esp,
Agulhas Cape, 13
Algoa Bay, 20
Amanzimtoti, 37
Bashee, 29
Bazaruto Island, 51
Beira, 52
Bredasdorp Coast, 14
Buffalo River, 26
Bushmans River, 22
Camps Bay, 8
The Cape, 9
Cape Agulhas, 13
Cape of Good Hope, 9
Cape Padrone, 21
Cape Point, 9
Cape Town, 7
Chalumna River, 25
Dassen Island, 6
Delagoa Bay, 49
Durban, 39
East London, 26
False Bay, 12
Fish Point, 24
Great Fish Point, 24
Great Kei River, 27
Inhaca, 47
Inhambane, 50
Isipingo, 38
Kalk Bay, 10
Kei Mouth, 27
Kei River, 27
Knysna, 17
Kowie River, 23
Kosi Bay, 45
—
OONOahWHh
Swakopmund
Walfish Bay
Port Nolloth
Lamberts Bay
St. Helena Bay
Saldanha Bay
Dassen Island
Cape Town
Camps Bay
The Cape
Cape of Good Hope
Cape Point
Kalk Bay
Simons Bay
False Bay
Cape Agulhas
Bredasdorp Coast
St. Sebastian Bay
Mossel Bay
Knysna
Plettenberg Bay
Tsitsikama
Algoa Bay
Port Elizabeth
Cape Padrone
Bushmans River
Kowie River
Port Alfred
Great Fish Point
Chalumna River
Buffalo River
East London
SOUTHERN AFRICAN
Kei Mouth
Great Kei River
Transkei
Bashee
Xora River
Umtata River
Umgazi River
Port St. Johns
Pondoland
Port Shepstone
Umkomaas River
Amanzimtoti
Isipingo
Durban
Umgeni River
Umhlanga
Tugela River
Zululand
Richards Bay
St. Lucia Bay
Kosi Bay
Maputoland 49)
Inhaca cceencee
L
Ponte Mahone M
Ponte Maone
Delagoa Bay
Lourenco Marques
Polana
Inhambane
Bazaruto Island
Beira
Zambezi River
ALOR I, ACO R yy, — iglEteaey.. OOO Gy,
Lamberts Bay, 3
Lourenco Marques, 49
Maputoland, 46
Mossel Bay, 16
Plettenberg Bay, 18
Polana, 49
Pondoland, 34
Ponte Mahone, 48
Ponte Maone, 48
Port Alfred, 23
Port Elizabeth, 20
Port Nolloth, 2
Port Shepstone, 35
Port St. Johns, 33
Richards Bay, 43
St. Helena Bay, 4
St. Lucia Bay, 44
St. Sebastian Bay, 15
Saldanha Bay, 5
Simons Bay, 11
Swakopmund, 1
Transkei, 28
Tugela River, 41
Tsitsikama, 19
Umgazi River, 32
Umgeni River, 39
Umhlanga, 40
Umkomaas River, 36
Umtata River, 31
Walfish Bay, 1
Xora River, 30.
Zambezi River, 53
Zululand, 42
J. L. B. SMITH
ICHTHYOLOGICAL PAPERS
1931—1943
J. LL.B. SMITH
ICHTHYOLOGICAL PAPERS
1931—1943
Vol. 1
Edited by
Margaret M. Smith
PUBLISHED BY THE J. L. B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY
RHODES UNIVERSITY . GRAHAMSTOWN
1969
Printed by Cape & Transvaal Printers Ltd., Cape Town.
VOLUME 1
Contents
PAGE
New and little known fish from the south and east coasts of Africa. Rec. Albany Mus. ]
4 (1): 145-160 Pl. 16. January 1931
An interesting new myctophid fish from South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 21 (2): 17
125-127 Pl. 9. April 1933
The South African species of the genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 21
21 (2): 129-150 Pls. 10-12. April 1933
The growth changes of Pteroplatea natalensis, G and T. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 22 43
(1): 83-87 Pl. 4. August 1934
Marine fishes of seven genera new to South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 22 (1): 49
89-100 Pls. 5-6. August 1934
The Triglidae of South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 22 (4): 321-336 Pls. 16-23. 61
December 1934 '
The fishes of the family Mugilidae in South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 30 (5): 587-644 77
Pls. 15-22. February 1935
The “‘galjoen”’ fishes of South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 23 (3): 265-276 Pls. 135
13-17. September 1935
New and little known fishes from South Africa. Rec. Albany Mus. 4 (2): 169-235 147
Pls. 18-23. Mav 1935
Fresh-water fishes of eastern Cape Province in A guide to the vertebrate fauna of the 215
eastern Cape Province South Africa. Part II Reptiles, Amphibians, and Freshwater
Fishes: 119-141 Pls. 29-34. 1937. Albany Museum, Grahamstown
The South African species of the family Aluteridae. Rec. Albany Mus. 4 (2): 358-364 238
Pls. 40-42. May 1935
PAGE
The genus Tripterodon Playfair. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 23 (4): 303-310 Pls. 21-23. 245
February 1936
Two interesting new fishes from South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 24 (1): 1-6 253
Pls. 1-2. June 1936
New gobioid and cyprinid fishes from South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 24 (1): 259
47-55 Pls. 3-5. June 1936
New records of South African fishes. Ann. Natal Mus. 8 (2): 167-197 Pl. 11. May 269
1937
Acknowledgements
I wish to express my appreciation:
for the permission granted by the following to reproduce the papers in this volume:
1. The Director, Albany Museum, Grahamstown;
2. The Editor, Royal Society of South Africa, Cape Town;
3. The Acting Director, Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg;
4. The Editor, Nature, London;
to Miss M. Igglesden for many hours of work compiling the index;
to the staff of the Department of Ichthyology for their encouragement and assistance.
Margaret M. Smith,
Grahamstown.
June, 1968.
JAMES LEONARD BRIERLEY SMITH was born in Graaff-Reinet, Cape Colony, on
September 26, 1897, and died in Grahamstown on January 8, 1968.
His love of fishes dated back to when, as a small boy at Knysna, he caught his first small
silvery fish (Diplodus sargus). From then on angling and fishes became a passion that
lasted until the end of his life.
After an outstanding career in Chemistry, when by means of bursaries and scholarships,
he put himself through Stellenbosch and Cambridge Universities, he returned in 1923 to
lecture at Rhodes University College in Grahamstown. He was a brilliant, inspiring and
much loved lecturer and teacher, and an indefatigable research worker. As such he came
up against the “Old Guard” who had graduated to Chairs in the College from being
school teachers, and looked askance at scientific research work. The turning point of his’
life probably came when he refused to spend his own precious time washing up students’
apparatus at the end of the year but offered to pay an unskilled person to do his share!
When the Chair of Chemistry fell vacant, he was passed over. The only two members
of the Senate who had doctorates, Professor S. Schonland, head of the Botany Depart-
ment, and Professor J. E. Duerden, head of the Zoology Department, both fought bitterly
to have Smith appointed to the Chair, but they were overruled, the excuse being that
Organic Chemistry was a static subject of the past with no future! A Physical Chemist
was appointed. Thus Chemistry’s loss proved ultimately to be Ichthyology’s gain.
Time he would have spent on administration was given to research in Chemistry during
official (and some unofficial) hours, and in Ichthyology during his spare time.
He published his first short ichthyological paper in the Records of the Albany Museum
in 1931, illustrating it himself with what he considered reasonable sketches.
H. W. Parker, the herpetologist at the British Museum who was a student with him at
Cambridge, wrote saying he was surprised to see a chemist publishing a paper on fishes.
The text was quite good but the illustrations were terrible! For the next ichthyological
paper he produced, he spent many arduous hours over the illustration which he redrew
a number of times. The result (Myctophum (Nasolvchnus) florentii) was certainly worth all
the trouble. He continued to illustrate his own papers until 1941. From 1943 with the
Early Juvenile Stadia his wife, Margaret Mary, began illustrating his publications. Little
did she realise where that was to lead her! |
These two volumes represent the first phase of his ichthyological researches. During
the war (1939-45) most of his time had of necessity to be given to teaching Chemistry,
and at this period he published three Chemistry text-books.
In September 1945 he was invited to produce a book on South African fishes.
He had arrived at the parting of the ways. The newly formed South African Council
for Scientific and Industrial Research made it possible for him to devote all his time to
Ichthyology. He was given a grant of £800 p.a. to be renewed annually. It carried neither
pension nor other benefits, and he lost his government pension due to him after 25 years
of teaching because he refused to state that he was retiring from teaching on medical
grounds.
But to the end the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research which had taken over
the old ‘‘Research Grant Board” that had assisted him with these early papers, supported
his work in every way.
In 1946 The Department of Ichthyology was founded and built up round his work.
From 1946-1949 while busy writing The Sea Fishes of Southern Africa, he published
seven more ichthyological papers in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History,
London. These have not been included here as they are regarded as belonging to the
second phase of his ichthyological work. Although A neutral solution of formaldehyde for
biological purposes was published in 1947, it was read in 1944 and has been reprinted at
the end.
In two big monographs in volume 2, viz. The South African fishes of the families
Sparidae and Denticidae and A living coelacanthid fish from South Africa, Smith’s personal
copies have been used for reprinting and his own corrections have been reproduced. In
the rest of the papers minor typographical errors have been corrected.
1
Records of the Albany Museum. Vol. IV. No. 1. pp. 145—160.
Pl. XVI. January, 1931.
New and little known fish from the south and east coasts
of Africa.
By J. L. B. SMITH, M.Sc., Ph.D.
(With Plate XVI.)
FAMILY GRAM MICOLEPIDAE.
Prionolepis n.g.
Body ovate, deep, very compressed. Anterior ridges on head
and body strongly serrate. Scales small, embedded at right angles
to the skin, with serrulate recurved upper edge. Whole of head
and body scaly. Spinous and soft portions of dorsal and anal
united; spines of dovsal, anal and ventrals stout, with serrated
ridges. No spines on body at base of median fins, but alternate
scales at base of dorsal and anal enlarged. Ventrals thoracic,
reduced to a pair of spines and a few rudimentary rays. Mouth
small, terminal horizontal. Gills 4, a slit behind the 4th. Gill
membranes united to the isthmus. Gill rakers moderate, slender.
Branchiostegals few, reduced. Pseudobranchiae absent. Lateral
line obscure. Nostrils paired.
This genus appears to be intermediate between Xenolepi-
dichthys Gilchrist and Vesposus Jordan or somewhat closer to
the latter, but is sharply distinguished from the other genera of
the family by the character of the scales. This singular family
now contains four monotypic genera, two of which are South
African.
Prionolepis hewitti n. sp.
Body ovate, deep, very compressed. Dorsal profile elevated.
Depth 13, length of head 3 in length of body. Maximum width
of body at shoulder, 10 in length of body. Eye 2 in length of
head, slightly greater than snout, twice interorbital width. Mouth
small, terminal horizontal. Maxilla non-protractile, extends to
almost below anterior nostril. A single series of small vertically
implanted incisors in each jaw. Small teeth in bands on vomer.
Dentigerous pharyngeals present. Nostrils paired, circular, close
146 Smith—New South African Fish.
together in a pentagonal depression before the orbit, edges of
this depression serrate. Pre- and supra-orbital ridges serrate.
2 serrated ridges from snout to base of spinous dorsal; similar
ridges from the chin to the ventrals. 2 small ridges on snout,
each with 3 very small recurved spines. Gills 4, a slit behind
the 4th. Gill rakers moderate slender, about 13 on lower limb
of anterior arch. Gill opening normal, membranes joined to the
isthmus. Branchiostegals 3 much reduced. Pseudobranchiae
absent.
The scales are small, embedded at right angles to the skin,
and have a denticulate recurved upper edge. The whole of the
head and body is scaly. Lateral series 91., lateral tr. 14:18
longitudinal series on cheek: lateral line tubules about 35. Lateral
line gently curved, very obscure on posterior half of body.
Alternate scales at bases of dorsal and anal much enlarged and
sharply ridged.
D V 29. Commences above hind margin of opercle. 1st spine
longest slightly less than head, has 2 anterior and on each side
two ridges, each with recurved spinelets. The remaining spines
decrease in length to the 5th which is about half the length of
the first. The 2nd—5th spines have on each side a ridge of
recurved spinelets. The soft rays which are simple, uniform and
somewhat shorter than the 5th dorsal spine, have on each side a
row of recurved raylets. i
A II 28. Commences below the 3rd dorsal spine. lst spine
half the length of, and similar in structure to, the first dorsal
spine. 2nd spine subequal and similar to the 5th dorsal spine.
Rays slightly shorter than, but exactly similar to the soft dorsal
rays.
P 17, length of head, rays simple, base immediately below
hind margin of opercle.
V I (2 or 3), thoracic, rays rudimentary. Spines similar
to and slightly shorter than the first anal spine.
Caudal truncate, rays 26, similar in structure to dorsal and
anal rays, each having a lateral row of recurved raylets on each
side. Peduncle tapering posteriorly, subequal to eye.
Prionolepis hewilti n. sp. X 2}.
Below : scaling of right side, x about 7,
148 Smith.—New South African Fish.
Colour. Light yellowish; abdominal area and operculum dull
silvery. A black blotch above the orbit, tapering to a point at
the base of the spinous dorsal. A narrow black bar across the
posterior part of the caudal peduncle. A black transverse band
across the posterior third of the body, about half the depth at
this point, and about one third wide as long. A narrow black
irregular band below the posterior ? of soft dorsal and anal,
following the dorsal and anal profiles. A few isolated angular
dark spots on the body. Fins light yellow.
Sex and condition cannot be determined without dissection,
although the specimen is almost certainly juvenile.
A single specimen, 40 mm. in length,* cast up during a storm
at Great Fish Point.
Type and only known specimen in the Albany Museum.
*In all these descriptions, length of body excludes the caudal fin.
FAMILY SOLEIDAE.
Synaptura barnardi n.sp. (PI. XVI.)
Dextral. Body lanceolate. Depth 23, length of head 4}
in length of body. Eye 7 in head, 1? in snout, about twice inter-
orbital width. Upper eye in advance of lower slightly more than
half eye diameter. Lower and anterior border of lower eye with
a filamentous fringe. Snout blunt, rounded, scarcely hooked.
Cleft of mouth extends to below the centre of the lower eye:
posterior margins of lips on coloured side fringed. Teeth very
minute on jaws on blind side only. Anterior right nostril tubular:
posterior with a fringed flap. Anterior left nostril surrounded
by a fringed flap, developed behind covering a naked groove.
Preopercle hidden below the skin. Opercular margin strongly
fringed on blind side: lightly fringed on upper margin on
coloured side. Opercular membrane joined to the upper margin
of the base of the pectoral on the blind side. On the coloured
side, the membrane is joined to the body well below the base of
the pectoral and forms an extraneous fold which extends upwards
obscuring more than half of the base of the pectoral,
Smith—New South African Fish. 149
D. 78. Commences on the snout in front of the lower margin
of the upper eye: rays articulated, membrane slightly incised.
Anterior rays short, graduated: middle anterior rays 33, posterior
rays 4 in length of head. On the blind side, all the rays have a
membranous fringe joined to the body at the base of the fin:
fringe more pronounced anteriorly. Fin joined to the caudal.
A. 57. Rays similar to the dorsal rays.
Pectorals small but well developed: right pectoral 8 in length
of head, left pectoral very slightly longer, about 7 in head.
Scales small, strongly ctenoid on coloured side, a few on the
head and along the lateral line bearing short filamentous process.
11 about 110. Scales on the blind side rounded or very feebly
ctenoid. Lateral line very gently curved, almost straight, extend-
ing to above the preopercle on the right side. On the blind side,
the lateral line is similar as far as the head, where it bifurcates,
one branch turning down to near the corner of the mouth, the
upper branch, at 180° to the lower, extending slightly obliquely
back to near the base of the dorsal and then curving sharply
forwards.
Right side. Blind side.
Scales of Synaptura barnardt n.sp.
Caudal lanceolate, slightly rounded, 2 in length of head.
Colour. On the right side the ground colour is light grey.
Some very small isolated brownish spots on the head and body.
Irregular very small white spots chiefly along the lateral line
and on the anterior upper part of head and body. Median fins
slightly darker at base, outer margins lighter: regular series of
150 Smith—New South African Fish.
light and of dark dots on the base of dorsal and anal. Caudal
with close set dark spots, margin lighter, end brownish. Right
pectoral light with reddish margin. Ventrals light.
A single specimen 86 mm. in length from Great Fish Point,
in very shallow water.
Type in the Albany Museum.
This species is very close to marginata Boulenger, but differs
in the very small pectorals and in the presence of the curious fold
in the opercular membrane on the right. side.
It is noteworthy that many species of “Soles” are abundant
in shallow water on the coast about Great Fish Point. The reefs
of rock are very low at this point extending with very little fall
some hundred yards below low water mark. Sand accumulates
between the rocks, and fair numbers of “Soles,” up to a length
of 500 mm., are obtained by wading out from knee to thigh deep
in the water at low tide, and stabbing these patches of sand with
a “spear,” resembling a pitchfork. The specimen described was
secured in this manner.
FAMILY SCORPIDIDAE.
Neoscorpis n.g.
Body oblong-ovate. Mouth small, terminal. The outer series
of teeth in the jaws more or less enlarged and lanceolate. An
upper and lower pair of dentigerous pharyngeals well developed.
Minute teeth in bands on vomer and palatines, maxilla expanded
posteriorly. Gill rakers moderate. Dorsal spines 6-8, in a deep
groove, increasing in length posteriorly: soft portion longer than
spinous, anterior rays subfalcate forming a prominent lobe. Anal
spines graduated, soft rays similar to those of the dorsal. Anal
dorsal and caudal scaly. Differs from Scorpis C. and V. in the
absence of serrations on the preopercle, in the absence of lingual
teeth, and in the smaller number of dorsal spines.
A South African genus with one species, now recorded from
Knysna to the Natal coast.
Smith—New South African Fish. 151
Neoscorpis lithophilus G. and T.
Stone-fish (Natal), Butter-fish (Eastern Province).
1908 Gilchrist and Thompson. Ann. 8. Afr. Mus. vol I, p. 162.
1917 ibid. Ann. Durb. Mus. vol. I, pt. 4,
p. 365.
1925 Barnard. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. vol. XXI, p. 663, pl.
XXVIII, fig. I.
Depth 23 (Juv.) —2 (Ad.), length of head 34 (Juv.) —434
(Ad.) in length of body. Eye 3—4 in length of head, in Juv. less
than, in Ad. equal to snout; 1 (Juv.) —12 (Ad.) in interorbital
width. Snout obtuse, interorbital prominent. Maxilla extends to
below anterior border of eye. Teeth in bands in both jaws, outer
row enlarged, lanceolate. Whole of head except interorbital space,
- gnout and chin, scaly. Soft dorsal, soft anal and caudal scaly.
Very fine naked groove at base of soft dorsal. Gill rakers 12-13
on lower limb of anterior arch. Pyloric caeca very numerous and
long. Sealy process in axil of ventrals ill defined in young exam-
ples D VI—VIII, 20—22. Spines short and stout, increasing in
size posteriorly. Anterior rays, almost length of head, subfalcate
forming a prominent lobe. A III 23—26. Spines short and stout,
graduated. 1st spine 3 and 8rd spine 1 in eye diameter. Anterior
soft rays equal and similar to dorsal rays. Lateral line almost
straight. Scales II 90—97, |. tr. we
Colour. Silvery grey. In young often 7—8 faint dark cross
bars equal to the interspaces. Interorbital darker with a broad
light grey space on dorsal area. Ventrals light, remaining fins
dark grey. Soft dorsal, soft anal and caudal with a black mar-
ginal band about one-sixth of eye diameter. Membrane of dorsal
spines black. Iris yellow. A semi-circular black mark on the
hinder margin of the operculum.
Locality. Knysna, Port Alfred, Great Fish Point, Isipingo,
Natal coast.
Distribution. South and south-east coasts of Africa.
I have been fortunate in securing a well graduated series of
specimens ranging in length from 44 to 468 mm. The number of
dorsal spines appears to be commonly six, rarely seven or eight.
152 Smith.—New South African Fish.
This species is fairly common among rocks in shallow water;
very young specimens appear to be most plentiful during the
middle summer months. On the coast south of Natal, it is a
somewhat rare capture on lines, but is frequently secured by net
and spear at night with the aid of a light. It is esteemed as a
food fish, the flesh being of fine texture and of excellent flavour.
In April 1929, after a flood in the Great Fish River had caused
considerable pollution of the sea for some miles west of the
mouth, a number of specimens of this species was taken by hand
in the shallow surf near the mouth of the river by a party of
anglers. The specimens were alive but evidently suffering from
partial suffocation induced by the amount of fine particles of
clay in suspension in the sea water. At these times, the sea is
coloured from red to deep brown, and relatively large numbers of
immature fish of various species are cast up dead by the waves,
while the larger specimens appear to desert temporarily the
normal angling spots.
FAMILY BLENNIIDAE.
Blennius fascigula Barnard. (Pl. XVI.)
‘Rocky’ (Eastern coasts).
1925. Barnard. Ann. S.A. Museum, vol. XXI, p. 834.
Depth 4—43, length of head 33—4 in length of body. Eye
3$—4 in length of head, slightly greater than interorbital width,
slightly less than snout. Profile of head very abruptly descending.
Maxilla extends to below anterior third of the eye. Canines in
both jaws, those in the lower jaw slightly larger: canines visible
in even very small specimens. No occipital filaments. Nasal
tentacles short, fimbriate. Supraorbital tentacles with a short
flattened stalk, widening above and bearing 5—6 filaments, total
length equal to the eye. Interorbital concave, groove extending
to the snout.. A shallow transverse groove behind the orbits:
another very shallow transverse groove before the base of the
dorsal. Gill membranes united forming a fold across the throat.
LL. anteriorly a double row of pores.
Smith—New South African Fish. 153
D. XII. 19—22, commences above the hinder margin of the
preopercle, very slightly notched between the spinous and soft
portions. Dorsal not joined to the caudal.
A. II. 20-—-22. The two spines in the male enveloped in thick
spongy skin. 1st spine obscure in females. Caudal rounded.
Colour. Ground colour yellowish, 7 (Type 5) vertical cross
bars about equal to the interspaces from the middle of the side
extending on to the base of the dorsal. A variable longitudinal
series of dark spots in pairs below the bars. Irregular dark spots
on the lower part of the body. Small dark spots on the head, on
the dorsal and on the base of the pectoral. Anal dark with
projecting ends of the rays light. A dark tapering spot at the
base of each alternate anal ray in some cases. Caudal light
immaculate. A dark bar across the chin. Two dark bars across
the throat; the hinder bar sometimes bifurcates on the side, and
in some specimens a faint cross bar shows across the base of the
ventrals. Usually a dark spot between the first and second dorsal
spines.
Length up to 85 mm.
Locality. Cove Rock, East London.
The species is founded upon a not too well preserved juvenile
specimen from an unknown locality, and the original description
is therefore necessarily somewhat inadequate. Neither the type
nor my specimens show three clear cross bars across the throat,
besides the one on the chin. A number of specimens from this
locality which agree generally with this amended diagnosis of
the species, show no sign of bifurcation of the hinder band on
the throat, while in some cases the two bands have almost run
into one large blotch. Pending the collection of further material
these specimens are at present assigned to this species. The
specimen figured is one in which the hinder band does not
bifurcate.
It may be remarked that specimens collected recently on
the south-eastern coasts of Africa indicate that a revision of the
African species of this genus is desirable, since certain diag-
nostic features employed for the delimitation of species appear
to be somewhat inconstant, and would, if maintained with
154 Smith.—New South African Fish.
material recently collected, involve an unnecessary multiplication
of species.
Further material is at present being collected with a view
to such revision.
FAMILY CLINIDAE.
Clinus agilis n. sp. (Pl. XVI.)
‘Klip-fish’ (South-west). ‘Rocky’ (Eastern coasts).
Body moderately elongate, compressed. Dorsal profile gently
curved from snout to base of anterior dorsal spines, with a slight
hump above the hind margin of the preopercle. Depth 4—5
length of head 34—4 in length of body. Eye 3—4 in head, 13
times snout, almost twice interorbital width.
Snout moderately sharp, sub-conical: very slight inter-
orbital prominence. A slight groove from snout to interorbital.
Two very shallow v-shaped grooves on occiput. Mucous pores on
head prominent. Cleft of mouth oblique: jaws sub-equal: maxilla
extends to below anterior third or centre of eye. A broad band
of small teeth in both jaws, outer row enlarged: a curved band
on vomer. A tentacle over the eye consisting of a flattish stalk
with 2—38 cirri at end: length varies from 2—3 in eye. Minute
nasal tentacles.
D XXXIV—XXXV, 3—4. Commences above hind margin of
preopercle. 1st, 3rd and 4th spines are shortest, subequal, 4—2
of eye: 2nd spine 14—-14 times Ist. First three spines widely
spaced, membrane deeply notched between 3rd and 4th spines.
Remaining spines gradually increase in length, the last spine
being 2—2i times the first. Membrane scarcely incised. An-
terior ray slightly longer than last spine: remaining rays gradu-
ated, last ray % of first in length, membrane joined to peduncle
at base of caudal.
A II, 21—24. 1st spine 3 of eye, 2nd spine 14 times as long
as the first. Rays graduated, first ray 3, last ray 2 in length of
head, ends project somewhat beyond membrane.
P, 12, slightly less than head.
V. I. 2-38, Inner (8rd) ray very small when present.
11
Smith—New South African Fish. 155
Caudal rounded, of length of head. Peduncle slender, twice
as long as deep.
Colour (alive). Mottled grey-green. Seven irregular darker
cross bands extending in some cases obliquely on to the base of
the dorsal. Narrow dark band at base of caudal. Dark patch on
nape. Head spotted. Dark spots on anal, pectoral and caudal,
fewer on dorsal. Occasionally irregular reddish blotches on dorsal
(males). Reddish tinge on posterior margin of opercle. Some-
times a black spot on membrane between Ist and 2nd dorsal
spines.
Locality. Knysna estuary. The types are seven specimens in
the Albany Museum collection ranging in length from 55 to 65
mm.
At Knysna this active and shy little fish lives in the sea-
grass on the mud-banks of the river and is captured with
difficulty.
The species is very close to acuminatus C. and V., but differs
chiefly in the dorsal fin formula and in the characters of the
anterior portion of the spinous dorsal.
Since our diagnosis of the species acuminatus is based
largely on specimens collected from the Cape Peninsula, described
by Gilchrist and Thompson (Ann. S.A. Mus. 1908, vol. VI, pt. 2,
p. 124), it is possible that with collection over wider limits, the
present species agilis may be shown to be a variety or sub-species
of acuminatus.
It may be noted here that I have found many species of
Clinus hitherto recorded only from about the Cape Peninsula,
occurring regularly along the coast as far east as East London:
of these, cottoides C. and V., dorsalis Blkr, and superciliosus
Linn. appear to be the most plentiful, while brachycephalus C.
and V., and capensis C. and V. are fairly common, being
especially plentiful in the rock-pools at and near East London:
anguillaris C. and V., striatus G. and T., mus G. and T., pavo
G. and T., brevicristatus G. and T., fucoruwm G. and T. and
ornatus G. and T. have also been found,
12
156 Smith—New South African Fish.
FAMILY SCORPAENIDAE.
Amblyapistus marleyi Regan.
Regan, Ann. Durban Mus., 1919, vol. II, pt. 4, p. 202. Text
fig. 5.
Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, vol. XXI, p. 917.
Depth 22, length of head 4 in length of body. Eye 3 in head,
twice interorbital and almost twice snout. Anterior profile of
head almost vertical, concave. Maxilla extends to below the
anterior third of the eye. Small villiform teeth on jaws, and in a
crescentic band on vomer. Palate edentulous. Nostrils tubular,
situated one above the other immediately before the lower margin
of the orbit; anterior covered by a plain flap. Gills 4, no slit
behind the fourth. Membranes free from the isthmus. Gill-
rakers reduced to mere knobs, 7 or 8 on the lower part of the
anterior arch.
Preorbital produced backwards into a strong spine, reaching
to below the posterior margin of the orbit; a smaller spine below
at the base of the larger. Four preopercular spines, the lower
three small and blunt, the upper larger, slightly less than the
preorbital spine, reaching to the opercular margin. Two spines
on the upper margin of the operculum, completely covered by
skin.
Lateral line almost straight, tubules 23. Rudimentary cycloid
scales, not imbricated, below the skin on the anterior parts of
the body, visible externally on the belly and peduncle. Skin
smooth and soft.
D XV, 8. lst spine short, subequal to eye, in advance of
anterior margin of orbit. 2nd and 3rd spines longest, subequal,
1} times length of head: bases of 2nd and 8rd spines apart by
an eye diameter, 14 times as far apart as bases of 3rd and 4th
spines. Membranes between 2nd and 8rd spines trapeziform,
widening upwards. 6th spine shortest, less than half length of
head, last spine 2 of 2nd spine. Membrane of soft dorsal joined
to the peduncle at the base of the caudal. 5th ray longest.
A III, 6. Commences below the 14th dorsal spine. Spines
graduated, fairly stout. lst spine shorter than, 3rd spine almost
twice, an eye diameter. Membrane of soft anal joined to the
13
Smith.—New South African Fish. 157
peduncle an eye diameter away from the base of the caudal.
3rd ray longest. P. 12. Rounded, reaches to above the 2nd anal
spine. V. I. 5, reaches to the hinder margin of the vent. Caudal
rounded, equal to head, rays 12.
Colour. Brown, marbled and spotted with darker. Several
dark blotches on the median fins. A light spot below the 9th
dorsal spine, just above the lateral line.
A single specimen, 147 mm. in length, from Mr, H. W. Bell
Marley, Durban.
Regan’s figure (loc. cit) shows neither the more or less
trapeziform membrane between the 2nd and 8rd dorsal spines,
nor the variation in the basal spacing of the anterior dorsal
spines. Regan distinguishes this species from taentonotus, C.
and V., by the greater length of the preorbital and upper pre-
opercular spines. Barnard (loc. cit) quotes the latter species as
having the 2nd and 3rd dorsal spines of the length of the
head, and uses. this in his key to the South African species of
the genus. Day (Fish of India, p. 157, pl. XX XVIII, fig. 5)
quotes the 2nd and 3rd dorsal spines of taenionotus as being
equal to the depth of the body, which his dimensions make to
correspond with about 1+ times the length of the head. His
figure (loc. cit) on the other hand shows these spines to be
2 of the length of the head. In view of this discrepancy, a re-
examination of the type of taenionotus appears desirable.
FAMILY SYNANCIIDAE.
Caracanthus zeylonicus Day.
1869. Day. Proc. Zool. Soc, p. 515 (Amphiprionichthys
zeylonicus ). |
1878. Day. Fish of India, p. 158. Pl. XXXVIII, fig. 6.
(Micropus zeylonicus) .
Body deep compressed. Dorsal profile elevated, snout steep,
blunt. Depth 2, length of head 21in length of body. Eye 4 in
length of head, 14 times interorbital width, slightly less than
snout. Interorbital space slightly convex, preorbital deep.
Mouth moderate, terminal, somewhat oblique. Small villi-
form teeth in bands on jaws only. Tongue small, adnate to floor
of mouth, Maxilla extends to below anterior third of eye. Nostrils
14
158 Smith—New South African Fish.
paired, tubular. Gills 4, no slit behind the fourth. Gill rakers
moderate, slender, 13 on lower limb of anterior arch. Gill mem-
branes united to the isthmus.
Pseudobranchiae present. Branchiostegals 5.
Preorbital produced into a laterally projecting spine, which
is directed downwards and backwards. Preopercle with five
spines, the upper pair small and blunt, the lower pair at the angle
enlarged and recurved. A similar stout spine on the interopercle;
subopercle with a blunt spine. One moderate and two very small
blunt spines on the opercle. A finely serrated ridge runs from
above the orbit along the nape. |
Arborescent muciferous canals on the head above the pre-
opercle.
D VII, 18. Deeply notched between the spinous and soft
portions. 1st spine minute, remaining spines increase in length
to the 4th, which is 13 times the diameter of the eye, then
decrease rapidly to the 7th, which is scarcely one third the
diameter of the eye. Rays articulated, branched. The first two
rays are subequal to the eye, the 3rd to the 9th almost twice as
long, while the remainder are shorter than the first ray.
A II, 11. Commences below the middle of the soft dorsal.
Spines minute, not externally visible. Rays articulated, branched,
subequal to eye. P. 13, rounded, rays articulated. Ventrals thor-
acic, reduced to a pair of spines scarcely visible.
Caudal rounded, rays articulated. Peduncle stout, deeper
than long. Lateral line a continuous tube with 13 single tubules
opening dorsally. The L. 1 follows the dorsal profile, and is
obsolescent on the anterior part of the caudal peduncle.
Scales absent, papillae on head and body, skin soft and
velvety.
Colour. Uniform dark brown, becoming lighter ventrally.
A single specimen, 37 mm. in length, from Great Fish Point.
This appears to be the first record from South Africa.
The species is recorded by Day (loc. cit.) as occurring at
Malabar and Ceylon, and its presence so far south is very inter-
esting. Further search will doubtless reveal its presence on the
eastern coasts of Africa.
15
Smith—New South African Fish. 159
FAMILY TETRODONTIDAE,
Tropidichthys oxylophius n. sp. (Pl. XVI.)
Body deep, moderately compressed. Dorsal profile elevated.
Snout concave. Profile strongly concave below chin. Back sharply
ridged with apex slightly nearer tip of snout than base of caudal.
Nostrils imperforate immediately before the orbit. Interorbital
space strongly concave. Moderately prominent ant-orbital ridge.
Depth 2, length of head 2 in length of body. Eye 34 in head,
equal to the interorbital width, slightly less than snout. Eye
midway between tip of snout and apex of ridge on back. Mouth
small: upper teeth projecting beyond lower. Teeth subequal.
Small 2-rooted spines which lie flat on the skin on most of head
and body. Head spinulose except post-orbital and chin. From
above and below centre of orbit, the anterior spines are directed
forwards and upwards: the posterior spines are directed mostly
backwards. Immediately before the orbit is a larger spine, 3
times as long as the others, directed upwards.
Most of the body is spinulose: no spines on the posterior
third of the body, on the peduncle, on a small area behind the
pectoral or on the top of the dorsal ridge from the apex to the
base of the dorsal fin. On the lower part of the body, the roots
of the spines are produced below the skin, giving this area a
somewhat reticulate appearance. Skin rugose.
D. 9, rays simple, well back, on posterior third of body.
A. 9, rays simple, commences below posterior margin of base
of dorsal. D. and A. subequal in length to diameter of eye.
P. 18, rays simple, equal to snout. Caudal rays 9, branched.
14 in length of head: subtruncate. :
Colour. Uniform dark brown above, uniform light orange
below. Slightly lighter ovate mark with light margin and with
a short white oblique line below base of dorsal. Extremely fine
dark lines running obliquely from eye to snout. Fins light yellow.
A single specimen 32 mm. in length from Kareiga river
mouth, near Port Alfred.
Type in the Albany Museum.
The occurrence of a species of this genus as far west as
Port Alfred is rather interesting, no other species having been
16
160 Smith—New South African Fish.
recorded south-west of Natal. It may be here noted that I have
found many species hitherto regarded as confined to the eastern
coasts of Africa extending regularly along the southern coast at
least as far west as Knysna.
The author desires to acknowledge gratefully financial
assistance received from the Carnegie Grant in aid of Research,
through the Research Grant Board of South Africa, which
defrayed part of the expenses incurred in the collection of
specimens.
Rec.: Albany Mus. Vol. IV | Plate XVI
Tropidichthys oxylophius n. sp. x 14.
Blewnius fascigula Barnard x 75.
Clinus agilis n. sp. x 17.
Synaptura barnardi n. sp. X yo.
17.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXt.
Part Il. pp. 125-127. Pl. IX. April, 1933.
AN INTERESTING NEW MYCTOPHID FISH FROM SOUTH
AFRICA.
By J. L. B. Smira.
(With Plate IX.)
Family MycTopPHIDAE.
Genus Myctophum Raf.
The subdivision of the numerous polymorphous species of this genus has
proved attractive, if somewhat troublesome. Goode and Bean (Ocean.
Ich., 1895, p. 71) proposed an elaborate scheme, which has little practical
or taxonomic value, since it is based mainly upon features which can have
but little natural significance in these fishes. A simple and more natural
scheme, based upon the nature and arrangement of the luminous organs,
in the form in which it has been suggested by Brauer (Zool. Anz., 1904,
vol. xxvili; Wiss. Erg. Deutsch. Tief-See Exp. Valdivia, 1906, vol. xv,
pt. 1) has been accepted by most systematists. Brauer considers that
there is but a single genus, Myctophum Raf., but recognises the four sub-
genera Myctophum Raf. s.s., Lampanyctus Bon., Diaphus Hig & Hig, and
Lampadena G. & B. -
Since all species hitherto discovered have fallen more or less satisfactorily
into one or other of the subgenera, these have acquired a possibly fictitious
taxonomic significance, and Parr (Bull. Bing. Oc. Coll., 1928, vol. in,
Art. 3, p. 49) has proposed the raising of the subgenera to full generic
rank. This may prove to be of doubtful value, since, not only is our
knowledge of these fishes far from complete, but renewed subdivision of
Lampanyctus and Diaphus is almost certain to be proposed.
The remarkable specimen described below does not fall within the
limits of any one of these proposed four genera, but would appear to call
in question the full generic distinction of Lampanyctus from Diraphus,
since it to some extent bridges the gap between them, but also possesses
certain features characteristic of neither. This would appear to involve
either renewed subdivision of Diaphus, or the institution of yet another
subgenus of the single wide genus Myctophum. The latter alternative
appears preferable, and is here adopted.
18
126 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Nasolychnus, new subgenus.
No luminous plates on peduncle. Luminous scales present or absent.
Antorbital organs enlarged, probably always continuous above and below
nostrils. Photophores circular, without dividing septum; five, or more
or less than five, precaudal. The two infrapectoral organs probably never
in line with the first pectoral organ. Spongy, probably luminous, tissue
between the ventral bases, not corresponding with the scale pockets.
Maxilla extending well behind eye, posteriorly dilated.
This subgenus is closely related to Diaphus, from which, however, it
differs in several features.
Myctophum (Nasolychnus) florenti n. sp.
Body elongate, moderately compressed, width 1-7 in depth. Dorsal
profile even, snout blunt, almost vertical before eye. Depth 5-1, length
of head 3-9 in length of body. Eye 4 in head, 1-8 times snout, 1-2 in
interorbital width, and 2-6 in the postorbital part of the head. Strong
median ridge on snout. Preopercle margin very oblique. Mouth large,
maxilla extends 1-7 times eye diameter behind eye, posteriorly dilated.
Minute teeth in both jaws and on palatines, pterygoids, and tongue: a few
rudimentary teeth on sides of vomer. Gill rakers 25, slender, 2 in eye.
D 19, commences above the ventrals, 5th ray longest, 1-7 in head, last
ray 4 in head. Edge of fin straight. Base of dorsal as long as head.
Adipose dorsal just behind end of anal base.
A 19, commences below the 14th dorsal ray, 5th ray longest, 2:1 in
head, last ray 6 in head, edge of fin gently concave. Base of anal 1-25 in
length of head.
P 12, inserted in lower third of side, 3-3 in head, does not reach to ventral
base. V 9, inserted twice as far from base of caudal as from centre of eye,
1-7 in head, reaches to vent. Caudal deeply forked, densely scaled.
Photophores circular, without dividing septum. (Brauer’s terminology
is hereemployed.) PLO much nearer lateral line than pectoral base. Upper
PVO above pectoral base, lower behind upper. The PLO and the two
PVO form an almost straight series with the 2nd (? 3rd, vide infra) PO.
5 PO, first twice as far from second as remainder from one another (there
may have been 6 PO, since on each side the scale behind the anterior PO
is missing, see figure). VLO twice as far from ventral base as from lateral
line. 5 VO in a gently curved series, 3rd highest. 4 SAO, the anterior
three forming a gently curved oblique series with the posterior VO. Upper
SAO in lateral line, forming a straight oblique series with posterior (4th)
SAO and first antero-AO. 7+9 AO. 2 Pol, upper almost in lateral line,
in a straight oblique series with last antero-AO. On one side 4+1 Pre,
19
An Interesting New Myctophid Fish from South Africa. 127
separate from AO, last separate, highest, just below end of lateral line:
on the other side there are 1 +2+1 Pre, the posterior as before, the remainder
being arranged 1+2, with two rudiments between. Branchiostegal organs
3, obscure. On one side 3 opercular organs, upper small ; lower two large,
contiguous or partly fused, expanded ventrally. Upper organ absent on
other side. Antorbital organs conspicuously enlarged, continuous above
and below nostrils. A cuneiform patch of white, probably luminous tissue
between ventral bases, about half eye diameter in length, not covered by
scales and not corresponding with the scaling. No luminous plates. No
true luminous scales, but most scales on the body and the top of the head
with a central irregularly shaped light patch, probably luminous. Dorsal
sheath scales mostly with central luminous patch. Edges of fontanel
white, probably luminous.
Scales cycloid, 1.1. tubes 46, 1.1. scales not enlarged, |.tr. 4 (from origin
of dorsal), about 15 predorsal, 4-5 scales on cheek.
Colour.—Uniform brown, antorbitals bright silvery. Photophores
opalescent with black tissue before and behind. Proximal third of ventrals
hight.
Length.—136 mm.
Type.—A ripe female, in the Albany Museum.
Locality —Bushman’s River, near Port Alfred, found on the shore by
Miss Florence Hewitt.
The photophores on the cheek, and the Prec, as indicated above, are not
the same on both sides. The 4+1 Pre is evidently normal, while the
1+2+1 on the right side is most probably not, since there are two rudi-
mentary or defective organs between the first and the second.
It is an open question whether the photophores here described as the
posterior (4th) SAO, and as the lower Pol, might not be regarded as the
first and the ninth antero-AO respectively, elevated above the rest. Since
the remaining AO are in two regular horizontal series, it appears preferable
to regard these others as belonging to the SAO and to the Pol respectively.
Considering that this remarkably large specimen was cast up by waves,
although some of the scales are missing, it is in a remarkable state of
preservation, so as to lead one to conclude that even a somewhat fragile
dividing septum, such as is present in Diaphus, would still be intact in
some of the photophores, had it originally been present.
The eggs are about 0-6 mm. in diameter, and are certainly exceedingly
numerous.
ALBANY MUSEUM,
GRAHAMSTOWN.
‘ds -u s2zuasoyf (snuyohjosp ay) wnydopoh W
Plate IX.
Neill & Co., Ltd.
tee
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. X XI.
J. L. B. Smith.
21.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXI.
Part Il. pp. 129-150. Pls. X—XII. April, 1933.
THE SOUTH AFRICAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS
HEMIRHAMPHUS CUV.
By J. L. B. Smira.
Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv.
(With Plates X-XII and one Text-figure.)
Cuvier, Reg. Anim., 1817, 11, p. 186.
Body elongate, subcylindrical or compressed. Lower jaw produced
into a long beak, with teeth only in the part opposite the edges of the
premaxillae. A cutaneous fringe from corner of mouth on each side to
apex of beak: a median bilobed sac expanded at origin below the chin,
tapering forward to below tip of beak. Premaxillae, fused with maxillae,
produced, forming a flattened triangular upper jaw, naked or scaly. Teeth
small, conical, bi- or tricuspid, in bands in both jaws. Ventrals abdominal, »
nearer to base of caudal than tip of upper jaw. Pectorals inserted above
middle of side, not longer than head. Dorsal originates far back, much
nearer base of caudal than base of pectoral. Caudal forked or emarginate,
the lower lobe longer. Scales cycloid, moderate or large, deciduous.
