- bo /* 5 Ge ; PP) A, Ct Er a eleva e ela a ¢ Le mibatetan eet aehet. athe ‘ fala ata kd +8 Sie. st ST EL, lab em ate at 8 : ; nt bl be 12 2:8 aa Rie ais 7 a Thee eraterenh a Bl be ane ' 2 Flee eis 'a8 3.28 La 2) 0 Rees esene +o tee 4S eiec8 i° © t $5.0 6.6 @ 6 Sis ofh ae eee & 3a i iG eo 8 OTST BOLL AC } wee a a 8 6 ab wer tat ate tetetatatatel Mi : oid a at oe werent tMLALeL CaM htats Catatee he nM sitebatetetitat tee tt te a etate tela tererdtitatarorata? wieleieraraatarete® Oye tees tele ee eta ace Stile e wis site * 8 be e etie ee ss eis Siti aGie ie.t tetatatatetacete tite t tect tiaae a 8s 2%. 8.7.6 0.8 C1 ele 2 o,%, 8.8. 8 s I S #16,3 8.8 6.8 8 ofeeeeTaTateretaeCifetatadetafatasbecedtiey sb tit FTE ee el elele tielelerace Pe ae, PU 77F Re Oe Bee Se att We Ch eke at 7 eetusiteeetdtcteitaeatata tates vale rete talats sfelelaletsle‘olel orend batater aes? sretetatetat ile -e a4 te tle cia tater it ei, : : . bela elelate eters niga 8 esters 2) 813 tha'seet)'s b.b.8.8:8 82 816 ale plate at * eae. eS 2 8 Sle aleale Siele aig a 8 Bt Se eisie-e @ tela a ea eetee Ot tle ba 6% 8 8.6 a:8: 8.2 Bate. itatatitatatttatas #8 8 8 @es *1P Fi ele ale ele Sie nieleie.ge RRaisisee ¢ aleereietalee retovatarete Heb ate ta ale eb a 2.9.7.6.8 818.0 @ 8 8 ote a t feito ae ile ale! esltlee waite Lalele blale olstaie felis eer: etle bates eae FF 91.08 2)8 8 318 5 Ble sisitja sie € Balels $e a ee et, rit ee a elathtatarereaiite 4:5 sega [albtevere ce trerait teres #15 F488 88 baat & Min es eb tle a bis ciatarh ass &.)2)%, 2) fa 9 Hele @ie. Fieiart 6 arele bie e sie Gg aR Elegie & FT GA aK $2.8 Fala brera hte ee aeaeceae 19,8 8 sh tle_e.@ ele ateeeefi8i 8 ee gery 612.812 5.8 ge gine e Fle tla sh} @ te ae 3 f.3,9. 2.9 8 916 8 62 es ate eee bee sete a8 ne 2 oa. eie mies te HM a? : a9 . ae Pi ath, &) ieee? "a8 ptatetee et hePeeetaedtes hehe dUacerorebtats stdtatetertaeetepeanatcetaavtete SOLS Fie eG SF t 68 8 ele ee ee ere ba ets aie a16,8. &6% 6 PTA TS Se 8p ee8 € 6 85 8 eeprats Samet 3 > ele 7218 8 WR PL $12.8 9 ea eta gy ete a! 2 ana es be ub e& @s ; EM MCU MM TEM ICC HR br ket gO 2 MI BALS 818.8 Siege eh ete Cvee eae eee 5.4 70.9 8.9 82 6la a alee ea ele € 8. Pa 4 $e¢ a a 2°12 8 wes 8.8 8a 8 Reeeag ote tae PSL TRL £2. tae 72 Pa : Het dno 8 te see ee ee ge aaseteae clateratetinncateneteteattanstetes if Ont eee aoe els ciel e 818, nite pea ete tatatatie les et ee eteta ss : retntautlaatant A Ncdtetatatatetecatatetane tet tem tated ReUecatacateeeneL tang taea tanaLOuLEL oaia)a att tatatity tte t.t.8 tee bln ble ee aa 0. 8°3.3.8 8 Sisiais g8@ € e1e Wee tied see te e Re, e; =" ‘ PTE JHC MO ML ea et Das eh ST IAS Fats Sard a IG oath it Fes eee ek ee ia § & oe tat t8 8 2 tleis oe aiectele & 8 yt PA PT A 2 eaten rt b F.F.9. 8 8 be ee 8 alee 85 6 2 Ree ee ae R15 fe 8 8 se dere btarbebreeathetacet 3 at a a bot? bed bee arte ee ah A rater itt eae sch ais lslelte ae bastetetecanaes aegere mh Dh #8 Poti ofet ete ‘i A 27a" Hat a a ee PA hee be ek Sie Sar he P viarare’atatataceteteteneta aeteheoetet erate” Siete lataceres aa*t "ae" atets ats hast $2 87 ee he Fee tet Oe. 8 P19 8 8 8 a ee ele ee tek Be OR OT AOC bt he het be hf felaitltee te? a: ." Malate Te etal praia te Gta tetete tite neta rata tatetata alata tal titatetatetete On ei "ea ete ng retatatateranae rtatetat Seler it etatatatatetatathtetetetate! sloistecesaratets"ataTetathtatytatatetat, ehh eh wets seeetetitatereretgececasgnatt Be reeitetctatety taratets cored @ hk eae : ee . Pt fs 8 8.916 08 918 OF tig 2 88 0.8 8 8 a gee eta! 2/8) eece tielene ntwtatesess L)! : 32 aan an 9 i Pere a atat netetataratetatatetetett ataayeetetetatlectahy nf oe a atatetatatstatctatatetatae wet ee. ‘ nf ite asite t 7 telat ' 33 ve 5 9 . ¢ << | avatars a ht 7.812.806 €.0." 816 6 9 88 te nee be Be Pisie gt Ot aCe cUerteteraferitacelereraterucytaretatataraterately tet ete sis t ait t eb te gd 8 PP ORE Wt ott De Di PAA bg beat Betta tetatatetatetet ; ae? ¢* hats 82RD es Pitt ei sieis Fa ALTE LK ratatereia sere e § ee ete aig eee at ; 82.2 8 as reletete aatatettatetatetetete A OO es e sarerettttty a aT Mn asset ot tae Peetarrate ; La | Phe ere ED Me ar debe Sr Bt het Be DAO beg! shi Fetetatetas etae es: teu Tt 88 feiss ee ee ge eS Bee ee tities tt aye werana ge atitee Ries teas? ae | liceletatatatatatatetetstetanstatatatetstete ethtetetatet ats @ ¢ "8 aratetetetutit eh PL it “7.8 1:8 a31@ if 24 + 6 a8 asf © & ® else Gee a . 12 5.88) 8 88 Fie re be 8 avs a srtatatetetatatatptetatatetatseat rela’ e438 iidtenieinataesnel etait Feit ft Sts 2 ee ea aeetetacaeanata® eis sie s £1853 819.9 ‘ 2 aie eiete'c hts Ble e aty a8 Pett t fuels 22 at a ieie sel als RS bes a ‘ APN sitet ah Oi *! geeeiece ee alae wae beh et eet : Ptieceretacatececares *; vests ’ ah eis ei etataiets ee : stetetetererares tise satatie LPT CM CP at Of i ree : mh ? tate tiet. it feel avetetetetttatatata® A aeatacicatetsSatatat tials S.t ee ferats ates : Ge weritaretacacat tet ate ait 8.8 88 Me hehe Ay tavsferhttdeatanurutcratunctitungt €.9 3.5.6 8.2 Rb aisieie 2 § @.e 8 aera? tess 8 ;" alerelerbreranctets aif Pt SO SE I gidie eisinie be stat Rie aes ets efets efersieleceytittannescertet eite ae tele tS 8 ee bees 4 RPOU IL Bh me DA CD EIS Sf eigls fele mate 3.3.85 elhtatn tes 313.8 8 5 rehnuhiiannna Sits ttstitateteteteta® motes Sin gb es Lk BO Bt = tae 288 bate tee retefitatetetatniecstaraer erste: rtasetatitetetatetite’ ier He atatetetee F $6008 © a 8.2 88 ot 8 ee eee bere bre eazees aire a ste bia aotleserdeateleretelts ante feet tt pies 1S 3 S02 Ss tle eee sale ees eae SSE 8 BS 238 25 siete estanieentt a's! aetna etal tet e8 3b bE 8) EEG be falta sonytierastcg a tts ef fl 3? USe.0.818 5 ee be ScSlt eLale a eR 2% at 274%. Satataca a evate ate rptatitatatetatae siete’ ate*s iia) rh A sat abeiale afefele aiele rele i eesti A a “ele $ ncectedtasetanatatitaentat i valet oi ene ereate \; ata ee at) “a 2 tis AONE eatstatetetathtatatathta® 5 ate sential i RN i “ateatatehtstetitat i rolaet tlegtbere ee tits 82 me ei8.? 813 8 Ua ble satarateteatat Sigit\s ee 2 ee ele ecgta se €/¢ 3.9/8 ie a a a ea oe ete tetstg ect? EFF S888 8 were 1 “te tte POAC td a it at A A ante! Hy J, sincera ele oriPeneetatatatotetstertegtctetutoeseyatttacerse teeters retereretie’ werTatatatatdtatatata ttl tdeeter tte tientitst techie # SLE SUR ETE: tee Hae octet PLtltie tia ee sk ee ee 8 et [S/6 ls 186 Peniiientte _ele wear ite < = CS EXPLANATION ELEVATION ABOVE 6,000 FEET Pes | FROM 6,000 TO 8,000 “ @,000 8,600 ” 4,000 #,000 # 800 4,000 ” © TO 800 ——— 90° Greenwich 85 Fic. 1. MAP OF THE UNITED STATES SHOWING THE LOCATION OF WISCONSIN Courtesy of Wisconsin Geological Survey not distinguished by special names. Even the southeast por- tion of the state, the plain-land par excellence, has only re- stricted areas where the surface is flat. For the most part it is rolling and uneven, with well defined depressions con- trolling the flow of the water courses in addition to numerous lakes, ponds, and marshes. The lakes of northern and north- western Wisconsin, also, are an impressive feature of the topography. THE LAND 3 There is but one large area which from the map one rightly judges to be flat. It lies on both sides of Wisconsin River nearly in the form of an equilateral triangle, with one angle on the river near Kilbourn, another on the boundary of the Driftless Area east of Stevens Point, and the third about the same distance east of Black River Falls. This region em- braces most of Adams and Juneau counties, with smaller por- tions of Wood, Portage, Jackson, and Monroe, and a wedge- shaped slice of Waushara. Yet, even within that generally undiversified region occur the castellated rocks near Camp Douglas, Necedah Hill, and other interesting features of sur- face relief. If, with the geologist, we penetrate beneath the mantle of soil to bedrock, which is the foundation of the land, we find underlying Wisconsin a series of varying rock formations. The principal ones of these have been described as crystalline (or Archean) rocks, upper Cambrian (Potsdam) sandstone, and limestone (the last-named of several distinct kinds). The accompanying map (Fig. 2) shows the state divided geologi- eally into three main provinces determined by the prevailing character of the foundation rock, as follows: First, occupy- ing nearly the whole northern part and extending down some- what below the latitude of Green Bay, especially in Waupaca, Wood, and Portage counties, is the region of crystalline rocks; second, sweeping around this on the south, west, and east, and extending south well below the great westward bend of the Wisconsin, also along the river valley, is the region in which the bedrock is upper Cambrian sandstone; third, the portions of the map shaded deeper, namely, the whole of the eastern part of the state, the southern part, and areas along the Mis- sissippl separated by stretches of upper Cambrian, represent the limestone sections of the state. The three kinds of limestone are represented by three dis- tinct ways of parallel-lining (or hatching) the map. Where the lines are drawn northwest and southeast the rock imme- diately below the soil is the Niagara limestone. This lies on 4 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK GEOLOGICAL MAP OF WISCONSIN COMPILED BY LAWRENCE MARTIN 40 60 MILES coy SSS SINS SSS SS 3 . WY SO SS %G Vlt4, SSS “lle ey Vy LOWER MAGHESIAN LIMESTONES ST. CROIXAN OR POTSDAM 1) G/ SY, SANDSTONE. * SU Yiu we Yj Yu fs t WRU GY PRE-CAMBRIAN ROCKS. VA “/ Sey 3 FIGURE 2 Courtesy of Wisconsin Geological Survey THE LAND 5 top of other formations from the lake to the ridge escarpment shown as running from the south line of the state to Green Bay and along the southeast shore of the bay. From that line westward the Niagara has been removed by erosion, and so we come to the next lower distinct limestone formation, which is called the Galena-Blackriver (Galena-Trenton) and is rep- resented by lines drawn northeast and southwest. A still lower deposit of limestone appears under the soil wherever both the Niagara and the Galena-Blackriver have been worn away. This is called lower magnesian limestone. The symbol for this formation is the horizontal ruling. It is seen as a narrow belt running on the south side of Wisconsin River from its mouth to the great bend, and northeastward to the Michigan boundary, with islands and headlands of the same formation in the south central counties and several large but interrupted masses north of Wisconsin River. The most prominent single mass of lower magnesian is the one which underlies the counties of Pierce and St. Croix. Both north and south of the Wisconsin the lower magnesian is in many places, especially along the streams, worn through so that the upper Cambrian sandstone, which underlies it in turn, appears as the bedrock. The blotches of white shown on the map rep- resent the St. Peter sandstone, which is a thin layer usually found lying between the Galena-Blackriver and the lower magnesian. The St. Peter is soft, and in most places where its protecting cover of Galena has been removed it has also been eroded away. But occasionally it remains as the forma- tion just beneath the soil over considerable areas, as in parts of Rock, Green, Jefferson, and Dodge counties in the east, also in Vernon near Wisconsin River, and in Pierce and St. Croix in the north. All of these rock formations except the crystalline are regu- larly stratified, suggesting that they are the results of sub- marine activity in rock building. The limestones, it is sup- posed, were made by a process of consolidation from the ooze which forms on the sea-floor and which often includes a vast 6 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK amount of calcareous material derived from the shells of sea animals. In the area of crystalline rocks are found intruded masses of voleanic origin which perhaps formed the basis of one-time mountains, now eroded down until the area is nearly a plain—what is called by geographers, a peneplain. One of the main forces which affected the Wisconsin region in recent geologic times, tending to even the surface, to fill the valleys and plane down the ridges, incidentally forming lakes and marshes, changing the courses of streams, etc., was the great continental glacier. It moved over the whole state (except one section to be described later), retreated, advanced, retreated and advanced yet again, before it was finally forced, by the moderating climate, to retire into the far north. When the glacier had done its work, the surface of Wisconsin was approximately as we know it today. Vegetation came for- ward as the climate grew milder, and conditions gradually became suitable for animal and human life. For preparing Wisconsin to be the abode of a great civiliza- tion the glacial action was significant in several ways. It tended to ‘‘iron out’’ the rougher, hilly surfaces; it made the flat lands more rolling by creating elevations of glacier-borne materials upon them; it made soil and distributed it over vast areas. As the glacier moved athwart the ridges it acted like a colossal earth planer, carrying with it their rounded tops, dirt, loose rocks, and rock strata often to the depth of many feet, depositing part of this material in adjacent depressions and carrying the rest farther... The result was a rolling terrain where formerly were high hills and deep val- leys. In that manner much of what otherwise must have been waste land, because of being too steep and rugged for culti- vation, was modified by the glacier into cultivable surface. Admirable examples of this process are available in south- western Wisconsin where the Driftless Area, which was never 2 There is limestone, as we have seen, both in the glaciated and in the unglaci- ated lands. But limestone caves occur only in the unglaciated, running down into the rock formation often many feet. It is believed that the glacier, wherever it passed, disturbed the rock formation deeply enough to erode the cave-bearing upper portions. THE LAND 7 invaded by the ice sheet, joins the drift or glaciated region. The proportion of waste land in the Driftless Area is much higher on the average than in the drift. This is true notwith- standing that the glacier, in one way, created waste land by making lakes, ponds, and marshes through the uneven grading of valleys or by scooping and gouging out rock masses. It has been said that the glacier must be held responsible for most of the 2,500,000 acres of marsh land in. Wisconsin.? For the purpose of agriculture it was almost as fortunate that the flat lands were made more uneven as that the rough lands were made more smooth. A gently rolling surface affords natural drainage, for the want of which much flat land becomes waste in unfavorable seasons. Besides, the glacial hills and hillocks—the moraines, drumlins, kames, and eskers (to borrow the geologist’s terms)—diversify the surface, vary the tree growth, and account for much of the natural beauty for which Wisconsin is so justly famed. The soil, which in most places covers the bedrock, is called residual when it has been made ‘‘on the spot’’ out of the na- tive rock by the process of weathering. It becomes alluvial when produced by stream deposition; and when laid down, in fine particles, by the wind it is called loess. The above are the principal soils, classified according to derivation, which are found in unglaciated (driftless) regions. But wherever the glacier has passed over a given surface its single agency in producing and distributing soil has usually been superior to all others, and the soil of the region is called glacial, or drift, soil. These terms do not mean that the glacier necessarily made all there is of the soil, for the process of weathering and the other processes have been going forward and producing results both before and since glacial times. But the glacier has affected the soil wherever it passed. In the first place, it carried with it, often for hundreds of miles, some of the soil ?Much of that land, however, need not remain waste. A part of it could be drained by individual farmers whose farms embrace small tracts of it, and some- times extensive tracts could be drained by the codperative method, under a law for creating drainage districts. When drained and properly subdued by culti- vation, most of the marsh lands become exceptionally productive. 8 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK material which it spread over Wisconsin rock formations. Secondly, it ground up much native rock and spread it over the surface in the vicinity. And in the third place, it mingled together materials from various sources before they were finally deposited where they could grow the crops of our own day. It has been estimated that seventy-five to eighty per cent of the soil in most glaciated localities in Wisconsin was de- rived from materials of the neighborhood. The rest may have been carried great distances. No doubt Wisconsin has much soil which originated in the Canadian provinces. Certainly many of the bowlders which were carried in the glacier and dropped here and there as drift over the whole glaciated area are properly assigned to the rock formations of a far northern latitude. Sometimes the twenty or twenty-five per cent of soil derived from a distance becomes an exceedingly important element, as in a region which is underlain by a sandstone formation the soil of which is too light, porous, and deficient in plant food to possess high fertility. Thus the mixing of material derived from the crystalline rocks and from the limestones with the soil native to the great upper Cambrian region in middle Wisconsin rescued a large share of that region from compara- tive poverty. The largest continuous body of light sandy soil in Wisconsin is in the flat triangle described above, which begins near Kilbourn on the river and extends northeast and northwest to the neighborhoods of Stevens Point and Black River Falls. But that is precisely the portion of the upper Cambrian region which received no glacial drift and, except immediately along the trench of Wisconsin River, no river drift or alluvium either. Its soil is weathered sandstone. To the east of the triangle are several counties whose bedrock is the same, but having been visited by the glacier and gener- ously treated to a portion of its load of silt brought from the north and east, their soil, while still light, is much more fertile. Besides, the glacial hillocks diversify their surfaces. To the THE LAND - 9 west of the triangle is a territory of considerable size, resting on the upper Cambrian formation, to whose lower valleys far- flowing rivers have carried silt from the north, which mingling with the sand makes a productive soil. What sand was carried down from the middle region over the limestone farther south served generally, by mixing with the stiff clay of that region, to improve its soil there. YO ei, , OF NEW RICH aun Pie PUB Oe IVER LS. 6 Log ao WK iGO ° ) og 0 10 20 40 60 ~=—80 100 =: 120 MILES. ee eee ere FIG. 3. THE DRIFTLESS AREA OF SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN AND ADJACENT STATES. Courtesy of Wisconsin Geologica] Survey As already stated, there is one large section of western Wisconsin which (with adjacent portions of Illinois, Minne; sota, and Iowa) was unvisited by the glacial ice sheet—the Driftless Area. This region is in character like parts of the 10 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK South to which the glacier did not reach, but as a northern land it is unique from the fact that it forms an island of un- glaciated land in a vast sea of glaciated. The continental gla- cier, geologists have decided, split somewhere in the north- western part of the state, one lobe driving for a time south- westward and the other southeastward, thus missing the area in question. At one or more periods other forces finally brought the two lobes together again. This behavior on the glacier’s part was so striking as to make Wisconsin’s drift- less area a subject of interest to geologists the world over. The map (Fig. 3) will show the relation of that area to the rest of the state, also to the neighbor states. Its surface is estimated to include 15,000 square miles (about the size of - Denmark), of which 13,360 are in Wisconsin. It is wider in the north and narrower in the south. The Wisconsin counties of Grant, Lafayette, Iowa, Crawford, Richland, La Crosse, Monroe, Juneau, Jackson, Vernon, and Trempealeau lie within _ the Driftless Area, while Green, Dane, Sauk, Portage, Wood, Marathon, Buffalo, and Eau Claire are partly driftless and partly glaciated. By comparing the last map with Fig. 2, it is seen that the Driftless Area embraces a large territory underlain by the - Galena-Blackriver limestone in the southwestern counties, while north of Wisconsin River the formations beneath the surface are the lower magnesian limestone, the upper Cam- brian, and the crystalline, with some patches of St. Peter sandstone. The character of the country has been influenced the more by these rock formations because they do not lie quite horizontally but rise gradually toward the west and the north (though again sinking somewhat toward the Missis- sippi), making a large portion of the Driftless Area an upland. Its elevation varies from 1280 to 900 feet, while the lands nearer Lake Michigan are about 700 feet above sea level and ~ those in central Wisconsin still lower. The larger rivers, es- pecially the Mississippi and the Wisconsin, have eroded deep trenches, cutting through the limestone formation and well THE LAND 1] down into the upper Cambrian sandstone. The ridges along the Mississippi sometimes attain a height of 500 feet, which is one measure of its cutting, while the hills on both sides‘ of the Wisconsin in its lower reaches are nearly as high. Because of these deep river trenches, the smaller streams flowing into the Wisconsin and the Mississippi from the west- ern upland have likewise dissected the land deeply. Wherever these streams flow parallel to one another and near together the upland is much cut up and the bluffs are rounded. Some- times the latter are worn down to the hog-back form, or even reduced to mere flattened watersheds. But mostly the streams have eroded deep valleys, the lower courses of which are partly filled with alluvium brought from higher up, and the bluffs vary in elevation from about 400 feet near the streams’ junction with the great rivers to a few feet at their head-springs. The soil in these valleys, for the most part, is of limestone origin, though sand from the upper Cambrian formation, often cut into by the streams, is mingled therewith. The tops of the ridges are covered with weathered limestone, save where this has eroded away to the limestone bedrock. In places outcrops of St. Peter sandstone are left on the high- lands. There are no lakes in the Driftless Area and very few marshes, the drainage almost everywhere being complete. Creeks, rivulets, and rills uniting with each other and joining the main stream make a very perfect tree-like (dendritic) river system. In the older, lower portions of the valleys the streams flow sluggishly through the alluvial deposits of silt, while in their upper courses they are always swifter and sometimes have the character of mountain torrents. There they still are cutting trenches in the limestone or St. Peter sandstone, while every freshet carries down and distributes over the lowland a quantity of fine silt abstracted from the upland clays. The steep sides of the bluffs in the Driftless Area usually appear, from a distance, to be parallel-lined by the exposure of rock strata. Sometimes, when more rounded, they are cov- 12 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK ered thinly with soil and grow grass and trees successfully. The tops vary in character from the useless hog-back to fine, spacious levels capable of being cultivated and made into ex- cellent fields. In some portions these are called ridge fields.* They are reached by steep ridge roads built along the sides of the ravines from the lowlands. That portion of the Driftless Area which lies south of the Wisconsin is sometimes said to be divided by the ‘‘ Military Ridge.’’ It is more exact to say that the streams flowing north to the Wisconsin have deeply eroded the upland toward the river, reducing it to a succession of valleys and bluffs reaching back in some places only four or five miles, in others as much as thirty miles. There is also a series of south flowing streams which have eroded the surface far less deeply and usually flow at greater distances from one another. These south flowing streams have their sources near those of the north flowing streams, and the watershed between them is what is known as the Military Ridge.* This ridge, with a considerable body of land on its southern and northern slopes, was one of the notable prairies of southern Wisconsin. It reaches practically from near Prairie du Chien to the Four Lakes region. The southern part of this region differs widely from the northern. In the north the valleys are the more important, in the south the ridges. This is due to the comparative narrow- ness of the southern valleys and the width and flatness of the lands between. A comparison of the Pekatonica region with the Blue River region will make the difference clear. One thinks of the former as a part of the plain country, which it is; the latter is distinctly a part of the hill country. The Peka- tonica is a land with a stream flowing through it to furnish water and power. The Blue River is a valley made and domi- °* These ridges grew wheat successfully for some years after that cereal had ceased to be grown on the lowlands. “Because the United States Military Road from Forts Howard (Green Bay) and Winnebago (Portage) to Fort Crawford (Prairie du Chien) was built in 1835 along the top of this ridge. It is now the line of a branch of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway. THE LAND 13 nated by ariver system. The ridges between the south flowing streams are all extensive, sometimes eight or twelve miles wide; the ridges between Blue River and the Fennimore are so narrow as to show but little flat surface, while the best of the north trending ridges are only two or three miles in width and much of their surface is uneven, often steep. On the Military Ridge and portions of its slopes appear certain very fine silt loams supposed to have been deposited by the winds and called loess. These loams are generally mingled with weathered material. Whether the whole of Wisconsin was at some time or times covered with forest growth we do not certainly know. But between the several advances of the ice sheet there was always time enough for soil to be prepared and for forests to spring up. A buried forest found in Manitowoc County and the lower Fox River valley® is proof at least that such a growth occurred between the second and third glacial advances in that region. The remains consist of ‘‘logs, branches, and upright stumps.’’ When settlers began to arrive in Wisconsin they found the southern part of the territory divided between forest and prairie, the former predominating. The two maps, Figs. 4 | and 5, show how these features were intermingled.‘ These forests are described as either maple, pine, or oak, according to the kind of tree which predominated in a given area (Fig. 6). The principal maple area stretched northward from the south line of the state, along Lake Michigan to Green Bay. It was a narrow belt through Kenosha and Racine counties, but widened out across Milwaukee, Waukesha, and ‘Jefferson counties, and occupied most of Ozaukee, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Winnebago, Calumet, together with portions of Sheboygan, Brown, and Outagamie. This forest, with the lower Fox River 5’ Lawrence Martin, The Physical Geography of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin No. 36, Madison, 1916, 253-254. *The question of the origin of the prairies is still unsolved. Probably forests covered the land fully at one time, and the absence of timber anywhere may be taken as proof of its destruction (1) by fire, or (2) by root boring insects, leaf destroyers, or other pests. ™ Martin, op. cit., 126, 277. BCR Vy. UE yy THE LAND WV, Y) coecerees 16 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Conifers, with some mixed hardwoods. Dwarf oak and pine, including pine barrens. La HHH Oak group,including swamps and prairies. Maple group. FIG. 6. FOREST MAP OF WISCONSIN After Wisconsin Geological Survey, 1882 THE LAND 17 and Green Bay, enclosed a flattish triangle of land fronting on Lake Michigan which constituted the only considerable pine forest of southern Wisconsin. It began on the lake shore just south of the Sheboygan County line in Ozaukee County, ex- tended northwest to Lake Winnebago, thence northeast to Green Bay and throughout the Door Peninsula, covering Door County, Kewaunee County, Manitowoc County, with portions of Brown and Sheboygan. That forest, because of its con- venient location, constituted one of the earliest of the pine lumbering regions of eastern and southern Wisconsin. A second maple area lay north of the Wisconsin and occupied most of Richland County, also the southern part of Sauk and the western third of Crawford. "x coo XK AAKx e wax we, \ eee oto yn xeeet a eee eC ¥ en ee * Mey ant Ryn | e és A © ef ae abe - e e n me 2 e™x oy °, Lt ee eee es 5 eae 2 Z . + mele o * ear) * yA { 7 od St Por @ + ee ) e oe £ we s \ ++” oe Ce ge q +S 4 ec eee t= + ° ° 4 4heut ° . . ° VA ws ° ae ma «ZF S \ . r Ch emee = Jr . pA \ —~f 9 ° f = ——e Jue =~ f° ¥ = Nis | vaoosnw = A SS a a GF e i Vi yY-* = a Nes y \ : —rT . A = al yi . ( 19}80,7 qaengg Arey Aq umesrp ‘6EgT “reYo [BotsofOeK) ,SUIMO 194TV ma NOIDGY GVHI GEHL ‘g ‘Old 26 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK agreement with the Indian claimants of the land in 1819, when Jesse W. Shull, James Johnston of Kentucky, and others began mining systematically, a new era opened for the lead mines. In a few years the richness of the deposits came to be widely known, especially among the people of southern Illi- nois, Missouri, and Kentucky, and the mining community was augmented by every steamboat ascending the Mississippi to Fever River (Galena). In 1826 and 1827 several hundred came. They spread up through the Wisconsin district, reach- ing the northern limits of the lead region before 1829. A map published at Galena in 1829 shows how the main ‘‘diggings”’ were distributed.* It shows also beginnings of towns in names like New Diggings, Shullsburg, Cassville, Platteville, Dodge- ville, and especially Mineral Point, the acknowledged center of the Wisconsin lead district. It shows trails into the lead region from southern I]linois and from Chicago, and trails out to Green Bay, Fort Winnebago, and Fort Crawford, to Arena and English Prairie (Muscoda) on the Wisconsin, and to Cassville on the Mississippi. Galena was still the main local trade center for the entire northern lead region, while St. Louis was its commercial metropolis. A serious interruption of the prosperity of the miners was caused by the Black Hawk War of 1832, in which numbers of them volunteered for military duty. But its result was the extinction of the Indian title to practically all of the lands comprising southern Wisconsin as defined by the Illinois boun- dary, Lake Michigan, and the line of Green Bay, Fox River, and Wisconsin River to the Mississippi, thence that river to the Illinois line.® The mining community, being already well established, re- sumed its activity after the war and continued to develop in a notable manner for several years prior to the settlement of other sections of Wisconsin. A census in 1836 assigns to the *See Reuben G. Thwaites, ‘‘ Notes on Early Lead Mining,’’ in Wisconsin His- torical Collections, xiii, 271-292; also map of lead region in ibid., xi, 400. 5 For an account of the war and the treaties, see Reuben G. Thwaites, Wiscon- sin, chap. ix. EARLY SETTLEMENTS 2? territory 11,683 persons. Of these the county of Iowa, which at that time included also the later Lafayette and Grant coun- ties—essentially the lead region—had 5234. Brown County, comprising the entire Green Bay region, the Fox River valley, and Lake Winnebago, had 2706. Crawford County, which was settled only in the neighborhood of Prairie du Chien, had 850. These three constituted the established settlements, and it will be seen that the lead region was more populous by 1678 persons than the other two counties combined. The other area showing settlements, all practically new, was Milwaukee Coun- ty, which embraced the entire southeastern portion of Wiscon- sin (see Fig. 9). These scattering communities, hardly a year old, numbered 2893 persons. To this new region we must now direct attention. As soon as the Indian cessions were made, in 1832-33, gov- ernment surveyors entered Wisconsin. Beginning at the Illinois boundary as a base line, they ran the Fourth Principal Meridian due north through the heart of the lead region to Wisconsin River. Then they laid off ranges of townships on both sides of the line, always terminating, for the time, at the Wisconsin-F'ox River boundary. By the end of the year 1835 the map of that part of the state, the older Wisconsin, was chequered with the surveyors’ townships except in the south- eastern part, which was surveyed in 1836 (see Fig. 10). But the work of the government surveyors meant much more to settlers than the mere locating of township lines and section lines. The surveyors made the first detailed examina- tion of the land, recording their estimates of its quality— whether first class, second class, or third class—described the surface as level, rolling, rough and broken, or swampy, and indicated the kinds and the comparative density of the timber along the lines surveyed. They located the oak openings, the prairies, high rolling prairies, low wet prairies, level dry * That meridian was afterwards made the boundary between Grant County and Iowa and Lafayette counties. Ranges of townships in Wisconsin are numbered west and east of that meridian. 