Bibliotheque botanique EMILE BURNAT <^'aiul<>jiue .\' VI LiMv> provrnaiil .1." la hibli()lli«'M"<' l><»l:mi(|ne crEmile BurnaK 18-2S-IU-20), iiisrivs cii ocIoImt I«)-20 (bus la bil.liollHMjii.'dii Coiiscnaloirc botanique de ,.,>..(•-..■. ...'.I. ...1.1 M TAi-l^' i\i> /Innatian rrFinili' Ill ©XT r/^ THE JOURNAL OF BOTANY BRITISH AND FOEEISN. HENRY TRIMEN, M.B., F.L. S. BRITISH MUSEUM. ASSISTED BY S. LE M. MOORE, F.L.S. ROYAL HERBARIUM, KKW. NEW SERIES, VOL VII. (vol. XVI. OF THE ENTIRE WORK.) ILLUSTRATED WITH PLATES. LONDON: WEST, NEWMAN & CO., 54, HATTON GAKDEN. 18 78. LONDON : WKST. NEWMAN AND CO., PKINTKK!- 54. HATTON GARDEN, E.C. OONTEIBUTOES THE 'JOUKNAL OF BOTANY.'— NEW SEEIES. Eev. F. Addison. Eev. T. Allin. W. Archer, F.R.S. Prof. F. W. C. Areschoug. Prof. P. Ascherson. Prof. C. C. Babington, F.R.S., F.L.S. J. Bagnall. C. Bailey. J. G. Baker, F.E.S., F.L.S. Mrs. Baker. J.Ball,F.R.S., F.L.S. L B. Balfour, So. D., F.L.S. Prof. J. H. Balfour, M.D., F.R.S. R. M. Barrington. M. J. Barrington -Ward, M.A., F.L.S. W. H. Beeby. A. Bennett. A. W. Bennett, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. G. Bennett, M.D., F.R.S. G. Bentham, F.R.S., F.L.S. Rev. M. J. Berkeley, F.L.S. T. B. Blow. H. Boswell. J. T. I. Boswell (formerly Syme), F.L.S. R. Braithwaite, M.D., F.L.S. G. S. Boulger, F.L.S. Mrs. Brajmwell. D. Brandis, M.D., F.L.S. T. R. Archer Briggs, F.L.S. J. Britten, F.L.S. H. Bromwich. R. Brown (Liverpool). H. G. Bull, M.D. M. M. Bull, M.D. W. Carruthers, F.R.S., F.L.S. Prof. T. Caruel. Prof. R. Caspary. Prof. A. H. Church. A. Christ, Ph.D. A. Craig- Christie, F.L.S. J. W. Clark. H. Cleghorn, M.D., F.L.S. J. Collins. T. Comber. M. C. Cooke, A.L.S. Prof. F. Crepin. Rev. J. M. Crombie, M.A., F.L.S. J. Cunnack. F. CuRREY, F.R.S., F.L.S. N. A. Dalzell. Alph. DeCandolle. A. Deseglise. Prof. G. Dickle, M.D., F.L.S. G. C. Druce. J. F. Duthie, B.A., F.L.S. W. T. Thiselton Dyer, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. Rev. a. E. Eaton, M.A. Mrs. Edwards. Prof. A. W. Eichler. A. Ernst, Ph.D. Prof. W. G. Farlow, M.D. W. Fawcett. H. C. Field. T. B. Flower, F.L.S. W. 0. Focke. E. FOURNIER. A. Franchet. Rev. J. Eraser. A. French. IProf. E. Fries. H. G. Glasspoole. Prof. A. Gray, M.D. f J. E. Gray, Ph.D., F.L.S. L. H. Grindon. H. Groves. J. Groves. tD. Hanbury, F.R.S., F.L.S. F. J. Hanbury, F.L.S. H. F. Hance, Ph.D., F.L.S. H. C. Hart, F.L.S. W. E. Hart. IV CONTBIBUTOES. M. M. Hartog, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. |W. A. Hayne. W. B. Hemsley, A.L.S. W. P. HiERN, M.A., F.L.S. Bev. W. M. Hind, LL.D. c. p. hobkirk. fMiss E. Hodgson. B. Holland. E. M. Holmes, F.L.S. Sir J. D. Hooker, K.C.S.L, M.D., F.B.S., F.L.S. T. HowsE, F.L.S. Bev. B. Hunter. J. Hussey. I A. Irvine. B. D. Jackson, F.L.S. J. B. Jackson, A.L.S. G. S. Jenman. J. H. A. Jenner. F. E. Kitchener, F.L.S. fS. KuRz. Bev. J. E. Leefe, F.L.S. E. Lees, F.L.S. Bev. ^Y. A. Leighton, B.A., F.L.S. Prof. S. 0. Lindberg, M.D. A. Lister, F.L.S. Mrs. Lomax. C. Longfield. Prof. W. B. McNab, M.D., F.L.S. J. C. Mansel-Pleydell, F.L.S. M. T. Masters, M.D., F.B.S., F.L.S. W. Mathews. J. C. Mklvill, M.A., F.L.S. Mrs. Merrifield. J. MiEKs, F.B.S., F.L.S. W. Mitten, A.L.S. D. Mooke, Pu.D., F.L.S. S. le M. Moore, F.L.S. A. G. More, F.L.S. Prof. J. Morris. Baron F. von Mueller, Ph.D., F.B.S., F.L.S. C. J. MULLER. J. MuLLER (Arg.). General W. Munro, C.B., F.L.S. G. B. M. Murray, F.L.S. A. Nathorst. F. Naylor. I G. Nicholson. I Prof. D. Oliver, F.B.S., F.L.S. Bev. E. O'Meara, M.A. W. H. Pearson. C. H. Peck. W. Phillips, F.L.S. C. B. Plowright. H. Polakowsky. J. Pollard. C. Prentice. H. Prestoe. B. A. Pryor, B.A., F.L.S. Bev. W. H. Purchas. ' W. W. Beeves. H. Beeks, F.L.S. Prof. H. G. Beichenbach, fil. J. Benny, F.L.S. W. Bichardson. J. F. Bobinson. W. D. Boebuck. Bev. W. Moyle Bogers, M.A. F. C. S. BopER, F.L.S. J. Sadler. J. Scott, F.L.S. J. C. Shenstone. W. G. Smith, F.L.S. H. C. Sorby, F.B.S. B. Spruce, Ph.D. F. Stratton, F.L.S. Bev. G. S. Streatfeild, M.A. F. Townsend, M.A., F.L.S. Prof. J. W. H. Trail, M.D., F.L.S. Sir W. C. Trevelyan, Bart. H. Trimen, M.B., F.L.S. B. Trimen, F.L.S. B. Tucker, M.A. S. H. Vines, M.A., F.L.S. F. I. "Warner, F.L.S. Hon. J. L. Warren, M.A. I D. A. Watt. I F. M. Webb. Bev. B. H. Webb, M.A. , IF. Welwitsch, M.D., F.L.S. E. C. White. I F. Buchanan White. M.D., F.L.S. J. Willis, Ph.D. I W. Wise. i Bev. B. Wood, M.A. ©vtgtnal 'Mxtitlt^. ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE PITCHER OF CEPHALOTUS FOLLICULARIS. By Alexander Dickson, M.D., Eegius Professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow. (Tab. 193.) [Abstract of a paper read at the meeting of the British Association at Plymouth, August, 1877.] In Cephalotiis there are two forms of leaf : — 1st. Xon-ascidiform, v/ith petiole and lamina of ordinary description; and 2ncl. Ascidiform, with cylindrical petiole, from extremity of which depends a jpitcher, with a lid attached by a broad base to that part of the orifice next the petiole and the main axis. The pitcher here appears to be a pouching from the under surface of the leaf, in this respect differing remarkably from those of Nepenthes and Sarracenia. It is scarcely safe, in absence of developmental evidence, to dogmatise on the subject ; but, as matter of fact, the pitcher-lid in Nepenthes and Sarracenia springs from that portion of the orifice farthest from the axis ; while in Cephalotus, as above stated, it springs from that portion next the axis. In Nepenthes, Sir J. D. Hooker has shown that the leaf-apex is represented by a bristle-like process at the back of the hinge of the lid (Fig. 2, ap). In Sarracenia the lid itself would appear to be the terminal lobe of the leaf. In Cephalotus, also, it seems sc9.rcely possible to doubt that the lid represents the terminal lobe of the leaf, and, if so, the pouching, as already said, must be from the lower leaf- surface. The Cephalotus pitcher exhibits on its outer surface three w^ll-marked wing-like processes, one median (Fig. 1, mdw) placed dorsally (away from the axis), and two lateral directed obliquely. The lid (Fig. 1, /) of the pitcher is somewhat concave towards its inner surface, and exhibits strongly-marked ribs branching dichotomously, and connected by transverse smaller veins. It is usually more or less streaked with red, and tovrards the margin are to be seen, in the areolae between the veins, translucent spots where the parenchyma is deficient, and which remind one of those on the upper part of the pitcher of Darlingtonia. From the outer surface of the lid, from the wing- like ridges, and also from the margins and petioles of the non- ascidiform leaves, more or less elongated pale brown hairs spring of very remarkable structure. The orifice of the pitcher is furnished with a cartilaginous corrugated rim produced internally into a n. s. vol. 7. [January, 1878.] u 2 PITCHER OF CEPHALOTUS FOLLICULARIS. number of inflexed teeth (Fig. 1, it), almost exactly as is seen in some species of Xepenthes. This corrugated rim is deficient along the line of the base of the lid. Within or below the corru- gated rim is a remarkable ledge or shelf extending all round the inside of the pitcher, its free and rather sharp edge projecting downwards into the cavity, and forming as it were an inner orifice : from its jn-obable function, this may be called the conducting shelf (Fig. 1, c.b). Below this the upper two-thirds or three-fourths of the inner surface (Fig. 1, ngs) is smooth, glassy, and studded over with glands which no doubt secrete a digestive fluid. At the lower limit of this secreting surface on either side of the pitcher is to be noted a very oblique, somewhat curved linear elevation of the surface ; to the naked eye, of a dull reddish brown colour, or almost of a neutral tint (Fig. 1, Ip). These coloured elevations exhibit a very remarkable glandular structure, and may be designated the lateral coloured jmtches. Below these patches the inner surface of the bottom of the pitcher is smooth and eglandular (Fig. 1, ds). As regards structural details, these may be considered under the following heads : — A. Outer Surface of Pitcher and Lid. — Here occur stomata of ordinary type, and peculiar glands, each consisting of a group of small cells. Each group, as viewed from the surface, is of oval form, two cells forming a central oval, with then- line of contact across the short diameter, these two cells being surrounded by four others. Similar six- celled glands are also to be found on the inner surface of the pitcher-lid, on the corrugated rim of the pitcher, and on both surfaces of the non-ascidiform leaves. The most remarkable structures, however, connected with the outside of the pitcher are the pale brown hairs already noted. Each of these is an elongated cell with pointed extremity and a broad truncated base imbedded in a slightly elevated group of epidermis cells. This unicellular lian is solid from the tip to within a half or a third of the distance from the base. The cell cavity thus reduced is bounded by a distinct and highly refractive wall, and the appcara)icc is thus presented of one hair encapsulated within another. According to the modern view of cell-thickening by interstitial intus-susception, this would be a remarkable case of the differentiation of the thickened cell-wall into two layers of difterent character. These hairs are minutely tuberculated on the outer surface. B. Inner Surface of Pitcher-lid. — Here the epidermis-cells are somewhat imbricated from above downwards, and their free walls form slight downward bulgings. The free surfaces of these cells exhibit beautiful ridge-like striae ; and the surface ridging is so arranged as to form little transverse arches between adjacent cells, with concavities directed downwards. These arches, no doubt, constitute obstructive ledges which would oppose the upward passage of an insect. The small glands, already mentioned, which are scattered over this surface might have been supposed to secrete honey for the attraction of insects ; but this may be PITCHER OF CEPHALOTUS FOLLICULARIS. 3 considered doubtful, seeing that similar glands occur on both sur- faces of the non-ascidiform leaves and all over the outside of the pitcher. They are somewhat yellow in colour. C. Cornif/atcd Film of Pitcher. — The structure here is remark- ably like that in Nepenthes, the cells being considerably indurated and somewhat elongated, and the surface x^resenting transverse arch-like ledges extending between adjoining cells. As already mentioned, small six-celled glands occur here. D. Conductimj Shelf. — Here the epidermis-cells are produced on their free surface into downward- directed hairs. On the inner surface of the XDitcher-lid the downward bulging of the cells has been already mentioned. These bulgings become more and more pronounced towards the base of the lid, and a gradual passage is to be noted from the slight bulgings above to the pronounced hair-like projections on the shelf below. The epidermis-cells of the outer or concealed surface of the shelf are likewise produced into downward-directed hairs, except along the line of reflection (Fig. 1, a.-) from this to the glandular surface of the inside of the pitcher where the hairs come to stand at right angles to the surface. Here each epidermis-cell is seen to be produced in its middle into an acuminate conical hair, from the base of which superficial ridges extend, one to each of the adjoining haks. The superficial ridges thus map out the surface into triangular spaces, and a most remarkable and beautiful arachnoid appearance is presented. Similar ridges appear to connect the bases of neighbouring hairs on the other portions of the shelf; but from the appression of these hairs, the ridges are not so apparent : and even in the epidermis-cells of the inner surface of the lid the delicate striae have frequently a tendency to form groups passing from the apex of one cell to those of neighbouring ones. E . UjyjJ^r 'portUm of secretimj Inner Surface of Pitcher (all above the coloured patches). Here the epidermis is covered by a strong glassy cuticula which is apparently elastic, as it is often to be seen rolled back from the subjacent epidermis-cells when it happens to become cracked. The epidermis- cells are moderately thickened with wavy, somewhat indented or crenated, outline. Scattered over this surface are numerous glands of considerable size, each consisting of an ovoid mass of cells (in longitudinal section are seen, say 30 to 40 cells) imbedded in the subepidermal parenchyma, from the cells of which they are to be distinguished by their com- paratively dense proto^^lasm, by the absence of chlorophyll, and often by theii* smaller size. The small ends of these ovoid glands bulge slightly upon the surface where they are not covered with epidermis. These glands do not appear to have any special relation to the vascular bundles, in this respect differing remark- ably from the " j)eptic" glands of Nepenthes. F. Lateral Coloured Patches. — These evidently constitute the most specialised portion of the secreting apparatus . The epidermis - cells here are much smaller than those of the upper secreting surface, and, for the most part,' are angular instead of wavy in out- line. They are filled with deep crimson fiuid. Thickly scattered 4 PITCHER OF CEPHALOTUS FOLLICULARIS. among these pigment-cells are very numerous oval bodies, each consisting apparently of a central somewhat elevated oval cell surrounded by 2 to 4 others. These bodies are colourless or slightly yellowish, with brilliantly refractive cell- walls, and offer a most beautiful contrast with the deep red ground over which they are studded. Besides the structures above described there arc, on the lateral coloured patches, pretty numerous im- bedded glands of the same type as those in the upper secretmg surface ; but, for the most part, of very much larger size, their linear measurement being about double of that of the glands on the upper portion. The small ends of these large glands form bulgings on the surface of the patch, and, as in the glands above, are not covered by epidermis. On surface view the cells at the uncovered apices of the ovoid glands, both on the upper secreting surface and on the lateral patches, present a very remarkable appearance. The cell-walls here are somewhat thickened, and between the adjacent cell-walls are oblong or roundish spaces, filled apparently wdtli oil, which give to the superficial cell net- work a somewhat beaded appearance. On the coloured j)atches the epidermis-cells in the vicinity of the uncovered portions of the imbedded glands are more or less wavy in outline and are unmixed with the small oval bodies just mentioned ; and their contents exhibit a fine gradation of tints from the palest rose- colour immediately around the exposed part of the gland, which is nearly colourless, to the deep crimson of the common ground- work of the patch. A surface view of the coloured patches affords one of the most exquisite microscopic appearances imaginable. The red-coloured cell-contents here, as well as in other parts of the pitcher, very soon after injury of the cells or treatment by reagents, change to a bright blue. G. Surface of the Bottom of the Pitcher — that part where the insect-prey finds its last resting place — is smooth, eglandular, with wavy epidermis-cells. Postscript. — Glast/ow, November, 1877. — On announcement of the foregoing results to the British Association, Dr. Lawson Tait, who was present, stated that he also had studied the anatomy of the CephaJotus pitcher ; and, for the most part, spoke in confirmation of my statements. He further stated the result of experiments performed by him with fluid taken from virgin or unopened pitchers, showing that it exerted a similar digestive action upon animal substances to that exhibited by fluid from Nrpnithes pitcher, &c. He correctly pointed out wdiat I had not then had opportunity of observing, that in young unopened pitchers the lateral patches (called by him the '* omcea (Pharbitisj congesta, E. Br. In msula Prata, maris chinensis, m. April, 1858, leg. C. Wilford. The peduncles are 1 -flowered, and the corolla rather more than three mches in length m my specimens. 43. Pedicidaris longiflora, Eudolphi. In m. Siao-uri-tai-shan, Julio 1876, coll. W. Hancock. This curious and very distmct species had only hitherto been found in Baikal, Siberia. 44. Thimhergia fragram, Eoxb. Serpens inter gramina secus viam a portu Hoihan ad metropolin Kieng-chan-fii ins. Hainan ducentem, d. 18, Novembris, 1866, coll. Sampson et Hance. 45. Dmlalacanthus nercosus, T. And. In umbrosis riparum scopulosarum praecipitum ad fauces Shiuhing, secus fl. West Eiver, Febr. 1857, legit Sampson. Not previously recorded from China. 46. Avicennia officinalis, L. In ins. Kulangsu, Amoy, Julio, 1865, coll. Sampson. 47. Polygonum midtifonim, Thunb. Circa Chinkiang, 1876, coll. Stronach. A rare Chinese plant, as far as I can judge from different envois. 48. WiKSTRCEMiA MoNNULA, sp. uov . Eamis angulatis gla- berrimis atropurpureis, ramulis pubescentibus, foliis oppositis v. alternis herbaceis ellipticis acutis supra glaberrimis opacis subtus pallidis tenuiter venosis sparsim pilosulis 9 lin. longis 4 lin. latis petiolo f Imeali, racemis ramulos terminantibus capituliformibus 14 SPICILEGIA FLOR.E SINENSIS. 8-12-fioris, xDerigoiiio gracili sericeo-pubescente in sicco luteo- purpurasceuti semipollicari lobis brevibus obtusiusculis tubo triplo brevioribus, autheris superioribus subexsertis inferioribus medio tubo sitis, ovario obloiigo apice sericeo-pubesceiite, stylo brevi glaberrimo stigmate magiio capitato, squamulis hypogyiiis binis lineari-oblongis viridibus ovario triplo brevioribus. In prov. Cautouensi, secus fl. North Eivcr, m. Martio, 1877, coll. T. L. Bullock. (Herb, propr. n. 19,989.) A pretty and delicate species, apparently quite distinct from any yet described. 49. Argyrothaimnia (SpercmsJcia) cantonensis, .s^^. nov. Caule tomentoso, foliis alternis flaccidis ovato-oblongis utrinque obtusis grosse et in^equaliter crenato-serratis serraturis sinubusque minute glandulosis supra sparsim pilosis subtus tomentosis penninerviis costa nervisque subtus prominulis copiose et minute pellucido- punctatis 1^-2 poll, longis 7-9 lin. latis petiolo 3-9 lineali, stipulis nuUis, racemis terminalibus hii-sutis, floribus binis v. saepius ternis pedicellatis nunc in ramulos breves dispositis unisexualibus 1^ lin. diametro bracteis parvis lanceolatis fultis, sepalis extus hirsutis lanceolatis, petalis tenerrimis albidis deltoideo-obovatis unguiculo brevi sepalis paulo brevioribus, staminibus 10-15 triverticillatis parum exsertis filamentis glaberrimis, ovario tridymo hirsuto tuberculis grossis oblongis obsito, stylis bii'sutis bifidis stigmatibus laceris. Secus fl. North Kiver, i^rov. Cantonensis, Martio, 1877, coll. T. L. Bullock. (Herb, propr. n. 19,955.) An interesting plant, resembling in general appearance its near relative -i. tuhcrculata, Miill. Arg. ! from North China, but differing by its long-stalked proportionally wider leaves, with crenate teeth, the entke absence of stipules, and the smaller flowers and bracts. 50. Euphorbia Esiila, L. ; E. cyparissiuides, Boiss. Secus fl. North Eiver, Mart. 1877, leg. Bullock. Common apparently in the extreme north of China, but not previously recorded from the south of the Emph-e. 51. ChloranthuH japonicus, Siebold. Secus fl. North Eiver, Martio, 1877, leg. Bullock. A singularly meridianal station for a plant heretofore detected only m Japan, the Korean archipelago and Machuria. 52. Trcivia nudijlora, Willd. Li fruticetis juxta Cantonem, ApriU, 1870, detexit T. Sampson. New to China. 53. Erlucaulon echimdatinn, Mart. In uliginosis extra Can- tonem, secus viam ad montes Pakwan ducentem, d. 16 Octobris, 1866, detexit T. Sampson. This pretty little species had hitherto only been recorded from Burma. 54. Cyperus Wiyhtii, N. ab E. Whampoa, Maio, 1875. The Chinese plant is quite identical with an Assam specimen gathered by Jenkins, for which I am indebted to Dr. George King, who gives C. ZoUinfjeri, Steud. as a synonym. C. cwnpressufi, var. spicidis aiKjustis, Thw. {Q. P. 807) is also undistinguishable, and Dr. Har- land gathered tlie same plant in Singapore. His sj)ecimen in my herbarium was doubtfully identified by Mr. Bentham with 6'. SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. 15 tucidulus, Klein. Although referred to C. comjn-essus by Thwaites, Nees and Steudel both place it in a separate paragraph of the genus. This species is new to the Chinese flora. 55. Polypodiuin hirtellum, BL In summo monte Tai-mo-shan, i.e., * mons ingens molarum ' e regione ins. Hongkong, alt. 3000 pect, d. 23 Februarii, 1877, coll. T. Sampson. Found hithei-to only in Java and Ceylon. The Ceylon fern (C. P. 3902) given me by Dr. Thwaites as named by Su- William Hooker himself P. lasiosorum, is certamly not distinct, nor has it the long stalk figm-ed by Blume (' Fl. Jav. Fil.' t. 46, f. 6) on which its distinction was mainly based. Thwaites' C. P. 3921, P. jjcirasiticum, var. latiusculum (not j^^^osmsculum, as misnamed by Mr. Wall, • Cat. of Ceylon Ferns,' p. 7) appears to me distmct from the species to which it is referred, and nearer the present one. 56. Pohjpodktm lineare, Thunb. In m. Siao-wu-tai-shan, Jul., 1876, coll. W. Hancock. Although occurrmg in Japan, and at various points along the Chinese coast, this is, I beheve, the most northerly point on the Asiatic mamland where it has been hithei*to gathered. The Eussian writers and Milde do not mention it as occiuTing in the Peking district, Manchui-ia, or Siberia. 57. Cijstopteris montana, Link. In m. Siao-wu-tai-shan. W. Hancock. This is the first record of this fern from Eastern Asia, so far as I am aware. The specimens agree perfectly with Norwegian ones. 58. Cystopjieris fragilis, Bemh. Cum priore. 59. Woodsia glabella, K. Br. Cum duabus prsBcedentibus. Now first recorded from China, but it had been previously found in Dahmia, Siberia, and Sachalin. 60. Hymenophylliim (§ Glabra^) emersum, Baker. In rupibus summi montis Tai-mo-shan (mons ingens molarum) adversus Hongkong, alt. 3000 ped., d. 23 Februarii, 1877, coll. T. Sampson. Only known j)reviously fi'om Ceylon and Mamitius. NOTES ON SOME SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. By THE Kev. W. Moyle Piogeks. I. — Inland. All the plants recorded here have been observed by me in the course of the last twelve months in the parish of Trusham, or its immediate neighbourhood. Trusham is a small j^arish of between 700 and 800 acres, lying about midway between Exeter and Dart- moor, on the south-west slope of the Haldon Hills, the crests of which rise between it and the nearest sea-coast, nine miles distant, at Dawlish. It has for its contiguous parishes Hennock and Christowe on the west, with the river Teign as boundary between, Chudleigh on the south and east, and Ashton on the north. The * Confr. Prantl, Untersuchung. z. Morphologie d. Gefasskryptogamen. I. Hymenophyllaceen, p. 54. 16 SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. soil (the Ordnance Geological Chart is my authority) is carboni- ferous, with greenstone cropping up here and there, limestone occasionally to the south-east of Chudleigh, and granite above Hennock ; while to the west of Bovey Tracey (a town beyond Hennock, and five miles by road from Trusham) lie the "Bovey Beds" (Lignites and Clays). This last-named district, known in the neighbourhood as the Bovey Heathfield, is said to be rich in interesting plants ; but I have as yet visited it only once, and that so early as May. The semi-maritime character of the flora of Trusham parish appears to me to be its most marked sj)ecial feature, especially when it is remembered that the Haldons intervene between the district and the sea. Eauinicuhis ])anijiorus, Linn. Exceedingly abundant on open down and in stony field throughout the district, and quite a feature in the flora — especially as the foliage keeps freshly green through the greater part of the year. Also very common on the coast of South-east Devon, near Sidmouth, at Budleigh Salterton, and on Dawlish Warren. Cardamine imjmtiens, Linn. Li " Teign Lane," Trusham, where it was discovered by Mr. T. E. Archer Briggs in May last, while the plants were still only an inch or two high. Long known by the Eev. H. Eoberts at Ashton, in a lane parallel to Teign Lane, but from two to three miles to the north of it ; and on his authority recorded for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' In Teign Lane this year it flowered freely, from the middle of June to the end of September, along the dry bushy bank for a quarter of a mile or more. Barharea intermedia, Boreau. In Trusham, Ashton, and Christowe parishes ; rather frequent in waste spots and in rocky ground, especially by the river Teign ; but never many plants together. B. pracox, Brown, is often to be seen near it, but is most abundant in the borders of stony fields. Teesdidia nudicaidis, Brown. Very common throughout the district in bare rocky ground, and not infrequent in thin copses. Viola odorata, Linn, (with purple flowers). Very abundant at the Chudleigh Piocks, but occurs nowhere else in the district, so far as I have yet seen. The more common variety (b. alha of Lond. Cat., ed. 7) is faMy general in woods and lanes. The lilac form, which on chalk in Dorset and South Wilts I have always found (without difficulty, though usually in small quantity) growing with the purple and the white, seems quite absent here. The Chudleigh Piocks are also remarkable for the great abundance of V. Bciclu'uhacldana to be found there — almost to the exclusion of the more general V. Blviniana ; the exact reverse of this being true at Trusham, Ashton, and apparently elsewhere in the district. Viola lactea, Sm. Common on the Bovey Heathfield, on Knighton Heath (which is a continuation of Bovey Heath), and on similar ground near. "With it, but (so far as I observed) only on the drier and more strictly heathy spots, occurs a form which I suppose to be the var. b. intermedia of 'Lond. Cat.,' ed. 7. SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. 17 Bianthtis Armeria, Linn. The only species, I believe, for which Trusham is named in ' Flora Devoniensis.' Eather frequent in stony bushy ground in Teign Lane and elsewhere in the parish. It lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Stellaria aquatica, Scop. Trusham. Only two or three plants along one of the little streams flowing into the Teign. Sagina subulata, Wimm. On Haldon Hill and on Bovey Heathfield. On the south-east Devon coast only at Dawlish Warren, and (in but one spot, though in good quantity there) on Peak Hill, near Sidmouth. Hypericum linariifolium, Vahl. On rocks in Trusham and Christowe. The Trusham Station is not more than a quarter of a mile from the Teign. It is of very limited extent, but had probably as many as thirty plants of this rare St. John's wort in flower from the middle of June until the beginning of October. At the Christowe Station — a rocky '' Cleave" on the opposite side of the river, and more than a mile from its bank — there were hundreds of most luxuriant plants in July. There is no previous record, so far as I can learn, of either of these stations. The one given on the Teign in Mr. Eavenshaw's ' List' (" near Dunsford Bridge") is several miles further up the river. It apjpears to me particularly well figured in Bentham's ' Illustrated Hand-book of the British Flora;' and the opening words of his description — " Intermediate in some measure between the trailing H. and the commo7i H." — give a good idea of its appearance when flowering. But " seldom above eight or ten inches high" does not apply to the Christowe plants, which run up freely to eighteen inches or more ; though it is true of those which grow on the more exjDosed rock at Trusham. In both stations, the leaves at first are only very slightly (if at aU) revolute ; they have the midrib very pro- minent beneath, are somewhat glaucous in hue, and remarkably blunt, narrowing only slightly from base to point. The stems appear to be uniformly ascending — never erect as in H. 2)erforatum, Linn., nor prostrate as in H. humifusum, Linn., and (I should be disposed to add) obscurely two-edged, though authorities seem agreed in calling them terete. There is a rigid look about the whole plant, and a regularity of outline in the leaves and in the especially bright j^ellow petals, which mark the species off at first sight from all other British ones. The peculiar resinous smell so characteristic of the Tutsan is very strong in this species. Hypericum hirsutum, Linn. Nowhere in the district, except near Chudleigh ; there it is frequent. Geranium pusillum, Linn. One of the commonest species at Trusham, in all the barer fields and stony waste places ; also in the parishes of Ashton and Doddiscombe Leigh (next beyond to the north-wes-t), and on the Chudleigh Eocks. Geranium lucidum, Linn. The extreme abundance of this is quite another feature in the flora of the district, and one that can hardly fail to catch the eye of even non-botanical observers. 18 SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. Covering wall and liedgebank, and occupying every favourable spot in the woods. Geranium Eobertianiun, Linn., var. b. modestum. Well-marked specimens of this variety from the immediate neighbourhood of the Christowe Hypericum liuariifolium. There were plants of typical G. Robertianum growing close by, and I could see nothing in the respective situations of the two forms to account for the variation. Is there any other distinctly inland station on record for it ? Here it cannot be less than ten miles from the sea coast. Oxalis corniculata, Linn. I cannot but regard this as truly indigenous at Trusham. Elsewhere in South Devon, as also in West Cornwall and Dorset, it has always seemed to me a mere garden "escape." But in Trusham it not only occurs in con- siderable quantity in three of the lanes, but I also find it on a bare furzy down, where it certainly looks quite as much a " native" as the Ptumex Acetosella, Sediim aiujlicum, and Geranium pusillum, which grow beside it. This plant finds no place in * Topogr. Bot.' Trifolium suhterraneum, Linn. Kemarkably abundant in South-east Devon generally, and in Trusham and its neighbour- hood especially. In Trusham the turf, wherever undisturbed, is as a rule full of it, almost to the exclusion of the commoner species — T. pratense, Linn., and T. repens, Linn. In some of the more stony fallows, however, and on the open downs, T. fiUformey Linn., and T. glomeratimi, Linn., dispute the ground with it. T. striatum, Linn., T. arvense, Linn., and T. p)^'ocumhens, Linn., are also frequent ; T. minus, Eelhan, is to be met with every- where in lane, and wood, and field border ; while in one or two bare rocky spots at Trusliam, and at the Chudleigh Eocks, T. suffo- catum, Linn., is in as great quantity as almost any other species. T. scabrum, Linn., I have found nowhere in the district but at the last-named station ; there, too, it is abundant with most of those named above. 2\ lnjbridam, Linn., is rapidly spreading through the district. T. medium, Linn., I have as yet observed only in Ashton parish, near the Teign. Lotus tenuis, Kit. Inland in South Devon, only near Oak- lands, in Chudleigh parish, where it seems thoroughly establislied, but I suspect only as an escape from cultivation. At Exmouth, and near Woodbury Eoad Station (between Exmouth and Exeter) it grows freely along the border of salt marshes. Does this betray a special liking on its part for the seaside ? or has the proximity of a railway station in each instance anything to do with it ? The extremest form of this plant that I remember to have seen was in a somewhat similar situation, viz., between the railroad and the backwater at Weymouth, from the very rails to the water's edge. Lotus aufiustissimus, Linn. Very common in Trusham, Ashton, and Hennock parishes, in company with some of the rarer trefoils named above ; especially on open downs and in rocky bushy places and borders of stony fields. In some of these stations it SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. 19 can hardly be less than a distance of eleven or twelve miles from the sea. I should be glad to learn how far inland this little Lotus and TrifoHum suffocatum, Linn., have been found by other botanists. Mr. Briggs (in Journ. Bot. for Nov. 1874, p. 328) says that about Plymouth he has never seen either L. angustissimus, Linn., or L. hispidus, Desf., "at more than three-quarters of a mile from salt water." The latter species I have met with at only one South-east Devon station, — on high ground near the left bank of the Otter, at about a mile from the river's mouth, on just such a spot as he speaks of for it, " old unbroken land patched with furze." Oniithopus perpusillus, Linn. This species and Sedum anglicum, Huds., and two or three of the trefoils (especially T. glomeratuin and T. striatum, or T. arvetise), are the almost unfailing companions of Teesdalia nudicaidis, Brown. A little careful search, especially if there is a furze bush near for shelter, will generally add a plant or two of Conjdalis claviculata, DC, — a very local species in my experience in the south-west of England. Latlujrus NissoUa, Linn. In Trusham parish, on bushy rocky ground above the Teign ; but apparently in no great quantity. Potentilla ptrocumhens, Sibth. In Trusham, Chudleigh, and Ashton parishes ; on roadside banks, not uncommon. This plant lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.,' and Mr. Briggs tells me that he has not met with it in the neighbour- hood of Plymouth. In some stations I have found P. reptans, Linn., close by, and occasionally a form somewhat intermediate between these two ; but where I have seen P. Tormentilla, Schenk., I have always looked for procmnhens in vain. Potentilla argentea, Linn. There is, I believe, no record of this having been found in Devonshire previous to my discovery of it at Trusham just a year ago. Singularly enough it is quite frequent in this parish, where I now know at least six distinct stations for it at some distance from each other ; and yet beyond the parish I have so far searched for it in vain. It likes situations similar to those in which I find Dianthus Armeria, Linn., ^. e. rocky bushy banks and the corners of stony fields. Pyrus torminalis, Ehrh. At the Chudleigh Bocks, and by road- side and in wood in Hennock and Chudleigh parishes. Probably not uncommon elsewhere in the district, as I may easily have overlooked it in mistake for Acer campestre, Linn., (which is very common in this part of the county), especially as I have not found it in flower, perhaps from its being usually cut back too soon. Epilohium lanceolatum, S. & M. Mr. Briggs pointed out to me some young plants of this species in May last on the Chudleigh side of the little " Bramble Brook," which separates that parish from Trusham. At about a mile from that station we afterwards came upon it in Hennock parish, and a day or two after we saw it in considerable quantity in and about Bovey Tracey. I have since found very handsome specimens of it in Christowe parish, in the same " Cleave" which produces Hypericum, linariifolium. in 20 SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. sucli abundance, and by the Teign ; and again, six or seven miles north-east of that, on a high bank by the roadside between Ide and Exeter, less than a mile from the city. Epilohium tctrai/onum, Linn. In Ashton and Chudleigh parishes ; frequent near the town. CaUitriche obtusangida, Le Gal. Found by Mr. Briggs and myself in a deep pool by the Teign in Ashton parish, and in another pool by the same river below Chudleigh Bridge. Not recorded for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Petroselinum secjetum, Koch., and Sison Amomum, Linn. Both frequent in the district ; as also about Exmouth and Lympstone. (Enmithe pimpinelloides, Linn. Frequent through the district in meadows, and occasionally in dry bushy places. It is also certainly not very rare along the south-east Devon coast, as I have found it on the cliffs at Salcombe Hill, near Sidmouth ; at Budleigh Salterton, at Exmouth, and between Lympstone and Topsham. At Exmouth I was surprised to find an unmistakable specimen of it in a salt marsh. ToriJis infesta, Spreng. In the parishes of Trusham and Ashton ; but so far as I have seen only in cultivated fields. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Charophylhim Authriscus, Lam. This species, certainly un- common or very local in the south-west of England, is to be found in considerable quantity in a waste spot or two in Trusham parish. The only other station in the county where I have seen it is between Mount Pleasant and Dawlish Warren. Smyrnium Olusatrum, Linn. Well established in and about Trusham Churchyard, and at Ashton. A garden "escape?" By the sea I have seen it near Dawlish, Lympstone, Exmouth, and Budleigh Salterton. Viburnum Lantana, Linn. At the Chudleigh Kocks, and near Kingsteignton (between Chudleigh and Newton Abbot) ; but it appears to be rare in the district, though frequent farther east in the county. V. Opulus, Linn., is much more general. lUibia peregriiia, Linn. I have not yet been able to find this in Trusham ; but it is frequent in the contiguous parishes on all sides, Chudleigh, Ashton, and Christowe. Galium tricorne, With. In cultivated fields at Trusham and Ashton. Introduced with seed ? Not recorded for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' VaJcnancUa carinata, Lois. Found by Mr. Briggs, and by him pointed out to me, in great quantity on a roadside wall by 13ovey Tracey ; but I have not been able to discover it elsewhere in the district. Finds no place in 'Topogr. Bot.,' and in ' Lond. Cat.' is printed in italics only, as not an admitted "native" of the British Isles. Valerianella Auricula, DC. Not uncommon in the imrishes of Trusham and Ashton ; indeed I have seldom looked for it in vain wherever in this district I have found the commoner species, V. dent at a, Koch., in any abundance. SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. 21 Cardials te?imjlorus, Curt. At Asliton and Trnsham, abundant. Picris hieracioides, Linn. Asliton and Hennock. Mentha gentilis, Linn. At Hennock, in rocky bushy gi'ound near Bott Tor. Finds no place as a species in ' Topogr. Bot.' 2Ielittis Melk^ophijllum, Linn. Frequent in the district. Myosotis palustris, With. I have looked in various x^arts of the district for this species, but so far in vain. M. ccespitosa, Schultz., is the usual wet land form; but I have found J/, repeiis, Don., in one meadow on the Hennock side of the Teign, and at Christowe. Primula officinalis, Linn., and Phmtar/o media, Linn., are apparently also absent from the district ; far the commonest Plantago in all the unenclosed and wilder parts being P. Coro- nopus, Linn. Fiumex pulcher, Linn. Frequent at Trusham and at the Chudleigh Eocks. Carpinus Betulus, Linn. Occurs rather frequently in the parishes of Trusham and Chudleigh, on Haldon Hill, and by the Pliver Teign. How far it may claim to be indigenous in most or in any of these stations I do not feel competent to say. In ' Toj)ogr. Bot.' South Devon is one of the many vice-counties bracketed at the end of the records for this tree with the note — " Eecorded, but usually as an ahen." Spiranthes autumnalis. Rich. On an open down at Trusham and at Ashton. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Luzula Forsteri, DC. Very abundant ; indeed quite the commonest Luzula throughout the district. L. pilosa, Willd., occurs on Chudleigh Eocks, and (somewhat sj)aringly) in other parts of Chudleigh parish. But elsewhere in the district, except on Haldon Hill, I have not hitherto met with it, L. Forsteri taking its place in wood and lane. Scirpus sylvaticus, Lmn. By the Eiver Teign, in Trusham and Ashton parishes. Carex lavigata, Sm. One of the commonest Carices through- out the district, as apparently in other parts of South Devon. Gastridium lendigerum, Gaud. Li Trusham parish, on a dry bank by the roadside ; a good many plants, but in a very confined station. On a heath, however, between Trusham and Ashton, and also all over a stony field near it, it grows in the greatest profusion. On the south-east Devon coast I know only one station for it — at Exmouth, near the cricket-ground. Agrostis setacea, Curtis. A frequent grass throughout the district, and where found usually most abundant. Arena pubescens, Linn., is ai)parently absent, as well as the rarer A. pratensis, Linn. Poa nemoralis, Linn. Frequent at Trusham, Christowe, and the Chudleigh Eocks. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in * Topogr. Bot.' Foa compressa, Linn. On dry banks in Teign Lane. Trusham. Triticum caninum, Huds. In a wood by the Chudleigh Eocks 22 SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. iu some quantit3\ Lacks personal authority for South Devon in 'Topogr. Bot; Asplcnium scptentrionale, HulL On high rocks between Chud- leigh and Dartmoor — a station discovered by the Rev. H. Eoberts several years ago, and kindly shown by him to me in July last. Not recorded for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Asplenium lanceolatum, Huds. On granite rocks in Hennock parish. Aspidium aculeatum, Sw. On shady banks in Hennock and Dunchideock parishes, but very scarce ; the common species of this genus in this district, as apparently in South-east Devon generally, being A. angulare, Willd. II. — Maritime. The following records are the result, not of a twelve months' stay in one place, but of occasional visits to different points on the coast from Axmouth to Dawlish, made at uncertain intervals from 1872 to 1877 ; but chiefly (from Sidmouth as a centre) in the sx^ring of 1876, and (from Exmouth as a centre) in the early part of August, 1877. Some of the less common plants observed during these visits are mentioned with maritime as well as inland stations in the preceding notes ; and to these no further reference is made in what follows here. Nuphar liitea, Sm. In the Eiver Clyst, by the village of Clyst St. Mary, near Topsham ; frequent. The same river is given for it in ' Flora Devoniensis.' Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Cramhe maritima, Linn. Cliffs between Sidmouth and Sal- combe Beach ; fairly abundant, but mostly out of reach, in May, 1876. Station given in ' Flora Devoniensis.' Diplotaxis tenuifolia, DC. Exmouth Harbour ; a few plants. Cochlearia anglica, Linn. In great abundance on the left bank of the River Axe, between the village of Axmouth and the mouth of the river. Also near Ottermouth, and by the stream at Wood- bury Road station. Cerastium semidecandrum, L. This chickweed, so rare about Plymouth (see Journ. Bot., No. 143, p. 32), and which in ' Topogr. Bot.' is queried for South Devon, is exceedingly abundant on Dawlish Warren and at Budleigh Salterton. It is also to be found in some quantity, and of very large size, near the top of Salcombe Hill, Sidmouth ; but both in that neighbourhood and in most parts of the South-east Devon coast it appears much less general than the very common C. tetrandrum, Curt., which also prevails inland, on Haldon Hill and at the Chudleigh Rocks, where C. semidccavdrum seems wholly absent. C. pinnilum, Curt., which Mr. Townsend has found near Torquay, I have looked for in vain further east. On Dawlish Warren the unfailing companion of C. semidecandrum is the SteUaria media, b. BorcEuna. Hypericum montanum, L. Frequent between Sfiaton and Beer. Malva rotundifolia, L. This mallow, which Mr. Briggs SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. 23 speaks of (in Journ. Bot., Dec. 1873, p. 374) as " an uncommon plant in South-west Devon," I have as yet found only on Exmouth Sands in South-east Devon. Puidiola millegrana, Sm. On Dawlish Warren with Centunculus minimus. Erodium moschatum, Herit. At Dawlish, near the Coast-guard Station, and (with E. cicutariwn) on the sands near Exmouth Harhour. Medicago macidata, Sibth. Abundant at Exmouth, Sidmouth, and Dawlish "Warren. Ax3j)arently general on South-east Devon coast. Also in great quantity at the Chudleigh Rocks. Trifjonella ornithopodioides, DC. At Seaton and on Dawlish AVarren. Trifolium fragifermn, L. Borders of salt marshes at Ex- mouth and Budleigh Salterton. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in 'Topogr. Bot.' T. scabrum is abundant at Seaton and Exmouth : T. striatum on Salcombe Hill (Sidmouth) ; and T. sidjterrcmeum on most parts of the South-east Devon coast. Vicia bithynica, L., with b. awjustifolia intermixed, is fairly abundant at Salcombe Beach (east of Sidmouth) ; between Ex- mouth and Strait Point ; and on the other side of Exmouth, between it and Lympstone. Lathyrus Aphaca, L., which lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.,' and L. syl- vestris, L. (abundant also on "the Landslip " to the east of Axmouth) grow with this vetch on Salcombe Beach, and in the ravine there opening to the sea. I also found one plant of L. Ajjhaca on the cliffs on Peak Hill to the west of Sidmouth. In ' Flora Devoniensis ' " Cliffs near Sidmouth" is one of two Devon stations given for it. CEnanthe Lachenalii, Gmel. Among Juncus maritimus between Lympstone and Toi^sham, and on Dawlish Warren. Centaurea Calcitrapa, L. In a sandy field by the sea to the east of Exmouth, as recorded in ' Flora Devoniensis.' There were several tall much-branched plants there in August, 1877. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Hypochceris glabra, L. In considerable quantity on Dawlish Warren and at Exmouth (near the Harbour). Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Erythraa pulchella, Fries. At Exmouth and on Dawlish Warren ; also inland on a heath between Trusham and Ashton. CJdora perfoliata, L. On Salcombe Beach, to the east of Sid- mouth. Apparently a rare plant in South-east Devon. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Veronica Anagallis, L. Appears to be quite local in South-east Devon, where I have found it only by the Eiver Clyst (near Top- sham) and near Exmouth ; both which stations are named for it in * Flora Devoniensis.' Lithospcrmumpurpureo-cccrideum, L. Overrunning dense thickets in the ravine (referred to above) which opens to the sea at Sal- combe Beach. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' 24 SOUTH-EAST DEVON PLANTS. Cynoglossum officinale, L. On the ''Landslip " to the east of Axmouth, and at Seaton. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Statice Limonium, L. Near Exmouth, between Lymp stone and Topsham ; and on Dawlish Warren. Li the last-named station, on sand washed by high tides, grows in plenty a singularly stunted form, from one and a half to three inches high, with leaves mostly less than an inch long, and very compact inflorescence. Quite near, but amongst masses of Junciis maritwius, the species runs up to a height of seven or eight inches or more, having the lower branches mostly flowerless, and (in some of the specimens) remark- ably lax spikelets, reminding one of S. bahusiensis. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Salicornia radicans, Sm. Spreads for some distance on the north side of Dawlish Warren, over sand washed by high tides. It is not recorded for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot. ;' nor has it, I believe, been reported from either Devon or Cornwall. Between it and the drier part of the Warren occur in great quantity both typical S. herbacea, L., and its variety b. procumbens. Chenopodiuni olidum, Curt. Very common at Exmouth, where C. murale, L., also occurs in some quantity about the Harbour. Euphorbia Paralias, L. Exmouth sands, near the Harbour ; a few plants only. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in * Topogr. Bot.' Zostera marina, L., b. angustifolia. Abundant between Ex- mouth and Lympstone, as reported in Mr. Eavenshaw's * List.' The species lacks personal authority for South Devon in * Topogr. Bot.' Sagittaria sagittifoUa, L. In the Kiver Clyst; near Clyst St. Mary ; as reported in ' Flora Devoniensis.' Queried for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Trichoncma Columna, Picich. Very abundant in its well-known station, DawHsh Warren, in 1876 and 1877. Allium vincale, b. bulbiferum. On the sands between Exmouth and Strait Point, frequent. Schanus nigricans, L. Clayey banks at Salcombe Beach, east of Sidmouth. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Carex distans, L., and C. extensa, Good. In salt marshes at Budleigh Salterton and Exmouth; the latter very abundant at Exmouth (the station given for it in * Flora Devoniensis'), as also between Lympstone and Topsham. EcJiinochloa Crus-galU, Beauv., and Setaria viridis, Beauv. Together on waste ground near some new buildings at Exmouth. Phlciim armariuvi, L. Abundant on Dawlish Warren and Exmouth sands. Lacks personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' Festuca vniglwnis. Soland. On Exmouth sands, as reported in ' Flora Devoniensis ;' near the flagstaff. F. rubra, b. arenaria, is also abundant at Exmouth and along the neighbouring coast. Both lack personal authority for South Devon in ' Topogr. Bot.' SHORT NOTES. 25 Triticum jnnceum, L. This, which as a segregate has no record for South Devon in * Topogr. Bot.,' is abundant on the sands at Exmouth and in the neighbourhood, and also on Dawhsh Warren. With it near Exmouth are, at least, two other distinct maritime forms of Triticum which I believe to be T. pungens, Pers., and the littoral form of T. repens {T. littoreum, Schum.). What appears to me yet another form occurs in some quantity on the sands between Exmouth and Strait Point, and this I think may be T. acuUnn, DC. But, I should add, the only maritime form of this genus which I feel able clearly to identify is T. jimceum proper. Lepturus Jiliformis, Trin. Frequent at Exmouth, Dawlish Warren, and Budleigh Salterton. Elymus arenarius, L. Apparently absent now from South Devon. My search for this rare grass and for Euphorbia Peplis, L., (both reported in * Flora Devoniensis' for Exmouth,) was very close there and on Dawlish Warren in August last ; but it proved wholly unsuccessful. SHOKT NOTES. EosA MOLLIS, Sin., &c., IN NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. — By the borders of Plain Woods, five miles west of Northampton, Rosa mollis occurs plentifully, not only in the hedgerows, but also about the wood itself. This Eose appears to be more widely distributed than was formerly considered. Mr. Baker has named some Eoses that I have gathered during the year in this county. They include Rosa coriifoUa, Fries., from hedgerows between Gayton and Eothers- thorpe ; R. arvatica, Bak., stone-pit near Northampton ; R. verticilla- cantha, Merat, (not the type) from the Nene Banks ; R. imj^lexa, Gren., east slopes of Boro Hill at about 400 feet. R. tomentella, L., about Gayton. R. pimpinellifoUa, L., is frequent near the top of Boro Hill, about 750 feet ; and also grows sparingly in Harleston Firs. Pl. micrantha, Sm., is not infrequent in Whittlewood and the other Forests. — G. C. Druce. Parinarium DiLLENiFOLiuM, R. Bv. — Steudel has quoted from Wallich (Cat. 7520) the name of this species, which he gives as a synonym of Petrocarya dillenifolia, Steud. The type-specimen consists merely of three leaves gathered by Wallich himself " in montibus Peuang." I thmk there can be no doubt that these leaves belong to a plant of very different affinity, namel3% Biptcrocarpus cornutus, Dyer, Fl. Brit. Ind. i. 296, the diagnosis of which is founded on fruitmg specimens collected by Maingay at Malacca. — W. T. Tkiselton Dyer. '26 NOTICES OF JJOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Nottccs of Booifts aittr itttwotrs. Guide du Botanhte en Beh/iqiw (planter civantes et fossil es J. Par Feancois Ckepin. Bruxelles : Mayolez. Paris : Bailliere. (Sm. 8vo, i3p. 494). This book is plaunecl somewhat on the hues of the first vohime of M. Germain de Saint-Pierre's ' Guide du Botaniste,' pubhshed at Paris in 1852, and is intended to form a handbook of instruction and general botanical information, especiaUy for those commencing the study. The book is divided into two parts, the first relating to Botany generally, the second to Belgium exclusively. In the former we find successively treated of — excursions, the collection of plants, the formation of herbaria, exchanges, waiting for pub- lication and the correction of printers' proofs ; then follow direc- tions for the study of the anatomy and physiology of X3lants, theii* geography, and a classified catalogue of the books, i^eriodicals, &c., most useful in a botanist's library. The study of fossil plants follow^s, and is treated in the same order at considerable length : this is a novel feature in works of this description. The second part is of more interest, and though devoted to Belgium must prove useful to botanists of other countries. We have first a succinct history of the progress of Botany in Belgium from the beginning of the sixteenth century to the present time, and this is followed by an account of the existmg museums, gardens, libraries, and otlier botanical establishments of the country. The botanical geography of Belgium is exhibited in a very interesting essay, wdiich occupies a considerable space, and is followed by lists of species to be found during excursions into the various districts. In connexion with this portion of the book is a complete catalogue of all the fossil plants of Belgium at j)resent know^n, and indications of the principal localities where they may be obtained. The volume concludes with a general classified bibliography of the books and papers of Belgian botanists, which occupies 67 pages. Most young botanists have felt the want of some such guide as this w^hen entering alone, as so many do, on a study which appears to bristle with difficulties. M. Crepin's book well supplies wdiat is wanted ; there is room for one of a similar character intended for English readers. H. T. Introduction to Botanic Teachings at the Schools of Victoria. By Baron Feed, von Muellek, Government Botanist. Mel- bourne, 1877. (8vo, i3p. 152). This little book is deserving of note and commendation. It is intended as an introduction to the study of plants in elementary schools, the author's experience having convinced him that the NRTICES 01'^ BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 27 only method of rencleriug such study " agreeable and lastingly fruitful" consists in arousing the pupils' interest in the discrimi- nation of the native plants of their locality. A ' Victorian School- Flora,' commenced by the author with this object, is postponed for the publication of this more elementary treatise. In this each large Order of the flora of Victoria is taken up and described in a plain but attractive manner. The Gum-trees [Eucah/2)tm), as forming the chief timber-trees of the Australian Continent, are taken first, and other Victorian genera of Myrtacea follow. The second chapter is devoted to the Wattles [Acacia) and other Legu- mmos(B ; the third to the She-oaks [Casicarina), and so on through twenty-two chapters. The subjects are well illustrated by clear large woodcuts, mostly copied from the plates of the author's ' Plants of Victoria ' : most of these are of course quite unfamiliar, even by name, to the majority of English botanists ; and indeed it cannot fail to strike all as remarkable to see species unknown to Science withm the lifetime of the present generation now used as illustrations of elementary facts in a book for school-children. In Europe we have become accustomed to the well-known stock illustrations ; but it is natural and right that our colonies should make their own text-books, and use the plants which grow on their own soil. As one of the first productions of its class in a British colony, therefore, the present treatise has a particular interest. ^ H. T. Bdtrdge zur Entwickelunqsqescliichte der Flechten, von E. Stahl, Heft n. (A. Felix, Leipzig, 1877). The first part of this work, which dealt with the CollemacecB, and more especially with the question of then- reproduction, was noticed in the Journal for 1877, p. 284. It will be remembered that the results obtamed were clearly in favour of the sexuality of their reproduction, and as clearly confirmative of Schwendener's discovery as they could well be. In this second part the nature of the Hymenial-gonidia is the subject, and in his cultivation "from spore to spore" of the plants treated of. Dr. Stahl has succeeded in gaining for us a very complete knowledge of these until now little known organisms. That it was Nylander who first called attention to the constant occmTence of these Hymenial-gonidia in the empty spaces of the perithecia of many pyrenocarpous lichens, appears strange when it is made known how ill their life-history agrees with his " anti-Schwendeneristic" views. However, he did little beyond proclaiming their existence ; and Fuisting and Winter were the first to show that the Hymenial-gonidia were the off- spring of the Thallus-gonidia. The part played by them in the vital economy of the lichen still remained unknown, and afforded to one party a subject for speculation and to the other a matter to be rather avoided than otherwise. Dr. Stahl, not contented with speculation, has now investigated them with the following results. In the hymenium of Derinatocarpon SchcBreri, and growing free betAveen the asci, are to be found globular Hymenial- 28 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. gonidia, which differ from the Thalhis-gonidia chiefly in being smaller, and which are cast out of the perithecia along with the riiDe spores. They natm-ally fall in each other's company ; and if this happens on a suitable substratum, the spores germinate and the germ-tubes embrace the Hymenial-gonidia, which soon attain the dimensions of Thallus- gonidia. This is admirably shown on Taf. v. figs. 6, 8, 9, 10. With careful cultivation, a short time sufi&ces for the production of the true Dcnnatocarpon Schccrevi with its characteristic thallus. The baton- shaped Hymenial-gonidia of Polyblastia rugulosa, which agree in their characters with the free algae of the genus Stichococcus, have been observed to act in an exactly similar manner. A small species of Thelidium, until now undescribed, very often accompanies Der- matocarpon SchcBreri, and the gonidia of the former are specifically identical with those of the Dermatocarpon. If the spores alone of the TlielidiuYn be brought together with nothing but the Hymenial- gonidia of the Derinatucarpon, and be cultivated in the most isolated manner, the result is the thallus of the Thelidium complete with its characteristic spore-fructification. The same alga (a species of Plcurococcus) forms, then, the gonidia of these two lichens, i. e., two species of Ascomycetes can consort with the same ah/a. It will not be denied that the above is a very crucial experiment, and, so far as can be seen, there is no reason to doubt its accuracy. Its result is one of the most decided proofs that have been given of the accuracy of Schwendener's views, and goes far to strengthen this already well-grounded doctrine. The carrying up of the Hymenial-gonidia (the offspring of the Thallus-gonidia), their emission along with the spores, and finally their employment as the Thallus-gonidia of the new lichen, form a life-history at once simple and beautiful. G. M. Annates du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg. Publiees par M. le Dr. E. H. C. C. ScHEFFEE, Du-ecteiu' de ce Jardin. Vol. I. Batavia : H. M. Van Dorp et Cie. 1876. (Pp. 182, tl. 30). Though dated October, 1876, this has only lately come to hand. Botanists will welcome it as good evidence that the beautiful gardens at Buitenzorg are being fiu'ther utilized for scientific pur- poses. We have in this handsome volume the second part of Dr. Scheffer's valuable Notes on Palms of the groux") ArecinecB (which seems to have been written as far back as 1875), in which he describes, in their places, new genera under the names Mischo- pJiUcus, GromiplujUum, Iihopalohlaste, PtijcJumdra, and Hctcrospathc, each with a single species. Much of this material appears to have been embodied in Beccari's account of New Guinea and Malayan Palms in his * Malcsia,' noticed in this Journal last year ; and some questions of priority in nomenclature are not unlikely to arise. The paper is illustrated with 30 plates, some of details, but chiefly heliographic portraits of the trees themselves taken in the garden, and very successfully managed. The other contents are : — An enumeration of the plants of New Guinea (superseded by Baron NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 29 von Mueller's more recent one), and on two new species of the cuiious genus Gonocanjuin, both by Dr. Scheffer ; an account by M. Teijsmann of his travels m New Guinea ; and notes by M. Bin- nendijk on ornamental trees cultivated in the Buitenzorg Gardens. It may be mentioned that all the iDapers are in Latin or French. Though the delay in the publication of the volume has been unfor- tunate, its production is very creditable to the colonial press. H. T. Rechcrc.hes sur les On/anes de la Vegetation du SeJa(/inella Martensii, Sprimj. Par M. Teeub. Leide : BriU. 1877. Tms i3aper goes over ground already examined by Pfeffer and others, but with greater fuhiess of detail. Two forms of termmal cell are recognised in the stem, viz., the conical and the pyramidal. The author holds that in their very early state the young branches have not a termmal cell, and also that there is no dichotomous ramification here, as Pfeffer supposes to be the case, but that the branches are monopodes ramifying periodically and forming two rows of lateral members. He finds that the root-bearing axes first appear when the branch near which they are inserted is about half-way between its formation and the commencement of its ramification, and that in the earliest state seen by him they consist of two large cells ; soon, though, they possess a terminal cell shaped like a ' quadi'angular pyramid, afterwards replaced by one having the form of a quadi*angular prism. Details are given of the growth and development of the stems, root-bearing axes, roots and leaves. S. M. Histoire des Drogues d'Origine Vegetale. Par F. A. FLiicKiGER et D. Hanbury. Traduction de I'ouvrage Anglais ' Pharmaco- graphia' augmentee de tres nombreuses notes par le Dr. J. L. DE Lanessan, avec une preface par H. Baillon, et 320 figures. Paris : Octave Dom. 1878. 2 vols., 8vo. (Pp. 662, 671). A very good French translation of Fliickiger and Hanbury's classical work, which has had the advantage of revision by the former author. In addition, prmted m smaller type, are botanical descriptions of the genera and species mentioned in the text, and detailed accounts of the histology of the drugs, both illustrated with woodcuts, those of minute anatomy being highly satisfactory. A number of additional substances are also described, with the object of rendering the book more complete, or at least better adapted for a text-book in schools of pharmacy and medicine in France. H. T. Contrihuciones a la Flora del Paraguay. By Sign. D. Parodi. The first fasciculus (1877) consists of notes on the Convolvulacem; a sketch of classification in Spanish, and descriptions of species (many new) in Latin. This tract of 32 pages is xmnted at Buenos Ayrcs. 3U NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Flora of Tropical Africa, By D. Olh^r, assisted bv other Botanists. Vol. III. Loudon: L. Reeve. (Pp.544.) This volume was published last October. It contains the orders Iliihcllifcnr and AraUacchanidis,' Fasc. I. LeyiuninostB. Flo- rence, 1877. — CouTANCE, * L'01i\ier, histone, botanique, &c.' Paris, Eothschild. — Blanchere, ' Les ravages des Vergers et des Vignes avec une etude sur le Phylloxera.' Paris, Eothschild. — Just, ' Bo- tanischer Jahresbericht, 1876,' Part i., Berlin, 1878. — W. Bland, ' Elementary Botany,' Part 2. London, Bemrose & Co. (6d.) pkoceedings of societies. 59 Articles in Journals. — December, 1877. Bot. Zeituny. — F. Ludwig, "On tlie cleistogamy of Cullomia (jrandifiora, Dougl.' — V. A. Poiilsen, ' The extra-floral nectary in Batatas edulis.' — E. Askenasy, ' On the annual periods of buds.' Flora. — C. Kraus, ' On the molecular constitution of proto- plasm in dividing and growing cells.' — F.Arnold, ' The Mosses of the French Jura' (continued). — Nylander, 'Addenda nova ad LichenographiaEuropseam ' (fifteennew species, eleven from Ii-eland.) Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. — E. Hackel, 'On a Grass with variable lower pales.' — J. Freyn, ' Verhascuin tomentosum (F. Chaixii x sinu- atum)' — M. Winkler, ' Two hybrid x)lants from Spain.' — A. Kerner, 'Distribution of Hungarian plants ' (continued). — W. Voss, Puccinia Thiimeniana, n. s]^.' — L. Celakovsky, ' Further notes on 2Ielilotiis macrorhizus, W. & K.' — H. Kempf, 'Flora of Vienna.' — K. v. Uechtritz, ' Botanical notes.' — F. Antome, ' Botany of Vienna Exhibition ' (continued). Bot. Notiser. — E. Ahrling, 'Examination mto the MSS. of Linnaeus existing m Sweden.' — A. S. AVinslow, ' Salix- and P^^osa- flora of Goteborg' — ' Swedish Botanical Literature for 1876.' ProcnO(ngs of Sotiettes. British Association for the Advancement of Science, Plymouth, 1877. (Concluded from vol. xv., p. 318.) Aiigust 20. — J. Gwyn Jeffreys, Esq., F.E.S., President, in the chair. — "On the structure of the pitcher of Cephalotus,'" by Prof . Alexander Dickson. [A full abstract of this pa^Der is printed at pp. 1-5.] — Prof. Dickson exhibited a specimen of Pogo7iatum aljnnum with two capsules beneath a single calj^Dtra. There was some doubt, however, whether the calyi^tra were really single. — " On structural characters in relation to habitat in plants," by A. S. Wilson. This was an attempt to show that the external characters of plants were caused by their environment, especially as related to di-ought or humidity. The paper caused much discussion. August 21. — The Kev. W. S. Symonds read an extract from a letter from Prof. 0. Heer, Zurich, to Sir Joseph Hooker, dated 14th Aug. 1877, on the plants collected by Capt. Feilden in the Arctic Expedition. These are of the greatest interest, and give us, in many directions, important conclusions. Of Taxodium distichum tmocenkum not only do the twigs occur, but also the male catkins, as at Cape Staratchin. There are two species of Pinus (seeds and leaves), a leaf and fruit of Ulmus, leaf and bark of Betula prisca and Torellia rigida. TorclUa is a highly remarkable genus, of which Prof. Heer got from Spitzbergen only fragments of 60 PEOCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. leaves. It is no doubt a Taxinea, very near Phccnicopsis of the Jura. The fact of the existence of Nymphmi, of large Grasses, often species of Conifers, of Popuhis, JJetula, Corijlus, Uhmis and Viburnum near 82° N. lat. is very interesting. — ''On the classification of the Vegetable Kingdom," by Prof. W. R. McNab. [Printed in full in J. Bot., 1877, pp. 340-344.]— "The classification of the flowering plants considered phytogenetically," by Prof. McNab. Haeckel's monoiihyletic pedigree of the Vegetable Kingdom, as given in his * History of Creation,' vol. ii. (English edition), was discussed and objections to its conclusions urged. Thus in two cases the groui)s are known to occur earlier than Haeckel's theory requires, in another case (monchlamydeous Dicotyledons) the plants do not appear until much later (in the Cretaceous instead of the Triassic). The geological distribution of Dicotyledons, founded on Schimper's * Paleontologie Vegetale,' was then fully discussed. The general conclusions di'awn were the following : — 1 . That the Gamojjetalce are more recent than the Choripetalcc. 2. That the apetalous orders must be looked upon not as forming a separate group, but as being the lowest members of the subordmate groups of the ChoripetalcB. 3. That the older representatives in the challc of the larger group generally belong to families having variable characters, more especially in regard to the number of the parts of the flower. Thus the oldest representative of Order 69, UinbellijiorcB, is Aralioj^hyllum in the chalk. The Ara- liacece have variable characters, as shown by the formula — Ca(5_io) Co5_ioAn5_ioGn("2i:io), a formula which will include that of the UmbellifercB, viz., Ca5Co5An5Gn(2). 4. That while the Monoco- tyledons are undoubtedly monophyletic, the Dicotyledons are cer- tainly polyphyletic, and hence the great difference seen in the formulae of their flowers. LiNNEAN Society of London. November 15, 1877.— J)i. Gwyn Jeffreys, F.R.S., Vice-President, in the chair. — Dr. Trimen exhibited specimens of Boswellia Cartcrii, Birdw. (foliage and branches), and B. Frereana, Buxlw. (in flower). They were gathered in October last by Mr. J. Collins from the trees planted at Aden, near the tanks. Dr. Trimen made some observa- tions on the varia])ility of the foliage of Boswellia, and expressed an opinion that B. Bhau-Dajiana, Birdw., was not specifically separable from B. Carterii. B. Frereana in its wild state is confined to Somali- land, where it was recently collected by Hildebrandt. It affords the fragrant true resin called *'Luban Meyti," which Hanbury con- sidered to be the African "Elemi;" this is much chewed by Orientals, but rarely imported hito England. B. Carterii yields the well-known " Olibanum," or "Frankincense," and grows wild both in Somali-land and on the south-west coast of Arabia. December 6. — Prof. Allman, F.R.S., President, in the chair. — Mr. Thiselton Dyer exhibited leaves and wood of the Nan-mu tree. This tree grows in Yunnan, between 25° and 26° N. lat., and its wood is highly valued by the Chinese court for building purposes, and by the wealthy for coffins. It forms enormous columns PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 61 in tombs of the Ming dynasty, three hundred years old, and has usually been supposed to be teak. The tree is still botanically indeterminate, but it probably belongs to LauracecB, and the leaves closely agree with those of Phcebe imllida. — Mr. Thiselton Dyer also exhibited and made some remarks on a seed of Kntada scandens, and one possibly belonging to Cyathocalyx Maingayi, an Anonaceous plant, which were found in the ccecum of the lihinoceros sumatrensis from Chittagong which died in the Zoological Gardens, Eegent's Park. Fruits of Oncocarjms vitiensis were likewise shown, these having been obtained from the crop of a fruit-pigeon [Cavjwjjhaga latrans) from Fiji. — Mr. Thiselton Dyer also exhibited part of a fruit-head of a species of Pandanus from India, formmg a brush, of which the fibrous tissue of the drupes constituted the bristles, said to be used to scrape cloth, like the Teazle. — Mr. J. Eliot Howard brought before the meeting living examples of the flowers and foliage of Cincho7ia Calisaya var. Josephiana, and C. Calisaya var. anglica (hybrid), grown in his garden at Tottenham. — Mr. M. Moggridge read a note containing the record of his having met with Daheocia polifolia growing wild on AVallis Down, near Bournemouth, Hants, duruig last summer. Doubtless this has been here accidentally introduced, but it is interestmg as apparently being well established.''' — The Secretary read a paper by Dr. I. Bailey Balfour, entitled " Observations on the Genus Fandamis, with an enumeration of all species described or named m books, herbaria, and nurserymen's catalogues ; together with their synonymy and native countries, as far as these have been ascertained." Few famihes of plants present more difficulties of study and elucidation than the Fandanacea. These difficulties exist by reason of the variability of the species, the barriers in the way of prociuiug the male flowers, and the feeble characters borne by the leaves, while the fi*uit, after di'jdng, in a great measm'e loses its distinctive features, and therefore its value as a means of comparison, &c. The Screw-pmes had attracted the notice of the early voyagers, but their descriptions are by no means good, or enable identification to be made with certainty. To Eumphius we owe the name of Pandanus, though his account and figm-es are poor compared with those of Rheede of a century previous. Linnaeus, though indicatmg a plant under the designation Bromelia sylvestris omitted nevertheless the genus Pandanus, an omission afterwards rectified by his son. Afterwards, as knowledge of species increased, many new genera were unnecessarily introduced, which Dr. Balfour, from his studies and observation, is inclined to reject ; even Brongniart's New Caledonia genera do not claim acceptance. Pandamis runs over a wide expanse of longitude, stretching as it does from the East African coast through the Mascarene Islands, India, the Indian Archipelago, Australia, as far eastward as the Sandwich Islands. The Eastern Archipelago and the Mascarenes, Dr. Balfour regards as centres whose s^^ecies of Pandanus do not commingle. The species of the Mascarene area have frequently red spines on * This Heath has been already recorded from Bournemouth, and also from Southampton. (See Journ. Bot. 1872, p. 277). 62 PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. the margins of their leaves, although this is by no means universal, while with those of the eastern area this is an exception ; with the former the spines on the leaf-edges or midiihs, are seldom recurved, whilst this peculiarity is common with those of the latter. The nomenclature Dr. Balfour finds a source of great trouble, the multi- plication of names by horticultmists giving rise to complexity and confusion. A note on the means of preserving Pandani fruit, &c., and a copious list of species and sjnionymy follow. — The Secretary also read a communication from Dr. J. Stirton, "Notes on the Rev. Mr. Crombie's paper on the Lichens of the 'Challenger' Expedition." December 20. — Prof. Allman, F.R.S., President, in the chair. — Dr. Masters showed a specimen of Colletia cniciata he had that day received in a living state from Sig. Fenzi, of Florence, which was of special interest in connection with those exhibited by Dr. Prior at a previous meeting (see J. Bot. 1877, p. 377), and seemed to throw some light on the history of the plant in question. The remarkable form known as C. cniciata was originally described by the late Sir W. Hooker from native Chilian specimens. Some years after Dr. Luidley received sx)ecimens of the plant from the gardens of Lady PioUe at Bicton, said to have been raised from the seeds of C. spinosa by the gardener, Mr. Barnes, a man of much natural keenness of observation. Dr. Lindley, overlooking the previous pub- lication of the plant, and acce^^ting the statement as to its origin, described and figured it as C. hictonensis, and referred to it as a remarkable case of transformation. When, however, the previous pubhcation of Sir W. Hooker's C. cniciata was remembered, and the specimens examined, it was naturally thought that Mr. Barnes was mistaken in his assertion, and that he had unwittingly sown the seeds of the two species (known to be natives of the same localities). The specimen exhibited by Dr. Masters, however, showed that Mr. Barnes' statement was not necessarily entirely erroneous, for from the same branch i^roceeded shoots with the broad flattened-deltoid spines characteristic of C. cniciata and others, with slender cylindri- cal spines, very similar to, but more slender than, those of C, spinosa. — Mr. Worthington G. Smith exhibited, under the microscope, a specimen of the fossil fungus {Peronosporitcs antiquarius) which he has recently described and figured in the ' Gardeners ' Chronicle,' and made some remarks thereon. He also showed a number of enlarged drawmgs of sections of Fungi, among others that of Boletus suhtomentosus stating that in this typical specimen, five inches in diameter, there are 17,000 pores or tubes. Each pore when cut across showing 2000 cells on the surface. The number of surface- cells on the under side of a specimen is 36,000,000. The cells in an entire plant are calculated to be 61,500,000,000, and the number of spores produced by the same specimen 5,000,000,000. — Mr. Stephen W. Silver exhibited a series of vegetable products, arrows and other instruments, from the Fiji Islands and New Caledonia, collected and forwarded by Mr. Edgar Layard, H.B.M.'s Consul, Noumea. Among the specimens was a quantity of the substance (from the island of Mallicollo) which is said to be used by the natives BOTANICAL NEWS. 68 for poisoning their arrows. The exact composition of this has not yet been ascertained, though it is supposed to be a composition similar to that described by the Eev. Thos. Powell in the ' Journ. Linn. Soc.,' vol. xvi. p. 58 (see J. Bot. 1877, p. 127.) — ''On the Alga fomid during the Arctic Expedition," by Prof. Dickie. This report deals with material collected between 78° and 83° N. lat. by Capt. Feilden, Dr. Moss and Mr. Hart, who accompanied Capt. Sir George Nares. It is noted that of freshwater species there are representatives of fourteen genera, many common to Europe. Of DiatumacecB thu'ty-one genera and seventy species have been identified, most being marine. Seven species of olive- coloured AlgcB are given, but it seems no marine species belonging to the red series were obtained, or at least placed in Prof. Dickie's hands. A comparison of the Algcv of the Spitzbergen seas follows, and full references are made to the pa^Ders of Prof. J. G. Agardh and P. T. Cleve in the 'Transactions' of the Swedish Academy. Uotanual Ntios. A NEW scientific periodical has been commenced in Paris under the title ' Revue international des Sciences,' Dr. de Lanessan being the editor. It appears weekly, and consists of signed articles on all departments of science, and analyses of books and memoirs of importance, reports of scientific societies, and scientific biblio- graphy of all countries; the list of " collaborateurs " is extensive. The price of each number is 50 c, and the imbhsher Octave Doin, 8, Place de I'Odeon, Paris. . We are glad to learn that the second edition of Sh' J. D. Hooker's ' Student's Flora' is well advanced. We also hear that Mr. Bentham has in the j)ress a new edition of his " Handbook of the British Flora.' The publication of the seventh and concluding volume of the ' Flora Australiensis ' is immediately expected. Peof. Eichler, of Kiel, has been appointed to the Professorship of Systematic Botany at Berlin, in the place of Alex. Braun. The Eoyal Horticultural Society has appointed as Assistant- Secretary, Mr. Samuel Jennings, F.E.S., formerly of the Agri- horticultural Society of Bengal. The death is recorded, at Worthing, of the Rev. Thomas Salw^y, Rector of Oswestry. He was well known for his work in the Lichens of this country, and published several pajDers on those of Shropshh'e and the Channel Islands in the ' Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.' and the Edinburgh Botanical Society's Trans- actions. He also issued a valuable series of exsiccata, ' Lichenes Britannici.' He visited Madeh-a, and in 1847 discovered in Guernsey Allium, triquetrum. Andrew Murray died on 10th January, at the age of QQ. He was born in Edinburgh, and was a Writer to the Signet there, 64 BOTANICAL NEWS. and in i3ractice for some years. In 1858 he was president of the Edinburgh Botanical Society, and contributed several papers to the Transactions of that Society. It was not till 1860 that he came to London to occupy the post of assistant- secretary to the Horticultural Society, and has been mtimately connected with its scientific committee since its foundation. Though best known as a zoologist (especially as a very accomplished entomologist), Mr. Murray had a good knowledge of plants, and published in 1863 a volume on the ' Pines and Firs of Japan ' ; he was also engaged on the text of Lawson's ' Pinetum Britannicum,' which is still uncom- pleted. Mr. Mm-ray was a very careful and accurate observer and an acute reasoner, and his loss is deplored by a large circle of friends. We have to record the death of Mr. Samuel Anderson, of Whitby, in Yorkshu-e, an energetic collector and investigator of the mosses and Hepatic® of that district. He was the first to dis- cover Sphagmun molle in this country, and contributed largely to the ' Sphagnacese Britannicae Exsiccatse,' recently issued, the speci- mens prepared by him bearing witness to the care and neatness which marked all the work that passed through his hands. Several species of Hepatic93 recently detected by him are also new to the Yorkshire Flora. We are sorry to have to announce the death of our corres- pondent. Miss Elizabeth Hodgson, of Ulverstone, which took place there on 26th December last, at the age of 64. Her principal contribution to botany was her ' Flora of Lake Lancashire,' which appeared in this Journal in 1874 (New Series, vol. iii. p. 268-296). Lake Lancashne, though politically a part of that county, is physically an appendage of the Lake district, running up from the coast to Coniston water and the west shore of Windermere ; and as its hills rise to a height of 2500 feet, and its geology presents great variety, its botany, which had been little studied systematically since the days of Ray's correspondent, Thomas Lawson, is of much interest. Miss Hodgson recorded nothing but what she had herself seen ; and as she sent her specimens up to London before print- ing to be verified, and afterwards presented her collection to the British Museum, her paper possesses the highest claim to authen- ticity. Many of the species are represented by a large and well- selected series of forms, some of which are of critical interest. For many years she was a member of the Botanical Exchange Club, but lately for some time her health had been very feeble ; she was also an able geologist, and contributed from 1863 down- wards many papers to the ' Journal of the Geological Society,' the ' Geologist,' and the ' Geological Magazine.' Her latest scientific task was, after she was too ill to collect for herself, to make by deputy a collection of the Furness Mosses. Correction in the December number. — In the paper on ' Bermu- dian Ferns,' (p. 367), evervwhere for 1863 read 1843 ; for 1864 read 1844, and for 1865 read 1845. ©rtstnal ^rtttlts. ON THE FLOEAL STKUCTUEE AND AFFINITIES OF SAPOTACE.^. By Marcus M. Hartog, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. In the spring months of 1877 I had the opportunity of following the development of the flower in the following species of Sapotacece, cultivated in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Peradeniya, Ceylon : — Chrysophijllum oliviforme and C. Cawiito, Achras Sapota, Bassia longifoUa, Dasyaulus neriifolius, Mimusops Elengi, and another species near M. jjarvifolia, Br. Since my retm-n to Em-ope I have dissected dried specimens of most of the other genera in the herbaria of the Jardin des Plantes, the British Museum, and Kew, and have found that the results elucidated most of the types of this very peculiar family, and form a strong basis for a prelimmary sketch of its morphology. Eichler, in 1876, attempted this in his ' Bliithendiagramme ' (pp. 331-4), but from dried specimens only, so that he left many problems untouched. Several of his inter- pretations, however, are very sagacious. I may add that the greater part of the substance of this pai3er was worked out in Ceylon, while I have only seen Eichler' s book since my retm'n home. Inflorescence. — This is always axillary. In Achras Sapota the flowers are solitary axillary, forming by their approximation a sort of leafy umbel. By carefully digging out the mass of resin enveloping the terminal leaf-bud, I found that the axillary bud which later forms a flower, at the time when it is a mere hemi- spherical tubercle emits a pah' of lateral outgrowths, the first traces of the bractlets. These, which I had before been altogether unable to find, persist even in the nearly adult flower as minute, elongated, subulate scales at the base of the pedicel, and are caducous with the tomentum m which they are almost buried. In Bassia the (stipulate) leaves are succeeded towards the end of the season by 3-fid bud-scales, closely imbricated. In the axil of most of these is formed a flower-bud, bearing, as in Achras, two lateral bractlets (delicately membranous and very caducous). Either bractlet has another axillary flower-bud, which is, I believe, ebracteolate. Mimusops, sp., has also solitary axillary flowers, but sometimes its bractlets are fertfle as in Bassia. The other plants (/)* have all pau'ed dichasia, each cyme * To save repetition, I add (/) when the development was worked out on the fresh specimen, {d) where only dry flowers were available. N. s. VOL. 7. [March, 1878.] k 66 FLORAL STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF SAPOTACE^. being axillary to one of the opi^osite scales which are the first production of the shoot axillary to the foliage leaf. The bractlets are here always present, coriaceous, often caducous ; and, as they are always at the very base of the pedicel, the adult inflorescence is described as fascicled. The primary axillary shoot on which these pau'ed fascicles are formed may remain dormant altogether, or grow out sooner or later into an inno- vation. Calyx. — This is quincuncial in number, order of appearance of individual parts, and imbrication in the adult flower in both species of Ckrysophyllum. Sepal 1 is between the parent axis and the right bractlet, 2 between the axis and the left bractlet, and 4 is posterior. In the remaining species (/) the calyx consists of two equal alternating, successive whorls — 2-merous in Bassia and Dasyaulm, 8-merous in Achras, 4-merous in both species of Mimusops. The outer sepals, when two in number, alternate with the bractlets ; when three, two are an tero -lateral, and the thhd posterior ; when four, two are antero-, two postero-lateral. In all the other species the calyx falls under one or other of the above categories. Corolla. — With this organ begins the multiphcation of parts so much affected by this Order. In Chr y soph y Hum, however, as in several TernstrccmiacecB, the petals are quincuncial in origin,"' like the sepals wdth which they alternate, but in the contrary direction. Petal 1 is between sepals 1 and 3, or 1 and 4. In all the others (/) the corolla begins by a simultaneous whorl, isomerous and alternating with the calyx as a whole. This is aD that we have in Achras and Mimusojys. In Bassia, a second isomerous whorl is formed, alternating with the former, and at first internal to it, though soon appearing as if intercalated. In Dasyaulus, after the formation of the four alternisepalous petals, the receptacle broadens, and another petal forms in front of cither inner sepal, raising the number to six. In Lucuma itiaryinata, L. curvifolia, &c., (d), six petals succeed four sepals ; but here two are external and in front of the outer sepals, and then come the four alternisepalous ones. The so-called outer petals of Mimusops (_/'), as of Imhricaria, Lahramia, Eichleria, gen. nov.,t Bumelia and DipJioUs (d), were for the first time correctly interpreted as stiimles {" yebeiibldttchcji'') by Eichler. My own observations are as follows :-- After the appearance of both androecium and pistil, when the true petals are already closely imbricated, a horizontal thickening appears outside and just above the base of each petal. Owing to lateral bulgings, this thickened bar soon appears depressed in the centre. Each bulging then enlarges, and outstrips for the time the parent * As 1 judge from their relative size at the first raoment when 1 was able to sec the petaline tubercles at all ; but I never found less than five present, or clsr no petals at all. + See Ain'EM>ix. FLORAL STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF SAPOTACE.E. 67 petal. In tlie adult flower these appendages are so arranged that each appears to pan- with its neighbour of the next petal, so that they form paria sepalis superposita. But in all the species of these genera that I have dissected, fresh or diy, the true petals were invariably and exactly alternisepalous, a relation seen by Eichler, but contradicted or passed over by most other writers. Andr(ecium. — In all the species examined fresh, and probably in a vast majority of the species of the Order, the androecium is truly diplostemonous. Next the petals comes an equal simul- taneous alternating whorl of stamens, and then is formed an alternipetalous set internal to the former." In Mimusops and Achras the alternipetalous set become sterile staminodes ; in Chrysophyllum they appear as tubercles, but soon abort altogether, leaving no trace. I have seen a third whorl in one or two adult flowers of Bassia longifolia. In Lahourdonnaisia (d), where the corolla is biseriate, the two sets of stamens continue the alternation of the petaline whorls. In Payena [d) (including Cacosmcmthus and Ceratophorm), the same is the case ; but then a thnd doubled inner whorl of stamens is formed, alternating with the individual members of both sets f (see formula below.) The androecium requires further study in certain species of Bassia | and Pycnandra, Cryptogyne and Omphalocarpum. Through- out the Order the petals soon become connate with one another and the stamens by the upgrowth of a podium or " corolla-tube." Gyn^cium. — The carpels form a single verticil, and are usually isomerous and alternate with the innermost whorl of stamens. In Achras, however, (contrary to Eichler's conjecture) the carpels alternate with the stamens and staminodes together ; and in Chrysophyllum Caimito (/"), some of the intervals between the stamens are occupied by two carpels, or rather some of the carpels develope in the intervals between the still visible abortive staminal tubercles and the fertile ones. A similar explanation probably fits the pleiomerous pistil of Lucuma grandifiora, Labramia, &c. Omphalocarpum needs working out. The oligomerous pistil of certain species of Lucuma, &c., is most probably due to true abortion. The special development of the pistil deserves further notice. The carpels, at first hemispherical, soon become crescentic. The cusps, which run inwards, soon unite with their neighbours, but do not reach the centre of the receptacle. The united carpels then grow vertically upwards to form a tube, entire externally, and divided inside by the incomplete radial septa formed by the carpel- lary commissures into as many elongated chamberlets opening into * In the other species it was easy to observe the successive appearance of these -whorls; but in Mimusops I had to infer it from the inner set being the smaller in the very youngest buds, though soou equalling or outgrowing the others. + I had conjectured this from an inspection of Wight's figure of Payena lucida {Isonandra polyandra, Wt., Tcones t. 1589) ; and a dissection of every species in the Kew Herbarium has confirmed tbis amply. + Eichler conjectures that the pleiomery is here due to '^ dedoublement." 