Lateral line ventro-lateral in position, commences on chest, ends before
base of caudal: a superior branch to pectoral base. Lateral line tubes
with few or many inferior tubules. Gull-openings wide, gill-rakers numerous,
well developed. Third upper pharyngeals fused. Air-bladder simple or
cellular. |
Subgenera of Hemirhamphus Cuv. have several times been proposed.
Gill (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1859, p. 131) instituted the genus Hyporham-
phus for species with ventrals inserted nearer head than caudal base, and
air-bladder simple. Fowler (‘‘ Fishes Oceania,’ Mem. B. P. Bishop Mus.,
1928, x, p. 75) has proposed the subgenus Rhynchorhamphus for species
with triangular part of upper jaw longer than wide, beak very long, and
ventrals nearer caudal base than head. To Hemirhamphus (s.s.) are then
assigned species with ventrals nearer caudal base than head, upper jaw
wider than long, and air-bladder cellular. |
The position of the ventrals appears to be a most unsatisfactory feature
‘on which to found an allied genus, or even a subgenus of Hemirhamphus,
22
130 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
for in the species we find regular variation of this position from midway
between caudal base and tip of pectoral to midway between caudal base
and eye, several species having the ventrals inserted exactly midway
between caudal base and head. The shape of the upper jaw and the
length of the beak have little to recommend them as features for a similar
purpose, since it is shown in the present work that these vary considerably
with the growth of the fish.
The South African species alone show the doubtful utility of the sub-
genera as defined above: delagoae Brurd. has the simple air-bladder of
Hyporhamphus, but the ventrals inserted as in Hemirhamphus ; knysnaensis
n. sp. has the ventrals inserted midway between caudal base and head,
thus falling midway between Hypohamphus and Hemirhamphus, the
triangular part of the upper jaw in adults longer than wide, as in Rhyncho-
rhamphus, but the beak is not very long, while the juvenile stages have the
upper jaw wider than long, or as wide as long, according to the stage of
growth.
I cannot therefore accept the present forms in which the above sub-
genera appear.
Generic subdivision may more sharply and with greater justification
be based upon other features, such as the presence or absence of scales on
the triangular part of the upper Jaw, which is constant at all stages, or upon
the nature of the growth changes observed during the early and mid-
Juvenile stages. As will be seen below, these stadia of far Forsk. show
primary increase in the relative length of the ventrals, followed by recession,
together with very considerable changes in the shape of the dorsal fin. In
knysnaensis n. sp., on the other hand, no such changes with growth are
observed ; further, the triangular part of the upper jaw of knysnaensis is
scaly, but naked in far. These two species may be regarded as sub-
generically distinct, but until complete information on these points is
available it would appear inadvisable to subdivide Hemirhamphus Cuv.,
and I do not here propose to attempt such a step, since it would serve no
useful purpose as far as the South African species are concerned.
The South African species have received somewhat scant attention,
and stood in need of critical revision. -Two new species, knysnaensis and
wmprovisus, are here described, and balinensis Blkr., which has not previously
been recorded from our region, is now included. |
Two species, marginatus Forsk. and schlegeli Blkr., which have been
recorded from the neighbourhood of, but not strictly within the limits
of, our region (after Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, xxi, p. 4, south of
Mossamedes, west coast, and of Mozambique, east coast), are included,
since with more intensive collection they are sure to be discovered here.
In South Africa the species of Hemirhamphus are generally known as
23
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 131
‘“ Naald-vis ” or “ Needle-fish,” also as ‘‘ Half-beaks.’’? They are of little
or no economic significance, most of them being rather small and seldom
taken in number. far is occasionally taken in moderate numbers by
dragnets in the summer months, but is not generally in demand as a food-
fish.
Terms employed in the Descriptions.
Since the beak and the caudal fin of preserved specimens are frequently
damaged, the dimensional relationships are not here stated in total length
only. The following limits are employed :—
Length of Body.—Measured from caudal base (v.i.) to tip of triangular
part of upper jaw. |
Length of Head.—Measured from hind margin of operculum to tip of
upper jaw.
Length of Beak.—Measured from below tip of upper jaw to apex of
beak.
Base of Caudal.—This is taken as the base of the mid-caudal rays,
generally obscured by scales.
Lateral Rows of Scales.—Counted from above the hind margin of the
operculum to caudal base, not including scales extending on to the caudal
rays.
Lateral Line.—F¥igures indicate the number of scales bearing tubules,
and the count is taken as follows, e.g. 5007098’ which indicates 4 from
pectoral base down to junction, 2 from chest to junction, 27 from junction
to ventral base, and 28 posteriorly from ventral base.
Key to the South African Species.
A. Upper jaw naked. Ventrals nearer base of caudal than base of pectoral.
1. Black blotches on side. Body subquadrangular in cross-section, not very
compressed . . . . . . . . . . . far.
2. No blotches on side. Body fairly compressed. . . . marginatus.
B. Upper jaw scaly. Ventrals inserted midway between base of caudal and base of
pectoral, or nearer the latter.
1. Mid-caudal rays not longer than eye. Caudal deeply forked. Dorsal scaly.
a. 50-52 lateral rows of scales.
Pectoral and ventral not scaly . . . . . . dussumiert.
b. 58-61 lateral rows of scales.
Pectoral and ventral scaly.
i. Beak 6:3 in total length. Preorbital 1-3 times longer than deep, not
as long as eye . . . delagoae.
ii. Beak 4-5 in total length. “Preorbital 1. 8-1: 9 times longer than deep,
as long as eye . . . . . . . balinensis.
24
132 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
2. Mid-caudal rays longer than eye. Caudal emarginate. Dorsal not scaly.
a. Ventrals nearer hind margin of preopercle than base of caudal. Upper jaw
wider than long, with 3-4 transverse series of scales, middle series over
median ridge improvisus.
6. Ventrals nearer base of caudal than hind margin of preopercle. Upper
jaw not wider than long, with 2 transverse series of scales, median
ridge not covered by scales.
i. Upper jaw longer than wide. 55-58 lateral rows of scales. South
and east coasts . knysnaensis.
ii. Upper jaw: as wide as long. 50-53 ‘lateral rows of scales. West
coast schlegelt.
Hemirhamphus far Forsk.
(Plate XII, fig. 1.)
1853. Bleeker, Nat. T¥dschr. Ned. Ind., v, p. 89 (fasciatus).
1866. Bleeker, Atlas Ich., vi, p. 54, pl. vi, fig. 3.
1878. Day, Fishes of India, p. 516, pl. cxx, fig. 3.
1908. Gilchrist, Ann. S.A. Mus., vi, p. 266 (commerson1).
1913. Weber, Siboga-Exp. Fische, p. 131 (fasczatus).
1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fishes Indo-Aus. Arch., iv, p. 157, fig. 55
and p. 158 (marginatus, juvenile = fasciatus Blkr.).
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., xxi, p. 262.
Adults.
Body elongate, robust, width 1-3-1-5 in depth. Sides scarcely convex,
form, with almost flat ventral surface, a right-angled ventro-lateral edge.
Depth 6-8, length of head 4-3-5-3, in length of body. Lower jaw
3-3°5 in body, 4-4-5 in total length. Eye 4-4-4 in head, 1-2-1-5 in
snout, 1-6—1-8 in postorbital part of head, and 1-1-1-5 in interorbital width.
Width of snout before eyes § of its length. Head slightly depressed,
interorbital gently convex, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves. Top of
head scaly to above nostrils. A slight medio-longitudinal ridge on the
triangular part of the upper jaw, which latter is thick and fleshy, scaleless,
and 1-3-1-9 times as wide as long. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout
almost an eye diameter. Fairly stout tricuspid teeth in 3-4 rows in lower
and 2-3 rows in upper jaw. Beak stout, cutaneous fringes about half the
width of the beak: subgular sac prominent. Preorbital 1-3 times deeper
than long, depth about half-eye diameter; covered by a single scale.
Opercle with one large and two smaller scales. A single series of scales
on the cheek, extending forward to below the corner of the mouth.
Gill-rakers 20-23, fairly stout, 3-5 in gill-filaments which are 1-5 in eye.
Branchiostegals 12-13, membrane and mentum scaleless.
25
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 133
D 13-14, arises twice as far from base of caudal as from base of ventral.
Anterior rays elevated, 3rd longest 1-7-1-9 in head, remainder decrease
rapidly to the penultimate, which is about 9 in head, the fin having a
deeply concave edge. The last ray is elongate, about 5 in head, with hinder
branch free from membrane. Anterior. fourth of fin densely scaled.
A 10-13, commences below the 6th or 7th dorsal ray. Anterior rays
elevated, 3rd longest 2-5 in head, remainder decrease to the penultimate,
which is about 9 in head, the fin having a gently concave edge. The
hinder branch of the last ray is slightly longer than the preceding rays.
Anterior third of fin densely scaled. Base of anal 1-6-2 in length of base
of dorsal (rarely more than 1:8).
P 12, 1-3-1-7 in head, scaleless.
V 6, scaleless, 2-2—2-8 in head, inserted midway between base of caudal
and almost the tip to distal fourth of pectoral. 1st and last rays longest,
subequal, inner four rays graduated, shorter than Ist and last; last ray
about 1-3 times the length of the penultimate.
Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe shorter, 1-3-1-4 in length of lower ;
mid rays shorter than or equal to eye.
Peduncle fairly robust.
Air-bladder cellular.
Scales.—Lateral rows 55-58, 1.1. , predorsal 37-39,
3 +26 — 27 +21 — 22
6-7 between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes highly arborescent
ventrally (Plate X, A), more elaborated in anterior scales.
Colour.—Blue-green above, silvery below, dorsal scales light, with dark
margin; opercle bronzy. Beak and membranes black, tip of beak red.
A silvery-plumbeous stripe with blue upper margin from base of caudal
along side curving gently over pectoral base and ending on shoulder:
widest midway. 4-10 more or less distinct dusky blotches on side chiefly
above lateral stripe. Dorsal, most of caudal, anterior part of anal, and
ventrals, except last ray, dusky. Pectorals light. Ripe fishes usually have
reddish blotches on the abdomen.
Length.—200-533 mm.
Locality. Eastwards from False Bay, entering tidal rivers from Breede
River, Port Beaufort to the Zambesi River, Rhodesia, occurring even in the
Mazoe River, a tributary of the Zambesi, in fresh water miles from the coast.
Distribution.—Almost circumtropical.
Juveniles.
. Very young specimens show considerable divergence from the adult
form chiefly in the size and shape of the fins and of the jaws. The following
26
134 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
table indicates certain of the features of change with the growth of
the fish :—
Ee nnn Tn inteal SanEEEEE SERaEISDT SEnSnissAttesn nnn ea a SS iE: as
Total length (mm.) . 12| 18 | 24 | 33 | 53 | 60 | 72 | 115) 135] 195) 295 | 533
Depth in body . .|>10|>10/ 10 |10}9 |9 {9 {84)8 18 | 7 | 65
Head in body . . lea. 4 loa. 4 | 4:5 | 4:5) 4:5] 4:5 | 4:8 | 4-8] 4-8) 4:3 | 4-5 | 4-9
Beak in total length . |None |ca. 20] 9 6 |5 |45] 48144) 44] 4:3] 461 5-0
Triangular upper jaw,
wide as long . . | .. lea. 7 jea. 7 Ica. Tica. Sica. 5) 4 | 2-5 | 2-5] 2-0] 1-4} 1-4
Eye in head . . lea. 2 |ca.2-5} 3 13 | 3-2} 3:3/3-3)3-5/3-7)4 | 4 | 43
Eye in snout. . .. |cea.0-4/ca.0°5| 0-6 | 0-7 | 0-8 | O-B | 1-1] 1-1] Ld | 14] 15
Eye in postorbital part
head. . . ca.1-3) 1-5 | 1-6} 1-5 | 1-7) 1-7] 1-7) 1-7) 1-7] 1-7) 1:8
Pectoral in head . jea.l-5jca.1-5} 15 | 1:5) 1-4) 1-4) 1-4] 1-4] 1-4] 1-6) 1-4) 1-7
Ventral in head . . joa. 4 joa. 3 | 2:0 | 1-8) 1-6] 1-6] 1-7] 1-5] 1-6] 2:0) 2-4] 2:8
Upper caudal lobe in
lower. . . jea.l-O} 1-1 | 1-2 | 1:6] 1-8] 1-6] 1-6) 1-7) 1:5] 1-4) 1-4) 1:3
Shortest caudal rays
ineye . . . |ca.0-5| 0-7 | 0-7 | 0-8] 0-8 | 0-8 | 0-9 | 0-9} 0-9] 1:0) 1-1) 11
Features which do not change appreciably with growth are the shape
of the anal fin and the relative size and shape of the pectorals.
The Mouth and Jaws.
There is no prolongation of the lower jaw in fishes not exceeding 15 mm.
in length: the adult proportions are attained when the total length is
50-60 mm. Fishes 100-200 mm. in length have relatively longer beaks
than larger examples. (See above table.) The mouth is at first almost
vertical and changes to nearly horizontal with the growth of the upper jaw,
which commences only when the lower jaw is fully prolonged. Very young
fishes have a single row of teeth, many of which are conical, though tricuspid
teeth are observed at all stages: the number of rows increases with age.
Ventral Fins.
In very small fishes the ventrals are inserted midway between the base
of the caudal and the middle to distal third of the pectoral. The point
of insertion moves somewhat towards the caudal with growth of the fish.
The ventrals are fairly small in the youngest stadia, increase in relative
length until the fish is about 100 mm. in length, and thereafter decrease.
In specimens 50-120 mm. in length the ventrals reach the base of the anal
or beyond. The shape of the fin also undergoes modification: in fishes
not longer than 60 mm. they resemble in shape that of the ventrals in an
adult of the Exocoetid genus Cypsilurus Swnsn.: the 3rd ray longest,
Ist shortest, 6th intermediate between lst and 3rd, remainder graduated :
the distal third of the fin being subacutely triangular in shape. With
27
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 135
growth of the fish, the Ist, 5th, and 6th rays increase in relative length,
while the 3rd becomes shorter, so that when the fish is about 200 mm. in
length, the 5th ray is longest, the 4th and 6th slightly shorter, subequal,
Ist ray shortest. Further growth results in the change to the adult form |
in which the Ist and 6th rays are longest, subequal, the 2nd ray shortest,
edge of fin concave.
Dorsal Fin.
When the length of the fish does not exceed 50 mm. the posterior
dorsal rays are about twice as long as the anterior, and when laid back
reach on to the caudal: the edge of the fin is straight. The relative length
of the rays changes with growth: at about 100 mm. total length the
anterior and posterior rays are subequal, the mid rays shorter, the anterior
margin of the fin being concave: at about 150 mm. the anterior rays are
1-5 times the posterior, and the anterior part of the fin has the subfalcate
shape of that of the adult. The posterior rays laid back no longer reach
to the caudal. When the fish is about 200 mm. in length the shape of the
fin approximates to that of the adult.
Coloration.
Very small fishes (35 mm.) are dusky green, with dendritic specks
uniformly distributed over the body, approximating anteriorly to the
scaling. Beyond this stage faint cross-bars appear, and with growth
increase in density. In fishes exceeding 50 mm. in length there are 10
cross-bars on the body, one across the base of the caudal rays and a wide
blotch over the distal portion of the lower caudal lobe: the caudal bars
and the ventral portion of the bars on the side are rust-red in colour.
The cross-bars on the body are prominent in fishes of 60-200 mm. in length,
the ventral portion, and the caudal bars fading with growth.
In all but the smallest specimens the ventrals are black, the pigmentation
retreating somewhat distally with growth, while the first ray becomes light.
The dorsal and anal are at first almost wholly dark, the pigmented area
retreating distally with growth, until in larger specimens the anterior
part of each fin and a broad marginal band only are dark. The pectorals
are uniformly unpigmented. The lateral stripe is not visible in specimens
of less than 30 mm. total length. Fishes 50-100 mm. in length frequently
have dark blue spots on the head. Beak and membranes black: tip of
beak red in advance of mid-juvenile stage.
H. fasciatus Blkr. is undoubtedly the juvenile form of far. Weber and
de Beaufort’s diagnosis (loc. cit.) of fasciatus as juvenile margenatus Forsk.
was evidently based upon the relative lengths of the bases of the anal
and dorsal fins, which these authors state to be in far base anal 2 in base
VOL. XXI, PART II. 10
28
136 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
dorsal, and 1-5-1-7 in marginatus. In our specimens of far, the base
of the anal is usually 1-6-1-8 in the length of the base of the dorsal,
occasional specimens showing 1-8-2. Our specimens show also further
divergence from the usual diagnosis of far: the last ray of the ventrals
and of the dorsal are elongate, longer than the penultimate ; the number
of scales in lateral series and the number of predorsal scales are greater :
the anterior portion of the dorsal is more subfalcate in shape, while the
body is not as deep nor the head as long as in specimens from other areas.
It may be noted that the figures of Day (loc. cit.) and of Weber and de
Beaufort (loc. cit.) are not strictly in accordance with the respective
descriptions, while none of our specimens have the markedly fusiform
body indicated in these figures, but are deepest across the middle of the
pectorals, even fully ripe fishes.
I have examined several specimens from the Indo-Pacific and find
that they have the base of the anal 1-8-2 in length of dorsal base and
51-55 lateral rows of scales. From the nature of the other features men-
tioned above, it would appear that most descriptions of far have been
based upon old, preserved, and possibly damaged specimens.
Breeding Habits, Etc.
In the Knysna and neighbouring rivers specimens of far are first
observed early in October, all ripe adults. The numbers increase rapidly,
attaining a maximum in December and January. Ripe and spent adults
are found until March, after which only a very occasional specimen is
encountered, and none are present after the end of March. The young
appear in November, become exceedingly abundant by January, and
disappear entirely by March.
The eggs of far are demersal, 2-95-3-1 mm. in diameter, translucent,
and provided with numerous glutinous filaments not longer than the
diameter of the egg. The larger females produce about 12,000 eggs per
season at Knysna. The breeding fishes, which appear to travel even
beyond the tidal area in the rivers, congregate in shallow water over
grassy banks, where two or more may frequently be seen slowly circling
over a restricted area. In one case, two specimens so engaged were
captured, and on examination, one, the larger, proved to be a ripe female,
and the other a ripe male. |
H. far may also be taken by allowing a fine line, baited with a small
“shrimp ” or “ mud-prawn,” to drift in the surface of the water: these
larger specimens are exceedingly lively and provide most excellent sport
on light tackle. The flesh is of fine texture and flavour, but is not gener-
ally esteemed on account of the presence of numerous fine bones.
29
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 137
Hemirhamphus marginatus Forsk.
1775. Forskal, Descr. Anim., p. 67.
1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fishes Indo-Aus. Archip., iv, p. 157.
1928. Fowler, “ Fishes Oceania,’ Mem. B. P. Bishop Mus,, x, p. 78
(record only).
Body fairly compressed, width 2-3 in depth. Depth 5-3-6-5, length
of head 3-7-4-2, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-3-3-5 in body, 4:5-5-1 in
total length. Eye 3-8 in head, 1-3 in snout, 1-4-1-7 in postorbital part of
head, and equal to or slightly greater than interorbital width. Head
slightly depressed, interorbital gently convex, with 2 shallow longitudinal
grooves. A slight medio-longitudinal ridge on the triangular part of the
upper jaw, which latter is more convex above than in other species, and
1-3-1-5 times as wide as long, scaleless. Width of lower jaw below tip
of snout slightly more than half an eye diameter. Tricuspid teeth in
2 rows in upper and 3-4 rows in lower jaw. Beak slender. Preorbital
1-2 times longer than deep, # eye diameter in length. Single series of
scales on cheek.
Gill-rakers 23, 2-3 in gill-filaments, which are 1-6 in eye.
D 13-14, arises 1-5-2 times as far from base of caudal as from base of
ventral. Anterior rays elevated, about 1-9 in head, edge of fin deeply
concave. Densely scaled anteriorly. |
A 10-13, commences below the 6th dorsal ray. Anterior rays elevated,
about 3 in head, edge of fin concave, last ray elongate. Scaly anteriorly.
Base of anal 1-5-1-7 in length of base of dorsal.
P 11, 1-2—1-3 in head, scaleless.
V 6, scaleless, 2-6 in head, inserted midway between base of caudal
and distal third of pectoral, first and last rays longest, subequal.
Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe shorter, 1-3 in length of lower; mid
rays shorter than eye. Air-bladder at least partly cellular.
3-4
Scales.—Lateral rows 53-56, 1.1. 5349799. LL? predorsal 34-38,
6 between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes arborescent ven-
trally. Arborescent muciferous canals on scales of head in some specimens.
Colour.—Blue-green above, silvery below. Plumbeous lateral stripe
curving up over pectoral base. Beak and membranes black. Dorsal
dusky, dark anteriorly. Caudal dusky, darker marginally. Pectorals
and ventrals light.
Length.—Up to 350 mm.
Locality.—Gold Coast.
Distribution.—Almost circumtropical.
This species has not yet been recorded from within our area, but is
30
138 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
sure to be discovered on our eastern coast. I have examined specimens
from the Indo-Pacific, and one specimen, loaned by the British Museum,
from Accra. It is very closely related to far, from which it differs in the
absence of the lateral blotches as well as in the highly compressed body,
in the narrower interorbital, and in the fairly convex upper surface of the
upper Jaw.
Hemirhamphus dussumeri C. and V.
1846. Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., xix, p. 33.
1925. Fowler, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., lxxvu, p. 203.
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., xxi, p. 263.
Body elongate, subcylindrical. Depth 9, head 4:5, in length of body.
(Lower jaw 4-5-5 in body, 5-6-3 in total length.) Eye 4 in head, 1-5 in
snout, 1-5 in postorbital part of the head, slightly less than interorbital
width (slightly less than or equal to interorbital). Width of snout before
eye # of its length. Head moderately depressed, interorbital flat, scaled,
three transverse series. A medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of
upper jaw, which is 1-3 times as wide as long, scaly, 5 longitudinal and 3
transverse series of scales. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout 3 of
eye diameter. Small tricuspid teeth in fairly wide bands in both jaws.
Beak stout, cutaneous fringes narrow, subgular sac small. Preorbital
1-5 times longer than deep, covered by a single scale. Two series of scales
on cheek, scaling extends forward to below tip of snout. A single line of
pores on chin. Opercle naked, scales evidently fallen off.
Gill-rakers 28, 3 in gill-filaments, which are 1-5 in eye.
D 15 (14-16), commences slightly nearer base of ventral than base of
caudal. Anterior rays elevated, almost 3 in head; remainder decrease,
edge of fin concave. Fin scaly.
A 15 (13-15), commences below the third dorsal ray. Similar in shape
to dorsal. Fin scaly. Base of anal slightly less than base of dorsal.
P 11, 2 in head, not scaly.
V 6, not scaly, 3-3 in head, inserted midway between base of caudal
and centre of opercle.
Caudal deeply forked, lower lobe longer. Mid rays 3 of eye diameter.
Air-bladder simple.
Scales.—Lateral rows 52 (50-52), lateral line , predorsal 33
3
3 +22 +427
(32-34), 6 scales between dorsal and lateral line.
Colour (preserved).—Light brown, evidently bright green-blue above,
silvery below. Fins light. Numerous close-set blue spots on head and
snout and in a mid dorsal line to the origin of the dorsal.
Length.—Up to 300 mm.
31
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 189
Distribution.—East coast of Africa, Indo-Pacific.
I have seen only one specimen of this species, from Aden, lent by the
British Museum.
It would appear that a revision of this species is highly necessary, for
not only do descriptions vary rather widely, but authors differ in the
nominal species admitted as synonyms.
Day (Fishes of India, 1878, p. 515) includes dussumiert, described by
Bleeker (Atl. Ich., 1866, vi, p. 56) in the synonymy of reynaldi C. & V.
This is accepted by Weber and de Beaufort (Fishes Indo-Aus. Arch.,
1922, iv, p. 155), who consider both synonyms of dussumieri C. & V., and
who somewhat arbitrarily admit erythrorinchus le Sueur to the synonymy of
dussumiert C. & V., but do not give expression to the admitted priority of
the former name. Fowler (“ Fishes Oceania,” suppl., 1931, p. 319) considers
dussumert C. & V. a synonym of erythrorinchus le 8.
Klunzinger (“ Fische Rothe Meer,’ Verh. Zoo. Bot. Ges. Wien, 1871,
p. 584) gives a description of dussumiert C. & V. which does not agree with
many other descriptions of this species, as indicated by Day (loc. cit.),
whereas Weber and de Beaufort accept it as dussumiert C. & V.
In my opinion, many specimens of erythrorinchus le 8. have been
described as dussumiert C. & V., but it would appear that this latter species
may well be maintained as distinct from the former, provisionally differ-
entiated by the presence of scales on the dorsal and anal fins, postorbital
part of head more than 1-4 times eye, mid-caudal rays less than eye, and
ventrals nearer head than caudal base.
Fowler’s Delagoa Bay specimens (loc. cit.) are most probably dussumiert
C. & V. (as here defined), although this author states the relation of neither
the postorbital part of the head, nor of the mid-caudal rays, to the eye,
while his specimens have D 13, and only 18 gill-rakers on the lower part
of the anterior arch.
In so far as I am able to determine, erythrorinchus le 8. does not fall
within or near our area.
Hemirhamphus delagoae Brnrd.
(Plate XII, fig. 2.)
1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., xxi, pl. x, fig. 6.
Body elongate, slightly compressed, sides scarcely convex. Width
1-25 in depth.
Depth 10, length of head 4-8, in length of body. Lower jaw 4-9 in
body, 6-3 in total length. ©
Eye 3-8 in head, 1-4 in snout and in postorbital part of the head, slightly
greater than the interorbital width. Width of snout before the eyes
32
140 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
about % of its length. Head depressed, indications of scales on occiput.
Slight medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which
latter is twice as wide as long, scaly, 4-5 longitudinal and 3-4 transverse
series of scales. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout about § of eye
diameter. |
Uni-, bi-, and tricuspid teeth present in anteriorly tapering bands,
in 3-5 rows in each jaw, inner teeth mostly tricuspid, outer mostly uni-
cuspid. Beak stout, cutaneous fringes 4-} as wide as beak; subgular
sac moderate. Preorbital 1-3 times longer than deep, length 1-6 in eye,
covered by a single scale with 2 central-branched pores. Three large
scales with branched pores on opercle. 3-4 series of scales on cheek,
scaling extends forwards to below the tip of the snout.
Gill-rakers 24, moderately slender, 1:3 in gill-filaments which are
3 in eye. Branchiostegals 12, membrane scaly. Mentum broad and
densely scaled to symphysis, about 20 longitudinal and 4 transverse series
of scales.
D 15, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of caudal
and ventral. Anterior rays elevated, 2-2 in head; remainder decrease,
edge of fin concave. Densely scaled, heaviest anteriorly.
A 16, commences below the 2nd dorsal ray. Shape similar to dorsal,
anterior rays about 2-5 in head. Densely scaled. Base of anal 1-25 in
base of dorsal.
P 12, 1-8 in head. Base densely scaled, scaling extends over half the
length of the fin.
V 6, scaled, densely on basal portion, length 3in head. Inserted midway
between base of caudal and base of pectoral. Anterior rays longest, last
slightly longer than penultimate. Edge of fin concave. Caudal deeply
forked, upper lobe 1-3 in lower. Mid rays slightly less than eye. Peduncle
fairly stout.
Air-bladder simple.
4
Scales.—Lateral rows 61, 1.1. 2597 098° predorsal 40, 6 rows between
dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with numerous inferior tubules
(Plate X, C).
Colour.—Greenish-blue above, silvery below. Nape, occiput, snout,
and opercle dusky. Lower jaw and membranes black, tip of beak red. A
narrow plumbeous lateral stripe from the base of the caudal to axil of
pectoral, widest below origin of dorsal. Anterior dorsal rays dusky, remain-
ing fins light.
Length.—295 mm.
Locality —Delagoa Bay.
Lype.—In the South African Museum (No. 12303).
33
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 141
The original description is inaccurate in many particulars, nor does the
figure agree with the description.
This species is very closely related to balinensis Blkr., but differs in the
shorter beak, in the size and shape of the preorbital, and in the much wider
upper jaw. The eye is relatively larger in delagoae than in balinensis. It
ig an open question whether these differences alone justify the maintenance
of delagoae as distinct from balinensis, the shorter beak of the former species
being the only difference of note.
Fowler (Ann. Nat. Mus., vi, pt. 2, p. 250) considers that delagoae is
identical with unifasciatus Ranz. The errors in the original description
have evidently misled Fowler, for delagoae is well differentiated from
unifasciatus by the position of the ventrals alone.
Hemirhamphus balinensis Blkr.
1858. Bleeker, Nat. Tydschr. Ned. Ind., xvu, p. 170.
1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fishes Indo-Aus. Arch., iv, p. 152.
Body moderately compressed, width about 2 in depth. Depth 9-10,
length of head 4:5, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-4 in body, 4-8-4-9 in
total length. Eye 4:5 in head, 1-5-1-6 in snout, 1-6-1-9 in postorbital
part of head, equal to the interorbital width. Width of snout before the
eyes % of its length. Head depressed, occiput scaly. Slight medio-
longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is 1-1-1-:3
times as broad as long, scaly, 4-5 longitudinal and 3-4 transverse series
of scales. Bi- and tricuspid teeth present in anteriorly tapering bands,
in 3-4 rows in each jaw. Beak slender, cutaneous fringes narrow, subgular
sac moderate. Preorbital 1-8-1-9 times as long as deep, as long as eye,
covered by a single scale with 2 central pores. 2-3 series of scales on
cheek, scaling extends forwards along sides of beak almost half-length of
beak. Gill-rakers 22-26, slender, 2 in gill-filaments, which are about 2 in
eye. Branchiostegals 12, membrane scaly. Mentum moderate, densely
scaled to symphysis, about 20 longitudinal and 4 transverse series of scales.
D 15-16, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of
caudal and ventral. Anterior rays elevated, about 3 in head, remainder
decrease to the penultimate, last ray elongate. Edge of fin concave.
‘Densely scaled, anteriorly.
A 16-18, commences below the 2nd dorsal ray. Shape similar to—
dorsal. Densely scaled. Base of anal as long as base of dorsal.
P 12, base scaly. V 6, 3-5 in head, inserted midway between caudal
base and hind margin to middle of opercle. Edge of fin concave. Base
scaly. Caudal deeply forked, mid rays as long as eye, lower lobe longer.
Air-bladder simple. |
34
142 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
3 |
— _ |, _—__———_,, predorsal 39-41,
Scales.—Lateral rows 61-64, | 3098-99 428-99 p
6 between dorsal and 11. Lateral line tubes with numerous inferior
tubules, resemble closely those of delagoae (see Plate X, C).
Colour (preserved).—Brown, darker above. Narrow dark stripe from
base of caudal to axil of pectoral. Fins light.
Length.—Up to 220 mm.
Locality.—Mombasa.
Distribution.—Indo-Pacific.
The inclusion of this species in our fauna-list is based upon a specimen,
lent by the British Museum, labelled dussumiert C. & V. from Mombasa.
This specimen agrees generally with the diagnosis of balinensis Blkr., but
differs in the rather light scaling on the vertical fins. Circumstances
prevented a comparison of this specimen with two specimens of balinensis
Blkr. subsequently kindly presented by Dr. de Beaufort, but there is little
doubt that the Mombasa specimen is conspecific. The above description
is based chiefly upon the two Indo-Pacific specimens.
Hemirhamphus improvisus n. sp.
(Plate XI, fig. 1.)
Body elongate, robust, slightly compressed, sides slightly convex,
width 1-3in depth. Depth 8:5, length of head 4-5, in length of body. Lower
jaw 3-4 in body, 5 in total length. Eye 3-9 in head, 1-6 in snout, and in
postorbital part of the head, 1-2 in interorbital width. Width of snout
before the eyes 1:5 in length of snout. Head depressed, interorbital flat,
with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves. No scales on occiput or interorbital,
but these may have fallen off. Scarcely perceptible medio-longitudinal
ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is slightly broader than
long, scaly (fig. 1, B), 6-7 longitudinal and 3 or 4 transverse series : scaling
extends over medio-longitudinal ridge. Width of lower jaw below tip of
snout § diameter of eye.
Tricuspid teeth in 5-6 rows in lower, and in 6-7 rows in upper jaw.
Beak fairly stout, cutaneous fringes half as wide as beak; subgular sac
moderate. Preorbital deeper than long, depth 1-8 in eye, a central pore.
indicating a scale, evidently fallen off. 2 large and 1 small scales on
opercle. 2-3 series of scales on cheek, scaling extending forward on man-
dible to below middle of upper jaw. Gill-rakers 20, slender, 1-5 in gill-
filaments, which are about 2 in eye. Branchiostegals 10: membrane
naked ; mentum narrow, naked.
D 14, arises very slightly in advance of midway between bases of caudal
35
Lhe South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 143
and ventral. Anterior rays elevated, 4th longest about 2 in head; re-
mainder decrease, edge of fin concave. Scaleless.
A 15, arises below 2nd dorsal ray. Similar in shape to dorsal, anterior
rays slightly longer than longest dorsal rays. Fin scaly anteriorly and
along base. Base of anal 1-2 in base of dorsal.
P 18, not scaled, 1-5 in head.
V 6, not scaled, length 2-6 in head, 2nd ray longest, Ist and 3rd equal,
remainder decrease. Inserted midway between base of caudal and middle
Fia. 1.—Diagram to show type of scaling on upper jaws of A. H emirhamphus knysnaensis
n. sp. and B. Hemirhamphus improvisus n. sp.
of preopercle. Caudal slightly emarginate, mid rays 2-5 times eye. Lower
lobe slightly longer than upper. Peduncle moderately slender.
Air-bladder simple.
Scales.—Lateral rows 53, Ll. _ 4 predorsal 38, 6 rows between
2 +22 + 25
dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with 2-4 inferior tubules.
Colour.—Greenish above, silvery below. Nape, occiput snout, and top
of opercle dark. Lower jaw and membranes black, tip of beak red.
Median fins with dusky margins. A faint blotch on upper middle caudal
rays. Remaining fins light. A silvery lateral stripe with dark upper
border from base of caudal to axil of pectoral.
Length.—218 mm.
Locality.—Delagoa Bay.
Type in the South African Museum (No. 16368).
H. improvisus is closely related to schlegeli Blkr. and to knysnaensis
n. sp., but is sharply distinguished from these by the character of the
scaling on the triangular part of the upper jaw. In improvisus the middle
of the 3 longitudinal series of scales is disposed centrally over the median
ridge on the upper jaw, while the other two species have only 2 longitudinal
series of scales which do not cover the median ridge (fig. 1, A and B).
36
144 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
H. improvisus is further distinguished from schlegeli and knysnaensvs by
the more anterior position of the ventrals and by the more obtuse upper
jaw. The interorbital is markedly wider and the dorsal fin originates
further back in improvisus than in schlegeli or knysnaensis.
Hemirhamphus knysnaensts n. sp.
(Plate XI, fig. 2.)
1916. Thompson, Mar. Bio. Rep., ili, p. 266 (calabaricus).
1925. Barnard, Ann. §.A. Mus., xxi, p. 262 (calabaricus part).
1929. Fowler, Ann. Nat. Mus., vi, pt. 2, p. 250 (unifasciatus).
Adults.
Body elongate, slender, slightly compressed, about 14 times as deep as
wide. Depth 9-3-10-9, length of head 4-3-5, in total length. Eye
4-4-3 in head, 1-5-1-6 in snout, 1-5-1-7 in postorbital part of the head,
and subequal to the interorbital width. Width of snout before eyes about
% of its length. Head depressed, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves.
Top of head scaly. Medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper
jaw, which latter is slender, 1-1-1:3 times longer than wide, scaly, 4-5
longitudinal and 2 transverse series of scales: scales not overlapping
medio-longitudinal ridge (fig. 1, A). Width of lower jaw below tip of
snout about half-eye diameter. Minute curved conical teeth (unicuspid)
in 2-3 rows in lower and 3-4 rows in upper jaw; a few tricuspid inner
teeth in larger specimens. Beak slender, cutaneous fringes as wide as
beak; subgular sac small. Preorbital slightly longer than deep, less
than eye, covered by a single scale with central pore. Opercle with one
small and two large scales. 2 series of scales on cheek, scaling extends
forward along side of mandible about an eye diameter beyond below the
tip of the snout.
Gill-rakers 25-28, slender, 2 in gill-filaments, which are slightly longer
than 2in eye. Branchiostegals 10, membrane and mentum scaleless.
D 16-17, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of
caudal and ventral. Anterior rays slightly elevated, 3rd longest, about
3 in head; remainder decrease to the last, which is about 5 in head.
Kdge of fin slightly concave. Scaleless.
A 16-18, commences below the 2nd or 3rd dorsal ray. Shape similar
to that of dorsal. Length of base slightly less than that of dorsal. Scale-
less, or few basal scales in large examples.
P 11, conspicuously short, 1-8-2 in head. Scaleless.
V 6, scaleless, about half the length of the pectoral, inserted midway
37
Lhe South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 145
between base of caudal and base of pectoral to hind margin of operculum ;
usually nearer base of caudal than hind margin of head. Anterior rays
longer.
Caudal moderately forked, upper lobe shorter, 1-2 in lower: mid rays
1-6-2 times eye. Peduncle slender.
Air-bladder simple.
3
Scales.—Lateral rows 55-58, 1.1, —__—_______, predorsal 34-35,
3+ 26 —28 +22 —24
5-6 rows between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with one to
four inferior tubules (Plate X, B).
Colour.—Blue-green above, silvery below. Nape, occiput, snout, and
opercle dusky. Beak and membranes black, tip of beak red. A narrow,
plumbeous lateral stripe from upper edge of pectoral base to base of caudal,
broadest (2 in eye) below origin of dorsal. In ripe males this stripe extends
on to and over the lower caudal lobe. Anterior portion of dorsal dark,
lighter posteriorly. A dark spot at the base of each dorsal and anal ray.
Caudal with marginal area dusky. Remaining fins light.
Length.—95-220 mm.
Distribution.—South and east coasts of Africa. From False Bay to
Natal, entering rivers, extending into fresh water.
Types from Knysna in the Albany Museum.
Juveniles.
The young of this species are very slender and show main divergence
from the adult form in the extent of the prolongation of the lower jaw
and to a lesser extent in the shape of the caudal. The dorsal, anal, and
pectoral fins approximate throughout in size and shape to those of the
adult. The ventral fins are searcely visible in very small specimens
(< 12 mm.), but thereafter rapidly attain and remain at the adult
proportions.
When 7 mm. in length the young are transparent, with a few dusky
specks on the dorsal surface. The mouth is very oblique, the lower jaw
not prolonged, and the triangular part of the upper jaw many times wider
than long. The caudal is symmetrical, almost truncate, and there ig no
trace of the lateral stripe. The lower jaw is first observed to project
when the fishes exceed 10-12 mm. in length, and thereafter increases
rapidly in relative length, the proportions of the adult in this feature
being attained when the total length of the fish exceeds 30 mm.
The relative increase in the length of this feature is shown on p. 146.
At 10-12 mm. length the specks on the body are darker, and the
first signs of the lateral stripe are seen as a series of short, dark longitudinal
38
146 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Total length of Lower jaw in
specimen (mm.). total length.
16 16
20 10
23 6:6
27 55
31 5-0
33 4-6
lines. The lower caudal lobe is now the longer. The lateral stripe is
visible as such in specimens exceeding 20 mm. in length, and the caudal
is markedly asymmetric. The mouth becomes less oblique, and the pro-
longation of the upper jaw commences when the length exceeds 25 mm.
At about 30 mm. total length the triangular upper jaw is about 4 times
wider than long; at 70 mm. it is almost as long as wide; at 80-100 mm. as
long as wide; thereafter gradually more acute, until in specimens over
200 mm. in length it is as much as 1-3 times longer than wide. At
all stages the beak is black, the red tip appearing in the later juvenile
stages.
This species is closely related to schlegeli Blkr. and improvisus n. sp.,
from which it is distinguished by the more acutely triangular part of the
upper jaw as well as by the greater number of scales in a lateral series,
and of dorsal and anal rays.
It is also related to georgi C. & V., from which it differs in the shorter
beak, as well as in the more anterior position of the ventrals and in the
greater number of dorsal and anal rays.
The two specimens from False Bay, very inadequately described by
Fowler (loc. cit.) as unifasciatus Ranz, are most probably knysnaensis.
Breeding Habits, Etc.
Hl. knysnaensis appears to be present in the tidal rivers of South Africa
throughout the year, extending into fresh water. Ripe fishes are first en-
countered in October and are most numerous.in November and December.
The young are exceedingly abundant in these months, and are present until
February, after which they disappear. It is curious that the ripe fishes of
this species have not been observed to congregate in any special areas, but
are encountered in the surface of deep as well as shallow water, from two
to four swimming one behind the other. Females predominate markedly
in number.
The eggs are demersal, 1-6 mm. in diameter, almost transparent, and
densely covered with glutinous hair-like filaments, considerably longer
39
The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 147
than the diameter of the egg. The larger females produce about 10,000
eggs per season.
Hemirhamphus schlegeli Blkr.
1862. Bleeker, Mem. Soc. Holl. Haarlem, p. 120, fig. 1.
1866. Gunther, Cat. Fish. Brit. Mus., vi, p. 266 (calabaricus).
1866. Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3), xvili, p. 427 (calabaricus-
schlegelt Blkr.).
1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., xxi, p. 262 (calabaricus part).
Body elongate, subcylindrical, about 14 times as deep as wide.
Depth 9-9-4, length of head 4:4, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-3-3-6
in body, 5-5-2 in total length. Eye 3-8-4 in head, 1-2-1:3 in snout, 1-5
in postorbital part of the head and subequal to the interorbital width.
Width of snout before eye 3 of its length. Head depressed, interorbital
flat, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves, scaly, 3 transverse series. Medio-
longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is slender,
as long as wide, scaly, 3-4 longitudinal and 2 transverse series of scales, not
overlapping median ridge. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout about
half eye diameter. Small conical, bi- and tricuspid teeth in 3 rows in each
jaw. Beak slender, cutaneous fringes almost as wide as beak; subgular
sac small. Preorbital almost as deep as long, covered by a single scale with
central pore. Three series of scales on cheek, scaling extends forward to
below corner of mouth; a single line of peres on the side of the chin.
Gill-rakers 22-26, slender, 2-3 in gill-filaments, which are about 1-5 in
eye. Branchiostegals 10, membrane scaleless.
D 14, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of caudal
and ventral. Anterior rays slightly elevated, 3rd longest, 2-5 in head,
remainder decrease, last 5 in head. - Edge of fin gently concave. Scaleless.
A 15-16, commences below 2nd dorsal ray. Shape similar to dorsal ;
slightly higher than dorsal. Length of base slightly less than that of
dorsal. Scaleless.
P 11, 1-7-1-8 in head, scaleless.
V 6, scaleless, half the length of the pectoral, inserted midway between
base of caudal and hind margin to middle of opercle. Anterior rays longer.
Caudal emarginate, upper lobe shorter, 1-3 in lower. Mid rays 1-5-1-7
times eye. Peduncle slender.
Scales.—Lateral rows 50, 1.1. predorsal 35, 6 rows between
4
2424 +22’
dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with 2 or 3 inferior tubules.
Air-bladder simple. |
Colour (preserved).—Brownish yellow, darker above. A dark lateral
stripe from base of caudal to axil of pectoral, widest below origin of dorsal.
40
148 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Anterior dorsal rays and margin of caudal dusky. Remaining fins light.
Beak black.
Length.—140-215 mm.
Locality.— Angola, Cameroons.
Distribution.— West coast of Africa.
This species does not strictly belong to the South African fauna, but is
included here since it is almost certain to be discovered within our regian.
Fowler (Ann. Nat. Mus., 1929, vi, pt. 2, p. 250) considers schlegeli
identical with unifasciatus Ranz. This is scarcely possible, since this
latter species has a very short beak, ventrals inserted midway between
caudal base and eye, and dense scaling on the dorsal and anal fins.
