C'liiisl cheers the Prospect Hi J arms o^'merci/ are expanded to receive th*' comi/i^ .u>ui . Fear net poer Strmer, Uj upprearAHmr, TTev/tU ru't. on fzru/ iK.-omtt. ■ ast /Jtee oi/f . Pa^e 12.9. HELP TO ZION'S TRAVELLERS: BEING AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE VARIOUS STUMBLING-BLOCKS OUT OF THE WAY RELATING TO DOCTRINAL, EXPERIMENTAL AND PRACTICAL RELIGION. BY ROBERT HALL, Late of Arnshy. ILLUSTRATED WITH NOTES, BY REV. JOSEPH A. WARNE, OF BROOKLINE, MASS. A Recommendatory Preface hy Dr. Ryland, AND AN INTRODUCTORY PREFACE BY THE LATE ROBERT HALL, A. M. OF BRISTOL, ENG. TO WHICH IS ADDED THE AUTHOR'S LIFE. BOSTON: LINCOLN, EDMANDS AND CO. 1833. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1833, BY LINCOLN, EDMANDS & CO. in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Massachusetts. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE READER. The substance of the following attempt to relieve dis- couraged Christians, was delivered in a sermon at an Annual Association, held at Northampton, May 26, 1779, and was by the ministers and messengers of the churches desired to be printed. But most of the said ministers, and many of my friends, apprehending afterwards that the great variety and vast importance of the subjects at- tended to, would not admit of their being properly treated in so small a compass as that of a sermon, they requested that the plan might be enlarged, and the ideas expanded ; and advised to print it by subscription. This proposal I could not immediately comply with, as it materially differed from, and greatly exceeded, what was at first desired ; and therefore 1 resolved not to publish in any form, till the sense of the associate brethren could be taken. Accordingly, at their next annual meet- ing, I gave my reasons why I had not complied with their request; of which they approved, and earnestly desired the last-mentioned plan might be adopted and pursued. I should not perhaps have mentioned the above, only for the satisfaction of those who have complained of the long delay. Being in a state of entire suspense for one year, and waiting to collect the names of subscribers afterwards, were the chief, though not the only reasons of the publication being postponed ; for various provi- dential occurrences have contributed to the delay. Respecting what 1 have written. 1 have only to say, the establishment of truth, the relief of distressed souls, iv the increase of brotherly love among the godly of every denomination, delight in the adorable and boundless per- fections of the great Jehovah, Father, Son, and Spirit, and conformity to his righteous will, are the ends 1 have had in view, and which I earnestly wish may be accom- plished. But whether the manner of treating the several subjects be calculated to answer such purposes, 1 cannot say. I am habitually afraid, lest truth should suffer through my weakness, and on that account have often repented that I complied with the request of my friends^ However, having been greatly perplexed with most of the difficulties referred to, I am not without hope that the communication of what has been relieving to my own mind, may be of use to others in similar exercises, through the blessing of God, which it is earnestly desired may attend every reader. And for which end may each one endeavor to lift up his heart unto him who hath said, I The meek he will guide in judgment, and teach his way. Finally, brethren, pray for me, that I may live under the influence of truth, and in the prospect of eternal glory r ROBERT HALL, Arnsby, Leicestershire ^ May 21, 178L EDITOR'S PREFACE. The work of which a new edition is now offered to the public, stands in no need of a recommendation from the pen of any man living. It has been its own recommen- dation to the religious world in Great Britain, and also in America ; and never did we meet with a serious Christian who had read it, who did not award to it the meed of his hearty praise. It has been long, it is be- lieved, out of print in this country; and during the time that it has been so, a state of the religious com- munity has arisen, which has rendered such a Manual exceedingly desirable; and, indeed, the absence of such a one, much to be deplored. The few last years have been remarkable for exten- sive revivals of religion in almost every section of our country ; and for very numerous additions made to the numbers of professing Christians. The judicious and observing, however, cannot but have lamented, that while great pains, and unexampled labors have been bestowed, by ministers, on the unconverted, to snatch them from the burning, correspondent attention has not been bestowed on the young convert, to indoctrinate him in the truth. This has been a necessary conse- quence of the limitation of man's physical powers. ^11 the strength of multitudes of ministers, has been spent on the endeavor to awaken sinners ; andimnra4han all, (jll iniiilMiiiiniiii f iiriiiiiii of course, the instruction of the converted, " more perfectly in the way of God," has been partially overlooked. One object of the present volume is, to supply this deficiency ; by enabling the young Christian, for himself, to acquire that acquaintance with some of the doctrines of the religion of Christ, which, while they lie at the foundation of hnnaan hope, are yet apt to present difficulties in the way of " Zion's Trav- ellers." Of his own work, the Editor may be permitted to say, that he has been careful, in reducing the treatise to chapters, &c. not to destroy the integrity of Mr. Hall's work ; and if, in a very few instances, he has made a slight alteration in the collocation of words, he trusts he shall meet with indulgence ; as it has been done only to avoid the introduction of some compound words, which the taste of modern readers cannot approve ; such as '' Christ-dishonoring," and one or two others. Of the Notes, he has only to say, that they were de- signed for the elucidation of the text itself, or of the doctrine of the text ; and, if he may rely on the judg- ment of friends, to whose examination they have been subjected, they will be found not altogether without utilit)^ With these remarks and explanations, the work is committed to the favor of the public, and the blessing of God, by the EDITOR. Brookline, {Mass.) Dec. 1833. Recommendatory preface TO THE SECOND LONDON EDITION. Twenty-eight years have elapsed since that Sermon was delivered, in my father's pulpit, at Northampton, before the Baptist Association, which Mr. Hall after- wards enlarged into the following Treatise. As I then united with many others in earnestly soliciting its pub- lication, so I have since repeatedly perused it with much satisfaction. When, therefore, the Publisher of the present Edition applied to me for a recommendatory Preface, I felt no hesitation but what arose from the early impressions of veneration for one of the wisest and best of men, to whom I was habituated to look up with such respect, as made this office feel to me assum- ing and arrogant. But when I reflect that he has been removed from our world for more than sixteen years, (and verily I miss no man more !) and consider that, smce his decease, many have joined our churches, who never had opportunity duly to appreciate his worth ; it seems not to be taking too much upon me, to testify in what high estimation he was justly held by those who had the pleasure of his acquaintance. Strong natural powers, ardent piety, deep exercises of mind, a series of singular and sanctified trials, with a special unction from the Holy One, rendered him a man of quick understand ing in the fear of the Lord. Deeply convinced of human guilt and depravity, and very zealous for the honor of sovereign grace ; but no less concerned for internal holiness and practical re- ligion ; he was careful to walk in the midst of the paths of judgment, and to beware of turning aside to the right hand or the left. Open to conviction, and willing to follow the light of revelation, let it lead him whithersoever it would, he believed that, about fourteen years before his death, he had formed a more excellent way of solving some theo- logical difficulties, than he had adopted in the earlier part of his ministry. He called no man upon earth master, in respect of his religious sentiments, but he took a peculiar delight in the writings of President Edwards ; and two Sermons by Mr. Smalley, (which I borrowed of our venerable friend Mr. JVeivton, of Olney, and after transcribing them, lent them to Mr. Hall,) contributed much to strengthen his conviction, that the moral impotence of sinners is no more an excuse for their slighting the call of the gospel, than it is for their violating the commands of the law. As the greatest disinclination to regard Divine authority cannot release a rational creature from an obligation to obey God's precepts ; so the utter aver- sion of a sinner to regard the kindness of God our Saviour, cannot release him from an obligation thank- fully to comply with his invitations. At the same time, Mr. Hall remained as strenuous an advocate as ever for the necessity and efficacy of divine influence, to induce sinners or saints to comply cordially with their indispensable duty ; and he was the more abundantly confirmed in a belief of the sovereign free- ness of grace, by reflecting that the inexcusable per- IX verseness of the human heart, which renders the agency of the divine Spirit so necessary, must at the sEime time evince that we are utterly unworthy of his gracious in- terposition. The greater our reluctance is to come unto God, in the way which he has prescribed for our return, the more undeserving are we of being drawn unto him by his Holy Spirit. But this excellent man remarked, that if the invitations of the gospel are not indefinite, or addressed to sinners considered simply as needy and guilty, there can be no foundation for the^ir*^ act of faith ; the sinner can have no warrant for his application to Christ, unless he could know his election, or prove his regeneration, before he committed his soul to him. Hence, as he once observed in a letter to a friend, they who would restrict the call of the gospel, "ought in reason to point out how unbe- lievers may know their election or regeneration in order to warrant their first application to Christ ; or how the assurance of personal interest in Christ may be obtained, before persons come to him. The first acts of faith must be unwarrantable and presumptuous, if there be no pre- vious call or invitation. We allow a change of heart must precede faith, but unknown renovation cannot be the ground of the sinner's first encouragement to apply to the Saviour, or that on which his right to confide in him is founded, because it is unknown. And to suppose any knowledge of regeneration or a change of heart, in order to a reliance on Jesus, is the same as supposing an assurance of possessing the spirit and grace of God, while an unbeliever ; or that a man niust know he is really safe, before he flee from danger." This little volume, however, is far from being confined to a subject on which Mr. Hall, in his latter years. thought differently from the opinion he had embraced at his first setting out in the ministry. It contains an able vindication of the genuine doctrines of grace, from the objections of Socinians, Sabellians, Arminians and Anti- nomians. At its first publication, it was much approved by many pious, judicious, and learned men, of different denominations; and here that excellent man, who is now laboring in India, with such indefatigable zeal for the salvation of the heathen, first found his own system of divinity. Raised from the greatest obscurity, Mr. Care]) had but little access to books, at his first setting out in religion ; and perplexed between the statements of the Arminians, and the crudest representations of Calvinism, by persons bordering closely on Antinornian- ism, he searched the Scriptures attentively for himself, endeavoring to find out the narrow way, between ex- tremes which seemed irreconcilable to the honor of the divine government, and the glory of divine grace : and this was the first summary of evangelical truth, which appeared to him fully to accord with the sacred standard. On one particular which many readers might expect Mr. Hall to have noticed, he has hardly touched viz. the denial of the law of God as a rule of conduct to be- lievers. This sentiment he ever considered as so gross a piece of Antinomianism, that he did not suppose any man could embrace it, whose conscience was not seared as with a hot iron. The eminent divines, who verged to an extreme respecting the obligation of sinners to repent and believe the gospel, would have reprobated this doc- trine, as tending to the greatest licentiousness. Dr. Gill, Mr. Brine, Mr. Toplady, &c. utterly condemned so vile a sentiment. But within the last twenty years how many who exclaimed against Mr, Hall and his XI brethren, for embracing new sentiments respecting the duty of sinners, have readily departed from their former guides, and embraced new notions respecting the duty of believers .' To nie it appears a most marvellous instance of the deceitfuiness of sin, if any man can think himself a friend to evangelical religion, who by sinking unbelievers below all obligation, and raising believers above all obli- gation, almost annihilates both duty and sin, and so leaves no room for the exercise of either pardoning mercy or sanctifying grace. The apostolic axiom," where there is no law there is no transgression," justly leads us to conclude, that they who are below or above law have no guilt, and need no Saviour; there is no room to show the riches of his grace, or the efficacy of his blood, in the pardon of those who never deserved punishment. If the command be exceedingly narrow, our sins must be very few, and the pardon of them a small matter. And if the effectual ivfluence of the Spirit be supposed to be the source, rule, ftnd measure of Obligation, no one can have reason to mourn for sin : since he always does as much as he was powerfully inclined to do, and by this supposition it was not his duty to do any more. Thus sinless per- fection is easily attained, though in the backward way; not by coming up to the standard of rectitude, but by bringing it down to our level. Most comfortable doctrine to a carnal heart ! The first edition of this excellent work was very in- correctly printed. This will, I trust, be found very much improved, by the care of my respected brother, the Editor, who is endeared to me by the friendship of forty years, (for it is very near so long since we were baptized together at Northampton,) and by many cor- rections made by the Author himself, as well as by the addition of a clear analysis. May God bless the re- printing of it, to lead many more fully into the truth as it is in Christ Jesus, is the earnest prayer of The reader's cordial friend, and servant, for Christ's sake, JOHN RYLAND. INTRODUCTORY PREFACE TO THE THIRD LONDON EDITION. An aversion to religious controversy may arise from two causes, in their nature the most opposite ; a con- tempt of religion itself, or a high degree of devotional feeling. They who consider the objects of religion as visionary and uncertain, or who, rejecting revelation, feel their inability to find a place where they may fix their footing, will naturally feel an emotion of contempt for theological contests, similar to that which we should ex- perience towards men who were fighting for possessions in the air. There are not a few who would engage with the ut* most seriousness and ardor in a dispute on the nature and effects of paper currency, who would be ashamed of being suspected of directing their attention for a moment to the most weighty questions in theology. Attentive to all the aspects and combinations of the material and of the political world, they are accustomed to regard re- ligion as a sort of Utopia, a land of shadow and of fiction, where, wrapt in pleasing vision, Credulity reposes on the lap of Imposture. This sort of persons are so completely overcome by the enchantments of the present state, so entirely devoted to the wisdom which St. James denomi- nates earthly and sensual, that they are incapable of being impressed with a conviction of the possibility of a higher order of objects, or a more elevated and refined condition of being, than that with which they are con- versant; and though they may possess a subtle and penetrating genius, they are not less disqualified for re- llgious inquiries than an idiot or an infant. Tliey mind earthly things. How far the indisposition to religious controversy which prevails at pres^ant, may be justly ascribed to this Sadducean temper, I shall not pretend to determine. It is certain, however, that, in some, this indisposition pro- ceeds from a better cause. While the former class of persons think religion not worth disputing about, there are others who conceive it to be a subject too sacred for dispute. They wish to confine it to silent meditation, to sweeten solitude, to inspire devotion, to guide the prac- tice, and purify the heart, and never to appear in public but in the character of the authentic interpreter of the will of Heaven. They conceive it degraded whenever it is brought forward to combat on the arena. We are fully convinced, that a disputatious humor is unfavorable to piety ; and that controversies in religion have often been unnecessarily multiplied and extended ; but how they can be dispensed with altogether, we are at a loss to discover, until some other method is discovered of con- futing error, than sound and solid argument. As we no longer live in times (God be thanked !) when coercion can be employed, or when any individual, or any body of men, are invested with that authority which could silence disputes by an oracular decision, there appears no possibility of maintaining the interests of truth, with- out having recourse to temperate and candid controversy. Perhaps the sober use of this weapon may not be with- out its advantages, even at the present season. Prone as we are to extremes, may there not be some reason to apprehend, we have passed from that propensity to mag- nify every difference subsisting among Christians, to a neglect of just discrimination, to a habit of contemplating the Christian system as one in which there is little or XV nothing that remains to be explored ? Let us cultivate the most cordial esteem for all that love the Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity. Let us anxiously guard against that asperity and contempt which have too often mingled with theological debates ; but let us aim, at the same time, to acquire and retain the most accurate conceptions of religious truth. Every improvement in the knowl- edge of Christ and the mysteries of his Gospel, will abundantly compensate for the labor and attention ne- cessary to its attainment. However unhappily controversies have too often been conducted, the assistance they have afforded in the dis- covery of truth, is not light or inconsiderable. Not to mention the Reformation, which was principally effected by controversy, how many truths have, by this means, been set in a clearer view ; and, while the unhappy pas- sions it has awakened have subsided, the light struck out in the collision has been retained and perpetuated. As the physical powers are scarcely ever exerted to their utmost extent, but in the order of combat, so intel- lectual acumen has been displayed to the most advan- tage, and to the most effect, in the contests of argument. The mind of a controversialist, warmed and agitated, is turned to all quarters, and leaves none of its resources unemployed in the invention of arguments, tries every weapon, and explores the hidden recesses of a subject with an intense vigilance and an ardor which it is next to impossible, in a calmer state of mind, to command. Disingenuous arts are often resorted to, personalities are mingled, and much irritative matter is introduced ; but it is the business of the attentive observer to separate these from the question at issue, and to form an impar- tial judgment of the whole. In a word, it may be truly XVI affirmed, that the evils occasioned by controversy are transient } the good it produces is pern)anent. These observations I beg leave to submit to the reader, as an apology for the republication of a Treatise v^hich is confessedly controversial. Coinciding with the venerable author in the general aim and drift of the fol- lowing sheets, I am far from pledging myself to the ap- probation and support of every position contained in them ; nor would I be understood to attach all the im- portance to some of the points in discussion, which they appear, in his estimation, to have possessed. If there be any impression in the following Treatise, which implies that the questions at issue betwixt the Calvinists and Arminians are of the nature of funda- mentals, (of which, however, I am not aware,) 1 beg leave, as far as they are concerned, to express my ex- plicit dissent; being fully satisfied that upon either sys- tem the foundations of human hope remain unshaken, and that there is nothing in the contrariety of views en- tertained on these subjects, which ought to obstruct the most cordial affection and harmony among Christians. Having no pecuniary interest in this work, I may, perhaps, be allowed with the more freedom to communi- cate my opinion of its merit. I am much mistaken if the candid reader will not perceive in the author an impar- tial love of truth, together with a degree of ingenuity and acuteness in its illustration and defence, not always to be met with in theological discussions. The sentiments of my honored father were decidedly Calvinistic. His object, however, in the following Treatise, was not so much to recommend that system in general, as to disengage it from certain excrescences, v^rhich he considered as weakening its evidence and im- pairing its beauty. On reviewing his religious tenets XVll during the latter years of his life, and impartially com- paring them with the Scriptures, he was led to discard some opinions which he had formerly embraced, and which he afterwards came to consider as having a per- nicious tendency. From the moral impotence which the oracles of truth ascribe to man in his fallen state, a certain class of di- vines were induced to divide moral and religious duties into two classes, natural and spiritual; comprehending under the latter, those which require spiritual or super- natural assistance to their performance ; and under the former, those which demand no such assistance. Agree- able to this distinction, they conceived it to be the duty of all men to abstain from the outward acts of sin, to read the Scriptures, to frequent the worship of God, and to attend with serious assiduity to the means of grace ; but they supposed that repentance, faith in Christ, and the exercise of genuine internal devotion, were obliga- tory only on the regenerate. Hence their ministry con- sisted almost entirely of an exhibition of the peculiar mysteries of the gospel, with few or no addresses to the unconverted. They conceived themselves not war- ranted to urge them to repent and beheve the gospel, those being spiritual duties, from whose obligation they were released by the inability contracted by the fall. These conclusions were evidently founded upon two assumptions ; first, that the impotence which the Scrip lures ascribe to the unregenerate is free from blame, so as to excuse them from all the duties to which it ex- tends. In opposition to this, the Author of the follow- ing Treatise has proved, in a very satisfactory manner, that the inability under which the unconverted labor is altogether of a moral nature, consisting in the corrup- tion of the will, or an aversion to things of a spiritual and B divine nature ; that it is in itself criminaJ ; and that, acr far from affording an excuse for what would otherwise be duty, it stamps with its own character all its issues and productions. In considering- the moral character of an action, we are naturally led to inquire into its motive, and according as that is criminal, laudable, or indifferent, to character- ize the action whence it proceeds. The motive, how- ever, appears no otherwise entitled to commendation, than as it indicates the disposition of the agent ; so that in analyzing the elements of moral character, we can as- cend no liigher than to the consideration of the dispo- sition, or the state of the will and of the affections, a? constituting the essence of that portion of virtue or of vice which we respectively ascribe to it. To proceed farther will only involve us in a circle, since to what- ever we might trace the disposition in question, should we be induced, for example, to ascribe it to the free ex- ercise of the will, that exercise would fall under the same predicament, and be considered either as virtuous or vicious, according to the disposition whence it pro- ceeds. When the Scriptures have placed the inability of mankind to yield holy and acceptable obedience in an evil disposition, or in blindness and hardness of heart, they have conducted us to the ultimate point on this subject, and have established the doctrine of human criminality upon a basis which cannot be shaken or dis- turbed, without confounding the first principles of moral discrimination. Though it is manifest this impotence is entirely of a moral nature, totally distinct from the want of natural faculties, it is equally evident, that to what- ever extent it exists, while it actually subsists, it is as effectual an impediment to the performance of holy actions as any physical privation whatever ; and on that account, and that alone, may, without absurdity, be styled an inabilitij.