68 FLORAL STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF SAPOTACE.E. a central tube. These cliamberlets enlarge at the base to form the lateral and outer walls of the ovarian cavity ; but above their cavity is usually more or less effaced. The adult style is, then, traversed by a tube which enlarges into a vault above the free apex of the receptacle, and into this vault the cells of the ovary open at the top. The stigma is usually lobed with as many festoons as there are carpels. In Achras this is masked at anthesis by the copious secretion of viscid fluid. The ovules arise singly from the receptacle in front of and free from each carpel at the time when its edges coalesce with its neighbours. Only a single coat is formed, and the nucleus appears to be a lateral outgrowth from the very short funicle or placenta. The micropjie always points downwards and outwards ; and the degree of anatropy is determined by the approach which the inner or receptacular wall of the ovary makes to the vertical. The impression left on my mind was that these organs were the axillary buds of the carpels, — a view that I should not have ventured to j)romulgate had it not been put forward for several other Orders by continental botanists. Disk. — In most of the flowers of this order the base of the ovary is more or less thickened and glandular (and hairy.) It secretes nectar in all the species examined fresh, except Bassia and Dasyaulus, where, as is well known, the coroUa-tube is thick, fleshy, and gorged with saccharine juice. In several of the Australian species of Sideroxylon (formerly Achras), the thickening of the ovary forms a well-marked ring above the base, and this is regularly festooned in S. ohdvatum ; hence the autonomy of Hormogijne, founded only on the presence of a disk, supposed to be absent in the rest of the Order, must fall to the ground. One or two other points are these : — The pedicels often undergo movements of nutation. They are erect in the bud, pendulous at anthesis, erect again in fruiting. The flower is almost always, if not invariably, proterogynous ; the style is protruded (and the stigma viscid) in the fresh species, before .the corolla has opened anywhere but at the apex. The same relation was noticed by Grifflth and Falconer in Reptonia/' a genus to which to which I shall revert directly. It will now be seen that, in all the cases cited, the evolution of the flower is strictly centripetal,! with a tendency to augmentation in the number of parts of the whorl as we advance from the periphery inwards. This would seem to fall under Hofmeister's two great generalizations : — "Each new member arises in front of the widest intervals between the next oldest members." " If the intervals be wide, the new members are formed in front of the intervals between the members of the next oldest whorl * In Trans. Linn. Soc, xix., 99, 101. + Variations in the number of parts, reported by other observers, {e.g., ten petals instead of eight, thirteen instead of twelve, Szc), would seem to be due to collateral deduplication. I have been very unfortunate in my search for these abnormalities. FLORAL, STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF SAPOTACEiE. 69 and those of the next but one." * In this last case, the two latter whorls may be viewed as forming a false whorl, and the new one may be termed an augmented whorl. The androecium of certain species of Bassia, of Pijcnanclra, Crijptogjjne, and Omphalo- carpum, still appear to me abnormal, or at least to need further explanation. As regards the classification of the Order, we find three well- marked divisions, as follows — the names being on the whole those of Bentham and Hooker's ' Genera' : — I. IsoNANDRE^. — Petals exstipulate ; stamens all fertile (in- cluding Isonandra, DicJwpsis, Pi/cnandra, Bassia, Dasyauhts, Paijena, and Lahourdojmaisia as limited by Bojer. II. Chrysophylle^. — Petals exstipulate ; alternipetalous stamens sterile or abortive (including Chrijsophijllum, EccUnusa, Lucuma, Sarcosperma, Sideroxijlon, Argania, Labatia, Achras, Butyrospermum, Leptostylis, Cryptogyne (?), He- noonia (?) III. MiMusoPE^. — Petals with lateral appendages ; alternipetalous stamens fertile in EicMeria f only (including Mimusops, Imbricaria, Eichleria, Labramia, Bunielia, and Dipholis). The structures and arrangements above described are exhi- bited in the following diagrams : — Bassia longifolia. S S MiMUSops Elengi. : s : s p p p P P : p : P : P : . St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St ccccccc c : s : s : s : s *p# *p* *p* *p* *p* *p* *p* *p* sto sto sto sto sto sto sto sto St st St st st St St St cccccccc Dasyaulus neriifolius. s s : s : s p p p 1> p p st St st St St st St st st st st st c c c c c c Achras Sapota. s s s : s : s : s p p p p p p sto sto sto sto sto sto : st : st : st : st : st : st cccc cccccccc * Handb. I. (AUg. Morph.-), 482, 489. + See Appendix. 70 floral structure and affinities of sapotace.e. Chrysophyllum oliviforme. Payena sjj. (Petals and androecium only). ^«;sss PPPP s s S b b p p p p St St St st P P P P P + + + + + : : : : St 8t St St St St : St : St : st : c c c 0 c st 8t St st st St at st LUCUMA CURVIFOLIA. s s s s P p : p p : p p sto sto sto sto sto sto st st st st st st c c c c c c We may now consider the affinities of this Order to sorte others. I have traced the floral development in Sipnjjlocos spicata and S. coronata and in the male flowers of Diospyros sylvatica and D. Emhryopteris. The sejDarate inflorescences are racemose or dibotryal in Symplocos ; axillary to each bract is a flower with two sterile bractlets, a quincuncial calyx, five alternate simultaneous petals, five alternipetalous staminal tubercles which become com- pound, and three carpels whose septa imite centrally. In Diospyros the inflorescence is cymose, or a raceme with a terminal flower (Z>. Emhryopteris.) Each flower bears two bractlets, two outer and two inner decussatmg sepals, and four alternisepalous simultaneous petals. The androecium begins with fom* alternipetalous stamens, and then others are formed in centrifugal succession, much as in Thea* Neither of these Orders, then, approaches Sapotacea as closely as StyracecB proper, judging from Payer's study of these. t "We have additional reasons, also, for making Symplocea distinct, as proposed by Miers and others. But the Order which midoubtedly comes closest to SapotacecB is MyrsinecB. Reptoyiia has the flowers no less than the habit of Sideroxijlon, and only five ovules; but these are not separated by the (incomplete) septa of Sapotacea;, the seed is cmwed, and the albumen slightly ruminate. I was agreeably sm-prised on tracing the floral evolution of Ardisia solanacea and A. paniculata to find that, though no sign of alternipetalous stamens appears, the antipetalous tubercles (of the fertile stamens) are not formed till the petals have become crescentic, and touch by their edges. Now Pfeffer and others have regarded the petal of PrimulacecB as an appendage to the stamen because of its development fi'om the back of the nascent staminal tubercle. That the opposition of Eichler * Figured not over successfully by Payer ' Organogenie,' t. 154. + Op. cit., 536, t. 152. FLORAL STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF SAPOTACE^. 71 and others to this view was just will, I think, now be admitted by all, for MijrsinecB and Primulacea, are only separable by the arborescent habit of the former ; and surely no one will maintain that the petal of Ardisia has a different moi'i)hological value from that of, say, AnagalUs. In animal development, cases are frequent where homological successions are masked by adaptive modifications. In many plants the petals, though first formed, are soon overtaken and outstripped by the stamens, a relation which is perhaps due to the longer time requu-ed for the formation of pollen than for petaline tissue. Carry the delay a stage fiu'ther back, and you have the history of Primidacece. The accompanying diagram would express my ideas as regards the relations of Sapotacem to the allied orders : — Guttifercc Olacinece TernstroemiacecB 1 G 1 Ebenacea 1 Styracece- 1 Sapotacece \ My 1 1 rsinecE ^Egiceracece Primulacece Plumbaginece APPENDIX. On Labourdonnaisia and Eichleria. The genus Labourdonnaisia was founded by Bojer for certain plants of Mauritius with a biseriate corolla, each whorl being equal to the false whorl of the biseriate calyx. The calyx varies from six to eight pieces, the corolla from twelve to sixteen, or perhaps by deduplication to eighteen. Hence it was thought that the coroUine symmetry was like that of Mimusops, and Sonder placed a plant with stipulate petals in Labourdonnaisia. To this was referred another plant of precisely similar floral symmetry by Mr. Bentham, in the ' Genera Plantarum,' with the just remark that they were allied to Mimusops. It will now be seen that the two last species are distinct fi-om the Mascarene species, and fall into another genus which I have here named in honour of him who was the first to indicate the true structure of its section, Mimusopece. These are the definitions (not full descriptions) of the two genera : — Labourdonnaisia, Boj. (char, emendat.) Sepala 6 v. 8, 2-plice serie imbricata. Petala 12 v. 16 (1, 2, interdum normali seriei additis), 2-plice serie imbricata. Stamina totidem, sub-1-seriata, omnia fertilia. Carpella alicrnisepala. Species omncs Mascarenses. 72 ON A QUESTION OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. EiCHLERLV, nov. f/en. — Calyx Mimusopis v. Imhricaria:. Petala totidem, appeiidicibus petaloideis geminatis integris Mimusopis. Stamina eodem uumero petalis alternantia et totidem eis aiiteposita, omnia fertilia. Carpella sectionis [Mimmopmrum) sepalis antepositis. — Genus a Mimusope staminibus alternipetalis fertilia tantum differt. Species 2 : — 1. E. discolor, milii [Lahourdonnaisia, Sond. in Linnaea, xxiii, 73). Natal. 2. E. albescens, milii {Lahourdonnaisia, Benth. ; Bassia, Griseb. in Cat. PI. Cub., 164). Cuba. ON A QUESTION OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. By W. p. Hiern, M.A. The law which should regulate the choice or creation of the botanical names of plants has been the subject of an interesting discussion in the June, August, September, and December numbers of the 'Journal of Botany' for last year, and the contributors to it have been the Editor, Professors A. DeCandolle and Caruel, and Mr. Ball. I had hoped that some of our greatest systematic botanists in this country, besides those included above, would have taken part in the controversy so far as to leave no doubt in the public mind, or in the minds of foreign botanists, about their views. They at least do not agree with the last-named botanist in regarding the priority of the specific portion of a plant's name as all-important, and in Tequiring it, unless already adopted for another species of the genus, to be respected without regard to any other names in the genus to which the plant is found to belong, that may have previously existed for the plant in question. It is doubtless true that the majority of our leatling botanists have long shown in their systematic publications, and still prove by their practice, that such is not their rule ; still a plain statement supported by argument, and made by such a veteran as Mr. Bentliam, would have been useful : it would have turned the scale of testimony, and gone a long way towards the settlement of the question. It is admitted on both sides that the multiplication of syno- nymy, which at present has. acquired enormous dimensions, and which is daily increasing, is a real evil and serious inconvenience ; and therefore it is a fair presumption to lay down that laws of nomenclature ought not to require unnecessarily a fm-ther increase of synonymy. It then follows that an ah-eady existing name is (unless regard be had to other considerations) preferable to one to be created ; and this deduction applies as well to generic words as to si^ecific combinations. Li the case of siDecific combmations, it is of course essential to final precision, on the Linn^ean plan of binominous nomenclature, that the left-hand component, being a generic word, should be the recognised name of the genus to which the species belongs ; and this limitation is universally ON A QUESTION OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATUEE. 78 allowed. But, without good and sufficient cause, to limit by law the word which may form the right-hand component of the s^Decific combination must in many cases involve the obligation to compound new names, and therefore would on the whole imply an enlarge- ment of synonymy. Why, then, is it desirable to pass or permit a law which directs that the right-hand component must be the oldest of such words which have ever been published under any genus whatever with reference to the species under consideration ? There is no reason, derivable from the general nature of the case, to suppose that a name is intrinsically better because it is older, — that a name which may have been published in an early stage of scientific investigation should be more suitable than one given after the acquisition of more extended knowledge, — or that a name hurried into publication should excel one subsequently, regularly, and dehberately selected by a competent monographer. I venture to say that the right and chief use of the law of priority resides in the effect that it furnishes a general, impartial, and unalterable rule whereby a name in a good and proper genus is fixed beyond the reach of futm-e disturbance ; but the law must not be permitted to be. aggressive, or to carry its general influence beyond the bounds of its general usefulness. When it has been employed to determine the generic word, and to select one of the various specific combinations of which the generic word forms the left-hand member, and which may have already existed for the species, it has done its proper duty, and it ought not further to compel the formation of a new specific combination by any regard to the antiquity of the right-hand member alone. For example, why should it be a legal obligation to construct a new name for the South American tree, Diospyros Paralea, Steud. (1840), a species the earliest name of which was Paralea guianensis Aubl. (1775), only because guianensis is the oldest specific portion, and Diosjjyros the necessary generic word ? Or, if some recent author had constructed and published the name which I shotild regard as an unnecessary and superfluous combination, should all succeeding generations be required to use it, in preference to a name which is appropriate, which has been adopted in DeCandolle's 'Prodromus,' in the * Flora Brasiliensis,' and in other books, and which is strictly in accordance with all necessary laws of nomenclatiu'e ? Again, while in some instances the specific portions of botanical names are given so as to express some absolute character of the species, such as cmnua, glabra, indica, on the other hand others, such as aberrans, affinis, dubia, intermedia, maxima, minor, have been given with reference to, or in comparison with, its supposed congeners, or as specially adapted to the particular genus in which the plant was placed ; such latter words are clearly liable to become inappropriate when appended to a different genus, and even the former may be rendered unsuitable when attached to a genus which includes m its generic character the attribute expressed therein. It is further obvious that, if the principle here opposed were permitted to prevail with all its logical consequences, the synonymy 74 TWO NEW GENERA OF A:\IARYLLIDACE.E FROM CAPE COLONY. of a genus would be perpetually liable to disturbance, whenever it became necessary to import additional species from other genera, the specific portions of the names of which might then take pre- cedence by theii- greater antiquity over those already estabhshed in the genus. The considerations stated above expose some difficulties and objections not of isolated occuiTcnce but of a general nature, so that they are capable of establishing fan- and reasonable arguments against making this disputed law of nomenclature, and are not merely incidental cases of hardship exceptionally detected in the course of operation of a necessary and w^ell- established law ; they, therefore, can and ought to be permitted to have their full weight in this matter. Professor Caruel aptly appeals to the practice of Linn^us and of succeeding botanists, and contends that when the first word of a botanical name is taken away the w^hole name falls to the ground. As Linnsus himself expressed it, "Nomen specificum sine generico est quasi campana sine pistillo ;" and when a new generic name is prefixed to the same affix, agreement is, a prion, doubtful. We in this country can point with pride to the great and brilliant additions recently made to systematic botany by our own botanists, and can show that they almost all, without exception, have seen no necessity for the law now sought to be imposed on us ; for while they are ever ready to maintain the specific member of a name when possible and convenient, yet they practically assert then- liberty to alter it whenever, on removing it to another genus, it seems to them right or preferable to do so. This liberty, so distinctly handed down to us, is more necessary than a law to repeal it; it is no undue license, it is often extremely useful, and we must not be deprived of it. ON TWO NEW GENEEA OF AMARYLLIDACEuE FROM CAPE COLONY. By'J. G. Baker, F.L.S. Apodolirion, B((kcr. Flowers solitary, sessile in a membranous spathe from the top of the bulb. Perianth erect, symmetrical, with a long cylinchical tube, and an erect funnel-shaped limb with six equal ascending lanceolate or oblong segments, finely nerved all over the back, not specially keeled. Stamens distinctly biseriate, three inserted at the throat of the tube, and three a shoi*t space above the base of the segments ; filaments short, filiform ; anthers linear, basifixed, erect, sagittate at the base. Ovary clavate, three- celled; ovules several in a cell, horizontal, superposed. Style filiform, a httle longer than the perianth-tube ; stigma simple, capitate. Fruit unknown. Root -stock a tunic ated bulb ; leaves synanthous or hysteranthous ; flowers delicate in textm-e, mode- rately large, whitish or pale red. TWO NEW GENERA OF AMAEYLLIDACE^ FROM CAPE COLONY. 75 Allied to GethyUis, from wliicli it mainly differs in the stamens. Of European genera, similar in habit to Crocus and Colchicum. Key to the Species. Leaves hysteranthous ; segments of perianth- limb oblanceolate, acute. Perianth-tube 3-4 inches long . . . 1. A. Mackenii. Perianth-tube 1^ inch long , . . . 2. A. Buchanani. Leaves synanthous ; segments of perianth-limb oblong, cuspidate ^. A. Bolusii. 1. A. Mackenh, Baker. Bulb and leaves not seen. Perianth- tube filiform, three to fom- inches long ; limb pale red, an inch and a half to two inches long ; segments oblanceolate-unguiculate, acute, a quarter of an inch broad two-thirds of the way up. Anthers a quarter of an inch long ; three upper inserted about a quarter of an inch above the base of the segments, on filaments shorter than themselves ; three lower from the throat, rising up to or a little above the insertion of the filaments of the three upper ones. Style reaching up to the tojD of the three lower stamens. Noodsberg, Natal, April, 1869, McKen! 2. A. Buchanani, Baker; Cyplionema Buchanani, Baker, in Trimen Journ., 1876, p. 66. Eoot-stock a globose bulb an inch in diameter, with membranous pale tunics produced one to two inches above its top, in which the spathe is hidden. Leaves hysteranthous. Spathe an inch long. Perianth-tube filiform, an inch and a quarter to an inch and a half long ; limb whitish, faintly tinged with red, an inch and a half long ; segments oblanceolate, acute, a quarter of an inch broad three-quarters of the way up. Anthers a quarter of an inch long ; three higher inserted a quarter to one third of an inch above the base of the segments on filaments an eighth of an inch long ; three lower reaching up from the throat to the point where the filaments of the three upper are inserted. Style reaching up to the top of the three lower anthers. Natal, Piev. J. Buchanayi ! 3. A. BoLUsn, Baker. Bulb not seen, its outer tunics produced an inch and a half to two inches above its neck. Leaves three, cotemporary with the flower and overtopping it, like those of Cyrtanthus helictus in shape and character, linear, glabrous, spirally twisted, one sixth of an inch broad. Perianth-tube two inches long, cylmdrical, stouter than in that of the two other species ; limb whitish, an inch and a half long ; segments oblanceolate-oblong, ascending, half an inch broad above the middle, obtuse, with a cusp. Anthers above a quarter of an inch long, the upper row inserted half an inch above the base of the segments on filaments shorter than themselves : anthers of the lower row reaching up to the base of those of the upper row. Style not distinctly seen in our only specimen. Li damp places on the highest mountains hear Graaf-Eeinet, at an elevation of 4300 feet, December, 1868, Bolus, 111 ! 76 TWO NEW GENERA OF AJMARYLLIDACEiE FROM CAPE COLONY. Anoiganthus, Baker. Flowers iii an umbel, or reduced to one, bracteated by a spatlie of one or two large lanceolate valves. Perianth erect, symmetrical, with a short funnel-shaped tube above the ovary, and an erect funnel-shaped limb with six equal ascending, lanceolate, acute segments, about three times as long as the tube, laxly nerved all over the back. Stamens six, distinctly biseriate ; filaments filiform, straight, ascending, longer than the anthers, those of the three upper inserted at the throat of the tube, those of the three lower a little below. Anthers small, oblong, versatile. Ovary oblong, three-celled ; ovules horizontal, very numerous. Style filiform, reaching finally nearly to the top of the perianth-segments. Stigma trifid, with short falcate spreading branches. Fruit a capsule, with loculicidal dehiscence. Seeds compressed, tightly packed in the cells. Acaulescent herbs, with a bulbous root- stock and moderately large, whitish, or pale- yellow flowers. From Cyrtanthus, with which this has been associated, this recedes widely in the character of the perianth, which resembles that of Hmmanthns or Buphane. In habit and stature, the common species recalls our European Leucojiun cBstivum. Tall, umbellate, with lorate leaves . . . 1. A. brevijiorus. Dwarf, 1-flowered, with filiform leaves . . 2. A. luteus. 1. A. BREviFLORUS, Baker ; Cyrtanthus breviforus, Harvey Thea. t. 139 (a poor figure). Bulb ovoid, an inch in diameter, with a short neck, and very dense tuft of slender root-fibres. Produced leaves generally three, cotemporary with the flowers, lorate, obtuse, half to three-quarters of an inch broad, above a foot long when fidly developed. Scape slender, terete, varying in length according to situation fi-om a couple of inches to a foot or a foot and a half. Umbel two to ten-flowered. Bracts one or two, lanceolate, one and a half to two inches long. Pedicels finally one to two inches long, erect in all stages. Ovary green, oblong, an eighth of an inch long ; tube a quarter to three-eighths of an mch long, funnel-shaped ; limb half to three-quarters of an inch long, whitish ; segments equal, lanceolate, acute. Three upper stamens reachmg half-way up the limb, the three lower just out of the throat. Anthers pale yellow, oblong, half an inch long ; filaments a quarter to one-third of an inch. Style overtopping the stamens, with three falcate stigmatose lobes, thickened at the tip. Perianth persistent till the fruit is half formed. Capsule membranous, oblong, or turbinate, half to three-quarters of an inch long, each cell filled full of compressed seeds. Natal, Krauss, 255 ! 394 ! Sanderson, 692 ! Plant, 106 ! At 5000 feet, on Mount Kondewelde, of the Sneeuwbergen range, December, 1872, in leaf and flower. Bolus, 2577! Damp places on the Baziya hills, Transkeian Kaffraria, (type and a depauperated one to two- flow^ered form, one to two mches high, without leaves present with the flowers). Rev. it. Baur, 248 ! In marshy plains, Beaufort, Cooper, 255 ! Damp table-land of Mount Boschberg, MacOwan, 2133! Aho Vreye, 3521! NEW COMPOSITiE FROM MONTE VIDEO. 77 2. A. LUTEUS, Baker; Cyrtanthus luteiis, Baker, in Trimen's Journ., 1876, p. 66. Bulb ovoid, half an inch in diameter, with brown tunics produced beyond its neck. Leaves filiform, not fully developed at the flowering-time. Scaj)e slender, one to two inches long, mth never more than a single flower. Spatlie of two linear valves about an inch long. Pedicel much shorter than the spathe. Flower bright pale yellow, permanently erect, an mch to an inch and a quarter long. Ovary oblong, an eighth of an inch ; tube narrowly funnel-shaped, a quarter to one-third of an inch ; segments lanceolate, acute, half to three-quarters of an inch. Stamens and style as in the last. Natal, Bev. J. Buchanan! NEW COMPOSITE FKOM MONTE VIDEO. By J. G. Baker, F.L.S. The following new species are contained in a parcel which I have recently received from Signor Arechavelata, Professolf of Botany in the University of Monte Video. Many other species belongmg to tribes not yet monographed in the ' Flora Brasiliensis ' are probably new ; but whilst it is yet undecided whether the work shall be proceeded with I leave these for the present. Vernonia pterocaulon, Baker, n. sp. An erect, suffruticose, unbranched perennial, about three feet in height ; the stem, under side of the leaves, and especially the involucre and rachis of the inflorescence, densely coated with persistent white cottony tomen- tum. Stem bearing heads of flowers in its upper two-thu-ds, winged throughout the leafy portion and lower 'pavt of the inflorescence. Leaves sessile, erecto -patent, alternate, oblanceolate- oblong, entire, cuneate at the base, subcoriaceous, bright green and glabrous on the upper surface, those of the lower third of the stem reaching a length of three to four inches, above this passmg gradually into the bracts which subtend the lowest heads of flowers, which are about an inch long. Liflorescence occupying two-thirds of the length of the stem ; the lower heads solitary and distant, subtended by reduced leaves ; the rest, except the upper- most, w^hich are solitary, placed two or three together on a very cottony, stout, flexuose rachis ; all sessile. Livolucre campanu- late, one-sixth of an inch long and broad ; the lanceolate, multi- serial, closely imbricated scales densely matted with white cottony tomentum. Flowers about twenty in a head. Achene not seen fully developed ; pappus one-sixth of an inch long, composed of numerous whitish ciliated bristles. Corolla red, with short lobes, and a' tube funnel-shaped in the upper and cylindrical in the lower half. Corro Largo, in dry stony soil, Arechavaleta, 4103 ! Totally different, by its long unbranched rachis of inflorescence, leafy at the very base only, from any species already known. In leafage and general habit it recalls to mmd Fterocaulun spica- tiun, DC. 78 NEW COMPOSITiB FROM MONTE VIDEO. EupATORiUM (Campuloclinium) Arechavaletje, Baker, n. sp. A robust erect perennial, three feet high. Stem imbranched below the mflorescence, stout, sulcate, slightly pubescent. Leaves few, alternate, sessile, four to eight inches long, half to an inch broad at the middle, entire or obscurely serrulate, moderately firm in texture, sHghtly pubescent and scabrous on both surfaces. Heads six to twenty in a terminal corymb ; the upper foot of the stem nearly naked ; the bracts linear and minute ; the branches rough with short bristly hairs ; some of the heads sessile in the centre x/ of the forks, the side ones on curved ascending peduncles three- fourths to an inch long. Heads containing fifty flowers or more ; the campanulate involucre half an inch in diameter and one-third of an mch long ; the large, pauciserial, obtuse, oblong-lanceolate, closely adjDressed scales, with a green many-nerved keel and a broad membranous border (white with a red tinge) all round it. Receptacle glabrous, alveolate. Achene seen immature only; pappus one-fourth of an inch long, of very numerous white bristles. Corolla bright purple, its tube as long as the pappus, and the linear segments one-third- as long as the tube. Style- arms protruded, subulate. Monte Video, in damp soil, Arechavaleta, 4172 ! 4173 ! There are only two species of Camjndoclinium with alternate leaves already known, from both of which this recedes widely. STENAcmENiuM RiEDELH, Baker, n, sp. An erect perennial herb, three to four feet high, with stem, leaves and involucre densely clothed with soft, spreading, white, silky hairs. Leaves mainly in a radical rosette, sessile, oblanceolate-oblong, six to ten inches long, crenato-repand principally in the upper half, narrowed gradually from the middle to the base, moderately firm in texture, strongly nerved on the under side. Stem winged through the lower half, its leaves few and very much reduced in size as com- pared with those of the radical rosette. Heads six to eight, at the end of long, densely silky, ascending peduncles, containing niany i hundred flowers each. Involucre campanulate, more than an inch ^ in diameter, three-fourths of an inch long ; the multiserial, closely imbricated, linear scales densely plumose. Many outer rows of flowers imperfect, composed of a glabrous achene one-eighth of an inch long, a pappus half an inch long, of very numerous brownish flexuose setae, and a filiform corolla as long as the pappus, mi- nutely lobed at the very top. Many inner rows of flowers perfect, with a similar achene and pappus, but a much stouter cylindrical corolla, more deeply lobed, and purple at the top, containing both a style and anthers. Monte Video, m damp soil, Arechavaleta, 4029 ! This is the unnamed species of Stenachenium mentioned by Mr. Bentham in * Genera Plantarum ' as havmg been gathered by Riedel. With its large radical rosette of leaves and densely silky stems, and very numerous flowers, packed in dense silky heads as large as, say, those of Cardnus nutans, it is a very striking jjlant. THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTRUM. 79 SxENACHiENiuM CAMPESTEE, Bcikev, u. tiji. A perennial herb, with a slender, creeping, woody rootstock, and erect 1-2-headed stems about a foot high. Leaves mostly crowded near the base of the stem, sessile, oblanceolate, enthe, obscurely pubescent, two to three inches long. Stem winged in the lower half or two-thhds, the leaves above the base small and few, the upper part especially clothed with fine, short, spreading, whitish pubescence. Flowers in a head, very numerous. Involucre nearly an inch in diameter, half to five-eighths of an inch long ; the pale greenish -drab, closely adpressed scales m many rows, the outer ones pubescent, the long inner ones nearly glabrous. Achene, pappus, and corolla as in the other species, both m character and size. Monte Video, in open plains, Arechavaleta, 4032 ! AN ENUMEEATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTRUM. By J. G. Baker. In the present paper I propose to attempt to classify the species of Hi]jpeastru77i as now known, understanding the genus in an enlarged sense ; that is to say, so as to include, in addition to Hi})- peastrum as chcumscribed in Kunth, Habranthus, Phycella and Pihodophiala as defined in the same work, and Rhodolirioii as recently defined by Philippi (' Linnasa,' vol. xxix., p. 65). Between these there is no material difference in structure, and any groups that can be devised are, in my view, of merely sectional value. The genus is one of great horticultural interest, and our information about it has been materially increased during the last generation. A great many new species have been discovered, especially in Chili ; and these have been described by Philippi in the * Linn^a ' and other places. It will be seen that I have reduced in number very materially the species known to Herbert and Kunth. The series begins with dwarf, slender plants that touch so closely upon Zephyrantlies that it is a point open to discussion where the exact line of demarcation should be di'awn ; and as a rule, the stature of the plant gets more robust, the leaves broader, and the flowers larger as we proceed towards the end of the chain. Using the term in this enlarged sense, Hippeastrum is a genus entirely confined to tropical and warm temperate America, which differs from the monotypic Cape genus AwanjUis solely by the seeds, which in Amaryllis are few, large, and bulbiform like those of Crinum, Hymenocallis, and Clivia, whilst in Hippeastrum they are numerous and flattened, with a dark-coloured testa, as in Zephyrantlies, PyroUrion, and Pancratium ; so that the two genera, although they resemble one another precisely in flower, are placed far apart in the classifications of Herbert, Kunth, and Sahsbury. Genus Hippeastrum {Herbert App. to Bot. Reg., 1821, p. 31.) — ■ Perianth openly, or rarely narrowly funnel-shaped ; tube above the 80 THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTRUM. ovary generally short ; throat naked, or variously appendiculate or fimbriate ; segments permanently ascending and imbricated, oblong or oblanceolate, or obovate-oblong, sub-equal, or the lowest inner one narrower than the rest. Stamens inserted at the throat of the tube ; filaments filiform, more or less decidedly declinate, usually shorter than the perianth- segments ; anthers linear- oblong, versatile. Ovary oblong, three-celled ; ovules many in a cell, horizontal, superposed; style filiform, declinate along with the stamens ; stigma capitate, or shortly trifid. Fruit a loculicidal capsule, with numerous black discoid seeds. — Acaulescent herbs. Bulbs with many brown membranous tunics. Leaves few (generally two to four), of short duration, fleshy, linear, or lorate. Flowers one to six in an umbel, the spathe of which is tubular in the lower half in the first section, slit down to the base in all the others. Key to the Sections and Species. Section I. Zephyrites (Herb.) Flowers sohtaiy, suberect ; spathe entire and tubular in the lower half; perianth an open funnel, with a short tube ; stigma trifid ; leaves narrow hnear (one- eighth to a quarter of an inch broad). * Grandijiori (Perianth-limb two to three inches long.) 1. H. sylvaticiim. 2. H. versicolor. 3. H. tuhispathum. 4. H. andicolum. 5. H. concolor. ** Parvijiori (Perianth-limb one and a half to two inches long.) 6. H. gracilifolium. 7. H. cearense. 8. H. franciscanum. 9. H. texanum. 10. H. Andersoni. Section II. Habranthus [Herb.) Flowers generally two to six in an umbel, rarely reduced to one ; spathe slit do"^Ti to the base ; perianth (except in H. phycelloides) an open funnel, with a short tube ; stigma trifid ; leaves linear (one-sixth to a quarter of an inch broad). * Flowers never more than one or ttoo. 11. H. chileme. 12. H. roseuni. 13. H. lineatum. ** Umbel tioo to six-fioxoered. Perianth an open funnel. 14. H. advenum. 15. H. bijidnm. 16. H. Bagnoldi. 17. H. montanum. 18. H. Berteroanum. 19. H. Jamesoni. *** Umbel two to six-Jioivcred. Perianth a narrow funnel. 20. H. phycelloides. Section III. Phycella [Lindl.) Flowers several in an umbel; spathe slit down to the base; perianth a naiTow funnel, usually more or less distinctly toothed at the throat ; segments oblanceolate ; stigma exserted, capitate ; leaves linear (a quarter to half an mch broad). 21. H. bicolor, 22. H. Herbertianum. THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTKUM. 81 Section IV. Rhodophiala (Presl.) Flowers one or several in an umbel; spatlie slit down to the base; perianth an open funnel, with a short tube ; leaves linear (a quarter to one-third of an inch broad). * Floioer solitary. 23. H, imifiorum. 24. H. modestum. * Flowers tioo or more. 25. H. andinum. 26. H. pratense. Section V. Rhodolieion (Philippi.) Like the last, but perianth- tube longer, and flowers always solitary. 27. H. montanum. 28. H. PJiodolirion. Section VI. Macropodasteum (Baker.) Habit robust ; flowers one to five, large, an open funnel, with a long tube not closed in with a neck at the throat ; spathe sht do^vn to the base ; stigma cax^itate or trifid ; leaves one to two inches broad. Stigma capitate . • . 29. i?. solandrifiorum. Stigma trifid . . . 30. H. amhiguum. Section VII. Omphalissa [Salish.) Habit robust ; flowers two to four, large, oi^enly funnel-shaped, the throat closed in by a distinct produced neck ; spathe slit down to the base ; stigma trifid ; leaves one to two inches broad. 31. H. aidicum. 32. H. organense. 33. H. calyptratrum. 34. H. psittacinum. Section VIII. Aschamia (Salisb.) Habit robust ; flowers two to four, large, openly funnel-shaped, the throat not closed in by a neck ; stigma entire ; spathe slit down to the base ; leaves one to two inches broad. * Tube very short. 35. H. pardinnm. 36. H. Leopoldi. 37. H. miniatum. 38. H. BegincB. * Tube three-quarters to one inch long. 39. H. 2Jroce)'inn. 40. H. barhatum. 41. H. reticulatum. 42. H. equestre. 43. H. Roezli. 4:4:. H. stylosum. Section IX. Lais (Salisb.) Habit robust ; flowers two to four, large, openly funnel-shaped, the throat not closed in by a neck, stigma trifid ; spathe slit down to the base ; leaves one to two inches broad. 45. H. h-eviflorum. 46. H. vittatum. 47. H. riitilum. List of the Species, with Synonyms and Geogeaphical DiSTEIBUTION. 1. H. sglvaticwn. — Habranthiis sglcaticus, Herb.; Kunth Enum. v. p. 498. Bahia, Martim ; Ceara, in di-y open woods near Crato, Gardner, 1867 ! 82 THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTRUM. 2. H. versicolor. — Habranthus versicolor, Herb. ; Kuutli Eiium. v., p. 498. Bueuos Ayres, Ticeedie ! 3. H. tuhispath 11771. — Amaryllis tuhispatha, L'Herit. Seii. Angl. p. 9. Habranthus robiistus, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 498. Buenos Ayi*es, Tweedie! 4. H. andicolum. — Habranthus andicola, Herb. ; Kimth Enum. v., p. 500. Chili, Poppig ! 5. H. concolor. — Habranthus concolor, Lindl. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 500. Mexico, near Leon, Hartwqi, 219 ! 6. H. gracilifolium. — Habranthus fjracilifolius , Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 497. Uraguay, Isabelle ! 7. H. ceareme. — Habranthus cearensis, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 500. Ceara, in diy, open woods, with H. sylvaticum, G-ardner, 1858 ! Goyaz, BurcheU, 8123 ! 8. H. franciscanum. — Zephyr anthes franciscana, Herb. MSS. Bulb subglobose, an inch and a quarter in diameter, mth pale broA\'n, membranous tunics produced beyond its neck ; leaves narrow, linear, hysteranthous, one-twelfth of an inch broad ; scapes two from a bulb, one-flowered, slender, four to six inches long ; spathe an inch and a quarter long, membranous, cleft into two valves less than half way down ; pedicel shorter than the spathe ; ovary oblong, oblique, a quarter of an inch long ; tube a narrow greenish funnel one-thh'd to a quarter of an inch long'; limb pale red, sub-erect, three-quarters to an inch long ; segments oblanceolate-obloug, a quarter of an mch broad, much imbricated ; stamens unequal, not nearly as long as the segments ; anthers linear-oblong, one-sixth of an inch long. Alagoas, in open, sandy ground on the banks of- Kio San Francisco, Gardner, 1422 ! 9. H. te.ranum. — Zephyranthes texana. Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 487. Habranthus Andersoni var. texanus, Kunth Enum. v., ]). 499. Texas, Drummond, in., 410 ! Lindheimer, 314 ! New Mexico, C. Wright, 1904 ! 10. H. Andersoni. — Habranthus Andersoni, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 499 (excl. var. 6.) Uraguay, Tweedie! Captain King' Gibert, 179 ! 182 ! 184 ! 185 ! 506 ! 831 ! 11. H. chilense. — Amaryllis chilensis, K. & P. El. Peruv. iii., p. 56, erroneously referred by Kunth to H. miniatum. Habranthus chilensis, Herb.; Kunth Enum. v., p. 497. Chili, Herb. Reed! Peru, Pavon ! 12. H. roseum. — Habranthus roseus. Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 495. H. pumilus. Herb. ; Kimth Enum. v., p. 499. Zephyranthes purjmrea, Philippi, in ' Linnaea,' xxix., p. 65. Chili, Herb. Reed! 13. H. lineatum. — Habranthus lineatus, Philippi, Desc. Nuev. Plant. (1873), p. e>Q. Chih, Philippi. 14. H. advenum. Herb., App. 31. Amaryllis advena, Ker in Bot. Mag. t. 1125. Habranthus hesperius. Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 495, with the numerous synonj^ms cited. H. mendocinus, Philippi, in 'Linnaea,' xxxiii., p. 258. Chlidanthus Cumingii, Presl. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 654. Kustcphia macleanica. Baker, in Kef. Bot. t. 332. Common in Chili, with three well-marked varieties, Philippi! C. Gay ! Cuming, 355 ! 395 ! &c. ly THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTRUM. 83 15. if. hiftdum. — Uraguay and South Brazil, Tweedie ! Fox ! Gibert, 174 ! 505 ! So far as I can make out there is one eastern species of this group, to which belong Habranthus kermesinus, nobilis, nemoralis, intennedius, spathaceiis, bijidus, pulcher, and pedunculosiis, as defined in Kunth. A ^Dlant from the Andes of Ecuador, gathered by Dr. Jameson and Colonel Hall, is not distin- guishable by dried specimens. 16. H. Bagnoldi. — Habranthus Bagnoldi, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 496, with its three varieties. H. imnctatus, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 495. Chili, Cuminy, 865! Reijnolds ! Melocoton, Gillies ! North Patagonia, Captain Middleton ! 17. H. montanum. — Hahranthus montanus, Philippi, Desc. Nuev. Plant. (1873), p. 66. Chih, Philippi. 18. H. Berteroanum. — Habranthus Berteroanus, Philippi, in ' Linnaea,' xxix., p. 66. Chih, Bertero. 19. H. Jamesoni, Baker. — Leaves and bulb not seen ; scape slender, two to' fom'-flowered, about half a foot long ; spathe of two membranous pale Imear valves, one and a half to two and a half mches long ; pedicels half an inch to an inch and a quarter, the lower flowers di-ooping, the upper ascenduig ; ovary oblong, a quarter to one-thh'd of an inch long ; perianth an open funnel, two to' two and a half inches long, apparently pale red ; tube one-sixth of an inch long ; segments unequal, the foiu: upper ones oblong, one-half to five-eighths of an inch broad at the middle, the two lower ones lanceolate, one-quarter to one-third of an mch broad ; stamens miequal, about half as long as the segments ; anthers linear-oblong, one- sixth to a quarter of an inch long ; style a little longer than the stamens, trifid at the tip. Argentine territory ; side of ravines, near Jachal — flowering in February, Dr. Jameson I 20. H. phijcelloides. — Hahranthus phycelloides, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 492, Chili, Macrae! Herb. Reed! Connects Habranthus with Phycella, as it possesses the narrowly funnel-shaped perianth with oblanceolate segments of the latter and the trifid stigma of the former. 21. H. bicolor. — Amaryllis bicolor, Ruiz & Pav., Fl. Peruv. iii., p. 57. Under this I would unite Phycella ignea, cyrtanthoides, magnifica, gracilijiora, attenuata, brerituba, and bicolor, as they stand m Kimth, with apparently P. angiistifolia, Philippi, Desc. Nuev. l^ Plant, 1873, p. 67, as an alpine variety. The plant is common in Chili, and is so showy that it has been gathered by most collectors of numbered sets. I may cite Cuming 494, Lechler 3213, Bridges 32, and Matthews 321. The forms differ in the size of the flower, the breadth of the leaf, and distinctness of the teeth between the bases of the filaments. 22. H. Herbertianum. — Phycella Herbertiana, Lindl. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 513. Chili, Macrae. 23. H. uniflorum. — Rhodophiala unifiora, Philippi, Viag. Desert. Atacam., No. 365. Atacama, Philippi. This I have not seen, but suspect that it will prove a form of H. pratense. 24. H. modestum. — Rhodophiala modesta, Philippi, Desc. Nuev. Plant (1873), p. 66. Chih, Philippi ! A well-marked species. 84 THE SPECIES OF HIPPEASTRUM. 25. H. amlimim. — Rhoilophiala .^ andina, Philippi, Desc. Nuev. Plant (1873), p. 67. Chili, Herb. Reed! 26. H. prateme. — Hahranthm pratemh, Herb.; Kuuth Enum. v., p. 492. H. speciosus, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 492. Amaryllis chilemis, Hook & Arn., Bot. Beech, p. 47, non E. & P. Rhodophiala amanjlloides, Presl. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 853 ? R'. Volckmanni, Philippi, in ' Linnaea,' xxxiii., p. 259. R. l(Bta, Philippi, Viag. Atacam., No. 369. Chili, Beechy ! Macrae! Herb. Reed ! &G. 27. H. montanum. — Rhodolirion montanum, Philippi, in * Linnaea,' xxix.,p. 65. Chili, Herb. Reed! 28. H. Rhodolirion. — Rhodolirion andinum, Philippi, in ' Linnaea,' xxix., p. Q6. Chili, Bustillos. 29. H. solandriflorum, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 519. Venezuela, Fendler, 1505 ! British Guiana, Pollard, 114 I Schom- buryk, 700 ! Appun, 2328 ! North Brazil, Gardner, 3477 ! Burchell, 80831 8120-4! Here the tube of the perianth is four or five inches long. 30. H. ambiguum. Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 520. Buenos Ayres, Tweedie! Most likely will prove to be a garden hybrid between solandriflormn and vittatum. 31. H. auliciim, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 515 (excl. var. y., which is H. organense.) H. Heiiserianum, Karsten Fl. Columb. t. 102. BrazH. 32. H. organense, Herb. ; Kmith Enum. v.. p. 516. Amaryllis Gardne)-i, Seubert m Fl. Bras, iii., p. 149. South Brazil, Bowie and Cunningham ! Gardner, 686 ! 688 ! Glaziou, 8992 ! 33. H. calyptratum, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 516. Brazil, Gardner, 687 ! 34. H . psittacinum. Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 517. Brazil. 35. H. pardinum. — Amaryllis pardina, Hook, fil., in Bot. Mag. t. 5645. Andes of Peru, Pearce. 36. H. Leopoldi. — Amaryllis Leopolcli, Moore in Gard. Chron., 1870, p. 733, fig. 140. Andes of Peru, Pearce. 37. H. miniatum. Herb. ; Kmith Enum. v., p. 524, excluding the synonym Amaryllis chilensis of Kuiz & Paron. Peru, Pavon ! Matthews! 38. //. Reginoi, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 525. Widely spread in Tropical America. 39. H. procerum, Lemahe 111. Hist, xi., p. 408. Amaryllis procera, Duchartre ; ' Flore des Serres,' t. 2077-8. A. Rayneri, Hook fil., in Bot. Mag. t. 5883. South Brazil, Binot. 40. H. barbatum, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 522. Guiana. This I have only seen in the Linnaean herbarium. 41. H. reticulatum, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 521. Brazil. 42. H. equestre, Herb. ; Kunth. Enum. v., p. 523. H occidcntale, Eoem. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 518. Martinique, ii?a//?z .' Yucatan and Tabasco, G. P. Johnson ! Columbia, Muritz ! Holton ! Birschel ! French Guiana, Sugot, 827 ! Rothery ! British Guiana, Parker ! Ecuador, Jameson, lib ! Chili, Bridges ! NOTES ON RUBI. 85 43. H. Roezli. — Amaryllis Boezli, Eegel, ' Gartenflora,' 1874, p. 290, t. 809. Andes of Bolivia, Pioezl. 44. H. sUjlosum, Herb.; Kunth Enum. v., p. 523. Amari/Uis staminea, Seubert in Marl. Fl. Bras., iii,, ^. 150. French Guiana, Hon. Brooks. North Brazil, Burchell, 9819-2. Gardner, 1167 ! 45. H. breviflorum, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 520. Buenos Ayres, Tweedie ! 46. H. vittatian, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 520. Tropical America. 47. H. rutihim, Herb. App. p. 31. H. bidlndosuni, Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., p. 527, with the eleven varieties there noted. South Brazil, Gardner, 5210 ! Weir, 48 ! 314 ! Glaziou, 8991 ! &c. I cannot clearly distinguish from this H. Martianum, Eoem. ; Kunth Enum., v., p. 525 ; and H. ylaucescens,- Herb. ; Kunth Enum. v., j). 526. NOTES ON BUBI. (No I.) By Charles C. Babington, F.R.S., &c. 1. EuBus Leesii, Bah. — I have often expressed doubt con- cerning the right of this curious plant to sioecific rank, chiefly on account of its being invariably nearly, if not totally, barren. I have never known a dru^De, although apparently perfect, to germinate ; but Dr. Focke tells me that he has once done so, and obtained the true plant. Until recently, I should have said that all the specimens which I have seen were very constant in the character of their foliage ; but a plant sent to me by Mr. H. Bromwich (gathered "in a bog at Woodloes, near Warwick," in July and September, 1876), and issued also by the Botan. Exchange Club as ft. Leesii, is considerably different. It has the leaves of the barren stem (the "cane" of gardeners), simple and three-lobed, but nevertheless bearing a wonderful resemblance to those of the typical it. Leesii. On the specimen distributed by that " Club " the leaves all have this structure ; but those received direct from Mr. Bromwich have a few leaves of the usual character of those of B. Leesii, viz., ternate, with all the leaflets sub-sessile but quite distinct. Unfortunately, in the otherwise beautiful plate in the ' Suppl. to Eng. Bot.,' t. 2981, the terminal leaflet is represented as possessing a rather long stalk. The introduction of that stalk is a mistake of the ariist, who probably had the ternate form of B. Idaius in his mind. The true B. Leesii has never a stalk more than one-sixth of an inch in length. Unfortunately, this error escaped the notice of the author of the text which accompanies that plate (Mr. Lees), and also the editor of the new ' English Botany.' Continental authors who have noticed B. Leesii are agreed in considering it as a form of B. Idfzus, similar to the form of Flay aria vesca called F. monophylla. The plate in ' Fl. Dan.' (Suppl. t. 138) of the B. hlmis c. anomalns of Arrhenius, 86 NOTES ON RUBI. undoubtedly represents my R. Leesii. Mr. Bromwicli's plant is even more curious than the car. anumcdm ; for it has most of the leaves on the barren stem 3-lobed, although a few of them are ternate. Arrhenius thought that Host (' Fl. Aust,' ii. 28) had seen a similar plant ; but on reading Host's remarks, I cannot find any cause for thinking that he knew any plant really different from the ternate-leaved forms of Ii. Idmis. As Focke (' Journ. of Bot.,' X., 27) justly remarks, the lengthening of the leaves in a forward dil-ection is arrested in Pi. Leesii, but very marked in true E. Idmis. He supposes that this may be a form developing into a new species, but that can hardly be the case, as it usually, if not always, has barren di-upes. I think, therefore, that we cannot sustain Pi. Leesii as a species distinct from B. LI(bus, although the two plants can never be con- founded either in the field or the herbarium. Some very valuable and interesting remarks upon R. Idmis, by F. W. C. Areschong, will be found in the 'Journ. of Bot.,' xi., 108. 2. E. suBERECTus, Auders., and E. fissus, Lindl., seem to be well understood by the northern continental botanists, but they were hardly clear to such a master in this genus as the Eev. A. Bloxam. In his recently-issued " Set of British Riibi,'' he gives a very good example of R. Jissus from Moira Eeservoir, in Leicester- shh'e, as R. suherectiis. I had not previously seen any specimens named R. Jissus or ft. suherectus by him, and this specimen rather troubles me, as it renders doubtful the counties which I have quoted for these plants on his authority (Worcester, Hereford, and Leicester) m my " Eubi," (pages 53 and 57.) Those counties now requu-e confirmation. Mr. Bloxam issued two specimens, one as R. suherectus and the other as R. Jissus ; but I cannot see in what they difl'er. One of the specimens named R. Jissus by Lindley for Leighton is exactly the R. suherectus of this published " Set." Pi. microacanthos (Kalt. !), in ' Wirtg. Herb. Eub.,' ed. ii. 51, and Boulay's ! ' Eonces Vosg.,' 121, is a synonym of R. suherectus (Anders.) 3. E. iMBRicATUs, Hurt. I now possess a good series of R. ramosus (Blox.), from near Plymouth (T. E. Archer Briggs), and near Bu-mingham (J. Bagnall.) Also authentic specimens from Mr. Bloxam, from the neighbourhood of Eugby. It only seems to differ from R. imhricatus by the leaflets not being imbricate and sometimes having felt beneath. In no other respect can I detect any important difference. The names are not very good, but unfortunately the worse of them is by many years the elder. Mr. Briggs has given a detailed description of R. ramosus in the ' Journ. of Bot.' (ix., 330.) I do not think that it was described under that or any other name previously, unless it is the same as R. imhricatus. It is probable that the imbricate character of the leaflets of Mr. Hort's plant is not constant, although he considered it so marked a distinction as to use it to furnish a specific name. I could not find any plant with such leaves at Eedbrook, and I have not seen one with them, except those from Mr. Hort himself, unless they are so on a specimen gathered at Eedbrook by the Eev. A. Ley in 1871. NOTE ON THE GENUS PYGEUM. 87 Mr. Harbord Lewis sent a plant several years since from Allerton Koad, near LiveriDool, which I doubtfully named R. imhricatus ; I now believe that it is really one of the CoryUfolii. ( To he contmued.j NOTE ON THE GENUS PYGEUM, Gaertn. By H. F. Hance, Ph.D., &c. When describing, seven years ago, a supposed new species of Pygeum,'^^ I failed to perceive its identity, — of which there can be no doubt, — with Priinus macropliylla, S. & Z., although I pos- sessed a good flowering specimen of the Japanese plant. This and P. spinulosa, S. & Z., seem to me just as much allied to Pygeiim as to Priinns, particularly by their thin cartilaginous putamen, though they have not the "di'upa transversim latior, in medio utrinque leniter compressa "f of the typical species, which suggested to Gaerfcner his somewhat unpoetical name. They technically belong to the section Laurocerasus, which, although combined with Pcubis by DeCandolle, Koch, and many other writers, is, when properly limited, a truly natm'al group, as long ago well insisted on by Torrey and Gray.| I do not hesitate to express a decided con- \uction that Pygewn must be merged in this, which differs from all other sections of Prunus by its coriaceous evergreen foliage, frequently almost a quite juiceless fruit, § and thin putamen. || The remodelled group can either be retained in Primus, or, I think l^referably, and more naturally, — taking into consideration that " est propria quaedam Lauroceraso facies,"1T — be distinguished generically, under Tournefort's original name. A comparison of two such plants as Pygeinn acuminatwii, Colebr. and Primus acuminata, Wall., will, I think, show the justice of my opinion. Mr. Kurz has recently established, under the name of Pygeopsis, a section of Prunus, distinguished only by the character "Evergreen trees ; flowers racemose ;" and he remarks : — " The genus Pygeum is so closely allied to the section Pygeopsis of Prunus as to make it difficult to keep it distinct. Indeed, Pygeopsis and Prunus com- bined stand pretty much in the same relation to Prunus as Eriohotrya does to Pirus.'"^'-''' This section appears altogether * Seem. 'Journ. Bot.,' viii., 243; where see my remarks on its extreme afl&nity to Prunus. + Gaertner, ' De fruct. et sem. Plant.,' i., 218. + ' Fl. N. America,' i., 411. § In some species rather an achcenium in its character than a drupe. II Certainly in P. macropliylla, S. & Z. ; P. javanica, Miq. ; P. spinulosa, S. & Z. J and P. Junghiihniana, Miq. ^ Tournefort, ' Inst, rei herb.,' ed. 3, curante Jussiaeo, i., 628. ** ' Journ. As. Soc. Bengal,' xiv., 303. Eriobotrya=iPhotinia,Bth> & Hook.,f. 88 SHORT NOTES. identical with Miquel's previously founded Nothocerasiis ;* nor can I see that it is in any way distinguishable from Laurocerasus. SHOET NOTES. Flora of Lake Lancashire (Journ. Bot. 1870, pp. 268-296). — In Miss Hodgson's herbarium, now incorporated vdih. the general British collection in the British Museum, are some plants which are not included in her pubhshed list. Cochlearia danica (named by Mr. Baker), from Walney Island, was placed on the sheet with Arenaria serpyllifolia , and was thus overlooked. Parnassia palustris and Crepis virens were no doubt accidentally omitted. Miss Hodgson's specimens of the former are from Gillbanks, Ulverston; Plumpton Moss ; and top of Hawkshead Hill. The Melilotus vulgaris of the list seems to me rather M. parvijiora, Desf. ; and the Daucus waritimufi is not the true plant. The only specimen in Miss Hodgson's herbarium representing the Galium MoUugo of her list is (r. Aparine. We have a tj^pe- specimen fi'om Ulverston of Bosa hractescens, Woods, which is not in the hst. The Erytliro'a littoralis of the list, so far as the Humi^hrey Head plant is con- cerned, is E. pulchella : the i)lants from " Plumpton salt marshes" are of both species. The names Atriplex angustifolia and A. hastata have been transiDOsed ; and Pohjyonum Hgdropiper, as regards the specimens from "plantations," is represented by a i?it?//f^.r, appa- rently a young state of E. nemorosus, a species not included in the list. — James Britten. Scotch Locatities. — Bosa inrohita, Sm. (B. SmitJiii of Baker), Eiver Almond, near Eatho, Linlithgowshire, June 23rd, 1868, several j)lants. — MalaHs j^ctJudosa, Sw., on the west side of Ben Lomond, near Eowardennan, Stirlingshire, August 22nd, 1877. — On looking over some of my old gatherings, I find Carduus arvnisis, Curt., ft. setosus near Currie, Edinburghshire, September, 1865. — A. Craig Christie. * ' Fl. Ind. Batav.,' i. 1, 364.. The only distinctions on -which Miquel relies are the shape of the fruit, and the leaves, generally quite entire in Nothocerasus, and serrate in Laurocerasus. The first character is obviously ina•»»^)oREASTRUM,S7^ nor. Herbaceum, perenne, tripollicare, laxe pilosum, foliis carnosulis 4-7 lin. longis ■|-f lin. latis radicalibus confertis linearibus apice trisectis segmentis lineaiibus iterum trisectis setaceo-mucronatis caulinis linearibus margine hmc inde denticulatis apice simpliciter trisectis summis linearibus indivisis margine apiceque fusco-membranaceis, floribus terminalibus solitariis, involucri squamis subscariosis lineari- oblongis obtusis pallidis extus cum caulis apice dense albo-tomen- tosis margine lato membranaceo glaberrimo ferrugineo sublacero cinctis, ligulis oblongis albidis (?) involucrum duplo superantibus. In monte Siao ^^'u-tai-shan, Chinse bor., m. Julio 1876, coll. Hancock. (Herb, propr. n. 20132.) 1 have not been able, from the only two specimens in my SPICILEGIA FLORAE SINENSIS. 109 possession, wliicli bear each a single flower, to ascertain the structure of the florets and achenes of this pretty plant, but I suspect it may be most nearly allied to the very rare and local Pyrethrum Kiriloirii, Turcz., on which Schultz Bipontinus, following a suggestion of DeCandolle, founded his genus Tridactijlina. DeCandolle describes that plant as havmg "habitus C. Mijconis; folia multo majora quam ISaxifragce tridactj/litis, sed forma affinia ;" and F. v. Herder (' Plant. Eadd.,' bd. 3, hft. 2, 40) remarks on its resemblance to C. arcticum, Linn. The leaves of Turczaninow's species are moreover described as obovate-cuneate, its ligulae as yellow, and there is no mention of the very hairy involucre -scales, so it seems impossible to refer Mr. Hancock's plant to it. It is quite different from any Siberian species known to me. 27. Artemisia [Ahrotanum) vestita, Wall. Supra pagum Tai-wan, secus fl. Lien-chau, j)rov. Cantonensis, Oct. 1876, leg. Eev. J. C. Nevin. Previously gathered in Shan-tung by the late Dr. Maingay, and at Kiukiang by Dr. Shearer ; otherwise new to China. 28. Saussurea alpina, DC, var. leucophylla, Led. ? Li m. Siao Wu-tai-shan, Chinas bor., Jidio 1876, coll. Hancock. I think referable to this form, but I have seen no authentic specimens. V 29. Saussurea (bracteatce*) iodostegia, sp. nov. Caule simplici inferne glabro apicem versus laxe villosulo, foliis iuferioribus ? mediis linearibus acutis margine denticulis x^arvis j)atentibus notatis sparsim pilosulis basi vaginantibus ac breviter decurren- tibus 2|— 5 poll, longis 3 lin. latis superioribus ovato-lanceolatis summisque ellipticis cucuUatis submembranaceis bracteiformibus integris plus minus violaceo-tinctis venisque purpurascentibus reti- culatis, capitulis 4 pedunculis brevibus villosis suffultis ovato- oblongis 7 lin. longis, squamis laxe glanduloso-pilosis exterioribus ovatis interioribus ovato-lanceolatis obtusiusculis medio purpureo- pictis margine atro-i)urpureo cinctis. In m. Siao Wu-tai-shan, Chinae septenlrrionahs, m. Julio 1876, legit W. Hancock. (Herb, propr. n. 20148.) 3< I have only a single imperfect specimen, but the plant is evidently a near ally of the Himalayan *S'. ohvallata, Wall. 30. Lobelia radicans, Tlibg. Ad^ipas limosas fluviorum North et West Kivers, prov. Cantonensis, copiose. Quite identical with Japanese specimens. Though not before recorded from China, I have no doubt, judging from the characters assigned them, that several of A. DeCandolle's species are reducible to this. 31. Rhododendron (Azalea) sinense, Sweet. In insula Tung-dung- ding-san, lacus Tai-hu, prov. Che-kiang, exeunte Aprih 1874, coll. T. B. Forbes. Excellent specimens of a plant very rare in a wild state. 32. Pijrola (Thelaia) rotundifolia , Lindl. In m. Siao Wu-tai- shan, Chinae bor., Jul. 1876, coll. W. Hancock. Both the forms, alhijiora and incarnata, which are surely not deserving of the rank of varieties. C. B. Clarke, ' Compositiv.' indicio,' 220. 110 SPICILEGIA FLOR^ SINENSIS. 33. Moneses grmidijiora, Salisb. Cum praecedente. This is the lii'st time the -plsmi has been found in any part of the Chinese Empire. " Asi« boreahs " should be added to the geographical distribution in the ' Genera.' 34. Li(justrum Ibotu, S. & Z. Circa Chi-fu, a. 1878, coll. C. C. Stuhlmann. Precisely like Japanese specimens from M. Maxi- mo wicz. New to the Chinese flora. 35. Vinceto.cicum monyolicam, /3. Hancuckianiim, Maxim. ? In m. Siao Wu-tai-shan, coll. Hancock. My specimens, apparently referable to this, are only in fruit, and difier from Maximowicz's description by the stem being entirely smooth, except at the extreme apex ; the leaves quite smooth beneath, but with a few scattered short hau's above along the midiib, and with two or three small raised papillose reddish glands on the upper siu'face of the blade at its junction with the petiole ; the light-brown com- pressed seed I find nerveless, narrowly margined, 7 mill, long by 4 wide, with a shining white coma only 11 mill. long. 36. Vincetoxicum uinpleAcaule, S. & Z. Chi-fu, a. 1873, coll. C. C. Stuhlmann. M. Maximowicz remarks that V. acuminatum, Dene., though very like V. japoniciim, Morr. & Dene., is readily distinguishable by its pm-e wdiite corolla double as large, and by the form of its leaves. In a specimen of the former, gathered at Vlada Vostok by M. Sokoloff, a Kussian naval officer, and given me by Dr. Bretschneider, the flowers are sometimes very slightly, sometimes not at all larger than in an authentic specimen of V. japoniciim, y. piirpurascens, received from M. Maximowicz himself, and the leaves all wider above the middle than below, in fact, elliptic- oblong. As, too, the colour of the flowers varies a good deal in the latter plant, I do not think V. acuminatum has any claim to specific distinction. 37. Cynanchum deltoideum, Hance. Ad sinum Ta-lien-wan, Manchuriae, coll. Swinhoe. M. Maximowicz has recently (' Mel. Biolog. Bull. Acad. St. Petersb.,' ix., 803), aniving at the decision from my description only, mthout knowing the plant, referred this as a synonym to C. pubescent, Bge. I marvel at this, for, as he justly observes, Bunge's species has "folia nunquam alia quam cordata," whereas I had expressly stated those of mine to be "basi lata insigniter truncata." I possess, indeed, no authentic specimen of C. pubescens, but Dr. Wells Williams sent me, from Poking, what I cannot doubt for a moment to be Bunge's plant, and it diflers from mine, not only m the very dilierent shape of the leaves, but in inflorescence and the floral organs. 38. Khretia ovalifolia, Wight. In ora septentrionali ins. Hai- nan, prope oppidum Hoi-hau, d. 19 Nov. 1866, leg. Sampson. I have seen no authentic specimens, but this agrees well with Dr. Wight's diagnosis and figure ('Icones,' t. 1383). The veins form a prominent reticulation beneath, the primary ones have barbellate axils, and the petioles are ciliate on each side of the upper margin with white hairs arising]: from brown ulandular tubercles. SPICILEGTA FLOR^ SINENSIS. Ill 39. Ehretia bnxifoUa, Roxb, In collibus demissis, solo arenoso, circa pagum piscatorium Pak-slia, extremitate meridionali prov. Kwang-timg, ipse legi, d. 20 Nov., 1866. 40. Lindenherffia urticifolia, Lelira. Secus fl. Lien-chan, prov. Cantonensis, ultra Tai-wan, 65 ra. p. ab ejus ostio, m. Octobri 1876, coll. Rev. J. C. Nevin. Not found before in China. 41. Lindenbergia manrostachi/a, Bentli. In moenibus urbis Can- tonis, ipse primum legi, m. Octobri, 1860; in spelunca porphyritica ad Sai-chii-shan inter pulverem et frustula rupium dilapsarum invenit Sampson, Apr. 1866. Recorded only from various parts of India, Burma, and the Philippines. 42. Veronica [Pseudolysimachia) sibirica, Linn. In m. Siao Wu- tai-shan, Chinae septentrionariae, Jul. 1876, coll. Hancock. Not hitherto found in China Proper. 43. Premna japonica, Miq. In montibus juxta Ningpo, aestate 1872, coll. R. Swinhoe. Only found previously in Japan, speci- mens from which country are in every respect identical. 44. Ajiuia (Biif/iila) lupulina, Maxim. In monte Siao Wu-tai- shan legit Hancock. My specimen of this fine and remarkable plant differs from Maximowicz's diagnosis in having the lower leaves only petiolate, the others sessile, and all oblong and quite obtuse ; very different in texture and shape from the floral ones. 45. Salicornia (Arthrocnemum) mdica, Willd, In sabulosis mari- timis ad Hoi-tau, ora occidua ins. Hai-nan, maris chinensis, m. Januario 1866, coll. F. Fagg. 46. Burmaimia ccelestis, Don. In humidis circa Cantonem, Oct.- Nov. florentum, a. 1865, primus detexit Sampson. Found hitherto only, if I do not err, in Nipal and Silhet, unless Blume's Malayan B. javanica be the same. The Canton specimens are exceedingly fine and well developed. 47. Hijpoxis aurea, Lour. In summis montibus Pak-wan, supra Cantonem, copiose crescentem, x^rinius decerpsit Sampson, d. 6 Apr. 1870. Notwithstanding Miquel's doubts, the distribution, from the mountains of Kashmir through Cochinchina and Southern China to Japan, leaves no doubt of the identity of Don's H. minor with Loureiro's species. 48. Aponogeton monostachyos, Linn. fil. In stagno extra Can- tonem, d. 22 Aprihs 1869, detexit cl. Sampson. I do not think this genus can be separated from Naiadaceo', and, indeed, it is no doubt nearly alhed to Potamogeton. Lindley placed both genera in JuncaginacecE, but his ordinal character distinctly excludes Aponogeton. The ovules are frequently as many as ten to twelve in each ovary, inserted one above another along the ventral suture, and not basal as figured by Agardh. (' Tlieor. Syst. Plant.,' t. 3, f. 10.) The Spathium of Loureiro, supposed by Endlicher to be identical with this species, has been shown by Decaisne to be a genuine Sanruriis. 49. JuNcus Hancockii, sp. nor. Glaberrimus, radice fibrosa, culmo compresso striatulo 9-ponicari, foliis ad basin culmi tribus anguste linearibus arete complicatis apice obtuso sphacelatis 2-2^ poll, longis vaginis latiuscule membranaceo-marginatis supremo 112 SPICILEGIA FLORiE SINENSIS. infra capitulum idque vix adaequante lamina brevissima subulata terminato, capitulo 4-6-floro bracteis 3-4 badiis late ovatis eo duplo brevioribus suffulto, lloribus sessilibus, sepalis ovato-lanceolatis obtusiusculis tenuitermembrauaceis uervo teuui viridulo iuteriohbus paiilo brevioribus, staminum 6 sepala paulo superantium filamentis qiiam antlieras 3-4-plo longioribus, capsula ovoidea obtusa badia lucida sepalis stamiuibusque longiori styli trifidi basi persistente apiculata. In monte Saio Wu-tai-shan, Clnnas borealis, m. Julio 1876, coll. cl. Hancock. (Herb, propr. n. 20118.) Allied to J. leucomelas, Koyle, &c. 50. Care.v macrocephala, Willd. In ins Pu-toi, ditionis Ning- poensis, a. 1873, legit C. Alabaster. Not previously, to my know- ledge, collected in China. 51. Fimhristylis polytrichoides, Nees. Prope urbem Amoy leg. C. de Grijs. 52. Fimbristylis dichotoma, Vahl. Secus fl. West Kiver, prov. Cantouensis, Junio 1865, leg. Sampson. This is the same as Nees' F. pallescens, admitted as a species by Thwaites, by Hooker and Thomson, and others, but on what groimds I confess myself unable to understand. I have made a careful microscopic examina- tion of Indian, Ceylon, Chinese, Egyptian, Canarian, and Italian specimens, and I cannot detect the shade of a difference. 53. Fimhristylis retusa, Thw. In arenoso - graminosis ins. Danorum, Whampoae, comite F. gracilenta, mihi, ipse decei-psi, initio Augusti 1866. Only previously known from Ceylon. 54. Fimhristylis fulvescens, Thw. In sub-paludosis agri Can- tonensis, aest. 1866, coll. Sampson. Only found previously in Ceylon. 55. Scirpus {Isolepis) trijidiis, Nees. Ad cacumma montium Pak-wan, supra Cantonem, Aug. 1866, coll. Sampson. Identical with Kashmh and Ceylon specimens ; but, though admitted as a species by Drs. Hooker and Thwaites, apparently hardly separable from the North American S. capillaris, Linn. 56. Scirpus timoriensis, Kth. In scaturiginosis secus fl. Lien- chau, prov. Cantonensis, Oct. 1876, leg. Eev. J. C. Nevin. This, which is certainly quite distinct specifically from S. mucronatiis, Linn., and its immediate allies, agrees in all respects with Kunth's diagnosis. 57. FJeocharis chataria, Pi. & S. In vervactis udis prope Kam-chak, secus fl. West River, prov. Canton, m. Febr. 1867, leg. Sampson. 58. Cyperus eleiisinoides, Kth. In ruderatis, Cantone, vere 1876, coll. Rev.' J. C. Nevhi. New to the Chinese flora. I am indebted to Professor Oliver for the determination. Mr. Kurz named it for me C. infraapicalis, N. ab E., a name I cannot find in print ; but I have not access to Kornicke's papers on the genus. 59. Cyperus raccmosus, Retz. ? In agris humidis juxta Pun- tong ditionis Cantonensis, Oct. 1869, coll. Sampson. The Chinese plant, which is very closely allied to C. exalt at us, Retz. ! is identical with a Bengal one of Giiffith's, and an Assam one of Jenkins's, the latter sent me by Dr. G. King, under the name of C. alope- SPICILEGIA FLOR^ SINENSIS. 113 curoides, Rottb. A specimen which I possess labelled C. alopecuruides, and gathered by Despreaux in the Grand Canary, is, however, quite different, and very much like the Egyptian C. dives, Del. 60. Cyperus procerus, Roth. In fossis cu'ca Cantonem, d. 21 Nov. 1869, coll. Sampson. Glumes of a brighter, less rubicund and more orange tint than in Ceylon specimens, but I can detect no other difference. 61. Cyperus radiatus, Yahl. ? Ipse legi, Whampoae, Augusto, 1860, et cum prsecedente invenit Sampson. Very close to the Canarian plant I have as C. alopecur aides. 62. Panicum (^Urochloa) semialatum, R. Br. In montibus Pak- wan, alibique juxta Cantonem, non rarum. 63. Garnotia adscendens, Munro. Infra aquam desilientem, Ting-ii-shan, i^rov. Cantonensis, d. 31 Oct., 1867, coll. Sampson. The specimens seem quite identical with those from Khasia dis- tributed by Drs. Hooker and Thomson. 64. Manisuris granularis, Sw. In collibus arenoso-psammiticis ins. Danorum, Whampoae, detexit fihus Alfredus, d. 6 Aug. 1870. Recorded by Kunth, on whose authority I do not know, as a native of China ; but not to my knowledge collected there by any botanist during the present century. 65. Cryptogramma gracilis, Torr. (= Pteris Stelleri, Gmel.) In m. Siao Wu-tai-shan, Chin® borealis, Jul. 1876, leg. W. Hancock. Precisely like Canadian specimens, and more robust and better developed than Turczaninow's, gathered at the River Oka, in Siberia, which resemble Trautvetter's figure (' Imag. PI. Ross.,' t. 5.) Though, contrary to Milde's decision, I think this most likely specifically distinct from C. crispa, it certainly cannot, in any arrangement claiming to be natural, be placed in another genus, as is done by Sir W. Hooker, Mr. Baker, and Professor Eaton. The first-named writer, whilst remarking that the American fern is rather a Pellaa than a Cryptogramma, yet referred the Siberian specimens to C. crispa, R. Br. An addition to the Chinese flora. QQ. AsjAenium heterocarpum, Wall. Ad ripas torrentium, prope coenobium buddhicum Fi-loi-taz, secus amnem North River prov. Cantonensis, d. 27 Julii 1864, primus in China detexit Sampson. 67. Asplenium normale, Don. In fissuris aridis rupium, ad cacumma montium Pak-wan, prope Cantonem ; ad fauces Tsing- yiin-hap, necnon in aliis locis provinciae Cantonensis. 68. Aspidimn crenatum, Willd. (= yephrodium odoratwn, Baker.) In rupe calcarea Kai-kun-shek, secus fl. West River, prov. Can- tonensis, m. Junio 1864, primus detexit Sampson. 69. Aspidium amahile, Bl. Prope pagum Sung-tong, adversus ins. Hongkong, a. 1856, leg. b. Dr. Harland ; necnon in aliis locis Chinae australis, sed non vulgo, occm-rit. I mention this fern because, though it is included in my ' Supplement to the Flora Hongkongensis,' Mr. Baker has, by some oversight (' Journ. Bot.,' xiii., 200), stated Dr. Shearer, who met with it near Kiu-kiang, to have been its first discoverer in China. Dr. Harland's specimens 114 NOTES ON RUBI. were erroneously referred by the late Sir W. Hooker to A. drepaymm, Sw., and described by me (' Ann. Sc. Nat.,' 4e ser., xviii., 235) as a new species, under the name of A. controversum. But I subse- quently ('Ann. Sc. Nat.,' 5e ser., v., 269) corrected my mistake, and indicated the correct designation. 70. Aspidium syrmaticum, Willd. In silvis, Tmg-ii-shan, prov. Cantonensis, coll. Sampson. NOTES ON RUBI. (No II.) By Charles C. Babington, F.R.S., &c. (Continued from p. 87). 4. KuBus Salteri, Bab. — There continues to be some difficulty about the two plants which I have combined under this name, and Mr. Bloxam has not lessened it by the specimens which he recently issued in his ' Set.' I find in that collection two specimens, named respectively R. cah-atus and R. sylvaticus. In my opinion the latter specimen does not represent the plants formerly named R. sylvaticus by Bloxam in his ' Fasciculus,' and mcluded by me under that name in my ' Synopsis,' and which is now called R. mucronulatus ; nor that so named by him in Kirby's ' Flora of Leicester,' and by me as also a p)art of the //. sylvaticus, in the * Synopsis,' which is R. viUicaidis ; nor with the R. sylvaticus of the ' Rubi Germanici.' Apparently the specimens now issued as R. calvatus and R. sylvaticus both belong to the former. The synonyms of Boreau and Genevier, quoted in my 'Rubi,' must be erased. M. Genevier named a plant (gathered by Mr.' Baker at Thirsk, in 1864) R. piletostachys ; but it has an aciculate and aculeate calyx which Genevier markedly states not to be the case in his plant. The specimen from Thu'sk seems to agree better with the R. atrocaidis, MiilL, as described in 'Genev. Rubi Loire;' but then the similarly-named specimen in ' Wirtg. Herb. Rub.,* (ed. 1, fasc. i., no. 143) is not at all like our plant. The plant of Billot ('Fl. Gall, exsic.,' 2667) closely resembles our R, calvattis, but, as Genevier justly remarks, is totally devoid of set^e, although in other respects it accords faudy with our plant. Genevier says (1. c, p. 165), that it is R. mmtitiis, MiilL, not the R. piletostachys of Gren. and Godr. Other continental specimens from M. Boulay, &c., do not accord with our plant, nor, as I think, with that of Genevier. Focke quotes the ii. piletostachys of Miiller and Genevier as cer- tainly that of the ' Flore de France,' and places the plant next to R. Schlechteiidalii. 5. R. viLLiCAULis, W. (£• N. Mr. Bloxam has issued the flowering shoot of a j)lant with the name of R. viUicaulis v. derasus, which, as far as I can judge from such imperfect materials, is the same as specimens I received from him in the year 1866 as R. Bakeri (Blox. MS.), and referred to the form of R. villicaidis, NOTES ON RUBI. 115 called derasus iu my 'Eubi' {-p. 145). I still think so. It seems to be the jR. vulgaris of Lmdley's first edition of his ' Syuoi^sis.' I also possess another specimen bearing a MS. name conferred by Mr. Bloxam, — R. Warrenii, — which was gathered by Mr. F. M. Webb on Knutsford Heath, in Cheshire, and given to me by Mr. James Bagnall. Mr. Bloxam spoke doubtfully of it to the latter in 1870, and my correspondent adds : " My friend, Mr. Webb, tells me that Mr. Bloxam refers it to the Bellardiani. To me it does not appear to belong to that group, but to the Sylvatici.'' I fully concur with my excellent correspondent in this latter opinion. I gathered what is apparently E. Warrenii at Douglas, in the Isle of Man. Both of these plants seem to belong to the original Jtl. vulgaris of Lindley (not of ' Eubi Germ.'). R. Warrenii is the more prickly form, although it has very few set« on the barren stem ; but one of the specimens named by Lindley is not much less prickly. Also, the specimens called li. Bakeri by Bloxam, in 1866, with the appended remark, " It is a glandulose Bubus,'' have few prickles and scarcely a seta, but plenty of sessile glands on the barren stems. In the present state of our knowledge I think that we must include all these under the B. villicaulis ft. adscitus, the ft, derasus of my ' Eubi.' I have said B. villicaulis ft. adscitus, because it seems almost if not quite certain that I was mistaken in considering these or any of them as the B. derasus, Miill. ; but unfortunately I have not now the authenticated specimens quoted in my ' Eubi ' within my reach. Mr. Briggs, who has seen those same specimens, considers them to be different from any form of B. villicaulis, and Mr. Warren says (Jomm. of Bot., ix., 367) that B. derasus is near B. Bellardi. My B. villicaulis ft. derasus ought, therefore, to take the name of ft. adscitus as being almost certainly the B. adscitus, Genev. Mr. Briggs has written fully about B. adscitus in this Journal (ix., 366). 6. E. MUCRONULATUS, Bor. Both B. leucanthemus and B. amphi- chloros of Muller are referred to B. mucronulatus in my ' Eubi ' on the authority of specimens named by Gene^der. I now think that this is an error. Genevier places ft. leucanthemus next to B. vestitus in his ' Eonces Lou-e,' and points out that the former differs from the latter by having white flowers and stamens and green styles. I find white stamens and green styles on some, at least, of my B. vestitus. Focke places B. leucanthemus as a svnonym of B. vestitus (' Syn. Eub.,' 291). Genevier puts B. aitiphichloros very near to our aggregate species, B. wacrojjhyllus, in its form called B. umhrosus by us. It is placed under B. vulgaris by Boreau, which shows that his opinion was very nearly if not exactly the same as that of Genevier. The si^ecimens issued by Boulay (no. 10) are not precisely the same as ours. But I think that the plants may fairly be placed together. Such was the opinion of Genevier when Mr. Baker's specimens from Langloy Lead Mine were submitted to him for determination. Mr. Warren mentions in this Journal (vii., 359), but does not 116 NOTES ON RUBI. describe, a plaut which he states to be prevalent in some parts of Cheshire, and calls U. festivus, Wirtg. I have now had the loan for a short time of two specimens from Yorkshire which he authenticated as his R. festivii.s. Apparently there is no notice of this plant as a British native since that given by Mr. Warren in 1869, nor mitil now (October, 1877) have any specimens of it passed through my hands. These belong, and are returned to. Dr. F. A. Lees. They were gathered, I believe, near Sheffield. But I received what is probably the same plant from Mr. Edwin Lees many years since as a form of R. (riintheri. He found it in Harts- hill Wood, Warwickshire. I think that Mr. Warren is correct in considering the speci- mens from Yorkslm-e to be R. festivus, Miill. & Wirtg. Foreign exami)les are in 'Wirtg. Herb. Kub.' (ed. 1, fasc. v., no. 138; fasc. vi., nos. 176, 177 ; and ed. 2, fasc. ii., no. 07). The followmg character of it as a species will be found on the tickets of nos. 138 and 67 : " Caule arcuato subtereto piloso sparsim glauduloso [i.e., setoso] et aciculato, aculeis brevibus subaequalibus reclinatis, foliis quinatis et ternatis obovatis simpliciter grosse dentatis supra glabris subtus pauce pilosis, panicula longa subflexosa foliosa ramosa, ramis 3-5-floris, calycibus reflexis, sepalis longe acumi- natis, petalis rosaceis ovatis." It will be seen that this description ssays, "foliis .... simpliciter grosse dentatis," but that character is not found on the accompanying specimens, which I should describe as having "foliis minute subduplicato dentatis." But perhaps the authors had in view the leaves of the flowering shoot to which their character is more applicable, although even there I find a double dentition. Focke (* Syn.,' 314) says of the leaves: " in^qualiter argute serrata." One of the Yorkshire specimens is rather coarsely dentate, but the other is minutely and doubly dentate, and very finely and elegantly so edged. Mr. Warren seems to consider this plant as one of the Glandulosi. I have placed it with the SpectahUcs ; for Mr. E. Lees's j)lant chiefly differs from 11. mucromdatUH by having doubly dentate and thinner leaves, probably caused hj growing in shade. Some of my speci- mens from Hartshill Wood, for which I am indebted to Mr. Bloxam, and which he called the //. sijlraticiis of Leighton's ' Fasciculus,' are very nearly the typical R. mucnmnlatus ; whilst Mr. Lees's specimens, to which the same name is quoted, arc very nearly the same as those called JL festirm by Warren, and ai)proacli those published as R'.festicus by Wii'tgen. On the whole, my impression is that we are fully justified in placing the British //. festirits under //. iimcronulatm. 7. E. RUBicoLOR, ])l(>j'. This is placed as synonymous with R. Sprcni/f'lii in the ' Student's Flora.' Before doing so, I presume that Mr. Baker had seen better specimens of it than the flowering shoot which alone I find in my copy of Mr. Bloxam's recently- issued ' Set.' Genevier (1. c, 196) ajDpears to have seen only very imperfect specimens. He places it close to our 11. Sprem/cUi, which he conibmes with it. neiiiocharis, Miill. I have not seen the barren THE CRYPTOGAjNIIC FLORA OF KENT. 117 stem of Mr. Bloxam's plant, but think that the B. eruhescens, Wirtg. may be the same ; for our plant seems to accord with no. 92 of his collection (ed. 1), although not with no. 32 of his Ed. 2. Yet these numbers are considered as belonging to the same species both by Wirtgen and Focke. I find it quite impossible to form a satisfactory opinion of the plant without seeing better specimens from Atherstone. A specimen gathered by Mr. Bagnall at Man- cetter, in Warwickshire, is not sufficient for determining the true place of the plant, — indeed is hardly the same as that of Bloxam, but rather one of the Koehleriani, although gathered at the " exact spot pointed out by Mr. Bloxam." (To he continued. J THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLOEA OF KENT. By E. M. Holmes, F. L. S. (Continued from p. 64*), Lichens. Fam. Collemacei. The Collemacei present few good distinctive charactei-s, and many of them a^jpear to have such numerous forms, that great difficulty has been experienced in identifying the specimens col- lected. In compiling this portion of the Lichens it has been deemed advisable to follow the arrangement of the Eev. J. M. Crombie,! wdio has paid more attention to this group, perhaps, than any living British botanist. Several species beside those here enumerated may be expected to occur m Kent, esx^ecially in damp chalk-pits or on sand-hills near the sea, or on the greensand rocks ; among these may be mentioned Lej)toguim pcdmatiun, which is usually found amongst grass, on shelly sand near the sea, and sometimes in hedgebanke or by roadsides in hilly districts ; L. treinelloides, in damp lanes near the sea, easily recognised by its thin texture and leaden colom* when dry ; Collema cujureijatmn, on old trees ; C. melceniun and C. chalazaniwi, on mossy limestone walls ; and C. antic idatiun, in chalk-pits or on mud-caj^ped walls, on a limestone soil. The Xosto- chinea: should perhaps be classed with these Lichens, since they are probably only phases in the life-history of various species of Collema and Lepto[/iuvi. Until, however, they have all been iden- tified with different species of these genera, as X vesicariuml ^^^ * On p. 44 I omitted to state that the directions given lor examining Hepaticce are quoted from Carrington's ' Irish Cryptogams,' as Avas also Dr. Gottsche's statement concerning J. ventricosa on p. 52. + ' Journ. Bot.,' 1874, pp. 330—^07. X ' Botanische Zeitung,' la55, p. 1. 118 THE CRYPTOG.Onc FLORA OF KENT. N. commune'^^ have been with CoJlema pulposum, it will be necessary to treat them as Algae. Tribe — Collemei. CoLLEMOPSis ScHiERERii, Mass. Pi/renopsis Schccrerii, Mass. (Leigh- ton Lichen Flora.) On detached pieces of chalk in shaded damp places ; probably not unfrequent. Boxley Hill, near Maidstone ; on stones in a chalk-quarry near Kemsing. C. DiFFUNDENS, Ni/l. Pijrenopsis diffundem, Nyl. (Leighton Lich. Fl.) On greensand rocks ; rare. Maidstone ; Admiral Jones, 1865. Unfortunately the specimen collected by Admiral Jones is not in this country, so that a more exact locality cannot be given. It is, however, likely to occur in Fant Woods near Maidstone, although I have hitherto been unable to detect it here. [Collemopsis Flotowiana, Hepp., should be looked for in Kent. In Surrey it occurs together with C. Scharerii, from which it may be known by its redder and more distinct apothecia.] COLLEMA FURVUM, Ach. On limestone walls ; rare. On a bridge between Staplehm'st and Boughton Monchelsea, sparmgly, and without apothecia ; on walls near Lympne. C. PULPOSUM, Ach. On damp clayey banks ; common. Tunbridge Wells, Mr. Borrer ; Leighton Lich. Fl. Near Keston Common ; Wrotham ; Wye ; Folkestone ; Sandwich ; Shoreham. Var. C. ceranoides, Borrer. On chalky banks. On a chalky bank near High Elms, Chelsfield. The plant gathered in this locahty occurred in small isolated compact tufts, and corresponded exactly with a specimen given to me by Dr. Ralfs, to whom it was sent by Mr. Borrer. It may be here remarked that I have more than once found near Shoreham a specimen of this species in which half the thallus had the firm consistency of the Collema, and the other haK the gelatinous character and shai^e of Nostoc connnune. C. LiMosuM, Ach. On damp ground in quarries and amongst grass; not common. On a grassy spot by the roadside near Chelsfield. Appears to be only a state of C. indjyosum, with the thallus scarcely developed. C. CRISPUM, Ach. On walls m damj) shady lanes ; frequent. Abundant near Westerham ; Chelsfield. '■ ' Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences Naturelles St. Petersburg,' vol. xii. p. 118. THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. 119 C. CHEILEUM, Ach. On walls and limestone banks, frequent. Postling ; Maidstone ; Wrotliam ; Boughton Monclielsea ; Seven- oaks ; Brastead. Appears to me to be only a variety of C. crispum, Acb. C. NIGRESCENS, Ach. On exposed trunks of trees in damp places. On a willow tree near Penshui-st ; Beechborough, abundantly ; with apothecia, near Halstead. C. BIATORINUM, Xyl. On mud-capped walls and on rubble-heaps in chalk-pits. Maidstone ; Admiral Jones, 1866. In a small chalk-pit near Selling. Easily recognised by its granular mmute thallus, usually of a brownish colour, and biato^ine apothecia. Leptogium cretaceum, Sm. On chalk-stones in damp places, amongst bushes ; rare. On the Undercliff near Folkestone, abundantly, Dec. 1876. The best guide to this species is the rosulate thallus and the cells containing generally simple granula gonima, furnished with one or rarely two nucleola. L. subtile has usually two or more granula gouima m each cell. L. lacerum, Ach. Collema lacerum. (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) Amongst moss on damp banks ; not unfrequent. Hungershall Eocks ; Jenner Fl. Tunbr. Eynesford ; Wrotham ; Ightham ; Folkestone. L. subtile, Schrad. Collema subtile. (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On damp earth on grassy banks in shady lanes. Winter and early spring. In the lane leading from Eusthall Common to the High Eocks ; Jenner Fl. Tunbr. Near Halstead ; between Hadlow and Dunk's Green ; Hythe. L. sinuatum {Huds). On damp, chalky, or limestone soil amongst mosses ; frequent. Wye ; between Deal and Sandwich, with abundant apothecia. A form of this plant, approaching to L. jjalmatiwi, Huds., occurs near Sandwich, on the sand-hills. L. FRAGRANS (Svi.) On the thick bark of old trees ; rare. Kent, J/r. Borrer ; Leiyhton Lick. Fl. A specimen received from Eev. A. Bloxam, gathered on trees near Folkestone, and labelled Collema microphyllum, appears refer- able to this species. L. plicatile, Cromb. Collema plicatile, Ach. (Leighton Lich. Fl.) '" On limestone walls, not unfi-equent ; the apothecia rather rare. On a wall near Boxley Hill, Maidstone, with apothecia ; Boughton Monclielsea ; near Fant Woods and Barming, near Maidstone. 120 SHORT NOTES. A very well-marked species. Easily known from C. pulposum, when moist, by the difficulty of removing a perfect tuft, as it breaks up into a number of pieces ; when dry its angular lobes and reticulated surface serve to distinguish it. L. TURGIDUM (Ach.) On old mossy walls, and in chalk-quarries ; frequent. Walls near Maidstone ; Wrotham ; Westerham ; Postling ; Newington, near Sandgate, sparingly. A form of this plant, like Collema confertum, with closely- packed apothecia, occurs on a flint wall between Chelsfield and Down. L. ScHEADERi (Bernh.) On mud-capped limestone walls, amongst mosses, and on rubble- heaps in chalk-quarries ; frequent. The apothecia are rare. Near Chelsfield ; Wrotham ; Shoreham ; Folkestone ; near Otford, with a few apothecia (January.) In the sterile state this may be known from L. turgidum by the thalline lobes being dilated upwards so as to be somewhat wedge- shaped in outline, and when fertile by the apothecia being lateral instead of terminal, as in L. turgidum. L. MICROSCOPICUM, Nijl. On chalk stones or greensand rocks ; rather rare. Fant Woods, near Maidstone ; sterile. Differs from L. cretaceum in its more erect habit and denser mode of growth, and from L. subtile in the lobes of the thallus being more cylindrical and less broad. Pyrenidium actinellum, Xyl. On chalk ; very rare. Boxley Hill ; Admiral Jonex, 1865. I have repeatedly searched this locality in vain for this Lichen. Admiral Jones' specimen in the British Museum has no apothecia upon it. ( To he continued, j SHORT NOTES. Chara connivens, " Sahm,'' A. Braun. — There is a plant in the Kew Herbarium, labelled " in fresh water ditches at Stokes Bay, Gosport, Rev. W. S. Bayton, 1828," which apparently belongs to this species ; the specimen being small and imperfect, renders it difficult to determine satisfactorily. It closely resembles one of Kralik's Tunisian specimens (no. 344 bis), and, like it, differs from the typical form, in having rather shorter nucules and slightly longer bracts. This species should be looked for in the southern counties. It may be roughly distinguished from C. fragifera, its nearest ally, by its incurved branchlets and brittle character ; from C. aspera and C. galiuides, by the total absence of spines ; and from ('. fr^igilis, by being dicecious. — H. & J. Groves. NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 121 EosA SEPiuM, Thuill. — As the recorded occurrence of this species in Surrey rests on a single hush found by Mr. Baker at Hindhead, I think it may he worth while to state that I found it in large quantity on the Hog's Back, near Puttenham, last autumn. — H. GrROYES. Notices of JSoofts antf itttmotrs^. Die Schiitzmittel der Pflamen fjegen Thieve uud Wetterungunst und die Fraye vom sahfreien Urmeer. (The means by which lolants are protected against animals and unfavourable weather, and the question of the primitive freshwater sea.) Von Otto Kuntze. Leipzig, Arthur Felix. 