A HISTORY OF THE BIRDS OF EUROPE, NOT OBSERYEI) IN THE BRITISH ISEES. BY CHARLES ROBERT BREE, ESQ., M.D. VOL. HI. L 0 N D 0 N : VKOOVBEIDGE AND SONS, PATEKNOSTEK ROW. SI DCCC LXII. A I 9&Z. V.3 RB S'X. CONTENTS OF THE THIRD VOLUME. PAGE. Sombre Tit ........ 1 Siberian Tit . 6 Azure Tit ........ 10 Penduline Tit ....... 13 Black-headed Bunting ...... 24 Marsh Bunting ....... 29 Pine Bunting ....... . 35 Cretzschmaer’s Bunting ..... 40 Striolated Bunting ' . . 44 Meadow Bunting ...... 47 Rustic Bunting ....... . 53 Yellow- breasted Bunting ..... 60 Yellow-browed Bunting . . ' . . 63 Little Bunting ....... 65 Scarlet Bullfinch ....... 69 Rosy Bullfinch ....... Desert Trumpeter Bullfinch ..... . 81 Crimson-winged Grosbeak .... 95 Serin Finch ....... 98 Citril Finch ....... 106 Snow Finch ....... . 110 Alpine Serin Finch ...... 115 CONTEXTS. Holboll’s Eedpole .... I'AGF.. . 117 l\ock Simrrow ..... 120 Italian House Sparrow . 128 Spanish Sparrow .... 131 Grey "Woodpecker .... . 136 White-rumped Woodpecker 142 Middle Spotted Woodpecker . 146 Dalmatian Nuthatch .... 151 Wall Creeper ..... . 158 Elue- cheeked Bee- eater 162 Black-and-White Kingfisher . . 166 Oriental Chimney Swallow 170 Bufous Swallow ..... . 174 Crag Swallow ..... 184 Basset-necked Nightjar . 188 Egyptian Turtle Dove 195 Hazel Grouse ..... . 203 Willow Grouse .... 212 Pin-tailed Sand Grouse . 221 Sand Grouse ..... 226 Caucasian Snow Partridge . 232 Francolin ..... 236 Greek Partridge ..... . 242 BIEDS OF EUROPE, NOT OBSERVED IN THE BRITISH ISLES. GRANIV'OR.E. Family PARID^. ( Bonaimrte.) Genus Parus. ( Linnams.) Generic Characters. — Beak short, straight, strong, conical, and compressed; edges sharp and pointed, the base furnished ■with a few stiff hairs; nostrils basal, round, and covered with reflected bristly feathers. Feet short, with three toes in front and one behind, entirely divided to their origin; hind toe the strongest, and armed with a long hooked claw. Wings, the first primary very short, the second much shorter than the third, the fourth, fifth, and sixth about equal in length, and the longest in the wing. SOMI3RE TIT. J*ar>(s luyuhris. Parus luguhris. Ratteres. Temminck. Bonaparte, 1838. ScniNz. Schlegel. Kaup. Bonaparte, 1850. Pcecilia lugul)ris, Jlesange luguhre, Trauermeise, Of the French. Of the Germans \'(yL. in. o SOMBRE TIT. Specific Characters. — Top of the head, nape, and throat brownish black, separated by a broad white band extending from the gape to the nape, and increasing in width from before backwards. Length five inches and three-tenths; carpus to tip of wing three inches; tail two inches and a half; beak from gape three-fifths of an incli; tarsus nine-tenths of an inch. The Tits are a very wcll-inarkccl family. In dispo- sition of colours, in form, and habit, they very much resemble each other, in whatever part of the world they are found; and yet almost every species is, by some author or other, placed in a separate genus. Thus in the present family we have the original genus of Linnteus, Parus ; then we have Leach separating those with long tails into the genus M.ecistura, and those with a beard into that of Calamophilm. Xot satisfied Avith this innoA’ation, Boie calls the last genus Mystacinus , and Vigors places the Little Penduline Titmouse, which 1 shall figure and describe by and bye, in the genus .^yithalus ; AAdiile Brehm places the same bird in a genus created for its especial use, that of Pendulinus. Then we find that great innovator, Kaup, placing the Crested Tit in the genus Lopliojihanes , and the Marsh, Sombre, and Siberian Tits in the genus Pmcilia, while for the Azure Tit he creates the genus Cyanistes, in all of AApich he is followed by Bonaparte. This uncertainty arises no doubt from the different conceptions by naturalists of what really constitutes a genus. As I believe, with Agassiz, that genera are natural groups of a peculiar kind, separated from each other by ultimate details of structure, I shall consider the family of Tits as coming within this definition, and therefore as belonging to one genus only. It is re- markable how modern naturalists have lost sight of the thoughts, by Avhich (it is clear, as pointed out by SOMBRE TIT. 3 Agassiz,) our old classifiers were influenced in the formation of orders and genera; the consequence of this is that every few years we have a new nomen- clature, founded on the assumption that the previous one was based upon erroneous data. Upon this all-important subject the reader will find some excellent and judicious remarks in a paper by Mr. Stimpson, quoted from Silliman’s “Journal,” in the “Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal” for October, 1860. I will only here make one extract: — “The res- toration by G. P. Gray, of Boddaert’s names in ornithology is another instance. By the discovery of a meagre pamphlet of the eighteenth century, only two or three cojiies of which now exist, we find ourselves forced to change the generic names of common birds, familiar as they are by long and constant usage.” I shall have another opportunity, more appropriate than this, of enlarging upon this subject, in which I shall be able to shew that the Prince of Canino has changed the generic name of some birds twice or even three times, without in any case adding either precision or utility to the science. I sincerely hope that British ornithologists at least, will do all in their power to put an end to a system which merely encumbers our literature with useless verbiage. The Sombre Tit is an inhabitant of Dalmatia, Hungary, Greece, and Pussia. According to De Selys, it also occurs in Switzerland. Temrninck says that it is never found in Austria, or in fact in any part of Germany. In the distribution of colours about the head and neck this bird is very similar to Parus Sihiricus, with which it has been indeed considered identical by Keyserling and Blasius, without, however, I think. 4 SOMRRE TIT. either due consideration, or comparison of specimens. P. lugubris is altogether a larger bird, tlie beak and tarsi are stronger and larger; and while the abdomen is Avhite and the back grey brown in lugubris, the former is russet, and the latter mottled with russet and black in Sibiricus. A reference to the two figures will render this quite clear. Temminck says it is easy to confound the Sombre Tit with the Nonette or Marsh Tit; but it is quite certain that he referred to the Parus atricapillus of Gmelin, which is a North American bird, altogether differing from our well-known Marsh Tit, with which the present species can in no way be confounded. Count Miihle, who has recorded the occurrence and detailed the habits of this bird in Greece, says that its habits are different from the other members of the family. It arrives in the IMorea, where it appears to be a summer visitor, at the end of April or beginning of May, and locates itself in the little mountain valleys, where it lives solitarily, frequenting the wild-fruit trees, and never being found upon the more lofty ones. Each bird takes up its own territory, and is observed on the same resting-place frequently during the day. 'i-'hey are very unsociable and shy on the appearance of man, and seem to know if they are followed, and consequently are difficult to shoot. Count Miihle did not observe them after September, and was altogether unacquainted with their nidification, the only egg he procured being an imperfect and uncoloured one which was found in a female shot in the spring. The adult male in breeding plumage has the top of the head and throat dark blackish brown, the rest of the upper plumage bright hair brown; cheeks, chest, abdomen, and under tail coverts white, with the 1. S 0 M B a E T J T. 2. SIBERIAN TIT. >1 SOMBllE TIT. 5 flanks mottled with bluish black; the white patch on the cheeks extends to the upper scapularies. Beak, feet, and iris, brown. My figure is taken from an adult male kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram. The figure of the egg is taken from Thienemann. The bird is also figured by Michahelles, in Sturm, Deutschlands Fauna, heft. 2, tab. 1 ; Gould, Birds of Europe, pi. 151, fig. 1. GKANlVOllvE. Family FAlilDJE. ( Bonaparte.) Genus Paiius. ( lAnnceua.) SIIffiRIAN Tl^r Paras Siblricas. Pants Sibiricus, Peecilia Sihirica, Gmelin and Authors. Kaup. Bonaparte. Oe the French. Of the Germans. IMesange de Siberie, Sibirische Meise, Specific Characters. — Tliroat black; top of bead brown; cbest and abdomen russet. Length four inches and nine-tenths; carpus to tip two inches and a half; tail two inches and a half; beak two-fifths of an inch; tarsus three-fifths of an inch. The Siberian Tit, as its name implies, is a northern species, being found only in the boreal regions of Europe and Asia, visiting, during winter, some of the provinces of Russia. It also inhabits Lapland, where it was discovered nesting by the late much lamented John Wolley. According to this gentleman it is the only species which breeds in the Muonioniska district of Finnish Lapland. In his catalogue for 1858, four eggs are inserted as having been obtained at Mokhajerri, from a nest made with the hairs of mice. Mr. Wolley remarks that P. borealis is seldom seen in Lapland, SIBERIAN TIT. i and that he doubts if it ever breeds in the far north. In the catalogue for 1860 five eggs are inserted, taken also in Finnish Lapland. It is also included in the Scandinavian Fauna by jN’illson. M. Linden, the con- servator of the Museum of Geneva, states that this bird is also found in the Swiss Alps; but M. De Selys- Longchanips is of opinion that he mistook P. lucjuhris for it. I am indebted to Mr. Newton for the following in- teresting details of this bird: — ^‘My own opportunities of observing Parus Sibiricus were not sufficient to enable me to say in what particulars (if in any) its habits differ from those of the other species of the genus with which I am acquainted, beyond the fact that its call-notes are easily recognisable as distinct from anything else. Indeed from the information I have at various times received from the late Mr. John Wolley, I should suppose that in manners it closely resembles the rest of the Titmice. It is resident throughout the year in the district around Muonioniska, and as he has often assured me, was the only species which he found to breed there, although in autumn the Marsh Titmouse makes its appearance, and on one occasion, a solitary Great Titmouse was obtained by him. I am unable to give even an outline of the range of Parus Sibiricus in Lapland; but I do not remember seeing it until, in descending the river Muonio, we had entered the region of the Scotch fir, f Pinus sylcestris.) I never found a nest myself, or saw one m situ. It breeds in holes of trees, whether naturally formed by decay, or excavated by Woodpeckers. The nest is a mass of hair, principally from the lem- ming, or some of the voles, but occasionally from the alpine hare, mixed with a little green moss, black 8 siiJEKiAX rir. fibrous lichen, and willow down. (Seven appears to be the usual complement of eggs, but eight, and even nine are sometimes laid. This Titmouse seems to pay as little regard to the rights of priority as some orni- thologists do, for several instances occurred to Mr. Wolley’s knowledge, of its dispossessing the Common Redstart from a convenient hole in which the latter bird had begun its nest. The ordinary cry of Parus Sihiricus is perhaps best expressed by the words ‘Pistee-tee,’ pronounced in a hissing tone, and from this cry the bird gets its Finnish name. By those of the people who are inclined to superstition it is re- garded as a bird of bad omen, and the squirrel-shooter or bear -hunter looks forward to a luckless expedition if in starting in the morning, he is greeted by the notes of the busy little Pistee-tianen. Specimens of the Marsh Titmouse from the north of Europe undoubtedly differ somewhat (as is the case with so many other species) from those obtained in the British Islands, by having the colours more strongly contrasted. The northern race has been described by M. De Selys-Longchamps, as distinct, under the name of Pams horealis, (Bulletins de 1’ Acad. Roy. de Bruxelles, tome x. No. 7). I have, thanks to that gentleman, lately had the advantage of comparing his type specimens with examples from Mr. Wolley’s col- lection, and can safely say that they are in all respects identical. At the same time I must express my belief that the differences between them and our common P. palustris are not such as I can consider specific; and if I am not mistaken, M. -De’ Selys himself is now of the same opinion. I feel assured that that talented naturalist was wrongly informed as to the locality whence his types were obtained. It was doubtless from SIBERIAN TIT. 9 some part of tlie Scandinavian continent, and not from Iceland, where no Titmouse is found, that they were brought by the French Northern Scientific Exhibition.” The adult male in breeding plumage has the top of the head and nape dusky brown ; the back and upper wing coverts russet brown, mottled with black. AFings and tail dark hair brown. The throat is black, and between it and the top of the head is a broad patch of pure white, extending from the gape to the scapularies, and increasing in width from before back- wards. All the rest of the under parts are russet, lighter on the crop, and verging into grey where it joins the black of the throat. Wings and tail under- neath slate brown; beak black; feet lead grey; iris dark brown. The female is rather smaller than the male, having the top of the head and throat of a greyish brown tinged with russet. The young before the first moult are much less russet-coloured above, and of a brown tint, the black feathers of the throat being bordered with grey. I am indebted for the male specimen figured to the kindness of Mr. Tristram. The egg is from a specimen kindly sent me by Mr. Alfred Newton, and its authenticity, I need not say, may be entirely relied upon. The Siberian Tit has also been figured by Temminck and Laugier, in the Atlas to the Manual, with the remark of the author, that the russet colour of the flanks is deficient, and that of the abdomen and inferior coverts too deep. The tail ought to have been a trifle longer, and more tapering. Buffon, pi. enlum 708, fig. 3; Gould, Birds of Europe, pi. 151, fig. 2. VOL. in. c 10 GRANIVOBJE. Family P ARID^. ( Bonajyao'te.J Genus Parus. f Linnceus.) AZURE TIT. Parus cyanus. Pants cyaniis, (( (t “ cyaneus, “ ccsruleus major, “ scelyensis, “ krjcesciolc, tC (i Cyanistes cyanus, ][Iesange azuree, La Grosse Mesange lleue, Lasurmeise, Pallas; Nov. Comm. Acad. Peterop., V. 14, p. 588, pi. 23, fig. 3. Gmelin. Temiiinck. SCHLEGEL. FalcK; Vog., T. 3, p. 407, pi. 31. Beisson. Spaemm; Mus. Carl., pi. 25. Gmelin; Syst. Latham; Ind., v. 2, p. 572. Lepech; Voy., vol. i, p. 180. Kaup. Bonapaete. Of the Peench. Of the Geemans. Specific Characiers. — All tlie inferior parts pure vliite, ■with a brilliant blue patch on the middle of the abdomen. Length five inches and a half. The Azure Tit, perhaps the most beautiful of the European Paridce, is an inhabitant of the north of Europe and Asia. It is very common in Siberia and the I AZURE TIT. 11 adjacent parts of the Russian dominions, extending in winter through the greatest part of European Russia, being found at St. Petersburg, as well as on the banks of the Wolga, and sometimes ranging from thence into Poland and Prussia. According to<* Naumann, it is more frequently found in Sweden than in the north of Germany. An occasional specimen may he sometimes found in Saxony, or even in Austria, but it does not occur further to the south or west. In the beginning of autumn it migrates into warmer latitudes, as in winter or early spring, an occasional pair, or single bird only, will be found in the north- west. Naumann, who is almost the only author from whom we can glean anything about the habits of this bird, says that it does not appear to aftect trees with pointed leaves, like the fir or pine, preferring willow bushes in meadows by the side of rivers and watery places. In winter they are found more plentifully in the neighbourhood of houses, and come even into towns. It is a lively, agile, and fearless bird, like the rest of its tribe, very skilful in climbing, and is seen, like the Blue Tit, clinging to boughs and branches. It is, however, readily distinguished from the other allied Tits by its longer tail. Bechstein compares its call-note to that of the House Sparrow, hut it is softer. It lives on insects and their eggs, larva3, and pupae, which it diligently picks out from the open crevices of bark, and to get at which, like the Blue Tit, it destroys many buds, blossoms, and leaves. It is also fond of seeds and the kernels of nuts, upon which it may be seen hammering with its beak, having carefully fixed the object in a chink of the tree. 12 AZURE TIT. Naumann says that it never nests in Germany; in fact very little is known about its propagation, and I am sorry that I have not an authentic egg to figure. It breeds in the wild regions of Siberia and Eastern Russia. t The adult male has the top of the head, a large patch on the nape, the cheeks, throat, and all the inferior parts snowy white, the top of the head being- shaded with azure blue, and there is a patch of the same in the middle of the abdomen. From the beak through the eyes to the nape is a band of very dark blue, which, passing round the head, enlarges at the nape, returns and forms a triangular patch on the side of the neck; back, rump, and above the wings, azure blue; greater wing coverts dark blue, the border being clearer, and terminating in white ; middle tail quills azure blue, the laterals bordered and terminated with white. The tail long and cuneiform; feet and tarsi azure blue. The female has the top of the head grey white; all the blue colours less pure, and the blue band which passes through the eyes is smaller in the nape. Figured by Temminck and Laugier; Pallas, Nov. Comm. Acad. Peterop, pi. 2o, fig. 3; Naumann, Vogel Deutsch., vol. iv, pi. 95; Gould, pi. 153. P E N D U L 1 N a TIT. 10 O GRANIVOPv^. Familif FAllIDJE. ( Bonaparte.) Genus Parus. ( Linnceus.) PENDULINE TIT. Parus pendulinus. Parus pendulinus, Linnjeus. Temminck et Atjct. “ 7iarhonensis, Qun.,) Gmelin. Latham. ^githalus pendulinus, VioOES. Bonapaete. “ “ Eetseeling and Blasius. Mesange Pemiz, La Penduline, La Udesange de Languedoc, Of the Fbench. Gemeine beutelmeise, Of the Geemans. Specific Characters, — Vertex and tliroat white; forehead black, edged with ochreous ; cheeks black ; back rich deep russet. Length four inches and one-fifth; carpus to tip two inches and one-tenth; beak from gape two-fifths of an inch; tarsus three-fifths of an inch; tail two inches. The Penduline Tit is an inhabitant of Poland, Italy, Russia, Hungary, the Crimea, and France. It is also found in some parts of Germany. Degland says he has received the nests and eggs from the neighbourhood of Pezenas; that it is found in Provence only during its migration, and accidentally in Lorraine and in the de- partment of the Seine-Inferieure. ]M. Hardy has also VOL. nr. D 14 PENDULINE TIT. obtained it in tbe neighbourbood of Dieppe. To these localities Nauinann adds, Dalmatia, Scandinavia, and Siberia; while Count Miible tells us that it is not rarely found in tbe swamps of Rumelia and the Morea. The Penduline Tit is not only one of tbe most prettily coloured among the family, but it is altogether a most in- teresting and remarkable bird. Its nest is a very elaborate structure; and all ornithologists from tbe time of Aldrovandi, two hundred and seventy years ago, have been eloquent and minute in their descriptions of this singular domicile, and of its ingenious and skilful ar- chitects. • A good deal of difference is, however, to be found among theh descriptions, and I have therefore thought better to give at length the history of the process, as well as some of the most interesting points in the bird’s economy, from two recent observers, one of whom, it will be perceived, accounts for the discrepancy in the descriptions of former naturalists. In the ''‘Revue et Magasin de Zoologie,” for 1859, No. 3, we have the following account by M. Moquin- Tandon : — “The Remitz or Penduline, called by various authors Mesange de Pologne or de Narhonne, and by others Mesange des sanies or des marais, is without doubt one of the most remarkable of European birds. This bird displays a wonderful industry in the construction of its nest; no other species in France or Europe forms anything so elaborate and curious. The nest of the Remitz is not cup-shaped like that of most birds, but is closed at the top more or less ovoid, and in the form of a bag or purse ; on the side near the top is a small round entrance, which is pro- longed into a conico -cylindrical passage, either placed I'E^'DULINE TIT. 15 horizontally or obliquely from top to bottom. It is in some respects like tbat of tbe Long-tailed Tit, but it is more delicately and skilfully built, and it is particu- larly distinguished from it by the manner in which it is suspended. This nest does not rest upon the branches or trunk of the tree; it is quite free, and always sus- pended from the upper part of the flexible branches of aspens, willows, tamarisks, and other trees or shrubs which grow on the borders of rivers or marshes. This is why some ornithologists call the Lemitz, Penduline, ( Parus nidum suspendens.) When the nest of the Pemitz is turned on one side, with the opening above, it resembles somewhat a woollen sock both in shape and material; so much so, that the peasants in the neighbourhood of Nimes have given the bird the name of Dehassayre, (stocking-weaver.) This little architectural chef -d’ -oeuvre is more or less length- ened according to the age and other circumstances of the bird. The most ordinary form is that of a bag- pipe, of which the pipe has been shortened. M. Requien, of Avignon, sent me from the neighbour- hood of his native town a nest of this form, which is very characteristic. It was taken on the borders of the Phone, suspended to the bough of a young aspen, by a rather long and narrow cord. It had the following dimensions: — Height seventeen cents.; transverse diameter eleven cents; length of lobby three cents, and a half; diameter of opening three cents.; thickness of edges fonr millemetres. It weighed fifty-five grammes. Sometimes the lobby does not exist, and the nest then takes the figure of a wallet, an egg, or a pear, nearly like that of the Long-tailed Tit. The nest is attached and suspended with fibres of hemp, flax, nettles, stalks of grasses, and even with little 16 PENUULINE TIT, pieces of wool and tlie roots of coucli-grass. The length of the susjiending rope varies very much, INI, Schintz has figured one, which was brought to me, in 1823, from the environs of St, Gilles, (Gard,) by General dc Fregeville, It was suspended to an old aspen on the borders of the lesser Rhone, by a cord four centimetres and a half long, Guettard has figured two nests of the Penduline, the cords of both being finished by a sort of buckle which surrounds a small branch, I have never seen this sort of fastening. Those I have observed were always twisted round a bending branch, while both assisted in sup- porting it as well as constituted a part of its structure. Thus suspended by a flexible cord, this pretty little cradle is gently rocked above the surface of the river or marsh, where the insects upon which the Remitz feed are found in abundance. The opening of the nest always faces the marsh or river near which it is built. The nest is composed of tufts of thistles, dandelions, viper grass, but above all the light and silken down which surrounds the catkins of willows and poplars. There is also found in it horse-hair and other animal materials, but only when vegetable substances are scarce. I had a nest from the neighbourhood of Pezenas, which was almost entirely composed of sheep’s wool, and which had consequently a very strong smell of the grease of that animal. Having brought together the materials necessary for its nest, the Remitz interlaces them, felts them, gums them together, and thus produces a sort of thick cloth, very close and firm. (It is in fact a real cloth or felt.) This tissue is strengthened with the narrow leaves of grasses, fibres, and rootlets, which sometimes stick out of the exterior. Thus the frame-work is made. One PENDULINE TIT. IT of tlie nests figui-cd by Guettarcl has little bits of straw sticking out, of wbicli the greater part are worked into the texture. The Tits now arrange at the bottom of the nest a small couch formed of down, feathers, and other very soft materials. The colour of the nest is generally greyish or whitishf according to the material of which it is made. Aldrovandi and Thienemann have described nests with two openings, one before and one behind; but in all the nests I have received I have only noticed one entrance. We have seen that the edifice of the Remitz is suspended from above; the bird first makes the cord, which he twists round a fiexible branch. This cord, which is more or less long and thick, is divided into two parts, one of which goes into one side of the nest, the other into the other, and it is easy to observe how this cord will make at first two openings, one before and one behind, and one of which, as the nest advances, the bh'ds shut up, and complete the other into a pretty little door. The Remitz is not often seen in the north or centre of France, but frequently in the southern departments, and above all on the shores of the Rhone, Durance, Garden Herault, and Lez. The male and female work together, and take eighteen or twenty days to complete the nest. This activity is surprising when the perfection of the work is compared with the size and feebleness of the bh’ds. The Remitz lays four or five eggs, rarely six or seven. They are like those of the House Swallow, but smaller. They are rather elongated; the shell slender and dull. When just laid they are of an ivory white, and a pure white when blown. Great diameter fifteen millemetres, small diameter ten millemetres ; weight when empty 18 PENDULTNE TIT. six centigrammes. Bechstein and Temminck made a mistake when they described small reddish spots as distributed over the shell, like the eggs of the other Tits. The female lays twice in the year, — in April or May, and again in July or August.” The following interesting description of the nidification of the Penduline Titmouse given by M. Taezanowski, of Warsaw, is also taken from the “Bevue et Magasin de Zoologie” No. 6, 1859: — ‘^Having had an opportunity of seeing a great number of the nests of the Bemitz, and of making a collection of those variously constructed, I have been able to as- certain the way in which they are built, and to correct some mistakes which have hitherto existed, from the imperfect observations which have been made upon them. The materials which form the foundation of these nests are the fibres of hemp, nettles, and long and slender filaments of the bark of different species of willows, which the Bemitz separates in great quantity from those plants when they are dry. It attaches these materials upon a single flexible branch above its fork. When it has sufficient material it begins the real substance of its nest, which is composed of the down of the catkins of the willow and poplar, and is placed helow the fork of the branch above mentioned. It first forms an out- line of the nest, about three centimetres wide, into which it introduces at least one twig of the tree into each side of the nest. When this outline is sufficiently long, it takes the ends of the filaments and joins them together, so as to form the bottom of the nest. It now lines the two sides of the nest with down, proceeding from the bottom to the top, until it has succeeded in forming a nest which has two openings. Then it lines PENDULINE TIT. 19 tlie centre of tire nest with softest cloAvn of the willow, and then closes np one of the openings. It strengthens the outside with a greater quantity of willow-down, to which it often adds tufts of sedge, reeds, and thistles, and then diminishes the other opening, and forms a projecting conduit or passage. It uses no animal pro- duction in this construction, which takes about four weeks to complete. This is the real form of these nests, all those with two openings being imperfect constructions, and the error has been perpetuated in consequence of the female commencing to lay eggs before the nest is completed, in which both male and female assiduously engage. If the process of sitting commences before the nest is finished, the work is carried on by the male alone. There are very few places in the kingdom of Poland where the Pemitz builds. The locality is generally some large pond covered with rushes and bushes, situ- ated on the right hand shore of the Vistula, and in the vast wooded marshes found in the neighbouring country of Paleria — the low and marshy part of Minsk, Volhynia and Grodno. There are a few which nest on the shores of the Vistula, but none have been found on the left side of the river. The nest is placed on difierent species of poplar, willow, and alder, situated from one to fifteen metres or more above the ground; lowest on the osiers, and highest on the poplars. They are not always suspended over the water; more frequently over the ground, but always in places surrounded by water. I have never found them in thickets, but in spots more or less open. In the thick osier grounds they are only found at the edges of the openings and glades. The nest is very easy to find when building, or when the brood is young, for then the parents are always at hand, and give 20 PEXDULINE TIT. warning of tlie approach of danger by a slight prolonged whistling, (sifRcnient.) When the female sits, the male often goes away and gives no warning, hut as soon as the nest is taken he appears, perches himself on the place it once occupied, and never ceases to bewail its loss.” Count Miihle remarks that in Greece it is very diffi- cult to get specimens of the Penduline Tit, because it lives and breeds in impenetrable swampy woods, sur- rounded by grass land also frequently under water. He found the nests frequently in the winter empty, when the trees were leafless. The male bird in breeding plumage has the top of the head and throat white, frequently verging into grey, which extends to the nape and scapularies. The back and wing coverts rich russet, becoming lighter towards the rump. Forehead black, edged with deep ochreous; cheeks and ear coverts black ; neck and crop light russet, spotted with the same deep rich ochreous colour of the back; the rest of the abdomen light fawn-colour, the flanks darker; primaries clay brown; secondaries same colour, slightly tipped with white ; tertials brown, deeply bordered with greyish white, tinged with russet; tail of moderate length and emarginate, the feathers all more or less brown, bordered with greyish white ; beak black ; feet and legs lead grey; iris yellow. The female has the top of the head grey, and the black of the forehead is wanting, but there is a spot of ochreous brown just above the base of the beak; the inferior parts are of a deeper fawn-colour than those of the male, and the brown of the wings and tail feathers is lighter, and the grey border not so broad. The young before the first moult has the black parts of the forehead, cheeks, and ear coverts replaced by PENDULINE TIT. :2l russet; the oclireoiis colour of the back is less deep than in the adult; the under parts of the body are of a light red. My figure of this bird and its egg are from specimens kindly sent me by the Hev. H. Tristram. The nest is after Gould. It has also been figured by Buffbn, pi. enl. 618, fig. 3, and 708, the young before the first moult under the name oi Mesange de Languedoc; P. Poux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 124, fig. 1, adult male; fig. 2, head of young; Bou- teil, Ornith. du Dauph., pi. ol, fig. 6; Gould, B. of E., pi. 159; Naumann, Vogel. Deutsch, vol. 4, pi. 97, male, female, young, and nest; Temminck, Atlas; Vieillot, Faun. Franc., pi. 50, fig. 2 and 3; Albin, vol. 3, pi. 57; Bechstein, Naturg. Dent., vol. 3, pi. 38, fig. 2; Meyer, Vog. Dent., part 10. There are one or two other ParidtB, which require a short notice. Parus Carolimnsis cristatus, Brisson; P. hicolor, Lin- nasus and authors, was figured by Gould, pi. 152, Birds of Europe. It has however been omitted by Schlegel and Bonaparte from the European list, and is admitted with doubt by Degland. Mr. Gould now thinks that it ought to be erased, in which opinion he is joined by all the best modern ornithologists. Parus horealis, Selys; Poecilia borealis, Bonaparte. — Mr. Newton’s valuable remarks about this species in the notice of the Siberian Tit, in the last number, are I think sufficiently strong to warrant my excluding it from the European list as a distinct species. It is so closely allied to our Marsh Tit, f P. palustris,) that it can only at the most lay claim to be considered a permanent YOL. III. PEJNDULIXE TIT. variety or race of that species. I have, however, been favoured by Mr. Wheelwright, of Gadsjo, near Carlstadt, in Sweden, with some remarks about this bird, which I will insert. Mr. W., who has had many opportunities of observing this and others of our most interesting European species, writes to mo, — ‘^It so much resembles our IMarsh Tit, both in habit and appearance, that I really think it can hardly be called a separate species. There are, however, the fol- lowing differences, which are constant: — Head glossy silk black; cheeks and sides of the neck white, rather tinged with black ; back blackish grey brown. The edge of the outer web of wing feathers a little paler than the back. Borealis. — Head walnut dull black; cheeks and sides of the neck clear white; back grey. The edge of the outer web of wing feathers nearly clear white. In Borealis the tail is longer and different in con- struction. The outer tail feather is about two and a half or three lines longer than the middle one, which is nearly as long as the longest in the tail. The outer feather is considerably shorter than the other. In Palustris, on the contrary, the outer tail feathers are generally of the same length as the middle ones, and always only about a line shorter than the longest in the tail. Nilsson is of opinion that the species are distinct, and Kjterbolling agrees with him. If I remember right the British Marsh Tit always builds its nest with moss, etc. Now the nest of our P. borealis is always built of the fine under bark of the dead alder tree. That of the Crested and Blue Tit of moss, and sometimes feathers. P. borealis is very common in the south of Sweden, PEXDULINE TIT. 2S and only accidental in Denmark. They say Palustris goes as far north as the birch grows. It is, however, certainly very rare here, for all I kill are Borealis. The further north we go after passing Gefa, the less common it becomes, being replaced by P. sihiricus, which is very rarely killed south of Stockholm. P. ctjanus, according to Nilsson, is only found in the north of Sweden.” P. hockhariensis , Brehm, is said to be occasionally seen in the north of Europe ; but I believe there is no good authority for its introduction into the European list. 24 GIIAXIVORtE. Family FFINGILLIDFB. f Bonaparte. ) Genus Embekiza. (Linnceus.) Generic Characters. — Eeak short, strong, conical, compressed, and sharp-pointed; the edges of both mandibles curved in- wards, with the commissure more or less oblique; the upper mandible narrower than the inferior one, and internally in the palate, or roof, there is a bony and projecting tubercle. Nostrils basal, round, and partly hidden by small feathers in front. Feet with three toes in front and one behind, the front ones entirely divided; the hinder toe carries a claw*, short and curved; in front the claws are rather long, curved, and strong. The wings with the first primary slightly shorter than the second and third, which are the longest in the wing. Tail forked or slightly rounded. BLACK-HEADED BUNTING. Emheriza melanocepliala. Emheriza melanocepliala, (C (6 Tanagra melanictura, Xanthormus Caucasicus, Frhigilla crocea, iEiispxza melanocepliala, Uruant- Crocote, Sclmarzlcopfiger Ammer, Zlgolo Capinero, JBlach-lieaded Bunting, ScopoLi, 1768. Gmeltn. Latham. Temminck. Cuvier. Keyserling et Blasius. ScHINZ. ScHLEGEL. DeGLANH. Guldenstedt. Pallas. ViEILLOT. Bonaparte. Of the French. Of the Germans. Of Savi. Latham, nec Bewick, vel Yarrell. B I A C K - 11 E A D E D BUNTING. BLACK-IIEADKD BUNTING. 