esp, Agulhas Cape, 13 Algoa Bay, 20 Amanzimtoti, 37 Bashee, 29 Bazaruto Island, 51 Beira, 52 Bredasdorp Coast, 14 Buffalo River, 26 Bushmans River, 22 Camps Bay, 8 The Cape, 9 Cape Agulhas, 13 Cape of Good Hope, 9 Cape Padrone, 21 Cape Point, 9 Cape Town, 7 Chalumna River, 25 Dassen Island, 6 Delagoa Bay, 49 Durban, 39 East London, 26 False Bay, 12 Fish Point, 24 Great Fish Point, 24 Great Kei River, 27 Inhaca, 47 Inhambane, 50 Isipingo, 38 Kalk Bay, 10 Kei Mouth, 27 Kei River, 27 Knysna, 17 Kowie River, 23 Kosi Bay, 45 — OONOahWHh Swakopmund Walfish Bay Port Nolloth Lamberts Bay St. Helena Bay Saldanha Bay Dassen Island Cape Town Camps Bay The Cape Cape of Good Hope Cape Point Kalk Bay Simons Bay False Bay Cape Agulhas Bredasdorp Coast St. Sebastian Bay Mossel Bay Knysna Plettenberg Bay Tsitsikama Algoa Bay Port Elizabeth Cape Padrone Bushmans River Kowie River Port Alfred Great Fish Point Chalumna River Buffalo River East London SOUTHERN AFRICAN Kei Mouth Great Kei River Transkei Bashee Xora River Umtata River Umgazi River Port St. Johns Pondoland Port Shepstone Umkomaas River Amanzimtoti Isipingo Durban Umgeni River Umhlanga Tugela River Zululand Richards Bay St. Lucia Bay Kosi Bay Maputoland 49) Inhaca cceencee L Ponte Mahone M Ponte Maone Delagoa Bay Lourenco Marques Polana Inhambane Bazaruto Island Beira Zambezi River ALOR I, ACO R yy, — iglEteaey.. OOO Gy, Lamberts Bay, 3 Lourenco Marques, 49 Maputoland, 46 Mossel Bay, 16 Plettenberg Bay, 18 Polana, 49 Pondoland, 34 Ponte Mahone, 48 Ponte Maone, 48 Port Alfred, 23 Port Elizabeth, 20 Port Nolloth, 2 Port Shepstone, 35 Port St. Johns, 33 Richards Bay, 43 St. Helena Bay, 4 St. Lucia Bay, 44 St. Sebastian Bay, 15 Saldanha Bay, 5 Simons Bay, 11 Swakopmund, 1 Transkei, 28 Tugela River, 41 Tsitsikama, 19 Umgazi River, 32 Umgeni River, 39 Umhlanga, 40 Umkomaas River, 36 Umtata River, 31 Walfish Bay, 1 Xora River, 30. Zambezi River, 53 Zululand, 42 J. L. B. SMITH ICHTHYOLOGICAL PAPERS 1931—1943 J. LL.B. SMITH ICHTHYOLOGICAL PAPERS 1931—1943 Vol. 1 Edited by Margaret M. Smith PUBLISHED BY THE J. L. B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY RHODES UNIVERSITY . GRAHAMSTOWN 1969 Printed by Cape & Transvaal Printers Ltd., Cape Town. VOLUME 1 Contents PAGE New and little known fish from the south and east coasts of Africa. Rec. Albany Mus. ] 4 (1): 145-160 Pl. 16. January 1931 An interesting new myctophid fish from South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 21 (2): 17 125-127 Pl. 9. April 1933 The South African species of the genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 21 21 (2): 129-150 Pls. 10-12. April 1933 The growth changes of Pteroplatea natalensis, G and T. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 22 43 (1): 83-87 Pl. 4. August 1934 Marine fishes of seven genera new to South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 22 (1): 49 89-100 Pls. 5-6. August 1934 The Triglidae of South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 22 (4): 321-336 Pls. 16-23. 61 December 1934 ' The fishes of the family Mugilidae in South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 30 (5): 587-644 77 Pls. 15-22. February 1935 The “‘galjoen”’ fishes of South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 23 (3): 265-276 Pls. 135 13-17. September 1935 New and little known fishes from South Africa. Rec. Albany Mus. 4 (2): 169-235 147 Pls. 18-23. Mav 1935 Fresh-water fishes of eastern Cape Province in A guide to the vertebrate fauna of the 215 eastern Cape Province South Africa. Part II Reptiles, Amphibians, and Freshwater Fishes: 119-141 Pls. 29-34. 1937. Albany Museum, Grahamstown The South African species of the family Aluteridae. Rec. Albany Mus. 4 (2): 358-364 238 Pls. 40-42. May 1935 PAGE The genus Tripterodon Playfair. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 23 (4): 303-310 Pls. 21-23. 245 February 1936 Two interesting new fishes from South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 24 (1): 1-6 253 Pls. 1-2. June 1936 New gobioid and cyprinid fishes from South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 24 (1): 259 47-55 Pls. 3-5. June 1936 New records of South African fishes. Ann. Natal Mus. 8 (2): 167-197 Pl. 11. May 269 1937 Acknowledgements I wish to express my appreciation: for the permission granted by the following to reproduce the papers in this volume: 1. The Director, Albany Museum, Grahamstown; 2. The Editor, Royal Society of South Africa, Cape Town; 3. The Acting Director, Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg; 4. The Editor, Nature, London; to Miss M. Igglesden for many hours of work compiling the index; to the staff of the Department of Ichthyology for their encouragement and assistance. Margaret M. Smith, Grahamstown. June, 1968. JAMES LEONARD BRIERLEY SMITH was born in Graaff-Reinet, Cape Colony, on September 26, 1897, and died in Grahamstown on January 8, 1968. His love of fishes dated back to when, as a small boy at Knysna, he caught his first small silvery fish (Diplodus sargus). From then on angling and fishes became a passion that lasted until the end of his life. After an outstanding career in Chemistry, when by means of bursaries and scholarships, he put himself through Stellenbosch and Cambridge Universities, he returned in 1923 to lecture at Rhodes University College in Grahamstown. He was a brilliant, inspiring and much loved lecturer and teacher, and an indefatigable research worker. As such he came up against the “Old Guard” who had graduated to Chairs in the College from being school teachers, and looked askance at scientific research work. The turning point of his’ life probably came when he refused to spend his own precious time washing up students’ apparatus at the end of the year but offered to pay an unskilled person to do his share! When the Chair of Chemistry fell vacant, he was passed over. The only two members of the Senate who had doctorates, Professor S. Schonland, head of the Botany Depart- ment, and Professor J. E. Duerden, head of the Zoology Department, both fought bitterly to have Smith appointed to the Chair, but they were overruled, the excuse being that Organic Chemistry was a static subject of the past with no future! A Physical Chemist was appointed. Thus Chemistry’s loss proved ultimately to be Ichthyology’s gain. Time he would have spent on administration was given to research in Chemistry during official (and some unofficial) hours, and in Ichthyology during his spare time. He published his first short ichthyological paper in the Records of the Albany Museum in 1931, illustrating it himself with what he considered reasonable sketches. H. W. Parker, the herpetologist at the British Museum who was a student with him at Cambridge, wrote saying he was surprised to see a chemist publishing a paper on fishes. The text was quite good but the illustrations were terrible! For the next ichthyological paper he produced, he spent many arduous hours over the illustration which he redrew a number of times. The result (Myctophum (Nasolvchnus) florentii) was certainly worth all the trouble. He continued to illustrate his own papers until 1941. From 1943 with the Early Juvenile Stadia his wife, Margaret Mary, began illustrating his publications. Little did she realise where that was to lead her! | These two volumes represent the first phase of his ichthyological researches. During the war (1939-45) most of his time had of necessity to be given to teaching Chemistry, and at this period he published three Chemistry text-books. In September 1945 he was invited to produce a book on South African fishes. He had arrived at the parting of the ways. The newly formed South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research made it possible for him to devote all his time to Ichthyology. He was given a grant of £800 p.a. to be renewed annually. It carried neither pension nor other benefits, and he lost his government pension due to him after 25 years of teaching because he refused to state that he was retiring from teaching on medical grounds. But to the end the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research which had taken over the old ‘‘Research Grant Board” that had assisted him with these early papers, supported his work in every way. In 1946 The Department of Ichthyology was founded and built up round his work. From 1946-1949 while busy writing The Sea Fishes of Southern Africa, he published seven more ichthyological papers in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London. These have not been included here as they are regarded as belonging to the second phase of his ichthyological work. Although A neutral solution of formaldehyde for biological purposes was published in 1947, it was read in 1944 and has been reprinted at the end. In two big monographs in volume 2, viz. The South African fishes of the families Sparidae and Denticidae and A living coelacanthid fish from South Africa, Smith’s personal copies have been used for reprinting and his own corrections have been reproduced. In the rest of the papers minor typographical errors have been corrected. 1 Records of the Albany Museum. Vol. IV. No. 1. pp. 145—160. Pl. XVI. January, 1931. New and little known fish from the south and east coasts of Africa. By J. L. B. SMITH, M.Sc., Ph.D. (With Plate XVI.) FAMILY GRAM MICOLEPIDAE. Prionolepis n.g. Body ovate, deep, very compressed. Anterior ridges on head and body strongly serrate. Scales small, embedded at right angles to the skin, with serrulate recurved upper edge. Whole of head and body scaly. Spinous and soft portions of dorsal and anal united; spines of dovsal, anal and ventrals stout, with serrated ridges. No spines on body at base of median fins, but alternate scales at base of dorsal and anal enlarged. Ventrals thoracic, reduced to a pair of spines and a few rudimentary rays. Mouth small, terminal horizontal. Gills 4, a slit behind the 4th. Gill membranes united to the isthmus. Gill rakers moderate, slender. Branchiostegals few, reduced. Pseudobranchiae absent. Lateral line obscure. Nostrils paired. This genus appears to be intermediate between Xenolepi- dichthys Gilchrist and Vesposus Jordan or somewhat closer to the latter, but is sharply distinguished from the other genera of the family by the character of the scales. This singular family now contains four monotypic genera, two of which are South African. Prionolepis hewitti n. sp. Body ovate, deep, very compressed. Dorsal profile elevated. Depth 13, length of head 3 in length of body. Maximum width of body at shoulder, 10 in length of body. Eye 2 in length of head, slightly greater than snout, twice interorbital width. Mouth small, terminal horizontal. Maxilla non-protractile, extends to almost below anterior nostril. A single series of small vertically implanted incisors in each jaw. Small teeth in bands on vomer. Dentigerous pharyngeals present. Nostrils paired, circular, close 146 Smith—New South African Fish. together in a pentagonal depression before the orbit, edges of this depression serrate. Pre- and supra-orbital ridges serrate. 2 serrated ridges from snout to base of spinous dorsal; similar ridges from the chin to the ventrals. 2 small ridges on snout, each with 3 very small recurved spines. Gills 4, a slit behind the 4th. Gill rakers moderate slender, about 13 on lower limb of anterior arch. Gill opening normal, membranes joined to the isthmus. Branchiostegals 3 much reduced. Pseudobranchiae absent. The scales are small, embedded at right angles to the skin, and have a denticulate recurved upper edge. The whole of the head and body is scaly. Lateral series 91., lateral tr. 14:18 longitudinal series on cheek: lateral line tubules about 35. Lateral line gently curved, very obscure on posterior half of body. Alternate scales at bases of dorsal and anal much enlarged and sharply ridged. D V 29. Commences above hind margin of opercle. 1st spine longest slightly less than head, has 2 anterior and on each side two ridges, each with recurved spinelets. The remaining spines decrease in length to the 5th which is about half the length of the first. The 2nd—5th spines have on each side a ridge of recurved spinelets. The soft rays which are simple, uniform and somewhat shorter than the 5th dorsal spine, have on each side a row of recurved raylets. i A II 28. Commences below the 3rd dorsal spine. lst spine half the length of, and similar in structure to, the first dorsal spine. 2nd spine subequal and similar to the 5th dorsal spine. Rays slightly shorter than, but exactly similar to the soft dorsal rays. P 17, length of head, rays simple, base immediately below hind margin of opercle. V I (2 or 3), thoracic, rays rudimentary. Spines similar to and slightly shorter than the first anal spine. Caudal truncate, rays 26, similar in structure to dorsal and anal rays, each having a lateral row of recurved raylets on each side. Peduncle tapering posteriorly, subequal to eye. Prionolepis hewilti n. sp. X 2}. Below : scaling of right side, x about 7, 148 Smith.—New South African Fish. Colour. Light yellowish; abdominal area and operculum dull silvery. A black blotch above the orbit, tapering to a point at the base of the spinous dorsal. A narrow black bar across the posterior part of the caudal peduncle. A black transverse band across the posterior third of the body, about half the depth at this point, and about one third wide as long. A narrow black irregular band below the posterior ? of soft dorsal and anal, following the dorsal and anal profiles. A few isolated angular dark spots on the body. Fins light yellow. Sex and condition cannot be determined without dissection, although the specimen is almost certainly juvenile. A single specimen, 40 mm. in length,* cast up during a storm at Great Fish Point. Type and only known specimen in the Albany Museum. *In all these descriptions, length of body excludes the caudal fin. FAMILY SOLEIDAE. Synaptura barnardi n.sp. (PI. XVI.) Dextral. Body lanceolate. Depth 23, length of head 4} in length of body. Eye 7 in head, 1? in snout, about twice inter- orbital width. Upper eye in advance of lower slightly more than half eye diameter. Lower and anterior border of lower eye with a filamentous fringe. Snout blunt, rounded, scarcely hooked. Cleft of mouth extends to below the centre of the lower eye: posterior margins of lips on coloured side fringed. Teeth very minute on jaws on blind side only. Anterior right nostril tubular: posterior with a fringed flap. Anterior left nostril surrounded by a fringed flap, developed behind covering a naked groove. Preopercle hidden below the skin. Opercular margin strongly fringed on blind side: lightly fringed on upper margin on coloured side. Opercular membrane joined to the upper margin of the base of the pectoral on the blind side. On the coloured side, the membrane is joined to the body well below the base of the pectoral and forms an extraneous fold which extends upwards obscuring more than half of the base of the pectoral, Smith—New South African Fish. 149 D. 78. Commences on the snout in front of the lower margin of the upper eye: rays articulated, membrane slightly incised. Anterior rays short, graduated: middle anterior rays 33, posterior rays 4 in length of head. On the blind side, all the rays have a membranous fringe joined to the body at the base of the fin: fringe more pronounced anteriorly. Fin joined to the caudal. A. 57. Rays similar to the dorsal rays. Pectorals small but well developed: right pectoral 8 in length of head, left pectoral very slightly longer, about 7 in head. Scales small, strongly ctenoid on coloured side, a few on the head and along the lateral line bearing short filamentous process. 11 about 110. Scales on the blind side rounded or very feebly ctenoid. Lateral line very gently curved, almost straight, extend- ing to above the preopercle on the right side. On the blind side, the lateral line is similar as far as the head, where it bifurcates, one branch turning down to near the corner of the mouth, the upper branch, at 180° to the lower, extending slightly obliquely back to near the base of the dorsal and then curving sharply forwards. Right side. Blind side. Scales of Synaptura barnardt n.sp. Caudal lanceolate, slightly rounded, 2 in length of head. Colour. On the right side the ground colour is light grey. Some very small isolated brownish spots on the head and body. Irregular very small white spots chiefly along the lateral line and on the anterior upper part of head and body. Median fins slightly darker at base, outer margins lighter: regular series of 150 Smith—New South African Fish. light and of dark dots on the base of dorsal and anal. Caudal with close set dark spots, margin lighter, end brownish. Right pectoral light with reddish margin. Ventrals light. A single specimen 86 mm. in length from Great Fish Point, in very shallow water. Type in the Albany Museum. This species is very close to marginata Boulenger, but differs in the very small pectorals and in the presence of the curious fold in the opercular membrane on the right. side. It is noteworthy that many species of “Soles” are abundant in shallow water on the coast about Great Fish Point. The reefs of rock are very low at this point extending with very little fall some hundred yards below low water mark. Sand accumulates between the rocks, and fair numbers of “Soles,” up to a length of 500 mm., are obtained by wading out from knee to thigh deep in the water at low tide, and stabbing these patches of sand with a “spear,” resembling a pitchfork. The specimen described was secured in this manner. FAMILY SCORPIDIDAE. Neoscorpis n.g. Body oblong-ovate. Mouth small, terminal. The outer series of teeth in the jaws more or less enlarged and lanceolate. An upper and lower pair of dentigerous pharyngeals well developed. Minute teeth in bands on vomer and palatines, maxilla expanded posteriorly. Gill rakers moderate. Dorsal spines 6-8, in a deep groove, increasing in length posteriorly: soft portion longer than spinous, anterior rays subfalcate forming a prominent lobe. Anal spines graduated, soft rays similar to those of the dorsal. Anal dorsal and caudal scaly. Differs from Scorpis C. and V. in the absence of serrations on the preopercle, in the absence of lingual teeth, and in the smaller number of dorsal spines. A South African genus with one species, now recorded from Knysna to the Natal coast. Smith—New South African Fish. 151 Neoscorpis lithophilus G. and T. Stone-fish (Natal), Butter-fish (Eastern Province). 1908 Gilchrist and Thompson. Ann. 8. Afr. Mus. vol I, p. 162. 1917 ibid. Ann. Durb. Mus. vol. I, pt. 4, p. 365. 1925 Barnard. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. vol. XXI, p. 663, pl. XXVIII, fig. I. Depth 23 (Juv.) —2 (Ad.), length of head 34 (Juv.) —434 (Ad.) in length of body. Eye 3—4 in length of head, in Juv. less than, in Ad. equal to snout; 1 (Juv.) —12 (Ad.) in interorbital width. Snout obtuse, interorbital prominent. Maxilla extends to below anterior border of eye. Teeth in bands in both jaws, outer row enlarged, lanceolate. Whole of head except interorbital space, - gnout and chin, scaly. Soft dorsal, soft anal and caudal scaly. Very fine naked groove at base of soft dorsal. Gill rakers 12-13 on lower limb of anterior arch. Pyloric caeca very numerous and long. Sealy process in axil of ventrals ill defined in young exam- ples D VI—VIII, 20—22. Spines short and stout, increasing in size posteriorly. Anterior rays, almost length of head, subfalcate forming a prominent lobe. A III 23—26. Spines short and stout, graduated. 1st spine 3 and 8rd spine 1 in eye diameter. Anterior soft rays equal and similar to dorsal rays. Lateral line almost straight. Scales II 90—97, |. tr. we Colour. Silvery grey. In young often 7—8 faint dark cross bars equal to the interspaces. Interorbital darker with a broad light grey space on dorsal area. Ventrals light, remaining fins dark grey. Soft dorsal, soft anal and caudal with a black mar- ginal band about one-sixth of eye diameter. Membrane of dorsal spines black. Iris yellow. A semi-circular black mark on the hinder margin of the operculum. Locality. Knysna, Port Alfred, Great Fish Point, Isipingo, Natal coast. Distribution. South and south-east coasts of Africa. I have been fortunate in securing a well graduated series of specimens ranging in length from 44 to 468 mm. The number of dorsal spines appears to be commonly six, rarely seven or eight. 152 Smith.—New South African Fish. This species is fairly common among rocks in shallow water; very young specimens appear to be most plentiful during the middle summer months. On the coast south of Natal, it is a somewhat rare capture on lines, but is frequently secured by net and spear at night with the aid of a light. It is esteemed as a food fish, the flesh being of fine texture and of excellent flavour. In April 1929, after a flood in the Great Fish River had caused considerable pollution of the sea for some miles west of the mouth, a number of specimens of this species was taken by hand in the shallow surf near the mouth of the river by a party of anglers. The specimens were alive but evidently suffering from partial suffocation induced by the amount of fine particles of clay in suspension in the sea water. At these times, the sea is coloured from red to deep brown, and relatively large numbers of immature fish of various species are cast up dead by the waves, while the larger specimens appear to desert temporarily the normal angling spots. FAMILY BLENNIIDAE. Blennius fascigula Barnard. (Pl. XVI.) ‘Rocky’ (Eastern coasts). 1925. Barnard. Ann. S.A. Museum, vol. XXI, p. 834. Depth 4—43, length of head 33—4 in length of body. Eye 3$—4 in length of head, slightly greater than interorbital width, slightly less than snout. Profile of head very abruptly descending. Maxilla extends to below anterior third of the eye. Canines in both jaws, those in the lower jaw slightly larger: canines visible in even very small specimens. No occipital filaments. Nasal tentacles short, fimbriate. Supraorbital tentacles with a short flattened stalk, widening above and bearing 5—6 filaments, total length equal to the eye. Interorbital concave, groove extending to the snout.. A shallow transverse groove behind the orbits: another very shallow transverse groove before the base of the dorsal. Gill membranes united forming a fold across the throat. LL. anteriorly a double row of pores. Smith—New South African Fish. 153 D. XII. 19—22, commences above the hinder margin of the preopercle, very slightly notched between the spinous and soft portions. Dorsal not joined to the caudal. A. II. 20-—-22. The two spines in the male enveloped in thick spongy skin. 1st spine obscure in females. Caudal rounded. Colour. Ground colour yellowish, 7 (Type 5) vertical cross bars about equal to the interspaces from the middle of the side extending on to the base of the dorsal. A variable longitudinal series of dark spots in pairs below the bars. Irregular dark spots on the lower part of the body. Small dark spots on the head, on the dorsal and on the base of the pectoral. Anal dark with projecting ends of the rays light. A dark tapering spot at the base of each alternate anal ray in some cases. Caudal light immaculate. A dark bar across the chin. Two dark bars across the throat; the hinder bar sometimes bifurcates on the side, and in some specimens a faint cross bar shows across the base of the ventrals. Usually a dark spot between the first and second dorsal spines. Length up to 85 mm. Locality. Cove Rock, East London. The species is founded upon a not too well preserved juvenile specimen from an unknown locality, and the original description is therefore necessarily somewhat inadequate. Neither the type nor my specimens show three clear cross bars across the throat, besides the one on the chin. A number of specimens from this locality which agree generally with this amended diagnosis of the species, show no sign of bifurcation of the hinder band on the throat, while in some cases the two bands have almost run into one large blotch. Pending the collection of further material these specimens are at present assigned to this species. The specimen figured is one in which the hinder band does not bifurcate. It may be remarked that specimens collected recently on the south-eastern coasts of Africa indicate that a revision of the African species of this genus is desirable, since certain diag- nostic features employed for the delimitation of species appear to be somewhat inconstant, and would, if maintained with 154 Smith.—New South African Fish. material recently collected, involve an unnecessary multiplication of species. Further material is at present being collected with a view to such revision. FAMILY CLINIDAE. Clinus agilis n. sp. (Pl. XVI.) ‘Klip-fish’ (South-west). ‘Rocky’ (Eastern coasts). Body moderately elongate, compressed. Dorsal profile gently curved from snout to base of anterior dorsal spines, with a slight hump above the hind margin of the preopercle. Depth 4—5 length of head 34—4 in length of body. Eye 3—4 in head, 13 times snout, almost twice interorbital width. Snout moderately sharp, sub-conical: very slight inter- orbital prominence. A slight groove from snout to interorbital. Two very shallow v-shaped grooves on occiput. Mucous pores on head prominent. Cleft of mouth oblique: jaws sub-equal: maxilla extends to below anterior third or centre of eye. A broad band of small teeth in both jaws, outer row enlarged: a curved band on vomer. A tentacle over the eye consisting of a flattish stalk with 2—38 cirri at end: length varies from 2—3 in eye. Minute nasal tentacles. D XXXIV—XXXV, 3—4. Commences above hind margin of preopercle. 1st, 3rd and 4th spines are shortest, subequal, 4—2 of eye: 2nd spine 14—-14 times Ist. First three spines widely spaced, membrane deeply notched between 3rd and 4th spines. Remaining spines gradually increase in length, the last spine being 2—2i times the first. Membrane scarcely incised. An- terior ray slightly longer than last spine: remaining rays gradu- ated, last ray % of first in length, membrane joined to peduncle at base of caudal. A II, 21—24. 1st spine 3 of eye, 2nd spine 14 times as long as the first. Rays graduated, first ray 3, last ray 2 in length of head, ends project somewhat beyond membrane. P, 12, slightly less than head. V. I. 2-38, Inner (8rd) ray very small when present. 11 Smith—New South African Fish. 155 Caudal rounded, of length of head. Peduncle slender, twice as long as deep. Colour (alive). Mottled grey-green. Seven irregular darker cross bands extending in some cases obliquely on to the base of the dorsal. Narrow dark band at base of caudal. Dark patch on nape. Head spotted. Dark spots on anal, pectoral and caudal, fewer on dorsal. Occasionally irregular reddish blotches on dorsal (males). Reddish tinge on posterior margin of opercle. Some- times a black spot on membrane between Ist and 2nd dorsal spines. Locality. Knysna estuary. The types are seven specimens in the Albany Museum collection ranging in length from 55 to 65 mm. At Knysna this active and shy little fish lives in the sea- grass on the mud-banks of the river and is captured with difficulty. The species is very close to acuminatus C. and V., but differs chiefly in the dorsal fin formula and in the characters of the anterior portion of the spinous dorsal. Since our diagnosis of the species acuminatus is based largely on specimens collected from the Cape Peninsula, described by Gilchrist and Thompson (Ann. S.A. Mus. 1908, vol. VI, pt. 2, p. 124), it is possible that with collection over wider limits, the present species agilis may be shown to be a variety or sub-species of acuminatus. It may be noted here that I have found many species of Clinus hitherto recorded only from about the Cape Peninsula, occurring regularly along the coast as far east as East London: of these, cottoides C. and V., dorsalis Blkr, and superciliosus Linn. appear to be the most plentiful, while brachycephalus C. and V., and capensis C. and V. are fairly common, being especially plentiful in the rock-pools at and near East London: anguillaris C. and V., striatus G. and T., mus G. and T., pavo G. and T., brevicristatus G. and T., fucoruwm G. and T. and ornatus G. and T. have also been found, 12 156 Smith—New South African Fish. FAMILY SCORPAENIDAE. Amblyapistus marleyi Regan. Regan, Ann. Durban Mus., 1919, vol. II, pt. 4, p. 202. Text fig. 5. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, vol. XXI, p. 917. Depth 22, length of head 4 in length of body. Eye 3 in head, twice interorbital and almost twice snout. Anterior profile of head almost vertical, concave. Maxilla extends to below the anterior third of the eye. Small villiform teeth on jaws, and in a crescentic band on vomer. Palate edentulous. Nostrils tubular, situated one above the other immediately before the lower margin of the orbit; anterior covered by a plain flap. Gills 4, no slit behind the fourth. Membranes free from the isthmus. Gill- rakers reduced to mere knobs, 7 or 8 on the lower part of the anterior arch. Preorbital produced backwards into a strong spine, reaching to below the posterior margin of the orbit; a smaller spine below at the base of the larger. Four preopercular spines, the lower three small and blunt, the upper larger, slightly less than the preorbital spine, reaching to the opercular margin. Two spines on the upper margin of the operculum, completely covered by skin. Lateral line almost straight, tubules 23. Rudimentary cycloid scales, not imbricated, below the skin on the anterior parts of the body, visible externally on the belly and peduncle. Skin smooth and soft. D XV, 8. lst spine short, subequal to eye, in advance of anterior margin of orbit. 2nd and 3rd spines longest, subequal, 1} times length of head: bases of 2nd and 8rd spines apart by an eye diameter, 14 times as far apart as bases of 3rd and 4th spines. Membranes between 2nd and 8rd spines trapeziform, widening upwards. 6th spine shortest, less than half length of head, last spine 2 of 2nd spine. Membrane of soft dorsal joined to the peduncle at the base of the caudal. 5th ray longest. A III, 6. Commences below the 14th dorsal spine. Spines graduated, fairly stout. lst spine shorter than, 3rd spine almost twice, an eye diameter. Membrane of soft anal joined to the 13 Smith.—New South African Fish. 157 peduncle an eye diameter away from the base of the caudal. 3rd ray longest. P. 12. Rounded, reaches to above the 2nd anal spine. V. I. 5, reaches to the hinder margin of the vent. Caudal rounded, equal to head, rays 12. Colour. Brown, marbled and spotted with darker. Several dark blotches on the median fins. A light spot below the 9th dorsal spine, just above the lateral line. A single specimen, 147 mm. in length, from Mr, H. W. Bell Marley, Durban. Regan’s figure (loc. cit) shows neither the more or less trapeziform membrane between the 2nd and 8rd dorsal spines, nor the variation in the basal spacing of the anterior dorsal spines. Regan distinguishes this species from taentonotus, C. and V., by the greater length of the preorbital and upper pre- opercular spines. Barnard (loc. cit) quotes the latter species as having the 2nd and 3rd dorsal spines of the length of the head, and uses. this in his key to the South African species of the genus. Day (Fish of India, p. 157, pl. XX XVIII, fig. 5) quotes the 2nd and 3rd dorsal spines of taenionotus as being equal to the depth of the body, which his dimensions make to correspond with about 1+ times the length of the head. His figure (loc. cit) on the other hand shows these spines to be 2 of the length of the head. In view of this discrepancy, a re- examination of the type of taenionotus appears desirable. FAMILY SYNANCIIDAE. Caracanthus zeylonicus Day. 1869. Day. Proc. Zool. Soc, p. 515 (Amphiprionichthys zeylonicus ). | 1878. Day. Fish of India, p. 158. Pl. XXXVIII, fig. 6. (Micropus zeylonicus) . Body deep compressed. Dorsal profile elevated, snout steep, blunt. Depth 2, length of head 21in length of body. Eye 4 in length of head, 14 times interorbital width, slightly less than snout. Interorbital space slightly convex, preorbital deep. Mouth moderate, terminal, somewhat oblique. Small villi- form teeth in bands on jaws only. Tongue small, adnate to floor of mouth, Maxilla extends to below anterior third of eye. Nostrils 14 158 Smith—New South African Fish. paired, tubular. Gills 4, no slit behind the fourth. Gill rakers moderate, slender, 13 on lower limb of anterior arch. Gill mem- branes united to the isthmus. Pseudobranchiae present. Branchiostegals 5. Preorbital produced into a laterally projecting spine, which is directed downwards and backwards. Preopercle with five spines, the upper pair small and blunt, the lower pair at the angle enlarged and recurved. A similar stout spine on the interopercle; subopercle with a blunt spine. One moderate and two very small blunt spines on the opercle. A finely serrated ridge runs from above the orbit along the nape. | Arborescent muciferous canals on the head above the pre- opercle. D VII, 18. Deeply notched between the spinous and soft portions. 1st spine minute, remaining spines increase in length to the 4th, which is 13 times the diameter of the eye, then decrease rapidly to the 7th, which is scarcely one third the diameter of the eye. Rays articulated, branched. The first two rays are subequal to the eye, the 3rd to the 9th almost twice as long, while the remainder are shorter than the first ray. A II, 11. Commences below the middle of the soft dorsal. Spines minute, not externally visible. Rays articulated, branched, subequal to eye. P. 13, rounded, rays articulated. Ventrals thor- acic, reduced to a pair of spines scarcely visible. Caudal rounded, rays articulated. Peduncle stout, deeper than long. Lateral line a continuous tube with 13 single tubules opening dorsally. The L. 1 follows the dorsal profile, and is obsolescent on the anterior part of the caudal peduncle. Scales absent, papillae on head and body, skin soft and velvety. Colour. Uniform dark brown, becoming lighter ventrally. A single specimen, 37 mm. in length, from Great Fish Point. This appears to be the first record from South Africa. The species is recorded by Day (loc. cit.) as occurring at Malabar and Ceylon, and its presence so far south is very inter- esting. Further search will doubtless reveal its presence on the eastern coasts of Africa. 15 Smith—New South African Fish. 159 FAMILY TETRODONTIDAE, Tropidichthys oxylophius n. sp. (Pl. XVI.) Body deep, moderately compressed. Dorsal profile elevated. Snout concave. Profile strongly concave below chin. Back sharply ridged with apex slightly nearer tip of snout than base of caudal. Nostrils imperforate immediately before the orbit. Interorbital space strongly concave. Moderately prominent ant-orbital ridge. Depth 2, length of head 2 in length of body. Eye 34 in head, equal to the interorbital width, slightly less than snout. Eye midway between tip of snout and apex of ridge on back. Mouth small: upper teeth projecting beyond lower. Teeth subequal. Small 2-rooted spines which lie flat on the skin on most of head and body. Head spinulose except post-orbital and chin. From above and below centre of orbit, the anterior spines are directed forwards and upwards: the posterior spines are directed mostly backwards. Immediately before the orbit is a larger spine, 3 times as long as the others, directed upwards. Most of the body is spinulose: no spines on the posterior third of the body, on the peduncle, on a small area behind the pectoral or on the top of the dorsal ridge from the apex to the base of the dorsal fin. On the lower part of the body, the roots of the spines are produced below the skin, giving this area a somewhat reticulate appearance. Skin rugose. D. 9, rays simple, well back, on posterior third of body. A. 9, rays simple, commences below posterior margin of base of dorsal. D. and A. subequal in length to diameter of eye. P. 18, rays simple, equal to snout. Caudal rays 9, branched. 