m^ :M\ LIBRARY OF 1685- IQ56 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS; FOUNDED ON THE NATURAL HABITS AND CORRESPONDING ORGANISATION OF THE DIFFERENT FAMILIES. By J. O. WESTWOOD, F.L.S. HON. MEM. LIT. HIST. SOC. QUEBEC; MEM. SOC. C^S. NAT. MOSCOW; PHVSIOGR. SOC. LUND; SOC. ROY. SCIENC. LILLE ; SOC. HIST. NAT. MAURITIUS ; SOC. CUVIER. PARIS ; PLIN. SOC. EDINBURGH ; LIT. PHIL. NAT. HIST. SOC. BELFAST, RICHMOND, SHEFFIELD ; MEM. SOC. ENTOMOL. DE FRANCE ; SECRETARY ENT. SOC. LONDON, ETC. " Empnici, formic:^ more, congerunt tantum et utuntur: rationales, aranearum more, telas ex se conficiunt : apis vero ratio media est, quae materiam ex floribus horti et agri elicit ; sed taraen earn propria facultate vertit et digerit." — Bacon, Nov. Org. lib. i. aph. 95. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. L LONDON: LONGMAN, ORME, BROWN, GREEN, AND LONGMANS, PATERNOSTER-ROW. 1839. London : Printed by A. Spottiswoode, New-Street- Square. PREFACE. The majority of Entomological Works which have appeared, during the last quarter of a century, and which have not only given so great an impulse to the science, but have also imparted to it a philosophical character, of which it was previously des- titute, may be described as exhibiting either generalised views of the subject; or, of elaborate technical details of the genera and species of insects. Thus, whilst the delightful Ijifrvduction to Entomology of Messrs. Kirby and Spence, followed by Burmeister's Manual, and, at more humble distances, by the Insect Architectuj'e, Trans- formations and Miscellanies, the Grammar of Entomology, by Newman, and my Entomologist's Text-Book, have made us ac- quainted with the general details of insect habits and structure ; the Illustrations and Descriptions of the Genera of British Insects of Curtis, the Illustrations of British Entomology of Stephens, the Essay on the Fossorial Hymenoptera of Shuckard, the Lepi- doptera Britannica of Haworth, &c., have led us to the investi- gation of the minute details of generic and specific distinctions. The nature of these works necessarily rendered them essentially different in the information they conveyed ; indeed, owino- to the greater number of organs possessed by insects over the higher animals, and the consequently great modifications to which they are subjected in the different groups, in order to fit them for performing their various functions, it must be evident that the former class of works, unless extended to a irreat number of volumes, must necessarily exclude the description A y IV PREFACE. of genera and species ; whilst the immense number of insect species in like manner prevented the latter class of works from entering into detailed accounts of habits and structure, or in- quiries into the relations of the different groups. Thus the student was led at once from the general vieivs he had gained of the subject, to the minute technical details of genera and species, there being no work which he could take up to serve as a guide to the developement of the principles of modern classification, in the distribution of the orders and families. For years this deficiency has strikingly manifested itself to me, and it is long since 1 announced my present undertaking, in which I had proposed to myself to show the application of the modern views which have been entertained relative to the na- tural relations of animals in the arrangement of the entire groups of winged insects; illusti'ating the subject by details of the natural habits, transformations, and structure of the different families. Nothing can be more distinct than the views entertained by Linnaeus and his immediate followers, and modern naturalists, as to the principles of classification. With the former, nothing further was requisite than the construction of an arrangement by which the name of a species might be arrived at in the most convenient, and, consequently, often in the most artificial, manner. Totally regardless of the relations, more or less re- mote, existing amongst the different groups, their writings cannot be regarded otherwise, than as catalogues raisonnees. Modern entomologists, on the other hand, with Latreille at their head, have endeavoured to render the science more in accordance with nature by the establishment of ^^ Families Naturelles" for the reception of the species most nearly according in habits and structure, the investigation of which, in all the various states of the insects' existence, has been rendered requisite, in order to trace the limits, or to show the points of connexion existing between the different groups. Convinced that in our endeavours to perfect PREFACE. V this modern class'ificatioii of insects, we should deserve the greatest assistance from an acquaintance with their preparatory states, I have, during sixteen years of attentive observation, con- stantly kept that object in view, carefully noting down with pen and pencil every fact which seemed to bear upon the subject. I have studied nature in the woods and fields, tending and observing insects in all their various transformations, well knowing, that the man who confines his researches to the mere collection and examination of museum specimens, can neither possess so intellectual an enjoyment, nor acquire so perfect a knowledge of the subject, as is to be derived from the exami- nation of living nature; and it is both with pleasure and with pride that I now submit the results of my numerous observa- tions to the reader. Another object, which strongly impressed itself upon my attention, was the necessity for a careful examination and ar- rangement of the facts scattered throughout the voluminous transactions of foreign and native societies, and the various zoological and entomological magazines and other repertoria of science. The time occupied in wading through the hundreds of volumes which this investigation has necessitated, has been im- mense; but the value of the observations otherwise left to slumber unnoticed, will speak for itself. Independent of the materials thus obtained and alluded to in the body of the work, the " Bibliographical Notices" attached to each family, cannot but be of infinite service to the student. It is not, however, to my own materials, and those derived from published works alone, that I have had recourse. I have industriously availed myself of every opportunity of studying the collections, as well in great Britain as in France and Ger- many; and I must take the present opportunity of returning my sincere thanks to all my friends who have assisted me in my undertaking, and whose communications I have punctually noticed in the body of my work ; but more especially to M. vi PREFACE. Victor Audouin, professor of entomology at the Jardin des Plantes, who has kindly permitted me to make unlimited use of his unique collection and voluminous manuscripts relative to the economy of insects in completing my present work. I have commenced the work with general observations on insects, and then proceeded to divide them into orders : I have afterwards taken up each order separately, dividing it into families, and giving an account of the characters, habits, trans- formations, and general distribution of the insects comprised within each family, with an illustration of their characteristic anatomical details and preparatory states. It is thus that I have endeavoured to make my work a fitting ." Sequel " to the Introduction to Entomology of Messrs. Kirby and Spence, who, upon being made acquainted with its nature, kindly sanctioned my thus styling it. That it may be deemed worthy of such a title, and of a place by the side of their volumes, is the highest object of my ambition. At the same time, in order that this work may serve as a precursor to the works of Curtis, Stephens, &:c., 1 have added a synopsis of the British genera, brought down to the present time. The idea of the addition of this synopsis was derived from Latreille's Considerations GenArales, in which the genera are shortly characterised, and the names of the typical species given in an Appendix. The additions of generic synonymes, references to generic figures and indications of the number of British species, will render the synopsis more complete, although it must be evident that it can serve but as a guide to more ex- tended research. The numerous figures with which the work is illustrated are, in almost every instance, original, and drawn by myself. I cannot conclude this preface without alluding to the endless PREFACE. gratification to be derived from the study of this branch of natural history, of which the present work bears such ample testimony. For a long series of years, the collection of materials for its completion has been a ceaseless labour of love. Indeed, had it not been thus, it would have been impossible for me to liave proceeded in an undertaking " of which the profit, if by great chance there should be any, could not be expected to repay, even the cost of books required in it, and from which any fame must necessarily be confined to a very limited circle*," and in which the time absorbed in the preparation of the text, and in microscopically dissecting so many minute objects re- presented in the wood-cuts, has been so great. 1 have, however, persevered, and, if I shall have succeeded in inducing any of my readers to pursue the science with a higher aim than that of collecting specimens, by investigating the habits and the corre- sponding organisation of these animals with a view to the dis- covery of their natural relations and classification, my labours will not have been in vain, * Kirby and Spence, Introd. pref, vol. i. p. 10. CONTENTS THE FIRST VOLUME. Page Page Observations upon Insects in Hydradephagous Adephaga • 93 general . - _ 1 DYTICIDiE - 95 General Structure of Insects - 5 Gyrinid^ 105 Head, &c. 6 Philhydridous Rypophaga - 111 Mouth 8 HETEROCERIDiE 113 Thorax, &c. 10 Parnid;e 115 Abdomen - - . 14 Helophorid^ 120 Internal Systems 15 Hydrophilid.'e 122 Transformations 16 Sph^ridiidje 128 Distribution of Insects into AgATHIDIIDjE 130 Orders - - . 18 Necrophagous Rypophaga - 132 Metamorphotic System 19 SCAPHIDIID^ 134 Alary System 20 SiLPHlDiE 135 Cibarian System 21 N1TIDULID.E 140 Eclectic System - 23 Engid^ 143 Representative System 26 Trogositides 145 COLEOPTERA. Cucujides 148 Bibliographical References 30 Paussid^ 150 Characters of Order 33 Mycetophagid* 152 Arrangement of Order 37 Dermestid.« 155 Pentnmerous Coleoptera 44 Brachelytrous Rypophaga - 161 Geodephagous Adephaga 45 StAPHYLINIDjE 162 CiCINDELIDjE 47 Pselaphides 174 Carabid^ 57 Clavicornes 178 Larvae of Carabidae - 65 Byrrhid.e 178 Arrangement of Cara- HiSTERIDjE 181 bidae 71 LameUicornes 184 Brachinides 75 Lucanid^ 185 Scaritides 81 Petalocera 191 Harpalides 83 GeOTRUPIDjE - 201 Carabides 89 ScARABiEIDiE 203 Bembidiides 91 ApHODIIDjE 207 VOL. I. a I CONTENTS. Page Page TROGID.E - 208 Helopid.e 311 DVNASTID^E - 210 Cossyj^Iiides - 313 RUTELID^ - 213 Diaperid^ 314 ANOPLOGXATHIDiE - 213 Tenebrionidje - 316 Melolonthid^ - 216 BLAPSIDiE 320 Glaphyrid.b - 220 PlMELIID^ 323 Cetoniid^ - 221 Pseudotetramerous Coleoptera 324 Serricornes - 223 Rhyncophora 326 BUPRESTID.E - 226 Bruchid.e 326 EVCXEMID.E - 232 Attelabid.e - 333 Elaterid-E - - 235 CURCULIOXID.E 338 CEBRIONIDiE - 243 SCOLYTID^ 350 CyPHONIDjE - - 246 Longicornes 355 LaMPYRIDjE - 246 PR10MD.E 359 TELEPHORIDiE - 235 Cerambycid^ 362 Melyrid^ - 258 LEPTLRlDiE 369 Clerid.e - 261 Phytophaga 370 Ptinid^ - 268 Criocerid.e 372 LYMEXYLOXID.E - 273 Cassidid^ 376 B0STRICHID.E - 277 Galerucid.e - 381 SCYDM^XID.E - 279 Chrysomelid.e 383 Hcteromerous Coleoptera - 281 Pseudotrimerous Coleoptera 390 Trachelia - 285 Erotylid.e 391 NOTOXID^ - 286 Endomychid.e 393 Pyrochroid^ - 287 CoCCINELLID.E 395 Lagriid.e - 289 EUPLEXOPTERA (For HORIID.E - - 291 FICULID-E) 398 MORDELLID^ - 292 ORTHOPl'ERA 407 Cantharid-E - 295 Blattid.e 414 Salpingid^ - - 304 Mantid^e 424 CEdemerid.e - 304 Phasmid.e 430 Melaxdryid.e - 305 ACHETID.E - 439 Atrachelia - 309 j Gryllid.e 450 Cistelid-e - 309 1 LOCUSTID.E 456 ERRATA AND ADDENDA TO VOL. I. Page 1. line 8. for "and antenna " read "and two antenna:." line 11. after " Aristotle " read " and the class of insects of Lamarck." 3. line 5. for " mites " read " lice." In reference to the observations in sect. 1. relative to the importance of metamorphosis as the leading character of the Ptilota, Mr. MacLeay, in consequence of the observations of Mr. J. V. Thompson, and the confirmation assumed to have been afforded to them by the recent researches of Captain Ducane (^Annals Nat. Hist, No. 9. Nov. 1838.) has suggested the theory, that " the Ptilota may be characterised by their change of form taking place during their last two or three stages of ecdysis ; while the metamorphosis of all other annulosa only occurs dui'ing the first or second moult after leaving the egg." (Illustr. Zool. So. Africa, No. 3. p. 53. ) In opposition to this theory, I will only here reply that the most elaborate examinations hitherto made of the eggs of spiders and Crustacea by Heroldt' and Rathke, together with my own of the egg of one of West Indian Land Crabs, have clearly demonstrated that, at least in the species under examination, not the slightest change worthy of the name of metamorphosis takes place. 11. line 16. for "in insects" read "in those insects." line 18. for "being" read "are." line 20. dele. line 30. for "are as destitute" read " which are as destitute." 16. line 3. for " oxyginating " read "oxygenating." ■ 17. line 10. 29. for " Homomorphous " read " Monomorphous." line 19. for "larvas" read "larva." 21. line 21. dele "and" before Dermaptera. 32. line 44. for " Harris in ditto ? " read "Harris in Nat. Hist. Soc. Hartford, vol. i." 37. line 37. Mr. Haliday states in the Zoological Journal, that Clambus pos- sesses five joints in the tarsi. 42. line 40. for " Philyhdrida " read " Philhydrida. " 83. line 14. Mr. Newman assures me that Eutoma tinctilatus possess a max- illary unguis, which escaped my microscopical examination of it. If this be the case, it cannot enter into the genus Carenum, in which Latreille noticed the want of a maxillary hook. (i?. An. second edition, tom. iv. p. 381.) 89. line 30. for "Chychrus" read " Cychrus." 93. The elaborate volume of descriptions of Dyticidas and Gyrinida; recently published by M. Aube, must be particulai-ly noticed. 118. line 9. for "to be the" read " to be those of the." 123. note*, line 2. for "species" read " spaces." 126. note -f, M. Audouin has published a note upon this subject in the Hist. Nat. Ins. tom. v. p. 268. Xll ERRATA AND ADDENDA. Page 151. Mr. MacLeay states that his brother has observed that an Austra- lian species of Cerapterus resides in ants' nests, and likewise possesses the power of crepitating. 15^2. note*, for " MycelophagidfB " read " Mycetophagidae." 1 7(). note *, Within a month from the time of the publication of this note (namely, on the 30th of August, 1838), I had the pleasure to capture the Claviger foveolatus in an ant's nest in Whychwood Forest, Oxfordshire. 183. note f , read" Faun. Boreal. Americatia." 220. line 30. and 31. dele the statement of this cocoon being that of a Lepi- dopterous insect. The observation of Mr. MacLeay having applied to the supposed gall of Cecidoses figured by Mr. Curtis on the same plate, and which Mr. MacLeay informs me is the cocoon of a Lepidopterous insect, and not a galL 221. The family Cetoniidte has formed the subject of an Essay by Mr. MacLeay in the Illustrations of the Zoology of Southern Africa. 231. line 34. This passage was written (but not published) previous to the pub- lication of the second edition of Stephens's Nomenclature, in which the genera of Buprestidse were introduced. 281, line 23. for "palpi to appear to belong, this" read "palpi, appear to belong to this," V->OA. Fig. 35.1. The antennae ought to have been inserted at the base of the rostrum. 365. line 21. for "naturally" read "materially." J.O.W.Ml LcrLgTna;n,ii C?^a.y. 1S3S. XSwcdntSc. EXPLANATION OF PLATE. Order Coleoptera. Fig. \. Cicindela liybrida Li7in. (Linn. Cab.) Fig. 2. Anomala Donovani Steph. (Brit. Mus.) Order Neuroptera. Fig, 3. Boreus hyemalis Latr. Order Hymenoptera. Fig. 4. Dicladocerus ( W.) Westwoodii Steph. Fig. 5. Platymischus ( W.) dilatatus Steph, Order Strepsiptera. Fig. 6. Stylops Spencii Pck. Order Hemiptera. Fig, 7. Aphelocheirus aestivalis Westw. Order Homoptera. Fig. 8. Dorthesia characias, S , Latr. Order Diptera. Fig. 9. Phthiria fulva, ? , Latr. MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. I. Observations upon Insects in general. Insects, as proposed to be treated of in the following pages, may be defined to be, Annulose Animals breathing by tracheae, having the head distinct, and provided in the adult state with six articulated legs and antennae, subject also to a series of moultings previously to attaining perfection, whereby wings are ordinarily developed. This definition, which comprises the characters of the Ptilota or winged insects, of Aristotle, does not, indeed, accord with that required by the group of insects as extended by many recent authors ; but the group thus defined is regarded Mr. MacLeay {Linn. Trans. vol. xiv. p. 67.) as pre-eminently natural, and as constituting the typical division of Annulose Animals; and, indeed, when we call to mind the general characters of the classes of the Annulosa and other invertebrated animals, it will appear evident, that the extraordinary metamorphoses to which the Ptilota are subject, attended as they are by the ulterior development of organs of flight, which exist in no other group of invertebrates, ought to be regarded as especially entitling these insects to be treated not only as a distinct, but as a most natural, group*, and consequently as giving a superior degree * It will, perhaps, be objected by some persons, that the existence of metamor- phoses, as an exclusive character, is denied by the researches of Mr. Thompson, who has asserted that the Crustacea undergo equally striking transformations. I have, however, and I trust satisfactorily, disproved the statements of this author, in a Me- moir published in the Philosopldcal Transactions for 1835. It may also be said, that the character employed by Mr. Newman to isolate the winged insects (that of their incapability to reproduce their limbs) ought to have been employed. But this character has also been long since refuted by Dr. Heineken in the Zoological Journal, and by Dr. Burmeister in his Handbuch der Entomologie B 2 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. of weight to that system in which they are regarded as distinct, over the numerous other methods which have hitherto been proposed from time to time, of some of the more celebrated of which it will be convenient to give a very short notice. Linnaeus and his disciple Fabricius introduced into the great division of Insects, not only those subject to metamorphoses and the acquisition of organs of flight, but also all other articulated animals possessing articulated legs, which formed in the Linnaean system the order Aptera, but which Fabricius separated into several other classes. In the former of these systems we perceive the great disadvantages attendant upon the employment of a single character in our attempts to arrange zoological objects, since the order Aptera regarded as equivalent in rank with the orders Coleoptera, Lepidop- tera, &c., comprised not only apterous hexapod, and polypod insects, but also Crabs and Spiders, which more recent anatomical investi- gations have proved to be respectively groups of equal rank with all the winged orders united together. The elaborate researches of Cuvier in comparative anatomy fully proved, that the Crabs and other allied animals (genera — Cancer, Oniscus, and Monoculus, Linn.) could not be retained amongst insects, inasmuch as they possessed a totally distinct system of respiration, breathing by means of bronchiae or gills, as well as a complete system of circulation : of these, therefore, lie formed the class Crustacea, which has been regarded as distinct by all subsequent entomologists. Lamarck on similar grounds removed the spiders, and some other species of Apterous insects (genera — Aranea, Scorpio, and Phalangium Linn.), constituting them into the class Arachnida, including therein, however, the Mites (G. Acarus, Linn.), which breathe by means of tracheae ; the Centipedes (G. Scolopendra and lulus Linn.), the spring-tailed insects (G. Lepisma, and Podura Linn.) ; and the Lice (G. Pediculus Linn.*) These four last-mentioned groups have much perplexed systematists, none of whom are agreed as to their location, and by several of whom their situations have been frequently altered. By Dr. Leach f the Mites were raised to the rank of a distinct class, under the name of Acari; the Centipedes were also elevated to the rank of a class under the name of MyriapodaZa^z-eeV/e; whilst the spring- * The two remaining Linna?an genera are, Piilex (the flea), subject to metamor- phosis ; and Termes, which belongs to the order Neuroptera. f In Samouelle's Comp. p. 75. INSECTS IN GENERAL. 3 tailed insects (as an order named Thysanura from Latreille), and the lice (as an order named Anoplura or the Parasita Lati\) were united with insects as a subclass under the name of Ametabolia.* Mr, Curtis has adopted the group of insects as thus extended by Dr. Leach. By Latreille the spring-tailed insects and mites have been constantly regarded as belonging to the class of insects, from their possessing six legs, in common with the metamorphotic insects ; and the mites have been constantly regarded as portion of the class Arachnida, from possessing in common with the spiders eight legs. The Centipedes, however, have been variously regarded by Latreille, either as forming a distinct order of insects, under the name of Myriapoda (as in the 2d edition of the Regne Animal), or as con- stituting of themselves a distinct fourth Annulose class (as in his last work, Cours d Entomologie, 1831.) Messrs. Kirby and Spence have adopted a classification totally dif- ferent from that of all preceding or subsequent systematists, in which three Annulose classes are formed, namely, Crustacea, Arachnida, and Insecta ; but the latter is augmented by the hexapod spring- tailed insects and lice, the octopod mites, and the polypod centipedes, all of which are regarded as forming a single order, Aptera, charac- terised by respiring by tracheae, and having no system of circulation. [Introd. iii. p. 22.) The incongruous character of the groups thus associated together ; the possession of pvdmonary sacs by Thelypho- nus, which is thus placed amongst the mites ; the recent researches of M. Duges on the respiratory organs of Dysdera and Segestria, read before the Academic des Sciences on the 9th February, 1835, (clearly demonstrating that the respiratory system in the Arachnida is not entitled to pre-eminence as a character of the class) ; and, lastly, the admission of Messrs. Kirby and Spence themselves (Inirod. iv. 383.), that their order Aptera is not a natural, but merely a pro- visional one, and that the hexapod insects are to be regarded as more peculiarly entitled to the denomination of Lisects {Introd. iii. 22.), will, I trust, be considered as sufficient to authorise me in not adopt- ing their views. Mr. Stephens, in addition to the ordinary metamorphotic groups, has added the lice (Anoplura) to the class of insects, without, how- ever, offering an argument for this deviation from all previous systems. The general construction of the hexapod antenniferous body of the * Edinb. Encycl. vol. ix. B 2 4 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. lice approaches very closely to that of such of the very few true insects, which undergo an imperfect metamorphosis, without their wings being developed ; as the bed bug, certain apterous Orthoptera, &c. Dr. Hermann Burmeister has, however, introduced both the spring- tailed insects and the lice amongst insects ; placing the suctorial lice (Pediculidse) in the order Hemiptera, and the mandibulated lice (Nir- midse) and the spring-tailed insects in an order with Libellula, Ephe- mera, Termes, and Psocus. (Comp. his Handb. der Ent. vol. i. § 352., and vol. ii. p. 39., and De Insect. Syst. Nat. 1829.) He appears to have been led to adopt this arrangement by giving too slight a weight to the developement of organs of flight ; citing, in support of his views, the occasional apterous conditions of certain true insects, and even the occasional absence of wings in one of the sexes, as in the glow-worm. In these instances, however, I can see but exceptions to a general rule, for which allowances ought to be made, and, conse- quently, as not warranting the introduction of entire groups of Apte- rous animals into the class- It only remains for me to mention the system of Mr. MacLeay ; which, from the philosophical manner in which the subject has been treated, merits particular notice. In this system, the metamorphotic Annulosa are regarded as the true insects ; the classes Crustacea and Arachnida are introduced, with the limits given to them by Latreille ; but the four other groups, which have already occupied so much of our attention, are, together with another group of Annulose animals, formed into a separate class, under the name of Ametabola, " having no metamorphosis in the usual sense of the word, or only that kind of it, the tendency of which is confined to an increase in the number of feet." {Linn.Tr. xiv. p. 66.) All these Ametabola are destitute of wings, but their respiratory system is similar to that of the true insects. It would occupy too much space were I to recapitulate the arguments adduced by Mr. MacLeay, as to the propriety of the establishment of this class ; I must, therefore, refer the student to the fifth and sixth chapters of the second volume of the HorcB EntomologiccB, premising only that I have adopted this classification, because it leaves the true winged metamorphotic insects as distinct from the other groups, and without expressing any opinion upon the Quinarian views of Mr. MacLeay, or upon the introduction of the Vermes amongst the Ame- tabola. STRUCTURE OF INSECTS. 