JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF BENGAL. OO Le Ee PART II. (NATURAL HIstTory, &c.) (Nos. I & II.—1901.) EDITED BY THE _ Naturar fiistory Secrerary. “Tt will flourish, if naturalists, chemists, antiquaries, philologers, and men of science in different parts of Asia, will commit their observations to writing and send them to the Asiatic Society at Calcutta. It will languish, if sach communications shall be long intermitted ; and it will die away, if they shall entirely cease.’’ Sir Wo. JONES. OOOO sy ey CALCUTTA : y A YQ PRINTED AT THE BAPTIST MISSION PRESS, «J AND PUBLISHED BY THE ASIATIC SOCIETY, 57, PARK STRUEYT. 1902. he ‘es rh. wy veils PP ee a Ue Ae Ue a? tr Hi - a Pre a 5 ar ‘< +" Ua duis 5th, ms i yerear ey, of Gens. yas ire ait oa en ne ne, - 7 \ / it y\ o \ ( ' - Dates of Issue. Part II, 1901. pre ate Sean, aN + * nay ae coh Ses ave ne aI — — Sa . , on ¥ LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS. Kine, Grorer ;—Waterials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula Mann, Harotp H.;—Studies in the Chemistry and Physio- logy of the Tea Leaf. Part I. The Knzymes of the Tea Meafe 2S 33 a as Manners-SMITH, i) ;—Wolf Tine im Gilgit McManon, A. H. ;—Woftes on the Fauna of Chitral ... ;—Notes on the Fauna of Dir and Swat Nicévitte, Lionet Dr ;—Nofes on the Butterflies ee in the subgenus Tronga of the genus Kupleea i NorsE, C. G. ;—New species of Indian Hemeieaecn Pray, D.;—Novicie Indice XVIII. The Asiatic se ¢ Dalbergia... Me ave aes s Se Seeannanieneeiaee Seep i? a4 bye. eke tS bs Ane Lard t nt mo ets Bat yr te Ny ie ; any Me VF hy by ty ~ ' fi “a ; . i 1) yell Ne Bee ME Clee BEL YOM a NT Vle! APU A tae PIN a oe ey |) ee ye Ae) 2 7 / ARP ry *) bit gly AE BALE LAg be vie Me “| i” . C bi Pas sae Bm ey ay HET RS N e yet _ i mt A: Var , i *) NOTICE. The map illustrating Captain Leonard Rogers’ article, page 457, Part II, Vol. LXIX, 1900, is issued herewith, and should be bound up in its proper place. (Hd.) California Academy of Sciences ——— eet Presented byASiatic Society of Bengal. ees Bf tog. essnoine 10 qmabeoh, 3 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF BENGAL, me of me - Vol. LXX. Part II.—NATURAL SCIENCE. lie a No. I.—1901. —e™ I.—Notes on the Fauna of Chitral.—By Cart. A. H. McManoy, C.S.1, C.L.E., F.Z.8., Political Agent, Dir, Swat, and Chitral. [ Received 8th February; Read 6th March, 1901.] As in the case of “ Notes on the Fauna of the Gilgit District” (Journal, Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. Ixviii, part 2, no. 2, pp. 105-109, 1899), I propose to place on record the results of such observations as I have been able to make in the matter of Zoology during my official connection during 1899-1900-1901 with the Chitral country. I know of no previous records having been made of the Fauna of this country. Any record of the existence or non-existence of animals in it will therefore be of use in adding to general knowledge regarding the geographical distribution of the various forms of animal life, As will be seen, my notes are lamentably scanty. They are based on personal observations made during three visits to Chitral, and on the information kindly given to me by Capt. B. EH. M. Gurdon, C.1.E., D.S.O., Assistant Political Agent in Chitral, Major G. A. J. Leslie, R.E., and other military officers stationed in Chitral. Such as they are, I place these notes on record in the hope that they may be of interest, and form the modest beginning of a more complete and comprehensive record. The country of Chitral is similar in most respects to the adjacent Hindu Kush region of Gilgit. Geographically it may be defined as the Jou. 1 2 A. H. McMahon—Notes on Fauna of Chitral. [No. 1, drainage area of the Chitral river and its numerous affluents as far south as the junction of the Arnawai river with the main stream. Like Gilgit, it forms one of the most lofty tracts of country on the surface of our globe. From the high glacier-bound valleys which take their rise from Tirich Mir, 25,500 ft. and other lofty mountain peaks, the elevation of the country decreases until as one descends the valleys, the land of snow and glaciers is exchanged for barren hill sides, of rocky cliffs and debris: Passing through the fringe of forest line, one de- scends to the fertile alluvial plateaux of prehistoric river-beds through which the present streams now run in deep narrow gorges. The lowest elevation, 7.e., of about 4,000 ft., is reached at the point where the Chitral river leaves the Chitral district and thence onwards under the name of the Kunar river flows through Asmar to join the Cabul river. The northern and eastern portions of Chitral are very similar in character to the Gilgit country, and the conditions of life being the same, the fauna is, as one would expect, much the same in both countries. Further south and west however the rainfall is greater, and the hill sides are consequently more covered with forest and vegetation than those of the Gilgit District.* This naturally tends to an increase in the ~ number and variety of the fauna, and we find pheasants, monkeys, jungle fowl, and leopard (Felis pardus)}+ which are not to be found elsewhere in Chitral or Gilgit. Iam told that the green parrot (I presume Palzornis torquatus) is to be found at the lower end of the Chitral valley. They doubtless come up from the warmer climes of the Jalalabad and Kunar valley. The neighbouring country on the west, Kafiristan, is very thickly wooded, and from all accounts appears to be particularly rich in fauna of all kinds. Zoological research in Kafiristan would doubtless give most valuable and interesting results. It is to be regretted that such research is at present out of the question. I proceed now to note on a few species of the Chitral Fauna. MammattaA.—The most numerous of the larger mammals in Chitral are Ibex, Markhor and Oorial. Ibea.—(Capra sibirica). These abound on or above the snow-line throughout the higher and more elevated portions of the Chitral country and in the upper portions of all the valleys which join the Chitral valley above Chitral itself. They are not as far as I know to be found in any valley below Chitral. * Somewhat similar conditions with corresponding results as to. fauna prevail “in the-Chilas tract on the S.-E. corner of the Gilgit District. , As opposed to the snow. leop: rd (Felis wneia). 1901.] A. H. McMahou—Noles ow Fwuna of Chitral. 3 They are identical with the ibex of the Gilgit District, but for some reason or other, the average length of the horns is slightly less than of those of the Gilgit ibex. Horns of over 40 inches in length are fewer than in Gilgit, and the largést head obtained is I think not over 45 inches, The rutting season begins about the ist of February and continues for upwards of a month, but in the case of the older males only half that time, The young are born in July at an average elevation of 14,000 feet, generally, it is said, in the same nullahs as rutting took place. The females retire into very difficult and inaccessible ground before giving birth. _ | Markhor.—(Capra falconeri). These are very numerous in ee lower valleys in Chitral. They are of the Pir Panjal variety (vide fic. 165 of Blanford’s Fauna of India. Vol. Mammalia), z.e., with horns handsomely curved, but without the wide exaggerated curve and spread of the variety known as the Astor. [I may note here that the Astor variety is only to be found in the few valleys which join the Indus river on the left bank between Bunjiand Chilas, All the markhor elsewhere in the Gilgit District are of the Pir Panjal variety ]. A few heads somewhat resembling the Cabul variety ee = of Blanford’s Fauna of India) are also to be found in Chitral. | The northern limits of markhor in Chitral appear to be:—in. éidken Lutkho valley at a point half-way between Drusp and Shogot; in the Chitral main valley and valleys joining it on the left bank, at Mori (about 10 miles above Chitral). The southern limits of the Chitral (z.e., Pir Panjal variety) are said to be :—on the right bank of the Kunar river at Chighar Serai, and on the left bank at Nari (Narsat),. The largest head as yet obtained in the Chitral District measures 06 inches in length of horn. Horns over 50 inches are very rare. In Chitral the rutting season begins about the first week of December, and in Gilgit in about the second or third week of that month. It continues for about a month, but in the case of the older males only about a fortnight. The young in Chitral are born early in June, almost invariably, it is said, in the same nullahs where the parents were during the rutting season. The males leave these nullahs for cooler climes about May. The females retire into -the highest. and most difficult ground they can find in the nullah before - giving birth. — Oorial.—-( Ovis vigner).—These are plentiful in the Chitral ealiless from Reshan downwards. They are of the Ladak variety, known as. shapu: (Ovis cycloceros), and differ from the proper oorial of the Punjab, Afghanistan, Sind and Beluchistan (Ovis viynet) in having no white ruff 4 A. H. McMahon—Notes on Fauna of Chitral. [No. 1, below the neck but only a white tuft in the black beard on the breast, and in having shorter but more massive horns. The horns seldom exceed 30 inches in length. Any over 32 inches are practically unknown. _ The horns however reach a circumference of from 10 to 12 inches round the base, whereas the oorial seldom exceeds 10 inches. In naming the Chitral animal oorial (Ovis vignei) as above I have followed the nomenclature of Dr. Blanford (Fauna of India) who includes both the shapu (Ovis cycloceros) and oorial (Ovis vignei) under that head. Their northern limits in Chitral are practically the same as those of the markhor. Their rutting season begins about the 15th of November and continues about a month. The young are born at an average elevation of 9,000 feet. Of large mammals the following are also common in Chitral. Leopard.—(Felis pardus). This, the common Indian leopard, is numerous in the lower portions of the Chitral district. It is not to be found in Gilgit. Snow Leopard.—(Filis uncia). Common in all the higher portions of the country. Bears.—Unlike Gilgit, where the black bear (Ursus torquatus) is very rare, in Chitral it is very common, and abounds in the Chitral main valley and side valleys as far north as Reshan. Brown bears (Ursus arctus) only occur in the Chitral country at the head of the Turikho and Yarkhun valleys. Its scarcity in Chitral is a contrast to its abundance in most parts of the Gilgit district. Marmots—The red or long-tailed Marmot (Arctomys caudatus) with its shrill whistle-like call, is to be found in large numbers at the head of the Ayun nullah, and at the head of the Yarkhun and Baroghil valleys. It does not appear to have been seen elsewhere. [With reference to Marmots I might note here that since suggest- ing in my notes on the Fauna of Gilgit, that the Thibet, Himalayan, and Long-tailed Marmots ( Arctomys himalayanus—hodgsont, and caudatus), might prove to be all one and the same species, I have been informed by Dr. Blanford that the A. himalayanus and A. caudatus are distinctly different forms as shown by the structure of their skulls. | Musk deer.—(Moschus moschiferus) is to be found in the Shishi Koh valley, and is said to be fairly common on the mountains dividing Chitral from Dir. Monkeys are to be found in the lower end of the Chitral valley. They go about in herds.* I cannot say what species they belong to. * Capt. Gurdon saw a herd of them at Mirkandi on the bank of the Chitral river only 4,000 ft, above sea-level. 1901.] A. H. McMahon—Notes on Fauna of Chitral. 5 The general characteristics seem to be those of Macacus rhesus, but all the specimens I have seen have, instead of a tapering tail, a tail of about 8 inches in length coming to an abrupt end as if it had been cut off like a fox terrier’s. I am endeavouring to obtain a specimen to send down to the Indian Museum, Calcutta, for identification. The existence of monkeys in Chitral, and also as will be noted elses where in Dir and Swat, is remarkable, as I do not know of their ever having been reported so far west. Wolves, jackals, hyznas, lynxes, pig and foxes are to be found in Chitral as in Gilgit. As regards smaller mammals, I have been unable to make personal observations. Reptilia and Batrachia.—As regards these I regret having been unable to make observations. As in Gilgit, these families are but sparsely represented. Snakes are few, and the only specimen I have been myself able to obtain was one of Zamenis ventrimaculatus. Birds.—Owing to its larger extent of wooded tracts, birds, especially of the smaller kinds, appear even more plentiful in the winter months in Chitral than in Gilgit. I have been unable to study them, and will content myself with a brief note of such kinds as have come to my notice. Tetraogallus himalayensis—The Himalayan snow-cock known as the Ram Chickor is very plentiful on the higher slopes of all the Chitral valleys, as is the case also in Gilgit. Chickor.—Caccabis chucar is also very common in the lower valleys. Hawking these birds with various kinds of hawks is the principal form of sport indulged in by Chitralis. Note.—I have never heard of either the grey or black partridge, Francolinus pondicerianus or vulgaris, being found anywhere in Chitral. Pheasants.—The Rohtas pheasant exists in the nullahs below Drosh, but I am unable to say whether it is the ordinary Pucrasia macrolopha or the species named Pwerasia castanea which ‘is only known” (vide Blanford’s Fauna of India Birds, vol. iv.) ‘‘ by two skins said to have ““come from Kafiristan. In these the neck all round, upper back, breast, *‘ and flanks are chestnut, and the middle of the abdomen black.” Iam endeavouring to obtain specimens, in order to elucidate this point. The Monal pheasant, Lophophorus refulgens, is plentiful in the wooded valleys of lower Chitral. No Kalij pheasants have as yet been met with in Chitral. Jungle Fowl—Capt. Gurdon informs me that he has often heard what he thinks must be jungle-fowl in the lower Chitral valleys. He says they crow just like a domestic cock. Unfortunately he has never obtained any specimens. 6 A, H. McMahon—Noles on Fauna of Chitral. [No. 1; ~ Mynas (the common Acridotheres tristis ?) ‘are very plentiful in lower Chitral. Hagles, Hawks and’ Vultures of various kinds are, as might be expected in such a mountainous eopmbnys vey comnion in the winter months. Chitral is famed for its Goshawks Anbar palumbarius) which are caught in large numbers every winter, or more correctly speaking at the commencement of each winter, as they pass over the country on their way to India. As many as 60 birds were caught in the winter of 1899. T‘he method adopted is as follows ; an open space of level ground, as high up a mountain side as possible, is selected. In the middle of this a hole large enough for a man to sit in is made, and then roofed over flush with the ground leaving a small concealed entrance at the side for entrance and exit. In the centre of the roof is a small hole through which a tame chickor is put out to walk about on the roof, attached by its leg to a string held by the man inside the chamber. The passing goshawk attracted by the chickor swoops down and seizes it, where- upon it is caught by the legs and pulled down by the man into the chamber below. ‘These goshawks in travelling over Chitral fly very high, and in fine clear weather fly too high to be attracted by this method. It is in threatening, cloudy weather when they fly lower tliat: captures are made. The females are by far the most valued, and all those caught are, by time-honoured custom, the property of the Mehtar, to whom they have to be presented. They are sometimes returned’ tor the captor, but more frequently a suitable present is given in return. The Chitralis are famed for their skill in training hawks. A passage goshawk has been known to be flown with success at game within 5 days) of its capture. A female goshawk flown at game, after a male bird has been released, will make straight for the male and kill it. Pisces.—The fishes of Chitral have never been studied. The rivers contain fish in considerable numbers, though none reach any great size. A fish of 5 lbs. is said to have been caught in the: lower Chitral river, but few reach 3 lbs. The majority appear to be of the kind known commonly as “ Snow Trout,” and is I presume a species of Cyprinine. A’ species of catfish (Siluroid) is also ‘s be found in the lower waters of the Chitral River. The Mahaseer, Barbus tor, is unknown in Chitral. Lepidoptera.— The eet te of Chitral include many rare eit interesting kinds.. Major G. A. Leslie, R.E , and Lt. W. H. Evans, R.E., are now engaged in making: a cotladiion W hich i is likely to prove of great value.. 1901.) A. H. MeMahon—Notes on Fauna of Dir and Swat. 7 I have recorded these notes with some diffidence. The zoological records of a country if they are to exist at all must have a beginning, even though that beginning be a modest one. Chitral offers an interest- ing field for zoological research, and it will be seen from. the above notes how little has as yet been done in this direction. est The existence of monkeys, marmots, musk deer, shapu, Himalayan snow cock, and (I think we may add) jungle- fowl i in Chitral is interest- ing, as no record appears to have heen as yet made of these animals so far West. - ~_————eon-- vnrnreeeweeeeeeEOeeeeereesee > nh eee eee II.—Notes on the Fauna of Dir and: Swat.—By Carrain A. H. McManox, CSI, C.LE, F:Z.8. Political Agent, Dir, Swat and Chitral. [Received 8th February ; Read 6th March, 1901.] © ! On previous occasions I have, in the case or the Gilgit Fit Chitral Districts, placed on record a few notes on the Fauna of those countries, in the hope that though scanty in themselves they might be of interest in adding to our existing knowledge of the distribution | of various forms of animal life. I propose here to do the same with Sone ‘3 the country of Dir and Swat, and to record such few observations on the Zoology of these countries as circumstances have allowed me to make during my stay (1899, 1900, 1901), in the Dir, Swat, and Chitral agency. Nothing as far as I know has ever been recorded in the matter of Zoology regarding these countries before. My notes therefore must be taken as a modest endeavour to make a commencement of the complete Zoological records which it is to be hoped will be made of these countries hereafter by more capable hands. Inability to move freely about this unsettled country and press of work have prevented my observations being of anything like an exten-. sive nature. The greater portion of the country is as yet unvisited by Huropeans, and a wide field of interesting zoological research remains antouched. ~The countries of Dir and Swat. are treated here as one. They represent the drainage areas of the Panjkora and Swat rivers respec- tively as far as their junction. Both rivers take their rise within a _ short distance of each other in the lofty mountain range which forms tlie southern boundary of Chitral, The peaks of this range vary in height, decreasing from some 23,000 ft. on the N. -E, end to 15 ,000. ft, or so on the 8: -W. ond of the range, © 8 A. H, McMahon—WNotes on Fauna of Dir and Swat. _[No. 1, ‘ The upper portions of the head valleys of both the Swat and Panjkora rivers resemble in most respects the valleys which on the north side of the range form part of Chitral. It is to be expected therefore that their fauna much resemble that of corresponding tracts in Chitral. The remainder and the greater part of the Dir and Swat countries are at a much lower elevation than that of Chitral. Both are mount- ainous, but each successive mountain range, as one proceeds south- wards, becomes lower and lower, untilat the southern edge of the coun- try the highest peaks attain to no more than 6,000 ft., while the main valleys gradually descend to an elevation of only: some 2,000 ft. Both the upper and lower portions of the Dir and Swat countries differ in one respect from Chitral, in that the annual rainfall is very much greater. This has resulted in clothing the hill sides of the upper valleys with wide deodar forests, and in thickly covering the lower slopes with pine, oak and other small trees. The lower valleys are wide expanses of alluvial land of great fertility. As might be expected, the fauna of the country is very rich and ‘varied. How little we yet know of it will be seen by the scantiness of these notes. Mammalia.—On the northern fringe of Swat where the water- shed of the Swat river is also the watershed of some of the upper Chitral valleys, the ibex (Capra sibirica) is reported. These I think are only visitors from the Chitral side. Ibex is not found in Upper Dir. Markhor.—(Capra falconeri). A few of the Pir Punjab variety with: gracefully curved horns (Fig. 165 of Blanford’s Fauna of India, Vol. Mammalia) are to be found on the range which separates Dir from Chitral, and Asmar. I do not know if any exist in Upper Swat or Swat Kohistan, but one might expect to find them there. — Further south in the range of hills which separate Swat from Boner and the Peshawar plain, the Cabul variety with almost straight horns and a slight spiral are found. Oorial.—Ovis vignet exist but in small numbers in the Southern borders of Swat. ‘They are of the Punjab variety, Ovis vignei proper, and I have not heard of the existence in Dir and Swat of the Ovis cycloceros or Shapu variety. It is doubtless to be found however in Swat Kohistan which lies between Chitral and Chilas both possessing this variety. Goral.— Cervus goral has been seen in the Lower Swat valley, hea one was caught alive while being swept down the Swat river ina flood, and also on the hills above Malakand. The existence of this eee es ee —— a oe ee 1901.] A. H. McMahon—Notes on Fauna of Dir and. Swat. or) animal is interesting, as it does not appear ever to have been before reported west of the Indus. Musk Deer.—Moschus moschiferus is reported to be numerous 1n n the upper portions of Dir. Bears—The Brown Bear, Ursus arctus, has never been reported in Dir or Swat. The Black bear, Ursus torquatus, is very common all over Dir iid Swat, even as far sunt as the range separating Swat from the Peshawar valley. Leopards.