28 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK pfesesttes Rp a a LX ay: ‘ \ 3 Ww \ CHIPPEWA 5 7, P f 4% fo VV a iv op 5) COUNTY A en vas LS — ff gt Wi) 3 os ate. Li ft Va & D A. be “A 4g sia Vom A BROWN CRAWFORD COUNTY COUNTY MILWAUKEE COUNTY FIG. 9. MAP OF COUNTIES IN 1836 Ea E: NS Laake [aa 33a aes 4 EARLY SETTLEMENTS MICHIGAN 29 FIGURE 10 30 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK prairies, ete.’ Ina word, they noted the points about the lands surveyed which settlers were most keen to know, and this in- formation could be procured by land seekers, at slight expense for copying, from the government land office.’ Armed with copies of the surveyors’ plats and transcripts of his notes, the land seeker was equipped for the arduous task of selecting favorable locations for the opening of new farms, while the speculator was enabled by their means to choose likely town sites, mill sites, or lands that might soon be wanted for agri- cultural purposes. Some of the surveyors themselves were tempted to speculate in the lands they knew so well, and no doubt their special knowledge was often placed at the service of friends. Accordingly, when in 1834 the government established two land offices for western Michigan Territory—one at Green Bay and one at Mineral Point—a ‘‘land office business’’ in the sale of lands to speculators began at once. They bought up river frontage where steamer landings prophesied the estab- lishment of river towns; they secured for town sites valley lands at junctions of streams; water powers were eagerly sought out and the lands about them entered; while timbered strips along the rivers, in the prairie regions, or other fine groves, which would be needed by later farmers, were bought up in the confident expectation of their prompt and advan- tageous sale to settlers.® 7See survey notes in margins of plats in Atlas, Wisconsin Domesday Book, Town Studies, I (in press). *The surveyors were usually men of fairly good scientific training and were keen observers. Some of them, like Lucius Lyon, afterwards United States senator from Michigan, attained distinction in political life. A surveying party usually consisted of the surveyor, an ax-man, and two chainmen, The State Land Office at Madison has a complete collection of the notebooks of Wisconsin land surveyors, also all original survey plats. The romance of the land surveying period has almost wholly escaped the American novelist. °The land office tract books contain the records of sales. When these are compared with the surveyors’ plats and notes, the story of speculation is revealed, and one sees usually just what advantage the speculator sought to secure when he located his land. Names of many distinguished Americans appear on the plats of Wisconsin lands. We note among them Daniel Webster, Edward Everett, Caleb Cushing, and Ralph Waldo Emerson. Timbered lands in western New York, in 1830, were considered quite as valuable as the best farming lands. So there was seen to be good business sense in buying timbered lands. EARLY SETTLEMENTS 3| However, the speculative furore, which temporarily col- lapsed with the panic of 1837, expended itself mainly in the western ranges of townships surveyed early, and thus the splendid farming territory now embraced in Rock, Walworth, Kenosha, Racine, Milwaukee, Waukesha, and Jefferson coun- ties remained almost wholly open to the selections of pros- pective settlers. Settlement in the southeastern counties of Wisconsin forms an excellent commentary on the process of settling the wild lands of the country as a whole. Theoretically, it might seem as if the lands would have been taken first directly along the lake front wherever ports were within reach,.and thereafter the belt of settlement would gradually widen away into the interior, the means of communication being created as fast as the increments of new settlement required. In fact, no such regularity in settling a new country has ever been observed. The geographic and social facts which imparted their impulses to the agricultural occupation of southeastern Wisconsin were mainly three: first, the existence of the lead mining region of northwestern Illinois and southwestern Wisconsin, whose in- terests tended to converge upon the Mississippi and Rock riv- ers; second, Chicago, city of destiny, building up near the foot of Lake Michigan and eagerly seeking ways of concentrating lake trade at that port; third, the foresight shown by the build- ers of Milwaukee, that for successful rivalry with Chicago their port must establish roads, canals, or other means of drawing commerce from the interior. The lead mines themselves constituted at first no inconsid- erable market for agricultural produce,’® and it is not surpris- ing that farmers should have desired the fine prairie lands in the vicinity of Rock River, particularly in the days when the navigability of that.stream for steamboats was almost an article of religious faith. Rock River was a tributary of the Mississippi, and the entire lead region continued for a number In 1843, by the act of August 3, the lead miners were permitted to purchase their claims. Thereafter farming became a more important feature of life in the lead region. 32 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK of years to look to St. Louis as their metropolis. But Mil- waukee’s builders saw the significance of the Rock River val- ley, as well as the mines, and promptly projected their Mil- waukee and Rock River Canal, which, although it ultimately failed, had a powerful effect in directing settlement along des- ignated lines, promoting road building, and binding the inter- ests of large areas occupied by new conimunities to the lake port at Milwaukee. Fox River (or the Pishtaka) is a branch of the Illinois. The lower portions of its valley, within the state of Illinois, began to be settled almost as soon as the discussions in the Illinois legislature advertised the prospect of a canal connecting the lake at Chicago with [Illinois River. Such a canal would open out a market by the lakes, while [llinois River, like the Rock, connected with the Mississippi. Fox River itself was supposed to be navigable for flat-bottomed boats as far as Rochester in Racine County, fifty-four miles by a direct course from the Illinois line. To a generation which still relied on the flatboat as a means of marketing its surplus products, farming in the vicinity of such a stream, even without a canal, seemed a reasonably safe, normal manner of life. So it was that pioneers ascended Fox River, marking out claims at attractive points; others ascended Rock River or reached it overland from Chicago by the prairie trails almost as early as the founders of Racine and Kenosha took cog- nizance of the promising lake ports south of Milwaukee. And once a lodgment was effected in the river valleys themselves, the intervening prairies and openings were scoured for mill sites, town sites, and the choicest farming situations," all in advance of the construction of roads or the canals which pro- moters were promising. But the land office records show that, in general, the farm locations fixed upon had a very definite relation to prospective improvements like canals, roads, and “See Vanderpoel’s letter in Racine Argus, June 2, 1838. Fine description of two beautiful farm sites already occupied in 1837 in the district between Fox and Rock rivers. EARLY SETTLEMENTS 59 later, railroads, or to existing facilities for marketing prod- ucts, especially by the rivers. The movement which resulted in the first occupation of the southeastern counties began in 1835. It attained consider- able vigor in 1836 and 1837, and by the end of the year 1839 the region may be considered settled, though much good land was to be had for some time thereafter. It was a movement in which hundreds were engaged at the same time, and while some localities were occupied a little earlier and some a little later, as the local histories show, for the purposes of this general statement it is sufficient to regard the principal set- tlements as having taken place about the same time. These principal settlements were near the lake shore, from the south- east corner of Kenosha County north almost continuously to the Milwaukee County line; along Fox River in both Kenosha and Racine counties;}* along Rock River, near Beloit, Janes- ville, and farther north, also west of the river, on the prairie; at Lake Geneva, Troy Lake, Whitewater, Delavan, Spring Prairie, Elkhorn Prairie, ete. in Walworth County. The Fox River line was followed northward into Waukesha County, as was the line of Rock River and its tributaries, and the pro- posed canal, into both Waukesha and Jefferson counties, set- tlers always being guided by the opportunity of securing ideal locations near the natural or artificial lines of communication and transportation. It is possible with the aid of the records of entries and pur- chases, with the surveyors’ description of the land, the topo- graphical charts prepared for some areas by the United States Geological Survey, and the soil surveys (available in a few eases) to exhibit minutely the settlers’ choices among kinds of land. A good illustration is township 3, range 22 east, which is a part of the town of Mount Pleasant, in Racine County, whose eastern boundary is Lake Michigan and which contains the port of Racine. The chart (Fig. 11) shows that the eastern ranges of sections were taken up at the earliest possible time, ” Kenosha County was set off from Racine County in 1850. 34 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK ———— i \ 5 Dog? "JOR aes ge ie 7 coe . ooo? eee ai? 5 ? YQ POS Boyt | * @ Pou? a q Q MARL AT, 4r2 J 138 os) : [ fx re Peleg e agile Aes 22 AV72ed 4 Prepared for the Wisconsin Domesday Book Fic. 11. LAND ENTRIES, RACINE COUNTY EARLY SETTLEMENTS 35 in 1838-39, the first land sale at the Milwaukee land office. Some of the southern sections and some of the northern sec- tions were taken at the same time, together with small de- tached areas elsewhere; but the great body of land in the western and central portions of the township was left for later purchase, some of it going as late as 1846. According to the surveyor, the land which was shunned by the earliest comers was quite as good, on the whole, as that which was taken first. Why was it left? The township in question is a prairie township. Most of the land is described by the surveyor as high prairie and the contour lines on the topographic chart show lowlands in only two principal areas, both of them narrow and inconsid- erable as compared with the broad ridges. A few small de- pressions occur in the prairies themselves. Within the east- ernmost of the long low strips—the one along the course of Pike River and above its head—are the only extensive marshes in the township, though a smaller marsh occupies the . second trench, in sections 8, 9, and 17. There are practically no openings, though patches of forest relieve the otherwise undiversified prairie character of the land. The chart indi- cates, generally, the distribution of forest, high prairie, low prairie or meadow, and marsh land. All of the sections in the easternmost range had some timber on them except 12, and a body of timber lay just east of that section. There was also timber in 35, 31, a little in 30, a considerable body in 3 and 4, 9 and 10. Sections 6 and 7 abutted on a ‘‘grove’’ in township 3, range 21 east. A road, hardly better than a trail at the out- set, crossed diagonally from section 35 to section 1—the so- called Chicago-Green Bay road. At an early date also an- other territorial road was opened through the northern part of the town from east to west. The marshes along Pike River may be considered an obstacle to easy road making from the main road into the central portion of the township, but this obstacle disappears at the south as well as at the north. 36 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Our land-entries cards show that the easternmost range of sections and the easternmost half of the next range were en- tered at once on the opening of these lands to sale.1? Beyond that, the purchases were sporadic. They included low ground, but not the lowest, along Pike River—lands which adjoined the preferred sections—also some other low land in the south, the timbered tract in section 31, three tracts toward the north- west which had timber at their western margin, and all of the big grove in the north, with some tracts of adjacent prairie. But the big, open, unsheltered prairie occupying the middle and western portions of the township was left for several years as ‘‘cow commons”’ for the farms ranged around it. The facts brought out in this study are reinforced by those which emerge in the study of other towns. They show that the early pioneers appreciated timber when found, in sparse measure, in a prairie region. They loved to build their homes in the shelter of woods. They preferred a tract of woodland as a portion of their holdings, but at any rate they wanted wood within easy reach. For plow land they chose the high prairie because it was well drained, or land of the same char- acter in the openings. If they could have this as the main portion of their farms, with forty or eighty acres of timber and an equal quantity of low prairie or meadow, they were content. Those who entered a new region early enough to pick and choose, invariably selected lands which gave them these three elements of fundamental utility. The first claim takers in Mount Pleasant obtained them approximately. Later comers, observing that the vacant lands were too exclusively prairie, swerved off toward Fox River, or took the prairie trails to Rock River, or went up into Jefferson, Waukesha, or Dane County in order to lay the foundations of their farms in the right kinds of land properly distributed. It was only when they began to realize the counter disadvantage involved in hauling their surplus wheat twenty, thirty, fifty, or one hundred miles over heavy roads to the lake ports (which they * Most of those lands, to be sure, had been ‘‘claimed’’ and settled upon earlier, some as early as 1835, the bulk of them in 736, ’37, and 738. EARLY SETTLEMEN1S af in the beginning hoped to avoid by shipping on rivers and canals), that they saw the possibilities in the left-over lands lying within eight or ten miles of such ports.14 Then the big prairie in Mount Pleasant was promptly taken up, and by the end of 1846 there was nothing left except the school section and a few small pieces of swale land. It is noteworthy that nearly all those who entered govern- ment lands thus early, in Kenosha, Racine, Walworth, and Rock counties, bore names which show their possessors to have been Americans, or at least English speaking persons. And the testimony of those who describe the early settlements is that the people were mostly from New York and New Eng- land. The testimony of the census is to the same effect. For example, in 1850 Mount Pleasant in Racine County had a population of 1101; of that number, 842 were native born, 259 foreign. There were 144 American families and only 48 for- eign families. Similar statistics are obtained for Whitewater in Walworth County, which had 992 American and 234 for- eign born. In Plymouth, Rock County, were 377 American born persons, and 194 foreign born. The county of Racine in 1850 had a total population of 15,004, with 8867 natives and 6083 foreign born. Kenosha County’s figures were 10,735 native and 3383 foreign born, while Walworth had 14,865 to 2787 and Rock 16,435 to 4201. These statistics show a great preponderance of native born in those counties taken as a whole.?® Going north to Milwaukee County and to Washington County the case is different. In 1850 Milwaukee County had 18,229 foreign born as against 12,685 native, while Washing- ton County had 12,100 foreign and 7252 native. Thus it appears that some condition, which in Washington County at least could not have been the presence of an impor- 4 Many of the early settlers left New York and Vermont at a time when new canal projects were being prosecuted to completion almost yearly. It is little wonder they should have faith in a project as seemingly feasible as the Milwaukee and Rock River Canal. *T am using, in the county statistics, the results of a hand count made for the Society by Dr. M. M. Quaife, with an assistant. 38 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK tant town, was causing the northern counties to be settled largely by people of foreign birth. A study of the land entries for the town of Franklin, Milwaukee County, shows that the earliest entries were made mainly by English speaking per- sons who, in rather numerous cases, were Irish or of Irish descent. But many of the American entrymen appear to have bought for speculative purposes, or at least decided in a few years to sell their lands, for the transfers became numer- ous in the forties, and by 1850 there were only 15 American families to 285 foreign.1® The foreigners included 282 per- sons born in Germany, 292 born in Ireland, and 39 in Holland. All other countries furnished 58. The one significant contrast between the lands of Racine County and those of Milwaukee, Ozaukee, and Washington counties is that the former are prairies and openings, with some dense groves; the latter are heavily forested for the most part. It might seem from this that American settlers preferred the more open lands, while immigrants from for- eign lands preferred to begin in the woods. The case, how- ever, is not so simple. We have already seen that the ideal farm, to the American settler, was a combination of timber, prairie or opening, and marsh—for fuel and shelter, cultiva- tion, and hay or pasture. Now, the above is precisely the ‘‘ideal farm’’ for the ambitious immigrant as well as for the native. William Dames, an intelligent German immigrant of 1848, after much search found such an ideal tract. It had, he says, ‘‘160 acres in prairie, 320 acres openings and 160 acres meadow together with some marsh along the shores of Rush Lake.’!7 The same writer speaks of the ‘‘murderous toil’’ of clearing a farm in the heavy timber, which he regards as a life job for the unfortunate settler. Why, then, did so many German immigrants elect to spend their lives in making farms under those conditions? In this count the family is classified by the birthplace of its head. lre- quently the children of foreign parents were natives. * William Dames, Wie Siteht es in Wiskonsin Aus (1848). EARLY SETTLEMENTS 39 The answer is found, by analogy, in this other question: Why do the poorer people, in every crowded city, live on the low grounds, while the well-to-do occupy the high, command- ing, and sightly knolls? Itis at bottom a question of economic ability, not of personal or racial tastes. The poorer immi- grants and the poorer natives also, with of course many ex- ceptions, settled in the woods because they could not afford to encounter the risk of taking an ideal farm in the ‘‘ Congress land’’ districts, nor could they afford to buy such land from speculators or from farmers. They took what was at hand, the heavily wooded lauds avoided by persons who were in position to pick and choose. In many cases they might have found lands on the open prairies, which, as we saw, were taken later than the other lands even by Americans who had some means. But the person without means would have been helpless in such a situation. He would need money to buy lumber both for building and for fencing, while in the timber his personal labor supplied these essentials, without cost, in the process which at the same time cleared his land. Besides, the timbered areas near Milwaukee had the advantage of a good market not only for the agricultural products to be raised after the work of clearing was done, but even for some of the incidental products of clearing, like cord-wood, pot and pearl ashes, charcoal, and later, railway ties. Where the timber was largely or partly merchantable pine or cedar, as in the counties north of Milwaukee along the lake, the saw- mills and shingle mills furnished a market. Thus the settler on a woods claim, if physically equal to the labor involved, might hope to supply his family with necessities at least from the forest products of his farm, while extending, year by year, his cultivated area. In the end his farm might even be a better one than if it had been on the prairie, for a portion of it was always fresh land, and there is some reason to believe that farms rescued from the forest by dint of the indomitable labor of the pioneers are generally more highly appreciated by the 40 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK second and third generations than are the prairie farms.1® But the creation of such farms was an heroic process, entail- ing real hardships, unremitting toil, and privations for many years. The forested area in the eastern portion of Wisconsin in- cluded the counties of Milwaukee, Washington, Ozaukee, She- boygan, Manitowoc, Kewaunee, Door, Brown, Calumet, with parts of Fond du Lac, Dodge, Jefferson, and Waukesha. Of these, several, including Door and Kewaunee, were still un- organized in 1850, and there was but a small population in Brown, Manitowoc, and Calumet. The census count, however, assigns a large majority of foreign born not only to Milwau- kee County, where the city had early attracted considerable numbers of Germans, but to Washington and Manitowoc also. The other counties of the group show native born majorities, though in Sheboygan, Brown, Fond du Lac, and Waukesha the foreign born number more than one-third of the total. On the other hand, the northern portion of the heavily forested area was a decade or more behind southeastern Wisconsin in its development. Manitowoc County, for example, where lumbering began very early, waited for the settlement of its farm lands on the heavy influx of Germans who arrived be- tween 1848 and 1854, and the same population element pressed into parts of Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, Brown, and other northern counties. A study of the early maps will show how definitely the loca- tions of agricultural settlements were determined by market- ing possibilities. Captain T. J. Cram’s map, 1839, reveals clearly that, outside of the mining region, the farm settle- ments were east of a line that followed Rock River to Water- town and ran thence north to Fond du Lac. But, in fact, only the portion of that strip which lay south of a line drawn from Watertown due east to the lake was actually settled except at intervals along Lake Michigan, if we except the beginnings of Fond du Lac itself and Oshkosh, with a few paper towns on #8 Joseph Schafer, ‘‘The Town of Newton, Manitowoc County,’’ in Wis. Mag. of Hist., v. 144-159. EARLY SETTLEMENTS 4 Lake Winnebago and, of course, Green Bay. To the west of our assumed line lay Madison, founded in 1837 as the capital of the Territory because its choice was the most satisfactory compromise between the lead mining region and the lake. There was not much farming done in that part of the Terri- tory for a number of years, nor in the prairies and openings northward from Madison to Fox River, nor in all of the coun- try north of the Military Road and west to the Mississippi. Such places as appear on the map along Wisconsin River— Prairie du Sac, Arena, Helena, ‘‘Muskoday’’—have signifi- cance merely as trading points in relation to the lead mines, not in relation to an agricultural community.’® It was early discovered that, while the Mississippi steamers were an inval- uable resource for bringing in necessaries, carrying away lead ore, etc., freight charges due to the difficulties of its navigation would prove prohibitive for shipping farm produce. Hence, only those living near enough to the lake ports to make pos- sible the delivery of wheat, by team over execrable roads, could really farm. Settlers in Rock River valley marketed their crops in that manner for more than a decade. Yet, even they complained that on account of the cost of trans- portation, the more they had to sell, the poorer they became; while those living farther west had practically no outlet either south or east.?° It was the coming of the railways which changed these un- toward conditions and made farming a normal occupation be- yond the limits of wagon transportation for farm products, at the same time giving a tremendous impulse to wheat rais- ing in the southeastern counties by reducing the cost of mar- keting.21 The Milwaukee and Mississippi Railway, begun in ” Helena was the place where Daniel Whitney’s shot tower was located. Lead brought there in wagons was cast and the shot carried away by steamer either via the Portage and Green Bay or via the Mississippi. Muscoda was the location of a smelter maintained at the river by William 8. Hamilton. The lead was brought by a down-hill haul from the prairie to the south. 7 Balthaser H. Meyer, ‘‘ Railway Legislation,’’ in Wis. Hist. Colls., xiv, 213. 1 See Josiah F. Willard, in Wisconsin State Agricultural Society, Transactions, 1853, 116. 42 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK 1849, built gradually westward by short sections and sent its surveyors forward ahead of the construction parties. Our record of land entries shows that prospective settlers usually reached an area about to be tapped by the railway very soon after the surveyors had located the road. Many made pur- chases before the road was built, but not long before. Pioneer- ing, for its own sake or as an expression of ingrained habit, was rather uncommon among the Easterners as well as among the foreigners who settled southern Wisconsin.*?? All wanted land, however, and the railways into new regions multiplied opportunities to secure the kinds of land most desired. Hence the spaces noted as open in 1839 are no longer unoccupied on the map of 1853. Hence, also, some spaces north of the Wis- consin, in Crawford, Richland, and Sauk counties, are shown to be settled at the later date. Since statehood was achieved in the year 1848, it is interest- ing to determine approximately how the agricultural settle- ments were distributed at that time. The political symbol of the rural settlement is the organized town, which usually, after a district of country became fully settled, was a survey- or’s township six miles square. These towns were organized in the various counties as they were needed to accommodate the people. Sometimes, in the beginning of settlement, a dis- trict embracing several townships, or even a whole county, was made a town for local government purposes, to be sub- divided as settlement thickened up. Hence, a map showing the organized towns with dates of their organization will describe the farming community of the state at the given date, and also show the progress of settlement. The accompanying map (Fig. 12) of southern Wisconsin shows (1) the surveyor’s townships. (2) In heavily shaded figures, the organization of towns by the legislature to 1848. These early towns, as will be seen, generally embraced several townships, sometimes “In this respect conditions in early Wisconsin contrasted sharply with those in the early stages of community building in some of the other states, like Ken- tucky, southern Illinois, and Missouri. However, is it not possible that in Ameri- can history we have generally overstressed the idea that men have chosen the life of backwoodsmen rather than accepted it as a matter of stern necessity? e FIG. 12. ORGANIZED TOWNS, 1848 EARLY SETTLEMENTS 43 entire counties. (3) In lighter shaded figures, the dates of organization of towns within older and more spacious towns. (4) Those portions, within the lines of the map, which re- mained unorganized as late as 1848, the date of the latest session laws examined in this study. All portions of the state falling outside of the lines of the map were unorganized. For example, the lead region, though longer settled, was not at this time organized into towns. This is generally attrib- uted to the fact that the dominant element there was ac- customed to the county form of local government. The consti- tution, however, provided for the uniform adoption of the town system over all the state, and the southwestern counties were soon accordingly subdivided into towns. However, as previously pointed out, the lead region was not primarily an agricultural section. The figures, therefore, which are in all cases the last two digits of the number representing the year (as ‘‘38’’ for ‘1838’’), constitute a fairly accurate picture of the manner in which settlement spread over the state and the rate at which it concentrated in given areas. The lines a—b and b-c enclose, with Lake Michigan and the Illinois boundary, the one great area which was sufficiently settled by 1838 to justify its sub- division into towns smaller than counties. That area em- braces the counties of Walworth, Racine, Kenosha, also Mil- waukee, Waukesha, and parts of Rock and Jefferson. Dane County, with Green and the northwestern part of Rock, re- mained undivided until 1846-47, portions of them longer. About Lake Winnebago were one town dating from 1840, two from 1842, and one from 1845. Aside from these, only two towns were organized prior to 1846 in the farming area north of the line a—b. Also, south of that line many of the separate erections came as late as 1845, 1846, and 1847 in the north- western part, while in the east, south, and southwest portions of the region they generally came earlier. The towns around Green Bay took care of the organization of the old French- Canadian trading settlements. In none of the towns organ 44 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK ized prior to 1846, save three or four in western Rock County, were the farmers living at a greater distance than sixty miles, in a direct line, from the lake. Those who were farming along or near the northern border of southern Wisconsin found a temporary market in the lumbering districts near at hand. The census map for 1850 reveals on the whole a similar result, but it does not discriminate between agricultural set- tlements and those incident to mining and lumbering. It shows an area along the lake coast, through Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee counties, which is peopled to the density of 45-90 to the square mile. That is of course due in part to the lake towns. The balance of what the preceding map shows to have been the farming area distinctively has 18-45. Most of the lead region, with considerable territory adjacent to it in the north and east, also the Sheboygan County area, has but 6-8. The rest, symbolizing merely pioneer beginnings north of the Wisconsin and near the river, the thinly populated old settlements about Green Bay, the several lumbering regions on the Wisconsin and the Chippewa, also on the Mississippi, and the Lake Superior colonies, has only 2-6 to the square mile. All of these areas except the lumbering tracts in the interior and those on the upper lake are located on the lime- stone formations. SOURCES In preparing this chapter I have used Ulysses S. Grant, Lead and Zinc Deposits (Madison, 1906) ; the Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin; various items and volumes; and the Wisconsin Domesday Book plats and records, MS., some of which are in press and will be issued as Wisconsin Domesday Book, Town Studies, I. CHAPTER III PIONEER ORIGINS The grand inquest which the United States government conducts every tenth year under the name of the Census results in the assembling and recording of a vast store of facts about the people of every state, as well as about farming con- ditions, manufacturing, and general business. In taking the seventh census (1850)! in Wisconsin there was usually an official enumerator for each organized town, while unorgan- ized territory was divided into districts, to each of which a census taker was assigned. These men traversed the country by the usual roads, visiting the roadside homes in regular order and making side trips to see those living off the roads. Sometimes they failed to find anyone who could give correct information at home; in such cases they filled in their blanks with the aid of the neighbors or left the families off the list entirely. They often set down incorrect statements about particular persons or families, either because their informa- tion was wrong or because they misunderstood it. The latter was especially apt to be true of foreign born families whose members could not speak English, whose names were strange, unpronounceable, and the spelling impossible to Americans. Occasionally they did not attempt to spell them but wrote down, instead of the name, the descriptive word ‘‘Dutchman’’ or ‘‘Norwegian.’’ Quite naturally, less care was exercised in obtaining accurately the facts about foreign born persons and families than those about the Americans and the English speaking British, Scotch, Welsh, or Irish.? Still, the census 1 The first census was taken in 1790. Then followed (2) 1800, (3) 1810, (4) 1820, (5) 1830, (6) 1840, (7) 1850. The census of 1920 is number 14. 2? But sometimes hundreds of names of Irish laborers were taken from the rolls of railway contractors for whom the men were working; in such cases ages, etc. were omitted. 46 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK gives us the best record we have, and it is an important source for the study of the population of the state.% Taking the grand total, as given by the census, of 305,391 inhabitants of Wisconsin in 1850, we could reasonably classify them as (1) American born; (2) English speaking foreign born; (8) non-English speaking foreign born. In the first class we would have approximately 198,000; in the second, 47,840; and in the third, 58,400. The last two numbers, added together, represent the aggregate of those born outside of the United States—106,240, or more than one-third the total population of the state. The first class may again be subdivided according to the regions in which the American born population originated, into Hastern and Northeastern, Southern and Southwestern, Northwestern, and Wisconsim. Placing these elements in the order of numerical importance, we have :4 Kagtern and. Northeastern . 