1877. There are two kinds of botanical traveller, differing from each other as much as it is possible to conceive : the one kind consists of those who content themselves mth amassing specimens without paying attention to life-history ; the other is of a very different complexion, and mcludes such men as Grif&th, Eobert Brown, and the author of that charming book 'The Naturahst in Nicaragua.' It is an example of the work of a member of the latter class that we now have before us ; and though we cannot but thmk that some of the views here advocated are inadmissible, yet the ore predominates greatly over the dross ; and the author may be con- gratulated on having pushed on a pace or two the slowly but sm-ely moving branch of om- science which takes cognisance of the adaptation of means to ends. In order to give a clear notion of the scope of the work it will be most convenient to briefly run over the principal cited methods of protection. From animals plants are protected by possession of runners ; by close growth (thus effectually banishing animals too large to force a passage) ; by growing under sheltering bushes (this apphes of com-se to herbs) ; by twining habit ; by epiphytic habit ; by presence of spines and thorns (protection against grazmg birds) ; by all forms of trichomes (these, besides hiudermg browsers, pre- vent crawhng up of msects, &c.) ; by production of organs and tissues suitable to ant-habitation ; by growing in water, and by havmg leaves adapted to hold water at then- bases ; by rings of hau-s on stem, &c. (agauist crawling insects) ; by slippery waxy smiaces ; by milky sap (this, besides bemg poisonous to grazing animals, by its exudation impedes the movements of small climbing creatures) ; by presence of ethereal oils m all parts, including the seed (di-ives away insects) ; by corky tissues ; by possession of leathery leaves which may be distasteful to grazing anunals ; by development of tubers, bulbs and alhed structures ; by revolution of leaf-margins and of corolla-tips (renders climbing difficult to ants) ; by the absence of chlorophyll ; by poisonous or bitter prin- ciples developed chiefly in seeds, these also being protected by their hardness, leathery consistence and small size. 122 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Protections against unfavourable weather are — runners (which support plants against overweight of snow in alpine and polar regions, and by admitting of a complete covering of snow are enabled to resist the otherwise fatal effects of frost) ; aerial roots — props against land- storms and dash of the waves ; gregarious habit lessening the force of the wind, a result accomplished also by the horizontal position of the branches, by development of small scaly leaves, and by possession of leafy crowns, deep roots and strong or slim stems ; hauy clothing, which protects against cold, rain and undue transpiration, and also intercepts and retains ram and dew ; irritability to light or touch ; possession of a waxy outer layer and of a strong cuticle ; a thick sap which, owing to the hygroscopic property of its solid constituents, keeps the cu'culation active during the period of greatest sun-heat and the dry season ; ethereal oils which, gradually evaporatmg, produce resin, a layer of which, accumulating on the evaporating surfaces, lessens the amount of transph'ation ; the thick sap of plants growing in deserts, where the difference between the temperature of day and night is very great, containing amorphous substances which are bad conductors of heat, i^rotects them against injury from the daily great variations of temperature ; phyllodes, and leaves occupying the position of phyllodes, being less trans^ju-able, are adaptations to a diy climate ; presence of corky tissues which protect against fi'ost, &c. ; absence of stomata, which in some cases prevents entry of thawing snow ; thickened roots, &c., which are stores of nutriment and water, and i^reserve life during times of di'ought ; besides the many arangements by which the reproductive organs are protected from rain, dew and Avind. The author shows ready command of all recent information on vegetable function, such as the intoxicating properties of grasses, and the reci^jrocal relations between ants and their plant-homes. He is a strong advocate for fertilization by means of dew, in the case of spicate grasses and of lowly small-flowered herbs, such as Saylna and liadiola. He concludes that, as a general rule, scented fruits fall and attract gnawmg insects, while un- scented ones are brightly coloured and attractive to bu'ds. His view of the origin of cleistogamy agrees in some respects with Mr. Darwin's, and he remarks with regard to it that wheat and barley are cleistogamous only in cold regions, and that Oryza clandestina is in the same condition only during cold summers : he also thinks that liabihty to have the nectar stolen without resulting pollination may be a state of things from which cleistogamy may result. Probably none who have thought much about the phylo- geny of vegetation will disagree with the conclusion that the gramineous type is one of degradation, though they may be un- willing to subscribe to the view that differentiation of the forms has occurred for the most part in temperate regions, and that the lowly grasses found in the tropics are migrants of the glacial period. It is worthy of mention, too, that this author ranges him- self on the side of those who think that Gymnosperms and Mono- cotyledons have originated near to but not from one another. The NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIES. 123 requirements of space, however, will not allow us to enter fiu'ther into the views of si^ecial evolution here enunciated. The chief objection we have to take relates to the uncontrolled way in which the author allows one or two special hobbies to take possession of his imagmation. For mstance, he tries to show that the principal agent in vegetable differentiation has been coohng of the earth ! We are soiTy to say, too, that we think he fails entirely to establish the truth of his chief hobby — the primitive fresh-water sea ; x^i'ii^i^i'^^s, that is to say, m the sense here adopted. According to this, the great-rooted plants of the coal- measui-es floated in a vast ocean of fresh water, the existence of the roots bemg cited as a mam x3roof of this extraordinary position ! In spite of these serious drawbacks, however, w^e have a hearty feelmg of thankfulness tow^ards the author for giving us this book. S. M. A few additions to the list of Cleistogamous plants have recently been made. Asa Gray (' SiUiman's Journal,' 1878, p. 71) notes that Mr. Pringle has communicated to him that the con- dition occurs in Dalibarda repeiu, in ' JJantlionia spicata and its allies, and in Yilfa and other grasses.' Closed flowers of Collomia coccinea have been tigm'ed and described by F. Ludwig in ' Bo- tanische Zeitung ' for December, 1877. The following interesting facts will be found in the 2nd and 3rd parts of Mr. Fitzgerald's 'Australian Orchids,' the first pai*t of which we have already noticed. Spiranthes australis, Ldl., offers a great contrast with -S'. autuninalis, for in it the anther shrinks back, leaving the persistent pollinia exposed. In the many flow^ers examined, the pollinia were not deranged in the slightest degree, and some force even was required to break them up; no trace of pollen was found on the stigma, although abundance of seed was set. The only conclusion is that fertilization takes place by contact of the edge (and possibly part of the inner side) of the stigma with the j)ollinia. The same curious method of fertilization was found to occur in the case of Onhoceras strictuw. It was observed that a flower of Caladenia tessellata, Fitzgerald, was fertilized by an insect endeavouring to escape from its cocoon ; it is ingeniously suggested that perhaps this may often occur, as the dorsal sepal would conveniently shelter an insect about to undergo metamorphosis. Species of Pramphjllmn show the benefit derived from a gregarious habit, the solitary plants frequently having not a flower fertilized, the gregarious one being all fertilized. We wish Mr. Fitzgerald would study the vegetative habit of his favourites. Count Solms-Laubach has printed in the 'Linn^ea' (Bd. viii, heft 1, February, 1878) the monograph of Pandanacece upon which he has been for some years engaged. He recognises but two genera, Pandanus, Linn, f., and Freycinetia, Gaud., the former with 50, the latter with 28 species fahdy well known, but each with 12'! NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. a considerably long list of indeterminable names mainly from Gaudicliaud in ' Voyage de la Bonite.' Count Solms divides Pandaniis into eight sections (types) by the structure of the ovary and male flowers ; he gives, when possible, full descriptions and synonymy ; and having had the opportunity of examining all the principal European herbaria, he clears up several pieces of con- fused synonymy. In Pandanus we find six new species, and in Freycinetia no less than nine. The paper was printed before the a]Dpearance of Dr. I. B. Balfour's account of the Mascarene species in Baker's ' Flora of Mauritius,' but the author adds a short sup- plementary note, giving the names of the additions made in Dr. Balfour's monograph. The Bulletin of the Bussey Institution (January, 1878) contains the second part of Prof. Farlow's List of Fungi found near Boston, which is followed by numerous critical notes on the species and on others from various parts of the United States. The 75th fascicle of the ' Flora Brasiliensis ' was published on February 1st. It contains the HippocrateaceiB, by J. Peyritsch ; the Meliacecc, by Cas. DeCandoUe ; and the Hedei-acece, by E. Marchal. Other New Books. — A. Kerner, ' MonographiaPulmonariarum,' 1878, 13 plates (Innsbruck, 12.s.) — A. Bras, ' Catalogue des Plantes Vasculaires du Departement de I'Aveyron,' 1877 (Villefranche, 85.) — A. GruiLLAUD, ' Recherches sur I'Anatomie Comparee et le Deve- loppement des Tissues de la Tige des Monocotyledons ' (Paris, Masson.) — C. Grand-Eury, ' Flore Carbonifere du Departement de la Loire,' 3 vols., 1877 (Paris, Baudry.) — A. G. Nathorst, 'Beitrage zm- Fossilen Flora Schwedens,' 6 plates (Stuttgart, E. Koch.) — W. E. McNab, ' Botany, Outlines of Morphology and Physiology ' (London, Longmans, 1878, Is. 6d.; ' London Science Class-Books. ') — G. A. Lebour, ' Illustrations of Fossil Plants, being an Autotype Reproduction of Selected Drawings ' (Newcastle-on-Tyne, 1877.) — Id., ' Catalogue of Hutton Collection of Fossil Plants (Newcastle on-Tyne, 1878.) Articles in Journals. — February, 1878. Trans. Linn. Soc. Loud. (ser. 2, i., pt. 5.) — Cas. DeCandolle, ' On the Geographical Distribution of Meliacecc ' (tab. 80, 31.) — W. A. Leighton, 'New British Lichens' (tab. 32.) — Id., ' New Iiish Lichens' (tab. 33.) — J. G. Baker, ' Report on the Liliacecc, Iridacew, Hi/poxidacew, and Ha'inodorace(e of Welwitsch's Angolan Her- barium' (tab. 34-36.) — C. Knight, ' Contributions to the Licheno- graphy of New Zealand ' (tab. 37, 38.)— M. T. Masters, ' On some points m the Morphology of Prinmhicea- ' (tab. 39-41). Journ. Linn. Soc. Loud. (No. 95, February 27th.) — J. Ball, ' Siiicilegium Florae Moroccanae ' (continued, tab. 21-26). I hill. Soc. Dot. France (1877, pt. 2). — C. Richon, 'On three inte- resting Fungi' {Pilacre p. — Viget ad Nikko ditione japonica unde misit cl. Bisset. ALABASTRA DIVERSA. 131 Caulis primariiis 2-5 cm. long., infra radices mnltas tennes emittens. Folia ad 10 cm. long., juniora vero multo breviora : foliola lateralia 0-7-l'5 cm. long., petiolulis laminam aequantibus vel ea brevioribus vel raro omnino deficientibus. Sepala 8 cm. long. Petala fragilia, alba. Cax3sula immatnra 1*5 cm. long. Species ob multas notas valde singularis. Thermopsis cmNENSis, Benth. MSS. — T. caule erecto ramoso villosulo demum glabro, foliolis sessilibus obovatis vel oblongo- obovatis apiculatis glabris, stipulis lanceolatis glabris, racemis?^- terminalibus plurifloris, bracteis simplicibus pedicello brevioribus vel ei snbffiqualibus raro pauUo brevioribus, calycis labio superiore bifido segmentis rotundatis lobis inferioribus lanceolatis, carina alis parum mmore, ovario subsessili, legumine (baud maturo) lineari-acuto, recto, villoso. Hab. — Crescit in Gliina, Fortune, A. 54 ! Shanghai, Maingay, Ningpo, C. W. Ecerard. In Ins. Loo Choo legit C. Wright, no. 67 ! Prope 2-pedalis. Foliola usque ad 4-3 cm. long, et 1-8 cm. lat. : stipulae ad 3-5 cm. long., petiolos interdum superantes. Bractese ovato-lanceolatae, villosulaB. Calyx circiter 0*8 cm. long., viUo- sulus. Carina (ungue incluso) 2-3 cm. long. Legumen immatu- rum ad 8-5 cm. long. A T.fahacea, DC., cui sat similis discrepat precipue floribus minoribus et stipulis angustioribus. Indigofera [Euindigofera, Pinnata) Wynbergensis, sp. nov. — Fruticosa, stricta, caule tereti ramoso deinde obscure pruinoso, ramuHs erectis tenuibus primo patenti-pubescentibus, foliis sub- sessilibus apicem versus caulis ramulorumque congestis 2-jugis, foliolis suberectis subsessilibus lineari-oblongis apiculatis sub- coriaceis ajDpresse strigoso-pubescentibus 0-5-1-7 cm. long., racemis ascendentibus longe pedunculatis multifloris, floribus parvis, calj^cis strigoso-pubescentis lobis subaequalibus subulatis tubo longioribus, vexillo ovato sessili, petalis sericeis calycem vix superantibus, ovario sessih, pluries-ovulato, legumine tereti recto acuminato glabro. Hah. — In solo arenoso in fruticetis prope Wynberg Afr. Aust. legit H. Bolus (no. 2774 !). Species ad I. Dregeanam proxime accedit, sed caule ramoso, foliis 2-jugis, foliolis minoribus baud canescentibus, floribus legu- minibusque multo minoribus primo intuitu distinctissima. Caulis 45 cm. alt, infra nudo : ramuHs indivisis 4-0-9-0 cm. long. Fo- Holorum rachis 0-2 cm. long. Pedunculi rigidi, fere glabri, 3-5-6-0 cm. long. Eacemi breves. Pedicelli 0-2 cm. long., sub fructu duplo longiores. Flores circiter 0-3 cm. long. Calycis lobi tenues. Legumine 1*5 cm. long., 0-15 cm. lat. Rhynchosia (I Orthodanum) clivorum, sp. nov. — Erecta, suf- fruticosa, hirsutula, foliis manifeste petiolatis, foliolis ovato-lanceo- latis subtus conspicue nervosis, stipulis pro sectione magnis ob- longis acuminatis reflexis membranaceis, racemis foliis brevioribus paucifloris, calycis lobis oblongis acutis in?equaHbus inferiore longiore et carinam leviter superante superioribus latioribus tube longioribus vix basi connatis, vexillo ovato carinae amplae sequi- 4 132 ALABASTRA DIYERSA. longo, stylo leviter incrassato, legumiue oblongo basi angustato villoso 2-spermo. Hah. — In clivis moutosis prope ' Pilgrim's Best Gold Fields', Afr. Aust. siibtrop. legit J. H. McLea (Herb. Bolus, no. 3033 !). Foliola 4-0-5'0 cm. long., 2'0-2-5 cm. lat., supra inconsj)icue bullata. Stipulae prope 1 cm. long., intus glabrae. Calycis tubus 0-5 cm. long., lobus inferior 1-1 cm. long. Vexillum vix 1-5 cm. long. Legumen I'5 cm. long. Semina subreniformia, vix stro- pliiolata. Species ab affinibus sectionis Orthodani obvestitum et foliolorum formam et flores magnos praeter alias notas facile distinguenda. SwARTZiA (Series Tounatea') amazonica, sp.nov. — 8. foliis 2-3- (interdum 4 ?-) jugis, foliolis oblongo -ovatis obtusis basi leviter cuneatis supra nitentibus subtus j)allidioribus prominule nervosis furfuraceis demum glabris, racemis lateralibus infra folia ortis plurifloris, sepalis extus tomentosis intus sublaevibus, petalo nuUo, antlieris subuniformibus, ovario oblongo-falcato villoso, stylo un- cinato-inflexo quam in 8. sericeo parum longiore. Hah. — Crescit ad Tonantins in Brasilia ubi legit J. W. H. Traill (no. 163 !). 'Arbor 40-50 ped. alt.' Bamuli teretes, cinerei. Petiolus com- munis 10-12 cm. long., primo fusco-tomentellus deinde glaber, basi ipsa interdum leviter incrassatus : foliola adulta 12-15 cm. long., 6-7 cm. lat. : petioluli circiter 0*5 cm. long., robusti. Stipulae et stipella desunt. Kacemus circiter 8 cm. long., albide furfuraceo- tomentosus. Bractese ovatae, ut videtur subcarinatge, inflexae, intus glabra, 0-3 cm. long. Pedicelli bracteis bis terve longiores. Flores cii-citer 0-8 cm. diam., odorati. Sepala ovato-oblonga, obtusa, circiter 0-5 cm. long. Legumen hand visum. Afiinis 8. sericece, Vogel, sed differt inter alia foliolis, floribus minoribus, antlieris subrenif ormibus . EuBus [Opjwsitifolii, sect, nov.) paradoxus, sp.nov. — Fruticosa?, glabra, inermis, caule dichotomo subtereti tenui, foliis simplicibus breviter petiolatis per paria sub^qualia vel quam maxime inae- qualia oppositis coriaceis ovatis obtusis crenato-serratis, stipulis minimis setaceis, floribus axillaribus solitariis vel ad apicem ramu- lorum digestis, calycis lobis late ovatis apiculatis extus fere glabris intus tomentosis, petiolis sepala vix superantibus, ovariis ut apparet jequilater 2-ovulatis. Hah. — In China nee collectore nee loco indicato. Exstat speci- men unicum sat imperfectum in herb. Kew ex herb. Lindl. derivatum. Folia ad 4-2 cm. long, et 2*7 cm. lat. : petioli 0-6 cm. long. ; stipulis 2-plo longiores. Pedunculi ad 1-5 cm. long., giabri. Flores vix 1 cm. diam. Calycis lobi 0*5 cm. long. Fructus ma- turus infeliciter deest. Species singularis omnibus ab congeneri- bus hucusque cognitis discrepat foliis oppositis ; quamobrem in sectionem novam mihi videter rite ponenda. Aster (Diplopappus) turbinatus, sp. nov. — Perennis ? caule erecto simplici vel ramoso anguloso puberulo, foliis rigidis sparsis crebrisve ovato-oblongis acutis nunc lanceolatis amplexicaulibus ALABASTRA DIVERSA. 133 obsciu'e aiDicnlato-crenatis scabridissimis subtus pallidis, capitnlis pseudosessilibns axillaribus, involucri turbinati bracteis multi- seriatis seriis inferioribiis pedimculum omnino tegentibus ovatis obtusis l-nerviis ciliolatis, pappi setis subsequalibiis laevibiis albidis acheuium immaturnm proi^e 8-plo superantibus. Hah. — Crescit in China, Fortune (104! et 19!); ad Ningpo, Everard. Radix deest. Folia ad 6*0 cm. long. (i3lerumque 8-5-4-0 cm.) Capitula projpe 2-0 cm. diam. Involucrum ad 2*0 cm. long. Aclienia immatura angnlata, iDuberula. i^ffinitatem proximam cum A. haccharoidi, Steetz, liabet : ab linjus formis omnibus vero eximie discrepat foliis scabridioribus amplexicaulibus capitulisque pluriseriatis pseudosessilibns . Garuleum album, $2^. nov. — G. caule erecto abundanter folioso robusto demum fere glabro, foliis sessilibus lyrato-pinnatifidis supra scabridissimis subtus tomentellis serratis serraturis crebris indm-atis, pedunculis elongatis capitula majuscula gerentibus, invo- lucri bracteis ovatis acutis exterioribus tomentellis, fl. disci stylis ramis brevibus lanceolatis, aclieniis compressis rugosulis. Hah. — In Kafiiiand, Afric. Aust. legit Reed. R. Baur., no. 226 ! Caulis 0-6 cm. diam. Folia ad 7*5 cm. long. Pedunculi circiter 4-0 cm. long., albido-tomentelli. Aclienia 0-5 cm. long. Adsunt flores inter eos radii et disci ambigentes. A nostra planta differt G. latifoUurn, Harv., caule minus robusto, foliis tenuibus hand tomentosis, pedunculis longioribus, involucri bracteis angustioribus. Centaurea (§ Acrocentron) ebenoides, Heldr. MS8. Sesqui- pedalis, perennis, caule gracili araneoso-cano demum glabro inferne crebre folioso superne subnudo 1-cephalo, foliis (infimis lougius) petiolatis pinnatim sectis plus minus lyratis segmentis lateralibus utrinque 3-9 oblanceolatis vel fere deltoideis et acutis integerrimis vel obscurissime 2-3-lobatis, segmento terminali ovato nunc ovato- lanceolato integro vel obscure utrinque lobato foliorum summorum lateralibus subsimili segmentis omnibus una cum petiolo araneoso- canis nequaquam glabris, capitulis mediocribus terminalibus ovatis baud globosis, involucri sparsissime araneosi pliyllis firmis iiife- rioribus ac intermediis ovatis breviter pectinato-ciliatis in spinulam teiiuem patulo-recurvem in inferioribus laminam subaequantem in superioribus ea multo breviorem abeuntibus, pliyllis intimis reli- quis longioribus oblongis margine membranaceis baud pectinatis muticis, corollis siccitate pallide roseis. Hah. — In sylvis partibus in septentrionalibus insula Euboepe, ubi detexit ill. J. S. Mill. Folia infima 8 cm., summa vix.4 cm. long. ; segmenta lateralia ad 1-3 cm., seg. terminale ad 8 cm. long. Involucri i)liylla ima (spinis inclusis) vix 0*5 cm., intermedia circiter 1*0 cm., iiitima vix 1*5 cm. long. Aclisenia matura baud visa. Ex affinitate C. scopulorum, Boiss. & Hildr., abs qua abborret liabitu, foliolorum magnitudineetvestitu, capitulis minoribus, iiivolucro valde diverso. I cannot understand bow tbis beautiful species escaped M. Boissier's notice, it baving been gathered by Mr. Mill as long ago as 1862. Perhaps the Kew specimen is unique. \ 134 ALABASTEA DIVERSA. Primula (§ Auric id a strum) modesta, Biss. d S. Moore. — Vix pedalis, foliis spatliulatis dentato-serratis subtus farinosis, scapo in examplaiio unico viso 12 cm. alt. utrinque sulcato glabro 10- floro, bracteis brevibus setaceis, pedicellis elongatis, calycis cam- pannlati segmentis oblongis obtusiusculis tubiim sub^qnautibns, corollcB mediocris tubo calycem dnplo superante fauce nudo limbi segmentis bilobis, staminibus juxta fanccm inclusis, stigmate brevi. \^ah. — In Japonia ad Nikko detexit cl. Bisset mense Maj. florens. Folia in specimene nostro 16, ad 6-0 cm. long, et 1*1 cm. lat., supra glabra. Bracteae 0-5 cm. long., pedunculis 5-6-plo breviores. Calyx 4 cm. long., glaber. Flores 1 cm. diam., cserulei. Capsula hand visa. Accedit ad P. farinosain, L., sed calyce minora ac latiore floribus longius pedmiculatis foliis dentato-serratis ab omnibus ejus varietatibus bene distincta. A P. algida Ad. cui valde affinis distat ob folia farinosa minus dentata calycemquc minor em. jusTiciA (^ Betonica) fittonioides, sj). nor. — Subacaulis, foliis 4 petiolatis pro genere maximis late cordato-ovatis obtusissimis supra scabriusculis subtus secus nervos sparsim strigoso-pube- scentibus, spicis terminalibus longe pedmiculatis pluri-parvifloris, bracteis parum conspicuis late ovatis obtusis, calycis segmentis 5 fere sequalibus lanceolatis, corollas tubo erecto labio postico breviter bifido, lilamentis dilatatis glabris, disco cyatliiformi obscurissime lobato, ovario oblongo supra angustato minute puberulo, stylo integro, capsulis probabiliter 4-spermis, seminibus tuberculatis retinaculis truncatis suftultis. Hah. — In 'Nyika Country,' Afr. Trop. Orient, coll. Revd. T. Wakefield. Caule fere obsoleto, radicante. Folia ad 11 cm. long, et 10*5 cm. lat. : petioli vix ad 5*5 cm. long., sparsim strigoso-pubescentes. SpicEe 5 cm. long. Pedunculi ad 11 cm. alt., stricti. Bracteae 6 cm. long., 4 cm. lat., obscure ciliatae. Calycis segmenta prope 4 cm. long., corollas tubo paullo minora. A most remarkable species, with tlie habit of one or two American species. As there are ripe seeds, it is to be hoped that we shall be able to introduce a curious novelty into cultivation. EuELLiA ARUENSis, sp. fiov. — Caulc asccndcute quadrangular! hirsuto ^tate scabriusculo, foliis petiolatis oblongis vel oblongo- obovatis obtusis crenatis supra pubescentibus subtus crassinerviis hirsutis, floribus subsessilibus in foliorum superiorum axillis positis, bracteis bracteolisque oblongis acuminatis calyce multo brevioribus, calyce profunda 5-partito segmentis linearibus acutis hirsutis, corollae tubo gracili calycem 2^-plo excedentc limbo 5-lobo lobis obovatis obtusis, staminibus prope faucem coroll^e insertis antheris 2-locularibus loculis subrequalibus basi obtusis vel mucro- nulatis, capsulis tetragonis obtusis glabris calycem subaequantibus fere a basi circiter 20-spermus. Herba perennis ? semipedalis vel ultra. Foha 2-4 unc. longa, f-1^ unc. lata; petioh ^-f unc. longi, hirsuti, aetate scabriuscuh. ALABASTEA DIYEKSA. 135 Calyx 1 unc. longus. Corolla extus pubesceus ; limbus fere f nnc. diam. Antlieree oblongae. Stylus pubesceus. Semina suborbiculata. Hah. — In insulis Aru coll. H. N. Moseley. This plant forms part of by far the most interesting portion of the botanical collections made during the ' Challenger ' Expedition — the portion obtained in the Indian Archipelago, North Australia, and the Admiralty Islands. The flora of the latter islands being enthely unknown, I greatly regret that I did not pursue my original intention of preparing a memoh in extenso upon it. I may state here that the Admiralty Islands have a well-marked Malayan- flora ; so that G-risebach's a priori conclusion (see map in ' Vege- tation der Erde ') is amply sustamed. Nepeta {^ Macronepeta) Eyeeardi, sp. nov. — Erecta, levissime puberula, foliis longe petiolatis ovatis acuminatis basi late trun- catis nunc cordatis grosse serrato-crenatis, verticillastris laxis ^ pedunculatis paucifloris, calycis dentibus triangularibus acutis i^ postico paullo latiore et longiore, corolla tubo gracili supra am- pliato, labio postico 2-fido, labii antici lobo mediano crenulato, staminibus inclusis, disco antice tumente. Hab. — Ad Ningpo Sinensium legit C. W. Everard. Caulis gracilis paucifolius. Folia superiora tantum visa 6-5 era. long., medio 3-0 cm. lat. ; petioli foliis subaequilongi. Folia floralia lanceolata. Pedunculi 1-1-3 cm. long. Calyx 0-5 cm. long., coroll^e tubo vix 4-plo breviore. Fructus baud visus. N. macranthce, Fisch. arete affinis, sed distat ob foliorum formam, flores multo minores, calycem prope rectum &c. A N, ur- ticafolia (DracocejjJialo , Miq.), cujus folia fere omnino habet, differt praeter alias notas inflorescentia et floribus multototies minoribus. Polygonum (§ Bistorta) tenuicaule, Biss. dt 8. Moore. — Glabra, rhizomate nodoso, foliis radicalibus longe petiolatis oblongo- ovatis vel ovato-lanceolatis obtusis in petiolum sensim decurrentibus, caule folia radicalia sub^quaute gracillimo juxta medium folium l^ unicum parvum ovatum obtusum et nonnunquam altius ochream efoliatam gerente, folii caulini ochrea modica ab apice foliigera, spicis terminalibus brevibus plurifloris, pedicellis floribus longi- tudme subaequalibus bractea (interdum duplo) longioribus, stami- nibus exsertis. Hab. — Crescit ad Nikko ditione japonica, ubi eam detexit el. Bisset. Folia radicalia (una cum petiolo) ad 15 cm. long. ; petiolus solus ad 8 cm. long. ; lamina 2-3 cm. lat. ; foha caulina ad 1-1 cm. long. ; fohorum caulinorum ochrea laminam et petiolum asquans. Spica 2 cm. long. Achaenia triquetra. P. Bistorta; ac P. viriparo proxima, sed distinctissima ob fo- liorum formam, habitu pseudo-scapigero, spicas diversas aliasque notas. Gymnadenia PiNGuicuLA, Bckb. f. cO S. Moore. — Habitus S. try- phimforwis, Rchb. f., sed uniflora, 3-4 polhcaris, folio ovato acuti- C^ usculo sessih nunc breviter pedunculato basi vaginis paucis par\is 136 ALABASTRA DIVERSA. membranaceis cincto, caule gracili juxta medium univaginato, bractea vagiuas cousimili ovario multo breviore, flore maximo Pbhiuicidaiii (mirabile tlictu) in meutem revocante, sepalis ovatis, labello flabeliato trifido lo])is lateralibns ovatis trimcatis (ut apparet) patentibus lobo medio lateralibns minore integro vel emarginato. Hah. — Ad Niugpo Siueiisium coll. C. W. Everard. Folia 2- 5-3- 5 cm. long. Sej)ala 0.5 cm. long. Labellum props ad 1'5 cm. lat. Calcar 1-5 cm. long. Ad * a little Orchid picked up by a surgeon ' in herb. Lindl. proxime accedit, sed distat folio solitario, floribus multototies ma- joribus, calcari comparate longiore. Habenaria plectomaniaca, Bc/ih. f. (t. S.Moore. — Ultra bipedalis, foHis in caulis basi lineari-ligulatis acutis pluribus, superioribus vaginffiformibus, racemo plurifloro, bracteis oblongis acuminatis ovaria ^Dedicellata vix dimidio eequantibus, sepalo impari ligulato obtuse acuto, sepalis lateralibus multo majoribus irregularibus oblongis extus obtusis, apiculo sub apice sepali imparls in limbo superiori medio, tepalis bipartitis partitione externa lineari-acumi- nata uninervi interna oblongo-acuminata i^lurmervi multo majori, labelli tripartiti partitione media lineari-lancea acuminata recta, partitionibus lateralibus subasqualibus subbrevioribus introrsum forcipatis calcari filiformi apicem versus sensim valide ampliato ovario pedicellate ^quali imo longiore, anthera apiculata canalibus elongatis rostello apice acuto, cruribus stigmaticis longe productis ampliatis retusis. Hah.— In ' Nyika Country,' Afr. Trop. Or., coll. Reed. T. Wakefield. Si^ecies affines sunt H. Huilhp, catapJn/sema, anaphyseina, ich- neiunoma, quc^ omnes calcarum indole, tepalis, floribusque minori- bus longe recedunt. H. O. Reichenhach fil. Habenaria stylites, Rchh.f. d S. Moore. — Ultra pedalis, caule basi — , vaginis superioribus triangulis acuminatis, racemo densi- floro multifloro, bracteis linearibus carinatis ovaria pedicellata dimidio ffiquantibus, sepalo impari oblongo-acuminato cassideo sepalis paribus oblongis acutis, tepalis bipartitis partitione externa lineari-acuta uniner^d partitione interna falcata uninervi sub^quali, labelli tripartiti partitionibus subfiequalibus lineari-lanceis trinerviis calcari filiformi apicem versus paulo ampliato ovario pedicellato longiore, antherae canalibus arrectis brevibus, cruribus stigmaticis elongatis apicem versus clavatis retusis. Hah. — N}dka Country, Trop. Afr. Orient, coll., Rrrd. T.Wakefield. Hahenaria inacrandra^ Ldl., subaffinis est. In nostra folia mfima adhuc ignota. H. (r. Reichenhach fil. LissocHiLus Wakefieldi, Rchb. f. <(' S. Moore Affinis L. ca- loptero, Echb. f., labelli lobo medio energetice gibbo convexo retinervi nee simplicmervi, flore plus duplo majore. Eacemus pluriflorus nunc fractiflexus. Bracteae triangulo-setaceie ovaria pedicellata longe non sequantes. Sepala oblonga apiculata tepalis multo minora plus duplo breviora. Tepala elliptica acuta ALABASTRA DIVERSA. 137 energetice retiiiervia. Labellum trilobum ; lobi laterales rotimdati extrorsnm flexi iu lobum anticnm ellipticum acutum medio gibbum disco quinqne-carinatum excurrentes, cariiiis externis paulo ob- literatis. Calcar breve prope rectangulnm retrorsum more L. calupteri quo a L. aurantiaco, Oliveriano, Grantii, bene recedit. Hab. — Ill Nyika Comitry, Afr. Trop. Orient., coll. Herd. T. Wakefield. L. specioso, Ldl., affinis, qui recedit labellilobis lateralibus retusis abruptis non cum lobo medio conflueutibus. H. (J. Reichenhach Jil. Angracum eburneum (A. virens, Ldl.), Pet. Tli. in Nyika Country detexit Bevd. T. Wakefield. Det. hsec benigne fecit amiciss. H. G. Reichenbach fil. Dendrobium (§ Dendrocoryne) chloropterum, Rchb.f. d S.Moore [Tab. 196] . — i>. flore carnoso brevi mento valde evoluto angulato, sepalo imparl semilanceo sepalis paribus triangulis latis, tepalis semilanceis angustioribus microscoiDice serrulatis, labeUo trifido laciniis lateralibus parvis curvatis semifalcatis lacinia antica obcor- data maxima callo in disco labelli papillari elevato ligulato medio utrinque unidentato antice in lamellas duas perpendiculares diviso, columnse parte libera prona parva crassa. Hab. — Patria ignota. Vidimus in hort. Kew. culta. Caulis quasi pseudobulbosus, foliis subaequilongis basi angus- tatus, aj)ice 2-folius. Folia coriacea, ovato-oblonga, obscure biden- tata, ad 12 cm. long, et 4 cm. lat. Pedunculus e dorso folii exaxillaris, teres, erectus, caulem fere duplo superans, sparsim vaginiferus, superne pauciflorus. Bracteffi jDarvae, triangulares, pedicellis elongatis multo minores. Flos prasinus 2-4 cm. diam. : labelli callus et columns pes albi. Pollinia aurantiaca optime evoluta. Flos telae carnosae illi D. adunci, Wall., sat similis ; labelli fabrica D. tridentiferi, Ldl. contra multo similior. Dr. Reichenbach conjectures that this may be one of the Orchids of the ' Challenger ' Expedition. It certainly is not in the dried collection — consisting, unfortunately, for the most part of miserable mildewed scraps. By the kindness of Rev. T. A. Preston, of Marlborough College, I lately had an opportunity of looking through two collections made at Ningpo, in China, by Mr. C. W. Everard. Below is a list of the more notew^orthy species, some of which are of special interest from being the same as Fortune's hitherto unlocalised types. A few new species gathered by Mr. Everard are scattered through the text of the present paper. Delphinium a^ithriscifoUwn, Hance. Aconitum cJmiense, Herb. Kew (an Siob. ?). The form gathered by Fortune, Forbes and Shearer, referred to by Mr. Hemsley in Journ. Bot. 1876, p. 206. Orychuphrafjmus sunchifoUus, Bge. Akebia quinata, Dne. Ilex coniuta, Ldl. 138 FURTHER NOTE ON COINOCHLAJMYS. Frcu/aria indie a, Andr. E.vocJwrda grandifiora, Ldl. Photinia jnistiilata, Ldl. Deutzia scabra, Tlibg. Bihesfasciculatum, S. &Z., var. chineme, Maxim. Loropetahnn cliinense, E.Br., yslv. Jioribiis majoribus. Bhododendron ovatiun, PI. Ophiorrhiza japonica, Bl. Senecio Old/tcniuanus, Maxim. Lactuca debilis, Btli. Symplocos decora, Hauce., var. anijmtitoUa (nob.) Androsace scLvifrcKjifolia, Bge. Lijsimacliia ferrufiinea , E dgew. Lithosjyermum japonieum, A. Gray. Buddhia Lindleyana, Fortuue. llungea Sheareri, S. Moore. Siphonostef/ia sj). nondescript (= Fortune, A. 76). M. Maxi- mowicz lias this interesting species in hand ; his specimen was gathered by Dr. Savatier at Ningpo. Behmannia (jlutinosa, Libosch. Teucriiim nepetcrf(dium, Bth. M. Maximowicz refers this to Verbenacea'. I greatly regret that there are no ripe fruits. Scutellaria indica, L., \rt. japonica. [S. japonica, Morr. & Dne.) Lawium cJnnense, Bth. A variety of this, with smaller, longer- stalked, ovate, obtuse, very coarsely crenate leaves, was found by Dr. Shearer at Kiu Iviang. F.braijnus umbcllata, Tlibg. ( 'hloranthiis Fortunel, Solms. Litsiva poh/antha, Bth. iued. {Tetrantlicra, Wall.) Aleurites cordata, Miill. Arg. Tnlipa f/raininifolia, Baker. Swilaxferox, Wall. Paris poh/phi/lla, Sm. This was also found by Dr. Shearer at Kiu Kiang. A letris japnn ica , Lamb . (Eceoclades falcata, Ldl. Cejdialantliera japonica, A. Gray. Description of 'J'ab. 100. — lllustratiiif,' Dendrohium chloropteruvi, sp. nov. a. flower (natural size); h. pollen-masses (several times maguified). FURTHER NOTE ON COIXOCHLAMYS. By S. Le M. Moore, F.L.S. A FEW months back, I had in this journal (1876, p. 321, t. 182) a short note on the above genus. On referring thither, it will be found that it differs from all other Acanthaceo' in having alternate branches and a 4-cleft stigma. Li spite of these peculiarities, for Ta:b.l96. S.Moore del. Blair, hth Dendrobium chloropterurn. /f^c/iZ?. /^ <^ S.Moore. Mntem Bros imp . FURTHER NOTE ON COINOCHLAMYS. 139 reasons to be shown below, I felt bound to follow the late Dr. Anderson and Mr. Bentham in considering it to be a peculiar Acanthacea. Quite recently, however, I have been looking over the specimens belonging to this order gathered in E. Tropical Africa by Dr. Schweinfurth, and transmitted to Kew. This collection literally teems with new species, and with species known hitherto only from the western side of the Continent, and I immediately recognised in it a Coinochlamys from Niamniam Land (Schweinfurth, Nos. 8080 and 8181), which is either a variety of C. Jdrsuta, T. And. or else a new specific form intermediate between that and C. angolana. The stamens in Schweinfurth' s plant are five in number, the filaments being of unequal length as in C. angolana, and the stigma is precisely as in that species. When Professor Oliver saw the note, he immediately drew my attention to Mostuea in LoganiacecB, which, besides being a compatriot, has the stigma, placenta, ovules, and fruit of the supposed Acanthacea. It was exceedingly unfortunate that Anderson should have described the anthers as didynamous, and that Bentham should have followed him, though owing to the scantiness of typical material it was most probably Avithout examination that this was done. By good fortune, Soyaux's specimen, the t}^3e of C. angolana, had good fruits and seeds ; but while examining the latter, so impressed was I with the alleged didynamy of the stamens, an allegation to some extent borne out by the inequality of the filaments in C. angolana, that I mistook for cotyledons what on re-examination proves to be a mass of fleshy albumen, and, failing to separate the embryo, interpreted this as the radicle. The embryo is very small relatively to the albumen, and it has a curiously long radicle, which is a character of some species of Mostuea. The ovules cannot be described as retinaculate, although a small piece of placentary tissue is seen at theu' back ; the placentas are, in fact, much as shown in Oliver's figure of Mostuea (LejJtocladus, Oliv.) in 'Proc. Linn. Soc.,' viii., t. 12, f. 3. Under these circumstances, it is plain that Coinochlamys does not belong to AcanthacecB at all, but that it agrees as to structure in so many points with Mostuea that it must be refeiTed to the immediate proximity of the latter in LoganiacecB. I am not pre- pared to decide whether the characters are of generic value ; should they be so, its autonomy will be based on the peculiar inflorescence, partite calyx, and unequal-lengthed stamens. I may mention that in fig. d of the plate accompanying the note, the placenta is drawn too near the base of the ovarian cavity, and that the albumen has a dark line running down the middle, making it look suspiciously like two cotyledons. Li Schweinfurth 's plant, some, at least, of the flowers have a small subulate bract barely 1 mm. in length, and a very minute sixth flower was present in the involucre I opened. Finally small interpetiolar stipules are to be seen, which are especially plain in C. angolana. The following emendations will have to be made in the generic diagnosis : — ' Stamina 5, medio tubo afiixa, inclusa ; filamenta parum inaequalia.' * Ovula in quoque loculo 2, collateralia, septo 140 ON DISPUTED QUESTIONS OF BOTANICAIi NOIMENCLATUKE. affixa.' * Semina 2, vel 4, plano-convexa, sericeo-iDubescentia ; albumen copiosum, carnosum ; embryo parvus, radicula elongata.' ON DISPUTED QUESTIONS OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. By John Ball, F.R.S., &c. I WISH to add a few words to the discussion which has been carried on for some time past in the pages of this journal, mainly in reply to the observations of Mr. Hiern in the number for March (pp. 72-74.) We are all agreed that the multiplication of synonyms is a serious and growing evil and inconvenience, and that it is a reproach to oiu* science that botanists should so frequently use different names when they mean the same thing. The question is, whether any rules likely to abate the mischief can be agreed upon, and if so what they should be. Those who, in the name of liberty, object to the establishment of any fixed rules for the future, must be content to see the existing confusion increased and aggravated. It is obvious that the object of any rules to be adopted must be twofold, — to help us to deal with the names already in existence, so that the same species shall for the futiu'e be known to aU botanists by the same name, and to prevent the unnecessary intro- duction of new names for plants already Imown and described. With reference to the point under discussion, it will be more convenient to discuss in the first instance the latter part of the subject. When a botanist has to deal with a i^lant which he believes to be new and unde scribed, he is forced to distmguish it from others belonging to the same genus by a new specific name. If it should turn out that the plant has been already named and described, the new name will become a superfluous synonym. Hundreds, — nay, thousands, — of such synonyms may be found in every systematic work, and it is impossible absolutely to prevent their recurrence ; but the multiplication of herbaria and of good descriptive works will render such cases more and more rare. We are aU agreed that, as a general rule, the older name is m such instances entitled to preference over the newer one, so that there is no motive to induce any one to coin without necessity a new name that is merely destined to be swept into the dust-heaj) of superfluous synonyms. The case is different wdien a systematic botanist comes to the conclusion that a sxDecies already known and described should be placed in a different genus from that in which it was ranked by the first describer, or by other preceding authors. Three diff"erent views have been maintained as to what should be done in such a case. M. Caruel holds that the writer proposing a new generic name for the plant is absolutely free to give it whatever specific designation he thinks proper. Mr. Hiern, if I understand him aright, thinks that some one amoi^g the specific names previously ON DISPUTED QUESTIONS OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. 141 applied to the plant should be selected at the option of the writer. M. A. de CandoUe and those who agree with him maintain that the specific designation given by the first describer of the plant is, as a general rule, entitled to XDreference. The best test of the ai^plicability of these views is to consider the consequences which their adoption would entail for the future. It is pretty cei*tain that different opuiions as to the limits of genera will long continue to prevail among botanists ; but it may be safely predicted that those embodied in the great work now approaching completion, the ' Genera Plantarum ' of Bentham and Hooker, will find many followers among botanists of all countries. In the numerous mstances where generic limits previously admitted have been modified in that work, the authors have in some cases indi- cated the specific name which each species, not previously admitted to the genus which they have adopted, should hereafter bear ; but more frequently they have omitted to do so. If M. Camel's views are to i^revail, there is nothing to prevent anyone having a taste in that direction from coining new names by the hundred for plants which he has never studied, nay, of which he has never even seen a specimen. Mr. Hiern's proposition, as I understand it, is more limited ; but in so far as it leaves liberty of choice among various specific names hitherto in use, it fails to secure the great deside- ratum of unanimity among botanists. One writer will prefer one specific name, another will choose a different one, — who, m the absence of a fixed rule, is to decide between them ? The rule which I advocate has at least two strong recommendations — that it will leave no room for future divergence between writers working apaiii in different countries ; and that even though they may differ as to the genus in which a given plant should be placed, the preservation of the same specific name will generally mark the identity of the species intended by both. Like most general rules, that here advocated is liable to excep- tions; easily stated, however, and free from ambiguity. 1. If the older sj)ecific name involves a statement wholly untrue and mis- leading, it loses its claim to preference, just as it would do if the plant were retained in the genus adopted by the first describer. 2. If the older specific name of a plant newly placed in a given genus has been already applied to a species of that genus, the plant must take the specific name next entitled to priority, and if there be none, must receive a new designation. 3. Where, either from the want of adequate materials, or from complete misunderstanding of its structure and affinities, a name has been given at random to a plant in a group with which it has no real relation, it cannot be said that the species has been described, and the name so given has no claim to subsequent recognition. Nearly all the objections urged to the rule, as here sought to be defined, apply not so much to the com-se which should be followed for the future to avoid creathig new synonyms, as to the somewhat different question as to how we are to deal with those already in existence. For plants retained in the genus to which they were first ascribed, the rule of preferring the older name, where this is 142 NOTES ON RUBI. not positively misleading, is now generally admitted. Yet where a name not the oldest has been generally adopted in modern works of authority, most botanists will agree that it is best to adhere to it ; while in cases where there is a difference among modern writers, the rule is strictly enforced. It often happens that the older name is not very accm-ate, or is less apx3roj)riate than a later one, but the balance of convenience is clearly seen to favour the ado^Dtion of an uniform rule. When it is proposed to refer a plant to a different genus h'om that heretofore adopted, if we are not to give the rein to individual fancy, there are but two alternative rules to guide us in selecting its future specific name. We may apply to existing names the same rule that has been above advocated as a guide for future writers, and, subject to the exceptions already mentioned, prefer the specific name given by the first describer of the species ; or we may hold that when a writer recognises the propriety of placing a plant in a given genus, he is bound to adopt the specific name first applied in conjunction with the name of that genus by a preceding writer. At first sight it would seem that it did not much matter which rule were adopted, provided either should obtain the general recognition of botanists ; but there are two weighty objections to the second alternative rule which deserve consideration. Those who hold that M. DeCandoUe's rule should serve as a guide to futm-e botanical writers, may fairly ui-ge that we deprive that rule of its chief sanction, if new names, hereafter given in defiance of it, are to have an absolute claim to recognition by subsequent writers. Further, there would remain the great inconvenience that where wi'iters differed as to the proper generic name, the same plant would appear in futiu-e under names absolutely and entirely different. To take the common case of a botanist referring to local floras and catalogues for the purpose of ascertaining the geographical distribution of a plant, and, for an instance, let this be the Arcnaria diandra of Gussone, cited by me in former paper. The same plant would appear in one list as Arenaria diandra, m another as Spergularia patens, and in a third as Lepigonum salsuyineum. The result of insisting on the preservation of the older specific name, whatever genus were adopted, would in this and other like cases spare the already over- burdened memory of the worker, and help him at once to identify the i)lant in question. In all cases, however, I think the maxim, (juieta non moccre should ai^ply, and a name sanctioned b}^ the general agreement of modern writers of authority should not be altered. NOTES ON UUBI. (No III.) By Charles C. Babington, F.E.S., &c. (Coutinued from p. 117). 8. RuBus PYGM^us, Wi'ihe. — If the specimen in Wirtgen's Herb. Rub.' (cd. 2, no. 82) is correctly named, as I can hardly NOTES ON RUBI. 143 believe, — and Focke decides that it is not, he giving it the new name of R. injgmaopsis (p. 364), — our plant bears a wrong name, although it agrees well with the figure and description in the ' Rubi Germ.' I am inclined to think that we are right, and Wirtgen is wrong. Focke does not seem to be acquainted with Weihe's plant. My specimens from Tonbridge Wells appear to agree exactly with the it. x^raruptorum of Boulay ('Eonces des Vosges,' p. 97, s^d. 78.) 9. R. KoEHLERi, Weihe. — The specimen so named in the "Set" agrees with others similarly named by Mr. Bloxam, all of which I believe are R. pallidiis, Weihe. Genevier thinks that our Pi. pallidus is closely allied to Pi. miitahilis, which will be noticed presently ; but, judging from a specimen received from him, I see no cause for giving up the view expressed in my ' Rubi ' that R. miitahilis is very near to our R. scaber ; and, indeed, the specimen named R. p)Midiis by Genevier for Baker is our R. p)alliclus, and not, I think, m any way allied to R. mutabilis. 10. R. KoEHLERi, /3. iNFESTus, Bcih. — In 1867 I received from Mr. Baker a very spinous bramble, gathered at St. Ann's Hill, SmTey, which the ticket states Mr. Bloxam called R. foliosus, and M. Genevier R. melanoxijlon. It seems to me to be very far too rough a plant for the former, and appears to be a form of R. Koehleri ; nor can I detect its relationship to R. melanoxylon, of which there are two specimens in Wirtgen' s ' Herb. Ruborum.' Probably M. Genevier has been deceived by imperfect specimens. The specimens in the " Set " may be the plant of Wirtgen, but the many short setffi on the stem seem to show its relationship to plants like R. Hystrix, and near it accordingly I have placed the specimen in questions. Genevier places the true R. melanoxylon amongst plants some of which seem to belong to our Koehleriani and others to the Bellardiani. Wu'tgen considers his plant to range with the Spectahiles, and the analytical table given by Genevier shows how close its characters, w^hen thus tabulated (although that, of course, has not much weight), bring it to R. mucronulatiis, near which it x^robably should be placed. 11. R. oBLiQuus, Blox. — I possess a good series of this plant kindly given to me by Mr. Briggs in 1870, and gathered near Plymouth. They appear to me not to be the R. ohliquus, Whtg., of which I have authentic specimens (' Herb. Rub.,' ed. 1, 98; ed. 2, 102.) Mr. Briggs had Bloxam' s authority for the name; they therefore are the Pi. ohliquus, Blox., as described in the ' Journ. of Bot.,' (viii., 69.) I agree with Mr. Briggs in the opinion (/ J. of B.,' ix., 368) that R. ohliquus, Blox., is very nearly allied to, if not identical with, R. mutahilis, Genev., of which I possess an authentic specimen. I also now do not consider it to be so nearly allied to R. scaher as I formerly did (' Rubi,' 187), but, as suggested by Mr. Briggs, probably a distinct species belonging to the Koehleriani rather than the Radula:. If such is its true position, it may perhaps be i^laced between R. dirersifolius and R. Lejeunii. It is manifestly considered to be allied to the latter by M. Genevier, for 144 NOTES ON RUBI. he x'laces ouly one sj)ecies, B. Lejeunii, Bor. = E. ])UntJiosti/lus, Genev., between R. mutahilis, Grenev., and U. Lejeunii, W. & N. It is true that he removes li. dirersifolim, Lindl., far away from them, considering it to be one of the Ccesii. In this view of R. (livemfolim I cannot agree with him, although Mr. Baker manifestly does so. Dr. Focke also j)laces a part of my R. diversi- foHns (that form figured in this journal, viii., t. 107) amongst the CcBsii, under the name of R. myriacanthus, Focke. As that name was only published in 1871, and Lmdley's R. diversifolius in 1835, Focke manifestly considers the typical form of Lmdley's i>lant as distinct, although I do not find any notice of it in his book. My opmion is that R. diversifoUiis and R. Lejeunii are more coiTectly placed in the group Koehleriani. R. mutabilis difiers from 7?. diversifolius by having traces of glaucous bloom on the barren stem, an obovate-acuminate terminal leaflet, stalked and not imbricate basal leaflets, a long pyramidal panicle with much longer axillary subcorymbose branches and unequal setae. From R. Lejeunii, by the bloom on the much more prickly stem, on which the prickles are more unequal and the aciculi not so distinct from them, the leaves rugose above and very much more liauy or even felted beneath. The panicle is narrower, its axillary branches somewdiat compound, the branch and its branchlets being nearly corymbose, its prickles very strong and much more abundant, and springing from long, narrow, com- pressed bases. Also, Mr. Briggs states that Imear, but sometimes slightly leaf-lilve, ^Doints to the sej^als may be found. Folio whig the i^lan adopted in my 'Manual,' I should thus characterise the plant, and place it between my R. diversifolius and R. Lejeunii : — R. Dnitahilis, Genev.; stem arcuate-prostrate angular sparingly pilose and setose, prickles moderate unequal sub-patent from a long compressed base, aciculi strong very unequal mostly short, leaflets rugose above doubly and mostly lobate-dentate very densely haky or felted beneath, terminal leaflet obovate-acunmiate, basal leaflets stalked, not imbricate ; imnicle long narrou -pyramidal leafy nearly to the top its branches and branchlets subcorymbose subpatent, its rachis rery pricJdy aciculate and setose its prickles very strong from large compressed bases numerous, sepals ovate felted setose reflexed with rather leaf-like points. — R. obliquus, Blox., not Wirtg. — Stem often with glaucous bloom. "Petals greenish- white. Filaments white. Styles greenish." — Abundant near Plymouth. 12. R. cAVATiFOLius, Miill. — The Rev. Augustin Ley has sent me a very interesting bramble found near Trellech, Monmouthshire, in August, 1876, which is very near R. pallidus, but probably is the R. caratifoUus, Miill., as published in Boulay's ' Ronces Vos- giennes,' pp. 67 and 132, sp. 49.) It agrees very well with the Abbe Boulay's description, and my specimen is exceedingly like those from France. R. cavatifolius is not noticed by Focke in his SHORT NOTES. 145 ' Syuoi)sis.' Compared with B. jjallidus, its stem is so armed as to seem sub-glabrous^ its leaflets are not felted beneath, and differ much m shape, the terminal one being very much rounder and more cordate ; the iDanicle more abrupt, x)artly on account of the shortness of the terminal peduncle. I know nothing about the colour of the floral organs or the shape of the petals. It seems to be another well-marked form of li. Koehleri, which may perhaps be characterised as follows : — 11. cavatifolms, Miill. ; stem arcuate-prostrate angular furrowed suhfjlahrous, prickles many very unequal declming from a compressed base, aciculi and setae very short rather unequal, hairs very few, leaves quinate, leaflets unequally and rather doubly but finely dentate-serrate even above pale green and hairy on the veins beneath, terminal leaflet cordate cuspidate-attenuate {excluding the lomj point they are scarcely lonyer than broad), basal leaflets not imbricate stalked, panicle oblong truncate, leafy below its terminal jDedimcle much shorter than the lateral ones, axillary branches subracemose its prickles long slender its aciculi setae and hah's many, sepals ovate-attenuate reflexed. Unfortunately I have only seen a single specimen of this plant. ( To he continued, i SHORT NOTES. EiCKLERiA, Hartog (see p. 72.) — As I find that Eichleria is already preoccupied, my genus of that name must be altered, and I name, it Muriea, after Dr. James Murie, F.L.S., &c., Assistant- Secretary to the Linnean Society. I have carefully examined Cryptogyne, Hook, f., and find it to possess the floral symmetry of Chrysophyllum oliviforme, with the addition of five scales in fi'ont of the stamens. These do not influence the position of the carpels, and though described doubtfully as staminodes by Sir Jos. Hooker, are certainly mere emergences from the "corolla-tube." — M. M. Hartog. Notices of Boolts ana ilTtmo(rs. NEW GENERA AND SPECIES OF PHANEROGAMOUS PLANTS PUBLISHED IN PERIODICALS IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE YEAR 1877. This Hst comprehends the new genera and species of Flowering Plants published, during 1877, in the following periodicals : — 'Botanical Magazine,' ' Gardeners' Chronicle,' 'Icones Plantarum,' 146 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIES. 'Journal of Botany,' and 'Transactions 'and 'Journal of the Linnean Society of London.' Of the ' Icones Plantarum,' the first part of vol. iii. of the new series, containing plates 1201-1225, was published on June 1st, and the second part, with plates 1226-1250, on December 1st. As these dates are given merely on the temporary paper covers, which are usually destroyed, it is well to record them here. Part 4 of vol. i. of the new series of the Linnean Society's 'Transactions,' bears the printed date, "December, 1876," but was not published till January, 1877 ; and the new species contained in it are therefore included in this catalogue. Dr. I. B. Balfour's Rodriguez novelties were published in the Linnean Society's ' Journal ' on May 31st, thus ante-dating by fully two months Mr. Baker's ' Flora of Mauritius,' although, from the manner in which this latter work is referred to by Dr. Balfour, it would be naturally inferred to have been previously published. There are several other species considered new, but to which no specific appellations have been given, in the first part of Mr. Ball's Spicilegium Florae Maroccan^ (' Journ. Linn. Soc.,' xvi., pp. '281-376). Also, in Mr. Baker's Systema Lidacearum ('Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., pp. 61-180) are a good many names without descriptions,* which are consequently omitted in the following list. Abrotanella rhyncocarpa, Bcdf. f. (Composite). — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 16.) Acer Van-Volxemii, Mast. (Sapindaceae). — Caucasus. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 72.) ^chmea VEiTcmi, Baker (Bromeliacese). — New Grenada. (Bot. Mag., t. 6329.) ^OLANTHUS zanzibaricus, S. Moove. — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 68.) uErua coNGESTA, Balf . f . (AmaranthacesB.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 20.) Agave carib^a, Hart. Ken-. (Amaryllide^.) — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 683.) A. CoRDEEOYi, Hort. Peacock. — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 398 and fig. 79.) A. REGiA, Hurt. Saunders. — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 620 and fig. 124.) A. Salmdyckh, Baker. — Mexico. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 490.) A. viRiDissmA, Hort. Peacock. — Mexico? (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 137.) Aglaia pirifera, Hance (Rutacea?.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 331.) A. PYRAJMiDATA, Haiice. — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 331.) * These have bince been given in the ' Transactions of the Linneau Society' (ser. 2, vol. i., pp. 209-273), and will be therefore included in our next annual enumeration. NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIES. 147 Alloplectus peltatus, Oliver (Gesneraceae.) — Costa Kica. (Bot. Mag., t. 6333.) Aloe chloroleuca, Baker (Liliaceae.) — Cape. (Gard. Cliron., ii., p. 38.) A. platylepis, Baker. — Cape. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 38.) A. TOMATOPHYLLOiDEs, Balf. f. — BodiiguBz. (Joum. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 22.) A. TRICOLOR, Baker. — Cape Colony. (Bot. Mag., t. 6324.) Alstrcemeria Burchellh, Baker (Amaryllideae.) — Brazil. (Jouru. Bot., p. 262.) A. Gardneri, Bake?-, — Brazil. (Joum. Bot., p. 261.) A. PLATYPHYLLA, Baker. — Brazil. (Joum. Bot., p. 261.) A. scaberula. Baker. — Brazil. (Joiirn. Bot., p. 261.) A. zAMioiDEs, Baker. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., j). 262.) Amomophyllum Patinh, Engler (Aroidese.) — N. Grenada. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 139.) Ancrumia, Haw. MSS. (Liliacese.) A. cuspidata, Haw. — Chili. (Ic. Plant., t. 1227.) Ancylanthus Monteiroi, Oliv. (Eubiaceae.) — Delagoa Bay. (Ic. Plant., t. 1208.) Anthericum oorymbosum, Baker (Liliaceae.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 71.) A. iNcoNSPicuuM, Baker. — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 71.) Anthurium spathiphyllum, X E. Br. (AroidesB.) — Locality unknown. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 652.) Astrocaryum minus. Trail (Palmse.) — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 78.) Bactris elegans, Trail (Palmae.) — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 3, tab. 184, fig. 1.) B. eumorpha. Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 9, tab. 184, fig. 4.) B. INCOMMODA, Trail. — Brazil. (Jom*n. Bot., p. 43.) B. juruensis, Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 40.) B. MARAJA, Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 43.) B. oligocarpa. Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 46.) B. PiNANGA, Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 41.) B. SPH^ROCARPA, Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 8, tab. 184, fig. 3.) B. syagroides. Trail. — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 76.) Balfourodendron, Mello (Rutaceae, Toddalieae.) B. eburneicm, Mello.— Brazil. (Ic Plant., t. 1204.) Barleria Hildebrandth, S. Moore (Acanthaceae.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 69.) Blepharis pratensis, S. Moore (Acanthace^.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 294.) Boerhaavia Schomburgkiana, OHv. (Nyctagineae ) — S. Australia. (Ic. Plant., t. 1225.) BoMAREA oligantha, Baker (Amaryllideffi.) — Peru. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 648.) BoswELLiA neglecta, S. Moore (Burseraceae.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 67, tab. 185.) Bridelia insulana, Hance (Euphorbiaceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 337.) 148 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. BucHANANiA RETICULATA, Hauce (Aiiacardiacefe.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 332.) Calliphrukia subedentata, Baker (Amaryllidaceje.) — New Grenada. (Bot. Mag., t. 6289.) Calorhabdos cauloptera, Hance (Scropliulariaceae). — China. (Jouni. Bot., p. 298.) Cardiostigma, Baker (Iridese) = (Telas'ine longispatlia, Herb. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 102.) Catopheria spicata, Benth. (Labiat.^e.) — New Grenada. (Ic. Plant., t. 1215.) Ceropegia Barklyi, Hook./. (Asclepiadeae.) — S. Africa. (Bot. Mag., t. 6315.) Chironia exigua, (Jlir. (Gentianace£e.) — S. Africa. (Ic. Plant., t. 1229.) CiNNAMOMUM sERicANs, Hcince (LauraceaB.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 336.) Clathrospermum biovulatum, S. Moore (Anonacese.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 65.) Cleisostoma \^rginale, Hance. — Hongkong. (Journ. Bot., p. 88.) Cleistanthus tomentosus, Hance (Eupliorbiaceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 337.). Clerodendron laciniatum, Balf. /. (Verbenacese.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 19.) CcELOGYNE Meyeriana, Rclih. f. (Orchideae.) — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 134.) Comanthosphace, S. Moore (Labiatae.) — Japan. (Journ. Bot., p. 293.) CoFFEA Afzelii, Hiem. (Rubiace^e.) — Sierra Leone. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 174.) C. BREViPEs, Hiem. — Cameroons. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 172.) C. HYPOGLAUCA, Wcliv. — Aiigola. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 173.) C. JASMINOIDES, Welw. — W. Trop. Africa. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 175.) C. LiBERicA, ''Hurt. Bull,'' Hiem. — W. Trop. Africa. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 171, tab. 24.) C. melanocarpa, Wehc. — Angola. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 173.) C. rupestris, Hiem. — W. Trop. Africa. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 174.) C. subcordata, Hiem. — Old Calabar. (Trans. Linn. Soc, ser. 2, i., p. 174.) Cypripedium albo-purpureum, Fichh. f. (Orchidece.) (Hybrid C. Donheyanum X Schlimii.) (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 38.) C. BoxALLi, iiWj/>./.— Trop^ Asia. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 367.) C. Haynaldianum, Fichh. f. — Philippine Islands. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 272 ; Bot. Mag., t. 6296.) C. lucidum, Fahb. f. (hybrid C. rillosuw X Fou-ii.) (Gard, Cliron.. ii., p. 521.) NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 149 C. PATENS, Pichh. f. (hybrid C. harhatum x Hookerm.) (Gard. Cliron., ii., p. 456.) Dacrydium Westlandicum, T. Kirk (Goniferse.) — New Zealand. (Ic. Plant., t. 1219.) Danais corymbosa, Balf. /. (Rubiace^e.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 13.) Decaspermum sEnic-Ev^i,!! mice (Mj^rtaceae.) — Cambodia. (Join-n. Bot., p. 334.) Dendrobium ak\chnostachyum, 7^(7<6./'. (Orcliideae.) — Not local- ised. (Gard. Cliron. i., p. 334.) D. dactylodes, Reichenh.f. — Samoa. (Journ Bot., id. 132.) D. Petri, Rchh. f. — Polynesia. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 107.) D. PR.ECINCTUM, liclih. f. — India. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 750.) D. Stricklandianum, lichb. f. — Japan. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 749.) [ D. tipuliferum, Rchh.f. — Viti. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 72.) Drac.i:na schizantha, Baker (Liliacese.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 71.) Dyckia frigida. Hook f. (Bromeliacese.) — Brazil. (Bot. Mag., t. 6294.) El^is odora, Trail. (Palmse.) — Brazil. (Journ. Bot., p. 81.) El^ocarpus argyrodes, Hance (Tiliaceffi.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 380.) Epicharis Juglans, Hance (Meliaceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 330.) Epidendrum Coxianum, Fichh. f. (Orchidese.) — Trop. Amer. (Gard. Chron., u., p. 358.) Eria Carolett.e, Hance (OrchidesB.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 337.) Et^ria Whitmeei, Reichenb.f. — Samoa. (Journ. Bot., p. 133.) Eugenia Balfourii, Baker (Myrtaceae.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 13.) ExocARYA, Benth. (Cyperaceae) ; E. scleroides, Benth. — N. S. Wales. (Ic. Plant., t. 1206.) Euphorbia daphnoides, Balf. f. (Euphorbiacese.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 21.) Ficus NoRONH^, (ilir. (Artocarpeae.) — Fernando Noronha. (Ic. Plant, t. 1222.) FiMBRisTYLis PYCNOSTACHYA, Hance (CyporaceaB.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 338.) Galactia argentifolia, S. Moore (Leguminosae.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 291.) Gasteria colubrina, .Y. E. Br. (Liliacese.) — Cape. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 38.) Globba Schomburgkii, Hook f. (Zingiberace^e.) — Siam. (Bot. Mag., t. 6298.) Gongora grossa, Rchh., f. (Orchideae.) — Equador. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 781.) Grammatophyllum KiEMPLERiANUM, Rchb. f. (OrcliidefB.) — Mada- gascar. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 240.) 150 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Grewia ectasicarpa, S. Moore (Sterculiaceae.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 67.) Heptapleurum schizophyllum, Hance (Araliaceffi.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 834.) Hesperantha longituba, Baker (Ii'idese.) — Cape. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 652.) Hesperoxiphion, Baker (Irideag) = Ferraria pusilla, Link & Otto, and Cypella peruviana, Baker. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 127.) Heterachne, Benth. (Graminese) ; H. GuUiveri, Bentli. (Ic. Plant., t. 1250.) Homalonema peltata, Mast. (Aroidese.) — Columbia. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 273, and fig. 46.) HoPEA dealbata, Hance (Dipterocarpe?e.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 329.) HuERNiA BREviRosTRis, N. E. Br. (AsclepiadeaB.) — Cape. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 780, fig. 124.) Hypoestes inconspicua, Balf. f. (Acanthacese.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 18.) H. RODRiQUESiANA, Balf. f. — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 18.) Hypoxis Arnottii, Baker (Hypoxidace^.) — Cape. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 552.) IsoGLossA BARLERioiDES, S. Moore (AcanthacesB.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 70.) Iris Kashmiriana, Baker (Lrideae.) — Kashmir. (Gard. Cliron., ii., p. 744.) I. Rossii, Baker. — N. China. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 809.) Klattia, Baker (Iridese) = Witsenia partita, Ker. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 110.) L^LiA CALOGLOSSA, Pichh. f. fOrchidese) (hybrid Cattleya lahiata x Lo'Iia crispa, or Boothiana.) (Gard. Chron., i., p. 202.) L. Sedeni, Echb. f. (hybrid Cattleya violacea x Lalia devoniana. (Gard. Chron., ii., p! 424.) Lamprothaimnus, Hiern (Rubiacese) ; L. zanzuebariciis, Hiern. —Zanzibar. (Ic. Plant., t. 1220.) Landolphia capensis, Olir. (Apocynacefe.) — Transvaal, S. Africa. (Ic. Plant., t. 1228.) Linociera cambodiana, Hance (Oleaceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 335.) Lobelia vagans, Balf. f. (Campanulaceae.) — Rodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 16.) Lysimachia Fcenum-gr^cum, Hance (Primulaceae.) — China. (Journ. Bot., p. 355.) L. Alfredi, Hance. — -China. (Journ. Bot., p. 366.) Maba samoensis, Hiern (EbenaceaD.) — Samoa. (Journ. Bot., p. 99, tab. 186.) Masdevallia lata, Echb. f. (OrchidesB.) — Central America. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 653.) M. Lehmanni, Echb. f. — Equador. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 88.) NOTICES OF BOOKS AND IMEilOIRS. 151 M, EADiosA, lichb.f. — N. Grenada. (Gard. Clirou., i., p. 684.) M. TrnGi^ocTim,. Rchb. f. — Equador. (Gard. Cliron., ii.,p. 648.) M. XANTHODACTYLA, Hchb. f. — Ti'op. Anier. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 552.) Melodorum clavipes, Hance (Aiionacese.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 328.) Memecylon Pierrei, Hance (Melastomaceae.) — Cambodia. (Joiu-n. Bot., p. 334.) Mesembryanthemum Cooperi, Hook. f. (Ficoidete.) — S. Africa. (Bot. Mag., t. 6312.) M. SuTHEELANDii, Hook f. — Natal. (Bot. Mag., t. 6299.) MicRosTYLis JosEPHiANA, Reicheub. f. — Sikkim Himalaya. (Bot. Mag., t. 6325.) MiTRASACME SETOSA (Loganiacese.) — Cambodia. (Jom-n. Bot., p. 335.) MoNTBRETiA PoTTsii, Bake)' (Iiidefe.) — Cape. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 424.) Nesogenes decumbens, Balf. f. (Verbenaceae.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 19.) Oncinotis hirta, Olio. (Apocynacege.) — W. Trop. Africa. (Ic. Plant., t. 1232.) OpmoRRmzA FucosA, Hance (Eubiacese.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 334.) Oemocarpum Kirkii, S, Moore (Leguminosae.) — E. Trop. Africa. (Journ. Bot., p. 291.) 0. MiMosoiDEs, S. Moore. — E. Trop. Africa. (Journ. Bot., p. 291.) OxALis NoRONHJE, OHv. (GeramacesB.) — Fernando Noronha. (Ic. Plant., t. 1226.) Pandanus heterocaepus, Balf. f. (Pandanace^e.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 22.) P. TENuiFOLius. — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi.. p. 22.) Parinarium ana:mense, Hance (Eosace®.) — Cochin China. (Journ. Bot., p. 333.) Pedicularis gloriosa, Biss. d- S. Moore (Scrophulariacea9.) — Japan. (Journ. Bot., p. 295.) Pentas parvifolia, Hiern. (Eubiaceae.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 262, tab. 7.) Peperomia hirta, Balf. /. (Piperaceae.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 20.) P. RETICULATA, Bolf. f. — Eodi'iguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 21.) P. RODRiGUEsiANA, Balf. fil. — Eodiiguez. (Joum. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 21.) Peplonia amazonica, Benth. (Asclepiadeae.) — Brazil. (Ic. Plant., t. 1234.) Pescatorea Backhousiana, Rchb. f. (Orchidese.) — Equador ? (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 456.) Ph.t:dranassa ^^RIDIFL0RA, Baker (Amaryllidese.) — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 134.) 152 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Phal.enopsis Stobartiana, Echb. f. (Orchideae.) — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Cliron., ii., p. 392.) Phragmites macer, Munro (Graminefe.) — JaiDan. (Jourii. Bot., p. 350.) PiERREA, Hance (Samydacese) ; P. dictijoneura, Haiice. — Cam- bodia. (Jourii. Bot. p. 339.) PiLEA Balfourii, Bakev (Urticace^.) — Eodiiguez. (Journ. Limi. Soc, xvi., p. 20.) Pisonia viscosa, Balf. f. (Nyctagineae.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Limi. Soc, xvi., ]). 19.) Pithecolobium zanzibaricum, S. Moore (Legumiiiosae.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 292.) Plagiosetum, BentJi. [Gi-iim.me?e) = Pennisetum refractiim, F. MuelL— (Ic. Plant., iii., p. 33.) PsiADiA rodriguesiana, Bcilf. f. (Compositse.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 15.) PsYCHOTRiA ? lanceolata, Bcilf. f. (EubiacGaB.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 15.) Pterospermum Pierrei, Hance (Sterculiaceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 329.) ~ Pyrostria trilocularis, Balf. f. (Eubiacese.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 14.) Quivisia laciniata, Balf. f. (Meliacese.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 12.) Eandia heterophylla, Balf.f. (Eubiaceae.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 14.) Eeaumuria Floyeri, S. Moore (Tamariscineae.) — Persia. (Journ. Bot., p. 289.) EmpsALis PENDULiFLORA, .V. E. i)/*. (CactacesB.) — Trop. America. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 716.) Ehododendron quinquefolium, Biss. d' S. Moore (Ericaceae.) — Japan. (Journ. Bot., p. 292.) EoNDELETiA Backhousii, Hook. f. (EubiacesB.) — Trop. America. (Bot. Mag., t. 6290.) Sarcostemma odontolepis, Balf. f. (Asclepiadeae.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 17.) ScLERocARYA CASTANEA, Baker (Aiiacardiaceae.) — Eodriguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 12.) ScYPHocHLAMYs, Balf. f. (Eubiaceas) ; S. revoluta, Balf. f. — Eodi-iguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 14.) Sebjea oldenlandioides, S. Moore (Gentianaceae.) — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 68.) Sempervirum Greenii, Baker (Crassulacete.) — Locality doubtful. (Gard. Cliron., ii., p. 230.) Senecio Cheesemani, Hook. f. (Compositae.) — New Zealand. (Ic. Plant., t. 1201.) Sericocoma pallida, -S'. Moore (Amarantliaceae.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 70.) S. soMALENsis, S. Moore. — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 70.) Sobralia Cattleya, Fi.chh. f. (Orchideae.) — N. Grenada. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 72.) NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 153 SoLANUM ACANTHODEs, Houk. f. (Solaiiacea^.) — Brazil ? (Bot. Mag., t. 6283.) Spathoglottis Petri, Fuhb. f. (Orcliidefe.) — Polynesia. (Gard. Chron., ii., p. 392.) Sphenostigma, Baker (Irideae) = Alnphia SeUoiviana, Klatt. (Joiu'ii. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 124.) Sphinctacanthus Griffithii, Benth. ( Acautliaceae.) — Bengal. (Ic. Plant., t. 1205.) Sportella, Hance (Eosaceae) ; S. atalantoides, Hance. — China. (Journ. Bot., p. 207.) Stanhopea pulla, Pichb. f. (Orchideae.) — Costa Eica. (Gard. Clu-on., i., p. 810.) Stapelia patentirostris, X. E. Br. (Asclepiadese.) — Cape. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 140, and fig. 21.) S. Bayfieldi, X.E. Br. — Cape. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 431, and fig. 66. S. unguipetala, X E. Br. — Cape. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 334, and fig. 54.) Stipa pekinensis, Hance (Gramineae.) — China. (Journ. Bot., p. 268.) Strobilanthes formosana, S. Moore (Acanthaceae.) — Formosa. (Joimi. Bot., p. 294.) Tanulepis, Balf. /. (Asclepiadeae) ; T. sphenop/njlla, Balf. f. — Eodi-iguez. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 17.) Telipogon crcesus, Ft,chb. f. (OrchideEe.) — N. Grenada. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 172.) Terminalia Papilio, Hance (Combretace«.) — Cambodia . (Journ. Bot., p. 333.) Tetranthera macrocalyx, Hance (Lauraceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 336.) Thorelia, Hance (Lvthraceae) ; T. deqlupta, Hance. — Siam. (Jom-n. Bot., p. 268.) Thrixspermum Freemanni, Rchb.f. (OrchideaB.) — Assam. (Gard. Chron., i., p. 750.) Tinnea heterotypica, S. Moore (Labiatae.) — Somali-land. ( Journ. Bot., p. 69.) Trichlora, 5rt/c^r (Liliaceas) ; T. pieruriana, Baker. — Peru. (Ic Plant., t. 1237.) Trichoderma heliocharis, 8. Moore (Boragineae.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. 68.) Trichostachys vaginalis, Hiern (Eubiaceffi.) — W. Trop. Africa. (Journ. Linn. Soc, xvi., p. 263, tab. 8.) Tristillateia africana, S. Moore (Malpighiacese.) — Zanbibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 290.) Triumfetta actinocarpa, S. Moore (Tiliace^.) — Somali-land. (Journ. Bot., p. Q^Q.) T. grandidens, Hance. — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 329.) Unona \^LUTiNA, iIa?irtMAnonaceae.) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 328.) UvARiA AsTERiAS, -S'. Moore (Anonacete.j — Zanzibar. (Journ. Bot., p. 289.) X 154 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. ViLLARsiA cAMBODiANA, Hauce {GreutiauaceaB. ) — Cambodia. (Journ. Bot., p. 335.) Xylopia Pierrei, Hance (Auonacese.) — Cambodia. (Jourii. Bot., p. 328.) Zanthoxylon paniculatum, Balf. f. (Kutacese.) — Rodriguez. (Jourii. Liiiu. Soc, xvi., p. 12.) Zygopetalum Clayii, Bchh. f. (hybrid Z. maxillare x crinitum.) (Gard. Cliron., i., p. 684.) Troisieme Memoire siir les Mucorinees. Par M. Ph. Van Tieghem. (Ann. des Sc. Nat., Ser. vi., tome iv., p. 312). This tliii'd memoir is prefixed by some general observations on classification from the author's now well-known x^oint of view, and by a study of some general questions bearing on the special group the knowledge of which he has done so much to advance. This study is at first concerned with the mutilation and fragmentation of reproductive cells. To deal with this, zygosj^ores of Spoyodinia (irandis and of Sjnnellus fusi(/er were chosen on the one hand, and asexual spores of Piloholiis (Edipm, Phycomijces nitens, and Mortierella reticulata on the other. A preliminary necessary condition was found to be that the body to be mutilated must be proximately homogeneous ; so that with zygospores the experimentation must occur either before perfect maturity, or after commencement of germination when the oil has disappeared : a second condition is that the fragment be not too small. The X)rocess was thus conducted : — Buddings from a zygospore, germinating in a humid atmosphere, were cut off as they appeared ; after a time the contents of the zygos^jore divided into a number of spores, separated by interstitial matter : the same result was obtained by similar treatment of an asexual spore ; and if Schizo- mycetous organisms were admitted into the culture-fluid, these endospores were produced without scission of buds. The author then passes on to consider the cause which favours formation of zygospores, which he continues to find m the air being impoverished of oxygen. After this he details the dift'erences in the germination, in different media, of spores and zygospores ; and then he treats at length of the structure and mode of de- hiscence of the sporange in Pilobolus and Pllaira. Then follows the systematic portion, in which are described three new species of Piloholus; a new genus (Absidia) with four species; two new specific forms referred to Phizopus ; a new Helicostijlum, with relegation of Circinella (jlomerata, of the first memoir, to this genus ; a Thamni- dium; three new sj)ecies of Mortierella, and the same number belonging to SyncepJialis. The new genus Ahsidia has, roughly si)eaking, the asexual growth of Pihizopus and the sexual growth of Plnjcomijces. From the former it differs chiefly in that the sporangiferous stolons have a parabolic form and are cuticularised throughout ; that the spo- rangia alteriiate with the rootlets instead of being superposed to NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 155 them ; that the form of the cohimella is conical and slender (not globular), and that this organ has a different history subsequent to escape of the spores ; that the membrane of the sjDores is not cuticularised and coloured ; and that the zygospores have a Phyco- myces-^iQ mvestment. The author finds that if a spore is ke^Dt in a nutritive medium it produces a mycelium ; placed in a moist atmosphere, after havuig attained a certain size under proper nutrimental conditions, it gives origin directly to a sporange, without forming any mycelium. The zygospore behaves in a similar maner : these organs may sometimes, it was observed, be borne on the parabolic stolons. Asexual spores, similar to the zygospores, are sometimes pro- duced by a parthenogenetic process ; these the author terms a zygo- spores. The curving of the stolons is held to result from the contiguity of a foreign body, this tendency being distinguished as positive somatropism. Below is the author's tribual arrangement of the group. Mucorinem. /heterogeneous, i. e. formed of No stylospores. A colu- an upper cuticularised hood mella in the sporange,^ and a lower diffluent zone. Pilobolecs. the membrane of which \ homogeneous, either all en- is I tirely persistent or all dif- ^ fluent MucorecB. Stylospores present. No f spherical and isolated . . . Mortierellece. columella in the spo- -j cylindric and grouped in ca- range, which is ... i pitula Syncephalidece. S. M. Die Pilze des Wdnstockes. G. Felix von Thumen. Vienna, 1878. (pp. 225, with 5 plates). This monograph of the Fungi of the Vine is a work of interest not only to the scientific botanist, but also, though perhaps in a lesser degree, to all our cultivators. It contains an enumeration of some two hundred and twenty species of Fungi which occur upon the Vine, its leaves, fruit, stems, branches and roots, in various parts of the world. It treats of the Fungi found upon the following nine species of Vitis, viz. : V. vinifera, L. (150) ; F. La- hrusca, L. (54) ; V. mtivalis, Mchx. (13) ; F. vulpina, L. (7) ; F. riparia, Mchx. (3) ; F. cordifolia, Mchx. (8) ; F. rotundifolia, Mchx. (2) ; F. candicans, Engelm. (1) ; V. syJcestris, Gmel. (2). Of the nineteen Fungi affecting the Grape itself, Oidium Tuckeri is of course the most important in a practical point of view. Baron Thiimen appears to follow Fuckel in regarding it as the conidial form of Spharotheca castcajnei, Lev., and therefore distinct from the American Erysijjhe nectator, Schw., which species does not seem to have been recorded since Schweinitz's time ; while it is classed by Dr. Cooke, in ' The Erysiphei of the United States,' with the " species dubiae." The author also considers it unconnected with 156 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. a variety of rnri)nila spiralis, B. & C, that occurs sometimes upon the Grape iu the United States. Amongst the great number of Fungi upon the living and dead Vine-stems and brandies are many new species. The Sphm-ia are designated by their new generic ai^pellations — Cn/ptoralm, Botrt/o- spharia, Bertia, TeicJiOspora, AnthostomeJla, liehentiovliia, Valsaria, &c., names much more famihar to continental botanists than to us in this country, who are somewhat slow in appreciating the advantages of this system of nomenclature. Of the hymenomycetous Fungi twenty-two s^Decies are men- tioned, mostly on the dead stems, including a small Agaric from the Cape of Good Hope, Ag. proteus, Kalchbr., allied to A(j. varia- bilis, P. Of the Fungi on living Vine-leaves one of the most interesting is a new species of IJredo, U. Vitis, Thm., which, like Peronospora Vitis, is of Transatlantic origin. The difference between the American and European Vine-flora is very striking ; so many Fungi occur in America that have not been met with in Euro]De, where Vines form such an important industry and mycologists are so much more numerous. Manj^ of the old species of Schweinitz have never been met with here. A figure is given of the curious mould which grows parasitically upon Oidium Tiickeri, the Cicimwbolu.s Cesatii of De Bary, a plant apparently common enough on the Continent, but as yet un- observed in Great Britain. Baron von Thiimen is to be congratulated upon the exhaustive manner in which he has compiled this monograph, which is accompanied by lithographic plates illustrating the structure and fructification of the more important species, whereb}^ the value of the book as a work of reference to the student is materially enhanced. Charles B. Plowright. On the Homologies of the Siispensor. By S. H. Vines. (' Quarterly Journal of Microsc. Science,' 1878, p. 58.) The author concludes "that the seta and foot of Mosses and Liverworts, the foot of the vascular Cryptogams (excluding EquisetacecB so far), the suspensor of SelagineUa, of Gymno- sperms, and of Angiosperms, are derived from that cell, produced by the division of the oospore, to which, for the sake of clearness, the name of Embryophore has been given. These organs may, therefore, be regarded as truly homologous, and this view is not invalidated by the fact that the suspensor or the foot is developed, in some cases from the whole of the Embryophore, in others from a part of it. This fact merely renders the homology incomplete in certain cases." The term ' Embryophore ' is applied to the cell which gives origin to the tissue maintaining temporary connection between the embryo and neighbouring structures, that of ' em- bryonic cell' to the special cell of embryo-formation, — a convenient piece of nomenclature. The Embryophore, we would observe, is not always produced by a process which, even in its widest sense, NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIKS. 157 can be called one of cell- division, as in Ephedra. The i3aper is evidently inspired by Kienitz-Gerloff's in ' Botanische Zeitung,' November, 1876. S. M. Deuxienie Xote sur les Moiivements spontanes et ref/idiers dii Cerato- phyllum demersum. Par E. Eodiee. The author has continued his examination of the movements of Ceratophyllum (see Journ. Bot., 1877, p. 248), by the observation of the torsion which accompanies the flexion of the distal mternodes. In general, when examined at about six in the morning, a move- ment of torsion from left to right is proceeding; this then stops, and gives place to a movement from right to left, which continues up to about 11 a.m., that is, for about five hours ; the experiments showed a mean of about 36° per hour, i.e., of 180° or half the cir- cumference during the whole time. The reverse torsion from left to right commences immediately the former ceases, and goes on at the rate of about 12° an hour, — one-third that of the morning ; estimating its duration at 1^ hours, its amount is 90°, or one-half that of the morning. Tables are given of these results, and show that there is by no means complete regularity in the movements. M. Eodier's observations were stopped in November by the plant passing into its winter state, in which its movements are almost entirely suspended. The elongation of the terminal buds ceases, the last verticils of leaves remain closely imbricated, and the latter become stiffly curved, thicker, and larger, with the air- cavities swollen and full of gas. At the same time the axis becomes thickened and pmk, and its cells are found to be crowded with starch and rounded. In short, we have here produced wdnter buds by w^hich the plant is propagated. They are very easily detached from the old stems, and then readily float, and are carried by the stream. H. T. We have Part 87 of F. von Mueller's ' Fragmenta,' which completes the tenth volume of this miscellany of Australian Botany. There is an useful index to vols. vi. to x. issued with the part. The botanists of the west of France have been actively working at their interesting flora during the past two years, and M. Lloyd gives a summary of the principal results as a sort of appendix to his ' Flore de I'Ouest de la France,' the last edition of which is dated 1876. The tendency to make and name new species out of slight local forms seems very prevalent with some French botanists. Such are Thcdictrum Saratieri, Matthiola otjensis, and Viohi Foiicaudi, which are properly referred to T. minm, M. siniiata, and V. nana by Lloyd. An interesting FAatlne, from the tidal mud of the Loire at Trentemoult (Nantes), is named E. Inajterta, Lloyd. It differs from all the other European species in its completely-closed flowers which never open, the three petals forming a rounded button over tlie ovary; the flowers are sessile, with two sepals and three 158 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. stamens, as in F. triandra, Schlmhr, which is its nearest European ally. M. Lloyd thinks the plant may prove to be a form of E. americcuia, Arn. (which also has closed flowers), and possibly introduced many years ago with Ilysanthes gratioloides which grows with it. (See also a Note, by Prof. A. Gray, in ' Proc. Amer. Acad. ,' April 5, 1878, p. 361.) * Other New Books. — G. Bentham, assisted by F. von Mueller, ' Flora Australiensis,' vol. vii. Ruxhurghiacew to Filices (London, Lovell Reeve, 20.s'.) — Sereno Watson, 'Bibliographical Index to N. American Botany,' pai-t L, Polypetalo' (Washington, Smithsonian Institution, March,' 1878.) — W. R. McNab, ' Botany, Outlines of Morphology and Physiology ' (London Science Class-Books ; London, Longmans, 1878, l.s-. 6d.)—E. Hallier, 'Die Plastiden der niederen Pflanzen,' (Leipzig, Fues., 5^/?.) — T. Hartig, ' Anatomie and Physiologic der Holzpflanzen ' (Berlin. Springer, 20w.) — P. A. Saccardo, ' Fungi Italici autographice delineati,' fasc. 1 to 8 Patavii, 32s. — E. Strasburger, 'Befruchtung und Zelltheilung' (Jena, H. Dabis, Im.) — A. Franchet & L. Savatier, 'Enumeratio Plantarum in Japonia sponte crescentmm,' vol. ii., pars 2 (Paris, Savy, 8.S-. 6d.) Articles in Journals. — March, 1878. Grevillea.