* This important distinction was not altogether unknown to our earlier divines, though they neglected to avail themselves of it as fully as they ought. It is clearly stated by the great Mr. Howe, in his Bless- edness of the Righteous, as well as adverted to by Mr. Baxter in several of his practical works. But the earliest regular treatise on this subject it has been my lot to meet with, was the production of Mr. Towman, an emi- nent non-conformist divine. In his dissertation on moral impotence, as he styles it, he has anticipated the most important arguments of succeeding writers, and has evinced, throughout, a most masterly acquaintance with his subject. This work is mentioned in terms of high respect by Nelson, in his Life of Bishop Bull, whore- marks, that his thoughts were original, and that he had hit upon a method of defending Calvinism against the objections of Bull and of others, peculiar to himself. His claim to perfect originality, however, was not so well founded as Nelson supposed. Since his time the subject has been fully discussed by the celebrated Jona- than Edwards, in his treatise on the Will, and the dis- tinction defended with all the depth and precision pe- culiar to that amazing genius. Another principle assumed as a basis by the high Cal- vinists, is, that the same things cannot be the duty ol man, and the gift of God : or, in other words, that what is matter of promise, can on no occasion, be the matter * This truth is lost sight of by these preachers among us, who asseit *' that it is as easy to give up the affections to God as it is to rise from our seat." The difference in nature between physical and moral anability > does not destroy the reality of either: the latter is as reoZas tfee former' .and may be as absolute. Ed. of obligation. The Scriptures frequently affirm faith and repentance to be the gifts of God ; hence it is con- cluded that they cannot be obligatory on the unregene- rate ; a conclusion diametrically opposed to innumera- ble passages in the Old and New Testament, which insist, in the most peremptory style, on true conversion and a lively faith, as the most essential duties, which other passages are equally express in exhibiting as mat- ter of promise. A neio heart will I give them, says the Lord by Ezekiel, and a new spirit will I put within them, and I will take away the heart of stone, and give them a heart of flesh. The same prophet cries, Make you a new heart, for lohy viiLl ye die, 0 house of Israel ? in exact accordance with the language of St. James, Cleanse your hands, ye sinners, ard purify yovr hearts, ye douhle-viinded. The burden of our Saviour's minis- try, as well as that of his forerunner, was, Repent, for the kingdom of God is at hand ; while St. Peter, who perfectly knew the genius of Christianity, affirms that Christ is exalted to give repentance and the remission of sins. Circumcise your hearts, said Moses, and be no longer stiff-necked: the same Moses had been previously commissioned to declare, The Lord thy God shall cir- cumcise thine heart and the heart of thy seed. Now the circumcision of the heart we are taught by St. Paul in his Epistle to the Romans, to regard as the distinguish- ing feature of the truly regenerate — of him who is a Jew inwardly, whose praise is not of man, but of God. Whoever impartially weighs the import of these Scrip- lures, must be convinced that the same things are, in fact, matter of command, and the subject of promise, and must, consequently, be prepared to acquiesce in the de- cision of infinite wisdom on this subject, however much XXI he may be at a loss to explain or account for it. The consistency of the promises and of the commands in question, arises from the matter of each being of a moral nature. If we will allow ourselves to reflect, we shall perceive that the will, and the will only, is the proper object of command, and that an agent is no other- wise accountable, or susceptible of moral government, than as he is the subject of voluntary powers : we shall also perceive that the disordered state of the will, or the radical indisposition of an agent to comply with legiti- mate commands, which is the same thing, by no means exempts him from their obligation, nor tends in the least degree to render the addressing such commands to him absurd or improper. That they will not be complied with, while that disordered state subsists, is true: but legitimate commands, enforced by proper sanctions, are amongst the strongest motives ; that is, they tend in their own nature to incline the will, and therefore they cannot be withheld, without virtually relinquishing the claim of authority and dominion. This may suffice to evince the propriety of issuing commands, notwithstand- ing the known and radical indisposition to comply ; or, which comes to the same thing, whatever be the state of the will. With respect to the other side of the supposed contradiction, what can be plainer than that the will, as well as every other faculty of the mind, is under divine control, and that God can with infinite ease, in what instances, and in what manner he please, so change and modify it, as to induce a prompt and cheerful compliance with his requisition .'' What should prevent him, at whose disposal are the hearts of the mightiest of men, to make his people zoilling in the daij of his power ? It is instructive, as well as amusing, to trace the coincidence which is often found betwixt systems which appear at first view at the utmost variance from each other. The grosser Arminians and Pelagians con- tend, that it is the duty of all men to repent and believe, because all possess an inherent power of so doing, with- out special or supernatural assistance. The high Cal- vinists, on the contrary, deny that any man in a state of unregeneracy is under an obligation to perform those duties, because they are not possessed of the requisite ability. Thus both concur in making moral ability the measure of obligation ; a position which, when the terms are accurately defined and cleared of their am- biguity, conducts us to this very extraordinary conclu- sion, that men are obliged to just as much of duly as they are inclined to. On these, and other points con- nected with them, the reader, if we are not mistaken, will find much solid instruction in the following Treatise, accompanied with such a constant attention to the great end of theological discussion, the promotion of practical piety, as can scarcely fail of affording high satisfaction to serious minds. To this Treatise, and to another on a similar subject, by my excellent and judicious friend, Mr. Fuller, the Dissenters in general, and the Baptists in particular, are under great obligations, for emancipa- ting them from the fetters of prejudice, and giving free scope to the publication of the gospel. By these means a considerable revolution has been effected in the senti- ments of the denomination to which I have the honor to belong: the excrescences of Calvinism have been cut off; the points of defence have been diminished in num- ber, and better fortified; truth has shone forth with brighter lustre, and the ministry of the go-pel been ren- dered more simple, more practical, and more efficacious. XXIIl In reply to such as may object to the metaphysica! subtlety which pervades some parts of the following Treatise, I would avail myself of the distinction adaiira-* bly illustrated by tlie author of the Light of Nature pursued.* He observes, that although metaphysical reasoning rarely, if ever, conduces to the discovery of truth, it is of great advantage in the detection of sophis- try ; and that the mist and confusion in which moral subjects have been involved, by crude and undigested metaphysics, can only be exploded by the temperate use of that which is true and genuine ; so that the chief praise of metaphysics is the cure of its own ills, the repair of the mischief which itself has wrought. The reader will observe, that the author employs metaphysics, not to rear the fabric of truth, which can only be effected by a profound deference to inspiration, but to demolish a rotten superstition which conceals its beauty. For the want of elegance or polish, discernible in the following sheets, it will be sufficient apology to inform the reader, that the author, destitute of the advantages of early education, had no other resources to depend upon, in his religious inquiries, than what were derived from the vigor of his understanding, and his unbiassed integrity of heart. Had he enjoyed the benefit of literary cul- ture, he would have undoubtedly written in a style and manner more adapted to gain the attention of tha supe- rior classes : whether his reasoning would have been more cogent, or his method of handling his subject better fitted for the instruction of plain serious Christians, for whose benefit he principally laboured, i,s more question- able. * Abrsham Tucker. Gratitude and veneration compel me to add, that with all the imperfections of the work, and the disadvan- tages under which the author of it labored, I shall ever esteem it one of the greatest favors an indulgent Provi- dence has conferred upon me, to have possessed such a father, whom in all the essential features of character it will be ray humble ambition to imitate, though con- scious it must ever be I'aud passibus aeqtiis. R. H. Sept. 1824. HELP TO ZION'S TRAVELLERS, &c. [SAiAH, Ivii. 14. Cast ye up, cast ye up, prepare the ivay, take up the stumbling-hlock out of the way of my people. These words seem to have been the language of those who in a time of general declension adhered to God and religion, and in every difficul- ty and danger trusted in the Lord, being encour- aged by his precious promises, as mentioned in the preceding verse. Knowing, by mournful experi- ence, the various obstacles and intricacies which annoy and perplex the heavenly traveller in times of distress and obscurity, they are represented as saying, on behalf of the discouraged and entanglet^ to those who were employed in the ways of Zion, i Cast ye up, cast ye up, prepare the way, &c. I Whether the text be considered as historical, or ' prophetical, as a relation of what was the request of the godly in the days of the prophet, or a pre- C 26 HELP TO ZIOn's TRAVELLERS. diction of what would be solicited in some future period, it is evident from the words that the people of God are represented as on a journey, seeking a better country, which is an heavenly ; therefore are frequently called strangers, and pilgrims on the earth ; that the way in which they are to walk is not at all times easy to be discovered ; and when obscurity attends the path, hesitation prevents a progress. Hence the servants of the Lord are call- ed upon to cast up and prepare the way, to render it more visible and obvious to every spiritual pas- senger, to see that it be raised or elevated, and thereby rendered safe, even when floods of perse- cution and temptation abound, and made as plain as possible, by the removal of everything tending to injure the weak or benighted traveller: there- lore it is added. Take up the stumbling-block out of the way of my people. This desire, this request seems to be represented as the personal and united wish of every good man, whether in the days of the prophet, or in future periods of time. For thus saith the Lord, "He that putteth his trust in me — shall say. Cast ye up, cast ye up, prepare the way, take up the stumbling-block out of the way of my people." Though stumbling-block is mentioned only in the singular, as if pointing to some one danger or difficulty to be removed, yet it is evident from Scripture, that various things are so denominated; but the singular number only being used in the words, may denote the dreadful nature and dan- HELP TO ZIOn's TRAVELLERS. 27 gerous tendency of the doctrine and practice of idolatry, which was the stumbling-block Balaam taught Balak to east before the children of Israel, and against which the prophet in this chapter had been bearing his testimony. The doctrine of idol- atry in its different forms has been, and continues to be, a fatal stumbling-block to many : hence the church of Pergamos was censured for keeping in her community them that held the doctrine of Balaam. Rev. ii. J4. Again, if the text be consid- ered as the language of every believer, it may re- fer to, or include, whatever was or may be found of a stumbling nature to each of them. The ex- periences of Christians are very different respect- ing what is, or has been, to them of a trying, per- plexing nature ; and as each Christian is ready to fear what has been the principal stumbling-block to him may be the same to others, it is natural to suppose, that as every heart knows its own bitter- ness, each tried believer would thus express him- self, and in reference to his own experience, say, "Take the stumbling-block out of the way of my people." Besides, as there is often a prevalence of various errors in different periods, and distinct places; so, what is injurious to the people of God, as a pre- vailing stumbling-block in their way, is variable, according to the methods taken to obscure, mis- represent, or oppose the solemn and sacred truths, which God has graciously revealed in his word ; 28 HELP TO ZIOn's TRAVELLERS. or lessen their genuine influence and native ten- dency, as recorded in the holy Scriptures. From these considerations we may infer, that though the text speaks in the singular number, yet the servants of the Lord must expect to have various things of a stumbling nature to remove, according to the different exercises of the saints, or the injury done to truth at different times, and by different persons. The ministers of Christ are set for the defence of the gospel, and are appointed to help the faith and joy of those who have believed through grace. And as this is a day in which errors of various kinds abound, a day of gloominess and perplexity to many sincere Christians who desire to know the truth as it is in Jesus, to be devoted to him through life, as well as found in him at death ; for the sake of such I would endeavor, as the Lord shall help, to remove some of those stumbling-blocks, which lie in their v/ay, relating to DOCTRINAL, EXPERIMENTAL and PRACTICAL RELIGION. DEITY OF CHRIST. 29 PART I. DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. CHAPTER I. — THE DEITY OF CHRIST. Respecting doctrinal difficulties, we may ob- serve the most common and artful methods taken by many to overturn the soul-supporting truth of Christ's divinity. It is only from the sacred Scrip- tures we can have information respecting the per- son and work of our precious Redeemer: to these he appealed in the days of his flesh, saying, Search the Scriptures, for they testify of me: but with what deceitfulness is the word of God handled by many, when the person of Christ is the suhject of inquiry! [Instances might easily be multiplied; but I shall mention only the following.] 1. Some, in order to overthrow his claim to divinity, and the supreme love of his people, have collected a number of passages of Scripture, which plainly declare his inferiority to God : from which they infer, with an appearance of gravity and good will to truth, that as Scripture is evi- dently consistent with itself, he therefore who is therein declared to be inferior to deity, cannot possibly be divine. But a little attention is suffi- cient to discover that art is substituted in the room of argument, and sophistry occupies the 30 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. place of sense. Every good man will rejoice in the harmony and consistency of divine revelation, and readily allow that inferiority and equality are opposites, and that in the sense in which Christ is spoken of as inferior, he is not, cannot be equal with God. But as in the person of Christ two distinct na- tures are united, in consequence of which he is Immanuel, God with us; therefore it does not fol- low, because he has a nature inferior to God, yea, even to angels, that his superior nature is not properly divine. Ten thousand testimonies in proof of his humanity do not in the least degree enervate his claim to deity: a very small attention to the subject under consideration, is suffieient to discover the fallaciousness of such reasoning as the above. For those who maintain the divinity of the blessed Saviour, as firmly believe him to be properly man,* as they do who deny him to be God over all. It is our unspeakable felicity, that the Son of God was sent into the world as a Mediator, to * The doctrine of Sabellianism, viz : That Christ's body was truly human ; but was animated by the inhabitation of Deity, as the bodies of men are by that of their souls, is often adopted by worthy Christians through mere want of reflection. It may be accounted for, from the fact, that the full humanity of the Redeemer is, per- haps, less frequently insisted on from the pulpits of Trinitarians, than its importance, and its obviousness ia the sacred writings, would seem to require. Ed. DEITY OF CHRIST. 31 make peace between Jehovah in his public char- acter as a governor, and rebelHous men, that the Lord God might dwell among them, and they with him. In order to accomplish which, it was necessary he should assume human nature, and dwell among us. To reconcile God and man, it was needful he should be a middle person, possess- ing the nature of hath, and as equally interested in favor of each party, be able to establish Heaven's righteous claim, and raise self-ruined man to a state of safety, dignity, and delight. Considered as a complex person, he kindly condescended to act on our behalf in office ca- pacity, as if inferior to Deity. For as Mediator he acted as under the direction and commission of his Father ; and as such, was God's servant, though his Son ; therefore said, of himself he could do nothing: not through the want of ability, but being under official obligations to adhere to his Father's directions. Though an ambassador can do nothing of himself, but is bound in duty to act in all things in conformity to his instructions, yet it is not from thence inferable that his nature, ability, or mental powers, are inferior to those of his sovereign ; for the restriction or limitation is not the effect of personal debility, but of office capacity. The blessed Jesus is therefore not only inferior to G&d as man, but as Mediator ; never- theless, inferiority in office does not prove, nor imply, an inferiority of nature. Nay, on the con- trary, the errand on which he came, and the work 32 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. assigned him to perform, were so infinitely im- portant, awful, and arduous, that he could not have discharged his trust without the power and penetration of Deity. Hence he appealed to his works in proof of his divine mission, likewise as evidences of his filial relation to God, in such a sense as exposed him to the charge of hlasphemy, had he not been properly divine: John x. 24 — 38. His true dignity as a divine person being infer- able from what he did, his enemies were on that account inexcusable, because his works sufficiently demonstrated to every honest inquiring mind, who he was, as well as from whence he came ; though it was inconsistent with his then state of humiliation and debasement, to allow the glories of divinity to shine forth in their native lustre and infinite splendour : hence he repeatedly charged his friends not to publish to the world who he was, till after his resurrection from the dead. That he was a man, his enemies knew as well as his dis- ciples; yea, some of them thought him to be the promised Messiah, and said one to another. This is the heir, let us kill him : but as a divine person they knew him not ; for, had they known him, they would not have crucified the Lord of Glory. For the principal charge brought against him, and for which he was condemned, was, that, being a man, he made himself equal with God ; John v. 18. Chap. xix. 7. If Christ exposed himself to death through am- biguity, how did he witness a good confession at DEITY OF CHRIST. 33 Pilate's bar? Ifhe did not mean an equality with God, which the Jews thought he did, strange that his regard to truth did not lead to an explanation of what he intended. It is no wonder that priests and others in that day of prevalent ignorance and perverseness, should have a secret conviction ofhis office capacity as Mes- siah, without an idea of his divinity, seeing, some under the profession of gospel ministers, acknowl- edge and plead for his divine mission, and yet op- pose and reject with contempt the idea of his being a divine person. How kind and wonderful the condescension of the blessed Jesus, that he should stoop to take upon him human nature (not as when in its orig- inal dignity, but in its debased state) in order to suffer, and serve, in favour of those who would, he knew, on that very account, rob him ofhis repu- tation, as a divine person I It is mournful to think he should be despised on earth for that, on the ac- count of which he is admired in heaven. Consider the complex capacity of the adorable Jesus as God, and as man, with his acting as Me- diator, in consequence of such an union of dis- tinct natures, and then the Scripture account of his inferiority and subjection to the divine Father will appear quite consonant with the doctrine of his true and proper divinity ; and the stumbling- block aforesaid be totally removed. But when the aforesaid [difficulty] is removed, behold another is 34 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. with equal art thrown in the way of the ignorant and unwary, which is 2. A perversion of the terms used in treating of this important subject. In consequence of such unwarrantable, not to say unmanly craft, the unity of the divine e55ence is represented to be so evi- dently inconsistent with a plurality of divine per- sons, as if it was universally agreed lo consider them as absolute contradictions, and to convey ir- reconcileable ideas; whereas it is very well known that those who believe the divinity of the blessed Jesus (and the Holy Ghost) as firmly maintain the unity of the divine essence, or that there is only one God, as they do who oppose a plurality of divine persons. Yet things are so represented as if they and the Trinitarians agreed in that about which they differ, and again as if they differed about that in which they are agreed ; for the consistency be- tween a plurality of persons in the one divine essence, is the very thing for which those contend who believe the divinity of Christ. And that there is but one living and true God, both parties unite and agree in acknowledging. The doctrines of unity in the divine essence, and a plurality of persons, are in their very nature distinct, and ought never to be confounded. But that they are opposites and inconsistent in reference to God, has not yet been proved, and I believe never will. But though the adversaries of Christ's divinity oppose the one to the other, as if they were allowed contrarieties ; yet, by and by, they will treat those DEITY OF CHRIST. 