—The existence of snow leopard (Felis wncia) has never been reported, but I feel sure it is to be found in Swat Kohistan. The common leopard, Felis pardus, is very plentiful throughout Dir and Swat. Monkeys.—It is somewhat surprising to find that monkeys are fairly common throughout most parts of Dir and Swat. I have seen several live specimens that have been brought in from Dir, and a large herd of monkeys has been lately seen on the slopes of the Bar Chanrai hill on the north side of the Lower Swat valley opposite Malakand. I have been unable to satisfy myself about the identity of this monkey. It appears to be of the same kind as specimens which I have seen in Chitral. I have only seen live specimens of animals of both countries. These strongly resented the close examination which is necessary for identification. In general characteristics they would appear to resemble either Macacus rhesus or Macacus assamensis, but their tails, which in adults are about 8inches in length, are not tapering but come to an abrupt end as though cut off, like a fox terrier’s tail. I hope to be able to send a specimen of this monkey to the Indian Museum, Calentta, for classification. | I should note that the existence of monkeys has been also eehoriod to me as having been met by officers while out after markhor in = Pajja hill north of Mardan. . Among other common mammals in Lower Dir and Swat are the hyena, jackal, fox, wolf, pig, hare, porcupine (Hystriv lewcura) and hedgehog. Reptilia or Batrachia.—Regarding these my observations have been confined to the immediate. neighbourhood . of Malakand and the Lower Swat valley between Chakdara and Malakand. Both snakes and lizards are numerous in the above area, but I have devoted my attention chiefly to the former, of which I have examined a large number of specimens. | | a | Ophidia.—Though snakes are numerous, they seem all to belong to but very few species. By far the commonest genus of snake in this J. 2. | aol 10 A, H. McMahon—Notes on Fauna of Dir and Swat. [No. ], tract appears to be the Zamenis which is therein represented by the following species. Zamenis diadema.— This is very common, and the specimens obtained average between 5 to 6 ft. in length. One specimen killed had just swallowed a large rat. The peculiarity about most specimens is the bright red colour of their heads. I have noticed this elsewhere on the N.-W. frontier. Zamenis mucosus.——Also common. Several very large specimens were sent me from Mardan. This snake, both in Mardan and here, is very dark coloured, and curiously resembles the black form of cobra. I have been more than once taken in by this resemblance, It is very common in the Guides’ grass farm at Mardan, where it is the terror of the grass cutters. It adds to its similarity to a cobra by inflating out its neck into some resemblance to a cobra’s hood—and assuming a most threatening aspect. Zamenis ladacensis—Very common. I also obtained specimens of this snake with a bright vermilion line down the centre of its back. I understand that this variety used to be considered a separate one under the name Zamenis rhodorachis. This peculiar and very con- spicuous colouring would almost appear to entitle it to retain a separate name. Zamenis ventrimaculatus.—Not so common as tlie preceding species. Next to the Zamenis comes in point of numbers of specimens obtained, the Hchis carinatus, which is plentiful everywhere. It is possible that it isin reality far more numerous than the Zamenis, but escapes detection by its protective colouring and smaller size. This is the only species of the Viperids that has come to my notice in this country. Naja tripudians—I have only obtained a few specimens of the cobra in this country. It does not appear to be numerous. Those obtained have all been of the black var lety. Bungarus cseruleus.—Only one specimen of the karait obtained, and that in Malakand itself. Tropidonotus piscator.—Common in the Swat valley ; one large speci- men was found to have 18 large developed eggs inside it. Tropidonatus stolatus.—One specimen. I have subsequently obtained another specimen, which I sent alive to the Indian Museum, where I called Major Alcock’s attention to its colouring. The vivid light yellow colour of the centre portion of each cross band down the length of its back has not been brought to notice before. Liycodon striatus.x—One specimen which I sent to the Indian Museum, Calcutta, where it was identified by Major Alcock. 1901. ] A. H. McMahon—Notes on Fauna of Dir and Swat. ll Gongylophis conicus.—I obtained several specimens of this curious snake. Contia angusticeps.—This snake deserves some remark. I obtained eleven specimens of it at Malakand and was unable to identify it. Major Alcock, Superintendent, Indian Museum, Calcutta, to whom I sent speci- mens, was also.unable to identify it with any known species, and it was sent to the British Natural History Museum, where Mr. Boulenger has identified it as the above, 7.e., Contia angusticeps, of which ony one specimen appears to have been previously found. _ Ophidia.—Continued. Oligodon swbgriseus.—One specimen. Typhlops braminus.—Two specimens, which I sent alive to the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Glauconia blanfordii.—I obtained one specimen, which I sent alive to the Indian Museum, Calcutta. It unfortunately escaped before being definitely identified. Major Alcock says he thinks it was the above species. Lacertilia. —Notwithstanding the number of Lizards in the coun- try, l regret having been unable to devote attention to them. The only specimens examined by me, have been as follows ;— Varanus flavescens.—This is very common and attains a length of about 3 feet. Varanus bengalensis.—Common. Gymnodactylus scaber. One specimen identified as above by Major Alcock. Calotes versicolor. Eublepharis macularius.—One specimen identified by Major Alcock. The colouring of this specimen in life deserves notice, The transverse bands were jet black and bright yellow with a faint subshade of pink. Birps.—The Dir and Swat countries are rich in varied and numerous kinds of birds, both visitors and permanent residents. A careful study of them would doubtless prove of great interest. Among the few specimens examined by me are the following. Rallus aquaticus 29 .—Water Rail. Differs from the type given in Fauna of India (Birds, Vol. IV), in having the ashy-grey of the breast slightly (though very slightly) washed with brown. Its length is 12 inches, instead of 11 inches as in the type. Otis tetraz.—Little Bustard. ‘Two specimens obtained in winter between Malakand and Mardan. Cygnus olor.—Mute Swan. One live but wounded specimen brought in March, 1900, by a man who said he had shot it with three others at the mouth of the Swat river at Abazai. 12 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, - Lophophorus refulgens.—The Monal Pheasant is fairly common in the higher and wooded slopes of all the Dir and Swat valleys. It appears to suffer from snow blindness, and is easily caught at such times. Several live specimens have been brought to me from Dir, and one from near Thana in Lower Swat. Circus cyaneus.—Hen Harrier. One specimen obtained from tia edge of the Peshawar plain, November, 1900. Duck and teal of many kinds pass through Swat and Dir on their way to and from India in the autumn and spring. Quail and snipe also pass through. I have never heard of Sand Grouse having been seen. The Chickor and Scarse are permanent residents and very common. So'also are the Grey and Black Partridges. The Black Partridge only frequent the lower ends of the valleys. The Grey extend further up the valleys. | ' Pisces. —The Panjkora and Swat rivers are full of fish, chiefly of the kind commonly known as Snow Trout, which would appear to wit a species of Cyprinine. Mahaseéer (Barbus tor) ascend both rivers in considerable naidhigate in the spring, but very few remain during the winter, as they nearly all descend again to the Cabul river in the late autumn. Mahaseer up to 30 Ibs. have been obtained in the lower reaches of the Panjkora and Swat rivers. III.—Note. on. the Butterflies comprised in the subgenus Tronga of the genus Kuploea.—By Lionet ve Nicktyi111, F.E.S., C.M.Z.S8., &e. '[ Received March 15th; Read April 3rd, 1901. ] -° In the Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1892, pp. 158- 161, will be found a note by me on the Indian and Malayan Peninsula Butterflies of the subgenus Stictoplea of the genus Huplea. In the Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1892, pp. 247-248, is practically a reswmé of this paper. In the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 1xi, pt. 2, pp. 287-245 (1892), I gave a note on the subgenus Pademma of the genus Huplea. In the present paper I propose to deal with the subgenus Tronga of the genus Huplea. Iam driven to do so by the circumstance that Mr. Robert Shelford, Curator of the Sarawak Museum, Borneo, has from time to time sent me large numbers of Trongas, imploring me to name them for him, as he is unable to do so from Dr. F. Moore’s paper on the Hupleina in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London for 1883, pp. 253-324, in which six 1901. ] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 13 species of the subgenus from Borneo are given as distinct, and from the other literature at his disposal. I was no more successful. than Mr. Shelford, and as in Calcutta I am shut off from access to the type speci- mens of all the described species, [ despatched twenty-two male Ton. gas from Sarawak to Dr. Moore, who has been so kind as to set them all, and to return them to me. Under the date 7th October, 1900, he writes to me:—‘‘I have compared your twenty-two male Trongas with the types available, and have put the name to a specimen agreeing exactly with the types of 7’. crameri, Lucas, T. brooke, Moore, and 1’. labwana, Moore. I have also enclosed a pencil sketch of the types of 1’. mooret, Butler, and T. pryeri, Moore, to which none of yours agree, The types of all these are now in the British Museum. The other unlabelled specimens of Tronga returned you will easily be able to match with the verified specimens. I lave not been able to examine them with 7. duatensis, Moore, as I have no opportunity now of com- paring them with the type. I hope these will enable you to satisfy yourself as to their specific value or otherwise.” I would have been still more grateful to Dr. Moore for his kindness than I am had he been so good as to have given me his opinion as to the names by which ‘the nineteen specimens he returncd unnamed should be known. In this and similar cases it is not difficult to pick out and name extreme individual forms of a variable species, but it is the inter- mediate specimens that puzzle one. However, with three named species, drawings of two others, and the description of the sixth it is not difficult to deal with the species of Tronga found on the north- ern side of Borneo. I may note that the Island of Daat, from whence 1’. daatensis was described, is quite close to the much larger island of Labuan on the North-West coast of Borneo ; both these islands lie ver 4 near to the coast, and are therefore not Hikely to possess any species peculiar to them, especially Hupleas, which are well known to have very tough constitutions and to take long and voluntary journeys. On this subject Mr. W. P. Pryer in Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist., fifth series, vol. xix, p. 48, n. 16 (1887) has some very interesting notes on the migrations of Hupleas in North Borneo. Dr. Moore in Proc. Zool. Soe. Lond., 1883, gives twelve Species of Tronga,-from the Nicobar Isles, Lower Burma, the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Nias, Borneo, and China. The latter habitat is most vague, as China is a vast country. In ‘“ Lepidoptera Indica,” vol. i, pp. 76-80 (1890), Dr. Moore retains twelve species in the genus, out of which he describes as new T. nicevillet from the Sunderbunds near Calentta, and T. heylertsii from Sumatra, but he sinks his 2’. olivacea, Moore, as a’ synonym of T. bremeri, Felder, and omits all reference to 7. kinbergi, 14 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, Wallengren, from China, the total number therefore remaining the same as in 1883. In 1896, Mr. H. Fruhstorfer recorded HL. (Tronga) kinbergi, Wallengren, from the Tengger mountains, 2,000 feet, Hast Java. In 1898, Mr. Fruhstorfer described Tronga crameri tenggerensis, new sub- species, from the same place. In 1896, Dr. B, Hagen described and figured an Reales pagenstecheri from Bawean Island, which hes midway between Borneo and Java. The describer says it comes into Moore’s genus Menama, which has in the male an androconal patch of shining black scales on the upperside of the hindwing behind the subcostal nervure towards the base of the wing (not mentioned by Dr. Moore), this character being absent from the genus Tonga. Dr. Hagen says it is allied to ZH. lorze, Boisduval (a MS. name only, the species should be credited to Dr. Moore, who first described it). . Mr. Fruhstorfer, however, makes it a local race of T'ronga crameri, Lucas. From the figure I should say that it is a Menama rather than a Tronga, but it is impossible to be certain without seeing a male specimen. In 1898, Dr. Hagen described Huplea (Tronga) mentawica and E. (T.) morvisi, from the Mentawej Islands, which lie to the south of the centre of the island of Sumatra. In 1898, Mr. F. Fruhstorfer gave a list of the butterflies of the genus Tronga, and described Tronga crameri tenggerensis from the Tengger mountains, Hast Java, 2,000 feet, and Tronga crameri, ab. biseriata, from East Java, It is not known to me if Mr. Fruhstorfer considered in 1898 that his H. tenggerensis is the same species as the E. kinbergi, Walleugren, he recorded in 1896 from the same spot. As noted above, the latter was originally described from China. But he remarks that the specimen in question appears to him to be a form of the very variable female of Huplea (Isamia) rafflest, Moore, described from Java. He goes on to say that “In the British Museum JL. kinbergi is - apparently by mistake labelled as coming from China,’”’ although it was originally described from thence. In the same paper Mr. Fruhstorfer notes that Huplea (Tronga) brooket, Moore, from Borneo is identical with Huplea (Menama) lorzxe, Moore, also from Borneo. This is wholly wrong, the two species are absolutely distinct, and Dr. Moore has correctly placed them in his genera Tronga and Menama respectively, although he has omitted to describe the satiny shining black patch of androconia on the upperside of the hindwing of the male by which Menama can in that sex be at once distinguished from males of Tronga, which lack this patch. Mr. Fruhstorfer further notes that it is impossible to establish the genus Menama [as distinct from Tonga], 1901. ] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 15 inasmuch as in Borneo as well as in Sumatra there are “double” forms of T’ronga and Menama. He says that he possesses, for example, specimens of T'ronga niasica, Moore, from Nias Island with rounded forewings and others with angled forewings. That is quite probable, most likely in addition to Tronga niasica there is an undescribed species of Menama from that island, which I have not seen, though I have many males of 7’. niasica. Mr. Fruhstorfer also notes that the H. (Tronga) crameri of Lucas which I recorded from Bali seems to belong to H. cramert tenggerensis, Fruhstorfer. This is not absolutely the case, as my single specimen from that island does not agree entirely with Mr. Fruhstorfer’s new subspecies, as it has fewer and smaller spots on the forewing, so is not typical, and is certainly in my opinion not a species distinct from H. cramert. In the genus Huplea I do not con- sider as a rule an extra spot or two, or even a whole series of spots, of any specific value whatever; the maculation in Hupleas is in nearly every species a most variable character. Lastly Mr. Fruhstorfer notes that it is curious that no species of Zronga has been found in the island of Palawan in the Philippines, but that in the other parts of the Malayan region there are two distinctly marked species of Tronga which may be classified according to the following scheme :— A. Hindwing with a prominent row of submarginal dots :—under which be places (1) J. cramert, Lucas, (2) 7. crameri brooket, Moore, (3) T. crameri marsdeni, Moore, (4) UT’. cramert bremert, Felder, (5) 1’. cramert mooret, Butler [incorrect, as this is a Menama, not a Tronga}, (6) T. cramert pagenstechert, Hagen, (7) YZ. cramert tenggerensis, Fruhstorfer, and ab. bisertata, Fruhstorfer, (8) TT. cramert biseriata, Moore, and (9) 7. crameri morrisi, Hagen. He notes that T’. daatensis, Moore, 7’. labuana, Moore, T’. johanna, Kirby, and T’. olivacea, Moore, all fall to T. cramert, Lucas. As regards 1’. olivacea this is incorrect from even Mr. Fruhstorfer’s views of the genus Tronga, as that species is, according to Dr. Moore himself, based on a small female variety of T’. bremeri, Felder. B. Hindwing with a double series of very large clear white spots :— under which he places (1) T. pryeri, Moore, (2) T. pryert heylertsii, Moore, (8) 7. pryert niasica, Moore, (4) T. pryert mentawica, Hagen, and (5) T. pryert nicevillet, Moore. Of 1’. crameri brookei, Moore, he notes that it is perhaps a dry-season form of T. crameri, Lucas; while of T. pryert heyleertsii, Moore, he notes that it is apparently a rainy-season form. These surmises are I think quite incorrect, as in Borneo, Sumatra, and the Malay Peninsula, where these species are said to occur, very few butterflies indeed exhibit seasonal changes, there being no well-marked wet- and dry-seasons, rain falling almost throughout the year, and 16 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, certainly’ no such seasonal forms are found in the genus Hupleéa occur- ring in those regions. - [have long held the opinion, gained by an extensive knowledge of the genus Huplea in life, that in nearly all cases it is highly improbable that any one spot will contain two really distinct species of one group of the genus. Dr. Moore in his most valuable monograph of the genus Euplea written in 1883 evidently had no such suspicion, never having seen a live Huplea, nor an opportunity of examining hundreds of speci- mens from a single locality as I have frequently done, as, for instance, he gave six (one with a query) species of Tronga from Borneo; six of Pademma from Assam, and probably several others, as he records four other species from EH. and N.-E. Bengal, and another with a query, which probably mean Assam; four of Isamia from South China and three from Cochin China; and four of Stzctoplea from Assam. While working up the Bornean Trongas, I thought it would be well to verify as far as I could this general opinion of mine that it is exceptional for two distinct species of one group to really occur in any one given locality, and taking up only India and those regions lying adjacent thereto and Southern China, regions that I am more or less well acquainted with from visiting many of them for the purpose of collecting butterflies, I find on the whole that my conjectures are likely to prove correct, though in two or three groups, subgenera or genera (it is immaterial for our purpose how we term them, though I prefer subgenera in our present ignorance of the transformations of most of the species), this is certainly not the case, as in Penoa we have a brilliantly blue-glossed species (devone, Westwood) and a non-blue-glossed species (dowbledayi, Felder) occurring together in Sikkim, Assam and Burma; while two quite distinct non-glossed species, differing entirely in size and male sexual brands, gardineri, | Fruhstorfer, and menetriesii, Felder (=pinwilli, Butler and evalida, Swinhoe) vccur together in the Malayan Peninsula and Sumatra; again in Pademma we have in the region of Calcutta and southwards to Tra- vancore a species (kollavi, Felder) which is but slightly if at all blue- glossed in those regions, gradually merging in other parts of Bengal (the Maldah district for instance), Sikkim, Bhutan and Assam into a strongly blue-glossed species (klugii, Moore). It is difficult to know how to deal in systematic work with such forms, as the one is quite distinct and constant in one region, while in another region this erst- - while “good species’ becomes gradually merged into another species which in its extremest form is absolutely different. In Hongkong also two apparently quite distinct species of Crastva occur, viz., godartit, Lucas, and kinbergi, Wallengren. However, these exceptional groups do not greatly invalidate my previous conceptions of these various subgenera 1901. ] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 17 of Huplea, as speaking generally I think it may be treated as an axiom that no two really distinct species of one subgenus will be found to inhabit one limited area. If would-be describers of Yupleas and several other genera would bear this in mind in future, we would be saved many of the synonyms of the past which burden our butterfly literature and give endless trouble in trying to unravel them. I may note here that I wholly dissent from the opinions held by Colonel C. Swinhoe as expressed in Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1893, p. 270, that varietal forms of well-known species should be named. It may be arguable that “varieties”” may perhaps be described and named for the sake of con- venience, though I consider it to be very inexpedient to do so, especially in certain groups of Hupleas in which it is almost impossible to find two specimens marked exactly alike, and to be logical every specimen should have a name and thus reduce scientific nomenclature to an absur- dity; but what I especially deprecate is calling these obvious varieties “new species,” which they certainly are not. However, the late Capt. E. Y. Watson in Journ. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soc., vol. x, pp. 639-640 (1897) has already very clearly pointed out the untenable position taken up by Col. Swinhoe in this matter, so I will not further attempt to “ kill the slain.” | To prove my thesis I will give some lists of subgenera of Huplea which I think will help to substantiate my case. These lists are not exhaustive and may perhaps contain some slight inaccuracies, but: they me I believe in the main correct, and may prove perhaps to be some help to others in working at this great group. The names placed in brackets are in my opinion synonyms. The order of subgenera is that followed in Dr. Moore’s monograph of the Hupleina published in 1883. It would have been better to have given two lists, one of localities the other of species, but this would have taken up too much time and space, so I have adopted the second course ; the first can with a little trouble be evolved from it. Mernama, Moore. Lower Burma, modesta, Butler (cupreipennis, Moore, tavoyana, Malay Peninsula, modesta, Butler. [ Moore). Siam, camaralzeman, Butler. gf », modesta, Butler. . Nicobar Isles, simulatriz, Wood-Mason and de Nicéville. Sumatra, moorei, Butler. 7 - buatont, Moore. Borneo, lorzs, Moore. on PE, a 18 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, Menama does not apparently support my theory, as from the list above two species are given from Siam; but Siam is a large country and may have two distinct species of Menama occurring in different parts of it, though as camaralzeman and modesta apparently differ not at all except in size—this difference being very considerable—it may be that they are one and the same species. Again two species, mooret and buxtont, are recorded from Sumatra, the former is non-blue-glossed, the latter is blue-glossed. I have had very numerous specimens of moore from thence, it is very common there, but I have never seen buxtoni, so there may be some mistake about the habitat of that species. Dr: Moore places moorei in Tonga, but it is a true Menama. Tronaa, Moore. Lower Burma, crameri, Lucas (bremeri, Felder, johanna, Kirby, marsdeni, Moore, olivacea, Moore, brookei, Moore, labuana, Moore, daatensis, Moore, pryeri, Moore, heyleertsiz, Moore). Malay Peninsula, crameri, Lucas. Nicobar Isles, frawenfeldii, Felder (espert, Felder, biseriata, Moore). Sumatra, crameri, Lucas. Banka, cramer, Lucas. Bali, cramert, Lucas. Borneo, cramerz, Lucas. Natuna Isles, cramer, Lucas. Java, tenggerensis, Fruhstorfer, and ab. biseriata, Fruhstorfer. Nias Island, niasica, Moore. Bawean Island, pagenstechert, Hagen. Mentawej Isles, morrist, Hagen. * » mentawica, Hagen. The subgenus Tronga is more fully considered on pages 30-38. I need only note here that I have not seen the two species recorded from the Mentawej Isles described as distinct by Dr. Hagen. It is highly probable I think that they are synonymous, and moveover are not separable from some previously-described species. ApicAmMa, Moore. Malay Peninsula, malayica, Butler (stolli, Weymer). Sumatra, malayica, Butler. Nias Island, malayica, Butler. Java, ochsenheimeri, Moore. Borneo, scudderii, Butler. Palawan (Philippines), claudina, Staudinger. 1901.] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 19 I have nothing to remark about this subgenus; each of the four known species inhabits a distinct area, and no two of them have been recorded from the same area. 3 Prnoa, Moore. Eastern Himalayas, doubledayi, Felder. is ‘A deione, Westwood (poey:, Felder, magnifica, Assam, doubledayz, Felder. [ Butler). deione, Westwood. Upper Burma, doubledayi, Felder. = 5 detone,, Westwood. Lower Burma, doubledayi, Felder. - gardinert, Fruhstorfer. . », limborgit, Moore. Malay Peninsula, gardinerz, Fruhstorfer. - be menetriesit, Felder (pinwillit, Butler, evalida, Indo-China, limborgii, Moore. [Swinhoe). a gardinert, Fruhstorfer. Sumatra, menetriesii, Felder. +! gardinert, Fruhstorfer. Nias Island, menetriesii, Felder. kheili, Weymer. 5 ~& uniformis, Moore. Banka, menetriesiz, Felder. Java, alcathoé, Godart (melancholica, Butler). », wallengrenit, Felder. » ¢ geyert, Felder. 5, ? eyndhovit, Felder. Billiton, transpectus, Moore.* Lombok, ? geyeri, Felder. e sapitana, Fruhstorfer. Borneo, wniformis, Moore. » zonata, Druce. 5 masina, Fruhstorfer. Mentawej Isles, sevtz:, Hagen. Palawan (Philippines), cyllene, Staudinger. 8 ns distincta, Staudinger. I have made some remarks on the subgenus Penoa on page 16. It is 99 99 99 9 * Mynheer P.C.T. Snellen in Tijd. voor Ent., vol. xxxiii, p. 284, n. 4 (1890), records H, alcathoé from Billiton. It is unknown to me whether or no he considers P, transpectus to be a synonym of that species. 20 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, an exception to my theory that two allied species of the same subgenus do not as a rule occur in the same region. The synonymy of the subgenus has been greatly changed since Dr. Moore’s Monograph of the Eupleina was published in 1883, and since his ‘‘ Lepidoptera Indica ” appeared. In the first-named paper his No. 1, alcathoé, Godart, is the doubledayt of Felder; his No. 3, menetriesiz, Felder, is the gardineri of Fruhstorfer; and his No. 4, pinwillii, Butler, is the menetriesit of Felder. I think the number of recorded species in this genus will be greatly reduced in the future, and many of the names given above as repre- senting distinct species will be reduced to the rank of synonyms. I possess only doubleday1, deione, gardineri, limborgit, menetriesit, alcathoé, ? geyert, untformis, and zonata. CrastiA, Hiibner. Western Himalayas Eastern nl core, Cramer (cora, Hibner, vermiculata, Continental India Butler, nicevillei, Moore). Peninsular _,, Ceylon, asela, Moore. Burma (Upper only) core, Cramer. Burma, godartit, Lucas (stamensis, Felder, layardi, Druce, subdita, Malay Peninsula, graminifera, Moore. [Moore, binghamz, Moore). ? godartit, Lucas. 3 distantii, Moore, Tne: China, godartit, Lucas. mouhotit, Moore. Me ? amymone, Godart. FS ins, kinbergi, Wallengren. lorquinit, Felder (felderi, Butler). ? amymone, Godart. godartit, Lucas. ». prunosa, Moore. Nicobar Isles, scherzert, Felder (camorta, Moore). Sumatra, ? amymone, Godart. inconspicua, Moore. distantit, Moore. i“ feldert, Butler. Engano Isle, enganensis, Doherty. es ,, oceanis, Doherty. Java, haworthii, Lucas (eleusina, Hiibner, part, pl. ccxxu (ix), 7 figs. 1, 2, mec Cramer, hiibnert, Moore, mooret, Felder, janus, Butler). PP] 9 9 99 ? he) 9 99 9 1901. ] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 21 Java, godartiz, Lucas. . Philippines, snellent, Moore. ‘9 godarti, Lucas. From the list above it would appear that Crastia does not bear out my theory at all, Under core I have placed cora, Hiibner, and vermi- culata, Butler, as these names represent the dry-season form of the species. I have also added nicevillei, Moore, which comes from the Sunderbans, near Calcutta. Many years ago four specimens of the “‘ species’”’ were given to me, taken in February, and I set them down to be rather unusually white examples of the dry-season form of core (cora+vermiculata). Two of these I gave to Colonel Swinhoe, and Dr. Moore described them as T’ronga nicevillei in Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 77, pl. xx. The male has no sexual brand in the submedian interspace of the forewing, this brand, however, is often obsolete in C. core, and is not a character of much importance. The wings also are broader than in typical C. core. In spite of these obvious differences, I am still of opinion that Tronga nicevillet is nothing more than the dry-season form of Crastia core found in the swamps of the Sunderbans. I cannot believe that an absolutely distinct species of Huplawa is alone to be found in a very limited area of recently formed alluvial land attached to the mainland of Bengal. Hxcept for this “species” India proper and Ceylon is each inhabited by only a single species of Orastia. We now come to Burma, where godartit, Lucas, of which siamensis, Felder, is an undoubted synonym, is the dominant form. With it is found layardi, Druce, of which binghami, Moore, is a pure synonym. In this form the pale violet apical area to the forewing on the upperside in both sexes is absent ; but this feature is not constant, and intergrades between true godartii and true layardi are occasionally found. But in the extreme north of Burma on the coast at Akyab, at Rangoon, and in Upper Tenasserim in Central Burma at Hatsiega is found subdita, Moore, which is the type and only species of Moore’s genus Mahintha. The only specimens of this form that I have seen are from Akyab and the Arakan Hills, the latter locality being rather uncertain, as my speci- mens did not reach me direct from the collector but through a third person. These examples do not quite agree with Dr. Moore’s figures of subdita from Akyab, (Lep. Ind., vol. i, pl. xxix), being less broad in the wing. Asa species I do not consider it to be distinct from layardi, which again equals godarti, although its wings are a little broader than typical Specimens of the last-named species. It bears the same relation to godartw that nicevillet does to core. In Upper Burma (Akyab, the Arracan Coast, and at Rungamutti in the Chittagong district) 2. core has been obtained singly. 22 L, de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. — [No. , In the Malay Peninsula, distantii, Moore, was described from a single specimen from Province Wellesley (in Sumatra it is the common and dominant Crastia), but godartii has been recorded by Mr. Distant from Singapore, probably erroneously, and Dr. Moore has described Orastia graminifera from the ‘“‘ Malay Peninsula” apparently from a unique male example in Mr, Oberthir’s collection. He compares it with verniculata, Butler, but from the description it would appear to be nothing but a form of C. distantii, Moore, with rather smaller spots than in the typical specimens of that species; an obviously variably character in my large series of that species. Mr. Distant in his ‘ Rhopalocera Malayana” ignores graminifera altogether. In Indo-China, which includes Siam, godarti is the commonest species. Dr. Moore records Orastia amymone, Godart, originally de- scribed from Amboina, from Cochin China, a species I am quite unable to recognise from the original description, and Dr. Arnold Pagen- stecher says in his paper on the butterflies of Amboina that he has not seen it from thence. Lastly, Dr. Moore describes a Menama mouhotit from Cambodia, of which I have a typical male from Chentaboon in Siam, This species has no male brand, and the wings are broader and more rounded than in typical Crastda. It therefore is an analogous species to nicevillet and subdita, and in my opinion is nothing but an aberrant form of layardi (=binghami), which again equals godartii (=siamensis). If my conjectures are right, it is very remarkable that the subgenus Crastia should have given rise to three aberrant forms in three well-defined regions, all differing one from the other and in differ- ent ways from the parent forms. Crastia appears to be in a highly plastic state. From China proper five species have been recorded—kinbergi, Wal- lengren, of which lorquinii, Felder, and felderi, Butler, are I believe synonyms ; godartw, Lucas (these two species occur together in Hong- kong, and are I believe distinct) ; amymone, Godart, the Amboina Species twice before mentioned; and prunosa, Moore. This latter is described from the very vague locality “‘ China” apparently from a single - male in M. Oberthiir’s collection. If it should be found to occur in Hongkong it will probably prove to be a synonym of kinbergi. In the Nicobar Isles we have a single species of Crastia, the scher- zert of Felder, which was I believe originally wrongiy labelled from Ceylon, and is therefore almost certainly the camorta of Moore.* It is not a true Crastia, as although it has the Crastia brand on the forewing in the male, it has as well the secondary sexual characters of Menama on the hindwing, which are not found in true Orastia. * Vide de Nicéville, Journ, A.S.B., vol. Ixviii, pt, 2, p. 178 (1899). 1901.] UL. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 23 In Sumatra, the butterflies of the N.-E. portion of which are well- known to me in life,* only one species of Crastia is I believe to be found, the distantiz of Moore ; though amymone, Godart, described from Amboina, has been recorded from thence; and inconspicua, Moore, and felderi, Butler, have been both described from Sumatra. C. felderi certainly occurs in Hongkong and is a synonym of lorquinii, Felder; while C. inconspicua, the description of which discloses a species apparently distinct from either distantii or felderi, having an immaculate forewing on the upperside, may have been wrongly labelled by Dr. A. R. Wallace, or occurs in a different part of the island to that with which I am familiar. From Java two distinct species have been recorded—godartii, Lucas, which was I believe originally described from Java, but the work in which it is described is not in the Calcutta libraries, anyhow, it probably does not really occur in Java; and haworthit, Lucas (=hibneri, Moore, + - moorei, Felder, + janus, Butler, = elewsina, Hiibner, part, nec Cramer). In my collection I have but a single Crastia from Java, which I call haworthii, Lucas. It is extremely variable, in some male specimens the brand is almost half the length and quite half the breadth that it is in others, and the maculation also is not exactly the same in any two of my four- teen specimens. I think that Mr. W. F. Kirby in the new edition of Hiibner’s Ex. Schmett., pp. 6, 7, has misinterpreted the figures on pl. 222 (9) of that work. Figures 1 and 2 represent a male Crastia which will stand as C. haworthii, Lucas, = hiibneri, Moore, = mooret, Felder, = janus, Butler; while figures 3 and 4 represent the female of Selinda eleusina, Cramer, the male of which is figured by Cramer in Ex. Lep., on plate cclxvi, fig. D. Mr. Kirby calls figs. 1 and 2 “ Selinda janus, Butler,” and figs. 3 and 4 “ Selinda eleusina, Stoll [Cramer]. In Java only one species of Crastia appears to be found. From the Philippines two species of Crastia have been recorded, snellent, Moore, and godarti, Lucas, the latter almost certainly incorrectly. TREPSICHROIS, Hiibner. Himalayas, A Oudh, Central Provinces, | claudius, Fabriciust (linnxi, Moore, van-deven- Assam, teri, Forbes). Burma, Malay Peninsula, J) * Vide de Nicéville, Journ. A.S.B., vol. lxiv, pt. 2, pp. 857-555 (1895). + Vide Aurivillius, Ent. Tids., vol. xviii, p. 141, n. 7 (1897). 24 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No.1], Indo-China, > China, Formosa, Nicobar Isles, claudius, Fabricius* (linnet, Moore, van-deven- Sumatra, | teri, Forbes). . Bawean, Natuna Isles, New Guinea? J Ganjam on the E. coast of peninsular India, kalinga, Doherty. Nias Isle, verhuelli, Moore. Bali, Java, ? Malay Peninsula, Billiton, Banka, Borneo, Engano Isle, malakoni, Doherty. Mentawij Isles, maassi, Hagen. Philippine Isles, semperi, Felder (tisiphone, Butler). basilissa, Cramer. mulciber, Cramer. a3 » diocletia, Hiibner (dufresne, Godart, megilla, i 5, kocht, Moore. [ Hrichson ). - 5 visaya, Semper. és » mindanaensis, Semper. i », seraphita, Fruhstorfer. a » linnei, var. paupera, Staudinger. The subgenns T'repsichrois bears out my theory very well, no two species occurring in the same spot. The development of the subgenus is very remarkable in the different islands of the Philippine Archipelago, where the most aberrant and distinct species are found. Evuria@a, Fabricius, Ceylon, corus, Fabricius (elisa, Butler). Assam ? vitrina, Fruhstorfer ? Burma, vitrina, Fruhstorfer. Malay Peninsula, castelnaut, Felder (phebus, Butler). Indo-China, drucei, Moore. Nicobar Isles, castelnaut, Felder. Sumatra, castelnaui, Felder. Nias Isles, pheretena, Kheil. Engano, micronesia, Doherty. * Vide Aurivillius, Ent. Tids., vol, xviii, p. 141, n. 7 (1897). 1901. ] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 25 Java, pavettw, Zinken-Sommer. 5 gyllenhali, Lucas. ,, castelnaut, Felder. Banka, castelnaut, Felder. Borneo, butleri,; Moore. » godmani, Moore. Bawean, castelnaui, Felder. Philippines (Palawan), salvini, Staudinger. Celebes, celebica, Fruhstorfer, Talaut Isles, locupletior, Fruhstorfer. Engano Isle, micronesia, Doherty. The subgenus Huplea bears out my theory very well. It is true that three species have been recorded from Java and two from Borneo but it is almost certain that only one species occurs in each eta. Mr. Fruhstorfer in Stet. Ent. Zeit., vol. lx, p. 353 (1899), gives only pavettse from Java and butlert from Hee which is almost certainly a correct statement of the facts. CaALLIPL@a, Butler. Lower Burma, lederert, Felder (inquinata, Butler). Malay Peninsula, ledereri, Felder. Indo-China, musa, Swinhoe. Sumatra, ? ledereri, Felder. P eunus, de Nicéville. Java, mazares, Moore. Bali, mazares, Moore. Natuna Isles, mazares, Moore. Borneo, avistotelis, Moore, Lombok, sambavana, Doherty. Sumba, swmbana, Doherty. Batjan, ledereri, Felder. Flores, mazares, Moore. Philippines, pollita, Erichson. monilis, Moore. 7 (Palawan), palawana, Fruhstorfer. Hainan Island, China, hainana, Holiand. North China, marzesis, Moore. The subgenus Culliplea supports my theory very well , althongh the two first-named species occurring in the Philippine Ar See) are sometimes found on the same islands. It is very doubtful if two; Species are found in Sumatra, the recorded Jledereri being probably my later- described. eunus. J: i. 4 39 26 L. de Nicéville— Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [ No. ], Danisepa, Moore. Kastern Himalayas, mt Assam, Burma, Malay Peninsula, Indo-China, ‘ diocletianus, Fabricius (radamanthus, Fabricius, ramsayt, Moore). Sumatra, Billiton, Banka, Natuna Isles, J Nias Island, schretbert, Butler (maassenz, Weymer, niasana, Swinhoe, Java, alcidice, Godart (thoosa, Hiibner). (niasica, Snellen). Borneo, lowei, Butler. Dr. Moore in Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 114 (1891) records D. shreiberi [sic!] from Borneo, but that species is I believe strictly confined to Nias. Mynheer P. C. T. Snellen has written an interesting note on the subgenus Danisepa in Tijd. voor Ent., vol. xlii, pp..101-105 (1899), but omits all reference to D. schretbert, Butler, which is an older name than D. niasica, Snellen. I am unable, as Dr. Moore did in 1883, to draw any line between diocletianus and radamanthus. In 1890 he united these two species, but gave the latter name (rhadamanthus, sic!) precedence, while diocletianus in the older, and described ramsayi as a new species, restricting it to the Hastern Himalayas. That species gradually merges into diocletianus, though typical specimens have the white markings larger ; but this is an inconstant character. Mr. W. F. Kirby points out in the new edition of Htbner’s Ex. Schmett., p. 5, that in Godart’s D. alcidice from Java no mention is made in the description of the white marginal spots on the forewing. This is probably an omission only, as no species of Danisepa is known from Java or elsewhere in which these spots are lacking, though they are blue rather than white. Kirby gives D. thoosa specific rank to the exclusion of the older alcidice. Danisepa supports my theory very well, as the several species nowhere overlap. SALPINX, Hiibner. Lower Burma, ) Malay Peninsula, | leucostictos, Gmelin (dehaanii, Lucas, Western China, > novare, Felder, vestigiata, Butler, lazulina, Nicobar Isles, | Moore, lewcogonys, Butler), Sumatra, J . 1901.) =‘. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Trovga. 27 - Nias Isle, ) Java, | leucostictos, Gmelin (dehaanii, Lucas, Bali, r novarxz, Felder, vestigiata, Butler, lazulina, Borneo, | | Moore, leucogonys, Butler). Talaut Islands, J Borneo, kadu, Eschscholtz. Engano Island, phane, Doherty. Philippine Isles, kadu, Hschscholtz (ewnice, Godart, hewitsonit, is ‘5 oculata, Moore. [ Butler). a 3 simillima, Moore. 9 » althza, Semper. ” 9 meldolx, Moore. Amboina, leucostictos, Gmelin. -Hainan Island, negleyana, Holland. toge N. Formosa Island, hobsoni, Butler, In the Philippine Isles the various species of Salpina occur ther on several of the islands, which goes to disprove my theory ; elsewhere the several species appear to inhabit well-defined separate area s, except in Borneo, where leucosticéos and kadu are both found. ‘i PapremMa, Moore. Behar, (klugit, Moore (tllustris, Butler, grantiz, Bengal (Maldah), Butler, dharma, Moore, augusta, Moore, Sikkim hills, indigofera, Moore, imperialis, Moore, regalis, Bhutan, Moore, macclellandi, Moore, wniformis, Assam, Moore, sherwillit, Moore, | hamiltont, Upper Burma, | Swinhoe). Bengal (Maldah), Assam, | klugit, Moore, geographical race erichsonii, Upper Burma, Felder (crassa, Butler, masonz, Moore, pem- Lower Burma, bertonit, Moore, apicalis, Moore, burmeistert, Malay Peninsula, | Moore). Indo-China, J Sikkim, Bengal, ) retugit, Moore, geographical race kollari, Felder Orissa, j (rothneyi, Moore). South India, year Ceylon, sinhala, Moore. Hainan Island, minorata, Moore. I have nothing to add to what I wrote on this subgenus nearly ten. sago. The two geographical races separated above are not strictly 28 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, geographically separated, as they overlap the typical form at certain points. The Ceylonese species can be satisfactorily separated from the continental form ; the species from Hainan I have not seen. Isamra, Moore. Nepal, a) Sikkim, | Bhutan, rogenhofert, Felder (splendens, Butler, irawada, Assam, r Moore). Upper Burma, | Central Burma, J Central Burma, Lower Burma, Malay Peninsula, _ Indo-China, grotei, Felder (part, male only), margarita, Butler (adamsoni, Marshall, brahma, Moore, carpenteri, Moore). i » margarita, Butler. ies » marseuli, Moore. 99 99 fabricii, Moore. ; midamus, Linnsus (superba, Herbst, alopia, Southern China, Godart, sinica, anes ; Northern China, dameli, Moore. Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, | Nias Island, si ae) Poles chloé, Guérin (agyptus, Butler, dejeant, Distant, ed staudingert, Kheil, rafflesi, Moore, singapura, 9 . e . Banka, | Moore, sophia, Moore, lowe’, Moore). Billiton, Borneo. J Mantawej Isles, sticheli, Hagen. From the list given above it will be seen that it is only in Indo- China that more than one species of Isamia is found. I. grotei, male only, described from “ Cochin” (Cochin China being evidently meant, not the district of that name in South India) is probably the same as I. margarita, Butler; I. marseuli is probably the same species; but I. fabricit belongs to quite another group (2.e., to the chloé group), being entirely unglossed with blue on the upperside, which is a conspicuous feature in the other three species. Unfortunately I do not possess a single specimen of Isamia from any part of Indo-China, so am unable to speak about them from first-hand knowledge. 1901.] L. de Nicéville—Butiterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 29 Narmapa, Moore. Ceylon, montana, Felder (lankana, Moore). South India, coreta, Godart (coreotdes, Moore). Sumatra, ? consimilis, Felder. 5 martini, de Nicéville. Java, consimilis, Felder. I have seen no specimen of N. consimilis from Sumatra. N. mar- tinii from that island is not a true Narmada, as the male sexual brands are not typical; nor dves the shape of the wings agree with those of typical Narmada. I may mention that N. coreta does occur in Orissa, Ihave many specimens from thence. Dr. Moore notes in Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 134, that its identification from thence “Is probably erroneous, and requires confirmation.” N. consimilis seems to be extremely rare, I have seen no specimen of it. SticropL@a, Butler. Kastern Himalayas, Hf Assam, Burma, Malay Peninsula, Indo-China, Sumatra, Borneo, Palawan (Philippines), dotata, Fruhstorfer. Philippines, lztifica, Butler. ai bazilana, Fruhstorfer. Sumatra, picina, Butler. 3 inconspicua, Butler. > mesta, Butler. Java, Sambawa, Formosa, swinhoet, Wallace. S. tyrianthina is very doubtfully distinct from S. harrist?, Four species of Stictoplea have been recorded from Sumatra. Out of the many hundreds of Hupleas which have passed through my hands from that island, I have seen but one species, which I identify as tyrianthina. S. mesta is recorded from thence by Dr. Butler in Proc. Zool. Soe. _Lond., 1866, p. 284, n. 49, p. 281, fig. 3, male, and Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., third series, vol. v, p. 474, n. 51 (1867), and these records were overlooked by me in my paper on the butterflies of Sumatra in Journ. A.S.B., vol. Ixiv, pt. 2, pp. 857-555 (1895). Dr. Moore gives it from New Guinea only. Notes by me on the Indian and Malay Peninsula harris, Felder (grotei, Felder, part, female only, hoper, Felder, microsticta, Butler, binotata, Butler, regina, Moore, pygmea, ] Moore, crowley, Moore). ‘ tyrianthina, Moore. ‘ lacordairei, Moore. 30 L. de Nicévillé—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, species of Stictoplea will be found in Proc. A.S.B., 1892, pp. 158-16], and Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1892, pp. 247-248. I now return to the discussion of the various species of the sub- genus J'ronga, and will take up each of them in the order 1 in which they were first described. 1. TRONGA CRAMERI, Lucas. Euplea crameri, Lucas, Rev. et Mag. de Zool., 1853, p. 318, male; id., Moore, Horsfield and Moore, Cat. Lep. Mus. H.I.C., vol. i, p. 129, n. 256 (1857), male ; id., Butler, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1866, p. 277, n. 27; id., Druce, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1873, p. 388, n. 4; Crastia erameri, Butler, Journ. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., vol. xiv, p. 297, n. 7 (1878); id., Snellen, Notes Leyden Mus., vol. xvii, p. 118, n. 2 (1895); Ewplca (Crastia) crameri, Marshall and de Nicéville, Butt. of India, -vol. i, p. 78, pl. viii, fig. 15, male (1882); Tronga crameri, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 266, n. 1; idem, id., Lep, Ind., vol. i, p. 79 (1890) ; id., Frahstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898). Hasitat: Manilla (Lucas); Borneo (Moore); Borneo (Butler) ; Borneo (Druce) ; Natuna Isles (Snellen) ; Borneo (Marshall and de Nicé- ville) ; North and South Borneo, Mt. Mulu (Fruhstorfer). This species was originally described from Manilla, in Luzon, the capital of the Philippines, but according to all authors including Herr G. Semper in Schmett. Philipp., p. 33 (1886), itis not found there. I have not had access to the original description, so do not know exactly what form of it M. Lucas described. The specimen I figured in 1882 may perhaps be typical, it has, on the upperside of the forewing, one discal spot in the second median interspace, and six submarginal spots, both the marginal and submarginal series on the hindwing obsolete. The specimen Dr. Moore has kindly marked for me as typical has eight submarginal spots on the forewing and a few (six) marginal spots on the hindwing, one belonging to the inner series. Dr. Butler notes that “The description by M. Lucas answers to Moore’s species.” It is ex- tremely variable, even in Borneo, and has been. given, in my opinion, nine synonymic names. 2, Tronca KInBeERGI, Wallengrén. Euplea kinbergi, Wallengrén, Wien. Ent. Monatsch., vol. iv, p. 35, n. 8 (1860) ; idem, id., Kongl. Svenska Fregatten Eugenies Resa, Zoologi, Insecta, pt. 4, p. 352, n. 4 (1861); id., Butler, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1866, p. 273, n. rae 453; Crastia kinbergi, id., Journ. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zoology, vol. xiv, p. 297, n. 6 (1878); Tronga kinbergi, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc, Lond., 1883, p. 269, n. 12; Huplea ie onga) kinbergi, Fruhs- torfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xli, p. 300 (1896). Hasrrar: China, December (Wallengrén) ; China (Butler) ; China (Moore) ; Tengger mountains, 2,000 feet, Hast Java (Fruhstorfer).. 1901. ] L. de Nicéville—Butterjlies of the subgenus Tronga. 3) When describing this species, Wallengrén gave “China” as its: habitat, which is very vague, but as most of the older writers had access to species from Southern China only, 7. kinbergi probably came from the Canton district or from the Island of Hongkong, both in Southern China. He compares it with H. alopia, Godart, which is an ‘Isamia. He does not give the sex of the type specimen. The descrip- tion agrees very well with some of my specimens of the very variable Euplea (Orastia) lorquinii, Felder (= LE. feldert, Butler), the commonest species in Hongkong. Should this species prove to be same as lorquinit, Wallengrén’s name will stand, being the older. Butler in 1866 recorded it from China, and noted that “ I. felderi may be a local form of FE. kinberyi, Wallengren,” which is probably a correct assumption. Moore in 1883 gave it as a Tonga from China, and said that specimens were in the collection of the British Museum, but in 1890 he made no mention of it in “ Lep. Ind.” amongst the extra-Indian species of Tronga. Fruhstorfer recorded it from Java, which is almost certainly incorrect; as far as I know, no species of Huplwa is common to both China and Java, and there is no reason to suspect that FH. kinbergi came from anywhere else than China.* 3. TRONGA BREMERI, Felder. Euplea bremeri, Felder, Wien. Ent. Monatsch., vol. iv, p. 398, n. 16 (1860) ; id Butler, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1866, p. 277, n. 28; idem, id., Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., second series, vol. i, pp. 535, 564, n. 6 (1877); id., Druce, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1873, p. 338, p.5; id., Godman and Salvin, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1878, p. 638, n, 8; id., Distant, Rhop. Malay., pp. 23, 410, n. 2, pl. ii, fig. 4,- male (1882, 1886); id., Marshall and de Nicéville, Butt. India, Burmah and Ceylon, vol. i, p. 78, n. 60 (1882) ; s id., Marshall, Proc. .A. 8. B., 1882,-p. 143, n. 60; ane Adamson, Notes Danaine Beviial, p. 10 (1889) ; ideih, id., Cat. Butt. Burmah, p. 5, n. 26 (1889) ; id., Hagen, Tidjsch. van het Kon. Ned. Aard. Genootsch., 1890, p. ist, n. 2; idem, id., Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xxxvii, p. 148, n. 8 (1892); idem, id., Iris, vol. vii, p. 41, n. 104 (1894); id., Pagenstecher, in Kiikenthal’s Erg. einer zool. Forsch. Molukken und in Borneo, p. 389, n. 109 (1897) ; Crastia bremeri, Butler, Journ. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., vol. xiv, p. 298, n. 9 (1878); Tronga bremeri, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc, Lond., 1883, p. 267, n. 4, pl. xxix, fig. 5, male; idem, id., Journ. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., vol. xxi, p. 30 (1886); idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 76, pl. xix, figs. 1, la, 1b, male; Ic, 1d, female (1890) ; EB. (Tronga) bremeri, Adamson, Cat. Butt. Burmah, p. 7, n. 15 * Since the above was written Professor Chr. Aurivillius has sent me a_ beanti- fnl coloured drawing of the type specimen of Euplea kinbergi, Wallengrén, this drawing I hope to reproduce in a later paper. It represents a female example of probably the commonest form of Huplea found in Hongkong and on the opposite mainland of Southern China. The Huplea lorquinii of Felder and £. fous of Butler are synonyms of E, kinbergi. It is a Crastia, not a Tronga, ~ a2 L. de Nicéville--Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No.1], (1897); id., de Nicéville and Martin, Journ. A.S.B., vol. lxiv, pt. 2, p. 370, n. 19 (1895) ; Tronga crameri bremeri, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898). Hasitat: Malay Peninsula (Felder); Malayan Peninsula; India; Assam and Nepal (sic!) ; Malacca ; Province Wellesley; Penang; Singa- pore ; Borneo ; Sumatra (Butler) ; Borneo ; Peninsula Malayica ( Druce) ; Billiton; Borneo; Malacca (Godman and Salvin); Assam; Burma; Province Wellesley; Malacca; Tenasserin (Distant); Mergui Archi- pelago; Penang; Malacca; Singapore; Borneo; Sumatra ( Marshall and de Nicéville) ; Akyab, July (Marshall); Moulmain, June ; Moumagan in Tavoy, September (Adamson); Deli on the east coast of Sumatra ; Banka Island; Further India; Malacca (Hagen) ; Samarinda in Borneo . (Pagenstecher) ; Malacca ; Sumatra; India (Butler) ; Province Wellesley ; Tavoy; Mergui, December to March, very common; Akyab, July; Thoungyeen forests in Upper Tenasserim; Mergui Archipelago, Decem- ber to Mareh; Malay Peninsula (Moore); Tavoy coast, September, common; Moulmain, one pair, June (Adamson); N.-E. Sumatra, plains to 1,500 feet (de Nicéville and Martin); Malacca; Sumatra; Natuna Isles (Fruhstorfer). I consider this species to be a synonym of 7’. crameri, Lucas. It is extremely variable; Dr. Moore has devoted an entire plate to it in his Lep. Ind., which shews a few of these variations. ven its male secondary sexual characters are inconstant, as in Sumatra I have recorded that a few specimens have on the upperside of the forewing a short, sometimes quite a long and distinct, brand in the submedian interspace. These examples do not fit into Dr. Moore’s definition of his genus Tronga, which is described and usually does not possess a sexual- mark or scent-producing organ. But these aberrant examples are certainly not distinct as species from the more common typical specimens of T. bremeri. This brand is sometimes present and sometimes absent in other species of Huplea, as will be noticed hereafter. 1. bremert has been recorded from Assam and Nepal by Dr. Butler, but is not found further north than Akyab in Upper Burma. 4, 'TRONGA FRAUENFELDII, Felder. Euplea frauenfeldii, Felder, Verh. zool.-bot. Gesellsch. Wien, vol. xii, p. 479, n. 87 (1862); idem, id., Reise Nov., Lep., vol. ii, p. 342, n. 474, pl. xli, fig. 4, male (1865) ; id., Marshall and de Nicéville, Butt. Ind. Burmah and Ceylon, vol. i, p. 83, n. 66 (1882); id., de Nicéville, Journ. A.S.B., vol. Ixviii, pt, 2, p. 178 (1899) ; E. frauenfeldi, Butler, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1866, p. 458; idem, id., Journ, Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., vol. xiv, p. 300, n. 19 (1878). \ Hapitat: Ceylon (Felder); Ceylon (Marshall and de Nicéville) ; Nicobar Isles (de Nicéville) ; Ceylon (Butler) ; Trincomalee (Butler). 1901]. } L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 33 Felder in 1862 described this species from Ceylon from a male col- lected by the officers of the ‘ Novara” frigate which called at various ports. I believe that the specimen was incorrectly labelled, and really came from the Nicobars, where the ‘‘ Novara” called, as no Huplea answering to the description has since been found in Ceylon. Felder in 1865 redescribed both sexes of the species, retaining Ceylon as its habitat, but uniting to it his H. esperi, described from a female example from Kar Nicobar, though in his second description of H. frauenfeldii he omitted the Nicobars from the habitat of the species. In his 1866 monograph Dr. Butler noted quite correctly that the species is a local form of Ff. cramert, Lucas, and that it is very near to H. bremerz, Felder, as Felder said when describing it. In 1878 Dr. Butler recorded a male from Trincomalee in Ceylon. Dr. Moore described this specimen in his Lep. of Ceylon (where he gave LH. esperi as a synonym), and again in his Lep. Indica, and figured it in the latter work. It is not 7. frauen- feldii, having been wrongly identified, but is Crastia kinbergi, Wallen- gren, = FH. lorquinii, Felder, and FE. felderi, Butler. I am convinced that it never came from Ceylon, but was probably caught at Hongkong, where it is very common, by an officer of some man-of-war which sub- sequently visited the naval station of Trincomalee, and the specimen reached the British Museum from thence. JH. espert is undoubtedly a synonym of H. frauenfeldiz, as also is Tronga biseriata, Moore. T. frauenfelditi may be retained as a species or good local race of T. crameri, Lucas, as all the white spots on the forewing are very small and nearly uniform in size, while in H. crameri the spots of the submar- ginal series in the forewing are irregular in size, several of those towards the apex of the wing being much larger than the others, It is found in the Nicobar isles only, occurring, on most of the islands. It has a sexual brand in the male in the forewing in the submedian interspace in some specimens, which is variable in size and promineuce, and wholly absent in others. Those bearing this brand are considered by Dr. Moore to represent a distinct species, which he has called 7. biseriata. As noted by me in several places in this paper, this brand is very in- constant in many groups of Hupleas, and cannot be relied on to separate genera or subgenera by. 5. TRONGA ESPERI, Felder. y Verh. zool.-bot. Gesellsch. Wien, vol. xii, p. 482, n. 109 Euplea esperi, Fel (1862); id., Butler, Pr¢:. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1866, p. 453*; id., Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. * Omitted altogether by Dr. Butler in his 1878 revision of the butterflies of the genus Huplea in the collection of the British Museum, ei 6 34 Li. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, Lond., 1877, pp. 582, 623 ; id., Wood-Mason and de Nicéville, Journ. A.S.B., vol. 1, pt. 2, p. 227, n. 8 (1881); vol. li, pt. 2, p. 15, n. 7 (1882) ; id., Marshall and de Nicéville, Butt. India, Burmah and Ceylon, vol. i, p. 83, n. 65 (1882); id., de Nicéville, Journ. A.S.B., vol. Ixviii, pt. 2, p. 178 (1899); Crastia esperi, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 278, n.6; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 88, pl. xxvii, figs. 2, 2a, male; 2b, female (1890). Hasitat: Kar Nicobar (Felder); Nicobar Islands (Butler); Kar Nicobar, Nicobars (Moore); Pulo Kondul, Kamorta, Trinkut, Katschall (Wood-Mason and de Nicéville) ; Nicobars (Marshall and de Nicéville) ; Nicobar Isles (de Nicéville); Kar Nicobar, Kamorta (Moore). This species is, in my opinion, a synonym of F. frauenfeldii, Felder, to which Felder himself united it, as also did Dr. Moore in 1880. Felder compared it with the Philippine [sic] Z. cramert, Lucas. For further notes regarding it see the last species. 6, TRoNGA JOHANNA, Kirby. Euplea johanna, Kirby, Syn. Cat. Diurn. Lep., p. 17, n. 181 (1871); id., Kheil, Rhop. Nias, p. 17 (1884); id., Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898). | Hapitat: Borneo (Kirby). Mr. W. F. Kirby renamed the Huplea crameri, Moore, described in Horstield and Moore’s Cat. Lep. Mus. E.I.C., vol. i, p. 129, n. 256 (1857), from Borneo, as he considered it to represent a species distinct from the earlier H. crameri of Lucas, from Manilla in the Philippines, this locality, as previously noted, being in all probability incorrect. As, however, Dr. Moore says that his EL. crameri is the same species as that of Lucas, Kirby’s H. johanna falls to it as a synonym. 7. TRONGA BISERIATA, Moore. T. biseriata, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc, Lond., 1883, p. 266, n. 2; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 78, pl. xxi, figs. 1, la, 16, male; le, 1d, female (1890); id de Nicéville, Journ. A.S.B., vol. Ixviii, pt. 2, p. 178 (1899) ; Tronga crameri biseriata, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898), Hasitat: Trinkut, Great Nicobar, Little Nicobar, Nancoury, Pulo Kondul—all in the Nicobar Isles (Moore) ; Nicobars (de Nicéville); Nicobars (F'ruhstorfer), I have said all that is necessary about this species under T. fried: feldu, Felder, of which it is a synonym. 8. TRONGA MARSDENI, Moore. T. marsdeni, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 266, n. 3; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 79 (1890); Euplea marsdeni, Distant, Rhop. Malay., p. 411, n. 18, ~ 1901.] L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgentis Tronga. 35 pl. xxxix, fig. 1, male (1886); Tronga crameri marsdeni, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898). Hasrrat: Singapore (Moore); Singapore (Distant); Singapore (Fruhstorfer). Mr. Distant allows this species full specific rank, and says he has received two specimens from Singapore, which both differ from the type specimen described by Dr. Moore from the same island, which shews that this ‘‘ species” is as variable as most of the other species in the subgenus. In my opinion it is a synonym of 1. crameri, Lucas, which species (as H. bremeri, Felder), has been recorded by several authors from numerous localities in the Malayan Peninsula. It is highly improbably that Singapore island, which has hardly a scrap of virgin forest remaining, has a distinct species of Tronga to itself. Dr. Moore says that it is “‘ An intermediate form between T. bremeri, Felder, and T. crameri, Lucas.” 9. TronGa oLivacea, Moore. T. olivacea, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 267, n. 5; id., Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898). Hasirar: Minthantoung, Thoungyeen valley, Tenasserim (Moore). This species was described from a single very small female specimei, Dr. Moore in Lep. Ind., p. 76, admits that it is a ‘‘ small var.” of 17’. bremeri, Felder, which itself is a synonym of 7’. cramer, Lucas. 10. Tronca niasica, Moore. T.-niasica, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 267, n. 7; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 79 (1890); Euplawa niasica, Kheil, Rhop. Nias, p. 17, n. 18, pl. i, fig. 2, female (1884); Tronga pryeri niasica, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch, vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898). Hasirat: Nias Island, W. coast of Sumatra (Moore) ; Nias (Kheil) ; Nias (Fruhstorfer). _ T have eight males, but no females, of this species. The markings are more constant than usual, though they vary considerably in detail, for instance, the submarginal dots on the hindwing may form a com- plete series or may be reduced to a solitary spot, and there are intergrades between these two extremes; the spots on the forewing vary also in size and number. The species may, perhaps, be kept distinct, as the spots in the forewing are more uniform in size than in the other species of the subgenus known to me, except J’. frauenfeldii, Felder, in which they are constantly smaller. 36 L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1,° ll. TRONGA BROOKEI, Moore. T. brookei, Moore, Proc. Zool]. Soc, Lond., 1883, p. 268, n. 8; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 79 (1890) ; id., Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898). Dr. Moore has kindly identified a male specimen of this species for me from Sarawak, Borneo, Sha marked it “Same as type,’ though it does not agree with the type, as in the forewing it has no marginal series of spots, in the type they are said to be present but “ very minute.’ Mr. Fruhstorfer says that Tronga brooket is identical with Menama lorze, Moore. This is entirely incorrect, the genus Menama has a sexual patch of androconia on the upperside of the hindwing not found in Tronga, brookei is a Tronga, and lorze is a Menama. I consider T’. brooket to be a synonym of 7, crameri, Lucas. Dr. Moore says it is “Comparatively smaller and narrower winged than 1. crameri; of a paler brown colour, and with a violet-blue tint.” 12. Tronga taBuana, Moore. T. labwana, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 268, n. 9; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 80 (1890); id., Fruhstorfer, Berl. Eut. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898). Hasirat: Labuan, Borneo (Moore). Dr. Moore has identified a male specimen of this species for me from Sarawak, Borneo. Though marked “Same as type” it does not agree exactly with the description of the type; and it would be extra- ordinary perhaps if it did, as in these Borneo T'rongas I cannot find two marked exactly alike. Mr. Fruhstorfer says that this species is a synonym of T. crameri, Lucas, wherein I agree with him. 13. TRONGA DAATENSIS, Moore. T. daatensis, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p. 268, n. 10; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 80 (1890); id., Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p, 189 (1898). Hasrratr: Island of Daat, Labuan, Borneo (Moore). Dr. Moore, not having access to the type of this species, was unable to match it with any of the Bornean Trongas I senttohim. As, however, from the description it only appears to differ from other Borneo Tyongas in some slight details of maculation I concur with Mr. Fruhstorfer in considering it to be a synonym of J’. crameri, Lucas. 