25 Specific Characters. — Tlie first primary equal in length, to the second, and slightly longer than the third; primaries and tail liglit brown, the latter without any white markings. Back and rump rich russet, tinged with yellow. Length six inches and a half; from carpus to tip three inches and three-quarters; tail three inches; beak from gape seven-tenths of an inch; tarsus nine-tenths of an inch. The Buntings are’ a very natural group, and easily distinguished, by their peculiar characters, from the rest of the family. They live in fields, woods, gardens, road-sides, or banks of rivers and marsKes. They feed upon farinaceous seeds and insects. The sexes are always distinctly marked, the males having the most vivid coloration. The young resemble the females, except in having duller colours, and being more spotted. Temminck says none of the European species moult more than once, while the exotic species do so regu- larly, the colours of the male changing considerably, having in summer, very brilliant colours, but in winter the quiet and modest plumage of the female. Degland remarks, — “The greater number, independently of the usual moult which takes place towards the end of summer, have also in spring a change in coloration. This change is occasioned by the under part of the plumage, which is always the most brilliantly-coloured, being in the spring uncovered by the rubbing away of the edges of the feathers, which are of a duller tint.” The Buntings nest on the ground, on banks, or among grass, in bushes, shrubs, or reeds. Those species which have the hind toe long and straight have been separated by Meyer, under the generic term Plectropltayies. The others form a very closely-allied and distinct family, notAvithstanding which Kaup has divided the genus into eight. ^0 P. L A C K - ] I F, A D K 1 ) BUNTING. Of tlie European species different authors vary in the number which they assign to that fauna. Temininck, in the last edition of his “Manual,” describes sixteen species, which is the number also given by Schlcgel. Degland adopts this list, with the exception of one addition, E. borealis. Bonaparte gives nineteen species, in five different genera. On the whole I think the list of Schlegel best represents the European members of this genus. Of these, five, and both the species of Plectrophanes , are found in the British Isles. The name “Black -headed Bunting” has been unfor- tunately given by modern English authors to our well-known bird the “Reed Bunting.” As, however, the subject of this notice can lay claim to a much older title, and as I do not feel justified in creating a new one, I hope English ornithologists will use the name “Reed Bunting,” first given, I believe, by Pen- nant, to our British species. The Black -headed Bunting is an inhabitant of the southern parts of Europe and Asia Minor. It inhabits the Caucasus, and is very common in Georgia, about Tiflis, and in Greece, and is not rare in Dalmatia, where it has the name of Ortolan, though a very different bird from that which bears this name in France. It is common throughout the Levant, and is sufficiently so, according to Temininck, in Istria, in the neighbourhood of Trieste, in the bushes and slopes of the hills, which border the Adriatic. It has been occasionally, but accidentally found in Lombardy, Provence, Saxony, and in Germany, in the neighbourhood of Vienna. It sings very agreeably, preferring to perch on some post in the open country. It nests upon shrubs, particularly, according to BLACK-HEADED BUXTING. 27 Deglaiid, on Bariurus aculeatus, and not far from the ground. It lays from four to five whitish eggs, which are covered with very small spots and dots of a more or less ashy grey; some specimens are of a greenish white, with spots of a rust brown at the largest end.” In a long and interesting letter, full of valuable information, which I have received from Dr. Leith Adams, from Malta, I extract the following remarks about the bird I am now noticing: — “Euspiza melano- cepliala, Bonaparte, is almost the prototype of E. simillima of Blythe; the latter authority fixes on the following as distinctions. The closed wing of simillima is three inches and a quarter, instead of four inches, and altogether it is not so large a bird. The species frequents southern India, and until Mr. Blythe made the above diagnosis, Indian authors considered it iden- tical with E. melanocephala. I have seen three speci- mens, and could not make out any decided distinctions. Might not climate account for the smaller size?” Count Miihle says “It comes (into Greece) at the end of April, and I have for many years observed its arrival. On a clear bright morning in spring the hedges near the coast are often covered with them, though previously none were to be seen. It builds and breeds on the overgrown hills, and goes away early in August. During the breeding time the male sits on the tops of the bushes, and lets its agreeable simple. Yellow-hammer-like song be continually heard. It is very stupid, and not at all shy; indeed it is frequently killed, by those in quest of it, with a stick alone. It is at the same time strange that the female is so seldom seen. I have only met with a very small number. M^hen they first arrive the male Ixas the rust-reel pluinage of tlie head in abundance, hut this is by degrees rubhed of.” Brehm, in Biideker’s work upon European eggs, says, ^‘Very little is known about the nidification of this bird. Its eggs, of which it lays five, arc very similar to those of the other Buntings. One variety is like that of the Snow Bunting. They are of a blue greenish ground, delicately marked with dark and reddish grey spots, mostly at the larger end. In form they are a loaigish oval, and the shell very soft and brittle.” This very beautifully-marked bird has the breeding plumage of the male as follows: — -Head, nape, and auditory regions deep black. The whole of the back, scapularies, and upper wing coverts rich dark russet, tinged with yellow; chin and all the inferior parts ♦ bright citron yellow. Wings and tail brown; the primaries lightly edged with grey. Beak bluish grey; feet yellowish brown. The female, according to Temminck, has all the upper parts of a russet grey; the throat white; inferior parts reddish white; under tail coverts yellow; greater wing coverts and the first primaries bordered with reddish grey, having their centres black. ]My figures of this bird and its egg are taken from specimens kindly sent me by Mr, Tristram. They are from Greece. The egg is from a nest of four taken by W. H. Simpson, Esq., at Missolonghi, January 3, 1859. The bird has also been figured by Temminck in his Atlas; Boux, Ornith. Prov. ; Giildenstedt, Nov. Com.; Naumann, Naturg. Neue Ausg., pi. 101, f. 2; Gonld, Birds of Europe, pi. 172. Four figures of the egg are given in Biideker’s illustrations of European eggs. GPvANIVOE^. Famihj FRINGILLIDuE. ( Bonaparte.) Genus Emberiza. f LinncBUS.) MARSH BUNTING. Emberiza palustris. Emberiza palustris, “ pyrrhuloides, “ Caspia, SchcBiiicula pyrrhidoides, Bruant des Marais, Sumpfammer, Passera di padule, Savi. Bonapaete. Temminck. SCHINZ. SCHLEGEL. Pallas. Meneteies. Bonapaete. Of the Feench. Of the Gteemans. Savi. Specific Characters. — Beak short, thick, and strong, the upper mandible curved; as broad at the base as long. Bump grey, and marked vith brown; under tail coverts white; primaries slightly bordered with russet, the first being shorter than the fourth. Length of a young male sent) me by Mr. Gould, seven inches; from carpus to tip three inches and a fifth; beak three- tenths of an inch; tarsus one inch. The jMarsli Bunting is an inhabitant of the south of Europe, being found especially in the south of France, Italy, and Sicily. It was at first described as a distinct species by Savi, in his “Ornitologia Toscana.” Temminck doubted whether it was distinct from E. sclimiiculus , in any- VOL. III. 30 ^rAKSTI liUNTTNO, thin" except the sliortness, stoutness, and eonvex'ity of the beak, and in tlic "reater distinctness and brilliancy of the colouring, llonaparte, on the contrary, not only admits the ]\Iarsh Hunting as a distinct sjiccics, but adds another, whiclr is said to be intermediate in character between tliis and schcenicAilus, under the name of S. intermedia, the E. intermedia of Michahclles, the E. canneti of Brehm; and he places the three in a new genus, that of Schccnicola. Ihoux also denies that the Marsh can ever be confounded with the Reed Bunting; and Degland adds several points of distinction to those given by Tcmminck, which I have incorporated after verification in my specific diagnosis. Dcgland thinks that Tcmminck did not know the true E. jxilustris, but that the specimens upon which he as- sumed its identification with E. scliceniculus were, in fact, larger specimens of this latter species. In a note which I have just received from Professor Blasius, of Brunswick, that distinguished naturalist places this bird as a variety of E. schceniculus. Such being the difference of opinion about the specific distinctness of this bird, let us hear what Savi himself says about it. I copy the following from his “Ornitologia Toscana,” tome secondo, p. d2: — “The Zigolo of which I speak has been for some time in the hands of ornithologists. The Bunting, of which there is a drawing in the ‘Storia degli Uccelli,’ under the name of 3Iigliarino di Padulc, is clearly recognised by the form of its beak, as belonging to this species. In the Museum of Turin, and in that of the Jardin des Plantes at Paris, it is preserved as a variety of Emheriza schceniculus. Signor Dott: Pajola sent it to me last year from Venice, describing it as a new species. I had long fancied it was distinct, but as MARSH BUNTING. 31 on examination of the distribution of colour, the pro- portions of its quill feathers, etc., I did not find any characters to distinguish it from the other species, and knowing then nothing of its habits, I had never made it known as new, and, to avoid making a mistake, T placed it in the iNIuseum of Pisa as E. palustris. Since then, however, having been able to make some new observations upon the form and habits of the two species, I am persuaded they are decidedly different, and the principal reasons which induce me to form this opinion are the following : — The distinctive characteristics of E. palustris and E. schceniculiis are the greater size of the former, its head larger in proportion to the rest of the body, its tarsi proportionally shorter and thicker, its upper plumage more distinct in coloration, and its beak differing in form and size. Xow as these characteristics only consist in a greater development of parts, and a stronger degree of colour, it may be objected that this is owing to difference in age; that is to say, that the Migliarino cli Padule in growing old may acquire the proportions and colours of the Passera di Padule. As far as size and colour are concerned, there would be no difficulty in under- standing this, but it is not so easy to account for the difference in the beak, and almost impossible to conceive such a change in the form and dimensions of the masticatory organs, and such an alteration in the other hones of the face and skull, in the adult age of animals, in whom the consolidation of bone rapidly occurs. But that I might have positive proof, I kept several Peed Buntings in my house for about a year, and as I had supposed no change in the form or dimensions of the beak occurred. Besides this, MAKSII liUN'riXG. tlie liabits of tlie two birds prove them to bo of different species. E. ncJicenicAilus lives among bushes, and always remains on ground far from water, feeding upon seeds; while E. is always found estab- lished near water, climbing up the reeds, and feeding on the muddy banks of ponds. Then the two species are never found mixed together in the same flock. I have killed as many as ten in the same flock without finding one schceniculus, and, what is worthy of note, without in such a number finding one with the beak of the same size and form as in that bird, which would naturally have been the case, had they been varieties of the same species.” At page S26 of the third volume, we have also the following interesting account of the habits of this bird: — ‘‘The Black -headed Bunting is found in Tuscany during the summer, inhabiting watery places covered with reeds. A great number hatch in the marshes of Castiglione, so that in crossing the intricate passages made by the fishermen cutting the reeds, which rise so high as to exclude all but a small portion of sky, the low moaning of the wind is uninterrupted, except by the distant voice of the Tarabugio, (Bittern,) which sounds shrill • over the dead water, or the continual croaking of the Passcra di Padide, which then remains obstinately hidden. It has a voice similar to the Rena esculenta, (frog,) but it is even more sonorous.” Count Miihle, in his “Bcitraege zur Ornithologie Griechlands,” says, “ Emheriza pyrrlmloidcs is considered to be a distinct species from E. schceniculus . All the proportions are larger and stronger, the head much thicker and longer, the beak peculiarly arched, unlike that of any other species, the colouring of the plumage is much brighter, and in broader masses, the black on 1. MARSH E’JisTiNG. 2. MEADOW BUR TING. 3. RUSTIC BUNTING. 4 & 5. YELLOY/-H BAD ED BUNTlNi^. MARSH nUXTINO. the head and breast much deeper. It breeds in the impenetrable reed beds, coming Avhen they are green. When the swamps are swollen it is not to be got at, but later it arrives on the borders of these s^vamps, and then it is to be discovered by its contrast with the blood-colour of the club reed. It is very lively; the male clings to the joints of reeds, and utters, like Salicar'ia turdoides, its crisp song. It is not so plen- tiful as E. schceniculus , and goes away earlier.” Enough has, I think, been said to prove the sj^ecific distinction of this bird. Of its nidification Degland tells us: — “,It nests on the edges of marshes, among rushes, between the roots of aquatic plants. Its nest is composed exteriorly of the filaments of vegetables, dry plants, and is lined with horse-hair. Its eggs, in number from four to five, are of a dull white, dis- tinctly marbled with brown, (according to Tcmminck,) or (according to Crespon) of a white, shaded into greyish, and marked with a multitude of small brown spots, most numerous at the larger end.” “In manners and habits the Marsh Bunting differs but little from the Heed Bunting. Its note, according to Crespon, is briefer and stronger. The same author remarks that it breaks the stems of the reeds to eat the pith, and that it also feeds on insects.” The following is Savi’s description: — The male in breeding plumage has the beak thick, compressed laterally, curved above and below, obtuse at the point, and of a black colour. It rather resembles a Sparrow’s beak, but is shorter. Head, neck, throat, and middle part of breast black; there is a large white band be- ginning at the angle of the beak, and uniting itself with the white of the flanks and abdomen. Scajjularies black, broadly margined with fulvous chesnut; the rest u MARSH RUNTING. of the upper feathers ashy black, margined with chesuLit. Flanks and abdomen white; upon the hanks longitudinal spots of obscure black. Primaries black, margined with chesnut, the lesser wing coverts having a broader margin of fulvous chesnut; under wing coverts white. The first tail feather white, with a large black wedge-shaped spot on the inner web at the base, and a smaller one at the tip ; the second tail feather black, with a white wedge-shaped spot at the tip on the inner side; the other tail feathers black; the two middle feathers edged with brownish yellow. Feet rather robust, and obscurely black; claws black. In autumn the adult male has the feathers of the head, throat, neck, and middle jjart of chest black, shaded off to the point. The white feathers of the neck become so shaded towards the tip, as almost t obscure the white. All the upper feathers have a bay margin, more extended, terminating in brownish yellow. The female has the vertex, sides of the head, and neck of an obscure chesnut colour, with black spots; nape, back, and wings dark brown; a brown band on the checks terminates near the car, the region of which is covered by a nearly black spot; throat and neck white, shaded with russet; from the angle of inferior mandible there is a mottled black band extending to the chest; chest and flanks white, shaded with russet, and covered with long obscure spots. ]\Iy figure is that of a young male, kindly sent me by IMr. Gould. This bird has also been figured by Stor, Uccelli Tav., 006, (a good figure of male;) by Roux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 114, male in autumn, fig. 2, head of female; Ch. Bonaparte, Faun. Itah, pi. 35, f. 1, male in spring, f. 2, female, f. 3, young; Gould, B. of E., pi. 184. i PINE BUNTING. GRAXIVOILE. Family FRINGILLIDJE. (Bonaparte.) Genus Embeuiza. ( Linnceus.) PINE BUNTING. Emheriza pityornis. Emheriza pityornis, a a “ scotata, Passer esclavonicus, Emheriza Bonapartii, Bruant a couronne lactee, Fichtenammer, Pallas. Iter, 1776. Gmelin, Syst., 1788. Latham; lud., 1790, et Syn., iii, p. 203, et p. 256, (as Dalmatian Sparrow.) Temminck; Man., 2nd. ed., 1820. Bonaparte; Birds, 1838. Ketserling et Blasius; Die Wirbelt: 1840. ScHiNZ ; Eur. Faun. 1840. ScHLEGEL; Eevue, 1844. Bonaparte; Eevue et Mag. de Zool., April, 1857. Brisson, 1760. Degland, 1849. Barthelemy. Of the French. Of the Germans. Specific Characters. — Bump, throat, and cheeks dark russet; top of the head, and distal half of the two lateral tail feathers white; the first four primaries of equal length. Length seven inches: carpus to tip three inches and a half; tail three inches and a half; beak from gape half an inch, breadth at base three- twentieths of an inch; tarsus four-fifths of an inch. 36 PINK 1!TNT1N(;. 'I'liE Pino Pnntino’ is an inhabitant of Siberia, rangino^ thence to Turkey, being found occasionally on the shores of the Caspian Sea, Temminck says it is found during the winter in Hungary and Bohemia, and ac- cidentally in Austria and the Illyrian provinces. Its real home is in the north and west of Asia, its occurrence in eastern Europe being considered accidental by most of our modern ornithologists. That it has, however, a real claim to a place in the European fauna, seems, I think, settled by the paper of Prince C. Bonaparte, in the ^‘Bevue et Magasin de Zoologie” for April, 1857, in which he describes a young male which was killed in the neighbourhood of Brescia, in Lombardy, and sent to him by M. Parzadaki, under the name of Emheriza scotata. This bird is described in the above paper under the name of Buscarla pity- ornis, and figured in the same number of the “Bevue” as Emheriza scotata. Count Miihle says that he has often seen the female and young in Boumelia in the early autnmn. Naumann (“^‘Naturgeschichte der Vogel Deutschlands”) says the Pine Bunting is found in Siberia, where, from the Ural Mountains to the Biver Lena it is very common. “It also comes into the southern provinces of European Bussia, into Turkey in winter, and, rarely, into Bohe- mia, but is never found in the middle or north of Germany. It loves rocky places, but not the mountains themselves, frequenting more the valleys between them. There it must be sought for near the water, on the banks of brooks, rivers, and lakes, where it lives among the sedges and low bushes. It derives its name from the pine woods of Siberia. It remains only a short time in the woods, like the Beed Bunting in our timber woods.” FIXE BUXTTXG. 37 The Pine Bunting is a cheerful lively bird, with a note similar to the other members of its family. In its habits, it resembles the Heed Bunting. It feeds on insects, and seeds of some of the mountain plants, and probably also on those of the reed and other water plants; in winter on oats, millet, etc. Of its nidification I am sorry to say I can add nothing. The male has the top of the head white, bordered with black, which is also the colour of the forehead; a band extending from the base of the beak beneath the eyes, a demi collar round the front of the neck, the centre of the abdomen, the distal half of each lateral tail feather, and under wing and tail coverts, white. Scapularies and upper wing coverts chesnut brown, with longitudinal patches of black; rump russet; tail above dark broAvn. Primaries dark brown, edged externally with white; tertials dark brown, deeply bor- dered Avith russet ; cheeks and throat deep chesnut ; crop and flanks mottled Avith same colour of a lighter tint; wings and tail below broAAm; beak brown above, yelloAvish beneath; tarsi yellow; iris brown. In the female, according to Degland, the Avhite mark on the top of the head is only slightly indicated; there is no russet on the thi*oat; the upper parts are of a broAvn russet, inferior Avhitish; wings and tail as in the male. The young male is thus described by Prince Charles Bonaparte, in the “Hevue et Magasin de Zoologie” for April, 1857 : — “The top of the head, the auditory region, and the shoulders, bright bay; the feathers on the top of the head blackish in the middle, and the ears are edged with the same colour in an undecided manner. The large superciliary feathers and the moustache, Avhich are spread out at the end, and so VOT.. ITT. G 38 riNE BUNTING. nearly unitiiig as to form almost a circle round the entire cheek, are of a whitish colour, slightly tinted with an isahelle rose; immediately below the beak proceeds, as if to extend itself to the beginning of the chest, a long pyriform band of an elegant orange rose- colour, which is rarely seen in nature, and which is 'of the same tint as the Antlius riifigtilaris ; this band is completely surrounded by a black border, which is sjiread out on the sides of the neck; the upper part of the neck and the rump are of a nearly jnire ash- colour ; the back is variegated with black, bay-coloured, and whitish spots; the under parts are whitish, with large .brownish longitudinal wedge-shaped spots; the lesser and greater wing coverts are, as well as the ter- tiary feathers, black, with red and white external edges; the primaries, of which the first is about the same size as the fifth, arc brown, unicolorous, with a slight edging of white at the tip. The tail is slightly notched ; the two middle feathers, short and very pointed, are black along the shaft, and the first is edged with reddish grey, the two following on each side arc quite black, and the two external feathers have a large white cuncifoian spot, much more extended upon the last feather, of which the very narrow outer plumes arc white, and which has ashy brown grey on the shaft, and a large spot on the tip.” “It is well known that this Emheriza is also the E. passevina, Messerschniitd ; E. albida, Blyth; E. leuco- cephala et Dahnatica, Gmelin, and Sclavonica, Dcgland. It is probably an older species which M. Barthelemy, of Pomerania, has called after me, E. Bonapartii.” My figure is from a specimen kindly, sent me by Mr. Gould. It has also been figured by S. G. Gmelin, Nov. Comm. PTXE BUNTING. 39 Acad, Petrop., pi. 23, fig-, 3; Lej)echm, Ibid, pi. 25, fig. 2; Gould, B. of E. pi. 104; Bonajiarte, in Bovue de Zoologic, for April, 1857, fyoung male.) 40 GRANIVOEtE. Famihj FRINGILLIDjE. (Bonaparte.) Genus Emberiza. ( Linnceus.) CliETZSCHMAER’S BUNTING. Fmheriza ccesia. Fmheriza ccesia, Ceetzschmaee; in Euppell’s Atlas, (Vogel,) pi. 10, B. (( it 66 66 Temminck, 1835. Ketsebling et Blasius; Bio Wirbelt: 1840, ScHiNZ; Europ. Faun., 1840. ScHLEGEL; Eevue, 1844. Degland; 1819. “ liortulanus, Fringillaria ccesia, JBruant cendrillard, Graulcoffiger Ammer, Blasius; in Lit. Bonapaete; Consp. Av. Eur., 1850. Of the Feench. Or THE Geemans. Specific Characters.- —Beak brown above, reddish below; rump russet grey; head, nape, and crop slate grey. First three pri- maries of nearly equal length, and considerably longer than the fourth. Primaries fringed ou their outer web with russet grey. Length five inches and three-quarters; carpus to tip three inches and three-teuths ; beak two-fifths of an inch; tail three inches; tarsus seveu-tenths of an inch. Ceetzschmaer’s Blinting, so called from tire name of its first artist in Euppell’s Atlas of the birds oh- CRETZSCH1v;aEE,’3 bunting. ciietzschmaer’s buxtixg. 41 served in the North African journey of that distinguished naturalist^ is found in the south of Europe, and is a regular summer visitant into Greece, appearing there, according to Count Miihle, early in April, and leaving in August. Its principal home is in Syria, Nubia, and Egypt. Temminck suggests that it would probably be found more common in the south of Europ)e, but that its similarity to E. da causes it to be frequently mistaken for that bird. Its capture near Vienna, in 1827, is also recorded by this naturalist, and M. Eoux states that it is found in Provence, in company with E. da. It has also been killed in the neigh- bourhood of Marseilles by M. Busonnier, as recorded by Degland. Count Miihle says that it is the most common Bunting in Greece. ‘‘After its arrival in April it is found in flocks among the wild and rocky hills of the country, in company with S. stapazina, Sarnia noctua, and Tardus cyanus. It is seldom found in fields or among bushes. It hops among the rocks with great agility, and its song is much more refined than that of the Ortolan. This bird (the Ortolan) first appears plentifully when E. ccesia has been gone some time, and is never found in the same localities, preferring bushy fields.” “E. ccesia builds its nest, which is like that of the Yellowhammer, but smaller, behind blocks of stone in a sage plant, off the ground. It lays four to six eggs, which are grey blue, sprinkled with liver-coloured sj)ots. It feeds its young with ground beetles and the caterpillars which it finds among the flowers of the sage.” Of this bird in Palestine Mr. Tristram remarks, (Ibis, vol. i, p. 34): — “One of the most common birds of the C ]l ETZSCl I M A K ll’s ]{ U N r I XG . more' fertile districts of Talestinc. I’erclied on the topmost bough of a shrub or tree, it continues its monotonous song through the day, and is to be seen on almost every bush. In its habits and actions it is very dif- ferent from its Algerian congener, Emheriza Saharce, which it so nearly resembles in form and plumage, avoiding buildings, and not, as hir as I am aware, perching on stones or walls. Its nest is placed near the ground, in a low bush.” As there is a considerable difference in the above two descriptions, I wrote to Mr. Tristram, who oblig- ingly forwarded me the following explanation: — “I can only account for the discrepancy in the two histories, by the difference in the time of year. I was only in the Morea in winter, and in the north of Greece late in the spring, and I did not observe E. ccesia, so far as I recollect; but neither did I notice it in Palestine in the corn-fields, where we saw the Ortolan consorting with the Common Bunting and the Larks, but in the hill country of Judaea. It abounds in the olive-clad valleys and ravines to the west of Jerusalem, and I was struck by its habit of always perching on the bushes and shrubs, both on the uncultivated hills and about gardens. Probably when Count Miihle saw them they had not paired; when I fell in Avith them they were building. E. ccesia is, I should say, the commonest Bunting in Palestine.” Professor Blasius, of BrunsAvick, in a private letter to me, places E. ccesia as a variety of E. hortulanus. The adult male in breeding plumage has the top of the head and a broad collar round the neck bluish grey ; all the upper parts from the nape varied Avith dark brown and russet; throat, chest, and abdomen russet; primaries and tail feathers dark brown, bordered CRETZSCIT^rAEK’s lU'NTlA'G. 43 with russet; two outer tail feathers with a large Avhite patch on the inner web of their distal extremities; beak, tarsi, and feet reddish brown. The female has, according to Degland, all the upper parts varied with brown and russet, having a strong resemblance to the female Ortolan in breeding attire; the inferior parts and under tail coverts russet, with brown striae on the crop and chest. Teimninck says that the male and female in autumn have the colours less pure, with small striae on the grey of head and neck; the feathers of the crop boi’- dered with brown, and the russet red of the throat less pure. ^ly figure and description are taken from a male specimen kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram, marked “Emniaus, Judaea, March 25th., 1858.” It has also been figured by Doux, as a variety of the iNIeadow Bunting, in his Ornith. Prov. Atlas, pi. 112, (male;) by Cretzschmaer, in Buppell’s Atlas, pi. 10, fig. 6, (male in breeding plumage;) and by Gould, B. of E., pi. 181. 44 OllANTYORyE. Fumthj FRINGILLIDvF. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Emijeriza. ( Linnceus.) STRIOLATED BUNTING. Emheriza striolata. Emherha striolata, <( (( Frin [/ill aria striolata, (( (C Fruant Striole, Gestreifter Ammer, RurPELL; Atlas, (Vogel,) pi. 10, a. Temminck; Man., p. 640, 1820. Ketseeling et Blasius; Die Wirbelt: 1840. ScniEGEL, 1844. Degland, 1849. Lichtenstein; Cat. des doub. du Cabinet de Berlin, 1823. Bonapaete; Consp Av. Europ. 1850. Of the Eeench, Or the Geemans. Specific Characters. — No white mark on either of the two outside tail feathers. Bump and outer edge of primaries russet; first and fourth primaries of equal length, and shorter than the second and third, fifth shorter than first or second. Length five inches and a half; carpus to tip three inches; beak two-fifths of an inch; tarsus three-fifths of an inch; tail two inches and three-quarters. The Striolated Bunting, one of the smallest in the family, is an inhabitant, of Africa. It was found by Ituppell in Egypt, and figured in his Atlas by S T K. ^ G A B u 3 G -Gr I N G. STRIOLATED BUNTING. 