Notes on the H emirhamphidae.
These fishes appear to live almost exclusively in the surface of the
water, and show high specialisation of habit with adaptive modifications
in external form.
The leaping powers of the species of Hemirhamphus are markedly
characteristic. These fishes emerge from the water with the body rigidly
straight, and the leap is terminated either by falling flat upon the surface,
or, in the case of the smaller specimens, with the caudal first entering the
water. I have not yet seen any of these fishes ending a leap by diving head
first into the water. The ventrals are fully extended laterally during the
leap. As many as six or seven immediately consecutive leaps have been
observed, the pause between each for renewal of the impulse being extremely
brief. Adult specimens of H. far cover 10-15 feet in each leap, and are
able to progress up to 100 feet along the surface in this manner, at an
average speed of at least 25 feet per second. Very young specimens of
this species are apparently unable to emerge from the water and are very
easily captured, even by day. H. knysnaensis, a smaller species, progresses
in a similar fashion along the surface, but the body is held at an angle of
about 45° to the surface, the leaps are very short, 1-2 feet, and are
seldom repeated more than 4 or 5 times. Half-grown specimens of this
species show an interesting stage in the development of this power. When
startled, these fishes shoot up until the body as far as the ventrals is out
of the water at an angle of about 45° to the surface: with ventrals
widely extended, the body is held in this position, and urged forward along
the surface for a few yards at a surprising rate, the caudal vibrating with
extreme rapidity. As far as has been observed, none of these fishes, small
or large, attempt to escape attack, even from above, by diving, which
would appear to indicate that they do not readily sink from the surface for
any purpose.
41
Lhe South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 149
The leaping powers of these fishes have led Schlesinger (Phy. and Eth. d.
Scombr., Verh. Zoo. Bot. Ges. Wien, 1909, lix, pp. 302-339) to conclude
that the closely related Exocoetidae have developed from the Hemirham-
phidae. It would appear more reasonable to suppose that both forms have
developed simultaneously from a common surface-dwelling ancestral type,
the enlargement of the “ beak” of the Hemirhamphidae and the pectorals
of the Hzocoetidae representing later specialisation. The very young
stages of species of Hemirhamphus have no “ beak,” while the pectorals of
the very young of certain species of the Exocoetidae are relatively consider-
ably less elongate than those of the adult fishes.
The adoption of a purely surface life in the case of the Hemirhamphidae
(and of the Hzocoetidae) is further indicated by the ventro-lateral position
of the lateral line in these fishes.
Functions of the “ Beak.”
Schlesinger (loc. cit.) has concluded that the prolonged lower jaw of the
Hemirhamphidae is employed to plough up the bottom mud in search of
food, and he discounts the statements of other investigators that the
stomach contents of these fishes consist solely of surface plants and
organisms. |
It has been previously indicated that there are reasons for believing
that the Hemirhamphidae are exclusively surface-dwellers. I have ex-
amined microscopically the stomach contents of many specimens of various
species of Hemirhamphus, and it is significant that in no case was any trace
of sand-particles observed. The aliments generally appear to consist of
surface plants, larval crustacea and fishes, and pelagic eggs. The Mugilidae
are also surface-dwellers, but feed not only upon surface organisms, but
also upon material obtained by skimming or stirring up the bottom mud and
eel-grass (Zostera) in shallow water ; sand particles are invariably present
in the aliments of the Mugilidae, frequently in large proportions. It
appears inconceivable that the Hemirhamphidae could eliminate all trace
of sand particles from food obtained by stirring up mud with the beak.
Further, the tip of the beak of a live Hemirhamphus is soft, and the
distal portions of the lateral cutaneous fringes extremely delicate and fairly
vascular. These fishes rapidly succumb when the beak is damaged, and it is
perhaps significant that among many hundreds of specimens I have taken
alive none have been found with a broken beak. It would therefore
appear extremely unlikely that the ‘“‘ beak ’’ is employed in the manner
suggested by Schlesinger.
From sustained observations, chiefly by night with the aid of a powérful
light, it appears not unlikely that the prolonged lower Jaw, with its cutaneous
42
150 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
fringes, is employed by these fishes as an organ for the detection of the
minute surface organisms which constitute their food. They lie in the
surface of the water with the cutaneous fringes of the beak fully extended
laterally. At frequent intervals the head may be seen to be jerked slightly
to one side, the body urged forward, and motions concomitant with the
assimilation of some particle ensure. Specimens will lie undisturbed in the
light of a lamp, if cautiously approached ; the body may be touched with
a very fine wire without occasioning undue alarm, but if the beak is only
lightly touched, the fish withdraws violently.
The function of the subgular sac remains obscure. The contents of the
distended sac (rarely so observed after capture) appear to be liquid, and
not gaseous, but sufficient could not be obtained for investigation.
I wish to express my gratitude to Mr. J. Hewitt, Director of the Albany
Museum, and to Dr. K. H. Barnard, Assistant Director of the South African
Museum, for advice and assistance, and for the loan of material and
literature ; to Mr. J. R. Norman of the British Museum for the loan of,
and to Professor de Beaufort of Amsterdam, for the donation of, valuable
specimens. Also for financial assistance from the Carnegie fund, through
the Research Grant Board of South Africa, which defrayed part of the costs
of the investigation.
ALBANY Museum,
GRAHAMSTOWN.
Trans. Roy. Soc. §. Afr., Vol. XXT. Plate X
LATERAL LINE SCALES, SEMI-DIAGRAMMATIC.
A, Hemirhamphus far Forsk.
B, Hemirhamphus knysnaensis n. sp.
C, Hemirhamphus delagoae Brnrd.
J. L. B. Smith. Neill & Co., Ltd.
Plate XI.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. X XI.
‘(ayeur) ‘ds ‘u siswanushuy snydunysmazy ‘2
‘ds ‘u snswmosdut snydumnysuazy *y
zy) \
Py
Neill & Co., Ltd.
J. L. B. Smith,
Plate XIT.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. X XT.
‘pruig avobojap snydunysvwmayy °%
‘ysiog wof snydupy.uwey *T
o
xh
RIN
(io
wo
i
Neill & Co., Ltd.
J. L. B. Smtth.
43.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXII.
Part |. pp. 83-87. PI. IV. August, 1934.
THE GROWTH CHANGES OF PTEROPLATEA
NATALENSIS, G. anv T.
By J. L. B. Smira,
(With Plate IV and one Text-figure.)
Famity DASYBATIDAE.
Genus PreropLaTEA, Miller and Henle.
1913. Garman, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., p. 412.
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Museum, vol. xxi, p. 80.
To the diagnosis of this genus add the following: “An ovoid flap of
the iris extending over the pupil from the upper margin, increasing with
age. A wide but low crenulate cutaneous flap on floor and on roof of mouth,
behind the dental laminae, may be present. A small tentacle, on the inner
posterior margin of the spiracle, sometimes present, decreasing with age,
possibly becoming obsolete in large sexually mature individuals.’
Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T.
1911. Gilchrist and Thompson, Ann. S.A. Mus., vol. xi, pt. 2, p. 56.
1925. Barnard (loc. cit.), p. 81.
The holotype of this species is a juvenile male from Natal, 280 mm.
across the disc. It possesses a small pointed tentacle on the inner posterior
margin of the spiracle, while the disc is markedly triangular in shape, with
undulate anterior margin. The caudal spine has been stated not to be
serrate, but this is an error. The serrations are present, but are hidden
under the skin or by a coating of mucus.
The only other species recorded from South Africa is mecrura, Bl. Schn.
The identification is based upon two large specimens, one stuffed, one cast
(from the Agulhas Bank), inthe S.A. Museum. This species has no tentacle,
and the disc is subrhomboidal in shape.
Very little appears to be known about the habits and development of
species of this genus, nor, in so far as I have been able to ascertain, have
the growth changes of any species been previously described.
The present work is based upon the examination of a graduated series
44
84 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
of specimens, ranging from 104-1830 mm. across the disc, secured in the
course of experimental netting in the Knysna estuary.
These fishes appear to enter the river chiefly during the late summer
and early winter months, but have been observed throughout the year.
Of the specimens mentioned above, only two were sexually mature. These
were gravid females, 1790 and 1830 mm. across the disc respectively, and
each proved to hold eight embryos. The smaller of the two was taken
near the mouth of the river, while the larger was captured about seven
miles higher, where the salinity of the water is very considerably lower
than that of the sea. The netters state that very large as well as very
small specimens are by no means infrequently taken in the autumn. It
is possible that gravid females may seek out the more protected waters of
the river to give birth to the young. Since, however, sexually immature
individuals are as frequently present, it is possible that the entering of the
river may be purely fortuitous, for the mouth of the Knysna River is both
wide and deep.
In so far as may be judged from the stomach contents, the food of these
fishes appears to consist of small fishes (Sparus sarba Forsk. and Mugil sps.)
and crustacea, chiefly crabs.
The larger of the two gravid females to which reference is made above
might easily have been mistaken for a specimen of micrura, since there was
no trace of a spiracular tentacle, and the disc was much less triangular in
shape than that of the type of natalensis. The embryos it contained
(5 2, 3 3) are, however, quite apparently conspecific with natalensis, since
these all possess the spiracular tentacle, and are even more markedly
triangular in shape than the type. These embryos (104-117 mm. across
the disc) are far from mature: the appendicular yolk-sac is large, the caudal
spine is unossified and adnate, while chromatophores are not visible, and
filamentous external accessory gills are present. In the smaller of the two
females (1790 mm.) the spiracular tentacle has been reduced to a mere knob,
while the disc resembles that of the larger female. The embryos (6 2, 2 3,
265-280 mm. across the disc) are in this case mature. The yolk has been
fully absorbed, external gills are absent, the coloration is fully developed,
and the caudal spine is ossified, serrate and free. All possess the spiracular
tentacle. One of these is shown in Pl. IV, fig. 2.
Embryonic Forms.
The width of the disc in the embryos is 1-6-1-7 times the length (tip of
snout to level of hind margin of disc). The mid-point of the line joining
the pectoral apices is 3-5-5-0 times as far from the tip of the snout as from
the hind margin of the disc (in the type specimen 4:3). There does not
45
Lhe Growth Changes of Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T. 85
appear to be any appreciable change in the shape of the disc from the early
to the later stages of embryonic development. The interorbital width is
0-9-1-3 in the snout (for convenience measured from midway between the
centres of the eyes to the anterior point of the disc). In the very small
specimens the eyes are pedunculated, and the developing iridal flap shows
as a small but sharp convexity at the upper margin of the pupil. The
caudal is 1-3-1-8 in the length of the disc, with a moderate cutaneous fold
above and below. The ossification of the caudal spine is evidently one of
the later processes of embryonic development, possibly taking place while
the whole spine is adnate to the body of the caudal. The accessory external
filamentous gills of the very small specimens are considerably longer than
the disc. The coloration of the mature embryos is very similar to that of
half-grown individuals, except that numerous round spots are more obvious.
Post-natal and Mature Stadia.
The disc changes from subtriangular to subrhomboidal with growth,
becoming also relatively broader (fig. 1, A-F). The posterior margin of
Fig. 1.—Diagram to illustrate the change in shape of the disc of Pteroplatea natalensis,
G. and T., with growth. Width of disc in mm.: A, 105; B, 280; C, 435; D, 610;
E, 1080; F, 1830.
the disc is gently convex, sometimes finely scalloped. The anterior mar-
gin of the pectoral is gently undulate, with concavity about midway
between pectoral apex and snout. The pectoral apices become less
obtuse with growth. The interorbital width is equal to or slightly
greater than the snout (see above). The eyes are prominent, and the
iridal flap in the larger specimens covers most of the pupil. Length of
spiracle about 2-5 in interorbital width, which is 10-12 in disc width. The
46
86 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
spiracular tentacle in young and half-grown individuals is slender and
pointed, 8-10 in spiracle length; apparently diminishes with age. Caudal
small, diminishing in relative length with growth (the accidental shorten-
ing of this organ by injury is frequently observed in Dasybatids). Cutaneous
fold, above and below, moderate. One or, more usually, two serrated
spines near caudal base, short and stout. No dorsal fin or, as observed
in one case, a mere rudiment, reduced to a small fold of thickened skin
immediately anterior to the caudal spines. Skin smooth. Teeth tesselate,
each rhomboidal base with a flattened triangular retrorse point. The
number of the teeth in each row and the number of rows increases from
40 rows of 8-10 each in the smaller to 110 rows of 15-20 each in the largest
specimens. Anterior and posterior margins of each lamina undulate: the
upper lamina with anterior median convexity, the lower with median anterior
concavity (Pl. IV, A and B). (Barnard’s comment, loc. cit., p. 81, on the
paragraph about the dental laminae in the original description is rather
severe. The meaning of this rather obscurely worded paragraph becomes
clear when the laminae are examined.) Colour uniform brown above, or
with darker or lighter vermiculations and blotches, light below. Tail with
alternate dark and light annulations, becoming obscure in adults.
The following table indicates the chief changes which take place with
growth :—
Sex. Ft | M.2 |] M8 F. F. F.4 F, F.
Width disc in mm. . | 105 | 265 | 280 | 435 | 610 | 1080/1790} 1830
Length disc in width 1-6 | 1-7 | 1-75] 1-85] 1-9 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-0
Caudal in disc length . | 1:5 | 1:8 | 2:0 | 2-5 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 2:5 | 3-3
Pectoral line ® . | 50 | 4:2 | 4:3 | 3-2 | 2-6 | 1-95] 1-6 | 1-6
In fig. 1 ; ; .| A - B C D 1D) .. F
1 Most triangular immature embryo.
2 Plate IV, fig. 2. 8 Type specimen. 4 Plate IV, fig. 1.
* The number of times that the mid-point of the line joining the pectoral apices is
farther from the tip of the snout than from the posterior margin of the disc.
This species is very closely related to altavela Linn., from the tropical
Atlantic, from which it apparently differs in the markedly triangular disc,
in the more obtuse pectoral apices and in the more more undulation
of the anterior margins of the pectorals. These differences are slight,
especially since altavela appears to be of somewhat variable form. Garman
(loc. cit., p. 415) considers canariensis Val., valencienni Dum., and vaillanti
Rochebr. conspecific with altavela. It is possible that the earlier figures
of species are not always to be relied upon, but I have seen those of these
47
The Growth Changes of Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T. 87
synonyms, and they differ very considerably one from the other. It is not
unlikely also that very different stadia have been figured.
I may here call attention to the fact that descriptions of the species of
this genus rarely include the precise size of the specimens described, which,
in view of the evidence here adduced, considerably diminishes their value.
It would not indeed be surprising if natalensis were to be found conspecific
with altavela. Barnard, loc. cit., probably had some such idea, since he
remarks that the adult of natalensis, when found, would probably be found
referable to a previously known species. I do not feel justified in pro-
nouncing natalensis a synonym of altavela, since I have seen no authentically
named specimens of the latter.
It may be remarked that the growth changes of natalensis indicate
that a revision of this genus, based upon adequate material, would prob-
ably result in a somewhat drastic limitation of the number of species. It
is evident that the shape of the disc, the length of the caudal, and even
the presence or absence of the spiracular tentacle are, unless many equl-
valent stadia are compared, not as reliable a guide to the differentiation of
species as may hitherto have been supposed.
At Knysna, natalensis is named “Backwater” by the netters: when
caught, the fish lies flat against the net and so renders the retraction
extremely arduous. The species is for this reason an extremely unwelcome
capture, and also, in addition, since: its presence in the net appears to
terrify the other fishes, great numbers of whom escape by jumping over the
net. At Knysna this species is seldom taken on lines, but farther east
it is not an infrequent capture. A large specimen of presumably this
species was recently taken on a line in the Keiskama River, and in Natal
waters it is no infrequent capture, large specimens proving formidable
antagonists to the angler.
I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of
the S.A. Museum, for his kind assistance in regard to material and literature
in the S.A. Museum. Also to the Carnegie Research Fund (through the
Research Grant Board of South Africa) for financial assistance.
ALBANY MUSEUM,
GRAHAMSTOWN,
August 1933.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII.
Plate IV,
pase
}
1. Half-grown female, x
2. Mature male embryo.
PTEROPLATEA NATALENSIS, G. and T.
1
10°
A. Upper dental lamina of a specimen 1830 mm. disc width.
B. Lower dental lamina of same.
Neill & Co., Ltd.
49.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXII.
Part |. pp. 89-100. Pls. V and VI. August, 1934.
MARINE FISHES OF SEVEN GENERA NEW TO
SOUTH AFRICA.
By J. L. B. Smrra.
(With Plates V and VI, and one Text-figure.)
The following new genera are described below:—
Family StromatErpaE, Papyrichthys.
Family BarracnoipipaL, Batrichthys.
Family SYNGNATHIDAE.
M icrophis brachyurus Blkr.
1888. Day, Fishes of India, p. 680, pl. clxxiv, fig. 3 (Doryichthys bleekeri
Day).
1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Indo-Aus. Fishes, iv, p. 44, fig. 21.
Body moderately slender, depth 4-5 in head, almost as wide as deep.
Head 4-8 in length to caudal base. Tail (without fin) slightly shorter
than half distance from snout tip to vent. Eye 10, snout 1-6, and post-
orbital 3-4 in length of head.
Operculum with a slight medio-longitudinal ridge for the entire length;
on one side 3, on the other 5, similar shorter, curved, radiating ridges
below, all feebly serrate. Snout very compressed, with supero-median.
ridge. Supra-orbital ridge continuous from temporal region on to snout.
All ridges on head and snout feebly serrate. .
Rings 22+23. Each body plate has 14-18 smooth parallel vertical
ridges, which sometimes become furcated and reticulate below. Across
_ Nee.
COINS EEE EEE PELE
Basse ecee a eS cee
—lan__.
Fia. 1.—Microphis brachyurus Blkr.
the middle of each plate are 3 longitudinal curved ridges. The edge of
each plate is serrulate, the serrae corresponding in number with the vertical
ridges; last spinelet in each plate slightly enlarged. |
The supero-lateral body ridge is discontinuous with the supero-lateral
caudal ridge, and extends to the 7th caudal ring. The medio-lateral body
50
90 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
ridge curves down below the origin of the dorsal and unites with the
infero-lateral caudal ridge on the 2nd caudal ring. The infero-lateral body
ridge is not continuous with the infero-lateral of the caudal, and curves
on to the ventral surface of the caudal, ending in the 2nd caudal ring.
The supero-lateral caudal ridge curves down (forwards) below the hind end
of the dorsal to medio-lateral, and extends as far as the hind margin of
the last body ring.
D 40, base not raised, as long as snout, originates on penultimate
body ring, on 9 rings (2+7).
A 5, very small, inserted below anterior dorsal rays.
P 19, slightly longer than eye, emarginate. Caudal small, about 3 in
snout, rounded. No brood pouch visible, presumably a female specimen.
Colour.—Light brown, margins of plates lighter. Fins light; caudal
dark.
Length.—160 mm.
A single specimen, from Durban, presented by HE. C. Chubb, Esq.,
Curator of the Durban Museum.
M. brachyurus has been recorded from East Africa to the Indo-Pacific.
The only other species of this genus hitherto recorded from Africa is smathu
Dum., from the tropical west coast, which is stated to be fluviatile.
M. brachyurus is closely related to this species, differing only in certain
minor features, such as the longer snout and the more posterior insertion
of the shorter dorsal. it is possible that wider collection may show that
the two forms are identical. It appears preferable to maintain the Indian
Ocean form as a separate species until such time as the recorded areas may
be linked up.
Family PLECTORHYNCHIDAE.
Scolopsis vosmert (Bloch.).
(Plate V, A.)
1878. Day, Fishes of India, p. 87, pl. xxiii, fig. 1.
Dorsal profile even, body compressed, ovate. Depth 2-1, length of
head 2-9 in length of body: eye 3-1 in head, slightly greater than snout
and than interorbital width, 1-1 in postorbital part of head. Preopercular
margin concave, strongly serrulate, spinelets directed obliquely outwards.
Preorbital produced backwards into a prominent flat spine, extending
almost to below hind margin of pupil: 5 graduated smaller spines below.
Suborbital feebly serrated. Muciferous pores on anterior part of head.
Mouth small, terminal, maxilla extends to below anterior margin of eye,
almost entirely concealed beneath preorbital. Villiform teeth in bands
in both jaws, tapering towards the sides, which have only a single row of
51
Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 91
teeth. Palate and tongue edentate. Gill-rakers 5, very short and stout;
3 in gill-fringes, which are 2-5 in eye.
D X 9, commences above middle of operculum, not notched. 1st spine
shortest, 4-4in head; 2nd 3-1; 3rd 2:6; 4th and 5th longest, 2-4; last 2-8 in
head. Anterior rays equal to last spine.
A III 7, commences below the 2nd dorsal ray. 2nd spine very stout,
longest slightly longer than 4th dorsal spine. Vertical fins not scaly.
P 18; 1:3 in head, rounded.
V 15, 1-25 in head, inserted below 6th dorsal spine; 1st ray filamentous,
reaches to base of 2nd anal spine.
Caudal forked, upper lobe longer.
Scales ctenoid, 1.1. 41, ltr. 34/14; 1.1. tubes bifurcate on anterior scales.
Some posterior 1.1. scales have 2-3 superior branches each ending in a
pore. 1.1. scales smaller than body scales, 4-5 series on cheek.
Colour.—Yellow-brown, with a light band over the nape and a light
stripe along the side. Dorsal dark anteriorly, other fins light; axil of
pectoral and upper hind margin of operculum black.
Length.—107 mm.
Locality.—Presumably Port Alfred, having been found together with
other unlabelled fishes among the old collection of the Albany Museum.
Distribution.—Indo- Pacific.
This is the first authentic record of a species of this genus from South
Africa. As mentioned by Barnard (Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, xxi, p. 669),
Playfair and Gunther record Scolopsis monogramma K. and v. H. from
Mozambique, but without citing any authority.
I have seen no recent work dealing with the species of this genus, but
the older differentiation, based apparently largely upon coloration, appears
none too sound, and is probably in need of revision.
The presence of this species on our southern coast is noteworthy. The
stretch of coast from Algoa Bay to East London has not before received
much attention from ichthyologists, and has proved a rich collecting
ground. Numerous species formerly believed to be confined to the western
and south-western coasts (among others Congiopodus torvus (Gron.) and
many species of Clinus Cuv.) have been found commonly occurring there,
while many species normally accounted as tropical (e.g. among others
Petroscirtes tapeinosoma (Blkr.), Monoceros Unicornis (Forsk.), and Albula
vulpes (Linn.)) have also been found.
The occurrence of the present species is therefore not in any way
exceptional.
52
92 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Family BROTULIDAE.
Grammonus opisthodon n. sp.
(Plate VI, B.)
Body compressed, moderately elongate, tapering uniformly from nape.
Depth 4, length of head 3-2 in length of body. Eye 7, snout 4, interorbital
3-2, and postorbital 1-7 in length of head. Nostrils widely separated,
anterior on snout. No barbels or spines on head, except for a strong
spine, and a second, weaker, diverging on opercle. Preopercle margin
below skin, with an obtuse ridge at the angle. Muciferous pores on head,
very marked on chin. Snout obtuse, somewhat swollen. Mouth terminal,
large, slightly oblique. Maxilla extends well behind eye, its length 1-7 in
length of head, posteriorly dilated to a width equal to eye, with a retrorse
spine on the hinder lower edge. A single series of fairly large curved
conical teeth in each jaw: no villiform teeth. Two separate obtuse
vomerine knobs, each with two large conical curved teeth. Palatines,
ather bones, and tongue edentate. Gull-membranes separate, free from
isthmus. Gills 4, a slit behind the 4th. Giull-rakers 3, long and spinose,
plus 5 spinous flattened ridges anteriorly. Pseudobranchiae absent.
Branchiostegals 6. Vent postmedian.
D 65, originates 1-6 times as far from caudal base as from tip of snout,
over middle of pectoral.
A 35, originates 1-5 times as far from tip of snout as from caudal base.
Median fins confluent with caudal.
P 23, 1-5 in head, rounded, base enlarged.
Ventrals each reduced to a single filament, about 4 in head, inserted
below the opercle.
No sign of any scales, or of lateral line.
Caudal small, pointed.
Length.—50 mm.
Locality.—Port Alfred.
Colour.—Brownish, with numerous small black spots.
This interesting small specimen is unfortunately not in very good
condition, and the absence of scales and lateral line cannot therefore be
regarded as established. Since it does not appear to fall into any genus of
this family of which I have a description, I forwarded the specimen to
Mr. Norman of the British Museum, who, at my request, compared it
with the Brotulids in their collection. It is apparently identical with
none of these.
I have provisionally assigned it to Grammonus Gill, with the diagnosis
of which it agrees broadly. It differs in many features, however, the
53
Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. . 93
most marked being the presence of the maxillary spine, and in the absence
of villiform teeth in the jaws and on the vomer, as well as in the absence
of scales and of lateral line.
Generic distinction in the Brotulidae appears to be rather fine, and the
present species may well serve as the type of a new genus. This is, how-
ever, largely dependent upon the discovery of specimens in good condition,
in which the presumed absence of scales and lateral line may be confirmed.
This is the first record of a species of this genus from South Africa. Two
other species are known, both from the Mediterranean: ater Risso is
probably bathybial and is said to come inshore to spawn; the other is
armatus Doederlein, about which little is known.
Family STROMATEIDAE.
Papyrichthys n.g.
Body ovate, very highly compressed, especially at the bases of the
dorsal and anal fins, these regions being distinct from the body proper.
Mouth large, slightly oblique. Maxilla excluded from margin of upper-
jaw, almost entirely concealed beneath preorbital. A single row of
moderate fine-pointed teeth in each jaw. Palatal teeth present or absent.
Branchiostegals 5. Giull-opening wide, membranes free, rakers well
developed. Pseudobranchiae present.
Dorsal and anal very long, rays free from enveloping skin. Pectorals
inserted low down. Ventrals of one short spine and five rays, longer than
pectorals, inner rays longest, extending well behind origin of anal. Body
and part of head covered with very small cycloid scales, probably always
more than 100 in lateral series. Pores on head and body few or absent.
Lateral line high, more or less following the dorsal profile. Air-bladder
present. Pyloric caeca moderately numerous, branched. Vertebrae 40.
Genotype pellucidus Liitken. |
This genus is related to Psenes C. and V., but it is well differentiated —
by the very minute scales, the size and shape of the ventrals, the very
highly compressed body, and the greater number of vertebrae. I have
examined a specimen of Psenes indicus Day, which apparently does not
possess the many-branched pyloric caeca such as are found in Papyrichthys.
This may prove a characteristic feature of this latter genus, although
Regan (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1902 (7), X, p. 118) has given reasons why
the nature of the caeca is not very reliable in defining genera in this family.
Psenes is stated by Regan (loc. cit.) to have 25 vertebrae, but while he
placed pellucidus in this genus, he had not seen a specimen, and merely
followed Liitken’s diagnosis. |
The very highly compressed plastic body, and the dentition, would
54
94 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
indicate that Papyrichthys is related also to Schedophilus Cocco, but it is
distinguished from this genus by the absence of pores on the body and
of the thickened porous skin on the occiput, as well as by the course of the
lateral line.
Papyrichthys pellucidus Liitken.
(Plate VI, A.)
1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean. Ichth., p. 221, pl. lx, fig. 228 (Psenes
pellucidus Liitken).
1902. Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), X, p. 125 (Psenes p.).
Body soft and flabby, very compressed, maximum width at shoulder
about 10 in length. Dorsal profile gently sloping from nape. Regions
containing the dermal rays at bases of dorsal and anal fins very highly
compressed, almost translucent, sharply defined. Snout very blunt,
almost vertical, with slight mesethmoidal ridge.
Depth 2:8, length of head 3-0 in length of body. Eye 4-0, interorbital
(convex) 5, snout 3-4, and postorbital length 2-1 in head. Interopercle
with traces of marginal spinules. Other bones of head entire. Preorbital
with anterior trifid ridge. Bones of head soft and cavernous. A few
pores on chin and head. None on body. Nostrils close together, much
nearer snout tip than eye. Mouth large, terminal, slightly oblique, jaws
equal. Maxilla extends to below the anterior third of the eye; end of
maxilla slightly expanded. A single comb-like row of moderate, fine,
pointed teeth, slightly recurved, in each jaw; those in lower jaw slightly
larger. Palatal bones edentate, but signs of small teeth on vomer. Tongue
free, edentate. Gill-rakers 13, longest slightly shorter than gill-filaments,
3 in eye, not very close set, spinulate below. Pseudobranchiae well
developed. Branchiostegals 5. Pyloric caeca 10, each lobate, many-
branched.
D XII 34 (spines all broken, very weak), originates slightly behind
preopercular margin. Anterior rays slightly shorter than mid-posterior,
which are 1-7 in head. Hindmost rays slightly shorter. Bases of spines
enveloped in skin; rays quite free, joined by membrane.
A 35 (or I 34), originates below the 4th soft dorsal ray. Shape similar
to dorsal; hinder rays of same length as corresponding dorsal rays. Rays
free from skin.
P 19, inserted low down, base slightly oblique. Fin rounded, 1-4 in
head.
Ventrals I 5, inserted below the pectoral base, 1-3 in head, inner rays
longest, reach to the base of the 5th anal ray.
Caudal damaged (forked according to G. and B., loc. cit.), 10+16 +10.
Peduncle longer than deep, expanded posteriorly.
55
Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 95
Scales cycloid, very small, over whole body. Head apparently naked,
but damaged. (On cheek, according to G. and B.’s fig., loc. cit.) Lateral
line ascends to run. parallel with dorsal profile, almost an eye-diameter
below. 1.1. about 125 (very approximately; G. and B.’s fig. shows 150).
Colour (preserved).—Uniform light brown. Fins light; dorsal, anal,
and ventrals with darkish margin.
Length.—120 mm.
A single specimen from Durban, presented by E. C. Chubb, Esq.,
Curator of the Durban Museum.
There appears to be very little doubt that the present specimen should
be assigned to pellucidus.
The specimen is not in very good condition, but most of the features
may be discerned.
G. and B.’s figure shows a deeper body, more scales, a shorter snout,
and the outer ventral rays longer than the inner. These differences are
not significant, and may be due to the difficulty of observing accurately
in so small a specimen as the type (about 60 mm. total length).
This species has been recorded from the Atlantic (32° N. x 76° W.)
from a depth of 528 fathoms, and its presence in Natal waters is of interest.
Schedophilus medusophagus Cocco.
(Plate V, C.)
1876. Gunther, Challenger Rep., xxu, p. 46.
1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean Ichth., p. 214, fig. 223.
1902. Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), X, p. 196 (Lirus m.).
Body very compressed, ovate, extremely soft and pliable. Regions
at bases of dorsal and anal, containing dermal rays, distinct and differen-
tiated. Dorsal profile evenly convex. Snout slightly swollen, somewhat
blunt. Interorbital strongly convex.
Depth 2-6, length of head 3-9 in length of body. Eye equal to snout
and to interorbital width, 4:6, postorbital length 1-8, in length of head.
Preorbital depth 1-7 in eye. Preopercle with flat spinules round angle.
Traces of spines on interopercle. Remaining bones entire. Occiput and
snout with thickened porous integument. Almost whole of head except
operculum densely pitted with pores: radiating series round orbit. Nostrils
close together, midway between snout tip and anterior margin of eye:
Gill-openings wide, membranes free. Rakers fairly long, 15 on lower
part of anterior arch, longest slightly shorter than gill-filaments, 2 in eye.
Rakers spinulose on basal half. Oesophagus with 14 papillate sacs.
Vertebrae 42 (16 + 26).
56
96 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Mouth large, slightly oblique; jaws equal. Maxilla extends to below
behind centre of eye: upper margin slips, for the whole length, beneath
the preorbital. Supplemental bone not obvious, maxilla not, or scarcely,
expanded posteriorly. Teeth in a single comb-like series in each Jaw,
larger and smaller teeth alternating, larger teeth subspatulate. Palate
and tongue edentate.
D 52, commences above hind margin of head. First few rays appear
spinate, but all but tip is hidden in scaly skinny sheath. Rays increase
gradually in length to the middle of the fin; there about 3 in head, remain
subequal to the posterior, which are slightly shorter. The whole of the
fin with a scaly, skinny basal investment; longest rays emerge for less
than half of their length. Fin low, rays inclined obliquely backward,
apparently not fully erectile.
A 35, commences below the 20th dorsal ray; shape of fin, length of rays,
and skinny basal investment as for dorsal.
P 20, inserted very low, 2-2 in head, base not oblique. A scaly, skinny
investment almost half of length of fin. Upper rays longer.
V 15, inserted very slightly in advance of the pectorals, 3in head. Last
ray joined to belly bya membrane. Base of fin in scaly, skinny investment.
Caudal gently rounded, 1-7 in head. Peduncle as deep as long. Scales
cycloid, fairly small. 1.1. 135, very slightly curved anteriorly, becomes
straight below the 12th dorsal ray, running obliquely down to peduncle.
Whole of body and head, except interorbital and chin, scaly. A pore below
almost every scale on body.
Colour.—Uniform brown (preserved).
Length.—230 mm.
A single specimen, found among fishes collected by S.S. “ Pickle,”
labelled “Natal Fishes,” unclassified, presented by the Director of the
Government Fisheries Survey to the Albany Museum.
Regan (loc. cit.) regards Schedophilus Cocco as a synonym of Lirus
Lowe, and states that Lirus has 25 vertebrae and a small supramaxilla.
There is no doubt that the two genera are closely related, but the greater
number of vertebrae of Schedophilus, as well as other minor features, would
appear to Justify the maintenance of this genus as distinct from Lirus.
Meristic variation is alone of doubtful validity in defining genera, but
since the other species of Lirus all presumably have 25 vertebrae, it would
appear reasonable in this case. Further, I can find no signs of any supra-
maxilla in my specimen, nor is any mentioned in any description, or shown
in any figure of medusophagus to which I have access.
It is with considerable doubt that the present specimen is assigned to
medusophagus, since it differs in many significant features. The heavy
dermal investment of the greater part of the dorsal and anal, as well as the
57
Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 97
similar partial investment of the pectorals and ventrals, is not mentioned
in descriptions of that species. Giinther (fide G. and B., loc. cit.) states
that the hinder dorsal and anal rays are not “erectile into the vertical
position.” This is true of my specimen, but the reason for this is the
skinny sheath. Further, both dorsal and anal are longer, and there are more
rays in the present specimen, but medusophagus is stated to vary widely in
these counts, so that the present differences may not be of specific significance.
medusophagus has been recorded from the Atlantic and from Samoa.
Its presence in Natal waters is of interest.
Family ScoRPAENIDAE,
Setarches gtinthert Johnson.
(Plate VI, C.)
1876. Giinther, Challenger Rep., xxii, p. 19, pl. i, C (fidjiensis); p. 19
(parmatus). |
1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean. Ichth., p. 263; p. 264, fig. 249 (parmatus).
Body moderately compressed, greatest width at nape. Head fairly
depressed, interorbital almost plane. Depth 3-1, length of head 2-3 in
length of body. Eye 6, snout 2-4, interorbital 4-5, and postorbital 2 in
length of head. Head ridged and spinose. Preopercular stay prominent.
Two long diverging spines on opercle. Suprascapula and coracoid exposed,
each terminating in a flat spine. Three spines at angle of preopercle,
slightly less than eye, the upper two on one side almost parallel (Pl. VI, A),
the lower diverging: on the other side the three are equally divergent.
Two others on lower margin, anterior smaller. Three preorbital spines
projecting downwards over the maxilla. The anterior small and antrorse;
the other two retrorse, graduated, the posterior the longer. Two low,
flattened occipital spines, one similar postorbital spine, on each side,
One antorbital spine projecting back over the eye, and one small retrorse
nasal spine. Mouth large, somewhat oblique, maxilla highly expanded
posteriorly, extends to below hind margin of orbit. Jaws subequal, no
marked bony tubercle at symphysis of lower jaw. Upper jaw notched
opposite symphysis. A narrow band of villiform teeth in each jaw. A
chevron-shaped band, discontinuous at apex, of similar teeth on vomer.
Similar teeth on palatines. The premaxilla has a supero-median expansion
which slides under the maxilla. Premaxillary process short and curved.
Nostrils tubular, close together, nearer anterior margin of eye than snout
tip. Gill-openings wide, membranes free. Branchiostegals seven. Pseudo-
branchiae present. Gill-rakers long, slender, 10 on lower part of anterior arch,
anterior longest, almost equal to eye: gill-filaments short, about 3 in eye.
VOL, XXII, PART I. 7
58
98 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
D XII 10, originates slightly in advance of hind margin of head. Ist
spine equal to eye, then increase to the 4th, which is longest, 2-6 in head:
thereafter decrease to the 11th, which is 6 in head. 12th spine more than
twice llth. Soft dorsal rounded, midrays longest, almost 2 in head.
A III 5, originates below the 3rd dorsal ray.
P 22, 1-3 in head, base fairly broad, extends to below the 4th dorsal
ray. The upper ray and on one side 3, and on the other the 4 lower rays
simple, the remainder branched. Ventrals 1-9 in head, do not reach vent;
Ist ray longest. |
Caudal almost truncate, 1-1 in head. Peduncle compressed, as deep
as long, equal to eye.
Scales minute, cycloid. About 95 in lateral series. Lateral line raised,
26-27 perforations. Opercle and preopercle (above and below suborbital
ridge) scaly. Rest of head naked.
Colour.—Light red-brown. Fins light.
Length.—190 mm.
Locality Presumably Natal, being found among fishes labelled “ Natal
Fishes,” unclassified. Collected by S.S. “ Pickle’’; presented to the Albany
Museum by the Director of the Government Fisheries Survey.
The three nominal species of this genus differ from one another only
in unimportant details, and the types vary considerably in size. The
type of guenthert, from Madeira, is 9 inches long; of fidjzensis, from the
Fijis (315 fms.), 3 inches; while the type of parmatus, from New England
(180 fms.), is only 2 inches in length, besides being damaged.
The spination of the cephalic bones is evidently variable. In my
specimen the arrangement of the preopercular spines is on one side inter-
mediate between the arrangement on the other and the arrangement in
gtinthert, in which they are stated to be parallel. The anterior (3rd) pre-
orbital spine is not much exposed, and may not be obvious in the other
specimens, especially in the smaller.
The differences in depth of body and in the relative sizes of the fins
of the various species described can be explained by the difference in size
between the specimens, and cannot be regarded as of specific significance.
Bathybial species are usually cosmopolitan, and the presence of this
species in Natal waters, while of interest, is not in any way exceptional.
Family BaTRacHOIDIDAE.
Batrichthys n.g.
Three lateral lines, each pore with minute cutaneous appendage above
and below; middle line obscure. Jaws with tapering bands of small
conical teeth. Larger teeth on vomer and palatines. Opercle with 2
59
Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 99
spines. Subopercle with 2 spines; lower shorter, parallel or slightly
divergent. Gill-opening fairly wide, extending from above the axil to
below pectoral base. Gill-rakers few, short, obtuse or tubercular. Pharyn-
geal teeth equal or graduated in size. Three dorsal spines. Caudal free.
No axillary foramen. Interorbital almost plane. Frontal ridges feeble.
Vertebrae 29.
Genotype albofasciatus n. sp.
This genus is closely related to Coryzichthys Ogilby (from the Indo-
Australian area), which is stated to have very restricted gill-openings,
embracing only the upper half of the pectoral base, and the pharyngeal
teeth are unequal in size. Ogilby (Ann. Queens. Mus., 1908, No. 9) *
places gangene Ham-Buch. in Coryzichthys, despite the fact that Day’s
figure (Fishes of India, p. 269, pl. lx, fig. 1) shows this species to have gill-
opening at least as large as the pectoral base. Day’s figure (which is
named grunniens, probably in error) shows 5 ventral rays, which must
be erroneous, and he neither described nor figured any lateral line system.
There appears to be little doubt that gangene and the species described
below are congeneric. |
This genus differs considerably from the two genera, Batrachoides Lac.
and Marcgravia Jord., the only two hitherto found in South Africa.
Batrichthys albofasciatus n. sp.
(Plate V, B.)
Body robust, compressed behind. Head depressed, interorbital flat,
skin slightly rugose. Depth 5-1, length of head 3 in length of body. Eye
5-5, snout 4, interorbital width 3-7, length of postorbital 1-6 in length of
head. Six small barbels, about } eye, on each side of chin, and one at
hind end of maxilla, and one at each side of upper jaw opposite symphysis.
Conspicuous mucus pores on head, each with a minute cutaneous appendage
above. Two short fimbriate nasal tentacles. No supra-orbital tentacles.
Mouth large, maxilla extends to below posterior margin of orbit. Small
curved conical teeth in posteriorly tapering bands in both jaws. Six
larger conical teeth across vomer, with 4 widely-spaced smaller teeth
anteriorly. A single series of similar teeth on palatines. Pharyngeal
teeth curved, conical, of uniform size on upper; posterior teeth on lower
pharyngeals slightly larger than anterior, no marked inequality in size.
~ Gill-membranes fused with isthmus, membrane expanded, fused with chest
to below behind pectoral base. Gill-opening wider than the whole width
of the pectoral base. Branchiostegals 5. Gill-rakers short, tubercular,
* T have not seen this paper.
60
100 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
apically dilated or bifurcated, 8 on lower part of anterior arch. Two
acute opercular spines, upper larger, divergent. Two similar on sub-
opercle, upper larger, almost parallel. Vertebrae 29 (12 +17).
D III+19, A 14. Soft dorsal and anal rays increase in length pos-
teriorly, hind rays 2-5 in head.
P 18, 1:5 in head, base heavy, sublobate. No foramen.
Ventral 1-5 in head; spine in thickened skin.
Caudal rounded, 1:4 in head. |
No scales. Three lateral lines. Upper and lower distinct, middle
obscure, consisting each of a row of pores, each with a minute cutaneous
appendage above and below. Upper runs from opercular margin up to
the soft dorsal and along the base of the latter. The middle line curves
down from the same origin as upper and runs along the middle of the side,
becomes obsolete before anal origin. The lower runs from the lower
margin of the pectoral base down to the origin of the anal, and then along
the base of the latter. |
Colour.—Brown, irregularly mottled with darker, and with dark spots
on the body, head, and all fins. Five slightly sinuous white cross-bars,
hinder 4 extending on to soft dorsal.
Length.—120 mm.
Locahty.—Great Fish Point.
Type.—In the Albany Museum.
As indicated above, it is open to doubt whether this species should not
be assigned to Coryzichthys Ogilby. The specimen described above is
evidently bathybial, since it was thrown up after a storm at Great Fish
Point, and the distended air-bladder was found to have filled almost the
whole mouth.
While bathybial forms are generally more or less cosmopolitan, it
appears preferable to retain this new genus until such time as the oppor-
tunity occurs to compare the genotype with Indian or Australian species.
albofasciatus is very closely related to gangene, differing in fin formulae,
in certain dimensional relationships, and in the absence of supra-orbital
tentacles. This latter difference may prove to be sexual, and it is not
unlikely that the two may prove to be conspecific.
I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of
the South African Museum, for his kind assistance and for the loan of
literature. Also to the Carnegie Research Fund (through the Research
Grant Board of South Africa) for financial assistance.
ALBANY Museum,
GRAHAMSTOWN,
October 1933.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXIT. Plate ¥.
A. Scolopsis vosmeri (Bloch.).
B. Batrichthys albofasciatus n.g. et sp.
C, Schedophilus medusophagus Cocco.
Neill & Co., Lid.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate VI.
A. Papyrichthys pellucidus Liitken n.g.
B. Grammonus opisthodon n. sp.
C, Setarches giinthert Johnson.
a, Preopercular spines on left side.
Neill & Co., Ltd.
61.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXII.
Part IV. pp. 321-336. Pls. XVI—XXII1. December, 1934.
