anes hod ee ey to 2. Gn, 22 ater seviy tDegheee eine Sit < cate et hse Sra omstMe SS oa see paenee apie fA econ: ? ai tee" cena pee ee eee Fae OF ~ eee ore Seu peer ire ate wrayer aeee 5 ‘SDP >, >-7 ; >" SoS <> “s =e ee 2 : » 4 Sw = > SY hae Ss ee De 2S os = > eZ = > > SS > S SS SS > BSB >: 5 SD De Se : x DY > S > > a Dp : 5 3p > SDD pe > >> Se “ ee 2 ee . ” _F _ 2! DDS < ge 26 IDY Dy 22>? 9 VE» =e 2 . ‘ = ZI gece ie i) > SD > aS SS = = SS, eee ae 99> EEE S>> oa DID S SS ——— IP Zz _ > > > > > 2 = ES SS ie as SS ee — 2: a > =P >> 5 = , : — : ————— ¢ >> » SOI I> 5 > D> Sooo 2D DH 22> >>> > y : ls | SSS Oo SS SS >>> SD : - Se IPD» 92 >> S> > os.
DSSS
eer >? Wy: Z
>>> DS
22>
eZ
p) > a
ED
33>
> .? o> eS
we paz Ss
DY DIL PD»
ee) Zee
Sy SSB > DD
EY ISP PD
Se a
Sa SS SSS
Se SD
‘ee I es
ie > > =
ae 2D) > DBP lp
p> > BE?" o> Ieee
Ss
3S
aD
SSS
> 8) Sy
2B2E.
—— =
>)
A HISTORY
OF
THE BIRDS OF EUROPE,
INCLUDING ALL THE SPECIES INHABITING THE
WESTERN PALMARCTIC REGION.
BY
H. KE. DRESSER, F.LS., F.Z.S., erc.
VOLUME VII.
HORN DFOyNS
PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR,
6 TENTERDEN STREET, HANOVER SQUARE, W.
1871-1881.
ALERE FLAMMAM.
PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS,
RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
OTIDZ.
CHARADRIIDA.
cS
NG am cee i DR SIR SOE OAL IYTES SE Se a ay SO PART ELIT Tee fal Way
yy i
GRALLEZA.
Rtas
Rca
—&
IW
GLAREOLIDA.
SCOLOPACIDA (to Gallinago)
_ SOLUME il
GALLINA.
COLUMBA.
GDICNEMIDA.
PD)
——— fr Ee LZ
Sema ia eee re OA Nm net PE
Gas nasa) ee” NS
Soom \
158.
159.
160.
164.
LETTERPRESS TO VOL. VIL
Genera and Species.
CoLUMBA . Sete 3
454. Columba palumbus
455. Columba livia .
456. Columba cenas .
457. Columba bollii.
458. Columba laurivora
459. Columba trocaz
TURTUR. ane
460. Turtur vulgaris
461. Turtur orientalis .
462. Turtur isabellinus .
463. Turtur risorius .
464. Turtur senegalensis
PTEROCLES. Bae)
465. Pterocles arenarius
466. Pterocles alchata .
. SYRRHAPTES
467. Syrrhaptes paradoxus
. PHASIANUS.
468. Phasianus colchicus .
. CACCABIS
469. Caccabis saxatilis .
470. Caccabis chukar
471. Caccabis rufa
472. Caccabis petrosa
AMMOPERDIX . hae ate
473. Ammoperdix bonhami
Date of
publication.
1880
1878
1879
1876
1875
1875
1875
1880
1876
1876
1877
1877
1876
1880
1874
1874
1880
1876
1880
1879
1880
1875
1875
1875
1875
1880
1880
Issued in
Part
Pages in
article.
1
8
ro
1
ob Ww oo
PPD ROH
Pe PAO RHE OH OF aAaoH
Final
paging.
93-96
97-102
103-109
111-114
115
117-120
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
Hil
176.
lv
Genera and Species.
FRANCOLINUS . miticcyaus
474. Francolinus vulgaris .
PERDIX. Sith
475. Perdix cinerea .
CoTURNIX . é
476. Coturnix communis .
LaGopus eet
477. Lagopus mutus.
478. Lagopus scoticus .
479. Lagopus rupestris .
480. Lagopus hemileucurus
48]. Lagopus albus .
BONAsA. aa noke
482. Bonasa betulina
TETRAO. 0 6
483. Tetrao tetrix :
484. Tetrao mlokosiewiczi .
485. Tetrao urogallus
TETRAOGALLUS ee
486. Tetraogallus caucasicus .
487. Tetraogallus caspius .
. TuRNIX.
488. Turnix sylvatica
. RALLUS.
489. Rallus aquaticus
. PORZANA
490. Porzana maruetta .
491. Porzana bailloni
492. Porzana parva .
. CREX
493. Crex pratensis .
PORPHYRIO oie
494. Porphyrio veterum
495. Porphyrio smaragnotus .
496. Porphyrio alleni
Date of
publication.
1880
1876
1880
1878
1880
1878
1880
1874
1873
1874
1871
1874
1880
1871
1880
1873
1876
1875
1880
1878
1878
1880
1876
1880
1878
1880
1878
1878
1878
1880
1878
1880
1876
1876
1880
Issued in
Part
80
51, 52
80
67, 68
80
69, 70
80
Pages in
article.
1
10
—
Sr of
— =
9 ee I
Se oY OP eH
oR Re OH © @EH
Final
paging.
121
125-128
129
131-140
141
145-154
155
157-164
165-174
175-178
179-182
183-190
191
193-202
203
205-217
219-221
223-233
265
267-274
275-282
283-288
289
291-296
297
299-302
303-306
307-309
177.
178.
Leg).
180.
185.
186.
187.
Genera and Species.
GALLINULA
497.
FULICA .
498.
499.
Grus
500.
501.
502.
Otis
503.
504.
505.
506.
507.
508.
509.
510.
511.
512.
Gallinula chlor: opus .
Fulica cristata .
Fulica atra .
Grus communis
Grus virgo .
Grus leucogeranus
Otis tarda
Otis tetrax .
Otis undulata .
Otis macqueeni
. CEDICNEMUS
(idicnemus malopaee
. GLAREOLA .
Glareola pr niealn
Glareola melanoptera
. CURSORIUS.
Cursorius eallicus.
. CHARADRIUS .
Charadrius pluvialis :
Charadrius fulvus .
SQUATAROLA
513.
Squatarola Helvetica P
Squatarola helvetica.
ZAGIALITIS .
514.
516.
516.
517.
518.
fEgialitis aeofroyi
ffigialitis asiatica .
Aigialitis cantiana
Aigialitis curonica
Aigialitis hiaticula
EUDROMIAS
519.
Eudromias earl
Appendix A .
Date of
publication.
1880
1879
1880
1879
1879
1880
1873
1879
1878
1880
18738
1872
1876
1876
1880
1876
1880
1874
1874
1880
1875
1880
1871
1871
1880
1871
1876
1880
1878
1878
1876
1876
1876
1880
1875
Issued in
Part
80
73, 74
80
73, 74
73, 74
80
18
73, 74
69, 70
Pages in
article.
a
eo
STE wor ANH wR
Final
paging.
311
313-319
367
369-381
385-389
391-394
395-397
399
401-407
409
411-418
419-421
423
425-431
433
435-441
443-452
453
455-463
465-472
473
475-478
479-481
483-489
491-496
497-503
505
507-518
188.
189.
190.
191.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
Vi
Genera and Species.
PLUVIANUS :
520. Pluvianus egyptius
CHETTUSIA .
521. Chettusia gregaria
522. Chettusia leucura .
PEO Ene
23. Hoplopterus spinosus
VANELLUS . ier
524. Vanellus aeati :
. STREPSILAS
525. Strepsilas intebpres
3. HaMatorus
526. Heematopus Miraleeue
RECURVIROSTRA rans
527. Recurvirostra avocetta
HIMANTOPUS . ;
528. Himantopus candid
PHALAROPUS .
529. Phalaropus eernerede:
530. Phalaropus fulicarius
SCOLOPAX .
531. Scolopax aeicala
GALLINAGO 9
632. Gallinago major
533. Gallinago ccelestis
534. Gallinago gallinula .
Date of
publication.
1880
1878
1880
1875
1871
1880
1878
1880
1875
1880
1875
1880
1877
1880
1875
1880
1877
1880
1874
1874
1880
1877
1880
1876
1880
1877
Issued in
Part
80
65, 66
80
37
2
35, 36
63, 64
Pages in
article.
I
HM WOH OH TAH oe SH wor BH ORE oo
(<1
(3%)
e
omor
Final
paging.
519
521-523
525
527-530
531-536
537
539-542
577-583
585
587-594
595
597-604
605-611
618
615-627
629
631-639
641-651
653-660
PLATES TO
Plates.
. Columba palumbus .
. Columba livia .
. Columba cenas
. Columba bollii
. Columba laurivora
. Columba trocaz
. Turtur vulgaris
. Turtur orientalis .
. Fig. 1, Turtur isabellinus ;
Turtur risorius .
. Turtur senegalensis .
. Pterocles arenarius .
. Pterocles alchata .
. Syrrhaptes paradoxus
. Phasianus colchicus .
. Fig. 1, Caccabis saxatilis ;
C. chukar .
. Fig. 1, Caccabis rufa; fig.
petrosa
. Ammoperdix Bente :
. Francolinus vulgaris.
. Perdix cinerea ¢ ad. et juv.
. Perdix cinerea 2 et pulli
. Coturnix communis .
. Fig. 1, Lagopus mutus ;
rupestris .
. Lagopus mutus
. Lagopus scoticus .
. Lagopus rupestris (Rock Bene
gan on Plate)
. Lagopus rupestris 2 et 2 al
Issued
in Part
. 65, 66
. 67, 68
751,52
. 41, 42
. Al, 42
. 41, 42
50
. 05, 06
ha 2
. 65, 66
. Ol, 52
33
33
53
. 75, 76
fig. 2,
Zs
. 43, 44
. 85, 36
. 17-79
. ol, 52
. 63, 64
. 63, 64
i 63564
fig. 2, L.
VOL. VII.
No.
482.
483.
484,
485.
486.
487.
488.
489.
490.
491.
492.
493.
494,
495,
496.
AQT.
498.
499.
500.
501.
502.
503.
504.
505.
506.
507.
508.
Plates.
Lagopus hemileucurus .
Lagopus albus est.
Fig. 1, Lagopus albus hiem. ; fg.2 2,
L. mutus hiem..
Lagopus albus (feet only) .
Bonasa betulina .
Tetrao tetrix
Tetrao mlokosiewiczi
Fig. 1, Tetrao urogallus (tone
dus); fig. 2, 'T. urogallus ¢ steril.
Tetrao urogallus .
Tetraogallus caucasicus ? et il
Tetraogallus caucasicus ¢ ad. et
ju. a enere
Tetraogallus caspius .
Turnix sylvatica .
Rallus aquaticus .
Porzana maruetta
Porzana bailloni .
Porzana parva.
Crex pratensis.
Porphyrio veterum
Porphyrio smaragnotus .
Porphyrio alleni .
Gallinula chloropus .
Fig. 1, Fulica cristata; fig.
F. atra
Grus communis
Grus virgo .
Grus leucogeranus
Otis tarda .
Issued
in Part
No.
509.
510.
511.
512.
513.
014.
515.
516.
517.
518.
519.
or Or Or OV On
bp bp Ww b bl bo
He OF DS ee >)
On
On
Plates.
Otis tetrax .
Otis undulata .
Otis macqueeni
Cidicnemus scolopax
Fig. 1, Glareola pratincola ; fp 2,
G. melanoptera
Cursorius gallicus
Fig. 1, Charadrius plains este 5
fig. 2, Squatarola helvetica est.
Charadrius fulvus :
Fig. 1, Squatarola helvetica niet ;
figs. 2,
hiem.
3, Charadrius fulyus
Figs. 1, 2; Charaanis! playa
fig. 3, Squatarola hel-
vetica autumn. . :
Fig. 1, Squatarola elven fig’ 9,
Charadrius pluvialis :
autumn. ;
pull .
. Fig. 1, Aigialitis asiatica hiem.;
fig. 2, AX. geoffroyi hiem.
. Aigialitis geoffroyi
. AXgialitis asiatica .
. Aigialitis cantiana
. Adgialitis curonica
. Agialitis hiaticula
Issued
in Part
13
54
Vili
Z
(op) 9°
orc On
S&S) ks) I
Or Or
eo oF bo WH WY WH
(ee)
CX OK
ps
. Strepsilas interpres .
. Hematopus ostralegus .
. Scolopax rusticola
. Gallinago major .
. Fig. 1, Gallinago ccelestis ;
Plates.
. Eudromias morinellus
. Pluvianus egyptius .
. Chettusia gregaria
. Chettusia leucura
. Hoplopterus spinosus ;
. Vanellus vulgaris (Wendling @ cris-
tatus on Plate) .
. Recurvirostra avocetta . 2
. Himantopus candidus 2 et pull. .
. Himantopus candidus ¢
. Phalaropus hyperboreus
. Phalaropus fulicarius
5 Jain,
1, fulicarius
hiem. ;
hiem. .
Phalaropus
fig. 2, P. hyperboreus
. Gallinago ceelestis, pale var. ( Gal-
linago gallinaria on Plate) .
fig. 2,
G. ceelestis, var. sabinii .
. Gallinago gallinula .
Subclass SCHIZOGNATH &.
Order I. COLUMB.
Family COLUMBIDA.
Genus COLUMBA.
Columba, Linneeus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 282 (1766).
Palumbus apud Kaup, Natiirl. Syst. p. 107 (1829).
Palumbena apud Bonaparte, Cat. Parzud. p. 9 (1856).
Trocaza apud Bonaparte, Compt. Rend. xliii. p. 837 (1856).
THE Pigeons must decidedly be ranged near the Gallinaceous birds, though some authors have
- placed them in quite distinct divisions and apart. Sundevall (who divides our birds into two
large groups—the one, which he terms Gymnopedes, containing all those which are, when
hatched, naked and helpless, and the other, called by him Dasypedes, embracing those which
are covered with down on emerging from the egg and are more or less able to take care of
themselves) places the Pigeons amongst the Gymnopedes, separating them from the Galline
by the Accipitres. In Professor Huxley’s classification, which I have followed as nearly as
possible, the Pigeons, together with their close allies the Sand-Grouse, form the first order of
the Schizognathe, being followed by the Gallinez—a position which is clearly the most natural
one for them.
The Pigeons inhabit the Palearctic, Ethiopian, Oriental, Australian, Nearctic, and Neotropical
Regions, six species being found in the Western Palearctic Region. They inhabit both open and
wooded localities, and the mountains as well as the plains, according as they find an abundance
of food. They have a strong, swift, and protracted flight; walk with ease, taking short steps,
sometimes running quite fast. Their note is a deep coo; and both sexes utter this note. They
nestle on trees or bushes, amongst the rocks, and even on the ground, and deposit two pure-
white elliptical eggs. The young birds, when first hatched, are nearly naked, being covered but
sparingly with thin, soft down, are quite unable to do any thing for themselves, and are fed with
vegetable substances softened in the crop of the old birds, and which the parent birds introduce
into the mouths of their young with their bills.
The food of the Pigeons consists entirely of vegetable substances of various kinds; and they
drink very regularly, usually early in the morning and late in the evening.
Columba livia, the type of the genus, has the bill rather short, straight, slender, the upper
mandible having at the base two soft tumid bare substances over the nostrils ; culmen depressed
towards the tip, which is obtuse, but thin-edged; nostrils linear, placed in the lower anterior
portion of the nasal membrane; wings long, full, the second quill longest; tail moderate,
slightly rounded ; legs short, strong; tarsus anteriorly scutellate, posteriorly scurfy; toes mode-
rate, scutellate ; claws short, compressed, arched, rather acute; cesophagus dilated and expanded
into a large two-lobed crop, below which it narrows.
158
, ay nr
3 F tart
hirer FAY 4
dis fis
456
Hanhart imp.
JGKenlemans lith.
RING-DOVE.
COLUMBA PALUMBUS.
COLUMBA PALUMBUS.
(RING-DOVE.)
Columba palumbus, Briss. Orn. i. p. 89 (1760).
Columba palumbus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 282 (1766).
Columba palumbes, Pall. Zoogr. Rosso-As. i. p. 563 (1811).
Columba torquata, Leach, Syst. Cat. M. & B. Brit. Mus. p. 26 (1816).
Palumbus, Kaup (Columba palumbus, L.), Natiirl. Syst. p. 107 (1829).
Columba pinetorum, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 488 (1831).
Palumbus torquatus (Leach), Bp. Cat. Parzud. p. 9 (1856).
Columba trocaz, Morel. Hist. Nat. Agor. p. 84 (1860, nec Heine).
Palumbus excelsus, Bp. Compt. Rend. xliii. p. 836 (1856).
Colombe ranuer, French; Pombo trocaz, Portuguese; Paloma torcaz, Spanish ; Colombaccio,
Italian; Tudun, Maltese; Kamoor, Moorish; Ringeltaube, Holztaube, German; Ringduif,
Dutch; Ringeldue, Danish; Digva, Feroese; Ringdue, Norwegian; Ringdufva, Swedish ;
Kauluskyyhky, Finnish ; Lesnoi-Golub, Russian.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 316; Werner, Atlas, Pigeons, pl. 1; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. taf. 28;
Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 29. fig. 3; Naumann, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 149; Sundevall, Svensk.
Fogl. pl. 31. fig. 2; Gould, B. of Kur. pl. 243; id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 1; Schlegel, Vog.
Nederl. pl. 183; Bettoni, Ucc. Lomb. pl. 18.
Ad. capite et collo superiore saturaté cxruleo-cinereis, capitis lateribus purpureo et violaceo nitentibus, collo
macula utrinque alba notato; corpore supra fusco-ceruleo: remigibus primariis nigricantibus, extus
albo marginatis: tectricibus alarum ceruleo-cinereis, sed tectricibus primariorum majoribus et mino-
ribus albis, alula spuria nigra, secundariis dorso concoloribus: caudé versus basin ceruleo-cinerea,
versus apicem nigrd: collo antico et pectore vinaceis, abdomine pallidiore: supracaudalibus, subcau-
dalibus, subalaribus et uropygio cinereo-ceruleis: rostro ad basin rubro, versus apicem flavo: iride
flava: pedibus incarnatis.
Juv. adulto similis sed coloribus sordidioribus, macula nulla in lateribus colli.
Adult Male (Kent, March). Head and upper neck dark dove-blue, sides of the neck richly glossed with
violet and purple, each side marked with a large white patch, which nearly meet behind the neck;
back dark slaty-brownish ash; wing-coverts dull dark bluish, but a long patch on the outer part of
the wing is pure white; primary quills black, externally edged with white; secondaries coloured like
the back, but rather darker; wing-coyerts, along the edge of the wing, and spurious wing slaty black ;
lower back, rump, and upper tail-coverts rich dove-blue; base of the tail rather darker, and the
terminal half of the tail black; lower throat, breast, and upper abdomen rich vinous, gradually
2
becoming paler on the abdomen, and on the lower abdomen merging into pale dove-blue; lower
flanks, under wing-coverts, and under tail-coverts dove-blue; bill bright red at the base, and becoming
yellow towards the tip; iris straw-yellow; legs coral-red. Total length about 165-17 inches, culmen
1:05, wing 9:4, tail 6°5, tarsus 1:2.
Adult Female. Closely resembles the male, but is a trifle smaller in size, and the patch on the sides of the
neck is smaller, the vinous coloration of the breast being a trifle paler.
Young. Differs from the adult in being duller and paler in coloration, in lacking the white patches on the
sides of the neck, and in having the bill dull red at the base, and greyish towards the tip.
THE present species is generally distributed throughout Europe, except in the more boreal
districts, but does not range far into Asia, being there replaced by a closely allied species,
Columba casiotis. Southward it is found as far as North Africa, but does not range further
south in that continent, and is not recorded from the east side of North Africa.
With us in Great Britain it is common and generally distributed, having increased largely
in numbers, it would seem, during the last few years. It is found with us at all seasons of the
year, and in some parts of the country is so numerous in the winter and spring as to do great
damage to the agriculturist. Mr. Cecil Smith writes to me, “In Somersetshire it is a resident
and mischievously numerous, being greatly on the increase. ‘The capacity of the Wood-Pigeon
for food seems unlimited, as I have taken from the crop of a single individual as many as
seventy-seven beech-masts and one large acorn: this immense quantity of food was in the crop
only; the gizzard, in this case, I did not examine. Luckily for the Guernsey farmers the Wood-
Pigeon is by no means a very common bird in the island, though its numbers are occasionally
increased by migratory flocks, especially in the autumn.” ‘The same increase in numbers is
observable in many other parts of England, and especially on the east coast. Mr. Cordeaux
writes of it (B. of Humb. Distr. p. 76):—< Is much more numerous than formerly, having greatly
increased during the last ten years. Collects in immense flocks in the autumn, and in sharp
weather resorts to the cabbage- and turnip-fields to feed on the leaves of these plants. In severe
winters with much frost and snow, the ranks of our local birds probably receive considerable
accessions, either from the north or the continent, as I have observed they are invariably, at least
in this neighbourhood, much more numerous in a severe than in an open winter.
“ Wood-Pigeons are remarkably partial to salt water, and will daily during the summer
quarter resort to those drains in the marsh to which the tide has access, to drink the salt water.”
In Scotland the present species breeds throughout the country, its numbers being largely
augmented during the winter by migratory flocks, which probably, as is generally supposed by
the farmers on the east coast, come from Scandinavia. When in Haddingtonshire quite lately
I saw large numbers of Ring-Doves, and was told that these migratory flocks are sometimes so
numerous as to cause most serious injury to the farmers. Mr. Robert Gray, writing on this
subject, says (B. of W. of Scotl. p. 216), “That a large yearly accession to the winter flocks takes
place through migration is, I think, evident from the fact that the eastern counties only are
affected by the increase, and that, looking to the destruction of so many hundreds in one year,
no such increase can reasonably be traced to the results of a single breeding-season. Many years
3
ago, indeed, I am informed by Mr. Alexander Henderson, an observant bird-student resident in
East Lothian, he had repeatedly seen considerable flocks of Wood-Pigeons alighting on the
coast near his house, evidently in a state of exhaustion. These birds, he remarked, were smaller
and darker in plumage than those hatched in the neighbouring woods; and he was convinced at
the time of their appearance that they were migrants from other countries. Very soon after this
information was communicated to me, I witnessed a still more extraordinary instance of foreign
invasion, on the sea-shore about three miles east of Dunbar. I had gone out about daybreak,
and was astonished to see a prodigious cloud of Pigeons fully a mile seawards, steering for the
nearest land. The entire body of birds alighted on the sandy beach at Catcrag Bay, which they
completely covered between the rocks near the limestone quarry and the opposite point in the
direction of the town. I am satisfied there must have been in the flock twenty or thirty thousand
Pigeons at the lowest computation; and, from the fact of their alighting immediately on reaching
land without any preliminary survey of the ground, I concluded they had come in from a long
journey. ‘Their tameness on my approach confirmed this conjecture, as I was allowed to put
them up within twelve or fifteen yards. ‘The cloud slowly ascended; and a line was formed, six
or eight birds deep, which gradually drew off the main body, forming a singular spectacle when
viewed against the morning sky, and almost realizing the descriptions of Wilson and Audubon
when writing of the Passenger Pigeon of North America and its ‘ five-mile’ processions in the
air.” In the same work (p. 217) Mr. Gray writes as follows:—“Throughout the western
counties of Scotland the Wood-Pigeon, though very numerous and apparently on the increase,
is by no means so abundant as in the eastern districts. It is plentiful in Islay, where it was
introduced by the late Mr. Campbell, proprietor of the island. It is found in Mull, Sky,
Inverness, Ross, and Sutherlandshire; but westward of the inner islands it ranks only as a
strageler. A few are occasionally seen in spring and autumn in Benbecula and South Uist, but
they do not remain.
“During the autumn and winter months the Ring-Dove, as this beautiful bird is also called,
feeds chiefly upon the seeds of wild mustard, chickweed, roots of ranunculus or crowfoot, ivy-
berries, oak-‘ spangle,’ berries of the hawthorn and holly, and various other fruits and seeds. I
remember many years ago shooting great numbers in a garden at Dunbar, where their plundering
visits to the gooseberry-bushes were a source of constant annoyance. Each Pigeon must have
consumed a large quantity daily, as I found the crops of those I killed quite distended with
gooseberries. Beech-nuts are also a favourite food, judging from the immense quantities
devoured. From newspaper paragraphs now before me, I learn that in the crop of one bird
shot in East Lothian 272 beech-nuts were found; and that in another, shot by Mr. Joseph
Sadler, at Alyth, in Forfarshire, there were found 1020 grains of corn! Mr. James S. Dixon,
of Glasgow, who has for some years taken notes on the food of this species, informs me that he
has many times been interested in watching a flock of Wood-Pigeons traversing a grass-field, and
eagerly picking off the seeds of the common buttercup, which they appeared to swallow with
avidity.” In the north of Scotland the Ring-Dove becomes scarcer, but it is by no means
uncommon in Sutherland. Mr. J. A. Harvie-Brown says that it is “ plentiful like other sylvan
species at Rosehall, between that and Bonar Bridge, and in the east generally. In 1834
Mr. Selby observed it as far north as Tongue, where it breeds in the plantations and_birch-
4
woods about the base of Ben Laoghal; but he adds, ‘a few pairs only were seen during our
excursion. Now it is more plentiful at Tongue; but in the west only occasional pairs are seen
at rare intervals, spying out, no doubt, the nakedness of the land. In the spring of 1869 one
pair frequented a small patch of birch-wood close to Loch Assyut; and I observed them feeding
in the fields around for a few days; but they soon took their departure, probably to return to
the better-wooded slopes of the Kyle, at Rosehall.” In Shetland, Dr. Saxby says, “though
formerly seen at long and irregular intervals, it now appears every spring and autumn, though
in small numbers, more than two seldom being observed at one time in the same locality.
Those which visit the islands are mostly adult birds; they are apparently fatigued and desirous
of resting immediately after their arrival—but are nevertheless, in general, shy and watchful as
elsewhere, only approaching the gardens at dusk for the purpose of roosting, and keeping to the
most open fields during the day. ‘The only Wood-Pigeon I have seen arrived about the end
of October 1864, and remained for many days. ‘The bird was remarkably tame, and seemed
greatly to wish to fraternize with the House-Pigeons, which, however, as soon as it appeared
among them, always flew off in great alarm, dodging it as if it were a Hawk—a very singular
fact ; for they never take the slightest notice of the presence of the Rock-Dove amongst them.”
In Ireland, as in England, it is very generally distributed; but it has not been met with in
Iceland, and is of rare occurrence in the Feroes. Captain Feilden states that Herr Kreuser, of
Eide, informed him that he saw several about Eide in the winter of 1871. Mr. H. C. Miller
received one from Kalbak on the lst June 1865; and in the middle of November 1868 many
were seen, and several shot, at various places in the islands.
In Scandinavia the Ring-Dove is widely distributed up to about 65° N. lat. Mr. Robert
Collett informs me that “it breeds in Norway commonly up to the frontiers of Nordland, but is
less numerous about the coast than in the wooded portions of the interior. It is generally found
in dense conifer-woods intermixed with a few deciduous trees, usually far from human habita-
tions, being scarcely ever seen near houses or farm-buildings, as is so often the case in Continental
Europe. It arrivesin the commencement or towards the middle of April, and leaves about the
middle of October. It breeds in May, frequently making use of a deserted crow’s nest or that of
a squirrel, but rarely building a new one for itself, in which case it constructs it of the finer
twigs of the birch.” In Sweden, Professor Sundevall writes, it is common, and breeds through-
out the country, arriving early in April, occasionally late in March, and leaving in September or
October. It appears to range northwards up to about 64° or 65° N. lat. Meves met with it at
Ahre, in Jemtland, and on the Angermanelf on the 20th July. Von Wright says (Finl. Fogl.
p-. 305) that it is common enough in Central and Southern Finland, but he is unaware how far
north it ranges. He met with it in Idensalmi; and, according to Dr. Malmgren, it occurs and
breeds in Kajana. In Russia it is found as far north as the White Sea; for Meves writes that
he found it tolerably common in Onega Bay and near Archangel. Mr. Sabanieff informs me
that it is common in Central Russia, and is most numerous in the Smolensk Government. He
found it in all wooded districts throughout the Perm Government, but especially numerous in
the south. According to Mr. Taczanowski, it is common in summer in Poland, where it arrives
early in April and remains until the end of October. Throughout North Germany it is generally
distributed, and breeds in wooded localities not only far from houses but also close to habitations ;
5
for Mr. Schalow states (J. f. O. 1876, p. 113) that it breeds regularly in the Thiergarten of
Berlin, close to the Charlottenburger Chaussee, undisturbed by the constant traffic which passes
there. According to Mr. Collin, it is the commonest of all the Pigeons which breed in Denmark,
and is generally distributed in suitable localities. It usually arrives in March; and during mild
seasons large numbers remain over winter. In Heligoland, Mr. Cordeaux writes (Ibis, 1875,
p- 184), it “is common during both periods of migration, in flights more numerous in the autumn
than in the spring, from five to ten or twenty ina flock. Time of migration from the end of
March to the end of May, and from the latter part of September to the end of October.” In
Holland it is very common, being chiefly found during summer, arriving in April and leaving in
September or October; but it not unfrequently remains there over winter. In Belgium it is
common and resident; and in France it is found everywhere, in large flocks, on the double
passage, but is nowhere so common, as a resident, as in the public gardens of Paris, where it is
found eight months in the year in a state of semidomestication. M. Adrien Lacroix says that
it occurs on passage in the French Pyrenees, nesting accidentally only in the Hautes Pyrénées
and Pyrénées orientales; and in Portugal, according to Professor Barboza du Bocage, it is
common. In Spain it is common in the winter; and some few breed there. Colonel Irby says
that a few pairs breed in the cork-wood near Gibraltar and in other wooded districts in Southern
Spain, but it is most abundant during the winter months. Von Homeyer observed it in the
Balearic Isles, and says (J. f. O. 1862, p. 417) that a few pairs occur in the wooded districts of
Majorca, In Savoy it is abundant on passage, more particularly in the autumn, and occurs also
in summer, but very few remain over the winter; and in Italy it is chiefly to be met with on
passage, though some few nest there, as also in Sicily and Sardinia. Mr. C. Bygrave Wharton
found it not uncommon in Corsica during the winter, but noticed none in the spring; and
Mr. C. A. Wright says (Ibis, 1864, p. 157) concerning it in Malta:—*‘ Passes in April and May,
and again in September, October, and November. Never seen in great numbers. Does not breed
here, doubtless owing to the want of woodlands.” In Southern Germany the Ring-Dove is a
tolerably common and generally-distributed summer resident. Mr. Seidensacher informed me
that it breeds throughout Styria in suitable localities; and Dr. Fritsch says that it is commoner
in Bohemia than the Stock-Dove, arriving late in March, collecting in flocks in the autumn, and
leaving the country in October. In the Carpathians, Count Casimir Wodzicki says, it is common
as far up as the forest extends, and breeds twice in the season, some few pairs even rearing three
broods in the year. Messrs. Danford and Harvie-Brown state (Ibis, 1875, p. 416) that it is
common in Transylvania at some seasons, but they did not observe it when there in the summer ;
and in Turkey, according to Messrs. Elwes and Buckley (Ibis, 1870, p. 200), it is tolerably
numerous in most parts of the country, but is never seen in large flocks. The bird found there
is, they add, rather larger and darker than our British bird.
Dr. Kriiper says that it winters in large numbers in Greece and Asia Minor, but only a
few pairs remain to breed in the most lonely forests in the mountains, and nests have been taken
on Mount Parnassus and the Veluchi. Very large flocks are seen at the foot of the Olympus in
winter. Lord Lilford, who met with it in the Ionian Islands, writes (Ibis, 1860, p. 236) as
follows :—“I noticed very large flocks of Wood-Pigeons near Phanari, in the plains through
which the Acheron runs. This was in March 1857. I have occasionally seen a few in different
2P
6
parts of Epirus during the winter months; but it is not abundant in that province. I never saw
it in Corfu.”
In Southern Russia it appears to be very common, especially on the east side of the Black
Sea; and Professor von Nordmann states that in October there is one continuous stream of
migration between Anapa and Trebizond, lasting for ten or fifteen days, and immense numbers
are netted by the inhabitants. It is said to be common in Asia Minor in winter; but com-
paratively few breed there. Mr. Danford informs me that he found it common, in large flocks,
at Gozna during December, and saw it at Anascha in March and April. Dr. Kriper says that
he is unaware if any breed there. Referring to the occurrence of the present species in Palestine,
Dr. Tristram writes (Ibis, 1868, p. 209) as follows:—‘‘ Of the Columbide, Columba palumbus is
spread in countless myriads over the wooded parts of the country in winter. Never, even in the
lowlands of Scotland, have I seen such flights as cover the forests of Gilead at that season. ‘The
flights of Passenger Pigeons in America alone can compare with them. The fellahin villagers of
Gilead adopt a cruel yet simple device by which large numbers of Ring-Doves are taken in the
season of migration. A bird is snared, its eyelids sewn up with thread, and then it is tied to a
perch, and placed on a tree, where the spectacle of the captive vainly flapping its wings attracts
a continuous crowd of its fellows, many of whom fall victims to the weapons of the fowlers, who
are in ambush close by. It would be inexplicable how such multitudes of Pigeons can find a
living in a comparatively uncultivated country, did we not know that all the Columbide feed
greedily on the foliage of any species of leguminous plants, and that the clovers and Astragali
are the characteristic flora of this country, coming into leaf in winter and withering in April and
May, by which time all the Ring-Doves have left. Indeed I doubt whether any remain so late
as May, though possibly a few linger in Carmel and the higher grounds near the coast.”
There appears to be no undoubted instance of its occurrence in North-east Africa, though
Von Heuglin says that he thinks he recollects seeing it at Alexandria; but it is not uncommon
in North-west Africa. Loche says that it is resident in Algeria, in moderate numbers, in the
forest of Boghar and other wooded districts, and is abundant on migration. Mr. Tyrwhitt Drake
observed it in Morocco in March; and, according to Favier (fide Colonel Irby, Orn. Str. Gibr.
p. 132), it is found near Tangier throughout the year; some are migratory, crossing to Europe
in March and April. Colonel Irby himself says (0. ¢.):—“‘In some localities in Morocco the
Wood-Pigeon positively swarms. In April, up a valley near the Foudak, to the south-west of
that place, on the road between Tangier and Tetuan, it would have been easy to shoot a hundred
in a day, they were in such numbers and so excessively tame. Two or three which we shot to
eat, had their crops full of the tuberous root of some weed which had been ploughed up and was
lying in quantities about the fallow fields. During the same month, about three years previously,
I noticed considerable numbers about Larache; but there they were much more wild, though
not so shy as in England or Andalucia.” It has also been met with in the Azores; but
Mr. Godman, who says (Nat. Hist. Az. p. 31) that he received two examples from the Azores,
adds that it is only found in the eastern and central groups, and is most common in St. George’s
and Pico.
To the eastward the Ring-Dove does not extend far into Asia, indeed not much to the east
of the Ural, being replaced by Columba casiotis, which is easily distinguishable by its buff neck-
if
patch. Specimens from Bagdad in the British Museum are referable to the present species; but
near Shiraz, in Persia, Mr. Blanford only met with Columba casiotis.
In habits the Ring-Dove does not differ much from the Stock-Dove; but it is easily recog-
nizable from that species by its larger size, longer tail, and more especially by the white markings
on its wings. It is exceedingly shy, and well able to take care of itself; and when disturbed
whilst perched on a branch it almost invariably flies out at the other side, thus placing the tree
between itself and the intruder. It walks on the ground with ease, taking short dainty steps,
and is there quite as cautious and wary as when perched ina tree. During the breeding-season
it seems to be less gregarious than its allies, and breeds in scattered pairs; but at other seasons
of the year it frequently collects in larger and smaller flocks, and seeks its food in the oak-forests,
beech-woods, and on cultivated ground, frequently creating great devastation in the latter.
The note of the Ring-Dove is a deep coo, which is uttered by both sexes, but less frequently
by the female than by the male, and is most often heard in the pairing-season, when the male
bird is paying his addresses to his mate. It seldom coos whilst seated on the ground, and still
more seldom when on the wing, but usually when perched on some tree-top. The male fre-
quently rises from his perch high up into the air and circles down again, with extended wings
and tail, to where his mate is waiting for his caresses. The Ring-Dove lives in strict monogamy ;
and great affection appears to exist between a pair when mated. ‘Two broods are usually raised
in the season, and perhaps in some instances three. The first eggs are deposited about the
middle of April, and the second lot in June. ‘The usual place selected for the purpose of
nidification is on the edge of a wood; but the nest is often found in the middle of a dense forest,
and not unfrequently in gardens surrounded by human habitations. Lither an old nest of a Jay,
a Crow, or a Squirrel is made use of, or else the bird constructs one for itself; in the latter case
it is, as is usual with all the Pigeons, a very poor structure, consisting merely of a platform of
twigs so loose that the eggs may be seen from below. Both birds assist in bringing together the
materials; but the female appears to be the sole architect.
Two eggs are almost invariably deposited, the first soon after the nest is finished, and the
second three days later; and incubation lasts about eighteen days. ‘The eggs are pure white in
colour, thin-shelled, elongated oval, and, compared with the size of the bird, are small, being but
little larger than those of the Stock-Dove. When the young are hatched they are blind and
very helpless; when about nine days old they get the use of their eyes, but are carefully fed by
their parents, and remain in the nest until well able to fly.
The food of the present species consists of seeds of various kinds, buds, &c. It is very fond
of the seeds of various conifers, of beech-nuts, grain of various kinds, rape-seed, linseed, turnip-
seed, acorns, &c.; and tender fresh leaves of plants are often found in quantities in its crop. It
also feeds on blueberries, gooseberries, and other fruits. Like the other Pigeons it goes regularly
to drink, usually in the morning and in the evening; and there are drinking-places to which it
regularly resorts.
In confinement the Ring-Dove does not seem to thrive well, though when taken from the
nest and brought up it becomes tolerably tame. When captured old it is difficult to keep alive,
and has to be crammed for some time, until by degrees it can be got to feed itself.
The specimen figured is an adult male from Kent, and is the bird above described.
2P2
10
8
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
ad, 3,6, 2. Kent, April. c¢,juv. Leadenhall Market. d, d. Pisa, Italy, March 1864 (H. Giglioli).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a,b, 3,c, 2. Granada, April and May. d, d. Valencia, Spain, November 12th.
E Mus. E. Hargitt.
a, 3,6, 2. Inverness, June 2nd, 1869 (H. Hargitt).
Hanhart ump
ROCK DOVE.
COLUMBA LIVIA.
COLUMBA LIVIA.
(ROCK-DOVE.)
Columba livia, Briss. Orn. i. p. 82 (1760).
Columba saxatilis, Briss. tom. cit. p. 84 (1760).
Columba enas, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 279 (1766, partim). °
*Columba livia, Gm. Syst. Nat. i. p. 769 (1788, ex Briss.).
Columba saxatilis, Gmel. ut supra (1788, ex Briss.).
Columba livia, Bonnat. Tab]. Encycl. et Méthod. i. p. 227 (1790).
Columba amalie, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutsch]. p. 491 (1831).
Columba intermedia, Strick]. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1844, p. 39.
Columba rupestris, C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 256 (1855, nec Bp.).
Columba elegans, C. L. Brehm, ut supra (1855).
Columba glauconotos, C. L. Brehm, ut supra (1855).
Columba unicolor, C. L. Brehm, ut supra (1855),
Columba dubia, C. L. Brehm, ut supra (1855).
Columba gymnocyclus, G. R. Gray, List of B. in Brit. Mus. part iv. p. 28 (1856).
Columba plumipes, G. R. Gray, tom. cit. p. 29 (1856).
Columba turricola, Bp. Consp. Gen. Av. ii. p. 47 (1857).
Columba schimperi, Bp. ut supra (1857).
¢Columba fusca, Severtzoff, Turk. Jevotn. p. 68 (1873).
Columba neglecta, Hume, Lah. to Yark. p. 272 (1873).
Caluman-fiadhaich, Gaelic; Colombe biset, French; Pomba, Portuguese; Zurita, Paloma
brava, Spanish; Piccione selvatico, Italian; Hamiental gebel, Maltese; Hamam el Berri,
Moorish ; Feldtaube, Felsentaube, German ; Blaadiqva, Feroese ; Klippe-due, Norwegian ;
Klipp-dufva, Swedish.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 510; Werner, Atlas, Pigeons, pl. 4; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. 2nd Suppl.
taf. 4; Naumann, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 150; Sundevall, Svensk. Fogl. pl. 31. fig. 1; Gould,
B. of Eur. pl. 245; id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 3; Bettoni, Ucc. Lomb. pl. 80.
Ad. capite et collo saturaté schistaceo-ceruleo, héc imo viridi nitente et in parte antica lateraliterque «neo
purpureo lavato: dorso et tectricibus alarum minoribus ceruleo-canis, dorso imo cum uropygio albis :
supracaudalibus et cauda cxruleo-schistaceis, fasciis alarum duabus et caudze apice nigris: remigibus
sordidé schistaceis, versus apicem fusco tinctis, corpore subtts saturaté czruleo-canis: subalaribus et
axillaribus albis: rostro rufescenti-fusco,. membrana narium tumida albo-cinerea: iride aurantiaca :
pedibus rubris.
Juv. ubique sordidior, fasciis alarum minus distinctis, et collo vix viridi nitente.
Ii
12
2
Adult Male (Feroes). Head and neck dark slate-blue, the neck glossed all round with green, below which,
on the fore part and sides of the neck, it is richly shot with coppery purple; back and lesser wing-
coverts pale dove-blue; lower back and rump white; upper tail-coverts and basal portion of the tail
slate-blue, the terminal portion of the tail black; quills dull pale slate-blue tinged with brown towards
the tips; rest of the wings pale dove-blue crossed by two black bands; underparts dark dove-blue with
a slaty tinge; under wing-coverts and axillaries white, the edge of the wing dove-blue; bill reddish
brown; iris orange; legs reddish. Total length about 11 inches, culmen 0°8, wing 8°5, tail 4-6,
tarsus 1:2.
Adult Female (Feroes). Resembles the male, but is rather smaller, and duller in general coloration.
Young. Very much duller in general coloration, and haying the black bands on the wing less clearly defined
than in the adult, and there is but little of the green gloss on the neck.
THE present species, which, it is now almost universally admitted, is the stock from which all our
tame varieties of the Pigeon have sprung, is tolerably widely distributed, being found, though
locally, from Northern Scandinavia into Northern Africa, and to the eastward its range extends
into China and Japan.
In Great Britain the Rock-Dove is tolerably common in suitable localities where there are
high cliffs and heavy rocks, in the crannies and caves of which it can find shelter. Mr. A. G.
More, speaking of its breeding-range in Great Britain, says (Ibis, 1865, p. 141) :—‘* Commencing
from the south of England, the Rock-Dove used to breed formerly at Purbeck (Rev. H. Austin);
but there is no direct evidence of its having ever bred in the Isle of Wight.
“Mr. E. H. Rodd includes the Rock-Dove in his list as breeding occasionally in Cornwall.
The Rev. M. A. Mathews has observed it building in the cliffs about Lynton. Mr. W. D. Crotch
reports it as breeding in Somersetshire. ‘The bird is said to be common in Gloucester and
Monmouth.
“ Sir W. Jardine gives Caldey Island as a locality; and Mr. Tracy marks the bird as breeding
in Pembrokeshire. The Rev. H. Harpur Crewe has observed it breeding in Denbighshire; and
there are probably several other localities in South and North Wales.
“Mr. J. F. Brockholes tells me that there is a colony at Beeston Castle, Cheshire, and that
he once noticed a pair frequenting the high banks of the Mersey during the breeding-season.
Mr. C. 8. Gregson informs me that the Rock-Dove breeds at Whitbarrow Scar; and Mr. J. B.
Hodgkinson has found its nest occasionally in Cumberland: it breeds also in the Isle of Man, as
I learn from my obliging correspondent Mr. J. F. Crellin.
‘‘On the east coast of England the Rock-Dove breeds only at Flamborough; it also breeds
in a few rocky valleys or inland cliffs in Derby, York, Leicester, Stafford, Shropshire, and
Somerset.”
To this I may add that I have certainly seen the Rock-Dove in the Isle of Wight late in
March; and, referring to its supposed occurrence in Somerset, Mr. Cecil Smith writes to me
that he is “‘doubtful as to its being really an inhabitant of this county; I included it in my
‘Birds of Somerset’ on the authority of the Rev. M. A. Mathew, who told me that a colony had
taken up their abode near Weston-super-Mare; and since then, in February 1871, I saw some
Rock-Doyes at a place called Uphill, not very far from Weston-super-Mare. I pointed these out
5)
c9)
to a boatman who was with me, thinking that they were probably tame Pigeons; but he told me
there were no Pigeons kept at Uphill, and that they lived in the rocks. Shortly after this I had
a letter from a correspondent at Cheddar suggesting that some Pigeons he saw about the Cheddar
cliffs were wild Rock-Doves; but I think it extremely probable that these, at all events, were
escapes. I have never met with the Rock-Dove in Guernsey or the Channel Islands. Professor
Ansted, however, mentions it in his list as being found in Guernsey and Sark; but I am very
doubtful about this.”
As above stated, the Rock-Dove breeds in some numbers in the cliffs at Flamborough Head ;
and Mr. Hancock writes (B. of North. & Durh. p. 85):—‘ This is a resident, and is undoubtedly
the true Stock-Dove from which the domestic Pigeon is derived. by
18, to 12% by 12% inch, eggs from Algeria being both the palest and smallest.
Mr. Salvin says that the eggs are laid in May, the young being hatched about the second
week in June. According to Loche, the young when they emerge from the shell are covered
with down, but are helpless, or at least unable to run, being fed by the mother, who disgorges
the food for them after the manner of a Pigeon; but after a few days they are able to run and
to search for their own food. Should, however, there be no water in the immediate vicinity, the
mother brings it to them until they are able to fly.
The specimens figured are the adult male and female described, and are in my collection,
the young bird described being in the collection of Mr. Howard Saunders.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
Ei Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,3d, 6,2. Seville, Spain, May. c,d, d,¢,e, 9. Seville (Lord Lilford).
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a, b. Spain, November 1867. c,¢. Laghouat, Sahara, November 5th, 1856 (H. B. T.). d, Q. Sahara,
November 14th, 1856 (H. B. T.).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a,d ad. Near Seville, April 22nd, 1869 (H. S.). 6,9. Near Seville, May 18th, 1870. c,¢,d,9. Near
Seville, November 10th, 1869. e, d ad. Near Seville, June 4th, 1868 (H. S.). f, 2 juv. Near Seville,
October 20th, 1869.
vit
y
ae sls ‘
Wee dh Fal
aes # ‘ ae wae
Ab ie oN oH 249 fh, , Rica
bit psa ofa 4 ih al oon
, yy ised ae hey
ge ee ery
eave tic be) fe
Genus SYRRHAPTES.
Tetrao apud Pallas, Reise Russ. Reichs, ii. App. p. 712 (1773).
Syrrhaptes, Wiger, Prodr. p. 243 (1811).
Nematura apud Fischer, Mem. Soc. Nat. Mose. iii. p. 271 (1812).
Heteroclitus apud Vieillot, Nouv. Dict. xiv. p. 453 (1817).
Pterocles apud Swainson, Classif. of B. ii. p. 343 (1837).
In many respects the species belonging to the present genus closely resemble the true Sand-
Grouse, but they differ widely in the form of ‘the foot, and in having the legs and toes closely
feathered to the claws.
These birds inhabit the steppes of the Eastern Palzearctic Region, one species being found
as a rare and sporadic straggler in the Western Palearctic Region. In habits these birds assi-
milate closely to the species belonging to the genus Pterocles. They are gregarious, frequently
consorting together in large flocks, and inhabit vast steppes and sand plains. Their flight is
extremely rapid; and they make a peculiar whistling sound when flying. In the morning
and evening they resort to their regular drinking-places, which are frequently far distant from
their feeding-grounds. Their call-note is a somewhat melodious chuckle, which is often uttered
when they are on the wing. They feed on soft shoots, seeds, and berries of various kinds which
are found in the steppes. They do not construct any nest, but place their eggs in a depression
in the ground, usually depositing three buff eggs, marked with dark brown. The young birds
when hatched are covered with down, and are able to shift for themselves, like the young of
the Galline.
Syrrhaptes paradoxus, the type of the genus, has the bill very small, straight, gradually
decurved from the base to the point, which, though obtuse, is sharp-edged; nostrils basal,
concealed by the frontal feathers; wings very long and pointed, the first quill longest, and
haying the tip much elongated and attenuate; tail rather long, much graduated, the central
rectrices much elongated, and attenuated to fine points; legs short, closely feathered to the
toes, which are only separated close to the claws; soles of the feet rugous; claws stout, curved,
obtuse.
161
(
~~
in se i‘) s
sei UE
SNe hk WE jis,
466
durt
yveyue HN YW
SNXOGVYVd SALdVHYUAS
“ASNOYDONVS SV11Vd
YY suwwensy'n Pp
SYRRHAPTES PARADOXUS.
(PALLAS’S SAND-GROUSE.)
Tetrao paradoxa, Pall. Reise Russ. Reichs, ii. App. p. 712, tab. F (1773).
Syrrhaptes, lig. (Letrao paradoxa, Pall.), Prodr. p. 243 (1811).
Syrrhaptes pallasit, Temm. Pig. et Gallin. iii. p. 282 (1815).
Heteroclitus tartaricus, Vieill. Nouv. Dict. xiv. p. 453 (1817).
Syrrhaptes paradoaus (Pall.), Licht. in Eversm. Reise nach Buchara, p. 134 (1823).
Syrrhaptes heteroclita, Vieill. Gal. des Ois. pt. iii. p. 64 (1825).
Syrrhapte paradoxal, French; Fausthuhn, German; Steppehone, Danish.
Figure notabiles.
Temminck, Pl. Col. 95; Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 32. fig. 12; Sundevall, Svensk. Fogl. pl. 73.
fig. 4; Gould, B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 11; Radde, Reis. Siid. Ost-Sib. ii. pl. 2; Ibis, 1860,
pl. iv.; Stevenson, B. of Norf. pl. 2.
¢ ad. pileo et capitis lateribus aureo-flavis, fronte vix nigro striata : nucha griseo-cerviné, collo postico cano-
cervino plagd aurantiaca notato: corpore supra cum scapularibus arenaceo-ochraceis, nigro-fasciatis,
uropygio fasciis angustioribus notato: remigibus primaris pallidé czruleo-canis, primo in pogonio
externo nigro et ad apicem valdé attenuato et elongato, sequentibus versus apicem attenuatis, primariis
intimis versus apicem nigris et ochraceo terminatis, secundariis in pogonio interno ochraceis et extis
nigris vix ochraceo marginatis: tectricibus alarum arenaceo-ochraceis, marginibus nigro-guttatis,
tectricibus majoribus rufescente castaneo terminatis: supracaudalibus et rectricibus centralibus in
parte basali ochraceis ceruleo-cano notatis, his valdé elongatis et attenuatis, versus apicem nigri-
cantibus, rectricibus reliquis schistaceo-cinereis albo terminatis et in pogonio interno ochraceo mar-
ginatis: mento pallidé flavido; gula supremé aurantiacd: corpore reliquo subtus cano-cervino, versus
erissum albido: abdomine plag&é magna nigro fasciaté et plumis in pectore versus apicem nigro
transfasciatis fasciam formantibus: subcaudalibus nigris vix ochraceo notatis et conspicué albo mar-
ginatis: rostro pallidé corneo: iride fuscé: pedibus lanatis.