35 very terms by which the doctrines are distin- guished, as if they were intended to express the same thing, or convey similar ideas. Hence, if the essence of God be the subject treated of, the term person is immediately substituted, as if synony- mous with that o^ essence, and then with an air of triumph it is inferred, that. If God he one, he is not two or three. Again, if the doctrine of divine per- sonality be the matter of immediate consideration, and scriptural j^roofs be adduced in support of a plurality of persons truly rfii?i;ie, behold the idea of essence is by them substituted in the room of per- son, and unity instead of plurality, and by the help of such a substitutioji and perversion of terms, and shuffle of ideas, they very gravely exclaim against Tritheism, i. e. the doctrine of three Gods. As the friends of Christ's divinity never assert God to be three in the sense in which he is one, nor one in the same sense in which he is three, but perpetually dis- tinguish between a plurality of persons and the unity of God, the methods taken as aforesaid are disingenuous, contemptible, mean, and even be- neath notice, were it not that thereby inattentive minds are imposed upon, the opposition to the Redeemer's dignity is supported, and weak Chris- tians are stumbled. It is evident, however, beyond contradiction, that according to the Scriptures there was a plu- rality of persons antecedent to creation ; for in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, the same was in the 86 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. beginning with God: all things were made by him, and without him, was not any thing made that was made ; John i. 1,2, 3: that glorious per- son who was with God was therefore distinct from him with whom he was, and yet of the same nature, being one in essence with the Father. For the word was God, and that Jesus Christ is intended by the Word who was in the beginning with God, and the author of creation, is plain from verse 10. He was in the world, and the world was made by him. Again, verse 14, The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us, and we be- held his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. As he was before all things, so by him all things consist; Col. i. 17. He was with the Father from everlast- ing, and all that is done in time is according to the eternal purpose which the Father purposed in him. Hence God chose his people in him, committed them to his care in the everlasting covenant, and promised eternal life in him before the world began. Many instances might be given of Christ's existence before his incarnation, as he said, Before Abraham was, I am ; John viii. 58. The plural pronouns used in Scripture by the great Eternal when speaking of acts, authority, and properties peculiar to Deity, are striking proofs of a plurality of persons in one essence. God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness ; Gen. i. 26. Behold the man is be- come like one of us ; chap. iii. 22. Let us go DEITY OP CHRIST. 37 down and confound their language : chap. xi. 7. Whom shall I send, who will go for us ? Isaiah, vi. 8. And respecting all other objects of worship, Jehovah's language is, Produce your cause, saith the Lord, bring forth your strong reasons, saith the King of Jacob ; let them show the former things what they be, that we may consider them. Or declare us things to come, that we may know that ye are gods; yea, do good or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together. Isaiah xli. 21, 22, 23. Again, to stain the pride of man and curb human arrogance, he asserts his divine prerogative in the following solemn and instruc- tive interrogations. Who hath declared from the beginning that we may know ? And before time, that we may say be is righteous ? I beheld, and there was no man, no counsellor, that when I asked them could answer a word ; Isaiah, xli. 26, 28. From these and many more instances which might be produced, it is evident, that there is a plurality of persons in the one eternal God, even the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and that these three are one. In the name of which sacred three the holy ordinance of baptism was ordered to be administered. The adversaries of Christ's divinity being con- scious, that the Scriptures treat of a plurality of persons employed in creation, &c. and lest the artful manner of treating the argument respect- ing person and essence as aforesaid should not block up the way leading to the divine glories of 38 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. Jesus, have invented another stunnbling-block to render the path of faith in Christ's divinity quite impassable, which is [to advocate] 3. The pre-existence of Christ's soul. It is acknowledged some have maintained this senti- ment without any designed injury to the doctrine of the Trinity. But it is equally evident that some of the most virulent enemies of Christ's di- vine personality, find it impossible to give their scheme of opposition even the appearance of con- sistency, but as aided by the aforesaid hypothesis; therefore great pains have been taken to render it plausible, in consequence of which it has proved a stumbling-block to some. But that it was not a human soul which existed with the Father before time, and which made the world, and to which God spake, saying. Let us make man, Slc. &c. but his own infinitely glo- rious Son, will appear, if the following things be duly considered. He who was with the Father, was with him from everlasting, rejoicing always before him, and whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting ; Mic. v. 2, and who should be called, though clothed with humanity, the everlasting Father, the mighty God ; Isaiah ix. 6. But it is absurd to suppose a creature to have existed before time began. Every creature once was not ; to suppose a creature always to have been, is to form an idea of a creature which was never created ; all things were made by Je- sus Christ, without him nothing was made that DEITY OF CHRIST. 39 was made ; but according: to the aforesaid opin- ion, there was a creature made which Jesus Christ was no way concerned in the formation of; for a creature cannot be thought to have created itself, without absurdly supposing it to have been before it was, to exist prior to its ex- istence, or to act whilst it was nothing, in order to be something — the above absurdities are unavoid- able: if the Scripture account of the creation (as the production of a plurality of persons) be credit- ed, and the divinity of Christ be denied. As a soul could not create itself, so neither could it be the author of the other ])arts of the creation, which Jesus Christ is positively declared to be- For by him were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, principalities, or powers : all things were created by him and for him; Col. i. 16. If a human soul be the author of creation, various creatures would be above their Creator. Angels, for instance, would be superior to their Maker, and excel him in strength; for man (which Christ is asserted only to be) is naturally inferior to those celestial spirits. Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; which supposes the angels were, when his humanity was made ; Heb. ii. 7. The ac- knowledgment of Christ as Creator, renders the denial of Viis proper divinity inexcusable, and saps the foundation of not only revealed, but natural re- ligion : for, if Jesus be the former of all things, 40 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal })ower and Godhead, so that they are without excuse who glorify him not as God. Rom. i. 20, 21. Some assert that Christ was only an instrument in creation ; but the work of creation was of such a nature as to exclude the idea of an instrumental creator. An instrument, if concerned at all, must have been employed either before or after the pro- duction of being, for there was no medium. Not before, because prior to creation there was not any thing existing for an instrument to act upon, or to be employed about. Not afte7\ because when a creature does exist, it is too late for an instrument to be employed in producing it. Nothing short of infinite agency could possibly be concerned in creation ; the persons so engaged were properly divine, and essentially one. However, that there was no instrument concerned is beyond all dis- pute, if what Jehovah says be duly regarded ; for he declares there was none such with him. Prov. viii. ; Mic. v. 2. Thus saith the Lord thy Re- deemer, and be that formed thee from the womb ; I am the Lord that niaketh all things, that stretch- ed out the heavens alone, that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself. Isaiah xliv. 24. Which ALONE spreadeth out the heavens. Job ix. 8. Hence it appears, that though there were distinct persons employed in creation, yet they were so DEITY OF CHRIST. 41 united as to be included in the one all-creating Jehovah. 4. To render the scheme of opposition to Christ's divinity more consistent, and the idea of the soul existing before time, instead of the Son of God, less exceptionable ; it has been thought proper to exclude the body from being an essen- tial constituent part of a man. Such an exclu- sion to be sure was a happy thought, and quite necessary; for without it the all-creating creature would not have been j)roperly either God, angel, or man. But that it might be considered as be- longing to some scale or class of being, " It is asserted to be a proper human person, a true and real man, the body being only a temporary cover- ing for, but not a constituent part of, human na- ture." But this method of de|;reciating the divine glories of the blessed Jesus will prove abortive, if the Scri})ture account of human nature be attend- ed to; and without doubt he who made man could best describe him. From the sacred pages we learn, that the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul ; Gen. ii. 7: and that the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman ! and Adam said. She shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man. Again, to Adam as a transgressor, the Lord said. Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return ; Gen. iii. 19. Man shall return again to dust. Now as the soul was D 42 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. not formed of the dust, nor the rib of which Eve was made, taken out of the soul; but the rib from the body, and the body from the ground; there- fore the body must be a constituent part of man, for the body only returns to dust, and yet the Lord says, vian shall return thither. Job xxxiv. 15. Again : the personal name of man is often given to the body, which would be improper if the body was not a part of the person. Jacob in his affecting lamentation says, Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces. I will go down into the grave unto my son mourning: thus his father wept for him. Gen. xxxvii. 33, 35. It was not the soulj hut the feorf?/ of his son which he concluded was torn asunder ; nor his own soul, but his body, that would go down to the grave. And when the same patriarch was near death, he charged his sons, saying, Bury me with my fathers; in such a cave which he described ; add- ing, there they buried Abraham and Sai'ah his wife ; there they buried Isaac and Rebecca his wife, and there I buried Leah. Gen. xlix. 29, 3L And that the body of Christ was an essential part of his humanity, is evident from what the angel said to his weeping friends. He is not here, he is risen : Come, see the place where the Lord lay. Matt, xxviii. 6. But if the body was no proper constituent part of his manhood, /le never lay in the grave ; nor did he ever rise from the dead, for he did not die. They did not nail him to the tree ; the whole account of his corporal DEITY OF CHRIST. 43 sufferings is a mere fiction, if it be true, that his body was not a proper constituent part of himself. In a word, there never will be a resurrection of any man, if bodies are not essential to human na- ture, and this world of men are quite as invisible to each other as the world of angels are [to them.] According to that notion, the sight of a man is a singular rarity. That a soul can exist without a body is readily allowed, but such a separate ex- istence is the effect o^ death ; and can it be thought reasonable that Christ's first existence should be a state similar to that of the dead? Once more, on such a supposition Christ could not be the son of man in any sense, because his soul is said to exist before all men ;* and his body not a part of his * From a conviction of the singular absurdity attend- ing the supposition of a creature existing from eternity, some have boldly asserted that everlasting from which Christ is said to exist, only intends a measurable period, and therefore does not convey the idea of eternity, or unlimited duration. It is granted that by the term ever- lasting and eternal likewise, sometimes is intended no more than a very distant period, but that is not their native primary signification. But the natural meaning of the word is a perpetual existence or infinite duration. Hence we read, The eternal God is thy refuge, and un- derneath are the everlasting arms : Deut. xxxiii. 27. Art thou not from everlasting, O Lord, ray God ? Hab. i. 12. If it be said the existence of Christ is limited, as being only from everlasting, or ever the earth was, and that, before the mountains were brought forth, or the 4# DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. humanity. But he was the son of David, a des- cendant of Abraham, as the Scriptures assert, and as the apostle to the Hebrews said, " It is evident our Lord sprung out of Judah ;" Ileb. vii. 14. To conckide ; the incarnation of Christ was not only considered by the great apostle as an instance of infinite condescension, but admired by him and every believer in his day, as being in its nature really inexplicable, and truly mysterious ; they did not dispute the fact, though they could not con- ceive hoiv divinity and humanity were united in one person ; but rejoiced in, and steadily support- ed, its reality as the pillar and ground of the truth. "Without controversy, great is the mys- tery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh :" 1 Tim. iii. 15, 16. "The Word" which "was God," "was made flesh, and dwelt amongst us." But if Christ be only a man, or a mere creature, the wonder ceases, for it cannot be thought a highest part of the dust, were qualifying terms tending to establish a limited idea, therefore though Christ was from everlasting, yet not eternal ; we answer, the Holy Ghost has taken care to guard his people against sophistry so dishonoring to Christ : for Moses, the Man of God, when treating on Jehovah's eternity, and human mortality, says, Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed tlie earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting thou art God; Psal. xc. 2. Again, thy throne is of old, thou art from everlasting; Psal. xciii. 2. See Mich. v. 2, DEITY OF CHRIST. 45 thing singular and surprising for a human soul to possess a body ; nor for God to manifest himself to a holy creature, and employ in his service a good man. It is truly lamentable and really astonishing that any who wish to be saved by Jesus, should endeavour to sink his character and diminish his dignity : Yea, rejoice in hope of proving the Sa- viour infinitely unworthy of their supreme love and delight. You happy souls who need, know and esteem the Redeemer, as infinitely powerful, and divinely precious — oh, pity the condition, and dread the deception, of such, whose peace and pleasure rise high in consequence of the Saviour sinking low in their esteem. Pray for them, and take heed lest you also be tempted ; and [labor] that your own faith may be firm in, and your love fer- vent to, the infinitely glorious and lovely Redeem- er. Consider and frequently contemplate the proofs of his [iroper divinity, as recorded in the sa- cred volume: such as the properties of which he is possessed, the work he has performed, the wor- ship he has received from angels and men, the divine names and titles which are given him, the honors ascribed to him, the unlimited confi- dence placed in him by good men in every age, and the claims which are made by him ; for he, who was never the subject of arrogance, thought it not robbery to be equal with God ; Phil. ii. 6. May the Lord grant that every reader may search the Scriptures which testify of Jesus, with godly fiiflcerity and gospel simplicity. To the upright, 46 DOCTRPNAL DIFFICULTIES. light shall rise in darkness. I might greatly en- large ; but it is hoped, that the above considera- tions may serve through the Divine blessing to re- move the common difficulties respecting the true knowledge of, and faith in, the Redeemer's dignity as a person properly divine. My heart's desire is, that all the saints may be brought to rejoice in Je- sus, as the mighty God, the Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty, llev. i. 8. CHAPTER II. Difficulties concerning the Love of God. That Jehovah changeth not, is a self-evident truth, a scripture axiom. " With him there is no variableness, nor shadow of turning." Being per- fection itself, therefore the properties of his nature, and purposes of his will, are absolutely unalterable. What he has determined, shall be done. " He is of one mind, and who can turn him ? For the counsel of the Lord standeth forever, the thoughts of his heart to all generations, and to Zion he says, he will rest in his love. He will rejoice over her with singing, for having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end." Notwithstanding the above and such like solemn declarations made by the God of truth, such ob- jections have been raised against the unchangea- ON LOVE TO GOD. 47 bleness of Jeiiovah's love, as greatly to perplex and stumble some who are evidently the distinguished objects of it. As wrong conclusions may be drawn from prin- ciples wliich are unexceptionably right, so I ap- prehend many of those things are indisputable facts from whence the changeable nature of God's love is inferred ; and indeed, it seems his people are more agreed in their primary principles, than in their conclusions. In the former there may be a happy union, though in the latter they widely differ, and cast stumbling-blocks in each other's way. For the exemplification and removal of which, as relating to the doctrine of divine love, it may be proper to observe, that creatures who are now the objects of God's indignation, were once loved by him ; those infernal spirits who kept not their first estate, though now the abhorred of the Lord, were, while innocent, the objects of his approbation ; and the same may be said of man, considered as in his present state of corruption, and his original state of perfection as created of God. John i. 1,14; Phil. ii. 6, 7. It is evident, God could not produce creatures morally defective, or disagreeable to himself; they were what he willed them to be, i. e. good, yea, very good, and as such were loved and delighted in, by their Maker. Every creature being Jeho- vah's production, therefore no creature was, in its original state, the object of his disapprobation : and yet many of them are now the declared objects of 48 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. his hatred and indignation. From the above self- evident facts, it is inferred by some sincere inquir- ers after truth, that the love of God is changeable, and not invariably fixed on its objects; which in- ference has perplexed many of the people of God, and proved a stumbling-block in their way to a proper acquaintance with several very important truths in divine revelation. From this source va- rious errors have proceeded, by which the glorious gospel of the grace of God has been beclouded, the faith of many Christians staggered, and their joy in Jesus and hope of glory greatly diminished. But that the above plausible inference is a false conclusion, (though drawn from undeniable facrs,) will I hope be made plainly [to] appear, if we im- partially survey the doctrine of Jehovah's love in the light of divine revelation. The love of God, according to the Scriptures, ought to be considered [under these distinctions, viz.] as Natural and as Sovereign. The righteous Lord loveth righteousness, and holiness is his per- petual delight. This love arises from the perfec- tion and purity of his nature, and has for its object his own holy image, as enstamped upon his rational creatures ; or in other words, in holy dispositions and corresponding acts, the Lord takes pleasure and delight. He is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity with approbation, or look on holiness with disgust. His hatred of sin, and love of purity, are not acts of divine sovereignty. Sin is not hateful because God willed it should be so, but is odious ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 49 in its own nature to every y)ure being; and is tiierefore infinitely hateful to an injinitely holy God . God does not hate sin, because he has by his law forbidden it ; but has forbidden it, because it is what he loathes, as contrary to his holy nature. Perfect conformity to God, and supreme delight in him as the chief good, are enforced by God's holy law, because of their native excellency and propriety. Holiness then, being the object of God's natural love, or essential approbation, and sin the reverse, it necessarily follows that every unholy creature is odious in the sight of God ; therefore a creature having lost its purity, ceases to be the object of his natural approbation ; yet the alteration is not in God, but in the creature, which is become, through moral impurity, what he abhors. God's natural love is still unalterably fixed on personal purity, wherever it is found ; but in reference to a polluted creature, love has lost its object, that on which it was fixed being quite annihilated or destroyed. Thus it appears that the various ranks of intelli- gent creatures were, in their original condition, interested in God's favour. Even those abomina- ble beings, called devils, were, while holy, the ob- jects of their Maker's love and approbation, as well as the angels who continue to shine in holy splendour and untainted purity. Though a part of the angelic world, and the whole human race, have, by their revolt from God, become vile, and E 50 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. cease to be the objects of the Lord's delight, yet there is no variableness or change in Jehovah. But, to every proper object, " God is love;" 1 John iv. 16 ; for God has no aversion to his creatures, simply considered as creatures; biu on account of their moral depravity ; nor does he necessarily love them, because they owe their existence to his sov- ereign will and almighty power ; but as the sub- jects of his moral image, which consists in righte- ousness and true holiness. As all mankind have lost the image of God in which they were created, and become base and abominable in his sight, be- ing Jilthy and ^-1^% before him, they must have continued in a condition eternally disgustful to God, and in a state tremendously terrible to them- selves, had not the Lord been pleased to show them kindness in a sovereign way ; being gracious- ly determined to save wiiom be thought proper, with an everlasting salvation. Tliat love from which salvation springs is [not natural but] prop- erly sovereign ; [not necessary bur] absolutely free. None are its objects because they deserved to be so, nor was God under any necessity of nature so to distinguish them ; but it consisted in a voluntary determination to do good to the persons he sover- eignly fixed upon as his peo[>le, with infinite and invariable delight. If, then, we consider the voluntary love of the great Eternal as distinct from, and yet harmoniz- ing with, that [natwal and necessary love] of which we have been* treating, difRculiies, which other- ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 51 wise are insurmountable, will disappear. That love which is essential, or natural to God, has per- sonal holiness or pure principles for its invariable object. But sovereign love fixed upon personst without a regard had to their dispositions as its cause ; which sovereign favour is entirely uninflu- ced by their dispositions, and is beautifully illus- trated by the Lord's voluntary favor to the person of Jacob, and the distinguished special privileges enjoyed by his posterity, without respect had to his having done either good or evil. Jacob have I loved, saith the Lord. Rom. ix. 13.