45 Cretzscliiuaer. Its European localities are Spain, in tlie Andalusian provinces of which country it is said by Teinininck to be common. Bonaparte gives Lusi- tania as a locality. In the “Revue de Zoologie,” for March, 1857, it is placed by M. De Selys-Long’champs in the list of those birds admitted into the European fauna without sufficient authority. Temminck, however, says of it, — “Inhabits Andalusia, where it is sufficiently common, and perhaps also in other parts of southern Europe, which is the more probable since E. ccesia has been found in Greece, where it is very plentiful. The Strio- lated Bunting is found in winter on the coast of Bar- bary, and has been brought from Egypt by Ehrenherg and Riippell; it also appears in winter in the neigh- bourhood of Abukol and Schendi. It lives among the bushes.” On the whole, I only admit this bird into my work provisionally, and as a doubtful European species, for whose accidental appearance we are more indebted to the proximity of the Spanish and African frontiers, than to any indigenous claim it can set up. If it should wander, however, and become settled in Europe, I hope that its likeness may he recognised from the figure which I give, and which is taken from a male specimen sent me by Mr. Tristram, marked “Nubia.” The adult male has the head, the cheeks, nape, and breast of a jmre slate grey, marked with longitudinal spots of black; above the eyes, and from the angle of the jaw, and base of lower mandible proceed three white bands ; scapularies, wing coverts, and rump lively russet red; primaries and outer tail feathers dark brown, edged with russet; middle tail feathers entirely dark brown; abdomen, flanks, and under wing coverts light AOL. III. II 4G STRIOLATED BUNTING. russet; upper luandible and iris Lroun; inferior man- dible and feet yellow. The female and young, according to Temminck, have the bead and neck of a grey russet, marked with brown striae, more or less deeply shaded; all the other parts as in the male, but the colours less lively and pure. Figured by Cretzsclimacr, in Ruppell’s Atlas of African Birds, pi. 10, A. 47 GRANIVOEiK. Family FRINGILLIDyF. ( Bonaparte.) Geiuis Embekiza. (Linnceus.) MEADOW BUNTING. Emheriza cia. Emheriza cia, “ pratensis. Linka:us, S. N., and Authoes. Beisson, Ornith., vol. iii, p. 266, 1760. “ lotharingica, “ barhata, Cirlus stultus, Bruant fou ou de pres, Zipammer, Zigolo JiTuciatto, Ortolan de Lorraine, Foolish and Lorrain Bunting, GmelijST; Syst., 1788. SCOPOLI. Aldeovandus; Ornitli, vol. ii, p. 858. Of the Feench. Of the Gteemans. Savi. Buffon. Latham. Specific Characters. — Head grey, longitudinally marked with black; rump russet red; primaries edged on the outside with grey, first and sixth of equal length, and considerably shorter than the second, third, fourth, and fifth, which are nearly of the same length, the third being the longest in the wing. Length six inches and a fifth; carpus to tip three inches and a fifth; beak half an inch; tarsus four-fifths of an inch; tail three inches and a fifth. The Meadow Bunting is an inhabitant of a great part of the south of Europe, more especially Italy, 48 MEADOW EUXTIXC. Spain, and the shores and islands of tlie ^lediterranean. It occurs in the south of Germany, as far as the Illiine. It is stationary in some parts of Provence, and migratory in others: it is also a bird of passage in Lorraine. It is plentiful in Greece during the winter months, in which season it is mentioned by j\Ir. Carte as common in the Crimea, and by the Honourable JMr. Powys (“Ibis,” vol. ii, p. 138,) as resident, but not abundant, in Corfu. It does not appear to have been found in the north of Germany; and Temminck says it does not occur in Holland. Dubois informs us that it is occasionally found in Austria and Bavaria, and is very rare 'in Belgium. It is a bird of passage in Switzerland. It ranges through a great part of Asia — Syria, Arabia, and the Daouria; and is mentioned by Mr. Tristram among the birds of North Africa, (‘‘Ibis,” vol. i, p. 295.) Of its habits Naumann has given us the best des- cription, and I am principally indebted to him for the following history: — The Meadow Bunting a^ipears in Central Germany in March and April, and leaves in October or beginning of November, after which a solitary bird only is to be found. In Switzerland it is much rarer than the Cirl Bunting. It likes to live in mountainous places, not, however, in the wild and deserted parts, but among the fertile valleys. Sometimes it seeks out meadows, and is found among the bushes bordering woods, and it especially loves those places which are near cultivated fields and gardens. It also frequents the neighbourhood of water, and lingers about the banks of brooks and ditches, where it sits among the thickest bushes, and is often seen on the ground. It is a lively restless bird, pecking and fighting Avith other birds, as well as with the members of its MEADOW BUNTING. 49 own family. Its motion on the ground is heavy, and it has a quick, w'avy, or jerking flight. Its habits altogether are very similar to those of the Yellowhammer. Its call-note is a short sharp ‘zi-zi-zi,’ which some- times sounds like ^zip,’ and hence its German name. The song of the male is very similar to that of the Yellowhammer, but shorter and clearer. Bechstein expresses its note as ‘zi-zi-zi-zirr-zirr,’ others as ‘zip- zip-zip-zai-zip-zip-zip-zi.’ It is a diligent songster, and often sits upon the top of a rather low tree or bush. ^Vhen kept in confinement the Meadow Bunting is sometimes heard to sing at night. It is a pleasant bird in a room, and soon becomes very domestic, and may be kept for several years. Bechstein had a pair which he kept for several years. They are very affec- tionate to each other, and live sociably with different birds in confinement, preferring the Yellowhammer. The Meadow Bunting feeds upon insects, grass seeds, oats, and millet seeds. It will also eat hemp and poppy seed, and in confinement become quite content and healthy upon this food, with the addition of a little bread soaked in milk; as a treat nothing is so welcome as ants’ eggs or a mealworm. Naumann further remarks that they breed certainly in Germany, in Austria more frequently, but in Italy plentifully. The nest he describes as like that of the Yellowhammer, and the eggs similar to those of that bird, but they may be readily distinguished from both it and every other Bunting. They are roundish, short, and oval; dirty or greyish white, with many reddish and rust-brown streaks and hairs marked upon them. There are also shorter streaks, which the other Bun- tings have not. Brehm, in his description of the egg in Biideker’s work upon European eggs, says, ‘Tt 50 MEADOW DENTING. prefers high meadows, where it is found among the short bushes in the neighbourhood of vineyards. It does not often build on the lihine. Its nest is placed among the crevices of the artificial fences which sur- round the mountain vineyards, and generally contains four eggs, which have a grey whitish ground; shewing through it, brown, black, and grey lines, which often form a zone round the middle of the egg. These lines are connected together and form peculiar markings, by which they can be readily distinguished from any of the varieties of the Yellowhammer. Rarely they are marked with points, or round spots placed solitarily. They breed tAvice. The young birds are similar to those of the Yellowhammer, and, like them, are fre- quently bred in confinement.” Savi says it is doubtful if they breed in Tuscany, but they do so freely in the ultramontane countries. Their nest, Avhich is placed in low bushes, is made of moss externally, and with root filaments and wool in- ternally. Eggs four or five, with irregular zigzag lines and spots of black or dark violet-colour. Count Miihle’s description, in his ^''Grecian Orni- thology,” of the habits and plumage of E. da, is evidently taken from another species. He himself sug- gests the E. fucata of Pallas, with Avhich his description to a certain extent agrees. He says the bird Avhich he describes as E. da is ‘bieither confiding nor stupid, but shy, and knoAVs hoAV to escape the ambush of the hunter very skilfully. It flies up quickly, and rims along the goat-paths as quichly as a Lark” This certainly is not the habit of the Foolish Bunting. Moreover, he remarks, “the first primary is quite as long as the fifth, and much longer than the sixth;” which measurements are quite different from those of MEADOW liUXTTXG. 51 E. da, as ■will be seen by reference to iny specific diagnosis of that bird. Naumann concludes bis account of tire Meadow Bunting tlius: — “The Zipainmer, from its confiding nature is easily shot. They may be drawn in flocks by the Yellowhammer, as a decoy, and thus be cap- tured in great numbers, so that in France they have received the name of Fool. They are very good eating; they rejoice us with their song, destroy pernicious insects, and do no damage.” The adult male in its breeding plumage has the head and neck bluish grey, with two black bands along the sides of the vertex, and two other narrower bands of the same colour, one of which passes through the Ime of the eye, and the other forming a moustache; these lines unite, in the parotid region. The upper parts are bright russet, varied by longitudinal black stria? ; rump chesnut red; the throat is white; neck and chest delicate bluish grey; the rest of the under parts are russet red, brighter on the sides of the chest and flanks. AFings marked with two narrow whitish bands; wing coverts colour of the back; primaries blackish, bordered with russet; tail black, with the middle feathers bordered with russet, and the two most CACternal marked with a large white patch on the internal Avebs. Beak blackish above, grey below; feet and his brown. The female has the head, nape of the neck, and body varied Avith russet and black; rump and under tail coverts bright russet; inferior parts russet red, Avith the throat Avhitish; front of the neck and chest shaded Avith dull grey, and spotted with brown; flanks of a deeper russet, and more or less spotted Avith russet broAvn. MKAIXJAV P.UX'l'IXG. The young- before tlie first moult dilFer considerably from the adult. Top of the bead and nape grey, with a black streak in tire middle of cacli featlicr; upper parts of tlie body and wings varied like the female, but of a more grey russet; under tail coverts russet, with longitudinal spots of black; throat, front and sides of neck, and top of the chest grey, marked with black spots; the rest of chest and abdomen white, lightly washed with russet. — (Degland.) My figures of the bird and its egg are from specimens sent me by Mr. Tristram; the former is marked “Ksour, Jan. 28th., 1857,” and is therefore in its winter plumage. The egg was from a nest of four, taken by Mr. Tristram near Algiers, 1856. The bird has also been figured by BufFon, pi. enl. 3, fig. 2, female or young under the name of Brumit cle pres de France, and 511, fig. 1, male in breeding plumage, under the name of V Ortolan de Lorraine; Naumann, Naturg. Neue Ausg., pi. 104, figs. 1 and 2; Vieillot, Faun. France, p. 94, figs. 2 and 3 ; Boux, Ornith. Prov., pi. Ill and 112, male and female, but the figure marked a variety in pi. 112, is a male of F. ccBsia-, Bouteil, Ornith. du Dauph., pi. 32, fig. 6; Gould, B. of £., pi. 179. I GRANIVOR^:. Fumihj FRINGILLIDjF. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Emberiza. ( Linnanis.) ]iUSTIC BUNTING. Eniheriza rnstica. Fmheriza rvstica, (( (( “ leshia, ii it “ borealis, Hypocentor rusticus, Jji'uant rustique, Feldammer, Zigolo di Mitilene, Le Mitilene de Frovence, Pallas; Voy., vol. iii, p. G98, 1776. Latham; Ind., vol. i, p. 413. Temminck, 1820. Bonaparte. ScHINZ. ScHLEGEL. DeGLAND. Calvi; Catal. d’ Ornitli. di Geneva, p. 46. Savi; Ornitli. Tosc., vol. iii, p. 223. Zetteestedt; Besa i Lappra, voL i, p. 107. Cabanis. Of the French. Of the Germans. Savi. Buffon. Specific Characters. — Region of the rump russet; primaries bordered with russet, the first longer or as long as the third, the fourth shorter than the third; a large elongated white spot on the two external tad. feathers; beak straight, awl-shaped, and shghtly elevated at the point. Length nea,rly five inches and two-fifths . — Pegla n d . VOL. III. I 54 KL’STKJ liUNTlNG. There has been some confusion among the synonymcs of this bird. Bonaparte has made three species, namely, — E. rustica, Pallas, E. leshia, Gmclin, and E. procin- cialis, Gmelin. Schlegel makes only two of the three, namely, — E. rustica and E.fucata, including among the synonymes of the latter, both E. leshia and E. procin- cialis, and in a note, page 83, he remarks, — “This pretty species dift’ers from E. rustica, by the beak, which is more curved, and the feet, which are more robust; the beak of E. rustica is straight and awl- shaped, absolutely like that of E. pusilla. In winter, and when they are young, E. fucata and E. rustica resemble each other very much in the plumage.” Gould figures E. leshia and E. rustica. Temminck describes E. rustica, but he also introduces E. leshia as the Mitilene de Provence of Bufibn, and E. provincialis as the Bruant Gavoue of Bufibn. Degland follows Schlegel. It appears that amidst all this confusion there are two species as described by Schlegel, namely, E. rustica and E. fucata, but that there is really no au- thority for the introduction of the latter bird into the European list. To clear up the matter, I placed myself in communication with the best ornithologists in Europe, and I will here insert at length a letter with which I have been kindly favoured by Professor Blasius, of Brunswick, whose great knowledge of European birds gives a high value to his opinion upon the subject. “Brunswick, Jan. 12th., 1861. “Sir, — It seems to me that confusion among the species of the genus Emheriza is greater than in any other family of Passerines. The distinct species which are known to me as European, are as follow: — 1. — Emheriza striolata, Lichtenstein. In Africa, ac- RUSTIC BUXTIXG. 55 cidentally in Spain. One individual, from the south of France, is in the collection at Vienna. 2. — E. miliaria, Europe, E. Caspia, Menetries. From the original types at St. Petersburgh. d. — E. melanocepliala, Scopoli. Southern Europe. $ E. graniticora, Menetries. From the original type at St. Petersburgh. ? Euspiza dolgclionica, Bonaparte. From the original drawings of Bonajiarte. N.B. — E. icterina, Eversmann. Asia. Bonaparte gives this as European without adducing any proof. 4. — E. aureola, Pallas. North of Europe — North of Bussia. 5. — E. citrinella, Linnseus. Europe. 6. — E. cirlus, Linnaeus. South of Europe^i 7. — E. hortulanus, Linnaeus. Europe, (i,) Southern Russia E. ccesia, Cretzschmaer. 8. — E. clirysophrijs , Pallas. Northern Asia. Acci- dentally at Lisle. 9. — E. cia, Linnaeus. South of Europe, (b,') Eastern Russia E. cioides, Brandt; E. ciopsis, Bonaparte. N.B. — Bonaparte gives this variety of E. cia as European, without producing any proof. 10. — E. rustica, Pallas. North of Russia, and Boreal Asia. E. borealis, Zetterstedt; E. lesbia, Calvi and Savi; Mytilene de Provence, Buffon, pi. enl. 11. — E. pusilla, Pallas. Boreal Russia and Asia. 12. — E. intijornus, Pallas. Asia. Accidentally in East of Europe — Greece. 13. — E. scliceniculus , Linnaeus. Europe. E. Pcdlasii, Cabanis, original type; E. intermedia, Michahelles; E. provincialis, Gmelin, Bonaparte; Gavoue de Provence, Buffon, pi. enl. (b,) E. pyrrhidoides, Pallas. South of Europe. E. palustris, Savi. The two species, E. rustica, Pallas, and E. pusilla. 56 KUSTK! HUXTIXG. Pallas, are j^erfectly distinct and nnmistakeable. They both live and nest in the forests of Northern Russia, for instance, in the neighboiirhood of Archangel. E. rustica is also found in Lapland. There are correct figures of the tAvo species in the Appendix to Naumann, ‘Vogel Deutschlands,’ vol. xiii, pi. 388. These figures were taken from individuals Avhich I killed myself in the north of Russia, in the neighbourhood of Nidjing- Wiliki; the two species have also been taken in the Island of Heligoland, and in the middle of Germany. It is very difficult to interpret correctly Buffon’s figures, pi. enl. 656, figs. 1 and 2. Le Gamue de Pi 'ovence, p. enl. 656, fig. 1, has the beak, and is nearly of the same colour as E. schcBnicidus var. intermedia, JMichahelles ; but the figure is the type of E. provin- cialis, Gmelin, and is also the E. durrazzi, Bonaparte, that is to say E. schcenicidus , Linnseus. I think that is all that can be said of this question, nearly lost to Eui’opean ornithology. La Mitilene de Provence is perhaps, and will pro- bably be f est peut etre et elle sera prohahlement J an imperfect representation of E. rustica, Pall $ (Buffon, pi. enl. 656, fig. 2.) The form and contour of the beak, and the colour of the plumage, are characteristic of E. rustica; but Temminck’s description, Man. d’Orn., iii, p. 235, is perhaps a phantom of E. fucata, Pallas. This is the reason why E. fucata has been considered a European species, but it is a very uncertain suppo- sition, and a presumption made upon insufficient data. I think it possible that Temminck wrote his deserqjtion of E. leshia, Man., i, p. 317, from Buffon’s figure. The tAvo species, E. rustica and pusilla, Pallas, live regularly in the north of Russia, and they have been taken many times in Central Europe; but E. fucata, RUSTIC J5UMTNG. 57 Pallas, lias never been taken ivitli certainty in Europe. Accept tbe assurance, etc., etc., C. R. Bree, Esq., M.D. J, H. Blasius.” I think it will be allowed that tbe above letter from so good an authority, clears up much of the confusion which has been occasioned in the natural history of the Eurorean Buntings, by mistaking slight differences of plumage for specific distinctions. From Dr. Schlegel, of Leyden, I have also received a long letter, from which I make the following extract: — “The question of the synonymes of the Asiatic Em- heriza killed in Euro^ie is a very difficult one. I think it is almost unpossible to state which species are meant by Buffon, but I believe that all the Asiatic EmherizcB caught in Southern Europe belong either to rustica or pusilla, two species breeding as you know in Northern Russia, and visiting in small numbers the east of Europe. Emheriza fucata I believe now has never yet been observed in Europe: it is a species of Eastern Siberia and Japan, and very well characterized by its long Lark-like claws. I am also quite sure that the female and young of E. Scliceniculus have often been confounded with one or the other of those species, although easily distinguished by its longer tail.” The Rustic Bunting is, as has been stated in the above letter, an inhabitant of Northern Russia. It is mentioned by Middendorff as occurring in Siberia, and Temminck states that it has been observed in the Crimea. It has also been taken accidentally near Marseilles, one individual having been captured there alive, and kept in a cage for two years, by M. Barthelemy, the curator of the museum of natural histoi'y in that town. This gentleman, as quoted by 58 RUSTIC BUNTING. ]M. Crespon, informs ns that it is in its disposition lively and gay, that its cry resembles that of its congeners, ‘zir-zir,’ and that its song, which it keiit up in 1838, from April to the end of October, had some resemblance to that of the Fauvette a tete noire. Its plumage became rather paler at the autumn moult. It was fed upon millet and hemp seed. In Badeker’s work I find the following notice: — “It is a north-dwelling bird, which comes plentifully into Siberia, and rarely into Lapland, and builds in bushes. Its nest is similar to that of the Reed Bunting. It lays five eggs, which are somewhat smaller than those of the Reed Bunting. The ground colour is brownish grey, with violet grey spots, veined, and streaked, and clouded with chesnut brown.” “The male in breeding plumage,” according to Deg- land, whose descriptions are always accurate, “has the top of the head black, with a longitudinal band of russet Avhite upon the median line, which terminates at the occiput in a small white spot; nape red russet; back, scapularies, and upper tail coverts, marked with black spots, which are edged with reddish russet; throat, front of neck, and middle and lower part of abdomen of a pure white; this colour is surrounded on the neck by a blackish streak, and a large collar of red russet, which embraces the upper part of the chest; fianks with long spots of the same colour; under tail coverts white, with some brownish s^Dots; large superciliary band of pure Avhite, which is lost in the white spot on the occiput; wings like the scapularies, and barred with white; tail brown black, with the two median quills bordered with russet, and the two outermost on each side marked in their length with a white band, the smallest on the second.” RUSTIC BUXTING. 59 “111 autumn they should have, according to Temniinck, the black feathers of the vertex edged with brown, and the median hand of the same tint; on the sides and lower part of the neck is a row of small brown spots only.” Pallas’s description is the following; — “Head black, with three white bands, one in the middle of the vertex, the two others above the eyes in the form of eyebrows; neck and bend of the wing ferruginous; upper part of the body of a brown and russet tint; under parts white, vdth some russet spots on the neck; external tail feather on each side has a longitudinal and oblique white sjiot towards the tip.” My figure is taken from Gould. The egg is from Badeker. The bird has also been figured by Bufifon, pi. enl. 656, fig. 2, male; Boux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 109, fig. 1, young, fig. 2, adult; Naumann, Vogel Deutsch, Ajipen- dix, vol. xiii, pi. 388; Gould, Birds of Europe, pi. 177; Nilsson, Faun. Laponica, pi. 131, female. (10 (JRANIVOK.E. Family FRINGILLIBjF. (Bonaparte.) Genus Emberiza. ( Linncens.) YELLOW-HEADED BUNTING. Emberiza aureola. Emberiza aureola, “ Sihirica, Selj/sii, Euspiza aureola, Passerina collaris, lippocenter aureola, Pruant aureole, Kragenammer, Pallas et ArcT. Eversmann. Verant. Bonaparte. ViEILLOT. Cabanis. Brehm. Of the French. Of the Gtermans. Specijic Characters. — Occiput and rump ricli cliesnut brown; the first two primaries of equal length, and longer than the third; an elongated white mark on the inner web of outermost tail feather. Length five inches; carpus to tip three inches; tail two inches and a half; beak from gape two-fifths of an inch; tarsus seven-tenths of an inch. The Yellow-breasted Bunting of the Arctic Zoology and Latliam is one of those northern species, especially noticed by Pallas, which have a common habitat along the borders of the two continents of Europe and Asia. It ranges from the Ural mountains to Kamtschatka, and Y E I, L O A\' - H K A 1) E 1 ) J U X T I X G . ()1 is recorded by Temminck and Degland as liaving been seen during its migration in tlie Crimea. I do not, liowever, find any notice of its occurrence tliere by Dr. Carte or Captains Blakiston and Irby. Latliam says it inhabits the pine forests of Katberinesburg, and that it is not met witli on the poplars and willov/s in the islands of the Irtish and other rivers in Siberia. Middendorff notices its occurrence in his Siberische Beise ; and Brehm, in his description of eggs in Biideker’s work, has the following notice: — “This pretty little Bunting dwells among the bushes which overgrow the low meadow laird of Siberia, from the Ural to Kamtschatka. It builds an half-globular nest away from the ground, of sedges, grasses, or rushes, and lines its inside with feathers and hairs. It lays five eggs of a very pretty short oval shape, the ground- work of which is greyish green, with grey and blackish veins, black brown bordered points, having round spots marked upon them.” In the plate to which the notice refers, four varieties are figured, from which I have selected two. ]MiddendorfF also figures the egg. His drawing resembles most the lighter of the tivo varieties in my plate. The male has the top of the head a rich maroon, and the rump is of the same colour, though more mot- tled; back and wings are broAvn, shaded Avith longitu- dinal patches of a darker tint; the upper tail feathers are broAvn; those round the base of the neck and cheeks deep black; throat and chest canary yelloAV, being separated by a band forming a half-circle of the same rich maroon Avhich marks the top of the head ; abdomen and flanks light yellow; under tail coverts Avhite; pri- maries and secondaries the same uniform broAvn as the tail; tertials darker brown, edged Avith rufous; the A'OL. nr. K 62 YELLOW-HEADED BUYTIXG. ODtermost tail feathers only have a slight white patch on the inner weh ; beak brown above, yellow below ; feet brown. According to Degland the female has the vertex and crop maroon; nape and mantle dull brown, with longi- tudinal black spots; face blackish grey; the maroon band on the neeje very narroAv; flanks shaded with olive, and marked with large brown spots; the feathers about the carpus whitish grey. My figure is taken from a Siberian specimen sent to me by the Rev. H. B. d'ristram. It has also been figured by Gould, but the drawing represents too large a bird. I 63 GRANIVORiE. Family FRINGILLID^. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Emberiza. ( Linnceus.J YELLOW-BEOWED BUNTING. Emberiza elirysoplirys. Emberiza clirysoplirys, Pallas; Zoog. Eoss. Asiat., pi. 84, fig. 2. “ “ Selys; Faune Beige., pi. 4, fig. 1. “ “ Degland ; Tableau des Ois. du Nord de la France, et Cat. des Ois. observes en Europe ; (in the Memoirs of the Society of Sciences, Arts, and Agriculture of Lille, 1831 — 1845.) Orn. Eur., p. 249. “ “ ScHLEGEL; Eevue. “ “ Bonaparte; Consp. Avium Europearum. Bruant a sourcils jaunes, Of the French. Gelhbrauiger Ammer, Of the Germans. Specific Characters. — A yellow supercihary band' stretching be- yond the auditory orifices; beak straight. First primary as long as the fourth. Tail very much notched; the most lateral feather nearly white, spotted with brown only on the upper part of the internal web, and the under part of the external web; the following quiU edged with white outside. Length about six inches. This bird is an inhabitant of the north-east of Asia, and is occasionally found in those parts of Northern Europe contiguous thereto. Its occurrence in Europe, 64 YKLLOW-lilt()\VKl) lUNl'lNt;. is, however, accidental. One specimen Avas shot in the neighbourhood of Lille, in France, and is preserved in the museum of that town. Of the propagation and habits of this species I am sorry that I cannot refer to any authentic details. The folloAving description is from Dcgland: — “The male has the top of the head black, with a longitu- dinal Avhite line along the middle, Avhich mingles behind with a kind of half collar of the same colour; a large and long citron yellow hand above each eye; upper parts of the body ferruginous hroAvnish grey, darker in the middle of the feathers, Avhich are russet on their' borders; inferior parts grey white on the neck, with a kind of breast-plate on the crop of brown and russet feathers; the abdomen pure grey Avhite, with small spots of brown at the base of the crop and on the flanks; primaries brownish, bordered with russet outside. Tail quills brown, three-quarters of the most external white, Avith the end brown outside; the tAvo next to the external have the distal half Avhite. Beak and feet broAvnish ; iris brown.” It has been flgured by Pallas, and by De Selys, in the Faune Beige, (1842,) vol. i, pi. 4, fig. 1. LITTLE BUNTIXG. G5 GRAXIVOll^. Family FBINGILLIDJE. (Bonaparte.) Genus Emberiza. ( Linnceus.) LITTLE BUNTING. Fmberiza pusilla. Emheriza pusilla, «( (( (( <( Bruant Nain, Zwergammer, Pallas; Voy., 1776, Zoog., 42, No. 206. Gmelin; Syst., 1788. ScHLEGEL; Eevue, 1844. Degland; Ornith. Eur., 1849. Bonaparte; Consp. Avium Eur., 1850. Of the French. Of the Germans, Specijic Characters. — Occiput, cheeks, and part of throat fer- ruginous, with two distinct, deep black, irregular bands, extending from the base of the upper mandible over each eye, to the nape, where they turn round, and in some specimens form a more or less complete collar round the neck, mingled with white or fawn-colour; throat more or less M'hite, mingled with the ferruginous colour of the occiput and cheeks; base of the inner web of most external tail feather white, that of the second the same, but only half as wide; first and third primaries of nearly equal length, the second the longest in the wing. Length of male five inches and three-tenths; carpus to tip three inches; tail two inches and a half; beak two-fifths of an inch; tarsus seven-tenths of an inch. Female a little less. The Little Bunting E the last of the closely-allied I.ITTl.E r.rXTTNG. G() forms wliicli inliahit the northern parts of Russia and Eastern Siberia; and it will also close my list of this interesting genus. It lives and breeds in the neigh- bourhood of Archangel, and has been taken frequently, according to Blasius, in Central EurojJe. The specimen from which Schlegel drew his lengthened description in the Revue Critique, was captured in the neighbour- hood of Leyden, on the 18th. of November, 1842. It is included by Professor Blasius and Herr Giitke among the birds found in Heligoland. It is said by Pallas to be very common in the Daouria, and is re- ported by Mr. R. Swinhoe, as occurring in occasional flocks in Amoy (China) during the winter. — (Ibis, vol. ii, p. 61.) It is hardly necessary to enter into any discussion about the specific identity of this bird, after the very clear and convincing remarks of Professor > Blasius, which I published in the notice of E. rustica. M. He Selys- Longchamps ex23ressed a doubt, in a letter to Hegland, about the identity of SchlegePs sjDecimen with the bird described by Pallas, and referred it rather to the female of E. fucata. Upon this Degland remarks: — “Having seen in the museum of Leyden, the Emheriza pusilla of M. Schlegel, I cannot, with my distinguished friend, refer it to E. fucata; it has not the same kind of beak. This organ, instead of being convex above, and a little bent, is straight and awl-shajied, j^ointed, and slightly reversed at its tij). Its plumage is decidedly different.” Bona2)arte, in his “Consj^ectus of Euroj)ean Birds,” says of this species: — “It is a good s]3ecies of Siberia, which has been taken accidentally even in Italy; that of Schlegel is the true one, and neither of the two figures in my Italian fauna ought to be referred to it.” 1 I.ITTLl-: I’.UXTIXO. G' Its habits are no doubt siinilar to those of the closely-allied species which iudiahit the northern local- ities, hut I am not able to add anything authoritatively upon the subject. By the kindness of ]M..Verreaux, of Paris, I have been hivoured with a series of four specimens of this bird, three marked Europe, and one “Mer cV OcJiotysk, $ , ?” I have figured this last specimen, and the male in breeding plumage. The other two specimens are only distinguished by the less amount of russet on the throat in one, and its absence in the other, which I presume represent the more or less perfect winter plumage. The male in breeding plumage has the top of the head, cheeks, and throat rich russet red, with a broad black band stretching from the base of the beak over each eye to the occiput, where it joins a collar of cream- colour, which passes entirely round the base of the neck. Upper parts of the body dark brown, mingled with light russet, so as to shew a mottled appearance of those colours on the back, with the broad tertials nearly brown black; primaries rich hair brown, with their tips tinged with russet, and the outer web lightly edged with cream-colour; secondaries same colour, edged with a band of russet externally; rump greyish browm. Tail brown, the most external quill nearly all white, the second having a wedge- shaped band of that colour on the base of the broad inner Aveb, the base of the wedge being at the distal end of the feather. Crop and flanks cream-colour, thickly covered with longitudinal marks of black brown; abdomen grey white; under tail coverts cream- colour. Schlegcl describes the beak of a blackish horn-colour. GS I,TTTr,E r.UXTTXG. shading off into yellowish upon the edges of the man- dibles, and the base of the lower; feet and chnvs slender, and of a pale yellowish horn-colour; claws pointed, rather bent in, and of a pale blackish horn- colour. The bird marked by M. Verreaux $ , ? No. 23G53, is smaller than the male, but does not differ from it in plumage essentially, except in the absence of russet on the throat, the more uniform greyish white, and the fewer spots of the inferior parts. The colours are altogether less clear. My figure of the egg is taken from IMiddendorff. The bird has been figured in Naumann’s Appendix. i ili,, X A k A c II. 1 GRANIVOliJ^. Family FRINGILLID^. f Bonaparte.) Genus Pyrrhula. ( Brisson.J Generic Characters. — Beak short, conico- convex, and thick at the base, the sides inflated and bulging; upper mandible convex, deflected at the tip, and overhanging the lower one more or less. Kostrils basal, lateral, round, and for the most part concealed by bristly feathers at the base of the bill. Tarsus shorter than the middle toe; toes entirel}^ divided. Wings short; the first three primaries tapering, the fourth the longest in the wung. Tail of moderate length, slightly rounded, or square. SCARLET BULLFINCH. Pyrrhula Pyrrhula erythrina, Loxia erythrina, Erythrospiza erythrina, Carpodacus erythrinus, Pyrrhulinota roscecolor, rosea et erythrina, Erythrothorax ruhifrons, Loxia cardinalis, “ ohscura, Fringilla fiommea, Pyrrhula Sinaica, Souvreuil Cramoisi, Brand Posengimpel, erythrina. Temmixck. Pallas. Gmelix. Bonaparte. Gray. Kemp. Bonaparte. Dubois. Hodgson. Brehm. BeSEKE NEC LiNNjEUS. Gmelin. ? Eetztus. Muhle; Orn. Griech. Of the French. Of the Germans. VOl . III. 70 SCAKLET BULT.FINCH. Specific Characters. — Hump red or asli-coloured; abdomen pure white. The first primary equal in length to the third, and shorter than the second. Length five inches and a half; carpus to tip three inches and a half; expanse of wing ten to eleven inches; tlie closed wing reaches to two inches and a half of the length of the tail; tarsus nine to ten lines; middle toe seven lines, and its claw three lines; hinder toe four lines, and its claw three lines. — Naumann. The Bullfinches are a beautiful race of birds, and bow much soever our own British species is valued for this quality in our eyes, it is j)erbaps surpassed by the subjects of the present and following notice. The Scarlet Bullfinch inhabits the regions of the arctic circle, in the north of Europe and Asia. It is found in Sweden, Finland, Russia, and Siberia, more particularly near the Elvers Volga, Samara, Oder, and Selenga. It occurs solitarily in Courland and in Poland ; and Naumann especially mentions having found it in the summer of 1819, on Sylt, one of the islands on the west coast of Jutland, It occurs accidentally in France, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, and Central Germany, and has been captured at Hesse, on the Rhine. Hegland mentions that individuals have been shot at Abbeville, at Tournai, in the neighbourhood of Milan, and on the Swiss Alps; and Nordinann tells us, in the “Faune Pontique,” that it comes regularly in spring into the Botanic Gardens at Odessa, either singly or in pairs, and that it is common in the provinces situated to the east of the Black Sea. It is mentioned by Count Miihle as occurring in Greece, under the name of Pyrrhula Sinaica. During the summer it is essentially a northern bird, hut in the autumn it migrates southwards. If it stays the winter, it is found more especially in the neigh- SCAKLET BULLFINCH. 71 bourliood of dwellings, where it can he sheltered among the shrubs. It is very fond of moist situations, and is frequently found among the bushes on the banks of rivers, lakes, and ponds, where it may be seen on the willows or reeds. Xaumann has given a very complete account of the bird, from wdiich I have gathered the following: — “For several years, in the early spring, a pair of these birds were seen near Breslau, among the wil- lows and reeds of a swampy district. The male and female w'ere always near together, and the former sung gaily. They were both killed at a single shot, but the female was not found. The male is now in the museum at Berlin. Later another pair w'ere also shot. “This bird does not, according to my observation, like large thick woods. I have seen it where there was none at all, namely, at Sylt, in Jutland. In one part of this island there are no other species of trees but small thorn bushes. “In the northern narrow part of the island, where, between high sand downs, a narrow creek runs into the land, is a little thicket surrounded by a low earthen wall, in which is the renowned duck decoy. The ponds, canals, and the decoy man’s house are all surrounded by alder trees and thorn bushes. There is also a thick reed-bank, about ten feet high, which is all the protection that the neighbouring downs re- ceive from the devastating north-west storms. Altogether it is not more than a hundred paces in circuit. The wood is quite stunted, yet it is, for such a neighbour- hood, a very interesting spotj and for me it became still more so when I myself met with a Scarlet Bullfinch, which I had never seen before in its free SCARLET KULLFIXCH. 