskins are capital ; capital unemployed may be useless, but can never be worthless. Birdskins are a medium of exchange among ornithologists the world over ; they represent value — money value and scientific value. If you have more of one kind than you can use, exchange with some one for species you lack ; both parties to the transaction are equally benefited. Let me bring this matter under several heads, (a.) Your own series of skins of any species is incomplete until it contains at least one example of each sex, of every normal state of plumage, and every normal transition stage of plumage, and further illustrates the principal abnormal variations in size, form, and colour to which the species may be subject ; I will even add that every different faunal area the bird is known to inhabit should be represented by a specimen, particularly if there be anything exceptional in the FIELD ORNITHOLOGY geographical distribution of the species. Any additional specimens to all such are your only " duplicates, " propei'ly speaking. (&) Birds vary so much in their size, form, and colouring, that a " spe- cific character " can only be precisely determined from examination of a large number of specimens, shot at different times, in different places ; still less can the " limits of variation " in these respects be settled without ample materials, (c) The rarity of any bird is an arbitrary and fluctuating consideration, because in the nature of the case there can be no natural unit of comparison, nor standard of appreciation. It may be said, in general terms, no bird is actually " rare." With a few possible exceptions, as in the cases of birds occupying extraordinarily limited areas, like some of the birds-of- paradise, or about to become extinct, like the pied duck,^ enough birds of all kinds exist to overstock every public and private collec- tion in the world, without sensible diminution of their numbers. " Earity " or the reverse is only predicable upon the accidental (so to speak) circumstances that throw, or tend to throw, specimens into naturalists' hands. Accessibility is the variable element in every case. The fulmar petrel "^ is said (on what authority I know not) to exceed any other bird in its aggregate of individuals ; how do the skins of that bird you have handled compare in number with speci- mens you have seen of the " rare " warbler of your own vicinity ? All birds are common somewhere at some season : the point is, have collectors been there at the time ? Moreover, even the arbitrary appreciation of " rarity " is fluctuating, and may change at any time; long- sought and highly-prized birds are liable to appear suddenly in great numbers in places that knew them not before ; a single heavy invoice of a bird from some distant or little- explored region may at once stock the market, and depreciate the current value of the species to almost nothing. For example, Bau'd's bunting^ and Sprague's lark"^ remained for thirty years among special desiderata, only one specimen of the former and two or three of the latter being known. Yet they are two of the most abundant birds of Dakota, where in 1873 I took as many of both as I desired ; and sj)ecimens enough have lately been secured to stock all the leading museums of both Europe and America, (d) Some practical deductions are to be made from these premisses. Your object is to make yourself acquainted with all the birds of your vicinity, and to preserve a complete suite of specimens of -every species. Begin by shooting every bird you can, coupling this sad destruction, however, with the closest observations upon habits. You will very soon fill your series of a few kinds, that you find almost everywhere, almost daily. Then if you are in a ^ Camptolcemus lahradoriiis. " Fulmarus glacialis. ^ Passer cuius {Centronyx) bairdi. ^ Anthus {^'eocorys) spraguei. SEC. Ill SUGGESTIONS AND DIREC710NS FOR FIELD-WORK 21 region the ornithology of which is well known, at once stop killing these common birds — they are in every collection. Keep an eye on them, studying them always, but turn your actual pursuit into other channels, until in this way, gradually eliminating the un- desirables, you exhaust the bird-fauna as far as possible (you will not quite exhaust it — at least for many years). But if you are in a new or little-known locality, I had almost said the very reverse course is the best. The chances are that the most abundant and character- istic birds there are " rare " in collections. Many a bird's range is quite restricted : you may happen to be just at its metropolis ; seize the opportunity, and get good store, — yes, up to fifty or a hundred ; all you can spare will be thankfully received by those who have none. Quite as likely, birds that are scarce just where you happen to be, are so only because you are on the edge of their habitat, and are plentiful in more accessible regions. But, rare or not, it is always a point to determine the exact geographical dis- tribution of a species ; and this is fixed best by having specimens to tell each its own tale, from as many different and widely-separated localities as possible. This alone warrants procuring one or more specimens in every locality ; the commonest bird acquires a certain value if it be captured away from its ordinary range. But let all your justifiable destruction of birds be tempered with mercy ; your humanity will be continually shocked with the havoc you work, and should never permit you to take life wantonly. Never shoot a bird you do not fully intend to preserve, or to utilise in some proper way. Bird -life is too beautiful a thing to destroy to no purpose ; too sacred a thing, like all life, to be sacrificed, unless the tribute is hallowed by worthiness of motive. "Not a sparrow falleth to the ground without His notice." I should not neglect to speak particularly of the care to be taken to secure full suites oi females. Most miscellaneous collections con- tain four or more males to every female — a disprojDortion that should be as far reduced as possible. The reason for this disparity is obvious : females are usually more shy and retiring in disposition, and less frequently noticed ; while their smaller size and plainer plumage, as a rule, further favour their concealment. The diflerence in colour- ing is greatest among those groups where the males are most richly clad, and the shyness of the mother birds is most marked during the breeding season, just when the males, full of song, and in their nuptial attire, become most conspicuous. It is often worth while to neglect the gay Benedicts, to trace out and secure the plainer but not less interesting females. This pursuit, moreover, often leads to discovery of the nests and eggs, — an important consideration. Although both sexes are generally found together when breeding, and mixing indiscriminately at other seasons, they often go in sepa- FIELD ORNITHOLOGY rate flocks, and often migrate independently of each other ; in this case the males usually in advance. Towards the end of the passage of some warblers, for instance, we may get almost nothing but females, all our sj^ecimens of a few days before having been males. The notable exceptions to the rule of smaller size of the female are among rapacious birds and many waders, though in these last the disj)arity is not so marked. I only recall one instance, among English birds, of the female being more richly coloured than the male — the phalaropes. When the sexes are notably different in adult life, the young of both sexes usually resemble the adult female, the young males gradually assuming their distinctive characters. When the adults of both sexes are alike, the young commonly differ from them. In the same connection I wish to urge a point, the importance of which is often overlooked ; it is our jDractical interpretation of the adage, " a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." Always keep the first specimen you secure of a sjDecies till you get another, no matter how common the species, how poor the specimen, or how certain you may feel of getting others. Your most reason- able calculations may come to naught, from a variety of circum- stances, and any specimen is better than no specimen, on general principles. And in general, do not, if you can help it, discard any specimen in the field. No tyro can tell what will prove valuable and what not ; while even the expert may regret to find that a point comes up which a specimen he injudiciously discarded might have determined. Let a collection be " weeded out," if at all, only after deliberate and mature examination, when the scientific results it afibrds have been elaborated by a competent ornithologist ; and even then, the refuse (with certain limitations) had better be put where it will do some good, than be destroyed utterly. If forced to reduce bulk, owing to limited facilities for transportation in the field (as too often happens), throw away according to size, other things being equal. Given only so many cubic inches or feet, eliminate the few large birds which take up the space that Avould contain fifty or a hundred different little ones. If you have a fine large eagle or pelican, for instance, throw it away first, and follow it with your ducks, geese, etc. In this way, the bulk of a large miscel- laneous collection may be reduced one-half, perhaps, with very little depreciation of its actual value. The same jirinciple may be extended to other collections in natural history (excepting fossils, which are alwa3^s weighty, if not also bulky) ; very few birdskins, indeed, being as valuable contributions to science as, for example, a vial of insects that occupies no more room may prove to be. What is " A Good Day's Work " ? — Fifty birds shot, their skins preserved, and observations recorded, is a very good day's work ; it SEC. Ill SUGGESTIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIEID-WORK 23 is sharp practice, even when birds are plentiful. I never knew a person to average anywhere near it ; even during the " season " such work cannot possibly be sustained. You may, of course, by a murderous discharge into a flock, get a hundred or more in a moment ; but I refer to collecting a fair variety of birds. You will do very well if you average a dozen a day during the seasons. I doubt whether any collector ever averaged as many the year around ; it would be over four thousand specimens annually. The greatest number I ever procured and prepared in one day was forty, and I have not often gone over twenty. Even when collecting regularly and assiduously, I am satisfied to average a dozen a day during the migrations, and one-third or one-fourth as many the rest of the year. Probably this implies the shooting of about one in five not skinned for various reasons, as mutilation, decay, or want of time. Approaching Birds. — There is little if any trouble in getting near enough to shoot most birds. With notable exceptions, they are harder to see Avhen near enough, or to hit when seen ; particularly small birds that are almost incessantly in motion. As a rule — and a curious one it is — difhculty of approach is in direct ratio to the size of the bird ; it is perhaps because large conspicuous birds are objects of more general pursuit than the little ones you ordinarily search for. The qualities that birds possess for self-preservation may be called wariness in large birds, shyness in small ones. The former make off' knowingly from a suspicious object ; the latter fly from anything that is strange to them, be it dangerous or not. This is strikingly illustrated in the behaviour of small birds in the wilderness, as contrasted with their actions about towns ; they are more timid under the former circumstances than when grown accustomed to the presence of man. It is just the reverse with a hawk or raven, for instance ; in populous districts they spend much of their time in trying to save their skins, while in a new country they have not learned, like Indians, that a white man is " mighty uncertain." In stealing on a shy bird, you will of course take ad- vantage of any cover that may ofl"er, as inequalities of the ground, thick bushes, the trunks of trees ; and it is often worth while to make a considerable detour to secure unobserved approach. I think that birds are more likely, as a rule, to be frightened away by the movements of the collector, than by his simple presence, however near, and that they are more afraid of noise than of mere motion. Crackling of twigs and rustling of leaves are sharp sounds, though not loud ones ; you may have sometimes been surprised to find how distinctly you could hear the movements of a horse or cow in underbrush at some distance. Birds have sharp ears for such sounds. Form a habit of stealthy movement ; it tells, in the long run, in comparison with lumbering tread. There are no special 24 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i precautions to be taken in shooting through high open forest ; you have only to saunter along with your eyes in the tree-tops. It is ordinarily the easiest and on the whole the most remunerative path of the collector. In traversing fields and meadows move briskly, your principal object being to flush birds out of the grass ; and as most of your shots will be snap ones, keep in readiness for instant action. Excellent and varied shooting is to be had along the hedgerows, and in the rank herbage that fringes fences. It is best to keep at a little distance, yet near enough to arouse all the birds as you pass ; you may catch them on wing, or pick them off just as they settle after a short flight. In this shooting, two persons, one on each side, can together do more than twice as much work as one. Thickets and tangled undergrowth are favourite resorts of many birds ; but when very close, or, as often happens, over miry ground, they are hard places to shoot in. As you come thrashing through the brush, the little inhabitants are scared into deeper recesses ; but if you keej) still a few minutes in some favourable spot, they are reassured, and will often come back to take a peep at you. A good deal of standing still will repay you at such times ; needless to add, you cannot be too lightly loaded for such shooting, when birds are mostly out of sight if a dozen yards off. When yourself concealed in a thicket, and no birds appear, you can often call numbers about you by a simple artifice. Apply the back of your hand to your slightly parted lips, and suck in air; it makes a nondescript screeping noise, variable in intonation at your whim, and some of the sounds resemble the cries of a wounded bird, or a young one in distress. It wakes up the whole neigh- bourhood, and sometimes puts certain birds almost beside them- selves, particularly in the breeding season. Torturing a wounded bird to make it scream in agony accomplishes the same result, but of course is only permissible under great exigency. In penetrating swamps and marshes, the best advice I can give you is to tell you to get along the best way you can. Shooting on perfectly open ground offers much the same case ; you must be left to your own devices. I will say, however, you can ride on horseback, or even in a buggy, nearer birds than they will allow you to walk up to them. Sportsmen take advantage of this to get within a shot of the upland plover, usually a very wary bird in populous districts ; I have driven right into a flock of wild geese ; in California they often train a bullock to graze gradually up to geese, the gunner being hidden by its body. There is one trick worth knowing ; it is not to let a bird that has seen you know by your action that you have seen it, but to keep on unconcernedly, gradually sidling nearer. I have secured many hawks in this way, when the bird would have flown off at the first stej) of direct approach. Number- SEC. in SUGGESTIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIELD-WORK 2 less other little arts will come to you as your wood - craft matures. Recovering' Birds. — It is not always that you secure the birds you kill ; you may not be able to find them, or you may see them lying, perhaps but a few feet off, in a spot practically inaccessible. Under such circumstances a retriever does excellent service, as already hinted ; he is equally useful when a bird properly "marked down " is not found there, having fluttered or run away and hidden elsewhere. The most difficult of all places to find birds is among reeds, the sameness of which makes it almost impossible to redis- cover a spot whence the eye has once wandered, while the peculiar growth allows birds to slip far down out of sight. In rank grass or weeds, when you have walked up with your eye fixed on the spot where the bird seemed to fall, yet failed to discover it, drop your cap or handkerchief for a mark, and hunt around it as a centre, in enlarging circles. In thickets, make a bee-line for the spot, if possible keeping your eye on the spray from which the bird fell, and not forgetting where you stood on firing ; you may require to come back to the spot and take a new departure. You will not seldom see a bird just shot at fly off as if unharmed, when really it will drop dead in a few moments. In all cases, therefore, when the bird does not drop at the shot, follow it with your eyes as far as you can ; if you see it finally dro}?, or even flutter languidly down- ward, mark it on the principles just mentioned, and go in search. Make every endeavour to secure wounded birds, on the score of humanity ; they should not be left to pine away and die in linger- ing misery if it can possibly be avoided. Killing- Wounded Birds. — You will often recover winged birds, as full of life as before the bone was broken ; and others too griev- ously hurt to fly, yet far from death. Your object is to kill them as quickly and painlessly as possible, without injuring the plumage. This is to be accomplished, with all small birds, by suftbcation. The respiration and circulation of birds is very active, and most of them die in a few moments if the lungs are so compressed that they cannot breathe. Squeeze the bird tightly across the chest, under the wings, thumb on one side, middle finger on the other, forefinger pressed in the hollow at the root of the neck, between the forks of the merrythought. Press firmly, hard enough to fix the chest immovably and compress the lungs, but not to break in the ribs. The bird will make vigorous but ineffectual efforts to breathe, when the muscles will contract spasmodically ; but in a moment more, the system relaxes with a painful shiver, light fades from the eyes, and the lids close. I assure you, it will make you wince the first few times ; you had better hold the poor creature behind you. You can tell by its limp feel and motionlcssness when 26 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i it is dead, without watching the sad struggle. Large birds cannot be dealt with in this way ; I would as soon attempt to throttle a dog as a loon, for instance, upon which all the pressure you can give makes no sensible impression. A winged hawk, again, will throw itself on its back as you come up, and show such good fight with beak and talons, that you may be quite severely scratched in the encounter : meanwhile the struggling bird may be bespattering its plumage with blood. In such a case — in any case of a large bird making decided resistance — I think it best to step back a few paces and settle the matter with a light charge of mustard-seed. Any large bird once secured may be speedily despatched by stabbing to the heart with some slender instrument thrust in under the wing — care must be taken too about the bleeding ; or, it may be instantly killed by piercing the brain with a knife introduced into the mouth and driven upward and obliquely backward from the palate. The latter method is preferable, as it leaves no outward sign and causes no bleeding to speak of. With your thumb, you may indent the back part of a small bird's skull so as to compress the cerebellum, which causes instant death. It is useless to compress the windpipe of a bird whose wing is broken near the shoulder, for the bone is hollow, and the bird can breathe through it. Handling Bleeding- Birds. — Bleeding depends altogether upon what part or organ is wounded ; but, other things being equal, violence of the ha3morrhage is usually in direct proportion to the size of the shot-hole; when mustard-seed is used it is ordinarily very trifling, if it occur at all. Blood flows oftener from the orifice of exit of a shot, than from the wound of entrance, for the latter is usually plugged with a little wad of feathers. Bleeding from the mouth or nostrils is the rule when the lungs are wounded. When it occurs, hold up the bird by the feet, and let it drip ; a general squeeze of the body in that position will facilitate the drainage. In general, hold a bird so that a bleeding place is most dependent ; then, pressure about the part will help the flow. A "gob" of blood, which is simply a forming clot, on the plumage may often be dexterously flipped almost clean away with a snap of the finger. It is first-rate joractice to take cotton and forceps into the field to plug up shot-holes, and stop the mouth and nostrils and vent on the spot. I follow the custom of the books in recommending this, but I suspect that only a few of the most leisurely and elegant collectors do so habitually. Shot-holes may be found by gently raising the feathers, or bloAving them aside ; you can of course get only a tiny plug into the wound itself, but it should be one end of a sizable pledget, the rest lying flufty among the feathers. In stopping the mouth or vent, ram the fluff of cotton entirely inside. You cannot conveniently stop up the nostrils of small birds sepa- SEC. Ill SUGGESTIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FIELD-WORK 27 rately ; but take a light cylinder of cotton, lay it transversely across the base of the upper mandible, closely covering the nostrils, and confine it there by tucking each end tightly into the corner of the mouth. In default of such nice fixing as this, a pinch of dry loam pressed on a bleeding spot will plaster itself there and stop further mischief. Never try to ^vij)e off hesix blood that has already wetted the plumage ; you will only make matters worse. Let it dry on, and then — but the treatment of blood-stains, and other soilings of plumage, is given beyond. Carrying Birds Home Safe. — Suppose you have secured a fine sj)ecimen, very likely without a soiled or ruffled feather ; your next care will be to keep it so till you are ready to skin it. But if you pocket or bag it directly, it will be a sorry-looking object before you get home. Each specimen must be separately cared for, by wrapping in stout paper ; writing paper is as good as any, if not the best. It will repay you to prepare a stock of paper before starting out ; your most convenient sizes are those of a half-sheet of note, of letter, and of cap respectively. Either take these, or fold and cut ncAvspaper to correspond. Plenty of paper will go in the breast pockets of the shooting coat. Make a "cornucopia," — the simplest thing in the world, but, like tying a particular knot, hard to explain. Setting the wings closely, adjusting disturbed feathers, and seeing that the bill points straight forward, thrust the bird head-first into one of these paper cones, till it will go no farther, being bound by the bulge of the breast. Let the cone be large enough for the open end to fold over or pinch together entirely beyond the tail. Be particular not to crumple or bend the tail- feathers. Lay the paper cases in the game bag or great pocket so that they very nearly run j^arallel and lie horizontal ; they will carry better than if thrown in at random. Avoid overcrowding the packages, as far as is reasonably jDracticable ; moderate pressure will do no harm, but if great it may make birds bleed afresh, or cause the fluids of a wounded intestine to ooze out and soak the plumage of the belly, — a very bad accident indeed. For similar obvious reasons, do not put a large heavy bird on top of a lot of little ones ; I would sooner sling a hawk or heron over my shoulder, or carry it by hand. If it goes in the bag, see that it gets to the bottom. Avoid putting birds in pockets that are close about your person ; they are almost always unduly pressed, and may gain enough additional warmth from your body to make them begin to decompose before you are ready to skin them. Handle birds no more than is necessary, especially Avhite-plumaged ones ; ten to one your hands are powder-begrimed : and besides, even the warmth and moisture of your palms may tend to injure a delicate feather- ing. Ordinarily pick up a ]:»ird by the feet or bill ; as you need 28 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i both hands to make the cornucopia, let the specimen dangle by the toes from your teeth while you are so employed. In catching at a wounded bird, aim to cover it entirely with your hand ; but what- ever yoTi do, never seize it by the tail, which then will often be left in your hands for your pains. Never grasp wing-tips or tail- feathers ; these large flat quills would get a peculiar crimping all along the webs, very difficult to efface. Finally, I would add, there is a certain knack or art in manipulating, either of a dead bird or a birdskin, by which you may handle it with seeming carelessness and perfect impunity ; whilst the most gingerly fingering of an inexperienced person will leave its rude trace. You will naturally acquire the correct touch ; but it can be neither taught nor described. While the ordinary run of land-birds will be brought home in good order by the foregoing method, some require special precautions. I refer to sea-birds, such as gulls, terns, petrels, etc., shot from a boat. In the first place, the plumage of most of them is, in part at least, white and of exquisite purity. Then, fish-eating birds usually vomit and purge when shot. They are necessarily fished all dripping from the water. They are too large for pocketing. If you put them on the thwarts or elsewhere about the boat, they usually fall off, or are knocked off, into the bilge water ; if you stow them in the cubby-hole, they will assuredly soil by mutual pressure, or by rolling about. It will repay you to pick them from the water by the bill, and shake off all the water you can ; hold them up, or let some one do it, till they are tolerably dry ; plug the mouth, nostrils, and vent, if not also shot-holes; wrap each one separately in a cloth (not paper) or a mass of tow, and pack steadily in a covered box or basket taken on board fi^r this j^urpose. With such precautions as these, birds most liable to be soiled reach the skinning-taljle in perfect order ; and your care will afterward trans- form them into specimens without spot or blemish. § 4.— HYGIENE OF COLLECTORSHIP It is unnecessary to speak of the Healthfulness of a pursuit that, like the collector's occupation, demands regular bodily exercise, and at the same time stimulates the mind by supplying an object, thus calling the whole system into exhilarating action. Yet collect- ing has its perils, not to be overlooked if we would adequately guard against them, as fortunately we may, in most cases, by simple precautions. The dangers of taxidermy itself are elsewhere noticed ; but, besides these, the collector is exposed to vicissitudes of the weather, may endure great fatigue, may breathe miasm, and may be mechanically injured. SEC. IV HYGIENE OF COLLECTORSHIP 29 Accidents from the Gun have been ah-eady noticed; a few special rules will render others little lialjlc to occur. The secret of safe climbing is never to relax one hold until another is secured ; it is equally applicable to scrambling over rocks, a particularly difficult thing to do safely with a loaded gun. Test rotten, slippery, or otherwise suspicious holds before trusting them. In lifting the body up anywhere, keep the mouth shut, breathe through the nostrils, and go slowly. In sivimming, waste no strength unneces- sarily in trying to stem a current ; yield partly, and land obliquely lower down ; if exhausted, float ; the slightest motion of the hands will ordinarily keep the face above water ; and in any event keep your wits collected. In fording deeply, a heavy gtone will strengthen your position. Never sail a boat experimentally ; if you are no sailor, take one Avith you or stay on land. In crossing a high, narrow footpath, never look lower than your feet ; the muscles will work true if not confused with faltering instructions from a giddy brain. On soft ground, see what, if anything, has preceded you ; large hoof-marks generally mean that the way is safe ; if none are found, inquire for yourself before going on. Quicksand is the most, treacherous, because far more dangerous than it looks. Cattle- paths, however erratic, commonly prove the surest way out of a difficult place, whether of uncertain footing or dense undergrowth. Miasm. — Unguarded exposure in malarious regions usually entails sickness, often preventable, however, by due precautions. It is worth knowing, in the first place, that miasmatic poison is most powerful between sunset and sunrise ; more exactly, from the damp of the evening until night-vapours are dissipated ; we may be out in the daytime with comjjarative impunity, where to pass a night would be almost certain disease. If forced to camp out, seek the highest and driest spot, put a good fire on the swamp side, and also, if possible, let trees intervene. Never go out on an empty stomach ; just a cup of coffee and a crust may make a decided difference. Meet the earliest unfavourable symptoms with quinine; I should rather say, if unacclimated, anticipate them with this invaluable agent. Endeavour to maintain high health of all functions by the natural means of regularity and temperance in diet, exercise, and repose. "Taking Cold." — This vague " household word " indicates one or more of a long varied train of unpleasant affections, nearly always traceable to one or the other of only two causes : sudden change of temperature, and unequal distrihntion of temperature on the surface of the person. No extremes of heat or cold can alone effect this result ; persons frozen to death do not " take cold " during the process. But if a part of the body be rapidly cooled, as by evaporation from a wet article of clothing, or by sitting in a 30 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i draught of air, the rest of the surface remaining at an ordinary temperature ; or if the temperature of the whole be suddenly changed by going out into the cold, or by coming into a warm room, there is much liability of trouble. There is an old saying — When the air comes through a hole Say your prayers to save your soul ; and I should think almost any one could get " a cold " with a spoonful of water on the wrist held to a key-hole. Singular as it may seem, sudden warming when cold is more dangerous than the reverse ; every one has noticed how soon the handkerchief is required on entering a heated room on a cold day. Frost-bite offers an extreme illustration of this. As the Irishman said on picking himself up, it was not the fall, but stopping so quickly, that hurt him ; it is not the gradual lowering of the temperature to the freezing-point, but its subsequent sudden elevation, that devitalises the tissue. This is why rubbing with snow, or bathing in cold water, is required to restore safely a frozen part ; the arrested circulation must be very gradually re-established, or inflammation, j^erhaps mortification, ensues. General precautions against taking cold are almost self-evident in this light. There is ordinarily little if any danger to be apprehended from wet clothes, so long as exercise is kept up ; for the glow compensates for the extra cooling by evaporation. Nor is a complete drenching more likely to be injurious than wetting of one part. But never sit still wet ; and in changing rub the body dry. There is a general tendency, springing from fatigue, indolence, or indifference, to neglect damp feet ; that is to say, to dry them by the fire ; but this process is tedious and uncertain. I would say especially, off with the muddy boots and sodden socks at once ; dry stockings and slippers, after a hunt, may make just the difference of your being able to go out again or never. Take care never to check perspiration ; during this process, the body is in a somewhat critical condition, and sudden arrest of the function may result disastrously, even fatally. One part of the business of perspiration is to equalise bodily 'temperature, and it must not be interfered with. The secret of much that might be said about hathing when heated lies here. A person overheated, panting it may be, with throbbing temples, and a dry skin, is in danger partly because the natural cooling by evaporation from the skin is denied, and this condition is sometimes not far from a sunstroke. Under these circumstances, a person of fairly good constitution may plunge into the water with impunity, even with benefit. But if the body be already cooling by sweating, rapid abstraction of heat from the surface may cause internal congestion, never unattended with danger. Drinking ice -water SEC. IV HYGIENE OF COLLECTORSHIP 31 offers a somewhat parallel case ; even on stooping to drink at the brook, when flushed Avith heat, it is well to bathe the face and hands first, and to taste the water before a full draught. It is a well-known excellent rule, not to bathe immediately after a full meal ; because during digestion the organs concerned are compara- tively engorged, and any sudden disturbance of the circulation may be disastrous. The imperative necessity of resisting drowsiness under extreme cold requires no comment. In Avalking under a hot sun, the head may Ijc sensibly protected by green leaves or grass in the hat ; they may be advantageously moistened, but not enough to drip about the ears. Under such circumstances the slightest giddiness, dimness of sight, or confusion of ideas, should be taken as a warning of possible sunstroke, instantly demanding rest and shelter. Hunger and Fatigue are more closely related than they might seem to be ; one is a sign that the fuel is out, and the other asks for it. Extreme fatigue, indeed, destroys appetite ; this simply^ means, temporary incapacity for digestion. But even far short of this, food is more easily digested and better relished after a little preparation of the furnace. On coming home tired, it is much better to make a leisurely and reasonably nice toilet than to eat at once, or to sit still thinking how tired you are ; after a change and a wash you will feel like a " new man," and go to table in capital state. Whatever dietetic irregularities a high state of civilisation may demand or render practicable, a normally healthy person is inconvenienced almost as soon as his regular meal-time passes with- out food ; a few can work comfortably or ])rofitably fasting over six or eight hours. Eat before starting ; if for a day's tramp, take a lunch ; the most frugal meal -will ajDjiease if it do not satisfy hunger, and so postpone its urgency. As a small scrap of practical wisdom, I would add, keep the remnants of the lunch, if there are any ; for you cannot always be sure of getting in to supper. Stimulation. — When cold, fatigued, depressed in mind, and on other occasions, you may feel inclined to resort to artificial stimulus. Kespecting this many-sided theme I have a few words to offer of direct bearing on the collector's case. It should be clearly under- stood in the first place that a stimulant confers no strength what- ever ; it simply calls the powers that be into increased action at their own expense. Seeking real strength in stimulus is as wise as an attempt to lift yourself up by the boot-straps. You may gather yourself to leap the ditch and you clear it ; but no such muscular energy can be sustained ; exhaustion speedily renders further ex- penditure impossible. But now suppose a very j^owerful mental impression be made, say the circumstance of a succession of ditches in front, and a mad dog behind ; if the stimulus of terror be suffi- 32 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY tart i ciently strong, you may leap on till you drop senseless. Alcoholic stimulus is a parallel case, and is not seldom pushed to the same extreme. Under its influence you never can tell when you are tired ; the expenditure goes on, indeed, with unnatural rapidity, only it is not felt at the time ; but the upshot is you have all the original fatigue to endure and to recover from, 'plus the fatigue resulting from over-excitation of the system. Taken as a fortification against cold, alcohol is as unsatisfactory as a remedy for fatigue. Insensibility to cold does not imply protection. The fact is the exposure is greater than before ; the circulation and respiration being hurried, the waste is greater, and as sound fuel cannot be immediately supplied, the temperature of the body is soon lowered. The transient warmth and glow over, the system has both cold and depression to endure ; there is no use in borrowing from yourself and fancying you are richer. Secondly, the value of any stimulus (except in a few exigencies of disease or injury) is in proportion, not to the intensity, but to the equableness and duraljility of its effect. This is one reason why tea, coffee, and articles of corre- sponding qualities are preferable to alcoholic drinks ; they work so smoothly that their effect is often unnoticed, and they " stay by " well ; the friction of alcohol is tremendous in comparison. A glass of grog may help a veteran over the fence, but no one, young or old, can shoot all day on liquor. I have had so much experience in the use of tobacco as a mild stimulant that I am probably no impartial judge of its merits : I will simply say I do not use it in the field, because it indisposes to muscular activity, and favours reflection when observation is required ; and because temporary abstinence provokes the morbid appetite and renders the weed more grateful afterwards. Thirdly, undue excitation of any physical function is followed by corresponding depression, on the simple principle that action and reaction are equal ; and the balance of health turns too easily to be wilfully disturbed. Stimulation is a draft upon vital capital, when interest alone should sufiice ; it may be needed at times to bridge a chasm, but habitual living beyond vital income infallibly entails bankruptcy in health. The use of alcohol in health seems practically restricted to purposes of sensuous gratifica- tion on the part of those prepared to pay a round jirice for this luxury. The three golden rules here are, — never drink before breakfast, never drink alone, and never drink bad liquor ; their observance may make even the abuse of alcohol tolei'able. Serious objections, for a naturalist at least, are that science, viewed through a clrinking-glass, seems distant and uncertain, while the pleasure of drinking is immediate and unquestionable ; and that intemperance, being an attempt to defy certain physical laws, is therefore eminently unscientific. REGISTRATION AND LABELLING 33 § 5.