THE TRIGLIDAE OF SOUTH AFRICA.
By J. L. B. Smira.
(With Plates XVI-XXIII and one Text-figure.)
(Read May 16, 1934. Revised MS. received June 18, 1934.)
Famity TRIGLIDAE.
Four genera of this family are admitted by Barnard (Ann. S.A. Mus.,
1925, vol. xxi, p. 938) to the South African fauna list, viz. Trigla Art.,
Peristedion Lac., Lepidotrigla Gnthr., and Chelidonichthys Kaup.
An examination of the material in the collections of the South African
Museum and of the Albany Museum indicated that a revision of the South
African species of this family was necessary.
A new sub-genus of Trigla, Trigloporus, and three new species, are
described below.
Key to the South African Genera.
I. Lateral line without spines.
A. Scales small to moderate, less than 70 in lateral line . Lepidotrigla.
B. Scales very small, more than 70 in lateral line. . Chelidonichthys.
II. Lateral line spinose.
A. Body covered with bony plates, each bearing a spine.
Preorbitals produced. . . . . . Peristedion.
B. Body scaly. Preorbitals not produced. Whole body
covered by a complex muciferous tube system.
Lateral line scales with several spines. . . Trigla (Trigloporus).
Genus LEPIDOTRIGLA Gnthr.
1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 938.
Body covered with scales of moderate size, ctenoid, or ctenoid above
lower third of side, cycloid ventrally. Breast naked, or partly scaly.
Lateral line bifurcates at caudal base, the branches extending on to the
caudal lobes. Lateral line tubes with one long oblique dorsal and a similar
ventral branch, and one to six intermediate smaller branches, each ending
in a pore. |
No spines on lateral line scales, which are somewhat larger than the
62
322 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
body scales, being vertically elongate. Teeth in jaws and usually on
vomer; palatines edentate. Three free pectoral rays. A row of spinose
plates along each side of the base of the dorsal fin.
This diagnosis, where amended, is based upon South African material
only.
The species of this genus appear to be fairly numerous, but they have
received relatively little attention from systematists, and the relationships
o not appear to be well established.
Of the features upon which differentiation may be based, the number
and nature of the preorbital spines appear to be of special significance,
but these have apparently received little attention, and they have not
been described as minutely as they merit. The shape of the spinous
dorsal is also of assistance, but is evidently somewhat variable even in one
species, e.g. in natalensis G. and T. the 3rd spine varies from 1-0-1-2 times
the length of the 2nd. The number of serrae on the Ist dorsal spine may
also prove of assistance in differentiation.
These fishes appear to be found below the 20-fathom line, and being
of small size and relatively few in number, have at present no economic
significance, in South Africa at least. All of our specimens have been
obtained in Natal waters, and may ultimately be found in other parts of
the Indo-Pacific area.
The South African species first obtained and described by Gilchrist
and Thompson (Ann. 8.A. Mus., 1914, vol. xiii, pp. 75, 76) were faurei
and natalensis. Barnard (Ann. 8.A. Mus., 1925, vol. xxi, p. 938) later
united these species under faurei, which has page-preference over
natalensis.
A careful study of the material believed to have been used by the
original authors reveals that natalensis should be revived, but chiefly upon
features not noticed by Gilchrist and Thompson. As will be shown below,
it is not indeed certain that the specimen now described as faurei is one
of those described by the original authors.
A new species, multispinosus, well differentiated from our and from
other Indo-Pacific species, has been added.
Key to the South African Species.
I. No keel on preopercle. Six or fewer preorbital spines. Pectorals
longer than head.
A. A patch of scales on breast. Two outer preorbital spines
abruptly longer than the subequal inner spines . . faurei.
B. Breast naked. Two outer preorbital spines not abruptly
longer than the graduated inner spines. . . . natalensis.
Ii. A strong keel on lower margin of preopercle. Ten or more spines
on each preorbital. Pectorals shorter than head . - multispinosus.
63
The Triglidae of South Africa. 323
In the following descriptions “length of head” is the distance from
the hind margin of the upper portion of the opercular flap (i.e. excluding
the projecting portion of the opercular spine) to the tip of the longest
preorbital spine. This is in most cases practically the same as the distance
from the hind margin of the opercular flap to the mid-point of the snout
between the preorbital extensions, measured obliquely.
Total length is measured from the tip of the longest preorbital spine
to the apex of the mid-caudal rays.
Lepidotrigla faurer G. and T.
(Plate XVI, A; Plate XVIII, A; Plate XIX, A, C.)
1914. Gilchrist and Thompson, Ann. §.A. Mus., vol. xiii, p. 75.
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 938.
Depth 4-1, length of head 3-1 in length of body. Eye 3-9, interorbital
4-9, snout (to tip of preorbital spine) 2-6, distance between apices of longest
preorbital spines 3-5 in head. Dorsal profile of snout steep, almost straight.
Snout between the projecting preorbitals scarcely emarginate. Pre-
orbitals each with 6 spines, the outer 2 large, subequal in length, the
inner 4 subequal, very abruptly smaller than the outer (Pl. XVIII, A).
No preopercular spine or keel. Two inconspicuous spines on supero-
anterior margin of orbit. A short transverse groove at the supero-posterior
margin of each orbit. Nuchal spines feeble, reach beyond the base of the
3rd dorsal spine. Opercular and humeral spines moderate. Jaws with
bands of small conical teeth. Vomerine teeth doubtful. Palatines edentate.
Pyloric caeca cannot be determined as the intestines have decomposed.
Seven gill-rakers plus several rudiments.
D VIII+16, inserted above the hinder third of the opercular flap.
Ist, 2nd, and 3rd spines serrate, 38 serrae on Ist spine, those on 3rd spine
very small. Ist spine 2-0, 2nd 1-7, 3rd 1-6 in length of head. 4th-6th
dorsal rays longest; 5th ray 1-9 in head, 5-7 in length of body; 14th ray
2-3 in head, 7-0 in length of body. 14th ray laid back just reaches upper
margin of caudal base.
A 16, inserted below the soft dorsal origin. Lower than soft dorsal.
P 11+3, 1-13 times head, 2°75 in length of body ; tip reaches to below
the base of the 7th dorsal ray, and to below the 29th lateral line scale.
First upper and lower three of connected rays simple. Longest free ray
1:3 in head, tip does not reach ventral tip.
Ventrals 1-2 in head, reach to base of 3rd anal ray.
Caudal slightly emarginate, peduncle 1-4 times eye.
Scales moderate, ctenoid. dorsally to level of humeral spine, graduated
into cycloid on ventral area (Pl. XIX, A and C). Lateral line scales 60;
64
324 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
tubes with 3-8 branches, longest above and below. No pores on body.
22 spines along dorsal base. Breast with a median patch of moderate
cycloid scales. |
Colour.—Preserved, uniform red-brown. Inner surface of pectorals
dark, with light margin above and below.
Length.—143 mm. (S.A. Mus., No. 11803).
Locality.—Natal, off Tugela mouth, in 20-63 fathoms.
In the South African Museum are eight adult specimens of Lepidotrigla,
these having been registered as the material, collected by the s.s. “‘ Pieter
Faure,” upon which Gilchrist and Thompson based their diagnoses of faurea
and of natalensis. These eight specimens have the following numbers,
lengths, etc.:—
S.A.M. No. . . | 11797 | 11797 | 11797 | 11803 | 11812 | 11812 | 11812 | 11812
Total length . | 178 | 174 | 160 | 143 | 167 | 162 | 155 | 135
Body length . | 154 | 149 | 134 | 120 | 144 | 136 | 1380 | 120
Dorsal spines . 9 9 8 8 9 8 8 8
According to the South African Museum register, two of the three of
No. 11797, plus No. 11803, are Gilchrist and Thompson’s orthotypes
of faurei, and one of those of No. 11812 is the holotype of natalensis.
According to Gilchrist and Thompson (loc. cit.), the three types of
faurei were of length 120 mm., 120 mm., and 146 mm. None of the above
are as small as 120 mm., unless these authors recorded body and not total
length. Otherwise, some of their measurements were erroneous, or there
has been a loss of specimens.
In the case of natalensis the holotype was stated to be 120 mm. in
length, and it is possibly the smallest of those of No. 11812. In any case,
there has obviously been some lack of care in the designation and pre-
servation of Gilchrist and Thompson’s orthotypes, which is particularly
regrettable in the present case, since a careful study of the eight specimens
reveals that No. 11803 is well differentiated from the remaining seven,
which are undoubtedly conspecific.
The original descriptions of fauret and of natalensis reveal nothing
of significance whereby these two species may be distinguished from each
other. L. faurei was stated to have “two strong spines” on each pre-
orbital, and ctenoid scales, and natalensis to have “a row of strong spines”
on each preorbital, and cycloid scales.
None of the eight South African Museum specimens have only two
preorbital spines, but in No. 11803 the two outer are very abruptly longer
than the subequal inner spines (Pl. XVIII, A). In none of the remaining
65
The Trighdae of South Africa. | 325
seven specimens are the two outer spines so abruptly differentiated from
the inner (Pl. XVIII, Band C). Further, in all of the specimens, the scales
above the lateral line are ctenoid, but cycloid on the ventral surface.
It is therefore impossible to select with certainty the orthotypes of
Gilchrist and Thompson, but there is no alternative except to revive
natalensis. In view of the nature of the preorbital spines of No. 11803,
this (a ripe female) is here designated the holotype of faurei, and the
remaining seven specimens (male and female) listed above may be designated
the lectotypes of natalensis, or, alternatively, No. 11812 of length 135 mm.
might be selected as the orthotype.
L. fauret is well differentiated from natalensis not only by the nature
of the preorbital spines, but also by the presence of scales on the breast,
and by the longer pectorals and soft dorsal rays. The scales of fawres are
more strongly denticulate than equivalent scales of natalensis.
It is, however, remarkable that among over 50 juvenile specimens,
taken with these eight adults, none show any signs of a scaly breast, and
should no further specimens of fawrei (as here defined) be discovered, it
may be suspected that it is merely an abnormal specimen of the form now
recognised as natalensis.
Lepidotrigla natalensis G. and T.
(Plate XVI, B; Plate XVIII, B, C; Plate XIX, B, D, H, F.)
1914. Gilchrist and Thompson, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xii, p. 76.
1925. Barnard, Ann. §.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 938 ( faures part ?).
Depth 4-0-5-0, length of head 3-0—-3-2 in length of body. Eye 3-4—4-0,
interorbital 4-0-5-0, snout (to tip of preorbital spine) 2-2-2-5, distance
between apices of longest preorbital spines 3-2-3-7 in head. Dorsal profile
of snout steep, almost straight. Snout between the projecting preorbitals
almost straight to emarginate. Preorbitals each with 4-6 spines, the outer
the largest, graduated to the inner, no abrupt change in size (Pl. XVIII,
B and C). The form and arrangement of these spines are somewhat
variable, and some specimens have 1-2 outer smaller spines at the base
of the largest. In very young specimens there are rarely more than 2-3
spines visible, and these are highly incurved, as if the spinose preorbital
extension develops from the inner side with growth. No marked pre-
opercular spine in adults; a small pungent spine in very young specimens,
which becomes more or less obsolete with growth. No preopercular keel.
Two inconspicuous spines on supero-anterior margin of orbit; there are
2-3 moderately prominent spines in juveniles which diminish with growth.
A short transverse groove at the supero-posterior margin of each orbit,
obscured on one or both sides in some specimens by an outgrowth of the
VOL. XXII, PART IV. 23
66
326 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
bony integument. Nuchal spines fairly strong, reach from almost below
to beyond the base of the 8rd dorsal spine. Opercular and humeral
spines moderate.
Jaws and vomer with bands of small conical teeth. Palatines edentate.
Gill-rakers 7-9 plus several rudiments. Pyloric caeca 6-8.
D VIII-IX +16, inserted above the hinder third of the operculum.
Ist, 2nd, and 3rd spines serrate, 42-46 serrae on first spine, those on 3rd
very small. 1st spine 1-7-2:1, 2nd 1-6-1-8, 3rd 1-5-1-7 in length of head.
3rd spine 1:03-1-2 times second. 4th-6th dorsal rays longest; 5th ray
2-1-2:5 in head, 6-2-7-0 in length of body. 14th ray 2-6-2-7 in head,
8-0-8-6 in length of body. 14th ray when laid back does not reach the
upper margin of the caudal base.
A 16, inserted below origin of soft dorsal, shape similar to that of soft
dorsal, but rays shorter.
P 11+3, 1-0-1-08 times head, 3-0-3-2 in length of body, tip reaches to
below the base of the 3rd—5th dorsal ray, and to below the 24th-25th
lateral line scale. First upper and lower three of connected rays simple.
Longest free ray 1-4 in head, does not reach ventral tip.
Ventrals 1-1—-1-2 in head, reach origin of anal or just beyond.
Caudal slightly emarginate, peduncle 1-2—1-4 times eye.
Scales moderate, weakly ctenoid dorsally to level of humeral spine,
graduated into cycloid on ventral area (Pl. XIX, B, D, and E). Lateral
line scales 58-61, tubes with 3-6 branches, with longest above and below
(Pl. XIX, F). Sometimes a few pores on body, most marked ventrally,
occasional scales perforated. 23-25 spines along dorsal base. Breast
naked.
Colour.—Preserved, uniform red-brown. Inner portion of pectorals
dark with light margin above and below.
Length.—35-178 mm.
Localhity.— Natal, off Tugela mouth, up to 63 fathoms.
Lepidotrigla multispinosus n. sp.
(Plates XVII and XX.)
Dorsal profile of snout undulate, abruptly descending, concave before
eyes, convex on anterior part, with abrupt descent at tip. Depth 4,
length of head 3-1 in length of body. Eye 4-0, interorbital 4-8, snout
2-0, postorbital part of head 3-1 in length of head.
Rostrals, with slight, widely diverging, medio-longitudinal ridge,
length 11 in head (measured between parallels of mid-point of snout and
tip of process). At the apex are small spines, mostly invested; on the
left process there are 5 small outer spines and 12 inner, the first (outer)
67
The Triglidae of South Africa. 327
of the 12 by far the largest; on the right are 10 spines, with the outer
longest (Pl. XVII, C). Distance between the apices of the longest rostral
spines 3 in head. Lateral keel of preorbital very faint, ending below and
not continuous with the preopercular ridge. A distinct ridge on lower
margin of preopercle, 1:3 times eye, slightly oblique downwards to the
angle, at which there is no spine. Two weak spines above the anterior
part of the orbit; one larger above the hind margin. On each side one
weak occipital, and two nuchal spines, the hinder the larger; apex of this
just reaches the base of the 3rd dorsal spine. Interorbital deeply concave.
The granules on the cheek radiate fan-wise backwards from below the front
margin of the eye; similarly on the*opercle from the base of the spine.
On the preorbital the arrangement is irregular. A short deep groove at
the supero-posterior margin of the orbit continuous, angularly bent back-
wards across the occiput. Humeral spine 3, free distal portion 6 in head.
Mouth sub-inferior, lower jaw included, maxilla 2-6 in head. Villiform
teeth in bands in both jaws, wider in upper jaw. Vomerine teeth doubtful.
None on other bones. Tongue adnate. Large pores on lower surface
of mandibles. No barbels. Branchiostegals 7. Membranes free from
isthmus. Gill-rakers 5, longest 5 in eye, plus 4 anterior rudiments.
Pyloric caeca 6, moderate.
D VIII+15, inserted above the hind margin of the operculum. Ist
spine 2-1, 2nd and 3rd subequal, 1-8 in head. 1st spine with 24 anterior
spinules, 2nd and 3rd weakly spinate. Base of Ist dorsal 1-8 in head.
Longest soft ray (5th-8th) 3-5 in head. Base of soft dorsal 1-1 times head.
On one side 23, on the other 25 spines below the dorsal.
A 16, originates below the origin of the soft dorsal.
P 11+38, 1:2 in head, reaches to below the base of the 7th dorsal ray.
Longest (upper) free ray, reaches almost to ventral tip, 1-4 in head.
V I, 5, reach to base of 3rd anal ray.
Caudal almost truncate, peduncle twice eye.
Scales (mostly shed) relatively small, ctenoid to below the pectoral
base, ventral scales with a single large denticle (Pl. XX, A, B, and C). 1.1.59.
Each tube with an upper and a lower oblique branch, and from one to four
smaller intermediate branches, each ending in a pore (Pl. XX, D). Breast
naked.
Colour.—Preserved, uniform red-brown. Pectorals dark.
Length.—160 mm.
Type in the Albany Museum.
This specimen was among certain fishes presented to the Albany Museum
by the Director of the Government Fisheries Survey. It was without
serial number or locality, although probably from Natal.
It is very clearly distinct from our other species, the preopercular keel,
68
328 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
the number of the preorbital spines, the long peduncle, the smaller scales,
and the relatively short 3rd dorsal spine being distinctive features. This
species appears to be well differentiated from all others by several features,
notably the deep excavation between the long multidentate preorbital
extensions and by the preopercular keel.
Genus CHELIDONICHTHYS Kaup.
1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 939.
Scales very small. Three free pectoral rays. Palatines edentate. A
row of spinose plates along the base of the dorsal fin. Lateral line without
spines, bifurcating at the caudal base. Preorbitals produced into spines.
Kurope, Africa, Japan, and Australia.
This genus appears to be quite valid, but is apparently not recognised
by some systematists.
As far as the South African species are concerned, Barnard’s treatment
requires no revision, the descriptions being in the main accurate and
detailed, and the differentiations clearly defined.
Key to the South. African Species.
I. Breast naked. Preorbitals ending in several (usually incurved) spines.
A. Eye not greater than interorbital width . . . . - capensis.
B. Eye distinctly greater than interorbital width . . . . kumu.
Il. Breast pitted. Preorbital ending in one large straight outer spine, with
inner concealed fused spines. . . . . . . - quekettr.
capensis C. and V. appears to be well differentiated from any European
species, as indicated by Barnard (loc. cit.). This species is of moderate
economic significance as a food-fish in South Africa.
Fic. 1.—Preorbital spines of Chelidonichthys queketti Rgn.
X =Inner fused spines, concealed by membrane.
Barnard (loc. cit.) has compared our specimens of kumu L. and G. with
Australian specimens, and his opinion that they are conspecific is here
accepted.
quekettt Rgn. is apparently an endemic species. Previous workers do
not appear to have noticed that, besides the large outer preorbital spine,
69
The Triglidae of South Africa. 329
there is on each side, concealed within the basal skinny membrane, an
inner process, which has obviously been produced by the coalescence of
from four to eight smaller spines (fig. 1).
Genus PERISTEDION Lac.
1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean Ichth., p. 470.
1913. Weber, Siboga Exp. Monogr. 57, p. 511.
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 944.
Body covered with bony plates, each bearing a spine. Mouth inferior,
lower jaw included, with barbels on the lower margin, the outer the longest.
Kach preorbital greatly enlarged and produced forwards as a spatuliform
process, with lateral keel continuous along lower margin of preopercle,
which ends in a spine. No teeth. Dorsal single or divided. Two free
pectoral rays.
Two species have been found in our area, adent Lloyd, and what has
hitherto (though with doubt by Barnard, loc. cit., p. 946) been accepted
as gracile G. and B. This latter species has now been found not to be
conspecific with gracile, and is here described as webert n. sp.
Many other species will doubtless be found in our area with more
intensive collecting, and it is not unlikely that at least some of the relatively
numerous Indo-Pacific forms will be among them.
Key to the South African Species.
I. No spines on dorsal surface of snout. 1.1. 34 . . . . webert.
II. One median and 4 smaller spines on dorsal surface of snout. 1.1. 30 . adeni.
Peristedion weberi Nn. Sp.
(Plate X XI.)
1924. Gilchrist and von Bonde, Fish. Mar. Surv. spec. Rep. ui, p. 22
(gracile).
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 945 (gracile ?).
Dorsal profile abruptly descending before upper half of eye, thereafter
slopes more gently. Depth 5-4 (5-0), length of head including rostral
process 2:4 (2-1), rostral process 8-5 (7:5) in length of body. (The figure
in brackets gives length in distance from base of caudal to tip of maxilla.)
Eye 5:5 (4-2), snout 2-9 (2-2), snout plus rostral process 1-6 (1-2), rostral
process 3-5 (2-7), interorbital width 6-5 (5:0) in length of head (including
rostral process; the figure in brackets is length in length of head without
rostral process).
Interorbital deeply concave, supraorbital ridge moderate, terminating ©
—70
330 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
in a flat spine, followed by two retrorse spines. A small serrated suborbital
keel terminating in a feeble blunt spinose projection. The widely diverging
rostral processes are continued backwards as serrated ridges, each ter-
minating at the angle of the preopercle, hind margin scarcely acute (PI. XXI,
Band C). No nasal or frontal spines. No spine at base of rostral process.
Numerous pores on head and along lower edge of mandible. 8-9 groups
of bi- or trifid barbels on each side of the lower jaw, longest fimbriate, equal
to orbit. (Pl. XXI, A, pencilled in on photograph.)
Maxilla 1-5 times eye. No teeth in jaws or on palate. Tongue adnate.
Gill-rakers 20, longest 2:5 in eye. 30 spinose plates on dorsal, 28 on
ventral surface. The anterior ventral plates are 2-3 times as long as
broad, 7.e. the width of the two plates is 1:15 in the length of one plate
(Pl. XXI, D). A rectangular portion of the second plates, five times wider
than long, fits into a recess in the anterior plates.
D VIII, 20, originates an eye-diameter behind eye, above the hind
margin of the operculum. 4th spine longest. Ist spine 3-5, 2nd and
3rd subequal 3-2, 4th 2-9 in length of head (without rostral process). Ist
ray 0:4, 2nd 4-3, 3rd 3-6, 4th-8th longest 3-2 in length of head (without
rostral process); thereafter the rays decrease.
A 20 (or I, 19), inserted below the base of the 4th dorsal ray. Shape
and length of raysasin dorsal. Base of anal 5-6 times longitudinal diameter
of eye.
P 11+2, 2:2, longer detached ray 1-6, lower 1:8 in head (without
rostral process). Upper detached ray reaches well beyond ventral tip.
Ventrals 1-9 in head (without rostral process) reach to vent. Membrane
for-half-length of last ray joined to body.
Caudal emarginate, mid-rays 1-1 times eye.
The lateral line descends abruptly from the shoulder to the middle of the
side. 34 spinose plates in the lateral line, 4 of these on the downward
portion. Lateral line tubes bifurcate, ending in a pore above and a pore
below the spine (Pl. XXI, E). The spines on the anterior 23 plates are
simple, those on the 11 posterior plates have an anterior antrorse and a
posterior retrorse point (Pl. XXI, E).
Colour.—Preserved, uniform light brown. Traces of dark mottling on
distal half of pectoral.
Length.—185 mm.
Locahity.— Off Delagoa Bay, in 260 fathoms.
Type in the Albany Museum.
A single specimen, labelled P. gracile G. and B., presented to the Albany
Museum by the Director of Fisheries Survey.
According to the Fisheries Survey records (Mar. Bio. Rep., 1921. (2),
p. 10), 8 specimens, subsequently identified as Peristedion gracile G. and B.
71
The Triglidae of South Africa. 331
(Gilchrist and von Bonde, Mar. Bio. Rep., 1924, 11, p. 22), were obtained
off Delagoa Bay, in 260 fathoms; the specimen described above was one
of these. :
| Barnard (loc. cit., p. 947) was very doubtful of the validity of this
identification, chiefly because gracile is'a Mexican species. This has led
me to make a critical examination of the specimen in the Albany Museum.
The original description of gracile (Goode and Bean, Ocean. Ichth.,
1896, p. 473, fig. 387) is based upon a single type specimen about 125 mm.
in length. (There are several discrepancies in this description.)
Although reasonably close to gracile, the specimen described above is
evidently not conspecific. The shape of the spinous dorsal, the longer
anal base, the bispinose posterior lateral line plates, and the number of
plates, as well as the ridge below the eye, all distinguish the present specimen
from gracile. There are also fewer gill-rakers, but Goode and Bean may
possibly have given the number (26) on the whole arch. The original
description of gracile does not say whether the rostral processes are divergent,
but the two species have much in common. This is another case of remark-
ably close relationship between Indo-Pacific and Atlantic species.
weber is also related to rivers-andersoni Alcock, and to nierstraszt Weber,
from the Indo-Pacific. I have seen only the original description and
figures of the former species (Alcock, 1894, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, xii,
pt. 2, p. 12, pl. vi, figs. 2, 2a, 2b). Dr. de Beaufort of Amsterdam has
kindly lent me one of the co-types of the latter species. An examination
of this indicates that nierstraszi is of doubtful validity, since the specimen
agrees in most particulars with the description of rwers-andersonz, especially
if the difference in size between the types of the two species be taken into
account, e.g. the posterior lateral line plates of this specimen of nierstraszt
are bispinose, and there is a small but distinct spine on the dorsal surface
of the base of each rostral process.
Since I have not seen a specimen of rivers-andersons, [| cannot venture
to state that nierstraszi is conspecific, although it appears quite possible.
In any case weberi is quite definitely distinct from either, in the nature
of the more slender and diverging rostral processes alone.
In regard to gracile, it would not indeed be surprising if a re-examination
of that species showed that weberi is even more closely related than appears
here. It is highly probable that gracile actually has bispinose posterior
lateral line plates.
Peristedion adeni Lloyd.
(Plate XXII.)
1907. Lloyd, Rec. Ind. Mus., vol. i, p. 8.
1908. Alcock, Illustr. Zool. Invest. Fishes, pl. xl, figs. 1, la.
72
332 Transactions of the Royal Soctety of South Africa.
1922. Gilchrist, Fish. Mar. Surv. Spec. Rep. iu, p. 78.
1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 945.
21925. Fowler, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., vol. Ixxvii, p. 256.
Dorsal profile of snout gently sloping before eye, scarcely concave.
Depth 5-1, length of head (without rostral process) 2-6, (with rostral process)
2-2 in length of body (without rostral process). Eye 5-5, interorbital width
4-7, snout (with rostral process) 1-4, (without rostral process) 1-7, rostral
process (broken) about 6 in length of head (excluding rostral process).
Interorbital moderately concave, supraorbital ridges moderate, with
a moderate spine on the posterior margin. On each side of the nape a
large spine, and a smaller one below. One median frontal spine. On
each side one small antorbital and one small nasal spine. The preorbital
process is large, flattened, with inner edges subparallel, outer margins
converging; the outer margins produced meet at an angle of 30°. Width
of process at base 1-2 in eye. The lateral edge of the preorbital process
is continued backwards as an undulate keel, terminating in the large pre-
opercular spine (Pl. XXII, B). There isa short and narrow suborbital keel.
Mouth large, maxilla 2:2 times eye. No teeth, tongue adnate. On
each side of the lower jaw there are 7-8 single small barbels, and one large
outer, fimbriate, 2-8 times eye. Gill-rakers 17, longest 3 in eye, anterior
rakers short but graduated.
21 spinose plates on ventral, 24 on dorsal surface. The anterior
ventral plates are together 1-1 times wider than the length, i.e. each
plate is 1-8 times longer than wide (Pl. XXII, C). 2nd plates each slightly
wider than long. A quadrangular portion of the 2nd plates, five times
wider than long, fits into a recess in the anterior plates.
D VII+15, inserted above hind margin of opercle, 3rd spine longest,
3-1 in head (without rostral process). 18 spinose plates along base.
A 15, inserted below the base of the 2nd dorsal ray, base five times
longitudinal diameter of eye.
P11+2, 1-9, upper detached ray 2-6 in head (without rostral process).
Tip of pectorals reaches to below the 11th lateral line plate.
Ventrals 2-0 in head (without rostral process), just reach vent. Mem-
brane joined to body.
Caudal damaged.
The lateral line descends abruptly from the shoulder to the middle of
the side. 30 lateral line plates, 5 of these on the downward portion.
The anterior 20 unispinose, the next 7 bispinose, and the last 3 unispinose
(Pl. XXII, D). The lateral line pores do not show externally.
Colour.—Preserved, uniform light brown, pectorals darker.
Length.—About 225 mm.
73
The Trighdae of South Africa. 333
Locality.— Natal.
A single specimen (S.A.M., No. 16223, from Mr. Bell Marley).
The specimen described above was identified as adent Lloyd by Dr.
Barnard (loc. cit.), with which identification I am provisionally in agreement.
There are, however, certain variations from the original diagnosis, the
most marked of which is the presence of the mid-posterior bispinose lateral
line plates. These are not as obvious as in the species (webert) previously
described, and may have escaped notice.
The original description makes no mention of the antorbital and nasal
spines. Barnard (loc. cit.) mentions these, but does not draw attention
to the fact that they were not present in the type diagnosis.
In this specimen the outer margins of the preorbital processes would
meet at a more acute angle than those of the type, 1.e. they are less markedly
convergent, but this feature is not of importance, and might vary con-
siderably. Further, there is no mention of the suborbital keel which is
present in this specimen.
These combined differences might, if established, justify the separation
of the present specimen from adeni, but as I have not access to any type
of that species, it would be unwise to venture this step.
Genus Tricia Art.
1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 943.
Body covered with very small scales, ctenoid above, cycloid on ventral
surface. Three free pectoral rays. Lateral line scales spinose. A row
of spinose plates along the base of the dorsal fin. No palatine teeth.
Lateral line bifurcates at the caudal base.
Trigloporus new sub-genus.
Distinguished from Trigla (sensu stricto) by the whole body (excepting
the chest) being covered with a complex system of reticulate tubes (each
ending in a pore), between rectilinear transverse multiporose tubes, as
well as by the multispinate nature of the lateral line scales. The pectorals
are also probably longer than in Trigla (Trigla).
Kurope and Africa.
Genotype, africana n. sp.
This sub-genus is proposed with considerable doubt as to its validity,
since I have seen, besides lineata Gmel., only one other Kuropean species
of Trigla (sensu lato), viz. gurnardus Linn. The extraordinarily highly
developed mucus canal system of lineata and of africana (which are clearly
congeneric in all respects), as well as the spination of the lateral line scales,
would appear to justify full generic distinction of the latter two species
74
334 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
from gurnardus. Against this, however, is an account of the species of
Trigla by Smitt (Skand. Fish., 1892, pt. 1, p. 194), of which I have seen
a brief abstract, in which he states that the species of this genus show
practically all stages of development of the mucus canal system intermediate
between that of gurnardus and that of lineata. Despite this, the difference
between these species is very striking, but since material to establish or
refute the absolute accuracy of Smitt’s statement is not available, as a
compromise, T'rigloporus is proposed as a sub-genus of Trigla.
Trigla (Trigloporus) africana n. sp.
(Plate XXIII.)
1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 943 (lineata Gmel.).
Dorsal profile of snout fairly steep, gently concave. Depth 4-5-5,
length of head 3-5-3-7 in length of body. Eye 4-3-4-5, interorbital 4-0-4:5,
snout 2-2, postorbital part of head 2-5, preorbital depth 2-4—2-5 in length
of head (measured from the hind edge of the operculum at the spine to
the snout tip). Front of snout rounded, or with slight median concavity.
The preorbitals are not produced, and there are no obvious spinules.
Interorbital deeply concave. Two to four backwardly radiating antero-
supraorbital ridges, each ending above the orbital margin in a small spine.
One to three minute supero-postorbital spinate ridges, without any cross
groove behind. One to three nuchal spines, the infero-posterior the
longest, just reaches below the base of the Ist dorsal spine. Humeral
spine very short, apex reaches beyond the hind margin of the operculum,
a distance equal to 5-5-6-2 in head. No keel on preorbital, the lower edge
of which is scarcely serrate. One set of backwardly radiating granules
from anterior margin of preorbitals; three radiating sets on cheek, lower
above end of maxilla, median largest in centre of cheek, and a smaller
group below hind margin of eye. Preopercular and opercular spines very
feeble. |
Maxilla extends to below the hind margin of the eye. No vomerine
teeth. The pores on the lower surface of the rami are arranged in 5-6
more or less regular longitudinal series, close set, but not aggregated into
groups.
D X+15-16, inserted above slightly in advance of hind margin of
operculum. Ist spine 1-4-1-5, 2nd, longest, 1-3-1-4, 3rd 1-4-1-5 in head.
Ist spine with a few rudimentary spinules or granules on the lower
anterior edge. Soft rays 2-5 in head.
A 15-16, inserted below the soft dorsal, rays similar to dorsal.
Pectorals 1-25-1-3 times head; tip reaches to below the 4th—5th dorsal
75
The Trighidae of South Africa. 335
ray. Longest free ray 1-1-1-2 in head, tip reaches to the posterior third
of the ventral. |
Ventrals 1-0-1:2 times head, reach to the base of the 2nd—4th anal
ray. |
Scales very small, strongly ctenoid above the lateral line (Pl. XXIII, C),
grade into cycloid on ventral surface. The whole of the body is covered
with the reticulate system of mucus canals described earlier, the transverse
rectilinear tubes resembling lateral folds of the skin between the scale
rows (Pl. XXIII, B). 67-70 scales in the lateral line, each scale bearing 2-5
spines, each much smaller than the single spine on the lateral line scales
of the species gurnardus Linn. Breast partly or wholly scaly.
Gill-rakers 7-8. Pyloric caeca 7-9.
Colour.—Red-brown, mottled and spotted, with 4-7 faint cross-bars.
Spinous and soft dorsal and caudal with irregular blotches. Ventrals
reddish. Pectorals bluish, with irregular cross-mottlings; free rays with
several brownish blotches.
Length.—Up to 230 mm.
Localities.—Cape St. Blaize, 26-33 fathoms; Algoa Bay, 40 fathoms;
Port Alfred, cast up on the shore.
Holotype, from Port Alfred, in the Albany Museum.
The South African specimens have hitherto been regarded as identical
with the European species lineata Gmelin.
Since I had access to no recent detailed descriptions of that species,
I forwarded a specimen of our species to Mr. Norman of the British Museum,
requesting him to compare it with the European form, and, if there appeared
any doubt of conspecificity, to send me material for comparison. He has
kindly sent this, and there appears to be little doubt that the South African
species is well differentiated.
The following table indicates some of the numerous features by which
the two species are differentiated :— |
lineata africana.
Pectoral times head _. ; ; 1-6 1-2-1:3
Humeral spine in head . ; ; 3-4 5-5-6-2
Eye in head ; ; ; ; 3°4 4-3-4:5
Pores on rami ; ; , . | In groups of 5-6 | In uniform rows
Breast ; ; . Naked Scaly
Lower margin of preorbitals ; ; Serrate Smooth
Dorsal spines ; 12 10
Anterior margin of first dorsal spine | Serrate whole Feebly serrate
length basally
76
336 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Besides these, the dorsal profile of the snout of lineata is much steeper,
and the angle subtended by the corners of the mouth at the symphysis is
much less than in our species, while the spination and granulations on
the head of lineata are much more marked than in africana, and the spinous
dorsal is markedly larger.
I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of the
South African Museum, for the very considerable assistance he continually
affords me in providing extracts from literature not available here, as
well as for freely lending material from the South African Museum collection.
Also to the Carnegie Research Fund, through the Research Grant Board
of South Africa, for generous financial assistance.
ALBANY MUSEvuM,
GRAHAMSTOWN,
June 1934.
Plate XVI.
pue
“WH
K) sisuappyou njbr.uopideT
L squosoider oinsy yore MOTEq SUI] OI,
ze "L pue
0 rainof op br.yoprdaT
V
Neill & Co., Lid,
J. L. B. Smith.
Trans. Roy. Soc. S.
J. iL. B. Smith,
Afr., Vol. XXII.
| .
HE
Plate XVII.
Neill & Co., Ltd.
C. Preorbital spines.
B. Dorsal view of head.
The line below each figure represents 1 cm.
(Type.)
Ispinasus N. sp.
A. Lepidotrigla mult
rans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXTI. Plate XVIII.
Preorbital spines, x 5, of Lepidotrigla species:
. fauret G. and T.
B and C. natalensis G. and T., showing limits of variation.
J. iL. B. Smith. Veill d Co., Ltd
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII.
‘i
-
:
‘ ih \
' i “ ‘
iN
4 \
a
Plate XIX.
‘
Scales of Lepidotrigla species:
A. Above lateral line, below spinous dorsal,
of faure: G. and T.
B. Equivalent scale of natalensis G. and T.
C. Ventral, behind breast, of faurer G. and T.
The line below each scale
J. L. B. Smith.
D. Equivalent scale of natalensis G. and T.
E. From behind pectoral base of natalensis
G. and T.
F. 31st lateral line scale of same.
represents 1 mm.
Neill & Co., Lid.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8S. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate XX
Scales of Lepidotrigla multispinosus n. sp.
A. Above lateral line, below spinous dorsal. _ C. Ventral, behind breast.
B. Behind pectoral base. D. 30th lateral line scale.
The line below each scale represents 1 mm.
J. L. B. Smith. Neill & Co., Ltd.
Plate X XI.
ni
Ha
Reet
wana
A. Peristedion weberi n. sp. D. Anterior ventral plates.
B. Ventral surface. KE. 21st (right)-27th lateral line spines from above.
C. Dorsal view of head. The line with each figure represents 1 cm.
J, LL. B. Smith. Veill & Co., Ltd.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate XXII
A. Peristedion adeni Lloyd. C. Anterior ventral plates.
B. Dorsal view of head. D. 20th (right)—24th lateral line spines from above.
The line below each figure represents | cm.
J. LL. B. Smith. Neill & Co., Lid.
Trans
Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII.
J. L. B. Smith,
Plate XXIII,
Neill & Co., Lid,
B. A portion of the skin below the lateral line, showing a few lateral line scales.
The line below B and below C represents 1 mm.
i (Type.)
° S1IZe e
Nat
1cana Nn. sp.
Trigla (Trigloporus) afr
C. Scale from below the spinous dorsal, above the lateral line.
A.
77.
Annals of the South African Museum. Vol. XXX. Part 5.
pp. 587-644. Pls. XV—XXII. February, 1935.
19. The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa.—By J. L. B.
SMITH, M.Se., Ph.D., Hon. Curator of Fishes, Albany Museum,
Grahamstown.
(With Plates XV-XXII and 17 Text-figures.)
[Members of the family Mugilidae—known in South Africa as ‘‘ Harders’’—are
an important edible commodity. Pappe refers to their value, and an enthusiastic
praise of them occurs in the memoirs of Lady Anne Barnard. From the culinary
point of view one species of Harder appears to be as good as another, but for
scientific purposes it is important to have the species occurring in our waters
defined as accurately as possible. In this paper Dr. J. L. B. Smith—a worthy
successor of Dr. Andrew Smith in the early part of last century—has tackled a
very difficult problem in systematics, which previous writers have left severely
alone.—Ep.]
Family MUGILIDAE.
The South African species all fall within the single wide genus
Mugil Linn. |
Genus Mueix Linn.
1861. Giinther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. i, p. 409, and p. 466 (Myzus).
1884. Jordan and Swain, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. vii, p. 261
(Liza).
1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, vol. iv, p. 78.
1920. Athanassoupoulos, Ann. Mus. Civ. Genoa (3), vol. viii,
p. 254 ff.
1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fish. Indo-Aust. Archip., vol. iv,
p. 229, and p. 264 (Myzxus).
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 302, and p. 311
(Myzxus), and p. 1023.
Body elongate, sub-cylindrical, more or less compressed posteriorly.
Head usually somewhat depressed, more or less cuneiform in trans-
verse section, with rounded apex below, generally completely scaly.
Scales usually ctenoid, sometimes cycloid, ventral scales more
markedly denticulate. Sometimes a secondary cycloid squamation
in the investing integument of the scales. No lateral line, but most
scales with one or more pits or canals, sometimes more numerous
on dorsal scales. Mouth small, terminal or sub-inferior, protractile.
Maxilla almost or entirely hidden beneath preorbital, excluded from
margin of upper jaw. Upper lip narrow or fleshy, with or without
VOL. XXX, PART 5. 40
78
588 Annals of the South African Museum.
papillae. Minute recurved teeth, generally compressed and apically
dilated, unicuspid, tricuspid, or spatulate, in one or more rows 1n
upper jaw, present or absent. Very minute slender pointed teeth
in lower jaw rarely present. Villiform teeth present or absent on
vomer, palatines, pterygoids, and tongue. The buccal membrane
sometimes with apically dilated cilia. A transverse concavity before
the vomer, obscured in some species. Tongue adnate to floor of
mouth.
Eyes fairly large, usually with adipose eyelids, rudimentary or
highly developed, better developed in adults.
Two dorsal fins; the first, of 4 pungent spines, with a pointed
basal scaly process inserted near middle of body, membrane from
last ray joined to body. Second dorsal of 1 weak spine and 7-10
rays, inserted above last fourth of body. Anal of 3 weak spines and
8-11 rays, inserted below second dorsal. Pectorals inserted slightly
or considerably above middle of side, more or less falcate, with or
without an elongate scaly axillary process. Ventrals abdominal,
joined by a membrane to the body and to one another. An elongate
cuneiform interventral scaly process. Caudal feebly emarginate to
forked. Fins, except first dorsal, more or less scaly.
Third and fourth upper pharyngeals fused, enlarged, with con-
voluted adipose base. Giull-openings wide, membranes separate, free
from isthmus. Gill-rakers very numerous, long and close-set; lower
pharyngeal rakers functional. Stomach tough and muscular, gizzard-
like; pyloric caeca few.
Mugil sensu lato is one of the earliest described genera of fishes,
but the natural relationships of the species appear to be but poorly
understood, and more or less unsatisfactory division of the wide
genus has several times been proposed.
Myzxus Guthr. (loc. cit.) was proposed for species with teeth in the
jaws, and (sometimes?) on the palate. The validity of this differ-
entiation has been accepted or rejected by systematists without
precise definition of the criteria upon which they base their opinions.
It is even not unusual to find an author stating that specimens of
Mugil sensu stricto (i.e. accepting Myrus) have teeth in the jaws.
Further, systematists frequently imply that teeth are absent from
the palatal bones of certain species, whereas even a casual examination
of their specimens would reveal that teeth are present.
The inaccuracy of many statements about the dentition is probably
in part due to the relatively small mouth of Mugil species, which
renders the examination of the palatal bones, especially in small
719
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 589
and preserved specimens, a troublesome matter. In illustration may
be quoted the fact that I have found no mention of lingual teeth,
which are by no means infrequently present.
In the South African species there appear to be all degrees between
the entire absence of teeth, and the state where most of the normally
dentigerous bones are fully dentate. Many of our species have teeth in
the jaws, and on the palatal bones, at least as well developed as those
present in, e.g., Elops Linn. In this latter genus the mouth is large.
In so far as our species are concerned, division of Mugil sensu lato
on the nature of the dentition alone would be not only of question-
able value, but also exceedingly difficult to define and justify. It is
not unlikely that this may well apply to all cases where Myzxus has
been recognised.
Jordan and Swain (loc. cit.) have proposed the genus Liza for
species which do not possess adipose eyelids (genotype: capito Cuv.),
while to Mugil sensu stricto are assigned those with eyelids. It has
already been pointed out by Jacot (Sci. Rep. Tohok. Imp. Univ.,
1930, vol. v, No. 4, p. 827) that division on this feature is of doubtful
value, since there is to be found almost every degree between obsolete
and fully developed eyelids. Further, it may be indicated that
adipose eyelids are, sometimes at least, better developed in the adult
than in the juvenile stadia, and, also that as far as the South African
species are concerned, the adults of all possess definite, if not always
highly developed, eyelids. |
It may be noted that species (such as cephalus Linn.) which possess
well developed eyelids probably always have an edentate vomer,
fairly concave anteriorly, while the transverse concavity anterior to
the vomer is not usually obscured (all of the American species of
Mugil appear to be of this type). These differences are nowhere
constant and sharp, nor can they be considered as a basis upon which
the genus may be divided.
As far as the South African species are concerned, it would be
exceedingly difficult to justify the separation of the three with well
developed eyelids from the remainder, and I do not propose to attempt
it. (But see note on scaling of cephalus, p. 19.)