70 state. The male came to within fifteen paces, into a thorn bush, and sang. It allowed itself to be observed freely, without any marks of fear. The female was not to be seen, nor the young, which had already (June 7th.,) left the nest. The old decoy man, who chiefly dwelt there, knew of the nest, and took me to it, assuring me that these birds had for many years bred there, and that they were not rare in the island. That they also bred in the elder and meadow thorn bushes near the house, and Avere pleasant-singing cage-birds. After much seeking Ave found no more, but Ave discoA'ered the Common Linnet, for which they may probably liaA^e been mistaken by the decoy man,” “The Scarlet Bullfinch is very confiding to Avar ds man, being not at all shy. The singing male remains in the open, like the Linnet, upon the j^oints or tips of bushes, and flys aAvay like a shot when disturbed. Its call is a clear, piping, high tone, similar to Ticke, ticke, tuk,’ tAvlce repeated in a clear and perceptible manner. When a part of the song has been uttered, as far as my observation extends, the Avhole tone is A'aried into a longish cadence.” “W'heii Avith my friends Von Woldicke and Boie I last approached this celebrated decoy, at Sylt, I heard the song at a considerable distance, and I drew their attention to it, that there might be no mistake. The resemblance of the song to some of the notes of the Heed Bunting, as well as those of the Linnet, is a remarkable fact. Both these latter birds live in its neighbourhood. It is a very agreeable, loud, long, and, Avith many slight pauses, unbroken song; and it is so characteristic, that an ear like mine, Avhich from earliest youth has been accustomed to obseiwe the song of birds, can distinguish it in the far distance. In a CARLBT BULLFINCH. SCARLET BULLFINCH. 73 neighbourhood where little can escape the eye, the beautifully-plumaged songster, was easily recognised, and, as we did not like to shoot it, we placed our- selves at a short distance, where, unseen, we were able to observe it for a considerable time. It may be an agreeable cage-bird, but in confinement the red plumage turns into a permanent yellowish green.” The Scarlet Bullfinch lives xipon various kinds of seeds, more especially, according to Dubois, those of, an oily nature, as well as those of the elm or alder. Xaumann also suggests that it feeds upon the seeds of the reeds, among which it likes to live. The same authority informs us that it nests among the woody plantations in the neighbourhood of St. Petersburg. The nest is formed of wool, dry grass stalks, and twigs, and lined with feathers and horse-hair. It lays five or six eggs, light green, spotted at the larger end with small black dots. Brehm, in Badeker’s work upon European eggs, has the following notice of the nidification of this bird: — “They nest in the thick woods and bushes of Siberia, in Lausatia, in the neighbourhood of Galitz, in Galicia, and in Poland — near Warsaw, where it is found in swampy situations overgrown with alder trees. Once, in June, it was met with, paired, in Penthendorf. The nest is placed in a bush, and is made of moss, sticks, dry twigs, and sheep’s wool, and is lined with hair and wool. The eggs arc a lively blue green in colour, more or less marked with black or brownish dots and spots on the larger end. They are inclined to pear-shape in form, without, like the other Bull- finches, being sw'ollen in the middle.” The male in breeding plumage has the small feathers in the nostrils and around the neck, of a dull rose- 74 SCARLET BULI.ITNCH. colour; tlie base of all the feathers, as well as a narrow streak along the shafts, of a brown red; rump, sides of the head, throat, front of neck, and chest, of a bright or rose crimson; belly and abdomen of a pure white ; back and wing coverts ashy brown, tinged with a little red towards the extremity or tips of the feathers; quill feathers of both wings and tail blaekish brown, bordered with reddish; tail forked, beak and feet brown. The female has all the upper parts of an ashy brown, with large longitudinal spots of a darker brown; throat and eheeks regularly spotted with white and brown; front of neck and all the under parts of a pure white, marked with large longitudinal spots of dark brown; middle of belly without spots. It is stated that the male adopts in winter the plumage of the female . — ( T emminck. ) The young males are not red in the first year; they have a remote similarity to the female of our Linnets, but are distinguished from them by having more of a greenish tint pervading the whole plumage, especially through the yellowish borders of the wing feathers; the head, under part of the neck, back, and shoulders, as Avell as the wing coverts, are brown grey, but something brighter on the borders of those feathers which are of a greenish colour; rump dirty yellow green; the dirty white throat has down its sides small brownish feathers, which become larger on the upper part of the breast, where the ground is also brownish, but on the sides is shaded into brownish grey; belly and under wing feathers dirty white, without spots ; the dark brown wing feathers have on the outer side a yellow greenish bordering, which makes them brighter; beak and feet are like those of the old male, but of SCARLET BULLFINCH. a brighter colour, namelj a dirty yellowish or brown yellowish flesh-colour, the tips of the claws being dark brown. — (N aumami.) In the first part of the Bulletin of the Imperial Society of Naturalists of Moscow, for the year 1860, there is an article by Alexander Von Nordmann, upon the birds of Finland and Lapland, in which he states that P. erythrina is very common in Southern Finland, which was not the case, according to the testimony of his father, thirty years ago. It builds every year in the Botanical Gardens at Helsingfors, in the tops of the maple and Carangana Sibirica. It arrives at Helsingfors in the middle of IMay, and the young are fledged by the 25th. of June. The nest is made loosely of twigs. The eggs are white, with a few blackish red spots at the large end. The voice of the bird is loud and flute-like, easily recognised again when once heard. It has a call-cry similar to our Greenfinch. — (See ‘This,” January, 1861, p. 111.) The figure of my bird is from Naumann. The egg is from Badeker. The bird has also been figured by Gould, B. of E., pi. 206; Dubois, Oiseaux de la Belgique, pi. 117, (male and female;) Naumann, Natur. der Vogel Deutsch., pi. 113, (male and female.) 7(> GRAXIVOll.E. Family FRINGILLID^. (Bonaparte.) Genus Pyrrhula. ( Brisson.) KOSY BULLFINCH. Pyrrhula rosea. Pyrrhula rosea, Passer roseus, Fringilla rosea, Carpodacus roseus, Pouvreuil-rose Pallas, Sibirischer Rosengimpel, Temminck. Pallas. Of Authors. Kaup. Bonaparte. Of the French. Of the Germans. Specific Characters. — The vertex red, with silver-white spots; throat also mottled with crimson and white; rump crimson or yellowish white; two transverse bands of white across the wings. Length five inches and a half, French, (Temminck,) six inches and a half, German, (Naumann;) expanse of wings eleven inches and a half; length of somewhat notched and forked tail two inches and five-eighths. The wing does not reach to half the length of the tail; the club-shaped beak five and a half lines; tarsus three-quarters of an inch; middle toe and claw seven lines; hinder toe and claw rather over six lines; leg and toes covered with scales. — (XaX'Mann.) The Ivosy Bullfincli is described by Naurnann as the most beautiful of our Northern European birds. Closely allied to the last species, it yet differs from it in size and ornamentation. Its beak is quite dif- EOSY BULLFINCH. I i ferent, being narrower and more pointed, liaving more the clraracter of that of the true Finches. The measurements also of the two species, which I have taken from Naumann, shew very important structural differences. The Rosy Bullfinch is found in Northern Asia, principally in Siberia — on the banks of the rivers Uda, Selenga, etc., visiting in the winter the eastern parts of the south of Europe, and occasionally it has been captured in Hungary. It has also, hut very rarely, been seen in the north-east of Germany; and it is not improbable that it is there, but has escaped observation. It has also been included by Professor Blasius among the list of birds captured in Heligoland. Very little is known of the natural history of this bird. This may in a great measure arise from its being very frequently mistaken for the last. Pallas says, however, that it is rare even in Siberia. Nau- mann senior saw it free once only, and then was not acquainted with its name for several years after. Temminck, in the first edition of his “Manual,” con- founded it with the Scarlet Bullfinch. The Rosy Bullfinch likes to live in bushes which grow near water, and occasionally comes into gardens, accompanied by the Snow Bunting. It feeds upon all common seeds, according to Naumann, and on the kernels of various berries. About its propagation nothing is known. The adult male has the forehead and throat of a silvery and shining white; vertex, neck, and body of a very bright crimson red, with the feathers of the back and scapularies black in the centre; two bands of a rosy white on the wings, of which the coverts are edged with dirty white; cheeks, lo-wer part and VOL. III. M 78 ROSY BULLFIXCn. sides of neck, and cliest, crimson red; belly and under tail coverts rosy white; primaries and tail quills brown, edged with rose on the outside; beak and feet clear brown. In the young before the first moult the entire plu- mage is of a reddish grey, longitudinally spotted with brown; Avith two bands of reddish yellow on the wing, and the rump yellowish. After the fii’st moult a little Avhite appears on the forehead, and the red becomes more brilliant Avhile the spots disappear: thus the specimen described by Pallas as having Avhite only on the forehead, and Avith its plumage broAvner, must haA’e been a young bird after moulting. — (P'emminck.) The folloAving is from Naumann’s account of this bird, Avhich I insert to make my description as complete as possible. I quote from the above accurate obserA'cr’s beautiful Avork on the ‘‘Birds of Gennany,’^’ a AAmrk, Avhich I may take this opportunity of saying, is, in my oj)inion, both for full and elaborate description, and for the beauty and natural expression of its illus- trations, perhaps unrivalled in ornithological literature. — “The size is that of a Mountain Finch, and larger than the Common Linnet, but in contour it someAvhat resembles them both. The beak is reddish grey, the root of the superior mandible being yelloAvish; the round nostrils are ornamented Avith stiff small feathers, and the iris is rust broAvn. The broAvnish yelloAV feet are tolerably strong and robust; the claAvs, not very large, but sharp, are dark broAvn at the tip, but have othei’Avise the colour of the feet. “The old male has tAvo distinct characters of plu- mage,— brown, and a splendid carmine red; and the last, with Avhich the Avhole bird seems to be suffused, makes it one of the most beautiful of northern birds. EOSY BULLFINCH. 79 The head and neck are carmine red, irith a brown grey sparkling through it, so that the feathers (like, in fact, those of the whole bird,) are more or less dark, having a ground of grey and white, and the red colouring only taking possession of the tips or edges of the feathers. On the temples, the hinder part of the head, the throat, to the middle of the breast, and the rump, this colouring is the brightest, a deep brilliant rose red; and on the sides of the breast dark brovm arrow-shaped spots on a whitish ground, be- coming larger on the flanks, with, on this part of the body, a yellow white tinge; the belly and under wing coverts are white, Avith rosy red borders. There is one peculiarity to be noticed, namely, that in this northern bird, as Avell as in the male of PyrrJmla longicauda, Temminck, Avhich is the Loxia Sihirica of Pallas, the feathers of the vertex and throat have a silvery scaly appearance, and the barbs of the feathers, as well as their points, have a bright shining white colour. The shoulders and uiiper part of the back are dark broAvn, spotted Avith red streaks; the dark brown feathers of this part have borders of carmine red; the greater feathers of the shoulders haA^e also white bor- ders. All the wing feathers have a dull dark broAvti ground; the lesser Aving feathers carmine red borders, the greater, broad white borders, Avith rosy red tips. The greater wing coverts rosy red borders with Avhite tips, forming tAvo oblique borders of Aidiite across the wings. The upper tail coverts bright red, with dark brown arroAV-spots, and the darker broAim tail feathers, of Avhich the outermost are merely someAvhat lighter, have rosy red borders; the underneath Aving and tail feathers are light brown grey; the under Aving coverts dirty white, spotted Avith broAvn, having, at the edges, a tinge of rosy red. 80 KOSY I5UI-LFIXCH. ‘‘In tlic autumn plumage, tlie borders of the -sving and tail featliers are broader, shading into a brownish white, and in the back and shoulder the red bordered feathers have besides brownish white edges. The splendid red is there also darker, and acquires its brilliancy by degrees under the influence of air and sun. Probably the young male is not so beautifully red, and in the first year perhaps not at all so as in the preceding species, ( P. erytlirina,) and the females of both are certainly very similar. I have only seen two male stuffed specimens of this splendid bird to examine and compare with P. erytlirina and P. purpurea, the Bouvreil violet de la Caroline of Brisson.” It has also been figured by Gould, B. of E,, 207. 81 GUAmVORM. Family FFINGILLIDJE. (Bonaparte.) Genus Pyrrhula. ( Brisson.J DESERT TRUMPETER BULLFINCH. Pyrrhula githayinea. Pyrrhula githayinea, ft (6 “ payrcaudaei, Fringilla githayinea, “ thehaica, Erythrospiza githayinea, Cat'podacus payreaudaei, Pucanetes githayinea, Serinus “ Erythrothorax githayinea, BouvreuiUrose “ Trompeter gimpel, Papageien “ Eosen “ Egyptscher rosen-gimpel. Temminck. Eoux. Bolle; Naumannia, 1858, p. 369. Audouin ; Descr. Egypt. Zool. Lichtenstein. Hemprich; Sched. Mus. Berolin. Bonaparte. Gray; Gen. of Birds. Cabanis; Mus. Hein., p. 164. Gloger. Chr. L. Brehm. Of the French. Cabanis. C. L. Brehm. A. Brehm. Schlegel. Specific Characters. — The small feathers all round the base of the beak rose carmine; rump, external borders of the primaries and abdomen a most delicately beautiful rose pink; no transverse bands across the wings; the first q.uill feather the longest in the 82 DESERT TRUMPETER RULLEINCH. wing. Length five indies and a half; from carpus to tip three inches and three-eighths; the tip of the wing reaching, when closed, within one-third of an inch of the end of the tail. Tail two inches and three-eighths long; tarsus three-quarters of an inch; beak from gape five-eighths of an inch; height of beak five- twelfths of an inch; circumference of beak at base one inch. This elegant bird is a native of Africa, and has only- been known to occur in Europe with certainty in Pro- vence, Tuscany, and the Grecian Archipelago. It is found however at Malta, the bird figured in the “leones Fauna Italica,” having been captured there. It is seen in the island from December to IMarch, and its desig- nation “The Trumpeter,” is derived from its Maltese name “Trumbettier.” It is mentioned by Captain Loche among the birds observed by him in Algeria, and is especially found in Nubia and Syria. A long and in- teresting account of its residence and habits in the Canary Islands, from which the following history is principally taken, is given by Dr. C. Bolle, in “Naumannia,” for 1858, pp. 369-393; and in Cabanis’ “Journal fur Orni- thologie,” for 1859, p. 469, a further account of it is given by Chalihl ElFendi, as it was found by him in the desert regions of the north-east of Africa, on the banks of the Nile, in Upper Egypt, in the oases of Nubia, where it occurs in large flocks, and in Arabia Petrea. Dr. C. Bolle’s monograph is a model of this kind of descriptive natural history, going into full particulars of all the habits and nidification of a most interesting bird, hitherto generally dismissed by authors with the brief remark, “Ses mamrs, ses habitudes, son regime et sa pro- jyagatiou sent inconnus.” In the early part of his account. Dr. Bolle reprobates the system of name-making in modern days; the present DESERT TRUMPETER nULLFIXCiI. 88 bird being classed by various authors as an Emheriza, a Frmgilla, Pyrrhida, Carpodacus, Erytlirospiza, Ery- throthorax, Serinus, or Bucanetesl I have preferred, however, keeping it where it is placed by its structural affinities in the genus Pyrrhida, It may be considered as the ground and desert type of that genus, not far removed from the two preceding species. It is truly, as Dr. Bolle remarks, a bird of the Sa- hara. He writes about it as follows: — “Far beyond the other side of the fruitful coast-line of North Africa, which borders southwards the Mediterranean Sea, the cultivated fields of the Arabs are surrounded by a margin of desert, where a new unexplored kingdom, with a scanty but strange world of plants and animals, comes into view. Silence, as of the grave, reigns supreme in the terrible Sahara, where the sea of sand has its waves agitated by the poisonous breath of the Simoon. Through this run the routes of the caravans, and its palm-shaded oases and wadis, which during the falls of winter are flooded with water, and are adorned with thickets of mimosse and tamarisks.” It was in the two Canary Islands Lanzarote and Fuertaventura, which appear to have been divided from the Sahara by the sea, and bear the character of scenery above described, that Dr. Bolle found the Desert Trum- peter in great abundance, and where his observations upon its habits were made. “Whoever,” says Dr. Bolle, wishes to know the dwelling-place of P. githaginea, must not expect to follow me as when I described the wild Canary bird into the glades of the Hesperides, through hollows rich in flowers, and bordered whth woods of laurel. The Fortunate Islands are in no way similar to the ever- 84 DESERT TREMrETEU UrEEElNCII. green colour in wlrich they appear to travellers who pass these land-marks of navigation in the height of summer. The Desert Trumpeter is found most plentifully in Lanzarote and Fuertaventura, and most sparingly in the great Canary Island. I found it in fact spread over the whole eastern part of the Canary Islands, and have reason to believe that it may inhabit the more western parts also. On the 1st. of April, 1856, I found it in an excursion to Caldeca von Bandama, on the high-road which leads from Ciudad de las Palmas to the Vegas, and welcomed it joyfully as an old acquaintance one comes upon un- expectedly. It is seen, but less plentifully, in the neigh- bourhood of the principal town, but at the time of migration it appears in great numbers in the harbour, Puerta de la Luz. I have also observed it in the districts of Jinamar, Cariizal, and Juan Grande, and nowhere more abundantly than in Arguineguin, where it frequents in flocks the tombs and ruins of a town which at one time had been plundered by the Spaniards, which now covers a cape or promontory with rocks and grottoes, and fig-trees in the back ground, and com- mands an incomparable panorama over the sea tow'ards the peak of Teneriffe, It also breeds in the islands of the western group, since the thick growth of wood has driven it back there, but it has not been seen hitherto on Teneriffe, Gomera, Palma, or Ferro.” ‘^The country inhabited by the Desert Trumpeter must above all things be without trees, and in the hot regions of the sunny coast. It prefers stony places, where in the noon-day the wind trembles over burning stones, and by the glimmer, and reflected light of which the traveller is almost blinded. Only a little grass grows desi<:rt trumpeter bullfinch. 85 in summer betAveen tire parclied and bleaclied yelloAV stones; and here and there at wide intervals the low bushes of the taybayba, f Euphorhia halsamifera,) or the thorny prenanthes, only eaten by the dromedary, spring up. Here the Trumpeter lives — a Bullfinch Avith the manners of a Stonechat. It is always found in sociable little groups, Avhen the cares of the breeding- season do not keep it solitary. The cheerful little bird dances from stone to stone, or glides about near the ground, but seldom can our sight follow it far into the landscape, for the reddish grey feathers of the old bird mix as closely with the colours of the stones and leafless stems and tAvigs of Euphorbia, as the isabelle of the young does with the pale yellow of the sand or chalk. AVe should soon lose it if its voice, Avhich is one of its most striking peculiarities, did not guide us to it. Listen! A note like that of a small trumpet trembles through the air, and vibrates continuously; and if Ave are very attentive Ave shall, hear just before and just after it tAvo gentle light notes ringing like silver bells through the still desert, or the almost imperceptible chords of an harmonium played by unseen hands. Again it changes, and this time its notes resemble the deep croak of the green frog of the Canaries, but less coarse, hastily repeated one after another, and Avhich the little bird will itself ansAver with almost similar but weaker sounds, like a ventriloquist, as though they came from the far distance. Nothing is more difficult than to des- cribe in language the notes of birds. They must be heard to be appreciated, and no one Avould expect to hear so remarkable a song from a bird in such a locality. The aboA-e trumpet-like tones often ending in a succes- sion of crowing and humming, distinguishes the habitat VOL. III. N 8G DESERT TUr-MPETER BULEFI>'CTr. of tliese birds. They live almost so completely in tlic uninhabitable country around, that they arc ahvays joy- fully welcome, and listened for attentively when silent, dliey are as the melancholy voices of the desert, or as the Djuns of the solitude. ‘Vox clamant is in. dcsertoi’ The Desert 'rrumpeter does not appear frequently on the stec]) rocky liills, at least I have only once met with it in such a situation, and that was in April, 185~. It is much more partial to the black lava stream of the desert, which, full of gaping- rents and chasms, hardly permits a blade of grass to become green. It never settles on a tree or bush, like the Stonechat. In inhabited dis- tricts they are rather shy, yet where, as in Handia and nearly all the south of Fuertaventura, the silence and solitude of the desert is unbroken, they are very con- fiding, especially the young, which, when we meet with them unexpectedly seated on a stone, will peer with their little brilliant eyes quite into one’s face. They feed entirely, or almost so, on the seeds either of grasses, which are found like a mealy kind of bread in their stomachs when killed, or the oily seeds of composite and cruciferous plants, which they shell like other finches, by moving them most carefully backwards and forwards between the mandibles of their strong beak. They will also eat tender young leaves. They cannot long dispense with -water, and often must fly some miles daily to get it. Their presence in the desert is always a good omen for the thirsty traveller. I have constantly seen them flying to drink in flocks. They drink much at a time in long draughts, between which they lift up their heads. After drinking they are very fond of bathing. I have never seen them roll about in the dust like Sparro-ws. The breeding-time begins in March, and like those of most true desert birds, the DESERT TRUMPETER JiU LLFIKCH. 87 nest is well concealed, and witli such foresight, that it can hardly ever be found. I have never succeeded in discovering one, though I have many times sought in vain, as did Brehm in Egypt, who writes, ‘In the month of March P, githa- ginea is in breeding-plumage, but I have never succeeded in discovering any more about it. The masses of rock on both sides of the Nile form a very favourable nest- ing-place, but they extend so much that the naturalist cannot pursue his object with any good result.’ I know, however, from the goatherds of E uertaventura, that the Mores', as they are called there, build in crevices under large overhanging stones upon the ground. The nest has a tolerably strong texture, and is woven with the coarse straw of the desert grass, and lined within with great feathers, mostly of the ostrich and bustard, as well -as the wool of the camel and hair of the goat. The number of eggs is from three to five. They cer- tainly breed twice, if not more frequently. The second moult takes place in July. Individuals quite tired have been seen by fishermen flying over the arm of the sea and the islands of the coast. These journeys shew why it appears yearly in Malta as a bird of passage, as this island makes the direct line from the Western Sahara and Canary Islands to the deserts of the Syrte, bordering on the Mediterranean. The Desert Trumpeter does not appear to have many enemies in its native home, as with the exception of the wild cat and a few stoats, it has no four-footed foes. The Horned Owl can scarcely find it under the flat stones, and in the clifts which protect it. It has only to beware of the Kite, (Milvus regalis.)’’^ Dr. Bolle v'as a long time before he could keep them alive in confinement, but he at length succeeded, and 88 DESKKT 'J'KUMI’ETEll (5U ELElXCir. he gives a most interesting account of tlicir habits. He says they are peaceful and gentle, very tame and sociable with each other, or with other birds. The male bird sings in the late autumn and winter. They love company, and constantly call to one another. He kept his birds in a room with plenty of light, and when the lamp was brought in they began their song. The tone is sometimes clear and beautiful, but Avith a short trumj)et, or a prolonged drony or quaking sound, Avhich appears to be the key-note of their song, and to Avhich is often added various modulated tones, sometimes re- sembling the purring of a cat. The ‘ka, ka, ka,’ AA^hich they constantly rejAeat, ansAvers, as a rule, one much deeper, softer^ and shorter. Rarely they may be heard uttering a Ioav chattering, like the little parrot; they Avill also cackle like the hen, ‘kekek, kekeek,’ three or four times in succession. Their alarm note is a loud ‘schak, schaok.’ When hunted and caught they shriek Avith anguish. Their notes are almost Avithout exception so full and expressive, that we Avonder hoAV such a small creature can produce them. The female has not the trumpeting tone so loud as the male has in spring.” “In confinement the first egg was laid on the 24tli. of April. They are four in number, rather large for the bird, pale sea-green, or lighter, Avith small spots and points of reddish broAvn, thinner at the smaller end, and forming at the larger end a kind of croAvn or Avreath.” The male bird has the top of the head and nape ashy grey. The back more or less broAvnish ash-grey, with reddish edges to the feathers; the greater Aving coverts, pale broAvnish, edged Avith rosy red; the pii- maries are a glossy hair-broAvn, Avith their outer edges fringed Avith rosy pink, their tips being bordered (the DESERT TRUMPETER BUELFIXCH. 89 first three slightly, the rest more broadly,) 'with cream}^ white; in the secondaries the outer border is the broadest, and the cream-colour is more deeply tinged with rosy pink; the tail is emarginate, and the feathers present the same deep brown coloxir, broadly edged with cream-colour and rosy red, as the wing feathers, so that when the wings are closed, they form, with the tail, a pleasing striped appearance. All the under parts (more or less,) the under tail coverts, feathers round the beak and rump are rosy red, mingled on the crop and abdomen with grey. Dr. BoUe says that when old, the males have the scapularies speckled with red, and that this colour is much deeper on the back. In autumn the male is less beautiful,- — the red is less remarkable, and the ashy grey above, changes into a dull grey brown, on which account, after moulting for the first time, they have a strongly marbled appearance. In this stage a reddish shade on the back is above all perceptible. The beak is a rosy coral colour, which Dr. Bolle says gives it in the distance the appearance ^of an exotic bird. Tarsi and feet rose; iris brownish black. The female is above brownish grey, hut that colour is lost in the clearer tints below, which from the throat downwards, become exclusively 'whitish. The upper part of the wings reddish grey. On the throat and immediately under the beak clear rose; tail rosy red; scapularies edged with rosy red. The greater wing coverts and tail feathers like the male, only smaller, and the rose less marked; under tail coverts pale reddish grey; feet paler rose than the male. No hands across the wings of either sex. The plumage of the young differs somewhat from that of the adult. IITien it leaves the nest it is clear 90 DESERT TRUMPETER RUI.LEINCTI. light colour, or dull isabelle yellow, which Dr. llolle .says Dcghmd wrongly ascribes to the female. This colour goes doAvn wards from the throat Avithout any streaks, and gradually blends into Avhitish; there is no trace of red, not even on the almost isabelle yellow tint. The under tail coverts are yelloAvish; greater and lesser wing coverts, wings, and tail have a darkish broAvn colour, Avith a speckled grey yelloAV on both edges; beak and feet flesh-colour. (Bolle.) My flgure of this bird is a male sent to me by Mr. Tristram, and marked “Biskara, 212nd. Jan., 1857.” The egg is also from a specimen sent me by the same gentleman. The bird has also been figured by Temininck et Tangier, planche color, 400, figs. 1 and 2; Boux, Or- nith. ProA’., vol. i., suj^p. plate 74, bis, young male in autumn plumage; Gould, B. of E., pi. 208. The folloAving have been by A^arious authors admitted into the European list of the genus Pijrrhula: — 1. — Pyrrliula coccinea, Selys. — The Greater Bullfinch, ^Boucreuil ponceau of the French,) differs in nothing Avhatever from the Common Bullfinch except in size, and having rather more Avhite on the rump, and the band of this colour across the Avings being rather broader. W^e are informed by Dubois (Oiseaux de la Belgique, p. 125,) that it never mixes Avith the common species. It Avas first introduced as a distinct race by Yieillot, Diet., 1817, and after by M. Le Baron Selys-Longchamps, in his “Faune Beige.” Schlegel, hoAveA^er, in his ‘^Be- vue Critque,” 1844, declined to admit it as a distinct species, having never seen it in nature. De Selys himself only considered it as a local race of the Common Bullfinch. Degland admits it into his “Ornithologie desert trumpeter ruelfinch. 91 Eiiropeenne/’ with the following remarks : — The size of the Bouvreuil ponceau is constantly larger than that of the common species; there is a difference in the proportions of their wing primaries, in the strength of their note, and it is certain that they always flock separately.” Bonaparte, who admits it into his ‘‘Conspectus Avium Europaearum,” 1850, and in his “Critique,” p. 27, makes the following remarks about it: — “I would not answer for this not being in reality a constant race or species, evi- dently that which Graba would have represented in his work upon northern birds.” Lastly, Dubois admits it as a distinct species, under the designation of Pyrrhula coccinea, Leisler, and re- marks upon it: — “This bird is in many respects like the axen Chatterer, appearing only from time to time. Sometimes it is not seen for several years, and then shews itself in great numbers. These Bullflnches have their periodical migrations, and unite together sometimes in large, and at other times in small flocks before starting. They have been seen in Belgium in 1836, 1840, 1846, and 1850; but in the autumn of 1855, there was such a number taken, that they might have been bought by the dozen at the game-dealers. Our learned naturalist M. Le Baron Selys-Longchamps, had the honour of being the first to flgure this bird in his “Faune Beige,” and other naturalists have followed his example. This Bullfinch has been long known as the Great Bullfinch among bird-catchers. Naturalists have con- founded it with the Common, although from its size it ought to form a separate species, and it is never kno'svn to join the Common Bullfinch when they assemble for their periodical migrations. It is distinguished by a more brilliant red and greater development of the white BESEKT TRUM PETEK BULEFTXCH. mark on the rump. The species, according to all ap- pearances, belongs to the north of Europe, but as it has always been confounded Avith the Common Ihdl- finch, it is not jrossible to assign it a fixed locality.” Such is the history of this bird. I sec no reason Avhatevcr for constituting it a distinct species any more than for forming different species out of the A'arictics of rams 2>alustns, which Mr. A. Nervton has shcAvn to present at least three different forms between this country and Laplaiifl, but not sufficient to constitute specific difference. Having seen the birds I entirely agree in this opinion; and the rule which seems to obtain with most birds of exhibiting strongly marked and permanent climatic variation, must not be overlooked as it applies to the present one. Under any circumstances it is quite unirecessary that I should give a figure of this assumed species. 