— KEGISTEATIOX AND LABELLING A mere Outline of a Field Naturalist's Duties would be iu- excusabl}- incomplete without mention of these important matters : and, because so much of the business of collecting must be left to be acquired in the school of experience, I am the more anxious to give explicit directions whenever, as in this instance, it is possiljle to do so. Record your Observations Daily. — Li one sense the specimens themselves are your record, — priina facie evidence of your industry and ability ; and if labelled as I shall presently advise, they tell no small part of the whole story. But this is not enough ; indeed, I am not sure that an ably conducted ornithological journal is not the better half of your operations. Under your editorship of labelling, specimens tell what they know about themselves ; but you can tell much more yourself. Let us look at a day's work : You have shot and skinned so many birds, and laid them away labelled. You have made observations about them before shooting, and have observed a number of birds that you did not shoot. You have items of haunts and habits, abundance or scarcity; of manners and actions under special circumstances, as of pairing, nesting, laying, rearing young, feeding, migrating, and what not ; various notes of birds are still ringiiig in your ears ; and finally, you may have noted the absence of species you saw a while befoi-e, or had expected to occur in your vicinity. Meteorological and topo- graphical items, especially when travelling, are often of great assist- ance in explaining the occurrences and actions of birds. Now you know these things, but very likel}' no one else does ; and you know them at the time, but you will not recollect a tithe of them in a few Aveeks or months, to say nothing of years. Don't trust your memory; it will trip you up ; Avhat is clear now will grow obscure ; what is found will be lost. Write down everything while it is fresh in your mind ; write it out in full ; time so spent will be time saved in the end, when you offer your researches to the discriminating public. Don't be satisfied with a dry-as-dust item; clothe a skeleton fact, and breathe life into it with thoughts that glow ; let the paper smell of the woods. There's a pulse in a new fact; catch the rhythm before it dies. Keep ofi" the cpiicksands of mere memorandum — that means something " to be remembered," which is just what you cannot do. Shun abbreviations ; such keys rust with disuse, and may fail in after times to unlock the secret that should have been laid bare in the Ijeginning. Use no signs intel- ligible only to yourself ; your note-books may come to be overhauled by others whom you would not wish to disappoint. Be sparing of D 34 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i sentiment, a delicate thing, easily degraded to drivel ; crude enthusi- asm always hacks instead of hewing. Beware of literary infelicities ; " the written word remains," it may be, after you have passed away ; put down nothing for your friend's blush, or your enemy's sneer ; write as if a stranger were looking over your shoulder. Ornithological Book-keeping may be left to your discretion and good taste in the details of execution. Each may consult his preferences for rulings, headings, and blank forms of all sorts, as Avell as particular modes of entry. But my experience has been that the entries it is advisable to make are too multifarious to be accommodated by the most ingenious formal ruling ; unless, indeed, you make the conventional heading " Remarks " disproportionately wide, and commit to it everything not otherwise provided for. My preference is decidedly for a plain page. I use a strongly bound blank book, cap size, containing at least six or eight quires of good smooth paper ; but smaller may be needed for travelling, even down to a pocket note-book. I would not advise a multiplicity of books, splitting up your record into different departments : let it be journal and register of specimens combined. (The registry of your own collecting has nothing to do with the register of your cabinet of birds, which is sure to include a proportion of specimens from other sources, received in exchange, donated, or purchased. I speak of this beyond.) I have found it convenient to commence a day's record Avith a register of the specimens secured, each entry consisting of a duplicate of the bird's label (see beyond), accompanied by any further remarks I have to make respecting the particular specimens ; then to go on with the full of my day's observations, as suggested in the last paragraph. You thus have a register of collections in chronological order, told off Avith an unbroken series of numbers, checked Avith the routine label -items, and continually interspersed Avith the balance of your ornithological studies. Since your private field-number is sometimes an indispensable clew to the authentication of a specimen after it has left your own hands, never duplicate it. If you are collecting other objects of natural history besides birds, still have but one series of numbers ; duly enter your mammal, or mineral, or Avhatever it is, in its place, Avith the number under Avhich it happens to fall. Be scrupulously accurate Avith these and all other figures, as of dates and measurements. Ahvays use black ink ; lead-pencilling is never safe. Labelling. — This should never be neglected. It is enough to make a sensitive ornithologist shiA^er to see a specimen A\athout that indispensable appendage — a label. I am sorry to observe that the routine labelling of most collections is far from being satisfactory. A Avell-appointed label is something more than a slip of paper Avith the bird's name on it, and is still defective if, as is too often the REGISTRATION AND LABELLING 35 case, only the locality and collector are added. A complete label records the following particulars : 1 . Title, of the survej^ voyage, exploration, or other expedition (if any), during which the specimen was collected. 2. Name of the person in charge of the same (and it may be remarked that the less he really cares about birds, and the less he actually interests himself to procure them, the more particular he will be about this). 3. TilU of the institution or association (if any) under the auspices or patronage of which the specimen was procured, or for which it is designed. 4. Name of collector ; partly to give credit where it is due, but principally to fix responsibility, and authenticate the rest of the items. f). Collector's number, referring to his note-book, as just explained; if the specimen afterwards forms part of a general collection it usually acquires another number by new registry ; the collector's then becoming the "original," as distinguished from the "current," number. 6. Locality, perhaps the most important of all the items. A specimen of unknown or even uncertain origin is worthless or nearly so. Lamentable confusion has only too often arisen in ornithological writings from vague or erroneous indications of locality. I should say that a specimen not authentic in this particular had better have its supposed origin erased. Nor Avill it do to say simply, for instance, "North America" or "England." The general geographical distribution of birds being according to recognised faunal areas, ornithologists generally know already the quarter of the globe from which any bird comes ; the locality of particular specimens, therefore, should be fixed down to the very spot. If this be obscure, add the name of the nearest place to be found on a fairly good map, giving distance and direction. 7. Date of collection, — day of the month, and year. Among other reasons for this may be mentioned the fact that it is often important to know what season a particular plumage indicates. 8. Sex, and if possible also affe, of the specimen, — an item that bespeaks its own import- ance. Ornithologists of all countries are agreed upon certain signs to indicate the sex. These are : ^J for nude, 5 for female, — the symbols respectively of Mars and Venus. Immaturity is often denoted by the sign ^ ; thus, ^ ^, young male. Or, we may write ? ad., ? ?j(j., for adult female, young female, respectively. It is preferable, however, to use the language of science, not our vernacular, and say ^ juv. [juvenis, young). Nupt. signifies breed- ing plumage ; homof. means a bird of the year. 9. Measure- ments of length, and of extent of wings ; the former can only be obtained approximately, and the latter not at all, from a prepared specimen. 10. Colour of the eyes, and of the bill, feet, or other naked or soft jjarts, the tints of which may change in drying. 11. Miscellaneous particulars, such as contents of stomach, special 36 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY circumstances of capture, vernacular name, etc. 12. Scientific name of the bird. This is really the least important item of all, though generally thought to take precedence. But a bird labels itself, so to speak ; and nature's label may be deciphered at any time. In fact, I would enjoin upon the collector not to write out the supposed name of the bird in the field, unless the species is so well known as to be absolutely unquestionable. Proper identification, in any case to Avhich the slightest doubt may attach, can only be made after critical study in the closet with ample facilities for examination and comparison. But it is always well to note on the label the local vernacular name ; for native names, especially un-English ones, may become valuable items of information. The first eight items above, and tlie twelfth, usually constitute the face or obverse of a label ; the rest are commonly written on the back or reverse side. Labels should be of light cardboard, or very stiff writing j)aper; they may be dressed attractively, as fancy suggests ; the general items of a large number of specimens are best printed ; the special ones must of course be written. Shape is immaterial. A slip about three inches long and two-thirds of an inch wide will do very well for anything, from a haAvk to a hummine;-bird. Something like the shipping-tag used by It seems The slip merchants is excellent, particularly for larger objects most natural to attach the string to the left-hand end should be tied so as to swing just clear of the bird's legs, but not loose enough to dangle several inches, for in that case the labels are continually tangling with each other when the birds are laid away in drawers. The following forms show the face and back of the last label I happened to write before these lines were originally penned; they represent the size and shape that I find most convenient for general purposes ; while the legend illustrates every one of the twelve items above specified. 5 '3 o m Explorations in Dakota. Dr. Elliott Cones, U.S.A. No. 2C55. Buteo borealis (Gni.) V. ? juv. 5" Fort Randall, Missouri River. Oct. 29, 1S72. Obverse. 23.00x53.00x17.50. — Eyes yellowish -gray ; bill liorn-blue, darker at tip ; cere ^vax - yellow ; tarsi dull yellowish ; claws bluish - black. Stomach contained portions of a rabbit; also, a large tapeworm. Ec verse. SEC, V REGISTRATION AND LABELLING 37 Direetions for Measurement may be inserted here, as this matter pertains rightfully to the recording of specimens. The following instructions apply not only to length and extent, but to the principal other dimensions, which may be taken at any time. For large birds, a tape-line showing inches and fourths will do ; for smaller ones, a foot-rule graduated for inches and eighths, or better, decimals to hundredths, must be used ; and for all nice measurements the dividers are indispensable. Length : Distance between the tip of the bill and end of the longest tail-feather. Lay the bird on its back on the ruler on a table ; take hold of the bill with one hand and of both legs with the other ; pull with reasonable force to get the curve all out of the neck ; hold the bird thus with the tip of the bill flush with one end of the ruler, and see where the end of the tail points. Put the tape-line in place of the ruler, in the same way, for larger birds. Extent : Distance between the tips of the outspread wings. They must be fully outstretched, with the bird on its back, crosswise on the ruler, its bill pointing to your breast. Take hold of right and left metacarpus with the thumb and forefinger of your left and right hand respectively, stretch with reasonable force, getting one wing-tip flush with one end of the ruler, and see how far the other wing -tip reaches. With large birds pull as hard as you please, and use the table, floor, or side of the room ; mark the points and apply tape-line. Length of wing : Distance from the carpal angle formed at the bend of the wing to the end of the longest primary. Take it with compasses for small birds. In birds with a convex wing, do not lay the tape-line over the curve, but under the wing in a straight line. This measure- ment is the one called, for short, "the wing." Length of tail: Distance from the roots of the rectrices to the end of the longest one. Feel for the pope's-nose ; in either a fresh or dried specimen there is more or less of a palpable lump into which the tail-feathers stick. Guess as near as you can to the middle of this lump ; place the end of the ruler opposite this point, and see where the tip of the longest tail-feather comes. Length of hill: Some take the curve of the upper mandilile ; others the side of the upper mandible from the feathers ; others the gape, etc. I take the chord of the cidmen. Place one foot of the dividers on the culmen just where the feathers end ; no matter whether the culmen runs up on the forehead, or the frontal feathers run out on the culmen, and no matter whether the culmen is straight or curved. Then with me the length of the hill is the shortest distance from the point just indicated to the tip of the upper mandible : measure it Avith the dividers. In a straight bill of course it is the length of the culmen itself; in a curved bill, however, it is quite another thing. Length of tarsus: Distance between the joint of the tarsus with the leg above, and 38 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i that with the first plialanx of tlie middle toe below. Measure it always with dividers, and in front of the leg. Length of toes : Distance in a straight line along the upper surface of a toe from the point last indicated to the root of the claw on top. Length of toe is to be taken without the claw, unless otherwise specified. Length of the clatvs : Distance in a straight line from the point last indicated to the tip of the claw. Length of head is often a convenient dimension for comparison with the bill. Set one foot of the dividers over the Ixase of the culmen (determined as above) and allow the other to slip snugly down over the arch of the occiput. § 6.— INSTRUMENTS, MATERIALS, AND FIXTURES FOR PREPARING BIRDSKINS Instruments. — The only indispensable instrument is a pair of scissors or a knife ; pr-actically, j'ou want both of these, a pair of spring-forceps, and a knitting-needle, or some similar wooden or ivory object. I have made hundreds of birdskins consecutively without touching another tool. Persicos odi, ])uer, apjyaratus ! I always mistrust the emphasis of a collector who makes a flourish of instruments. You might be surprised to see what a meagre, shabby- looking kit our best taxidermists work with. Stick to your scissors, knife, forceps, and needle. P>ut you may as well buy, at the outset, a common dissecting-case, such as medical students begin business with ; it is very cheap, and if there are some unnecessary things in it, it makes a nice little box in which to keep your tools. The case contains, among other things, several scalpels, just the knives you want ; a " cartilage-knife," which is nothing but a stout scalpel, suit- able for large birds ; the best kind of scissors for your purpose, with short blades and long handles — if kneed at the hinge so much the better ; spring foi'ceps, the very thing ; a blow-pipe, useful in many ways and answering instead of a knitting-needle ; and some little steel hooks, chained together, which you may want to use. But you will also require, for large birds, a very heavy pair of scissors, or small shears, short-bladed and long-handled, and a stout pair of bone nippers. Have some pins and needles ; surgical needles, which cut instead of punching, are the best. Get a hone or strop, if you wish, and a feather-duster. Use of scissors requires no comment, and I would urge their habitual employ instead of the knife-blade ; I do nine-tenths of my cutting with scissors, and find it much the easiest. A double-lever is twice as effective as a single one. More- , over, scalpels need constant sharpening ; mine are generally too dull SEC. VI INSTI<:UI\/ENTS, ETC., FOR PREPARING BIRDSKFNS 39 to cut much with, and I suppose I am like other people — while scissors stay sharp enough. The flat, thin ivory or ebony handle of the scalpel is about as useful as the blade. Finger-nails, which were made before scalpels, are a mighty help. Forceps are almost indis- pensable for seizing and holding parts too small or too remote to be gi'asped by the fingers. The knitting-needle is wanted for a specific purjjose noted beyond. The shears or nippers are only needed for what the ordinary scissors are too weak to do. Materials. — (re) For stuffing. "What do you stuff 'em with?" is usually the first question of idle curiosity about taxidermy, as if that were the great point ; whereas the stuffing is so small a matter that one might reply, " Anything, except brickbats ! " But if stuffing l)irds were the final cause of rotton, that admirable substance could not be more perfectly adapted than it is to the purpose. Ordinary raw cotton-batting or wadding is what you want. When I can get it I never think of using anything else for small birds. I would use it for all birds were expense no object. Here tow comes in ; there is a fine, clean, bleached article of tow prepared for surgical dressings ; this is the best, Ixit any will do. Some say chop your tow fine ; this is harmless, but unnecessary, A crumpled newspaper, wrapped with tow, is first-rate' for a large bird. Failing cotton Or tow, any soft, light, dry, vegetable substance may be made to answer, — rags, paper, crumbled leaves, fine dried grass, soft fibrous inner bark, etc. ; the down of certain plants, as thistle and silkweed, makes an exquisite filling for small birds. But I will qualify my remark about brick- bats by saying : Never put hair, wool, feathers, or any other animal substance in a binlskin ; far better leave it empty : for, as we shall see in the sequel, bugs come fast enough, without being invited into a snug nest. (6) Far j^t'^serving. Arsenic, — not the pure metal properly so called, but arsenic of the shops, or arsenious acid, — is the great preservative. Use diy powdered arsenic, plenty of it, and nothing else. There is no substitute for arsenic worth)' of the name, and no preparation of arsenic so good as the simple substance. Various kinds of " arsenical soap " were and may still be in vogue ; it is a nasty, greasy substance ; and although efficacious enough, there is a very serious hygienic objection to its use.^ Arsenic, I need not say, is a violent irritant poison, and must therefore be duly guarded, but may be used with perfect impunity. It is a very heavy substance, not appreciably volatile at ordinary temperatures, and therefore not ^ " Strauge as it may appear to some, I would say avoid especially all the so-called arsenical soaps ; they are at best but filthy preparations ; besides, it is a fact to which I can bear painful testimony that tliey are, especially wlien applied to a greasy skin, poisonous in the extreme. I have been so badly poisoned, while working njion the skins of some fat water birds that had been prepared with arsenical soap, as to be made seriously ill, the poison having worked into the system through some small wounds or scratches on my baud. Had pure arsenic been used in preparing the skins, 40 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i liable, as some suppose, to be breathed, to any perceptible, much less injurious, extent. It will not at once enter the pores of healthy unbroken skin ; so it is no matter if it gets on the fingers. The exceedingly minute quantity that may be supposed to find its way into the system in the course of time is believed by many competent physicians to be rather beneficial as a tonic. I will not commit myself to this ; for, though I have never felt better than when working daily with arsenic, I do not know how much my health was improved by the outdoor exercise always taken at the same time. The simple precautions are, not to let it lie too long in con- tact with the skin, nor get into an abrasion, nor under the nails. It will convert a scratch or cut into a festering sore of some little severity ; while if lodged under the nails it soon shows itself by soreness, increased by pressure ; a white speck appears, then a tiny abscess forms, discharges, and gets well in a few days. Your pre- cautions really respect other persons more than yourself; the receptacle should be conspicuously labelled " POISON ! " Arsenic is a good friend ; besides preserving our birds, it keeps busybodies and meddlesome folks away from the scene of operations, by raising a wholesome suspicion of the taxidermist's surroundings. It may be kept in the tin pots in which it is usually sold ; but some shallowex', broader receptacle is more convenient. A little drawer say 6x6 inches, and an inch deep, to slip under the edge of the table, or a similar compartment in a large drawer, will be found handy. A salt-spoon, or little wooden shovel whittled like one, is nice to use it ■\vath, though it is in fact generally taken up with the handle of the scalpel. As stated, there is no substitute for arsenic ; but at a pinch you can make temporary shift with the following, among other articles : table salt, or saltpetre, or charcoal strewn plentifully ; strong solution of corrosive sublimate, brushed over the skin inside ; creosote ; imjjure carbolic acid — these last two are c|uite efiicacious, but they smell horribly for an indefinite period. A bird threatening to decompose before you are ready to skin it, may be saved for a while by injecting weak carbolic acid or creosote doAvn the throat and up the fundament ; or by disembowelling, and filling the cavity with powdered charcoal, (c) For cleansing. Gijpsum is an almost indispensable material for cleansing soiled plumage. Gypsum is properly native hydrated sulphate of lime ; the article referred to is " plaster of Paris " or gypsum heated up to 260° F. (by which the water of crystallisation is driven off) and then finely pulverised. the effect would not have been as had, although gi-ease and arseuic are generally a blood-poison in soine degree ; but when combined with ' soajj ' the effect, at least as far as my experience goes, is much more injurious" (Maynard, Guide, p. 12). In indorsing this, I would add that the combination is the more poisonous, in all prob- ability, sim2)ly becaiise the soajj, being detersive, mechanically facilitates the entrance of the poison, without, however, chemically increasing its virulence. SEC. VI INSTRUMENTS, ETC., FOR PREPARING BIRDS A'INS 41 When mixed witli water it soon solidifies, the original hydrate being again formed. The mode of using it is indicated beyond. It is most conveniently kept in a shallow tray, say a foot square, and an inch or two deep, which had better, furthermore, slide under the table as a drawer ; or form a compartment of a larger drawer. Keep gijpsum and arsenic in different-looldn;/ receptacles, not so much to keep from poisoning yourself, as to keep from not poisoning a birdskin. They look much alike, and skinning becomes such a mechanical process that you may get hold of the wrong article when your thoughts are wandering in the woods. Gypsum, like arsenic, has no worthy rival in its own field ; some substitutes, in the order of their applicability, are : corn-meal, probably the best thing after gypsum ; calcined magnesia (very good but too light — it floats in the air, and makes you cough) ; bicarbonate of magnesia ; powdered chalk (" prepared chalk," crefapraparata of the drug shops, is the best kind) ; fine wood-ashes ; clean dry loam. No article, however powdery when dry, that contains a glutinous principle, as for instance gum-arabic or flour, is admissible. ((/) For wrapping, you want a thin, pliable, strong paj^er ; toilet-paper is the very best ; newspaper is pretty good. For making the cones or cylinders in which bird- skins may be set to dry, a stiff'er article is required ; writing paper answers perfectly. Naturalists habitually carry a Pocket Lens, much as other people do a watch. You will find a magnifying glass very con- venient in your search for the sexual organs of small birds when obscure, as they frequently are, out of the breeding-season ; in picking lice from plumage, to send to your entomological friend, who will very likely pronounce them to be of a new species ; and for other jiurposes. Fixtures. — When travelling, your fixtures must ordinarily be limited to a collecting-chest ; you will have to skin birds on the top of this, on the tail-board of a wagon, or on your lap, as the case may be. The chest should be very substantial — iron-bound is best ; strong as to hinges and lock — and have handles. A good size is 30 X 18 X 18 inches. Let it be fitted with a set of trays; the bottom one say four inches deep ; the rest shallower ; the top one very shallow, and divided into compartments for your tools and materials, unless you fix these on the under side of the lid. Start out Avith all the trays full of cotton or tow. At home have a room to yourself, if possible ; taxidermy makes a mess to which your wife may object, and arsenic must not come in the way of children. At any rate have your own table. Great cleanliness is indispensable, especially when doing much work in hot weather, for the place soon smells sour if neglected. I use no special receptacle for offal, for this only makes another article to be cleaned ; lay down a piece of 42 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY paper for the refuse, and throw the whole away. A perfectly smooth surface is desirable. I generally have a large pane of window-glass on the table before me. It will reall}' l)e found advantageous to have a scale of inches scratched on the edge of the table ; only a small part of it need be fractionally subdivided ; this replaces the foot-rule and tape-line, just as the tacks of a dry-goods counter answer for the yard-stick. You will find it worth while to rig some sort of a derrick arrangement, which j^ou can readily devise, on one end of the table, to hitch your hook to, if you hang your birds up to skin them ; they should swing clear of everything. The table should have a large general drawer, with a little drawer for gypsum and arsenic, unless these be kept elsewhere. Stuffing may be kept in a box under the table, and make a nice footstool ; or in a bag slung to the table lea;. § 7.— HOW TO MAKE A BIRDSKIN (rt) The Regular Process Lay the Bird on its Back, the bill pointing to your right ^ elbow. Take the scalpel like a pen, with edge of blade uppermost, and run a straight furroAv through the feathers along the middle line of the belly, from end of the breast -bone to the vent. Part the feathers completely, and keep them parted.- Observe a strip of skin either perfectly naked, or only covered with short down ; this is the line for incision. Take scissors, stick in the pointed blade just over the end of the breast-bone, cut in a straight line thence to and into the vent ; cut extremely shallow.^ Take the forceps in your left hand, and scalpel in 3'our right, both held pen-wise, and with the forceps seize and lift up one of the edges of the cut skin, gently pressing away the belly-walls with ^ Reverse this and following directions for position, if you are left-handed. " Tlie motion is exactly like stroking the right and left sides of a moustache apart ; you would never dress the hairs smoothly away from the middle line, by poking from ends to root ; nor will the feathers stay aside, unless stroked away from base to tip. ^ The skin over the belly is thin as tissue paper in a small bird ; the chances are you will at first cut the walls of the belly too, oiieniug the cavity ; this is no great matter, for a pledget of cotton will keep the bowels in ; nevertheless, try to divide skin only. Reason for cutting into vent : this orifice makes a nice natural termina- tion of the incision, buttonhole-wise, and may keep tlie end of the cut from tearing around the root of the tail. Reason for beginning to cut over the edge of the breast- bone : the musciilar walls of the belly are very thiu, and stick so close to the skin that you may be in danger of attempting to remove them with the skin, instead of removing the skin from them ; wliereas you cannot remove anything but skin from over the breast-bone, so you have a guide at the start. You can tell skin from belly- wall, by its livid, transluceut whitishness instead of redness. SEC. VII HO IV TO MAKE A BIRDSKIN 43 the scalijel-point ; no cutting is required ; the skin may be peeled off without trouble. Skin away till you meet an obstacle ; it is the thigh. Lay down the instruments ; Avith your left hand take hold of the leg outside at the shank ; put your right forefinger under the raised flap of skin, and feel a bump ; it is the knee; push up the leg till this bump comes into view ; hold it so. Take the scissors in your right hand ; tuck one blade under the concavity of the knee, and sever the joint at a stroke ; then the thigh is left with the rest of the body, while the rest of the leg is dissevered and hangs only by skin. Push the leg farther up till it has slipped out of its sheath of skin, like a finger out of a glove, down to the heel-joint. You have now to clear off the flesh and leave the bone there ; you may scrape till this is done, but there is a better way. Stick the closed points of the scissors in among the muscles just below the head of the bone, then separate the blades just wide enough to grasj) the bone ; snip off its head ; draw the head to one side ; all the muscles follow, being there attached ; strip them downward from the bone ; the bone is left naked, with the muscle hanging by a bundle of tendons ("leaders") at its foot ; sever these tendons collectively at a stroke. This whole performance will occupy about three seconds, after practice ; and you may soon discover you can nick off the head of the bone of a small bird Avith the thumb-nail. DraAv the leg-bone back into its sheath, and leave it. Repeat the foregoing steps on the other side of the bird. If you are bothered by the skin-flaps settling against the belly-walls, insert a fluft' of cotton. Keep the feathers out of the Avound ; cotton and the moustache movement Avill do it. Next you must sever the tail from the body, leaving a small " pope's-nose " for the feathers to stay stuck into. Put the bird in the holloAv of your lightly closed left hand, tail upAvard, belly toAvard you ; or, if too large for this, stand it on its breast on the table in similar position. ThroAv your left forefinger across the front (under side) of the tail, pressing a little backAvard ; take the scissors, cut the end of the lower bowel free first, then peck aAvay at bone and muscle with cautious snips, till the tail-stump is dissevered from the rump, and the tail hangs only by skin. You will soon learn to do it all at one stroke ; but you cannot be too careful at first ; you are cutting right down on to the skin over the top of the pope's-nose, and if you divide this, the bird Avill part company Avith its tail altogether. Noav you have the rump-stump protruding naked ; the legs dangling on either side ; the tail hanging loose doAvn over the bird's back. Lay doAvn scissors, take up forceps ^ in your left hand ; Avith them seize and 1 Or at this stage you may instead stick a hook into a firm part of the rump, and haug up the bird about the level of your breast ; you thus have both bauds free to work with. This is advisable with all birds too large to be readily taken in 44 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i hold the stump of the rump ; and with point or handle of scalpel in the other hand, with finger-tips, or with thumb-nail (best), gently press down on and peel away skin.^ No cutting will be required (usually) till you come to the wings : the skin peels oft' (usually) as easily as an orange-rind ; as fast as it is loosened, evert it ; that is, make it continually turn itself more and more completely inside out. Work thus till you are stopped by the obtruding wings.^ You have to sever the wing from the body at the shoulder, just as you did the leg at the knee, and leave it hanging by skin alone. Take your scissors,^ as soon as the upper arm is exposed, and cut through flesh and bone alike at one stroke, a little below (outside of) the shoulder-joint. Do the same with the other wing. As soon as the wings are severed the body has been skinned to the root of the neck ; the process becomes very easy ; the neck almost slips out of its sheath of itself ; and if you have properly attended to keeping the feathers out of the wound and to continual eversion of the skin, you now find you have a naked body connected dumb- bell-wise by a naked neck to a cap of reversed skin into which the head has disappeared, from the inside of which the legs and wings dangle, and around the edges of which is a row of plumage and a tail.* Here comes up an important consideration : the skin, plumage, legs, wings, and tail together weigh something, — enough to stretch ^ unduly the skin of the neck, from the small cylinder of hand, and will help you, at first, with any bird. But there is really no use of it with a small bird, and you may as well learn the best way of working at first as afterward. ^ The idea of the whole movement is exactly like ungloviug your hand from the wrist, by turning the glove inside out to the very finger tips. Some say, pull off the skin ; I say nccer inill a bird's skin under any circumstances : xmsh it off, always operating at lines of contact of skin with body, never upon areas of skin already detached. - The elbows will get in your way before you reach the point of attack, namely, the shoulder, unless the wings were completely relaxed (as was essential, indeed, if you measured alar expanse coiTectly). Think what a difference it would make, were you skinning a man through a slit in the belly, whether his arms were stretched above his head or pinned against his ribs. It is just the same with a bird. When properly relaxed the wings are readily pressed away toward the bird's head, so that the shoulders are encountered before the elbows. ^ Shears will be required to crash through a large arm-bone. Or, you may with the scalpel unjoiut the shoulder. The joint will be found higher up) and deeper among the breast muscles than you might sujipose, unless you are used to carving fowls at table. With a small bird, you may snap the bone with the thumb-nail and tear asunder the muscles in an instant. * You find that the little straight cut you made along the belly has somehow become a hole larger than the greatest girth of the bird ; be undismayed ; it is all right. " If you have up to this point properly puslxed off the skin instead of puUijig it, there is as yet probably no stretching of any consequence ; but, in skinning the head, which comes next, it is almost impossible for a beginner to avoid stretching to an extent involving great damage to the good looks of a skin. Try your utmost, by delicacy of manipulation at the lines of contact of skin with flesh, and only there, to I/O IV ro MAKE A BIRDS KIN 45 which they are now suspended ; the whole mass must be supported. For small birds, gather it in the hollow of your left hand, letting the body swing over the back of your hand out of the way ; for large ones, rest the affair on the table or your lap. To skin the head, secure the body in the position just indicated, by confining the neck between 3'our left thumb and forefinger ; bring the riglit finaers and thumb to a cone over the head, and draw it out with gentle force ; or, holding the head itself between the left thumb and forefinger, insert the handle of the scalpel between the skin and skull, and pry a little, to enlarge the neck-cylinder of skin enough to let the head pass. It will generally ^ slip out of its hood very readily, as far as its greatest diameter ; - there it sticks, Ijeing in fact pinned by the ears. Still holding tlie bird as before, with the point of the scalpel handled like a nut-picker, or with your thumb- nail, detach the delicate membrane that lines the ear-opening ; do the same for the other ear. The skull is then shelled out to the eyes, and will skin no farther of its own accord, being again attached by a membrane, around the border of the eye-socket. Holding the scalpel as before, run its edge around an arc (a semi- circle is enough to let you into the orbit) of the circumference, dissevering the membrane from the bone. Reverse the scalj^el, and scoop out the eyeball with the end of the handle ; you bring out the eye betwixt the ball of your thumb and the handle of the instrument, tearing apart the optic nerve and the conjunctival tissue, but taking care not to open the eyeball ^ or lacerate the eyelids. Do the same with the other eye. The head is then skinned far enough ; there is no use of getting quite to the base of the bill. You have now to get rid of the brain and flesh of the nape and jaws,'^ and leave most of the skull in ; the cranial dome makes the only perfect " stufiing " for the skin of the head. This is all done at once by only four particular cuts. Hold the head prevent lengthwise stretching. Crosswise distension is of no consequence ; in fact mors or less of it is usually required to skin the head, and it tends to counteract the ill effect of undue elongation. ^ The special case of head too large for the calibre of the neck is treated beyond. - And you will at once find a great ajii^arent increase of amount of free skin in your hand, owing to release and extension of all that was before shortened in length by circular distension, in enlargement of the neck-cylinder. ^ An eyeball is much larger than it looks from the outside ; if you stick the instrument straight into the socket, you may punch a hole in the ball and let out the water — a very disagreeable complication. Insinuate the knife-handle close to the rim of the socket, and hug the wall of the cavity throughout. •* You may of course at this stage cut oil" the neck at the najDe, pimch a hole in the base of the skull, dig out the brains, and scrape away at the jaw-muscles till you are satisfied or tired ; an unnecessary job, during which the skin may have become dry and shrivelled and hard to turn right side out. The operation described in the text may require five seconds, perhaps. 