2 ad. capite et collo haud aurantiaco et flavo notatis, sed pileo et nuchd nigro striatis, corpore supra magis
nigro variegato, tectricibus alarum ubique nigro guttatis, primario primo et rectricibus centralibus
minus elongatis, et corpore subtts sordidiore et grisescentiore quam in mare, gula nigro fasciata et
pectoris lateribus nigro guttatis,
Adult Male (Tientsin, December). Crown and sides of the head dull golden-yellow, the forehead slightly
striated with black; nape greyish buff; across the hind neck is a patch of golden-orange, which extends
upwards on each side, rest of the hind neck buffy dove-grey ; back and scapulars warm sandy ochreous,
boldly barred with black, the rump similarly coloured, but the bars are narrower; primary quills
delicate blue-grey, the outer ones much pointed, the first black on the outer web and having the tip
very long and attenuated, the inner primaries black towards the tip, and broadly terminated with warm
24
2
ochreous; secondaries ochreous on the inner web, and black on the outer web, slightly margined with
ochreous ; wing-coverts sandy ochreous, spotted with black along the edge of the wing, the larger
coverts terminated with deep fox-red, almost chestnut ; tail-coverts, and central rectrices on the basal
portion, warm ochreous marked with blue-grey, the central rectrices very much elongated and attenuated,
the terminal portion being blackish ; remaining rectrices dark slate-grey, broadly tipped with white, and
marked with warm ochreous on the margin of the inner web; chin pale yellowish ; upper throat golden-
orange; rest of the underparts delicate dove-buff with a grey tinge, fading to dull white on the lower
abdomen ; across the centre of the body is a broad black band, and the upper breast is crossed by a band
formed by the tips of the feathers being barred with black; under tail-coverts black, slightly varied
with warm ochreous, and very broadly margined with white; bill pale horn-colour; iris dark brown ;
legs and feet covered with short, buffy white. feathers. Total length about 15 inches, culmen 0°5,
wing 9:0, first primary extending 1:1 beyond the second, tail 7-6, central rectrices extending 3°6 beyond
the rest, tarsus 1:1.
Adult Female (Cologne). Differs from the male in lacking the yellow and orange colour on the head and
neck, the crown and nape being striated with black; the upper parts are more varied with black; the
wing-coverts are spotted with black; the first primary and central rectrices are much less elongated
than in the male; the underparts are duller and greyer; the upper throat crossed by a black band; the
~ sides of the upper breast and neck are boldly spotted with black.
Young Male (Tientsin). Differs from the old male in having the yellow on the head duller, the crown
marked with black; the upper parts marked more as in the female; the sides of the neck spotted with
black, and the band across the lower throat wanting.
AN inhabitant of the Asiatic steppes, and found as far east as China, the present species has been
met with as a straggler in many parts of Europe. Professor Newton, in his comprehensive
article on the irruption of this species in 1863 (Ibis, 1864, pp. 185-222), gives details of 148
instances of its occurrence in that year, and estimates that the invading host which then visited
Europe could not well have numbered less than 700 individuals. Previous to 1863 it was
scarcely known as a European bird. Moschler (Naumannia, iii. p. 305) first recorded it as being
found in Europe, and included it in a list of the birds occurring at Sarepta, on the Lower Volga ;
and in 1859 several examples were obtained. One was obtained at Walpole St. Peter's, in
Norfolk, early in July; a second near Tremadoc, in Wales, on the 9th of that month; a third
near Hobro, in Jutland, on the 23rd of July; and a fourth near Landvoort, in Holland.
Besides these, Professor Newton (/. c.) states that one was obtained at New Romney, in Kent,
in November 1859; and in May, in the same year, a pair are stated to have been killed in
the Wilna Government, in Russia.
As Professor Newton has gone into such close details in his article above quoted, I need
only name the different localities enumerated by him where it was met with in 1863, and refer.
to his paper for fuller details. The largest number appear to have been recorded from England ;
in Norfolk and Suffolk alone about seventy specimens were obtained. The localities in
England enumerated by Professor Newton are Waxham, Winterton, Kessingland, Horsey,
Breydon, Thorpe, Alderton, Sizewell, Sherringham, Morston, Mersea, Dungeness, Lydd, Elmley,
Croxton, Elveden, Wangford, Holme, Methwold, Bexhill, Fordham, Pevensey, Eastbourne, Saffron
Walden, Saltfleet, Alford, Swaffham Prior, Leake, Cottenham, Oakington, Barrington, Forest
3
Gate, Louth, Boston, Royston, Balcombe, North Burton, Barnet, Bridlington, Peterborough,
Skidby, Flotmanby, Whitby, Aldershot, Farnsfield, York, Teesmouth, Whitburn, Sheffield,
Farsley, Cowpen, Thropton, Ryton, Embleton, Ross Links, Belford, Berwick-on-Tweed, Imber,
Eccleshall, Kilcot, Warrington, Ludlow, Penrith, Oswestry, Leasowe, Walney, Slapton, Heanton,
Haverfordwest, Land’s End, St. Agnes. In Ireland it was recorded from Balbriggan, Ross,
Drumbeg, and Naran; and in Scotland from Muchalls, Hoylake, Stirling, Dornoch, Renfrew-
shire; and from Unst, in the Shetland Isles.
It was met with as far north as the Feroes; for one was found dead in the sea late in May,
near Thorshayn, two males were killed in June, and two others were obtained at the same time,
but not shot; and they remained on the island as late as September. Mr. R. Collett says (Norg.
Fugle, p. 44) that “‘it appeared in flocks in the southern and western portions of Norway in the
summer and autumn of 1863, and several specimens were obtained. A flock of fourteen to
fifteen individuals was first observed at Mandel about the middle of August, out of which two
were shot and sent by Dr. Roscher to the University Museum. Subsequently specimens were
shot at Oieren and in Lauerdal; along the west coast five were shot in Lindaas, in Nordhordland,
north of Bergen, and two on the Nordfjord, in 62° N. lat.” Professor Sundevall says that it also
occurred in Sweden in 1863. Two were shot in July at Sandsj6, near Filipstad; and on the 10th
November three were seen on the east coast of Southern Oland, one of which was shot by
Mr. C. G. Kindberg. According to Reinhardt one was obtained on Gottland; and two more are
recorded in the Jag. Forb. Tidskrift, 1864; and Mr. Wheelwright stated in a letter to the
‘Field’ that three were shot at Nykoping in May 1863. I do not find any record of its occur-
rence in Finland. Mr. Sabandaeff informs me that it has been once obtained near Moscow, in
1863, and that there is, according to Mr. Oulianin, a specimen in the Museum at Archangel
which was killed near that town. There is also a specimen in the collection of Mr. Heinrichs
which was shot in 1863 near Archangel. In North Germany it appears to have occurred in
many localities during the -irruption of 1863. Professor Newton (J. ¢c.) enumerates many
instances of its having been met with; and Hintz records (J. f. O. 1864, p. 194) the occurrence
of one between Belgard and Coslin. Mr. A. Benzon informs me that the first were met with in
Denmark on the 23rd July, 1859, and in 1863 it appeared in flocks, and some bred there.
Professor Newton gives (J. c.) some interesting extracts respecting the breeding-habits as observed
there, which I transcribe below. In Heligoland it appears to have been numerous in May and
June; and nearly thirty were shot in the former month, and five in the latter. A large flock was
observed in the autumn on Norderney ; and flocks of from fifteen to one hundred appeared on the
21st May, on Borkum, where none were seen from the 23rd June to the Ist July, when large
flocks returned, and until September examples were observed and obtained there. In Holland
and Belgium it appears to have occurred in many localities; and, according to Heer Crommelin,
it is said to have bred in the vicinity of Harlem: Professor Newton give the following localities
where it has occurred, viz. Groningen, Weert, Rocour, Velzen, Landvoort, Nordwijk, Wasse-
naar, St. Quentin, Lille, Ostend, Bergues, and Somme. Messrs. Degland and Gerbe say that in
1863 it was generally distributed throughout the basins of the Seine, the Loire, the Gironde, and
the Rhone, in the Departments of the Somme and the Aube from June to September, in Vendée
in November, and near Metz, on the Moselle, in February 1864. Mr. Howard Saunders informs
2H2
77
78
4
me that there is an adult specimen in the Museum of Perpignan obtained in the market of that
town on the 18th October, 1859. In Italy the first were obtained in May 1865, near Predazzo,
when one out of a flock of ten or twelve was shot by an Austrian officer near Belluno; a second
was brought to the market of Treviso; another was taken near Rimini, and one near Carpigiano,
in the Modenese. In 1864 one was obtained near Friuli, in January, and one at Novara about the
middle of February. In Sicily it has not occurred ; for Mr. Howard Saunders writes to me that
he was in error in citing it as having been obtained near Syracuse, the mistake having arisen in
transcribing his rough notes, in which only the vernacular name had been written, the bird
referred to being a male Pterocles alchata. According to Dr. Anton Fritsch several were killed
in Bohemia, chiefly in the southern portions: the first was obtained at Dobris, and another at
one of the gates of Prague. ‘There are several instances on record of its occurrence in Austria.
Ritter von Tschusi-Schmidhofen informs me that Pfarrer Jukovits obtained a male in May and a
female in June 1863 near the Neusiedler lake, and in January 1864 a third specimen; others
were observed in February and March.
4 fi ie)
> Fae
eva d PeRdae
vf
1
cf
ae
ny
(acs
469
YITT YORTY WWesny Pp
“SNOIHD1IO9N SNNVISVHd
“INVSWaAHd
1p
Slee Nia
PHASIANUS COLCHICUS.
(PHEASANT.)
Phasianus, Briss. Orn. i. p. 262 (1760).
Phasianus varius, Briss. tom. cit. p. 267, pl. xxv. fig. 3 (1760).
Phasianus colchicus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 271 (1766).
Le Faisan, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. ii. p. 328 (1771).
Phasianus marginatus, Wolf, Taschenb. deutsch. Vogelk. i. p. 291 (1810).
Faisan, French; Fagiano, Italian ; Edelfasan, German.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 121, 122; Frisch, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 123, 124; Naumann, Vog.
Deutschl. taf. 162; Sundevall, Svensk. Fog]. pl. 74. fig. 2; Gould, B. of Eur. pl. 247;
id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 12; Bettoni, Ucc. Lomb. pl. 57; Elliot, Monogr. Phas. 11. pl. 2.
6 ad. pileo viridi-nigro : collo superiore nigro, purpureo violaceo nitente, collo imo et dorsi plumis aurantiacis
nigro marginatis et notatis, scapularibus et plumis in dorso imo magis zeneo-rufescentibus et cervino
notatis : remigibus fuscis ochraceo transfasciatis : tectricibus alarum olivaceo-aurantiacis eneo-purpureo
et ochraceo variegatis; uropygio et supracaudalibus rufescentibus purpureo tinctis: cauda olivaceo-
aurantiacé nigro transfasciata, rectricibus centralibus rufescente neo marginatis: pectore et hypo-
chondriis aurantiacis nigro marginatis: abdomine centraliter ceeruleo-nigro: rostro corneo-albo, parte
nuda in faciei lateribus coccinea: pedibus fuscis: iride saturaté fusca.
© ad. corpore supra cum capite et collo ochraceo-cervinis, nigro et nigro-fusco notatis et fasciatis: collo et
pectore vix vinaceo tinctis: corpore subttis ochraceo-cervino, nigricanti vermiculato et sparsé eodem
colore notato: rectricibus centraliter nigro-fuscis, ochraceo et fulvido variegatis, et lateraliter ochraceis
nigricanti vermiculatis: capitis lateribus haud nudis.
Adult Male (Ismidt, 20th January). Crown and nape black, richly glossed with bottle-green ; sides of the
head, except the bare portion, chin, and upper throat and neck blackish, richly glossed with violet-
purple; feathers on the lower neck, breast, and fore part of the back black on the basal portion, then
rufescent golden, margined with black, many having an apical black spot; on the scapulars and rest of
the back the golden hue deepens into coppery purple, and most of the feathers have a central horse-
shoe-shaped buff mark ; quills dark brown, slightly barred with ochreous buff; wing-coverts golden
olivaceous, varied with coppery purple and ochreous; rump and upper tail-coverts rich fiery reddish,
glossed with purple; tail golden-olivaceous with central bars of black, the central feathers margined
with fiery purple; flanks like the breast, but more golden-orange in tinge; centre of the abdomen
black with a bluish tinge; bill pale whitish horn; wattles on the sides of the head rich vermilion-red
or blood-red; legs dull brown; iris deep brown. ‘Total length about 33 inches, culmen 1:2, wing 9°3,
tail 18°2, central rectrices 13:5, longer than the outside ones, tarsus 2:7.
Adult Female (Ismidt). Upper parts generally black, the feathers broadly margined with clay-buff, the neck
washed with warm vinaceous; underparts clay-buff, vermiculated with blackish, the black bases of the
ee)
2
feathers showing through here and there, especially on the flanks and neck, which latter with the upper
breast is faintly washed with vinous; chin clay-yellow; quills and wing-coverts dark brown, richly
variegated with clay-buff; centre of tail-feathers blackish, variegated with ochreous and dull rufescent,
the rest of the feathers being dull clay-ochreous vermiculated with blackish; sides of head feathered,
and not bare; bill browner than in the male; legs dull brown; iris deep brown.
Young. In their first-feather plumage the young of both sexes resemble the female; but the young male
assumes the plumage of the old male in the autumnal moult, but at first the coloration of his plumage
is duller, and his tail is shorter than in the fully adult bird.
Young in down. Sides of the head, throat, and underparts yellowish white; forehead dull rusty yellowish
with a dark brown central stripe, which broadens towards the nape; behind the ear is a black spot;
upper parts generally yellowish, variegated with rusty red and brown, and with blackish brown stripes ;
bill reddish white, brownish above; legs yellowish white; iris greyish.
When the young bird is eight or ten days old the quills commence to shoot out; and the bird is soon able to
flutter along.
THE present species is now tolerably widely distributed in temperate Europe, but almost every-
where in a nearly semidomesticated state, except in the south-eastern countries, where it is ina
really wild condition; and there alone the true species, without admixture of other blood, is to
be found. It is, however, a species which has been introduced by the agency of man; and the
generally accepted tradition is that the Argonauts when returning from Colchis with the golden
fleece brought with them to Greece some live Pheasants, by which Greece was stocked with
these birds. ‘This species has long been thoroughly acclimatized in Great Britain, having been,
so far as one can judge, introduced by the Romans; yet this is merely a conjecture, as there is
no direct evidence to show how and when it first came to our shores—though it was certainly
naturalized here prior to the Norman conquest; for Mr. Boyd Dawkins writes (Ibis, 1869,
p. 358) :—“ It may interest your readers to know that the most ancient record of the occurrence
of the Pheasant in Great Britain is to be found in the tract ‘ De inventione Sanctz Crucis nostre
in Monte Acuto et de ductione ejusdem apud Waltham, edited from manuscripts in the British
Museum by Professor Stubbs, and published in 1861. The bill of fare drawn up by Harold for
the Canons’ households of from six to seven persons, A.D. 1059, and preserved in a manuscript of
the date of circa 1177, was as follows (p. 16) :—
“<«Brant autem tales pitantee unicuique canonico: a festo Sancti Michaelis usque ad caput
jejunii (Ash Wednesday) aut xii merul, aut ii agausez [Agace, a Magpie (?) Ducange] aut ii
perdices, aut unus phasianus, reliquis temporibus aut ance [Geese ; Ducange| aut galline.’
“Now the point of this passage is that it shows that Phasianus colchicus had become
naturalized in England before the Norman invasion; and as the English and Danes were not
the introducers of strange animals in any well-authenticated case, it offers fair presumptive
evidence that it was introduced by the Roman conquerors, who naturalized the Fallow Deer
in Britain.
“The eating of Magpies at Waltham, though singular, was not so remarkable as the eating
of horse by the monks of St. Galle in the time of Charles the Great, and the returning of thanks
to God for it:—
9
2)
«Sit feralis equi caro dulcis sub cruce Christi! The bird was not so unclean as the horse
—the emblem of Paganism—was unholy.”
In the reign of Edward I. Pheasants were sold at eight pence per brace; and I may remark
that, according to Mr. Robert Gray, the first mention made of the Pheasant in old Scots Acts is
in one dated 8th June 1594, in which, amongst other birds and beasts, the Pheasant is scheduled
as a protected species.
In Great Britain the Pheasant is found in most large preserves, from the extreme south up
to Sutherland and the Outer Hebrides. Mr. Robert Gray says (B. of W. of Scotl. p. 224) that
it is commonly distributed throughout the western counties, extending from Sutherland to the
shores of Wigtown. In the neighbourhood of Loch Lomond it is occasionally seen on the
mountain-sides as high as 1200 feet. It was introduced into Lewis, in the Outer Hebrides,
by Sir James Matheson, and has become fairly established there. Other species have also been
introduced into Scotland, as for instance Phasianus versicolor and Phasianus reevesii; and both
these have crossed with the present species, so that it is, as elsewhere, most difficult to find a
pure-blooded Phasianus colchicus.
In Ireland, according to Thompson, the Pheasant “is common in various wooded parts of
the island, where it has been preserved and protected. This species being neither an indigenous
one, nor a visitant to Ireland in a wild state, but having certainly been introduced, is therefore
disentitled to receive the honours of ordinary type. The period of its introduction is unknown
to me; but in the year 1589 it was remarked to be common. Fynes Moeyson, who was in
Treland from 1599 till 1605, observes that there are ‘such plenty of Pheasants as I have known
sixty served up at one feast, and abound much more with Rails, but Partridges are somewhat
scarce. —Vol. ii. p. 368. Smith seems to have imagined that Pheasants were indigenous to the
island, as in his ‘ History of Cork’ it is remarked, ‘they are now (1749) indeed very rare, most
999
of our woods being cut down.
In Sweden and Norway the Pheasant is only found domesticated ; and it is known in Southern
Russia only, and not in Northern Russia or Poland. In North Germany it has become wild in
some few localities, but otherwise it is only met with in preserves; and, according to Mr. Collin,
it is kept in a state of semidomestication at Kongelunden, on Amager, in Denmark. Naumann
says that it is now quite wild in several parts of Bohemia, on the Danube, the Rhine, and in the
lowlands of the Elbe, but that north of Central Germany it is found nowhere, unless preserved.
Dr. Rey informs me that it occurs here and there in an almost wild state in Saxony. According
to Baron Fallon it is acclimatized here and there in Belgium; Mr. Labouchere informs me that
it thrives well in the drier portions of Holland; and in France it is found in many preserves. [
do not find it recorded from Portugal or Spain; and in Italy, Salvadori says, it is only to be met
with in a semidomesticated state, and never really wild; and Mr. Jesse remarks that a few are
found on the east coast of Corsica. It is, however, wild in Greece; but Dr. Krtiper mentions
that it is now nearly extinct in the swamps of Acarnania, but is tolerably numerous in Olympus,
and is shot there annually.
In winter it is not uncommon in Macedonia, but only in the plains. Lord Lilford writes
(Ibis, 1860, p. 237) :—“* The only localities in which I have myself seen Pheasants in these parts
were :—once on the Luro river, near Preyesa, in March 1857, on which occasion I only saw one,
the bird having never previously been met with in that part of the country; and again in
5N
37
4
December of the same year, in the forests near the mouth of the river Drin, in Albania, where
it is comparatively common, and where several fell to our guns. In this latter locality the
Pheasant’s habitat seems to be confined to a radius of from twenty to thirty miles to the north,
east, and south of the town of Alessio—a district for the most part densely wooded, and well
watered, with occasional tracts of cultivated ground, Indian corn being apparently the principal
produce, and forming, with the berries of the privet (which abounds throughout Albania), the
chief food of the present species. We heard many more Pheasants than we saw, as the woods
were thick and of great extent, our dogs wild, and we lost a great deal of time in making circuits
to cross or avoid the numerous small but deep streams which intersect the country in every
direction. This species is particularly abundant on the shores of the Gulf of Salonica, about the
mouth of the river Vardar; and I have been informed, on good authority, that Pheasants are
also to be found in the woods of Vhrakori, in Aitolia, about midway between the Gulfs of
Lepanto and Arta.”
As above stated, it is tolerably numerous in Southern Germany; but Dr. Fritsch says that it
is not so common as it used to be, for in 1857 the total number shot in Bohemia was 50609,
whereas in 1864 it had dwindled to 39296. Messrs. Danford and Harvie-Brown say (Ibis, 1875,
p- 418) that it used formerly to be rather common in the preserves of some of the nobles of
Transylvania, but during the revolution of 1848 most were destroyed, and they are not certain
that it now exists there at all. According to Messrs. Elwes and Buckley (Ibis, 1870, p. 329), the
Pheasant ‘exists in a wild state in many parts of Turkey, especially in Macedonia and the north
of Albania. We found Pheasants chiefly in the marshy forests of the plains; but, owing to the
extreme density of the brambles, they were very difficult to flush, and, when put up by the dogs,
would sometimes fly into a.tree. A good many are found in the coverts round the foot of Mount
Olympus and the vale of Tempe; but they are becoming scarcer. There cannot be many in
Roumelia; for when they were required for the Sultan’s aviaries, he sent to Salonica to have
them caught.”
In Southern Russia, Mr. Artzibascheff says, the Pheasant is occasionally seen on the Sarpa,
but he himself never met with it; and Professor Von Nordmann states that though it is not
found in a wild state in New Russia, it occurs along the eastern side of the Black Sea, and thence
eastwards down to the Caucasus. Mr. G. C. Taylor, however, says that he never saw it wild in
the Crimea. Asia Minor is the true home of the Pheasant; and Mr. Pearse informs me that
large numbers are sent to the Constantinople market from Asiatic Turkey. It appears, however,
to be locally distributed there; for Mr. Danford does not include it in his list, and Canon
Tristram remarks (Ibis, 1868, p. 212) that though he observed it wild near Ephesus, it does not
appear to be known in Syria. Ménétriés says that it is common in the Caucasus, near the Terek
and Soulak rivers, and even in the mountains of Bechtan, near the mineral waters of Petigorsk ;
and according to Mr. Blanford it abounds in the forests of the Caspian, and ranges through the
forest-region of Mazandaran as far east as the upper valley of the Gurgan. Travellers have
recorded it from the jungles of the Harirud valley, but do not appear to have seen it. In other
portions of Asia the present bird is replaced by many allied species, for particulars respecting
which I may refer my readers to Mr. Elliot’s magnificent work, ‘ Monograph of the Phasianide,’
in which are plates of almost all the known species, executed by Wolf.
The Pheasant, one of our best-known and most highly valued game-birds, is essentially an
5
inhabitant of the woodlands, though not of the true forest; for it affects groves where there are
small patches covered with low bushes and tangled herbage here and there, hazel coppices, and
non-evergreen patches of woodland where it is not too dry, and also swampy localities in the
woods; but one seldom sees them on bleak open hill-sides or in the pine-forests, unless, as
Naumann remarks, to seek shelter from severe weather. Places where there are cornfields near
are especially suitable to this species; for it thrives exceedingly well where it can find an abun-
dance of food near its woodland haunts. It is, as a rule, found on the ground, where it wanders
about in search of food, usually in places where the undergrowth is tolerably close; but in the
heat of the day it is fond of sunning and dusting itself, like our domestic fowl. It scratches a
good deal where the soil is suitable, and picks the insects and seeds out of the ground as it turns
them up. When undisturbed it steps sedately and quietly along, the long tail being held almost
horizontal or slightly elevated, the head rather erect, and the ear-tufts invisible; but directly its
suspicions are excited, and it apprehends danger, these tufts are at once erected, and are very
easily discernible even at some distance. When it takes alarm it stretches its neck, erects its
tail somewhat, and usually runs for a short distance before taking wing, dropping again into the
cover after it has flown a short distance, and seldom flying far.
In the spring of the year the cock Pheasant’s pairing-note or crow may frequently be heard,
usually in the early morning, when he flies down from his roost and calls the females round him.
This crow or call somewhat resembles the feeble attempts of a domestic cock, and is followed,
not preceded, by a clapping of the wings.
The Pheasant is polygamous; and in the spring of the year desperate combats often take
place for the possession of the females, for the cock Pheasant is extremely pugnacious. When
making advances towards the females this bird, like the common cock, depresses and opens its
wing nearest to the hen bird, the tail being expanded and thrown sideways, the ear-tufts being
greatly erected, and the bright-red skin round the eye being swollen and much more extended
than at other seasons of the year.
The usual note of the Pheasant is a tolerably loud call, like the words cock-cock-cock, which
is almost always uttered when the bird suddenly flies up into a tree, and when it takes up its
quarters for the night; and on a quiet evening one can, without any great difficulty, count the
number of cocks in a small plantation, and even ascertain the trees on which they roost.
The food of the Pheasant varies greatly according to the season of the year. In the winter
it feeds chiefly on grain and seeds of various kinds, insects of almost all sorts being added to its
bill of fare as soon as the spring opens; in the summer it devours insects, the tender shoots of
plants, &c. &c., fruits of various kinds as they ripen; and in the autumn it feeds on ripe seeds,
berries, &c. &c. Amongst the vegetable substances it feeds on I may enumerate grain of various
kinds, wheat, buckwheat, lentils, oats, barley, rape-seed, peas, linseed, the seeds of many sorts
of grasses &c. (such as Panicum, Polygonum aviculare, P. dumetorum, P. convolvulus, various
species of Melampyrum), acorns, beech-mast, the seeds of the hemp nettle (Galeopsis), the tender
shoots of grasses, clover, cabbages, pimpernel, young peas, the roots of the common silver weed
(Potentilla anserina), the tubers of the common buttercup and pilewort (Ranunculus bulbosus
and Ranunculus ficaria), the yellow flowers of the latter plant, berries of many kinds, such as
the hawthorn (Crategus), mulberries, currants, brambles, red and black elderberries, mistletoe-
5N 2
og
90
6
berries. Fruits it will eat readily, such as wild strawberries, plums, apples, pears, raspberries ;
and amongst the insects it devours are may-bugs, grasshoppers, beetles of various kinds, spiders,
flies, larvee of different sorts, the small excrescences on the underside of the leaves of the oak, so-
called spangles, wire worms (of which as many as twelve hundred have been found in the crop of
a hen Pheasant); and this bird has been known to eat a slowworm.
As above stated, the Pheasant is polygamous, an old and strong cock having a harem of
from six to nine females, though at first he will sometimes commence by keeping company with
one hen, from which circumstance the older naturalists have in error concluded that it lives, as
a rule, in monogamy. When the female wants to lay she withdraws to some quiet place, where,
in the dense grass-growth of a thicket, in an old hedgerow, or in a field near a covert, she
scratches a depression in the soil, which is lined with dried grasses, roots, and leaves, and in this
deposits from eight to twelve eggs. Occasionally two females will have one nest in common;
and an instance is cited by Mr. Tegetmeier of a Pheasant and a Partridge having such a nest,
the eggs of the two species being laid indiscriminately together; and both birds were found
sitting side by side in perfect amity. Occasionally, though very rarely, the hen Pheasant will
lay in the deserted nest of an Owl or a Squirrel; but, as a rule, it is a ground-breeder. When
the young are hatched they are very carefully tended by the old bird, and fed chiefly on insects,
the larvee of ants, so-called ants’ eggs being a particularly favourite article of food, the old female
placing them before the young ones and encouraging them to pick them up like a domestic hen.
When first hatched they are very tender, and require great care on the part of the mother, who
collects them and covers them during bad weather and at night ; but when about half-grown they
are able to fly up and roost on a branch with the old bird.
The present species, as above stated, not only breeds freely with other allied Pheasants, but
it has been known also to cross with the domestic Fowl, the Guineafowl, the Black Grouse; and,
according to Edwards, it has paired with the Turkey. The birds which are known amongst
sportsmen by the name of Mule Pheasants, however, are not hybrids but barren hen birds, either
yery old birds or else those suffering from a disease or derangement of the generative organs,
which have to a larger or less extent assumed the dress of the male bird, I possess two, and
have examined several more, of these barren hens, all of which differed a good deal in beauty
of plumage, one being almost as richly coloured and marked as the adult male.
The eggs of the Pheasant are uniform pale olivaceons brown in colour, and average about
132 by 126 inch.
The specimens figured are an adult pair obtained especially for me in Asia Minor by
Mr. Pearse of Constantinople; for, after considerable trouble, I found that I could not get a
specimen here in England without some admixture of one of the allied species. The specimen
nearest to the really wild bird is one I received from Captain Elwes, which differs only in having
the markings rather broader and bolder, especially on the upper parts.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,d, 6,2. Near Ismid, Asia Minor, January 20th, 1878 (C. Pearse). c,d ad. Colesbourne Park, November
20th, 1870 (A. J. Hlwes). d, 2 steril. Leadenhall Market, October 1875. e, 2 steril. Middleton Hall,
Tamworth (Hanbury-Barclay).
Genus CACCABIS.
Perdiz apud Brisson, Orn. i. p. 236 (1760).
Tetrao apud Linneus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 276 (1766).
Caccabis, Kaup, Natiirl. Syst. p. 183 (1829).
Alectoris apud Kaup, op. cit. p. 180 (1829).
Chacura apud Hodgson, Madr. Journ. 1837, p. 505.
Pyctes apud Hodgson in Gray’s Zool. Misc. p. 85 (1844).
Tue Red-legged Partridges inhabit the Palearctic, Ethiopian, and Oriental Regions, four species
inhabiting the Western Palearctic Region. They resemble the common Partridge in habits
more than any of their allies, frequenting cultivated ground, fields, &c.; but some species are
more frequently found in rugged mountainous localities, especially where there is close low
scrub. ‘They are very swift on foot; and when disturbed they prefer to run, or even to squat, in
preference to taking wing. They fly, however, extremely fast when once on the wing, and will
frequently traverse considerable distances. They have also a peculiar habit of flying up into a
tree ; and a covey may occasionally be seen sitting in a row on a fence or the roof of a barn.
They feed on grain, seeds, fruit, and insects of various kinds, and often obtain their food by
scratching. ‘They are also partial to dusting themselves in sandy soil, and to basking in the
sun.
They nest on the ground, making a depression in the soil in some well-concealed place,
which they line with grasses, leaves, and sometimes with feathers, and deposit numerous buff-
coloured eggs slightly marked with pale red.
Caccabis rufa, the type of the genus, has the bill short, stout, straight to the nostrils, then
decurved to the point, which is rounded and thin-edged; nostrils basal, lateral, covered above
with an exposed oblong horny operculum, the nasal groove broad and feathered; eyelids and a
very small space behind the eye bare; wings moderately long, broad, the first quill shorter than
the fifth, the third longest; tail moderately short, rounded; legs moderate; tarsus anteriorly
scutellate and without any spur behind; anterior toes long, united at the base, the outer and
inner ones about equal in length; hind toe small; claws moderately long, slightly curved,
moderately sharp.
J1
ane dis ree, iat
ty
a Taped iowa: otheecen| ae re +
ini bisctaly Grifs
470
GREEK PARTRIDGE.
CACCABIS SAXATILIS
276
CACCABIS SAXATILIS.
(GREEK PARTRIDGE.)
Perdix greca, Briss. Orn. i. p. 241 (1760, partim).
Tetrao rufus, Scop. Ann. I. Hist. Nat. p. 120 (1769, nec Linn.).
Le Bartavelle ou Perdrix grecque, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. ii. p. 420 (1771).
Perdix saxatilis, Meyer, Vig. Deutschl. part viii. (1805).
Caccabis, Kaup (Perdix saxatilis, Meyer), Natiirl. Syst. p. 183 (1829).
Perdix rupestris, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 522 (1831).
Chacura greca, G. R. Gray, List of Gen. of B. p. 79 (1841).
Caccabis greca, G. R. Gray, Gen. of Birds, iii. p. 508 (1849).
'Caccabis saxatilis (Meyer), W. H. Simpson, Ibis, 1860, p. 388.
Bartavelle, French; Steinhuhn, Berghuhn, German; Cotornice, Italian.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 231; Gould, B. of Eur. pl. 261. fig. 2; Naumann, Vog. Deutschl.
taf. 164; Frisch, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 116.
3 ad. fronte, plumis circum basin rostri et strid magné per oculos ducté et in gula ima confluente nigris :
pileo cano, in parte frontali et lateraliter fere albo: nuch& cand vix cervino tinct&: corpore supra
cerulescenti-cano, dorso vinaceo lavato: remigibus saturaté fuscis, primariis in pogonio externo versus
apicem fere omnino ochraceis, secundariis extus albicante ochraceo marginatis, secundariis intimis dorso
concoloribus sed brunneo vix lavatis: tectricibus alarum minoribus vinaceo marginatis: rectricibus
centralibus czrulescenti-canis, reliquis ferrugineis, ad basin czerulescenti-canis: mento et gula albis:
pectore czerulescenti-cano, plumis vix cervino marginatis: abdomine et subcaudalibus ochraceis: hypo-
chondriis czruleo, nigro et albo variis et castaneo apicatis: rostro et pedibus rubris: iride fusca.
2 ad, mari similis sed minor et paullo sordidior.
Adult Male (Naples, 15th February). Forehead, feathers at the base of the bill all round, and a broad stripe
passing through and behind the eye, down the sides of the neck, where it broadens and meets in front,
black ; crown blue-grey, or dove-blue, nearly pure white round the margin, where it meets the black, and
on the nape tinged with vinous buff; upper parts dove-blue, on the back washed with warm vinous, the
lesser wing-coverts margined with this latter colour; quills dark brown, the outer web of the primaries
towards the tip almost entirely warm ochre, secondaries margined externally with yellowish white ; the
inner secondaries and scapulars coloured like the rest of the upper parts, but washed with buffy brown ;
central rectrices doye-blue, the remainder deep fox-red, and blue only on the basal portion, which is
covered by the tail-coverts; chin and throat inside the black band white; breast dove-blue, the feathers
slightly edged with pale buff; abdomen and under tail-coverts warm ochre-yellow; feathers on the
flanks dove-blue, then crossed by a black band, then white, and terminated by a black band slightly
tipped with chestnut-red ; legs, bill, and edge of the eyelid coral-red ; iris dark brown. Total length
about 14 inches, culmen 0°85, wing 6:4, tail 3°9, tarsus 1°7.
95
Oz
oJ
2
Adult Female (Naples, 15th February). Closely resembles the male above described, but is a trifle smaller,
and lacks the knob on the hind part of the tarsus.
Young (Switzerland). Resembles the adult, but is duller, the collar is much narrower, the upper parts are
much darker and browner, and there are traces of bars on the tail; the feathers on the flanks are also
much less richly coloured.
Young in down (Barcelonette). Crown and nape reddish, marked with dark brown; an indistinct dark patch
behind the eye; upper parts blackish brown, variegated with reddish brown and white ; sides of the
head, throat, and underparts white, tinged with buff on the abdomen.
Obs. So far as I can gather, Perdix labatiei of Bouteille (Orn. du Dauphiné, ii. Add. p. 337, 1844) is nothing
but a hybrid between the Greek Partridge and the common Redleg, a view which is taken by Messrs.
Degland and Gerbe, and several other authors.
Ir is somewhat difficult to determine the precise limits of the range of this Partridge, because
in Eastern Europe it is replaced by a closely allied though distinct species, Caccabis chukar,
which latter is the. common Red-legged Partridge of Asia Minor. ‘The present species appears
to inhabit only the elevated mountain-ranges of Southern Europe. It is stated by Messrs.
Degland and Gerbe to inhabit the Pyrenees; but it is not included by Colonel Irby as occurring
in Spain, and Lord Lilford writes (Ibis, 1866, p. 348) that he could not hear of it in any part
of that country ; it is well possible, however, that it may occur in some of the mountain districts
of Spain. Baron J. W. von Miller states that it is found in Provence, but is much rarer than
the common Redleg. In Switzerland it is common; but Bailly writes that though formerly so
numerous in Savoy, it has become rather rare than otherwise. Messrs. Meisner and Schinz say
(Vog. der Schweiz, p. 162) that it is a true alpine bird, inhabiting the entire range of the Swiss
Alps in the more elevated regions, and never visits the subalpine regions, and is, they add,
unknown in the Jura; but Bailly states that it inhabits both the Jura and the Basses-Alpes.
In Italy it is found in the Italian Alps, in the Apennines, and in the mountains of Sicily;
in fact, as Count Salvadori states, it inhabits the entire mountainous regions of Italy, but
it is wanting in Sardinia and Malta. Mr. EH. Benvenuti also states (Ibis, 1864, p. 228) that it
occurs in Tuscany. It likewise inhabits the Tyrol, where it is said to be not uncommon in
some localities, and is also found in the Styrian Alps. Seidensacher says that it inhabits the
Bacher, near Rakovic, near Weitenstein, but is rare; and the Ritter von Tschusi-Schmidhofen
writes to me respecting its range as follows:—“ In the more elevated mountain-ranges of Upper
Austria and Salzburg it is nowhere common. Hanf states that it is numerous in Upper Styria,
on the Grewenze and other Alps of Styria. In Southern Tyrol, according to Althammer, it
breeds commonly, but is less numerous in Northern Tyrol. Bruhin says that it breeds in the
Vorarlberg; Von Hueber states that it also inhabits Carinthia (Karnthen); and Freyer records
it from Krain. Fritsch met with it not uncommonly near Fiume, even in the lowlands; and,
according to Stetter, it is found near Trieste.” Count Casimir Wodzicki met with it in the
Tatra Mountains, Carpathian range, and adds that, according to Professor Zawadzki, it is a
well-known bird throughout the Mountains of Bukowina.
From the Austrian dominions it becomes difficult to trace the range of the present species;
3
but, so far as I can ascertain, it appears to inhabit only the mainland of Greece, the Redleg of
the islands being Caccabis chukar—unless the bird which inhabits the Ionian Islands, of which I
have not been able to examine a specimen, is, as suggested to me by Lord Lilford, the present
species. Canon Tristram possesses an example of C. saxatilis from the mainland of Greece; and
I am indebted to Lord Lilford for the loan of his specimens from Cyprus, which are all referable
to the eastern species. Asa rule the coloration of the throat has been held to be a distinctive
character: but this cannot be depended on; for I find that the specimens of C. chukar brought
from Cyprus by Lord Lilford are, with one exception, nearly as white-throated as examples from
Italy, but they have the feathers at the base of the bill in front of the eye white, and are
undoubtedly referable to the eastern species. ‘There is no doubt that the Red-legged Partridge
which is found near Constantinople is not the present species, but Caccabis chukar; so that this
latter bird certainly occurs in Europe proper.
In its habits the present species differs considerably from its allies; and, as its German
name of Steinhuhn or Rock-chick clearly indicates, it affects the stony serrated portions of the
mountains in preference to the fruitful valleys and lowlands inhabited by the common Redleg
and Barbary Partridge. Bailly says (Orn. de la Sav. ii. p. 469) that it “‘is found in arid rocky
elevated localities, especially those which are difficult of access, and only descends to the plains
or to the lower portions of the mountains during the time when its home is covered with snow,
or when driven down by severe cold, and is very rarely seen away from the higher portions of
the mountains during the breeding-season. When driven from its home by birds of prey or
by sportsmen it will descend, but after the lapse of a few hours will pass from height to height
until it reaches the most elevated localities.
“They pair in the month of March, and are extremely passionate and amorous. The males
challenge each other with loud cries, and will fight with the greatest fury for the possession
of a female, who becomes the prize of the conqueror. Quarrelsome and jealous to a degree,
they will sometimes fight with such perseverance and so blindly that they lose sight of all
caution, and may be shot down with ease. The call-note of the male resembles the syllables
Kakabi kakabet uttered several times in quick succession; and it is varied by a note like the
words cok, cok, cokrro, likewise repeated. By imitating their call-note or that of the female they
may not only be easily approached within range, but frequently come to the gunner who is in
ambush calling them.”
Its flight is heavier and effected with more noise than that of the common Partridge; and it
seldom flies long distances, but soon drops on to the ground and seeks safety on foot, running
with great swiftness, and concealing itself amongst the stones or herbage. Naumann says that
in Switzerland the present species is said occasionally to seek safety by concealing itself amongst
the dense foliage of the fir trees.
As a rule it is a very tame and unsuspicious bird, easy to catch or shoot, and equally easy to
tame; but, as above stated, it is quarrelsome to a degree during the breeding-season.
Its food consists of seeds of various kinds, tender shoots of herbs, and birds, and during the
summer to a large extent of insects of all kinds, coleoptera, grasshoppers, flies, ants, and ant-
laryze, as well as the larvee of many other kinds of insects. Should grain of any kind be planted
in the vicinity of the locality they inhabit, they pay frequent visits to the fields and take their
22
sr)
4
share of the crop. Naumann says that during the more inclement portion of the year, when
other food is scarce, they will feed on the buds of the alpine rose (Rhododendron), as well as
those of the fir, pine, and larch, and berries of the juniper. The young birds when newly
hatched are fed chiefly on ants and their larve. Like the common Partridge, the present species
is fond of dusting itself, and will lie in the sunshine for long with evident pleasure. When
paired the present species lives in strict monogamy; but, as above stated, the males fight viciously
for the possession of the females.
The locality chosen for nidification is always one of the most arid desert places, and always
amongst the rocks, choosing a place where its nest will be best shielded from animals of prey.
Its nest is nothing beyond a hole scratched in the ground and lined with a few leaves or grass-
bents gathered together to form a scanty bed for its eggs. ‘These latter, which are stated
by Bailly to vary in number from nine to eighteen, are deposited in the month of May; but
Naumann writes that it rarely lays before the early part of June, and sometimes not until July,
and that the number of eggs varies between twelve and fifteen, sometimes as many as twenty-four
being deposited.
The eggs of this species are in shape and size similar to those of the common Redleg, but
somewhat larger and much paler, the ground-colour being pale yellowish, and the markings small
and very pale, so that at the first glance the egg looks almost uniform yellowish. Although it is
doubtful whether the appellation “ Greek” Partridge is not more applicable to Caccabis chukar
than to the present species, yet, as the European bird is generally known by that name from the
eastern species, I have deemed it best to retain it for the western bird, and to call Caccabis
chukar by the name used by Dr. Jerdon, viz. Chukor Partridge.
The specimen figured is an adult male from Naples, in the collection of Lord Lilford; and
in the background to the left I have had a specimen of Caccabis chukar from the island of
Rhodes figured for comparison as regards the colour of the throat. In the article on the Chukor
Partridge woodcuts are given of the heads of both that and the present species, to show the very
distinctive character in the distribution of the black at the base of the bill.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a, d ad. Switzerland (Moéschler). 6, 2 jun. Switzerland (Dr. Kutter). c, pull. Near Barcelonette, Basses-
Alpes (£. Fairmaire).
E Mus. Lord Lilford.
a, 3,6, 2. Switzerland (Méschler). c, 3,d, 9. Naples, February 15th, 1875 (Z.).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a, 3,6, 2. Usern, Switzerland (Nager Donazian).
oa
CACCABIS CHUKAR.
(CHUKOR PARTRIDGE.)
Perdix yreca, Briss. Orn. i. p. 241 (1760, partim).
Tetrao rufa, Pall. Zoogr. Rosso-As. ii. p. 79 (1811, nec Linn.).
Perdix chukar, G. R. Gray, in Cuv. Animal Kingd. Griff. ed. iii. p. 54 (1829).
Chacura pugnax, Hodgs. Madr. Journal, 1837, p. 505.
Pyctes (Chacura) chukor, Hodgs. in Gray’s Zool. Misc. p. 85 (1844).
Chacura greca, var., Riipp. Syst. Uebers. p. 106. no. 376 (1845).
Perdiz greca, Eversm. Journ. fiir Orn. 1853, p. 292.
Caccabis rupicola, Licht. Nomencl. Avium, p. 85 (1854).
Chacura chukar (Gray), Heugl. Syst. Uebers. p. 50 (1856).
Perdix altaica, Bp. Compt. Rend. xlii. p. 10 (1856, descr. nulla).
Perdix synaica, Bp. tom. cit. p. 10 (1856, descr. nulla).
Perdix sinaica, Bp. J. f. Orn. 1858, p. 31.
Perdix chukart, Bp. ut supra.
Caccabis saxatilis, Tristr. Ibis, 1859, p. 35 (nec Meyer).
Caccabis chukar, G. R. Gray, List of Galline Brit. Mus. p. 36 (1859).
Chacura sinaitica, Heug). Journ. fiir Orn. 1861, p. 312.
Caccabis chukor (Gray), Jerd. B. of India, iii. p. 564 (1863).
Caccabis chukar, var. pubescens, Swinh. Ibis, 1865, p. 353.
Caccabis synoica (Bp.), G. R. Gray, Hand-l. of B. ii. p. 274 (1870).
Caccabis pallescens, Hume, Lahore to Yarkand, p. 283 (1873).
Caccabis arenarius, Hume, op. cit. p. 283 (1873).
Caccabis pallidus, Hume, op. cit. p. 284 (1873).
Ad, Cacc. saxatili similis, sed corpore supra pallidiore et rufescentiore, fronte et pilei lateribus czerulescenti-
cinereis nec albidis, auricularibus rufescente terminatis, gula ochrascenti-cervina nec alba, plumis ad
basin rostri ante oculos albis nec nigris, scapularibus cerulescenti-canis conspicué ferrugineo mar-
ginatis.
Adult Male (Phandos, Rhodes, 11th December). Resembles Caccadis saxatilis, but has the upper parts
lighter, more rufous, and less grey in tinge; the sides and front of the crown are not nearly white, as
in C. saxatilis, but blue-grey; the auriculars are broadly terminated with rufous, the chin and throat
are yellowish buff, and the space in front of the eye, at the base of the bill, is whitish buff, not
black as in C. savatilis, this last being the best characteristic, and always constant; the scapulars,
especially the upper ones, are dove-blue, broadly margined with rufous, almost fox-red. Total length
about 12 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6:4, tail 3°8, tarsus 1°85.
Female. Similar to the male.
Obs. The present species is subject to great individual variation. After having examined a considerable
3A2
98
2
series I find it impossible to recognize any specific difference between the different races, the chief
difference being that of shade of colour. Mr. Severtzoff, who is at present working with me, also
informs me that every shade of eolour, from the palest to the average Himalayan form, was met with
in the same tract of country by Colonel Przevalsky when collecting in Mongolia. I find also some
slight variation in size, as will be seen from the following table of measurements of examples from
various localities :—
Culmen. Wing. Tail. Tarsus.
inch. inches. inches. inches.
Rhodes, 2, ¢. . . . . 0°80-0:95 5°90-6°5 3°50-3°9 1.65-1°8
Cys og 0 oo oo oo WOR 6:40-6°5 3°50-3°6 1:70-1°8
Asia Minor, 2, 6 . . . 0:85-0:95 5°80-6'1. 3°40-3°6 1:60-1:65
Palestine . ... . . 0:90 6:30 3°50 1:80
IPersiayeeru ene nen, OO=O19 6:25 3°25-3'4 1:70-1°8
Mesopotamia . . . . . 0'90-1:0 6:40-6°7 3°65-3'9 1:85-2-0
PIA tae weir ee O90 6°30 3°90 2:0
Inns 6 90 0 3 0 « o OPO) 6°30-6°6 3°60-3°7 1:65-1°75
Mr. Severtzoff further informs me that in Turkestan he remarked the same individual variation in coloration
of plumage as was observed in Mongolia by Colonel Przevalsky, but to a lesser degree. I may here
remark that the description of Caccabis sinaica, the pale form of the present species, was not published
until after the death of Bonaparte. The name was published in 1856; but no description was then
given. However, a paper giving diagnoses of the various Red-legged Partridges was placed in the hands
of the editor of the ‘ Journ. fiir Orn.’ shortly before the death of Prince Bonaparte; but this was not
issued until 1858.
Tuts, the eastern representative of our European Greek Partridge, is met with in Europe only
in the south-eastern countries, but is thence very generally distributed in Asia, in suitable
localities, as far east as China. Although Caccadis saxatilis is the Red-legged Partridge of the
mainland of Greece, yet, so far as I can ascertain, the present species only is found on the
islands, where it is tolerably common, but does not extend further westward. Iam indebted to
Mr. C. G. Danford for a series of specimens from Rhodes, and to Lord Lilford for an opportunity
of examining the examples collected by him, all of which are certainly referable to the present
species. Several of those collected by Lord Lilford have the throat very white, nearly as white as
in Caccabis saxatilis, whereas others have the throat yellower and darker than average Indian
examples; but all have the characteristic distribution of the black at the base of the bill, and
cannot be separated from true C. chukar. Iam indebted to his Lordship for the following note,
viz. :—‘ The very few Partridges seen by me during our stay in Suda bay, in the island of Crete,
during the last days of March and the beginning of April 1874, belonged to the yellow-throated
race of this species, whilst all those met with in Cyprus, where they are extremely abundant,
were the white-throated; we found them principally in hilly and uncultivated ground amongst a
thick growth of juniper and lentiscus, but met with many also in the wheat-fields in the valleys
of the north-eastern promontory or Horn of Cyprus.” The present species is also numerous in
the Ionian islands, being, Lord Lilford states (Ibis, 1860, p. 238), “most abundant in Cephalonia,
Santa Maura, Kalamo, Petala, Arkudi, and Meganisi.” Dr. Kriiper met with it on the island of
Naxos, where, he says, it breeds in the more elevated portions of the mountains; and Messrs.
29
v
Elwes and Buckley say (Ibis, 1870, p. 328) that on the islands of Imbros and Lemnos, off the
entrance of the Dardanelles, it is so numerous that, as they were assured by a well-known
sportsman at Constantinople, fifty brace might with ease be bagged by a good shot at the end of
August. These gentlemen did not see or hear of it in Bulgaria; but Messrs. Alléon and Vian
state (Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1878, p. 261) that the species which occurs near Constantinople is
true C. chukar; and they describe a specimen, clearly giving the distinguishing characters. ‘They
add that it is resident near Constantinople. In Asia Minor it is said to be common in suitable
localities; and I have specimens obtained near Smyrna. Canon Tristram met with it in Palestine,
where it is, he says, the Partridge of the country. I have examined examples obtained by him
there which are undoubtedly true C. chukar, but are a trifle paler than specimens from the Greek
islands. Mr. Wyatt did not often met with it in the peninsula of Sinai, where, he says, it is
restricted in its habitat, keeping to the higher wadys; and he further writes (Ibis, 1870, p. 16)
as follows: —“It frequents the highest parts of the mountains in the neighbourhood of Jebel
Musa; it also occurs near Serbal, I believe, though I never met with it there myself. I found
it much more common on the highlands of Edom and at Petra than in the peninsula.” It is,
Mr. Blanford informs me, “ widely distributed in Persia, at all elevations up to 10,000 feet,
keeping to hills, especially those covered with small bushes, and often found in large coveys. I
have seen at least twenty together in August on the Elburz. The flesh is usually rather dry and
less well flavoured than that of other Partridges.” And in a note furnished to Mr. Blanford,
and lent to me by that gentleman, Major St. John writes as follows :—*I have shot this bird at
all elevations from 10,000 feet in the Elburz to the base of the hills near Bushire. In the wild
moorland country which fringes the oak-forests of Fars on the north, it is especially abundant.
I have killed twelve and a half brace before breakfast in September near the Khan-i-zinian
caravanserai, twenty-five miles west of Shiréz. Contrary to what is recorded of its habits in the
Himalayas, it avoids cultivation in Persia.”
It is stated by Mr. Hume to be common in Sindh. This gentleman writes (Stray Feathers,
i. p. 226) as follows:—‘‘The Sindh Chukore, though not specifically separable, is a great deal
paler than that found in Kumaon, the valleys of the Jumna, Ganges, Sutlej, and Beas, so far as
these lie within the hills, and the lower of the intermediate hill-ranges. As we travel further
west an intermediate type of colouring is noticeable; and, as a rule, the birds from the neigh-
bourhood of Murdan, though quite as dark on the upper surface and vent &c., are much paler,
in fact almost as pale as the Sindh birds, so far as the general tone of colour is concerned. The
Sindh birds closely resemble the race from Ladak, which I designated (Lahore to Yarkand)
pallescens; but that bird is characterized by its larger and stronger bill, and by the almost entire
absence of any rufous tinge on the crown, occiput, and nape; whereas in the Sindh birds the
bills run slightly smaller than those of the common Himalayan form, and there is a decided
rufous tinge on the occiput and nape. It is found throughout the rocky hills that divide the
Punjab from Afghanistan and Khelat and the latter from Sindh.” I reproduce these data
respecting the Sindh bird as given by Mr. Hume, but may add that I quite agree with him that
there is no specific distinction between these pale and dark races of the Chukor Partridge, as
every intermediate variety is to be found. In India, Dr. Jerdon writes (B. of India, ii. p. 569),
it is found throughout the western Himalayas, from the lowest range to the snows, and passing
hs)
100
4
over into Thibet; but it does not extend so far east as Sikkim. It is also met with in the Salt
range of the Punjab and its more alpine regions, passing into Afghanistan.” Captain Beavan
says (Ibis, 1868, p. 384) that it “is very generally found on the hills about Simla; and the first
time I saw wild specimens was in April 1866, when, marching up to that station from Umballah
by the new cart-road, I put a pair up off the road-side. I have since had numerous skins sent
to me from Kotgurh, a small village in the interior some fifty miles beyond Simla, where
numbers are annually snared by the natives, who sell their skins to the European inhabitants
of Simla. They seem to frequent tolerably open hill-sides, where cacti abound.” Colonel Irby
also speaks of the present species as being common in Kumaon, and especially numerous at a
place called Jullut or Moonsheyaree, seven days’ march from Almorah. It was found in
Yarkand by Dr. Henderson, who says (Lahore to Yarkand, p. 284) that “it swarms (wherever
the rivers debouch into the plains) over a belt of country some ten or fifteen miles in width.”