5 Having thus determined the limits of the class of Insects, a slight sketch of their structural characters, and their distribution into orders, will next occupy our attention. II. General Structure of Insects. The word Insect, derived from the Latin (m and seco, sectuni), indicates one of the chief characters of this group of animals ; the body in which is not only composed of a continuous series of seg- ments, articulating with each other, but is also often divided or cut into three very marked portions, to which the names, head icapu£), thorax, and abdomen have been applied. Unlike the higher animals, insects are not internally furnished with a bony skeleton ; but, to supply its want, the external envelope is ordinarily of a corneous-like texture, to which, on its inner surface, the muscles are attached, and which encases the viscera and other internal organs. This external ILnvelope is, therefore, the analogue of the skeleton of the mammalia, the external organs of locomotion being attached to it. In its chemical composition, this envelope is peculiar, consisting of a substance which has been named Chitine, which is found only in the teguments of articulated animals. To this is added a certain quantity of albumen, an animal matter, certain salts, and an oil of variable colour, which last is generally disposed near the external sur- face, and supplies the varying colours so much admired in this tribe of animals. The Number of Segments, whereof the body of insects is composed, appears, at first sight, to be very variable, but this is more apparent than real ; being caused either by the soldering together of certain of these segments, or the rudimental state of others, in consequence of the superior developement of the adjacent segments. It is, however, to be observed that, owing to the non-developement of wings and generative organs in the larva, the body, in this state, is more regu- larly segmented, and the segments more equally sized, than in the imago state. It has been supposed that the typical number of segments is thirteen ; but some late observations upon the larvae of Hymenop- terous insects, and upon the common earwig ( Trans. Ent. Soc. vol. i. p. 157.), have led me to consider that the number is greater. From the elaborate researches of Audouin and MacLeay into the structure of the thorax of hexapod insects, it has been considered that each of B 3 6 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS- the primary segments is typically composed of four other segments; but as it is only in the thorax that this complex structure is to be traced, I shall notice it in describing that part of the body. The Distrihxition of the Segments of the body of insects into three distinct regions (head, thorax, and abdomen), although not observable in the early states of existence of many species (ex. gr. larvae of Lepidoptera), wherein the body is composed of a series of nearly equal-sized continuous rings, is so essentially indicated in the last and highest state of perfection of the animal, that we may, with propriety, adopt the Linnasan division of the body, into head, thorax [truncus'L.^ , and abdomen ; but the limbs (artus), being attached to the segments forming the thorax, are to be regarded as appendages thereto, and not as distinct primary parts of the body, in the same manner as the antennae and trophi are appendages of the head ; and the ovipositor, sting, caudal forceps, &c., appendages of the abdomen. These three primary divisions of the body appear to be adapted for distinct ob- jects of equally great importance in the physiological relations of the animal. The head comprises the organs of sense, and consists of a single segment. The thoi-ax comprises the organs of locomotion, and is composed of the three following segments ; and the abdomen, which contains the generative organs, comprises the i-emaining segments. The Head is a generally corneous, and often somewhat globose, skull; having an opening in its anterior part for the reception of the organs of the mouth (trophi), and a similar opening at its posterior part, where it is attached to the following segment, and through which the oesophagus or other anterior part of the digestive canal passes. On each side of the head is fixed an immoveable eye, of large size and complex structure, between which are occasionally two, or oftener three, minute simple lenses (ocelli). Towards the front of the head, but behind the mouth, are also attached two move- able organs, of endless variety of form, size, and structure, which are termed antennae, and of which the precise uses have not been deter- mined. The front margin of the head is often separated by a suture from the remainder of the skull, and is then termed the Clypeus. The under surface of the head is the Jugulum K. (Gula, Strauss, and Burm.), the swollen anterior margin of which is the "piece pr^basilaire" of Strauss and Burmeister (Manual, pi. iii. f. 12. d, d), being the stipes of MacLeay, and the mentum and insertion of Newman. It is to the front margin of this swollen part that the true mentum is attached. STRUCTURE OF INSECTS. 7 The form of tlic head and of its various organs is exceedingly varied ; the variations of the mouth are of the highest importance, serving for tlie primary divisions into orders. The AtifenncB are generally elongated, and consist of a number of rings attached together, but varying in structure, not only in almost every species, but also in the sexes of the same species ; those of the males being often much more complex than those of the females. These organs, from their existence only in insects and other articu- lated animals, as well as from their diversity of structure, have at- tracted much attention, and have been employed as excellent distinc- tive characters of genera, &^c. They have received the names of filiform (thread-like), setaceous (bristle-like), moniliform (necklace- shaped), cylindrical, prismatic, ensiform (sword-like), fusiform (spindle- shaped), aristate (terminated by a hair), dentate (toothed), serrated (saw-like), pectinated (comb-shaped), flabellated (fan-like), ramose (branched), furcate (fork-like), geniculated (elbowed), perfoliated (with a knob, composed of loosely attached joints), lamellate (with a plate-like knob), plumose (feathered), verticillate (with whorls of hair), <&c., according to their various form and clothing. The Composite Eyes axe exceedingly varied in their size; sometimes, as in the male hive bee, nearly occupying the whole surface of the head: they are composed of a number of minute transparent corneous hexagonal facets, representing the cornea, and being more or less gibbous, according to the carnivorous habits of the species. The number of these facets is equally varied ; thus in the ant there are but fifty, whereas in the eyes of the butterfly, according to Geoffroy, there are not fewer than 34,650. From the elaborate anatomical re- searches of MuUer and others, it is evident that each of these facets operates as a distinct organ of vision ; and from an interesting me- moir lately presented by Mr. Ashton to the Entomological Society, it appears, that in some species (Libellula) the upper facets are of a larger size than the inferior ; whence a distinct kind of vision may be supposed to be possessed by these different sized facets, according with the habits of the insect. A similar observation was made by Hooke in Tabanus. The Simple £7/e* (ocelli) are generally three in number, and arranged in a triangle on the crown of the head ; they are of a simple and semiglobular form. The eyes of larvae, spiders, and some other Annulosa are simple ocelli, arranged in groups. B 4 8 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. The Organs of the Mouth (upon the variations in which Fabricius constructed his system) are, notwithstanding all their variety of form, reducible to one type of structure. They consist of six principal organs, of which four are lateral and disposed in pairs : the two others are opposed in the opposite direction : thus, :':, filling up the space left by the two other pairs above and beneath. The upper single piece is the upper lip (labrum) : the upper lateral pair of organs are the mandibles or upper jaws ; the lower lateral pieces are the max- illae, or lower jaws, and the under single piece is the under lip. The th^-ee lower organs are furnished with articulated appendages (palpi). The first principal variation in the structure of the mouth originates in the mode of action of the various organs. Thus, when the lateral pieces are short, inserted at a distance apart, and have a horizontal motion, the action is that of biting ; when, on the other hand, the lateral pieces are elongated, originating near together, and having a longitudinal motion (by means of strong and elongated muscles at their base), the action is that of sucking ; the ascension of fluids in the latter case being produced by the gradual approximation of the pieces of the mouth (Latr. Cours. dEntomol. p. 206.), which thus form a siphon or haustellum. The insects having the former action are termed Broyeurs by the French, and Mandibulata by the English, and the latter Su^eurs, of; Haustellata ; but as these terms are liable to ob- jection (the insects composing the latter group possessing mandibles, although in an altered form), it would be convenient to employ some other names.- The terms Dacnostomata and Antliostomata express the properties of the two groups, without involving the contradiction suggested by the terms ordinarily in use. I« the Siting Insects, the upper lip is generally a simple and flat- te^jgd plate closing the mouth above ; the mandibles are generally horny, and more or less toothed ('the teeth being, however, portions of the jaw itself), serving for gnawing in pieces the particles of food ; the maxillse are more complicated, being furnished at the side with an articulated appendage like a short antenna, but of which the number of joints is never more than six. The maxilla itself is termi- nated by two lobes, the exterior of which is sometimes articulated, representing an internal palpus as in Carabus, sometimes formed into a helmet-like appendage ( Galea), protecting the inner lobe as in Locusta, and sometimes soldered to the inner lobe. The lower lip is still more complicated : its base is a horny plate (me?itum, or the labium of STRUCTURE OF INSECTS. 9 Fabricius): this is followed by a generally membranous organ (labium or the ligula of Fabricius), near to the external base of which is attached a pair of short articulated palpi ; within this terminal la- bium is to be seen a fleshy organ, often forming its internal coating, but which in the dragon-fly and the grasshopper is a separate piece (linguci), and of which the lateral anterior angles (paraglossce) are oc- casionally prominent. Such is the general character of the mouth of the Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Neuroptera, and Hymenoptera. In the bees, however, the three inferior organs of the mouth are elongated, so as when in action conjointly to form a sucking apparatus ; the mandibles, however, retain their ordinary form. Latreille, notwith- standing, terms this form of mouth Promuscis, a term long previously given by Kirby and Spence to the mouth of the Hemiptera. Amongst the Suctorial Insects, there is a much greater diversity of structure in the mouth. In the Hemiptera and Homoptera, the upper organ is very short and pointed ; the four lateral pieces are elongated and transformed into slender lancet-like organs (the max- illary palpi being obsolete), enclosed within the equally elongated fleshy and articulated lower lip, which is turned upwards at the sides, forming a canal, up which the fluid food of the insect ascends ; the labial palpi are also here obsolete. This variation of the mouth is termed by Kirby and Spence, promuscis ; but by Fi.bricius, Olivier, and Latreille, rostrum. In the Diptera, the five upper organs, to- gether also with the internal tongue, are elongated into lancet-like organs, the maxillary palpi being attached at the base of the maxilla?. These six organs are inclosed in a fleshy thickened piece (which is the lower lip), terminated by two large fleshy lobes which act as suckers. In many species^however, some of these lancet-like organs are obsolete. This kind of mouth is termed by Kirby and Spence, Linnaeus and Fabricius, a proboscis. In the Lepidoptera, the three upper organs are almost obsolete, but the maxillae are greatly elongated into a delicate instrument, vvhich when at rest is spirally folded up and hidden from sight, but when in action, is extended and thrust to the bottoms of flowers. At the base of these maxillae, a pair of minute palpi is often to be found. The lower lip is soldered to the head, but it is furnished with a pair of large palpi clothed with scales, which serves for the defence of the spiral maxillae. By Kirby and Spence, this kind of mouth is termed antlia; by Fabricius, lingua ; and by Latreille, spirignatha (or more properly speirignatha). In the Apha- 10 ♦ MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. niptera, the organs are all exposed, the upper lip, mandibles, and tongue elongated, the maxillae and labium short and furnished with articulated palpi. It is called rostrulum by Kirby and Spence, and rostellum by Latreille, which latter name had been previously em- ployed by Kirby and Spence for the mouth of the Pediculus, but which Latreille has termed Siphunculus. The Thorax, on account of its being the chief seat of the various organs of motion, is extremely complicated and variable in its struc- ture ; and it is only within a few years that its investigation has been philosophically entered upon, or a concise nomenclature of its parts, founded upon such investigations, proposed. It is the truncus of Linnaeus, and comprises the three segments following the head, which have been respectively termed pi'othorax, mesothorax, and meta- thorax, which were originally proposed by Nitzsch. The first of these segments bears the anterior pair of legs, the second supports the middle pair of legs and the anterior pair of the organs of flight, and to the third are attached the posterior pair of legs and the pos- terior pair of wings. A binary division of the thoracic segments has been proposed, founded upon the nature of the oi'gans of motion ; thus the anterior of the three segments is the manitrunk of Kirby, the coUum of Knoch, and the corselet of Strauss ; whilst the two pos- terior wing-bearing segments are united into the "segment alifere" of Chabrier, the alitrunk of Kirby, the pectus of Knoch, and the thorax of Strauss. The composition of each of the thoracic segments (and indeed of every segment according to the views of Audouin) is essentially similar, consisting of four dorsal subsegments, namely, the Praescutum, Scutum, Scutellum, and Postscutellum; and the Paraptera, Sternum, Episterna, and Epimera, which are lateral or ventral pieces. In the Hymenoptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera, the prothorax is almost evanescent or reduced to a simple collar ; but in the Coleo- ptera, the pronotum (its upper surface) is the very large piece suc- ceeding the head, and which has from the days of Linnaeus been ordinarily but incorrectly termed the thorax, and its subsegments are entirely confluent, this segment being destitute of wings; indeed, it is only in the prothorax of some Locusts that the dorsal subsegments of the prothorax can be traced. But in the Mesonotum and Meta- notum (or dorsal parts of the meso- and metathorax) the subseg- ments are much more conspicuous, indeed the scutellum of the mesothorax was noticed by Linnaeus as one of the chief component STRUCTURE OF INSECTS. 11 parts of the trunk or thorax, being the small triangular piece which is seen at the base of the suture of the elytra of beetles. The chief ventral or pectoral piece in each of the three thoracic segments is the Sternum, which varies considerably in its size and form : thus in the Elateridaj the7>?'osternum is elongated into a point extending between the middle legs, whilst in the large Hydrous piceus the Mesosternum and Metasternum are soldered together between the middle legs, the former projecting in a point between the anterior legs, and the latter extending far beyond the base of the hind legs. The modifications of form in the various thoracic segments result from the complicated machinery requisite for the due performance of the two chief kinds of insect locomotion, namely, leg-movements of various kinds, and wing-movements ; but more especially from the great diversity of the wings and the occasional transfer of wing-motion to a single pair of wings, this pair being either the anterior, as in Diptera, or the pos- terior, as in Coleoptera: thus^ whilst in insects which have the four wings of nearly equal size, the two aliferous segments of the thorax being also of nearly equal size, and their subsegments similarly developed (ea'. t/r. Hemerobius) ; those tribes of insects which have one or the other pair of wings more especially developed ; have the segment to which such pair of wings is attached consequently increased in size : thus in Diptera the mesothorax nearly occupies the entire thorax, there being only mesothoracic organs of flight. In the Hymenoptera, the posterior wings exist, but of a small size ; the me- tathorax is therefore much larger than in the Diptera, but much smaller than the mesothorax. In like manner, in those orders which have the posterior pair of wings enlarged, the mesothorax is di- minished, and the metathorax equally enlarged: this is especially the case in the Beetles, but still more strikingly so in the Strepsiptera, are as destitute of fore wings as the Diptera are of hind ones. The Whiffs, or organs of aerial progression, (upon which the Linna?an arrangement is principally founded,) bear no resemblance to those of birds, being, on the contrary, more analogous to the wings of bats, consisting ordinarily of a delicate double membranous plate, traversed by more or less numerous tubes, which Dr. Leach regarded as repre- senting a system of bony air vessels (Pterygostea), but which the recent microscopical observations of Mr. Bowerbank and others have proved to be veins. These organs of flight, with respect to their consistence, are termed elytra, hemelytra, tegmina, membra- 12 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. naceous wings, halteres or pseudo-halteres. In the Coleoptera the upper pair of wings is transformed into a pair of corneous cases (elytra), generally extending to the extremity of the body, and, when unemployed, shutting closely together by a straight suture down the back. Thus united, they become a shield of great strength, defending the posterior pair of wings, which, when at rest, are transversely folded up beneath them, and which, when the insect is on the wing, are its only effective organs of flight. This lower pair of wings is membranous, and traversed by various corneous veins. In the orders Orthoptera and Homoptera the anterior wings (teg- mina), when at rest, form a roof-like shield to the posterior wings, although much less effective than that of the beetles, since they are of a much more coriaceous texture. The posterior wings themselves are membranous, of a large size, and, when at rest, they are longitu- dinally folded. During flight, both pairs assist in locomotion. In theHeteroptera, the anterior wings (Jiemelytra)axe coriaceous through- out their basal half, and membranous throughout their apical portion ; the posterior wings are of moderate size, membranous, folded lon- gitudinally at rest, and defended by the hemelytra, which shut hori- zontally, the membranous portion of the one folding upon the same part in the other. In the Neuroptera the wings are generally of equal size : they are of a membranous texture, and the posterior are seldom defended when at rest by the anterior, and they are consequently not folded up : whilst In the Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera the ante- rior wings are larger than the posterior, which are likewise never folded up. We thus see, that where the posterior wings take a large share in the act of flight, it is necessary that, being of a larger size, they should be folded up and defended by more or less powerful wing-cases while unemployed ; when, on the other hand, the anterior wings take the largest share of action during flight, the poste- rior are so much reduced as to require no defence ; in other words, where we find large and strong wing-cases or shields, the active organs of flight are membranous, large, and folded up. The veins, which I have already noticed, are extremely variable in their number: thus, whilst the wings of the Dragon-fly are covered with cells or meshes formed by the conjunction of these veins, the wings of some Hymeno- ptera are almost destitute of them. The numberand position of these veins and cells are of great use in determining the genera, especially of Hymenopterous and Dipterous insects. The wings of STRUCTURE OF INSECTS. 