14 in length of head: subtruncate. : Colour. Uniform dark brown above, uniform light orange below. Slightly lighter ovate mark with light margin and with a short white oblique line below base of dorsal. Extremely fine dark lines running obliquely from eye to snout. Fins light yellow. A single specimen 32 mm. in length from Kareiga river mouth, near Port Alfred. Type in the Albany Museum. The occurrence of a species of this genus as far west as Port Alfred is rather interesting, no other species having been 16 160 Smith—New South African Fish. recorded south-west of Natal. It may be here noted that I have found many species hitherto regarded as confined to the eastern coasts of Africa extending regularly along the southern coast at least as far west as Knysna. The author desires to acknowledge gratefully financial assistance received from the Carnegie Grant in aid of Research, through the Research Grant Board of South Africa, which defrayed part of the expenses incurred in the collection of specimens. Rec.: Albany Mus. Vol. IV | Plate XVI Tropidichthys oxylophius n. sp. x 14. Blewnius fascigula Barnard x 75. Clinus agilis n. sp. x 17. Synaptura barnardi n. sp. X yo. 17. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXt. Part Il. pp. 125-127. Pl. IX. April, 1933. AN INTERESTING NEW MYCTOPHID FISH FROM SOUTH AFRICA. By J. L. B. Smira. (With Plate IX.) Family MycTopPHIDAE. Genus Myctophum Raf. The subdivision of the numerous polymorphous species of this genus has proved attractive, if somewhat troublesome. Goode and Bean (Ocean. Ich., 1895, p. 71) proposed an elaborate scheme, which has little practical or taxonomic value, since it is based mainly upon features which can have but little natural significance in these fishes. A simple and more natural scheme, based upon the nature and arrangement of the luminous organs, in the form in which it has been suggested by Brauer (Zool. Anz., 1904, vol. xxvili; Wiss. Erg. Deutsch. Tief-See Exp. Valdivia, 1906, vol. xv, pt. 1) has been accepted by most systematists. Brauer considers that there is but a single genus, Myctophum Raf., but recognises the four sub- genera Myctophum Raf. s.s., Lampanyctus Bon., Diaphus Hig & Hig, and Lampadena G. & B. - Since all species hitherto discovered have fallen more or less satisfactorily into one or other of the subgenera, these have acquired a possibly fictitious taxonomic significance, and Parr (Bull. Bing. Oc. Coll., 1928, vol. in, Art. 3, p. 49) has proposed the raising of the subgenera to full generic rank. This may prove to be of doubtful value, since, not only is our knowledge of these fishes far from complete, but renewed subdivision of Lampanyctus and Diaphus is almost certain to be proposed. The remarkable specimen described below does not fall within the limits of any one of these proposed four genera, but would appear to call in question the full generic distinction of Lampanyctus from Diraphus, since it to some extent bridges the gap between them, but also possesses certain features characteristic of neither. This would appear to involve either renewed subdivision of Diaphus, or the institution of yet another subgenus of the single wide genus Myctophum. The latter alternative appears preferable, and is here adopted. 18 126 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Nasolychnus, new subgenus. No luminous plates on peduncle. Luminous scales present or absent. Antorbital organs enlarged, probably always continuous above and below nostrils. Photophores circular, without dividing septum; five, or more or less than five, precaudal. The two infrapectoral organs probably never in line with the first pectoral organ. Spongy, probably luminous, tissue between the ventral bases, not corresponding with the scale pockets. Maxilla extending well behind eye, posteriorly dilated. This subgenus is closely related to Diaphus, from which, however, it differs in several features. Myctophum (Nasolychnus) florenti n. sp. Body elongate, moderately compressed, width 1-7 in depth. Dorsal profile even, snout blunt, almost vertical before eye. Depth 5-1, length of head 3-9 in length of body. Eye 4 in head, 1-8 times snout, 1-2 in interorbital width, and 2-6 in the postorbital part of the head. Strong median ridge on snout. Preopercle margin very oblique. Mouth large, maxilla extends 1-7 times eye diameter behind eye, posteriorly dilated. Minute teeth in both jaws and on palatines, pterygoids, and tongue: a few rudimentary teeth on sides of vomer. Gill rakers 25, slender, 2 in eye. D 19, commences above the ventrals, 5th ray longest, 1-7 in head, last ray 4 in head. Edge of fin straight. Base of dorsal as long as head. Adipose dorsal just behind end of anal base. A 19, commences below the 14th dorsal ray, 5th ray longest, 2:1 in head, last ray 6 in head, edge of fin gently concave. Base of anal 1-25 in length of head. P 12, inserted in lower third of side, 3-3 in head, does not reach to ventral base. V 9, inserted twice as far from base of caudal as from centre of eye, 1-7 in head, reaches to vent. Caudal deeply forked, densely scaled. Photophores circular, without dividing septum. (Brauer’s terminology is hereemployed.) PLO much nearer lateral line than pectoral base. Upper PVO above pectoral base, lower behind upper. The PLO and the two PVO form an almost straight series with the 2nd (? 3rd, vide infra) PO. 5 PO, first twice as far from second as remainder from one another (there may have been 6 PO, since on each side the scale behind the anterior PO is missing, see figure). VLO twice as far from ventral base as from lateral line. 5 VO in a gently curved series, 3rd highest. 4 SAO, the anterior three forming a gently curved oblique series with the posterior VO. Upper SAO in lateral line, forming a straight oblique series with posterior (4th) SAO and first antero-AO. 7+9 AO. 2 Pol, upper almost in lateral line, in a straight oblique series with last antero-AO. On one side 4+1 Pre, 19 An Interesting New Myctophid Fish from South Africa. 127 separate from AO, last separate, highest, just below end of lateral line: on the other side there are 1 +2+1 Pre, the posterior as before, the remainder being arranged 1+2, with two rudiments between. Branchiostegal organs 3, obscure. On one side 3 opercular organs, upper small ; lower two large, contiguous or partly fused, expanded ventrally. Upper organ absent on other side. Antorbital organs conspicuously enlarged, continuous above and below nostrils. A cuneiform patch of white, probably luminous tissue between ventral bases, about half eye diameter in length, not covered by scales and not corresponding with the scaling. No luminous plates. No true luminous scales, but most scales on the body and the top of the head with a central irregularly shaped light patch, probably luminous. Dorsal sheath scales mostly with central luminous patch. Edges of fontanel white, probably luminous. Scales cycloid, 1.1. tubes 46, 1.1. scales not enlarged, |.tr. 4 (from origin of dorsal), about 15 predorsal, 4-5 scales on cheek. Colour.—Uniform brown, antorbitals bright silvery. Photophores opalescent with black tissue before and behind. Proximal third of ventrals hight. Length.—136 mm. Type.—A ripe female, in the Albany Museum. Locality —Bushman’s River, near Port Alfred, found on the shore by Miss Florence Hewitt. The photophores on the cheek, and the Prec, as indicated above, are not the same on both sides. The 4+1 Pre is evidently normal, while the 1+2+1 on the right side is most probably not, since there are two rudi- mentary or defective organs between the first and the second. It is an open question whether the photophores here described as the posterior (4th) SAO, and as the lower Pol, might not be regarded as the first and the ninth antero-AO respectively, elevated above the rest. Since the remaining AO are in two regular horizontal series, it appears preferable to regard these others as belonging to the SAO and to the Pol respectively. Considering that this remarkably large specimen was cast up by waves, although some of the scales are missing, it is in a remarkable state of preservation, so as to lead one to conclude that even a somewhat fragile dividing septum, such as is present in Diaphus, would still be intact in some of the photophores, had it originally been present. The eggs are about 0-6 mm. in diameter, and are certainly exceedingly numerous. ALBANY MUSEUM, GRAHAMSTOWN. ‘ds -u s2zuasoyf (snuyohjosp ay) wnydopoh W Plate IX. Neill & Co., Ltd. tee Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. X XI. J. L. B. Smith. 21. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXI. Part Il. pp. 129-150. Pls. X—XII. April, 1933. THE SOUTH AFRICAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS HEMIRHAMPHUS CUV. By J. L. B. Smira. Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. (With Plates X-XII and one Text-figure.) Cuvier, Reg. Anim., 1817, 11, p. 186. Body elongate, subcylindrical or compressed. Lower jaw produced into a long beak, with teeth only in the part opposite the edges of the premaxillae. A cutaneous fringe from corner of mouth on each side to apex of beak: a median bilobed sac expanded at origin below the chin, tapering forward to below tip of beak. Premaxillae, fused with maxillae, produced, forming a flattened triangular upper jaw, naked or scaly. Teeth small, conical, bi- or tricuspid, in bands in both jaws. Ventrals abdominal, » nearer to base of caudal than tip of upper jaw. Pectorals inserted above middle of side, not longer than head. Dorsal originates far back, much nearer base of caudal than base of pectoral. Caudal forked or emarginate, the lower lobe longer. Scales cycloid, moderate or large, deciduous. Lateral line ventro-lateral in position, commences on chest, ends before base of caudal: a superior branch to pectoral base. Lateral line tubes with few or many inferior tubules. Gull-openings wide, gill-rakers numerous, well developed. Third upper pharyngeals fused. Air-bladder simple or cellular. | Subgenera of Hemirhamphus Cuv. have several times been proposed. Gill (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1859, p. 131) instituted the genus Hyporham- phus for species with ventrals inserted nearer head than caudal base, and air-bladder simple. Fowler (‘‘ Fishes Oceania,’ Mem. B. P. Bishop Mus., 1928, x, p. 75) has proposed the subgenus Rhynchorhamphus for species with triangular part of upper jaw longer than wide, beak very long, and ventrals nearer caudal base than head. To Hemirhamphus (s.s.) are then assigned species with ventrals nearer caudal base than head, upper jaw wider than long, and air-bladder cellular. | The position of the ventrals appears to be a most unsatisfactory feature ‘on which to found an allied genus, or even a subgenus of Hemirhamphus, 22 130 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. for in the species we find regular variation of this position from midway between caudal base and tip of pectoral to midway between caudal base and eye, several species having the ventrals inserted exactly midway between caudal base and head. The shape of the upper jaw and the length of the beak have little to recommend them as features for a similar purpose, since it is shown in the present work that these vary considerably with the growth of the fish. The South African species alone show the doubtful utility of the sub- genera as defined above: delagoae Brurd. has the simple air-bladder of Hyporhamphus, but the ventrals inserted as in Hemirhamphus ; knysnaensis n. sp. has the ventrals inserted midway between caudal base and head, thus falling midway between Hypohamphus and Hemirhamphus, the triangular part of the upper jaw in adults longer than wide, as in Rhyncho- rhamphus, but the beak is not very long, while the juvenile stages have the upper jaw wider than long, or as wide as long, according to the stage of growth. I cannot therefore accept the present forms in which the above sub- genera appear. Generic subdivision may more sharply and with greater justification be based upon other features, such as the presence or absence of scales on the triangular part of the upper Jaw, which is constant at all stages, or upon the nature of the growth changes observed during the early and mid- Juvenile stages. As will be seen below, these stadia of far Forsk. show primary increase in the relative length of the ventrals, followed by recession, together with very considerable changes in the shape of the dorsal fin. In knysnaensis n. sp., on the other hand, no such changes with growth are observed ; further, the triangular part of the upper jaw of knysnaensis is scaly, but naked in far. These two species may be regarded as sub- generically distinct, but until complete information on these points is available it would appear inadvisable to subdivide Hemirhamphus Cuv., and I do not here propose to attempt such a step, since it would serve no useful purpose as far as the South African species are concerned. The South African species have received somewhat scant attention, and stood in need of critical revision. -Two new species, knysnaensis and wmprovisus, are here described, and balinensis Blkr., which has not previously been recorded from our region, is now included. | Two species, marginatus Forsk. and schlegeli Blkr., which have been recorded from the neighbourhood of, but not strictly within the limits of, our region (after Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, xxi, p. 4, south of Mossamedes, west coast, and of Mozambique, east coast), are included, since with more intensive collection they are sure to be discovered here. In South Africa the species of Hemirhamphus are generally known as 23 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 131 ‘“ Naald-vis ” or “ Needle-fish,” also as ‘‘ Half-beaks.’’? They are of little or no economic significance, most of them being rather small and seldom taken in number. far is occasionally taken in moderate numbers by dragnets in the summer months, but is not generally in demand as a food- fish. Terms employed in the Descriptions. Since the beak and the caudal fin of preserved specimens are frequently damaged, the dimensional relationships are not here stated in total length only. The following limits are employed :— Length of Body.—Measured from caudal base (v.i.) to tip of triangular part of upper jaw. | Length of Head.—Measured from hind margin of operculum to tip of upper jaw. Length of Beak.—Measured from below tip of upper jaw to apex of beak. Base of Caudal.—This is taken as the base of the mid-caudal rays, generally obscured by scales. Lateral Rows of Scales.—Counted from above the hind margin of the operculum to caudal base, not including scales extending on to the caudal rays. Lateral Line.—F¥igures indicate the number of scales bearing tubules, and the count is taken as follows, e.g. 5007098’ which indicates 4 from pectoral base down to junction, 2 from chest to junction, 27 from junction to ventral base, and 28 posteriorly from ventral base. Key to the South African Species. A. Upper jaw naked. Ventrals nearer base of caudal than base of pectoral. 1. Black blotches on side. Body subquadrangular in cross-section, not very compressed . . . . . . . . . . . far. 2. No blotches on side. Body fairly compressed. . . . marginatus. B. Upper jaw scaly. Ventrals inserted midway between base of caudal and base of pectoral, or nearer the latter. 1. Mid-caudal rays not longer than eye. Caudal deeply forked. Dorsal scaly. a. 50-52 lateral rows of scales. Pectoral and ventral not scaly . . . . . . dussumiert. b. 58-61 lateral rows of scales. Pectoral and ventral scaly. i. Beak 6:3 in total length. Preorbital 1-3 times longer than deep, not as long as eye . . . delagoae. ii. Beak 4-5 in total length. “Preorbital 1. 8-1: 9 times longer than deep, as long as eye . . . . . . . balinensis. 24 132 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. 2. Mid-caudal rays longer than eye. Caudal emarginate. Dorsal not scaly. a. Ventrals nearer hind margin of preopercle than base of caudal. Upper jaw wider than long, with 3-4 transverse series of scales, middle series over median ridge improvisus. 6. Ventrals nearer base of caudal than hind margin of preopercle. Upper jaw not wider than long, with 2 transverse series of scales, median ridge not covered by scales. i. Upper jaw longer than wide. 55-58 lateral rows of scales. South and east coasts . knysnaensis. ii. Upper jaw: as wide as long. 50-53 ‘lateral rows of scales. West coast schlegelt. Hemirhamphus far Forsk. (Plate XII, fig. 1.) 1853. Bleeker, Nat. T¥dschr. Ned. Ind., v, p. 89 (fasciatus). 1866. Bleeker, Atlas Ich., vi, p. 54, pl. vi, fig. 3. 1878. Day, Fishes of India, p. 516, pl. cxx, fig. 3. 1908. Gilchrist, Ann. S.A. Mus., vi, p. 266 (commerson1). 1913. Weber, Siboga-Exp. Fische, p. 131 (fasczatus). 1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fishes Indo-Aus. Arch., iv, p. 157, fig. 55 and p. 158 (marginatus, juvenile = fasciatus Blkr.). 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., xxi, p. 262. Adults. Body elongate, robust, width 1-3-1-5 in depth. Sides scarcely convex, form, with almost flat ventral surface, a right-angled ventro-lateral edge. Depth 6-8, length of head 4-3-5-3, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-3°5 in body, 4-4-5 in total length. Eye 4-4-4 in head, 1-2-1-5 in snout, 1-6—1-8 in postorbital part of head, and 1-1-1-5 in interorbital width. Width of snout before eyes § of its length. Head slightly depressed, interorbital gently convex, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves. Top of head scaly to above nostrils. A slight medio-longitudinal ridge on the triangular part of the upper jaw, which latter is thick and fleshy, scaleless, and 1-3-1-9 times as wide as long. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout almost an eye diameter. Fairly stout tricuspid teeth in 3-4 rows in lower and 2-3 rows in upper jaw. Beak stout, cutaneous fringes about half the width of the beak: subgular sac prominent. Preorbital 1-3 times deeper than long, depth about half-eye diameter; covered by a single scale. Opercle with one large and two smaller scales. A single series of scales on the cheek, extending forward to below the corner of the mouth. Gill-rakers 20-23, fairly stout, 3-5 in gill-filaments which are 1-5 in eye. Branchiostegals 12-13, membrane and mentum scaleless. 25 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 133 D 13-14, arises twice as far from base of caudal as from base of ventral. Anterior rays elevated, 3rd longest 1-7-1-9 in head, remainder decrease rapidly to the penultimate, which is about 9 in head, the fin having a deeply concave edge. The last ray is elongate, about 5 in head, with hinder branch free from membrane. Anterior. fourth of fin densely scaled. A 10-13, commences below the 6th or 7th dorsal ray. Anterior rays elevated, 3rd longest 2-5 in head, remainder decrease to the penultimate, which is about 9 in head, the fin having a gently concave edge. The hinder branch of the last ray is slightly longer than the preceding rays. Anterior third of fin densely scaled. Base of anal 1-6-2 in length of base of dorsal (rarely more than 1:8). P 12, 1-3-1-7 in head, scaleless. V 6, scaleless, 2-2—2-8 in head, inserted midway between base of caudal and almost the tip to distal fourth of pectoral. 1st and last rays longest, subequal, inner four rays graduated, shorter than Ist and last; last ray about 1-3 times the length of the penultimate. Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe shorter, 1-3-1-4 in length of lower ; mid rays shorter than or equal to eye. Peduncle fairly robust. Air-bladder cellular. Scales.—Lateral rows 55-58, 1.1. , predorsal 37-39, 3 +26 — 27 +21 — 22 6-7 between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes highly arborescent ventrally (Plate X, A), more elaborated in anterior scales. Colour.—Blue-green above, silvery below, dorsal scales light, with dark margin; opercle bronzy. Beak and membranes black, tip of beak red. A silvery-plumbeous stripe with blue upper margin from base of caudal along side curving gently over pectoral base and ending on shoulder: widest midway. 4-10 more or less distinct dusky blotches on side chiefly above lateral stripe. Dorsal, most of caudal, anterior part of anal, and ventrals, except last ray, dusky. Pectorals light. Ripe fishes usually have reddish blotches on the abdomen. Length.—200-533 mm. Locality. Eastwards from False Bay, entering tidal rivers from Breede River, Port Beaufort to the Zambesi River, Rhodesia, occurring even in the Mazoe River, a tributary of the Zambesi, in fresh water miles from the coast. Distribution.—Almost circumtropical. Juveniles. . Very young specimens show considerable divergence from the adult form chiefly in the size and shape of the fins and of the jaws. The following 26 134 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. table indicates certain of the features of change with the growth of the fish :— Ee nnn Tn inteal SanEEEEE SERaEISDT SEnSnissAttesn nnn ea a SS iE: as Total length (mm.) . 12| 18 | 24 | 33 | 53 | 60 | 72 | 115) 135] 195) 295 | 533 Depth in body . .|>10|>10/ 10 |10}9 |9 {9 {84)8 18 | 7 | 65 Head in body . . lea. 4 loa. 4 | 4:5 | 4:5) 4:5] 4:5 | 4:8 | 4-8] 4-8) 4:3 | 4-5 | 4-9 Beak in total length . |None |ca. 20] 9 6 |5 |45] 48144) 44] 4:3] 461 5-0 Triangular upper jaw, wide as long . . | .. lea. 7 jea. 7 Ica. Tica. Sica. 5) 4 | 2-5 | 2-5] 2-0] 1-4} 1-4 Eye in head . . lea. 2 |ca.2-5} 3 13 | 3-2} 3:3/3-3)3-5/3-7)4 | 4 | 43 Eye in snout. . .. |cea.0-4/ca.0°5| 0-6 | 0-7 | 0-8 | O-B | 1-1] 1-1] Ld | 14] 15 Eye in postorbital part head. . . ca.1-3) 1-5 | 1-6} 1-5 | 1-7) 1-7] 1-7) 1-7) 1-7] 1-7) 1:8 Pectoral in head . jea.l-5jca.1-5} 15 | 1:5) 1-4) 1-4) 1-4] 1-4] 1-4] 1-6) 1-4) 1-7 Ventral in head . . joa. 4 joa. 3 | 2:0 | 1-8) 1-6] 1-6] 1-7] 1-5] 1-6] 2:0) 2-4] 2:8 Upper caudal lobe in lower. . . jea.l-O} 1-1 | 1-2 | 1:6] 1-8] 1-6] 1-6) 1-7) 1:5] 1-4) 1-4) 1:3 Shortest caudal rays ineye . . . |ca.0-5| 0-7 | 0-7 | 0-8] 0-8 | 0-8 | 0-9 | 0-9} 0-9] 1:0) 1-1) 11 Features which do not change appreciably with growth are the shape of the anal fin and the relative size and shape of the pectorals. The Mouth and Jaws. There is no prolongation of the lower jaw in fishes not exceeding 15 mm. in length: the adult proportions are attained when the total length is 50-60 mm. Fishes 100-200 mm. in length have relatively longer beaks than larger examples. (See above table.) The mouth is at first almost vertical and changes to nearly horizontal with the growth of the upper jaw, which commences only when the lower jaw is fully prolonged. Very young fishes have a single row of teeth, many of which are conical, though tricuspid teeth are observed at all stages: the number of rows increases with age. Ventral Fins. In very small fishes the ventrals are inserted midway between the base of the caudal and the middle to distal third of the pectoral. The point of insertion moves somewhat towards the caudal with growth of the fish. The ventrals are fairly small in the youngest stadia, increase in relative length until the fish is about 100 mm. in length, and thereafter decrease. In specimens 50-120 mm. in length the ventrals reach the base of the anal or beyond. The shape of the fin also undergoes modification: in fishes not longer than 60 mm. they resemble in shape that of the ventrals in an adult of the Exocoetid genus Cypsilurus Swnsn.: the 3rd ray longest, Ist shortest, 6th intermediate between lst and 3rd, remainder graduated : the distal third of the fin being subacutely triangular in shape. With 27 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 135 growth of the fish, the Ist, 5th, and 6th rays increase in relative length, while the 3rd becomes shorter, so that when the fish is about 200 mm. in length, the 5th ray is longest, the 4th and 6th slightly shorter, subequal, Ist ray shortest. Further growth results in the change to the adult form | in which the Ist and 6th rays are longest, subequal, the 2nd ray shortest, edge of fin concave. Dorsal Fin. When the length of the fish does not exceed 50 mm. the posterior dorsal rays are about twice as long as the anterior, and when laid back reach on to the caudal: the edge of the fin is straight. The relative length of the rays changes with growth: at about 100 mm. total length the anterior and posterior rays are subequal, the mid rays shorter, the anterior margin of the fin being concave: at about 150 mm. the anterior rays are 1-5 times the posterior, and the anterior part of the fin has the subfalcate shape of that of the adult. The posterior rays laid back no longer reach to the caudal. When the fish is about 200 mm. in length the shape of the fin approximates to that of the adult. Coloration. Very small fishes (35 mm.) are dusky green, with dendritic specks uniformly distributed over the body, approximating anteriorly to the scaling. Beyond this stage faint cross-bars appear, and with growth increase in density. In fishes exceeding 50 mm. in length there are 10 cross-bars on the body, one across the base of the caudal rays and a wide blotch over the distal portion of the lower caudal lobe: the caudal bars and the ventral portion of the bars on the side are rust-red in colour. The cross-bars on the body are prominent in fishes of 60-200 mm. in length, the ventral portion, and the caudal bars fading with growth. In all but the smallest specimens the ventrals are black, the pigmentation retreating somewhat distally with growth, while the first ray becomes light. The dorsal and anal are at first almost wholly dark, the pigmented area retreating distally with growth, until in larger specimens the anterior part of each fin and a broad marginal band only are dark. The pectorals are uniformly unpigmented. The lateral stripe is not visible in specimens of less than 30 mm. total length. Fishes 50-100 mm. in length frequently have dark blue spots on the head. Beak and membranes black: tip of beak red in advance of mid-juvenile stage. H. fasciatus Blkr. is undoubtedly the juvenile form of far. Weber and de Beaufort’s diagnosis (loc. cit.) of fasciatus as juvenile margenatus Forsk. was evidently based upon the relative lengths of the bases of the anal and dorsal fins, which these authors state to be in far base anal 2 in base VOL. XXI, PART II. 10 28 136 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. dorsal, and 1-5-1-7 in marginatus. In our specimens of far, the base of the anal is usually 1-6-1-8 in the length of the base of the dorsal, occasional specimens showing 1-8-2. Our specimens show also further divergence from the usual diagnosis of far: the last ray of the ventrals and of the dorsal are elongate, longer than the penultimate ; the number of scales in lateral series and the number of predorsal scales are greater : the anterior portion of the dorsal is more subfalcate in shape, while the body is not as deep nor the head as long as in specimens from other areas. It may be noted that the figures of Day (loc. cit.) and of Weber and de Beaufort (loc. cit.) are not strictly in accordance with the respective descriptions, while none of our specimens have the markedly fusiform body indicated in these figures, but are deepest across the middle of the pectorals, even fully ripe fishes. I have examined several specimens from the Indo-Pacific and find that they have the base of the anal 1-8-2 in length of dorsal base and 51-55 lateral rows of scales. From the nature of the other features men- tioned above, it would appear that most descriptions of far have been based upon old, preserved, and possibly damaged specimens. Breeding Habits, Etc. In the Knysna and neighbouring rivers specimens of far are first observed early in October, all ripe adults. The numbers increase rapidly, attaining a maximum in December and January. Ripe and spent adults are found until March, after which only a very occasional specimen is encountered, and none are present after the end of March. The young appear in November, become exceedingly abundant by January, and disappear entirely by March. The eggs of far are demersal, 2-95-3-1 mm. in diameter, translucent, and provided with numerous glutinous filaments not longer than the diameter of the egg. The larger females produce about 12,000 eggs per season at Knysna. The breeding fishes, which appear to travel even beyond the tidal area in the rivers, congregate in shallow water over grassy banks, where two or more may frequently be seen slowly circling over a restricted area. In one case, two specimens so engaged were captured, and on examination, one, the larger, proved to be a ripe female, and the other a ripe male. | H. far may also be taken by allowing a fine line, baited with a small “shrimp ” or “ mud-prawn,” to drift in the surface of the water: these larger specimens are exceedingly lively and provide most excellent sport on light tackle. The flesh is of fine texture and flavour, but is not gener- ally esteemed on account of the presence of numerous fine bones. 29 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 137 Hemirhamphus marginatus Forsk. 1775. Forskal, Descr. Anim., p. 67. 1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fishes Indo-Aus. Archip., iv, p. 157. 1928. Fowler, “ Fishes Oceania,’ Mem. B. P. Bishop Mus,, x, p. 78 (record only). Body fairly compressed, width 2-3 in depth. Depth 5-3-6-5, length of head 3-7-4-2, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-3-3-5 in body, 4:5-5-1 in total length. Eye 3-8 in head, 1-3 in snout, 1-4-1-7 in postorbital part of head, and equal to or slightly greater than interorbital width. Head slightly depressed, interorbital gently convex, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves. A slight medio-longitudinal ridge on the triangular part of the upper jaw, which latter is more convex above than in other species, and 1-3-1-5 times as wide as long, scaleless. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout slightly more than half an eye diameter. Tricuspid teeth in 2 rows in upper and 3-4 rows in lower jaw. Beak slender. Preorbital 1-2 times longer than deep, # eye diameter in length. Single series of scales on cheek. Gill-rakers 23, 2-3 in gill-filaments, which are 1-6 in eye. D 13-14, arises 1-5-2 times as far from base of caudal as from base of ventral. Anterior rays elevated, about 1-9 in head, edge of fin deeply concave. Densely scaled anteriorly. | A 10-13, commences below the 6th dorsal ray. Anterior rays elevated, about 3 in head, edge of fin concave, last ray elongate. Scaly anteriorly. Base of anal 1-5-1-7 in length of base of dorsal. P 11, 1-2—1-3 in head, scaleless. V 6, scaleless, 2-6 in head, inserted midway between base of caudal and distal third of pectoral, first and last rays longest, subequal. Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe shorter, 1-3 in length of lower; mid rays shorter than eye. Air-bladder at least partly cellular. 3-4 Scales.—Lateral rows 53-56, 1.1. 5349799. LL? predorsal 34-38, 6 between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes arborescent ven- trally. Arborescent muciferous canals on scales of head in some specimens. Colour.—Blue-green above, silvery below. Plumbeous lateral stripe curving up over pectoral base. Beak and membranes black. Dorsal dusky, dark anteriorly. Caudal dusky, darker marginally. Pectorals and ventrals light. Length.—Up to 350 mm. Locality.—Gold Coast. Distribution.—Almost circumtropical. This species has not yet been recorded from within our area, but is 30 138 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. sure to be discovered on our eastern coast. I have examined specimens from the Indo-Pacific, and one specimen, loaned by the British Museum, from Accra. It is very closely related to far, from which it differs in the absence of the lateral blotches as well as in the highly compressed body, in the narrower interorbital, and in the fairly convex upper surface of the upper Jaw. Hemirhamphus dussumeri C. and V. 1846. Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., xix, p. 33. 1925. Fowler, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., lxxvu, p. 203. 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., xxi, p. 263. Body elongate, subcylindrical. Depth 9, head 4:5, in length of body. (Lower jaw 4-5-5 in body, 5-6-3 in total length.) Eye 4 in head, 1-5 in snout, 1-5 in postorbital part of the head, slightly less than interorbital width (slightly less than or equal to interorbital). Width of snout before eye # of its length. Head moderately depressed, interorbital flat, scaled, three transverse series. A medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which is 1-3 times as wide as long, scaly, 5 longitudinal and 3 transverse series of scales. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout 3 of eye diameter. Small tricuspid teeth in fairly wide bands in both jaws. Beak stout, cutaneous fringes narrow, subgular sac small. Preorbital 1-5 times longer than deep, covered by a single scale. Two series of scales on cheek, scaling extends forward to below tip of snout. A single line of pores on chin. Opercle naked, scales evidently fallen off. Gill-rakers 28, 3 in gill-filaments, which are 1-5 in eye. D 15 (14-16), commences slightly nearer base of ventral than base of caudal. Anterior rays elevated, almost 3 in head; remainder decrease, edge of fin concave. Fin scaly. A 15 (13-15), commences below the third dorsal ray. Similar in shape to dorsal. Fin scaly. Base of anal slightly less than base of dorsal. P 11, 2 in head, not scaly. V 6, not scaly, 3-3 in head, inserted midway between base of caudal and centre of opercle. Caudal deeply forked, lower lobe longer. Mid rays 3 of eye diameter. Air-bladder simple. Scales.—Lateral rows 52 (50-52), lateral line , predorsal 33 3 3 +22 +427 (32-34), 6 scales between dorsal and lateral line. Colour (preserved).—Light brown, evidently bright green-blue above, silvery below. Fins light. Numerous close-set blue spots on head and snout and in a mid dorsal line to the origin of the dorsal. Length.—Up to 300 mm. 31 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 189 Distribution.—East coast of Africa, Indo-Pacific. I have seen only one specimen of this species, from Aden, lent by the British Museum. It would appear that a revision of this species is highly necessary, for not only do descriptions vary rather widely, but authors differ in the nominal species admitted as synonyms. Day (Fishes of India, 1878, p. 515) includes dussumiert, described by Bleeker (Atl. Ich., 1866, vi, p. 56) in the synonymy of reynaldi C. & V. This is accepted by Weber and de Beaufort (Fishes Indo-Aus. Arch., 1922, iv, p. 155), who consider both synonyms of dussumieri C. & V., and who somewhat arbitrarily admit erythrorinchus le Sueur to the synonymy of dussumiert C. & V., but do not give expression to the admitted priority of the former name. Fowler (“ Fishes Oceania,” suppl., 1931, p. 319) considers dussumert C. & V. a synonym of erythrorinchus le 8. Klunzinger (“ Fische Rothe Meer,’ Verh. Zoo. Bot. Ges. Wien, 1871, p. 584) gives a description of dussumiert C. & V. which does not agree with many other descriptions of this species, as indicated by Day (loc. cit.), whereas Weber and de Beaufort accept it as dussumiert C. & V. In my opinion, many specimens of erythrorinchus le 8. have been described as dussumiert C. & V., but it would appear that this latter species may well be maintained as distinct from the former, provisionally differ- entiated by the presence of scales on the dorsal and anal fins, postorbital part of head more than 1-4 times eye, mid-caudal rays less than eye, and ventrals nearer head than caudal base. Fowler’s Delagoa Bay specimens (loc. cit.) are most probably dussumiert C. & V. (as here defined), although this author states the relation of neither the postorbital part of the head, nor of the mid-caudal rays, to the eye, while his specimens have D 13, and only 18 gill-rakers on the lower part of the anterior arch. In so far as I am able to determine, erythrorinchus le 8. does not fall within or near our area. Hemirhamphus delagoae Brnrd. (Plate XII, fig. 2.) 1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., xxi, pl. x, fig. 6. Body elongate, slightly compressed, sides scarcely convex. Width 1-25 in depth. Depth 10, length of head 4-8, in length of body. Lower jaw 4-9 in body, 6-3 in total length. © Eye 3-8 in head, 1-4 in snout and in postorbital part of the head, slightly greater than the interorbital width. Width of snout before the eyes 32 140 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. about % of its length. Head depressed, indications of scales on occiput. Slight medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is twice as wide as long, scaly, 4-5 longitudinal and 3-4 transverse series of scales. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout about § of eye diameter. | Uni-, bi-, and tricuspid teeth present in anteriorly tapering bands, in 3-5 rows in each jaw, inner teeth mostly tricuspid, outer mostly uni- cuspid. Beak stout, cutaneous fringes 4-} as wide as beak; subgular sac moderate. Preorbital 1-3 times longer than deep, length 1-6 in eye, covered by a single scale with 2 central-branched pores. Three large scales with branched pores on opercle. 