14, TRONGA PRYERI, Moore. T. pryerit, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1888, p. 269, n. 11; idem, id., Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 80 (1890) ; id., Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitach., vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898) ; 1901.] . L. de Nicéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. 37 Euplea bremeri, var. pryeri, Distant and Pryer, Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist., fifth series, vol. xix, p. 47, n. 12 (1887). Hasrrat: Sandakan, Borneo (Moore); North Borneo (Fruhstorfer) ; Sandakan, Borneo (Distant and Pryer), . Dr. Moore has sent me a sketch of the type male of this species, none of the specimens I sent to him being identical. Its chief peculiarity appears to be the presence of a complete double series of rather large spots on the hindwing. Mr. Fruhstorfer takes T. pryeri as the type of his second division of the genus Tronga, based on this character, and gives heylertsit, Moore, niasica, Moore, mentawica, Hagen, and nicevillei, Moore, as subspecies of pryeri, though why he gives pryert precedence over niasica, the latter being the older species, and brooke: over lorze for the same reasen, is best known to himself. Though I sent no typical specimens of 1’. pryert from Borneo to Dr. Moore, I possess several of both sexes that agree with his description and sketch of that species, and it is in my opinion another synonym of T. crameri, Lucas. 15. Tronega HEYLzARTSII, Moore. T. heylxrtsit, Moore, Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 79 (1890); E. (Tronga) heylertsii, de Nicéville and Martin, Journ. A.S.B., vol. lxiv, pt. 2, p. 871, n. 21 (1896); T. pryer: heylaertsi, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898). Hasitat: Sumatra (Moore); Sumatra (de Nicéville and Martin) ; Sumatra; Malacca (Hruhstorfer). From the description alone I can identify this species without diffi- culty, as itis the commonest form of T'ronga occurring in Sumatra. It is another synonym of ‘’. crameri, Lucas. 16. TRONGA PAGENSTECHERI, Hagen. Euplea pagenstecher, Hagen, Jahr. des Nass. Ver. fiir Natur., vol. xlix, p, 182, n. 18, pl. iv, fig. 8, male (1896) ; Tronga crameri pagenstecheri, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898). Hasitat: Bawean Island (Hagen); Bawean (Fruhstorfer). I have not seen this species. Dr. Hagen says that it comes into Moore’s subgenus Menama, near M. lorze, Moore, [nec Boisduval], while Fruhstorfer puts it in the subgenus Tronga. 17. Tronea MENTAWiCA, Hagen. Euplea (Tronga) mentawica, Hagen, Ent. Nach., vol. xxiv, p. 199 (1898) ; Tronga pryert mentawica, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 189 (1898). Hasirat: Mentawej Islands (Hagen) ; Mentawej (f'ruhstorfer). I have not seen this species. 38 L. de N icéville—Butterflies of the subgenus Tronga. [No. 1, 18. Tronca morrist, Hagen. Euplea (Tronga) morrisi, Hagen, Ent. Nach., vol. xxiv, p. 199 (1898); Tronga morrist, Fruhstorfer, Berl, Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, p. 188 (1898).: Hasirat: Mentawej Islands (Hagen) ; Mentawej (Fruhstorfer). This species also I have not seen. It is highly improbable I think that two distinct species of T'ronga inhabit one tiny group of islets lying to the south of the central portion of Sumatra. Should one prove to be a Tronga and the other a Menama the occurrence of two closely-allied but subgenerically distinct species would be accounted for. 19. TRONGA TENGGERENSIS, Fruhstorfer. T. crameri tenggerensis, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol. xliii, pp. 187, 188 (1898), Hasirat: Tengger mountains, 2,000 feet, East Java (Fruhstorfer). I have seen no specimen of this species. See remarks on p. 14. 20. TRONGA BISERIATA, Fruhstorfer. T. crameri, ab, biseriata, Fruhstorfer, Berl. Ent. Zeitsch., vol, xliii, pp. 187, 188 (1898). Hasirat: Hast Java (Fruhstorfer). Mr, Fruhstorfer describes this as an ‘‘aberration” of JT. cramert, Lucas, which latter he records from ‘‘ North and South Borneo, Mt. Mulu,” only, and not from Java at all. Probably he intends it to be understood that it is an aberration of his ltenggerensis rather than of cramert. There is already a 'ronga biseriata (see n, 7, p. 34) of Moore, so as a distinct species it cannot stand in any case. I have not seen it. The two following species have been described in the genus Tronga :— 1. Tronga moore, Butler, vide Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1883, p- 267, n. 6, is a Menama. 2. Tronga nicevillet, Moore, Lep. Ind., vol. i, p. 77, pl. xx (1890), is an aberrant Crastia in my opinion. Also Menama mouhotii, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond , 1883, p. 265, n, 7, pl. xxxi, fig. 6, male, is in my opinion another aberrant Crastia. ee —_—~ a = 1901. ] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 39 IV —Novicie Indice XVIII. Vhe Asiatic species of Dalbergia.— | By D. Pratn. [Received 22nd April, 1901 ; Read June, 1901. | The writer, at such intervals during the past four years as have offered themselves in the routine of administrative duties, has given attention to the species of the genus Dalbergia that occur in S.-E. Asia. In the course of this study he has received much assistance from many friends and has been in hopes of incorporating the results of his investigation in a monograph of at least the Asiatic Species of this genus, so interesting from an economic and so difficult from a taxonomic point of view. Circumstances for the moment forbid ‘the accomplish- ment of this design. But while it is, at this time, impossible to provide a monograph of the genus which shall be, at least formally, complete, it is a pleasant duty to place at the disposal of members of this Society and of those who have so kindly assisted the writer, a compact review of the notes he has been able to make on collections that have been lent him for study in Calcutta or that he has been able to examine in Herbaria that he has visited. These notes, as embodied in this paper, take the form of a hand-list of the Asiatic species of the genus, with a fairly complete bibliography and a full citation of distribution so far as the specimens in the Collections examined by the writer are concerned. Except in the case of very well-known and obvious species the numbers of sheets, where numbers are given, have been quoted. In spite therefore of its formal incom- pleteness the list now prepared will probably be found useful, not only by those who may consult the collections on which the list is based, but by those who may be at work in Herbaria that have not yet been accessible to the writer. A list hke the present serves, moreover, another purpose ; it fulfils the desirable object of, in the words of a Russian proverb, “feeding the wolves and saving the sheep.” The Herbaria examined by the writer on the spot have been those of 1. Calcutta; 2. Kew; 3. British Museum; 4, The type Herbarium of Wallich; 5. the Herbarium of Linneus; 6. M. Drake del Castillo, Paris; 7. Peradeniya, Ceylon. The collections which have been entrusted to him for examination at Calcutta are those of 8. Herb. Saharanpur, lent by Mr. Duthie; 9. Herb. DeCandolle, Geneva, lent by Mr. DeCandolle, and 10. Herb. Boissier, Geneva, lent by Mr. Barbey ; 11. Herb. Beccari, Florence, lent by Sig. Beccari ; 12. Herb. Paris, lent by M. Bureau; 13. Herb. Leiden, lent by the late Prof. Suringar ; 14. Herb. Berlin, lent by Prof. Engler; 15. Herb. Buitenzorg, 40 D. Prain—The Asiatic species cf Dalbergia. [No. 1, lent by Dr. Treub; 16. Herb. Hong-Kong, lent by Mr. Ford. To all these friends and also to Mr. Bailey who -kindly sent Specimens of the only Dalbergia in the Brisbane Herbarium the writer wishes to express his grateful thanks. It may be explained that the classification adopted in this list should be considered more or less tentative. The chief point, at this stage, is to arrive if possible at something approaching a definite , idea of the various species. This, as will be seen from the quoted synonymy, has long been a desideratum; previous treatises have left many doubts both as to the limits of species and as to the incidence of names. That the present sketch is not without flaws in this respect goes without saying. The opportunities, however, which have been afforded the writer of examining the actual types of most of the doubtful forms have enabled him to settle definitely many if not all the old doubts; any new ones that may arise must be laid to his charge. The leading features of the present system of classification are (1) the reinstatement of Mr. Bentham’s very natural subgenus Triptolemea, and (2) the limitation of the subgenus Selenololium to those species that have thick corky pods. There is an obvious convenience in keeping alongside of each other three species so clearly and naturally allied as are D. reniformis, D. Kunstlert and D. falcata though, from the fact that the stamens of the first are iso-diadelphous while those of the second and apparently also the third are monadelphous, we have within this section a cleavage on another plane, corresponding exactly to the cleavage between Dalbergaria and Sissoa. The other species that have been occasionally placed in Selenolobium owing to their having hard woody pods, not obviously winged, but that do not have the ventral suture markedly widened in consequence of a corky thickening of the endocarp, are all species that occur on sea-shores or in tidal estuaries and are with hardly an exception confined to such localities. This raises a strong suspicion that the character is a cousequence of environment; it is at all events a character that adapts the pods for dispersal by floating. If this suspicion should prove correct the value of the character as a taxonomic one is greatly minimised. Such species have therefore been relegated to those sections in which their characters of corolla and stamens would naturally lead us to place them. Within the subgenus Sissoa a new section, that of the Unguiculate, has been tentatively recognised ; it promises to be a useful and appears to be a natural division. I. Sr1ssoa Benth. 1. Sissosx vere. 1. Daupereta Sissoo Roxb. Hort. Beng. 538 (1814); DC. Prodr. ae 1901.] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 41 ii. 416 (1825); Rowb.. Flor, Ind. iii, 223 (1832) ; Wall. Cat. 5850 (1832) ; W. &§& A. Prodr. i, 264 (1834); Grah. Cat. Bomb. Pl. 55 (1839); Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845) ; Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 40 (1860); Dalz. § Gibs. Bombay Flora, Suppl. 24 (1861); Bedd. Flor. Sylvat. t. 25 (1869); Stewart, Panjab Plants 65 (1869); Brandis, For, Flor. 149 (1874); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. iu, 281 (1876); Talbot, Bombay List 74 (1894) ; Gamble, Darjeeling List 28 (1896). | Witp in gravelly river beds along the foot of the Himalaya from Upper Assam. (Simons! Mann!) the Duars (Prain!) the Terai of Sikkim (Gamble! Clarke! etc.), and Nepal (Wallich !) to Dehra Dun (King !): ascending to 1000 feet in the Hastern Himalaya (Hooker /) and to 3000-4000 feet in the North-West Himalaya (Gamble! Clarke / Schlich!) and on the North-West frontier and Beluchistan (Stocks ! Lace !). Wild also in Merwara (Moir! Brandis !). Specimens from the Sitapahar Forest Reserve, Chittagong, (Hllis!) are probably from planted trees, CuLtivaTep everywhere in the plains of Northern, Central, Western and Southern India; occasionally as if wild in Coorg (Ho- henacker n. 785!) and the Nilgiris (Wight /). 2. DatperGia LATIFOLIA Roxb. Coromand. PI. ii. 7, t. 113 (1798) ; Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); DC, Prodr. ii. 416 (1825); Flor. Ind. ni, 221 (18382); Wall. Cat. 5852. (1832); W. § A. Prodr, i. 264 (1834) ; Grah. Cat. Bomb. Pl. 55 (1839); Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 240 (1845) ; Wight, Ic. t. 1156 (1852); Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 38 (1860) ; Dalz. § Gibs. Bomb. Flor. 77 (1861); Bedd. Flor. Syvlat. t. 24 (ezel. main fig.) (1869); Brandis For, Flor. 148 (1874) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 231 (1876); Talbot, Bombay List 74 (1894); Gamble, Dar- jeeling List 29 (1896). Rasputana: Merwara, Brandis! Aboo, King! Nepat: Maries! Sikkim: Hooker! Gamble! Cuota Naceur: fParasnath, Anderson ! Hooker ! Tundi Hills, Campbell! Hundrugagh, Prain! Palamau, Gamble ! N. Inpia: Jacquemont 731! 1886! Brenan: Hooker! Bunpstounn: .Hdge- worth. S. Inpia: Madras; Heyne! Nilgiris, Leschenault 246! Wight 930! Gamble! Ayamalais, near Coimbatore, Wight! Mercara, Metz (Hohenacher 622)! W. Inp1a: Kala Nadi, Ritchie! Concan; Stocks ! Law! Currivaten at Singapore, Ridley 8444! , 3. DaLBeRGIA EMARGINATA Road. Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); Flor. Ind. iii, 224 (1832); Vorgt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845). D. sissoides Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5876 (1852); W. § A. Prodr. i, 265 (1834); Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 39 (1860) ; Bedd, Trans. Linn. Soc. xxv. 216 (1865). D. javanica Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 132 (1855); Benth. Journ. Ininn. Soc. iv. Suppl. iv. 38 (1860). D. latifolia Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burm. i, 342 (1877); Koord. § Valet. Bijdr. 11, 77 (1895) nee Toxb. J. tke © Srna ede 42 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. I, D. latifolia var. sissoides Bedd. Flor. Sylvat. sub. t. 24 (1869); Bak. i Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. 11. 231 (1876). | ANDAMANS: probably north Island, Kyd (Ic. Roxb.) ! Java; Horsfield! Koorders! Heijer! 8. Inpia: Nilgiris, Wight 931! Segur, Clarke 11305! -Puilneys, near Kodaikanal, Bourne! Courtallam, Wight ! 4, DALBERGIA SACERDOTUM Prain. A tree, the young twigs soft, blackish, faintly puberulous. Leaves 20 cm. long, leaflets 9-11, ovate, base cuneate apex obtuse notched, membranous, finely reticulated, sparsely adpressed-puberulous on both surfaces, 6 ecm. long, 3 cm. wide; rachis 15 cm. long and petiolules 4mm. long finely puberulous. Flowers in terminal thyrsc:d panicles 8 cm. long 6 cm. wide, the peduncle, branches and slender pedicels rusty-puberulous; bracteoles lanceolate obtuse, membranous, deciduous. Calyx campanulate, teeth obtuse, the lowest as long as tube the others shorter. Petals short-clawed, standard orbicular hardly thickened at base. Stamens 10, monadelphous. Ovary shortly stipitate, glabrous except the stipe; ovules 4. Pod thinly coria- ceous, narrow-ligulate, tapering to the stipitate base, apex acute, glabrous, 3-seeded, 9 cm. long, 1 em. wide. Curna: Shanghai, Rev. pp. Hélot & d’Argy 75! The reverend gentlemen who collected the material on which this very distinct species is based, give its Chinese name as Te-Zii, i.e, “ Aloes-Wood.” Its nearest ally is D. Sissoo as regards pod and D. emarginata as regards foliage but it is very different from both. 5, DALBERGIA OBTUSIFOLIA Prain, D. ovata var. obtusifolia Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 231 (1876). D. glanea Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burm. 1. 343 (1877), nec Wail. Burma: Pegu, Kurz 1784! 2607 in part! Pakchoung, Brandis 228! Shan Hills; Madoe and elsewhere, King’s Collectors ! Lower Chindwin, Collectors of Forest Dept.! Hukung Valley, Grifith 1809! Curva: Yunnan, near Momien, J. Anderson ! Griffith notes this as a ‘‘ medium tree.’’ 6. DALBERGIA TONKINENSIS Prain. A small or medium-sized tree. Leaves 20-22 cm. long, leaflets 9-11, ovate, base rounded, apex shortly abruptly acuminate, firmly subcoriaceous, very sparingly puberulous when young, soon glabrous, 6-9 cm. long, 3-4 em. wide; rachis 13-15 em. long, and petiolules 4mm. long glabrous; stipnles small, tawny- — puberulous, deciduous, lowers “ white, fragrant,” in small, corymbose, axillary panicles 5 cm. long, 3°5 cm. wide. Pods firmly coriaceous, ovate or oblong, subacute, distinctly stipitate, 5 em. long when 1-seeded, 8 cm. long when 2-seeded, 2 cm. wide, distinctly reticulated opposite the seed. Seed reniform, compressed, 1 cm. Jong, 5 mm. wide. Dalbergia sp. Drake del Castillo, Journ, de Bot. v. 215 (1891). 1901.] == _-D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 43 Cocnin-Cuina: Tonkin, Hanoi; Balansa 2184! Curva: Hainan, B. 0. Henry 46! _ The absence of flowers, which are simply noted by the Rev. Henry as white and fragrant, renders it impossible to locate this species definitely. It appears, however, as if Mr. Drake del Castillo’s suggestion as to its affinity might be correct and that it is a Sissoa, near D. ovata and D, obtusifolia, 7. Daupercia ovata Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5854 (1832); Benth. in Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 40 (1860); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 231 (1876); Kurz, For, Flor. Brit. Burma i. 343 (1877). D. glauca Wall. Cat. 5862 (1832). Burma: Martaban, Wallich 5854! Moulmein, Wallich 5862! Fulconer 566! Parish 840! Beddome! Rangoon, Cleghorn! Yainway, Brandis 1185! Thoungyne, 3000 ft., Lobb! Pegu, Kurz 1785! 2607 in part! 2610! 2595! Cocuin-Cuina: route between Saigon and Bienhioa, Lefévre 320 ! Beddome notes this as a ‘‘ large tree.” 8. DALBERGIA FoLIACEA Wall. Cat. 5856 partly (1832); Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 41 (1860); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 232 (1876) ; Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 3847 (1877). Burma: Martaban, Wallich ! Palang Creek, Wallich! Pegu, Kurz 2602! Rangoon, Cleghorn 25! Shan Hills, Prazer 210! 233! Abdul Hug ! Tenasserim, Helfer 1806! Stam: borders of the Great Lake, Godefroy 686 ! Wallich’s n. 5865 is much mixed. Letter A. is a mélange of D, foliacea, D, stipulacea, D. candenatensis and D. volubilis; B. is a mixture, probably by mistake, of D. rimosa._and D. volubilis ; C. is D. foliacea; D.is D. foliacea; FE. is D. stipulacea. The mixture of D. rimosa with D. foliacea, which in most collections has taken place under B, has in Herb. De Candolle been made by Wallich under D. That it is in all probability a mistake in distributing may be admitted; D. rimosa does not occur in Southern Burma where D. foliacea grows. The other mistakes are mistakes of identification on Dr. Wallich’s part. 9. DAaLBERGIA YUNNANENSIS Franch. Pl. Delavay. 187 (1890). Cuina: Yunnan, near Tapintze, Delavay 654! 510! 2050! Yen-tze- hay, Delavay 3333! Mengtze, Henry 10205 ! ~ 40. Datperora vELUTINA Benth. var. typica Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng, Ixvi. 2.117 (1897). D. velutina Benth. Pl. Jungh. i. 255 (1854) ; Journ. Iinn. Soc. iv, Suppl. 43 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. il. 233 (1876); Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 348 (1877). D. stipulata Wall. Cat. 5868. (1832). Cassia timorensis H. f. § T. Herb. Ind. Or., partly: —~- | 7 Assam: Silhet, de Silva! Hooker & Thomson! Burma: Moulmein, 4d D.’ Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, Wallich ! Amherst, Brandis! Rangoon, Kurz! Pegu, Ku ure! a Helfer 1804! Mataya: Malacca, Maingay 548 ! ? . vaR. Maingayi Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. 1xvi. 2. 117 (1897). Burma: Mergui, Griffith 1798! Tenasserim, Helfer 1804! Mauaya: Malacca, Maingay 612! spices fiidley 6086! 5923! Borneo, Haviland 1444 ! Helfer 1804 in Herb. Berlin is typical D. velutina. In Herb. Paris the same number. is attached to a specimen of var, Maingayi. The Bornean plant may be varietally distinct. 1]. DaAtpercia BoRNEENSIS Prain. A long climber with perfectly glabrous branches. Leaves 8-12 cm. long, leaflets 7-9, oblong, obtuse, mucronulate, membranous, quite glabrous on both surfaces, 2°5 cm. long, 1:25 cm. wide, the terminal more cuneate at base and slightly larger than the others ; stipules large, sparingly puberulous or glabrous; rachis 8 cm. long and petiolules 2°5 mm. long glabrous. Flowers in lax lateral panicles with corymbose branches 6 cm. long, 4 cm. wide, the peduncles, branches and pedicels glabrous or very sparingly puberulous, bracts and 2 bracteoles at base of calyx narrowly subulate, pnberulous. Calyx 4 mm. long, puberulous, campanulate, base slightly gibbous, teeth acute subequal, upper pair wider than the three lanceolate lowest. Corolla white, petals with claws as long as calyx-tube, standard orbicular, emarginate, reflexed. Stamens usually 10, in one bundle slit along top. Ovary long-stipitate, glabrous, style subulate ; ovule usually solitary. Pod thinly coriaceous, pale straw-coloured, finely uniformly reticulated throughout, 1-seeded. Seed markedly reniform, 1:25 cm. long, 5 mm. wide, 1:2 mm. thick. Mataya: Borneo, near Kuching, Haviland 2889! Kalong, Haviland 2890 ! 12. DaLBEeRGIA brocwils Prain. A large climber, with slender, blackish, glabrous branches, branchlets occasionally hooked. Leaves 8-12 cm. long, leaflets 11-15, obovate-oblong, base cuneate, apex rounded retuse, thinly coriaceous, finely closely reticulate, sparsely adpressed- pubescent beneath, 2°5-3 cm. long, 1-1:25 cm. wide, rachis 7-9 cm. long and petiolules 2°56 mm. long glabrous or sparsely adpressed- pubescent. Flowers white, in lax few-flowered axillary panicles 5 cm. long, 3 cm. wide, rachis, branches and pedicels 3 mm. long puberulous. Calyx puberulous, campanulate, teeth triangular, obtuse, shorter than tube except the lowest subacute almost as long as tube. Petals with claws as long aS calyx-tube. Stamens 9,monadelphous. Ovary stipitate, glabrous except the puberulous stipe; ovules 2-3. Pod 1-2-seeded, thinly coriaceous, linear-oblong, 6°5 cra. long when 1-seeded. 9 cm. 1901.) D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 45 long when 2-seeded, 1:5 cm. wide, rere reticulated opposite the seeds. Cuina: Hupeh, Henry 3437! 4132! 4138 ! 4561! Szechuen; Ky- min-se, Farges 1076! Yunnan; Mengtze, Henry 10503 ! Farges gives the Chinese name as “ ''a-kang-kin-ten.” 13. DaLBERGIA cCULTRATA Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5861 (1832) ; Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 39 (1860); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 233 (1876); Kurz, For. Wlor. Brit. Burma i. 342 (1877). D. zeylanica Wall. Cat. 5847 B (1832), nec Roxburgh. Borma: Pegu, Kurz 1787! 