—'M. C. Cooke & J. B. ElHs, ' New-Jersey Fungi ' (con- tmued). — M. C. Cooke, 'New British Fungi.' — F. de Thuemen, ' Fungi ^gyptiaci collect, a G. Schweinfurth.' — Hazslinszky, 'Qeaster orientalis, n. sp.' (tab. 98). — Id., ' Belonia herculana, n. sp.' — M.C.Cooke, ' Indian Fungi.' — A.Ernst, ' Simhlum pilidiatum, n.sp.' Bot. Zeitung. — H. F. Jonkman, ' On the development of the pro- thallium in Marattiacea; ' (tab. 5, 6). — P. Krutizky, 'Description of an apparatus for estimatmg the amount of watery vapour absorbed by the plant.' — W. Breitenbach, 'Asparagus officinalh a trioecious plant.' — K. Goebel, ' On some marine Alga.' Flora. — P. G. Strobl, ' Flora of the Nebrodes ' (continued). — F. von Thuemen, ' Diagnoses of Thuemen' s Mycotheca Universalis.' — Biography of S. Kurz. — S. Schulzer, 'Influence of light on Fungi.' — Piosbach, ' Localities for rare plants near Treves.' — N.W. P. Rauwenhoft', ' On the so-called horn-tissue.' — 0. Bockeler, ' Diagno- ses of new and undescribed Cgperacem.' Hedwigia. — C. Gobi, ' On a Rivularia causing the phenomenon of " wasserbliithe " in sea-water.' — M. C. Cooke, 'North American Fungi.' — Fischer v. Waldheim, ' Ustilago Thuemenii.' Magyar Novengtani La})ok. — ' Unpublished letters of early bo- tanists: 1, Rembert Dodonaeus to C. Clusius.' — J. Kunszt, ' Flora of the Upper Neogradian Country' (continued). American Naturalist. — J.M.Anders, 'On the transpiration of plants.' PKOCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 159 Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschrift. — F. Hauck, ' .J^^cc of the Adiiatic' (con- tinued, tab. 1). — F. V. Hohnel, ' Eemarks on the cuticle.' — ' G. v. Niessl, ' Species of Sporormia' (continued). — F. Antoine, 'Botany of Vienna Exliibition' (continued). — J. Freyer, ' Muscari [Bellevalia, Leopoldia) Weissii, s]). nov.' — J. K. Stroecker, ' The molecular causes of plant-structures.' PtocteOtnss of Socuties. LiNNEAN Society of London. March 7, 1878. — Dr. Gwyn Jeffreys, Vice-President in the chau'. — Mr. Charles P. Hobkirk, of Huddersfield, was elected a Fellow of the Society. — Mr. Thomas Christy exhibited and made remarks on a series of fruits, among which were Chinese Quinces, Chayottes, and a fingered Citron known in China as the " Claw of Buddha." — The following papers were read : — ' On the Laws govern- ing the production of Seed in Wistaria sinensis,'' by Thos. Meehan. The author pointed out that the Chinese Wistaria, when sup^jorted, grows with wonderful rapidity, branches and flowers being plen- tiful, but that it seldom or never i:»roduces seeds. On the other hand, tree Wistarias seed abundantly, but send forth shoots very sparuigly. In fact, in the one case vegetative, in the other re^n'o- ductive, force predominates. Eecent contributions inclme to connect the above circumstances with insect agency and cross fertilization. Bees perforate the corolla from the outside instead of entermg the mouth. From his observations, however, Mr. Meehan believes that the question at issue is not related to pollenization, but rather bears on the harmonious relation of the nutritive powers. — ' Enumeration of the Fungi collected during the Arctic Expedition, 1875-76,' by the Eev. M. J. Berkeley. The series consists of twenty-six species, all determined save two left doubtful from con- dition of specimens. Of the above, seventeen are widely distributed already well-known forms, but seven are new and hitherto unde- scribed species. Of these last, Agaricus Feildeni, probably esculent, and Urmila Hartii are the most interesting. The occurrence of Chatomium glabrum on the walls of the cabin of H.M.S. ' Alert,' in great abundance, is very curious, and notably the smaller size of its sporidia in the Arctic specimens. Botautcal NtiDS. It is intended to open the International Congress of Botany and Horticulture at Paris, on August 16th; it will last a week, and will be held at the roonis in the Rue de Grenelle, No. 84. The following matters are proposed for discussion :— The physiology of the root ; gymnospermy ; the reproduction of Hymenomycetes and 160 BOTANICAL NEWS. Ascomycetes ; also, the orgauiscation of botanical laboratories ; the arrangement of botanical museums and herbaria ; and the planning, classifying, and labelling of botanic gardens. It is desired to form an exhibition of herbaria, botanical instruments and apparatus, plans of laboratories and gardens, books, plates, drawings, diagrams, &c. Botanists intending to be present should send their names to the Organismg Committee at the above address. Besides the sessions of the Congress, there will be organised excursions and visits to scientific establishments, the details of which will be pub- lished hereafter. We are pleased to learn that the Senate of the University of Cambridge has granted an assistant curator of the herbarium which has long been in need of such help. The vacancy caused at Kiel by Prof. Eichler's call to Berlin is filled by the api3ointment of Prof. Engler, of Munich. Prof. Schwendener, of Tubingen, also goes to Berlin. The death, in his sixtieth year, of Moeitz Seubert, Professor in the Polytechnic School at Carlsruhe, occurred on April 6th. He is known as the author of the first Flora of the Azores, — ' Flora Azorica,' published in 1844, and founded on Hochstetter's collec- tions made in 1838 ; this is illustrated w^tli good plates, drawn by the author. He also published a monograph of the genus Elatine in' the 'Nova Acta' for 1845, and elaborated many of the mono- cotyledonous Orders for the ' Flora Brasiliensis,' besides writing some good local Floras of S.W. Germany. Mr. H. C. Watson dedicated a genus to him, founded on Bellis azorica, but Seubertia has not been mamtainedby the authors of the ' Genera Plantarum.' We have also to note the death, at Friburg, of August Jaeger, a well-known Swiss bryologist, and author of several papers on the mosses of that country. We regret to record the death of Thomas Thomson, M.D., which occurred on 18th Aj)ril. He was born in Glasgow in 1817, and was educated in the University of that city. He entered the service of the Hon. E. India Company as assistant-sui-geon, and botanized in the N.W. j)rovinces. In 1847, he was selected to accompany the mission to Tibet, which visited that country in 1848-49. At the end of that year he joined Dr. J. D. Hooker, at Darjiling, and they spent the year 1850 in travelling and collecting in the Kliasia Mountams, returning together to England in the spring of 1851 with very large collections. The next few years was emi)loyed at Kew in naming and distributing these. Dr. Thomson w^as afterwards appointed to the Directorship of the Calcutta gardens, but remained there but a few years, returning to England about 1860, since when feeble health has prevented him from doing much botanical work. Dr. Thomson's most im- portant contribution is the first volume (extending only from Uanun- culaceir to Fuiiiariacea) of the elaborate "Flora Indica," of which he was joint author with Dr. (now Sir) J. D. Hooker, and which was pubhshed in 1855. ©ttstnal Mxtitlt^. A NEW KEY TO THE GENEEA OF AMARYLLIDACEM. By J. G. Bakek, F.L.S. In the present paper I propose to attempt to construct a key to the genera of Amaryllidacea, in which flower-characters shall he used as prominently as possible. The genera of the Order are well and fully described in detail in three comparatively recent works, viz., Herbert's ' Amaryllidacese,' published in 1837 ; the fifth volume of Kunth's 'Enumeratio,' x^ublished in 1850; and the fragment of Salisbury's ' Genera Plantarum,' which was issued by Dr. John Edward Gray in 1866. But still, for everyday working purposes, a key of the Order is greatly needed, partly because it is very difficult to judge h'om a long description, where nothing is emphasised, which characters are relied upon as differential, and partly because the primary arrangement and grouping used by these authors depends to a large extent upon fruit and seed-characters, and these are seldom shown either by living or dried specimens in the state in which they are commonly submitted to botanists for identification. And another x^oint is, that not to speak of Salisbiuy, whose ideas of a genus were such that he proposes to make sixteen out of Xarcissiis as we commonly understand it, many of Herbert and Kunth's genera are limited by characters so faint that they are not at all likely to be adopted by general botanists, who have the whole vegetable kingdom to deal with. And one great good of these keys, whether they deal with genera or species, is that they are so well adapted to bring into prominence which of the separate individualities they deal with rest upon an unsubstantial diagnostic foundation. As I have lately dealt elsewhere with the AgavecB and Hypoxidacem, what I propose to do now is simply to attempt to make a key for the Amari/llidacecB proper and AlstrcemeriecB, and to follow it up by a few explanatory remarks referring mainly to the reductions that seem needful in genera and species as they stand in Kunth, and the comj)aratively few novelties that have been discovered in the Order during the last thirty years. Subordo I. Amakyllidace^ ver^. Herbae bulbosaB acaules, floribus umbellatis vel solitariis. Tribus I. Galanthe^. Stamina epigyna,filamentisbrevibusliberis, antheris ax3ice dehiscentibus. I. Galanthus. Perianthii segmenta interiora exterioribus multo breviora, cuneata, obtusa, profunde emarginata. Kicrojja, Asia occidentalis. N. s. VOL. 7. [June, 1878.] y 162 A NEW KEY TO THE GENERA OF AMARYLLIDACE.E. II. Leucojum. Periantliii segmeiita omnia consimilia aequilonga. Europa, Asia occidentalis, Ah/eria, Mauritania. Tribus II. StrumarievE. Stamina epigyna, filamentis elongatis liberis, antlieris latere cleliiscentibus. III. Strumaria. G-enus solum. C. B. Spei. Tribus III. Amaryllide.e. Stamina perigyna, filamentis liberis hand appencliculatis. Subtribus I. Zephyranthe.e. Uniflorae, rarissime biflorae, peri- antliio erecto, segmentis cum staminibus undique ab stylo divergentibus. * Filamenta brevissima. IV. Haylockia. Scax^us brevissimus, hypogseus. Perianthium infundibulare. Stamina 6, uniseriata. Stigma trifidum. Fructus capsularis, seminibus iiigris discoideis. Monte Video. V. Apodolirion. Sca^Dus brevissimus, hypogseus. Perianthium infundibulare. Stamina 6, distincte biseriata. Stigma capitatum. Fructus ignotus. C. B. Spei. VI. Gethyllis. Scapus brevissimus, liypogaeus. Perianthium infundibulare. Stamina 6, vel plura, uniseriata. Stigma sub- capitatum. Fructus baccatus, seminibus turgidis. (J. B. Spei. VII. CoopERiA. Scapus elongatus. Perianthium subrotatum. Fructus cai^sularis, seminibus nigris discoideis. Te.vas, Mexico. ** Filamenta producta. ^^II. Sternbergia. Perianthii tubus brevis vel productus cylin- dricus. Stigma subcapitatum. Fructus subbaccatus, seminibus turgidis. Flores lutei. Eurojxi, Oriens, Mauritania. IX. Zephtranthes. Perianthii tubus brevis vel nuUus. Stigma trifidum, stigmatibus subulatis. Fructus capsularis, seminibus nigris discoideis. Flores saspissime albidi vel rubelli. Amer. trap, et suhtemperata. X. Pyrolirion. Perianthii tubus productus, late infundibularis. Stigma trifidum, stigmatibus magnis, apice cochleatis. Fructus capsularis, seminibus nigris discoideis. Andes Peruvian et BolivicB. Subtribus II. H.^^manthe.e. Flores umbellati, perianthii tubo brevi vel nullo, segmentis angustis cum staminibus undique ab stylo divergentibus. * Ovida in loculo 3 velpaxica. Semina turgida. XI. Hvemanthus. Umbella densiflora, capitata, pedicellis brevibus, bracteis verticillatis. Stigma subcapitatum. Antherae versatiles. Fructus baccatus. ('. B. Spei, Africa tropicahs. XII. Buphane. Umbella multifiora, pedicellis elongatis, bracteis binis. Stigma capitatum. Anthert'e versatiles. Fructus cai)sulaiis. C. B. Spei, Africa tropicalin. A NEW KEY TO THE GENEKA OF AMARYLLIDACE.E . 163 XIII. Hessea. Umbella pancifiora vel miiltiliora, iDeclicellis elongatis, bracteis binis. Stigma trifidnm, stigmatibus siibulatis. Antberae basifix^. Fructus caj)sularis. C. B. Spei. xiY. Caepolyza. Umbella pauciflora,pedicellis elongatis, bracteis binis. Stigma trifidnm. iCntherfe minutae, dorsifix^e. Fructus capsularis. C. B. Spei. ** Ovula in loculo i)lura. Semina discoidea vel triquetra. XV. Lapiedra. Perianthinm rotatum, album, tubo nullo vel brevissimo. Stigma capitatum. Hispania, Mauritania. x\^. Anoiganthus. Periantbinm infundibular e, lutescens, tubo brevi. Stigma trifidnm. C. B. Spei. x\^i. Ungeenia. Periantbinm tubuloso-campanulatum, mini- atum, tubo brevi. Stigma capitatum. Persia. Subtribus III. Olivier. Flores umbellati, tubo brevi vel raro segmentis aequilongo, segmentis obtusis conniventibus, geni- talibus rectis vel declinatis. xvui. Clria. Bulbus subnullus. Folia plura, lorata, per- sistentia. Semina in loculo solitaria, magna. C. B. Spei. XIX. Ph^dranassa. Bulbus tunicatus. Folia 1-2, liysterantliia, petiolata. Stamina vix exserta. Semina in loculo plura, discoidea. Amer. Trop. XX. Callipsyche. Bulbus tunicatus. Folia 1-2, hysteranthia, petiolata. Stamina longe exserta, declinata. Semina in loculo plura, discoidea. Amer. trop. Subtribus IV. BRUNS\^GIE^. Flores umbellati. Perianthii tubus bre\ds vel nullus, segmentis angustis cum genitalibus con- tiguis declinatis. * Folia petiolata. Ovula in loculo gemina erecta. XXI. Griffinia. Genus solum. Brasilia. ** Folia sessilia. Ovula in loculo plura, superposita. XXII. Sprekelia. Perianthinm bilabiatum, segmentis 3 in- ferioribus contiguis. Amer. trop. xxm. Nerine. Perianthinm regulare. Ovarium parvum, ob- longum. Folia subsynanthia. C. B. Spei, Asia orientalis. XXIV. Brunsvigia. Perianthinm regulare. Ovarium magnum, turbinatum, angulatum. Folia hysteranthia. C. B. Spei. Subtribus V. Amaryllide^. Flores umbellati, perianthii tubo saepissime brevi, segmentis latis oblongis vel obovatis. XXV. Amaryllis. Perianthinm infundibulare, genitalibus ^ecli- natis. Semina pauca, magna, turgida. C B. Spei. XXVI. Hippeastrum. Perianthinm infundibulare, genitalibus declinatis. Semina plura, nigra, discoidea. Amer. trop. et sub- temper ata. 1(54 A XEW KEY TO THE GENEKA OF AMARYLLIDACE.E. xx^^i. Vallota. Periantliium subrotatum, genitalibus vix de- clinatis. Semina plura, nigra, discoidea. C. B. Spei. Subtribus VI. CRiNEiE. Flores umbellati, perianthii tube elon- gate, segmentis angustis vel latis. * Perianthii tuhus cylindricus. XXVIII. Crinum. Filamenta saepissime elongata. Stigma capi- tatum. Flores albi vel rubidi. Fie(j. caUdiores totius orbis. XXIX. Chlidanthus. Filamenta brovissima. Stigma trifidum. Flores lutei. Andes. ** PeriantMi tubus infiiudibidaris. XXX. Urceolaria. Folia oblonga, petiolata. Perianthium luteo- viiide, segmentis lanceolatis, tubo asquilongis. Andes. XXXI. Pentlandia. Folia linearia, sessilia. Perianthium coc- cineum, segmentis i^arvis oblongo-deltoideis. Andes. XXXII. Cyrtanthus. Folia sessilia, linearia, vel lorata. Perian- thiiun rubellum, lutescens vel albidnm, segmentis tubo 2-4 -plo brevioribus. C. B. Spei. Tribus IV. Pancratie^. Stamina perigyna, filamentis appendulatis, ssepissime deorsum in coronam monadelx^liam coalita. * Filamenta dentata, hand monadelpha. xxxiii. Eustephia. Flores rubro-virides. Perianthii tubus bre vis, campanulatus ; segmenta oblanceolata. Folia sessilia, linearia Peru via. xxxiv. Vagaria. Flores albi. Perianthii tubus cylindricus ; segmenta linearia. Folia sessilia, linearia. Syria. XXXV. Calliphruria. Flores albi. Perianthii tubus infundibu- laris. Segmenta oblonga, tubo sequilonga. Folia petiolata, oblonga. Cohuidna. ** Filamenta in coronam deorsum monadelpha. + Perianthii segmenta linearia. xxx^q. Tapeinanthus. Perianthii tubus brevissimus. Corona brevissima, filamentis divergentibus. Flores lutei. Hispania. xxxvii. Hyline. Perianthii tubus iiullus. Corona brevissima, filamentis loiigis rectis. Flores albi. Brasilia. xxxvm. Hymenocallis. Perianthii tubus cylindricus. Corona magnitudine mediocris, filamentis elongatis divergentibus. Semina magna bulbiformia. America trupicaUs et suh-temperata. xxxix. Ismene. Perianthii tubus cylindricus. Corona magna, filamentis brevibus inflexis. Semina magna, bulbiformia. America tropicalis et suhtemperata. XL. Pancratium. Perianthii tubus c,ylindricus. Corona magna, filamentis brevibus. Semina j)lura atra. lieyiunes trupicales et sub- tonp. totius orbis. A NEW KEY TO THE GENERA OF AMARYLLIDACE^ . 165 XLi. Placea. Penanthii tubus nullus vel brevissimus. Corona parva, filamentis declinatis. Flores rubelli vel lutei. Chili. xLii. Elisena. Perianthii tubus cylindricus. Corona magna, filamentis productis declinatis. Flores albi. Ancles. + f Perianthii segmenta oblonga. XLHi-. EucHARis. Perianthium rotatum. Columbia. xLiv. Calostemma. Perianthium infundibulare. Ovarium 1-locu- lare, ovulis in loculo geminis coUateralibus. Australia. XLV. Eurycles. Perianthium infiindibulare. Ovarium tri- loculare, ovulis in loculo geminis coUateralibus. Asia trojncalis ; Australia horealls. XL\^. Leperiza. Perianthium regulare, tubo brevi-oblongo. Stamina breviter exserta. Ovula plura, superposita. Andes. xLvii. Stenomesson. Perianthium regulare, tubo producto in- fundibulari. Stamina inclusa vel breviter exserta. Ovula plura, superposita. Andes. XLvin. EucRosiA. Perianthium ringens. Stamina longe exserta. Ovula plura, superposita. Andes. Tribus V. Narcisse^. Stamina intus coronam petaloideam inserta, filamentis exappendiculatis. XLix. Callithauma. Perianthium infundibulare. Andes Peruvia. L. Narcissus. Perianthium rotatum. Furojm, Asia, Mauritania, Algeria. Subordo II. Alstrcemerie^. Herba caulescentes, floribus ssepissime umbellatis, raro spicatis vel racemosis. * Rhizovia bulhosum vel tuberosum. LI. IxiOLiRiON. Perianthium infundibulare, tubo nullo. Ehizoma bulbosum. Flores umbellati vel racemosi. Asia occidentalis. Lii. Polianthes. Perianthium tubuloso - infundibulare, tubo elongato. Ehizoma tuberosum. Flores gemini, spicati. Asia tropicalis. ** Ehizoma nullum. Flores in umbellam simplicem vel compositam dispositi. Liii. Alstrcemeria. Perianthium irregulare. America australis. Liv. BoMAREA. Pciianthium regulare, segmentis exterioribus interioribus difformibus. America tropicalis, prccsertim Andes. Lv. LEONTOcmR. Periaiitliium regulare, segmentis exterioribus interioribus conformibus. Chili. 166 A NEW KEY TO THE GENERA OF AMARYLLIDAGE^. REMARKS. 1. Galanthi(,s. — Here I consider there are three species, viz., 1, nivalis, of which I)nperati,'Bevt., iatif alius, Enprecht, and reflexus, Herb., are varieties ; 2, FAtvesii, Hook, fih, in ' Bot. Mag.,' t. 6166 ; and 3, plicatus. G. PuyimF-O/gfs, of Orphanides, I know by name only. 2. Leucqjum. — Inchiding Erinosma and Acis, as in Kimth, good as subgenera, and under the latter Buwinia, of Parlatore, — species 8 or 9. L. Hernandezianum , Camb., is evidently the same as L. jiuJchellum, Salisb., which is common in London gardens. Of the species of Acis in Kunth, I should join grandifloriim with trichophijlhim. None of those figured by Jordan and Fourreau (' Icones,' figs. 103 to 108) seem distinct from those given in Kunth. L. autumnale is autumnal, all the others vernal. L. hyeniale is a misleading name, as the plant flow^ers in April (not autumn, as stated by Kunth); Paiminia niceceensis, Jord. & Fourr., is identical with it. 3. Strumaria. — Includmg Imhojia. Seven sj)ecies, Baueriana being conspecific with linguafolia, and BurclieUiana and Bergiana with geminata. 4. Haglockia. — Monotypic. 5. AjmdoUrion. — Three species, as described 'Journ. Bot.,' 1878, p. 74. 6. GethgUis. — Four species known in flower, and one clearly distinct, and one doubtful m fruit only. G. acaulis, Blanco, is doubtless a CurcuUgo. 7. Cuoperia. — Two species ; mexicana, now known in flower, being identical with Drummondii. 8. Sternhergia. — Including Oporanthus ; five species, Kunth's needing much reduction. S. dalmatica, (Ptnmsis, citrina, and perhaps even Clusiana seem to be the same species as colchicifiora, and Fischeriana and probably e.i-igua to belong to lutea. Of new discoveries we have .S'. macrantha, J. Gay {S. latifolia, Boiss.), the finest plant in the genus, and 5'. pidcliella, Boiss. & Blanche. S. sicula, Tineo, is a variety of lutea, and S. e.cscajja, Tineo, alto- gether doubtful. 9. Zephgranthes. — Two subgenera, as in Kunth. Species about fifteen, Grahamiana being a form of sessilis ; Jfavesceiis and acuminata of viesochloa; Lindlegana and nervosa, M. & G., identical with pcdUda ; and texana the same as Habranthus Andersoni var. texanus. 10. Fyrolirion. — The three species in Kunth are doubtfully distinct ; albicans rests still solely on the authority of Feuille ; and there are two novelties still undescribed in Mandon's plants of the Bolivian Andes. 11. Haimanthus, — Species about thirty, five of which are Tropical African, and the rest Cape. The structm-e of the flower is very uniform through the genus. Of the plants in Kunth, concolor and Hookerianus are probably the same as sanguineus. A NEW KEY TO THE GENERA OF AilARYLLLDACE^ . 167 strigosiis, and h-evifoliiis mere forms of carneus ; tenuifolius the same as abyssinicus ; and H. coccineus, Forsk. {H. arabicus, Eoem.), of which there is a ty^De- specimen in the Smithian herbarium, identical also with ahi/ssinicus. Of published novelties since Kunth, there are H. natalemis, Hook, 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5378 ; H. cinnabarinus, Decne., 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5314; H. defonuis, Hook fil., 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5903 ; H. rotularis, rupestris, and Katherince, Baker ; and there are fom- or five novelties in the group of H. coccineus still unde- scribed. 12. Buphane. — Two distinct species, disticha and toxicaria being identical, and a third ((/uttata) doubtful ; toAcaria has been gathered lately in Zambesi-land by Dr. Meller, and on the banks of Lake Tanyanika by Lieut. Cameron. 13. Hessea. — Species two to three, Dreffeana being doubtfully distmct from stellar is. The plant described in detail by Kunth under H. crispa is this same stellar is, and Amaryllis crispa, Jacq., 'Hort. Schoen,' t. 72, is a distinct species. 14. Carpolyza. — Monotypic. 15. .Lapiedra. — Species two. Martinezii, impei-fecily described by Kunth, is fully figured by Boissier, 'Voy. Hisp.,' t. 171 ; and a second very distinct sj)ecies, yet undescribed, is in Schousboe's Mauritanian collection, 16. Anoiyanthus. — Two species, as described ' Joiu'n. Bot.,' 1878, p. 76. 17. Unyernia, Bunge, in 'Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Mosc.,' 1875, ii., 171. Monotypic. 18. Cliria. — Three species, the two additional to Kunth's being C. Gardeni, Hook., in 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 4895, and Imantoplujllum miniatum, Hook., in 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 4783. 19. Phadranassa. — Three species, chloracea, obtusa, and multi- Jiora, being mere forms of one ; and the two novelties, P. CarmioH, Baker, in 'Ref. Bot.,' t. 46, and P. riridijiora, Baker. 20. Callipsyclie. — Three species, the two additions being C. aurantiaca, Baker, in 'Eef. Bot.,' t. 167, and C. mirabilis, Baker, m 'Eef. Bot.,' t. 168. 21. Grifftnia. — Seven species now known, the additions being G. ornata, Moore; G. Bluvmiacia, 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5666; and G. Liboniana, Morren. G. dryades, Roem., the finest plant in the genus, mentioned in Kunth by name only, is figured and fully described by Sir Joseph Hooker from the Saunders' collection, 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5786. 22. Sprehelia. — Only two good species ; ylauca, rinyens, and Karicinskii being varieties oi formosissiiiia. 23. Serine. — Licluding Ammocharis and Lycoris. Species, eighteen. I cannot make out any definite line of demarcation between these three. If we widen AmmocJiaris, as in Kunth, to take in Xerine lucida and rnaryinata, it diflers from the other two by its short, stout sca^De, and resembles Brunsviyia in habit but not in ovary and fruit. Additional species to those in Kunth are Xerine japonica, Miquel, and Lycoris Seiverzuici, Kegel. 168 A NEW KEY TO THE GENERA OF AMARYLLIDACE^ . 24. Brumviyia. — Eight species ; B. Coojjeri, Baker, in ' Ref. Bot.,' t. 330, being added to those in Kunth. 25. Amaryllis. — Monotypic, A. hlanda being a variety of Bella- donnat and A. staminca, Seubert, a synonym of Hippeastrum stylosum, Herb. 26. Hippeastrum. — Including Habranthus, Phycella, and Rhodo- phiala, as in Kunth; and lilwdolirion, PhiUppi, in 'Linnsea,' xxix., p. 65. Species about fifty, those m Kunth needing to be much reduced, especially in Habranthus. Many novelties have been described by Philippi and others. For details, see 'Joiuii. Bot.,' 1878, p. 79. 27. Vallota. — Monotypic. 28. Crinmn. — Species about fifty, those in Kunth needing little change. C. Lindleyanmn, undulatum, attemmtuvi, Commelyni, and yracilijiurum are scarcely more than varieties of erubescens. The principal novelties are C. Moorei, Hook, fil., in 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 6113; C. Tinneanum, of Kotschy and Peyritsch; C. wiijiorum, F. Muller ; C. jioridanmn, Fraser ; and C. Macowajii, Baker ; and there are three or four others still undescribed. C. brachynema, Herb., im- perfectly described by Kunth, which differs from all the rest by its short filaments, has now been introduced in a living state from Western India, and is figured 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5937. 29. Chlidanthus. — Monotypic ; Elirhenberyii being, apparently, the same as frayrans, and Cumingii something totally different, probably Hippeastrum advenum. 30. Urceolaria, Herb. — {Collania, Schultes, a later name. ) Mono- typic ; fiilva being a mere form of p)endula. 31 . Pentlandia. — Monotypic. 32. Cyrtanthus. — Three sections, — Cyrtantlms proper, Monella, and (Tastronema, with the last of which Cyphonema is identical. Species fifteen ; pallidiis, striatus, and ventricosus being, apparently, varieties of anyustifoUus ; and the additions, C. Mackenii, Hook. fil. ; C. sanyuineus, Hook., in 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 5218; and C. Macoivani and Tuckii, Baker. 33. Eustephia. — Monotypic. See ' Journ. Bot.,' 1878, p. 39. 34. Vayaria. — Monotypic. Pancratium parvifiorum, Kunth, is identical. 35. Calliphruria. — Species three ; the additions being 0. edentata, Baker, in 'Bot. Mag.,' t. 6289; and a third, still undescribed. 36. Tapeinanthus = Carreynua, Boiss. — Monotyinc. 37. Hyline. — Monotypic. 38. Hymenocallis. — Including Choretes. Species ten to fifteen, those in Kunth needing great reduction. H. Bonplandi is a Eucharis. 39. Ismme. — Species five to six; peduuculata, Madeanica, and virescens being apparently identical. Two novelties yet undescribed. /. dejiexa is probably a hybrid between Ismene and Elisena, such as Colonel Trevor Clarke has lately raised. 40. Pancratium. — Species about a dozen : caroliniaymm being undistinguishable from maritimum ; malabathricum, Herb., fi'om A NEW KEY TO THE GENERA OF AMARYLLIDACE.E. 169 trifloriim, Roxb. ; and camhcujense, Herb., from longifiorum. Addi- tions are P. parvum, Dalzell, and P. collinum, Cosson & Durieu. P. tortifolium, Boiss., is P. tortuosuvi, Herb. ; and P. Chapmanni, Harv., and P. temdfoHum, Hochst., are P. trianthum, Herb. 41. Placed. — Species four; the three additions being P. lutea, Germaini, and Arzm, of Philippi. 42. Elisena. — Species two to three. 43. Eucharis. — Species two. E. Candida, Planch., in ' Flore des Serres,' t. 788 and-E. yra^idijiora, Planch., in ' Bot. Mag.,' t. 4791 [E. amazonica, Linden.) 44. Calostemma. — Species three. See ' Benth. Fl. Austral.,' vol. vi., p. 457. 46. Eurycles. — Species two; australis being the same as amhoinensis. 46. Leperiza. — Species two ; a second, still midescribed, im- ported lately from Ecuador by Messrs. E. G. Henderson & Son. 47. Stenomesson. — Including Cohurgia. Species about ten, Kunth's needing great reduction. See Baker, in ' Ref . Bot.,' sub. t. 308. Incaniata, splejidens, bichroma, variegata, chceapoyensis, versicolor, Imta, and miniata appear to be mere forms of one species, and recurvata, discolor, ohragillensis, lutea, and Mad eanica of another. Additions are ^S'. Pectrcei, Baker, in * Ref. Bot.,' t. 308, and S. suspensiun, Baker, in ' Ref. Bot.,' t. 22. 48. Eucrosia. — Monotypic, the habitat being Ecuador, not Peru, as given in Kimth. 49. Callithauma. — Species two. 50. Xarcissus. — Including Corhularia, Ajax, Queltia, Ganymedes, and Hermione. Species, twenty-one. 51. Ixiolirion. — Monotypic ; tataricum. being a mere variety of montanmn. It extends to Beloochistan and Afghanistan. 52 . PoUanthes. — Monotypic . 53. Alstrcemeria. — Species twenty to thkty, or more, a large number of novelties from Chili having been described from Philippi and several from Brazil by myself (' Journ. Bot.,' 1877, p. 259.) 54. Bomarea. — Including Sphaerine and Wichuroia. Species about fifty, Kunth's needing to be greatly reduced, es2)ecially in the neighbourhood of B. edtdis. A fine addition is B. Carderi, Masters, and there are many others still undescribed. Sphoerine and Wichurcca differ from Bomarea in habit alone. Both this genus and Alstrcemeria greatly need re-monographiilg from present material. 55. Leontochir, Philippi. — ' Desc. Nuev. Plant.,' p. 69. Mono- typic. 170 ON A POINT IN BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. ON A POINT IN BOTANICAL NOMENCLATUKE. By Henry Trimen, M.B., F.L.S., &c. In the discussion which has been carried on in these pages with regard to the scientific names of species, it is obvious that there are in reahty very few points in dispute. Matters upon which the opinion of botanists is now practically unanimous, such as the claim of priority in date, the non-validity of nomina nuda, the inadmissibility of nomina falsa, of duplicate names, &c., need not, therefore, be further alluded to here. In makmg some observations in opposition to the position ably defended by Mr. Ball (pp. 140-2), it is first necessary to call attention to the fact that the scientific name of a plant consists essentially of two words only, the first of which is that of the genus, and may be called the generic half of the name, whilst the second may be termed its specific half. If either of these halves be changed a new name necessarily results. I may then state the questions at issue as follows : — 1. Ought an author to be bound by law to conserve the specific half of the name of a plant when he transfers the latter to a genus in which it has not been previously placed (or adopts such a transfer which has been already made without the bestowal of a new name), and when he consequently has to make a new name? 2. Ought an author, when he adopts a generic transfer which has been already made with the bestowal of a new name, to be at liberty to reject its specific half, and to make another (necessarily at least a thu'd) new name, by restoring the specific half of the original name, and adding it to the generic half of the previous new one ? The "Lois" adopted by the Botanical Congress at Paris in 1867 answer the first question in the affirmative, but the greater part of the discussion in these pages has had reference mainly to the second, and it is to it that the following remarks are addressed. Affirmation of the first, however, logically involves that of the second also, for it compels the opinion that, since the previous new name or names were made in defiance of law, they have no validity ; consequently that a subsequent author is not only at liberty but even bound to supplant it or them by a new one duly compounded according to the statute. Therefore if it could be shown that such a practice were undesirable, and led to much change and confusion, it would render it highly probable that the -'law" itself was injudicious and should not be enforced. Mr. Ball has, however, very iDroperly insisted on the desirability of some fixed rule in the matter. This is felt by all, and I would add that, in the interests of science, and with a view of attaining final unanimity, such a rule, if generally accepted, should be carried out rigorously, and with ON A POINT IN BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. 171 less veneration for names " sanctioned by the general agreement of modern writers of authority " than Mr. Ball would accord. But it appears to me that a rule does exist, and has been acted upon by most systematists from Linnaeus downwards, — certainly by many more than have accepted the Paris " Law " of 1867. It is, indeed, with the object of putting forward more prominently than has yet been done in this discussion the practice so generally followed for many years, and to advocate the framing of a fixed rule founded upon it, that I have ventured to enter on this con- troversy again. This practice is, to employ the earliest published name the generic half of which is the name of the genus adopted, and thus to avoid making a new name by the resuscitation of the specific half of an older combination. It would be very easy to show, from the writings of the best systematic botanists, that this is the principle they recognize, though it has never been formu- lated into a distinct law.* This, however, could be readily done ; ,it would be fully as clear and definite as the new rule advocated by Mr. Ball, and would possess the great advantage of not much dis- turbing the existing state of things. For, indeed, the amount of change and the number of new names which would follow the proper and legitimate carrying out of the new rule would be very great ; and it is no doubt the con- sciousness of this which has led Mr. Ball to stipulate beforehand that it is not to interfere with "names sanctioned by general agree- ment." But we may well demur to introducing a new law intended to bring about uniformity in nomenclatm-e, coupled with an exception from its influence caj)able of almost indefinite extension, and which everybody would interpret for himself. If the law is a judicious one, let it be fahiy and thoroughly carried out, with only the weU- known and generally recognized grounds of exception ; but do not let us introduce such an element of confusion as what is to be held to constitute "general agreement," and who are to be considered " modern writers of authority." I have purposely avoided saying anything about the "authority" following a name, because, in my oi3inion, this is a matter which should be left wholly out of consideration in this connexion. Whether the name which wiU have necessarily to be appended to the combination adopted be that of the discoverer or first describer of the species or not, in no way enters into the question at issue ; nothing more is indicated by the author's name than that he first duly published the combination and that it is used in the same sense as that in w^hich he employed it. But it seems to be thought by some botanists that the appended authority ought in some way to be the name of the original describer, by a kind of right. So Btrongly has this been felt by some, that the idea has been extended * Cryptogaiuists, however, ought perhaps to be excepted. Bentham states (Fl. Austral, vii. (1878), p. 699) that " the genera m Ferns have been thrown into such confusion and uncertainty that pteridologists acknowledge a right of priority in specific names, whatever may have been the genus under which they may have been first published." 172 ox A POINT IN BOTAXICAL NOMENCLATURE. even to tlie authors wlio described plants before Linnaeus reformed nomenclature, whose names have been appended as authorities to the names of the species which they described. Few writers have gone so far as this, yet it is worth w^hile for those who are disposed to think that it is the name of the first describer of a species that should follow its scientific title to remember that by far the great majority of the species to which Linn, is attached were neither discovered nor described by that master of method. The more, however, that this matter is looked into, the more clearly it appears desirable to insist that the history of a plant is one thing, the name which has to be adopted for it is another. The synonymy and history of a sj)ecies must be worked out in detail, and requh'e to be fully exhibited ; they cannot be usefully amalgamated with the name." These matters are not unconnected with the position taken up by Mr. Ball, if we may add to his precepts his practice as exliibited in the recently-published ' Spicilegium Florae Maroccan^e.' t The new rule and the principles advocated have incidentally resulted in a nomenclature which cannot be considered an improvement on the old system. Instead of the binary nomenclature to which we are all accustomed, by the new system we have often four words in the name besides the authority. This has come about by the necessity of trying to avoid " making an author say what he has not said " (to use Prof. DeCandolle's words) which the new rule is very likely to effect. Let us take, for mstance, the species Mr. Ball has employed in his paper as a typical case, Arenaria diandm, Guss. He refers the plant to Spergulana, and according to the practice advocated above he should take the earliest name in that genus, and call the plant Sjjergularia patens, Hochst. But by the new rule he is bound to restore the specific half of Gussone's name (though it is not very appropriate), and write Spergulana diandra. As Boissier has abeady done this, the name should be S. diandra, Boiss. But Mr. Ball thinks it proper to Amte " S. diandra, Guss. (sub Arenaria.y It is clear that this name and authority ivithoiit the portion in brackets does not exi3ress a true statement of fact ; indeed it is making Gussone say what he has not said ; his name is appended to a combination made by Boissier, and of which he might have disapproved. The portion in brackets is intended to explain this mis-statement ; but after more than a century of the binominal nomenclature we really camiot go back to names five words long. It is true that the above system of quotation is no necessary part of carrying out the new rule, but it has been followed by M. Boissier and some others who advocate its adoption as well as by Mr. Ball. It appears to spring from a reluctance to placing as tlie authority the name of a writer who may have merely made a transfer, and from a desire to give a piece of the history of the * On this point, see some excellent observations, by Prof. A. Gray, in ' Jonrn. Bot.,' 1804, p. 1S9-100 (extracted from ' Silliman's Journal.') t Mourn, Linn. Soc. Lend.,' vol. xvi, OBSERVATIONS ON THE GENUS PHYLLACHNE. 173 plant along with its name. But even if the new rule became generally accepted, it is little likely that this system of quotation would be followed also. If we are to retain the binominal nomenclature, botanists w^ill have to write Sjierriidaria diandra, Boiss. ; and if it be desired to give additional information, it must be done by appending synonyms [Arenaria diandra, Guss., S}}ergulana patens, Hochst., &c.) Unless this be done, we are certain to find persons writing the incorrect name, " Sjjergidana diandra, Guss." The only reason given in favoiu* of the new i^ractice by Mr. Ball is that it w^ould be a less tax on the memory if the same specific half were adhered to imder all generic changes. But the argument is not a strong one. The whole question, it must be remembered, is one for the close student of systematic botany only. In the careful research which he must always make, he has less occasion to draw^ largely upon his memory than to use his judgment and his knowledge of bibliography. He aims at finality, com- pleteness, and accuracy as to facts ; simplicity and freedom from ambiguity in their expression. I think the new rule fails in helping to secure any one of these. OBSEEVATIONS ON THE GENUS PHYLLACHNE. By Baron Ferd. von Mueller, C.M.G., M.D., Ph.D., F.E.S. Some years ago I ventured to restore the genus Phyllachne (* Fragm. Phytogr. Austr.,' viii., 39-40), it being established in 1776 by the Forsters, whereas the younger Linne, only four years later, described the genus Forstera. The propriety of uniting these genera was suggested already by Swartz, in 1790 (' Schrader's Journal,' i., 273); but as at that time the laws of priority in naming plants were not rigorously adhered to, Willdenow (Suppl., iv., 148), in 1805, sacrificed the older name to the dictates of friendship, and maintained that of Forstera for the united genera. In this he w^as followed, as far as I am aware, by all subsequent writers on the subject, except A. L. and Adr. de Jussieu (' Annal. du Mus.,' xviii., 12, and 'Diction.,' v., 178), and Pfeiffer (' Nomen- clat. Bot.,' ii., 691), until Mr. Bentham and Sir Joseph Hooker in their ' Genera Plantarum ' severed again these two genera, Hooker having some years previously established on some species of Phyllachne his HelophyUiim (' Handb. of the New Zeal. Flora,' i., 167-168.) As the dehiscence of the fruit of these plants is one only of degree, serving merely for sectional distinction, it must be admitted that the generic separation rests mainly or entirely on habit ; while that again is of no avail in the closely-allied Stylidium, which is far more multiform in the external appearance of its species than Phyllachne adopted in its widest limitation. Under these circumstances, it is of particular interest to place on record an additional Phyllachne, which introduces another kind of habit into the genus, obliterating even to some extent the sectional characteristics adopted for Phyllachne and Forstera. The plant in 174 OBSERVATIONS ON THE GENUS PHYLLACHNE. question was iDrovisionally referred by Sir Joseph Hooker to Stylidium (as S. siihiilatim , 'Handbook,' i., 168), that celebrated investigator of New Zealand plants having only seen specimens very imperfectly in flower. I had long since exx)ressed to some con-espondents in New Zealand my belief, that this rare and re- markable plant would be found referable to Forstera {i.e., Phijllachne), the shortness and straightness of the column was indicative of of that genus, and this anticipation can now be verified from perfect flowering specimens, which, on my solicitation, were very obligingly procured by Professor W. Petrie, M.A., of Otago. The diagnosis is subjoined: — Phyllachne (Forstera J subulata. — Acaulis foliis elongatis subu- lato-hnearibus pedunculum longe superantibus confertis, calyce ebracteato glandulari puberulo 2-3-lobo, lobis 2 ro- tundatis vel duobus oblongatis et uno rotundato, coroUs lobis 4-5 tubo glandulari-puberulo duplo longioribus, co- lumnam conspicue excedentibus, fauce inappendiculata, capsula ovata ad apicem tardissime dehiscente. From the sea-level to the height of 2090 feet at Dunedin, Buff Hill and Invercargill, in tufts of Oreobolus ; Petrie. Longest leaves measiu'ing nearly 1-^ inch. Peduncles half an inch long or shorter, almost glabrous. Lobes of the calyx about 1 line long (reminding of those of several Stylidiums), when round occasionally bilobulate. Lobes of the corolla oblong, not exceeding 2 lines. Column very similar to that of P. clavigera, immovable. Stigmas smooth. Fruit about one-thkd of an inch long. Seeds measuring in length half a line. Speaking thus of a member of the Stylidece, I may be allowed incidentally to remark that I see no reason for changing my views in reference to the true systematic position of Donatia, as expressed in the 'Fragm.' viii. 41, although its ripe fruit remains still un- known. I gave on that occasion several instances of Orders which contain genera with free and connate petals ; I may here add that Donatia holds in this respect the same relation to other StylidecB that Dialypetalum does to Lobelia, Lysinema to Epacris, and even some species of Marianthiis to others. I adhere also still to the view then enunciated, that Candollea could not possibly be kept generically apart from Hibbertia ; and this opinion was strengthened by my recent journey in West Australia. Furthermore, there seems no reason why the great name of DeCandolle should not be given again to the large and lovely Stylidium of Swartz — science could not offer a more glorious tribute; while Loureho's Stylidium should supersede i^/arZ^a ; and the dedication by Gaertner, in Forstera (' De Fructibus,' i. t. 28), be renewed, if the plant typical for this genus (Athecia) among CalyciflorcB, which has undeservedly sunk into obhvion,- could be traced anew in Forster's or Gaertner's collections. Melbourne, January 21, 1878. • It is merely mentioned by Roemer and Schultes (' Syst. Veg.' v. p. xxi. v Cryptogams ; 4. Brgogamia (== Miisci, &c.) ; 5. Gyrmiogamia (= Cellular Cryi)togams.) The book is written in an attractive style, and though its extent does not allow of a lengthy treatment, a number of subjects seem to be touched upon in a very instructive and suggestive manner. The figures are to a great extent original. H. T. In a recent instalment of his '* Contributions " (' Proc. American Acad.,' xiii., 361), Prof. A. Gray gives a synopsis of the American Elatines. The result of a careful examination of the existing material has been the discovery of two new species named E. brachysjjenna and E. californica. The same j)art contains two new genera of AcanthacecE, Carlowrightia [=-- Schaueria linearifolia, Torr.), ingeniously dedicated to the indefatigable explorer, Charles Wright, and Ciatesia (= Justicia Idtevirens, Buckley), named after Dr. Hezekiah Gates. There are also many new species of Astra- galus described. Prof. Lange gives ('Videnskab. Medd. Naturhist.' Forening,' Copenhagen, 1877), descrix}tions of some new species collected in Sixain and Portugal in recent years, especially by Hackel and Winkler in 1876. The parts of Bentley and Trimen's "Medicinal Plants" have hitherto continued to be issued with regularity. Among the plants described and figured in Parts 26 to 32 are these : — Aconitum ferox and A. heterophyllmn, Gynocardia odorata, tiarcinia mdica and G. Hanhurii, Galipea Ciisparia, Pilocarpus pemiatif alius , Citrus Bergamia, Lens esculenta, Butea frondosa, Astragalus gummifer, Liquidambar orientalis, Ferula Xarthe.v, Caruin Ajowan, Solenostemma Argel, Tylophora asthmatica, Capsicum fastigiatum , Xectandra Rodicei, Amomum Melegueta, Alpinia ojficinarum, Andropogon Nardus. Other New Books. — E. Kennedy, 'The Clydesdale Flora;' In Memoriam (4th) edition, with an Appendix by K. H. Paterson. (Hopkins, Glasgow, 1878, 3s. 6f/.)— W. R. McNab, ' Outlines of Classification of Plants ' (London Science Class-Books ; London, Longmans, 1878, Is. Qd.) — S. 0. Lindberg, ' Monographia Metz- gericB,' (Helsingfors, 1877.) — Id., ' Utkast till en Naturlig Gruppering af Europas bladmossor med toppsittande fi-ukt [Bryinm acrocarpm.y (Helsingfors, 1878.) — E. J. Waring, ' Bibliothecatherapeutica,' vol.i. (London, 1878, New Sydenham Society). — Capt. Sir G. S. Nares, ' Narrative of a Voyage to the Polar Sea' [Appendix xiv. Botany, by Sii' J. D. Hooker and others.] (Sampson Low, London, 1878). Articles in Journals. — April, 1878. Scottish Naturalist. — J. Stevenson, ' On Ptychogaster alhus.' — J. Stu-ton, ' On certain Lichens belonging to the ;genus Parmelia" (continued.) 188 PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. Midland Xaturalist. — M. J. Berkeley, ' Mernoii- of Eev. A. Bloxam.' Butaniska Xotiser. — V. B. Wittrock, 'On LinncBa borealis ' (con- tinued.)—Id., • The December Flora of Upsala, 1877.'— E. Warm- ing, ' List of Danish Botanical Literature for 1877.' Hot. Zeitimg. — C. Kellerman, E. v. Raumer, and M. Reess, ' Experiments on growth of Drosera rotundifolia with and without flesh.' — M. Traube, ' On the history of the mechanical theory of growth of organic cells.' — L. Celakovsky, 'On Chloranthy in Reseda lutea ' (tab.) Hcdn'i(jia. — C. Gobi, 'Further notes on the " Wasser-bliithe" of sea- water.' Flora. — C. Kraus, ' On some relations of light to the form and matter of plants.' — P. G. Strobl, 'Flora of the Nebrodes ' (continued). — F. Hildebrand, ' C. Hillburg's dissertation on the structure and functions of secondary leaves.' — 0. Bockeler, ' Diagnoses of new or undescribed CyperacecB ' (continued.) — F. de Thuemen, 'New species of American Fungi' {Thuemenia, Relim., n. gen.) American Naturalist. — E.L. Greene, ' Rambles in New Mexico,' ii. Oesterr. Bot. ZeitscJir. — G. Strobl, ' On the Sicilian species of Ranunculus with tubercular roots.' — F. von Holmel, 'Remarks on the cuticle ' (continued.) — F. Hauck, ' Alyoi of the Adriatic ' (con- tinued.)— L. von Vukotinovic, 'On Crocus vittatus, Schloss. & Vuk.' — V. von Borbas, ' Botanical notes.' — F. Aiitoine, ' Botany of the Vienna Exhibition ' (continued.) Magyar Xov. Lapok. — J. L. Holuby, ' On plants disappeared from the South Trencsinian district.' — J. Kunszt, 'Flora of the Upper Neogradian country' (continued). — L. Simkovics, 'Alnus harhata near Eperjes.' Xuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. (15th April). — T. Caruel, ' On the floral structm-e and af&nities of various monocotyledonous families.' — G. Gibelli, ' Answers to F. Delpino and G. Bertoloni.' — L. RatU- kofer, ' On a special arillus in Sapindacece.' — G. P. Papasogli, ' Genetical and histological study of the Olive.' — R. Pu'otta, ' Monograph of the genus Spororniia.' Bot. Tidsskrift (3, bd. ii, heft 2). — E. Warming, 'Biological and moi'phological notes ' (continued). ptocteDtnss of Societies* LiNNEAN Society of London. March 21,1878. — William Carruthers, Esq., Vice-President, in the chair. — The following were elected Fellows of the Society : — John Evans, Esq., F.R.S. ; C. P. Ogilvie, Esq. ; Arthur Vcitch, Esq.; Sydney H. Vines, Esq., B.A. — There was exhibited, on PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 189 behalf of G. T. Saul, Esq., an example of an enormous develop- ment of a mass of adventitious buds on the root of a species of Berberis. — The following paj)ers were read : — ' The Variation in the Leaf of Conium maculatum,' by John Gorham. The author has carefully registered and analyzed the minute distribution of the veins of the leaf, and he finds that a piece one-third of an inch long and one-fifth wide is an exact counterpart in its venation of the entu'e leaf and of the order ; and he believes that the principle, further extended, may be useful in diagnosis where minute frag- ments of a leaf are mspected. — ' On some Genera of Olacacea',' by John Miers. The author describes a new genus, Pihaptarrhena, and single species, from Brazil, allied to Aptandra.'^^ He further treats of three genera, Mijoschilos, Arjona and Quinchamcdiuni . The first consists of a single species, the second of eight species, and the third of seven species. All of the above three genera possess a distinct though small calyx, with the addition of a separate calycle on which the calyx is seated. — ' List of Fungi from Brisbane, Queensland, with description of new species,' by the Rev. M. J. Berkeley and C. E. Broome. Some 120 species had been placed in the author's hands by Messrs. L. A. Bernays and F. M. Bailey, of the Botanical Gardens, Brisbane. Among this series Agarics are scarce, as likewise Clavariel and other fleshy Fungi, possibly on account of difficulty of then- preservation. Among some thirty forms of PoJypurei are several interesting species. Ileodictijon gracile is alone representative in the series of the Phalloidei. Two species only of Myxogastres occur. Leaf- parasites are poorly represented. Three species of Helvellacei appear new, while there are some mteresting examples of Sphae- riacei. Hijpoxyhm cetrarioides of Currey, in perfect fruit, completes the author's history of that plant. Several species are identical with those of Ceylon and South America, and several with those of Europe. April 4. — W. Carruthers, Vice-President, in the chair. — The following gentlemen were elected Fellows of the Society : — F. M. Bailey, Esq., of Brisbane ; A. Hewan, Esq., M.D. ; G. Payne, jun., Esq. ; and J. R. Reid, Esq. — Dr. H. Trimen exhibited the per- sistent base of the stem of Cicuta rirosa, Linn., in its floating winter state, the example having been obtained near Yarmouth by Mr. H. G. Glasspoole. This was described by Dr. W. Watson and well figured by Ehret, in the ' Philos. Trans.' for 1746. — Mr. G. Murray showed, under the microscope, specimens of growing Saprolegnia, exhibiting terminal and inter- stitial oogonia. — The following papers were read : — ' On a Collection of Fungi from Texas,' by M. C. Cooke. These had been obtained by Mr. Ravenel some years ago : the author has added a list of all the recorded species. Altogether the series is small, showing that there yet remains much unknown in the mycologic flora of what is probably one of the richest States of the Union. — * Remarks on the peculiar properties ascribed to a * This proves to be Lissoccupa, Bentli., referred in the ' Genera Plantarum ' (p. 071) to Styracea. 190 PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. Fungus by the Samoans,' by the Rev. Thos. Powell. Specimens of the fungus had been forwarded to the Rev. Mr. Berkeley for identification. The natives give the name "Limamea" to it. It destroys then- Bread-fruit trees and the Chesnut {Inocarpus edulis), though not confined to them. They believe that an antidote to its ravages exists in the liliaceoLus plant, Crinwii asiaticum, which they plant between the trees liable to be afiected. April 18. — Dr. J. Gwyn Jeffreys, F.R.S., Vice-President, in the chair. — The following gentlemen were elected Fellows of the Society :— Rev. A. A. Harland, M.A. ; Rev. J.J. Muir, M.A. ; W. G. Piper, Esq. ; and Frederick Townseiid, Esq., M.A. — The following botanical paper was read : — ' On the Mechanism for the Fertilization oi Meijenia erecta, Benth.,' by R. Irwin Lynch. This West African Acanthaceous shrub has a funnel-shaped corolla, with hauy anthers midway in the tube, then- backs pressed against the wall. The longer, slender, flexible style has its double- lipped stigma so formed and i^laced that pollen, to be effective, must touch the tubular lip. Insects, alighting and entering towards the nectar at the bottom of the flower, on their retui-n so move the lever-lip of the stigma as to produce XDollenization. 2Iar/ 2. — W. B. Carpenter, F.R.S., Vice-President, in the chair. — The following gentlemen were elected Fellows of the Society : — M. Cesar Chambre, Broad Street, City; and Thos. Comber, Esq., Redcliffe, Newton-le-Willows, Lancashire. The Foreign Members elected by ballot to fill the vacancies of those deceased during last year were : — Teodoro Caruel, Professor of Botany and Director of the Botanic Garden, Pisa ; Dr. Ernest Cosson, of Paris ; Dr. George Engelmann, of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.; Dr. Edouard Fenzl, Professor of Botany at the University and Director of the Botanic Garden at Vienna ; and Dr. Julius Sachs, Professor of Botany at the University and Director of the Botanic Gardens, Wiirzburg. — Mr. John R. Jackson exhibited a series of dried mounted speci- mens illustrating the peculiarities of Yucca haccata, Torrey. These were the fruits, leaves, and portions of the stem ; the latter used as a substitute for soap by the inhabitants of Mexico. The plant in question extends from Southern Colorado far into Mexico. In the north it is acaulescent ; southward it forms a trunk up to ten feet high. The fruit, which in the other Yuccas is ca^DSular, is here a dark purple berr3^ It is eaten when fresh, both by Whites and Indians, and cured by the latter for winter provision. The plant is sometimes called the Rocky Mountain Banana (see Engelmann's Monograph of the genus). — The following papers were read : — * On Manqx't, a genus of the SiiuaruhacciE,' by John Miers, Esq., F.R.S. This genus is founded upon a curious fruit observed by the author in the Brazilian productions contributed to the Paris Exhibition of 1857, partly under his charge, and ticketed ' Marupd on Simraroiiba.' In the same collection was also a specimen of wood, likewise from Para, named ' Marupd ou Pdo Pomho.' The fruit in question offers a resemblance to that of Samadera indica, described and figured by Gaertner, though a trifle smaller, but they differ in their external covering : in Gaertner's PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 191 specimen the fruit has a very thick, soHd, homogeneous, integral pericarj) ; while in Marujui this is equally thick, but disintegral, consisting of three distinct parts, the outer one or pericarp being translucent, pergamineous, bladder-like, the inner one or endocarp being thin and membranaceous, while the intermediate copious mesocarp is mucilaginous ; it contains a single seed or XDutamen, like that figured by Gaertner. In 1866 Sign or Netto described a Brazilian plant under the designation of Odina Francoana, and bearing the vernacular name of ' Pao Pombo ' : this is considered by the author as congeneric with Netto's species, which cannot belong to Odina, as that genus is Anacardiaceous, and quite foreign to the American Continent. Netto's plant bears many small male monoecious flowers, the structure of which conforms with that originall}^ defined by St. Hiliare as characteristic of the SimaruhacecB. The author concludes with a short diagnosis of the two species, which are severally illustrated by analytical drawings.-'- — ' On the Seed-structm-e and Germination of a Species of PacJnra,' by Mr. E. Ii'win Lynch. The seeds were received at Kew in July, 1877, labelled the 'Provision Tree.' They vary in size and form, are without albumen, and consist in bulk of but one fleshy, lobed cotyledon, the second being exceedingly diminutive and apparently functionless. Germination takes place in about a fortnight after sowing, and in one case observed the large per- sistent cotyledon did not appear to be exhausted for nearly six mouths. — ' On the Occurrence of Conidial Fructification in the Mucorini, illustrated by Choanephora,' by Dr. D. D. Cunningham, F.L.S. This paper is designed to show that this fungus, the Cunni'ughamia infundihuUfera, Currey * Jour. Linn. Soc' xiii. p. 333, in place of being a member of the Mucedines, belongs to the Mucorini ; and that De Bary's suggested analogy between the Mucorini and Ascomycetes, in respect of their fructification, is well founded, although the observations which originally suggested it have since been shown to be fallacious. The investigation of Choanephora has been carried on for some years as opportunity has permitted. Its presence on plants certainly accelerates decay greatly, but it is a cause, not a consequence, of advanced putrefaction. The author proceeds to describe in detail the various featm-es and points of importance, and the following is given us as an abstract of the results at which he believes he has arrived. The results of study of the plant under normal conditions show that it possesses a mycelium and sexual reproductive a^^paratus of the recognised Mucorine type, but that the asexual fructification, in place of being sporangial, is of a truly conidial nature. Under other special conditions of nutrition and media employed, however, sporangial and chlamydosporous forms of fructification obtain. That the former of these two really belongs to the same plant as the zygo- spores and conidial forms is grounded on the following reasons : — 1. Conidia have given a mycehum producing such s23orangia. 2. Spores from a sporangium have developed a mycelium bearing ♦ On this genub see ' Jouru. Bot.,' 1878, p. 258. 192 BOTANICAL NEWS. the conidial form of fructification. 3. Sporangial filaments have been traced to the same mycehal tubes as conidiiferous ones. 4. Conditions securing the development of sporangial filaments on a mycelium produced from conidia have been in a great degree determined. 5. Prepared Hibiscus decoction exposed to the au* may develoj)e various moulds, but none producing such sporangia, save when ( 'hoanephora conidia have been introduced. Chlamy- dosporous fructification, again, is very rare. According to the detailed observations, then, Chuanephora is a genus of Mucorme Fungi, capable of producing four kinds of fructification, as follows : — I. Sexual Fructification . Zygospores. (Conidia. Sporangial spores. Chlamydophorous spores. These phenomena aftbrd a possible explanation of certain other- wise conflicting conclusions which have been arrived at by such thoroughly competent observers as Brefeld, Van Tieghem, and Le Monnier. At all events it yields a note of warning that classification of fungal organisms, based alone on one form of fructification, mav lead to false conclusions. Botantcal Nttos< Among the recently elected Fellow^s of the Eoyal Society bota- nists will see with great satisfaction the name of Mr. J. Gr. Baker ; a worthy recipient in all respects. Mr. William Hillhouse, of Trinity College, author of ' Con- tributions towards a new Flora of Bedfordshire, 1875,' and ' Bedfordshire Plant-List for 1876,' has been appointed Assistant Curator of the Cambridge Herbarium. Mr. W. Thiselton Dyer has been elected one of the Exammers in Botany in the University of London. We have to record the death of Roberto de VislalNi, which occurred ou May 4tli, at the age of 77. He had been Professor of Botany and Director of the Botanic Garden at Padua for very many years, and his writings extend over a long period, com- mencing, in 1826, with the ' Stirpium Dalmaticarum Specimen.' The Dalmatian flora much occupied him ; his ' Flora Dalmatica ' was published in three vols., with another of plates in 1842-53, and Suj)plements have appeared in 1872 and as recently as last year, 1877. Visiani also wrote on the plants of Egypt, of Greece and of Servia, and was the author of many jmpers in various departments of Botany in the Italian scientific Joiuiials. DeCan- dolle gave the name Visiania to a genus of Oleacece hi 1844, and Gasparrini to one of Ficea:. in the same year, but neither have been maintained. ©rtstnal ^xtitltB ON THE NEW AMARYLLIDACE.^ OF THE WELWITSCH AND SCHWEINFUETH EXPEDITIONS. By J. G. Baker, F.K.S. (Tab. 197.) The following are the new Amaryllidacece contained in the sets I have seen of the plants gathered by Dr. Welwitsch in Angola, and Dr. Schweinfnrth in Central Afiica. Type specimens of all of the former may be seen at the British Museum, and of the latter at Kew. Cryptostephanus, Welw. MSS., (jenus novum. Perianth narrowly funnel-shaped, the permanently ascending oblong - lanceolate segments half as long as the more or less curved tube. Anthers six, small, oblong, nearly sessile in a single series at the middle of the perianth-tube. Staminodia twelve, linear, two inserted at the base of each segment of the perianth, where they unite, running down the tube as an adnate strap-shaped j)rocess, from the middle of which the anther sx3rings. Ovary inferior, three-celled ; ovules several in a cell, axile, horizontal, superposed. Style short, erect, cylindrical. Stigma peltate, placed on the same level as the anthers. Fruit a globose scarlet berry. Seeds one to two in a cell, turgid, not seen fully mature. C. DENSiFLORus, Welw. MSS. Eoot-stock a " compact bulb- tuber." Leaves six to eight, cotemporary with the flowers, lorate, glaucescent, glabrous, moderately firm in texture, finally a foot long, three-eighths to half an inch broad. ScajDe central, mode- rately stout, compressed, ancipitous, six to eight inches long. Bracts in a whorl, as in Hamanthus, unequal, lanceolate, greenish, membranous, an inch long. Flowers, twenty to thu'ty or more, in a dense globose head; pedicels very short. Ovary green, round- oblong, one- sixth of an inch long. Limb dark-purple, more or less curved, under half an inch long ; curved tube a quarter of an inch ; segments one -eighth of an inch, slightly cucullate at the tip. Staminodia more than half as long as the perianth-segments. Anthers under a line long. Berry the size of a pea (about three- eighths of an inch diameter), bright scarlet. [Tab. 197] . Huilla, in bushy x)laces, in di-y, sandy soil near Lopollo, in the temperate region (3800-5500 feet), flowering in October and November, fruiting in January, Wehvitsch, 4027! This is certainly the most interesting new plant amongst all the hundred and twenty new bulbs which Dr. Welwitsch discovered* in his Angolan expedition. Not to go beyond the N. s. VOL 7. [July, 1878.] 2 c 194 NEW AMARYLLIDACE^. order for a comparison, tlie general habit is most like that of a small Cyrtanthm, the narrowly funnel-shaped tube of the perianth being quite similar, and, as in that genus, curving more in the outer flowers of the umbel ; but the structure is totally different from that of any Amaryllid already known. By its corona, distinctly exterior to the whorl of stamens proper, the genus to whicli it approximates most of all is Xarcissiis. Here the staminodia palpably represent an outer whorl of stamens, for, as Dr. Welwitsch has noted and one of his specimens shows, they casually bear a small abortive anther at the tip. The alliance, both in habit and structure, is very close with TulhagJiia, in Liliacea, a genus the range of which Dr. Welwitsch found to extend from the Cape to Angola, and a new species, which Lieut. Caimeron has lately discovered on the shores of Lake Tanganika. In TuJharfhia, however, the fruit is capsular, whilst here it closely resembles that of Hannanthus. It is scarcely needful for me to explain that here, as in other cases, these descriptions are greatly indebted for their completeness to the careful notes which Dr. "Welwitsch made from the living specimens. HyEMANTHUs (Nerissa) angolensis, Welw. MSS., n.'sp. Bulb nar- row, with a long neck ; outer sheaths spotted with pm-ple. Leaves developed on a special stem, as in H. multiflorus and abyssiniciis, produced after the flowers ; fully- developed channelled petioles six to nme inches long; lamina thin, oblong, acute, abruptly narrowed at the base, nine to twelve inches long, three to four inches broad ; central main veins one-sixth to one-eighth of an inch apart; obhque cross-bars about half a line apart. Scape lateral, six to eight inches long. Umbel three to four inches in diameter, not so densen or so many-flowered as m multiflorus and ahyssinicus. Bracts many, linear, reddish ; pedicels three-quarters to an inch long. Ovary globose, perianth bright red ; tube cylindrical, one -third of an inch long ; segments linear, three-quarters of an inch long. Filaments rather longer than the perianth-segments. Anthers yellow, oblong, under a line long. Golungo Alto, in primaeval woods, 1000-2400 feet, flowering in February, Wehritsch, 4008 ! The species of this section of Hcemanthm have rapidly increased lately. There are two in Kunth, and another has been in cultivation several years. I described three new ones, not long ago, in the ' Gardeners' Chronicle.' We have now two more in cultivation at Kew, of which plates will be given in the ' Botanical Magazine ;' and now here are two others, raising the total number to ten. This group is almost endemic in Tropical Africa, only one of the species reachmg into Natal. H^MANTHUs (Nerissa) filiflorus, Hiern MSS., n. sp. Leaves five to six, as in the last, produced on a special stem about a foot long, which is developed after the flowers ; sheathing petiole not more than tw^o to three inches long ; lamina thin, oblong, finally a foot long by half a foot broad ; central veins three-eighths to half an inch apart ; oblique cross-bars much closer than in NEW AMARYLLIDACE^. 195 H. angolensis, not more than a quarter of a line apart. Scape lateral, under a foot long, much spotted with purple. Umbel as dense as in H. multiflorus, five to six inches in diameter. Bracts unequal, reflexing, linear and lanceolate, reddish, an inch and a half to two inches long ; pedicels an inch to an inch and a quarter long. Ovary globose. Perianth bright red ; tube cylindrical, a quarter of an inch long ; segments linear-subulate, twice as long as the tube. Filaments longer than the segments. Anthers oblong, yellow, three-quarters of a line long. Pungo Andongo, flowering in October, Welwitsch, 4009 ! 4010 ! Closely allied to the old Sierra Leone H. multijiorus, from which it differs in leaf-veining and by its much smaller flowers, with very narrow segments. Crinum ammocharoides, Baker, n. sp. Bulb globose, three to four inches in diameter, with brown membranous tunics, and a short neck. Leaves six to eight, lorate, probably distichous, cihated, six to nine inches long at the flowering-time, an inch broad. Scape stout, lateral, not more than three to four inches long. Umbels eight to twelve-flowered ; outer spathe-valves lan- ceolate, greenish, an inch and a half to two inches long; pedicels a quarter to half an inch long. Ovary oblong, a quarter to one- third of an inch long. Tube cylindi-ical, four to five inches long ; segments red, linear, rotate, two and a half to three inches long. Filaments as long as the segments. Anthers linear, versatile, yellow, a quarter of an inch long. Style longer than the perianth- segments, declinate ; stigma entn-e. North Central Africa, SchwemfuTth, 1370 ! 1787 ! Series iii., No. 208 ! A very distinct plant, connecting the Crinums of the asiaticum group with Buphcme. The leaves closely resemble those of Nerine [Ammocharis) falcata and its variety coranica. Crinum pauciflorum. Baker, n. sp. Bulb globose, about three inches in a diameter ; tunics brown, membranous. Leaves five to six, linear, subcoriaceous, fifteen to eighteen inches long, a quarter of an inch broad; margin entire. Scape two to three inches long, one to two-flowered. Bract single, two to three inches long, tubular in the lower half, greenish, the free point linear. Ovary oblong, nearly sessile ; ovules many, superposed. Tube curved, four inches long ; segments ascending, oblong, acute, three inches long, an inch broad at the middle, white, with a distinct red central band outside. Filaments declinate, two-thirds as long as the perianth-segments. Anthers linear-oblong, a quarter of an inch long. Style declinate ^ falling about an inch short of the perianth- segments. North Central Africa, m the Kingdom of Djur, Schiveinfurth, 1975 ! Closely allied to C. Broussonetii and C. clisticlium, both of which mhabit the same region. Crinum buphanoides, Wehv. MSS., n. sp. " Bulb the size of a child's head." Leaves lanceolate, glaucous, firm in texture, undulated, gradually narrowed to an acute point, fifteen to eighteen 196 NEW AMAEYLLIDACE^. inches long, two to two and a half inclies broad, closely veined, ciliated with distinct linear scales half a line long. Flowers thirty to forty or more in an umbel, white, with a distinct keel of red down the back of the segments ; outer bracts large, greenish, deltoid ; pedicels a half to three-quarters of an inch long. Ovary oblong ; tube three and a half to four inches long ; segments lanceolate, two to two and a half inches long, a quarter of an inch broad. Filaments as long as the x^erianth- segments. Anthers a quarter of an inch long. Style red, longer than the perianth- segments. Puugo Andongo, in sandy woods, at 2400-3800 feet, flowering in October, Welwitsch, 4014 ! General habit of C. latifolium, from which it differs by its narrow perianth- segments and distinctly scale-ciliated leaves of firm texture. Crinum vanillodorum, Wehv. MSS., n. sp. ''Bulb columnar, the size of a child's head." Leaves s^Dreading, bright green, lanceolate, two to three feet long, two to two and a half inches broad at the middle, narrowed from the middle towards the base and an acute point, entire, and not at all ciliated at the edge, the main veins distant for the genus and connected by distinct cross- bars. Scape two to four feet long, three to six-flowered ; outer bracts lanceolate, two and a half to three inches long. Ovary oblong, sessile. Perianth-tube curved, five to six inches long ; segments of the limb oblong, pure white, not at all keeled with red, only the three outer faintly marked with green, about three inches long by an inch broad. Filaments white, declinate, falling about an inch short of the perianth- segments. Anthers linear, three- quarters of an inch long. Style reaching to the tip of the perianth-segments. Golungo Alto, 1000-2400 feet, flowering in November, Wel- ivitsch, 4020 ! 4021 ! Closely allied to the well-known C. giganteum, Andr., of Sierra Leone. The name refers to the scent of the flowers. Crinum fimbriatulum, Baker, n. sp. Leaves linear, two to five feet long, an inch broad at the base, tapering gradually to the point, glaucous green, deei)ly channelled down the face, minutely scale -ciliated at the edge ; veins close, distinct. Scape two feet long, three to seven-flowered ; outer bracts lanceolate, two to two and a half inclies long. Ovary nearly sessile. Perianth-tube curved, four to five inches long ; segments of the limb oblong, ascending, white, with a distinct red keel, two and a half inches long, an inch broad. Filaments declinate, falling about an inch short of the segments of the perianth. Anthers linear, three- eighths to half an inch long. Style about reaching to the tip of the perianth-segments. Loanda, in meadows, at a low level (under 1000 feet), inundated in summer, flowering in March, Welwitsch, 4018 ! 4019 ! Of described species, comes near C. Bruussonetiiy Herb. [C. yucccBjiorumy Salisb.) ) Tal3. DBlairPL S. dbeletlitK. MmtemBro? imp Cpyptosteplianiis densifloi'us, We/w. NEW AMARYLLIDACE^. 197 BupHANE ANGOLENsis, Baker, n. sp. Bulb large, ovoid; tunics firm, brown. Leaves about six to a stem, lorate, bifarious, curved and adpressed to the ground, six to eight inches long, half to three- quarters of an inch broad, glaucous, fimbriato-ciliate. Scape stout, lateral, not more than one to two inches long ; umbel six to eight- flowered ; outer bracts lanceolate, one and a half to two inches long ; pedicels very short. Flowers dull red. Ovary small, oblong. Perianth-tube cylindrical, two inches long ; segments spreading, oblanceolate, obtuse, about an inch long. Filaments inserted at the throat of the tube, a quarter of an inch long. Anthers oblong, one-eighth of an inch long. Huilla, in bushy, dampish pastures of the sub-temperate region (3800-5500 feet), flowering in October, Welivitsch, 4012! Very different from the two Cape species already known. Dr. Welwitsch found B. toxicaria in several provinces of Angola, and Lieutenant Cameron got it on the shores of Lake Tanganika. Cyrtanthus (Monella) WELWiTscmi, Hiern MSS., n. sp. Bulb ovoid, an inch in diameter. Leaves about four, cotemporary with the flowers, fleshy, linear, glabrous, glaucous, one to one and a half feet long, a quarter to one-third of an inch broad. Scape slender, as long as the leaves. Umbel three to eight-flowered ; outer bracts linear, one and a half to two inches long ; bracteoles subulate ; pedicels one to two inches long. Ovary oblong, a quarter of an inch long ; perianth red, one to one and a half inches long ; segments linear, about as long as the more or less curved narrowly funnel-shaped tube. Stamens a little exserted from the perianth- tube, distinctly biseriate ; anthers yellow, oblong, a line long. Style overtopping the anthers, with three spreading subulate branches. Capsiile oblong, three-quarters of an inch long, tkree- valved down to the base. Seeds in a long row in each cell, oblique, discoid, black, half an inch long, a quarter of an inch broad. Huilla, m damp places of the sub-temperate region (3800- 5500 feet), in company with Typha and Bichardia, flowering in November, Welwitsch, 4028 ! General habit of the well-known C. angustifolius. Ait., of the Cape, from which it differs by the perianth- segments reaching half-way down to the ovaiy. ExPLAHATiON OF Tab. 197. — Fig. 1. Cryptostephamis densifloriis, Welw. 2. Longitudinal section of flower (enlarged.) 3. Transverse section of ovary (enlarged.) 4. Cluster of fruit (natural size.) 5. Vertical section of berry (natural size.) 198 ON SOME NEW MALAYAN CORYLACE.E. ON SOME NEW MALAYAN CORYLACEJE. By H. F. Hance, Ph.D., Member of the Royal Botanic Societies of Eatisboii and Belgium, &c. In the summer of 1876, Dr. Scheffer was so kind as to send me, from the rich herbarium of Buitenzorg, a number of specimens of Malayan Coryhicea', almost all unnan^ed, but many very rare and- valuable, wath full permission to describe such as I might consider new. A.fter a patient examination and comparison of all these, I selected the following as being undescribed ; and as a testimony to the care I bestowed on their study, I may say that Dr. Sche£fer, to whom I communicated my views, has signified his assent, not only as to the species being new, but also in regard to the systematic position I have assigned each, except in the case of Quercus rhioensis, which, from my omission to indicate it by its number, he did not identify. The species described all belong to Miquel's * Sumatran province,' or Wallace's • In do -Malayan region' of the Archipelago. 1. Quercus (^Cyclobakmus, Eucydohalanus) Rajah, s/j. nov. — Ramis angulatis tenuiter tomentellis demum glabratis, foliis coriaceis ovalibus v. ovali-oblongis margine integerrimis basi in petiolum 3-4 linealem cuneato-angustatis apice rotundatis subitoque breviter lineari-rostratis supra glabris lucidulis subtus opacis tomentoque squamoso-furfuraceo denso gilvo v. pallenti obtectis costa satis crassa supra elevata costulis ad utrumque latus cu'citer 10 sub angulo 50° egressis utrinque paululum prominentibus intra marginem obscure anastomosantibus 5-7 poll, longis 2^-3 poll, latis, fructibus secus pedunculum validum folio parum breviorem confertim sed singulatim dispositis sessihbus, cupulas patelliformis 7 lin. diametro extus glabratae intus centro pulvinatim elevatse zonis concentricis 4 indistinctis integris, glandibus obovoideo- hemisphaericis dilute brunneis basi excavata pallida tomento brevi sericeo griseo plus minus persistenti tectis 9 hn. altis 10 lin. diametro columna stylina apiculatis. Ex archipelago Malayano. (Herb. hort. Bogor., n. 11484.) Nearest the Bangka Q. Miqiieliana, Scheff. ! in Dr. Scheffer's oiDinion, in which I entu-ely concur. It is, however, perfectly well distmguished by the shape and colour of the leaves, their stouter costules, the sessile fruits, less numerous and distinct entu-e-edged cup-scales, and by the much paler tomentose acoms. 2. Quercus (Pasaiiia, Eupasania) RmoENSis, sp. nor. — Ramis angulatis glabris lenticellatis, foliis coriaceis a basi cuneata elliptico- oblongis breviter acuminatis integerrimis glaberrimis costulis utrinque circ. 12 tenuibus angulo cu'C. 60^ egressis supra impressis subtus elevatis, fructibus secus pedunculos canescentes terminales ssepius fasciculatos folia subduplo superantes ternatim aggregatis, cupulis cupuliformibus 5 lineas diametro canescentibus intus cano- sericeis squamis distinctis adpressis, glandibus glandaceis lucidis ovoideis acuminatis 6 lin. diametro 5-6 lin. altis. ON SOME NEW MALAYAN CORYLACE^. 199 Circa Ehio, sen Eionw, ins. Bintang, archipelagi Malayani, ad orientem ins. Singapur sitae, legit cl. Teijsmann. " (Herb. hort. Bogor, n. 11452.) In foliage this is absolutely indistinguishable from Q. spicata, Sm., a very variable species, as any one who will refer to plates 1 to 4 of Oudeman's " Annotationes criticae in Cupuliferas nonnuUas javanicas" may see. I therefore at first felt disposed to regard it as merely a sub-species, or very distinct variety. But, after renewed examination, I am bound to say that, amongst a most extensive set of specimens of Q. spicata, from the continent of India, Java, Sumatra, Penang, and a very large number of the smaller and less-known islands of the Malay archixoelago, which I have been enabled to compare, I have seen none at all with small and very acute acorns like those of the Ehio tree, which are indeed more like those of Q. Hancd, Benth. I therefore believe that it must be specifically distinguished. I may here note that an Indian oak, Q. Andersoni, G. King, has recently, through some misapx)rehension, been stated by C. B. Clarke* as having been named by Sir Joseph Hooker. It was, however, found amongst the Sikkim collections of the late Dr. Thomas Anderson by Dr. King, the present director of the Calcutta Garden, who dedicated it to his deceased friend ; and a paper regarding it, by Dr. King, was read before the Linnean Society on the 20th January, 1876, as mentioned at page 92 of the volume of this journal for the same year. Dr. Hooker had, in writing to Dr. King, observed that it was "very near to, if not identical with Q. dealhata, Hook. f. and Th. !" Dr. King, who had kindly sent me a specimen, and who himself stationed it next Q. spicata, being unable to concur in this opinion, asked mine. I replied, as I still think, that in my judgment its nearest allies are Q. Irwmii, Hance, and Q. fenestrata, Eoxb. ! assuredly it is very distinct from Q. dealhata. 3. QuERCus (Pasania, Eiipasania) scyphigera, sp. 7ior. — Eamis adultis glabris, ramulis ferrugineo-tomentosis, foliis coriaceis oblongis margine integerrimis basi obtusis apice obtuse acuminatis adultis glabris utrinque opacis junioribus subtus praecipue in costa venisque parce ochiaceo-tomentosis costulis utrinque 9-11 sub angulo 52° egressis tenuibus sed conspicuis subtus cum costa crassiuscula elevatis ante marginem sursum curvatis ac sensim evanescentibus 7-10 poll, longis 2-4 poll, latis petiolo 3-4 lineali ; fructibus secus pedunculum gracilem folio longiorem solitariis y. geminatis pedicello crasso 2-3 lineali impositis, cupulae hemi- sphaericae 6-7 lin. altae cinerascentis glabratse margine integerrim^ tenuis nigricantis intus basi rugosfe excavatae squamulis 6-7 seriatis omnino inter se coalitis denticulos tantum minutos exhibentibus, glande semipoUicari ovoidea acutiuscula castanea apice tenuiter sericea. In insula Bangka legit Teijsmann (Herb. hort. Bogor, n. 11403.) The nearest allies of this species are Q. hayicana, Scheff. ! and * ' Journ. Linn. Soc.,' xv., 125. 200 ON SOME NEW MALAYAN CORYLACEiE. Q. Amherstiana, Wall. ! between which it should be stationed. The cup-scales are a good deal like those of the first-named species, the foliage approaches that of the second, but both cup and acorn are considerably smaller than m either, and the latter of a much deeper hue. 0 4. Castanopsis (Callaocarpus) mitifica, sp. nov. — Ramulis sub- teretibus purpurascentibus glaberrimis, foliis coriaceis oblongis integerrimis basi cuneatis apice obtusis Q-Q^ poll, longis inch petiolo semipollicari 2 poll, latis supra glaberrimis lucidulis subtus subopacis subargenteo-rufescentibus squamulis minutis albidis H oculo fortius armato tantum conspicuis densissime obsitis subtiliter sed vix prominulo-reticulatis costulis in utroque latere cu'c. 12 tenuibus sub angulo 50° egressis marginem versus arcuatis subtus cum costa elevatis, fructibus pluribus secus ramum vahdum dense aggregatis,involucro abbreviato-piriformi v. obscrotiformi lateraliter compresso altero latere convexiusculo altero leviter sulcato crasse breviterque stipitato cinereo-tomentello pollicem alto latitudine majore 11-13 mmore 8-9 lineali, ^ lin. crasso apice acervulis 4 cruciatim dispositis spinularum prismaticarum ^ lin. tantum longarum aucto zonulaque spinularum similium suj)ra medium alteraque saepissime fere obliterata juxta medium angulos 4 rotun- datos involucri semich-culariter circumdantibus concavitate sursum spectante pr^edito stigmatibus e vertice breviter protrusis, nucibus 3 castaniformibus duabus ^quimagnis plano-convexis extremitates involucri occuxjantibus tertia minore trigona inter eas ad latus involucri convexmsculum cuneatim adfixa praeter apicem tomen- tellum glaberrimis lucidis badiis hilo carpico opaco albido ruguloso trientem fere superficiei occupante pericarpio ligneo \ lin. crasso, cotyledonibus ? In insula Lingga, ad oram orientalem ins. Sumatra, coll. Teijsmann. (Herb. hort. Bogor, n. 11457.) Evidently very closely allied to C. smnatrana, A. DC, my specimens of which are, I regret to say, imperfect and inadequate for a proper comparison. It apx^ears, however, to differ by the leaves bemg more lepidote beneath, by the peculiar shape of the involucre, the arrangement of the tubercles, and by the manner in which the perfectly smooth nuts are packed in the involucre, which I find invariable, and indicated indeed externally. Though out- wardly uninjured, the nuts were destroyed within, so that I could not, unfortunately, determine the cotyledonar structure. 5. Castanopsis [Callwocarpus) Schefferiana, sp. 7iov. — Ramulis teretibus cinereis glaberrimis, foliis rigide coriaceis glaberrimis lanceolato-ellipticis integerrimis acuminatis 3-3^ poll, longis 15-18 lin. latis in petiolum 9-linealem cuneato-attenuatis supra nitidissimis subtus parum lucidis rufescentibus rete venularum subtili sed vix prominulo costulis tenuibus ad utrumque latus 8-10 sub angulo circ. 50° egressis arcuatis ante marginem deliquescen- tibus, fructibus pluribus secus ramum validum sessilibus approxi- matis, involucro depresso subgloboso 14-18 lin. diametro lineam crasso cinereo-velutino zonis 5-6 approximatis transversis curvulis ON SOME NEW MALAYAN CORTLACE^. 201 continuis processicum prismaticorum 2 lin. altorum basi coii- fluentiiiin sursum deorsiimque curvatoruin aj)ice in spiiiam rigidam calvam nitidam desiueutium imdique obsessis stylis ex ipsuis apice breviter exsertis maturitate 3-4 valvi, nucibus tribns uno reliquis multo majore mutua pressione ovoideo-comj)lanatis dense fulvo- hii'sutis hilo carpico trientem superficiei occuiDante ruguloso brunneo glaberrimo, pericarx^io osseo, cotyledonibns ? In ins. Lingga coll. Teijsmann. (Herb, liort. Bogor, n. 11441.) Most nearly allied to C. rhamnifolia, Miq., but differs by its more rigid foliage, the shape of its involucre, the distinct zonate arrangement of the processes terminating in sharp smooth prickles, and the three nuts. 6. QuERcus DiscocARPA, Hauce. — Fine specimens of this, com- municated under nos. 3629, 11447, and 11486, hb. Bogor., enable me slightly to correct the diagnosis as follows : — Aculeis saepe 3-4 lin. longis acicularibus refractis, glande -matura cum cupula non connata. Unfortunately, not one of the fruit I have opened has enabled me to ascertain the cotyledonar structure. But, as I now know the species, I believe it must certainly be placed amongst the Castanopses, near C. ecliidnocarpa, rather than amongst the Pasania, Chlamijdobalani, where it has hitherto lain in my herbarium. So long, therefore, as the genus Castanojms is admitted, the species must figure as C. discocarpa. On this subject, I am' gratified to observe a growing disposition on the part of those writers who have good opx3ortunities of studying Asiatic Corylacece to concur in the view I have long advocated as to the reunion of both Castanea and Castanopsis with Quercus. Mr. Kurz some time ago wrote : — " The differences between these genera are simply artificial ones:"* and, in a letter I received from Dr. Scheffer, he observes, — " Du reste, j'accepte pleinement votre opinion que Castanojms, Castanea, et CallcEocarjms doivent etre fondus avec Quercus.'' Latest of all, one of the most industrious and original of hving botanists, — Pro- fessor Baillon, — than whom there are few if any less disposed " jurare in verba magistri," remarks, in his recent revision of the genera of the family, "Les chenes peuvent a peine se distinguer generiquement des chataigniers ;"f and, whilst he unhesitatingly reduces Castanopsis to Castanea, in his list of genera he puts a mark of interrogation before the latter. It is strange that M. Baillon should have made no reference to the very imx^ortant investigations of Oersted. * ' Jouru. As. Soc. Bengal,' xliv., ly^. + ' Hort. des Plantes,' vi., 230. 2d 202 ON THE STKUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF CHARACE.E. ON THE STRUCTUEE AND AFFINITIES OF CHAR ACE. E. By Alfred W. Bennett, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. The position of the order Characece in the natural system has been one of the most fruitful subjects of discussion among crypto- gamic botanists. Forming by themselves a small and perfectly natural group, their affinity is obviously not close with any other family of Cryptogams. Placed by Linnaeus first of all among AlfjiB, and afterwards transferred to a position among flowering plants, they were treated by most of the botanists who succeeded him as Phanerogams. A. L. de Jussieu considered them as mono- cotyledonous Phanerogams, referring them to Naiades, as Robert Brown did to Hijdrocharidecc ; while others have traced a fancied affinity, among dicotyledonous Phanerogams, to Haloragea {Mijrio- phyllum), or CeratopJnjUaceiB ; and Richard erected them into a separate order of flowering plants. Even to the present day the CharacecE find a place in some phanerogamic floras, enjoying that distinction along with Vascular Cryi)togams alone among flowerless plants ; but this is probably due rather to the small number of species than to any supposed genetic affinity. Agardli placed them among Confer vacece ; Brongniart among the highest Cryptogams, near to Filices and Marsileace(r, ;' Le Maout and Decaisne located them between Vascular Cryptogams and Muscinea ; Lindley regarded them as an order of the alliance Algals ; while Berkeley and the greater number of recent botanists treat them, under the name Charales, as forming a class by themselves intermediate between MuscincfE and Thallophytes. Caruel places them by themselves in the group Schistoganue, between Phanerogams and Vascular Cryptogams. Finally, in the 4th edition of his 'Lehrbuch,' Sachs again degrades them into a family of Carposporea, the highest class of Thallophytes. From a conviction that this location arises from a mistaken view of certain points of structure, I am desirous of laying the following considerations before the readers of the * Journal of Botany.' The most complete records of original observations on the structure of the OharacecR are the following: — Thuret, '* Sur les Antheridies des Cryptogames," in ' Annales des Sciences Naturelles,' vol. xvi., 1851, p.'lB ; Montague, "Multiplication des charagnes par division," 'Ann. des Sci. Nat.,' vol. xviii., 1852, p. 65; Nordstedt, "Nagra iakttagelser ofver Characeernas groning," in ' Lunds Univ. Arsskrift,' vol. ii. ; Priugsheim, " Ueber die Vor- keime und die nacktfilssigen Zweige der Charen," in ' Jahrbuch fiir wissenschaftlichen Botanik, vol. iii., 1863, p. 294; Wahlstedt, '*0n Characeernas Knoppar och ofvervintring," Lund, 1864; A. Braun, "Conspectus Systematicus Characearum Euroiiearum,' 1867 ; and De Bary, " Zur Keimungsgeschichte der Charen," in ' Botanische Zeitung,' 1875, p. 377 et set], (translated with illustra- tions in ' Journal of Botany,' 1875, p. 298.) I am, however, acquainted with the two Swedish memoirs only through De Bary's paper. ON THE STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF CHARACE.E. 203 In all recent systems of cryx^togamic classification the greatest stress is justly laid on the structure of the reproductive organs ; still it is impossible to neglect altogether the characters drawn from the vegetative organs. Indeed the primary classification of the vegetable kingdom into Thallophytes and Cormophytes depends wholly on characters of this kind. Now if we admit any ^Drimary classification of this nature, it is hardly open to doubt that the Characece must be placed distinctly, not in the lower, but in the upper of the two divisions. Lindley, while locating CharacecR among Thallogens, points out that " in them only do we find a symmetrical arrangement even of the divisions of the axis ;" while even in the 4th edition of his ' Lehrbuch/ in which he places Chara among Thallophytes, Sachs still (p. 155) uses this genus as one of his typical illustrations of the formation of " leaves and leaf- forming axes." The more closely we examine the structure of the stem and branches of Chara, the more do we see how widely it diverges from anything that occurs among true Thallophytes ; the stem forming a distinct axis, divided into definite nodes and internodes, and growing by an apical bud. In fact the poly- sjmimetrical arrangement of the branches reminds one much more closely of Phanerogams than of even the highest AlgcB. Even the spurious cortication * of certain FloridecB presents but little analogy to that of Chara. The assignment of Characea to the class of Thallophytes which Sachs calls Carpo&porem is hardly more fortunate, and seems to have been chosen mainly because in this class are included all the most higlily-organised Thallophytic forms. While admitting that the philosophic taxonomist will not insist too strongly on the invariability of even the most salient characters for the various groups, it is unfortunate that, in the most prominent characteristic of- the CarposporecE, Cliaracece are almost wholly deficient. This characteristic is thus described by Sachs ('Lehrbuch,' 4th ed., p. 287) : — " The common character of all plants belonging to this class, and that which distinguishes them from the Zygosporem and OosporecB, is the formation of a sporocarp, as the result of the impregnation of the female organ. This sporocarp consists, except in the simplest cases of all, of two essentially difierent parts, a fertile part, the immediate product of the female organ, and which produces eventually either a single or more usually a considerable number of carpospores, and an envelope or pericarp -- * which is not derived directly from the female organ. - * =^ In all cases the consequence of fertilisation is not merely the further develop- ment of a single female cell, as in the Zygosp)orecE, and Oospores, but the setting up of certain processes of growth * * * which results in the production of a body, the sporocarp) or fructification, consisting of a large mass of tissue." The sporocarp of the CarpospurecB is, m fact, strictly analogous to the pseudocarp among Phanerogams, and furnishes its most tyj)ical illustration in the * " Unachte Rinde," Cramer, Physiologisch-systematische Untersuchungen liber Cerainiaceen. Zurich, 1863. 