Mr. Severtzoff informs me that it is found throughout the entire Thian Shan, south-west
and north-east of the river Ili, but it is questionable if it occurs in the true Altai range, north
of Zaissan Lake. It inhabits the mountains near Samarcand, and in the small desert-ranges
north of Bokhara, westward to and including the Sheihdjeili range on the right bank of the
Oxus, some fifty miles N.E. of Khiva. Colonel Przevalsky met with it in the mountains of
Western China which skirt the desert of Gobi; and Mr. Swinhoe states (P. Z. S. 1871, p. 400)
that it inhabits “ North China, southwards to the north bank of the Upper Yangtsze, in the
gorges. Chinese specimens have a deep blush of rosiness over their upper plumage, which is
not seen in Himalayan skins.” I must not omit to name that a Red-legged Partridge, said to
be the present species, has been introduced into St. Helena. Mr. Melliss writes (Ibis, 1870,
p. 102) that its existence there was mentioned in Cavendish’s ‘Travels’ as early as the year
1588 ; and, he adds, there is no record to show whence it was introduced, but it is most probably
the present species, though a closer examination of specimens from St. Helena is desirable.
Like the Greek Partridge the present species frequents rugged, mountainous localities,
generally such as are sterile or covered with bushes where it can find shelter. Lord Lilford,
who met with it in the Ionian Islands, says (Ibis, 1860, p. 238) that it “haunts the stony hill-
sides, never, as far as my own observation goes, descending to the plain. It is not easy to make
a good bag of these birds, even in localities where they are numerous, as the coveys disperse on
being disturbed, and, on alighting, each bird takes a line of its own, and sets off running to the
nearest covert, which in these parts generally consists of thick evergreen scrub, from which it is
very difficult to flush them.” Asa rule the Chukor is averse to taking flight, and will neither
fly far nor often, trusting rather to its legs to carry it out of the way of danger. Dr. Henderson
relates (J. ¢.) that in Yarkand the natives know well how to take advantage of this. ‘The
Yarkandies,” he writes, ‘disdain the use of fire-arms for the chase of these birds. A party of
men mounted on ponies and armed with whips pursue a covey, and in a very short time succeed
in capturing the whole flock. The Chikone will never rise more than twice; and after that, as
they run, they are easily overtaken and knocked over with whips. This sport is carried on over
the most terribly rough ground in the rocky valleys; but the Yarkand ponies traverse at the top
of their speed country that most men would only crawl over with the utmost caution and
deliberation.”
5
Like the Greek Partridge it is extremely pugnacious and quarrelsome, especially in the
spring of the year; and it is said to have been kept tame for fighting in former ages, as game-
cocks were, not so long ago, in England. Naumann says that the inhabitants of Cyprus still
(when he wrote) kept them for this purpose; and he remarks that history relates that the
Roman Emperor Alexander Severus was extremely fond of this sport. The present species is
very easily tamed; and, according to Tournefort (Voy. au Levant, i. p. 386), the inhabitants of
Scio and other islands of the Greek archipelago keep tame Chukor Partridges, which they
allow to seek food in the fields like poultry. Baron Konig Warthausen gives (J. f. O. 1870,
p- 66) the following extract from the journal of Samuel Kiechel, who travelled through almost
the whole of Europe between 1585 and 1589:—“ In this island (Rhodes) many Partridges are
kept, some peasants having as many as 400 or 500, more or less. They breed, and are as tame
as geese. In the morning a boy or girl drives them out into the fields; and they fly away and
search for food during the day. Towards evening the child goes out in search of them; and
when they hear the child’s call they fly towards him or her, and are led back to the house of
their owner.” The Chukor Partridge breeds like the Greek Partridge, their nests and eggs
being very similar. Lord Lilford, who found it breeding in Cyprus, writes to me as follows :—
“We found several nests, containing from thirteen to sixteen eggs each, and consisting of dry
grasses with a few withered leaves, and in one instance a good many feathers; these nests were
placed in the centre of low, very thick-growing lentisk bushes, in one case close to a much
frequented mule-track. The eggs are remarkably small for the size of the bird; but these eastern
birds are themselves smaller than those of South Italy and Sicily. In certain portions of Cyprus
very fine mixed bags might be made in the autumn of these Partridges, Francolins, Quails,
Woodcocks, and hares; but, though the ground is not difficult to travel, the density of the ever-
green scrub renders good dogs and plenty of them absolutely necessary.”
A series of eggs of the Chukor Partridge in my collection from Palestine differ from those
of the common Redleg in having the ground-colour paler, and the markings, as a rule, less clearly
defined ; but they vary much, inter se, some being pale whitish buff with the smallest possible
reddish dots, whereas others are tolerably closely marked with dull rufous blotches. In size
they vary from 14 by 14% inch to 133 by 1, inch. I have not deemed it necessary to give a
Plate of the present species, as the chief characteristic, viz. the distribution of the black at the
base of the bill, is not so easily shown on a Plate; but the woodcuts of the heads of the two
species at the end of the present article will clearly show this character, that on the right being
Caccabis saxatilis, and that on the left Caccabis chukar.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. HE. Dresser.
a,d, 6,2. Phandos, Rhodes, December 11th, 1874 (C. G. Danford). c,3,d,2. Near Smyrna, January
10th, 1866 (G. v. Gonzenbach).
E Mus. Lord Lilford.
a,b, 3, ¢,?. Cyprus, April 29th, 1875. d. Capo di Gata, Cyprus, May 8th, 1875 (L.), e, 2. Smyma
lol
6
(Verreaux). f, 3. Nazareth, March 9th, 1864 (H. B. Tristram).
1864 (H. B. T.). h, i,j, k, l. India.
E Mus. Brit. Reg.
g, 2%. Ghor of Jordan, March 11th,
a, 6. El Bussah. c,d, e. Altai Mountains? (Brandt). f, g. Persia, labelled C. pallidiceps (Loftus). h.
Kerrind, Persia, June 14th, 1851. 7 Mungerrah, Persia. £,/. Himalayas.
gq. Thibet (Earl Gifford).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a, 6. India.
m,n,0, p. Nepal (Hodgson).
Caccabis chukar.
Caccabis saxatilis.
471
|. RED-LEGGED PARTRIDGE.
CACCABIS RUBRA
2. BARBARY PARTRIDGE.
CACCABIS PETROSA
277
CACCABIS RUFA.
(RED-LEGGED PARTRIDGE.)
Perdix rubra, Brisson, Orn. i. p. 236 (1760).
Tetrao rufus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 277 (1766, partim).
La Perdrix rouge d Europe, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. ii. p. 431, pl. xv. (1771).
Tetrao rufus, L., Gm. Syst. Nat. i. p. 756 (1788).
Perdix rufa (L.) 8, Latham, Ind. Orn. ii. p. 647 (1790).
Perdiz rubra varia, J. ¥. Naumann, Naturg. Vog. Deutschl. vi. p. 566 (1833).
Perdix rubra pallida, J. ¥. Naumann, tom. cit. p. 567 (1833).
Perdiz rubra candida, J. F. Naumann, tom. cit. p. 567 (1833).
Caccabis rufa (L.), G. R. Gray, Gen. of Birds, iii. p. 508 (1849).
Perdiz rufidorsalis, C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 266 (1855).
Perdix rubra intercedens, A. K. Brehm, Allg. deutsch. naturh. Zeit. 1857, p. 472.
Caccabis rubra communis, A. K. Brehm, Verz. Samml. C. L. Brehm, p. 11 (1866).
Red-legged Partridge, French Partridge, English; Perdrix rouge, French; Perdiz, Spanish ;
Pernice comune, IUtalian.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 150; Werner, Atlas, Gallinacés, pl. 13; Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 29.
fig. 9; Naumann, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 165. figs. 1, 2; Gould, B. of Eur. pl. 260; id. B. of
G. Brit. iv. pl. xiv.; Roux, Orn. Prov. pls. 257, 258.
d ad. fronte et pileo cinereis, héc in parte centrali rufescente lavato, pileo imo, nucha et collo postico rufes-
centi-brunneis: corpore supra rufescenti-fusco, dorso imo, scapularibus et tectricibus alarum cinereo
tinctis : remigibus nigro-fuscis, primariis omnibus (extimo excepto) et secundariis externis in pogonio
externo ex parte ochraceis: rectricibus centralibus dorso concoloribus, reliquis saturaté ferrugineis :
gula cum capitis lateribus albis et lined superciliari albi ad nucham ducta: ad basin mandibule
utrinque et in mento centraliter macula nigra: a rostro per oculum circum gutturem fascia nigra
producté: gutture infra hanc fasciam grisescenti-albido, ubique nigro guttato et vix brunneo lavato, in
parte ima grisescenti-brunneo: abdomine et subcaudalibus pallidé rufescentibus: hypochondriis varie-
gatis, plumis ad basin pallidé rufescentibus, posthac czrulescenti-cinereis fascia alb& et fasciA sub-
apicali nigra notatis et ferrugineo terminatis: rostro et pedibus rubris, iride rufescenti-fusca.
2 ad. mari similis, sed sordidior et vix minor.
Juv. sordidior, corpore supra brunnescentiore: secundariis intimis vix brunneo variegatis et tectricibus alarum
ochrascente albido notatis: fascia collari nulla: gutture imo nigro guttato.
Adult Male (Norfolk). Forehead to the centre of the crown ash-grey, gradually merging into reddish
brown, which colour extends over the hinder portion of the crown, nape, and hind neck ; upper parts
4k
2
generally reddish brown, tinged with grey, this latter colour being most marked on the wing-coverts,
scapulars, and lower back; quills blackish brown, a portion of the outer web of all the primaries,
except the first, and of the seven outer secondaries ochre-yellow, the four central rectrices coloured
like the back, the remainder being deep foxy red; throat and cheeks white, and a line of white passes
from the base of the upper mandible over the eye down to the side of the hind neck; on each side of
the lower mandible at the base, and at the base of the mandible on the chin, is a black spot; from the
bill through the eye a black band passes, widening and meeting the corresponding band on the fore
neck, enclosing the white on the throat; below this band the lower neck is greyish white, spotted and
splashed all round the neck with black, and slightly tinged with brown, and on the lower part of the
throat merging into greyish brown; breast dark French grey, lower breast, abdomen, under tail-coverts,
and tibial feathers light reddish ; flanks with the feathers very richly variegated, being light reddish at
the base, then rich blue-grey, then crossed by a white bar, then by a subterminal, clearly defined, black
bar, and finally terminated with bright foxy red; bill, naked space about the eye, and feet bright red ;
iris hazel, with a reddish tinge. Total length about 13 inches, culmen 0°75, wing 6:0, tail 3°65,
tarsus 1:7.
Adult Female. Very closely resembles the male, but is a trifle duller in colour, and wants the knob on the
tarsus,
Young (Leadenhall Market, September). Resembles the adult, but is much duller in colour; some of the
inner secondaries and wing-coverts variegated with brown, and marked with yellowish white; throat
dirty white, the black collar wanting, the lower throat being merely closely. spotted with black.
Obs. Specimens from Spain are a trifle richer in general coloration than others from England ; and the two
I have examined in Messrs. Salvin and Godman’s collection, from the Azores, have the black collar
much broader than many others I have seen.
THE common Red-legged or French Partridge, as this species is usually called in England, has
a comparatively small range, being met with only in Western and Southern Europe, Madeira,
and the Azores; but having been introduced into Great Britain it has now become tolerably
common here, and has been found even as far north as Scotland.
Mr. A. G. More, writing on its range in England, says (Ibis, 1865, p. 428), “ Introduced
about one hundred years ago, the Red-legged Partridge has become very numerous in some of
the eastern counties, where, in the struggle for life, it has been stated to have in some places
nearly supplanted the common Grey Partridge. There must be some local influences that limit
the range of the Red-legged Partridge in this country, since the attempts made to establish it in
Dorset, Hereford, Derby, and East Yorkshire appear to have failed; nor has the bird hitherto
spread to any of our south-western shires. I am informed by Mr. 'T. Gough that it has bred
regularly of late years in Westmoreland. The bird is returned as now breeding occasionally in
Kent (Mr. G. Jeil), in Essex, Herts, Oxford (occasionally), Bucks, Suffolk, Norfolk, Cambridge,
Huntingdon (occasionally), Northampton (occasionally), Lincoln, Rutland (occasionally), and
West York (very rarely). The Rev. F. J. Scott believes that it is established in the hills of
Gloucestershire; but some confirmation of this last locality appears desirable.” As stated by
Mr. More, the eastern counties of England are those where this species appears to have found a
home most suited to it; and in Norfolk and Suffolk it is numerous. Mr. H. Stevenson, in his
3
exhaustive article on this species (B. of Norfolk, i. p. 405), writes as follows :—‘ Its introduction
into the eastern counties dates only from the close of the last century, when, about the year
1770, the Marquis of Hertford and Lord Rendlesham are recorded to have had large quantities
of eggs imported from the continent, and the young birds, hatched under domestic fowls, were
turned off at Sudbourn and Rendlesham, in Suffolk, on the respective estates of the above noble-
men. From thence they soon spread to other portions of the county, and the adjoining parts of
Norfolk; and in Daniel’s ‘Rural Sports’ we find the author speaking of a covey of fourteen
discovered by himself in 1777 within two miles of Colchester, which in a very thick piece of
turnips, ‘ baffled for half an hour the exertions of a brace of good pointers to make them take
wing; and the first which did so immediately perched on the hedge, and was shot in that situation
without it being known what bird it was.’ Others are also described by the same writer as
having been killed in 1799, at Sudbourn, where they were originally turned off. During the
next twenty years, they would seem to have increased rapidly, as in 1826 they are thus referred
to by Messrs. Sheppard and Whitear:—‘ These birds are now very plentiful in some parts of
Suffolk. We have seen at least one hundred and fifty brace in a morning upon Dunningworth
heath ; and they are found in greater or less numbers from Aldborough to Woodbridge; a few
are also sometimes seen in Norfolk.’ It appears, however, that other game-preservers, in both
Norfolk and Suffolk, following the example of the Marquis of Hertford, procured eggs from the
Continent, and were equally successful in extending the breed. Mr. Alfred Newton has furnished
me with the following additional particulars, as communicated to him by his late father :—‘ The
year after Lord Cornwallis died (1823) Lords Alvanley and De Ros hired Culford; they had a
large number of Red-legged Partridges’ eggs sent over from France, which they distributed about
the neighbourhood, keeping, however, some at Culford. The Duke of Norfolk had a good many
at Fornham; so also had Mr. Waddington at Cavenham. The eggs were set under hens; and
nearly all of them hatched. ‘This was the first introduction of the Red-legged Partridge into °
West Suffolk. They had been plentiful in the eastern division of the county several years before,
where Lord Hertford had introduced them.’ Mr. Newton refused to have any eggs; but in a few
years the birds spread to Elveden, and thence, of course, very rapidly into the adjacent parts of
Norfolk.”
It does not inhabit Scotland; and an attempt referred to by Messrs. Baikie and Heddle
(Nat. Hist. of Ork. p. 56) to introduce it into Orkney appears to have failed, as nothing further
has been heard of it there. Mr. Robert Gray (B. of W. of Scotl. p. 243) states that Mr. James
Mearns shot a specimen within two miles of Aberdeen, in January 1867, which appears only to
have been a chance visitor from the south. According to Thompson (B. of Ivel. ii. p. 65), it was
“introduced into the county of Galway, in Ireland, about thirty years ago, but does not seem to
have thriven there.” He refers to two specimens having been sent from Galway to Dublin to be
stuffed previous to 1844; and one was, he says, shot near Clonmel on the 4th February, 1849.
It does not occur in Scandinavia, Russia, or Finland; and its occurrence in Germany is very
doubtful. Naumann states that it is not found there; and Dr. Altum writes (J. f O. 1863,
p. 114) that its occurrence in Munsterland is based on a picture; but Mr. F. Tiemann states
(J. f. O. 1865, p. 218) that it has occurred in Silesia.
I do not find any record of its occurrence in Holland; and in Belgium it is of very acci-
4k2
105
4
dental occurrence, and attempts to naturalize it in the vicinity of Liége have resulted in failure.
Throughout the whole of France it is generally distributed, being, however, local and somewhat
rare in the northern districts, but extremely numerous in the south. The Rey. A. C. Smith (Ibis,
1868, p. 450) says this is the only recognized Partridge of Portugal, and is very abundant; and
that Dr. Tristram writes of it:—‘‘Your specimen is much brighter than our English Red-leg; the
chestnut on the head and upper back is much brighter, and the ash-brown of the lower back
much more distinct and contrasted with the rufous above; the ochreous abdomen and lower tail-
coverts are much paler.” But Dr. E. Rey, writing in 1872, says (J. f. O. 1872, p. 154) that it is
now nowhere common in that country, chiefly owing to the law which permits free shooting,
though wild cats may to some extent have assisted in diminishing its numbers. In Spain it is
extremely common, and, as Lord Lilford states (Ibis, 1875, p. 8), “is the Partridge of Spain,
from Irun to Tarifa, and from Lisbon to Barcelona;” but it does not occur on the Rock of
Gibraltar, where Caccabis petrosa is alone found. Mr. Howard Saunders speaks also of it as
being “‘ common everywhere” in Spain. In the Balearic Islands the present species is the only
species of the family which occurs; and Lord Lilford says this is the case also in Corsica and Elba.
In Switzerland it is said (J. f. O. 1860, p. 393) to be rare, and unknown in the neighbourhoed of
Boll; but it occurs in limited numbers in the Jura and in some parts of Canton Wallis. Bailly
says that in Savoy it is more numerous than Caccabis saxatilis, but less so than the common
Grey Partridge; and on the mainland of Italy it is generally distributed and numerous; but
Lord Lilford says it becomes decidedly scarce in the southern provinces, and he never met with
a specimen in the markets of Naples. In Sardinia and Sicily it does not occur; and Mr. C. A.
Wright includes it (Ibis, 1869, p. 252) amongst doubtful occurrences in his third appendix to
his “ List of Birds observed in Malta and Gozo.” I do not find any record of its occurrence
further eastward, except that Dr. A. Fritsch, writing on the ornithology of Bohemia, says (J. f. O.
1871, p. 313) that attempts were made to introduce it in the Trauenberg district in 1863; and
about ten years previously Count Furstenberg made a similar trial in the Piirglitzer forest, which
did not succeed, as the birds could not stand the severe winters. It is stated by Dr. L. Buvry
(J. f. O. 1857, p. 67) to occur in North-west Africa; but neither Loche nor any other of the
later writers on North-west African ornithology includes it, and Loche states positively that only
Caccabis petrosa is found in Algeria.
It occurs at Madeira and in the Azores, in the latter, according to Mr. Godman, inhabiting
the eastern and central groups—and is said to be very abundant in the mountains of St. Mary’s,
and occasionally found at St. Michael’s and Terceira.
From personal experience I know scarcely any thing respecting the habits of this Partridge,
and cannot do better than transcribe Mr. Stevenson’s notes on it as observed by him in Norfolk.
This gentleman writes (B. of Norfolk, i. p. 408) as follows:—‘“ The shy, restless nature of this
species, continually ‘ footing it’ before the guns, and taking wing only when closely pressed or
far out of reach of any ordinary fowling-piece, renders it particularly obnoxious to sportsmen on
the more closely cultivated and enclosed portions of the country. In such districts many are
the volleys of something more than small shot called forth by the provoking habits of these
birds in the early part of the season. No sooner do the guns enter the turnips at one end of
the field, than the wary Frenchmen are seen topping the opposite fences one after another,
5
alighting again on the adjoining stubbles, and, with heads erect, making off at a most incredible
pace. Scattering themselves in all directions, they unsettle the English birds that would
otherwise lie well in good cover—and of course, from their running before the dogs, were
still more objectionable under the old style of Partridge-shooting with pointers or setters.
Thus trying his patience in every possible way, it is no great wonder if the sportsman, under
such circumstances, delights to bag every Red-leg he can, and considers no distance too far to
‘let fly’ at his feathered tormentors. Nor is he repaid after all his trouble and many disappoint-
ments by securing a delicacy for the table, the chief attraction of this species consisting far more
in its handsome plumage than its edible qualities.
“Undoubtedly a fine old male, with its vermilion-coloured beak and legs, its dark gorget,
and lovely feathers on the flanks and thighs, is a very striking object, and contrasts well with
the more sombre and uniform tints of the common Partridge, when the day’s ‘bag’ is laid out
for inspection. Unsuited, however, as is the usual style of shooting to the habits of French
Partridges, they afford fine sport in November and December, when most of the beet and
turnips are off the lands, as they then congregate on the ploughed fields, and can be driven over
the gunners placed under cover at convenient distances. In fact the ‘driving’ system now so
generally adopted on the large estates, is unquestionably the proper method of shooting Red-legs,
and one which tries well the mettle of the sportsmen, as they mount up higher than the English
birds, and fly, when well on the wing, at an almost incredible pace. Yet, at the same time, it
must be remembered that such sport can be enjoyed with impunity only on extensive manors,
well stocked with birds, since, if attempted too often on limited areas, the Partridges may be
thus driven off the land altogether, as surely as by the too frequent use of the ‘kite’ at the
latter part of the season. A very effectual time also for reducing their numbers is immediately
after a good fall of snow, before a night’s frost has hardened the surface. No longer able to
run, and still unwilling to fly till obliged to take wing, they seem deprived for the time of
their usual sagacity, and, seeking shelter in the thickest hedge-rows, if in the enclosed parts of
the country, or in the gorse and broom coverts of the light-land districts, afford excellent sport
for a couple of guns ‘doubling’ the fences, with a steady dog to flush the birds. Advantage is
likewise taken by some persons of the altered character of the Red-legs when the snow is on the
ground; for by flushing them again and again, and following them up directly, the birds become
sufficiently exhausted to be run down one after the other—a method not unfrequently adopted
by poachers in districts not strictly preserved. Under similar circumstances our English birds,
if they seek cover at all, betake themselves to the thickest plantation, frequenting the hedge-
rows even less than at other times; but they prefer, for the most part, the open fields, where
their dark forms are plainly visible on the white ground, and where they are more difficult than
ever to approach within shot. There is no reason, however, to suppose from this habit that the
Red-leg is more susceptible of cold than the Grey Partridge, as, with the same opportunities of
procuring food, I have never found their condition affected by the sharpest weather ; indeed
they come to us from a country where the winters are uniformly more severe than our own.
“They frequent both heavy and light lands; and I have frequently found them plentiful on
heayy-land farms where the English birds have been comparatively scarce, thus filling a void;
for as French birds thrive well where, before their introduction, the Grey Partridge was not
107
108
6
found, it is unfair to suppose that the absence of the latter is now owing to the pugnacity of the
Red-legs. In such localities, by pursuing them in wet weather, when the sticky soil prevented
their running, I have been pretty successful in making a bag; and they may be readily killed
during a drenching shower if the gun-caps or cartridges will but go off when required. Strong
on the wing, and not often affording a close shot, they require very hard hitting, and will
frequently carry off the best part of a charge, to die of their wounds after a prolonged flight;
whilst many a bird, when finally brought to bag, shows evidence of former injuries from long
shots, so frequently, though somewhat cruelly, made at them at almost impossible distances.
There is one other particular in which the French Partridge differs entirely from our common
species—namely, in its habit of occasionally perching in trees, flying up into the thick foliage
like a Pheasant or Wood-Pigeon—an action which at first not a little astonished our local
sportsmen, many of whom most probably entertained the same opinion as an old veteran
Partridge-shot, who assured me that the first time he met with a covey of Red-legs, and some
of them took to the trees, ‘he fully believed the birds had gone mad.’ On one occasion, whilst
shooting on a farm where they were very numerous, I observed this course adopted by single
birds in three instances on the same day; and more recently I have known a good-sized covey
flushed from the top of an oak timber; and single birds, when chased from place to place in
snowy weather, fly up to and settle in the tops of oak pollards. They may also be seen sitting
occasionally in a long row on the top of a wall, the ridge of a barn-roof, or on an ordinary park
fencing. It is not an unusual custom in this country, when nests of the Grey Partridge have been
mown out, or discovered in too exposed situations, to transfer the eggs thus taken to a French
Partridge’s nest; and in several instances I have known them successfully hatched, and the
young birds treated in every respect as her own by the foster-mother. It is said, however, that
the running habits of the French birds are generally fatal to the English nestlings, which, to use
a thoroughly Norfolk expression, are ‘drabbled’ to death in attempting to keep up with such
untiring pedestrians. I mention this only as a common belief amongst gamekeepers, being
unable to vouch for its accuracy; but I have more than once observed, in the shooting-season, a
pair of old French birds rise from the turnips at the head of a covey of English, though, of
course, it is quite possible in such cases that the Red-legs had ‘run up’ the Grey Partridges, and
thus all had risen together.
“French Partridges, both on the wing and in the field, are easily recognized at a distance
by their larger size and darker tints of plumage, to say nothing of the difference in the noise of
their wings in flying. When alarmed they carry their heads erect, turning them in all directions
to catch the sound of any approaching danger, and continue this even when running at their
greatest speed. If undisturbed, however, and feeding leisurely, their appearance (as seen through
a glass) is very different, and, with feathers puffed out and rounded backs, whilst slowly searching
the ground for grain and insects, they look almost as large as Pheasants. They are partial to
the shelter of thick hedge-rows and plantations, but, unless driven into such cover, are seldom
found far from the outer fence, through which they can run on the slightest alarm; and in
walking quietly up a wood-side where these birds are plentiful, it is very usual to see one or
more Red-legs issuing from the hedge-bottom, and hurrying along under the bank. They are
vol
fond also of basking in thick rushy carrs; and in low meadows will hide in the sedgy margins of
the watercourses, where I have shot them late in the season when looking for Snipe.”
It has been supposed by some observers that a partial migration of this species takes place
on our east coast; but after going very fully into this question, Mr. Stevenson shows that the
balance of evidence is against this being the case; and I fully agree with him in the conclusions
at which he has arrived.
Eggs of this Partridge in my collection from Norfolk are yellowish buff or stone-buff,
sprinkled with dull reddish markings, which in some consist only of fine dots spread over the
surface of the shell, whereas in others there are irregular blotches here and there. One speci-
men is blotched with pale purplish pink on a pale stone-buff ground. In size my specimens
vary trom 12% by 145 to 126 by 123.
The specimen figured, on the same Plate with Caccabis petrosa, is an adult male from
Norfolk, and is the bird described, this and the female being in my collection; but the young
male described is in the collection of Mr. J. H. Gurney, jun.
In the preparation of the above article 1 have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,3. Norfolk. 6,2. Near Hampstead, July 1871 (Davy).
E Mus. Salvin and Godman.
a, 6. St. Mary’s, Azores, June 1865 (fF. D. Godman).
E Mus. J. H. Gurney, jun.
a, 2. Northrepps, Norwich, December 30th, 1865 (J. H. G.). 6, juv. Leadenhall Market, September 1870.
c. Madrid, 1867.
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a, 3. Valencia, January 13th. 4,5. Malaga, December 24th.
E Mus. Lord Lilford.
a,b, 3,c, 9. Madrid market, April 1865 (L.).
L109
CACCABIS PETROSA.
(BARBARY PARTRIDGE.)
Red-legged Partridge from Barbary, Edwards, Nat. Hist. p. 70, pl. 70 (1747).
Perdiz rubra barbarica, Briss. Orn. i. p. 239 (1760).
Tetrao rufus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 277 (1766, partim).
La Perdriz rouge de Barbarie, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. ii. p. 445 (1771).
La Perdriz de Roche, Buff. tom. cit. p. 446 (1771).
Tetrao petrosus, Gmelin, Syst. Nat. i. p. 758 (1788).
Perdix rufa y, Lath. Ind. Orn. ii. p. 647 (1790).
Perdiz petrosa (Gm.), Lath. tom. cit. p. 648 (1790).
Alectoris, Kaup (Perdix petrosa, Lath.), Natiirl. Syst. p. 180 (1829).
Caccabis petrosa (Gm.), G. R. Gray, Gen. of Birds, iii. p. 508 (1849).
Pernice di Sardegna, Italian; El Hedjel, Moorish.
Figure notabiles.
Edwards, /. c.; Werner, Atlas, Gallinacés, pl. 14; Fritsch, Vog. Kur. taf. 29. fig. 6; Gould,
B. of Eur. pl. 261. fig. 1; Roux, Orn. Proy. pl. 260.
¢ ad. pileo centrali a basi rostri, nucha et collo postico castaneis, capitis et pilei lateribus cum gula pallideé
cerulescenti-cinereis: torque collari castaneo, lateraliter latiore, et albo guttato: dorso et corpore
supra grisescenti-brunneis : remigibus nigricanti-fuscis, primariis (extimo excepto) dimidio apicali in
pogonio externo ochrascentibus, secundariis pallidioribus indistincté nigro-fusco vermiculatis: scapu-
laribus saturaté cinereis valdé castaneo marginatis: rectricibus centralibus dorso concoloribus et vix
nigro-fusco vermiculatis, reliquis saturaté castaneis: gutture imo cinereo, pectore pallidé rufescente :
abdomine rufescenti-cervino, hypochondriis ut in Caccabe rufa picturatis: rostro et pedibus rubris:
iride fusca.
2 ad. mari similis, sed vix minor et sordidior.
Adult Male (Sardinia, January). Centre of the crown from the base of the bill, nape, and hind neck rich
chestnut-red ; sides of the head, above and below the eye, and throat light bluish ash or French grey ;
below this is a collar of rich chestnut-red, very broad on the sides of the neck and narrow in the centre,
being marked with small white round spots; back and rump greyish brown; quills blackish brown, all
the primaries, except the first, with the terminal half of the outer web deep ochre-yellow, secondaries
lighter brown, very indistinctly vermiculated on the outer web with dark brown, outer scapulars and
some of the adjoiming wing-coverts deep bluish ash, broadly margined with chestnut-red, remaming
wing-coverts like the back; the four central rectrices coloured like the back, and shghtly vermiculated
with dark blackish brown, the remaining rectrices dark foxy red; throat, below the red collar, bluish
ash ; breast light reddish, this colour becoming rufous buff on the abdomen and under tail-coverts ;
flanks marked with white, black, and foxy red, or chestnut, as in Caccabis rufa; beak, the bare space
Via
==l
OS)
2
round the eye and legs red; iris hazel. Total length about 13 inches, culmen 0°9, wing 6:1, tail 3°75.
tarsus 1:85.
Adult Female. Resembles the male, but is a trifle less brightly coloured, and, as a rule, a little smaller
in size.
Tuis Partridge is found only in Southern Europe, and North-western Africa and the Canaries,
and does not appear to have been acclimatized in other parts of Europe. Yarrell certainly
includes it in his work on the birds of Great Britain, but on very slight grounds, one specimen
having been said to have been picked up dead at Edmondthorpe, about six miles from Melton
Mowbray, in April 1842; and makes the improbable surmise that eggs of this Partridge may
have been introduced with those of the common Red-legged Partridge. It does not appear to
inhabit France, as, although Degland and Gerbe speak of it as occurring in the southern portion
of that country, Jaubert and Barthélemy-Lapommeraye do not even include it as a straggler; nor
has it been met with in Portugal.
In Spain it is found only on the Rock of Gibraltar, where it is resident, having probably
been introduced there. Mr. Saunders also says (Ibis, 1871, p. 223) that he saw a specimen in
the Murcia Museum, and Dr. Angel Guirao informed him that, though now almost extinct, it was
formerly not uncommon in that province. It would appear that it is only found in a wild state
in the island of Sardinia, and perhaps in Corsica; and any occasional specimens killed in Tuscany
or Liguria should be attributed, in Salvadori’s opinion, to escaped or turned-down birds brought
by the trading vessels. It does not occur in Sicily, in spite of Malherbe’s statement to the
contrary. Writing on the ornithology of Sardinia, Mr. A. B. Brooke says (Ibis, 1873, p. 334), it
“Cis the only Partridge in the south of the island, where it is still common in many parts, and is
found both on the low mountains and plains. The cry of the cock bird during the months of
April and May is very remarkable, loud and melancholy, and can be heard always in the early
mornings and late evenings. I have heard several rumours of a different Partridge existing in
the north of the island, and I was assured by a good sportsman that he had shot P. cinerea
there; but I never saw a specimen.”
It is recorded from Greece by both Von der Mihle and Lindermayer. The former says
that it inhabits the elevated portions of the Taygetus mountains, in the Southern Morea. It
does not seem to occur in Rumelia; and Lindermayer states that it is not met with in the
southern islands of the Archipelago, nor does Erhardt include it; but Lindermayer surmises
that it may be met with in Crete or Cyprus. It does not appear to occur in Asia Minor or
North-east Africa, but is common and sedentary in North-western Africa, and, according to
Loche, is the only species found there. Mr. W. T. Chambers-Hodgetts shot several specimens
in Tripoli, where, he writes (Ibis, 1867, p. 101), it abounded amongst the steep rocky hills
covered with low scrub. Mr. J. H. Gurney, jun., says that a friend of his and two companions
killed upwards of seventy brace in one day at Oran, but he adds that it is almost unknown in
the Sahara. Canon Tristram, however, writes (Ibis, 1860, p. 72) that he put up a covey in the
Wed Nea, south of the Mzab country, where water is found only for three months in the year,
and the whole vegetation is entirely confined to the narrow gorge of the Wed. Mr. O. Salvin
3
speaks of it (Ibis, 1859, p. 353) as being especially numerous in the Regency of Tunis; and
Mr. C. F. Tyrwhitt-Drake found it everywhere numerous in Tangier and Eastern Morocco.
The various authors on the ornithology of the Canaries record it thence; and Dr. Carl
Bolle says (J. f. O. 1855, p. 173) that it is the commonest game bird in the Canaries, and 1s
wanting only on Fuerteventura and Lanzarote, as well as Palma, though in the latter place it
would be supposed that it should occur, as every requisite for its existence is found there; and
he further writes (J. f. O. 1857, p. 333) that it is common in the Pinal of Teneriffe, even on the
cumbre and in the elevated dry cafiadas, and breeds amongst the bushes at the foot of the
Teyde. Mr. Godman names that he frequently saw them exposed for sale in the market-place
at Santa Cruz.
In its habits this bird assimilates to the Red-legged Partridge; but Loche says that it
prefers uncultivated soil to localities which have been under cultivation, and the seeds of wild
plants to cereals. It feeds on seeds, insects, and caterpillars, and obtains its food generally by
scratching for it in the soil. It also feeds on tender shoots. It rarely wanders far from the
locality where it was hatched, and where found is a resident. ‘Though usually peaceable and
somewhat shy, the males become quarrelsome during the breeding-season, and the call-note of
the female makes them forget their usual caution; hence at that season of the year they are
frequently entrapped by means of a whistle with which the note of the female is imitated.
Its flight is heavy and whirring, like that of the other Partridges. It walks with celerity
and ease, this being its usual mode of locomotion. Like its ally (Caccabis rufa) it frequently
perches on trees or bushes, especially when suddenly disturbed. It is easily tamed, and becomes
exceedingly familiar. Loche says that it soon fraternizes with domestic poultry, and when made
a pet of will live on good terms even with the dogs and cats about the house.
It nests, like its allies, on the ground, its nest being merely a hole scratched in the soil under
shelter of abush. Loche says that incubation lasts nineteen or twenty days, and that the female
alone undertakes the cares of incubation. The young run directly they are hatched, and are
very carefully tended and guarded by the female, who will expose herself to any danger to
preserve her progeny.
The eggs of this species closely resemble those of the common Redleg (C. rufa) both in size
and coloration; but, judging from six specimens in my collection from Algeria, they are a trifle
more richly marked with rufous than the general run of eggs of C. rufa. Mr. Salvin says that
it deposits its eggs early in April, and that from eleven to fifteen is the usual complement.
The flesh of this Partridge is said to be much less palatable than that of the common
Redleg and the Greek Partridge; but I have not personally been able to judge of this.
The specimen described, and figured on the same Plate with the Red-legged Partridge, is an
adult male from Sardinia, sent to me by Count Salvadori.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,3, 6,9. Sardinia, January 1869 (Salvadori). c,d. Algeria, autumn, 1862 (C. A. Wright). d,?. Barbary,
February 1863 (C. A. Wright). e,g. Teneriffe, April 21st, 1871 (Ff. D. Godman).
Er3
4
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a,3,6,2. Tangier. c,?. Melilla, Morocco, October 8th, 1872.
E Mus. Salvin and Godman.
o,3. Teneriffe, April 18th, 1871. 6,2. Teneriffe, April 21st, 1871 (F. D. Godman).
E Mus. Lord Lalford.
a,3. Gibraltar, September 1870 (H. L. Irby). 6,6. Algeria, autumn of 1862 (C. 4. Wright).
Genus AMMOPERDIX.
Caccabis apud G. R. Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1843, p. 372.
Perdiz apud Fraser, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1843, p. 70.
Ammoperdiz, Gould, Birds of Asia, pt. 3 (1851).
THIS genus contains only two species, Ammoperdix bonhami and Ammoperdix heyi, which are
found in the north-eastern part of the Ethiopian Region and in the western portions of the
Oriental and Eastern Palearctic Regions, the former species occurring also in the extreme south-
eastern portion of the Western Palearctic Region. They frequent the low hills and stony
ravines where there is but scanty vegetation, and where the colour of the sand and stones is
closely similar to that of their plumage. They are found in coveys, and are said to resemble
the Quail in their flight and the mode in which they rise when flushed; and as they rise they
usually utter a whistle. Their ordinary note is said to be a double whistle uttered several times
in succession ; and some authors say that it reminded them of the call of some of the Red-legged
Partridges. They make a very slight nest, it being merely a depression in the ground amongst
the stones, lined with a few grass-bents and feathers; and their eggs, which are numerous, are
uniform stone-isabelline, unmarked.
Ammoperdiz bonhami, the type of the genus, has the bill moderately short, stout, about as
broad as high (or slightly broader than high) at the base, decurved from the nostrils to the point,
which is rounded and thin-edged; nostrils basal, lateral, covered above with an exposed horny
oblong operculum ; no bare space behind the eye; wings rather short, broad, the first and second
quills nearly equal and shorter than the fifth, the third and fourth longest; tail short, even,
nearly concealed by the coverts; legs moderate, the tarsus anteriorly scutellate, and without any
trace of spur behind; toes moderate, the hind toe small; claws compressed, curved, moderately
obtuse.
164,
115
472
VET PHM
IWVHNO@ XIG¥adOWWY
J9dIuluvd JAasgas
ed 98enN FT
117
AMMOPERDIX BONHAML
(SEESHE PARTRIDGE.)
Caccabis bonhami, G. R. Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1843, p. 372.
Perdix bonhani, Fraser, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1843, p. 70.
Perdix griseogularis, Brandt, Bull. Acad. St. Pétersb. 1845, p. 278.
Ammoperdix bonhami (Gray), Bp. Compt. Rend. xlii. p. 882 (1856).
Figure notabiles.
Gould, B. of Asia, ii. pl. 4; Des Murs, Icon. Orn. pl. 29.
3 ad. pileo cinereo-cano, versus nucham vinaceo tincto, fronte et striad superciliari nigris: loris et plumis
auricularibus albis: corpore supra pallidé cinereo-isabellino, saturaté griseo et pallidé fusco trans-
fasciato et punctato: remigibus primariis fuscis, omnibus preter primum extus pallidé cervino fasciatis :
secundariis et scapularibus isabellino-fusco et rufescente isabellino fasciatis et vermiculatis: cauda
castaned, versus apicem griseo tincta, rectricibus centralibus dorso concoloribus: mento, capitis late-
ribus et gula cinereo-canis: colli lateribus saturaté cinereis albo guttatis: pectore vinaceo: hypochon-
driis vinaceo-cinereis, plumis nigro et rufescenti marginatis: abdomine griseo-albo pallidé rufescenti
tincto: subcaudalibus pallidé rufescentibus: rostro aurantiaco: pedibus saturaté flavis vix viridi
tinctis.
2 ad. corpore supra sicut in mare colorato, sed magis brunneo: pileo et nucha dorso concoloribus: capitis
lateribus et gula cervino-albidis, nigricante griseo fasciatis: mento fere albido: pectore et hypo-
chondriis rufescenti-cervinis, angusté griseo fasciatis: abdomine et subcaudalibus cervino-albidis :
rostro aurantiaco-fusco.
Adult Male (Kuphrates valley, 23rd February). Crown ashy blue-grey, the hinder portion tinged with
vinous; forehead and a line extending over and behind the eye black; lores and ear-coverts silky white,
the latter rufous posteriorly; upper parts pale isabelline-grey indistinctly barred and freckled with
darker grey and isabelline-brownish; primaries dusky brown, all but the first quill barred on the outer
web with buffy white; secondaries and scapulars barred and vermiculated with isabelline-brown or
rufous-isabelline ; tail chestnut-red, becoming greyish towards the tip; central rectrices like the back ;
chin, sides of the head, and throat blue-grey, sides of the neck dark ashy grey closely spotted with
white; breast pale vinous; flanks vinous grey, the feathers margined with black and rich rufous,
forming stripes along the sides; abdomen greyish white tinged with pale rufous; under tail-coverts
pale rufous; bill orange; feet and legs deep yellow inclining to greenish. Total length about 9°5 inches,
culmen 0°62, wing 5:15, tail 2°5, tarsus 1:25.
Adult Female (Euphrates valley, 17th February). Differs from the male in lacking the blue-grey, white,
and black on the head, and in being browner; crown, nape, and upper parts as in the male, but
browner and more variegated with rufous buff; sides of the head and throat buffy white barred with
Il
q
2
blackish grey, the chin nearly white; breast and flanks rufous buff, narrowly barred with dark grey ;
abdomen and under tail-coverts buffy white; beak browner than in the male. In size rather less than
the male, culmen 0°6, wing 4°8, tail 2°25, tarsus 1:15.
Tus beautiful little desert Partridge is one of the Asiatic birds whose range just extends to
within the limits of the Western Palearctic Region; for it is only met with in the extreme south-
eastern portion, in the Euphrates valley, where it has lately been discovered by Mr. Danford to
be by no means uncommon. It is, however, found throughout Persia, in Northern India, and
in Thibet. Mr. C. G. Danford, to whom I am indebted for the loan of his series of specimens
from the Euphrates valley, sends me the following notes :—“‘ Ammoperdix bonhami is to be found
in the valley of the Euphrates, near Biledjik, which point is probably the western limit of its
range. Though sometimes local, it is tolerably abundant, and frequents stony mountain-sides
and gullies from the level of the river to at least 1500 feet above it. It is most numerous near
cultivated ground, often occurring in company with Caccabis chukar. Its flight is quick, straight,
and short—in fact, very Quail-like; and it utters a very distinctive note on rising. ‘The coveys
seen were small, one of seven being the largest; but this was in February, when they had
doubtless been thinned by Hawks &c.
“We first met with them near the village of Bal-kys (honey-girl) while wandering through
the rocky valleys which probably constituted the necropolis of the ancient city of Zeugma.
Here we were startled from archeological dreams by the sudden rise of a covey of Partridges
new to our experiences. It was then too late to follow them up; so we returned next day, and,
by dint of hard work, managed to bag six brace.
“No bird could be more beautifully adapted to its habitat than this lovely little Partridge,
its coloration being the exact reflex of the pearly greys and fawns of the surrounding landscape.
The natives call it ‘Tchil keklik, a name which is also applied in other parts of Turkey to the
common Grey Partridge (Perdix cinerea), which it exactly resembles.”
According to Mr. Blanford (EK. Persia, li. p. 274) “the Tiht is found everywhere in Persia,
except the forest-region, from the sea-level to at least 7000 feet above the sea in Southern, and
not much less in Northern, Persia. They keep much to low hills and stony ravines about the
base of hill-ranges. During the spring and summer they are found in pairs and singly; in the
winter they are occasionally to be met with in small coveys, but by no means so frequently as
Caccabis, nor do they collect, as far as my observation extends, in equal numbers. ‘They may
usually be seen walking quietly up stony hillsides, not running so swiftly as most Partridges,
nor caring much for concealment; indeed when they wish to hide, it is sufficient for them to
remain still; for their colour so closely resembles that of the sand and stones around that they
are most difficult to detect. When they rise it is much like a Quail, with a rather quick flight,
and a whistle uttered as they start. Their ordinary call is a double note repeated several times.
They are excellent eating, far superior to the dry Caccabis, and only second, if they are second,
to the Francolin.”
Mr. A. O. Hume writes of this species (Stray Feathers, i. p. 226), “ Common in the Salt range
and in the hills that divide the Punjab from Afghanistan, and found, but by no means in equal
numbers, in those which divide Sindh from Khelat, and again in those which run up the Mekran
3
coast. In these latter localities I fully expected to meet with the nearly allied Ammoperdix
heyi, Temm.; but though we shot several birds, they proved to be all bonhami.” And this
gentleman further writes (Nests and Eggs of Ind. B. p. 541):—“ This Partridge is very common
and tame in the Salt range: a couple of dozen may be seen in a morning’s walk; and if people
are set to collect them large numbers are brought in. They are most generally seen running on
the bare rocks, or perching about the droppings of cattle on the mountain-paths ; but at ‘Tobur,
some 2000 feet high, the rainy-season residence of the miners, who during the rest of the year
reside in the Khewra Gorge (some 700 feet above the sea), and work the neighbouring Mayo
salt-mines, I saw several pairs running about on the flat roofs of the empty houses. The males
may often be seen perched on some rocky point; and the female in the spring, though less
commonly seen in exposed positions, will always be found close to her mate. ‘They run very
rapidly and glidingly over the rockiest ground, rise pretty readily, and fly smartly, always, if
possible, down hill. Both in gait and flight they remind one much of the Chukar.”
Dr. Jerdon states (B. of India, ii. p. 568), this “bird is only found in the Punjab, in the
Salt range of hills, more abundant across the Indus, on the Suleiman range, near Attock, and in
the Khyber and Bolan passes; and it is still more common in Afghanistan and Persia, whence
the original specimens were sent. It is there called ‘Tee-hoo.’ Gould states that it was also
brought from Thibet by Lord Gifford. Adams says that it is not found further south than the
Salt range; but a writer in the ‘Bengal Sporting Review, on the game of Sindh, distinctly
indicates it under the name of the Rock or Barbary Partridge as found across the Indus. It
frequents rocky ground with brushwood here and there, and is often seen in company with the
Chukar, which it much resembles in habits; is found in coveys, which, when sprung, rise with
a startling noise, and feeds much on a kind of wild thyme. ‘The flesh is said to be delicious.
The name ‘ Seesee’ is given from its call. Theobald found the eggs, twelve in number, of a clear
cream-colour, laid in a slight hollow among stones in the hills.”
Beyond the notes above given, I find but little on record respecting the habits of Ammoperdix
bonhani. It breeds in most of the localities where it is found; and its eggs are said to resemble
those of its ally, Ammoperdix heyi. Captain Cock, who found it nesting in the Salt range,
informed Mr. Hume (J. c.) that the nest is placed under a ledge of rock or between some stones.
He once found one under a cairn of stones that had been erected by the herdboys. ‘They lay,”
he says, “‘ from eight to twelve eggs, stone cream-colour, pointed at both ends, in shape and size
resembling the eggs of Podiceps philippensis. ‘The nest scarcely deserves the name; a few dry
bents, one or two feathers, and a hole in the ground is all the nest they prepare for the reception
of their eggs.”
Mr. Hume gives the size of the eggs of this bird as follows
1-0 to 1:1, the average of twenty being 1-4 by 1:03.
The specimens figured are an adult male and female from the Euphrates valley, both of
which are in my own collection.
length from 1:3 to 1:5, breadth
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
Py9
ZG
4
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,3, 6,2. Euphrates valley, February 1879 (C. G. Danford). c,d, d,2. Murdan, February 1871.
E Mus. C. G. Danford.
a, b,c,3,d,e,9. Biridjik, Euphrates valley, February 17th, 1879. f, 9, h, ¢
valley, February 20th, 21st, and 22nd, 1879 (C. G. D.).
1,9. Roum Kaleeh, Euphrates
>)
Genus FRANCOLINUS.
Perdix apud Brisson, Orn. i. p. 245 (1760).
Tetrao apud Linnzeus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 275 (1766).
Francolinus, Stephens in Shaw’s Gen. Zool. xi. p. 319 (1819).
Attagen apud Keyserling & Blasius, Wirbelth. Eur. p. 65 (1840).
Cheetopus apud Swainson, fide Degland & Gerbe, Orn. Eur. ii. p. 59 (1867).
Tuis genus includes a considerable number of species, chiefly richly coloured, as far as the males
are concerned, which inhabit the Ethiopian, Palearctic, and Oriental Regions, only one species
being found in the Western Palearctic Region.
They have much in common, as regards habits, with the common Partridge. ‘They frequent
dry rush-beds near water, plains where there is plenty of shelter in the way of scrub, and sandy
dry localities. They rise with a quick whirring flight, and fly direct and tolerably swiftly, but are
as easy to hit on the wing as a Quail. They feed on seeds, shoots, and insects, which they pick
up from the ground; and, unlike the Pheasants and Red-legged Partridges, they never perch
on trees. They walk and run with ease, and, like the Red-legged Partridges, will often run for
some distance in preference to seeking safety in flight. They make their nests on the ground,
merely scratching a hole in the soil in some well-covered place, which they line with a few
grass-bents, and deposit numerous eggs, which are of a peculiar buffy-brown colour and have a
few small white shell-markings scattered over the surface.
Francolinus vulgaris, the type of the genus, has the bill rather long, the culmen at the base
dividing the frontal plumes, gradually decurved to the point, which is narrow and rounded and
considerably overlaps the lower mandible; nostrils lateral, basal, placed in the lower anterior
part of the nasal depression, and covered by a hard rounded scale; wings moderate, broad and
rounded, the first quill shorter than the sixth, the fourth and fifth longest, the secondaries as
long as the primaries; tail short, slightly rounded, nearly concealed by the coverts; legs strong,
tarsus rather long and stout, anteriorly scutellate, armed in the male with a tubercle behind ;
hind toe short, anterior toes moderate, united at the base by a membrane; claws moderate,
slightly curved, moderately sharp.
165
121
y fees
}
*
\
Paez
, 2
Firy 1. . i tay Ee . 2 ie -
: nye A oF ne, : . : & f * ha b
'; i 4 f ¢ ye
_ Gap CMe Weak a oes oes ae u ya
UAT te es Reet P AA re ML er CES ames Oe fe. UALR as
~~ A * i
i 5 v4: j
} ¥ seers on i ‘ c 3 ie ee Bale,
: BOI Ost e ic BEA UES Pe PUAMEP pee ae Sans Re
§ ,
’
4 ~
47
ed
FRANCOLIN.
FRANCOLINUS VULGARIS
253
FRANCOLINUS VULGARIS.
(FRANCOLIN.)
The Francolin, Edw. Glean. Nat. Hist. v. p. 78, pl. 246 (1758).
Perdiz francolinus, Briss. Orn. i. p. 246, pl. xxiii. fig. 2 (1760).
Tetrao francolinus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 275 (1766).
Francolinus vulgaris, Steph. in Shaw’s Gen. Zool. xi. p. 319 (1819).
Perdix hepburnie, Gray, Wl. Ind. Zool. pl. 55 (1832).
Attagen francolinus (L.), Keys. & Blas. Wirbelth. Eur. p. 65 (1840).
Francolinus tristriatus, Bp. Compt. Rend. xlii. pp. 882, 953 (1856).