46 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY parti between your left thumb and fingers, the bill pointing towards yon, the bird's palate facing you ; you observe a space bounded behind by the base of the skull where the neck joins, in front by the floor of the mouth, on either side by the prongs of the under jaw, — these last especially prominent. Take the scissors ; stick one blade just inside one branch of the lower jaw, thence into the eye-socket Avhich lies below (the head being upside down), thence into the brain-box; make a cut parallel with the jaw, just inside of it, bringing the upper scissor-blade perpendicularly downward, crash- ing through the skull just inside of the angle of the jaw. Duplicate this cut on the other side. Connect the anterior ends of these cuts by a transverse one across the floor and roof of the mouth. Connect the posterior ends of the side cuts by one across the back of the skull near its base, — ^just where the nape-muscle ceases to override the cranium. You have enclosed and cut out a squarish-shaped mass of bone and muscle, and, on gently pulling the neck (to which of course it remains attached) the whole affair comes out, bringing the brain with it, but leaving the entire roof of the skull supported on a scaftbld- ing of jaw-bone. It only remains to skin the wings. Seize the arm- stump with fingers or forceps ; the upper arm is readily drawn from its sheath as far as the elbow ; but the wing must be skinned to the wrist (carpus — " bend of the wing ") ; yet it will not come out easily, because the secondary quills grow to one of the forearm bones (the ulna), pinning down the skin the whole way along a series of points. To break up these connections, hold the upper arm firmly with the left thumb and forefinger, the convexity of the elbow looking towards you; press the right thumb-nail closely against the back edge of the ulna, and strip downward, scraping the bone with the nail the whole way. If you only hit the line of adhesions, there is no trouble at all about this. Now you want to leave in one of the two forearm bones, to preserve sufficiently the shape of the limb, but to remove the other, with the upper-arm bone and all the flesh. It is done in a moment : stick the point of the scissors between the heads of the two forearm bones, and cut the hinder one (ulna) away from the elbow ; then the other fore- arm bone (radius), bearing on its near end the elbow and the whole upper-arm, is to be stripped away from the ulna, taking with it the flesh of the forearm, and to be cut off" at its far end close to the wrist-joint, one stroke severing the bone and all the tendons that pass over the wrist to the hand ; then the ulna, bare of flesh, is alone left in, attached at the wrist. Draw gently on the wing from the outside till it slips into the natural position whence you everted it. Do the same for the other wing. This finishes the skinning process. The skin is now to be turned right side out. Begin any way you please, till you see the point of the bill reappearing among 47 SEC. VII IIOIV TO MAKE A BIRDSKIN the feathers ; seize it with fingers or forceps, as convenient, and use it for gentle traction. But by no means pull it out by holding- on to the rear end of the skin — that would infallibly stretch the skin. Holding the bill, make a cylinder of your left hand and coax the skin backward with a sort of milking motion. It will come easily enough, until the final stage of getting the head back into its skull- cap ; this may require some little dexterity ; but you cannot fail to get the head in, if you remember what you did to get it out. When this is fairly accom})lished, you for the first time have the pleasure of seeing something that looks like a birdskin. Your next care is to apply arsenic. Lay the skin on its back, the opening toward you and wide spread, so the interior is in view. Eun the scalpel- handle into the neck to dilate that cylinder until you can see the skull ; find your way to the orifices of the legs and wings ; expose the 2)ope's-nose ; thus you have not only the general skin surface but all the points where some traces of flesh were left, fairly in view. Put in arsenic ; send some down the neck, making sure it reaches and plentifully besprinkles the whole skull ; drop a little in each wing-hole and leg-hole ; leave a small pile at the root of the tail ; strew some more over the skin at large. The simple rule is put in as much arsenic as will stick anywhere. Then close the opening, and shake up the skin ; move the head about by the bill • rustle the wings and move the legs ; this distributes the poison thoroughly. If you have got in more than is necessary, as you may judge by seeing it piled up dry, anywhere, hold the skin with the opening downward over the poison-drawer, and give it a flip and let the superfluous powder fall out. Now for the "make-uj)," upon which the beauty of the preparation depends. First get the emj^ty skin into good shape. Let it lie on its back ; draw it straight out to its natural length. See that the skin of the head fits snugly \ that the eyes, ears, and jaws are in place. Expand the wings to make sure that the bone is in place, and fold them so that the quills override each other naturally ; set the tail-feathers shino-le- wise also ; draw down the legs and leave them straddling wide apart. Give the plumage a preliminary dressing ; if the skin is free from kinks and creases, the feathers come naturally into place ; particular ones that may be awry should be set right, as may be generally done by stroking, or by lifting them free repeatedl}-, and letting them fall \ if any (through carelessness) remain turned into the ojjening, they should be carefully picked out. Remove all traces of gypsum or arsenic with the feather-duster. The stuffing is to be put in through the opening in the belly ; the art is to get in just enough, in the right places. It would never do to push in pellets of cotton, as you would stuff a pillow-case, till the skin is filled up ; no subsequent skill in setting could remove the distortion that 48 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY ' part i would result.^ It takes just jour pieces of stuffing — one for each eye, one for the neck, and one for the body ; while it requires rather less than half as much stuffing as an inexperienced person mio-ht suppose. Take a shred of cotton that will make a tight ball as large as the bird's eye ; stick it on the end of your knitting- needle, and by twirling the needle whilst the cotton is confined in your finger tips, you make a neat ball. Introduce this through the belly-opening into the eye-socket; if you have cut away skull enough, as already directed, it Avill go right in; disengage the needle with a reverse twirl, and withdraw it. Take hold of the bill with one hand, and with the forceps in the other, dress the eye- lids neatly and naturally over the elastic substance within. Repeat for the other eye. Take next a shred of cotton that will roll into a firm cylinder rather less than the size of the bird's neck. Roll it on the needle much as you did the eyeball, introduce it in the same way, and ram it firmly into the base of the skull ; disengage the needle by twirling it the other way, and withdraw it, taking care not to dislodge the cotton neck. If now you peep into the skin you will see the end of this artificial neck ; push it up against the skin of the breast, — it must not lie down on the back between the shoulders.^ The body-wad comes next, to imitate the size and shape of the bird's trunk. Take a mass of cotton you think will be enough, and take about half of this ; that will be plenty (cotton is very elastic). It should make a tolerably firm ball, rather egg- shaped, swelling at the breast, smaller behind. If you simply squeeze up the cotton, it will not stay compressed ; it requires a motion something like that which bakers employ to knead dough into the shape of a loaf. Keep tucking over the borders of the cotton till the desired shape and firmness are attained. Insert the ^ For any ordinary bird up to the size of a crow, it is often directed that the leo--bones and wing-bones be wrapped with cotton or tow. I should not think of putting anything around the wing-bones of any bird up to the size of an eagle, swan, or pelican. Examination of a skinned wing will show how extremely compact it is, except just at the shoulder. What you remove will never make any difference from the outside, while you would almost inevitably get in too much, not of the right shape, and make an awkward bulging no art would remedy ; I say, then, leave the wino-s' of all but the largest birds empty, and put in very little cotton under any cir- cunistances. As for legs, the whole host of small perching birds need no wrapping whatever ; depend upon it you will make a nicer skin without wrapping. But large birds and' those with very muscular or otherwise prominent legs must have the removal of flesh compensated. I treat of these cases beyond. - Although a bird's neck is really, of course, in direct continuation of the back- bone, yet the natural sigmoid curve of the neck is such that it virtually takes depart- ure rather from the breast, its lower curve being received between the prongs of the merrythought. Tliis is what we must imitate instead of the true anatomy. If you let the end of the neck lie between the shoulders, it will infallibly press them apart, so that the interscapular plumage cannot shingle over the scapular feathers as it should, and a gaping place, showing down or even naked skin, will result. Likewise, if the neck be made too large (the chances are that way at first), the same result follows. These seemingly trifling points are very important. HOW TO MAKE A BIRDSKIX 49 ball between the blades of the forceps in such way that the instru- ment confines the folded-over edges, and with a wriggling motion insinuate it aright into the body. Before relaxing the forceiis, jiut your thumb and forefinger in the bird's armpits, and pinch the shoulders together till they almost touch ; this is to make sure that there is no stuffing between the shoulders, — the whole mass lying breastwards. Loosen the forceps and withdraw them. If the ball is rightly made and tucked in, the elasticity of the cotton will chiefly expend itself in puffing out the breast, which is just Avhat is wanted. Be careful not to push the body too far in ; if it impacts against the skin of the neck, this will infallibly stretch, driving the shoulders apart, and no art will remedy the unsightlj^ gap resulting. You see I dwell on this matter of the shoulders ; the whole knack of stuffing correctly focuses just over the shoulders. If you find you have made the body too large, pull it out and make a smaller one ; if it fits nicely about the shoulders, but is too long to go in, or too puffy over the belly, let it stay, and pick away shreds at the open end till the redundancy is remedied. Your bird is now stuffed. Close the opening by bringing the edges of the original cut together. There is no use of sewing up the cut for a small bird ; if the stuflang is correct, the feathers Avill hide the opening ; and if they do not, it is no matter. You are not making an object for a show- case, but for a naturalist's cabinet. Supposing you to have been so far successful, little remains to be done ; the skin already looks very much like a dead bird ; you have only to give the finishing touches, and " set " it. Fixing the Avings nicely is a great point. Fold each wing closely ; see that the carpal bend is well defined, that the coverts show their several oblique rows perfectly, that all the quills override each other like shingles. Tuck the folded wings close up to the body — rather on the l>ird's bade than along its sides ; see that the wing tips meet over the tail (under the tail as the bird lies on its back) ; let the carpal angle nestle in the plumage ; have the shoulders close together, so that the interscapular feathers shingle over the scapulars. If the wing be pressed in too tightl}^, the scapulars will rise up on end ; there must be neither furrow nor ridge about the insertion of the wings ; everything must lie perfecth^ smooth. At this stage of the process lift u}) the skin gingerly, and let it slip head first through one hand after the other, pressing here or there to correct a deformity, or uniformly to make the whole skin compact. The wings set, next bring the legs together, so that the bones Avithin the skin lie parallel with each other ; bend the heel -joint a little, to let the tarsi cross each other about their middle ; lay them sidewise on the tail, so that the naturally flexed toes lie flat, all the claws facing each other. See that the neck is perfectly straight, and, if anything, shortened rather than out- E 50 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i stretched ; have the crown of the head flat on the table, the bill pointing straight forward/ the mandibles shut tightly.- Never attempt any fancy attitudes with a birdskin ; the simpler and more compactly it is made up the better.^ Finally, I say, hang over your bird (if you have time) ; dress better the feathers that were well dressed before ; perfect every curve ; finish caressingly, and put it away tenderly, as you hope to be shriven yourself when the time comes. There are several Avays of laying a birdskin. A common, easy, and slovenly way is to thrust it head first into a paper cone ; but it makes a hollow-chested, pot-bellied object, unpleasant to see, and renders your nice work on the make-up futile. A paper cylinder, corresponding in calibre to the greatest girth of the birdskin, binds the wings well, and makes a good specimen. Eemarking that there are some detestable practices, such as hanging up a bird by a string through the nose (methods only to be mentioned to be condemned), I will tell you the easiest and best way by Avhich the most elegant and tasteful results are secured. The skins are simply laid away in cotton, just as they come from your hands. Take a considerable wad of cotton, make a bed of it, lay the specimen in, and tuck it up nicely around the edges. I generally take a thin sheet of cotton wadding, the sizing of which confers some textile consist- ency, and wrap the bird completely but lightly in it. By loosening or tightening a trifle here or there, laying down a pillow or other special slight pressure, the most delicate contour-lines may be preserved with fidelity. Unnecessary pother is sometimes made about drying skins ; the fact being that under ordinary circumstances they could not be kept from drying perfectly ; and they dry in 1 Exceptions. Woodpeckers, clucks, aud some other birds treated of beyond, are best set with the head flat on one side, the bill pointing obliquely to the right or left ; owls, with the bill pointing straight \ip in the air as the bird lies on its back. - If the mandibles gape, run a thread through the nostrils and tie it tightly under the bill. Or, since this injures the nostrils (and we frequently want to examine their structure), stick a pin in under the bill close to the gonys, driving it obliquely into the j)alate. Sometimes the skin of the throat looks sunken betwixt the sides of the jaw. A shred of cotton introduced with forceps through the mouth will obviate this. ■^ Don't cock up the head, trying to impart a knowing air — it cannot be done, and only makes the poor bird look ridiculous. Don't lay the skin on one side, with the legs in perching jjosition, and don't spread the wings — tlie bird will never perch nor fly again, and the suggestion is not in keeping. The only permissible departure from the rule of severe simplicity is when some special ornament, as a fine crest, may be naturally displayed, or some hidden markings be brought out, or a shape of tail or wing to be perpetuated; but in all such cases the "spread-eagle" style should be sparingly indulged. It is, however, frequently desirable to give some special set to hide a defect, as loss of plumage, etc. ; this may often be accomplished very cun- ningly, with excellent result. No rules for this can be laid down, since the details vary in every case ; but in general the weak spot may be hidden iiy contracting the skin of the place, and then setting the bird in an attitude that naturally corresponds, thus making a virtue of necessity. HOW TO MAKE A BIRDS KIN 51 exactly the shape they are set, if not accidentally pressed upon. At sea, however, or during unusually protracted wet weather, they of course dry slowly, and may require some attention to prevent mildew or souring, especially in the cases of very large, thick- skinned, or greasy specimens. Thorough poisoning, and drying by a fire, or placing in the sun, will always answer. Very close packing retards drying. When travelling, or operating under other circum- stances requiring economy of space, you must not expect to turn out your collection in elegant order. Perfection of contour-lines can only be secured by putting each specimen away by itself; undue pressure is always liable to produce unhappily oatrc configura- tion of a skin. Trays in a packing box are of great service in limiting possibilities of pressure ; they should be shallow ; one four inches deep will take a well -stuffed hen -hawk, for example, or accommodate from three to six sparrows atop of one another. It is well to sort out j^our specimens somewhat according to size, to keep heavy ones off little ones ; though the chinks around the former may usually be economised with advantage by packing in the less valuable or the less neatly prepared of the latter. When limited to a travelling chest, I generally pass in the skins as fast as made, l^acking them solid in one sense, yet finding a nice resting-place for each. If each rests in its own cotton coffin, it is astonishing how close they may be laid without harm, and how many will go in a given space ; a tray 30 x 18 x 4 inches will easily hold three hundred and fifty birds six inches long. As a tray fills up, the drier ones first put in may be submitted to more pressure. A skin originally dried in good shape may subsequently be pressed perfectly flat without material injury ; the only thing to avoid being distor- tion. The whole knack of jiacking birds corresponds to that of filling a trunk solidly full of clothes, as may easily be done without damage to an immaculate shirt-front. Finallj^, I would say, never put away a bird unlabelled, not even for an hour ; you may forget it or die. Never tie a label to a bird's bill, wing, or tail ; tie it securely to legs where they cross, and it will be just half as liable to become detached as if tied to one leg only. Never paste a label, or even a number, on a bird's plumage. Never put in glass eyes before mounting. Never paint or varnish a bird's bill or feet. Never replace missing plumage of one Ijird with the feathers of another — no, not even if the birds came out of the same nest.^ ^ [In presenting anew, and to an English public, the foregoing directions for inani- jiulation, the author may be jiardoued if lie alludes to the test of time in their favour. Some of his earliest specimens, made in 1857, are extant, and in good order still. Many of the large cabinets, both in Europe and the United States, include some of his preparations, received in exchange through the Smithsonian Institution, or through private channels. They will be found, as a rule, compact yet shapely, with a smooth finish, and very durable. He may add, lest this paragraph should be misunderstood, 52 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY (h) Special Processes ; Complications and Accidents The Foregoing Method of procedure is a routine practice applicable to the " general run " of birds. But there are several cases requiring a modification of this process ; while several circum- stances may tend to embarrass operations. The principal special conditions may therefore be separately treated to advantage. Size. — Other things being equal, a large bird is more dijSicult to prepare than a small one. In one case, you only need a certain delicacy of touch, easily acquired and soon becoming mechanical ] in the other, demand on your strength may be made, till your muscles ache. It takes longer, too ; ^ I could put away a dozen sparrows in the time I should sj)end over an eagle ; and I would rather undertake a hundred humming-birds than one ostrich. For large birds, say anything from a hen-hawk upward, various special manipulations I have directed may be forgone, while however you observe their general drift and intent. You may open the bird as directed, or, turning it tail to you, cut with a knife." Forceps are rarely required ; there is not much that is too small to be taken in hand. As soon as the tail is divided, hang up the Ijird by the that he has seldom purchased a birdskiu, never sold one in his life, and for some years has owned none. Excejating a few given to friends, his ornithological specimens, as well as those in other departments of natural history, have always been presented to the United States Government, and deposited in the national collection at Washington. 9tli September 1S89.] 1 The reader may be curious to know something of the statistics on this score — how long it ought to take him to prei)are an ordinary skin. He can scarcely imagine, from his first tedious operations, how expert he may become, not only in beauty of resiilt, but in rapidity of execution. I have seen taxidermists make good small skins at the rate of ten an hour ; but this is extraordinary. The quickest work I ever did myself was eight an hour, or an average of seven and a half minutes apiece, and fairly good skins. But I picked my birds, all small ones, well shot, labelled, measured, and plugged beforehand, so that the rate of work was exceptional, besides including only the actual manipulations from first cut to laying away. No one averages eight birds an hour, even excluding the necessary preliminaries of cleansing, plugging, etc. Four birds an hour, everything included, is good work. A very eminent ornithologist of America, and an expert taxidermist, once laid a whimsical wager that he would skin and stuff a l^rd before a certain friend of his could pick all the feathers off a specimen of the same kind. I forget the time, but he won, and his friend ate crow, literally, that night. " Certain among larger birds are often opened elsewhere than along the belly, with what advantage I cannot say from my own experience. Various water-bii'ds, such as loons, greljes, auks, gulls, and ducks (in fact any swimming-bird with dense under plumage), may be opened along the side by a cut under the wings from the shoulder over the hip to the rump ; the cut is comjiletely hidden by the make-ujJ, and the plumage is never ruffied. But I see no necessity for this ; for, as a rule, the belly-opening can be coniiiletely effaced with due care, though a very greasy bird with white under plumage generally stains where opened, in spite of every j^recaution. Such birds as loons, grebes, cormorants, and« i:)enguins are often opened by a cut across the fundament from one leg to the other ; their conformation in fact suggests and favours this operation. I have often seen water-birds slit down the back ; but I consider it poor practice. SEC. vii HOJV TO MAKE A B/A'BS A7.V 53 rump, so you will have both hands free. Let it swing clear of the wall or table, at any height most convenient. The steel hooks of a dissecting case are not always large enough ; use a stout fish-hook with the barb filed off. Work with your nails, assisted by the scalpel if necessary. I know of no l)ird, and I think there is none, in England at least, the skin of which is so intimately adherent by fibrous or muscular tissue as to require actual dissecting throughout; a gannet comes, perhaps, as near this as any ; but in many cases the knife may be constantly employed with advantage. Use it with long clean sweeping strokes, hugging the skin rather than the body. The knee and shoulder commonly require disarticulation, unless you use bone-nippers or strong shears. To make the four cuts of the skull may need a very able-bodied instrument, even a chisel. The wings will give the most trouble, and they require a special process ; for you cannot readily break up the adhesions of the secondary quills to the ulna, nor is it desirable that very large feathers should be deprived of this natural support. Hammer or nip oft' the great head of the upper-arm bone, just below the insertion of the breast-muscles ; clean the rest of that bone and leave it in. Tie a string around it (what sailors call " two half-hitches " gives a secure hold on the bony cylinder), and tie it to the other humerus, inside the skin, so that the two bones shall be rather less than their natural distance apart. After the skin is brought right side out, attack the wings thus : Spread the wing under side uppermost, and secure it on the table by driving a tack or brad through the wrist- joint ; this fixes the far end, while the weight of the skin steadies the other. Eaise a whole layer of the under wing-coverts, and make a cut in the skin thus exposed, from elbow to wrist, in the middle line between the two fore-arm bones. Raise the flaps of skin and all the muscle is laid bare ; it is to be removed. This is best done by lifting each muscle from its bed separately, slipping the handle of the scalpel under the individual muscles ; there is little if any bony attachment except at each end, and this is readily severed. Strew in arsenic ; a little cotton may be used to fill the bed of muscle removed from a very large bird ; bring the flaps of skin together, and smooth down the coverts ; you need not sew up the cut, for the coverts will hide the opening ; in fact, the operation does not show at all after the make-up. Stuffing of large birds is not commonly done with only the four pieces already directed. The eyeballs, and usually the neck-cylinder, go in as before ; the body may be filled any way you please, provided you do not put in too much stufiing nor get any between the shoulders. Large birds had better have the leg-bones wrapped to nearly natural size. Observe that the leg -muscles do not form a cylinder, but a cone ; let the wrapping taper naturally from top to bottom. Attention to this 54 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i point is necessary for all large or medium-sized birds with naturally prominent legs. The stout finely feathered legs of a hawk, for example, ought to be well displayed ; with these birds, and also with rails, etc., moreover, imitate the bulge of the thigh with a special wad laid inside the skin. Large birds commonly require also a special wad introduced by the mouth, to make the swell of the throat ; this wad should be rather flufty than firm. As a rule, do not fill out large birds to their natural dimensions ; they take up too much room. Let the head, neck, and legs be accurately prepared, but leave the main cavity one-third if not one-half empty; no more stuffing is required than will fairly smooth out creases in the skin. Reduce bulk rather by flattening out than by general compression. Use tow instead of cotton ; and if at all short of tow, economise with papei^, hay, etc., at least for the deeper portions of the main stufling. Large birds may be set in a great quantity of tow ; wrapped in paper, much like any other parcel ; or simply left to dry on the table, the wings being only supported by cushioning or other suitable means. Shape. — Some special configurations have been noticed in the last paragi'aph, prematurely perhaps, but leading directly up to further considerations respecting shape of certain birds as a modify- ing element in the process of preparation. As for skinning, there is one extremely important matter. Most ducks, many wood- peckers, flamingoes, and some others, cannot be skinned in the usual way, because the head is too large for the calibre of the neck and cannot be drawn through. In such cases, skin as usual to the base of the skull, cut oft' the head there (inside the skin of course), and operate upon it, after turning the skin right side out, as follows : Part the feathers carefully in a straight line down the back of the skull, make a cut through the skin, just long enough to permit the head to pass, draw out the skull through this opening, and dress it as already directed. Return it, draw the edges of the cut nicely together, and sew up the opening with a great many fine stitches. Simple as it may appear, this process is often embar- rassing, for the cut has an unhappy tendency to wander about the neck, enlarging itself even under the most careful manipulation ; Svhile the feathers of the parts are usually so short that it is difli- cult to efface all traces of the operation. I consider it very dis- agreeable ; but for ducks I know of no alternative. I have, however, found out a way to avoid it with woodjieckers, excepting the very largest ; it is this : Before skinning, part the eyelids, and plunge the scalpel right into the eyeball ; seize the cut edge of the ball with the forceps, and pull the eye right out. It may be dexterously done without spilling the eye-water on the plumage ; but, for fear of this, previously put a little gypsum on the spot. Throw ai'senic into the HO IV TO MAKE A BIRDS KIN socket, and then fill it with cotton poked in between the lids. The eyes are thus disposed of. Tlien, in skinning, when you come to the head, dissever it from the neck and work the skull as far out as you can ; it may be sufficiently exposed, in all cases, for you to gouge out the base of the skull with the scissors, and get at the brain to remove it. Apply an extra large dose of arsenic, and you will never hear from what jaw-muscle has been left in. In all these cases, as already remarked, the head is preferably set lyin" on one side, with the bill pointing obliquely to the right or left. Certain birds require a special mode of setting ; these are, birds with very long legs or neck, or both, as swans, geese, pelicans, cormo- rants, snakebirds, loons, and especially cranes, herons, ibises, and flamingoes. Long legs should be doubled conq^letely on themselves ])y bending at the heel-joint, and either tucked under the wings or laid on the under surface ; the chief point is to see that the toes lie flat, so that the claws do not stick up, to catch in things or get broken off. A long neck should be carefully folded ; not at a sharp angle with a crease in the skin, but with a short curve, and brought round either to the side of the bird or on its breast, as may seem most convenient. The object is to make a bale of the skin as nearly as may be, and when it is properly effected it is surprising what little space a crane, for instance, occupies. But it is rarely, if ever, admissible to bend a tail back on the body, however incon- veniently long it may be. Special dilations of skin, like the pouch of a pelican, or the air-sacs of a prairie-hen, may be moderately displayed. Thin Skin. — Loose Plumag-e. — It is astonishing how much resistance is offered by the thin skin of the smallest bird. Though no thicker than tissue paper, it is not very liable to tear if deftly handled ; yet a rent once started often enlarges to an embarrassing extent if the skin be stretched in the least. Accidental rents and enlargements of shot-holes should be neatly sewn up, if occurring in an exposed place ; but in most cases the plumage may be set to hide the openings. The trogons are said to have remarkably thin and delicate skin ; I have never handled one in the flesh. Among British birds, the species of Caprimuhjidce have about the tenderest skins. The obvious indication in all such cases is simply a little extra delicacy of manipulation. In skinning most birds, you should not lose more than a feather or two, excepting those loosened by the shot. Pigeons are peculiar for the very loose insertion of their plumage ; you will have to be particularly careful with them, and in spite of all your precautions a good many feathers will probably drop. As stripping down the secondary quills from the fore-arm, in the manner already indicated, will almost invariably set these feathers free from the skin, I recommend you not to attempt it, but to dress the Avings as prescribed for large birds. 56 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i Fatness. — Fat is a substance abhorred of all dissectors ; always in the way, embarrassing operations and obscuring observations ; while it is seldom worth examination after its structure has once been ascertained. It is particularly obnoxious to the taxidermist, since it is liable to soil the plumage during skinning, and also to soak into the feathers afterwards ; and greasy birdskins are never pleasing objects. A few birds never seem to have any fat ; some, like petrels, are| always oily; at times, especially in the indolent autumn season, Avhen birds have little to do but feed, the great majority acquire an emhonpoint doubtless to their own satisfaction, but to the taxidermist's discomfort. In all such cases gypsum should be lavishly employed. Strew plaster plentifully from the first cut all through the operation ; dip 3'our fingers in it frequently, as well as your instruments. This invaluable absorbent will deal with most of the running fat. When the skin is coinpletely reversed, remove as much of the solid fat as possible ; it is generally found occupying the areolar tissue of particular definite tracts, and most of it may usually be peeled or flaked oft' in considerable masses. Since the soft and oozy state of most birds' fat at ordinary temper- atures may be much improved by cold, it will be well to leave your birds on ice for a while before skinning, if you have the means and time to do so ; the fat will become quite firm. There is a device for preventing or at any rate lessening the soiling of the plumage so apt to occur along the line of incision ; it is invaluable in cases of white plumage. Take a strip of cloth of greater width than the length of the feathers, long enough to go up one side of the cut and down the other. SeAV this closely to the skin all around the cut, and it will form an apron to guard the plumage. You will too frequently find that a bird, prepared without soiling and laid away apparently safe, afterwards grows greasy ; if the plumage is white, it soon becomes worse than ever by showing dust that the grease catches. Perhaps the majority of such birds in our museums show the dirty streak along the belly. The reason is, that the grease has oozed out along the cut, or wherever else the skin has been broken, and infiltrated the plumage, being drawn up apparently by capillary attraction, just as a lampwick sucks up oil. Sometimes, without obviously soiling the plumage, the grease will run along the thread that ties the label, and make a uniformly transparent piece of oil- paper. I have no remedy to offer for this gradual infiltration of the plumage. It will not wash out, even with soap and water. Possibly careful and persistent treatment with ether might be effective, but I am not prepared to say it would be. Eemoval of all fat that can l»e got off during skinning, with a liberal use of plaster, will in a measure prevent a difficulty that remains incurable. Bloodstains, etc. — In the nature of the case, this complication SEC. VII HO IV TO MAKE A BIRDSKIN 57 is of continual occurrence ; fortunately it is easier dealt "with than greasiness. Much may be clone in the field to prevent bloodying of the plumage, as already said. A little Ijlood does not show much on a dark plumage ; but it is of course conspicuous on light or white feathers. Dried blood may often be scraped off, in imitation of the natural process ])y which a bird cleanses its plumage with the bill ; or be pulverised by gently twiddling the feathers between the fingers, and then blown off. But feathers may by due care be washed almost as readily as clothing ; and Ave must ordinarily resort to this to remove all traces of blood, especially from white surfaces. If properly dried they do not show the operation. With a soft rag or pledget of cotton dipped in warm water bathe the place assiduously, pressing down pretty hard, only taking care to stroke the feathers the right "way, so as not to crumple them, until the red colour dis- appears ; then you have simply a wet place to deal with. Press gypsum on the spot ; it Avill cake ; flake it off and apply more, till it will no longer stick. Then raise the feathers on a knife -blade and sprinkle gypsum in among them ; pat it doAvn and shake it up, till the moisture is entirely absorbed. Tavo other fluids of the body Avill give occasional annoyance, — the juices of the alimentary canal and the eye-water. Escape of the former by mouth, nostrils, or vent is preventable by plugging these orifices, and its occurrence is inexcusable. But shot often lacerates the gullet, crop, and boAvels, and though nothing may flow at the time, subsequent jolting or pressure in the game-bag causes the escape of fluids : a seemingly safe specimen may be uuAvrapped to shoAV the Avhole belly-plumage a sodden bi'OAvn mass. Such accidents should be treated precisely like bloodstains ; but it is to be remarked that these stains are not seldom indelible, traces usually persisting, in Avhite plumage at least, in spite of our best endeavours. Eye-Avater, insignificant as it may appear, is often a great annoyance. This liquor is slightly glairy, or rather glassy, and puts a sort of sizing on the plumage difficult to efface ; the more so since the soiling necessarily occurs in a conspicuous place, Avhere the plumage is scanty and delicate. It frequently happens that a lacerated eyeball, by the elasticity of the coats, or adhesion of the lids, retains its fluid till this is pressed out in manipulating the parts ; and, recollecting hoAv the head lies buried in plumage at that stage of the process, it Avill be seen that not only the head, but much of the neck and even the breast, may become AA^etted. If the parts are extensively soaked, the specimen is almost irreparably damaged. Plaster Avill absorb the moisture, but much of the sizing may be retained on the plumage ; therefore, though the place seems simply Avet, it should be thoroughly Avashed Avith Avater before the gypsum is applied. I ahvays endeavour to prevent the accident ; if I notice a lacerated eyeball, I extract it S8 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i before skinning, in the manner described for woodpeckers. JMiscel- laneous stains, from the juices of plants, etc., may be received ; all such are treated on general principles. Blood on the beak and feet of rapacious birds, mud on the bill and legs of waders, etc. etc., may be washed off without the slightest difficulty, A land bird that has fallen in the water should be recovered as soon as possible, picked up by the bill, and shaken ; most of the water will run oft', unless the plumage is completely soaked. It should be allowed to dry just as it is, without touching the plumage, before being wrapjDed and bagged. If a bird fall in soft mud, the dirt should be scraped or snapped off as far as this can be done without plastering the feathers down, and the rest allowed to dry ; it may afterward be rubbed fine and dusted off, Avhen no harm will ensue, except to white feathers, which may require Avashing. Mutilation. — You will often be troubled, early in your practice, with broken legs and wings, and various lacerations ; but the injury must be very severe (such as the carrying away of a limb, or blow- ing off the whole top of a head) that cannot be in great measure remedied by care and skill. Suppose a little bird, shot through the neck or small of the back, comes apart while being skinned ; you have only to remove the hinder portion, be that much or little, and go on with the rest as if it were the whole. If the leg-bone of a small bird be broken near the heel, let it come away altogether ; it will make little if any difterence. In case of the same accident to a large bird that ought to have the legs wrapped, whittle out a peg and stick it in the hollow stump of the bone ; if there is no stump left, file a piece of stout wire to a point and stick it into the heel joint. If the fore-arm bone that you usually leave in a small bird is broken, remove it and leave the other in ; if both are broken, do not clean the wings so thoroughly that they become detached ; an extra pinch of arsenic will condone the omission. In a large bird, if both bones of the fore-arm are broken, splint them with a bit of wood laid in between, so that one end hitches at the elbow, the other at the wrist. A humerus may be replaced like a leg bone, but this is rarely required. If the skull be smashed, save the