2. — P. Langicauda, Temminck, P. Sibiricus, Pallas. — This bird was stated by Temminck to have been cap- tured in Plungary, and it is admitted into the European list by Keyserling and Blasius. It is hoAvever rejected by Schlegel, Degland, and Bonaparte. There does not appear any authentic account of its occurrence in Europe. It inhabits Eastern Siberia and the Altai mountains. 3. — P. Caucasica, Pallas, Loxia ruhicilla, Guldenstadt, is admitted into the European list by Keyserling and Blasius, Schlegel, and Bonaparte. The latter says of it: — ^‘The Loxia ruhicilla of Guldenstadt is a Carpodacus; but it is much more strongly formed than ErytJirina, Avith which in other respects it has less affinity than with P. roseus, Avhich is also much smaller.” He then alludes to a female in the collection of M. De Selys, about the authenticity of which there is some doubt. DESERT TRUMPETER BULI-FIXCTI. 98 Degland also remarks of this bird, “This geniis f Coc- cothraustes ) M'as established by Brisson, and only includes our HaAvfinch. The Count de Keyserling, Professor Blasius, and INI. Schlegel place in this genus the C. Caucasicus of Pallas, Loxia ruhicilla, Guldenstadt, But this bird was only known to the latter naturalist; it resembles in size, form, and coloration the Pine Bunting; it is not certain that it belongs to the genus Coccoth- ■raiistes, and as it is only taken in the Caucasus, I do not include it in this catalogue, and must refer for a description to the “Revue” of M. Schlegel, p. 79.” This description is that of Guldenstadt, and is very clear and minute. It appears to be intermediate between the Pine Bull- finch and the Hav'finch, of a soft red colour, variegated Muth vdiite and grey. It is indigenous to the Caucasian Alps, delighting in the cold regions frequented by the Pine Bunting, especially the beds of gravelly rivers, where it feeds on the berries of the Hippoplioes rham- noides. It assembles in flocks, and imitates the notes of the Bullfinch. There is scarcely any difference in the sexes. “The top of the head, throat, underneath the neck, and chest, intense red, marbled with ■white acutely tri- angular spots and streaks; abdomen and under tail coverts weak rose, Avatered Avith AAdrite; tail feathers beloAV rosy-fuscous. Xeck above and back greyish, -with a rosy tinge; tail feathers above rosy-fuscous. The base of all the feathers Avhich lie in situ, and Avhich con- stitute the greater part of all the plumage is intensely grey. The closed Aving is an inch shorter than the tail; the primaries and tail quills are fuscous, indistinctly margined Avith rose; the axillary feathers colour of the back. The tail is three inches and six lines long; the A'OL. III. 94 DESEET TlirMPETER l!T'I,T,ETXrTr. t-svelve tail feathers brassy-black, the tip of each external margin white, the rest shaded with rose. The thighs are feathered to the knee, and grey; the tarsus and toes, of which there are three before and one behind, of a black colour, claws incurved, acuminate, black, equal anteriorly, the hind one -.longest. Length eight inches, of wings four inches nine lines, tarsus one inch one line, middle toe nine lines, hind toe five lines.” Figured by Guldenstadt, Nov. Comm. Petr, xix, pi. 12. I have thought it right to give a translation of the principal part of Guldenstadt’s diagnosis of this bird, and regret that I have not a specimen to figure, although confined as it is to neutral ground, its claims to Euro- pean rank are very slight. 1 GPvANIYOR^. Family FRINGILLID^. ( Botiaparte.J Genus Frixgilla. f Linnceus.J Generic Characters — Beak short, strong, convex, straight, and conic; superior mandible dilated, slightly bent at the point; the upper part depressed. Nostrils basal, round, placed near the forehead, behind the horny elevation of the swollen part of the beak, partly hid by the feathers of the forehead. Tarsi shorter than the middle toe. The two or three first wing primaries tapering, the third or fourth the longest. CEIMSON-WINGED GEOSBEAK. Fringilla coccotJiraustes plimiicoptera. Fringilla rliodopfera, Montifringilla sanguinea, Ergthrospiza phcenicoptera et Rhodopechgs phcenicoptera, Rhodopechys phcenicoptera, “ phcenicoptere. Lichtenstein. Gould. Bonapahte. Cabanis. Loche. Specific Characters. — Top of the head in the male black; the first two-thirds of the outer web of aU the primaries, except the first, the feathers round the eyes, and the ujiper tail coverts, rich crimson. Length seven inches; carpus to tip four inches and three-tenths; tarsus ten fines; tail two inches and three-fifths; beak seven fines; circumference of beak at base one inch and a half. 90 C R ni S 0 X - A V I X G E I) G R O S 1 5 ]•: A K . Tins beautiful species is closely allied to tlie Desert Trumpeter, Pyrrhula githayinea. It has been included with it and Frinyilla obsoleta, by Liclitenstcin, in the genus Erythrosjnza, in which arrangement he was fol- lowed by Bonaparte. Subsecpicntly Cabanis placed this bird in a new genus, that of llhodopechys , in Avhich he was also followed by the versatile Prince of Canino. It differs, however, from the Bullfinches in the size and form of the beak, and belongs, I think, more strictly to the genus Coccothraustes , although here again the form of the wing is different. Bonaparte says of it in his “Conspectus Avium Europearum.” p. 28: — “This elegant Enythrosjnza phcenicoptera, which does not differ from the Frinyilla sanyiiinea of Gould, from the confines of Persia and Circassia, claims its place in the ornithology of Europe, which it can always ensure by a few movements of its wings. It is essentially sedentary, only changing from plains to mountains,” In addition to the above places, Erzerouin may be mentioned more particularly as a locality; in the neigh- bourhood of which place it is found in flocks of five or six. It occurs also in the southern parts of Africa. In its habits it very much resembles P. githayinea, living among rocks and stones in the desert, and feeding upon seeds. The male in breeding plumage has the top of the head black; the nape, back, scapularies, and wing coverts rich chesnut brown, checks, throat, and flanks, being a brown of a lighter shade. Wings black, with the first two-thirds of all the primaries, except the first, rich crimson, the secondaries being broadly tippled with very pure white; upper tail coverts crimson; tail black, with the exception of the most external on each CKIMSON-AVINGED GKOSEEAK. 97 side, 'wliich. are jiure wliite; all tlie other quills more or less tipped 'svitli white. The feathers surrounding the eyes crimson; the crop and abdomen fawn-colour, with the feathers covering the thighs white; under parts of the wings at the shoulders bordered with crimson; the rest of the upper part white, below slaty brown; tail, when closed, white, being covered by the two external feathers. Feet brown; beak yellow. The female has the upper part of the head brown, with all the other upper parts different shades of the same colour, only a slight vestige of the crimson colour of male being perceptible; the primaries and secondaries dark brown, the former slightly edged with crimson, aiad the latter tipped with dirty yellow. Throat, cheeks, crop, and flanks nutmeg brown; abdomen dirty-mottled white and brown. The figures of this beautiful bird are from specimens kindly sent me by Mr. Gould. The male is from Erzeroum. The female was also shot in the breedinar O season. 98 GRANIVOR^. Family FRIGILLIDJE. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Fkingilla. ( Linnceus.) SERIN Frinyilla Fringilla sertnus, Fyrrhula serinus, ii Serinus Jlavescens, “ hrumaHs, “ hortiilanus, “ meridionalis et islandicus, Serin Finch, Serin cini, Gemeiner grilngimpel or girlitz, VerzelUno, Raperino, Verdolini, Serino d' Italia, Crespolino, FINCH. sei'inus. Linnjeus. Temminck. ScHLEGEL. Degland. Keysebling et Blasius. Gould. Bonaparte. Strickland. Koch. Bonaparte. Latham; Syn., vol. iii, p. 296. Of the French. Of the Germans. Savi. Stor. Of the Tuscans. Specific Characters. — The back olivaceous, marked with longi- tudinal blackish spots; vertex pale olivaceous yellow; primaries and tail feathers dusky brown. Length four inches and a half; carpus to tip two inches and seven-eighths; tarsus nine lines; beak four lines. The Serin Finch is an inhabitant of Southern Europe. It is found plentifully in Spain, the south SEKTX FINCH, 00 of France, in Italy, Greece, in that part of Switzerland which borders on Italy, and more rarely in the south and south-west of Germany. It is also found in Central Germany, in the north of France, and in Holland; but Naumann says it is not found in the north of Germany. According to Faber, it has been found and killed between 66° and 6T° of north lati- tude. It has also been found in the Hertz Mountains, and, according to Bechstein, it is often seen in Thuringia. Dr. Leith Adams informs me that it is an autumn visitor at Malta, is common in Sicily, and very common at Smyrna. Xaumann remarks as worthy of notice that the Serin Finch is not equally plentiful in the same country, and Schinz writes to him that he has never procured it in the Canton of Zurich, though they are common a four hours’ journey out of it. They are said to be plentiful in the neighbourhood of Heidelberg and Offenbach, but in the country be- tv'een very rare. Count Miihle says it is very common in Greece, in company with Finches and Linnets, and that its colours are in that country very bright. Captain Loche includes it among the birds of Algeria; and Mr. Salvin (“Ibis,” vol. i, p. 313,) says that it is common about the olive-groves of Sousa, in the neigh- bourhood of Turin, but rare in the more elevated and mountainous parts of the Eastern Atlas. A special interest attaches to this bird in consequence of its having been recently captured in England, but as it has not hitherto been figured as a British bird, it comes into my list. The account of this capture will be found related by Mr. Bond, in the “Zoologist” for 1860, p. 7105. One specimen was said to have been caught in a clap-net on the 20th. of June, 1859, near Brighton; and a second near London, in October, 100 SERIN I'INCII. 1859, shortly after a severe storm. ]\Ir. Rowley also (“Ibis,” January, 1861,) alludes to other specimens having been taken near Brighton. Tho Serin Finch is generally a migratory bird, quitting its summer and breeding ground in October, and returning the following March; but in the mild climate of the Rhine, Naumann tells us it remains all the year round. It lives most frequently in fruit-gardens, orchards, or avenues of wallnut or nut-trees, and vineyards; more rarely in oak and beech woods, and loves to dwell among willows and alders, on the banks of brooks and rivers, as well as in garden-trees in the middle of villages or near buildings. Naumann, from whom I am now quoting, further remarks that wherever it lives in summer, it makes itself known by its restless habits, and its custom of always singing on the sum- mit of the tree tops, from which it often flies down to the roofs of buildings. In autumn it is more retired, but remains long on the thick tree tops. It seeks its food principally on the ground, on which account it is often seen there, but never very far from trees and bushes, and still less in the open fields. It does not seem to like fir or pine woods. In its movements it is very lively and active, springing from branch to branch, very much like the Siskin or Common Linnet, and it willingly associates with these birds, particularly the Siskin. They arc generally seen in pairs or small flocks, and the pairs do not seem to separate during the whole year, but “cling to each other with the utmost affection and tenderness.” If one is accidentally separated from the other, they call assiduously until they are again united. The male is very lively in the beautiful spring SERIX FINCH. 101 weather, and sings continually from the tops of the trees, and delights especially in flying from one to the other, sometimes soaring and sometimes fluttering aloft, and flying straight down again like the Tree Pipit. In its usual flight it resembles the Siskin, moving quickly from place to place, and uttering its peculiar note, which has been compared to that of the Siskin, the Goldfinch, and Canary-bird. The song has much variation, and may be heard at the breeding-place all day long, and from March till far into August. It is a favourite cage-bird, assorting by choice with Siskins, Goldfinches, and Canaries, and it may, like these birds, be taught many performances. Like other Finches, the Serin feeds on seeds, es- pecially those grown in gardens, and it prefers the oleaginous to the farinaceous. Naumann mentions par- ticularly cabbage, hemp, and poppy, rape, turnip, radish, and lettuce seed, for which it lays contributions on the cultivator, and for which it is doubtless often shot and trapped. The wild seeds which it seems to prefer, are dandelion, hawk cabbage, chicory, the grasses, and even, v/hen driven to it, oats. In autumn it seeks its food among the alders and birches. Its nest is much more frequently found on fruit and walnut-trees than on beech, oak, or alder. It is in position more like the nest of the Goldfinch than the Linnet, placed in a forked bough, not very high, or in the lowest branches; in bushes and dwarf fruit trees, but not in low bushes. The nest is sometimes like that of the Goldfinch, at others more like the Greenfinches, but smaller, very narrow, rounded, and lined with more skill than the latter. It is formed of small roots, woven together with old twigs, which are however, sometimes wanting. The inside is tolerably VOL. III. 10^ SKKIN FINCH. deep, and made soft and warm witli feathers, and generally a large quantity of horse-hair, and single pigs’ bristles, which secure a smooth resting-place for the eggs, and make, as Naumann justly remarks, one of the prettiest of nests. The eggs are about the size of the Siskins’, but shorter and rounder, very tender-shelled, and in colour resembling the Linnets’, having a ground of greenish white, with solitary dots and short streaks of a dull or dark blood red, or reddish brown, forming a kind of wreath oftentimes round the larger end. They sit fourteen days, and this duty is performed entirely by the female, while the male often feeds her most tenderly from his crop. The late lamented Mr. Edward Tuck, of M^allington ilectory, near Baldock, Hertfordshire, who took a great interest in the progress of my work, wrote to me an account of his observation of this bird in the south of France, and promised to send me the nest and eggs. The fatal disease, however, which took him to the sunny climate of the south of France, has since then terminated fatally; and it is with a melan- choly interest I record an extract from one of his letters, which displayed not only considerable knowledge of natural history, but powers of observation, which would, had he been spared, have done much good to the science, in the pursuit of which he w'as so fond. The letter is dated June 15th., 1859; — “I have lately returned from Cannes, where I passed several months of the winter; but I am sorry to say have met w'ith very little indeed in the ornithological way. . . .Provence is generally a very dry and barren country, and you only find birds in the valleys, on the borders of streams. With regard, however, to the SERIN FINCH. 103 Serin Finch, F. sermus, I found that some wintered in Provence. I heard the song two or three times in December, and obtained a sjiecimen in January. They begin to sing again about the middle of February. By the middle of March their numbers had greatly increased by arrivals, and they were extremely abundant all along the edges of the pine Avoods, Avith Avhich all the higher ground of the country is coA’ered. They evidently frecjiuented the borders of culti\mted ground more than the interior of the Avood. The males Avere then in full song. From the middle of March the numbers gradually lessened till there were only some pairs left here and there breeding. ^‘They build chiefly in gardens, more so than in pine Avoods. The nest is ahvays on a pine or cedar, from six to sixteen feet from the ground. On the 14th. of April I saAv some young Serins out of the nest, but they could not flyj and on the 26th. I took a nest containing only tAvo fresh eggs. On my way home, I stayed some days at Fontainebleau. I cer- tainly did not hear these birds there, though the gardens round the palace seemed suitable for them, and I AAms sheAvn the skin of one said to have been ob- tained there. The Serin Finch is not found in Madeira. I have seen it at Cintra, near Lisbon, in June, but they are never numerous there then.” In Badeker’s Avork upon European eggs, I find the following remarks about this bird by Brehm: — “The Serin Finch inhabits the south of Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa. In Germany it removes in a remarkable manner toAvards the north. I saAv it at Nuremberg in 1130, and for three years at Jena and Dresden. It comes into the south of Germany during the first fortnight in April. The half-boAvl-formed 104 SERIN FINCH. nest is made of grass and stalks of plants, and lined ivitli feathers and hairs. INIany also use the catkins of the willow upon the under layer, Avhilst others are made almost entirely of rootlets, and some build almost exclusively of the clustering blossoms of the chesnuts. It lays in May five eggs, which are similar to those of F. citrinella in size and markings. The ground- colour is pale green, having at the narrow end faint reddish grey spots, in the middle brown, Avhile, at the greater end, the small streaks and dots are black broAvn.” Savi’s interesting account does not differ from those I have given. It appears in Tuscany in flocks in April. The male in breeding plumage has all the upper parts olivaceous, Avith longitudinal black markings; the vertex, throat, crop, and an imperfect collar round the neck, greenish yelloAv; the nape mottled yellow and olivaceous; the lower part of the body and flanks dirty whitfe, the latter being marked Avith longitudinal broAvn s^iots. The wings are crossed Avith tAVO narroAV yellowish Avhite bands. Primaries and tail quills broAAUi, bordered lightly with dirty white; the rump is clear canary yelloAv; beak horn brown above, whitish below; feet and iris broAvn. In autumn the colours are less pure. The female has less yelloAV in its plumage than the male, more black above, and more broAvn spots below. Before the first moult the young are variegated Avith grey and yellowish, Avith elongated broAvn markings. My figures of the bird and its egg are from speci- mens kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram. The bird lias also been figured by Bufibn, pi. enl. 658, (male;) Roux, Ornith. Provence, pi. 94, (male and female;) Boutcil, Ornith. du Dauph., pi. 34, fig. 4; SElilX FI^X•II. lOo Gould, B. of E., pi. 195; Tcmminck, Atlas du Manuel; Vieillot, Galerie des Oiseaux, pi. 62, et Faune Franc., pi. 38, fig. 1; Naumann, Vogel Deutsch., vol. v, pi. 123. 10(3 GKANIVOil^. Family FRINGILLID^. f Bonaparte.) Genus Fringili.a. f Linnceus.) CITKIL FINCH. Fringilla citrinella. Fringilla citrinella, “ alpina, “ hrumalis, Serinus citrinella, Chlorospiza citrinella, Cannahina citrinella, Citrinella serinus sive alpina, Venturon ordinaire, Le Venturon de Provence, or Gros hec Venturon, Gemeiner Citronenjinic, Venturone, Linna;us. Temminck. SCOPOLI. Bechstein. Boie. Kaup. Degland. Bonaparte. Oe the French, Of the Germans. Savi. Specific Characters. — Vertex and back green; nape grey. Pri- maries all tipped witli ash; first and third primaries of equal length, and the longest in the wing; tail much forked. Length four inches and four fifths; carpus to tip of wing three inches; tarsus seven lines; beak four lines; tail two inches and three tenths. The Citril Finch is very common in the south of Europe — in Greece, Turkey, Italy, the shores of the Mediterranean, and in Provence. It is found acciden- CITRIL FINCH. 107 tally only in Germany and tlie north of France, and, according to Temininck, never in Holland. It is by no means a rare bird in Spain, nor in Switzerland. It leaves Germany and Switzerland in October in flocks, and returns in March or April. It is also found in those parts of Asia and Africa which abut on the European border. Captain Loche says it occurs only accidentally in Algeria. Thus limited to the southern parts of Europe, the Citril Finch is nevertheless a true Alpine bird, living not only among the smaller hills, but frequenting the highest Alpine mountains as far as the arboreal region extends. It is found, says Naumann, in the upper dark forests Avhich are broken here and there by open plains overgrown with grass, and rocky precipices. Count Miihle says it is rare in Greece everywhere except in the mountains. The following account of its habits is from Naumann: — It is a cheerful restless little bird, very active in its movements, and somewhat shy. It seems always full of joy, and is constantly heard even in bad weather, or in the middle of alpine snow and storms. It is never known to stay long in the same place; and appears in constant motion, turning its tail from side to side, hopping or fluttering among the boughs of the trees, or on the earth when it seeks its food; its spring is quick, its deportment fearless. In all this its affinity with the Siskin is remarkable. It resembles it also in its flight, especially that of passage. It seems alike indifferent to weather or temperature, and only departs from its mountain home, when the ground is frozen, and there is a deficiency of food. Its note is a gentle piping, described by some as ^gu,’ by others as ‘qjiul’ or ‘qjiub.’ This call is 108 crniiL Fixcu. heard frequently as it flics or immediat('ly after settling. The song of the male is variously described. Bechstein compares it to that of the Canary bird, but says it is not so shrill — something between a Canary bird and Tree Pipit. Schinz compares it to the song of the Siskin. It is really a loud, clear, pleasant song, which may be constantly heard at the breeding-season, from March to September. The female also sings a little, but not so loud as the male. Many agreeable qualities combine to make the male Citril Finch a favourite cage-bird, and it is kept by amateurs in great numbers. It becomes domesticated quickly, is easily tamed, and not difficult to keep even for a long time. It feeds principally on the seeds of firs or pines, and on those of many alpine plants, and also destroys buds and blossoms, though probably it docs this, like the Goldfinch, in search of insect larvee. In confinement it is fed, like other Finches, on poppy or hemp seed, but with the last it gets too fat, and it must not consequently be made its principal food. It nests in the mountains of the countries above named, in the Tyrol, and in many places in Switzer- land on the southern Alpine chain. The nest is sometimes placed in the thick stumpy alpine firs or other 2:)ine trees, sometimes under the roofs of the herdsmen’s cottages. It is cup-shaped, and very well and skilfully woven together. It is made of dry grass, with moss and twigs more or less intertwined, is tolerably smooth on the outside, and very beautifully lined with many hairs of various animals, small feathers, and husks of the poppy. The eggs are four or five in number, and in form and colour very similar to those of the Goldfinch. t I r / \ i CITRIL FINCH. 109 They are, however, much smaller. The ground-colour greenish blue, with variously-sized dots of reddish grey and blood red, chiefly at the larger end. According to M. Crespon, it will breed with the Serin Finch. The male in breeding plumage has the top of the head and back olive green; nape and sides of throat grey; rump, throat, and all the under parts citron yellow; wings and tail dark brown; the primaries lightly and the secondaries broadly tipped with ashy white; two oblique bars of olive green across the wings. Beak brown; feet reddish; iris clear brown. The female has the plumage browner, with less of yellow below, and the wing bars are whitish. According to Degland the young before the first moult have the upper parts of a russet grey, with a longitudinal black spot in the centre of each feather; the inferior parts russet white, with a number of brown spots, distinct, but less pronounced on the middle of the abdomen; wings of a blackish grey, with the coverts broadly bordered and tipped with light yellow ochre, forming two transverse bands, one on the middle, the other on the lesser coverts; pri- maries brown, bordered and tipped with grey; tail quills equally brown, bordered and tipped with ashy white. My figure of this bird is from a specimen sent me by Mr. Tristram. The egg is from Thienemann. The bird has also been figured by Temminck, Atlas; Vieillot, Faune Franc., pi. 40; Roux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 90, (male;) Naumann, Vogel Deutsch., pi. 124; Bouteil, Ornith. du Dauph., pi. 35, f. 3; Gordd, B. of E., pi. 198. Q VOL. III. no GKANIVOEJ^. Family FRINGILLID^. f Bonaparte.) Genus Fringilla. f Linnceus.J SNOW FINCH. Fringilla nivalis. Fringilla nivalis, “ saxatilis, Passer alpicola, Plectrophanes frinyilloides , Chlorospiza nivalis, Montifringilla nivalis, Pinson de Neige des Alpes, Alpen Schneejink, Beisson. Koch. Pallas. Boie. Kaup. Brehm. Bonaparte. Of the French. Of the Germans. a Specific Characters. — Wing coverts, tlie chief part of the secondary quills, and all the tail feathers with the exception of the two middle ones of a pure white. Length six inches and two fifths. The Snow Fincli is an inhabitant of the highest mountains of Southern Europe, namely, — Switzerland, south of France, the Pyrenees, the Appenines, and the Caucasus. It is found also in the Tyrolese Alps, and occasionally, while on its passage to the north, in Thuringia and Anhalt. In the north of Europe it is rare. It has, however, been taken in Sweden ac- SNOW FINCH. Ill cording to Nilsson, thoiigli he only mentions a single capture: and it is equally rare in Siberia. It occurs in the high mountains of Persia, and is found in North America. Dr. Leith Adams informs me that it is common about Candahar, so that it has a wide and extensive range. In Switzerland it is found in the highest mountains in the regions of everlasting snow, descending to the lower parts only when driven by storms; and in the spring of the year it is found in the higher alpine valleys. In summer it still prefers the most desolate places, where it is seldom disturbed by its enemy man; such as the Usfernthal, the desert regions of the Gumsel and the Simplon, and in the neighbourhood of the convent of St. Bernard, where it is found all the year. Naumann, from whom my account is principally taken, says that the Swiss naturalists consider there are two species or permanent varieties, one living ahvays in the Swiss mountains, the other in the south of Germany; hut he does not agree with this opinion, considering the idea has originated in the well-known migratory habits of the bird. The Snow Finch lives during summer, and in a great part of the year where no trees grow ; it is therefore seen on the ground, stones, and walls or roofs of buildings. It is a cheerful, restless, and vigorous bird, resembling in its habits the Mountain Finch and Chaffinch, and like them it runs and hops on the ground, and has a similar flight, in which its beautiful plumage is well displayed. It is generally considered a very shy bird, hut the Swiss naturalists say that in their mountains it is less wild, though ever cautious. It is sociable with its kind, and is seldom seen alone, except during the breeding-season. When 112 SNOW FINCH. startled, it flies up high in the air, and seems to go far away, hut it usually makes a circuit and returns to the same spot, where it settles upon the ground. Its call, which is heard during flight, is a pe- culiar piping, short, broken note, comiiarcd by Schlnz to the syllables ‘tri, tri, tri.’ Bechstcin says that its call is a loud and clear ‘kip, kip,’ like that of the Crossbill. It will also in confinement sing the notes of the Mountain Finch, and is not easily tamed. It lives upon seeds and insects, preferring of the first those that are oily, and of the latter beetles and grasshoppers, moths, etc. In winter its food is by necessity confined to the seeds of alpine plants — fir and pine trees, and, like our Sjiarrows and Finches, it may he seen feeding among the dung of horses, and it Avill even in inclement seasons venture into the cloisters of St. Bernard to pick up grains of rice or anything it can get. Schinz tells us they are always in good condition, and very fat in summer. In con- finement they will do well on rape and hemp seeds, but will also eat those of the fir, which they seem to like much. They also feed upon the seeds of several grasses. The Snow Finch breeds only in the highest regions of the highest mountains, where the growth of wood has ceased, and near those dreary and desolate spots where the snow has never melted since the mountain was upheaved from the bowels of the earth. Yet it hath pleased Him, without whose knowledge not a Sparrow falleth to the ground, to locate here one of the most beautiful of His created things; and as the weary traveller seeks among these wild and inhospitable regions the records of a past history in the world — and is full of that deep and indescribable feeling which SNOW FINCH. tlie sublimity of such a solitude creates M'ithiu his miud — he is charmed and delighted by the chirp or the flutter of this lonely denizen of the Alps, which proclaims to him by its presence there — by its adapta- tion to its existence — by its distinct individuality — that it had a special creation and a special position assigned to it in the great scheme of nature. The nest of the Snow Finch is placed on the rocks, between stones, in fissures of the rocks, or in holes, as well as in the balconies and under the roofs of the hospitals of the great St. Bernard and the Simplon. It begins to build in May, and' has probably only one brood in the year. The nest is made of dry grass, stalks, and moss, and lined inside with feathers or hairs. It contains from four to five eggs, which are very similar to those of other Finches. The ground- colour is bright greenish, with ashy grey and dark green or brown irregular spots and dots. The young are fed upon insects, and are taken off into the snow, even to the highest regions, by the old birds. The male in breeding plumage has the top of the head and neck of an ashy colour, running into bluish; back and scapularies brown, shaded with russet on the borders of the feathers; upper tail coverts partly white and partly black, with their edges russet; the inferior parts are white, washed with ash on the crop and neck, with a large black spot on the throat; abdomen white; under tail coverts white, with some brown spots at their extremity. Wings black, with a large white longitudinal band formed by the wing coverts and the greatest part of the secondary quills; the primaries bordered on the outside, and tipped with russet grey; the two middle tail feathers black, bordered with VOL. III. R 114 SNOW I'lNC’H. nissct grey; the others white, tipped with u slight black spot bordered with russet; the most external feather on each side entirely white; beak black; feet and iris, brown. In autumn the colours of the male arc browner above, the black mark on the neck less extended, and the borders of the feathers which form it ashy; beak yellowish, and the feet of a darker brown. The female does not differ from the male, (;xccpt by the ash-coloured head, which runs into russet, and the absence of the black mark on the neck. The young before their first moult are above and on the sides of the head and nape of an ashy brown, with the feathers broadly bordered wdth russet; back and scapularies brown, with the feathers bordered with red; front and sides of the neck ashy white; cro]3, ab- domen, and under tail coverts of a russet white ; the white feathers of the wings and tail, washed with an ochreous red on their borders; the black feathers of the same parts bordered and tipped with russet; beak saffron yellow; feet russet brown. — (Degland.) Figured also by Buffon, Brisson, Wilson, Temminck, etc. By Roux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 89, (male in winter plumage;) Bouteil, Ornith. du Dauph., pi. 35, fig. 1; Naumann, Vogel Deutschlands, pi. 117; Gould, B. of E., pi. 189. 115 GKANiyOR.E. Family FFINGILLIDFE. ( Bonaparte. J Genus Fringilla. f Linnceus.) ALPINE SEEIN FINCH. Fringilla pusilla. Fringilla pusilla, Passer pusillus, Serinus “ Pyrrhula pusilla, Moineau des Alpes, Alpensperling , Gmelin. Pallas. Brandt. Bonaparte. Uegland. De Selts. Of the French. Of the Germans. Specific Characters. — Bump grey, spotted with blackish; abdo- men dirty white; primaries boi’dered with yellow in the adult, and with white in the young. Length about four inches and a half. — Degland. This species is said by Pallas to be common in the Caucasus and tbe borders of the Caspian Sea, to which it goes in spring from the high mountains in common with Fringilla nivalis and Sylvia erytlirogastra, which come down in winter from the alpine regions of Persia. The following is the description given by Pallas; — “Forehead testaceous red; vertex black. Neck and back grey, Avith the middle of the feathers fuscous; abdomen and under tail coverts Avhite. Feet black; beak fuscous.” 116 ALPINE SEKIN FINCH. The above description is thought by De Sclys-Long- champs to apply only to the young in the winter plumage. In the “Revue de Zoologie” for 1847, page 120, this distinguished naturalist has given the following more extended diagnosis of the adult bird: — Top of the head, auditory region, and throat, of a dull black, with the forehead of a bright and lively red; nape, upper parts of the body, and upper tail coverts, grey; the centre of the feathers blackish, having the borders of a saffron yellow or grey white ; the parts below dirty white, with longitudinal blackish spots on the flanks and under tail coverts, the whole irregularly washed Avith saffron yellow ; wings blackish, the lesser coAmrts broadly bordered with saffron yelloAV ; primaries slightly bordered Avith this colour, and the secondaries with grey white; tail blackish, Avith the end lightly bordered with grey white; beak brown; feet black. Figured by Pallas, Zoog., 1811-31, vol. 2, p. 28. I have not a specimen or good drawing of this bird, Avhich I therefore am sorry to say cannot be figured. r ]iO,L BOLL’S Ki;DiOLj^. 