Francolinus asie, Bp. ut supra (1856).
Francolinus henrici, Bp. ut supra (1856).
Chetopus francolinus, Swains. (ubit) fide Deg]. & Gerbe, Orn. Eur. ii. p. 59 (1867).
Francolino, Italian; Turatz, Turkish.
Figure notabiles.
Edwards, Gleanings, pl. 246; D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 147, 148; Werner, Atlas, Gallinacés,
pl. 11; Gould, B. of Eur. pl. 259.
$ ad. pileo et nucha fuscis, centraliter nigricantibus: pilei postici lateribus et nucha ima albo notatis: torque
collari ferrugineo-castaneo: collo imo postico nigro, albo notato: dorso, scapularibus et tectricibus
alarum nigro-fuscis, ochraceo et ochraceo-albo notatis: remigibus nigro-fuscis, rufescenti-ochraceo
fasciatis : uropygio et supracaudalibus nigris, albo fasciatis: cauda nigra, versus apicem immaculata et
alibi albo fasciaté: capitis lateribus, gula, gutture et pectore nigris: plagd magna suboculari alba:
abdomine rufescente, albido notato et fasciato: hypochondriis nigris, conspicué albo guttatis: sub-
caudalibus castaneis, albo apicatis: rostro nigro: iride brunned: pedibus rufescenti-aurantiacis.
2 ad. pileo, nucha et corpore supra. sordidioribus, torque collari nulla, sed collo postico rufescenti-castaneo :
uropygio et supracaudalibus saturaté fuscis, pallidé brunneo vermiculatis et marmoratis et albido
fasciatis: caudd ut in mare, sed vix fusco marmorataé: capitis lateribus albidis, nigricanti notatis: strié
superciliari albid&: mento et gula superiore albis, corpore reliquo subtus albo ochraceo lavato et con-
spicué nigricanti fasciato et notato: subcaudalibus castaneis, versus apicem pallidé brunneo et nigro
notatis.
Adult Male (Meander valley, Anatolia, February). Crown and nape wood-brown, the feathers having
blackish centres, which are largest on the forehead; sides of the hind crown and lower nape marked
with white; a broad collar round the neck rich chestnut-red ; hind neck below this black, spotted with
white; back, scapulars, and wing-coverts blackish brown, varied with bright ochreous and whitish
ochreous; quills blackish brown, broadly barred with rufescent ochreous ; rump and upper tail-coverts
black, narrowly and distinctly barred with white; tail black, more broadly barred, except towards the
tip, with white; sides of the head black with a long white patch below and behind the eye; chin,
il
Gy)
ty
2
throat, except where crossed by the chestnut collar, and breast deep black; flanks black, very boldly
spotted with white; abdomen rufous, varied and barred with dull white; under tail-coverts rich chest-
nut-red, tipped with white; bill black; iris hazel-brown ; legs dull reddish orange. Total length about
14 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6°9, tail 4-1, tarsus 2°2.
Adult Female (Arpasa valley, Anatolia, January). Crown, nape, and upper parts generally much duller than
in the male; the hind neck is chestnut-red, but this colour is not continued round the neck; rump and
upper tail-coverts dark brown, irregularly vermiculated or marbled with light brown, and barred with
brownish white; tail as-in the male, but rather more irregularly barred, and slightly marbled with
brown ; sides of the head white, marked with blackish; a broad streak over the eye dull white; chin
and upper throat pure white; rest of the underparts white, washed with ochreous, and broadly barred
or blotched with blackish ; under tail-coverts chestnut-red, marked with pale brown, and black towards
the tip. Culmen 0:95; wing 6°8, tail 4:0, tarsus 2-0.
Obs. I cannot find any difference in specimens from India and Asia Minor, except in size, the former being
rather smaller than the latter; but the single example in Lord Lilford’s collection from Sicily is unusually
small, even much less than Indian specimens. The average measurements of adult males are as follows,
viz.:—from Anatolia, wing 6°9, tail 4:0, tarsus 2°15; from Sindh, wing 6:2, tail 40, tarsus 2°1; and
from Sicily, wing 5:4, tail 3°55, tarsus 1°8.
Tue Francolin inhabits Asia Minor, Palestine, the island of Cyprus, ranging eastward into India.
Now no longer found anywhere in Europe proper, except in the island of Cyprus, where it is
common, it appears still to be very generally distributed in Asia Minor, where, Dr. Kruper says,
it is resident, and is not uncommon in the swampy portions in the southern districts. It never
occurs in the immediate vicinity of Smyrna, but is met with at Scala Nova, near Old Ephesus.
Mr. C. G. Danford informs me, “it appears to be fast disappearing in Asia Minor. In Smyrna
it used to be found in the marshes of the Hermus, and in the neighbourhood of Ephesus, but is
now, I believe, extinct in both these localities. We first met with it (January 1874) in the
rushy tracts on the banks of the Arpasa, a tributary of the Meander. ‘There it was by no
means common. And higher up the country, in the extensive marshes near the ruins of
Hierapolis, where it is said to have been formerly abundant, it now seems no longer to exist.
At the mouth of the Meander, near the village of Domahtea, we again found Francolins, and
killed, by dint of a good deal of work among the rushes and oleander bushes, about ten brace.
On the sea-coast plains, more to the south-east, it is not so scarce, being tolerably common near
Adalia, and reported still more plentiful in other districts.” It is found in Palestine, and is,
Canon Tristram writes (Ibis, 1868, p. 212), ‘‘very abundant on the plain of Gennesaret, where
the coveys conceal themselves among the thickets of jujubes, especially near water. We also
frequently heard and sometimes saw it on the plains of Acre and Huleh, and on the lower
grounds of Esdraelon, near the Jordan. But it never voluntarily leaves its cover. Its flight is
heavy, rather like that of a Grouse; and it is perhaps the easiest of all game-birds to shoot on
the wing. There were seldom more than three or four together; but I have frequently found ~
half a dozen parties within call of each other. The cock bird begins to call from the middle of
a grass-field at the early dawn; and the cry is taken up and answered on all sides in an instant.
It is a very peculiar note, never forgotten when once heard, something like chuck, chuck, tee-
3
tee-tor. ‘The nest is very difficult to find, and I never succeeded in discovering it myself; but
some of our Arabs once brought in a sitting of eggs, all of which they succeeded in smashing as
they carried them in their cloaks.” Eastward the Francolin is found in Armenia and Persia.
Mr. Blanford informs me that he only met with the Francolin in the better-wooded parts of
Baluchistan, up to an elevation of about 2000 feet, and on the banks of the Shat-el-Arab, near
Bussorah ; but he believes that it occurs in places all along the coast of Southern Persia. To
this Major St. John adds that “it is found in the warm plains of Southern Persia, and the damp
forest regions of the Caspian, but not very abundantly in the latter. The northern limit is about
Lenkoran. West of our region it is found in great numbers in the tamarisk-jungles and reed-
beds of Mesopotamia.” Mr. A. O. Hume states (Stray Feathers, i. p. 226) that “in suitable
localities throughout Sindh, wherever there is water and long grass, the present species abounds.
About Kusmore, on the bank of the Indus, they swarm, and on the road between Shikarpore
and Sukkur they run backwards and forwards across the road in front of you as our Pheasants
do in Norfolk.” According to Dr. Jerdon it is found throughout the whole of Northern India,
from the Himalayas to the valley of the Ganges, but does not, that 1 am aware of, extend to
any distance beyond the valley of the Ganges, until above Allahabad, beyond which it passes
to the Punjab, and southwards through Rajpootana to Sindh and perhaps to Goozrat. Last-
ward it extends through Dacca to Assam, Sylhet, and Tipperah; but I have seen no record of its
occurrence further south in this direction, and it is replaced in Burmah by an allied species. It
occurs south of the Ganges, between that river and the Hooghly; and I have seen notices of the
Black Partridge having been shot in Midnapore and Cuttack; but it is certainly rare south of the
Ganges.” Mr. Blyth states, on the authority of Captain Beavan, that it is tolerably common in
Maunbhoom, where Francolinus pictus is not met with; and Dr. Leith Adams says that it is
common in cultivated localities in the lesser ranges, but is never found in the valley of Cashmere
or Ladak.
There appears no doubt that the present species formerly existed in Spain, Sardinia, Sicily,
and the Greek archipelago; but it is now quite extinct in those localities, and, as above stated,
the only portions of the Western Palearctic Region where it occurs are the islands of Cyprus,
Asia Minor, and Palestine. Lord Lilford, in an exhaustive article on the present species (Ibis,
1862, pp. 352-356), clearly shows that it was then undoubtedly extinct in every portion of
Europe proper, except in Cyprus, and that Dr. Bree had no ground for his statement that when
he wrote his first edition it still inhabited various portions of Southern Europe. Messrs.
Salvadori and Doderlein have sought to prove that the extinction of the present species in Sicily
is of very late date; and the latter refers to one having been eaten at a dinner at Terranova in
1869; but no recently killed example, or even feathers of one, sufficient for identification, have
been forthcoming, in spite of a heavy reward offered for a specimen; and it may therefore be
reasonably doubted whether the occurrences recorded really referred to the present species. I
need not, however, reproduce the mass of information collected by his Lordship in confirmation
of his.statement, but may remark that he appears to disbelieve that it ever occurred in Malta,
though this island is named by Temminck and Schlegel as one. of the localities where it used
formerly to be met with. He adds, however, one locality which appears to have been previously
omitted, viz. Spain, and writes (fom. cit. p. 304) as follows:—“It is remarkable that neither
4
Temminck, Degland, nor Schlegel should cite Spain as a locality for our bird, as, though now
extinct in that country, it was formerly common in certain favourable localities, especially the
neighbourhood of the Lake of Albufera, near Valencia: vide ‘ Catalogo de las Aves de la Albu-
fera,’ by Vidal, who, referring to the work published by Escolano, on the fauna of the Province
of Valencia, in 1722, says that the Francolin,—‘ Muy abundante en la Dehesa en tiempo de
aquel escritor, no se encuentra ya en semejante localidad.’ I saw specimens from the above-
mentioned ‘ Dehesa’ (a sandy strip of land between the lake of Albufera and the sea) in the
Museum at Valencia in 1856, which had been killed many years previously; but during a long
day spent wandering about the Albufera, gun in hand, and after inquiries amongst the fishermen
and cazadores of the place, I could only discover that, to use a Spanish proverb, the Francolins
were ‘idos y muertos y no tienen amigos.’ Olina, to whom I have before referred, mentions the
abundance of Francolins in Spain in his time, and tells us that they particularly affected plains
overgrown with ‘ramerino e spigo.’ I have been assured that Francolins were common many
years ago near Tangier.”
Lord Lilford further remarks that Olina mentioned it as being especially abundant in the
neighbourhood of Tunis; and a gentleman he met at Marseilles assured him that he had once,
and only once, met with and shot a pair near Philippeville, in Algeria; and I am indebted to him
for the following notes :—“ Since writing my paper on the extinction of this species in Europe
(Ibis, 1862, p. 352), and my controversy with Dr. Bree as to whether Cyprus could legitimately
be termed Europe, I have visited that island with the especial object of seeing the Francolin in
his native haunts, and as far as possible becoming personally acquainted with his habits and
economy. Before going into details on the subject I may as well say that the main facts in my
paper above mentioned are perfectly correct, with the exception of the entire extinction of the
bird in Sicily, as proved by Mr. Howard Saunders, and admitted by me in my account of the
cruise of the ‘ Zara’ in ‘The Ibis;’ however, I think, at all events, that for all practical purposes
we may now consider the species extinct in Europe in the usual acceptation of the term, though
I am glad to say it is not only to be found, but is abundant, in localities which come well within
the limits indicated upon your wrappers. In the island of Cyprus the bird is by no means
scarce, though at the time of our visit (April and May) they were paired and nesting, and com-
paratively difficult to find. I was (I do not know why) always under the impression that the
Francolin almost always affects the vicinity of water; but I was speedily undeceived on this
subject. There are many localities in Cyprus in which the bird was formerly common, where it
is now no longer to be found, without any apparent cause for its disappearance; this applies
particularly to the immediate outskirts of the town of Larnaka, where I am assured that twenty
years ago several brace might be shot in two or three hours, but where at present not a Francolin
is to be found.
‘Owing to the scarcity of good harbours in Cyprus, and the consequent danger of leaving
my vessel for any length of time, I was unable to explore the island so thoroughly as I wished ;
and I know well that there are many localities in which the Francolin is common, and which I
could not visit on that account. We first met with the bird amongst the sandhills which skirt
the sea-shore a few miles to the north of the town of Famagousta and the ruins of Salamis; and
thence to the eastward, in the promontory known as the Horn of Cyprus, we found the species
5
tolerably abundant. The country in this part of the island is partially cultivated with wheat,
cotton, barley, and other cereals. We generally found the Francolin in the immediate vicinity
of cultivated ground, though never, as far as I recollect, actually in the corn. The uncultivated
portions of the country are covered with a dense scrub of lentiscus and a species of juniper,
which in some places attains a considerable height, and is very difficult to penetrate for man or
dog. We were generally guided by the cry of the male bird, which is very peculiar, consisting
of three bell-like notes which are audible at a very great distance. By the action of our dogs I
am inclined to think that the bird runs off immediately on being approached for a short distance,
and then ensconces itself in the thickest low-growing lentiscus it can find, and will not rise until
almost trodden on. In our experience the male bird invariably rose first, springing straight up
into the air with a chuckling note and a whirring of the wings resembling that of the common
Pheasant. The hen would generally rise at the shot; in fact I hardly recollect an instance in
which we flushed the male without finding the female. I had the good fortune to find a nest
containing eleven eggs, which proved to be much incubated. This was on the 24th of April,
1875; the nest was placed on the ground in the centre of a dense low-growing lentiscus, and
consisted of merely a few dried grasses. The eggs were very unmistakable.
““T observe that Dr. Bree, in his second edition of the ‘ Birds of Europe’ (iv. p. 143), quoting
from Sig. Benoit’s work, says that the Francolin makes its nest under dirches and other bushes.
This strikes me as an extraordinary statement, as, though I am no botanist, I can hardly conceive
the existence of the birch in any locality inhabited by the Francolin.
“We also met with the Francolin in Cyprus, in the neighbourhood of Baffo, the ancient
Paphos, and often heard it near Limasol, though in this locality we could never induce it to rise.
We found nothing in the crops of these birds but the remains of coleopterous insects and a few
minute seeds. I was assured that within the last twenty years this species was exceedingly
common on the island of Rhodes, where it is now entirely extinct. We often heard the cry of
the Francolin after dark at night. . From my own observation I can fully confirm Sig. Benoit’s
statement as to the present species not perching, as it is stated to do by several authors.”
I am indebted to Mr. C. G. Danford for the following notes on the habits of this species :—
*‘Francolins appear to prefer dry rush-beds near water; but where such cover is not to be had
they will frequent ground where there is plenty of bush and myrtle scrub, and may often be
found at a considerable distance from water, but, according to my experience, invariably on the
plains. We always saw more hens than cocks; but that may arise from the former not being
quite such runners as the latter. They are both difficult enough to flush, and especially so in
dull weather, when it was often the work of hours to get them up from the rush cover, although
sharply pushed by the dogs all the time. When they do take to the wing it is ‘with a quick
whirring flight, which generally begins with a short perpendicular rise, and is afterwards straight,
level, and not long sustained. They are about as easy to shoot as a Quail of the same size would
be; even a Turk with his long gun can hit them flying, a circumstance much against their
chances of multiplying. The flesh is delicate and good, but has not a strong game flavour. The
weights of a full-grown male and female were 1+ Jb. and 1 lb. respectively. ‘The crops of those
which I examined contained various insects, barley-seeds, and green vegetable substances.”
I am indebted to the liberality of Lord Lilford for two eggs of the Francolin, obtained by
Z
p24
1
Gy)
2
fe C
6
himself in Cyprus. ‘They are warm buffy brown in colour, very much browner than any eggs of
the common Partridge I have seen, and have peculiar and very characteristic small white shell-
blotches scattered over the surface. In size they measure 136 by 14¢ and 124 by 142 inch
respectively.
The specimens figured are an adult male and female from Anatolia, presented to me by
Mr. C. G. Danford, and are those above described.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresccp.
a, 3, 6,2, Arpasa valley, Anatoha, J anuary 1874 (C. G. Danford). c, g.- Meander valley, Anatolia, February
1874 (C.G. D.). d. Bussorah, December 16th, 1871 (W. T. Blanford). e. Near Sakhar, Upper Sindh,
March 28rd, 1875 (W. T. B.).
E Mus. Lord Lilford.
a, dad. Sicily. 6, ¢, dad. Near Trikporno, Cyprus, April 24th, 1875. d, ¢. Near Ghalinopori, April 26th,
1875. e,9. Livadhia, April 23rd, 1875. f, 9,3, 4,2. Near Rhizokarpaso, Cyprus, April 29th, 1875.
2,3. Moulia, Cyprus, May 12th, 1875 (Lilford).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a,3. N. India (Marshall). , c, 2, d, e, f, d. Kurrachee, Sindh (W. B. Mulech).
Genus PERDIX.
Perdix, Brisson, Orn. i. p. 219 (1760).
Tetrao apud Linneeus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 276 (1766).
Starna apud Bonaparte, Comp. List, p. 43 (1838).
Tue true Partridges are restricted to the Palearctic Region, only one species being found as a
resident in the western division of that region.
They are amongst the best-known and most valued of our game-birds, and are found in
cultivated ground and open localities where there is scrub or other cover. They walk with ease,
consort together in coveys, and when flushed rise with a whirring sound. Their flight is swift,
direct, and strong ; and they will sometimes traverse considerable distances, though they generally
prefer to drop into the nearest available cover. They feed on seeds, shoots, insects, &c., which
they pick up on the ground. They never perch, like their Red-legged allies, on trees, but, like
them, are fond of dusting and sunning themselves in warm, sandy places. They nest on the
ground, their nest being a depression scratched in the soil and lined with grass &c., and deposit
numerous pale olivyaceous-brown eggs. The young when hatched are able to run about, and to
pick up food for themselves, but are for some time carefully tended by their parents.
Perdiz cinerea, the type of the genus, has the bill short, stout, depressed towards the tip,
which is rounded and sharp-edged; nostrils basal, lateral, operculate, linear in front, circular
behind, the nasal groove broad and feathered; a small space behind the eye bare; wings short,
broad, curved, the first quill shorter than the sixth, the third longest; tail short, rounded ; legs
strong, rather short, the tarsus anteriorly scutellate, the males having usually a knob behind;
toes stout, the hind toe small, elevated, the anterior ones webbed at the base; claws moderate,
curved, with convex ridge, rather obtuse.
166
p29
en erst
—— Fi e §
i
F ; ‘ cs ‘
\
+
a =
j { 2
U s 4 . & . ak * *
‘d £ S 4 - r 3
,
; i
‘ , ¥ 7
A Fs
3 {
pany Ss
“
47 4
Hanhart imp.
Neale lith.
Dp
PARTRIDGE.
PERDIX CINEREA.
475
ENeale hth Hanhart amp
PARTRIDGE.
FEMALE & YOUNG.
PERDIX CINEREA.
(PARTRIDGE.)
Perdiz cinerea, Briss. Orn. i. p. 219 (1760).
Perdix cinereo-alba, Briss. Orn. i. p. 223 (1760).
Perdiz damascena, Briss. Orn. i. p. 223 (1760).
Perdix montana, Briss. Orn. i. p. 224 (1760).
Tetrao perdiz, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 276 (1766).
Perdrix grise, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. i. p. 401 (1771).
Perdria grise-blanche, Buff. tom. cit. p. 415 (1771).
Petite Perdrix grise, Buff. tom. cit. p. 417 (1771).
Perdrix de montagne, Buff. tom. cit. p. 419 (1771).
Tetrao damascenus, Gmel. Syst. Nat. i. p. 758 (1788, ex Briss.).
Tetrao montanus, Gmel. ut supra (1788, ex Briss.).
Perdix cinerea, Lath. Ind. Orn. ii. p. 645 (1790, ex Briss.).
Perdix damascena (Gm.), Lath. tom. cit. p. 646 (1790).
Perdiz montana (Gm.), Lath. ut supra (1790).
Perdix vulgaris, Leach, Syst. Cat. B. & M. Brit. Mus. (1815).
Perdi« cineracea, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 525 (1831).
Starna cinerea (Lath.), Bp. Comp. List, p. 43 (1838).
Perdix sylvestris, C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 267 (1855).
Perdix minor, C. LL. Brehm, ut supra (1855).
Starna perdix (L.), Bp. Cat. Parzud. p. 13 (1856).
Perdvix grise, French; Starna, Italian ; Rebhuhn, Feldhuhn, German; Patrijs, Veldhoen,
Dutch;
445
CHARADRIUS FULVUS.
(EASTERN GOLDEN PLOVER.)
Fulvous Plover, Lath. Gen. Syn. iii. p. 211 (1785).
Charadrius fulvus, Gm. Syst. Nat. i. p. 687 (1788, ex Lath.).
Charadrius pluvialis, Horsf. Trans. Linn. Soc. xii. p. 187 (1822).
Charadrius xanthocheilus, Wagl. Syst. Av. Charadrius, sp. 36 (1827, ex Lath.).
Charadrius taitensis, Less. Man. d’Orn. ii. p. 321 (1828).
Charadrius virginianus, Jard. & Selby, Il. Orn. ii. pl. Ixxxv. (¢. 1850).
Charadrius glaucopus, Forst. Descr. Anim. p. 176 (1844).
Charadrius virginicus, Blyth, Cat. B. Mus. As. Soc. Beng. p. 262 (1849, nec Borkh.).
“ Pluvialis longipes, Temm.,” Bonap. C. R. 1856, p. 417.
Pluvialis xanthocheilus, id. tom. cit. p. 417.
Pluvialis taitensis, id. tom. cit. p. 417.
Pluvialis fulvus, id. tom. cit. p. 417.
Charadrius auratus, Schrenck, Reisen Amurl. Vog. p. 410 (1860).
Figure notabiles.
Jard. & Selby, Ill. of Orn. ii. pl. xxxv. (s.n. C. xanthocheilus); Temm. & Schl. Faun. Japon.
pl. Ixii.; Gould, B. of Austr. vi. pl. 13.
g esti. supra niger, leté aureo maculatus, pileo nigricantiore: scapularibus et tectricibus alarum fulvescente
et albido maculatis: ald spuridé brunned laté albo terminaté: remigibus brunneis, scapis plerumque
albis, ad basin et versus apicem brunneis: secundariis conspicué aureo vel fulvescenti-brunneo extus
maculatis, ala subtus grisescente: rectricibus brunneis, albo terminatis, pennis exterioribus albo irre-
gulariter transfasciatis, pennis centralibus fuscescente fasciatis: fronte lata et supercilio distincto cum
collo laterali toto puré albis: lineé angusta frontali, loris, facie laterali et corpore subtus nigerrimis:
corporis lateribus et hypochondriis albis nigro variis, pectore laterali aureo lavato: subcaudalibus albis,
nigro notatis : subalaribus fumoso-albidis: plumis axillaribus omnind fumosis, angusté albo terminatis :
rostro nigro: pedibus plumbeis: iride fusca.
Ptil. hiem. similis ptilosi zestivee, sed obscurior, et nigredine pectoris absente.
Adult male in summer plumage. Upper surface of the body black, especially the crown, varied all over with
spots and bars of bright golden colour; wing-coverts coloured like the back, but the golden spots not
quite so rich, and on some inclining to fulvous white, the scapulars also not quite so brightly spotted ;
greater and primary coverts brown, with a conspicuous white tip; quills brown, the shafts brown at
the base and at the tip, white in the middle, the secondaries much elongated, irregularly barred near
the tip with paler brown, and spotted with golden; upper tail-coverts obliquely barred with pale
greyish brown, and washed with golden; tail alternately barred with dark brown and pale smoky
brown, all the feathers tipped with white, and the bars on the two outer feathers nearly all white
instead of being smoky brown; a broad white forehead, extending backwards over the eye and forming
4 uv 2
444
2
a very distinct eyebrow, thence carried down each side of the neck on to the sides of the breast, thus
separating the golden back from the black breast by a very broad white line; a very narrow frontal
line, lores, cheeks, ear-coverts, entire throat, and centre of the breast black, becoming slightly mixed
with white on the abdomen and under tail-coverts; sides of the body white, barred across with black,
the upper breast tinged with golden and the lower flanks with smoky brown; under wing-coverts
smoky brown, with a dash of white here and there; axillary plumes entirely smoky brown, with a
white tip; bill black ; feet greyish; iris dusky brown.
Obs. The above description is taken from a fully plumaged male in the collection of Mr. Swinhoe, procured
by him near Canton on the 2nd of May 1860. We have not been able to examine a female in breeding-
dress ; for a bird of this sex procured by Mr. Swinhoe at the same time and place is only just beginning
to assume the black plumage on the breast. Probably, therefore, the full black breast is not assumed
in the female till some time after the male has attaimed his complete summer livery, as is the case
with many Limicole.
Winter plumage. Upper surface of the body much the same as in summer, but the golden spots not nearly
so rich in colour or so large, and all of them more or less tinged with pale fulvous; the nape rich
golden colour ; forehead and lores buffy white; the eyebrows and sides of the face a little brighter in
colour, and marked with small specks of brown; there is no indication of the white band along the
sides of the neck ; wing-coverts margined with whitish, with no trace of golden spots ; under surface
of the body buffy white, the lower part of the throat and chest marked with specks of brown like the
cheeks ; sides of the body and abdomen marked with obsolete mottlings of greyish brown, rather more
distinctly indicated on the flanks and under tail-coverts ; tail for the most part smoky brown, the centre
feathers slightly darker, with no traces of the transverse bars, but most of the feathers notched on the
outer web with golden or pale buff, the outer ones broadly edged with white, and slightly marked with
this colour in the body of the feather.
Young birds. The young, according to Jerdon (B. of Ind. iii. p. 637), have the colours somewhat as in the
winter plumage; but the yellow spots above are less marked, the breast is more dusky grey, and they
do not become so black the first summer as they do subsequently.
Obs. The very full account of the synonymy given by Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub in their ‘ Fauna Central-
Polynesiens’ leaves us little to say on the subject; but we do not see any difficulty in referrmg
Latham’s var. A of the Fulvous Plover, on which Wagler founded his Charadrius xanthocheilus, to the
present bird. It is clearly a specimen in full winter plumage. We are aware that Wagler’s title has
been erroneously applied as a synonym of Hudromias asiaticus ; but on this subject see some excellent
remarks by Mr. Harting (Ibis, 1870, p. 205). The name longipes of Temminck, by which the present
species is recorded in so many standard works and essays, does not appear to have ever been published.
Such excellent bibliologists as Dr. Finsch and Professor Schlegel have never stated the book in which
this title may be found, though they have both quoted it in their later writmgs. The first notice that
we can find of the existence of this name is in Prince Bonaparte’s list of wading birds published in the
“Comptes Rendus’ for 1856.
We now give an analysis of the specimens which the kindness of friends has placed at our disposal, inas-
much as great difficulty exists in determining the characters which separate Ch. fulvus and Ch. virginicus of
America. Lord Walden, Mr. R. Swinhoe, and Mr. J. Edmund Harting have placed at our service the
beautiful series of Golden Plovers contained in their respective collections, and an account of these birds
will be of use to the future student of the present species and its allies. Of the distinctness of Ch. fulvus
3
from Ch. pluvialis there cannot be much doubt, and an excellent dissertation on this subject is given in the
‘ Fauna Central-Polynesiens’ of Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub; but Ch. fulvus and Ch. virginicus are very closely
allied. In the above-mentioned work these learned ornithologists remark as follows :—“ With regard to the
American Golden Plover (Ch. virginianus) it is, from its grey axillaries and under wing-coverts and slightly
feathered tibia, so closely allied to the Asiatic Ch. fulvus, that it is very probable that they are identical.
Pickering’s observation to the effect that when at sea on the 13th of November, between the Sandwich
Islands and California, he procured specimens which were evidently migrating, is worthy of remark.
According to Schlegel, Ch. virginianus, Bp. (Pluvialis fulvus americanus, Sch.), is somewhat larger, and has
shorter toes; but Schlegel also remarks that there are specimens in which it is very slight, indeed scarcely
perceptible.”
The series now before us represents specimens from the following localities :—
Oxtp Wor tp.
North-eastern Africa. We have in our collection a single specimen from Djedda, on the Red Sea,
obtained by the late Mr. S. Stafford Allen, who gave it to Dresser. It is without a great deal of golden on the
back, and the scapulars as well as the tail-feathers are notched on the outer webs, not barred or distinctly
spotted with golden. The upper part of the breast and sides of the body are smoky brown, and the sides of
the neck are specked with brown. This specimen seems to be in full winter plumage, and agrees very fairly
with the description above given. Total length 8:3 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6:2, tail 2°4, tarsus 1:6, middle
toe to root of nail 1:05.
Siberia. Myr. Harting’s collection contains a specimen from Lake Baikal, shot there by Dr. Dybowski on
the 29th of November 1869. This bird is in curious plumage; for it retains plentiful remains of the breeding-
plumage. The black on the head and scapulars is very deep, the golden spots very bright, the tail transversely
barred instead of being notched, and the remains of black are apparent on the chin, breast, flanks, and abdomen,
constituting a large patch in the centre of the latter, nor has the black colour wholly disappeared from the ear-
coverts. On most of the feathers of the under surface there is a dusky centre to the feather, which is the
remains of the black plumage before it is entirely lost; and it is evident, therefore, that the bird changes into
its winter dress not by a direct moult, but by a gradual change of the black plumes into white ones; this ought
to be a good test for distinguishing old birds in autumn from young birds of the year, which could not have
had any black breast wherewith to cause the mottled appearance which comes from the remains of the summer
dress in the adults. Total length 8:3 inches, culmen 0:95, wing 6°25, tail 2°5, tarsus 1°55, middle toe, without
nail, 0:95.
India. A female specimen, with no precise indication of locality, in Mr. Harting’s collection has lost
nearly every trace of summer plumage, with the exception of two black feathers on the breast and some
indistinct mottlings on the sides of the body and under tail-coverts; the cheeks and sides of the neck are, as
usual, mesially mottled with brown. Total length 9 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6°25, tail 2°25, tarsus 1°55,
middle toe 1:05. Three other specimens are in Mr. Harting’s possession, from the Indian Peninsula, given to
him by Mr. Blyth. One, a male, is in complete winter dress, being buff all over the face and smoky brown on
the breast, the back brownish black, the feathers margined with golden. Total length 8 inches, culmen 0°95,
wing 6°25, tail 2:2, tarsus 1°55, middle toe 1:0. The two other examples, brought home by Mr. Blyth, are in
changing plumage, one having still considerable remnants of the black dress, the other being nearly in com-
plete winter livery. Total length 8:3-8°5 inches, culmen 0°95-1:0, wing 6°15-6°65, tail 2°25-2°4, tarsus
1:55-1°6, middle toe 1:0. One of these birds, it will be seen, has a very long wing and tarsus.
Ceylon. Mr. Holdsworth has very kindly lent us three specimens obtained by him at different times of
the year during his sojourn in this island. A female, shot at Aripo on the 8th of December 1869, has still
some tokens of its summer dress in the shape of the brown mottlings on the breast, and it has moulted all its
quill-feathers, except the longest primaries, which are shooting; no sign, however, of the moult by which the
445
446
4
summer plumage is assumed is apparent at this time of the year, judging from this specimen. Another male
bird shot at the same place on the 2nd of February of the same year is in full winter dress. A third specimen,
also a male, killed in the north-west of the island on the 16th of August 1866, has nearly lost its summer
plumage, and is very dusky underneath, owing to the brown mottlings and edgings which are left as the black
disappears from the feathers. Total length 8:5-9:0 inches, culmen 0:9-1:0, wing 5°9-6:1, tail 2:2-2°4, tarsus
1:55, middle toe 1:0-1:05.
Malacca. In Lord Walden’s collection is one of the late Dr. Maingay’s specimens from this country.
It still retains considerable remains of summer plumage, having the white band along the sides of the head
and neck still plainly indicated, and has a good deal of black left on the breast. In this skin the legs for the
first time, instead of appearing blackish, are of a dull ochre-colour. Whether this obtains in the living bird
must be determined from the observation of recent specimens. Total length 9 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6°25,
tail 2°35, tarsus 1°55, middle toe 1:0.
Java. Five specimens from this island are now before us; three are in full winter plumage, and the other
two are changing into it; out of the five, three appear to have yellowish-brown legs. Total length 8:0-9:0
inches, culmen 0°95-1:05, wing 6°25-6°4, tail 2°3-2°4, tarsus 1:5-1°55, middle toe 0:95-1°0.
Banka. An example in Mr. Swinhoe’s collection, received in exchange from the Leiden Museum, is in
winter dress, and measures as follows :—Total length 8:0 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6:1, tail 2:3, tarsus 1°5,
middle toe 1:0.
Borneo. One specimen, lent to us by Lord Walden, seems to be a young bird of the year, as there is very
little mottlimg on the breast, this part being almost uniform smoky brown, some of the feathers edged with
white. Total length 8-9 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6:05, tail 2:4, tarsus 1°6, middle toe 1:05. The legs are
much inclined to ochre-brown.
Timor. One of Mr. Wallace’s specimens, obtained in Eastern Timor, is now in Mr. Harting’s collection,
and has been lent to us by him. It is in full winter plumage, the brown centres to the feathers of the neck
being, however, rather distinct. Total length 9 inches, culmen 1, wing 6:4, tail 2°5, tarsus 1:6, middle toe 1.
Batchian. Mr. Harting has a specimen from this island, from which we have taken our description of the
winter plumage. Total length 8°5 inches, culmen 0°95, wing 6°25, tail 2°5, tarsus 1-6, middle toe 1. The legs
in this specimen seem to be brownish, as they are also in another example collected by Mr. Wallace in
Batchian, and now in Mr. Swinhoe’s collection. This bird has the cheeks, neck, and breast thickly mottled
with brown, the remains of the black summer dress. Total length 9:5 inches, culmen 1, wing 6:2, tail 2:3,
tarsus 1:6, middle toe 0:95.
Australia. Mr. Harting’s collection contains two specimens from this country, both in winter plumage,
although one of them still retains the remnants of brown mottlings on the breast and flanks. Lord Walden
also possesses a skin from Queensland, which has not lost the whole of the black plumage on the under
surface ; in this specimen the legs appear to have a tinge of ochre, and the other two are certainly tinged
with brownish. Total length 8:3-9-0 inches, culmen 0°9-1:0, wing 6°-4—6°65, tail 2°3-2°5, tarsus 1-6, middle
toe 0:95-1:0. In Mr. Gould’s plate of the species in the ‘ Birds of Australia’ the legs are depicted as greyish ;
and as he had the advantage of examining fresh specimens, too much stress must not be laid on the brownish
shade visible in the legs of winter-killed specimens, as this may only exist in the dried skins.
Obs. The absence of any dates to most of the specimens above examined prevents us from drawing any
satisfactory conclusions as to the changes of plumage exhibited by them. A series of careful observations will
have to be instituted before a complete life-history of the present species can be prepared. We now proceed
to examine specimens from Eastern Asia, having hitherto followed the range of the species along its western
course of migration to its southern winter residence.
Hainan. Mr. Swinhoe, during his recent expedition to this island, collected a single specimen of the
present species. Although this bird was killed in April it does not exhibit any signs of the approaching
breeding-dress, beyond the appearance of a few bright golden spots on the back and a slight tinge of the same
5
colour among the feathers of the upperside of the breast: the legs have a decided shade of brown. Total
length 7:8 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 6:4, tail 2°2, tarsus 1:6, middle toe 1:0.
Formosa. A series of seven specimens is now before us, all collected by Mr. Swinhoe, and contained in
his own collection and in those of Lord Walden and Canon Tristram. They are principally in winter dress,
though three of them exhibit remains of the black plumage on the breast. We notice a shade of brown on the
legs of most of these birds, it being more apparent in those further advanced in their winter livery. Total
length 8:5-9-0 inches, culmen 0°95-1:0, wing 6°2-6:6, tail 2°1-2°5, tarsus 1:55-1:6, middle toe 0:95-1:0.
China. Thanks to the perseverance of Mr. Swinhoe, we have in this country several specimens of the
Eastern Golden Plover, collected by him in different parts of China. One obtained at Foochow in October
1859, and now in Canon Tristram’s possession, is remarkably deep buff on the under surface of the body, with
scarcely any white on the lower part of the breast and abdomen. ‘Total length 9 inches, culmen 0°95, wing 6°4,
tail 2:4, tarsus 1:6, middle toe 1:0. Mr. Swinhoe has three specimens from Canton, procured on the 30th of
April, 1860; these consist of two females and a male, the latter bemg in full black summer dress, whereas the
hen birds have only a slight appearance of black coming on the breast, the one killed on April 30th being even
less advanced than the one killed a few days later. It is evident therefore that the female does not assume the
breeding-dress so soon as the male. Dr. Jerdon says that “the alteration of colour to black takes place as
well by a partial renewal as by a change in the feather itself” This change is exemplified in Mr. Swinhoe’s
specimens; for while some black feathers are just sprouting, in others the black colour is gradually spreading
over the plumage. Total length 7:5-8°5 inches, culmen 0°75-0:95, wing 5°9-6°3, tail 1:9-2°5, tarsus 1°5-1-65,
middle toe 09-10. The bird which presents the curious minimum measurements of the above specimens is
the female shot in May 1860. Out of eight examples of the present species from Amoy only one is in full
breeding-plumage, and that one was killed in May 1861. All the others are in different stages of winter dress,
one killed in September 1867 having still considerable remains of the black plumage. Total length 7:7-8:4
inches, culmen 0°85-1:0, wing 5:9-6°5, tail 2°2-2°5, tarsus 1:55-1:6, middle toe 1:0-1:05. Of the two males
in breeding-plumage the one killed at Canton has very dark legs, while the Amoy skin shows a strong tinge of
brown and ochre.
New Wort.
Specimens from different parts of America have a longer wing and tarsus than those from Asia; but the
specimens examined from North America run very close to the last-named birds. Thus a bird in Mr. Harting’s
collection, from the Arctic seas, killed in lat. 69° 30! N., long. 173° 20' E., on the 3rd of September, 1852,
measures as follows:—Total length 9 inches, culmen 0:9, wing 6:5, tail 2°3, tarsus 1:65, middle toe 1:0.
Mr. Harting has himself alluded to this bird in his paper on the Barrow collection at Oxford (P. Z. 8. 1871,
p- 115), and we cannot do better than produce his words here :—
“The characters by which these two may be distinguished have not been defined. Both are smaller than
the European C. pluvialis; and both differ from it in having the axillary plumes smoke-grey instead of pure
white. ‘The tarsus, also, is somewhat longer and more slender in proportion than that of the European bird.
I have now before me eight skins of C. virginicus from various American localities, north and south, and
fourteen skins of C. longipes from India; China, Australia, and the Malay archipelago. A careful comparison
of these gives the following results :—(1) That C. longipes is invariably smaller than C. virginicus, the respective
measurements being as under—
Bill. Wing. Tarsus.
inch, inches. inch.
(OL CURTHRUMS 6 Bie a ob vee ee al 7 to 7:4 16
OL UPTIME s 5 oo 6 8 5 6 6 Fo 6:4 to 66 15
C1, (UGS so 6 8 bo bp 75 1:4
(2) That C. virginicus at all seasons (but more especially in winter) has far less of the golden colour on the
447
6
dorsal plumage and on the breast than C. longipes has, the prevailing colour on the former bird being brown of
two shades in winter, interspersed with black and golden in summer.
“T have a Golden Plover in my collection which was taken at sea in lat. 69° 30! N., long. 173° 20! E.,
many miles N.W. of Point Barrow. This is the furthest point north, so far as I am aware, at which a Golden
Plover has been met with.
«These measurements, as well as the general coloration, show that the specimen is referable to the Asiatic, and
not to the American race, although it was met with much nearer to the American than to the Asiatic coast.”
Unfortunately we have not all the plumages of the American Golden Plover represented in the series
before us, and we cannot therefore give a detailed account of the changes through which the bird passes. For
comparison, however, with the Eastern Golden Plover, we give a comparative list of the measurements of the
specimens examined by us, as follows :—
No. Sex. Locality. E Mus. a Culm, Wing. Tail. Tarsus, Middle
inches. inch. inches. inches. inch. inch.
I, Moose Factory, Hudson’s Bay. J.E. Harting. 8:8 0:9 66 25 17 0:9
2. Texas (Heermann). do. 9°6 10 73 2°8 17 0:95
Bs @ do. do. H.E. Dresser. 9°5 10 7:0 28 17 1:0
4. do. do. do. 9:0 1:0 66 Ore ler 10
Day ae do. do. do. 9:0 1:0 7°2 2:8 17 1:0
6 Guatemala. J. EH. Harting. 9:0 1-0 7:0 29 17 0-9
(ns do. do. 9:0 10 71 26 17 0:95
oS Nauta, Peruvian Amazons do. 9°6 0:95 6:9 26 1:65 0:95
(E. Bartlett).
9. 3 Cosnipata, Peru (H. Whitely). do. 98 1:0 7:0 28 17 0:95
10. @ Tambovalley, Peru (do.). do. 10:0 0:95 67 27 1:7 i)
Ul, & do. do. (do.). Lord Walden. 9:0 0:95 6-7 26 16 0:9
A summary of these measurements gives the following result :—
Ch. virginicus: Long. tot. 8°8-10°0 inches, culmen 0°9-1°0, al. 6°6-7°3, cand. 2°5-2°9, tars. 1-6-1°7, dig. med.
0-9-1:0.
Ch. fulvus: Long. tot. 7:5-9:0 inches, culm. 0:75-1:05, al. 5°9-6°65, caud. 2°2-2°5, tars. 1:55-1°6, dig. med.
0:95-1:05.
It will be seen, therefore, that the American bird is almost always larger; for, though some specimens of
Ch. fulvus are nearly equal in size to Ch. virginicus, there are none of them which get the wing 7°3 inches
in length. The tarsus of the American species seems to us to be shorter, and the colour of the upper
surface always more grey, especially about the hinder part of the neck. Whether the summer plumage presents
any differences will remain to be seen.
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
The first Plate represents the adult male of the Eastern Golden Plover in full breeding-plumage, while on
the left is drawn a bird in autumn rapidly losing the black garb of summer. This bird is represented with its
wings raised, in order to show the smoke-coloured axillary plumes, by which it may be distinguished at once
from both the common Golden and the Grey Plovers.
On the second Plate is seen the bird in winter plumage (figs. 2 & 3); and the mottled appearance on the
breast, which we take to be the last remains of summer plumage, and to which we have made frequent reference
above, is represented. In the foreground is a Grey Plover in full winter dress. We believe that there will
now be no difficulty in recognizing any of the species of Grey or Golden Plovers in Europe by the aid of the
ii
four Plates we have devoted to the three species. A glance at the figures of the Grey Plover and Golden
Plover will distinguish them at a glance in their summer plumage, and the Eastern Golden Plover may be
recognized from the common species by its much smaller size, and by the bareness of the tibia. In autumn,
when the Grey Plover is spotted with golden on the back, and might be confounded with the Golden Plovers,
all three species may be determined by the colour of the axillary plumes, as represented in the Plates; thus,
apart from the question of the hind toe in Squatarola helvetica, the species always has black axillaries, while
Ch. pluvialis has these plumes white, and in Ch. fulvus they are smoke-coloured. These distinctions hold good
all ages of the birds.
THE present species has a very wide range in the eastern part of the Old World, but does not
often extend into Europe. It has once occurred to Herr Gatke in Heligoland, and, as will be
seen by the following notice, it has been now twice met with in Malta. In his “ List of the
Birds observed in the Islands of Malta and Gozo” (Ibis, 1864, p. 141), Mr. Wright observes :—
“Bree says that Charadrius longipes, a small variety or race found on the Asiatic sea-coasts, has
been captured at Malta; and Mr. Tristram writes to me that the specimen referred to was shot
by Colonel Drummond-Hay.” In his second appendix to the above list (Ibis, 1865, p. 463) he
writes :—‘‘I have to record the capture in Malta of a second specimen of this denizen of Asia,
which, always excepting that extraordinary rendezvous for exotic and little-known species, Heli-
goland, is the only spot in Europe in which it has hitherto been found. This example was shot
in May 1861. It was consequently in summer plumage; and, before handling it, I mistook it
for a small specimen of Charadrius pluvialis in bad condition. It was preserved by a Maltese
bird-stuffer, merely on account of its being in a state of plumage not noticed before in this island,
the common Golden Plover, its close ally, being known here only in its winter dress. Through
the kindness of Signor A. Zammit, who became possessed of it, I have been enabled to examine
and compare it with Charadrius fulvus.” It has likewise been met with in Algeria; for Loche
records a single occurrence near Kouba, in the month of December.
We have great pleasure in introducing to the notice of ornithologists what we believe to be
a new instance of the occurrence of the Eastern Golden Plover in Europe, communicated to us
by our friend Dr. Taczanowski, who writes as follows :—‘‘In November 1846, I met with one on
a plain about a league from Lublin, with a flock of Golden Plovers. It was easily distinguishable
by the great difference in size; and whenever it joined the flock the others chased it away. I
succeeded in killing it, and it is now in the Warsaw Museum. It is a young bird in its first
plumage, and agrees precisely with Asiatic specimens.”
As far as we can see, no record has ever been published of this species in North-eastern
Africa; but our collection contains a specimen from Djedda, on the Red Sea, shot by the late
Mr. 8. Stafford Allen. Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub write :—‘“‘ Its range extends not only to Eastern
Asia and Polynesia, but also to the south of Africa. In the Leyden Museum is an example
procured by Verreaux at Lataku. In Southern Africa its range probably inosculates with that of
Ch. pluvialis, as it does in Western Siberia. It is not known if Ch. fulvus extends its range to
Western Africa; but one would expect, as is stated in the ‘System der Ornithol. Westafrica’s,’ to
meet with Ch. pluvialis there. ‘This species can only be looked on as an accidental winter visitor
to South Africa.”
It is no doubt the bird called by Pallas C. pluvialis. He says it is rare in the northern
4N
449
450
8
parts of Russia, but exceedingly common, along with the Grey Plover, in Siberia, migrating
in the autumn in flocks, along with other species, to more southern localities, at the same
time as the Dotterell. It affects cattle-pastures and the banks of small rivers. Steller likewise
observed it in Kamschatka in autumn. It breeds within the polar circle. Dr. Taczanowski also
says that Dybowsky has sent individuals, in different stages of plumage, from Dauria and Lake
Baikal, and he has also obtained it from southern Siberia. Von Middendorff says that he observed
it on the Tundras of the Taimyr, at 74° N. lat., in full summer plumage; but large flocks only
appeared on the 4th of June. On the 17th of June they had eggs. On the 2nd of August they
assembled on lake Taimyr, to return; and after the 9th of August none were visible. On the
Boganida (70° N. lat.) they arrived on the 24th of May, and the last were seen on the 31st of
August. They nested on the moors of Uldskoj-Ostrog. He remarks that some of his birds, shot
in the high north, had the axillaries white, but that the birds procured at Uldskoj-Ostrog were
small and had brownish-grey axillaries, though the tarsi measured only 57°5 millims. Dr. von
Schrenck procured, through Dr. Maack, a female of this species, near Albasin, on the 15th of
June; and Dr. Radde observed it on the central Onon and in the Bureja mountains in September.
Concerning its occurrence in Japan, Mr. Henry Whitely writes :—“ Although this is by no means
a rare bird, I never had the opportunity of seeing one alive, all my three specimens having been
bought of native dealers in Wild Ducks, Grouse, and the like, on the 24th of September and the
3rd of October, 1865, respectively.” Mr. Swinhoe gives its range as throughout China. He pro-
cured it between Takoo and Peking, and says that it is a common bird near Canton, passing the
summer there. In Formosa, he writes, it is “common with us all the year round, breeding in
great abundance on the south-west marshy plains.” During his excursion to Hainan he also met
with it, and gives the following note :—“ This Golden Plover was common in the marsh near the
city on the 5th of February. We found it in the dry rice-fields of Paklai (W. Hainan), on the
21st of March, and abundant among the sweet-potato gardens of Hoitow (W. Hainan) on the
25rd of March. On the 2nd of April, at the part of Kiungchow, we found them on the beach ;
they were then beginning to acquire the black under dress of summer.’ Dr. Jerdon states :—
“The Golden Plover occurs throughout India in open plains, grassy downs, ploughed fields, and
on the edges of rivers, lakes, &c., associating in flocks of various magnitude, and feeding on
beetles and other hard insects, worms, &c. It has a shrill whistling call, and flies very rapidly.
Many breed in this country, even towards the south, as at Nellore, but some appear to pass north-
wards for that purpose, and to return in September.” The late Captain Beavan says “I found
this species tolerably abundantly in the neighbourhood of Julpigoorie, but I do not recollect it
in Maunbhoom. It is, occasionally, I hear, found near Umballah.”” Major Irby, in his notes on
‘ Birds observed in Oudh and Kumaon,’ says that the present species was found by him “in
flocks on the banks of the Logra and Choka, and occasionally on plains some distance from those
rivers.” In Ceylon Mr. Holdsworth tells us that this species is very common in winter in the
north of the island, sometimes extending as far south as Columbo.
It would be needless here to record the names of all the different Malayan localities where
the Eastern Golden Plover has occurred. In the ‘Museum des Pays-Bas’ Professor Schlegel
gives a list of the specimens contained in the Leiden Museum, more than sixty in number, and
these prove that actual specimens have been collected in nearly every island of the Malay
9
archipelago. It goes to Australia; and Mr. Gould, in his ‘ Hand-book,’ gives the following
account of the species:—‘ Although nowhere very abundant, this bird is generally dispersed
over all the colonies from Tasmania to the extreme north of the continent of Australia. In all
probability it is the same bird that is found in the island of Java, and more than probably the
species inhabiting India; its range, therefore, is very extensive. I obtained several specimens
on the banks of the Derwent, in Tasmania, observed it in small numbers on the flats below
Clarence Plains, and also killed examples on one of the islands in Bass’s Straits. Its habits,
manners, and general economy so closely resemble those of the Golden Plover of Europe
(Charadrius pluvialis) that a description of one is equally characteristic of the other. Like
that bird, it frequents open plains in the neighbourhood of marshy lands or the sea-beach, runs
with amazing facility, and flies with equal rapidity. Indications of the black colouring of the
breast or breeding-plumage begin to appear early in the spring, and as the season advances every
variety of colouring occurs, from the mottled yellow of winter to the uniform black under surface
of summer, which latter state, however, is but seldom seen; whence I am induced to doubt its
remaining to breed in any of the southern parts of Australia.” All over Oceania it likewise
seems to range; and a detailed account of the exact localities where the species has been met
with will be found in the above-mentioned book by Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub on the birds of
Central Polynesia. Dr. E. Graffe found this species at Tongatabu, and writes concerning it :—
‘They occur in flocks, which, on sand-banks which offer abundance of food, consist of from thirty to
fifty individuals; they run on the sand-banks left dry at low water, seeking for crustacea, small
fish, &c. If approached within gunshot, one will utter a shrill ¢wlt luli twi twi, which the rest
repeat, and then they take flight. At high water they frequent the open grassy places on fields
and fallows. This species is found all the year round at Tongatabu, but is most numerous from
October to March, and during the season of migration.”
The description of the egg is thus given by Mr. Swinhoe :—“ Its eggs, four in number, are
laid in a loose nest of dried grasses and fibres placed in a hollow. ‘They are of a yellowish-grey
ground-colour, blotched and spotted with deep blackish sepia, and have occasional obsolete
purplish-grey spots. They do not vary much in size, are narrowed near the end, and measure
1:5 inch by 1:1.”
In the preparation of the above article we have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. Sharpe and Dresser.
a. Djedda, Rea Sea (S. Stafford Allen). 6. Hakodadi, September 24th, 1865 (H. Whately).
E Mus. J. Edmund Harting.
a, 3. Lake Baikal, November 29th, 1869 (Dybowski). 6, 3. India (H. Blyth). c,d. Calcutta (HZ. Blyth).
e, 2. India (Deyrolle). f,9, 3,9. Java (Frank). h. East Timor (A. R. Wallace). i. Batchian.
j. Australia (Verreaux). &k. Australia. J,m,n. Amoy, China, May 1861, October 1866, and September
1867 (R. Swinhoe). 0, 2. Hakodadi, October 8rd, 1865 (H. Whitely).