^ And Moses, speaking of Israel as a chosen people, observes, The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you because ye were more in number than any people, (for ye were the fewest of all people,) but because the Lord loved you. Deut. vii. 7, 8. Such as it hath pleased the Lord to make his peo- ple, 1 Sam. xii. 22, may with humble joy and holy admiration say, "Bfrhold what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God." 1 John iii. 1. This sove- * The hatred of Esau, as opposed to the love of the Lord to Jacob, is not to be considered as implying any positive indignation to his person as a sinner; because the love and the hatred spoken of, was without their hav- ing done either good or evil ; it only intends his not be- ing loved as Jacob was. In this sense, hatred is to be understood in Deut, xxi. 15 > Luke xxiv. 26 ; and John xii. 25. 02 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. reign love of the Lord to his spiritual Israel, set apart his own son, Immanuel, as the head of his people, and gave their persons to him before the w^orld was ; and in time gave him to die for them. God sovereignly loved their persons, but abhorring their sinful conduct and criminal dispositions, was determined to remove that from them which he hated in them, and by creating them anew in Christ Jesus, or implanting holy and heavenly principles in their souls, to make them a holy peo- ple, that as such they might become the suitable, fit and proper objects of his natural, necessary, and essential love ; which, as aforesaid, has holiness for its invariable object. Sovereign love having their persons only for its objects, without being ex- cited by their dispositions, is therefore invariably the same, without addition or diminution. Hence all that is done for them, and wrought in them, is inconsequence of, and according to that great love wherewith he loved them, even when they were dead in trespasses and sins. This sovereign love is the fruit of God's good pleasure, or the effect of gracious good-will to them. The utility and pro- priety of the above distinction, were it sufficiently attended to, would appear as bright as the sun in a clear meridian. I wish some able pen would un- dertake to investigate the subject more fully than either my talents or time will admit of. However, the few following remarks I hope maybe of use to weak Christians, for whose sake I write, either to ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 53 rectify their judgments — stimulate their obedience — increase their joy, — or relieve their perplexity. 1. From the sacred oracles it appears, that God's necessary hatred to sin is not contrary to his sovereign love or gracious intentions to do good to his people, even while they are subjects of no other dispositions than what he abhors. If sover- eign love to the sinner was inconsistent with his infinite hatred to sin, who then could be saved? For fallen men are, as such, become altogether abominable in the eyes of their holy Maker, the imagination of their hearts being, while unrenew- ed, evil, only evil, and that continually. "They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good, no not one;" Psal. xiv. 1, 3; compared with Rom. iii. 9, 18. "We ourselves also, were sometimes foolish, disobedi- ent, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another." Tit. iii. 3. They who do such things are worthy of death, and likewise those who take pleasure in them that do them. Rom. i. 32. "So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God ;" Rom. viii. 8. Nevertheless, "God commended his love towards us, in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us;" Rom. v. 8. "Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins ;" 1 John iv. 10. "In this was the love of God man- ifest." Ver. 9. " Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with loving kindness 54 DOCTRINAL DimCULTlES. have I drawn thee ;" Jer. xxxi. 3. Jesus when pleading with his Father on hehalf of his chosen, says, "Thou hast loved them as thou hast loved me, and thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world." John xvii. 23, 24. "We all had our conversation in times past in the lust of the flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath (juickened us, &c." Eph. ii. 3, 4, 5. Respecting their persons they were lov- ed while in their sins ; but [they were] not loved in reference to theAv dispositions. No ; God necessarily hated, while he sovereignly loved. " But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour appear- ed toward man; not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost ;" Til. iii. 5. Being thus the workmanship of God created anew in Christ, the church becomes the object of the Lord's neces- sary love, or natural delight. As he saith, "I will caliber beloved which was not beloved;" Rom. ix. 25. 2. Those who are renewed in the spirit of their minds, and possessed of holy principles, and are undeniably, as such, the objects of God's natural love, yet through sin become the objects of his holy displeasure. Nevertheless, that does not sup- pose, nor imply any change in Jehovah. Not in his ON THE LOVE OF GOD 55 sovereign good will, [which has regard] to their persons, and which is still the same, being the ef- fect of his mere good pleasure, and not fixed on them because of any good moral quality in them. Nor is there any change in his natural love, be- cause only holiness is its invariable object. Agree- ably to, and in proof of the above, we read that though God loved, yet he greatly abhorred Israel, and was wroth with his inheritance. Ps. Ixxviii. 59, 62. Being defiled with their own works, therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his peo()le, insomuch that he abhorred his own in- heritance ;" Ps. cvi.40. " Nevertheless he regard- ed them when he heard their cry ;" ver. 44. "Yea, mine heritage, saith the Lord, is unto me as a lion in the forest, it crieth out against me, there- fore / hate it. I hate the dearly beloved of my soul ;" Jer. xii. 7, 8. "Thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities ;" yet sovereign grace breaks forth in Is- rael's favor, and Jehovah adds, "1, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins ;" Isaiah xliii. 24, 25. "I knew thou wouldest deal very treacherously, and was called a trangressor from the womb. Yet, saith the Lord, for my name's sake will I defer mine anger, and for my praise will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not oflT; Isaiah xlviii. 8,9. "For the iniquity of his covetousness was I wroth and smote him, I hid me and was wroth, and he went on frowardly in the way of his heart." And was not the desperate sinner made a 56 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. dreadful example of Divine displeasure? He must have been so, had not free exuberant grace inter- posed in his favor, saying, " I have seen his ways, and I will heal him," Isaiah Ivii. 17,18. Sovereign love triumphs in the sinner's salvation, through the merits of the Almighty Saviour, in a way which displays the infinite purity of Jehovah's nature and [his] unmerited favor. Sin gives many a mortal wound, but grace provides a cure. Thus, from the example of God's conduct to- ward backsliding saints, we have striking proofs that neither God's natural nor [his] sovereign love change their objects. Holiness is the invariable object of the former, and the persons of his people the ob- jects of the latter. I might add, all the good which sovereign grace does work, or implant in the hu- man heart, meets with God's necessary approba- tion in all its genuine operations. He atiends to the language of penitence with pleasure. He says of mourning Ephraim, whom he heard bemoaning himself, " My bowels are troubled for him, and I earnestly remember him still." With what melting pity does he address the soul that seeks for soli- tude to lament its doleful condition ? "O my dove, thou art in the clefts of the rocks ; let me see thy countenance, let me hear thy voice, for sweet is thy voice, and thy countenance is comely." Song ii. 14. Sovereign love having given sight to the soul which was before blind to the beauties of Im- manuel, to Jesus it now looks and loves ; and he being dehghted with the exercise of grace, savs, ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 57 "Thou hast ravished my heart, thou hast ravished my heart with one of thine eyes ; how fair is thy love, my sister, my spouse ! How much better is thy love than wine ; and the smell of thine oint- ments than all spices !" Song iv. 10. The produc- tions of sovereign grace God naturally loves, and therefore takes pleasure in them that fear him, in them who hope in his mercy. Psalm cxlvii. 11. Once more : 3. Of that love which is essential to the nature of God, good men are not equally the objects ; for as no man is its object but in consequence of being the subject of holiness, therefore a growth in grace, or in holy obedience, will ever meet with God's increasing approbation. Christ, as man, though ever pure, " increased in favor with God ;" Luke ii. 92. " Therefore doth my Father love me (said Jesus) because I laid down my life :" John X. 17. " He that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him. If a man love me, he will keep my words, and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. " John xiv. 21, 23. "For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God ;" John xvi. 27. "Keep yourselves in the love of God;" Jude, 21st verse- "As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you; continue ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love, even as I have kept my Father's command- ments and abide in his love;" John xv. 9, 10. 58 DOCTRINAL DIFFtCULTIES. Though all regenerate persons are evidently the equal objects of special sovereign favor, and with them, as in Christ, the Lord is well pleased for his righteousness' sake; Isaiah xlii. 21, and their per- sons are accepted in the beloved ; yet with many of them the Lord is not well pleased, with respect to the temper of their hearts, and manner of life. See 1 Cor. X. 4, 5- Therefore "only let your con- versation be as becometh the gos[)el of Christ." " We beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord Jesus Christ, that as ye have r^iceived of us how ye ought to walk, and to please God, so ye would abound more and more ;" Phil. i. 27. 1 Thess. iv. 1. "Knowing that your labour shall not be in vain in the Lord." ] Cor. xv. 58. "For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labor of love ;" Heb. vi. 10.* From the above we may infer: 1. That the everlasting damnation of those who kept not their first estate in which they enjoyed the * The meaning of the excellent autiior, may perhaps be more lucidly and connectly presented thus: No man is the object of God's natural love, unless he is the sub- feet of holiness ; for holiness is the proper and only ob- ject of this love ; and every man is thus beloved of God in proportion to the degree in which he is holy : but the children of God are holy in a great variety of degrees ; they are, therefore, in the same variety of degrees, the objects of God's natural love. Ed. ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 59 Divine approbation,* does not oppose the unchange- able nature of Jehovah's love, nor render the eter- nal salvation of his people y)recarious or uncertain. 2. How carefully phould every saint watch against every sin, and strive to grow in perfect conformity to his God. True happiness will ever be found inseparably connected with real holiness; and sin, wherever it is, will invariably remain the object of God's displeasure. On the account of this he hides his face, and is wroth with his people ; and though he pardon them, yet he will take vengeance on their inventions ; for whom he lov- eth he chasteneth. 3. How awfully miserable must our condition have been, having lost that rectitude of nature in which God delighted, had he not proceeded to- wards us in a way of sovereign grace, choosing us in, and committing our persons to the care of * That approbation was his natural, and not his sove- reign love : its object was their disposition, i. e. holiness, and not their persons. But this disposition they no longer possess ; hence he can no longer love it in them : yet the change is not in him, but in them. But his peo- ple the Lord loves with a sovereign love ; the object of this love is their persons, irrespective of their disposi- tions. Change, then, in their dispositions (as when they backslide,) effects no change in sovereign love ; for it takes no cognizance of dispositions. Yet, as we have seen above, it deprives them of God's natural love ; for their .sin is a removal of that holiness which is its proper object. Ed. 60 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. his own Son, laying our iniquities upon him, and punishing* him for them, and justifying us on his account, conveying hohness, pardon and peace, through him, to make us pure and spotless before his throne ! There, in that world of bliss, God, in all his essential glories, will be forever enjoyed the same as though sin had never been ; with ad- ditional pleasures arising from the amazing infinite source of sovereign spontaneous favor. The hearts of the redeemed will be ravished, their powers of mind animated, and their elevated songs make heaven's high arches ring with the joyful acclama- tion of. Salvation to our God and the Lamb. A full evidence of the infinite desert of sin, which seems to be intended by the smoke of the furnace as- cending before the throne, will heighten their ad- miration of sovereign love, and fill their capacious souls with unspeakable joy, profound reverence, and holy wonder. 4. Opposition to the sovereign grace of God is truly lamentable. How mournful to think that poor condemned criminals should be filled with enmity against that, in consequence of which, only, salvation can become the object of hope. * We cannot entirely approve of the author's phrase- ology in this place ; though we have no doubt of the cor- rectness of his meaning. Strictly speaking, punishment can be inflicted only on the guilty : suffering may fall on his substitute. Hence the Scripture says, *' he was bruised for our iniquities ;" but nowhere that he was punished for them. Ed. ON ELECTION. 61 It is a striking proof of the deceitful and infatu- ating nature of sin, and the pride of the human heart. CHAPTER III. THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. Some upright minds, being subject to discour- agements through misapprehensions which are often the fruit of misrepresentations of truth, I shall [now] attend to another subject nearly con- nected with the above, at the very name of which some professors are startled, though it is fre- quently met with in the Scriptures of truth. [This subject is the doctrine of Election.] 1. Election or choice always implies freedom of will in the person or persons who choose or elect. Constraint or compulsion is incompatible with, and opposite to choice, which must be voluntary or not at all. 2. Every elector has an end in view, in respect of which he makes his choice, or for the accom- plishment of which the choice is made. 3. The person chosen is always considered as passive, being entirely at the will of the elector, so far as relates to the act of choosing. These three ideas are inseparably connected with election, or a proper choice, whatever kind of election we refer to, whether made by God or man. But some young or weak Christians have confused or discouraging ideas of the doctrine 62 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. now under consideration, for want of attending to the different senses in which the Scriptures speak of persons heing the chosen, or the elect of God. Of this ignorance or inattention the op- posers of sovereign grace take the advantage ; and in order to perplex or prejudice their minds, produce Scripture instances of some who were elected, and nevertheless perished in their sins, as there is reason to think Saul and Judas did, and yet both of them were chosen of God- Hence it is inferred, that as some are lost who were elected, therefore election does not secure the salvation of those who are chosen, but is of such a nature as to leave their future happiness and final felicity entirely precarious. As such infer- ences as the above, at the first view, wear the ap- pearance of truth, it is no wonder that some gra- cious persons are indifferent about the doctrine. But the apostle exhorts Christians to give all dili- gence to make their calling and election sure, by being able to produce such evidences as may demonstrate their personal interest in Jehovah's choice: the knowledge of which, in the judg- ment of Jesus, is calculated to produce in his people greater pleasure than they ought to take from the evidence of devils being in subjection to them. To have hell vanquished must afford unutterable joy to those who wrestle with the powers of darkness; "notwithstanding in this re- joice not, that the spirits are subject unto you, (saiih the Lord,) but rather rejoice because your ON ELECTION. 63 names are written in heaven." Luke x. 20. For the relief of serious inquirers after the truth, it may be proper to observe, that by Election, in Scripture is sometimes intended God's setting apart, or choosing a people, to the enjoyment of peculiar external privileges; in that sense he chose the Jewish nation, and therefore they as a nation, not- withstanding their wickedness, are frequently call- ed the Lord's elect, or chosen people. Again, the Lord hath elected, or chosen particular persons to act in office capacity ; as Samuel, Saul, David, and many more under the Old Testament ; and Peter, James, Judas, and others, were chosen, or elected in like manner under the New. Hence Jesus said to his disciples, " Have not I chosen you twelve ? and one of you is a devil." But the election of grace, of which I am treat- ing, is of a different nature, and consists in God's choosing of persons in Christ Jesus, or setting them apart as in connexion with him, to salva- tion, through sanctification of the Spirit, and be- lief of the truth. Salvation was the end God had in view ; — to bring his chosen to the possession and enjoyment of salvation, not only as consist- ing in a deliverance from punishment, but from all iniquity. Therefore in the definition the apostle gives of the doctrine, sanctification by the Spirit, and a true faith, were what these per- sons were chosen to be the subjects of, through which only, salvation could be enjoyed. This choice was from the beginning, or ever the earth -h 64 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. was. They were not chosen, because they were viewed as holy, and therefore deserving to be dis- tinguished as God's favorites, on account of their obedience or personal purity, but that they should be holy. The great apostle, in his deep, but de- lightful epistle to the saints at Ephesus, treats of the important subject in so full, plain, and accu- rate a manner, as to answer almost every perti- nent query that can be made respecting the doc- trine. He begins with expressions of fervid affection and humble gratitude to its infinite Author, saying. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Q. 1. What hath he done ? A. Who hath blessed us. Q,. 2. With what hath he blessed us ? A. With all spiritual blessings. Q. 3. Where are those blessings deposited ? A. In Christ. Q,. 4. Where may seeking souls expect to find and enjoy them ? A. In heavenly places (or things.) Q,. 5. According to what does he proceed in the bestowment of such special privileges: is it owing to our choice of him ? A. No; but accordingas he hath chosen us in him. a. 6. When? A. Before the foundation of the world. Q,. 7. But did he choose us because we were holy, or because he foresaw we would be so ? A. No ; but that we should be holy. ON ELECTION. 65 Q. 8. Did he then intend that all such should T be made completely holy ? \ A. Yes, and without blame before him in love. Q,. 9. And is every thing aforesaid absolutely secured ? A. Yes, having predestinated us. Q. 10. Predestinated to what? A. Unto the adoption of children, Q. Jl. By, and to whom ? A. By Jesus Christ to himself. Q. 12. What is the source of such favors, or from whence do they flow ? A. The good pleasure of his will. Q. 13. In what does the whole terminate, or to what does it lead ? A. To the praise of the glory of his grace. Wherein he hath made us accepted in the Be- loved, in whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his grace. See Eph. i. 4th to the 12th, Again, the same inspired writer asserts, such were "chosen to salvation, through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth." 2 Thess. ii. 13» God kindly connected their final felicity and his own eternal glory, when he ordained them to eternal life. Acts xiii. 48. But though Judas was chosen to office, he was not chosen to holi- ness, for Jesus, when speaking to the disciples as his servants and true followers (Judas being pres- ent) he said, I speak not of you all. I know whom I have chosen. John xiii. 18. The names F 66 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. ^'of his chosen are written in heaven, and all such . are freed from condemnation. Who shall lay any- thing to the charge of God's elect ? Rom. viii. 33. : All this could not [with propriety] be said of the i Jewish nation, nor of Judas, and many more who have been chosen [merely] to office : besides, in- dividuals are called the elect, who could not bear rule in the church of God ; for a woman was not suffered to speak in the cliurch, nor to usurp au- • thority over the man, but was to be in silence. ; 1 Tim. ii. 12. Yet we read of an elect lady and her elect sister. 