117 GRANIVOR^. Family FRINGILLIDJF. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Fringilla. (Linn •*' '■ ^ -mi'-. 4k • « » ••K('K Eli. SjjecT/ic Characfo's. — Plumage green, ■with the top of the head grey and the forehead crimson; only the middle feathers of the tail having transverse bands across them. Length from tip of beak to end of tail eleven inches; from carpal joint to tip of wing five inches and a half; tarsus one inch; middle toe and claw one inch and a quarter; tail four inches; beak one inch and a half. This bird^ with which I commence tlie interesting family of Woodpeckers, is essentially an inhahitant of the northern parts of Eurojie. It occurs in Nor- way and the north of Sweden, being only found in the southern parts of this country accidentally. It also occurs in Eussia and Finland, but Mr. Wheelwright informs me that it has not been observed by the S'svedish naturalists in Lapland. It is sometimes found in Swutzerland, near Zurich, and occasionally in France, but never, according to Temminck, in Holland. It is found accidentally in Denmark. It is rare in the south of Germany, hut in the north is more plentiful than P. viridis. It is in this country (Germany) a bird of passage, leaving in October, and returning to breed in March. It is mentioned by Count Miihle and Dr. Lindermayer among the rarer birds of Greece. Ac- cording to Temminck it is also found in America and the north of Asia, but it is not included in Bonaparte’s list of the birds of the former; nor is the latter given as a locality by the same or other modern authorities. I am indebted to Naumann’s “Naturgeschichte der Vogel Deutschlands” for most of the information con- tained in the notices of this and the following species of Wodjiecker. In winter the Grey Woodpecker chooses a locality for its residence which is solitary, and as much as possible unobtruded upon by man. Each bird seems to have its own hunting-ground, over which it roams VOL. III. u f.KKY AN OODl’KCK KK. MS regAilarly day by day. Tt is generally to be found on the same trees, and if it meets in its territory Avitli the Green Woodpecker, a battle royal is sure to ensue, in Avhich the former, being the Aveakest, ahvays gets the worst. We may therefore fairly assume, according to the DarAvinian code, that it is gradually becoming exterminated. But Ave have no evidence of this, nor any marks of a happily directed divergence of form in the Green Woodpecker to give plausibility to such a supposition. “The trees and bushes,” says Naumann, “about my residence are ahvays hunted over by a Green Wood- pecker, Avhich, Avhen driven away by a shot in autumn, is replaced by another later. Once a female Grey Woodpecker came Avithin the above hunting-ground in March; but it became restless, did not consort Avith the Green WoodjAecker, and called unto itself a mate. Another time a male Grey-head came and disputed the rights of territorial oAvnership with the Green. A terrible battle ensued, Avhich ended in the death of the intruder.” “For a number of years I haA^e knoAAUi a pair of Grey Woodpeckers inhabit a large Avood about tAvo miles from my residence. They prefer leafy trees to pines, and Avoods in grassy mountains Avell watered by riA'ers have more charms for them than the hill-side or the mountain forest.” The Grey AToodpecker, like our oAvn, loves to dAvell Avhere there are plenty of old oaks, beeches, aspens, or elms standing out in their oAvn solitary and pic- turesque beauty. It will remain in the same neigh- bourhood so long as it can obtain its favourite food — ants. AVhen they fail it takes its departure, and does not return. It is often seen on or about old avIUoav GKEY WOODPECKEK. 139 stumps near avoocIs. It also comes into tlie gardens of villages or toAvns in Avinter, but does not cling to buildings. It remains, Xaumann tells us, much longer, and is seen more frequently on the ground than the Green Wood]3ecker, and AA'hen frightened from thence, it Avill fly aAvay and suspend itself from a high tree, or take up its position on the top of the same, in Avhich it differs considerably from the Green. At night it takes refuge in the holes of trees, to Avhich it retires, like other Woodpeckers, Avith great caution in the late tAvilight. Naumann tells us that the Grey Woodpecker is a lAely, cheerful, and impudent felloAv; cautious and crafty AAuthal, but not so shy as P. viridis. It is very restless, and alAA^ays either seeking its food, or flying A^ery adroitly among the trees. It rarely, hoAA^ever, taps upon them like the “Woodpecker tapping” of our oAvn country, but it has equal skill in chiseling out holes for its nest or nightly habitation. It is A-ery quarrel- some and jealous about its food, and is not by any means to be allured from this by any artificial knocking or “tree tapping.” It is less shy in the breeding season, and more frequently seen on the tops of high trees than the other Woodpeckers, Avhere it sits crossAvise, sunning and pluming itself, and making its Avhereabouts easily discovered by its call. It flies like the Green species, and its A'oice is A'ery much the same, but rings in the ear more agreeably, AA'hile the tone is less shrill and sharp. It is beard from March to June, especially in the pairing season, and in the beautiful mornings of the bright sunny spring. The note consists of a full-toned syllable, ‘klii, klih, klih, klyh, klyh, kliik, kliik, kliik, kliik,’ sinking deeper each time, so that the end is much 140 GllEY WOODPECKER. fuller than the beginning thereof. The time is slower than that of the Green AVooclpecker, and the tone fuller and less sharp, and an observant car can easily distinguish one from the other. The male sometimes also makes a whizzing noise as it sits on a hard branch on the summit of a tree, violently hammering the same, so that the tone is brought out as ‘orrrr,’ but shorter than the other allied species. This noise is only heard in the bird under consideration during the pairing season, or when the female is sitting. The Grey Woodpecker lives principally upon ants, Avhen it can get them. When they fail it eats bark beetles, various larvEe, and, rarely, elderberries. Among ants, Formica rubra and fusca are its favourites, and the abundance of these insects generally determines the choice of a summer residence. The young are fed with the eggs or pupte. In summer it lives on no other food, and in winter it knows where to look for them. The nest is formed about the beginning of May, in the holes of trees, especially oak. They are not so careful in the choice of a situation as the Black or Green Woodpecker. It is generally in a tree easy to climb, and not very high up. The eggs are six in number, and very like those of the Green Woodpecker. They are, however considerably smaller, and more pear- shaped in form. The egg shell is of the finest grain — tender and thin, so that when fresh, the yolks shine through the peculiarly clear and enamel-polished white. This effect is destroyed by incubation. The male and female sit by turns, and are so fearless that they will almost permit themselves to be caught at this time. The young remain a long time in the nest, and are fed by the old ones some time after they leave it. G R K Y J< ) I) R K C K E R . 141 The Avhole family may be seen Hying about the forest together. iNIr. AVheelwright describes a freshly-killed male as follows: — Forehead carmine red; a black streak from the nostrils to the eye, and a similar one on the side of the throat from the nnder mandible. Head and neck ash grey, with small longitudinal blackish streaks or spots on the crown of the head. Back and wing coverts green; rump shining greenish yellow; all the under parts of the body jjale ash grey, with a faint green tinge. AVing feathers dark brown, with transverse white spots on the inner web, and similar, but smaller ones on the outer web. Tail feathers blackish green of one colour, with the exception of the two middle ones, which are marked with indistinct transverse bars. Beak thinner than that of P. viridis, bluish brown, having the root of the under mandible greeaiish yellow. Iris red; legs grey green. Length twelve inches; car- pus to tip six inches and one eighth; tail five inches. The female has no red on the forehead, which is replaced by small brown spots; the green on the back has an ashy grey tinge. The bird which I have figured is a young one of the year, sent me with the egg by Mr. MTieelwright, of Gardsjo, Sweden. The difference in dimensions are those between fresh and dry skins. It has also been figured by Edwards, pi. 65, (young male;) Naumann, Vogel Deutsch., pi. 133, (male and female;) Sepp. Hederl. Vogel, page 389, (female;) Stor, Degl. Ucc., vol. ii, pi. 177, (female;) Meyer, Vogel Deutsch., pi. 22, (male and female;) Boux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 59, (male and female;) Bouteil, Orn. du Dauph, supplement, fig. 4; Gould, B. of E., pi. 227. 142 ZYGODACTYLI. Family PICID^F. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Picus. ( Linnceus.) WHITE-EUMPED WOODPECKER. Picus leucoywtus. Picus leuconotus, “ leucotus, “ cirris, Pic varie a dos hlanc, TPeissruckiger Puntsprecht, Picchio vario iMassimo, Meyer and Wolff, 1810. Temminck, 1820. Bechstein. Pallas. Or THE Prench. Of the Germans. Stor. Specific Characters. — Plumage varied; the rump wliite, and the upper tail coverts crimson and white. Length ten inches and three quarters; from carpal joint to tip of wing five inches and a half; tarsus one inch; beak (upper mandible) one inch and two fifths; tail three inches and a half. The White-rumped Woodpecker is an inliabitant of the most northern parts of Euroj)e and Siberia. It is not rare in Pussia, Poland, and Prussia, extending through Esthonia, Courland, and Einland, It is some- times found in Silesia, and occasionally in the western and southern parts of Germany. One individual is recorded as having been shot in the Pyrenees, by M. WHITE-RUM PED WOODPECKER. U.s Ernest Delaybe. It is included in tlie birds of Greece, by Count Mlible and Dr. Lindermayer. Mr. AVheel- wright writes me word that it is spread over Scandi- navia, but appears to be more common in the midland districts. “They do not, however, breed with us, but in the thick fir forests of North Wermerland. It breeds also in Gothland, but is a rare winter migrant to Scania. It seems to prefer level tracts to stony rises. It is by no means shy, and often comes in winter about the wood fences round the houses; but in the forest it is generally seen high up on the top of dead trees. In manners and habits it resembles the Greater Spotted Woodpecker, and the cry is much the same. Nilsson says that they are seen generally in families in the autumn and winter. This I cannot corroborate. I never met, in our forest, in winter, more than two together, but if you shot one its partner was never far off. They breed very commonly in Smaland. It has not been identified in Denmark.” In Germany the White-rumped Woodpecker is both migratory and stationary. In the late autumn or winter it is found in the great forests, and comes thence into the neighbourhood of houses, fruit gar- dens, Gllages, or even towns, where it dwells very confidingly. On the wing it is very like our Greater Spotted Woodpecker, and its voice differs but little from that of any of its allied species. It feeds upon insects found under the bark, maggots, caterpillars, and other larvfe. Like the Grey Woodjiecker it is also very fond of ants and their eggs. Naumann says that one was shot in Silesia which was supposed to have been killing the bees from the hive, but, as none of these insects were found in the stomach, we may, I think. 144 WHITE-RUM RED WOODRECKER. fairly enter a verdict of “not guilty” on rliis count. The White-rumped Woodpecker bnilds, like its con- geners, in the holes of trees, particularly oaks. It lays four or five clear white shining eggs. Although I have specimens kindly sent me by i\[r. Wheelwright, I will let that gentleman speak for himself, as his descrijition is drawn up from birds recently killed. Male; length ten inches and three quarters; expanse of wing seventeen Inches; tail be- yond the wings. Head above, carmine red; forehead white, with a brown tinge. Around, and at the back of the eyes, a large white spot, and another below on the sides of the neck; throat white. From the under mandible a black streak extends backwards under the eyes, and becoming broader at the back of the ears, passes doAvn the sides of the throat to the breast. Breast white, with a greenish yellow tinge, and having, as well as the flanks, longitudinal streaks of black; belly and under tail coverts red. Neck above, top of back, and lesser wing coverts glossy black; the middle and lower part of back white; outer half of greater wing coverts white ; the secon- daries transversely barred with black and white, which arises from a series of white round spots, placed on the edges of each web at regular intervals, a sim- ilar effect being produced by the same means on the primaries, giving a barred appearance to the whole wing when closed. The first primary is about the same length as the sixth, and both are much shorter than the intervening four. Upper tail feathers and coverts coal black; the under ones cream-colour, bar- red with black, and becoming rufous at the tip. Iris nut brown ; beak horn blue ; legs lead grey. 'The female has the head glossy black above; fore- AVIIITE-RUMPEl) WOODPECKER. 145 licad wliite, ting-ed Avitli rusty brown. The rest like the male, but more didl. The colours of both, especially the male, brighter Avith age. My figures of this bird and its egg are from speci- mens sent me by Mr. M^heelwright, from Sweden. The bird has also been figured by Bechstein, JSaturg. Deutsch., vol. ii, pi. 25, figs. 1 and 2, (male and female;) Stor, Degli. Ucc., a'oI. ii, pi. 169, (old male;) Meyer, Vogel Dent., vol. i, pi. 11, (male and female;) Xau- mann, Vog. Deutsch., pi. 135, (male and female;) Gould, B. of E., pi. 228. VOL. III. X 14G /Y(U)lU(’TyLl. Family FICIUJE. ( lirissoa.J (Jernis Pk’US. fLinnams.J MIDDLE SPOTTED WOODPECKER. Ficus mcdius. Ficus meclius, “ varius, “ cynacdus, Fie vayie a tete rouge, Mittlerer Buntsjpecht, Ficchio rosso mezzano, LiNNiEtJS. Brisson. Pallas. Of the French. Of the Gtermans. Savi. Specific Characters. — Plumage varied; rump black; under tail coverts red; flanks rose-colour, with longitudinal streaks of black. Head carmine red in both sexes. Lengtb eight inches and a half; expanse of wing fifteen inches. Tail three inches and a half. The Middle Spotted TYoodpecker is found generally in those parts of Southern Europe, with the exception of Great Britain, which are inhabited by the Greater Spotted. In Sweden it is found in the south, and is even more common in Skania than its congeners Major and Minor. It is not found in Finland or Esthonia, but in Prussia Proper occasional specimens have been cajitured. It is very common in some parts of Germany, 0 T T O 0 D ^ MIDDLE SPOTTED WOODPECKEll. 147 and tolerably jilentiful in Switzerland, Italy, and France. It is plentifni in some parts of Siberia, and is met with all the year round in Denmark. It occurs only acci- dentally in Flolland. This species has been thought by some ornithologists to be the young or only a variety of Picus major. But they are very distinct both in ornamentation and habits. The female has the occiput and vertex red, as 'well as the male, 'w'hich is not the case with P. major. P. medius never remains long in pine woods, where P. major loves to dwell. It is a more active bird, and will adroitly avoid any disjmte leading to a fight with that bird; but it will give battle to one of its own species. Its voice is similar, but its call-note weaker. The Middle Spotted M^oodpecker dwells among the thickest foliage of the highest trees, particularly oaks, elms, and aspens. It is not often found on the ground, but like its congeners is generally seen paling trees, which it will ascend even to the top bough and perch there. Its habitation is in the highest hole it can find, and it will continue to use the same tree for years if not driven away. It is a most assiduous ‘Tapper,” and may often be seen on the under side of a decayed bough working away; the entrance hole turned towards the ground. It is a very handsome bird, perhaps the most so of all the European Woodpeckers. It is restless but not shy, and in pairing and breeding seasons very incautious. It can make good use of its legs in hopping on the ground, or from branch to branch. It has a whirring wavy flight, and appears on the wing a slenderer bird than its ally the Greater Spotted. Xaumann says that this bird will feed not only on insects but also upon many tree-seeds, and to assist in 148 :MII)DLE SrOTTEl) woodpecker. digesting- them it may be seen ]iiching np particles of gravel at the base of the tree. It is not content with the insects it finds under the hark, hut Avill split off entire pieces, and crush the rotten wood hcneatli into holes, in its search for wood-feeding larviP, such as S/rex, Ceramhyx, BostncJnis, Forficula, etc. It never seems to suffer for want of food during the winter; it is generally in good condition, hiit never fat. It is very fond of nuts, and will carry them like a Tomtit into the fork of some near tree, and crack them: it generally swallows tlie kernels Avhole, and will eat acorns and beech nuts in the same way. Naumann further tells us that it is a fruit-stealer, and will rob cherry trees, not so much however for the fruit pulp as the kernels of the stones, and that it will also split open fir-cones, and feed on the seeds when it cannot get better food. It does not affect the neighbourhood of water, is not often seen to drink, and still more rarely to bathe. Its stomach is larger than that of the other Woodpeckers. It nests in woods and sometimes in fruit gardens, which are overhung by woods of thick foliage. In the end of March or April they repair to their breeding places, which are easily betrayed by their restless habits and cries. Very soon (I am quoting Naumann) the male is seen chasing his mate from tree to tree, and among the boughs — or two males are observed having a battle royal — from which they frequently fly to swing from the highest summit of the trees. They now either call to their mates with a clear hri ght voice, or Avhirr against their rival. Their nesting place is thus easy to discover, as also the tree by the debris at the bottom, hut the hole is generally hid from view, and not so easily found. It is not often less than twenty feet from the ground, and very often as high as sixty feet. The MIDDLE SPOTTED WOODPECKER. 149 entrance hole is quite round, not larger than is actually necessary, and appeal’s from below so small that few people would believe it belonged to this bird. It is Avidcnccl inside in the form of a ball, and. extends clovriiAvards from the entrance seven to ten inches — seldom more. The eggs are laid, on fine Avood shavings under the Avails of the very prettily-Avorked entrance hole. They are generally five or six in number, sometimes seven. They resemble those of the Greater Spotted, but are much smaller, oAml in shape, tender shelled, and of enamelled whiteness. They are hatched in fifteen days, male and female sitting alternately, and the young, in Xaumann’s oAAm Avords, are “blind, ugly, helpless, thick- headed,” hawing, like other young Woodpeckers, a car- tilaginous knob upon the corner of the beak. When full fledged they fly round the tree in circles until they gradually separate into twos and threes. The old birds display great affection for their young. Mr. WhcelAvright describes the old male from freshly killed specimens as folloAA's: — Forehead grey; A^ertex and occiput carmine redi.. Throat, sides of the head, and neck, white, Avith a black band Avhich commences at the gape, and gradually broadening, forms a triangular spot on the side of the neck. Tack of the neck, back, and rump black; shoulders Avhite; wings black, Avith white spots in pairs on both Avebs of the primaries and secondaries ; breast vrhite, Avith a ^^elloAvish, and the belly AA'hite, with a reddish tinge, Avith longitudinal black streaks along the sides of both; under tail coA-erts car- mine red. The side tail feathers at the end AAdiite, Avith black transverse bands; the four middle feathers C|uite black; iris broAvn, encircled Avith a AA'hitish ring; beak shorter, more compressed and weaker than in P. 150 MIDDI.K srOlTKI) ’WOODPECKER, major ; Icad-colourcd at tlic root, bluish black at the tip. The female differs from the male only in having the colours of the head less bright, and the streak from the gape greyish and more indistinct. The young male much resembles the female. My figure of this bird is from Gould’s ‘‘Birds of Europe,” pi. 250; that of the egg is from Skania, Sweden, sent me by Mr. AVheelwright. This bird has also been figured by Buffon, pi. enl. 611; Vieillot, Diet., pi. 26; Roux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 61; (adult male;) Naumann, Vogel Deutsch, pi. 136, (male and female;) Sepp, ISTederl. Vog., vol. 4, pi. 637, (male;) Storr, deg. ucc., pi. 166, (male,) as Picchio vario sarto. Pious tridactylus, Linnaeus, Apterrus tridactylus, Swainson, Picoides Europceus, Lesson, Picoides tridac- tylus, Gray. — This bird has been described and figured by Mr. Morris, in his “History of British Birds.” I think its claims to be considered British very doubtful, but having appeared in the above work, it will not fall within the scope of mine. Mr. MTieelwright says of this bird, in a private letter, “It is scarcely so common anywhere in Sweden as any of the others; but in Lapland it is the commonest of all the species. It comes into Wermcrland in the winter, but does not I think breed with ns. It has never been seen in Skania, although it has once been shot in Denmark. It is not shy, and prefers level to rocky woods.” “In the winter all the Wodpcckers in our forests secrete themselves by day in holes of trees.” “In all the AToodpcclcers the colours appear to grow more distinct with age,” 1 Ordkr VI.— AXISODACTYU. Famihj CERTHIID^. (Bonaparte.) Genus SiTTA. ( Linnceus.J Generic Characters. — Beak straight, medium size, C3’lindrical, conic, double edged at the point. Nostrils basal, rounded, and partly hidden by hair and short feathers. Tongue short, pointed, and horny. Feet with three toes in front and one behind, the outer being joined at its base to the middle one; the hind toe very long, and armed with a long curved claw. Wings medium size; the first quill very short, the second shorter than the third or fourth, which are the longest in the wing. Tail composed of twelve quills, short, flexible, and square at the end. DALMATIAN NUTHATCH. Sitta Syriaca. Sitta Syriaca, Ehrenbekg. Bonaparte. “ neumayeri, jMichaelles. “ rvfescens, Gould. “ rupestris, Temminck; Man. 3, p. 287. Sitelle de Syrie, Of the French. Syrische Spechtmeise, Of the Germans, Specific Characters. — Flanks and under tail coverts russet, the latter not spotted with white; tail uuicolorous slaty blue, the most outward feathers slightly tipped with pale russet. Length six inches and two fifths; carpus to tip three inches; tarsus one inch; beak eleven lines. 15,? DALMA'l'IAX XU’!'1I A'lAMl. The Dalmatian Nutliatcli is an inhabitant of the conntry from nhich its Englisli name is derived. Passing along the shores of the Adriatic Ave find it in the Ionian Islands and Greece commonly. Thence avc trace it to Smyrna, and along the shores of Asiatic Turkey to Syria, where it is very common, that country also giving its specific and French name. Dr. Leith Adams informs me that it is pretty common in Affghanistan. The three European Nuthatches form an interesting illustration of the adaptation of structure to climate of nearly allied species. The present bird is very much larger and stronger than the European form. As will be observed farther on, its habits differ, inasmuch as it does not frequent trees, but rocks and ruins. The northern form and that which inhabits Britain are so closely allied to each other, that the best ornithologists have denied, and I think with good reason, their specific distinction. But the three birds have all a strongly- marked character in common. The coloration varies, but it is disposed after the same plan, the blue slate back, and the dirty white or russet abdomen, and the characteristic black mark on the side of the head of each. These are instances in Avhich there can be no objection urged as to the possibility, or rather the strong probability, of a common origin. But then we have no evidence of the stronger bird in the south, or the weaker one in the north, diverging into any different forms. The variation is adaptive and final, and the species or varieties are constant. “Few birds,” says the Bev. H. B. Tristram, in his account of the Birds of Southern Palestine, (Ibis, vol. i., p. 27,) “have interested me more than the Dalmatian Nuthatch. I had good opportunities of observing its habits in the south of the Morea in winter, and I DALMATIAN NUTHATCH. 153 encountered it again in tire liill country of Judoea. Unlike our species it is confined to tlie most barren and rocky regions, and runs up and down the stones Mutli wondrous agility, descending head downwards, and then by a sudden bound flying to the foot of the next rock, M^hich it climbs and runs down after the same fashion, searching the crevices as it goes for small beetles, with which the stomach of those I examined were filled. In summer and winter alike they were always in pairs, never (as Sitta Muropceci) in small flocks. The note is louder than that of our species, and much resembles the call of the Spotted Woodpecker.” The following account given by Lord Lilford, in his descriptions of the birds observed by him in the Ionian Islands, (Ibis, vol. ii., p. 232,) is somewhat different: — “Sitta Syriaca is common in certain localities in Epirus, particularly amongst the stony and precipitous hills near Santa Quaranta, where I have frequently observed it in small parties of five or six, flitting about and busily examining the holes and crevices of the rocks. It is a lively and restless bird, and has a note entirely dif- ferent from that of the Common Nuthatch. I never observed this bird to perch on a tree or shrub, but almost invariably found them on the most exposed and barren hill sides.” Mr. W. H. Simpson has also some interesting remarks about this bird in his “Ornithological Notes from Mis- solonghi and Southern vEtolia,” (Ibis, vol. ii., p. 289.) — “On the ojiposite side of the same stone was a nest of that most eccentric bird, Sitta Syriaca; it had been repaired once or twice, but at that period was not inhabited. The nest was plastered over the mouth of a small cavity, and, were it not for the little round entrance hole, would be very difficult to distinguish VOL. nr. Y 154 DALMATIAN NUTHATCH. from the numerous structures of a species of aut u-hicli are thickly stuck over the face of the rock, and at a distance resemble in size and appearance the nest of Sitta Stjriaca itself. But the greatest curiosity of all was to he seen under a large flat slab, which ju'ojectcd enough to afford convenient shelter during a shower of rain. This was a nest of Ilirimdo rufula, which had been broken at one end, and consequently abandoned by the bird. Meanwhile a Nuthatch had come and repaired the damage, possibly with the intention of appropriating the nest. The difference in the Avork- manship, and to a certain extent in the material, Avas very apparent Avhen taken in juxtaposition. In shape the nest of Hirundo rufula is so different from that of any other European bird, that this proceeding on the part of the Nuthatch Avas still more extraordinary.” I copy the folio Aving from Count Miihle’s ‘‘Beitraege Zur Ornithologie Griechenlands,” p. 50: — “This is a bird Avhich by many of our naturalists is only considered to be an acclimatized variety of the common 8. Europesa; but it is certainly a distinct species. It lives only on the rocks, never in Avoods, and remains Avillingly about old Venetian fortresses, Avhere it constantly glides in and out of the shot-holes. When it settles upon a rock, it likes to suspend itself Avith its head doAviiAvards, and hops off by fits and starts. It seeks its food on trees that are frequented by Coleoptera, such as the bread fruit, or Cactus opuntia. It builds its nest on the rugged rock Avails under the natural roof of an OA'erhanging rock, usually on the east or south side — never on the Avest. It is very large outside, and skilfully built Avith clay, eleven inches long from the entrance. It is lined Avith the hair of bullocks, dogs, goats, or jackals. It is alAvays on the outside Avoven together Avith the seeds F DALMATIAN NUTHATCH. 15-5 of Chnjsomela graminis and Triclwdes antiquus. It is usually so compactly made, that I was obliged to sepa- rate one with a chisel. This nest had been used many years. The bird is very lively, restless, and inquisitive. The young- are easily turned, and become very confiding; they may be fed upon bread crumbs, but in a cage remain always on the ground, and will not perch. The families remain long together, and the young are taught by their parents all about catching insects.” The following interesting account of the nidification of this bird is translated from the Italian of the Marchese Oratio Antinori, and is inserted in “Xaumannia,” for 1857, page 429; — ‘‘This pretty little bird enlivens with its cheerful note the highest and most lonely part of the Anatolian mountains, where it generally remains. Sometimes, however, it comes down into the plains, where it is especially seen on the rocks surrounding mountain tor- rents, or on the walls of old buildings. It builds its nest the last days of March, and the beginning of April; and for this purpose it chooses a rock or ruined wall, where among the projections it can be sheltered from the rain. It is easy to observe with what caution this bird makes choice of a locality, for before it finally resolves to build its nest in a jiarticular spot, it places some of the materials, which consist of resinous sub- stances mixed with feathers, hair, rootlets, thread, or wool, in several different places. This is evidently done to satisfy itself, not only that it may not be discernible to others, but that it may be impervious to wet, and sufficiently firm a foundation to last many years. Indeed it would be quite impossible to move the nest of Sitta Sgriaca from the place to which it is fastened, nor coidd it be distinguished from the parts to which it is attached. 15(5 DA T.M A T I A N N U'l' 11 AT( 'II. were it not that the dark shades of the entrance hole sometimes reveal its existenee. One which I recently found near the town of Magnesia, on a commanding rock, had a diameter of ten inches, and very nearly six in depth. The upper wall was three inches thick, and the sides and under Avail about four fifths of an inch, while the depth of the neck and entrance hole Avas tAVo inches. The Aveight of the Avholc Avas upAvards of five hundred drachms, (sixty-three ounces!) alloAving for that part of it Avhich I could not cut aAvay from the rock. It is quite clear that this bird cannot build every year a ncAV nest so large and heavy, but that it must last a long time, even for a whole life. Round the hole, Avhich is chosen for the building of the nest, and also over the nest itself, is a quantity of resin, Avhich is mixed Avith the other materials, and Avith earth. This resin it gets especially from Pistacea terebintlius and lentiscus. M"hen melted by the Avarmth of the sun, it runs doAvn and gives the nest a very firm hold of the rock, and Avill bear a great Aveight. llaAung mixed together feathers and fibres Avith clay and cement out of the Avater, to Avhich hairs and threads are sometimes added, it shapes its nest in the form of a flask, Avith a round opening of one inch and one fifth in diameter. The inside of the nest is more regular than the outside, but not A'ery smooth, both having throughout a granular surface, Avhich is covered by the small p>ieces of earth stuck one above another. The outer side differs also from the inner, in being coAmred Avith resin and a red sticky mass, perhaps taken from the poplar. When this is melted by the sun it not only makes the Avhole impervious to Avet, but makes it in appearance similar to the Avail on Avhich it is placed. It is not possible to examine this structure Avithout DA L ]M ATI A N N U T H A TC H . 167 being struck 'svitli its beauty and adaptation. The inside is lined with feathers, wool, and threads. It lays five or six eggs.” The eggs are larger than those of the Common Nut- hatch, four or five in number, slightly elongated, white, with pale brick-red spots, principally at the larger end. The male and female are alike in plumage. All the upper parts are of a slaty blue; the ends of the closed wings being rich hair brown; the throat, sides of the head, and chest white ; abdomen, flanks, and under tail coverts russet; from the angle of the jaws, through the eyes and ear coverts, and extending to the scapularies, is a distinctly defined black band; tail feathers brown, with their ends slightly tipped with russet. Beak and feet black. My figure is taken from a specimen shot on February 22nd., 1858, on Mount Taygetus, and kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram. The egg is from Thienemann. The bird has also been figured by Bonaparte, Faun. Itah, pi. 26, f. 2, and Gould, B. of E., pi. 235. I do not consider it necessary to give a figure of the Asiatic variety of SitUi Euroj^ceus , namely, S. Uialensis , Lichtenstein, S. sericea, Temminck, as I do not find any specific distinction between the two forms. S. Eralensis is found in the Caucasus and Siberia. By Pallas it was denominated S. EuropcBci, var. Sihirica. The only asserted difference given by authors is that the ffanks are not rufous, as in the Common Nuthatch. This is very much the same as making two human beings of different species, one of whom had flaxen and the other red hair. 15S ANISODACTYLI. Family CERTTIIID^F. (Bonaparte.) Genus Tichodroma. (Illiyer.) Generic Characters. — Beak very long, slightly arched, slender, cylindrical, angular at its base, and depressed at its point. Nostrils basal, naked, pierced horizontally, half closed by an arched membrane. Feet with three toes in front, the external attached at its base to the middle toe by a membrane; the hind toe carrying a very long claw. Tail round, with the shafts of the quills feeble. Wings with the first primary short, the second and third tapering, the fourth, fifth, and sixth the longest. WALL CHEEPER. Tichodroma muraria. Tichodroma muraria. Illiger. Koch. Temminck. Gmelin. Of the French. Of the Germans. Savi. alpina, plioenicopiera, Certhia muraria, Tichodrome echelette, Gemeiner Mauerldufer, Ficchio murajolo. Specific Characters. — Two round spots on the inner web of the first four true primaries, and one upon the fifth; the basal half of all the true primaries, except the first, and of the secondaries T ■/; A T. L CREEP K. n I "WALL CREEPER. 