13 the Lepldoptera are clothed with exceedingly minute feather-scales, which are rubbed off at the slightest touch, and which are somewhat analogous to the scales of fishes. In the Trichoptera and some Diptera the wings are more or less clothed with hairs. In the Diptera there is a pair of slender clubbed organs attached at the sides of the metathorax termed halteres, and which have been considered as representing the hind wings, whilst in the Strepsiptera a somewhat similar pair of twisted organs are placed at the side of the thorax, in front of the wings : these have been termed pseudo-halteres, and are the analogues of the fore-wings. In addition to the foregoing appendages, the pro- thorax is occasionally armed with a pair of moveable spines (umbones K. and S.), and in the Lepidoptera there is a pair of scales {patagia K. and S.) clothed with hair, distinct from the tegulae, with which they are confounded by Burmeister {Manual, p. 77.). The latter organs acquire a large size in the Lepidoptera, and are the pieces clothed with hair, which repose upon the base of the wings. The Diptera are also furnished with a small membranous appendage [alula) attached to the posterior base of the wing, which Kirby and Spence regard as the true analogue of the posterior pair of wings: they are, however, decidedly portions of the fore wings ; there exists a similar pair of winglets at the internal base of the elytra of the Dyticidae, and which I have discovered equally developed in Hydrous piceus. The Legs, or organs of terrestrial or aquatic progression, are six in number, attached in pairs to the three thoracic segments: they are arti- culated with the sternum of each segment, and are composed of a series of articulations, united together in such a manner as to permit the re- quired movements ; thus when the insect is pre-eminently cursorial, the basal articulations are freer than in those species which being nata- torialj the movement is confined to a simple working forwards and backwards of the leg. In other species, which are saltatorial, the hind legs are elongated and thickened, for the purpose of giving support to the strong muscles by which leaping is performed ; in other species, which are raptatorial, the forelegs are formed into a prehensile organ, whilstj in the fossorial species, the same legs are altered, so as to serve for burrowing or scratching in the sand. The chief divisions of the legs are the coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, and tarsus : the coxa is the gener- ally large and flattened piece which articulates with the sternum, of a variable form, and which assumes its maximum degree of development in Dyticus and Haliplus : the trochanter is a small piece connecting the 14 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. preceding with the femur, which, in general, is the thickest part of the legs, and generally extends beyond the sides of the body. In leaping insects it is especially incrassated and often toothed beneath. The next piece is the tibia, which is generally nearly equal in length, but more slender than the femur ; it is an important piece of the leg, and is often armed with various appendages, especially at its tip, where they generally assume the appearance of spurs, or acute points {calcaria). The tarsus is a jointed piece, armed at its extremity with one or two slender curved hooks {ungues), and often accompanied by membran- ous or fleshy cushions {pulvilH). The number of joints in the tarsi varies from two to five. This part of the leg affords important characters for generical and family distinctions. The Abdomen consists of a series of segments, for the most part destitute of any appendages, which last are to be found only in a few species, where they appear either as the external organs of genera- tion, or as filaments, or other analogous pieces attached to the ex- tremity of the body. These segments are attached together by membranes, and either meet at the edges or slide into each other like the tubes of a telescope ; each of them is formed of two arcs, or semi-segments, one of which is dorsal, and the other ventral. The typical number of segments is rarely to be found in the perfect state, some of them being ordinarily employed in the construction of the organs of generation ; in the male Earwig, however, nine distinct ab- dominal segments, exclusive of the anal forceps, are to be observed. The abdomen is attached to the posterior thoracic segment, either by its whole breadth, when it is said to be sessile, or by a slender portion of its base, which is called a peduncle : this latter mode of articulation is especially to be observed in the majority of the Hymeno- ptera, and some other orders. The chief appendages of the abdomen are the ovipositor, which is extremely varied in the different tribes, (being sometimes replaced by a powerful sting,) and the elongated setae, forceps, or other analogous organs. With respect to the Internal Anatomy of Insects, a few brief notes must here suffice. They arrange themselves under the head of the sensitive, digestive, circulatory, respiratory, muscular, and generative systems. The Senses of insects are dependent upon the action of the nerves, the system whereof in insects consists of a pair of medullary threads, exhibiting a series of knots or ganglia, whereby they are united STRUCTUUE OF INSECTS. 15 together at certain distances, but which ganglia are often confluent, especially in the imago state : from these knots or ganglia, an infinity of nerves ramify to the various organs, endowing them with the various senses of which insects are possessed. These are, vision, the external organs of which, the eyes, have been already shortly de- scribed ; hearing, which insects clearly appear to possess, but upon the precise organ of which naturalists are not agreed ; smell, of which the external organ is also unascertained ; taste, the seat of which resides in the parts of the mouth ; and feeling or touch, whereof it has been generally supposed that the antennae were the chief organs, but of which the tarsi and the palpi have been respectively regarded as the instruments by various eminent physiologists. The Digestive Organs consist of an elongated canal, composed of several distinct portions, which have been termed the pharynx, im- mediately connected with the mouth ; the oesophagus, the craw, the gizzard, the stomach, and the intestines, terminating at the anal orifice : there are moreover a number of delicate elongated tubes, or biliary and salivary vessels opening into the digestive canal, the secretions whereof assist in the conversion of the food. The length of the canal varies greatly, being short in the carnivorous species, and often several times longer than the body in the herbivorous ones, whereof an ex- cellent example will be found noticed in the family Coccinellidae. The Circulatory System has only recently been proved to exist. It had been long noticed that a series of large reservoirs, easily to be perceived beneath the transparent dorsal skin of many caterpillars, termed the dorsal vessel, and supposed to be analogous to the heart, underwent alternate contraction and dilatation, but it was supposed that no aperture existed from these resei'voirs, and consequently that there was no circulation. This, however, at length appears to have been de- cidedly proved, by the researches of Carus, Strauss-Durkheim, Bur- meister, and especially by the powerful microscope of Mr. Bowerbank, whose two papers in the Entomological Magazine sufficiently prove the existence of a circulation of a cold transparent and nearly colour- less fluid, not only in the larvae of ephemerae, &c., but also in the veins of the wings of the perfect Hemerobius. The Respiration of insects is effected by means of two great canals (tracheae) running along the sides of the body, beneath the outer sur- face, and communicating with the atmosphere by means of numerous short tubes terminating at or near the sides of the body in breathing 16 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. pores (spiracles or stigmata), varying in their number; internally the tracheae emit an infinite number of ramifications, extending to all parts of the body like the branches of a tree, and thus oxygmating the cir- culatory fluid which is diffused from the series of hearts throughout the various organs. The Muscles of insects are not unlike those of the higher animals, being however attached to the inner surface of the external covering of the animal, but being far more numerous than in the human body, Lyonnet having discovered more than four thousand in the caterpillar of the goat moth, whereas there are in man only 529 ; they are at- tached to the various organs intended to be brought into motion by their assistance, being either flexors or extensors, levators or depressors. Of the System of Generation it will be sufficient to observe, that in insects the sexes are constantly distinct, each sex being provided with its own peculiar generative organs ; those of the female consisting of numerous ovaries and egg passages, and an ovipositor of varied con- struction, and frequently external ; and that the impregnation of these eggs is produced by the union of the sexes. It is also to be observed, that amongst certain tribes of insects which are social in their habits, and where a certain number of individuals are required to perform the duties of the community distinct from those of reproduction, this effect is produced by the peculiar nature of the food given to these individuals whilst in the larva state, which has the extraordinary effect of retarding the development of their generative organs ; moreover, there are other tribes (Aphides) in which a single impreg- nation suffices for several subsequent generations. Shortly after impregnation, the female commences the laying of her eggs, an operation not performed without the utmost solicitude on the part of the parent for the welfare of her future offspring. The various means adopted for the purpose of placing the eggs in such situations as will ensure a due supply of food to the young when hatched, are amongst the most extraordinary instances of instinct with which we are acquainted. When the young insect first makes its escape from the eg^, it appears in a form generally totally unlike that of its parent, although in a few instances its form is that which it will retain through life. It is now termed a caterpillar, grub, or maggot (larva), and has a series of moultings to undergo, during the last two or three of which its form is more or less altered. In the earlier stages STRUCTURE OF INSECTS. 17 of its growth it is termed a larva, but the state immediately pre- ceding that in which it assumes its final or imago form is termed the pupa. The variations in the form of these several states in the different orders have been employed in the construction of the meta- morphotic distribution of insects, to be subsequently noticed, which will render it unnecessary to enlarge upon them at any great length in this place. Insects, in respect to the relation of the larva with the imago, may be divided into two principal divisions which I have termed Heteromorpha, or those in which there is no resemblance between the parent and its offspring; and Homomorpha, or those in which the larva resembles the imago, except in the absence of wings. In the former the larva is generally worm-like and articulated in its form, of a soft and fleshy consistence, and furnished with a mouth, and often with six short legs attached in pairs to the three segments succeeding the head. In the latter, including the Orthoptera, He- miptera, Homoptera, and certain Neuroptera, the body, legs, and antennae are nearly similar in their form to those of the perfect insect, but the wings are wanting. The Period of the Larva State is that in which the operations of feeding are especially carried on, and during which, owing to the rapid growth of the insect, whereby the outer envelope from time to time becomes too small for the creature, it is necessary that a succession of moultings should take place. When, however, the insect has at- tained its full size as a larva it ceases feeding, prepares for itself a retreat formed of various materials, but often composed of silk drawn from the spinnerets of the lower lip, and which is termed a cocoon. Within this retreat the insect again throws off its skin and appears as a pupa or chrysalis, in which the rudiments of the limbs of the imago are more or less distinctly seen. In the Homomorphous division, however, the pupa continues active, differing only from the larva in its increased size, and in having attained short rudimental wing- cases upon the back of the mesothoracic and metathoracic segments. The Pupa is far more variable in its form in the different primary groups than the larvae; and hence Fabricius* employed the cha- racteristic name of the variation of the pupa to designate the general nature of the metamorphosis, whereby the metamorphosis of an insect is incorrectly said to be incomplete in Scarabaeus and Apis, where the larva is quite unlike its parent, and the pupa pedate, but quiescent; * Philosophia Entoniologica, p, SQ. § G. C 18 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. whereas this kind of metamorphosis is the most complete of any of the changes which insects undergo. This impropriety has resulted from the improper application of the Linnaean terms employed for the designation of the pupa : (Pupa completa, Spiders, &c. ; semicompleta, Grasshoppers, &c. ; incompleta, Bees, Ants, &c.; obtecta, Butterflies and Moths ; and coarctata, two-winged Flies.) When the insect has remained a certain period in the pupa state it again sheds its skin and appears in its perfect and final state ; at first, indeed, its external envelope is humid and soft, but it soon dries and hardens by exposure to the air, acquiring at the same time its various colours. These modifications in the outer forms of insects are also accompanied by equally important changes in their internal structure as well as by the modifications in the economy of the insect consequent thereon. III. Distribution of Insects into Orders. This branch of Entomological Science has attracted much of the notice of naturalists in all ages ; but it was not until the era of Swammerdam and of Ray, that philosophical principles were introduced and made the basis of the distribution of insects into primary groups. As, however, most of the systems of Entomology have been noticed at considerable length in the fourth volume of the Introduction to Entomology, I must refer the reader thereto, deeming it, however, essential to offer a few observations thereon. Previous to the age of Swammerdam, the most vague ideas were entertained with respect to insects, of which the fanciful hypothesis of spontaneous generation was one of the most absurd. Hence, it is not to be wondered at, that Swammerdam (who together with Redi and Ray completely overthrew this system by establishing the theory of the universal developement of animals, ex ovo) was led to consider the principle of metamorphosis which he had so successfully employed against the spontaneous generationists, as of primary importance for the classification of insects. Indeed it is evident that the very nature of his studies, by which he had obtained so great a victory, could have had no other effect than to have produced the Metamorphotic System of Insects, detailed in his surprising and still invaluable Biblia Naturae^ and in which four primary divisions are established. 1. Insects subject to a change of skin, but undergoing no change of form. (Spiders, Lice, Woodlice, and Centipedes.) DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS INTO ORDERS. 19 2. Hexapod insects subject to metamorphosis, having an active pupa, in which the rudimental wings and wing-covers are exposed. (Bugs, Grasshoppers, Dragonflies, Mayflies.) 3. Hexapod insects undergoing metamorphosis, in which the pupa state is quiescent, either having the hmbs enclosed in distinct cases (Beetles, Bees, Wasps, &c., and part of the orders Neuroptera and Diptera), or covered in an entire case (Butterflies, Moths). 4. Hexapod insects undergoing metamorphosis, the pupa state having neither motion nor wings, but enclosed in an ovate case (most two-winged flies and some other insects, whose transformations were not clearly understood by Swammerdam). Various other classifications of insects, from the nature of their metamorphosis, have been from time to time proposed by different authors, amongst which it will be sufficient to notice the two follow- ing : first, that of Lamarck, in which insects are divided from the structure of the pupa as follows : — 1. Those having an inactive pupa (C^r^5a?25), enclosed and entirely concealed in an opake covering. (1. a.) Chrysalis signata. Lepidoptera and some Diptera. (1. b.) Chrysalis dolioloides. Diptera (coarctata.) 2. Those having an inactive pupa (^Muniia), covered by a thin skin, through which the limbs of the insect are discernible. r Coleoptera. (2. a.) Mumia coarctata - - 1 tt ^ ■' L Hymenoptera. (2. b.) Mumia pseudonympha - Neuroptera in part. r Orthoptera. 3. Those having an active pupa (Nympha) -| Hemiptera. L Neuroptera in part. The other proposed metamorphotic system is that given by Mr. Newman in an ingenious treatise published in the 9th Number of the Entomological Magazine, in which winged insects are divided as follows : — Amorpha, in which the penultimate state is provided neither with mouth nor organs of locomotion ; consequently it neither eats nor moves ; neither does it bear any resemblance to the perfect state. Lepidoptera, Diptera. Necromorpha, in which the penultimate state is provided with mouth and organs of locomotion detached from the body ; but so c 2 20 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. enveloped in a case that it can employ neither. The resemblance to the perfect state is very considerable, excepting in total want of motion. Hymenoptera, Coleoptera. IsomorjjJia, in which all the stages are active and voracious, and of similar form. Orthoptera, Hemiptera. Anisomorpha, in which appear the Amorphous, Necromorphous, and Isomorphous characters, together with a typical and distinct character. Neuroptei'a.* It will be at once perceived, that these two systems are virtually almost identical. Mr. Newman's divisions of the Amorphous Ader- mata and Dermata are also identical with Lamarck's groups, Chrysalis signata and Chrysalis dolioloides, and the varied character of the Neuroptera is indicated by MacLeay. (^Horae Ent. Siwd Linn. Trans, xiv. p. 68.) Besides the five variations of metamorphosis constituting the diagnostics of Lamarck's five groups or sub-groups mentioned above, there are others of minor importance, which ought not to be omitted in a system established exclusively on Metamorphosis; thus some of the aquatic pupae of the Adermatous Diptera~are locomotive, whilst some of the Dermatous Diptera are nourished within the bodies of the parent, the Hippoboscidae not being excluded from them until their arrival at the pupa state. Again, the Phryganeidae, Libellulidae, Ephemeridae, Chalcididag, Raphidiidse, Coccidae , and Aleyrodes, respectively offer various striking modifications in the nature of their metamorphoses ; whilst in the pupa of Quedius tristis. Water- house, and some othei Staphylinideous larvae, the limbs are soldered as completely to the body as they are in the pupae of the Lepidoptera. Hence I consider that the nature of the metamorphoses, if alone relied upon, will not afford a sufficient mode of classification. We will, therefore, next proceed to notice the Alary System, or that * In the Essay published by the same author, under the name of " Sphinx vespi- formis/' this order is formed into a central circle, around which are arranged the six preceding orders, forming as many circles. The distribution of the English groups have been arranged by the same author in his Grammar of Entomology, and in a memoir inserted in the second volume of the Entomological Magazine, upon the same system; of which Dr. Burmeister has remarked — " Die Eigenthumlichkeit dieses neuen Systemes is vollkommen bezeichnet, wenn wir ein allbekanntes Urtheil darauf anwenden, indem ' das Gute desselben nicht neu und das neue nicht gut ' genannt werden kann." Weigm.' Arch. V. 1. No. 4. f Trans. Ent. Soc. No. I. pi. iii. f. 2. i. DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS INTO ORDERS. 21 founded upon the structure of the organs of flight, of which Linnaeus was the founder, and by whom insects were thus classed in accordance with the gradual diminution in the number and consistency of their wings. T,. ^ • f horny, with a Straight suture - - 1. Coleoptera. The anterior -{ .•'' . » , ^ ,, tt • . |_ semicrustaceous, incumbent - - 2. Hcmiptera. . f covered with scales - - - 3. Lcpidoptera. I All < , , J f unarmed - - 4. Neuroptera. I I membranous, abdomen -{ .^, • ^ tt J_ L L "''^'' ^ sting - o. Hymenoptcra. 2 With a pair of halteres in the place of the posterior pair 6. Diptera. .0 i.e. Destitute of wings and elytra - - - 7. Aptera. Wings. J The celebrated Swedish naturalist, De Geer, proposed another distribution of insects in 1778, the primary and secondary divisions of which were formed for the most part upon the structure of the wings, which were also employed to characterise the orders. The structure of the mouth was, however, regarded as a secondary character of the latter ; the consequence of which was the neces- sary and advantageous separation of the Caddice-flies and Ephemerae from the other Neuroptera, under the name of Elinguia*; and the division of the Linnaean Hemiptera into three orders — Siphonata * (Cicada, &c.) Dermaptera*, having a suctorial mouth (Cimex and Nepa), and Hemiptera* having a mandibulated mouth, (Mantis, Gryllus, Blatta, and Forficula.) The genera Coccus and Pulex were also respectively raised to the rank of distinct orders. The genera Termes and Psocus, together with the spring-tailed insects and lice, formed another order of the remainder of the Linnaean Aptera, which were divided into two others, thus forming fourteen distinct orders. This was a great step made in the distribution of insects ; and the partial success with which the employment of the variation of the mouth was attended, probably induced Fabricius to construct his Cibarian system, founded upon the characters of the Trophi alone. This was as follows : — * Mandibulated Insects. A. Tivo pairs of jaws. a. The loioer pair Palpigerous. \. Eleutherata (Coleoptera L., Beetles.) Maxillae naked, free. *, These names were proposed by Retzius, the commentator of De Geer ( Gen. et Spec. Ins. Lips. 1783.) That of Dermaptera has, by some accident, been misapplied by English entomologists for the Earwig, instead of the Cimicidae, for which it was proposed. c 3 22 MODERN CLASSIFICATION Of INSECTS. 2. ?7/owafo(OrthopteraO/.&c. Grasshoppers, &c.). Maxillae covered with a blade. 3. Synistata (Neuroptera partly L. and Thysanura Latr.). Maxillse geniculated, and connected with the lower lip. 4. Piezata (Hymenoptera L., Bees, &c.) Maxillae corneous, com- pressedj and often elongated. 5. Odontata (Gen. Libellula Z,., Dragon-flies). Maxillae corneous, toothed. b. The lower pair of jmvs, not palpigeroxis. 6. Mitosata (Myriapoda, Centipedes). B. One pair of horny jaws, armed with a claw. 7. Unogata (Arachnida, Spiders, Scorpions). C. More than two pairs of jaws. 8. Polygonata (Isopod Crustacea, &c.). Jaws within the lower lip. 9. Kleistognatha (Brachyura, Crabs, &c.). Jaws outside of the lower lip.' 10. Exochnata (Macrura, Lobsters, &c.). Jaws external, covered by palpi. ** Suctorial Insects. 11. Glossata (Lepidoptera, L., Butterflies and Moths). A spiral tongue between palpi. 12. Rhyngota (Hemiptera Latr., Bugs, &c.) A rostrum enclosed in a jointed sheath. 13. Antliata (Diptera L., two-winged flies, &c.). Mouth with a soft exarticulate haustellum. The harsh nomenclature of this system, joined with its many errors and the incongruous manner in which insects, the most widely apart, were brought into the same groups, producing altogether a most artificial and unnatural classification, gained for it but few followers. The primary division, however, into mandibulated and suctorial insects, together witli the adoption of some of De Geer's more natural groups, were further steps gained in the approach towards a natural distribution. Entomologists had, however, by this time learned from the advan- tages and disadvantages connected with the Metamorphotic, Alary and Cibarian systems, but more especially from the more decisive DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS INTO ORDERS. 