204 ON THE STEUCTUKE AND AFFINITIES OF CHARACE.E. " cystocarp " of the FloridecB, and (iuferentially ) in the fructifica- tion or so-called "receiDtacle" of the Basidiomijcetes. In order to make room for the Characea among Carpospurecc, Sachs has been obliged to insert in the above extract an exception in then- case, where, he says, the processes of growth alluded to "do not go very far;" but even this guarded statement seems somewhat to overstep the mark. The cortex or enveloj)ing tubes of the "nucule" of Chara and Xitella are formed at an early period, and attain their full development before fertilisation, simply hardening afterwards into the black shell in which the germinating spore is invested. The location of Characca among Oospores would be equally for- bidden by many weighty considerations. If, therefore, we are compelled to exclude Characece altogether from the group of Thallophytes, the only alternatives left are to allow them to retam then- place as a distinct group co-ordinate with Thallophytes, Miiscinecc, and Vascular Cryptogams, or to place them among Miiscinea. The first of these alternatives has, as we have seen, the sanction of some high authorities ; but are there any sufficient reasons against the latter and simpler course ? The remarkable resemblance of the antherozoids to those of Mosses has been remarked by Thuret and others ; but it has appa- rently been thought that the assumption of genetic affinity is forbidden by other considerations connected with the reproductive organs, and by the external form of the nutritive portion of the plant. Too much stress should not, however, be laid on the latter consideration, since within Muscinea, itself we have the transition from the thalloid MarchantiecB to the frondose JungermanniecB and Musci ; and the objection can hardly be sustained by those who place Equisetacece and SelayinellecB within the same group, the Vascular Cryptogams, and Basidiomijcetes and Floridece even within the same class, the Carposporece. Among flowering plants it is admitted that the most abnormal development of the nutritive organs — adapting particular species or genera to live in exceptional ckcumstances, as in the case of Myrioplujllum, Cuscuta, and Lemna, — should not exclude them from location even in the same natural order with plants which are otherwise nearly allied to them. Scarcely any of the plants hitherto recognised as MuscijiecB are purely aquatic ; and if we imagine a cormoph}H:e destitute of vascular tissue gradually acquiring aquatic habits, the structure of Chara would be a very likely one for it to attain ; the polysymmetry of Characea: would aj)pear to result from analogous causes to the bilateral symmetry of Hepatica. In the Sphaynacece, which nearly apin'oach a true aquatic habit, we have a rudimentary cortication of the stem reminding one somewhat of that of Chara. On the other hand, the totally dissimilar structure, under somewhat similar conditions, of Characea from that of FloridecB or Fucacete, seems to indicate a wide genetic separation. One other point of resemblance may be noted between Characece and MuscinecB, viz., that of the so-called "pro-embryo" of Chara to the protonema of Mosses. But first of all, let me point out what seems to me a misuse of the term "pro-embryo " in crypto- ON THE STKtJCTUKE AND AFFINITIES OF CHARACEiE. 205 gamic termiiiology, arising in great measm-e from the unfortunate use of the corresponding term ''Voriceim" by Pringsheim and other German writers. Both etjanologically, and by homology with the pro-embryo or "suspensor" of Gymnosperms and Angiosperms, the use of the term should be confined to a structure intermediate between the act of impregnation and the formation of the multi- cellular embryo, such as appears to occur in SelaginellecE alone among flowerless j)lants. The so-called pro-embryo " (Vorkeim), on the contrary, of Mosses and Chara is a structure proceeding immediately from the spore, and anterior to the formation of the sexual organs. It is strictly homologous with the pro- thallium of Vascular Cryptogams ; the difference being only of secondary importance that in the latter the prothallium produces immediately the archegonia and antheridia, while in MuscinecB the leafy x^lant intervenes. If, however, the term prothallium is open to objection, there is none to the retention of protonema. A false analogy has even led some otherwise careful writers into the error of speaking of the " pro-embryo " and the leafy plant of Chara as exhibiting the two stages of an alternation of generations.! The phrase "alternation of generations" is, in fact, used with great vagueness by many cryptogamists. If we employ the term in its best accepted sense, as exhibited in Vascular Cryptogams, it simply describes the fact that the life-history of many plants can be divided into two distinct stages, separated by definite starting- points ( Wendungsi3unkte) ; these two points being the act of impregnation of the female by the male element, and the germina- tion in the soil of the spore produced non-sexually. The sexual generation consists of the stage intermediate between germination and impregnation ; the non- sexual generation of the stage inter- mediate between impregnation and germination. In this sense, the " pro-embryo " of Chara and the protonema of Mosses are both a part only of the sexual generation,! although even Sachs often speaks vaguely .of the protonema of Mosses "intervening" between the spore and the sexual generation. In both Characea and Mosses, the remainder of the sexual generation, or leafy plant, is produced on the protonema by lateral budding. The confusion to which I have just referred is no doubt increased by the extra- ordinary want of exactness in the use of the word "spore" by even some of the best writers on cryptogamic botany, — a practice which has thrown great confusion over many points of cryptogamic homology, and to which it is of the highest importance to attempt to put an end. Even Huxley and Martin § (' Course of Practical Instruction in Elementary Biology,' 4th edition, 1877) describe * I must confess to having myself sanctioned the confusion by .my rendei'ing of Vorkeim by "pro-embryo " in relation to Cryptogams in the translations both of Sachs's and of Thome's ' Lehrbuch.' + Kepeated by myself in my edition of Thome's ' Lehrbuch.' J This view |is confirmed by the fact that in Chara fragilis branches are produced from the nodes of the stem — called by Pringsheim '• pro-embryonic branches " (Zweigvork^ime) — altogether similar to the so-called " pro-embryo," § The same terminology is perpetuated in the 3rd edition (just published) of Henfrey's 'Elementary Course of Botany.' 206 ON THE STRUCTURE AND AFFINITIES OF CHARACE.E. the unimpregnated female organ of Chara — the homologue of the archegonium of the other higher Cryptogams — as a " sjDorangium." It would be possible also to draw other analogies between the modes of vegetative reproduction in Cliaraceff. and in Mosses. Into the structure of the reproductive organs (archegonia and antheridia, or nucules and globules) of CharacecB it is needless to enter in detail. Although ver}^ different in many non-essential points, there is no essential difference in the process of fertilisation in CharacecB on the one hand and in Muscinece and Vascular Crj^togams on the other hand. A female organ or carpogonium of somewhat complicated structure contains within it a cell, the contents of which constitute the "oosphere," while a more or less open channel leads down to this central cell from the apex of the carpogonium. Impregnation takes place by the coalescence with a hyaline portion of this oosphere, of antherozoids consisting of minute corkscrew-shaped threads of protoplasm, which escape from an antheridium of complicated structure ; the result being the development out of the fertilised germ- cell of a single *' oosi^ore," or rudimentary embryo. The most essential point in which CharacecB do exhibit a departure from all the higher Crj^^togams is the absence of any true alternation of generations. In none of the other MuscinecB, nor in Vascular Cryptogams, does the " oospore," or fertilised germ-cell, germinate in the soil and give rise immediately to a plant like the one which produced it, without the intervention of intermediate non- sexual germinating spores. If, however, we are justified — as I have attempted to show that we are — m considering the "pro-embryo" as an integral part of the sexual generation, this is the case with Chara. But this again would" seem to be determined by habit, a true alternation of generations being rare among aquatic plants. The so-called "spore " of CharacecB unites, in fact, the properties of an " oospore " produced by impregnation, and of a non-sexual " spore " capable of germination. To complete the cycle of generations, we should expect the oospore to develope into an intermediate structure, — the non-sexual generation, — the development of which would terminate with the production of germinating spores. May we not, then, regard the Characece as an abnormal form of Muscinece, — i. e., of Cellular Cormophytes, — aquatic in their habit, in which the formation of the non- sexual generation is altogether suppressed ? Since writing the above, my attention has been called to two recent papers relating to the structure and affinities of Characea. Trevisan, 'in his "Conspectus Ordinum Prothallophytarum " (' Bull. Bot. Soc. Belg., 1877, p. 4), includes in his second "region" of Anthoyaime the two sub-divisions of Bryophi/ta: and PhycophytcB, the first of which embraces Miisci and Hepaticce, the second Characece only. Celakovsky has a paper in ' Flora ' (1878, p. 49 et seg.), " Ueber die morphologische Bedeutung der sogenannten Sporensprosschen der Characcen,'' in which he objects to the use of NOTES ON EUBI. 207 this term applied by several German writers to the female organ of Chara, and contests the view of A. Braun and Sachs that the carpogonium must be regarded as a metamorphosed shoot. The " enclosed (behitUte) oogonium," as he prefers to term it, Celakovsky considers, on the contrary, to be a metamorphosed foliar structure or portion of a leaf, homologous to the ovule of Phanerogams. NOTES ON RUB I. (No. V.) By Charles C. Babington, F.E.S., &c. (Concluded from p. 178). 17. RuBUS GLANDULOsus, Bell. — By the kindness of Mr. Bagnall I possess specimens of a iDlant gathered by him on Bromsgrove Lickey, and supposed to belong to R. Koehleri var. infestus, which now seems to me to be a form of the aggregate R. glandulosus, api^roaching closely to R. rotundifolius, Blox., and also to R. dejie.videns, Boulay, but differing in some respects fi'om them. The shape of the terminal leaflet is different : it is much broader in its lower half, and much more cordate at the base. Two of these specimens have the dentition described by Boulay : " Les dents grandes et fortement refractees qui terminent les principales nervures des f. caulinaires." On Mr. Bagnall's plant they seem to be as remarkable as on Boulay's specimen (No. 125). The stems of all the three have similar prickles and aciculi ; but there are much fewer (indeed scarcely any) hairs on Mr. Bagnall's plant. My opinion now is that these three plants are forms of the segregate species, and that it must bear Mr. Bloxam's name, given to it and published nineteen years, sooner than that of Boulay, namely, R. rotundifolius. Mr. Bagnall's plant differs fi-om my short description of R. rotundifolius (' Rubi,' 252) by its terminal leaflets being not only duplicato-dentata, but duplicato-reflexi-dentata, in the manner described by Boulay. On none of my specimens of R. rotundifolius from Twycross, nor on the one from Cowley Park, are the leaves more than duplicato-patenti-dentata, for the teeth which terminate the chief veins are simj)ly more prominent than the others, although showing a manifest tendency, but only a tendency, to be reflexed. On the plant fi-om Bromsgrove Lickey the recurved hooks, formed by some of the ^Drimary teeth, are as remarkable as on the R. deftexidens of Boulay. It appears, therefore, that Mr. Bagnall's plant has differently shaped leaves, from either of the others, and also a less hauy stem ; that it agrees exactly with one of them in its dentition, and with both in most other respects. 18. R. GLANDULOSUS ft. HiRTus. — Thcro are two plants in Mr. Bloxam's "Set" which seem to belong to the same species: — (1) That named R. fuscus (from Beaumaris) is apparently the former R. fuscus of Lees, Bloxam, and myself. I have been long convinced that it is not the R. fuscus, W. & N., but the R. hirtus, 208 NOTES ON RUBI. of those authors. The other (2) bears the name of B. hirtiis. It wants the barren stem, but apparently the very young panicle resembles that of the precedmg (1) ; and it also is from Beaumaris. R.fiaxidijiorus, MiilL, is shown, byBoulay's specimen and descrip- tion (' R. V.,' 83, and p. 102), to be the same. Of course B,. hirtus is the older name. R. Eeuteri, Merc, of Eeuter's 'Cat. Genev.,' 272, and ' Genev. R. L.,' 123, of which I possess an authentic s^^ecimen, is very closely allied to R. hirtus. It is exactly like specimens gathered by Mr. Purchas at Sellack and Penyard Park, in Hertfordshu-e, and agrees well with others distributed many years since by Mr. Baker as R. rudis, which he gathered between Thirsk and Topchff, in Yorkshu-e ; and also with one from Banchory, in Scotland, which I named R. Koehleri var. infestus for its collector, Mr. J. Sim. jR. Reuteri differs chiefly from R. hirtus by its ob ovate -acuminate terminal leaflet, which is rather less hairy beneath, and less coarsely serrate ; but I do not consider it as more than a form of R. hirtus. 19. R. HETEROCLITUS. — The specimen named R. heteroclitus in the "Set" is, on the first view, very like my authentic R. hetero- clitus contained in the ' Herb. Rub.' (ed. 1, 119, and ed. 2, 54), but cannot really be the same. Wii'tgen and Miiller correctly refer their plant to the Suherecti; but that of Bloxam has not the pecuhar clothing, or rather nakedness, of the sepals so characteristic of that group ; nor does its stem, as shown by fine specimens, sent to me as authentic, by Mr. Bagnall, fi'om New Park, Middleton, Warwickshii-e, at all agree with that of the Suherecti. Although, therefore, I am obliged to give my decided opinion that it is not R. heteroclitus, I am far less able to give it a certain name. But, without being able to decide with certainty the true place of the specimens from Bloxam and Bagnall, I think that they are closely allied to R. uillicaulis j3. adscitus, the R. vulgaris of Lindley's first edition. 20. R. PuRCHASii, Blo.v. — It is unfortunate that Mr. Bloxam did not describe, or at least characterise, this plant, of which I find a specimen in the " Set," and possess another from Mr. Purchas, for I do not know where to place it. 21. R. DUMETORUM vur. iNTERMEDius, Warr. — Mr. Bloxam used this name in the " Set," but it is now dropped by Mr. Warren in favour of R. tuherculatus, which is very fahdy rei3resented in the ' J. of B.' (viii., 1. 106). The specimen in the " Set" probably does not belong to it, and is undeterminable. 22. R. DUMETORUM var. coNCiNNus. — The specimen issued by Mr. Bloxam, and authenticated by Mr. Warren, can hardly be a form of R. tuberculatus, to which his var. concinnus is referred by the latter botanist in the ' J. of B.' (viii. 152), but seems rather to belong to my R. corylifolius y. purpureas. It is far from beuig a satisfactory specimen. I possess specimens given by Mr. E. Lees many years since, and named by him R. dumcntorum var. glabratus THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. 209 (a synonym placed under R. coryUf'oUufi y. purpureus in my ' Rubi') ; and they are probably of the same gathering as those which Mr. Warren saw at Kew, and in Mr. Bloxam's collection (' J. of B.,' viii. 172). I see no reason to doubt their being correctly placed in my ' Eubi,' and that Pi. dumetorum var. concmnus is the same as my R. corylifolius y. purpureus. 23. E. DUiiETORUM var. intensus and var. ferox. — Mr. Bloxam has issued specimens under these names in his " Set." I am inclined to consider them as belonging to the same sx3ecies. They do not seem to me to agree with Mr. Warren's description of his var. intensus ; but if the former of them is really var. intensus his idea of its being the Fi. horref actus, Miill., is fully confirmed; that is if w^e may consider the specimens so-named by Genevier, and distributed by Baker, as correct. Dr. Focke does not notice R. horrefactus, and therefore we are deprived of his valuable helj). Mr. AVarren also refers to plants from Cadeby, in Leicestershire, distributed by Mr. Bloxam under the name of R. diver sifolius (Lindl.), as being his var. intensus. I have one of those specimens before me, and am more inclined to refer it to the var. diver sifolius of Mr. Warren's paper than to his var. intensus. It is, therefore, my opinion that R. diversifolius, Lindl., includes the forms men- tioned by Mr. Warren as R. dumetorum 5. diversifolius and f. inteyisus, and that R. horrefactus, Miill., is the same plant. The nsime ferox, given by Mr. WaiTen, 1869, but declared by him to be wrong in 1870, ought not to have been now revived. He says (' J. of B.,' viii. 175) that the R. dumetorum ysly. ferox of the 'Rubi German' is quite different from our R. diversifolius, Lindl., and, therefore, I may add, from the plants now under consideration. THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. . . By E. M. Holmes, F.L.S. (Continued from p. 120). Fam. Lichenacei. Trib e — Ca liciei . Sphinctrina turbinata, Pers. Calicium turhinatum (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) Parasitic on the thallus of Pertusarice. E. B. 2520. Tunbridge Wells Common ; Jenner Fl, Tunbr. Trees near Sibertsw^old. Calicium chrysocephalum, Acli. On palings ; rare. On old pales, at Shipbourne ; Jenner Fl. Tunbr. C. ph^ocephalum, Borr. On old pales and timber in damp, shady places. E. B. 1540. On a barn between Tunbridge Wells Common and Hurst Wood; Jenner Fl. Tunbr. 2e 210 THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. C. Trichiale, Ach. Var. ferrugineum, Boit. C. fernujineum. (Jeuner Fl. Tiinbr.) On old oaks and i^alings. On old pales at Shipbom-ne ; Jenner Fl. Tunhr. C. HYPERELLUM, Acll. On trunks of old trees; frequent. E. B. 1832. The fi-uctifi- cation not common. Wye ; Hythe ; Sibertswold. In fruit at Pensliurst Park ; Broome Park, near Sibertswold; and Cliilstone Park, near Lenbam. In tbe barren state this formed the Lepraria /lava of the early Lichenologists. C. trachelinum, Ach. C. sjjharocephalum (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On trees and old pales. E. B. 414. On decayed trees, near Westerham ; Wye ; Ashover Wood, near Pensliurst. Known fi-om ('. quercinum by the lower surface of the apothecia being of a reddish colour. C. quercinum, Fers. C. clavellum (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On old oaks and palings. On old oaken rails near Penshurst ; Ide Hill, near Sevenoaks. Lympne, near the canal. C. CURTUM, Borr. On old palings and on dead wood. E. B. 2503. Hythe, near Eomney. On dead trees, near Otford. C. SUBTILE, Fers. C. clehile (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On dead trees and old timber. E. B. 2462. On an old barn, between Tunbridge Wells Common and Hurst Wood. CONIOCYBE FURFURACEA, AcJl. On the roots of trees and sandy ground. E. B. 1539. In sand-caves at Chiselhiu'st, House. Known by its spherical spores from BaUcium citnnum. Trachylia tympanella, Fr. Calicium tympanellum (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On old posts and palings ; common. E. B. 810. On old railings, near Penshurst ; Brasted ; on old gate-posts near Egerton ; Dunk's Green, near Hadlow. Tribe — Spharophorei. Sph^rophoron coralloides, Fers. On sandstone rocks ; very rare. E. B. 114. Hungershall rocks, sparingly ; Jenner Fl. Tunhr.'. Found, in 1878, very sparingly and not in fruit on these rocks. I have not obseiwed it elsewhere in Kent. [S'. covipressum, Ach., which is abundant on some of the sand- rocks in Sussex, should be looked for in Kent. It may be recog- nised by the flattened stem and the apothecia developed laterally THE CRYPTOGAailC FLORA OF KENT. 211 on the underside of the tufts, which are almost always found on the perpendicular sides of damp, shady rocks, and rarely, as with the other species, on exposed rocks.] Trihe III. — Bceomycei. B^OMYCES RUFUS, D.C. On exposed clayey hanks in woods, and on damp rocks; frequent. Winter and early sprmg. E. B. 373. Brastead ; Ightham Common ; abundantly in fruit on the rocks on Rusthall Common in December, 1877. B. ROSEUS, Pers. On hare spots among heath, frequent ; the fructification rare. E. B. 374. Ightham Common, in fruit ; abundantly in fruit at Toy's Hill, near Sevenoaks. In the barren state may be known from B. rufiis by its much whiter thallus, which is decidedly granular. Tribe — Cladoniei. Cladonia pungens, Flk. On hniy slopes. E. B. 2444. Kent, Mr. IL S. Hill ; Leightoiis Lichen Flora. Morant's Court Hill; Lydd Beach. Much resembles C. furcata, from which it may be known by turning yellow when touched with a strong solution of caustic potash. C. OERVicoRNis, Schcer. On rocky places. E. B. 2574. Busthall Common ; Jemier Fl. Tunhr. C. CARiosA, Flk. C. ventricosa var. c. cariosa. (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On the earth ; rare. E. B. Supplt. 2761. Horsmonden ; Jenner Fl. Tunhr. C. DELICATA, Flk. On roots of trees, or decayed stumps in w^oods ; frequent. Stone Wood, near Greenhithe ; on an old rail near Chelsfield. Var. siibsqiiamosa, Nyl. In damp shady woods ; rare. Ightham Common. C. AliCICORNIS, Flk. On dry, heathy ^Dlaces ; rare. September. Dillenius, t. xiv., fig. 12a. Lydd Beach, abundantly, in fructification. This species I have observed nowhere else in Kent. It grows on the mossy ridges of shingle. It is easily distinguished from C. cervicornis by the black fibres at the margin of the thallus, and by not being coloured yellow by a solution of caustic potash. C. PYxiDATA, Fr. Licheii pijxidatus (Fl. Metr.j Common everywhere. E. B. t. 1393. Blackheath ; FL Metr. Sydenham ; Abbey Wood ; Otford ; Maidstone ; Dover ; Tunbridge Wells, &c. 212 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Var. ccespititia, Flk. E. B. t. 1796. Cladonia ccesjoititia (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) Hungersliall Kocks ; Oldbiuy Hill, Ightham ; Jenner Fl. Tunbr. YsiY.Anibriata, Hoffm. E. B. 2438. Greeuliithe. C. GRACILIS, Hofm. Dry, liilly, and heathy places. Lydd Beach, abundantly in fruit. Knowm by its crowded, slender, mostly simple brownish podetia. ( To he continued. ) Extracts ana Notices of 53oolts tiC i^temotrs. EXTEACTS FROM THE REPORT OF THE CURATOR OF THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOR 1876. (Continued from p. 184). Rosa virijinea, Rip., in Desegiise (not Extr. de I'Enum. des Rosiers, Jom'n.|Bot., June, 1874, p. 167); Cat. Rais., no. 28, p. 57. Wood near Horsebridge, South Hants. August, 1876. This is a very large bush (about 15 ft. high), with the exception of one stem quite destitute of prickles. The name has been confirmed by M. Desegiise. — H. Groves. — Except in having hairy styles, a Rose I collected at Gawton, Beer Ferris, S. Devon, September 13, 1875, agrees admu'ably with the above. Before I saw Mr. Groves's specimens I was at a loss what to name it, but suspected an approach to Pi. si/styla, a, view confirmed by M. Deseglise's arrange- ment, in which virginea appears among the styloscB, immediately before leucochroa. — T. R. A. B. (Enanthe pimpinelloides, Linn. Cliffs near Sidmouth, South Devon, May 30, 1876. A most luxuriant form, growing in patches, with rose-tinted flowers and stems three feet high, in long coarse grass close to the edge of the sea-cliff. Most of the heads in bud only, but a few with a flower or two open. On August 11, 1876, I found this plant in some abundance in a large park-like field at Teffont, South Wilts, growing side by side with Jiincus coiu/lonieratus. This locality is eight or nine miles from the Dorset border, and its first recorded station in AVilts. Here the plants were all in fruit, and already quite destitute of root-leaves. — W. Moyl.e Rogers. Arctium nemorosum, Lej . On quarry spoil-bank at Magheramorne, near Larne, Co. Antrim. August 24, 1876. One large plant only seen in flower, but abundance of root-leaves all round about. I am not aware of any other Iiish Burdock having been with certainty referred to this species. Some years since, while strolling over a little island in Strangford Lough, Co. Down, I gathered a plant which I sent to Cambridge as probably A. nemorosiun. Prof. Babington, after diagnosis, wrote me that it looked like the right plant, but too immature to be identified with certainty. I have NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 213 never since been on the island referred to at the proper time to search for better sj)ecimens. — S. A. Stewart. — Prof. Babington has certified to the Magheramorne specimens sent out through the Ckib being A. nemorosum. — T. E. A. B. Hypoclmris glabra, Linn. Hedgebank just beyond the first hedgerow on right-hand side of main road from Hoylake to Little Meols, Hoylake, Wirral, Cheshire, July 1, 1876. A defined station to affirm a record for Wnral made in 1837. — J. Harbord Lewis. Soiichus arvensis, Linn., b. glabra. Thames-side between Putney and Hammersmith, Surrey, August, 1873. I see your Desiderata List asks for this certamly rare form. I send a specimen. I never gathered the plant elsewhere. Here I rather impute its glabrous- ness to being tide-washed. — J. L. Warren. Crejjis nicaensis, Balb. Upland pasture, Harlow Hill, near Har- rogate, M. W. York, June 30th, 1876. For the last eight or ten years when at Harrogate, I had noticed in the above pasture a peculiar Crepis which I could never satisfy myself to be " virens." July 5th, this year, 1876, I sent a few dried specimens of it to Mr. J. G. Baker, for examination. I received the* following reply : "I do not feel sure about the Crepis. The involucre is much more glandular than in ordinary rirens. There is a closely-allied species called niccEensis, which has this more glandular involucre in com- bination with brown, instead of yellow, stigmas, achenes narrowed and scabrous at the top, and outer perianth spreading. Your specimens are rather too young to judge fairly of these last two points. Nicceensk comes between biennis and virens, and is likely enough to be introduced with foreign seed." July 11th, I sent to Mr. Baker a few of the most mature dried specimens I had, and also enclosed a few fresh-gathered ones. I received the following reply: "I feel satisfied now that the Crepis is really nicmeyisis. Fruiting involucre and achenes of yom's agree with undoubted continental examples, and I find the beak being scabrous to be an inconstant character. I send 50 specimens for distribution. — Thomas J. Foggitt. On the north bank of the Tweed, near Spring Hall, Eoxburgh. June, 1874-76. This is a very variable plant, as will be seen from specimens sent. — Andrew 'Brothekston. Occasionally seen about Plymouth, as an introduction with grass and clover seeds. — T. R. A. B. This plant seems to be becoming more frequent, though doubtless introduced with grass seeds. The flowers of Mr. Foggitt' s specimens are considerably smaller than usual, and, if this be frequently the case, no doubt the plant would be liable to be passed over as C. virens. — J. T. Boswell. Hieraciu)nDeivari,m.ihi; H.strictwn in part, Back. Stem sparingly leafy, slightly corymbosely or sub-corymbosely branched at the apex, scabrous, sparingly woolly, with spreading or retrorse white hairs ; peduncles sparingly clothed with stellate down, with few black-based hairs and a very few black gland-ti^^ped ones. Rosettes of radical leaves, x^roduced on seedling plants, and in late autumn on plants which have flowered. Leaves of the rosette oval, rather abruptly attenuated into shoi-t sparingly woolly petioles, sub- acute, slightly denticulate, with the teeth often reduced to callous 214 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. protuberances, sparingly hairy, with rather long white han-s above, and distmctly ciUated with similar hairs round the margins, reticulated beneath, with a few soft white hairs most numerous on the midrib. Leaves sjDaringly distributed over the stem up to the inflorescence, not more crowded in the upper part, and, indeed, often more distant there than on the lower part of the stem ; the lowest oval, or oval-obovate, or broadly-elliptical-obovate, gradually contracted into slender, distinct petioles ; intermediate ones regu- larly oval, or broadly elliptical, narrowed at each end, semi- amplexicaul, but scarcely auricled ; uppermost ones ovate, or ovate-lanceolate, amplexicaul, rounded at the base, acuminate ; all sub-enth'e, or denticulate in the middle, with the teeth remote and often reduced merely to callous x^oints, bright green, sub- glabrous, or with short distant, rather stiff, bristly hairs above, paler though not glaucous beneath, with the network formed of the ultimate veins apparent but not very distinct, with rather long stiff bail's on the veins and margins, and with shorter distant ones all over the lower surface. Anthodes rather small, few, in a simple corymb, or, if more numerous, in a lax panicle, with straggling branches, at the extremity of which there are a few sub-racemosely disposed anthodes. Pedicels short, incurved, usually with one or two minute bracts beneath the anthode. Periclme in flower sub- cylmdiical from an obconic base, in fi'uit conical. Phyllaries few, in two h-regular series ; the outer ones very few, short, adpressed, sub-obtuse; the mner ones with pale margins, obtuse; all blackish - olive, rather sparingly clothed with short black haks and longer black-based white ones, usually with a very few black gland-tipped hau's, rarely with any stellate down except at the very base. Ligules not ciliated at the apex. Styles fuscous. Achenes chestnut- brown. Plant bright green. " Shores of Loch Long, and Liverarnon (probably in Dumbarton- shire)? Inversnaid, Stu'lingslm-e : and Killin, Perthshire." — Dr. J. H. Balfour. " Lethensdene, Clackmannanshire, and Glen Devon, Perthshii-e." — Dr. A. Dewar. " Lethensdene and Linmill, on the Black Devon and Glen of Sorrow (Tributary to the Devon), Clackmannanslm-e ; Glen Devon, at the mouth of Glen Quay, and near the opening to Glen Eagles, Perthshire." — Tom Drummond. Scotland. Perennial. Late summer and autumn. Leaves of the autumnal rosette with the lamina, 2 inches long ; radical leaves in spring, scarcely forming a rosette, and often decayed before flowering, 3-8 inches long and 1-2^ mches broad, insensibly attenuated into the petiole ; intermediate leaves, 2-5 inches long by f-2i inches broad. Stem 1-3 feet high. Panicle branches, 2-8 inches long. Anthodes about the size of those of R. vuhjatum. Pericline about ^-incli long by J-inch in diameter. The British, or reputed British species of Hieracia to which H. Deivari is most nearly allied are H. Jiiranwn, Fries, (Borreri, 'E. B.,' ed. iii.), and H. G-othicum, Fries. No doubt it sometimes presents a sui^erficial resemblance to H. strictum, Fries, but then- physiological characters are widely different. NOTICliS OJb* liOOKS AND MElMOIKS. 21 5 Like H. Juranum, and H. (TothiciDii, it produces a rosette in seedlino- plants, and in old x^lants, at the base of the flowering stems in late autumn. In spring there is produced a more imperfect rosette, and some of the leaves at the very base of the stem commonly remain nearly to the time of flowering and sometimes even later, especially in shady places. The seedling rosette, the late autumnal rosette, the persistence of the lowest leaves, I have never met with in wild or cultivated specimens of H. strictuni, H. crocatuni, H. coryinbosuni, and H. prmumthoides. From H. Juranum it differs in having the stem scabrous, the leaves much less amplexicaul and without distinct auricles, not so conspicuously paler beneath and commonly more hairy above ; the panicle when polycephalous does not produce numerous branches termmating in small corymbs, the anthodes are con- siderably larger, the perianth-segments not thickly clothed with shoi-t, thick, gland-tipped hairs, and the ligules not distinctly cihated at the apex. In the garden H. Dewari flowers about a fortnight or three weeks later than H. Juranum. There is, how- ever, a striking similarity between small specimens of the two in which the branches of the panicle terminate in solitary heads ; and I should not be surprised to hear that H. Dewari was the plant Dickson had from Harehead Wood, Selkh'k, and that he sent H. Juranum to Mr. Borrer from his own garden, believing it to be the same as the wild plant. H. Dewari bears some resemblance to the broader-leaved states of H. gothicwn, but differs in the leaves being semi-amplexicaul, with a greater tendency to be ovate in outline and less denticulate on the margms. I have never seen it with the distinctly- toothed leaves so frequent in H. f/othicwn. The leaves are of a much brighter green, and not so much paler beneath; they are also more hairy. The j)anicle when polycephalous has not the same tendency to produce branches terminating in corymbs. The anthodes are considerably smaller, the inner phyllaries less attenuated and much more liau\y. From H. strictum it differs (in addition to the points already stated) by having the stem scabrous, the leaves broader in the middle and more attenuated at each end ; and more conspicuously by the long straggling branches of the polycephalous panicle. But the greatest stress must be laid on the fact of its producing a true rosette. All the specimens Mr. Backhouse has gone over in herbaria I have access to he has named H. strictum. H. cory)nhosum, Fries, and H. crocatum, Fries, differ still more widely from H. Dewari than does H. strictum. Both, especially H. cori/mhosum, have the stem leaves much more numerous, more parallel- sided, and the polycephalous jDanicle with the branches ending in small corymbs. H. crocatum also has the pericline much larger, more abru^Dt at the base, and with far fewer hairs. H. cori/mbosum has the leaves more glabrous, and neither the one nor the other produces rosettes. At one time I thought it might be //. datum, of Fries; but as I now possess Lindeberg's 'Hieracia Scandinavian Exsiccata,' I can 216 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. say without hesitation that it is not No. 92 of that collection. I believe its nearest ally is H. Dovreme, Fries, but the polycephalous panicle is too different to permit me to join them. H. Dnrrmse- protrartum, however (Lind., 'Hierac. Scand. Exsicc.,' Nos. 40-41), has a panicle more like H. Dewarl : so I requested Mr. J. G. Baker to compare H. Dewari with Fries and Lagger's specimens of fi. Dob'rnise-protractuni, and his answer is: " I feel quite satisfied that your plant is distinct from these (H. Dorrense and H. J>ovreme- pnttrartiini).'' Being unable to identify the plant with any described species, I am reluctantly forced to give it a provisional name, and have chosen for that purpose one to commemorate the late Dr. Andrew Dewar, of Dunfermline, to whose explorations of the botany of Clackmannan, Kinross, South Perth, and West Fife, we are much indebted. Few local botanists appear to have worked their district better, and been more careful to avoid erroneous records. Most of the specimens in British herbaria, previous to 1875 (when Mr. T. Drummond sent it to the Botanical Exchange Club as " H. strictum, broad-leaved form"), were sent by Dr. Dewar from Linmill and the Ochills under the name of H. ' inuhndes,' Tausch, and H. ' rif/idimi,' Hartman. There is, however, no doubt that the plant was first collected in the Loch Lomond district by Dr. J. H. Balfour. I am greatly indebted to Mr. Tom Drummond for taking me to the stations at Linmill, on the Black Devon, near Clackmannan and Glen of Sorrow, above Dollar, Clackmannanshire, and Glen Quay, close to where it enters Glen Devon. At Linmill the plant grows on the banks of the stream in an open wood, and many of the si)ecimens are extremely luxuriant ; it grows in compan}^ with H. strictum, which here flowers a fortnight later than H. Dewari. Li the Glen of Sorrow the station is on ledges of rock. In Glen Quay it grows on ledges of rock and on landslips ; and here, in 1876, it was in great profusion, growing m company with H. i/otJii- cmn, and flowering at the same time. H. strictum grows in Glen Devon, about a mile and a half fi-om the station for H. Dewari. May not H. Dewari be the Scotch plant referred to by Fries in his ' Symbol^e ' as H. Durrense / — John T. Boswell, Dec. 1, 1877. [The description of H. Dewari was read at a meeting of the Bot. Soc. of Edinburgh, December, 1877.] (ientiana AmareUa, Linn., var. prcecoj-, Smith. Biddlesdowns, near Croydon, Surrey, June 3, 1876. Sent, as although probably not rare when looked for, only recorded from Tring (as verna) and Lincoln. Scattered along a chalky bank, with Poli/t/ala, Lotus, &c. — A. Bennett. I have found spring-flowering plants of the allied species, G. campestris, in the neighbourhood of Plymouth. They have also been met with in the Isle of Wight. — T. E. A. B. Atriple.v sinuata, Hoff. Coast at G. Coppard's Gap, West Sussex. August, 1876. In the last report of the Exchange Club (see p. 23) I hinted that this plant was probably introduced in this station by ships' ballast. This year I have confirmed this fact, having dis- covered a dozen more plants near and around a large square black building used for the storing of grain, a furlong nearer Brighton NOTICES OF BOOKS AND IMEMOIRS. 217 than mj^ three plants of last year. One clay, seemg a ship unloacUng grain at this very point, I ascertained from the sailors that the cargo came from Eussia. The plant has got a fan- hold of the coast, and, if not unduly gathered, will spread. I regret my specimens are so poor, hut I was too early this year for matured examples. — J. L. Warren. Rumex sylvestns,W£dli\ Damp spot, Kelvedon, Essex. Sept., 1876. — E. G. Varenne. This j)lant seems to me not true si/lvestris, but a hybrid between ohtimfoUus and nemorosus, or, possibly, con- glomeratus. — J. T. Boswell. R. ohtusifolhis, Auct., var. sylvestris, Wallr. Bank of Forth, between Causeway Head and Cambuskenneth, Co. Clackmannan. September 12, 1826. There is a good deal of this plant on the north bank of the river ; unfortunately it escaped notice till late in the season, and then only a few poor specimens could be got. — T. Drummond. I think this the same as the Putney plant. — J. T. Boswell. Rumex — hybrid? At the bottom of a coast-cliff, near Down- derry, St. Germans, E. Cornwall. July 24, 1876. A very curious plant, near crispus or jjratensis. Much like the former in the greatly- waved leaves, though only the lower stem ones were noticed, the root-leaves being withered when it was found. The panicles grew very high. Some of the enlarged petals had short acute teeth. There was only one root at the spot. Probably a hybrid. — T. R. A. B. I think this must be referred to R. crispus var. sub- cordatus, Warren. It appears to fruit too freely to be a hybrid ; stiU, as Mr. Briggs suggests, it may be one between crispus and pratensis. — J. T. Boswell. Typ)ha (J sp.) Shallow pool in the Tavy Valley, near Lopwell, S. Devon. July 27, 1876. I suppose angustifolia by the narrow leaves, &c., but the larger of the spikes seems in some measure to approach T. latifolia. In other cases I have also noticed inter- mediate features in Typha specimens collected in this neighbour- hood.— T. R. A. B. This comes very near the T. latifolia ft. media, but it is nearer the genuine latifolia than the Wimbledon plants mentioned in 'E. B.,' ed. iii. — J. T. Boswell. Potamogeton nite^is, Web. I send examples of this pond- weed (gathered m June, July and Aug., 1875-6) from different parts of the Tweed and Teviot, where it is very common, I may say abundant, in the counties of Pioxburgh, Berwick, and Northumberland. It is variable in appearance, like others of the family, as will be seen from specimens sent. In the description of the leaves in ' Student's Flora,' recurved is surely a misprint for wcurved. — Andrew Brotherston. Very luxuriant specimens. — J. T. Boswell. ** Potamogeton lucens, Linn., b. decipiens:' In the Wye, Sellack, Herefordshire. August 12, 1876.— Augustin Ley. I should like much to see a series of specimens of this plant, particularly some in fruit, and with the barren branches fully developed. I am inchned to name it P. nitens, though the leaves are less amplexicaul than they usually are in that plant, but they are too much so for 2f 218 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIES. P. liicens. The serrated margins of the leaves and the small spikes separate it from P. decipiens. — J. T. Boswell. ZannichelUa 2>ohjcarpa, Nolte. Brackish marsh near Belfast, Ireland. — S. A. Stewart. The plant I send to the Clnh was collected by me as Z. brachijstemon, though the very short style and narrow carpels should have enlightened me ; it is abundant in the brackish ditches of the ground reclaimed from the sea, adjoining the People's Park, Belfast. There were few flowers at the time, but the following I find on my notes : "Anther fila- ments about one-eighth mchlong." Little attention seems to have been given to the Ii-ish ZcmnicheUiw. Here, in my district, they are rare. — S. A. Stewart. This is Z. polycarpa, Nolte, apparently the true plant, of which I have been favoured with a specimen from Mr. H. C. Watson, collected by Prof. Keichenbach atNolte's station, Heiligenbavn, Schleswig, which is a stouter plant, with more con- nivent, longer, smoother, and more sausage-like carpels with shorter styles than in the Orkney plant, which is no doubt var. tenuissima, Fries. — J. T. Boswell. Hahenaria vindis, Brown. Elevated rough pasture between Plympton and Dartmoor, S. Devon. July 15, 1876. Previously found this vear on the border of Dartmoor, near Tavistock, by Mr. Francis Brent, of Plymouth.— T. R. A. B. Trichonema Columna, Reich. — Still abundant on Dawlish Warren in April, 1876. I looked for it there in vain on March 23rd, the season being late. On April 26tli, it was just opening into flower in two widely- separated parts of the warren, not a single specimen (that I could find) yet fruiting. By May 24th the plant had almost w^holly disaiDpeared, Mr. Briggs and I on that day havuig to search for an hoiu* or more before we came on a few withered specimens (in fruit.) — W. Moyle Rogers. Carex Bcenninghauseniana, Weihe. Eskalt, near Whitehaven. Found by Mr. Hodgson, and sent to me by Rev. R. Wood, of Westward, who thought it nearer "axillaris.'' After carefully examining the specimens, it seemed to me to be Boenninghauseniana. I sent a specimen to Mr. H. C. Watson, with the query, ' Axillaris or Boenninghauseniana !' His reply was, ' The Carex is Buenning- hauseniana.' — A. Bennett. (To be continued.) Untersurhungen i'lher die Kntiri(kelungsgeschichte der Laubmoos-Kajisel und die Kmhryo-Kntwichehing ciniger Polgpodiaccen. Von Dr. Kienitz-Gerloff. ( Botanische Zeitung,' Jan. 1878. With three plates). The following is a summary of the author's exhaustive study of the development of the capsule of Phascum cuapidatiun. We may, however, omit the first steps, since the observations of Hofmeister regardmg them are found to be in the main correct, except that, after the formation of quadi-ant cells, each of these latter divides, by means of an anticlinal wall, into an inner (seen NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 219 ill traiisverse section) four-sided and an outer three-sided cell. The former of these cells is now divided by a pericliual wall into an inner and an outer, and in this way a central square {Grimd- quadrat) makes its appearance. This method of growth corresponds closely with the process observed by the author himself in JungenjiannicB, and by Kuhn in Andrecea. Each of the eight peripheral cells is now segmented into an inner and an outer by a periclinal, and each of the new outer ones by a radial wall. So far the development of seta, apophysis, and capsule is uniform. In the seta, the peripheral cells first divide sometimes by radial, sometimes by periclinal, septa, and the same method of division is sometimes relocated, so that some irregularity is seen in the dis- position of these cells : meanwhile those of the central- square become segmented in the same way as the primordial quadrants were. In the apophysis the process in the central square is the same, but in the peripheral cells, after the first radial septum, two periclinal septa are laid down, after which the new peripheral cells divide radially. In the part destined to become the capsule, the peripheral cells divide at first radially, then periclinally, then radially again, then again periclinally, and finally radiaUy. All these divisions occurring contemporaneously m cells of the same age, it follows that the outer boundmg layer of the young capsule consists of sixty-four cells in cross section (that of the apophysis is formed almost always of thirty-two cells). While the process sketched above is going forwards, and the whole capsule is increasing in length, transverse walls appear principally in the (reckoning from outside) fourth layer of cells. The cells of this layer, which immediately border on the central square, are originally eight, a number which becomes doubled by each dividing radially, after which each daughter -cell divides periclinally. The two layers so formed constitute the outer spore-sac. At this time a periclinal wall makes its appearance in each cell of the central square, and the cells of the third layer from outside swell considerably, and, together with those of the two outermost layers, grow more quickly than before in all du'ec- tions. The consequence of this is that the three outer layers become separated from the intrajacent ones, and this is the origin of the aii--chamber. In the central square, the external layer of cells is the layer of the mother- cells of the spores (spore-layer) ; this forms the outer boundary of the columella — at this stage con- sisting of four cell-rows in transverse section. In the development of the capsule, then, we see two processes. The one consisting in the differentiation, from a central square of four cells, of columella and spore-layer ; to this portion of the capsule the author gives the term ' endothecium.' The remainder of the capsule, less difierentiated but necessarily larger, comprising the capsule-wall of three cell-layers and the outer spore-sac of two layers with the intervening hollow space, the term * amphi- thecium ' is applied. The author also observes that this latter corresponds to the amphithecium of the higher Liver Mosses. In the layers bounding externally the air-chamber of the young 220 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. capsule, and especially in the innermost of them, increase in size continues ; the number of the constituent cells is doubled by means of radial walls, and the air-chamber enlarges. At the same time, the cells of the outer spore-sac increase to a moderate extent, and those of the spore-layer vigorously, by radial walls, the latter also enlarging in the direction of the radius, and thus pressing together the former. When the spore-layer consists of eight cells in transverse section, the cells of the columella commence dividing, the succession of segmentation corresponding with that seen in the original quadrant-cells. The outer layer resulting from this process constitutes the inner spore- sac ; while it is going forward the rupture between the third and fourth layers advances inwards above and below ; by this means are formed the two short columns which retain the tissues inside the air-chamber in connection with the top of the capsule and with the apophysis : each of them consists of four rows of cells in longitudinal section. Meanwhile the cells of the layer bounding the air-chamber externally become vaulted into that chamber, and rounded at the opposite side, so that intercellular spaces make their appearance between this and the second layer. Some of the cells of the third layer then divide radially, and whilst the two daughter- cells are vaulting inwards so as finally to encroach on their neighbours, the se^Dtum between them divides in the middle ; thus is formed a stomate affording commmiication between the air-chamber and the intercellular space just mentioned. The development of the sporogonium of Ceratodon jnirpureum is essentially similar (exception made for minor differences of struc- ture) to that of Phascurn. In this species, each of the last-formed (peripheral) cells of the young capsule undergoes periclinal division, so that the laj^er immediately bounding the central square is com- posed of eight cells in transverse section, the following one of sixteen, the next of thirtj^-two, and the two outermost of sixty- four cells. The formation of the air-chamber (between the fourth and fifth layer countmg from outside) of the spore-layer, inner spore-sac, columella, and stomata is the same as in Fhasciim. The author has minutely worked out and figured the development of the peristome, the result being that the entire peristome belongs to the amphithecial region, the outer cells of this structm-e being continuations of the fourth or air-chamber-bounding layer, and its inner cells of the outer si)ore-sac. In the growing capsule of Funaria }uj(jrometrica the formation of the central square does not take place by means of two walls (an anticlinal and a periclinal) at right angles to each other, but by the laying down of a single perichnal wall. By a process similar to that which we have seen in Ceratodon, the amphithecium at length consists of nine layers. In the zone of the annulus, however, and beyond it is composed of onty six layers. The peristome in this species is developed from the fourth, fifth, and sixth cell-layers (counting from the outside) ; it is, therefore, entirely amphithecial. Each cell of the central square divides by a periclinal and an anticlinal wall at right-angles to each other NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIKS. 221 into an inner and two outer cells. By this means a second small square is formed inside the central square. The four cells con- stituting this small square divide each by three longitudinal divisions perpendicular to each other ; while each of the outer cells divides radially, and the daughter-cells are each of them segmented into three by two periclinal walls. The peripheral layer forms the spore-layer (as in the species before examined). The further multiplication of the cells of these layers takes place radially. The formation of the au'-chamber is essentially the same as in Phascum. Whilst the cells of the inner layer of the wall swell up and assume a rounded form, the greater number of the cells become separated from the layer outside and inside them, and only in single places do they remain in connection either with the layer inside or outside them. Thus arise the two- to five-celled threads which connect the capsule- wall with the outer spore- sac. These threads are, at first, dii'ected from above downwards and outwards ; afterwards they are almost horizontal. The portion of the paper occupied with the development of the embryo of PolypodiacecB is copiously and very clearly illustrated, but it does not call for special remark. The author then passes on to criticise Pringsheim's objection to his theory of revolution of the embryo ; this objection is founded on the presumed fact of the seta being an axial structure, a view which is energetically denied. S. M. Botany; Moryholoqij and Physiology. By W. E. M'Nab, M.D., F.L.S. Botany: Classification of Plants. By W. K. M'Nab, M.D., F.L.S. (London Science Class-Books. ) Longmans & Co. 1878. These two small volumes are intended to serve conjointly " as a basis for the botanical teachmg in the higher classes of schools, and also to supply the wants of medical and other students." The plan pursued is essentially different from that followed in most of the English elementary works on Botany at present in use, of which we may take Su' J. D. Hooker's " Primer of Botany " as the best exponent. Instead of occupying the attention of the beginner for the most part with details of the morphology of the various organs, and with the technical terms thus brought into use, Professor M'Nab plunges at once into the heart of his subject, and describes, in the first few pages, the structure of the histological cell, proceeding next to that of tissues. The plan is, in miniature, the same as that of Sachs's "Lehrbuch," and, mdeed, of almost all German text-books. We believe it to be sound; and oiu: own experience convinces us that it is the right course for young, as well as for more advanced, students. The two volumes form together, in fact, very much a condensed abstract of the fourth Ger- man edition of Sachs's Textbook, which has not yet appeared in an English dress, and which contains many material changes fi-om the third. The chapters on Morphology and Physiology seem to us 222 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND IMEMOIRS. very well done, as far as the limited space has permitted ; Sachs has been here very closely followed, even in the details of the arrangement. It will no doubt strike the English reader as strange that, under the head of Morphology, while sections are given to the root, stem, and leaf, scarcely a word is said about the structure of the floral organs, or of the fruit and seed, the plan of the work requhing that these subjects be deferred till the 2nd volume, and treated of under the head of Flowering Plants. The misprints are exceedingly few, and errors and inaccuracies of a graver kind, such as find their way into the best text-books, commendably rare. The only one we have noticed to which it seems deshable to call attention is where, in the description of Characea, the "nucule," or archegonium, is spoken of as the "sporocarp." No possible correct use of terms will allow an unfertilised germ- cell to be designated a spore ; but Professor M'Nab is not alone in this con- fusion of terms. Here and there we notice that the compulsory conciseness has led to a want of clearness or of an adequate definition of terms which will doubtless perplex the beginner. The least satisfactory part of the two volumes seems to us to be that on classification. The classification of Flowering Plants adojDted is a modification of that used by Sachs, which will be bewildering to English students. It would have been better to have adoj)ted the plan of the work which will undoubtedly become the text-book of classification in this country, the ' Genera Plantarum ' of Bentham and Hooker. In Cryptogams Dr. M'Nab has also closely followed Sachs, even m the very questionable detail of making the Characece and BcmcUoDnjcetes both orders of the class CarposporecE. In one important respect only is there a de\dation, viz., in removing VolvocinetJB (Volvox and Eudorma) from the Zijgusporea, and jDlacing them in Ousjwj-efP, leaving Pandorina and allied forms to form the family Pandorinea of Zijgosjjorea, as defined by Eostafinski, a deviation amj)ly justified by Cohn's researches. The woodcuts are entu*ely taken from Sachs, Prantl, De Bary, and other German and French writers, and are, therefore, excellent. Many of these are, however, too large for the small-sized page, resulting in the inconvenience, where they are numerous, of the illustrations out- running the descriptive letterpress by many pages. The most serious defect of the work is the absence of any index or glossary ; but the two little volumes deserve to become largely used for the purpose for which they are intended. A. W. B. The Clydesdale Flora. A Description of the Flowering Plants and Ferns of the Clyde District. By the late R. Hennedy. In Memoriam edition, revised. Glasgow : H. Hopkins. 1878. This is a fourth edition of a useful local 'Flora,' the author of which died in 1876. The dates of the previous editions are 1865, 1869, and 1874, and the present does not appear to have under- gone any alterations. It, however, possesses an additional interest NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIKS. 223 from containing a short biograpliical sketch of the author, by Mr. WiUiam Simpson, who also gives a portrait. Koger Kennedy was one of that class of self-taught naturalists whose enthusiasm triumphed over all obstacles and want of leisure. His herbarium is now in the Andersonian University of Glasgow, of which insti- tution he was Professor for thirteen years. An appendix, by Professor E. H. Paterson, is added, m which are added some twenty or thirty species, the localities for some of which, however, appear to be beyond the limits of the Flora. It is to be hoped that the author took counsel with some botanists of experience before he decided to XDublish as a new species, Ptcris gracile, Paterson, h-om Glen Eosa, Arran (p. 255); there is nothing in the diagnosis given to separate it from "a delicate variety" of the common Bracken. H. T. The second fasciculus of Beccari's " Malesia " (Genoa, 1877) is mainly devoted to monographic description of the Icacinea and Menispermace(e of the Indo-Malayan and Pa^Duan Archipelago. Of the former Order there are foui-teen genera and thkty-six species included; Byticaryuni (three species) is a new genus of the tribe Mappiece, and Polyporandia (monotypic) of Phytocreneif. In Menispermacece there are twenty-two genera and forty-five species, the new genera being Archanyelisia, dedicated to Prof. Archangeli, of Florence, and founded on Anmnirta temniscata, Miers, and a new species ; Macrococculiis ; Albertida (in honour of Signor D'Albertis, the Papuan traveller) ; and Bania. The remainder of the part is occupied by descriptions of new or rare Papuan plants of various affinities ; there are several new genera — Ahauria (Leyiiminosa., CaisalpiniecB), Gif/liolia (Pahna), Gestroa and Leviera {Monimiace(J>), — dedicated to Dr. Levier, of Florence. The plates represent the new genera of Icacinea and a new species of Pteleocarpa, which genus the author would remove from that Order, and place in Ehretiea. In the " Icones Plantarum " for June, 1878, are figured some interesting species, including the Seychelles genus, Mediisagyne, Baker (t. 1252.) There are also several plants collected by Dr. Schweinfurth in his last Central African journey, and some species of great interest from N. China, including Brachyhutrys, Maxim., a new genus of Borraginefr, (t. 1254), a new Saxih-age, S. Rossii, Oliver (t. 1258), and a new species of the curious genus of Bosacem, E.wchorda, E. serratifolia, S. Moore (t. 1255.) Other New Books. — A. Gray, ' Synoptical Flora of N. America,' vol. ii., pai-t 1. (Ivison & Co., New York, 6 dollars.) — J. Miers, * On the Apocynacea- of S. America,' with some preliminary remarks on the whole family. With 85 plates. (Williams & Norgate, London, £1 5.s.) — A. W. Eichler, ' Bliithendiagramme construirt V. erlantert.' II. Theil. Apetale & Choripetale Dicotylen. (Engel- 224 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. mann, Leipzig.) — H. G. Eeichenbach, /i/., ' Xenia Orchidacea,' vol. iii. part I. — ' West Yorkshire ' (Geology, Physical Geography, and Botany of), by J. W. Davis & F. A. Lees. (Keeve& Co., £1 Is.) Articles in Journals. — May, 1878. Bot. Zeituuf/. — H. Hoffmann, ' Experiments in culture ' (con- tinued ; tab. 9.) — V. V. Borbas, 'On certain type-specimens of Thlas])i.' — J. Sachs, ' On the history of the mechanical theory of growth of organic cells.' — H. Solms-Laubach, ' On the structure of the flower and fruit of the Pandanacece' (tab. 10.) Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. — F. de Thuemen, ' Symbolae ad flor. Mycologicam Austriacam,' (ii.) — A. Kerner, 'Distribution of Hungarian plants' (continued.) — G. v. Niesse, 'On Sporornna' (continued.) — F. Antoine, ' Botany of Vienna Exhibition ' (con- tinued.)— J. E. Strohecker, ' Chemical analysis of Nostoc' — J. L. Holnby, • The Beckov Mountain.' Hedwiyia. — L. Rabenhorst, ' On the Alga-Flora of the Auck- land Islands.' Flora. — S. Schulzer, ' Mycological notes.' — P. G. Strobl, 'Flora of the Nebrodes ' (continued). — Scharlok, ' A critical Primida from Switzerland,' — A. Minks, ' The Microgonidium.' — W. J. Behrends, ' Cerastium tetrandrum, Curt., with remarks on the micropetalous Cerastia of the Orthodon group.' Bull. Bot. Soc. Belg. (xvi., 3, May 2.) — A. Wesmael, ' Account of Herborization of the Society in 1877 ' (envii-ons of Mons.) — A. Gravis, * Teratological notes' (t. 1, 2.) — C. Lecoyer, ' Morpho- logical study of ThaUctrum' (t. 1-4.) — A. Deseglise, ' Adventive Flora of Geneva.' Ann. des Sc. Xat. (6, v., 1-3.) — A. Guillaud, 'Researches on the comparative anatomy and development of the stem in Mono- cotyledons ' (t. 1-6.) — E. Warming, ' On the Ovule.' Bidl. Soc. Bot. France (Session Mycologique at Paris, October, 1877.) — Boudier, 'New species of Fungi' (t. 4.) — 'List of species collected in forest of St. Germam, Oct. 22.' — M. C. Cooke, ' On some allied species of ^Fcidiacei.'' — Quelet, 'Fungi recently observed in the Jura, Vosges, and New Paris ' (t. 5, 6.) — Lucond and X. Gillot, 'Fungi collected in environs of Autun.' — 'List of species collected in forest of Villers Cotterets, Oct. 23.' — De Seynes, ' Report of the Fungus Congress at Hereford.' — A. Moquin, 'An abnormal habitat of a Coprinus.'' — T. Howse, 'List of Hymenomycetes in neighbourhood of London. — List of species collected m the forest of Montmorency, Oct. 25. — M. Cornu, ' On the Anthranose (disease of Vines), and (lado.sporium intricolum.' — ' List of species collected in forest of Fontainebleau, Oct. 26. Botaniska Xotiser (May 15.) — J. E. Zetterstedt, 'The forward spring of 1878.' — V. B. Wittrock, 'On Linncca borealis' (con- tinued.) ©rtginal ^xtitlt^. SPICILEGIA FLOE^ SINENSIS : DIAGNOSES OF NEW, AND HABITATS OF EAEE OE HITHEETO UNEE- COEDED CHINESE PLANTS. By H. F. K\nce, Ph.D., Meuib. Acad. Nat. Cur., &c., &c. (Continued from p. 114.) III. 1. Cappaeis [Eucapparis, conjmhosce) flexicaulis, sp. noc. Fruticosa, caule ramisque valcle flexuosis subangulatis glaberrimis brunneis, spinis stipularibus brevibus recurvis, foliis membranaceis glaberrimis e basi obtusa anguste oblongis apice emarginatis penniveuiis venis venularumqiie . rete supra paulum conspicuis costa tantum subtus prominula l-l-l poU. loiigis 3-4 lin. latis petiolo bilineali tomentoso, umbellis simplicibus axillaribus et termiualibus sessilibus 6-Q floris, peclicellis capillaribus 3-4 lin. lougis cum omnibus florum partibus petalis ciliatis exceptis glaberrimis, sepalis obovatis petalisque oblongis 2 lin. longis, staminibus circ. 20 petala plus duplo superantibus, gynoplioro 4-6 lineali, ovario J lin. tantum longo ovoideo acuto, stylo subnullo. In ins. Hai-nan, circa Hoi-hau, sest. 1877, coll. T. L. Bullock. (Herb. prop. n. 20274.) Closely allied to C. sepiaria, Linn., especially to the variety retusella, Thw., but differs by the perfect smoothness of its stem and leaves, and the form of the latter. 2. Saponaria Vaccaria, Linn. Prope Chin-kiang, prov. Kiang-su, a. 1876, coll. W. G. Stronach. Not found before in China, but occm's in Japan, though whether really wild there or not is doubtful. 3. Beryia ammamiioides, Eoxb. In agris otiosis j)roiDe Cantonem, d. 7 Sept. 1861, legit Sampson. 4. Hibiscus Abelmoschiis , Linn. Ad ri^ms graminosas fluviorum prov. Cantonensis, vulgaris. 5. Hibiscus surattensis, Linn. Ad Hoi-tau, ora occid. ins. Hai-nan, m. Jan., 1866, coll. F. Fagg ; circa Hoi-hau ejusdem insulse, vere 1877, leg. Bullock. 6. Greivia hirsuta, Vahl. In ripis montosis fl. West Eiver, prov. Cantonensis, necnon secus fl. North Eiver, coll. Sampson et Hance. Not, so far as I know, before recorded as a native of China. 7. Ailantus malabarica, DC. In ditione Amoyensi, legi m. Oct., 1857. For the determination of this species, quite new to the Chinese flora, I am indebted to Mr. Bentham. N. s. VOL. 7. [August, 1878.] 2 g 226 SPICILEGIA P^LORiE SINENSIS. 8. Celastrm {Gijmnosporia) Wallichiana, Wt. & Arn. Ad Amoy, ipse legi Oct. 1857 : in seinbus ad Pak-slia, ora niaxime australi prov. Cantoiieiisis, iieciion in ins. Hai-nan, m. Nov. 1866, coll. Sampson et Hance : circa Hoi-bau, ejusdem insulae, ^st. 1877, invenit Bullock. Mr. Bentliam named for me the Amoy plant, with which that from Hai-nan is precisely identical. It agrees well with Wight and Arnott's diagnosis, except that the branches are clothed with a ferruginous scurf-like pubescence composed of short thick jointed hairs, instead of having a polished bark, and the fruit is no larger than a pea, instead of equalling a hazel-nut. The arillode, which is white and conspicuous enough in the ripe seed, does not embrace its entire base, and extends somewhat less than half its length. Though restored in the 'Flora of British India,' I do not think Gijmnosporia can be kept apart from Celastrus, on account of the Australian species, to which Mr. Bentham has already called attention. M. Baillon (Hist, des PI., vi., 5) is distinctly of this opinion. 9. ViTis (Cissus, Monostigma) papillata, sjj. nov. Scandens, ramis tenuibus angulatis sulcatis glabris, stipulis ovatis scariosis, foliis trifoliolatis petiolo l-lj pollicari foliolis tenuiter membranaceis supra costa tantum parce hii'tellis sub lente minute densissimeque squamulosis luci obversis confertissime pellucido-punctatis ovato- lanceolatis basi obtusiusculis apice acutis x^auciserratis tenuiter penniveniis venis supra paulo conspicuis terminali 1-| poll, longo petiolulo 4-lineali lateralibus 15 lin. longis petiolulo 2-lineali, cirrhis simplicibus elongatis, cymis axillaribus pedunculo glabro folia sequante v. superante fultis parvis trichotomis corymbosis dense x)aucifloris, bracteis parvis ovatis scariosis, floribus (in spec, suppetent. nondum expansis) tetrameris |- lin. longis, calyce cupulato explanato margine truncato scarioso ciliato, petalis oblongis extus glanduloso-tomentosis, stylo brevissimo, stigmate simplici. Circa Hoi-hau, ins. Hai-nan, leg. Bullock, a. 1877. (Herb, propr. n. 20297.) This appears nearer to V. reticulata, Thw., which I have not seen, than to any other species I can find described. The specimen is too young for any details as to the fruit. 10. Cardiospermuiii Halicacahum, Linn. Circa Hoi-hau, ins. Hai-nan, aest. 1877, coll. Bullock. This is the first Chinese speci- men I have seen ; all those gathered in Hongkong and Canton province being referable to C. microcarpum, H. B. K. 11. Smithia sensitiva, Ait. In udis circa Cantoiiem, copiose, m. Nov., 1863, jjrimus detexit Sampson. The specimens are ex- ceedingly fine and luxuriant, the flowers larger than in the Assam I)lant. 12. Uraria lagopoides, DC. E prov. Fokien misit cl. de Grijs : in agro Cantonensi non infrequens. Found in various parts of the East Indies, the Malay archipelago, Polynesian islands, and Australia. 13. Loropetahun c/iinense, R. Br. In collinis propc Sai-nam, secus fl. North River, prov. Canton, d. 15 Sept., 1866, coll. Sampson et Hance. SPICILEGIA FLOK^ SINENSIS. 227 I believe this is the most southerly station known for this plant. 14. Callitriche verna, Linn. (Hegelmaier Monogr. Callitr. t. iii., f. 10.) In oryzetis ins. Danorum, Whampoae, ipse detexi, m. Febr., 1861 ; in stagnis Cantonensibus, Martio 1869, invenit Sampson. 15. Eugenia (Syzygium) Bullockii, sp. nov. Glaberrima, ramis cortice albido obductis, foliis brevissime petiolatis coriaceis oblongo- lanceolatis basi obsolete cordatis apice breviter obtuse acuminatis penniveniis venis utrinque subconspicuis subtus minute pustulatis utrinque opacis 4 poll, longis 1-lJ poll, latis, cymis terminalibus trichotomis densis folio triplo brevioribus, floribus subsessilibus, calyce obovoideo sub-bilineali margine integro, j)etalis calyptratim secedentibus. In ins. Hai-nan, circa Hoi-hau, coll. Bullock. (Herb, propr. n. 20289.) Amongst the species at my disposal this seems nearest to the Singalese E. Xeesicma, Wt. ! but differs by the colour of its bark, the compact inflorescence, and other characters. I do not know of any Polynesian species like it, but the Ceylon Syzygium umbrosum, Thw. ! is undoubtedly very close in affinity to E. sandvicensis, A. Gr. ! and to an undescribed species with varnished spathulate emarginate leaves (Vieillard n. 2609) h-om New Caledonia. The existence of Strongylodon, too, in Ceylon, the Hawaiian archipelago and New Caledonia, is another evidence of the relationship of these Floras. 16. Ammannia (Rotala) pentandra, Eoxb. In oryzetis agri Can- tonensis, d. 18 Junii, 1866, invenit Sampson. 17. Ammmmia (Botala) repens, Eoxb. In arvis humidis circa Cantonem, Oct. 1866, leg. Sampson. 18. Ammannia (Eotala) octandra, Linn. In herbidis udis circa Amoy, ipse legi, m. Octobri, 1857. 19. Ammannia {Euammannia) haccifera, Linn. Li ditione Can- tonensi baud rara. 20. Passifloka hainanensis, sp. nov. Caule scandente glabro angulato-compresso, foliis subcoriaceis integerrimis margine revo- lutis anguste oblongis basi rotundatis apice obtusiusculis mucro- nulatis penniveniis supra glaberrimis lucidulis subtus o]3acis velutinis glandulosis 3-3|- poll, longis 9-14 lin. latis petiole trilineali a^^ice glandulas duas ovales gerente, cirrhis simplicibus elongatis siDiralibus, floribus 2-3-nis 9 lin. longis pedunculo 1-lf poll, longo suffultis, bracteis setaceis, baccis ovalibus pubentibus. Ad Hoi-hau, ins. Hai-nan, aest. 1877, coll. T. L. Bullock. (Herb, propr. n. 20232.) Allied to P. Horsfieldii, BL, but differing in the form of the leaves and in the inflorescence. 21. Triclwsanthes palmata , Eoxb. In silvis densis ad angipoi-tum Tsing-ylin, fl. North Eiver. i^rov. Cantonensis, m. Sept. 1866, legg. Sampson et Hance. 22. Tetragonia expansa, Ait. In litore marino ad Macao, satis copiose crescentem detexi, m. Junio, 1863 ; in ins. Ilha Verde dicta, portus Macaiensis, iterum legi, m. Nov., 1866. Not before, to my knowledge, recorded from China, though found in the Bonin islands and Japan. '228 SPICILEGIA FLOE^ SINENSIS. 23. CEnanthestolonifera,'DC., var. (= Dasyloma japojiicnm, Miq.) In incultis circa Cantonem, a. 1864, leg. Sampson. 24. G^nanthc stolonifera, DC, var. (= Dasijloma hipinnatum, Miq.) Secus fl. Lien-cliau, prov. Cantonensis, m. Octobri, 1876, coll. Rev. J. C. Nevin. 25. Geophila reni/ormis, Don. In fissuris lapidnm circa monas- terium biulcUiisticum Fi-loi-tsz, d. 18, Sept., 1866 : in silvis ad Ting-ii-shan, secus fl. West River, m. Julio, 1870, coll. Sampson et Hance. Extensively distributed within the tropics, but not before detected in China. 26. Paederia tomentosa, Bl. ? In ins. Hai-nan, juxta Hoi-hau, aest. 1877, coll. Bullock. If Mr. Kurz is correct in reducing (' Journ. As. Soc. Bengal,' xlvi., 139) to the above-named species Miquel's P. harhulata and P. densiflora, the Hai-nan plant unques- tionably belongs here. It is, however, almost quite glabrous, the inflorescence only being strigillose. I distinguish specifically the ovoid-berried plant from India (of which beautiful specimens were distributed in Hooker and Thomson's Khasia collections) from the round-fruited one referred by Bentham (Fl. Hongk., 162) to P. fcctida, Linn. This name probably belongs to the first-men- tioned plant ; for Linnseus ascribes to it a "bacca ovata" (' Mant. Plant,' i., 62) ; and he appears, moreover, to have founded his species particularly on Rumphius' " Convolvulus foeiidus," which that author describes as having the fruit " sensim oblonga," and figures it as ovoid ('Herb, amboyu.,' v., 436. t. 160.) I would propose the name of P. chinensis for the Chinese and Ja^^anese plant, which is in reality much more nearly allied to P. fietida than to P. tomentosa, to which latter Mr. Kurz refers it with a mark of interrogation. Gaertner describes the fruit as "globosa 1. ovata," but figures it as globose ('De fruct.,' iii., 85, t. 195), after a specimen in the Banksian herbarium, the native country of which he does not state. 27. EnjKitoriwn stccchadosiniim, Hance. In prov. Cantonensi, ad fauces Tsing-yiin, fl. North River, necnon ad fauces Yeung-shui, fl. Lien-chau, copiose crescentem, ofiendit m. Octobri, 1876, Rev. J. C. Nevin. The first time this has been found wild. The serra- tures of the leaves are frequently deeper than in the cultivated specimens, and the achene is destitute of glands. 28. Artemisia parviflora, Roxb. var. ? In arena litorea profunda ad Pak-sha, extremitate australi prov. Cantonensis, ipse legi, d. 20, Nov., 1866. I believe the specimens gathered, which look very different from the Indian plant, and approach somewhat to A. scoparia, W. & K., are referable to Roxburgh's species, but the leaves of the flowering stems are very fleshy, smooth, with nari'ow linear divaricate segments, those of the young sterile shoots cano- tomentose, with broader cuneate trifid lobes. I suspect this varia- tion from the normal form is due to the locahty where it grows, exposed to heavy gales, which blow the loose sand up in enormous hillocks all along the coast, and carry it in clouds inland. In A. japonica, Thunb., which, contrary to Miquel and Maximowicz's SPICILEGIA FLOR.E SINENSIS. 229 opinion, I agree with Mr. Bentham in thinking probably distinct, the segments of the leaves of the sterile shoots are narrower than those of the flowering stems. 29. SciEVOLA (Crossotoma) hainanensis, sp. nov. Frntescens, caulibus diffusis cortice glabro snberoso cinereo obductis, ramulis novellis hii'tulis, foliis saepius fasciculatis spathulato-linearibus obtnsis V. obtusiusculis glaberrimis 6-7 hn. longis 1-1^- lin. latis axillis cinereo-lanatis, floribus axillaribus solitariis sessilibus v. breviter x^edunculatis bracteolis binis foliis homomorphis calycem duplo siiperantibus suffultis, calyce glaberrimo l^- lineali lobis latis rotundatis tubo triplo brevioribus, corolla extus glabra 4-5 lin. longa, indusio ciliato. Cu'ca Hoi-han, ins. Hai-nan, aest. 1877, coll. Bullock. (Herb, propr. n 20252.) An interesting i^lant, very closely allied to S. spinescens, E. Br. ! from which, however, it seems truly distinct by its woolly leaf-axils, sessile or sub-sessile flowers, foliar bractlets and developed calyx- tube. It is the only extra- Australian representative of the small section to which it belongs. 30. Jasminum trinerve, Vahl. Li fruticetis prope pagum Sai-nam, secus fl. North Eiver, prov. Cantonensis, d. 15, Sept., 1866, legg. Sampson et Hance ; in ins. Hai-nan invenit Bullock. Recorded only from Upper India and Java. 31. Styrax serndatum, Hoxb. In silvis densis circa monasterium buddhicumFiloi-tsz, secus fl. North River, prov. Cantonensis, d. 18, Sept., 1866, frf. coll. Sampson et Hance : in fruticetis paulo infra verticem montium Pak-wan, florif. invenit Sampson, sub fine Marth, 1868. 32. Wrightia puhescens, R. Br. Secus viam a portu Hoi-hau ad Kieng-chan, metropolin ins. Hai-nan ducentem, legi Novemb. 1866. A shrub or small tree of about twelve feet, the foliage much like that of W. tomentosa, but only hairy beneath, and with small glan- dular guttules beneath, and a very delicate reticulation of deep purplish vemlets between the hahs ; whilst the leaves of IV. tommtosa are quite pannose on the under surface, so that the network cannot be seen. The branchlets, too, of the Chinese plant are quite smooth. The follicles green and not quite ripe when Pgathered, are eight inches long, quite soldered into one, drying black, and marked throughout their whole length with innumerable elevated striae and interjacent fiuTows, the seeds 5 lines long, with a coma about an inch in length. 33. Marsdenia / iirceulata, J) one. In ins. Hai-nan, juxta Hoi-hau, a. 1877, leg. Bullock. I have seen no authentic specimens of this species, which had only been gathered in Cochin-china, but the present ones agree very weU indeed with the diagnosis, except that the 4-5 flowered cymes have a very short common peduncle, instead of the flowers being quite sessile. 34. Limnanthcmum cristaUim, Griseb. In stagnis ditionis Amoyensis, legi Oct., 1857 : prope Li-pau, secus fl. North River, prov. Cantonensis, m. Sept., 1866, coll. Sampson et Hance. 35. Hydrolea zeylanica, Vahl. In uliginosis extra Cantonem, 230 spicileCtIa flor.^ sinensis. Oct., 1866, leg. Sampson. This is certainly identical with the Ceylon plant, the " capsnla rugosa" hy which Choisy sought to distinguish Loureiro's H. inermis heing caused simply by the impression made on the thin j)arietes by the seeds. I sent good specimens of the Canton plant to Kew, but they must have been lost or mislaid, from the uncertainty Mr. Bennett felt as toLom-eho's name (' Journ. Linn. Soc.,' xi., 276.) 36. Heliotrophim hrevifoHum, Wall. In collinis incultis circa Amoy, Oct., 1857 ; in subulosis ad mare paeninsulae Macaiensis, copiose, aiitumnoque 1861-5 ego ipse legi. A critical plant, whose distribution is therefore doubtful. Dr. Anderson extends its area to the whole of the tropics of the old world and Australia, and unites mth it H. .strir/osum, Willd., together with H. tenue, Wall., H. tenuifoUum, R. Br., H. fruticosum, Forsk., and H. parvifolium, Edgw., but A. DeCandolle and Mr. Edgworth keep these species distinct. (Cfr. 'Linn. Journ.,' vi., 205.) Mr. Bentham, by restrict- ing H. strigosum, so far as this continent is concerned, to Western Asia (El. Austral, iv., 397), appears to consider the Chinese species distinct. And Boissier ('El. Orient.,' iv., 143) omits the usual note of geographical area under H. strujosum, but refers to it H. cordofanum , Hochst. & Steud ! and H. hicolor. Hochst. & Steud! both regarded by A. DeCandolle and by Bunge ('Uber die Helio- tropien d. mittelland-orient. Elor.,' 54) after examination, as good species. 37. Lettsomia Chalmersu, sp. nov. Caule volubili juniore canescente, foliis ovatis acutis basi leviter cordatis supra glaberrimis subtus cano-sericeis 2^-3^ poll, longis 1^-2^ poll, latis petiole 1-2-pollicari cymis axillaribus densis 7-10-floris pedunculo canes- cente circ. 1^-pollicari fultis, bracteis oblongis obtusissimis cum calyce adpresso-incanis 5 lin. longis, sex^alis ovato-oblongis obtusius- culis 2 exterioribus majoribus flori adpressis in fructu accrescentibus etintus rubescentibus glabris 4-6 lin. longis, corollae candidae hypo- crateriformis extus adpresse sericese intus glaberrimae tubo 3-lmeali limbo 9 lin. longo ad basin fere 5-partito lobis lanceolatis acutius- culis rectis x^atentibus, staminibus declinatis lobis j)aulo brevioribus filamentis glabris basi triangulari-dilatata dense glanduloso- fimbriata, disco crasso annulari luteo, stylo glaberrimo stamina parum superante, stigmate globoso-didymo, bacca globosa rubra biloculari, seminibus 4 v. abortu 2 subcompresso-rotundatis nigris glabris. Secus fl. West River, prov. Cantonensis, juxta Ting-ii-shan, Nov., 1874, coll. Rev. J. Chalmers. (Herb, propr., n. 20203.) I have drawn up my character partly from the original dried plant in fruit, and partly from living ones in flower, raised from seed. Except for the exserted genitalia, the flowers are more like those of a Jasmine than a Convolvulus. Allied to L. af/c/regata, Wt., which, however, has a jDink corolla, with less elongated lobes. Loureho's Argyreia acuta, which is probably near the present species, is described as with lanceolate-ovate leaves, and a terminal lax panicle. Choisy, who says he has seen Loiu'eiro's sj)ecimen, refers to it L. (estiva, Wt., but the accuracy of this seems to be questioned. Although I have followed Mr. Bentham, who in the SPICILEGL^ FLOR.E SINENSIS. 231 * Genera' keeps Lettsomia apaiii fi-om Argyreia, it must be admitted that these groups have no better claim to be distinguished than Pharhitis and Batatas have to be separated from Ipomoea. Dr. Wight was quite logical in re-establishing L^-Wio^/fm, because, unhke Mr. Bentham, he regarded a difference in the number of cells of the ovary and the ovules in each as sufficient grounds for the main- tenance of a genus ; but he also supposed that Maripa, Legeiidrea, Blinka-orthia and Humhertia would be absorbed by it. And the habit of Arriyreia and Lettsomia is so entii-ely the same that I think it would be far better to combine them. 38. Heuittia hicolor, Wt. & Arn. In ins. Hai-nan, juxta Hoi- hau, aest. 1877, coll. Bullock. Not to my knowledge j)reviously gathered in China. 39. Celsia coromandeliana, Vahl. Ad strata limosa a fluvio West Eiver anno praeterito deposita, j)rope fauces Shiu-hing, prov. Cantonensis, d. 7 Febr., 1867, coll. Sampson. I am not aware of this s^Decies having been hitherto found on the Asiatic continent eastward of Birma. 40. Limyiophila heteroplnjlla, Benth. In stagno juxta pagum Pui-shui, secus fl. West Eiver, in-ov. Cantonensis, 80 m. p. ab urbe, d. 9 Julii, 1870, coll. Sampson. The remaining species known from China have been enumerated bv Maximowicz (' Mel. Biol. Acad. St. Petersb.,' ix., 406.) 41. Torenia jjarviflora, URm. In multis locis Chinae austrahs. Corolla yellow, at anthesis not exceeding the calyx-teeth. 42. Torenia f1ava,'H.Sim. Cum priori. Corolla deep yeUow (not imle, as stated in the 'Prodi-omus '), with a purple blotch on each side, at anthesis exceeding the cah^L-teeth by fully a thu'd. 43. T. cordifolia, Koxb. Cum praecedentibus. Very like the last, but the corolla is white, with a purplish-blue spot on either side, its tube more exserted, throat less ampliate, and the cah^x is straight not inciuwed, and very conspicuously winged, and the fohage is nearly that of T. parviflora. The inflorescence, on which subsections are founded in the 'Prodromus,' affords a very in- constant and untrustworthy character. 44. Vandellia hirsuta, Ham. Ad ripas fl. West Eiver, prov. Cantonensis, d. 21 Julii, 1872, legg. Sampson et Hance. 45. Strohilanthes scaler, N. ab E. Prope Cantonem, coll. F. Parry ; in montibus Pak-wan, supra urbem, Dec. -Jan., 1867-8, leg. Sampson; in ins. Danorum, Whampoae, Dec, 1868, detexit Alius mens x^lfredus. I find, with Mr. Bentham, in the capsules I have opened either five or six seeds, one cell usually containing three, the other two ; but there are three retmacula in each. 46. Hijptis suaveolens, Poit. Prope Kieng-chaii, metropolin ins. Hai-nan, ad vias satis copiose, legi d. 17 Nov., 1866 : cu'ca Macao, passim in arenosis ad more pluries inveni. 47. Dijsophylla? tetraphi/Ua, Wt. In ins. Hai-nan, cii-ca Hoi- hau, a. 1877, invenit Bullock. The spike in ray specimen is not yet fully developed, but the plant agrees veiy well with Wight's character. The stem and leaves are clothed with dense appressed 232 spicilectIA flok^ sinensis. hairs, and the leaves are longer and more truly Imear (though rather obtuse than subulate) than represented m Wight's plate. ('Icon.,' ui., t. 1444.) 48. Lamium j^etiolatuw, Royle. In Silver Island, Chin-kiang, Maio, 1863, invenit Hay. Known previously from the Himalaya and Japan. Franchet and Savatier ('Enum. PL Jap.,' i., 381) refer the Japanese plant, which I have not seen, to L. album, Linn. In the present one, the pilose ring in the corolla-tube is certainly oblique, but yet I do not regard it as referable to that species, for the leaves are cuneate at the base and the calyx-teeth are greatly produced, whilst there is a marked difference in the aspect. 49. Leucas ^a/zata,Benth. Ad Hoi-tau, ora occidua ins. Hai-nan, Jan., 1866, leg. F. Fagg. Undistuiguishable from Dr. Thomson's Western Himalayan specimens. 50. Leucas zeylanica, R. Br. Ad Hoi-hau, ora septentr. ins. Hai-nan, coll. F. Fagg, Dec, 1865, Sampson et Hance, Nov., 1866. The more equal subulate less rigid calyx-teeth, closely placed and with acute sinuses and nerves conspicuously prolonged downwards into the hispid incurved tube give the flowers of L. aspera, Spr., a different api^earance. In the ^Dresent plant the calyx-tube, glabrous for the greater portion of its length, is shorter, more turbinate, less curved, quite truncate at the apex, the teeth distant and filiform, with then- nerves soon evanescent. L. linifolia, Spr., which Dr. Thwaites seems to think may be also referable to L. zeylanica, is apparently well characterised by the canescent calyx, and the extreme obliquity given to its mouth by the protraction of the upper tooth. The foliage of all three is alike. 51. Deerim/ia celosioides, R. Br. Ad pagum Hoi-tau, ora occidua ins. Hai-nan, d. 31 Dec, 1865, coll. F. Fagg. 52. Euphorbia Atoto, Forst. In arena ins. Prata, ad oras Chinse merid., Maio, 1858, coll. Wilford : ad Hoi-hau, ins. Hai-nan, vera 1877, leg. Bullock. 53. Euphorbia bifida, Hook. & Aiii. Macaii, in dechvitatibus herbosis ad mare, ipse legi, m. Decembri, 1866. 54. Streblus asper, Lorn'. Juxta Hoi-hau, ins. Hai-nan, 1877, leg. Bullock. 55. Fatoua japo7iica, Bl. Chca \'iculum Ho-au, prov. Can- tonensis, a. 1856, coll. b. Krone, soc. rhenanae apud Vinas missionarius ; in incultis juxta ipsam urbem, autumno 1875, invenit Rev. J. C. Nevin. The rudimentary pistil in the male flowers is usually split to the middle mto two oblong lobes, but is sometimes altogether absent; the anthers are quite white. When ripe, the fruit sphts downwards from the top, and shoots out the putamen elasticaUy to a great distance. The leaves differ in shape in different specimens, and the varieties proposed by Bureau cannot, I think, be distin- guished. Not heretofore recorded fi'om China. 56. Saururm Loureirii, Dene. Ad ripas limosas canalium, Whampoae, legi Maio, 1865, necnon in varus locis juxta Cantonem. There seems no character to keep Turczaninow's Saicriiropsis apart from this. SPICILEGIA FLOE.E SINENSIS. 233 57. Aristolochia Kcem2}feri,Willd. In. Silver Island, Chin-kiang, Maio, 1863, coll. Hay. I have seen no Japanese specimens, and mine is not in good condition, but it seems to agree very well with Duchartre's diagnosis. It has not hitherto been recorded as a native of China. I have another Aristolochia from the woods of the Tsing-yiin pass, prohably allied to A. mclica, Linn., but the leaves, borne on petioles three inches long, are more like those of a Dioscorea, ovate-oblong in contour, 6-7 inches long, 4 inches broad, with a wide sinus at the base, and rounded auricles 1^ inch in length, produced downwards. The capsule is ovoid for 1^ inch, and drawn out at the base into an equally long stipes splitting into as many divisions as the fruit. There are no iiowers, and I cannot venture to characterise the i)lant. 58. Hahenaria sagittifera, Ecbb. fil. Circa Chi-fu, 1873, coll. C. C. Stuhlmann ; prope Ta-chiao-sz, Chinae bor., 1874, unicum specimen invenit Dr. 0. F. a Moellendorff. Only known previously from Japan and Manchuria. 59 . Pollia japonica, Thunb . In silvis supra coenobium buddhicum Fi-loi-tsz, ad fauces fl. North Eiver Tsing-jain dictas, m. Jul. 1865, detexit Samj)soi\; Sept., 1866, coll. Sami)son et Hance. 60. Carex Fioyleana, N. ab E. Cu'ca Amoy, Martio, 1863, coU. C. F. M. de Grijs. Reduced latterly by Dr. Boott, who had formerly considered it distinct, to C. breviculmis, R. Br., from which it differs by the culms shorter in proportion to the leaves, the female spikes usually male at the summit, and the squamae ovate and gradually attenuated into — not broadly shouldered and truncate at the base of — the cusps, which are much shorter, so that the s^Dikes have not the aristate apx^earance of the other. The Chinese specimens agree in aU respects with the beautiful plate (* 111. Carex,' i., t. 19.) 61. Carex tristacJuja, Thunb. In rupibus humidis insulae Danorum, Whampoae, primo inveni, A]}y., 1861; in montibus Pak-wan, supra Cantonem, raram vidit Sampson. The late Dr. Boott determined this as his C. monadelpha, but he subsequently informed me that he considered me right in regarding the latter as identical with Thunberg's species. Schkuhr's figure ('Riedgr. Ww.,' 109) though representing a fragment only, is not uncharac- teristic, but the male spike is erroneously coloured quite blackish. 62. Panicum humile, N. ab E. In agris requietis, Whampo^, ipse primum legi, m. Sept., 1863. The Chinese specimens are precisely similar to those from Ceylon, whence the species had, I believe, only been previously recorded. 63. Pollinia imherbis, N. ab E. In udis secus viam ad montes Pak-wan, extra Cantonem, ducentem, m. Jan., 1868, detexit Sampson. In aspect rather resembhng a dwarfed Leersia than an Andro- pogonea. 64. Ischcpmum? segetum, Trin. Secus fl. Lien-chau, prov. Can- tonensis, Octobri, 1876, coll. Rev. J. C. Nevin. I refer the Chinese grass to this species merely from its agreement with Trinius' brief character ('Mem. Acad. St. Petersb.,' 6e. ser., ii., 294.) It is of a 2h 234 ON LYSIMACHIA CUSPIDATA. decumbent habit, giving out a flowering peduncle at each node ; the spikes are straw-coloured, the fertile glume quite destitute of hairs on the back, and the pedicelled floret tabescent and awnless. 65. Anthistiria caudata, N. abE. In montibus Pak-wan, necnon in collibus demissis ad boream urbis Cantonis sitis, mm. Nov., 1867, Oct., 1868, coll. Sampson et Hance. A remarkably distinct and rare species. QQ. Calamagrostis arunclinacea, Roth. In monte Miao feng shan, Chinae bor., m. Augusto 1874, coll. Dr. 0. a Moellendorff : secus fl. Lien-chau, prov. Cantonensis, m. Oct., 1876, leg, Rev. J. C. Nevin. Though now recorded from the extreme north and south of the empire, I am not aware that this grass has been gathered before in China. 