No representatives of the closely related genera Agonostomus Benn.
and Cestraeus C. and V., appear to have been found in ourarea. The
latter at least appears to be well differentiated from Mugil.
The majority of museum collections of Mugil species appear to be
in a somewhat chaotic state, and few systematists care to undertake
positive identifications upon which reliance may be placed.
80
590 Annals of the South African Museum.
The early descriptions are hardly ever of real diagnostic value,
and the diagnoses of many species cannot be anything but provisional.
Added to this, differentiation between the species of this genus has
proved to be one of the most difficult problems which face the system-
atist; many of the features which in other groups provide a basis
for differentiation here appear to vary little between the different
species. The habits and environment of the different species show
little variation. It is found that such cases of obscured differentia-
tion sometimes occur in genera in which there is this uniformity of
habit and of habitat (e.g. Hpinephelus Blch.).
In recent literature there is a general tendency to reduce the
number of nominal species of Mugil. At the same time, it is remark-
able that the differentiation of those closely related is still frequently
based chiefly upon features, which can, by the examination of large
numbers of specimens, be shown to vary widely within any one, and
to overlap between related, species. The present confusion may
be attributed partly to the fact that where ordinary features have
apparently failed to show differentiation between what have quite
obviously been different species, systematists have assigned a purely
fictitious value to characters which are inconstant and unreliable.
The depth of the body, and of the caudal peduncle, the position of
insertion of the pectorals, and too restricted and undefined limits for
scale-counts, are, among others, comparatively useless features in this
genus. On the other hand, it is singular to find how many most
significant characters have been entirely overlooked. The nature of
the scales and of the teeth are of importance, but have not received the
attention they merit. The changes which take place with increase
in size have not been properly considered, and many nominal
species may prove to be merely different stadia of others. It is
remarkable that the highly characteristic form of the ventral
fins has not, in so far as I can determine, been regarded as worthy
of special description. This is a feature more of generic than specific
significance.
Where significant features have been overlooked, it is not unusual
to find that two closely related species may be confused. This is
probably a frequent occurrence with Mugil species, and is in part due
to the fact that the features of doubtful validity upon which differ-
entiation is based often vary widely, and the limits can actually
never be clearly defined.
A case in point is that of auratus Risso, which has been included
in our fauna-list upon. the authority of Boulenger (loc. cit., p. 86),
81
The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 591
who identified * as this species a specimen in the South African
Museum from East London. In this he was followed by Barnard
(loc. cit., p. 308). Specimens which agree more or less with the usual
diagnosis of auratus have been found to be the most abundant form
from Knysna eastwards. When numbers of these were examined,
it was obvious that two well-differentiated species were present,
neither of which is auratus, nor can either be identified with any
existing species. The one species (canaliculatus n. sp.) is easily
recognised by the multicanaliculate dorsal scales, the other (éri-
cuspidens n. sp.) by the relatively large tricuspid teeth, besides
many other features in each case.
The South African species have stood in need of critical revision.
Of the fourteen (incl. Myzus) hitherto admitted to our fauna-list,
four, viz. auratus Risso, speiglert Blkr., saliens Risso, and cunnes ius
C. and V., have now been found not valid, while strongylocephalus Rich.,
oligolepis Blkr., tricuspidens n. sp., and canaliculatus n. sp. have been
added, and euronotus A. Smith, up to now regarded as a synonym of
saliens, has been revived. M. diadema G. and T. has been found to
be identical with compressus Gnthr., and ceylonensis Gnthr. with
buchanant Blkr. Myzxus barnardi G. and T. has been found to be a
synonym of Mugil cephalus Linn.
It may be as well to state that of definite purpose there have been
omitted from most of the descriptions those details which, by the
examination of a number of specimens, have been found to vary
widely, and which can have but little significance. Among these
may be mentioned the nature of the dorsal and ventral profiles, of
the interorbital, and the degree of compression of the body. Varia-
tion in these may result from different methods of preservation, as
well as in part from varying degrees of sexual maturity.
It should be emphasised that a critical revision of Mugil. species,
based upon an adequate world collection, is long overdue. Such a
revision would be of the greatest value to systematists, if only because
Mugil is almost cosmopolitan in distribution, and local specimens are
contained in probably every Museum collection throughout the world.
It is frankly admitted that the identification of many of our species
with those from other ‘parts is provisional only. Not only are the
majority of descriptions in the somewhat scanty literature available
to me of little diagnostic value, but it has not been possible to secure
* It may be remarked that there is no record of this identification in the 8.A.
Museum. Boulenger identified other species from specimens in this Museum, of
which records have been kept.
82
592 Annals of the South African Museum.
the desired number of identified specimens from other parts for
examination and comparison. The final pronouncement of the
identity of our species must be left to some worker who has at his
disposal adequate world material.
The chief aim of the present work has been to establish clearly the
differentiation of the South African species.
It will be noticed that there are very few positive statements about
synonymy, where such would be based upon descriptions only. I
have nevertheless made an exhaustive study of descriptions of our,
and of related, species, but in most cases the lack of significant detail
would render opinions based upon these of little value. |
The localities given in the present work are those from which the
specimens were actually obtained. The sizes given are those of the
specimens examined.
Certain characteristic features of Mugil species which have received
little or no attention from systematists, but which appear to be of
considerable taxonomic significance, are described below.
GROWTH CHANGES.
There is the usual variation with age in the relative size of the eye,
and of the dimensional relationships of the parts of the head. The
shape of the dorsal and of the anal fin undergoes considerable modi-
fication with growth in some species, e.g. buchanani (q.v.). The
anterior dorsal and anal rays, the caudal lobes, the pectorals, the
pectoral axillary scale, and the adipose eyelids, all appear to increase
somewhat in relative size with growth. The exposed surface on the
chin increases in size in some species, e.g. buchanan, and the scaling
on the vertical fins appears to become denser. The origin of the
first dorsal frequently appears to move towards the snout, as if there
is a somewhat greater increase of the posterior than of the anterior
half of the body with growth.
SCALES.
The scales may be cycloid or ctenoid, and in some cases (e.g.
euronotus) both are present. The denticulations are generally larger,
and greater in extent, on scales from the ventral area. The ventral
scales are always more elongate than those from the dorsal area.
The form of equivalent scales has been found to be sometimes
highly characteristic, and in several cases immediately diagnostic.
The multicanaliculate scales of canaliculatus enable this species to
83
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 593
be distinguished at a glance from all others from South Africa. The
dorsal scales of capito are, from the early mid-juvenile stadia, denticu-
late, whereas those of the closely related species euronotus are cycloid.
Further, the mucus canals of the former species are long and narrow,
whereas those of the latter are short and wide.
The young of those species I have examined have cycloid scales,
the denticulations appearing as a small mid-posterior patch, which
rapidly extends over the whole area (Pl. XIX, A-E, for capite).
Two species, cephalus Linn. and strongylocephalus Rich., are remark-
able in possessing two distinct squamations. The main scales are
large. In the investing mesodermal integument is found a secondary
squamation of minute cycloid scales, which are visible upon the sur-
face of the primary scales (Pl. XV, A and B). This is especially well
developed over the occipital area, while, in cephalus, the largest of
these scales of secondary origin are to be found in the thickened dermal
investment of the axillary scales of the pectoral and ventral fins.
Enlarged photographs of the scales of most of the South African
species are reproduced in Plates XVII-XX, XXII.
ScaLy Basat Process oF First DORSAL.
One feature of significance is the relative length of the pointed
scaly process at the base of the first dorsal fin. Not only does the
relative length of this appear to be remarkably constant at all stages
in any one species, but it differs between the species, so as to afford
in some cases a reliable guide to differentiation. Its use was ap-
parently first proposed by Ninni * (Considerazioni sul genere Mugil,
Venezia, 1909), but I have not seen this paper, and do not know how
he proposed to use it. Later authors have apparently not considered
this feature of any value.
DENTITION.
The teeth are always very small, and are in some species very
- minute, so as to resemble partly or wholly ossified dermal cilia, but
they are always, in the upper jaw at least, definitely sub-labial, with
the bases adnate to the premaxilla. These premaxillary teeth vary
both in size and shape, and have been found to be frequently char-
acteristic, and in some species immediately diagnostic: the tricuspid
teeth of tricuspidens are larger than those of most others, and enable
this species to be easily distinguished.
* Vide Athanassoupoulos, Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen., 1920, xlviii, p. 255.
84
594 Annals of the South African Museum.
The teeth appear to be equally developed at all stages. In older
individuals they may be partly hidden by the development of infra-
labial spongy tissue, which has probably given rise to the idea that
teeth are sometimes better developed in the young, since they are
then frequently exsert and more easily visible.
In order to determine the nature of the premaxillary teeth, when
they are partly or completely hidden, the following procedure has
been found satisfactory. With a sharp pair of fine scissors a thin
strip of the upper jaw is snipped off, and soaked for some minutes in
rectified spirit. The strip is then placed on a slide and allowed to
dry thoroughly. This causes retraction of the enveloping tissue,
and leaves the teeth clearly visible.
The teeth possess elongated, dilated, bases.
The teeth of certain species have brown apices. This applies
especially to those such as euronotus and tricuspidens, in which they
are apically dilated, like those of the fresh-water Cichlidae. It is
interesting to note that these species are almost wholly fluviatile.
Enlarged photographs of characteristic forms of premaxillary
teeth are reproduced in Plate XVII, C-G.
Palatal and lingual teeth are usually villiform or obtusely conical.
In old specimens they may be obscured by a layer of mucus, but may
be detected by means of a dissecting needle. Those on the tongue
are usually present in adjoining patches round the anterior margin,
and occasionally also over the slight median ridge of this organ
(fig. 8, A).
VENTRAL FINS.
As has been noted previously, the form of the ventrals is highly
characteristic, and may prove of use as a generic feature.
The last ray of each fin is connected for a part of its length to the
body by a membrane, which is also joined to that from the opposing
fin (fig. 1, A and B). This forms a hollow pouch, sub-triangular in
cross-section. Over this pouch, and of the same length, or shorter,
projects a cuneiform inter-ventral scaly process, consisting usually
of five or six series of scales, the apical scale being elongate and
pointed (fig. 1, sp.).
The precise function of this peculiar structure is not clear. It is
possible that the increased rigidity imparted to the distended ventrals
may play some important part in the leaping powers of these fishes.
When the. fish moves rapidly, the pressure of the water upon
the inclined plane of the obliquely extended ventrals would tend
85
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 595
to divert the anterior part of the body upwards. The larger the
ventrals, and the more anterior their insertion, the greater will be
this effect.
Fie. 1.—Diagram to show the structure of the ventral fins of Mugil species—
A, lateral view; B, ventral view. mv, membrane connecting ventrals *; mb,
membrane joined to body; sp, interventral scaly process.
GILLS AND GILL-RAKERS.
The gill-rakers to the three inner arches are set at right angles to
the vertical plane of the gill-arches. The rakers themselves are
extremely close-set and form a plane surface, the rigidity of each
plane being assisted by the enmeshing of setiform processes which
are present on the adjacent basal portions of each raker. The rakers
do not interdigitate with those from the adjacent arch, but those of
each side of each arch form a gently curved edge, which coincides
exactly with that from the adjacent arch (Pl. XV, C).
The lower pharyngeal area is divided by a raised medio-longitudinal
ridge, of which a longitudinally grooved anterior dilation is immedi-
ately posterior to the basibranchial cartilage. Hach half of the
lower pharyngeal area is concave, the enlarged upper pharyngeals
fitting exactly into the two concavities. The lower pharyngeal
bones are themselves very thin, long, curved, and fairly narrow:
along the middle of the upper surface of each is a cartilaginous ridge,
which bears on each side of the apex, as a continuous curved plane,
lamellae exactly similar in structure to, but longer than, the rakers
on the functional gill-arches. The edge of the exterior series meets
that of the inner series of rakers from the inner functional gill-arch.
The inner edge of the inner series of these lamellae is adnate to the
cutaneous margin of the medio-longitudinal pharyngeal ridge, while
* Slightly exaggerated.
86
596 Annals of the South African Museum.
the lower margins of both series of lamellae are adnate to the upper
margin of the pharyngeals, the outer series projecting some distance
into the branchial cavity (Pl. XV, C).
It may be presumed that these pharyngeal lamellae have been
developed from the true rakers originally present on the arch now
modified to form the pharyngeals. If so, it is an interesting example
of a surviving integral portion of a highly modified structure, having
retained the original form and function despite the profound struc-
tural and functional modification of the main structure.
DIMENSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, ETC.
In order that dimensional relationships and scale-counts shall
have their full value, it is essential that the precise limits should be
defined. In the present paper the following have been employed :—
Length of Head.—This is measured with dividers in a straight line
from the tip of the retracted snout to the hindmost point of the
opercular margin on the level of the upper margin of the pectoral
base, 2.e. 1t is measured diagonally, and not in profile.
Head without snout is measured from the hind margin of the head
to the anterior margin of the orbit.
Length of Pectoral—This is employed as an important diagnostic
character, and is measured from the body to the tip of the pectoral,
when the latter is held at right angles to the side.
Caudal Base.—This is taken as the base of the mid-caudal rays,
which is obscured by the scaling. The body scales diminish very
little in size up to this point, the scales on the basal portion of the rays
being generally abruptly smaller. In fresh specimens the bases of
the rays are easily visible if the caudal be distended and viewed
against a light. In preserved specimens this point is less easily
ascertainable, but may generally be determined by similar means.
The diagnostic scale-counts employed in the present work may quite
easily be made with sufficient accuracy.
Scales : Lateral Series.—-This is taken as the number of scales in
the first continuous series above the axil of the pectoral, from directly
above the hind margin of the head (see Length of Head, above) to the
caudal base (q.v.). The first series above the axil is not usually
continuous, being interrupted at the 3rd or 4th scale, whereas
the next series above is usually regular, often starting from above
the hind margin of the head in a gentle downward curve.
Scales : Transverse Series.—This count can have but little signifi-
87
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 597
cance, since the number of transverse series varies very little between
the species. The counts given in this work are taken from before
the origin of the first dorsal to the mid-line of the belly.
Scales: Predorsal.—All previous counts of the predorsal scales
have been taken from the origin of the first dorsal to the snout.
Since the dorsal cephalic squamation is rarely ever regular, counts
between these limits are of little value in the absence of precise
definition of the method of counting.
The number of predorsal scales does not appear to be of any special
significance, as apart from the number in lateral series, but the
number of series between the
origin of the first dorsal and
the point above the hind margin
of the head has in each case
been recorded.
Angle of Lower Jaw.—This
does not alone appear to be of
any special significance, but
as most workers make some
statement about the nature
of. this feature, it appears
advisable to follow suit. The
majority of statements appear Fic. 2.—Diagram of chin of a specimen of
to have been based upon casual Mugil. To show how the angle of the
mouth is taken.
estimations, which can . have
but little value, and actual diagrams in illustration of the angle of
the mouth do not infrequently fail to agree with corresponding
statements. I have therefore judged it wise to record the actual
angle subtended by the corners of the mouth at the symphysis,
which is not affected by the nature of the outline of the jaw,
this being sometimes rounded, and sometimes angular. This angle
has been measured by means of a simple goniometer devised and
constructed for this purpose.
Origin of first Dorsal (1) to Snout, (2) to Caudal Base, (3) te Hind
Margin of Caudal Rays.—These are measured with dividers, one point
at the anterior point of the base of the first dorsal spine, and the
other (1) at the tip of the snout, (2) at the mid-point (lateral) of the
caudal base, and (3) at the actual hind margin of the mid-caudal
rays, respectively.
Length of Pointed Basal Scaly Process of Furst Dorsal.—This is
measured from the anterior point of the base of the first dorsal spine _
88
598 Annals of the South African Museum.
to the hindmost point (apex) of the scaly process. When the two
processes are unequal in length, the longer is measured.
Length of snout is measured obliquely from the tip of the snout to
the anterior margin of the orbit.
Total length is measured from the tip of the snout to the hind
margin of the mid-caudal rays.
Other measurements are taken in the usual manner.
The interventral scaly process varies very little in relative length
between the species, averaging three in head.
Key to the South African species.
I. Adipose eyelids well developed, the posterior covering more
than half of the posterior width of the iris, in some cases
reaching to hind margin of pupil.
A. Scales 37-42. Pectorals not longer than head without
snout.*
1, Anal rays 7-8. 2nd dorsal not scaly. Anterior
eyelid well developed . cephalus.
2. Anal rays 9. 2nd dorsal scaly. Anterior ‘eyelid
feeble. . robustus.
B. Scales 33-35. Pectorals longer than head without
snout * . . . strongylocephalus.
IJ. Adipose eyelids narrow or rudimentary, better visible in
adults, round the outer margin of the eye, covering not
more than half of the posterior portion of the iris.
A. Prominent papillae in several series on lower margin of
upper lip, which is very deep at snout tip.
(Scales 37-40) . . . . . . crentlabis.
B. No papillae on upper lip, which is not, or “scarcely,
more than 4 of eye deep at snout tip.
1. Scales 41-49.
a. Pectorals not longer than head without
snout.* Palatine teeth present.
x. Scale at base of first dorsal 6-5-8 in
distance from origin of first dorsal
to snout tip. Soft dorsal com-
pletely scaly . euronotus.
y. Scale at base of first dorsal 4-5 in
distance from origin of first dorsal
to snout tip. Soft dorsal not
scaly posteriorly . . capito.
b. Pectorals longer (in adults much longer) than
head without snout.* No palatine teeth.
x. Teeth comparatively large, tricuspid.
Pectorals 1-2-1-3in head. Maxilla
wellexposed . . . . tricuspidens.,
89
The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 599
y. Teeth not tricuspid, small. Pectorals
1-0-1:1 in head. Maxilla com-
pletely concealed . . . seheli.
2. Scales 29-40.
a. End of maxilla concealed.
African species by many features, chief of which are the very short
scaly process at the base of the first dorsal fin and the characteristic
premaxillary teeth. These, with the scaly nature of the soft dorsal
and the markedly larger eye, serve to distinguish this species immedi-
ately from capito in all stadia.
On our southern coasts, in my experience, euronotus rarely occurs
in the sea. I have caught and identified well over a thousand
specimens of Mugil, from the sea, from estuaries, and from fresh
water. Only two specimens of this species have been found in the
sea; in each case near the mouth of a tidal river, and in one case
after a flood. In tidal estuaries ewronotus is not usually found near
the sea but high up the river, where the salinity of the water is low.
Curiously enough, in Natal waters the species appears to be as
commonly found in the sea itself.
In the Eastern Province euronotus occurs in most of the fresh
waters, in most cases in isolated pools which have no connection
with the sea. The species appears to thrive in dams, into which it
has been introduced. It appears to breed freely in such waters, and
many farmers ensure a regular supply of fresh fish by stocking dams
or pools on their farms. |
Mugil capito Cuv.
(Plates XVII, C; XIX, A-F.)
1861. Giinther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. m1, p. 439.
1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, vol. iv, p. 83, fig. 49.
1918. Athanassoupoulos, Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen., vol. xlvi, p. 26.
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 304.
* euronotus (=S. x S.E. wind) may, however, refer indirectly to the part of
our area, 1.e. the south and south-eastern coastal regions, in which this species
occurs, although Smith states that it inhabits the seas of the eastern and western
coasts. Smith may have meant eurynotus.
104
614 Annals of the South African Museum.
Depth 3-8-4-4, length of head 3-6-4-2 (J.) in length of body. Kye
4-7 (J.)-6:3 (Ad.), snout 3-2-3-6, interorbital width 2:2-2-7, and
postorbital length 1-8-1-9 in length of head. Adipose eyelids rudh-
mentary, scarcely visible in juveniles, better developed in adults,
but never extending further than the outer rim of the iris. Nostrils
4 of eye diameter apart, anterior midway between anterior border
of eye and profile of snout tip. Lower margin of preorbital scarcely
bent, sometimes with a very small notch, lower and hinder margins
serrate, scaly. End of maxilla well exposed. Angle of lower jaw
93-103°, outline of jaw subangular in juveniles, more rounded in
Fie. 8.—Diagram to show the dentition of Mugil capito. A, tongue; B, upper
jaw and palate. M, maxilla; Pl, palatines; Pm, premaxilla; Pt, pterygoids;
Vm, vomer. Dentate areas dotted.
adults. Symphysial knob double. Upper lip fairly thin, width at
snout apex 3-Dineye. Slightly flattened, recurved, subspatulate teeth
in a single fairly widely spaced row in the upper jaw (Pl. XVII, C).
Lower jaw edentate. Villiform teeth on vomer, palatines, pterygoids,
and tongue (fig. 8).
D IV +I, 8-9. First dorsal inserted nearer tip of snout than base
of caudal, 1-06—-1-1 times as far from the latter as from the former,
1:30-1:38 times as far from the hind margin of the mid-caudal rays
as from the tip of the snout. First spine 1-7-2-0, base of first dorsal
2-1-2-5 in head. Distance from origin of first to origin of second
dorsal 0-95-1-2 (J.) in head. First dorsal inserted above the 14th—
16th, second above the 28th—30th lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale
extends behind origin of first dorsal 2-3-2-6 in head, 2:0-2-6 in distance
from origin of first to origin of second dorsal, 4-5 in distance from
105
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 615
origin of first dorsal to tip of snout. Longest soft ray 1-9-2-3, base
of second dorsal 2-9-3-5 in head. Last ray slightly longer than
penultimate, fin slightly elevated anteriorly, edge gently concave.
Second dorsal scaly basally and anteriorly only.
A III, 9. Inserted slightly in advance of second dorsal, below the
26th-29th lateral scale. Longest ray 1-8-2-3 in head. In shape
fin resembles dorsal. Scaly anteriorly and basally.
P 16-18, 1-45-1-75 in head (usually 1-6—1-7), tip reaches to the
10th-12th lateral scale. Fin scarcely ever as long as postorbital
plus eye, inserted 1-5-2-3 times as far from the ventral as from the
N-
Fic. 9.—Mugil capito Cuv. (see note, fig. 3).
dorsal profile. Axillary scale 2-7 (Ad.)-4-5 in length of pectoral,
obscure in young specimens.
Ventrals 1-6 (J.)-1-9 in head, inserted below midway between origin
of first dorsal and hind margin of head, or slightly behind or before.
Axillary scale 3-3-3-6 in head. Edge of fin truncate.
Caudal moderately forked, upper lobe slightly longer, mid-rays
2-1-2-5 in head.
Scales ctenoid (Pl. XIX, E and F), predorsal scales 1-0-1-2 (Ad.)
times as long as wide. Mucus canal long and narrow. Very young
fishes have cycloid dorsal scales, the denticulations develop with
growth (Pl. XIX, A-E), lr. 44-48, ltr. 15-16; 4-5 cheek scales, 15-17
predorsal to above the hind margin of the head.
Colour.—Greenish to dull brown above, silvery below. Sometimes
indistinct longitudinal streaks. Opercles usually with golden blotch.
Localities.—Walfisch Bay, Lambert’s Bay, Table Bay, False Bay,
Cape Agulhas, Port Beaufort, Knysna, Plettenberg Bay, Port Eliza-
beth, Port Alfred, Great Fish Point, East London, Mazeppa Bay,
Durban, Sinkwazi. Also in tidal rivers.
106
616 Annals of the South African Museum.
Length.—Up to 405 mm.
Fifty-five specimens, from 50 mm. up, examined.
It appears to be reasonably certain that our specimens should
be assigned to capito Cuv.
I have received a number of specimens from the Zoological Station,
Naples, among which is one very likely conspecific with the species
I have here designated capito. Specimens of capito, auratus, and
saliens were included, but the preservative employed in the package
had unfortunately destroyed all the labels, so that I am unable to
say which specimen was actually identified in Naples as capito. I
have also examined a specimen of reputed capito from Holland, but
this is not conspecific; if it 1s correctly named, our species is not
capito. This specimen has pectoral 1:35 in head and has no axillary
pectoral process, and in general outlines resembles auratus Risso
rather than capito or saliens.
Since, as is indicated below, I find it impossible from the literature
to find any certain basis for the differentiation of saliens from
capito, the most that can be said is that our specimens are probably
identical with the latter species.
Boulenger identified a specimen (No. 12048) in the 8.A. Museum
as capito Cuv. He also identified as saliens Risso another specimen
(No. 10157, from Table Bay), which I cannot by any means whatso-
ever differentiate from the former; the latter even possesses a well-
developed scaly process in the pectoral axil, the absence of which in
saliens Boulenger (loc. cit.) makes his Key characteristic for differentia-
tion from capito. |
Giinther (loc. cit.) appears to have been satisfied that specimens
from the Cape were identical with the European capito, but he re-
marked that Smith’s specimens were badly stuffed, and of little use
as types or for comparison—a fact which has recently been confirmed
by a private communication from Mr. Norman of the British Museum.
If one may Judge from the literature, a certain amount of mystery
surrounds the identity of saliens. Giinther (loc. cit., p. 443) did not
appear to be very certain of this species, and the features upon which
he based his differentiation of saliens from capito (and from auratus)
are inconstant and unreliable. Boulenger (F.W.F. Africa, loc. cit.)
was obviously uncertain of saliens, and it may be remarked that this
is the only African Mugil species of which he gives no figure. Barnard
has evidently merely followed Boulenger in regard to the differentia-
tion of saliens from capito.
Athanassoupoulos (loc. cit.) has endeavoured to elucidate this,
107
Lhe Foshes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 617
but his conclusions have shed little light upon the problem, for he
relies in his Key chiefly upon the supposed fact that the mouth of
sahens is more convex than that of capito, which is at best of little
practical value, and unlikely to be constant even were more precise
details provided. This author has also proposed to use as diagnostic
features certain dimensional relationships which would have to be
tested over a wider range of stadia before their value can be accepted.
Differentiation between capito and saliens, based solely upon the
presence or absence of the axillary process of the pectoral, has been
accepted by many systematists, but does not appear to be absolute.
Most authors state that this axillary process is present in capito
but absent in saliens, whereas Athanassoupoulos says that the latter
species actually has a short process in the axil. As far as the South
African specimens are concerned, a large process is apparent only
in adults of capito. Juveniles have a very short process in the axil,
and in a long and regular series of all stadia it may be seen that the
size and length of this process increases regularly with age. In pre-
served juvenile and half-grown specimens it is often exceedingly
difficult to be certain whether the process is present or not, and so
inconstant and unreliable is this feature that I should not venture
to use it as a sole basis for differentiation in the present case.
Not only does it appear certain that salens, as distinct from
capito, does not occur in our area, but I have come, from the literature
at my disposal, to doubt the validity of that species. At all events,
it would appear that those who have specimens of capito, and of
reputed saliens, must present stronger evidence for the maintenance
of the latter species than has hitherto appeared. Athanassoupoulos
states that the basal scale of the first dorsal of salens is shorter than
the base of this fin, whereas in capito it is slightly shorter to slightly
longer than the base, but he has given no quantitative data. This
may eventually prove to be the key feature of any established
differentiation. Among the specimens from Naples are two which
agree in some respects with the general diagnosis of saliens. There
is no process, or a very small one, in the axil, and the preorbital is
deeply notched; the mouth is more obtuse, and the scale at the base
of the first dorsal is relatively longer than in capito, while the pectorals
are 1-3-1-35 in head. I cannot venture to make any statement about
the identity of these specimens, but they are certainly different from
any species from South Africa which I have examined.
M. capito appears to be found throughout the greater part of our
area, being most abundant on the West coast and round the Cape as far
108
618 Annals of the South African Museum.
as Port Beaufort, in which parts it is the most important Mugil
species.
It is distinguished from other South African species by the scale-
count, the very short pectorals, the scarcely obtuse mouth, and the
well-exposed maxillary. |
Mugil tricuspidens n. sp.
(Plates XVII, A, F, G; XVIII, G, H.)
1849. Smith, Illus. §8.A. Pisces, pl. xxx, fig. 1 (capensis C. & V.).
1853. Pappe, Edible Fish. C.G.H., p. 27 (multilineatus).
1861. Giinther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. i, p. 443 (salvens part).
1925. Barnard, Ann. §.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 308 (auratus part).
Depth 4-0-4:5, length of head 4-0 (J.)-4-4 (Ad.) in length of body.
Eye 4:6 (J.)-5-4 (Ad.), snout 3-4-3-7, interorbital width 2-0-2-5, post-
orbital length 1-8-2-0 in length of head. Adipose eyelids rudi-
mentary, scarcely visible in juveniles, clearly visible in adults,
posterior better developed. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter apart,
anterior midway between front margin of eye and tip of snout
profile. Lower margin of preorbital undulate, lower and hinder edge
serrate. End of maxilla clearly visible. Angle of lower jaw 103-108°,
outline of jaw rounded. Symphysial knob indistinctly double.
Upper lip thin, width at apex of snout 3-4ineye. Flattened, apically
dilated, recurved, tricuspid teeth (Pl. XVII, G) in a single series in
upper jaw: in juveniles the teeth are more dilated, and the central
cusp is spatulate (Pl. XVII, F). When viewed in fresh specimens,
usually the central cusp only shows. The lip must be pushed back
before the basal cusps are to be seen. The relatively large size of
the teeth, and the wide spacing of the central cusps are distinctive
characters. Lower jaw edentate. Villiform teeth on vomer, ptery-
goids, and tongue. Palatines edentate. In adults the membrane of
the roof of the mouth, and of the tongue, have close-set, apically
dilated, tricuspid cilia.
D IV +I, 8. First dorsal inserted 1-0 (J.)-1-07 times as far from
base of caudal as from tip of snout, 1-25-1-35 times as far from hind
margin of the mid-caudal rays as from tip of snout. First spine
1-9-2-1, base of first dorsal 2-1-2-5 in head. Distance from origin
of first to origin of second dorsal 1-0-1-1 times head. First dorsal
inserted above the 15th or 16th, second above the 28th or 29th
lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends behind origin of first
dorsal, 2-5-2-8 in head, 5-4—5-8 in distance from snout tip to origin
109
The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 619
of first dorsal, 2-4-2-8 in distance from origin of first to origin of
second dorsal. Second soft ray 1-5-1-8, base of second dorsal 2-6-2:8
in head. Last ray longer than penultimate, fin anteriorly elevated,
sub-falcate, edge concave. Second dorsal scaly only anteriorly and
basally.
A III, 9, inserted slightly in advance of second dorsal, below the
27th—28th lateral scale. Second ray 1-6-1-8 in head, last ray longer
than penultimate; edge of fin concave; scaly.
P 18, 1-2-1-3 in head, tip reaches to the 11th or 12th lateral scale,
inserted 1-6-2-0 times as far from the ventral as from the dorsal
\
-"
--
-
oo
~~
~~
~
Fic. 10.—Mugil tricuspidens n. sp. (see note, fig. 3).
profile. No marked axillary scale in juveniles; a short, blunt, curved
scale in adults, movable only in fresh specimens. _
Ventrals 1-7-1-8 in head, inserted below midway between base of
pectoral and origin of first dorsal, edge of fin gently rounded
Axillary scale 3-1-3-5 in head. |
Caudal forked, upper lobe longer in adults, mid-rays 1:7-1-9 in head.
Scales ctenoid: mucus canal short, oblique. Predorsal scales
nearly as wide as long (Pl. XVIII, G and H), |r. 43-48, Ltr. 14-15.
Four cheek scales, 16-17-predorsal to above hind margin of head.
Colour.—Greenish above, silvery on sides and below. 7-8 very
distinct longitudinal dusky streaks corresponding with the scale rows,
visible in all but the very youngest stadia. Opercles golden or bronzy.
Localities.—Mossel Bay, Knysna River, Zwartkops River, Buffalo
River, Mazeppa Bay, Durban. |
Length.—Up to 550 mm.
Sixteen specimens, from 60 mm. in length up, examined.
Types, from Knysna, in the Albany Museum.
There is very little doubt that the specimens described by Smith
VOL. XXX, PART 9. 42
110
620 Annals of the South African Museum.
(loc. cit.), as capensis C. and V., belong to this species. The sole
diagnostic feature in the description is the scale-count, which is
valid also for capito or saliens. The figure, however, leaves no doubt
about the identity with tricuspidens.
It may be noted that in A. Smith’s pl. xxx, fig. 1 is below and fig. 2
above. Pappe (loc. cit.) had evidently not noticed this, for he has
obviously confused multilineatus with capensis.
Boulenger (loc. cit.), presumably having seen both the type of
capensis C. and V. and Smith’s specimen, stated that this latter is
not capensis C.and V. Giinther (loc. cit.) accepted Smith’s diagnosis,
but regarded the latter species as identical with euronotus Smith,
and stated that both are identical with saliens Risso.
The original description of capensis (C. and V., Hist. Nat. Poiss.,
vol. x1, p. 108) is so vague and brief that it is quite impossible even
to guess what species was actually described.
I am therefore provisionally naming this tricuspidens n. sp., and
must leave the final pronouncement of the validity of this step to
some worker who may be able to examine adequate material, in-
cluding the type of capensis C. and V.
As this species is normally estuarine, it is possible that it may
prove to be endemic.
It is well differentiated from our other species. by numerous features,
chiefly by the relatively large tricuspid teeth, while the characteristic
longitudinal stripes show up well even in preserved specimens.
It may be noted that net fishermen at Knysna constantly dis-
tinguish this species as the “Streepharder,” naming large specimens
(unfortunately in common with large specimens of all species)
“Springer.”
M. tricuspidens does not appear to be anywhere very numerous nor
specially gregarious, and, so far as I am aware, occurs only in tidal
estuaries. Juvenile specimens are seldom encountered, and since
the species is characterised by most extraordinary leaping powers,
large numbers are rarely taken by the nets. I have at night in a
boat frequently pursued adults of this species, which are exceedingly
difficult to capture. When startled, large adults will leap anything
up to 40 feet, rising 7 to 8 feet in the air, and the leap may be repeated
six or seven times. The species may be clearly distinguished at
night, when in the air, by means of a powerful light, the longitudinal
stripes showing up clearly against the light silvery body.
Specimens occasionally jump into a boat which carries a light ;
large adults weighing 53 lb. have been taken in this manner, and I
111
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 621
have known a man to be knocked from his seat by the impact of
one of these fishes on his chest.
At Knysna ripe females are encountered in the late autumn and
early spring. Specimens are usually encountered at night in shallow
water on mud-banks, and are exceedingly shy. I have occasionally
been able to approach specimens which have continued to circle over
the mud, clearly visible in the light of the lamp, but the least move-
ment of the light, or any noise in the boat, results in the characteristic
leap. On one occasion a dozen or more large specimens broke water
round the boat, and for some seconds the air appeared to be full .of
silvery bodies, and the plunging leaps produced a considerable volume
of sound.
Mugil sehelt Forsk.
(Plates XVI, C, and XVIII, C, D.)
1888. Day, Fish. India, p. 355.
1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, vol. iv, p. 91, fig. 53.
1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fish. Indo-Aust. Archip., vol. iv,
p. 252.
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 306.
Depth 3-8, length of head 3-8 in length of body. Eye 4-5, snout
4-2, interorbital width 2-4, and postorbital length 1-8 in length of
head. Adipose eyelids rudimentary. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter
apart, anterior nearer the profile of the tip of the snout than the
anterior margin of the eye. Lower margin of preorbital bent,
notched, and serrate; scaly. Maxilla completely concealed. Angle
of lower jaw 103°, outline of jaw angular. Upper lip thin, width at
apex of snout 4 in eye. Symphysial knob double. No teeth in
jaws visible. Vomer with traces of fine teeth, tongue with patches
of villiform teeth. Palatines edentate. Exposed area on chin very
short and narrow, would probably increase with age.
D IV+I, 8. First dorsal inserted 1-1 times as far from caudal base
as from the tip of the snout, 1-4 times as far from the tip of the
mid-caudal rays as from the tip of the snout. First spine 2-1, base
of first dorsal 2-9 in head. Distance from origin of first to origin of
second dorsal 1-05 in head. First dorsal inserted above the 13th,
second above the 26th lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends
behind origin of first dorsal 2-4 in head, 2-1 in distance from origin
of first to origin of second dorsal, and 4-2-5 in distance from origin
of first dorsal to tip of snout. Longest soft ray shorter than the
ventral fin and than the distance from hind margin of head to the
112
622 Annals of the South African Museum.
centre of the eye, 1:8; base of second dorsal 2-7 in head. Last ray
longer than penultimate, fin scarcely falcate anteriorly, edge moder-
ately concave. Soft dorsal scaly.
A III, 9. Inserted slightly in advance of second dorsal, below the
25th lateral scale. Longest ray 1-7 in head, shape of fin similar to
that of second dorsal; scaly.
P 18, 1-1 in head, tip reaches to the 13th lateral scale, fin inserted
3:3 times as far from the ventral as from the dorsal profile. Axillary
scale long and pointed, 3-2 in length of head. Most of fin scaled.
Ventrals 1-6 in head, longer than longest dorsal ray, inserted below
Fie. 11.—Mugil seheli Forsk. (see note, fig. 3).
midway between hind margin of head and origin of first dorsal or
slightly nearer the former. Edge of fin gently rounded. Axillary
scale 3in head. Fin almost completely scaly.
Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe longer, mid-rays 1-7 in head; scaly.
Scales more or less cycloid, traces of denticulations on exposed
area. Mucus canal long and narrow (Pl. XVIII, Cand D). Predorsal
scales as wide as long. Lat. ser. 39-41, ltr. 14, 3 cheek scales,
14 predorsally to above the hind margin of the head.
Colour.—Silvery, darker above. Axil of pectoral black.
Localhity.—Durban, Chilka Lake, Bay of Bengal.*
Length.—Up to 170 mm.
Three specimens, from 167 mm. in length up, examined.
Judging from the literature many authors are uncertain of the
diagnosis of seheli. The majority agree in a scale-count of 38-42
and in stating that the maxillary is hidden. Fowler (Proc. Ac. Nat.
Sei. Phil., 1925, vol. lxxvi, p. 209) describes as seheli two specimens
* A specimen kindly lent by the Director of the Indian Museum, Calcutta.
113
The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 623
from Delagoa Bay, and states that the scales are 33-35, but omits
to mention whether the maxillary is hidden or exposed. These
specimens can hardly be seheli; the description agrees closely with
that of strongylocephalus Guthr., and it is possible that Fowler may
have overlooked the adipose eyelids, although in the same paper he
describes a specimen of this latter species (as longimanus Gnthr.)
from the same locality. (But see note under canaliculatus.)
M. caeruleomaculatus Lac. is by many authors held to be a synonym
of seheli. I have, however, examined a specimen of the former species
from India,* and it is quite clearly distinct.
M. sehelt is not very abundant in our area, nor does it appear to
extend south of Natal. It is apparently widely distributed in the
Indo-Pacific.
Mugil buchanani Blkr.
(Plates XVI, D, and XX, C, D.)
1861. Ginther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. iii, p. 446 (ceylonensis).
1888. Day, Fish. India, p. 358.
1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, p. 93, fig. 55 (ceylonensis).
1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 305 (ceylonensis).
1928. Fowler, Fish. Oceania, p. 123.
Snout very broad and short, bluntly rounded anteriorly. Depth
3°3-3'7, length of head 3-3 (J.)-4-0 (Ad.) in length of body. Hye 3-2
(J.)-5 (Ad.), snout 3-5 (J.)—4-0 (Ad.), interorbital width 2-0-2-3 (J.),
and postorbital length 1-7-1-9 in length of head. Adipose eyelids
rudimentary, better visible in adults. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter
apart, anterior as far from profile of snout tip as posterior from
_ anterior margin of orbit. Lower margin of preorbital slightly bent,
not, or slightly, notched; end truncated, lower and hinder edge
serrated, scaly. End of maxilla completely concealed. Angle of
lower jaw 110-122°, outline of jaw almost angular. Symphysial
knob double. Upper lip thin, width at apex of snout 5ineye. Very
minute ciliiform teeth in a single series in each Jaw in very young
specimens, none visible in half-grown or adults. Vomer and palatines
edentate. Pre-vomerine groove distinct. Villiform teeth on ptery-
goids and round the anterior margin of the tongue. Space between
rami of mandibles on chin almost absent in juveniles, gradually
enlarges with age; long and wide in large adults.
D IV+I, 8. First dorsal inserted 0-90 (J.)-1:15 (Ad.) times as
* Kindly lent by the Director of the Indian Museum, Calcutta.
114
624 Annals of the South African Museum.
far from the caudal base as from tip of snout, 1-23 (J.)-1-43 times as
far from the hind margin of the mid-caudal rays as from the tip of
the snout. First spine 1-7-1-9, base of first dorsal 2-0-2-2 in head.
Distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal 1:0—1-2 (J.) in
head. First dorsal inserted above the 9th-12th, second above the
20th-23rd lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends behind the
origin of the first dorsal 2-6—2-9 (J.) in head, 2-4-2-6 in distance from
origin of first to origin of second dorsal and 5-0-6-6 in distance from
origin of first dorsal to tip of snout. Second soft ray longer than
ventrals, and than distance from hind margin of head to centre of
eye, 1:25-1-4 (J.); base of second dorsal 2-6-3 (J.)in head. Last ray
fem. —
Fig. 12.—Mugil buchanani Blkr. (see note, fig. 3).
longer than penultimate; in adults the fin is anteriorly elevated,
falcate, edge deeply concave. Second dorsal densely scaled.
A III, 9. Inserted opposite origin of second dorsal. Second ray
1-2-1-4 (J.) in head, last ray longer than penultimate; in adults the
fin is anteriorly elevated, falcate, edge deeply concave, densely scaled.
There is considerable alteration in the shape of the soft dorsal
and anal fins with growth. In very young specimens (< 100 mm.)
the anterior rays are fairly long, but the fin is not markedly falcate,
since the middle rays are relatively longer than in the adult, and the
edges of the fins are feebly concave. As the size of the fish increases,
the anterior rays become relatively longer and the middle rays
shorter, the fin assuming the anteriorly falcate shape when the
length of the fish is more than +120mm. The scaling of the fins also
increases from the very young to this size. In the former the basal
scaling only is plain, there being apparently a mere sprinkling of
light scales over the distal portions of the fins.
P 17-18, 1-0-1-15 (J.) in head, tip reaches 11th—12th lateral] scale,
115
Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 625
inserted 2-8-3-3 times as far from ventral as from dorsal profile. . NO .
ANY SNS
eh SS :
Se? >
Trext-Fic. 4.—Gobius callidus J. L. B. Smith.
Gobius giuris Ham. Buch.—Depth 4-5, head 3 in body
length. Eye 4-7 in head. Papillae in rows on cheeks.
Lower jaw projects strongly. Mouth extends below eye.
D. VI.+1, 9, soft rays in second dorsal not nearly as long
as head. A.I.8, soft rays similar to dorsal. Pectoral
shorter than head. Caudal shorter than or equal to head.
30-36 series of scales, ltr. 9-11. Scales on top of head.
Brown-olive, with or without blotches on sides. Pectoral,
dorsal, and caudal spotted or barred. L.R.S. 15 inches.
Equally at home in the sea or in fresh water. One of the
most widely distributed species. Occurs from about Knysna
eastwards along the coast to Madagascar, India, and China.
In all estuaries and lagoons and in many inland waters in
South Africa. This is the largest of the Gobies. It breeds
freely in captivity, and in India is kept in tanks and ponds,
and is eaten with relish by the natives. |
Gobius aeneofuscus Peters.—Depth 5-6, head 3-5 in body
length. Eye 4-7 in head. Mouth extends to below eye,
upper jaw extends beyond lower. D. VI.+1, 10; A.I. 10.
Caudal shorter than head. 58-64 series of scales; L.tr.
16-18. Head naked. Olive-brown above, bronzy on sides,
light below. Obscure mottlings on body. Two oblique lines
from eye to mouth. Soft dorsal and caudal spotted or
barred. L.R.S. 10 inches.