6.5 jo... 10 -eya salvia ere «oye 103,371 WUSEOMSUM SOOT. cnet Lotus cise «me be pie. minie eve e.c he 63,015 INorthwestert sro: Us. Sh seithawses shee ee arene eee 21,367 Southern and Southwestern ease) eek oe 5,425 otal. cosccyet cy thvicpana tiie nea nah aires eh es 193,178 The second class, English speaking foreigners, divides read- ily into four groups, as follows :° MTS sae dacs, ore ea) ana rs ol Daaee ae ete recone care apes 21,043 Bagligh: 223.90: LORNA, TR ANE ER DS RVR 18,952 WWel gla: Fh 5k a cist thd bho: ditlene teh Gtenak ovale ete ta ke ie eee 4,319 GOLGI ch os uscatariajrarey wipyes ascyoiettaley olay sits age nee a ciel Meme ea 4 3,027 WPoteleiis oc sie sci ay asus ee cee eee 47,841 *The State Historical Society has the MS. agricultural schedules of the United States Census for Wisconsin for the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth censuses, and the population schedules for the seventh, eighth, and ninth. These schedules con- stitute the basis of much of our work on the Wisconsin Domesday Book. *JIn this tabulation we have disregarded numbers which were small and of no special significance. The resulting total is consequently about 4000 below the census total of American born. °The British-Americans, numbering 8277, were mainly French-Canadians and they are accordingly classed with the non-English speaking foreigners. PIONEER ORIGINS 47 The third class is composed of five groups: CHEYNEATIS th RRR ee oe ek Oe a ANE DR 38,054 Seandinavians (all Norwegians except 146 Swedes BRGR OG) LIBROS) hi cthe Aysiel daiclaseseapns aiecelemees ee pikes & 8,885 SAMS Hor GE ORES ane Ale eo aS REP Gee RUS otra 1,244 PG OMe MLOUETIGEDS) ci0iaeis oa a's a <)sydcarele ee allel apesanapeyer Sus 1,157 British-Americans (French-Canadians).......... 8,277 PR eFreuD ROe ty Pa TtP A Je, a 24a) ala bai ahs Sia ab ane a lee 57,617 A further analysis of the first group of class one, Americans born in the eastern and northeastern states, discloses the startling fact that 68,595 of the 103,370 came from New York. Vermont was second with 10,157, Pennsylvania third with 9570. Appreciable numbers came from Massachusetts and Maine. Of the third group, 21,367, those born in the north- western states, Ohio furnished more than one-half, or 11,402. Illinois contributed 5292, Indiana 2773, Michigan 1900. The southern and southwestern group (group four) is made up of small numbers contributed by the several states more or less equally, Virginia and Kentucky leading, each with less than 2000. Since the first of the four native groups was so predominantly large and since the non-English speaking for- elgners were of recent arrival in Wisconsin, it follows that the majority of the Wisconsin born, group two, must have been the children of the eastern and northeastern immigrants. The census, by counties, enables us to show with reasonable accuracy how these classes were distributed in 1850, and the map (Fig. 13) has been prepared for the purpose of revealing what elements predominated in each county. Of the 26 coun- ties for which figures were obtained, all but three—Manito- woe, Milwaukee, and Washington—have a majority of native born. And in 21 cases the two elements natives of New York and natives of Wisconsin combined make a majority of this native majority. The exceptions are the counties of Grant, Iowa, Lafayette, Green, and Richland. The last named has a very small number, and the case may as well be omitted as possessing no significance. In Green County 48 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK it becomes necessary to combine the Ohio born with those from New York and Wisconsin to make a majority of the native element, though the largest numbers came from New York and Wisconsin. Only the three lead region counties are peculiar. In Grant, the largest numbers were from Illinois, Wisconsin, and Ohio, these three aggre- gating more than one-half the total native population. In Iowa County the order is Illinois, Wisconsin, and New York; and in Lafayette, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Thus natives of Illinois in each of the three lead counties were nu- merically in the lead, and they were not first in number else- where. Moreover, the total number of persons born in Illinois who were residents of Wisconsin in 1850 was but 5292, and these three counties contained 2353 of these, or not many less than one-half. The lead region, therefore, was where the ‘‘Suckers’’ went. These Illinois natives were prevailingly from the southern half of that state, which had been settled from the Southwest and the South. They accordingly may be said to reinforce that element which found the lead region especially congenial, as the census shows. For example, there were only 1012 Missourians in Wisconsin in 1850. But the lead counties had 840 of them! The state harbored 1429 natives of Kentucky. The lead region furnished homes to 993 of them. Of Ten- nesseans Wisconsin had only 449. The lead region had ab- sorbed 317 of these. There were 322 North Carolinians in the state; in the lead region were 127. Virginia contributed to the state 1611, to the lead region 778. The other counties bor- dering on Illinois were fairly uniform in their American ele- ment, though Green County, the western portion of which was also in the.lead district, had not enough New Yorkers to make up, with those born in Wisconsin, one-half of that element.® In Rock, Walworth, Kenosha, and Racine the New Yorkers were very numerous. In Walworth they constituted more than one-half of the American born, in each of the other three ° The western half of Green County was in the lead mining region and had some Cornish miners as well as many Illinois people. PIONEER ORIGINS 49 counties nearly one-half. New Englanders, too, were rela- tively prominent. Rock County had nearly 1200 Vermonters and 1700 from the other five northeastern states. Walworth had 2250 from New England, Kenosha 1300, and Racine 1650. In all those counties the southern and southwestern element was negligible, and the northwestern element, aside from those. born in Ohio, nearly so. Not only was the lead region peculiar in the selection of its large majority of American settlers, but it was equally pecu- liar in the selection of foreign settlers. In all three of those counties natives of England were the dominant foreign ele- ment in their population complex, and each had a different second largest foreign element—Lafayette, Irish; Lowa, Welsh; and Grant, German. Now the English, while making the second largest number in the foreign element of five or six of the other counties, stood first in only one of them.? The reason for the presence of 6670 Englishmen in these three counties was precisely that they contained the lead mines. These English were in part smelters and mine bosses who came from Yorkshire, but chiefly miners from the tin mining district of Cornwall. Thus it is seen that in this interesting section of the state, where the rock strata were warped, cracked, and creviced by geologic forces in the primordial ages of the earth, and these apertures filled with ore, which men learned to extract, there was developed, on the basis of a peculiar industry, a society which differed widely in its compo- sition from that of the strictly farming districts. When at a later time the farming interest in the lead bearing area became dominant, this social condition, as we shall see, was destined to change. Many new people came in, but large numbers of the one-time miners settled down to the less venturous and exciting occupation of agriculturists. In its foreign element Green County had 364 Swiss. These were the nucleus of the noted New Glarus colony, begun in ™ Walworth, aside from two cases of counties having insignificant populations in 1850—Richland and Adams. ®*Louis A. Copeland, ‘‘The Cornish Element in Southwestern Wisconsin,’’ in Wis. Hist. Colls., xiv, 301-334. 50 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK 1845 by emigrants from the canton of Glarus, Switzerland.® In 1850 their number amounted to one-twentieth of the total population of the county, and in 1890 it was about one-third.’° Here is a striking instance of the survival of a foreign element under conditions such as existed in early Wisconsin. This change illustrates also the trend in Wisconsin away from the social dominance of the eastern Americans to that of the de- scendants of foreign immigrants. However, the process was one extending over many years, and the influence of the Kast- erners was in many respects rendered permanent through educational, religious, and social institutions which they in- troduced. In Rock County’s foreign element the lead was already taken by the Norwegians, who numbered 1241. The nearest second was the Irish, with 915. Following them, in regular order, came English, Canadians, Scotch, Germans, and Welsh. The Norwegian emigration to America is said to date from the coming of the ‘‘sloop folk’’ from Stavangar in 1825, and the forming of a settlement near Rochester, New York. In 1834 several families removed to Ottawa in the Fox River valley of Illinois, and thither came many emigrants from the old world in 1836 and 1837. The Ottawa colony was the west- ern hive from which the Norwegians swarmed, mainly west and south, during the early forties. Others, coming to Mil- waukee in 1839, formed colonies in Waukesha and Rock coun- ties. Racine County also received a goodly number and soon became a mecca for Norwegians.'!_ The census of 1850 shows the three counties of Dane, Rock, and Racine to have had the largest numbers, in that order—Dane, 2779; Rock, 1241; and Racine, 678. The town of Norway in Racine County was set- * See the admirable history of the founding of the New Glarus colony, by John Luchsinger, in Wis. Hist. Colls., viii, 411-445; also, the same author’s ‘‘ Planting of the Swiss Colony at New Glarus,’’ in ibid., xii, 335-382. ” Another Swiss colony dwelt, in 1850, in the southeastern part of Sauk County. The census assigns 331 persons of Swiss birth to that county. The Sauk County Swiss colony was the birthplace of ex-Governor Emanuel Philipp, whose parents were of that immigration. “George T. Flom, A History of Norwegian Immigration to the United States (Iowa City, Ia., 1909), 121-123. KCRAWFORD TOTAL NATIVE NY WIS., OA ENGLISH GERMAN BRO N TOTA 6215 ATIVE 385) NY, WIS. 2712 GERMAN 649 CANADIAN 623 Va BADAMS MANITOWOC es eas OTAL 3702 TOTAL 187 (ATIVE tet TOTAL +4 NATIVE IMAL Ny ig eee NX, WISIIAS] CORMAN 1326) NX, WIS. 71 GERMAN 2&7. IRISH 23 ENGLISH 23 CANADIAN 305) NY., WIS 4120 TRISH 539 ENGLISH 512% FOND DU TOTAL NATIVE MARQUETTE TOTAL 8632 MATIVE 6910 N.Y, Wis. 4247 ENGLIBX 484 IRISH 379, NUY., WIS. 6+*+o GERMAN 2630 IRISH RICHLAND TOTAL 9565 NATIVE ©188 TOTAL TOTAL aga Ive 3229 Nee eek | Nee OTAL —s-1. 9399 NATIVE 330] NY, wis 1694 pea r 8379 [NATIVE 7252 WELSH 673 N.Y, WIS GERMAN 342 7 GERMAN 2900 NY. Wis. 5952 GERMAN 92089 NY., WIS., IND.,ILL 4-81 IRISH 1276 GERMAN 18 ENGLISH 1855 ENGLISH 147 IRISH TOTAL 15315 TOTAL 19303 10450 Native 11803 NATIVE NY, wis O487 Hd ean NORWEGIAN 2800 TN dablen BAY NIG 2 Ee ILL. WIS. N.Y EN 1085 SERMAN 20291 iRisn 18 6G . . 3191 GLISH IRISH 914) ENGLISH VAL ENGLISH 0 The «ihn? ot Ste aa Nat ‘ b | ise”. aaapant - . Log ue he ets A ll ey a7 TIUDAAM! 1 on : ‘ 4 Neen nn Enel Dw ee OeToT ie ean . | hd - sta Pit ( “> SRA tii Ce | se oh ft - a Asidaud f P . gel were ie * : “a ‘* eat cass 5 ine. 4 ht : ie Pe hie aL my TO aMUsOop io fy Powel Pee | Bite epee me | gase * fawaaHo ia) ue iW lace: sArat! me | a a 0 haa ta tT ie iS SVIFAM) re 0 NA he Geant aia ate Hee ge ane ‘ " . phe aie % =e MAMMTRO bap th, A ieee OM. ” : cones te sidintaulln | venhes loupe GAR Fortunately for us, the demand in that country began to exceed the home sup- ply almost at the exact moment when the supply with us began greatly to exceed the home demand. Population in Great Britain, after the close of the Napoleonic wars, under the stimulus of manufacturing and commerce went forward with mighty strides. The additions, however, were mainly in the towns and in the manufacturing counties, while the rural popu- lation grew but slowly or not at all. By the census of 1831 almost exactly two-thirds of the British population were living in towns, and the proportion thereafter tended to become more unfavorable to agriculture. In consequence the British farm- ers, who had customarily supplied the home demand for wheat, or nearly so, fell behind the requirements of the nation even with the stimulus of the ‘‘corn laws,’’ which prohibited importations except in times of scarcity. Then ensued the notable and tremendous campaign against the corn laws and finally, in 1846, their repeal. The industrial classes, demand- ing cheap food, had triumphed over the agricultural classes >The production of 1849 was considerably lower than that of 1848 and 1847. *See William Trimble, ‘‘ Historical Aspects of the Surplus Food Production,’’ American Historical Association, Annual Report, 1918, 223-239. 5 Colonial America had shipped to Great Britain as well as to the British, French, and Spanish West Indies. WHEAT FARMING 83 demanding an assured market and a high price for wheat (ae corn’’). In addition to the disproportionate growth of the non-rural population, two other causes in Great Britain affected the home supply of wheat, in proportion to demand. These were the withdrawal of land from agriculture and an important, though gradual, change in the character of British agriculture. In the twenty years between 1851 and 1871 the total area of farm land taken into town limits and absorbed by railroads for rights of way, etc. amounted to nearly 700,000 acres. This was considerably in excess of the extent of new enclosures authorized during the same period, while the average value of the withdrawn lands, for cropping purposes, was naturally much higher than of that newly enclosed. During the period under discussion improvements in farming were numerous. Yet the agricultural classes were called upon to endure several sharp and general crises, and whenever a severe depression came it was observed that the grain growing districts suffered more than those sections where livestock was the dominant interest.’ Such practical demonstrations gave point to the exhortations for better farming, with more thorough cultiva- tion, fertilization of the soil, proper rotation of crops, feeding of livestock, and the like. The result was.a more or less uni- form tendency away from the emphasis on wheat growing, which had become something of an obsession under the arti- ficial stimulation of the corn laws. More and more attention was centered upon the production of meat and wool. This tendency ultimately became so powerful that, between 1871 and 1891, the area devoted to wheat culture declined from 3,572,000 acres to 1,889,000 acres, or 47.1 per cent, while the acreage of hay increased 20.2 per cent and of pasture 30.7 per cent. Great Britain, therefore, as a predominantly industrial nation, which for industrial reasons adopted the free trade * Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers, Reports of Commissions, House of Com- mons, 1875, ii, 3. ™W. H. R. Curtler, A Short History of English Agriculture (Oxford, Eng., 1909), 285. 8 Sir William Crookes, op. cit., 122. 84 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK policy, was the natural market for America’s surplus wheat, and became, during the years when that surplus grew to im- mense proportions, the arbiter of prices to the American wheat farmer. At the time Wisconsin began to raise wheat as a business, the outstanding producers among the older states were Penn- sylvania, New York, Virginia, and Ohio. Of the 85,000,000 bushels in the crop of 1840 (or 1839)° these four states are credited with over 53,000,000. Maryland, Tennessee, Ken- tucky, Indiana, and Illinois yielded 22,000,000 more, while the remaining 12,000,000 was distributed, in small amounts, among the other twenty-one states. The older states made shift to hold their own for some years, but there was little expansion save during the food crisis years of the Civil War, and mean- time the non-agricultural populations of these same states were increasing so rapidly as to provide in large part a home market for the wheat raised within their own borders. This left to the new western states the opportunity of providing a supply for the foreign trade, and the eagerness with which that opportunity was improved the story of Wisconsin wheat growing during half a century will show. The New York farmers, the Pennsylvania farmers, the Ohio farmers who came to Wisconsin in the early rush of settlement were by habit and tradition primarily wheat growers. The New Englanders had been partially weaned from the business, but, like the others, they had a lively appreciation of the ease with which wealth in the form of wheat could be extracted from the limestone soils of Wisconsin’s prairies and openings. The problem was to get the soil under cultivation with the least practicable delay, and this, on the prairies at least, was accomplished with remarkable celerity. To illustrate, the farm lands of Mount Pleasant Town, Racine County, began to be claimed in 1836.1° In the season of 1837 some claim- holders (who had not yet bought their lands) harvested 1000 *It is not quite clear whether the figures are for the one year or for the other. ” Except a few pieces which were claimed the previous year. WHEAT FARMING 85 to 2000 bushels of wheat.1!' In the summer of 1844 two young men, with ten yoke of oxen, and a couple of boys to drive, broke up in a few weeks 200 acres of Rock County prairie which they sowed to wheat. The next year they harvested their erop with a machine and secured 5000 bushels, a part of which was sold at Racine at sixty-two and one-half cents per bushel.’* These figures could be matched from other quarters, and they suggest that it was probably not uncommon for a farmer to break up and sow to wheat 25 to 50 acres during his first sea- son’s operations. After that his fields expanded rapidly. The custom was to sow wheat year after year on the same ground, so that, in general, the increments of ‘‘new breaking”’ simply augmented the area sown to wheat, other crops like oats and potatoes occupying very minor portions of the arable, and hay being derived from the natural meadows or marshes. In case the land was openings instead of prairie—and many at first preferred this type, believing it to be better, especially for winter wheat—the timber was quickly chopped off to make rails for fencing. The ground, being soft and protected by a layer of humus, was easier to break than the prairie sod. The tree stumps interfered with the plow, but these either were left to rot away or were gradually grubbed out. Smaller trees, of which the openings had but few, and brush like the ubiquitous hazel were cleared away before starting the plow. Thus in a brief span, almost as if by some sort of magic, were the prairies and openings of southern Wisconsin trans- formed into fields of billowing wheat. The study of towns from the charts and plats reveals the dynamics of the proc- ess.13 As early as the census of 1850, the improved lands in the farms of Mount Pleasant amounted on the average to four times the acreage of the unimproved. That was an excep- tional case, for it appears that no other town at that census period showed as high a proportion of improved land. Yet, 4 Racine Argus, Mar. 10, 1838. 2U. 8. 29th Cong. 1st Sess. Sen. Doc. 307, p. 138. See agricultural charts of twenty-five towns, also Atlas, Farms and Farmers of 1860, in Domesday Book, Town Studies, I (in press). 86 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK four of the eight towns in Racine County had half or more than half of their farm lands improved, the four together showing 30,205 acres improved to 28,541 unimproved. The other towns, lying farther from the lake shore, were less developed. For the county as a whole the figures are 63,338 improved and 82,947 unimproved. For Kenosha, the other lake-shore prairie county, the totals are 50,987 and 79,862 respectively. Surprising as it may seem, Rock County, whose farmers had a haul of 60 to 100 miles to the lake ports, already had in its made farms more improved land than unimproved. The figures are 143,235 and 187,111 respectively. The ex- planation is found in the extensive and beautiful prairie area bordered by and interspersed with timber, combined with easily cleared openings, which made that county so enticing to the early settlers; and also, in its relatively small amounts of marsh land.14 Seven other counties—Dane, Grant, Green, Lafayette, Milwaukee, Walworth, and Waukesha—each showed improvements in 1850 which exceeded a third of all lands included in their farms. All of these except Milwaukee had much prairie and openings.'® Some of the counties, espe- cially Grant, Dane, and Green, had within their boundaries considerable areas of rough hill land, but these were not yet largely occupied for farming purposes; so that in all cases, practically, we are dealing with farms which are in process of making on the prairies or in the smooth or rolling openings. These totals indicate how rapidly such lands were being brought into requisition for the growing of wheat, and the totals of the eighth census (1860) produce a still more striking impression. By that time the ten counties listed above had “Tf the marshes which were mowed or pastured had been described as im- proved land, as tame grass meadows and pastures were, the unimproved in all of the southeastern counties would have shrunk appreciably. 15 Milwaukee’s unusual commercial advantages account for the rapid im- provement of her forested lands, which is an exceptional case. Comparison with Illinois is interesting. In 1850 the 57 Illinois counties show 11 which have a balance in favor of improved land; 47 others have less than one-half their farm lands improved; 7 have one-third. In 1860, 41 of the 62 counties in Illinois had a majority of their farm lands improved. WHEAT FARMING 87 a combined improved area totaling 1,693,491 as against an un- improved of 1,338,750. If we eliminate the counties of Dane, Grant, and Green, where many new farms were making on rough land much of which would never be cultivated, the totals for the other seven counties would be 1,060,587 and 675,590. That is, the improved land in those counties was to the unim- proved in the proportion of 10 to 6.7. This is a higher average of improved land than either Ohio or Pennsylvania, as a whole, had in 1850 in their farms. One wonders how a farmer in 1837 harvested a crop of wheat yielding 2000 bushels. This represented at the very least 50 acres and probably more. The harvesting implements were as yet the old cradle for cutting and the wooden rake for forming the sheaves. A strong man could cradle two to three acres per day, and a few celebrated cradlers of the pioneer time had records of four acres or even more. Per- haps two and one-half acres would be a rather high average. At that rate a ficld of 50 acres would supply full work for one man for twenty days. Four men, how- ever, could cut the crop in five days, and that period—or say a week—the farmer might ordinarily count on before the grain became too ripe to handle without waste. Allowing two binders to each cradler, the requisite harvest help would number at least twelve men. During the early years newly arrived American immigrants, who were looking for claims, were utilized for harvest labor, while later the immigrations from Europe supplemented the native supply. But often a scarcity of labor was experienced in given communities. The harvest was the harvest; on it depended the prosperity not alone of the farmer but of the merchant, the doctor, and every- body who had a stake in the community. So it is not surpris- ing that every able-bodied person, male and female, was at times requisitioned to help save the wheat crop. Wisconsin was settled precisely at the time when new in- ventions in harvesting machinery began to make their appear- ance after ages of dependence on implements little more com- 88 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK plex than the sickle with which Ruth gleaned in the fields of Boaz. Cyrus McCormick patented his reaper in 1834. The McCormick Reaper Company began to manufacture machines at Chicago in 1846,1° and by 1850 this and other reapers were generally used in the prairie fields of Wisconsin. George Esterly of Heart Prairie, Walworth County, invented a reaper which became very popular. The Civil War, which absorbed so large a proportion of the labor force,!’ made the use of reapers compulsory even on comparatively small farms.'® It is not usual to associate the idea of bonanza farming with Wisconsin. Yet we are given, in the newspapers, a harvesting scene of the year 1860 which suggests the Red River valley wheat industry of ten, twenty, and thirty years later. The DeForest farm in Dane County contained 2200 acres, of which 1000 was in grain. The wheat acreage was 800, bearing a crop in that golden year estimated at 25,000 bushels. In harvest- ing his wheat Mr. DeForest employed eight reaping machines and sixty men.!® The reapers were doubtless of the hand- raking variety, requiring two men to operate them. Five binders could keep up with a machine, and if four men were kept steadily at work ‘‘shocking up,’”’ the sixty hands are accounted for. The self-raking reaper, the Marsh harvester, ** Reuben G. Thwaites, ‘‘Cyrus Hall McCormick,’’ in Wis. Hist. Soe., Proc., 1908, 242ff; also, letter of Herbert A. Kellar, McCormick Library, Chicago, dated May 6, 1922. 7

Since the prairies and openings of the southeastern part of the state were earliest brought into farms and enclosed, it was there that progress in livestock - improvement first became practicable. Passing over the intervening years until we reach the ex- hibits of 1860, we find 22 shorthorns receiving awards and several others ‘‘honorable mention.’?’ The most prominent. exhibitors were Richard Richards and John P. Roe of Racine ‘It was many years before public opinion demanded and enforced a law which forbade owners to allow bulls to run at large. See Wisconsin, Laws of 1870, - chap. 93. 116 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK County, Seymour Brooks of Hast Troy, Walworth County, and.C. H. Williams of Excelsior, Sauk County. All of these men were at that time recognized breeders of registered stock. According to the Herd Book of 1859, Richards was owner of 4 pedigreed bulls and 6 cows. Roe had 3 pedigreed bulls and 9 cows; while Brooks had, in 1859, 1 bull and 1 cow® and Will- iams 1 bull and 5.cows.* None of the other exhibitors of 1860 are named in the Herd Book, though several other Wisconsin breeders appear in it. By that time we can claim for Wis- consin a definite status in the breeding of purebred short- horns, and we find equally good evidence to prove the interest in Devons. There were also, among the cattle, a few Alder- neys, Ayrshires, and Herefords. After 1860 the breeders of shorthorn cattle increased very rapidly in numbers and also became widely distributed over the state. It is not possible, in this brief sketch, to notice many individuals. Racine County continued to hold a very prominent position. Richard Richards, who was in 1859 one of the best known Wisconsin shorthorn breeders, increased his herd gradually until by 1866 it counted 24 head of registered stock. But he dropped out of that department shortly after 1870, devoting his energies and great ability to the breeding of fine horses and fine pigs. Mr. George Murray of Racine was owner of a group of shorthorns which, under the name of the Slausondale Herd, was famed not merely in Wisconsin but all over the country as one of the choicest herds in Amer- ®‘ Mr. Brooks, who was the son of a successful New York breeder, had a dis- persal sale in June, 1857, and presumably sold most of his herd of 25 mature ghorthorns and 20 calves. See Wis. Farmer, 1857, 213-214, 223. His herd was described by the editor of the Farmer as ‘‘undoubtedly the largest and best bred herd in the state.’’ He adds: ‘‘If scattered through the different counties and used judiciously, it will tend to materially improve our stock.’’ It must be noted that though the Herd Book of 1857 fails to credit Seymour Brooks with any reg- istered animals, his bull ‘‘Samson,’’ No. 2172, winner of the first prize at the state fair at Milwaukee in 1856 and at Janesville in 1857, is credited to William Ellsworth of Mayfield, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. This is an instance to show how slowly the records adjusted themselves to changes of ownership and it suggests that Brooks’s entire herd were probably Herd Book animals. ™C. H. Williams, according to the Herd Book of 1857, was owner of 9 registered shorthorns. In 1858, at the state fair held at Madison, his Kentucky red bull ‘‘Paris,’’ No. 1995 (see eut) took first premium in the shorthorn class. PARIS—DURHAM, OWNED BY C. H. WILLIAMS, EXCELSIOR, SAUK COUNTY First prize at state fair, 1858 BLOOMFIELD 3D—DEVON, OWNED BY THOMAS REYNOLDS, MADISON First prize at state fair, 1858 PRIZE WINNING SPANISH MERINOS Bred and owned by Charles M. Clark, Whitewater, about 1875 <5 SEES — a ncRAVEO BY F DRA wi BENCRAVED Tem BLOOD HORSE—KING OF CYMRY From State Agricultural Society Transactions, 1854-57 IMPROVED LIVESTOCK 117 ica. In April, 1873, Mr. Murray held a public auction at his farm in Mount Pleasant, when visiting buyers were said to have numbered above 400 from both the United States and Canada. At that sale 21 cows and heifers brought the sum of $18,640, or an average of $887; while 9 bulls were sold for $5565, or an average of $619. This was one of the most suc- cessiul sales held in America in that period. Mr. Murray bought choice animals in Canada, in Kentucky, and indeed wherever he could find individuals of the types and the breed- ing calculated to improve his herd. Throughout the decade of the seventies his stables and pastures just outside the city limits of Racine were a mecca for shorthorn breeders and fanciers, though his stock was rather too high priced to be available to the ordinary farmer. Most of the prize winning horses exhibited at the Wisconsin state fair up to the Civil War were Morgans and Blackhawks. The latter were simply one strain derived by a process of care- ful breeding (with ‘‘blood-horse’’ stock) from the original ‘« Justin Morgan,’’ progenitor of the Morgan line. There were a few entries of blood horses, as the English thoroughbreds were called in the Transactions, but only a few. R. M. Wheel- er’s ‘‘Hambletonian,’’ referred to above, was brought from Vermont in 1850. He traced back through the English ‘‘Hclipse’’ to Darley’s ‘‘ Arabian,’’ 1700. On the side of the dam, however, his breeding was in doubt. Another blood horse, ‘‘King of Cymry,’’ was imported into Wisconsin in 1854 by Captain McKinnon of the British navy and kept at Menasha. In his veins was some of the best blood represented on the English turf, and the claim was made, perhaps with justice, that he was the ‘‘ first English thoroughbred horse ever imported into the state.’ The problem of pedigrees in the ease of horses entered as blood horses was so serious that as late as 1858 the committee of judges ruled out the only two ® See Racine Journal, Apr. 16, 1873. Charles M. Clark of Whitewater, who was a rival shorthorn breeder, told the writer that at a later time he saw Murray sell at a Chicago sale his famous old cow ‘‘ Duchess of Thorndale’’ with two of her heifers and one bull for more than $20,000! The heifers each brought $8000. * Statement of George O. Tiffany, Wis. State Agric. Soc., Trans., 1854-57, 512. 118 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK exhibits in that class because their pedigrees were unsatis- factory. On the other hand, as early as 1852 T. J. Wood of Baraboo exhibited ‘‘Vermont Morgan,’’ represented to have been of pure Morgan breeding in the Gifford Morgan and Sherman Morgan lines. Another Morgan sire, ‘‘General Gifford,’’ was brought from Vermont about 1854 by John M. Clark of White- water. That horse was winner of the first prize at the state fair in 1857, where he competed with two Morgan stallions and seven Blackhawks. In 1858 there were again exhibited two Morgan stallions, one owned in Fond du Lac County, the other in Milwaukee. Both were approved as to pedigree. That year there was a notable showing of Blackhawks, ‘‘some of them splendid specimens of that stock—probably equal to any that have ever been produced.’° Among the prize winners were stallions from Waukesha, Dodge, Racine, and Milwau- kee counties. The Morgan (and allied Blackhawk) blood became so widely diffused through southern Wisconsin that, during the Civil War, the cavalry regiments from this state employed as mounts to some extent the medium sized, but strong, spirited, wiry, and fleet footed chargers descended from that famous Green Mountain stock."' In the years following the war occurred a remarkable de- velopment in horse breeding for the turf and for pleasure driving. The American thoroughbred, especially the horse of Kentucky breeding, was the favorite for these purposes. Interest was keen in every portion of the state, stimulated no doubt by the fairs and driving associations;'* in the actual business of producing fine horses, however, Racine County was easily the leader. Men from that county visited the cele- Report of the Committee on Blood Horses, official By Andrew Proudfit, ehairman. Wis. Farmer, 1856, 546-549. An admirable, informative report. 4 Ex-Governor Hoard told of his eseape from rebel troopers through the fleet- ness and endurance of his Morgan mount. ® The first law authorizing the ‘‘incorporation of associations for improving the breed of horses’’ was published April 1, 1859. IMPROVED LIVESTOCK 119 brated studs of Kentucky and brought back promising colts.1? Richard Richards, Murray and Kelley, J. I. Case, A. P. Dickey, Stephen Bull, William L. Utley, Gilbert Adams, and others entered the lists as breeders of thoroughbreds, and soon it was said, probably with truth, that Racine County had more standard bred horses than all the rest of the state taken together. The Racine breeders sold many animals for shipment into the western states. Customers came from Minnesota, Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas, Iowa, Colorado, Wyoming, and Mon- tana, occasionally from the Pacific states also. For example, in 1871 A. P. Dickey shipped 17 head of horses to Denver, Colorado, among them the stallion ‘‘Red Cloud,’’ which was sold for $3000.14 Richards owned ‘‘ Bellfounder’’ as early as 1866. He secured the more noted sire ‘‘Swigert’’ (see por- trait, p. 125) apparently in 1869 from the Alexander farm in Kentucky.1> Within a few years he was shipping colts to most of the states named.’