67. Bromiis japojiiciis, Thunb. Juxta Chi-fu, a. 1873, leg. R. Swinhoe. Gathered previously at Kiu-kiang by Mr. Forbes's collector. 68. PolypocUum floccigerum , (i. loriforme, Mett. In rupibus secus fl. Lien-chau, i^rov. Cantonensis, m. Oct., 1876, coll. Rev. J. C. Nevin. I have seen no authentic specimens, but these agree well in dimensions, venation, and the remaining characters, with Mettenius' description. This particular variety had only hitherto been found in Java. 69. Helmmthostachys dulcis, Kaulf. In montosis prov. Can- tonensis rara: specimina debeo benevolenti^e Rev. R. H. Graves. Now first recorded from China. 70. Lijcopodiuin phlegmaria, Linn. Li arboribus silvarum ad Ting-ii-shan, secus fl. West River prov. Cantonensis, d. 10 Julii, 1870, leg. Sampson. China is not mentioned by Spring, in his monograph, amongst the habitats of this plant, as represented in the Hookerian herbarium. Note. — The plant referred in the first fasciculus of these " Spicilegia," — from the description only, — to Pediciilaris Jongifiora, Rudolphi, is, according to M. Maximowicz, a distinct species which he has described under the name of P. chinensis. (' Mel. Biol. Acad. St. Petersb.,' x., 87.) ON LYSIMACHIA CUSPIDATA, Bl., AND LYSIMACHIA CUSPIDATA, Klatt. By Henry F. Hance, Ph.D., F.L.S., Memb. Acad. Nat. Cm-., &c. In a paper which was recently printed in this Journal, I gave a list of the Lyshiiachi(E known to me — from the actual possession of specimens — as occurring in China.* Amongst them was the one figured by Klatt as L. ciLsjndata, Bl., which, as I pointed^ out, ♦ Trimen, * Journ. Bot.,' (n.s.), vi., 357, ON LYSIMACHIA CUSPIDATA. 235 was asserted by the late Prof. Miquel to differ entirely from the Javanese plant. I left it, however, under the name assigned it by the Hamburg botanist, because I possessed no authentic example of the species referred to by Miquel. I have since, through Dr. Scheffer's courtesy, been favoiu'ed with a sx3ecimen, from the Buitenzorg Herbarium, of Blume's plant, labelled, my corre- spondent believes — though he is not quite certain of this — in the author's handwriting. From an examination of this, it is clear that, as Miquel states,* Blume's L. cuspidata is identical with the plant erroneously described and figured by Klatt t as L. uliginosa, Bl. This, with L. evalvis, Wall., L. alter nifolia, Wall, (between which two it should apparently stand), L. adoensis, Hochst. & Steud., and L. Linum-stellatum, Linn., form Klatt's section Asterolinon. I confess there seems to me no adequate grounds for the retention of Link and Hoffmansegg's genus ;| but those who consider the diminutive petals and [usually only) much fewer seeds as sufficient to keep the two last-named species apart, and who think Klatt's divisions — as I do not — generally natural and well limited, might perhaps reserve for the others § the sectional name of Pseiidastero- linon. It certainly does appear impossible to remove Pelletiera verna, A. St. Hil., judging from a comparison merely of St. Hilaire's own figures, jl from L. Linum-stellatum, Linn., of which indeed Baudo surmised it might be only a variety ]*!i though it is acknow- ledged by Klatt, as well as by Endlicher and Duby. But when Sir Joseph Hooker, recognising this, places them together under Asterolinon, thus assigning to this very unstable group species with a 5-lobed corolla and others with three distinct petals, it is perplexing to trace the logical process by which he has been induced to resuscitate Duby's Apochoris, which has really no smgle character but free petals to distinguish it from Lysimachia, a large and ubiquitous genus, embracing plants with considerable diversity both of habit and floral structure, and with which, as it seems to me at least, Klatt with good reason re-combined it."^'* * 'Ann. Mus. Lugd.-Bot.,' iv., 144. + ' Der Gattung Lysimachia,' 39, t. 23. I Which, by some oversight, Le Maout and Decaisne station in the tribe AnagallidecB, distinguished by its circumsciss capsule, or pyxis. (' Traite Eiem. de Bot.,' 219.) § I find the stamens of L. evalvis distinctly connate into a short free cup or ring; those of L. alternifqlia I have not examined: in both the seeds seem, judging only from dissection of the ovary, quite numerous. II ' Ann. Sc. Nat.,' 2e. ser. xi. t. 4, especially the abnormal petal detected by Decaisne, which presumably arose from cohesion, the normal condition in Lysimachia. ^ ' Ann. Sc. Nat.,' 2e. ser. xx., 850. ** There are one or two inaccuracies in the revision of this Order in the * Genera,' which testify to the work having been performed with great haste, doubtless under the pressure of multifarious engagements. E. gr. Primula is stated (ii., 631) to be divided by Duby into two sections; whereas Duby admits five, and Endlicher the two named. Euprecht had perhaps a better conception of the natural subdivisions of Primula than any other writer; if, however, Schott's two sections, approved by Hooker, be admitted, they are undoubtedly insufficient; and a third, SphondyHa, agreeing with the first in the ptyxis of the leaves, and with the second in the abbreviated fruit, must be intercalated. 236 A SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF DIAPHORANTHEMA. The XDlaiit inistakeii by Klatt for Blnme's Lysimachia cuspidata had not, I beheve, been noticed by any previous writer. It has been very fairlj^ described and figured by him/'' though he is mis- taken in supj)osing that it grows in Hongkong, or that Hongkong itself is situated in Northern China. I therefore desire to dedicate it to him, as the first describer, under the name of L. Klattiana. So far as I know, it has only yet been found in Northern and East-Central China, and its nearest relative is apparently L. Alfredi, Hance. A SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF DIAPHORANTHEMA. By J. G. Baker, F.E.S. The large genus Tillandsia, as monographed by the younger Schultes in the second part of the seventh volume of Pioemer and Schultes's ' Systema Vegetabilium,' in 1830, has been much sub- divided of late 3^ears. With the exce^^tion of Catopsis, Griseb. {Fogonospermum, A. Brong.), which differs from Tillandsia materially in the seeds, I prefer to regard the groups which have been sepa- rated (Anoplophytiim , Diaphoranthema, Allardtia, Platystachys, Phytarhiza, Wallisia, and Vriesea) as of not more than sectional value. One of the best marked is Diaphoranthema, characterised by Beer, m 1857 ('Die Familie der Bromeliaceen,' j). 153.) Beer's synopsis of the species is not satisfactory, as out of eight which he defines not more than three will hold good, and there are several others which he does not mention at all. The head-quarters of DiaphorantheDia is in the Argentine territory ; and it was studied carefully a generation ago by the late Mr. Gillies, who gave names to the sx^ecies he distinguished, and sent specimens to Sir W. J. Hooker, but never published them. I propose, therefore, to devote the present paper to a synopsis of the species which I have been able to see in the London herbaria. Genus Tillandsia, Linn. Sub-genus Diaphoranthema, (Beer). — Leaves subterete, per- sistently lepidote up to the toj) on both sides, not condensed into a rosette, but spread over the short, produced simple or forked, densely caespitose stems. Peduncle leafless or obscurely bracteate, sometimes 0. Flowers erect, 1-3, crowded if more than one. Petals violet, oblanceolate, shortly exserted from the calyx, not scaled at the base of the claw. Genitalia shorter than the petals. 1. T. hryoides, Griseb., in Lorentz PI. Argent. Exsic, No. 128. T. coarctata. Gillies MSS. Stems 1-3 in. long, simx^le, or little or copiously branched. Leaves very tightly X3acked on the stems, 50-100 to a fully-develoi)ed simj^le stem, ascending, adpressed to the stem or rather sj^reading, subterete from a clasping lanceolate base one-twelfth of an inch broad, narrowed gradually from the top of the base to a tine j)oint, the whole blade :^-^-in. long, * ' Dlv Gatt. Lysimachia,' 36, t. 20. A SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF DIAPHORANTHEMA. 237 clothed with thin ghttering adpressecl x3ale-brown tomentum. Peduncle 0, or very short. Flowers 1-3. Bracts and sepals similar in shape and texture, i-i-in. long, thinly lepidote, distinctly ribbed. Corolla not seen. Cylindiical capsule under an inch long, the linear valves half-a-hne broad. On trees and bushes at the foot of the Cordillera, near Mendoza, Gillies. Cordova, Lorejitz, 12S I South Chili, W. Lobb ! South Brazil, Glaziou, 3124 ! Parana, Christie ! General habit of Lyco- poditwi Selago. AVhat I take to be a stunted form of the same species has tightly imbricated, lanceolate, dirty-white, thicker leaves, not more than ^-^-in. long. 2. T. tricholepis, Baker, n. sp. General habit of T. bryoides. Leafy stems reaching a length of 2-3 inches. Leaves as tightly packed as in the last, rather longer (f— |^-in. long), narrowed gradually from a clasping lanceolate base to a fine lian-like point, ascendmg, ^ erect or a little curved, densely scabrous throughout, with white, glittering, deflexed, acuminate lanceolate scales. Peduncle 1-2 inches long, 1-2-flowered, flexuose, with several closely-appressed, lanceolate bracts. Sepals and bracts oblong-lanceolate, naked, striated, ^-i-in. long, the former deltoid at the tip. Capsule cylindrical, twice as long as the calyx, its valves about half-a-line broad. Andes of Bolivia ; on bushes, in the temperate region about Sorata, Poquerani, and San Pedro, at an elevation of 2500 to 2650 metres, Mandon, 1179 ! 3. T. pmilla, Gillies MSS. Stems under an inch long. Leaves about a dozen to a simple stem, squarrose or ascending, ^^ i-^-in. long, terete from a clasping lanceolate base, ^-line in thickness where they leave the stem, not hau'-like at the point, densely clothed throughout with loose, chaffy, lanceolate, whitish, lepidote scales. Peduncle none, the solitary flowers springing from the base of the leaves at the end of the leafy stems. Sepals i-in. long. Corolla and capsule not seen. Mendoza, on bushes. Gillies! May be a very dwarf reduced form of the next. 4. T. jjrojnnqua, C. Gay, ' Fl. Chil.,' vol. vi., p. 15. Stems 2-3 in. long, densely caespitose, often copiously branched. Leaves ^ 20-30 to a fully-developed simple stem, f-f -in. long, ascending or si^reading, subterete above the lanceolate clasping bas^, half-a-Hne in diameter above the base, not hair-pointed at the tip, the face distinctly deeply- channelled from the tip downwards, the whole surface densely coated with loose, chaffy, pale-brown, or whitish lepidote scales. Flowers often many to a stem, solitary, sessile, or shortly peduncled. Bract oblong, lepidote, ^-in. long, tightly clasping the calyx. Sepals lanceolate, naked, acute, ^-in. long. Capsule cylindrical, i-f -in. long, its valves ^-line broad. Andes of Chili, Cuming, 167 ! Bridges, 534 ! Herb. Reed! Casa Cancha, Willies'' Exjjeditiun. Cordoba, Lore^itz, 129 ! Andes of BoUvia, temperate region, 4000 metres, Mandon, 1181 ! T. laniiginusa, Gillies MSS., from trees and bushes at the foot of the Cordillera, near Mendoza, is evidently a form of the same 238 A SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF DIAPHORANTHEMA. species, with more densely lepidote leaves, and a slender peduncle above an incli long. 5. T. rectangula, Baker. T. propinqua var. rectamjula, Griseb. in Lorentz PL Argent. Exsic, No. 126-127. Leafy stems simple or forked, about an inch long. Leaves about a dozen to a fully- develoi^ed simple stem, half-an-inch long, linear- subulate from a clasping lanceolate base, sj)reading, half-a-line broad where they leave the stem, narrowed gradually from the base to the point, deeply channelled on the lower part of the face, thinly lepidote all over, with one deep lateral • groove on each side in the lower half. Peduncle filiform, terminal, 1 -flowered, about an inch long, with sometimes a bract at the middle. Bract that clasps the flower oblong, ^-in. long. Calyx ^-in. long ; sepals obtuse. Capsules half-an-inch long ; valves a line broad. Argentine territory at Cordoba, Lorentz, 126 ! 127 ! Midway between propinqua and rigida. 6. T. capillaris, Ruiz & Pavon, ' Fl. Peruv.,' vol. iii., p. 42, t. 271, fig. c. Diaphoranthema capillaris, Beer Brom., p. 153. Leafy stems 2-3 in. long. Leaves about 20 to a fully-developed simple stem, subterete from a clasping lanceolate base, about an inch long, one-twelfth of an inch in diameter above the base, ascending, not hau'-like at the tip, densely clothed with loose spreading, pale- brown lanceolate, lepidote scales. Peduncles 1-2-flowei'^d, filiform, 2-3 in. long. Bract glossy, lanceolate, ^-in. long, tightly clasping the calyx. Sepals lanceolate, naked, ^-in. long. Capsule cylin- drical, under an inch long, its valves half-a-line broad. Andes of Peru, Pavon! The above description is taken from Pavon's copious type- specimens at the British Museum. 1 cannot separate fi-om this specifically T. viresceyis, Euiz & Pavon, 'Fl. Peruv.,' iii., jd. 43, t. 270, fig. 5 {piaphoranthema virescens. Beer), of which there are no type- specimens in the Museum herbarium. To the same species, I think, belong T. incana, Gillies MSS., from trees and bushes at the foot of the Cordillera of Mendoza, and a plant gathered by Mandon (No. 1178) in the temperate region of the Andes of Bolivia, at an elevation of 2700 metres. T. capillaris is about midway betw^een recurvata and propinqua, differing from the former by its shorter, stouter, ascending, more densely lepidote leaves. 7. T. retorta, Griseb., in Lorentz PL Argent. Exsic, No. 125; T. ccBspitosa, Gillies MSS., non Leconte. Stems 1-2 inches long, simple or forked, bearing about a dozen squarrose rigidly coriaceous leaves, which are about an inch long, clasping the stem by a dilated lanceolate base, |^-line in diameter above the base, narrowed gradually to a fine point, clothed throughout with rather spreading, minute, lepidote scales. Peduncle none. Bracts and sepals lan- ceolate, acute, ^-in. long. Capsule above an inch long, with valves ^-in. broad. Mendoza, Gillies! Qoxdioha,, Lorentz, 12b \ Hd^hii oi recurvata, from which it differs by its shorter, stouter, much more rigidly- coriaceous leaves, with a thinner coating of scales, and by its sessile flower and very large capsules. A SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF DIAPHORANTHEMA. 239 8. T. erecta, Gillies MSS. Leafy stems rigidly erect, simple or forked, 1^-2 in. long. Leaves about 20 to a simjDle stem, linear-subterete from a dilated lanceolate base, ^-^ in. broad, erect or rather spreading, 1-1^ in. long, one-twelfth of an inch in diameter at the top of the dilated base, prominently ribbed vertically on the back in the lower part, narrowed gradually from the top of the dilated base to a subobtuse point, coated throughout with minute, adpressed, peltate, lepidote scales, with a white rim and a brown centre. Peduncle naked, 1-flowered, stiffly erect, 1-1^ in. long. Bracts and sepals naked, lanceolate, ribbed, ^-m. long. Capsule cylindrical, twice as long as the sepals. On trees and bushes at the foot of the Cordillera, near Mendoza, Gillies'. T. rigida, Gillies MSS., is obviously a form of the same species without any peduncle. The species is marked in the group by its stout, crowded, suberect, rigidly-coriaceous, thinly-lepidote leaves, strongly ribbed on the back in the lower portion. 9. T. recurvata, Linn. ! Schultes fil. ' Syst. Veg.,' vol. vii., part 2, p. 1202. Diaphoranthema recurvata, Beer, Brom., p. 156; T. unifiora, H. B. K. Nov. Gen., i., p. 290; DiapJioranthema uniflora, Beer ; Tillandsia Landbeckii, Philippi, in ' Linnaea,' vol. xxxiii., p. 248. Densely caespitose simple or forked stems 1-2 in. long. Leaves 12-15 to a fully- developed simple stem, terete from a dilated, clasiDing, lanceolate base, spreading, 2-3 in. long, ^-hne in diameter at the top of the base, clothed with dense, spreading, persistent, lepidote scales. Peduncle filiform, 1-3- flowered, 2-5-in. long, usually naked, rarely furnished with a bract apart from the flower. Bracts lanceolate, acute, |-|-in. long, more or less hairy. Sepals obtuse, ^-in. long. Capsule |-1 in. long, its valves about one-twelfth of an inch broad. This, the type-species of the group, is the most widely-spread of all the Tillandsias, as it extends from Florida and Mexico to Buenos Ayres and Chili, reaching in the Andes an elevation of 8000 feet. T. monostachys, Gillies MSS., which grows upon the Cactuses used as fences at Buenos Ayres, is evidently simply a dwarf form of recurvata, with leaves not more than 1-1 i in. long, short peduncles, and generally solitary flowers. There are specimens of the species both in the Linnean and Gronovian herbaria. 10. T. andicola, Gillies MSS. Leafy stem produced to a length of about 8 inches, flexuose, bearmg about 20 leaves. Leaves rigidly coriaceous, subterete from a clasping, lanceolate base, flexuose, the lower ones spreading, the upper ascending, 1-2 in. long, the blade about one-sixteenth of an inch in diameter at the top of the dilated base, narrowed gradually from the middle to a subobtuse point, not perceptibly ribbed vertically on the back in the lower part, the whole lamina thinly coated with very small, fine, narrow, rather spreading, whitish, lepidote scales. Peduncle 1-flowered, bractless, lepidote throughout, above an inch long. Bract lanceolate, |-in. long, pilose. Sepals naked, lanceolate, acute, ^-in. long, strongly-ribbed vertically. Capsule not seen. Andes of Mendoza, Gillies ! Longer stems than recurvata. 240 A SYNOPSIS OF THE SPECIES OF DIAPHORANTHEMA. Leaves stouter and much more rigidly coriaceous in texture, with the vestiture almost pubescent. 11. T. myosura, Griseb., in Lorentz PL Argent. Exsic, No. 122. Stout produced simple or copiously forked, leafy stems l|-3 in. long. Leaves 12-20 to a fully developed simple leafy stem, subterete from a dilated lanceolate base, spreading, reaching a length of 5-6 inches, rigidly coriaceous in texture, ^-in. in diameter at the top of the dilated clasping base, narrowed gradually from the middle to a subobtuse tip, densely coated throughout with reflexed dirty white short pubescence. Peduncle 1-3-flowered, 2-4 in. long, pubescent, with usually a bract about the middle. Bract at the base of the flower pubescent, oblong-lanceolate, acute, ^-| in. long. Sepals obtuse, glabrous, under ^-in. long. Capsule cylindrical, 1-li in. long, with valves one-twelfth of an inch broad. Andes of Bolivia, on trees, in rocky ground, near Lorata, between San Pedro and Coaconi, at an elevation of about 8000 feet above sea-level, Manclon, 1180 ! Cordoba, Lorentz, 122 ! Habit of recur cata, with very different, stouter, rigidly-coriaceous leaves, and different vestiture. 12. T. fiisca, Baker, n. sp. Stout, woody, leafy stem, ^ foot long, ^-in. diameter at the base, with several spreading or ascending branches. Dilated base of the leaves deltoid, ^-^ in. broad. Leaves spreading, 1^-2 in. long, subterete. ^-V-i in. broad at the top of the dilated base, distinctly grooved down the face, narrowed from the middle to a subobtuse point, densely coated with spreading, linear, pale-brown scales. Peduncle about an inch long, 2-3-flowered, with a large lanceolate bract at the middle. Bracts lanceolate, i in. long. Sepals lanceolate, glabrous, nearly as long as the bract. CaiDsule not seen. Obragillo ; a single specimen in Mr. Bentham's herbarium, gathered by the United States Exiiloring Expedition under Captain Wilkes. Well-marked from all the rest by its suffruticose habit and deltoid leaf-bases. 13. T. Gilliesii, Baker. T. compressa, Gillies MSS., non Bertero. Stems 1-2 in. long, simi)le or forked. Leaves distichous, squarrose, linear, about a dozen to a simple stem, i-2 in. long, ^-in. broad at the clasping base, narrowed gradually from the base to the point, rigidly- coriaceous, deeply channelled down the face,' measuring ^-m. in the lower part from the keel to the margin, densely finely lepidote on both sides all over. Peduncle 1-2- flowered, reaching a length of 4-5 in., sometimes suppressed, sometimes furnished with a small clasping bract at the middle. Bract that clasps the flower oblong, pointed, i-f-in. long. Calyx as long as the bract. Capsule cylindrical, an inch long. Foot of the Cordillera of Mendoza, Gillies! Marked at a glance by the distichous arrangement of its stout rigidly coriaceous leaves. 14. T. undulata, Baker, n. sp. Leafy stems cffispitose, very short, ^-f in. long, all simple. Leaves 12-20 to a stem, ascending, crowded, f-1 in. long, subterete, fi'om a clasping lanceolate base, not hair- tipped, densely clothed all over with minute spreading CONSPECTUS POLYG ALARUM EUROP.EARUM. 241 chaffy scales. Pedmicle 2-3 in. long, bearing 3-4 lanceolate striated clas^Ding bracts. Spike laxly 3-6-flowered ; racliis veiy flexuose ; bracts J in. long, lanceolate, tiglitly clasping the calyx, thinlj'- lepidote. Calyx ^ in., naked ; sepals lanceolate. Capsule glabrous, cylindrical, 1-1^ in. long ; valves |- line broad. Paraguay, at the mouth of the Eio Spane, near Villa Conception, B a] ansa, 619 ! Calyx and capsule of T. reciirvata, from which it differs by its short leaves, numerous flowers, and remarkably zigzag spike- rachis. Excluded Species. Diaphorantheina versicolor, Beer, 'Brom.,' p. 155, founded on a figure of Sloane's, is Tillandsia [Plati/stachys) tenuifulia, Linn. D. suhidata. Beer loc. cit., founded on ' Fl. Flum.,' vol. iii., t. 127, is T. [Anoplojihijtiim) stricta, Soland. D. hifiora. Beer, p. 156, is T. {Platystachys) hijiora, Euiz & Pavon. D. triflora, Beer, p. 155, founded on a figure of ' Flora Flumi- nensis ' (tab. 134), much too vague to be safely determinable, belongs probably to section Anoplophytum, and is clearly not a Diaphorantliema. CONSPECTUS POLYGALAEUM EUEOP^AEUM. ^ ^ y y By Alfred W. Bennett, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. ' 7>^ The review of the British species- and subspecies of Polygala which I contributed to the number of the * Journal of Botany ' for June, 1877 (vol. vi., p. 168), may be fitly followed by a sketch of the European species of the same genus. With the exception of the diagnoses in the 'Floras' of the various countries of Europe, the only general review of the European species with which I am acquainted is by H. G. Eeichenbach, fil., in the 18th volume of the 'Icones Florae Germanicae et Helvetica, ' (1858); there is, also, one of the species of Western and Central Europe, by Dumortier, in the 'Bulletin de la Societe Eoyale de Botanique de Belgique,' vol. vii., 1868, pp. 335-345 ; and the admhable one of the Italian species, by Caruel, in the 1st volume of the ' Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano ' for 1869. The chief seat of the genus being the Tropics of both hemispheres, where only, besides the Cape of Good Hope, they attain the size of shrubs, the number of European species is small compared with that of most other similar areas, 20 out of about 300. New Zealand is the only country of any extent entirely wanting in the genus, and, indeed, in the Order. Accepting the Linnean limitations of the genus Polygala, it is the only one of 17 genera belonging to the Natural Order Polygalacece represented in Europe. Of the 20 European species, 13 belong to a group or subgenus which is distinctly European in its type ; the remaining 7 species represent three distinct types, 5 of them 2i 242 CONSPECTUS POLYGALAEUM EUROP.^ARUM. belonging to a group characteristically Asiatic in its distribution ; while the remaining two species are monotypic or nearly so, and have by some been erected into distinct genera. My materials, in addition to those named m the review referred to above, have been specimens kindly forwarded to me by Prof. Caruel, of Pisa, Mr. Gr. C. Joad, and others. The following is a brief statement of the salient characteristics of the European species. There is at present, as far as I am aware, no satisfactory classification into sub-genera of the very numerous species (upwards of 300) included in the genus ; the one in the first volume of DeCandolle's 'Prodi-omus' (1824) is founded on very unsatisfactory characters. The minor divisions in Eeichenbach's and Caruel's monographs may, for the most part, be accepted, but not so those in Dumortier's i)aper. A classifica- tion which brings together P. cumosa and (KVi/ptera, while separating P. vuhjaris, serpyllacea, and oxuptera into three separate divisions, stands self- condemned as an attempt at a natural system. Espe- cially unfortunate is his section of " Oppositifolige," including P. mutahilis and serpyllacea. Good tribal characters ma}^ no doubt, be in some instances drawn from the character and arrangement of the foliage in this genus. In my account of the Brazilian species, in Martius's ' Flora Brasiliensis,' I have collected into a special division all those species in which some or all of the leaves are verticillate, and which a^Di^ear to constitute a very natural group absolutely confined to the New World. But in the Old World it is doubtful whether any of the species have truly opposite leaves, even if we include the P. opposiiifolia of the Cape, in which most of them are apparently so. In P. serpyllacea [depressa) it is not usual for even the lowest leaves to be exactly o^Dposite ; and I am entirely unacquainted with any form answering to Dumortier's description of his P. mutahilis, in which he describes all the leaves on the sterile branches as opposite. Pol YGAL ARUM Europe ARUM Clavis. I. Sectio Eu-POLYGALA. A. Perennes. Antherae sessiles. a. Ahi9 corollae tubum asquantes vel eo lougiores. '•' Flores cferulei, rosei, vel albi. a. Bracteae quam pedicellos multo breviores ; racemus itaque non comosus. 1. P. VULGARIS. Non cfEspitosa ; alas ovales. 2. P. CALCAREA. CtTsxHtosa ; alae capsula latiores. 8. P. AMARA. Ca3si)itosa ; ala3 capsula angus- tiores. 4. P. FOROJULENsis. Subca}spitosa ; ahc sub- rotunda? ; racemus abbreviatas. h. Bracteas pedicellum aequantes; racemus i nque sub- coiuosus. 5. P. Nic^ENsis. Ala3 subrotunda3. 6. P. Pkeslii. Alaj anguste oblongae. CONSPECTUS POLYGALAKUM EUKOPiEARUM. 243 c. Bracte£e pedicello longiores ; racemus itaque comosus. 7. P. coMosA. Alffi 0 vales. ** Flores flavi. 8. P. FLAVEscENs. Eacemus elongatus ; alae acummatse. /3. Ala9 corollae tubo longiores. * CaiDsula sessilis. 9. P. VENULOSA. Alse oblique elliptic^. "^'^ Capsula stipitata. 10. P. MAJOR. Alae ovale s. 11. P. ANATOLiCA. AlsB aiiguste ovatae, ciliatse. 12. P. EosEA. Bracteae laterales ovat«. B. Annua. Filamenta superne libera. 13. P. MONSPELiACA. CauUs subsimplex ; alae oblongaB, acuminatae. II. Sectio Pleuranthus. A. Antherse sessiles. Perennis. 14. P. supiNA. Al^ obovatffi, basi cuneatas. B. Filamenta superne libera. Perennes. a. Arillodium 3-appendiculatum. 15. P. siBiEicA. Eacemus multiflorus ; alae sub- berbaceae. 16. P. suBUNiFLOEA. Eacemus 1-3 florus. Exigua. /3. Arillodium inappendiculatum. 17. P. EUPESTRis. Alae obovatae, sub-herbacese. C. Filamenta superne libera. Annua. 18. P. ExiLis. Exigua. Arillodium inappendi- culatum. III. Sectio CnAMiEBUxus. 19. P. Cham^buxus. IV. Sectio Beachyteopis. 20. P. MICEOPHYLLA. Sectio I. Eu-POLYGALA (mild.) [Polygalon, DC, ex x>arte). Eacemi terminales ; bracteae ante anthesim decidu*. Sepala persistentia, omnia discreta ; alae petaloidese. Petala lateralia elongata, cum carina plusquam dimidio coalita ; carina galeata, sub-t}.'ilol3a, ad dorsum cristam magnam fimbriatam gerens. Antherae plerumque sessiles, ad summum andropliori postice secti insertae. Ovarium glabrum vel ciliatum ; stylus elongatus ; stigma rostriforme vel cuculliforme vel rarius infundibuliforme. Capsula anguste alata, arillodium parvum, duabus appendicibus brevibus munitum, vel sub -inappendiculatum. This section, which may be regarded as the typical one of the genus, is extremely well-marked by its slender herbaceous habit, terminal racemes, and coloured wing-sepals. With the exception ( 244 CONSPECTUS POLYGALARUM EUROP^ARUM. of the small and very distinct subsection which comxDrises P. nums- peUaca only, they are all perennial ]3lants, with the anthers quite sessile on the split filament- sheath, and the arillode of the ripe seed fm-nished with three white fleshy appendages, less than half the length of the seed. The section is very distinctly European in its distribution, 13 out of the 20 European species belonging to it, while none extend beyond Western and Northern Asia and Noi'th Africa, and only two species of the section, P. papilionacea and P. pruinusa/''' both natives of Asia Minor, are not found within the limits of the Continent. Both these species have been erro- neously included in the European flora. The specimens bearing the name P. papilionacea in the Kew Herbarium (Munro, No. 84) are distinctly P. major, while the P. pniinosa of Boiss., 'Diag.,' i., 1, 8, included two dift'erent forms, subsequently separated by the author ; the true P. pruinosa being confined to Phrygia, while the Grecian plant was subsequently (' Diag.,' ii., 1, 58) re-named P. niccrensis var. tomentella. A. Perennials ; anthers sessile ; stigma hooded or beaked, the anterior lobe the largest ; arillode 3-appendiculate. a. Wing-sepals equal to or longer than corolla-tube. * Flowers blue, rose-coloured, or white. a. Bracts much shorter than the pedicel; the raceme, therefore, not comose. 1. PoLYGALA VULGARIS, Limi. P. caulibus ascendentibus vel decum- bentibus ; foliis ovalibus vel lanceolatis, imis minoribus, summis etiam lineari-lanceolatis ; racemis terminalibus, pyramidalibus, sat densifloris ; bracteis lateralibus quam pedicellum dimidio brevioribus ; alis ovalibus vel obovatis, quam capsulam parum longioribus sed distincte latioribus, corollam subaequantibus, venis anastomosantibus ; stylo acuto ; capsula obcordata, subsessili, quam alas persistentes virides plerumque angustiore brevioreque ; seminibus hu'sutis ; arillodio tribus brevibus obtusis appendicibus sub- aequalibus munito. One of the most widely distributed species of the genus, occurring throughout Europe with the exception of Sicily (according to Caruel), where it is apparently replaced by P. Preslii, and as far north as Scandinavia ; in North Africa (not, however, named in Ball's 'Spicilegium Flone Maroccanse '), and in western temperate and subarctic Asia; growing in grassy situations, heaths, and hill- sides, to a considerable altitude ; flowers most usually blue, though not unfrequently white, pink, lilac, or purple. It is very difficult to define the limits of this species and P. calcarea, on the one hand, while in the south of Europe the more luxuriant forms appear to run insensibly into P. comosa. Of the numerous forms There is, also, in the Kew Herbarium, a single specimen of an apparently distinct unileseribed species belonging to this section, from Persia, bearing the MS. name, P. jjemica. CONSPECTUS POLYGALARUM EUEOP^ARUM. 245 to which distinct names have been given, some might be considered as well-raarkedj'sub-species, while others do not even merit to be regarded as varieties. The synonymy is, in many cases, very obscure ; but the following list will,^it is beheved, be fomid to exhaust all the noteworthy forms. Var. l.jfenuma, Engl.'Bot., ed. 3, tom. ii., p. 35; A.W. Benn. inJourn.Bot., 1877, p. 169; P. vuh/aris a. vera, DC, Prodr., i., 325 ; subsp. vulgaris proper, var. 1, Hook., Stud. Flor., ed. 2, p. 48; P. vulgaris, Linn, sp., 986; DC., Prodr., i., 324; Eeich. PI. crit., i., 16 ; Koch, Fl. Germ., 99 ; Gr. et God., Fl. Fr., i., 195; Boiss., Fl. Or., i., 476; Led., Fl. Boss, i., 270; Bert., Fl. Ital., vii., 314; Boiss., Voy. Bot. Esp.,h.,81; Gris.,Fl.Eum.,i.,239; Fries., Fl. Scand., 38; Dmrt., Prodi'. Fl.Belg., 31 ; Benth., Handb.Brit. Fl.,i., 99 ; Hook., Stud. FL, 46 ; Car., in Nuov. Giorn. Bot. It., i., 23; Dmrt., in Soc. Bot. Belg., 1868, p. 344. Caulibus erectis vel ascendentibus, rectis; foliis supernis lanceolatis; racemis 10-20 flor. ; bractea centrali X3edicellum florentem quasi aequante ; alis oblongo-obovatis, capsula latioribus, venis copiose anastomosantibus; bracteis, alis, capsulaque eciliatis. Figs. Eeich., PL Crit., L, t. 25; Ic. Flor. Germ, et Helv., t. mcccxlvL, f. 1; Oed., FL Dan., t. 516 (teste DC); Benth., Handb. Brit. Flor., L, t. 124 ; Eng. Bot., ed. 3, t. clxxxv. ; Journ. Bot., 1877, t. 189, f. 1 (ala, pistillum, semenque.) No doubt the most widely- distributed form of the species, though probably not reaching so high an elevation as var. depressa. P. vulgaris, var. parvijiora, Coss. et Germ., Par., 72, Eeich. Ic, t. mcccxlvi. f . 3 ; P. vulgaris y. minor, Led., FL Eoss, i., 271, sunt formae haud constantes, floribus minoribus, qusB in Gallia et Eossia crescunt. P. duhia, Bellynck, Fl. Nam., p. 27, Dmrt., in Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg., 1868, p. 344, est forma varietatis typicse aHs pauUo angustioribus. Var. 2. depressa, Engl. Bot., 3rd ed., vol. ii., p. 38; Bab. Man., 7th ed., p. 44; Hook. Stud. Flor., 2nd ed., p. 49 ; Var. 6., Fries Nov. FL Suec. 223 ; A.W. Benn. in Journ. Bot., 1877, p. 169 ; P. depressa, Wenderoth, Schrift. d. Ges. Nat. Marburg, p. 1 ; Eeich. Ic, vol. xviiL, p. 90; Gr. et God., FL Fr., i., 196; Koch. Fl. Germ., 99; P. serpgllacea, Weihe, Flora, 1826, p. 745 ; P. serpyllifolia, Fischer-Ooster, Flora, 1854, p. 98 (non Poir.) ; P. mutahilis, Dmi-t. Prodr. Fl. Belg., p. 31 ; P. hadensis, Schimp., in Spenn. Frib., iii., p. 867 (teste Dumortier) ; P. amara y. cespitosa, DC. Prodr., L, 325. Caulibus elongatis, tenuibus, flexuosis; foliis parvis, imis S8epius oppositis vel sub-oppositis ; floribus in racemo paucioribus minoribusque quam in var. 1 ; bractea centrali quam pedicellum florentem breviore ; alis latis, venis vix anastomosantibus ; arillodii appendicibus brevibus, obtusis. 246 CONSPECTUS POLYOALAKUM KUKOP^ARUM. Figs. Wender, I.e., t. 1 ; Reich, I.e., t. mcccxlvii., f. 1 ; Engl. Bot., t. clxxxvii. ; Coss. et Germ. Par. Atl., t. viii. f. B. ; Journ. Bot., 1877, t. 189, f. 2 (ala, iDistillum, semenqne.) Differs from var. 1 chiefly in its more wiry and slender habit and the tendency of the lower leaves on the branches, and especially those of the sterile branches, to be nearly or quite opposite ; the flowers are also somewhat smaller and fewer, and the veins of the wing- sepals rather straighter and less anastomosing ; the habitat is also distinctly more heathy and swampy. It appears to be very generally distributed throughout Continental Europe and the British Isles. Var. 3. ciliata, Engl. Bot., 3rd ed., vol. ii., p. 36 ; Bab. Man., 7th ed., p. 44; Hook. Stud. Flor., 2nd ed., p. 48; A. W. Benn. in Journ. Bot., 1877, p. 170; P. ciliata, Lebel in Gr. et God. El. Fr., i., 195 ; Reich. Ic, xviii., p. 90 (non Linn.) Caulibus tenuibus, flexuosis ; alls, et ssepe quoque bracteis, pedicello, capsulaque, ciliatis. Figs. Reich. I.e., t. mcccxlvi., f. 5; Journ. Bot., 1877, t. 189, f. 3 (ala.) Scarcely distinguishable from var. 2 except in the ciliation of the wings and other parts of the flower, a character which may very probably not be constant. It is recorded from isolated localities in Germany, France, Spain, and England ; but may probably be widely distributed through Central, Western, and Northern Europe. Var. 4. oxijptera, Reich. Ic, xviii., 90 ; Koch Fl. Germ., 99 ; Engl. Bot., 3rd ed., ii., 36 ; Bab. Man., 7th ed., p. 44 ; Hook. Stud. Flor., 2nd ed., p. 48; A. W. Benn. in Journ. Bot., 1877, p. 170; P. oxyptsra, Reich. PL Crit., i., 25; Koch Syn., ed. 1, 91; Fries Nov. Fl. Suec, 224 ; Fl. Scan., 59 ; Dmrt. Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg., 1868, p. 344; P. angus- tata, Schur Fl. Trans., 89 ; P. monspeliaca, Willd. (teste Reich.); non DC. ; P. dunensis (?), Dmrt. in Bull. Bot. Soc. Belg., 1868, p. 344. Caulibus debilibus ; foliis caulinis linearibus ; floribus parvis, distantibus, demum pendulis ; alis angustis, mcmbranaceis, quam capsulam maturam Ion. gioribus et latioribus ; stylo elongato ; capsula infra rotun- data, emarginata, arillodii appendicibus brevibus, obtusis. Figs. Reich. PL Crit., L, f. 46-49; Ic, t. mcccxlvi., f. 2; E. B. S., 2827; Engl. Bot., t. clxxxvL ; Journ. Bot., 1877, t. 189, f. 4 (ala, pistillum, semenque.) . Easily recognised, in its extreme form, by its smaller, more distant and deflexed flowers, and its longer style, together with the narrower wing-sej^als, which last character this variety shares with a narrow-winged form of P. vulyaris-gemiina, often mistaken for it. Its habitat appears to be somewhat arenaceous ; it has been recorded from Germany, France, and the British Isles. (To he eontinued . J SHORT NOTES. 247 SHORT NOTES. Lathyrus hiesutus, L., in Kent. — I found this species in a wood close to Sonthborongh, near Timbridge Wells. It was growing along the roadside for about forty yards, and for about ten yards into the wood. When I first noticed it, three years ago, it was not plentiful, but this year there is a good deal. Growing with it are Vicia gracilis in great quantity, and a few j)lants of Lathyrus Xissolia and Vicia hirsuta. — William Fawcett. Carex capillaris, L., in Gordale. — I am glad to be able to add to the twelve comities and vice-counties enumerated in ' Topo- graphical Botany,' for this graceful little Carex, a thirteenth comital division — Mid- West Yorkshire. It was discovered here only a few days ago, by Mr. William West, of Bradford, a promising young botanist; and yesterday I had the pleasure of seeing the. plant myself; so that little uncertainty can now rest upon either name or station. It grows on the terrace-like mural scar of mountain limestone in Gordale (near Malham), at an alti- tude of about a thousand feet, on the left side of the gorge as it is ascended, above the great slope of debris, but about ten to twenty feet below the narrow plain of turf there crowning the summit of the precipitous cliffs. From the nature of the soil and subjacent rock, combined with the elevation, I have long looked for this 'Oarex turning uj) on the Craven Scars ; but although I have explored Gordale myself many times, the luck of discovering it has fallen (as it so often appears to do) to a comparative tyro. Like the Helianthemum canum found on the Malham Cove Scars, two miles distant, the Carex must be very local. The other rarity of these Scars so often found accompanying the Cistus and the Carex — I refer to Potentilla alpestris — is much more abundant and less restricted in its area than the other two ; and I may say that the same is the case in Upper Teesdale, where the Carex is known in three stations, the Cisius in one only, and the Potentilla in nme. Until now the Cronkley Fell locality for Carex capillaris has been the most southerly and least elevated known in Great Britain. Gordale is somewhere about forty miles still further south, and the altitude at which the sedge grows about two hundi'ed feet lower. Two other plants, rarely found at a like elevation, also occur in Gordale, within the limits of the su]3eragrarian zone (above 900 feet), viz., Hypericum montanum and Ehawnus cathar- ticus ; s ; that in this locality, owing to favourable local circum- stances, related doubtless to rock-nature and climate, the flora of two regions, alpine and agrarian, not merely meet, but con- spicuously intermingle. Lowland species ascend higher, and montane si)ecies descend lower, in the Craven district than in any other part of West Yorkshire. The Carex "find" comes just in time for inclusion in the Flora forming volume second of * West Yorkshire,' although of necessity unmentioned in the list of 248 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Gordale species given intercurrently with physical geography description in the first vokime of that work, just issued. — F. Arnold Lees. Arum italicum, Mill., in Cornwall. — Mr. J. Ealfs, of Penzance, has determined the Arum in several localities in West Cornwall to be A. italicum. It grows in Love Lane, close to Penzance ; at Trereife, by the road to the Land's End, abundantly; and in three or four spots between Leland and St. Ives. The ordinary species, A. maculatum, however, also occurs ; but Mr. Ealfs has not been able to visit aU the recorded stations, so as to trace the actual distribution of each species ; he has not seen A. maculatum nearer Penzance than at Marazion ; it also occurs near Helston and Truro. A. italicum grows in more shady spots than A. maculatum. This is a very interesting determination, and will necessitate a search throughout the West of England. In Jersey and Guernsey, as stated in * J. Bot.,' 1871, p. 200, A. italicum appears to be the only species ; at least during my short visit the other species could not be detected. — Henry Trimen. Carex digitata, L., in Derbyshire. — When describing Carex ornithojjuda as a British plant (' J. Bot.,' 1875, p. 195), it was mentioned that a specimen of C. digitata from Mansal Dale existed in Sowerby's herbarium, but that the species had not been observed in the county for many years. Mr. Whitehead now informs me of its rediscovery this summer in the same Dale, by Messrs. Percival and Rogers, and has kindly forwarded a specimen. With reference to C. ornithopuda, it is stated in Messrs. Davis & Lees' ' West Yorkshh'e' (i. p. 254) that this s^Decies was "known under the name of digitata in Salt's time, seventy-five years ago," and recently rediscovered. — Henry Trimen. Sxtract!5 antr Nottcts of ISoofes ^ iIErttto(rs5. REPORT OF THE HERBARIUM OF THE ROYAL GARDENS, KEW, FOR 1877. By Sir J. D. Hooker, K.C.S.L, &c. The new building for the accommodation of the Herbarium was completed in the autumn, and the collections moved in without its being found necessary to close the building for use during even a single day. In the old building the principal changes have been the formation of two new libraries, about forty feet long, on the first and second floors, by throwing together five smaller rooms in each. This will allow the library to be re-arranged on the first and second floors in a compact and accessible manner, instead of NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 249 having the books scattered as formerly all over the building. Entirely new shelving has also been provided of a uniform height and pattern. The most important collections received during the past year have been : — 1. The Indian herbarium of Mr. C. B. Clarke, which is a most munificent addition to our ah'eady unrivalled collections illus- trating the flora of our Indian empire. This herbarium contains 25,000 numbers, representing about 5000 species. It was collected in the following provinces : — Plains of Bengal, Khasia, and Chit- tagong hills, Chota Nagpore, Dalhousie and Chumba, Kashmir to the Karakorum, Nilgheries. It contains a large number of field- notes, the exact locality and elevation of every plant, and some rough botanic analyses. 2. An herbarium of exceptional interest and extent, collected in tropical northern Africa by Dr. G. Schweinfiu'th, and containing about 700 species. 3. A very fine series of chiefly N. Asiatic and Japanese plants, 2000 in number, from the Imperial Garden of St. Petersburg. The most important contributions are especially noticed below under the different geographical headings. The figures in brackets denote the number of species received from each contributor. Europe. — Bornet, Dr. E. ; AlgcB (4). Braithwaite, Dr. ; British Sphagna (purchased, 52). BruxeUes, Jardin Bot. de I'Etat, per M. Crepin; Cryptogams (1985). Burbidge, F. W. ; lithographs (12). Cooke, M. C.; Fimgi (purchased, 100). Crombie, Eev. J. ; British Lichens (purchased, 100). Groves, Hy. ; Italy (561). Groves, H. and J. ; roses (2). Hanbury, D., executors of; sundry (73). Henriques, J. A. ; Coimbra (11). Husnot, T.; France, Miisci (50). Jaeggi, J. ; Switzerland (66). Joad, G. C. ; Spain (6). Lange, Prof. ; Copenhagen Garden (10). Leefe, Rev. J. E. ; British Mosses and Lichens (120). Phillips, W. ; Fimgi (purchased, 50). Price, Miss Louisa ; Italy (Botrychium (1). Eabenhorst, Dr. L. ; Algce (purchased, 40). Rabenhorst and Gottsche ; Hepaticce (purchased, 80). Ralfs, J. ; Scilly [Ophioglossum, 1). Reichenbach, Prof. ; Orchids, &c. (11). Thuemen, Baron von; Mycotheca (purchased, 300). Wittrock and Nordstedt ; Algcs (100). Asia. — Aitchison, Dr. : N. W. India and Kashmir (163). Bed- dome, Col. ; Musci, &c. (71). Bisset, J. P.; Japan (403). Clarke, C. B. ; India (25,000). Dalzell, N. A. ; India (2). Elwes, H. J. ; Sikkim Alpines, &c. (97). Floyer, E. A. ; Persian Gulf, &c. (15). Ford, Charles; Hong Kong (6). Franchet, A.; Japan (4). Gode- froy-Lebeuf, A. ; Cambodia (Leguminosa, 93). Hance, Dr. ; Cam- bodia [Centrolepis, &c., 3). Henderson, Col. ; Himalaya (Filices, 8). King, Dr. G. ; India (Amoinum, 1). Lockwood, G. ; India (53). Pinwill, W. S. C. ; Malaya {Filices, &c.); India {Miisci) ] Scind {Gramineoi), 396. Post, George E. ; Syria (227). Robinson, W. Wellesley ; Malaya, &c. {Filices, 10). Ross, John ; North China (579j. St. Petersburg, Imperial Botanical Garden: — Ussuri (246), Japan (647), Siberia (575), Turkestan (145), Daghestan (206), Levant (86). Wiggins, Captain; Siberia (^27). 2 K 250 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Africa. — Barkly, SirH. ; Stapeliae, Pelargonia, &c. (50). Bull, Wm.; Liberia (14). Bolus, Harry; Cape {EricacecB, 44). Braun, Professor Alex. ; Abyssinia {Subularia, 1). Cosson, Dr. ; Algeria and Marocco (1104). Decaisne, Prof. ; Olinia (1). Freeman. A. ; Upper Nile (99). GiljDin, Miss Helen; Madagascar {Filices, enu- merated and described by Mr. Baker in the Journ. Linn. Soc, vol. xvi., ppp. 197-206), (72). Humboldt-Stiftung, Berlin, per Dr. G. Scliweinfurth ; Tropical Africa (1705). Hurst, Captain, H. A. ; Egypt (30). Johnson, J. Y. ; Madeira (4). Home, J. ; Johanna (89). Kirk, Dr. J.; Tropical Africa (2). Leefe, Rev. J. E.; Nubia and Abyssinia (215). Lisbon, Polytechnic School; Welwitsch's Angolan plants, first instalment (185). McOwan, P. ; (Rev. J. Buchanan's Glumales), South Africa (142). Monteiro, J. (pur- chased), Delagoa Bay, &c. ; Ancijlanthiis Monteiroi is figured in ' Icones Plantarum,' t. 1208 (60). Mus. d'Histoire Nat., Paris; Martinique (623). Royal Soc. (Dr. I. B. Balfour) ; Rodrigues Miisci (91). Schweinfurth, Dr. ; Egypt and Arabia (purchased, 182) ; C. Pfund (Kordofan and Darfur) (purchased, 258). Veitch, Messrs. ; West Tropical Africa (74). Wollaston, T. V. ; St. Helena (9). America. — North America and West Indies. — -Admiralty (Arctic Expedition); Crypts, and Phanerogamia, Lower Cryptogams (125). Dawson, George M. ; B. N. Am. Bdy. Comm. (709). Eaton, Prof. Filices (2). Elwes, H. J. ; Utah and California (15). Farlow, Prof. W. G. ; N.American Alga; (50). Finlay, Dr. K. ; West Indian Graminem (124). Gray, Dr. Asa ; North America (148). Hooker, Sir J. D. ; North America (1000). Jenman, G. S. ; Jamaica (chiefly Filices, 216). Lefroy, Sir J. H. ; Bermuda (12). Moseley, H. N. ; Oregon (159). Murray, Andrew; N. American Comferce (5). Robinson, H.E. Gov.; Bahamas (83). United States, Department of Agriculture (per F. Watts) ; Coniferm (37). South America. — Arechavaleta, Jose ; Monte Video ComjoositcB (191). Baiiee, H. E. ; F. P. ; Honduras (25). Ca^Danema, Dr. ; Brazil [PhyUostylon, 1). Glaziou, A.; Brazil (534). Gogorza, A. de; Columbia (1). Grise- bach. Prof. ; Argentine (535). Mitchell, E. 0. ; Honduras (2). Prestoe, H. ; Trmidad (5). Portello, Dr. Francisco ; Brazilian Ferns, Mosses, Lichens, &c. (96). St. Petersburg, Imp. Bet. Garden ; Brazilian plants (170). Australasia. — Bennett, Executors of J. J. (Herb. Brown) ; Australia (in continuation, 614); Lichens (35). Berggren, Dr. S.; New Zealand AJga'. (176). Buchanan, J. ; New Zealand (2). Cheeseman, T. F. ; New Zealand (2). Enys, J. D. ; New Zealand Filices (9). Field, H. C. ; New Zealand Fz//c^s (4). Gordon, H.E. , Sir Arthur ; Fiji (2). Hector, Dr. ; New Zealand (1). Ku'k, T. ; New Zealand (204). Kurtz, F. ; Lord Auckland's Island (2). Moore, Chas. ; Lord Howe's Island (Ferns, 8). Mueller, Baron von ; various Australian plants (779). Powell, Rev. T. ; Samoa (80). St. John Maule, H. : Australia (1). NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 251 EXTRACTS FROM THE REPORT OF THE CURATOR OF THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB FOR 1876. (Concluded from p. 218), Carex aquatilis, Walil., b. Watsoni. Banks of the Thurso River, Caithness. July, 1875. Clyde-side at Kenmure, 5 miles above Glasgow, June, 1876. — G. Horn. This seems really to be the type of the species. — J. T. Boswell. C. ccanthocarpa, Degland. ; C.fulva, var. sterilis, *E. B.,' ed. 3, vol. X., p. 153 ; C. fidva, Koch et Auct. plur. (non Smith). Marsh at Piggar, Swanbister, Orphir, Orkney. August, 1875. I found one or two tufts of this growing in company with C. flava and C.fulva {Hornsuchianana, Hoppe.) I have no doubt it is a hybrid between these two plants. It grows in much denser tufts than the latter, and the herbage is of a paler and yellower green ; but its affinities and habit agree with fulva, Sm., not with flava, L. (See Mr. R. A. Pryor's remarks on this in ' Journal of Botany,' 1876, p. 366-370.) My experience has agreed with that of the late M. Boreau, for the plant has remained unchanged under cultivation for two years, but it has produced no mature fruit. The perigynium, either in the wild or in the cultivated Orkney plant, has not become inflated ; the differences which C. ccanthocarpa exhibits in different localities, — in some approaching more towards C. flava, and in others to C.fulva, — are indications of its hybrid origin, as well as its intermediate characters and habit, and, above all, its abortive fruit. The Orkney specimens are the only British ones of C. xanthocarpa that I have yet seen. — J. T. Boswell. Anthoxanthum Puelii, Lee. et Lam. On peaty ground, near the south-eastern extremity of Lindow Common, Hundred of Maccles- field, Cheshire, the rifle-range being about a quarter of a mile N.W. August 26, 1876. {Vide 'Journ. Bot.,' October, 1876, p. 809.) It grew freely on peaty ground, which, I am of opinion, from its appearance, originally formed part of the adjacent waste bog, but has been reclaimed at some distant date. It is crossed by a cart- track, apparently used for conveying turf from the moss. Most of the ground in question was covered with grass and weeds, but there were some patches of potatoes. Extending over a length of from twenty to thirty yards, the Anthoxanthum grew in fair quantity, with all the appearance of being native, among grass and common weeds (no introduced plants.) It is, however, possible it may have been introduced with grass-seed. On closer examination of the specimens, I find some differ slightly from the example gathered by Mr. Briggs, and furnished me through the Exchange Club, in having all the parts rather larger, and the spikes and whole plant more robust. The peculiar scent is also stronger. All these differences may, however, be owing to the richness of the peat -soil on which they grew. The seeds of this grass may probably have been introduced when this part of the old bog was reclaimed. — Robert Brown. Alopecurus fidvus, Sm. South-west margin of the mill-pool at 252 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. Vale Bridge Common, near Hayward's Heath, East Sussex. Sep- tember 2, 1876. There is no record for East Sussex in 'Topog. Bot.'— J. L. Warren. Sclerochloa procumbens, Beauv., var. Specimens of a perfectly upright form from clay fields, Kii-kdale, north of Liverpool. Sep- tember, 1874. The type is common in similar situations both sides of the Mersey ; but the plant sent is so distinct in its general appearance as to render it worthy of notice. Besides the different habit of growth, the whole plant is far less rigid in its character. — H. S. Fisher. A curious form. I have one like it from Scar- borough Pier, collected by Crawford. — J. T. Boswell. Bromus asper, Mm'r., var. Southwick, W. Sussex. August 18, 1876. Not true Benekenii [i.e., not the Kensington Garden plant), but off the serotinus type in the Benekenii direction. Interesting as being a small example of serotinus, and yet with several lowest-node panicle branches, it being usually only the full and luxuriant specimens of serotinus which develop extra branchlets. The pales seem rather more equal than in ordinary serotinus also, and rather more uniformly hairy. — J. L. Warren. I believe that the two forms, serotinus and Benekenii, are too much connected by intermediates to permit them to be ranked as more than varieties. — J. T. Boswell. Seiiecio vulgaris, var. hibernicus, mihi. I now think the Cork plant, to which I gave the above name, must be S. vernalis, Wald- stein and Kitabel. Until this spring I have never succeeded in getting it to survive the winter out of doors ; but now it is in flower in the open ground, and has a very different habit from the unbranched individuals grown m pots, on which my opinion of its being a radiate form of 8. vulgaris, L., was founded. It is, when well developed, a much-branched plant, with larger heads than S. vulgaris, and longer peduncles ; the heads droop less than in examples of 5'. vulgaris of similar size, and the achenes are more oblong-fusiform, and the ligulate florets of the ray become revolute in the evening. I do not find this noticed in descriptions of S. vernalis; but it appears to occur in the allied species — for example, in the Madeiran 8. incrassatus, Lowe (5. crassifoHus, /3. Loivei, B.C.), Lowe, ' El. Mad.' p. 446 ; also in 8. coronojiifolius , Desf., and 8. leucanthewifolius, Poir. (teste ' Boissier El. Or.,' vol. iii., p. 388.) The Cork plant agrees with Hungarian specimen of 8. vernalis, but not with one from Smyrna (Balansa, No. 241) ; but Boissier says of it (I.e.), " Species folioruum divisione, caulibus plus minus elongatis et in excelsioribus nanis valde polymorpha." If the Cork plant be 8. vernalis, it cannot well be indigenous, as the species is confined to S. E. Europe. — J. T. Boswell, May 17, 1878. Mentha cardiaca. Hasley Common, Warwickshu'e, October, 1876. — H. Bromwich. This is the first specimen of M. cardiaca which has come into my hands, except from a garden. — J. T. Boswell. Symphytum asperrimum, Bieb., and 8. u})lnndicum ? Cultivated in Balmuto garden, 1876. I have been induced to send a few specimens of two forms of Symphytum , both of which I had under the name of asperrimum, but which seemed to me distinct, in consequence of some remarks on 8. asperrimum , patens and officinale, NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 253 in the ' Journal of Botany,' 1876, by Mr. R. A. Pryor (p. 214), and Prof. Babington (p. 244). Neither has any claim to be considered a British plant. S. asj^errimum I have from the neighbourhood of Bath, sent to the Botanical Society of London, by Mr. French, about twenty-five years ago ; the other form I had sent from Bath by Mr. T. B. Flower and Mr. C. E. Broome, whilst I was writing the genus Symphytum in the third edition of ' English Botany,' — these were sent to me as S. asperrimum. I have also a specimen from the Rev. W. H. Purchas, labelled Symphytum orientale ? by the River Bradford, near Yurlgrave, Derbyshire, July, 1876. Very probably this is the plant mentioned by Mr. Pryor in the * Journal of Botany.' The i)lant which I consider true asj^errimwn has the veins of the leaves deeply impressed, so that they appear very rugose, the stem-leaves not decurrent, and with longer petioles, and even the floral leaves scarcely so, the flowers bright blue, with the aj)ical portion not much wider than the tube, and furrowed. The other plant has the leaves less rugose and distinctly decurrent, though much less so than in S. officinale, the flowers pale blue, more dingy than in asperrim,um, and the apical portion swollen until its diameter is much greater than that of the tube, and not at all furrowed. In flower it very closely resembles specimens of *S'. uplandicum, Nyman, which I have from Dr. Ahlberg, of Upsala ; but unfortunately I have not seen fruiting specimens of this plant, which Fries considers to be the true S. orientale of Lmnaeus, and of which he says : ** Medium inter S. officinale et S. asperrimum.'" The plant I have in cultivation differs from S. officinale in its greater size, ovate- cordate root-leaves shghtly decurrent on the petiole, much less decurrent stem-leaves, and larger flowers ; but, above all, by the calyx- segments in fruit becoming muricated as in S. asperrimum. The hairs on the branches are also stiffer than those of S. officinale, but much less so than in true S. asperrimum,. With S. orientale, DC. Prod., it has no affinity. — J. T. Boswell. Statice hahusiensis, Fries. Some time since, my attention was directed by the Rev. H. H. Higgms to the two forms of Statice growing on the Mersey shore at Bromborough, but I did not visit the locality until Mr. Robert Brown informed me that his attention had been drawn to the fact that specimens in the Edinbm-gh Herbarium, collected by the late Dr. Dickenson, proved to be the above species. On the 2nd of September, Mr. Brown and myself found that plant growing abundantly at the above locality inter- mixed with a few plants of typical Limonium. This is a welcome addition to our Cheshire Flora. — H. S. Fisher. As an Appendix to the Rei:)ort of Kew Gardens for 1877, lately published, — which contains much useful and interesting informa- tion on economic botany of an authentic character, — a list of the AroidefF cultivated in the Gardens is given. This has been pre- pared by Mr. E. N. Brown, of the Kew Herbarium, and contains nearly 250 species. 254 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. The ' Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society' (vol. ii., -p. 380) contains a list of plants observed near Cromer in the autumn of 1875, 1876, by Prof. C. C. Babington. Baron von Mueller has commenced the 11th volume of his ' Fragmenta Phyt. Australia.' A new genus of Sapindacea^ — Blepharocanja — from Endeavour River, is very remarkable in having its small sessile dioecious flowers inserted over the interior of a coriaceous laciniate involucre, somewhat recalling the inflo- rescence of Dorstenia or Pterisanthes. New Books. — S. Kurz, ' Forest Flora of British Burma.' 2 vols. Calcutta, 1877 (30.s.) — J. D. Hooker and others, 'Flora of British India.' Part 5. L. Reeve, London (lOs. M.) — W. M. Watts, *A School Flora.' London (2s. 6f/.) -- J. E. Taylor, * Flowers.' London, Hardwicke & Bogue (7s. M.) — J. D. Hooker, * Student's Flora of the British Islands.' 2nd edition. London, Macmillan (10s. M.) — E. M. Holmes, 'A Botanical Note-book.' W. Christy, London (3s.) — T. Meehan, ' The Native Flowers and Ferns of the United States,' illustrated by chromo-lithographs. Pai-ts 1 & 2. Boston (50 cts. each). — A. & C. Dodel-Port, ' Anatomisch-physiologische Atlas der Botanik.' Part 1. Six coloured diagrams. Schreiber, Esslingen (15 mA-.) — 0. Kuntze, 'Cinchona, Arten, hybriden & Cultur der Chininbaume.' Haessel, Leipzig. — G. C. Wittstein, ' The Organic Constituents of Plants and Vegetable Substances, and their Chemical Analysis.' Trans- lated, with numerous additions, by Baron Ferd. von Mueller. Melbourne, 1878. — H. Baillon, ' Nouvelles Observations sur les Olinia.' Paris, 1878. — ' Monographiae Plantarum : Prodi'omi nunc contmuatio nunc revisio. xiuct. Alph. & Cas. DeCandolle aliisque botanicis. Vol. I. Smilacecp., RestiacecB^ MeliacecB.' Masson, Paris, Jmiio, 1878 (30s.) — M. Willkomm & J. Lange, ' Prodromus Floras Hispanicae,' vol. iii., pt. 3. Schweizerbart, Leipzig (9 ink.) — Bohnensieg & BuRCK,. * Repertorium annum Lit. Bot. period. (1875).' Loosjes, Haarlem, 1878. — W. B.Hemsley, 'Diagnoses Plant, nov. vel minus cognit. Mexicanarum et centrali-Americanarum, Pars I. PolypetalcB.' London, July, 1878. Articles in Journals. — June, 1878. Grevillea. — M.C.Cooke, 'New British Fungi.' ~ Id., ' Ra- venel's N. American Fungi.' Joiirn. Linn. Soc. (Parts 96, 97, June 17th). — J. Ball, ' Spici- legium Florae Maroccanse ' (concluded), (tt. 27, 28). American NatU7'alist. — L. F. Ward, ' On the genealogy of plants.' Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. — K. Mikosch, ' Influence of light, heat and moisture on the opening and shutting of the anthers in Bidbo- codium vernum: — F. Hauck, ' Ahjcr of the Adriatic ' (continued. BOTANICAL NEWS. 265 tab. 2). — B. Stein, * Primula Kerneri, Goebel & St. {= P. sub- auricula x villosa).' — E. Hackel, 'Two critical Grasses from Greece.' — F. de Thuemen, * Symbolae ad flor. Mycologicam Austriacam' (continued). — W. Vatke, ' Plantae in itin. Africano a Hildebrandt collect. — Leguminosa.' — F. Antoine, 'Botany of the Vienna Exhibition ' (continued). Flora. — W. Nylander, ' Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam Europaeam.' — A. Minks, 'The Microgonidium ' (continued). — J. B. Keller, ' On Eoses ' (continued). Bot. Zeitung. — H. Solms-Laubach, ' On the structure of the flower and fruit of the PandanacecB ' (continued, tab. 10). — P. F. Reinsch, ' Botanical Notes from America.' — Oudemans, ' Note on Spharia Brassica, Kl.' — E. Junger, 'Notes from old botanical works.' — H. Nebelung, ' Spectroscopic researches on the colouring matters of some fresh -water AlgcB ' (tab. 11). Magyar Novenyt. Lapok. — ' Obituary notice of F. Schur.' — L. Simkovics, * Three Violets new to Hungary.' — (Supplt.) F. Porcier, ' Enumeratio plant, distr. quondam Naszodiensis.' JSotauual Netos. We learn from the Pieport of Kew Gardens, recently pubhshed, that the post of Assistant to the Dkector of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Ceylon, lately vacated by Mr. Hartog, has been filled by the appointment of Mr. Daniel Morris, B.A., of Trin. Coll., Dublin. Also that Mr. Everard im Thurm, B.A., of Exeter College, Oxford, has been appointed Curator of the British Guiana Museum, where a portion of the duties will consist in exploring the country. No less than seventy-six ladies competed for the prizes in Botany at Apothecaries' Hall. Of these five were placed in the first and fifteen in the second class. Barthelemy Charles Du Mortier, the venerable and eminent statesman and botanist of Belgium, died at his native town, Tournai, on July 9th, in his eighty-second year. As a poHtician he has for many years taken a very prominent part in public affairs, and was the acknowledged leader of the clerical party in the Chamber. As a botanist he ranks very high, and his writings show a powerful and original treatment of the portions of the science which he handled, as well as the possession of great critical sagacity in the matter of species. His earUest botanical treatise, the ' Commentationes Botanicae,' was published so long ago as 1822, and consists of descriptions of several new genera dedicated to Belgian botanists, few of which have been retained, a general arrangement of the vegetable kingdom on a new 256 BOTANICAL NEWS. " symmetrical" sj^stem, and a classification of the European Junyer- mannicB. It is but quite recently that, after an interval of over fifty years, M. Du Mortier has returned to this group and given us his valuable ' Hepaticae Europse.' In 1827 he visited England to consult the Linnean herbarium, and on his return to Belgium he published his ' Florula Belgica.' After the year 1837 politics absorbed nearly all his time till 1862, when on the foundation of the Belgian Botanical Society he became the first President, and recommenced to publish on Botany. The ' Bulletin ' of the Society contains numerous papers on the more critical genera and species of the Belgian flora, of which the most important are the ' Etude Agrostographique ' and the 'Bouquet du litoral Beige,' both pubhshed in 1868. The now flourishing Jardin Botanique de I'Etat at Brussels owes its establishment on a satisfactory scientific basis mainly to the efforts of M. du Mortier. His name is appro- priately commemorated in the genus of Hepaticce, Dumortiera, as well as by several species dedicated to him. The death of Giovanni Zanardini occurred at Venice, where he was Professor of Botany, on April 24th, at the age of seventy-four. He was a distinguished algologist, and studied for many years the species of the Adriatic, upon which he has published several valuable memoh's. Zanardini w^as also the author of a Catalogue of Phanerogamous plants of Venetia, and of other papers. The genus Zanardinia is now referred to Paclina. We have also to record the death of Elias Borszczow, from typhus, on May 12th. He was Professor of Botany and Director of the Garden et Kiew, and as an author is best known for his fine memoir on the Galbanum- and Assafcetida-yielding species of Ferula found in the Aralo-Caspian desert, which he visited in 1858. He also pubhshed an account of the Calligonem of the same region. Our obituary also contains the name of Phil. Joh. Ferdinand ScHUR, who died in his eightieth year on May 28th. He was a native of Konigsberg (Prussia), but resided for very many years at Hermanstadt in Transyllvania. His numerous papers, from 1850 onwards, refer mainly to the botany of that province, and in 1866 he published an elaborate 'Enumeratio Plantarum Transsilvaniae,' where he carries out views of the limits of species, so as to make up the large total of 4222 species of Phanerogams and Ferns for the district. A memoir, with portrait, will be iound in the 'Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr.' for January, 1876, and an obituary notice in the Hungarian Bot. Journal for last June. The first part of Curtis's collection of the plants of the Southern United States (250 species) is now issued. The Curator of Har- vard University Herbarium will receive applications for them at twenty dollars the set, and states that the specimens are well chosen, copious and perfect, all named, and with neat printed tickets. Ta;b.l98. ^ A-Pronchfit.iel. H.0l6eii,]iLk Mintem Bros imp. Sh.e arena Polii, A.FranJiet. ©rigmal ^xtitlt^. SUE UNE NOUVELLE ESPECE DE SHEAllERIA. Pak M. a. Franchet. (Tab. 198). Sheareeia Polii, n. sp. — Annua, erecta, semi- vel vix pedalis, glabra ; ramiili graciles, patentes vel arcuato erecti ; folia alterna, sessilia, inferne longe attenuata, oblonga vel obovato-spatliulata, obtusa vel etiam apice subemarginata, nervo excurrente mucronu- lata ; capitula ad apicem ramulorum solitaria, basi nuda vel ssepins folio supremo contiguo bracteata, subsexflora ; foliola involiicri 5-6, subbiseriata, interioribus vix longioribus, ovato-lanceolata, margine pallidiori membranaceo subtiliter erosnla et papillis ciliata, dorso distincte nervata ; flores radii 3, feminei, fertiles, ligulati, ligula (pallide purpm-ascenti ?) obovata, aioice vix distincte emar- ginata ; flores disci bisexuales, circiter 2-3, steriles, lutei, tubulosi, profunde 5-lobati, lobis lanceolatis acutis, margine tenuiter papil- losis, caeterum glabri, floribus radii dnplo breviores ; stylus in fl. disc, et rad. bifidus, raniis lanceolato-cylindricis, subacutis ; acli^- nium (juvenile) oblongum, inferne attenuatum, apice rotundatum, compressum, obscure 3-4-gonum, angulis membranaceis serie ]3apillarum ciliatis. A Shear eria nana, S. Moore, prsecipue differt : foliis omnibus evolutis oblongo-spathulatis nee linearibus, squam^formibus ; achaBniis oblongis, nee e basi latiore ajDice angustatis ; glabritie. Nous n'avons pas vu les aclianes murs de cette espece. Dans leur jeune age ils sont tres comprimes et leurs angles sont surtout indiques i^ar une ligne de papilles d'un jaune d'or ; dans toutes les fleurs le style est bifide, tandis que M. S. Moore dit que cliez le S. nana le style des fleurs du disque est entier. Autant que nous en pouvons juger sur le sec les ligules du S. Polii sont rosees ou d'un pourpre pale ; les capitules cam- panules ne depassent pas 4 mill, et les feuilles 15 a 20 mill, de longueur. Cette espece a ete recoltee a Me-clii, partie N. 0. du Tclie- Kiang, Chine, le 27 Sept., 1876, par M. Henri de Poli. Description of Tab. 198. — Sheareria Polii, Franch. (nat. size). — Fig. 1. Flower of the disk. Fig. 2. Style of disk-flower. Fig. 3. Flower of the ray. Fig. 4. Style of ray-flower. Fig. 5. Very young achene. Fig. C. Scale of the involucre. (Figs. 1 to 6 much enlarged). N. s. VOL. 7. [September, 1878.] 2 l 258 ON THE PLACE OF CHAEACE^ IN THE NATURAL SYSTEM. ON THE PLACE OF CHARACE.E IN THE NATUEAL SYSTEM. By Prof. T. Caruel. Mr. Bennett has discussed this subject in an interesting paper which appeared m the ' Journal of Botany' for July (p. 202), con- densing in a few jDages most of what has been written on the structure and affinities of Cliaracece. He has incidentally mentioned the place I have given them, as forming a separate division (or primary groujD) beetween Phanerogams and Prothallogams ; but as he has not recorded my reasons for so doing, perhaps some explanation on vaj part will not come amiss. In my recent book on Morphology ''' I have tried to bring mto full light the fact that all vegetable organisms (except the veiy lowest) are reiu-eseuted in every species by three different forms, in alternating generations, viz., a neutral form, producing, either directly or indirectly, two sexual forms, which by their action on each other reproduce the neutral form. Now these present different and even opposite characters, according to the various series of plants ; and of such I have availed myself to define better those large primary divisions of the vegetable kingdom that, under dif- ferent names, are now admitted by all botanists. In Bryogams (Mosses), and those Gymnogams that are trimorphous (such as Oedogoniaceoi), the female form is indefinite in its evolution, and organized so as to produce in succession a long series of arche- gonia and thence embryos (or of oogonia), and of antheridia, which last produce the phytozoa or male form ; while the neutral form is, on the contrary, definite in its evolution, in Mosses begin- ning as an embryo, and terminating shortly by the formation of the urn at one end. In the remainder of the vegetable world the process is reversed : it is the neutral form that is indefinite, while the female forms (gemmule in Phanerogams, prothallus in Ferns and their allies) are definite, only once producing the embryo of the neutral form. And such is the case with Cliaracea:, which can therefore by no means be brought together either with Mosses or with Ah I a. Much stress has been laid on the supposed similarity between Characea and Mosses, from the cu'cumstance that these last, when they are cormophytes, begin by a filamentous thallus, on which subsequently buds are formed ; and CJiaraccic have been deemed to act likewise. But notwithstanding the high authority of those who support this view of the case, I own I cannot side with them. A careful examination of the process of germination in Characecr, as exposed by Pringsheim and De Bary, shows indeed the lateral formation of buds on a previous sim^Dle shoot ; but as this con- temporaneously gives out leaves on the other side, it can be considered in no other light than as a stem, and nowise as * Shortly noticed at p. 170. — [Eu.] ON THE PLACE OF CHARACE.E IN THE NATURAL SYSTEM. 259 homologous with the thaUns (protonema) of Mosses, however it may resemble it in general ai^pearance. On comparing Characem with Prothallogams, we find a resem- blance in the structure of the phytozoa, and in the main points of the process of germination, in both the neutral plant originating crosswise and directly from the top of the embryo or of the oospore. But there is a wide difi'erence in the total absence of anything like the sexual prothallus so xDeculiar to the Prothallogams, as also in the complex organisation of the antherocyst compared to the simx^ler antheridium, and of the oogemma compared to the arche- gonium, and in the very different origin of both, which in Characem proceed directly from the neutral form and not from spores pro- duced by it ; on the o'ther hand, comparing them with Phanero- gams, we find a marked resemblance of structure, coupled with the same origin, between the oogemma of the one and the gemmule (misnamed ovule) of the other ; and I perfectly agree with Cela- kovsky in considering them homologous organisms. There is, moreover, a similarity of origin in the male forms of both the groups, equally proceeding from bodies which are modifications of leaves. But alongside with these analogies we have such dif- ferences in the structure of the male apparatus, and in the process of formation of the neutral plant, which in Phanerogams begins as an embryo placed lengthwise at the end of a proembryo, that there is no need to insist on the necessity of separating Characea from Phanerogams as well as from Prothallogams. Then what remains to be done with them, except to recognize simply that they have a right to stand by themselves as a distinct group, equal in rank to the four others generally admitted ? Sachs was the first to think so, and I am sorry to see he has altered his opinion, on grounds quite insufficient, as Mr. Bennett has well shown. As a distinct grou^^, the position of my Schistogams can be nowhere but between Phanerogams and Prothallogams, in a morpliological system of classification, such as ours all essentially are. One last word on a more general subject. As none of the pri- mary groups that I have admitted m my classification — Phanero- gams, Schistogams, Prothallogams, Bryogams, Gymnogams — are of my own making, it may be deemed superfluous, or even worse, for me to have given them new names (except the first one). I have been led to do so by the following considerations : — Fkstly, in order to put forth more strongly the idea, which now-a-days will be disputed by very few, that the old class Cryptogamia of Linneus must be split up into a number of groups, each fully equivalent to the Phanerogams. Secondly, to do away, for these groups, with such names as Vascular Cryptogams and Cellular Cryptogams, which imply that they are subdivisions of some superior group. I really believe it would be a gain for science to let fall altogether the term Cryptogams, which in the present state of botany has nothins: left it but a negative signification. 260 BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. BOTANICAL NOMENCLATUEE. By William Mathews, M.A. It has recently been my misfortune to collate several catalogues of plants for the purpose of comparing the vegetation of the countries to which they refer. One cannot engage in such an undertaking without being painfully impressetl by the confusion which exists in botanical nomenclature and in the practice of citing authorities, and of the necessity for a reform in both parti- culars, I venture therefore to say a few words upon a question which has lately been discussed in the pages of this Journal. The authority wdiich is attached to the name of an organic form may be regarded from one of two points of view — 1st, as referring to the collocation of the two members of the double name, i. e., of the left hand or generic, and of the right hand or specific member ; 2ndly, as referring to the right hand or specific member only. The former practice has hitherto prevailed among botanists, the latter among zoologists. There is no a priori reason in the nature of things wh}^ the one convention is preferable to the other. It is shnpl}" a matter of convenience, and the question is, on which side does the balance of convenience lie ? It is evident that there ought not to be two rules, the one for the vegetable, the other for the animal kingdom. It follows from the second or zoological rule that the oldest specific name has the right of priority, and that it carries with it the initials of the author, however various the genera in which the organism may have been placed by the vagaries of subsequent describers. An exception may of course arise if the oldest specific name has a manifest impropriety in a new connection. If the botanists who speak of this as "a new rule" will refer to a catalogue of shells, they will find the old Linn^an genus Venus now subdivided into many genera, one of which is djjirina of Lamarck ; but they will see the old Venus islandica of Linnaeus described as Cyprina islandica, Linn., not Cyprina islandica, Lam. (Forbes & Hanley, ' British MoUusca,' vol. i. p. 441). Or take a catalogue of insects (I have before me both editions of Staudinger's ' Lepidoptera of Em-ope'), and tmii to the old Linnasan genus Papilio. The Peacock Butterfly, now placed in the genus Vanessa of Fabricius, stands as Vanessa lo, Linn., not Vanessa lo, Fab. ; and so on to the end of the chapter. A difliculty arises when an author makes an existing specific name the name of a new genus. Thus Fabricius changes the name of the Goat Moth, Ijouiby.r Cossu.s, Linn., into Cossns liyniperda. In the first edition of his ' Catalogue' (1861) Staudinger gives Cossns liyniperda, Fab., but in the second (1871) he boldly reduplicates the earliest specific name, and writes Cossns Cossns, Linn. The zoological rule has great advantages. It saves us from a host of useless authorities, and w^orsc than useless synonyms ; it ensures that the name of the first describer shall generally, if not BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE. 261 invariably, be associated with that of the organism ; and it removes from vain and shallow authors the temptation to hand their names down to posterity " as a reward for confusing the nomenclatm-e. Indeed, so well has the rule worked in Entomology that insects may be, and frequently are, referred to, in conversation, by their specific names only. Let us now examine the working of the other rule in the vegetable kingdom. The first point to be noticed is that botanists often disagree as to what authority to attach to any given combination. The genus Erodium was founded by I'Heritier on a section of the Linnsean genus Geranium. If we search for the authority for Erodium. woschatum, formerly Geranium moschatum, Linn., we find the fol- lowing remarkable differences of opinion : — Erodium moschatum, L'Herit. in Ait. Hort.Kew. (Koch; Nyman, Sylloge.) Erodium moschatum, Ait. (Reichenbach). Erodium moschatum, L'Herit. (Syme, English Bot. ; Grenier & Godron, and most French Floras). Erodium moschatum, Willd. (Bertoloni, Flor. Ital. ; Munby, Cat. Plant. Alg.) Erodium moschatum, Smith. (Bab. Man., ed. 7.) Here we have at least three different designations of the same plant, in a case where a zoologist would have written Erodium, moschatum, Linn., as a matter of course, and given himself no further trouble.''' It is scarcely necessary to point out how mis- leading this is. '' Erodium moschatum, IjUqyU.,'' " Erodium mos- chatum,WiUd.,'' and " Erodium moschatum, Smith," ought, according to all analogy, to stand for three different plants, and not for three different views of the authority for one. A still more serious mischief than the confusion of authorities is the liberty which botanists have accorded to themselves, in moving a well-known plant into a new genus, of changing its specific name, and the frightful multiplication of synonyms of which this has been the cause. According to some of the corre- spondents of this Journal we ought to be grateful, rather than otherwise, for this exercise of the fancy. The common Male Fern, Polypodium Eilix-nias of Linnaeus, has been placed in at least eight different genera, and received two s^Decific names besides the first. It is a matter of accident rather than design that this x^bi^nt has not as many specific names as generic, with sixty-four combinations of the two, and a different authority for each combination. The nomenclature of Orchids is nearly as bad as that of Ferns. The common Frog Orchis stands in seven genera, but has happily only one specific name. With Neotinea intacta we are not so fortunate : this plant is an admirable instance of the logical * On the correct authority for Erodium moschatum see a note at p. 282. — [Ed. Journ. Bot.] 262 A NEW SPECIES OF FRITILLARY. development of the botanical rule ; it stands in five genera, has five specific names, and eight difl'erent collocations of the two. According to the zoological rule, in the above and all similar cases, the earliest specific name would be adopted, and be followed by the initials of its author, whatever genus may be prefixed to it. The useless specific names and authorities would disappear from the nomenclature, but would remain in the synonymy for reference in case of need. The instances m which the same i^lant appears in different catalogues, under disguises affording no clue to its identity, may be counted by scores. They are a great stumbling-block to students, and a positive scandal to science. Why, for example, should Mesj)ilus AwelancMer of Linn^us appear in one place as Pijrus Ame- lanchier, Willd., and in another as Aronia rotundifolia, Pers., when it might so easily be written Aronia Amelanchier, Linn. ? In such a case as Lotus Tetragonolobus, Linn., where the specific name has been raised to generic rank, I imagine we should still write Tetrar/onolobus jnuyureus, Moench., and that scientific opinion is at present scarcely ripe for such a combination as 2'etragonolobus Tetrafjonolobus, Linn., as Staudinger would write it. I regard it as inevitable that there will ultimately be one system of nomenclature for all organised nature, and that the zoological rule will supersede the botanical. A NEW SPECIES OF FRITILLABIA. By H. G. Eeichenbach, Jil. When naming, last year, the Fritillaries for our Botanic Garden, I came upon Bolander's no. 4654, '' Fritillaria lanceolata, var." From this my specimen of F. lanceolata, Pm^sh, differed obviously in its three usually whorled leaves larger and narrower at the base, its larger flowers and its longer sepals, which were not suddenly contracted and had besides apparently very different nervation. As neither the last monograph of my excellent friend Mr. J. G. Baker nor the numerous publications of Prof. Asa Gray and Mr. Sereno Watson contained such a plant, I w^as inclined to consider it new ; but unwilling to rely upon my own research alone, I applied to the first-named monographer for assistance. His opinion was the same as my own, but he placed the species near F. bi flora, Lindl., a Liliorldza ; whilst I had thought it a Gonio- carija. The kindly added sketches of typical specimens proved the correctness of Mr. Baker's view ; and I am thankful to him for permission to publish the species under our joint authority, dedi- cated to the excellent Dr. Asa Gray. The plant is readily distinguished fi-om F. bijiora, Lindl., by the shorter and less acuminate sepals, much narrower bracts, and narrower and more acuminate leaves. Generally speaking, it is not unlike the taller specimens of F. fjrceca, Boiss. & Si)run. ON AN ISLE OF WIGHT GENTIAN. 263 May the plant long enjoy its existence before it falls a victim to certain raiDacious tourists, who, ignoring the ^Dresent and future existence of other men as much entitled to the enjoyment of nature as themselves, delight in bringing home bulbs by the thousand. Thus has F. tristis, Heidi*. & Sart., been destroyed at Athens by the Herr Hofgartner Schmidt. Thus, as I was told at Limone in Piedmont, has F. j\I()(/f/rid(jii, in the Valle Amellina, been totally eradicated by a well-known English bulb -amateur and tourist : his guide, Bartolomeo Viola, beheving, no doubt, in generatio aquivoca, wondered at there being no more flowers, as the gentleman had only twice taken every bulb ! Apres nous le deluge. I add a short descriptive diagnosis : — '^^ Fritillaeia Grayana, Rchb.f., d Baker. — Ultra spithamsea, gra- cilis, foliis in caule quinis sen quaternis infimis cuneato- ligulatis, breve acutis, inflorescentia uniflora seu biflora, bracteis hnearibus, acutis, elongatis, floribus longe pedicel- latis pedunculatisque, nutantibus (0-02 m. longis), sepalis externis ligulatis acutis, internis bene latioribus, omnibus apicibus scabris, foveis juleoformibus (? si recte video) fila- mentis antheras quater superantibus, stylo ad medium fere trifido. Hah. California, 1866 ; Bohmder, n. 4654 ! ON AN ISLE OF WIGHT GENTIAN. By Fred. Stratton, F.L. S. On the 23rd of May last I received from Dr. John Grieve, of Glasgow, who was then staying at Ventnor, some specimens of a Gentian which he had gathered on the down belimd Steephill Castle, and which he referred to the variety /3. of Gentiana Amarella, L., noticed by Dr. Bromfield in the ' Flora Vectensis.' A few days afterwards I went to Steephill, and was surprised at the great abundance of the plant. It grew mostly in large patches from five to ten feet across, and was, fi-om its profusion and the dark brow^nish purple leaves and calyces, a conspicuous feature in the herbage of the chalk down. There are several characters in which this Gentian differs from both its nearest allies, G. AmareUa and G. camj^estris. First, the time of flowering, which in those constitutes them autumnal- flowering plants, in this places it amongst spring flowers. A considerable proportion of the plants had on the 27th of May well- advanced capsules (on the 17th of August only the withered stems and capsules full of ripe seed were to be found; a rather thick- set pyramidal form of ordinary G. AmareUa, in full bloom, having taken the place of its early-flowering neighbour, and in almost equal abundance). This character, when it occurs in isolated plants and is unaccompanied by any other divergence from their 264 ON AN ISLE OF WIGHT GENTIAN. congeners, is not of any very great value ; but it is of great importance when it is permanent and associated with marked differences from nearly-alhed species, as, for instance, in another plant of the south side of the Isle of Wight, Arum italicum. The early appearance of the leaves of this, at the end of September, whilst the spadix with its red fruit is still an ornament of the woods, goes far to corroborate the testimony as to its status amongst species afforded by the other characters in which it differs from A. maculatiuiK The early- flowering habit of this Gentian is accompanied by the following characters, which render it difficult 'to assign it to either of its likest relations : — Both the corolla and calyx are almost always 4-cleft ; in the very few instances of a 5-cleft corolla the catyx is usually, but not invariably, 5-cleft also. The calyx- segments are very unequal, variable, and generally much larger than in G. AmareUa, and more divergent than in either G. AmareUa or G. campestris ; m this respect resembling G. germanica, but it lacks the large corolla and larger stouter habit characteristic of that plant. Two of the segments are often so much larger than the others as to simulate the corresponding character in G. cam- pestris, but even in then- broadest state they do not sirring from below the two narrower segments, nor do they clasp and conceal the latter, as in G. campestris. The whole plant is more slender, more branched, and shorter than either G. A)narella or G. cam- pestris : few specimens are more than three inches in height, and all are branched mostly at or near the base. The seeds are roundish oval, dark brown, translucent, slightly polished and rugose, with one or two circular pits, probably caused by contact with the adjoining seeds. Gentiana campestris is one of our very rarest Isle of Wight plants, and has not been seen at all for some years, the last record of its occurrence being that by Mr. E. Tucker in this Jom-nal for 1870 (viii. p. 160) ; so that the probability of this plant being a hybrid between that species and (/. AmareUa is very slight. Mr. Tucker seems also to have met with a ]3lant which he refers to G. AmareUa, var. ft., and which he states occurred jDlentifullj^ on Afton Down ; but he does not give the time of its flowering, and his visits were paid, except in the year 1864, in the autumn. In the same volume of the Journal, Mr. T. R. Archer Briggs records (p. 223) finding a few specimens of an early-flowering state of G. campestris in the neighbourhood of Plymouth : it may, however, be noted that there seems to be no record of any large quantity of this latter species found flowering in the spring. Dr. Trimen informs me that he collected a Gentian in flower on June 2nd, 1866, on White Horse Hill, Berks, which presents a very close resemblance to my Isle of Wight plant, but differs from it in some ^particulars. He at the time named his specimens G. campestris, and the x^lant appears under this name in Mr. Britten's Additions to the Berkshire flora in this Journal for 1873 ['p. 139). I may add that Crepin, in his * Flore de Belgique ' (ed. 2, p. 140), speaks of G. (jermanica as varying with a 4-cleft corolla and calyx, NOTE ON THE PRECEDING COMMUNICATION. 265 and also having occasionally two of the calyx- segments much larger than the others. I have di'ied a good number of specimens for distribution through the Botanical Exchange Club. NOTE ON THE PEECEDINO COMMUNICATION. By Henry Trimen, M.B., F.L.S. With reference to the plant above referred to by Mr. Stratton, which I collected in the early summer of 1866, on White Horse Hill, Berkshire, as Gentiana canipestris ; though a subsequent examination has clearly shown that it is not that species, it is less easy to refer it distinctly to G. Amarella. Under this very variable species there is little difficulty, to my mind, in placing Mr. Stratton 's certainly striking form from the Isle of Wight. On comparing his si)ecimens w^ith other spring-flowering ones fi'om Croydon (A. Bennett) and Tring (E. Forster), both of which have also 4-merous flowers, the chief points of difference in the Isle of Wight plant are seen to be the much longer pedicels, more striking inequality of the calyx- segments, and larger and more branched, habit ; its occiu-rence in such abundance is also worthy of remark. Eay recorded in 1696 (Syn. Stu-p. Brit., ed. 2, p. 156), under the name of G. fugax verna sen pnecox, what was probably a similar eaiiy-flow^ering variety of G. Amarella ; it was gathered near Kendal. I may add a few remarks as to the nomenclature of these forms or varieties. Mr. Stratton had suggested attaching the name of Dr. Bromfield to his plant, — a most appropriate course, were it not that there appear to be already several existing names. There can be little doubt that it is G. uliginosa, Willd., which is very characteristically figured in Eeichenbach's Plant. Crit., t. 58. Schur (Enum. Plant. Transylv., p. 461 ) places this under G. Amarella as var. ft. ulif/inosa, and quotes yet another name as a synonym, G. gracilis, Nees. To the same form I refer specimens from Naples (Huet de Pavilion, n. 392) labelled G. Colwmm, Ten. Dillenius had long ago (Syn. Stirp. Brit., ed. 3, p. 275) rightly identified Columna's figure (Ecphrasis, p. 221) of the Naples plant with Eay's plant above noted ; but some subsequent writers have con- founded it with G. campestris, which it clearly does not represent. Bertoloni does not consider (Fl. Ital., iii. 97) Tenore's species worth distinction even as a variety of G. Amarella, but then he treats G. germanica in a similar manner. To return to my Berkshire sj)ecimens. These differ from all tlie above in the wider form of the corolla- tube with blunt seg- ments, and in having oblong-spathulate obtuse leaves. All the flowers are 4-merous, and the pairs of calyx- segments very unequal. The only other specimens I have seen which can be considered as probably the same are fi-om Tyrol (Huter), and are labelled '^ G. gerinanica, var. ft. pygmcea'' ; and on the whole I am more 2 M 2GG rONSPKCTT'S POLYGAT.AEUM EUROPiTlARUM. inclined to place the Berks plant to G. (fermanica than to G. Ama- rella. Early-flowering states of the former have been already recorded. It is remarkable that the spring-flowering forms of both species should vary in precisely the same manner, with 4-merons flowers and two of the calyx- segments much increased in size. CONSPECTUS POLYGALARUM EUROP^ARUM. By Alfred W. Bennett, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S. (Concluded from p. •-24fi). Var. 5. anr/H.stifolm : annua (?) ; ditfert a forma typica habitu graciliore, alis obovatis, capsula multo angustioribus. P. anifustifolia, Lge., Pug., 317 ; Willk. et Lge., Fl. Hisp., iii., 557 (non H. B. K.) In Hispania boreali. Yar. G. pia, &c., in support of the statement. In the morphology of Halupjiila, which I have recently been studying, there are several pomts of great interest, but I shall only here refer to two. This genus includes a few marine plants, growing in widely spreading patches on sandy flats in the troi)ics, at the limits of ebb-tide. On looking at such a form sls H. oralis — the type of * Klotzsch, ' Die Aristolochiacece d. Berliner lifcrbariuins,' t. ii., f, 11. Duchartre, • Ann. sc. nat.,' 4e, ser., ii., t. 5, f. 0. + Klotzscli, op. cit., t. ii., f. Vi. X A paper, with illustralious, on the genus Halophila, will appear in the forthcoming part of the Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh. ON SOME POINTS IN THE MOKPHOLOGV OF HALOPHILA. 