pieces, and leave them if you can ; if not, imitate the arch of the head with a firm cotton -ball. A broken tarsus is readily splinted with a pin thrust up through the sole of the foot ; if too large for this, use a pointed piece of wire. There is no mending a bill when part of it is shot away ; for I think the replacing of part by putty, stucco, etc., inadmissible ; but if it be only fractured, the pieces may usually be retained in place by winding with thread, or with a touch of glue or mucilage. I have already hinted how art- fully various Aveak places in a skin, due to mutilation or loss of , plumage, may be hidden. SEC. VII HO IV TO MAKE A BIRDS KIN 59 Decomposition. — It might seem unnecessary to speak of what may be smelt so readily as animal putrescence ; but there are some useful points to be learned in this connection, besides the im- portant sanitary precautions that are to be deduced. Immediately after death the various fluids of the body begin to settle (so to speak), and shortly afterward the muscular system becomes fixed in what is technicall}' called rujor mortis. This stiffening usually occurs as the animal heat dies away ; but its onset, and especially its duration, is very variable, according to circumstances, such as cause of death ; although in most cases of sudden violent death of an animal in previous good health, it seems to depend chiefly upon temperature, being transient and imperfect, or altogether wanting, in hot weather. As it passes oft', the whole system relaxes, and the body soon becomes as limp as at the moment of death. This is the period immediately preceding decomposition ; in fact, it may be considered as the stage of incipient putridity ; it is very brief in warm weather, and it should be seized as the last opportunity of preparing a bird without inconvenience and even danger. If not skinned at once, putrescence becomes established ; it is indicated by the effluvium; by the distension of the abdomen with gaseous products of decomposition ; by the loosening of the cuticle, and consequently of the feathers ; and by other signs. If you part the feathers of a bad-smelling bird's belly to find the skin swollen and livid or greenish, while the feathers come off" at a touch, the bird is too far gone to be recovered without trouble and risk that no ordinary specimen warrants. It is a singular fact that this early putrescence is more poisonous than utter rottenness ; as physicians are aware, a post-mortem examination at this stage, or even Ijefore it, involves more risk than their ordinary dissecting-room experience. It seems that both natural and pathological poisons lose their early virulence by resolution into other products of decay. The obvious deduction from this is to skin your birds soon enough. Some say they are best skinned perfectly fresh, but I see no reason for this ; when I have time to choose, I take the period of rigidity as being prefer- able on the whole ; for the fluids have then settled, and the limbs are readily relaxed by manipulation. If you have a large bag to dispose of, and are pressed for time, set them in the coolest place you can find, preferably on ice ; a slight lowering of temperature may make a decided diflerence. Disembowelling, which may be accomplished in a moment, will materially retard decomposition. Injections of creosote or dilute carbolic acid will arrest decay for a time, or for an indefinitely long period if a large quantity of these antiseptics be employed. When it becomes desirable (it can never be necessary) to skin a putrescent bird, great care must be exercised not only to accomplish the operation, but to avoid danger. I must 6o FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i not, however, lead you to exaggerate the risk, and will add that I think it often overrated. I have probably skinned lairds as " gamey " as any one has, and repeatedly, without being conscious of any ill effects. I am sure that no poison, ordinarily generated by decomposition of a body healthy at death, can compare in viru- lence with that commonly resulting after death by many diseases. I also believe that the gaseous products, however offensive to the smell, are innocuous as a rule. The danger practically narrows down to the absorption of fluids through an abraded surface ; the poison is rarely taken in by natural pores of healthy skin, if it remain in contact but a short time. Cuts and scratches may be closed with a film of collodion, or covered with isinglass or court- plaster, or protected by rubber cots on the fingers. The hands should, of course, be washed with particular care immediately after the operation, and the nails scrupulously dressed. Having never been poisoned, I cannot give the symptoms from personal experience ; but I will quote from Mr. Maynard : — " In a few days numerous pimples, which are exceedingly pain- ful, appear upon the skin of the face and other parts of the person, and, upon those parts where there is chafing or rubbing, become large and deep sores. There is a general languor, and, if badly poisoned, complete prostration results ; the slightest scratch becomes a festering sore. Once poisoned in this manner (and I speak from experience), one is never afterward able to skin any animal that has become in the least putrid, without experiencing some of the symptoms above described. Even birds that you handled before with imjiunity you cannot now skin without great care. The best remedy in this case is, as the Hibernian would say, not to get poisoned . . . bathe the parts frequently in cold water ; and, if chafed, sprinkle the parts after bathing wuth wheat flour. These remedies, if persisted in, will effect a cure, if not too bad ; then, medical advice should be procured without delay." My advice would be, to avoid all mechanical irritation of the inflamed parts ; touch the parts that have ulcerated with a stick of lunar caustic ; take a dose of salts ; use syrup of the iodide of iron, or tincture of the chloride of iron, say thirty drops of either, in a wineglass of water, thrice daily ; rest at first, exercise gradually as you can bear it ; and skin no birds till you have completely recovered. How to mount Birds. — As some may not improbably procure this volume with a reasonable expectation of being taught to mount birds, I append the required instructions, although I only profess to treat of the preparation of skins for the cabinet. As a rule, the purposes of science are best subserved by not mounting specimens ; for display, the only end attained, is not required. I would HO IV TO MAKE A BIRDS A'liV 6i strongly advise you not to mount your rarer or otherwise par- ticularly valuable specimens ; select for this purpose nice, jiretty birds of no special scientific value. The principal objections to mounted birds are, that they take up too much room, require special arrangements for keeping and transportation, and cannot be handled for study with impunity. Some might suppose that a mounted bird would give a better idea of its figure and general aspect than a skin ; but this is only true to a limited extent. Faultless mountint^ is an art really difficult, acquired by few ; the average work done in this line shows something of caricature, ludicrous or repulsive, as the case may be. To copy nature faithfully by taxidermy requires not only long and close study, but an artistic sense ; and this last is a rare gift. Unless you have at least the germs of the faculty in your composition, your taxidermal success will be incommensurate with the time and trouble you bestow. My own taxidermal art is of a low order, decidedly not al)Ove average ; although I have mounted a great many birds that would compare very favourably with ordinary museum work, few of them have entirely answered my ideas. A live bird is to me such a beautiful object that the slightest taxidermal flaw in the effort to represent it is painfully offensive : perhaps this makes me place the standard of excellence too high for practical purposes. I like a good honest birdskin that does not pretend to be anything else ; it is far preferable to the ordinary taxidermal abortions of the show-cases. But if, after the warnings that I mean to convey in this paragraph, you still wish to try your hand in the higher department of taxidermy, I will explain the whole process as far as manipulation goes ; the art you must discover in yourself. The operation of skinning is precisely the same as that already given in detail ; then, instead of stuffing the skin as directed above, to lie on its back in a drawer, you have to stuff it so that it will stand up on its feet and look as much like a live bird as possible. To this end a few additional implements and materials are required. These are : {a) annealed wire of various numbers ; it may be iron, copper, or brass, but must be perfectly annealed, so as to retain no elasticity or spring ; {h) several files of different sizes ; (c) some slender straight brad-awls ; {d) cutting pliers ; (e) setting needles, merely" sewing or darning needles stuck in a light wooden handle, for dressing individual feathers ; (/) plenty of pins (the long, slender insect pins used by entomologists are the best) and sewing thread ; {g) an assortment of glass eyes. (The fixtures and decorations are noticed, beyond, as occasion for their use arises.) There are two principal methods of mounting, which may be respectively styled soft stuffing and hard stuffing. In the former, a wire framework, consisting of a single anterior piece passing in the 62 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i middle line of the body up through the neck and out at the top of the head, is immovably joined behind with two pieces, one passing through each leg ; around this naked forked frame soft stuffing is introduced, bit by bit, till the proper contour of the skin is secured. I have seen very pretty work of this kind, particularly on small birds ; but I consider it much more difficult to secure satisfactory results in this way than by hard stuffing, and I shall therefore con- fine attention to the latter. This method is applicable to all birds, is readily practised, facilitates setting of the wings, arranging of the plumage, and giving of any desired attitude. In hard stuffing, you make a firm ball of tow rolled upon a wire of the size and shape of the bird's body and neck together ; you introduce this whole, after- wards running in the leg wires and clinching them immovably in the mass of tow. Having your empty skin in good shape, as already described, cut three pieces of wire of the right ^ size ; one piece somewhat longer than the whole bird, the other pieces two or three times as long as the whole leg of the bird. File one end of each piece to a fine sharp point; try to secure a three -edged cutting point like that of a surgical needle, rather than the smooth punching point of a sewing-needle, as the former perforates more readily. Have these wires perfectly straight. "-^ Bend a small portion of the unfiled end of the longer wire irregularly upon itself, as a convenient nucleus for the ball of tow.^ Take fine clean tow, in loose dossils, and wrap it round and round the wire nucleus, till you make a firm ball, of the size and shape of the bird's body and neck. Study the contour of the skinned body : notice the swelling breast-muscles, the arch of the lower back, the hollow between the forks of the merrythought into which the neck, when naturally curved, sinks. Everything depends upon correct shaping of the artificial body ; if it be misshapen, no art can properly adjust the skin over it. Firm- ness of the tow ball and accurate contour may both be secured by Avrapping the mass with sewing thread, loosening here, tightening there, till the shape is satisfactory. Be particular to secure a smooth surface ; the skin in drying will shrink close to the stuffing, dis- closing its irregularities, if there be any, by the maladjustment of the plumage that will ensue. Observe especially that the neck, though the direct continuation of the backbone, dips at its lower ^ The right size is the smallest that will supiiort the whole weight of the stuffing and skin without bending, when a piece is introduced into each leg. If using too thick wire, you may have trouble in thrusting it through the legs, or may bui'st the tarsal envelojie. - If accidentally kinky, the finer sizes of wire may be readily straightened by drawing strongly u]ion them so as to stretch them a little. Heavier wire must be hammered out straight. ^ Cotton will not do at all ; it is too soft and elastic, and moreover will not allow of the leg wires being thrust into it and there clinched. SEC. VII now TO MAKE A BIRDSKIN 63 end into the hollow of the merrythought, and so virtually he<'ins there instccad of directly between the shoulders. The three mis- takes most likely to be made by a beginner are, getting the body altogether too large, not firm enough, and irregular. When properly made, it will closely resemble the bird's body and neck, with an inch or several inches of sharp -pointed wire protruding from the anterior extremity of the neck of tow. You have now to introduce the whole atiair into the skin. With the birdskin on its back, the tail pointing to your right elbow, and the abdominal opening as wide as possible, hold the tow body in position relative to the skin ; enter the wire, pass it up through the neck, bring the sharp point exactly against the middle of the skull, pierce skull and skin, causing the wire to protrude some distance from the middle of the crown. Then by gentle means insinuate the body, partly pushing it in, partly drawing the skin over it, till it rests in its proper position. This is just like drawing on a tight kid glove, and no more difficult. See that the body is completely encased ; you must be able to close the abdominal aperture entirely. You have next to wire the legs. Enter the shar^D point of one of the leo-- wires already prepared, exactly at the centre of the sole of the foot, thrusting it up inside the tarsal envelope the whole length of the shank, thence across the heel-joint ^ and up along the next bone of the leg, still inside the skin. The point of the wire will then be seen within the skin, and may be seized and drawn a little farther through, and you will have passed a wire entirely out of sight all the way along the leg. The end of the wire is next to be fixed immovably in the tow ball. Thrust it in at the point where the knee, in life, rests against the side of the body.- Bring the point to view, bend it over and reinsert it till it sticks fast. There are no special directions to be given here ; fasten the wire in any way that etfectually prevents wabbling. You may find it convenient to wire both legs before fastening either, and then clinch them by twisting the two ends together. But remember that the leg-wires may be fixed respecting each other, yet permit a see-saw motion of the body upon them. This must not be ; the body and legs must be fixed upon a jointless frame. Having secured the legs, close the abdominal opening nicely, either by sewing or pinning ; you may stick pins in anywhere, as freely as in a pin-cushion ; the feathers 1 There is occasionally clifHciilty in getting the wire across this joint, from the point sticking into the enlarged end of the shin-bone. In such case, take stout pliers and pinch the joint till the bone is smashed to fragments. The wire will then pass and the comminution will not show. If there is any trouble in passing the wire through the tai'sus, bore a hole for it with a brad-awl. - This point is farther forward and more belly-ward than you might suppose. Observe the skinned body again, and see where the lower end of the thigh lies. If you insert the wire too far back, you cannot by any possibility balance the bird naturally on its perch ; it will look in imminent danger of toppling over. 64 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i hide their heads. Stick a pin through the pope's-nose to fix the tail in place. All this while the bird has been lying on its back, the neck stretched straight in continuation of the body, wired stifliy, the legs straddling wide apart, straight and stiff, the wings lying loosely, half-spread. Now bring the legs together, parallel with each other, and make the sharp bend at the heel-joint that will bring the feet naturally under the belly (over it, as the bird lies on its back). Pick up the bird by the wires that project from the soles and set it on its stand, by running the wdres through holes bored the proper distance apart, and then securing the ends by twisting. The temporary stand that you use for this purpose should have a heavy or otherwise firm support, so as not easily to overturn during the subsequent manipulations. At this stage the bird is a sorry-looking object ; but if you have stuffed correctly and wired securely, it will soon improve. Begin by making it stand properly. The common fault here is placing the tarsi too nearly perpendicular. Perching birds, constituting the majority, habitually stand with the tarsi more nearly horizontal than perpendicular, and generally keep the tarsi parallel with each other. Wading and most walking birds stand with the legs more nearly upright and straight. Many swimming birds straddle a little ; others rarely if ever. See that the toes clasp the perch naturally, or are properly spread on the flat surface. Cause the flank feathers to be correctly adjusted over the tibite (and here I will remark that with most birds little, if any, of the tibioe shows in life), the heel-joint barely, if at all, projecting from the general plumage. It is a common fault of stuffing not to draw the legs closely enough to the body. Above all, look out for the centre of gravity ; though you have reall}^ fastened the bird to its perch, you must not let it look as if it would fall off" if the wdres slipped ; it must appear to rest there of its own accord. Next, give the head and neck a preliminary setting, according to the attitude you have determined upon. This will bring the plumage about the shoulders in proper position for the setting of the Avings, to which you may at once attend. If the body be correctly fashioned and the skin of the shoulders duly adjusted over it, the wings will fold into place without the slightest difficulty. All that I have said before about setting the wings in a skin applies here as well ; but in this case they Avill not stay in place, since they fall by their own weight. They must be pinned up. Holding the wing in place, thrust a pin steadily through near the wrist-joint, into the tow body. Some- times another pin is required to support the weight of the primai'ies ; it may be stuck into the flank of the bird, the outer quill feather resting directly upon it. With large birds a sharp pointed wire must replace the pin. When properly set, the wing-tips will fall SEC. VII HO IV TO MAKE A BIRDS KIN 65 together or symmetrically opposite each other, the quills and coverts will be smoothly imbricated, the scapular series of feathers will lie close, and no bare space will show in front of the shoulder. Much depends u])on the final adjustment of the head. The commonest mistake is getting it too far away from the body. In the ordinary attitudes of most birds little neck shows, the head a})pearing nestled upon the shoulders. If the neck appeal's too long, it is not to be contracted by pushing the head directly down upon it, but by making an S curve of the neck. No precise directions can be given for the set of the head, but you may be assured it is a delicate, difficult matter ; the slightest turn of the bill one way or another may alter the whole expression of the bird. You will of course have determined beforehand upon your attitude, upon what you wish the bird to appear to be doing \ then, let your meaning be pointed by the bird's bill. On the general subject of striking an attitude, and giving expression to a stuffed bird, little can be said to good purpose. If you are to become proficient in this art, it will come from your own study of birds in the field, your own good taste and apprecia- tion of bird -life. The manual processes are easily described and practised ; it is easy to grind paint, I suppose, but not so to be an artist. I shall therefore only follow the above account of the general processes with some special practical points. After "at- titudinising " to your satisfaction, or to the best of your ability, the plumage is to be carefully dressed. Feathers awry may be set in place with a light spring forceps, or needles fixed in a handle, one by one if necessary. When no individual feather seems out of place, it often occurs that the general plumage has a loose, slovenly aspect. This is readily corrected by wrapping with fine thread. Stick a pin into the middle of the back, another into the breast, and perhaps others elsewhere. Fasten the end of a spool of sewing- cotton to one of the pins, and carry it to another, winding the thread about among the pins, till the whole surface is covered with an irregular network. Tighten to reduce an undue prominence, loosen over a depression ; but let the wrapping as a whole be light, firm, and even. This procedure, nicely executed, will give a smooth- ness to the plumage not otherwise attainable, and may be made to produce the most exquisite curves, particularly about the head, neck, and breast. The thread should be left on till the bird is perfectly dry ; it may then be unwound or cut off, and the pins withdrawn. When a particular patch of skin is out of place, it may often be pulled into position and pinned there. You need not be afraid of sticking pins in anywhere : they may be buried in the plumage and left there, or withdrawn when the skin is dry. In addition to the main stuffing, a little is often required in particular F 66 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY parti places. As for the legs, they should be filled out in all such cases as I indicated earlier in this section ; small Ijirds require no such stuffing. It is necessary to fill out the eyes so that the lids rest naturally ; it may be done as heretofore directed, or by putting in pledgets of cotton from the outside. A little nice stuffing is gener- ally required about the upper throat. To stuft' a bird with spread wings requires a special process, in most cases. The wings are to be wired, exactly as directed for the legs ; they may then be placed in any shape. But with most small birds, and those with short wings, simple pinning in the half-spread position indicating fluttering will suffice ; it is readily accomplished with a long, slender insect pin. I have already spoken of fixing the tail by pinning or wiring the pope's-nose to the tow body ; it may be thus fixed at any desired elevation or depression. There are two ways of spreading the tail. One is to run a pointed wire through the quills, near their base, where the wire will be hidden by the coverts ; each feather may be set at any required distance from the next by sliding it along this Avire. This method is appli- cable to large birds ; for small ones the tail may be fixed with the desired spread by enclosing it near its base in a split match, or two slips of cardboard, with the ends tied together. This holds the feathers until they dry in position, when it is to be taken off". Crests may be raised, spread, and displayed on similar principles. A small crest, like that of a cardinal or cherry bird, for instance, may be held up till it dries in position by sticking in behind it a pin with a little ball of cotton on its head. It is sometimes neces- sary to make a bird's toes grasp a support l)y tying them down to it till they dry. The toes of waders that do not lie evenly on the surface of the stand may be tacked down with small brads. The bill may be pinned open or shut, as desired, by the method already given. Substitution of an artificial eye for the natural one is essential for the good looks of a specimen. Glass eyes, of all sizes and colours, may be purchased at a moderate cost. The pupil is always black ; the iris varies. You will, of course, secure the proper colour if it is known, but if not, put in a dark brown or black eye. It is well understood that this means nothing ; it is purely conventional. Yellow is probably the next most common colour ; then come red, white, blue, and green, perhaps approximately in this order of frequency. But do not use these striking colours at haphazard : sacrificing truth, perhaps, to looks. Eyes are generally inserted after the specimen is dry. Remove a portion of the cotton from the orbit, and moisten the lids till they are perfectly pliable ; fix the eye in with putty or wet plaster of Paris, making sure that the , lids are naturally adjusted over it. It goes in obliquely, like a SEC. VII HOJV TO MAKE A BIRDSKIN 67 button through a button-hole. Much art may Ije displayed in this little matter, making a Ijird look this way or that, to carry out the general expression. On finishing a specimen, set it away to dry ; the time required varies, of course, with the weather, the size of the bird, its fatness, etc. The more slowly it dries, the better ; there is less risk of the skin shrinking irregularly. You will often find that a specimen set away with smooth plumage and satisfactory curves dries more or less out of shape, perhaps with the feathers raised in places. I know of no remedy ; it may, in a measure, be prevented by scrupu- lous care in making the body smooth and firm, and in securing slow, equable drying. When perfectly dry remove the wrapping, pull out the superfluous pins or wires, nip off' the others so short that the ends are concealed, and insert the eyes. The specimen is then ready to be transferred to its permanent stand. Fixtures for the disj)lay of the object of course vary intermin- ably. We will take the simplest case, of a large collection of mounted birds for public exhibition. In this instance, uniformity and simplicity are desirable. " Spread eagle " styles of mounting, artificial rocks and flowers, etc., are entirely out of place in a collection of any scientific pretensions, or designed for popular instruction. Besides, they take up too much room. Artistic group- ing of an extensive collection is usually out of the question ; and when this is unattainable, half-Avay eff"orts in that direction should be abandoned in favour of severe simplicity. Birds look best on the whole in uniform rows, assorted according to size, as far as a natural classification allows. They are best set on the plainest stands, with circular base and a short cylindrical crossbar on a lightly turned upright. The stands should be painted dead-white, and be no larger than is necessary for secure support ; a neat stiff' paper label may be attached. A small collection of birds, as an ornament to a private residence, off'ers a different case ; here variety of attitude and appropriate imitation of the birds' natural surround- ings are to be secured. A miniature tree, on Avhich a number of birds may be placed, is readily made. Take stout wire, and by bending it, and attaching other pieces, get the framework of the tree of the desired size, shape, and number of perches. Wrap it closely with tow to a proper calibre, remembering that the two forks of a stem must be together only about as large as the stem itself. Gather a basketful of lichens and tree moss ; reduce them to coarse powder by rubbing with the hands ; besmear the Avhole tree with mucilage or thin glue, and sift the lichen powder on it till the tow is completely hidden. This produces a very natural effect, which may be heightened by separately affixing larger scraps of lichen, or little bunches of moss ; artificial leaves and flowers 68 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i may be added at your taste. The groundwork may be similarly prepared with a bit of board, made adhesive and bestrewn with the same substance ; grasses and moss may be added. If a fiat surface is not desired, soak stout pasteboard till it can be moulded in various irregular elevations and depressions ; lay it over the board and decorate it in the same way. Rocks may be thus nicely imitated, with the addition of powdered glass of various colours. Such a lot of birds is generally enclosed in a cylindrical glass case Avith arched top. As it stands on a table to be viewed from different points, it must be presentable on all sides. A niche in parlour or study is often fitted with a wall -case, which, when artistically arranged, has a very pleasing effect. As such cases may be of considerable size, there is opportunity for the display of great taste in grouping. A place is not to be found for a bird, but a bird for the place, — waders and swimmers below on the ground, perchers on projecting rests above. The surroundings may be prepared by the methods just indicated. One point deserves atten- tion here : since the birds are only viewed from the front, they may have a " show-side '' to which everything else may be sacrificed. Birds are represented flying in such cases more readily than under other circumstances, supjjorted on a concealed wire inserted in the back of the case. I have seen some very successful attempts to represent a bird swimming, the duck being let down part way through an oval hole in a plate of thick glass, underneath which were fixed stuffed fishes, shells, and seaweed. It is hardly necessary to add that in all ornamental collections, labels or other scientific machinery must be rigorously suppressed. Transportation of mounted birds offers obvious difficulty. Un- less very small, they are best secured immovably inside a box by screwing the foot of the stands to the bottom and sides, so that they stay in place Avithout touching each other. Or, they may be carefully packed in cotton, Avith or Avithout removal of the stands. Their preservation from accidental injury depends upon the same care that is bestowed upon ordinary fragile ornaments of the parlour. The ravages of insects are to be prevented upon the principles to be hereafter given in treating of the preservation of birdskins. § 8.— MISCELLANEOUS PARTICULARS Determination of Sex. — This is an important matter, which should never be neglected. For although many birds show un- equivocal sexual distinctions of size, shape, and colour, like those of SEC. VIII MISCELLANEOUS PARTICULARS 69 the barnyard cock and hen, for instance, yet the outward character- istics are more frequentl}' obscure, if not altogether inappreciable, on examination of the skin alone. Young birds, moreover, are usually indistinguishable as to sex, although the adults of the same species may be easily recognised. The rule results, that the sexual oi'gans should be examined as the only infallible indices. The essential organs of masculinity are the testldea ; similarly, the ocarics contain the essence of the female nature. However similar the accessory sexual structures may be, the testicles and ovaries are alwaj's distinct. The male organs of birds never leave the cavity of the belly to fill an external bag of skin (scrotum) as they do among mammals ; they remain within the abdomen, and lie in the same position as the ovaries of the female. Both these organs are situated in the belly opposite the " small of the l)ack," bound closely to the spine, resting on the front of the kidneys near their fore end. The testicles are a pair of subspherical or rather ellip- soidal bodies, usually of the same size, shape, and colour, and are commonly of a dull opaque whitish tint. They always lie close together. A remarkable fact connected with them is, that they are not always of the same size in the same bird, being subject to periodical enlargement during the breeding season, and corresponding atrophy at other seasons. Thus the testicles of a house sparrow, no bigger than a pin's head in winter, swell to the size of peas in April. The ovary (for although this organ is paired originally, only one is usually functionally developed in birds) will be recognised as a flattish mass of irregular contour, and usually whitish colour ; when inactive, it simply appears of finely granular structure which may require a hand lens to be made out ; Avhen producing eggs, its appearance is unmistaka]:)le. Both testis and ovary may further be recognised by a thread leading to the end of the lower bowel, — in one case the sjjerm-duct, in the other the oviduct ; the latter is usually much the more conspicuous, as it at times transmits the perfect egg. There is no ditficulty in reaching the site of these organs. Lay the bird on the left side, its belly toward you : cut with the scissors through the belly-walls diagonally from anus to the root of the last rib, or further, snipping across a few of the lower ribs, if these continue far down, as they do in a loon, for instance. Press the whole mass of intestines aside collectively, and you at once see to the small of the back. There you observe the Jddnei/s, — large, lobular, dark reddish masses moulded into the concavity of the sacrum (or back middle bone of the j^elvis) ; and on their surface, toward their fore end, lie testes or ovary, as just described. The only precaution required is, not to mistake for testicles a pair of small bodies capping the kidneys. These are the adrenah or suprarenal capsules, — organs whose function is unknown, but 70 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i with which at any rate we have nothing to do in this connection. They occur in both sexes, and if the testicles are not immediately seen, or the ovary not at once recognised, they might easily be mistaken for testicles. Observe that, instead of lying in front, they cap the kidneys ; that they are usually yellowish instead of opaque whitish ; and that they have not the firm, snaooth, regular sphericity of the testicles. The testes, however, vary more in shape and colour than might be expected, being sometimes rather oblong or linear, and sometimes grayish or livid bluish, or reddish. There is occasionally but one. The sex determined, use the sign $ or ? to designate it, as already explained. Recognition of Age is a matter of ornithological experience requiring in many or most cases great familiarity with birds for its even approximate accomplishment. There are, however, some un- mistakable signs of immaturity, even after a bird has become full- feathered, that persist for at least one season. These are, in the first place, a peculiar soft fluffy feel of the plumage ; the feathers lack a certain smoothness, density, and stiffening which they subse- quently acquire. Secondly, the bill and feet are softer than those of the adults ; the corners of the mouth are puffy and flabby, the edges and point of the bill are dull, and the scales, etc., of the legs are not sharply cut. Thirdly, the flesh itself is tender and pale coloured. These are some of the points common to all birds, and are independent of the special markings that belong to the youth of particular species. Some birds are actually larger for a Avhile after leaving the nest than in after years when the frame seems to shrink somewhat in acquiring the compactness of senility. On the other hand, the various members, especially the bill and feet, are propor- tionally smaller at first. Newly growing quills are usually recog- nised on sight, the barrel being dark coloured and full of liquid, while the vanes are incomplete. In studying, for example, the shape of a Aving or tail, there is always reason to suspect that the natural proportions are not yet presented, unless the quill is dry, colourless, and empty, or only occupied with shrunken white pith. Examination of the Stomach frequently leads to interesting observations, and is always worth while. In the first j^lace, we learn most unquestionably the nature of the bird's food, which is a highly important item in its natural history. Secondly, we often secure valuable specimens in other departments of zoology, particu- larly entomology. Birds consume incalculable numbers of insects, the harder kinds of which, such as beetles, are not seldom found intact in their stomachs ; and a due percentage of these represent rare and curious species. The gizzards of birds of prey, in particular, should always be inspected, in search of the small mammals, etc., they devour ; and even if the creatures are unfit for preservation. SEC. viii MISCELLANEOUS PARTICULARS 71 we at least learn of their occurrence, perhaps unknown before in a particular region. Mollusk-feeding and fish-eating birds yield their share of specimens. The alimentary canal is often the seat of parasites of various kinds, interesting to the helminthologist ; other species are to be found under the skin, in the body of muscle, in the brain, etc. Most birds are also infested with external })arasites of many kinds, so various that almost every leading species has its own sort of louse, tick, etc. Since these creatures are only at home with a live host, they will be found crawling on the surface of the plumage, preparing for departure, as soon as the body cools after death. There is thus much to learn of a bird aside from what the prepared specimen teaches, and moreover apart from regular ana- tomical investigations. Whenever practicable, brief items should be recorded on the label, as already mentioned. Restoration of Poor Skins. — If your cabinet be a general one, comprising specimens from various sources, you will frequently happen to receive skins so badly prepared as to be unjjleasant objects, besides failing to show their specific characters. There is, of course, no supplying of missing parts or plumage ; but if the defect be simply deformity, this may usually be in a measure remedied. The point is simply to relax the skin, and then proceed as if it were freshly removed from the bird ; it is what bird-stuffers constantly do in mounting birds from prepared skins. The relaxa- tion is effected by moisture alone. Remove the stuffing; fill the interior with cotton or tow saturated with water, yet not dripping ; put pads of the same under the wings ; wrap the bill and feet, and set the specimen in a damp, cool place. Small birds soften very readily and completely ; the process may be facilitated by persistent manipulation. This is the usual method, but there is another, more thorough and more effective ; it is exposure to a vapour-bath. The appointments of the kitchen stove furnish all the apparatus required for an extempore steamer ; the regular fixture is a tin vessel much like a Avash- boiler, with closed lid, false bottom, and stopcock at lower edge. On the false bottom is placed a heavy layer of gypsum, completely saturated with water ; the birds are laid on a perforated tray above it ; and a gentle heat is maintained over a stove. The vapour penetrates every part of the skin, and completely relaxes it, without actually wetting the feathers. The time required varies greatly of course ; observation is the best guide. The chief precaution is not to let the thing get too hot. Professor Baird has remarked that crumpled or bent feathers may have much of their original elasticity restored by dipping in hot Avater. Immersion for a few seconds suffices, when the feathers Avill be observed to straighten out. Shaking off superfluous Avater, they may be simply left to dry, or they may be dried Avith plastei'. 