Fresh waters of the Eastern Cape, extending through
Natal, Transvaal to Rhodesia. Also in fresh waters of
Madagascar.
235
Family CLUPEIDAE. Herrings and relatives.
Genus GILCHRISTELLA Fowler.
Compressed, almost transparent body. Scales soft,
easily shed. Pectorals low down. Ventrals before dorsal.
A single short dorsal, anal short or long. Teeth minute or
absent. Adipose eyelids absent. A silvery lateral stripe.
Gilchristella aestuarius Glch.—Depth equal to head, 4 in
body length. Eye 3 in head. No adipose eyelids. Lower
jaw projects, mouth extends to eye. D. 14-16, inserted
nearer caudal base than snout tip. A. 18-21, originates
below end of dorsal. 40 series of scales; Ltr. 10. Caudal
forked. Silvery, back darker, brilliant silvery lateral stripe.
L.R.S. 3 inches.
This small Clupeid occurs in the sea, but is found mostly
in estuaries. It occurs also in landlocked brackish and fresh-
water lagoons. These fishes swim in large shoals, and are
preyed upon by numerous aquatic birds. The fishes in the
shoals have a curious habit of swimming with the head up
and the snout just out of the water. On the approach of
danger there is a silvery flash and the whole shoal dives a
few feet, to reappear a few moments later at the surface.
Sometimes known as “ Whitebait.”’
Family MONODACTYLIDAE. Small, deep-bodied, compressed
fishes of tropical and temperate waters, some of which are
equally at home in the sea and in fresh water. A single dorsal.
Bright silvery, with dark cross-lines on young.
Genus MONODACTYLUS.
Body deep, scaly. Mouth small, protractile. Colour
silvery. One species extends from the Cape eastwards,
found in the sea and in fresh waters of the Kastern Cape
and beyond.
Monodactylus falciformis Lacep. ‘‘ Moony,” ‘“ Cape
Lady.” [Pl. 34, Fig. 1.*]}—Body ovate, deeper in the adult,
depth 1-5-2, head 3 in body length. Eye 2in head. D. VIII.
27-30. A. III. 27-30. Front rays of soft dorsal and anal
elevated. Ventrals very small. 1.1. scales 50-60. Bright
silvery. Lobes of soft dorsal and anal dusky. Young with
numerous narrow dark cross-bars. L.R.S. 10 inches.
236
Fresh waters of the Eastern Cape, even near Grahams-
town. Often caught by “Springer” anglers. The flesh is
rather insipid and deteriorates rapidly.
Family GALAXIIDAE. Small fishes of the Southern
Hemisphere, fairly closely related to the Salmonidae (of the
Northern Hemisphere).
Some species live and reproduce in fresh water, others
are catadromous, 7.e. return to the sea to spawn, the reverse
of some of the Salmonidae, which ascend rivers to spawn
(anadromous).
Genus GALAXIAS Cuvier.
Body elongate. A single short dorsal fin. Mouth
moderate, with small teeth.
Only one species from the South-eastern Cape.
Galaxias zebratus Cast. [Pl]. 34, Fig. 3.*]|—Depth 5-6-5,
head 3-5-4 in body length. Eye 4 in head. Mouth extends
to below eye. Teeth of more or less even length. Lower
jaw projects slightly. D. III-IV. 7-8, base shorter than head
length. A. III-IV. 7-8. Spines in both fins feeble. Caudal
slightly rounded. No lateral line. Grey-brown, mottled to
form irregular cross-bars. L.R.S. 24 inches.
Inhabitants of clear fresh waters, plentiful in the Cape
midlands, scarce farther east.
Family SALMONIDAE. ‘“ Salmon,’ ‘‘ Trout.’’ One species
of these carnivorous fishes from the Northern Hemisphere
has long been established in certain parts of South Africa.
The fishes thrive in the clear waters of the Western Cape, and
in the mountain streams of the Eastern Cape and Natal.
The somewhat impermanent turbid waters of the South-
eastern Cape do not suit them as well, and even in large
permanent reservoirs they have not been as successful as was
anticipated.
T'wo sub-species Salmo fario fario Linn, the Brown Trout,
and Salmo fario irideus Gibbons, the Rainbow Trout, have
been firmly established.
Genus SALMO Linn.
Body elongate. Two dorsal fins, the posterior adipose.
Mouth large, teeth conical. Body with a heavy coating of
mucus. |
237
Two sub-species in South Africa.
A. Caudal truncated. Dark spots on body. fario fario.
B. Caudal slightly emarginate. A longitudinal purplish stripe. fario irideus.
Family CENTRARCHIDAE. The large-mouth Black Bass,
Micropterus salmoides Lacep., is a recent importation. It has
been introduced into waters in numerous parts of South
Africa and, where records are available, appears everywhere
to flourish.
Micropterus salmoides Linn. ‘‘ Black Bass.’? Depth
about 3 in body length. Mouth large, extending below eye.
Spinous dorsal short, almost separate from soft fin, 3rd and
4th spines longest, hinder spines shorter. Soft dorsal and
anal rounded, not elevated anteriorly, of 11-12 rays. Caudal
rounded truncate. Superficially resembles the ‘“‘ Kurper,”’
but has a deeper body, only one lateral line, and a shorter
spinous dorsal. |
Reported to attain a weight of 20 lb. (America) ; average
weight 3-4 lb. Already firmly established in several parts
in the South-eastern Cape. This species spawns fairly
young, probably from the age of 2 or 3 years, and the eggs
and fry are guarded by the male parent.
The Black Bass is an active predaceous fish, which
appears to take almost any bait or artificial lure. It has
been found that while the Trout may almost be prevented
from multiplying by the voracious Kurper (Anabas capensis),
that latter species may actually be exterminated by the more
voracious Black Bass.
PLATE XXIX.
a
Sau
_
(From ** Catalogue Fresh-Water Fishes of Africa,’ British Museum.)
(1) Barbus trevelyani Gnthr. (p. 123); (2) Barbus anoplus Weber
(p. 124) “ Red-fin” ; (3) Barbus gilchristi Blgr. (p. 126); (4) Barbus
hemipleurogramma Blegr. (p. 127).
PLATE XXX.
From “‘ Catalogue Fresh-Water Fishes of -\frica,” British Museum.)
Barbus capensis Smith (p. 125) “ Silver-fish ”’ ; Barbus
burchelli Smith (p. 127); Barbus brookingi Glch. (p. 125);
Barbus paludinosus Peters (p. 125) ‘‘ Gilliminkie.”
PuateE XXNI,
(From ‘ Catalogue Fresh-W ater Fishes of Africa,” British Museum.)
(1) Barbus holubi Stndnr. (p. 126) ‘‘ Yellow-fish”’; (2) Barbus
vulneratus Cast. (p. 127); (3) Labeo capensis Smith (p. 128);
(4) Labeo umbratus Smith (p. 129).
SS Sa ahah f Sane
Nun ania 3 ‘ : Reon
sia
at :
Haat
ae
ee
une ana
:
(From “ Catalogue Fresh-Water Fishe
1) Tilapia natalensis Weber (p. 133) ‘‘ Mud-fish”’; (2) Tilapia
sparrmani Smith (p. 133); (3) Haplochromis moffati Cast. (p. 134).
of Africa,’ British Musenm.)
Pirate XXXII.
ee
[CS om
Paes oo : i a
|. _. :
.
:
a
A
,
: _
ee
Ra e
an
|
i a i
me
(From ‘ Catalogue Fresh-Water Fishes of Africa,” British Museum.)
— (1) Gephyroglanis sclateri Blgr. (p. 130) ‘‘ Barbel”’; (2) Anabas
bainsii Cast. (p. 135); (3) Anabas capensis C. & V. (p. 134) ‘‘ Kurper.”
Prats XXXIV.
(From ‘Catalogue Fresh-Water Fishes of Africa,’ British Museum.)
(1) Monodactylus falciformis Lacep. (p. 139) “ Moony”; (2)
Plotosus anguillaris Blch. (p. 130) ‘‘ Barbel-eel”’; (3) Galaxias
zebratus Cast. (p. 140).
238.
Records of the Albany Museum. Vol. IV. Part II. pp. 358-364.
Pls. XL—XLII. May, 1935.
The South African Species of the Family Aluteridae.
By J. L. B. SMITH.
[With Plates XL—XLII.]
The highly specialised Division Sclerodermi has been
critically examined by comparatively few workers. The most
comprehensive investigation appears to be that of Regan (Proc.
Zool. Soc. Lond. 1902, vol. II, p. 284 ff.). Other works, to which
I have access, deal only with regional fauna. The relationships
of the various groups do not appear to be well understood, and
the Division seems badly in need of revision.
Regan’s classification of the groups was based chiefly upon
internal features, but evidently he did not examine sufficient
material to ensure that his generalisations were applicable to
all the genera. At the same time, he stated that any attempt
at further subdivision of the family Balistidae into new families
would probably necessitate the raising of practically every genus
then recognised to family rank.
In recent work on these fishes, in addition to the Balistidae,
the family Monacanthidae has been generally recognised.
A graduated series of stadia of Aluteres monoceros Osb.
has recently been obtained from South African waters, and work
on this has led to a critical examination of the genus Aluteres
Cuv. This has hitherto been accepted as falling in the Mona-
canthidae (or by many, Monacanthinae). While Aluteres has
most probably originated from the Monacanthidae, the juveniles
showing many typically Monacanthid features, there are never-
theless sufficient grounds to justify the separation of Aluteres
from the Monacanthidae, with at least sub-family rank, at least
as far as South African material is concerned.
Mr. Fraser-Brunner, at the British Museum, who has under-
taken the much-needed revision of the whole order Plectognathi,
has informed me that my conclusions are in line with those to
which he had independently come, and has urged the publication
of the results embodied in the present work. It is now suggested
that Aluteres be raised to full family rank, the Aluteridae.
239
South African Fish.—Smith. 359
FAMILY ALUTERIDAE.
Supraclavicle vertical. Precaudal vertebrae with moderate
parapophyses, without epipleurals. No epipleurals to caudal
vertebrae. Prezygapophyses of the much-reduced first vertebra
ankylosed with the occipital condyles. Dentary fused with
articular. Premaxillae not protractile, united with maxillae.
Palatines free from ectopterygoid. Preorbital ossified. Ethmoid
region very elongate, without nasal cavities. Spinous dorsal of
two spines, probably of secondary origin, the first weak, with
posterior basal dilation: the second rudimentary, with anterior
basal dilation, which can lock the first in the erect position. Soft
dorsal and anal long and low. A large oblique ossified sub-
cutaneous process in advance of the basipterygials of the soft
dorsal. (Pl. XLI, b.) Pelvis represented by a single long bone,
attached to the pectoral arch, more or less movable. Ventrals
rudimentary, immovable, probably dermal in origin, present in
juveniles as a minute stellate spine, inserted below about the
middle of the pelvis: become reduced or obsolete in large adults.
Compressed incisor-like teeth in both jaws. The air-bladder has
on each side a sub-conical posterior process, which penetrates
some distance into the caudal region.
Vertebrae 22 (7 +15): the haemal process of the first caudal
vertebra much elongated, reaching to near the ventral margin,
apically dilated.
The entire absence of any trace of epipleurals, the presence
of the ventral spine, and the nature of the air-bladder, do not
appear to have been previously noticed, while it has hitherto been
accepted that the number of vertebrae is 21.
The large ossified process immediately anterior to the
basipterygials of the soft dorsal, which is present also in those
species of the Balistidae and of the Monacanthidae which I have
seen, is possibly the coalesced basipterygials and fin spines of an
obsolete spinous dorsal. |
It is noteworthy that the bases of the fin-rays of the soft
dorsal and anal fins do not articulate with the apical dilations
of the basipterygials, but are widely separated from these, by a
240
360 South African Fish.—Smith.
cartilaginous rod, for the entire length of each fin (Pl. 2, a).
This rod is elliptical in cross-section, and has on each side,
opposite each fin-ray, a groove, in which lies the muscle con-
necting the rays with the basipterygials. Part of the anterior
end of the dorsal rod fits into a supero-posterior excavation in
the ossified predorsal process described above.
The entire absence at all stadia of epipleurals,* the obsoles-
cent ventral spine, and the peculiar structure of the hydrostatic
organ, none of which is characteristic of the Balistidae or of
the Monacanthidae, would appear to justify the separation of
Aluteres from these families.
It is possible that some of the relatéd genera, such as
Pseudaluteres, may also be found to fall in the Aluteridae, but I
have no material to determine this point.
It is noteworthy that juveniles of this family show Several
typical Monacanthid external features, which are partly or wholly
lost or changed with growth.
Genus Aluteres Cuv.
1902. Regan, loc. cit. p. 290.
1908. Jordan and Fowler, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus.,.vol. 25,
p. 274 and p. 275 (Osbeckia).
1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., voi. X XI, p. 960.
With the characters of the family.
Gill-rakers normal, small, lanceolate, fairly widely spaced.
The skin is covered with minute close-set cilia (Pl. 3, E), so as
to be soft and velvety to the touch.
Caudal rounded or truncate (adults).
The only two South African species, monoceros Osbeck and
scriptus Osbeck, appear to be quite clearly congeneric. Jordan
and Evermann (Check-List Fishes, 1896, p. 424, fide Barnard
loc. cit.) proposed the genus Osbeckia for species with concave
snout profile and caudal longer than head. These slender dis-
tinctions, especially in view of the evidence here adduced, are
inadmissible as of generic significance.
*It may be remarked that in one case a single presumed epipleural
to the 5th precaudal vertebra was found on one side only.
241
South African Fish.—Smith. 361
In so far as can be determined, both species are valid. They
are so closely related, especially in the juvenile. stadia, that the
possibility of sexual dimorphism might be suspected. I have no
sexually mature adults of either species, but in so far as I have
been able to determine, among the adults of monoceros which I
have examined are males and females, so that both species may
be accepted.
Numerous nominal species of Aluteres have been described,
but many of these are obviously merely different growth stadia.
In the case of monoceros at least, there is very considerable
change in general features with growth, as will be described
below. In the case of scriptus, these cannot be described, since I
have seen only one specimen, but there is reason for presuming
that at least similar growth changes occur in this species (vide
infra).
KEY TO THE SOUTH AFRICAN SPECIES.
I. Caudal not longer than head; rounded or
truncate (adult) = .. . ; .. monoceros.
II. Caudal longer than head, rounded . .. seriptus.
Aluteres monoceros Osb. (Pls. XL—XLIL)
? *Cantor, Cat. Mal. Fish, p. 353 (obliteratus).
1888. Day, Fishes of India, p. 698. Pl. CLXXIX, fig. 2
(synonymy). |
1903. Jordan and Fowler, loc. cit., p. 274.
1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 960.
1928. Fowler, Fishes Oceania, p. 461.
This species has so often been described that repetition of
the obvious features is unnecessary. The more unusual features
and the growth changes are described below. |
The following table indicates the change with growth of
certain of the dimensional relationships.
Length, mm. a .. 68. 95. 123. 135. 300. 595.
Depth in length of body 2.4 24 24 26 29 3.
Eye in head.. a .. 40 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.5.
Caudalinhead .. .. — 18 14 17 2.0 2.6
* I have received a copy of this description from Mr. Norman, of the
British Museum,
242
362 _ South African Fish.—Smith.
The chief growth changes are the following :—
Shape of body: In the very young the body is fairly deep,
with the greatest depth across the shoulder. The breast is
strongly convex. The body tapers more or less uniformly from
the head to the caudal. With growth, the convexity of the breast
becomes less, till in old adults there is a marked angle below the
chin at the breast. The cuneate shape is modified in that the
body becomes deeper posteriorly, until it is about of even depth
from the first to the second dorsal. (Pl. XL, A-D.)
Dorsal spine: In the young the first spine is relatively more
elongate, and has four series of fairly large barbs (Pl. XLII, C).
With growth the spine becomes relatively shorter, more slender,
and the barbs degenerate into granulations. This spine is
frequently deformed.
Caudal fin: In the young the fin is relatively more elongate
and strongly rounded. With growth, the fin becomes shorter, and
the hind margin less convex, until finally the truncate fin of the
adult results.
Ventral spine: In the very young the ventral spine is fairly
prominent, stellate (Pl. XLII, D). With growth, the apical pro-
jections diminish, until in adults the whole is reduced to a
minute more or less translucent knob, which can nearly always
be located by loosening the skin of the hinder third of the pelvis
and viewing against a light. In the very smallest specimens there
appear to be signs of some connection between the base of the
spine and the pelvis, but in all the other stadia, it is unquestion-
ably dermal. The significance of the dermal origin of the spine
was pointed out to me by Mr. Fraser-Brunner, who is dealing
fully with the matter.
Profile of snout: In the young the dorsal profile of the snout
is fairly concave. With growth, the concavity lessens, until in
large adults the profile is convex.
Gill-rakers 22-25 on the lower part of the anterior arch,
about 6 in gill-filaments, which are rather longer than the eye.
The dorsal originates opposite or behind the anal.
This species occurs on our coasts from the Cape eastwards.
I have seen specimens from the Cape; Mossel Bay; Knysna:
243
South African Fish.—Smith. 363
Port Alfred: Great Fish Point; East London; Durban, and
Delagoa Bay.
Aluteres scriptus Osb. (Pl. XLII, A.)
1888. Day, loc. cit., p. 694. Pl. CLXXX, fig. 3.
1908. Jordan and Fowler, loc. cit., p. 276 (Osbeckia
scriptus) .
1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 961.
1928. Fowler, loc. cit., p. 461. Pl. XLVII, B.
I have seen only one specimen of this species, 113 mm. in
length, from Durban. From this, and from figures, it would
appear that growth changes occur also in this species.
In the juveniles, the maximum depth is through the breast,
which is strongly convex. This convexity apparently diminishes
with growth, although the body does not appear to lose the
uniform tapering from the first dorsal to the caudal.
The caudal apparently always remains rounded and longer
than the head (1.2 times head), and the dorsal profile of the
snout is always concave.
At equivalent stadia, the body is always less deep than that
of monoceros. | |
The ventral spine resembles that of monoceros. The dorsal
spine in my specimen (Pl. XLII, B) shows minute barbs set
among granulations. In my specimen, the dorsal originates in
advance of the anal.
Gill-rakers 28 on the lower part of the anterior arch, about
4 in gill-filaments, which are equal to the eye.
This species is very seldom encountered on our shores.
I wish to express my gratitude to the Carnegie Research
Fund (through the Research Grant Board of South Africa) for
financial assistance, which has defrayed a great part of the costs
incurred in the investigation. Also to Dr. J. A. Wain of Cathcart,
for numerous radiographs. |
Plate XL.
Four stadia of Aluteres monoceros Osb. The small arrow
indicates the position of the ventral spine,
244
364 South African Fish.—Smith.
Plate XLI.
Aluteres monoceros Osb. Radiograph.
a. Cartilaginous rod between fin-rays and basipterygials.
b. Predorsal process.
Plate XLII.
A. Aluteres scriptus Osb. The arrow indicates the position of
the ventral spine.
B. First dorsal of same; enlarged.
b. second spine.
C. First dorsal of a juvenile Aluteres monoceros Osb.
a. second spine.
D. Ventral spine of same specimen (135 mm. in length). Pos-
terior margin to the right.
E. Portion of skin of the same specimen, showing cilia,
Rec. Alb. Mus., Vol. IV. Plate XL
Aluteres monoceros Osb.
(The small arrow indicates the ventral spine.)
Rec. Alb. Mus., Vol. IV. | Plate XLI.
lem,
teas |
Aluteres monoceros Osb.
a. Cartilaginous rod below dorsal and anal.
b. Ossified predorsal process.
Rec. Alb. Mus., Vol. IV. Plate XLII.
D ,__
A. Aluteres scriptus Osb. B.. Dorsal spine of same.
C. Aluteres monoceros Osb. Dorsal spine. D. Ventral spine. EK. Portion of skin.
245.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXIII.
Part IV. pp. 303—310. Pls. XXI—XXII|. February, 1936.
THE GENUS TRIPTERODON PLAYFAIR.
By J. L. B. Smira.
(With Plates XXI-X XIII and one Text-figure.)
(Read June 19, 1935.)
The genus Tripterodon Plyfr. with the single African species orbis Plyfr.
has hitherto not received more than brief attention, and the features
which would indicate its taxonomic relationships do not appear to have
been investigated in any detail.
A careful examination of the skeletal and structural features of this
genus has led to a comparison with the same features in the obviously
related genera Platax Cuv. and Drepane Cuv.; with these is allied
Evhippus Cuv. It has not been possible to obtain a specimen of the latter
for dissection, but it is obvious from accounts dealing with the internal
structure, as well as from the external features in a specimen examined,
that this genus and the three others mentioned form a natural group.
Although Platax, Ephippus, and Drepane are among the earliest de-
scribed genera of fishes, there is some diversity of opinion among sys-
tematists as to their taxonomic relationships. Regan (Ann. Mag. Nat.
Hist., 1913 (8), vol. xii, p. 127), who based his opinions chiefly upon skeletal
features, placed Platax with Ephippus in the Ephippidae, and separated
Drepane as the type of the family Drepanidae; in this latter case he has
not given any detailed reasons for his conclusion beyond that Drepane
has no subocular shelf, while stating that in all other skeletal features the
two families are identical. Plataz, with a feeble subocular shelf, in this
respect falls midway between Drepane and Ephippus, the latter having
a strong shelf.
Barnard (Ann. S.A. Mus., 1927, vol. xxi, pp. 600 and 605) followed
Regan’s classification.
Fowler (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1925, vol. Ixxvu, p. 251) at first
accepted Regan’s classification for Drepane, but has more recently (Bull.
U.S. Nat. Mus., 1929, vol. viii, p. 25; and Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1934,
vol. lxxxvi, p. 479) accorded Drepane only sub-family rank in the Ephippidae,
while separating Plataz as a monotypic family. In the absence of more
precise reasons, based on skeletal data, for the recognition of the Drepanidae
246
304 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
by Regan, Fowler’s later classification, although obviously based on external
features only, might appear almost justifiable.
The genus Tripterodon Plyfr. has been somewhat arbitrarily placed in
various families. Fowler (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1925, vol. lxxvu,
p. 242; and Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1933, vol. xii, p. 202) placed Tripterodon
in the Girellidae, whereas more recently (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1934,
vol. Ixxxvi, p. 478) he has described the single species of that genus as a
Chaetodipterus Lac., placed with Drepane in the Ephippidae, and has thus
indirectly recognised that Tripterodon is closely related to Ephippus and
to Drepane. Barnard (loc. cit., p. 725) placed Tripterodon in the Sparidae,
and also confused Tripterodon with Chaetodipterus (loc. cut., pp. 603, 604)
by accepting what have proved to be somewhat excusable malidentifica-
tions by earlier workers on South African fishes.
Examination has shown that the inclusion of T7'r:pterodon in the Girellidae
has little to recommend it. Fowler has probably regarded the dentition
as a feature of paramount significance, but there is little else in common
and so much divergence in important features that this diagnosis cannot
be accepted.
In the majority of skeletal features which systematists have hitherto
regarded as of chief significance, the four genera Plataw, Ephippus, Triptero-
don, and Drepane are so closely allied that they might easily be regarded
as all falling within one family. Nevertheless Drepane is distinguished
by several features, notably the structure of the upper jaw, which, although
apparently not regarded as important by earlier workers, would appear
to justify separation from the remaining three genera by full family rank.
According to the degree of taxonomic significance assigned to these special
characteristics of Drepane it is not even unlikely that the Drepanidae
may ultimately be raised to the rank of a division, with probable inclusion
of the Chaetodontidae.
With regard to the classification of the remaining three genera there
are several alternatives, but the selection of any one of these will very
largely depend upon the personal interpretation of the taxonomic signi-
ficance of the relatively few features in which these genera differ one from
the other. They may be regarded as each forming the type of a separate
family, although the separation of Platax from the remaining two, as
proposed by Fowler (loc. cit.), merely upon the somewhat abnormal external
features of that genus, does not appear to be justified, and is not accepted
here. Should, however, this distinction for Platax otherwise meet with
general approval, T'ripterodon would then appear to have at least equal
claims to recognition as the type of a separate family. It may here be in-
dicated that Fowler’s key to the genera of the Ephippidae (Bull. U.S. Nat.
Mus., 1929, vol. vill, p. 24) does not agree with his diagnosis of the family.
247
The Genus Tripterodon Playfair. 305
The strong subocular shelf and the setiform dentition are distinctive
characters which might reasonably be regarded as justifying full family
rank for E'phippus as opposed to the closely related Platax and Tripterodon.
Nevertheless, when all the available evidence is carefully weighed, it
appears to be more in keeping with generally accepted limits to adopt
the classification here proposed, i.e. in view of the general agreement in
the majority of important features, the genera Plataz, Ephippus, and
Tripterodon be placed in a single family, the Platacidae.* The special
features of Ephippus are then assigned only sub-family rank, while Platax
and Tripterodon are placed together in the sub-family Platacinae, as
arranged below in the key to the genera of the family Platacidase.
The following summary indicates the main features in which the
Drepanidae may be regarded as well distinguished from the Plataeidae.
I. Anterior maxillary processes produced, meeting beneath the anterior
margin of the mesethmoid, over the premaxillary pedicels. Pre-
maxillaries slender, highly expanded distally above and below.
Premaxillary pedicels very long, oblique, entering the skull
beneath the olfactory sacs, sliding in a deep excavation extending
between the lower orbital margins. Posterior ribs extensively
articulated with the parapophyses. Gill-membranes narrowly
fused with isthmus. Pectorals much longer than head. Scales
cycloid. (Caudal more or less rounded) . . . Drepanidae.
II. Maxillaries normal, not meeting anteriorly over the premaxillary
pedicels. Premaxillaries not or scarcely expanded distally: Pre-
maxillary pedicels not penetrating the skull, entirely anterior to
the orbital margins, sub-vertical. Posterior ribs not or scarcely
articulated with the parapophyses. Gill-membranes broadly
fused with isthmus. Pectorals shorter than head. Scales ctenoid.
(Caudal truncate or nearly so) . . . . . . . Platacidae.
In most other respects the families agree.
The curious shape and disposition of the premaxillaries of the
Drepanidae reveal the connection between that family and the Chaeto-
dontidae. In the latter, although the premaxillary pedicels are fairly
short, they are very oblique, and penetrate below the olfactory sacs. fn
Chaetodon setifer Blch. there does not appear to be the extensive articula-
tion of the ribs with the parapophyses indicated by Regan (loc. cit.) as
characteristic of the family.
It has earlier been indicated (Smith, Proc. Roy. Soc. 8.A., 1935,
vol. xxiii, p. 267) that the genus Dichistius Gill. reveals affinities with the
Platacidae, and connects that family with the natural group of the Scor-
pididae and the Kyphosidae.
* Platax (Cuv. Reg. Anim., 1817, vol. ii, p. 334) has page preference over Ephippus
(ibid., p. 335), and should therefore determine the name of the family.
248
306 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Famity PLATACIDAE.
Body compressed, elevated or ovate. Front profile steep. Mouth terminal, small,
moderately or scarcely protractile, more or less horizontal. Maxillary moderate, without
anterior forward expansion. Premaxillary pedicels fairly long. Jaws with bands of
movable teeth, slender and setiform, or compressed and notched. Palate edentate,
vomer sometimes feebly dentate. Preopercle not, finely, or coarsely, serrate (spinate in
young?). Gill-membranes united, broadly fused with isthmus, openings lateral. Gill-
rakers short, few. Branchiostegals 6 (or 7?).
Dorsal long, of a few spines, soft dorsal longer than spinous. Soft fin scaly. Below
the skin a stout antrorse procumbent spine, fused with the basipterygial of the first
two exposed spines; anterior to this, three obsolescent antrorse spines, the anterior
(inferior) overlapping the supraoccipital apex (Pl. XXII).
Anal of three spines, with small antrorse recumbent spine on anterior basipterygial;
soft fin scaly. Pectorals short. Ventrals fairly or very long, with axillary process.
Caudal of 17 principal rays, of more or less truncated form. Scales ctenoid, small or
moderate. Lateral line gently curved.
Vertebrae 24 (10+ 14), with parapophyses from the 4th. Anterior ribs expanded
proximally. An elevated occipital crest, anterior margin expanded. No parietal crests.
Subocular shelf feeble or strong. Air-bladder posteriorly bifurcated into two caudal
prolongations (Pl. XXIII).
The three genera here mentioned occur in the Indo-Pacific.
Key to the Genera.
I. Ephippinae.—Subocular _ shelf Strong. Teeth setiform. (Scales
fairly large) . ; ; ; . . Ephippus.
II. Platacinae. —Subocular shelf very feeble. Teeth compressed, tri-
cuspid. (Scales moderate or small.)
A. Dorsal spines graduated, none longer than longest soft rays.
More than 50 series of scales. Preorbital not very deep.
Premaxillary pedicels shorter than rami ; . Plataz.
B. 3rd-5th dorsal spines elongate, longest longer than posterior
spines and than longest soft rays. Less than 50 series of
scales. Preorbital very deep. Premaxillary pedicels as long
as rami . . . . . . . . . . Lripterodon.
Genus Epruiprus Cuv.
I have seen only a single specimen of the species orbis Bloch, from India.
This has not yet been found in the South African region, but will probably
be discovered there with more intensive collecting. It occurs in the Indian
region, but appears to be nowhere very plentiful.
In external form, chiefly in the shape of the fins, this species resembles
Tripterodon orbis Plytr. closely, but has a shallower preorbital and the
body is more uniformly orbicular, while the setiform teeth are immediately
diagnostic. As is shown below, the species goreensis C. and V. from the
West Coast of Africa shows even more remarkable resemblance to TJ. orbis
in external form.
249
Lhe Genus Tripterodon Playfair. 307
Genus Puatax Cuv.
Premaxillary pedicels short, almost vertical. Supraoccipital and anterior dorsal
basipterygial becoming greatly enlarged with age. Preopercle margin entire in adult.
Sometimes a few fine teeth on vomer. Teeth rather slender, but apically somewhat
dilated and sharply tricuspid.
On casual examination the teeth appear setiform. The dentition in
this genus is intermediate in form between that of Ephippus and that of
Tripterodon.
Fowler (Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1929, vol. viii, p. 17) has stated that
the air-bladder is simple. In those specimens I have examined the air-
bladder has a median longitudinal septum, and is bifurcated into two
caudal extensions, which are more pronounced in large specimens.
There appear to be fairly extensive growth changes and many nominal
species have been proposed, but the majority of recent workers appear
to accept only two, pinnatus Linn. (tera Cuv.=) and orbicularis Bloch
(vespertilio Cuv.=). Diagnoses of these species do not always agree, and
there appears to be some confusion with regard to the features upon which
differentiation is based.
As far as South African material is concerned, positive identification
with either species, 2.¢e. if both are recognised, is difficult.
It would appear not unlikely that there is but a single rather poly-
morphous species, though I have not sufficient material to enable me to
decide this.
Genus TRIPTERODON Plyfr.
1866. Playfair, Fishes of Zanzibar, p. 42.
1927. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 725.
1933. Fowler, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. xii, p. 202.
Premaxillary pedicels as long as rami, but not reaching frontals, almost vertical;
superior lateral processes very small. Maxillaries normal, short and deep, moderately
expanded distally. Subocular shelf extremely feeble, merely a slight pointed downward
expansion of the second suborbital. |
Vertebrae 24 (10 +14), first very much reduced, not ankylosed with the skull. Para-
pophyses from the fourth precaudal. Ribs all sessile. Epipleurals extremely fine, hair-
like. Haemal spines of anterior caudal vertebrae with median longitudinal expansion
below the extensions of the air-bladder (Pls. XXII and XXIII). Post-temporal forked,
not ankylosed. Post-clavicle long and slender. Pectoral radials 5, upper three bobbin-
shaped, only the lowest (5th) abutting on the coracoid (fig. 1).
Branchiostegals 6. Pseudobranchiae absent (concealed). Teeth very compressed,
slightly recurved, tricuspid. Pyloric caeca few (3-4).
Other characters as outlined for the family.
At present only a single species, orbis Plyfr., is known from the east
coast of Africa.
250
308 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Tripterodon orbis Plyfr.
(Pls. XXI-XXIIT)
Tripterodon orbis Plyfr., Playfair, loc. cit., p. 42, pl. vii, fig. 1. Fowler, Proc. Ac.
Nat. Sci. Phil., 1925, vol. xxvii, p. 242; and 1933, loc. cit., p. 202. Smith, Rec. Albany
Mus., 1935, vol. iv, p. 209.* .
Chaetodipterus orbis (non Bloch), Norman, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1922 (9), vol. ix, p. 321
(record only, error in Brit. Mus. Register).t
TExtT-ria. 1.—Left pectoral girdle of T'ripterodon orbis Plyfr. showing orientation of
ventral basipterygium.
Cl., cleithrum; Co., coracoid; Pc., post-clavicle; Pf., pectoral fin; Pt., post-temporal;
h., radial; Sc., scapula; Scl., supracleithrum; Vb., ventral basipterygium.
Chaetodtpterue goreensis (non C. and V.), Barnard, loc. cit., p. 603. Fowler, Proc. Ac.
Nat. Sci. Phil., 1934, vol. lxxxvi, p. 478, fig. 43.
Body more or less orbicular, more angular in adults, fairly compressed. Dorsal
profile very elevated, slightly undulate, with moderate interorbital prominence, which
increases with age.
Depth 1-2-1-4, length of head 3-0-3-2 in length of body. Eye 2-7-3-7 (Ad.), snout 1-6
(Ad)-1-8, interorbital 2-7-3-2 and postorbital 3-5-4-0 in length of head. Least depth of
preorbital 1-0 (Juv.)—1-4 times eye.
Nostrils wide apart, anterior rounded, posterior long and oval. Mouth horizontal,
small, terminal, only slightly protractile. Maxilla extends to below anterior nostril.
* In this paper Chaetodipterus orbis Bloch, recorded by Barnard, loc. cit., p. 604,
has erroneously been included in the synonymy of 7’. orbis; actually this author had merely
accepted the British Museum record.
{ Private communication from Mr. J. R. Norman.
251
The Genus Tripterodon Playfair. 309
Lips thick, especially upper, which is } eye deep at snout tip. All the teeth movable
compressed tricuspid incisiform, in about 4 rows, the outer of 18-20 teeth in each jaw:
the inner teeth embedded in fleshy pads.
Palate and tongue edentate. Gill-membranes broadly fused with isthmus. Gill-
rakers 9-10, short, about 4-5 in gill-filaments, which are 14-14 in eye. Preopercle serra-
tions more marked in juveniles.
D IX, 19-21, originates above hind margin of opercle. First spine very short ; second
twice the first; third 1-5-2-2 (Juv.); fourth 1-3-2-0 (Juv.); fifth 1-0-1-2 times head ;
remainder short, about equal to eye. Soft rays abruptly longer than last spine, 6th—8th
longest, 1:1-1-4 in head. Scaling on soft fin very dense at base. Base of spinous dorsal
about as long as head, of soft dorsal 1-4—1-5 times head.
A III, 16-17, spines fairly short and stout, second longest. Anterior rays longest,
1-2-1-4 in head, edge of fin almost straight.
Pectorals rounded, 1-2~-1-6 (Ad.) in head.
Ventrals 1-0-1-6 (Juv.) times head, first ray filamentous.
Caudal with hind margin gently undulate, with median convexity. Least depth of
peduncle about 2-6 in head. .
Scales ctenoid (Pl. XXIII), lateral line scales smaller than adjoining scales but not
12-13
hidden (Pl. XXIII), 1.1. 43-45, Ltr.
23-24
cheek, not much smaller than opercular scales.
Colour: Silvery brown, with dark cross-bars of varying width, first from nape through
eye to chest, second from before dorsal origin, thereafter 3 pairs alternately narrow and
wide, and ninth bar indistinct on peduncle. Bars generally narrower than interspace.
Snout dark. Spinous dorsal, ventral, and anterior portion of soft dorsal and anal, black.
Pectorals light, dark base. Soft dorsaland anal and caudal with obscure series of dark spots.
(origin of first dorsal spine back), 7 series on
Length.—Up to 300 mm. (Playfair).
Locality.—Durban, Delagoa Bay, Zanzibar.
Seven specimens, from 97-215 mm. in length, examined.
A very characteristic species, easily recognised by the shape of the body
and fins, by the restricted gill-openings, and by the apically brown, strongly
tricuspid teeth.
It is not remarkable that this species has been confused with Chaeto-
dipterus goreensis C. and V. (Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss.,
1831, vol. vii, p. 125, pl. 178), for in general external features the two
species resemble one another so closely that only detailed comparison could
show the difference between them.
In so far as may be judged from the description of the type of goreensis
(an adult) the sole external difference of any significance between that
species and Tripterodon orbis is in the dentition, the former having typical
brush-like setiform teeth. Besides this the preorbital in goreensis does not
appear to be as deep as in orbis, while C. and V.’s figure shows the cheek
scales to be very much smaller than those on the opercle, which is not the
case in orbis, the 3rd and 5th dorsal spines not filamentous, and the upper
lip not as deep as it is in orbis.
VOL. XXIII, PART IV. 22
252
310 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
A later description of goreensis by Pellegrin (Ann. Inst. Ocean., 1914, vol.
vi, p. 55, figs. 7 and 8) does not mention the dentition, shows the preorbital
to be deeper, and the 3rd—5th dorsal spines to be short in the juvenile and
elongate and filamentous in the adult stage, which latter growth change
appears rather exceptional.
So similar are goreensis and orbis that, had Cuvier not made the positive
statement about the setiform dentition of the former, I should have had
little hesitation in regarding the two as conspecific, for the remaining
differences are unimportant, and the conflicting statements about the lengths
of the 3rd-5th dorsal spines may probably be attributed to accidental
shortening of the fragile filamentous extensions of these spines.
In so far as my specimens are concerned, the chief growth changes
observable are that the preorbital becomes markedly deeper, the inter-
orbital convexity greater, the 3rd—5th dorsal spines shorter, and the
ventrals shorter with increase in size of the fish. In juveniles the ventrals
reach well along the base of the soft anal, in adults barely beyond the origin
of the spinous fin. I have not seen any very young specimens.
A re-examination of the type of goreensis might be of interest.
Fowler’s specimen described as goreensis (loc. cit.) might be either
that species or orbis, since he does not mention the nature of the dentition.
There is, however, little doubt that the specimen is conspecific with orbis
as here accepted. In the description Fowler stated that the 4th dorsal
spine varies from 1-6-2-3 in length of body, whereas in the figure it is
shown to be much shorter, about 3. Also the shape of the anal fin in the
figure agrees neither with that shown for goreensis (C. and V., loc. cit., and
Pellegrin, loc. cit.) nor with that of my specimens of orbis.
T. orbis is only an occasional capture in the nets at Durban, and is
apparently hardly ever encountered during the winter months. There
appears to be no record of its occurrence any distance south of Durban.
I have recently received a large collection of representative fishes from
the coast of Tanganyika Territory (collected during the summer months),
and since orbis was not among them it may be concluded that it is not
abundant even in the neighbourhood of the type locality.
Nothing is known of the habits of this species, but they probably
resemble those of Plataxz and Drepane, and it probably lives chiefly among
reefs. None of the specimens I have examined have been sexually mature.
I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of
the South African Museum, for the loan of material and literature. Also
to the Carnegie Research Fund (through the Research Grant Board of
South Africa) for generous financial assistance.
ALBANY MuSsEvUM,
GRAHAMSTOWN,
May 1935.
Plate X XI.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXIII.
Smith. | Neill & Co., Ltd.
Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr., Vol. XXIII. Plate XXII.
Tripterodon orbis Plyfr. x 1.
Stained and cleared specimen showing skeleton, with upper half of the paired structures removed.
Smith. Neill & Co., Lid.
Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXIII. | Plate XXIII.
Tripterodon orbis Plytr.
A. Showing structure of air-bladder. B. 7th lateral line scale. C. Scale above lateral
line below spinous dorsal. Scales from specimen 185 mm. in length. The lines below
B and C represent 1 mm.
Smith. . Neill & Co., Ltd.
253.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXIV.
Part |. pp. 1—6. Pls. | and Il. June, 1936.
TWO INTERESTING NEW FISHES FROM SOUTH AFRICA.*
By J. L. B. Smrra.
(With Plates I and II, and two Text-figures.)
(Read September 18, 1935.)
Family SCYMNORHINIDAE.
Regan (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1908 (8), vol. 11, p. 40) defined the family
SQUALIDAE so widely as to include even genera such as Pristiophorus M & H,
which are to-day generally accorded full family rank. Scymnorhinus
Bonap. and Echinorhinus Blnv., and their relatives, without fin-spines,
appear to merit family distinction from the SquaLipAE. Actually certain
authorities favour even recognition of the families ECHINORHINIDAE and
SCYMNORHINIDAE as distinct one from the other. Although this appears to
set rather narrow limits for family distinction, it is accepted here.
Scymnorhinus Bonap. replaces Scymnus Cuv., preoccupied (Kugelman
1814, a genus of Beetles). These two genera are sometimes accepted as
synonyms of Dalatias Raf. (1810), but according to Jordan and Evermann
(The Genera of Fishes, 1917, p. 97) this is not established, and is not accepted
here.
Scymnorhinus has not previously been recorded from South Africa. A
new species of that genus is described below.
Scymnorhinus brevipinnis n. sp.
No anal fin, no fin-spines, no nictitating membrane.
Greatest depth of body 9-10 in total length. First gill-slit about mid-
way between tip of snout and origin of first dorsal. Longitudinal diameter
of orbit 7-5-8-5, vertical diameter 19-22, prespiracular distance 4:5, preoral
length 6-:2-6:4, width of mouth 6-0-6-3 in distance from tip of snout to
origin of first dorsal. Inner internasal distance 1-8 in preoral length.
Interspiracular distance 1-5 in prespiracular length.
Mouth transverse, lower lip thick, no labial folds. A straight longitu-
dinal groove from each corner of mouth. 19 compressed triangular teeth
in lower jaw. The central (anterior) tooth erect, the remainder oblique,
* The Council desires to acknowledge the receipt of a grant from the Carnegie
Corporation through the Research Grant Board towards the cost of printing this paper.
VOL. XXIV, PART I. 1
254
2 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
increasingly so posteriorly. Edges serrate, 19-26 fine serrae on each edge
(fig. 2). Behind the single row of functioning teeth are four overlapping
rows of inwardly depressed teeth in succession. 19 series of teeth in upper
jaw, narrow and pointed: central tooth almost vertical, remainder oblique,
edges entire. The second row close behind the first, and behind these three
more rows in succession. |
First dorsal inserted midway between origin of second dorsal and hind
margin of eye, 2-2—2-3 times nearer origin of pectorals than origin of second
dorsal, 1-7 times than origin of ventrals, and twice as far from hind margin
of caudal as from snout tip. Second dorsal 1-2 times further from hind
es eer -—— oo
“Ne
.
ve
’
H ‘
'
‘
i :
. '
‘
+ [om
ns a .
eA
. vl »
. ; . 4
‘
. ’
coy
er
‘ !
. . . 4
ae | Set
“ i
s
1
A
_ Text-rica. 2.—Dentition of Scymnorhinus brevipinnis n. sp.
A. Anterior teeth of lower jaw. 3B. Posterior tooth of same.
C. Anterior teeth of upper jaw; those in second row with interrupted outline.
: 7 (All x 2:3.)
margin of caudal than from origin of first dorsal. Three-quarters of ventral
base in advance of second dorsal. First dorsal about as long as second,
slightly less than prespiracular length. Base of first dorsal 1:5, base of
second dorsal 1-2 in length of first dorsal. Length of ventrals 1-3 in, base
of ventrals 1-3 times, length of first dorsal. Pectorals 1-3-1-4 times length
of first dorsal.
Depth of gill-openings about equal to longitudinal diameter of eye.
Nostrils more or less rounded, separated, no cirri or oronasal grooves. A
slight depression in lower surface of snout between nostrils. Spiracles
large.