® After awhile J. I. Case, the man- ufacturer, who was a great horse fancier, had perhaps the largest, most valuable stud in the state. There were, how- ever, as might be expected, prominent breeders in other counties. For example, Mr. Richard Pheil of Milwaukee de- veloped about 1865 a fine stud which included ‘‘Escape,’’ ‘*Bill Tenney,’’ ‘‘Crichton,’’ and ‘‘Riga,’’ also a number of thoroughbred mares. Other Milwaukee men owned excellent individual horses, as did men in other cities, so that by 1880 or thereabouts it had become comparatively easy for farmers in almost every part of southern Wisconsin to gain access to thoroughbreds for breeding purposes. It must be said, however, that no very general movement to build up the equine stock of Wisconsin farms by crossing *See Racine Journal, July 26, 1871, for an account of Dr. Champlin (veteri- nary surgeon) paying a visit to the Alexander farm and returning with ‘‘three blooded colts.’’ * Racine Journal, Feb. 28, 1871. “ Western Farmer, 1869, 116. 1® As shown by his account book (MS.), in possession of Mrs. Laura Richards, Madison, Wis. 120 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK common animals with thoroughbreds ever took place, frequent as such crosses were in given localities.1* The common horses of Wisconsin, derived from various sources—Canada, Penn- sylvania, New York, and the prairies of the West—were pre- vailingly of very moderate size and weight. A farm team weighing 1200 pounds apiece was the exception rather than the rule. They ranged from 900 to 1300, the average probably being around 1100. It was because of the light weight of the horses that oxen continued to be used for the heavy, slow work of clearing and breaking. And even with the lands mostly under cultivation, farmers recognized the desirability of having horses of greater weight and strength than the com- mon stock for the regular farm work. Since heavy horses also found a readier market, at good prices, than any other type save extra fine matched carriage teams, an added impulse was given to breeding for size and weight, for which purpose the thoroughbreds were not particularly beneficial. When breeders began seriously to study the farmer demand, they met it by importing purebred animals of the heavy draft breeds, especially Normans or Percherons, and Clydesdales, afterwards adding also Belgians and English shires. The response was immediate. Activity in importing and breeding draft horses grew apace, and it spread over the state much more generally and more quickly than did the breeding of thoroughbreds. The counties of Rock, Columbia, Sauk, Dane, Dodge, Waukesha, and Milwaukee, aside from the southeast- ern counties, competed for recognition at the fairs. In 1880, for the first time, the State Agricultural Society offered prizes for draft horses under two classifications: (1) Norman; (2) Clydesdale and others. The winning Normans came from Janesville, Dayton, Stoughton, Okee, Ableman, and Mazo- manie; the winning Clydesdales (and others) from Madison and Brooklyn in Dane County, and from Illinois. To show that Racine was not inadaptable, we find George Murray and Richard Richards, erstwhile breeders of thor- Like Racine County, where farm auction offerings of livestock were apt to specify colts sired by some great trotter like Swigert. IMPROVED LIVESTOCK 12 oughbreds, carrying away prizes on their Clydesdales, the former in 1875 taking not only general prizes but also the ‘*breeder’s special premium’’ for the best draft stallion of any breed and the second best mare of any breed, also sweep- stakes on horses for best stallion and five of his colts, and best mare with foal by her side. A son of Richard Richards, Grif- fith Richards, residing at Cambria, Columbia County, also captured prizes with his Clydesdales. Within twenty years after 1880 the farm stock of horses had become profoundly and almost universally modified as a result of the multiplication of draft breed sires and their general distribution over the state. Nearly every farm had its ‘‘big team’’ or teams for the heavy farm work and for heavy hauling. Horses weighing 1400 pounds became as common as those of 1200 had been earlier. Driving horses, which continued to be useful for a time and somewhat divided the interest with draft horses, have declined in importance since the coming of the automobile. A question has arisen whether addition of weight has not actually gone so far as to be uneconomical, particularly since the advent of the tractor, which affords relief from the heav- iest farm draying. For some years a movement has been in progress looking toward a different type in the breeding of farm horses. It is now maintained, by some experts, that crosses between the large farm mares, compounded mainly of draft horse blood and the common stock, and purebred Morgan sires will produce the ideal farm horse. Many such are already to be found—fine, well knit, clean limbed, warm blooded animals weighing 1200 to 1400 pounds, fit for the plow, the dray, the self-binder, and all other farm work, and not ill adapted to the saddle or the road harness.18 While breeders very properly place the emphasis on pure- bred animals as the surest means of improving the quality of eattle, horses, and other livestock, it should be noted that very *It may well be that, the problem of size being solved through the persistent use of draft sires, ‘‘blood horses’’ hereafter may be much more sought after than formerly for farm breeding purposes. 122 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK real improvement resulted also from the use of grades and crossbreeds. For a good many years the average Wisconsin farmer was loath to incur the expense involved in the use of high priced breeding animals. A purebred shorthorn calf might cost from $50 to $200; a grade calf would cost, say, $10. The temptation, accordingly, was overpowering to take the cheaper. This made farm breeding an uncertain process, with benefits far below those attending the general use of purebred males; but the net result was a decided improve- ment over the old-time ‘‘scrub’’ stock. Historically, it was very largely, even mainly, by the employment of such grades that the first general improvement of farm cattle came about, and the same statement will cover the case of farm horses, though when we come to the smaller and less expensive farm animals—pigs and sheep—we find a more general tendency to employ purebreds.’® Wool production in Wisconsin up to about 1870 followed closely the course of that business in the country as a whole. Wool growing for household industrial uses had been common from early colonial times, but wool growing as a commercial enterprise developed in the United States between the years 1808 and 1830.7° The influence bringing about the change was the development, partly through war and embargo, partly through the protection of infant manufactures, of the woolen industry as carried on by the factory system. Coincident with the beginning of the American factory production of woolens came the importations of merinos from Spain, begun by Con- sul William Jarvis, which totaled in about thirty months nearly 20,000 head. For a few years, under the stimulus of high prices for fine grades of wool, the country went mad over * Anyone who: was familiar with the farm stock of horses of forty or fifty years ago can recall individuals that were specially agreeable to ride or drive, others that were famous emergency ‘‘pullers,’’ still others that could carry the plow at a good clip twelve hours per day. By tracing their descent through sires advertised as ‘‘half-Canadian,’’ ‘‘part Blackhawk,’’ or ‘‘ three-quarter blood Morgan,’’ such characteristics are often explainable. See L. G. Connor, ‘‘A Brief History of the Sheep Industry in the United States,’’ Amer. Hist. Assoc., Annual Report, 1918. This is an invaluable survey of the field and is my chief reliance for the general facts referred to under this topic. IMPROVED LIVESTOCK 125 merinos. Fabulous prices were paid for breeding stock. Flocks of purebreds became especially numerous in Vermont, the home state of Mr. Jarvis, but many were started in other states also.21. Then a period of manufacturing depression, due in part to English competition in woolens, forced down the value of sheep and resulted in sending many thousands of common and grade merino animals into the West, the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, and [Illinois gaining largely therefrom. This created the sources from which the supply of common sheep in the forties and fifties reached Wisconsin. In 1837, when Wisconsin began to settle up from the Hast, there were in the United States, it is estimated, 18,000,000 sheep, of which the three states New York, Vermont, and Pennsylvania had one-half. The factory demand having risen steadily for some years, the finest wool was then bringing up to 72 cents per pound and wool growing, naturally, was re- garded as a most profitable branch of farming. This con- tinued to be the case for about ten years and explains why it was that Wisconsin farmers, the moment wheat crops began to deteriorate, turned their attention to wool growing. It ex- plains why for some years the interest in good sheep was so much keener and more general than the interest in better cattle, horses, or pigs. Means of transportation from many parts of the West being almost non-existent, the market for wool in those sec- tions was correspondingly poor and the prices of sheep low. That is why so many flocks, numbering thousands, were driven north from Illinois and Indiana to be sold to Wisconsin farm- ers at prices which made their purchase a strong temptation, especially since wool could be shipped cheaply from the lake ports via the Erie Canal to the eastern market. Under these conditions, wool growing began in Wisconsin a few years after the first settlements were made. It is said in 1845 there "Not infrequently as much as $1000 was paid for a ram. The furore became so great that, it is said, a good mother in Pennsylvania called her tenth son “Merino,’’ as fathers in 1856 named male children ‘‘Fremont’’ and in 1860 *¢Lincoln.’’ 124 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK were not over 30,000 head of sheep in the territory, yet in 1850 the census taker found 125,000 head.?? We have already noted the prominence given to sheep at the first state fair in 1851. The merinos, paular merinos, and Saxons, exhibited from Kenosha County and from Fond du Lac, were a pledge of the effort at improvement of the stock of sheep which had already begun, purebreds being brought from Vermont, Massachusetts, and New York. It was only a few years until Wisconsin breeders were prepared to supply breeding stock of both sexes and all ages to their fellow farmers. The records of state fairs prior to 1860 testify to the existence of purebred merinos in Kenosha, Waukesha, Fond du Lac, Walworth, Milwaukee, and Dodge counties. Doubtless there were flocks in other counties as well. Long wools were exhibited mainly from Dane County. The county of Walworth became the leading county in the production of fine wool sheep, and in that county the town of Whitewater was the most noticeable competitor at the state fairs, her breeders usually numbering four or five.22 In 1850 Whitewater had 3282 sheep, more than those in any other of 10 towns. In 1860 the number was 2734, which again was the largest number assigned by the census to any one of 22 towns. In 1870 the number had risen to 6030. Whitewater’s nearest competitor that year was Sugar Creek, in the same county, where the number of sheep was 5449, while in Mount Pleasant, Racine County, it was 5432. From the census returns of wool and of sheep one can com- pute, roughly, the average yield per head, and this enables us to determine where the improved sheep were to be found at the census dates. In 1870 Whitewater sheep clipped, on the average, nearly 6 pounds, and Mount Pleasant sheep about the same. .In Brookfield, Waukesha County, the average was 4.7, in Bangor less than 3, in Castle Rock 2 pounds. Empire The importations became even more numerous in the next decade. In 1854 it was said (see Wis. Farmer, 1854, 227) of sheep: ‘‘They have been brought into this state this season by thousands.’’ * Included as from Whitewater, however, were men living in the adjacent town of Lima, which is in Rock County. YOUNG FREMONT—FRENCH MERINO Bred and owned by Giles Kinney, Whitewater. First shorn at two years of age. Weight of fleece, well washed, 34 pounds. From State Agricultural Society Transactions, 1859 SUFFOLK SWINE. LORD WENLOCK, PRIZE WINNING NEW YORK SUFFOLK PIGS From JWisconsin Farmer, 1858 RICHARD RICHARDS THOROUGHBRED HORSE—SWIGERT After an oil painting in possession of Mrs. Laura Richards, Madison IMPROVED LIVESTOCK 125 in Fond du Lac County sheared nearly 5, Franklin less than 2, New Glarus nearly 4, Newton 3+, Norway 2.3,74 Orion 3, Pleasant Springs 3.2, Plymouth 4.7, Prairie du Chien 2+, Primrose 3+, Pulaski 3+, Sparta 4+. This comparison places in one category towns representing Walworth, Racine, Waukesha, Fond du Lac, Green, Rock, and Monroe counties, and suggests that the improvement of sheep, doubtless through the use of purebred merinos, had become very general in those communities. We know from other sources that this was true. Such general improvement had likewise taken place in some counties for which we have no representative towns in our list, for example Kenosha. He adds that one of the dry goods merchants at Rochester had pur- chased that summer 185,000 pounds of wool. It is seen that the suggested circle excludes Whitewater, and it is true that that town was not especially well adapted to sheep, most of the land save in the northwest and the south- east being too low. Her leadership was due to the breeders, not the general farmers, and the high average of the clip both in Whitewater and in Mount Pleasant was due to the high per cent of purebred merinos in the count. Unimproved sheep, such as were driven up from the south in the early days, would shear about 2 pounds of wool apiece. “S (J THE NEW NORT OS oN WOo% eb abe oni Sie SS ee IRS [SN THE OLD NoRTH P Bie one es > GS3 SOUTHERN raat Reno AQP KX KS SIR p ai CK XK OSC 08, AX A a ede Malla Ress RN KOCK SES , wes OPS See ee See eS FA, ie “s eect Sees: FIGURE 16 LUMBERING AND FARMING 139 men. Enormous areas covered with finest hardwoods waited for their lumbering exploitation upon the exhaustion of the pine forests, and for their agricultural development upon the disappearance of the supply of fertile prairie lands in states farther west. Into these states Wisconsin was pouring her surplus population in generous measure, so that by 1890 nearly a quarter of a million natives of Wisconsin were found by the census takers living outside of her borders. Minnesota, for example, had absorbed 59,000, and Iowa 42,000. South Da- kota, North Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas had taken an aggregate of 78,000, while the mountain states and the Pacific coast had made smaller drafts upon us. At that date the aggregate population of the 29 northern counties was only 361,500, and inasmuch as fully one-third of that number were foreign born it is doubtful if more than a third of the total consisted of natives of Wisconsin. This shows that the people had been spurning the lands of their own state lying in the wooded northern counties, while they con- tended eagerly with throngs of immigrants from every state in the union for a portion of those government lands which called for no grubbing, whether those lands lay 100, 500, or even 1000 miles farther from the general market. It was the age of prairie farming. The mind of the American farmer was set against the drudgery of land clearing, and he would not come back to it except under a kind of economic compul- sion. The census of 1890, which notes the passing of the frontier, established a convenient base from which to compute the pressure of that land shortage which gradually brought the vast and fertile areas of northern Wisconsin into requisi- tion for general farming. The lumbering business on a white pine basis has long since passed into the phase known as ‘‘cleaning up,’’ which means that mills have been disappearing from section after section. To a considerable extent, lumbermen of Wisconsin secured holdings in the South and in the Pacific Northwest in antici- pation of the exhaustion of the Wisconsin pine forests, and 140 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK many have dismantled their works in this state only to reéstablish them elsewhere. Others have entered the hard- wood fields or, with modified plant, have undertaken various lines of manufacturing in which timber and lumber are the standard raw materials. The business centers, some of them cities of considerable note, which were created during the lumbering régime have always struggled to maintain them- selves when lumbering declined, and one way to do this was to promote lines of manufacturing based upon lumber. Another method which was peculiarly available to most of the northern Wisconsin towns was to promote the settling up by farmers of the neighboring cut-over pine lands, the burned tracts, and the lands covered with hardwoods. In 1895 the state legislature passed an act creating a State Board of Im- migration, with a secretary whose office was at Rhinelander in Oneida County. Money was also appropriated for the publication of a handbook to be prepared under the direction of Professor William A. Henry, dean of the College of Agri- culture, State University of Wisconsin. During the summer and fall of 1895 Professors Henry, King, and Goff spent much of their time in the north making careful examinations of the several districts with reference to their soils, the kinds of crops adapted to soil and climate, the possibilities of livestock production, dairying, sheep raising, fruit growing, etc. They made a fairly complete general agricultural survey of the northern part of the state, taking as their starting point a line drawn from Green Bay to Hudson on St. Croix River. The material arranged by Professor Henry was published in 1896 in a book containing nearly 200 pages and fully illustrated with cuts made from photographs taken in the course of the survey. It was called Northern Wisconsin, A Handbook for the Home Seeker, and is without question the most valuable single source of information in regard to northern Wisconsin at that time. It was distributed by means of the State Board of Immigration and also through immigra- tion bureaus established in 39 northern counties, including all of the 29 which we have called the New North. LUMBERING AND FARMING 141 Professor Henry found agriculture well advanced at some points along his dividing line drawn from Green Bay to Hud- son. But at other points, especially in portions of Clark and Wood counties, conditions were still decidedly primitive ‘‘ow- ing to the heavy hardwood forests which once entirely covered those sections.’’ The same cause, a heavy covering of hard- woods, delayed the settlement of other great areas, as for example the huge belt of territory extending north from Portage and Waupaca counties and including large portions of Shawano, Marinette, Langlade, Forest, Oneida, and Flor- ence counties.1! There were other large tracts covered with hardwoods, but since the hardwood timber was coming into demand and mills for its manufacture were springing up in many localities, settlers on those lands frequently found ready sale for their timber at prices which often left a profit after clearing the land.?? Accordingly, Professor Henry did not hesitate to recom- mend the hardwood lands to settlers who were willing for some years to combine woods work with farming. Many of those lands, in fact, were taken up for homes by men who began as woodsmen, working for mill companies. As land- owners they continued to fell trees and get out logs for the mill, but they now sold logs rather than day’s labor, and every tree that crashed to the ground let in more sunlight to warm the soil and get it ready to produce crops. Thousands of sturdy Northmen, many Germans, and other foreigners, and some native Americans changed their condition in this way from hired laborers to independent owners of valuable farms. Large tracts of forest, both pine and hardwood, from time to time had been burned over. Such a burned area was in appearance most forbidding. It showed gaunt, ghostly look- ing dead pines still erect, giant trunks burned off at the base and in falling arrested by other dead but standing timber, "See William A. Henry, Northern Wisconsin, A Handbook for the Home Seeker (Madison, Wis., 1896), 72. 2 Hardwood timber, which could not be floated on the streams like pine, waited for its exploitation and marketing upon the construction of railroads into the hardwood areas. 142 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK half-buried logs overgrown and hidden by underbrush or by groves of saplings; in short, timber living and dead inextric- ably intermingled and nearly all worthless. Such a tract, in such condition, was costly to clear and brought little or no return for the wood taken off. Sometimes, however, a ‘‘dou- ble burn’’ occurred. That is, a burned-over forest such as we have just described would burn under a strong wind a second time. Now the dry dead timber served the purpose of helping to consume the green, stumps and all, leaving the land after the fire had passed practically clear so that much of it could be gotten ready for the plow at a nominal expense of about $1.00 per acre. Such land was the next thing to prairie. In fact, it prob- ably was prairie in the making. Those who took it for farms were hardly in worse case, as regards the labor of clearing, than the immigrants to North Dakota or western Nebraska, while on the double-burned lands of Wisconsin they were sure of firewood, sure of rainfall, sure of crops, and sure of a mar- ket for their products. This explains the popularity of such lands and the rapidity with which they settled up, once north- ern Wisconsin began to be looked upon as a farming country."* Last of the three great classes of timbered lands to be taken for farming was the cut-over pine lands, covered with pine stumps. In certain sections, it is true, pine grew on light, sandy, bowlder-strewn or gravelly soils, which were of little value for farming. But in general the soil of the pine lands was quite as good as that covered with hardwoods, the prevail- ing belief to the contrary being largely a prejudice brought by Wisconsin people from the Hast. One reason why settlers thought lightly of these cut-over lands was that the lumber companies thought too little of them to retain title after the timber was gone, allowing them to be sold by the county for taxes.!4 * The great fire of 1871 practically cleared most of Door County, together with portions of Brown and Kewaunee. Other great forest fires also have an historical relation to the settlement of large tracts. “Later, land companies began to pay up the taxes on such lands and to receive from the counties certificates of tax payments known as ‘‘tax-titles.’’ These titles they gave to homeseekers who bought of them. A PARTLY CLEARED FARM ON CUT-OVER LANDS = From Henry’s Northern Wisconsin ) gas £ r = OR at S A MARATHON COUNTY FARM—NOTE OAT FIELD From Henry’s Northern Wisconsin A HARDWOOD FOREST IN FLORENCE COUNTY From Henry’s Northern Wisconsin A NEW HOME IN THE NORTH From Henry’s Northern Wisconsin LUMBERING AND FARMING 143 Pine stumps will last nearly a hundred years, whereas the usual hardwoods rot out entirely within less than one-fifth of that time. There was no encouragement to take cut-over pine lands and wait for the stumps to rot away. However, it was found that after a few years their earth gripping rootlets de- eayed, making it much easier to lift or blow the stumps out of the ground. Stump pullers operating on the lifting plan have been used with considerable success. However, experiments by the College of Agriculture and by individuals have finally demonstrated the economy of using dynamite for clearing such land, and they have also shown what grade of explosive should be used for best results. The expense depends on the size and number of stumps per acre, also on the length of time during which their rootlets have been decaying. There is stump land which would cost $100 per acre to clear, though much of it would cost less than half that amount. Of course, at the higher figure men can afford to stump only the best of the pine lands. The soils of northern Wisconsin were grouped by Professor Henry under seven classes—sandy soil, sandy loam, prairie loam, clayey loam, loamy clay, heavy red clay, and swamp or humus soil. The greatest body of sandy soil is found in Mon- roe, Jackson, Adams, Juneau, Wood, and Portage counties— the great triangle in the Driftless Area covered with weath- ered sandstone soil unmixed with glacial material.° The lightest of these sandy soils requires irrigation for successful cropping. But not all sandy soils are equally light. Loamy sand is usually excellent, easy to clear, easy to work, warm, and responsive. With careful farming, to restore fertility as fast as crops consume it, such lands make excellent farms for certain crops, for sheep and other stock, though they are not of first quality for dairying because they produce grass too gingerly. The sandy loam type he found much more widely distributed over the north than the sandy soil. It covers most of the * Bee p. 8. 144 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK glaciated portions of the state which are underlain by the upper Cambrian sandstone, the soil being a mixture of the materials brought from the north and spread over the surface by the glacier and the weathered sand from the Cambrian foundation. The greater part of Waupaca, Waushara, Mar- quette, portions of Monroe, Jackson, La Crosse, Trempealeau, most of Eau Claire and Dunn, and part of Chippewa County are covered with the sandy loam soil. Buffalo, Pierce, Pepin, St. Croix, and Polk have mostly clayey loam. Outagamie has heavy red clay and clayey loam. In the great area of the crystalline rock formation’® the soil is mostly a clayey loam except in the valley and about the headwaters of Wisconsin River, where are sandy soils, sandy loams, with swamp or humus about the hundreds of lakes and marshes. Light soils also cover a strip from Menominee River to Green Bay, while Brown, Kewaunee, and Door coun- ties have mostly red clay, clayey loam, and loamy clay. ‘The Lake Superior slope also has the heavy red clay—a strong, enduring soil, somewhat stiff to work but which was found to be greatly benefited by thorough underdraining. The ridges between the rivers flowing to Lake Superior and those flowing south contain a good deal of light, sandy, and stony soil not very valuable for farming. The working of the iron and copper deposits in that region is one of the causes, in addition to lumbering, that has built up Lake Superior cities, which in their turn have stimulated the development of farming to supply the market for all manner of farm products. When Henry’s survey took place, in 1895, only the begin- nings of agriculture had been made along Lake Superior. The quarter-century which has passed since then has witnessed a great transformation, as the census of 1920 showed. The county of Douglas was credited with almost 50,000 population. Of these the city of Superior had 39,671, leaving slightly more than 10,000 to be distributed over the rest of the county, mostly on farms though there are several villages aggregating See map, p. 4. LUMBERING AND FARMING 145 upwards of 1000. Bayfield County had an aggregate popula- tion of 17,201, about 5300 of whom lived in villages, the bal- ance on farms; while Ashland County, with an aggregate of 24,538, had approximately 8000 living on farms, and Iron County had 5000. Regarding the 29 counties of the New North as a single region, we find that the population in 1920 aggregated 702,974, a gain in thirty years of 341,368. OZ6T ‘NOILVINdOg NOIGIOJ—HLYON MAN FHL LUMBERING AND FARMING 147 than has Dane County, yet such is the testimony of the cen- sus, which also shows that Marathon has the largest rural population of all the 71 counties in Wisconsin, 46,598, Dane standing second with 45,953. There are in the northern group 3 other counties with 30,000 or more rural inhabitants— namely, Barron, Clark, and Shawano; while 7 others— Chippewa, Dunn, Marinette, Oconto, Polk, Portage, and Wood—have 20,000 or over. Only 5 of the 29 counties— Florence, Iron, Oneida, Sawyer, and Vilas—have less han 10,000 rural inhabitants. The record of agricultural progress in the several disteists and counties of northern Wisconsin cannot be treated in de: tail. The Transactions of the Northern Wisconsin Agricul- tural Society, 1872 to 1887, throw a good deal of light on what the people were doing to promote better farming, particu- larly in the border counties between the north and the south. The headquarters of that society were at Oshkosh, and the annual fair was held at that place.’ Membership was not confined to the northern counties, and those north of Dane, Jefferson, and Milwaukee participated largely. In one aspect the section we have called the New North presents today many of the contrasts which were to be ob- served in the older Wisconsin of the south and southeast in 1850. In the region are some of the finest farms in the state, with modern buildings, the best improved or purebred stock, and well tilled fields growing splendid crops of hay, grain, and silage corn. On such farms the old log house of pioneer days is often standing alongside of the new dwelling supplied with every convenience, including running water, plumbing, bath- room, and lighting. On the other hand, this is the region where the mud-daubed log house and the temporary board shack are still in use as homes of families. Northern Wis- consin is still a land of promise to the pioneer, and new homes are rising daily in the hardwoods and among the decaying pine stumps. It is a land of rural contrasts in other respects as well as in the homes and the farms. There are districts having 148 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK the one-room log schoolhouses characteristic of the primitive days all over the older West. Yet, no section of the state has made greater progress in establishing the consolidated type of rural school, with thoroughly equipped school building, graded course of study, library, and high school facilities, which with well trained teachers is the true solution of the educational problems of rural communities. Northern Wisconsin is a land abounding in wild game and in streams and lakes teeming with fish. These allurements, coupled with its remaining forests, its diversified scenery, and temperate summer climate, have made it one of the summer playgrounds for tourists from southern Wisconsin and most of the Mississippi Valley states. Good roads and the automo- bile have played a decisive part in developing the tourist trade, which is a unique feature of life in the region. It is comparable to nothing in the experiences of the older Wiscon- sin communities, and its social as well as economic influence will be watched with deep interest. CHAPTER Ix THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION A reported incident, for the substantial correctness of which I can vouch personally, throws much light on the con- dition of Wisconsin dairying during the period prior to the adoption of the factory system. Sometime in the seventies the storekeeper of a Grant County village received a visit from a traveling butter buyer who examined the accumulated supply of summer butter kept in the cellar under the store. He pierced with the trier firkins, jars, rolls, and ‘‘pats’’ of the golden hued if not gilt edged product, sniffing and tasting as he passed from one lot to the next. Finally, after the exam- ination was completed, he said to the merchant: ‘‘Well! All I can offer is six and a fourth; now you may take it or leave at" ‘‘No!’’ shot back the other. ‘‘You give me six and a half and take it or leave it.’’ The buyer, slowly, ‘‘Well—I’ll take it.’’ Thus passed, perhaps to the last middleman before it reached the ultimate consumer, the summer’s dairy product of a considerable farming neighborhood. The butter had been bought at from 5 to 10 cents and the sale price of the job lot would not have covered the original cost to the store- keeper, who relied for compensation on the profits of the goods sold in exchange for the butter. The chief obstacle to success in dairying under the old régime, particularly throughout the interior of the state, was the marketing problem. The sole dealer to whom the average farmer, or farmer’s wife, resorted was the keeper of the village store, who commonly took butter, as he took eggs, salt pork, lard, and smoked meats, in exchange for groceries and other goods. In most cases buying butter was merely an accommodation to his patrons, and it goes without saying he 150 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK was not in position to grade the product strictly or to pay in accordance with the standard of excellence producers main- tained. Much, very much, of the butter carried to the stores in the summer season was unfit for human food, and in fact was ultimately sold for grease at a few cents per pound. The good butter, properly packed in clean wooden firkins or in stone jars, could be disposed of at a higher figure. The mer- chant hoped to recoup himself from the sale of the better product for the losses he inevitably sustained on the worse; but like the instance recited above, he probably in most cases lost money on the aggregate, or would have done so but for the margin of profit taken on exchange goods. Under that system of marketing, farmers had no encour- agement to prepare for dairying by providing a proper dairy house, with desirable equipment for making the best quality butter ; little thought was given to the herd, its breeding, hous- ing, winter feeding, pasturing, and general management. In a word, dairying of the kind which depended on the country store for its market lacked every element of sound business and was merely incidental to providing milk and butter for the farm home. Such dairying had been carried on from the beginnings of agriculture in Wisconsin. Whenever a farmer resolved to make dairying an important feature of his operations, the first step was to find a more satisfactory market than the store. There were several ways of doing this. One was to establish a reputation for fine butter and then sell, at a con- tract price, directly to private families. The village doctor, lawyer, teacher, and banker—frequently others also—were glad to pay more than the store price in order to make sure of nice, savory butter for their tables. It was no uncommon thing for such patrons to pay 25 or 30 cents per pound cash the year around, for butter which would have brought at the store 10 cents in summer and 20 cents in winter. Under the stimulus of such a market, although it was sharply restricted, farmers here and there began to improve both their dairying practises and their herds. LO6L 0} [SST Worg oINy[NITASW FO aso][OH oy} FO pvoyT AUNHH NOUV WVITTIM GavOH YHLSd NAG WVITTIM A FARM “SPRING HOUSE” From Eggleston’s A Circuit Rider A PIONEER HOUSEHOLD CHEESE PRESS USED IN RICHLAND COUNTY Original in State Historical Museum THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 151 Another method was to sell no summer butter in summer, but to pack it carefully and keep it under such conditions as to make it marketable in fall, at a fair price, for shipment to city commission houses. To do that required either an ex- ceptionally cool, well ventilated, and clean cellar, or else a ‘‘spring house,’’ the latter being preferable. The abundance of beautiful springs of pure cold water in many sections of the state made the stone or wooden spring house, with its deep troughs of flowing water, a not infrequent attribute of Wis- consin farms, though naturally only a small percentage of the whole were thus equipped. Farmers living in the vicinity of the large cities had special inducements to make their dairying count in the annual bal- ance. For they were able to sell their butter either directly to consumers at a fair contract price, or to middlemen who distributed directly to consumers and could afford to pay well for a first-elass article. It is not surprising that the farmers of Kenosha County, almost equidistant from Chicago and Mil- waukee, should have been among the leading pioneers in im- proved dairying, as we find them to have been. For example, W. C. White of the town of Spring Prairie began butter dairying on a considerable scale as early as 1857, changing over to cheese a few years later.1 Others in the same county were almost equally prominent. The 1860 census presents the names of three Kenosha County farmers who, in the preceding year, made over 2000 pounds of butter apiece. They were W. C. White, Pleasant Prairie, 2800 pounds; Philip Gascoyne of Somers, 3000; and Nicholas Kichtneys (probably Kicht- myer), 2100. The aggregate production of several Kenosha towns was very large, Brighton having 37,708 pounds, Bristol 47,610, Paris 56,256, Pleasant Prairie 68,567, Somers 66,627, 2Mr. White began making cheese in 1860. See Wisconsin Dairymen’s Associa- tion, Report, 1879, 124. Mr. White, it is said, was responsible for the dairyman’s slogan, used so effectively at farmers’ institutes thirty years later: ‘‘Speak to a cow as you’d speak to a lady.’’ The writer saw that admirable sentiment painted on a streamer which draped one side of the hall in which the Boscobel farmers’ institute was held February, 1887. The opposite wall was decorated with a streamer of equal length bearing this significant comment on the above: ‘‘But don’t speak to a lady as some men speak to a cow.’’ 152 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Salem 47,680, Wheatland 32,188, and Randall 19,183. The heaviest production was in the two lake front towns of Pleas- ant Prairie and Somers; the lightest in the two westernmost towns, Wheatland and Randall. The aggregate butter pro- duction for the 8 towns was 376,620 pounds. Fifteen other Wisconsin counties produced more than that amount of butter. But if the population is taken into account, Kenosha was the largest per capita producer of butter, with one exception, of the 16 counties producing more than 300,000 pounds. The ex- ception was Green County, which produced 34+ pounds per capita as against 27+ pounds for Kenosha. If, however, we limit the competition to rural population strictly, Kenosha’s per capita production is a fraction of a pound higher than Green’s.2. Contrary to current belief, Kenosha also produced more cheese than did Green County, or any other county.’ But the most significant fact revealed by the census is that a few farmers were really making a business of dairying. The counties in which by 1860 dairying was beginning to be carried on intensively were, in addition to the two named above, Racine County, which made approximately 35 pounds per capita of the rural population, and Milwaukee and Wal- worth, where the per capita production of butter was almost exactly 25 pounds. Each of these counties made a small amount of cheese, Walworth’s quota being the largest of the three. Intensity of production, however, may mean merely what, for example, it meant in the case of Milwaukee County and less pronouncedly in Green County, namely, that practically all farmers kept a few cows and made butter or cheese, of course wholly under the household system of manufacture. In view of the development which became so marked a few years later, it is interesting to scan the census of 1860 for evi- dence of a tendency to make dairying an exclusive or principal 2 Kenosha, with a rural population of 9527, produced 378,966, making the average 3824 nearly; Green County’s rural population was 17,660, her aggregate 673,966, or an average of 381%. * George DeLong of the town of Somers made 1000 pounds of butter and 6000 pounds of cheese. He had 29 milch cows, while White had 23 and Gascoyne 16. THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 153 business, of proportions which would call for special methods prophetic of the factory system. We have already noted something of the kind among the butter makers of Kenosha County. Examples have also been found in other counties. In Walworth John W. Newton of the town of Geneva kept 32 cows, making 400 pounds of butter and 10,300 pounds of cheese. P. A. Price of Rock County, near Janesville, made from 50 cows 600 pounds of butter and 25,000 pounds of cheese. Milton Barber of Waukesha, from 66 cows, made 10,000 pounds of butter and 10,000 pounds of cheese. J. V. Robbins of Burke, Dane County, had 115 cows and made 4000 pounds of butter and 6000 pounds of cheese. There were in Jefferson County three herds of 21, 30, and 32 cows producing respectively 6000, 3000, and 7000 pounds of cheese, besides 500, 1000, and 800 pounds butter. One of these belonged to Asa Favill.t | Fond du Lace also had three distin- guished herds of 25, 31, and 37 cows credited with both butter and cheese. In Green County, George Legler of New Glarus kept 29 cows, making 1000 pounds of butter and 3000 of cheese; there was a larger herd in the town of York, 36 cows, credited with 1800 pounds of butter and 6500 pounds of cheese. Sauk County had one large herd, 41 cows, but the product divided between butter and cheese was very light. From the above survey it will be seen that dairying by 1860 was well begun within the limits of the older Wisconsin; that it tended to become a regular business among a select group of farmers who were widely scattered mainly in the south- eastern and southern counties; and that the suggestion of a factory system of production existed particularly as regards cheese making. But the rank and file of Wisconsin farmers were still carrying on in the old way, careless of the character of the cows, of the way they were kept, of the milk, cream, and butter, of the method of selling the product. ‘This Favill was an uncle of Stephen Favill of Lake Mills, one of the founders of the State Dairymen’s Association and a prominent cheese manufacturer for many years. 154 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK ' It is a far ery from that state of things to the Wisconsin dairying of thirty years later, and the story of building up the dairy interest in that interval provides the leading feature of recent agricultural history. ' The forces which operated to bring about the great and fundamental changes so easily recognizable were mainly four: the influence of the New York example; the leadership of New York men; the scientizing and organizing agency of the Col- lege of Agriculture; and the whole-hearted co6dperation in the practical execution of plans and policies of Swiss, German, Scandinavian, and other farmers of foreign extraction to whom, more than to the native American element, the leaders learned to look for the daily exemplification of good methods and the elimination of bad practises. A speaker at the convention of the State Dairymen’s As- sociation in 1875 said: ‘‘Thirty-five years ago the bulk of the dairy product of America was made in central New York.’’® That statement involves a certain exaggeration, inasmuch as New England, other middle states, and especially Ohio were producing much butter and some cheese. Yet, there can be no doubt that it was New York’s surplus production upon which, about 1840, the country began to rely for its supply of butter and cheese. Indeed, the demand could not be wholly met from that source, and English cheese continued to be imported to Some extent until with the inordinate growth of the New York cheese crop after the introduction of the factory system in 1851 and the contemporary drop in production abroad, due to the cattle plague, the foreign market was opened to Ameri- can cheese. The New Yorkers who came to Wisconsin in such large numbers from 1837 to 1850 knew something about the beginnings of a more scientific—at least a more business-like —system of dairying; while others, like the late ex-Governor Hoard, who came in the fifties, had had personal contact with a movement for improved agriculture under the dairying im- pulse which was similar in many respects to what we have *C. H. Wilder, Wisconsin Dairymen’s Association, Report, 1875, 30. THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 155 seen in this state under such leadership as that of Mr. Hoard. The reports of the New York Board of Agriculture, the col- umns of the agricultural press, especially the Rural New Yorker, the lectures of scientific agriculturists, all described with enthusiasm the doings of dairymen in Herkimer, Oneida, Cayuga, Ontario, and other central New York counties. Their herds, chiefly Durhams and Devons, were held up as examples of good breeding, their barns and dairy houses were pictured for the instruction of farmers elsewhere, their methods of manufacture carefully set forth. Except to those who are unaware that people from the Em- pire State were so dominant in Wisconsin, there is no mystery in the fact that it was most frequently New York men who headed local movements for the building of cheese factories, for organizing breeders’ associations and other means calcu- lated to develop the dairying interests. A study of the begin- nings of a new type of butter and cheese business in the sev- eral counties shows the New Yorkers to have been even more exclusively responsible for the results than Vermonters were for the spread of merino sheep or Morgan horses. In Ke- nosha W. C. White, in Sheboygan Hiram Smith, in Jefferson Stephen Favill, in Fond du Lac Chester Hazen, in Walworth R. McCutcheon, in Rock C. H. Wilder, in Dane E. P. Sherman, in Waukesha B. M. Hinckley, in Richland John A. Carswell— these are some of the local leaders, and nearly all of them were immigrants to Wisconsin from central New York.® A good specimen of the outworking of the New York influ- ence, through example, is found in the way factory cheese making spread from Bear valley in Richland County to other parts of that county and to Grant County. A group of central New Yorkers was settled in Bear valley in the fifties. Among them were the Carswell brothers, the Beckwith brothers, H. L. Eaton, and others. Another New Yorker, L. G. Thomas of Herkimer County, started what is supposed to have been the first cheese factory in southwestern Wisconsin, near Lone *Hiram Smith was a Pennsylvanian. 156 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Rock in 1865.7 Two years later the Carswell factory was begun, the next year the Beckwith factory, the next the Eaton factory, till Bear valley, which once grew wheat and hops, was densely populated with cows. Its farmers were prosper- ing as dairymen, while all around in the neighboring valleys of Richland, Grant, Sauk, and Iowa counties were mortgaged farms whose owners were dubiously contemplating emigra- tion to the West as perhaps the only means of relief. North- ern Grant County had no factory prior to the organization in 1881 (possibly it was in 1880) of the Oak Grove factory in Blue River valley. That factory was started by H. Z. Fish of Herkimer County, son of a noted New York dairyman, with another Herkimer man as maker. It could not have been started, however, but for the Bear valley experience, which was brought to the farmers of the Blue River and Fennimore valleys by one of their own number whose brother was a prominent dairyman of Bear valley. That was the influence which induced farmers to subscribe cows enough to make the factory at Oak Grove pay. And the same influence enabled Mr. Fish to start several other factories in addition to that one. Ina few years the whole region was supplied with cheese factories, whose combined product was sold by a codperative board of trade located at Muscoda. When W. D. Hoard in 1870 began publishing the Jeffer- son County Union at Lake Mills, there were possibly not more than 45 or 50 cheese factories in Wisconsin.? Having come in ™See William D. Hoard, ‘‘ History of the Dairy Interest in Wisconsin,’’ Wis- consin Dairymen’s Association, Report, 1879, 126. ® The local farmer was James A. Black. He was of Virginia stock and a nat- ural leader of men. But the story he told the neighbors, as he drove around the valley with Mr. Fish, was how successfully the factory cheese making system had worked out ‘‘over on Bear Creek’’ as testified by his brother J. Q. A. Black and as he had personally observed conditions there. ®In the Transactions for 1870, published in 1871, Dr. J. W. Hoyt, secretary of the Wisconsin State Agricultural Society, caused to be printed tables exhibiting the manufactories of all the counties of Wisconsin. In these are included cheese factories, but unfortunately the number of factories is not stated save sometimes when there is but one. We are given the capital invested, pounds of cheese made during the year, and the value of the products. We find, from that source, that one or more factories existed (presumably in 1870, though one cannot be certain that new creations of 1871 were rigorously excluded) in Dane, Dodge, Fond du THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 157 1857 from Madison County, New York, and being in close touch with New York conditions, he was interested in promot- ing dairying in Jefferson County in accordance with Madison County examples. From news items about dairying progress he passed to editorial comment, and very soon his dairy column contained the most analytical, trenchant, and enlight- ening discussion of dairy problems. Since the ideas Mr. Hoard advocated were ultimately promulgated by others also and became dominant in the state, the most effectual method of revealing the features of Wisconsin’s dairying development is to give some account of those ideas as Hoard presented them, first in the Jefferson County Union, then in Hoard’s Dairyman, and meantime at hundreds of farmers’ institutes, dairymen’s conventions, and other gatherings of farmers. Hoard saw that the fundamental problem confronting Wis- consin farmers was the problem of marketing dairy products, especially cheese. Western markets, by 1872, were becoming glutted and it was necessary for Wisconsin manufacturers to break through into the eastern and English markets. This feat, no light one in the days when Wisconsin dairymen were without influence and New York’s competition was so over- shadowing, was accomplished through the agency of the Wis- consin Dairymen’s Association, organized in February, 1872, primarily for that purpose.?® Lac, Green Lake, Jefferson, Kenosha, La Crosse, Lafayette, Monroe, Outagamie, Richland, Rock, Sauk, Sheboygan, and Walworth—16 counties. The largest in- vestment in that line of manufacture was in Fond du Lae County, $26,300, where the product amounted to 441,842 pounds valued at $62,819. It seems probable that these figures represent some half dozen factories at least. Other counties which appear to have had several factories each are Green ($11,000 invested), Green Lake ($12,200), Jefferson ($18,000), Kenosha (‘‘ cheese factory’ ’—$7820), Rock ($15,500), Sheboygan ($12,500), and Walworth ($14,500). From this show- ing, the estimate of 50 factories appears not excessive. It may be too low. Hoard himself in 1873 estimated the number in 1870 at more than 100. *” The first activity of the Association was to establish market days at Water- town, where Wisconsin manufacturers could meet eastern commission men and learn what the market demanded in the way of quality, uniformity, and mode of packing the product. Chester Hazen of Ladoga, Fond du Lae County, whose factory was perhaps the first one established in the state, 1864, was the first manu- facturer of Wisconsin cheese to ship his product to the English market. This he did, it is believed at Mr. Hoard’s suggestion, in 1873. 158 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Then there was the problem of proper curing vaults for summer cheese, in order to preserve the flavor, and Mr. Hoard wrote editorials, visited sub-earth vaults in other states, and finally induced the McCutcheon firm to make the Wisconsin experiment which proved successful. By that and other methods of curing, Wisconsin’s summer cheese could be put upon the market under conditions enabling it to compete with cheese produced in cooler summer climates, largely to the benefit of Wisconsin producers. Another problem was to cheapen the cost of winter feed for cows. Mr. Hoard con- tended during many years that Wisconsin was in a position not only to produce butter and cheese of equal quality with that of New York, but to produce it at a lower cost because land was cheaper, cows were cheaper, and feed was cheaper. But he was never disposed to let well alone, and when he saw in the silo, a French invention, the means of reducing the feed cost he was quite as prompt to seize upon it as were the dairy- men in New York. The result is physically apparent to any- one who crosses the state, by rail or vehicle, in any direction, in the uniformity with which farms are equipped with one or more, usually two, silos. Perhaps the greatest stroke of policy in which Mr. Hoard led was the policy of ‘‘breeding sharply for milk’’ and paying less attention to the beef end of cattle raising. He insisted, with sound logic, many variations of statement, and convinc- ing illustrative stories, that those types of cattle which had been bred longest and most consistently for milk, butter, and cheese were the breeds for dairy farmers to specialize in. Wisconsin farmers had so long regarded the Durham and Devon, especially the former, as the breeds through which to improve their herds, that the prejudice in their favor was hard to uproot. By untiring though by no means wearisome preaching even that feat was accomplished. The ‘‘dual pur- pose cow’’ was given no chance to fasten herself upon Wiscon- sin farmers, as she has been foisted by bad leadership upon THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 159 the dairymen of some other states. That fact goes far to explain Wisconsin’s preéminence in the dairy industry.! If it is difficult to overrate the significance of leadership like that of Mr. Hoard, it becomes impossible to fix standards for determining the value to Wisconsin’s dairy interest of the work done during many years, under distinguished leaders, at the College of Agriculture connected with the University of Wisconsin. That college, the fruit of the Morrill Law of 1862, was not without a struggle established as part of the University. The issue was finally decided in February, 1866, by a farmers’ convention called by Dr. J. W. Hoyt, who was editor of the Wisconsin Farmer and secretary of the Wiscon- sin State Agricultural Society. The legislature, which was in session at the time and was partly pledged to establish the college elsewhere, practically accepted the convention’s draft (which was Dr. Hoyt’s draft) of a new fundamental law for the University, with the Agricultural College as an integral part of the institution.17 The result was hailed as a great triumph for scientific agriculture in Wisconsin. However, when it became apparent that the college educated practically no farmers, the attendance of students for some years being negligible, doubts arose in the minds of the farmers them- selves, who feared the connection with the University was blighting the prospects of the college. They then initiated a movement to separate the college from the University, and to reéstablish it elsewhere than at Madison. That movement seemed not unlikely to succeed, but in the nick of time Profes- sor William A. Henry, who had been on the ground a few years and was already a prime favorite with the farmers, started in January, 1886, the unique agricultural short course, the instant success of which forestalled further efforts to re- Mr. Hoard used to tell a charming story about a swift Morgan cavalry horse that enabled him to distance a detail of rebel troopers who would have captured him save for the animal’s fleetness. Then he would ask, ‘‘ What would have become of Hoard if that horse had been cross-bred with a percheron?’’ Moral: Breed for a purpose. % The senate voted to place the college at Ripon, or at least to give the agri- cultural college land grant to Ripon College. The house voted for the University, and in conference the senate receded. 160 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK move the college. Henry’s next great step was the inaugura- tion of the winter Dairy School for the training of butter makers and cheese makers. That school, also the first of its kind in America, was opened in the winter of 1887. Within a few years trained young men, properly certificated, were turned out in sufficient numbers to man the new factories, and it then became unnecessary longer to depend on Herkimer County and other New York cheese makers or on their ap- prentices trained in Wisconsin factories. The Dairy School, through the young men it graduated, made its anticipated contribution toward putting the dairy industry upon a scientific basis. But it did something more. Its teachers and research scientists themselves made contri- butions of incalculable value. Professor Stephen Moulton Babcock’s milk tester solved a fundamental problem in mar- keting milk under the factory system with justice to all pro- ducers. It put the creamery on a new basis at once and greatly aided the cheese factory also.1* Professor Henry’s Feeds and Feeding and Professor Russell’s introduction of the bacteriological tests for the purification of herds from in- fectious diseases, especially tuberculosis, and his practical method of pasteurizing milk were only second in importance to the Babcock test in their influence on scientific dairying. Through its extension division and its publication depart- ment the College of Agriculture became the greatest single agency of dairy education among the farmers, the promoter of organizations helpful to dairying as well as other branches of agriculture, and the clearing-house of experiments con- ducted on farms and in factories. Farmers’ conventions, 1 The creamery, or butter factory, was a later development than the cheese factory, and for obvious reasons. In making cheese the whole milk of many cows— several hundred at least—can be handled conveniently in two or three deep vats of large capacity. In these vats it can be heated, coagulated, and the curd pre- pared for the presses. For the purpose of butter making it is impracticable to handle whole milk beyond a certain minimum amount, too much space being re- quired to set it for raising the cream. About 1879 the Fairlamb system of setting milk in graduated cans for creaming was adopted by some dairymen and by some creameries. Under that system farmers raised the cream and sold it by the inch, it being assumed that an inch of cream as shown by the gauge on A’s can was as valuable for butter making as an inch on B’s. But that was far from being the HIRAM SMITH HALL (THE DAIRY SCHOOL), UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PROFESSOR STEPHEN MOULTON BABCOCK AND HIS MILK TESTER AYUAINVANO NISNOOSIM V LV YOOH ONTIATHORE THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 161 formerly held at the capitol under the auspices of the Agricul- tural Society, now came to be held at the University under college auspices. ‘The farmers’ institute, directed by the college, was established in 1886. From that year series of meetings were held in the several counties, which in character were mass meetings of farmers for the discussion of selected problems of agricultural improvement. Scientific men and practical farmers occupied the same platform, with the result that science was more closely controlled by experience and experience definitely guided by science. No other feature in the history of agricultural advancement, save possibly the more recent county agent system, has been so resultful in developing mutual respect and confidence between the farmer and the man of scientific learning. The above are but a few, although perhaps the chief, ways in which the College of Agriculture has functioned to the benefit of Wisconsin agriculture, particularly dairying. If it were possible to imagine its influence withdrawn, especially in the period beginning with the early eighties, our picture of rural Wisconsin would be sadly altered. It is a truism of military science that an army cannot be considered complete or fully effective unless the morale of its fighting forces is maintained constantly on a high plane. In Wisconsin, as elsewhere, the execution of dairying plans, pol- icies, and scientific directions was in the hands of the milkers, feeders, and breeders of cows—the everyday, plain, hard working, often tired and discouraged farmers. It is one thing to test out a theory at the experiment station barn or labora- tory, quite another to get it applied in farm practise. Some fact. The milk tester was the only solution for the problem of how to do justice to producers of cream from the standpoint of its butter content. The question of the uniformity of quality in cream was profoundly affected by the introduction of the centrifugal mechanical cream separator. But separated cream still varies a good deal, depending on how it is managed. In the earlier cheese factories all milk was paid for at a given rate per pound or hundredweight. Since some milk had in it two per cent of butter fat and some six per cent, it follows that those contributing the richer milk were discriminated against. By the butter fat test that difficulty is removed and it is now often contended that the milk which is poorer in fat is discriminated against, considering its relative value for cheese. 162 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK farmers are unresponsive, some are unintelligent, and a larger number are wanting in the moral purpose to persevere in doing a new thing under instructions, in the hope of a future contingent reward, which after all is the main condition of success. Native Americans, while keen, intelligent, and eager for the profits of every new adventure in agriculture, were by no means all willing to pay the price of success in dairying, which involved steady application to the business every day, week, and month in the year, which interdicted summer vacations, day and night fishing excursions, often even (before the arrival of the auto) daytime visits to not distant friends. Many of them refused to be ‘‘tied to a cow.”’ Such farmers made a principal share of the troops of emi- grants who moved during the late seventies and the eighties to new wheat areas like the Dakotas, selling their farms to newly arrived German, Scandinavian, or Bohemian immi- grants. These new people became interspersed among those of the older American tradition who were willing to change their system of agriculture. Some rented farms, others hired out to Americans, but a goodly proportion bought farms either at once or after a few years’ experience and saving. In the end they became the guarantors of prosperity in dairying.'* For, to begin with, they were accustomed to work, hard and persistently, the long year through. They craved no vacations aside from the usual holidays to which they were accustomed. To them it was no hardship to milk twice a day, feed and tend the cows, and deliver the milk at the factory. All that was ‘‘in the day’s work.’’ Secondly, in beginning farming under a wholly new environment such as this country presented, they became of necessity pupils in a school of prac- tise, glad to receive helpful suggestions from any source. They developed, as it were, a habit of experimentation which, “4 An editorial by Mr. Hoard which was reprinted by the Wis. Farmer, Nov. 14, 1874, refers to the economic advantage of dairying and makes the point that the chief objection to it—namely, that it requires attention every day in the year—is really one of the strongest arguments in its favor. It reduces the farming business to the ‘‘same law of success as any other.’’ In any actual business one must invest his entire time if he would succeed. THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION 163 in the period when dairying methods were undergoing revolu- tionary changes, was highly important. Thirdly, they were generally thrifty, intent first on paying for their farms and then on amassing a competency. These motives made them keen to take advantage of every suggestion the profitableness of which could be foreseen. They were less prompt than the Americans to enter upon ventures which seemed speculative, like paying high prices for purebred breeding stock, but when observation had proved the economy of such expenditures they gradually accepted them as a part of the better farming program. There is no disposition to minimize the part which native Americans took in carrying out the dairying program, for it goes without saying that thousands have been engaged in that work steadily and successfully. Neither is there any intention to deny to those of foreign birth a goodly share in the leader- ship, scientific and otherwise, which developed policies and secured their acceptance by farmers generally. The Swiss in Green County are a notable example of a group which adopted a special brand of cheese as the object of their enterprise and pursued its manufacture with extraordinary success. Many individuals among Germans, Scandinavians, and other for- eigners performed notable service in the educational phases of the movement.!® On the whole, however, and by a kind of necessity, the first generation foreigners adapted themselves to plans made by the Americans rather than attempted either to impose or to carry out plans of their own. They were good codperators and have been the basis of success in hundreds of factory associations. Their children and grandchildren, of course, are simply Americans, quite as likely to be the leaders in given communities as the descendants of the New York dairymen. The new dairying, which is the product of historical forces whose workings have been clearly discernible for fifty years, 13The late Hans Buschbauer, of Riverside Farm in Jefferson County, was a leading writer both on dairying and on other scientific phases of agriculture. His contributions appeared in the German press and the English also. 164 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK and which owes to a few leaders a debt it is impossible to assess, has placed the state in the forefront of American dairy progress. By reason of it, Wisconsin farmers are in better ease than farmers elsewhere over large areas. Even in times of severe depression the agricultural interests of Wisconsin remain strictly solvent, the cows managing always to pay their way. There are nearly 3,000,000 of these cows at the date of writing. Their product, normally, is worth $300,000,000 a year! Among them, not in the character of a bovine aristoc- racy but rather as a substantial prophecy of the barn-yard democracy of tomorrow, are 80,000 purebred Holsteins, 20,000 purebred Guernseys, 8000 purebred Jerseys, and about 3000 purebred Ayrshires. Space forbids even the attempt to sum- marize the history of the introduction and spread of the dairy breeds which, with their grades, impart to the pas- tures of Wisconsin a distinctive character. Most important of all has been the influence of dairying on the character of the farmer. Business principles, so painfully ‘lacking under the old agriculture, have come to be universally applied in marketing products, and very widely also in the more prosaic features of farm management. The new dairy- ing has made the average farmer something of a scientist, and a good deal of a business man. CHAPTER X FARM LIFE? Occupationally, farm life was more varied and colorful during the interval between universal wheat growing and uni- versal dairying than in either of those two periods. It was an age of eager, almost feverish experimentation. Most farm- ers were in debt and had to produce something which would pay interest and taxes, or else sell out and go west. Some tried to outwit the chinch bugs by sowing their wheat mixed with oats, gathering the combined crop, and then separating the two kinds of grain by means of the fanning-mill. A few tried a recommended method of horse hoeing their wheat. Many raised barley and rye as market substitutes for wheat, others raised tobacco, others hops. In the lake shore counties, particularly the northern ones, field peas became a prominent and valuable crop. In all of them the growing of hay for market was a favorite pursuit. Some, who lived near the cities, found relief from the stress caused by the succession of wheat failures in market gardening. Horticulture had been widely practised as a household art, to provide home fruits on the farm, but except in a few cases not as a major enterprise.2, Now, favored districts, especially the Door Peninsula, entered upon apple growing as a business, this to be combined in recent years with cherry growing. The north- ern frontier farmers raised hay, oats, and other supplies for the pineries. *The greater part of this chapter refers to the middle or pre-dairying period, and some of the illustrative facts are drawn from the author’s recollections of his own boyhood on a southwestern Wisconsin farm. 7A State Horticultural Society was organized about the beginning of the statehood period, under the leadership of men like Dr. Philo R. Hoy of Racine. It performed invaluable service to the state in the way of popularizing a love of fruits and flowers. It was said that the severe winter of 1856-57 almost totally destroyed the orchards grown prior to that date; but, nothing daunted, the society urged replanting and the planting of new orchards about all homes which were unsupplied. 