3-4 series of scales on cheek, scaling extends forwards to below the tip of the snout. Gill-rakers 24, moderately slender, 1:3 in gill-filaments which are 3 in eye. Branchiostegals 12, membrane scaly. Mentum broad and densely scaled to symphysis, about 20 longitudinal and 4 transverse series of scales. D 15, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of caudal and ventral. Anterior rays elevated, 2-2 in head; remainder decrease, edge of fin concave. Densely scaled, heaviest anteriorly. A 16, commences below the 2nd dorsal ray. Shape similar to dorsal, anterior rays about 2-5 in head. Densely scaled. Base of anal 1-25 in base of dorsal. P 12, 1-8 in head. Base densely scaled, scaling extends over half the length of the fin. V 6, scaled, densely on basal portion, length 3in head. Inserted midway between base of caudal and base of pectoral. Anterior rays longest, last slightly longer than penultimate. Edge of fin concave. Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe 1-3 in lower. Mid rays slightly less than eye. Peduncle fairly stout. Air-bladder simple. 4 Scales.—Lateral rows 61, 1.1. 2597 098° predorsal 40, 6 rows between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with numerous inferior tubules (Plate X, C). Colour.—Greenish-blue above, silvery below. Nape, occiput, snout, and opercle dusky. Lower jaw and membranes black, tip of beak red. A narrow plumbeous lateral stripe from the base of the caudal to axil of pectoral, widest below origin of dorsal. Anterior dorsal rays dusky, remain- ing fins light. Length.—295 mm. Locality —Delagoa Bay. Lype.—In the South African Museum (No. 12303). 33 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 141 The original description is inaccurate in many particulars, nor does the figure agree with the description. This species is very closely related to balinensis Blkr., but differs in the shorter beak, in the size and shape of the preorbital, and in the much wider upper jaw. The eye is relatively larger in delagoae than in balinensis. It ig an open question whether these differences alone justify the maintenance of delagoae as distinct from balinensis, the shorter beak of the former species being the only difference of note. Fowler (Ann. Nat. Mus., vi, pt. 2, p. 250) considers that delagoae is identical with unifasciatus Ranz. The errors in the original description have evidently misled Fowler, for delagoae is well differentiated from unifasciatus by the position of the ventrals alone. Hemirhamphus balinensis Blkr. 1858. Bleeker, Nat. Tydschr. Ned. Ind., xvu, p. 170. 1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fishes Indo-Aus. Arch., iv, p. 152. Body moderately compressed, width about 2 in depth. Depth 9-10, length of head 4:5, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-4 in body, 4-8-4-9 in total length. Eye 4:5 in head, 1-5-1-6 in snout, 1-6-1-9 in postorbital part of head, equal to the interorbital width. Width of snout before the eyes % of its length. Head depressed, occiput scaly. Slight medio- longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is 1-1-1-:3 times as broad as long, scaly, 4-5 longitudinal and 3-4 transverse series of scales. Bi- and tricuspid teeth present in anteriorly tapering bands, in 3-4 rows in each jaw. Beak slender, cutaneous fringes narrow, subgular sac moderate. Preorbital 1-8-1-9 times as long as deep, as long as eye, covered by a single scale with 2 central pores. 2-3 series of scales on cheek, scaling extends forwards along sides of beak almost half-length of beak. Gill-rakers 22-26, slender, 2 in gill-filaments, which are about 2 in eye. Branchiostegals 12, membrane scaly. Mentum moderate, densely scaled to symphysis, about 20 longitudinal and 4 transverse series of scales. D 15-16, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of caudal and ventral. Anterior rays elevated, about 3 in head, remainder decrease to the penultimate, last ray elongate. Edge of fin concave. ‘Densely scaled, anteriorly. A 16-18, commences below the 2nd dorsal ray. Shape similar to— dorsal. Densely scaled. Base of anal as long as base of dorsal. P 12, base scaly. V 6, 3-5 in head, inserted midway between caudal base and hind margin to middle of opercle. Edge of fin concave. Base scaly. Caudal deeply forked, mid rays as long as eye, lower lobe longer. Air-bladder simple. | 34 142 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. 3 | — _ |, _—__———_,, predorsal 39-41, Scales.—Lateral rows 61-64, | 3098-99 428-99 p 6 between dorsal and 11. Lateral line tubes with numerous inferior tubules, resemble closely those of delagoae (see Plate X, C). Colour (preserved).—Brown, darker above. Narrow dark stripe from base of caudal to axil of pectoral. Fins light. Length.—Up to 220 mm. Locality.—Mombasa. Distribution.—Indo-Pacific. The inclusion of this species in our fauna-list is based upon a specimen, lent by the British Museum, labelled dussumiert C. & V. from Mombasa. This specimen agrees generally with the diagnosis of balinensis Blkr., but differs in the rather light scaling on the vertical fins. Circumstances prevented a comparison of this specimen with two specimens of balinensis Blkr. subsequently kindly presented by Dr. de Beaufort, but there is little doubt that the Mombasa specimen is conspecific. The above description is based chiefly upon the two Indo-Pacific specimens. Hemirhamphus improvisus n. sp. (Plate XI, fig. 1.) Body elongate, robust, slightly compressed, sides slightly convex, width 1-3in depth. Depth 8:5, length of head 4-5, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-4 in body, 5 in total length. Eye 3-9 in head, 1-6 in snout, and in postorbital part of the head, 1-2 in interorbital width. Width of snout before the eyes 1:5 in length of snout. Head depressed, interorbital flat, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves. No scales on occiput or interorbital, but these may have fallen off. Scarcely perceptible medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is slightly broader than long, scaly (fig. 1, B), 6-7 longitudinal and 3 or 4 transverse series : scaling extends over medio-longitudinal ridge. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout § diameter of eye. Tricuspid teeth in 5-6 rows in lower, and in 6-7 rows in upper jaw. Beak fairly stout, cutaneous fringes half as wide as beak; subgular sac moderate. Preorbital deeper than long, depth 1-8 in eye, a central pore. indicating a scale, evidently fallen off. 2 large and 1 small scales on opercle. 2-3 series of scales on cheek, scaling extending forward on man- dible to below middle of upper jaw. Gill-rakers 20, slender, 1-5 in gill- filaments, which are about 2 in eye. Branchiostegals 10: membrane naked ; mentum narrow, naked. D 14, arises very slightly in advance of midway between bases of caudal 35 Lhe South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 143 and ventral. Anterior rays elevated, 4th longest about 2 in head; re- mainder decrease, edge of fin concave. Scaleless. A 15, arises below 2nd dorsal ray. Similar in shape to dorsal, anterior rays slightly longer than longest dorsal rays. Fin scaly anteriorly and along base. Base of anal 1-2 in base of dorsal. P 18, not scaled, 1-5 in head. V 6, not scaled, length 2-6 in head, 2nd ray longest, Ist and 3rd equal, remainder decrease. Inserted midway between base of caudal and middle Fia. 1.—Diagram to show type of scaling on upper jaws of A. H emirhamphus knysnaensis n. sp. and B. Hemirhamphus improvisus n. sp. of preopercle. Caudal slightly emarginate, mid rays 2-5 times eye. Lower lobe slightly longer than upper. Peduncle moderately slender. Air-bladder simple. Scales.—Lateral rows 53, Ll. _ 4 predorsal 38, 6 rows between 2 +22 + 25 dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with 2-4 inferior tubules. Colour.—Greenish above, silvery below. Nape, occiput snout, and top of opercle dark. Lower jaw and membranes black, tip of beak red. Median fins with dusky margins. A faint blotch on upper middle caudal rays. Remaining fins light. A silvery lateral stripe with dark upper border from base of caudal to axil of pectoral. Length.—218 mm. Locality.—Delagoa Bay. Type in the South African Museum (No. 16368). H. improvisus is closely related to schlegeli Blkr. and to knysnaensis n. sp., but is sharply distinguished from these by the character of the scaling on the triangular part of the upper jaw. In improvisus the middle of the 3 longitudinal series of scales is disposed centrally over the median ridge on the upper jaw, while the other two species have only 2 longitudinal series of scales which do not cover the median ridge (fig. 1, A and B). 36 144 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. H. improvisus is further distinguished from schlegeli and knysnaensvs by the more anterior position of the ventrals and by the more obtuse upper jaw. The interorbital is markedly wider and the dorsal fin originates further back in improvisus than in schlegeli or knysnaensis. Hemirhamphus knysnaensts n. sp. (Plate XI, fig. 2.) 1916. Thompson, Mar. Bio. Rep., ili, p. 266 (calabaricus). 1925. Barnard, Ann. §.A. Mus., xxi, p. 262 (calabaricus part). 1929. Fowler, Ann. Nat. Mus., vi, pt. 2, p. 250 (unifasciatus). Adults. Body elongate, slender, slightly compressed, about 14 times as deep as wide. Depth 9-3-10-9, length of head 4-3-5, in total length. Eye 4-4-3 in head, 1-5-1-6 in snout, 1-5-1-7 in postorbital part of the head, and subequal to the interorbital width. Width of snout before eyes about % of its length. Head depressed, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves. Top of head scaly. Medio-longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is slender, 1-1-1:3 times longer than wide, scaly, 4-5 longitudinal and 2 transverse series of scales: scales not overlapping medio-longitudinal ridge (fig. 1, A). Width of lower jaw below tip of snout about half-eye diameter. Minute curved conical teeth (unicuspid) in 2-3 rows in lower and 3-4 rows in upper jaw; a few tricuspid inner teeth in larger specimens. Beak slender, cutaneous fringes as wide as beak; subgular sac small. Preorbital slightly longer than deep, less than eye, covered by a single scale with central pore. Opercle with one small and two large scales. 2 series of scales on cheek, scaling extends forward along side of mandible about an eye diameter beyond below the tip of the snout. Gill-rakers 25-28, slender, 2 in gill-filaments, which are slightly longer than 2in eye. Branchiostegals 10, membrane and mentum scaleless. D 16-17, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of caudal and ventral. Anterior rays slightly elevated, 3rd longest, about 3 in head; remainder decrease to the last, which is about 5 in head. Kdge of fin slightly concave. Scaleless. A 16-18, commences below the 2nd or 3rd dorsal ray. Shape similar to that of dorsal. Length of base slightly less than that of dorsal. Scale- less, or few basal scales in large examples. P 11, conspicuously short, 1-8-2 in head. Scaleless. V 6, scaleless, about half the length of the pectoral, inserted midway 37 Lhe South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 145 between base of caudal and base of pectoral to hind margin of operculum ; usually nearer base of caudal than hind margin of head. Anterior rays longer. Caudal moderately forked, upper lobe shorter, 1-2 in lower: mid rays 1-6-2 times eye. Peduncle slender. Air-bladder simple. 3 Scales.—Lateral rows 55-58, 1.1, —__—_______, predorsal 34-35, 3+ 26 —28 +22 —24 5-6 rows between dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with one to four inferior tubules (Plate X, B). Colour.—Blue-green above, silvery below. Nape, occiput, snout, and opercle dusky. Beak and membranes black, tip of beak red. A narrow, plumbeous lateral stripe from upper edge of pectoral base to base of caudal, broadest (2 in eye) below origin of dorsal. In ripe males this stripe extends on to and over the lower caudal lobe. Anterior portion of dorsal dark, lighter posteriorly. A dark spot at the base of each dorsal and anal ray. Caudal with marginal area dusky. Remaining fins light. Length.—95-220 mm. Distribution.—South and east coasts of Africa. From False Bay to Natal, entering rivers, extending into fresh water. Types from Knysna in the Albany Museum. Juveniles. The young of this species are very slender and show main divergence from the adult form in the extent of the prolongation of the lower jaw and to a lesser extent in the shape of the caudal. The dorsal, anal, and pectoral fins approximate throughout in size and shape to those of the adult. The ventral fins are searcely visible in very small specimens (< 12 mm.), but thereafter rapidly attain and remain at the adult proportions. When 7 mm. in length the young are transparent, with a few dusky specks on the dorsal surface. The mouth is very oblique, the lower jaw not prolonged, and the triangular part of the upper jaw many times wider than long. The caudal is symmetrical, almost truncate, and there ig no trace of the lateral stripe. The lower jaw is first observed to project when the fishes exceed 10-12 mm. in length, and thereafter increases rapidly in relative length, the proportions of the adult in this feature being attained when the total length of the fish exceeds 30 mm. The relative increase in the length of this feature is shown on p. 146. At 10-12 mm. length the specks on the body are darker, and the first signs of the lateral stripe are seen as a series of short, dark longitudinal 38 146 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Total length of Lower jaw in specimen (mm.). total length. 16 16 20 10 23 6:6 27 55 31 5-0 33 4-6 lines. The lower caudal lobe is now the longer. The lateral stripe is visible as such in specimens exceeding 20 mm. in length, and the caudal is markedly asymmetric. The mouth becomes less oblique, and the pro- longation of the upper jaw commences when the length exceeds 25 mm. At about 30 mm. total length the triangular upper jaw is about 4 times wider than long; at 70 mm. it is almost as long as wide; at 80-100 mm. as long as wide; thereafter gradually more acute, until in specimens over 200 mm. in length it is as much as 1-3 times longer than wide. At all stages the beak is black, the red tip appearing in the later juvenile stages. This species is closely related to schlegeli Blkr. and improvisus n. sp., from which it is distinguished by the more acutely triangular part of the upper jaw as well as by the greater number of scales in a lateral series, and of dorsal and anal rays. It is also related to georgi C. & V., from which it differs in the shorter beak, as well as in the more anterior position of the ventrals and in the greater number of dorsal and anal rays. The two specimens from False Bay, very inadequately described by Fowler (loc. cit.) as unifasciatus Ranz, are most probably knysnaensis. Breeding Habits, Etc. Hl. knysnaensis appears to be present in the tidal rivers of South Africa throughout the year, extending into fresh water. Ripe fishes are first en- countered in October and are most numerous.in November and December. The young are exceedingly abundant in these months, and are present until February, after which they disappear. It is curious that the ripe fishes of this species have not been observed to congregate in any special areas, but are encountered in the surface of deep as well as shallow water, from two to four swimming one behind the other. Females predominate markedly in number. The eggs are demersal, 1-6 mm. in diameter, almost transparent, and densely covered with glutinous hair-like filaments, considerably longer 39 The South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 147 than the diameter of the egg. The larger females produce about 10,000 eggs per season. Hemirhamphus schlegeli Blkr. 1862. Bleeker, Mem. Soc. Holl. Haarlem, p. 120, fig. 1. 1866. Gunther, Cat. Fish. Brit. Mus., vi, p. 266 (calabaricus). 1866. Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3), xvili, p. 427 (calabaricus- schlegelt Blkr.). 1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., xxi, p. 262 (calabaricus part). Body elongate, subcylindrical, about 14 times as deep as wide. Depth 9-9-4, length of head 4:4, in length of body. Lower jaw 3-3-3-6 in body, 5-5-2 in total length. Eye 3-8-4 in head, 1-2-1:3 in snout, 1-5 in postorbital part of the head and subequal to the interorbital width. Width of snout before eye 3 of its length. Head depressed, interorbital flat, with 2 shallow longitudinal grooves, scaly, 3 transverse series. Medio- longitudinal ridge on triangular part of upper jaw, which latter is slender, as long as wide, scaly, 3-4 longitudinal and 2 transverse series of scales, not overlapping median ridge. Width of lower jaw below tip of snout about half eye diameter. Small conical, bi- and tricuspid teeth in 3 rows in each jaw. Beak slender, cutaneous fringes almost as wide as beak; subgular sac small. Preorbital almost as deep as long, covered by a single scale with central pore. Three series of scales on cheek, scaling extends forward to below corner of mouth; a single line of peres on the side of the chin. Gill-rakers 22-26, slender, 2-3 in gill-filaments, which are about 1-5 in eye. Branchiostegals 10, membrane scaleless. D 14, arises considerably in advance of midway between bases of caudal and ventral. Anterior rays slightly elevated, 3rd longest, 2-5 in head, remainder decrease, last 5 in head. - Edge of fin gently concave. Scaleless. A 15-16, commences below 2nd dorsal ray. Shape similar to dorsal ; slightly higher than dorsal. Length of base slightly less than that of dorsal. Scaleless. P 11, 1-7-1-8 in head, scaleless. V 6, scaleless, half the length of the pectoral, inserted midway between base of caudal and hind margin to middle of opercle. Anterior rays longer. Caudal emarginate, upper lobe shorter, 1-3 in lower. Mid rays 1-5-1-7 times eye. Peduncle slender. Scales.—Lateral rows 50, 1.1. predorsal 35, 6 rows between 4 2424 +22’ dorsal and lateral line. Lateral line tubes with 2 or 3 inferior tubules. Air-bladder simple. | Colour (preserved).—Brownish yellow, darker above. A dark lateral stripe from base of caudal to axil of pectoral, widest below origin of dorsal. 40 148 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Anterior dorsal rays and margin of caudal dusky. Remaining fins light. Beak black. Length.—140-215 mm. Locality.— Angola, Cameroons. Distribution.— West coast of Africa. This species does not strictly belong to the South African fauna, but is included here since it is almost certain to be discovered within our regian. Fowler (Ann. Nat. Mus., 1929, vi, pt. 2, p. 250) considers schlegeli identical with unifasciatus Ranz. This is scarcely possible, since this latter species has a very short beak, ventrals inserted midway between caudal base and eye, and dense scaling on the dorsal and anal fins. Notes on the H emirhamphidae. These fishes appear to live almost exclusively in the surface of the water, and show high specialisation of habit with adaptive modifications in external form. The leaping powers of the species of Hemirhamphus are markedly characteristic. These fishes emerge from the water with the body rigidly straight, and the leap is terminated either by falling flat upon the surface, or, in the case of the smaller specimens, with the caudal first entering the water. I have not yet seen any of these fishes ending a leap by diving head first into the water. The ventrals are fully extended laterally during the leap. As many as six or seven immediately consecutive leaps have been observed, the pause between each for renewal of the impulse being extremely brief. Adult specimens of H. far cover 10-15 feet in each leap, and are able to progress up to 100 feet along the surface in this manner, at an average speed of at least 25 feet per second. Very young specimens of this species are apparently unable to emerge from the water and are very easily captured, even by day. H. knysnaensis, a smaller species, progresses in a similar fashion along the surface, but the body is held at an angle of about 45° to the surface, the leaps are very short, 1-2 feet, and are seldom repeated more than 4 or 5 times. Half-grown specimens of this species show an interesting stage in the development of this power. When startled, these fishes shoot up until the body as far as the ventrals is out of the water at an angle of about 45° to the surface: with ventrals widely extended, the body is held in this position, and urged forward along the surface for a few yards at a surprising rate, the caudal vibrating with extreme rapidity. As far as has been observed, none of these fishes, small or large, attempt to escape attack, even from above, by diving, which would appear to indicate that they do not readily sink from the surface for any purpose. 41 Lhe South African Species of the Genus Hemirhamphus Cuv. 149 The leaping powers of these fishes have led Schlesinger (Phy. and Eth. d. Scombr., Verh. Zoo. Bot. Ges. Wien, 1909, lix, pp. 302-339) to conclude that the closely related Exocoetidae have developed from the Hemirham- phidae. It would appear more reasonable to suppose that both forms have developed simultaneously from a common surface-dwelling ancestral type, the enlargement of the “ beak” of the Hemirhamphidae and the pectorals of the Hzocoetidae representing later specialisation. The very young stages of species of Hemirhamphus have no “ beak,” while the pectorals of the very young of certain species of the Exocoetidae are relatively consider- ably less elongate than those of the adult fishes. The adoption of a purely surface life in the case of the Hemirhamphidae (and of the Hzocoetidae) is further indicated by the ventro-lateral position of the lateral line in these fishes. Functions of the “ Beak.” Schlesinger (loc. cit.) has concluded that the prolonged lower jaw of the Hemirhamphidae is employed to plough up the bottom mud in search of food, and he discounts the statements of other investigators that the stomach contents of these fishes consist solely of surface plants and organisms. | It has been previously indicated that there are reasons for believing that the Hemirhamphidae are exclusively surface-dwellers. I have ex- amined microscopically the stomach contents of many specimens of various species of Hemirhamphus, and it is significant that in no case was any trace of sand-particles observed. The aliments generally appear to consist of surface plants, larval crustacea and fishes, and pelagic eggs. The Mugilidae are also surface-dwellers, but feed not only upon surface organisms, but also upon material obtained by skimming or stirring up the bottom mud and eel-grass (Zostera) in shallow water ; sand particles are invariably present in the aliments of the Mugilidae, frequently in large proportions. It appears inconceivable that the Hemirhamphidae could eliminate all trace of sand particles from food obtained by stirring up mud with the beak. Further, the tip of the beak of a live Hemirhamphus is soft, and the distal portions of the lateral cutaneous fringes extremely delicate and fairly vascular. These fishes rapidly succumb when the beak is damaged, and it is perhaps significant that among many hundreds of specimens I have taken alive none have been found with a broken beak. It would therefore appear extremely unlikely that the ‘“‘ beak ’’ is employed in the manner suggested by Schlesinger. From sustained observations, chiefly by night with the aid of a powérful light, it appears not unlikely that the prolonged lower Jaw, with its cutaneous 42 150 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. fringes, is employed by these fishes as an organ for the detection of the minute surface organisms which constitute their food. They lie in the surface of the water with the cutaneous fringes of the beak fully extended laterally. At frequent intervals the head may be seen to be jerked slightly to one side, the body urged forward, and motions concomitant with the assimilation of some particle ensure. Specimens will lie undisturbed in the light of a lamp, if cautiously approached ; the body may be touched with a very fine wire without occasioning undue alarm, but if the beak is only lightly touched, the fish withdraws violently. The function of the subgular sac remains obscure. The contents of the distended sac (rarely so observed after capture) appear to be liquid, and not gaseous, but sufficient could not be obtained for investigation. I wish to express my gratitude to Mr. J. Hewitt, Director of the Albany Museum, and to Dr. K. H. Barnard, Assistant Director of the South African Museum, for advice and assistance, and for the loan of material and literature ; to Mr. J. R. Norman of the British Museum for the loan of, and to Professor de Beaufort of Amsterdam, for the donation of, valuable specimens. Also for financial assistance from the Carnegie fund, through the Research Grant Board of South Africa, which defrayed part of the costs of the investigation. ALBANY Museum, GRAHAMSTOWN. Trans. Roy. Soc. §. Afr., Vol. XXT. Plate X LATERAL LINE SCALES, SEMI-DIAGRAMMATIC. A, Hemirhamphus far Forsk. B, Hemirhamphus knysnaensis n. sp. C, Hemirhamphus delagoae Brnrd. J. L. B. Smith. Neill & Co., Ltd. Plate XI. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. X XI. ‘(ayeur) ‘ds ‘u siswanushuy snydunysmazy ‘2 ‘ds ‘u snswmosdut snydumnysuazy *y zy) \ Py Neill & Co., Ltd. J. L. B. Smith, Plate XIT. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. X XT. ‘pruig avobojap snydunysvwmayy °% ‘ysiog wof snydupy.uwey *T o xh RIN (io wo i Neill & Co., Ltd. J. L. B. Smtth. 43. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXII. Part |. pp. 83-87. PI. IV. August, 1934. THE GROWTH CHANGES OF PTEROPLATEA NATALENSIS, G. anv T. By J. L. B. Smira, (With Plate IV and one Text-figure.) Famity DASYBATIDAE. Genus PreropLaTEA, Miller and Henle. 1913. Garman, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., p. 412. 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Museum, vol. xxi, p. 80. To the diagnosis of this genus add the following: “An ovoid flap of the iris extending over the pupil from the upper margin, increasing with age. A wide but low crenulate cutaneous flap on floor and on roof of mouth, behind the dental laminae, may be present. A small tentacle, on the inner posterior margin of the spiracle, sometimes present, decreasing with age, possibly becoming obsolete in large sexually mature individuals.’ Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T. 1911. Gilchrist and Thompson, Ann. S.A. Mus., vol. xi, pt. 2, p. 56. 1925. Barnard (loc. cit.), p. 81. The holotype of this species is a juvenile male from Natal, 280 mm. across the disc. It possesses a small pointed tentacle on the inner posterior margin of the spiracle, while the disc is markedly triangular in shape, with undulate anterior margin. The caudal spine has been stated not to be serrate, but this is an error. The serrations are present, but are hidden under the skin or by a coating of mucus. The only other species recorded from South Africa is mecrura, Bl. Schn. The identification is based upon two large specimens, one stuffed, one cast (from the Agulhas Bank), inthe S.A. Museum. This species has no tentacle, and the disc is subrhomboidal in shape. Very little appears to be known about the habits and development of species of this genus, nor, in so far as I have been able to ascertain, have the growth changes of any species been previously described. The present work is based upon the examination of a graduated series 44 84 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. of specimens, ranging from 104-1830 mm. across the disc, secured in the course of experimental netting in the Knysna estuary. These fishes appear to enter the river chiefly during the late summer and early winter months, but have been observed throughout the year. Of the specimens mentioned above, only two were sexually mature. These were gravid females, 1790 and 1830 mm. across the disc respectively, and each proved to hold eight embryos. The smaller of the two was taken near the mouth of the river, while the larger was captured about seven miles higher, where the salinity of the water is very considerably lower than that of the sea. The netters state that very large as well as very small specimens are by no means infrequently taken in the autumn. It is possible that gravid females may seek out the more protected waters of the river to give birth to the young. Since, however, sexually immature individuals are as frequently present, it is possible that the entering of the river may be purely fortuitous, for the mouth of the Knysna River is both wide and deep. In so far as may be judged from the stomach contents, the food of these fishes appears to consist of small fishes (Sparus sarba Forsk. and Mugil sps.) and crustacea, chiefly crabs. The larger of the two gravid females to which reference is made above might easily have been mistaken for a specimen of micrura, since there was no trace of a spiracular tentacle, and the disc was much less triangular in shape than that of the type of natalensis. The embryos it contained (5 2, 3 3) are, however, quite apparently conspecific with natalensis, since these all possess the spiracular tentacle, and are even more markedly triangular in shape than the type. These embryos (104-117 mm. across the disc) are far from mature: the appendicular yolk-sac is large, the caudal spine is unossified and adnate, while chromatophores are not visible, and filamentous external accessory gills are present. In the smaller of the two females (1790 mm.) the spiracular tentacle has been reduced to a mere knob, while the disc resembles that of the larger female. The embryos (6 2, 2 3, 265-280 mm. across the disc) are in this case mature. The yolk has been fully absorbed, external gills are absent, the coloration is fully developed, and the caudal spine is ossified, serrate and free. All possess the spiracular tentacle. One of these is shown in Pl. IV, fig. 2. Embryonic Forms. The width of the disc in the embryos is 1-6-1-7 times the length (tip of snout to level of hind margin of disc). The mid-point of the line joining the pectoral apices is 3-5-5-0 times as far from the tip of the snout as from the hind margin of the disc (in the type specimen 4:3). There does not 45 Lhe Growth Changes of Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T. 85 appear to be any appreciable change in the shape of the disc from the early to the later stages of embryonic development. The interorbital width is 0-9-1-3 in the snout (for convenience measured from midway between the centres of the eyes to the anterior point of the disc). In the very small specimens the eyes are pedunculated, and the developing iridal flap shows as a small but sharp convexity at the upper margin of the pupil. The caudal is 1-3-1-8 in the length of the disc, with a moderate cutaneous fold above and below. The ossification of the caudal spine is evidently one of the later processes of embryonic development, possibly taking place while the whole spine is adnate to the body of the caudal. The accessory external filamentous gills of the very small specimens are considerably longer than the disc. The coloration of the mature embryos is very similar to that of half-grown individuals, except that numerous round spots are more obvious. Post-natal and Mature Stadia. The disc changes from subtriangular to subrhomboidal with growth, becoming also relatively broader (fig. 1, A-F). The posterior margin of Fig. 1.—Diagram to illustrate the change in shape of the disc of Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T., with growth. Width of disc in mm.: A, 105; B, 280; C, 435; D, 610; E, 1080; F, 1830. the disc is gently convex, sometimes finely scalloped. The anterior mar- gin of the pectoral is gently undulate, with concavity about midway between pectoral apex and snout. The pectoral apices become less obtuse with growth. The interorbital width is equal to or slightly greater than the snout (see above). The eyes are prominent, and the iridal flap in the larger specimens covers most of the pupil. Length of spiracle about 2-5 in interorbital width, which is 10-12 in disc width. The 46 86 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. spiracular tentacle in young and half-grown individuals is slender and pointed, 8-10 in spiracle length; apparently diminishes with age. Caudal small, diminishing in relative length with growth (the accidental shorten- ing of this organ by injury is frequently observed in Dasybatids). Cutaneous fold, above and below, moderate. One or, more usually, two serrated spines near caudal base, short and stout. No dorsal fin or, as observed in one case, a mere rudiment, reduced to a small fold of thickened skin immediately anterior to the caudal spines. Skin smooth. Teeth tesselate, each rhomboidal base with a flattened triangular retrorse point. The number of the teeth in each row and the number of rows increases from 40 rows of 8-10 each in the smaller to 110 rows of 15-20 each in the largest specimens. Anterior and posterior margins of each lamina undulate: the upper lamina with anterior median convexity, the lower with median anterior concavity (Pl. IV, A and B). (Barnard’s comment, loc. cit., p. 81, on the paragraph about the dental laminae in the original description is rather severe. The meaning of this rather obscurely worded paragraph becomes clear when the laminae are examined.) Colour uniform brown above, or with darker or lighter vermiculations and blotches, light below. Tail with alternate dark and light annulations, becoming obscure in adults. The following table indicates the chief changes which take place with growth :— Sex. Ft | M.2 |] M8 F. F. F.4 F, F. Width disc in mm. . | 105 | 265 | 280 | 435 | 610 | 1080/1790} 1830 Length disc in width 1-6 | 1-7 | 1-75] 1-85] 1-9 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-0 Caudal in disc length . | 1:5 | 1:8 | 2:0 | 2-5 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 2:5 | 3-3 Pectoral line ® . | 50 | 4:2 | 4:3 | 3-2 | 2-6 | 1-95] 1-6 | 1-6 In fig. 1 ; ; .| A - B C D 1D) .. F 1 Most triangular immature embryo. 2 Plate IV, fig. 2. 8 Type specimen. 4 Plate IV, fig. 1. * The number of times that the mid-point of the line joining the pectoral apices is farther from the tip of the snout than from the posterior margin of the disc. This species is very closely related to altavela Linn., from the tropical Atlantic, from which it apparently differs in the markedly triangular disc, in the more obtuse pectoral apices and in the more more undulation of the anterior margins of the pectorals. These differences are slight, especially since altavela appears to be of somewhat variable form. Garman (loc. cit., p. 415) considers canariensis Val., valencienni Dum., and vaillanti Rochebr. conspecific with altavela. It is possible that the earlier figures of species are not always to be relied upon, but I have seen those of these 47 The Growth Changes of Pteroplatea natalensis, G. and T. 87 synonyms, and they differ very considerably one from the other. It is not unlikely also that very different stadia have been figured. I may here call attention to the fact that descriptions of the species of this genus rarely include the precise size of the specimens described, which, in view of the evidence here adduced, considerably diminishes their value. It would not indeed be surprising if natalensis were to be found conspecific with altavela. Barnard, loc. cit., probably had some such idea, since he remarks that the adult of natalensis, when found, would probably be found referable to a previously known species. I do not feel justified in pro- nouncing natalensis a synonym of altavela, since I have seen no authentically named specimens of the latter. It may be remarked that the growth changes of natalensis indicate that a revision of this genus, based upon adequate material, would prob- ably result in a somewhat drastic limitation of the number of species. It is evident that the shape of the disc, the length of the caudal, and even the presence or absence of the spiracular tentacle are, unless many equl- valent stadia are compared, not as reliable a guide to the differentiation of species as may hitherto have been supposed. At Knysna, natalensis is named “Backwater” by the netters: when caught, the fish lies flat against the net and so renders the retraction extremely arduous. The species is for this reason an extremely unwelcome capture, and also, in addition, since: its presence in the net appears to terrify the other fishes, great numbers of whom escape by jumping over the net. At Knysna this species is seldom taken on lines, but farther east it is not an infrequent capture. A large specimen of presumably this species was recently taken on a line in the Keiskama River, and in Natal waters it is no infrequent capture, large specimens proving formidable antagonists to the angler. I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of the S.A. Museum, for his kind assistance in regard to material and literature in the S.A. Museum. Also to the Carnegie Research Fund (through the Research Grant Board of South Africa) for financial assistance. ALBANY MUSEUM, GRAHAMSTOWN, August 1933. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate IV, pase } 1. Half-grown female, x 2. Mature male embryo. PTEROPLATEA NATALENSIS, G. and T. 1 10° A. Upper dental lamina of a specimen 1830 mm. disc width. B. Lower dental lamina of same. Neill & Co., Ltd. 49. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXII. Part |. pp. 89-100. Pls. V and VI. August, 1934. MARINE FISHES OF SEVEN GENERA NEW TO SOUTH AFRICA. By J. L. B. Smrra. (With Plates V and VI, and one Text-figure.) The following new genera are described below:— Family StromatErpaE, Papyrichthys. Family BarracnoipipaL, Batrichthys. Family SYNGNATHIDAE. M icrophis brachyurus Blkr. 1888. Day, Fishes of India, p. 680, pl. clxxiv, fig. 3 (Doryichthys bleekeri Day). 1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Indo-Aus. Fishes, iv, p. 44, fig. 21. Body moderately slender, depth 4-5 in head, almost as wide as deep. Head 4-8 in length to caudal base. Tail (without fin) slightly shorter than half distance from snout tip to vent. Eye 10, snout 1-6, and post- orbital 3-4 in length of head. Operculum with a slight medio-longitudinal ridge for the entire length; on one side 3, on the other 5, similar shorter, curved, radiating ridges below, all feebly serrate. Snout very compressed, with supero-median. ridge. Supra-orbital ridge continuous from temporal region on to snout. All ridges on head and snout feebly serrate. . Rings 22+23. Each body plate has 14-18 smooth parallel vertical ridges, which sometimes become furcated and reticulate below. Across _ Nee. COINS EEE EEE PELE Basse ecee a eS cee —lan__. Fia. 1.—Microphis brachyurus Blkr. the middle of each plate are 3 longitudinal curved ridges. The edge of each plate is serrulate, the serrae corresponding in number with the vertical ridges; last spinelet in each plate slightly enlarged. | The supero-lateral body ridge is discontinuous with the supero-lateral caudal ridge, and extends to the 7th caudal ring. The medio-lateral body 50 90 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. ridge curves down below the origin of the dorsal and unites with the infero-lateral caudal ridge on the 2nd caudal ring. The infero-lateral body ridge is not continuous with the infero-lateral of the caudal, and curves on to the ventral surface of the caudal, ending in the 2nd caudal ring. The supero-lateral caudal ridge curves down (forwards) below the hind end of the dorsal to medio-lateral, and extends as far as the hind margin of the last body ring. D 40, base not raised, as long as snout, originates on penultimate body ring, on 9 rings (2+7). A 5, very small, inserted below anterior dorsal rays. P 19, slightly longer than eye, emarginate. Caudal small, about 3 in snout, rounded. No brood pouch visible, presumably a female specimen. Colour.—Light brown, margins of plates lighter. Fins light; caudal dark. Length.—160 mm. A single specimen, from Durban, presented by HE. C. Chubb, Esq., Curator of the Durban Museum. M. brachyurus has been recorded from East Africa to the Indo-Pacific. The only other species of this genus hitherto recorded from Africa is smathu Dum., from the tropical west coast, which is stated to be fluviatile. M. brachyurus is closely related to this species, differing only in certain minor features, such as the longer snout and the more posterior insertion of the shorter dorsal. it is possible that wider collection may show that the two forms are identical. It appears preferable to maintain the Indian Ocean form as a separate species until such time as the recorded areas may be linked up. Family PLECTORHYNCHIDAE. Scolopsis vosmert (Bloch.). (Plate V, A.) 1878. Day, Fishes of India, p. 87, pl. xxiii, fig. 1. Dorsal profile even, body compressed, ovate. Depth 2-1, length of head 2-9 in length of body: eye 3-1 in head, slightly greater than snout and than interorbital width, 1-1 in postorbital part of head. Preopercular margin concave, strongly serrulate, spinelets directed obliquely outwards. Preorbital produced backwards into a prominent flat spine, extending almost to below hind margin of pupil: 5 graduated smaller spines below. Suborbital feebly serrated. Muciferous pores on anterior part of head. Mouth small, terminal, maxilla extends to below anterior margin of eye, almost entirely concealed beneath preorbital. Villiform teeth in bands in both jaws, tapering towards the sides, which have only a single row of 51 Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 91 teeth. Palate and tongue edentate. Gill-rakers 5, very short and stout; 3 in gill-fringes, which are 2-5 in eye. D X 9, commences above middle of operculum, not notched. 1st spine shortest, 4-4in head; 2nd 3-1; 3rd 2:6; 4th and 5th longest, 2-4; last 2-8 in head. Anterior rays equal to last spine. A III 7, commences below the 2nd dorsal ray. 2nd spine very stout, longest slightly longer than 4th dorsal spine. Vertical fins not scaly. P 18; 1:3 in head, rounded. V 15, 1-25 in head, inserted below 6th dorsal spine; 1st ray filamentous, reaches to base of 2nd anal spine. Caudal forked, upper lobe longer. Scales ctenoid, 1.1. 41, ltr. 34/14; 1.1. tubes bifurcate on anterior scales. Some posterior 1.1. scales have 2-3 superior branches each ending in a pore. 1.1. scales smaller than body scales, 4-5 series on cheek. Colour.—Yellow-brown, with a light band over the nape and a light stripe along the side. Dorsal dark anteriorly, other fins light; axil of pectoral and upper hind margin of operculum black. Length.—107 mm. Locality.—Presumably Port Alfred, having been found together with other unlabelled fishes among the old collection of the Albany Museum. Distribution.—Indo- Pacific. This is the first authentic record of a species of this genus from South Africa. As mentioned by Barnard (Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, xxi, p. 669), Playfair and Gunther record Scolopsis monogramma K. and v. H. from Mozambique, but without citing any authority. I have seen no recent work dealing with the species of this genus, but the older differentiation, based apparently largely upon coloration, appears none too sound, and is probably in need of revision. The presence of this species on our southern coast is noteworthy. The stretch of coast from Algoa Bay to East London has not before received much attention from ichthyologists, and has proved a rich collecting ground. Numerous species formerly believed to be confined to the western and south-western coasts (among others Congiopodus torvus (Gron.) and many species of Clinus Cuv.) have been found commonly occurring there, while many species normally accounted as tropical (e.g. among others Petroscirtes tapeinosoma (Blkr.), Monoceros Unicornis (Forsk.), and Albula vulpes (Linn.)) have also been found. The occurrence of the present species is therefore not in any way exceptional. 52 92 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Family BROTULIDAE. Grammonus opisthodon n. sp. (Plate VI, B.) Body compressed, moderately elongate, tapering uniformly from nape. Depth 4, length of head 3-2 in length of body. Eye 7, snout 4, interorbital 3-2, and postorbital 1-7 in length of head. Nostrils widely separated, anterior on snout. No barbels or spines on head, except for a strong spine, and a second, weaker, diverging on opercle. Preopercle margin below skin, with an obtuse ridge at the angle. Muciferous pores on head, very marked on chin. Snout obtuse, somewhat swollen. Mouth terminal, large, slightly oblique. Maxilla extends well behind eye, its length 1-7 in length of head, posteriorly dilated to a width equal to eye, with a retrorse spine on the hinder lower edge. A single series of fairly large curved conical teeth in each jaw: no villiform teeth. Two separate obtuse vomerine knobs, each with two large conical curved teeth. Palatines, ather bones, and tongue edentate. Gull-membranes separate, free from isthmus. Gills 4, a slit behind the 4th. Giull-rakers 3, long and spinose, plus 5 spinous flattened ridges anteriorly. Pseudobranchiae absent. Branchiostegals 6. Vent postmedian. D 65, originates 1-6 times as far from caudal base as from tip of snout, over middle of pectoral. A 35, originates 1-5 times as far from tip of snout as from caudal base. Median fins confluent with caudal. P 23, 1-5 in head, rounded, base enlarged. Ventrals each reduced to a single filament, about 4 in head, inserted below the opercle. No sign of any scales, or of lateral line. Caudal small, pointed. Length.—50 mm. Locality.—Port Alfred. Colour.—Brownish, with numerous small black spots. This interesting small specimen is unfortunately not in very good condition, and the absence of scales and lateral line cannot therefore be regarded as established. Since it does not appear to fall into any genus of this family of which I have a description, I forwarded the specimen to Mr. Norman of the British Museum, who, at my request, compared it with the Brotulids in their collection. It is apparently identical with none of these. I have provisionally assigned it to Grammonus Gill, with the diagnosis of which it agrees broadly. It differs in many features, however, the 53 Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. . 93 most marked being the presence of the maxillary spine, and in the absence of villiform teeth in the jaws and on the vomer, as well as in the absence of scales and of lateral line. Generic distinction in the Brotulidae appears to be rather fine, and the present species may well serve as the type of a new genus. This is, how- ever, largely dependent upon the discovery of specimens in good condition, in which the presumed absence of scales and lateral line may be confirmed. This is the first record of a species of this genus from South Africa. Two other species are known, both from the Mediterranean: ater Risso is probably bathybial and is said to come inshore to spawn; the other is armatus Doederlein, about which little is known. Family STROMATEIDAE. Papyrichthys n.g. Body ovate, very highly compressed, especially at the bases of the dorsal and anal fins, these regions being distinct from the body proper. Mouth large, slightly oblique. Maxilla excluded from margin of upper- jaw, almost entirely concealed beneath preorbital. A single row of moderate fine-pointed teeth in each jaw. Palatal teeth present or absent. Branchiostegals 5. Giull-opening wide, membranes free, rakers well developed. Pseudobranchiae present. Dorsal and anal very long, rays free from enveloping skin. Pectorals inserted low down. Ventrals of one short spine and five rays, longer than pectorals, inner rays longest, extending well behind origin of anal. Body and part of head covered with very small cycloid scales, probably always more than 100 in lateral series. Pores on head and body few or absent. Lateral line high, more or less following the dorsal profile. Air-bladder present. Pyloric caeca moderately numerous, branched. Vertebrae 40. Genotype pellucidus Liitken. | This genus is related to Psenes C. and V., but it is well differentiated — by the very minute scales, the size and shape of the ventrals, the very highly compressed body, and the greater number of vertebrae. I have examined a specimen of Psenes indicus Day, which apparently does not possess the many-branched pyloric caeca such as are found in Papyrichthys. This may prove a characteristic feature of this latter genus, although Regan (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1902 (7), X, p. 118) has given reasons why the nature of the caeca is not very reliable in defining genera in this family. Psenes is stated by Regan (loc. cit.) to have 25 vertebrae, but while he placed pellucidus in this genus, he had not seen a specimen, and merely followed Liitken’s diagnosis. | The very highly compressed plastic body, and the dentition, would 54 94 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. indicate that Papyrichthys is related also to Schedophilus Cocco, but it is distinguished from this genus by the absence of pores on the body and of the thickened porous skin on the occiput, as well as by the course of the lateral line. Papyrichthys pellucidus Liitken. (Plate VI, A.) 1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean. Ichth., p. 221, pl. lx, fig. 228 (Psenes pellucidus Liitken). 1902. Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), X, p. 125 (Psenes p.). Body soft and flabby, very compressed, maximum width at shoulder about 10 in length. Dorsal profile gently sloping from nape. Regions containing the dermal rays at bases of dorsal and anal fins very highly compressed, almost translucent, sharply defined. Snout very blunt, almost vertical, with slight mesethmoidal ridge. Depth 2:8, length of head 3-0 in length of body. Eye 4-0, interorbital (convex) 5, snout 3-4, and postorbital length 2-1 in head. Interopercle with traces of marginal spinules. Other bones of head entire. Preorbital with anterior trifid ridge. Bones of head soft and cavernous. A few pores on chin and head. None on body. Nostrils close together, much nearer snout tip than eye. Mouth large, terminal, slightly oblique, jaws equal. Maxilla extends to below the anterior third of the eye; end of maxilla slightly expanded. A single comb-like row of moderate, fine, pointed teeth, slightly recurved, in each jaw; those in lower jaw slightly larger. Palatal bones edentate, but signs of small teeth on vomer. Tongue free, edentate. Gill-rakers 13, longest slightly shorter than gill-filaments, 3 in eye, not very close set, spinulate below. Pseudobranchiae well developed. Branchiostegals 5. Pyloric caeca 10, each lobate, many- branched. D XII 34 (spines all broken, very weak), originates slightly behind preopercular margin. Anterior rays slightly shorter than mid-posterior, which are 1-7 in head. Hindmost rays slightly shorter. Bases of spines enveloped in skin; rays quite free, joined by membrane. A 35 (or I 34), originates below the 4th soft dorsal ray. Shape similar to dorsal; hinder rays of same length as corresponding dorsal rays. Rays free from skin. P 19, inserted low down, base slightly oblique. Fin rounded, 1-4 in head. Ventrals I 5, inserted below the pectoral base, 1-3 in head, inner rays longest, reach to the base of the 5th anal ray. Caudal damaged (forked according to G. and B., loc. cit.), 10+16 +10. Peduncle longer than deep, expanded posteriorly. 55 Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 95 Scales cycloid, very small, over whole body. Head apparently naked, but damaged. (On cheek, according to G. and B.’s fig., loc. cit.) Lateral line ascends to run. parallel with dorsal profile, almost an eye-diameter below. 1.1. about 125 (very approximately; G. and B.’s fig. shows 150). Colour (preserved).—Uniform light brown. Fins light; dorsal, anal, and ventrals with darkish margin. Length.—120 mm. A single specimen from Durban, presented by E. C. Chubb, Esq., Curator of the Durban Museum. There appears to be very little doubt that the present specimen should be assigned to pellucidus. The specimen is not in very good condition, but most of the features may be discerned. G. and B.’s figure shows a deeper body, more scales, a shorter snout, and the outer ventral rays longer than the inner. These differences are not significant, and may be due to the difficulty of observing accurately in so small a specimen as the type (about 60 mm. total length). This species has been recorded from the Atlantic (32° N. x 76° W.) from a depth of 528 fathoms, and its presence in Natal waters is of interest. Schedophilus medusophagus Cocco. (Plate V, C.) 1876. Gunther, Challenger Rep., xxu, p. 46. 1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean Ichth., p. 214, fig. 223. 1902. Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), X, p. 196 (Lirus m.). Body very compressed, ovate, extremely soft and pliable. Regions at bases of dorsal and anal, containing dermal rays, distinct and differen- tiated. Dorsal profile evenly convex. Snout slightly swollen, somewhat blunt. Interorbital strongly convex. Depth 2-6, length of head 3-9 in length of body. Eye equal to snout and to interorbital width, 4:6, postorbital length 1-8, in length of head. Preorbital depth 1-7 in eye. Preopercle with flat spinules round angle. Traces of spines on interopercle. Remaining bones entire. Occiput and snout with thickened porous integument. Almost whole of head except operculum densely pitted with pores: radiating series round orbit. Nostrils close together, midway between snout tip and anterior margin of eye: Gill-openings wide, membranes free. Rakers fairly long, 15 on lower part of anterior arch, longest slightly shorter than gill-filaments, 2 in eye. Rakers spinulose on basal half. Oesophagus with 14 papillate sacs. Vertebrae 42 (16 + 26). 56 96 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Mouth large, slightly oblique; jaws equal. Maxilla extends to below behind centre of eye: upper margin slips, for the whole length, beneath the preorbital. Supplemental bone not obvious, maxilla not, or scarcely, expanded posteriorly. Teeth in a single comb-like series in each Jaw, larger and smaller teeth alternating, larger teeth subspatulate. Palate and tongue edentate. D 52, commences above hind margin of head. First few rays appear spinate, but all but tip is hidden in scaly skinny sheath. Rays increase gradually in length to the middle of the fin; there about 3 in head, remain subequal to the posterior, which are slightly shorter. The whole of the fin with a scaly, skinny basal investment; longest rays emerge for less than half of their length. Fin low, rays inclined obliquely backward, apparently not fully erectile. A 35, commences below the 20th dorsal ray; shape of fin, length of rays, and skinny basal investment as for dorsal. P 20, inserted very low, 2-2 in head, base not oblique. A scaly, skinny investment almost half of length of fin. Upper rays longer. V 15, inserted very slightly in advance of the pectorals, 3in head. Last ray joined to belly bya membrane. Base of fin in scaly, skinny investment. Caudal gently rounded, 1-7 in head. Peduncle as deep as long. Scales cycloid, fairly small. 1.1. 135, very slightly curved anteriorly, becomes straight below the 12th dorsal ray, running obliquely down to peduncle. Whole of body and head, except interorbital and chin, scaly. A pore below almost every scale on body. Colour.—Uniform brown (preserved). Length.—230 mm. A single specimen, found among fishes collected by S.S. “ Pickle,” labelled “Natal Fishes,” unclassified, presented by the Director of the Government Fisheries Survey to the Albany Museum. Regan (loc. cit.) regards Schedophilus Cocco as a synonym of Lirus Lowe, and states that Lirus has 25 vertebrae and a small supramaxilla. There is no doubt that the two genera are closely related, but the greater number of vertebrae of Schedophilus, as well as other minor features, would appear to Justify the maintenance of this genus as distinct from Lirus. Meristic variation is alone of doubtful validity in defining genera, but since the other species of Lirus all presumably have 25 vertebrae, it would appear reasonable in this case. Further, I can find no signs of any supra- maxilla in my specimen, nor is any mentioned in any description, or shown in any figure of medusophagus to which I have access. It is with considerable doubt that the present specimen is assigned to medusophagus, since it differs in many significant features. The heavy dermal investment of the greater part of the dorsal and anal, as well as the 57 Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 97 similar partial investment of the pectorals and ventrals, is not mentioned in descriptions of that species. Giinther (fide G. and B., loc. cit.) states that the hinder dorsal and anal rays are not “erectile into the vertical position.” This is true of my specimen, but the reason for this is the skinny sheath. Further, both dorsal and anal are longer, and there are more rays in the present specimen, but medusophagus is stated to vary widely in these counts, so that the present differences may not be of specific significance. medusophagus has been recorded from the Atlantic and from Samoa. Its presence in Natal waters is of interest. Family ScoRPAENIDAE, Setarches gtinthert Johnson. (Plate VI, C.) 1876. Giinther, Challenger Rep., xxii, p. 19, pl. i, C (fidjiensis); p. 19 (parmatus). | 1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean. Ichth., p. 263; p. 264, fig. 249 (parmatus). Body moderately compressed, greatest width at nape. Head fairly depressed, interorbital almost plane. Depth 3-1, length of head 2-3 in length of body. Eye 6, snout 2-4, interorbital 4-5, and postorbital 2 in length of head. Head ridged and spinose. Preopercular stay prominent. Two long diverging spines on opercle. Suprascapula and coracoid exposed, each terminating in a flat spine. Three spines at angle of preopercle, slightly less than eye, the upper two on one side almost parallel (Pl. VI, A), the lower diverging: on the other side the three are equally divergent. Two others on lower margin, anterior smaller. Three preorbital spines projecting downwards over the maxilla. The anterior small and antrorse; the other two retrorse, graduated, the posterior the longer. Two low, flattened occipital spines, one similar postorbital spine, on each side, One antorbital spine projecting back over the eye, and one small retrorse nasal spine. Mouth large, somewhat oblique, maxilla highly expanded posteriorly, extends to below hind margin of orbit. Jaws subequal, no marked bony tubercle at symphysis of lower jaw. Upper jaw notched opposite symphysis. A narrow band of villiform teeth in each jaw. A chevron-shaped band, discontinuous at apex, of similar teeth on vomer. Similar teeth on palatines. The premaxilla has a supero-median expansion which slides under the maxilla. Premaxillary process short and curved. Nostrils tubular, close together, nearer anterior margin of eye than snout tip. Gill-openings wide, membranes free. Branchiostegals seven. Pseudo- branchiae present. Gill-rakers long, slender, 10 on lower part of anterior arch, anterior longest, almost equal to eye: gill-filaments short, about 3 in eye. VOL, XXII, PART I. 7 58 98 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. D XII 10, originates slightly in advance of hind margin of head. Ist spine equal to eye, then increase to the 4th, which is longest, 2-6 in head: thereafter decrease to the 11th, which is 6 in head. 12th spine more than twice llth. Soft dorsal rounded, midrays longest, almost 2 in head. A III 5, originates below the 3rd dorsal ray. P 22, 1-3 in head, base fairly broad, extends to below the 4th dorsal ray. The upper ray and on one side 3, and on the other the 4 lower rays simple, the remainder branched. Ventrals 1-9 in head, do not reach vent; Ist ray longest. | Caudal almost truncate, 1-1 in head. Peduncle compressed, as deep as long, equal to eye. Scales minute, cycloid. About 95 in lateral series. Lateral line raised, 26-27 perforations. Opercle and preopercle (above and below suborbital ridge) scaly. Rest of head naked. Colour.—Light red-brown. Fins light. Length.—190 mm. Locality Presumably Natal, being found among fishes labelled “ Natal Fishes,” unclassified. Collected by S.S. “ Pickle’’; presented to the Albany Museum by the Director of the Government Fisheries Survey. The three nominal species of this genus differ from one another only in unimportant details, and the types vary considerably in size. The type of guenthert, from Madeira, is 9 inches long; of fidjzensis, from the Fijis (315 fms.), 3 inches; while the type of parmatus, from New England (180 fms.), is only 2 inches in length, besides being damaged. The spination of the cephalic bones is evidently variable. In my specimen the arrangement of the preopercular spines is on one side inter- mediate between the arrangement on the other and the arrangement in gtinthert, in which they are stated to be parallel. The anterior (3rd) pre- orbital spine is not much exposed, and may not be obvious in the other specimens, especially in the smaller. The differences in depth of body and in the relative sizes of the fins of the various species described can be explained by the difference in size between the specimens, and cannot be regarded as of specific significance. Bathybial species are usually cosmopolitan, and the presence of this species in Natal waters, while of interest, is not in any way exceptional. Family BaTRacHOIDIDAE. Batrichthys n.g. Three lateral lines, each pore with minute cutaneous appendage above and below; middle line obscure. Jaws with tapering bands of small conical teeth. Larger teeth on vomer and palatines. Opercle with 2 59 Marine Fishes of Seven Genera new to South Africa. 99 spines. Subopercle with 2 spines; lower shorter, parallel or slightly divergent. Gill-opening fairly wide, extending from above the axil to below pectoral base. Gill-rakers few, short, obtuse or tubercular. Pharyn- geal teeth equal or graduated in size. Three dorsal spines. Caudal free. No axillary foramen. Interorbital almost plane. Frontal ridges feeble. Vertebrae 29. Genotype albofasciatus n. sp. This genus is closely related to Coryzichthys Ogilby (from the Indo- Australian area), which is stated to have very restricted gill-openings, embracing only the upper half of the pectoral base, and the pharyngeal teeth are unequal in size. Ogilby (Ann. Queens. Mus., 1908, No. 9) * places gangene Ham-Buch. in Coryzichthys, despite the fact that Day’s figure (Fishes of India, p. 269, pl. lx, fig. 1) shows this species to have gill- opening at least as large as the pectoral base. Day’s figure (which is named grunniens, probably in error) shows 5 ventral rays, which must be erroneous, and he neither described nor figured any lateral line system. There appears to be little doubt that gangene and the species described below are congeneric. | This genus differs considerably from the two genera, Batrachoides Lac. and Marcgravia Jord., the only two hitherto found in South Africa. Batrichthys albofasciatus n. sp. (Plate V, B.) Body robust, compressed behind. Head depressed, interorbital flat, skin slightly rugose. Depth 5-1, length of head 3 in length of body. Eye 5-5, snout 4, interorbital width 3-7, length of postorbital 1-6 in length of head. Six small barbels, about } eye, on each side of chin, and one at hind end of maxilla, and one at each side of upper jaw opposite symphysis. Conspicuous mucus pores on head, each with a minute cutaneous appendage above. Two short fimbriate nasal tentacles. No supra-orbital tentacles. Mouth large, maxilla extends to below posterior margin of orbit. Small curved conical teeth in posteriorly tapering bands in both jaws. Six larger conical teeth across vomer, with 4 widely-spaced smaller teeth anteriorly. A single series of similar teeth on palatines. Pharyngeal teeth curved, conical, of uniform size on upper; posterior teeth on lower pharyngeals slightly larger than anterior, no marked inequality in size. ~ Gill-membranes fused with isthmus, membrane expanded, fused with chest to below behind pectoral base. Gill-opening wider than the whole width of the pectoral base. Branchiostegals 5. Gill-rakers short, tubercular, * T have not seen this paper. 60 100 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. apically dilated or bifurcated, 8 on lower part of anterior arch. Two acute opercular spines, upper larger, divergent. Two similar on sub- opercle, upper larger, almost parallel. Vertebrae 29 (12 +17). D III+19, A 14. Soft dorsal and anal rays increase in length pos- teriorly, hind rays 2-5 in head. P 18, 1:5 in head, base heavy, sublobate. No foramen. Ventral 1-5 in head; spine in thickened skin. Caudal rounded, 1:4 in head. | No scales. Three lateral lines. Upper and lower distinct, middle obscure, consisting each of a row of pores, each with a minute cutaneous appendage above and below. Upper runs from opercular margin up to the soft dorsal and along the base of the latter. The middle line curves down from the same origin as upper and runs along the middle of the side, becomes obsolete before anal origin. The lower runs from the lower margin of the pectoral base down to the origin of the anal, and then along the base of the latter. | Colour.—Brown, irregularly mottled with darker, and with dark spots on the body, head, and all fins. Five slightly sinuous white cross-bars, hinder 4 extending on to soft dorsal. Length.—120 mm. Locahty.—Great Fish Point. Type.—In the Albany Museum. As indicated above, it is open to doubt whether this species should not be assigned to Coryzichthys Ogilby. The specimen described above is evidently bathybial, since it was thrown up after a storm at Great Fish Point, and the distended air-bladder was found to have filled almost the whole mouth. While bathybial forms are generally more or less cosmopolitan, it appears preferable to retain this new genus until such time as the oppor- tunity occurs to compare the genotype with Indian or Australian species. albofasciatus is very closely related to gangene, differing in fin formulae, in certain dimensional relationships, and in the absence of supra-orbital tentacles. This latter difference may prove to be sexual, and it is not unlikely that the two may prove to be conspecific. I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of the South African Museum, for his kind assistance and for the loan of literature. Also to the Carnegie Research Fund (through the Research Grant Board of South Africa) for financial assistance. ALBANY Museum, GRAHAMSTOWN, October 1933. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXIT. Plate ¥. A. Scolopsis vosmeri (Bloch.). B. Batrichthys albofasciatus n.g. et sp. C, Schedophilus medusophagus Cocco. Neill & Co., Lid. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate VI. A. Papyrichthys pellucidus Liitken n.g. B. Grammonus opisthodon n. sp. C, Setarches giinthert Johnson. a, Preopercular spines on left side. Neill & Co., Ltd. 61. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Vol. XXII. Part IV. pp. 321-336. Pls. XVI—XXII1. December, 1934. THE TRIGLIDAE OF SOUTH AFRICA. By J. L. B. Smira. (With Plates XVI-XXIII and one Text-figure.) (Read May 16, 1934. Revised MS. received June 18, 1934.) Famity TRIGLIDAE. Four genera of this family are admitted by Barnard (Ann. S.A. Mus., 1925, vol. xxi, p. 938) to the South African fauna list, viz. Trigla Art., Peristedion Lac., Lepidotrigla Gnthr., and Chelidonichthys Kaup. An examination of the material in the collections of the South African Museum and of the Albany Museum indicated that a revision of the South African species of this family was necessary. A new sub-genus of Trigla, Trigloporus, and three new species, are described below. Key to the South African Genera. I. Lateral line without spines. A. Scales small to moderate, less than 70 in lateral line . Lepidotrigla. B. Scales very small, more than 70 in lateral line. . Chelidonichthys. II. Lateral line spinose. A. Body covered with bony plates, each bearing a spine. Preorbitals produced. . . . . . Peristedion. B. Body scaly. Preorbitals not produced. Whole body covered by a complex muciferous tube system. Lateral line scales with several spines. . . Trigla (Trigloporus). Genus LEPIDOTRIGLA Gnthr. 1925. Barnard, Ann. S.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 938. Body covered with scales of moderate size, ctenoid, or ctenoid above lower third of side, cycloid ventrally. Breast naked, or partly scaly. Lateral line bifurcates at caudal base, the branches extending on to the caudal lobes. Lateral line tubes with one long oblique dorsal and a similar ventral branch, and one to six intermediate smaller branches, each ending in a pore. | No spines on lateral line scales, which are somewhat larger than the 62 322 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. body scales, being vertically elongate. Teeth in jaws and usually on vomer; palatines edentate. Three free pectoral rays. A row of spinose plates along each side of the base of the dorsal fin. This diagnosis, where amended, is based upon South African material only. The species of this genus appear to be fairly numerous, but they have received relatively little attention from systematists, and the relationships o not appear to be well established. Of the features upon which differentiation may be based, the number and nature of the preorbital spines appear to be of special significance, but these have apparently received little attention, and they have not been described as minutely as they merit. The shape of the spinous dorsal is also of assistance, but is evidently somewhat variable even in one species, e.g. in natalensis G. and T. the 3rd spine varies from 1-0-1-2 times the length of the 2nd. The number of serrae on the Ist dorsal spine may also prove of assistance in differentiation. These fishes appear to be found below the 20-fathom line, and being of small size and relatively few in number, have at present no economic significance, in South Africa at least. All of our specimens have been obtained in Natal waters, and may ultimately be found in other parts of the Indo-Pacific area. The South African species first obtained and described by Gilchrist and Thompson (Ann. 8.A. Mus., 1914, vol. xiii, pp. 75, 76) were faurei and natalensis. Barnard (Ann. 8.A. Mus., 1925, vol. xxi, p. 938) later united these species under faurei, which has page-preference over natalensis. A careful study of the material believed to have been used by the original authors reveals that natalensis should be revived, but chiefly upon features not noticed by Gilchrist and Thompson. As will be shown below, it is not indeed certain that the specimen now described as faurei is one of those described by the original authors. A new species, multispinosus, well differentiated from our and from other Indo-Pacific species, has been added. Key to the South African Species. I. No keel on preopercle. Six or fewer preorbital spines. Pectorals longer than head. A. A patch of scales on breast. Two outer preorbital spines abruptly longer than the subequal inner spines . . faurei. B. Breast naked. Two outer preorbital spines not abruptly longer than the graduated inner spines. . . . natalensis. Ii. A strong keel on lower margin of preopercle. Ten or more spines on each preorbital. Pectorals shorter than head . - multispinosus. 63 The Triglidae of South Africa. 323 In the following descriptions “length of head” is the distance from the hind margin of the upper portion of the opercular flap (i.e. excluding the projecting portion of the opercular spine) to the tip of the longest preorbital spine. This is in most cases practically the same as the distance from the hind margin of the opercular flap to the mid-point of the snout between the preorbital extensions, measured obliquely. Total length is measured from the tip of the longest preorbital spine to the apex of the mid-caudal rays. Lepidotrigla faurer G. and T. (Plate XVI, A; Plate XVIII, A; Plate XIX, A, C.) 1914. Gilchrist and Thompson, Ann. §.A. Mus., vol. xiii, p. 75. 