23 views opened to them by the researches of comparative anatomists, that it was necessary to have recourse to the entire characters afforded by the insect in all its stages, and with reference also to its internal as well as external organization. Here, however, we are met, as might indeed be naturally expected, by difficulties of a far greater weight than were caused by the employment of a single character in its various modifications ; since a very slight acquaintance with any extensive group of insects will be sufficient to prove, that many characters which we find in one group, exhibiting a constancy of character, vary in the greatest degree in another, showing that although with the former they might, and indeed ought to be re- garded of the highest importance, in the latter they acquire but a secondary consideration ; thus, whilst some groups which agree in their wings, disagree in the structure of the mouth ; others agree- ing in metamorphosis, vary in their organs of flight. The first attempts made towards the establishment of this, which has been called, the Eclectic Si/stem, were of course partial ; thus Olivier, in 1789, proposed a system in which insects were divided into eight orders, distributed primarily from the wings, from which, as well as, secondly from the mouth, the characters of the orders were derived. Clairville on the contrary, in 1798, divided the winged insects into two groups, Mandibulata and Haustellata, from the structure of the mouth, whether furnished with jaws or a proboscis, characterising the orders from the wings. But it is to Latreille that we are indebted for the great advances made towards the perfection of this system. For nearly forty years was this author unceasingly occupied in im- proving the classification of insects ; and it was by him that the introduction of family groups was effected, from which so great ad- vantages were derived, by greatly limiting the number of the secondary groups ; which from the cutting up of the more unwieldy Linnsean genera had become very numerous. It is true that his numerous suc- cessive publications exhibit variations in the classification of some of the orders ; but this was the natural result of his labours, which were closed by the publication of his introductory work, the Cours dEnto- mologie, in which the Hexapod Annulosa formed his fourth Class Insecta, distributed as follows : — C 4; 24) MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. A. Without icings, eyes generally simple. a. Without metamorphoses. Ord. 1. Thysanoura (Spring-tailed Insects). Mouth with jaws, tail forked. Ord. 2. Parasita (Lice). Mouth with a rostrum, tail simple. b. Metamorphoses. (Pupa incomplete.) Ord. 3. SiPHONAPTERA (Flcas). B. With icings, eyes facetted, and occasionally also icith ocelli. a. {Elytroptera.) Wings two, covered by two horny or coriaceous wing covers, * Mouth with four jaws. Ord. 4. CoLEOPTERA (Beetles). Wing-covers horny. (Pupa incom- plete.) Ord. 5. Dermaptera (Earwigs). Wing-covers horny. (Pupa semi- complete.) Ord. 6. Orthoptera (Locusts, &c.). Wing-covers horny. (Pupa semicomplete.) ** Mouth, an articulated proboscis, enclosing setce. Ord. 7. Hemiptera (Bugs and Cicada?, &c.). (Pupa semicomplete.) b. Gymnoptera. Wings four, or two naked. * Wings four. \ With four jaws. Ord. 8. Neuroptera (Dragonflies, &c.). Wings reticulated. (Me- tamorphoses various.) Ord. 9. Hymenoptera (Bees, &c.). Wings veined. (Pupa incom- plete.) -|--|- With a spiral tongue between two palpi. Ord. 10. Lepidoptera (Butterflies). Wings powdery. (Pupa ob- tecta.) ** Wings tico. Ord. IL Rhipiptera (Bee-parasites, &c.). Balancers, two in front of wings. Ord. 12. Diptera (Flies). Balancers, two behind the wings. There are, however, various objections to this system, which it will be seen has for its primary character the variation of the wings ; thus, for instance, whilst the semicomplete-metamorphosed Orthop- tera and Hemiptera were brought into contact, the mandibulated Neu- roptera were separated from the Orthoptera, to which they are so DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS INTO OKDERS. 25 nearly allied. Mr. MacLeay has offered some other objections against Latreille's system, which he describes as one " expressing more importance to the aerial organs, and the texture of the body, than to the modifications of those organs upon which the very existence of the animal depends. * Ainsi,' says Lamarck, ' les carac- teres si importans de la bouche ne furent nullement consideres, et cederent leur preeminence aux organes si variables dela locomotion dans I'air.' " — Horce Ent. p. 360. I can, however, by no means agree with Mr. MacLeay, in the inferior rank given to those organs, which, as before said, are the very organs which, by their extraordinary deve- lopement, prove the winged insects to be the centre or types of the annulose animals. Moreover, the variableness attributed by Lamarck to the locomotive organs is not less striking in the oral organs of some gi-oups, as in the Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Neuroptera ; thus evincing the correctness of the remark already made upon the insufficiency of a single character, when attempted to be relied upon as an infallible key to the classification of this class of animals. This is not denied even by those authors who are disposed to admit the or- ganisation of the mouth, as of the highest importance in the classifica- tion of insects ; thus Savigny approves of the Lamarckian divisions into " broyeurs " and " su9eurs;" but adds, " je ne pense pas qu'on puisse tirer le caractere de ces divisions de la presence ou de I'absence des mandibules," because he considers the mouths of all insects to be " essentiellement composee des memes elemens." {Memoires, ch. L). Latreille also has suggested the division of insects into two other groups, Gymnostomes, or those which have the parts of the mouth naked, and Thecostomes, or those in which some of them are bristle- like, enclosed in a sheath. The Lepidoptera, as well as the Hymenop- tera, enter into the first of these divisions. [Fam. Nat. 334. 417.) In like manner, Dumeril [Cons. Gen. p. 9.) has remarked, that the lower lip and jaws of some of the Hymenoptera form an apparatus, having " le double faculte de hroyer les alimens, et de ]es pomper par une sorte du succion ;" and Messrs. Kirby and Spence (Intr. Ill, 417.) remark, that " If the mode in which insects take their food be strictly con- sidered, it will be found that in this view they ought rather to be regarded as forming three tribes ; for the great majority of the Hyme- nopterous order, and perhaps some others, though furnished with mandibles and maxillae, never use them for mastication, but really lap their food with their tongue : these, therefore, might be denominatetl 26 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. * lappers.' " And at a subsequent page (vol. iv. p. 366.), they i-egard Clairville's Mandibulata and Haustellata as secondary groups*, " be- ing convinced from the numerous characters they possess in common, notwithstanding the different mode in which they take their food, that they form one connected primary group ; in which opinion they are further confirmed by the variations that take place in their mode of feeding in their different states ; some from masticators becoming suctorious (Lepidoptera), and others from being suctorious becoming masticators, (Myrmeleon, Dytiscus) ; which shows that this character does not enter the essential idea of the animal." Much of the difficulty which has arisen upon this branch of our sub- ject has been produced by regarding the relations of insects as exhibit- ing themselves only in a linear series. It is not necessary for me here to advocate either the quinary or the circular disposition of groups ; but when I perceive that, by quitting the linear series we gain a decidedly greater number of points of contact, whereby groups, which in such linear series must be kept w idely apart, are brought into juxta-posi- tion, I cannot but think, that some other than an undeviating chain of linear affinity is the correct mode of viewing the productions of nature. Now, Mr. MacLeay, by his system (which may be termed the Representative System), has obviated more of the difficulties already pointed out, than could by possibility be effected by any of the previous systems. Here, indeed, as he observes, in the Horce Ento- mologiccB, "■ a beautiful regularity is perceivable, comprising those dis- tinctions of Trophi, insisted upon by Fabricius, Cuvier, and Lamarck ; those relations of metamorphosis, constituting the leading principle of De Geer, Olivier, and Latreille ; and, finally, those characters from the organs of locomotion, upon which orders were founded by Aris- totle, Ray, and Linnaeus." By reminding the student, that in the following tables the first and fifth order in each series are supposed to be as nearly related to each other as any other two contiguous orders (each series returning into itself and forming a circle), an idea may be gained of Mr. MacLeay's mode of distribution. The names printed in italics are * Mr. MacLeay, in order to establish a quinary distribution of the Annulosa, con- sidered the Mandibulata and Haustellata as classes, each possessing an equal rank with the Crustacea, Arachnida, and Ametabola. I cannot adopt this view ; which, indeed, Mr. MacLeay has himself partially modified in his Memoir in the 14th volume of the Linneean Transactions, DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS INTO ORDERS. 27 either those of the osculant groups connecting the orders, or of those insects which point out the connection of the orders. Distribution of metamorpJiotic toinged Insects from the " HorcB Entomo- logicce," ii. p. 367., and " Linncean Transactions," xiv. p. 67. MANDIBULATA. Relations of Analogy. Trichoptera "i K. f Metamorphosis obtected. (Phryganea, Perla, -5 Larva with membranous Tenthredo. ) (^ legs. Ord- Bomboptera M. L. ( G. Sirex. ) 2. HyMENOPTERA Linn, G. Mijrmecodes. Ants. O. Strepsiptera K. G. Atractocerus. 3. COLEOPTERA Afist, Larvae various. {Metam. incomplete or ' coarctate. Larva apod, or vermiform. 1 HAUSTELLATA. I. Lepidoptera Linn. G. Pterophorus. G. Psychoda. Diptera Arist. Metam. incomplete. O. Dermaptera Leach. (^Earwig. ) 4. Orthoptera Oliv. G. Mantispa. O. Raphioptera M. L, ( G. Boreus. ) 5. Neuroptera Linn. Fam. Hippoboscidir. G. Nycteribia, leading to Arachnidous class. 3. Aptera (the Flea). (Larva apod, but of Co- leopterous structure). r Metam. semicomplete. ~|^ 4. |_ Larva resembling Imago. J O, Megaloptera ( G. Sialis). Perlides, lead- ing to Trichoptera. {Metam. various, includ- ' ing subsemicomplete. Larvae he.xapod. Hemiptera Linn. ( G. Cimex. ) Fam. Hydrocorisa. HOMOPTERA. ( G. Cicada, &c. ) Flata limbata Fab. & G. Aleyrodes, leading to Lepidoptera. The point of connection of the two circles, formed by the returning of these two series into themselves, is supposed to exist between the Trichoptera, and Lepidoptera, being effected by such species of the latter as have very long antennae, like the Adelae, and such as have the trophi obsolete, as Aglossa. That objections existed against this mode of classification on various points of view, Mr. MacLeay was well convinced, and of which indeed he has enumerated several in the sixth Chapter of the Horce EntomologiecE, besides which it may be urged that the minor details, and especially the construction of the majority of the osculant groups and orders are quite untenable Still, however, as a whole, it must be admitted that the various Metamorphotic, Alary and Cibarian cha- racters have never before been brought to bear together with such w^eight as in the system now before us ; which, far from regarding as all-perfect, I would rather consider as the first stepping-stone towards a natural system not founded upon a linear series of affinities, but 28 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. which it will require far greater investigations and much more elaborate research to bring to perfection than it has hitherto received. Modifications of the system of Mr. MacLeay have been published by Messrs. Kirby and Spence, and Mr. Stephens. The former authors {Introd. iv. p. 368.), distribute the Metamorphotic Insects in the following manner. * Orders in which the ordinary Trophi all occur, or the mouth is perfect. 1. Coleoptera. 2. Strepsiptera. 3. Dermaptera. 4. Orthoptera. 5. Neuroptera. ~ 6. Hymenoptera. ** Orders in which all the ordinary Trophi do not occur, or the mouth is imperfect. 7. Hemiptera (divided into Heteroptera and Homoptera as sub- orders). 8. Trichoptera. 9. Lepidoptera. 10. Diptera. 11. Apha- niptera (the Flea). Here we find the Strepsiptera interfering to prevent the passage between the Coleoptera and Orthoptera effected by the earwigs, the Neuroptera and Trichoptera far asunder, and other equally great objections. Mr. Stephens {Illustrations Brit. Ent. Mand. i. p. 2., Haust. i. p. 2.), adopts the divisions, Mandibulata and Haustellata, placing in the former the orders, 2. Strepsiptera, 3. Coleoptera, 4. Dermaptera, 5. Orthoptera, 6. Neuroptera, 7. Trichoptera, 1. Hymenoptera; and in the latter the orders, 13. Hemiptera, 14. Homoptera, 8. Lepi- doptera, 9. Diptera, 10. Homaloptera, 11. Aphaniptera, and 12. Ap- tera (or the lice which I have excluded, as above mentioned). Like Mr. MacLeay, Mr. Stephens regards these two groups as forming circles, the extremities of each being allied together. Against these and other classifications *, which it would be too tedious to detail, and in which the number of the Linnsean orders is much in- creased, objections exist on the part of some authors who consider it more natural to place the Strepsiptera, Eai'wigs, Forest-flies, Fleas, Thrips, &c., in some of the old orders. Such groups, it is true, are of far more limited extent, and also of less decisive characters than the great groups; but it appears to me to be as erroneous to force them * Amongst these, that proposed by M. Laporte, in his Etudes Entotnoloffiques, ought not to be omitted ; in which Termes, Libellula (with Perla and Ephemera), Aphis, and Coccus, are raised to the rank of distinct orders. DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS INTO ORDERS. 29 into the larger groups as it is to regard them as orders equivalent with the great ones, such as Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Sec. It is indeed impossible not to be convinced that in many of these groups the structure of one order is partially lost, and that of the adjacent one assumed, whence it would be as correct to place the insects in the one as in the other order. Indeed, it appears to me to be the strongest evidence of the forcing of nature to a preconceived system, when we see introduced amongst a number of animals, characterised by a constant peculiarity of structure in some important organs, an animal, or group of animals, which does not possess such character, and find such a step attempted to be justified on the plea that this organ is variable in other groups. With a view to avoid some of the inconveniences which still exist in the distribution of insects, I would propose the following classifi- cation in which the approach of the Hymenoptera to the Trichoptera, and of the Lepidoptera towards the Diptera, as pointed out by Mac Leay, together with the direct passage between the Trichoptera and Lepidoptera, and the descending series in the first, and the ascending series in the second columns must be borne in mind. CLASS OF HEXAPOD METAMORPHOTIC INSECTS. Subclass, 3Iouth toith Jaws. Subclass, Mouth ivith a sucker. (Dacnostomata W.) (Antliostomata W.) Ord. Hymenoptera. Ord. Diptera. ? Osculant Ord. Strepsiptera. ? Osculant Ord. Homaloptera. Ord. Coleoptera. "^ Oscu\a.ntOrd.Apha7iiptera.* Osculant Ord. Euplexoj>tera (Earwig). Ord. Orthoptera. Ord. Heteroptera (includ- ing the Water Bugs). ? (Thrips?)t ? Ord. Neuroptera. Ord. Homoptera. ? ? Ord. Trichoptera (Phryganea alone). Ord. Lepidoptera. ? .? Moreover, the relationships existing between the opposite orders must not be overlooked. Since, in some instances, as between the * The relationship of the Flea with the Hymenoptera, insisted upon by Strauss, does not appear to me to be well founded. f Order Thysanoptera Haliday, by whom an elaborate paper upon this tribe of remarkable insects has been published in the Entomo^.Mag. No. 15. April, 1836. 30 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. Orthoptera and Heteroptera, they are so strong as to become direct . affinities according to some authors. As, however, it has been the fashion to commence the series of orders with the Coleoptera (which it is true is the greatest in extent), 1 have followed the general plan, the effect of which will be the introduction of the Hymenoptera and Strepsiptera between the Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. With this explanation we take our leave of the modern distributions of the orders of insects, which from the nature of the present work it would have been in- consistent to have passed over in a more concise manner ; the reader having been put into possession, not only of the modes of classification adopted by all the most recent authors of any eminence, but also of the principles upon which such distributions have been proposed. IV. Bibliographical References. (Coleoptera.) (A. Coleoptera in General.) Fahricius. Syst. Eleutheratorum, 2 vols. Kil. 1801. 8vo. Olivier. Entomologie, 8 vols. Paris, 1789. 4to. Schonherr. Synon. Insect. Holm. 1 806 — 27. 4 vols. Svo. Dejean. Catal. des Coleopt. Paris, 1821. Svo. 2d edit. Paris, 1833. 3d edit. 1836. Dejean and Latreille. Hist. Nat. Col. d' Europe, livr. 1 — 3. Paris, 1822. Svo. Dejean and Boisduval. Hist. Nat. Col. d'Europe, livr. 1 — . Paris, 1829 — . Svo. Germar. Insect. Nov. Spec. Coleopt. Halle, 1824. Svo. Jahlonshy and Herhst. Natursystera aller Bekannten Insecten. Berlin, 1783 — 95. 10 vols. (40 cah.) 1783 — 95. Svo. with atlas of plates. Voet. Descript. et icones Coleopt. La Haye, 1 766. 2 vols, 4to. pi. ; ditto, Ger- man edition by Panzer, 4to. Erlang, 1793. Schwartz. Nomenclatur iiber die Roselschen und Kleemanschen insecten. Erste Abth. Kafer. Nurnberg, 1793. 4to. Knock. Beitrage zur Insecten geschichte. Leipz. 1781. Svo. Knock, Neue Beitrage zur insecten kunde. 1801. Svo. Thunherg. Numerous Memoirs in the Swedish Trans. (Vet. Acad. n. Handl. 1781. 1804. 1806. 1814. 1816. and in Nov. Act. Upsal.) Bilberg. In Nov. Act. R. Soc. Upsal, t. 7. ; and in Mem, Acad. Sc. St. Petersb. t. 7. 1820, MUUer. P. W. G. in Germar's Magazin. vol. iii. and iv. Schaller. Neue Ins. (Coleopt.) in Naturf. Gesellsch. Hale, b. i. Laporte. Etudes Entomologiques. Paris, 1834. Svo. Laporte and Gory, Hist. Nat. des Coleopteres. Paris, 1S35. Svo. in parts. Audouin and Bndlt. Histoire Nat. des Insectes. vol. iv. 5. 6. Coleopt, Paris, 1834. Svo. Bonelli. Observ. Entomol. Turin, 1809. 4to. Vigors, in Zool. Journ. Nos. 3. and 4. Kirhy, in ditto, vols. i. ii. iii. biblioghaphical references. 31 ^ Hope. Descriptions new Coleopt. in Zool. Soc. Trans, vol. i. 4to. Duncan. Naturalist's Library. Beetles. Edinb. ] 835. Small 8vo. Lion Dufour. Reclierches Anatomiqiies sur les Carabiques et sur plusieurs autres Insectes Colcopteres in Annales des Soc. Nat. 1824 . B. Coleopterous Faunists. a. Great Britain. Martyn. The Engl. Entomologist, exhibiting all Coleopt. Insects, &c. Lond. 1792. Martin Lister. De Scarabceis Britan. in Hist. Insect. Raii. Lond. 1710. 4to. Marsham. Entomologia Britannica, tom. i. Coleopt. Lond. 1802. Svo. Stephens. Illustr, Mandibulata, vols, i — v. 1828 — . Burrell, in Trans. Ent. Soc. vol. i. (old series.) Wilson and Duncan. Entomol. Edinensis. Edinb. 1 834. 8vo. Dillwyn. Observations on the Coleopt. of Swansea. Swansea, 1829. Svo. Pri- vately printed. b. Other Countries of Europe. Soisduval and Lacordaire. Faune Entomologique de Paris. 1vol. 12mo. 1836. Illiger. Verzeichniss der Kafer Preussens, &c. Halle, 1798. Svo. niiger. Supplement to ditto, in his Magazine, vol. i. 1802. Kugellan, Kafer Preussens in Schneider's Ent. Mag. vol. i. Erichson. Kafer der Mark Brandenburg, vol. i. Svo. Berlin, 1837. Creutzer. Entomol. Versuche. Wien, 1799. Svo. Kunze. Entomolog. Fragmente. Halle, 1818. Svo. Nicolai. Dissert. Col. sp. Halensis. Halle, 1822. Svo. Sturm. Deutschland Fauna. Kafer. 1805 — 38. 10 parts. ISmo. Harrer. Beschreibungen zu Schaeffer's Naturl. Ausgemahlten Abbildung. Re- gensburg. Insecten. Regensb. 1791. 4to. Preysler. Verzeichniss BUhmischen Insecten. Prag. 1790. 4to. Hoppe. Enumeratio Insect. Elytratorum circa Erlangam indig. Erlang. 1795. Svo. Duftschmidt. Fauna Austriae, oder Beschreibung der Osterreichischen Insecten &c. Linz, 1803—1825. 3 vols. 12mo. Beck. Beitrage zur Baierschen Insecten Fauna, &c. Augsburg, 1817. Gistl. Enumeratio Coleopt. Monacensis. Munich, 1829. Waltl. Verzeichniss Kafern in Spanien. &c. Isis, 1832. Panzer. Beschreibung seltener Kafer (in Der Naturforsch. 24. stu.) Frljhlich. Ditto in ditto, stu. 23. and 26. Ahrens. Beitr. Deutscher Kafer. in Neue Schr. Naturf. Gesells. Halle, v. ii. Malinowsky, in ditto. vol. i. Eschscholfz. Zoologischer Atlas, fol. Ditto, in Mem. Act. Nat. Mosc. vol. vi. Ditto, in Mem. Acad. Soc. St. Petersburg, vol. vi. PaUiardi. Beschreibung zweier Decaden. Svo. Wien, 1825. Clairville. Entomologie Helvetique. Zurich, 1798 — 1806. 2 vols. Svo. (Pre- daceous Land and Water Beetles and Weevils). Laicharting. Der Tyroler Insecten. Zurich, 1781 — Svo. Bassi, in Annal. Soc. Ent. de Paris. 1834. Sturm and Hagenhach. Coleoptera Alpina (Nov. Act. Cas. Acad. vol. xii.) Villa. Coleoptera Europee Dupleta. Milan, 1 833 ; with suppl. of n. sp. 32 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. Gen6, in Act. Acad. Turin, torn. 39. (Italian Coleoptera). Detharding. Disputatio de Insectis Coleopt. Danicis. Buetzovii, 1763. 4to. Pauli. Dissert, de Coleopteris Daniac. 4to. Butzov. 1763. TayhuV. Fauna Suecire. 8vo. Upsal, 1798. 1800. Zetterstedt. Insecta Lapponica. Leipz. 1838. 4to. vol. i. fasc. 1. pp. 191. f. 2. Hoffmansegg. Portugeis Kafer, in Illiger's Magaz. vol. ii. and vi. Gyllenhal. Insecta Suecica. Classis 1. Coleopt. Scara. 1808. 1827. 4 vols. 8vo. Sahlberg. Dissert. Entomol. Insecta, Fennica enumerans Coleoptera. Aboae. 1817. 8vo. Eschscholtz. Nova genera Coleopt. Faunas Europae. Bull. Soc. Mosc. vol. ii. Zouhkoff, Krynicki, Mannerheim, Faldermann, Steven, Gebler, Hummel, Bohemann, and Fischer. Descriptions of many detached Russian Coleoptera by these Authors in the Memoires and the Bulletin Soc. imper. des Naturalistes de Moscow. Pallas. Icones insect. Rossiae Siberiaeque. Erlang. 4to. 1781. c. Asia. Germar. Mem. sur la Faune Ent. de Kolywan (Siberia) in Isis. 1825. Faldermann. Coleoptera of China, Mongolia, &c. Ditto Coleopt. Persico, Ar- menias (in Mem. Acad. imp. St. Petersb. torn. ii. 1835.) Perty. Observationes nonnullae in Coleoptera Indiae Orientalis. Monachii, 1831. 4to. Wiedemann. Several articles in his Zoologisches Magazin. vol. i. and ii. Hope. Synopsis of Nepaul Insects, Coleoptera (in Gray's Zoological Miscell. No. i. London, 1831. 8vo.) MacLeay. Annulosa Javanica. London, 1824. 4to. d. Africa. Goldfuss. Enumerat. Insect. Eleuth. Capitis Bonae Spei, totiusque Africae. Erlang, 1804. 8vo. Hausmann. Ins. Cap. Bon. Sp. Illiger's Mag. vol. vi. JFvIfen. Descr. quorund. Capens. Ins. 4to. Erlang. 1794. Klug. Bericht iiber eine auf Madagascar sammlung Coleoptera. Berlin, 1833. 4to. (From the Abhandlung. der Kongl. Akad. der Wissenschaft, zu Berlin.) e. Australasia. Schreibers. Descriptions of some New Holland Coleoptera (in Linn. Trans.), vol. vi. Hope, in Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. vol. i. pi. 1, 2. f. America. Say. Descriptions of Coleoptera of North America, in Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci- ences, Philadelph. vol. iii. and v. Contributions to the Maclurian Lyceum of Philadelphia, in American Phil. Trans, vol. iv. New series. And in the Journal of the Nat. Hist. Soc. Boston, vol. i. 1 836. Leconte, in Annal. of Lyceum of New York. December, 1824. Harris, in ditto ? Hentz, in Journ. of Acad. Nat. Scienc. Philadelphia, vol. v. PaykuU. Faunae Insect. Amer. Boreal, Prodromus. 4to. Erlang. 1794. COLEOPTERA. 33 Chevrolat. Coleopteres du Mexique. Strasbourg, 1834. 12mo. in parts. K/tiff. Entomologiffi Brasilite Specimen, and Specimen alterum (in Nova Acta Natura; Curios, vol. x. and xii. ). Perty. Delect. An. Articul. Brasiliae. fol. Munich, 1 830. Sahlberg. Periculi Entomologici (chiefly Brazilian Coleoptcra). 4 pi. 1823. 8vo. Lacordaire. Observations on the Habits of the Beetles of Brazil (in Annales des Sci. Nat. for 1830, and in Nouv. Ann. du Museum). Order COLEOPTERA Aristotle. Char. Anterior wings (elytra) horny or leathery, concealing the posterior wings when unemployed, horizontal, united down the back by a straight suture. Posterior wings membranous, longitudinally and transversely folded when unemployed. Mouth with transversely moveable jaws. Pupa incomplete.