2609! Wallich! McClelland ! Ravedin! Shan Hills, Collett 406! King’s Collector ! Prazer ! Tenasserim, Gallatly ! ‘Trogla, near the hills, Wallich 5847 B! SIAM: Radboerie, Teysmann 6027 ! | 2. Sussoe unguiculate, Standard with a long claw. 14. Daupercia Havinanpt Prain. A small tree with blackish, rugose, rusty-puberulous, thickish branvhlets. Leaves 7-10 cm. long, leaflets 1-3, when three the two lateral subopposed, ovate, obtuse or subacute, base truncate, firmly coriaceous, pubescent especially on the nerves above, velvety beneath, 5-8 cm. long, 2°5-4 cm. wide, secondary nerves 4—5 pairs, much curved forwards distinct beneath ; rachis 1°25- 25 cm. long, densely velvety as are the petiolules 3°5 mm. long. Flowers in short, clustered racemes 1'25-2'5 cm. long, springing from tufts of triangular, rusty-velvety bracts in axils of old leaves, lowest pedicels longest, slender, 5 mm. long, tawny-pubescent as are the peduncles ; bracts at base of pedicels solitary, ovate-lanceolate, 1°5 mm. long; persistent, the bracteoles below the calyx solitary, subulate, very small. Calyx campanulate, tawny-tomentose, 3°5 mm. long, teeth acute, half as long as tube. Corolla white, claws of petals as long as calyx- tube. Stamens 9, monadelphous, slit along upper side or occasionally (fide Haviland) in 2 bundles of 5 and 4 respectively. Ovary densely pubescent as is its stipe; ovules 2. Pod not seen. Borneo: Sarawak, near Kuching, Haviland 2894! 2895! 15. Daueercia Hupperru Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. lxvi. 2. 119 (1897). SINGAPORE; Hullett 626! 16. Daxpereia rostrata Grah, in Wall. Cat. 5867 (1832). D. Sis- ‘800 Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 128 (1855.) nec Roxb. D. pseudo-Sissoo Mig. Llor, Ind. Bat. i. 128 (1855); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. |xvi. 2. 118 (1897). D. Championii Thwaites, Enum. Pl. Zeylan. 95 (1860) ; Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 39 (1860); Buk. in Hook f. Flor. Brit. Ind, 11. 231 (1876); Trimen, Handbook of Ceylon Flora ii. 88 (1894), 46 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, D. nitida Zipp. Mss. in Herb. Lugd.-Bat. Wndospermum zeylanicum Champ. Mss. in Herb. Peradeniya. S. Inp1a: Tinnivelly, at foot of Ghauts on banks of the river Tam- braparni, Beddome 2424! Cryton: moist regions, 2000-4000 ft., Thwaites 761! Java: Blume! Zippel! Hasskarl! Borneo: Sarat Gunong Woh, Beccari 2845! Igau, Beccari 3906! 3908! Sungei Unpan- ang, Beccari 3379! Singkawang, Teysmann 7875! Kuching, Haviland © 2111! CeLesus: S.-H. Peninsula, at Lepo-Lepo, near Kandari, Beccari! Maray Peninsuta: Perak; Larut, Kunstler 3177! 3340! 3579! 4964! 6565! Scortechini 1348! Wray 2098! 2965! Penang; Govt. Hill, Curtis! Singapore; Bukit Mandai and elsewhere, Hullett ! Ridley ! 17. Datperoia Kinctana Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. \xvii. 2. 289 (1898). Burma: Kachin Hills, Skaik Mokim! 18. DatperGciA Henryana Prain. A large woody climber with Baubes pubescent young branches. Leaves 12 cm. long, leaflets 4-5, ovate, acute, base cuneate or rounded, coriaceous, glabrous above, softly densely pubescent beneath, terminal the largest 7 cm. long, 3°5 cm. wide ; rachis 6 cm. and petiolules 3:5 mm. rusty-puberulous. Flowers white, in loose panicles 10 em. long, with rusty-pubescent main-rachis and branches 3 cm. long; pedicels rusty, 3 mm. long; bracts and bracteoles small, ovate, rusty-pubescent. Calyw campanulate, densely rusty-pubes- cent, 4°55 mm. long, teeth subequal triangular. Pelals with claws as long as calyx. Stamens 9, monadelphous. Ovary pubescent, with long pubescent stipe ; ovules usually 2. Pod not seen. Cutna: Yunnan, at Mengtze, Henry 11248! 19. Daxpercia Bentuamt Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvii. 2. 289 (1898). A woody climber, branches black, glabrous. Leaves 12-14 em. long; leaflets 5-7, ovate or oblong-elliptic, narrowed to the obtuse or retuse apex, base cuneate or rounded, coriaceous, glabrous above, glauces- cent and finely adpressed-puberulous beneath, terminal the largest 5 cm. long, 2.5 cm. wide; rachis 8 cm. long and petiolules 4 mm. long glabrous, . Flowers in short, axillary, rusty-pubescent panicles 3°5 cm. long, branches 1 cm, long, pedicels 3 mm. long; bracts and_ bracteoles ovate, deciduous, rusty-pubescent. Calyx campanulate, densely rusty- tomentose, 4 mm. long, the 3 lower teeth narrow-ovate, rather longer than the two wider upper. Petals with claws as long as calyx. Stamens 9, monadelphous. Ovary glabrous, stipitate; ovules usually 3. Pod glabrous, long stipitate, thinly coriaceous, ligulate, 1-2-seeded, 5-7 cm. long, 2 cm. wide, faintly reticulate opposite the compressed, reniform seed. D. rubiginosa Benth., Flor. Hongkong. 93 (1861) non Roxb. . Cuina: Hongkong, Hance 1053! Wilford! Wright 140! Ford! Seemann ! Bodinier ! Urquhart ! Harland! 1901. | D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 47 20. Daxperaia Garpnertana Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv, Suppl. 42 (1860); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 444 (1897). D. congesta Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 232 (1876) partim, nec Benth. S. Inpia: Nilgiris, Gurdner! Metz (Hohenacker 1591)! Wight 824! G. Thomson! Clarke 11129! Gamble 13176! 14501! Perrottet 469 ! 21. Dapercia RuBIGINOSA Roxb. Coromand. Pl. 1. 9,6. 115 (1798) ; Hort. Beng. 98 (1814); DO. Prodr. ii. 416 (1825); W. & A. Prodr. i, 265 (1834); Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 43 (excl. ref. China) (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind, ii. 232 (1876) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng, |xvi. 2. 443 (1897). W. Inpia: Concan, Stocks! Wight 823! 924! Canara, Talbot 70! 1182! 1867! 3594! 22, Datpereia concesta Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5872 (1832); W. & A. Prodr, i. 265 (1834) ; Benth. in Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 43 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii, 232 (excl. syn. D. Gard- neriana) (1876). - S. Inp1a: Coonoor, 6000 ft. Brandis! Gamble 11694! Prain! - Upper Borma: Chin Hills, Prazer ! 23. Daxpercia DENSA Benth., Lond. Journ. Bot. ii. 217 (1843) ; Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 43 (1860); Flor. Austral. 1. 271 (1864). Matay ArcuipeLaco: Amboina, Teysmann 5120! Key Islands, Ke- teil at Tual, Beccart! New Guinea; without locality, Hinds! Island of Jobie, Barclay! Kaiser Wilhelmsland, Hollrung 84! 174! 477! AUSTRALIA: Queensland, von Mueller! Bailey! Possession Island, R. Brown! Prince of Wales Island, R. Brown ! Torres Straits, Moseley ! Albany Island, Hill! 24. DaLBERGIA BURMANICA Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xvi, 2. 448 (1897). Burma: Ruby Mines District, King’s Collectors! Chin Hills, C. R. Dun 50! 25. Darperera Janerit Buerck Mss. in Herb. Bogor. A large shrubby climber with glabrous branches. Leaves 5-8 cm. long; leaflets 15-23, ovate-oblong, base faintly obliquely cuneate, apex rounded slightly emarginate, chartaceous, green above slightly glaucescent beneath, finely sparsely adpressed-pubescent on both surfaces, 3 em. long, 1:25 cm. wide, rachis 8-10 em. long, and petiolules 4 mm. long glabrous. Flowers in congested axillary panicles 3 cm. long, 2 cm. wide, rachis and branches puberulous, pedicels 3mm. long, puberulous ; bracts and 2 bracteoles under the calyx ovate, puberulous. Calyx campanu- late, glabrescent, 4 mm. long, teeth short, triangular, obtuse. - Corolla white, 8 mm. long, claws of petals as long as calyx-tube, standard ovate, reflexed. Stamens 10, monadelphous, sheath slit along upper side. 48 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [ No. 1, Ovary glabrous, long-stalked, style subulate; ovules 2. Pod narrow- oblong, ie firmly coriaceous, with rounded apiculate tip, Cishpehly stipitate, usually 2-seeded, 5-6 cm. long, 1:25 cm. wide. | Mataya: Key Islands, Warburg 20312! Key Toewal, Jaher ! dale cult. in Hort. Bogor, introduced from Key Toewal ! Most nearly related to D. polyphylla and D. tamarindifolia but very diatinct from both. 26. DaLBERGIA POLYPHYLLA Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv, Suppl. 44 ealcuding the Bornean plant (1860). D. polyphylla Benth. Pl. Jungh. i 256, in part ; the Philippine plant only (1854). _ Privippines: Luzon, Cuming 1164! Vidal 2589 ! Specimens of this in Herb. Berol, and Herb. De Candulle have been kindly lent for study; the writer has also seen those at Kew and the British Museum. The species is a very distinct one, nearest to D, tamarindifolia, The two plants referred to the same species at different times by Mr, Bentham are both Triptolemez, one is D. Millettii Benth., a Chinese species, the other is D. PhS BL, a Malayan one. Vidal gives the vernacular name as “ Pasa? 27. Dapercia acacizFoLIA Dalz. in Kew Journ. ii, 37 (1850). D. tamarindifolia var. acacizfolia Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 235 (1876). Western Inpta: Concan, Law! N. Canara, Talbot 3588! Tinni- velly Hills, Nazdoo! fe A very distinct species, differing from D. tamarindifolia, to which it is most closely allied, in its foliage, the leaflets being glaucous beneath; and in’ its larger, firmly coriaceous pod. 28. DaLBerGiA MALABARICA Prain.: A shrubby climber with densely rusty-pubescent young branches. Leaves 9-10 cm. long; leaflets 21-31, thinly pubescent above, densely tomentose heineSith ented elliptic-oblong, hardly or not obliqne at the base, 1:25 cm. long, 6-7 mm. wide, moderately firm ; rachis 8-9 em. long densely pubescent, petiolules very short and lanceolate stipules densely rusty-pubescent. Flowers with the leaves, in congested, sessile, axillary corymbs 1°5 cm. long, 6 mm. wide; peduncles densely pubescent, pedicels glabrous; - bracts triangular-ovate, persistent, and bracteoles 2 below calyx lanceolate, persistent, pubescent. Calyx campanulate, glabrous except on the margins of the teeth, 4 mm, long, teeth nearly as long as tube, the two upper connate obtuse, the others lanceolate acute. Corolla white, 8 mm, long, claws of petals as long as calyx-tube, standard ovate, entire, reflexed. Stamens 9, monadelphous. Ovary glabrous except along the upper suture, stipe distinct pubescent; style filiform; ovules 2. Pod: ovate- oblong, very thinly coriaceous, glabrous, long stipitate, 8 em.) - 1901. ] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 49 long, 1°5 cm, wide, distinctly reticulately veined especially opposite the seed. D. tamarindifolia var. pubescens Bak. in Hook. f, Flor Brit. Ind, ii. 235 (1876). Western Inpra: Concan, Stocks ! Canara, Talbot 408 ! 3665! Quilon, Wight! S. Tinnivelly, Beddome ! Though placed with D, tamarindifolia by Mr. Baker this is very distinct by its leaflets, which are hardly if at all oblique at the base, and by its different pods. 29. DALBERGIA TAMARINDIFOLIA Rowb. ort. Beng. 53 (1814) ; Flor. Ind. iii. 233 (in part) (1832) ; Wall. Cat. 5870 (1832) ; Wight Icon, t. 242 (excl. fruit) (1840) ; Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Caleutt. 241 (1845); Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 131 (1855); Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 44 (1860); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 234 (1876) ; Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 348 (1877); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. |xvi. 2. 117 (1897). D. rufa Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5364 (1832). D. multijuga Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5865 (1832); Zoll. et Mor. Verzeichn. 2 (1845). D. Blumei Hassk. Cat. Hort. Bogor. 284 (1844) ; Pl. Jav. Rar. 400 (1848), Himarara: Nepal, Wallich! Sikkim, Hooker! Lister! Assam: Brahmaputra Valley, Watt! Simons! Peal! Jenkins! Mann! Clarke ! Silhet, Gomez! Cuirracona: Kodala, King’s Collector! Burma: Tenas- serim, Wallich! Griffith! Helfer! Falconer! Anpamans: S. Andaman, common; Barren Island, Prawn! Cuina: Yunnan, Taping Valley, J. Anderson! Manaya: Langkawi, Curtis! Perak, Scortechini! Wray ! Kunstler! Penang, Wallich! Malacca, Maingay! Derry! Sumatra, Korthals! Forbes! Java, Horsfield ! Ploem! Zollinger ! Borneo, Korthals ! Motley 262! Creagh ! Haviland ! Puitippines: Luzon, Vidal 250! The native name given for this by Hasskarl is Aroy Tjetjereha or “climbing Tamarind.” In Hort. Bogor at present this name connotes D. phyllanthoides Bl., which is in cultivation there under the name D. littoralis Hassk. 3. Sissoxe unguiculate Pseudoselenolobiex. 30. DALBERGIA CANDENATENSIS Prain. Cassia candenatensis Dennst. Schl. zum Hort. Malabar. 12 (1818). Dalbergia torta Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5873 (1832); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 120 (1897). D. monosperma Dalz. Hook. Journ. Bot. ii. 36 (1850); Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 182 (1855); Benth. Journ. Linn Soc. iv. Suppl. 48 (1860); Dalz. & Gibs. Bomb. Flor. 78 (1861); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 337 (1876); Talbot, Bombay List 75 (1894). Drepanocarpus monospermus Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burm. i. 337 (1877).—Karin Tagera Rheede, Hort. Malabar. vi. 25. W. Inpra: Concan, Stocks! Law! Malabar, Rheede (Ic.)! Quilon, Wight 820! Cryton: Pandure, ‘Trincomali and Kodiyar, Thwaites ! Trimen! Buncau: Sundribuns, Clarke 33423! Heinig! ANDAMANS: J. 1. 7, 50 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, Narcondam, Prain ! S. Andaman, very common, King’s Collectors ! BurMa : Amherst, Falconer! Kalian river, Martaban, Wallich! Mergui, Griffith 1799! Cocuin-Cuina : between Saigon and Cholen, Lefévre 132! Annam, Haton, Godefroy 753! Tonkin, Balansa 1202! Mataya; Langkawi, Curtis 2868! Penang, Wallich 5873! Curtis 220! Perak, coast, Scortechini 1099 ! Wray 2502! Malacca, atTanjong Kling, Ridley 3312! Singapore, Wallich ! Kurz! 1. Anderson ! Kunstler 66! Ridley 5576! Wichura 656! Sumatra ; Indrapura, Korthals! Miller 1778! Biliton, at Blimbong, 'eysmann ! Borneo; Sarawak, Matong, Beccart 2526! Igau, Beccari 3905! Bintulu, Haviland 2892! Celebes; S.-H. Peninsula, Lepo-Lepo near Kandari, Beccari ! Moluccas; Amboina, Forster! Ceram Laut, Forster ! Warburg 20311! New Guinea; Forbes! Puitippines: Luzon, Batangos, Cuming 1542! Vidal 2605! Manila, Cuming 1541! Cuina: Little Hongkong, Ford! Hongkong, Hance! Potynesta: Fiji, Seemann 128! Tonga Isds. at Vavau, Crootz 39! N. Caledonia, Pancher 44! Deplanche 336! Veillard 2927! Avustratia: Cape York, Damel! Rockingham Bay, Dallachy ! Port Darwin, Schultz 744! Miquel reports the species also from Bangka; it is curious that it has never apparently been collected in the Sunda Archipelago or in Java. The only specimens from Java that I have seen are from plants cultivated in the Buitenzorg Garden Hort. Bogor. nn. 854! 2692! Godefrey gives the Annamese name as ‘‘ Cayme miik” and the Cambodian as ‘ Bai tuk.” 31. DaALBERGIA MENOEIDES Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng.. lxvi. 2, 120 (1897) and 453 (1897). Mataya: Perak, Scortechini 1392 ! II. Datserearia Benth. 4. Dalbergarieex. 32. DaLBERGIA GLOMERIFLORA Kurz, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xlii. 2. 70 (1873); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 236 (1876); Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 345 (1877). Burma: Prome, Kurz 2611! 33. DALBERGIA CANA Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5859 (1832); Kurz in Journ. As. Soc. Beny. xlii. 2.70 (1873) Bak. in Hook. f. Flor Brit. Ind. ii. 237 (1876) ; Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i, 344 (1877); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng.. Ixvi. 2. 450 (1897). D. purpurea Wail. Cat. 5869 (1832); Benth. in Journ, Linn, Soc. iv, Suppl. 46 partly (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 235 partly (1876). Burma: ‘Tenasserim, Wallich 5859! 5869! Pegu, Brandis! Kurz 1779! 2601 34, Daupercia Kurzit Prain, Jowrn. As. Soc. Beng. lxvi. 2, 450 (1897), D. purpurea Kurz, Journ, As. Soc. Beng. xlv. 2. 279 each. cit. 1901.] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 51 Wall. Cat, 5869 (1875); For. Flor. Brit. Burmai. 344 (1877) ; not of Wall. Burma: Pegu, McClelland 8! Brandis 1170! Kurz 1780! 1783! 2603 ! 2603! Kalay Hills, Prazer! Shan Hills, Alpin ! Ruby Mines Dist., King’s Collector ! 35. DALBERGIA PANICULATA Rozb. Cor. Pl. ii. 8, t. 114 (1798) ; ; Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); DC. Prodr. ii. 417 (1825); Spreng. Syst. iii. 198 (1826) ; Roxb. Flor. Ind. iii. 227 (1832) ; Wall. Cat. 5848 partly (1832) ; W. § A. Prodr. i. 265 (1834); Grah., Cat. Bomb. Pl. 55 (1839); Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 45 (1860) ; Dulz. § Gibs. Bomb. Flor. 78 (1861); Bedd. Flor. Sylvat. t. 88 (1869) ; Brandis, For. Flor. 151 (1874) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 236 (1876); Ualbot, Bombay List 75 (1894); Prain, Journ. As, Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 449 (1897). D. nigrescens Kurz, Pegu Rep. App. A 48 (1875); For. Flor, Brit. Burma i. 346 (1877). S. Inpia: Circars, Roxburgh ! Mysore, Heyne! G. Thomson! Columala, Wight! Cuddapah, Naidoo! Gamble 10867! Travancore, Lawson ! W, Inpia: Concan, Gibson ! Stocks ! Canara, Talbot! Burma: Pegu, Hyre ! — Kurz 2618! Upper Burma, Griffith 1810! King’s Collectors ! J. Anderson ! Shan Hills, King’s Collectors ! 36. Datpereta sericea G. Don, Gen. Syst. 11. 375 (1832). D. robusta Wall. Cat. 5849 A (1832); not of Roxb. D. hircina Wall. Cat. 5871 B (1832) ; Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 46 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor, Brit. Ind. ii, 236 (1876) ; Gamble, Darjeeling List 29 (1896) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xvi, 2. 449 (1897); not of Ham. D. stenocarpa Kurz, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xliv. 2, 205 (1875); Buk. in Hook, f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 238 (1876). D. emarginata Royle Mss. in Herb. Kew; not of Roxb. D, assamica Benth. Journ, Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 45 in part (as to the Subsewalik locality only) (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind, ii. 235 partly (1876). Himataya: Garhwal, King ! Duthie } | Kamaon, Strachey § Winter- bottom 3! T. Thomson! Wallich! Royle! King! Duthie! MacKinnon ! Nepal, Wailich! Hamilton! Sikkim, Gamble! Lister! Gammie! Clarke! Prain! Bootan, Grifith 1812! Gamble! Alipur Duars, Heawood ! Two names were indirectly made available for this very distinct species by Dr. Wallich. These are D. robusta Wall., given by that botanist under the mistaken belief that this was the same as Roxburgh’s D. robusta which is a Derris, and _D. hireina used under the mistaken impression that this is what Hamilton intended by D. hircina, Though aware that this also was a mistake, Mr. Bentham has chosen the latter as the preferable name. Fortunately, though this was not known to Mr. Bentham, there is another name, D. sericea G. Don, which dates from the same year and has the advantage of being accompanied by a Eevanipeents it therefore supersedes both the others. Mr. Baker has apparently seen an example of Wall. Cat. 6849 A which ise 02 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. J, D. lanceolaria Linn. f.; the writer has not seen one. In any case Wall. Cat. 5 A at the Linnean Society’s rooms (Wallich’s type Herbarium) is D. sericea. Dalbergia hircina Ham., as written up by Hamilton himself (in Herb. Brit. Museum), on two specimens collected at Darhora 12th Apl., 181], and at Sukhyia 23rd Aug., 1809, is D. lanceolaria. The type of D. sericea G. Don, as shown by a specimen from Herb. Lambert named by G. Don himself, and now in the British Museum collection, was also collected by Hamilton. On this Hamilton has noted “Dalbergia? A tree; Cheria ghaut Hills 31-3-1802.” It is this that has, in Wall. Cat. 5871 B, been erroneously written up by Wallich as D. hircina. 37. DALBERGIA LANCEOLARIA Linn. f. Suppl. 316 (1781) ; DC. Prodr. i, 417 (1825); Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 45 (1860); Dalz. & Gibs., Bomb. Flor. 78 (1861); Brandis, For. Flor. 151 (1874) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. 11. 235 (1876) ; Talbot, Bombay List 74 (1894). D. frondosa Rowb. Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); DC. Prodr. ii. 417 (1825) ; Roxb. Flor, Ind. ii. 226 (1882); Wall. Cat. 5855 (1832); W. & A. Prodr. i. 266 mainly (1834); Grah., Pl. Bombay 55 (1839) ; Wight Icones t. 266 (1840) ; Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845); Bedd., Flor. Sylvat. t. 88 (1869). D. zeylanica Rowb. Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); Flor. Ind. iii. 228 (1832); Wall. Cat. 5847 A (1832); Vozgt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845). D. arborea Heyne in Roth. Nov. Sp. 330 (1821) ; DC. Prodr. ii. 417 (1825), D. hircina Ham. in Wall. Cat. 5871 A (1832). N. Inp1a: Hardwar, Hamilton! King! T. Thomson! Darhora, Hamilton ! Sukhiya, Hamilton! Rajputana, Abu, King ! Ajmir, Jacque- mont! Moir! Brandis! C. India; Jerdon! Chota jNagpur, Gamble ! Haines! Campbell! Clarke! Wood! “Prain! Behar, Hooker! Kurz! W. Inpia: Concan, Stocks! Law! Canara, Talbot! Belgaum, Ritchie ! S. Inpra: Madras, Heyne! Roxburgh! Mysore, G. Thomson! Vellore, Gamble! Kurnool, Gamble ! Tellicherry, Metz (Hohenacker 723)! Wight 927! Cottulam, Leschenault 191! Shevarois, Perrottet ! Ceyton: Thwaites 1496! Cuntrvatep at Bourbon, Richard ! Letter A of Wallich’s Dalbergia robusta, reduced to this by Mr. Baker, is D. sericea G. Don (=D. hircina Benth. and Bak. not of Ham.). Wight and Arnott have mainly D, lanceolaria under D. frondosa, but one of their quoted sheets, Wight n. 928, is D. paniculata. Leschenault in Herb. Paris gives the native name of this as “ Toda cotty morum.” 38. Datpereia assamica Benth, Pl. Junghuhn. i. 255 (1854) ; Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 45 partly, the Assam locality only (1860); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 235 partly, the Assam locality only (1876) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. 1xvi. 2. 