166 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK The majority of the farmers in southern Wisconsin, how- ever, turned their attention to livestock as the surest means of making a profit. There was little uniformity either in kind or in type of animals, and one might have seen a herd of grade Durham steers in one man’s pasture, a herd of common, cows in that of the neighbor adjoining, horses in a third, and sheep in a fourth—depending on which the owners thought would pay best. A fifth farm might show few cattle, horses, or sheep, but its yards and clover fields would be overrun with hogs and pigs of all sizes and conditions. Perhaps the closest parallel to or nearest successor of the former extensive wheat grower as a man of business was the farmer who fattened cattle on a considerable scale. Such men were to be found in all the corn growing counties. They raised big fields of corn in place of the former fields of wheat, bought up stock cattle through the countryside from farmers having a few head each, fed out their corn and, when the cattle were fat, either shipped to Chicago themselves or sold to big dealers. The business called for a good deal of capital, which only a few could command, good judgment in selecting animals, and shrewd bargaining both in buying and in selling. Some farmers succeeded where others failed, and the successful cattle feeders rose to be almost a distinct class. They had business and social relations with other cattle men, as well as with the numerous farmers from whom they bought, with bankers, and with city commission merchants. In addi- tion, some of them were money lenders and held the mortgages on much farm property in their neighborhoods. This gave them power but not unmixed popularity. Thus the cattle feeding farmer enjoyed some of the opportunities and advan- tages which came to the western ranchman. But, unlike the ranchman, who was free, venturesome, untired, he often took his full share of the hard, plodding labor of field and barn- yard, remaining what the other would be apt to call ‘‘a hay- seed farmer.’’? * Cattle feeding as an alternative to dairying is still a business of considerable importance in certain sections of the state, notably the southwestern counties. FARM LIFE 167 Corresponding to the variety of farm activities was a ka- leidoscopic diversity in farms and farm buildings. Fields were still enclosed, for the most part, fences being of boards, or boards and wire, of barbed-wire alone, of poles, and of the old ‘‘ worm fence’’ type, which, however, was disappearing in the older districts. Buildings for housing the livestock were of every description, from the permanent hillside barn, well protected above the stone work by means of a coat of red paint, or the all frame type, built wholly above ground, with hayloft on the second floor, to the pioneer’s frame of poles covered with straw. Cows were not generally stabled for milking but were milked in the ‘‘cow yard.’* Next to the diversity due to different types of farming was the pictur- esqueness imported into the rural neighborhoods through the mingling together of several distinct racial stocks. Although the southeastern counties were originally occupied almost ex- elusively by people from the Northeast and from Ohio, it was not long before many foreigners, especially Scandinavi- ans, Germans, Irish, and Welsh, were distributed among them. The Town Studies of the Wisconsin Domesday Book illustrate the point, showing how Mount Pleasant, for example, came to have one-third of its people of foreign birth, Whitewater one- fourth, and so on. Proportions like these left the general character of the community American, but the infusion of for- eign blood showed in several ways. While many immigrants came with money and bought good farms at once, some at first . were poor. Such people lived in the log houses abandoned by the older farmers, or built new log or cheap frame houses on small tracts purchased to make the beginnings of their farms. Some of their children might be ‘‘hired out’’ to near- by farmers, the boys as field help, the girls as housemaids. Meantime, their farms were started, and with hard work and thrift they were often enlarged until the labor of all the fam- ily was required properly to work them. *Hamlin Garland’s memory of the cow yard, as presented both in his short stories and in A Son of the Middle Border, is perhaps typical of the sense of loathing generated in sensitive minds by that institution. 168 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Every foreign element had its own peculiar customs both inside the home and outside. In cookery they introduced new dishes, in gardening new plants and new varieties of flowers. Germans, Scandinavians, Bohemians, and others were wedded to gardening as a feature of home making. Some Americans also were excellent gardeners, but many of them were content to raise a few things only, like early potatoes, some cabbages and melons. With the foreigners gardening was a household art. The women and younger children performed the labor, and the garden—a small plot of ground next the house, highly fertilized, cultivated intensively, fenced against poultry by means of either pickets or woven willows—was apt to be a charming little world with its plats separated by lily bordered paths growing scores of different esculents, its currant and gooseberry bushes lining the fence, and its clusters of decora- tive flowers, shrubs, and vines. Perhaps there was also a ‘‘symmer house’? of lattice work covered with morning-glory. Though the houses of immigrants might be inferior to those of their American neighbors, their gardens, which guests were always glad to visit, compensated them in large measure. On their first little farms the foreigners frequently used oxen when horses were the rule among all other farmers. This made an interesting variation, both in the fields and on the highways. The foreign costumes, mode of speech, and social practises all differed at first from the American, but tended rapidly to grow less distinctive. The children in the schools were the quickest to assimilate American speech and customs, the women in the homes the last. But where immigrants of the same race lived in colonies, as in the northern lake shore counties and a few other sections, these changes proceeded much more slowly. There many old-world customs descended even to the grandchildren. A significant fact in connection with earlier foreign immi- grants to Wisconsin was the almost universal training of the adult in some line of useful endeavor. Among those who had not been farmers at home nearly all had some trade or eraft, learned by apprenticeship. There were carpenters, A WALWORTH COUNTY FAMILY Grandparents emigrated from New England, children and grand- children born in Wisconsin Residence of Henry Natesta. RESIDENCE OF HENRY NATESTA, BERGEN, ROCK PRAIRIE Modern phase of a Norwegian farm home THE DISAPPEARING RAIL OR VIRGINIA “WORM” FENCE SAUSAGE GRINDER MADE BY A GERMAN IMMIGRANT Original in the State Historical Museum FARM LIFE 169 cabinet makers, turners, plasterers, masons, painters, weav- ers, spinners, metal workers, book binders, musicians, mill- wrights, and wheel-wrights. Occasionally, to the amusement of acclimatized immigrants, someone would appear who was equipped with a trade which, though very usable in the old country, had no market value here—for example, a tiler, or roof slater. Often enough these callings had little relation to the business of farming, yet nearly always the special skill showed somewhere in the arrangements of farm or home, and often it became invaluable to the neighborhood. If nothing more, the presence of men possessing such special gifts pro- duced a healthful wonderment in the young. The foreign craftsmen who actually functioned—for example, wood work- ers and iron workers—were better trained than the Americans in the same lines, just as foreign trained farmers were closer; more careful cultivators. Consequently, their skill fixed the standards for the communities. Many a fine, though unpre. tentious, farmhouse enjoys distinction today as a relic of the pioneer period because some clever foreign trained carpenter, brick layer, or mason was given a free hand in its construc; tion and played architect as well as builder. Hundreds of pieces of farmhouse furniture and bric-a-brac owe their exist- ence to the same source of artistic skill and good workman: ship. Since everyone who had the opportunity to do so, nat- urally tried to reproduce the types of buildings and furniture with which he was familiar in the old country, some degree of variety was introduced by them into the environments of Wisconsin farm neighborhoods. If we were to extend this discussion to conduct and intellec- tual influences, one might say that the elaborate, formal cour- tesy displayed by well-bred foreign immigrants often left its impress upon sensitive youth, while the new horizons touched by their conversation about European politics, military ‘his- tory, and social life excited the imagination of many an _American boy and girl. Even the superstitious folk tales of ghosts and giants related to children by foreign domestics and by hired men supplied a tinge of poetic color to lives which 170 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK were all too completely immersed in existing realities. Their songs and instrumental music, so different from the prevail- ing church music and the sentimental love songs of the Amer- icans, made another favorable contrast. On the other hand, the tendency among many foreigners to make excessive beer drinking a feature of their amusements created a very unfa- vorable impression upon the more rigid church-going tem- perance people, and reinforced their determination to do away with the liquor saloon by means of legal restrictions. There was much individuality in the way farmers, both Americans and foreigners, performed their farm work. To be sure, as in any other business, some men were industrious and clever workers, others were sluggish, careless, or lazy. But, in addition to that universal difference the good workers had methods of their own. One would depend more on hand work, like hoeing corn instead of cultivating with the use of horses, or cradling his small fields of grain instead of using the reaper. Another, more business-like, would use horse power for everything. In general, the Americans were apt to be horse farmers, the foreigners hand farmers; but there were many exceptions. Some would rise at an unconscionable hour, say half past three, and work until after dark; others followed the good old rule and labored in the field ‘‘from sun to sun.’’ If the hired men on Wisconsin farms had been di- arists, one would obtain pictures of interesting farmer person- alities as seen by their underlings. Every neighborhood had its hard drivers, who so overworked their men that it became difficult for them to secure hands. -After the introduction of factory dairying, it was almost the universal practise to begin field work late in the morning and close early in the evening, say at half past five. But in the earlier period, the occasional farmer (usually an Ameri- can) who followed that practise was looked upon by his neigh- bors as ‘‘lazy and shiftless,’’ notwithstanding the appearance ef his crops, livestock, home, and barnyard belied such a con- clusion. The greatest divergence prevailed with respect to work on Sunday. Religious people generally kept Sunday FARM LIFE 171 free from all work save the ‘‘chores.’’ Some of them, how- ever, made rather free use of the biblical permission to drag one’s ass or ox out of a pit on the Sabbath day. The trouble was that they were not at all literal in defining ox or ass, or in defining pit. The words covered any emergency job, and the habit, once formed, of doing exceptional jobs on Sunday, such jobs easily became numerous enough to occupy the farmer practically every Sunday in summer. And in those days, when the farmer worked on Sunday his men usually worked, his children worked, and of course his teams worked. The effect was a loss of morale all around. Those farmers, whether churchgoers or not—and many non-churchgoers were in that class—who rigorously kept Sunday as a day of rest for man and beast, encouraging the hired men to spend it well, in a restful way, giving the work animals a few hours of much relished freedom and smiling on the children’s play, were sup- porters of a far wholesomer type of rural life. Religiously, those communities appear to have been most prosperous whose people were mainly of the same speech and same social condition even if they varied somewhat in reli- gious beliefs. Some of the American communities worshiped very harmoniously in that Protestant church which suited the majority sect, whether Presbyterian, Methodist, or some other. And the same was true of Germans, Scandinavians, and English or Welsh. Old Lutheran and Reformed did not always have separate churches, though when each sect was numerous they commonly did. Unity in other matters made unity in religion easier to achieve. Some churches, however, which were homogeneous doctrinally were divided racially and manifested much disharmony. The organizers of churches, both Catholics and Protestants, were often men of powerful personality who were able to con- tribute largely to the building up of rural life on its spiritual and intellectual sides. Yet it is doubtful if their work as insti- tution builders was always beneficial. Overzeal in the interest of the denominations they represented induced them fre- quently to start a second organization where one already ex- 172 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK isted, or a third within a township having two others, thus weakening the support of all and making it impossible finally for the rural churches to maintain themselves against the rivalry of town and village. Many an abandoned wayside church stands as an accusing witness to such mistaken mis- sionary effort. It is also true that changes in rural life, the shifting of the population, the emigration of some of the original families, the influx of new families of a different faith, and particularly improvements in locomotion—better roads, lighter vehicles, speedier roadsters, the auto—all have helped to rob the rural communities of many once flourishing churches. The old-time camp meeting, a distinctively rural phenom- enon, entered Wisconsin soon after its settlement from the Kast. In August, 1838, there was held such a meeting in the grove along Root River near Racine, which is said to have been attended by hundreds of pioneer families from all the southeastern counties. It was the first one held in that sec- tion, if not the first in the state. The appointments were iden- tical with those described by Eggleston and other writers on religious conditions in the West. For example, the grounds at night were lighted in the regulation camp meeting fashion, by means of great fires built on elevated stages floored with poles and covered with earth.» Such meetings continued to be held periodically in some communities until less than forty years ago. They have for the most part given place to the ‘‘taber- nacle’’ revival meetings, now always centered in the towns. The intensity, or drive, which the farmer put into the work on the farm affected the children most directly. To the man who was intent merely upon getting more and more acres cul- tivated though it required night and Sunday work to do it, the time of his children was chiefly valuable for the amount of help they could give him. Their schooling was entirely sec- ondary, their recreational needs not even considered. Play was opposed to work. The boy who loved to play was apt to *See Racine Argus, Aug. 15, 1838, for a full description of the meeting. FARM LIFE 173 be stigmatized as ‘‘too lazy to work,’’ and a similar judgment often fell with crushing weight on the boy or girl who was more than ordinarily fond of books and reading. The proba- bility is that about the same proportion of farm children were sifted in those days as at present, yet statistics of high school, academy, normal school, and college prove that the number who actually secured an opportunity for full intellectual de- velopment was exceedingly small in comparison with the num- bers who have that opportunity today. The reason is to be sought partly in the earlier deficiency of schools and the obsta- cles which an inflexible course of study placed in the paths of would-be scholars. But mainly it is to be found in the fam- ily’s hardship involved in losing a boy’s time from the farm labor and in finding the means of meeting inescapable ex- penses. Very few farmers, comparatively, could afford both the loss of a boy’s time and the school expenses, so that if a boy really cared greatly to pursue learning he might reckon on a program which would entail sacrifice. For example, he would be obliged to work for his board, or else take time to earn money between the years or even the terms of schooling. Not infrequently the process was so long and so laborious that graduation found the candidate a mature man of thirty, with plenty of experience behind him to establish a firm, self- reliant character. ‘‘Getting an education,’’ as the story of John Muir proves, was an heroic enterprise which remorse- lessly tested the ambition and moral stability of boys as well as their intellectual powers.® Despite its barrenness in many respects, the neighborhood district school was far more apt to be the inspirer of boys and girls than was the home, the church, or other social in- fluence to which the young were exposed. With all its short- comings the school was the one avowed ‘‘literary institution”’ of the countryside. Many of the rural school teachers in our period were men of considerable attainments, sometimes *John Muir, The Story of My Boyhood and Youth (Boston, 1913), contains the story of a Wisconsin farm boy’s struggle to obtain an education. 174 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK boasting college degrees. Frequently they were graduates of some eastern academy or normal school. They taught rural schools in order to gain a teaching apprenticeship before tak- ing higher teaching positions, or as a stepping stone to one of the other learned professions, or to a business career. A few were farmers in the summer and teachers in the winter. Every neighborhood has its tradition of noted teachers of this type who left a lasting impression upon the community. It was these men, in large part, who were responsible for the steady trickle of students into the schools of higher learn- ing from country neighborhoods. Sometimes the direct word of advice or encouragement fired a boy’s mind; more often perhaps it was the opportunity for self-testing furnished by the class competitions, literary and declamatory contests, and debates. For the live rural teacher stirred his pupils by arousing the whole community to an interest in what the school was doing, and by making the schoolhouse a social cen- ter in addition to a focus of intellectual activity. He arranged spelling matches which drew in the best spellers from ad- joining districts to compete with his scholars, his school ex- hibitions brought in most of the people of the district, and the debates, notwithstanding the strongly theoretical subjects commonly chosen, occasionally attracted wide attention through the county.’ School entertainments by no means exhausted the social and recreational facilities of farm neighborhoods, although they constituted a very important part of them. The ‘‘singing school,’’ also conducted at the schoolhouse, was a valid excuse for the assembling of boys and girls; and when the peripatetic singing master, as sometimes happened, was both a good in- structor and a strong personality, the cultural influence of the tA Racine County school (No. 3) in 1868 debated the question ‘‘Shall the United States acquire the island of Cuba?’’ The liquor question, woman’s suf- frage, capital punishment were all favorite subjects for school literary society debates. THE MEYER FARM Home of Balthaser Henry Meyer during his student days at Oshkosh State Normal and University of Wisconsin HICKORY HILL FARM HOME OF JOHN MUIR DURING HIS STUDENT DAYS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN From his Story of My Boyhood and Youth. By courtesy of the Houghton Mifflin Company NISNOOSIM ‘XENQNO0O wW10d ‘HNOH WHVA GNV WHVA ALVG-OL-dn NV FARM LIFE 175 meetings was not inconsiderable.’ Their occasional concerts drew a more than local audience. About the year 1880 or 1881 (at least in southwestern Wis- consin) farm boys began to organize baseball clubs modeled after those already familiar in the towns. Having no Satur- day afternoon holiday, the practise meets and games were placed on Sunday afternoon. They attracted all of the young folks, a good many of the elders, and of course the farm hands. The result was wholesome in several ways. Though the games cost the players doubly sore muscles for a day or two during each week, and occasionally a broken finger, these gatherings put the cumulative force of social codperation be- hind the unuttered demand of children for a recognition of the right to play. Incidentally, they went far to abolish Sun- day work on farms and, by a natural reaction on the part of the church people, led in many places to the custom of a Saturday half-holiday. All the world knows about the country ball or ‘‘dance’’ of forty or fifty years ago, where dances were mostly quadrilles, the music ‘‘fiddling,’’ and the movements of the dancers guided less by art than by what, in terse country phrase, has been called ‘‘main strength and awkwardness.’’ This signi- fies that the dancers’ reactions to the rhythm of the music and the directions of the prompter were dictated by natural im- pulses gradually modified by experience, observation, and self-criticism; not that they were necessarily devoid of grace and harmony. Boys and girls learned to dance by dancing in public as participants in a four-couple quadrille, with no pre- liminary private lessons to familiarize them with the motions, the changes, or the etiquette to be observed toward partners and others. To many an awkward youth the ‘‘first dance’’ was his social ‘‘baptism with fire,’’ but those who possessed the right qualities were molded thereby with surprising ® The state had some noted singing masters, like Luther Lyman of Whitewater, who maintained the same itinerary year after year for perhaps fifteen years, training an entire generation. Some of the singing masters were foreigners of excellent preparation. W. D. Hoard also was a singing school master for several years. 176 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK promptness into well poised, courteous, gentlemanly fellows. From the standpoint of social training, the country dance performed a service of obvious value. Unfortunately, in many neighborhoods dancing tended to become too exclusive a form of recreation, thus depriving young people of other forms which were more educational or more healthful. Worst of all, balls of a public character were generally commercialized and they often came under the baleful influence of the saloon, of reckless drinkers, and of the rowdy element. On moral grounds some religious denominations opposed dancing, and every community was likely to have a pro-dancing party chal- lenged by a no-dancing party, which sometimes gave rise to bitter contests over questions of social policy.? Perhaps no one thing did more to impair the social unity of neighbor- hoods, and to paralyze plans for providing wholesome recrea- tion, than the eternal question of dancing or no dancing. Many farmers made ‘‘going to town’’ more or less a weekly holiday, taking Saturday for that purpose quite as regularly as the women took Monday for wash-day. The Saturday trade was a kind of ‘‘clearance sale’’ for the village store- keepers, although prices were not marked down and little cash changed hands. The farmers brought in whatever they had to sell, especially butter and eggs, whose value would be checked off against the purchases and the balance charged or —more rarely—credited. But buying and selling was only the incentive of these weekly trips, not the exclusive motive. Farmers who had the habit would make an excuse to go to town even if there was no business justification for it. They felt the need of the customary relaxation, of dressing up, of the opportunity for conversation, for learning the news of the wider neighborhood, and for ‘‘seeing what was going on.”’ Those who developed the saloon habit and wasted their time and money carousing are not considered in the above de- scription. °See the report of an excoriating sermon on dancing, in Stirling W. Brown, In the Limestone Valley (1900), 168-172. FARM LIFE 177 The village merchant is not often credited with a social function, yet his store was a genuine social center. Perhaps for the older people it was the most important single social opportunity aside from the church, and its value for that purpose varied with the character of the storekeeper. In some cases he was an original and striking personage, men of inferior personality being apt quickly to fail. Dealing with a group of families which remained relatively constant, he gradually acquired much detailed knowledge of their affairs and could instantly speak the name of practically every man and woman of the countryside. He would see to it that the persons assembled in the store became acquainted with one another. He was always able to start the conversation with a pertinent question directed to this one, a comment uttered here, a remark countered there. The store of such a man was always on Saturday a buzzing reception hall with people com- ing and going, with groups of men and women constantly joined in the most spontaneous because unconscious and inci- dental social intercourse.!° The children and young people received less benefit from the town going habit than the elders, because their trips to town were less frequent and not at all regular. They went in force only on special occasions, such as Fourth of July, circus day, and fair time."! It will be understood that the farm life above described was that of the open country, away from centers of population. Some farming communities were situated in the immediate neighborhoods of cities, towns, or prosperous villages, and their families participated in many of the social opportunities enjoyed by the urban people. They took advantage of the See Grant Showerman, A Country Chronicle (New York, 1916). He gives a marvellously lifelike picture of the evening conference at the store (in Brookfield, Waukesha County) about 1880. He depicts the types of farm work, including sugar making, and also gives dramatic descriptions of the country ball and other rural amusements. 1 But it was a kind of vacation to them to have the parents away once a week. Work was less strenuous at such times, supervision was lax, and the spirit of fun rampant. Then, too, it was exciting to speculate about what the parents would bring home on their return. 178 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK church services, the school, the library, the theatre, the recre- ational facilities, and the varied means of keeping in touch with the outside world which were denied to dwellers in the open country. Such families, so long as they prospered eco- nomically, had no serious social problems to meet. For they might live as well as the prosperous families in town and mingle socially with such families. But any falling-off in in- come meant a corresponding decline in status. Expenses being higher near the city than farther out, general farmers often failed to make ends meet. These farmers accordingly sold out to others'*—largely foreigners—who lived more simply, adopted more intensive methods, raised more produce, and made the farms pay. Herein we find part of the explanation for the prevailingly foreign cast of the suburbanite farming population. Another is the fact that so many of the later foreign immigrants came from cities, where they were habit- uated to the delights of a well developed social life which they were unwilling to exchange for the compensations afforded by a home in the open country. They understood how to get the most out of a few acres of land, were accustomed to land values much in excess of those encountered in Wisconsin; some of them came well supplied with money to buy, and others were willing to mortgage the future, for many years, in order to obtain present enjoyment of a farm close in. A glance at successive series of land ownership charts of town- ships adjacent to the lake cities will show how, little by little, English names disappeared to be replaced by those of Ger- man, Dutch, Scandinavian, Bohemian, and Polish origins. A town like Sheboygan Falls, once occupied largely by farm- ers from New York, is now held in smaller tracts and farmed more intensively by farmers who are mainly Germans. The process of rural development, coupled with the extraor- dinary growth of towns, has already brought about a vast *The writer has personal knowledge of communities in the Dakotas whose families, now owning from 160 to 640 acres of land each and ranking as promi- nent, prosperous citizens, were emigrants about 1880 from undesirable farms in the hill country of southwestern Wisconsin. FARM LIFE 179 increase in the suburbanite class of farmers. In effect also the motor car and good roads make it possible for those living not more than eight or ten miles from town or city to do their weekly shopping on Saturday night, after chores, as easily as formerly they could do it by taking the entire day. And it becomes equally practicable for them to enjoy the church, the theatre, lectures, and entertainments held in the near-by town, while they can visit more distant places with economy and ease. Thus farmers have now a vastly enlarged sphere of action, a larger circle of friends and acquaintances, and a multitude of social opportunities where formerly they had but few. All this proves beneficial to the rural family provided money is forthcoming to pay for the car and its upkeep, for the good roads, for the better attire of the young people, who now insist on city styles in all personal appointments, for a home with modern conveniences, especially flowing water, bathroom, electric light (or its equivalent), and for such household furniture, musical instruments, books, and magazines as are found in the city homes where the young folks visit and whose members they expect to entertain. In addition, the expense of educating children is greater, high school training being now a customary supplement to the graded school, and a college course, or at least special agricultural and home economics courses, being desired by a large proportion. Thus the suc- cess of farm life on the social side depends on the ability of the farmer to make the farm yield a more generous income than that to which earlier farmers were accustomed. In the new dairying, farmers have developed a methodology of success which may illustrate also what is possible in other lines. So many of the processes involved have been standard- ized that, assuming a reasonable or normal market,!? results can be predicted with a good deal of accuracy. In the old days making butter to sell was a species of gambling, if only be- cause the farmer had the vaguest ideas as to how much butter 3 This at the moment of writing does not exist, and it creates the most acute country life problem, demanding statesmanlike handling. 