1.59 ricli crimson. Length six indies and a half; carpns to tip tiirce inches and three quarters; tarsus nine lines; hind toe and claw one inch; beak one inch and one fifth. This beautiful bird, so Avell known to the alpine traveller, is common in Switzerland, Spain, and Italy. It is a soutliern bird, frequenting tire rocky parts of tlie warmer countries of Europe. It is found in France and tire soutli of Germany, and is not rare in the highest Alps in the Tyrol. It occurs also in Bohemia and Silesia, and is included by Count Miihle among the birds of Greece, and hence it ranges to India, being mentioned by Dr. Leith Adams as occurring in Cashmere, by the sides of rivers and streams in rocky and precipitous places. It does not ajipear ever in flocks anywhere, being generally found solitary or in pairs. When the rough weather of autumn sets in, it is driven from the high mountains, and ajipears about the valleys and mountain towns during the winter months. In the spring it again gradually mounts up until it settles for breeding purposes among the highest rocks of the mountain top. AITierever it is seen, whether in mountain, or valley, or town, it is always found among rocks, running up and down their perpendicular faces, and peering into every nook, cranny, or cleft for its insect food. In its habits the Wall very much resembles the Tree Creeper, being lively, restless, and shy on the approach of man. It clings with great tenacity to perpendicular or horizontal rocks. It runs ujiwards with great dex- terity, but does not, like the Woodpecker, run down- wards. After a short rest it flies down from the top of even the highest towers, and then re-commences its upward ramble. It does not appear to use its tail as AVAL!- CllEEl'ER. 1()() a 2'^oint (Vajjjmi like its congeneric species, but goes Avitli a loAV spring from one rough spot to another, until it gets to the top, Avhen it flies clown again, and so on for a whole day. It "is not seen on the ground. Naumann tells us the Wall Creeper is unsociable and quarrelsome Avith its kind, and hence it is ahvays soli- tary. Even the young separate early. The call-note is said to be similar to the Bullfinch, and it has also a shorter note Avhen running up the Avails, in Avhich the short strophe di, didi, zaa, is often kept up with very little variation. Both male and female sing, and during the performance they raise their bodies, and move their Avings and tail, or flutter them upon the rocks. It feeds on insects and their larvae and eggs, spiders, ants, etc., all of which it pokes out of the crevices with its long curved beak. It builds in high places which are very difficult to get at — in chinks of barren rocks, or in the holes of Avails and old buildings or toAvers. Little indeed was knoAvn about the nidification of this bird until about ten years ago, when Nager-Donaziane, of Unsen-Thale, discovered the nest and eggs, and supplied his friends Avith specimens, of which a true description was first given by the Baron V. Konig, in “Cabanis’ Journal fur Ornithologie,” for 1855. The nest is built of an underlayer of soft dry stalks, mixed Avith moss, hair, soft feathers, and avooI, and is lined Avith animals’ hair. It lays from three to five eggs in June, AAdiich are either pear-shaped or more generally OAml. The shell is slightly shining Avhite, Avith small red or flesh-coloured spots and dots, AAdiich are most numerous at the larger end. They are about the same size as those of the d^^ryneck. The male in breeding plumage has the top of the 9 ^ ; 'I i i 1. vV A 1 L C A ; A' 3 R. NaT^.-',. - OH. 3. ill DDL 3 S POTT 3 O O D WALL CREEPER. IGl head, rump, and under tail coverts, blackish grey; Rape and back grey; checks, throat, and front of neck deep black; abdomen black; the under tail coverts tipped with white; wing coverts and basal half of the external web of the wing feathers of a deep crimson; the rest of the feathers blackish brown, with two large round spots on the internal web of the first four true primaries, and one on the fifth. Secondaries tipped with white; tail black, with the two most external quills broadly terminated with white, and the others more narrowly with grey. Beak, feet, and iris, black. The male in autumn and winter is of a distinct grey above, with a slight russet colour on the head ; the throat and chest white, slightly tinged with the same; the dark parts of the abdomen are less deep than in spring. The female resembles the male in winter plumage. The young of the year have the primaries and tail quills tipped with grey, and the colours above and below less pure than in the adult. After the first moult the two sexes and the young are alike in plumage. My figure is taken from a skin in autumn plumage, killed at Geneva, and kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram. The egg is fi'om a specimen sent by the same gentleman. The bird has been also figured by Buffon, pi. enl. 3T2, fig. i. male in spring, fig. ii. male in autumn, given as the female. Boux, Ornith. Prov., pi. 238 ; Bouteil, Ornith. du Dauph, pi. 3T, f. 4; Naumann, Vogel Deutsch- lands, pi. 141, male in summer and winter plumage; Gould, B. of E., pi. 239. VOL. III. Order VII.— ALCYONES. Fcwiihj MEROPID^. (Bonaparte.) Genus Merops. ( Linnceus.J Generic Characters. — Beak middle sized, sharp edged, pointed, and slightly curved, the summit elevated and entire. Aostrils basal, lateral, ovoid, and open, the opening hidden by having feathers directed forward. Feet with the tarsus short; of the three toes in front the most external is united up to the second articulation of the middle toe, and this with the in- ternal up to the first articulation; the hind toe broad at its base; claws — that of the hind toe the smallest. Wings — the first primary very short, the second the longest in the wing. BLUE-CHEEKED BEE-EATEE. Merops Persica. Merops Persica, “ Savignyi, “ Migyptius, “ siiperciliosus, Guepier Savigny, Guepier meridional, Sildlicher Bienenfresser, Blue-cheeked Bee-eater, Pallas; Voy., 1776. Cuvier. Swainson. Forskahll. PuprELL. Le Vaillant. Of the French. Of the Germans. SWAINSON. Specific Characters. — Throat yellow; upper part of neck anteriorly, russet red; upper plumage various shades of green; superciliary ridge and a band below the eyes turquoise blue. The I / (■ B I , II E - C H E E K E D ] { E E - E A '1' E R . l()S two middle tail feathers much longer than the others. Length from tip of beak to end of long tail feathers twelve inches; carpus to tip, five inches and three quartei’S; tarsus half an inch; beak one inch and three quarters; tail six inches. The Blae-clieeked Bee-eater is an inhabitant of Persia and Egypt, being found especially on the borders of the Caspian Sea. It extends along the shores of the Mediterranean Sea through Tripoli, Algeria, and along the Atlantic coast as far as Senegal ; while, eastward, it ranges, according to Dr. Leith Adams, into the north-west of India, where it is not unconnnon. As might be expected, it is occasionally found on the European side of the Mediterranean, where, however, it occurs only accidentally. It was introduced into the European list by Bonaparte, from two speci- mens which were killed in the neighbourhood of Genes. It is also included by Count Miihle among the birds of Greece, while Dr. Leith Adams informs me that it is found (but rarely) in that neutral territory, ]\Ialta. It is recorded (“Ibis,” vol. i, p. 2T,) by Mr. Tristram as occurring in the valley of the Jordan in Southern Palestine; by Mr. Taylor (ibid, p. 47,) as very abundant in small flocks in Egypt ; and Dr. Heuglin says it occurs in large flocks on the Somali coast of the Bed Sea. — (Ibid, vol. i, p. 340.) In its habits the Blue-cheeked Bee-eater resembles the better-known species in our own fauna, Merops apiaster. The male and female have the forehead marked by a white band; above the eye is a band of turquoise blue, with a similar one below, which is, however, slightly mingled with white feathers; from the angle 164 B L U E - C 1 1 E E K E D B E E - E A T E R . of tlie beak straiglit tbroogli tlic eye is a band of dark green. All the npper parts of the body green, more vivid on the rump, and from tlience shading off along the long tail feathers into green russet, while the tips are black. The win*- primaries dark green, with the most internal part of the broad inner web dusky brown, shading off into black towards the tip ; under wing coverts and flanks a rich chesnut, like the chest, while the rest of the under parts of the wing, and those of the tail, are glossy hair brown. Throat yellow, going off into a darker chesnut on the crop; sides of the neck, abdomen, and under tail coverts, vivid Scheeles green; beak black; feet horn brown. Temminck notices two varieties in his ‘‘Manual,” fourth part, 1840, p. 651. The var. A, are specimens from Senegal, which, he says, differ in some of the tints of the plumage, by having the two middle tail feathers longer, and by having shorter wings — differences which are seriously recommended to species makers. This variety has been figured by Bonaparte, in his “Fauna Italica,” and by Le Vaillant, pi. 6, bis. The other variety, B, which is that which I have figured, from Nubia and Egypt, has less blue in the green of the upper plumage, the middle tail feathers are rather shortei’, and the wings slightly longer, reaching near to the end of the lateral tail feathers. This is Le Vaillant’s Guepier, pi. 6. In my specimen, which was kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram, and marked “Egypt,” the wings, when closed, do not reach to within an inch of the end of the lateral tail feathers. There is still another variety, found in Japan, the Merops Javanicuni of Horsfield, which is, however, easily distinguished by its bright blue rump. According to Bonaparte, Merops Persica of Pallas BLaS-CHBEKBD BBB-BAT3E,, BLAOK-AND- WHITE KIN GB I 3 HSR. ] 5 1 A' E - ( : 1 1 E p; ] V !•: D U E E - E A '1' E R . 100 is clifFereiat from the Merops Savignyi of Swaiuson, a statement which it is impossible to admit for a moment. The bird I have figured is in all particulars precisely the bird described by Swaiuson as J/. Saxignyi, the Blue-cheeked Bea-eatcr, “Birds of ^Vfiica,” vol. ii, p. TT, ph T. Figured by IjC Yaillant, Hist. Xat. Promer, ph 0 et 6 bis; Swaiuson, Birds of Africa, vol. ii, ph 7; Bonaparte, Fauna Italica, ph 2o, fig. 1. ALCYOJ^ES. Family ALCEDINID^F. (Bonaparte.) Genus Alcedo. (Linnceus.) Generic Characters. — Beak long, straight, quadrangular, pointed, sharp edged, and very rarely depressed. Nostrils basal, lateral, obliquely pierced, and almost entirely closed by a naked membrane. Beet short, naked above the knee; three toes in front, the exterior of which is joined to the middle toe as far as the second articulation, and this with the inside toe as far as the first articulation. Hind toe broad at its base, and its claw the smallest. First and second wing primaries shorter than the third, which is the longest in the wing. BLACK-AND-WHITE KINGFISHEE. Alcedo rudis. Linn^us. Beisson. SWAINSON. Strickland. Boie. Bonaparte. Of the French. Of the Germans. Alcedo rudis, “ ispida. ex albo et nigra varia, “ ispida hicinta et hitorquale, “ cerylevaria, Ceryle rudis, Martin-pecheur pie, Geschdekter JSisvogel, Specific Characters. — Feathers of the occiput long and pointed; tail with a broad black band, tipped with white at its end; a broad black band across the crop, interrupted in the middle. Length from tip of beak to end of tail eleven inches and a half; -■ : : D - 7/ ±1 : T E X I N G F J S TI . BLACK-AND-WHITE KINGFISHER. 1()7 from carpal joint to tip of wing fivm incb.es and a half; tail two inches and a half; beak two inches and a half; tarsus one third of an inch; middle toe and claw one inch. This bird is only an accidental visitor to the European shores. It has been observed in Turkey, Greece, Italy, and Spain; generally near the coast, on the European borders of the Mediterranean. In Africa it is most plentiful at the Cape and in Egypt. Swainson considered the Senegal species as distinct, and described it in his ‘^Birds of Africa” under the name of Ispida hicmta, the Double-collared Kingfisher. It is found rarely, and only accidentally, in Algeria. One specimen only was seen by Mr. Tristram near Jordan, in Southern Palestine. It is stated by Mr. Taylor, in his Egyptian Beminiscences, (“Ibis,” vol. i, p. 47,) to be abundant all the way from Alexandria to the First Cataract. In Asia we find it occurring in Turkey, Persia, India, and China. In its habits it resembles the other Kingfishers. Mr. Taylor (Op. cit.) says it is very tame and familiar in Egypt. “The food seems to be entirely fish. I have often watched it hovering over a shallow pool of water, and every now and then darting down and catching fishes, sometimes as much as three or four inches in length. This bird breeds in holes in the banks of the Nile.” In the colony of Natal Mr. Gurney (“Ibis,” vol. i, p. 245,) informs us, that “it frequents the lakes and rivers near the coast; not found in the interior. This bird hovers over the water before darting down, and if not successful flies on further, and hovers again; having caught a fish, it flies to a bough or post to swallow it.” J5LACK-AXD- WHITE KINGFISHER. 1()8 Mr. Swinlioc also, in liis very interesting paper on tlie Ornithology of Amoy, (“Ibis,” vol. ii, p. 49,) says that it is “very common on the river, where it is to be found at all seasons; it poises on the wing at a lu'ight above the water, and drops suddenly down to catch its prey. I have however seen it strike obliquely, when flying close to the surface of the water.” Like other Kingfishers this bird makes a nest in the holes of banks of rivers, and lays four or five eggs, which are white, glossy, and nearly round. The plumage of the Black-and-AYhite Kingfisher is very difficult to describe minutely, as almost each feather, as Swainson remarks, is varied in a different manner. The male in breeding plumage has the crown of the head and its crest black, with longitudinal streaks of white; all the rest of the upper parts are a mottled black and white; primaries and tail black and white; the white line which springs from each nostril is “carried over the eye and ears, and is lost in the variegated feathers of the crest.” All the under parts are pure glossy white, with a broad belt of deep glossy black across the chest, narrowed or interrupted in the centre; the flanks thinly striped with black. The iris, beak, and feet black. According to Degland the female is rather less, has more white in the plumage, the black collar less extended, and sometimes there is a second, which may probably have caused Swainson to describe the Senegal species as distinct. He certainly gives no separate distinction of the sexes. Before the first moult, the white of the upper parts is less pure, with a number of black dashes; the black collar on the chest is only faintly indicated by BLACK-AND-WHITE WOODPECKER. 169 black spots; the beak is sensibly shorter than in the adult. ]\Iy figures of the bird and its egg are from specimens kindly sent me by Mr. Tristram. The bird is marked “Egypt, March, 1858.” It has been figured by Bufibn, pi. enl. 62, young, 716, adult male; and Gould, B. of E., pi. 62. 170 Order VIIT.— CHELIDONES. Family IIIR UNBINIT) ( Bonaparte.) Genus IIiruxdo. (lAnnams.) Generic Characters. — Beak very short, very much depressed, and broad at the base; upper mandible curved downwards at the point. Feet short, with three toes in front entirely divided, or united at the base only by a short membrane; claws much curved; wings long and pointed. ORIENTAL CHIMNEY SWALLOW. Ilirundo rustica, var. Saviynyi. Hirundo Savignyi, “ rustica orientalis, “ Cahirica, “ Fiocourii, “ Boissonneautii, Cecropis Savignyi, Horondelle de clieminie orientate, Ostliclie Fauchschwalhe, Leach. Stephens. SCHLEGEL. Lichtenstein; Cat., 1823. Audouin; Des. del’Egp., vol. 13. Temminck; Man. 3, p. 652. Boie ; Isis, 1828, p. 316. Of the French. Of the Germans. Diagnostic Characters. — Under parts of the body, from the crop to the base of the tail, of a dark chesnut. Length six inches ; carpus to tip four inches ; tail from base to end of lateral feather three inches ; tarsus five lines ; beak from gape to end of upper mandible seven lines. This ^^perinanent variety” of our English Swallow is found principally in Macedonia^ Egypt, and Eastern ORIENTAL CHIMNEY SWALLOW. 171 Siberia. It is very coninion in Egypt, bat is only found accidentally in Europe, — Spain and Greece being the localities noted by Temniinck, Miihle, Lindermeyer, etc. Professor Blasius, in “Nauniannia,” 1859, p. 254, has a paper upon this bird, which I will transcribe nearly entire, as it not only expresses all we know about it, but contains some useful remarks upon the difficult question of ‘^species.” — “At a meeting in Cothea we learned through Olph- Gaillard, that H. Cahirica, Licht., was taken by Xager-Donazians, at St. Gothard, and the specimen was exhibited. Later Laudamman Nager ■wrote to me' that this is there the only Chimney Swallow, and that during the spring passage it is sometimes caught by boys with the hand. I also received specimens which did not differ in intensity of colour from African spechnens. We may reasonably express surprise at an Egyptian species coming to St. Gothard, particularly so regularly according to Andermatt. In the following spring Baldamus found this bird breeding and pairing with H. rustica in Diebzig, and I have one of these specimens now in my possession. In the jjresent spring (1859) I have also seen these Swallows breeding in Brunswick, and paired -with the common II. rustica. Many specimens were brighter than the Egyptian H. Cahirica; otherwise they resembled them. From other sources I have received intelligence that among Chimney Swallows individuals with red brown under sides have been found breeding. Under these circumstances can still affirm that this bird has been taken at St. Gothard; but it is not so clear that it is the only kind of Chimney Swallow which is found there. Dr. Glbger says that the very dark red House Swallow is very common in Sardinia, 172 orip:ntal chimney swat, low. and also in Eastern Siberia, where, according to Pallas, the Chimney Swallow has a remarkably rnst-coloured under side. As the different coloured birds pair together, and as in the same nest there are to be found from normal coloured parents — both colours — it is evident that the varieties blend one with another, and as there is very little difference in the forms and habits, so it is not well to maintain that there is a difference of species. But how is this question to be view^ed? For example as to climatic varieties? Our northern climate has under some circumstances produced the African form! No one can satisfactorily maintain that our northern dark rust-coloured Chimney Swallow was originally bred from the African! Nor can any one connect the one in the climate of Egypt with that in Eastern Siberia; far less can we deduce from the casual fact of the varieties pairing together, that the rust-colour of the Egyptian or Siberian Chimney Swallow is due to physical causes. The name climatic variety is only an arbitrary distinction.” ‘‘Or races? But races can only be comprehended with certainty within the same limits as climatic varieties. Pdie young will without any intermediate form go back to that of the parents. Nature does not carry out this idea precisely.” “Perhaps sub-species? The comprehension of sub- species is so little established in theory, and is so variably demonstrated in practice, that it gives no bounds to capriciousness.” “In short, are local forms one and the same species? But is not that a name without all philosophical or physiological consideration? Perhaps all the better if philosophy or physiology stood on weak ground. A distinction founded on fact is at least remembered by ORIENTAL CHIMjSEY SWALLOAV. 173 a matter of fact.* Would it not be advisable to make this matter of fact certain before Ave dispute about an idea? To do this Ave must knoAv Avhere the white and rust-coloured SwalloAvs are known to dAvell distinctly. Hoav far, and in Avhat statistic relation, the one form extends into the territory of the other, and in Avhat relation there is a proportion betAveen the two forms. We might then help each other to solve this riddle, and then we shall have no difficulty in being certain about the name.” This paper I think clearly establishes the fact of the identity of the v'ariety Avhich is the subject of the jiresent notice Avith the Chimney SavrUoav. They breed together. Their habits and nidification are similar. They only differ in the colour of the abdominal plumage, in having a brighter black on the back, and perha^is a broader black collar round the neck. The specimen sent me by Mr. Tristram, Avhich I haA'e figured, and the measurements of which I have given in my diagnosis, Avas killed in January, 1860, in Egypt, by AV. C. P. Medlycott, Esq. The plumage aboA^e is glossy black ; beloAV dark chesnut, Avith a broad black collar round the neck. Each of the tail feathers has a Avhite spot on its inner web, giving the appearance of a crescentic band Avhen vieAved from beneath. It has also been figured by Audouin, in plate 4, fig. 4, of his “Expedition to Egypt.” The draAvings in this Avork Avere done by M. Savigny, after Avhom Stephens, in his edition of “ShaAv’s Zoology,” named the bird. * I append the German text of this passage ; — “Oder endlich gar Localformen ein und derselben art ? Aber ist das nicht ein Name ohne alle tiefere philosophische Oder physiologische Bedeutung ! Vielleicht um so besser, wenn die Philosophic oder Physiologie aiif schwachen Fussen steht. Fine thatsachliche Bezeichnung erinncrt doch wenigstcns an einen Thatbestand.” 174 CHELIDONES. Family Hill UNDINIDHl. ( Bonaparte. ) Genus Hiritndo. ( Linnceus.) EUFOUS SWALLOW. Ilirundo Daurica. Ilirundo Daurica, “ rufula, H (( a a LiNNiEus. Savi; Oru. Tosc. Temminck; Mau., 3rd. Ed., p. 298. (excluding syuonymes. ScHiNZ; Europ. Faun., vol. i., p. 250. (excluding syuonymes.) ScHLEGEL; Kerue, 1844', p. 18 and 51. 66 66 66 66 66 6 6 66 Degland; Oruitli. Eur., No. 155, the male. Ceespon; Faun. Merid., vol. i., p. 309, the male. Bonaparte; Bev. Grit., pp. 40 and 47. List of birds, (portion) No. 59. Conspect., p. 339, (excluding the synonyme of Bilppell.) Jaubeet; llev. Zool., 1854, j), 261, the adult only. De Selys-Longchamps; Bulletin de L’Academic de Bruxelles, vol. 22, part 2, p. 125. & t* if RUFOT'S SWALLOW. 175 Jlirundo aJpestris, “ Capensis, Hirondelle RoiisseUne, rousse, or rufaline, Hothliche Schicalhe, Kondine di Siberia, Malherbe; Faiinc Orn. Sicile, (excluding synonymes.) Bonaparte; Intr. Faun. Ital. Keyserling et Blasius; Die TV irbelthiere, No. 201, (portion.) Durazzo; Ucc. Lig., No. 45. Of the French. Of the Germans. Savi. Specific Characters. — Medium size. Top of the head, back, wings, and tail, black; the outer tail feathers for the most part faintly spotted with white; nape rufous, not striated; rump pale rufous, passing into whitish posteriorly; below the cheeks, and under wing coverts, russet, with very narrow brown striae, which are however absent in the anal region; the posterior half of the under tail coverts black; feet moderate size. Length about seven inches; closed wings four inches and four fifths; external tail feathers four inches; tarsi half an inch; posterior toe (without claw) six tenths of an inch; posterior claw about a quarter of an inch. This bird lias been confounded witli several others. It was first noticed by Savi, in 18-31, in the “Orni- tologia Toscana,” Appendix to vol. i., p. 201, as Hirundo Daurica, Lin. — the Rondine di Siberia. It was after- wards introduced as a European bird in tlie second edition of Temminck’s Manual, as identical with Hirundo Capensis of Gmelin, from which however it is clearly distinct. Temminck proposed for it the name of Rnftda, which it retained through the many scientific difficulties it encountered after his time. Temminck’s reasons for the change of name is hardly defensible. He thought 170 IlUFOUS SWALLOM'. that it was not right to use the word Capensis for a European species, and he therefore translated the word Rousseline, given to the Cape bird by Le Vaillant, into Ritfula. The next difficulty it had to encounter was from the Prince of Canino, who, after adopting the name of Temminck in his “List,” in 1838, applied the name Alpestris in his ^‘Catalogo degli uccelli Europe!,” in 1842. In his “Eevue Critique de 1’ ouvrage de Docteur Degland sur les Oiseaux d’ Europe,” in 1850, he further adds to the confusion by describing it as a miniature Hirundo Senegalensis , although it is at once distinguished from that bird by the black apex of the under tail coverts. He also united it with another distinct bird, the H. vielano- ertssa, of Ruppell. Schlegel, in his “Revue Critique des Oiseaux d’ Europe,” of 1844, was the first to notice the confusion of the true H. rvfula of Sicily with its congeners, namely, H. Capensis, H. alpest7'is, ( Daui'ica,) H. Senegaletisis , and H. sU'iolata. KeyseiTing and Blasius, in “Die Wirbelthiere Europas,” 1840, describe as a European species the H. alpestris of Pallas, and identify it with H. 7'ufida. Schinz, following Temminck, confounds H. rufula with H. Capensis; while Degland, in his Ornithologie Euro- peene,” in 1849, describes the male bird with the omission of the important character of the termination in black of the inferior tail coverts; but for the female he again falls back, and gives a description of H. Capensis, in which mistake he is followed by IM. Crespon, in the “Faune Meridionale.” Gould figures H. Senegalensis for H. rufula. Lesson, in his “Traite Ornithologie,” 1831, confounds Rufida with both Senegalensis and Capensis. Ruppell figures H. melanocrissa for the first time, in 1845, in his RUFOUS SWAIJ.OW. ITT ‘^Systematische Ubersicht der Yogels Nord-Ost Africa;” and Bonaparte at once claims this bird as H. rufula. After which we cannot wonder that Blyth, Sykes, Hodgson, and Gray should more or less have confounded its synonymes. M. De Selys-Longchamps has removed all this confusion by an admirable memoir upon the Swallows, in the work which I have referred to in the specific characters. I am indebted to this memoir for most of what I have to say about H. rufula. The Bufous Swallow has been observed in Greece, on the Italian shores of the Mediterranean, and in the South of France. It is not observed in the two latter countries commonly, but accidentally on its passage in April or May, in couples or flocks more or less large. It has been frequently observed in Sicily. At Messina, according to Luigi Benoit and Cantraine, it was common in 1832. The Marquis Durazzo has recorded its appearance at Genoa; M. Crespon, at Nimes; M. Jaubert, at Marseilles. According to Lunel it nested in the neighbourhood of Avignon, in 1845 and 1846. Fie describes the eggs as white, with small reddish spots and points, which formed a zone at the greater end, which indicates that he did not get the egg of H. Daurica. M. Jaubert has also observed it at Mont- pellier, and M. Malherbe in the Cote-d’or and the Drome. Mr. Tristram remarks, (Ibis, vol. i., p. 26,) “FF. rufula appears to be the Common Swallow of the Holy Land. I cannot be sure that I saw H. rustica at all, though possibly it might not yet (April) have returned from the south.” De Selys (Op. cit.) remarks about its real country as follows : — “The question was formerly asked from 2 B VOL. III. 178 RUFOUS SWAIJ.OW. whence came our Domestic Swallows? It is now known they pass the winter in Africa; hut this (picstion may be still asked with good reason as to H. rufula. From whence does it depart, and Avhat is its true country? No ornithologist has yet (1855) been able to answer this question. We only know the bird from its accidental appearance on the shores of the Mediterranean. Those who took it for H. Daurica, {H. alpestris, Pall.,) thought it came from Siberia, and this presumption might be justified by the simultaneous appearance in the same parts of the Mediterranean of many Siberian birds, such as Emberiza rustica, E. aureola, E. pityornus, E. pusilla, Accentor Calliope, etc.; but if Rufula is very nearly allied to Daurica, there is still a difference between them; nor has it yet been found in Pussia, or upon the coasts of the Black Sea. Prince Bonaparte seemed to have settled the question, by claiming its identity with H. melano- crissa of Abyssinia, but unfortunately we have seen that they are distinct.” “H. rufula being as we may say intermediate between H. Daurica and H. melanocrissa, I am led to believe, in the absence of further proof, that its home must be one of the mountainous countries situated between Egypt and India, probably the mountains in the south of Armenia or Persia. I exclude for the present the hyjsothesis of Barbary, as it has not yet been met with in Algeria or Spain.” ^‘As far as we know of H. rufula, and until we can in a more positive manner determine the differences which age may introduce between this species and its congeners, it is distinguished from H. Daurica by the exceedingly fine brown streaks on the inferior parts of the body, by the larger russet collar, and by the KUFOL'S SWALLOW. 1T9 nissot of the nuiip, which passes decidedly into a whitish tint posteriorly. “It is distinguished from Melanocrissa by the presence at all ages of the streaks on the under parts; by the absfiice of the anal russet border; by the less deep russet of the collar; by the brighter red on the rump passing into white posteriorly; and by the whitish spot which almost always is found on the external tail feather.” Since the above was written by M. De Selys, avc have further accounts of this bird, which not only verify his prognostication as to the true country, but appear to remove all doubts as to the identity of II. rufula and H. Daurica. I allude to the observations of Mr. Tristram, before noticed, that it entirely takes the place of H. rustica in the Holy Land and in Egypt. Also to the still more important and interesting account given of H. rufula, by Mr. Simpson, (Ibis, vol. ii., p. 288,) where he describes it as inhabiting Missolonghi and Southern Hitolia, and further gives some most interesting accounts of its nidification in AV estern Greece, in the same volume, p. 386. ]\Ir. Simpson describes the egg as white, which is further proof of the identity of this bird with H. Daurica. M. Ed. De Selys-Longchamps has very kindly sent me his Grecian specimen, which I have had very carefully figured; and through the kindness of Mr. Tristram, I am also able to figure one of the eggs taken by Mr. Simpson, in Greece. ]M. De Selys accompanied the specimen with some valuable remarks, from which I extract the folloAving: — “As to Hirundo rufula, my statements are quite verified as to its country being the mountains of Eastern Asia, since Mr. Tristram (Ibis, vol. i., p. 27,) indicates 180 KUFOUS SWAIJ-OW. it as the Common Su’allow in the Holy Land. It must, however, be added to this that it inhabits Greece regularly, and not accidentally. (Ibis, Oct., 18(30, p. 386, Mr. Simpson.) This observer gives valuable information in saying the eggs are quite Avhite, like those of H. urhica. It is then more than probable that M. Lunel made a mistake when he said they were spotted. This discovery as to the eggs and that of its true country, confirms me in my belief that this species is identical with Daurica, as I had before supposed. I have in reality received from Siberia specimens of Daurica which have the nuchal collar complete, and as to the brown streaks below the body being more or less marked, they are no doubt so according to age, of which I have proof in its congener Melanocrissa. The name of Daurica ought to stand with the addition of a very doubtful race, which may be called Rufula — H. rufula? “Edward ISJewton’s Sw'allow, (Ibis, 1859, p. 462,) seen between Cairo and Alexandria, in Egypt, was probably H. melanocrissa. M. Jaubert, of Marseilles, has, I believe, figured and described in his_ work, ‘Eichesses Ornithologique, etc.,’ the II. rufula of Mar- seilles. The work being at my country residence, I cannot quote it with eertainty at this moment. My mounted specimen is without indication of sex.” In accordance with the opinion expressed by M. De Selys, I have sunk the name of Rufula, and adopted that of Daurica, leaving it for future observers to determine whether there is or not a race to which the name Rufula may yet be given. In Mr. Simpson’s very interesting account of some of the Birds of Western Greece, (Ibis, vol. ii., p. 386,) I extract the following about the nesting of H. RUFOUS SAVALLOW. 