2 John i. 13. If God hath thus chosen, the end he had in view will certainly be accomplished, for saith Jesus, " AH that the Fath- er giveth me shall come unto me, and him that Cometh unto me I will in no wise cast out." " His people shall be willing in the day of his power," for having "loved them with an everlast- ing love, therefore with loving kindness will he draw them." No one instance can be given of God having chosen any people, person, or place, to that which was not actually accomplished. Did the Lord choose the Jewish nation to pecu- liar privileges? Yes, and in consequence of that choice they had the advantage of all other nations, and much every way. Samuel did actually prophesy, and Saul and David were really kings in Israel. Judas was actually num- bered with the apostles, and with them took part of the ministry to which he was elected. Moses was Israel's leader, and lawgiver, because he ON ELECTION. 67 was chosen by the Lord to such dignity. Aaron and his descendants were priests of the most high God, because they were elected by him to that office. So the Lord chose Jerusalem as the resi- dence of the ark, and the place where sacrifices shouhl be offered ; and thither the tribes of Israel actually repaired to worship, and adore him whose dwelling was in Zion. In no one instance did Jehovah choose in vain. The ends he had in view were ever accomplished. And if so, can there be any reason assigned why those, and those only who were chosen to the greatest bless- ings, should fall short of them ? But the founda- tion standeth sure, having this seal, the Lord knoweth them that are his. In every age "as many as were ordained to eternal life believed" "the election obtained it, but the rest were blind- ed" by " the god of this world, who blindeth the eyes of them who believe not." " So then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace, and if by grace, then it is no more of works, otherwise grace is no more grace." Rom. xi. 5, 6. Another stumbling-block in the way of many inquirers, next to the doctrine of election, is reprobation, which is generally [but improperly] considered as the counterpart of election, and re- lated to it as its direct opposite ; as a negative, is related to a positive idea. But if it be under- stood as the negative of election, is it not strange it should change its nature, and, in controversy, 68 DOCTRINAL DIFriCULTIES. become a positive idea ? And yet as such it has been [both] opposed and defended with great warmth ; for the adversaries of sovereign grace scarcely ever directly encounter the doctrine of election ; but artfully file off to reprobation, as if they were conscious [that] election was itself in- vulnerable, and could not possibly be reduced. But from the mountain of reprobation tfiey attack the doctrine intended to be demolished, and charge it with the most horrid consequences, too shock- ing to relate. These consequences the defend- ers of sovereign grace have repeatedly proved to be quite foreign to, and not in the least inferable from, the doctrine of God's sovereign choice of his people to grace and glory. But perhaps their defence of the doctrine of reprobation has not been equally successful. [And no wonder ; — they have unwarily admitted it to be the opposite of election ; and this admission] has been stumbling to many inquirers after truth, and encouraging to its opposers. Election or choice, indeed, implies a negative, or that some are not chosen ; which the Scripture calls the rest: this is readily allowed, but reprobation as mentioned in Scripture is never opposed to election. To the doctrine of election it does not seem related, but stands in a quite differ- ent situation in the system of scriptural divinity. 1. If reprobation conveyed the idea of non- election, by a person being reprobated, we should understand one not elected ; but how will such an idea comport with the apostle's reasoning, ON ELECTION. 69 when he says, "Know ye not that Jesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobates ?" 2 Cor.xv. 15. To suppose him to mean they were not elected if Christ was not in tliem, is supposing him to con- tradict his own experience, and oppose self-evident facts ; for there was a time when Christ was not in Paul himself; during which period he was ex- ceeding mad against those who professed the name of Jesus. But, says he, " it pleased God to re- veal his Son in me." Before this happy change took place he was in a state of reprobation, for Christ was not in him, and yet he was never in a stale of non-election, hut was one chosen in Christ before the world was. Again, he could not mean if Christ was not in them they were not elected, be- cause Christ is not naturally in his elect, as most of them know ; and [they] lament, when called by grace, that they lived without God and without Christ in the world ; therefore, during that period, they were reprohates, not having Christ in them ; neverthe- less they were the elect of God, of which their be- ing called by grace is a proof. From hence it ap- pears that reprobation is not the opposite of election. 2. That reprobation is not the opposite of elec- tion will appear evident, if it be considered that election is an act of divine sovereignty, arising merely from the will of God, without any fitness in creatures deserving to be so distinguished ; but reprobation, whenever the word is used in Scrip- ture, respects a comparative deficiency, or an es- sential defect in those who are reprobated- Eiec- 70 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. tion is the effect of, or entirely flows from the good pleasure of God's will in favor of the persons of his people ; but reprobation originates not merely from God's will, but from the natural contrariety there is between Jehovah's purity and their •pol- lution* 3. Reprobation in Scripture always stands op- posed to, and is the natural negative of, approba- tion, whether it respect the state of a person, the frame of his mind, or the nature of his actions. Hence, vile professors are compared to the alloy * If the distinction laid down, page 48, between the love of God as Natural and as Sovereign be borne in mind, it M'ill render even more clear, the point which the author is here discussing. Election is the choice which sover- eign love makes of the persons of such as shall be saved. But Reprobation is not the opposite of this; — it is God's natural aversion to the disposition (i. e. the unkoliness} of sinners, whether elect or not. And as God's natural hatred to the disposition of an impenitent sinner would be no proof that the person of the same sinner was not an object of his sovereign love, so, neither is the fact that a man is reprobate, any proof that he is not elect ; for as God " loved" Israel with a sovereign love, and yet " greatly abhorred" them with a wa^MraZ aversion, (Psal. Ixxviii. 59, comp. 62) and this love and abhorrence were not only compatible, but co-existent; so are the election and reprobation (i. e. disapproval ; see following sec- tion) of the same person compatible, and may be co- existent, and, therefore, one cannot be the opposite of the other. Ed. ON ELECTION. 71 or dross frequently mixed with metal, which on trial is found base or deficient in quality ; there- fore " reprobate silver shall men call them, be- cause the Lord has rejected them." Jer. vi. 30. So in the text before mentioned, " Know ye not that Christ is in you except ye be reprobates ?" the ai)ostle's obvious meaning is, that such are destitute of real worth. For, however splendid a profession be, yet without Christ, all will be found mere re- fuse at last ; therefore he puts them upon close ex- amination, lest they should be deceived by appear- ances, Thinking themselves something, while in fact they are nothing. Hence in the next verse he adds, "But I trust that ye shall know that we are not reprobates." 2 Cor. xiii. 5, 6 ; and in verse 7, he says, " Now I pray to God that ye do no evil, not that we should appear approved, but that ye should do that which is honest, though we be as repro- bates." Thus he considers reprobation and appro- bation as natural opposites. Again, men of corrupt minds are said to be ^^ reprobate concerning the faith," i. e- destitute of a true understanding of the truth. 2 Tim. iii. 8. And the "abominable and disobedient are unto every good work reprobate." Tit. i. 16. Agreeable, therefore, to this view of reprobation, those vile affections to which the Gentiles were given up, are called "a reprobate mind." Rom. i. 26, 28, 29. Meaning that their dispositions and conduct were odious, and could not possibly be approved of, either by God or good men. From the above considerations it evidently 72 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. appears, that election and reprobation are not in- separably connected, nor even so much as related as kindred ideas, and that reprobation does not in- tend an absolute appointment to eternal misery, for such may still find mercy as Paul did ; but that it is the awful opposite to divine approbation, whether it respect persons, principles, or proceed- ings. But some may reply. Though the term reproba- tion should be disused as relating to election, yet if the ideas be retained which were conveyed by it, the doctrine is not less exceptionable than before. True ; therefore, let us calmly consider whether those horrid ideas, which the opposers of election have always connected with the term reprobation, are, or are not, as foreign to the doctrine of election as the term itself. The most decent and sober opposers of the doctrine in question^generally charge it with implying three things: 1. An ap- pointment to inevitable destruction of those who are not elected ; therefore, 2. That the doctrine of election is injurious to those not included in it; and consequently, 8. Is a reflection on the justice or moral character of God. These reasons, it is confessed, are quite sufficient to justify a dissent from the doctrine, or an opposition to it, supposing them well founded. But whether these awful in- ferences are the genuine offspring of election or not will appear, if brought under impartial exami- nation. ON ELECTION. 73 1. Respecting the first objection, the question is, Whether the doctrine of election (supposing it a fact) be the cause of, or in the least influential up- on, an appointment of any creature to destruction ? That it was neither the cause nor the occasion of such an appointment is demonstrably evident from its very nature. It could not liave such a tendency, because election is an act absolutely sovereiijn, or a gracious act arising simply from Jehovah's will. But punishment does not arise from divine sover- eignty. If it did, it would be causeless; but God never punished (therefore never intended to do so) without a criminal cause in the creature. God does not punish for sin because it was his sovereign will ; but his very will to punish arises from the holiness of his nature and the equity of his govern- ment; therefore God's intention to punish arises from a distinct source from that out of which elec- tion springs. They are in their nature eternally distinct, as any acts of God can possibly be.* Such a charge, therefore, might as well be brought against creation as election. It seems very strange that any serious person should oppose the idea of God's decreeing to punish for sin, seeing he actually * These distinctions may be thus shown: — The *' source" of election is mercy ; Eph. ii. 4, 5. That of punishment is justice. Luke xxiii. 41. The "nature" of the two acts also is distinct ; — election is a gracious act ; Rom. xi. 5. Punishment is a righteous one ; Rom. iii. 5, Ed. G 74 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. does SO, which he could not, if it was an unrighte- ous thing in God to take vengeance. If it he right for the Lord to punish tiiose who are punislied by him, it could not be wrong to resolve to do so, un- less it be ivrorig to determine to do what is right. However, such a decree does not arise from elec- tion. What is opf)osite to election, is a mere nega- tion, or a leaving others in that state in which all men are viewed by the great Eternal when he chose his people : therefore, 2. The doctrine is not injurious to those not in- cluded in it ; for if election respected its objects as sinless, or simply considered as creatures formed of God, which some think, seeing the hap{>y an- gels and the person of Chri.^t were included in Jehovah's choice, those from among whom they were chosen could not be deemed punishahle, be- ing considerefl in their pure unfallen state ; there- fore election, if so considered, could not in the na- ture of things, be the cause or occasion of God's designing to punish any man. If the election of men be considered as a clioice of cnmiwaZ creatures^ or of creatures considered as in a sinful fallen Slate, in which light it is viewed by many, because the choice is unto salvation through sanctifcation of the spirit, (however, the different staling of the doc- trine is only a circumstance whicli does not alter the nature of the truth stated, for if it be thus con- sidered,) it unavoidably follows, that as those not included in the sovereign choice, were viewed by God as sinful when the choice was made; there- ON ELECTION. 75 fore the choice could not possibly make them sinful nor cause them to he viewed as criminals. It is singularly absurd to sui)[)ose the prescience of God, or his all-comprehending understanding, to he the fruit of his sovereign will; and yet this ab- surdity, gross as it is, attends the objection, which is the same as saying, if God had not elected some, he would never have known or tliougbt of the condition of others. As no injury is done to any man by the doctrine in question, therefore, 3. It is not contrary to, or an impeachment of, the moral character of God. In election there is no connivatice at sin implied. By it, sin in the chosen was not rendered less odious, nor justice partially administered in their favour, but a surety was graciously substituted in their stead, who bore their sins, and was wounded for their transgres- sions, and by whose obedience the law of God was magnified, and through his death impartial justice shone with tremendous lustre. Had the crimes of which the elect was guilty been transferred or im- puted to those who perish, in that case an exemption of the elect from punishment would have been unjust and injurious, because mercy shown to them would have heightened the misery of others. But as every one who perishes suffers only according to the demerit of his own personal sins, therefore to infer that the doctrine of election is detrimental to man, and unworthy of God, discovers either ^pi^- idble weakness, or powerful prejudice ; for such in- ferences seem as opposite to truth, decency and 76^ DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. common sense, as a man would appear to he, if he undertook to prove that God is cruel because he is kind, and that those have great cause to complain who were never injured. That the doctrine is not inimical to Christian experience, but of contrary tendency, will be shown in its proper place. What has been said I hope may tend to remove the ob- jections against it,"^ as a revealed truth of great im- *The following condensed view of the doctrine of election, may, perhaps, not be unacceptable to the young Christian. 1. There is a manifest difference among mankind in their moral and religious character ; — a difference which is not merely external, but apparently, radical and essen- tial : some are the subjects of real, vital piety, of which others are entirely destitute, 2. As every effect must originate in some cause, so this difference in men's characters is an effect of some cause, and the Scriptures attribute it to God ; Eph. ii. 3, 5. " We were by nature children of wrath even as others ; but God — hath quickened us." 3. As God is the author of this difference, he has, doubtless, in producing it, acted like an intelligent and wise being. But such a Being does not act till he has determined to act; and each act is part of a plan of ope- ration: therefore, before God produced this difference in men's characters, he determined to produce it, and the change produced, is part of his great plan of operations ; i. e. what he has done in time, he has resolved to do be- fore time began : he determined, then, to effect the very change he has effected, and in the very persons in whom UNION TO CHRIST. 77 portance, in consequence of which, Christ and his people were so connected that wiiat he did was im- putable to them. CHAPTER IV. UMOiV TO CHRIST. Though the Scriptures speali with remarkable plainness of the near relation subsisting between Christ and his churcli, in consequence of electing love, yet various stumbling-blocks are frequent- ly found in the way of [those who desire] clear views of that doctrine ; for the removal of he has effected it ; (Rom. viii. 29, 30,) and this determi- nation is election. From this it will be seen that election has absolutely no hearing upon any but the saved ; it does not touch, or at all regard others ; — no more than if they had not any being. It leaves them exactly as they were, and as they would have been if there had been no election at all. From an inspection of the passage just referred to, in connection with the above remarks, it will be seen, also, that so far from election securing the salvation of any, irrespective of character and piety, their character is one object regarded in their election ; and election secures that it shall be holy ; (Eph. i.4.) Election, as we have seen, was the determination that there should be a differ- ence in conduct and character between its objects and others ; and that they should be sanctified in spirit, by the belief of the truth. 2 Thes. ii. 13. 78 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. which, if God please to bless the attempt, let us now brie% consider, [that relation to Christ which is expressed by the title of the present chapter.] Various warm disputes have existed among the people of God about union to Christ, particu- larly as relating to its commencement, which is thought by some to have been from everlasting, and by others not till, or after believing. Though agreed in the main about its nature and duration, each side has been pretty free, and fertile in the invention of consequences, as arising from their opponents' sentiments, which [consequences,] per- haps, are equally abhorrent to both. On this ac- count, many sincere inquirers after truth have been greatly discouraged, wounded in their minds, and prevented making progress in religious attainments. Some are likewise perplexed and stumbled by a thii-d party, who, differing from the other about the nature of the union, therefore deny its durabil- ity^ and maintain that those who are in Christ to- day may ])ossibly be in hell to-morrow. Perhaps the doctrine of union with Christ may be of such a copious and complex nature, as to justify in some measure the sentiment of each, who viewing the sub- ject in detached parts only, therefore may conclude some things are opposite, which are, in fact, only distinct. However, so far as that may be the case with common Christians, an impartial survey, or review of ilie subject, may have a conciliating tendency; for which purpose it should be consid- ered, that union to Christ is of a threefold nature. UNION TO CHRIST. 79 which may (for the sake of keeping ideas distinct) be denominated, visible^ vital, and virtual. First ; By visible, is intended a credible profes- sion of Christ, joined with an apparent subjection to him, or an embracing his gospel, and obeying his laws. Where there appears love to Jesus, and subjection to him as a Saviour, and a Sovereign, we are bound to consider such persons as related to him, and to love them accordingly. The apostle, treating of the visible church as in union with Christ, founded on profession, says, We being many, are one body in Christ, and every one mem- bers one of another. Rom. xii. 5. And speaking of the churches of Judea, he adds, which were in Christ. Gal. i. 22. To be therefore in the church by a credible ])rofession, was called a being in Christ, as in 1 Cor. xii. 2. See Gal. iii. 27 ; I Cor. xii. 13. Yet it is evident that the apostle did not account all were true believers which were in Christ by profession, though he was bound in charity to hope thus of them all, till there was evidence to the contrary. The inspired penmen did not certainly know the gracious state of the persons they addressed, but had cheering hopes and distressing fears, respecting those to whom they ministered. See Epist. to Gal. Even Jesus, " who knew what was in man," generally, as a minister, addressed his own people by such terms as were descriptive of gracious dispositions; Matt, v. As many are in Christ only by a profession, Iiaving a name to live, and *tre dead, therefore 80 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. there is a striking pro])riety in the various ifs we meet with in Scripture, when promises and en- couragements are treated of, which ifs do not im- ply an uncertainty of a true believer's future hap- piness; but an uncertainty respecting who the persons are that have believed through grace. With what jealousy does Paul sf)eak of the Gala- tian churches, and of many in that of Corinth ; and with what caution does Peter mention one whom he greatly valued, "Sylvanus, a faithful brother, as I suppose." 2 Pet. v. 12. The visible kingdom of Christ is compared to a net which en- closeth divers kinds: but the Lord, who searcheth the heart, will take care of the good, and cast the bad away. Then many who were visibly in con- nexion with Christ, who ate and drank in his presence, who were the children of the kingdom, and visible members of his body, the church, will be cast out ; so that those who are found fruitless branches in Christ, will be broken off, and burned with unquenchable fire. Therefore it is granted that many who are in Christ, in [this] sense, [i. e. visibly,] may notwithstanding lift up their eyes in hell, being in torment. Secondly ; there is a vital union, or a divine connexion between Christ and his people, which takes place at regeneration, when the soul is made to hear the voice of the Son of God and live ; for the Son quickeneth whom he will. Hence the apostle says, " I live ; yet not I, but Christ which liveth in me." To live implies three things, UNION TO CHRIST. 8 1 all whicl), in a spiritual sense, every true Christian is the subject of, viz.; sensation, animation, PRESERVATION. 1. Sensation. They feel the burden of guilt, and are sensible of the plague of their own hearts. They are convinced of their wants and weakness, and are conscious of being in a condition both mean and miserable. They see their own deform- ity and Jehovah's beauty. Their ears are open to receive instruction ; and the voice of God in his word, whether terrific or tender, makes deep and durable impressions on their minds. They have a taste for the things of religion, after which they hunger and thirst. To them Christ is precious: his name is an ointment [)oured forth, his beauty is as the olive-tree, and his smell as Lebanon ; yea, he is altogether lovely. All their spiritual sensations, whether painful orpleasurable, are in consequence, o^ living union w'\th Jesus; for })rior to its com- mencement they were dead in sin, and destitute of every holy emotion and perception. 