72 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i The method is chiefly applicable to the large feathers of the wings and tail. Soiled plumage of dried skins may be treated exactly as in the case of fresh skins. Mummifleation. — As before mentioned, decay may be arrested by injections of carbolic acid and other antiseptics ; if the tissues be sufficiently permeated with these substances, the Ijody Avill keep indefinitely; it dries and hardens, becoming, in short, a mummy. Injection should be done by the mouth and vent, be thorough, and be repeated several times as the fluid dries in. It is an improve- ment on this to disembowel and fill the belly with saturated tOAv or cotton. Due care should be taken not to soil the feathers in any case, nor should the carbolic solution come in contact with the hands, for it is a powerful irritant poison. I mention the process chiefly to condemn it ; I cannot imagine what circumstances would recommend it, while only an extreme emergency could justify it. It is further objectionable because it appears to lend a dingy hue to some plumages, and to dull most of them perceptibly. Birds prepared — rather unprepared — in this way, may be relaxed by the method just described, and then skinned ; but the operation is difticult. Wet Preparations. — By this term is technically understood an object immersed in some preservative fluid. It is highly desirable to obtain more information of birds than their stuffed skins can ever furnish, and their structure cannot be always examined by dissection on the spot. In fact, a certain small proportion of the birds of any extensive collecting may be preferably and very profitably preserved in this way. Specimens in too poor plumage to be worth skinning may be thus utilised ; so may the bodies of skinned birds, which, although necessarily defective, retain all the viscera, and also aff"ord osteological material. Alcohol is the liquid usually employed, and, of all the various articles recommended, seems to answer best on the whole. I have used a very weak solution of chloride of zinc witli excellent results ; it should not be strong enough to show the slightest turbidity. As glass bottles are liable to break when travelling, do not fit corners, and offer practical annoyance about corkage, rectangular metal cans, preferably of copper, with screw- lid opening, are advisable. They are to be set in small, strong, wooden boxes, made to leave a little room for the lid -wrench, muslin bags for doing up separate parcels, parchment for labels, etc. Unoccupied space in the cans should be filled M'ith tow or a similar substance, to prevent the specimens from swashing about. Labelling should be on parchment ; the writing should be perfectly dry before immersion ; India -ink is the best. Skinned bodies should be numbered to correspond with the dried skin from which taken ; other'wise they may not be identifiable. Large birds MISCELLANEOUS PARTICULARS 73 tlirown ill imskinncd should have the belly opened, to let in the alcohol freely. Birds may be skinned, after being in alcohol, by simply diying them ; they often make fair specimens. Watery moisture that may remain after evaporation of the alcohol may be dried with plaster. Osteological and other Preparations (Figs. 1-3). — While complete skeletonising of a bird is a s})ecial art of some difficulty, and one that does not fall within the scope of this treatise, I may mention two bony preparations ver}^ readily made, and capable of rendering ornithology essential service. I refer to the skull, and to the breast- bone with its principal attachments. These parts of the skeleton are, as a rule, so highly characteristic that they afford in most cases invaluable zoological items. To save a skull is of course to sacrifice a skin, to all intents ; but you often have mutilated or Fios. 1, •!. — Views of stenium and pectoral areli of the ptaimigan, Lagopus alius, reduced ; after A. Newton. (1) Lateral view, with the bones upside down ; (2) viewed from below, a, sternum or breast-bone, showing two long slender lateral processes ; 6, ends of sternal ribs ; c, ends of humerus, or upper-arm bone, near the shoulder-joint ; d, scapula, or shoulder-blade ; e, coracoid ; /, merrythought, or furculum (clavicles). decayed specimens that are very profitably utilised in this way. The breast-bone (Figs. 1, 2, a) excepting when mutilated, is always preservable with the skin, and for choice invoices may form its natural accompaniment. You want to remove along with it the coracoids (the stout bones connecting the breast -bone with the shoulders. Figs. 1, 2,e), the merrythought (Figs. 1, 2,/) intervening between these bones, and the shoulder-blades (Figs. 1, 2, d), all without detachment from each other, for these bones collectively constitute the shoulder-girdle, or scapvlar arch. Slice off the large breast muscles close to the bone, and divide their insertions into the wing-bones (c) ; scrape or cut away the muscles that tie the shoulder-blades to the chest ; snip off the ribs (Figs. 1, 2, b) close to the side of the ])reast-bone ; sever a tough membrane usually found between the prongs of the wish-bone ; then, by taking hold of the shoulders (Figs. 1, 2, at c), you can lift out the whole affair, dividing some slight connections underneath the bone and behind it. The 74 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i following points require attention ; the breast-bone often has long slender processes behind and on the sides (the common fowl and the ptarmigan are extreme illustrations of this, as shown in the figures), liable to be cut by mistake for ribs, or to be snapped ; the shoulder- blades usually taper to a point, easily broken off ; the merrythought is sometimes very delicate or defective. When travelling, it is generally not advisable to make perfect preparations of either skull or sternum ; they are best dried with only superfluous flesh removed, and besprinkled with arsenic. The skull, if j^erfectly cleaned, is particularly liable to lose the anvil-shaped, pronged bones that hinge the jaw, and the freely movable pair that push on the palate from behind. Great care should be exercised respecting the identification of these bones, particularly the sternum, which should invariably bear the number of the specimen to which it belongs ; the label should be tied to the coracoid bone. A skull is more likely to be able to speak for itself, and, besides, is not usually accompanied by a skin ; nevertheless, any record tending to facilitate its recognition should l)e duly entered on the register. There are methods of making elegant bony preparations. You may secure very good results by simply boiling the bones, or, what is perhaps better, macerating them in water till the flesh is completely rotted away, and then bleaching them in the sun. A little potassa or soda hastens the process. With breast-bones, if you can stop the process just when the flesh is completely dissolved, but the tougher liga- ments remain, you secure a "natural" preparation, as it is called; if the ligaments go too, the associate parts of a large specimen may be wired together, those of a small one glued. I think it best, with skulls, to clean them entirely of ligament as well as muscle ; for the underneath parts are usually those conveying the most desirable information, and they should not be in the slightest degree obscured. Since in such case the anvil-shaped bones, the palatal cylinders already mentioned, and sometimes other portions come apart, the whole are best kept in a suitable box. I prefer to see a skull Avith the sheath of the beak removed, though in some cases, ^particularly of hard-billed birds, it may profitably be left on. The completed preparations should be fully labelled by writing on the bone, in preference to an accompanying or attached paper slij), which may be lost. Some object to this, as others do to writing on eggs, that it defaces the specimen ; but I confess I see in dry bones no beauty but that of utility. " In many families of birds, as the ducks (A^iatida^, the trachea or windpipe of the male affords valuable means of distinguishing between the diff'erent natural groups, or even species, chiefly by the form of the bony laljyrinth, or bulla ossea, situated at or just above the divarication of the bronchial tubes. A little trouble will enable COLLECTION OF NESTS AND EGGS 75 the collector in all cases to preserve this organ perfectly, as repre- sented in the annexed engraving (Fig. 3). Before proceeding to skin the specimen a narrow-bladed knife should be introduced into its mouth, and by taking hold of the tongue {A) by the fingers or for- ceps, the muscles {B B) by which it is attached to the lower jaw should be severed as far as they can be reached, care being of course taken not to puncture the windpipe (C C) ; and later J? / in the operation of skinning, when dividing the body -from the neck or head, not to cut into or through it. This done, the windpipe can be easily withdrawn entire and separated from the neck, and then the sternal apparatus being removed as before described, its course must be traced to where, after branching off in a fork (/>), the bronchial tubes {E E) join the lungs. At these latter points it is to be cut off. Then rinsing it in cold water, and leaving it to dry partially, it may, while yet pliant, be either wrapped round the sternum, or coiled up and labelled separately" (Professor Alfred Newton). § 9.— COLLECTION OF NESTS AND EGGS Ornitholog'y and Oolog-y are twin studies, or rather one includes the other. A collection of nests and eggs is indispensable for any thorough study of birds ; and many persons find peculiar pleasure in forming one. Some, however, shrink from robbing birds' nests as something particularly cruel — a sentiment springing, no doubt, from the sympathy and deference that the tender office of maternity inspires. But with all proper respect for the humane emotion, it may be said simply, that birds'-nesting is not nearly so cruel as bird- shooting. What I said in a former section, in endeavouring to guide search for birds, applies in substance to hunting for their nests ; the essential difference is, that the latter are of D Fio. 3. — Tracliea or wind- pipe of the male red-breasted merganser, Mergus serrator, about J nat. size, viewed from above (belli nd) ; after Newton. A, tongue ; B B, its attach- ments ; C C, windpipe, dilated in the middle and swelling below into a bony box, D ; E E, bronchial tubes, going to lungs. 76 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY part i course stationary objects, and consequently more liable to be over- looked, other things being equal, than birds themselves. Most birds nest on trees or bushes ; many on the ground and on rocks ; others in hollows. Some build elegant, elaborate structures, endlessly varied in details of form and material ; others make no nest whatever. Egging is chiefly practicable in May and during the summer ; but some species, particularly birds of prey, begin to lay late in winter or early in spring, so there is really a long period for search. Par- ticular nests, of course, like the birds that build them, can only be found through ornithological knowledge ; but general search is usually rewarded with a varied assortment. The best clue to a hidden nest is the action of the parents ; patient watchfulness is commonly successful in tracing the bird's home. As the science of oology has not progressed to the point of determining from the nests and eggs to what bird they lielong, in even a majority of cases, the utmost care in authentication is indispensable. To be worth anything, not to be worse than worthless in fact, an egg must be identified be- yond question ; must be not only unsuspected, but above suspicion. A shade of suspicion is often attached to dealers' eggs ; not neces- sarily implying bad faith or even negligence on the dealer's part, but from the nature of the case. It is often extremely difficult to make an unquestionable determination, as, for instance, when numbers of birds of similar habits are breeding close together ; or even impossible, as in case the parent eludes observation. Sometimes the most acute observer may be mistaken, circumstances appearing to prove a parentage when such is not the fact. It is in general advisable to secure the parent with the eggs : if shot or snared on the nest, the identification is unquestionable. If you do not yourself know the species, it then becomes necessary to secure the specimen, and retain it with the eggs. It is not required to make a perfect preparation ; the head, or better, the head and a wing, will answer the purpose. AVhen egging in downright earnest, a pair of climbing irons, a coil of f inch rope, and a tin collecting box filled with cotton, become indispensable ; these are the only field implements required in addition to those already specified. Preparing" Eggs. — For blowing eggs, a set of special tools is needed. These are egg-drills, — steel implements with a sharp- pointed conical head of rasping surface, and a slender shaft ; several such, of different sizes, are needed ; also, blow- pipes of different sizes, a delicate thin pair of scissors, light spring forceps, some little hooks, and a small syringe. They are inexpensive, and may be had of any dealer in naturalists' supplies (see Figs. 4-7). Eggs, should never be blown in the old way of making a hole at each end ; nor are two holes anywhere usually rcqiiired. Opening should be effected on one side, preferably that showing least conspicuous or COLLECTION OF NESTS AND EGGS 11 characteristic markings. If two are made, they shovild be rather near together ; on the same side at any rate. Bnt one is generally sufficient, as the liuid contents can escape around the blow-pipe. Holding the egg gently but steadily in the fingers,^ apply the point of the drill pei'pendicularly to the surface, unless it be pre- ferred to prick with a needle first. A twirling motion of the instru- ment gradually enlarges the open- ing by filing away the shell, and so bores a smooth-edged circular hole. This should be no larger than is required to insert the blow-pipe loosely, with room for the contents to escape around it. Nor is it always necessary to insert the pipe; a fine stream of water may be easily injected bj^ holdin Fig. 4.— Eg after Newton. ;-dnlls, diflerent sizes, nat. size ; the close to but not Fig. 5. — Instruments for Mowing eggs ; after Newton, n, y, blow- pipes, \ nat. size ; c, wire for cleansing them ; d, syringe, i uat. size (the ring of the handle must be large enough to insert the thumb) ; (, bulbous insufflator, for sucking eggs. instrument the egg, quite touching. The blowing should be contin- uous and equable, rather than for- cible ; a strong puff easily bursts a delicate egg. Be sure that all the contents are re- moved; then rinse the interior thoroughly Avith clean water, either by taking a mouthful and sending it through a blow- pipe, or with the syringe. Blomng eggs is a rather fatiguing process ; ^ The usual metliod of emirtyiug eggs through one small hole is doubtless 78 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY the cheek-muscles soon tire, and the operator becomes "blown" himself before long. The operation had better be done over a basin of water, both to receive the contents, and to catch the egg if it slip from the fingers. The membrane lining the shell Fig. 7. — Hooks for extracting embryos, nat. size ; after New- ton, a, b, c, plain hoolis ; d, bill-hook, having cutting edge along the concavity. Fio. 6. — Scissors, knives, and forceps, J nat. size ; after Newton. should be I'emoved if possible. It may be seized by the edge around the hole, with the forceps, and drawn out, or picked out with a bent pin. But this is scarcely to be accomp- lished in the case of fresh eggs, when the membrane may be simply pared smoothly around the edge of the hole. Eggs that have been incubated of course offer difficulty, in proportion to the size of the embryo. The supposed to be a very modern trick ; but it dates back at least to 1828, when M. Danger proposed "a new method of preparing and preserving eggs for the cabinet," which is practically the one now followed, though he used a three-edged needle to prick the hole, instead of our modern drill, and did not appear to know some of our ways of managing the embryo. I make this reference to his article to call attention to one of the tools he recommends, which I think would prove useful, as being better than the fingers for holding an egg during drilling and blowing. The simple instru- ment will be understood from a glance at the figure given in the Xuttall Bulletin, iii. 1878, p. 191. The oval rings are covered with a light fabric, as mosquito-netting or muslin, and do not touch the egg, which is held lightly but securely in the netting. The cost would be trifling, and danger might be avoided by Danger's method. SEC. IX COLLECTION OF NESTS AND EGGS 79 hole may be drilled, as before, but it must be larger ; and as the drill is apt to split a shell after it has bored beyond a certain size of hole, it is often well to prick, with a fine needle, a circular series of minute holes almost touching, and then remove the enclosed circle of shell. This must be very carefully done, or the needle will indent or crack the shell, which, it must be I'emembered, grows more brittle towards the time of hatching. Well-formed embryos cannot be got bodily through any hole that can be made in an egg ; they must be extracted piecemeal. They may be cut to pieces with the slender scissors introduced through the hole, and the fragments be picked out with the forceps, hooked out, or blown out. No embryo should be forced through a hole too small ; there is every probability that the shell will burst at the critical moment. Addled eggs, the contents of which are thickened or hardened, offer some difficulty, to overcome which persistent syringing and repeated rinsing are required ; or it may be necessary to fill them with water, and set them away for such length of time that the contents dis- solve by maceration ; carbonate of soda is said to hasten the solution ; the process may be repeated as often as may be necessary. In no event must any of the animal contents be suffered to remain in the shell. When emptied and rinsed, eggs should be gently wiped dry, and set hole downward on blotting-paper to drain. ^ Broken eggs may be neatly mended, sometimes with a film of collodion, or a bit of tissue paper and paste, or the edges may be simply stuck together with any adhesive substance. Even when fragmentary a rare egg is worth preserving. Eggs should ordinarily be left empty ; indeed, the only case in which any filling is admissible is that of a defective ^ Reinforcing the Eggshell before Bloiving. — Fig. 8 " shows a piece of paper, a number of which, when gummed on to an egg, one over the other, and left to dry, strengthen the shell in such a manner that the instruments above described can be introduced tlirough the aperture in the middle and worked to the best advantage, and thus a fully formed embryo may be cut up, and the pieces extracted, through a very moderately sized hole , the number of thicknesses required dapends, of course, gi-eatly upon the ^\ /~N size of the egg, the length of time it has been incubated, / \ 1 / ). and the stoutness of the shell and the paper. Five or six / \ y^ is the least number that it is safe to use. Each 2>iece I (''^\ should be left to dry before the next is gummed on. The \ \__J slits in the margin cause them to set pretty smoothly, which will be found very desirable ; the aperture in the middle of each may be cut out first, or the whole series of layers may be drilled through when the hole is made in the egg. For convenience' sake, the papers may be prepared already Fig. S.— Nat. size, gummed, and moistened when put on (in the same way that adhesive postage labels are used). Doubtless, patches of linen or cotton cloth would answer equally well. When the operation is over, a slight application of water (especially if warm) through the syiinge will loosen them so that tliey can be easily removed, and they can be separated from one another, and dried to serve another time. Tlie size represented in the sketch is that suitable for an egg of moder- ate dimension, such as that of a common fowl. The most efl'ectual way of adopting FIELD ORNITHOLOGY specimen to which some slight solidity can be imparted with cotton. It is unnecessary even to close up the hole. It is best, on all accounts, to keep eggs in sets, a set being the natural clutch, or whatever less number was taken from a nest. The most scrupu- lous attention must be paid to accurate, complete, and permanent labelling. So important is this, that the undeniable defacing of a s})ecimen, by writing on it, is no offset to the advantages accruing from such fixity of record. It is practically impossible to attach a label, as is done with a birdskin, and a loose label is always in danger of being lost or displaced. Write on the shell, then, as many items as possible ; if done neatly, on the side in which the hole was bored, at least one good " show side " remains. An egg should always bear the same number as the parent, in the collector's record. In a general collection, where separate ornithological and oological registers are kept, identification of egg with parent is nevertheless readily secured, by making one the numerator the other the denominator of a fraction, to be simply inverted in its respective application. Thus, bird No. 456 and egg No. 123 are identified by making the former A|f , the latter iff. All the eggs of a clutch should have the same number. If the shell be large enough, the name of the species should be written on it ; if too small, it should be accompanied by a label, and may have the name indicated by a number referring to a certain catalogue. According to my " Check List," for example, No. 4 would indicate Turchs ilkicus, the common redwing. The date of collection is a highly desirable item; it may be abbreviated thus: 3/6/82 means 3d June 1882. It is well to have the egg authenticated by the collector's initials at least. Since sets of eggs may be broken up for dis- tribution to other cabinets, yet pei^manent indication of the size of the clutch be Avanted, it is well to have some method. A good one is to write the number of the clutch on each egg composing it, giving each egg of the set, moreover, its individual number. Suj:)- posing, for example, the clutch No. }f f contained five eggs ; one of of them would be ^f ^ /5/1 : the next A|-| /5/2, and so on. But it should be remembered that all such arbitrary memoranda must be systematic, and be accompanied by a key. Eggs may be kept in cabinets of shallow drawers in little pasteboard trays, each hold- ing a set, and containing a paper label on which various items that this method of emptying eggs is by using very many layers of thin imper and plenty of thick gum, but tliis is, of course, the most tedious. Nevertheless, it is quite worth the trouble in the case of really rare specimens, and they will be none the worse for operating upon from the delay of a few days caused by waiting for the gum to dry and harden. The naturalist to whom this method first occurred has found it answer remarkably well in every case in which it has been used, from the egg of an eagle to that of a humming-bird, and among English oologists it has been generally adopted" (A. Newton, in Smithsoiiian Misc. Coll., p. 139, 1860). SEC. IX COLLECTION OF NESTS AND EGGS 8i cannot be traced on the shell are written in full. Such trays should all he of the same depth, — half an inch is a convenient depth for general purposes ; and of assorted sizes, say from one inch by one and one-half inches up to three by six inches ; it is convenient to have the dimensions regularly graduated by a constant fjictor of, say half an inch, so that the little boxes may be set side by side, either lengthwise or crosswise, Av-ithout interference. Eggs may also be kept safely, advantageously, and with attractive effect, in the nests themselves, in which a fluff" of cotton may be placed to steady them. When not too bulky, too loosely constructed, or of material unsuit- able for preservation, nests shoidd always be collected.^ Those that are very closely attached to twigs should not be torn oft'. Nests threatening to come to pieces, or too frail to be handled Avith- out injury, may be secured by sewing through and through Avith 1 " A Plea for tlie Study of Nests," made by Mr. Ernest Ingersoll in his excellent Birds - Nesting, suits me so well that I will transcribe it. " Whether or not it is worth while to collect nests — for there are many persons who never do so — is, it seems to me, only a question of room in the cabinet. As a scientific study there is far more advantage to be obtained from a series of nests than from a series of eggs. The nest is something with which tlie will and energies of the bird are concerned. It expresses the character of the workman ; is to a certain extent an index of its rank among birds, — for in general those of the highest organisation are the best architects, — and give us a glimpse of the bird's mind and power to understand and adapt itself to changed conditions of life. Over the shape and ornamentation of an egg the bird has no control, being no more able to govern the matter than it can tlie growth of its beak. There is as much difterence to me, in the interest inspired, between the nest and the egg of a bird, as between its brain and its skull, — using the word brain to mean the seat of intellect. The nest is . always more or less the result of conscious planning and intelligent work, even though it does follow a hereditary habit in its style ; while the egg is an automatic production varying, if at all, only as the whole organisation of the bird undergoes change. Don't neglect the nests then. In them more than anywhere else lies the key to the mind and thoughts of a bird, — the spirit which inhabits that beautiful frame and bubbles out of that golden mouth. And is it not this inner life, — this human significance in bii'd nature, — this soul of ornitho- logy, that we are all aiming to discover ? Nests are beautiful, too. What can sur- pass the delicacy of the humming-bird's home glued to the surface of a mossy branch or nestling in the warped point of a pendent leaf ; the vireo's silken hammock ; the oriole's gracefully swaying purse ; the blackbird's model basket in the flags ; the snug little caves of the marsh wrens ; the hermitage-huts of the shy wagtails and gi-ound warblers, the stout fortresses of the sociable swallows ! Moreover, there is much that is highly interesting which remains to be learned about nests, and which can only be kno^\^l by paying close attention to these artistic masterpieces of animal art. We want to know by what sort of skill the many nests are woven together that we find it so hard even to disentangle ; we want to know how long they are in being built ; whether there is any particular choice in respect to location ; whether it be a rule, as is supposed, that the female bird is the architect, to the exclusion of her mate's efforts further than his supplying a part of the materials. Many such points remain to be cleared up. Then there is the question of variation, and its extent in the archi- tect of the same species in different quarters of its ranging area. How far is this carried, and how many varieties can be recorded from a single district, where the same list of materials is open to all the birds equally ? Variation shows individual opinion or taste among the builders as to the siutability of this or that sort of timber or fur- niture for their dwellings, and observations upon it thus increase our acquaintance ^vith the scope of ideas and habits characteristic of each species of bird." G 82 FIELD ORNITHOLOGY fine thread : indeed, this is an advisable precaution in most cases. Packing eggs for transportation requires much care, but the pre- cautions to be taken are obvious. I will only remark that there is no safer way than to leave them in their own nests, each Avrapped in cotton, Avith which the whole cavity is to be lightly filled ; the nests themselves being packed close enough to be perfectly steady. § 10.— CAEE OF A COLLECTION Well-ppeserved Specimens will last " for ever and a day," so far as natural decay is concerned. I have handled birds in good state, shot back in the twenties, and have no doubt that some eighteenth-century preparations are still extant. The precautions against defilement, mutilation, or other mechanical injury, are self- evident, and may be dismissed with the remark, that white plum- ages, especially if at all greasy, require the most care to guard against soiling. We have, however, to fight for our possessions against a host of enemies, individually despicable but collectively formidable, — foes so determined that untiring vigilance is required to ward off their attacks even temporarily, whilst in the end they prove invincible. It may be said that to be eaten up by insects is the natural end of all bird-skins not sooner destroyed. Insect Pests (Figs. 9, 10, 11, 12) with which Ave have to con- tend belong principally to the tAvo families Tineidce and Dermestidce — the former are moths, the latter beetles. The moths are of species identical Avith, and allied to, the common clothes-moth, Ti7iea flavifrontella, the carpet moth, T. tcqjetzella, etc., — small species observed flying about our apartments and museums, in May and during the summer. The beetles are several rather small thick-set species, principally of the genera Dermestes and Anthrenus. I am able to figure species of these genera, with their larval stages, and of tAVO other genera, Ptinus and Sitodrepa, through the attentions of Professor C. V. Riley, the eminent entomologist. The larvae {" cater- pillars" of the moths, and "grubs" of the beetles) appear to be the chief agents of the destruction. The presence of the mature insects is usually readily detected ; on disturbing an infested suite of specimens the moths flutter about, and the beetles craAAd as fast as they can into shelter, or simulate death. The insidious larvae, hoAvever, are not so easily observed, burroAving as they do among the feathers, or in the interior of a skin ; Avhilst the minute eggs are commonly altogether overlooked. But these insects are not long at Avork without leaving their unmistakable traces. Shreds of feathers float off Avhen a specimen is handled, or fly out on flip- CARE OF A COLLECTION 83 ping the skin with the fingers, and in bad cases even whole bundles ot plumes come away at a touch. Sometimes, leaving the pluma-e intact, insects eat away the horny covering of the bill and fee^t making an irreparable mutilation. It would appear that when the pests effect lodgment in any one skin, they usually finish it before attacking another, unless they are in great force. We may con- FiG. lffian bodies, are soon replaced func- tionally by permanent kidneys, and structurally by the testes of the male and the ovaries of the female. The cavity of the alxhrnien, or belly, is not separated from that of the thonu; or chest, by a com- plete muscular partition, or diaphragm. The great lateral hemi- spheres of the brain are not connected by a transverse commissure, or corpis cullosum. Air is always breathed by true lungs, never by gills. The blood, which may be cold or hot, has red oval nucleated corpuscles ; the heart has either three or four separate chambers, — the latter in birds, in which the circulation of the hot blood is com- pletely double, i.e. in the lungs and one side of the heart, in the body at large and the other side of the heart. The aortic arches are several ; or if but one, as in birds, it is the right, not the left as in mammals. The centra, or bodies, of the vertebrae are ossified, but have no terminal ejn^jhyses. The skull hinges upon the backbone by a single median protuberance, or cundyJe, and the bone {jxisioccipitid) bearing this condyle is completely ossified. The lower jaw consists of several separate pieces, the articular one of which hinges upon a mov- able cjuadrate bone; and there are other peculiarities in the formation of the skull. The ankle-joint is situated, not, as in Mammals, between the tarsal bones and those of the leg, but between two rows of tarsal bones. The skin is usually covered with outgrowths, in the form of scales or feathers. Difterent as are any living members of the class of Birds from an};- known Eeptiles, the characters of the two groups converge in geologic history so closely, that the presence of feathers in the former class, and their absence from the latter, is one of the most positive differences we have found. The oldest known birds are from the Jurassic rocks of Europe, and the Cretaceous l^eds of North America. These birds had teeth, and various other strons: pecixliarities of structure, Avhich no living members of the class have retained. AVES, or the Class of Birds, may be distinguished from other Sauropsida, for all that is known to the contrary, by the following sum of characters : The body is covered with feathers, a kind of skin-outgrowth no other animals possess. The blood is hot ; the circulation is completely double ; the heart is perfectly four- chambered ; there is but one (the right) aortic arch, and only one pulmonary artery springs from the heart ; the aortic and the pul- monary artery have each three semilunar valves. The lungs are fixed and moulded to the cavity of the chest, and some of the air- 94 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii passages run through them to admit air to other parts of the body, as under the skin and in various bones. Reproduction is oviparous ; the eggs are very large, in consequence of their copious yolk and white ; have a hard chalky shell, and are hatched outside the l)ody of the parent. There ai-e always four limbs, of which the fore or pectoral pair are strongly distinguished from the hind or pelvic pair by being modified into wings, fitted for flying, if at all, by means of feathers — not of skin as in the cases of such mammals, reptiles, and fishes as can fly. The terminal part of the limb is compressed and reduced, bearing never more than three digits, only two of which ever have claws, and no claws being the rule. There are not more than two separate carpals, or wrist-bones, in adult recent birds (with very rare exceptions) ; nor any distinct inter- clavicular bone. The clavicles are complete (with rare exceptions), and coalesce to form a "wish-bone" or "merrythought." The sternum, or breast-bone, is large, usually carinate, or keeled, and the ribs are attached to its sides only ; it is developed from two to five or more centres of ossification. The sacral vertebras proper have no expanded ribs abutting against the ilia; the ilia, or haunch-bones, are greatly prolonged forward ; the socket for the head of the femur, or thigh-bone, is a ring, not a cup ; the ischia and ^jw/yes are prolonged backward in parallel directions, and neither of these bones ever unites with its fellow in a ventral symphysis (except in Struthio and Rhea). The fibula, or outer bone of the leg, is incomplete below, taking no part in the ankle-joint. The astragalus, or upper bone of the tarsus, unites with the tiJna, or inner bone of the leg, leaving the ankle-joint between itself and other tarsal bones, the lower of which latter similarly unites with the bones of the instep, or metatarsus. There are never more than four metatarsal bones, and the same number of digits ; the first or inner metatarsal bone is usually free, and incomplete above ; the other three anchylose (fuse) together, and with distal tarsal bones, as already said, to form- a compound tarso-metatarsus. Recent birds, at any rate, have a certain saddle-shape of the ends of the bodies of some vertebras. Such birds have also no teeth and no fleshy lips ; the jaws are covered with horny or leathery integument, as the feet are also, when not feathered. The Position of the Class Aves among other Vertebrates is definite. Birds come in the scale of development next below the Class Mammalia, and no close links between Birds and Mammals are known ; the most bird-like known mammal, the duck-billed platypus of Australia {Ornithorhynchus paradoxus), being several steps beyond any known bird. Birds are the higher one of the two classes of Sauropsida — the lower class, Beptdia, connecting with the Batrachians (frogs, toads, newts, etc.), and so with the Fishes, Ichthyopsida. In DEFINITION OF BIRDS 95 this Vertebrate series, Birds constitute what is called a li'ujhhj ^specialised group ; that is to sa}^ a very particular offshoot, or, more literally, a side-issue, of the Vertebrate genealogical tree, which in the present geological era has become developed into very numerous (about 10,000) species, closely agreeing with one another in the peculiar sum of their physical character. In comparison with other classes of Vertebrates, all birds are much alike ; there is a less degree of difference among them than that found among the members of any of the other classes of Vertebrates ; their likeness to each other being strong, and their kind of difterence from any other Verte- brates being peculiar, makes them the highly specialised class they are recognised to be. The structural difference between a humming-bird and an ostrich, for exam}}le, is not greater in degree than that subsisting between the members of some of the orders of Eeptiles ; whence some hold, with reason, that Birds should not form a class Aves, but an order, or at most a sub-class, of Sauropsida, and so be compared not with a class Reptilia collectively, but with other sauropsidan orders, such as Chelonia (turtles), Sauria (lizards), Ophidia (serpents), etc. The practical convenience of starting with a "class" Aves, however, is so great, that such classificatory A-alue Avill probably long continue to be ascribed, as heretofore, to Birds collectively. I have spoken of Birds as a particular side-issue or lateral branch of the Vertebrate " tree of life " ; hence it is not to be supposed that they are in the direct line of genealogical descent. Though they stand as a group next below Mammals in the scale of evolution, it does not follow that Mammals were developed fx^om any such creature as a Bird has come to be, any more than that Birds have been evolved from any such Eeptiles as those of the pre- sent day. It is one of the popular misunderstandings of the Theory of Evolution, to imagine that all the lower forms of animals are in the genetic line of development of the higher forms ; that man, for example, was once a gorilla or a chimpanzee — actually such an ape. The theory simply requires all forms of life to be developed from some antecedent form, presumably, and in most cases certainly, lower in the scale of organisation. Thus man and the gorilla are both descendants of some common progenitor, more or less unlike either of these existing creatures. All mammals are similarly the modified descendants of some more primitive stock, from which stock sprano- also all Scmropsida, mediately or immediately ; therefore a Mammal is not a modified Bird, though higher in the scale ; and, though a Bird is a modified Eeptile, it is not a modification of any such snake or lizard as now exists. The most bird-like reptiles known are not the Pterodactyls, or Flying Eeptiles (Pterosauria), as might be supposed; but belong to that remarkable order, the Ornifho- scelida, comprising the Dinosaurians, which " present a large series of 96 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY modifications intermediate in structure between existing Reptilia and Arcs,'' and are therefore inferentially in the direct ancestral line of modern Birds. Geologic Succession of Birds. — Birds have been traced back in geologic time to Cretaceous and Jurassic epochs of the Mesozoic or Mid-Life period of the world's history. The earliest ornithichnitcs, — the fossils so called because supposed to indicate the presence of Birds by their footprints, Avere discovered about the year 1835 in the Triassic for- mation in Con- necticut. But the creatures which made these tracks are now reason- ably believed to have been all Dinosaurian rep- tiles. The oldest ornitholite, or fos- sil certainly known to be that of a true Bird, is the famous ArcJuv- opteryx, found by Andreas Wagner in 1861 in the Oolitic slate of Solenhofen in Bavaria. This has a long lizard-like tail of twenty ver- tebrae, from each of which springs a well-developed feather on each side ; feathers of tlie wings are also well preserved ; bones of the hand are not fused to- gether, as they are in recent Birds ; and the jaws bear true teeth. This Bird has served as the basis of one of tlie primary divi- sions of the class Aves ; though it has many reptilian characters, it is a true Bird. The great gap between this ancient Avian and latter-day birds has been to some extent bridged by the discovery and restoration of Birds from the Cretaceous formations of North America, such genera as IcUliyornis and Eesperornis forming types of Fig. 14. — Oldest known onutholngical treatise, illustrating also the art of lithography in the Jurassic period, engraved by Archwo- pteryx lUhographiai. From the original slab in the British Museum ; after A. Newton, Ency. Brit. DEFINITION OF BIRDS 97 two other primary divisions of the class, Odontotormm and Odontolcce, or Birds with teeth in sockets, and those with teeth in grooves. In both these genera the tail is short, as in ordinary birds. In Iclithy- m-iiis, though the wings are well developed, with fused metacarpals, Fig. 15. — Restoration of Hesperornis regalis. After Marsh. and the sternum is keeled, the vertebrae present the extraordinary primitive character of being biconcave. In Hesperornis the vertebrae are saddle-shaped, as usual, but the sternum is flat, as in the existing ostriches, and the wings are rudimentary, wanting metacarpals. Some twenty species of several genera of other American Cretaceous H 98 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY Birds have been described. Eemains of Birds multiply in the next period, the Tertiary. Those of the Eocene or early Tertiary are largely and longest known from discoveries made in the Paris Basin, among them the Gastornis j}arisiensis, at FiG. 16. — Restoration of Ichthyornis victor. After Marsh. least as large as an ostrich ; some of these belong to extinct genera, others to genera which still flourish ; none are known to have true teeth, or otherwise to be as primitive as the reptile-like forms of the Cretaceous. The Miocene or Middle Tertiary has proved specially rich in remains of Birds, including some of extinct SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 99 genera, but in largest proportion referable to modern ty})es. Later Tertiary (Pliocene and Post-pliocene) birds are almost all of living genera, and some are apparently of living species. Extinct birds coeval with man, their bones bearing his marks, are found in various caves. Sub-fossil birds' bones occur in shell -heaps (kitchen- middens) and elsewhere, of course contempor- aneous with man, and some of them scarcely prehistoric. One of the oldest of these is the gigantic ^pyornis maximus of Madagascar, of which we have not only the bones, but the egg. The immense Moas, or Dinornithes of New Zealand, were among the later of these to die, portions of skin, feathers, etc., of these great creatures having been found. With the Moa-remains are found those of Harpagornis, a raptorial bird large enough to have preyed upon the Moas. Finally, various birds have been exterminated in historic times, and some of them within the lifetime of persons now living. The Dodo of Mauri- tius, Didusineptiis, is the most celebrated one of these, of the living of which we have documentary evidence down to 1681 • the Solitaire of Kodriguez, Pezophaps solitariits, the Geant, Leguatia gigantea, and several others of the same Mascarene group of islands, ^ ,„ „ ^ i. ., rrn /-< * 1 ^7 ^'^- !'