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 938. Depth 4-1, length of head 3-1 in length of body. Eye 3-9, interorbital 4-9, snout (to tip of preorbital spine) 2-6, distance between apices of longest preorbital spines 3-5 in head. Dorsal profile of snout steep, almost straight. Snout between the projecting preorbitals scarcely emarginate. Pre- orbitals each with 6 spines, the outer 2 large, subequal in length, the inner 4 subequal, very abruptly smaller than the outer (Pl. XVIII, A). No preopercular spine or keel. Two inconspicuous spines on supero- anterior margin of orbit. A short transverse groove at the supero-posterior margin of each orbit. Nuchal spines feeble, reach beyond the base of the 3rd dorsal spine. Opercular and humeral spines moderate. Jaws with bands of small conical teeth. Vomerine teeth doubtful. Palatines edentate. Pyloric caeca cannot be determined as the intestines have decomposed. Seven gill-rakers plus several rudiments. D VIII+16, inserted above the hinder third of the opercular flap. Ist, 2nd, and 3rd spines serrate, 38 serrae on Ist spine, those on 3rd spine very small. Ist spine 2-0, 2nd 1-7, 3rd 1-6 in length of head. 4th-6th dorsal rays longest; 5th ray 1-9 in head, 5-7 in length of body; 14th ray 2-3 in head, 7-0 in length of body. 14th ray laid back just reaches upper margin of caudal base. A 16, inserted below the soft dorsal origin. Lower than soft dorsal. P 11+3, 1-13 times head, 2°75 in length of body ; tip reaches to below the base of the 7th dorsal ray, and to below the 29th lateral line scale. First upper and lower three of connected rays simple. Longest free ray 1:3 in head, tip does not reach ventral tip. Ventrals 1-2 in head, reach to base of 3rd anal ray. Caudal slightly emarginate, peduncle 1-4 times eye. Scales moderate, ctenoid. dorsally to level of humeral spine, graduated into cycloid on ventral area (Pl. XIX, A and C). Lateral line scales 60; 64 324 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. tubes with 3-8 branches, longest above and below. No pores on body. 22 spines along dorsal base. Breast with a median patch of moderate cycloid scales. | Colour.—Preserved, uniform red-brown. Inner surface of pectorals dark, with light margin above and below. Length.—143 mm. (S.A. Mus., No. 11803). Locality.—Natal, off Tugela mouth, in 20-63 fathoms. In the South African Museum are eight adult specimens of Lepidotrigla, these having been registered as the material, collected by the s.s. “‘ Pieter Faure,” upon which Gilchrist and Thompson based their diagnoses of faurea and of natalensis. These eight specimens have the following numbers, lengths, etc.:— S.A.M. No. . . | 11797 | 11797 | 11797 | 11803 | 11812 | 11812 | 11812 | 11812 Total length . | 178 | 174 | 160 | 143 | 167 | 162 | 155 | 135 Body length . | 154 | 149 | 134 | 120 | 144 | 136 | 1380 | 120 Dorsal spines . 9 9 8 8 9 8 8 8 According to the South African Museum register, two of the three of No. 11797, plus No. 11803, are Gilchrist and Thompson’s orthotypes of faurei, and one of those of No. 11812 is the holotype of natalensis. According to Gilchrist and Thompson (loc. cit.), the three types of faurei were of length 120 mm., 120 mm., and 146 mm. None of the above are as small as 120 mm., unless these authors recorded body and not total length. Otherwise, some of their measurements were erroneous, or there has been a loss of specimens. In the case of natalensis the holotype was stated to be 120 mm. in length, and it is possibly the smallest of those of No. 11812. In any case, there has obviously been some lack of care in the designation and pre- servation of Gilchrist and Thompson’s orthotypes, which is particularly regrettable in the present case, since a careful study of the eight specimens reveals that No. 11803 is well differentiated from the remaining seven, which are undoubtedly conspecific. The original descriptions of fauret and of natalensis reveal nothing of significance whereby these two species may be distinguished from each other. L. faurei was stated to have “two strong spines” on each pre- orbital, and ctenoid scales, and natalensis to have “a row of strong spines” on each preorbital, and cycloid scales. None of the eight South African Museum specimens have only two preorbital spines, but in No. 11803 the two outer are very abruptly longer than the subequal inner spines (Pl. XVIII, A). In none of the remaining 65 The Trighdae of South Africa. | 325 seven specimens are the two outer spines so abruptly differentiated from the inner (Pl. XVIII, Band C). Further, in all of the specimens, the scales above the lateral line are ctenoid, but cycloid on the ventral surface. It is therefore impossible to select with certainty the orthotypes of Gilchrist and Thompson, but there is no alternative except to revive natalensis. In view of the nature of the preorbital spines of No. 11803, this (a ripe female) is here designated the holotype of faurei, and the remaining seven specimens (male and female) listed above may be designated the lectotypes of natalensis, or, alternatively, No. 11812 of length 135 mm. might be selected as the orthotype. L. fauret is well differentiated from natalensis not only by the nature of the preorbital spines, but also by the presence of scales on the breast, and by the longer pectorals and soft dorsal rays. The scales of fawres are more strongly denticulate than equivalent scales of natalensis. It is, however, remarkable that among over 50 juvenile specimens, taken with these eight adults, none show any signs of a scaly breast, and should no further specimens of fawrei (as here defined) be discovered, it may be suspected that it is merely an abnormal specimen of the form now recognised as natalensis. Lepidotrigla natalensis G. and T. (Plate XVI, B; Plate XVIII, B, C; Plate XIX, B, D, H, F.) 1914. Gilchrist and Thompson, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xii, p. 76. 1925. Barnard, Ann. §.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 938 ( faures part ?). Depth 4-0-5-0, length of head 3-0—-3-2 in length of body. Eye 3-4—4-0, interorbital 4-0-5-0, snout (to tip of preorbital spine) 2-2-2-5, distance between apices of longest preorbital spines 3-2-3-7 in head. Dorsal profile of snout steep, almost straight. Snout between the projecting preorbitals almost straight to emarginate. Preorbitals each with 4-6 spines, the outer the largest, graduated to the inner, no abrupt change in size (Pl. XVIII, B and C). The form and arrangement of these spines are somewhat variable, and some specimens have 1-2 outer smaller spines at the base of the largest. In very young specimens there are rarely more than 2-3 spines visible, and these are highly incurved, as if the spinose preorbital extension develops from the inner side with growth. No marked pre- opercular spine in adults; a small pungent spine in very young specimens, which becomes more or less obsolete with growth. No preopercular keel. Two inconspicuous spines on supero-anterior margin of orbit; there are 2-3 moderately prominent spines in juveniles which diminish with growth. A short transverse groove at the supero-posterior margin of each orbit, obscured on one or both sides in some specimens by an outgrowth of the VOL. XXII, PART IV. 23 66 326 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. bony integument. Nuchal spines fairly strong, reach from almost below to beyond the base of the 8rd dorsal spine. Opercular and humeral spines moderate. Jaws and vomer with bands of small conical teeth. Palatines edentate. Gill-rakers 7-9 plus several rudiments. Pyloric caeca 6-8. D VIII-IX +16, inserted above the hinder third of the operculum. Ist, 2nd, and 3rd spines serrate, 42-46 serrae on first spine, those on 3rd very small. 1st spine 1-7-2:1, 2nd 1-6-1-8, 3rd 1-5-1-7 in length of head. 3rd spine 1:03-1-2 times second. 4th-6th dorsal rays longest; 5th ray 2-1-2:5 in head, 6-2-7-0 in length of body. 14th ray 2-6-2-7 in head, 8-0-8-6 in length of body. 14th ray when laid back does not reach the upper margin of the caudal base. A 16, inserted below origin of soft dorsal, shape similar to that of soft dorsal, but rays shorter. P 11+3, 1-0-1-08 times head, 3-0-3-2 in length of body, tip reaches to below the base of the 3rd—5th dorsal ray, and to below the 24th-25th lateral line scale. First upper and lower three of connected rays simple. Longest free ray 1-4 in head, does not reach ventral tip. Ventrals 1-1—-1-2 in head, reach origin of anal or just beyond. Caudal slightly emarginate, peduncle 1-2—1-4 times eye. Scales moderate, weakly ctenoid dorsally to level of humeral spine, graduated into cycloid on ventral area (Pl. XIX, B, D, and E). Lateral line scales 58-61, tubes with 3-6 branches, with longest above and below (Pl. XIX, F). Sometimes a few pores on body, most marked ventrally, occasional scales perforated. 23-25 spines along dorsal base. Breast naked. Colour.—Preserved, uniform red-brown. Inner portion of pectorals dark with light margin above and below. Length.—35-178 mm. Localhity.— Natal, off Tugela mouth, up to 63 fathoms. Lepidotrigla multispinosus n. sp. (Plates XVII and XX.) Dorsal profile of snout undulate, abruptly descending, concave before eyes, convex on anterior part, with abrupt descent at tip. Depth 4, length of head 3-1 in length of body. Eye 4-0, interorbital 4-8, snout 2-0, postorbital part of head 3-1 in length of head. Rostrals, with slight, widely diverging, medio-longitudinal ridge, length 11 in head (measured between parallels of mid-point of snout and tip of process). At the apex are small spines, mostly invested; on the left process there are 5 small outer spines and 12 inner, the first (outer) 67 The Triglidae of South Africa. 327 of the 12 by far the largest; on the right are 10 spines, with the outer longest (Pl. XVII, C). Distance between the apices of the longest rostral spines 3 in head. Lateral keel of preorbital very faint, ending below and not continuous with the preopercular ridge. A distinct ridge on lower margin of preopercle, 1:3 times eye, slightly oblique downwards to the angle, at which there is no spine. Two weak spines above the anterior part of the orbit; one larger above the hind margin. On each side one weak occipital, and two nuchal spines, the hinder the larger; apex of this just reaches the base of the 3rd dorsal spine. Interorbital deeply concave. The granules on the cheek radiate fan-wise backwards from below the front margin of the eye; similarly on the*opercle from the base of the spine. On the preorbital the arrangement is irregular. A short deep groove at the supero-posterior margin of the orbit continuous, angularly bent back- wards across the occiput. Humeral spine 3, free distal portion 6 in head. Mouth sub-inferior, lower jaw included, maxilla 2-6 in head. Villiform teeth in bands in both jaws, wider in upper jaw. Vomerine teeth doubtful. None on other bones. Tongue adnate. Large pores on lower surface of mandibles. No barbels. Branchiostegals 7. Membranes free from isthmus. Gill-rakers 5, longest 5 in eye, plus 4 anterior rudiments. Pyloric caeca 6, moderate. D VIII+15, inserted above the hind margin of the operculum. Ist spine 2-1, 2nd and 3rd subequal, 1-8 in head. 1st spine with 24 anterior spinules, 2nd and 3rd weakly spinate. Base of Ist dorsal 1-8 in head. Longest soft ray (5th-8th) 3-5 in head. Base of soft dorsal 1-1 times head. On one side 23, on the other 25 spines below the dorsal. A 16, originates below the origin of the soft dorsal. P 11+38, 1:2 in head, reaches to below the base of the 7th dorsal ray. Longest (upper) free ray, reaches almost to ventral tip, 1-4 in head. V I, 5, reach to base of 3rd anal ray. Caudal almost truncate, peduncle twice eye. Scales (mostly shed) relatively small, ctenoid to below the pectoral base, ventral scales with a single large denticle (Pl. XX, A, B, and C). 1.1.59. Each tube with an upper and a lower oblique branch, and from one to four smaller intermediate branches, each ending in a pore (Pl. XX, D). Breast naked. Colour.—Preserved, uniform red-brown. Pectorals dark. Length.—160 mm. Type in the Albany Museum. This specimen was among certain fishes presented to the Albany Museum by the Director of the Government Fisheries Survey. It was without serial number or locality, although probably from Natal. It is very clearly distinct from our other species, the preopercular keel, 68 328 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. the number of the preorbital spines, the long peduncle, the smaller scales, and the relatively short 3rd dorsal spine being distinctive features. This species appears to be well differentiated from all others by several features, notably the deep excavation between the long multidentate preorbital extensions and by the preopercular keel. Genus CHELIDONICHTHYS Kaup. 1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 939. Scales very small. Three free pectoral rays. Palatines edentate. A row of spinose plates along the base of the dorsal fin. Lateral line without spines, bifurcating at the caudal base. Preorbitals produced into spines. Kurope, Africa, Japan, and Australia. This genus appears to be quite valid, but is apparently not recognised by some systematists. As far as the South African species are concerned, Barnard’s treatment requires no revision, the descriptions being in the main accurate and detailed, and the differentiations clearly defined. Key to the South. African Species. I. Breast naked. Preorbitals ending in several (usually incurved) spines. A. Eye not greater than interorbital width . . . . - capensis. B. Eye distinctly greater than interorbital width . . . . kumu. Il. Breast pitted. Preorbital ending in one large straight outer spine, with inner concealed fused spines. . . . . . . - quekettr. capensis C. and V. appears to be well differentiated from any European species, as indicated by Barnard (loc. cit.). This species is of moderate economic significance as a food-fish in South Africa. Fic. 1.—Preorbital spines of Chelidonichthys queketti Rgn. X =Inner fused spines, concealed by membrane. Barnard (loc. cit.) has compared our specimens of kumu L. and G. with Australian specimens, and his opinion that they are conspecific is here accepted. quekettt Rgn. is apparently an endemic species. Previous workers do not appear to have noticed that, besides the large outer preorbital spine, 69 The Triglidae of South Africa. 329 there is on each side, concealed within the basal skinny membrane, an inner process, which has obviously been produced by the coalescence of from four to eight smaller spines (fig. 1). Genus PERISTEDION Lac. 1895. Goode and Bean, Ocean Ichth., p. 470. 1913. Weber, Siboga Exp. Monogr. 57, p. 511. 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 944. Body covered with bony plates, each bearing a spine. Mouth inferior, lower jaw included, with barbels on the lower margin, the outer the longest. Kach preorbital greatly enlarged and produced forwards as a spatuliform process, with lateral keel continuous along lower margin of preopercle, which ends in a spine. No teeth. Dorsal single or divided. Two free pectoral rays. Two species have been found in our area, adent Lloyd, and what has hitherto (though with doubt by Barnard, loc. cit., p. 946) been accepted as gracile G. and B. This latter species has now been found not to be conspecific with gracile, and is here described as webert n. sp. Many other species will doubtless be found in our area with more intensive collecting, and it is not unlikely that at least some of the relatively numerous Indo-Pacific forms will be among them. Key to the South African Species. I. No spines on dorsal surface of snout. 1.1. 34 . . . . webert. II. One median and 4 smaller spines on dorsal surface of snout. 1.1. 30 . adeni. Peristedion weberi Nn. Sp. (Plate X XI.) 1924. Gilchrist and von Bonde, Fish. Mar. Surv. spec. Rep. ui, p. 22 (gracile). 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 945 (gracile ?). Dorsal profile abruptly descending before upper half of eye, thereafter slopes more gently. Depth 5-4 (5-0), length of head including rostral process 2:4 (2-1), rostral process 8-5 (7:5) in length of body. (The figure in brackets gives length in distance from base of caudal to tip of maxilla.) Eye 5:5 (4-2), snout 2-9 (2-2), snout plus rostral process 1-6 (1-2), rostral process 3-5 (2-7), interorbital width 6-5 (5:0) in length of head (including rostral process; the figure in brackets is length in length of head without rostral process). Interorbital deeply concave, supraorbital ridge moderate, terminating © —70 330 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. in a flat spine, followed by two retrorse spines. A small serrated suborbital keel terminating in a feeble blunt spinose projection. The widely diverging rostral processes are continued backwards as serrated ridges, each ter- minating at the angle of the preopercle, hind margin scarcely acute (PI. XXI, Band C). No nasal or frontal spines. No spine at base of rostral process. Numerous pores on head and along lower edge of mandible. 8-9 groups of bi- or trifid barbels on each side of the lower jaw, longest fimbriate, equal to orbit. (Pl. XXI, A, pencilled in on photograph.) Maxilla 1-5 times eye. No teeth in jaws or on palate. Tongue adnate. Gill-rakers 20, longest 2:5 in eye. 30 spinose plates on dorsal, 28 on ventral surface. The anterior ventral plates are 2-3 times as long as broad, 7.e. the width of the two plates is 1:15 in the length of one plate (Pl. XXI, D). A rectangular portion of the second plates, five times wider than long, fits into a recess in the anterior plates. D VIII, 20, originates an eye-diameter behind eye, above the hind margin of the operculum. 4th spine longest. Ist spine 3-5, 2nd and 3rd subequal 3-2, 4th 2-9 in length of head (without rostral process). Ist ray 0:4, 2nd 4-3, 3rd 3-6, 4th-8th longest 3-2 in length of head (without rostral process); thereafter the rays decrease. A 20 (or I, 19), inserted below the base of the 4th dorsal ray. Shape and length of raysasin dorsal. Base of anal 5-6 times longitudinal diameter of eye. P 11+2, 2:2, longer detached ray 1-6, lower 1:8 in head (without rostral process). Upper detached ray reaches well beyond ventral tip. Ventrals 1-9 in head (without rostral process) reach to vent. Membrane for-half-length of last ray joined to body. Caudal emarginate, mid-rays 1-1 times eye. The lateral line descends abruptly from the shoulder to the middle of the side. 34 spinose plates in the lateral line, 4 of these on the downward portion. Lateral line tubes bifurcate, ending in a pore above and a pore below the spine (Pl. XXI, E). The spines on the anterior 23 plates are simple, those on the 11 posterior plates have an anterior antrorse and a posterior retrorse point (Pl. XXI, E). Colour.—Preserved, uniform light brown. Traces of dark mottling on distal half of pectoral. Length.—185 mm. Locahity.— Off Delagoa Bay, in 260 fathoms. Type in the Albany Museum. A single specimen, labelled P. gracile G. and B., presented to the Albany Museum by the Director of Fisheries Survey. According to the Fisheries Survey records (Mar. Bio. Rep., 1921. (2), p. 10), 8 specimens, subsequently identified as Peristedion gracile G. and B. 71 The Triglidae of South Africa. 331 (Gilchrist and von Bonde, Mar. Bio. Rep., 1924, 11, p. 22), were obtained off Delagoa Bay, in 260 fathoms; the specimen described above was one of these. : | Barnard (loc. cit., p. 947) was very doubtful of the validity of this identification, chiefly because gracile is'a Mexican species. This has led me to make a critical examination of the specimen in the Albany Museum. The original description of gracile (Goode and Bean, Ocean. Ichth., 1896, p. 473, fig. 387) is based upon a single type specimen about 125 mm. in length. (There are several discrepancies in this description.) Although reasonably close to gracile, the specimen described above is evidently not conspecific. The shape of the spinous dorsal, the longer anal base, the bispinose posterior lateral line plates, and the number of plates, as well as the ridge below the eye, all distinguish the present specimen from gracile. There are also fewer gill-rakers, but Goode and Bean may possibly have given the number (26) on the whole arch. The original description of gracile does not say whether the rostral processes are divergent, but the two species have much in common. This is another case of remark- ably close relationship between Indo-Pacific and Atlantic species. weber is also related to rivers-andersoni Alcock, and to nierstraszt Weber, from the Indo-Pacific. I have seen only the original description and figures of the former species (Alcock, 1894, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, xii, pt. 2, p. 12, pl. vi, figs. 2, 2a, 2b). Dr. de Beaufort of Amsterdam has kindly lent me one of the co-types of the latter species. An examination of this indicates that nierstraszi is of doubtful validity, since the specimen agrees in most particulars with the description of rwers-andersonz, especially if the difference in size between the types of the two species be taken into account, e.g. the posterior lateral line plates of this specimen of nierstraszt are bispinose, and there is a small but distinct spine on the dorsal surface of the base of each rostral process. Since I have not seen a specimen of rivers-andersons, [| cannot venture to state that nierstraszi is conspecific, although it appears quite possible. In any case weberi is quite definitely distinct from either, in the nature of the more slender and diverging rostral processes alone. In regard to gracile, it would not indeed be surprising if a re-examination of that species showed that weberi is even more closely related than appears here. It is highly probable that gracile actually has bispinose posterior lateral line plates. Peristedion adeni Lloyd. (Plate XXII.) 1907. Lloyd, Rec. Ind. Mus., vol. i, p. 8. 1908. Alcock, Illustr. Zool. Invest. Fishes, pl. xl, figs. 1, la. 72 332 Transactions of the Royal Soctety of South Africa. 1922. Gilchrist, Fish. Mar. Surv. Spec. Rep. iu, p. 78. 1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 945. 21925. Fowler, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., vol. Ixxvii, p. 256. Dorsal profile of snout gently sloping before eye, scarcely concave. Depth 5-1, length of head (without rostral process) 2-6, (with rostral process) 2-2 in length of body (without rostral process). Eye 5-5, interorbital width 4-7, snout (with rostral process) 1-4, (without rostral process) 1-7, rostral process (broken) about 6 in length of head (excluding rostral process). Interorbital moderately concave, supraorbital ridges moderate, with a moderate spine on the posterior margin. On each side of the nape a large spine, and a smaller one below. One median frontal spine. On each side one small antorbital and one small nasal spine. The preorbital process is large, flattened, with inner edges subparallel, outer margins converging; the outer margins produced meet at an angle of 30°. Width of process at base 1-2 in eye. The lateral edge of the preorbital process is continued backwards as an undulate keel, terminating in the large pre- opercular spine (Pl. XXII, B). There isa short and narrow suborbital keel. Mouth large, maxilla 2:2 times eye. No teeth, tongue adnate. On each side of the lower jaw there are 7-8 single small barbels, and one large outer, fimbriate, 2-8 times eye. Gill-rakers 17, longest 3 in eye, anterior rakers short but graduated. 21 spinose plates on ventral, 24 on dorsal surface. The anterior ventral plates are together 1-1 times wider than the length, i.e. each plate is 1-8 times longer than wide (Pl. XXII, C). 2nd plates each slightly wider than long. A quadrangular portion of the 2nd plates, five times wider than long, fits into a recess in the anterior plates. D VII+15, inserted above hind margin of opercle, 3rd spine longest, 3-1 in head (without rostral process). 18 spinose plates along base. A 15, inserted below the base of the 2nd dorsal ray, base five times longitudinal diameter of eye. P11+2, 1-9, upper detached ray 2-6 in head (without rostral process). Tip of pectorals reaches to below the 11th lateral line plate. Ventrals 2-0 in head (without rostral process), just reach vent. Mem- brane joined to body. Caudal damaged. The lateral line descends abruptly from the shoulder to the middle of the side. 30 lateral line plates, 5 of these on the downward portion. The anterior 20 unispinose, the next 7 bispinose, and the last 3 unispinose (Pl. XXII, D). The lateral line pores do not show externally. Colour.—Preserved, uniform light brown, pectorals darker. Length.—About 225 mm. 73 The Trighdae of South Africa. 333 Locality.— Natal. A single specimen (S.A.M., No. 16223, from Mr. Bell Marley). The specimen described above was identified as adent Lloyd by Dr. Barnard (loc. cit.), with which identification I am provisionally in agreement. There are, however, certain variations from the original diagnosis, the most marked of which is the presence of the mid-posterior bispinose lateral line plates. These are not as obvious as in the species (webert) previously described, and may have escaped notice. The original description makes no mention of the antorbital and nasal spines. Barnard (loc. cit.) mentions these, but does not draw attention to the fact that they were not present in the type diagnosis. In this specimen the outer margins of the preorbital processes would meet at a more acute angle than those of the type, 1.e. they are less markedly convergent, but this feature is not of importance, and might vary con- siderably. Further, there is no mention of the suborbital keel which is present in this specimen. These combined differences might, if established, justify the separation of the present specimen from adeni, but as I have not access to any type of that species, it would be unwise to venture this step. Genus Tricia Art. 1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 943. Body covered with very small scales, ctenoid above, cycloid on ventral surface. Three free pectoral rays. Lateral line scales spinose. A row of spinose plates along the base of the dorsal fin. No palatine teeth. Lateral line bifurcates at the caudal base. Trigloporus new sub-genus. Distinguished from Trigla (sensu stricto) by the whole body (excepting the chest) being covered with a complex system of reticulate tubes (each ending in a pore), between rectilinear transverse multiporose tubes, as well as by the multispinate nature of the lateral line scales. The pectorals are also probably longer than in Trigla (Trigla). Kurope and Africa. Genotype, africana n. sp. This sub-genus is proposed with considerable doubt as to its validity, since I have seen, besides lineata Gmel., only one other Kuropean species of Trigla (sensu lato), viz. gurnardus Linn. The extraordinarily highly developed mucus canal system of lineata and of africana (which are clearly congeneric in all respects), as well as the spination of the lateral line scales, would appear to justify full generic distinction of the latter two species 74 334 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. from gurnardus. Against this, however, is an account of the species of Trigla by Smitt (Skand. Fish., 1892, pt. 1, p. 194), of which I have seen a brief abstract, in which he states that the species of this genus show practically all stages of development of the mucus canal system intermediate between that of gurnardus and that of lineata. Despite this, the difference between these species is very striking, but since material to establish or refute the absolute accuracy of Smitt’s statement is not available, as a compromise, T'rigloporus is proposed as a sub-genus of Trigla. Trigla (Trigloporus) africana n. sp. (Plate XXIII.) 1925. Barnard, loc. cit., p. 943 (lineata Gmel.). Dorsal profile of snout fairly steep, gently concave. Depth 4-5-5, length of head 3-5-3-7 in length of body. Eye 4-3-4-5, interorbital 4-0-4:5, snout 2-2, postorbital part of head 2-5, preorbital depth 2-4—2-5 in length of head (measured from the hind edge of the operculum at the spine to the snout tip). Front of snout rounded, or with slight median concavity. The preorbitals are not produced, and there are no obvious spinules. Interorbital deeply concave. Two to four backwardly radiating antero- supraorbital ridges, each ending above the orbital margin in a small spine. One to three minute supero-postorbital spinate ridges, without any cross groove behind. One to three nuchal spines, the infero-posterior the longest, just reaches below the base of the Ist dorsal spine. Humeral spine very short, apex reaches beyond the hind margin of the operculum, a distance equal to 5-5-6-2 in head. No keel on preorbital, the lower edge of which is scarcely serrate. One set of backwardly radiating granules from anterior margin of preorbitals; three radiating sets on cheek, lower above end of maxilla, median largest in centre of cheek, and a smaller group below hind margin of eye. Preopercular and opercular spines very feeble. | Maxilla extends to below the hind margin of the eye. No vomerine teeth. The pores on the lower surface of the rami are arranged in 5-6 more or less regular longitudinal series, close set, but not aggregated into groups. D X+15-16, inserted above slightly in advance of hind margin of operculum. Ist spine 1-4-1-5, 2nd, longest, 1-3-1-4, 3rd 1-4-1-5 in head. Ist spine with a few rudimentary spinules or granules on the lower anterior edge. Soft rays 2-5 in head. A 15-16, inserted below the soft dorsal, rays similar to dorsal. Pectorals 1-25-1-3 times head; tip reaches to below the 4th—5th dorsal 75 The Trighidae of South Africa. 335 ray. Longest free ray 1-1-1-2 in head, tip reaches to the posterior third of the ventral. | Ventrals 1-0-1:2 times head, reach to the base of the 2nd—4th anal ray. | Scales very small, strongly ctenoid above the lateral line (Pl. XXIII, C), grade into cycloid on ventral surface. The whole of the body is covered with the reticulate system of mucus canals described earlier, the transverse rectilinear tubes resembling lateral folds of the skin between the scale rows (Pl. XXIII, B). 67-70 scales in the lateral line, each scale bearing 2-5 spines, each much smaller than the single spine on the lateral line scales of the species gurnardus Linn. Breast partly or wholly scaly. Gill-rakers 7-8. Pyloric caeca 7-9. Colour.—Red-brown, mottled and spotted, with 4-7 faint cross-bars. Spinous and soft dorsal and caudal with irregular blotches. Ventrals reddish. Pectorals bluish, with irregular cross-mottlings; free rays with several brownish blotches. Length.—Up to 230 mm. Localities.—Cape St. Blaize, 26-33 fathoms; Algoa Bay, 40 fathoms; Port Alfred, cast up on the shore. Holotype, from Port Alfred, in the Albany Museum. The South African specimens have hitherto been regarded as identical with the European species lineata Gmelin. Since I had access to no recent detailed descriptions of that species, I forwarded a specimen of our species to Mr. Norman of the British Museum, requesting him to compare it with the European form, and, if there appeared any doubt of conspecificity, to send me material for comparison. He has kindly sent this, and there appears to be little doubt that the South African species is well differentiated. The following table indicates some of the numerous features by which the two species are differentiated :— | lineata africana. Pectoral times head _. ; ; 1-6 1-2-1:3 Humeral spine in head . ; ; 3-4 5-5-6-2 Eye in head ; ; ; ; 3°4 4-3-4:5 Pores on rami ; ; , . | In groups of 5-6 | In uniform rows Breast ; ; . Naked Scaly Lower margin of preorbitals ; ; Serrate Smooth Dorsal spines ; 12 10 Anterior margin of first dorsal spine | Serrate whole Feebly serrate length basally 76 336 Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Besides these, the dorsal profile of the snout of lineata is much steeper, and the angle subtended by the corners of the mouth at the symphysis is much less than in our species, while the spination and granulations on the head of lineata are much more marked than in africana, and the spinous dorsal is markedly larger. I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barnard, Assistant Director of the South African Museum, for the very considerable assistance he continually affords me in providing extracts from literature not available here, as well as for freely lending material from the South African Museum collection. Also to the Carnegie Research Fund, through the Research Grant Board of South Africa, for generous financial assistance. ALBANY MUSEvuM, GRAHAMSTOWN, June 1934. Plate XVI. pue “WH K) sisuappyou njbr.uopideT L squosoider oinsy yore MOTEq SUI] OI, ze "L pue 0 rainof op br.yoprdaT V Neill & Co., Lid, J. L. B. Smith. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. J. iL. B. Smith, Afr., Vol. XXII. | . HE Plate XVII. Neill & Co., Ltd. C. Preorbital spines. B. Dorsal view of head. The line below each figure represents 1 cm. (Type.) Ispinasus N. sp. A. Lepidotrigla mult rans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXTI. Plate XVIII. Preorbital spines, x 5, of Lepidotrigla species: . fauret G. and T. B and C. natalensis G. and T., showing limits of variation. J. iL. B. Smith. Veill d Co., Ltd Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. ‘i - : ‘ ih \ ' i “ ‘ iN 4 \ a Plate XIX. ‘ Scales of Lepidotrigla species: A. Above lateral line, below spinous dorsal, of faure: G. and T. B. Equivalent scale of natalensis G. and T. C. Ventral, behind breast, of faurer G. and T. The line below each scale J. L. B. Smith. D. Equivalent scale of natalensis G. and T. E. From behind pectoral base of natalensis G. and T. F. 31st lateral line scale of same. represents 1 mm. Neill & Co., Lid. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8S. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate XX Scales of Lepidotrigla multispinosus n. sp. A. Above lateral line, below spinous dorsal. _ C. Ventral, behind breast. B. Behind pectoral base. D. 30th lateral line scale. The line below each scale represents 1 mm. J. L. B. Smith. Neill & Co., Ltd. Plate X XI. ni Ha Reet wana A. Peristedion weberi n. sp. D. Anterior ventral plates. B. Ventral surface. KE. 21st (right)-27th lateral line spines from above. C. Dorsal view of head. The line with each figure represents 1 cm. J, LL. B. Smith. Veill & Co., Ltd. Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. Plate XXII A. Peristedion adeni Lloyd. C. Anterior ventral plates. B. Dorsal view of head. D. 20th (right)—24th lateral line spines from above. The line below each figure represents | cm. J. LL. B. Smith. Neill & Co., Lid. Trans Roy. Soc. 8. Afr., Vol. XXII. J. L. B. Smith, Plate XXIII, Neill & Co., Lid, B. A portion of the skin below the lateral line, showing a few lateral line scales. The line below B and below C represents 1 mm. i (Type.) ° S1IZe e Nat 1cana Nn. sp. Trigla (Trigloporus) afr C. Scale from below the spinous dorsal, above the lateral line. A. 77. Annals of the South African Museum. Vol. XXX. Part 5. pp. 587-644. Pls. XV—XXII. February, 1935. 19. The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa.—By J. L. B. SMITH, M.Se., Ph.D., Hon. Curator of Fishes, Albany Museum, Grahamstown. (With Plates XV-XXII and 17 Text-figures.) [Members of the family Mugilidae—known in South Africa as ‘‘ Harders’’—are an important edible commodity. Pappe refers to their value, and an enthusiastic praise of them occurs in the memoirs of Lady Anne Barnard. From the culinary point of view one species of Harder appears to be as good as another, but for scientific purposes it is important to have the species occurring in our waters defined as accurately as possible. In this paper Dr. J. L. B. Smith—a worthy successor of Dr. Andrew Smith in the early part of last century—has tackled a very difficult problem in systematics, which previous writers have left severely alone.—Ep.] Family MUGILIDAE. The South African species all fall within the single wide genus Mugil Linn. | Genus Mueix Linn. 1861. Giinther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. i, p. 409, and p. 466 (Myzus). 1884. Jordan and Swain, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. vii, p. 261 (Liza). 1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, vol. iv, p. 78. 1920. Athanassoupoulos, Ann. Mus. Civ. Genoa (3), vol. viii, p. 254 ff. 1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fish. Indo-Aust. Archip., vol. iv, p. 229, and p. 264 (Myzxus). 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 302, and p. 311 (Myzxus), and p. 1023. Body elongate, sub-cylindrical, more or less compressed posteriorly. Head usually somewhat depressed, more or less cuneiform in trans- verse section, with rounded apex below, generally completely scaly. Scales usually ctenoid, sometimes cycloid, ventral scales more markedly denticulate. Sometimes a secondary cycloid squamation in the investing integument of the scales. No lateral line, but most scales with one or more pits or canals, sometimes more numerous on dorsal scales. Mouth small, terminal or sub-inferior, protractile. Maxilla almost or entirely hidden beneath preorbital, excluded from margin of upper jaw. Upper lip narrow or fleshy, with or without VOL. XXX, PART 5. 