2. Animation. Christian activity is entirely owing to Christ's animative influence. Through his Spirit and all-sufficient grace, they serve with pleasiu*e, or suffer with patience ; they strive and war against sin, and wrestle with princij>alities and powers, over all which they are more than conquerors through him who hath loved them. Yea, they can do all things through Christ strengthening them, and without him they can do nothing. 82 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. 3. Preservation. The princi|)le of animation ever discovers an inclination to preserve its connex- ion with that which is animated by it : this is obvi- ous not only in rational life, but even in animal likewise. So, Christ has always discovered an en- tire, infinite inclination to keep and preserve his people in connexion with himself. He influences theni to love, and labor for the meat which perish- eth not. He alarms their fears that they may es- cape danger, and strengthens their faith that they may lay hold of eternal life, secures their love by fresh discoveries of divine heauiies, and the suita- bleness of celestial objects to heaven-horn souls. Thus he draivs them in the paths of duty by the bands of love, and by the cords of a man. He is the author of then- preservation^ in such a way as to prevent presumption, and secure their attention to appointed means, which Divine wisdom has con- nected with the desired end. He says he never will leave them, but will be with them always to the end of the world ; and writes his law in their hearts, that they might not finally depart from him. He saves them, therefore, not contrary to \he\Y indination^ but with their /ree consent, and fervent desire. He that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit ; 1 Cor. vi. 17. Between Jesus and them, there is a oneness in perception, affection, in- terest, and end. As they are precious to him, so he is precious to them ; the chief among ten thousand, and altogether lovely. His interest is theirs, and theirs is his. He rejoiceth in the pros- UNION TO CHSIST. 83 perity of his people, and they esteem Jerusalem, i. e. his cause on earth, above their chief joy ; his revealed designs correspond with their real desires. The destruction of sin and the perfection of purity they long for. He gave his life for them, neither do they count theirs too dear to sacrifice on his behalf; their life therefore is in their hand, ready to be delivered up at their Saviour's call. They rejoice in Jesus on account of his mediatorial obe- dience, not only as it is their security from con- demnation, but as it does infinite honour to Heaven's righteous law. What Christ has done, intentionally centres, and will ultimately termi- nate, in the vindication of God's moral govern- ment, and the eternal display of Jehovah's essen- tial perfections, in all their native beauty, and infinite excellency, grandeur, and glory, that God) to whom sinners have an aversion, may appear and be acknowledged, not only by angels, but by men, as all in all. As influenced by grace, the true believer says, " Oh, how I love thy law !" "I delight in the law of God after the inward man." Jehovah he admires and adores ; and when he takes a solemn view of the great Eternal, whose glory dazzles angelic eyes, he is astonished, confounded, and lost, in pleasing tvonder. He sinks into profound contempt of himself, and feels keen reflections on his criminal want of affection to, and departures from a Being so infinitely de- serving the supreme love of men and angels. But on the revival of hope, with humble reverence, 84 DOCTRI.XAL DIFFICULTIES. and holy rapture, he sings, " The Lord is my por- tion, saith my soul. He is my rock and fortress, and my deliverer, my God, my strength, my buckler, my salvation, and my high tower. In his presence is fulness of joy, at his right hand are pleasures for evermore. Then shall I be satisfied, when I awake in his likeness." Though conscious of meanness and demerit, his language now is, "Will he plead against me with his great power? No, but he will put strength into me." " I know whom I have believed. He hath said. My grace shall be sufficient for thee, my strength is made perfect in weakness. Tlie Lord will i)reserve me unto his heavenly kingdom, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen." As such souls freely give themselves unto the Lord, so he receives them graciously, and rejoiceth in them as Iiis spouse, his property, and portion; it is his will, and their desire to be like him, and with him forever; and for them to die is gain. Therefore, though siioals of professors perish, none who are possessors of his grace ever shall. Their internal life is eternal in its duration ; for thus saith the Lord, " I give unto my sheep eter- nal life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any pluck them out of my hand." John x. 28. "He that believeth on him is not condemned." John iii. 18. "There is therefore now no condem- nation to them that are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Si)irit." Rom. viii. 1. As there is no condemnation to such nowy UNION TO CHRIST. 85 there never shall be any. "Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth my word and believeth, shall not con^.e into condemnation, but is passed from death unto life. John v. 24. Whoso be- lieveth on him, shall not perish, but have eternal life. John iii. 15, 16. They shall never die ; though they were dead, yet shall they live. John xi. 25. Who shall separate them from the love of Christ? Rom. viii. 35. Whose Spirit is in them as a well of water springing up into everlasting life. John iv. 14. He that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life" Those, therefore, who are vitally united to Christ, cannot lose their spiritual life while he maintains his own ; for he hath said, "Because I live ye shall live also." Being bought by his pre- cious blood, and kept by almighty power, they therefore may conclude with the apostle, "That when Christ, who is their life, shall appear, they shall also appear with him in glory." There is, therefore, no real contradiction in the declarations in Scri])ture, though they may to some appear opposite, respecting the Jinal state of those who are united to Christ ; for salvation is not inseparably connected with a visible, but with a vital union to the Son of God. Those who per- ish never were spiritually in Christ: he was never the home of their hearts. They never approved of him, nor he of them ; therefore he will say to all that shall be doomed to destruction, I never knew you. Though they may have been among the 86 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. saints, yet such were never of them ; but of a con- trary character all the wliile. Hence of apostates the apostle thus speaks: "They went out from us, but they were not of us, for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us ; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that they were not all of us, but ye have an unction from the Holy One" &c. 1 John ii. 19, 20. Thus it appears, that a visible and a vital union to Christ are very distinct ; and yet they are not op- posites, for a profession of Christ cannot be deemed contrary to a possession of him. Thirdly, Vital union is distinct from virtual, though one is not contrary or opposite to the other. By virtual union with Christ, is intended a real connexion subsisting between him and the elect of God considered simply as such. That there was such a connexion antecedent to vital union, is evi- dent from the following considerations. They were chosen in Christ, and given to him ; in covenant he represented them as a federal head. He became a surety for them, and on their behalf was made under the law, in consequence of which there was a legal connexion of union established between him and them. The substitution of his person under the law in their stead, was the ground of the imputation of their sins to him, and of his obedience for them. What he did and en- dured, would have had no efficacy in their favour, had they not been personally interested in him. Their sins could not have been done away by the UNION TO CHRIST. 87 sacrifice of himself, had he not given himself /or them in particular or died in their stead. But as their kinsman-Redeemer, he ransomed them from death, and as the Head of the church, he became the Saviour of the body. Thus was he related to his chosen, as their head of representation ; and, as their surety, by his gracious engagements and condescending substitution of his person [to endure the penalties of the law] in their place, and by his performing for them what was required of them, he became the Lord their righteousness, and by his death he procured on their behalf an eternal exemption from deserved punishment, and a legal title to everlasting bliss. In consequence of tliis union, the elect were intrusted to his care, and were preserved in Christ Jesus, and, therefore, called to be saints. By virtue of the aforesaid con- nexion, they are said to be his sheep, whom he must bring ; for of all that the Father hath given him, he will lose none : and from thence ariseth the propriety of the apostle's language in Eph. ii.4, 6: ** God who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,evenivhenwe were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, and hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus." Now as this virtual union docs not supersede vital, or render it unnecessary, but is the secret source from whence it flows, why then should the godly quarrel one with another about what is so evi- dently consistent ? Though fruit be only found in the branches, yet the root is surely not unprofi- 88 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. table, seeing from thence the sap of the tree pro- ceeds. According to this simile we may observe, what the Scripture calls bringing forth fruit unto God, can only be expected among professors of religion, who are in Christ as visible branches. But even amongst them, will no fruit be found without sap or living nourishment ; and there can be no vital nourishment, but in consequence of union with the root. As none ever imagine there is no connexion between the i-oot and branches of a tree till blossoms appear, why then should any think there is no connexion between Christ the root of the righteous, and his people, before the ap- pearance of grace ? It is owing to the appearance of gracious dispositions, that a relation to Christ is discovered, or claimable by any person what- ever: nevertheless, the union or relation in the last sense in which we have been speaking, does not then commence. If there was no previous secret connexion with Christ, from whence did grace proceed to the soul? It must have a source or original cause. The apostle observes all spiritual blessings were given us in Christ. Eph. i. 3. If Christ was intrusted with all spiritual blessings to communicate to his people, then no spiritual bless- ing is ever possessed, but what flows from him ; and if so, there must be a prior cormexion w^ith him. Believers have reason gratefully to ac- knowledge that they all have received out of his fulness, grace for grace. John i. J 6. To the hesi- tating soul we would recommend a close consider- UNION TO CHRIST. 89 ation of the apostle's query; "What hast thou, that thou didst uot receive:" 1 Cor. iv. 7. The doctrine of union between Christ and his church is of a nature so copious, that no one meta- phor can properly represent it ; therefore in the Scriptures we meet with various similitudes, tend- ing to illustrate the important subject. Christ is frequently compared to a foundation, on which his people are built ; but that conveying only the idea of support, therefore he is compared to a root, by which the idea of injluence is hkewise illustra- ted. But though branches are influenced, and rendered fruitful, in consequence of conveyed nourishment, yet Christian activity is not thereby properly represented : to supply this defect, Christ and his people are farther illustrated by the union subsisting between head and memhers. But though the idea of activity is thereby conveyed, there is still a material defect, for the relation be- tween these is quite involuntary. Had it been/ otherwise, the head might possibly have chosen better feet, cr better hands ; and had they been the subjects of distinct volition, they would, probably, have chosen to have been in union with a better head: theretore to supply the deficiency of the above simile, and to include the idea of mutual choice and social endearments, Christ and his church are compared to husband and wife. If then we are in such near and close connexion with the blessed Jesus, as the Scriptures assert, and, by so many significant similitudes, illustrate his own H 90 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. people to be, let us frequently think of, and bless God for, that sovereign and inseparable love whicji constituted the relation. It is all of God, as is devoutly acknowledged by that sweet singer in our British Israel, the late Dr. Watts, who of the Father's love and choice thus speaks : Christ be my first elect, he said, Then chose our souls in Christ our Head ; Nor shall our souls be thence remov'd, Till he forgets his first belov'd. CHAPTER V. rp:lation to god. As there are unhappy differences among the professors of religion about union to Christ, so in like manner they are subject to cast stumbling- blocks in each other's way respecting relation to God. For the removal of these, and the purpose of reconciliation, let us consider on what, relation to God is founded. That relation in which God's people stand unto himself, distinct from others, according to the Scripture, arises from adoption and regeneration. Adoption is a taking those into the relation of sons, and treating them as such, who are not so by nature. Now God's people were all by nature aliens ; but, by adopting grace, [they] were by him considered as his children. RELATION TO GOD. 91 Again, His people are all his children hy hirth; being born again, they possess or partake of his nature, as it consists in righteousness and true holiness, and so bear his image. Adoption con- stitutes relation, but does not convey likeness of nature; but regeneration does both. Adoption is before, or antecedent to regeneration, for there is no propriety in supposing those are made sons by adoption who are so by birth. No man ever adopted his own son ; those who are sons by na- ture, need not to he made sons by adoption. Though the y)ersons who are regenerated were adopted, yet they were not adopted as regenerate, but when they were in a stale of alienation from God. In which state all men are by nature, as the descendants of an apostate head. Adoption is therefore the taking those into the relation of children, who are not so by nature, or reckoning, or accounting those sons, who are not, [as yet, such] by regeneration. Relation by adoption is, therefore, quite distinct from sonship arising from regeneration, or a being generated, and born anew ; and accordingly we find it treated of as a separate subject in the word of God. Adoption is an act of God's sovereign ivill, according to Eph. i. 5, 6. "Having predestinated us unto the adop- tion of children by Jesus Christ to himself, accord- ing to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise and glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved." Regeneration is the work of his power, it is a manifest change of soul 92 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. produced by his Holy Spirit. "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us by the washing of regen- eration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost." Tit. iii. 5. The people of God, considered as children by adoption, were the subjects of redemption. Being, through sin, in a state of distance and dreadful captivity, Christ gave his life a ransom for them. " He died, the just for the unjust, that he might bring thein to God." Hence those who were sometime afar off are made nigh by the blood of his Son. It was therefore expedient that Christ should die for the people, and gather to- gether in one the children of God that were scat- tered abroad. John xi. 50, 52. For it became him for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings. Heb. ii. 10. They were not redeemed, considered as saints, but as sinney-s ; not redeemed as children, by regeneration, but as sons by adop- tion; and of them, as such, Christ will at last say, "Father, here am I and the children which thou hast given me." The application of redeeming love, and the possession of the Redeemer's pur- chase is not enjoyed, nor by them desired till re- newed in the spirit of their minds; but being God's adopted sons, therefore in his account they were entitled to them ; and because they were sons, the Spirit of Christ is sent into their hearts, crying, Abba, Father. It is owing to the RELATION TO GOD. 93 Spirit of adoption, or the Holy Ghost, bearing witness to their relationship as the children of God, that they are delivered from that bondage and fear which would otherwise overwhelm them, in consequence of a sight and sense of critninal distance from God, and unlikeness to him. Rom. viii. 15, 17. The bodies of God's l)eople were included in the act of adoption, and with their souls were given to Christ, and bought by him ; "Ye are bouglit with a price, wherefore glorify God in your bodies, — which are his. But though the members of the body are instru- ments of righteousness unto holiness, in conse- quence of a person being renewed in the spirit of his mind, yet while in this life the bodies of the saints have no })eculiar marks of divine sonship, but are subject to vanity, bondage, and corruption. The privileges of adoption, therefore, as relating to them, will not be enjoyed till the resurrection, for the bodies o{ all men through sin are the seat of n)isery ; and not only bodies in general, but ourselves also, which have the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of the body." Rom. viii. 23. Sonship by adoption is not contrary to, nor does it render relationship to God by regeneration, unnecessary; there is as much need of a meetness for heaven as of a title to it. In order to consummate happiness, it is as neces- sary to have a disposition, or taste, for pure and refined pleasure, as it is to be^elivered from pain. 94 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. Therefore, except a man be born again, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God, he cannot see it in its nature, beauty, and spiritual glory, for the nat- ural man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. Hence (says Christ) ye must be born again. The doctrine of adoption is supporting to the believer's hope, even when he loathes and bemoans himself on the account of transgressions, for the very name Jesus (a Sa- viour) was given to hnmanuel, because he shoidd save his people from their sins. Matth. i. 21. But considered as born again, they are not denomi- nated sinners, but saints, for he that is born of God sinneth net. Sin is not his occupation. By adoption God's people were in a point of relation made near to him, as resj.iecting their persons. By regeneration they become followers of him as dear children, through their being the subjects of gracious principles and holy dispositions. To conclude ; as sonsljip amongst men arises from adoption and likewise from natural descent, or generation ; the Lord, therefore, more fully to express his love to his people, and the ground of their claim or title to heavenly things, has been pleased to discover himself as their Father under both considerations ; which if properly attended to by the household of faith, their differences would in some measure subside, and their diffi- culties in some degree diminish ; for according to the scriptural account of relation to God, they RELATION TO GOD. 95 are most certainly right who say, that by regen- eration or heavenly birth the people of God are denominated sons in a proper sense, and in which sense they were not his children before, for we are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus; and if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. But those who heartily subscribe to this truth, may surely, without offence, be allowed to say, that by adoption they ivere constituted sons before believing ; for none are denominated be- lievers till born of God, and it would be absurd to suppose they were not till then adopted. Equally absurd as to suppose Adam adopted Abel, or that it is necessary for his majesty to adopt the prince of Wales. When the Scriptures treat 07ily of men's relation to God, it is then attributed to adop- tion ; or the gracious act of Jehovah's will towards them ; which does not imply, but is dis- tinct from, his powerful influences in" and upon them. But when likeness and relation to God are jointly considered, an heavenly birth is then in- tended or included. For the Holy Spirit's opera- tions in the souls of men are illustrated by natural generation ; because, such are thereby made par- takers of the Divine image, as it consisteth in righteousness and true holiness. The considera- tion of these things, it is hoped, may tend to reconcile the minds of some of the people of God, and prevent their falling out by the way. 96 DOCTRINAL DimcULTIES, CHAPTER VI. THE DOCTRINE Or ATONEMENT. This important truth is attended with divers difficulties, which are perplexing to weak Chris- tians, the removal of which calls for serious at- tention to its nature and necessity. Atonement signifies reconciliation, or appeasii]g of anger ; to atone is to harmonize or bring parties to an agree- ment that were at variance, or to remove that distance and disaffection which have subsisted between parties offended, so as to be at one again, or brought into a state of friendship, amity, and good will. The atonement under present consid- eration, is that by, or on the account of, which God is pacified towards, or pardons the sins of, his people. Various ideas are included in the term, as used in Scripture, but they are all of a kindred nature, and adhere to the important doctrine, as their central point, tending to explain its natural origin and efficacy. In order to obtain a distinct view of the subject, it may be proper to observe. First ; It supposes the party to have been justly injured [or offended] to whom satisfaction is due. This was in fact the case in respect of God. Men, all men, are become enemies to him without any reason which can possibly exculpate them from blame. His law, which men have broken, was in every re- spect reasonable and right. His authority, though THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 07 indisputably tlie highest and best founded, is treated by man with the greatest contempt. The moral beauty and excellency of God is become disgu:?ttul to his rebellious creatures. As Jehovah is the first, the best, and most worthy of all beings, it is fit he should value and esteem his own glory in proportion to its worth, which is infinitely njore excellent and more dear to him than all creatures in heaven and earth. But man has set up his own honor and happiness in opposition to God's, and (as it were) deifies himself, and debases Je- liovah, to whom he pays no further regard than he apprehends will terminate in his own advan- tage. God's anger is righteous displeasure, for men have hated him without a cause; there was nothing in his nature, character, or commands, with which men could be justly displeased. God never did any thing to provoke his creatures to revolt ; if he had, he would have been under obli- gation to have made satisfaction to man for the injury done him, in order to an honorable recon- ciliation, that man might be just, and the justifier of God, which is shocking to suppose: therefore. Secondly : The atonement supposes the offend- ing party, man, to have been justly deserving punishment, and exposed to misery. If he was not exposed to misery, there could have been no need of the exercise of mercy ; and if he was the real oflTender, something was needful to atone for the offence, in order to a restoration of friendship between him and his Creator. There is a preva- I yb DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. lent conviction attending guilt, of the necessity of something to reccmmend to and pacify offended Deity. It is not against atonement that men are naturally prejudiced ; but it is only that of God's providing to which they have an enmity and aversion. "Wherewith shall I come before the Lord, and bow myself before the most high God?" is the common and grand inquiry of a guilty mind. It is not a bowing before him, either in a way of submission, confession, supplication, or obedience, that will satisfy for past offences, but something that has worth and efficacy to alone for the sin of the soul, in order to an acceptable coming to, and bowing before the most high God: therefore, "thousands of rams, ten thousand of rivers of oil," and even " the first-born of the body," is thought of for the purpose of pleasing an offended God. "He hath shown thee, O rnan !" (in his word,) " what is good" for the paci- fication of Divine justice, and what he recjuires of thee, as a grateful return for the inestimable favor.. Mic. vi. 6, 7, 8. Not all created good (was it at the sinner's disposal) could compensate for the injury done to Jehovah's righteous law and equitable government, because it bears no proportion to an infinite evil ; therefore, the wis- dom of men and angels could never have pointed out a method for the exercise of mercy, consistent with the natural rights of justice and truth. But God, through infinite wisdom and sovereign love, has made a gracious proclamation in favor of THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 99 criminal man, saying, "Deliver his soul from going down to the pit, I have found a ransom" or an atonement: this was entirely a new procedure, the effect of a new and well-ordered covenant, according to his eternal purpose, wiiich he pur- posed in Christ Jesus our Lord. Tiiere was noth- ing in God's law, nothing in the original constitu- tion of things, nor any known property in Deity, from whence it could be inferred, that mercy would ever be shown to man, or friendship be restored between him and his justly offended Sovereign. The gracious intention was hid in God. Eph. iii.9. Yea, had an intimation been given of the kind design, the nature of atonement is such that created wisdom could never have guessed how^ or by whom it could be accomplished. For, 1. The person undertaking to atone, must have been able to offer to God that which was infinite in its worth and value. 