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a. S.-W. Formosa (R. Swinhoe). 6. Foochow, October 1859 (R. Swinhoe).
451
452
10
E Mus. E. W. H. Holdsworth.
a, 6. N.-W. Ceylon, August 16th, 1866 (HE. W. H. H.). 6,c, 3,9. Aripo, N.-W. Ceylon. February 2nd
and December 8th, 1869 (LH. W. H. H.).
EH Mus. Lord Walden.
a. Malacca (Maingay). 6,c,d. Java (Frank). e. Borneo. f. Queensland. g. S.-W. Formosa (R. Swinhoe).
h. Amoy, China (R. Swinhoe). 1, 2. Hakodadi, Japan, October 3rd, 1865 (H. Whitely).
E Mus. R. Swinhoe.
a, 6. Banka (Mus. Lugd.). 6, 3. Batchian (A. R. Wallace). c. Hainan, April 1868 (R. S.). d,e, f, g, v.
S.-W. Formosa, 1861 (R. S.). 7,2. April 30th, 1860(R.S.). j,k, 6,2. Canton, China, May 2nd, 1860
(R. 8.). J, m,n, 0. Amoy, China, September, October, and Nevember 1866 (R. S.).
Genus SQUATAROLA.
Vanellus apud Brisson, Orn. v. p. 100 (1760).
Tringa apud Linneeus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 250 (1766).
Charadrius apud Pallas, Reise Russ. Reichs, iii. p. 699 (1775).
Squatarola, Leach, Syst. Cat. M. & B. Brit. Mus. p. 29 (1816).
Pluvialis apud Macgillivray, Hist. Brit. B. iv. p. 86 (1852).
THIS genus contains but a single species, Squatarola helvetica, which differs from Charadrius in
having a small hind toe, whereas the species included in the genus Charadrius possess only three
anterior toes. This bird inhabits the major portion of the globe at one season or another, its
range being given in the following article.
In habits the Grey Plover closely resembles its ally Charadrius pluvialis, frequenting the
same localities; but it appears to be, as a rule, rather more partial to the sea-shore than that
species and its congeners. Like them it feeds on insects, worms, &c., and will frequently wade
in the water up to its belly in search of food. It breeds in the extreme north, its nest being
like that of Charadrius pluvialis, placed on the ground; and it deposits four eggs, like those of
that species, but rather different in markings. Full particulars respecting its breeding-habits
are given in the appendix to the following article.
Squatarola helvetica has the bill about as long as the head, straight, rather stout; upper
mandible with the dorsal line straight to the end of the nasal sinus, then slightly raised, and
decurved to the tip, which is rounded but sharp; nasal sinus very long; nostrils linear, pervious,
subbasal; wings long, pointed, the first quill longest; tail moderate, rounded; legs moderately
long, slender ; tibia bare for about one third of its length; tarsus covered laterally and anteriorly
with small hexagonal scales; toes four in number, the hind claw very small and elevated ;
anterior toes moderate, stout, scutellate above; claws short, very slightly curved, obtuse, the
one on the middle toe dilated on the inner edge.
455
a
res
ie ‘ a
‘ hae
518
YOILINIAH = YIONVLVADS
“YSAO1d AAYO
6r
“SIIVIANTd =SMIYGVAVHS
"YaAOId NAGIOS
455
SQUATAROLA HELVETICA.
(GREY PLOVER.)
Tringa helvetica, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 250 (1766, ex Briss.).
Tringa varia, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 252 (1766, ex Briss.).
Tringa squatarola, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 252 (1766, ex Briss.).
Charadrius hypomelanus, Pall. Reisen Russ. Reichs, iii. p. 699 (1773).
Charadrius nevius, Gm. Syst. Nat. i. p. 692 (1788, ex Beseke).
Vanellus melanogaster, Bechst. Naturg. Deutschl. p. 356 (1809).
Squatarola grisea, Leach, Syst. Cat. Mamm. &c. Brit. Mus. p. 29 (1816).
Squatarola squatarola, Cuy. Regne Anim. i. p. 467 (1817).
Squatarola varia, Boie, Isis, 1822, p. 558.
Vanellus helveticus, Bonn. et Vieill. Enc. Méth. i. p. 1077 (1823).
Charadrius hypomelas, Wagl. Syst. Av. Charadrius, sp. 43 (1827).
Squatarola cinerea, Fleming, Brit. An. p. 111 (1828).
Squatarola grisea, Less. Traité d’Orn. p. 543 (1831).
Charadrius pardela, Pall. Zoogr. Rosso-Asiat. ii. p. 142 (1828).
Charadrius squatarola, Naum. Vog. Deutschl. vii. p. 265, t. 178 (1834).
Squatarola helvetica, Keys. & Blas. Wirb. Eur. p. 207 (1840).
Squatarola melanogaster. Malh. Faun. Orn. Sicil. p. 166 (1840).
Vanellus squatarola, Schl. Rev. Crit. p. Ixxxiv (1844).
Charadrius helveticus, Kjerb. Naum. 1850, p. 6.
Pluvialis squatarola, Macgill. Hist. Brit. B. iv. p. 86 (1852).
Squatarola wilsoni, Licht. Nomencl. Av. p. 95 (1854).
Charadrius longirostris, A. Brehm, J. f. O. 1854, p. 79.
Squatarola megarhynchus, A. & L. Brehm, Vollst. Vogelf. p. 284 (1855).
Squatarola rhynchomega, Bonap. Compt. Rend. 1856, p. 417.
Pluvialis varius, Degl. & Gerbe, Orn. Europ. p. 127 (1867).
Charadrius varius, Finsch und Hartl. Vog. Ost-Afr. p. 644 (1871).
Grey Plover, English; Vanneau-Pluvier, French ; Pivieressa, Italian; Chorlito, Spanish ;
Tarambola, Portuguese; de Goudkievit, Dutch; Kibitz-Regenpfeifer, German; Strand-
Brokfugl, Danish ; Kustpipare, Swedish; Rjanka Tooles, Russian.
Figure notabiles.
Gould, B. of Eur. iv. pl. 290; Yarr. Brit. B. ii. p. 413 (1843); Naum. Vog. Deutschl. vii.
Taf. 178; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. Afb. xxx. fig. 3; Gould, B. of Austr. vi. pl. 12; Aud. B. of
N. Am. vy. p. 199, pl. cccexv.; Schl. Vog. Nederl. pl. 217; Fritsch, Vog. Eur. Taf. 38.
figs. 7, 8.
456
2
3 esti. supra nigra, ubique cinerascenti-brunneo lavata, et conspicué albo transfasciata: capite antico et
laterali cum colli lateribus puré albis, capite centrali et nucha cinerascentibus et obscuré nigro marmo-
ratis: tectricibus alarum dorso concoloribus, majoribus magis cinerascentibus: tectricibus primariarum
et remigibus nigris, pennis minoribus extus ad basin albis, secundariis intimis cinerascenti-brunneis
extus albo maculatis et nigro irregulariter transnotatis; tectricibus supracaudalibus et cauda puré albis,
nigro transfasciatis: facie laterali, maculé alba infraoculari excepta, et corpore subtus nigerrimis :
pectoris summi lateribus, abdomine imo cum cruribus, subcaudalibus et subalaribus purée albis: his imis
fumoso-cinerascentibus: plumis axillaribus nigerrimis: rostro nigro: pedibus cinereo-nigris: iride
nigricante.
2 mari simillima.
$ hiem. supra cinerascens, plumis medialiter nigricantibus, albo marginatis: fronte et pileo laterali cum
macula infraoculari albidis paulld cinerascente variis: genis albidis obscuré nigricante striatis: tectri-
cibus alarum cinerascentibus dorso concoloribus sed latits albo marginatis: remigibus nigricantibus,
scapis medio albis, penuis minoribus magis cinerascentibus et albo terminatis, extis ad basin quoque
conspicué albis, secundariis intimis dorso concoloribus, nigricante transversim notatis, utroque pogonio
albo maculato: tectricibus supracaudalibus caudaque albis nigro transfasciatis, rectricibus exterioribus
feré omnino albis, sparsim nigro notatis: subtts albus, pectore antico et corporis lateribus cinerascente
variis: plumis axillaribus nigris.
Juv. supra nigricans, ubique aurato maculata: collo postico et laterali genisque cinerascenti-albidis, nigricante
variis, his clarits cinerascente striolatis: fronte, loris et supercilio lato albidis, héc nigricante lineato :
uropygio albo: cauda albé, aurato lavata: remigibus ut in adultis coloratis, sed magis cinerascentibus,
pennis minoribus extts ad basin conspicué albis, secundariis aurato lavatis et maculatis: subtus alba,
pectore superiore cinerascente et nigricante vario, paullulum aurato lavato: plumis axillaribus nigris :
subalaribus et subcaudalibus albis, illis imis fumoso-cinerascentibus.
Adult male in breeding-plumage. Forehead and sides of the head and neck white, this colour extending all
down the latter, and widening out on to the sides of the upper breast; centre of the crown dusky, owing
to the bases of the feathers not being completely obscured; hinder neck also a little dusky; back and
scapulars black, washed with ashy-brown here and there, and everywhere spotted or banded with white ;
rump more decidedly ashy brown, slightly varied with irregular white margins to the feathers; upper
tail-coverts pure white, with more or less complete bars of black across the feather ; upper wing-coverts
ashy-brown, especially the least ones at the bend of the wing, the feathers slightly mottled with black
and very thickly spotted and barred with white, the greater coverts entirely ashy-brown, irregularly
waved with white on the outer web, the outermost greater coverts and primary coverts blackish brown,
with only a spot of white at the tip; quills black, the smaller feathers white on the outer base, showing
a conspicuous white speculum, the innermost secondaries ashy-brown, spotted with white on the outer
edge of both webs and indistinctly marked with oblique bars of black; tail white, irregularly barred
with black, the two centre feathers ashy-grey towards the tip; sides of the face, with the exception of a
little white spot under the eye, and entire throat and breast black, the centre of the latter having one
or two white feathers; sides of the body, thighs, and abdomen, as well as the under tail-coverts, pure
white, the latter slightly spotted with black; axillary plumes black; under wing-coverts white, the
lower ones smoky grey ; bill black; legs greyish black ; iris blackish. Total length 10-5 inches, culmen
1:2, wing 7-5, tail 2°8, tarsus 1:65, hind toe 0:15.
Adult female. Similar to the male, but has the breast not quite so deep black. We state this with some
3
diffidence, not being quite certain whether it is the adult female or the young bird of the previous year
gaining his first breeding-plumage, which has the breast tinged with brownish. All the specimens
examined which had this tinge happen to be females.
Male in spring plumage. Much more white than in full summer dress, the approach of which is indicated
by the black which is appearing everywhere on the upper and under surface, the breast being for the
most part black, but mottled all over by the white feathers which remain.
Adult male in winter plumage. Above greyish brown, the centres of the feathers darker brown with narrow
black shafts and white edgings; forehead and sides of the face white, marked with lines of dusky brown,
which are most conspicuous on the cheeks; wing-coverts coloured like the back, but the white margins
to the feathers very broad, the outermost greater coverts as well as the primary coverts black, with a
white margin to the inner web; quills black, the shafts white in the middle, and the smaller feathers
marked with white on the outer web; upper tail-coverts pure white, with irregular bars of ashy brown
here and there; tail-feathers white, barred transversely with greyish brown, these markings becoming
narrower and more irregular towards the outer feathers, which are almost entirely white; under surface
of the body white, the lower part of the throat striped with ashy brown, the fore part of the breast and
flanks bemg indistinctly mottled with greyish brown; under wing- and tail-coverts white, slightly
marked with black, the lowest under wing-coverts smoky grey; axillary plumes black ; bill and feet
black ; iris blackish. Total length 12 inches, culmen 1:2, wing 7°6, tail 3:0, tarsus 1:7.
Young. Crown of the head blackish, with distinct spots of golden-yellow; forehead, lores, and a spot under
Obs.
the eye white, as also a very distinct eyebrow, which, however, is streaked with black; cheeks and ear-
coverts whitish, streaked with dusky brown, and distinctly washed with golden; sides of the neck
greyish, mottled slightly with black; back blackish, all the feathers having golden edgings, some of
them fading into white; wing-coverts coloured like the back, washed with golden, but a little inclining
to ashy grey; the greater and primary coverts clear ashy brown, with broad white margins; quills
blackish, the shafts white in the centre, and all the primaries narrowly margined with white round the
end of the feather, the smaller quills marked with white on the external base of the feather, being also
more grey in colour and broadly margined with white, the innermost secondaries blackish, spotted with
golden; rump and upper tail-coverts blackish, with spots of golden, the lowest coverts pure white; tail
white, with transverse bars and spots of greyish black, the middle feathers washed with golden; throat,
breast, and abdomen, as well as the under wing-coverts, white, the tail-coverts somewhat spotted on the
outer edge with black, and the lowest under wing-coverts smoky grey; the lower part of the throat and
fore part of the breast dusky grey, mottled, more especially on the sides of the breast, with irregular
streaks and lines of darker grey.
In the stage of plumage just described the Grey Plover is exceedingly similar to the Golden Plover,
being everywhere spotted with golden; but the present species may always be distinguished at all ages
by the black axillaries. The Grey Plover has also a much larger bill; and, of course, the hind toe gene-
rically separates it from the Golden Plover; but the black axillaries are an unfailing character, by which
the bird may be known, even in life. The young Grey Plover varies exceedingly in the amount of
golden colour on the plumage, this predominating in the young stage, and becoming gradually bleached
into white as the bird grows older.
Explanation of the Plates. In order to assist in the determination of the Grey Plover in its young or golden
stage of plumage, the bird has been drawn side by side with a Golden Plover, both beimg in autumn
3H
457
458
4
dress. The right-hand figure illustrates the Grey Plover, as will be seen by the black axillaries, these
being white in the Golden Plover, as exhibited by the flying bird on the right hand of the Plate. The
full winter plumage of the Grey Plover is illustrated in the Plate of the Hastern Golden Plover.
THE Grey Plover is one of the most cosmopolitan of birds, being met with in almost all parts of
the globe at one time or another. Breeding in high northern latitudes, it ranges in winter as far
as Australia and Southern Africa, and is also found at that time of the year in the Antilles and
Central America. We are unaware whether it occurs in South America, although Lichten-
stein gives the locality of his C. wilsoni, which Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub refer to this species, as
Bahia; but as he states that this place is in North America, we cannot place much confidence in
these specimens, uncorroborated as they are by the observations of more recent observers.
In Great Britain it is more common during the autumnal migration, although specimens, in
full breeding-plumage, are often shot in this country in spring. Mr. Stevenson, in his ‘ Birds of
Norfolk,’ observes that the “‘ Grey Plover, though, as compared with the Golden, at no time very
numerous, visits us regularly in autumn, and usually make their appearance on Breydon and
other parts of the coast the first week in October. About the beginning of May these Plovers
again make their appearance on their way northward, having at that time nearly completed their
full summer dress.” In Scotland Messrs. Gray and Anderson state that it is “very sparingly
met with on the coasts. It appears to be much commoner in the eastern counties than with us.”
Mr. R. Collett writes from Norway :—“ Breeds here and there on the fells, chiefly in the northern
part of the country, where it is found during the summer at Sulitjelma (teste Lovenhjelm), at
Nordkyn (Wallengren), and on several occasions in East Finmark (Nordvi). In the southern
portions of the country it is generally seen in the autumn, where it is found annually, chiefly in
flocks, near Christiania. It has also been shot at Frederikstad, at Christiansand, at Farsund, and
in the interior of the country at Mjosen and the Tyrifiord, and may probably breed on the
southern fells.” Mr. A. Benzon, of Copenhagen, kindly informs us that “this bird, called in
Danish ‘Strandbrokfugl, is only found in Denmark in September on migration, for a short
time, and is by no means common; I have on several occasions procured it. I have it also from
Greenland. It is very doubtful if it breeds in this country. Amongst eggs of Totanus glareola,
from Jutland, I have seen pale, slightly spotted eggs, which may possibly be those of this bird.
These are in the possession of Mr. Statsrevisor Fischer, and were figured by Bedeker, in his work,
as the eggs of the Grey Plover; but I do not look upon them as authentic.”
In Germany it is found on the coasts, but during migration is not often seen in the interior
of the country; and Schlegel says that in Holland it is found “on the coast in October and
November, and again in May on its northward journey.” De Selys Longchamps states that it is
common in Belgium on the sea-board during the double migration. In Alsace, according to
Kreener, it is “accidental in autumn during passage, is seen more seldom than the Golden
Plover.” Degland and Gerbe record that it appears periodically in France on the sea-coasts, and
in the interior of the country on its double migration. It is found from the middle of May to
the middle of July, and in August and September. Messrs. Jaubert and Barthélemy-Lapomme-
raye state that in the south of France these birds are found on passage in November and the end
of March. Bailly writes :—‘“ Passes through Switzerland and Savoy periodically in the middle of
5
March and commencement of April, at the same time as the Golden Plover and Lapwing; passes
also southward in the autumn.” Mr. Howard Saunders sends us the following note :—“ This
species is abundant on the autumn and spring migrations through southern Spain; but during the
winter months I found but few in the markets, and the majority evidently proceed further south.
I obtained individuals with full black breasts as late as the 17th, at Malaga, and birds of the
previous year on the 23rd of May.” Major Irby also writes to us:—“ In Andalusia I have found
this species an autumnal migrant; but it occurs on the coast occasionally in winter. ‘The first
seen was on the 9th of November, and the last on the 22nd of May, when I shot a pair near
Gibraltar, the male far advanced and, indeed, in nearly perfect breeding-plumage, the female
being not in quite such a forward state.” Mr. Tyrwhitt Drake found it in Morocco; and Loche
says that it is only accidental, during migration, on the coasts of Algeria. Bolle procured it in
the Canary Islands in winter. In Italy and Sicily it is also a passing migrant; and Lord Lilford
observes :—“ I occasionally saw this species in Corfu and Epirus in January, February, and March
1857. Some specimens, killed in the island in the latter month, were in full breeding-plumage.
I never saw the Grey Plover in large troops, but almost invariably in pairs, or small parties of
four or five individuals.”
Lindermayer says that it ‘‘arrives in autumn ; and a few winter in Greece, leaving again early in
March. Von der Miihle agrees with the above, and remarks that he has seen birds there in May
in nearly full breeding-plumage. Mr. Robson says that in Turkey and Asia Minor they are not
uncommon, many specimens being shot in the autumn by sportsmen for the table; several stay
over the winter. Canon Tristram records it as a “ winter visitant to Palestine, where it is found
in thousands in the plains and cultivated lands.” Von Nordmann says that is very common in
spring and summer in the provinces of New Russia, where, however, it does not winter.
Lehmann, during his journey to Bokhara, procured a single specimen from the Caspian
steppe. Pallas states that it occurs all over Siberia. Von Middendorff observed it “ breeding both
in the Byrranga mountains (74° N. lat.), and also on the Boganida (71° N. lat.), although much
rarer than the Golden Plover; and Radde found a pair near the Onon in September 1856, and
von Kittliz met with it in Kamschatka. Mr. Swinhoe states that it is a winter visitant to the
coasts of China and Formosa from the north. He also writes, “a specimen of the Grey Plover
was shot on the mud of the Hungpe lagoon in West Hainan on the 30th of March.” The same
author, writing on the ‘ Birds of Northern Japan,’ observes :—“ Included in Cassin’s list; but he
surely must refer to the allied form C. mongolicus, Pall., though Cassin appears rather positive as
to itsidentity:” there can be no doubt, however, that the bird visits Japan, as it was procured there
by Siebold. Dr. Jerdon, in his ‘ Birds of India,’ gives the following note :—“ The Grey Plover is
found occasionally throughout India in the cold season, chiefly, perhaps, near the sea-coast and in
the north of India. I have obtained it from the Madras market, and seen it north-east of
Calcutta on the banks of large rivers. It associates in moderate-sized flocks, and is somewhat
wary.” Itis distributed throughout Malasia, having been obtained in Java by Horsfield, while
the Leyden Museum contains examples from Borneo, Timor, Gilolo, and New Guinea. According
to Mr. Gould it occurs both in Eastern and Western Australia.
In Africa it only occurs as a winter visitant. Captain Shelley has several examples procured
in Egypt; and Lichtenstein records a specimen from Arabia. Petherick obtained it in Kordofan ;
3H 2
459
460
6
and von Heuglin states that it is found along the shores of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden in
winter. Daubeny shot it at Arkeko; and further down on the eastern coast it has been obtained
by Dr. John Kirk on the island of Zanzibar. Captain Sperling also remarks that he found it
“common at Zanzibar, where he procured young birds in November.” Sganzin met with it
in Madagascar, and Mr. Edward Newton has included it among the birds of the Seychelles and
Mauritius. Mr. Layard in his ‘ Birds of South Africa,’ states:—“I have never seen the Grey
Plover in the summer or breeding-plumage in this country ; but many specimens in winter dress
have occurred to me both here and on the east coast of Africa, where, as far as 14° south, I shot
it in considerable numbers.” Our friend Mr. J. H. Gurney informs us that the Grey Plover is
common on the Damara coast, and also occurs in Trans Vaal and Northern Natal. One specimen
from Damara Land was in partly breeding-plumage. On the west coast of Africa it has been
obtained on the Muni river by Du Chaillu; and Pel sent home specimens from the Gold Coast
which he had shot there in February and December. Verreaux also has received it from
Senegambia.
Reinhardt says that it ‘“ occurs in very limited numbers” in Greenland; and Audubon has
noted that he found it breeding in North America. Captain Blakiston writes :—“ I fancied this
bird was confined to Hudson’s Bay, whence I have received a specimen, as well as Mr. Murray ;
and one is recorded thence in the ‘ Fauna Boreali-Americana; but I now observe that it has
been found by Mr. Ross on the Mackenzie, but it is rare.” Professor Baird remarks that,
‘“‘this almost universally distributed species occurs on the sandy flats of Chiapam, and is usually
seen in company with the flocks of Zringe@ and the like;’ and Dresser in his paper on the
‘ Birds of Southern Texas’ gives the following note :—‘ On the 6th of September 1863, at the
salt-ponds in the sandy desert between the San Colorado and King’s Rancho, I shot one specimen
(which was well marked with black), and killed another on Galveston Island on the 26th of May
1864; but I skinned neither of them.” Mr. G. H. White obtained it in the vicinity of the city
of Mexico; and Mr. Osbert Salvin, writing on the Sea-birds and Waders of the Pacific coast of
Guatemala, says, ‘“‘Grey Plovers were occasionally seen, their unmistakable black axillary
feathers enabling one to distinguish the species at a distance.” It has also been obtained in the
Bahamas by the late Mr. Bryant; and Lieut. Wedderburn obtained it in the Bermudas in
September. In Jamaica it likewise occurs, and, according to Gundlach, inhabits Cuba from
August to April. Léautaud found it in Trinidad in August and October.
A very good account of the habits of the Grey Plover has been given by Baron Droste-
Hiilshoff in his work on the Birds of Borkum :—“ It passes here late in May, and again occurs
on the southward migration in August and early in September. It is a fine lively bird, and
carries its head and body erect, and its breast thrown forward. In running backwards it re-
sembles the Golden Plover; and before flying, like that bird, it always lifts the wings high above
its head. Its flight is peculiarly swift, more so than that of most other shore-birds. It flies
off in a straight line, now approaching and now leaving the ground in easy dips. It extends
the wings far, and flies with powerful strokes. On the wing it appears thick-headed, slight in
form and with very pointed wings, and these appear bowed into a sickle-shape. ‘The general
colour appears whitish with two black patches, the black axillaries showing very clearly. It has
a peculiar appearance; and an eye but little experienced can easily distinguish it. Its call-note
’
7
is a sharp whistle, 77j-e-2h, which cannot be mistaken for the Ziti of the Golden Plover; the final
note is very softly sounded. On the wing they repeat this note with long pauses; and sitting
they call to each other and repeat the latter portion when any of their own species settle down
beside them. At sunset they are most uneasy, and fly about, calling continually, late into the
night. They repeat the call-note so quickly that it becomes a regular ‘jodel’ call; and when a
couple quarreled, they called loudly Tijz Tijzt. It is a very watchful and shy bird, and carefully
avoids every suspicious-looking mound, seldom approaching a place where the sportsman is hid;
it is therefore the sentinel of other shore-birds, which it warns by its sudden flight and loud
alarm-note; and its fondness of company renders it their leader. .... In the autumn it frequents
the shores only, going on to the grass when driven thither by high tides; but, peculiarly enough,
in the spring it frequents the water-meadows and seldom visits the shore. I did not, however
see any by the fresh water; but they generally lived on places far from water, scarcely damp, and
covered with short grass. Late in the year it is also found on the muddy shores of the rivulets
far out on the shore at ebb-tide, on flat places where numerous shore-worms are found, and picks
up small worms here, picking about amongst the sea-herbage. It also picks out the shore-worms.
On the edge of the water it seeks its food in the foam, and, like the Sandpipers, wades up to its
belly in the water.”
Lord Lilford, in his well-known essay on the ornithology of Corfu and Epirus, notices the
following remarkable fact in connexion with the present species :—‘'This bird has a curious
habit which I do not recollect to have seen mentioned in any work on ornithology, of throwing
somersaults in the air, in the same manner as the Tumbler Pigeon and Roller. I noticed this
particularly in March 1857, on the Gulf of Arta, about the mouth of the Luro river, where a few
of this species are generally to be seen.”
The egg of the Grey Plover was for a long time a desideratum in the best European collec-
tions; and even now authentic specimens are exceedingly rare. We therefore make no apology
for giving all the observations published on the breeding of the bird, which we have met with.
Von Middendorff, to whom we are indebted for our knowledge of the bird’s nesting-habits, gives
the following account :—“ Earlier than the 25th of May none of these birds were observed on
the Boganida, and on the 26th of June the females were sitting there on their nests, which were
formed by collecting together dry leaves and grasses, and in which were four eggs. As nothing
reliable is known about these latter, and I have in vain looked for an illustration of them in
Thienemann’s new work, I give the following particulars respecting them. In form the eggs of
the Grey Plover agree with those of the Lapwing (Vanellus cristatus) and the Dotterel (Chara-
drius morinellus), but are larger than either, though in this respect the eggs of this bird differ
considerably. The average size is about 54 millims. in length by 36 millims. in largest diameter.
The largest eggs I have seen were about 2 millims. longer; on the other hand, the smallest were
48 millims. long by 36 millims. in diameter. Sometimes the smallest eggs of the Grey Plover
are exceeded in length by those of the Golden Plover; but the latter are invariably narrower, not
exceeding 33 millims. in breadth; nor does the colour offer any distinctive mark. The ground-
colour is sometimes yellowish grey, sometimes brownish yellow; and the dark brown spots are
distributed on the egg as on the eggs of the Golden Plover.
“The females which I saw had, even in the fullest summer plumage, an irregular white stripe
461
8
extending from the median line over the black of the breast and abdomen, which distinguished
them from the males.”
Professor Newton, when exhibiting a specimen of the egg at a Meeting of the Zoological
Society, makes the following remarks :—“ The egg of this cosmopolitan species has been con-
fessedly one of the rarest and most sought for by collectors. It is now well known that Sir John
Richardson must have been mistaken in his assertion (‘ F. B.-A.’ 11. p. 370) that the Grey Plover
breeds in Pennsylvania.” He also adds:—‘“ The specimen which I now have the pleasure of
exhibiting was sent me a few months ago by my friend Dr. Baldamus, who received it from
Councillor von Middendorff. This intrepid traveller states (‘Sib. Reise, II. ii. p. 290) that the
bird breeds on the Byrranga Mountains, in latitude 74° N., as well as on the Boganida, in latitude
71° N., and that it is much less common there than Charadrius pluvialis. He found a nest on
June 26th with four eggs, which he describes with some minuteness, besides figuring an example
(t. 19. f. 1). They greatly resemble in character those of the Lapwing (Vanellus cristatus) and
Dotterel (Hudromias morinellus), but are much larger. My specimen is, I believe, a good deal
under the average size ; and yet it ismore bulky than any Golden Plover’s that I have, thereby con-
firming Von Middendorff’s remark. With it Dr. Baldamus sent me a memorandum, bearing the
autograph of the discoverer, as follows:—‘ Squatarola helvetica, s, 43, fluv. Taimyr, 74°.—
Middff.’ ”
In Dresser’s collection is one egg of this bird obtained by Dr. Middendorff on the Boganida
on the 30th of June, and by him deposited, with several others, in the Petersburg Museum,
whence Dresser procured it. In shape this egg is rather more elongated and tapers sharper at
the smaller end than eggs of Charadrius pluvialis; and the markings are more irregular and
fantastical, there being no distinct almost round spots, so common in the Golden Plover’s. The
ground-colour is dull clay-brown, like that in many Golden-Plovers’ eggs; and the markings,
which are distributed over the surface of the egg, but collect together somewhat at the larger
end, are dark blackish brown, and irregular and distorted in shape. Here and there a few
purplish underlying shell-markings show themselves. It measures 23% by 146 inch.
Mr. Swinhoe once kept a Grey Plover in confinement; and this bird never assumed the black
dress while in captivity, but retained its winter plumage all the summer through.
The descriptions and figures of the adult bird in breeding-plumage, and the young in autumn,
are taken from specimens in our collection, shot in Pagham Harbour, while the winter dress is
described from a fine specimen killed at Blakeney by Mr. Buxton and now in the possession of
Mr. J. H. Gurney, Jun. This bird is figured in the last-named stage of plumage, on the plate of
the Eastern Golden Plover.
In conclusion, we must acknowledge the great assistance we have derived from the article on
the Grey Plover in the Vogel Ost-Afrika’s of Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub, where the synonymy is
most thoroughly and completely worked out.
465
In the preparation of the above article we have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. Sharpe and Dresser.
a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h. Pagham, Sussex (A. Grant). 7. Christiania (A. Collett). j. Denmark (4. Benzon). k.
Germany (W. Schliiter). J. Barcelona, Spain (H. EL. D.). m. New Jersey (J. Krider). n. Mexico
(G. H. White).
E Mus. J. H. Gurney, jun.
a. Greatham, Durham (J. H.G.). 4. Yarmouth (Gunn). c. Wells (Gunn). d. Blakeney (Buxton). e.
Worthing (Wells). jf. St. Petersburg (J. H. G.).
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a. Navarino, Greece (H. B. T.). 4. Pagham, Sussex (J. E. Harting).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a, 6, c. Malaga (#H. S.).
E Mus. Lord Lilford.
a. Marisma, Guadalquivir, near Seville (L.).
O19
M&NHanhart imp
J.GKeulemans lith
{. SQUATAROLA HELVETICA.
2. CHARADRIUS PLUVIALIS. \
SQUATAROLA HELVETICA.
; APPENDIX A.
WuEN the article on this species was issued, in an early part of the present work, all the infor-
mation that could be obtained respecting its nidification consisted of the observations made by
Von Middendorff during his journey to Northern Siberia; and it was not then supposed that the
Grey Plover bred anywhere within the limits of the Western Palearctic Region. Amongst the
interesting discoveries, however, made last spring (1875) by Messrs. Harvie-Brown and Seebohm,
who brought so many rarities back from the Petchora river, in Northern Russia in Europe, not
the least important is that of the nidification of the present species, which they found breeding
in tolerable numbers; and I am indebted to the latter of these gentlemen for the following
interesting notes:—‘‘ When Harvie-Brown and I planned our expedition to the Petchora we
thought it was within the range of possibility that we might return with eggs of the Grey
Plover. As the migratory birds began to arrive at Ust Zylma we kept a sharp look-out for the
Grey Plover as one of the specialities of our trip. On the 17th May, the second day of summer,
the Golden Plover arrived. We carefully examined every flock of these birds that passed us,
and never lost an opportunity of shooting a bird; but as all the migratory birds arrived one after
another without any signs of the Grey Plover, we gradually gave up our hope of obtaining their
eggs. Nor did our journey down the river do much to reassure us. At Pustazursk (or, as the
Russians on the Petchora call it, Gorodok, or the town) we found the Golden Plover, but no signs
of the Grey Plover. One fact, however, encouraged us. In the delta of the Petchora we found
several species of birds in considerable numbers, and unquestionably migratory birds, which we
had not seen in Ust Zylma, and which could not possibly have passed through in such numbers
without our having seen something of them. It was perfectly obvious that Ust Zylma was
somewhat out of the line of migration, and that the majority of birds intending to breed on the
tundra would only follow the valley of the Petchora as far as the Ussa, and would then strike
direct across the comparatively flat country to their breeding-places. We ascertained afterwards,
by reference to a work published by the Museum at Kasan, that small flocks of Grey Plovers are
seen in most years in May and September near that town. The Grey Plovers wintering on the
shores of the Mediterranean would probably leave by way of the Black Sea, cross by the Sea of
Azoyv to the Volga near Sarepta, follow the Volga to Kasan, and thence take the valley of the
Kama through Perm to Tcherdin, close to the source of the Petchora.
“We arrived at Alexievka on the evening of the 19th June, and on the 22nd crossed the
river to the land of promise, the Aarka Ya of the Samoyedes, the Bolshai Semlia of the Russians,
the mysterious tundra (a sort of ornithological Cathay) of our little party. We mustered seven
altogether—our two selves, our interpreter Piottuch, and our crew of four, two Russians, a
Samoyede, and a halfbreed. It was a bright warm day; the wind had dropped; and it was too
early in the season for the mosquitoes to be troublesome. ‘The tundra forms the east bank of
the Petchora; and we had to climb up a steep cliff (perhaps 60 feet high), a crumbling slope of
465
466
2
clay-earth, sand, gravel, turf, but no rock. We then looked over a gently rolling prairie country,
stretching away to a flat plain, beyond which was a range of low rounded hills, some eight or ten
miles off. It was in fact a moor with here and there a large flat bog, and everywhere abundance
of lakes. For seven or eight months in the year it will be covered with from two to three feet
of snow. Snow was still lying in large patches in the more sheltered recesses of the steep river-
banks; and on one of the lakes a large floe of ice, six inches thick, was still unmelted. ‘The
vegetation on the dry parts of the tundra was chiefly carices, moss, and lichen, of which the
familiar reindeer-moss was especially abundant. In some places there were abundance of
cranberries with last year’s fruit still eatable, preserved by the frost and snow of winter. Here
and there we met with a dwarf shrub not unlike a rhododendron, with a white flower and
aromatic-scented leaves (Ledum palustre), a heath-like plant with a pale red flower (Andromeda
polifolia), and dwarf birch (Betula nana) running on the ground almost like ivy. The fat boggy
places had evidently been shallow lakes a few weeks ago after the sudden thaw, and were now
black bog, in the middle grown over with yellow-green moss, and carices towards the edge. They
were separated from each other by tussocky ridges of moor, which intersected the plain like the
veins on the rind of a melon. We found no difficulty in going where we liked ; our india-rubber
waterproofs were all-sufficient. We crossed the wettest bogs with impunity, seldom sinking more
than a foot before coming upon a good foundation, a solid pavement of ice. Birds were but
thinly scattered over the ground; but there were sufficient to keep our curiosity on the qui vive.
The commonest bird was the Lapland Bunting; and we took two of their nests in the tussocky
ridges between the little bogs. ‘The next commonest bird was the Red-throated Pipit; and we
took two of their nests in similar positions. As we marched across the tundra we fell in with
some Dunlins, and took a couple of their nests. This was encouraging. ‘The Dunlin was a bird
we had not seen at Ust Zylma, and one doubtless that migrated direct across country from
Ust Ussa. We had not walked more than a couple of miles inland before we came upon
a small party of Plovers. ‘They were very wild, and we found it impossible to get within shot
of them; but a distant view through our binocular almost convinced us that we had met with
the Grey Plover at last. We had not walked very far before other Plovers rose; and we
determined to commence a diligent search for the nest, and offered half a rouble to any of
our men who should find one. Our interpreter laughed at us, and marched away into the tundra
with a ‘cest impossible, Monsieur.’ We appealed to our Samoyede, who stroked his beardless
chin, and cautiously replied ‘mozhna.’ ‘The other men wandered aimlessly up and down; but
the Samoyede tramped the ground systematically, and after more than an hour’s search found a
nest on one of the dry tussocky ridges intersecting the bog, containing four eggs about the size
and shape of those of the Golden Plover, but more like those of the Lapwing in colour. The
nest was a hollow, evidently scratched, perfectly round, somewhat deep, and containing a handful
of broken slender twigs and reindeer-moss. Harvie-Brown concealed himself as well as he
could behind a ridge to lay in wait for the bird returning to the nest, and after half an hour's
watching shot a veritable Grey Plover. Soon afterwards another of our men found a second
nest, also containing four eggs, in exactly a similar situation. Harvie-Brown took this nest also
in hand, and after about an hour succeeded in shooting the female. ‘The third nest was found
by the Samoyede. ‘This time I lay down behind a ridge some thirty yards from the nest, and
°
oO
after waiting a quarter of an hour caught sight of the bird on the top of a distant tussock.
Presently she ran nearer to another ridge, looked round, and then ran on to the next, until she
finally came within fifty yards of where I was lying. I had just made up my mind to risk a shot
when she must have caught sight of me, and flew right away. In a quarter of an hour I caught
sight of her again, approaching by short stages as before, but from an opposite direction. I must
have been in full sight of her. When she had approached within fifty yards of me, as near as I
could guess, I fired at her with no. 4 shot and missed. I remained reclining where I was, with
little hope that she would try a third time to approach the nest, and whiled away the time with
watching a Buffon’s Skua through my glass as it cautiously approached in my direction. Turning
my head round suddenly I caught sight of the Grey Plover running towards the nest within fifty
yards of me. I lifted my gun and fired again, but was so nervous that I missed her a second
time. I was so vexed that I got up and walked towards the Skua, which still remained én statu
quo. I missed a shot at it too, spent some time in a vain search for its nest, and returned to my
old quarters. In ten minutes I saw the Grey Plover flying up. It took a wheel in my direction,
coming almost within shot, and evidently took stock of me, and satisfied itself that I was a harm-
less animal practising with blank cartridge, and having no evil design upon its eggs. It alighted
abont fifty yards beyond the nest, and approached less timidly than before. When it came
within fifty yards of me I fired this time with no. 6 shot, and laid the poor bird upon its back.
As we returned to our boat Harvie-Brown found a fourth nest, and, after watching as before,
secured the bird. We accidentally broke two of the eggs belonging to the third nest, but reached
Alexievka at midnight with fourteen identified Grey Plover’s eggs. ‘Two sittings were quite
fresh, and made us an excellent omelette for breakfast the next morning. ‘The other two were
very slightly incubated.
“From the 25th to 28th June we made an excursion to Stanavialachta, some forty versts
lower down the river. The tundra here was more hilly, and we did not find any of the dead flat
bog which the Grey Plover frequents; consequently we did not meet with any of these birds; but
the Golden Plover was common enough, and we took two of their nests.
“On 35rd July we took advantage of a cold north-east wind, which banished the mosquitoes
for a time, to cross over to the tundra again to renew our search for Grey Plover’s eggs. We
soon heard the note of the birds we were in search of, and saw two or three, but could not dis-
cover any signs of their having a nest. After our previous experience we decided to vary our
tactics. Hitherto we had found the nests by sheer perseverance in searching, and had afterwards
watched the female to the nest and shot her. We now decided to watch the female onto the
nest in the first instance, and, having by this means found it, to secure the female afterwards as
a further and more complete identification of the eggs. It was also perfectly obvious that the
extreme care we had taken not to alarm the bird was unnecessary. Our little manceuvre of
walking away from the nest in a body, leaving one behind lying flat on the ground to watch,
under the impression that the bird could not count beyond three, and would think that we had
all gone, was clearly so much artifice wasted. The birds were evidently determined to come
back to their nests in spite of our presence; nor was there any cover to hide us if the contrary
had been the case. Our care not to handle the eggs until we had secured the bird was also of
no.use, as we often proved afterwards. On a marshy piece of ground I shot a Reeve; and then
4
467
468
4
we struck across a very likely piece of land, little flat pieces of bog with mossy ridges between.
Presently Harvie-Brown, who was in front, whistled; and as I was coming up to him I saw a
Grey Plover to my left. He called out to me that he had put up a pair near where he was
standing. I soon caught sight of another bird, on the ground, lifting its wings as if to attract me
from its nest. It then quietly ran off; and I went to the spot—but finding nothing, lay down to
watch. Harvie-Brown did the same about eighty yards off. It was not long before I caught
sight of both birds at some distance. One, which I at once concluded must be the male,
remained in one spot; the other was running towards me, stopping on some elevation every few
yards to look round. By-and-by it flew between Harvie-Brown and me, and alighted on the
other side of me. ‘The other bird soon followed, and remained as before, apparently watching
the movements of the restless bird, which I now felt sure must be the female. ‘To this latter
bird I now confined my attention, and kept it within the field of my telescope for more than half
an hour. It was never still for more than a minute together; it kept running along the ground
for a few yards, then ascending one of the ridges, looking round and uttering its somewhat
melancholy cry. It crossed and recrossed the same ridges over and over again, and finally
disappeared behind a knoll about forty yards ahead of me, and was silent. I carefully adjusted
my telescope on a knoll to bear upon the place in case I lost it, and was just making up my
mind to walk to the spot when I again heard its cry, and saw it running as before. ‘The male
was still im statu quo. The crossing and recrossing the ridge upon which my telescope was
pointed then continued for another quarter of an hour, and at last the bird disappeared behind
the same ridge as before. I gave her a quarter of an hour's grace, during which she was per-
fectly silent, and then sat up to see if Harvie-Brown was satisfied that she was on the nest. His
point of sight was not so favourable as mine; and thinking I had given up the watch as hopeless,
he fired off his gun as a last resource, and came up to me. As soon as he fired, both birds rose
almost exactly in front of the knoll upon which my telescope pointed. Upon his arrival to learn
what I had made out, I told him the nest was forty or fifty yards in front of my telescope. We
fixed one of our guns pointing in the same direction, so that we could easily see it. We then
skirted the intervening bog, got our exact bearings from the gun, and commenced a search. In
less than a minute we found the nest with four eggs. As before, it was in a depression on a
ridge between two little lakes of black bog. In returning to our boat we crossed a higher part
of the tundra near the river-bank, and saw some Golden Plovers. ‘The eggs in this, our fifth
nest, were considerably incubated, which was probably the reason why one of the birds showed
more anxiety to lure us away.
“The following day we crossed over again to the tundra, and spent some hours watching
some Buffon’s and Richardson’s Skuas. We watched one of the latter birds onto her nest, with
two eggs, and then turned our attention to the Grey-Plover ground. We found one of our men
trying to watch one of these birds onto the nest. We lay down, one fifty yards to his right, and
the other as much to his left. The birds behaved exactly as those we watched the day before.
After the female had crossed and recrossed one hillock many times, and finally disappeared
behind it, I made up my mind that the nest was there, and sat up. My sudden appearance
alarmed the male, who flew up, showing his black axillaries very distinctly in the evening sun-
shine as he skimmed over my head. We then all three rose, and in less than a minute met at
5
the nest, which contained three eggs. Isat down to pack the eggs; and Harvie-Brown followed
the male, who came up as we found the nest. Whilst I was packing the eggs and warming my
hands, and talking pigeon-Russ with the man, the female came within range, and I took up my
gun and shot her.
“Our seventh and eighth nests of the Grey Plover we took on the 9th of July. We set sail
at noon, with a north-east wind, to visit the tundra eight or ten versts higher up the great river.
For some distance before we landed the coast was very flat, with willows down to the water’s
edge. Amongst these dwarf trees we repeatedly heard the Petchora Pipit (Anthus seebohmi) and
the Siberian Chiffchaff (Phylloscopus tristis). As soon as we got beyond the willows we landed
on the tundra, and started in pursuit of a large flock of Buffon’s Skuas, but were soon stopped
by a pair of Grey Plovers, which showed by their actions that we were near the nest. We lay
down as before, forty or fifty yards apart, and watched the birds. They ran about, up and down,
and all round us; and at the end of half an hour we were no wiser than at first. ‘There was
evidently something wrong. Harvie-Brown then shouted to me, ‘ Have you marked the nest?’
I replied by walking up to him and comparing notes. We then watched together for another
half-hour with exactly the same result. I suggested that we must be so near the nest that the
bird dare not come on, and advised that we should retreat to the next ridge, which we accord-
ingly did. We had not done so many minutes before the female made her way onto the ridge
where we had been lying. She then ran along the top of the ridge, passed the place where we
had been stationed, and came down the ridge onto the flat bog towards where we then were.
I whispered, ‘She is actually crossing over to us.’ Suddenly she stopped, lifted her wings and
settled down on the ground. We both whispered, almost in the same breath, ‘She is on the
nest.’ I added, ‘I saw her lift her wings as she settled onto the eggs.’ Harvie-Brown replied,
‘So did I, and added, ‘I can’t hold out any longer against the mosquitoes.’ I replied, ‘I am
perfectly satisfied; she is within range, take her.’ Harvie-Brown lifted his gun to his shoulder.
She ran off the nest to the top of the ridge and stood there until Harvie-Brown tumbled her
over. We then walked up to the nest, the first we had seen on the flat. The eges were quite
fresh, or nearly so; and the nest must have been made nearly a fortnight later than those we had
previously taken. During that time the bogs had become much dryer, so that we could cross
them without much difficulty; and this would probably be the reason why this nest was placed
lower down. The eggs had all the appearance of a second laying, being less blotched than usual,
one of them remarkably so. It is worth noticing that whilst we were watchiug in our first
position, very near the nest, the birds were almost quite silent, and did not call to each other as
they usually do.
““ After carefully packing the eggs, we walked on, and speedily started another pair. This
time we lay down together, as near as we could tell, on the spot from which the birds rose,
which seems to be generally from forty to fifty yards from the nest. The clouds of mosquitoes
formed such a mist on the tundra that we had some difficulty in marking our birds; but by
raking the horizon with a binocular, and getting well stung through our veils in the process, we
soon found the female, and watched her onto a ridge just opposite to us. She soon settled down;
and within a quarter of an hour after we had lain down we were both perfectly satisfied that she
was on the nest. We gave her a few minutes’ grace, and then walked up to the nest, without
4n2
469
470
6
making any effort to shoot the bird, having perfectly identified her, and being almost tired out
by the mosquitoes. The eggs in this nest were considerably incubated. The nest was placed, as
before, in a hollow on a ridge. ‘The ground on this ridge was not so mossy as usual, and there
was much bare brown turf to be seen. Whether this had any thing to do with the colour of the
eggs it is difficult to say; but the fact is that these eggs are quite brown in ground-colour.
“Our ninth nest of the Grey Plover we took on the 12th of July. A stiff warm gale from the
east, with occasionally a smart shower of rain, kept the air clear of mosquitoes in the morning.
In the afternoon the wind fell, and the mosquitoes were as bad as ever; but we were too busy to
heed them much. At eleven we crossed to the tundra. We soon came upon a pair of Grey
Plovers, which rose a couple of hundred yards ahead of us, their wings glittering in a gleam of
sunshine after a smart shower. These birds have frequently a very curious flight as they rise
from the nest, tossing their wings up in the air, reminding one somewhat of the actions of a
Tumbler Pigeon. We lay down, as near as we could tell, near the spot from which they rose,
and were somewhat puzzled at their behaviour. ‘The male seemed as much, if not more anxious
than the female, running about as much as she did, continually crying, and often coming very
near us, and trying to attract our attention by pretending to be lame. ‘The female rarely uttered
a note. We suppose this must have been because one of us was too near the nest. Harvie-
Brown moved his post of observation after we had spent some time without being able to discover
any thing; and then the female behaved as usual, and I soon marked the position of the nest.
We walked straight up to it, and found the four eggs chipped ready for hatching. We had
no difficulty in shooting both birds, and afterwards hatched out two of the eggs, obtaining a
couple of good specimens of young in down. With a little practice this mode of finding birds’
nests becomes almost a certainty. One has first to be quite sure which is the male and which
the female. When the birds are near enough, and one can compare them together, the greater
blackness of the breast of the male is sufficient to distinguish him; but we found that the
females varied considerably in this respect, and that it was better to notice the habits of the
birds. The female generally comes first to the nest, but she comes less conspicuously. She
generally makes her appearance at a considerable distance, on some ridge of mossy land. When
she has looked round, she runs quickly to the next ridge and looks round again, generally calling
to the male with a single note. The male seldom replies; but when he does so it is generally
with a double note. When the female has stopped and looked round many times, then the male
thinks it worth while to move; but more often than not he joins the female by flying up to her.
The female very seldom takes wing. She is very cautious, and, if she is not satisfied that all is
safe, will pass and repass the nest several times before she finally settles upon it. The female
rarely remains upon one post of observation long; but the male often remains for ten minutes or
more upon one tussock of a ridge, watching the movements of the female.
“We walked some distance before we came upon a second pair; but at length we heard the
well-known cry, and got into position. We spent nearly two hours over this nest, and were
quite at sea at the end of the time. We changed our position several times, but to no purpose.
The female went here and there and everywhere, as much as to say, ‘ I’m not going onto the nest
as long as you are so near. At last the mosquitoes fairly tired us out, and we gave up the
watching game and commenced a search. At last we found out the secret of the bird’s behaviour.
7
We picked up some broken egg-shells, and concluded at once that the bird had young. We
tried to find them, but in vain. These two hours, however, were not wasted. The birds came
nearer to. me than they had ever done before. I often watched them at a distance of not more
than ten yards, and was able to hear their notes more distinctly. The note most frequently used
is a single plaintive whistle, 6p, long drawn out, the 6 pronounced as in German, and the con-
sonants scarcely sounded. This I am almost sure is the alarm-note. It is principally uttered
by the female when she stops and looks round and sees something that she disapproves of. If
the male shows any anxiety about the nest, which he seems to do more and more as incubation
progresses, he also utters the same note. The double note, kl-ee or kleep, the kl dwelt upon so
as to give it the value of a separate syllable, is also uttered by both birds. It is evidently their
call-note. I have seen the female, when she has been running away from the male, turn sharp
round and look towards him when he has uttered this note, exactly as any one might do who
heard his name called. Whilst we were watching this pair of birds a couple of other Grey
Plovers came up, and called as they flew past. The male answered the call and flew towards
them. On the wing this whistle is lengthened out to three notes. JI had some difficulty in
catching this note exactly. It is not so often uttered as the two others I have mentioned, and
is generally heard when you least expect it; but Iam almost sure it is a combination of the
alarm-note with the call-note—sl-ce-kip. If I wanted to make a free translation from Ploverski
into English, I should say that kl-ee means ‘ Hallo! old fellow,’ and 4ép means ‘ Mind what you
are about.’
“ We procured our tenth nest of the Grey Plover the same afternoon. It was found by our
Samoyede, who brought us three eggs and male and female shot at the nest. He accidentally
broke the fourth egg. As it contained a live young bird, we placed these three eggs in our
hatching-basket, where we had made a snug nest of Bean-Goose-down.
“‘ By this time we were pretty well tired with tramping the tundra. The ceaseless perse-
cution of the mosquitoes, and the stifling feeling caused by having to wear a veil with the
thermometer above summer heat, had taxed our powers of endurance almost to the utmost; and
we turned our faces resolutely towards our boat; but a most anxious pair of Grey Plovers were
too great an attraction to us to be resisted. We watched them for some time, during which a pair
of Ringed Dotterels persisted in obtruding themselves impertinently between us and the objects
of our attention. This pair of Grey Plovers also puzzled us; and we concluded that they possibly
had young, and consequently we gave up the search. We had each marked a place where we
thought the nest might be; and we each of us went to satisfy ourselves that it was not there.
The two places were about fifty yards apart. The birds first went up to Harvie-Brown and tried
to attract him away by flying about and feigning lameness. Then they came to me and did the
same. ‘They were so demonstrative that I felt perfectly certain of finding the nest, and shot at
the female. She dropped in the middle of a wet bog. I then shot the male, walked up to him,
and left him with my basket and gun to struggle through the bog to pick up the female.
Before I got up to her, I saw her lying on the turf on her breast with her wings slightly
expanded. I was just preparing to stoop to pick her up, when she rose and flew away, appa-
rently unhurt. I must have missed her altogether, as she was evidently only shamming to draw
me away. I returned to search for the nest, and was unable to find it. Whilst I was looking
471
Ny
8
for it Harvie-Brown came up, and I gave up the search, and we again turned towards the boat.