* This order comprises the extensive tribes of beetles, and, in respect to the size of some of these insects, or the number of individual species^ must be regarded as occupying the foremost rank amongst insects. From our earliest childhood, when, at school, we learned the cruel trick of putting a pin through the tail of a Cockchafer to see it "spin;" or caught the pretty ladybirds, and watched them take their flight from our hand, exclaiming, in the words of the childish couplet — " Ladybird, ladybird, prythee begone ; Thy house is on fire, and thy children at home," we have been familiarized with the leading character of this order of insects, derived from the structure of the wings and elytra, from whence, indeed, the name of the order, signifying " wings in a case," was given to them by Aristotle. In the earlier editions of the Sys- tema Natures it was even employed as its sole characteristic ; so that the Grasshoppers, Cockroaches, and Earwigs were included in it ; and, * It has been usual to apply the character of the pupa to designate the peculiar nature of the metamorphosis in general. This is, however, very incorrect ; since the Coleoptera are thereby defined to have an incomplete metamorphosis, whereas their metamorphoses are complete, in the ordinary acceptation of the word, the pupa being on the contrary incomplete. Moreover, Linnaeus applied this and other similar terms to the pupa, and not to the metamorphosis ; the confusion originating in their misappropriation by Fabricius. 34; MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. in the last edition of this work, the last-named insect was still retained, from the straight suture by which the upper wings are united when unemployed. These insects, however, although nearly agreeing with the beetles in the structure of the mouth, are widely separated by the nature of their metamorphoses, which consist in a simple cast- ing of the skin from time to time, the larva nearly resembling the perfect insect, the pupa being also similar, but furnished with rudi- mental wings, and being active ; whereas, in the beetles, the larva is quite unlike the beetle, and the pupa inactive. So that, on the whole, this may be considered as one of the most definitely marked groups of the animal kingdom. Mr. MacLeay has indeed {Horce Entomol. p. 421.) considered its insulation as the result of accident, although it is a group of that precise kind which he has since proved (in his Letter upon the Dichotomous System) to be a perfectly natural one. The number of species of this order with which entomologists are actually acquainted cannot be less than 35,000* ; and it is more than probable that, when the number of species of foreign climes shall have been collected, the number will be doubled, if not trebled, as we may, indeed, conceive by noticing the great proportion of European species already in the lists. In this surprising number we find the most brilliant colours and most singular forms, with a variation of size from the most bulky to the most minute of the insect tribes. Hence, it is not surprising that these insects should have attracted the great, and even absolute, attention of so many authors and ama- teurs ; and which has probably been increased by the comparative largeness of size and superior consistence of their external covering, whereby they are rendered so much easier in collection, preservation, and examination. In addition to the characters given above the following may be men- tioned: — The head is furnished with a pair of antennae, of which the form varies very greatly, even in the sexes of the same species, but which, except in a few instances, consist of eleven joints. The eyes are large and lateral ; and, in a few species, each is divided by a horny sinus (being part of the skull), so that in these four eyes appear to exist, an example of which occurs in Gyrinus. The simple ocelli are here wanting, except in Paussus bucephalus, and some of the small Staphylinidae, in which Dalmann observed two tubercles on the crown of the head, which he considered to be ocelli, but Latreille * The Berlin Museum alone contains 28,000 species. COLEOPTERA. 35 considered them as mere tubercles. Curtis and Brulle have, however, recently discovered a small frontal tubercle in some of the Dermes- tidae, which appears to be an ocellus, as it is indeed named by the former. The mouth consists of an upper lip, generally transverse ; a pair of horny jaws ; a pair of lower jaws of less firm consistence, furnished with an articulated palpus, and a lower lip, also furnished with a pair of similar but shorter palpi ; the lip itself (labium) arises from a transverse horny plate (mentum), articulated at its base with the head. The second segment is by far the largest ; it is generally termed the thorax, but, strictly, it is only the first thoracic segment (prothorax), having the fore- legs articulated to it on the under side. Latreille has claimed the discovery of a pair of spiracles on the inner membrane of this segment ; Messrs. Kirby and Spence had, however, previously noticed it. (^Introd. iii. p. 43.) The second thoracic segment (mesothorax) is very short, and is scarcely visible from above when the insect is at rest, the only ex- posed part consisting of a triangular plate (scutellum, or, more strictly, scutellum of the mesothorax), on each side of which the elytra are attached ; this segment also bears on its under surface the middle legs. The third thoracic segment (mesothorax) is larger in size than the preceding, bearing on its upper surface, near the anterior angles, a pair of membranous wings, and on its under surface the pos- terior legs, of which the basal joint is large and transverse. The ab- domen is intimately attached by its entire breadth to this last tho- racic segment, and generally consists of six or seven segments (the typical number being nine), each having a pair of spiracles at the sides, or upper surface ; the tarsi vary in the number of the joints, from two to five. In an order of such extent as the present, it is not surprising that some few variations from these typical characters should exist ; thus in some, as the females of the Glowworm and Drilus, the organs of flight are entirely wanting. Many genera of Carabidae, Cured ionidse, &c. have elytra, but no wings : in some the elytra are soldered together ; others again, as Molorchus, Buprestis, &c. have the wings only longitudinally folded ; others, as Meloe, have the elytra lapping over each other ; and in some the elytra are narrowed, and do no^ meet in a straight line down the back, — Sitaris, &c. The only character which prevails throughout the order is that derived from the metamorphosis, which is of that species which has been termed D 2 36 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. (but erroneously), incomplete, the term being applicable only to the pupa State. The larv 4. i. ii.), and smooth or but slightly clothed with bristles. The body is oblong, rarely ovate, and the posterior legs have a vertical as well as a horizontal motion, the pectoral laminae (coxge) to which they are attached, being small {fig. 4. 9.). Mr. Kirby has observed that in all those species which have the anterior tibiae notched (with the exception of those which have the elytra dis- tinguished by elevated ridges) there is usually a series of from twelve to thirty ocellated impressions near the lateral margins of the elytra on the 8th, or between it and the 9th furrow : these impression, but not ocellated, also exist in Cicindela ; the typical number of furrows is nine, but in Omophron and some others there are fifteen {Faun. Bor. Amer. p. 7.) Fig. 3. 6. represents an elytron of Omaseus me- lanarius. Many species are furnished merely with rudimental wings : these, however, in some instances are fully developed in certain spe- cimens of the same species ; occasionally also the elytra are soldered together, whence these insects are distinguished from the Cicindelidae, which are especially fliers, by their great activity and running powers, and whence they have been termed by Messrs. Kirby and Spence, Eupodina. The body of these insects is of a very firm consistence, whereby they are enabled to creep about under stones, &c., as well as * In the genus Trigonodactyla, as has been observed by M. Audouin, the max- illae are terminated by an articulated hook. •f" These lateral appendages, or paraglossce, as they have been termed, have been generally considered to be portions of the lip itself; such, however, is not the case, as they are evidently the exserted margins of the internal lingua or tongue {Jig. 3. 4, 5. ). 60 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. prevented from falling beneath the power of the insects which they attack; most of the species of this family being eminently insectivorous, prowling about on the surface of the ground, under stones, &c., or beneath the bark of trees, or in the moss growing at the roots of the latter, in search of their prey, which consists of larvae, or of herbivorous beetles and other insects, sometimes even attacking their own species. Latreille in like manner informs us (^Histoire Generate, &c., vol. viii. p. S?^.), that the Scarites gigas burrows into the earth under cow-dung in sandy places by the assistance of its an- terior palmated fore legs, which singular habitat appears to be ac- counted for by the circumstance, also stated by him, that when confined with some of the stercoracious lamellicorn Beetles (Helio- cantharus sacer, &c.), they pull them in pieces and devour them ; and M. Lefebvre de Cerisy, who has published some observations upon the same species, informs us that they are nocturnal insects of prey remaining in their retreats during the day, but sallying forth at night and preying upon such Melolonthae, &c., as fall in their way. These latter insects seem indeed to be a favourite food of the Carabidae in general, for the former author elsewhere states that the chief nourish- ment of the true Carabi consists of the larvae of insects and of herbi- vorous beetles, such as Cockchafers, Rosechafers, &c., which, as Mr. Dill- wyn also observes, they certainly prefer (Memoranda, p. 56.) Latreille adds that the beautiful Carabus auratus, which is probably thence termed in France " Le Jardinier," devours more cockchafers than all the other enemies of these destructive insects by attacking and killing the females at the period of oviposition, and thus preventing the birth of thousands of young larvae. These insects are therefore of es- sential service in keeping down the numbers of noxious insects with which our gardens and pastures might otherwise be overrun. It has been suggested to me by a celebrated zoologist, that the carnivorous quadrupeds which are the analogies of the predacious land beetles, in like manner prey upon herbivorous quadrupeds.* * The anterior tibijE of a great number of the species are deeply notched near the tip, on the inside ; and Mr. Curtis has noticed an interesting peculiarity of structure in the anterior tibiae of the genus Cillenum, which are not only armed with the two ordinary spurs (one above and the other below this notch), but have, also, two additional deflexed spines at the outer extremity of the notch, between which spines he presumes the lower moveable spur is received : hence he conceives that these notched anterior legs of the Carabida are used in seizing and retaining their prey, for the limb of an insect being received into the notch, and the lower COLEOPTERA. CARABID^. 61 The habits of the family are not, however, exclusively carnivorous, since some of the species generally found in cornfields are clearly ascertained to feed upon growing grain ; thus Nicolai observes re- specting Broscus cephalotes "in agris occurrit frumenti \ astator videtur, certe ejus larva." (^Dissert. Inaugural. Sfc. Halce, 1822, p. 12.) La- treille also says " J'ai vu souvent raristus bucephahcs grimper sur des graminees en arracher les bales et les emporter avec ses mandibules." {Regne Animal, vol. iii. 1st ed. p. 190.) : hence, he was induced in the Coleopteres d'Europe, to consider that the Scaritides were less car- nivorous than the other Carabidae. Its larva, however^ resembles that of the CicindelEe, both in form and habits ; and as the carnivorous habits of another of the Scaritides had been previously observed upon by him as above mentioned, it seems not improbable that the circumstance noticed, of the Aristus thus feeding upon grains, was accidental. The larvae of Zabrus gibbus {Jig. 2. 6.) also, upon the authority of Germar and other German naturalists {Magaz. der JEntomol. vol. i.), which are produced from numerous clusters of eggs a short time previously deposited by the females, feed during the night upon the young shoots of wheat, occasionally doing great mis- chief, as in the instance recorded by Germar, where 230 acres of wheat in the canton of Seeburg, near Halle, were destroyed by it. During the day these larvae were observed to bury themselves in the earth several inches deep ; they remained about three years in this state, and attained their full size in June, when they formed for themselves an oval cavity in the earth, sometimes two feet deep, in which they became pupte, appearing in the perfect state at the end of a month, when they resumed their destructive habits by climbing up the stalks and feeding upon the grain. When confined in a box in which several ears of corn had been placed, they first fed upon the grains ; and when they had consumed the whole, they then attacked each moveable spur being then pressed upon It, the insect would be effectually secured, whilst the spurs of the posterior legs are supposed to be employed in securing a firm footing upon the objects they wish to destroy or tear to pieces. The former of these suppo- sitions is probably correct; indeed, a direct observation in support of it will be found in the account of the Cantharida; : the latter, however, is pi-obably, less correct, since many insects, which have the spurs of the hind legs much developed, are remarkable for their leaping and shuffling kind of motion, as Orchesia, Platyura, &c. I imagine that the claws alone are employed in retaining hold of objects by insects whose tarsi are simple. 62 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. Other, These larvae were accompanied, in the proportion of about one fourth by the grubs of the Melolontha ruficornis Fah. which, from belonging to a group of insects eminently destructive to the roots of vegetables, must have augmented the mischief. Messrs. Curtis and Stephens have, indeed, doubted whether any portion of the injury is attributable to the Zabrus, the latter author considering that it might rather have been entirely caused by the grubs of the chaffer, and that the larvae of the Zabrus (belonging to a decidedly carnivorous group) contributed to lessen the damage by devouring the other larvae whilst the perfect insect ascended the corn for the purpose of feeding upon the insect parasites thereon, and hence questioning whether the de- struction of the Zabri would be desirable. The opinion of Mr. Stephens {lUust. Brit. Ent. Mandib. i. 140.) was adopted also by Messrs. Au- douin and Brulle in their first volume. Contrary, however, to these opinions, we have the express statements of Germar and Kollar [Naturg. Sch. Ins.) : the circumstance of the imago eating the grain when confined, the comparative paucity of the grubs of the chaffer, whence it would happen, were the larvae of the Zabri really carnivorous, that they would be unable to find sufficient food to supply their ravenous appetites ; moreover, the grubs of the chaffer are subterraneous, whilst it is stated that the young growing shoots were devoured, and lastly, the circumstance that the perfect Zabri are constantly found in corn- fields and even upon the ears of corn, crawling up the stems or hovering upon the wing just above the heads of the corn, as Mr, Vigors has informed me that both sexes may occasionally be observed. The question, however, has been set at rest, at least as regards the perfect insect by the Rev. G. T. Rudd, who has stated to me that he and a friend distinctly perceived several specimens of Zabrus upon the ears of corn, opening the husks and extracting and devouring the grain. He has subsequently published an account of this circum- stance in the Entomological Magazine, vol. ii. p. 182.* I have in like manner noticed several of the large black species of Harpalides running about pathways near cornfields, especially in the evening, and creeping from amongst the standing wheat, where it is probable that they have been feeding during the day : their appearance * Messrs. A udouin and Brulle, in the fifth volume of their work upon the Coleop- tera, adopted this opinion, being contrary to that which they had entertained in the fourth volume of their work. Mr. Tulk has also informed me, that he has kept several Zabri alive, for many months, feeding them upon grain. COLEOPTERA. — CARABID^. 63 in the evening, although it certainly bespeaks a predacious dispo- sition, does not disprove their herbivorous habits during the day. I have also occasionally observed several of the metallic-coloured species of Harpali, Aniarae, &c., amongst the upper branches of umbelliferous and other plants during the autumnal months, where it is not im- probable that they ascended for the purpose of feeding upon the ripe seed. M. Zimmermann, in a valuable memoir upon the genus Amara has published an account of their habits, from which it appears that vegetable substances form their chief support ; they feed upon the pith and stems of graminea?, succulent roots, and likewise upon the larvae of other insects which they can master; they eat much, as may be seen from the swelling of the abdomen. Hence, as Messrs. Au- douin and Brulle (v. p.29 ) observe, this genus, together with the Zabri, compose a group of herbivorous species amongst the carnivorous family to which they belong. Signor Passerini has also published a Memoir upon the ravages occasioned to young wheat by the larvae of Zabrus gibbus and Calathus latus. Some of the Harpalides, as we are informed by the Rev. Mr. Bird, not only fly by night, but are attracted to the light of a lamp, some- times in great numbers. {Entomol. Magaz. ii. 41.) Mr. G. R. Water- house has also informed me that a specimen of Harpalus ruficornis flew into his chamber in which a light was placed, a short time previous to a storm ; hence it is evident, not only that these insects seek their prey by night, but that their flight is high, and that they are subject to the same influence arising from lights as moths. Mr. Curtis has also recorded a similar circumstance respecting Harpalus griseus. The flight of the former insect, shortly previous to a storm, is also curious, as it is well known that many insects are peculiarly liable to be affected by sudden atmospherical changes. Some of the species, especially the larger Carabides, exhale a fetid odour, discharging at the same time from the abdomen to a con- siderable distance a caustic and acrid fluid, whence some of them, as the Carabus auratus, already mentioned, have obtained the name of " Vinaigriers" in France; indeed, as in the instance recorded by De Geer, in which some of this fluid was discharged into the eyes of his friends, it is capable of producing very violent pain for several moments.* It is owing to the rapid volatilisation of this liquid, that the genus Brachinus makes the explosions subsequently described. * See Dufour, Recherch. Anatom., p. 204. 64) MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. In like manner Anchomenus prasinus (one of the Harpalides) is said to combat its enemies with repeated discharges of smoke and noise. (^K. and S. ii. 24)7.) They also discharge a very acrid liquid of a black colour from the mouthy when captured or whilst eating, which pro- duces similar effects on the skin to those caused by powdered can. tharides ; indeed, by the ancient physicians they were employed in medicine as being highly vesicatory, whence Geoffroy considered them to be the Buprestis of the ancients, which were accounted as a dangerous poison to cattle. Latreille, however, in a valuable memoir upon these poisonous insects in the tenth volume of the Anncdes du 3Iuseum, has satisfactorily shown them to have belonged to the modern family Cantharidae. Olivier informs us that a sort of soap is made by the natives in some parts of Africa from a species of Carabus, to which he gave the specific name of Saponarius, belonging to the subfamily Harpalides ; and from information given by M. Dumolin to Dejean, it appears that these insects are not employed in the manufacture as aflPording alka- line matter, as had been supposed, but for the fatty matter which is obtained from them. The majority of the Carabidse inhabit the elevated regions of the southern parts of Europe, Asia, and North America. The first of these quarters of the globe is, however, their chief metropolis, none other possessing so great a number of species. In England we scarcely possess more than 400 species. The insects composing the true genus Carabus disappear as we go either to the North, or towards the tropics, whilst the allied genus Calosoma is distributed over Europe, Africa, America, and New South Wales. The genus Pam- borus is confined to the latter country, whilst Procerus and Pro- crustes are chiefly found in the countries bordering the northern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, where other equatorial genera begin to make their appearance. Some species are found upon the margins of streams or standing water, whilst some of the Carabi and Pteros- tichi, &c. are only found on the tops of the highest mountains. Again, many of the species of the Brachinides are generally found either upon the trunks or beneath the bark of trees.* These species are likewise more variegated in their colours and lest robust in their • It is evidently owing to this circumstance that some of these insects are occa- sionallj' found embedded in gum anime, in which substance I have observed several beautiful species. (See also Germar, Mag.Ent. v. i. p. 13. G. Lebina.) COLEOPTEHA. — CARABID/'E. 65 Structure than the majority of the family. They are also cha- racterised in many instances by having the tarsi dilated, and the penultimate joint more or less bilobed in both sexes, a peculiarity re- sulting, as Bonelli has observed {3Iem. Acad. Turin, vol.xxiii.), from the situations in which they reside, this structure being in fact ana- logous to the cushioned feet of flies as well as of those of the true herbivorous Beetles. M. Lacordaire has confirmed these observations in his account of the habits of the Brazilian Coleoptera (^Ann. Sc. Nat, June, 1830). The internal anatomy of the Carabidse has been investigated by M. Dufour, in the A7males des Sciences Naturelles, for August, Oc- tober, and December, 1824. Ramdohr also has published an accomit of the anatomy of Carabus monilis, in the Magazin Gesellsch. Na- turf. zu Berlin, vol. i. ; and Dr. Burmeister's 3Iemoir on the Anatomy of the Larva of Calosoma, published in the Transactions of the Ento- mological Society, vol. i., must also be mentioned. Few observations have hitherto been made relative to the larvce of this family : this may indeed, perhaps, be partially accounted for, from the obscure situations in which they are found, and from the difficulty of rearing them. Those, however, which have been noticed, are equally voracious with the perfect insects, and are found in sirhi- lar situations : they are generally long, with the body of equal breadth tiiroughout, and the head of a moderate size, with the rudimental eyes equal ; a scaly square prothorax, and with the eighth segment simple, and resembling the remaining joints: the terminal segment is, however, armed with two conical horny appendages, toothed in the Carabi and Calosomae, but (according to Latreille, whose state- ment I am, however, inclined to doubt) long, fleshy, and articulated in the larva? of the Harpali and Licini ; in the latter, also, the body is shorter and the head larger. The part where the anus is situated is prolonged into a membranous deflexed tube, which serves as a sup- port to the tail: the jaws resemble those of the perfect insect. The larvae of Ditomus hiicephalus, however, according to Latreille [Regne A71. second edit. t. iv. 190.), resemble those of the Cicindelae, whilst that of Omophron decidedly approaches the form of those of the Water-beetles (Dyticidae). One of the most voracious larvsc in the family, is that of Calosoma Sycophanta, first described by Reaumur, in the third volume of his Memoires. It is black, with six scaly legs : when full-grown it is F 66 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. an inch and a half long, subdepressed and fleshy; the upper surface of each segment and the head are, however, more scaly ; the tail is terminated by two horny spines, and the head is armed with two powerful jaws, wherewith it seizes the body of its struggling prey, which consists of the fleshy larvae of Lepidoptera. As it is very ravenous, devouring several large Cater- pillars in a day, it has the sagacity to find its way to the nests of the gregarious processionary Moths, in the midst of which it takes up its abode ; and Reaumur states, that he never found a nest of these Caterpillars which was not infested with from one to six of these larvee : here they feed in the midst of their prey (not even sparing them when they have become chrysalides), in so gluttonous a manner that the segments of the body become distended, and ren- der it unfit for any movement, so that it becomes an easy prey to its young and more active brethren, which, in mere wantonness, seize it with their jaws, although surrounded by their natural food. All Reaumur's larvae died before they became perfect insects ; but there can be but little doubt, that they are the larvae of the Calosomae, of which, as Reaumur observes, the habits are precisely similar ; in- deed, Clairville, and the French entomologists, appear to entertain none upon this subject. And M. Boisgerard, in a communication made to M. Audouin (published by the latter, in the Hist. Nat. Ins. t. V. p. 9\:.), states, that having placed some female Calosomae upon trees greatly infested with the Caterpillars of Bombyx Dispar, the larvae of the Calosomae were found in the following season in the nests of the Caterpillars, and that in the course of two or three years the trees were cleared. Dr. Burmeister has published a very elaborate account of the anatomy of the larvae of Calosoma Sycophanta (which is not rave in the pine forests in the vicinity of Berlin, where, both in the larva and perfect state, it devours the Caterpillars of Bombyx Dispar, and other Moths,) in the first volume of the Transactions of the Entom. Soc. of London, illustrated with two plates. This larva does not confine itself to Lepidopterous Caterpillars, for Nicolai informs us, that it is occasionally found in some profusion, in the pine forests near Halle in Germany, devouring the larvae of the Saw-fly of the pine, Lophyrus Pini. [Dissert. Inaugural, p. 13.)