2. [He must have the nature of those whom his atonement is to benefit; i. e. he must] be man, capable of obeying the law, and bearing its tre- mendous curse ; [and this] without personal and perpetual destruction. 3. He who atones for another's crimes must himself be innocent, otherwise an atonement would be needful on his own account; and there- fore, whatever he might do or endure for the pur- pose of reconciliation, could not properly be im- puted to, or benefit, any other guilty person. But among men, where could perfect innocence be 100 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. found, seeing the whole world is become guilty before God ? But supposing such a one could have been found, an atonement would not have ap- peared possible, because, 4. Equity cannot allow an innocent person to suffer punishment. It is contrary to the natural rule of right ; penal suffering cannot be inflicted but in consequence of guilt: therefore he that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they are both an abomination to the Lord. Prov. xvii. 15. And shall not the Judge of all the earth do right ? It is not possible he should do that which is abhorrent to his nature, and abominable in his sight ; therefore, as a God of equity he cannot clear the guilty, nor punish the innocent. Again, 5. He who is supposed to endure vicarious punishment, or suffer in the room and stead of another, must stand in such prior relation to or union with him, on whose behalf he is punished, as is necessary to support the delinquent's claim to an equitable discharge. But where could such a friend be found, standing judicially related to miserable man, to act as his surety, or as a day's- man, between him and his God, and lay his hand upon them both? Job ix. 33. xvii. 3. But on a supposition such a friend could have been pointed out, who was allowedly one in law with the sinner, yet he could not die, or suffer in his stead, though even desirous of it, because. THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 101 6. No creature lias power or authority over his own life, to lay it down when he pleases, nor even to suffer rriutilation on hehalf of his dearest friend ; for his life and his limbs are at the sole and only disposal of God, in whom we all live and move, and from whom we have our being. From the above, and similar considerations, it appears, that the natin-e of sin, and the condition of men, were such as totally to preclude every ray of hope, yea, every idea of the possibility of an atonement being made, or a reconciliation accom- plished. But in the glorious gospel, God has opened a door of hope for lost sinners. He has graciously provided and revealed a method of salvation, which finite wisdom could never have deemed possible, a contrivance wherein he hath abounded towards us in all wisdom and prudence. Eph. i. 8. For every difficulty vanishes when the glorious Immanuel is viewed as the atoning priest and bleeding victim.* Here is infinite worth, value * Let us examine the preceding numbered paragraphs in the light of Scripture ; and we shall perhaps see more fully what was the meaning of our author, and what is Scripture truth on the subject which he discusses. He says, 1. '* He who would atone must offer what is of infinite value." The blood of bulls and lambs cannot atone, there- fore he says " lo i come." Now why ? that he might do what they could not : — " he taketh away the first to establish the second." He came to " take away sin by the sacrifice of himself." See Heb. x. 4 — 10.— ix. 26. 102 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. and virtue, infinite ability to obey the precepts of the law, and endure its awful penalty, without sustaining the loss of final felicity. He was holy, harmless and separate from sinners. But that he 2. " He must be man." And accordingly " He took not on him the nature of angels ; but he took on him the seed of Abraham." " The word was made flesh." "He must be able to bear the curse without destruction.'' And we read, " He was raised for our justification" after being " delivered for our offences," i. e. his resurrection evinced that his sacrifice was sufficient and accepted, and that justice had no further claims; and hence " Christ being raised , dieth no more ; death hath no more dominion over him," and we are " begotten again to a lively hope of an incorruptible inheritance by his resurrection from the dead." See Heb. ii. 16. John i. 14. Rom. iv. 25. vi. 9. 1 Pet. i. 3. " He must be innocent." And he was so. His blood was as that " of a lamb without blemish and without spot." He was just such a High Priest as our case required — "holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sin- ners." Hence "he needed not," as the Leviticai priests, " to off"er daily, first for his own sins, and then for those of the people." 1 Pet. i. 19. Heb. vii. 26. 27. 4. " It is inequitable that an innocent person should suffer punishment;" and it was not, strictly speaking, pM»- ishment which Jesus did endure. " But it became him by whom and for whom are all things, to make the Captain of our salvation perfect ihvovigh. sufferings" and this;was done without iniquity, "for he gave his life a ransom." It was not " taken from him ; but he laid it down of himself;^* and had a right to do so ; being himself " the Prince THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 103 might legally suffer, the just for the unjust, he who knew no sin was made sin for us. The Lord laid on him the iniquity of us all, which he hore in hi-s own body on the tree, when he made his soul an offering for sin. Thus, through imputation, he was numbered with transgressors, and bore the sins of many, which he put away by the sacrifice of himself. What he did and endured in the room and stead of ins people, was righteously placed to their account. He being graciously substituted in their stead, being their surety, made under the law, that he might redeem them from the curse of the law, being made a curse for them. He, therefore? kindly gave his life a ransom for his people, for he had authority and power to lay down his life, and power to take it up again. This commandment, says he, I received of my father. His propitiatory of life." See above under 6. ' Heb. ii. 10. Matt. xx. 28. John V. 2(3. 5. " To render equitable the delinquent's discharge, he who suffers vicariously must have previously sustained a relation to him." Such a relation existed, and was recognized, and the promise of discharge to the delin- quents was given ; and it was based on the recog- nised existence of this relation. "As for thee also by the blood of THY COVENANT I havc sent forth thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water." Zech. Ix. 11. 6. " No creature has power or authority over his own life, &c." But the Messiah is not a creature : he is "over all, God blessed for ever," "The second man is THE LORD from heaven." Rom. ix. 5. 1 Cor. xv. 47. Ed. 104 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. death was according to the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, and agreeable to the everlasting covenant, and therefore with his full approbation and free consent ; for the counsel of peace was between them both, (which will ever continue) and his delights were with the sons of men. Christ's atonement was illustrated by the various atonements under the law, [and was the central point of them.] The respective victims were with- out blemish ; were the property of the persons on whose account they were to be offered ; the crimes they were designed to expiate and atone for, were first solemnly confessed over them, and then as hav- ing sin placed on or transferred to them, they were offered up as the sinner's substitute, in consequence of which temporary forgiveness was obtained ; for these were only shadows of good things to come, and were offered year by year continually, but could never make the comers thereunto perfect, or take away sin as pertaining to the conscience. The law could make nothing perfect, but the bring- ing in of a better hope did : see Heb. x. Atonement is a declaration of divine righteousness, and a vin- dication of Jehovah's justice in condemning and punishing for sin ; therefore the act of Phineas, in taking vengeance in behalf of God on daring of- fenders, is called an atonement for the congrega- tion. Atonement is designed as a covering of the guilty soul ; thereby their iniquities are covered^ and their transgressions are forgiven. When the THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 105 congregation was numbered, it was enjoined on every man to give to the Lord a ransom for his soul ; the rich were not to give more than half a shekel,* nor the poor less ; which was called atone- ment money, as thereby atonement was made for their souls. In consequence of which price, they were covered from the plague to which they were liable. See Exod. xxx. 12, 16. So Jesus gave liimself a ransom for many : his people were bought with a price, not with silver or gold, but with the precious blood of the Son of God, in whom we hav« redemption, even the forgiveness of sins. By the blessed Jesus, the purity of God's law was fully approved and eternally preserved, its righteous claims established and fully confirmed ; its tremen- dous curse was by him endured, and his people exempted from wrath to come. In him mercy and truth are met together, righteousness and peace have kissed each other. He is the true antitype of the mercy-seat, whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood. The seat of mercy, where Deity ai)peared propitious, was the cover of, and supported by the ark, which con- tained and preserved the holy law which men had violated, denoting that the glory of God's righteous government must be secured before pardoning mercy could be discovered. To deny the glory and equity of God's law, by which sinners are con- * A Utile over twenty-five cents, and so within the com- .pass of the poor. 106 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. demned, antecedent to the gospel, is to iinderm ine the foundation of mercy, and destroy the pillars which support the throne of rich, reigning grace. The blood of atonement, sprinkled annually on the mercy-seat by the high priest, was an acknowledg- ment of Israel's guilt, and Jehovah's just authority ; and likewise of their absolute dependence on his voluntary mercy, richly dispensed and gloriously dis- played, consistent with his infinite hatred to sin and inflexible regard to impartial justice and puni- tive equity. Some represent the atonement of Christ as un- necessary in order to the pardon of sin, the remis- sion of which is, by them, considered as an act of divine clemency, without respect had to any merit attending the sufferings of Christ in the stead of those whose transgressions are forgiven. By this many have been perplexed, seeing such a repre- sentation and view of things evidently tends to jessen the odious nature of sin, tarnish the lustre of Jehovah's character, and diminish the believer's obligation to Jesus. Vie therefore shall consider, 1. It is undeniable that a consciousness of sin is attended with a fear of punishment in those who are not favored with a divine revelation. Hence the apostle, speaking of the heathen world, says? *' Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death." Rom. i. 32. But if punishment be not necessarily connected with transgression, how could the dread of suffering, and a conviction of the righteousxie&s THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 107 of God in taking vengeance, be so deeply engraven on tiie hearts of those who did not know the will and determination of God, except as inferred from the natural obligation his creatures are under to glorify him as their Creator? No creature can possibly know what originates in, or is dependent upon, the sovereign will of God, without a divine revelation , but as the punisliment of sin can be known where a revelation \s not [possessed], there- fore the punishment of sin arises not from divine sovereignty, but from the essential purity, dignity and rectitude of Jehovah's nature : [and hence] there was a necessity for Christ, as the surety, to endure the penalty, in order to his people's enjoy- ing a pardon ; for sin is so abominable in God's sight, so contrary to his pure nature, that punish- ment for it cannot be dispensed with ; a sinner, as such, cannot be safe. Hence there was a necessity for Jesus the Saviour to put away sin, by the sac- rifice of himself, to endure the curse, that his peo- ple might be exempted from sin's demerit, enjoy heavenly blessings, and wear the celestial crown. 2. Through the sufferings of Christ the essential righteousness of God is discovered, and his equity in acquitting the believer is thereby evidenced, and on that basis eternally established. It is Jesus Christ as a Redeemer, " whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past," (i. e. the sins of the Old Testament saints,) "through the forbearance of God: to 108 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. declare, I say, at this time, his righteousness, that he might be just and the justifier of him that be- lieveth in Jesus." Rom. iii. 25, 26. If God could with equity have pardoned sin, and justified crim- inals by an act of sovereign clemency, without an atonement, the death of Jesus did not render the sinner's acquittal just and righteous, which the apostle asserts. But as the equity of God in justi- fying the ungodly, depends upon the Saviour's sufferings, therefore without his sufferings there could have been no pardon of sin granted ; for " all his ways are judgment, a God of truth, and with- out iniquity, just and right is he." Deut. xxxii. 4. When \ve say, God could not pardon sin without an atonement, or that "without shedding of blood there is no remission," a limitation of Jehovah's power is not intended, nor is it from thence infera- ble ; for pardon and justification are not produc- tions of Divine power, but are acts of his will. Besides, God cannot do what is improper. He cannot lie, he cannot deny himself; and of iniquity he says, " I cannot away with it ;" not owing to a deficiency in power, but the perfection of his purity and rectitude of his nature. 3. God's gift of his Son to die for us, is always, in Scripture, admired as the greatest and most astonishing instance of his love to sinners, and considered as a blessing superior to any other cc^i- ferred on his people. Hence the apostle infers, " if God spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not, with him, freely give us THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 309 all things ?" Rom. viii. 32. But if sinners could have been made happy without Jesus, if there was no real necessity for his death, the gift of Christ, by such an awful supposition, is diminished in its value, and the favor sinks into the num'jer of non-essen- tials in point of salvation and eternal felicity. 4. If Divine justice could have dispensed with the punishment of sin, Christ was so precious to his righteous Father, and so entirely loved by him, that it is natural to suppose he would have been spared ; those agonizing sorrows and excruciating pains, under which he groaned and died, would not have been, without necessity, inflicted upon the darling of heaven. But as sin was placed to his account, it ])leased the Father to bruise him, and put him to grief; though he pleaded to have the cup removed if possible, yet he s[)ared him not. Now as in every other thing the Father heard him always, may we not from thence conclude, it was impossible for the connexion between sin and suffering to be broken ? Who can attend to the tremendous language of a sin-avenging God, say- ing, " Awake, O sword, against the man that is my fellow," smite him ; or seriously reflect on the dole- ful groans and bloody sufferings of the Son of God, in the garden, and on the cross; and calmly con- chide there was no necessity for any thing of that nature. 5. Those who are redeemed from sin, and reiga with God in heavenly pomp and holy splendor, ascribe their deUverance and advancement to the 110 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. kindness of Christ, and the efficacy of his suffer- ings ; for with triumphant pleasure and gratitude they sing, "Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father, to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever, Amen." Rev. i. 5. 6. But how does the propriety of such acknowledgments appear, if what Jesus did was not at all necessary to their deliverance from sin and advancement to dignity and delight? From the above considerations it appears, there ■was a necessity for Jesus to die, the just for the unjust, that he might bring them to God. Some again admit the death of Christ was ne- cessary, in order to the forgiveness of sins, yet deny him the honour of properly meriting for his people an exemption from punishment, and assert that the efficacy of his sufferings as a sacrifice arose entirely from the will and appointment^ of God. * This opinion is sometimes advanced and advocated by persons who are the farthest possible from desiring to detract from the glory of the Redeemer. Let such per- sons carefully weigh the reasoning of this author, and they will see cause to relinquish their opinion. In con- firmation of his position the following considerations are offered to the reader. 1. Sin cannot be forgiven without a satisfaction to eternal justice. Justice i^ an essential attribute of Deity ; if its claims are compromised, the basis of Divine govern- ment is undermined : for ''justice and judgment are the establishment (see margin) of his throne." Sin has THE ^OCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. Ill That he became a mediator, surety, and sacrifice on behalf of his people, in consequence of Divine appointment, is undoubtedly evident ; but that his value and worth, efficacy and merit, arose from merited punishment; its wages is death. Now the blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sin ; and yet it must be removed, and blood (i.e. death) is requisite to remove it. Heb. ix. 22. " The Lamb of Godreally taketh away the sin of the world," and Christ is that Lamb. Hence the death of Christ is a real sacrifice ; i. e. it takes away sin in virtue of its inherent efficacy ; and not merely because it was appointed to do so. " He is the propitia- tion for our sins." 2. The Prophets taught the reality of his sacritice. What other interpretation can be put on such passages as the following, by the simple student of the holy ora- cles ? Isa. liii. 4— 6, 8, 10, 11, 12. and Dan. is. 24. 26. Here is nothing indicative of the efheacy of his sufferings being derived from his being appointed ; but on the contrary, the clearest statements that his sufferings were substitutionary, and his sacrifice real. True he was " set forth as a propitiation ;" but his being set forth did not render him such. He was set forth as such, because he was such, and as the apostle says, for these two purposes '- First, '•' that God might he just" in forgiving sin ; and Secondly, that he might appear just : — *' to declare his righteousness in the forgiveness of sins that are past," and " that God might be just and the justifier of him that believeth " Now neither of these purposes could have been accomplished if justice had not been satisfied j unless (which will not be supposed) God should sacrifice his truth by appearing just^ when in fact he was not so. 112 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIIkS. thence, can never be proved. God graciously provided and found the ransom, on which account ]>ardon, jtistification, and the whole of salvation is all of iijrace ; free exuberant grace, and rich mercy. Tiiat a j)erson of such infinite worth and dignity as Imuianuel, God's own, and only begotten Son, should die for sinners, is an unparalleled instance of favour and love. It is the wonder of angels, the terror of devils, and the joy and triumph of saints. But it is absurd to suppose his personal dignity arose from his debasement, that he became strong, because help was laid upon But if justice be satisfied with the death of Jesus, our position is established ; for nothing but a " quidpro quo" will satisfy it ; and the deatli of Christ was a real sacrifice. 3. The New Testament writers are explicit to the same point. 