40 78 588 Annals of the South African Museum. papillae. Minute recurved teeth, generally compressed and apically dilated, unicuspid, tricuspid, or spatulate, in one or more rows 1n upper jaw, present or absent. Very minute slender pointed teeth in lower jaw rarely present. Villiform teeth present or absent on vomer, palatines, pterygoids, and tongue. The buccal membrane sometimes with apically dilated cilia. A transverse concavity before the vomer, obscured in some species. Tongue adnate to floor of mouth. Eyes fairly large, usually with adipose eyelids, rudimentary or highly developed, better developed in adults. Two dorsal fins; the first, of 4 pungent spines, with a pointed basal scaly process inserted near middle of body, membrane from last ray joined to body. Second dorsal of 1 weak spine and 7-10 rays, inserted above last fourth of body. Anal of 3 weak spines and 8-11 rays, inserted below second dorsal. Pectorals inserted slightly or considerably above middle of side, more or less falcate, with or without an elongate scaly axillary process. Ventrals abdominal, joined by a membrane to the body and to one another. An elongate cuneiform interventral scaly process. Caudal feebly emarginate to forked. Fins, except first dorsal, more or less scaly. Third and fourth upper pharyngeals fused, enlarged, with con- voluted adipose base. Giull-openings wide, membranes separate, free from isthmus. Gill-rakers very numerous, long and close-set; lower pharyngeal rakers functional. Stomach tough and muscular, gizzard- like; pyloric caeca few. Mugil sensu lato is one of the earliest described genera of fishes, but the natural relationships of the species appear to be but poorly understood, and more or less unsatisfactory division of the wide genus has several times been proposed. Myzxus Guthr. (loc. cit.) was proposed for species with teeth in the jaws, and (sometimes?) on the palate. The validity of this differ- entiation has been accepted or rejected by systematists without precise definition of the criteria upon which they base their opinions. It is even not unusual to find an author stating that specimens of Mugil sensu stricto (i.e. accepting Myrus) have teeth in the jaws. Further, systematists frequently imply that teeth are absent from the palatal bones of certain species, whereas even a casual examination of their specimens would reveal that teeth are present. The inaccuracy of many statements about the dentition is probably in part due to the relatively small mouth of Mugil species, which renders the examination of the palatal bones, especially in small 719 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 589 and preserved specimens, a troublesome matter. In illustration may be quoted the fact that I have found no mention of lingual teeth, which are by no means infrequently present. In the South African species there appear to be all degrees between the entire absence of teeth, and the state where most of the normally dentigerous bones are fully dentate. Many of our species have teeth in the jaws, and on the palatal bones, at least as well developed as those present in, e.g., Elops Linn. In this latter genus the mouth is large. In so far as our species are concerned, division of Mugil sensu lato on the nature of the dentition alone would be not only of question- able value, but also exceedingly difficult to define and justify. It is not unlikely that this may well apply to all cases where Myzxus has been recognised. Jordan and Swain (loc. cit.) have proposed the genus Liza for species which do not possess adipose eyelids (genotype: capito Cuv.), while to Mugil sensu stricto are assigned those with eyelids. It has already been pointed out by Jacot (Sci. Rep. Tohok. Imp. Univ., 1930, vol. v, No. 4, p. 827) that division on this feature is of doubtful value, since there is to be found almost every degree between obsolete and fully developed eyelids. Further, it may be indicated that adipose eyelids are, sometimes at least, better developed in the adult than in the juvenile stadia, and, also that as far as the South African species are concerned, the adults of all possess definite, if not always highly developed, eyelids. | It may be noted that species (such as cephalus Linn.) which possess well developed eyelids probably always have an edentate vomer, fairly concave anteriorly, while the transverse concavity anterior to the vomer is not usually obscured (all of the American species of Mugil appear to be of this type). These differences are nowhere constant and sharp, nor can they be considered as a basis upon which the genus may be divided. As far as the South African species are concerned, it would be exceedingly difficult to justify the separation of the three with well developed eyelids from the remainder, and I do not propose to attempt it. (But see note on scaling of cephalus, p. 19.) No representatives of the closely related genera Agonostomus Benn. and Cestraeus C. and V., appear to have been found in ourarea. The latter at least appears to be well differentiated from Mugil. The majority of museum collections of Mugil species appear to be in a somewhat chaotic state, and few systematists care to undertake positive identifications upon which reliance may be placed. 80 590 Annals of the South African Museum. The early descriptions are hardly ever of real diagnostic value, and the diagnoses of many species cannot be anything but provisional. Added to this, differentiation between the species of this genus has proved to be one of the most difficult problems which face the system- atist; many of the features which in other groups provide a basis for differentiation here appear to vary little between the different species. The habits and environment of the different species show little variation. It is found that such cases of obscured differentia- tion sometimes occur in genera in which there is this uniformity of habit and of habitat (e.g. Hpinephelus Blch.). In recent literature there is a general tendency to reduce the number of nominal species of Mugil. At the same time, it is remark- able that the differentiation of those closely related is still frequently based chiefly upon features, which can, by the examination of large numbers of specimens, be shown to vary widely within any one, and to overlap between related, species. The present confusion may be attributed partly to the fact that where ordinary features have apparently failed to show differentiation between what have quite obviously been different species, systematists have assigned a purely fictitious value to characters which are inconstant and unreliable. The depth of the body, and of the caudal peduncle, the position of insertion of the pectorals, and too restricted and undefined limits for scale-counts, are, among others, comparatively useless features in this genus. On the other hand, it is singular to find how many most significant characters have been entirely overlooked. The nature of the scales and of the teeth are of importance, but have not received the attention they merit. The changes which take place with increase in size have not been properly considered, and many nominal species may prove to be merely different stadia of others. It is remarkable that the highly characteristic form of the ventral fins has not, in so far as I can determine, been regarded as worthy of special description. This is a feature more of generic than specific significance. Where significant features have been overlooked, it is not unusual to find that two closely related species may be confused. This is probably a frequent occurrence with Mugil species, and is in part due to the fact that the features of doubtful validity upon which differ- entiation is based often vary widely, and the limits can actually never be clearly defined. A case in point is that of auratus Risso, which has been included in our fauna-list upon. the authority of Boulenger (loc. cit., p. 86), 81 The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 591 who identified * as this species a specimen in the South African Museum from East London. In this he was followed by Barnard (loc. cit., p. 308). Specimens which agree more or less with the usual diagnosis of auratus have been found to be the most abundant form from Knysna eastwards. When numbers of these were examined, it was obvious that two well-differentiated species were present, neither of which is auratus, nor can either be identified with any existing species. The one species (canaliculatus n. sp.) is easily recognised by the multicanaliculate dorsal scales, the other (éri- cuspidens n. sp.) by the relatively large tricuspid teeth, besides many other features in each case. The South African species have stood in need of critical revision. Of the fourteen (incl. Myzus) hitherto admitted to our fauna-list, four, viz. auratus Risso, speiglert Blkr., saliens Risso, and cunnes ius C. and V., have now been found not valid, while strongylocephalus Rich., oligolepis Blkr., tricuspidens n. sp., and canaliculatus n. sp. have been added, and euronotus A. Smith, up to now regarded as a synonym of saliens, has been revived. M. diadema G. and T. has been found to be identical with compressus Gnthr., and ceylonensis Gnthr. with buchanant Blkr. Myzxus barnardi G. and T. has been found to be a synonym of Mugil cephalus Linn. It may be as well to state that of definite purpose there have been omitted from most of the descriptions those details which, by the examination of a number of specimens, have been found to vary widely, and which can have but little significance. Among these may be mentioned the nature of the dorsal and ventral profiles, of the interorbital, and the degree of compression of the body. Varia- tion in these may result from different methods of preservation, as well as in part from varying degrees of sexual maturity. It should be emphasised that a critical revision of Mugil. species, based upon an adequate world collection, is long overdue. Such a revision would be of the greatest value to systematists, if only because Mugil is almost cosmopolitan in distribution, and local specimens are contained in probably every Museum collection throughout the world. It is frankly admitted that the identification of many of our species with those from other ‘parts is provisional only. Not only are the majority of descriptions in the somewhat scanty literature available to me of little diagnostic value, but it has not been possible to secure * It may be remarked that there is no record of this identification in the 8.A. Museum. Boulenger identified other species from specimens in this Museum, of which records have been kept. 82 592 Annals of the South African Museum. the desired number of identified specimens from other parts for examination and comparison. The final pronouncement of the identity of our species must be left to some worker who has at his disposal adequate world material. The chief aim of the present work has been to establish clearly the differentiation of the South African species. It will be noticed that there are very few positive statements about synonymy, where such would be based upon descriptions only. I have nevertheless made an exhaustive study of descriptions of our, and of related, species, but in most cases the lack of significant detail would render opinions based upon these of little value. | The localities given in the present work are those from which the specimens were actually obtained. The sizes given are those of the specimens examined. Certain characteristic features of Mugil species which have received little or no attention from systematists, but which appear to be of considerable taxonomic significance, are described below. GROWTH CHANGES. There is the usual variation with age in the relative size of the eye, and of the dimensional relationships of the parts of the head. The shape of the dorsal and of the anal fin undergoes considerable modi- fication with growth in some species, e.g. buchanani (q.v.). The anterior dorsal and anal rays, the caudal lobes, the pectorals, the pectoral axillary scale, and the adipose eyelids, all appear to increase somewhat in relative size with growth. The exposed surface on the chin increases in size in some species, e.g. buchanan, and the scaling on the vertical fins appears to become denser. The origin of the first dorsal frequently appears to move towards the snout, as if there is a somewhat greater increase of the posterior than of the anterior half of the body with growth. SCALES. The scales may be cycloid or ctenoid, and in some cases (e.g. euronotus) both are present. The denticulations are generally larger, and greater in extent, on scales from the ventral area. The ventral scales are always more elongate than those from the dorsal area. The form of equivalent scales has been found to be sometimes highly characteristic, and in several cases immediately diagnostic. The multicanaliculate scales of canaliculatus enable this species to 83 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 593 be distinguished at a glance from all others from South Africa. The dorsal scales of capito are, from the early mid-juvenile stadia, denticu- late, whereas those of the closely related species euronotus are cycloid. Further, the mucus canals of the former species are long and narrow, whereas those of the latter are short and wide. The young of those species I have examined have cycloid scales, the denticulations appearing as a small mid-posterior patch, which rapidly extends over the whole area (Pl. XIX, A-E, for capite). Two species, cephalus Linn. and strongylocephalus Rich., are remark- able in possessing two distinct squamations. The main scales are large. In the investing mesodermal integument is found a secondary squamation of minute cycloid scales, which are visible upon the sur- face of the primary scales (Pl. XV, A and B). This is especially well developed over the occipital area, while, in cephalus, the largest of these scales of secondary origin are to be found in the thickened dermal investment of the axillary scales of the pectoral and ventral fins. Enlarged photographs of the scales of most of the South African species are reproduced in Plates XVII-XX, XXII. ScaLy Basat Process oF First DORSAL. One feature of significance is the relative length of the pointed scaly process at the base of the first dorsal fin. Not only does the relative length of this appear to be remarkably constant at all stages in any one species, but it differs between the species, so as to afford in some cases a reliable guide to differentiation. Its use was ap- parently first proposed by Ninni * (Considerazioni sul genere Mugil, Venezia, 1909), but I have not seen this paper, and do not know how he proposed to use it. Later authors have apparently not considered this feature of any value. DENTITION. The teeth are always very small, and are in some species very - minute, so as to resemble partly or wholly ossified dermal cilia, but they are always, in the upper jaw at least, definitely sub-labial, with the bases adnate to the premaxilla. These premaxillary teeth vary both in size and shape, and have been found to be frequently char- acteristic, and in some species immediately diagnostic: the tricuspid teeth of tricuspidens are larger than those of most others, and enable this species to be easily distinguished. * Vide Athanassoupoulos, Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen., 1920, xlviii, p. 255. 84 594 Annals of the South African Museum. The teeth appear to be equally developed at all stages. In older individuals they may be partly hidden by the development of infra- labial spongy tissue, which has probably given rise to the idea that teeth are sometimes better developed in the young, since they are then frequently exsert and more easily visible. In order to determine the nature of the premaxillary teeth, when they are partly or completely hidden, the following procedure has been found satisfactory. With a sharp pair of fine scissors a thin strip of the upper jaw is snipped off, and soaked for some minutes in rectified spirit. The strip is then placed on a slide and allowed to dry thoroughly. This causes retraction of the enveloping tissue, and leaves the teeth clearly visible. The teeth possess elongated, dilated, bases. The teeth of certain species have brown apices. This applies especially to those such as euronotus and tricuspidens, in which they are apically dilated, like those of the fresh-water Cichlidae. It is interesting to note that these species are almost wholly fluviatile. Enlarged photographs of characteristic forms of premaxillary teeth are reproduced in Plate XVII, C-G. Palatal and lingual teeth are usually villiform or obtusely conical. In old specimens they may be obscured by a layer of mucus, but may be detected by means of a dissecting needle. Those on the tongue are usually present in adjoining patches round the anterior margin, and occasionally also over the slight median ridge of this organ (fig. 8, A). VENTRAL FINS. As has been noted previously, the form of the ventrals is highly characteristic, and may prove of use as a generic feature. The last ray of each fin is connected for a part of its length to the body by a membrane, which is also joined to that from the opposing fin (fig. 1, A and B). This forms a hollow pouch, sub-triangular in cross-section. Over this pouch, and of the same length, or shorter, projects a cuneiform inter-ventral scaly process, consisting usually of five or six series of scales, the apical scale being elongate and pointed (fig. 1, sp.). The precise function of this peculiar structure is not clear. It is possible that the increased rigidity imparted to the distended ventrals may play some important part in the leaping powers of these fishes. When the. fish moves rapidly, the pressure of the water upon the inclined plane of the obliquely extended ventrals would tend 85 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 595 to divert the anterior part of the body upwards. The larger the ventrals, and the more anterior their insertion, the greater will be this effect. Fie. 1.—Diagram to show the structure of the ventral fins of Mugil species— A, lateral view; B, ventral view. mv, membrane connecting ventrals *; mb, membrane joined to body; sp, interventral scaly process. GILLS AND GILL-RAKERS. The gill-rakers to the three inner arches are set at right angles to the vertical plane of the gill-arches. The rakers themselves are extremely close-set and form a plane surface, the rigidity of each plane being assisted by the enmeshing of setiform processes which are present on the adjacent basal portions of each raker. The rakers do not interdigitate with those from the adjacent arch, but those of each side of each arch form a gently curved edge, which coincides exactly with that from the adjacent arch (Pl. XV, C). The lower pharyngeal area is divided by a raised medio-longitudinal ridge, of which a longitudinally grooved anterior dilation is immedi- ately posterior to the basibranchial cartilage. Hach half of the lower pharyngeal area is concave, the enlarged upper pharyngeals fitting exactly into the two concavities. The lower pharyngeal bones are themselves very thin, long, curved, and fairly narrow: along the middle of the upper surface of each is a cartilaginous ridge, which bears on each side of the apex, as a continuous curved plane, lamellae exactly similar in structure to, but longer than, the rakers on the functional gill-arches. The edge of the exterior series meets that of the inner series of rakers from the inner functional gill-arch. The inner edge of the inner series of these lamellae is adnate to the cutaneous margin of the medio-longitudinal pharyngeal ridge, while * Slightly exaggerated. 86 596 Annals of the South African Museum. the lower margins of both series of lamellae are adnate to the upper margin of the pharyngeals, the outer series projecting some distance into the branchial cavity (Pl. XV, C). It may be presumed that these pharyngeal lamellae have been developed from the true rakers originally present on the arch now modified to form the pharyngeals. If so, it is an interesting example of a surviving integral portion of a highly modified structure, having retained the original form and function despite the profound struc- tural and functional modification of the main structure. DIMENSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, ETC. In order that dimensional relationships and scale-counts shall have their full value, it is essential that the precise limits should be defined. In the present paper the following have been employed :— Length of Head.—This is measured with dividers in a straight line from the tip of the retracted snout to the hindmost point of the opercular margin on the level of the upper margin of the pectoral base, 2.e. 1t is measured diagonally, and not in profile. Head without snout is measured from the hind margin of the head to the anterior margin of the orbit. Length of Pectoral—This is employed as an important diagnostic character, and is measured from the body to the tip of the pectoral, when the latter is held at right angles to the side. Caudal Base.—This is taken as the base of the mid-caudal rays, which is obscured by the scaling. The body scales diminish very little in size up to this point, the scales on the basal portion of the rays being generally abruptly smaller. In fresh specimens the bases of the rays are easily visible if the caudal be distended and viewed against a light. In preserved specimens this point is less easily ascertainable, but may generally be determined by similar means. The diagnostic scale-counts employed in the present work may quite easily be made with sufficient accuracy. Scales : Lateral Series.—-This is taken as the number of scales in the first continuous series above the axil of the pectoral, from directly above the hind margin of the head (see Length of Head, above) to the caudal base (q.v.). The first series above the axil is not usually continuous, being interrupted at the 3rd or 4th scale, whereas the next series above is usually regular, often starting from above the hind margin of the head in a gentle downward curve. Scales : Transverse Series.—This count can have but little signifi- 87 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 597 cance, since the number of transverse series varies very little between the species. The counts given in this work are taken from before the origin of the first dorsal to the mid-line of the belly. Scales: Predorsal.—All previous counts of the predorsal scales have been taken from the origin of the first dorsal to the snout. Since the dorsal cephalic squamation is rarely ever regular, counts between these limits are of little value in the absence of precise definition of the method of counting. The number of predorsal scales does not appear to be of any special significance, as apart from the number in lateral series, but the number of series between the origin of the first dorsal and the point above the hind margin of the head has in each case been recorded. Angle of Lower Jaw.—This does not alone appear to be of any special significance, but as most workers make some statement about the nature of. this feature, it appears advisable to follow suit. The majority of statements appear Fic. 2.—Diagram of chin of a specimen of to have been based upon casual Mugil. To show how the angle of the mouth is taken. estimations, which can . have but little value, and actual diagrams in illustration of the angle of the mouth do not infrequently fail to agree with corresponding statements. I have therefore judged it wise to record the actual angle subtended by the corners of the mouth at the symphysis, which is not affected by the nature of the outline of the jaw, this being sometimes rounded, and sometimes angular. This angle has been measured by means of a simple goniometer devised and constructed for this purpose. Origin of first Dorsal (1) to Snout, (2) to Caudal Base, (3) te Hind Margin of Caudal Rays.—These are measured with dividers, one point at the anterior point of the base of the first dorsal spine, and the other (1) at the tip of the snout, (2) at the mid-point (lateral) of the caudal base, and (3) at the actual hind margin of the mid-caudal rays, respectively. Length of Pointed Basal Scaly Process of Furst Dorsal.—This is measured from the anterior point of the base of the first dorsal spine _ 88 598 Annals of the South African Museum. to the hindmost point (apex) of the scaly process. When the two processes are unequal in length, the longer is measured. Length of snout is measured obliquely from the tip of the snout to the anterior margin of the orbit. Total length is measured from the tip of the snout to the hind margin of the mid-caudal rays. Other measurements are taken in the usual manner. The interventral scaly process varies very little in relative length between the species, averaging three in head. Key to the South African species. I. Adipose eyelids well developed, the posterior covering more than half of the posterior width of the iris, in some cases reaching to hind margin of pupil. A. Scales 37-42. Pectorals not longer than head without snout.* 1, Anal rays 7-8. 2nd dorsal not scaly. Anterior eyelid well developed . cephalus. 2. Anal rays 9. 2nd dorsal scaly. Anterior ‘eyelid feeble. . robustus. B. Scales 33-35. Pectorals longer than head without snout * . . . strongylocephalus. IJ. Adipose eyelids narrow or rudimentary, better visible in adults, round the outer margin of the eye, covering not more than half of the posterior portion of the iris. A. Prominent papillae in several series on lower margin of upper lip, which is very deep at snout tip. (Scales 37-40) . . . . . . crentlabis. B. No papillae on upper lip, which is not, or “scarcely, more than 4 of eye deep at snout tip. 1. Scales 41-49. a. Pectorals not longer than head without snout.* Palatine teeth present. x. Scale at base of first dorsal 6-5-8 in distance from origin of first dorsal to snout tip. Soft dorsal com- pletely scaly . euronotus. y. Scale at base of first dorsal 4-5 in distance from origin of first dorsal to snout tip. Soft dorsal not scaly posteriorly . . capito. b. Pectorals longer (in adults much longer) than head without snout.* No palatine teeth. x. Teeth comparatively large, tricuspid. Pectorals 1-2-1-3in head. Maxilla wellexposed . . . . tricuspidens., 89 The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 599 y. Teeth not tricuspid, small. Pectorals 1-0-1:1 in head. Maxilla com- pletely concealed . . . seheli. 2. Scales 29-40. a. End of maxilla concealed. African species by many features, chief of which are the very short scaly process at the base of the first dorsal fin and the characteristic premaxillary teeth. These, with the scaly nature of the soft dorsal and the markedly larger eye, serve to distinguish this species immedi- ately from capito in all stadia. On our southern coasts, in my experience, euronotus rarely occurs in the sea. I have caught and identified well over a thousand specimens of Mugil, from the sea, from estuaries, and from fresh water. Only two specimens of this species have been found in the sea; in each case near the mouth of a tidal river, and in one case after a flood. In tidal estuaries ewronotus is not usually found near the sea but high up the river, where the salinity of the water is low. Curiously enough, in Natal waters the species appears to be as commonly found in the sea itself. In the Eastern Province euronotus occurs in most of the fresh waters, in most cases in isolated pools which have no connection with the sea. The species appears to thrive in dams, into which it has been introduced. It appears to breed freely in such waters, and many farmers ensure a regular supply of fresh fish by stocking dams or pools on their farms. | Mugil capito Cuv. (Plates XVII, C; XIX, A-F.) 1861. Giinther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. m1, p. 439. 1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, vol. iv, p. 83, fig. 49. 1918. Athanassoupoulos, Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen., vol. xlvi, p. 26. 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 304. * euronotus (=S. x S.E. wind) may, however, refer indirectly to the part of our area, 1.e. the south and south-eastern coastal regions, in which this species occurs, although Smith states that it inhabits the seas of the eastern and western coasts. Smith may have meant eurynotus. 104 614 Annals of the South African Museum. Depth 3-8-4-4, length of head 3-6-4-2 (J.) in length of body. Kye 4-7 (J.)-6:3 (Ad.), snout 3-2-3-6, interorbital width 2:2-2-7, and postorbital length 1-8-1-9 in length of head. Adipose eyelids rudh- mentary, scarcely visible in juveniles, better developed in adults, but never extending further than the outer rim of the iris. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter apart, anterior midway between anterior border of eye and profile of snout tip. Lower margin of preorbital scarcely bent, sometimes with a very small notch, lower and hinder margins serrate, scaly. End of maxilla well exposed. Angle of lower jaw 93-103°, outline of jaw subangular in juveniles, more rounded in Fie. 8.—Diagram to show the dentition of Mugil capito. A, tongue; B, upper jaw and palate. M, maxilla; Pl, palatines; Pm, premaxilla; Pt, pterygoids; Vm, vomer. Dentate areas dotted. adults. Symphysial knob double. Upper lip fairly thin, width at snout apex 3-Dineye. Slightly flattened, recurved, subspatulate teeth in a single fairly widely spaced row in the upper jaw (Pl. XVII, C). Lower jaw edentate. Villiform teeth on vomer, palatines, pterygoids, and tongue (fig. 8). D IV +I, 8-9. First dorsal inserted nearer tip of snout than base of caudal, 1-06—-1-1 times as far from the latter as from the former, 1:30-1:38 times as far from the hind margin of the mid-caudal rays as from the tip of the snout. First spine 1-7-2-0, base of first dorsal 2-1-2-5 in head. Distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal 0-95-1-2 (J.) in head. First dorsal inserted above the 14th— 16th, second above the 28th—30th lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends behind origin of first dorsal 2-3-2-6 in head, 2:0-2-6 in distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal, 4-5 in distance from 105 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 615 origin of first dorsal to tip of snout. Longest soft ray 1-9-2-3, base of second dorsal 2-9-3-5 in head. Last ray slightly longer than penultimate, fin slightly elevated anteriorly, edge gently concave. Second dorsal scaly basally and anteriorly only. A III, 9. Inserted slightly in advance of second dorsal, below the 26th-29th lateral scale. Longest ray 1-8-2-3 in head. In shape fin resembles dorsal. Scaly anteriorly and basally. P 16-18, 1-45-1-75 in head (usually 1-6—1-7), tip reaches to the 10th-12th lateral scale. Fin scarcely ever as long as postorbital plus eye, inserted 1-5-2-3 times as far from the ventral as from the N- Fic. 9.—Mugil capito Cuv. (see note, fig. 3). dorsal profile. Axillary scale 2-7 (Ad.)-4-5 in length of pectoral, obscure in young specimens. Ventrals 1-6 (J.)-1-9 in head, inserted below midway between origin of first dorsal and hind margin of head, or slightly behind or before. Axillary scale 3-3-3-6 in head. Edge of fin truncate. Caudal moderately forked, upper lobe slightly longer, mid-rays 2-1-2-5 in head. Scales ctenoid (Pl. XIX, E and F), predorsal scales 1-0-1-2 (Ad.) times as long as wide. Mucus canal long and narrow. Very young fishes have cycloid dorsal scales, the denticulations develop with growth (Pl. XIX, A-E), lr. 44-48, ltr. 15-16; 4-5 cheek scales, 15-17 predorsal to above the hind margin of the head. Colour.—Greenish to dull brown above, silvery below. Sometimes indistinct longitudinal streaks. Opercles usually with golden blotch. Localities.—Walfisch Bay, Lambert’s Bay, Table Bay, False Bay, Cape Agulhas, Port Beaufort, Knysna, Plettenberg Bay, Port Eliza- beth, Port Alfred, Great Fish Point, East London, Mazeppa Bay, Durban, Sinkwazi. Also in tidal rivers. 106 616 Annals of the South African Museum. Length.—Up to 405 mm. Fifty-five specimens, from 50 mm. up, examined. It appears to be reasonably certain that our specimens should be assigned to capito Cuv. I have received a number of specimens from the Zoological Station, Naples, among which is one very likely conspecific with the species I have here designated capito. Specimens of capito, auratus, and saliens were included, but the preservative employed in the package had unfortunately destroyed all the labels, so that I am unable to say which specimen was actually identified in Naples as capito. I have also examined a specimen of reputed capito from Holland, but this is not conspecific; if it 1s correctly named, our species is not capito. This specimen has pectoral 1:35 in head and has no axillary pectoral process, and in general outlines resembles auratus Risso rather than capito or saliens. Since, as is indicated below, I find it impossible from the literature to find any certain basis for the differentiation of saliens from capito, the most that can be said is that our specimens are probably identical with the latter species. Boulenger identified a specimen (No. 12048) in the 8.A. Museum as capito Cuv. He also identified as saliens Risso another specimen (No. 10157, from Table Bay), which I cannot by any means whatso- ever differentiate from the former; the latter even possesses a well- developed scaly process in the pectoral axil, the absence of which in saliens Boulenger (loc. cit.) makes his Key characteristic for differentia- tion from capito. | Giinther (loc. cit.) appears to have been satisfied that specimens from the Cape were identical with the European capito, but he re- marked that Smith’s specimens were badly stuffed, and of little use as types or for comparison—a fact which has recently been confirmed by a private communication from Mr. Norman of the British Museum. If one may Judge from the literature, a certain amount of mystery surrounds the identity of saliens. Giinther (loc. cit., p. 443) did not appear to be very certain of this species, and the features upon which he based his differentiation of saliens from capito (and from auratus) are inconstant and unreliable. Boulenger (F.W.F. Africa, loc. cit.) was obviously uncertain of saliens, and it may be remarked that this is the only African Mugil species of which he gives no figure. Barnard has evidently merely followed Boulenger in regard to the differentia- tion of saliens from capito. Athanassoupoulos (loc. cit.) has endeavoured to elucidate this, 107 Lhe Foshes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 617 but his conclusions have shed little light upon the problem, for he relies in his Key chiefly upon the supposed fact that the mouth of sahens is more convex than that of capito, which is at best of little practical value, and unlikely to be constant even were more precise details provided. This author has also proposed to use as diagnostic features certain dimensional relationships which would have to be tested over a wider range of stadia before their value can be accepted. Differentiation between capito and saliens, based solely upon the presence or absence of the axillary process of the pectoral, has been accepted by many systematists, but does not appear to be absolute. Most authors state that this axillary process is present in capito but absent in saliens, whereas Athanassoupoulos says that the latter species actually has a short process in the axil. As far as the South African specimens are concerned, a large process is apparent only in adults of capito. Juveniles have a very short process in the axil, and in a long and regular series of all stadia it may be seen that the size and length of this process increases regularly with age. In pre- served juvenile and half-grown specimens it is often exceedingly difficult to be certain whether the process is present or not, and so inconstant and unreliable is this feature that I should not venture to use it as a sole basis for differentiation in the present case. Not only does it appear certain that salens, as distinct from capito, does not occur in our area, but I have come, from the literature at my disposal, to doubt the validity of that species. At all events, it would appear that those who have specimens of capito, and of reputed saliens, must present stronger evidence for the maintenance of the latter species than has hitherto appeared. Athanassoupoulos states that the basal scale of the first dorsal of salens is shorter than the base of this fin, whereas in capito it is slightly shorter to slightly longer than the base, but he has given no quantitative data. This may eventually prove to be the key feature of any established differentiation. Among the specimens from Naples are two which agree in some respects with the general diagnosis of saliens. There is no process, or a very small one, in the axil, and the preorbital is deeply notched; the mouth is more obtuse, and the scale at the base of the first dorsal is relatively longer than in capito, while the pectorals are 1-3-1-35 in head. I cannot venture to make any statement about the identity of these specimens, but they are certainly different from any species from South Africa which I have examined. M. capito appears to be found throughout the greater part of our area, being most abundant on the West coast and round the Cape as far 108 618 Annals of the South African Museum. as Port Beaufort, in which parts it is the most important Mugil species. It is distinguished from other South African species by the scale- count, the very short pectorals, the scarcely obtuse mouth, and the well-exposed maxillary. | Mugil tricuspidens n. sp. (Plates XVII, A, F, G; XVIII, G, H.) 1849. Smith, Illus. §8.A. Pisces, pl. xxx, fig. 1 (capensis C. & V.). 