* M. Audouin has also published (in the Hist. Nat. Ins. vol. v. p. 99.) an account of the larva of one of the largest European species of the * Dr. Ratzeburg has given several very characteristic figures of this larva (as well as of that of Cicindela campestris) in his Forst. Insect, (pi. 1.), just published. COLEOPTERA. — CARABIDJE. 67 family, Procrustes coriaceus, found in France, and also, but very rarely, in England : the larva resembles that of the Calosoma ; it is corneous, subcylindric, and terminated by two sti'ong curved spines, each of which is furnished beneath with a smaller spine. It is about an inch and a quarter long, lives under moss and in damp situations, whei'e it feeds upon snails and slugs. It is full grown in the spring, be- comes a pupa at the beginning of May, in a cell which it forms in the ground, and remains in that state not more than a fortnight. Tlie perfect insect also feeds upon snails. Dr. Heerhas described and figured the larvae of the following species of Carabus and of Cychrus rostratus in his Observationes Entomolo- gicoc, 1836. The larva of Carabus auronitens [fig. 2. i.) is very similar to that of Calosoma in its general form, the mandibles sickle-shaped with a strong tooth inside at the base, and the terminal segment of the body armed on each side with a thick horny spine with a spur on each side. The antennae are 4-jointed, as well as the maxillary palpi : the eyes are simple ocelli, there being six on each side. It was found on the 1st of June under a stone, and was transformed to the pupa on the 3d, and to the imago on the 15th of the same month. The pupa (^fig.1. 2.) is of an ordinary form, with the abdominal seg- ments rounded at the sides, and furnished on each side with a fascicle of hairs; the arial segment is terminated by two conical appendages. The larvae of Carabus depressus and C. hortensis are also very similar to the preceding, differing chiefly in the greater or less breadth of the abdominal segments, and in the greater elongation of the anal fork, which are simply setulose. Clairville also states, that the larva of one of the species of the restricted genus Carabus, which he had noticed, precisely resembled that of Calosoma, figured by Reaumur. F 2 68 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. Dr. Heer states, that the larva of Cychrus rostratus {fig. 3. 3.), " 3 Caraborum larvis capite parvulo, palporum articulis exterioribus eras- sioribus, mandibulis erectiusculis, et corporis forma breviori latiorique facile distinguitur ; " in addition to which the prothorax is conical, and the anal segment very short, with the hinder angles prominent, and armed in the middle with two very short and simple spines. De Geer has figured a larva [Memoires, vol. v. pi. 12. f. 1 — 3.) closely resembling that of Calosoma, which was found in the ground, and which he presumes to be the larva of one of the species of this family. He was not, however, able to rear it. In the first edition of the CoUopteres d Europe, M.Latreille announced a memoir upon a larva sent to him by M. Westermann from Bengal, supposed to be that of Anthia Q-guttata. This larva, since the death of Latreille, has been described and figured by M. Lequien in his Mo- nograph upon Anthia, published in M. Guerin's Magasin de Zoologie, Insectes, pi. ^l., and by Messrs. Audouin and Brulle, in their Histoire naturelle des Insectes. It is nearly three inches and half long {fig. 2. 8.) with a subcylindric scaly body, consisting of twelve segments, exclu- sive of the head {fig. 2. 9. under side of head), which is armed with strong acute mandibles, very short three-jointed antennae, and a single pair of eyes ; the upper side of the head is rugose with several tubercles in front ; the terminal segment is scabrose, serrated at the sides, with a deep notch at its extremity ; this segment is furnished beneath with a single fleshy anal prolog. The second ? and nine fol- lowing segments are respectively furnished with a pair of lateral spiracles ; the mentum and maxillae are long and extend almost to the base of the head. The legs are short. This larva is of a black colour, with the posterior margins of the segments obscure red. It has not been stated upon what grounds this larva was considered as that o^ Anthia 6-guttata, and indeed upon comparing the details of its structure, and especially its trophi, with that of the known Carabideous larvae, I have no doubt that it does not even belong to any^f this family ; since, in its general appearance and organisation, it approaches much nearer to the larvae of the Elateridce.^ * Since the above was written, I have received the following communication from M. Westeimann himself, relating to this larva, in answer to the inquiries which I was induced to make concerning it : " With the greatest pleasure I shall give you all the information in my power of the circumstances which led me to believe that the larva I brought from India, and sent to the late M. Latreille, was that of Anthia 6-guttata. M. De Haan of Leyden made a similar inquiry last year, and I informed COLEOPTERA. — CARABID/T.. 69 The larvae of Zabrus gibbus {Jig. 2. c.) already mentioned, are described and figured by Germar in the first volume of his magazine; they are long and flattened, being nearly of equal breadth throughout, except towards the tail, which is gradually narrowed : the body ap- pears to be of a more fleshy consistence than in the majority of these larvae, and the body is terminated by two small spines. The pupa does not present any material characters. A Swedish naturalist, M. Acre!, in a Memoir inserted in the sixth volume of Nova Acta, of Upsal, relating to larvae and other objects sometimes found in the human stomach, has described and figured a larva which he considers to be that of Sphodrtis leucopthal- mus, and which had been ejected from the stomach of one of his patients. Such, of course, is not the real habits of this insect, since Latreille considers that the larvae figured by Gcedart, {Jig. 107. a, b,) are referrable either to this species or to Abax striola. Certainly, Gcedart's insects, in their general appearance, strong jaws, and pre- dacious habits, coincide with the typical larvae of this family, one of them being described as preying voraciously upon softer larvae ; and the other, which remained in the larva state two years, and of which he has given the transformations, feeding, not only on other larvae, but also on the pupae of ants, the eggs of mole crickets, &c, I am not certain to which species of the family the larva which I have represented in Jig. 2. 4. is referable ; it agrees, however, with him that being on a visit in Burdivan in Bengal, one night returning home I ob- served by the light in a lantern the larv£E crawling in the road. I immediately took it to be the larva of some large Coleopterous insect, but had not the least idea to which it belonged till the day after, when I observed at the foot of a large Banian tree several Anthia guttata, which I could not, however, secure, as they retreated into holes when I came near them. I therefore ordered ray palankin-bearers to dig them out, when we at the same time obtained another of the larvae found on the pre- ceding evening ; without being positive, as I wrote to M. Latreille, I now naturally considered it to be that of an Anthia and concluded it was in the habit, during the night, of leaving its hole and crawling about in search of worms. M. De Haan hav- ing observed to me that this larva, whereof he had seen a figure in the French works, appeared according to his observations to belong to an Elater, I informed him that on the very tree where we obtained the larvae from the holes at the roots, I found Elater fuscipes Fabr., in great abundance; this being the largest Elater which ever came under my observation in Bengal. I think this larva is much too large for such an insect, nor should I think a larva of an Elater would crawl so well on the ground. In other parts of India very large Elaters are found ; in Java I once took a pair as large as E. flabellicornis." Copenhagen, July 5. 1836. F 3 70 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. the typical larvae of the family. And as I have found numerous specimens of it, as well as others, but slightly differing from it in essential characters, I have little doubt that it belongs to one of the large common black Harpalides (perhaps Steropus madidus, or Omaseus melanarius^, and do not hesitate to give it as an example of the group. It is black and scaly, the head {fig. 2. 5. under side) is armed with two acute mandibles, two moderately long 4-jointed antennae, two long 4-jointed maxillary palpi, and two short thick labial palpi ; there are six small simple eyes on each side behind the antennae, set in a circle. The under side of the head is scaly, the parts of the mouth being inserted near the front ; the legs are moderately long, and the terminal segment of the body is armed with a pair of horny bifid spines. The larva represented in Jig. 2. 7. was described and figured by Desmarets {Bulletin Soc. PhilomaL vol. i.), whose reasons for re- garding it as that of Omophron limbatum appear to be satisfactory : it is of an intermediate form between that of the larvae of the Cava- bidcB and Dt/ticidce, being oblong, depressed, narrowed behind, with the head very large, and broader than the rest of the body, and armed with two veiy robust jaws, and other usual parts of the mouth, two 5-jointed antennae, and two small eyes placed at the sides of the head ; the tail is formed of a slender 4-jointed appendage, with two hairs at its extremity ; the legs are moderately long. It was gene- rally found in moist sandy places on the banks of the Seine, where the perfect insect was also met with in company with it, the food of both consisting of small sub-aquatic insects. The larva is very active, and, when touched, throws up its tail in the manner of a Staphylinus. The anatomical observations of M. Dufour seem to confirm the intermediate location of this genus between the Carabidae and Dyti- cidae ; the perfect insect, although unable to swini, cannot live except in damp situations, and, indeed, Clairville placed it at the head of the Water-beetles. M. Zimmerman, in his Monograph upon Amara, has given some ac- count of the early stages of the insects of this genus. Considering some species as annual, and others as producing two broods in a year, and that the period of their appearance is not, like that of Moths, &c. fixed to a particular time, he adds, that the duration of life of these insects, from their bursting from the eggs to their death, never exceeds a year, whilst, in some species, it is certainly shorter. Those which COLEOPTEUA. — CAUABID^E. 71 appear at the end of the summer in the perfect state, generally couple in the autumn, whilst in others this does not take place until the following spring. The eggs do not arrive at maturity until seve- ral days after coupling ; they are deposited under stones, or at a small depth under ground. The larvae soon appear ; they change their skin once, and attain, previous to becoming pupa;, twice the length of the imago: the larvae have the same general form of those of the Zabri and Poecilli, and are so much alike that it is not possible to distin- guish the species. They remain about six or eight weeks as larvae, and half that time as pupae ; the perfect insects are able to live a much longer time, especially if coupling is delayed, immediately after which they die. Latreille is the first author who directed the attention of ento- mologists to the distribution of the numerous groups composing this family. So far indeed from abandoning the hope of effecting a natural arrangement (as asserted by Mr. MacLeay), he has proposed a classi- fication of them " fondee sur des rapports naturels" in the CoUopteres d'Europe which appears to me to be the most natural of any given, and which I propose to adopt in the following pages. He considers that the first group having truncated elytra, and noted for their ex- plosive powers (Brachinidae MacLeay, Truncatipennes, Latr.) is con- nected on the one side with the Cicindelidae by means of Anthia and some other genera; and on the other, to the second group dis- tinguished for its fossorial habits, having the elytra separated from the thorax by a wide incision (Scaritidae 3IacL., Bipartiti Latr.) by means of Enceladus and Siagona. From this second group he pro- ceeds by Aristus and Acinopus to Zabrus, Cephalotes, &c. in the third group composed of the Harpaliens and Feroniens (Harpalidae MacL., Thoracici Latr.^ distinguished by their great quickness in running; whence by means of Licinus, Panagaeus, &c. we approach the fourth group, having the inner surface of the anterior tibiae not notched, and which emit an extremely acrid fluid (Carabidae MacL. Abdominales, Lati\^, from which by Nebria, Elaphrus, &c., we arrive at the fifth group, composed of the genus Bembidium, having the last joint of the maxillary palpi minute and acute (Bembidiidae Stephens, Subulipalpes Latr.), which approach the Water-beetles in their sub- aquatic habit : the genus Haliplus, amongst the latter, closely re- sembling Bembidium in the curious structure of the palpi. Other instances in support of Latreille's arrangement may be given ; F 4 72 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. thus Ozsena hitherto regarded as one of the Bipartiti of Latreille, is now, from its explosive powers, proved to belong to the Bombardiers ; whilst on the other side Mr. Curtis has suggested that a connection between the Scaritides and Harpalides may be effected by means of the genera Miscodera (Leiochiton Curt.) and Clivina ; but a more beautiful connecting link between these two subfamilies exists in a yet undescribed insect from New Holland in the collection of the Rev. F. W. HopCj which strongly partakes of the characters of botli groups ; whilst between the Harpalides and Carabides the genus Eurysoma (Brachygnathus Perty) having the appearance of Cychrus, may be mentioned, as well as the genus Tefflus, regarded by M. Brulle as more nearly allied to Panagseus than to Carabus. Latreille, indeed, was subsequently induced to adopt an arrange- ment of these groups proposed by Dejean by commencing with the Abdoniinales or Carabides, and in so doing has pointed out other apparent transitions ; but in their more recent works, both authors have abandoned the latter arrangement and adopted that given above, with the exception that Dejean has raised these five groups, as well as two others, separated from the Harpalidae, to an equal rank with the Cicindelidae. Mr. MacLeay, also, in his Atmulosa Javanica, has elevated the sections of the Linnaean genus Carabus to an equal rank with the last-mentioned family ; but from pursuing a quinarian ar- rangement of the Geodephaga, he has been enabled only to admit four divisions of the Carabidae. The group of Bembidiidae is there- fore sunk, the structure of the palpi being considered insufficient for its support : if this character were indeed the only distinctive mark of the group, this step might still be questioned, as no other Carabidae possess such a structure ; but the group is also characterised by the minute size, great agility and subaquatic habits of the insects of which it is composed ; moreover, in point of number of species, it is not an inferior group. If even it were to be suppressed, its situation would evidently be nearer to Elaphrus than to Harpalus, which would, of course, interfere with Mr. MacLeay 's distribution, which (notwith- standing his remark upon the Latreillian distribution) is, with the exception of the suppression of the Bembidiidae, identical with that given above ; the progression being merely reversed, by which means a passage is effected between the Cicindelidae and Elaphrus amongst the Carabidae*, which two families he considers as forming a normal * Mr. Curtis has adopted this view in his observations on Pelophila, although in those upon Elaphrus, he regrets that Dejean should have removed that genus and COLEOPTERA. — CARABID/E. group, having entire tibiae, whilst, in his three other families, which he terms aberrant, they are deeply'notched. Messrs. Kirby and Spence divide the Carabida; into two subtribes, 'Lamprona, named from the brilliancy of colour of manj'of the species and corresponding with Latreille's Abdominales, and Amaurona or those of obscure colours, and comprising all the other groups of La- treille, the latter subtribe being divided into stirpes, as Truncipennwwa, &c. ; these stirpes, however, being evidently of equal value with the entire subtribe Lamprona, this primary mode of division cannot be considered satisfactory. Mr. Stephens has proposed six families of Carabideous insects: — 1. Brachinidae MacL. 2. Scaritidse MacL. 3. Carabidte MacL. 4. Harpalidee MacL. 5. Bembidiidae Steph., and 6. Elaphridae Steph. This distribution is, however, evidently unnatural, separating, as it does, the Harpalidte and Scaritidae, and the Carabidae and Elaphridae. No affinity, moreover, is traced between the Scaritidse and Carabidae. Other modes of distribution have been proposed by Zimmerman (Monog. Amaroidum), Laporte (^Etudes Entomol. livr. i.) and Brulle {Hist. Nat. Ins. Col. vol, i.), which it would be tedious to detail, In all these arrangements, however, the Harpalides are divided into three groups, corresponding with the Simplicimana, Patellimana, and Quad- rimana of Latreille {Regne Animal, 2d ed.). The latest arrange- ment of these insects is that of Mr. Kirby, given in the Fauna Boreali- Americana, and which is as follows : — ■ Eupteia. ( Cicindelidce. ) Geodephaga. Eutrecha. " Acutipalpia fTruncipennia. I' (Brachinidaj M'L.) i^i . ■ ■ f Nobilia (Carabiis, &C.1 Obtusipennia. i — - - ^ . ' ■' Hygradephaga. \Plebeia (Nebria, &c.). Sarrothropoda. I (Chla?nius. ) I rDimana(Agoniim,Calathus, t_Cystopoda. < and Foronia, &c. ). (_ Qiiadrimana (Harpalus). Quadrimana. ( Stenolophus. ) < \ 1 Dimana, L (T Subulipalpia. (Peryjihiis, Bembidium, &c. ) Filipalpia. (Elaphrus. ) Trechus, Patrobus, &c,). Omophron (both belonging to the same group) from the termination of the Carabidae, considering the latter genus as " ordained by nature perfectly to connect the Carabidae with the Dyticidae." 74? MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. Mr. Kirby as well as Messrs. Laporte and Brulle have also adopted the plan of subdividing the primary gVoups into numerous minor sub- divisions named after the typical genus in each : thus by both the last named authors, the Brachinidae are divided into six minor groups, not however corresponding with each other, as the sixth subdivision (Brachinites) of Laporte embraces Brulle's 1st, 5th, and 6th, sub- divisions. In considering the different primary divisions of this very natural family, as possessing a value inferior to that of distinct families, and as constituting collectively one family of equal rank with the Ci- cindelidse, I am but treading in the steps of Linnaeus, Latreille, Kirby, and Leach, as well as in those, I cannot but think, of nature herself, notwithstanding the numerical majority of the Carabideous over the Cicindelideous insects. The following is a concise tabular sketch of these different groups which I have considered as sub-families, termi- nating them, for uniformity, in ides. A. External maxillary palpi terminated by a joint at least as large as the preced- ing (fff- 3. 2.). a. Anterior tibite having a deep notch on the inside, near the tips (Jig. 3.12.). * Elytra generally truncated behind (_^^. 3. 7.). Tarsi! 1. Brachinides. of the $ seldom dilated at the base. J ( Bombardiers. ) ** Elytra rounded at the extremity ; abdomen pedun- ^ 2. Scaritides. culated ( X9- 3. 14.). j (Burrowers.) *** Elytra rounded behind; abdomen not pedunculated "13. HarpuUdes. (Jig.4..i.). J (Black clocks.) b. Anterior tibiee not notched near the tip (//ff. 4. 12.) -! '/t>- u * \ ^ ^"^^ ^ L (Uischargers. ) B. Palpi terminated by a minute conical joint (fy. 4. 18.). -! * / c 1 !!^ ' .•*' \ The first sub-family Brachinides, in addition to the truncature of the extremity of the elytra, are characterised by having the head and thorax narrower than the abdomen (Jig. 3. 7. Lebia Crux minor, 8 ungues, 9 antennae). The labium is often oval or square, and occasionally furnished with two small lateral linear lobes : in many of the smaller species the penultimate joint of the tarsi is bilobed {^g. 3. 10. anterior tarsus of Cordistes), and the anterior tarsi of the males are very rarely dilated at the base ; in some of the large exotic genera, as well as in the true Brachini, .the body is apterous, whilst others are very narrow and subcylindric, and have been supposed to be allied to the cylindric Cicindelidae. * Their colours are more * M. Brulle places his division Trigonodactylicns at the head of the Carabidae, M. Audouin having observed that the maxillaj in the typical genus have the terminal unguis articulated, as in the Cicindelidae. COLEOPTERA. CARABIDiE. 75 pleasantly variegated than in the majority of the family. Other pecu- liarities have already been pointed out. This sub-family, as at present constituted, is perhaps the most in- congruous of all the sub-families of the Carabidae, the term Trunca- tipennes applied to it by Latreille by no means indicating a constant character, as many of the species have the elytra rounded at the tips. The tarsi indeed are generally alike in both sexes, or if dilated in the males, the dilatation is of a different character from that of the other sub-families. In may, indeed, be rather regarded as a convenient receptacle for such groups as have not the bipartite and palmated structure of the Scaritides, the simple tibiae of the Carabides, the dilated male tarsi of the Harpalides and its subdivisions, or the minute conical terminal joint of the maxillary palpi of the Bembidiides. The tarsal claws are often denticulated (^fig. 3. 