449 (1897). D. lanceolaria Gamble, Darjeeling List 29 (1896) not of Linn. f. Sikkim: Narchu Valley Prawn! Prain’s Collector! Assam: Brahma- putra Valley, Grifith K.D. 1803! Hooker § Thomson! Masters ! Peal! Watt ! Jenkins 54! - 1901.] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 53 This is a fine tree, known in Assam as ‘“ Medeloa.” The Subsiwalik specimens collected by Edgeworth and included in this species by Bentham prove, on examina- tion, to belong to D. sericea G. Don. (=D, robusta Wall. not Roxb. =D, hircina Benth. not Ham.). 39. DaLBEeRGIA HUPEANA Hance, Journ. Bot. xx. 5 (1882); Forbes § Hemsl., Journ. Linn. Soc. xxiii. 198 (1887). Cuina: Ichang ; Walters! Henry 3670! 4558! 3112! 4932! Ningpo ; Oldham! Cooper! Faber! Kwangtung; Sampson! Ford! Carles 556! Nant’o, Carles 287! E. Szechuen; Farges 1213! Yang-tze-kiang, Faber ! This Farges terms ‘‘ Tan-mou-chou,” the wood being “ Tchan-Keou.” Cooper says “ Paitan” is the local, “white Chandan” the classical name. Henry, on n. 3670 at Kew, calls it the Tan tree. 40. Datsereta Wart Clarke, Journ. Linn. Soc. xxv. 17, t. 5 (1889) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xvi. 2. 451 (1897). Manirur: Metaiphum, 5000 ft, Watt 6830! Mayung, 3500 ft, Clarke 42034! 41. Danpercia OLiveRt Gamble ex Prain in Journ. As. Soc. Beng, Ixvi. 2. 451 (1897). D. paniculata Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burm. i. 345 (1877) not of Roxb. D. purpurea Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 235 partly and as to Pegu specimens only (1876); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 449 (1897). Burma: Pegu, Kurz1781! 2604! Wuntho and Bhamo, J. W. Oliver ! Collectors of Forest Dept. ! The recent receipt of fruiting specimens and oldish leaves of “ Tamalan” (D. Oliveri Gamble) shows that this tree is the same as the “ Tabou-ben” of Kurz’s Flora (D. paniculata Kurz, not of Roxb.) and further settles finally a very troublesome question that had arisen regarding the incidence of the name D. purpurea. In the Linnean Society’s Herbarium (Wallich’s type herbarium) and in all the other herbaria seen by me D. purpurea Wall. is = D. cana Grah., except at Kew - where there is mixed with D. cana some D. volubilis. Bentham’s D. purpurea, which is based on that material, is thus a mixture of D. cana and D. volubilis, while to these species Mr. Baker, in the F.B.I, has added a third in the shape of D. paniculata Kurz, non Roxb. Thewriter’s D. purpurea, in this Journal (Ixvi. 2. 449) rejected both D. purpurea Wall. and D. volubilis, and is restricted to Kurz’s plant, for which in any case therefore a new name would have had to be provided had this not already fortunately been done by Mr. Gamble. 42. Datperaia Prazert Prawn, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 452 (1897), Burma: Shan Hills at Koni, Prazer! Stam: Teysmann 52! Very closely related to D. Oliveri, “ Tamalan” or ‘‘ Tabon-ben ” and to D., stipu- lacea ** Donk-ta-loung-nway,’” having the pods of the former but in foliage more resembling the latter. D4 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, 43. Daupercta Hemsteyi Prain, Journ, As. Soc. Beng. xvi. 2. 450 (1897). Burma: Shan Hills, Collett ! Prazer ! King’s Collector! 44, DatperctA Batans&# Prain. A tree 20-30 feet high. Leaves 13-18 cm. long, leaflets 13-15, ovate-oblong, obtuse or retuse, persistently puberulous beneath, chartaceous, finely reticulately veined, 3-4 cm. long, 2 cm. wide, rachis 10-15 cm. and petiolules 4 mm. long puberu- lous; stipules lanceolate. flowers in lax axillary panicles 8-10 cm. long, 5 cm. wide, with glabrescent peduncles and slender puberulous pedicels, bracts ovate-lanceolate and 2 lanceolate obtuse bracteoles under the calyx very caducous. Calyx campanulate, the upper teeth subconnate obtuse and lateral subacute half as long as tube, lowest lanceolate as long as tube. Corolla white, standard orbicular 2-callose at base. Stamens in 2 phalanges of 5 each. Ovary densely pubescent ; ovules usually 3. Pod long-stipitate, tapering to both ends, usually 1-, rarely 2-3-seeded, coriaceous, reticulated opposite the seed, 8-12 cm. long, 3°5 cm. wide. Seeds subreniform, compressed. D. lanceolaria Hemsl., Journ. Linn. Soc. xxiii. 193 (1887) ; Drake del Castillo, Journ, de Bot. v. 214 (1891) not of Linn. f. Cuina: Kwangtung, Sampson ! Ford ! Kiu-Kiang, Shearer ! Millett ! Tonkin: Mt. Bavi, Balansa 2289 ! 45. DALBERGIA VOLUBILIS Roxb. Cor. Pl. i. 48, t. 191 (1798) ; Hort. Beng. 98 (1814); DC. Prodr. u. 417 (1825); Spreng. Syst. iii. 193 (1826) ; Rowb. Flor. Ind. iii. 231 (1832); Wall. Cat. 5874 (1832) ; W. & A. Prodr. i. 265 (1834) ; Grah., Cat. Bomb. Pl. 55 (1889) ; Benth. Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 46 (1860); Dalz. § Gibs. Bomb. Flor. 78 (1861) ; Brandis, For. Flor. 152 (1874); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. i, 235 (1876) ; Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burm. 1. 346 (1877) ; Talbot, Bombay List 75 (1894) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. lxvi. 2. 114 (1897). D. confertiflora Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 41 partly, both the Oudh and the Concan plants (1860) not of Benth. in Pl. Junghuhn. ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 233 partly (1876) ; Talbot, Bombay List 75 (1894). D. foliacea Wall. Cat. 5856 partly (1832). D. purpurea Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 46 partly (1860); Bak. in Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 235 partly (1876) not of Wullich. D. stipulacea Gamble, Darjeeling List 29 partly (1896) not of Roxb. | N. Inpra: Oudh, Wallich! Duthie! W. Duars, Gamble 6683! Terai, Anderson! Clarke! Kamaon Bhabar, 1000 ft., Strachey and Winterbottom 2! Behar, Kurz! Campbell! Ball! Chota Nagpur, 1. Anderson! Thomson ! Wood! Clarke! C.Inp1a: Sagor, Jerdon ! C. Pro- vinces, Duthie! W. Inpia: N. Canara, Yalbot! Concan, Stocks! Malabar, Stocks! S. Canara, Metz (Hohenacker 561)! 8, Ivpia : Circars, 1901. ] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 55 Roaburgh ! Bolimpati, Wight ! Travancore, Lawson ! Kurnool, Gamble ! Ganjam, Gamble! Assam : Goalpara, Clarke ! Garo Hills, Watt ! Currra- gone: Thanacheri, etc, Hooker § Thomson! Gamble! Lister! King’s Collector! Burma: Chin Hills, Prazer ! King’s Collector! Kachin Hills, Prain’s Collector ! Bhamo, J. Anderson! Shway Yoe, J. Anderson! Pegu, Brandis! Kurz! Shan Hills, Collett! Prazer ! King’s Collectors ! Tenas- serim, Wallich 5856 B! Cleghorn! Gallatly! Helfer 1805! Anpamans : S. Andaman, very common, King’s Collectors ! 46. DALBERGIA FERRUGINEA Roxb. Hort. Beng. 98 (1814) ; Flor. Ind. iii, 223 (1832) ; Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 1. 183 (1855). D. luzonensis Vog. Nov. Act. Nat. Cur. xix. Suppl. i. 33 (1843); Benth, Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 48 (1860). D. penduliflora Blume ex Mig. loc. cit. (1855). D. stipulacea Benth. loc, cit., partly (1860) not of Rob. Manaya: Brit. N. Borneo, Bangi island at Pankalan, Fraser 274 ! Moluccas, at Tidore, Christian Smith! Teysmann 5186! Buru, Buitenzorg Collectors! Ceram, Teysmann 5043! Foerster! Ceram Laut, Warburg 20309! New Guinea; Dutch N.G. at Sigar, near the coast, Warburg 20813! Andai, Beccari 554! 693! Patuierines: Manilla, Meyen! Sawar, F. Jagor 945! Luzon, Vidal 2598! Panay, Vidal 2606! 47. DALBERGIA STIPULACEA Rowb., Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); Flor. Ind. iii. 233 (1832); Wight, Icones t. 453 (1840); Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845); Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 1. 183 (1855) ; Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 47 (1860); Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 237 excluding the syns. D. ferruginea and I). rostrata (1876); Kurz, For. Fler. Brit. Burm. i. 346 (1877); Gamble, Darjeeling List 29 (1896) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. \xvi. 2. 451 (1897). D. tingens Ham. in Wall. Cat. 5860 (1832). D. cassioides Wall. Cut. 5863 (1832). -D. livida Grah. in Wall. Gat. 5866 (1832). Eastern Himanaya: Sikkim, lower Hills and Terai, Hooker ! Kurz! Anderson! Clarke! Gamble! King! Prain! Bootan and Duars, Gamble ! Lister! Haines! Assam: Bralhmaputra Valley, Hamilton! Jenkins! Simons! Clarke! Mann! Fisher! Peal! Naga Hills, King’s Collector ! Watt ! Prazer! Prain’s Collector! Garo Hills, Clarke! Khasia Hills; Hooker §& Thomson! Clarke! Manipur, Watt! Silhet, deSilva! Clarke ! Cuitracona: Kodala, King’s Collector! Borma: Kachin Hills, Prain’s Collector! Hukung, Girifith! Chin Hills, Prazer ! Kalay Hills, Prazer ! Shan Hills, King’s Collector ! Pegu, McClelland ! Kurz! Brandis ! Tenas- serim, Wallich ! Gomez! Brandis! Helfer ! Gallatly ! Cleghorn ! Falconer ! This species does not, as Mr. Baker supposes, extend to Malaya. The reason for the belief was the tentative reduction to this species by Mr. Bentham of the very different D. ferruginea Roxb., which was based on Moluccan specimens. OD. rostrata Grah., also reduced here, is the very different species described by Thwaites as 56 D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [ No. ; D. Championii and previously described by Miquel as D. pseudo-8issoo and also as D. Sissoo. I1I. Triproremea Benth. o. Triptolemesx vere. 48. DALBERGIA CONFERTIFLORA Benth., Pl. Junghuhn. 1. 255 (1854) ; Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 41 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 233 (1876); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. \xvi. 2. 114 (1897). D. paniculata Wall. Cat. 5848 partly (1832) ; letters E.G.I. D. rubig- inosa Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 347 (1877) not of Roab. Bastern Himantaya: Daphla Hills, Lester! Assam: Khasia Hills, Simons! Silhet, Wallich! Cuirracona: at Kasalong, Lister! Clarke 19744! Thandacheri, King’s Collector! Burma: Pegu, Kurz! AnDAMANS: S. Andaman, very common, 1. H. Man! King’s Collectors ! The Western India locality cited for this species by Bentham and Baker is erroneous ; all the specimens from the Concan so named by them are D, volubilis, A9. Daupereia Cottetti Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 445 (1897). 7 Burma: Shan Hills, Collett 591! 7238 ! The writer has erroneously described this as a tree ; it isa large climber. 50. Danpercia mimosoipes Franch. Pl. Delavayane 187 (1890). D. Milletti Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 446 (1897) hardly of Benth. D. tamarindifolia Roxb. Flor. Ind, iii. 228 im part (1832) ; Wight, Icon. t. 242 as to fruit only (1840). Kuasita Hills; at 1-2000 ft. elev., Mann! Shampung, 4000 feet, Collett ! Sohra, 4500 feet, Gallatly ! Clarke 18845! Maoksandram, 4000 feet, Clarke 42875! Cuina: Yunnan, in woods above Tapintze, Delavay 1982! Szechuen, near Tatchieulu, 9000 feet, Pratt 275. This is very near D. Milletti from Hongkong and was in 1897 referred to that species by the writer. An opportunity, most obliging furnished by MM. Burean and Franchet, of examining the type of M. Franchet’s D. mimosoides shows that the Khasia plant is exactly the same as the Yunnan and Szechuen one and that the latter is probably best treated as specifically distinct from D. Milletti. It may be mentioned in passing that Dalbergia Delavayi Franch., also kindly lent for study, does not belong to this genus but is a Cladrastis, C. Delavayi, hardly different from C. sinensis Hemsl. 51. DALBERGIA STENOPHYLLA Prain. A climber with lenticelled glabrous branches. Leaves 6-8 cm. long; leaflets 30-35, small, linear- oblong, obtuse, glabrous above, finely sparingly adpressed-puberulous beneath, rather close-set, 1 cm. long, 3 mm. wide, rachis 55-7 cm. long and very short petiolules glabrous. Flowers small, secund, in axillary panicled cymes 3-5 cm. long, 1°5-4.cm. wide, peduncle, branches and short pedicels finely puberulous, bracts and 2 bracteoles at base of calyx 1901. ] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 57 embracing lower third of tube ovate, persistent, small. Calyx 2°5 mm. long, campanulate, teeth short, obtuse, one-third as long as tube except the lower acute two-thirds the length of tube. Corolla white, 5 mm. long, claws of petals short. Stamens 9, monadelphous. Ovary stipitate, glabrous ; ovules 3. Pod thinly coriaceous, narrowly oblong or ligulate, rarely ovate-acute; 2- or l-seeded, 2-3cm. long if one-seeded, 5 cm. long if 2-seeded; 1 cm. wide; rather distinctly reticulated throughout, not indurated opposite the seed. Cuina: Hupeh, Henry 1355! 1950! 3852! 41385! 6188! Szechuen, Ky-min-se near Tchan-Keou, Farges 1075! M. Farges gives the Chinese name of this as Kang-kin-ten. It is very nearly related to both D. Milletti and D. mimosoides but has narrower leaflets and much narrower pods than either. 52. DarserciA Mincertit Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 34 (1860) ; Flor. Hongkong 92 (1861). DV. polyphylla Benth., Pl. Jungh. i. 256 in part (1854); Seem. Bot. Her. 375 (1855). Derris pinnata Lowr. _ Flor. Cochin-Chin. 432 (1793) possibly. Cuina: Hongkong, Hance 1809! Wilford! Ford! Chamyrion ! Hupeh, Henry 3095! 6286! Yunnan, at Mengtze, 5000 feet, Henry 9975 ! 53. DanBercia Hance Benth. in Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 54 (1860); Flor. Hongkong 93 (1861). Cuina: Hongkong, Hance 1810! Ford! Wilford! Weiss! Macao; Calléry in Herb. Gaudichaud, voy. Bonité! Near Canton, Park 35! 54. Dansercta THomsont Benth. in Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 33 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook f. Flor. Brit. Ind. 11, 236 (1876). Assam: Patkoye Mts., Griffith 1799/1 K.D.! Khasia, Hooker & Thomson ! Clarke ! This species is not a Dalbergaria, but a Triptolemea. 55. Dapereia ScorrecHintt Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 444 (1897), A shrubby climber 15-30 feet long with twining glabrous brauches here and there twisted and thickened into spiral hooks. Leaves 15-20 cm. long, leaflets 11-15, elliptic, closely puberulous beneath, glabrous except midrib above, 15-4 cm. (rarely in young shoots 6 cm.) long, 1-2 (rarely 2°5) cm. wide, rachis 8-10 cm. long and petiolules 4mm. long densely puberulous. Flowers minute, secund, in an ample terminal and in smaller axillary paniculate cymes 5 cm. wide and as long as the leaves ; peduncles, branches and pedicels pubescent; bracts eaducous ; bracteoles persistent oné at base of short pedicels lanceolate acuminate and two at base of calyx ovate obtuse embracing lower third of calyx-tube, Calyx 2'5 mm. long, campanulate, teeth short, obtuse, one-third as long as tube, except the acute lowest half as long as tube, J.u.8 | 58 1D). Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, Jorolla white, 4 mm. long, claws of petals short. Stamens 9, sub- 3-adelphous, the central obvexillary stamen being separated almost or quite to the base from the lateral groups of 4 each. Ovary pubescent, shortly stipitate ; style short; ovules usually 3-4, sometimes only 2, rarely more than 4. Pod coriaceous, narrowed at both ends, 4-5 cm. long, 1:25 cm. wide, 1-3-seeded. D. Junghuhnii var. Scortechinii Prazn, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 115 (1897). Mataya: Penang; Ayer Htam, Curtis 1437! Malacca; Bijong, Scortechini 1830! Maingay 549 (Herb. Propr. 1554)! Singapore; Bukit Timah, Ridley 6406! Bangka; Teysmann ! Java; Djampong, Teysmann 1418! Borneo ; Sarawak, Beccari 2887 ! Haviland 2893 ! 56. Darperara Curtisi Prain. A scandent shrub with puberulous branches. Leaves 15-18 cm. long; leaflets usually 7-9, oblong or elliptic, rounded obtuse and faintly emarginate at apex, cuneate rarely rounded at base, glabrous above, rather closely puberulous except on the midrib beneath, 3-5 cm. long, 2°5 cm. wide; rachis 11-12 cm. loug and petiolules 4 mm. long puberulous. Flowers minute, secund, in large axillary panicles exceeding the leaves, peduncles branches and pedicels pubescent; bracteoles persistent, one at base of pedicel lanceo- late, 2 at base of calyx ovate obtuse embracing the lower third of calyx-tube. Calyx 2'5 mm. long, campanulate, teeth short obtuse one- third as long as tube. Corolla white, 4mm. long, claws of petals short. Stamens 9, monadelphous. Ovary pubescent; ovules 2-3. Pod thin, membranous, not seen ripe. D. discolor Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. Suppl. 296 (1860) nec Bl. D. Junghuhnii Bak. in Flor. Brit. Ind. 11, 233 (1876) partly; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 115 (1897) partly, not of Benth. ) Mataya: Penang, 500 ft., Curtis! Malacca, Maingay! Sumatra ; Lampongs, Teysmann ! This species is nearest to D. stercoracea Maingay, but in a note by Maingay himself it is remarked that, while this is the case, the two are very distinct. This has no trace of the foetid odour characteristic of D. stercoracea. The two species have been confused by Mr. Baker and myself with each other and also with : D. Junghuhnii. Miquel, whose specimens:I have seen, has named this D. discolo# ; it is, however, very unlike the Bornean species sonamed by Blume, and previously described by Miquel himself under Blume’s name. 57. Dapureia stercoraceaA Maing. Mss. in Herb. Kew. D. Jung- huhnii Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 233 in part (1876) ; Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. lxvi. 2. 115 var. typica tn part (1897), not of Benth. D. frondosa Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 183 (var. typica only and exclud. all synonyms), (1855), not of Roxb. Mataya: Malacca, Maingay! Mueller! Derry! Singapore, Hullett ! Ridley ! Sumatra, Korthals ! 1901.) . ' -D, Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 59 This has been confounded with D. Junghuhnii Benth. by Mr. Baker and the writer. The fewer differently-shaped leaflets and the stercoraceons odour of the flowers amply distinguish it. Miquel, whose Sumatra specimens of “ D. frondosa”’ have been seen by the writer, has named it as above. Both D. sennoides BI. and D. phyllanthoides Bi, have been included here by Miquel but authentic examples of these, named by Blume, have been seen by the writer and their trug place is indicated under the latter species. - 58. DALBEeRGIA MELANOXYLON Guill. & Perr. Flor. Seneg. Tent. 227, t. 33 (1834) ; Benth., Journ. Linn, Soc. iv. Suppl. 47 (1860). D. Stocksii Benth,, Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 42 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook, f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 234 (1876). Western Inpra: Concan, Stocks! Canara, Talbot ! also at Poona, cult. Woodrow! Madras, cult. Wight’s Collector! Calcutta, cult. Thomson ! Anderson! King! etc. Disrris.—Africa, from Senegal to Abyssinia and Mozambique. | The examination of Stocks’ specimens, and of some exactly like them from Canara in Mr. Talbot’s herbarium, makes it certain that the plant termed D. Stocksii _ by Bentham is the African D. melanoxylon, as represented by many specimens in the Herbaria of Kew, the British Museum, Mr. de Candolle and Calcutta. The same species has been in cultivation at Calcutta at least since 1858, that being the earliest date on our herbarium specimens collected in the Gardens. At Madras it appears to have been in cultivation about as long. There is nothing about Stocks’ specimens to indicate whether that botanist considered the tree indigenous or introduced, but the note by Mr. Talbot that the plant is known in Western India as ‘“ Chinese Blackwood,” as opposed to D. latifolia or ‘“* Bombay Blackwood,” points to a foreign origin. 59. DatBeRGiA MULTIFLORA Heyne ex Wall. in Cat. sub. n. 5848 (1832). Dalbergia sympathetica Nimmo in Grah. Gat. Bomb. Pl. 55 (1839) ; Voigt, Hort. Suburb, Calcutt. 241 (1845); Benth., Pl. Jungh. 255 (1854) ; Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 42 (1860); Dalz. & Gibs., Bomb. Flor. 78 (1861) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. 11. 234 (1876) ; Talbot, Bomb. List 75 (1894). VD. frondosa Wall. Cat. 5855 partly (1832) ; W. § A. Prodr. 266 partly (1534), not of Roxb. D. paniculata Wall. Cat. 5848 partly (1832), not of Rowb.—Anamullu Rheede, Hort. Malabar. ‘vill. 40, ~Wesrern Inpia: Conean, Stocks ! Kuntze ! Canara, Talbot ! Mysore, Heyne! Wight ! Travancore, Lawson 205 ! vaR. glabrescens Pruin; leaflets glabrous above, glabrescent or sparingly pubescent beneath. SOUTHERN InpIA: Carnatic, Wight 819 K.D.! G. Thomson / Courtal- lam, Wight 267! Travancore, Lawson 218! In 1897 the writer pointed out in this Jowrnal (vol. Ixvi. pt. 2, p. 446) that Wallich’s n. 5848 B (from Herb. Heyne) is this species and not, as Wallich erroneously supposed, D. paniculata. Working subsequently through the British Musenm 60 D, Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. .[No. 1, collection the writer discovered a note on a sheet of D. sympathetica Nimmo, from Herb. Wight in Herb. Shuttleworth, in Mr. Bentham's handwriting, which shows that that learned botanist had already made this discovery. The note is as follows :— “This is a distinct species for which Heyne’s name D. multiflora may be retained “unless it turns out be one of Roxburgh’s. I have it in flower from Arnott who, in “his Prodromus, appears to have confounded it with D. frondosa. He had it not then in flower.” This being the Amerimnum horridum of Dennstedt [Schliis. Hort. Malabar. 34 (1818) ] it ought perhaps to receive the name Dalbergia horrida; the objection to using this name is the existence of a synonym D. horrida Grah. which is the equi- valent of D. spinosa Roxb. 60. DALBERGIA PHYLLANTHOIDES Blume ea Mig. in Flor. Ind. Bat. 1. 1, 134 (1855). vAR. typica; leaflets membranous. D. frondosa Mzq. var. B. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 1. 184 (1855). D. polyphylla Benth. Mss. in Herb. Kew (Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 34 partly) not of Pl. Junghuhn. Mataya: Java, Blume ! Nagel 387! Borneo, Barber! Motley 32! VAR. sennoides Prawn; leaflets firmer, larger. D. sennoides Bl. ex Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 1. 134 (1855). D. Junghuhnii Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 33 in part (Malacca plant only) (1860) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 2383 partly (1876), not of Benth. in Pl. Junghuhn. D. subsympathetica Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. Ixvi. 2. 