2 Cor. v. 21. " He made him to be a sin-offering for us." Gal. .iii 13. " Christ hath redeemed us from tlie rurse, — being made a curse for us." 1 Pet. ii. 24. *' Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree." iii. 18- " Christ^sufFered for sins, the just for the unjust." The plain and obvious meaning of these passages is, that Jesus endured all that even handed justice required, instead of the designated objects in whose place he stood ; andthus secured, for them, exemption from its endurance. If he endured less than this, justice is not satisfied, and the Divine honor is tarnished. If he endured this, his death was, as we have seen above, a real sacrifice. Ed. THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 113 liim, or that his real worth arose from his appoint- ment to ransom miserable captives, and discharge the debt of prodigal transgressors. Christ was appointed, and agreed in covenant to do and suf- fer what he was under no natural obligation to perform or endure; and from his native dignity, worth, and ability, arose his merit and efficacy. To suppose God appointed his death to be effica- cious without real efficacy, or meritorious without personal merit, is a contradiction in terms, an awful reflection on the Divine understanding, and an affront to common sense. Again, if God ac- cepted of the death of Jesus as meritorious, though it was not so in its own nature, then might he have pardoned sins by a simple act of sovereign clemency, without the death of his Son; for it would surely have been equally just to have par- doned sin without a sacrifice, as to remit sin in consequence of that which is, in its nature, desti- tute of merit and efficacy. Once more, if merit and real efficacy arise only from the Divine ap_ pointment, it would have been possible for the blood of bulls and of goats to have taken away sin, or any other animal would have been suf- ficient for the removal of guilt and saving lost sinners, if God had been pleased to have appointed such an end to have been answered by their death. But the direct contrary to the above is asserted by one who well understood and delighted in the doctrine of reconciliation. His words are: "Fo^ it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats K 114 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. should take away sins ;" Heb. x. 4, " which sacrifices can never take away sins ;" verse 11. " It was ne- cessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. But now once in the end of the world hath he (Christ) appeared, to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself;" chap. ix. 23, 26. "He hath made peace by the blood of his cross," Heb. ix. 12; "having obtained eternal redemption for us," "made an end of sin, made reconciliation for iniquity, and l)rought in an everlasting righteousness," "with which the Lord is well pleased ;" Dan. ix. 24. Isaiah, xlii. 21. Therefore to every believer Jehovah says, "Fury is not in me." Isaiah xxvii. 4. It is hoped the above remarks may help the entangled Christian over the objections made against the necessity, merit, and eflScacy of the Saviour's death, as an atoning sacrifice for sin, and tend to increase his knowledge of, faith in, and love to the blessed Jesus, as able to save to the uttermost all that come unto God by him. I should therefore add no more on the subject, were it not for another stumbling-block lately thrown in the way of believers, equally, if not more formidable in appearance than the above: Which is, if Christ was a Divine person, he could not atone for sin, because Deity could not die. This artful objection seems intended to draw the unwary Christian into a dreadful dilemma? THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 115 either to give up the soul-supporting doctrine of the atonement, or to deny the divinity of tlie Son of God. The objection is the more dangerous, as it seems to look on the doctrine of atonement with a smiling, approving countenance. But in fact the design of it is to undermine the real per- sonal merit of Ciirist, and place the efficacy of his blood to the account of God's appointment, as mentioned above. The evident, though disguised intention of the objection and language is plainly this: "Sinners, you must be content with a finite "creature .Saviour, or none at all. If Christ be "God, he is too great to do you any essential "service as a Saviour, because Deity cannot die. "Therefore do not think siti is infinitely odious_ " and hateful to God. It does not demerit infi- " nite displeasure and punishment. If it did, " there could be no infinite satisfaction made to "God; for even supposing Christ to be Divine? '' his sacrifice could not be of infinite value, be- " cause as a Divine person he could not die." Let us calmly consider this formidable objection, and seriously attend to the supposed dreadful dilemma, in which will be found more artful sophistry, than argument and solid sense. Death always implies a separation or a loss of that wherein life consisted. Death, in the sense we are now called to consider it, is a separation of the principle of sensation and influence; thus it is said, " The body without the spirit is dead." Without the soul it is in a state of total inactivity? 116 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. incapable of voluntary motion, and divested of all sensation. Now though the body only be the sub- ject of death, considered as a state of inactivity and insensibility, yet the man is said to be dead, when soul and body, the constituent parts of hu- manity, are separated, although the soul or spirit, distinctly considered from the body, is not the subject of death. A spirit cannot die, because it is of a simple or uncompounded nature. There is no part of a soul, from whence another part of itself can be separated or divided. If a soul can be so separated, consciousness either does, or does not, continue in each separated part. If each part remain conscious, then are they two souls, or two conscious subsistences. If one sepa- rated part of the soul remain unconscious, or in a state of insensibility, wherein does that supposed unconscious part differ from matter ? A created spirit might cease to exist, if God so determined ; but die it cannot. Annihiliation is not death. What is annihilated has no existence, but what is dead exists, however its form be changed. There is therefore no force in the objection. Deity cannot die ; for as no spirit can die, it might as pertinently be objected, if Christ had a soul he could not atone for sin, because a soul cannot die. But the death of a spirit cannot be supposed ; in that case, death is not predicable ; yet a man being composed of body and spirit, is with propriety said to be dead, when matter and mind, those constituent parts of humanity, are separated. THE DOCTRINE OP ATONEMENT. 117 Dead saints are therefore said to *' rest in their beds," in respect of their bodies: yet in reference totlieir souls, "each one is walking in his upright- ness." Death is therefore called a departure. " The time of my departure is at hand." Now as the Divine and human Spirit of our Immanuel ceas- ed to animate his body, the person of the Mediator may as properly be said to have been dead, as the person of Samuel, David, . or any other. It may be necessary to observe, that death does not dis- solve the relation between the body and spirit, but death consists in a total cessation of vital in- fluence, or a removal from the body, for a peribd, of the principle of sensation and animation. But the relative union still continuing, therefore the spirits of martyrs are represented as concerned about, and longing for their bodies, which were killed for the cause of Christ on earth, and at the resurrection every soul will have its own body. As through the separation of body and soul, and the relation between them being undissolved, the man is properly dead, and yet the soul not changed in its natural powers ; so, in like manner, and for the same reason, it appears the person of the Mediator was really dead for a time, his precious body not being animated by, though related to, his human and Divine spirit. Yet his death does not imply or suppose the least change or mutabil- ity in its Divine ^lature, nor any alteration in the powers and properties of his soul. Agreeably to the above view of things we are told, that when 118 DOCTRINAL DIFFICULTIES. the beloved disciple saw liis Lord in transcendent splendour and majestic glory, and fell at his feet as dead, the reviving and compassionate language of Jesus was, "Fear not, I am the first and the last, he that liveth and was dead, and behold I live for evermore, amen ; and have the keys of hell and death." Rev. i. 17, 18. That he, the first and the last, was dead, is again repeated in the solemn message sent to the church at Smyrna. Rev. ii. 8. Thus it appears that there is no force at all in the objection aforesaid ; for instead of Christ's divinity rendering him incapable of atoning for sin, the infinite virtue and value attending the sufferings of his humanity arose from its union with the Divine nature, as one person. By virtue of which union his blood is divinely precious, and called the blood of God : like as the spirits under the altar call the blood with which they sealed their testimony for God, when in the body, our hlood.^^ *To elucidate the above subject, and i-ender it plain to youngChristians,itmay notbe amiss to observe the follow- ing easy illustrative gradations. There is a value or worth attending simple matter considered as the produc- tion of God, who made every thing good, yea, very good ; yet animated matter is superior to what is not so, though it were an inferior form ; otherwise a living dog would not be better than a dead lion, nor the body of a man preferable to a bag of sand. Animated bodies arise in value and respect, in proportion to tjie natural superiority of the spirits by which they are governed and influenced ; though the body of a sparrow is^the subject of aniraatioa THE DOCTRINE OF ATONEMENT. 119 May the Lord the Spirit less these attempts to remove the stumbling-blocks out of the way of serious inquiries after the truth as it is in Jesus. as much as the body of a man, yet a human body is of tnore value than many sparrows. Again, the importance of actions through the medium of matter arises from the volitions and influence of the spirit by which they are performed ; were it not so, the action of a man would not excel those of a monkey. Moreover, in regard to human nature, there is agreat disproportion in real worth, arising from internal qualities, or external dignity; for scarcely for a righteous man will one die, yet peradven- ture for a good man, some would even dare to die. HenceDavid's adherents said, T/jowar^toorif/i ten thousand of us. How infinitely precious and worth 3'^ then was the Divine Jesus, in whom dwelt all the fulness of the God- head bodily. May every believer's heart glow with love to him, and gratitude for him, and say, with unfeigned lips, " Thayiks be to God for his unspeakable gift.^' 120 EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES. PART II. EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES- CHAPTER I. — A sinner's WARRANT TO APPLY TO CHRIST. Stumbling-blocks relating to christian ex- perience are various; and what generally appears first in view is, respecting what right or warrant an undone sinner hath to apply to Jesus as a Sa- viour. It is common for those who afe convinced of sin, and see the need of salvation, to look for some good thing in them, as the ground of en- couragment for their applying to and closing with the blessed Jesus. But finding themselves altogether vile, sinful, and unworthy, they appre- hend it would be daring presumption in their pre- sent condition to trust in, or apply to him for sal- vation. The stumbling-block, in this case, seems to arise from a mistaken apprehension,* accounting *There is another misapprehension, the correction of which may relieve the perplexity of the persons in question. They confound Christ, the Messiah, with simple Deity ; and as God " cannot look on iniquity with allowance, they draw the same conclusion respecting Christ; especially if they cordially believe the truth of his Deity. But Christ, though truly and properly God, is not merely and only God. To God the sinner WARRANT TO APPLY TO CHRIST. IQl tliat which supports a ])erson's right to come to Christ is synonymous with, or equivalent to, what evidences an interest in him ; or, in other words, persons want to k?)ow that they are really convert- ed before they dare apply to Jesus. What greatly tends to entangle and retard the progress of such souls, are certain injudicious and dangerous max- ims relating to experimental religion. First ; Some will say. and many suggest, that it is not the duty of unconverted people to pray. But if so, in order to a conviction of prayer being a duty, the prayeWess person, even while continuing so, must have evidence of a conversion to God, which is ridiculously absurd. Though Peter per- ceived tiiat Simon the sorcerer was in the gall of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity, yet he direct- ed /lim to penitence and prayer. It is evident there can be no gracious acts, but in consequence of gracious principles ; yet it is equally evident, that needs a medium of approach ; — not so to Christ, who is, in one person, God and man. To him the sinner may approach as a sinner. To the Father, no man can ap- proach but by Christ ; but to Christ the sinner may come immediately. True, Christ infinitelyhates sin, and hates it in the applicant ; but he is the friend of the smner, and to him the sinner may come confidently. And ezjcr?/ sin- ner may do so ; for the warrant of an approach to him is not any merit in the applicant, nor any knowledge of the divine purpose to accept him in particular ; but it is the invitation given to all, and a knowledge from divine de- clarations, of a purpose to receive all who apply. — Ed. 122 EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES, gracious principles cannot be discerned but by gracious acts ; therefore such acts must necessarily precede^or be prior to the discernment of a spiritual principle. It is therefore impossible for any man to know or feel himself to be the subject of grace while he isprayerles3, or to have the least evidence of his relation to Christ, without a reliance upon him and delight in him. To assert, therefore, thai persons are not to pray till they are converted, is dangerous and absurd. Dangerous, as it leads into a state of deception, into the very essence of pharisai&m ; for such as think themselves converted before they come to Christ, by penitential prayer and faith, found their hopes on self-rightex)usness : the secret language of their deceived hearts is, God he thanked, I am not noiv like other men, stand by, thou unconverted sinner, I am holier than thou. Such do not go to Christ as a trembling criminal, but a confident convert j not as an undone sinner, but a self-admir- ed saint. Again ; such a representation is danger- ous, as it tends to fatal security, and keeps a carnal mind in profound and fatal peace ; for a man lives without prayer, and consequently without God, yet his conscience does not, cannot accuse him with the neglect of duty. If he ought not to pray, an aversion to pray is not a criminal, but a commenda- ble disposition ; for surely a person is much to be commended for being averse to what he ought not to do. If it be said, an unregenerate man ought not to pray, because while in such a state they are WARRANT TO APPLY TO CHRIST. 123 incapable of spiritual actions, such objectors ought to point out what duties the unconverted can per- form acceptably, or allow that they are not bound to the performance of any ; and if not under obli- gation to obedience, they are not chargeable with sin, and consequently are in a state of safety, not being exposed to punishment; for whoever are not culpable need not fear the Divine displeasure. But God has said he will pour out his fury on all them who call not on his name. It is shocking to think any poor sinner should be taught to consider himself exempted from an acknowledgment to God for the mercies he enjoys, and hkewise from an application to him for present or future favors. Besides, it is absurd to assert, that a person ought not to pray until he feels him- self converted, for it is much the same as saying a man ought not to ask for guidance till he knows he is right, nor seek for a cure till he feels himself healed. Secondly : A second stumbling maxim is, No man can be the subject of genuine repentance till he beholds by faith the Redeemer as dying for his transgressions, or at least have hope that his sins are forgiven him. A poor wounded sinner not being so favored, is thereby taught to consider the way to the Saviour as barred against him ; yea to conclude it would be an affront to the Lord, a horrid provocation to God, for him to pray, Take away all iniquity ; or so much as to cry, God be merciful to me a sinner : for all such language is 124 EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES. only solemn mocking in the lips of the impenitent ; and impenitent such must be, who are destitute of real repentance. But is it not strange that a per- son cannot be sorry for a fault till he hopes he shall not be punished ; nor sincerely beg for afavor till he enjoys it ? How shall a person while he is in a state of impenitency know, or what is his war- rant to conclude, that Christ died for him in parti- cular ? There is nothing in Scripture to encourage an impenitent sinner to believe or hope he is in a safe condition, but the very reverse is plainly and awfully expressed, " Thou, — after thy hardness and impenitent heart, treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God." Rom. ii. 5. "For except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish." Luke xiii. 3. " If we confess our sins, God is faithful and just to forgive us our sins;" but the sense of no Scripture is, if God will give us assur- ance, or hope of a pardon, we will be faithful and just to acknowledge our offences. If there be no true repentance till the soul behold by faith the Redeemer as dying for its sins, then are we pre- sented with a view of an impenitent believer, or one who believes his sins are pardoned, for the commission of which he was never sorry. The Scriptures represent the nature of repentance and faith, and the connexion between them, as the very reverse of those raw and rash assertions before referred to, " Repent and be converted, that your WARRANT TO APPLY TO CHRIST. 125 sins may be blotted out when the times of refresh- ing shall come from the presence of the Lord." Acts iii. 19. Repentance towards God and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ are subjects so im- portant and comprehensive, as to include the sub- stance of the great apostle's ministry : the necessity of repentance in order to the hope of pardon through faith in the blood of Jesus, he constantly inculcated and testified both to the Jews and Greeks. Acts xx. 21. Christ is exalted to give first repentance ; and then remission of sins to Israel. Acts v. 31. Par- don of sin is never, in all the Scripture, declared as belonging to the impenitent, but its uniform language is agreeable to the solemn assertion of the Son of God; "Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish." Luke xiii. 3. 5. Therefore the belief of a pardon is not prior to repentance* repentance indeed implies knowledge of, and belief in the righteous and holy nature of God and his law, and a persuasion of personal criminality, as represented in the word of God. It consists in a pungent sense of the evil of sin; — a loathing and hearty forsaking of it, and humiliation for it ; joined with a justification of the righteousness of God in passing sentence on the guilty criminal. Repent- ance therefore implies, and is accompanied with the primary actings of faith, and is the immediate effect of grace in the soul; but the first actings of faith are not a believing the person is pardoned, J26 EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES. nor even u reliance* on Christ for the remission of sin. Nothing can be more false than that an imj)eni- tent person has a revealed right to pardon ; if he ought to believe he is pardoned before he repents, then he ought to believe a lie. But the most firm, hearty, and constant belief of a falsehood will never njake it a truth. To suppose a person to believe in Christ as a dying Saviour, without repentance, is the same as supposing a man to need a physician, and long for a cure, while he is whole. But that such need not a physician, but they that are sick ; see Matt. ix. 12. It is impos- sible such a faith can be right, which springs from * If the true meaning of the author appear in the text, the Editor questions, at least, its correctness. If a re- liance on Christ for the remission of sins be not the prima- ry act of faith, the author should have told his readers what that act is. It is not indeed a belief that sin is ac- tually remitted prior to reliance on Christ ; but it is a re- riance on him for it, i. e- an expectation of the blessing of remission from him. It may, perhaps, be said that the first act of faith is submission to Christ — a commitment of the whole soul to him, to be disposed of by his sovereign will, and this under the influence of Esther's sentiment, '* If I perish — 1 perish y" — but then we would ask whether there is not even in this commitment of the soul to Jesus, a forhjrn hope, at least, that it may he his will to pardon and save r If this be admitted, it is all for which we contend : such a commitment of the soul includes a reliance on Christ for remission of sins : — it says " Other refuge have I none, Helpless hangs my soul on thee." Ed. WARRANT TO APPLY TO CHRIST. 127 an impenitent heart, and which consists in believ- ing that to be a fact, of the truth of which there is no evidence. If such a faith be not genuine, how can a false faith produce true repentance ? Re- pentance is proved to be of a genuine spiritual nature, by its continuance and increase, when the fault repented of is remitted. But the conviction of blame does not spring from a forgiveness of the crime. Legal repentance, or the terrific operation of the law on the conscience without the grace of the gospel, arises from the sense of danger, and is continued and increased only by the fear of pun- ishment ; therefore when danger disappears, and self is supposed to be safe, such a repentance im- mediately dies, the idea of danger being its sole support. But true - repentance, arising from a change of heart, a new and holy principle, and consisting in an aversion to sin, considered in its power and pollution, as well as its punishment, therefore a sense of pardon (though it does not give existence or being to repentance) greatly increases a godly sorrow for sin, the evil of which is more deeply impressed on the mind from a view of the Saviour's sufferings, and the infinitely amia- ble character of God as a righteous lawgiver and loving Father. Such a view melts the soul into evangelical sorrow for sin, and inflanies the mind with indignation against it, and a vehement desire after its total destruction ; called by the apostle revenge. 2 Cor. vii. 11. When God pours on his chosen the spirit of grace, he first convinceth the 128 EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES. soul of sin, and is then to his people a Spirit of supplication ; and such suppUants, saith the Lord, shall look upon him whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son. Zech. xii. 10. The language of the true penitent, under the enjoyment of a full par- don, is beautifully set forth in the following lines : — Whilst, with a melting, broken hetut, My murdered Lord I view, I'll raise revenge against my sins, And slay the murderers too. Watts. Again, thirdly: It is frequently asserted, that a true faith in Christ is inseparably connected with the knowledge of an interest in him, or that there can be no proper believing in Jesns without con- sidering him as a person's own : this has proved a stumbling block to many ; for as common sense suggests the absolute necessity of €i?i