291 the genus — we observe a procumbent, freely branched, jomted stem : from almost every joint arises a branch, jointed and pro- cumbent, like the axis fi'om which it springs, and it in tarn bears similar branches, w^iich repeat the i3rocess. At the joints there is visible a pair of small sheathing scale-leaves, one on the under, and the other on the ux3per side of the procumbent stem ; and in addition there is a i^air of foliage-leaves on the uj)per side of the stem, with their bases somewdiat embraced by the sheathing upper pair of scale-leaves. The arrangement is such that at first sight one might suppose we had stipulate leaves ^jroduced in pairs at successive joints on one x3rocumbent branching axis. But the arrangement is more complicated and, so far as I know, unique in the vegetable kingdom ; and it is to this — a x^oint briefly noticed by Irmisch" many years ago — I wish, in the first l^lace, to direct attention. Taking any one procumbent axis as the (relative) j)rimary axis, we find it consists of alternating elongated and shortened inter- nodes. Each internode bears a small sheathing scale-leaf, and as every alternate internode is shortened these scale-leaves are approximated so as to appear in pairs. In each pair the leaves are always jDlaced opposite each other ; the older, that of the inferior internode, bemg always on the under side of the stem. The successive pairs are not superposed, as has been hitherto believed, but are set on so that their median planes form an acute angle with one another and a less acute angle with the vertically bisecting plane of the primary axis. The (relative) primary axis, no matter how greatly it elongates, only bears those scale-leaves. In the axil of the uppermost (younger) of each pair of scale-leaves on the (relative) primary axis there arises an extra-axillary leaf-bud, always on the side of the median plane of the subtending leaf, farther from the vertically bisecting plane of the primary axis. The secondary axis so developing begins with two shortened internodes, each of which bears a foliage-leaf. These foliage- leaves are always opposite one another, and are necessarily closely approximated on the axis. The third internode of the secondary axis is elongated, and bears a scale-leaf; and the fourth internode is shortened, and also bears a scale-leaf, these being placed opposite one another. Thus at the joint formed by' the third and fourth nodes a pak of opposite scale-leaves occurs. Now it is curious to note that these scale-leaves are in series with the scale-leaves on the primary axis ; and at every succeeding joint on the secondary axis a like pair of scale-leaves may be produced, and successive pairs will be set on at an acute angle with the pre- cedmg. We have, in fact, a repetition of what we observed on the primary axis. The upper scale-leaf of each pair on the secondary axis gives rise to an extra-axillary tertiary axis, the first pair of leaves on which are foliage-leaves, and all succeeding pahs are scale-leaves, and so on; Now whilst the scale-leaves on aU the axes are in series, the * Bot. Zeit., xvii. (1859), .'{55 adnot. 292 FLORA OF THE EXTREME SOUTH OF DEVON. foliage-leaves are not in series with the scale-leaves, but successive pairs of foliage-leaves primarily decussate ; tliough subsequently, owing to changes in the x^rogress of develoxnnent, they are set on at a wide acute angle. The peculiarity then in the arrangement of the leaves is this — the foliage-leaves are always produced as the first pair of leaves on lateral shoots arising in the axil of scale-leaves, and these shoots, as they elongate, thereafter produce only scale-leaves. I know of no instance of a similar arrangement. The second point to which I wish to refer is connected with the morphology of the part of the flower. The flowers are unisexual. The male flower consists of three stamens, connate by their filaments, and surrounded by a tripartite perianth, the segments of which alternate with the stamens. In the female flower three carpels are combined to form a one-celled, many-ovuled ovary, and the segments of the tripartite perianth alternate with the carpels. The position of parts renders it probable that we have here a case — similar to that of Salix amongst Dicotyledons — of the same phj'llomes forming carpels in one flower and stamens m the other. But whilst analogy supports this supposition the explanation is conceivable that wdiilst in the female the inner perianth of the typical monocotyledonous flower is present with the three carpels, in the male the outer x3erianth-whorl coupled with the inner staminal row, is reiDreseuted. SOME NOTES ON THE FLOKA OF THE EXTREME SOUTH OF DEVON. By T. R. Archer Briggs, F.L.S. I HAVE recently spent a few days in investigating the botany of the portion of S. Devon that lies between Bigbury Bay on the west, and the Start Point on the east, and forms the bold stretch of land projecting into the English Channel on each side of .the inlet running up to the town of Kingsbridge, and terminating on its Avestern and eastern sides in the respective headlands of Bolt Head and Prawlo Point. Comj^aratively little has been done by the botanist in this i^art of Devon, though its flora is of peculiar interest from the land being the most southerly in the county, and such of it as lies south of a line drawn from the village of Hope, a little north of Bolt Tail, to Hall Sands, near the Start Point, being on mica slate and gneiss. Eocks of similar formation do not occur elsewhere in the county, tliough they reappear in the adjoining one of Cornwall, to the south of the serpentine, at Lizard Point. My examination of the tract lias been of too incomplete and cursory a nature to allow me to attempt anything like a full account of tlie plants growing in it. What I aim at doing in this paper is to name, mil sometimes give particulars respecting, the rarer or FLOE A OF THE EXTREME SOUTH OF DEVON. 293 otherwise more than coramonly interesting among the species that I noticed during four days' search in it with my brother, from July 30th to August 2nd of the present year. Clematis Vitalba, Linn. About one mile from Kmgsbridge, by the Dartmouth Eoad ; Thurlestone Village ; between Buckland and Bantham. Ranunculus Lenormandi, F. Schultz. In a bog close to the coast on the hill- side, immediately east of Sewer Cove. Berberis vuhjaris, Linn. A single bush in a hedge by a lane near Lincombe away from houses. Papaver Bhceas, Linn., b. striijosum. Seen in the district. P. An/emone, Linn. In a potato patch at Thurlestone ; one plant among potatoes at Prawle. P. Jnjhndum, hinn. With P. Ar gem one at Thurlestone; in a corn-field at Bolt Head. Glaucium luteum, Scop. North Sands, near Salcombe. I have not found the Horned Poppy a common plant in S. Devon. Chelidonium majus, Linn. Seen only m one spot between the hamlets of Buckland and Bantham. In Devon and Cornwall it seems always derived fi-om former cultivation. Fumaria pallidijiora, Jord. Bank by South Sands, near Salcombe, and between that and the village. One of the. localities given for this plant by Dr. Boswell, in Eng. Bot., ed. 8, is Salcombe, on the authority of Prof. Babington. It is interesting to find it so persistent here. Ilfracombe is the only other place in the county where I have seen it ; and this also is mentioned as a station in Eng. Bot. It seems partial to the neighbom-liood of the sea. F. confusa, Jord. This, the common Capreolate Fumitory of the county, was noticed in the district. Sinapis alba, Linn. In a field of potatoes at West Alvington ; and in one other spot. Looking more like a " colonist," less of a ** casual," than about Plymouth. Arabis hirsuta, Brown. In one spot in the churchyard at Kingsbridge. Senebiera didyma,'PeYS. lungsbridge ; West Alvington ; Thurle- stone ; Buckland. A plant that generally abounds in our villages, esiDecially if situated near salt water. Viola hirta, Linn. Only noticed about a mile and a half from Kingsbridge, by the Dartmouth road. Drosera rotundifolia, Linn. In a bog on the hill-side, east of Sewer Cove. There are now few suitable spots for it in the highly cultivated and rich arable tract about Kingsbridge, forming part of the fertile South Hams of Devon. Poli/rjala depressa, Wender. Seen in one or two spots. Mcenchia erecta, Sm. Bolt Head. Saijina ciliata, Fries. Sewer. S. subulata, Wimm. Bolt Head; Prawle Point. It was interesting to see this species, that is common on Dartmoor, growing on the most southern headlands of the warm sea-coast. Spergularia nerflecta, Syme, E. B. Seen by the tidal water. S. marginata, Syme. By the inlet at Blanks Mill. 294 FLORA OF THE EXTREME SOUTH OF DEVON. S. rupestris, Lebel. Bolt Head, &c. The common species of the rocky coast iu Devon and Cornwall. Polycarpon tetraphyllum, Linn. In considerable quantity and for some yards below a w^all and on a rocky bank at Buckland, a hamlet situated at the end of a small tidal inlet from the Avon estuary, in the parish of Thurlestone. In one spot it occurs with Erodium maritimum and Malva rotundifulia. The four places in which I have seen this in Devon and Cornwall are all in villages or hamlets, yet there is no ground for supposing it an introduction. One reason for its choosing such spots may be that it will only flourish in such dry or rocky places as support a scanty or minute vegetation incapable of crowding it out. Malva moschata, Linn. Seen near Ford only. M. rotundlfolia, Linn. Prawle village ; Buckland. One of the species most prone to grow near houses. Geranium sam/uineum, Lnin. On the mica and gneiss formation very near Prawle Point. It is recorded by Keys from Bolt Head, but we did not see it there. G. striatum, Linn. Seemingly quite established (as it is in several spots around Plymouth) on a hedgebank a short distance from an old house at CoUapit, on the lower road from.Kingsbridge to Salcombe. G. rotundifoHiim, Linn. By the road to Loddiswell, immediately to the north of Kingsbridge ; not seen elsewhere. G. lucidum in the same locality. Erodium maritimum, Sm. Thurlestone and Bantham villages. This dehghts to grow on rocky cuttings about villages lying near the coast. Considering the proximity of the sea and the large influx of tidal water into the tract I was surprised to find this in so few spots ; the aUied E. cicutarium only at Thurlestone and Bantham ; and E. moschatum not at all. Medicago sativa, Linn. Quite established in considerable quantity on the edge of a piece of cultivated ground, near a mass of rock, a short distance from Prawle Point, associated with Geranium sanguineum, and other native plants. It must have grown here for a considerable time. M. denticulata, Willd. By the road-side close to North Sands, near Salcombe. Trifolium medium, Linn. Near Prawle, in the mica and gneiss tract. Apparently not common. T. fragiferum , Linn. Thurlestone, on the sands and in the turf between that and the village, in plenty. A considerable distance from any previously recorded station. Not found anywhere near Plymouth. Lotus tenuis, Kit. Near Bolt Head. Orohus tuherosus, Linn., b. tenuif alius. With the type, in a lane near Wolston. Prunus Cerasus, Linn. In many spots in hedges. Agrimonia odorata, Mill. Between West Alvington and Marl- borough ; also near Heddiswell Cross, a little west of the former village; between Frogmoor and Ford. In the 'British Flora,' FLORA OF THE EXTREME SOUTH OF DEVON. 295 ed. 7, published in 1855, there are five stations named for this, of which Start Point is one, so that it was long ago. recorded from the neighbourhood. It is common all aroimd Plymouth into Cornwall, and occurs over the country intervening between Plymouth and Kingsbridge. Kubus rhammfoUus, W. & N. Near Ford. R. ramosiis, Blox. In a hedge, near Ford, between Kingsbridge and Prawle Point. B. discolor, W. & N. One of the common Piubi. li. villicauUs, W. & N., b. derasus, Babington ; R. adscitus, Gr. Grenev. Between Frogmoor and Ford. This abounds about Plymouth ; and in walking from Modbury to Kingsbridge we found it one of the commonest Brambles. R. umbrosus, Arrh. Hedge between West Alvington and Marl- borough. Not typical, being one of the small-leaved forms. R. diversifulius, Lindl. Salcombe, &c. This seems common m the tract. R. corylifoUiis, Sm., a. sublustris, Lees. Near Prawle ; between Frogmoor and Ford, &c. The well cultivated tract of country about Kingsbridge does not afford a large number of Rubi. Rosa sjnuosissima, Linn. Bolt Head; Prawle Point. Very small at both places. R. tomentosa, Sm. Near Prawle ; between Ford and Chivel- stone ; between West Alvington and Marlborough. R. micrantha, Sm. Between Chivelstone and Prawle ; near Ford. R, canina, Auct. The vars. luteticma, diimalis, and urbica, were noted. R. stylosa, Desv., a. systyla, Baker; R. systyla, Bast. Deseglise. Between West Alvington and Marlborough, and in a hedge close to Marlborough village ; between Kingsbridge and Salcombe. R. leucochroa, Desv. Apparently common. Between Kings- bridge and Salcombe ; between Frogmoor and Prawle Point ; near South Pool. A well-marked Eose that keeps up its characters well. R. arvensis, Huds., b. bibracteata. Hedge between West Alvington and Hidde swell Cross. Pyrus Mains, Linn., a. acerba, and b. mitis. In hedges. Both at 550 feet, near Prawle. Epilobium lanceolatum, S. & M. In considerable quantity close to Kingsbridge, on the north, by the road to Loddiswell. It also occurs within a mile of the town by the road to Churchstow, but this station is beyond the northern border of the district under consideration. This is also the case with Aveton Gilford, between Modbury and Kingsbridge, where we found it in plenty. We did not see it anywhere on the mica and gneiss. (Enothera odorata, J acq^. This seems established on a garden wall near Salcombe. Ph'yngium maritimiun, Linn. Thurlestone Sands. Sison Amomum, Lmn. In plenty about Kingsbridge; Thurle- stone. Pastmaca sativa, Linn. By the road to Dartmouth, near 296 FLOEA OF THE EXTKEME SOUTH OF DEVON. Kingsbridge Cemetery ; here in tolerable quantity, but not seen anywhere else. Smyrnium Ulusatrum, Linn. In a few spots near houses-, as an escaj)e from ancient cultivation. I have never seen it but in this character. Viburnum Upulus, Linn. Between Kingsbridge and Charleton. Not noticed anywhere else, nor did we see the allied V. Lantana in the district, though we found it in hedges at Churchstow, about two miles to the north-west of Kingsbridge, on the road to Aveton Gifford. This latter is a peculiarly local plant in S. Devon. Rubia peregrina, Linn. Salcombe ; Sewer. Galium cruciatum, With. Apparently common. It has a local distribution in Devon, and I have never met with it in Cornwall. G. verum, Lmn., b. ochroleucum. Thurlestone Sands ; in one spot covering a square yard, and appearing in others. I noticed some immature fruit, though this plant is suspected to be a hybrid by many. G. triconie, With. One plant among potatoes in a field at Thurlestone. Valerianella Auricula, DC. In a barley-held at HeddisweU Cross, near West Alvington ; among potatoes at Prawle. Dipsacus sijlcestris, Linn. Between Bolt Head and South Sands ; Thurlestone ; Chivelstone. Carduus tenuijiorus, Curt. South Sands ; Thurlestone. Not so general as we might expect from the maritime influences prevailing. Arctium intermedium., Lange. Near Bolt Head. Serratula tinctoria, Linn. Noticed only between Kingsbridge and Salcombe. A general paucity of sylvestral species in the tract. Artemisia Absinthium, Linn. Thurlestone, sparingly near the church. In Devon and Cornwall, I believe, always derived fi'om ancient cultivation. Inula Conyza, DC. Common. I. crithmoides, Linn. On a mass of rock by Sewer Cove. But few Devonian stations are recorded for this, and I have found it quite a rare and local plant. Hieracium umbellatum, Linn. Local. This and H. Filosella were the only species of the genus .met with. Specularia Iiybrida, A. DC. Thurlestone, one plant among potatoes. Vinca minor, Linn. Spread from cultivation at East Town and South Pool. . Erijthraa pulchcUa, Fries. In one spot between Kingsbridge and Salcombe. Conrolvulus Soldanella, Linn. Thurlestone Sands. Hi/osci/amus nigcr, Linn. North Sands, near Salcombe. Sparingly, as is usually the case with the Henbane. Verbascum. rirgatnm, With. In a grass-field, between Icings- bridge and Salcombe ; one plant seen at Thurlestone. Scrophularia Scorodonia, Linn. The abundance of this about FLORA OF THE EXTREME SOUTH OF DEVON. 297 the town of Kingsbrklge is a most noticeable feature in its botany. It must have been discovered here many years ago, for there is a specimen, labelled " Kingsbridge, Devon, Aug. 1845. C. Harper," among a collection of plants, in the possession of Mr. N. Easton, a gentleman of Plymouth ; but its occurrence has been well-nigh lost sight of by the botanists of the neighbourhood. Not only did my brother and I find it in plenty on the hedge-banks all around the town, but occurring in many spots some miles beyond it. In a south-easternly dh'ection we found it in plenty on to a little beyond Charleton, also near East Tow^n, occurring again in considerable quantity in a hedge by the lane as you go up the hill from Frog- moor by the telegraph whes; also near the hamlet of Ford, ascending on a sheltered bank between that and Chivelstone, three to four miles from Kingsbridge, to 400 feet. South of Kingsbridge, on the lower road to Salcombe, we noticed it on to the little vale on the southern side of CoUapit. On the south-west it occurred in plenty at West Alvington, and we discovered an outlying patch within a quarter of a mile of Marlborough village, at 820 feet, nearly four miles from Kingsbridge; and another close to the hamlet of Bantham, in the parish of Thurlestone, on the eastern bank of the Avon estuary. The flowers of S. Scorodonia are rather brighter-coloured than those of either nodosa or Balbisii, the purjDle taking more of a reddish tint ; and it is decidedly the prettiest of the three species. We noticed wasps to be as partial to its flow^ers as they are to those of the other two. It must not be supposed that the mica-slate formation has anythmg to do with the occur- rence of this plant, as it is not on this rock, but on the Devonian slate, that it grows in so great quantity. Bartsia Odontites, Huds., a. verna and b. serotma. Both in the district. B. viscosa, Linn. Starall Bottom ; Prawle. Mentha rotundifolia, Linn. Quite a common plant; more abundant than about Plymouth, and I am disposed to think indigenous in some spots. M. sativa, Linn. A form of this approaching b. paludosa was seen between West Alvington and Marlborough. Out of the district, between Modbury and Aveton Griff ord, excellent paludosa occurs. . M. Pulegium, Linn. In considerable quantity between Kings- bridge and Salcombe, near CoUapit, growing in fields, and sparingly about the sides of the road ; in an open turfy spot above Sewer Gove. Probably indigenous ; if not so, certainly quite estabhshed. It occurs m very similar spots in the parish of Holbeton, lying between this and Plymouth, by Bigbury Bay. Very few Devonian stations are recorded for the Penn^Toyal. Salvia Verhenaca, Lmn. Seen only near Salcombe. Melittis Melissojjhyllum, Linn. Near Kingsbridge, by the lower road to Salcombe. Stachys amhiyua, Sm. Near Salcombe, and in one or two other spots. Myosotis repens, Don. This would seem to be the common 2q 298 FLORA OF THE EXTKE.ME SOUTH OF DEVON- AVater Forget-me-uot of the tract, as about Plymouth. .V. caspitosa was seen Hkewise, but not jxihistris. Ancluim sruipervirens, Linn. Thurlestone, and hi one or two other spots. I do not think it an indigenous species ; though it is now common in Devon. Ci/n<>(/l(issu)n officinale, Linn. Prawle, sparingly between the village and the point. Puujiiicida Imitamca, Linn. Li the bog above Sewer Cove, with Drosera and Xartliecium. Centuncuhis ■)inninuis, Linn. On the damp turfy waste close to Prawle village. Statice Jnnerrosa, G. E. Sm. On the low cliffs by Sewer Cove; a form looking to me intermediate between vars. a. occidentalis and b. i)itt'nuc(Ua. liumc.c rupcstris, Le Gall. In tolerable quantity on rocks at Sewer Cove. This is the most easterly station in the kingdom at which the plant has been certainly found. It keeps up its characters well here. B. pmtemis, M. & K. Bolt Head, &c. Polyf/omon avicuJarc, Linn., c. aremn^tnim . Frogmoor. P. Eaii, Bab. Thurlestone Sands. P. cui}])hiJniun, Linn., b. terrestre. Flowering sparingly in a marsh at Thurlestone; South Sands, near Salcombe. EupJiorbia amij/jdaloidcn, Linn. Lane between lungsbridge and Salcombe, &c. I'J. portlandica, Linn. Sewer Cove. Scilla autninnalis, Linn. Bolt Head ; Prawle Point. Allium vinealc, Linn., c. co)ii pactum. Hedge-bank near Prawle Point. Luzula Forsteri, DC. Between Kingsbridge and Salcombe ; as also L. sijlratica. Juncus maritimus, Sm. Marsh at Blanks Mill. A common plant in this part of England. Scirpiis Sacii, S. & M. Prawle. Another species, S. acicularis, we did not find anywhere in the tract about Kingsbridge, but discovered growing plentifully in pools and pits in a salt marsh by the Avon, at Aveton Gilibrd. So far as I know the only recorded station for acicularis in the county is that in the ' Flora Devoniensis,' " Streams at Kora, near Ilsington," near the border of Dartmoor. S. Tahermcmontani, Gmel. Marsh at Thurlestone. Caie.v divulsa, Good. Common around Kingsbridge. ('. distans, Linn. Sewer Cove. C. extmsa. Good. Between Kingsbridge and Salcombe. C. riparia, Curtis. Thurlestone. Arena str((/osa, Schreb. Two or three plants near Prawle village. A.fatua, Linn. A common weed in corn, &c., about Kings- bridge. Sclerorhloa procuinhens, Beauv. By the roadway on the eastern side of the tidal water below Kingsbridge. S. loiiacra, Woods. Wall-top at Bantham. balansa's fernh of paeaguay. 299 Pna nemoralis, Linn. On a wall at East Town. Festuca Fseudo-mijuriis. Soyer. On a wall at Bantbam. F. ovina, Linn., form of. A densely caespitose form, with very glaucous wiry leaves, grows on Bolt Head. I take it to be tbe var. c. glauca of Eng. Bot. 3. Bi'oimis asper, Murr. Only seen about South Pool. Triticwn aciitum, DC. Thurlestone Sands. T. junceum, Linn. Thurlestone Sands. Asplenium hinceolatum., Huds. Sewer ; near Ford ; Prawle. Xephrodmm aimidum, Baker. Hedge-bank by a lane near Ford. LIST OF BALANSA'S FERNS OF PARAGUAY, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THE NEAV SPECIES. By J. G. Bakee, F.R.S. As very little has been known about the Ferns of Paraguay, and the i^lants recently collected there by Balansa have l)een widely distributed amongst the princiiml European herbaria, I send a list of the determinations of those included in the set which I have had the opportunity of studying. The numbers prefixed to the names are those under which the plants were sent out, and the second number in brackets indicates the position of the novelties, according to the sequence followed in our ' Synopsis Filicum.' Excluding of coiu-se the novelties, all the species are known ah-eady either in Brazil or the Argentine territory, except Gymnogramme leptophijlla, which has been collected by Spruce and others in the Andine region but is new to the east side of Tropical America. 373. Gleichenia pubescem, H.B.K., with a small piece of G. dichotoma. 303. Hemitelia setosa, Mett. 304. 648, 648a. Alsophila atrovirens, Presl. 305. ,, pdafjiopteris, Mart. 317. Dicksonia cicutaria, Sw. 316. ,, ,, var. D. incisa, Fee. 849. Tnchomanes crispum, Sw. 807. Ceratopterin thcdictroides, Brong. 389. Cheilanthes radiata, R. Br. 357, 357b. ,, cldoroplujUa, Sw. 359. ,, inicrophijlla, Sw. 858 [36=''] . Cheilanthes recurvata, Baher, n. sp. Stipes densely tufted, glabrous, 4-6 in. long, slender, fragile, channelled down the face, with only a few small linear scales near the base. Lamina oblong- deltoid, green on both sides, glabrous, moderately firm in texture, 3-4-pinnate, 5-6 in. long, 3-5 in. broad. Rachises castaneous and quite naked, not flexuose. Pinnae deltoid, the 3-4 lowest pairs subequal, rather produced on the lower side, l|-2 in. long ; pinnnules linear, remote, spreading from the rachis at right 800 balansa's feens of Paraguay. angles ; tertiary segments sessile, roundish, distant, not more than half a line broad, erenate, with the edges much recurved, only tlie very lowest sometimes again compound, the end ones of the 13innules deeply flabellately cleft, Sori marginal, hidden by the recurved edge of the segments, the indusium only the very edge of the lamina slightly altered in texture. Rocky slopes of the Cerro Lambare, November, 1876. A very distinct species, most like C. Fiegnelliana, Mett., but much more compound, and the small distant ultimate segments not so decidedly buUate. We have a closely-allied plant fi'om Glaziou, not yet described, which differs by its remarkably flexuose rachises. 368. Adiantum delicatuJum, Mart. 371. ,, cuncatum, L. & F. 867, 370. ,, (BmuJum, Moore, = cuncatum var. vuijus, Baker, in Fl. Bras. 366. ,, ccthiopicum, Linn. 372. Pteris defiexa, Lmk. 385. ,, dmticulata, Sw. 361,364.,, i^edata, Linn. 362. ,, eleyans, Vellozo. 360. Cassebeera triphijlla, Kaulf. 380. Lomaria attemiata, Willd. 378. Blechnum hrasilieiise, Desv. 326. ,, Lanceola, Sw. 879, 383. „ occidentalc, Linn. 381,382. „ unilaterale, WilU. 340. Asplenium serratwn, Linn. 384. ,, mucronatum, Presl. 391. ,, formosum, Willd. 844,344a. ,, micro2)teron, BBjkev. This i3retty little plant, a near ally of A. funtcmwn, was only known before fi-om a single specimen gathered by Pearce at San Luis, in the Argentine territory. 854. Asplenium divergens, Mett., doubtless not distinct specifically from fragans. 355. ,, lumdatum, Sw. 356. ,, abscissiim, Willd. 318. ,, [Athyriuin) decurtatum, Lmk. 319,319a. ,, {JHjjlazium) Shepherdi, ^]}veng. 839. Scoh)pcndrium hrasiUensc, Kunze. 388. ,, jjlcmtagincum, Sclirad. 341. Didgmuchla'na lumdata, Desv. 323a. Aspidium aculeatum var. plicgoptcroidcum, Baker, in Fl. Bras. 809a. Xcphrodium caripcnse, Hook. 311, 815. ,, conterwinum, Desv. 820, 321. „ cfumm,-B^\iQY. 814. ,, wiitufii, R. Br. 312, 312a, 653. ,, uiolle, Besw. 308. ,, (Sagenia) macroplujlJuui, Baker. BALANSA'h FEENS of PARAGUAY. 301 313, 313a. Poly podium [Phegopteris) connexum, Kaiilf. 667. ,, elasticmn, Kich. 386. ,, jjectinatum ., Linn. 887. ,, cJmoopjhorum, Kunze. 388 [178'''] . PoLYPODiUM PAEAGUAYENSE, Baker, n.sp. Eliizome wide-creexDing. Scales small, lanceolate acuminate, bright brown, confined to the rhizome and very base of the stipes. Stipes wiry, brownish, naked, 2-3 in. long. Lamina oblong-lanceolate, simply pinnate, 12-15 in. long, 5-6 in. broad at the middle, moderately firm in textm-e, not elastic, green on both sides, obscurely pubescent. Eachis slender, why, brownish, finely pubescent. ( Pinn» 30-40-jugate, linear, spreading almost horizontally, the largest 2|-3 in. long, |- in. broad, adnate by the whole dilated base, contiguous except the 3-4 lowest pairs, which are a little reduced, distinctly crenate, narrowed gradually from the middle to an acute point. Veins distinct, 30-40-jugate, all except the upper- most bearing 2-4 branches, the single sorus placed at the tip of the lowest anterior branch midway between the midrib and edge of the pinnae. Sori uniserial, round, medial. Forests at the base of the Cerro Pelado, near Villa Kica. Allied to P. reciuratum, Kaulf., from which it may be known at a glance by its distinct pinnate veins. 313. Polypjodimn anyustum, Mett. 345. ,, incanmn, Sw. 345a. , , , , var. squalidum, Baker, in Fl. Bras. 329. ,, lepidopteris, Kunze. 348a. ,, vacciniifoUum, L. & F. 347. ,, lycojjodioides, Linn. 365. ,, Phyllitidis, Linn. 324. Menisciian serratmn, Car. 377. Vittaria lineata, Sw. 330 [4"]. NoTocHLiENA Balans^, i^ftA'er, n. sp. Ehizome stout, short-creeping, densely clothed with linear and at the growing point with subulate bright brown scales. Stipes contiguous, why, ^ brown, 1^3 in. long, matted with rusty brown tomentum, as is the rachis and lower surface of the lamina. Frond lanceolate, regularly bipinnate from the base nearly up to the tip, 6-8 in. long, l-lj in. broad, firm in texture, green and nearly naked above, matted all over with tomentum beneath. PinnaB subsessile, linear, ascending, -|— f in. long, ^\ in. broad, cut down all through to the midiib into spreading entire contiguous adnate linear-oblong obtuse pinnules. Veins hidden. Sori continuous all round the entire fiat edge of the pinnules. Escarped banks of the Eio Paraguay, at Assumption. General habit of Cheilanthes micromera . 351. Gymnoyramme lepjtophylla, Desv. 327. ,, rufa, Desv. 335, 337. ,, calomelanos, Kaulf. 386. ,, trifoliata, Desv. 333 [51"-] . GrYMNOGRAMME (Ceroi^teris) longipes, Jkiker, n.sp. ^ Caudcx erect. Stipes tufted, bright castaneous, above a foot long, 302 NOVAS GENERIS SHORE.^ SPECIES DUAS. with only a few small spreading lanceolate scales near the base. Lamina lanceolate, 2-3-pinnate, 1-2 ft. long, 2-4 in. broad, moderately firm in texture, green and glabrous on the upper surface, covered all over on the under side with bright yellow powder. PiniifB nearly sessile, deltoid, the lower ones remote and diminished, the central ones 2-3 in. long, caudate, cut down below to the racliis into linear-oblong toothed or at the base com- pound pinnules. Veins close, distinct. Sori reaching from the midi'ib to the edge. Assumption, in damp soil ; and 334 a var. concolor of the same species, entirely destitute of the yellow meal. This would be a fine plant to introduce into cultivation. It comes midway between trifoliatd and the ochrdcca variety of calomelanos. 390 [9'''] . AcEosTicHUM (Elaphogiossum) TENERUM, Baker, n.s]). Khizome short-creeping. Scales scarcely any. Stipe of barren Ay frond, slender, stramineous, 2-5 in. long. Lamina linear, membranous, glabrous, bright green on both sides, 6-9 in. long, 1 in. broad at the middle, irregularly crenulate, narrowed gradually fi-om the midtUe to both ends. Veins moderately close, distinct, simple or forked, rather ascending, produced from the midrib to the edge. Fertile frond as long as the barren one, but much naiTower (^ in. broad), on a stipe of the same length. Caaguazu, on the shady banks of rivers. Comes in between A. simjde.v and Burchellii. 376. Lyyodium venustuin, Sw. 374. Osmund a cinnamomea, Linn. 331. Anemia PhijUitidis, Sw. 332. ,, tomentosa, Sw. 328. Oj)liioglossum nudicaide, Linn. fil. 1117. Lycopodivm cernuum,, Linn. 1118. ,, alopeciiroides, Linn. 1120. Schifjinella rupestris, Spring. 1116. ,, convoluta, Spring. NOVAS GENERIS SHORE. E SPECIES DUAS PROPONIT Henr. F. Hance, Ph.D., Soc. Linn. Lond. sodalis, cet. 1. Shoeea Pierrei, sp. nov. Ramis cortice iiigricanti glabro obductis, ramulis angulatis dense grisco-stellato-tomentosis, stipulis ....?, foliis rigido coriaceis ovato-oblongis basi lata obtusis apice breviter acuminatis 3-4 poll, longis 1^-2^ poll, latis utrhique glaberrimis lucidis costa costulisque supra impressis subtus elevatis his ad utrumque latus circ. 12 tenuibus angulo 52 ° egressis arcuatis petiolo 8-lineali glabro ruguloso, panicuhB 3-4 pollicaris dense cinereo-tomentosa3 ramulis 8-10, floribus . . . ?, nuce breviter pedicellata ovoidea 4-lincali dense cinereo-tomentosa, calycis fructiferi basibus accretis dense cinereo-tomentosis lobis 2 majoribus 2 poll, longis 5 lin. latis minoribus ad 1-1 i poll, longis ON THE PLACENTA OF PRIMULACE^. 303 1:1-2 lin. latis obloiigis obtusis teniiiter 10-nervibus et reticnlatis membranaceis flaventi-badiis dense glandiiloso-piibescentibus. Ill Cambodia a cl. Pierre detecta ; sine numero vel loci natalis speciali indicatione, commimicavit cl. inventor. (Herb, propr. n. 20173.) Foliorum crassitudine venatione et aspectn refert .S'. stipularem, Thw. et S. liijpochrani, Hance ; ab utraque calyce fructifero miilto minore, ei S. selaniccc, Bl. non dissimili, recedit. 2. Shoeea Scheffeeiana, sp. nov. Ramiilis tenuiter subochraceo- furfuracies, stipulis . . . ?, foliis membranaceis oblongis basi rotim- datis V. cuneatis apice acuminatis 6-7 poll, longis 1-^2^ poll, latis supra lucidiilis praeter costam stellato-tomentosam glaberrimis subtus opacis ocliraceis costa valida costiilisque subtus prominulis glaberrimis liis ad utrumqne latus 12-14 tenuibiis angiilo 40° egressis apice arciiatis nervulis transversis obtectis petiolo 8-lineali tomentello, paiiicnlaruni axillarium 4-5 pollicarium stellato tomeii- tellarum ramulis 10-12 patentibus G-8-fioris, floribus sessilibus, calycis canescenti-tomentosi laciniis imbricatis ovatis obtusis lineam longis, petalis ligulatis Ih lin. longis f lin. latis extus' cano-sericeis intus glabris, staminibus circ. 20 antlieris obtusis connectivo subulato 3-setigero, ovario liirsuto, stylo brevi glaberrimo stigmate simplici, fructu . . . '? Ad Sambas, ins. Borneo, ubi indigeiiis TcHfjkaivcuu/ saloenrj soeng audit. Commimicavit am. Dr. Sclieffer, sub n. 6526. Foliorum forma et textu accedit >S'. selanica, BL, et S. ohlongi- fulicB, Tliw. Adnot. — Abliinc annos undecim accepi a cl. Teijsmann SJiorecB speciem alteram ex insula Borneo, nomine vernaculo Tewjkawang pinang inscriptam, cliaracteri S. Martiniana:, Sclieff.,''' optime con- gruentem, nisi quod fructus, a specimine florigero sejunctas habuit calycinas lacinias majores oblongo-lineares, obtusissimas, circiter 12-nerves, rigide coriaceas, 5^ poll, longas, 17 lin. latas. Nescio an hie fructus divers89 speciei pertinuerit : am. Sclieffer stii-pi suae lacinias calycinas fructiferas tantum bix^ollicares adscripsit. ON THE PLACENTA OF PJUMI'LACE.dE. By G. S. Boulger, F.L.S. In reading Dr. Masters' interesting paper on the Morphology of the Primulacecc (Linn. Trans., series IL, vol. i., part 5), I was much struck with the following passage on Pr'unula (p. 288) : — *' Within the rudimentary pistil .... the receptacle changes its former fiat or dej)ressed condition for a convex or dome-shaped appearance ; the middle portion of this dome becomes covered with ovules from above duicmcards ; the upper portion elongates into a naked cone ; and the lower portion forms a stipes, which is apparently quite free from the walls of the pistil." * SclieflFer, ' Observ. pliyiographicae,' iii. 86, 304 ON THE PLACENTA OF PRIMULACEiE. I had just read in the Enghsh edition of Sachs' ' Text-Book,' ]). 149, that — " Simihir and equivalent lateral members usually arise on the common axial structure in acro^^etal or basifugal order, i. e. the younger a member is the nearer it is to the ai3ex ; counting from below upwards, the members occur in the order of their age. The lateral members which are formed from the X3unctum vegetationis of an axial structm-e sufficiently near the growing apex are apparently always acropetal; but the order is disturbed when lengthening at the a^jex ceases and new formations occur at the primary meristem below, as in many flowers." This last-mentioned disturbing influence is not apparent in PniuuhicccB, so that 1 doubted whether the ovules of that order were not all to be looked upon as adventitious, if not trichomic. On p. 497 Sachs says — <' In a few cases the floral axis rises free withm the spacious cavity of the ovary, and produces ovules laterally, as occurs in Priiinihicece,'' illustrating the remark by figures of the floral development of AnagulUs arvensLs, which seem to correspond to Dr. Masters' account of Primula. On p. 503 Sachs refers approvingly to Cramer's conclusions that the nucleus is a lateral structure on the funiculus, and that the ovule of Primiilacece being a whole leaf, the nucleus in this order is a formation on its surface, analogous, I suppose, to the common abnormal outgrowth from the midrib of cabbage-leaves. On turning for any further elucidation to Payer's ' Organogenie dela fleur,' I find, on p. 612, the following account of the pistil in Samolus Videyandi : — " Peu de temps apres lanaissance des etamines, le centre de la fleur se deprime et il en resulte une petite excavation, qui est I'origine du pistil. Cette petite excavation n'occupe pas tout le centre de la fleur ; il y a entre elle et la base des etamines une sorte de chemin de halage sur lequel on voit bientot poindre un bourrelet circulaire qui grandit rapidement, et forme une sorte de tuyau de cheminee au-dessus de I'excavation qui, de son cote, est devenue de plus en ^dIus profonde. On a par suite an centre de la fleur un pistil forme a la partie inferieure jpar la coupe recep- taculaire, et a la partie superieure par ce bourrelet devenu style. Pendant que ces modifications se produisent a I'exterieur, le fond de la coupe receptaculaire qui etait d'abord plat se bombe dans son milieu, et il en resulte un tubercule central qui grossit et se recoavre (Vocules du sonimet a la base, en un mot un veritable placente central." The accompanying plates agree exactly with Dr. Masters'. It is often the case, as Trecul has shown, that the fibro- vascular bundles are late formations in comparison with the cellular tubercles in which floral organs begin. This is only another way of saying that leaves first appear as a bulging out of the dermatogen, owing to a luxuriant growth of the underlying periblem, and that the extension of the fibro-vascular system into the plerome is a later phase. (See Sachs, op. cit., p. 134). Never- theless with the beautiful figures of Payer and Dr. Masters before one, and remembering what timely service the fibro-vascular bundles rendered Darwin in his unravelling of Orchids, it was SHOKT NOTES. 305 natural to lament the absence of more liiglily magnified dissections. On turning, therefore, to the English edition of Le Maout and Decaisne, p. 529, I was much struck by the figure representing the fruit of Cyclamen cut vertically, in which two sepals are cut away, and what are apr)arently two fibro-vascular bundles, each having three visible terminal branches, are represented on the surface of the section of the large central placenta. If this figure be correct, '•' and a similar structure occur in the other genera, it would seem that we have in this order five congenitally suppressed lateral branch tubercles to the axial placenta, i. e. five lateral growing- points. Possibly fm-tlier suppressed branching, as indicated by the bundles, may give origin to further mtercalary zones of growth, and the ai3j)arently abnormal basix3etal development of the ovules may be thus explained. SHOKT NOTES. EuMEx MAXI3IUS. — You may be interested in a new locality for this plant. Having noticed some strongly cordate leaves (which I had decided to be those of it. maMmus) at Alfiiston, on the Cuck- mere Kiver, East Sussex, in June last, I went there on August 12th to see the fi*uit. I then found that both leaves and fruit correspond to R. inaxiinus of very extreme form (as I think you will see from the s^Decimens I now send you). I wish to draw attention to the strongly cordate or subcordate form of the leaves in all stages of growth ; the shape of the very young leaves is especially striking. I could find no R. Hydrolapatlium at this locality, and hardly anything at all approaching it. That species is also absent from Mr. Warren's Lewes locality for R. maximus, though abundant enough in other parts of the O.use about Lewes. R. maximiis does not with us attain the size, either in leaves or in stem, that R. Hijdrolapathum does; it cannot therefore be correct to attribute its peculiar characteristics to luxuriance. — J. H. A. Jenner. [The specimens kindly sent with the above note are the best and most typical R. maximus I have seen from any part of England. The young leaves are broadly oval or sub-ovate, and remind one at first sight of it*. ohtusifoUus. The county of Hants may also be added to the area of this ^olant in England, Mr. F. J. Warner ha\dng found it abundantly near Winchester. — Ed. Journ. BOT.] KuBus PuRCHAsii, Blox. (sce p. 2.08). — This plant was found by the Eev. A. Bloxam and myself, in the hedge of a meadow near the Overhurst Farm, in the parish of Alstonfield, about two years ago. I had taken Mr. Bloxam, who was sx)ending a few days here, to see Paihusfissiis growing about the banks of a streamlet at * A brief examination of some dried capsules of Cyclamen lead me to think Decaisne's figure to be perfectly accurate. 2e 306 NOTICES OI'^ B(30KS AND MEMOIRS. the lower end of tlie meadow o^DiDosite the farm-house in question, and on our way to the sjDot I noticed, and called Mr. B.'s attention to, this E2iJ)}is, as being one which I could not identify. Mr. Bloxam said that he could not name it, and in fact that it was new to him. We each took specimens, and on his return home Mr. B. wrote me, on Sept. 8, 1876, as follows : — '* I have carefully examined the Eiibm growing near B. Jissus. It seems nearer allied to R. (jlamJulosus, subv. dcntatus, of Babington, p. 249 of his 'Eubi,' than any other Ihihiis that I know. It has the zigzag rachis of the (hmtatiis, but it is much stronger in its armature. This may arise from its growing in an open situation, whereas the plant near Twycross is in a plantation." I next sent a si^ecimen to the Hon. J. L. Warren, with a request for his opinion. In his reply, dated Sept. 10, 1876, he says : — "I fear I cannot help you in regard of the plant you now kindly enclose from Alstonfield. I think very likely (with Mr. Bloxam) that the form is uiidescribed, and I do not know at present any foreign name suitable. If I had to put it under a British one, it would go in my mind, with great doubt, to li.fusco-atcr." After communicating this oi)inion to Mr. Bloxam, he (Mr. B.) wrote thus on Sept. 30, 1876 : — " I can make nothing of the Piiibus at present near you. It is a remarkable form ; the upper part of the rachis is very glandular, but not so on the lower portion or on the barren stem. I have seen hundreds of specimens of \fusco-att'r,' but I feel assured it has nothing to do with that. I shall call it at present li. Piirchasii, unless I can make it out under some continental form or name." I will only add that there is very little of the i^lant, and that last year it was so cut in pruning the hedge that I could get no specimens. I hoi^e to learn more of it hereafter. — W. H. Pukchas. ACERAS ANTHROPOPHORA, B)'., IN NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. Thc Only reliable habitats for this plant hitherto have been the quarries of Barnack and Southorpe, where it is very abundant. I was pleased to find it, in last i\Iay, on the quarries of Colly weston and Easton veiy plentifully, where it is associated with Arahis hirsuta, Hippo- cirpis .roiiiosa, and Genista tinctoyia. The two latter are new records, and the Arahis is marked ? in ' Topographical Botany.' Colly weston is nearly six miles N.W. from Barnack, and is dramed by the Welland ; Southorpe being in the Neiie system. — G. C. Druce. Kottct$5 of ISoofts auU ilttmoivs, The Student, s Flora of the British Islands. By Sir J. D. Hooker, K.C.S.I., C.B., &c. Second Edition. London: Macmillan. 1878. (Pp. 540.) The eight years that have elapsed since the publication of the first edition of this useful Elora, have, so far n,s P>ritisli botany is concerned, been less prolific in close and critical work among our NOTICES OF EOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 307 native Phanerogams than some smiilar periods within the memory of hving botanists. This is due not to botanists being less numerous or less keen, but to botanical work being diverted into other channels. There is an increasing class of cryptogamic specialists, esiDecially of mycologists ; the facility of foreign travel leads to much attention being paid to exotic plants which was formerly devoted to our own flora ; but above all there is a new school of botanists rising, to whom the systematic study of British plants is quite uncongenial. In place of the old-fashioned botanizing in the field and the study of ordinal, generic and specific characters and differences, which have hitherto been the grammar of botany to English students and formed the foundation of the knowledge of very nearly all the leading botanists in this country, the young student now substitutes a course of reading about in- vestigations in development, histology, and growth which have been mainly carried out in the laboratories of other countries, and indulges in speculations on evolution and the acquirement of distinctive characters. It is unnecessary to express here any opinion as to the general results of this change. It is probable that in the future it will become still more marked ; and the class of " good British botanists," of whom Watson, Borrer, Boswell and Babington may be cited as examples, is scarcely likely to be ever again so strongly and prominently represented as it has been. The eminent author of the present text-book was never one of that fraternity ; his work has been of a far wider scope. Hence one does not expect, in a new edition of the ' Student's Flora,' to find the amount of work and alteration which has made each successive edition of Babington's * Manual ' so interesting to the student of our native plants. Accordingly, beyond the intercalation of the additional species found to be British since 1870, and a general but slight revision of the text, there is little alteration in the book, and from the author's point of view no more could be required. The plan and general execution of the ' Flora ' were all that could be wished, and no changes of a comj)rehensive character were needed. But more care might well have been expended on details, and especially on proof-correcting. Many of the numerous slips are no doubt due to haste, but one does not expect in a second edition to see those of the former one reproduced to so great an extent as is here the case. All the following (and many more might be cited) have been handed on from the first edition. Linn, is still given as the authority for Erojjhila verna and Nuphar luteum. The description of the fruit of Sambucus is singularly incorrect, and that of Daphne Laiireola is called a drupe, whilst Z>. Mezereum is termed a berry. Coniiim has not a constricted com- missure, and the general involucre of Carum Cariii frequently consists of four or five leaves. The common Yarrow has not an elongate receptacle, nor has the fruit of Lactuca virosa a "■ cellular wing," whatever that may be. Orohanche carulea has four not five calyx-lobes; under Atriplex laciniata "cuneate" seems to be a mis- print for connate, and under Triticum caninum "2-5-awued" for 2-5 -nerved. Such things are very misleading to the student, and 308 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIES. his astonishment will be great to read that the wood of Conifera; has no medullary rays, and that the male catkin of the Yew has but one anther ; the short description of the female cone of Jun (perns is mcorrect in five or six i)oints. Such examples show how much the book needed a thorough revision by a botanist of the critical kind; perhaps one could scarcely expect the author to do it himself. It says much for the skill displayed in its preparation that-, in spite of its many errors, one must still regard it as the most comprehensive and compact, and in some respects the best, book of its class. H. T. The Organic ConstituenU of Plants and Vegetable Substances, and their Chemical Anah/sis. By Dr. Gr. C. Wittstein. Authorised Translation from the German original, enlarged with nu- merous Additions b}^ Bakon Feed. Von Mueller. Melbourne : M'Carron, Bird & Co. 1878. Pp. 330. About twenty years ago Eochleder collected, in his ' Anleitung zur Analyse von Pflanzen und Pflanzeutheilen,' the chief results which had up to that time been arrived at during the investigation of the organic constituents of plants, and placed before the student a sketch of the history of this branch of science and an outline of the methods which had been found of service for the extraction and examination of the active principles which plants contain. Ten years later, iu 1868, Dr. Wittstein, of Munich, published his * Anleitung zur chemischen Analyse von Pflanzentheilen auf ihre organischen Bestandtheile,' which formed a fitting supplement to Rochleder's work. • It has now been translated by Baron von Mueller at his own private cost, and, with the many additions he has provided bringing the literature of the subject down to the present date, it forms a handy volume which will be of value as a work of reference both to the botanist and the chemist. Two-thirds of the volume is devoted to a detailed description, in alphabetical order, of the proximate constituents of plants and vegetable substances, their properties, their mode of preparation, and qualitative examination. The old formulae, now rarely to be met with in our text-books of chemistry, have been retained ; the new formulaB are, however, given in the table of the molecular weights of organic compoimds which follows next, so that they can easily be ascerttiined by a cross reference. He then gives a synopsis' of the plants which yield the proximate constituents ah-eady referred to, as well as a list of the plants sj^stematically arranged according to then' Orders :. here a cross reference would have been useful. The second part of the work is devoted to a description of the ai)paratus employed in analysis and the chemical reagents requked, and a consideration of the various methods of using them for the extraction of the active principle contained in the plant under investigation. Some of the expressions he employs are not quite in accordance with those in general use, such as " hypermanganate of potash," " oxyd of lead,"' " white of lead," " sulphur et of hydro- NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 309 gen," " tartarate of antimony," and ''chloride of bar yum," and should be corrected in a new edition. The atomic weights of carbonate of lime and oxalate of lime, given respectively as 625 and 1025, are not those adopted in other parts of the work, or in fact in any text-book of the present day, aiid will puzzle the student. When dealing with the preparation of certain substances, like cyanine or anthocyan, the method of preparing it is given; but we fail to find any reference to the flowers from which this curious body can with advantage be extracted. When w^e look up " Cellu- lose " we are referred to " Fibrin," which, however, is not given at all ; the properties of cellulose are treated of under the heading "Fiber," where we seek in vain for any reference to Durin's remarkable observations on the conversion of cane-sugar into cellu- lose: By far the most interesting researches in the branch of organic chemistry treated of in this work are those which have resulted in the synthetical formation of some of the more impor- tant constituents of plants — for example, the synthesis of indigo effected by Emmerling and Engler, of alizarine by Graebe and Liebermann, and of conine by Hugo Schiff ; we fail, however, to find any record of these very valuable contributions to our know- ledge of plant-chemistry. The base occurring in Mercurialis annua and M. perennis, which had been termed, for want of a better name, mercurialine, was shown some time since by Schmidt to be mono- methylamine. Monomethylamine is a body of very simple consti- tution, and the fact that its presence has been detected in a plant is one of the greatest importance and interest. A series of tables of the specific gravity of alcohol of different degrees of concentration, of atomic and molecular weights, and of thermometric scales, form the conclusion of the volume. A book of the kind which Baron von Mueller has aimed to provide for scientific students is much wanted. If a second edition of this translation of Wittstein should be called for, the translator may materially improve this work, in fact might produce the text- book which is at present sought for, by submitting these pages, at present singularly free from idiom, to an English friend for revision, and to the scrutiny of a reader acquainted with the form and style of the chemical nomenclature now in use. W. F. Monographic Phanerofjnmarum, Prodromi nunc Continuatio nunc Eevisio. Auctoribus Alphonso et Casimir DeCandolle, alhsque botanicis ultra memoratis. Vol. I. Smilacea, Restiacea, Meliacca. Parisiis, G. Masson. June, 1878. The conclusion of the* ' Prodromus' with the seventeenth volume, in 1873, gave Prof. DeCandolle the opportunity of placing before botanists the reasons which rendered it impossible for him to continue that great work in a systematic manner. '•'■ The promise which he then also gave of publishing a sort of con- tinuation in the form of monographs of natural families, in any See Journ. Bot., 1874, p. 58. 310 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. sequence in which they could be obtained from botanists, he now fulfils by the issue of this volume. It will be seen from the title that of the three Orders com- prised in the book two are monocotyledonous, and therefore are in continuation of the original 'Prodromus'; the other, MeliacecB, was treated in its proper sequence in the first volume of that work, dated 1824. The changes to be noted in the character of the book result chiefly from the greater freedom of treatment allowed to the authors ; two of the monographs are illustrated by plates of flower-analyses, and two have long introductions in French on points relating to the Order in general. These are useful additions to the old plan, the descriptions are also usually fuller, and there are more copious references to herbaria. In the book, as a book, there are some alterations also ; the page is much larger, but as the type is also larger and more spread there is perhaps actually less matter in it ; the specific names are printed in a thick type ; and, what is of far greater importance, there is a complete index to species at the end of the volume. When such changes were making it would have been easy to have initiated another. The want of a distinguishing type for the synonyms has been always felt in using the old volumes, and the innovation of italics would have been a greater improvement than the larger type and more bulky volume not uniform in size with its predecessors. It is to be regretted, too, that the printers have fallen into so many blunders which remain uncorrected ; the list of errata given is by no means exhaustive. Prof. A. DeCandolle himself fitly and worthily commences the new work by a very elaborate and careful monograph of the Smilncea:,, a group which jDresents unusual difficulties to the systematist from the very imperfect state in which it is repre- sented in even the best herbaria, both as to number of species and condition of specimens. M. DeCandolle has the following observations upon the collections he has examined: — "I have been struck with the existing poverty of the largest herbaria. That of Berlin, the most rich in Smilncea of those which I have had for examination, contains only half of the described species; that of Kew, although I have not seen it, may probably possess more ; but the herbaria of the Paris Museum, my own and that of the St. Petersburg garden, have less than half the species ; the herbaria of Vienna, Munich, Florence, of M. Boissier and the Delessert herbarium follow these closely ; whilst the others remain singularly below. It is extraordinary that herbaria do not grow in proportion to the facilities' of travel. I will further add that I consider it a scandal to our time — so satisfied with itself — that the existing species of plants are not represented in some of the principal herbaria by at least fom'-fifths, and arranged in each family according to the best or most recent monograph. The condition in which one finds si)ccimens is not less to be regretted. In Smilacece, for instance, i^laiits usually dicEcious, a very large number of species are only known from NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIES. 311 male examples, and some only by female ones. By the liel^D of many different herbaria I have partially filled up the deficiencies, but there still remain far too many species of which the female flower is miknoYm." In opposition to Mr. Bentham, but in accordance with many other botanists, SmilacecB here ranks as an order distinct from Liliacew, a position to which it appears fully entitled. M. De CandoUe gives an interesting account of the morphology of the leaves, inflorescence and flowers in the Order ; he recognizes three genera, Heterosmilax, Smilcw, and Fihipoi/omuu, the first and .last with but 5 species each, whilst Sunla.r possesses no less than 209. (Hhjosmilax, Seem., is reduced to Heterosmilax, and Nemesia, Pleiosmilax and Coprosmanthus to Smilax. This last great genus is divided into four sections defined by the number of stamens (six or more than six) the existence of two or one ovule in each cell of the ovary, and the concave or reflexed perianth- leaves of the male flower ; in the further divisions the ^nature of the inflorescence affords characters. As to species of Smila.v, Kunth's monograph, published in 1850, contained 193, of which 52 were doubtful and 12 more only known by name ; of the 209 in the present memoir only 22 are doubtful or unknown. The species here described for the first time are 55 in number, whilst 30 of Kunth's have been reduced. The author says that he has abstained from publishing or even naming a number of new species, of which he has seen merely fragments in herbaria, as to do so would be to throw into science mere puzzles and difficulties. Would that all descriptive botanists had an equal restraint ! Restiacew is another very troublesome family, which Dr. Masters has already much helped to elucidate by previous memoirs. In this complete monograph the sum of the genera is 20, and of the species 234. They are distributed between the Cape and Australia. South Africa has 13 genera and 156 species, Australia 10 genera and 77 species, only 3 of the genera and no species being common to both areas. A curious fact in geographical botany is the occur- rence of a single species, Leptocarpus chilensis, at Arique, on the Rio Negro, in Chili. The Australian species have been quite recently monographed by Mr. Bentham m the last volume of his ' Flora Australiensis,' published this year; and Dr. Masters differs but slightly from that standard work, which is quoted thoughout as " ined," though it has turned out to be the first published. The Meliacecc occupy half the volume, and are monographed by Casimir DeCandolle. Since the original account in the ' Pro- dromus' this order has been the subject of a fine memoir, in 1830, by A. de Jussieu ; and of a revision, so far as genera are concerned, in 18(32 by Hooker in the ' Genera Plantarum.' From this latter arrangement that here adopted does not greatly differ, but the genera Cipadessa, TurrmantJius and Azadirachta are kept uj), whilst Calodryinn is reduced to Quivisia, Epicharis to Bysoxylum, Milnea to Af/Iaia, and MoscJwxijlum to TrichiUa. Vavcca is transferred from the MeliccE to the TricliUece. The number of new sj)ecies is large, the standard of specific rank being considerably lower than 312 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. that followed in the British Colonial Floras, and the descriptions are very fall. The next volume is to be wholly occupied by Prof. Engler's monograph of AroidecB. Would it not conduce to lu'ompt publication if each Order were issued in a separate form with a separate index ? It would surely be more convenient than having Families so unconnected as the three here given in one volume. H. T. The * Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society' contains a Catalogue of the Flowering -Plants and Ferns of Dublin and Wicklow, by Messrs. D. Moore and A. G. More. TricoUocdri/on Barnard i is the name of a fossil fruit from the auriferous drifts of Victoria, described and figured by Baron von Mueller in the 'Mining Eeports' of the colony for March, 1878. It is i3erhaps referable to Sapindacem. In a paper in the ' Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria' Dr. J. Jamieson calls attention to a point in the respiration of plants not hitherto examined, namely, the trans- formations undergone by the oxygen. From various experiments and considerations he is led to believe (1) that the oxygen inhaled by i)lants, as well as by animals, enters first into some form of loose combination, as in the blood, whereby it is ozonized or rendered active, and is capable of being slowly given off to combine definitely with oxydizable substances; and (2) that plants contain a substance, other than chlorophyll, having some important points of analogy with the haemoglobin of animals and acting like it as an ozone-transferer. Othek New Books. — R. Hartig, 'Die Zersetzungserscheinungen des Holzes der Nadelholzbaume und der Eiche' (21 tab.). Berlin, Springer, 1878 (36 in.). — Regel, ' Tentamen Rosarum Mono- graphiiT3.' Schumacher, St. Petersburg, 1877 (2.s. 6(/.). — 0. Muller and G. Paest, ' Cryptogamen Flora : Lichens, Fungi, Hej)atica3.' Gera, Griesbach, 1877. — 0. F. Nyhan, ' Conspectus Flor« Europ^ae : I. Uannnculacca' — Pomacea;.' Orebro, 1878 [2s. Gd.). — M. C. Cooke and L. Quelet, ' Clavis Synpptica Hymenomycetum Europaeorum.' London, Hardwicke & Bogue, 1878 (7s. 6d.). — A. Magnin, ' Les Bacteries.' Paris, Savy, 1878. Articles in Journals. — August, 1878. Bot. ZeitwKj. — A. de Bary, ' On Apogamous Fenis, and the phenomena of Apogamy in general' (concluded). — J. Borodin, ' On the influence of Light in the development of Vaucheria sessilis' (t. 12). Flora. — W. Nylander, ' Symbolae qusedam ad lichenographiam Sahariensem.' — C. Kraus, ' Causes of the direction of growing shoots' (continued). — F. de Thuemen, 'Fungi austrq-africani.' — M. Gandoger, ' Rosee novae Galliae austro-orientalem colentes.' — Ablburg, ' Origin of (Hvhyu hiloba.' PKOCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 313 Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. — E. Eathay, * On Cladosporium Roesleri, and the ''black brand" of the Vine' (continued). — P. Ascherson, ' Fiu'ther remarks on the eastern forms of ScJdsmus, and on the plants of the Lesser Oasis' (Chara succincta, A. Br. ms., n. sp.). — C. J. von Klinggraff, ' Carex iKinicea and C. Jiirta, forma refracta.' — V. von Borbas, ' On Leucanthemum jjlatylejus.' — W. Vatke, ' Plantae a Hildebrandt in Africa trop. collect.; Leguminosm' (continued). — R. F. Solla, ' Summer Flora of the neighbourhood of Gorz.' — F. Antoine, 'Botany of Vienna Exhibition' (continued). Hedu'igia. — L. Rabenhorst, ' Some New Fungi and Algae.' Annales cles Sc. Nat. (ser. 6, vol. v., pt. 6). — G. Naudin, ' Eight years meteorological observations made in the experimental garden at Collioure.' — R. Moynier de Villepoix, ' Researches into the secretary canals of Umbelliferous fruits' (tt. 16, 17). (ser. 6, vol. vi., pts. 1 & 2). — C. Flaliault, ' Researches in the terminal growth of the roots of Phanerogams' (tt. 1-8). Magyar Novengtani Lapok. — L. Haynald, Obituary notice of Parlatore. ptocteOtnp of Soctettes. British Association for the Advancement of- Science, Dublin, 1878. Section D. Biology. Department of Zoology and Botany. — August 19th. — Sh* J. D. Hooker, Vice-President, in the chair. — " On the supposed Radiolarians and DiatonHice(B of the Coal Measures," by Prof. W. C. Williamson. The author called attention to the Traquana of Mr. Carruthers, found in the lower coal measures of Lancashu-e and Yorkshire, which small spherical objects that observer believed to be radiolarians like those still living in existing seas. The author showed that the I'adiating projections with which these spheres are surrounded were not silicious spines like those of radiolarians, but extensions of a continuous membrane which enclosed the entire organism, and which, therefore, could not have the spicular nature attributed to them. He then demonstrated that within this external membrane is a second inner one, which latter is fitted with numerous small vegetable cells like those shown to exist m the interior of fossil spores and reproductive crj^ptogamous capsules found in the same beds as those which furnish the Traquarm. These conditions are so different from those existing in any known recent species of radiolarian as to lead Prof. William- son to reject the idea of their radiolarian character. Their close organic resemblance to some obviously vegetable conceptacles found in the same coal measures suggest that the Traquarm are also vegetable structures. The mountain limestone deposits of some British localities contain a vast multitude of minute calcareous organisms which Mr. SoUas and other observers regarded as radio- 314 PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. larians. Tliese structures, however, seem to exhibit no satisfactory evidence of behig so. In the first i^lace, these organisms are now calcareous instead of sihcious. It has been suggested that their sihcious elements were removed and replaced by carbonate of lime, but this appears to be most improbable. Prof. Eoscoe and Prof. Schorlemmer agree in stating that they would require over- whelming evidence before they would be prepared to accept such an explanation of the present condition of these objects, or of the fact of the substitution of carbonate of lime for silica, that such an explanation renders necessary. Count Castracane has published an account of a process by which he reduced numerous specimens of coals to very minute quantities of coal-ash, and has stated that he found in tliese ashes numerous marine and freshwater DiatomacecB. Prof. Eoscoe kindly allowed one of the ablest assistants in his laboratory at Owen's College to pre^^are analyses of a number of coals according to Count Castracane's method. The residual ashes of these preparations have been examined microscopically by Prof. Williamson, and in no one of them can a trace of a diatom be found. Beyond stating the fact, he is wholly unable to account for the discrejDancy between his results and those of the Italian observer. • So far as his present observations go, he finds himself compelled to conclude that we have no proof of the existence of radiolarians or of DiatomacccE in the British carboniferous rocks. — " On the Association of an Inconspicuous Corolla with Protero- gynous Dichogamy in Insect-fertilized Flowers," by Alex. S. Wilson, M.A., B.Sc. The majority of conspicuously-coloured flowers whose cross-fertilization depends on their being easily seen by insects, are proterandrous. Such plants have their flowers placed in close inflorescences, as, for example, in Erica, Calhina, Vacci)iium , Digitalis, Linaria, Gladiolus, &c., and occasionally the flowers are secund, or placed on one side of the axis, thus becoming more conspicuous. In the indefinite mode of inflorescence the older flowers are placed at the lower part of the flowering axis ; hence in the commonest form of inflorescence with proterandrous flowers, the lower flowers are in the second or female stage at the time when those in the upper part are in the first or male stage. In proterogynous dichogamy with indefinite inflorescence, the older flowers are in the second or male stage when the upper and younger flowers are in the female stage. In Scrophularia nodosa we have a plant in which proterogynous dichogamy is associated with an inconspicuous corolla. The stigma after fertilization is removed out of the pathway to the nectar by the bending back of the style on the outside of the corolla, while the stamens straighten out to occupy the place formerly held by the stigma. The corolla is small and obscurely coloured, being greenish, tipped with brown. The inflorescence is lax, and the flowers scattered all round the axis. The odour of the flowers and the presence of a nectariferous gland shows that the plant is fertilized by insects, and not by the wind. Among such incon- spicuously-coloured flowers, proterogynous dichogamy seems to prevail, just as proterandiy is characteristic of brightly- coloured flowers. Hitherto it has not been shown how an entomophilous PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 315 plant could advantageously possess a small uncoloured corolla, and be proterogynous. Watching the mode in which wasps visited the Scrophularia nodosa afforded the solution of the problem. The first flower visited by the wasp w^as the top one, and it passed irregularly downwards from flower to flower, and left the inflorescence by the lowest flower. Bees, when collecting honey, do the reverse, visiting the lowest flower first, and proceeding from flower to flower in regular succession from below upwards, leaving by the top flower. The order in which the flowers are visited is therefore of the greatest importance. In Gladiolus, for example, the bee begins at the lowest flower, and will deposit any pollen brought by it from a neigh- bouring spike, and as it passes upwards it will get from the upper flowers a fresh supply of pollen to apply to the lower flowers of another spike. In Scrophularia nodosa wasps, which are less highly speciahzed as honey collectors, chiefly visit the flowers and proceed from above downwards, leaving the inflorescence with pollen from the lower flowers to apply it to the stigma of the proterogynous upper flow^ers. Wasps differ from bees m one important point, ciz., that while bees are purely vegetable feeders, wasjDs add to a vegetable diet by x^i"e}^ng largely on insects smaller than themselves. Throughout the animal kingdom Carnivora are endowed with keener powers of vision and scent than vegetable- feeding creatures. That keenness of vision which enables a wasp to descry its prey at a distance, aided by its acute sense of smell, in aU probability also enables it to discover these obscure flowers, without the guidance afforded by a coloured corolla, the materials that would be required for its production being employed more economically by the plant, just as in cleistogamic flowers. The wasp also gains an advantage, as it has a better chance of finding honey in these obscure flowers on account of then- being easily overlooked by insects less highly endowed as regards X30wers of scent and vision. — " Notes on Dimorphic Plants," by A. S. Wilson. The author pomted out that Erythrcea Centaurium was probably dimoi-phic, as it exhibited heterostyly, and had two kinds of pollen- grains. Silene acaulis was shown to have three kinds of flowers, male, female, and hermaphrodite, thus resembling S. injiata, which Axel has shown to be trioeciously polygamous. — " Some Mechanical Arrangements subserving Cross-fertilization of Plants by Insects," by A. S. Wilson. The plants considered were Vinca miyior, Pinguicula vulgaris, and the foxglove, and the author described the various structural peculiarities in the different flowers. — " On the Amounts of Sugar contained in the Nectar of various Flowers," by A. S. Wilson. Nectar is intended to provide an inducement to cause insects to visit the flowers. These insects confer great benefit on the flowers by assming their cross-fertilization, bringing pollen from other plants and depositing it on their stigmas. The result of this is that the plant is enabled to produce seeds of much greater vigour than it otherwise would. The saccharine fluid is usually contained in the most secluded part of the flower, in order that it may be protected from rain, for, owing to the solubihty and the diffusibility of sugar, were it not so protected it would speedily be 31G PltOCEEDIXGS OP^ SOCIETIES. traiisfoiTed to parts of the plant where it could be obtaiued by the insects without their serving the plant in the way of cross-fertiH- zation. The colour, odour, and marking of flowers enable insects to find the nectar more easily. The importance of these insects will be apparent from the smallness of the amounts of sugar found in the flowers experimented on by Mr. Wilson. Flowers of fuchsia yielded a total of 7*59 mmg. of sugar — 1-69 of this was fruit-sugar, and 5-9 apparently cane-sugar. Of red clover each head gave a total of 7*93 mmg., fruit 5*95, apparent cane-sugar 1-98. On each head of clover there are nearly sixty distinct florets. Calculating from these results, there was the astonishing industry of the bee brought out in an extraordinary manner, for in order to obtain the kilo of sugar 7,500,000 distinct flowers must be sucked. As honey contained roughly about 75 per cent, of sugar, a bee has then to make two and a half millions of visits in order to collect a pound of honey. It was rather a curious fact that nectar should contain cane-sugar, seeing that honey never did ; indeed were a vendor to sell honey containing cane-sugar he would probably be prosecuted under the Adulteration Act. A change must therefore take place while the sugar is in the bee's possession — possibly through the action of the juices with which it comes in contact while in the honey-bag. As nectar is acid in its reaction it is, however, possible that the process of inversion may take place spontaneously. [The chemical portion of this paper was also communicated in more detail to Section B on August 15tli.] — "On the Stipules of Sperr/ularia marina,'' by Prof. Alex. Dickson. As is well known, certain genera of Caryo- phijllacea, of which Sjjergularia is one, are distinguished by the presence of stipulary api^endages. On examining lately the stipules of Spergularia marina, I was struck with a peculiarity j)resented by them, which, if observed at all by descrii)tive botanists, has not received the attention it deserves on account of its remarkable character. The stipules are free from the petioles and wholly cellular m structure. From connation of those of opposite leaves they form iiiterpetiolar stipules with more or less regularly though slightl}' bifid extremities. Lastly (and this is the important point), these stipules are united to each other round the backs of the petioles, so that a sheath is formed completely sarrounding the axis and the two leaf-bases. This connation of stipules round the backs of the petioles is very interesting as being a rare pheno- menon. Cases are not uncommon where the two stipules are connate on the inner side of the leaf-base, constituting the so-called "axillary stipule," (\(j., Votamogeton lucens, &c., or on the opi30site side of the axis from the leaf, e.g., Ficus dastica, Aatragalus aljiina, &c., constituting the " oi)positifoliar" stipule; but the only reference to connation behind the leaf-base I can find is in the case of certain Astragali, by St. Hilaii'e, in his ' Morphologie.' In those species of Antragalus which I have examined I have not seen any one m which the stipules are actualty connate in this way; but in some, e.g., A. alojicruroidcs, the bases of the stixniles extend round the back till they meet — a condition just short of connation. In Spergularia, as we have seen, we have the interesting combination of the inter- PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. 317 petiolar connatiou with connation round the back of the leaf. In ' Enghsh Botany ' I observe that the condition is fairly enough rexDresented by the artist, but, as I have already indicated, the morj)hological peculiarity does not seem to have impressed itself on the botanical mind. Dr. Bayley Balfour remarked that a good deal of confusion existed as to the application of the term " stipule," and showed that in some cases it was applied to structures of very different appearance, and perhaps even of varying morx^hological significance. — "On the Inflorescence of Senehiera didyma,'" by Prof. Alexander Dickson. When at Plymouth last August during the meeting of the British Association, I took the opportunity of examining Senehiera didijma, a weed which grows in great abundance on road-sides and waste places about the town, and I was much struck with a remarkable peculiarity in connection with its inflorescence. The inflorescence is, like that of the mass of cruciferous jDlants, racemose. The racemes are *' oppositifoliar," and at first sight the arrangement seems to be analogous to that of the oppositifoliar inflorescences of Vitis or of Alchemilla arvensis, where the mflo- rescence is really termmal, but thrown to the side by preponderant development of a "usurping shoot," the axillary bud of the last leaf produced by the primary axis before ending in the inflorescence. This view seems further supported by the fact that of all the foliage leaves, that ox)posite the raceme is the only one apparently destitute of an axillary bud, which on this supposition would be represented by the "usurping shoot." If, however, the plant is more closely examined, a very remarkable condition is disclosed — one, indeed, which offers a morphological problem of considerable difficulty, and which, probably, can be effectually solved only by developmental study. The peculiarity consists in the constant occurrence of a solitary flower springing somewhere from the internode below the raceme either about liaK way down towards, or almost close to the level of the leaf below. So far as my observations go, the solitary flower is never quite as low as the level of the lower leaf. It might be supposed that fi-om almost immediately above the second last leaf of the main axis, the bases of the terminal raceme of the "usurping shoot" and of the axillant leaf of the shoot had all become fused together. Now, although cases are known on the one hand, of adhesion between the base of a terminal flower and that of the usurping axis (e.g., Helianthemum vuhjare ; Payer), and, on the other hand, between the base of an axillant leaf and that of the usurping shoot in its axil [e.g., Sedum sp.; Payer), we do not know of connation of all three together. It is possible, but I think improbaj^le. The view which, after careful consideration, occurs to me as most fuUy satisfying the conditions of this remarkable case, may be stated briefly in categorical form as foUows : — 1. The racemose inflorescence is terminal and properly begins just above the level of the second last leaf. It would thus include the afore- said solitary flower. 2. The raceme after producing one ebracteate flower, produces at its second node. a foliage leaf from whose axil the "usm-ping shoot" springs. By such an exjilanation we can dispense with any cumbrous adhesion hypothesis such as I have yiy PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIETIES. indicated above. The peculiarity is that the main axis does not, per salt II IK, pass from the coudition of a leafy axis to that of an axis of indorescence, but begins by producing one flower and then developing a foliage -leaf beyond which the series of flowers is uninterrupted. The "usurping shoot," as above indicated, repre- sents the axillary bud of the foliage-leaf by which the raceme is interrupted. — "On the 6-celled Glands of Cephalotus and their similarity to the Glands oiSarracenia purpurea^" by Prof. A.Dickson. The peculiar 6-celled glands found on the external surface of the pitcher and both surfaces of its lid and of the leaf in Cephalotus are very nearly identical with those on both surfaces of the pitcher of S. purpurea, originally described by Vogl. Hence the author sug- gested an afiinity not hitherto suspected. — " Notes on Xaiadacea;," by I. B. Balfour. [This paper will be found in extenso at p. 290.] Dr. A. Dickson exhibited specimens of Isoetes echinospora, which he had collected on the muddy bottom of Loch Callater, Aberdeenshire, growing with Putamoi/eton in about two feet of water, remarkable for their slender and tapering leaves, which curve outwards. — Dr. D. Moore exhibited specimens of an Isoetes from Lough Bray, Co. Wicklow, with very long slender leaves. It was suggested by Prof. Suringar and Prof. McNab that it might x^rove to be 1. Malinrerniana, Ces. &De Not. of Northltaly. [Subsequent examina- tion of this plant has shown that this is not the case. The plant has long been known in Lough Bray, and considered to be a form of Isoetes with very long leaves. (See A. G. More in ' Eecent Addi- tions to Flora of L-eland.') Dr. Moore now considers the plant identical with the S. European I. setacea,''Del.] — Dr. I. B. Balfour showed Salix Sadleri and Carex frigida, discovered m 1874 in Corrie Chandler, Aberdeenshke, by Mr. Sadler, and not again seen till the present year. — Mr. Britten, on behalf of Mr. J. H. A. Jenner, showed specimens of llumex maximus, Schreb., from a new locality in East Sussex, which presented the characters of the plant in a very marked degree. [See p. 305.] — Mr. Price, of Chester, sent for exhibition leaves of Cardamine pratensis producing numerous gemmie. LiNNEAN Society of London. June 20th, 1878. — J. G. Allman, F.K.S., President, in the chair. — William Cattell, Esq., was elected a Fellow of the Society. G. Busk, Esq., W. Carruthcrs, Esq., Lieut. -Col. Grant, and Dr. J. Gwyn Jefl'reys, were nominated Vice-Presidents. — Mr. J. R. Jackson exhibited three Gourds (fruits of Lca/enaria, probably L. vuhjaris) from Pekin. One of these had been used as a water- bottle, and evidently had been made to assume its handsome form by tying with cords while in a growing state. The other two were said to have been inserted into moulds while growing, and to have thus acquired their ornamental pattern, which was as sharp as if carved. — The following papers were read : — 'On two kinds of Dimorphism in the Iiubiacea/ This group is well known to be largely dimorphic, the dimorphism consisting in mere variations PilOCEEDINGS OF SOClisTIES. 319 in the length of the style and stamens. The two kmds of dimorphism now recorded by the author are as follows : — • 1. Where the point of insertion of the stamens is altered, being in (a) high above the middle of the corolla -tube, in (b) at the very base of the corolla-tube, that is subepigynous instead of epicorolline. 2. Where there are two kinds of fruit, viz., (a) a large fruit corre- sponding to a sessile flower, and (h) a small fruit corresponding to a pedunculated flower. As an example of that under 1, Adenosacme lom/ifolia, a shrub common in Sikkim and Khasia, is given ; and of 2, liandia idiginosa, a small tree common in the swamps of Bengal. Most botanists have referred examples of the same species to different genera ; hence some caution will hereafter be necessary ni the discrimination and axjportioning of characters to the species and genera of the PachiacecB. — ' The StapelicB of Thunberg's Herbarium,' by N. E. Brown. Through the courtesy of Dr. Th. Fries, of the Upsala University, the authorities at Kew have had the advantage of the loan of portions of Thunberg's herbarium, and Mr. Brown has examined the plants placed under the genus Stapelia by Thunberg. The species are eleven in number, of which only five belong to the genus as now understood. The other six belong to five different genera, two of which are now characterized for the first time, viz., Trichocaulon and Diplocijatha. Mr. Brown likewise gives descriptions of the curious plants Sarcocodon speciosum, from Somali-land, and Huer- niopsis decipiens, from South Africa. The French Association foji the Advancement of the Sciences met at Paris during the week commencing August 23rd. The Botanical Section was presided over by Prof. Baillon, Prof, de Lanessan being Secretary. The following papers were read : — M. Merget, ' On the part played by the stomata in the phenomena of inhalation and exhalation ' ; Dutailly, ' On intramedullary forma- tions in the Plantaginece ' ; Abbe Eoucliy, ' On the variability of species under the influence of culture ' ; Baillon, ' On the develop- ment of the ovular integuments'; Miquel, 'On the germs in the atmosphere' ; De Seynes, ' On the couidial apparatus of Pohjporus sidphureus' ; E. Mer, * Some examples to illustrate antagonism of the influences exercised by heredity and surroundings ' ; Millardet, 'Alterations produced by the I^hylloxcm on the roots of the Vine ' ; De Lanessan, ' Organogeny of the inflorescence and female flower of the Hop'; E. Tison, 'Structure of the bark of Ahtonia con- stricta' ; Baillon, 'On Xcgria' ; Dutailly, 'Some peculiarities of structure in Prassica'; E. Tison, 'Anatomical conditions of the dehiscence of the capsule in Henbane' ; C. Blondeau, 'On respi- ration and heat in plants'; E. Mussat, 'On some plants of the group of Inulem' ; Baillon, 'On the androecium of Cucurhitaceo)'; D. Corenwinder, ' On the influence of the leaves in the production of sugar in the Beet ' ; Sirodot, ' On the development of Batracho- spermum'; Poisson, 'On the colouration of the seeds of Maize' ; 320 BOTANICAL NEWS. Mer, ' On the appearance of starch and sugar in leaves' ; Cornu, ' On an epidemic disease of insects produced by a Fungus' ; Bail- Ion, « On the genus Dedca' ; Cornu, ' On the alternate generation of Uredinem' ; Nylander, ' On the algo-Kchen theory' ; G. Dutailly, * On vessels considered as playing, in certain cases, the part of secretary canals' De Lanessan, ' Besearches in the histogeny of secondary axes.' Botantcal Nctos. The death is recorded, on May 31st, of Mr. A. Thozet, F.L.S., of Eockhampton, Queensland, at the age of fifty-two, well known as one of the most enthusiastic botanists of Australia. Besides the collection of plants for the herbarium, he had brought together in the grounds of his estate, called Muellerville, a very fine collection of tropical and subtropical species, both native and introduced. Mr. Thozet was by birth a Frenchman, but had lived for eighteen or nineteen years in the colony. His friend, Baron von Mueller, dedicated to him an Asclepiadeous genus allied to Hoi/a, discovered by Mr. Thozet near Kockhampton, Thozetia racemosa ; and he is also commemorated by several species of other genera. We also notice the death of S. S. Olney, of Providence, Khode Island, U.S.A., who for many years had closely studied the CyperacecB, especially the species of Carex. It is stated that he has left a large (indefinite) sum to Profs. Asa Gray and W. H. Canby, in trust, to be applied to the study, advancement and progress of Botany in the state of Khode Island. We believe that Mr. Olney published nothing upon botany ; but Prof. Gray has preserved his name in a si3ccies of Scirpm, named after him. On July 25tli died Prof. Christian Edward Langethal, of Jena, author of several botanico-agricultural works. Messrs. Joshua and Holmes propose, if a sufiicient number of subscribers can be found, to issue a series of microscopical slides, illustrating the principal Families, genera and subgenera of Lichens ; and, if the enterprise meet with success, to follow this by a series of siiecimens of Lichens of which no figures have been published. The specimens will be as tyj)ical as can be x)rocured, and will consist of sections of the apothecia, showing all the various parts ; they will be very useful to those commencing the study of cryptogamic botany. For further particulars apx^ly to Mr. Joshua, Cirencester; or Mr. Holmes, 30, Arthur lioad, Holloway, N. Dr. Nyman requests us to state that the first part of his " Conspectus Florae Em-opece" can be obtained by botanists direct from the author, Brunkeborg's Torg, 3, Stockholm, at 'Is. (ji Mmtem Bros irtqj. THE *' PRO-EMBKYO" OF CHARA. 355 remarkable plant will bear the name of my colleague, A.' G. More, Esq., who first called attention to it, and who has con- tributed in so many instances to the furtherance of British botany. Desceiption of Tab. 199. — Isoetes Morei, D. Moore, from specimens collected at Lough Bray, Ireland. 1. A complete plant. 2. Vertical section of the corra. 3. Transverse section of the same. 4, Lower portion of a leaf, showing macrosporangium, veil and lingula. 5. Transverse section of micro- sporangium. 6. Transverse section of leaf. 7. Macrospores. [N.B. — In section No. 4 the lingula is shewn too narrow at hase, with margins more entire than they usually are.] THE ''PKO-EMBKYO" OF CHARA: AN ESSAY IN MORPHOLOGY. By Sydney H. Vines, B.A., B.Sc, F.L.S., Fellow and Lecturer of Christ's College, Cambridge. It is to the researches of Pringsheim"^ that we are indebted for our knowledge of the fact that the fertilised oosphere of Chara does not immediately give rise, as had been stated by previous observers, to the sexual plant, but that a comparatively inconspicuous "pro-embryo" (Vorkeim) is developed from it, which presents no differentiation of stem and leaf, from one of the cells of which the axis of the sexual differentiated j)lant is formed as a lateral out- growth. The details of the development of the " pro-embryo " have been recently described by De Bary.f From his description and figures it appears that the first stage in its development con- sists in the disappearance of the granules of starch and fatty matter from the protoplasm occupying the apex (free end) of the cell, and in the formation of a wall at right angles to its long axis as to divide it into two unequal cells — a small apical cell filled with hyaline protojDlasm, and a much larger basal cell, the protoplasm of which is full of granules. The basal cell appears to act merely as a depository for nutrient materials to be used in the growth of the " pro-embryo," which is formed from the small apical cell in the following manner : — It is divided into two equal parts by the formation of a wall perpendicular to the first, lying therefore in the plane of the long axis of the oospore, t Each of the two cells thus formed grows out into a multicellular filament, the one being the " ]3ro- embryo," the other the " primary root." It is not necessary to follow the succession of cell-divisions whichlead to the formation of these structm-es, nor is it essential to reproduce here Pringsheim's account of the development of the axis of the sexual plant from one of the cells of the " ^Dro-embryo." What has been said above will be found sufficient to render intel- ligible the following discussion, which has for its object the elucidation of the morphological significance of the " pro-embryo." * ' Jahrb. fiir wiss. Bot.' Bd. iii. 1864, p. 294. + • Bot. Zeitg.' 