116 (1897). D. littoralis Hassk. Mss. in Herb. Hort. Bog. Mataya: Perak, Scortechini 201! 1071! Wray 2086! 3205! Kunstler 2354! 3562! 4978! 5182! Penang, Curtis 1492! Malacca, Griffith ! Goodenough ! Jagor! Maingay ! Java, cult. in Hort. Bogor. The opportunity of examining authentic examples of Blume’s and Miquel’s specimens in the Leiden Herbarium, kindly afforded by the late Prof. Suringar, has permitted a settlement of the confusion in synonymy connected with this species, the validity of which the writer had already established in 1897. 6]. Datsercia Jonauuana Benth., Pl. Jungh. i. 254 (1854) ; Mig. Ilor. Ind. Bat. 1. 1. 129 (1855); Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 33, in part and as regards the Sumatra locality only (1860). Mataya : Sumatra, at 3000 ft. elev., Junghuhn. 233! Java, de Vriese ! 62. DALBERGIA COROMANDELIANA Prain. An erect glabrous shrub, the ultimate branches distichous, horizontal, rigid, spinous. Leaves fasciculate, 3-4 cm. long, leaflets 7-9, elliptic or cuneate-oblong, retuse, 6-9 mm. long, 3-5 mm. wide, glabrous even when young on both surfaces, rachis 2°5-3'5 em. long, puberulous when young, soon glabrous; petiolules 1 mm. long, glabrous. Flowers minute, secund, in small recurved fascicled cymes, rachis puberulous, 1-1'5 cm, long, pedicels 3 mm. long, glabrous ; bracteoles caducous, one at base of pedicel lanceolate, 2 at base of calyx ovate, subacute, embracing lower third of calyx-tube. Calyx 2°65 mm, a 1901.] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 61 long, campanulate, teeth short, obtuse, one-third as long as tube. Corolla white, 4 mm. long, claws of petals short. Stamens 9—10, monadelphous, diadelphous, or 3-adelplous the obvexillary stamen being free. Ovary glabrescent ; ovules 3-4. Pod thinly coriaceous, distinctly wide-reticulate throughout, quite glabrous, narrow-ovate, 3°5 cm. long, 1'5 cm. wide, distinctly stipitate and cuneate at base, subacute at apex, 1-seeded. D. spinosa W. & A. Prodr. 1. 266 (1884), not of Roxb. SournerNn Inpria: exact locality not stated, Wight 798 (821 K.D.) flower! Shevaghiri Hills, Wight 822 K.D. fruit ! Though much like D. spinosa in general appearance this is very distinct even as regards leaves and flowers, and is wholly distinct as regards fruit. Its nearest ally is in reality D. multiflora, but the much smaller cymes with much longer pedicels, and the much smaller quite glabrous pod amply distinguish it. The leaflets too are much smaller and fewer than in D. sympathetica so that it is easily distinguished, even by its foliage, from D. sympathetica VaR. glabrescens where, as in this, the leaflets may be glabrous. The spines of this plant are straight as in D. spinosa, The stamens, as in the case of D. melanoxylon, may be variously monadelphous, diadel- phous or 3-adelphons. 63. Datseraia piscotor Bl, Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 1. 1380 (1855); Renth. in Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 41 (1860). Mataya: Borneo, southern coasts, Korthals! Celebes, Teysmann 12539 ! 7 This species has been tentatively placed by Bentham near D. foliacea; it is most nearly related to D. rimosa. 64. Danpereaia rimosa Itoxb. Hort. Beng. 53 (1814) ; DC. Prodr. ii, 417 (1825); Roxb. Flor. Ind. 11. 233 (1832); Wall. Cat. 5853 (1832) ; Wight Ic. t. 262 (1840); Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845) ; Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 32 (1860) ; Brandis, For. Flor. 148 (1874) ; Bak, in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. 11. 232 (1876). D. foliacea Wall. (pro parte) Cat. 5856 B; Gamble, Darjeeling List, 29 (1896), nec Wall. Dalbergia sp. Drake del Castillo, Jowrn. de Bot. v. 215 (1891). Sikkim: Lower Hills, Terai and Duars; Hooker ! King! Gamble! Gammie! Haines! Assam: Brahmaputra Valley; Jenkins! Simons! Mann! King’s Collectors! . Masters! Peal! Silhet; Wallich! Ciarke! Cachar; Prazer! Khasia; Griffith 1801! Hooker § Thomson! Clarke ! Mann! Gallatly! Naga Hills; Clarke! Watt! Burma: Kachin Hills, Prain’s Collectors! Tonkin: Black river, Balansa 2293! The Tonkin specimens have the leaflets glabrous beneath and the venation slightly different from that in the leaves of typical D. rimosa. 65. Darpercia Forsesit Prain. A moderately large climbing shrubs with glabrous branches. Leaves 13-18 cm. long, leaflets usually 5, ovate-acuminate, base rounded, thinly coriaceous, closely finely reticu- 62 D, Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, late, glabrous on both surfaces the terminal exceeding the others, 4-9 em; long, 2-4 cm. wide, rachis 6°5-9 em. long and petiolules 5 mm. long glabrous. Flowers uumerous small, secund, in dichotomous cymes disposed in terminal corymbose wide panicles extending into the axils of the upper leaves, 12-15 cm. long, 8-10 cm, wide, shortly pedicelled, 2-bracteolate below the calyx, bracteoles persistent. Calyx campanulate, 9-toothed, teeth all obtuse, subequal, rather shorter than the tube. Corolla white, the petals rather distinctly clawed; standard orbicular, subauriculate, slightly emarginate. Stamens 9, in a sheath slit along the back; sometimes a free vexillary stamen present. Ovary glabrous, shortly stipitate, style short; ovule solitary. Pod distinctly stipitate, coriaceous, oblong, glabrous, veined opposite the seed, 4-6 cm. long, 2 cm. wide, l-seeded. Seed reniform, much compressed. D. parviflora Prain, Journ. As. Soc, Beng. Ixvi. 2.121 (1897) in part, not of Roxb. Mataya: Lingga, Teysmann! Bigni Telok, 3500 feet, Forbes 3216 ! Warburg n. 20310, in Herb. Berol., leaf-specimens from the Aru Islands, appears the same. This the writer in 1897 supposed to be a form of D. parviflora, but the oppor- tunity of examining its fruits, afforded by the kindness of Dr. Treub, who lent the Herbarium material of Dalbergia from Buitenzorg, shows that this is a very distinct species. 66. Datpercta AxLBeRTIsii Prain. A climbing shrub; young branches terete. Leaves 18-20 cm. long; leaflets 8-9, lateral distinctly alternate, very dark-green and quite glabrous on both surfaces, firmly coriaceous, midrib impressed above, prominent beneath, secondary nerves faint especially above, rather numerous, ovate-acute with rounded base, terminal rather the largest, 7 cm, long, 3:25 cm. wide; rachis 14-16 cm. long, and petiolules 3 mm. long glabrous. Flowers minute, secund, in ample terminal thyrsoid panicles, with sparsely puberulous, zigzag rachis 12 cm. long, giving off at each angle stoutish, horizontal branches 2°5 cm, long, breaking at their tips into 2 or more reflexed cyme-branches; bracts and bracteoles minute, deciduous. Calyx 1:5 mm., teeth short obtuse. Corolla and stumens not seen. Pod thin, membranous, green, suborbicular apiculate and 1l-seeded, rarely oblong and 2-seeded, slightly cuneate at the base, 2°5-4 cm. long, 2 cm. wide, 2 mm. thick, finely puberulous, rather distinctly wide-reticulate throughout, with a short but distinct stipe 4 mm. long. New Guinea: Fly River, D’Albertis ! A very distinct species with the inflorescence of the group to which D. multi- flora and D, Junghuhnit belong, but differing in the bracteoles not being persistent and still more in foliage. Its nearest ally is D, Forbesii from Sumatra, a species with much thinner leaves, 1901. ] D. Prain—The Astatic species of Dalbergia. 63 6. Triptolemesx Pseudoselenolobiex. 67. Da.BeRGIA PARVIFLORA Roxb. Hort. Beng. 98 (1814); Flor. Ind. iii. 225 (1832); Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. 1.1. 132 (1855); Benth., Journ. ‘Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 33 (1860); Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. |xvi 2. 121, eacl. syn. D. Cumingiana Benth. (1897). D. Zollingeriana Mig. Flor. Ind. Bat. i. 1. 130 (1855). D. Cumingii var. Zollingeriana Beuth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 32 (1860). D. corymbifera Bl. ex. Migq. lc. (1855). Drepanocarpus Cumingii Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 336 (1877). Burma: Tenasserim, Helfer 1808! Matava: Dindings, Curtis ! Pahang, Ridley! Perak, Wray 2525! Kunstler 1423! 5937! 6151! Sumatra, Zollinger 3041! Teysmann 4440! Java, Blume (type of D. corymbifera) ! Teysmann! Borneo; Sarawak, at Bintulu, Beccari 3601! at Sungei Mahan, Beccari 3585! at Santubong, Beccari 2149! Celebes, Zollinger (type of D. Zollingeriana Miq.)! Halmaheira, Teysmann 5668 ! Moluccas; Amboina, 0. Smith! _ Possibly this is cultivated in Tenasserim. The original; ticket of 2 Helfer’s n. 1808 shows that it came from Tenasserim not the Andamans; it was found at the 3rd Camp from Tenasserim in clearings in a native garden, This yields the Kayoe Lakka of commerce. Beccari describes it as a spiny climbing shrub, the spines woody and branched. Its Malay name is Acor Berangan, Old stems stripped of alburnum and dead are reddish (rosso-ciliegio) and are termed Caju Lacca—used by the Chinese in their ceremonies with other odoriferous woods. The opportunity of examining good specimens of Cuming’s n 1244in Herb. De Candolle and of studying the fine suite of specimens of D. Cumingiana in Herb. Kew has enabled the writer to see that the two species, though united by Mr. Bentham, are very distinct. 68. Datpereia Cuminerana Benth., Pl. Junghuhn. 255 (1854) ; Mig. Flor. Ind, Bat. i. 1. 129 (1855). D. Cumingii Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 32, excl. var. Zollingeriana (1860). Puiippines: Luzon, Cuming 1244! Vidal 735! Pili, Vidal 1255! Catarman, Isd. of Samar, Vidal 255! 69. DatperctA Goperroyt Prain. A woody climber, branchlets subdistichous, recurved, puberulous. Leaves 7-8 em. long, leaflets 6-9, wide ovate, firmly papery, finely puberulous on both surfaces, base rounded, apex rounded or slightly emarginate, 15-3 cm. long, 1-1:75 em. wide, rachis 4-5 cm. long and petiolules 2°5 mm. long puberulous. Flowers in axillary, subsimple racemes forming terminal, leafy panicles, rachis puberulous. Calyx campanulate, in fruit glabrescent or puberu- lous, pedicels 25 mm. long, teeth subequal, obtuse, shorter than tube except the lowest lanceolate about as long as tube. Petals and stamens not seen. Pod obliquely subreniform, thinly woody, 2 cm. long, 1:25 cm. wide, 4mm, thick, finely closely velvety externally, with a flattened 64. D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. [No. 1, stipe ‘O-1°25 cm. long, also velvety, and ovuligerous in its upper part. Seed compressed, reniform, 8 mm. long, 4 mm. wide. Sram: South-west of the Great Lake, Godefroy 288 ! A very distinct species, evidently belonging to the same group as D. Cumingiana- and D. parviflora, but well-marked by its closely finely velvety pods. 70. Datpereta Beccaru Prain. A climbing shrub with slender, terete, densely finely pubescent branches. Leaves sub-2-farious, 3-4 em. long, leaflets 11-19, oblong, slightly emarginate at the apex, dark-green above rather paler beneath, finely pubescent on both surfaces, 8 mm. long, 4 mm. wide; rachis 3.5 cm. long and very short petiolules pubescent; stipules lanceolate, 2 mm. long. Jlowers very minute, secund, in small cymes in the lower leaf-axils, under 1 cm. wide; rachis and pedicels puberulous ; bracts and bracteoles deciduous, very minute. Calyx 1:5 mm. long, campanulate, teeth short, obtuse, one-third as long as tube except the lower acute three-fourths the length of the tube. Corolla not seen. Stamens monadelphous. Ovary glabrous. Pod firm, thickish, pale-brown, coriaceous, glabrous, 1-seeded, irregularly ovate, apiculate, 1:25 cm. long, 8 mm. wide, 2°5 mm. thick, with a short but distinct stipe 2°55 mm. long. Ormocarpum scandens Teysm. Mss. in Herb. Beccari. | Borneo: Sarawak, Kuching, Beccari 066! 1105! Kapuas, Teysmann 8254 ! 71. Datpereta spinosa foxb. Hort. Beng. 98 (1814); Flor. Ind. iii. 226 (1832); Voigt, Hort. Suburb. Calcutt. 241 (1845) ; Benth., Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl. 49 eacluding citation Wight 798 (1860) ; Bak. in Hook f, Flor. Brit. Ind. ii. 238 eacl. ref. W. §& A. Prodr. (1876); Talbot, Bombay List 75 (1894). D. horrida Grah. in Wall. Cat. 5877 (1832) ; Drepanocarpus spinosus Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma i. 337 (1877). S. Inpia: Arcot, Gamble 18212! Madras, Heyne (Wallich, Cat. 5877 B)! W.Inp1a: Concan, coast, fide V'albof. BencaL: Sundribuns, Kurz! Olarke! Ball! Heinig! Grifith 1811! Cuirracone: coast, Roaburgh. Burma: Rangoon, Kurz 1762! Moulmein, Wallich ! III. Senenotosiom Benth. 7. Selenolobiexe Pseudodalbergariex. 72. DALBERGIA RENIFORMIS Rowb. Hort. Beng. 53 (1814); Flor. Ind. ili. 226 (1832) ; Wight, Icones i. 261 (1840) ; Bak. in Hook. f. Flor. Brit. Ind. 11. 238 (1876). D. flexuosa Girah. in Wall. Cat. 5875 (1882) ; Benth , Journ. Linn. Soc. iv. Suppl, 48 (1860). D. stipulata Wall. Cat. 5868 partly (1832). Drepanocarpus reniformis Kurz, For. Flor. Brit. Burma 1. 336 (1877). , | Assam: Smith (Herb. Rozxb.)! Silhet, deSilva! Clarke 42711! 1901.] D. Prain—The Asiatic species of Dalbergia. 65 Cachar, Prazer 149! Burma: Pegu, Kurz 1785! 2608! Brandis! Tenas- serim, Oleghorn ! Falconer! Gallatly ! Beddome! An original example of D. reniformis, so named by Roxburgh himself, is preserved inthe Brit. Mus. collection. The stamens in this species are iso- diadelphous. 8. Selenolobiexe Pseudosissox. 73. DALBERGIA FALCATA Prain, A climbing shrub; young branches angular, rusty-puberulous, their bases beset with ovate-acute, sub- coriaceous bracts 2°5 mm. long. Leaves 10-16 cm. long, leaflets 5-9, _ the lateral ones approximate but hardly ever opposite, dark-green above, pale beneath, glabrous above, finely sparsely adpressed-pubescent beneath, chartaceous, ovate shortly abruptly acuminate, the terminal 7-8 cm. long, 83cm. wide, progressively smaller downwards, midrib rather prominent beneath, secondary veins 6-8 pairs fine but distinct beneath, as are the reticulations ; rachis 4'5-10 cm. long, and petiolules 3-4 mm. long glabrous; stipules lanceolate, slightly striate within, pubescent externally, 8 mm. long. Flowers in axillary panicles 6-8 cm, long, with spreading rusty-puberulous branches, bracts and bracteoles deciduous, pedicels 2°5 mm. long. Calyx 3 mm. long, teeth lanceolate except the upper, the lowermost as long as the tube. Corolla not seen, Stamens monadelphous. Ovary rusty-pubescent. Pod finely puberulous, at length glabrescent, rigid, falcate, not very greatly thickened, 1-2- seeded, 3 cm. (when 2-seeded 5°5 cm.) long, 1:75 cm. wide, 6 mm. thick, with a distinct, slender, puberulous stipe 8 mm. long, dark-brown when ripe, with narrow grey lines alongside the ventral suture. Borneo: Bintulu, Beccari 4027! Sarawak, Beccari 67 ! A very distinct member of the group to which D, reniformis and D. Kunstleri belong. 74, Da.percia Konstiert Prain, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xvi. 2. 121 (1897) and 453 (1897). Mataya: Perak, Kunstler 4736 ! 7067 ! This is obviously very closely related to D. reniformis but it has, if not always, at least usually monadelphous stamens. Oe ee nr’ aan Jott 9 66 G. King—Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula. ([No. 1, V.—Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula.—By Sir Grorar Kine, K.C.1.E., LL.D., F.R.S., &e., late Superintendent of the Royal Botanic Garden, Calcutta, [Received April 2nd; Read June 5th, 1901. ] No. 12. The present contribution to these Materials is occupied exclusively by an account of the Natural Order Myrtacez. In the sequence followed in Hooker’s Flora of British India, which has been adopted in these papers, this family ought to have immediately preceded Melastomaceex. But, for reasons which are of no importance to any one besides the author, the account of the latter order was prepared first and was pub- lished in the eleventh of these papers. In the present paper 122 species, belonging to 11 genera, are described. Six of these genera are re- presented by only a single species; two of them by 2 species; one by 5, one by 11, and the remaining one (Hugenia) by no fewer than 96 species. The latter genus is a very perplexing one, from the fact that the species resemble each other so closely. It is impossible to limit the genus by really good well-marked characters, and it is equally impossible to divide it into sub-genera by characters which do not break down. Eugenia seems to be essentially a genus in the evolution of which an extraordinary number of the successive forms have been preserved. I have adhered to the arrangement of the species into the groups Jambosa © and Syzygium, although there are many species which might be referred to either. Nobody can be more dissatisfied than I myself am with the clavis of the species which I have prepared. In fact, while dealing with this genus and with its literature, the belief has been forced upon me that verbal descriptions are of very little use in identifying the species, and that the only safe way of doing so is by comparison with authen- tically named Herbarium specimens. Order XLVI. MYRTACEA. Trees or shrubs, rarely herbs. Leaves opposite, seldom alternate or whorled, petioled, simple, entire, rarely denticulate or crenate, 3-nerved or pinnately-nerved and usually with an intramarginal nerve, generally coriaceous, and dotted with pellucid glands. Stcpules if present small and deciduous. Flowers regular, very rarely irregular, hermaphrodite, or polygamous by abortion, axillary, solitary or in spikes cymes corymbs or heads, naked or with an involucre, often with 2 bracts at the base, white, pink, purple, or yellow, never blue. Calyx superior or }-superior, limb 4-5-many-fid or -partite, persistent or deciduous, 1901.) G. King—Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula. 67 valvate or imbricate, sometimes entire or closed in bud. Petals inserted on a disk surrounding the cavity of the calyx, equal in number to the calyx-lobes and alternate with them, rarely 0. Disc lining the calyx- tube, staminiferous at the margin. Stamens usually numerous, inserted with the petals in several rows, rarely definite and alternate with the petals; filaments free or more or less coherent at the base or in bundles opposite the petals ; anthers small roundish, with parallel cells bursting longitudinally. Ovary inferior or 3-inferior, crowned by a fleshy disk, 1- celled with 1 or more ovules, or more usually 2-many-celled with many ovules; placentation axile (parietal in Rhodamnia) ; style terminal rarely lateral, smooth or bearded at the summit; stigma undivided. Fruit usually crowned by the calyx-limb, either 1l-celled and 1-seeded by abortion, or 2—many-celled with loculicidal dehiscence; or baccate and indehiscent with the cells many-seeded or l-seeded by arrest. Seeds angular cylindric or compressed ; testa hard or membranous, sometimes winged ; albumen 0; embryo straight curved or spirally twisted, cotyle- dons usually short and obtuse sometimes combined into a mass with the radicle, very rarely leafy, radicle often thick. Distr1s.—Tropical and sub-tropical regions of both hemispheres ; species upwards of 2800, Tripe I. Leptospermex. Fruit capsular; leaves opposite or alternate. Leaves narrow. Flowers few or solitary in the leaf-axils. Stamens 10 or fewer, free, in a single series ; leaves opposite aa ric cee 1. B#cCKEA, Stamens numerous, free, in a single series; leaves yee | nate ..:. vss .. 2, LEPTOSPERMUM. Flowers in heads or spikes; ee Tae alternate ; stamens numerous, slightly combined into bundles ‘ opposite to and longer than the petals oe «. oO MELALEUCA, Leaves broad. Flowers in axillary cymes; leaves alternate; stamens indefinite, united into 5 bundles opposite to and shorter than the petals aoe SS a «. 4,. TRISTANIA, Tribe IJ, Myrtex. Fruit a berry; leaves opposite, often gland-dotted. Ovary I1-celled with 2 parietal multi-ovulate RIRC=nGaet: flowers small; leaves 3-nerved from the base 5. RHODAMNIA. Ovary 1-3-celled with 2 rows of ovules in each cell sepa- rated by spurious partitions; flowers rather large; leaves 3- to 5-nerved at the base, seeds numerous ... ... 6, RHODOMYRTUS. Ovary 5- (sometimes 4-) celled, with several ovules in dgak ce]l, often with spurious partitions; seeds few; embryo long and narrow with small cotyledons: flowers small and numerous; leaves not 3-neryed _se.. ae ... % DECASPERMUM, 68 G. King—Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula. [No. 1, Ovary 2-3-celled with several ovules in each cell, without spurious partitions; embryo thick, fleshy; cotyledons large radicle short; seeds few; stamens numerous .,. 8. HUGENIA, Ovary 2-celled with numerous ovules in each cell; flowers small, few, in small axillary inflorescences. Stamens 8: otherwise as in Eugenia 7” va ... 9. PSEUDO-EUGENIA. TRIRE JII, Lecythidex. Fruit hard and fibrous or fleshy, : indehiscent ; leaves alternate, not gland-dotted. Stamens all antheriferous, staminodes none; embryo un- divided ; fruit angular, one-seeded = ... LO. BARRINGTONIA. Inner stamens shorter and without anthers; embryo in- volute ; the cotyledons leafy, plicate: fruit ovoid, several- seeded vee se eee ass .» Ll. PLANCHONIA. 1. Backea, Linn. Glabrous heath-like shrubs. Leaves opposite, narrow, pointed, entire, with many pellucid glands. lowers 5-merous, rarely 4-merous, axillary, peduncled, with 2 minutely bracteolate. Calya-tube widely campanulate ; lobes 5, membranous, persistent. Petals 5, suborbicular. Stamens 10 or fewer, shorter than the petals. Ovary in the single Malay species 3-inferior, 2-3-celled, with several ovules in each cell. Capsule bursting from above loculicidally. Seeds angular; embryo straight with short cotyledons.—Distris. Species about 50, the greater number Australian, a few in New Caledonia, one only extending into India. There are considerable differences in the stamens amongst the species referred by Messrs. Bentham and Hooker to this Linnzan genus. Some of the species have only 5 stamens, while others (like the solitary Indo-Malayan one) have 10 which however are not unfrequently reduced to 8. There are moreover differences in the shape of the anthers and filaments. The ovaries also in some have two and in others three cells. On these and other characters more than a dozen genera were founded by Schauer and others, but these have been advantageously reduced to Beckea. B&CKEA FRUTESCENS, Linn, Sp. Pl. 358.