• — Restoration of are in smillar case. ihe b-reat Auk, Alca Leguatia gigantea. After impennis, is supposed to have become extinct ° '^^^ ' in 1844; a species of Parrot, Nestor produdus, was last known to be living in 1851 ; various parrots and other birds have likewise disappeared within a very few years. At least one North American bird, the Labrador Duck, Camptolcemus labradorius, seems likely soon to follow. (A. Newton, Encij. Brit, ninth edition, art. 'Birds.') § 2.— PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION Having seen what a Bird is, and how it is distinguished from other animals, our next Ijusiness is to inquire how birds are related to and distinguished from one another, as the basis of Classification : a prime object of ornithology, without the attainment of which birds, however pleasing they are to the senses, do not satisfy the mind, which always strives to make orderly GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY disposition of its knowledge, and so discover the reciprocal relations and interdependencies of the things it knows. Classification pre- supposes that there do exist such relations, according to which we may arrange objects in the manner which facilitates their compre- hension, by bringing together what is like, and separating what is unlike ; and that such relations are the results of fixed, inevitable law. It is, therefore, Taxonomy (Gr. ra^t?, taxis, arrangement, and i'o//o5, nomos, law), or the rational, lawful disposition of observed facts. Just as taxi- dermy is the art of fixing a bird's skin in a natural manner, so taxonomy is the science of arranging birds in the most natural manner ; in the way that brings out most clearly their natural affinities, and so shows them in their proper relations to one another. This is the greatest possible help to the memory in its attempt to retain its hold upon great numbers of facts. But taxonomy, which involves consideration of the greatest problems of ornithology, as of every other branch of biology (biology being the science of life and living things in general), is beset with the gravest difficulties, springing from our defective knowledge. We could only perfect our taxonomy by having before us a specimen of every kind of bird that exists, or ever existed ; and by thoroughly understanding how each is related to and differs from every other one. This is obvi- ously impossible ; in point of fact, we do not know all the birds now living, and only a small number of extinct birds have come to light ; so that many of the most important links in the chain of evidence are missing, and many more cannot be satisfactorily joined together. With these springs of ignorance and sources of error must be reckoned also the risk of going Avrong through the natural fallibility of the mind. The result is, that the " natural classifica- tion," like the elixir of life or the philosopher's stone, is a goal still distant ; and as a matter of fact, the present state of the ornitho- logical system is far from being satisfactory. It is obvious that birds, or any other objects, may be classified in numberless ways, — in as many ways as are afforded by all their cjualities and rela- tions,— to suit particular purposes, or to satisfy particular bents of mind. Hence have arisen, in the history of the science, very many different schedules of classification ; in fact, nearly every leader of ornithology has in his time proposed his own system, and enjoyed a more or less respectable and influential following. Systems have been based upon this or that set of characters, and erected from this or that preconception in the mind of the systematist. Down to quite recent days, the modifications of the external parts of birds, particulai'ly of the bill, feet, wings, and tail, were almost exclusively employed for purposes of classification ; and the mental point of .view was, that each species of bird was a separate creation, and as SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION loi much of a fixture in Nature's museum as any specimen in the naturaHst's cabinet. Crops of classifications have been sown in the fruitful soil of such blind error, but no lasting harvest has been reaped. The confusion thus engendered has brought about the inevitable reaction ; and the fashion of the present day is decidedly the opposite extreme, — that of counting external features of little consequence in comparison with anatomical characters. Too much time has been wasted in arguing the superiority of each of these characters for the purposes of classification ; as if a natural classi- fication should not be based upon all points of structure ! as if internal and external characters were not reciprocal and mutually exponent of each other ! But the genius of modern taxonomy seems to be so certainly right, — to be tending so surely, even if slowlj^, in the direction of the desired consummation, that all difterences of opinion, we may hope, soon will be settled, and defect of knowledge, not perversity of the mind, be the only obstacle left in the way of success. The taxonomic goal is not now to find the way in which birds may be most conveniently arranged, described, and catalogued ; but to discover their pedigree, and so construct their family-tree. Such a genealogical table, or phylum (Gr. (pvXov, phulon, tribe, race, stock), as it is called, is rightly con- sidered the only taxonomy worthy the name, — the only true or natural classification. In attempting this end, we proceed ujDon the belief that, as explained above, all birds, like all other animals and plants, are related to each other genetically, as off"spring are to parents ; and that to discover their genetic relationships is to bring out their true affinities, — in other words, to reconstruct the actual taxonomy of Nature. In this view, there can be but one natural classification, to the perfecting of which all increase in our knowledge of the structure of birds infallibly tends. The classification now in use, or coming into use, is the result of our best endeavours to accomplish this purpose, and represents Avhat approach we have made to this end. It is one of the great corollaries of that theorem of Evolution which most naturalists are satisfied has been demon- strated. It is necessarily a Morphological Classification ; that is, one based solely upon consideration of structure or form (/xop^v/, morpJie, form) ; and for the following reasons : Every offspring tends to take on precisely the structure or form of its parents, as its natural physical heritage ; and the principle involved, or the laio of heredity, would, if nothing interfered, keep the descendants perfectly tr^^e to the physical characters of their progenitors ; they would " breed true " and be exactly alike. But counter-influences are incessantly operative, in consequence of constantly varying external conditions of environ- ment ; the plasticity of organisation of all creatures rendering them GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY more or less susceptible of modification by such means, they become unlike their ancestors in various ways and to different degrees. On a large scale is thus accomplished, by natural selection and other natural agencies, just what man does in a small way in producing and maintaining different breeds of domestic animals. Obviously, ainidst such ceaselessly shifting scenes, degrees of likeness or unlike- ness of physical structure indicate with the greatest exactitude the nearness or remoteness of organisms in kinship. Morphological characters derived from examination of structure are therefore the surest guides we can have to the blood-relationships we desire to establish ; and such relationships are the natural affinities which all classification aims to discover and formulate. As already said, taxonomy consists in tracing pedigrees, and constructing the 'phylum ; it is like tracing any leaf or twig of a tree to its branchlet, this to its bough, this again to its trunk or main stem. The student will readily perceive, from what has been said, the impossibility of naturally arranging any considerable number of birds in any linear series of groups, one after the other. To do so means nothing more or less than the mechanical necessity of book-making, where groups have to succeed one another, in writing page after page. Some groups will follow naturally ; others will not ; no connected chain is possible, because no such single continuous series exists in nature. In cataloguing, or otherwise arranging a series of birds for descrip- tion, we simply begin with the highest — or lowest, if we prefer — groups, and make our juxtapositions as well as we can, in order to have the fewest breaks in the series. Mopphology being the safest, indeed the only safe, clue to natural affinities, and the key to all rational classification, the student cannot too carefully consider what is meant by this term, or too sedulously guard against misinterpreting morphological char- acters, and so turning the key the wrong way. The chief difficulty he will encounter comes from physiological adaptations of structure ; and this is something that must be thoroughly understood. The expression means that birds, or any animals, widely different in the sum of their morphological characters, may have certain parts of their organisation modified in the same way, thus bringing about a seemingly close resemblance between organisms really little related to each other. For example : a phalarope, a coot, and a grebe, all have lobate feet ; that is, their feet are fitted for swimming purposes in the same way, namely, by development of flaps or lobes on the toes. A striking but very superficial and therefore unimportant resemblance in a certain particular exists between these birds, on the strength of which they used to be classed together in a group called Pinnatipecles, or "fin -footed" birds. But, on sufficient ex- amination, these three birds are found to be very unlike in other SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 103 respects ; the sum of their unlikenesses requires us to separate them quite widely in any natural system. The group Pinnatipecles is therefore unnatural, and the appearance of atlinity is proved to be deceptive. Such resemblance in the condition of the feet is simply functional, or physiological, and is not correspondent with structural or morphological relationships. The relation, in short, between these three birds is analogical ; it is an inexact superficial resemblance between things profoundly unlike, and therefore having little liomologlcal or exact relationship. Analofjy is the apparent resemblance between things really unlike, — as the wing of a bird and the wing of a butterfly, as the lungs of a bird and the gills of a fish. Homology is the real resemblance or true relation between things, however different they may appear to be, — as the wing of a bird and the foreleg of a horse, the lungs of a bird and the swim- bladder of a fish. The former commonly rests upon mere func- tional, i.e. physiological, modifications ; the latter is grounded upon structural, i.e. morphological, identity or unity. Analogy is the correlative of physiology, homology of morphology ; but the two may be coincident, as when structures identical in morphology are used for the same purposes and are therefore physiologically identi- cal. Physiological diversity of structure is incessant, and continually interferes with morphological identity of structure, to obscure or obliterate the indications of affinity the latter would otherwise express clearly. It is obvious that birds might be classified physio- logically, according to their adaptive modifications or analogical resemblances, just as readily as upon any other basis : for example, into those that perch, those that walk, those that swim, etc. ; and, in fact, most early classifications largely rested upon such considera- tions. It is also evident, that when functional modifications happen to be coincident with structural affinities, — as when the turning of the lower larynx into a music-box coincides with a certain type of structure, — such modifications are of the greatest service in classi- fication, as corroborative evidence. But since all sound taxonomy rests on morphology, on real structural affinity, we must be on oiu" guard against those physiological " appearances " which are i)ro- verbially "deceptive." I trust I make the principle clear to the student. Its practical application is another matter, only to be learned in the school of experience. This matter of Homology or Analogy may be thus summed : Birds are liomologically related, or naturally allied or affined, according to the sum of like structural characters employed for similar purposes ; they are analogically related, only according to the sum of unlike characters employed for similar purposes. A loon and a cormorant, for instance, are closely affined, Ijecause they are both fitted in the same way for the pursuit of their prey by flying under water. A I04 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii dipper (family Cindidce) and a loon (family Colymhklce) are analogous, in so far as both are fitted to pursue their prey by flying under water ; but they stand near opposite extremes of the ornithological system ; they have little affinity beyond their common birdhood — very different structure being modified to attain the same end. So again, conversely, the crow has vocal organs almost identical in structure with those of the nightingale, and the organisation of the two birds is in other respects very similar ; their affinity or homology is therefore close, though the crow is a hoarse croaker, the nightingale an impassioned musician. The Reason why Mopphologieal Classifleation is so important as to justify or even require its adoption has been very clearly stated by Huxley, Avhose Avords I cannot do better than quote in this connection. SiJeaking of animals, not as physiological apparatuses merely ; not as related to other forms of life and to climatal conditions ; not as successive tenants of the earth ; but as fabrics, each of which is built upon a certain plan, he continues : " It is possible and conceivable that every animal should have been constructed upon a plan of its own, having no resemblance whatever to the plan of any other animal. For any reason we can discover to the contrary, that combination of natural forces which we term Life might have resulted from, or been manifested by, a series of infinitely diverse structures ; nor would anything in the nature of the case lead us to suspect a community of organisation between animals so diff"erent in habit and in appearance as a porpoise and a gazelle, an eagle and a crocodile, or a butterfly and a lobster. Had animals been thus independently organised, each working out its life by a mechanism j^eculiar to itself, such a classification as that now under contemplation would be obviously impossible ; a morpho- logical or structural classification plainly implying morphological or structural resemblances in the things classified. " As a matter of fact, however, no such mutual independence of animal forms exists in nature. On the contrary, the members of the animal kingdom, from the highest 'to the lowest, are marvellously connected. Every animal has something in common with all its fellows ; much, Avith many of them ; more, with a few ; and usually, so much with several, that it differs but little from them. "Now, a morphological classification is a statement of these gradations of likeness Avhich are observable in animal structures, and its objects and uses are manifold. In the first place, it strives to throw our knoAvledge of the facts Avhich underlie, and are the cause of, the similarities discerned, into the fewest possible general propositions, subordinated to one another, according to their reater or less degree of generality ; and in this Avay it answers the purpose of a memoria • tecJmica, without Avhich the mind Avould be SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 105 incompetent to grasp and retain the multifarious details of anatomical science. " But there is a second and even more important aspect of morphological classification. Every group in that classification is such in virtue of certain structural characters, which are not only common to the members of the group, but distinguish it from all others ; and the statement of these constitutes the definition of the group. "Thus, among animals with vertebras, the class Mammalia is definable as those which have two occipital condyles, with a well- ossified basi- occipital ; Avhich have each ramus of the mandible composed of a single piece of bone and articulated with the squamosal element of the skull ; and which possess mammee and non-nucleated red blood-corpuscles. "But this statement of the characters of the class Mammalia is something more than an arbitrary definition. It does not merely mean that naturalists agree to call such and such animals Mammalia; but it expresses, firstly, a generalisation based upon, and constantly verified by, very wide experience ; and, secondly, a belief arising out of that generalisation. The generalisation is that, in nature, the structures mentioned are always found associated together ; the belief is that they always have been, and always will be, found so associated. In other words, the definition of the class Mammalia is a statement of a law of correlation, or coexistence, of animal structures, from which the most important conclusions are deducible " (Introd. to Classif. of Animals, 8vo, London, 1869, pp. 2, 3). But broad as such laws of correlation of structure are, and important as are the conclusions deducible, we must constantly be on our guard against presuming upon the infallibility either of the data or of the deduction, as the author just quoted goes on to show. Such caution is specially required where there is no obvious reason for the particular combination that may be found to exist. In the case of the ostrich-like birds {Ratike), for example, we can understand how a flat, unkeeled breast-bone, a particular arrangement of the shoulder -bones, and a rudimentary state of the wing -bones, are found in combination, because all these modifications of structure are evidently related to loss of the power of flight ; and, in point of fact, no exception is known to the generalisation, that such conditions of the sternal, coraco-scapular, and humeral bones always coexist. But in all known struthious (ratite) birds, this state of the bones in mention coexists also with a peculiar modification of the bones of the palate, and no necessary connection between these two sets of diverse characters is conceivable. Now, if we only knew struthious birds, and found the combination in mention to hold with them all, we should doubtless declare our belief that any io6 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii bird having such palatal characters would also be found to possess such imperfect wing-apparatus. But this would be going too far : in fact, we know that the tinamous {Dromceognaih(c) have such a palate, yet have a keeled sternum and functionally developed wings. The real use and proper application of such generalisations is to teach the lesson, that creatures exhibiting such modified combina- tions of characters are genetically related to each other just in the degree to which they possess characters in common, and are genetically remote from each other in the degree to which they do not possess characters in common : i.e. that their similarities and distinctions of structure are sure indexes of their natural affinities. To take another case, derived from consideration of a large number of existing birds : it is an observed fact, that a particular arrange- ment of the plates upon the back of the tarsus, a peculiar modifica- tion of the lower larynx or voice organ, and an undeveloped or abortive condition of the first large feather on the hand, are found associated in a vast series of birds, constituting the group of Passeres called Oscines. What possil^le connection there can be between these three separate and apparently independent modifications we cannot even surmise ; but that they have some natural and necessary connection we cannot doubt, and that the connection is causal, not fortuitous, is a logical inference from the observed fact, that birds which present this particular combination are also closely related in other structural characters ; that is, that they have all been subjected to operative influences which have conspired to produce the modifications observed. Given, then, a bird, with a known oscine larynx, but unknown as to its feet and Avings, it Avould be a reasonable inference that these members, when discovered, would present the characters observed to occur in like cases. But the first lark {Alauclidce) examined would show the inference to be fallible ; for the tarsus of such a bird is diff"erently disposed, though a lark has an elaborate singing apparatus, and only nine instead of ten developed primaries. Once more : the development of a keeled sternum, a peculiar saddle-shape of certain vertebrae, and lack of true teeth, are characters coexisting in all the higher birds ; and, as far as these birds are concerned, we have no hint that such a combination is ever broken. In fact, however, the singular Creta- ceous Icldhyornis shows us a pattern of bird in which a well-keeled sternum and perfectly formed wings coexist with teeth in reptile- like jaws and with fish-like biconcave vertebrae. What Ave learn from this case indeed breaks down one of the most precise defini- tions we might have made (and indeed did make) respecting birds at large ; but in its failure Ave are taught hoAv great is the modifica- tion of geologically recent birds from their primitive generalised ancestry ; Ave learn something likeAvise of the steps of such SEC. 11 PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 107 modification, and of the length of time required for the process. It is the history of attempts to frame definitions of groups in zoology, that they are all liable to be negatived by new discoveries, and therefore to be broken down and require remodelling as our knowledge increases. It is to be readily perceived that the aljility to draw distinctions and make definitions of groups is as much the (jaiige of our ignmrmce as the test of our knowledge ; for all groups, like all species, come to be such by modification so gradual, so slight in each successive increment of difference, that, if all the steps of the process were before our eyes, Ave should be able to limit no groups whatever in a positive, unqualified manner. All would merge insensibly into one another, be inseparably linked in as many series as there have been actual lines of evolutionary jjrogress, and finally converge to the one or few starting-points of organised beings. Practically, however, the case is quite the reverse, — happily for the comfort of the working naturalist, however sadly the philosopher may deplore the ignorance implied. Degrees of likeness and unlikeness do exist, which when rightly interpreted enable us to mark off groups of all grades with much facility and precision, and thus erect a morphological classification which recognises and defines such degrees, and explains them upon the principles of Evolution. The way in which the principles of such classification are to be practically applied gives occasion for some further remarks upon Zoological Characters. — A " character," in zoological language, is any point of structure which may be perceived and described for the purpose of compai'ing or contrasting animals with one another. Thus, the conditions of the sternum, palate, tarsus, larynx, as noted in preceding paragraphs, are each of them characters which may be used in describing individual birds, or in framing definitions of groups of birds. Morphological characters, with which the classification Ave have adopted alone concerns itself, may be derived from the structure of a bird considered in any of its relations, or as affected by any of the conditions to Avhich it is subjected. Thus emhryological characters are those afforded by the bird during the progress of its development in the egg, from the almost structureless germ to the fully formed chick. Such characters of the embryo in its successive stages are of the utmost significance ; for it is a fact that the germ of each of the higher organisms goes through a series of developmental changes Avhich, at each succeeding step in the unfolding of its appropriate plan of structure, causes it to resemble the adult state of animals loAver than itself in the scale of organisation. In fine, the history of the evolution of every individval bird epitomises the history of those changes Avhich birds collectively have undergone in becoming Avhat loS GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii they are by modified descent from lower organisms. Such transitory stages of any embryo, therefore, give us glimpses of those evolu- tionary processes which have affected the group to which it belongs. Any bird, for example, when a germ, is at first on the plane of organisation of the very lowest known creatures, — one of the Protozoa, or single-celled animals. As its germ develops, and its structure becomes more complicated by the formation of parts and organs successively differentiated and specialised, it rises higher and higher in the scale of being. At a certain stage very early reached (for the steps by Avhich it becomes like any invertebrate are very speedily passed over) it resembles a fish in possessing gill-like slits, several aortic arches, no true kidneys, no amnion, etc. Further advanced, losing its gills, gaining kidneys and amnion, etc., it rises to the dignity of a reptile, and at this stage it is more like a reptile than like a bird ; having, for example, a number of separate bones of the wrist and ankle, no feathers, etc. The assumption of its own appropriate characters, Le. those by which it passes from a reptilian creature to become a bird, is always the last stage reached. AVe can thus actually see and note, inside any egg-shell, exactly those progressive steps of development of the individual bird which we believe to have been taken on a grand scale in nature for the evolution of the class Aves from lower forms of life ; and the lesson learned is fraught with significance. It is nothing less than the demonstration in ontogeny (genesis of the individual) of that 2)hylogemj (genesis of the race) by which groups of creatures come to be. The interior of any adult bird, again, furnishes us with all kinds of ordinary anatomical characters, derived from the way we perceive the different organs and systems of organs to be fashioned in themselves, and arranged with reference to one another. The finishing of the outward parts of a bird gives us the ordinary external characters, in the way in which the skin and its appendages are modified to form the covering of the bill and feet, and to fashion all kinds of feathers. Birds being of opposite sexes, and such difference being not only indicated in the essential sexual organs, but usually also in modifications in size or shape of the body or quality of the plumage and other outgrowths, a set of sexual characters are at our service. Birds are also sensibly modified in their outward details of feathering by times of the year when the plumage is changed, and this renders appreciation of seasonal characters possible. All such circumstances, and others that could be mentioned, such as effects of climate, of domestication, etc., in so far as they in any Avay affect the structure of birds, conspire to produce zoological characters, as these are above defined. Such characters, according as they result from more or less profound impressions made upon the organism, are of more or less " value " SEC. II rKINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 109 in taxonomy ; being of nil grades, from the trivial ones that serve to distinguish the nearest related species or varieties, to the fundamental ones that serve to mai'k off primary divisions. Thus the " character " of possessing a backbone is common to all animals of an immense series called Vertebraia. The " character " of feathers is common to all the class Aves ; of toothless jaws to all modern birds ; of a keeled sternum to all the sub-class Carinatce ; of feet fitted for perching to all the order Passeres ; of a musical apparatus to all the sub-order Oscines / of nine primaries to all the family Fringillidcc ; of crossed mandibles to all of the genus Loxia ; of white bands on the wings to all of the species Loxia leucoptera. There is thus seen a sliding scale of valuation of characters, from those involving the most profound or primitive modifications of structure to those resting upon the most superficial or ultimate imj)ressions. It will also be obvious that every iilterior modifica- tion presupposes inclusion of all the prior ones ; for a white- winged crossbill, to be itself, must be a loxian, fringilline, oscine, passerine, carinate, modern, avian, vertebrated animal. The more characters, of all grades, that any birds share in common, the more closely are they related, and conversely. Obviously, the possession of more or fewer characters in common resvdts in Degrees of Likeness. — Were all birds alike, or did they all differ by the same characters to the same degree, no classification would be possible. It is a matter of fact that they do exhibit all degrees of likeness possible within the limits of their Avian nature ; it is a matter of belief that these degrees are the necessary result of Evolution — of descent with modification from a common ancestry ; and that, being dependent upon that process, they are capable of explaining it if rightly interpreted. For example : Two white- Avinged crossbills, hatched in the same nest, scarcely differ percep- tibly (except in sexual characters) from each other, and from the pair that laid the eggs. We call them " specifically " identical : and the sum of the differences by which they are distinguished from any other kinds of crossbills is their " specific character." All the individual crossbills which exhibit this particular sum consti- tute a " species." In this case, the genetic relationship of offspring and parent is unquestionable — it is an observed fact. Now turn to the extremely opposite case. The difference between our cross- bills and the Cretaceous Ichthyornis is enormous : I suppose it is nearly the greatest known to subsist between any two birds what- soever. But the Ichfhi/ornis and the Loxia are also separated by a correspondingly immense interval of time, and presumably by correspondingly enormous differences in conditions of environment — in their physical surroundings. It is a logical inference that these two things — difference in physical structure and difference in GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY physical environment — are in some way correlated and co-ordinated. If we presume, upon the theory of evolution, that, despite the great difference, a crossbill is genetically related to some such bird as an Ichthyornis, as truly as it is to its actual parents, only much more remotely, and that the difference is due to modifications impressed upon its stock in the course of time, conformably with changing conditions of environment, we shall have a better explanation of the difference than any other as yet offered — an explanation, more- over, Avhich is corroborated by all the related facts we know, and with wliich no known facts are irreconcilable. But to correctly gauge and formulate the degrees of likeness or unlikeness between any two birds is to correctly " classify " them ; and if these degrees rest, as we l^elieve they do, upon nearness or remoteness of genetic relationship, classification upon such basis becomes the truest attainable formulation of " natural affinities." It is the province of morphological classification to search out those natural affinities Avhich the structure of birds indicates, and express them by divid- ing birds into groups, and subdividing these into other groups, of greater or lesser value or grade, according to the fewer or more characters shared in common, — that is, according to degrees of like- ness ; that is, again, according to genealogical relationship or con- sanguinity. Zoological Groups. — To carry any scheme of classification into practical effect, naturalists have found it necessary to invent and apply a system of grouping objects whereby the like may come together and be separated from the unlike. They have also found it expedient to give names to all these groups, of whatever grade, such as class, order, family, genus, species, etc. ; and to stamp each such group with the value of its grade, or its relative rank in the scale, so that it may become currency among naturalists. The student must observe, in the first place, that the value of each such coinage is wholly arbitrary, until sanctioned and fixed by common consent. The term " class," for example, simply indicates that naturalists agree to use that word to designate a conventional group of a particular grade or value. Indispensable as is some such acceptable medium of exchange of ideas among naturalists, their groups are not fixed, have no natural value, and in fact have no actual exist- ence in the treasury of Nature. It cannot be too strongly impressed upon the student that Nature makes no bounds, — Natura nonfacit saltus ; there are no such abrupt transitions in the unfolding of Nature's plan, no such breaks in the chain of being, as he would be led to suppose by our method of defining and naming groups. He must consider the words " class," " order," etc., as wholly arbitrary terms, invented and designed to express our ideas of the relations which subsist between any animals or sets of animals. Thus, for SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION in example, by the term the " Class of Birds " we signify simply the kind and degree of likeness which all birds share, snch being also the kind and degree of their unlikeness from any other animals ; the word " class " being simply the name or handle of the general- isation we make respecting their relations with one another and with other animals ; it represents an abstract idea, is the expression of a relation. True, all birds emhody the idea ; but " class " is nevertheless an abstraction. Now, as intimated earlier in this essay, the definition of the idea we attach to the term — the limita- tion of the class Aves — depends entirely upon how much we know of the relation intended to be expressed. It so happens that no animals are known which cannot be decided to belong, or not to belong, to the conventional class of birds, because we have found it convenient and expedient to consider the presence of feathers a fair criterion or necessary qualification. But what, when an animal is discovered the covering of whose body is half-way between the scales of a lizard and the plumes of a bird, and whose structure is otherwise as equivocal ? This may happen any day. A feather is certainly a modified scale ; a feather has doubtless been developed out of a scale. In the case supposed, we should have to modify our definition of the " Class of Birds " ; that is, change our ideas upon the subject, and alter the boundary-line we established between the classes of birds and reptiles ; whereas, were a " class " something naturally definite, independent, and fixed, all that we could learn about it would only tend to establish it more surely. The same obscurity and uncertainty of definition