8. claws of Lebia) ; but this structure is found elsewhere in the family. The typical species of this sub-family are endowed with a means of defence of the most singular description, from whence they have derived the name of Bombardier-beetles, and which was first men- tioned by Rolander in the Transactions of the Academy of Stockholm for 1750. When the insect is attacked by other and larger insects, or placed in a situation of danger, it suddenly emits from the anus a fluid of so highly volatile a nature that, immediately upon coming into contact with the atmospheric air, it becomes a bluish vapour of a very pungent scent, accompanied with considerable explosion, whereby the insect is enabled to effect its escape. This it is enabled to repeat seven, eight, or even a dozen times. It is stated by an anonymous author {Ent. Mag. iii. 377.), that on immersing a specimen of Br. Gra'cus in boiling water, it let off one of its explosions, and the water V6 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. for about an inch around it effervesced much in the same way as a Seidlitz powder. The typical species Brachinus crepitans Linn., is not uncommon, being found in company under stones ; and it is stated that these communities have been found at times to consist of at least a thousand individuals. The effect of this vapour upon the skin is very similar to that produced by nitric acid. M. Dufour has published a description of the organs by which this fluid is secreted in the Brachinus balista, which will be found in the eighteenth volume of the Annates du Museum, as well as in the sixth volume of the An- nates des Sciences Naturelles. * Kuhn has also published an account of the habits of these insects in the thirteenth volume of Der Natur- forscher. Some authors have thrown doubts upon the statement that the explosion of these insects is accompanied by a noise ; the fol- lowing circumstance, however, communicated to me by the celebrated traveller Burchell, will be sufficient (were other evidence wanting, which is not the case) to confirm the correctness of the recorded statements. Whilst resting for the night on the banks of one of the large South American rivers, he went out with a lantern to make an astronomical observation, accompanied by one of his black servant boys ; and as they were proceeding, their attention was directed to numerous beetles running about upon the shore, which, when cap- tured, proved to be specimens of a large species of Brachinus : on being seized they immediately began to play off their artillery, burning and staining the flesh to such a degree, that only a few specimens could be captured with the naked hand, leaving a mark which re- mained for a considerable time ; upon observing the whitish vapour by which the explosions were accompanied, the negro exclaimed in his broken English, with evident surprise, "Ah I massa, they make smoke." The late traveller, Ritchie, communicated to Mr. MacLeay some particulars respecting this secretion ; his companion, M. Dupont, having taken a nest consisting of more than a thousand individuals near Tripoli. He says the crepitating matter made Dupont's fingers entirely black when he took them : it is neither al- kaline nor acid, and it is soluble in water and in alcohol {Kirhy and Spence, Int. iv. p. 143.). From a communication made by Mr. Holme to the Entomological Society ( Trans, vol. ii. p. 7.), it would appear that the crepitation may be produced for a considerable time after the * Also in the <' Recherclies Anatomiques," p. 204. COLEOPTERA CARACIDiE. 77 death of the insect by pressing the abdomen near the anus, probably until the secreting organs are become rigid. Mr. R. H. Lewis also states that the New Holland species of Lebia emit a very pungent odour, resembling muriatic acid, which, applied to the nostrils, pro- duces considerable irritation. Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. vol. i. p. 81. The British genera are Drypta, Polystichus, Odacantha, Demetrias, Dromius, Lebia, Lamprias, Tarus, and Brachinus. The only British species contained in the genus Polystichus is a curious insect about one third of an inch long. It has lately been captured in considerable numbers on the coast -of Suffolk, and has been regai'ded by all English authors as the Polystichus fasciola- tus of Rossi, from which, however, it is distinct. M. Brulle, who has corrected the synonymy of this and the allied species, has given to the English species the name of P. vittatus. The only English species of the genus Odacantha is one quarter of an inch long, of a bright tes- taceous colour, with the head and thorax blue. It is found in Nor- folk, and some of the other eastern counties, and has lately been taken in profusion by the Cambridge entomologists in the reedy fens in that neighbourhood. It is also found in the sedge boats upon the river Cam, having escaped from the bundles of sedge_, which is brought in great quantities to Cambridge. M. Brulle mentions, that many hundred specimens of this insect were taken under the bark of trees growing in water in Italy, although they have never since oc- curred in the same locality, and, indeed, are very rare in the neigh- bourhood. The species of the genus Dromius are amongst the smallest Carabideous insects, and are generally found under the bark of trees, especially during the winter. A memoir upon this genus has been published, in the Transactions of the Entomological Society, by C. C. Babington, Esq., in which the difficult synonymy of many of the species has been cleared up. The genera Lebia and Lamprias are regarded as congenerous by the French entomologists, notwithstanding their evident distinction. The species of both are very elegantly diversified with different colours, and are generally rare. Like the Dromii, they are often found under the bark of trees. Some of the species of Torus have the palpi consider- ably dilated in the males {Jig. 3. ll.), which induced Fischer to form them into a distinct genus, named Anomeeus. They are chiefly inha- bitants of Europe. The genus Brachinus [Jig. 3. 12. anterior tibia) contains about forty 78 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. species, which are very widely distributed. Their explosive proper- ties have been already described, to which may be added, that both sexes possess this power. M. Solier has published a memoir upon this and the allied genera in the Annals of the Entomological Society of France, vol. ii., to which M. Brulle has published a reply in the fourth volume of the same work. In addition to the genera enumerated above, Mr. MacLeay has suggested that the genus Plochionus Dej. may be expected to occur in the south of England or Ireland, particularly Plochionus Bonsfilsii Dej. {Annul. Javan. No. 1.) ; but, from the observations of M. Bar- thelemy, it is evident that the insect last named is imported into France from the island of Martinique, with Cassia bark. {Ann. Soc. Ent. France, vol. iii. 429.) The following are amongst the most remarkable exotic genera be- longing to this subfamily : — Anthia, Weber, comprising some of the most gigantic species in the whole family ; in some of which the males have the mandibles of an immense size, and the thorax, as it were, divided into two parts. M. Lequien has published a monograph upon this group in Guerin's Magasin de Zoologie. The large East Indian species, Anthia sex- guttata is found, according to Mr. Westermann, at the roots of the Banian tree. The majority of the species are from Southern Africa ; there are some observations on the habits of these insects in Burchell's Travels in the Interior of Southern Africa, 1824', by whom one of the species is named A. eflFugiens. This genus, Avith Helluo and its allies, exhibits a peculiarity in the clothing of the under side of the anterior tarsi, {fig. 3. 13. Helluo.) The species composing the allied genus Graphipterus have some- what the appearance of broad Cicindelge. They have been gene- rally considered to be nocturnal in their habits ; but M. Lefebvre, whilst in Egypt, observed the habits of one of the species, which was discovered by him running about in the hottest part of the day, at the commencement of March near the confines of the desert. He likewise observed that it produces a very distinct noise, by rubbing the posterior femora against the margins of the broad elytra. {Ann. Soc. Ent. France, No. 3.) The beautiful South American genus Agra is distinguished by its long narrow body ; the thorax being conical ; the maxillary palpi filiform, and the labial terminated by a securiform joint. According COLEOPTERA. — CARABIDiE. 79 to M. Lacordaire, the species, which are numerous, are found upon trees, preferring those leaves which have been rolled up by other insects, upon which they sit, remaining immoveable, Avith the fore legs and antennae stretched forwards. When approached, they escape quickly, falling amongst the grass. Their long neck and head are said to hin- der them from walking quickly, these parts being constantly brought into contact with the leaves upon which they are in motion. Dr. Klug has published a beautifully illustrated monograph upon this rare genus in his Entomological Monographs. The elegant exotic genus Casnonia Latr. (Ophionea Klug, or rather, Colliuris De Geer, but not of Lafr.)'is distinguished by the very long cylindrical neck-like thorax, wide head, prominent eyes, and broad elytra. The species are of small size ; the type is the Attelabus pensylvanicus Linn. M. Lacordaire has observed that they reside in marshy places, running very quickly on the margins of streams, and taking flight readily, when they are easily mistaken for small Ci- cindelae. The genus 3Iormolyce Hagenb. comprises the largest known Cara- bideous insect, the form of which is quite flat, and so extraordinary that it would scarcely be recognised as a Coleopterous insect. The head is attenuated behind the eyes into a very long narrow neck; the thorax has the lateral margins strongly denticulated ; and the elytra are dilated at the sides and extremity into a very broad leaf- like appendage, giving the insect the aspect of a Mantis. The notched tibiae, and structure of the mouth and posterior trochanters appear to give it the affinity with Sphodrus, as suggested by Latreille, of which genus it is even regarded by M. BruUe merely as a subgenus. Its situation has, however, greatly perplexed systematists. By Klug and St. Fargeau {Enc. 3Ieth.) it is arranged with the Brachinides ; the for- mer placing it between Drypta and Agra, with which last it has some general resemblance in form, with the exception of the dilatation of the elytra; whilst Mr. Curtis considers it natural to place it as 'the head of the Coleoptera and Eumorphus at the end, thereby to com- plete the Coleopterous circle. I would suggest that, as its general appearance indicates a certain weakness of structure, very unlike that of the Harpalides, and as, out of the many individuals which I have examined, I have never been able to find an individual with dilated anterior tarsi, it would be more natural to consider it as allied to the 80 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OP INSECTS. Lebije and some other of the Brachinides*, which are found under the bark of trees, it being in such situations in Java that the Mormo- lyce is said to be found. It is subject to considerable variation in size : the largest specimen vi^hich I have seen measures three inches and a half in length, and is in my collection. M. Laporte de Castelnau has suggested that the extraordinary larva described by Perty, and sub- sequently noticed under the family Lampyridse, may be that of Mor- molyce {Hist. Nat. Anim. Art p. 119.). I cannot, however, adopt such an opinion The genus Ozcena Oliv. has been placed by Latreille and Dejean amongst the Scaritides ; its characters are, however, very unlike those of that sub-family ; and M. Lacordaire has observed, that the Brazilian species possess similar explosive powers to those of the Bra- chini ; hence Messrs. Brulle and Laporte have introduced this genus into the latter family. {Ann. Scienc. Nat. June, 1830. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, No. 4.) Most of the species have a curious tubercle near the base and apex of the margin of each elytron. I have published a memoir upon this and some new allied genera in Guerin's Magasin de Zoologie, 1834. The extraordinary North American genus Pseudomorpha Kirby {Linn. Trans, vol. xiv. Heteromorpha Kirby, ibid., pi. 3. f. 3. Axino- phorus Z>e/.) may also be here mentioned. Although exhibiting the characters it has not the aspect of a Carabideous insect, and might be mistaken for a large Nitidula. It appears to have been previously described by Illiger under the name of Drepanus. Its situation is very dubious ; Mr. Kirby thinking it nearer to Omophron than to the Brachinides, with which in several respects it agrees, and in which it is arranged by Dejean, whilst Latreille in his last works has placed it amongst the Feroniens. The head and thorax are very broad, and the legs and antennae short. But a still more extraordinary genus is Adelotopus Hope {Trans. Ent. Soc. pt. 1.), in which the body has all the appearance of an elongated Gyrinus, and the antennae are clavate. In some other respects, it is nearly allied to Pseudomorpha. I have communicated a memoir upon these and some other equally singular allied Australian insects to the Linnaean Society. * This opinion has been confirmed by the recently publishctl observations of Count Mannerheim, who has described the sexual distinctions of this insect. (Bvll, Soc. Imp. Mosc. 1837, p. 26.) coLEoriERA — carabid.t;. 81 The second sub-family Scaritides (Bipartiti Latr.) is distinguished by having the elytra separated from the lunate thorax by a consider- able space, which causes them to appear pedunculated (^Jig. 3. 14. Scarites laevigatus), and they are rounded at the extremity ; the antenna; are short, and often elbowed {Jig. 3. 15.), the first joint being long ; the head is large ; the tarsi {Jig. 3. 18. under side of tarsi of Scarites) are generally alike in both sexes ; and the tibiae of the fore- legs are broad, and very much dentated {Jig. 3. 17.) or palmated, wherewith the insects are enabled to burrow in the earth or sand ; the mandibles {Jig. 3. 16.) are generally very powerful, and internally armed with broad teeth. These insects are for the most part found under stones, and in holes in the ground near water, or upon the sea-shore. They appear to be chiefly nocturnal in their habits, and hence their colours are for the most part black or obscure. The larger species are chiefly inhabitants of the New World. Their numbers are much more limited than those of the Brachinides or Harpa- lides. Latreille and Dejean consider these insects as not carnivorous, but Olivier and De Cerisy have stated, that they are insects of prey, and that S. gigas lurks by day in holes and under stones, and sallies forth at night to feed upon Melolonthidae and other insects which may fall in its way. (See Ann. Jav. pt. 1.) M. Lacordaire states that the species of Scarites burrow in the sand of the sea-coast in South America, but are more generally found under the stumps of felled trees ; whilst one of the species, Sc. anthracinus Dej., is necrophagous, being found in half-decayed carcasses. Scarites lajvigatus, according to an anonymous author {Ent. Mag. vol. iii. p. 177.)> feeds upon live sand shrimps (Gammari ?) upon the shores of the Mediter- ranean, which it drags out of their perpendicular burrows. The genus Scarites comprises some of the largest species in the family : that found in this country is very rare ; the body is oblong, subdepressed, the antennae strongly elbowed, and the jaws armed with strong teeth. I have already noticed the habits of Scarites gigas. M. Brulle* has observed, upon the sea-coast in Greece, a quantity of the Scarites laevigatus running about in the hot sunshine, and entering into circular burrows in the sand, from which they passed and repassed without apparent reason : " car il ne transpor- * Hist. Nat. Insectes, col. 2. p. 35. G 82 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. tait point de proie." He conjectures that they were occupied in searching for their mates. I should however rather consider that, as in the case of the Scarites laevigatus already, and a species of Dyschirius subsequently, mentioned, they were searching after other insects (which formed these burrows) for their prey. M. Lefebvre has de- scribed, in Guerin's Magasiii d'Entomologie, a remarkable monstro- sity occurring in a specimen of Scarites pyracmon, in which three distinct tibiae and tarsi arise from the extremity of one of the anterior femora. The Oxygnaihus anglicanus Hope is a remarkable insect, of which a single dead specimen was picked up near Peckam, Surrey. It is half an inch long, and is evidently an insect imported from the tropics. Brulle considers it identical with the Camptodontus Cayennensis Dej. The character pointed out by Mr. Curtis, for the discrimination of the species of Clivina, is not constant ; the C. fossor sometimes occurring with ample wings. See the observations of Mr. Stephens upon this subject (Illust. Mand. i. 177.). The insects considered as distinct species by English entomologists are regarded as varieties of C. fossor by some Continental authors. The species composing the genus Dyschirius, Bonelli, are the smallest of this sub-family, never exceeding one-sixth of an inch in length, and, like the Dromii, their numbers in temperate climes far exceed those of the larger genera. Their colours are generally black, tinged with brassy green. There appear to be twelve or fourteen British spe- cies, of which the D. gibbus is very common in damp situations. Ac- cording to Ahrens, however (who has published a monograph upon this genus in Thons Entomological Archives, vol. ii.), the insect described by Gyllenhal, Dejean, &c. as the gibba, is distinct from the true gibba of Fabricius ; the former insect, which is our common British species, is described by him under the name of C. minima, whilst Mr. Curtis has also described another British species under the latter name, which must consequently be changed. The Rev. G. T. Rudd has published some observations upon the habits of one of the species of this genus, noticed by him upon the Yorkshire coast : " On turn- ing up the sandy tracks or burrows above high-water mark, to uncover the Hesperophili (species of Brachelytra), I found their fero- cious enemy, the aforesaid Dyschirius, pursuing his work of destruc- tion. These Dyschirii burrow after, seize, shake, as the Cicindela cam- pestris does its prey, and devour the luckless Hesperophili: so intent are they on their purpose, that I have frequently observed them to COLEOPTERA. CARABID^E. 83 shake their victhii aftei* they were both brought to light." (^Entom. Mag. vol. ii. p. 181.) Amongst the exotic Scaritideous genera may be mentioned Oxys- tomus, remarkable for its narrow elongated form and the very large size of its falcate mandibles, from South America ; Ditomus, of which the males have the head generally armed with a strong occipital horn, chiefly from the shores of the Mediterranean (see Brulle, Expedition Scientijique de Moree) ; Enceladus, comprising a single species of large size, from Angola, having the anterior tibise quite simple ; Siagona, having the body quite flat ; Carterus, having the anterior tarsi of the males dilated ; and Apotomus, having the maxillary palpi of very great length, and composed of a few minute European species, with long slender legs and the thorax narrow. The genus Carenum is confined to New Holland; the Eutoma tinctilatus Neivm. being merely a linear species of that genus. This genus exhibits a re- markable character, which has not hitherto been noticed, and which exists in no other Carabideous insects, namely, the maxillae are des- titute of a terminal hook {Jig. 3. 19.). The third subfamily Harpalides (Thoracici Latr.) is far more extensive than any of the other subfamilies, and is distinguished by having the elytra sessile and not pedunculated, entirely covering the abdomen, and rounded at the extremity {Jig. 4. i., Abax striola). The palpi are not terminated by a minute conical joint {Jig- 3. 2. 4.); the anterior tibiae have a deep notch near the tip, but are not palmated ; the basal joints of the two or four anterior legs are dilated in the males {Jig. 4. 2. anterior male tarsus of Broscus cephalotes ; 4. 3. ditto, Abax striola ; 4. 4, 5, ditto, Harpalus rufipes, above and beneath ; 4. 6, 7, ditto, Chlsenius, above and beneath) ; the body more or less elongated, G 2 84< MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. and the neck scarcely ever distinct. The mentum is produced on each side into a rounded lobe, the centre portion being deeply emar- ginate, occasionally entire (^fig- 4. 8. Licinus), but generally with a short spine in the centre of the emargination, which is sometimes notched at the tip (^fig. 3. 3.). This subfamily comprises a vast number of species, divided into numerous genera by Bonelli and the more recent entomologists, forming small natural groups, which are, nevertheless, very difficult to characterise, their structure gradually passing into the adjacent forms, so that it is almost impossible to fix their limits with any degree of precision ; which difficulty is still further increased by the obscure tints and slightly varying characters of the species. Latreille and Dejean have divided this subfamily into three groups, which, from the structure of the anterior tarsi of the males (upon which they are chiefly founded), they term Quadrimani, Simplici- mani, or-pedes, and Patellimani. Mr. Stephens, however, considering the impossibility of distinguishing genera from such a mode of dis- tribution, when the females alone are known, has given a table {lllustr. Brit.Ent. Mand. vol. i. p. 67.) founded upon characters common to the sexes ; the mentum, however, upon the variation in which he has founded his chief divisions, is hable, as he himself admits, to con- siderable variation. Moreover, the general results of this table are similar to those of Latreille's mode of division ; whence I propose to adopt the latter, especially as, in his later works, Latreille has added other characters to distinguish his three groups. Messrs. Audouin and Brulle have noticed (without acknowledging the observation as that of L. Dufour, JRech. Anat. Col. pi. 21*. f. 3-5.) a peculiarity in the construction of the tarsi of the Patellimani (Chlseniens), the males of which have the cushion-like clothing of hairs on the under surface of the foot generally dis- tributed over the sole of the tarsus {Jig. 4. 6, 7.) In the Quadrimani (Harpaliens) the dilated joints of the anterior male tarsi are furnished beneath with a double series of narrow cushions, which, in H. rufipes, appear to be fleshy and transversely striated, and to be destitute of pilosity {Jig. 4. 4, 5.). This character, although it may be sufficient to separate the Chlaeniens from the Harpaliens, as suggested by Messrs. Audouin and Brulle, does not, however, appear to be a fixed character, being liable to much variation in the Feroniens ; thus, in Abax striola, each joint is provided with a double hairy cushion, ex- tending beyond the extremity of the joint {fig- 4. 3.) ; but in Broscus COLEOPTERA. — CARABIDJE. 85 cephalotes the" cushion of each joint is entire and nearly circular (^fig. 4. 2,) ; and Burmeister figures a tarsal joint of Zabrus, with cushions transversely striated, as in Harpalus. Comparatively few of the species are ornamented with metallic colours, the majority being of black or obscure tints, whence they have obtained in some parts of the country the name of Imps. Mr. Stephens mentions that they are greatly infested with Gordii. The metallic species of Amara and Poecilus are termed Sun-beetles, from their habit of running about footpaths during hot sunshiny weather. The obscure coloured species, on the contrary, are barely seen by day, chiefly coming abroad in the twilight, thus affording an instance of that dis- tribution of colours which I have often observed in other groups ; from which it is evident that, although Nature is lavish in her brilliant hues, they are only bestowed upon those which, from the nature of their habits, are exposed to the glare of light and to the view: The subfamily Harpalides is closely allied on the one hand to the Scaritides as above mentioned, whilst some of the genera (Licinus, Badister, Panagseus) approach the aberrant Carabides ; others again, as the Trechi, are intimately allied to the Bembidiides. 