When we had got about halfway towards the spot where Harvie-Brown had been looking, I
caught sight of a young Grey Plover in down, almost at my feet. Stooping down to pick it up,
I saw the nest with three eggs not a yard from me. ‘This was the last and eleventh nest of these
rare birds which we found. The young in down are very yellow, speckled with black, and are
admirably adapted for concealment upon the yellow-green moss on the edges of the little bogs
close to which the Grey Plover seems always to choose a place for its nest.
“Our attempt to hatch the highly incubated eggs, and thus obtain specimens of young in
down, was successful. We soon had five young Grey Plovers well and hearty, and saved three or
four more afterwards.
‘We subsequently spent a week at Dvoinik, a hundred miles lower down the Petchora, on
the shores of the lagoon. Here we found the Grey Plover even more abundant than on the
tundra opposite Alexievka. It frequented exactly the same description of ground. Our inter-
preter shot a Grey Plover from the nest, and brought us four young in down from it, evidently
just hatched. This was on the 22nd of July; and two days later I caught a young Grey Plover
in down, somewhat older and greyer in colour.”
Mr. Seebohm has kindly sent me a specimen of the young in down of the present species,
which I have figured together with the young of the Golden Plover for comparison. Although
in this plumage the two species resemble each other much, yet the Grey Plover may be distin-
guished by its being rather less marked with yellow, especially on the back, where the markings
are paler and bolder; the hind neck is marked with white; and the underparts are whiter than
in the Golden Plover.
The rich series of eggs obtained by Messrs. Harvie-Brown and Seebohm, are described by
the latter as being “‘ intermediate in colour between those of the Golden Plover and the Peewit,
and subject to variation, some being much browner, and others more olive, none quite as green
as typical Peewit’s eggs, or as orange as typical ones of the Golden Plover; but the blotching is
in every respect the same, the underlying spots equally indistinct, the surface-spots generally
large, especially at the larger end, but occasionally very small and scattered. In size they vary
from 138 by 144 inch to 28, by 148 inch.”
Genus AAGIALITIS.
Pluvialis apud Brisson, Orn. v. p. 60 (1760).
Charadrius apud Linneus, Syst. Nat. p. 253 (1766).
Aigialitis, Boie, Isis, 1822, p. 558.
Miaticula apud G. R. Gray, List of Gen. of B. p. 65 (1840).
Ochthodromus apud Reichenbach, Natiirl. Syst. p. xviii (1851).
Cirrepidesmus apud Bonaparte, Compt. Rend. xliii. p. 417 (1856).
Morinellus apud Bonaparte, ut supra.
Aigialophilus apud Gould, Hand. B. bof Austral. ii. p. 254 (1865).
Tue Ring-Plovers inhabit the Palearctic, Ethiopian, Oriental, Australian, Nearctic, and Neo-
tropical Regions, five species being found in the Western Palearctic Region. They are, as a
rule, inhabitants of shingly and sandy places, either on the sea-coast or on the shores of lakes
and streams; and the red-breasted species frequent the large open steppes. ‘They feed on insects,
worms, small shell-fish, &c., and pick up their food either on the shores or else further inland ;
I have often found them in large flocks feeding on large mud-flats on the coast. They run
with great swiftness and ease, keeping the body very steady, and taking incredibly quick steps;
and they fly quickly and well, their flight being even and steady. Their note is clear and loud,
and is not unfrequently modulated so as to be quite melodious. Their nest is a mere depression
in the ground; and they deposit four eggs, which are dull ochreous or stone-buff, spotted and
blotched with blackish brown.
Aiigialitis hiaticula, the type of the genus, has the bill much shorter than the head, rather
slight, as broad as high, straight to the end of the nasal depression, then slightly raised, and
decurved to the tip, which is narrow but rather obtuse; nasal groove extending beyond the
centre of the bill; nostrils small, linear, subbasal; wings long, pointed, the first quill longest,
the inner secondaries nearly as long as the primaries; tail rather broad, moderately long, nearly
even, the two centre feathers rather elongated and pointed; legs moderately long, slender, the
tibia bare for a short distance; tarsus covered with hexagonal scales; hind toe wanting, the
anterior toes moderately long, slender, slightly webbed at the base; claws short, compressed,
slightly curved, rather obtuse.
186
473
¥
ard ‘eee
eae: ple ae
ly pie Ue idee
pee iH ay
PE Fotki ks
VEU eats pee
520
| AGIALITIS ASIATICA
2.AGIALITIS GEOFFROY!].
IN WINTER PLUMAGE.
O21
Hanhart imp
GREATER SAND-PLOVER.
ALGIALITIS GEOFFROY!.
AGIALITIS GEOFFROYI
(GREATER SAND-PLOVER.)
Charadrius asiaticus, Horsf. Trans. Linn. Soc. xiii. p. 187 (1820, nec Pall.).
Charadrius geoffroyi, Wagl. Syst. Av. fol. 4, p. 13. no. 19 (1827).
Charadrius leschenaultii, Less. Man. d’Orn. ii. p. 322 (1828).
“Charadrius columbinus, Hempr. & Ehr. in Mus. Berol.,” Wagl. Isis, 1829, p. 650.
Charadrius griseus, Less. Traité d’Orn. p. 544 (1831, nec Lath.).
Charadrius rufinus, Blyth, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xii. p. 169 (1843).
Hiaticula geoffroyi (Wagl.), Riipp. Syst. Uebers. p. 118 (1845).
Charadrius fuscus, Cuvier, fide Pucheran, Rev. Zool. 1851, p. 282.
Miaticula columbina (Wagl.), Licht. Nomencl. Av. p. 94 (1854).
Cirrepidesmus geoffroyi (Wagl.), Bp. Compt. Rend. xliii. p. 417 (1856).
Aigialites geoffroyi (Wagl.), Heugl. Syst. Uebers. Vog. N.O.-Afr. p. 56 (1856).
Aigialites leschenaulti (Less.), Swinh. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1863, p. 309.
Ochthodromus columboides, Reichenb., fide Harting, Ibis, 1870, p. 379.
Figure notabiles.
Savigny, Ois. de lEgypte, pl. 14. fig. 1; Kittl. Kupfert. 34. fig. 2; Harting, Ibis, 1870,
pl. xi.
3 ad. ptil. est. fronte alba, pileo et nucha sordidé rufescentibus, stridé frontali nigré: corpore supra sordidé
arenaceo-fusco: rectricibus externis albis, reliquis fusco-cinereis albo apicatis: remigibus nigricantibus,
rhachibus albis, primariis intimis in pogonio externo fere ad apicem albis, secundariis albo marginatis :
stria nigra a rostro per oculum ductaé: pectore pallidé ferrugineo: guld, gutture et corpore reliquo subtus
cum axillaribus et subalaribus albis: rostro nigricante: iride fusca: pedibus plumbeo-cinereis.
2 ad. ptil. est. mari similis, sed sordidior: capite haud nigro notato, sed lateraliter fusco-cinmereo: pectore
ferrugineo, sed pallidiore.
Ad. ptil. hiem. pileo, nuchaé et corpore supra fusco-cinereis: alis et cauda sicut in ptilosi exstivali picturatis :
capitis lateribus pallidé fusco-cinereis: fronte, loris, gula et corpore subtus albis: pectore pallidé
rufescente cervino lavato.
Adult Male in summer (Syria, 30th April). Forehead white; a black band passing over the fore part of the
crown; rest of the crown and nape brown and pale rusty reddish; upper parts generally dull sandy
brown, marked here and there with pale rufous or rusty orange on the back, outer rectrices white, the
remainder ashy brownish grey, tipped narrowly with white; quills blackish, the shafts white, some of
the inner primaries white on the outer web nearly to the tip; the short secondaries narrowly margined
with white ; a broad black streak passes from the base of the bill through the eye, covering the ear-
coverts ; a broad rusty-red band crosses the breast, and the upper flanks are tinged with this colour ;
chin, throat, and rest of the underparts white; axillaries and under wing-coverts white; bill blackish ;
~
=
Ned
476
2
iris dark brown; legs plumbeous grey. Total length about 8 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 5:7, tail 2°4,
tarsus 1°5.
Adult Female in summer (Syria). Differs from the male in lacking the black stripes over the fore crown and
through the eye, these parts being brownish grey ; the breast is paler rufous, and the upper parts are
rather darker and duller.
Adult Male in winter (Egypt). Crown, nape, and upper parts generally brownish cinereous ; wings and
tail as in the summer; sides of the head, including a space below the eye, pale brownish cinereous ;
forehead, lores, chin, throat, and underparts white, the breast tinged with pale rusty buff.
THE present species, again, is one that straggles into the Western Palearctic Region from Asia,
which is its true home. It is only found in the extreme eastern portion of the region embraced
in the present work, as it has been met with in Syria and Palestine, but does not appear to have
ever straggled into Central Europe. I possess examples from Syria; and an examination of the
specimens collected by Canon Tristram in Palestine shows that all he obtained there, even those
recorded by him as Aigialitis mongolica and Aigialitis asiatica, are referable to the present species.
The small race of the present species (gialitis mongolica, Pall.), which differs only in size and
in having a smaller bill, and which is only just specifically separable, is said by Temminck to
have once occurred near St. Petersburg; but it appears to me not improbable that the specimen,
if one was really obtained there, may prove to belong to 4. geoffroyi.
In North-east Africa the Larger Sand-Plover is found but sparingly. Von Heuglin says that
he met with it now and again in winter on the north coasts of Egypt; but, he adds, it is quite
common on the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden,—where it is doubtless a resident; for he met with
it there from June to November. He says that it frequents sandbanks, coral reefs, and low
shores, singly and in flocks, sometimes in company with other Waders, young birds being most
frequently seen, and old males in full plumage being comparatively rare. As a rule it is a shy
and a less sprightly bird than its allies; and, like them, it feeds on worms, spawn, small insects,
&c. &c.; and its note is a clear flute-like whistle. It is found in places where the water is shallow
and near the surf, and will wade into the water in search of food. When pursued they will run a
short distance and then start off on the wing, flying low and close together, but swiftly, usually
settling again at some distance. When wounded it swims with ease. He adds that he is not
sure if it breeds on the shores of the Red Sea. Captain Shelley writes (B. of Egypt, p. 238) as
follows :—“ Although I only know of two specimens of this bird having been brought back from
Egypt, one in Mr, E. C. Taylor’s collection and one in my own, I do not look upon it as of rare
occurrence in that country; but it is doubtless absent from most Egyptian collections on account
of its habit of frequenting the sandy shores of the lakes near the sea, which are rarely visited by
Nile tourists. I saw a flock of twenty of these birds on Lake Mareotis when I obtained my
specimen, in the beginning of February ; and towards the end of March, near Damietta, I again
saw considerable numbers of a Plover, which was probably this bird; but, owing to its shyness, I
was unable to procure a shot.” I do not find it recorded from West Africa, except from
Benguela; but it has been obtained as far south as the Cape colony; for Mr. Layard writes (B. of
S. Afr, p. 299) as follows :—“I shot a single specimen (?) of this Plover on the Salt River, near
3
Cape-town, in 1858, since which time no other specimen has occurred to me. On comparing it
with Indian specimens received from my friend Mr. Blyth, Curator of the Asiatic Society’s
Museum in Calcutta, not the slightest differences can be observed. My bird was accidentally
killed from a flock of Sandpipers (Charadride et Tringe) feeding in the marsh.” It has been
obtained in Mozambique and at Zanzibar; and Mr. E. Newton, who obtained it in Madagascar,
writes (Ibis, 1863, p. 455) as follows:—“ On the 9th September, one specimen from a flock of
about a dozen was killed by Mr. Maule on the sands between the village of Hivondrona and the
mouth of the river of the same name.”
In Asia it is found right across the continent to Japan. Mr. C. W. Wyatt found it in large
flocks near Tor, in the peninsula of Sinai. It is not recorded from Turkestan by Dr. Severtzoff;
but it is common in India. Mr. Hume (Stray Feathers, i. p. 229) says that he “met with it in
thousands in the Kurrachee harbour, feeding along with its congeners, Godwits, Oystercatchers,
Turnstones, and the like, on every mud-flat. It was equally common, I was told, about the
mouths of the Indus, from which locality I saw a specimen, and in all suitable localities along
the coast. With one exception, all the very numerous specimens I obtained were in winter
plumage; but one male, shot on the 2nd February, has the broad rufous pectoral patch, rufous
forehead, rufous collar round the back of the neck, and rufous tinge on many of the scapulars,
indicative of the breeding-plumage.” According to Dr. Jerdon (B. of India, ii. p. 639), it is
“chiefly found near the sea-coast, and at the mouths of large rivers, in considerable flocks. It is
found over all India in suitable spots, retiring north in April and May to breed; and it is often
brought to the Calcutta market for sale, but not in such numbers as the next species. I have
procured it on the east coast of Madras, and elsewhere, but never far inland. Blyth remarks
that it is not till May that birds in summer plumage are procurable at Calcutta; and I never got
them in the south of India in that garb. It probably occurs throughout Eastern Asia.” It is
found in Southern India, and also in Ceylon and the Andaman Islands. Captain Legge says (Ibis,
1875, p. 400), in his notes on the avifauna of Ceylon, “I found it at Hambantotta during the
south-west monsoon in June and July. They were numerous on the great sand hills near that
town, and consorted with small flocks of Glareola lactea. It is rare on the north-east coast, as in
a tour up towards Jaffna, from Trincomalie, I met with but one example, my first (published in
‘Stray Feathers,’ vol.i. p. 489). Those met with at Hambantotta, out of season, and which were
in winter dress, were probably all young birds, which, like the following species, remain to some
extent behind for the first year on the south-east and east coasts.” Mr. A. O. Hume, in his
notes on the Birds of the. Bay of Bengal, writes (Stray Feathers, ii. p. 288) as follows :—‘* We
obtained this species in the neighbourhood of Port Blair, at Macpherson’s Straits, Camorta, and
Montschall, and saw it at several other places; but it was nowhere numerous. A specimen killed
on the 8th March had begun to assume the rufous breeding-plumage; but others killed on the
25th April showed as yet no signs of this. It is almost needless to say that the specimens we
obtained in the islands were entirely identical with birds procured in Sindh and other parts of
India. Davison says:—‘ This Plover occurs, though somewhat sparingly, both at the Andamans
and Nicobars. I am unable to say when they leave for their breeding-haunts ; but they were with
Aigialitis mongolica, Tringa minuta, Strepsilas interpres, and a host of others to be seen about
Port Blair a few days before I left the islands in the middle of May.’ We obtained specimens
477
478
4
throughout the cold season; and other specimens were sent us, procured in the first week in
September.” In his notes on the Laccadives and west coast, he adds (Stray Feathers, iv. p. 463),
“It was not very uncommon at the islands. We saw, I suppose, a dozen at Cardamum and
Kittan, and, I believe, saw, but failed to shoot, it at one other island.”
Passing north again, I find it recorded from many parts of Eastern Asia: but it does not
appear to range far north; for the Siberian explorers do not include it. It was not obtained by
Dr. Henderson on his expedition to Yarkand; for he only includes #yialitis mongolica in his
ornithological notes. It is found in China, though not included by Colonel Prjevalsky in his
list of birds occurring in Chinese Mongolia; and Mr. Whitely has obtained it in Japan.
Mr. Swinhoe says that he obtained it at Amoy, and has seen it from Hongkong; and on the
shores of Formosa it was abundant, and it appears probable that it breeds there. From here it
ranges southward to Australia. Cuming records it from the Philippines; and M. Godeffroy has
received it from the Pelew Islands. It has been obtained in Java, Borneo, and Sumatra; and
Lord Tweeddale received it (Ibis, 1877, p. 322) from Lampong, in South-east Sumatra; Hoedt
records it from Ceram, Foster from Amboyna, Bernstein from Halmahera, Batchian, 'Ternate,
and Morotai, Wallace from the Aru Islands, Solomon Miiller from New Guinea; and Mr. Harting
states (Ibis, 1870, p. 383) that he has seen skins in winter plumage from Cape York, in the
collection of Mr. Gould.
So far as I can ascertain, nothing definite is known respecting the breeding-habits of the
present species ; and its eggs are unknown. In habits it is said to assimilate tolerably closely
to the Ring-Plover; but I find, comparatively speaking, but little on record respecting its general
habits beyond what I have given above.
Besides the present species there is in Asia another very closely allied one (4 gialitis
mongolica), which differs only in size, being much smaller, and especially in having a smaller
bill and shorter tarsus. A specimen, in full summer plumage, in my collection, from Swatow,
in China, measures—culmen 0°75, wing 5:28, tail 2°2, tarsus 1:2.
The specimens figured are the adult pair above described, in full summer dress, and on the
second Plate, together with 4gialitis asiatica, in winter dress, the present species is also figured
in the same stage of plumage.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,9,6,2. Nahr el Kebir, Syria, May 16th, 1877 (W. Schliiter). c,d. Nahr el Kebir, April 30th
(W. Schliter).
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a, 2. Syr Darya, Turkestan, January 1858. 6, 2. Plain of Acre, December 9th, 1863. c. Beersheba,
February 1864. d, 2. Brook Kishon, Palestine, March 19th, 1864 (H. B. T.).
O22
CASPIAN PLOVER
ALCIALITIS ASIATICA
AGIALITIS ASIATICA.
(CASPIAN PLOVER.)
Charadrius asiaticus, Pall. Reise Russ. ii. p. 715 (1773).
Charadrius caspius, Pallas, Zoogr. Rosso-As. ii. p. 136, tab. lviti (1811).
Charadrius jugularis, Wagl. Syst. Av. fol. 5, p. 5. no. 39 (1827).
Eudromias asiaticus (Pall.), Keys. & Blas. Wirbelth. Eur. p 70 (1840).
Charadrius damarensis, Strickl. Contrib. Orn. 1851, p. 148.
Charadrius gigas, L. Brehm, Naumannia, 1856, v. p. 289.
Eudromias asiatica (Pall.), C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 281 (1855
Aigialitis gigas, C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 283 (1855).
Morinellus caspius (Pall.), Bp. Compt. Rend. xliii. p. 417 (1856).
Morinellus caspius (Pall.), Bp. Cat. Parzud. p. 14 (1856).
Morinellus asiaticus (Pall.), Degl. & Gerbe, Orn. Eur. ii. p. 1382 (1867).
Figure notabiles.
Pall. Zoogr. Rosso-As. tab. lviii.; Naum. Vog. Deutschl. taf. 386. figs. 1, 2; Harting, Ibis,
1870, pl. v.
3 ad. ptil. est. supra fuscus, plumis nonnullis in dorso et nucha ochraceo-fusco apicatis, scapularibus ochraceo
marginatis: remigibus nigro-fuscis: cauda saturaté fusca, rectricibus fere omnibus albo apicatis: fronte,
stria magna superciliari, loris et regione suboculari, mento et guld albis: gutture imo et pectore ferru-
gineis, in parte ima nigro marginatis: corpore reliquo subtus et axillaribus albis: rostro nigricante ;
pedibus ochraceis : inide fusca.
2 ad. ptil. est. mari similis, sed pallidior, nec pectore et gutture imo ferrugineis, sed griseo-fuscis vix rufescenti
tinctis.
Ad. ptil. hiem. femine similis, sed pectore pallidiore et grisescentiore.
Juv. corpore supra sicut in ptilosi hiemali picturato, sed plumis ochraceo-cervino vel albo-cervino marginatis,
fronte et strié superciliari cervino lavatis, pectore pallidé griseo-cervino.
Pull. pileo et corpore supra cervino-albis vix rufescenti-cervino lavatis et nigro marmoratis: fronte, capitis
lateribus et corpore subtus albis.
Adult Male in summer (Kirghis steppes, June). Upper parts generally hair-brown, a few of the feathers on
the back and nape tipped with ochreous brown; scapulars margined with ochreous; quills blackish
brown ; tail dark hair-brown, most of the feathers tipped with white; forehead, a broad streak over the
eye, sides of the head before and below the eye, chin, and throat pure white; lower throat and upper
breast rich rust-red, forming a broad pectoral band, bordered below with black; rest of the underparts
and axillaries pure white; bill blackish; legs ochreous yellow; iris dark yellow. ‘Total length about
7°5 inches, culmen 1:0, wing 5:62, tail 2:1, tarsus 1°6.
Adult Female in summer (Kirghis steppes, June). Differs from the male in being rather paler in colour, in
3Q
479
480
2
lacking the rufous pectoral band, this part being greyish brown, slightly tinged with reddish; and the
white on the head and throat covers a rather smaller area.
Adult in winter (Transvaal). Resembles the female in summer; but the pectoral band is much paler and
greyer, and gradually merges into the white above and below.
Young of the year (Kirghis steppes, 2nd July). Upper parts as in the winter dress, but all the feathers
margined with warm ochreous buff or buffy white; forehead and the superciliary stripe slightly
washed with buff; pectoral band very indistinct, and buffy grey in colour; legs (judging from the dried
skin) dark greyish, and not ochreous.
Young in down (Kirghis steppes, June). Crown and upper parts generally buffy white, slightly tinged with
rufous buff, and richly mottled with black; hind neck scarcely mottled; forehead, sides of the head,
and entire underparts white.
THE present species inhabits Western Asia, straggling rarely into the Western Palearctic Region ;
and in the winter season it is found in Africa as far south as the Cape of Good Hope. It has
occurred twice on Heligoland—a young bird in November 1850, and an adult male in full
summer plumage on the 19th May 1859, both specimens being still in the well-known collection
of Mr. Gatke, where they were lately examined and identified by Mr. Seebohm as belonging to
the present species. According to Professor yon Nordmann a single example was procured near
Odessa in April 1836; and it has been recorded from Palestine by Canon Tristram: but this
latter statement is evidently an error; for this gentleman’s specimens have been sent to me for
examination, and there is certainly not a single one of the present species amongst them; but as
it is so very common near the Caspian, it may not improbably straggle into Palestine. It is
stated by the Russian authors to occur commonly in the Kirghis steppes. Pallas records it from
the shores of the Caspian; De Filippi obtained it at Enzeli; and Dr. Severtzoff states that it
breeds throughout Turkestan. But it does not appear to range far east into Asia. It is not
recorded by any of the Siberian or Indian authors; and though Mr. Harting states (Ibis, 1870,
p- 207) that it strays into Northern China, I cannot but think that this must be an error; for
Mr. Swinhoe does not include it in his list of the birds of China published in the Proc. Zool. Soc.
May 1871; nor is it included by either Colonel Prjevalsky or MM. David and Oustalet. The
species found in Eastern Asia generally, 4yialitis vereda, Gould, P. Z. S. 1848, p. 38, which
appears to be common in China and Japan, though tolerably closely allied to the present species,
is readily distinguishable by its larger size, larger and stouter bill, longer wing, and smoke-grey
axillaries.
The present species is found in North-east Africa. Von Heuglin states (Orn. N.O.-Afr.
p- 1019) that he now and again saw small flocks in the winter on the north coast of Egypt and
in the Gulf of Suez, which he believes were composed of this species, and in the swamps of East
Kordofan, on the Lower, White, and Blue Nile; and on the shores of Lake Tana, in Abyssinia,
he met with it in April and May in full summer plumage, and in the autumn in immature dress.
Mr. Blanford also says that he shot examples at Rairo, in Habab, in August, when they were in
flocks on open grassy ground.
I do not find it recorded from North-west Africa; but Mr. C. J. Andersson records it from
Damara Land, and says (B. of Damara L. p. 271) that small flocks may at times be seen, but it
3
is very shy and never common. All the specimens he obtained were procured at Objimbinque.
Verreaux records it from Orange River, and Professor Barboza du Bocage (J. f. O. 1876, p. 295)
from Rio Bengo, Angola. Mr. E. L. Layard writes respecting this species (B. of S. Afr. p. 299)
as follows, viz.:—‘“‘ Mr. Arnot, who forwarded the only three specimens that have reached me,
writes, ‘Found together in flocks of fifteen or twenty, very far away from water. ‘hey are
scarce, and I only see them after showers of rain, which bring out small coleoptera and animal
life of that sort, on which these birds seem to feed, and get enormously fat. Procured near
Colesberg.” Mr. Ayres, who obtained it in the Transvaal, says (Ibis, 1871, p. 263), “One day
as I was trudging down to the river to have an afternoon’s fishing, I found four of these Plovers
on the open flats outside Potchefstroom. They had somewhat the appearance of Burchell’s
Courser when on the ground, but did not run so fast. They ran and then suddenly stopped,
with their bodies horizontal ready for flight, and, being much the colour of the ground, were
not easily seen. They uttered a short ‘chuck’ whilst rising. I bagged two at one shot. On
a subsequent occasion I saw two others which I did not obtain.”
I find but little on record respecting the habits of the present species, which appears to
approach much more closely to the Ring-Plovers than to the Dotterel. Mr. Harting unites it
generically with the latter; but, as I have lately ascertained, he is wrong in so doing. Hudromias
morinellus, which is the type of that genus, has a very peculiar and characteristic sternum ; and
when I exhibited the egg of the present species at a meeting of the Zoological Society in 1875 I
stated (P. Z. 8. 1875, p. 98) that I had grave doubts as to whether this bird was a true Dotterel.
After considerable trouble I have now succeeded in obtaining a skeleton of Mgialitis asiatica ;
and Professor Newton, to whom I gave it for examination and comparison, informs me that the
sternum differs greatly from that of Hudromias morinellus, and approaches closely to that of
Aigialitis hiaticula, being therefore that of a true Aigialitis.
I find but little on record respecting the habits of the present species; and until quite lately
its eggs were unknown. I was fortunate enough to procure an egg from the Kirghis steppes
through Mr. Schliiter, and have since obtained the young in down, which I have figured. The
egg is oval in shape, tapering somewhat towards one end, and measures 1:25 by 1:07 inch. It
has more the character of a Ring-Plover’s egg than that of a Dotterel, the spots being less
blotchy than in the eggs of this latter and smaller, and it is darker and more green in tinge of
ground-colour. It is warm buff with a faint greenish tinge, the spots being nearly black.
A very good figure of this Plover is given by Mr. Harting (/.¢.); but he figures it there with
lead-grey legs, which is certainly an error; and I may also remark that his specimen has the
upper parts much darker than the one I have figured and described.
The specimens figured are :—on the one Plate the adult male and female in summer dress ;
and on the second Plate, with Myialitis geoffroyi the present species in winter dress is figured.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,3,6,9, c, pull. Kirghis steppes, June. d, juv. Kirghis steppes, July 2nd, 1877 (W. Schliiter). e, f.
Transvaal (Ayres).
3Q 2
481
reson cs9? “haniity wat eae an se aA Te
asa Kd
i Digit
eee faith
ry é
>» Re
SK
aE Ws
“ine a Sy
# it ai boos
’ 1 $
ou)
T
J
GKeulemans lth
KENTISH PLOVER.
ALGIALITIS CANTIANA.
M&N-Hanhart imp
ZIG AG I EES CoAGN IEISAGNG Ae
(KENTISH PLOVER.)
‘Charadrius alexandrinus, Hasselq. It. Palest. p. 255. no. 30 (1757).
'Charadrius alevandrinus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 253 (1766, ex Hasselq.).
Charadrius cantianus, Lath. Ind. Orn. Suppl. p. 66 (1801).
Charadrius albifrons, Wolf & Meyer, Vog. Deutschl. Heft 15 (1895).
Charadrius littoralis, Bechst. Naturg. Vog. Deutschl. ed. 2, iv. p. 430 (1809).
Aigialitis cantianus (Lath.), Boie, Isis, 1822, p. 558.
Aigialitis albifrons (Meyer), C. L. Brehm, Vég. Dutschl. p. 551 (1831).
Aigialitis albiqularis, C. L. Brehm, op. cit. p. 552 (1831).
Aigialites cantianus (Lath.), Bp. Comp. List, p. 45 (1838).
Hiaticula elegans, Licht. Nomencl. Ay. p. 94 (1854).
Hiaticula cantiana (Lath.), Licht. op. cit. p. 94 (1854).
Aigialitis cantiana, C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 283 (1855).
t Aigialitis homeyeri, C. L. Brehm, op. cit. p. 283 (1855).
Aigialitis ruficeps, C. L. Brehm, op. cit. p. 283 (1855).
Aigialophilus (Aigialites cantianus, Lath.), Gould, Handb. B. of Australia, ii. p. 234 (1865).
Aigialites dealbatus, Swinhoe, P. Z.S. 1870, p. 138.
Charadrius trochilus, Cuy., fide G. R. Gray, Hand-l. iii. p. 17 (1871).
Aigialophilus cantianus (Lath.), Hume, Stray Feathers, i. p. 230 (1873).
Pluvier a collier interrompu, French; Lavadeira, Portuguese; Charran, Spanish; Fratino,
Italian; Bou-hejaira, Moorish; See-Regenpfeifer, German; Strandplevier, Dutch; Hvid-
brystet Strandpiber, Danish; Hvitbréstad Strandpipare, Swedish.
Figure notabiles.
Werner, Atlas, Cowreurs, pl. 15; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. taf. 30; Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 33. fig. 2;
Naumann, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 176; Sundevall, Svensk. Fogl. pl. 37. fig. 5; Gould, B. of
Eur. pl. 298; id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 40; Schlegel, Vog. Nederl. pl. 215; Wolf &
Meyer, J. c.
3 ad. ptil. est. fronte, strid magna superciliari, nuchd, capitis et colli lateribus et corpore subtis cum
axillaribus et subtectricibus alarum albis: fascia frontali, loris, stria per oculos et regione parotica, et
macula magna, in utroque colli latere nigris, pileo rufescenti-brunneo : corpore supra pallidé brunneo :
remigibus primariis nigro-fuscis, scapis albis, secundaris pallidioribus et albo marginatis: rectricibus
centralibus saturaté fuscis, reliquis albis: rostro et pedibus nigris : iride fusca.
2 ad. mari similis sed minus nigro notata et pileo fere dorso concolori sed vix pallidiore.
3 ptil. hiem. corpore supra saturatiore, pilei plumis sordidé brunneo marginatis, et plumis nigris in capite vix
albido marginatis.
4q@2
485
5)
=
Adult Male in summer (Constantinople, 26th April). Forehead, a broad streak over and behind the eye,
lower nape, sides of the head and neck, except as hereinafter stated, and entire underparts pure white ;
above the white on the forehead is a tolerably broad black patch; crown and occiput rich reddish
brown ; lores and a streak extending past the eye and including the ear-coverts, black, and on each side
of the upper breast, in advance of the carpal joint, is a patch of black, which is not continued across
the breast ; upper parts generally light hair-brown; primaries blackish brown, the shafts white, except
at the tip; secondaries lighter, and more or less edged with white ; central rectrices blackish brown,
the remaining tail-feathers white; axillaries and under wing-coverts white; bill and legs black; iris
dark brown. Total length about 6:5 inches, culmen 0:8, wing 3:95, tail 1°7, tarsus 1-05.
Adult Female (S. Sweden, 14th June). Differs from the male in having the black markings narrower, and
the crown and occiput coloured almost like the back, but rather paler.
Adult Male in winter (Rhodes, 5th December). Differs from the male in summer dress in having the upper
parts darker, the reddish tinge on the crown and occiput obscured by brown edges to the feathers, and
the black on the head blurred by white edges to the feathers.
Young in first autumn (Rye, Sussex, 18th September). No black on the head or sides of the breast ; crown,
nape, and sides of the head to below the eye light hair-brown with lighter edges ; forehead dusky
white; upper parts as in the adult, but the feathers have highter margins; underparts white; the
patches on the sides of the upper breast, which in the adult are black, are dull brown in the young;
legs and bill black.
Young in down (Tangier). Forehead white with a tinge of yellowish buff at the base of the bill; a black
streak through the eye to the nape, widening behind the eye; upper parts yellowish buff, variegated
with black; underparts pure white.
Obs. As in most of the small Plovers, there is a considerable individual variation in size, not only in
specimens from far distant countries, but amongst a series from the same locality. After measuring a
large series, I find that the males vary in size about as follows—culmen 0-8-0°82, wing 4:04:45,
tail 1:7-2-0, tarsus 1:05-1:12. The largest example is one from the south coast of England, and the
smallest is one from near Constantinople; but I find the next largest is a bird from Darjeeling, and one,
a mere trifle larger than the smallest bird, is from the Sussex coast. After a careful examination of
Mr. Swinhoe’s specimens of so-called . dealbata from China, I cannot distinguish any difference, at
least in the birds in a preserved state. Mr. Swinhoe informs me, however, that his 4. dealbata has
a spot at the base of the lower mandible light-coloured, and that the tarsi are of a lighter colour when
fresh killed than in 4. cantiana, both of which are, he says, found in China.
THE present species does not range as far north as the common Ringed Plover, not being met with
higher than Great Britain and Southern Scandinavia, but in Central and Southern Europe it is
not uncommon in suitable localities, and has been met with as far south as the Cape colony in
Africa. In Asia it occurs as far east as Japan; but in America it is replaced by Myialitis nivosa.
In Great Britain it is met with but very rarely, except on the south coast of England, where
perhaps a few pairs may yet breed, though it has been almost exterminated by thoughtless
gunners and egg-collectors. It has been met with on the Norfolk coast, but is rare. Mr.
Stevenson (B. of Norf. ii. p. 99) enters fully into the details of the various recorded occurrences,
and enumerates from his own notes nine instances of its having been obtained in Norfolk
9
o
between 1850 and 1867. It only visits that county during the seasons of passage, and has not
been known to breed there; and, according to Mr. Cordeaux (B. of the Humber Dist. p. 93), a
pair were shot in May 1869, near Bridlington, on the Yorkshire coast, by T. Boynton, Esq., of
Ulrome Grange. Further north than this I cannot find that it has occurred on the English
coast; and it has not been recorded from Scotland. Kent and Sussex’ are the only counties in
England where it is known to breed; and some years ago it used to be by no means very rare at
Lydd and near Rye Harbour. Mr. Cecil Smith, who informs me that he has never known it to
occur in Somersetshire, adds that in Guernsey it is tolerably common, and he killed a male and
female in that island on the 2nd July, and saw several more in Alderney about the same time ;
so that it probably breeds in both islands. In Ireland, Thompson states, it is only known
as an extremely rare visitant; and it appears that only one specimen obtained there has been
preserved.
It has not been met with in Greenland, Iceland, or the Feroes; and though it is found in
the southern districts of Sweden, it cannot, Mr. Collett informs me, be included in the avifauna
of Norway. It was stated to have been obtained on Jeederen, near Stavanger, and at Christiania ;
but the specimens have turned out to be nothing but the young of the Ringed Plover. In Sweden
it is restricted to the southern portion of the country, where it is a summer resident. Nilsson
says that it breeds in tolerably large numbers in the southern part of Skane, at Skanorsljung,
and on the sandy island Klappen. It has not been known to occur in Finland or in Northern
Russia; but Borggreve says that it occurs on the coasts of North Germany, but is not common,
and becomes less numerous towards the east, being scarcely ever met with in the interior.
It arrives at and leaves Denmark about the same time as the Ringed Plover. Kjzerbolling says
that it breeds on Sylt, Romo, Fano, Saltholm, at Aarhuus, and Ulfshale-on-Méen ; he also met
with it commonly at Nymindegab, at the entrance of the Ringkjobing fiord, at Blaavandshuk,
Les6, and Frederikshavn. On the Dutch coast it appears regularly during the seasons of
passage; and Baron von Droste Hiilshoff states that it breeds in tulerable numbers on the
island of Borkum. Some few are stated to breed on the Belgian coast, where it is common
during passage; and it is stated to be common and to breed numerously on the sandy portions
of the French coast, and in the lower portions of the Camargue. Professor Barboza du Bocage
speaks of it as occurring in Portugal, where, however, it is not common; and in Spain, Mr.
Howard Saunders informs me, it is common, and breeds all round the coast. Colonel Irby
writes also (Orn. Str. Gibr. p. 162) that it is by far the most plentiful of the sea-shore waders
on the Spanish side of the Straits, where it is found throughout the year, but is most abundant
during the seasons of migration. Mr. A. von Homeyer met with it on the Balearic Isles, where,
he says, it is particularly common on the sandy coast of Majorca.
Passing eastward, again, I find it recorded as rare and of irregular occurrence in Savoy,
where it generally appears in the autumn; but, according to Salvadori, it is rather abundant in
many parts of Italy, especially along the Adriatic coast; but it appears to be local, and, whereas
it is very common in Sardinia, it is somewhat rare in Sicily, except near Girgenti. Mr. C. A.
Wright states (Ibis, 1864, p. 141) that in 1853 Mr. Medlycott and he shot several on Fort-
Manoel Island, but that since then he has not observed it at Malta. Lord Lilford records it as
being common in Corfu and all suitable localities in Epirus during the winter months, disap-
486
4
pearing about the middle of March; and Dr. Kriiper states that it is a resident in Greece and
Asia Minor, and numbers breed on the lagoons of Missolonghi and those near Smyrna. It has
eggs late in April or early in May. Dr. Kriiper is uncertain if it remains there over the entire
winter. In Southern Germany it is of very rare, almost doubtful, occurrence; and Dr. A. Fritsch
states that its occurrence in Bohemia rests solely on one specimen in the Museum at Prague,
which is stated to have been obtained in, Bohemia. Messrs. Danford and Harvie-Brown write
(Ibis, 1875, p. 419) that it is rare in Transylvania. It is said to have been found breeding in
the country. Herr Csdto says it rarely flies over from the plains of the Maros into the valley of
the Strell. Messrs. Elwes and Buckley speak of it as being very common on the Bulgarian coast.
I have examined specimens obtained near Constantinople by Mr. Robson; and Professor von
Nordmann states that in Southern Russia it is the most abundant of the family from March to
November. As above stated, Dr. Kriiper says that it is common and resident on the coasts of
Asia Minor; and Canon Tristram writes (Ibis, 1868, p. 325) that it breeds in several places in
Palestine. In North Africa it is common; and Captain Shelley writes (B. of Egypt, p. 240) that
it is “abundant both in Egypt and Nubia, frequenting the sandy flats near water, and is appa-
rently a sociable bird, as it is always met with in flocks. Owing to the assimilation of their
plumage to the ground they frequent, they are difficult to distinguish, and their presence is often
first made known by the sudden rising of a flock from a spot in the immediate vicinity.” Von
Heuglin records it from the Nile, where, he says, it is found now and then in the winter; but he
met with it more commonly in the summer on the Red Sea, and in September and October in
the Gulf of Aden. All the authors on the ornithology of Algeria record it as common in that
portion of Africa. Mr. O. Salvin says (Ibis, 1859, p. 555) that it occurs in abundanee along the
shores of the large lagoon of El Baheira, between Tunis and La Goletta, and he found it breeding
on the borders of most of the salt lakes in the interior. Mr. J. H. Gurney, jun., met with it at
Laghouat; and Canon Tristram writes (Ibis, 1860, p. 78) as follows :—‘* One of the most univer-
sally distributed denizens of the Sahara, this species is to be found running rapidly along the
sand by all the chotts and sebkhas in parties of from two to eight. It breeds everywhere, but,
unlike our Ring-Plover, appears to lay only three eggs, which are placed on the level sand,
without the precaution of even selecting the impress of a camel’s foot.’ Favier speaks of it
(fide Irby, /. c.) as being “very abundant near Tangier, and generally found at the mouths of
rivers. Many are resident, those which are migratory arriving during September and October,
leaving northwards in March and April.” Southward it has been met with in Africa as far as
the Cape colony. Mr. Andersson says (B. of Damara L. p. 272) that it is rare in Damara Land,
where it occurs almost solely on the sea-coasts; and Mr. E. L. Layard writes (B. of S. Afr.
p. 296) that there is a specimen in the South-African Museum, which came from a collection
made by the late Mr. Villet at the Knysna. It likewise occurs in the Canaries, Madeira, and
the Azores. According to Dr. C. Bolle, it is not only a winter visitant but a resident in Canaria
in places where the coast is sandy, and certainly breeds there; and Mr. F. DuCane Godman (Nat.
Hist. Azores, p. 32) writes as follows:—‘‘I met with a few of these birds about the lakes in St.
Michael's, but afterwards found them more plentiful about Capellas, in Fayal, and on the high
ground between Angra and Praya, in Terceira. It breeds in Terceira, as I saw several young
birds about, which were unable to fly.”
5
To the eastward the present species is found as far as Japan. Mr. Blanford informs me
that it does not appear to be common on the Persian plateau, but is more so on the sea-coast and
near the Caspian. De Filippi obtained it at Sultaniah, between Tabriz and Kazvin; and Major
St. John adds that he once procured it near Yazdikhast in May. Mr. Hume says (/. ¢.) that he
met with it all along the banks of the larger rivers, both in the Punjab and Sindh, occasionally
in some of the inland waters of Sindh, and commonly in the Kurrachee harbour, and along the
Mekran coast. Dr. Jerdon speaks of it as being generally diffused in India, but preferring the
sea-coast to inland waters; and it is stated by Mr. Holdsworth and Lieut. W. V. Legge to occur
in Ceylon, the latter gentleman giving an account of its breeding there. In China it appears
to be to some extent resident, and otherwise migratory. Mr. Swinhoe describes a species (J. ¢.)
under the name of Mgialites dealbatus from that country; but after a careful examination and
comparison of that gentleman’s specimens, I cannot detect any specific character whereby they
can be distinguished from our European Kentish Plover, which is stated by him to be
common on the coasts of South China and Formosa during winter, the majority migrating
northwards in spring. Pere David says that it is less common in North China than the Lesser
Ringed Plover; and Captain Blakiston obtained it at Hakodadi, in Japan, in August. Neither
Von Schrenck nor Middendorff records it from Siberia; but Dr. G. Radde met with it at Tarei-
nor in April 1856, and obtained eight specimens; and Pallas states that it frequents the salt
lakes of Dauria. According to Messrs. Finsch and Hartlaub, it occurs in the Pelew Islands. In
America it is replaced by a closely allied species, Ayialitis nivosa, which differs in having the
lores white, and not black as in the present species, in the summer dress; and even in the imma-
ture and winter plumage there is a trace of this dark mark on the lores in the present species
and none in 4. nivosa.
In habits the present species resembles the common Ringed Plover not a little; but it is
much more of a coast-frequenting bird than that species. I used frequently to see small flocks
of Kentish Plovers when collecting on the coasts of Kent and Sussex in the autumn some years
ago. ‘They were rather tame than wild, unless they had been molested, and ran about in a
wavering manner along the shore like the Ringed Plovers, usually amongst the shingle, now and
again uttering their call-note. I have never, however, seen or taken the nest of this species, not
having had an opportunity of visiting its nesting-haunts during the breeding-season. The men
who collect eggs on the shores told me that the nest is a mere depression in the sand or shingle,
sometimes a little distance from the true shore, in sandy places, and then occasionally in a place
where it is slightly concealed, but more frequently quite in an open situation, and the eggs, four
in number, are placed with the pointed ends towards the centre. ‘The best notes on the nidifi-
cation of this bird that are known to me are those by Baron von Droste Hiilshoff, who found it
breeding numerously on the island of Borkum, and from whose work (Vogelw. Bork. pp. 154-157)
I extract the following information. The Kentish Plover is very common on Borkum during
the breeding-season, and is scattered throughout the dunes. ‘The nest is placed both in the
thickly overgrown dunes and in the large bare sandy tracts, as well as in the imner portions of
the dunes, where rushes, grass, brambles, and Ononis reptans grow thickly; and he never met
with it on the outer sands, as stated by Naumann, nor did he find the nest in an open situation,
but often in the middle of a bunch of wild oats or amidst willow-shoots, though never so care-
438°7
BN
CO
ae
Neat x
6
fully hidden as that of the Redshank. ‘The nest itself he describes as being a slight depression
in the ground, lined with a few grass bents or fine rootlets. “Often,” he writes, “‘ several pairs
breed within a very small area; I have found nests not ten paces distant from each other.
The various pairs lived in amity together, and joined in uttering their cries when I approached.
When any one approaches a nest, the male usually warns his mate by uttermg a low flute-like
note, /liiit; and I sometimes caught sight of the female running, crouched down, from her nest ;
and only when she had traversed some distance, and got behind some cover, would she rise into
the air and fly circling round, uttering a sharp but not loud pit, pit. Now and again the male
would take his turn in circling round; and when either settled down it always alighted where
some unevenness in the ground hid it from view, but would immediately run out to look at the
intruder, uttering now and again its note, fliiit. Should any one approach too close to the nest,
the bird will crawl about at a few paces distance on the ground, uttering a mournful note,
trarr, trarr, puffing out its feathers, turning its head and dragging one wing, and if pursued will
run quickly away, but will recommence its former manceuvres should one again remain standing
still. During the breeding-season the old birds seldom range far away from the nest, and one
may observe the male performing curious aérial motions, which probably represent a sort of love-
dance, like the drumming of the Snipe. It flies in a peculiar, Bat-like, wavering manner, the
wings being very fully extended, the body thrown now on the one and now on the other side;
and it almost describes a circle in its flight, uttering as it flies a peculiar note, which resembles
the syllables tri, tritritritrirrrr. ‘The young leave the nest during the first few days after they
are hatched, but do not stray far until they are about halfgrown, when they betake themselves
to the shore—and when able to fly, collect in flocks and wander about.”
Eges of the present species in my collection, from Kent, Sussex, and the Holstein coast,
have the ground-colour lighter or darker clay-ochreous, and are marked with greyish black
underlying shell-markings and clearly defined black surface-spots and scratches. ‘They differ
from the eggs of 4. hiaticula in having most of the markings irregular and scratchy, almost as.
if drawn with a pen, whereas in 4. hiaticula they are generally clearly defined roundish spots
and blotches. In size they vary from 1,8; by $8 to 133 by 3% inch.
So far as I can ascertain, the food of the present species is the same as that of the common
Ringed Plover
The specimens figured are an adult male and a female in breeding-plumage, they being those
above described.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,3. Rye Harbour, Sussex, May 1860 (E. Booth). 6, c, juv. Rye, September 13th and 18th, 1860 (H. E. D.).
d, g ad. Rye, May 1870. e, pull. Tangier, 1873 (H. L. Irby). f, ad. Sardinia, March 14th, 1869 (G. EB.
Shelley). g, 3 ad. Near Constantinople, April 26th, 1863 (Robson). h. Djeddah, Red Sea (S. S. Allen).
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a. Alps, February 1856. 6,2. Pulos, February 12th, 1858. c,@. Tuggurt, December 27th, 1856 (H. B. 7).
489
7
d,2,e,d. Riv. Kishon, March 19th, 1864 (4. B.7.). f,3,9,2. Tyre, December 1863 (H. B. T.).
h. China (Swinhoe).
E Mus. J. E. Harting.
a,?. Lydd Beach, Kent (W. Kent). 6,3,¢,¢. Rye Harbour, Sussex, May 1866 (W. Kent). d,?. Pagham
Harbour, August 1866. e. Sweden. jf, d. Seine, France (Fuirmaire). g, 3. Gibraltar, April 24th, 1872
(ZL. Irby). h, 3. Malaga, April 26th, 1869 (H. Saunders). i, 3. Rhodes, December 5th, 1874 (C. G.
Danford). j. Morocco (Boucard). k, juv. Morocco, autumn 1872 (Boucard). 1,3, m, 2. Nile, Egypt,
winter (H. Rogers). mn. Damara Land (Andersson). 0, p. Darjeeling (Colonel Sharpe). g, 2. Osenkeo,
China, November 14th, 1857 (R. Swinhoe). r,s,2,¢. Amoy, China, October 1866 (R. Swinhoe). uw.
-Amoy, China, November 1866. v. Amoy, China, December 1867. w, 2. Formosa, 1861 (R. Swinhoe).
x. Bhawulpore (Marshall).
E Mus. R. Swinhoe.
a. Hastings, Sussex, 1875. 6,3. Safich, January 28th, 1864 (H. B. Tristram). c, d, e. Amoy, China,
January 1860 (R. 8.). f. Amoy, February 1860 (R. S.). g. Amoy, March 1861 (R. S.). h, 3,4, 6.
Amoy, April 1861 (R. 8.). y,d,4,2. Amoy, May 1861 (R. S.). J, m. Amoy, June 1866 (RK. S.).
n,0,p,q,7r- Amoy, July 1866 (R. 8.). s,¢. Amoy, October 1866 (R. S.). u,v, w, x, y. Amoy, No-
vember 1866 (R. S.). z. Shanghai (A. Michie). aa, 2. Osenkeo, November 14th, 1857. ab. Talienwan,
July 1860 (R. 8S.). ac, ad, ae, af, ag. Hainan, March 1868 (R. S.). ah, ai. Formosa, March 1862
(R. 8.).
4
Dir
ee: ‘
Gnegesiy
Ter ale
i x eunvatdl ‘
ri, Hit We a
pits a tye Oe
we)
LITTLE RINGED PLOVER.
A-GIALITIS CURONICA.
M&N.Hanhart mp
491
AGIALITIS CURONICA.
(LESSER RINGED PLOVER.)
’ Petit pluvier a collier de Visle de Lugon, Sonn. Voy. Nouy. Guin. p. 84, pl. 46 (1776).
Le Petit Pluvier a collier, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. viii. p. 90, footnote (1781).
*Charadrius dubius, Scop. Del. Flor. et Faun. Insubr. p. 95 (1786).
Charadrius, sp. nov., Beseke, Schr. Berl. naturf. Gesell. vii. p. 463 (1787).
Charadrius alexandrinus, var. 6, Gm. Syst. Nat. i. p. 684 (1788).
Charadrius curonicus, Gmel. Syst. Nat. i. p. 692 (1788, ex Beseke).
Charadrius philippinus, Lath. Ind. Orn. i. p. 745 (1790).
Charadrius minor, Wolf & Meyer, Vogel Deutsch]. Heft 15 (1805).
Charadrius fluviatilis, Bechst. Gemeinn. Naturg. Deutschl. iv. p. 422 (1809).
tCharadrius hiaticula, Pall. Zoogr. Rosso-As. ii. p. 144 (1811).
Charadrius minutus, Pall. tom. cit. p. 145 (1811).
Charadrius pusillus, Horsf. Trans. Linn. Soc. xiii. p. 187 (1822).
Aigialitis minor (Meyer), Boie, Isis, 1822, p. 558.
Aigialitis fluviatilis (Bechst.), C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 549 (1831).
Aigialitis minor (Meyer), C. L. Brehm, tom. cit. (1851).
Charadrius hiaticuloides, Frankl. P. Z.S. 1851, p. 125.
Charadrius zonatus, Swains. B. of W. Afr. ii. p. 235, pl. 25 (1837).
Aigialites curonicus (Gm.), Keys. & Blas. Wirbelth. Eur. p. 71 (1840).
HMiaticula philippina (Lath.), Blyth, Cat. B. Mus. As. Soc. p. 263 (1849).
HMiaticula pusilla (Horsf.), Blyth, op. cit. p. 264 (1849).
Hiaticula curonica (Beseke), Licht. Nomencl. Ay. p. 94 (1854).
t Miaticula simplex, Licht. op. cit. p. 94 (1854).
Charadrius gracilis, L. Brehm, Naumannia, 1855, p. 288.
Charadrius pygmeus, L. Brehm, Naumannia, 1855, p. 289.
Aigialitis pygmea, C. L. Brehm, Vogelfang, p. 282 (1855).
Aigialitis gracilis, C. L. Brehm, op. cit. p. 282 (1855).
Aigialites zonatus (Swains.), Hartl. Orn. W.Afr. p. 216 (1857).
Aigialites pusillus (Horsf.), Swinh. Ibis, 1860, p. 63.
Aigialites philippinus (Lath.), Swinh. Ibis, 1861, p. 342.
Aigialitis minutus (Pall.), Jerdon, B. of India, ii. p. 641 (1863).
Pluvialis fluviatilis (Bechst.), Droste, Vogelw. Borkums, p. 153 (1869).
Petit Pluvier a collier, French; Lavadeira, Portuguese; Frailecillo, Spanish; Monakella
_ sekonda, Maltese; Fluss-Regenpfeifer, kleiner Regenpfeifer, German; kleine Plevier,
Dutch; Prostekrave, Sandevit, Tudse, Tijhit, Danish; Liden Strandryle, Norwegian ;
Mindre strandpipare, Swedish; Pieni ranta raukuja, Finnish.