255
Lwo Interesting New Fishes from South Africa 3
Caudal lobes small: greatest transaxial width of caudal fin scarcely
greater than prespiracular length.
The whole body and head covered with small scales, each more or less
quadrate, having a dorsal ridge terminating in a stout spine, usually also
one or two minute basal spines.
Colour.—Uniform dark brown, slightly lighter below. Tips of fins
slightly lighter.
Length.—T70-1100 mm.
Holotype in the Albany Museum.
Three specimens examined.
These interesting fishes were taken by the trawler ‘‘ Algoa Bay” at
a depth of 110-150 fathoms, some 35 miles south of Cape Recife, about
34° 32’ §., 25° 42’ E., and were presented by Mr. H. D. Jackson, manager
of Messrs. Irvin & Johnson at Port Elizabeth, who has also previously
donated valuable specimens.
S. brevipinnis is very closely related to the only other species of the
genus that has yet been described, licha Bonn., which has been recorded
from the western North Atlantic and the Mediterranean, from fairly deep
water. Descriptions of that species available to me are exceedingly meagre,
the only figure seen being that of Goode and Bean (Ocean. Ichthy., 1895,
p. 7, fig. 4,* Scymnorhinus lichia). S. brevipinnis appears to differ from —
licha in numerous dimensional relationships, notably in the smaller fins,
the caudal lobes being markedly lower. Also Giinther (Cat. Fish. B.M.,
1861, vol. viii, p. 426), and others, have stated that the teeth of the lower
jaw in licha are oblique in juveniles but erect in adults. In my specimens
of brevipinnis, of which the larger are presumably adults, all but the central
symphysial erect tooth of the lower jaw are oblique, the posterior teeth
very markedly so.
In any case, since a number of South African species of fishes, until
recently held to be identical with those from the northern hemisphere, have
upon detailed comparison of suitable material proved to be distinct, it is
felt expedient to maintain brevipinnis as distinct from licha until such
time as equivalent material from all the recorded areas may be compared.
Jordan and Fowler (Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1903, vol. xxvi, p. 63, Dalatias
licha) have given a very brief account of a stuffed specimen of Scymnorhinus
from Japan, which they have diagnosed as identical with the Atlantic
species. This has been accepted by Regan (loc. cit.). The few details
given by Jordan and Fowler agree neither with my specimens nor with
descriptions and the figure of licha. It was stated, for example, that in the
Japanese specimen the anterior margin of the mouth is before the anterior
border of the eye.
* The text gives fig. 3.
256
4 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Although these fishes are bathybial, and so with little to hinder wide
distribution, they are obviously very sluggish in habit, and it is not unlikely
that a re-examination of the specimen from Japan will establish that it is
a distinct species.
Family TRICHONOTIDAE.
No member of this family has previously been recorded from South
Africa. Records have hitherto been from the Indo-Australian area.
A new species of the genus Taeniolabrus Stndunr. from South Africa is
now described.
Taenolabrus marley n. sp.
(Plates I and IT.)
Body very elongate, sub-quadrangular in cross-section, somewhat deeper
than wide. 7
Depth 12, length of head (tip snout) 5, or (tip lower jaw) 4-7, in length
of body. Eye 6, snout 3-2, postorbital part of head 1-7 in length of head
(tip snout).
Head little depressed, snout very sharp, dorsal profile even. Hyes
prominent, sub-dorsal in position, projecting above the profile, but vision
chiefly lateral. Over the upper margin of the pupil is a small extension
from the iris which divides below into radiating stripes, all of a golden
colour. Anterior adipose eyelid moderately developed. Interorbital very
narrow, with a small longitudinal ridge. Nostrils paired, rounded, minute.
Lower margin of preorbital slightly concave above maxilla. Several pores
and canals on preorbital and snout. Preorbital depth somewhat less than
longitudinal diameter of orbit. Subopercle and interopercle much enlarged,
covering branchiostegals. |
Gill-opening large, membranes free from isthmus, unite beneath the
hind edge of maxilla. Branchiostegals 5. Pseudobranchiae present.
Gill-rakers 3+21, very fine and slender, 1-3 in gill-filaments which are 2
in eye.
_ Vent normal, in front of anal origin.
Mouth large, almost horizontal, slightly protractile. Maxilla partly
concealed beneath preorbital, extends to below middle of orbit. The lower
jaw projects strongly, forming a prominent mental lobe or chin, the upper
jaw almost included. Lower lips finely papillose. Minute curved villiform
teeth in a narrow band in each jaw. Upper jaw with a large dentate
symphysial knob, teeth recurved, slightly enlarged. Minute teeth on
vomer in an angular patch with anterior median projection. Similar small
teeth in a narrow band on palatines. Tongue edentate, apically dilated,
free.
257
Two Interesting New Fishes from South Africa. 5
The intestinal tract is simple, being merely siphonal, the stomach
elongate: no pyloric caeca. Liver bilobed, the lobes even, extending almost
above vent. The presence of a gall-bladder cannot be established. No
air-bladder.
D 47 (or IIT 44) originates slightly behind the base of the pectoral.
Anterior three rays filamentous, spiniform. First two rays detached from
remainder, first 2-0, second 1-8 times head. Third ray 1-5 times head.
The fourth ray is 2 in head and simple but articulated. The remainder are
mostly branched, often very indistinctly so. From the fourth, the rays
increase in length slightly to the 10th and are thereafter subequal.
A 39 (or I 38, the fig., Pl. I, shows 37 in error) originates below the
10th dorsal ray, less than a head length behind head, below the tip of
the pectoral. Ist ray spiniform, ‘short: remainder bifurcated or branched.
Rays gradually increase posteriorly to almost length of dorsal rays.
Pectorals 1-4 in head, inserted fairly low, of 12 branched rays; tip
reaches to 14th lateral scale, above origin of anal.
Ventrals I, 5, inserted close together, in advance of pectorals. Spine
weak: inner ray simple, remainder branched. Ist ray shortest, remainder
increase to 4th, which is filamentous, the total length being 1-4 times the head,
the filament is as long again as the fin, which reaches the origin of the anal.
Caudal broadly hastate, of 13 branched rays, slightly longer than head.
Scales cycloid, longer than wide, with angular hind margin, the edges
meeting at an angle of about 80° (Pl. IJ). Lateral line scales with a deep
notch in hind edge, and a short vertical groove above the tube (PI. II).
41
Lateral line straight, tubules simple. 1.1. 57, Ltr. a? 10 predorsal scales,
1 |
end above hind margin of preopercle. Head naked except for five scales
below the orbit down hind margin of preorbital and 3-4 more behind angle
of mouth along anterior margin of preopercle.
Colour (Alive): ‘‘Above amber, studded with turquoise blue and red
dots. The lower surface faint rosy. Anals and ventrals with numerous
dark red dots. Eye with about twenty golden lines, umbrous red above.”’
(Preserved): Light yellow-brown above with 11 faint darker cross-bars,
wider than eye, not reaching to ventral surface, the first over nape extending
on to opercle, the last below the last dorsal rays. _ Series of dusky bordered
ocelli along the body, 6 series anteriorly, becoming fewer posteriorly: one
ocellus on each lateral line scale. Similar ocelli in about three series along
side of head.
of head darker. Scales, especially dorsal, with dusky margins.
(Fresh) : “ Rosy, shot pale violet. Gamboge edges to scales give
appearance of lines. Pectoral yellow. Outer rays of ventrals
pale blue. Anal rosy with red patch anteriorly. Caudal red,
gamboge tips.” (H. W. Bell-Marley.)
VOL. VII, PART 2. 14
Scales feebly ctenoid. 1.1. 61, 1. tr.
TEXT-FIG. 4.
Mey
o)
des argyrogrammicus (C. & V.).
ipomoi
Prist
287
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 185
Lenetu.—415 mm.
Locauiry.—East London.
A single specimen (H. W. Bell-Marley, No. 946).
I have seen the South African Museum specimen from Natal,
described by Barnard (‘Ann. 8. Afr. Mus.’, vol. xxi, p. 648, 1927)
as filamentosus C. & V. That author stated palatine teeth
to be absezit, but they are present in the specimen, and beiig
incurved are not easy to detect. The South African Museum
specimen and mine are unquestionably conspecific. The gill-
raker count given is that of the former, the gills having been
removed from mine. |
Fowler’s treatment of the Indo-Pacific species of Pristi-
pomoldes Blkr. (loc. cit., pp. 186-193) is not very satisfactory ;
e.g. he uses the number of gill-rakers as his primary key-
character, and gives 12-13 for microdon Stewndachner, and 15-
16 for argyrogrammicus. Then, in a footnote to the
description of the former species he states that microdon
from Okinwa has 15, from Hawaii 16-17 gill-rakers.
The South African species agree best with the diagnosis of
argyrogrammicus C. & V., which is the oldest species. In
Fowler’s descriptions, so little difference of any significance 1s
shown between the four nominal species that it would not be
surprising to find the eventual recognition of only one somewhat
polymorphous form.
Family PLECTORHYNCHIDS.
Pomadasys stridens (Forsk).
Pomadasys stridens (Forsk) ; Fowler, U.S. Nat. Mus., Bull. 100, vol.
xi, p. 319, 1931 (references and synonymy).
Body robust, slightly compressed, not very deep. Head
rather broad, mouth small. Profile of snout low. Depth 3-1,
length of head 3-0 in length of body. Hye 3-7, snout 3-1, inter-
orbital 3-3, postorbital 2-1 in head length. Preopercle with
straight hind edge, finely serrate. Maxilla extends to below
posterior nostril. 9-10 stout gill-rakers on lower limb of anterior
28 8
186 J. L. B. SMITH.
arch, 3-5 in gill-filaments, which are 1-7 in eye. A defined pit
and two anterior pores on chin.
D. XII. 14, inserted above just behind opercular margin.
Spines moderate, Ist 7:5, 2nd 3-8, 3rd 2°8, 4th and 5th longest
2:2 in head ; remainder decrease to the penultimate, and 12th
spine slightly longer. Anterior rays longest subequal 3 in head.
Edge of soft fin gently convex. Base of spinous fin 1-1, of soft
fin 1-6 in head.
A. III 7, inserted below the 4th dorsal ray ; 2nd spine 2:5 in
head, longer and stronger than 3rd. Soft rays 2-2 in head, edge
of fin gently concave, heavily scaled for ? length.
Pectoral 1-1 in head, reaches above anal origin. Ventrals
do not reach vent, 1-6 in head. Caudal moderately forked.
Scales strongly ctenoid. Lateral series about 65, 1. tr. 0
(1. 1. to belly). Tubular lateral line scales 52. About 56 predorsal
scales, extend to above nostrils. 10-12 cheek scales, and 5-6
more on preopercle flange. Anterior lateral line tubes bifid,
single on peduncle.
CoLtour.—Dark brown, slightly lighter below. An indistinct
fairly broad dusky stripe from opercle to caudal; traces of 2
narrow stripes above. Opercular spot doubtful. Fins all dusky,
caudal darkest.
LrenetH.—Up to 177 mm.
LocaLity.—Durban.
Two specimens taken on lines near Durban (H. W. Bell-Marley,
4/35).
This is the first record from South Africa of this Indian
species.
Fowler (° Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil.’, vol. Ixxvii, p. 230, 1925)
described as striatus G. & T. a specimen from Delagoa Bay.
Actually that specimen was probably stridens (see Barnard,
‘Ann. 8. Afr. Mus.’, vol. xxi, p. 680, 1927). Also Fowler (‘ Proc.
Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil.’, vol. lxxxvi, p. 467, fig. 39, 1934) has described
two specimens as striatus G. & 7. which cannot be that species,
but are obviously conspecific with my present specimens.
Actually my specimens and Fowler’s differ in certain particulars
289
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 187
from the usual diagnoses of stridens, and it is possible that
they represent a new species. This cannot be determined with
certamty without comparison with an Indian specimen of
stridens. I have compared the specimens described above with
one of striatus G. & T. of the same size ; the two are certainly
not conspecific. P. stridens is of much darker colour, has a
smaller mouth, and a more robust but shallower body than
striatus. Also the longitudinal stripes are much clearer in all
stadia of the latter species than in stridens.
Family Laprip”.
Pteragogus opercularis Peters. Text-fig. 5.
Pteragogus opercularis Peters; Barnard, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., vol.
xxi, p. 754, 1927.
Body oblong, compressed. Dorsal profile concave before eye,
nape prominent. Depth 2-3, length of head 2-8 in body length.
Kye 6-0, snout 3-0, interorbital 5-2, and postorbital 2-0 in length
of head. Preorbital depth slightly greater than eye. Maxilla
completely concealed beneath preorbital, extends to below
anterior margin of pupil. 4 anterior caniniform teeth in the
front of each jaw, the median pair small and erect, the outer
curved, flaring out and back. 2-3 small posterior canines at
hind edge of upper jaw. A single series of stout conical teeth
along the side of each jaw, close-set, forming a cutting edge.
Outer gill-arch more or less reduced, rakers 5 or 6 on lower
limb, rudimentary. Gill-membranes hidden below interopercles,
united, form a moderate fold across the throat. Preopercle flange
spinate, 24-26 spinules down to lower angle, lower margin entire.
D. XI, 9, inserted above middle of opercle, 1st spine 1-2 times
eye, increase to the last, about 2-5 times eye. Membrane
between spines extended, lobed. Anterior soft ray equal to last
spine, increase to the 6th, 3 times eye, edge of fin rounded.
Depressed rays reach caudal base. |
A. III, 9, inserted below the last dorsal spines. Soft fin in
shape and size like soft dorsal, depressed rays reach beyond
caudal base.
TEXT-FIG. 5.
+ RT
Pteragogus opercularis Peters.
291
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 189
P. 13, 1-8 in head, rounded. Ventrals with first ray filamen-
tous, 1:8 in body length; tip reaches almost to caudal base.
Caudal broadly rounded.
Scales large, upper dorsal and lower ventral scales produced,
forming a sheath for the dorsal and anal fins. Lateral line
continuous, abruptly bent before peduncle. 1. 1. 24, 1. tr. 2/6
(including dorsal sheath). Cheek scales concealed beneath thick,
spongy skm. Opercular bones scaly, scales partly concealed.
Lateral line tubes of anterior scales with an arborescent superior
branch. 5 predorsal scales.
CoLour.—Olive-green above, lighter below. Numerous dark
spots on forehead and above and behind eye. A large ocellus
covering most of opercle. Dark edges to scales above the lateral
line. Fainter dark spots in a series above and below the lateral
line tubes. A dark spot between each pair of the 1st-4th dorsal
spines. Mid-posterior dorsal rays dusky. Caudal reddish. outer
rays alternately ight and dark. Iris golden.
Lenetu.—140 mm.
Locatity.—Durban (H. W. Bell-Marley, 4/35).
A single specimen of this species. Previously recorded from
Mozambique by Peters in 1855, but not hitherto found in Natal
waters.
Family GEMPYLID.
Thyrsitoides marleyi Fowler.
Thyrsitoides marleyi Fowler, Ann. Natal Mus., vol. vi, pt. 2, p. 255,
fig. 2, 1929.
Skin very thin and papery. Body elongate, very compressed,
tapers to peduncle. Depth 8°9, length of head 3:6 in length of
body. Eye 7:0, snout 2-2, interorbital 5-4, and postorbital 2-6
in head length.
Mouth very large ; lower jaw projects strongly; maxilla extends
below anterior margin of eye. A single row of pomted trenchant
teeth in each jaw. Anteriorly in the upper jaw several very
large slender fixed pointed somewhat compressed teeth, one
292
190 J. L. B. SMITH.
smaller anteriorly, depressible. Vomer edentate, fine teeth on
palatines. Tongue covered with minute teeth. Gill-rakers
rudimentary, 4 or 5 fine bi- or trifid processes near angle on lower
margin of anterior arch; remaining upper surface of arch with
fine villiform teeth. Guill-membranes not united, free from
isthmus. Nostrils wide apart, anterior small, circular, posterior
slit-like. Free margin of preopercle round angle undulate,
probably spinate in young. Interorbital with a longitudinal
wide furrow. | |
D. XVIII, 12 + 5, originates above middle of opercle.
Anterior spines longest, Ist 2-8, 2nd 2-3, 3rd and 4th broken,
5th 3-8 in head, thereafter shorter. Anterior rays falcate,
3-5 in head.
A. 13 + 4, inserted below soft dorsal; anterior rays falcate,
somewhat lower than soft dorsal. Pectorals subfalcate, 2:5 in
head. Ventrals close together, first (outer) ray longest, 3-5 in
head. Caudal deeply forked, peduncle cylindrical.
Body largely covered with very fine cycloid scales. densest on
nape, along back from peduncle. A patch behind eye, head
otherwise naked. Two lateral lines, lower branching from upper.
Upper runs from upper angle of operculum to the base-of the
16th (left) or 17th (right) dorsal spme. On the right side this
line has a break with a small inferior branch below the 13th
dorsal ray. 190 scales in upper line (24 to where lower branch
originates). The lower line originates just behind the base of
the 4th dorsal ray, and curves down to run along the middle
of the side to the caudal base. About 310 scales in the lower
branch.
CoLour.—Slaty-blue, shading to grey on belly. Membrane
of spinous dorsal, and tips of caudal and pectoral black.
LenetTH.—590 mm. |
Locatiry.—East London.
A single specimen, presented by the Curator of the East
London Museum. This is an interesting rediscovery of a species
known hitherto only from the type, from which the present
specimen differs only in minutie, despite the disparity in
size.
293
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 191
Family ScomBRIDA.
Sarda chilensis C.& V. Text-fig. 6.
Sarda chilensis C. & V.; Barnard, Ann. 8. Afr. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 800,
1927.
Body fusiform, moderately compressed. Snout conical,
pointed. Depth 4-5, length of head 3-5 in body length. Eye
6-0, snout 2-8, mterorbital 3-4 and postorbital 2:0 in length of.
head. Preorbital depth half eye.
Mouth large, maxilla distally expanded, spatulate; extremity
extends below hind margin of eye. 17-18 moderate compressed
inwardly depressible acute teeth in a single series in each side of
upper jaw. In lower jaw 4 or 5 large sub-conical depressible
teeth anteriorly ; along each side 5-6 large compressed inwardly
depressible teeth, with a few smaller mtermediate. Vomer
edentate, palatines with fine sharp teeth. Gull-membranes
united, free from isthmus. 8 gill-rakers plus one anterior
rudiment on lower limb of anterior arch, longest 1-6 in gill-
filaments, which are equal to eye. Adipose eyelids moderate,
not to pupil. Interorbital broadly convex. with a slight median
longitudinal furrow.
D. XIX, 14 + 7, inserted above hind margin of operculum.
Ist spine 2-8, 2nd and 3rd subequal, longest 2-7 in head ;
remainder graduated shorter, last minute. Soft rays anteriorly
falcate, highest 3-2 in head. Base of spinous dorsal 1-2 times
head.
A. III, 12 + 6, insertéd below end of base of continuous soft
dorsal. In shape and size much as soft dorsal.
Pectorals 2:6 in head, ventrals 3-2 in head, inserted below
pectorals. Caudal lunate. Peduncle depressed, with a single
stout lateral keel, base of caudal with two auxiliary keels, one
above and one below end of peduncular keel.
Scales minute, over whole body. Enlarged scales form a
corselet over pectoral region, from isthmus up, embracing
pectoral, extending up and forwards over nape; a long narrow
extension back along base of spinous dorsal. Lateral line curves
up over pectoral, thence obliquely down to peduncle.
TEXT-FIG. 6.
=
SEHR
eee
*
a
;
t
Sarda chilensis C.& V.
295
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 193
CoLour.—Steel-blue to black above, lighter below. Head
blackish above, with curved dark post-orbital bar. Body with
6-7 narrow longitudinal dark stripes, longest along middle of
side. 12-13 dusky cross-bars, slightly greater than interspaces
fading out on abdomen. Spinous dorsal black anteriorly and
posteriorly, mid-spines lighter. Soft dorsal dusky. Caudal
dark with median light patch in each lobe. Pectorals with
distal central dark patch, margin light. Ventrals dusky
proximally. Anal and all finlets light.
LeneTH.—310 mm.
Locatiry.—Durban.
A single specimen (a ripe female) (H. W. Bell-Marley, 978).
Seldom taken in our area.
The Atlantic species sarda C. & V. is generally held to be
distinct from chilensis C & V., chiefly in having 21 dorsal
spines and the maxilla extending behind the hind margin of the
eye. The two species are evidently very closely related, and
comparison of equivalent stadia may eventually reveal that
they are identical.
Family BLENNIID.
Blennius fascigula Barnard.
Blennius fascigula Brnrd; Smith, Rec. Alb. Mus., p. 152, pl. xvi,
1931 ; Fowler, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., vol. lIxxxvu, p. 404, fig. 36,
1935 (trifascigula). |
A specimen of this species, from Durban, has been received
from Mr. Bell-Marley, who also sent to Fowler the specimens
upon which was based the species trifascigula Fowler as
distinct from fascigula Barnard. Fowler has evidently not
seen the account of specimens of fascigula from East London
(Smith, loc. cit.). I have compared the specimen from Durban
with those from East London, and with the type of fascigula,
and they are all without doubt conspecific. trifascigula 1s
most certainly identical with both the Durban and the Kast
London specimens, and cannot therefore be maintained as
distinct.
296
194 J. L. B. SMITH.
Petroscirtes tapeinosoma Blkr.
Petroscirtes tapeinosoma Blkr.; Smith, Rec. Alb. Mus., vol. iv, p.
213, pl. xxi, B, 1935.
The first record from South Africa of this Indo-Pacific form
was a specimen taken at Great Fish Point in 1934. Two
specimens have recently been obtained in a rock-pool near Kast
London, so that the species is evidently established in our area.
Family CLINID.
NOTE ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES OF CLINUS Cuv. IN
Souto AFRICA.
Until fairly recently it has been accepted that species of
Clinus Cuv. were largely confined to the colder waters charac-
teristic of the coasts of the west and south-western Cape. This
was chiefly due to the fact that the only part of South Africa in
which intensive collecting of these fishes had been carried out
was that particular area.
Within the last few years investigation has shown that
Clinus species extend very much further east into the warmer
waters of the Indian Ocean than had previously been suspected.
Quite a number have been found to occur regularly along the
coast eastwards from False Bay, at least as far as East London.
Quite recently I have found a number of Clinus species
exceedingly abundant as far east as the mouth of the Great Kei
River. It is most probable that continued investigation will
show that these species extend even still further eastwards.
One species, heterodon, C. & V., has actually been traced as
far as North Zululand (Smith, 1934).
The results of recent investigations merit a revised account of
the distribution of Clinus species in South Africa, and this is
summarized below.
297
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 195
Clinus species. Distribution.
acuminatus C. & V. Walfisch Bay to False Bay.
anguillaris C. & V. False Bay to Great Fish Point (S.):
Durban (B.M.).
Knysna estuary.
False Bay to Keimouth (S.).
False Bay ; Great Fish Point (S.).
agilis J. L. B. Smith
brachycephalus C. & V.
brevicristatusG. dT. .
capensis C.¢d V. .
cottoidesC. d& V..
dorsalis Blkr.
fucorum G. & T.
heterodonC. & V.
laurentiiG. @ T. .
latipennis C. & V.
mentalisG. & T.
musG.¢T..
ornatusG. & T.
pavoG.d T.
robustusG. & 7.
striatus G. & T.
superciliosus Linn.
taurus G.d& 7.
venustrisG. ¢& T..
Lambert’s Bay (S.) to East London
(S.): Durban (B.M.).
Lambert’s Bay (S.) to Durban (B.M.).
Walfisch Bay to Keimouth (S.).
False Bay: Port Alfred (8.).
False Bay to North Zululand (S.).
Port Alfred (S.) to Zululand (B.M.).
False Bay.
East London: Durban (B.M.).
False Bay to Keimouth (S.).
False Bay : Knysna (S.).
False Bay (Great Fish Point):
Keimouth (S.).
Table Bay to East London (S.):
Durban (B.M.).
False Bay ; Port Alfred (S.); Durban
(B.M.).
Walfisch Bay to Durban (B.M.).
Cape Peninsula: Plettenberg Bay (S8.).
False Bay : Knysna (S.).
Continuity of observed distribution is indicated by “to” between
localities ; any considerable gap between recorded areas is indicated by a
colon.
(B.M.) = extreme locality fide H. W. Bell-Marley.
(S.) = extreme locality fide J. L. B. Smith.
Other limits as given by Barnard (° Ann. 8. Afr. Mus.’, vol. xxi, pp. 852-—
866, 1927).
Nemacoclinus navalis Barnard.
Nemacoclinus navalis Barnard, Ann. 8. Afr. Mus., vol. xxx, p. 646,
fig. 1, 1935.
Body compressed, elongate. Depth 5-8, head 4:5 in body
length. Snout pointed, sub-conical. Hye 4-3, snout 4:4, and
interorbital 7-5 in head length.
298
196 J. L. B. SMITH.
Mouth moderate, maxilla extends to below middle of eye.
Teeth in jaw subequal, minute teeth in a band on vomer. A
short, apically dilated, fringed supraorbital tentacle. Mucous
pores on head opening by a series of transversely opposed pores.
D. XXXIV, 1 originates over hind preopercle margin. Anterior
three spines widely spaced, first two remote from third. 1st and
4th spines shortest, scarcely greater than eye, remainder sub-
equal about 1:7 times eye. Soft ray shorter than last spine;
membrane reaches caudal base.
A. II, 23; V, I, 3, inner ray small, adnate. Caudal rounded.
Lateral line complete, almost to caudal base; tubes with
transverse tubes above and below, each opening by a pore,
exactly opposed. 80 cross tubules.
CoLour.—Olive-green, mottled red-brown, fins greenish.
LeNeTH.—66 mm.
Locatity.—Great Fish Point.
A single specimen, taken in a rock pool.
This species has been known only from the type, taken at
Simonstown. Its rediscovery at a point so far distant is of
interest. Since the very intensive collecting of Clinids about
the Cape Peninsula by the late W. Thompson, no new species
have been taken in that area until navalis was discovered in
1934. Durmg the past six years I have collected Clinid fishes
most intensively from a stretch of rocks at Great Fish Point, so
that had navalis been a normal inhabitant of that area, it
could scarcely have escaped detection. Actually my specimen
was taken only a short time after the discovery of the orthotype
at Simonstown. In the circumstances it might be supposed
that navalis has but recently appeared on our coasts.
Barnard has regarded navalis as generically distinct from
Clinus Cuv. on the character of the lateral line, which in that
latter genus is generally stated to have the lateral line tubes
simple, opening by a single pore. Actually several species
(e.g. capensis C. & V.) have at least the anterior portion of
the lateral line of structure similar to that in Nemacoclinus.
Our species of Clinus Cuwv. are in need of revision, since they
fall into groups which appear to merit generic distinction, on
299
NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 197
grounds at least as valid as those accepted by Barnard for genera
such as Nemacoclinus Brnrd., Clinoporus Brnrd., and
Petraites Ogilby. |
Family GopiuD4a.
Gobius callidus nom. nov.
Gobius gulosus J. L. B. Smith, Trans. Roy. Soc. 8.A., vol. xxiv, pt. I,
p. 49, fig. 2, 1936.
It has been found that the name gulosus has previously been
used for an American species of the genus, callidus is therefore
proposed to replace gulosus for the South African species.
I wish to express my gratitude to the Research Grant Board
of South Africa (Carnegie Fund) for financial assistance in this
work.
Albany Museum,
Grahamstown ;
August, 1936.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI,
Illustrating Dr. J. L. B. Smith’s paper, ‘‘ New Records
of South African Fishes ”’.
Holocentrum sammara fForsk. xX 1:7.
Plicklk
Ann. Natal Mus., Vol. VIII.
ae oar |
HOLOCENTRUM SAMMARA Forsk
Ltd.
Adlard & Son,
INDEX TO VOLUMES | and Il
Volume | ends at page 300
VALID SCIENTIFIC NAMES are in plain capitals.
Page in heavy type shows a description on that page.
Synonyms and Malidentifications are in italics.
An asterisk shows that there is an illustration on that page in the text.
Acanthidium natalense 272
ACAN THIDIUM QUADRISPINOSUM 270,
ACANTHOCEPOLA 173
AGANTHOCEPOLA CUNEATUS 171-3 PI.
ACANTHOCEPOLA LIMBATA 172
ACANTHOPAGRUS 307, 311, 313, 314-5,
ACANTHOPAGRUS' BERDA 311, 314,
315—6*—7, 320 Pl. 18
ACANTHOPAGRUS BIFASCIATUS 311,
315, 317-8*—320 Pls. 18, 24
ACTINISTIA 389, 391, 393, 412*, 415
ACUMINATUS, CLINUS 11, 297
ACUTIPENNIS, GOBIUS 386
ADENI, PERISTEDION 69, 71-3 Pl. 22
AENEOFUSCUS, GOBIUS 233, 234
AEROSTATICUS, (TETRODON) 208
AESTUARIUS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 317
AESTUARIUS, GILCHRISTELLA 235
AENEUM, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363, 364
Pls. 22, 29; p. 526
AFER, BARBUS 267
AFRICANA, TRIGLA (TRIGLOPORUS)
73, 74-6 Pl. 23
AGILIS, CLINUS 10, 11 Pl. 16; p. 297
AGONOSTOMUS 79
ATBOFASCIATUS, BATRICHTHYS 59, 60
ALBULA VULPES 51
albus, Dentex 370, 373
ALEPISAURIDAE 154
ALEPISAURUS FEROX 154
ALGOAE, CAESIO 173
ALTAVELA, (PTEROPLATEA) 46, 47
ALUTERES 238, 240-1
ALUTERES MONOCEROS 238, 240, 241-4
Pls. 40, 41, 43
ALUTERES SCRIPTUS 240-1, 243-4 Pl. 42
ALUTERIDAE 238, 239
AMBLYAPISTUS BINOTATA 543
AMBLYAPISTUS MARLEYI 12
Amblyapistus marleyi 543
AMIA 501
Amphiprionichthys zeylonicus 13
AMPHIPRIONIDAE 183
ANABAS 230
ANABAS BAINSII 230, 231 Pl. 33
ANABAS CAPENSIS 230-1, 237 Pl. 33
ANABAS SCANDENS 230
ANABAS TESTUDINEUS 230
Anabas vicinus 231
ANABATIDAE 218, 230
ANGLICUS, CHR YSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1,
347-8*, 380 Pls. 19, 24; p. 526
ANGUILLA MOSSAMBICA 227
ANGUILLARIS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297
ANGUILLARIS, PLOTOSUS 226 Pl. 34
ANGUILLIDAE 218, 227
ANOPLUS, BARBUS 219, 220, 231 Pl. 29; p.
267
APHAREUS 535
APLOACTIDAE 202
AQUILA, (MYLIOBATIS) 147, 148
ARGENTATUS, (CLINUS) 197
ARGYROGRAMMICUS, PRISTIPO-
MOIDES 28S, 286*-7
ARGYROPS 305, 311, 313, 333, 370, 525
ARGYROPS FILAMENTOSUS 311, 333-
335, 525
ARGYROPS SPINIFER 311, 333, 334-5 Pls.
20, 25; p. 525
ARGYROZONA 374, 378
argyrozona, Dentex 378
ARGYROZONA, POLYSTEGANUS 308%,
368, 374, 378 Pls. 21, 27
ARMATUS, (GRAMMONUS) 53
ATER, (GRAMMONUS) 53
ATHERINIDAE 156
ATLANTICUS, (HOPLOSTETHUS) 162
atricauda, (Sardinella) 150
auratus, Mugil 80-1, 106, 108, 120, 122-3
AURATA, (SPARUS) 314, 320
AURIVENTRIS, AUSTROSPARUS 308%,
311, 319-325*, 326*-7, 362 Pls. 18, 23; p. 512
auriventris, Austrosparus 545-548
auriventris, Diplodus 325, 547
AUROLINEATUS, GNATHODENTEX 398,
541
AUSTRALIS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 315,
320 .
AUSTROSPARUS 307, 311, 313, 315, 319-
321, 327, 330, 545, 546-7
AUSTROSPARUS AURIVENTRIS 308%,
311, 319-325*, 326*—7, 362 Pls. 18, 23; p. 512
Austrosparus auriventris 545-548
AUSTROSPARUS GLOBICEPS 311, 320,
321-2*-3, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545, 546-9
AUSTROSPARUS SARBA 311, 319-323-4*,
327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545-6, 547-9
Austrosparus sarba 325
AUSTROSPARUS TRICUSPIDENS 546,
548-9
AXELIA 425, 447
AXELIA ROBUSTA 501, 505
AXILLARIS, (CAESIO) 174
Volume | ends at page 300
AXILLARIS, DASCYLLUS 183-5 PI. 22
AXINECEPS 374, 379
BAGRIDAE 218, 225
BAHIENSIS, (CYPSELURUS) 160
BAINSII, ANABAS 230, 231 PI. 33
BALINENSIS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3,
33-4
BALISTES CONSPICILLUM 210
BALISTIDAE 210, 238-240
BARBUS 218, 219
BARBUS AFER 267
BARBUS ANOPLUS 219, 220, 231 Pl. 29;
BARBUS BROOKINGI 219, 221 Pl. 30
BARBUS BURCHELLI 219, 223 Pl. 30
BARBUS CAPENSIS 219, 221 Pl. 30
BARBUS GILCHRISTI 219, 222 Pl. 29
BARBUS HEMIPLEUROGRAMMA 219,
223 Pi. 29
BARBUS HOLUBI 216, 219, 222 Pl. 31
BARBUS PALUDINOSUS 219, 221 Pl. 30
BARBUS SENTICEPS 219, 220*, 266*
BARBUS TREVELYANI 219 Pl. 29
BARBUS VULNERATUS 219, 223 Pl. 31
barnardi, Myxus 81, 90, 93
BARNARDI, SYNAPTURA 4, 5* Pl. 16
BATRACHOIDES 59
BATRACHOIDIDAE 49, 58
BATRICHTHYS 49, 58-9
BATRICHTHYS ALBOFASCIATUS 59, 60
belanak, Mugil 129
BENNETTI, (POMADASYS) 181, 182
BERDA, ACANTHOPAGRUS 311-
315-6*—7, 320 Pl. 18
BIDENICHTHYS 566
BIDENICHTHYS CAPENSIS 566
BIFASCIATUS, ACANTHOPAGRUS 31],
315, 317-8*—320 Pls. 18, 24
bifasciatus, (Austrosparus) 323, 547
BIFILUM, BLENNIUS 190-1 PI. 20
BINOTATA, AMBLYAPISTUS 543
bipinnulatus, Elacate 178
BITORQUATUS, GYMNOCRANIUS 536,
537
bleekeri, Doryichthys 49
BLENNIIDAE 8, 189, 295
BLENNIUS 191
BLENNIUS BIFILUM 190-1 Pl. 20
BLENNIUS CORNUTUS 189
BLENNIUS FASCIGULA 8 Pl. 16; p. 295
Blennius trifascigula 295
BLOCHI], PACHYMETOPON 311, 363-4
Pls. 22, 28, 29
BOOPSOIDEA 304-5, 311, 350, 351
BOOPSOIDEA INORNATA 311, 351-2 Pls.
22, 28
borneensis, Mugil 120
BORO, PISOODONOPHIS 273
BOX 304-5
BRACHYCEPHALUS, CLINUS 11, 297
BRACHYURUS, MICROPHIS 49*, 50
BREVIORISTATUS, CLINUS 11, 297
BREVIPINNIS, SCYMNORHINUS
253-4*-5
BROOKINGI, BARBUS 219, 221 Pl. 30
BROTULA PALMIETENSIS 198 Pl. 21
BROTULIDAE 52-3, 198, 306, 566
BUCHANANI, MUGIL 81-2, 89, 113-4*-5,
131 Pls. 16, 20
BURCHELLI, BARBUS 219, 223 Pl. 30
caeruleomaculatus, Mugil 95, 113, 115
CAERULEOMACULATUS, MUGIL 128,
130-1
CAESIO ALGOAE 173
calabaricus, (Hemirhamphus) 36, 39
calabaricus schlegeli, Hemirhamphus 39
CALLIDUS, GOBIUS 223-4*, 299
CALLIONYMIDAE 165
CANADUS, RHACHICENTRUM 177-8
CANALICULATUS, MUGIL 81-2, 89, 113,
120—2*-3, 130, 132 Pls. 16, 17, 18
CANARIENSIS, (PTEROPLATEA) 46
CANESCENS, PACHYMETOPON 311,
363-4
CANTHARUS 304
CAPENSIS, ANABAS 230-1, 237 Pl. 33
CAPENSIS, BARBUS 219, 221 Pl. 30
CAPENSIS, BIDENICHTHYS 566
capensis, Champsodon 192
CAPENSIS, CHELIDONICHTHYS 68
CAPENSIS, CLINUS 11, 297-8
capensis, Coracinus 138, 144
CAPENSIS, DICHISTIUS 137-139, 143-6 PI.
13; p. 301-2 Pl. 10; p. 557-8*-9
CAPENSIS, DIPLODUS 150, 331
capensis, Dipterodon 138-9, 144
CAPENSIS, HIPPOCAMPUS 149, 150
CAPENSIS, LABEO 224 Pl. 31
CAPENSIS, MERLUCCIUS 158, 206
capensis, Mugil 108, 110
CAPITO, MUGIL 79, 83, 88, 102,
103—4*-5*-7, 110, 13] Pls. 17, 19
CARACANTHUS ZEYLONICUS 13
CARANGIDAE 174, 279
CARANTHUS 304-5
CARANX 280
CARANX GYMNOSTETHOIDES 279, 280
CARPIO, CYPRINUS 224
cauda lunata, (Coracinus) 138
CENTRARCHIDAE 218, 237
cephalotus, (Mugil) 90
CEPHALUS, MUGIL 79, 81, 83, 88, 90,
91*-5, 123, 130, 132 Pl. 15; p. 232*
CEPOLIDAE 171
CERVINUS, DIPLODUS 170
CERVUS, MYLIOBATIS 147, 148*
CESTRAEUS 79
CETOMIMIDAE 158
CETOMIMUS PICKLEI 158-9
ceylonensis, Mugil 81, 113, 115
Chaetodipterus 188
CHAETODIPTERUS 246
Chaetodipterus faber 187-8
Chaetodipterus goreensis 188, 248, 250-2
Chaetodipterus orbis 188, 250
Chaetodon cingulatus 284
CHAETODON KLEINII 284
CHAETODON MARLEYI 176-7 Pl. 22
Chaetodon nigripinnatus 282, 284
CHAETODON SETIFER 247
CHAETODON TRIFASCIATUS 280-1
CHAETODON XANTHOCEPHALUS
282-3*
CHAETODONTIDAE 176, 246-7, 280
Volume | ends at page 300
CHALUMNAE, LATIMERIA 387-8*-390,
391-4 Pls. 3-7, 403-5*—7*-8-409-415 Pls.
1-3; p. 425-426-522 19 figs. 44 pls.
CHAMPSODON CAPENSIS 192
CHARAX 304-5
CHEIMERIUS 368, 370
CHEIMERIUS NUFAR 368, 370-1*-3 Pls.
21, 27
CHELIDONICHTHYS 61, 68
CHELIDONICHTHYS CAPENSIS 68
CHELIDONICHTHYS KUMU 68
CHELIDONICHTHYS QUEKETTI 68*
CHILENSIS, SARDA 293, 294*-5
CHORISOCHISMUS DENTEX 563
CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 314, 320, 331, 335,
338, 339-40, 551
CHRYSOBLEPHUS ANGLICUS 311, 340-1,
347-8*, 380 Pls. 19, 24; p. 526
CHRYSOBLEPHUS CRISTICEPS 311, 340—
342*-7 Pls. 20, 26; pp. 551, 552*-6
Chrysoblephus cristiceps 343
CHRYSOBLEPHUS GIBBICEPS 311, 337,
340-1, 345-7 Pls. 19, 26
CHRYSOBLEPHUS LATICEPS 311, 340,
341 Pls. 19, 26
CHRYSOBLEPHUS LOPHUS 311, 340-1,
346-7, 551
CHRYSOBLEPHUS PUNICEUS 311, 340-1,
343-4*_5, 526, 551-2, 554-5*-6
CHRYSOPHRYS 304
Chrysophrys haffara 547
Chrysophrys natalensis 323, 547
Chrysophrys sarba 547
CICHLIDAE 84, 218, 228
CILIARIS, PAGRUS 334
cingulatus, Chaetodon 284
CLARIAS 225
CLARIAS GARIEPINUS 225
CLINIDAE 10, 195, 296
CLINOPORUS 299
CLINUS 51, 197, 296-8
CLINUS ACUMINATUS 297
CLINUS AGILIS 10-1 Pl. 16; p. 297
CLINUS ANGUILLARIS 297
CLINUS BRACHYCEPHALUS 11, 297
CLINUS BREVICRISTATUS 11, 297
CLINUS CAPENSIS 11, 297-8
CLINUS COTTOIDES 297
CLINUS DORSALIS 11, 297
CLINUS FUCORUM 297
CLINUS HETERODON 195 PI. 22; pp. 296-7
CLINUS LATIPENNIS 297 .
CLINUS LAURENTII 196—8*, 297
CLINUS MENTALIS 197, 297
CLINUS MUS 1], 297
CLINUS ORNATUS 11, 197, 297
CLINUS PAVO 11, 297
CLINUS ROBUSTUS 196, 297
CLINUS STRIATUS 11, 197, 297
CLINUS SUPERCILIOSUS 11, 297
CLINUS TAURUS 196, 297
CLINUS VENUSTRIS 196, 297
CLUPEIDAE 150, 218, 235
COCCOTROPUS 202
COCCOTROPUS JUBATUS 201 Pl. 18
COELACANTH = see LATIMERIA
CHALUMNAE
COELACANTHIDAE 388*-9, 393-4,
413-4*_5, 420-422
COELACANTHUS GRANULATUS 437
COERULEOPUNCTATUS, POLYSTEGA-
NUS 368, 373, 374-6 Pls. 22, 28
commersoni, (Hemirhamphus) 24
COMMERSONI, (SCOMBEROMORUS) 189
COMPRESSUS, MUGIL 81, 89, 115—7*-8,
131 Pls. 17, 20
CONGIOPODUS TORVUS 51
CONSPICILLUM, BALISTES 210
conspicillum, Pachynathus.210
constantiae, Mugil 90
Coracinus 137-8
Coracinus capensis 138, 144
CORNUTA, (MYLIOBATIS) 147
CORNUTUS, BLENNIUS 189
CORYPHAENOIDIDAE 154
CORYZICHTHYS 59, 60
COTTOIDES, CLINUS 11, 297
CRENIDENS 304-5, 311, 357, 360
CRENIDENS CRENIDENS 311, 360, 361*
Pls. 22, 26
CRENIDENS, CRENIDENS 311, 360, 361*
Pls. 22, 26
CRENILABIS, MUGIL 88, 99*, 100, 130,
274-5
CRISTICEPS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311,
340-1, 342*-7 Pls. 20, 26; pp. 551, 552*-6
cristiceps, Chrysoblephus 343
CRISTICEPS, POLYAMBLYODON
(LEPTOMETOPON) 527*, 528-9*, 530*-2
Pl. 50
CROSSOPTERYGII 411, 412*, 415
CUBICEPS NATALENSIS 200
CUNEATUS, ACANTHOCEPOLA | 171-3
Pl. 21
CUNNESIUS, MUGIL 129, 130
cunnesius, Mugil 81, 96, 98
CURVIDENS, GYMNOCROTAPHUS 311,
358*
CUVIERI, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 315
CYMATOCEPS 311, 314, 337-8
CYMATOCEPS NASUTUS 311-2, 338-9*,
382 Pls. 20, 25; p. 512
CYPRINODONTIDAE 272
CYPRINIDAE 218, 266
CYPRINUS 218, 224
CYPRINUS CARPIO 224
CYPSELURUS HEWITTI 159
CYPSILURUS 26
DALATIAS 253
DALATIAS LICHA 255
DALGLEISHI, XENOLEPIDICHTHYS
162-3 Pl. 18
DARWINI, GEPHYROBERYX 162
DASCYLLUS AXILLARIS 183-5 Pl. 22
DASYBATIDAE 43
DECAPTERUS LAJANG 174-5 PI. 21
DELAGOAE, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3, 31-4
Pls. 10, 12
DELAGOAE, NEMIPTERUS 542
DENTATA, PORCOSTOMA 311, 349, 350
Pls. 20, 25
DENTEX 183, 304-5, 367-8, 370, 373, 381,
399, 533, 536
Dentex albus 370, 373
Dentex argyrozona 378
DENTEX, CHORISOCHISMUS 563
Volume | ends at page 300
Dentex filamentosus 399
Dentex filosus 370, 372, 376, 556
Dentex lineopunctatus 374-6
DENTEX MATSUBARAE 367
Dentex miles 370, 373
Dentex natalensis 374
Dentex nufar 370, 371, 373
DENTEX PERONII 367
Dentex rivulatus 533, 537, 541
Dentex robinsoni 533, 537
Dentex rupestris 371
Dentex variabilis 37\
DENTICIDAE 303, 308*-9, 337, 366-8, 381,
532-534, 556
DERMATOPSIS 566, 568
DERMATOPSIS KASOUGAE 566—7*-8
DERMATOPSIS MICRODON 568
DERMATOPSIS MULTIRADIATUS 568
DIABOLUS, MOBULA 561, 569
diadema, Mugil 81, 115, 117-8
DIAPHUS 17-19
(DIAPHUS) ELUCENS, MYCTOPHUM
152—3*
DICHISTIIDAE 135, 137, 301, 557
DICHISTIUS 135, 136, 137, 138, 302
DICHISTIUS CAPENSIS 137-139, 140, 143-6
Pl. 13; pp. 301-2 Pl. 10; pp. 557-8 *-9
DICHISTIUS FALCATUS 138-9, 141, 142-4
146 Pls. 14, 17
DICHISTIUS MULTIFASCIATUS — 138-9,
141, 144-6 Pls. 15, 16
DIPLOCERCIDES 421
DIPLOCERCIDES KAYSERI 477
DIPLODUS 304-5, 307, 311, 313-5, 319, 321,
327, 330-1, 546
Diplodus auriventris 325, 547
Diplodus capensis 150
DIPLODUS CERVINUS 170
DIPLODUS SARGUS 311, 320, 331-2* Pls.