attaches to groups of every grade — from the Animal " Kingdom " itself, which cannot be cut clear of the Vegetable " Kingdom " — down through classes, orders, families, genera, species, and varieties — yes, to the individual itself, which, however unmistakable among higher organisms, cannot always 1)6 predicated of the lowermost forms of Life. Such divisions, of whatever grade, as we are able to establish for the purposes of classification, depend entirely upon the breaks and defects in our knowledge. There is no such thing as drawing hard-and-fast lines anywhere, for none such exist in Nature. Taxonomie Equivalence of Groups. — But, however arbitrary they may be, or however obscure or fluctuating may be their boundaries, groups we must have in zoology, and groups of different grades, to express different degrees of likeness of the objects examined, and so to classify them. It is a great convenience, moreover, to have a recognised sliding-scale of valuation of groups from the highest to the lowest, and an accepted valuation. Just as in a thermometric scale, there are degrees designated as those of the boiling-point of water, the heat of the blood, the freezing of water, of mercury, etc. ; so there are certain degrees of likeness GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY conventionally designated as those of da&s, order, family, genus, and species; always accepted in the order here given, from higher to lower groups. (There are various others, and especially a number of intermediate groups, generally distinguished by the prefix suh-, as suh-family ; but those here given are generally adopted by English- speaking naturalists, and sufiice to illustrate the point I wish to make.) It may sound like a truism to say that groups of the same grade, bearing the same name, whatever that may be, must be of the same value, — must be based upon and distinguished by charac- ters of equal or equivalent importance. Equivalence of groups is necessary to the stability and harmony of any classificatory system. It will not do to frame an order upon one set of characters here, and there a family upon a similar set of characters ; but order must differ from order, and family from family, by an equal or corre- sponding amount of difference. Let a group called a family difier as much from the other families in its own order as it does from some other order, and by this very circumstance it is not a family but an order itself. It seems a very simple proposition, but it is too often ignored, and always with practical ill result. Two points should be remembered here : First, that absolute size or numerical bulk of a group has nothing to do with its taxonomic value : one order may contain a thousand species, and another be represented by a single species, without having its ordinal valuation affected thereby. Secondly, any given character may assume different importance, or be of different value, in its application to diflerent groups. Thus, the number of primaries, whether nine or ten, is a family charac- ter almost throughout Oscines; but in one oscine family (Vireonida') it has scarcely generic value. It is difficult, however, to determine such a point as this without long experience. Nor is it possible, in fact, to make our groups correspond in value with entire exactitude. The most Ave can hope for is a reasonable approximation. As in the thermometric simile above given, "blood-heat" and other points fluctuate, so does order not always correspond with order, nor family with family, in actual significance. What degree of diff'er- ence shall be "ordinal" ? "What shall be a difference of "family"? What shall be " generic " and Avhat " specific " differences 1 Such questions are more easily asked than answered. They demand critical consideration. Valuation of Characters. — In a general Avay, of course, the greater the difference between any two objects, the more " import- ant" or "fundamental" are the "characters" by which they are distinguished. But what makes a chargicter "important" or the reverse ? Obviously, what it signifies represents its importance. We are classifying morphologically, and upon the theory of Evolu- tion ; and in such a system a character is important or the reverse. SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 113 simply as an exponent of the principles, or an illustration of the facts, of evohitionary processes of Nature, according to the unfold- ing of whose plans of animal fabrics the Avliole structure of living beings has been built up. Why is the possession of a backbone such a " fundamental " character that it is used to establish one of the primary branches of the animal kingdom % It is not because so many millions of creatures possess it, but because it was introduced so early in the evolutionary process, and because its introduction led to the most profound modification of the whole structure of the animals which became possessed of a vertebral column. Why is the possession by a bird of biconcave vertebrai so significant % Not because all modern birds have saddle-shaped vertebrae, but because to have biconcave vertebrae is to be quoad hoc fish-like. Why is pre- sence or absence of teeth so important ? Not that teeth served those old birds better than a horny beak serves modern ones, 1)ut because teeth are a reptilian character. Obviously, to be fish-like or reptile-like is to be by so much unbirdlike ; the degree of differ- ence thus indicated is enormous ; and a character that indicates such degree of difference is proportionally "important" or "fundamental," — just what we were after. By knowledge of facts like these, and by the same process of reasoning, a naturalist of tact, sagacity, and experience is able to put a pretty fair valuation upon any given character ; he acquires the faculty of perceiving its significance, and according to what it signifies does it possess for him its taxonomic importance. As a matter of fact, it seems that characters of all sorts are to be estimated chronologically. For, if animals have come to be what they are by any process that took time to be accom- plished, the characters earliest established are likely to be the most fundamental ones, ujion the introduction of which the most import- ant train of consequences ensue. Feathers, for example, as the Arclueopteryx teaches us, were in full bloom in the Jurassic period, and they are still the most characteristic possession of birds : all birds have them ; they are a class character. If they had been taken on quite recently, we may infer that many creatures otherwise entii'ely avian might not possess them, and they would have in classification less significance than that now rightly attributed to them. On the other hand, we cannot suppose that the finishing touches, by which, in the presence of white bands on the wings of Loxia leucoptera, and their absence in Loxia cnrvirostra, these two "species" are distinguished, were not very lately given to these birds. It is a very late step in the process, and correspondingly in- significant ; it is of that value or importance which we call "specific." The same method of reasoning is available for determining the value of any character whatever, and so of estimating the grade of the group which we establish upon such character. As a rule, I 114 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY tart ii therefore, the length of time a character has been in existence, and its taxonomic value, are correlated, and each is the exponent of the other. "Types of Structure." — In no department of natural history has the late revolution in biological thought been more effective than in remodelling, presumably for the better, the ideas underlying classification. In earlier days, when " species " were supposed to be independent creations, it was natural and almost inevitable to regard them as fixed facts in nature. A species was as actual and tangible as an individual, and the notion was, that, given any two specimens, it should be perfectly possible to decide whether they were of the same or different species, according to Avhether or not they answered the " specific characters " laid down for them. The same fancy vitiated all ideas upon the subject of genera, families, and higher groups. A "genus" was to be discovered in nature, just like a species ; to be named and defined. Then species that answered the definition were " typical " ; those that did not do so well were " sub-typical " ; those that did worse were " aberrant." A good deal was said of "types of structure," much as if living crea- tures were originally run into moulds, like casting type-metal, to receive some indelible stamp ; Avhile — to carry out my simile — it was supposed that by looking at some particular aspect of such an animal, as at the face of a printer's type, it could be determined in what box in the case the creature should be put ; the boxes them- selves being supposed to be arranged by Nature in some particular way to make them fit perfectly alongside each other by threes or fives, or in stars and circles, or what not. How much ingenuity was wasted in striving to put together such a Chinese puzzle as these fancies made of Nature's processes and results, I need not say ; suffice it, that such views have become extinct, by the method of natural selection, and others, apparently better fitted to survive, are now in the struggle for existence. Kightly appreciated, how- ever, the expression which heads this paragraph is a proper one. There are numberless " types of structure." It is perfectly proper to speak of the " vertebrate type," meaning thereby the whole plan of organisation of any vertebrate, if we clearly understand that such a type is not an independent or original model conformably with which all backboned animals were separately created, but that it is one modification of some more general plan of organisation, the un- folding of which may or did result in other besides vertebrated animals ; and that the successive modifications of the vertebrate plan resulted in other forms, equally to be regarded as "types," as the reptilian, the avian, the mammalian. Upon this understanding, a group of any grade in the animal kingdom is a " type of struc- ture," of more general or more special significance, presumably SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 115 accordinsf to the longer or shorter time it has been in existence. An individual specimen is " typical " of a species, a species is " typical " of a genus, etc., if it has not had time enough to be modified away from the characters which such species or genus expresses. Any set of individuals, that is, any progeny, which become modified to a degree from their progenitors, introduce a new type ; and continually increasing modification makes such a type specific, generic, and so on, in succession of time. There must have been a time, for example, when the Avian and Reptilian " types " began to divei'ge from each other, or, rather, to branch apart from their common ancestry. In the initial step of their divergence, when their respective types Avere beginning to be formed, the differ- ence may have been infinitesimal. A little farther along, the incre- ment of diff'erence became, let us say, equivalent to that which serves to distinguish two species. Wider and wider divergence increased the dift'erence, till genera, families, orders, and finally the classes of Reptllia and Arcs, became established. In one sense, therefore, — and it is the usual sense of the term, — the " type " of a bird is that one which is farthest removed from the reptilian type, — which is most highly specialised by differentiation to the last degree from the char- acters of its primitive ancestors. One of the Oscines, as a thrush or sparrow, would answer to such a type, having lost the low, primi- tive, generalised structure of its early progenitors, and acquired very special characters of its own, representing the extreme modification which the stock whence it sprang has undergone. In a broader sense, however, the type of a bird is simply the stock from which it originated : and in such sense the highest birds are the least typical, being the fai'thest removed and the most modified derivatives of such stock, the charactei'S of which are consequently remodelled and obscured to the last degree. Two opposite ideas have evidently been confused in the use of the word " Type." They may be dis- tinguished by inventing the word teleotype (Gr. xeAeos, tdeos, final, i.e. accomplished or determined ; formed like teleolorjj), etc.) in the usual sense of the word type ; and using the word we already possess, prototype (Gr. irpw-o^, 2)rotos, first, leading, determining), in the broader sense of the earlier plan whence any teleotype has been derived by modification. Thixs, Ichthyornis or Archa'opteryx is proto- typic of modern birds, any of which are teleotypic of their ancestors. It may be further observed that any form which is teleotypic in its own group is prototypic of those derived from it. Thus, the Archceopteryx, so prototypic of modern birds, was a very highly sjDecialised teleotype of its own ancestry. A little reflection will also make it clear that the same principle of antitypes (opposed types) is applicable to any of our groups in zoology. Any (jroup is teleotypic of the next greater grovp of tvhich it is a member ; prototypic of ii6 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii ilie next lesser one. Any species is teleotypic of its genus ; any genus, of its family ; any family, of its order ; and conversely ; that is to say, any species represents one of the ulterior modifications of the plan of its genus. The Class of Birds, for example, is one of the several teleotypes of Vertebrata, i.e. of the vertebrate plan of struc- ture ; representing, as it does, one of several ways in which the vertebrate prototype is accomplished. Conversely, the Class of Birds is prototypical of its several orders, representing the plan Avhich these orders severally unfold in different ways. And so on, throughout any series of animals, backward and forward in the process of their evolution : any given form being teleotypic of its predecessors, prototypic of its successors. All existing forms are necessai'ilj^ teleotypic, — only prototypic for the future. Prototype, in the sense here conveyed, indicates what is often expressed by the word archetype. But the latter, as I understand its use by Owen and others, signifies an ideal plan never actually realised ; the "archetype of the vertebrate skeleton," for example, being some- thing no vertebrate ever possessed, but a theoretical model — a generalisation from all known skeletons. The correspondence of my use of " prototypic " with a common employment of " archetypic," and of "teleotypic" as including both " attypic " and " etypic," is noted below. ^ The actual and visible genetic relationships of living forms being practically restricted to individuals of the same species, — parents and offspring specifically identical, — it would seem at first sight that species must be the modified descendants of their respective genera, in order to be teleotypic of any such next higher group. But nothing descends from a genus, or any other group ; every- thing descends from individuals ; a genus, like any other group, is an abstract statement of a relation, not a begetter of anything. To illustrate : the " genus Tardus " is represented, let us say, by a score of species : if these species be rightly allocated in the genus, they are all the modified descendants of a form which was, before they severally branched off, a specific form ; and the " genus ^ '^Archetypical characters are those which a grouiJ derives from its i^rogenitor, and with wliich it commeuces, but whicli in niucli modified descendants are lost ; snch, for examjile, is the dental formula of the Educabilia (M | PM ^ C ^ 1 f x 2), — a formula, as shown by Owen, very prevalent among early members of the group, but generally dejiarted from more or less in those of the existing faunas. Attyjncal characters are those to the acquisition of which, as a matter of fact, we find that forms, in their journey to a specialised condition, tend. . . . Etypical characters are exceptional ones, and which are exhibited by au eccentric ofl'shoot from the common stock of a group " (Gill, I'r. Am. Assoc. Adv. ,Sci., xx. 1873, p. 293). To illustrate in birds : A generalised lizard-like type of sternum is arche(y2nc of any bird's ster- num. The sternum of the lizard-like animals whence birds actually descended is prototypic ; the keeled sternum of a carinate bird is attypical in most birds, etypical in the jieculiar state in which it is found in Stringopis ; but equally teleotypic in both instances. SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 117 Turdtis " in the abstract is simply that form ; and that form is prototypic of its derivatives. In the concrete, as represented by its teleotypes, the genus Turdus sums the modifications -which these have collectively undergone, without specifj'ing the particular modifications of any of them ; it expresses the way in which they are all like one another, and in which they are all unlike the re- presentatives of any other genus. Thus what is above advanced is seen to hold, though genera and all other groups are actual descendants of individuals specifically identical. Generalised and Specialised Forms. — Taking any one group of animals — say the genus Turdus, of numerous species — and con- sidering it apart from any other group, we perceive that it represents a certain assemblage of characters peculiar to itself, aside from th-ose more fundamental ones it includes of its family, order, etc. Its particular characters we call " generic." Among the numerous teleotypic forms it includes, there is a wide range of specific varia- tion, within the limits of generic relationship. Some of its species are modified farther away than some others are from the generic standard or type to which all conform more or less perfectly. The former, having more peculiarities of their own, are said to be the most specialised ; the latter, having fewer peculiarities, are the least specialised. Those that are the least specialised are obviously the most generalised ; and this means that we believe them to be nearest to the stock whence all have together descended with modification. The application of this illustration to great groups shows us the jninciple upon which any form is said to be generalised or s])ecialised. The Ichthyornis, Avith its fish-like vertebrae, reptile-like teeth, bird- like sternum and shoulder-girdle, is a very generalised form. A thrush is the opposite extreme of a highly specialised form. The two are also separated by an enormous interval of time ; one being very old, the other quite new ; a chronological sequence is here perceived. Since the evolutionary processes concerned in the modi- fication on the whole represent progress from simplicity to com- plexity of organisation, and therefore ascent in the scale of organisation, a generalised type, an ancient type, and a sim2)le type are on the whole synonymous, and to be contrasted with forms specialised, recent, and complex. They therefore resiDectively corre- spond to "Low" and "High" in the Scale of Organisation. — All existing birds are very closely related, notwithstanding the great numerical preponderance of the class in the present geological epoch. This outbreak, as it were, of birds upon the modern scene, is like the nearly simultaneous bursting into bloom of a mass of flowers at the end of one branch of the Sauropsidan stem. All modern birds, in fact, are strongly specialised forms, so much so that iiS GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii it is difficult to predicate " high " or " low" within such a narrow scale. The great group Passeres, for example, comprehending a majority of all known birds, is scarcely more different from other birds than are the families of reptiles from each other, and among Passeres we have little to go upon in deciding " high " or " low " beyond the musical ability of Oscines. It is hard to see much difference in actual complexity of organisation between those birds regarded as the lowest, as an ostrich or a penguin, and those con- ceded to be highest, as a swallow or sparrow. Nevertheless, in a larger perspective, as between a fish, a reptile, and a bird, the student will readily perceive the bearing of the ideas attached to the terms " low " and " high " in the scale of organisation. Creatures rise in the scale by a number of correlated modifications and in the course of time (for it takes time to evolve a class of birds from sauropsidan stock as really as it does to develop the germ of an egg into the body of a chick). Progressive differentiation and specialisa- tion of structure and function in due course elaborates diversity from sameness, complexity from simplicity, the " high " special from the " loAY " general plan of organisation ; the culmination in man of the vertebrate type, first faintly foreshadowed in the embryonic Ascidian. No one should venture to foretell the result of infinit- esimal increments in elevation of structure and function, nor pre- sume to limit the infinite possibilities of evolutionary processes, either in this actual world or in a foretold next one. As to " evidences of design " in the plan of organised beings, it may be said simply that every creature is perfectly " designed " or fitted for its appropriate activities, and perfectly adapted to its conditions of environment. In fact, it must be so fitted and adapted, or it would perish. Whether it so determines itself, or is so determined, is a teleological question. The truth remains that every creature is perfect in its own way. A worm is as perfectly fitted to be a worm, as is a bird to be a bird ; in fact, were it not, it would either turn into something else, or cease to be. A spade is as perfect an organisation of the spade hind, as is the steam-engine of that kind of an organisation ; though the difference in complexity of structure and functional capacity, like that between the lowly organised ascidian generality and the highly organised avian speciality, is enormous. One word more : The class of mammals is highest in the scale of organisation. The class of birds is next highest. But it does not follow, from this relation sustained by Mammalia and Aves collectively, that every mammal must be more highly organised than every bird. It is difficult to say how a mole or a mouse is a more elaborate or more capable creature than a canary-bird, physic- ally or mentally. The relative rank of two groups is determined SFX. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 119 by balancing the aggregate of their structural characters. In large series, the average of development, not the extremes either way, is taken into account ; so that the loAvest members of a higher group may be below the highest members of the next lower group. The common phrase, "below par," or "above par," is most applicable to such cases. Machinery of Classification. — The inexperienced student may be glad to be given some explanation of the way in which the taxonomic principles we have discussed are applied, and carried into practical effect in classifying birds. Our machinery for that purpose is our inheritance from those natm-alists who held very different views from those which touch the evolutionary key-note of modern classification. It is clumsy, and does not work well as a means of expressing the relations we now believe to be sustained by all organ- isms toward one another ; but it is the best Ave have. Systematic zoology, or the practice of classification, has failed to keep pace with the principles of the science ; we are greatly in need of some new and sharper " tools of thought," Avhich shall do for zoology what the system of symbols and formulae has done for chemistry. We, want some symholic formulation of our hioivledge. The invention of a prac- ticable scheme of classification and nomenclature, which should enable us to formulate Avhat Ave mean by Turdus viscivorus, as a chemist symbolises by SO^H., Avhat he understands hydrated sul- phuric acid to be, Avould be an inestimable boon to Avorking naturalists. The mapping out of groups Avith connecting lines to indicate their genetic relations, in the form of the phylum, is a common practice ; but that, like any other pictorial representation of a " family tree," is not the graphic symbolisation required. The first steps in this direction have been tentatively taken already by the late Mr. A. H. ClaiTod and others : Ave already have a mother of the required iuA'ention in the necessity of the case, and may hope that the father Avill not be long in coming. Under the present system. Birds are called a " Class " of Verte- brates, and are subdivided into "orders," "families," "genera," "species," and "varieties," as already sufficiently indicated. Groups intermediate to any of these may be recognised ; and if so, are usually distinguished by the prefix sub-. Many other terms are in occasional use, as "tribe," "race," "series," "cohort," "supei'- family " ; but the six first mentioned are the best established ones among English-speaking naturalists. Their seqixence is fixed, as above, from higher to lower, in relative rank.^ With the exceptions ^ The exiiression "higher group," iu the sense of i-elative rank in the taxonomic scale, will of course be distinguished from the same expression when applied to the relative rank in the scale of organisation of the objects classified. An order of birds is a "higher group" than a family of birds, in the former sense, but no higher than an order of worms, iu the latter sense. GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY to be presently noted, the names of groups are arbitrar}^, at the will of the person who establishes and designates them. The framer of a genus, or the describer of a species, calls it what he pleases, and the name he gives holds, subject to certain statutory regulations which naturalists generally agree to abide by. The exceptions are the names of families and sub-families, the former commonly being made to end in -%d(B, the latter in -ince, : family Turclidm ; sub-family Turdince. This is a great convenience, since we always know the rank intended to be noted by these word -forms. The names of groups higher than species are almost invariably single Avords ; as, order Fasseres ; but sometimes, especially in cases of intermediate groups, two words are used, one qualifying the other ; as, sub-order Passeres Acromyodi, or oscine Passeres. A generic or sub-generic name is always a single word ; these, and the names of all higher groups, invariably begin with a capital letter. Until quite recently, the scientific name of any individual bird almost invariably consisted of two terms, generic and specific, — the name of the genus, followed by the name of the species ; as, Turdus viscivorus, for the missel -thrush. This is the "binomial nomen- clature" (badly so called, for "binominal" or "bionymic" would be better) ; introduced by Linnfeus in the middle of the last century. It was a great improvement upon the former method of giving either single arbitrary names to birds, often a mere Latin translation of their vernacular nickname, or long descriptive names of several words ; probably no other single improvement in a method of nomenclature ever did so much' to make the technique of nomen- clature systematic. To couple the two terms at all was a great thing, the convenience of which we who never felt its want can hardly appreciate. To follow the generic by the specific term was itself of the same advantage that it is to have the Smiths and Browns of a directory entered under S and B, instead of by Johns and Jameses ; besides according with the genius of the Romance languages, which commonly put the adjective after the noun. A Frenchman, for example, would say, Bec-crois6 mix ailes blanches de rAm&ique septentrionale, or "Bill-crossed to the wings white of the America north," where we should say, "North American white- Avinged Crossbill," and Linnjeus would have written Loxla leucoptera. The binomial scheme worked so well that it came to have the authority and force of a statute, which few subsequent naturalists have been inclined, and fewer have ventured, to violate ; while it became an ex post facto law to prior naturalists, ruling them out of court altogether, as far as the legitimacy of any of the names they had bestowed was concerned. It necessarily rested, however, or at any rate proceeded upon, the false idea of a species as a fixity. Linnaeus himself experienced the inadequacy of his system to deal SEC. II PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CLASSIFICATION 121 binomially with those lesser groups than species, commonly called " varieties," now better designated as " conspecies " or " subspecies '' ; and he often used a third word, separated however from the binomial name by intervention of the sign "var." or some other symbol. Thus, if he had supposed an American crossbill to be a variety of a European Loxla leucojjtera, he might have called it Loxia leucoptera, a, americana. Some years ago, in treating of this subject, I urged the necessity of recognising by name a great number of forms of our birds intermediate between nominal species, and connecting the latter by links so perfect, that our handling of species required thorough reconsideration. The dilemma arose, through our very intimate knowledge of the climatic and geographical variation of species, either to discard a great numljer that had been described, and so ignore all the ultimate modifications of our bird-forms ; or else to recognise as good species the same large number of forms that we knew shaded into each so completely that no specific character could be assigned. In the original edition of the Key to North Anierican Birds (1872), I compromised the matter by reducing to the rank of varieties the nominal species that were known or believed to inter- grade ; and the original edition of my Check List (1873) distinguished such by the sign " var." intervening between the specific and the subspecific name. I subsequently determined to do away Avith the superfluous term "var.," and in the next edition of the Check List (1882) reverted to a purely trinomial system of naming the equi- vocal forms ; as, Loxia curvirostra americana. This system is found to work well, and seems likely to come into general use.^ The Student cannot be too well assured that no such things as species, in the old sense of the word, exist in nature, any more than have genera or families an actual existence. Indeed they cannot be, if there is any truth in the principles discussed in our earlier paragraphs. Species are simply ulterior modifications, which once were, if they be not still, inseparably linked together ; and their nominal recognition is a pure convention, like that of a genus. More practically hinges upon the way we regard them than turns upon our establishment of higher groups, simply because upon the way we decide in this case depends the scientific labelUn/j of specimens. If we are speaking of a robin, we do not ordinarily concern our- selves with the family or order it belongs to, but we do require a ^ Since the above was penned, the trinominal or trionyniic system of nomeucLature has been formulated and fully adopted by the conmiittee on Nomenclature of the American Ornithologists' Union, of which Dr. Cones was chairman ; and the decision of that body of uomenclatural legislators, as expressed in its Canons of Nom.enclature, has been recognised as authoritative not only by American ornitholo- gists in general, but by naturalists in other departments of zoology, notably mam- malogy, herpetology, ichthyology, malacology, anil entomology. The scheme has become well known to British ornithologists as a distinctive feature of the "American School." GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY technical name for constant use. That name is compounded of its genus, species, and variety. No infallible ride can be laid down for determining Avhat shall Ije held to Ije a species, what a conspecies, subspecies, or variety. It is a matter of tact and experience, like the appreciation of the value of any other group in zoology. There is, however, a convention upon the subject, which the present Avorkers in ornithology in Ameiica find available ; and there is no better rule to go by. They treat as " specific " any form, however little different from the next, that is not known or believed to inter- grade with that next one ; between which and the next one no intermediate equivocal specimens are forthcoming, and none, con- sequently, are supposed to exist. This is to imply that the differen- tiation is accomplished, the links are lost, and the characters actually become " specific." They treat as " varietal " of each other any forms, however different in their extreme manifestation, which they know to intergrade, having the intermediate specimens before them, or which they believe with any good reason do intergrade. If the links still exist, the differentiation is still incomplete, and the characters are not specific, but only varietal, in the literal sense of these terms. In the latter case, the oldest name is retained as the specific one, and to it is appended the varietal designation : as, T'urdm migratorius propinqims. The specific and subspecific words are preferably Avritten with a small initial letter, even when derived from the name of a person or place, after the example of Dr. P. L. Sclater and other eminent British naturalists. One other term than those just considered sometimes forms part of a bird's scientific name : this is the suhgemts. When introduced, it always follows the generic term, in parentheses ; thus, Turdus (Merula) torquatus. This is cumbrous, especially when there are already three terms, and is little used. I have latterly discarded it altogether. There is no difference in kind between a suljgenus and a genus, — it is a difference of slight degree merely; and modern genera have so multiplied that one can easily find a single name for any generic refinement he may wish to indulge. It has always been customary to write after the bird's name the name of the original describer of the species, — originally and properly, as the authority or voucher for the validity of the species named. But as genera multiplied, it was often found necessary to change the generic name, the species being placed in another genus than that to which its original namer referred it. The name of the person who originated the new combination came to be generally suffixed, ])resumably as the authority for the validity of the classi- fication implied. As this was to ignore the proprietorship of the original describer, it became customary to retain that describer's name in parentheses and add that of the classifier ; thus, Ttvrdus EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS migratorius Linnreus ; Planesticus migmiorim (Linn.) Bonaparte. The practice still prevails. It would take me too far to go fully into the rules of nomen- clature : some few points may be noted. A proper sense of justice to the describers of new genera, species, and varieties prompts us to preserve inviolate the names they see fit to bestow, with certain salutary provisions. Hence arises the "law of priority." The^r.s^ name given since 1758 is to be retained and used, if it can be iden- tified with reasonable certitude ; that is, if we think we know what the giver meant by it. But it is to be discarded, and the next name in priority of time substituted, if it is "glaringly false or of express absurdity,"— as calling an English bird " afrkanus," or a black one " ulbus." No generic name can be duplicated in zoology, and one once void for any reason cannot be revived and used in any connec- tion. The same specific name cannot be used twice in the same genus. The Actual Classification of Birds has undergone radical modification of late years, though the same machinery is employed for its expression. This is as would be expected, seeing how pro- foundly the theory of Evolution has affected our principles of classi- fication, how completely the morphological has replaced other systems, and how steadilj^ our knowledge of the structure of birds, and their chronological relations, has progressed. Nevertheless, the ornithological system is still in a transition state. With this glance at some taxonomic principles and practices, I pass to an outline of the structure of birds, some knowledge of Avhich is indispensable to any appreciation of ornithological defini- tions and descriptions. It is necessary to be brief, and I shall confine myself mainly to the consideration of those points, and the explanation of those technical terms, which the student needs to understand in order to use any systematic treatise easily and successfully. § 3.— DEFINITIONS AND DESCPJPTIONS OF THE EXTEPJOR PARTS OF BIRDS a. Of the Feathers, or Plumage Feathers are possessed only by birds, and all birds possess them. Feathers are modified scales ; like scales, hair, horns, plates, sheaths, etc., they are outgrowths of the integument, or skin cover- ing the body, and therefore belong to the class of epidermic (Gr. ctt/, epi, upon ; Se/j/xa, derma, skin), or exoslxletal (Gr. e^, ex, out ; o-kcA- eroV, skeleton, dried ; in the sense of " outer skeleton ") structures. 