1853. Pappe, Edible Fish. C.G.H., p. 27 (multilineatus). 1861. Giinther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. i, p. 443 (salvens part). 1925. Barnard, Ann. §.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 308 (auratus part). Depth 4-0-4:5, length of head 4-0 (J.)-4-4 (Ad.) in length of body. Eye 4:6 (J.)-5-4 (Ad.), snout 3-4-3-7, interorbital width 2-0-2-5, post- orbital length 1-8-2-0 in length of head. Adipose eyelids rudi- mentary, scarcely visible in juveniles, clearly visible in adults, posterior better developed. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter apart, anterior midway between front margin of eye and tip of snout profile. Lower margin of preorbital undulate, lower and hinder edge serrate. End of maxilla clearly visible. Angle of lower jaw 103-108°, outline of jaw rounded. Symphysial knob indistinctly double. Upper lip thin, width at apex of snout 3-4ineye. Flattened, apically dilated, recurved, tricuspid teeth (Pl. XVII, G) in a single series in upper jaw: in juveniles the teeth are more dilated, and the central cusp is spatulate (Pl. XVII, F). When viewed in fresh specimens, usually the central cusp only shows. The lip must be pushed back before the basal cusps are to be seen. The relatively large size of the teeth, and the wide spacing of the central cusps are distinctive characters. Lower jaw edentate. Villiform teeth on vomer, ptery- goids, and tongue. Palatines edentate. In adults the membrane of the roof of the mouth, and of the tongue, have close-set, apically dilated, tricuspid cilia. D IV +I, 8. First dorsal inserted 1-0 (J.)-1-07 times as far from base of caudal as from tip of snout, 1-25-1-35 times as far from hind margin of the mid-caudal rays as from tip of snout. First spine 1-9-2-1, base of first dorsal 2-1-2-5 in head. Distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal 1-0-1-1 times head. First dorsal inserted above the 15th or 16th, second above the 28th or 29th lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends behind origin of first dorsal, 2-5-2-8 in head, 5-4—5-8 in distance from snout tip to origin 109 The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 619 of first dorsal, 2-4-2-8 in distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal. Second soft ray 1-5-1-8, base of second dorsal 2-6-2:8 in head. Last ray longer than penultimate, fin anteriorly elevated, sub-falcate, edge concave. Second dorsal scaly only anteriorly and basally. A III, 9, inserted slightly in advance of second dorsal, below the 27th—28th lateral scale. Second ray 1-6-1-8 in head, last ray longer than penultimate; edge of fin concave; scaly. P 18, 1-2-1-3 in head, tip reaches to the 11th or 12th lateral scale, inserted 1-6-2-0 times as far from the ventral as from the dorsal \ -" -- - oo ~~ ~~ ~ Fic. 10.—Mugil tricuspidens n. sp. (see note, fig. 3). profile. No marked axillary scale in juveniles; a short, blunt, curved scale in adults, movable only in fresh specimens. _ Ventrals 1-7-1-8 in head, inserted below midway between base of pectoral and origin of first dorsal, edge of fin gently rounded Axillary scale 3-1-3-5 in head. | Caudal forked, upper lobe longer in adults, mid-rays 1:7-1-9 in head. Scales ctenoid: mucus canal short, oblique. Predorsal scales nearly as wide as long (Pl. XVIII, G and H), |r. 43-48, Ltr. 14-15. Four cheek scales, 16-17-predorsal to above hind margin of head. Colour.—Greenish above, silvery on sides and below. 7-8 very distinct longitudinal dusky streaks corresponding with the scale rows, visible in all but the very youngest stadia. Opercles golden or bronzy. Localities.—Mossel Bay, Knysna River, Zwartkops River, Buffalo River, Mazeppa Bay, Durban. | Length.—Up to 550 mm. Sixteen specimens, from 60 mm. in length up, examined. Types, from Knysna, in the Albany Museum. There is very little doubt that the specimens described by Smith VOL. XXX, PART 9. 42 110 620 Annals of the South African Museum. (loc. cit.), as capensis C. and V., belong to this species. The sole diagnostic feature in the description is the scale-count, which is valid also for capito or saliens. The figure, however, leaves no doubt about the identity with tricuspidens. It may be noted that in A. Smith’s pl. xxx, fig. 1 is below and fig. 2 above. Pappe (loc. cit.) had evidently not noticed this, for he has obviously confused multilineatus with capensis. Boulenger (loc. cit.), presumably having seen both the type of capensis C. and V. and Smith’s specimen, stated that this latter is not capensis C.and V. Giinther (loc. cit.) accepted Smith’s diagnosis, but regarded the latter species as identical with euronotus Smith, and stated that both are identical with saliens Risso. The original description of capensis (C. and V., Hist. Nat. Poiss., vol. x1, p. 108) is so vague and brief that it is quite impossible even to guess what species was actually described. I am therefore provisionally naming this tricuspidens n. sp., and must leave the final pronouncement of the validity of this step to some worker who may be able to examine adequate material, in- cluding the type of capensis C. and V. As this species is normally estuarine, it is possible that it may prove to be endemic. It is well differentiated from our other species. by numerous features, chiefly by the relatively large tricuspid teeth, while the characteristic longitudinal stripes show up well even in preserved specimens. It may be noted that net fishermen at Knysna constantly dis- tinguish this species as the “Streepharder,” naming large specimens (unfortunately in common with large specimens of all species) “Springer.” M. tricuspidens does not appear to be anywhere very numerous nor specially gregarious, and, so far as I am aware, occurs only in tidal estuaries. Juvenile specimens are seldom encountered, and since the species is characterised by most extraordinary leaping powers, large numbers are rarely taken by the nets. I have at night in a boat frequently pursued adults of this species, which are exceedingly difficult to capture. When startled, large adults will leap anything up to 40 feet, rising 7 to 8 feet in the air, and the leap may be repeated six or seven times. The species may be clearly distinguished at night, when in the air, by means of a powerful light, the longitudinal stripes showing up clearly against the light silvery body. Specimens occasionally jump into a boat which carries a light ; large adults weighing 53 lb. have been taken in this manner, and I 111 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 621 have known a man to be knocked from his seat by the impact of one of these fishes on his chest. At Knysna ripe females are encountered in the late autumn and early spring. Specimens are usually encountered at night in shallow water on mud-banks, and are exceedingly shy. I have occasionally been able to approach specimens which have continued to circle over the mud, clearly visible in the light of the lamp, but the least move- ment of the light, or any noise in the boat, results in the characteristic leap. On one occasion a dozen or more large specimens broke water round the boat, and for some seconds the air appeared to be full .of silvery bodies, and the plunging leaps produced a considerable volume of sound. Mugil sehelt Forsk. (Plates XVI, C, and XVIII, C, D.) 1888. Day, Fish. India, p. 355. 1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, vol. iv, p. 91, fig. 53. 1922. Weber and de Beaufort, Fish. Indo-Aust. Archip., vol. iv, p. 252. 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 306. Depth 3-8, length of head 3-8 in length of body. Eye 4-5, snout 4-2, interorbital width 2-4, and postorbital length 1-8 in length of head. Adipose eyelids rudimentary. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter apart, anterior nearer the profile of the tip of the snout than the anterior margin of the eye. Lower margin of preorbital bent, notched, and serrate; scaly. Maxilla completely concealed. Angle of lower jaw 103°, outline of jaw angular. Upper lip thin, width at apex of snout 4 in eye. Symphysial knob double. No teeth in jaws visible. Vomer with traces of fine teeth, tongue with patches of villiform teeth. Palatines edentate. Exposed area on chin very short and narrow, would probably increase with age. D IV+I, 8. First dorsal inserted 1-1 times as far from caudal base as from the tip of the snout, 1-4 times as far from the tip of the mid-caudal rays as from the tip of the snout. First spine 2-1, base of first dorsal 2-9 in head. Distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal 1-05 in head. First dorsal inserted above the 13th, second above the 26th lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends behind origin of first dorsal 2-4 in head, 2-1 in distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal, and 4-2-5 in distance from origin of first dorsal to tip of snout. Longest soft ray shorter than the ventral fin and than the distance from hind margin of head to the 112 622 Annals of the South African Museum. centre of the eye, 1:8; base of second dorsal 2-7 in head. Last ray longer than penultimate, fin scarcely falcate anteriorly, edge moder- ately concave. Soft dorsal scaly. A III, 9. Inserted slightly in advance of second dorsal, below the 25th lateral scale. Longest ray 1-7 in head, shape of fin similar to that of second dorsal; scaly. P 18, 1-1 in head, tip reaches to the 13th lateral scale, fin inserted 3:3 times as far from the ventral as from the dorsal profile. Axillary scale long and pointed, 3-2 in length of head. Most of fin scaled. Ventrals 1-6 in head, longer than longest dorsal ray, inserted below Fie. 11.—Mugil seheli Forsk. (see note, fig. 3). midway between hind margin of head and origin of first dorsal or slightly nearer the former. Edge of fin gently rounded. Axillary scale 3in head. Fin almost completely scaly. Caudal deeply forked, upper lobe longer, mid-rays 1-7 in head; scaly. Scales more or less cycloid, traces of denticulations on exposed area. Mucus canal long and narrow (Pl. XVIII, Cand D). Predorsal scales as wide as long. Lat. ser. 39-41, ltr. 14, 3 cheek scales, 14 predorsally to above the hind margin of the head. Colour.—Silvery, darker above. Axil of pectoral black. Localhity.—Durban, Chilka Lake, Bay of Bengal.* Length.—Up to 170 mm. Three specimens, from 167 mm. in length up, examined. Judging from the literature many authors are uncertain of the diagnosis of seheli. The majority agree in a scale-count of 38-42 and in stating that the maxillary is hidden. Fowler (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sei. Phil., 1925, vol. lxxvi, p. 209) describes as seheli two specimens * A specimen kindly lent by the Director of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. 113 The Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 623 from Delagoa Bay, and states that the scales are 33-35, but omits to mention whether the maxillary is hidden or exposed. These specimens can hardly be seheli; the description agrees closely with that of strongylocephalus Guthr., and it is possible that Fowler may have overlooked the adipose eyelids, although in the same paper he describes a specimen of this latter species (as longimanus Gnthr.) from the same locality. (But see note under canaliculatus.) M. caeruleomaculatus Lac. is by many authors held to be a synonym of seheli. I have, however, examined a specimen of the former species from India,* and it is quite clearly distinct. M. sehelt is not very abundant in our area, nor does it appear to extend south of Natal. It is apparently widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific. Mugil buchanani Blkr. (Plates XVI, D, and XX, C, D.) 1861. Ginther, Cat. Fish. B.M., vol. iii, p. 446 (ceylonensis). 1888. Day, Fish. India, p. 358. 1916. Boulenger, F.W.F. Africa, p. 93, fig. 55 (ceylonensis). 1925. Barnard, Ann. 8.A. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 305 (ceylonensis). 1928. Fowler, Fish. Oceania, p. 123. Snout very broad and short, bluntly rounded anteriorly. Depth 3°3-3'7, length of head 3-3 (J.)-4-0 (Ad.) in length of body. Hye 3-2 (J.)-5 (Ad.), snout 3-5 (J.)—4-0 (Ad.), interorbital width 2-0-2-3 (J.), and postorbital length 1-7-1-9 in length of head. Adipose eyelids rudimentary, better visible in adults. Nostrils 4 of eye diameter apart, anterior as far from profile of snout tip as posterior from _ anterior margin of orbit. Lower margin of preorbital slightly bent, not, or slightly, notched; end truncated, lower and hinder edge serrated, scaly. End of maxilla completely concealed. Angle of lower jaw 110-122°, outline of jaw almost angular. Symphysial knob double. Upper lip thin, width at apex of snout 5ineye. Very minute ciliiform teeth in a single series in each Jaw in very young specimens, none visible in half-grown or adults. Vomer and palatines edentate. Pre-vomerine groove distinct. Villiform teeth on ptery- goids and round the anterior margin of the tongue. Space between rami of mandibles on chin almost absent in juveniles, gradually enlarges with age; long and wide in large adults. D IV+I, 8. First dorsal inserted 0-90 (J.)-1:15 (Ad.) times as * Kindly lent by the Director of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. 114 624 Annals of the South African Museum. far from the caudal base as from tip of snout, 1-23 (J.)-1-43 times as far from the hind margin of the mid-caudal rays as from the tip of the snout. First spine 1-7-1-9, base of first dorsal 2-0-2-2 in head. Distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal 1:0—1-2 (J.) in head. First dorsal inserted above the 9th-12th, second above the 20th-23rd lateral scale. Pointed sheath scale extends behind the origin of the first dorsal 2-6—2-9 (J.) in head, 2-4-2-6 in distance from origin of first to origin of second dorsal and 5-0-6-6 in distance from origin of first dorsal to tip of snout. Second soft ray longer than ventrals, and than distance from hind margin of head to centre of eye, 1:25-1-4 (J.); base of second dorsal 2-6-3 (J.)in head. Last ray fem. — Fig. 12.—Mugil buchanani Blkr. (see note, fig. 3). longer than penultimate; in adults the fin is anteriorly elevated, falcate, edge deeply concave. Second dorsal densely scaled. A III, 9. Inserted opposite origin of second dorsal. Second ray 1-2-1-4 (J.) in head, last ray longer than penultimate; in adults the fin is anteriorly elevated, falcate, edge deeply concave, densely scaled. There is considerable alteration in the shape of the soft dorsal and anal fins with growth. In very young specimens (< 100 mm.) the anterior rays are fairly long, but the fin is not markedly falcate, since the middle rays are relatively longer than in the adult, and the edges of the fins are feebly concave. As the size of the fish increases, the anterior rays become relatively longer and the middle rays shorter, the fin assuming the anteriorly falcate shape when the length of the fish is more than +120mm. The scaling of the fins also increases from the very young to this size. In the former the basal scaling only is plain, there being apparently a mere sprinkling of light scales over the distal portions of the fins. P 17-18, 1-0-1-15 (J.) in head, tip reaches 11th—12th lateral] scale, 115 Lhe Fishes of the Family Mugilidae in South Africa. 625 inserted 2-8-3-3 times as far from ventral as from dorsal profile. of head darker. Scales, especially dorsal, with dusky margins. (Fresh) : “ Rosy, shot pale violet. Gamboge edges to scales give appearance of lines. Pectoral yellow. Outer rays of ventrals pale blue. Anal rosy with red patch anteriorly. Caudal red, gamboge tips.” (H. W. Bell-Marley.) VOL. VII, PART 2. 14 Scales feebly ctenoid. 1.1. 61, 1. tr. TEXT-FIG. 4. Mey o) des argyrogrammicus (C. & V.). ipomoi Prist 287 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 185 Lenetu.—415 mm. Locauiry.—East London. A single specimen (H. W. Bell-Marley, No. 946). I have seen the South African Museum specimen from Natal, described by Barnard (‘Ann. 8. Afr. Mus.’, vol. xxi, p. 648, 1927) as filamentosus C. & V. That author stated palatine teeth to be absezit, but they are present in the specimen, and beiig incurved are not easy to detect. The South African Museum specimen and mine are unquestionably conspecific. The gill- raker count given is that of the former, the gills having been removed from mine. | Fowler’s treatment of the Indo-Pacific species of Pristi- pomoldes Blkr. (loc. cit., pp. 186-193) is not very satisfactory ; e.g. he uses the number of gill-rakers as his primary key- character, and gives 12-13 for microdon Stewndachner, and 15- 16 for argyrogrammicus. Then, in a footnote to the description of the former species he states that microdon from Okinwa has 15, from Hawaii 16-17 gill-rakers. The South African species agree best with the diagnosis of argyrogrammicus C. & V., which is the oldest species. In Fowler’s descriptions, so little difference of any significance 1s shown between the four nominal species that it would not be surprising to find the eventual recognition of only one somewhat polymorphous form. Family PLECTORHYNCHIDS. Pomadasys stridens (Forsk). Pomadasys stridens (Forsk) ; Fowler, U.S. Nat. Mus., Bull. 100, vol. xi, p. 319, 1931 (references and synonymy). Body robust, slightly compressed, not very deep. Head rather broad, mouth small. Profile of snout low. Depth 3-1, length of head 3-0 in length of body. Hye 3-7, snout 3-1, inter- orbital 3-3, postorbital 2-1 in head length. Preopercle with straight hind edge, finely serrate. Maxilla extends to below posterior nostril. 9-10 stout gill-rakers on lower limb of anterior 28 8 186 J. L. B. SMITH. arch, 3-5 in gill-filaments, which are 1-7 in eye. A defined pit and two anterior pores on chin. D. XII. 14, inserted above just behind opercular margin. Spines moderate, Ist 7:5, 2nd 3-8, 3rd 2°8, 4th and 5th longest 2:2 in head ; remainder decrease to the penultimate, and 12th spine slightly longer. Anterior rays longest subequal 3 in head. Edge of soft fin gently convex. Base of spinous fin 1-1, of soft fin 1-6 in head. A. III 7, inserted below the 4th dorsal ray ; 2nd spine 2:5 in head, longer and stronger than 3rd. Soft rays 2-2 in head, edge of fin gently concave, heavily scaled for ? length. Pectoral 1-1 in head, reaches above anal origin. Ventrals do not reach vent, 1-6 in head. Caudal moderately forked. Scales strongly ctenoid. Lateral series about 65, 1. tr. 0 (1. 1. to belly). Tubular lateral line scales 52. About 56 predorsal scales, extend to above nostrils. 10-12 cheek scales, and 5-6 more on preopercle flange. Anterior lateral line tubes bifid, single on peduncle. CoLtour.—Dark brown, slightly lighter below. An indistinct fairly broad dusky stripe from opercle to caudal; traces of 2 narrow stripes above. Opercular spot doubtful. Fins all dusky, caudal darkest. LrenetH.—Up to 177 mm. LocaLity.—Durban. Two specimens taken on lines near Durban (H. W. Bell-Marley, 4/35). This is the first record from South Africa of this Indian species. Fowler (° Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil.’, vol. Ixxvii, p. 230, 1925) described as striatus G. & T. a specimen from Delagoa Bay. Actually that specimen was probably stridens (see Barnard, ‘Ann. 8. Afr. Mus.’, vol. xxi, p. 680, 1927). Also Fowler (‘ Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil.’, vol. lxxxvi, p. 467, fig. 39, 1934) has described two specimens as striatus G. & 7. which cannot be that species, but are obviously conspecific with my present specimens. Actually my specimens and Fowler’s differ in certain particulars 289 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 187 from the usual diagnoses of stridens, and it is possible that they represent a new species. This cannot be determined with certamty without comparison with an Indian specimen of stridens. I have compared the specimens described above with one of striatus G. & T. of the same size ; the two are certainly not conspecific. P. stridens is of much darker colour, has a smaller mouth, and a more robust but shallower body than striatus. Also the longitudinal stripes are much clearer in all stadia of the latter species than in stridens. Family Laprip”. Pteragogus opercularis Peters. Text-fig. 5. Pteragogus opercularis Peters; Barnard, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 754, 1927. Body oblong, compressed. Dorsal profile concave before eye, nape prominent. Depth 2-3, length of head 2-8 in body length. Kye 6-0, snout 3-0, interorbital 5-2, and postorbital 2-0 in length of head. Preorbital depth slightly greater than eye. Maxilla completely concealed beneath preorbital, extends to below anterior margin of pupil. 4 anterior caniniform teeth in the front of each jaw, the median pair small and erect, the outer curved, flaring out and back. 2-3 small posterior canines at hind edge of upper jaw. A single series of stout conical teeth along the side of each jaw, close-set, forming a cutting edge. Outer gill-arch more or less reduced, rakers 5 or 6 on lower limb, rudimentary. Gill-membranes hidden below interopercles, united, form a moderate fold across the throat. Preopercle flange spinate, 24-26 spinules down to lower angle, lower margin entire. D. XI, 9, inserted above middle of opercle, 1st spine 1-2 times eye, increase to the last, about 2-5 times eye. Membrane between spines extended, lobed. Anterior soft ray equal to last spine, increase to the 6th, 3 times eye, edge of fin rounded. Depressed rays reach caudal base. | A. III, 9, inserted below the last dorsal spines. Soft fin in shape and size like soft dorsal, depressed rays reach beyond caudal base. TEXT-FIG. 5. + RT Pteragogus opercularis Peters. 291 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 189 P. 13, 1-8 in head, rounded. Ventrals with first ray filamen- tous, 1:8 in body length; tip reaches almost to caudal base. Caudal broadly rounded. Scales large, upper dorsal and lower ventral scales produced, forming a sheath for the dorsal and anal fins. Lateral line continuous, abruptly bent before peduncle. 1. 1. 24, 1. tr. 2/6 (including dorsal sheath). Cheek scales concealed beneath thick, spongy skm. Opercular bones scaly, scales partly concealed. Lateral line tubes of anterior scales with an arborescent superior branch. 5 predorsal scales. CoLour.—Olive-green above, lighter below. Numerous dark spots on forehead and above and behind eye. A large ocellus covering most of opercle. Dark edges to scales above the lateral line. Fainter dark spots in a series above and below the lateral line tubes. A dark spot between each pair of the 1st-4th dorsal spines. Mid-posterior dorsal rays dusky. Caudal reddish. outer rays alternately ight and dark. Iris golden. Lenetu.—140 mm. Locatity.—Durban (H. W. Bell-Marley, 4/35). A single specimen of this species. Previously recorded from Mozambique by Peters in 1855, but not hitherto found in Natal waters. Family GEMPYLID. Thyrsitoides marleyi Fowler. Thyrsitoides marleyi Fowler, Ann. Natal Mus., vol. vi, pt. 2, p. 255, fig. 2, 1929. Skin very thin and papery. Body elongate, very compressed, tapers to peduncle. Depth 8°9, length of head 3:6 in length of body. Eye 7:0, snout 2-2, interorbital 5-4, and postorbital 2-6 in head length. Mouth very large ; lower jaw projects strongly; maxilla extends below anterior margin of eye. A single row of pomted trenchant teeth in each jaw. Anteriorly in the upper jaw several very large slender fixed pointed somewhat compressed teeth, one 292 190 J. L. B. SMITH. smaller anteriorly, depressible. Vomer edentate, fine teeth on palatines. Tongue covered with minute teeth. Gill-rakers rudimentary, 4 or 5 fine bi- or trifid processes near angle on lower margin of anterior arch; remaining upper surface of arch with fine villiform teeth. Guill-membranes not united, free from isthmus. Nostrils wide apart, anterior small, circular, posterior slit-like. Free margin of preopercle round angle undulate, probably spinate in young. Interorbital with a longitudinal wide furrow. | | D. XVIII, 12 + 5, originates above middle of opercle. Anterior spines longest, Ist 2-8, 2nd 2-3, 3rd and 4th broken, 5th 3-8 in head, thereafter shorter. Anterior rays falcate, 3-5 in head. A. 13 + 4, inserted below soft dorsal; anterior rays falcate, somewhat lower than soft dorsal. Pectorals subfalcate, 2:5 in head. Ventrals close together, first (outer) ray longest, 3-5 in head. Caudal deeply forked, peduncle cylindrical. Body largely covered with very fine cycloid scales. densest on nape, along back from peduncle. A patch behind eye, head otherwise naked. Two lateral lines, lower branching from upper. Upper runs from upper angle of operculum to the base-of the 16th (left) or 17th (right) dorsal spme. On the right side this line has a break with a small inferior branch below the 13th dorsal ray. 190 scales in upper line (24 to where lower branch originates). The lower line originates just behind the base of the 4th dorsal ray, and curves down to run along the middle of the side to the caudal base. About 310 scales in the lower branch. CoLour.—Slaty-blue, shading to grey on belly. Membrane of spinous dorsal, and tips of caudal and pectoral black. LenetTH.—590 mm. | Locatiry.—East London. A single specimen, presented by the Curator of the East London Museum. This is an interesting rediscovery of a species known hitherto only from the type, from which the present specimen differs only in minutie, despite the disparity in size. 293 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 191 Family ScomBRIDA. Sarda chilensis C.& V. Text-fig. 6. Sarda chilensis C. & V.; Barnard, Ann. 8. Afr. Mus., vol. xxi, p. 800, 1927. Body fusiform, moderately compressed. Snout conical, pointed. Depth 4-5, length of head 3-5 in body length. Eye 6-0, snout 2-8, mterorbital 3-4 and postorbital 2:0 in length of. head. Preorbital depth half eye. Mouth large, maxilla distally expanded, spatulate; extremity extends below hind margin of eye. 17-18 moderate compressed inwardly depressible acute teeth in a single series in each side of upper jaw. In lower jaw 4 or 5 large sub-conical depressible teeth anteriorly ; along each side 5-6 large compressed inwardly depressible teeth, with a few smaller mtermediate. Vomer edentate, palatines with fine sharp teeth. Gull-membranes united, free from isthmus. 8 gill-rakers plus one anterior rudiment on lower limb of anterior arch, longest 1-6 in gill- filaments, which are equal to eye. Adipose eyelids moderate, not to pupil. Interorbital broadly convex. with a slight median longitudinal furrow. D. XIX, 14 + 7, inserted above hind margin of operculum. Ist spine 2-8, 2nd and 3rd subequal, longest 2-7 in head ; remainder graduated shorter, last minute. Soft rays anteriorly falcate, highest 3-2 in head. Base of spinous dorsal 1-2 times head. A. III, 12 + 6, insertéd below end of base of continuous soft dorsal. In shape and size much as soft dorsal. Pectorals 2:6 in head, ventrals 3-2 in head, inserted below pectorals. Caudal lunate. Peduncle depressed, with a single stout lateral keel, base of caudal with two auxiliary keels, one above and one below end of peduncular keel. Scales minute, over whole body. Enlarged scales form a corselet over pectoral region, from isthmus up, embracing pectoral, extending up and forwards over nape; a long narrow extension back along base of spinous dorsal. Lateral line curves up over pectoral, thence obliquely down to peduncle. TEXT-FIG. 6. = SEHR eee * a ; t Sarda chilensis C.& V. 295 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 193 CoLour.—Steel-blue to black above, lighter below. Head blackish above, with curved dark post-orbital bar. Body with 6-7 narrow longitudinal dark stripes, longest along middle of side. 12-13 dusky cross-bars, slightly greater than interspaces fading out on abdomen. Spinous dorsal black anteriorly and posteriorly, mid-spines lighter. Soft dorsal dusky. Caudal dark with median light patch in each lobe. Pectorals with distal central dark patch, margin light. Ventrals dusky proximally. Anal and all finlets light. LeneTH.—310 mm. Locatiry.—Durban. A single specimen (a ripe female) (H. W. Bell-Marley, 978). Seldom taken in our area. The Atlantic species sarda C. & V. is generally held to be distinct from chilensis C & V., chiefly in having 21 dorsal spines and the maxilla extending behind the hind margin of the eye. The two species are evidently very closely related, and comparison of equivalent stadia may eventually reveal that they are identical. Family BLENNIID. Blennius fascigula Barnard. Blennius fascigula Brnrd; Smith, Rec. Alb. Mus., p. 152, pl. xvi, 1931 ; Fowler, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., vol. lIxxxvu, p. 404, fig. 36, 1935 (trifascigula). | A specimen of this species, from Durban, has been received from Mr. Bell-Marley, who also sent to Fowler the specimens upon which was based the species trifascigula Fowler as distinct from fascigula Barnard. Fowler has evidently not seen the account of specimens of fascigula from East London (Smith, loc. cit.). I have compared the specimen from Durban with those from East London, and with the type of fascigula, and they are all without doubt conspecific. trifascigula 1s most certainly identical with both the Durban and the Kast London specimens, and cannot therefore be maintained as distinct. 296 194 J. L. B. SMITH. Petroscirtes tapeinosoma Blkr. Petroscirtes tapeinosoma Blkr.; Smith, Rec. Alb. Mus., vol. iv, p. 213, pl. xxi, B, 1935. The first record from South Africa of this Indo-Pacific form was a specimen taken at Great Fish Point in 1934. Two specimens have recently been obtained in a rock-pool near Kast London, so that the species is evidently established in our area. Family CLINID. NOTE ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES OF CLINUS Cuv. IN Souto AFRICA. Until fairly recently it has been accepted that species of Clinus Cuv. were largely confined to the colder waters charac- teristic of the coasts of the west and south-western Cape. This was chiefly due to the fact that the only part of South Africa in which intensive collecting of these fishes had been carried out was that particular area. Within the last few years investigation has shown that Clinus species extend very much further east into the warmer waters of the Indian Ocean than had previously been suspected. Quite a number have been found to occur regularly along the coast eastwards from False Bay, at least as far as East London. Quite recently I have found a number of Clinus species exceedingly abundant as far east as the mouth of the Great Kei River. It is most probable that continued investigation will show that these species extend even still further eastwards. One species, heterodon, C. & V., has actually been traced as far as North Zululand (Smith, 1934). The results of recent investigations merit a revised account of the distribution of Clinus species in South Africa, and this is summarized below. 297 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 195 Clinus species. Distribution. acuminatus C. & V. Walfisch Bay to False Bay. anguillaris C. & V. False Bay to Great Fish Point (S.): Durban (B.M.). Knysna estuary. False Bay to Keimouth (S.). False Bay ; Great Fish Point (S.). agilis J. L. B. Smith brachycephalus C. & V. brevicristatusG. dT. . capensis C.¢d V. . cottoidesC. d& V.. dorsalis Blkr. fucorum G. & T. heterodonC. & V. laurentiiG. @ T. . latipennis C. & V. mentalisG. & T. musG.¢T.. ornatusG. & T. pavoG.d T. robustusG. & 7. striatus G. & T. superciliosus Linn. taurus G.d& 7. venustrisG. ¢& T.. Lambert’s Bay (S.) to East London (S.): Durban (B.M.). Lambert’s Bay (S.) to Durban (B.M.). Walfisch Bay to Keimouth (S.). False Bay: Port Alfred (8.). False Bay to North Zululand (S.). Port Alfred (S.) to Zululand (B.M.). False Bay. East London: Durban (B.M.). False Bay to Keimouth (S.). False Bay : Knysna (S.). False Bay (Great Fish Point): Keimouth (S.). Table Bay to East London (S.): Durban (B.M.). False Bay ; Port Alfred (S.); Durban (B.M.). Walfisch Bay to Durban (B.M.). Cape Peninsula: Plettenberg Bay (S8.). False Bay : Knysna (S.). Continuity of observed distribution is indicated by “to” between localities ; any considerable gap between recorded areas is indicated by a colon. (B.M.) = extreme locality fide H. W. Bell-Marley. (S.) = extreme locality fide J. L. B. Smith. Other limits as given by Barnard (° Ann. 8. Afr. Mus.’, vol. xxi, pp. 852-— 866, 1927). Nemacoclinus navalis Barnard. Nemacoclinus navalis Barnard, Ann. 8. Afr. Mus., vol. xxx, p. 646, fig. 1, 1935. Body compressed, elongate. Depth 5-8, head 4:5 in body length. Snout pointed, sub-conical. Hye 4-3, snout 4:4, and interorbital 7-5 in head length. 298 196 J. L. B. SMITH. Mouth moderate, maxilla extends to below middle of eye. Teeth in jaw subequal, minute teeth in a band on vomer. A short, apically dilated, fringed supraorbital tentacle. Mucous pores on head opening by a series of transversely opposed pores. D. XXXIV, 1 originates over hind preopercle margin. Anterior three spines widely spaced, first two remote from third. 1st and 4th spines shortest, scarcely greater than eye, remainder sub- equal about 1:7 times eye. Soft ray shorter than last spine; membrane reaches caudal base. A. II, 23; V, I, 3, inner ray small, adnate. Caudal rounded. Lateral line complete, almost to caudal base; tubes with transverse tubes above and below, each opening by a pore, exactly opposed. 80 cross tubules. CoLour.—Olive-green, mottled red-brown, fins greenish. LeNeTH.—66 mm. Locatity.—Great Fish Point. A single specimen, taken in a rock pool. This species has been known only from the type, taken at Simonstown. Its rediscovery at a point so far distant is of interest. Since the very intensive collecting of Clinids about the Cape Peninsula by the late W. Thompson, no new species have been taken in that area until navalis was discovered in 1934. Durmg the past six years I have collected Clinid fishes most intensively from a stretch of rocks at Great Fish Point, so that had navalis been a normal inhabitant of that area, it could scarcely have escaped detection. Actually my specimen was taken only a short time after the discovery of the orthotype at Simonstown. In the circumstances it might be supposed that navalis has but recently appeared on our coasts. Barnard has regarded navalis as generically distinct from Clinus Cuv. on the character of the lateral line, which in that latter genus is generally stated to have the lateral line tubes simple, opening by a single pore. Actually several species (e.g. capensis C. & V.) have at least the anterior portion of the lateral line of structure similar to that in Nemacoclinus. Our species of Clinus Cuwv. are in need of revision, since they fall into groups which appear to merit generic distinction, on 299 NEW RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISHES. 197 grounds at least as valid as those accepted by Barnard for genera such as Nemacoclinus Brnrd., Clinoporus Brnrd., and Petraites Ogilby. | Family GopiuD4a. Gobius callidus nom. nov. Gobius gulosus J. L. B. Smith, Trans. Roy. Soc. 8.A., vol. xxiv, pt. I, p. 49, fig. 2, 1936. It has been found that the name gulosus has previously been used for an American species of the genus, callidus is therefore proposed to replace gulosus for the South African species. I wish to express my gratitude to the Research Grant Board of South Africa (Carnegie Fund) for financial assistance in this work. Albany Museum, Grahamstown ; August, 1936. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI, Illustrating Dr. J. L. B. Smith’s paper, ‘‘ New Records of South African Fishes ”’. Holocentrum sammara fForsk. xX 1:7. Plicklk Ann. Natal Mus., Vol. VIII. ae oar | HOLOCENTRUM SAMMARA Forsk Ltd. Adlard & Son, INDEX TO VOLUMES | and Il Volume | ends at page 300 VALID SCIENTIFIC NAMES are in plain capitals. Page in heavy type shows a description on that page. Synonyms and Malidentifications are in italics. An asterisk shows that there is an illustration on that page in the text. Acanthidium natalense 272 ACAN THIDIUM QUADRISPINOSUM 270, ACANTHOCEPOLA 173 AGANTHOCEPOLA CUNEATUS 171-3 PI. ACANTHOCEPOLA LIMBATA 172 ACANTHOPAGRUS 307, 311, 313, 314-5, ACANTHOPAGRUS' BERDA 311, 314, 315—6*—7, 320 Pl. 18 ACANTHOPAGRUS BIFASCIATUS 311, 315, 317-8*—320 Pls. 18, 24 ACTINISTIA 389, 391, 393, 412*, 415 ACUMINATUS, CLINUS 11, 297 ACUTIPENNIS, GOBIUS 386 ADENI, PERISTEDION 69, 71-3 Pl. 22 AENEOFUSCUS, GOBIUS 233, 234 AEROSTATICUS, (TETRODON) 208 AESTUARIUS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 317 AESTUARIUS, GILCHRISTELLA 235 AENEUM, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363, 364 Pls. 22, 29; p. 526 AFER, BARBUS 267 AFRICANA, TRIGLA (TRIGLOPORUS) 73, 74-6 Pl. 23 AGILIS, CLINUS 10, 11 Pl. 16; p. 297 AGONOSTOMUS 79 ATBOFASCIATUS, BATRICHTHYS 59, 60 ALBULA VULPES 51 albus, Dentex 370, 373 ALEPISAURIDAE 154 ALEPISAURUS FEROX 154 ALGOAE, CAESIO 173 ALTAVELA, (PTEROPLATEA) 46, 47 ALUTERES 238, 240-1 ALUTERES MONOCEROS 238, 240, 241-4 Pls. 40, 41, 43 ALUTERES SCRIPTUS 240-1, 243-4 Pl. 42 ALUTERIDAE 238, 239 AMBLYAPISTUS BINOTATA 543 AMBLYAPISTUS MARLEYI 12 Amblyapistus marleyi 543 AMIA 501 Amphiprionichthys zeylonicus 13 AMPHIPRIONIDAE 183 ANABAS 230 ANABAS BAINSII 230, 231 Pl. 33 ANABAS CAPENSIS 230-1, 237 Pl. 33 ANABAS SCANDENS 230 ANABAS TESTUDINEUS 230 Anabas vicinus 231 ANABATIDAE 218, 230 ANGLICUS, CHR YSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1, 347-8*, 380 Pls. 19, 24; p. 526 ANGUILLA MOSSAMBICA 227 ANGUILLARIS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297 ANGUILLARIS, PLOTOSUS 226 Pl. 34 ANGUILLIDAE 218, 227 ANOPLUS, BARBUS 219, 220, 231 Pl. 29; p. 267 APHAREUS 535 APLOACTIDAE 202 AQUILA, (MYLIOBATIS) 147, 148 ARGENTATUS, (CLINUS) 197 ARGYROGRAMMICUS, PRISTIPO- MOIDES 28S, 286*-7 ARGYROPS 305, 311, 313, 333, 370, 525 ARGYROPS FILAMENTOSUS 311, 333- 335, 525 ARGYROPS SPINIFER 311, 333, 334-5 Pls. 20, 25; p. 525 ARGYROZONA 374, 378 argyrozona, Dentex 378 ARGYROZONA, POLYSTEGANUS 308%, 368, 374, 378 Pls. 21, 27 ARMATUS, (GRAMMONUS) 53 ATER, (GRAMMONUS) 53 ATHERINIDAE 156 ATLANTICUS, (HOPLOSTETHUS) 162 atricauda, (Sardinella) 150 auratus, Mugil 80-1, 106, 108, 120, 122-3 AURATA, (SPARUS) 314, 320 AURIVENTRIS, AUSTROSPARUS 308%, 311, 319-325*, 326*-7, 362 Pls. 18, 23; p. 512 auriventris, Austrosparus 545-548 auriventris, Diplodus 325, 547 AUROLINEATUS, GNATHODENTEX 398, 541 AUSTRALIS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 315, 320 . AUSTROSPARUS 307, 311, 313, 315, 319- 321, 327, 330, 545, 546-7 AUSTROSPARUS AURIVENTRIS 308%, 311, 319-325*, 326*—7, 362 Pls. 18, 23; p. 512 Austrosparus auriventris 545-548 AUSTROSPARUS GLOBICEPS 311, 320, 321-2*-3, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545, 546-9 AUSTROSPARUS SARBA 311, 319-323-4*, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545-6, 547-9 Austrosparus sarba 325 AUSTROSPARUS TRICUSPIDENS 546, 548-9 AXELIA 425, 447 AXELIA ROBUSTA 501, 505 AXILLARIS, (CAESIO) 174 Volume | ends at page 300 AXILLARIS, DASCYLLUS 183-5 PI. 22 AXINECEPS 374, 379 BAGRIDAE 218, 225 BAHIENSIS, (CYPSELURUS) 160 BAINSII, ANABAS 230, 231 PI. 33 BALINENSIS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3, 33-4 BALISTES CONSPICILLUM 210 BALISTIDAE 210, 238-240 BARBUS 218, 219 BARBUS AFER 267 BARBUS ANOPLUS 219, 220, 231 Pl. 29; BARBUS BROOKINGI 219, 221 Pl. 30 BARBUS BURCHELLI 219, 223 Pl. 30 BARBUS CAPENSIS 219, 221 Pl. 30 BARBUS GILCHRISTI 219, 222 Pl. 29 BARBUS HEMIPLEUROGRAMMA 219, 223 Pi. 29 BARBUS HOLUBI 216, 219, 222 Pl. 31 BARBUS PALUDINOSUS 219, 221 Pl. 30 BARBUS SENTICEPS 219, 220*, 266* BARBUS TREVELYANI 219 Pl. 29 BARBUS VULNERATUS 219, 223 Pl. 31 barnardi, Myxus 81, 90, 93 BARNARDI, SYNAPTURA 4, 5* Pl. 16 BATRACHOIDES 59 BATRACHOIDIDAE 49, 58 BATRICHTHYS 49, 58-9 BATRICHTHYS ALBOFASCIATUS 59, 60 belanak, Mugil 129 BENNETTI, (POMADASYS) 181, 182 BERDA, ACANTHOPAGRUS 311- 315-6*—7, 320 Pl. 18 BIDENICHTHYS 566 BIDENICHTHYS CAPENSIS 566 BIFASCIATUS, ACANTHOPAGRUS 31], 315, 317-8*—320 Pls. 18, 24 bifasciatus, (Austrosparus) 323, 547 BIFILUM, BLENNIUS 190-1 PI. 20 BINOTATA, AMBLYAPISTUS 543 bipinnulatus, Elacate 178 BITORQUATUS, GYMNOCRANIUS 536, 537 bleekeri, Doryichthys 49 BLENNIIDAE 8, 189, 295 BLENNIUS 191 BLENNIUS BIFILUM 190-1 Pl. 20 BLENNIUS CORNUTUS 189 BLENNIUS FASCIGULA 8 Pl. 16; p. 295 Blennius trifascigula 295 BLOCHI], PACHYMETOPON 311, 363-4 Pls. 22, 28, 29 BOOPSOIDEA 304-5, 311, 350, 351 BOOPSOIDEA INORNATA 311, 351-2 Pls. 22, 28 borneensis, Mugil 120 BORO, PISOODONOPHIS 273 BOX 304-5 BRACHYCEPHALUS, CLINUS 11, 297 BRACHYURUS, MICROPHIS 49*, 50 BREVIORISTATUS, CLINUS 11, 297 BREVIPINNIS, SCYMNORHINUS 253-4*-5 BROOKINGI, BARBUS 219, 221 Pl. 30 BROTULA PALMIETENSIS 198 Pl. 21 BROTULIDAE 52-3, 198, 306, 566 BUCHANANI, MUGIL 81-2, 89, 113-4*-5, 131 Pls. 16, 20 BURCHELLI, BARBUS 219, 223 Pl. 30 caeruleomaculatus, Mugil 95, 113, 115 CAERULEOMACULATUS, MUGIL 128, 130-1 CAESIO ALGOAE 173 calabaricus, (Hemirhamphus) 36, 39 calabaricus schlegeli, Hemirhamphus 39 CALLIDUS, GOBIUS 223-4*, 299 CALLIONYMIDAE 165 CANADUS, RHACHICENTRUM 177-8 CANALICULATUS, MUGIL 81-2, 89, 113, 120—2*-3, 130, 132 Pls. 16, 17, 18 CANARIENSIS, (PTEROPLATEA) 46 CANESCENS, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363-4 CANTHARUS 304 CAPENSIS, ANABAS 230-1, 237 Pl. 33 CAPENSIS, BARBUS 219, 221 Pl. 30 CAPENSIS, BIDENICHTHYS 566 capensis, Champsodon 192 CAPENSIS, CHELIDONICHTHYS 68 CAPENSIS, CLINUS 11, 297-8 capensis, Coracinus 138, 144 CAPENSIS, DICHISTIUS 137-139, 143-6 PI. 13; p. 301-2 Pl. 10; p. 557-8*-9 CAPENSIS, DIPLODUS 150, 331 capensis, Dipterodon 138-9, 144 CAPENSIS, HIPPOCAMPUS 149, 150 CAPENSIS, LABEO 224 Pl. 31 CAPENSIS, MERLUCCIUS 158, 206 capensis, Mugil 108, 110 CAPITO, MUGIL 79, 83, 88, 102, 103—4*-5*-7, 110, 13] Pls. 17, 19 CARACANTHUS ZEYLONICUS 13 CARANGIDAE 174, 279 CARANTHUS 304-5 CARANX 280 CARANX GYMNOSTETHOIDES 279, 280 CARPIO, CYPRINUS 224 cauda lunata, (Coracinus) 138 CENTRARCHIDAE 218, 237 cephalotus, (Mugil) 90 CEPHALUS, MUGIL 79, 81, 83, 88, 90, 91*-5, 123, 130, 132 Pl. 15; p. 232* CEPOLIDAE 171 CERVINUS, DIPLODUS 170 CERVUS, MYLIOBATIS 147, 148* CESTRAEUS 79 CETOMIMIDAE 158 CETOMIMUS PICKLEI 158-9 ceylonensis, Mugil 81, 113, 115 Chaetodipterus 188 CHAETODIPTERUS 246 Chaetodipterus faber 187-8 Chaetodipterus goreensis 188, 248, 250-2 Chaetodipterus orbis 188, 250 Chaetodon cingulatus 284 CHAETODON KLEINII 284 CHAETODON MARLEYI 176-7 Pl. 22 Chaetodon nigripinnatus 282, 284 CHAETODON SETIFER 247 CHAETODON TRIFASCIATUS 280-1 CHAETODON XANTHOCEPHALUS 282-3* CHAETODONTIDAE 176, 246-7, 280 Volume | ends at page 300 CHALUMNAE, LATIMERIA 387-8*-390, 391-4 Pls. 3-7, 403-5*—7*-8-409-415 Pls. 1-3; p. 425-426-522 19 figs. 44 pls. CHAMPSODON CAPENSIS 192 CHARAX 304-5 CHEIMERIUS 368, 370 CHEIMERIUS NUFAR 368, 370-1*-3 Pls. 21, 27 CHELIDONICHTHYS 61, 68 CHELIDONICHTHYS CAPENSIS 68 CHELIDONICHTHYS KUMU 68 CHELIDONICHTHYS QUEKETTI 68* CHILENSIS, SARDA 293, 294*-5 CHORISOCHISMUS DENTEX 563 CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 314, 320, 331, 335, 338, 339-40, 551 CHRYSOBLEPHUS ANGLICUS 311, 340-1, 347-8*, 380 Pls. 19, 24; p. 526 CHRYSOBLEPHUS CRISTICEPS 311, 340— 342*-7 Pls. 20, 26; pp. 551, 552*-6 Chrysoblephus cristiceps 343 CHRYSOBLEPHUS GIBBICEPS 311, 337, 340-1, 345-7 Pls. 19, 26 CHRYSOBLEPHUS LATICEPS 311, 340, 341 Pls. 19, 26 CHRYSOBLEPHUS LOPHUS 311, 340-1, 346-7, 551 CHRYSOBLEPHUS PUNICEUS 311, 340-1, 343-4*_5, 526, 551-2, 554-5*-6 CHRYSOPHRYS 304 Chrysophrys haffara 547 Chrysophrys natalensis 323, 547 Chrysophrys sarba 547 CICHLIDAE 84, 218, 228 CILIARIS, PAGRUS 334 cingulatus, Chaetodon 284 CLARIAS 225 CLARIAS GARIEPINUS 225 CLINIDAE 10, 195, 296 CLINOPORUS 299 CLINUS 51, 197, 296-8 CLINUS ACUMINATUS 297 CLINUS AGILIS 10-1 Pl. 16; p. 297 CLINUS ANGUILLARIS 297 CLINUS BRACHYCEPHALUS 11, 297 CLINUS BREVICRISTATUS 11, 297 CLINUS CAPENSIS 11, 297-8 CLINUS COTTOIDES 297 CLINUS DORSALIS 11, 297 CLINUS FUCORUM 297 CLINUS HETERODON 195 PI. 22; pp. 296-7 CLINUS LATIPENNIS 297 . CLINUS LAURENTII 196—8*, 297 CLINUS MENTALIS 197, 297 CLINUS MUS 1], 297 CLINUS ORNATUS 11, 197, 297 CLINUS PAVO 11, 297 CLINUS ROBUSTUS 196, 297 CLINUS STRIATUS 11, 197, 297 CLINUS SUPERCILIOSUS 11, 297 CLINUS TAURUS 196, 297 CLINUS VENUSTRIS 196, 297 CLUPEIDAE 150, 218, 235 COCCOTROPUS 202 COCCOTROPUS JUBATUS 201 Pl. 18 COELACANTH = see LATIMERIA CHALUMNAE COELACANTHIDAE 388*-9, 393-4, 413-4*_5, 420-422 COELACANTHUS GRANULATUS 437 COERULEOPUNCTATUS, POLYSTEGA- NUS 368, 373, 374-6 Pls. 22, 28 commersoni, (Hemirhamphus) 24 COMMERSONI, (SCOMBEROMORUS) 189 COMPRESSUS, MUGIL 81, 89, 115—7*-8, 131 Pls. 17, 20 CONGIOPODUS TORVUS 51 CONSPICILLUM, BALISTES 210 conspicillum, Pachynathus.210 constantiae, Mugil 90 Coracinus 137-8 Coracinus capensis 138, 144 CORNUTA, (MYLIOBATIS) 147 CORNUTUS, BLENNIUS 189 CORYPHAENOIDIDAE 154 CORYZICHTHYS 59, 60 COTTOIDES, CLINUS 11, 297 CRENIDENS 304-5, 311, 357, 360 CRENIDENS CRENIDENS 311, 360, 361* Pls. 22, 26 CRENIDENS, CRENIDENS 311, 360, 361* Pls. 22, 26 CRENILABIS, MUGIL 88, 99*, 100, 130, 274-5 CRISTICEPS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1, 342*-7 Pls. 20, 26; pp. 551, 552*-6 cristiceps, Chrysoblephus 343 CRISTICEPS, POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTOMETOPON) 527*, 528-9*, 530*-2 Pl. 50 CROSSOPTERYGII 411, 412*, 415 CUBICEPS NATALENSIS 200 CUNEATUS, ACANTHOCEPOLA | 171-3 Pl. 21 CUNNESIUS, MUGIL 129, 130 cunnesius, Mugil 81, 96, 98 CURVIDENS, GYMNOCROTAPHUS 311, 358* CUVIERI, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 315 CYMATOCEPS 311, 314, 337-8 CYMATOCEPS NASUTUS 311-2, 338-9*, 382 Pls. 20, 25; p. 512 CYPRINODONTIDAE 272 CYPRINIDAE 218, 266 CYPRINUS 218, 224 CYPRINUS CARPIO 224 CYPSELURUS HEWITTI 159 CYPSILURUS 26 DALATIAS 253 DALATIAS LICHA 255 DALGLEISHI, XENOLEPIDICHTHYS 162-3 Pl. 18 DARWINI, GEPHYROBERYX 162 DASCYLLUS AXILLARIS 183-5 Pl. 22 DASYBATIDAE 43 DECAPTERUS LAJANG 174-5 PI. 21 DELAGOAE, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3, 31-4 Pls. 10, 12 DELAGOAE, NEMIPTERUS 542 DENTATA, PORCOSTOMA 311, 349, 350 Pls. 20, 25 DENTEX 183, 304-5, 367-8, 370, 373, 381, 399, 533, 536 Dentex albus 370, 373 Dentex argyrozona 378 DENTEX, CHORISOCHISMUS 563 Volume | ends at page 300 Dentex filamentosus 399 Dentex filosus 370, 372, 376, 556 Dentex lineopunctatus 374-6 DENTEX MATSUBARAE 367 Dentex miles 370, 373 Dentex natalensis 374 Dentex nufar 370, 371, 373 DENTEX PERONII 367 Dentex rivulatus 533, 537, 541 Dentex robinsoni 533, 537 Dentex rupestris 371 Dentex variabilis 37\ DENTICIDAE 303, 308*-9, 337, 366-8, 381, 532-534, 556 DERMATOPSIS 566, 568 DERMATOPSIS KASOUGAE 566—7*-8 DERMATOPSIS MICRODON 568 DERMATOPSIS MULTIRADIATUS 568 DIABOLUS, MOBULA 561, 569 diadema, Mugil 81, 115, 117-8 DIAPHUS 17-19 (DIAPHUS) ELUCENS, MYCTOPHUM 152—3* DICHISTIIDAE 135, 137, 301, 557 DICHISTIUS 135, 136, 137, 138, 302 DICHISTIUS CAPENSIS 137-139, 140, 143-6 Pl. 13; pp. 301-2 Pl. 10; pp. 557-8 *-9 DICHISTIUS FALCATUS 138-9, 141, 142-4 146 Pls. 14, 17 DICHISTIUS MULTIFASCIATUS — 138-9, 141, 144-6 Pls. 15, 16 DIPLOCERCIDES 421 DIPLOCERCIDES KAYSERI 477 DIPLODUS 304-5, 307, 311, 313-5, 319, 321, 327, 330-1, 546 Diplodus auriventris 325, 547 Diplodus capensis 150 DIPLODUS CERVINUS 170 DIPLODUS SARGUS 311, 320, 331-2* Pls. 19, 24 DIPLODUS TRIFASCIATUS 311, 33), 332-3* Pls. 19, 24 Dipterodon \37-8 Dipterodon capensis 138-9, 144 DORSALIS, CLINUS 11, 297 Doryichthys bleekeri 49 DREPANE 137, 245-6, 252 DREPANIDAE 245-247 Drepanoscorpis 137-8, 146 Drepanoscorpis gilchristi 138, 144, 146 Dulosparus 334 DURBANENSIS, SPARODON 311, 321, 328-9 *-330 Pls. 18, 23 durbanensis, Sparus 328 DUSSUMIERI, HEMIRHAMPHUS 23, 30-1, 34 ECHINORHINIDAE 253 ECHINORHINUS 253 ECKLONIACHTHYS 561 ECKLONIAICHTHYS SCYLLIORHINI- CEPS 561-2*-3 Elacate 178 Elacate bipinnulatus 178 Elacate nigra 177 Elagatis 178 ELEOTRIDAE 264 ELEOTRIS LIMOSUS 264-5 Pls. 4, 5 ELEOTRIS MADAGASCARIENSIS 265 ELEOTRIS OPHIOCEPHALUS 265 ELOPS 79 ELUCENS, MYCTOPHUM (DIAPHUS) 152-3* EMARGINATUM, SPONDYLIOSOMA 311, 362 Pls. 22, 29 engeli, Mugil 97-8 EPHIPPIDAE 245-6 EPHIPPINAE 248 EPHIPPUS 245-7, 248*-9 . EPINEPHELUS 80 EPINEPHELUS FLAVOCAERULEUS 168 Pl. 22 ERYTHRORINCHUS, PHUS) 31 EURONOTUS, MUGIL 81-4, 88, 100-1 *-3, 110, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 16, 17, 19; p. 232*, 233 EXOCOETIDAE 41, 159 (HEMIRHAM- faber, Chaetodipterus 187-8 FALCATUS, DICHISTIUS 138-9, 141, 142-4, 146 Pls. 14, 16 FALCIFORMIS, MONODACTYLUS 235 Pl. 34 FAR, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3, 24-8, 30, 40 Pls. 10, 12 FARIO FARIO, SALMO 236, 237 FARIO IRIDEUS, SALMO 236, 237 FARIO, SALMO FARIO 236, 237 fasciatus, Hemirhamphus 24, 27 FASCIGULA, BLENNIUS 8 PI. 16; p. 295 FAUREI, LEPIDOTRIGLA 62, 63-5 Pls. 16, 18, 19 FEROX, ALEPISAURUS 154 fidjiensis, (Setarches) 57, 58 FILAMENTOSUS, ARGYROPS 311, 333- 335, 525 filamentosus, Dentex 399 filamentosus, Pristipomoides 287 filosus, Dentex 370, 372, 376, 556 FITZSIMONSI, HALIEUTEA 211-2 PI. 23 fitzsimonsi, Halieutichthys 211 FLAVOCAERULEUS, EPINEPHELUS 168 Pl. 22 FLORENTII, MYCTOPHUM (NASO- LYCHNUS) 18 Pl. 9 frenatus, Gymnocranius 536, 537 FUCORUM, CLINUS 11, 297 GADIDAE 158, 306 GALAXIAS 236 GALAXIAS ZEBRATUS 236 PI. 34 GALAXIIDAE 218, 236 GARIEPINUS, CLARIAS 225 GEMPYLIDAE 291 GEORGII, (HEMIRHAMPHUS) 38 GEPHYROBERYX DARWINI 162 GEPHYROGLANIS 225, 226 GEPHYROGLANIS SCLATERI 226 PI. 33 GERMANUM, POLYAMBLYODON 311, 366 GERMANUS, POLYAMBLYODON (POLYAMBLYODON) 527, 528 GIBBICEPS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 337, 340-1, 345-7 Pls. 19, 26 GIBBOSUM, PACHYMETOPON 526-7 Volume | ends at page 300 GIBBOSUS, LACTOPHRYS 209 GIBBOSUS, POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTO- METOPON) 528 531 gigas, (Myctophum) 152-3 GILCHRISTELLA 235 GILCHRISTELLA AESTUARIUS 235 GILCHRISTI, BARBUS 219, 222 Pl. 29 gilchristi, Drepanoscorpis 138, 144, 146 GILCHRISTI, HOPLOSTETHUS 160-2 PI. 22 GIRELLIDAE 135-6, 246, 305, 360 GIURIS, GOBIUS 233, 234, 263 GLAUCOSOMA PEAOLOPESI 396-7* GLAUCUM, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363, 365—6 GLOBICEPS, AUSTROSPARUS 311, 320, 321-2*—3, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545, 546-9 GNATHODENTEX 534-6, 541 GNATHODENTEX AUROLINEATUS 398 GOBIESOCIDAE 561 GOBIIDAE 193, 218, 233, 259, 299, 385, 564 GOBIUS 194, 233 GOBIUS ACUTIPENNIS 386 GOBIUS AENEOFUSCUS 233, 234 GOBIUS CALLIDUS 233, 234*, 299 GOBIUS GIURIS 233, 234, 263 GOBIUS GULOSUS 261-2*-3, 299 GOBIUS KEIENSIS 385-6* GOBIUS VONBONDEI 259-261 * Pls. 3, 5 goreensis, Chaetodipterus 188, 248, 250-2 gracile, Peristedion 69-71 GANGENE, (CORYZICHTHYS) 59, 60 graminis, (Clinus) 195 GRAMMICOLEPIDAE 1, 162, 187 GRAMMONUS 52 GRAMMONUS OPISTHODON 82 PI. 6 GRANDE, PACHYMETOPON 311, 363, 365-6, 526 GRANDOCULIS, (MONOTAXIS) 542 GRANUALTUS, COELACANTHUS 437 GRISEUS, GYMNOCRANIUS 532-3, 536, 537, 539*-541 Pl. 58 GRUNNIENS, (BATRICHTHYS) 59 GUENTHERI, (SETARCHES) 58 GULOSUS, GOBIUS 261-2*-3, 299 GUNTHERI, SETARCHES 57-8 Pl. 6 GURNADUS, (TRIGLA) 73-5 GYMNOCRANIUS 305, 307-369, 532-536-7, 541-2 GYMNOCRANIUS BITORQUATUS 536, 537 Gymnocranius frenatus 536-7 GYMNOCRANIUS GRISEUS 532-3, 536, 537, 539*-541 Pl. 58 Gymnocranius microdon 536-1 Gymnocranius rivulatus 533 GYMNOCRANIUS ROBINSONI 368, 369 Pls. 21, 27; p. 532 Gymnocranius robinsoni 533, 536-7, 541 GYMNOCRANIUS RUPPELLII 533, 537, 541 GYMNOCROTAPHUS 304-5, 311, 357, 358, 529 GYMNOCROTAPHUS CURVIDENS 311, 358* GYMNOSTETHOIDES, CARANX 279, 280 haffara, Chrysophrys 547 HALIEUTEA 212 HALIEUTEA FITZSIMONSI 211-2 PI. 23 HALIEUTICHTHYS 212 Halieutichthys fitzsimonsi 211 HAPLOCHILUS KATANGAE 272 HAPLOCHILUS MYAPOSAE 273 HAPLOCHROMIS 230 HAPLOCHROMIS MOFFATI 230 Pl. 32 HAPLODACTYLUS, (SCORPAENA) 203 HEMIPLEUROGRAMMA, BARBUS 219, 223 Pl. 29 . HEMIRHAMPHIDAE 40-2 HEMIRHAMPHUS 21-2, 40-1 HEMIRHAMPHUS BALINENSIS 22-3, 33-4 Hemirhamphus calabaricus schlegeli 39 HEMIRHAMPHUS DELAGOAE 22-3, 31-4 Pls. 10, 12 HEMIRHAMPHUS DUSSUMIERI 23, 30-1, 34 | HEMIRHAMPHUS FAR 22-3, 24-8, 30, 40 Pls. 10, 12 Hemirhamphus fasciatus 24, 27 HEMIRHAMPHUS IMPROVISUS 22, 24, 34-5*-6, 38 Pl. 11 HEMIRHAMPHUS KNYSNAENSIS 22, 24, 35*, 36-8, 40 Pls. 10, 11 HEMIRHAMPHUS MARGINATUS 22-3, 27-29 HEMIRHAMPHUS SCHLEGELI 22, 24, 35-6, 38, 39, 40 HETERODON, CLINUS 195 PI. 22; p. 296-7 HEWITTI, CYPSELURUS 159 HEWITTI, PRIONOLEPIS 1, 3* hewitti, Prionolepis 187 HIPPOCAMPUS CAPENSIS 149, 150 hoefleri, Mugil 122 HOLOCENTRIDAE 275 HOLOCENTRUM SAMMARA 275 PI. 11 HOLUBI, BARBUS 216, 219, 222 PI. 31 HOLUBI, SARGUS 327 HOPLEGNATHIDAE 169 HOPLEGNATHUS ROBINSONI 169-170 Pl. 18 HOPLOSTETHUS GILCHRISTI 160-2 Pi. 22 HORRIDA, SYNANCEIA 543-4 Hyporhamphus 2\-2 IMPROVISUS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22, 24, 34-6, 38 Pl. 11 INDICA, (ACANTHOCEPOLA) 172 INDICUS, PLATYCEPHALUS 204-6 PI. 20 INDICUS, PSENES 53 INORNATA, BOOPSOIDEA 311, 351-2 Pls. 22, 28 | insidator, Platycephalus 204 IRIDEUS, SALMO FARIO 236, 237 ISO NATALENSIS 156-7 ITOSIBI, NEOTHUNNUS 185* JACKSONI, TAENIOIDES 564—5*—6 JABATUS, COCCOTROPUS 201 PI. 18 KASOUGAE, DERMATOPSIS 566—7*-8 KATANGAE, HAPLOCHILUS 272 KAYSERI, DIPLOCERCIDES 477 Volume | ends at page 300 KEIENSIS, GOBIUS 385-6* kelaartii, Mugil 97-8 KLEINII, CHAETODON 284 KNYSNAENSIS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22, 24, 35*, 36-8, 40 Pls. 10, 11 KNYSNAENSIS, PSAMMOGOBIUS 1934 KNYSNAENSIS, SERRANUS 167 KOWIENSIS, SCORPAENA 202-3 KUDA, (HIPPOCAMPUS) 150 kuhli, Mobula 569 KUMU, CHELIDONICHTHYS 68 K YPHOSIDAE 135-7, 247 305 KYPHOSUS 136-7 LABEO 218, 224 LABEO CAPENSIS 224 PI. 31 LABEO UMBRATUS 224, 225 PI. 31 LABIOSUS, MUGIL 129-30 LABRIDAE 289 LACTOPHRYS 210 LACTOPHRYS GIBBOSUS 209 LACTOPHRYS QUADRICORNIS 209 Pl. 22 Lactoria 210 LAGOCEPHALUS, TETRODON 207-8 PI. 20 LAJANG, DECAPTERUS 174-5 Pl. 21 LAMPADENA 17 LAMPANYCTUS 17 LANIARIUS, PTEROGYMNUS 311, 335, 336*—7 Pls. 19, 25; p. 526 LATICEPS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340, 341 Pls. 19, 26 LATIMERIA 422-6, 461, 471, 501 LATIMERIA CHALUMNAE 387-8*-390, 391-4 Pls. 3-7; pp. 403-S*—7*-8, 409-415 Pls. 1-3; pp. 425, 426-522 19 figs, 44 pis. LATIPENNIS, CLINUS 297 LATOVITTATUS, MALACANTHUS 395 LATUS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 315 LAURENTII, CLINUS 196—8*, 297 laurentii, Petraites 196 LEPIDOTRIGLA 61, 64 LEPIDOTRIGLA FAUREI 62, 63-5 Pls. 16, 18, 19 LEPIDOTRIGLA MULTISPINOSUS 62, 66—7 Pls. 17, 20 LEPIDOTRIGLA NATALENSIS 62, 64, 65 Pls. 16, 18, 19 LEPTOCEPHALUS 227-8 LEPTOMETOPON 528 (LEPTOMETOPON) CRISTICEPS, POLY- AMBLYODON 527*, 528—9*, 530*-2 Pl. 50 (LEPTOMETOPON) GIBBOSUS, POLY- AMBLYODON 828, 531 LETHRINIDAE 533-535 licha, Dalatias 255 LICHA, SCYMNORHINUS 255 lichia, Scymnorhinus 255 LIMBATA, ACANTHOCEPOLA 172 LIMOSUS, ELEOTRIS 264-5 Pls. 4, 5 LINEATA, (TRIGLA) 73-6 LINEOLATUS, SCOMBEROMORUS 188-9 LINEOLATUS, (SYNCHIROPUS) 167 lineopunctatus, Dentex 374-6 liogaster, (Halieutea) 211-2 LIONURUS NASUTUS 154-5* LIRUS 56 LITHOGNATHUS 311, 351-2, 354 LITHOGNATHUS LITHOGNATHUS 311, 350, 354, 355 LITHOGNATHUS, LITHOGNATHUS 311, 350, 354, 355 LITHOGNATHUS MORMYRUS 311, 355, 356* Pls. 20, 29 LITHOGNATHUS, PAGELLUS 182 LITHOPHILUS, NEOSCORPIS 7 Liza 79 longimanus, Mugil 96-8, 113 LOPHUS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1, 346-7, 551 lophus, Sparus 340 LOUTI, VARIOLA 542 LUTIANIDAE 173, 285, 396, 532-535 MACROLEPIS, MUGIL 89, 118-9*, 120, 131 Pl. 20 macrolepis, Mugil 115, 118 MACROPOMA 389, 425 MACROSOMA, (DECAPTERUS) 175 MADAGASCARIENSIS, ELEOTRIS 265 madagascariensis, Sparus 315 MALACANTHIDAE 395 MALACANTHUS LATOVITTATUS 395 MARCGRAVIA 59 MARCOSTOMUS, OPISTHOGNATHUS (= MACROSTOMUS, O) 164 PI. 20 MARGINATA, (SYNAPTURA) 6 MARGINATUS, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22-3, 27-29 marginatus, (Hemirhamphus) 24 MARGINATUS, OPHICHTHYS 151 marginatus, Ophiurus 151 MARLEYI, AMBLYAPISTUS 12 marleyi, Amblyapistus 543 MARLEYI, CHAETODON 176-7 PI. 22 MARLEYI, TAENIOLABRUS 256-8 Pls. 1, 2 MARLEYI, THYRSITOIDES 291-2 MATSUBARE, DENTEX 367 MEDITERRANEUS, (HOPLOSTETHUS) 162 MEDUSOPHAGUS, SCHEDOPHILUS 55-7 PI. 5 MELANURA, SARDINELLA 150-1 melinopterus, Mugil 125, 128 MENTALIS, CLINUS 197, 297 MERLUCCIUS CAPENSIS 158, 206 MESOPRION, (NEMIPTERUS) 401-2 MICRODON, DERMATOPSIS 568 microdon, Gymnocranius 536-7 MICRODON, PRISTIPOMOIDES 287 microlepis, Spondyliosoma 362 MICROPHIS BRACHYURUS 49*, 50 MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES 237 Micropus zeylonicus 13 MICRURA, (PTEROPLATEA) 43-4 miles, Dentex 370, 373 MOBULA DIABOLUS 561, 569 Mobula kuhli 569 MOBULIDAE 568 MOFFATI, HAPLOCHROMIS 230 Pl. 32 MONACANTHIDAE 206, 238-240 MONACANTHINAE 238 MONACANTHUS SETIFER 206-7 Pl. 19 MONACANTHUS, SYNCHIROPUS 165 MONOCEROS, ALUTERES 238, 240, 241-4 Pls. 40, 41, 42 Volume | ends at page 300 MONOCEROS UNICORNIS 51, 187 MONODACTYLIDAE 218, 235 MONODACTYLUS 235 MONODACTYLUS FALCIFORMIS 235 Pi. 34 MONOGRAMMA, SCOLOPSIS 51 MONOTAXIS 534-5, 542 MORMYRUS, LITHOGNATHUS 311, 355, 356* Pls. 20, 29 MOSSAMBICA, ANGUILLA 227 MUGIL 44, 77-83, 85*, 87*, (130), 231 Mugil auratus 80-1, 106, 108, 120, 122-3 Mugil belanak 129 Mugil borneensis 120 MUGIL BUCHANANI 81-2, 89, 113-4*-S, 131 Pls. 16, 20 MUGIL CAERULEOMACULATUS | 128, 130-1 Mugil caeruleomaculatus 95, 113, 115 MUGIL CANALICULATUS 81-2, 89, 113, 120-2*-3, 130, 132 Pls. 16, 17, 18 Mugil capensis 108, 110 MUGIL CAPITO 79, 83, 88, 102, 103—4*-5*-7, 110, 131 Pls. 17, 19 MUGIL CEPHALUS 79, 81, 83, 88, 90-1 *-S, 123, 130, 132 Pl. 15; p. 232* Mugil ceylonensis 81, 113, 115 MUGIL COMPRESSUS 81, 89, 115—7*-8, 131 Pls. 17, 20 Mugil constantiae 90 MUGIL CRENILABIS 88, 99*, 100, 130, 274-5 MUGIL CUNNESIUS 129, 130 Muzgil cunnesius 81, 96, 98 Mugil diadema 81, 115, 117-8 Mugil engeli97-8 | MUGIL EURONOTUS 81-4, 88, 100, 101 *-—3, 110, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 16, 17, 19; p. 232*, 233 Mugil hoefleri 122 Mugil kelaartii 97-8 MUGIL LABIOSUS 129, 130 Mugil longimanus 96-8, 113 . MUGIL MACROLEPIS 89, 118-9*, 120, 131 Pl. 20 Mugil macrolepis 115, 118 Mugil melinopterus 125, 128 Mugil multilineatus 108, 110 Mugil nepalensis 128 Mugil oeur 90, 92 MUGIL OLIGOLEPIS 81, 89, 118, 125—7*-8, 131 Pls. 21, 22 Mugil olivaceus 120 Mugil parsia 129 Mugil planiceps 129 MUGIL ROBUSTUS 88-90, 93-4*-5, 115, 130-1 Pls. 21, 22 Mugil ruppellii 100 Mugil saliens 81, 100, 102, 106-8, 110 MUGIL SEHELI 89, 95, 111-2*-3, 123, 131 Pls. 16, 18 MUGIL SPEIGLERI 128-9-130 Mugil speigleri 81, 120, 122 MUGIL S TRONGYLOCEPHALUS 81, 83, 88, 93, 96—7*-8, 113, 130 Pls. 16, 18 MUGIL TADE 129, 130 MUGIL TRICUSPIDENS 81, 83-4, 88, 93, 108—9*—10, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 17, 18 Mugil troscheli 120 MUGIL WAIGIENSIS 89, 123-4*-S, 131 Pi. 20 MUGILIDAE 41, 77, 218, 231, 274 MUGILIDAE, Abbreviated key to 130 MULLOIDES, NEMIPTERUS 399, 400*-2 mulloides, Nemipterus 542 MULTIFASCIATUS, DICHISTIUS 138-9, 141, 144-6 Pls. 15, 16 multilineatus, Mugil 108, 110 MULTIRADIATUS, DERMATOPSIS 568 MULTISPINOSUS, LEPIDOTRIGLA 62, 66—7 Pls. 17, 20 MUS, CLINUS 11, 297 MYAPOSAE, HAPLOCHILUS 273 MYCTOPHIDAE 17, 152 MYCTOPHUM 17 MYCTOPHUM (DIAPHUS) ELUCENS 152-3* MYCTOPHUM (NASOLYCHNUS) FLO- RENTII 18 Pl. 9 MYLIOBATIDAE 147 MYLIOBATIS CERVUS 147-8* Myxus 77-9, 81 Myxus barnardi 81, 90, 93 NASOLYCHNUS 18 (NASOLYCHNUS) FLORENTI, MYCTO- PHUM 18 PI. 9 NASUTUS, CYMATOCEPS 311-2, 338-9*, 382 Pls. 20, 25; p. 512 NASUTUS, LIONURUS 154-5* NASUTUS, PAGRUS 182-3 PI. 23 natalense, Acanthidium 272 natalensis, Chrysophrys 323, 547 NATALENSIS, CUBICEPS 200 natalensis, Dentex 374 NATALENSIS ISO 156-7 NATALENSIS, LEPIDOTRIGLA 62, 64, 65 Pls. 16, 18, 19 NATALENSIS, PAGELLUS 311, 352-3*4 Pis. 20, 29 natalensis, Polysteganus 376 NATALENSIS, PTEROPLATEA 43-45*, 47 Pl. 4 NATALENSIS, TILAPIA 229 Pl. 32 NAVALIS, NEMACOCLINUS 297-8 NEMACOCLINUS 298-9 NEMACOCLINUS NEVALIS 297-8 NEMIPTERIDAE 399, 533-535, 542 NEMIPTERUS 399 NEMIPTERUS DELAGOAE 542 NEMIPTERUS MULLOIDES 399, 400*-2, 542 NEOSCORPIS 6, 136, 137 NEOSCORPIS LITHOPHILUS 7 NEOTHUNNUS 187 NEOTHUNNUS ITOSIBI 185* nepalensis, Mugil 128 NESIDES 421 NIERSTRASZI, (PERISTEDION) 71 nigra, Elacate 177 nigripinnatus, Chaetodon 282, 284 NIGROMARGINATUS, (OPISTHOGNA- THUS) 165 NOCT, (DIPLODUS) 331 NUFAR, CHEIMERIUS 368, 370—1*-3 Pls. 21, 27 nufar, Dentex 370-1, 373 Volume | ends at page 300 nufar, Polysteganus 371 obliteratus, (Aluteres) 241 oeur, Mugil 90, 92 OLIGOLEPIS, MUGIL 81, 89, 118, 125—7*-8, 131 Pls. 21, 22 olivaceus, Mugil 120 ONCHOCEPHALIDAE 211 OPERCULARE, POMADASYS 179-182 OPERCULARIS, PTERAGOGUS 289, 290* OPHICHTHYIDAE 151, 273 OPHICHTHYS MARGINATUS 151 OPHIOCEPHALUS, ELEOTRIS 265 Ophiurus marginatus 151 OPISTHODON, GRAMMONUS 82 PI. 4 OPISTHOGNATHIDAE 164 OPISTHOGNATHUS MARCOSTOMUS (= MACROSTOMUS) 164 PI. 20 ORBICULARIS, (PLATAX) 249 orbis, Chaetodipterus 188, 250 ORBIS, TRIPTERODON 187-8, 245, 248- 250*—2 Pls. 21-23; p. 542-3 ORNATUS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297 Osbeckia 240 Osbeckia scriptus 243 OSTRACION 210 OSTRACIONTIDAE 209 Ostracion turritus 209 OXYLOPHIUS, TROPIDICHTHYS 15 Pl. 16 PACHYMETOPON 305, 311, 357, 362, 364, 526 PACHYMETOPON AENEUM 311, 363, 364 Pls. 22, 29; p. 526 PACHYMETOPON BLOCHII 311, 363, 364 Pls. 22, 28, 29 PACHYMETOPON CANESCENS 311, 363-4 PACHYMETOPON GIBBOSUM 526-7 PACHYMETOPON GLAUCUM 311, 363, 365, 366 PACHYMETOPON GRANDE 311, 363, 365-6, 526 Pachynathus conspicillum 210 PAGELLINAE 310-11, 350 PAGELLUS 304-5, 311, 351, 352, 354 PAGELLUS LITHOGNATHUS 182 PAGELLUS NATALENSIS 311, 352-3*-4 Pls. 20, 29 PAGRUS 183, 304—5, 317, 319, 349 PAGRUS CILIARIS 334 PAGRUS NASUTUS 182-3 Pl. 23 PALMIETENSIS, BROTULA 198 PI. 21 PALUDINOSUS, BARBUS 219, 221 Pl. 30 PAPYRICHTHYS 49, 53-4 PAPYRICHTHYS PELLUCIDUS 54-5 PI. 6A PARAPERCIS PULCHELLA 276-7*-9 Parapercis robinsoni 279 PARASCORPIS 136 parmatus, (Setarches) 57-8 Parsia, Mugil 129 PAVO, CLINUS 11, 297 PEAOLOPESI, GLAUCOSOMA 396-7* Pelecinomimus 159 Pelecinomimus picklei 158 PELLUCIDUS, PAPYRICHTHYS 54-5 P}. 6 pellucidus, Psenes 53-4 PENTAPODIDAE 534, 535, 342 PENTAPODUS 534-4, 541 PERISTEDION 61, 69 PERISTEDION ADENI 69, 71-3 Pl. 22 Peristedion gracile 69-7) PERISTEDION WEBERI 69-71, 73 Pl. 21 PERONII, DENTEX 367 PETRAITES 299 Petraites 197 Petraites laurentii 196 PETROSCIRTES TAPEINOSOMA 51, 191-2 Pl. 21; p. 296 PETRUS 366-8, 380-1 PETRUS RUPESTRIS 368, 381, 382* Pls. 21, 27 PICKLEI, CETOMIMUS 158-9 picklei, Pelecinomimus 158 PINGUIPEDIDAE 276 PINNATUS, (PLATAX) 249 PISOODONOPHIS BORO 273 planiceps, Mugil 129 PLATACIDAE 187, 247, 248, 542 PLATACINAE 247, 248 PLATAX 137, 245-249, 252 PLATYCEPHALIDAE 204 PLATYCEPHALUS INDICUS 204-6 PI. 20 Platycephalus insidator 204 PLECTORHYNCHIDAE SO, 179, 287 PLOTOSIDAE 218, 226 PLOTOSUS ANGUILLARIS 226 PI. 34 POLYAMBLYODON 305, 311, 357, 362, 366, 526-8 POLYAMBLYODON GERMANUM #311, 366 (POLYAMBLYODON) GERMANUS, POLYAMBLYODON 527, 528 POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTOMETOPON) CRISTICEPS 527*, 528, 529*, 530*—2 Pl. 50 POLYAMBLYODON (LEPTOMETOPON) GIBBOSUS 528, 531 POLYAMBLYODON (POLYAMBLYO- DON) GERMANUS 527, 528 POLYPTERUS 501 POLYSTEGANUS 367-8, 371, 373-4, 378-380 POLYSTEGANUS ARGYROZONA 308%, 368, 374, 378 POLYSTEGANUS COERULEOPUNCTA- TUS 368, 373, 374-6 Pls. 22, 28 Polysteganus natalensis 376 Polysteganus nufar 37} POLYSTEGANUS PRAEORBITALIS 368, 374, 379, 380* Pls. 21, 28 POLYSTEGANUS UNDULOSUS 368, 374, 376-7* Pls. 21, 28; p. 556 POMADASYS OPERCULARE 179-182 Pomadasys striatus 288-9 POMADASYS STRIDENS 287-9 POMADASYS SUILLUM 181 POMATOMUS SALTATOR 186 PORCOSTOMA 311, 314, 348 PORCOSTOMA DENTATA 311, 349, 350 Pls. 20, 25 PRAEORBITALIS, POLYSTEGANUS 368, 374, 379, 380* Pls. 21, 28 PRIONOLEPIS 1 PRIONOLEPIS HEWITTI I, 3* Prionolepis hewitti 187 PRIONOSPARUS 546, 548 PRISTIOPHORUS 253 Volume | ends at page 300 PRISTIPOMOIDES 287 PRISTIPOMOIDES MICUS 285-6*-7 Pristipomoides filamentosus 287 PRISTIPOMOIDES MICRODON 287 PSAMMOGOBIUS 193 PSAMMOGOBIUS KNYSNAENSIS 193-4 PSENES 53, 200 PSENES INDICUS 53 Psenes pellucidus 53-4 PSENES WHITELEGGII 199, 200 Pi. 19 PSEUDALUTERES 240 PTERAGOGUS OPERCULARIS 289, 290*-—1 PTEROGYMNUS 310-11, 314, 335 PTEROGYMNUS LANIARIUS 311, 335, 336*-7 Pls. 19, 25; p. 526 PTEROPLATEA 43 PTEROPLATEA NATALENSIS 43-5*-7 PI. 4 PULCHELLA, PARAPERCIS 276—7*-9 PUNICEUS, CHRYSOBLEPHUS 311, 340-1, 343-4*-5, 526, 551-2, $54—-5*-6 PUNTAZZO 305, 311, 313, 330 PUNTAZZO PUNTAZZO 311, 330 PUNTAZZO, PUNTAZZO 311, 330 ARGYROGRAM- QUADRICORNIS, LACTOPHRYS 209 PI. 22 | QUADRISPINOSUM, ACANTHIDIUM 270-1 *-2 QUEKETTI, CHELIDONICHTHYS 68* regani, (Cetomimus) 158 REYNALDI, (HEMIRHAMPHUS) 31 RHABDODERMA 425 RHABDOSARGUS 321, 546 RHACHICENTRIDAE 177 RHACHICENTRUM CANADUS 177-8 Rhynchorhamphus 21-2 RIVERS-ANDERSONI, (PERISTEDION) 71 rivulatus, Déntex 533, 537, 541 rivulatus, Gymnocranius 533 ROBINSONI, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 317 robinsoni, Dentex 533, 537 ROBINSONI, GYMNOCRANIUS 368, 369 Pls. 21, 27 robinsoni, Gymnocranius 533, 536-7, 541 ROBINSONI, HOPLEGNATHUS 169-70 PI. 18 robinsoni, Parapercis 279 ROBUSTA, AXELIA 501, 505 ROBUSTUS, CLINUS 196, 297 ROBUSTUS, MUGIL 88-90, 93-4*-S, 115, 130-1 Pls. 21, 22 RUPPELLII, GYMNOCRANIUS 533, 537, 541 ruppellii, Mugil 100 rupestris, Dentex 371 RUPESTRIS, PETRUS 368, 381-2* Pls. 21, 27 Salarias 191 Salarias sexfasciatus 190-1 © saliens, Mugil 81, 100, 102, 106-8, 110 SALMO 236 SALMO FARIO FARIO 236, 237 SALMO FARIO IRIDEUS 236, 237 SALMOIDES, MICROPTERUS 237 SALMONIDAE 218, 236 SALPA, SARPA 311, 360 SALTATOR, POMATOMUS 186 SAMMARA, HOLOCENTRUM 275 PI. 11 SARBA, AUSTROSPARUS 311, 319, 320- 323—4*, 327-8 Pls. 18, 23; p. 545-547-9 sarba, Austrosparus 325 sarba, Chrysophrys 547 SARBA, SPARUS 44, 141, 547 SARDA CHILENSIS 293, 294*—5 SARDA SARDA 295 SARDA, SARDA 295 SARDINELLA MELANURA 150-1 . SARGUS, DIPLODUS 311, 320, 331-2* Pls. 19, 24 SARGUS HOLUBI 327 SARPA 305, 311, 357, 359 SARPA SALPA 311, 360 SASSENIA 425 SCANDENS, ANABAS 230 Scarostoma 170 SCATHARINAE 310-1, 357 SCHEDOPHILUS 54, 56 SCHEDOPHILUS MEDUSOPHAGUS 55-7 Pl. 5 SCHLEGELI, HEMIRHAMPHUS 22, 24, 35-39, 40 schlegeli, Hemirhamphus calabaricus 39 ; SCLATERI, GEPHYROGLANIS 226 Pl. 33 SCOLOPSIS MONOGRAMMA 51 SCOLOPSIS VOSMERI 50 SCOMBEROMORUS LINEOLATUS 188-9 SCOMBRIDAE 185, 187-8, 293 SCORPAENA KOWIENSIS 202-3 SCORPAENIDAE 12, 57, 201-2, 543 SCORPIDIDAE 6, 135-7, 247 SCORPIS 6 SCRIPTUS, ALUTERES 240-1, 243-4 Pl. 42 scriptus, Osbeckia 243 SCULLYI, (BLENNIUS) 189 SCYLLIORHINICEPS, ECKLONIA- ICHTHYS 561-2*-3 SCYMNORHINUS 253 SCYMNORHINUS BREVIPINNIS 253—-4*-5 SCYMNORHINUS LICHA 255 Scymnorhinus lichia 255 SCYMNORHINIDAE 253 SCYMNUS 253 SEHELI, MUGIL 89, 95, 111-2*-3, 123, 131 Pls. 16, 18 Semathunnus 187 SENTICEPS, BARBUS 219, 220*, 266* SERRANIDAE 167, 542 ' SERRANUS KNYSNAENSIS 167 SETARCHES GUNTHERI or GUENTHERI 57-8 Pl. 6 SETIFER, CHAETODON 247 SETIFER, MONACANTHUS 206-7 Pl. 19 sexfasciatus, Salarias 190-1 SINUOSA, WIMANIA 500 SMITHII, (MICROPHIS) 50 smithii, (Mugil) 118 SOLEIDAE 4 SPARIDAE 135-7, 182, 303-308*-10, 337, 525-6, 532-534, 536, 545 SPARIFORMES 534 SPARINAE 3410-312-3 SPARODON 311, 313, 315, 327-8 Volume | ends at page 300 SPARODON DURBANENSIS 311, 321, 328-9*, 330 Pls. 18, 23 SPARRMANI, TILAPIA 229 PI. 32 SPARUS 183, 304-5, 313-321, 328-331, 334-5, 340, 349, 545 Sparus durbanensis 328 Sparus lophus 340 Sparus madagascariensis 315 SPARUS SARBA 44, 141 Sparus sarba 547 SPEIGLERI, MUGIL 128, 129-30 speigleri, Mugil 81, 120, 122 SPINIFER, ARGYROPS 311, 333, 334-5 Pls. 20, 25; p. 525 SPONDYLIOSOMA 305, 311, 357, 362-3 SPONDYLIOSOMA EMARGINATUM 311, 362 Pls. 22, 29 Spondyliosoma microlepis 362 SQUALIDAE 253, 270 STELLATUS, (TETRODON) 208 STENOGOBIUS 263 STRIATUS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297 striatus, Pomadasys 288-9 STRIDENS, POMADASYS 287-9 STROMATEIDAE 49, 53, 199 STRONGYLOCEPHALUS, MUGIL 81, 83, 88, 93, 96-7*-8, 113, 130 Pls. 16, 18 SUILLUM, POMADASYS 181 SUPERCILIOSUS, CLINUS 11, 197, 297 SYNAGRIS 399 SYNANCEIA 543 SYNANCEIA HORRIDA 543-4 SYNANCEIA VERRUCOSA 543-4 SYNANCIIDAE 13, 543 SYNAPTURA BARNARD] 4, 5* Pl. 16 SYNCHIROPUS MONACANTHUS 165 SYNGNATHIDAE 49, 149 TADE, MUGIL 129-30 TAENIOIDES 564 TAENIOIDES JACKSONI 564—5*—6 TAENIOLABRUS 256 TAENIOLABRUS MARLEYI 256*-8 Pls. 1,2 TAENIONOTUS, (AMBLYAPISTUS) 13 Taius 367, 373 TAPEINOSOMA, PETROSCIRTES 51, 191-2 Pl. 21; p. 296 TAURUS, CLINUS 196, 297 teira, (Platax) 249 TELEOSTEI 215-217* TESTUDINEUS, ANABAS 230 TETRODON LAGOCEPHALUS 207-8 Pl]. 22 TETRODONTIDAE 15, 207 TEUTHIDIDAE 187 Tholichthys 284 THYRSITOIDES MARLEYI 291-2 TILAPIA 228-9, 230 TILAPIA NATALENSIS 229 Pl. 32 TILAPIA SPARRMANI 229 Pj. 32 TOBYEI, (MYLIOBATIS) 147 TORVUS, CONGIOPODUS 51 TRACHELOCHISMUS 561 TRACHICHTHYIDAE 160 TREVELYANI, BARBUS 219 Pl. 29 TRICHONOTIDAE 256 TRICUSPIDENS, AUSTROSPARUS 546, 548-9 TRICUSPIDENS, MUGIL 81, 83-4, 88, 93, 108-9*-10, 123, 131, 133 Pls. 17, 18 TRIFASCIATUS, CHAETODON 280-1 TRIFASCIATUS, DIPLODUS 311, 331, 332-3* Pls. 19, 24 trifascigula, Blennius 295 TRIGLA 61, 73-4 TRIGLA (TRIGLA) 73 (TRIGLA), TRIGLA 73 TRIGLA (TRIGLOPORUS) 61, 73-4 TRIGLA (TRIGLOPORUS) AFRICANA 75, 74-6 Pl. 23 TRIGLIDAE 61 TRIGLOPORUS 61, 734 (TRIGLOPORUS) AFRICANA, TRIGLA 73, 74-6 Pl. 23 (TRIGLOPORUS), TRIGLA 61, 734 TRIPTERODON 137, 245-249, 304 TRIPTERODON ORBIS 187-8, 245, 248- 250*-2 Pls. 21-23; pp. 542-3 TROPIDICHTHYS OXYLOPHIUS 15 Pl. 16 troscheli, Mugil 120 turritus, Ostracion 209 UMBRATUS, LABEO, 224, 225 Pl. 31 UNDULOSUS, POLYSTEGANUS 368, 374, 376—7* Pls. 21, 28; p. 556 UNICORNIS, MONOCEROS 51, 187 unifasciatus, (Hemirhamphus) 33, 36, 38, 40 VAGUS, (ACANTHOPAGRUS) 314 VAILLANTII, (PTEROPLATEA) 46 VALENCIENNI, (PTEROPLATEA) 46 variabilis, Dentex 37} VARIOLA LOUTI 542 VENUSTRIS, CLINUS 196, 297 VERRUCOSA, SYNANCEIA 543-4 vespertilio, (Platax) 249 VESPOSUS 1 vicinus, Anabas 231 VONBONDEI, GOBIUS 259-261 * Pls. 3, 5 VOSMERI, SCOLOPSIS 50 PI. 5 VULPES, ALBULA 51 VULNERATUS, BARBUS 219, 223 Pl. 31 WAIGIENSIS, MUGIL 89, 123-4*-5, 131 PI. 20 WEBERI, PERISTEDION 69-71, 73 Pl. 21 WHITEIA 425 WHITELEGGII, PSENES 199, 200 Pl. 19 WIMANIA 425, 447 WIMANIA SINUOSA 500 XANTHOCEPHALUS, 282-3 * XENOLEPIDICHTHYS 1 XENOLEPIDICHTHYS DALGLEISHI 162-3 Pl. 18 CHAETODON ZEBRATUS, GALAXIAS 236 Pl. 34 zeylonicus, Amphiprionichthys 13 ZEYLONICUS, CARACANTHUS 13 zeylonicus, Micropus 13 Agulhas Cape, 13 Algoa Bay, 20 Amanzimtoti, 37 Bashee, 29 Bazaruto Island, 51 Beira, 52 Bredasdorp Coast, 14 Buffalo River, 26 Bushmans River, 22 Camps Bay, 8 The Cape, 9 Cape Agulhas, 13 Cape of Good Hope, 9 Cape Padrone, 21 Cape Point, 9 Cape Town, 7 Chalumna River, 25 Dassen Island, 6 Delagoa Bay, 49 Durban, 39 East London, 26 False Bay, 12 Fish Point, 24 Great Fish Point, 24 Great Kei River, 27 Inhaca, 47 Inhambane, 50 Isipingo, 38 Kalk Bay, 10 Kei Mouth, 27 Kei River, 27 Knysna, 17 Kowie River, 23 Kosi Bay, 45 — OONOahWHh Swakopmund Walfish Bay Port Nolloth Lamberts Bay St. Helena Bay Saldanha Bay Dassen Island Cape Town Camps Bay The Cape Cape of Good Hope Cape Point Kalk Bay Simons Bay False Bay Cape Agulhas Bredasdorp Coast St. Sebastian Bay Mossel Bay Knysna Plettenberg Bay Tsitsikama Algoa Bay Port Elizabeth Cape Padrone Bushmans River Kowie River Port Alfred Great Fish Point Chalumna River Buffalo River East London SOUTHERN AFRICAN Kei Mouth Great Kei River Transkei Bashee Xora River Umtata River Umgazi River Port St. Johns Pondoland Port Shepstone Umkomaas River Amanzimtoti Isipingo Durban Umgeni River Umhlanga Tugela River Zululand Richards Bay St. Lucia Bay Kosi Bay Maputoland 49) Inhaca cceencee L Ponte Mahone M Ponte Maone Delagoa Bay Lourenco Marques Polana Inhambane Bazaruto Island Beira Zambezi River ALOR I, ACO R yy, — iglEteaey.. OOO Gy, Lamberts Bay, 3 Lourenco Marques, 49 Maputoland, 46 Mossel Bay, 16 Plettenberg Bay, 18 Polana, 49 Pondoland, 34 Ponte Mahone, 48 Ponte Maone, 48 Port Alfred, 23 Port Elizabeth, 20 Port Nolloth, 2 Port Shepstone, 35 Port St. Johns, 33 Richards Bay, 43 St. Helena Bay, 4 St. Lucia Bay, 44 St. Sebastian Bay, 15 Saldanha Bay, 5 Simons Bay, 11 Swakopmund, 1 Transkei, 28 Tugela River, 41 Tsitsikama, 19 Umgazi River, 32 Umgeni River, 39 Umhlanga, 40 Umkomaas River, 36 Umtata River, 31 Walfish Bay, 1 Xora River, 30. Zambezi River, 53 Zululand, 42