180 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK his cows would produce in the year, what amount and value of food they consumed, or what expenses were incurred in pro- duction. Today farmers have the means of determining food costs and labor costs, while the almost universal practise of testing butter fat production of cows gives to the herd an ascertained character and value in production. Moreover, breeding for performance has become, if not a science, at least a very widely understood and successfully practised art. Within uncertain but wide limits it is now known to be prac- ticable to increase production by careful breeding; the farmer has his choice of a large number of recorded herds from which to select breeding stock, he has at his command the scientific advice of successful breeders, of the agricultural college, and of the county agricultural agent. It has been historically demonstrated many times that a herd of cows which averages 200 pounds of butter fat can be improved by breeding and se- lection among the offspring until in a few years it is a 300- pound herd and soon thereafter a 400-pound herd. With purebreds records much higher than that have been obtained. Tt has also been shown that by using silage in summer as well as in winter, and by feeding soiling crops instead of pasturing exclusively, the unit of land per cow can be greatly reduced. Hiram Smith’s ideal, as far back at least as thirty- five years ago, was 100 cows on 100 acres. His land was among the very best Wisconsin farm land for growing forage crops, roots, etc., and he may not have attained his ideal, but he and many others have approximated that standard. Ac- cordingly, the farmer who has a small farm, say 60 or 80 or even 40 acres, can today hope to succeed as a dairyman. In the past he could not do so, and therefore, when dairying became dominant the small farmer sold out to his neighbor and left Wisconsin just as, forty years earlier, his prototype in Vermont and in New York left those states to go to Wis- consin, Iowa, and Illinois. It was the departure from south- ern Wisconsin communities of so many small farmers that explains the actual reduction of the farm population in those counties at recent census periods. Obviously, the only prac- FARM LIFE 181 ticable way to increase the rural population is to increase the number of farm families, and that, in a well settled country, means dividing the larger farms into smaller farms. The process of division has begun, and it constitutes the chief basis of hope that our rural population will be built up in numbers while retaining and improving the economic status already achieved. It is easy to estimate that 20 cows averaging 400 pounds will make more profit for their owner than 40 300- pound cows. And if the 20 cows are maintained on 40 acres while the 40 cows required 160 acres, the profits will be further augmented by the saving of three-fourths of the land, which could be supporting other families to help maintain roads, consolidated schools, churches, and rural parks—thus raising farm life to the same plane of success socially that in normal times under the most approved system of farm management it occupies economically. Tut ENp mip ay | ponte APPENDIX A CENSUS OF OLD HOMESTEADS Epitep By EpnAa LOUISE JACOBSON i | { , ae, Se f " iy | i ; iv I i Aa Tit i ' ‘ . t vy i “ « me i i] i ] ay y eta rad Wi \ i Koabadvirn is Dal await ar A CENSUS OF OLD HOMESTEADS In the December, 1920, issue of the Wisconsin History Bul- letin, the State Historical Society addressed to the public through the newspapers of the state the following invitation and directions: The State Historical Society wishes to obtain and publish a census of those farms sixty years old or more, which in this year 1920 are still in the families of the men and women who ereated them out of pieces of wild land. It matters not from whom the title originally came—whether the United States government, the state government, or a private owner. The only condition is that the land must have been improved or made into a farm by the present owner or one of his or her ancestors. Owners of such family homesteads are requested to send in the requisite information about them without delay. For convenience in filing, the follow- ing form should be used: 1. Description of land [Example: NE/4 SE/4 Sec. 7. T. No. 8 R.2W].: 2. Maker of the farm [Example: James W. Jones]. 3. Date at which ownership began [Example: 1842]. 4, Origin of title [Example: From U. S. Govt. Cert. of Purchase No. 5763; From State. Cert. of Purchase No. 7321; From John Smith. Warranty deed, 1842]. 5. Date of his settlement on the land [Example: 1843]. 6. Proof of above statement as to date of settlement [Kxample: A letter written by the settler or some member of his family; some instrument or transaction which is of record; statement by original owner later in life; testimony of aged neighbors nome the facts]. 7. Name of present owner and relationship to original she [Example: Wesley G. Jones, grandson of James W. Jones]. 8. If possible give a brief sketch of the original farmer, a photograph of: him, and any photographs of the farm, with approximate dates. : 9. Description of the present farm. 10. Date of report. Kindly send information to State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. The response was immediate and for a time encouraging. A considerable amount of data drifted in during the succeed- ing three or four months, after which there was a lull and then a complete cessation of letters about ancestral farms. In August, 1922, the invitation was repeated and a new group of entries came in for record. 186 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK In preparing this first list for publication as an appendix to the History of Agriculture in Wisconsin, Miss Jacobson has selected from the data now in hand the most typical cases, dis- tributed somewhat evenly among the counties represented. Others will appear, in groups, from time to time. The State Historical Society of Wisconsin offers the oppor- tunity to owners of such farms to make a permanent record, but it does not feel called upon to canvass the state for data. What we receive from persons interested will be recorded in due time and in such form as seems advisable. JOSEPH SCHAFER. BROWN COUNTY Cartes WiuuiamMs HomestEeap. (1) Description of the land: Lot 105 of subdivision of tract of land known as the “Williams Grant.” (2) Maker of farm: Charles Williams, native of England. (3) Origin of title: War- ranty deed, 1860. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1861. (5) Present owner: Mrs. M. A. Bidwell, daughter of Charles Williams. (6) Date of report: December 27, 1920. When Charles Williams left England in 1850, he came first to Canada, and in 1858 to Green Bay. The farm which he developed is situated on a state trunk highway about five miles from De Pere. During the first winter Mr. Williams earned a living cutting wood and hauling it with oxen over the trail which has since been converted into this modern concrete road. Mrs. M. A. BipwELL, West De Pere. CRAWFORD COUNTY MicHaEL Warp HomestEap. (1) Description of the land: S %NE% and SE 4 SE \% See. 20, SW 144 SW 1% See. 21, all in T 11 N, R 3W, Town of Clayton. (2) Maker of the farm: Michael Ward, born 1812, in County Galway, Ireland. (3) Origin of title: U. S. Govt. patents, 1854. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1858. (5) Present owner: W. M. Ward, grandson of Michael Ward. (6) Date of report: Jan. 19, 1921. Michael Ward and his family came to Wisconsin from Dixon, Illinois, making the trip in the fall of 1858 with two yoke of oxen. They made a shelter of their carts and used them for houses until spring. The land com- prising this homestead contains many fine springs. W. M. Warp, Soldiers Grove. DANE COUNTY Henry Boning Homestesap. (1) Description of the land: N % SW ¥,SE%SW 4, W%NE% SE % Sec. 2, T 5N, R 8H, Town of Mont- rose. (2) Maker of farm: Henry Boning, native of village of Golden- stead, Oldenburg, Germany. (3) Origin of title: Warranty deed from Sebastian Waffle and wife, 1855. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1855. APPENDIX 187 (5) Present owner: Henry Boning, aged 93 years. (6) Date of report: Dee. 13, 1920. On his first trip to America, in 1843, Mr. Boning settled in Cincinnati. In 1850 he joined the California gold seekers, making the trip by way of Cape Horn. On his return he visited his native land, after a few years im- migrating to Wisconsin and settling on the farm he now owns. He cleared and broke the land, erected all the farm buildings, and set out many orna- mental trees. HeEuEen Bonine, Basco. SyLvEsTER CARPENTER HomeEstEaD. (1) Description of the land: SE % SW %4, W 22 A.NW % SW %&%, and SW % SW 4, all in See. 27, District No. 7. (2) Maker of farm: Sylvester Carpenter, native of New York. (3) Origin of title: U. S. Govt. patent, 1846. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1846. (5) Present owner: Orlow Carpenter. (6) Date of report: Feb. 9, 1921. Sylvester Carpenter and his wife had for their first Wisconsin home a eomfortable house of sawed lumber hauled from Milwaukee; this house is now used as a granary. Across the land lay a well worn Indian trail from Lake Koshkonong to the Madison lakes. The farm yielded in 1848 mainly wheat, gradually changing until now it is one of the finest tobacco farms in Dane County. Mary Hart, Oconomowoc. Davip CHICHESTER HomesteaD. (1) Description of the land: E % SE 4, Sec. 22 and W side W %4 SW % See. 23, all in T 5N, R 11E, Town of Dunkirk. (2) Maker of farm: David Chichester. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from Joseph Owens, 1849. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1849. (5) Present owner: Herman Chichester, son of David Chichester. (6) Date of report: January, 1921. The first house erected on the Chichester homestead was of logs; though small, it housed fourteen men who were working on the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad, which passed close to the farm. The log house was displaced in 1856 by a frame structure. The nearest market was Milwaukee, and to this place Mr. Chichester would haul his wheat by ox team and sell it for twenty-five or thirty cents a bushel. Mrs. C. E. ANTHONY. Younes Hatuock Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: E%NEY% and NW 4 NE % See. 35, T 7N, R 8E, Town of Middleton. (2) Maker of farm: Youngs Hallock, native of town of Minisink, Orange County, New York. (3) Origin of title: U. S., Govt. patent, 1847. (4) Date of settle- ment on the land: 1851. (5) Present owner: Hulett Hallock, son of Youngs Hallock. (6) Date of report: Mar. 11, 1921. In 1847 Youngs Hallock came to Wisconsin, and made his headquarters at Janesville while he and one John V. Cairns made land-seeking trips. His selection was not entirely a matter of choice, as much of the finest land could be bought only at a high price from speculators and Mr. Hallock’s means were rather limited. The original house and barn were of oak framework. These with additions are still in use. Mary J. Hatuock, Madison. RupotpH McCuesney Homestead. (1) Description of the land: SW 4 See. 19, T 9N, R 9E, Town of Vienna. (2) Maker of farm: Rudolph McChesney. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from Asa G. Ransom, 1855. 188 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1856. (5) Present owner: Joseph B. McChesney, son of Rudolph McChesney. (6) Date of report: Feb. 5, 1921. The old trail from Madison to Baraboo, used in early days, was within a few rods of the house. JosepH B. McCuesney, Dane. DODGE COUNTY JoHN Brecker Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: E %™NY% Sec. 33, T 11N, R 17E, Town of Herman. (2) Maker of farm: John Becker. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from John Burger, 1859. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1859. (5) Present owner: Peter Becker, son of John Becker. (6) Date of report: Feb. 4, 1921. In 1859 the Becker farm consisted of eighty acres, high and low land, which contained heavy timber and stones. Now the entire tract, with the exception of five acres reserved for pasture, is under cultivation, the low land tiled. The stones have been used in the making of a fence along the entire width of the farm. Peter BEcKER, Rubicon. Nits Erickson Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: . Lot 5 and N part lot 6, Sec. 25; E part NW %44NW % See. 25, all in T 9N, R 16H, Town of Lebanon. (2) Maker of farm: Nils Erickson, native of Hittesdal, Norway. (3) Origin of title: U. S. Govt. patent, 1844. (4) Date of settlement on the land: April, 1845. (5) Present owner: Erick Erickson, son of Nils Erickson. (6) Date of report: Jan. 18, 1921. Mr. Erickson’s first Wisconsin home was at Pine Lake, near Nashotah, where he remained for three years; he then removed to Dodge County, to a farm consisting of rolling land with clay soil, on the west bank of Rock River. Erick Erickson, Ionia. JOHN JONES Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: E %SW %& Sec. 9, TON, R 15E; N70 A. W 3% SE % See. 9, TON, R15E; E42 NW % Sec. 18, T 9N, R 15E, Town of Emmet. (2) Maker of farm: John Jones. (3) Origin of title: U.S. Govt. patent, 1845. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1845. (5) Present owner: David Jones, son of John Jones. (6) Date of report: Jan. 19, 1921. Mr. Jones was looked upon as one of the leading farmers of his community. He took much interest in raising standard-bred horses and shorthorn cattle. Davin JONES, Watertown. DOOR COUNTY Rosert Laurie Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: Lot 3 of See. 18, T 28N, R 26E, Town of Sebastopol. (2) Maker of farm: Robert Laurie, native of Scotland. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from Joseph Woodard, 1854. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1854. (5) Present owner: Christine A. Laurie, daughter of Robert Laurie. (6) Date of re- port: Feb. 14, 1921. Robert Laurie was a ship carpenter in Scotland, and plied his trade for a time after coming, in 1852, to Buffalo, New York, whither his brother Alexander had preceded him. In 1853 they left Buffalo in a boat of their own making, to look for timbered land near the water. Robert obtained a soldier’s claim in Door County, on the shore of Sturgeon Bay, but did not APPENDIX 189 settle on it until the following year. He cleared land and burned lime in the summer time, and in winter worked in the ship yards at Little Sturgeon. Later he developed the stone trade, the Laurie Stone Company being the out- come. CuRISTINE A. LaurIE, Sturgeon Bay. GRANT COUNTY Davin GarpNer Homesreap. (1) Description of the land: N % SW %4 Sw 4, NW %4 SW %, except part in NW corner lying NW of the road; NW ¥% SE%SW%;WYwNEY SW 4; W %NE™%NE% SW \; SE Y, NW 4; part of W % SW %4 NW % lying E of highway passing through same, all in Sec. 21, T 3N, R 1W, Town of Platteville. (2) Maker of farm: David Gardner, native of county of Meath, Ireland; born 1818. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from Thomas Hugill and Major John H. Roun- tree, 1847. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1842. (5) Present owners: John M. Gardner, Mary E. Gardner, Bee A. Gardner, Celia Gardner—children of David Gardner. (6) Date of report: Dec. 15, 1920. When David Gardner emigrated to America he settled first at Grand Gulf, Mississippi. In 1836 he came up the Mississippi River to Ottawa, Illinois, where he remained until 1840, when he came to Platteville. In 1842 he built a double log house with an “upstairs”; a small frame addition was built some years later. The present farm consists of 132 2/3 acres, with a flowing well upon it. D. J. GarRpNER, Platteville. Jacos Hoossr, Sr., Homusreap. (1) Description of the land: N 1h SW Y, and SE %4 NW % See. 22, T 3N, R 1W, Town of Platteville. (2) Maker of farm: Jacob Hooser, Sr., native of Pennsylvania. (3) Origin of title: U. S. Govt. patent, 1831. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1831. (5) Present owner: Sarah B. Young, daughter of Jacob Hooser, Sr. (6) Date of report: Jan. 26, 1921. At the age of thirteen Jacob Hooser, Sr., came up the Mississippi as as- sistant cook on one of the first steamboats operating so far north on that river. He settled in Platteville, three years later removing to the farm de- seribed above. At the outbreak of the Black Hawk War he took his family to Galena and there enlisted. After the capture of Black Hawk he returned to Platteville, where he lived until his death. D. J. Garpner, Platteville. JEFFERSON COUNTY Lorenzo Dow Farco Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: SE %4 NE 1% See. 7, T 7N, R 13E, Town of Lake Mills. (2) Maker of the farm: Lorenzo Dow Fargo, born in 1824, in parish of Chesterfield, Colchester, New London County, Connecticut. (3) Origin of title: U. S. Govt. certificate of purchase, 1846. (4) Date of settlement on land: 1846. (5) Present own- ers: Mrs. Augusta Fargo Anderson and Mrs. Carrie Fargo Bicknell, daughters of Lorenzo Dow Fargo. (6) Date of report: Sept. 12, 1921. In 1845 Lorenzo Dow Fargo joined a party bound for Wisconsin Terri- tory, going by boat from Buffalo to Milwaukee. His brother Enoch, who accompanied him, had a new double wagon, and William Curre, also a fellow traveler, had a span of horses. To quote from Lorenzo Fargo’s Autobi- ography: ‘We joined forces, loaded in carpet bags and started for Lake 190 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Mills. Milwaukee consisted of cheaply constructed residences, a few pioneer stores and shops. We drove on into the 12-mile forest of beech, maple, bass- wood, elm, ash and oak. The road pretended to be a highway; but was one stretch of dodging mud holes and trees and constantly repairing the corduroy road. The first night we spent in a little half-way house in Wauwatosa. The second at MeVane’s double log hotel, where we paid fifty cents apiece for two square meals and lodging. Near Summit corners we had our first sight of a Wisconsin prairie and saw our first prairie chickens. Here was rich soil waiting for the pioneer’s big breaking plough to turn the furrows. . . Aztalan was a booming town. On the third night, November 8, 1845, we reached Lake Mills and spent that night at the Morgan Bartlett ital “In February, 1846, I bought out Lon Perry’s claim and went right to work getting out fencing.” Mr. Fargo gradually added to his farm until it embraced over 500 acres. He was a great lover of nature, and in his last years he “turned his time and strength to reforesting his own woods and by his pen endeavored to arouse the people to a realization of the importance and necessity of planting trees for future generations.” The Lorenzo Dow Fargo Free Public Library of Lake Mills was a gift of Mr. and Mrs. Fargo to the city. Mrs. Carrie Farco BIcKNELL, Los Angeles, Cal. MANITOWOC COUNTY GrorGeE GoupieE Homestgeap. (1) Description of the land: W%NW% Sec. 23, T 19N, R 23E, Town of Newton. (2) Maker of the farm: George Goldie, native of Connaught, Scotland. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from James T. Goldie, 1851. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1851. (5) Present owner: George S. Goldie, son of George Goldie. (6) Date of re- port: June 13, 1921. George Goldie and his brother James emigrated to America in 1849, coming directly to Wisconsin, where they obtained land. They spent their winters clearing land, and their summers sailing the Great Lakes. In 1853 George Goldie abandoned sailing, built a log house, and devoted himself seriously to making a fine farm out of the wilderness. Grorce 8. Goupiz, Timothy. JoHN SrangeL Homestead. (1) Description of the land: S%SE% NW %, S% SW % NW &%, NW % SW % Sec. 5; NE %& SE Y% and SE %4 SE & See. 6, all in T 21N, R 24K, Town of Tisch Mills. (2) Maker of farm: John Stangel, native of Bohemia. (3) Origin of title: Claims received from the state in 1853, by Joseph Stangel, brother of Johu Stangel. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1856. (5) Present owner: Wencel M. Stangel, son of John Stangel. (6) Date of report: July, 1921. John Stangel and his wife took pride in the fact that they were owners of property, and labored untiringly to clear the land. When the govern- ment laid out its public roads, the Stangel homestead lay a quarter of a mile from the highway. A new site was therefore selected and buildings erected; the original house is still on the premises but is no longer used as a home. Mr. Stangel took a deep interest in education and religion. The records of the APPENDIX 191 school district show that he served as a school officer for several years. The first Catholic church in the locality in which he lived was constructed mainly from lumber which he donated. Wence M. StanceEt, Tisch Mills. PIERCE COUNTY Isaac I. Foster Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: S %SW 4% See. 12, T 27N, R 19W, Town of River Falls. (2) Maker of the farm: Isaac I. Foster. (3) Origin of title: U.S. Govt. patent about 1840. (4) Present owner: Mrs. W. H. Putnam, granddaughter of Isaac I. Foster. (5) Date of report: Jan. 7, 1921. Isaac I. Foster was at one time county judge of Pierce County. Mrs. W. H. Putnam, River Falls. RACINE COUNTY Prerer MoursacHer Homestead. (1) Description of the land: E 4% NE 4 Sec. 13, T 4N, R 22K, Town of Caledonia. (2) Maker of the farm: Peter Mohrbacher. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from John A. Carswell and Horace Norton, 1847. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1847. (5) Present owner: Adam C. Mohrbacher, son of Peter Mohrbacher. (6) Date of report: Dee. 28, 1920. The price of the twenty acres of land purchased from Horace Norton was the hauling of a hundred loads of charcoal and barrels that were made on the place. For the rest of the land Mr. Mohrbacher paid $4.50 an acre. The original farm buildings are still standing; the present owner has bought land nearer the main highway, upon which modern structures have been erected. Apam C. MonrpacHeEr, Racine. RICHLAND COUNTY Wiuuiam Pickering Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: NE %4 See. 8, N14 SE 4% and S % NE & See. 9, all in T 9N, R 1W, Town of Eagle. (2) Maker of the farm: William Pickering, born in Lancashire, England, in 1818. (3) Origin of title: U.S. Govt. certificates of purchase, 1850. (4) Date of settlement on the land, 1853. (5) Present owner: Charles R. Pickering, son of William Pickering. (6) Date of report: July 18, 1921. William Pickering left England in 1848 and came to Wisconsin for the purpose of owning a home—a goal he could not hope to reach in England. He believed that timber land would remain fertile longer than prairie land, and sought it first in the direction of Oshkosh. There he found that none other than pine land was subject to entry, and this he did not desire. He then retraced his steps toward Milwaukee and started westward. He learned that good land could be obtained in Eagle Township, and accordingly he entered the parcels described above—heavily timbered land nine miles north of Wisconsin River. Here he grappled with the forests and carved out a pro- ductive farm, in complete contrast with those farms of sandy soil on the south bank of the river. C. R. PickERInNG, Muscoda. ST. CROIX COUNTY S. H. Burr Homestseap. (1) Description of the land: N %NW %, N % NE %, N &% SE | See. 30, T 28N, R 18W, Town of Kinnickinnick. 192 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK (2) Maker of the farm: Solomon Hale Burr, native of Conway, Massachu- setts. (3) Origin of title: Warranty deed from George W. Pratt, 1855. (4) Date of settlement on the land: April, 1855. (5) Present owner: Mrs. Louie Burr Fuller, daughter of Solomon H. Burr. (6) Date of report: Jan. 19, 1921. Mr. Burv’s first home in the West was at Princeton, Illinois, where he remained for twenty-two years. His Wisconsin farm was only one and one- half miles from River Falls, and is today one of the most picturesque farms on the well-known Kinnickinnick trout stream. During the antislavery con- tention Mr. Burr was a co-worker of Owen Lovejoy and a firm friend of the fugitive slave. Mrs. C. W. Fuuuer, River Falls. Grorce W. Fuuuter Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: NE %4 Nw 4, SW %NW %, NW \% NW % See. 22, T 28N, R 18W, Town of Kinnickinnick. (2) Maker of the farm: George W. Fuller, native of Madison, Ohio. (3) Origin of title: Warranty deed from James G. Crowns, 1854. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1855. (5) Present owner: Frank N. Fuller, son of George W. Fuller. (6) Date of report: Jan. 18, 1921. When Mr. Fuller bought his farm in the town of Kinnickinnick, about ten acres were cleared and there was a log house on it. Soon he put up a frame dwelling, hauling the lumber from Eau Galle. The nearest market was Hud- son, fifteen miles distant. Mr. Fuller was a power in promoting whatever was best for his community. Frank N. Four, River Falls. SAUK COUNTY Sotomon Kine Homesreap. (1) Description of the land: NE%NW% and 8 % NW ¥ See. 3, T 10N, R GE; W % SE 4 and E 4 SW % See. 34, T 11N, R 68, all in the Town of Sumpter. (2) Maker of farm: Solomon King, native of Ohio. (3) Origin of title: U.S. Govt. patent and private purchase, 1848. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1856. (5) Present owner: Elias D. King, son of Solomon King (all but three acres has been sold). (6) Date of report: Dee. 19, 1920. The King homestead is unique in the following particulars: 1. It contains the “first cireular silo on route 12 between Baraboo and Prairie du Sae.” 2. Its owner was the “first to use galvanized steel roofing, and also to use tiling for draining the farm.” 3. Its owner was the “first to practice subsoiling of land, which was done with profit.” En1as D. Kine, Prairie du Sac. WALWORTH COUNTY Awson B. WarNER HomesteaD. (1) Description of the land: W % SW \% Sec. 6, T 4N, R 15H, Town of Whitewater. (2) Maker of farm: Anson B. Warner. (3) Origin of title: Purchase from Hoppins family, 1847. (4) Date of settlement on the land: 1847. (5) Present owner: H. R. Warner, grandson of Anson B. Warner. (6) Date of report: Jan. 3, 1921. Anson B. Warner paid $9.00 an acre for the land; the present owner would not sell it for $350 an acre. Originally the north half of the farm was covered with scattered oaks and hazel brush. Some of the remainder had been broken with an ox team, but the work had been so poorly done that it had to be done APPENDIX 193 again. A log house served as a home for the family for three years. This was replaced by a frame house which stood for fourteen years. The present brick house dates from about 1864. H. R. WarNER, Whitewater. WASHINGTON COUNTY Wiuu1am Murray Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: EK 4% NW Y% and NE 4% SW %& See. 33, T 12N, R 20E, Town of Farmington. (2) Maker of the farm: William Murray, born in 1815, in Scotland. (3) Origin of title: U.S. certificates of purchase, 1848 and 1854. (4) Date of settle- ment on the land: 1848. (5) Present owner: William A. Murray, son of William Murray. (6) Date of report: Dec. 15, 1920. The Murray homestead is now a dairy farm. Three gravel pits are also a source of income. Merton W. Murray, West Bend. WAUKESHA COUNTY Jackson Kemper Homesteap. (1) Description of the land: NW % See. 18, T 7N, R 18E, Town of Merton, and lots 1 and 2 and NE fr. 14 See. 13, T 7N, R 17E, Town of Summit. (2) Maker of the farm: Jackson Kemper, bishop of Wisconsin. (3) Origin of title: In part from the Territory of Wisconsin by Henry Dodge, governor; a patent dated July 17, 1846; and a part from United States by patent January 1, 1850. (4) Date of settle- ment on the land: 1846. (5) Present owner: Mary Ann Kemper Lemon, granddaughter of Jackson Kemper. (6) Date of report: Apr. 18, 1921. Bishop Kemper’s farm was adjacent to Nashotah Mission. The road pass- ing the house was a military road from Fort Dearborn to Fort Winnebago; it is said that Jefferson Davis laid it out and worked it. The road was also used by the lead miners of Galena, Illinois, who were often seen with four or six yoke of oxen hauling wagons loaded with pig lead. The Bishop always employed a farmer to work the land. The house as it now stands consists of a frame portion built in 1846 and a stone addition erected in the early sixties. The Kemper home was for many years the center of hospitality for all connected with Nashotah House. Mrs. CHarues H. Lemon, Milwaukee. ay esa =,” Wy ‘a a by! Y ‘i Thal a? MN is) ay ii ae Ne Ne He i Mi i han iN Ae Geile 4 i 1h a ne (I bd ee eT ) ayy ) ih Wi ty wees Anwis ae ah ‘o uh ; 4 mi ik a enn { th) Mery aN f fait a eid 4 Bath ict ni! ~ oar Wr sere gts ial ! ; Hires act. | | fy) i nt Tub ee vee feu Psi ie F : / ue a dl Waly , j ny ae #8, st INDEX Pili hultent Mat At ra VAN) at as ey PE IMVAA UO Ly CUNT RN RS PNM ae tei ' wey. tL AN (Nt : \ ! ie ae HAT p | ney rin Nth Vai hota: it ff AAW y } i Ii hay MAD iy ih i ay } i wea hy iN i i i / ij f i Y if j | Mo i | i 4 Tl eS ah ray } ul vein i Aa PUN ia 0 en tt ' a 1 inst eta ii ne) NAT ey | We tAy ty ql! AY I \ i hp in AN Han My Ai Mi if 7 i i yon } 1 \ } | f ANY j , | i i ilk \ | | | ba) iy | } j sar , f i iit Me Lay | ! | h it y My (Ny Mn TO BI INDEX ABLEMAN, horse prizes for, 120. Adams, Gilbert, horse breeder, 119. Adams County, topography of, 3, 131; foreign born in, 49; wheat production in 1860, 136. Addison County (Vt.), farms in, 59. Agricultural revolution, 149-164. Agricultural Society. See Wisconsin State Agricultural Society. Albany (N. Y.), as a market, 58-59. Alderneys, at state fair of 1860, 116. Allegheny River, transportation on, 59. Alluvial soil, defined, 7. America, colonial, exports of wheat from, 82. Americans, as Wisconsin immi- grants, 45-49, 57-64, 78; in north- ern Wisconsin, 141; as dairymen, 162. See also the several sections and states. Appleby, John F., invents “knot- ter,” 89, 93. Arena, on Wisconsin River, 26, 41. Argyle, on edge of prairie, 18. Ashland County, population of, 145. Aspen trees, in Wisconsin, 17. Ayrshires, at state fair of 1860, 116. Aztalan, goods for, 69-70. Baszcock, Stephen Moulton, invents milk tester, 160. Baden, emigrants from, 53. Bangor, in LaCrosse County, 54; wheat crops in, 93-94. Baraboo River, settlement begun on, 130. Barber, Milton, dairyman, 153. Barley, production of,. 102. Barns, types of, 67-69, 79, 167. Barron Hills, location, 2. Baseball, introduced, 175. Bavaria, emigrants from, 53. Bayfield County, population of, 145. Bear valley (Richland County), dairying in, 155. Beckley, Hosea, History of Ver- mont, 62. Beckwith brothers, dairymen, 155. Belgian, breed of horses, 120. Beloit, settlements near, 33; ferry at, 74. Bennington County (Vt.), farms in, 59. Berkshire, breed of swine, 113. Berkshire Agricultural Society, founded, 113. Big Quinisee Falls, surveys reach, 135. Binders, in harvest fields, 87; inven- tion of self, 89. Birge, Mrs. Imogene Starin, donor, 65. Birge, Julius C., letter, 68. Black, James A., cheese factory promoter, 156. Black Hawk War, importance of, 26. Blackhawk, breed of horses, 117- 118; distribution of, 118. Black River, lumbering on, 132. Black River Falls, topography of, oy oe Black River valley, surveyed, 135. Blasting, mode of stumping, 131. Blue Mounds, road via, 74. Blue River, topography of, 12-13; dairying in valley, 156. Bonanza farming, described, 88. Boston, as a market, 59. Bottomley, Edwin, English settler, 56, 76. British. See English and Scotch. Bear valley 198 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK British agriculture, crisis in, 83; de- cline of wheat growing, 83. British-Americans. See French- Canadians. British régime, in Wisconsin, 23-24. British Temperance Emigration So- ciety, colony, 56. Brighton (Kenosha Co.), dairy products, 151. Bristol (Kenosha Co.), dairy prod- ucts, 151. Brookfield, in Waukesha County, 51-52; foreign born in, 54. Brooklyn, horse prizes for, 120. Brooks, Seymour, exhibitor, 116; dispersal sale of shorthorns, 116. Brown County, soil, 144; forested area, 13, 17, 40; population in 1836, 27; map of, 28; foreign born in, 57; corn grown in, 100. Buffalo (N. Y.), lake port, 64. Buffalo County, driftless area of, 10; forested area, 17; soil of, 144; foreign born in, 53; wheat pro- duction in, 95, 136-137. Buffalo valley, surveyed, 135. Bull, Stephen, horse breeder, 119. Bulls, confined, 115. Burlington, road to, 76. Burnett County, forested area, 17. Burrows, George B., bequest, xi; home of, 58. Buschbauer, Hans, agricultural lead- er, 163. Butter, production of, 97. Byfield, breed of hogs, 115. Catrp, Sir James, Prairie Farming in America, 63. Caledonia, in Columbia County, 54. California, emigration to, 90. Calumet County, forested area, 13, 40. Cambria, in Columbia County, 54. Cambrian rocks, location, 3, 5, 8-11, 19. Camp Douglas, rocks near, 3. Camp meeting, in Racine County, 172. Canada, Wisconsin a part of, 1; emigrants from, 57. See also French-Canadians. Carswell, John A., prominent dairy- man, 155. Case, Jerome I., threshing machine inventor and manufacturer, 89; horse breeder, 119. Cassville, mining town, 26. Castle Rock, wheat grown in, 94. Cataract, in Monroe County, 56. Cattle, imported, 6; increase of, 97; distribution of, 101-102; exhibits of, 115; feeders, 166. See also the several breeds—Ayrshire, ete. Cayuga County (N. Y.), dairymen, 155. Census of 1836, population, 27. Census of 1850, statistics, 37, 44, 54, 64; described, 45; analyzed, 46- 56; manuscript schedules, 46. Champlain Lake, farms on, 58-59; transportation on, 61, 64. Cheese, increased production of, 97; imported, 154; dairying for, 151; makers, 160. Cheese press, illustration, 151. Cheshire, breed of swine, 113. Chicago, trail from, 26, 32, 35, 74, 77; effect on settlement, 31; canal project, 32; lumber companies, 67-68; lake port, 70, 78; dairy market, 151. Chicago and Northwestern Railway, route, 12. China pig, breed of swine, 113. Chinch bug, damages by, 93. Chippewa County, soil of, 144. Chippewa Indians, in Wisconsin, 1; land cession, 134. Chippewa River, lumbering on, 44, 68, 132. Chippewa valley, survey in, 135. Chittenden County (Vt.), farms in, 59. Churches. See Rural churches. INDEX 199 Cireus, children’s day at, 177. Civil War, effect on agriculture, 84; on agricultural machinery, 88; on horse breeding, 118. Clam River, surveys reach, 135. Clapp, N. B., exhibitor of purebred sheep, 114. Clark, Charles M., cited, 117. Clark, Hiram C., History of Che- nango County, 62. Clark, John M., exhibitor of “Gen- eral Gifford,’ Morgan horse, 118; home of, 72. Clearing. See Lands. Clover, in rotation with wheat, 95; spread of culture of, 110. Clydesdale, breed of horses, 120. College of Agriculture, influence on dairying, 154, 159-161; extension division, 160; stumping experi- ments, 143. Columbia County, foreign born in, 54-55; farms, 78; frame houses, 78; grain production in, 99-100, 102. Commons, for early settlers, 36, 78. Communism, in Wisconsin, 57. Connor, L. G., Sheep Industry, 122. Cooperstown, in Manitowoe County, 52. Copeland, Louis A., “The Cornish Element in Southwestern Wiscon- sin,” 49. Corn, grown in South, 81; not adapted to Wisconsin, 98; in- creased production, 97; types of, 98; best lands for, 98-99; produc- tion by counties, 99; table of, 102; substitute for wheat, 99. Corn Laws, in England, 82. Cornish, in Wisconsin, 48-49, 56. Cotswold, breed of imported sheep, 113. County fairs, promote good. live- stock, 113. Courtland, in Columbia County, 54. Cows, dual purpose of, 158; num- ber of purebreds, 164. See also Cattle. Cradle, harvesting implement, 87; illustration, 92. Cradlers, in harvest fields, 87. Cram, Captain T. J., map of 1839, 40 Crawford County, in driftless area, 10; forested area, 17; prairies in, 18; population in 1836, 27; map of, 28; settlements in, 42, 79; for- eign born in, 57. Creamery, illustration, 161. Crookes, Sir Willian, cited, 81. Curtler, W. H. R., History of Eng- lish Agriculture, 83. Cushing, Caleb, buys Wisconsin land, 30. Darry School in Wisconsin Univer- sity, founded, 160; illustration, 160. Dairying, in Vermont, 62; before factory system, 149; in 1860 sum- marized, 152-153; products, 105- 106; new methodology of success, 179; effect on farming, 164. Dairymen’s Association. See Wis- consin Dairymen’s Association. Dames, William, Wie Sieht Es in Wiskonsin aus, 38, 53. Dances, as community exercises, 175-176. Dane County, driftless area of, 10; early settlements, 36, 78; towns in, 43; foreign born, 50-51, 53, 56; grain production in, 99-100, 102, 136; livestock in, 103; rural population, 147. Danes, in Wisconsin, 47, 51, 145. Dayton, prize horses in, 120. De Forest, bonanza farm in, 88. Delafield, in Waukesha County, 54. Delavan, settled, 33. Delaware River, transportation on, 59. 