1. The first division (Feronidea Westw., Feroniens Z)eJ,, Simplici- mani Latr.) has the two anterior tarsi of the male alone dilated, the basal joints not being oblong nor orbicular, thefour posterior tarsi simple. The central tooth of the mentum is generally notched at the tip. The characters of many of the genera of this section are so un- decided, that Dejean has expressed his inability to separate them pre- cisely, and has accordingly united them into one great genus, Feronia, which he has subdivided into various sections ; still, how- ever, to a practised eye, their appearance is so distinct that, with a little tact, they may be at once recognised. 2. The second division (Harpalidea Westtv., HarpaViens De/ean, Quad- rimani Latr.) has the four anterior tarsi dilated in the males (j'%'. 4. 4., anterior male tarsus, Harpalus). The mentum-tooth is generally acute, but never notched : in some genera, however, it is almost im- perceptible ; the claws of the tarsi are simple, and never toothed. I have added the genus Trechus into the synoptic list of the British genera, from its decided affinity with Stenolophus. 3. The third division (Chlfeniidea Westic, ChlaeniensZ)e/., Patellimani Latr.) has the anterior tarsi of the males with two, three, or four of the basal joints square or cordate, with the anterior angles rounded, and G 3 86 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. not acute {fig- 4. 6. anterior tarsus of Chlsenius). The legs are generally long, and the thorax often narrower than the abdomen. Amongst the British genera the following are most worthy of notice : — Division 1. The species of the genus Pogonus are of small size, not exceeding one-third of an inch in length. They are found in the salt marshes bordering upon the coast, which are, during the winter, entirely covered with Avater. Mr. Curtis has published some interest- ing observations upon these insects in his Brit. Ent. p. ^T-, commu- nicated by Mr. Burrell. The Rev. F. W. Hope has informed me that he has noticed the subpellucid margins of the thorax and abdomen of Calathus rufangu- lus to be slightly phosphorescent, which he conceives must have arisen from the insect feeding upon dead carrion lying on the shores of the Thames, whence the luminosity may be caused by the decomposition of the putrid matter which the animal had eaten. Perhaps, however, it is more probable that the luminosity arose from some of the matter in the midst of which the animal had been feeding still adhering to the surface of the body. Mr. Curtis has given a beautiful figure of a remarkable species of this genus, under the name of C. latus Dej. ; but the C. latus Linn, is regarded by M. Brulle as synonymous with the C. cisteloides, whilst the C. latus Dej. is the C. punctipennis Germar. In the genus Sphodrus the males have the trochanters of the hind legs produced into a long spine (^fig. 4. 9.). The typical species is one of the largest Harpalideous insects, and is found in dark cellars and outhouses. The species of the genus Agonum are very numerous ; they fre- quent damp situations; some, as the A. marginatum^ 6-punctatum, and fulgens, are of brilliant metallic colours, but the majority are black or obscure. They do not exceed one- third of an inch in length. The genera Broschus and 3Iiscodera, in their pedunculated abdo- mens, considerably resemble the Scaritides. The type of the former genus is found upon the coast ; that of the latter has the appearance of a large Dyschirius, but the anterior legs are not palmated ; the structure of the antennee, trophi, and tarsi (having three dilated joints in the males) is also indicative of its situation amongst the Harpalides, as suggested by Latreille, in the Rcgne Animal. This insect has COLEOPTERA. CARABIDiE. 87 lately been taken somewhat plentifully by the entomologists of the North of England, by one of whom, W. Hewitson, Esq., I am informed that the Leoichiton Readii of Curtis is a variety only of M. arctica. The investigation of the species of the genus Amara is attended with very great difficulty, and has been much neglected. Dejean de- scribes sixty-three species ; Stephens gives twenty-six as British. M. Zimmerman has recently published a valuable memoir upon the genus in Gistl's Faunus (Munich, 1832), in which the species are carefully analysed, and several new subgeneric groups proposed. The genus Zabrus is nearly allied to Harpalus in the following sec- tion. I have already detailed its natural history in the introductory observations upon the family, M. Zimmerman has published a me- moir upon this genus and its allies, in his Monographia Amaroidum. The anterior tibiee are terminated by a pair of strong spurs. Division 2. The genus Harpalus is of very great extent, and requires a much more minute revision than has hitherto been given to it. The genus Masoreus is at once distinguished from all the British Harpalides by the posterior lobe of the thorax, a character which , exists in Lebia and ^phnidius MacLeay (Java). In other respects it nearly approaches Stenolophus. Mr. Curtis thinks it not improbable that this genus may form the connecting link between Dromius, amongst the Brachinides, and the Scaritldes. There, however, ap- pears to me to be but little ground for such an opinion. I am in- debted to Professor Henslow for a specimen of this rare insect. M. Zimmerman has published a monograph on this genus in the second number of Gistl's Faunus. The genus Aepus Leach is united with Blemus by the French en- tomologists, notwithstanding its manifest differences. The fourth joint of the anterior tarsi of the males is armed with a strong spine ; a character not noticed in any other Carabideous insect. M. V. Au- douin has published a very interesting memoir upon the habits of this insect (^Nouv. Ann. du Mus. d' Hist. Nat. tom. iii., and Ann. des Sc. Nat.y 1835), which resides, in general, under pebbles, at a considerable distance below high-water mark, on the shores of the ocean, in situ- ations which are only exposed during very low tides. In this me- moir the author has endeavoured to account for the physical peculi- arities enabling the insect to sustain life in such a situation. Dr. Johnstone, to whom I am indebted for the insect, has discovered it G 4 88 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. in the same situations near Berwick-upon-Tweed. It has also been found on other parts of our coast. Division 3. The species of Mr. Stephen's genus Trimorphus (both of which are found near London) are nearly allied to Badister, with which they are united by the French authors. They are also appa- rently allied to Stenolophus ; indeed Mr. Curtis considers S. conspu- tus Steph. to be a Trimorphus. Their relationship with Domius ap- pears to be very slight. Mr. Stephens appears to have mistaken the yellow membranous unnotched clypeus for the labrum, which, upon dis- section, I find to be very minute and deeply notched. The terminal joint of the maxillary palpi is but little longer than the preceding, and, as well as the labial palpi, is terminated by an inflated membrane, which gives them the appearance of being obliquely truncate. The genera CJilcenius and Epomis are of great extent, being found in all quarters of the globe. They are elegant insects, having the upper surface of a silky green colour, bordered with a narrow yellow margin. Amongst the exotic genera of this subfamily the most remarkable are a genus for which I propose the name of Campylocnemis (Hyperion * Laporte), and having for its type the large Australian insect, Scarites SchrcEteri Screib., Linn. Trans, vol. iii., and which is placed by Laporte between Stomis and Poecillus. Having recently dissected this insect, I agree with M. Laporte in the propriety of its removal from the Scaritides, but regard it as more nearly allied to Omaseus and Cata- dromus. M. Brulle has regarded it as a subgenus of Moriof, but in the smaller size of the mentum (which in Morio occupies the entire of the under side of the front of the head and covers the maxillae) and the strongly toothed mandibles, it is quite unlike that genus. The French genus Gynandromorphus Dej. (Car. Etrusciis Sch. Sturm., D. F. tab. 93. c.) is remarkable for having the anterior tarsi in the females very much dilated, a character only observable in another Carabideous genus, Gynandropus, from North America. The interesting genus Catascopus of Kirby, Linn. Trans, vol. xiv., somewhat at first sight resembles a large Bembidium or Elaphrus, but its real affinity is considered by Mr. Kirby to be towards the Harpa- lides. It is regarded by some French authors as belonging to the * Mr. MacLeay has described another Carabideous genus in the Annulosa Java- nica, under the name of Hypharion. ■f An aberrant genus of the Scaritides, but possessing the dilated anterior tarsi ; so that it ought, probably, to be considered as belonging to the Harpalides. COLEOPTERA. CARABID^. 89 Brachlnides. The species are of brilliant colours, and are inhabitants of tlie tropics. The fourth subfamily Carabides (Grandipalpi or Abdominales Latr., Simpliclpedes Dej., Carabidoe 3IacLeay, Stephens) comprises the typical Carabideous insects {Jiff. 4. ll. Carabus nitens), being for the most part of a large size, and distinguished from all the other sub- families by having the anterior tibiae destitute of the strong notch near the extremity (Jiff. 4. 12. Carabus), although, in some of the terminal genera, an approach is made to the emarginate structure of the Harpalides by a slight oblique canal occupying the tip only of the tibia. The jaws are strong, with but very few teeth on the inner edge ; the antennae are long and setaceous, the second joint being the shortest ; the terminal joint of the palpi is often very lai'ge and securi- form (Jiff. 4. 14. maxilla of Cychrus) ; the eyes are large and promi- nent ; the abdomen and elytra often comparatively very large, the latter being rounded at the tips, and in the typical genera soldered together, the wings in such cases being obsolete ; the anterior tarsi are greatly dilated in the males. The larger insects of this family, Carabidea Westw. (Carabidae Stepfi.), are generally adorned with metallic and brilliant colours ; they run fast, are very carnivorous in their habits, and when irritated eject an exceedingly acrid and volatile fluid from the abdomen. The genera Elaphrus (Jiff. 4. 15. Elaphrus uliginosus), Pelophila, Blethisa, and Notiophilus, are formed by Mr. Stephens into a distinct family, named Elaphridae (Elaphridea Westw.) ; whilst the same genera, together with Nebria, Leistus (Jiff. 4. 16. maxilla of Leistus showing its curious spines), and others, are separated by Messrs. Audouin and Brulle under the name of Elaphrides. Amongst the British insects belonging to this subfamily several species of the genus C ychrus appeal to have been incorrectly re- corded as British. The only indigenous species, C. rostratus, as I am informed by Mr. Plimpton, makes a very loud noise when cap- tured by the friction of the tip of the abdomen against the elytra, a peculiarity not observed in any of the other species of the family. Its upper lip is represented at Jiff. 4. 13., and one of its maxillae exhibiting the curious internal palpi >3Xjiff. 4. 14. The genus Carabus, notwithstanding its modern restrictions, com- prises nearly two hundred species, varying considerably in form. 90 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. They are distinguished by their general large size, varying from three-fourths to one inch and a quarter in length. They appear to be confined to moderate climes, being seldom or never found nearer than 30° to the equator. It has been stated by M. Westermann (^Sil- berm. Rev. Ent. No. 3.) that no species of this genus exists in India. Mr. Hope has, however, described one, C. Wallichii, in his Synopsis of Nepaul Coleoptera {Gray, Zool. Mis. vol. i.). The Carabus monilis has been stated to reside in a chamber dug out in the earth of a garden, just sufficient to contain its body, and carefully smoothed and polished ; formed, as it would seem, not by digging out the earth and removing it, but by the insect pushing its body forcibly against the walls of its cell. I should conceive, however, that these cells were the situations in which the insects had undergone their transformations. This insect appears to be fond of celery trenches. Mr. Sheppard once observed a specimen running cautiously round a small luminous Centipede, which it evidently wished, but feared, to attack. M. Von Winthem noticed, at the meeting of German naturalists in 1830, the oc- currence of the larva of Tachina pacta, one of the parasitic Muscidae, in the bodies of Carabus gemmatus andviolaceus ; and Walch describes a curious emigrationof myriads of a species of Carabus, which he observed in the month of August {Naturf. *S'#.xi.). The greatest confusion ex- ists in the works of English entomologists relative to the specific names of many of the species of this genus, much of which might have been avoided had the original Linnaean specimens, preserved at the Lin- naean Society, been collated with British individuals of the different species. It will be sufficient to state, that the Carabus hortensis Linn, is not a British insect. The species of Calosoma are found upon trees, being furnished with ample wings, enabling them to obtain their necessary food, which consists of great numbers of the larvae of Lepidoptera, their larvae having also similar habits, as above detailed. The species of Nebria are for the most part inhabitants of the sea- coast ; whilst the Helobiae, which are united with the former by French authors, are inland species, some frequenting the highest mountains. I have taken the H. Gyllenhallii on the summits of Snowdon. The structure of the mouth of Pelophila so nearly resembles that of Nebria, whilst its general form is similar to Blethisa, that the propriety of uniting the Elaphridea with the Carabidea appears evident. The species of Elaphrus {/ig- -i. 15. El. uliginosus) and JVotio- COLEOPTERA. — CARABIDiE. 9t philus are of small size, and have the aspect of tlie Cicindelida;. They are found in damp situations, and on the margin of streams, &c. running with velocity in the sunshine. The former genus is dis- tinguished by the embossed spots on the elytra, and the latter by the brilliant smooth shining surface of their bodies. Mr. G. Waterhouse has published a monograph upon the latter in the Entom. Magazine, No. 2., in which he has described eighteen British species, some of which are not probably sufficiently distinct, Mr. Stephens having re- duced their number to six. Amongst the exotic genera are to be mentioned Procerus Blegerle, containing the largest species of the subflxmily, having the labrum entire, and the anterior male tarsi simple. The species are few in number, and generally of a rich purple colour, with the elytra very rugose. They inhabit the mountains of Turkey and adjacent countries. The rare African genus, Tefflus, is also of large size, and resembles the Carabi in form, but the labrum is entire, and the thorax suborbicular. It has been generally con- sidered allied to Procerus, but M. BruUe has removed it from the Carabides and placed it in his subdivision Panagiens, regarding it as more nearly allied to certain large exotic Panagaei. I have figured it in Griffith's Animal Kingdom, Insects, pi. 30. The interesting genus Omophron (^fig. 4. 10. O. limbatum), whose larva I have above described, is of a rounded convex form, thus approaching the Dyticidae ; the thorax is short and slightly lobed behind, covering the scutellum ; the basal joint of the male tarsi alone is dilated. The species are varied in their colours, with green and yellow ; they are of small size, not exceeding one-third of an inch in length, and are found upon the banks of streams. The relationship of this genus to the Water-beetles has been pointed out above ; but its true situation is evidently in this subfamily, which is confirmed by the similarity in its habits and the structure of its trophi with the Elaphridea and allied genera. The fifth subfamily Bembidiides (Subulipalpi Latr.) is distin- guished by the terminal joint of the maxillary and labial palpi being very minute and acute {Jig. 4. 18. 19. maxilla and labium of No- taphus). The anterior tibiae are always notched on the inside near the tip, and the insects are of small size, and generally ornamented with metallic tints {fig. 4. 17. Lopha 4-maculata). The typical genus, Bembidium Lair., is nearly alii d in general characters to the 92 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. Elaphri and Notiophili, whilst other groups approach Trechus, amongst the Harpalides; indeed, Latreille and other French authors have placed the last-named genus in this subfamily ; Brull^ even giving to it the name of Trechides, although it ought evidently to be termed Bembidiides, Bembidium being certainly the typical genus. The minute size of some of the aberrant Harpalides appears to prove the propriety of considering the Bembidiides as a distinct subfamily, Nature evidently, in the former insects, departing from one typical form towards another; thus, in some of the genera allied to Trechus, placed at the end of the Harpalides, are found the maxillary palpi, terminated by an acute conical joint, which, in the typical Bembidiides, is very minute and pointed, and the size of the insects reduced to that of the Bembidiides. This peculiar structure of the palpi and minuteness of size are again exhibited in the genera at the head of the Dyticidse ; and hence, as well as from the subaquatic habits of the present group, it has been considered that the Bembidiides and Ha- liplus formed the connecting links between the land and water pre- daceous beetles. Many of the species are well figured by Sturm in his Deutchslands Fauna. These insects are generally found upon the margins of streams, running about with great velocity, and burying themselves in crevices in the ground or under stones, &c. ; hence at the time of high floods in winter the floating refuse is crowded with them, at which time the col- lector will not fail to obtain a rich harvest. They prey upon other in- sects as well as upon dead animal matter ; thus Cillenum laterale, ac- cording to Mr. Haliday {Ent. Mag. vol. iv. p. 251.), is common under stones and tufts of sea weed on the Irish sea sands near low-water mark, and preys on Talitrus locusta, seizing it by the soft parts of the under side, and in this way being able singly to master game many times its own bulk. A great part of its existence is passed under the sea, and the mode in which it obtains the necessary supply of oxygen during its prolonged submersion is similar to that adopted by Aepus fulvescens. The fore legs of Cillenum are very strongly spined, and in addition to the ordinary structure, the notch of the tibiae is armed at its extremity with two spines at right angles below the notch, between which the end of the moveable spine at the basal angle of the notch is received, a structure evidently adapted to its mode of life. Tachypus Andreae, one of the most beautiful and rarest species, is often found feeding upon dead carrion on the coast of Ireland, as I am COLEOPTERA. — DYTICIDJE. 93 informed by Mr. Davis. Tlie species are comparatively numerous, but they require a more minute investigation into their specific cha- racters than has hitherto been given to them. The genera are for the most part established upon the form of the thorax, the majority being considered by late French authors as sections only of the genus Bembidium. The exotic genera do not offer material for particular observation. The second stirps of the predaceous beetles (Pentamera Adephaga) comprises those species which are aquatic in their various states, and are the HYDRADEPHAG A of il/acZm?/ (Hydrocanthari Latreille), con- sisting of the Linnaean genera Dytiscus (Dy ticus) and Gyrinus, in which the legs are formed for swimming, the two posterior pairs being flattened and fringed with hairs (^^. 5. 7.), the hind pair being placed at a con- siderable distance from the others, whereby a much greater impulse is given to the animal in its motions through the dense element of which it is an inhabitant. The body is oval, and generally depressed ; the head broad and immersed in the prothoracic cavity ; the mandibles short and strong, being nearly concealed by the upper lip ; the eyes but slightly prominent ; the inner lobe of the maxillae curved from the base, and not articulated at the tip. The thorax broader than long, and the tarsal claws often unequal in size. These insects swim with agility, occasionally rising to the surface for respiration, the feet at such times being held still and the body ascending, being specifically lighter than the water : in this situ- ation they rest obliquely, the extremity of the body being pro- truded out of the water, whereby the air is enabled to enter the large space beneath the elytra and reach the spiracles along the sides of the back. When captured they emit an extremely disagreeable odour, arising from a fluid which they discharge ; a white milky liquid is also often emitted. They occasionally fly during the night, at which times they are often attracted by a lighted candle. The larvae are long and narrow; those of the Gyrinidae are depressed, and those of the Dyticidae convex, being composed of eleven segments, exclusive of the head, which is large and armed with two strong sickle-shaped jaws, a pair of short antennge, four palpi, and six minute eyes on each side of the head ; the first segment is the largest, and corresponds with the pro- thorax of the perfect insect, and almost similar in texture to the re- 94? MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. mainder of the body. These larvae respire by tracheal branchiae, placed either at the anus or along the sides of the body, under the form of numerous small oar-like appendages. They quit the water previous to becoming pupae, and construct an oval cell, in which they pass the latter state a few inches beneath the surface of the borders of ponds, &c., in which they had resided whilst larvae. Mr. MacLeay has remarked that aquatic insects do not differ so much in form as terrestrial ; their numbers, as is especially the case in the present stirps, are also very considerably less, and consequently there are fewer genera amongst them, the exotic species being for the most part congeneous with our own, offering, as Latreille long ago remarked, " rien de remarquable ;" moreover the European species are equal in size to, and occasionally larger than, those of tropical regions, of which but few have been received by collectors belonging to the larger and more typical genera ; indeed M. Lacordaire states (^Ann. Sc. Nat., 1830.) that there are very few to be met with in Brazil. It is also a curious circumstance that, whilst the Dyticidae are so much inferior in point of numbers compared with the Carabidae, the Gyrinidae are still less numerous in comparison with the former of these families, Dejean enumerating 286 species of Dyticidae and only 37 of Gyrinidae. The colours of these aquatic insects are generally dark olive, black, or brown, variegated occasionally with metallic tints and with markings of a dirty ochreous hue. This stirps comprises only two families, which are very distinct from each other. MacLeay and Stephens, however, appear to regard the genus Haliplus (Hoplitus Clairv.) as the type of a third family, and which, from the small size of the insects and the structure of the ter- minal joints of the palpi, seems most nearly allied to the Bembidiides. Mr. Stephens, however, considers it to approximate rather towards the genus Omophron. Messrs. Kirby and Spence propose for these two families the names of Eunechina (swimmers), and Gyronechina, (swimmers in a circle), adding that the larvae of the latter are the most perfectly Chilopodomorphous, and those of the former the least so. They have also added some valuable observations upon the affinities of these and some other allied groups, which want of space alone compels me to omit. (Vide Introd. vol. iv. p. 394.) Adopting the ordinary plan the two families will receive the names of — 1st, DyticidjE (Diving-beetles); anterior legs short, antennae long. 2d, GyRiNiDiE (Whirl-wigs) ; anterior legs long, antennae short. COLEOPTERA. DYTICIDiE. 95 The first family DYXiciDiE * Leach (Eunechina K. and »S'.) corre- sponding with the Linnaean genus Dytiscusf , is distinguished from the other famihes of Water-beetles by the antenna?, which are long and slender J (^fig. 5. i. Acilius sulcatus, divided down the centre by a line to show the peculiarities of the sexes), and by the articulated Fi