2
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 921; Werner, Atlas, Cowreurs, pl. 14; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. taf. 30;
Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 33. figs. 3, 4; Naumann, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 177; Sundevall,
Svensk. Fogl. pl. 37. fig. 4; Gould, B. of Eur. pl. 297; id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 42;
Schlegel, Vog. Nederl. pl. 214.
3 ad. A. hiaticule coloribus similis sed conspicué minor, rectrice extima rhachi alba, reliquis rhachibus fuscis :
rostro nigro maculé ad basin mandibule flava: pedibus pallidé et sordidé ochraceis: iride fuscé, mar-
ginibus palpebrarum flavis.
Juv. Zig. hiaticule similis sed minor.
Adult Male (near Constantinople, 8rd June). In coloration and general distribution of colour closely
resembling Aigialitis hiaticula, but smaller in size; the shaft of the first primary alone white, those
of the rest of the quills brown; bill black, with a small yellow patch at the base of the lower mandible ;
legs dull fleshy yellow; iris deep brown, edge of the eyelid yellow. Total length about 6 inches,
culmen 0°62, wing 4°33, tail 2°3, tarsus 0°95.
Young (Secunderabad). Resembles the young of Agialitis hiaticula, but may be distinguished by its smaller
size, and by the first primary alone having a white shaft.
THE present species has a very extensive range—being found throughout Europe (except in the
high north), in Africa down as far south as the Gaboon and Mozambique, and in Asia as far
south as the Philippines and as far east as China.
With us in England it is but a rare straggler; and it is by no means easy to determine which
of the recorded occurrences really refer to the present species, and which to the small form of
Aigialitis hiaticula, which has so often done duty for the Lesser Ringed Plover. Mr. J. E.
Harting enumerates eleven instances of its occurrence in England, and adds that one of the
specimens there recorded is in his own collection; but it does not appear to have been met with
either in Scotland or Ireland. It does not occur in Greenland or Iceland ; and though Mr. H. C.
Miller records its occurrence on the Feroes, he may have mistaken a small specimen of Ay.
iiaticula for this species. It is, however, found in Norway, and breeds, Mr. Collett says, in
sandy places on the shores of the fiords in Christiania and Christiansand stifts, more sparingly
along the west coast up to the Trondhjemsfiord, where it breeds in the Surendale. In the
interior it is not uncommon on inland waters, as at Oieren, Fiskumvand, Valders, Ransfiord, and
Glommen. In Sweden, Professor Sundevall says, it does not range much above 60° N. lat. It
is found in Upland, at Gefle, in Nerike, and Southern Wermland, and south of those districts in
suitable localities. According to Dr. Palmén (Finl. Fog]. ii. p. 90) it “is only found in Southern
and Central Finland. It is common on the southern coast near Wyburg and Borga, where it
breeds; several nests were found on Nordsjéskatan, east of Helsingfors, in 1861, early in June.
It has also been found in the parish of Helsinge, and remains on the coasts as late as the end of
September. Mr. Sahlberg saw it on the Pyhajarvi Lake, and it occurs on Aland. It ranges up
into Southern Osterbotten; and Mr. Alcenius obtained the bird and eggs in Larsmo kapell. It
is found on the Ladoga, and breeds at Kexholm. J. von Wright observed it at Kuopio on the
3
spring passage, and its nest was found there early in June 1869; and in 1870 Mr. Aschan shot
one of a pair on the 14th June at Ahkionlaks canal, in Maaninka kapell.” Mr. Meves met with
it in Northern Russia; and Mr. Sabanieff says that it is generally distributed throughout Central
Russia, and is especially numerous on the Kama. It is common on the Volga, and on the larger
rivers in the Governments of Tver, Jaroslaf, and Kostroma, but is rarer in that of Moscow and in
the Ural. Throughout the countries bordering the Baltic it appears to be common, frequenting
inland waters; and Naumann speaks of it as being very generally distributed in Germany on the
inland waters where the soil is suitable, and numerous on the Elbe. It arrives early in April,
sometimes late in March, and leaves late in August or September, a few stragglers occasionally
remaining as late as October. Mr. Benzon informs me that it has certainly been known to breed
in Denmark; and Kjerbdélling states that it is by no means very uncommon in that country.
Mr. Sachse informs me that it breeds on the Rhine, but is rarely seen near Altenkirchen.
Professor Schlegel includes it in his work on the birds of Holland, though he gives no particulars
as to its occurrences in that country; but Mr. Labouchere informs me that it occurs in small
numbers on passage. In Belgium it is a tolerably regular migrant along the Meuse, and is
abundant in the marshy plains of the neighbourhood of Maestricht, and along the river-banks.
In Luxembourg it is common along the Moselle and the Sire, where it breeds ; and De la Fontaine
proves that it does not sit on its eggs throughout a great part of the day. In the northern and
central departments of France it is somewhat rare, and only a limited number breed there; but
in the south it becomes more abundant, nesting regularly along the Durance and the Verdora,
although not observed in the Camargue. Professor Barboza du Bocage speaks of it as being
common in Portugal; and Colonel Irby says (Orn. Str. Gibr. p. 161) it is abundant in Spain, but
not so numerous in winter as during the breeding-season. In the Balearic Isles it is, Von Homeyer
says, the rarest of the Plovers, but is more numerous in the interior than on the coast. In Savoy
it arrives in the spring in small flocks; and they then separate into pairs, and many breed along
the Rhone, the Isére, and in other suitable localities. They leave in August; but some remain
as late as October, at which time a second detachment passes through from other countries.
In Italy it is resident, its numbers being augmented at times of migration; and in Sicily it
is principally a visitant, although some breed in the Madorina, and probably in other districts.
Mr. C. A. Wright says (Ibis, 1864, p. 141) that it is common in Malta, arriving and departing
together with the common Ringed Plover. In southern Germany it is tolerably common, and
generally distributed; and Dr. Anton Fritsch says (J. f. O. 1871, p. 384) that it frequently
breeds on the sandy and pebbly shores of large and small rivers in Bohemia. It is common in
the vicinity of Prague, even on the Hetzinsel, and near Lieben. He also found it near Laun,
Horazdoyic, Frauenburg, &c. &c. Kablik mentions this bird as breeding near Hohenelbe. ‘The
late Mr. Seidensacher says that it breeds on the Sann, in Styria. It arrives early in April, and
leayes about the end of August. Messrs. Danford and Harvie-Brown say (Ibis, 1875, p. 419),
it is ‘common along the stony parts of rivers. We observed it at Bogat, on the Maros, and at
Hatzeg.” In Greece, Dr. Kriiper states, it inhabits the sandy banks of the rivers and the sea-
shore, and breeds in the country. He thinks it not improbable that it winters in the Cyclades.
Lord Lilford says it is tolerably common in Corfu in April and May, particularly in the Val di
Corissia and at Potamo, only remaining a few days in the island. Colonel Drummond-Hay
x
495
494
4
writes that in April he found it common in Crete, but all had left by the 15th May. Mr. Robson
says that it is pretty numerous in European and Asiatic Turkey, and a constant resident in the
country; and Dr. Finsch states that it breeds on the streams of Bulgaria quite high up the
Balkan. Professor von Nordmann speaks of it as being very common in Southern Russia,
arriving near Odessa early in March; and it appears to be tolerably common in Asia Minor.
Canon Tristram obtained it on several occasions on the Kishon, in Palestine, and he believes that
he saw it more than once on the shores of Galilee; but it is, he adds, much less numerous than
Aigialitis hiaticula. It is recorded from North-east Africa by all the travellers who have written
on the ornithology of that country. Captain Shelley says that it is resident and very abundant
throughout Egypt and Nubia. Mr. J. H. Gurney, jun., writes to me, “it is a resident, univer-
sally distributed, and very common. I imagine they generally breed by the river; but at Gebel
Silsilis a small flock had located themselves at the brink of the desert, a mile inland, at a place
resembling Thetford warren, in Norfolk, where #. hiaticula breeds inland;” but Von Heuglin
says that he only observed it in Egypt in the winter season, and that it is nowhere common in
that country. He met with it sparingly on the shores of the Red Sea, on the Nile and its
branches to the vicinity of the equator, westwards in the Req swamp. According to Loche it is
tolerably numerous in Algeria, where some few remain to breed; and Mr. O. Salvin met with it
in the neighbourhood of the marsh of Zana during the breeding-season. Mr. Drake does not
record it from Tangier; but Colonel Irby found it very common there in April on river-banks.
It occurs on the west side of Africa as far south as the Gaboon. It has been obtained at Senegal
and on the Gambia. Verreaux records it from Casamanse, Pel from the Gold Coast ; Governor
Ussher shot one at Accra; and DuChaillu obtained it on the Gaboon. On the east side of the
continent it has been recorded from South Mozambique by Dr. Peters; and there is a specimen
in the Berlin Museum from Mauritius.
To the eastward it is met with as far as China. De Filippi found it common in summer on
the sandy beds of streams in Northern Persia; and Mr. Blanford believes that he saw it on the
borders of the lake at Shiraz in June. It is generally distributed in India, being found,
Dr. Jerdon writes (B. of India, ii. p. 641), throughout that country ‘in open plains, ploughed
land, dried-up paddy-fields, and the edges of tanks and rivers, as well as on sandbanks and
churrs. It is generally in small flocks, from half a dozen to twenty or more, feeding not very
close to each other, and running about in a lively manner, frequently taking flight, circling round
with a cheerful whistling note, and alighting again near the same spot.” Dr. Jerdon includes
two species of Little Ringed Plovers, one under the name of Agialitis philippensis (Scop.) and
the other under that of Mgialitis minutus (Pall.), both of which appear to me to be referable to
the present species; and I may add that though I find, as in the series I examined of 4. hiati-
cula, that there is also in the series of examples of the present species a considerable variation in
size, I cannot discover any characteristics whereby two species can be discriminated. Under the
name of Aigialitis minutus Dr. Jerdon further records the present species as found in the Deccan,
generally among hills, and also from the top of the eastern Ghats inland from Mellore. It
occurs in Burmah, and was obtained at Tonghoo by Mr. Wardlaw Ramsay. ‘Throughout South
Siberia it appears to be very generally distributed. Dr. L. von Schrenck says that it inhabits the
entire Amoor country, and is very numerous on the Amoor river, especially when it is low and
5
long patches of sandy and stony ground are left bare. On the Lower Amoor he met with it at
Pessui, Kulgu, Dsifu, and Dshare. Dr. Radde first met with it at the Tarei-nor on the 23rd April
(O.S.), and found it numerous at Lake Baikal in the summer season. Mr. E. von Homeyer
speaks of a difference in the markings of the tail in eastern specimens; but I cannot, judging
from those I have examined, detect any constant difference between Asiatic and European birds.
Mr. Swinhoe says that it is found throughout South China, Formosa, and Hainan in winter, and
breeds at Talien Bay, North China. Southward the present species appears to range as far as
the Philippines, Celebes; and it is stated also to be found in Java.
So far as I can ascertain from the examination of a considerable series of specimens, I do
not think that there are two distinct forms of the present species; but Lord Walden writes
(Trans. Zool. Soc. viii. p. 89) :—*_4lg. minutus (Pall.) apud Jerdon is a smaller and more deli-
cately formed species. In plumage it closely resembles Hy. curonicus, but has the head-markings
better defined than those of any example of that species I have as yet seen. Its chief distinction
is to be found in the smallness of the feet and shortness of the legs. A Katmandoo specimen
has the legs dark reddish brown instead of yellow. It behoves naturalists in India to investigate
these differences. I am inclined to believe in there being two species, but have not been able to
examine a sufficiency of individuals to form a decided opinion.”
In general habits the present species differs but little from the common Ringed Plover,
except that, instead of frequenting the sea-coast, it affects the vicinity of fresh water; and it is
usually met with on the banks of rivers and shores of freshwater lakes and ponds, where the soil
is sandy and where there are plenty of pebbles and small stones strewn about. Occasionally,
when such places are rare in the vicinity of water, it will frequent sandy patches at some distance
from water; but it then visits this latter very regularly and frequently. In mode of flight, general
appearance, and mode of progression when on the ground, it closely resembles its larger ally; but
its note is different, and much more shrill in tone. Naumann, whose description of the notes of
birds is generally so accurate, says that its call-note resembles the syllables did or ded, uttered
very short, so that the two vowels are almost united. ‘This note is frequently modulated in
various ways, sometimes uttered singly; and when repeated, it is with considerable intervals.
The pairing-note or song begins slowly and is closed with a peculiar trill like the syllables dih,
dit, diill, Uiill, liilliiiviill. This note is only heard at the breeding-place, and is more frequently
uttered by the male, more seldom by the female, when seated as well as when on the wing, but
most frequently when performing the aerial evolutions in which the bird so frequently indulges
during the pairing-season.
It nests in places where there is pebbly ground, like those selected by Aygialitis hiaticula,
and not in localities where there is sand without a strong admixture of small stones. The nest
is a mere depression in the ground amongst the stones; and the eggs, which are deposited about
the middle of May, are four in number, and are, like those of other Waders, placed with the
points inwards. In general character the eggs of this bird resemble those of Aigialitis hiaticula,
being stone-buff or stone-ochreous spotted with blackish brown; but the spotting is much finer,
and there are but seldom any large blotches. Asa rule also I find in the eggs of the present
species more purplish grey shell-markings. In size those in my collection vary from 1,8; by #2
to 1.3, by 3¢ inch.
x2
49
496
6
Mr. Robson, who sent the present species to me under the name of Aygialitis hiaticula,
informs me that “it is a constant resident in European Turkey. They have many breeding-
stations on the coast of the Black Sea, both on the European and Asiatic seaboard, in situations
where valleys debouch towards the ocean, their wide fronts covered with sand and pebbles, with
shallow streams of fresh water trickling over a narrow surface towards the beach. In natural
cavities in the shingle these birds lay their eggs; and in the shallow streams near the sea they
find their food, water-beetles and the larve of insects that come down from the mountains in
numerous small streams that unite as they near the coast. The colour of this species resembles
so nearly the appearance of the locality it inhabits that it is difficult for the untutored eye to
detect it sitting. On its eggs being approached by man it steals off a short distance, curves its
head and tail downwards, and runs in irregular lines, much like a small animal, to decoy the
intruder away from its eggs, which result being accomplished it rises into the air, making a
distant whirl, uttering its piping cry, and, gradually lessening the circuit of its flight, alights on
the sands and waits a favourable opportunity for returning to its eggs. It is lively and active,
and runs with much speed on the sands.”
Its food consists, like that of Mgialitis hiaticula, of small water-insects and worms, and
neyer of vegetable substances. It frequently turns over the stones in search of the small insects
which are found underneath.
The specimens figured are the adult and young birds above described.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a. Hvalé, Norway (Collett). 6, 9. Ekaterinburg, Russia, June 16th, 1868 (L. Sabandeff}. ¢, 3. Casa Vieja,
Spain, May 14th, 1874 (Col. Irby). d. Malta, April 4th, 1868 (C. A. Wright). e. Switzerland (Méschler).
f. Khathane, Turkey, April 6th, 1870 (Robson). g,3,h, 2. White’s spring, near Constantinople, June
3rd, 1871. %,¢. Kalagan, Baluchistan, March 19th, 1872 (W.T. Blanford). k, 3. Secunderabad,
November Ist, 1869 (G. M. Slaughter).
E Mus. R. Swinhoe.
a, 6. Sartchy, Mongolia, May 9th, 1866. 6. India. c,d. Amoy, 1861. e,¢,f,%. Shanghai, May 1873
(R. 8.). g. Hongkong, April 1860 (R. 8.). hk. Hongkong, autumn (R. S.). 2. Hainan, February 1868
(R. S.). &. S.W. Formosa, 1861 (R. S.).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a, 3, 6,2. River Genil, Granada, October. c,d. Seville, August. d, d juv. Seville July 25th. e, f, 2 jw.
Malaga, July 30th and October 8th.
E Mus. C. A. Wright.
a. Malta (C.A.W.). 6. Malta, March 1869 (C.A.W.). c. Malta, April 20th, 1869 (C.4.W.). d, 3d. Mala,
May 6th, 1869 (C..A.W.). e, 2. Malta, May 4th, 1871 (C. A. W.). f, 2. Malta, May 1871 (C. 4. W,).
9,3. Malta, May 18th, 1874 (C. A. W.).
RING-PLOVER.
AGIALITIS RIATICULA.
AGIALITIS HIATICULA.
(RINGED PLOVER.)
Pluvialis torquata, Briss. Orn. v. p. 60, pl. v. fig. 1 (1760).
Pluvialis torquata minor, Briss. tom. cit. p. 63, pl. v. fig. 2 (1760).
Charadrius hiaticula, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 253 (1766).
Le Pluvier a collier, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. viii. p. 90 (1781).
Charadrius torquatus, Leach, Syst. Cat. Mamm. & B. Brit. Mus. p. 28 (1816).
Aigialitis hiaticula, Boie, Isis, 1822, p. 558.
Aigialitis septentrionalis, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 548 (1831).
Charadrius intermedius, Ménétr. Cat. rais. p. 53 (1832).
Hiaticula annulata, G. R. Gray, List of Gen. of B. p. 65 (1840).
Miaticula torquata, G. R. Gray, List of Spec. of B. in B. Mus. iii. p. 68 (1844).
Hiaticula hiaticula (Linn.), Licht. Nomencl. Av. p. 94 (1854).
HMiaticula arabs, Licht. op. cit. p. 94 (1854).
Aegialites hiaticuloides, Heugl. Syst. Uebers. p. 56 (1856).
Aegialites auritus, Heugl. op. cit. p. 56 (1856).
Aigialites intermedius (Ménétr.), Gurney, Ibis, 1868, p. 255.
Ringed Plover, Ringed Dotterel, English; Bodhag, Trileachan traighe, Gaelic; Pluvier a
collier, French; Lavadeira, Portuguese; Frailecillo, Spanish; Corriere grosso, Italian ;
Monachella prima, Maltese; Sand-Regenpfeifer, Halsband-Regenpfeifer, German; de
bontbekkige Plevier, Dutch; Stor Strandpiber, Danish; Tukagvajok, Greenlandic ;
Sandtoa, Icelandic; Strandryle Strandvibe, Norwegian ; Stérre Strandpipare, Sandrulling,
Swedish ; Tyllikurmitsa, Finnish.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 920; Werner, Atlas, Cowrewrs, pl. 13; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. taf. 30;
Frisch, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 214; Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 38. figs. 1,5; Naumann, Vog.
Deutschl. taf. 175 ; Sundevall, Svensk. Fogl. pl. 37. figs. 2, 3; Gould, B. of Kur. pl. 296 ;
id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. 41; Schlegel, Vog. Nederl. pl. 213; Wolf & Meyer, Naturg.
Deutschl. Heft 15.
Ad. ptil. est. supra basin rostri fascia inter oculos nived, supra hane fascia nigra: fascia a basi rostri infra
oculos ad tempora et fasci4i in gutture imo circum collum, sed posticé multo angustiore, nigris: vertice,
occipite et corpore supra fusco-griseis: remigibus nigricantibus, rhachibus versus apicem albis:
tectricibus alarum majoribus albo apicatis: rectricibus centralibus fusco-griseis, versus apicem nigris,
duabus extimis fere omnino albis, reliquis fusco-griseis albo terminatis: gula, fascid collari et corpore
subtus albis: rostro aurantiaco, versus apicem nigro: iride fuscd: pedibus aurantiacis.
Juv. fascid frontali alba angustiore, fascia nigra frontali et fascia in gutture imo nullis: fascia per oculos nigro-
42
497
496
2
fuscA: corpore supra ut in adulto sed plumis in dorso vix pallidiore apicatis: corpore subtis albo,
gutturis lateribus fuscis et fascid indistincté in gutture imo pallidé fusca.
Adult Male (Pagham, Sussex, 4th May). Fore part of the crown, a narrow line at the base .of the upper
mandible, lores, and a patch through the eye and covering the auriculars, and a broad band crossing
the lower part of the throat, narrowing and meeting behind the neck, deep black; forehead and a
broad band passing above and behind the eye, throat, a collar passimg round the neck above the
black one, and underparts of the body pure white; hind crown, nape, and upper parts generally dull
hair-brown ; quills blackish brown, the shafts of almost all dark at the base and white towards the tip,
some of the inner primaries with a white mark on the centre of the outer web, secondaries white at the
base, one or two of the inner short ones almost pure white; larger wing-coverts tipped with white ;
central tail-feathers hair-brown, becoming black towards the tip, remaining ones broadly tipped with
white, the outer ones almost pure white; under wing-coverts and axillaries white; beak orange-yellow
at the base, black at the point; iris brown; legs orange; claws black. Total length about 7-5 inches,
culmen 0°65, wing 5:0, tail 2°45, tarsus 0°92.
Adult Female. Differs from the male in being rather duller in colour, and in having the black bands and
collar narrower, and less pure in colour.
Young of the year (Rye, Sussex, 8th September). Upper parts as in the adult, but some of the dorsal
feathers with light edges; the white on the forehead narrow, and the black frontal band on the head,
as well as that on the lower throat, wanting; patch through the eye and auriculars dull dark brown;
underparts white, the sides of the upper breast and a narrow band across the lower throat dull brown,
the latter indistinct in the centre.
Nestling in down (German coast). Forehead white; crown greyish brown, mottled with ight stone-grey ;
from the base of the bill round the nape a black band passes, and is broadest on the nape; a broad
collar round the neck and the entire underparts pure white; back and upper parts generally greyish
stone-brown, finely mottled with dirty white and blackish brown.
Adult in winter (Pagham, Sussex, 3rd December). Differs from the adult in summer dress merely in having
the black portions of the plumage sullied with dull greyish.
Obs. Specimens of the Ringed Plover vary greatly in size; and, so far as I can judge from many specimens
examined, there appear to be two races found on our coasts, differing only in size—one larger, and the
other smaller ; but specimens vary so much, énéer se, that it is impossible to draw the line between them.
The largest and smallest males in the series are both from Pagham, in Sussex: the former measures—
culmen 0°72, wing 5:55, tail 2°75, tarsus 1:1; and the latter—culmen 0°65, wing 4°97, tail 2:42, tarsus
0:98. And a specimen from Djeddah, on the Red Sea, agrees precisely both in plumage and measure-
ments with the latter specimen.
THE common Ringed Plover is found throughout the whole of Europe, in Africa as far south as
the Cape colony, eastward into Western Asia; and it has also been recorded by Mr, Gould
from Australia.
In Great Britain it is very generally distributed, and is found at all seasons of the year,
frequenting the coasts, chiefly in bays and inlets. Mr. Robert Gray speaks of it as being common
on the coasts of Scotland and the islands off the same; and Dr. Saxby says that in no part of the
3
British islands does it breed more plentifully than in Shetland. In Ireland, Thompson writes
(B. of Ireland, ii. p. 96), “it is common at all seasons, except summer, in small flocks around
the sandy and gravelly shores, where also a limited number annually breed.”
Professor Newton says that it breeds generally in Greenland, and is found on Sabine and
Clavering Islands. It is said to be abundant on the shores of Possession Bay and Regent’s Inlet;
but a nearly allied species was perhaps mistaken for it. Dr. Finsch states that the German
Arctic Expedition brought back five specimens from East Greenland, most of which were obtained
on Sabine Island. One was found frozen in the end of September 1869, and a female was shot
from her nest, which contained four eggs, on the 16th July, 1870, on Clavering Island. In
Iceland it is said to be not rare on the sea-coast and on some of the moors in the interior; and
Captain Feilden says that it is not so numerous in Feroe as in some parts of Britain during
the breeding-season, more especially the Outer Hebrides. He often remarked it flying with
Dunlins; and Miiller notices that it flocks in winter with the Purple Sandpiper. Throughout
Scandinavia it is common. Mr. Collett says that it breeds along the whole coast of Norway,
from the Hvaloer to the Russian frontier, as also here and there in the interior in sandy and
pebbly places, and in the fells above the birch-region. It arrives, he tells me, in April, and
leaves again for the south in September. It has been met with in Spitzbergen, where, however,
it must be of but very rare occurrence. Professor Newton, writing respecting its occurrence
there, says (Ibis, 1865, p. 504), “Sir James Ross states that a bird of this species was killed by
Mr. M‘Cormack in Hecla Cove; and it may be inferred from what he says that General Sabine
also obtained a specimen in Spitzbergen. Dr. Malmgren mentions that Professors Torell and
Nordenskjold found on one of the Seven Islands, in lat. 80° 45’ N., a brood of Ringed Plovers,
which had probably been bred on one of these, the most northern islets of the known world.”
In Sweden it is generally distributed on the sea-coast and the shores of the lakes, from the
southernmost portion of the country up into Lapland. Nilsson says that it arrives late in
March, and migrates southward again in September. In Finland I found it common and very
generally distributed all along the coast and on the islands; but Dr. Palmén says that it only
breeds in the interior in the northern portions of the country. It arrives and leaves about the
same time as in Sweden. ‘Throughout the whole of Northern Russia it appears to be common in
summer, and is met with on Novaya Zemlya, where it breeds. Mr. Gillett mentions (Ibis, 1870,
p- 306) that he saw several families in Matthew's Straits, and also on the eastern side; and
Dr. Th. von Heuglin writes (J. f. O. 1872, p. 11) as follows:—“Is very common on Novaja
Semlia and Waigatch. In the beginning of August we found young in down at the Malotchkin
Sharr, which could only be a few days old. Lives in pairs and families at the sea-shore, as well
as at the edges of brooks and dry meadows. In the beginning of September the young were
fully fledged.”
Mr. Sabandeff says that in Central Russia and in the Ural country it is rarer than Agialitis
curonica, and is chiefly met with on the banks of the Volga. Throughout the Baltic provinces
and in North Germany it is common on the coasts during the summer months, especially in
sandy localities, and is also met with on some of the inland lakes. Mr. EK. H. von Homeyer
informs me that it is not uncommon on the inner bays of Riigen and the neighbouring islands,
as well as on some portions of the coasts of the mainland. It visits Denmark during the summer,
499
500
4
arriving in March and leaving again in September; Kjzrbélling says that it breeds on the large
uncultivated open patches of country and on the islands. Baron von Droste Hiilshoff says that
it breeds on the island of Borkum, off the coast of Holland, but not commonly, though during
passage it is numerous; and Mr. H. M. Labouchere informs me that it is also very common on
the Dutch coast, where it is seen as early as the end of August, and often remains till quite late
in the spring, but does not breed there. In Flanders it is common during the two seasons of
passage, when it is also found along the rivers in the interior of Belgium and Luxemburg; and
in France it frequents the sandy shores of the north and west, as well as those of the Mediterra-
nean, some being resident; but their numbers are largely augmented during the seasons of
passage. Professor Barboza du Bocage states that it is common in Portugal; and Mr. Howard
Saunders speaks of it (Ibis, 1871, p. 386) as being common in winter; but he does not believe
that it remains to breed. Colonel Irby, however, writes (Orn. Str. Gibr. p. 161) as follows :—
“Though I have no absolute proof, 1 am nearly sure that this species occasionally remains to
breed near Gibraltar, as I have shot them as late as the 28th May, and have seen eggs obtained
near Seville as early as the 23rd of March; but this is the only instance I know of their nesting
so far south. During autumn, and until April, the Ring-Plover is extremely plentiful along the
coast, and most so in the month of March.” In the Balearic Islands it is not so common as on
the mainland of Spain; and, passing eastward, I find it recorded as visiting Savoy in March and
again in August; and a few remain, Bailly says, to breed on the banks of the Rhone and the
Isére. In Italy it is principally a visitor during passage, and Salvadori does not think that it
breeds anywhere, Durazzo’s statement that it nests in Liguria being, he thinks, owing to con-
fusion with 4. curonica. In Sicily, Doderlein says, it is the commonest of the shore-birds;
and he asserts that some remain to breed. It is also abundant in Sardinia; and Mr. C. A.
Wright speaks of it (Ibis, 1864, p. 141) as being “common at the heads of creeks and harbours
in Malta in spring and autumn. It commences to appear in March, and is occasionally seen in
summer.” Lord Lilford says that he observed it occasionally at Butrinto in February and March ;
and Dr. Kriiper states that it arrives in Greece in the autumn and remains there over the winter.
It is found also on the Cyclades in winter. In Southern Germany it appears to occur only on
passage, and is somewhat rare. Referring to its occurrence in Bohemia, Dr. Fritsch says (J. f. O.
1871, p. 384) that he killed a specimen on a small pond near Brezan. Mr. Lokaj obtained it
on several occasions in the spring; and Palliardi states that though it visits the vicinity of
Franzensbad but rarely in the spring, it is common in the autumn. Messrs. Danford and Harvie-
Brown speak of it as being rare in Transylvania, where it is occasionally seen on passage; and
Mr. Robson informs me that it is tolerably common in Asiatic and European Turkey; but as he
adds that there are many places where it breeds, I cannot but surmise that he has confused the
Lesser Ringed Plover with the present species, especially as all the specimens he has sent me from
there are referable to 4. curonica. Professor Von Nordmann says that though it is not rare at
the two seasous of passage on the shores of the Black Sea, it is far less numerous than its two
congeners. I cannot but include the bird described from the Caucasus by Ménétriés (/. c.) under
the name of Charadrius intermedius as belonging to the present species; for the description given
by him tallies tolerably well with the small form of the common Ringed Plover, but does not agree
with the Lesser Ringed Plover. Ménétriés states that it is not rare on the banks of the Lenkoranka
5
river, not far from the Caspian. Canon Tristram met with the present species during winter on
the coast of Palestine; and it appears to be a winter visitant to North-east Africa. Captain
Shelley states (B. of Egypt, p. 241) that he only met with the small race or form of the present
species, which he refers to under the name of 4. intermedius; but, as above stated, I cannot
recognize any specific distinction between the smaller and larger birds; and I may add that I
possess examples, not differing from our British species, from Egypt and Djeddah on the Red
Sea. Von Heuglin says (Orn. N.O.-Afr. p. 1027) that it is found on the Nile during the winter,
southwards to the Upper Kir. He also observed it in Abyssinia, on the Tana lake and near
Qualabat and Sarago, in full breeding-dress, in April, and in May and June in the Gulf of Suez.
On the west side of the continent it also occurs; and, according to Loche, it is common in
Algeria on passage; and Favier states (fide Irby, /. c.) that “near Tangier it is found in small
numbers in pairs and companies on the sea-shore. ‘They arrive during the months of September,
October, and November, returning north again in April and May.” Captain Shelley says (Ibis,
1875, p. 85) that he found it not uncommon at Durban, in South Africa. Mr. Andersson speaks
of it as occurring at certain seasons at Walvisch Bay, but only very sparingly elsewhere; and
Mr. E. L. Layard writes (B. of S. Afr. p. 298) as follows:—“M. Victorin procured it at the
Knysna, and Mr. Ayres at Natal. My son shot a fine specimen, in full plumage, at Salt-river
mouth, near Cape-town, in April 1865.” Vernon Harcourt states that it is found at Madeira;
but I find no positive record of its occurrence on the Canaries—though Dr. Carl Bolle states
(J. f. O. 1857, p. 337) that he was told that on the Isleta of Canaria a Plover occurs which, from
the short description he gives, appears to be referable to the present species.
It is somewhat difficult to define the precise eastern limits of the range of the present
species; for in some instances I cannot but surmise that it has been confused with allied species.
Mr. G. R. Gray states that it occurs in Persia; but Mr. Blanford did not observe it there. Nor
does it appear to have occurred in India; for, according to Mr. Hume (Stray Feathers, 1. p. 495),
the record by Mr. Blyth of its occurrence there was founded on error. Dr. Severtzoff, however,
states (Turk. Jevotnie, p. 69) that it breeds rarely in Turkestan; and Von Middendorff says that
he found it breeding on the Taimyr, nearly in 74° N. lat., and that he observed the first on the
Boganida on the 25th May (O.8.). Curiously enough Mr. Gould states (Handb. B. of Australia,
ii. p. 231) that he possesses an undoubted Australian specimen, which was killed at Port
Stevens.
Although during the nesting-season the Ringed Plovers are scattered about, some breeding
on the coast and some near inland pieces of water, yet when the young are hatched and able to
shift for themselves, they all resort to the sea-shore, and are then seen in large or small flocks on
the shingly beaches, sandy shores, or on the mud-banks which are left bare by the receding tide.
They are especially to be met with where rivers or larger streams fall into the sea, and where
large banks of sand or mud are left bare at low water. Here they search after their food, which
consists of aquatic insects, small shell-fish, marine worms, &c. &c. They run with great swift-
ness, every now and then uttering a clear, somewhat plaintive cry, stopping now and again for a
second suddenly and then running swiftly onwards, the body being kept almost motionless, the
head drawn in, and the feet pattering along with incredibly quick steps, making the bird appear
almost as if it were gliding along. When approached too near they will rise on the wing, glide
oOL
6
at a short distance above the ground and settle again at some distance to recommence running
along on the shore. ‘The flight of the Ringed Plover is even, swift, performed by regularly timed
beats of the wings; and as a flock pass through the air they perform various evolutions before
they alight, now exposing the dark upper surface, and now the white underparts to the spectator,
the entire flock moving regularly together. They frequently consort with other species of
Waders, such as Sandpipers, Redshanks, and others; but this is only when they are scattered
about on the ground; for on the wing they keep apart. To some extent, even with us here in
England they must be nocturnal in their habits; for they are said to feed by moonlight; but in
the light balmy nights in the high north I used to find them on the shores at all hours of the
night. With us the flocks break up in April, when the birds have paired; and each couple then
resort to the place they have selected for the purpose of nidification, the major portion remaining
on or near the sea-shore, others, again, taking up their quarters on the shores of inland sheets of
water or on the banks of rivers, and in some instances in sandy localities at some distance from
water. I have frequently taken the nest of the present species, both on the south coast of
England and on the shores and small islands that fringe the coasts of the Gulf of Bothnia.
The nest itself is nothing but a small depression in the ground, frequently just beyond the
reach of the water; and occasionally a few fragments of shells are collected in this hollow, in
which the eggs, four in number, are deposited, they being placed with the pointed ends
towards the centre. Eggs of the Ringed Plover in my collection, from various parts of Europe,
are clay-yellow or clay-buff with an ochreous tinge, and are marked with underlying blackish
grey shell-markings and clearly defined blackish surface-spots and blotches, which are, as a rule,
tolerably generally scattered over the surface of the egg—some, however, being but sparingly,
and others tolerably profusely spotted. In size those in my collection vary from 148 by 2% to
144 by 1 inch.
When the young are hatched they are able at once to run; and at the approach of danger
they squat and hide on the ground, their colour assimilating so completely to the surroundings
that it is almost impossible to distinguish them. When she has eggs, and especially when in
charge of her young brood, the female is most watchful and anxious, and will employ all means
in her power, such as feigning to be wounded, &c., in order to entice away the intruder from
the vicinity of her treasure; and when successful in her efforts, and she has induced him to
follow her to a safe distance, she will suddenly rise into the air and fly off, uttering her joyous
note as if rejoicing at the success of her ruse.
The food of the Ringed Plover consists entirely of small marine animals and insects.
Mr. Robert Collett writes to me as follows:—‘‘ In the stomachs of specimens I shot in Finmark
in 1872, I found Amphipoda, young Littorine, Coleoptera, and fine gravel. In some individuals
from Jederen, in the south of this country, I found in one exclusively Coleoptera (especially
Otiorhynchus ovatus) and traces of small mollusks, and in another the young of Littorina obtusata,
large Diptera, and some few Coleoptera and their larve.”
The specimens figured are an adult male, in full breeding-plumage, and a young bird of the
year, both being the specimens above described.
id
é
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a, b, c. Greenland (Erichsen). d,3,e,2. Pagham, April 1872 (R. B. Sharpe). f,3,9,6,4,6,%,j,k, 3, l.
Pagham, July 1870 (R. B. Sharpe). m,g. Pagham, October 9th, 1865 (H. H. D.). n, juv., 0, juv. Rye,
September 8th, 1860 (H. EH. D.). p, 3. Tarifa, March, 1874 (L. H. Irby). g. Egypt (Hemprich and
Ehrenberg). vr. Djeddah, Red Sea (S. 8. Allen). s,juv. Pagham, July 1870 (R. B. Sharpe). t, juv.
North Germany, July 1871.
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a,?. Pagham, September 27th, 1865 (J. H. Gurney, jun.). 6,9. Gennesareth, May 23rd, 1864 (H. B. T.).
c, 3. Natal.
E Mus. C. A. Wright.
a, 3. Malta, November 5th, 1869 (C. A. W.). 6,3. Malta, May 21st, 1869 (C. A. W.). c,?. Malta, May
4th, 1871 (C. A. W.).
E Mus. J. E. Harting.
a,3,6,92. Northumberland, May 1863 (Beadnall). c, 3. Yarmouth, May 1866 (Carter). d,3,e,?. Kings-
bury, August 1867 (J. E H.). f, 3,9,¢?. Brighton, September 18th, 1867. h,3d,1,9,7.6,4,9,46,
m, dé. Pagham harbour, December 8rd, 1867 (D. Weight). n, 3, 0,9. Pagham harbour, May 10th, 1871
(J. E. H.). p,d. Barnstaple, September 24th, 1870 (J. E. H.). g. Dieppe, May 1868 (Deyrolles). 1,3.
Gibraltar, April 19th, 1872. s,¢. Valentia, April 30th, 1872 (H. Saunders). t,?. Corfu (Wilson
Saunders). u. Morocco (Bowcard). _v,juv. Cape Verd, September 1872 (Boucard). w,d. Knysna,
November 29th, 1865 (C. J. Andersson). «,2. Walvisch Bay, October 22nd, 1863 (C. J. Andersson).
Y, Juv., 2, juv., aa, juv. Pagham.
ov ese
; ; a cd . i } a ; a be wh ee ee Fae :
Pe seainecthior nits, ieee =e etn satin biog ot 3
OFS wae E: pana i.
Genus EUDROMIAS.
Pluvialis apud Brisson, Orn. v. p. 54 (1760).
Charadrius apud Linneus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 254 (1766).
Eudromias, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 545 (1831).
Morinellus apud Bonaparte, Cat. Parzud. p. 14 (1856).
Ir is difficult to say whether other species besides the Dotterel should be included in the present
genus; but, so far as I can ascertain, it stands alone in the structure of its sternum, and Zgialitis
geoffroyi, Aigialitis asiatica, and Afgialitis vereda, which have usually been placed with it,
certainly belong to the same genus as the Ring-Plovers, as I have ascertained by an exami-
nation of the sternum, which agrees with that of Agialitis hiaticula, and differs materially from
that of the Dotterel.
The Dotterel inhabits the Palearctic Region, straggling only in winter into the northern
portion of the Ethiopian Region, its precise range, so far as it is known, being given in the
following article. It inhabits mountain-sides, moors, and uplands, being, as a rule, but
seldom found on the sea-coast. It is generally fearless and tame, so much so as to seem
stupid and foolish. It walks and runs with ease and swiftness, and flies well and strongly.
Its food consists of insects of various kinds, chiefly coleoptera, and probably also small snails
and worms. Its nest is a mere hollow in the moss or grass; and its eggs, always three in
number, are light stone-buff, sometimes with a greenish tinge, heavily blotched with black or
blackish brown.
Eudromias morinellus, the type of the genus, has the bill shorter than the head, rather
slender, compressed, the nasal sinus extending about half the length of the bill, which is
straight to the end of it, then slightly elevated, and decurved to the narrow, rounded, and sharp-
edged tip; nostrils subbasal, linear; wings long, pointed, the first quill longest, the inner
secondaries nearly as long as the primaries; tail rather long, slightly rounded; legs moderately
long, rather slender; tibia bare for a short distance; tarsus scutellate; hind toe wanting ;
anterior toes rather short, slender, marginate, scutellate, the outer and middle toes connected at
the base by a web; claws short, curved, slender, rather obtuse, that on the middle toe with the
inner edge dilated.
187
O05
BANE: |
On
wo
O93
DOTTEREL.
EUDROMIAS MORINELLUS
273
O07
EUDROMIAS MORINELLUS.
(DOTTEREL.)
Charadrius morinellus, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 254 (1766).
Charadrius sibiricus, Lepech. Itin. pl. 6 (1771-1780).
Charadrius tartaricus, Pall. Reise, ii. p. 715 (1773).
Eudromias morinella (L.), C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 545 (1831).
Eudromias montana, C. L. Brehm, tom. cit. p. 546 (1831).
Eudromias stolida, C. L. Brehm, tom. cit. p. 547 (1831).
Pluvialis morinellus (1.), Macgillivr. Man. Brit. Birds, ii. p. 50 (1842).
Morinellus sibiricus (Lepech.), Bp. Cat. Parzud. p. 14 (1856).
Amadan mointich, Gaelic; Pluvier guignard, French; Dummer Regenpfeifer, German ;
Piviere tortolino, Italian; Morinel Plevier, Dutch; Pomerantzfugl, Danish; Fjallpipare,
Swedish; Pomerantsfugl, Norwegian; Kerdjdkurmitsa, Finnish; Zuek glupoi, Russian.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 822; Werner, Atlas, Cowrreurs, pl. 12; Kjerb. Orn. Dan. taf. xxx. ;
Fritsch, Vog. Eur. taf. 33. figs. 16, 17; Naumann, Vog. Deutschl. taf. 174; Sundevall,
Sy. Fogl. pl. 37. fig. 1; Gould, B. of Eur. pl. 295; id. B. of G. Brit. iv. pl. xliii.; Schlegel,
Vog. Neder]. pl. 212; Roux, Orn. Prov. pls. 273, 274.
Ad. ptil. est. capite supra nigro, frontis plumis albo marginatis, fascid puré alb& supra oculos utrinque ad
nucham ducté: nucha, dorso et scapularibus grisescenti-fuscis, his ochrascente ferrugineo marginatis:
remigibus saturaté griseo-fuscis, remige extimo rachi alba, secundariis pallidioribus, nonnullis albido
marginatis: caudd saturaté griseo-fusca, rectricibus omnibus, duabus centralibus exceptis, albo apicatis,
exterioribus quoque margine exteriore albis; mento et guld superiore albis: regione auriculari et collo
imo saturaté cinereis, fascia pectorali transvers4 alb&: pectore et hypochondriis saturaté ferrugineis :
abdomine nigro, posticé et crisso albis vix cervino tinctis: rostro uigricante: iride fuscé: pedibus
brunnescenti-olivaceis.
Ad. ptil. hiem. capite supra et nuch& albicantibus ochrascente ferrugineo lavatis et densé nigricante striatis,
fascia supra oculos angustiore et flavicante cervino lavaté: corpore supra grisescenti-fusco, marginibus
pennarum ochrascenti-fulvidis: mento albo, gula et capitis lateribus albicantibus, grisescente fusco
striatis: pectore sordidé grisescenti-fuliginoso, flavicante cervino notato: corpore subtis imo albicante,
hypochondriis griseo lavatis, et subcaudalibus flavicante cervino lavatis.
Adult Female in summer (Stockholm Market, 25th May). Upper part of the head deep black, the feathers
on the forehead broadly margined with white; a broad white streak extends from the lore, over the eye,
to the occiput, where it meets that on the other side; hind neck, back, and upper parts generally
greyish brown, scapulars and feathers on the lower back margined with fulvous yellow, the scapulars
508
9
and inner secondaries faintly glossed with green; quills dark greyish brown, the shaft of the first
primary white, secondaries rather paler, some of the short ones margined with white; tail dark greyish
brown, darker towards the tip, all except the two central feathers tipped with white, the lateral more
extensively and having also the outer web margined with white; chin and upper throat white; ear-
coverts and lower neck all round pale greyish brown; at the junction of the neck and breast is a
transverse white band, narrowly edged above with black; fore part of the breast and flanks rich
yellowish red; lower breast and upper portion of the abdomen deep black; lower abdomen and. under
tail-coverts yellowish white; under wing-coverts dull greyish: bill blackish; iris brown; legs brownish
green, toes blackish grey, heel orange, claws black. ‘Total length about 9-9°5 inches, culmen 0°85,
wing 6:0, tail 2°85, tarsus 1:5.
Adult Male. Resembles the female, but is not quite so richly coloured, and, if any thing, is a trifle less in
size. I have, however, seen males scarcely distinguishable from females in richness of coloration,
though, as a rule, the latter are much the brighter-plumaged of the two sexes.
Adult Male in winter (Palestine, 2nd February). Crown and nape whitish, washed with rusty yellow and
closely streaked with blackish; the white streak over the eye and to the nape smaller than in the
summer dress, and washed with yellowish; upper parts as in the summer, but paler, and more marked
with fulvous yellow; tail and wings paler and duller than in the summer dress; chin white; throat and
sides of the head whitish, streaked with dull greyish brown; breast dull smoky grey, marked with
yellowish buff; rest of the underparts dull white, on the flanks washed with grey, and on the under
tail-coverts with yellowish buff.
Nestling, one day old (Kautokeino, Lapland). Covered with close short down; head and neck white, washed
here and there with rufescent ochre; centre of the crown black, slightly variegated with pale rufous;
from the centre of the bill to the crown a black line; from the lores to the eye a black line, and one
below and behind the eye passing round the back of the head; upper parts variegated black, rufescent
ochre, and white; underparts, white on the breast slightly washed with rufous buff.
THE range of this Plover does not extend beyond the Palearctic Region during the summer
season ; but in the winter it migrates southward to North Africa.
In Great Britain, where it used to be by no means a rare species, it is now becoming
exceedingly scarce; and unless legislation, which has already saved many species from impending
extinction, by means of the Bird-protection Act, soon interferes, it will, ere long, be an almost
unknown bird with us. It is rarer on the western side of England than it is on our east coasts
during the two seasons of passage. Mr. E. Hearle Rodd says (Zool. 2nd ser. p. 1423), “the
common Dotterel seldom makes its appearance in Cornwall; we find them sometimes on our
open moors near the sea, and generally in the autumn. I observed two in the bird-stuffer’s
hands, which came from the Lizard district near Helston ;’ and, again, in his list of the birds of
Cornwall, he states that one was killed in Sancreed. Yarrell (Brit. Birds, 11. p. 485) says that
“it has not been seen more than once or twice in Cornwall, and only occasionally in Devonshire,
but oftener in Dorsetshire. In Wiltshire, Berkshire, Sussex, Hertfordshire, Cambridgeshire,
Suffolk, and Norfolk, small flocks, or trips as they are called, are seen in the spring on their way
to their breeding-grounds. .... On the chalk-hills about Royston, on the borders of Hertford-
shire and Cambridgeshire, these birds have been observed for many years to make their first
3
appearance in each season by the 20th of April; they are seen for about ten days, some probably
moving on to the northward, and their places being supplied for a time by other arrivals from
the|south:. ... From these counties the birds pass on to more northern localities, and are seen
in Lincolnshire, Derbyshire, Yorkshire, Lancashire, Westmoreland, Cumberland, Northumber-
land, and various parts of Scotland, always inhabiting high ground.” Both Heysham and
Montagu say that it breeds on the Mendips, in Somersetshire, as it doubtless did in their time;
but since then it has been nearly exterminated; and Mr. Cecil Smith writes to me that its
occurrence at all in that county is a rare event, and the last authentic instance he knows of was
in May 1869, when one was shot on the Steep Holmes, and a few others seen there and about
Weston-super-Mare. I observe, however, a notice in the ‘ Zoologist’ for 1871 by Mr. F. D.
Power, who writes as follows :—“ On the Ist of May 1869, I obtained five Dotterels, shot the day
previous on the Mendips. These birds are said to occur here very seldom; however, on the 21st
of August, I saw one specimen and heard another on the same hill where the five were obtained
the year previous.” If the few Dotterel that visit the Mendips meet with the same warm
reception which welcomed the unfortunate “trip” referred to by Mr. Power, it can scarcely be
wondered at that they no longer breed there, but prefer to seek safer quarters. Mr. J. Rocke
records an instance of one having been killed at Lutwyche Hall, in Shropshire. On the east
coast it is occasionally seen in the spring and autumn, but much less frequently than used to be
the case. In Norfolk, Mr. Stevenson says, it is by no means so numerous as in former days; yet
it still visits that county at the end of spring, and again a few months later, frequenting the
warrens and fens of the western parts of the county. And Mr. Cordeaux (B. of the Humber Dist.
p- 91) speaks of it as “an occasional spring and autumn visitant, arriving in certain favourite
localities in the north wolds about the third or fourth week in April, and in the Humber
marshes during the first week in May, where they continue till about the third week, and then
depart northward.”
Although it nested in the lake-districts when Heysham wrote his interesting account of its
breeding-habits in Cumberland, it now no longer does so, that I can ascertain. Captain Feilden
wrote to an anonymous correspondent of the ‘Field’ who appeared to have lately seen this
species breeding near Keswick, but could elicit no response to his inquiries. Mr. A. G. More,
in his paper on the breeding-range of our British birds (Ibis, 1865, p. 431), writes as follows :—
“With respect to Derbyshire, Sir John Crewe informs me that he has often heard from his
gamekeeper that it was quite easy, fifteen or twenty years ago, to shoot Dotterels, when they
had young, on the Derbyshire hills, bordering on Staffordshire. These hills are now nearly all
under cultivation ; and Sir John Crewe believes that the Dotterel no longer stays to breed, though
small flocks are still seen in May..... The Rev. H. B. Tristram tells me that a few pairs linger
on the borders of Durham and Cumberland, and that he has heard of nests being taken on the
top of Cheviot, where he himself has seen the birds..... Mr. T. Edward finds the nest in
Aberdeen and Banff shires; and Mr. W. Dunbar marks the bird as breeding regularly in
Sutherland and Caithness.” In Scotland, though, as elsewhere, its numbers have greatly
decreased, it still breeds in some of the less-frequented localities; and I have seen both the
eggs and the young birds in down obtained there by Mr. E. Booth, of Brighton; and I give
below some details of its nidification in Scotland (for obvious reasons suppressing all information
O09
510
be
respecting locality), communicated to me by Captain H. W. Feilden, to whom, I may add, I am
indebted for most valuable assistance in collecting the materials for the present article. Mr.
Robert Gray, writing respecting its occurrence in Scotland (B. of W. of Scotl. p. 254), draws
attention to the fact that on consulting the old parish records published towards the close of
the last century, most of the compilers had, to some extent, a personal knowledge of the bird in
Scotland. One author, writing in 1794, Mr. John Renton, of Chesterbank, records that in the
parish of Coldingham, Berwickshire, “ Dotterel appear in vast numbers on the heights.”
Various other writers in East Lothian, Fife, Kincardine, Perth, and Aberdeen shires likewise
refer to the migratory movements of this bird; and all these records tend to show that it had
then been sufficiently common to attract attention. At the present day, however, though the
Dotterel may be said to be still regular in its visits to some of the localities just named, it is
absolutely necessary for observers to be careful in watching for its appearance. In some parts
of Berwickshire, for example, the flocks, besides being much reduced in numbers, never remain
longer than three days in their old haunts, which in the early part of the present century they
frequented during as many weeks. Indeed, in other parts of the same county it would almost
seem to have discontinued its short visits... .. In the western counties I have been quite unable
to trace the occurrence of the Dotterel, except as a mere straggler. .... Bearing in mind what
has been said on the now comparative scarcity of this bird in its accustomed halting-places during
its migratory movements, it is not to be expected that the few breeding-localities from the
heights of Dumfries to Inverness-shire will be otherwise than scantily occupied. I am doubtful,
indeed, if more than a dozen pairs are to be found nesting in the whole of Scotland.” The late
Dr. H. L. Saxby, in the ‘ Zoologist’ for 1871, records this species as another addition to the
Shetland list. ‘About the middle of June 1869 I observed one among some Golden Plovers
upon the hill of Crushafiel, immediately above Balta Sound. Never having seen this species
alive, I got a neighbour to come out and shoot it for me. It proved to be an adult male.”