19, 24
DIPLODUS TRIFASCIATUS 311, 33),
332-3* Pls. 19, 24
Dipterodon \37-8
Dipterodon capensis 138-9, 144
DORSALIS, CLINUS 11, 297
Doryichthys bleekeri 49
DREPANE 137, 245-6, 252
DREPANIDAE 245-247
Drepanoscorpis 137-8, 146
Drepanoscorpis gilchristi 138, 144, 146
Dulosparus 334
DURBANENSIS, SPARODON 311, 321,
328-9 *-330 Pls. 18, 23
durbanensis, Sparus 328
DUSSUMIERI, HEMIRHAMPHUS 23,
30-1, 34
ECHINORHINIDAE 253
ECHINORHINUS 253
ECKLONIACHTHYS 561
ECKLONIAICHTHYS SCYLLIORHINI-
CEPS 561-2*-3
Elacate 178
Elacate bipinnulatus 178
Elacate nigra 177
Elagatis 178
ELEOTRIDAE 264
ELEOTRIS LIMOSUS 264-5 Pls. 4, 5
ELEOTRIS MADAGASCARIENSIS 265
ELEOTRIS OPHIOCEPHALUS 265
ELOPS 79
ELUCENS, MYCTOPHUM (DIAPHUS)
152-3*
EMARGINATUM, SPONDYLIOSOMA
311, 362 Pls. 22, 29
engeli, Mugil 97-8
EPHIPPIDAE 245-6
EPHIPPINAE 248
EPHIPPUS 245-7, 248*-9
. EPINEPHELUS 80
EPINEPHELUS FLAVOCAERULEUS 168
Pl. 22
ERYTHRORINCHUS,
PHUS) 31
EURONOTUS, MUGIL 81-4, 88, 100-1 *-3,
110, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 16, 17, 19; p. 232*, 233
EXOCOETIDAE 41, 159
(HEMIRHAM-
faber, Chaetodipterus 187-8
FALCATUS, DICHISTIUS 138-9, 141, 142-4,
146 Pls. 14, 16
FALCIFORMIS, MONODACTYLUS 235
Pl. 34
FAR, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3, 24-8, 30, 40
Pls. 10, 12
FARIO FARIO, SALMO 236, 237
FARIO IRIDEUS, SALMO 236, 237
FARIO, SALMO FARIO 236, 237
fasciatus, Hemirhamphus 24, 27
FASCIGULA, BLENNIUS 8 PI. 16; p. 295
FAUREI, LEPIDOTRIGLA 62, 63-5 Pls. 16,
18, 19
FEROX, ALEPISAURUS 154
fidjiensis, (Setarches) 57, 58
FILAMENTOSUS, ARGYROPS 311, 333-
335, 525
filamentosus, Dentex 399
filamentosus, Pristipomoides 287
filosus, Dentex 370, 372, 376, 556
FITZSIMONSI, HALIEUTEA 211-2 PI. 23
fitzsimonsi, Halieutichthys 211
FLAVOCAERULEUS, EPINEPHELUS 168
Pl. 22
FLORENTII, MYCTOPHUM (NASO-
LYCHNUS) 18 Pl. 9
frenatus, Gymnocranius 536, 537
FUCORUM, CLINUS 11, 297
GADIDAE 158, 306
GALAXIAS 236
GALAXIAS ZEBRATUS 236 PI. 34
GALAXIIDAE 218, 236
GARIEPINUS, CLARIAS 225
GEMPYLIDAE 291
GEORGII, (HEMIRHAMPHUS) 38
GEPHYROBERYX DARWINI 162
GEPHYROGLANIS 225, 226
GEPHYROGLANIS SCLATERI 226 PI. 33
GERMANUM, POLYAMBLYODON 311,
366
GERMANUS, POLYAMBLYODON
(POLYAMBLYODON) 527, 528
GIBBICEPS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 337,
340-1, 345-7 Pls. 19, 26
GIBBOSUM, PACHYMETOPON 526-7
Volume | ends at page 300
GIBBOSUS, LACTOPHRYS 209
GIBBOSUS, POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTO-
METOPON) 528 531
gigas, (Myctophum) 152-3
GILCHRISTELLA 235
GILCHRISTELLA AESTUARIUS 235
GILCHRISTI, BARBUS 219, 222 Pl. 29
gilchristi, Drepanoscorpis 138, 144, 146
GILCHRISTI, HOPLOSTETHUS 160-2 PI.
22
GIRELLIDAE 135-6, 246, 305, 360
GIURIS, GOBIUS 233, 234, 263
GLAUCOSOMA PEAOLOPESI 396-7*
GLAUCUM, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363,
365—6
GLOBICEPS, AUSTROSPARUS 311, 320,
321-2*—3, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545, 546-9
GNATHODENTEX 534-6, 541
GNATHODENTEX AUROLINEATUS 398
GOBIESOCIDAE 561
GOBIIDAE 193, 218, 233, 259, 299, 385, 564
GOBIUS 194, 233
GOBIUS ACUTIPENNIS 386
GOBIUS AENEOFUSCUS 233, 234
GOBIUS CALLIDUS 233, 234*, 299
GOBIUS GIURIS 233, 234, 263
GOBIUS GULOSUS 261-2*-3, 299
GOBIUS KEIENSIS 385-6*
GOBIUS VONBONDEI 259-261 * Pls. 3, 5
goreensis, Chaetodipterus 188, 248, 250-2
gracile, Peristedion 69-71
GANGENE, (CORYZICHTHYS) 59, 60
graminis, (Clinus) 195
GRAMMICOLEPIDAE 1, 162, 187
GRAMMONUS 52
GRAMMONUS OPISTHODON 82 PI. 6
GRANDE, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363,
365-6, 526
GRANDOCULIS, (MONOTAXIS) 542
GRANUALTUS, COELACANTHUS 437
GRISEUS, GYMNOCRANIUS 532-3, 536,
537, 539*-541 Pl. 58
GRUNNIENS, (BATRICHTHYS) 59
GUENTHERI, (SETARCHES) 58
GULOSUS, GOBIUS 261-2*-3, 299
GUNTHERI, SETARCHES 57-8 Pl. 6
GURNADUS, (TRIGLA) 73-5
GYMNOCRANIUS 305, 307-369, 532-536-7,
541-2
GYMNOCRANIUS BITORQUATUS 536,
537
Gymnocranius frenatus 536-7
GYMNOCRANIUS GRISEUS 532-3, 536,
537, 539*-541 Pl. 58
Gymnocranius microdon 536-1
Gymnocranius rivulatus 533
GYMNOCRANIUS ROBINSONI 368, 369
Pls. 21, 27; p. 532
Gymnocranius robinsoni 533, 536-7, 541
GYMNOCRANIUS RUPPELLII 533, 537,
541
GYMNOCROTAPHUS 304-5, 311, 357, 358,
529
GYMNOCROTAPHUS CURVIDENS 311,
358*
GYMNOSTETHOIDES, CARANX 279, 280
haffara, Chrysophrys 547
HALIEUTEA 212
HALIEUTEA FITZSIMONSI 211-2 PI. 23
HALIEUTICHTHYS 212
Halieutichthys fitzsimonsi 211
HAPLOCHILUS KATANGAE 272
HAPLOCHILUS MYAPOSAE 273
HAPLOCHROMIS 230
HAPLOCHROMIS MOFFATI 230 Pl. 32
HAPLODACTYLUS, (SCORPAENA) 203
HEMIPLEUROGRAMMA, BARBUS 219,
223 Pl. 29 .
HEMIRHAMPHIDAE 40-2
HEMIRHAMPHUS 21-2, 40-1
HEMIRHAMPHUS BALINENSIS 22-3,
33-4
Hemirhamphus calabaricus schlegeli 39
HEMIRHAMPHUS DELAGOAE 22-3, 31-4
Pls. 10, 12
HEMIRHAMPHUS DUSSUMIERI 23, 30-1,
34 |
HEMIRHAMPHUS FAR 22-3, 24-8, 30, 40
Pls. 10, 12
Hemirhamphus fasciatus 24, 27
HEMIRHAMPHUS IMPROVISUS 22, 24,
34-5*-6, 38 Pl. 11
HEMIRHAMPHUS KNYSNAENSIS 22, 24,
35*, 36-8, 40 Pls. 10, 11
HEMIRHAMPHUS MARGINATUS 22-3,
27-29
HEMIRHAMPHUS SCHLEGELI 22, 24,
35-6, 38, 39, 40
HETERODON, CLINUS 195 PI. 22; p. 296-7
HEWITTI, CYPSELURUS 159
HEWITTI, PRIONOLEPIS 1, 3*
hewitti, Prionolepis 187
HIPPOCAMPUS CAPENSIS 149, 150
hoefleri, Mugil 122
HOLOCENTRIDAE 275
HOLOCENTRUM SAMMARA 275 PI. 11
HOLUBI, BARBUS 216, 219, 222 PI. 31
HOLUBI, SARGUS 327
HOPLEGNATHIDAE 169
HOPLEGNATHUS ROBINSONI 169-170
Pl. 18
HOPLOSTETHUS GILCHRISTI 160-2 Pi. 22
HORRIDA, SYNANCEIA 543-4
Hyporhamphus 2\-2
IMPROVISUS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22, 24,
34-6, 38 Pl. 11
INDICA, (ACANTHOCEPOLA) 172
INDICUS, PLATYCEPHALUS 204-6 PI. 20
INDICUS, PSENES 53
INORNATA, BOOPSOIDEA 311, 351-2 Pls.
22, 28 |
insidator, Platycephalus 204
IRIDEUS, SALMO FARIO 236, 237
ISO NATALENSIS 156-7
ITOSIBI, NEOTHUNNUS 185*
JACKSONI, TAENIOIDES 564—5*—6
JABATUS, COCCOTROPUS 201 PI. 18
KASOUGAE, DERMATOPSIS 566—7*-8
KATANGAE, HAPLOCHILUS 272
KAYSERI, DIPLOCERCIDES 477
Volume | ends at page 300
KEIENSIS, GOBIUS 385-6*
kelaartii, Mugil 97-8
KLEINII, CHAETODON 284
KNYSNAENSIS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22, 24,
35*, 36-8, 40 Pls. 10, 11
KNYSNAENSIS, PSAMMOGOBIUS 1934
KNYSNAENSIS, SERRANUS 167
KOWIENSIS, SCORPAENA 202-3
KUDA, (HIPPOCAMPUS) 150
kuhli, Mobula 569
KUMU, CHELIDONICHTHYS 68
K YPHOSIDAE 135-7, 247 305
KYPHOSUS 136-7
LABEO 218, 224
LABEO CAPENSIS 224 PI. 31
LABEO UMBRATUS 224, 225 PI. 31
LABIOSUS, MUGIL 129-30
LABRIDAE 289
LACTOPHRYS 210
LACTOPHRYS GIBBOSUS 209
LACTOPHRYS QUADRICORNIS 209 Pl. 22
Lactoria 210
LAGOCEPHALUS, TETRODON 207-8 PI.
20
LAJANG, DECAPTERUS 174-5 Pl. 21
LAMPADENA 17
LAMPANYCTUS 17
LANIARIUS, PTEROGYMNUS 311, 335,
336*—7 Pls. 19, 25; p. 526
LATICEPS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340,
341 Pls. 19, 26
LATIMERIA 422-6, 461, 471, 501
LATIMERIA CHALUMNAE 387-8*-390,
391-4 Pls. 3-7; pp. 403-S*—7*-8, 409-415
Pls. 1-3; pp. 425, 426-522 19 figs, 44 pis.
LATIPENNIS, CLINUS 297
LATOVITTATUS, MALACANTHUS 395
LATUS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 315
LAURENTII, CLINUS 196—8*, 297
laurentii, Petraites 196
LEPIDOTRIGLA 61, 64
LEPIDOTRIGLA FAUREI 62, 63-5 Pls. 16,
18, 19
LEPIDOTRIGLA MULTISPINOSUS 62,
66—7 Pls. 17, 20
LEPIDOTRIGLA NATALENSIS 62, 64, 65
Pls. 16, 18, 19
LEPTOCEPHALUS 227-8
LEPTOMETOPON 528
(LEPTOMETOPON) CRISTICEPS, POLY-
AMBLYODON 527*, 528—9*, 530*-2 Pl. 50
(LEPTOMETOPON) GIBBOSUS, POLY-
AMBLYODON 828, 531
LETHRINIDAE 533-535
licha, Dalatias 255
LICHA, SCYMNORHINUS 255
lichia, Scymnorhinus 255
LIMBATA, ACANTHOCEPOLA 172
LIMOSUS, ELEOTRIS 264-5 Pls. 4, 5
LINEATA, (TRIGLA) 73-6
LINEOLATUS, SCOMBEROMORUS 188-9
LINEOLATUS, (SYNCHIROPUS) 167
lineopunctatus, Dentex 374-6
liogaster, (Halieutea) 211-2
LIONURUS NASUTUS 154-5*
LIRUS 56
LITHOGNATHUS 311, 351-2, 354
LITHOGNATHUS LITHOGNATHUS 311,
350, 354, 355
LITHOGNATHUS, LITHOGNATHUS 311,
350, 354, 355
LITHOGNATHUS MORMYRUS 311, 355,
356* Pls. 20, 29
LITHOGNATHUS, PAGELLUS 182
LITHOPHILUS, NEOSCORPIS 7
Liza 79
longimanus, Mugil 96-8, 113
LOPHUS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1,
346-7, 551
lophus, Sparus 340
LOUTI, VARIOLA 542
LUTIANIDAE 173, 285, 396, 532-535
MACROLEPIS, MUGIL 89, 118-9*, 120, 131
Pl. 20
macrolepis, Mugil 115, 118
MACROPOMA 389, 425
MACROSOMA, (DECAPTERUS) 175
MADAGASCARIENSIS, ELEOTRIS 265
madagascariensis, Sparus 315
MALACANTHIDAE 395
MALACANTHUS LATOVITTATUS 395
MARCGRAVIA 59
MARCOSTOMUS, OPISTHOGNATHUS
(= MACROSTOMUS, O) 164 PI. 20
MARGINATA, (SYNAPTURA) 6
MARGINATUS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3,
27-29
marginatus, (Hemirhamphus) 24
MARGINATUS, OPHICHTHYS 151
marginatus, Ophiurus 151
MARLEYI, AMBLYAPISTUS 12
marleyi, Amblyapistus 543
MARLEYI, CHAETODON 176-7 PI. 22
MARLEYI, TAENIOLABRUS 256-8 Pls. 1, 2
MARLEYI, THYRSITOIDES 291-2
MATSUBARE, DENTEX 367
MEDITERRANEUS, (HOPLOSTETHUS)
162
MEDUSOPHAGUS, SCHEDOPHILUS 55-7
PI. 5
MELANURA, SARDINELLA 150-1
melinopterus, Mugil 125, 128
MENTALIS, CLINUS 197, 297
MERLUCCIUS CAPENSIS 158, 206
MESOPRION, (NEMIPTERUS) 401-2
MICRODON, DERMATOPSIS 568
microdon, Gymnocranius 536-7
MICRODON, PRISTIPOMOIDES 287
microlepis, Spondyliosoma 362
MICROPHIS BRACHYURUS 49*, 50
MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES 237
Micropus zeylonicus 13
MICRURA, (PTEROPLATEA) 43-4
miles, Dentex 370, 373
MOBULA DIABOLUS 561, 569
Mobula kuhli 569
MOBULIDAE 568
MOFFATI, HAPLOCHROMIS 230 Pl. 32
MONACANTHIDAE 206, 238-240
MONACANTHINAE 238
MONACANTHUS SETIFER 206-7 Pl. 19
MONACANTHUS, SYNCHIROPUS 165
MONOCEROS, ALUTERES 238, 240, 241-4
Pls. 40, 41, 42
Volume | ends at page 300
MONOCEROS UNICORNIS 51, 187
MONODACTYLIDAE 218, 235
MONODACTYLUS 235
MONODACTYLUS FALCIFORMIS 235
Pi. 34
MONOGRAMMA, SCOLOPSIS 51
MONOTAXIS 534-5, 542
MORMYRUS, LITHOGNATHUS 311, 355,
356* Pls. 20, 29
MOSSAMBICA, ANGUILLA 227
MUGIL 44, 77-83, 85*, 87*, (130), 231
Mugil auratus 80-1, 106, 108, 120, 122-3
Mugil belanak 129
Mugil borneensis 120
MUGIL BUCHANANI 81-2, 89, 113-4*-S,
131 Pls. 16, 20
MUGIL CAERULEOMACULATUS | 128,
130-1
Mugil caeruleomaculatus 95, 113, 115
MUGIL CANALICULATUS 81-2, 89, 113,
120-2*-3, 130, 132 Pls. 16, 17, 18
Mugil capensis 108, 110
MUGIL CAPITO 79, 83, 88, 102, 103—4*-5*-7,
110, 131 Pls. 17, 19
MUGIL CEPHALUS 79, 81, 83, 88, 90-1 *-S,
123, 130, 132 Pl. 15; p. 232*
Mugil ceylonensis 81, 113, 115
MUGIL COMPRESSUS 81, 89, 115—7*-8, 131
Pls. 17, 20
Mugil constantiae 90
MUGIL CRENILABIS 88, 99*, 100, 130,
274-5
MUGIL CUNNESIUS 129, 130
Muzgil cunnesius 81, 96, 98
Mugil diadema 81, 115, 117-8
Mugil engeli97-8 |
MUGIL EURONOTUS 81-4, 88, 100, 101 *-—3,
110, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 16, 17, 19; p. 232*, 233
Mugil hoefleri 122
Mugil kelaartii 97-8
MUGIL LABIOSUS 129, 130
Mugil longimanus 96-8, 113 .
MUGIL MACROLEPIS 89, 118-9*, 120, 131
Pl. 20
Mugil macrolepis 115, 118
Mugil melinopterus 125, 128
Mugil multilineatus 108, 110
Mugil nepalensis 128
Mugil oeur 90, 92
MUGIL OLIGOLEPIS 81, 89, 118, 125—7*-8,
131 Pls. 21, 22
Mugil olivaceus 120
Mugil parsia 129
Mugil planiceps 129
MUGIL ROBUSTUS 88-90, 93-4*-5, 115,
130-1 Pls. 21, 22
Mugil ruppellii 100
Mugil saliens 81, 100, 102, 106-8, 110
MUGIL SEHELI 89, 95, 111-2*-3, 123, 131
Pls. 16, 18
MUGIL SPEIGLERI 128-9-130
Mugil speigleri 81, 120, 122
MUGIL S TRONGYLOCEPHALUS 81, 83,
88, 93, 96—7*-8, 113, 130 Pls. 16, 18
MUGIL TADE 129, 130
MUGIL TRICUSPIDENS 81, 83-4, 88, 93,
108—9*—10, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 17, 18
Mugil troscheli 120
MUGIL WAIGIENSIS 89, 123-4*-S, 131
Pi. 20
MUGILIDAE 41, 77, 218, 231, 274
MUGILIDAE, Abbreviated key to 130
MULLOIDES, NEMIPTERUS 399, 400*-2
mulloides, Nemipterus 542
MULTIFASCIATUS, DICHISTIUS 138-9,
141, 144-6 Pls. 15, 16
multilineatus, Mugil 108, 110
MULTIRADIATUS, DERMATOPSIS 568
MULTISPINOSUS, LEPIDOTRIGLA 62,
66—7 Pls. 17, 20
MUS, CLINUS 11, 297
MYAPOSAE, HAPLOCHILUS 273
MYCTOPHIDAE 17, 152
MYCTOPHUM 17
MYCTOPHUM (DIAPHUS) ELUCENS
152-3*
MYCTOPHUM (NASOLYCHNUS) FLO-
RENTII 18 Pl. 9
MYLIOBATIDAE 147
MYLIOBATIS CERVUS 147-8*
Myxus 77-9, 81
Myxus barnardi 81, 90, 93
NASOLYCHNUS 18
(NASOLYCHNUS) FLORENTI, MYCTO-
PHUM 18 PI. 9
NASUTUS, CYMATOCEPS 311-2, 338-9*,
382 Pls. 20, 25; p. 512
NASUTUS, LIONURUS 154-5*
NASUTUS, PAGRUS 182-3 PI. 23
natalense, Acanthidium 272
natalensis, Chrysophrys 323, 547
NATALENSIS, CUBICEPS 200
natalensis, Dentex 374
NATALENSIS ISO 156-7
NATALENSIS, LEPIDOTRIGLA 62, 64, 65
Pls. 16, 18, 19
NATALENSIS, PAGELLUS 311, 352-3*4
Pis. 20, 29
natalensis, Polysteganus 376
NATALENSIS, PTEROPLATEA 43-45*, 47
Pl. 4
NATALENSIS, TILAPIA 229 Pl. 32
NAVALIS, NEMACOCLINUS 297-8
NEMACOCLINUS 298-9
NEMACOCLINUS NEVALIS 297-8
NEMIPTERIDAE 399, 533-535, 542
NEMIPTERUS 399
NEMIPTERUS DELAGOAE 542
NEMIPTERUS MULLOIDES 399, 400*-2,
542
NEOSCORPIS 6, 136, 137
NEOSCORPIS LITHOPHILUS 7
NEOTHUNNUS 187
NEOTHUNNUS ITOSIBI 185*
nepalensis, Mugil 128
NESIDES 421
NIERSTRASZI, (PERISTEDION) 71
nigra, Elacate 177
nigripinnatus, Chaetodon 282, 284
NIGROMARGINATUS, (OPISTHOGNA-
THUS) 165
NOCT, (DIPLODUS) 331
NUFAR, CHEIMERIUS 368, 370—1*-3 Pls.
21, 27
nufar, Dentex 370-1, 373
Volume | ends at page 300
nufar, Polysteganus 371
obliteratus, (Aluteres) 241
oeur, Mugil 90, 92
OLIGOLEPIS, MUGIL 81, 89, 118, 125—7*-8,
131 Pls. 21, 22
olivaceus, Mugil 120
ONCHOCEPHALIDAE 211
OPERCULARE, POMADASYS 179-182
OPERCULARIS, PTERAGOGUS 289, 290*
OPHICHTHYIDAE 151, 273
OPHICHTHYS MARGINATUS 151
OPHIOCEPHALUS, ELEOTRIS 265
Ophiurus marginatus 151
OPISTHODON, GRAMMONUS 82 PI. 4
OPISTHOGNATHIDAE 164
OPISTHOGNATHUS MARCOSTOMUS
(= MACROSTOMUS) 164 PI. 20
ORBICULARIS, (PLATAX) 249
orbis, Chaetodipterus 188, 250
ORBIS, TRIPTERODON 187-8, 245, 248-
250*—2 Pls. 21-23; p. 542-3
ORNATUS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297
Osbeckia 240
Osbeckia scriptus 243
OSTRACION 210
OSTRACIONTIDAE 209
Ostracion turritus 209
OXYLOPHIUS, TROPIDICHTHYS 15 Pl. 16
PACHYMETOPON 305, 311, 357, 362, 364,
526
PACHYMETOPON AENEUM 311, 363, 364
Pls. 22, 29; p. 526
PACHYMETOPON BLOCHII 311, 363, 364
Pls. 22, 28, 29
PACHYMETOPON CANESCENS 311, 363-4
PACHYMETOPON GIBBOSUM 526-7
PACHYMETOPON GLAUCUM 311, 363,
365, 366
PACHYMETOPON GRANDE 311, 363,
365-6, 526
Pachynathus conspicillum 210
PAGELLINAE 310-11, 350
PAGELLUS 304-5, 311, 351, 352, 354
PAGELLUS LITHOGNATHUS 182
PAGELLUS NATALENSIS 311, 352-3*-4
Pls. 20, 29
PAGRUS 183, 304—5, 317, 319, 349
PAGRUS CILIARIS 334
PAGRUS NASUTUS 182-3 Pl. 23
PALMIETENSIS, BROTULA 198 PI. 21
PALUDINOSUS, BARBUS 219, 221 Pl. 30
PAPYRICHTHYS 49, 53-4
PAPYRICHTHYS PELLUCIDUS 54-5 PI.
6A
PARAPERCIS PULCHELLA 276-7*-9
Parapercis robinsoni 279
PARASCORPIS 136
parmatus, (Setarches) 57-8
Parsia, Mugil 129
PAVO, CLINUS 11, 297
PEAOLOPESI, GLAUCOSOMA 396-7*
Pelecinomimus 159
Pelecinomimus picklei 158
PELLUCIDUS, PAPYRICHTHYS 54-5 P}. 6
pellucidus, Psenes 53-4
PENTAPODIDAE 534, 535, 342
PENTAPODUS 534-4, 541
PERISTEDION 61, 69
PERISTEDION ADENI 69, 71-3 Pl. 22
Peristedion gracile 69-7)
PERISTEDION WEBERI 69-71, 73 Pl. 21
PERONII, DENTEX 367
PETRAITES 299
Petraites 197
Petraites laurentii 196
PETROSCIRTES TAPEINOSOMA 51, 191-2
Pl. 21; p. 296
PETRUS 366-8, 380-1
PETRUS RUPESTRIS 368, 381, 382* Pls. 21,
27
PICKLEI, CETOMIMUS 158-9
picklei, Pelecinomimus 158
PINGUIPEDIDAE 276
PINNATUS, (PLATAX) 249
PISOODONOPHIS BORO 273
planiceps, Mugil 129
PLATACIDAE 187, 247, 248, 542
PLATACINAE 247, 248
PLATAX 137, 245-249, 252
PLATYCEPHALIDAE 204
PLATYCEPHALUS INDICUS 204-6 PI. 20
Platycephalus insidator 204
PLECTORHYNCHIDAE SO, 179, 287
PLOTOSIDAE 218, 226
PLOTOSUS ANGUILLARIS 226 PI. 34
POLYAMBLYODON 305, 311, 357, 362, 366,
526-8
POLYAMBLYODON GERMANUM #311,
366
(POLYAMBLYODON) GERMANUS,
POLYAMBLYODON 527, 528
POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTOMETOPON)
CRISTICEPS 527*, 528, 529*, 530*—2 Pl. 50
POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTOMETOPON)
GIBBOSUS 528, 531
POLYAMBLYODON (POLYAMBLYO-
DON) GERMANUS 527, 528
POLYPTERUS 501
POLYSTEGANUS 367-8, 371, 373-4, 378-380
POLYSTEGANUS ARGYROZONA 308%,
368, 374, 378
POLYSTEGANUS COERULEOPUNCTA-
TUS 368, 373, 374-6 Pls. 22, 28
Polysteganus natalensis 376
Polysteganus nufar 37}
POLYSTEGANUS PRAEORBITALIS 368,
374, 379, 380* Pls. 21, 28
POLYSTEGANUS UNDULOSUS 368, 374,
376-7* Pls. 21, 28; p. 556
POMADASYS OPERCULARE 179-182
Pomadasys striatus 288-9
POMADASYS STRIDENS 287-9
POMADASYS SUILLUM 181
POMATOMUS SALTATOR 186
PORCOSTOMA 311, 314, 348
PORCOSTOMA DENTATA 311, 349, 350
Pls. 20, 25
PRAEORBITALIS, POLYSTEGANUS 368,
374, 379, 380* Pls. 21, 28
PRIONOLEPIS 1
PRIONOLEPIS HEWITTI I, 3*
Prionolepis hewitti 187
PRIONOSPARUS 546, 548
PRISTIOPHORUS 253
Volume | ends at page 300
PRISTIPOMOIDES 287
PRISTIPOMOIDES
MICUS 285-6*-7
Pristipomoides filamentosus 287
PRISTIPOMOIDES MICRODON 287
PSAMMOGOBIUS 193
PSAMMOGOBIUS KNYSNAENSIS 193-4
PSENES 53, 200
PSENES INDICUS 53
Psenes pellucidus 53-4
PSENES WHITELEGGII 199, 200 Pi. 19
PSEUDALUTERES 240
PTERAGOGUS OPERCULARIS 289, 290*-—1
PTEROGYMNUS 310-11, 314, 335
PTEROGYMNUS LANIARIUS 311, 335,
336*-7 Pls. 19, 25; p. 526
PTEROPLATEA 43
PTEROPLATEA NATALENSIS 43-5*-7 PI.
4
PULCHELLA, PARAPERCIS 276—7*-9
PUNICEUS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1,
343-4*-5, 526, 551-2, $54—-5*-6
PUNTAZZO 305, 311, 313, 330
PUNTAZZO PUNTAZZO 311, 330
PUNTAZZO, PUNTAZZO 311, 330
ARGYROGRAM-
QUADRICORNIS, LACTOPHRYS 209 PI.
22 |
QUADRISPINOSUM, ACANTHIDIUM
270-1 *-2
QUEKETTI, CHELIDONICHTHYS 68*
regani, (Cetomimus) 158
REYNALDI, (HEMIRHAMPHUS) 31
RHABDODERMA 425
RHABDOSARGUS 321, 546
RHACHICENTRIDAE 177
RHACHICENTRUM CANADUS 177-8
Rhynchorhamphus 21-2
RIVERS-ANDERSONI, (PERISTEDION) 71
rivulatus, Déntex 533, 537, 541
rivulatus, Gymnocranius 533
ROBINSONI, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 317
robinsoni, Dentex 533, 537
ROBINSONI, GYMNOCRANIUS 368, 369
Pls. 21, 27
robinsoni, Gymnocranius 533, 536-7, 541
ROBINSONI, HOPLEGNATHUS 169-70 PI.
18
robinsoni, Parapercis 279
ROBUSTA, AXELIA 501, 505
ROBUSTUS, CLINUS 196, 297
ROBUSTUS, MUGIL 88-90, 93-4*-S, 115,
130-1 Pls. 21, 22
RUPPELLII, GYMNOCRANIUS 533, 537,
541
ruppellii, Mugil 100
rupestris, Dentex 371
RUPESTRIS, PETRUS 368, 381-2* Pls. 21, 27
Salarias 191
Salarias sexfasciatus 190-1 ©
saliens, Mugil 81, 100, 102, 106-8, 110
SALMO 236
SALMO FARIO FARIO 236, 237
SALMO FARIO IRIDEUS 236, 237
SALMOIDES, MICROPTERUS 237
SALMONIDAE 218, 236
SALPA, SARPA 311, 360
SALTATOR, POMATOMUS 186
SAMMARA, HOLOCENTRUM 275 PI. 11
SARBA, AUSTROSPARUS 311, 319, 320-
323—4*, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545-547-9
sarba, Austrosparus 325
sarba, Chrysophrys 547
SARBA, SPARUS 44, 141, 547
SARDA CHILENSIS 293, 294*—5
SARDA SARDA 295
SARDA, SARDA 295
SARDINELLA MELANURA 150-1 .
SARGUS, DIPLODUS 311, 320, 331-2* Pls.
19, 24
SARGUS HOLUBI 327
SARPA 305, 311, 357, 359
SARPA SALPA 311, 360
SASSENIA 425
SCANDENS, ANABAS 230
Scarostoma 170
SCATHARINAE 310-1, 357
SCHEDOPHILUS 54, 56
SCHEDOPHILUS MEDUSOPHAGUS 55-7
Pl. 5
SCHLEGELI, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22, 24,
35-39, 40
schlegeli, Hemirhamphus calabaricus 39 ;
SCLATERI, GEPHYROGLANIS 226 Pl. 33
SCOLOPSIS MONOGRAMMA 51
SCOLOPSIS VOSMERI 50
SCOMBEROMORUS LINEOLATUS 188-9
SCOMBRIDAE 185, 187-8, 293
SCORPAENA KOWIENSIS 202-3
SCORPAENIDAE 12, 57, 201-2, 543
SCORPIDIDAE 6, 135-7, 247
SCORPIS 6
SCRIPTUS, ALUTERES 240-1, 243-4 Pl. 42
scriptus, Osbeckia 243
SCULLYI, (BLENNIUS) 189
SCYLLIORHINICEPS, ECKLONIA-
ICHTHYS 561-2*-3
SCYMNORHINUS 253
SCYMNORHINUS BREVIPINNIS 253—-4*-5
SCYMNORHINUS LICHA 255
Scymnorhinus lichia 255
SCYMNORHINIDAE 253
SCYMNUS 253
SEHELI, MUGIL 89, 95, 111-2*-3, 123, 131
Pls. 16, 18
Semathunnus 187
SENTICEPS, BARBUS 219, 220*, 266*
SERRANIDAE 167, 542 '
SERRANUS KNYSNAENSIS 167
SETARCHES GUNTHERI or GUENTHERI
57-8 Pl. 6
SETIFER, CHAETODON 247
SETIFER, MONACANTHUS 206-7 Pl. 19
sexfasciatus, Salarias 190-1
SINUOSA, WIMANIA 500
SMITHII, (MICROPHIS) 50
smithii, (Mugil) 118
SOLEIDAE 4
SPARIDAE 135-7, 182, 303-308*-10, 337,
525-6, 532-534, 536, 545
SPARIFORMES 534
SPARINAE 3410-312-3
SPARODON 311, 313, 315, 327-8
Volume | ends at page 300
SPARODON DURBANENSIS 311, 321,
328-9*, 330 Pls. 18, 23
SPARRMANI, TILAPIA 229 PI. 32
SPARUS 183, 304-5, 313-321, 328-331, 334-5,
340, 349, 545
Sparus durbanensis 328
Sparus lophus 340
Sparus madagascariensis 315
SPARUS SARBA 44, 141
Sparus sarba 547
SPEIGLERI, MUGIL 128, 129-30
speigleri, Mugil 81, 120, 122
SPINIFER, ARGYROPS 311, 333, 334-5 Pls.
20, 25; p. 525
SPONDYLIOSOMA 305, 311, 357, 362-3
SPONDYLIOSOMA EMARGINATUM 311,
362 Pls. 22, 29
Spondyliosoma microlepis 362
SQUALIDAE 253, 270
STELLATUS, (TETRODON) 208
STENOGOBIUS 263
STRIATUS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297
striatus, Pomadasys 288-9
STRIDENS, POMADASYS 287-9
STROMATEIDAE 49, 53, 199
STRONGYLOCEPHALUS, MUGIL 81, 83,
88, 93, 96-7*-8, 113, 130 Pls. 16, 18
SUILLUM, POMADASYS 181
SUPERCILIOSUS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297
SYNAGRIS 399
SYNANCEIA 543
SYNANCEIA HORRIDA 543-4
SYNANCEIA VERRUCOSA 543-4
SYNANCIIDAE 13, 543
SYNAPTURA BARNARD] 4, 5* Pl. 16
SYNCHIROPUS MONACANTHUS 165
SYNGNATHIDAE 49, 149
TADE, MUGIL 129-30
TAENIOIDES 564
TAENIOIDES JACKSONI 564—5*—6
TAENIOLABRUS 256
TAENIOLABRUS MARLEYI 256*-8 Pls.
1,2
TAENIONOTUS, (AMBLYAPISTUS) 13
Taius 367, 373
TAPEINOSOMA, PETROSCIRTES 51, 191-2
Pl. 21; p. 296
TAURUS, CLINUS 196, 297
teira, (Platax) 249
TELEOSTEI 215-217*
TESTUDINEUS, ANABAS 230
TETRODON LAGOCEPHALUS 207-8 Pl]. 22
TETRODONTIDAE 15, 207
TEUTHIDIDAE 187
Tholichthys 284
THYRSITOIDES MARLEYI 291-2
TILAPIA 228-9, 230
TILAPIA NATALENSIS 229 Pl. 32
TILAPIA SPARRMANI 229 Pj. 32
TOBYEI, (MYLIOBATIS) 147
TORVUS, CONGIOPODUS 51
TRACHELOCHISMUS 561
TRACHICHTHYIDAE 160
TREVELYANI, BARBUS 219 Pl. 29
TRICHONOTIDAE 256
TRICUSPIDENS, AUSTROSPARUS 546,
548-9
TRICUSPIDENS, MUGIL 81, 83-4, 88, 93,
108-9*-10, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 17, 18
TRIFASCIATUS, CHAETODON 280-1
TRIFASCIATUS, DIPLODUS 311, 331,
332-3* Pls. 19, 24
trifascigula, Blennius 295
TRIGLA 61, 73-4
TRIGLA (TRIGLA) 73
(TRIGLA), TRIGLA 73
TRIGLA (TRIGLOPORUS) 61, 73-4
TRIGLA (TRIGLOPORUS) AFRICANA 75,
74-6 Pl. 23
TRIGLIDAE 61
TRIGLOPORUS 61, 734
(TRIGLOPORUS) AFRICANA, TRIGLA
73, 74-6 Pl. 23
(TRIGLOPORUS), TRIGLA 61, 734
TRIPTERODON 137, 245-249, 304
TRIPTERODON ORBIS 187-8, 245, 248-
250*-2 Pls. 21-23; pp. 542-3
TROPIDICHTHYS OXYLOPHIUS 15 Pl. 16
troscheli, Mugil 120
turritus, Ostracion 209
UMBRATUS, LABEO, 224, 225 Pl. 31
UNDULOSUS, POLYSTEGANUS 368, 374,
376—7* Pls. 21, 28; p. 556
UNICORNIS, MONOCEROS 51, 187
unifasciatus, (Hemirhamphus) 33, 36, 38, 40
VAGUS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 314
VAILLANTII, (PTEROPLATEA) 46
VALENCIENNI, (PTEROPLATEA) 46
variabilis, Dentex 37}
VARIOLA LOUTI 542
VENUSTRIS, CLINUS 196, 297
VERRUCOSA, SYNANCEIA 543-4
vespertilio, (Platax) 249
VESPOSUS 1
vicinus, Anabas 231
VONBONDEI, GOBIUS 259-261 * Pls. 3, 5
VOSMERI, SCOLOPSIS 50 PI. 5
VULPES, ALBULA 51
VULNERATUS, BARBUS 219, 223 Pl. 31
WAIGIENSIS, MUGIL 89, 123-4*-5, 131 PI.
20
WEBERI, PERISTEDION 69-71, 73 Pl. 21
WHITEIA 425
WHITELEGGII, PSENES 199, 200 Pl. 19
WIMANIA 425, 447
WIMANIA SINUOSA 500
XANTHOCEPHALUS,
282-3 *
XENOLEPIDICHTHYS 1
XENOLEPIDICHTHYS DALGLEISHI
162-3 Pl. 18
CHAETODON
ZEBRATUS, GALAXIAS 236 Pl. 34
zeylonicus, Amphiprionichthys 13
ZEYLONICUS, CARACANTHUS 13
zeylonicus, Micropus 13
Agulhas Cape, 13
Algoa Bay, 20
Amanzimtoti, 37
Bashee, 29
Bazaruto Island, 51
Beira, 52
Bredasdorp Coast, 14
Buffalo River, 26
Bushmans River, 22
Camps Bay, 8
The Cape, 9
Cape Agulhas, 13
Cape of Good Hope, 9
Cape Padrone, 21
Cape Point, 9
Cape Town, 7
Chalumna River, 25
Dassen Island, 6
Delagoa Bay, 49
Durban, 39
East London, 26
False Bay, 12
Fish Point, 24
Great Fish Point, 24
Great Kei River, 27
Inhaca, 47
Inhambane, 50
Isipingo, 38
Kalk Bay, 10
Kei Mouth, 27
Kei River, 27
Knysna, 17
Kowie River, 23
Kosi Bay, 45
—
OONOahWHh
Swakopmund
Walfish Bay
Port Nolloth
Lamberts Bay
St. Helena Bay
Saldanha Bay
Dassen Island
Cape Town
Camps Bay
The Cape
Cape of Good Hope
Cape Point
Kalk Bay
Simons Bay
False Bay
Cape Agulhas
Bredasdorp Coast
St. Sebastian Bay
Mossel Bay
Knysna
Plettenberg Bay
Tsitsikama
Algoa Bay
Port Elizabeth
Cape Padrone
Bushmans River
Kowie River
Port Alfred
Great Fish Point
Chalumna River
Buffalo River
East London
SOUTHERN AFRICAN
Kei Mouth
Great Kei River
Transkei
Bashee
Xora River
Umtata River
Umgazi River
Port St. Johns
Pondoland
Port Shepstone
Umkomaas River
Amanzimtoti
Isipingo
Durban
Umgeni River
Umhlanga
Tugela River
Zululand
Richards Bay
St. Lucia Bay
Kosi Bay
Maputoland 49)
Inhaca cceencee
L
Ponte Mahone M
Ponte Maone
Delagoa Bay
Lourenco Marques
Polana
Inhambane
Bazaruto Island
Beira
Zambezi River
ALOR I, ACO R yy, — iglEteaey.. OOO Gy,
Lamberts Bay, 3
Lourenco Marques, 49
Maputoland, 46
Mossel Bay, 16
Plettenberg Bay, 18
Polana, 49
Pondoland, 34
Ponte Mahone, 48
Ponte Maone, 48
Port Alfred, 23
Port Elizabeth, 20
Port Nolloth, 2
Port Shepstone, 35
Port St. Johns, 33
Richards Bay, 43
St. Helena Bay, 4
St. Lucia Bay, 44
St. Sebastian Bay, 15
Saldanha Bay, 5
Simons Bay, 11
Swakopmund, 1
Transkei, 28
Tugela River, 41
Tsitsikama, 19
Umgazi River, 32
Umgeni River, 39
Umhlanga, 40
Umkomaas River, 36
Umtata River, 31
Walfish Bay, 1
Xora River, 30.
Zambezi River, 53
Zululand, 42