181 Daurica : — “II. riifula ( Daurica ) is still more singular in its niclification, always fixing its nest under a cave or projecting slab of rock. In the little Klissoura, and tlirougliout the precipices of ikracyntlius, there are plenty of these caves, in former times a convenient refuge for the Klephtsas; they are uoav for shepherds tending their flocks during the Avinter months. This eccentric SAvalloAV, not satisfied Avith having a good dry caA’e all to himself, must needs construct a long passage to his nest; thus giving it the shape of a retort, Avith the upper part cut aAvay, and the remaining portion glued underneath a flat surface. The entrance is narroAV, but the passage gradually Avidens till it finally opens iirto a sort of chamber, very Avarmly lined Avith feathers; here the little fellow and his mate are sure to be most snugly tucked in just after sundoAvn, when they cannot see to catch any more insects. Escape therefore is impossible Avhen a ruthless orni- thologist wishes to capture the pair for the sake of identifying their eggs. No more than one pair ev^er seem to occupy a cave, though the remains of previous nests could occasionally be traced on the roof. The same pair appear to return year after year, and their nest, unless injured by shepherd boys during the Avinter, will merely require a little touching up to render it again habitable. The fact of the same birds returning Avas proA'ed by these caves being untenanted, where the pair had been captured during the preceding year. Several nests Avith eggs Avere found toAvards the end of May and beginning of June, 1859. Four seems about the complement; they are quite Avhite, much resembling eggs of H. urhica, Avhich could be Avell passed off* for them in collections. “A curious circumstance in connection Avith one of 182 RUFOUS SWALLOW. these nests occurred to Dr. Kriiper and myself, in a cave at the entrance to the little Klissoura. Fastened to the roof of this cave, (Avhich was on the face of a low cliff, and not easy of access,) we espied a very good nest of H. rufula, {Daurica,') upon which Dr. Kriiper proceeded to operate with a penknife, whilst I placed my hand over the month of the passage. Presently something that felt cold, like a dog’s nose, began rubbing against the palm. On withdrawing the hand a thick snake poked his head out of the aj^erture, looked around for aAvhile, and then popped in again. He Avas in very good quarters, and evidently intended to take a lease of the premises, which just suited him, as he could coil himself up in the bulb of the retort, Avith his head and neck stretched out along the passage, in readiness for any emergency. We soon had him sprawling on the floor of the caAx, Avhen it became apparent that he had SAvallowed a full-groAvn young SAvalloAv; the other three being in all probability destined for a similar fate. The sensations of those Avr etched little victims, lying in such close contact Avith their horrible enemy, must have been someAvhat akin to those of Ulysses and his companion in the caA’e of Polyphemus. In the destruction of the nest tAvo of them made their escape; the fourth was captured and preserved by Kriiper, together Avith the first, which, on being cut out of the body of the snake, Avas found to be A^ery little injured as a specimen. The walls of the cave Avere smooth and nearly perpendicular; the roof at least seven feet above the floor, and no cracks visible; how then could this monster have Avriggled himself into such a well-stocked larder?” Mr. Simpson further informs us that every European species of Hirundo and Cypselas (except, perhaps, H. rt:f()US swallo^v. 183 riparia,) may be found breeding in iSIount Aracynthus. Hirxindo rupestris is tbe only Swallow which winters in Greece. H. Dmirica has the top of the head and back metallic black; Avings and tail dull black; cheeks and auditory region yelloAvish grey; nape and lateral parts of the occiput russet; rump taAvny red, passing into yelloAvish white on the posterior half; throat, chest, abdomen, under tail and Aving coverts, Avhitish, Avashed Avith russet, especially on the chest and flanks, and finely striated with broAvn, more distinct on the crop and throat; the terminal moiety of the under tail coverts, Avell-defined metallic black; beak and feet blackish, the latter slender. The external tail feathers have almost ahvays on their inner barb a small, Avhitish, oval spot, not Avell defined, and placed slightly in adAmnce of the base of the feather, Avhich is covered by the inferior coverts. M. De Selys informs us that M. Jaubert has a specimen Avhich has a well-marked Avhite spot on one of the great tail feathers, while the other is quite black. As I have before mentioned, I am indebted to M. Ed. De Selys-Longchamps for the Grecian specimen Avhich I have figured. I return him my very best thanks for this obligation. The egg is from Mr. Tristram, and is marked “JE. M. 31 — 59. W. H. S.” 184 CHELIDONES. Family HIM UNDINIDH^. f Bonaparte. ) Genus Hirundo. ( Linnceus.J CEAG SWALLOW. Hirundo rupestris. Hirundo rupestris, “ montana et rupestris, Cotyle rupestris, Ptyonoprogne rupestris, Hirondelle de rocher, Felsenschwalbe, Mondine montana, ScoPOLi; 1768. Gmelin; 1788. Boie. Bonapaete. Bonapaete. Of the Feench. Of the Geemans. Savi. Specific Characters. — Upper parts ash. grey, more or less dark according to age; primaries dark smoky brown; tail dark brown, the two upper and two most external tail feathers unicolorous; all the others having a large round white spot on the inner web. Length of tip of beak to end of long wings w'hen closed six inches and a half; from carpus to tip five inches; tarsus five lines; beak seven lines; tail tw'O inches and a half. The Crag Swallow inhabits Sicily, Sardinia, the Alps and Pyrenees, the north of Africa, and the eastern parts of Asia. It is also found in the Appenines, and in Tuscany, in Greece, and the Ionian Islands. We have also records of its appearance in Egypt and the rocks bordering the Chiffa, in Algeria. In India, Dr. r CRAG SWAIJ.OW. inr) Leith Adams informs me that it is generally distributed over the Nilghiris Mountains, in Madras, and on certain parts of the Western Himalayas. In the Epirus we are informed by Lord Lilford, (Ibis, vol. ii,, p. 234,) it is common and resident, “haunting the high and precipitous mountains of the interior in summer, and coming down to the coast during the winter months.” In the same Journal, (vol. i., p. 46,) Mr. Taylor informs us that it is the most abundant of the SavrIIows above Cairo. “I found a nest of this species on the 25th. of January, in the grottoes of Ben-Hassan, containing tAA^o eggs nearly ready to hatch. Both nest and eggs much resembled those of the Common SwalloAv.” In his “Vogel Griechenlands,” p. 118, Lindermayer says, “LT. rupestris is a resident bird in Greece, and found plentifully in the low neighbourhoods in Avinter, flying in large flocks over the sAvamps and the Ioav leA'el grounds near the sea. In summer it is only seen in the high mountains. I have in the early days of March, 1845, killed many specimens in the mountains of Athens. Kriiper found a nest Avith eggs in Akarnania and on Parnassus.” Count Miihle, in his “Beitrage Zur Ornithologie Griechenlands,” page 81, says, — “In summer H. alpestris is only seen on high mountains, such as Taygetus, (Eta, Velugi, etc. In cold clear Avinter days it first approaches human dAvellings, and extends solitarily among them, and is seen in Avaving flights over the tOAvns, which resemble much more the Bee-eater than the Swallow. Here they pass the Avinter, for I haA'e shot them plentifully in the end of December.” From Degland I take the following: — “H. alpestris is sufficiently common in SAvitzerland, in SaA^oy, and in the Pyrenees. I have received it from Bagnerre-di- 2 c VOL. III. 180 CHAO S^VAI-L<)^V. 1 Eigorre and Grenoble. M. Gerbe informs me tbat it is abundant in the department of the Basses-Alpcs, near Moustiers, and in the Var among some of the high mountain rocks which border the River Argent. M. C’respon reports it from the department of Gard; and it is seen in its passage in some other spots in Provence, Languedoc, Anjou, and the department of Isere. It builds among the clefts in the anfractuosities of the rocks, making a nest of tempered clay, small straws, and feathers. It lays live or six white eggs, spotted with red, dark rust, or brown.” “This species flies more slowly than its congeners, and always in regions most elevated. It almost always seeks its food in an undulatory flight above the rocks it inhabits. It arrives in Italy and in the south of France before the other Swallows, and leaves last. M. Gerbe tliinks that some individuals hybernate in certain parts of Piedmont, near the borders of France; because when the winter is not severe, it is not rare to see them in the months of January and February flying above the mouth of the Var, and at Nice above the river which passes through that city. As this species moults before it emigrates, Avhich is peculiar to it, M. Gerbe also suggests that those individuals wFich appear in a season where generally they are not seen again, are the young ones of the last brood, and that a retarded moult has obliged them to remain in our climate.” The male and female have the upper plumage ash grey, with the wings and tail darker. Throat light fawn, gradually becoming darker on the chest and abdomen; under wing coverts dark smoky brown; linger tail coverts hair brown ; the tail feathers, with the exception of the two median, and the two external, have an oval Avhite spot on their inner web; beak C'KAG SWALLOW. 187 blackish; iris hazel, or, according to M. E.oux and M, Crespon, gold-colour. According to Degland, the young before the first moult have the feathers of the upper parts bordered with russet; those of the inferior parts of a yellow russet, and the throat spotted with brown on a white ground. My figure is after a specimen kindly sent me hy Mr. T fistram, marked ‘‘Kedron, near the Dead Sea, March, 1858.” The bird has also been figured by Naumann, pi. 146; Yieillot, Faun. Fr., pi. 39; Foux, Ornith. Provence, pi. 142; Bouteil, Ornith. du Dauph, pi. 38, f. 6; Gould, B. of E., pi. 56. CIIELIDONES. Family CAPRIMULG ID^. (Bonaparte.) Genus Caprimulgus. ( Lmnceus.J Generic Characters. — Beak very short, flexible, depressed, slightly curved, and cleft to beyond the eyes; superior mandible hooked at the point, furnished with stiff bristly hairs directed forwards. !N^ostrils basal, large, closed by a membrane, and partly covered by the feathers of the forehead. Feet with three toes in front and one behind; the anterior toes united as far as the first articulation by a membrane; the hind toe reversible; claws short, except that of the middle toe, which is long and serrated, so as to form a comb. Tail rounded or forked, composed of ten quills. Wings long; first primary shorter than the second, which is the longest. RUSSET-NECKED NIGHTJAR. Caprimulgus rujicollis. Caprimulgus rujicollis, “ rujitorques, Scoiornis trimaculatus, Bugoulevent a collier roux, Halsbandziegenmelker, Temminck. VlEILLOT. SwAiNSON; Birds of Africa, vol. ii. Of the Fbench. Or THE Geemans. Specific Characters. — A collar of russet extending from the cheeks round the back of the neck, and joining on each side in front to a white spot on the throat; first primary shorter than the - N l: c RUSSET-NECKED NIGHTJAR. 189 third. Plumage having a general rufous tint. Length twelve inches; carpus to tip eight inches; tarsus one inch; middle toe one inch; claw pectinated. Beak from gape fourteen lines; breadth at base one inch; tail six inches and a half. The Red, or, as I prefer calling it, the Russet-necked Nightjar, is a native of Africa, being occasionally found in various parts of Europe. The south of Spain and France, namely, Provence, Marseilles, Nimes, and Montpellier, are recorded as its European localities. To these, through the kindness of Dr. Leith Adams, I am able to add Malta, where a specimen was obtained by Charles Augustus Wright, Esq., from whose notes I copy the following: — ‘Tn the spring of this year (1861) a native bird- stuffer sent me word of a curious Goat-sucker having been shot a few days previous, (in the middle of May,) at Emtalitep, a valley situate on the southern coast of this island. When I saw it the bird had already been set up, but the skin was quite fresh, and there is no doubt about its being a fine specimen of Caprimulgus ruficollis. * * addition to the localities given by Degland, I know it is included in an unpublished list of Egyptian birds in my possession, compiled from various sources by Mr. W. C. Medlycott. As far as my information extends, it has never been known to visit Sicily, or any part of Italy, except Nice, where it has been occasionally met with. There appears to be no previous record of its capture in Malta. I am glad to say that the subject of this notice passed into my possession, and now occupies a conspicuous place among my Birds of Malta. C. ruficollis may be easily distinguished from C. Europceus,, by its larger size, general rufous colouring, different proportionate length of primaries, two large white 190 KUSSET-NECKED NIGHTJAR. spots on tlie throat, and the reddish collar from which it derives its name. C. Europceus is a very common bird in Malta during the vernal and antumnal migrations. Before the capture of this species, C. rujicollis was unknoAvn as a Maltese visitor.” C. rujicollis is apparently a rare and local bird in Europe, except Spain. It is not mentioned by Mr. Salvin, in his interesting “Five Month’s Bird-nesting in the Eastern Atlas,” or in Lord Lilford’s “Notes upon the Birds of the Ionian Islands,” published in the ^‘Ibis.” Neither is it mentioned by Count Miihle, or Dr. Lindermayer, as a visitor to Greece. In Mr. Tristram’s “Notes from Eastern Algeria,” however, I find the following, (Ibis, vol. ii., p. 374:) — “As evening drew near the Bed-necked Goat-sucker, {Caprhnulgtis rujicollis,) flitted about the glades, and the note of the Scops-Eared Owl floated on the air, Avith its plaintive ‘Maroof, maroof,’ from which it derives its local appellation.” It is also mentioned by Captain Loche as inhabiting the three provinces of Algeria. Dr. D. Antonio Machado, in his “Catalogo De las Aves observadas en Algunas provincias de Andalucia, Sevilla, 1851,” says of this bird, — “It inhabits the woody flat ground of the mountains; it appears in spring, and leaves again in October: very common. It has no nest, birt places its eggs in hollows in the ground, or under the shelter of some shrub. It frequents the roads where there is much horse or mule traffic, and the vulgar notion is that it feeds upon the dung Avhich it finds there; brrt it is much more probable that it is in search of the beetles Avhich live among it, and which are its principal food. I have ventured to place among the synonyrnes of this bird that of Scotontis trimaculatus, as it agrees in HU.SSET-^ KI KEJ) NIG IITJ A K. 11)1 every important particular with the description given by Swainson of that bird, in his “History of the Birds of Africa,” — “Jardine’s Naturalists’ Library,” Ami. A’iii., p. 70: — Singularly enough Mr. Swainson seems to have OAmrlooked the fact that the European Nightjar has three spots on the inner web of the three first primaries, and has claimed for his bird this exclusi\’e character. IMr. SAvainson giAms eleven inches as the length of his bird, Avhich is rather shorter than that of C. rnjicollis, but the other and more important dimensions are the same. There is another point of difference Avhich I cannot help thinking is accidental. Mr. S. says, “The first primary quill is half an inch shorter than the second and third, Avhich are of equal length, and the longest, AAdiile the fourth is an ineh shorter, and the fifth is one and one fourth inches shorter than the fourth.” If the end of the aboAm passage is transposed, and read, “AVhile the fourth is an inch and a quarter shorter, and the fifth one inch shorter than the fourth,” the Avhole Avill apply Avith joerfect exactitude, like every other part of the desciiption, to C. ruficollis. I have no account to offer of the nourishment, habits, and nesting of this bird. But they are not likely I think to differ much from its European and closely-allied congener. There is the same Avide mouth, Avith its array of bristles, and the same comb to clean them Avith on the claAV of its middle toe. What a beautiful adaptNe proA'ision is this comb. Looked at through a lens, the teeth of the comb are seen to be placed with perfect regularity, and are admirably adapted to their evident use — to clean the bristles, an act Avhich Dr. Maclean tells me he has actually seen performed by our Goat-sucker. The biistles are required 192 RUSSET-NKCKEl) N IG IITJ AR. as a fence for the large mouth, out of which otherwise many an insect would slip away. But the bristles get clogged up, and the God who made this bird has provided it Avith as perfect a comb to clean them with, as is to be found on the table of any lady in Europe! I should like to knoAv how such a provision could have been given by “natural selection,” or “variation,” or by any other “aid to theory,” Avhich Mr. DarAvin or Dr. Asa Gray Avould assign as the means by Avhich this beautiful adaptation was produced? To imagine that this comb on the claw of the long middle toe is an accidental variation, is to surrender common sense. Still more absurd Avould be the inference that such a variation could have been produced by successive steps through a long series of years. The bristles and the comb haA"e a distinct relation to each other. They are parts of the organic structure of the being. Did they vary separately or simultaneously? Were they produced independently or in distinct relation to each other ? How much more good would the RevicAvers of DarAvin do by going into questions like these, rather than giving us long and very often unintelligible and dull disser- tations, in Avhich fine Avriting is more aimed at than sound science. The physiological part of the question, evidently the most important, they seldom or ever touch. The prevailing tint of the upper plumage is grey, more or less tinged with rufous, which is the prevailing colour of the wings and all the inferior parts. The head has the sides grey, Avith a broad band of rufous, and dark brown longitudinal spots between. The nape is composed of the rufous collar which gives the bird its name. Back and upper tail coverts and feathers grey, barred and striated irregularly Avith rufous and KUSSET-XECKED NIGHTJAR. 193 dark brown. Tlie scapularies and upper wing coverts light rufous, mingled with grey and rich dark brow'n. The lesser wing coverts, primaries, and secondaries, deep chesnut, barred with darker brown. The first three prunaries have a large white oval spot on their inner web, each spot from the first being slightly nearer the tip of the feathers. The other primaries are tipped with grey, and more deeply bordered at the ends with the same colour darker. The first primary is about half an inch shorter than the second and third, which are longest. The fourth is an inch shorter than the first, and the fifth one inch shorter than the fourth. Throat, cheeks, and chest, light rufous, with a large white spot on the former; abdomen still lighter rufous, finely barred with brown; under tail coverts fawn-colour. When closed the tail is grey above, divided into a cup-within-cup pattern, the intervals of which at the sides are faAvn-colour; beloAV the tail is fawn-colour, thickly barred with dark blackish brown, and terminating with white; the three lateral feathers on each side have this character above and below, while the rest are dark mottled brown, tipped and edged with fawn-colour. Beak black ; feet and iris brown. My figure is from a specimen sent me by Mr. Tristram, marked “Bojhar Forest, 29th. May, 1856.” It has also been figured by Vieillot, Faun. Franc., pi. 62, fig. 2; Boux, Ornith. Provence, pi. 14S; Gould, B. of E., pi. 52. Caprimul(jus climaturus, the African Long-tailed Nightjar, is mentioned to me in a letter by INI. Dubois, of Brussels, as having been accidentally captured in Europe. 2 D VOL, JJI, 194 EUSSET-XEf'KED XTGIITJAR. Mr. Swainson has separated the Nightjars into two groups. In that for which he retains the name of Caprimulcjiis, the two lateral toes of the foot arc of the same length; in the other the inner toe is longer than the outer, and these he has classed under the generic name Scotornix, and it is to this group that Caprimuhjns climaturus belongs. It is here I think that classifiers err. There is no family so well marked as a family as the Nightjars. In colour they so much resemble each other, that it is impossible to designate by this character alone one species from another. AYhy then divide the genus? Because some few members of the family have a slight difference in the lateral toes, surely we have no right to complicate by dividing the genus! So long as their structure, habits, and ornamentation are similar, a slight deviation in the length of a toe is, with all deference to Mr. Swainson, insufficient to constitute generic distinction. The claims of C. climaturus as a European species are, I think, too slight to justify me in introducing it into this Avork, further than by the present notice. Foot of Russct-neckcd Nightjar, slightly enlarged. 3^ •V ^ V^i VU 'JT rU'C^f fifU r O’wt oiiti ^tniij^j/. ctiif ifuv 'fill .li/ in i/itfifr 'll!) Mli)l ,r^j -ulf ,V.)v\;A^u•.‘V^^" ♦ L irorft 'i>}j»ii»l -K't TUHii o ft 1 >ifro .'vU u? ^ifjj(n t' -Hm* •»ifl tol^Hjn !)'>.‘*-*cl*t HHil 'kT ♦•^:ii!l huu Mi(l ^ lit ii f)n« ^5."trtM\>VK>V, . I tiMl ;la]ih I •.< ij «? jl ,.»v'v)v\i.HMVi . . ylimBt fi -Isi^'byircrtf II /y oh vliuuA otr w n ui r /iio •ilyfnm'ji (bora OH 7 >ili n/ofo') jtl otfi . >^r. |;. >!hlt ‘W t)J ni :Jf ji.rft /.mlto ibiiiO 7if // .'i-tdfortn moil jito oiioisi *hIi l(f Ht'jdiiipni v/'it '^»»ir<»« ?)«ft MiiiyrJi k- yl' • 'Jib iti tiT^ib is ’jviul *li(n.‘ I f ">i{l ^nifiivifi vd oti.-jiffj 101)0 tit Uhh on ,viul -jvf iK»b«}iriftii;u'io l)i»: ,^'tiilml ,')uit->iniH li-jtb Wi ^*no[ ob ^ lo iltjjif'jl ytlj iibjtoh/W Vi»I) jibolH o rJi#; I’ i)t JnobHtiimi ,no»iiit:jvX 1/ ol ID;’ jiil#r I . • • . ^ .\ . ' troft >io J 'jH’l' - Ji ’siibfifMJijHf ui am /tb>w[ nj oot ,ifhish } ^tfa .ooijfin Ja vH-Wq .ib vd ifi:tif''’t nityttl .Jiofr‘'>^hh oini j. ’ '! ■ I ' f t vy - J.ti ■ t ‘i..*’, - ' ■• 'W. IL. ) * ‘ k --" fi^'l 1 Order IX.— COLUMBvE. Family COL UMBIDJE. (Leach.) Genus Columba. (Linnceus.) Generic Characters. — Beak of medium size, compressed; base of the upper mandible covered with a soft skin, through which the nostrils are pierced, the point more or less curved. Feet with three toes in front, entirely divided, and one behind. EGYPTIAN TURTLE DOVE. Columha JEgyptiaca. Columha .Mgyptiaca, “ ca mb aye lists, “ maeulicollis, Tartar Senegalensis, Tourterelle d' Egypte, JEgyptische Tarteltauhe, Latham. Temminck. Wagler; Syst. Avium. Bonaparte. Of the French. Of the Germans. Specific Characters. — External boi’der of the wings black; the upper and middle four tail feathers unicolorous; the most lateral ashy at their base, black iu the middle, and bluish white at their distal ends; no black and blue collar on the neck. Length nine inches and a half; carpus to tip five inches and a half; tail four inches and a half ; tarsus nine lines ; middle toe and claw one inch ; beak eleven lines. X.B. — The above measurements are from the dry skin of the female specimen which is figured. 19G EGYPTIAN TURTLE DOVE. GiiEEUE is the European locality of the Egyptian Turtle Dove, and Asia and Africa its real home. Its name is derived from its frequent occurrence in Egypt; but it is also recorded as an inhabitant of Turkey by Degland, and of the Sahara in Algeria by Captain Loche. Count Miihle, in his ‘‘Oniithologie Gricchenlands,” says, “I have shot this pretty Dove many times in summer, when drinking with the Common Turtle Dove, but until the last year I had not regarded it as a distinct species.” Dr. Linder may er, Avriting as late as 1860, in his ‘‘Vogel Gricchenlands,” says that he has not hitherto found it; but he has had the eggs sent to him Avhich he had mistaken for those of the Bee-eater, until after due inquiry he Avas set right upon this point by Herr Baron Konig-Warthausen. The eggs came from Attila. He from this inferred that the Egyptian Dove arrives about the same time as the Common Turtle Dove, breeds at the same places, and goes aAvay with it, by reason of Avhich Lindermayer considers it has been so little noticed. Erhardt does not include it in his list, nor has Kriiper discovered the eggs. There cannot hoAvever be any doubt about its oceurrence in Greece, because Miihle’s description of the bird is Axry exact. The male and female liaA^e the head, neck, and throat a beautiful pink, or flesh-colour, Avith the feathers under the base of the beak pure Avhite. There is a distinct collar between the throat and the chest of pinky russet, AAdiich goes only to the nape, Avhere it becomes blended Avith the colour of the back. From the nape to the rump, and to the edges of the Aving coA'erts on each side, the colour is a rich lustrous russet broAvn, (cb HAZEL G R O U c E. 7/'? m jv/n ., iMU Mf* > ' ai »»(ii-(yr aidi ’in yl>>ii!(i » J ifi '«i 1 'ii*' bill In >*<*ilt | Tnrhinil «|»|ll ; It f7U U* " T»>Jni!» i«(. ^Jiofily ntjfu « hnn t|o•^'^ ; n’w«>l« j afl*i/0'» !».: I rbiTII fuiti 'Jfit lU.ih <|lt«lc>:> ; V'>T55 v>hiiK hiU; K^nr.ft lin? *^0 !’>!»«« ;irA/o’n< Jdjiif Jin<{ T)I>nir ■ 'iliif*'/ »'>ti(j 1/ /i'>i{l \ ’’jil -I. , . ■ /PVM 'rin ^tTni^iJ'.tk 'i iitto iDnii'J Tin ''ill Ijii^ J .'>?»«{ Jii j>rj|J 1^ ^ VfJ Iff! 3ir»»f floraiv'q** r» Mo^ olcm-ji: n >i ■?rtT .'» •(/Mrm' vjffo «i»rr-^.>r^niffrtn-/r '^AwwUd ^ htiVl y>— ')7t>(l *)i3”Ti' I ifoft pitJi) ' >.'lt Iq Tt‘->rn»^ ^ itr f>-hTji'>*).' fititf il ,fiMrtf»h».b k .«if #ji .Af- I>nft fu ii n* vkH ‘nii*)^ ! > K{XO V>m tw. lo •• Ilf , , vfofijl v w bnofi^i tihr I \.'Wuirt n ^Qiiivl^i ' ;< gnnf'oiWi: '>ii i (J^jB hi». vU>/ti.j fiKiit Jifti w :Tit rto‘>1lir^l tModAi COLtJMBA GELASTTS. 197 tlie scapularles being entirely of this colour, while in those parts at the sides which verge upon the wing coverts, the feathers are each bordered with a brighter russet. Primaries, riimj), and upper tail feathers hair brown; upper wing coverts slate grey, lower dark brown; crop and chest a more vinous or darker flesh- colour than the head; abdomen and under tail coverts cream-colour; flanks and under wing coverts slate grey; under part of primaries light brown; under part of tail black at the base, then white, while the grey tips of the other feathers are seen beyond. I And marked on tbe label of my specimen tarsi and feet flesh-colour; irides yellow; bill, bluish black, blue at base. jNIy figure is a female from a specimen sent me by Mr. Tristram, marked “Benyan, Dec. 1st., 1856.” The egg is also from a specimen sent me by the same gentleman, marked “V. E,., 1857.” It has also been figured by Temminck, in his celebrated work upon Pigeons, pi. 45. Columha gclastis, Temminck. — This is only considered a variety of the Common Turtle Dove — a larger bird with a redder- coloured abdomen. It has occurred in the south of Sweden; and ]\Ir. Sclater tells us, ^‘Ibis,” July, 1861, that we may expect some day to see it in Englarid. Without, therefore, in the absence of speci- mens, giving a figure, I will record here all we know about the bird. The following is Nilsson’s account, copied, translated, and kindly sent me by Mr. Wheelwright: — “The old bird about thirteen to fourteen inches long; wing from carpal joint eight inches. On the sides of the neck a 198 COLUMBA GELASTIS. black spot witli four white transverse streaks. Wings above blackish, with broad rusty red edges to the feathers, which give these parts a scaly appearance. Tail rounded, black, with a broad whitish grey tip, the web of the outer feathers grey; the middle nearly free from the light tips. Back and upper parts blue; head and breast Avhitish grey, with a rusty tinge, especially in the breast; under tail coverts bluish white. — Stockholm Museum. Young. Tail black, with a broad white tip, which is absent on the middle feathers; wings, etc., dark brown, with rusty yellow tips. Black spots on the sides of the neck scarcely visible. — Stockholm Musemn. This Dove, which was formerly only known in Japan, has of late years been met with in S^veden. In December, 1842, a young example was purchased in Stockholm in a load of other birds from Herjeadalei, where it was caught in the autumn. An older specimen was sent down alive by a ship-builder, named J. Peterson, of Piteo, to the Stockholm Museum. It was caught in a forest tract a mile and a half Swedish from the town. It was kept alive in Stockholm some time, but died December 20th., 1853, and is now preserved in the Museum as one of the rarest and most handsome of Swedish birds. According to Professor Sundevall, the note exactly resembles that of the Turtle Dove, (consequently not laughing, as the name would imply,) and the general appearance of the two birds is so similar, that were it not for the size it might easily be taken for a large variety of O. Turtur. Professor Sundevall imagines that besides Japan it inhabits North-Eastern Asia, and that the yearling bird, which was caught in Herjeadalei, was hatched in the above-named province or in Lapland. COLUMliA GEl.ASTIS. 199 In its native conntiy it aiipcars to inhabit rocky mountainous tracts.” Dr. Leopold Von Sclircnck, in bis “Reiscn und Forscbungen iin Amur Lande,” Vol. 1, Part 2, 1854-6, page 390, bas a long account of tins bird, from wbicb I extract tbe following: — “Tbis is only a geograjabical variety of C. Turtur, distinguisbed by its greater size and by its darker colouring. The Amur Lande species resembles mark for mark tbe C. Turtur ^ and in tbe tone of its colouring most resembles the description given in the “Fauna Japonica,” especially tbe wings, tail feathers, and upper parts; tbe under parts are brighter than in C. Turtur, and tbe lower breast is of a clear vinous reddish, without the yellowish tint; round tbe neck and upper part of tbe breast there is less brownish, and more vinous reddish grey colouring. The under tail coverts and the tips of tbe tail feathers are in all our specimens grey, and certainly in spring of a somewhat darker bluish ash grey; in the latter part of summer, on tbe contrary, they are shaded into a greyish white. “We also find in the young of C. gelastis tbe characteristic markings of C, Turtur, namely, Avbite on tbe tail and under tail coverts p)assing into grey, and on tbe belly into vinous red. Besides this C. gelastis bas all tbe distinctive marks of tbe young Turtle Dove, especially on tbe throat and crop down to the breast, where tbe colour is grey brown, with rusty yellow edges to tbe feathers, without tbe glossy appearance; also on the primaries and secondaries towards tbe end tbe edges are broad rust brown, and tbe upper tail coverts, as well as the two middle tail feathers, have a slight rust brownish tip to each feather, passing into bluish grey borders in the middle of tbe feathers. 200 COLIIMBA GELASTIS. “In the next plumage tlie young birds have the iris two colours^ in a sharply-defined ring; the inner part brown, and the outer yelloAvish. Beak bluish grey; feet violet grey. In the old birds in summer I have found the iris had its outer border in a slender whitish ring, and the inner part red ; beak violet grey, especially towards the base; feet violet red.” Dr. Schrenck then discusses the opinions of other writers upon the specific difference of this bird. Temminck and Schlegel refer to the larger size of Gelastis, and the former to the shorter tail and longer wing. Middendorff also notices the larger size of the body, while Pallas is of ojiinion that the same difference as exists between the two in size, may equally be observed between the Bussio-European and the Dauritian examples of C. cenas and C. lima. The following is Dr. Schrenck’s table of dimensions of the Amur bird: — Male. — Length of closed wings seven inches three lines, tail five inches, beak seven lines and a half, tarsi eleven lines and a half, middle toe (without claw) one inch, claw of middle toe three lines and a half. Female. — Length of closed wings six inches eleven lines, tail four inches ten lines, beak seven lines and a half, tarsi eleven lines and a half, middle toe (without claw) one inch, claw of middle toe three lines. Young. — Length of closed wings seven inches, tail four inches eleven lines, tarsi one inch, middle toe (without claw) one inch one line and a half, claw of middle toe three lines and a half. On the whole, I think we may give C. gelastis to Mr. Darwin as a transitional variety. I will not, however, apologize for making a further extract from Dr. Schrenck’s interesting notice. Dr. Schrenck goes on to remark that the Turtle COIAIMBA GELASTIS. 201 Dove has spread along the shores of the Pacific Ocean to Dauria, and in larger numbers eastward to the Stanowvi Mountains and to the coasts of the Ochotsk Sea, (according to MiddendorlF,) to the neighbouring country of the Amoor, and (according to Temminck) to Japan, where it assumes its largest form, and has the same variety of colours which have been described in C. gelastis. “In the Amoor I found C. gelastis very common, as well at the mouths of the rivers as also further outwards, and on the Ussuri. It is also found, according to the testimony of the natives, on the Island of Sachalin. On the Amoor it remains in the hazel woods, as Avell as among evergreens and willow bushes on the islands, and, as far as I have been able to observe, in the neighbourhood of Avater. I have often seen them a short distance from the river, on the level sand and pebbles, between light willoAV branches, sitting in pairs, or in small companies of four to six. At first I thought they repaired to such places only to drink or pick up small stones and coarse grains of sand, but the specimens which I shot sheAV me that they find their food there as Avell. I found the crop filled Avith Phnjgane, AA^ich is found abundantly, and of various kinds on the Amoor. I am not aAvare that this has oAxr been observed as the food of our Turtle Doves in Europe. “Quite early in the spring this Turtle Dove appears on the Amoor. At the Nikolajev Posten I found them in the spring of 1855, the end of April; and it also appeared at the mouth of the rUer about the 8th. (20th.) of May, Avhen the bushes Avere covered Avith ice, and there Avas still much snoAV in the forest. “The moulting begins among the old birds in the 2 £ A"OL. III. 202 COLI'MBA GELASTIS. latter half of August, much later among the young ones, probably not until the old ones have completed their change, “This Dove plays an important part in the religious ceremonies of the inhabitants of the Amoor, as docs also the Cuckoo.” Further details of this interesting part of his subject Dr. Schrenck reserves for another part of the great work which is now throwing so much light ujjon the history of this interesting country. r. Sfiitir ■ ■II., ^4 [ J^il '■* •»<<' '^ai./H T ..l^nW 1» • i<||U''/') 'ftitti '~*L¥» i>Kli I'll '('‘(Ki; I ■>■ 'MJ> 'll Ju'tf JlK.tli/ljfCI Itt, * ^ ^ ^<.,.,,it/ ulf ‘I»> na. ’i*'a;>i/''i' r*' .!!'' i i K'f. ia ■'>-■ .‘■'■■^ H I' I;M , -Mpj iifgiii Oil ./n;iil! ■•! . t iJ/'il'f/ ' M • .y^IlKKW Wfij" 1. Mill >i|!» “in 71