Mr. Thompson, who thinks that it may possibly breed in Ireland, writes (B. of Ireland, ii. p. 93),
as follows:—‘‘ The earliest notice of the occurrence of the Dotterel in Ireland appeared in the
‘Zoological Proceedings’ for 1834, where I mentioned one which had been shot on a high hill
at Finnebrogue, near Downpatrick, a few years previously (it was believed, in the month of
November). I saw the specimen in the house of Mr. Reid, at Ballygowan Bridge, in the spring
of that year, and was told that two others were in company with it when killed. Mr. R. Davis,
jun., of Clonmel, has informed me that he obtained a Dotterel which was shot on the summit of
the high mountain, Shev-na-mon, about the 24th of June, 1835, in company with Golden
Plover. That gentleman himself ascended the mountain on the 18th of August, and saw at
some little distance two birds which he believed to be Dotterels: he imagined that the species
-might be breeding there. He subsequently favoured me with the examination of the skin of
one shot in another locality, on the mountains in the ‘ Liberties of Clonmel’ on the 24th of
August, 1840: it was in a state of moult, and had lost many feathers; but sufficient remained
to prove its being a male and at least one year old. On the 18th of August, 1841, two of these
birds, believed to be an old and a young one, were seen by my correspondent hanging in a cook’s
shop in Clonmel. Although positive information could not be obtained respecting them, he had
little doubt of their having been shot near the town. The preceding information leads to the
5
belief that the Dotterel may, in very limited numbers, annually migrate to the elevated mountains
of the county of Tipperary to breed. If so, they are by far its most southern breeding-haunts in
the British Islands.”
It has not been met with in the Feroes, Iceland, or Greenland, but is common in the northern
portions of Scandinavia, and breeds in some numbers both in Northern Norway and Swedish
Lapland. Mr. Robert Collett informs me that “in Norway it occurs during the spring migration
in large flocks on the south coast, from Lindesnes to the Lower Jederen, and here and there on
the western and northern coasts of that country. It spreads over the more elevated fells during
the nesting-season up to the Russian frontier; and in the southern districts it is found above the
boundary of the birch-growth, more especially on the Dovre and the Langfjeld, down to the
Norefjeld in Krydsherred, and Hekfjeld in Thelemarken (59° N. lat.). In the autumn it
migrates southward the same way that it passes north in the spring, but more to the eastward.
It seldom, however, visits the south-eastern lowlands during passage.”
In Sweden it occurs very rarely in the eastern portions during passage; but in the Stockholm
Museum there are two specimens—one shot in Sddermanland in May 1832, and the other
obtained at Lycksele in June 1834. It occurs in Finland, during the breeding-season, only in
- the extreme northern districts, but is met with in the southern and central districts during
passage, less commonly, however, in the autumn than in the spring; and it would appear
that it is not a common bird in that country. My collector has shot it at Archangel, where
it appears to be of uncommon occurrence; but both Mr. Gillett and Von Heuglin met with it
on Novaya Zemlya. ‘The former writes (Ibis, 1870, p. 306) as follows :—‘ On the 5th of August,
at Matthew’s Straits, I saw an old bird of this species, with a nearly full-grown young one, which
latter I shot. I subsequently saw some more by a river on the eastern side ;” and Von Heuglin
says that he “found small flocks near Yugorsky Strait. At the beginning of September the
young had still some down on the back of their heads; the adults change even the small
feathers.” Professor Malmgren includes it in his list of birds occurring in Spitzbergen on the
authority of Professor Keilhau, who found one dead on a roof at Stans Foreland; but there
appears to be some doubt as to the correctness of this identification. In Central Russia it is
said by Mr. Sabandeff to be rare, and he only once observed it near Moscow on passage; in the
Ural it probably breeds in the Pavdinskaya Dacha; but he never observed it on passage near
Ekaterinburg, or further to the south; Eversmann says that it breeds in the mountains of
Alatau, in about 44° or 45° N. lat. It occurs in North Germany and the Baltic Provinces
during the two seasons of migration, but is not very common; and it passes through Denmark
?
on its way northward early in May, and again on the return migration late in August or early in
September, but does not remain to breed there. In Holland, Belgium, and the north of France
it occurs regularly during the seasons of passage, in May and again in August; and in Southern
France it is stated by Dr. Company6 to remain throughout the winter in the department of the
Pyrénées Orientales.
In Spain it is, Mr. Howard Saunders writes, “‘a regular visitor on migration, but by no
means abundant at any time;” and Dr. A. E. Brehm says that it is very rare, and that his
brother only once obtained one at Mar-menor, near Cartagena, on the 3lst March. It is found
in Italy ; and Salvadori speaks of it as being a regular winter visitant to Sardinia, where it is
4u
OL:
6
met with from the autumn to the spring. Doderlein states that it is very rare in the district of
Modena; and in Sicily it is never very abundant, and remains but for a short time during
passage. In Malta, Mr. C. A. Wright remarks, though common in October and November
during the autumn passage, it is but rarely met with in the spring; and Captain Feilden, who
is at present in that island, writes to me as follows:—‘ I have come to no satisfactory conclusion
why this bird should be abundant in Malta during the autumnal, and very rare during the
vernal migration. Indeed I have not yet come across it at the latter season. In the fall, Malta
appears to be a favourite resting-place for this species when crossing to Africa. My note-book
gives the 23rd of August as the earliest date on which I observed it, and the 11th December the
latest. During the commencement of November 1873, this species appeared very plentiful in
the Valetta market, its numbers culminating on the 8th of that month, when more than one
hundred were exposed for sale. Many Dotterels killed here during the early part of the autumn
passage retain traces of the breeding-plumage. On the 17th September, 1874, my attention was
attracted to an example conspicuous by the chestnut-colour of its underparts, nearly as rich as in
specimens I have procured in breeding-plumage.” In Southern Germany, curiously enough, it
remains to breed in the mountain districts. ‘The Ritter von Tschusi-Schmidhofen writes to me
that ‘‘its distribution in Austria is peculiar. It breeds not only in the Riesengebirge and Styria,
but also in Siebenbiirgen. Bielz met with it on the 28th of June, 1863, in the Zibins Mountain
on a small moor near the highest point of the Csindrell, about 7000 feet above the sea. The
male was shot, and two young birds about fourteen days old caught alive; but the female
escaped. All three are in the Hermannstadt Museum.” He also points out (J. f. O. 1870,
p. 272) that Pastor Hanf found it breeding in the most elevated portions of the Weit-Seethaler
and Judenburger Alps, in Styria, and himself caught a young one there, and also in 1862 took
three eggs. In the ‘Journal fiir Orn.’ 1869, p. 231, he states that the foresters told him that it
used to be common on the Weisse Wiese and Brunnberg, and flocks of thirteen to fifteen
individuals used to be seen, but it is rapidly decreasing in numbers. In 1865 Herr yon
Homeyer killed a specimen, and obtained a nest on the Rennerbaude. Dr. Fritsch states
(J. f. O. 1871, p. 383) that it is met with throughout Bohemia during the autumn migration ;
and he met with it in September 1851 near Schlan. I have seen it in Wallachia in the early
spring, and have specimens from the neighbourhood obtained in April and November. In
Greece it is met with but very rarely during passage; and Von der Miihle states that he only
once met with it, having found six immature specimens exposed for sale in October 1836. It
appears to pass further to the eastward during its passage; for Canon Tristram met with it
commonly in Palestine, and writes (Ibis, 1868, p. 323) respecting this species and its allies as
follows :—‘ No description can give any idea of the continuous flocks which overspread the
whole of the southern wilderness during three days’ ride from the Arabah to Beersheba. Hour
after hour the birds ran almost among our horses’ feet; and we shot as many as we required for
the day’s provision within half an hour. ‘There were about ten of the common Dotterel for one
of the other species; but all seemed mingled indiscriminately. ....The myriads of Helices,
clustering on all the bushes and on every straw, till the whole looked like a sheet of white
blossom, no doubt provided sustenance for all.” The winter abode of this bird appears to be
the north of Africa, on the east extending down the western shores of the Red Sea, according
7
to Von Heuglin, who remarks (Syst. Ueb. p. 56) that it is met with during winter in Egypt and
along the shores of the Red Sea. In 1851 he saw a large flock of Dotterels on the desert
between Sakkara and the Fayoom. Captain Shelley does not appear to have met with this
species during his several visits to Egypt; we may therefore suppose it is not common in the
Fayoom or valley of the Nile. Canon Tristram, writing on the ornithology of the Sahara (Ibis,
ii. 1860), mentions that “vast flocks of Dotterels in winter plumage occurred frequently during
our wanderings, wherever lalpha (Andropogon) or other desert vegetation harboured beetles.
They were very tame, and in good condition. It is of course only a winter visitant.” Mr. J. H.
Gurney, jun., also met with it commonly at Ain Oussera, and says that specimens shot on the
15th March had just begun to assume their summer dress; and Mr. Taczanowski writes (J. f. O.
1870, p. 54) that he met with numerous flocks on the hills between Ghelma and Constantine,
but nowhere else. I do not find any record of its occurrence in Southern Africa, and do not
believe that it passes south of the equator.
To the eastward it extends as far as South-eastern Siberia, and probably occurs in Japan,
as Cassin includes it amongst the species obtained in a collection made at Hakodadi, though
Mr. Swinhoe suggests (Ibis, 1863, p. 444) that Cassin may have made a mistake.
Mr. Blanford includes it in his notes on the avifauna of Persia, a specimen having been
obtained at Kazrtin, west of Shiraz, in the month of January. Severtzoff, who found it in
Turkestan, writes that it occurs during passage in the north-eastern and north-western portions
of that country. In Siberia it was met with by Von Middendorff, who observed it on the
Taimyr river, in 733° N. lat., on the 4th June, but adds that it resorted to the Byrranga
Mountains to breed, in the valleys of which it was extremely numerous. On the 3rd August
the young were fledged; and on the 15th all had left. On the 24th May he met with it on the
Boganida; and on the 14th August the last one was seen there.
Dr. Radde says that, on the alpine tundras at the headwaters of the Irkut, he met with it
breeding on the 15th June, 1859, at an altitude of 7500 to 8000 feet. On the southern slope of
the Munku-Sardik he observed it still higher, at an altitude of 10,000 feet. In June 1855 he
saw stragglers in the Kaja valley, near Irkutsk; and during the autumn migration it touches
Lake Baikal, where, on the 9th September, he saw it in small parties, or singly near the
Possolskish convent. As above stated, it has been recorded from Japan by Cassin, but does not
appear to have been met with in China or India.
Naturally the Dotterel is fearless and confiding in its habits, so much so as to have been
considered eminently stupid; but continued persecution has rendered it, in our island at least,
much more wary. It is more of an upland bird than a shore- or marsh-haunting species, and
frequents heaths, pastures, and fallow lands, where it feeds on insects of various kinds, and
invariably resorts to the mountains for the purposes of nidification. It is doubtful if it now
breeds any where in England, though formerly it used to do so in the Lake district; and some
most excellent notes were published by Mr. ‘IT. C. Heysham in Charlesworth’s ‘Magazine of
Natural History’ (ii. p. 300), which I cannot do better than transcribe as fotlows:—‘“ In the
neighbourhood of Carlisle, Dotterels seldom make their appearance before the middle of May,
about which time they are occasionally seen in different localities, in flocks which vary in
number from five to fifteen, and almost invariably resort to heaths, barren pastures, fallow
4n2
513
14
8
grounds, &c., in open and exposed situations, where they continue, if unmolested, from ten days
to a fortnight, and then retire to the mountains, in the vicinity of the lakes, to breed. The
most favourite breeding-haunts of these birds are always near to or on the summits of the
highest mountains, particularly those that are densely covered with the woolly-fringed moss
(Trichostomum lanuginosum, Hedw.), which, indeed, grows more or less profusely on nearly all
the most elevated parts of this alpine district. In these lonely places they constantly reside the
whole of the breeding-season, a considerable part of the time enveloped in the clouds, and almost
daily drenched with rain or wetting mists so extremely prevalent in these dreary regions; and
there can be little doubt that it is owing to this peculiar feature in their economy that they have
remained so long in obscurity during the period of incubation. The Dotterel is by no means a
solitary bird at this time, as a few pair usually associate together, and live to all appearance in
the greatest harmony. These birds do not make any nest, but deposit their eggs (which seldom
exceed three in number) in a small cavity on dry ground covered with vegetation, and generally
near a moderate-sized stone, or fragment of rock. In early seasons old females will occasionally
begin to lay their eggs about the 26th of May; but the greater part seldom commence before the
first or second week in June. It would appear, however, from the following facts that they vary
exceedingly in this respect. On the 19th July, 1833, a perfect egg was taken out of a female
which had been recently killed on Robinson, and on the 26th of May, 1834, I received four
Dottrels from Keswick which had been shot on Great Gavel the day before: in the ovary of one
of them I found an egg almost quite ready for exclusion, being a difference of nearly eight weeks.
So great a discrepancy, in all probability, is of very rare occurrence; yet it will subsequently
appear that eggs recently laid and a young bird a few days old were both found on the same day
at no great distance apart. ‘The males assist the females in the incubation of their eggs. How
long incubation continues I have not yet been able to ascertain; but I am inclined to think that
it rarely lasts much longer than eighteen or twenty days. A week or two previous to their
departure they congregate in flocks, and continue together until they finally leave this county,
which they do sometimes during the latter end of August, at others not before the beginning of
September. A few birds are, no doubt, occasionally seen after this period; but they are either late
broods or birds that are returning from more northern latitudes. This autumn I visited several
breeding-stations on the 25th of August, and again on the 2nd of September; but in neither
instance could I observe a single individual. Anxious as I have been for several years past to
secure the eggs of the Dottrel for the purpose of adding undoubted specimens of so rare an egg to
my cabinet, as well as to prove beyond ail doubts that this bird breeds in Cumberland, yet it was
not until the present year that I had the gratification of accomplishing an object which I have had
so long in view. After repeated excursions through the lake district this summer for the express
purpose, I was so fortunate as to obtain their eggs in two different localities—namely, three on
Whiteside, contiguous to Helvellyn, on the 29th of June, and two on the 5th July on Robinson,
in the vicinity of Buttermere. The former had been incubated twelve or fourteen days, the
latter were only recently laid; and in both instances the birds were seen to leave their eggs; one,
on quitting them, immediately spread out its wings and tail, which it trailed on the ground a
short distance, and then went away without uttering a single note. On this day [5th July,
1835] a young bird, a few days old, was also captured. Having spent a considerable portion of
9
several days on Robinson, in company with a very able assistant, searching for the eggs of the
Dottrel, [had of course ample opportunities of observing their manners; and I flatter myself that
the following particulars will be interesting to some of my ornithological readers:—On the 3rd
July we found three or four pairs near the most elevated part of this mountain; and on all our
visits thither, whether early in the morning or late in the afternoon, the greater part were
always seen near the same place, sitting on the ground. When first discovered they permitted
us to approach within a short distance, without showing any symptoms of alarm; and frequently
afterwards, when watching their movements from a few paces off, some would move slowly about
and pick up an insect, others would remain motionless, now and then stretching out their wings>
and a few would occasionally toy with each other, at the same time uttering a few low notes;
which had some resemblance to those of the common Linnet (Linaria cannabina) ; in short, they
appeared to be so very indifferent with regard to our presence, that at last my assistant could
not avoid exclaiming, ‘ What stupid birds these are!’ The female that had young, nevertheless,
evinced considerable anxiety for their safety whenever we came near the place where they were
concealed, and, as long as we remained in the vicinity, constantly flew to and fro above us,
uttering her note of alarm.
““As soon as the young birds were fully feathered, two were killed for the purpose of
examining their plumage in this state; and we found that after they had been fired at once or
twice they become more wary; and eventually we had some little difficulty in approaching
sufficiently near to effect our purpose. The moult appears to commence somewhat early in old
birds; a male that was killed on the 25th of July was completely covered with pen-feathers,
and the belly, from incubation, almost entirely bare. The stomachs I dissected were all filled
with the elytra and remains of small coleopterous insects, which in all probability constitute
their principal food during the breeding-season.
“These birds, I understand, are getting every year more and more scarce in the neighbour-
hood of the lakes; and from the numbers that are annually killed by the anglers at Keswick
and the vicinity (their feathers having long been held in high estimation for dressing artificial
flies), it is extremely probable that in a few years they will become so exceedingly rare that
specimens will be procured with considerable difficulty. I have subjoined the names of some
of the principal mountains in this county on which Dottrels have been known to breed, and I
have also added, as far as practicable, their elevation above the level of the sea, under the idea
that this information may prove of some utility to the naturalist who may hereafter feel inclined
to investigate the manners of this species in the same district.” The mountains enumerated by
Mr. Heysham are Helvellyn, Whiteside, Whatson Dod, and Great Dod 3055 feet above the sea-
level, Saddleback 2787 feet, Skiddaw 3022 feet, Carrock Fell 2110 feet, Grassmore 2756 feet,
Robinson 2292 feet, Gold Scalp 1114 feet, Great Gavel 2925 feet.
As above stated, the Dotterel still breeds in Scotland; and Captain Feilden, who took its
nest on the borders of Perth- and Inverness-shires on the 16th June 1873, has favoured me with
the following notes :—‘ The top of the mountain we had ascended was a flattish oval, about three
quarters of a mile long by a quarter of a mile broad; being fully exposed to the sun, every scrap
of snow had disappeared from its summit, which was clad with soft moss (Trichostomum lanugi-
nosum) intermixed with dwarf cranberries and other alpine plants; small rounded fragments of
O16
10
grey granite lay scattered over the surface. Its eastern and southern faces are rocky and pre-
cipitous, and favourite ground for Ptarmigan, of which species we found a nest containing three
eges; the female sat so closely that she allowed me to place my hand within two inches of her
beak before she fluttered off the eggs, and then took up a position some twenty feet off, watching
our proceedings. Her confidence was not betrayed ; for we did not take the eggs, and had the
pleasure of seeing her return to her nest before we had left the spot thirty yards. The nest of
the Ptarmigan is a very scanty affair, merely a small depression scooped in the moss, and lined
with a few blades of grass and a few feathers of the bird intermingled.
“ For many years past a single pair of Dotterels bred regularly on the summit of this moun-
tain; but three years ago a gentleman during the shooting-season, out after Ptarmigan, and not
knowing the rarity of the species, killed the two old birds and their brood; during 1871 and
1872 no Dotterel appeared on this hill; but as two pairs were known to have bred last year on
a neighbouring mountain, we had strong hopes that they might have returned to their old
breeding-ground. Nor were we disappointed ; for after traversing the top of the hill in line for a
short time, Harvie-Brown descried one of the birds, which rose not far from him, and flew past
me, quite near enough to reveal the rich chestnut on the breast. Marking the spot whence
the bird rose, the keeper and I proceeded on, leaving my companion hid as well as the nature of
the ground would permit; after waiting above an hour the bird returned; but, Harvie-Brown
failed to mark it. to its nest. We then adopted the plan of beating the ground closely ; but, after
traversing several acres, we did not discover the object of our search. Again retiring to a distance
of half a mile, we gave the birds a respite of an hour or so. It was about four in the afternoon
when I was despatched to try my luck. Skirting the top of the mountain, I walked slowly to the
spot where we had a suspicion the nest must be, but from the opposite side to the direction we
had taken on last leaving. Lying down behind a small boulder, in a short time I noticed the
hen Dotterel threading her way amongst the mounds and hillocks, and crouching behind stones ;
when running, and when she suspected my eye was on her, her drawn-in neck and body bent to
the ground reminded me much of the gait of a Corncrake; but from the anxiety she evinced,
and the way in which she circled round, sometimes to my rear and then again to my front,
always keeping a distance of some fifty yards from me, I felt convinced that I was close to the
nest. Moving off about a hundred yards, I lay flat on the ground; the bird seemed much
relieved, assumed an upright carriage, ran to the tops of the little mossy hillocks, looked around,
then picked up insects, or snapped at them on the wing. When she thought that the watcher
was quite misled, she again assumed a stooping gait; crouching to the ground she ran rapidly
behind a small grey stone, when I saw her settle. Now I felt confident that I had the nest.
Never taking my eyes off the spot, I was not long in getting over the intervening hundred yards ;
but until she rose from her eggs, within six feet of me, I could not recognize her from the
surrounding ground. She fluttered off her nest as if wounded, and remained calling within
twenty yards, the note somewhat like that of the Golden Plover, but much lower. The eggs,
three in number (the full complement), were deposited in a small hollow made by the bird in
the moss, without lining of any sort. Marking the spot with a handkerchief, I ran back to my
companions, and we all had the pleasure of seeing the bird leave her nest again, and the eggs
in situ. ‘The eggs turned out to be deeply incubated. Owing to the similarity in the colour of
11
this bird to the ground that it affects, it is a difficult matter to watch the Dotterel to its nest,
and when on its eggs a person might walk within a few feet of it without seeing it. Fortunately
for this decreasing species, the lofty mountain-tops which are its exclusive breeding-haunts in
Scotland, are not likely to be often visited by shepherds or keepers during the summer months;
there is no herbage to attract the sheep ; and, with the exception of the wandering foxhunter, no
person is likely to invade the precincts of the Dotterel’s nesting-ground until the Ptarmigan- and
Blue-Hare shooters go up in the autumn.
“Tt is a sad fact that the breeding-haunts of this species have greatly decreased in Scotland
during the last quarter of a century, owing to the indiscriminate slaughter of these beautiful
and unwary birds, when they first land on our shores in the month of May, prior to their pro-
ceeding to the mountains. Macgillivray mentions five Scottish counties in which the Dotterel
bred regularly in his days, viz. Forfar, Kincardine, Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray; and Mr. W.
Dunbar and the late Mr. St. John have marked this bird as breeding regularly in Sutherland and
Caithness. My friend Mr. Harvie-Brown, who passed three breeding-seasons in succession in
Sutherland, the last being 1869, informs me that he never met with the Dotterel in that county,
nor could he, after the most diligent inquiry, gain any satisfactory information that the bird now
bred there, though twenty-five years ago it was by no means an uncommon occurrence; and I
think that it is doubtful if more than a dozen pairs are now to be found nesting in the whole of
Scotland.” Captain Feilden further calls my attention to some notes read at the sixth meeting
of the Natural-History Society of Glasgow in February 1872, by Mr. John Bateson, respecting
the breeding of the Dotterel in Ross-shire, from which it appears that it breeds on two separate
hills in the west, and also on Ben Wyvis.
Mr. Collett, in a letter just to hand, informs me that in Norway it breeds in the mountain
plateaux here and there up nearly as high as the line of eternal snow, chiefly affecting localities
where the ground is flat and stones are scattered about. ‘The eggs, three in number, are placed
on a small heap of Cladoniew; and the old bird will not leave her nest until almost trodden on,
when she will run off, and immediately begins to feign lameness, in order to entice away the
intruder.
I possess a tolerably large series of the eggs of this species, obtained in Norway and Lapland,
which are light stone-buff or dull buff, with a greenish tinge (the latter rarer than the former),
and are very distinctly blotched with large black surface-marks; and there are in some few
specimens a very few underlying dark purplish shell-markings. In one or two the larger end is
so closely blotched as to nearly hide the ground-colour, but the rest of the egg is less marked
with dark colour. In size those in my collection vary from 133 by 13% to 136 by 1,5 inch.
Insects of various kinds and their larve appear to constitute the food of this bird; and,
referring to specimens shot by him, Mr. R. Collett writes to me as follows :—“‘In the stomachs of
individuals shot in June 1871 on the Dovre, I found coleoptera (chiefly of the genus Bembidium),
larvee of Elateres, Lumbrici, and fine gravel; in May 1874 I examined some individuals on the
same place, and found in the stomachs several leaves (of Salix), pieces of straw, insects of
different kinds and their larve, and gravel.”
Mr. Meves has sent to me a copy of some notes communicated to him by Knoblock, of
Muonioyaara, a very trustworthy collector, from which I translate the following particulars :—
OL7
O18
12
“The Dotterel is found and breeds high up in the fells near Kautokeino and Lyngensfjeld.
About ten years ago a few pairs used to frequent Pallastunturi and Aunastunturi, about four
or six miles (Swedish) from here; but I have not seen any there for some years past. Its nest
is very hard to find, as the bird sits close until one is within a few yards of the nest, and then
slips off and tries to lure the intruder away; but the Laps are not so easily deceived, and soon
find the nest by dogged perseverance. This bird is the only Wader here in Lapland which never
deposits more than three eggs; and the full complement is usually deposited between the 18th
and 30th June.” Mr. Meves himself points out that Messrs. Palmén and Sahlberg, who visited
Muonioniska in 1867, say that about the 29th May large flocks of this bird arrived, and, after an
interval of a couple of weeks, left for the fells, to breed. They were so little shy that they might
be caught by the hand; and numbers were snared in hair nooses. On the spring migration,
Mr. Meves says, it is but seldom seen in Southern Sweden and near Stockholm. He confirms
what Knoblock says respecting this bird only laying three eggs; and out of over fifty clutches
which have passed through his hands he never knew one to consist of more than that number.
The largest eggs he has had, measured from 45 to 46 by 29 millimetres, and the smallest 36 by
28 and 38 by 27 millimetres.
Most authors give Hudromias as of Boie, Isis, 1822; but I have failed to find any mention
of this genus prior to 1831, when C. L. Brehm gives it as of Boie, but does not state if, or where,
it was published; and I think it probable that Boie never published it prior to that date, espe-
cially as I find that Boie, in the ‘Isis’ for 1822, refers to the Dotterel under the name of
Charadrius morinellus.
The specimens figured are an adult female from Sweden, in full breeding-dress, and a young
bird, in down, from Lapland, and in the background is an adult bird in winter dress—these being
also the specimens described.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a. Pagham, Sussex, July 1870 (R. B. Sharpe). 6,92. Stockholm market, May 25th, 1864 (Prof. Sundevail).
c, 2. Jockmock, Lapland, May 31st, 1867 (A. Couttingius). d, 3. Jutland, June 25th, 1864 (A. Benzon).
e, 6. Haskeuy, Turkey, November 3rd, 1869 (7. Robson). f, 5. Maslak, Turkey, April 4th, 1869
(T. Robson). g,d. Near Beersheba, Palestine, February 2nd, 1864 (H. B. Tristram). h, 3. Lake
Baikal, July 15th, 1870 (Dr. Dybowski). 1, pull. Porsangerfiord, Norway, July 5th, 1872 (R. Collett).
k, pull. Kautokeino, Lapland, July 1872 (W. Meves).
E Mus. Howard Saunders.
a, 3, 6,2. Melbourne, Cambridgeshire, May 10th, 1855 (H. S.). ¢, juv. Seville, November. d, juv. Gra-
nada, December 1872. e, f,d. Jylland, Denmark, June 25th, 1864. g,2. Vadso, June 28th, 1874
(H. Seebohm).
E Mus. H. B. Tristram.
a, é. Epworth, May 13th, 1867. 06,9. Lincolnshire, April 26th, 1867. c, 2. Sahara, November Ist, 1856
(H. B. T.). d,¢d. Palestine, February Ist, 1864 (H. B.T.). e, 9. Palestine, February 5th, 1864
(H. B. T.).
Genus PLUVIANUS.
Charadrius apud Linnzeus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 254 (1766).
Pluvianus, Vieillot, Nouv. Dict. xxvii. p. 129 (1818).
Hyas apud Gloger in Froriep’s Notizen, xvi. p. 279 (1827).
Cursor apud Wagler, Syst. Av., genus Cursor (1827).
Ammoptila apud Swainson, Classif. of B. ii. p. 364 (1837).
Cheilodromas apud Riippell, Mus. Senck. ii. p. 208 (1845).
Chilodromus apud Agassiz, fide Gray, Gen. and Subg. of B. p. 110 (1855).
THIs genus contains only a single species, which inhabits the Ethiopian Region, but rarely
straggling into the Western Palearctic Region. It frequents the shores of rivers, usually where
there are large sandbanks, and feeds on worms and insects. It is active and lively in its habits,
tripping easily and quickly about the sandbanks; its flight is gliding and swift, and its call-note
clear and loud. Its nest isa mere depression in the sand; and its eggs are said to be dull
brownish ochreous, spotted and dotted with ash-grey, yellowish brown, and reddish brown.
Pluvianus egyptius, the type of the genus, has the bill much shorter than the head, rather
stout, straight, tapering to a point, the culmen gradually decurved to the tip, which is narrow
but sharp-edged; nasal sinus short and broad, the nostrils lateral, elongated-oval, basal; wings
long, full, the first quill longest, the scapulars long and narrow; at the carpal joint there is a
small hard knob; tail moderately long, even; legs rather long, slender, the tibia bare for about
one third of its length; tarsus moderate, scutellate; no hind toe, the three anterior toes mode-
rately stout, scutellate above; claws stout, rather short, curved, obtuse.
188
O19
\ ro
eee y at. RJ
See Tb os
Ye Ue
Bites shri
Lg LF
tt A ree
D
>)
fk
o
J. GKeulemans lith
BLACK-HEADED PLOVER.
PLUVIANUS AGYPTIUS.
Hanhart imp
PLUVIANUS AGYPTIUS.
(BLACK-HEADED PLOVER.)
Charadrius egyptius, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. p. 254 (1766).
Le Pluvian, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. viii. p. 104 (1781).
Green-headed Plover, Lath. Gen. Syn. Suppl. ii. p. 320 (1787).
Charadrius melanocephalus, Gmel. Syst. Nat. i. p. 692 (1788).
Charadrius africanus, Lath. Ind. Orn. Suppl. p. Ixvii (1801).
Pluvianus melanocephalus (Gm.), Vieill. Nouv. Dict. xxvii. p. 129 (1818).
Pluvianus chlorocephalus, Vieill. tom. cit. p. 130 (1818).
Hyas, Gloger, in Froriep’s Notiz. a. d. Geb. d. Nat. u. Heilk. Band xvi. p. 279 (1827).
Cursor charadroides, Wag. Syst. Av. Gen. Cursor, sp. 6 (1827).
Ammoptila charadroides (Wagl.), Swains. Classif. of B. ii. p. 364 (1837).
Cheilodromas melanocephalus (Gm.), Riipp. Mus. Senckenb. ii. p. 208 (1845).
Pluvianus egyptius (L.), Strickl. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1852, x. p. 348.
Pluvianus egyptiacus (.), A. E. Brehm, Journ. f. Orn. 1853, Extrah. p. 102.
Hyas egyptia (L.), Cabanis, Journ. f. Orn. 1854, p. 71.
Hyas egqyptiaca (1), A. K. Brehm, Journ. f. Orn. 1856, p. 329.
Cursorius egyptius (.), Schlegel, Mus. Pays-Bas, Cursores, p. 14 (1865).
Ter el temsach, Arabic.
Figure notabiles.
D’Aubenton, Pl. Enl. 918; Savigny, Desc. de Egypte, pl. 6. fig. 4; Gould, B. of Asia,
part xvii.
Ad. pileo, capitis lateribus, collo postico, dorso et fascia pectorali nitidé purpureo-nigris, lined alba usque ad
nucham et circum pileum ducté: uropygio albo: tectricibus alarum minoribus et medianis, scapu-
laribus et supracaudalibus canis: cauda saturaté cand albo apicat&é: rectricibus omnibus, centralibus
exceptis, nigro subapicatis: remige extimo nigro, extus in parte basali albo, reliquis in parte basali
nigris et in parte apicali albis nigro apicatis: corpore subtis albo, abdomine et gutture rufescenti-
cervino lavatis, subcaudalibus rufescenti-cervinis: rostro nigro: iride fuscd: pedibus cerulescenti-
cinereis.
Adult Male (Egypt). Crown, sides of the head, hind neck, back, and a band passing round and meeting
on the breast, glossy purplish black; a white band passes from the base of the upper mandible round
the crown, meeting on the nape; one or two of the black feathers on the back much elongated; rump
white; lesser and median wing-coverts, scapulars, and upper tail-coverts dark French grey or blue-
grey; tail dark blue-grey tipped with white, all but the central feathers with a black subterminal band ;
first primary black with the outer web white on the basal half; rest of the quills black on the basal
half, then white terminated with black; underparts white, on the abdomen and throat washed with
5
99
a oe
2
creamy rufous; under tail-coverts creamy rufescent; bill blackish; iris dark brown; legs blue-grey.
Total length about 8°5 inches, culmen 0°9, wing 5:5, tail 2°65, tarsus 1°38.
Obs. I do not possess the present species in immature plumage to describe. Von Heuglin states that the
young bird differs but slightly from the adult, in having the underparts duller isabelline rufescent and
to some extent marked with smoky bars. The young in down is said to be brownish yellow marked
with black.
THE present species, which is so common on the banks of the Nile, is but seldom seen out of
Africa, and has only occurred as a very rare straggler north of the Mediterranean. Dr. C. L.
Brehm states (J. f. O. 1854, p. 70) that his son, Mr. Alfred Brehm, on examining a collection of
birds formed by the reigning Duke of Coburg-Gotha, saw a pair of the present species, which
the Duke informed him he had himself shot on an island off the coast of Spain. With this
exception I do not find it recorded from Europe proper; but, as above stated, it is common in
Egypt, and is one of the first birds to attract the Nile-tourist’s attention. It is, Von Heuglin
says, common from the delta into Nubia, rarer on the Blue and White Nile. He observed it
singly in the valley of the Takazié, in Abyssinia, and on the Djur river (in 8° N. lat., 25° 30!
E. long.), but not in the true swamp-region, and on mountain-streams. It is a resident, fre-
quenting the low sand islands and flat shores, avoiding the deep canals, salt or brackish water,
and overflowed tracts of cultivated ground. Captain Shelley writes (B. of Egypt, p. 255) that it
“is plentifully distributed throughout Egypt and Nubia, but is most abundant in Upper Egypt,
from Sioot to Thebes, being almost invariably seen in pairs. They never wander far from the
river-bank ; and when on the wing fly close over the surface of the water, frequently uttering
their cry during flight. They look very handsome as they thus skim along the stream on out-
spread pinions, displaying their distinctly marked plumage to the greatest advantage,’ Mr. E.
Cavendish Taylor also remarks (Ibis, 1867, p. 68):—‘‘ This very beautiful bird is abundant all
along the Nile above Cairo, wherever the banks of the river are muddy; it avoids rocky ground,
and is therefore not so plentiful near Assouan. It was generally in pairs during the month of
March ; but I know nothing of its nidification. I see no reason to alter my previously expressed
opinion (Ibis, 1859, p. 52) that this bird is probably the Trochilos of Herodotus. It has, I think,
a better claim to that honour than the Spur-winged Plover (Hoplopterus spinosus), because it
frequents the same localities as the crocodiles, namely mud- and sandbanks in the middle of the
river; whereas the Spur-wing is more generally met with high and dry in the fields, in which it
would not be likely to meet with many crocodiles.” The Black-headed Plover is also found in
North-west Africa, and some distance down the west coast. Loche says that it is of accidental
occurrence in Algeria; but he does not appear to have obtained it. There is a specimen in the
Berlin Museum from Senegal; it has been recorded by Beaudouin from Bissao, by Gujon from
the Gaboon, by Payés from Casamanse; and Mr. J. J. Monteiro says (Ibis, 1862, p. 356) that he
saw it running along the sandy banks of the river Quanza, in Angola.
The present species does not appear to range into Asia proper; but it seems to straggle into
Palestine; for Canon Tristram says (Ibis, 1868, p. 822) that Mr. Herschell shot one in the
Jordan valley.
In habits the Black-headed Plover is very lively and by no means shy, being perhaps one of
3
the tamest of the Waders which frequent the Nile. It is generally seen running about on the
shores or sandbanks, actively searching for food, or skimming from one sandbank to another,
its wings not widely expanded, and showing the black band very clearly. When tripping along
the shores it jerks its tail and nods its head, and every now and again utters its clear call-note.
During the breeding-season the males are quarrelsome, and may often be seen chasing each other,
uttermg loud cries, which resemble the syllables ting-ting-ting-ting and tschi-tschi-tschi-tscht,
these notes being uttered rapidly in succession. Dr. Leith Adams remarks (Ibis, 1864, p. 29)
that ‘‘ one series of notes, when the bird is alarmed, resemble the words chip-chip-hoit, which it
utters on the wing as it wheels past your boat and settles on the bank.” The food of this bird
consists of worms, larve, and insects of various kinds; and it appears most probable that this
bird is the Trochilos of Herodotus, of which he says that it keeps in close attendance on the
crocodile, and enters its jaws to pick out the leeches, and assists to free it from insect parasites.
Some authors believe that the Spur-winged Plover is the bird meant; but Von Heuglin and
many of those best able to judge give preference to the present species; and he especially
mentions that he found it always in close attendance on the crocodiles, of which reptile it appears
to have no fear whatever.
The ancient Egyptians were well acquainted with this bird; and it frequently occurs in the
wall-paintings in the pyramids, in the hieroglyphics representing the letter U.
According to Von Heuglin the present species nests in our spring in Egypt, and after the
rainy season in the Sudan. It does not make any nest, but merely deposits its eggs, two in
number, in a depression in a sandbank. Brehm says that when the bird leaves her eggs she
covers them with sand; but Von Heuglin remarks that he always found the eggs quite bare,
and that, owing to their sandy colour, they are exceedingly difficult to distinguish. I do not
possess authentic eggs of this bird; but they are described by Von Heuglin as being “blunt
oval in shape, dull, without any gloss, and rather coarse in grain of shell. They measure
135-131" by 103", and are brownish ochreous in colour, closely and tolerably regularly marked
with numerous ashy-grey, yellowish brown, and reddish brown spots and dots.”
The specimen figured is the one above described, and is in my own collection.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a, 2. Egypt. 6,2. Egypt, March 25th, 1870 (G. E. Shelley). c, 5,4, %. Egypt (Hemprich and Ehrenberg) .
LB ]
e)
pretences ae ier \aitenahile’ cds Boor Hi sil aes ehuadhiaas |
rl niga CHV) elroy vase, Bik nied cody Bis galley ne Hite is hecpaaiil ee
Hh: im at ie ‘ui, ate hae wou eave dita basa Bi ulin. Dae HAA &
He i sinlane 7 rooa.ad ent gcee bgd cient enit OTR ea pe, iT aad
a Ae aaw ehlin No: ‘ Figeay Nei CURE th ny seat selhalive. rege) cel gh ait: (ahr: if Nie Perey
(ae Ay OAT ed eatect arty hak otf hotlines eet es isa i hoii it sguioat
Mh tate. (Niger brmaiite “aha ie aie aldcgaasi Fuoedsnbaerar bevist virid nae TE apse 4o.eat
bid) wists IHR tend Orvis Fe meen liken: Kar sasgne stanla ss Dik ee Sead an)
wat dpalt old edorty eigenen, Wiha abe: Dcesiiersh. agsinnn, bHS 2 ROR eS:
‘eae hie some id el ~~ Seda qoasiuk nee ts gga sabi te raalhtoo
Boece ‘ies yeihecs Hiisagsiiy side |
hes te ballast ioe tei aeons ae Es a Ty Seb ne peas eo 2
Pav ce tin es tire Gyiceriet 2 ae aes |e
yay: nb aboeo- 2 feveihs fe i338, Sarai iid yn 3 alte sii: spi pliner seis
op ada
8
themselves in rows on the ropes that ran from stake to stake. The four specimens I brought
away are all acquiring the summer plumage.” It doubtless occurs in Japan, as Temminck and
Schlegel say that they have seen it figured in a Japanese drawing. Southward it ranges very
far. Captain Beavan and Lord Walden both record it from the Andaman Islands; and, according
to Finsch and Hartlaub (Beitr. Faun. Centralpolyn. p. 200), specimens are in the Leyden Museum
from Java and Banka, Timor, the Moluccas, Ternate, Halmahera, Morotai, Ceram, and Celebes ;
Rosenberg obtained it in New Guinea; and Gould (B. of Austr. ii. p. 269) says that he never
saw it in Tasmania or Southern Australia, but most of the specimens from Raine’s Islet and
other parts of Torres Straits were in breeding-dress; during migration it is, he says, dispersed
over every part of the coasts of Southern Australia, the islands in Bass’s Straits, and Tasmania,
all of which, as well as the Houtmann’s Abrolhos, off the western coast, are visited by it. It has
been met with in New Zealand; and Mr. Buller (B. of N. Zealand, p. 222) records the capture
of several specimens on Ninetymile Beach, in the Province of Canterbury, in winter plumage;
and Captain Hutton informed him that he had seen a specimen, in full summer plumage, shot
in April. The expedition obtained it on the Marianne Islands and Stewart’s Island in September
and October. Verreaux records it from New Caledonia, Gray from the New Hebrides and
Aneiteum, Peale from the Kingsmill group, Mathew Island, and the Viti Islands, Graffe from
the Samoa Islands, and Bloxham (J. ¢.) from the Sandwich Islands.
On the American continent the distribution of this species is almost equally wide, as it is
found from the Hudson’s-Bay Territory down to the southern portion of South America.
Captain Blackiston states (Ibis, 1863, p. 130) that he received several specimens from York
Factory, where he observed it in August; and in the ‘Fauna Bor.-Am.’ Mr. Ross gives it as a
rare bird on the Mackenzie. On the east coast of North America I observed it on the shores of
the Bay of Fundy, where, however, it is rare. It is met with during the seasons of migration, or
in the winter, on the shores of eastern North America in tolerable numbers. Dr. Elliott Coues
says that in North Carolina it is very common during migration, and some winter there. In
May, he writes, ‘“‘just before they leave, very perfect specimens may be procured. They begin
to return the last of August, and soon become abundant. Many of the old birds at this time
retain much of their spring attire, and are thus readily distinguished from the young.” I met
with it in Texas; and, as stated by me in ‘The Ibis’ (1866, p. 34), “I found several birds of this
species quite close to the town of Galveston on the 26th of May, 1864; and on the beach to the
westward there was a good number of them. On my second visit to Galveston, in June, I saw a
few, but not so many as on the above-mentioned occasion.” On the west coast it was met with
by Messrs. Dall and Bannister in Alaska, where, Mr. Dall says, it was not common at the mouth
of the Yukon; and, according to Dr. Finsch, it was obtained at Amachnak, near Unalaschka, at
the end of August, by Von Kittlitz. Southward it is met with as far as Chili. As above stated,
I met with it in Texas. Mr. G. N. Lawrence says (Mem. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. 1874, p. 308)
that it was obtained by Xantus on Rio Zacatula, in Mexico; Salvin states (Ibis, 1866, p. 198)
that it occurs on both coasts of Guatemala; Barclay records it from Ecuador, Schomburgk from
the east coast of Guiana, Burmeister from S* Catharina, Darwin from Peru; specimens were
obtained on the Novara expedition, and are in the Leyden Museum, from Chili; and Darwin
records it from the Galapagos. On the islands in the Atlantic it is recorded by Bryant from
9
the Bahamas in April, and Wedderburn and Hurdis met with it in the Bermudas; Dr. Gundlach
speaks of it as being common on the sea-shore in Cuba from September to May; Gosse met with
it in Jamaica; and Professor Newton and his brother, Mr. E. Newton, met with it in April 1857,
and September 1858, on the island of St. Croix. On the west coast of North America the present
species is replaced by a much darker species (S. melanocephalus), which differs in having the
upper surface of the body blackish brown, and the head, neck, and breast sooty brown, the
feathers on the breast with dark markings at the tip, and no rufous in the plumage.
In its habits the present species is a true shore-bird, frequenting, so far as I can judge from
personal experience, the rock-bound rugged portions of the coasts in preference to the marshy
mud flats where the other Waders are usually to be met with, though it may also be occasionally,
though rarely, seen in these latter localities. It feeds on the larvee of various sorts of insects,
small crustaceans, and marine worms, which it picks up from amongst the stones or on the
ground. It runs with celerity, and may not unfrequently be found consorting with other Sand-
pipers, especially Dunlins. Its flight is generally in semicircular curves, the wings being not
fully extended, but sickle-shaped; and it propels itself by quick powerful strokes of the wing.
It turns with ease, and is now to be seen gliding down close to the water, now tolerably high
up in the air. Its note is a clear and loud whistle, resembling the syllables kee, kee, kee, first
uttered slowly, and gradually accelerated. Its alleged habit of turning stones (from which its
name is derived) has been noticed by but few observers; and I myself have never seen it do
so. Audubon, however, relates an instance, from personal observation, of its stone-turning
propensity, and, speaking of four he observed on Galveston Island, says “they merely ran a
little distance out of our course, and, on our returning, came back immediately to the same
place; this they did four different times; and after we were gone they remained busily engaged
in searching for food. None of them were more than from fifteen to twenty yards distant; and I
was delighted to see the ingenuity with which they turned over the oyster-shells, clods of mud,
and other small bodies left exposed by the retiring tide. Whenever the object was not too large
the bird bent its legs to half their length, placed its bill beneath it, and with a sudden quick jerk
of the head pushed it off, when it quickly picked up the food which was thus exposed to view,
and walked deliberately to the next shell to perform the same operation. In several instances,
when the clusters of oyster-shells or the clods of mud were too heavy to be removed in the
ordinary way, they would not only use the bill and head, but also the breast, pushing the object
with all their strength, and reminding me of the labour which I have undergone in turning over
a large turtle. Among the sea-weeds which had been cast on the shore, they used only the bill,
tossing the garbage from side to side with a dexterity extremely pleasant to behold. In this
manner I saw these four Turnstones examine almost every part of the shore along a space of
from thirty to forty yards.”
About the first week in June the Turnstone deposits its eggs, its nest being a mere
depression in the soil, sometimes sparingly lined with a few grass-bents, the locality selected
being usually, if not always, a sandy or rocky soil. On the island of Riigen, Naumann says, it
breeds regularly in sandy flats covered with heath and a few scrubby juniper bushes, and also in
bare sandy places; and Mr. R. Collett writes repecting its nidification on the Norwegian coast as
follows:—‘ The last few years I have examined a considerable number of the nests of this
063
O64
10
species, in particular on the coast of Namdalen, in June 1871. They are mostly built under
large stones, or beneath broad-leaved plants (Archangelica littoralis, or juniper bushes); and
several pairs were generally found breeding in close proximity. ‘The eggs, invariably four in
number, were quite fresh in the middle of June. In their breeding-haunts the birds exhibited
ereat alarm, but did not, like the Charadrii, feign to be wounded. Incubation-spots were found
in both sexes. The stomachs of those examined contained small coleoptera, the young of
Littorine, small crustaceans, coarse gravel, and scales of fishes, the latter perhaps swallowed
accidentally.”
I possess a series of the eggs of this species from Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark,
which are dull greenish grey in ground-colour, and are more or less spotted and blotched with
dull purplish underlying shell-markings, and dark brown overlying surface-blotches, some having
these latter small and closely scattered over the surface of the shell, whereas in others they are
larger and more scantily strewn. One egg is dull light olive-green, with but few markings,
except at the larger end, where it is rather heavily blotched.
The specimens figured are an old male in full breeding-plumage, and a young bird of the
year, in my collection, these being the specimens described.
In the preparation of the above article I have examined the following specimens :—
E Mus. H. E. Dresser.
a,9,6,. Pagham, Sussex, May 1867 (H. H#.D.). c,2,d,e. Pagham, July 1870 (R. B. Sharpe). fic.
Pagham, May 4th, 1870 (R. B. Sharpe). g,3,h,35,1,2,%,5,1,2, m. Pagham, June 6th, 1872. 7,9.
Jaederen, Norway, June 1872 (R. Collett). 0,3. Hitteren, Norway, June 1870 (R. Collett). p, 2,49,
Uleaborg, Finland, May 1861 (H. #.D.). vr. Djeddah, Red Sea, December (S. S. Allen).
E Mus. E. Hargitt.
a,@, 6,3. Clestron shore, Stromness, winter (7. H. Dunn). c,d. Havre, August 13th, 1873 (Pluche).
E Mus. J. H. Gurney, jun.
a, @. Rye, Sussex, May 18th, 1868 (Gasson). 6,9. Tees-mouth, May 30th, 1868. c, ¢. Thornham, February
11th, 1867 (Wilson). d. Fern Islands, April 25th, 1866 (J. H. Gurney). e, 6. Blakeney, Norfolk, August
5th, 1872.
E Mus. J. E. Harting.
a. Orkney, Stromness (Dunn). 6,3. Aldborough, Suffolk, September 14th, 1874. c,¢,d,2. Pagham
Harbour, Sussex, May 14th, 1867. e. Christchurch, Hants, April 17th, 1872. jf. Instow, Devon, Sep-
tember 23rd, 1870. g. Morocco. h. Algiers. 7 Aden, October 16th, 1873. k. Gambia. /. Siberia
(Dybowski). m. Amoy, November 1866 (Swinhoe). n, 3. Wahai, April 28th, 1867. 0, 2. Mauritius,
January 21st, 1865. p, 2. Possession Islands, October 10th, 1861. g. Labrador (Méschler). r. New
Jersey (Krider). s. Pennsylvania (Krider). t, 3. Henley Harbour, August 25th, 1860 (Coues). uw.
Bahia (Wucherer). w. Cayenne (Jelski). a, 3, y, 2. Chili, February 1872 (Reed).
Genus HASMATOPUS.
Ostralega apud Brisson, Orn. v. p. 38 (1760).
Hematopus, Linneus, Syst. Nat. i. p. 257 (1766).
Ostraleqgus apud Macgillivray, Man. Brit. Orn. ii. p. 59 (1842).
Tue Oystercatchers inhabit the Palearctic, Ethiopian, Oriental, Australian, Nearctic, and Neo-
tropical Regions, one species only being found in the Western Palearctic Region. They, like
the Turnstones, are inhabitants of the sea-coast, though they are occasionally seen on the shores
of inland sheets of water. ‘They are shy and wary; and at the least appearance of danger they
fly off and circle round well out of range, uttering their loud alarm-note. They run swiftly or
stalk unconcernedly about along the shore, picking up their food here and there. ‘They feed on
marine animals of various kinds, small shell-fish, snails, slugs, and worms; and they usually
swallow small particles of gravel to assist in the digestion of their food. Their flight is swift
and powerful; and the wings are frequently moved with a quick tremulous motion. Usually
they do not fly at a great height and in wide circles; and their call-note, which is generally uttered
when the bird is on the wing, is a clear, loud whistle. They breed on the sea-coast, their nest
being a hollow in the gravel and stones just above high water-mark, sparingly lined with a few
straws; and their eggs, four in number, are stone-buff, blotched and spotted with purplish grey
and blackish brown.
Hematopus ostralequs, the type of the genus, has the bill long, bent upwards on the terminal
half, about as high as broad at the base, peculiarly attenuated, wedge-shaped, tapering to a point
when viewed vertically, and when viewed laterally contracted from the base nearly to the middle,
then enlarged, and gradually sloping, but not forming a point; nasal groove extending beyond the
centre of the bill; nostrils linear, subbasal; wings long, pointed, the first quill longest; tail
rather short, nearly even; legs moderately long, stout; tibia bare for a short distance; tarsus
coyered with hexagonal scales; toes three in number, rather short, stout, with thick, broad
margins, the outer and middle toes united at the base; claws small, slightly curved, obtuse.
u08
O65
—— Ee _
‘SNOsAIVYLSO SNAOLVWNWH
“YAHOLVO-YALSAO
dur queyuey nN YW
“TAI, SILeULe [Mayr (>
ofan
267
HAMATOPUS OSTRALEGUS.
(OYSTERCATCHER.)
Ostralega, Pica marina vulgo dicta, Briss. Orn. v. p. 38 (1760).
Hematopus ostralegus, Linn. Syst. Nat. 1. p. 257 (1766).
Scolopax pica, Scop. Ann. i. Hist. Nat. p. 95 (1769).
LP Huitrier, Buff. Hist. Nat. Ois. viii. p. 119 (1781).
Haematopus hypoleuca, Pall. Zoogr. Rosso-As. ii. p. 129 (1811).
Ostralega pica (Scop.), Vieill. Encycl. Méthod. i. p. 26 (1825).
Haematopus capensis, Licht. Verz. Doubl. p. 73 (1823).
Ostralega europea, Less. Man. d’Orn. ii. p. 300 (1828).
Haematopus balthicus, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutsch]. p. 562 (1831).
Haematopus orientalis, C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl. p. 563 (1831).
Ostralequs hematopus, Macgill. Man. Brit. Orn. i. p. 59 (1842).
Hematopus macrorhynchus, Blyth, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xiv. p. 548 (1845).
Hematopus longirostris, Swinh. Ibis, 1863, p. 406, nec Vieill.
Hematopus ostralequs (L.), Blyth, Ibis, 1867, p. 166.
Hematopus osculans, Swinhoe, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1871, p. 405.
Gille-Brideun, Gaelic; Huitrier pie, French; Ostraceiro, Portuguese ; Beccaccia di mare,
Italian; Aisha-el-behar, Moorish;