200 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Devon, breed of cattle, 113-114, 155; illustration, 116. Dickey, A. P., horse breeder, 119. Diversified farming, discussed, 97- 129; area, 104; effect on immi- gration, 111; changes toward, 109, Aid, Dodge County, geology of, 5; for- ested area, 13, 40; foreign born in, 52-53, 57; roads in, 76; farms in, 78; grain production in, 99- 100, 102, 136. Dodgeville, mining town, 26. Door County, forested area, 17, 40; trmber burned, 142; soil, 144; wheat production in, 136; fruit, 165. Douglas County, population in 1845, 144. Dousman, George B., at Milwaukee, 69-70. Drift, defined, swamps, 19. Driftless Area, location, 3, 6-7; map of, 9; described, 9-13; free from marshes, 19; lead mines in, 24; settlement in, 91. Dubuque, Julien, lead miner, 24. Dubuque County (Ia.), lead mines in, 24. Dunkirk (N. Y.), as a terminus, 63. Dunn County, prairies in, 10; soil of, 144. Durham, breed of cattle, 155; illus- tration, 116. Dutch, in Wisconsin, 38, 47, 57. Dwight, Timothy, Travels in New England and New York, 65, 77. 7-8; effect on HAGLE, wheat growing in, 94. Eaton, H. L., Bear valley dairyman, 155. Eau Claire County, driftless area of, 10; soil, 144. Edwards, S. B., hog breeder, 127- 128. Eilson, Elling, home of, 52. Elkhorn Prairie, location, 18; set- tled, 33. Elmira (N. Y.), as a terminus, 63. Emerson, Ralph Waldo, buys Wis- consin land, 30. Emigration, from Wisconsin, 139; from poor farms, 178. Emmet, in Jefferson County, 54. Empire, in Fond du Lae County, 54, 94. Enclosures—1851-71, in England, 83. English, in Wisconsin, 46, 49-50, 54, 56-67. See also Cornish. English Prairie. See Muscoda. Episcopalians, in Wisconsin, 57. Erie Canal, importance of, 59, 63. Erosion, effects of, 10-13, 19, 21. Ksterly, George, invents harvesting machine, 88, 92. European immigrants. See the sev- eral nations. Everett, Edward, buys Wisconsin land, 30. Factory system, in New York, 154. Farm life in Wisconsin, 165-181; effects on children, 172-173; com- bined with lumbering, 140-141. Farmers’ institutes, influence of, 161. Favill, Asa, pioneer dairyman, 153. Favill, Stephen, famous dairyman, 153: Feed producing area, limits of, 104. Fences, kinds of, 167. Fennimore, valley at, 13; dairying in, 156. Ferries, in pioneer Wisconsin, 74. Fever River, steamboats on, 26. Finns, in New North, 145. Fish, H. Z., cheese maker, 156. Fish, in northern Wisconsin, 148. Flambeau Ridge, location, 2. Florence County, forested area in, 141, 143. INDEX SOOKE 201 Fond du Lac, on edge of prairie, 18; settlement, 40; railroad to, 91. Fond du Lac County, forested area, 13, 40; foreign born in, 52, 54, 56-57; roads in, 76; farms, 78; grain production, 100, 102; live- stock, 103; dairying, 153. Food, easily procured by pioneers, 70-71. Foreigners, in early settlements, 37- 40, 45-57, 79; assimilation of, 168; farm jeedkties of, 178; ar- ae among, 168. See ales the several nationalities — Dutch, English, Germans, ete. Forest County, forested area in, 141. Forests, area of, 13, 17, 19, 21-22; map of, 16; clearing of, 22, 76- 77, 143; burned tracts in, 141- 142; relation to wheat growing, 95. Fort Crawford, location, 12; trail to, 26; road to, 74. Fort Howard, road to, 12, 74. Fort Winnebago, location, 12; trail to, 26; road to, 74; timber for, 132. Foster, Mary Stuart, aid acknowl- edged, xiii, 25. Four Lakes region, topography, 12. Fowler, John, Journal of a Tour in the State of New York, 64. Fox Indians, in Wisconsin, 1. Fox River, buried forest on, 13; forests on, 19; farming, 41. Fox River Canal, plans for, 78; opening of, 134. Fox River (Pishtaka} of the Illi- nois, settlement along, 32-33, 36, 50, 56. Fox- ‘Wisconsin waterway, historical importance of, 1; as a boundary, 18, 26-27. Franklin, settlement of, 38, 54. Franklin County (Vt.), farms in, 59. Freistadt colony, in Washington County, 52. : French régime, in Wisconsin, 23- 2A, 43. French-Canadians, in ee AT, 57. fe Furniture, in - pioneer Wisconsin, 69-70": Fur trade, era of, 23-24. GALENA (Ill.), lead mines near, 2A, 26; road to, 74. . ’ Galena-Blackriver, strata, 5, 10, 24. Game, early abundance, 71; in northern Wisconsin, 148. Gardening, among foreign settlers, 168. Gardner, David, pioneer, 69-70. Garland, Hamlin, A Son of the Middle Border, 89, 167. Gascoyne, Philip, pioneer dairy- . man, 151. fr Genesee, in Waukesha County, A, pe 57. Geneva Lake, settlements near, BR contest at, 73. Geology, of Wisconsin, 1- 29, Germans, in Wisconsin, 38, 47, 49- 54, 78, 141. Glacial action, in Wisconsm, . 6- 9, : 13. Goff, Emmett S., investigates north- : ern idee neat 140. Grant, Ulysses .S., Report on the | Lead and Zine evans! 2A, 44. Grant County, in driftless area, 10; prairies in, 18; lead mines in, 24; part of Iowa‘ County; 27; native born in, 47-48; foreign born, 49, 56-57; grain production in, 99- ' 100, 102; swine in, 103; butter sale, 149. A Grasses, relation to dairying, 106- ' 107. pike Great Britain. ture. Great Plains, wheat growing in, 82. See British agricul- 202 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Green Bay, forest on, 13, 17, 19; towns on, 41, 43-44; sawmills, 130. Green Bay (town), fort at, 12, 74; early settlement, 23; trail to, 26, ' 35, 74, 77-78; land office at, 30. Green County, geology of, 5; drift- less area of, 10; prairies in, 18; lead mines, 24, 48; towns in, 43; roads, 76; native born in, 47; foreign born, 49, 54; grain pro- duction in, 99-100; dairying in, 152-153. Green Lake County, wheat raising in, 95, 136. Groves, H. D., breeder, 114. Guernsey, breed of cattle, 164. Gypsum, used on clover, 95. “HAMBLETONIAN,” blooded horse, 114. Hamilton, William S., lead mine pioneer, 41. Hard times, among farmers, 90-91. Harvest, inventions for, 87-88; ‘labor, 87; in 1853, 91. Hay, from marshes, 85; increased production of, 97; statistics, 101- 102. Hazel Green, on edge of prairie, 18. Hazen, Chester, famous dairyman, 157. Heart Prairie, houses on, 67; home of inventor, 88. Helena, settlement of, 41. Henry, William A., founds the short course, 159; dairy school, 160; Feeds and Feeding, 160; North- ern Wisconsin, 140-145; portrait, 150. Herds, process of improving, 180; books for registry, 113. See also Cattle. Hereford, breed of cattle, 116. Herkimer County (N. Y.), dairy- men, 155. Hibbard, B. H., History of Agri- culture in Dane County, 109, 111. Hickory trees, in Wisconsin, 17. Highland, wheat growing in, 94. Hiram Smith Hall, illustration, 160. Hinckley, B. M., 155. Hoard, William D., program of dairy development, 154, 157-159; editor, 156; portrait, 150. Hogs, in early Wisconsin, 71, 97; improvements in breeds, 113, 126- 129; distribution of, 103; first ex- hibit of, 115. Holland, emigrants from, 38, 47, 57. Holstein, breed of cattle, 164. Hops, furore for growing, 109. Horses, distribution of, 97, 103; substitute for oxen, 107; entries at state fair, 113; breeds of, 117- 121; breeders, 119. Horticultural Society. See Wiscon- sin Horticultural Society. Hoyt, John W., early agricultural- ist, 92, 159; sketch of, 108-109; portrait, 107. Hudson River, transportation on, 58-59. Hughes, John, Welsh settler, 54. Huron Indians, in Wisconsin, 1. Inurnors, driftless area in, 9; lead mines, 24, 31; boundary, 18, 26, 43; settlers from, 26, 47-48; canals in, 32; lumber market, 68, 132; wheat growing in, 84; horse prizes for, 120; source of sheep supply, 123. Illinois River, tributaries, 32. Immigration, state board created, 140. Indiana, settlers from, 47; colony in, 57; wheat growing in, 84; source of sheep supply, 123. Indians, of Wisconsin, 1, 23-24; land cessions, 26, 134. Interest rates, extortionate, 91. Iowa, driftless area in, 9; lead mines, 24; lumber market, 68, 132. INDEX 203 Iowa County, in driftless area, 10; lead mines in, 24; population in 1836, 27; map of, 28; native born in, 47-48; foreign born in, 49, 54, 56; grain production, 99-100; swine in, 103. Irish, in Wisconsin, 38, 45-46, 49, 51-52, 54, 57. Iron County, population of, 145. Ixonia, in Jefferson County, 52, 54. JACOBSON, Edna Louise, aid ac- knowledged, xiii; compiles Cen- sus of Old Homesteads, 186-193. Jackson County, topography of, 3; in driftless area, 10; soil of, 144. Janesville, settlements near, 33, 69; roads to, 74, 79; horse prizes for, 120. Jarvis, Consul William, imports merino sheep, 113, 122. Jefferson County, geology of, 5; forested area, 13, 40; farm lands in, 31, 79; settled, 33, 36; towns in, 43; foreign born in, 52-54, 56; grain production in, 100, 102; dairying promoted in, 157. Jefferson County Union, influence on dairy development, 157. Jersey, breed of cattle, 164. Jo Daviess County (Ill.), lead mines in, 24. Johnston, James, pioneer miner, 26. Juneau County, topography of, 3; in driftless area, 10; wheat pro- duction, 136. Kansas, Wisconsin people in, 139. Kegonsa Lake, loeation, 18. Kelley, , horse breeder, 119. Kellogg, Louise P., aid acknowl- edged, xiii; “Story of Wisconsin,” 23, 80. Kenosha, lake port, 32; frame houses at, 67; lumber for, 68; road to, 76. Kenosha County, forested area, 13; prairies in, 18; settlements, 33, 37, 77; established, 33; towns in, 43; density of population, 44; native born in, 48-49; foreign born, 56; houses in, 67; improved lands in 1850, 86; livestock, 103, 114; grain production in, 95, 99- 100; dairying, 151-152. Kentucky, settlers from, 26, 47-48; horses, 118-119; wheat growing in, 84, Kewaunee County, forested area, 17, 40; soil of, 144; wheat pro- duction in 1860, 136. Kichtmyer (Kichtneys), Nicholas, Kenosha dairyman, 151. Kickapoo River, lumbering on, 135. Kilbourn, topography of, 3, 8. King, F. A., investigates northern Wisconsin, 140. King, Rufus, “The New York and Erie Railroad,” 63. “King of Cymry,” blooded horse, A Kirchayn, in Washington County, 52. Kittle, Wiliam, The History of the Township and Village of Mazo- manie, 56. LacHer, J. H. A., early taverns and stages, 80. La Crosse, lumber port, 135; rail- way to, 91, 135. La Crosse County, in driftless area, 10; prairie in, 19; foreign born in, 54; soil of, 144; wheat pro- duction, 136. La Crosse Prairie, location, 19; houses on, 68-69. Lafayette, in Monroe County, 56. Lafayette County, in driftless area, 10; prairies in, 18; lead mines in, 24; part of Iowa County, 27; native born in, 47-48; foreign born, 49, 54, 56; grain produc- tion, 99-100; swine in, 103. 204 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Lakes, inland, 2; formed by gla- ciers, 7; none in driftless area, be Lands, characteristics, 1-22; classi- fication, 27; sales offices, 30; clearing methods, 76-77; prices, 143; improved area in 1850 and 1860, 86-87; burned over, 142; cut over, 142; sale of school, 91. Langlade County, forested area, 141. Lathrop, S. P., cited, 114. Lawe, John, pioneer lumberman, 68. Lead mines, location, 24-27; trails in, 25, 74; map of, 25; as a mar- ket, 31; markets for, 40; local government of, 43; native born in, 48; foreign born, 49; railroads in, 79. See also Grant, Iowa, and Lafayette counties. Lebanon, in Dodge County, 52. Legler, George, dairyman, 153. Leicester, breed of hogs, 113, 115. Levi, Kate A. Everest, “German Immigration to Wisconsin,” 52- 53. Linden trees, in Wisconsin, 17. Lisbon, in Waukesha County, 57. Liverpool (England), emigrants from, 56. Livestock, increase of, 97; at first state fair, 113; purity of blood, 113-114; grades improved, 121- 122, 166. See also Cattle, Hogs, Horses, and Sheep. Livingston, Chancellor Robert R., importer of merinos, 113. Local government, in Wisconsin, 42-43. Lodi, on edge of prairie, 18; wheat growing at, 94. Loess soil, defined, 7. Log cabin, types of, 66, 68. Louisiana province, Wisconsin’s re- lations to, 1. Luchsinger, John, on New Glarus, 50. Lumbering, early operations, 17, 22, 40, 44; by farmers, 39, 67-68, 76, 130-148; market for farm prod- ucts, 44; kinds of woods, 139-140; values of, 132-133; market for, 132; illustrations, 133. Lumbermen, emigrated from state, 139. Luxemburg, emigrants from, 53. Lyon, Lueius, surveyor, 30. McCasuin Mountain, location, 2. McCormick, Cyrus, invents reaper, 88. McCormick Reaper Company, 88. McKinnon, Captain , importer of “King of Cymry,” 117. MeMillan, Morrison, cited, 69. Madison, on edge of prairie, 18; made the capital, 41; road to, 74, 79; horse prizes for, 120. Magdeburg (Germany), emigration from, 52. Maine, settlers from, 47. Manitowoc, sawmill at, 68. Manitowoe County, buried forest in, 13; forested area, 17, 19, 40, 68; foreign born in, 47, 52-54; grain production in, 100, 102. Maple trees, areas of, 13, 16-17, 22. Maps: United States, 2. Wisconsin geologieal, 4. Driftless area, 9. Prairie areas, 14-15. Forested area, 16. Swamp land, 20. The lead region, 25. Counties in 1836, 28. Surveyed section in 1836, 29. Mount Pleasant, 34. Township organization, 1848, 42. Population in 1850, 48. Vermont and New York canals, 60. Lines of communication, 1844, 75. The New North, 138. INDEX 205 Marathon County, driftless area of, 10; leads in rural population, 145-146; farm in, 142. Marinette County, forested area, 141. Markets, for local customers, 150; for cereals, 102; for dairy prod- ucts, 149; for American cheese, 154; city commission merchants, 151; foreign, 81, 154. Marquette County, foreign born in, 54; Muir farm, 55; soil of, 144; oak openings in, 131; wheat pro- duction, 136. Marsh harvester, value of, 88. Marsh land, amount of, 7; areas, 17, 19, 35; map of, 20. Martin, Lawrence, The Physical Geography of Wisconsin, 13, 22. Maryland, wheat growing in, 84. Massachusetts, settlers from, 47; pioneer life in, 65. Mazomanie, English colony at, 56; horse prizes for, 120. Menominee Indians, in Wisconsin, 1; land cession, 134. Mequon, in Ozaukee County, 52. Merinos, imported, 113; illustra- tions, 117, 124. Merk, Frederick, Economic History, 109. Meyer, Balthaser H., “Railway Legislation,” 41; home of, 174. Meyer, Casper Henry, portrait, 53. Michigan, settlers from, 47. Michigan Lake, as a boundary, 1, 18, 26, 43; forests on, 13, 68; lumbering, 132; ports, 31, 33, 80; transportation on, 63. Michigan Territory, Wisconsin a part of, 30. Military Ridge, location of, 12-13, 74; prairies near, 18, 79. Mills, in early Wisconsin, 39; at Whitewater, 67; on lake shore, 68; grist, 71-72; saw, 130, 133; sites for, 73. Milwaukee, location, 31; enterprise, 32; land office at, 35, 67, 72; as a port, 39, 50, 53, 69, 78; foreign born at, 53; lumber for, 68; cen- ter for roads, 74, 79; dairy mar- ket, 151. Milwaukee and Mississippi Railway, built, 41-42, 91; value of, 135. Milwaukee and Rock River Canal, projected, 32, 37. Milwaukee County, forested area, 13, 78; boundary, 33; original area, 27-28; farm lands in, 30, 78; foreign born in, 37-38, 40, 47, 53-55, 57; towns in, 43; density of population, 44; grain produc- tion, 99, 102; dairying in, 152. Milwaukee River, settlement on, 52. Mineral Point, mining town, 26; land office at, 30; road to, 74, 76. Mining region, settlement, 24-27. See also Lead Mines. Minnesota, driftless area in, 9; Wis- consin people in, 139. Mississippi River, as a boundary, 1-2, 18; erosion, 10-11; prairies on, 19; steamboats on, 26, 41; transportation on, 31-32, 135; lumbering on, 44, 68; pineries on, 132. Mississippi Valley, lumber market, 132. Missouri, settlers from, 26, 48; lum- ber market, 68, 132. Mitchell, Alexander, financial pio- neer, 55. Mohawk River, transportation on, 59. Mohawk valley, settlers from, 65. Monroe County, topography of, 3; in driftless area, 10; foreign born in, 54; soil of, 144; wheat pro- duction in, 136. Morgan, line of blooded horses, 117- 118, 121. Morrill Law, for agricultural col- leges, 159. 206 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Mortgage, indebtedness, 91. Motor ear, effect on good roads, 179. Mount Pleasant Town, settled, 33- 37; map of land entries, 34; for- eign born in, 54, 167; improved lands in 1850, 85; grain produc- tion, 93, 99; sheep raised in, 124. Muir, John, The Story of My Boy- hood and Youth, 55, 173; homes of, 66, 174. Murray, George, stock breeder, 55, 116-117, 119. Muscoda (English Prairie), trail to, 26, 41; wheat in, 94; board of trade, 156. Music, Welsh contributions, 55. NasHoraH, Episcopal seminary at, 57. Natesta, Henry, home of, 168. Neapolitan, breed of hogs, 115. Nebraska, Wisconsin people in, 139. Necedah Hill, location, 3. New Diggings, mining town, 26. New England, settlers from, 37, 47- 49, 57-64; pioneer days in, 64-65; wheat growers in, 84; surplus dairy produets, 154. New Glarus, colony of Swiss, 49-50, 54; wheat growing in, 94; church at, 59. New Hampshire, pioneer days in, 65-66. New Jersey, settlers from, 58. New North, region defined, 137; map of, 138; population at sev- eral censuses, 136-137, 139, 145; farming conditions in, 137, 147; foreign born in, 146; native born, 139. See also Northern Wiscon- sin. New York, settlers from, 37, 52, 54, 57-64, 69, 78; farm lands in, 30, 62-63; statistics of settlers from, 47-48; pioneer days in, 65; wheat growing, 84; influence on dairy progress, 154-155. New York Board of Agriculture, Reports, 155. Newton, John W., dairyman, 153. Newton, in Manitowoe County, 54; wheat growing in, 94. Niagara limestone, location, 3-5. Nikima, in Fond du Lae County, 54. North Carolina, settlers from, 48. North Dakota, Wisconsin people in, 139. Northern Wisconsin, oak openings in, 131; agricultural conditions, 133-134; wheat growing in, 95. See also New North and Old North. Northern Wisconsin Agricultural Association, Transactions, 147. Norway, in Racine County, 50-51, 54; wool growing in, 125. Norwegians, in Wisconsin, 47, 50- 51, 79, 141, 145. Oak Grove, cheese factory at, 156. Oak trees, areas of, 13, 16-17; open- ings described, 17; location, 18; advantages of, 85. Oats, as incidental crop, 85; in- creased production of, 97; range, 100-101; table of production, 102. Ohio, settlers from, 47-49, 58, 63, 69; improved land in 1850, 87; wheat growing in, 84; surplus dairy products, 154. Okee, horse prizes for, 120. Old Lutherans, in Wisconsin, 52. Old North, area defined, 136; popu- lation statistics, 136-137. See also Northern Wisconsin. Oneida County (N. Y.) forested area in, 141; dairymen, 155. Ontario County (N. Y.), dairymen in, 155. Openings. See Oak trees and Prai- ries. Oshkosh, settlement, 40; wheat crop in, 93; headquarters of Northern Wisconsin Agricultural Associa- tion, 147. INDEX 207 Ottawa (Ill.), Norwegians at, 50. Ottawa (Wis.), in Waukesha Coun- ty, 54. Outagamie County, forested area, 13; oak openings in, 131; soil of, 144; wheat growing in, 136. Owen, Robert Dale, communist, 57. Owenite community, in Wisconsin, 57. Ozaukee County, forested area, 13, 17, 38, 40; foreign born in, 52- 53; grain production in, 102. Panic of 1837, effect on settlement, 31. Paper towns, in early Wisconsin, 40. Paris (Kenosha Co.), dairy prod- ucts, 151. Pekatonica River, topography of, 12. Peneplain, in Wisconsin, 6. Pennsylvania, settlers from, 47-48, 52, 58, 69; improved land in 1850, 87; wheat growing in, 84. Penokee Range, location, 2. Pepin County, forested area, 17; soil of, 144; wheat growing in, 136. Percheron, breed of horses, 120. Pheil, Richard, horse breeder, 119. Philipp, Emanuel, birthplace, 50. Phillips, Laura J., “Colonization of Wisconsin by the Welsh,” 54. Pickard, Josiah L., school superin- tendent, 80. Pierce County, geology of, 5; for- ested area, 17; soil of, 144; wheat growing in, 136. Pigs. See Hogs. Pike River, lands on, 35-36. Pine trees, areas of, 13, 16-17, 19, 21-22, 68, 131; durability of stumps, 143. Pineries, effect on settlement, 21; on Lake Michigan, 68; on inland rivers, 68; work in, 130; illustra- tion, 132. See also Lumbering. Pink eye, horse disease, 90. Pishtaka River. See Fox River of the Illinois. Pittsfield (Mass.), county fairs originate in, 113. Platteville, mining town, 26. Pleasant Prairie (Kenosha Co.), dairy products, 151-152. Pleasant Springs, in Dane County, 51, 94; wheat crops in, 93. Plymouth, census figures, 37, 54; wheat crops in, 94. Polk County, forested area, 17; soil of, 144; farm in, 175. Population. See Wisconsin. Pork, marketing, 107, 110. See also Hogs. ¥ Portage, fort at, 12, 74; foreign born, 54. Portage County, topography, 3; driftless area of, 10; population in 1860, 134. Potawatomi Indians, in Wisconsin, is Powers, D. J., cited, 69. Prairie du Chien, road to, 12, 74; early settlement, 23, 27; railroad to, 91. Prairie du Sae, settled, 41. Prairies, in southern Wisconsin, 12, 18-19, 21-22, 35; maps of, 14-15; origin of, 13; importance of, 139; breaking of, 91. Price, P. A., dairyman, 153. Primrose, wheat growing in, 94. Quatre, M. M., aid acknowledged, at; Racing, lake port, 32-33, 69; pio- neer, 55; lumber for, 68; road to, 76, 79; wheat market, 85. Racine Argus, cited, 32. Racine County, forested area, 13; prairies in, 18; farm lands, 31; improved land in 1850, 86; early settlements, 32-37, 77; towns in, 43; density of population, 44; 208 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK native born in, 47-48; foreign born in, 50, 54-56; houses in, 67; grain production, 95, 99-100; livestock, 103, 116; dairying, 152. Railways, importance of, 41-42, 63, 78-79; laborers for, 51; building of, 91. Randall (Kenosha Co.), dairy prod- uets of, 152. Randolph, in Columbia County, 54. Reaping machines, 88. Red Cedar River, lumbering on, 132. Red Cedar valley, survey in, 135. Rhinelander, center of immigration activity, 140. Rib Hill, location, 2. Richards, Griffith, Welsh settler, 54- 55; horse prizes for, 121; por- toni 52. Richaraa) Richard, stock breeder, 55, 115-116; horse breeder, 119; prizes, 120-121; portrait, 125. Richland County, in driftless area, 10; forested area, 17; settlements in, 42, 79; native born in, 47; foreign born, 49. Ridge fields, described, 12; wheat grown on, 94. Ripon, on edge of prairie, 18. Ripon College, candidate for agri- cultural college grant, 159. Roads, on ridge lands, 12, 73; mili- tary, 12, 18, 41, 74, 79; in mining region, 26; Chicago-Green Bay, 35, 74, 77; conditions of, 73-76; plank, 76, 79. Robbins, J. V., dairyman, 153. Roberts, William G., wheat grower, 93. Rochester (N. Y.), Norwegians at, 50. Rochester (Wis.), settlement, 32; road to, 79; wool market, 125. Rock County, geology of, 5; prairies in, 18; settlements, 33, 37; towns in, 43-44; roads, 76; native born in, 47-48; foreign born, 50, 54- - 56; improved land in 1850, 86; grain production, 99, 102; rank in several grains, 95, 100. Rock Prairie, location, 18; early wheat crop on, 85. Rock River, transportation via, 31- 32; settlements on, 33, 36, 40, 80; nore from, 41; ican on, 74. Roe, John P., exhibitor, 115; owner of shorthorns, 116. Rosendale, in Fond du Lae County, 54. Rural churches, conditions of ae perity, 171-172. Rural New Yorker, farm journal, 155. Rural population, increase of, 181; in New North, 146. Rural schools, influence of, 173- 174; in northern Wisconsin, 148. Rush Lake, settlement on, 38. Russell, Harry L., bacteriological tests, 160. Rutland County (Vt.), farms in, 59. Rye, region of production, 102. St. Crorx County, geology, 5; prairie in, 19; soil of, 144; grain production in, 95, 100, 136-137. St. Croix valley, survey in, 135; lumbering in, 132. St. Louis, lead mine metropolis, 26, 32. St. Peter sandstone, location, 5, 10- a i Salem (Kenosha Co.), dairy prod- uets, 152. Sauk County, driftless area of, 10; forested area, 17; settlements in, 42, 79; foreign born, 50, 53; grain production, 100, 102; dairy- ing, 153. Sauk Indians, in Wisconsin, 1. Sausage grinder, illustration, 169. Sawmills. See Mills. Saxony, emigrants from, 53. INDEX 209 Scandinavians, in Wisconsin, 47, 50-51. Schoolhouses, in Wisconsin, 80; il- lustration, 73. School lands. See Lands. Sehools. See Rural schools. Scotch, in Wisconsin, 46, 50, 55-57. Scott, in Columbia County, 54. Self binders. See Binders. Shawano County, forested area, 141. Sheboygan, lumber port, 67; saw- mill at, 68. Sheboygan County, forested area, 13, 17, 40, 68; density of popula- tion, 44; foreign born in, 52-53, 57; grain production in, 100, 102. Sheboygan Falls, population changes, 178. Sheep, increased production of, 97; derivation of early flocks, 107, 123; entries at first state fair, 113; breeds, 114; distribution, 103; purebreds, 124; numbers, 107, 124; decline of raising, 126; illustration, 117. See also Wool. Sherman, in Sheboygan County, 52. Shire, breed of horses, 120. Shorthorn, breed of cattle, 113, 115; source of, 114; prices, 117; breeding of, 116. Shot tower, on Wisconsin River, 41. Showerman, Grant, A Country Chronicle, 177. Shull, Jesse W., pioneer miner, 26. Shullsburg, mining town, 26. Silo, a French invention, 158; in- crease of, 158. Simmons, James, Annals of Lake Geneva, 73. Singing schools, community affairs, 174-175. Sioux Indians, in Wisconsin, 1. Six Nations Indians, in Wisconsin, ik Smith, Hiram, dairyman, 155. Smith, Leonard S., The Water Pow- ers of Wisconsin, 22. Soils, character of, 21; in northern Wisconsin, 143. Somers (Kenosha Co.), dairy prod- ucts, 151-152. Sorghum, production of, 109-110; effect of Civil War on, 110; de- cline of, 110; occasional revival, Eick, South Dakota, Wisconsin people in, 139. Southdowns, importations of, 113. Spanish, in the lead mines, 24. Speculation, in Wisconsin lands, 30- 31. “Spring house,” illustration, 151. Spring Prairie (Kenosha County), settled, 33; dairying in, 157. Springvale, in Columbia County, 54. Stage routes, in Wisconsin, 80. Starin, Frederick J., diary, 65, 67, C7. State Agricultural Society. See Wisconsin State Agricultural So- ciety. State Board of Immigration. See Immigration. Stavangar (Norway), emigration from, 50. Stevens Point, topography of, 3, 8. Stilson, Eli, wheat grower, 93. Stock breeding, beginnings of, 55, 71. See also Cattle, Hogs, Horses, and Sheep. Storekeepers, bought dairy prod- ucts, 149; social function of, 177. Stoughton, location, 18; horse prizes for, 120. Stumping. See Lands. Sub-earth vault, for curing cheese, 158. Suburban farmers, 177-178. Suffolk, breed of swine, 113; illus- tration, 124. Sugar Creek, in Walworth County, 54; wheat raising in, 94; sheep, 124. 210 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Sun Prairie, on edge of prairie, 18; pioneers at, 69-70. Sunday, working customs, 170-171. Superior, population, 144. Superior Lake, as a boundary, 1; lumbering near, 44; soils, 144; agriculture near, 144. Surveys, in Wisconsin, 27-30; in northern Wisconsin, 134-135; for railways, 42. Susquehanna River, transportation on, 59. Swamps. See Marsh land. Swedes, in Wisconsin, 47, 51, 145. “Swigert,” thoroughbred horse, 120; illustration, 125. Swine. See Hogs. Swiss, in Wisconsin, 47, 49-50, 53- 54; as dairymen, 163. TAVERNS, in Wisconsin, 80; illus- tration, 73. Tennessee, settlers from, 47; wheat growing in, 84. Thomas, L. G., early cheese maker, 155. Thompson, John Giffin, Growing, 81, 95-96. Threshing, changes in method of, 89. Thwaites, Reuben G., Wisconsin, 23, 26; “Notes on Early Lead Mining,” 26. Tobacco, cultivation of, 109. Tourists, in northern Wisconsin, 148. Towns, technical definition, xi, 42; surveyed, 27; Domesday Book studies of, 167. Trails. See Roads. Transportation, by inland water- ways, 21, 32, 41, 58-59, 61; rail- ways, 41-42; in pioneer days, 73- 76. Trempealeau County, in driftless area, 10; prairie in, 19; soil of, 144; grain production in, 95, 100, 136. Wheat Trempealeau valley, surveyed, 135. Trimble, William, “Historical As- pects of Surplus Food Produe- tion,” 82. Tripp, Dr. James, at Whitewater, 72. Troy (N. Y.), as a market, 59. Troy Lake, settlements near, 33. Tuttle, A. G., letter of, 130. Two Rivers, sawmill at, 68. Unitep States Geological Survey, charts, 33. Utley, William L., horse breeder, 119. VANDERPOEL, Abram, letter, 32. Vermont, settlers from, 37, 47-48, 58-64, 78; agriculture in, 59-62; pioneer days in, 65; sheep from, 114. Vernon County, geology of, 5; in driftless area, 10; prairie in, 18; grain production, 100. Verwyst, C. A., “Reminiscences of a Pioneer Missionary,” 57. Virginia, settlers from, 47-48; wheat growing in, 84. WALNUT trees, in Wisconsin, 17. Walworth County, prairies in, 18; farm lands, 31; settlements, 33, 37, 67; towns, 43; native born, 48-49; foreign born, 49, 56; houses in, 67; roads in, 76; grain production, 95, 99-100, 102; dairy- ing in, 152; sheep raising, 102, 124. Warren, Emory F., Sketches of the History of Chautauque County, 62. Washington County, forested area, 40; roads in, 76; foreign born, 37-38, 47, 53; grain production, 102. Water power, in Wisconsin, 21; effect on settlement, 30; need for mill operation, 72. INDEX Watertown, settlement, 40; foreign born in, 54; market days at, 157. Watson, Elkanah, originator of county fairs, 113; portrait, 106. Waukesha County, forested area, 13, 40; farm lands in, 30; settle- ments, 33, 36, 79; towns in, 43; foreign born, 50-51, 53-57; houses, 67; grain production, 100, 102; sheep raising, 103. Waunakee, on edge of prairie, 18. Waupaca County, geology, 3; soil of, 144; oak openings, 131; wheat raising, 136. Waushara County, topography of, 3; foreign born in, 54; soil of, 144; wheat raising in, 144. acheter, Daniel, buys Wisconsin land, 30. Weish, in Wisconsin, 46, 49-50, 54- 56. West Indies, market for wheat, 82. Western states, supphed export wheat, 84. Wheat, favorable locations for, 12, 91, 93; production of, 81-96; acreages, 85; harvesting, 87; prices, 85, 90; average consump- tion, 81; crops, 1837, 84-85; 1839, 81; 1849, 82; 1860, 92; crop fail- ures, 90, 92; decline of produc- tion, 97; table of production, 102; marketing, 36, 41, 68, 80-82, 89- 90; foreign exports, 82. Wheatland (Kenosha Co.), Guiry, products, 152. Wheeler, R. M., owner of “Ham- bletonian,” 114. Whitbeck, Ray H., monographs, 22. White, W. C., Kenosha dairyman, 151. Whitehall canal, 59. Whitewater, settled, 33, 37, 67; for- eign born in, 51, 167; lumber for, 67-68; goods, 69; gristmill at, 72- 73; land breaking, 77; road to, (N. Y.), terminus of ) 211 79; sheep in, 124; first house in, 67. Whitney, Daniel, pioneer merchant, 41; lumberman, 132. Wilcox, William, home of, 67. Wilder, C. H., cited, 154. Willard, Josiah F., cited, 42. Williams, Charles H., stock breeder, 55; exhibitor, 116. Winnebago County, forested area, 13; foreign born in, 52, 54, 57; grain production, 100. Winnebago Indians, in Wisconsin, a Winnebago Lake, forests on, 17; prairies, 18, 77; towns on, 41, 43. Winslow, John B., Story of a Great Court, 73. Wisconsin, physiography, population in 1850, 48; settlements, 23-44; immigrants, 45-64; pioneer days in, 65-80. See also New North, Northern Wisconsin, and Old North. Wisconsin Dairymen’s Association, organized, 157. Wisconsin Domesday Book, 167. Wisconsin Farmer and Northwest- ern Cultivator, begun, 107, 111; purpose, 108; editors, 107-108; effect of agricultural journals, 109. Wisconsin Geological Survey, aid acknowledged, 2, 4, 9, 14-16, 20; bulletins, 22, 24. Wisconsin River, topography of, 3, 5, 8; as a boundary, 17, 42; ero- sion of, 10-11; towns on, 41, 79; lumbering on, 44, 68, 130, 132; trail to, 74. Wisconsin State Agricultural So- ciety, organized, 104-106; reports summarized, 105-106; secretary, 108; Transactions, 42, 69, 114, 137. Wisconsin State Board of Immigra- tion. See Immigration. 1-22; early 212 WISCONSIN DOMESDAY BOOK Wisconsin State Horticultural So- ciety, organized, 165. Wisconsin State Land Office, ma- terials in, 30. Wisconsin University. See College of Agriculture. Wolf River, pinery on, 130. Wood, J. T., Baraboo exhibitor, 118. Wood County, topography of, 3; driftless area of, 10. Wool, production of, 97, 122-126; market for, 123. See also Sheep. “Worm” fence, illustration, 169. Wyocena, in Columbia County, 54. YORKSHIRE, breed of swine, 113. Yorkshire (England), emigrants from, 49. Zinc, mines of, 24. Git eal i) RELIEF MAP OF T 1 ‘) N ‘ | N W | S ( wr o Ss i, ACCOMPANYING “A History of Agriculture in Wisconsin” BY JOSEPH SCHAFER REPRODUCED FROM AMODEL PREPARED BY W. 0. HOTCHKISS AND PF. 'T. THWAITES AND MODELLED BY EH. J. LORENZ, IN 1910 eae iar Saar | ] Ss bye ar fs See, \v rt Za 4 7 | y P > 4 bs. IN WISCONSIN < ~y/ wanamns “SS N ELEVATION OF IMPORTANT POINTS sia ° Z Anowe PROMINENT HILLS Rib Hill, Marathon Co. (highest In state! Petenwell Peak, Juneeu Uderty Pole Hill, Grnen Observatory Hill, Marquette Co Necedah Moved, Juneau Co. RIVERS Missitsippi, south line of state, near 0 west line of state, a Wisconsin, Mouth, near Prairie du Chien Source, near Lac Views Desert Black, Mouth Bleck River Falls Hattield Bridge Near Neilisvitie Chipoews Falls Mouth of Fuambeny Bruce ~ & BEB2SE2 23: ; : 2 2 : wees a: 3 : . ON ] $s LO | | 03 220 60 ——— —_—_—_—_—_—_—