124 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii The horny coverings of the beak and feet are of the same class, but very differently developed. Besides being the most highly developed or complexly specialised, wonderfully beautiful and per- fect kind of tegumentary outgrowths — besides fulfilling in a singular manner the design of covering and protecting the body — feathers have their particular locomotory office : that of accomplishing the act of flying in a manner peculiar to birds. For all vertebrates, ex- cepting birds, that progress through the air — the flying-fish, with its enlarged pectoral fins ; the flying-reptile, Math its skinny parachute ; the flying mammal (bat) with its great webbed fingers — accomplish aerial locomotion by means of tegumentary expansions. Birds alone fly with tegumentary outgrowths, or appendages. All a bird's feathers, of whatever kind, collectively constitute its ptilosis (Gr. TTTtAov, ptilon, a feather) or plumage (Lat. pluma, a plume). Development of Feathers. — In a manner analogous to that of hair, a feather grows in a little pit or pouch formed by inversion of the dermal or true-skin layer of the integument, being formed in a closed follicle or shut sac consisting of an inner and outer coat separated by a layer of fine granular substance. The outer layer or outer follicle is composed of several thin strata of nucleated epithelial cells (cuticle cells) ; the inner is thicker, spong}^, and filled ■with gelatinous fluid ; a little artery and vein furnish the blood circulation, very active during the formation of feathers. The inner is the true matrix or mould upon which the feather is formed, evolving from the blood-supply the gelatinous material, and resolv- ing this into cell-nuclei; the granular layer is the formative material which becomes the feather. The outer grows a little beyond the cutaneous sac that holds it, and opens at the end ; from this orifice the future feather protrudes, sprouting as a little fine- rayed pencil point. The process is thus graphically illustrated by Huxley : " The integument of birds is always provided with horny appendages, which result from the conversion into horn of the cells of the outer layer of the epidermis. But the majority of these appendages, which are termed ' feathers,' do not take the form of mere plates developed upon the surface of the skin, but are evolved within sacs from the surfaces of conical })apillc'e of the dermis. The external suiface of the dermal papilla, whence a feather is to be developed, is provided upon its dorsal [upper] surface with a median groove, which becomes shallower towards the apex of the papilla. From this median groove lateral furrows proceed at an open angle, and passing round upon the under surface of the papilla, become shallower, until, in the middle line, opposite the doi'sal median groove, they become obsolete. Minor grooves run at right angles to the lateral furrows. Hence the surface of the papilla has the character of a kind of mould, and if it were repeatedly dipped in EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS 125 such a substance as a solution of gelatine, and withdrawn to cool, until its whole surface was covered with an even coat of that sub- stance, it is clear that the gelatinous coat would be thickest at the basal or anterior end of the median groove, at the median ends of the lateral furrows, and at those ends of the minor grooves which open into them ; while it would be very thin at the apices of the median and lateral grooves, and between the ends of the minor grooves. If, therefore, the hollow cone of gelatine, removed from its mould, were stretched from within ; or if its thinnest parts be- came weak by drying \ it would tend to give way, along the inferior median line, opposite the rod-like cast of the dorsal median groove and between the ends of the casts of the lateral furrows, , <^-': : ''1 „ r as well as between each of /'"' the minor grooves, and the / hollow cone would expand into a flat, feather-like struc- ture Avith a median shaft, as a ' vane ' formed of ' barbs ' and 'barbules.' In point of fact, in the development of a feather such a cast of the dermal papilla is formed, though not in gelatine, but in the horny epidermic layer developed upon the mould, and, as this is thrust outward, it opens out in the manner just described. After a cer- tain period of growth the papilla of the feather ceases '\.'=s-r .- _^' to be grooved, and a continu- ■^-iiv-. , ^^ ous horny cylinder is formed, ^ " whiVh pon«titiifp« flip'rniill ' " Fia.l9.— A partly pennaceous, partly plumulaceous wmon OOUbUlLUUeb uue qum. feather from Ai-gus pheasant; after Nitzsch. o.d, (Introd. L'UiSSif. ^■In'uil. p. 71.) liia'H stem; d, calamus ; a, rhachls ; c, c, c, vanes, ^ ' • ' ' " ■'■ ' '' cut away on left side in order not to interfere with h, Structure or Feathers. the after-shaft, the whole of the right vane of winch A perfect feather, possessing '« "kewise cut away. all the parts it can develop, consists of a main stem, shaft or scape (Lat. scapus, a stalk ; Fig. 19, ad), and a supplementary stem or after-shaft {hyporhacMs ; Gr. viz 6, hupo, under, pdxfi, rhachis, a spine or ridge; Fig. 1 9, h), each bearing two webs or vanes (Lat. vexillum, pi, vexilla, a banner ; Fig. 1 9, c, c, c), one on either side. The whole scape is divided into two parts : one, nearest the body of the bird, the tube or barrel or " quill " proper (Lat. mlanms, a reed), Avhich is a hard, horny, hollow, and semi-transparent cylinder, containing a little pith 126 GEiVERAL ORNITHOLOG Y Fig. 20. — Two barbs, a, a, of a vane, bearing anterior, b, b, and posterior, c, barb- ules ; enlarged ; after Nitzsch. in the interior ; it bears no webs. One end of this quill tapers to be inserted into the skin ; the other jDasses, at a point marked by a little pit (Lat. umhilims, the navel) into the shaft proper or rhachis, the second part of the stem. The rhachis is a four-sided prism, squarish in transverse sec- tion, and tapers gradually to a fine point ; it is less horny than the barrel, very elastic, opaque, and pithy ; it bears the vexilla. The after- shaft, when well developed, is like a duplicate in miniature of the main feather, from the stem of which it springs, at junction of calamus with rhachis, close by the umbilicus. It is generally very small compared with the main part of the feather, though quite as large in a few kinds of birds ; it is entirely wanting in some groups of birds ; it is never develojied on the large, strong wing- and tail-feathers. The rave consists of a series of appressed, flat, narrowly linear or lance-linear laminae or j^lates, set obliquely on the rhachis bj^ their bases, diverging out from it at a varying open angle, ending in a free point ; each such narrow, acute plate is called a barb (Lat. barba, a beard ; Fig. 20, a, a). Now if these laminre or barbs simply lay alongside one another, like the leaves of a book, the feather would have no consistency ; therefore, they are connected together ; for, just as the rhachis bears its vane or series of barbs, so does each barb bear its vanes of the second order, or little vanes, called barbules (dimin. of barba; Fig. 20, b, b, c). These are to the barbs exactly what the barbs are to the shaft, and are similarly given off" from both sides of the upper edges of the barbs ; they make the vane truly a web, that is, they so connect the bai'bs together that some little force is required to pull them apart. Barbules are variously shaped, but generally flat sideways, with upper and lower border at base, rapidly tapering to a slender thready end, and are long enough to reach over several barbules of the next barb, crossing the latter obliquely. All the foregoing structures are seen by p . oi the naked eye or with a simple pocket lens, but the single barbuie, next to be described require a microscope : they are the ceis 'and hook- barblcels (another dimin. of barba), also called cilia, or |.^j*g^ . !j"f f'er lashes (Fig. 21) ; and hamuli, or booklets (Lat. hamulus, Nitzsc'ii. a little hook; Fig. 21). These are simply a sort of fringe to the barb- EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS 127 ules, just as if the lower edge of the barbules were frayed out, and only diti'er from each other in that barljicels are plain liair-like }iro- cesses, Avhile hamuli are liooked at the end ; they are not found on all feathers, nor on all parts of some feathers. Barbi- cels occur on both anterior and posterior rows of barbules, though rarely on the latter ; booklets are confined to any anterior series of barl>ules, which, as we have seen, overlie the })Osterior rows, forming a diagonal mesh-work. The design of this beautiful structure is evident; the barbules are interlocked, and the whole made a web ; for each booklet of one barbule catches hold of a barbixle from the next barb in front, any barbule thus holding on to as many of the barb- ules of the next barb as it has booklets ; while, to facilitate this interlocking, the barbules have a thickened upper edge of the right size for the hook- lets to grasp. The arrangement is shown in Fig. 22, Avhere a, a, a, a, are four barbs in transverse section, viewed from the cut surfaces, with their anterior, h, h, h, h, and posterior, c, c, c, r, barbules, the former bearing the booklets which catch over the edge of the latter. Types of Feathery Structure. — But all feathers do not answer the above description. The after-shaft may be wanting. Hooklets may not be developed, as frequently happens. Barbicels may be few or entirely want- ing. Barbules may be similarly deficient, or so defective as to be only recognised by their position and relations. Even barbs themselves may be few or lacking on one side of the shaft, or on both sides, as in certain bristly or hair-like styles of feathers. Consideration of these and other modifications of feather- Fio. 22.— Four barbs in cross section, a, a, a, a, bearing anterior, 6, b, b, h, ami posterior,c, c, c, c, barbules, the former bearing hooklets which catoh over the latter ; magni- f i e (1 ; after Nitzscli. Fig. 23 -A feather from the tail of a kingbird, Tyrannus mroKiiensis, almost entirely pennaceous ; no after-shaft. From nature, by Coues. structure has led me to the recognition of three types or plans : 1. The perfectly feathery, ])Jmiious, or pennaceous (Lat. j^hona, a plume, Qv penna, a feather fit for writing with ; Fig. 23), as above described. 2. The downy or jylumidaceous {Lat. pluvnila, a little plume, a down- feather), when the stem is short and weak, with soft rhachis and barbs, with long slender thready barbules, little knotty dilatations in 128 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii place of barbicels, and no booklets. 3. The hairy, bristly, oxfiloplum- aceous (Lat. filum, a thread), with a very long, slender stem, and rudi- mentary or very small vanes composed of fine cylindrical barbs and Ijarbules, if any, and no barbicels, knots, or booklets. There is no abrupt definition between these types of stiucture ; in fact, the same feather may be constructed on more than one of these plans, as in Fig. 19, which is partly pennaceovis, partly plumulaceous. All feathers are built upon one or another, or some combination, or modification, of these types ; and, in all their endless diversity, may be reduced to four or five Different Kinds of Feathers. — 1. Confoiir -feathers, 2^Gn7iee or phimxe. proper, have a perfect stem composed of calamus and rhachis, with vanes of pennaceous structure, at least in part, usually plumu- laceous toward the base. These form the great bulk of the surface- plumage exposed to light ; their beautiful tints give the bird's colours; they are the most modified in detail of all, from the fish-like scales of a penguin's wings to the glittering jewels of the humming- bird, and the endless array of the tufts, crests, ruflfs, and other ornaments of the feathered tribes ; even the imperfect bristle-like feathers above mentioned may belong among them. Another feature is, that they are usually individually moved by subcutaneous muscles, of which there may be several to one feather, passing to be attached to the sheath of the tube, inside the skin, in which the stem is inserted. These muscles may be plainly seen under the skin of a goose, and every one has observed their operation when a hen shakes herself after a sand-bath, or any bird erects its top-knot. 2. Down-feathers, plumidce, are characterised by a downy structure throughout. They more or less completely invest the body, but are almost always hidden beneath the contour-feathers, like pad- ding about the bases of the latter ; occasionally they come to light, as in the fleecy ruff about the neck of the condor, and then usually replace contour-feathers ; they have an after-shaft, or none ; and sometimes no rhachis at all, the barbs tlien being sessile in a tuft at the end of the ciuill. They often stand in a regular quin- cunx (' • ) between four contour-feathers. 3. Semiplumes, semi- plunicc, may be said to unite the characters of the last tAvo, possess- ing the pennaceous stem of the former, and the plumulaceous vanes of the latter ; they are with or without after-shaft. They stand among pennte, as the plumulie do, about the edges of patches of the former, or in parcels by themselves, but are always covered by contour-feathers. 4. Filoplumes, filoplumce, or thread-feathers, have an extremely slender, almost invisible stem, not well distinguished into barrel and shaft, and usually no vane, unless a terminal tuft of barbs may be held for such. Long as they are, they are usually hidden by the contour-feathers, close to which they stand as access- EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS 129 ories, one or more seeming to issue out of the very sacs in which the larger feathers are impkmted. These are the nearest approach to hairs that birds have ; they are very well shown on domestic poultry, being what a good cook finds it necessary to singe off after plucking a fowl for the table. 5. Certain down-feathers are remark- able for continuing to grow indefinitely, and with this unlimited growth is associated a continual breaking down of the ends of the barbs. Such pluraulse, from being always dusted over with dry, scurfy exfoliation, are called powder-down ; they may be entitled to rank as a fifth kind. I call them pidviphmies. They occur in the hawk, parrot, and gallinaceous tribes, and especially in the herons and their allies. They are always present in the latter, where they may be readily seen as at least two Large patches of greasy or dusty, whitish feathers, matted over the hips and on the breast. Feather Oil Gland. — Birds do not perspire, and cutaneous glands, corresponding to the sweat-glands and sebaceous follicles so common in Manniialia, are little known among them. But their " oil-can " is a kind of sebaceous follicle, which may be noticed here in connec- tion with other tegumentary apijendages. This is a two-lobed or rather heart-shaped gland, saddled upon the "pope's-nose," at the root of the tail, and hence sometimes called the uropygial gland (Lat. uropygium, rump), or rump-gland. I have named it the elceo- doclion ( Gr. lAatoSo^^o?, ekiiodochos, containing oil ; Fig. 2-i, 9). It is composed of numerous slender tubes or follicles which secrete the greasy fluid, the ducts of which, uniting successively in larger tubes, finally open by one or more pores, commonly upon a little nipple- like elevation. Birds press out a drop of oil with the beak and dress the feathers with it, in the well-known operation called " preening." The gland is large and always present in aquatic birds, which have need of waterproof plumage ; smaller in land- birds, as a rule, and wanting in some. The presence or absence of this singular structure, and whether or not it is surmounted by a particular circlet of feathers, distinguishes certain groups of birds, and has come to be much used in classification. Pterylography.— Feathered Tracts and Unfeathered Spaces. — Excepting certain birds having obviously naked spaces, as about the head or feet, all would be taken to be fully feathered. So the}^ are covered with feathers, but it does not follow that feathers are every- where implanted upon the skin. On the contrary, a uniform and continuous pterylosis is the rarest of all kinds of feathering ; though such occurs, almost or quite perfectly, among certain birds, as the ostrich tribe, i)enguins, and toucans. If Ave compare a bird's skin to a well-kept park, part Avoodland, part lawn ; then where feathers grow is the woodland, where they do not grow is the lawn. The former places are called tracts or pAerijIcc (Gi-. -Tepov, pteron, a plume K 130 GENERA L ORNl THOL OGY and {'A?;, hylt, a wood) ; the latter, spaces or apteria (Gr. a privative, and TTTipov) ; they mutually distinguish certain definite areas. Not only are the lAeryla' and apiena thus definite, but their size, form, and arrangement mark whole families and even orders of birds ; so that pterylosis, or the formation of the feather-tracts, becomes avail- able, and is indeed found to be important, for purposes of classifi- cation. Fterylographi/, or the description of this matter, has been made a special study by the celebrated Nitzsch, avIio has laid down the general plan of pterylosis which obtains in the great majority of birds, as follows : 1. The spinal or dorsal tract (pteri/Ia spinalis ; Fig. 24, 1), running along the middle of the bird above from the nape of the neck to the tail ; subject to great variation in width, to dilation and contraction, to forking, to sending out branches, to inter- rujition, etc. 2. The humeral tracts (7?/. Jmmeralis ; Lat. humerus. Fio. 24. — Pterylosis of Cupselus apns, drawn by Cones after Nitzsrh ; right hand upper, left hand lower, surface. 1, spinal tract ; 2, humeral ; 3, femoral ; 4, capital ; 5, alar ; 6, caudal; 7, crural ; 8, ventral ; 9, elaeodochon ; 10, anus. the shoulder, or upper-arm bone ; Fig. 24, 2), always present, one on each wing ; they are narrow bands, running from the shoulder obliquely backward upon the upper-arm bone, parallel with the shoulder-blade. 3. The femoral tracts (])(.. femorales ; Lat. femur, the thigh ; Fig. 24, 3) : a similar oblique band upon the outside of each thigh, but subject to great variation. 4. The ventral tract {pt. ventralis ; Lat. venter, the belly ; Fig. 24, 8), Avhich forms most of the plumage on the under part of a bird, commencing at or near the throat, and continued to the vent ; like the dorsal tract, it is very variable, is usually bifurcate, or forked into right or left halves, with a median apterium, is broad or narrow, branched, etc.; thus, Nitzsch enumerates seventeen distinct modifications. The foregoing are mostly isolated tracts, that is, bands nearly surrounded by complementary apteria ; the following are, in general, continu- ously and uniformly feathered, and thus practically equivalent to SEC. Ill EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS 131 the part of the body they represent : Thus, 5, the head tract {pt. capitidis ; Lat. caput, capitis, head; Fig. 24, 4) clothes the head, and generally runs into the beginning of both dorsal and ventral tracts. 6. The wing tract {pt. alaris ; Lat. ala, wing ; Fig. 24, 5) repre- sents all the feathers that grow upon the wing, excepting those of the humeral tract. 7. The tail tract {pt. ccmdalis ; Lat. Cauda, tail ; Fig. 24, G) includes the tail-feathers proper and their coverts, and those about the elajodochon, and usually receives the termination of the dorsal, ventral, and femoral tracts. 8. The leg tract {p)t. cruralis ; Lat. cms, cruris, leg; Fig. 24, 7) clothes the legs as far as these are feathered, which is generally to the heel, always below the knee, and sometimes to the toes or even the claws. — I need not enumerate the apteria, as these are merely the complements of the pterylae. The highly important special " flight-feathers " of the wings and " rudder-feathers " of the tail are to be examined beyond, in describing those members. Endysis and Eedysis. — Putting- on and off Plumage. — Newly hatched birds are covered for some time with a kind of dow^i, entirely different from such feathers as they ultimately acquire. It is scant}^, leaving much or all of the body naked, in most altricial birds, such as are reared by the parents in the nest (Lat. altrir, female nourisher) ; but thick and puffy in some Altrices, and in all Frcecoces (Lat. proicox, precocious) which run about at birth. Since many birds which require to be reared in the nest are also hatched clothed, or very speedily become downy, a more exact distinction may be drawn by using the terms ptilopcedic and psilopa^dic (Gr. ■KTiXov, ptilon, a feather ; xpiXo^, p)silos, bare ; and Trats, pais, a child) respectively for those birds which are hatched feathered or naked — a chicken and a canary-bird are familiar examples. It is the rule that the higher birds are born helpless and naked, requiring to be reared in the nest till their feathers grow ; the reverse with lower birds, as the walking, wading, and swimming kinds. It offers, however, many exceptions ; thus, no birds are more naked and helpless at birth than young cormorants. Prol^ably all prre- cocial birds are also ptilopsedic, and all psilopaidic birds altricial ; but the converse is far from holding good, many Altrices, as hawks and owls, being also ptilopsedic. In other words, jisilopsedic birds are always altricial, but ptilopajdic birds may be either altricial or prsecocial. In any case, true feathers are soon gained, in some days or Aveeks — those of the wings and tail being usually the first to sprout. The acquisition of plumage is called endijsis (Gr. eVSrcrt^, endusis, putting on). The renewal of plumage is a process familiar to all, in its generalities, under the term " moult," or eedysis (Gr. eKSvcn^, ekdusis, putting off). Feathers are of such rapid growth, and make such a drain upon the Adtal energies, that we easily understand how 132 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii critical are periods of the change. The first ph;niage is usually worn but a short time ; then another more or less complete change commonly occurs. The moult is as a rule annual ; and in many cases more than one moult is required before the bird attains the perfection of maturity in its feathering. It is well known how different many birds are the first year in their coloration from that afterward acquired. Sometimes changes progress for several years ; and some birds appear to have a period of senile decline. All such changes are necessarily connected, if not with actual moult, as is the rule, then at any rate Avith wear and tear and repair of the plumage. The first plumage being gained, under whatever conditions peculiar to the species, it is the general rule that birds are subject to single or annual moult. This commonly occurs in the fall, when the duties of incubation are concluded, and the well-worn plumage most needs renewal. Many, however, moult tAvice a year, the additional moult usually occurring in the spring- time, when a fresh nuptial suit is acquired ; in such cases the moult is said to be double or setni-annual. Such additional moult is generally incomplete ; that is, all the feathers are not shed and re- newed, but more or fewer new ones are gained, with more or less loss of the old ones, if any. The most striking ornaments donned for the breeding season, as the elegant plumes of many herons, are usually worn but a brief time, being doffed in advance of the general fall moult. A few birds, as the ptarmigan {Lagoims), regularly have even a third or triple moult, shedding many of their feathers as usual in the early autumn, then changing entirely to pure white for the winter, then in spring moulting completely to assume their wedding-dress. As a rule, feathers are moulted so gradually, particularly those of the wings and tail, and so simultane- ously upon right and left sides of the body, that birds are at no time deprived of the power of flight. The first flight -feathers acquired by young birds are usually kept till the next season ; but in those that fly very early, before they are half-grown, as so many gallinaceous birds do, their first weak Aving-feathers are included in the general moult Avhich occurs to young and old in the fall. The duck tribe offer the remarkable case that they drop their wing- quills so nearly all at once as to be for some time deprived of the power of flight. It is quite certain that inany birds change the colours of their plumage remarkably, without losing or gaining any feathers, by some process which affects the texture of the feathers, such as the shedding of the barbicels and booklets, or its pigmenta- tion, or by such processes combined. The male bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) changes from the buff' dress of the female to his rich black suit without losing or gaining any feathers, a process which is called ,aptosochromatisni. It is difficult to lay down any rules of moulting SEC. Ill EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS 133 for particular groups of birds, since birds very closely related differ greatly in resj^ect to their changes of plumage ; and the subject has not yet received the attention its interest and importance should claim for it. The physiological processes involved are analogous to those concerned in the shedding of the hair of mammals and the casting of the cuticle of reptiles. Plumag-e-ehanges with Sex, Age, and Season. — Aside from any consideration of the way in which plumage changes, whether by moult or otherwise, the fact remains that most birds of the same species diifer more or less from one another according to certain circumstances. The dissimilarity is not only in coloration, though this is the usual and most pronounced difference, but also in the degree of the development of plumes — their size, form, and texture. Since young birds are those which have not come to sexual vigour ; since breeding recurs at regular periods of the year ; and since males and females usually differ in plumage, nearly all the various dresses worn by different individuals of the same species are cor- related with the conditions of the reproductive system. As the internal generative organs represent of course the essential or jjrimari) sexual characters, all those features of the plumage just indicated may be properly classed as secondary sexual characters. These are of great importance, not only in practical ornithology, but as the basis of some of the soundest views that have been advanced respecting the evolution of specific characters in this class of animals. The generalisations may be made : that when the sexes are strikingly different in plumage, the young at first resemble the female ; when the adults are alike, the young are different from either ; when seasonal changes are great, the young resemble the fall plumage of the parents ; and further, that when the adults of two related species of the same genus are nearly alike, the young are usually intermediate, their specific characters not being fully developed. Specific characters are often to be found only in the male, the females of two related species being scarcely distinguish- able, though the males may be told apart at a glance. Extraordinary developments of feathers, as to size, shape, and colour, are often confined to one sex, usually the male. The more richly, exten- sively, or peculiarly the male is adorned, the simpler the female in comparison, as the peacock and peahen. Darwin has formulated the several categories of secondary sexual characters, giving the following rules or classes of cases : " 1. When the adult male is more beautiful or conspicuous than the adult female, the young of both sexes in their first jDlumage closely resemble the adult female, as -with the common fowl and peacock, or, as occasionally occurs, they resemble her much more closely than they do the adult male. 2, When the adult female is more conspicuous than the adult male. 134 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii as sometimes, though rarely, occurs [chiefly with certain birds of prey and snipe-like birds], the young of both sexes in their first plumage resemble the adult male. 3. When the adult male resembles the adult female, the young of both sexes have a peculiar first plumage of their own, as with the robin [usual]. 4. When the adult male resembles the adult female, the young of both sexes in their first plumage resemble the adults [unusual]. 5. When the adults of both sexes have a distinct winter and summer plumage, whether or not the male differs from the female, the young resemble the adults of both sexes in their winter dress, or much more rarely in their summer dress, or they resemble the females alone. Or the young may have an intermediate character; or again, they may differ greatly from the adults in both their seasonal plumages. 6. In some few cases the young in their first plumage differ from each other according to sex ; the young males resembling more or less closely the adult males, and the young females more or less closely the adult females."— (Z'^'.sc. of Man, ed. 1881, p. 466.) h. The Topography of Birds. The Contoup of a Bird with the feathers on is spindle-shaped or fusiform (Lat. fnnKs, a spindle), tapering at both ends ; it represents two cones joined base to base at the middle or greatest girth of the body, tapering in front to the tip of the bill, behind to the end of the tail. The obvious design is easiest cleavage of air in front, and least drag or wash behind, in the act of flying. This shape is largely produced by the lay of the plumage ; a naked bird presents several prominences and depressions, this irregular contour being reducible, in general terms, to two spindles or double cones. The head tapers to a point in front, at the tip of the bill, and contracts behind, toward the middle of the neck, in consequence of diminution in bulk of the muscles by which it is slung on the neck; which last is somewhat contracted or hour-glass-shaped near the middle, swelling where it is slung to the body. The body is largest in front and tapers to the tail. The Centre of Gravity is admirably preserved beneath the centre of the body, and opposite the points where it is supported by the wings. The enormous breast - muscles of a bird are among its heaviest parts, sometimes weighing, to speak roundly, as much as one-sixth of the whole bird. Now these are they that effect all the movements of the wings at the shoulder- joints, lifting as well as lowering the wings. Did these pectoral muscles pull straight, the lifters of the wing would have to be above the shoulder-joint ; but they all lie below it, and the lifters accomplish their office by running through pulleys to change the line of their traction. They SEC. Ill EXTERIOR PARTS OF BIRDS 135 work like men hoisting sails from the deck of a vessel ; and thus, like a ship's cargo, a bird's chief weight is kept below the centre of motion. Top-heaviness is further oljviated by the way in which birds with a long heavy neck and head draw these jjarts in upon the breast, and extend the legs behind, as is well shown by the attitude of a heron flying. The nice adjustment of balance by the variable extension of the head and feet is exactly like that produced in weighing by shifting a weight along the arm of a steelyard ; and together with the slinging of the chief weight under the wings instead of over or even between them, enables a bird to easily keep right side up in flight. The Exterior of a Bird is divided for purposes of description into acmn parts: — 1. The head (Lat. caput); 2. The neck (Lat. collmn) ; 3. The body proper, or trunk (Lat. tmncus) ; 4. The bill or beak (Lat. rostrum) ; 5. The wings (Lat. pi. alee) ; 6. The tail (Lat. cauda); 7. The feet (Lat. pi. pedca). Of these, 1, 2, 3, the head, neck, and trunk, are collectively termed the body (Lat. corpus), in distinction from 4, 5, 6, 7, which are the members (Lat. pi. membra). The wings and feet are of course double or paired parts. The bill is strictly but a part of the head ; but its manifold uses as an organ of prehension make it functionally a hand, and therefore one of the "members." The Head has the general shape of a four-sided pyramid ; of which the base is applied to the end of the neck, therefore not appearing from the exterior, and the apex of which is frustrated at the base of the bill. The uppermost side is more or less convex or vaulted, sloping in every direction ; the under side is flattish and horizontal ; the lateral surfaces are flattish and vertical ; all similarly taper forward. The departures from any such typical shape are endless in degree and variable in kind, giving rise to numerous general descriptive terms, such as "head flattened," "head globular," but not susceptible of exact definition. The head is moulded, of course, upon the skull, corresponding in a general way to the brain-cavity of the cranium proper, both in size and sliaj^e ; but it difters in several particulars. Li the first place, there is the scaftblding of the jaws ; secondly, large excavations to receive the eyeballs, and smaller ones for the ear-parts ; thirdly, muscular masses overlying the bone ; and lastly, in some birds, large hollow spaces in the bone between the inner and outer tables or plates of the cranial walls. Each side of the head presents two openings for the ei/e (Lat. ocnius) and ear (Lat. auris), the position of which is variable, both absolutely and in relation to each other. But in the vast majority of l)irds, the eye is strictly lateral in situation, and near the middle of the side of the head ; while the ear is behind and a little below the eye, near the articulation of the lower jaw. But the shape of the 136 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii skull of owls is such, that the eyes are directed forward, and such birds are said to have "eyes anterior." Owls also have enormous outer ears, in some cases provided with a movable flap or conch, closing upon the opening like the lid of a box ; in many cases the ear-parts, and some of the cranium itself, being unsymmetrical. In most birds the ear-opening is quite small, and only covered by modified feathers, the ear-coverts or atiriculars. In the woodcock and snipe, owing to the way the brain-box is tilted up, the ears are below and not behind the eyes. The mouth (Lat. os, gen. oris) is always a fissure across the front of the head. The cleavage varies, both in extent and direction ; the latter is usually horizontal, or nearly so, but may trend much downward ; the former varies from a minimum, in which the cleft does not reach back of the horny part of the bill, as in a snipe, to the maximum seen in fissure-billed birds like the swifts and goatsuckers, which gape almost from ear to ear. There are no other openings in the head proper, for the nostrils are always in the bill. The Neck, in effect, is a simple cylinder, rendered somewhat hour- glass-shaped, as above said. It consists of a movable chain of bones, the cervical vertehrce (Lat, cervix, the neck ; verto, I turn) enveloped in muscle, along which in front lie the gullet (Lat. cesophagus) and windpipe (Lat. trachea), with associate blood-vessels, nerves, etc. Its length is very variable, as is the number of its bones, the latter ranging from 8 to about 26. Bearing as it does the head, with the hill, which is the true hand of a bird, the neck is extremely flexible, to permit the necessarily varied movements of this handy member. Its least length may be said to be that which allows the point of a bird's beak to reach the oil-gland on the rump ; its greatest length sometimes exceeds that of the body and tail together, as in the case of a swan, crane, or heron. The length is usually in direct proportion to that of the legs, in obvious design of allowing the beak to touch the ground easily to pick up food. The neck is habitually carried in a double curve, like an open S or italic /, the lower l)elly of the curve, convex forward, fitting in between the forks of the merrythought (Lat. furculmn), the upper curve holding the head horizontal at the same time. This " sigmoid flexure " (sigma, Greek S), highly characteristic of the bird's neck, is produced by the saddle-shaping of the articular surfaces of the several bones. The mechanical arrangement is such, that the sigma may be easily bent till the upper end (head) rests on the lower convexity, or as easily straightened to a right line ; but little if any further deviation in opposite curvature is permitted. As a generalisation, the neck may be called relatively longest in wading birds, as herons, cranes, ibises, etc. ; shortest in perching birds, as the great majority of small Passeres ; intermediate in SEC. Ill EXTERIOR PARTS OE BIRDS 137 swimming birds. But many swimmers, as swans and cormorants, have extremely long necks ; and some waders, as plovers, have very short ones. A long neck is a rarity among the higher birds (above the Gallince), in most of which the head seems to nestle upon the shoulders. The longer the neck, the more sinuous and flexible is it likely to be. Anatomically, the neck ends in front at the articulation of the atlas (first cervical vei'tebra) with the skull, and behind at the first vertebra which bears free jointed ribs reaching the sternum. (See also ^^ 4, AiHitoiiiy.) The shape of the Body proper, or Trunk, is obviously referable to that of the egg ; it is ovate (Lat. ovum, an egg ; whence oiril, the plane figure represented by the middle lengthwise section of an egg ; ovate or ovoid, the solid figui'e). The swelling of the breast i-epresents the greatest diameter of the egg, usually near the larger end. But the ovoid is never perfectly expressed, and departures from the figure are numberless. In general, the higher perching birds have the body nearly of the ovate shape ; among waders, the figure is usually compressed, or flattened vertically, as is well seen in the herons, and still better in the rails, where the lateral narrowing is at an extreme; among swimmers, the body is always more or less depressed, or flattened horizontally, and especially underneath, that the birds may rest on the water with more stability, as well shown by a duck or diver. Anatomically the body begins with the foremost dorsal or thoracic vertebra', or those that bear true ribs ; laterally, it ceases quite definitely at the shoulder-joints, the whole of the fore limb being outside the general content of the trunk ; behind, in the middle line, it includes everything, only the iixil-feathcrs themselves being beyond it ; behind and laterally, it includes more or less of the legs, for these are generally buried in the common integument of the body to the knee-joint, nearly or quite so, and sometimes to the heel-joint ; though in anatomical strictness the trunk should be limited by the hip-joint. The rib-bearing part of the back-bone, the ribs themselves, and the greatly enlarged breast-bone (Lat. stermim) compose the walls of the chest (Lat. thorax). Upon this bony box, Avhich contains the heart and lungs and some other viscera, are saddled on each side the bones of the shoulder-girdle or scapidar arch, namely, the shoulder-blades (Lat. scajndce), the coracoids, and the collar-bones (Lat. clavicula:), all three of which, on each side, come together at the shoulder-joint (Figs. 1, 2). The thoracic cavity is not separated by any partition or diaphragm from that of the belly (Lat. abdomen), which with the pelvis, or basin, contains the digestive, urinary, and genital organs. The pelvis is composed, in dorsal mid-line, of so many of the vertebra? {d.orsodund>ar, sacral proper, and urosacral), as become immovably joined to one another, and later- ally of the confluent haunch - bones. The numerous anchylosed 138 GENERAL ORNITHOLOGY part ii (or confluent) vertebrae compose the sacrum. The haunch-bones or ossa innominata consist on each side of three bones, iUwn, ischium, and pubis, in adult life more or less perfectly anchylosed. Where they all three come together is the hip-joint. The remaining bones, usually included among those of the body proper, are the coccygeal or caudal vertebra?. (For anatomical details see beyond, under Osteology, etc.) Topography of the Body. — Besides being thus divided into head, neck, trunk, and members, the exterior of the body is further subdivided or mapped out into regions for the purposes of description. It is necessary for the student to become familiar with the " topo- graphy " of a bird, as this kind of mapping out may be called, for the names of the regions or outer areas are incessantly used in ordinary descriptive ornithology. Many more names have been applied than are in common use ; I shall try to define and explain all those which are usually employed, beginning with the parts of the hody, and ending with those of the members. 1. Regions of the Body. Upper and Under Parts. — Draw a line from the corner of the mouth along the side of the head and neck to and through the shoulder-joint and thence along the side of the body to the root of the tail ; all above this line, including the upper surfaces of the wings and tail, are upper parts; all below it, including under surfaces of wings and tail, are imder parts ; for which the short words "above" and "below" often stand. The distinction is purely arbitrary, but so convenient as to be practically indispens- able. It will be seen how an otherwise lengthy description, enumerating parts that lie over or under the " lateral line," can be put in so few words as, for example, "above, green ; below, yellow." Many birds' colours have some such simple general distribution. These parts are also the dorsal (Lat. dorsum, back) and ventral (Lat. venter, belly) surfaces or aspects. The uj^per parts of the body l^roper, or trunk, have also received the general name of notceum (Gr. viiiTo