1875, p. 877 (trans, in Journ. Bot., 1875, p. 298) ; also « Nordstedt, and Wahlstedt, Flora,' 1875. + Oospore = fertilised oosphere (central cell, gynosphere, ovum). 356 THE "pro-embryo" of chara. The interpretation given by Pringsheim" of the facts discovered by him is to this effect : — He considers that the structure which springs from the oospore of Chara, and to which he gives the name of " pro-embryo " (Vorkeim), is the exact morphological equivalent of the protonema which is developed from the spore of a Moss, and he infers from the existence in these plants of leafless structures intervening between the spore and the leafy plant, that the Charace(T and the Muscinem are closely allied. This close relation- ship is, he believes, placed beyond doubt by the fact that Mosses alone of all plants possess organs which are analogous to the '* pro- embryonic branches " (Zweigvorkeime) of Chara. The researches of Schimpert shew that " rhizoid prothallia" occiu- on the stem and leaves of many Mosses. In proceeding to inquire into the adequacy of this interpretation, it may be at once admitted that the Characea resemble the Muscinea;, in many points. Pringsheim does not fail to note in his above-mentioned work the similarity in structure and development existing between the nucule of Chara and the archegonium of a Moss. It is usual at the present time I to place the Characea in the class Carpospore(B, and to speak of the nucule as a carpogonium. The soundness of such a classification becomes questionable when it is remembered that both in structure and development, as well as in the changes which it undergoes in consequence of fertilisation, the nucule of Chara differs absolutely from a typical carpogonium. The central cell (oosphere) of the nucule is surrounded fi'om the first by a multicellular investment, and consequently that formation of a cystocarp around the oos^jhere after its fertilisation, which is so characteristic of the Carposporecr., does not take place in the Characece. It is i^robably more correct to speak of the nucule of the CharacecB as being an archegonium. In a recent paper upon the alternation of generations among the Thallophytes, § Pringsheim groups the Characea with the Fucacea and the Conjiif/ata;, as being plants which do not present that dimorphism of the organs of fructification which is essential to the occurrence of alternation of generations. In making this state- ment he becomes unconsciously illogical. If, as he insists in his first paper, the " jiro-embryo " of Chara be homologous with the protonema of a Moss, and if, as he asserts in his second paper, there be no stage m the life-history of Chara w^hich corresponds to to the asexual generation (sporophore ||) of the Moss, it must be admitted that the product of a fertilised oosphere is morpho- logically equivalent to the product of a germinating spore ; that, for instance, the sporogonium of a Moss is equivalent to its pro- * Loc. cit. p. 318, quoting from ' Monatsber, d. Berl. Akad.', 18U2. } ' Recherches anat. et morpbol. sur les Mousses.' Strasbourg, 1818, pp. 13, 15, 10. J ' Sachs, Lehrbucb,' 4te Auflage, 1874. § ' Jahrb. I'lir wiss. Bot.', Bd. xi. 1877, p. 32. II Thiselton Dyer has suggested the word " oophore " as a general expression for the sexual and " sporophore " for the asexual generation of plants. These terras are used in this sense throughout this paper. THE '* pro-embryo" OF CHARA. 357 tonema — a result which is obviously incorrect. An attempt might be made to escai)e from this dilemma by surrendering the sup- posed homology of the " pro -embryo " with a protonema, main- taining, however, the assertion that no alternation of generations presents itself in the life-history of Chara ; but this would only lead to further difficulties. Such a view would at once isolate Chara from all other hving organisms as being an individual the fertilised "ovum" of which produces an embryo quite unHke its parent, from which the sexual individual is subsequently formed by a process of budding. The life-history of Chara can be satis- factorily accounted for only on the assumption that an alternation of generations occurs in it. It is admitted by those who agree in placing the Characea among the CarposporecB that an alternation of generations does exist in the life-history of Chara, and the following is a brief account of the supposed mode of its occurrences. To make it quite clear a comparison may be instituted between Chara and a typically car- posporous j)lant such as Coleochate. As the result of fertilisation, the oosphere of Coleochxte undergoes successive divisions, which give rise to a number of similar cells. This mass of cells, invested by the walls of the mother-cell, is the sporophore of Coleochate, for, at a later period, these cells become isolated ; each of them is in fact a sj)ore (carpospore), and from each of them a zoospore is emitted, fi'om which the oox3hore is developed. In Chara the fertilised oosphere does not give rise even to so simple a spore- producmg apparatus as that of ColeochcBte. It remains unicellular ; it is, in fact, converted dnectly into a single carpospore, and this is all that rej)resents the sporophore in the life-history of Chara. It is only when this si3ore is about to germinate that it becomes multicellular by the formation of cell-waUs within it in the manner described by De Bary. This comparison may be conveniently expressed in the following tabular form : — Oophore. Sporophore. Coleochaete ... Chara Moss Plant. Plant. Plant. Oospore. Carpospore. Sporogonium. , This view certainly harmonises with Pringsheim's theory of the homology of the " pro-embryo " with a protonema, but it presents obvious difficulties. It is not easy to realise that the so-called carpospore of Chara is the morphological equivalent of the whole oospore of Coleochmtc, and therefore also of so complex a structure as the sporogonium of a Moss, and these difficulties are very much increased by Pringsheim's recent paper above referred to. In it he satisfactorily demonstrates that the spore of a Moss or of a Fern, for instance, is not the final stage of the s^Dorophore, but that it is the first stage of the oophore. This being the case, the table given above is incomplete, all mention of the spore (except in the case of Chara) being omitted. In its complete form it is as follows : — 858 THE " PRO-EMBRYO OF CHARA. Oopliore. Sporophore. Oospore. Carpospore. Sporogoniuin. Coleochsete ... Chara Moss Carpospore. Proembryo. Plant. Spore. Protonema. Plant. This statement of the case makes it evident at a glance that the hyi^othesis of the dii-ect conversion of the oosphere of Chara by- fertilisation into a single carpospore results in a paradox. It compels us to regard the carpospore of Chara as being not only the sporophore but also the first stage of the oophore of the plant ; or, in other words, to consider the carpospore of Chara as being the morphological equivalent of the oospore of Coleochcete and of the sporogonium of a Moss, and, at the same time, of a single spore of either of these plants, a view which is quite untenable. Moreover, such a direct conversion of an oosphere into a single spore is quite unparalleled among plants which exhibit an alter- nation of generations. In all such plants the result of the develop- ment of the fertilised oosphere is the production of numerous spores. Further, the mode of " germination " of this " carpospore " of Chara is quite different fi-om that of the spores of other plants. Wheu a l; :ore germinates it usually protrudes a germinal filament (Keimschlauch) from any portion of its surface, but in Chara the protrusion of the filament is confined to a definite spot, and its formation is preceded by certain well-defined and apparently constant cell-divisions. It appears, therefore, that this view of the alternation of generations in Chara is unsatisfactory, for it is based upon an unwarrantable assumption, and it fails to explain all the phenomena of the life-history of the plant. An attempt may now be made to give an interpretation of these phenomena which shaU have a more secm-e foundation, and which shall interpret them in a more satisfactory manner. The first ceU-divisions which take place in the fertilised oos^Dhere of Chara are not unlike those which take place in that of ColeochMe, but the final result is diflercnt in the two cases ; in ColeochcBte the cells formed fall apart, but in Cliara they remain connected and certain of them give rise to the " pro-embryo " and to the " primary root." The processes of growth exhibited by the "germinating carpospore" of ( hara corresj)ond much more nearly to those which accompany the development of an embryo from a fertilised oosphere than to those which occiu- in a germinating spore. It is interesting to compare, from this point of view, the embryology of Chara with that of the Hepatka. In Chara, the first division of the oosphere takes place, as we have seen, in a plane at right angles to the long axis of the archegonium, and this is the case also among the higher Hepatica (Jungermannieaa) ; but this difference exists, that in Chara two unequal cells are formed, whereas the two cells of the Hepatica are equal in size. The more superficial of the two cells in the Hepaticm — the one, that is, which immediately underlines the neck of the archegonium — undergoes numerous divisions, by means PRO-EMBKYO OF CHARA. 359 of which the tissue of the future sporogonium is formed, and the more deeply-placed cell gives rise to the tissue of the seta and foot (embryo- phore). In Biccia, however, the whole oosphere is devoted to the for- mation of the sporogonium. In Chara, the more superficial of the two cells gives rise to the " pro-embryo " by repeated divisions, whereas it appears that the deeply-placed larger cell undergoes no change. Since their mode of origin is the same, it is reasonable to suggest that the " pro-embryo " of Chara is the homologue of the sx)orogonium of the HejKitica, and that the basal cell of the former is the homologue of the seta and foot of the latter, — that the " pro-embryo " and the basal cell together are equivalent to the sporogonium with its seta and foot. It must not be forgotten, however, that in Chara the " primary root " is derived from the apical cell as well as the *' pro-embryo." From the researches of Nordstedt and Wahlstedt "^^ it appears that this development of a "primary-root" is not absolutely constant, and that when it does not take place the whole of the apical cell gives origin to the "pro-embryo." This fact affords some ground for regarding this root not as a " primary " root, in the strict sense of the term, but rather as an adventitious root. As I have endeavoured to establish elsewhere,! a " ])Yiia?ii'j root " is an organ developed from that segment of the oosphere which is diagonally opposite to that one in which the apex of the stem is formed. Of this the Ferns and EquisetacerE and also the Phanerogams offer good examples. When, as in Chara, the first root is formed from that half of the oosphere which gives rise also to the stem, it must be regarded as being adventitious. Of this Selaginella and the ConifercB afford examples. It may be objected that the inequahty of the two cells in Chara destroys the homology which is here suggested, but this objection has not much weight. It is not denied that the sporogonium of Pdccia is homologous with the sporogonium, seta, and foot of one of the other HejMticte, because in Fdccia the sporogonium is formed from the whole instead of fi'om half of the oosphere, and therefore the homology of the "pro-embryo" of Chara with the sporogonium of one of the Hepatica, cannot be denied on the ground that it is formed from a small part of an oosphere the greater part of which is devoted to the formation of a foot. On this view the " pro -embryo," or rather the true " embryo " of Chara must be regarded as the sporophore of the plant. The following table will illustrate this view in all its consequences : — Oojpho7'e. Sjporojphore. Oospore. Embiyo. Sporogonium. Coleochaete ... Chara Carpospore. Spore. Plant. Plant. Plant. Moss Protonema. * Loc. cit. t On the Homologies of the Suspen; January, 1878. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci, 860 THE "PRO-EMBKYO" OF CHARA. A very obvious objection is at once suggested by this table, viz., that if it be correct the sporophore of Chara is represented by an organ which has never been known to produce spores. It must not be forgotten, however, that the transition from the sporophore to the oophore in plants which present a well-marked alternation of generations is not necessarily effected by means of spores. The recent researches of Pringsheim '•' and of Stahl f have shewn that the seta and the sporogonium {i.e. the sporophore) of |a Moss may, under certain conditions, give rise to a protonema upon which the moss-plant (oophore) is subsequently developed as a lateral out- growth. From the observations of Miiller | we know that the protonema of a Moss is merely the simplest possible form of its leaf-bearing stem. These facts warrant the assertion that a direct transition from the sporophore to the oophore can be effected in Mosses without the intervention of spores. It is not so para- doxical, therefore, as it api3ears to be at first sight, to apply the term " sporophore " to an organ which does not actually produce spores. It may be inferred that the condition which is accidental in Mosses is permanent in Chara, in which i^lant the sporo^Dhore remains rudimentary, producing no spores, but giving rise to the oophore by lateral budding from one of its cells. The vegetative reproduction by means of the " pro-embryonic branches " — or, as should now be said, " embryonic branches " — which has been described in detail by Pringsheim, and which is of common occurence in Chara, affords some indirect but valuable support to the views here advanced. These embryonic branches spring from the nodes of the stem, and closely resemble the embryo in theii- structure. Like the embryo, an embryonic branch gives origin to a sexual plant by a process of budding from one of its cells which hes behind its apical cell. Expressing these facts in general terms this process may be described as the development of numerous si)orophores (embryonic branches) by budding from the oophore (C7?a;-a-plant), as an instance, that is, of a transition from an oophore to a sporophore without the intervention of sexual reproductive organs (Apogamy, Be Banj). Other instances of this occur among Ferns. It has been found § that the prothaUus (oophore) of certain Ferns [Aspidium filLv-inas cristatiun, Aspidium falcatuni, Pteris creticd) gives rise to the fern-plant (sporophore) by a process of budding without the development of any sexual reproductive organs, and that this is the only means by which these Ferns are reproduced. It appears from the foregoing facts and deductions (1) that a well-marked alternation of generations occurs in the life-history of Chara, and (2) that the C7««rrt-plant with its reproductive organs is * ' Jahrb. fiir wiss. Bot.' Bd. xi. 1877, p. 1. + ' Bot. Zeitg.' 1876. \ ' Die Sporenvorkeime etc., der Laubmoose.' * Arb. d. bot. Inst, in Wiirz- burgh,' Bd. I., Heft.iv., 1874. § Farlow, on asexual growth from the prothaUus of Pteris cretica. ' Quart. Journ. Mic. Sci.', vol. xiv., 1874. De Bary ; Ueber apogame Fame, .fee. ' Bot. Zeitg.', 1878. THE "pro-embryo" OF CHARA. 361 the oopliore, the sporophore being represented by the embryo, i.e., the product of the develoiDment of the central- cell of the archego- nium. In order to indicate the fact that no spores are ever pro- duced, so far as is at present known, by the sporophore of Chara, we may speak of this ^Dlant as being " aiDosporous," using a word which is symmetrical with the term ** apogamous," apiDlied by De Bary to those Ferns in whose life-history no process of sexual reproduction occurs. If this interpretation of the facts in the life -history of Chara be in any measure a correct one, it will necessarily have an important bearing upon the question of the systematic j)osition of the CharacecB. This question has been recently discussed in these pages by Bennett'" and by Caruel.f The former, accepting the prevailing account of the hfe-history of Chara, and perceiving the many features which the Characem and the 2IuscinecB possess in common, suggests that the Characem may be Mosses, rendered abnormal by their aquatic habit, in which the formation of the non-sexual genere^tion (sporophore) is altogether suj)iDressed. There is nothing in the views advanced in this paper to contradict the existence of a relationship between the Characem and the Muscinea ; on the contrary, there is much to estabhsh it. It is true that the "pro-embryo" of Chara cannot any longer be regarded as the homologue of the protonema of a Moss, but, on the other hand, it is here contended that the embryo is the homologue of the sporogonium of a Moss ; so that although these views destroy one link in the chain of analogies and homologies which connects the Characece and the MuscinecB, they replace it by a stronger one. I quite agree with Bennett's conclusion, on account of the facts detailed in the earher part of this paper, that it is incorrect to place the Charace(B among the CarposporecB, for they have stronger affinities with the Mosses. Still it must not be overlooked that the Characece do possess certain featui-es in common with some of the CarposporecB. such as a very simple histological composition and their peculiar cortica- tion. And further, although, as Bennett states and as I have ah'eady pointed out, the " nucule " of Chara is essentially different from a carjpogonium, — is, in fact, an archegonium, — yet it presents a peculiarity in which it resembles the carpogonium of certain Car- posporecB, and in which it differs from the archegonium of a Moss. This peculiarity consists in the existence of one or more cells (Wendungszellen, A. Braiin) at the base of the central-cell, which have been divided fi-om it. These cells are usually regarded as being the representatives of those forming the trichopore of the FloridecB, that is, as the rudiments of an organ which exists fully developed in allied plants, the antherozoids of which are not endowed with the power of movement, but which is unnecessary in the CharacecB, because in them the antherozoids are actively motile. * « Journ. of Botany.' New Series. Vol. vii,, July, 1878, p. 202. \Idem. New Series, Vol. vii., September, 1878, p. 258. Also 'La Mor- fologia Vegetale.' Pisa. 1878. 8a 362 THE "pro-embryo" of chara. I cannot iDroceed, therefore, as Bennett does, to unite the Characeic with the ^hiscmea:^' I regard them as forming an inde- pendent group intermediate between the Carposporea and the 2Imcinc(c. Tliis is really to say that they link the Thallophytes to the Cormophytes, and this I believe to be actually the case. In the structure of their vegetative and reproductive organs they resemble the cormoid Thallophytes on the one hand and the thalloid Cormophytes on the other. Caruel proposes to j)lace the CharacecB (his Schistogams) between the Vascular Cryptogams (his Prothallogams) and the Phanerogams. He rejects, as I do, the supposed homology of the " pro-embryo" of Chara with the protonema of a Moss, and partly on this ground and partly on the ground that in Mosses the '' neutral form "' (sporophore ?) is definite in its evolution, whereas in Chara it is indefinite, he separates widely the Characea from the MuscinccBm spite of many obvious resemblances. Of these reasons the former is quite insufficient, as a consideration of the foregoing paragraphs of this paper will shew. As to the latter, the observa- :^ions of Pringsheim and of Stahl, to which reference has been made above, shew that the ''neutral form" of a Moss is not necessarily definite in its evolution. I am unable to ascertain exactly from his paper or from his book what Prof. Caruel con- siders to be the " neutral form " of Chara, but if it is either the oospore or the " pro-embryo," these sm-ely are definite in their evolution. He goes on to separate the Characea; from the Prothal- logams on account of the absence from the former of "anything like the sexual prothallus so peculiar to the Prothallogams," and also on account of " the com^Dlex organisation of the antherocj^st (globule) compared to the simj)ler antheridium, and o f the oogemma (nucule) compared to the archegonium, and of the different origin of both, which m Characecc proceed du'ectly from the neutral form and not from spores produced by it." Are we then to cease to regard the sexual C'Aam-plant as corresponding to the prothallus of a Fern, and are we to consider the sexual organs which it bears as a separate sexual generation ? Surely this is a view which has no foundation in true morphology. Can there be any reason for regarding the archegonia and antheridia of Chara as constituting a generation distinct from the plant which bears them, whilst no such distinction is made in the case of the prothallus of a Fern ? The feature of the Characea to which importance is attached as indicating a relationship with the Phanerogams is the " marked resemblance of structure, coupled with the same origin, between the oogemma of the one and the gemmule (misnamed ovule) of the other," and further, " the similarity of origin in the male forms of both the groups, equally proceeding from bodies which are modifications of leaves." Even if we admit, as Caruel does, that Celakovsky + has satisfactorily proved that the central- * This has been done also by Trevisan. (Conspectus ordinum Prothallo- phytorum, in 'Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg.', Ib77.) He unites the Bryojphyta and rhiicophyta {Characea) into oue group which he calls Anthogamce. f ' Flora," 1878, p. 49. NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. 363 cell of the archegonium of Chara (oogonium, Celakovsky) and the ovule of a Phanerogam are both phyllomes, and that the invest- ment of the former is comparable to that of the latter (ovary), still this fact does not necessarily establish the existence of a close relationship) between these plants. Do we not find among Mosses archegonia which are morphologically phyllomes, and p.re not these organs usually invested by leaves forming either a perichsetium or a perigynium ? It is scarcely necessary to go so far as to the Phanerogams to find female organs w^hich resemble those of the Cha racem in tlieu' mo^'x^hological nature when they occur close at hand in the Muscmece. The same remarks may be applied also to the male organs. It cannot be doubted that the antheridium of Chara much more closely resembles that of a Moss (which may be also a phyllome) than the stamen of a flowering plant. Caruel himself admits that great differences exist between the structure of the male organ of Chara and that of a stamen. This, together mth the difi:"erences in the embryology of the two groups, suffices to keep them distinct. The i3ermissibility of such a comparison of the reproductive organs of Chara and those of a Phanerogam is very questionable. It is admitted on all hands that these organs in Chara belong to the oophore, whereas the ovules and stamens of a Phanerogam belong to the sporophore. It is difficult to imagine from what morphological stand-point it is that Caruel i^roceeds to institute it. The ground upon which it is sought to establish the existence of a close relationship between the CharacecB and the Phanerogamce cannot be considered to be satisfactory, and if the interpretation of the facts of the life-history of Chara w^hich is given in this paper be the correct one, they lose even the appearance of plausibility. NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FEKNS. By H. C. Field, Esq. [The follomng notes, made from long observation of the Fenis of New Zealand in their native localities, were sent by Mr. Field in a letter merely intended for my own private instruction ; but they contain so much that is interesting and valuable that I have asked^and^obtained his permission to publish them. — J. G. Baker.] I think Gleichenia circinnata and fJ-. dicarpa are merely forms of the same plant. Here the lobes of both fold tightly back, so as to cover the sori, the only apparent difference being that, while those of the former are reflexed symmetrically, so as to cover all up closely, those of the latter fold back loi^sidedly, so as to leave a sort of deep cup-shaped cavity on the upper side of each lobe, or perhaps I should rather say on the side of it farthest removed from the stipes of the frond. I hardly fancy this distinction sufficient to justify their being separately classed ; and moreover, they 864 NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. constantly grow together (that is, dicarpa seems only to grow along with circinndtti, though the latter is often found alone), and are so mixed that I often think they must spring from the same rhizomes, though I have never been able to extract a rhizome with both kinds of frond upon it from the mud and moss of the swamps in which they occm\ I find, too, that some masses of the swamp- soil containing these ferns, which I was at some pains to bring down from the mountains, and plant in a favourably wet place in my garden, have for the last three years only produced circinnata fronds, though they contained quite an equal number of diccuya ones when I procured them. I may next note the characteristics of the caudices of our arborescent ferns. Cyatliea medidlaris grows to an ultimate height of from forty to a hundred feet or more, and the fronds, on withering, break short off from the caudex, leaving a rhomboidal scar on the latter, to show where each one grew. Thus the whole outer surface of the caudex consists of these scars, except just at the bottom, where there is often a small cone of fibrous matter, which occasionally attains the dimensions of eighteen inches in diameter at its base, and two feet or more in height. It consists of apparent root-fibres growing longitudinally doAvnwards from the caudex, but adhermg firmly together. It is caUed "Weki" by the Maoris, who split it into slabs, and use it to line then' potato- pits and storehouses, partly because it is almost imperishable and imper\ious to moisture, and partly because rats and mice do not gnaw through it as they will through wood. C. Cunninghami seems never to exceed fifteen or twenty feet in height, and its withered fronds, or then* rachises, remain hanging around the caudex for many years, often in fact nearly concealing it. When they di'op the separation seems efiected by a sort of healing process, which has gradually diminished the diameter of the actual base of the stijie, so that only a small scar remams on the otherwise smooth surface of the caudex. There is also occasionally a small cone of weki at the base of the caudex. C. dealhata attains a height of from thirty to fifty feet, and its caudex is quite different. The withered fi-onds are separated by their stipes breaking off at a distance of about eight inches from the caudex, which is roughened with them, and actually concealed by them (as they closely overlap each other) for the greater portion of its length. Ultimately they disappear, partly through perishing under atmospheric influence, but mostly through bemg buried in weki, which on these ferns not only forms cones often five to six feet high, by three feet in diameter at the ground, but covers the whole caudex, so as to make it often a foot or more in diameter. Hemitelia Smithii only grows to a height of fi'om fifteen to twenty feet, rarely exceeduig the former. Its withered fronds hang in a collar round the head of the caudex, just below the crown, for several years, and then either drop short off or leave so small a portion of stipe behind them that it is immediately covered up in weki, which in these ferns forms the whole outer surface of a caudex as thick as that of C. dealbata, but seldom, if ever, a basal cone. Alsophila Colensoi NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. 365 and Bicl-sonia Janata have creeping caudices, which anchor them- selves to the ground with rootlets as they run. As both these ferns grow high wp the mountains, so that they are buried in snow all the winter, one has few oi3portunities of observing them. I therefore got a number of plants of each last autumn, and planted them in a cool shady part of my garden^ where they are all grow- ing well. From watchmg then growth I am satisfied not only that they can never have a true erect caudex, but that even Mr. Henry and myself were deceived as to the soft portion of its termination standing erect. The whole caudex to its very end is prostrate, but the stipes of the crown rise at right angles (or rather at obtuse angles, as the plants grow on deeply inclined places) to it, and so closely together as to give the idea of the end of the caudex being pointed vertically. The continued horizontal growth of the caudex is, however, conclusively shown by the fact that, each sjDring, the new crown of fronds rises from beneath the side of the old one, and not from out of its centre, proving that during the year the apex of the caudex has extended beyond the cncle of the old stipes. The caudex, as I mentioned in a previous letter, often creeps to a distance of thu-ty or forty feet from its original root, and I can only account for the circumstance of its habit in this respect remaining so long unnoted from its small diameter and its being buried under the rotted fronds and other decaying vegetation, and from the fact that the plants grow in places which are seldom visited by persons likely to notice the peculiarity, except very occasionally towards the end of summer or early autumn, when the snow has melted from off the mountains and the old crowns have withered and fallen. I think, however, that I know how the mistake of supposing that these ferns have occasionally a true erect caudex has arisen. When, in creeping along, the caudex comes in contact with a fallen tree, it rises over it, and descends to the ground again on the other side ; and in the same way, on reaching the face of a precipitous bank, or face of rock, it climbs it, and resumes its horizontal course on the top. In either case, the caudex would be, for a time, actually erect, and a person ignorant of the creeping habit might easily fail to notice the fact that it was actually clinging by rootlets to the log or face ; and the more so as, in this case, the natural growth of the crown, at an angle to the caudex, would appear to have arisen from its being forced out of the perpendicular by the obstruction, and would to a great extent cause the fronds to hide the caudex. The caudex of Lomaria jn-ocera constantly grows in the same manner, and on steep faces often (I think more often than not) actually descends. So usual indeed is the creeping habit, particularly in large plants, that many people fancy this fern has a creeping rhizome. In the description of Alsophila CoJensoi I notice a misprint in the * Sjmopsis ' of inches for feet in respect of the length of the frond. Dicksonia squarrosa grows fully twenty-five feet high, and the caudex, which is very slender and hard, is covered by the bases of old stipes broken off at a distance of from eight to twelve inches from it. No weki grows on this fern. With us the stipes, rachis, &c., and the 366 NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. scales on them, vary from medium brown to almost jet-black in different ijlants, and the shape of the fronds is broadly lanceolate, about two or three pairs of pinnae only inclining downwards, rather than oblong-deltoid. The general colour of the frond, too, is yellowish green, while that of I), fibrosa is bluish green. In both the under surface has a greyer tinge than the upper one. I), fibrosa is said occasionally to reach twenty feet in height, though I have never seen one even fifteen feet high. In this fern the actual caudex is thin, not more than one inch and a half to two inches in diameter, yet it appears to be often fifteen or eighteen inches in diameter, owmg to its being covered wdth a thick coating of long, nearly black, scales, interlaced and matted together, as if felted, so as to form a substance varying in harshness from sheep's-wool to cocoa-nut fibre. There is none of the true fibrous weki on this fern, but its sides are often adzed off by the Maoris, so that its caudex is reduced to a slab about two and a half or three inches thick, which is used in the same w^ay as weki. The scales on the stipes and rachises are purplish black, the fronds lanceolate, the broadest part being above the centre, and the stipes and rachises yellowish brown, but lighter below than above. Fully half the pinnse incline dow^nw^ards. D. lanata has the second pau' of pinnae the longest, though the first (which alone incline downwards) are very little shorter, and the breadth of the frond is fully two-thirds of its length. The stipes is densely clothed with soft bright brown hairy scales, and the rachis, though smoother and of a brownish green below, has an upper surface like dark brown velvet. The colour of the frond generally is bright yellowish green. As regards the Hijinenoplujlla, I note that H. Cheesemannii occurs throughout at any rate the north island of New Zealand, and not merely at Titirangi. In H. subtiUssimum the hah's are bristly rather than silky, and grow in clusters. H. javanicum has often a straight flat wing along the stipes and rachis, the crisping being confined to the other ]3arts of the frond. H. demissum passes into H. fiabellatum, so that no one can tell where one ends and the other begins, though their extreme forms differ so widely. H. scabrum often has its surface velvety rather than glabrous. H. clila- tatum produces fronds sometimes three feet long, and those of H. puklicrrimum often measure two and a half feet. The ordinary form of the latter fern creeps so slightly that it is generally regarded as a tufted plant, though I am told that at Taranaki a more widely creeping type is occasionally met with. H. bivalve can always be identified at once by its weeping habit of growth, a result probably of the terminal position of its son, and of their large size. Trichomanes LyalUi grows at the Thames gold-fields and Welling- ton, as well as on the south-west coast of the middle island, and is, therefore, probably distributed throughout the colony. T. venosum varies greatly in its lobing, sometimes having beautifully regular palmate or flabelliform pinnae, and at others having some lobes five or six times as long as the rest. T. huinile again grows very irregularly. As a rule it has no regular rachis or pinnae, but NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. 367 divides several times dichotomously, so as to produce a sort of zigzag rachis along one side of the frond, whicli thus becomes lopsidedly triangular, and widest near the upper end, or perhaps I should rather say lower one, as the plant always grows on steep faces, with its fronds hanging downwards. T. Colensoi grows in a similar pendulous manner, but truly pinnated. As regards Darallia, we have two common forms here, though I cannot clearly make out from the description if either of them is D. Forsteri. One has a widely creeping habit, from its very fii'st appearance as a seedling, and sends up solitary fronds at distant intervals from the rhizome. The stipes is short, and the frond ovate-lanceolate, the low^est pinnae being nearly or quite as long as any, and all curving upwards. The whole texture of the frond is very why, and the stipes and rachis are glossy reddish brown. The sori are very adiantoid in appearance, but I coidd not say that any of them w^ere terminal, unless just at the apices of the pinnae, where the point of the segment projects scarcely if at all beyond them. This plant seldom if ever exceeds eighteen inches high. The other is a larger x^lant, sometimes two and a half feet high, and with broader thinner foliage. It is not truly tufted, and yet creejDS so slightly as to look almost so. Plants which I have had growing for the last four years, and which must have been several years old when I got them, have not yet spread to the sides of a six-inch flower-pot, and have in that space as many as from thirty to forty fronds, growing to a length of from twelve to fifteen inches. The stipes are yellowish green, and longer than those of the cree^Ding sort, and the fronds are rhomboidal, the length one and a half times the breadth, and the lowest pair of pinnae often incline downwards, while the rest grow out at right angles, or nearly so, with the rachis. A plant thus forms a most beautiful mass of foliage. We have an arborescent DavalUa, if not a tufted one also, towards the head of om- river, but I have only a sohtary dried specimen of the former, and cannot get more at present, owing to the Maoris having shut up the country where it grows to prevent peox^le prospecting for gold. It has harsher and more wiry foliage than the creeping plant, with a coppery tinge, and very adiantoid involucres. In all our Davallias the sorus grows rather on the larger side of a segment, which curls partially around it, and then sticks out like a claw, the whole presenting an appearance very similar to that of a dog's toe. Lindsaya linearis has distinct barren and fertile fronds, the former having far larger thinner pinnae, and growing earlier in the spring than the others, as appears to be invariably the case -where ferns have both sorts of fronds. On steep faces and hill sides L. trichomanoides produces pendent fronds often eighteen inches long by not more than two and a half or three inches broad. All our Adianta have short, thick, creeping rhizomes, except A. diaphanum, which has fibrous roots furnished with little bulb- shaped tubers. A. affine is often two feet high or more, and the pinnules, which are bluish green, are very large, particularly in young plants. A. fidcwn grows fully two and a half feet high, 868 NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. and its pinnules are olive-green, and in young plants are of medium size and rather narrowly triangular, though in large fronds they become rounder and very small. The stipes is often black, or nearly so, and rough or prickly, though the rachises are smooth and rusty coloured above. A. diaphanicm has blackish green foliage, and A. ictkiopicum light delicate green : the latter sometimes approximates closely to A. cuneatum. A. formosum abounds all along the western bases of the Tararna, Euahine, and Kaweka ranges ; in fact the country for a distance of seventy miles long, by nearly twenty miles broad, is full of it : and along the banks of the Waikanae, Otaki, Ohan, Waikawa, Manawatu, Orona, and Pohanguia rivers, it forms dense thickets, like the bracken at home. It often grows five feet or more in height, and no fronds less than from two and a half to three feet high are soriferous. Its colour is bluish green, with prickly or hahy black stipes and rachises. Hypolepis distaiis is very scarce in its true type, which, by the way, differs from Atlujrimn Jilix-fccmina in having a widely creeping rhizome ; but it appears to pass into Pohjpodmm rugulosiim, so that it is almost impossible to discriminate between them, and one actually sees more fronds of the latter than of the former labelled as ** if. distans " in collections, and even persons who make a business of collecting ferns, for sale as plants or specimens, aj)pear to supply the wrong one in this case more often than not. The true plant is very hard to transplant. Of Cheilantlies we have three types in the colony, but I believe they are only forms of the same plant. First, there is the form known here ?is '' Sieberi" (though it and the next differ from the descriptions of them) which has a long stipes, and from five to fifteen pairs of nearly equal- sized broad foliaged pinna (when sori- ferous the foliage of course looks narrower from the lobes cm-ling over), the whole forming an oblong frond suddenly narrowed at the a]3ex. The stipes and rachis are reddish brown. Secondly, there is what we call C. tenuifolia, which has a long deltoid frond and much more minute foliage, with black stipes and rachis ; and, thirdly, there is the large sort which grows north of Auckland, and is described by Colenso, and which appears to be between the two, though larger than either. The first grows fully two feet high ; the second seldom, if ever, exceeds a foot ; while the thu'd, by Colenso's description, is over four feet high, and I have seen specimens more than three feet myself. The difference between them is, however, no greater than occurs in many of our ferns in different localities, without any one for a moment di-eaming of classing the ferns separately. Lomanaprocera, Asplcnium bulbiferwn, and A. jlaccidum would in fact yield each a dozen more widely different types in this colony alone. Pelhca rotundi folia and P. falcata, again, are gradually being admitted to be merely forms of the same plant. Pteris trennda is a tufted plant, and has a strong aromatic odour (particularly the Ki)u/iana type) when bruised or broken. In fact in some of our deep gulleys the scent is often quite unpleasantly strong on a hot day, even when the plants are uninjured. P. scabenda varies much NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. 369 in its foliage, sometimes having its ultimate segments long and coarse, and at others quite laxy from the minuteness of the sub- divisions. Though P. comans and P. macilenta differ so widely in then* extreme forms, the intermediate links make it quite impossible to tell where one ends and the other begins, and it is not unusual to find fronds with the undulated edge which are mentioned as the characteristic of P. undulata. Both are tufted ferns. Om* P. incisa has the barren lobes round or oval, and the fertile ones triangular. Possibly the x^artial folding over of the edge of the fertile lobes gives the altered appearance, though the rounded lobes seem never to produce sori. Our Lomaria Patersoni or L. elongata produces both simple and pinnatifid fronds on the same plant, and the latter are often from three to four feet long. The fronds rise singly from widely creeping rhizomes. Our L. discolor has long creeping underground rhizomes, from which tufts rise at intervals. These tufts ultimately develope caudices two feet or more in height. The fertile fi-onds always rise in the centre of the crown, from within the circle of barren ones : they are always longer than the latter, and always have large leafy bases to theu' pinnae. The pinnae, too, of both fronds are always alternate. L. vulcanica has very small leafy bases to its fertile pinnae. Our L. lanceolata is merely a tufted plant never developing any caudex. The barren fronds have scarcely any stipes, and are nearly always curved, but the fertile ones, which stand erect within them and are shorter, have longer stipes and are straight. The veins of the barren fronds are very conspicuous, being usually far darker-coloured than the rest of the frond, and often copper- coloured or crimson, and contrasting beautifully with the rest of the foliage. The young fertile fronds are often of the same colours, though they change to dark green afterwards. L. alpina throws up its fronds in tufts or clusters from creeping rhizomes. Most of the pinnae in both barren and fertile fi'onds are deflexed. L. procera varies wonderfully in texture, colour, and form of pinnae. Some- times it has the harsh texture and dark bluish green colour of L. Patersoni, and at others is thin almost to filminess, and of a pale yellowish green. In form the pinnae vary from circular to long oblong-lanceolate with tails at the ends almost as long as the pinnae, while their edges are sometimes entire and sometimes quite deeply serrated or crenated. L. Jiliformis has only small fronds, with romid or oval pinnae, so long as it creeps on the ground. As it ascends trees it develops its large long-pinnad barren fronds ; and the fertile ones are produced at a later period still. L. nigra, L. fluviatilis, and L. memhranacea are only tufted plants, and the last has its fertile fronds on short stipes not more than one inch long. In all the fertile fronds stand erect inside the circle of prostrate barren ones. L. pumila seems a doubtful fern. I can find no one who has ever seen it, and some (Mr. Kirk among them) seem certain there is no such plant in the colony. I fancy that the specimens in your herbarium must be from a form of either L. alpina or L. memhranacea. I thought I had got hold of L. pumila lately, but on watching the plant I feel satisfied it is merely L. 3b 370 NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. alpina with unusually tender foliage, owing to its growing in a dry soil, and among high scrub into which no wind can penetrate, hi stead of in its usual habitat of siDhagnum swamp exposed to light and air. Doodia caudata is, I believe, quite distinct from D. media, unless they are divergent forms of some plant not found in the colony. They grow in quite different situations, the former being an alpine and the latter a littoral plant ; and D. caudata is very rare, being confined to two or three localities. Indeed what the Maoris (who held it sacred) regard as the true "■ Mokemoke" is confined to one • part of the Wairarapa, where it grows on a spur of the Rimutaka range, and where it has a rather strong aromatic odour between those of thyme and tobacco. There is a difference, too, in the habits of the plants, D. media producing only a single caudex, while that of 1). caudata parts into a number of lateral ones, and so produces a much thicker mass of foliage. The foliage, too, is widely different, the barren fronds of D. caudata, when true to type, being shaped like shamrock leaves, and the fertile ones having the two small round lateral lobes and a very long central one (some- times one inch and a half long) with slightly serrated edges. Aspleniiim obtusatum and A. falcatum often strongly resemble each other, but they can be readily distinguished by noting that, in all forms of the former, the sori are set obliquely to the costa, but parallel to each other, while in the latter they form lines radiating from the stalk of the pinnae. A. Hookerianum varies from simply pinnate to tri- or quadri-pinnate, and from coriaceous to almost filmy in texture, in different soils and localities. A. hulbifenim has occasionally quite lanceolate fronds. It assumes aU sorts of types, from nearly simply pinnate to trij)innate, and seems to pass into other kinds. I have specimens scarcely distinguishable from A. Hookerianum and A. Colensoi, except by their colour, and, of course, the bulbs; and I think that A. Richardi is only a form connecting A. hidhiferum and A. Jiaccidum, as I have i:)lants of what was supposed to be it which actually produce occasional bulbs, and the colour is the same. A. umbrosum varies greatly in type. Besides the form described, and which, by the way, has the lobes distinctly stalked towards the bases of the pinnae, as have also the others, there is a kind only growing about two and a haK feet high with falcate or scythe- shaped lobes, and another about two feet high with much more abundant foliage, and the lobes rounded, but with crenated edges. It occurs at Taranaki. Both these last have the short sori mentioned as characteristic of A. hians, and the fructification never covers the pinnules as it does in the large plant. All throw off runners which produce fresh tufts. Asjndium acideatum varies more than many ferns distinctly classed. Var. vestitum develops a caudex, and becomes almost arborescent. There is one old plant a few miles from here, the caudex of which, at about a foot above the ground, parts into three branches, which all rise to the height of nearly six feet, and have dense crowns of fronds two and a half feet long, the whole forming a noble fern. I have several times thought of transplanting it NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND PEENS. 371 into my garden, but as it grows among large timber I have been afraid of injm-ing its roots and killing it in moving. If the bush were being cleared I should certainly try it, as the plant could but die in either case. A. vestitum has usually a short stout stipes and stout rachis, and the pinnae are of equal length for the greater part of the length of the frond, giving it an oblong-lanceolate form. The fronds are very numerous and densely foliaged. What we regard as the sylvaticum form is simply a tufted plant with very long thin stipes, thin rachis, and pinnae and pinnules farther asunder. The last are also more distinctly stalled, so that the whole frond is as it were loosely put together. There are very few fronds, not more than half a dozen or so on a plant, and they are almost deltoid in shape. We have other forms which approximate to A. Richardi, and a very beautiful one with short stipes, almost deltoid frond, and very numerous and closely-^Dlaced pinnse and j)innules, the last being far more lanceolate in form than the other kinds, and more deeply and finely serrated in the edges. A. oculatmn I do not know with certainty. Your description seems to agree with that of a plant which grows here, and is marked as " oculatum" in the herbarium at the Colonial Museum ; yet Mr. Kirk maintains that it is merely a form of A. Richardi (in which he is certainly right), and he has a totally different soft-foliaged fern as " oculatum,'' which agrees with a description in the Transactions of om- New Zealand Institute. I have not been able to get a specimen of Kirk's fern, which grows only in Wairarapa and some parts of the Canterbury. The involucres have a large black disc and narrow reddish margin, while ours have a small black disc and broad white margin. A. cajyense is here almost always non-indusiate, and the indusium, when it occurs, can scarcely be seen without a magnifying glass. A. cystostegia only grows where it is covered mth snow for several months each year. Nejyhrodium decompositum and N. velutinum are wrongly classed among plants with wide-spreading rhizomes. The latter is a tufted plant, never producing more than about half a dozen fronds at a time ; and of the other we have at least two forms. The one has scattered scales on the stipes, long white silky hairs on the rachis, and a soft velvety frond of a light green colour. It has creeping rhizomes, but they seldom spread more than a few inches, say a foot, from the original root. The other is a tufted plant with much narrower, harsher-textured, finely-divided foliage of a dark green colour, and stipes and rachis sometimes greyish green and perfectly smooth and glossy, and sometimes coated with dark brown velvety down. The former, which is very scarce, while the other abounds, is generally called var. glahcllum, but I fancy wrongly. Of N. hisjndum we have also two forms. The one which most nearly meets your description has stout rhizomes which spread over spaces many yards square, and from which the fronds spring generally in clusters. It has very stout and very hairy stipes and rachis, and seldom exceeds fifteen inches in height. The stipes is short. The other is a far larger plant, occasionally growing four feet high, and is usually tufted, though in very large plants I have 372 NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND FERNS. foiiud instances of the outer fronds springing from runners an inch or so in length. It however never runs farther. The stipes is longer and slighter in proportion than that of the other khid, and far less hairy — indeed, sometimes scarcely at all so ; but the foliage of both plants is precisely the same, even to being similarly shaded with a sort of striped pattern of alternate light and dark green. In our Nephrolepis the fronds are very frequently narrowed about two-thh'ds of the way up, and the sori are produced all over the under-surface, instead of only on the upper portion as in the Australian plant. Ours, too, has the white dots on the upper surface far more strongly developed than I have ever seen them in the other. Of Polypodium j^^f^^ctatum we have again two forms at least. One has a yellow viscous stipes and rachis and a broad fi'ond, and is often mistaken for Hj/polepis tenuifoHa. The other has dark brown velvet}' stipes and rachis, which I have never found viscous. Its frond is long and narrow, and it is constantly confounded with H. distans. It is so hard to distinguish between both the above and the corresponding Hijpolepis, that I should not be at all surprised to find them classed as merely non-indusiate forms of these ferns, as P. syhaticum has been of A. acideatum. I fancy both the above would be included in var. rugidosum ; and some persons say that there is no true P. punctatum in the colony. I have, however, a fi-ond which was sent me from Auckland which I think is it, for though in other respects greatly resembling the first form I have described, its sori are much farther from the margin, and no larger than those of P. pennigerum. Our P. australe, the old Grammitis australis, is a tufted plant, not a creeping one ; and P. peimigeriim has a strong caudex often four feet high. P. tmellum has the edges of its innnse entu-e till the sori are developed, when a lobe forms round each, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that the interval between them becomes indented, as the width over all does not increase. P. Cunninghami is certainly usually tufted, though I am uot sure whether the tufts may not grow from creeping rhizomes, as the fern covers the whole surface of the tree trunks. The Polypodium, which you pro^Dose to call by the name of novcB-zelcmdia, has been found lately by Mr. Cheeseman, of Auckland, in two other places about fifty miles north of w^here my son first saw it. Our Gymnogramme leptophylla, though a small form of the plant, has a bulbous or tuberous root, and is bi- or triennial, dying down towards the end of summer and coming u]d again in the winter or early spring. Schizaa bifida has baiTen as well as fertile fronds. The barren ones are from three to five inches long by two to three inches wide, and several times dichotomously divided. The fertile ones are once or twice divided only and from eight to fifteen inches long. In the barren fronds the branches spread widely asunder, but in the fertile ones they grow almost parallel. I fancy that the first eight Ophioglossa in your list are all forms THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. 373 of one fern, as I could get plants which would answer all then* descriptions out of my own paddock ; yet I regard all as ''vidgatum." There are often two and sometimes three leaves to one fertile spike. I think that Botryckium cicutarium and B. dissectum might fairly be separately classed. They never grow together, the former occurring only among fern, grass, or manuka-scrub ; and the latter, though so much smaller and more delicate, only on the richest bush soil. B. dissectum often has quite mossy foliage, Hke that of Todea superha. It is possible that there may be similar apparent inaccuracies of description as regards other New Zealand ferns, but I have only noted those in respect of plants growing hereabouts, and with which I am thoroughly familiar. THE CEYPTOdAMIC FLOEA OF KENT. By E. M. Holmes, F.L.S. (Concluded from p. 345.) LeCIDEA MILLLA.RLV, Fv. On the earth and decaying wood. On heathy ground, Toy's Hill. Known by its almost globular crowded apothecia and obtuse spores from L. sahidetorum. L. sabuletorum, Flk. On decayed mosses, &c. Fant Woods, near Maidstone. L. ROSELLA (Pers.) On trees; rare. E. B. 1651. On the root of an ash tree in a hedge near Chelsfield. L. RUBELLA (Ehrh.) On elm trees, &c. ; common. Chelsfield ; Selling ; Lulhngstone Park ; Chilstone Park ; Maidstone. [L. endoleuca, with black apothecia, white internally, and acicular multiseptate spores, should be looked for on trees in Kent.] L. effusa [Sm.) On trees, rocks, &c. Var. funella, Fr. On trees near Maidstone ; Sibertswold. Var. ccBsio-pruinosa, Mudd. On elder trees ; frequent. Beech- borough ; Sibertswold ; Waldershare ; Newington. L. PELIDNA, Ach. On rocks and stones. Mudd, Manual (spores only) t. 3, f. 69. Sundridge, near Sevenoaks. L. PETR^A (^Wulf.) On rocks, pebbles, &c. Lydd Beach ; common on the pebbles in company with Lecanoia yibbusa. 374 THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. L. CONCENTRICA, DuV. Ou calcareous rocks. E. B. 246. Brastead. Graphidiei. Graphis elegans {Sm.) Opegrapha (E. B.) On holly and other trees ; rather rare. E. B. 1812. Tiinbridge Wells, Mr. Thompson ; Leight. Lich. Fl. Witley Scrubs, near Sevenoaks; Toy's Hill, in very fine con- dition. Known by its longitudinally-fuiTOwed lirellge. G. SCRIPTA, Ach. On coppice oaks, &c. ; frequent. Wye ; Ide Hill, and Brastead Chart, near Sevenoaks. Var. serpentina, Ach. Leight. Br. Graph., t. 6., f. 21. Dunton Green. The variety serpentina may be known by its obtuse lirellaB from G. imista, which it somewhat resembles. [Litlwgrajjha dendrographa and Graphis dendritica should be looked for in Kent, the former on old elms or oaks, the latter on holly and other treei in damp woods in hilly districts.] Opegrapha herpetica, Ach. On trees, often near the roots, usually in shady places. E.B. 1789. Brastead Chart ; Wye. May usually be recognised by the small lirellaB and the reddish tint of the thallus, which becomes of a deeper red when touched with solution of potash. 0. ATRA, Pers. On trees; frequent. Leight. Br. Graph., t. 5, f. 11. Edenbridge. Occurs in white small patches with the lirellae crowded towards the centre. May be mistaken for Opegrapha viridis, which has a minutely-cracked thallus, with rounded apothecia mixed with the linear ones, and spores 13-septate. 0. sAXicoLA, Ach. Var. gyrocarpa (Zw.) On greensand rocks ; not common. Fant Woods, near Maidstone. Var. Persoonii, Ach. On the rocks on Tunbridge Wells, and Eusthall Common ; Forster Fl. Tunhr. [0. confiuens should be looked for on the rocks near the sea at Sandgate.] 0. VARiA, Pers. Var. notha. On old trees. E.B. 1890. In the wood behind the Sussex Tavern, Tunbridge Wells ; Forster Fl. Tunhr. Trees near Eynsford Viaduct ; Lullingstone Park, near Shoreham. 0. LYNCEA {Sm.) On old oaks, not common ; rare in Kent. THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. 375 On the Bear's Oak at Penshurst, Kent ; Mr. Thompson. height. L. Fl. On old oaks in Cobham Park ; very fine and abundant. Easily recognised by its chalky white thallus, unbranched, pruinose lirellas, and 7-septate spores. 0. viRiDis, Pers. On old trees (rare ; Leight. L. Fl.) Common in Kent. Leight. Br. Graph., t. 6, f. 14. Trees near Grofton Park Farm, Orpington ; Eynsford ; Otford ; Brastead ; Barming ; near Cossington Spring, Maidstone. Frequent on the thin, easily-separating bark of yew trees. The var. saxicola, Leight., I have not observed in Kent. This sj)ecies is easily known by its acicular 13-septate spores. [0. prosodea, Ach., should be looked for on very old oaks, since it has been found in Sm-rey. 0. vulgata is probably not uncommon, but has been overlooked.] Stigmatidium crassum, Dub. Petusaria crassa (Jenner Fl. Tunbr.) On old trees ; common, but rarely well-developed in Kent. E. B. 1752. Wrotham ; Chislehurst ; Ightham ; Thornden Wood ; Moldash ; Sevenoaks. On trees on Tunbridge Wells Common ; Hungershall Rocks ; Jenner Fl. Tunbr. Arthonia astroldea, Ach. Ojjegrapha (Forster Fl. Tunbr.) On trees. E. B. 1847. Remarkably fine on some young birch trees in the wood behind the Sussex Tavern; Forster Fl. Timbr. On ash trees, Ightham ;^Ohkubo ! A. ciNNABARiNA (Wallv.) SpUoma tumidulum (Forster Fl. Tunbr.) On old trees, &c. E. B. 2151. In the little wood behind the Sussex Tavern at Tunbridge ; Wells \tForster Fl. Tunhr. Y&v. anerythrcea, Nyl. Thornden Wood, near Canterbury. A. PRUiNOSA, Ach. On old trees ; not common. E. B. Supplt. 2692, f. 1. Lullingstone Park ; Cobham Park. Known by its immersed i^ruinose apothecia, and cracked, rough, or wrinkled thallus. A. PROXIMELLA, Nyl. I I On oak trees. Grevillea, vol. i., pi. iv., f. 3. Woolwich Wood, near Sibertswold. NoRMANDiNA L^TEviRENS, Tuvn. S Borr. On damp sandstone rocks ; very rare in Kent. Hungershall Rocks. \N pulchella (Borr.) should be looked for on Jungermannia dilatata in woods near Dover and Hythe, and Endocarpon hepaticum, Ach., on calcareous walls, and E. mmiatum on greensand rocks.] 376 THE CRYPTOGAMIC FLORA OF KENT. Verrucaria nigrescens {Pers.) Ou walls and rocks; frequent. Leight. Ang. Lich. t. 2761. On roots of trees in chalky soil, Otford ; Toy's Hill. Fant Wood, Maidstone, on greensand rocks. V. FuscELLA, Turn. On walls; rare. E. B. t. 1500. Hytlie. V. GLAUCINA (Ach.) On calcareous walls ; frequent. Abbey Wood ; Sevenoaks ; Hytlie. V. RUPESTRis, Schrad. Var. muralis, Ach. Leight. Ang. Lich., t. 26, f. 1. On sand- stone rocks, Hythe. V. GEMMATA, Ach. On trees; frequent. E. B. Supplt. 2617, f. 2. Trees near Otford ; Halstead ; Dover. V. NiTiDA (Weig.) Var. nitidella, Flk. On trees ; not very common. Hothfield Park. Easily recognised by its i^ale brown waxy thallus and small numerous apothecia. V. OLivACEA, Borr. On trees; rather rare. E. B. Supplt. t. 2597, f. 1. Near Ashurst Wood, Penshurst. This lichen closely resembles V. Taylori in appearance, but is easily distinguished by its 7-septate spores, those of V. Taylori being 1 -septate. From the small number of species above recorded of the Lecideinei, Graphidiei, and Pyrenocarpei, it will be seen that there is yet much to be done in these groups in Kent, and many species might probably be added by careful observers. I may here remark that I shall be glad to examine and record any specimens of Kentish lichens sent for that purpose to my address, 30, Arthur Eoad, Holloway. Insert under Sphoerophoron coralloides, Pers. (p. 210). Muscus coralloides Tunhridyensishracteolis nigerrimis, Petiv., Muse. Cent, ii. et iii. 1698, no. 437. Found by Mr. Petiver on the rocks near Tunbridge. This locality is given because the plant still grows, although I have not observed it in fruit, on rocks on the Kentish side of Tunbridge Wells. SHORT NOTES. 377 SHOET NOTES. Eemakks on some Casual Plants of Northamptonshire. — Nor- thampton shii'e is certainly not poor in introduced plants. Perhaps the richest habitat for these is in the neighbourhood of the sewage works, the sides of the depositing tanks being covered with a rich and pecuhar flora. Lepidium. Draba, L., is one of its chief con- stituents, seeding freely : this plant also occurs in several parts of the country, and promises in time to be a perfect weed. Erysimum cheiranthoides, L., occurs rarely, although very frequent on the rail- banks about Blisworth and Kingsthorpe. Sisijmbyium Sophia, L., rivals L. Draba in abundance, covering not only the sides of the tanks, but growing out of the brickwork and on the rubbish heaps all about the works. This plant occurs generally in the Nene Valley, although not very persistent in its locahties. This year, on some ground frequently flooded, among undoubted mdigenous plants, such as Rayiunculus sceleratus, Polygonum Hydropiper, &c., occurred a single specimen of a Lythrum, which, except for the unusually large flowers, I took to be L. Hyssojnfolia, but having sent Mr. Baker a portion of it he named it L. Jiexuosum, Lag. Speci- mens of Tragopogon porrifolius, L., occun^ed last year. Solanum nigrum, L., a very local plant in Northants, occurs in garden ground near the works : and Datura Stramonium is very frequent ; this plant has occurred in cultivated ground on this side of the town for many years, in some places being a perfect pest. Ryoscyamus niger, L., formerly an abundant j)lant round Northampton, has now disappeared. Verbascwn virgatum was frequent last year, but is absent now. As might be expected, the Chenoj)ods form an imj)or- tant constituent of this sewage flora. Chenopodium olidum, Curt., is frequent. C. album is abundant, its three varieties, candicans, ■ viride and paganum, being readily separable, viride being the most frequent. C. hybridum, L., very abundant, and is a common plant about Northampton. C. rubritm, L., most abundant and exceed- ingly variable as to height ; fertile specimens may be gathered from one and a half inch to four feet high. Setaria viridis, Beauv., is generally to be found. Panicum miliaceimi, an occasional plant. Polyjwgon monspeliensis , Desf., plentiful this year. Symj)hytum. asperrimum, Bieb., noticed this year, by the Nene banks above Mr. Perry's mill, possibly introduced from the skin washing higher up the river. This year have occurred Medicago denticulata, Willd., and M. maculata, Sibth., in great plenty, and some few specimens of Trifolium. resupinatuni, L., also were found. — G. C. Druce. Euphorbia pilosa and palustris — These two plants are probably forms of one species, which is found near Bath. It is admitted in the ' Student's Flora,' ed. 1, and excluded from ed. 2 without remark. But it has been known in the place where it now grows for 300 3 c 378 SHORT NOTES. years, as it was seen there by L'Obel before 1576 (See his ' Sth-imimHistoria,' 194). It was also seen there by Thorn. Johnson and his friends in 1634, as stated in his ' Mercurius Botanicus,' which I have before me. I beheve that I was the first to call attention to it in my ' Fl. Bathoniensis ' in 1833, and the late Edw. Forster wrote about it in ' Linn. Trans.', xvii. 523. The old authors say that it is found " by a wood-side some miles south of Bathe." And L'Obel adds that it was '* in sylva de Joannis Coltes i^rope Bathoniam " that he found it. I have seen it in what is in all probability the same wood, as well as in the lane where it is usually looked for. I may also refer to my ' Fl. Bath. Sup^Dl.' 90, for the statement of the same facts. I venture to think that we ought not to exclude a plant of 300 years' standing without show- ing some reason, and that a valid one, which is not done in the ' Student's Flora.' — C. C. Babington. A NEW Locality for Teucrium Botrys. — We are indebted to Mr. H. Peirson for specimens of this very rare British species, collected by him in August last, in a locality a little distance to the south of Addington, in Surrey, near the Kentish boundary. This is at a considerable distance from the Boxhill station, to which it is quite similar in character, namely, a very diy barren field on the slope of a valley on the chalk. Perhaps some of our Surrey or London botanists may already know of this locality, but it has not, we beheve, been previously recorded in print. Ch^toceros armatum, T. West. — This filamentous Diatom was found by me on the Norfolk coast at Scratley, near Yarmouth, in 1851, and was the subject of a paper by Tufien West, which appeared in the 'Trans. Microsc. Soc.', with a'^ figure, vol. viii. pi. 7. There was some doubt expressed as to the nature of this Diatom, as some naturahsts considered it to be the case of an Annehd, but the paper referred to has, I think, settled the question. It has been found on various parts of the coast since. Last July I met with it in great abundance at Hunstanton, Norfolk. — Hampden G. Glass- POOLE. Urtica pilulifera, L., used to be found growing pretty freely at Lowestoft, Suffolk, some years ago. This season only three or four small plants were to be seen in the old locality by the side of a wall on the lower road between the sea and the town. — Hampden G. Glasspoole. NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 379 Nottcts of lioofts antr iJltmotvi^. Memoirs of the Botanic Garden at Chelsea, belontjing to the Society of Apothecaries of London. By tlie late Henry Field, Esq. Eevised, coiTected, and continued to the present time, by E. H. Semple, M.D. London : printed by Gilbert and Eivington. 1878. The editor of this interesting history of the old Chelsea Garden may be congratulated on the happy manner in which he has executed his work, and carried on its memorials to the present day. Mr. Field's original book was printed in 1820, and though fifty-eight years is but a short time in the history of a city company, yet this period has seen such an extension of London westward that the Apothecaries' Physic Garden is now completely within its bounds, and subject to all the baneful influences of its smoke-laden atmosi)here. The formation a few years back of the Chelsea embankment has still further altered the physical cha- racters of the garden, and destroyed completely the picturesque river front. In spite of all changes, however, the Society has steadfastly held on to their tenure, and continued, at a large cost, to kee^) up the scientific character of their garden. It must be allowed that the Society deserves well of botanists, and has contributed largely in the past, often in the face of difficulties and discourage- ments, to foster and facihtate the study of plants. That it is still animated by the same sj)irit is evidenced by the i)resent state of the garden and by the examination for women founded in this year. The book is much fuller than Field's, and contains a portrait of Sir Hans Sloane, the donor of the land, a charming view of the garden from the river, several plans, and a complete hst of the plants cultivated at the present time, di-awn up by the well-known curator, Mr. Thomas Moore. The only want is an index of names of persons mentioned in the book. There are several inte- resting biographical sketches of botanists who have been connected with the garden, the last being that of Mr. N. B. Ward, who took a prominent i^art in restoring and maintaining it in a state of scientific efficiency. The memoii' of Mr. Thomas Wheeler, for forty-two years Demonstrator of Botany to the Society, is written with much freshness, evidently from personal remembrance. Dr. Semple has indeed clearly been animated throughout by a love of his work, and has given us a little book which cannot fail to be read with interest and pleasure. H. T. Anthopht/ta quce in Japonia leyit beat. Emayiuel Weiss, Med. Dr. et qu(E museo nationali himc/arico ^jroc?t/'«fzt Joannes Xanthus, mus. nat. conserv., enumerat Augustus Kanitz. Buda- Pesth. 1878. This is a simple enumeration, with localities, of the plants gathered by the A ustro- Hungarian Expedition in Japan. Scarcely 380 NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. any of the species seem rare ones, but we may mention Lojyhatherum japonicum, Steud., Paidownia tomentosa, Thbg., Phtheirospermum japonicum, Tlibg., Leonurus macrantlius, Max., Gentiana Buergeri, Miq., Pertija scandens, Schz. Bip., var. ovata, Imjmtiens Textori, Miq., Selimim Japonicum, Fr. & Sav., and Desmodium Oldhami, Oliv. The author promises a further memoir on Japanese plants, leaving us to suppose that he has merely printed here the names of species which he was able to determine. S. M. Henkici G. Eeichenbach ;?/., Otia hotanica Hamburgensia. Fasciculus primus, Hamburg, 1878. Five papers are brought together in this fasciculus, namely, an account of the orchids gathered by F. C. Lehmann in Eguador, by Godefroy-Lebeuf in Cambodia, by the United States exploring expedition of 1838-42, and by Schweinfurth in Ethiopia, as well as an account, supplementary to the well-known one in the ' Linnean Transactions,' of the treasures secm-ed by Parish at Moulmein. The first contains descriptions of several new species of 2Iasdevallia, Stelis, Epidendrum, Odontoglossum, &c. In the second we notice the names of Gymnadenia Galeandra, Kchb. f., a species known from China, Hong-Kong, Assam, and Khasia, Habenaria RumpJiii, Ldl., Peristijlis goodyeroides, Ldl., Cymbidium pendulum, Sw., and Dendrobium crumenatum , Sw. The memoir on Schweinfurth's plants also includes stray notes on and descriptions of other orchids from Afi'ica, with a diagnosis of a new genus Pteroglossaspis (near Cyrtojjera) ; Schweinfiu'th has found Habenaria cirrhata, Rchb., f. hitherto known only from Madagascar, and this discovery is compared with that of Angrmum ebunieum, Thouars, a species recently gathered by Wakefield in Nyika country. S. M. An interesting lecture delivered at the Geographical Society by Mr. Thiselton Dyer, on " Plant-distribution as a field for geographical research," is printed in the Society's ' Proceedings ' for 1878 (vol. xxii., No. 6). Dr. D. Moore, of Glasnevin, has described in the Scientific Proceedings of the Boyal Dublin Society a supposed new Cerato- zamia, C. fusca-riridis. The specimen is in the collection at Glasnevin, came from Havanna, and is said to be native of Cuba. It is nearly aUied to C. longifolium, Eegel, but differs from the description of that species in its globose stem and very long recurved leaves with the leaflets fuscous-brown beneath. From Mr. Roper's notes on the additions to the Fauna and Flora of the Cuckmere district (Sussex) during 1878, it is gratifying to see that no less than 135 fresh species of plants have been found, thii-ty-one being Phanerogams. The great ' Flora Brasiliensis ' has made very rapid progress this year. Another part is to hand, Fasc. 97, dated 1st September, and containing the second portion of the Graminecc worked out by NOTICES OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. 381 Doell. Gymnopogon fastigiatus, Nees, is made a new genus, MonocJuHe, allied to Leptochloa, but diffeiing in its fewer flowers'. There are forty-three plates. Other New Books.— F. Hegelmaier, ' VergleichendQ Untersu- chungen liber Entwicklung dicotyledoner lieime.' Stuttgart, Schweizerbart, 1878 (8 mk.)—R. Nordlinger, ' Querschnitte von Hundert Holzarten,' Bd. viii. Stuttgart, Cotta, 1878 (5 mk.)— ToDARO, ' Eelazione suUa cultura dei Cottoni in Italia, sequita da una Monografia del genere Gossypium.' Eome and Palermo, 1877-8 (with 12 folio plates).— Mrs. Lankester 'Talks about Plants, or early lessons in Botany.' Grifiith and Farrar, 1879. Articles in Journals. — October, 1878. Botanische Zeitung. — B. Frank, ' On some parasitic Fungi causing leaf-staining diseases.' — Scharlok, ' On the flowers of Collomia.' — K. Goebel, ' On root-shoots of Anthurmm longifolium,.' — M. Traube, ^ On the mechanical theory of cell-growth and the history of the theory.' Flora. — A. de Krempelhuber, 'Lichenes coll. in republ. Argen- tina a Lorentz et Hieronymus.' — F. de Thuemen, ' Symbolae ad floram mycologicam Austrahae,' ii. — M. Gandoger, ' Piosse novae Galliae' (continued). — W. Nylander, ' Circa Lichenes Corsicanos adnotationes.' — W. J. Behrens, ' Anatomico-physiological investiga- tions on the nectaries of flowers.' — A. Borzi, 'Supplement to morphology and biology of Nostochacece.' Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. — W. 0. Focke, ' A case of inefficiency of certain pollen.' — J. Hinterhuber, ' Typhaminima, Hoppe.' — Schulze, * Mycological notes.' — F. Hauck, ' Note on FJiizophydium Dicksonii.' — J. Dedecek, ' Short excursion to Jeschken and Mileschauen in N. Bohemia.' — E. F. Solla, 'Flora of neighbourhood of Gorz ' (continued). — S. Schunk, • Flora of Val d'Agordo and Val di Fassa.' Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. — G. Archangeli, ' On Fistulina hepatica' (tab. 11). — G. Bertoloni, ' Further observations on the disease " falchetto " of the mulberry ' (tab. 12). American Xatiiralist. — W. J. Beal, ' How thistles spin.' — E. Palmer, ' Plants used by the Indians of the United States ' (con- tinued). BtiU. Soc. Bot. France (xxiv., 3). — Boulay, ' A new eradicator for collecting aquatics ' (tab. 7). — M. Cornu, ' Development of Agaricus cirrhatns from a sclerotium.' — Lefevre, ' Eeproductions of Eubus by implantation of extremity of leafy shoot.' — P. Petit, ' Can desiccation kill Diatoms ? ' — Viaud-Grandmarais and Menier, ' Botany of He d'Yeu, Vendee.' — Beauregard, ' Structure and development of fruit of Daphne' (tab. 10).— P. Duchartre, ' Obser- vations on double flowers of Lilies, especially of L. tigrlnum.' 382 BOTANICAL NEWS. Botanical Nttos. We are sorry to record the death of James McNab, the well- knowu curator of the Edmbiirgh Botanical Gardens, which occurred on November 20th in his 69th year. He succeeded his father in the care of the gardens in 1848. As a practical gardener of the highest order, Mr. McNab was probably almost without a rival : his botanical acquirements were also extensive and earned him the distinction in 1872 of being elected President of the Edinburgh Botanical Society, of which he was one of the original members. In 1834 he paid a visit to Canada and the United States, making considerable collections, some of the results of which he published in the ' Transactions of the Botanical Society,' the * Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine,' &c. He w^as the author of numerous j)apers on botany, gardening, and arbori- culture, and paid especial attention to climatology. His son, Dr. W. K. McNab is Professor of Botany in the Eoyal College of Science at Dublm. The Eev. Gteorge Henslow contemplates printing a Catalogue of British Plants, arranged accordibg to Hooker's ' Students' Flora.' Any person wishing for coj)ies is requested to communicate with him at 6, Titchfield Terrace, Kegent's Park, S.W. INDEX Aceras anthropopliora, 306 Acetabularia mediterranea, De Bary and Strasburger on, 56 Acrostichum tenerum, 302 Adinandra Millettii, 9 Alton's 'Hortus Kewensis', 283 Amaryllidaceae, two new genera from Cape Colony, 74 ; a new key to the genera of, 161 ; new, of the Welwitsch and Schweinfurth expeditions, 193 Ancrumia, 31, 147 Anisoptera sp. nov., 99 Anoiganthiis, 76 Anthericum monophyUiim, 324 ; Oatesii, 324; superpositum, 324 Anthoxanthum Puehi, 251 Apodolirion, 74 ; Bolusii, 75 ; Buchanani, 75 ; Mackenii, 75 Apothecaries' Society, prizes for girls . at, 95, 255 ; award of medals by, 288 Arctium nemorosum in Ireland, 212 Ai'gyi'othamnia cantonensis, 14 Aristolochia Ksempferi, 233 ; longi- foha, 289 Aroideae of Kew Gardens, 253 Arum italicum in Cornwall, 248 Asplenium micropterum, 300 ; septentrionale in Devon, 22 Aster turbinatus, 132 Atriplex sinuata, 216 Babington, C. C, on Eanuuculus tripartitus, 38; Notes on Eubi, 85, 114, 142, 175, 207 ; on Caltha radicans, 178; on Euphorbia palustris and E. pilosa, 377 Baker, J. G., on the rediscovery of the genus Eustephia of Cavan- illes, 39; on two new genera of Amaryllidaceae from Cape Colony, 74; new Compositae fi'om Monte Video, 77 ; enume- ration and classification of Hip- peastrum, 79 ; a new key to the genera of Amaryllidaceae, 161 ; on the new Amarylhdaceae of the Welwitsch and Schweinfurth expeditions (tab. 197), 193; synopsis of the species of Diaphoranthema, 236; list of Balansa's Ferns of Paraguay, 299; descriptions of new and little known Lihaceae, 321 ; elected F.K.S., 192 Balansa's Ferns of -Paraguay, list of, 299 Balfour, I. B., on some points in the morphology of Halophila, 290 Balfourodeudron, 147 Ball, J., on disputed points in botanical nomenclature, 140 Barbarea stricta in Middlesex, 347 Bassia latifolia, uses of, 126 Beccari, 0., appointed Director of Botanical Garden at Florence, 288 Beccari's ' Malesia,' 223 Bennett, A. W., on the structure and affinities of Characeae, 202; Conspectus Polygalarum Euro- paearum, 241, 266 Bentley and Trimen's ' Medicinal Plants,' 187 Berks, Gentiana germanica in, 266 Blepharocarya, 254 Boswellia, species of, 60 Boulger, G. S,, on the placenta of Primulaceae, 303 Brachytropis, 281 Braithwaite, E., on Eiccia spuria, Dicks., 55 Braun, A., his herbarium, 96 Briggs, T. E. A. , notes on the flora of the extreme south of Devon, 293 British Museum, Eeport of Botan- ical Department for 1877, 179 Britten, J., Polygala calcarea in Bucks, 54 ; Flora of Lake Lanca- shire, 88; Barbarea stricta in Middlesex, 347 884 INDEX. Bromns Benekenii, 252 Bucks, Polygala calcarea in, 54 Bupliane angolensis, 196 Burmannia cselestis, 111 Caesalpinia Sappan, 10 Callitriche obtusangula, 20 Caltlia radicans, 178 Capparis flexicaulis 225 Cardamine bracteata, 130; cheli- domoides, 130 Cardiostigma, 148 Carex Boenningliauseniana, 218 capillaris in Gordale, 247 digitata in Derbyshire, 248 Eoyleana, 233 ; tristachys, 233 xantliocarpa, 251 Carruthers, W., Eeport of Botanical Department of British Museum for 1877, 179 Caruel, T., on the place of Cha- raceas in the Natm-al System, 258 Caruel's ' MorfologiaVegetale,' 186 Castanopsis mitifica, 200; Scheff- eriana, 200 • Casual plants in Northampton- shii-e, 377 Celakovsky on the ovule of Trifohum repens, 89 Celastrus Walhchiana, 226 Centaurea ebenoides, 133 ; Jacea in Sussex, 178 Cephalotus follicularis, stmcture of pitcher of (tab. 193), 1 Ceratophyllum, movements of, 157 Ceratozamia fusca-vhidis, 380 Choetoceras armatum, 378 Chara connivens in Hants, 120 Characeae, A. W. Bennett on the structure and affinities of, 202 ; Caruel on, 258 ; Vines on, 355 Cheilanthes recurvata, 299 China, new and rare plants from, 1, 103, 225 ; destmction of forests in, 7 ; plants collected in, by Everard, 137; new species of Sheareria, 257 ; Aristolochia longifoha, 289 Chlorochytrium Cohnii, 30 Chlorophj^tum . cihatum, 325 ; longipes, 325; madagascariense, 326; micranthum, 325; poly- stachys, 326; pusillum, 325; suffruticosum, 326 Choanephora, conidial fructifica- tion of, 191 Christie, A. Craig, Scotch localities, 88 ; Molinia cserulea, as a paper- material, 346 Chrysanthemum oreastrum, 108 Clarke, C. B., his Indian herbarium 249 Cleistogamous plants, 123 Clematis Stronachii, 103 Coinochlamys, further note on, 139 CoUetia cruciata and C. spinosa, 62 Compositae, structiu'e of (tab. 194), 33; new, from Monte Video, 77 Cooke & Quelet's ' Clavis synoptica Hymenomycetum Europaeorum,' 351 Cornwall, Arum italicum in, 248 Corylaceae, new Malayan, 198 Crepin, Guide du Botaniste en Belgique, 26 Crinum ammocharoides, 195 ; buphanoides, 195 ; fimbriatulum, 196 ; pauciflorum, 195 ; vanillo- dorum, 196 Cryptogramma gracilis, 113 Cryptostephanus densiflorus, (tab. 197), 193 Cyathodium aureonitens, 55 ; spurium, 55 Cyperus Wightii, 14 Cyrtanthus Welwitschii, 197 Cystopteris montana, 15 Dabeocia polifoHa introduced to Hants, 61 Darwin, C, elected to French Academy, 288 DeCandoUe, Alph., on Botanical nomenclatm-e, 345 DeCandolle, Alph. and Cas., ' Mo- nographiae Phanerogamarum, vol. 1, 309 Dendrobium chloropterum, (tab. 196), 137 De Notaris, his herbarium, 96 Derbyshh-e, Carex digitata in, 248 Devon, notes on places of south- east, 15 ; on flora of the extreme south of, 292 Diaphoranthema,, synopsis of spe- cies of, 236; andicola, 239; j bryoides, 236 ; capillaris, 238 ; ! erecta, 239 ; fusca, 240 ; Gilhesii, i 240 ; myosura, 240 ; propinqua, 237 ; pusilla, 237 ; rectangula, 238 ; recurvata, 239 ; retorta, 238 ; tricholepis, 237 ; undulata, 240 ; i uniflora, 239 ! Dichelachne sciurea, 327 ! Dickson, A., on the structure of the pitcher of Cephalotus folli- cularis (tab. 193), 1 i Dionasa, 178 INDEX. 385 Dipcadi filifolimn, 322; lanceola- tum, 322 Dipelta, 58 Diplocyatlia, 319 Dipsacus Fullonum, use of fasciated stems of, 94 Dipterocarpese of New Guinea, 93, 98 Drosera rotundifolia, F. Darwin on nutrition of, 94 Druce, G. C., Eosa mollis in Northamptonshire, 25 ; Aceras anthropophora in Northampton- shire, 306 ; casual plants of Northamptonshire, 377 Dryobalanops Schefferi, 101 Dyer, W. T. Thiselton, Parinarium dillenifohum, 25 ; on the Dipter- ocarpeae of New Guinea, &c., 98, elected Examiner at University of London, 192 Eichler, Prof., appointed to Berhn, 63 Eichleria, 72, 145 (=Mmiea) Elatine inaperta, 157 ; American species of, 187 Ellacombe's ' Plant-lore & Garden craft of Shakespeare,' 351 Engler, Prof., appointed to Kiel, 160 Epilobium lanceolatum, 295 Eriocaulon echinulatum, 14 Erodium moschatum, authority for name, 261, 282 Erythrsea littoralis, 88 Eugenia BuUockii, 227 Eupatorium Ai-echavaletae, 78 ; stsechadosmum, 228 Euphorbia pilosa at Bath, 377 Eustephia, on the rediscovery of, 39 Everard, C. W., plants collected in China by, 137 Exchange Club, extracts from Keport for 1876, 182, 212, 251 Exocarya, 149 Fatoua japonica, 232 Fawcett, W., Lathyi'us hii'sutus in Kent, 247 Fertihzation of flowers, A. S. Wil- son on, 314 ; of some orchids, 123 Field, H. C, Notes on New Zea- land Ferns, 363 Field and Semple's ' Memoirs of the Botanic Gardens at Chelsea,' 379 Flemingia Lamontii, 10 Fragaria coUina, 11 Franchet, A., Sur une nouvelle espece de Shaereria (tab. 198), 257 Fritillaria Grayana, 263 ; obhqua, 323; Khodocanakis, 323 Gardenia Kalbreyeri (tab. 195), 97 Garuleum album, 133 Gentian, on an Isle of Wight, 263 Gentiana Amarella, 263, 265 ; campestris, 264 ; germanica, 265 ; uliginosa, 265 Glasspoole, H. G., on Chaetoceras ai-matum, 378 ; on Urtica piluh- fera, 378 Glaziouvia, 32 Gray, A, on Scirpus supinus, 346 ; elected to French Academy, 288 Groves, H. and J., Chara connivens in Kent, 120 ; Eosa sepium in Surrey, 121 Gymnadenia Pinguicula, 135 Gymnogramme longipes, 301 Habenaria plectomaniaca, 136 ; stylites, 136 Hsemanthus angolensis, 194 ; fili- florus, 194 Halophila, some points in the morphology of, 290 Hampe, Dr., his herbarium, 179 Hance, H. F., Spicilegia Flor® Sinensis I, 1 ; II, 103 ; III, 225 ; on the genus Pygeum , 87 ; on some new Malayan Corylaceae, 198 ; on Lysimachia cuspidata, BL, and L. cuspidata, Klatt, 234 , on Aristolochia longifolia, 289 ; two new species of Shorea, 302 ; on a new Indian oak, with re- marks on two other species, 327 Hanstein, * Die Parthenogenesis der Ccelebogyne,' 55 Hants, Dabeocia longifolia intro- duced to, 61 ; Chara connivens in, 120 ; Eumex maximus in, 305 Hartog, M. M., on the floral sti*uc- ture and afiinities of Sapotaceae, 65, 145 Heer on fossil plants of Arctic expedition, 59 Heliotropium brevifolium, 230 Hemsley, W. B., Centam-ea Jacea in Sussex, 178 Henfrey's ' Elementary Course of Botany,' 3rd edition by M. T. Masters, 285 3d 886 INDEX. Heracleum Moellendorfl&i, 12 Hesperoxipliion, 150 Heteraclme, 31, 150 Hieracium Dewari, 213 Hieru, W. P., on a question of Botanical nomenclature, 72 ; on a new species of Gardenia from west Tropical Africa (tab. 195), 97 Hillliouse's ' Bedfordshii-e Plant- list for 1876,' 57 Hillliouse, W., appointed Assistant curator of Cambridge herbarium, 192 Hippeastrum, enumeration and classification of, 79; francisca- num, 82 ; Jamesoni, 83 Holmes, E. M., Cryptogamic Flora of Kent, Hepaticae, 43 : Lichens, 117, 209, 329, 373 Holmes' ' Botanical Note-book,' 286 Hooker's ' Student's Flora of the British Islands,' 2nd edition, 386 Hopea phillippinensis, 100 ; sp. nov., 100 Hymenial-gonidia of Lichens, 27 Hypericum linariifolium, 17 Icacineae, new genera of, 223 Im Thurm, E., appointed Cm-ator of Brit. Guiana Museum, 255 Indigofera Wynbergensis, 131 Isoetes from Lough Bray, 318, 353 ; Morei (tab. 199), 353; setacea, 354 Jamieson on respiration of plants, 312 Japan, plants collected by Bisset in, 129 ; vegetation of Fusi, 179 Jenner, J. H. A., on Sibthorpia em-opsea, 283; on Rimiex max- imus, 305 Jennmgs, S., appointed assistant- Secretaiy to R. Horticultm-al Society, 63 Journals, articles in : — American Journ. Microsc, 32 American Naturalist, 158, 188, 254, 287, 352, 381 Ann. des So. Nat., 31, 92, 224, 287, 313 Belgique, Bull. Soc. Bot. de, 32, 224 Botanische Zeitung, 31, 59, 92, 124, 158, 188, 224, 255, 287, 312, 352, 381 Bot. Notiser, 32, 59, 92, 124, 188, 224, 352 Bot. Tidskrift, 31, 188 Cohn's Beitrage, 58 Edinburgh, Trans. Bot. Soc, 92 Flora, 31, 59, 92, 124, 158, 188, 224, 255, 287, 312, 352, 381 France, Bull. Soc. Bot. de, 82, 124, 224, 381 GrevHlea, 158, 254, 352 Hedwigia, 31, 124, 158, 188, 224, 287, 313 Ital.,nuoYO Giorn. Bot., 92, 188, 287, 381 Linnaea, 58, 124 Linn. Soc. Lond., Trans. 124 Linn. Soc. Lond., Journ., 32, 92, 124, 255, 287 Magyar Nov. Lapok, 31, 92, 124, 158, 188, 255, 313, 352 Midland Naturahst, 188 Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr., 31, 59, 92, 124, 158, 188, 224, 254, 287, 313, 352, 381 Pringsheim's Jahrbucher, 58 Quart. Journ. Micr. Science, 92 Revue Internat. des Sciences, 92 Scottish Natm-ahst, 92, 187, 287 Silliman's Amer. Journ., 92, 352 Juncus Hancockii, 111 Justicia fittonioides, 134 Kanitz's 'Anthophyta quae in Japonia legit S. Weiss,' 379 Kent, Hepaticae of, 43 ; Lichens of, 117, 209, 329, 346; Lathyrus hhsutus in, 247 Kerner, A., appointed Director of Bot. Gardens at Vienna, 288 Kew Gardens, earher opening of, 128 Kew, Report for 1877 of the Herbarium at, 248 Kienitz-Gerloff, on the develop- ment of the capsule in Mosses, 218 Klattia, 150 Kuntze's ' Die Schutzmittel der Pflanzen, &c.,' 121 Km-z's ' Forest-flora of British Burma,' 283 ; Labourdonnaisia, 71 LachenaHa Wrightii, 322 Lamium petiolatum, 232 Lamprothamnus, 150 Lancaslm-e, Flora of Lake, 88 Lanessan, J. L., Translation of Fluckigerand Hanbmy's 'Phar- macographia,' 29 INDEX. 387 Lathyrus birsutus in Kent, 247 Leefe, J. E., on Salix Trevirani, 41 Lees, F. A., Carex capillaris in Gordale, 247 Lettsomia Clialmersii, 230 Leviera, 223 L'Heritier, his ' Geraniologia brevior,' 282 Lichens, development of, 27 ; subalpine, in Kent, 332 "Limamea," 190 Lissochilus Wakeiieldi, 137 Lysimachia cuspidata, 234 ; Klatt- iana, 236 Marupa, 190 Massonia calvata, 321 ; orientahs, 321 Masters, M. T., Side-hghts on the structure of Composites, (tab. 194), 33 ; note on the dimorphism of Kestiaceae (tab. 194), 36 Mathews, W., on Botanical nomen- clature, 260 McNab's 'Class-book of Botany', 221 Medicago lappacea, 105, Menispermace8e,new genera of, 223 Meyenia erecta, fertilization of, 190 Middlesex, localities in, 347 Moisture, influence of atmospheric, on vegetation, 90 Molinia caerulea as a material for paper, 347 Monochsete, 381 Moore, D., on a nev7 species of Isoetes from Ireland (tab. 199), 353 Moore, S. le M., Alabastra diversa, II, 129 ; Further note on Coin- ochlamys, 138 ; on Dionaea, 178 Morris, D,, appointed Assistant to Director of Bot. Gardens, Ceylon, 255 Moss-capsule, development of, 218 Mucorineae, Van Tieghem on the, 154 Mueller, F. von, on the genus Phyllachne, 173; on Stipa micrantha of Cavanilles, 327 Mueller, Baron F. v. ' Botanic Teachings at the schools of Victoria,' 26 Muriea, 145 Nan-mu tree of Yunnan, 60 Nepeta Everardi, 135 New Books :— 31, 58, 92, 124, 158, 187, 223, 254, 287, 312, 351, 381 New genera and species of Phaner- ogamous plants pubiished in 1877, 145 Nomenclature, botanical, W. P. Hiern on, 72 ; J. Ball on, 140 ; H. Trimen on, 170 ; W. Matthews on, 260 ; Alph. DeCandolle on, 345 Northamptonshu-e, localities in, 25, 306, 377 Notochlaena Balansas, 301 Nyman's * Conspectus Florae Euro- paeae, 347 Obituary : — Anderson, S., 64 Bloxam, A., 96 Borszczow, E., 256 Correa de Mello, J., 95 Du Mortier, B. C, 255 Durieu de Maisonneuve,M.C.,128 Fries, E. M., 95 Hodgson, Ehz., 64 Jaeger, A., 160 Kurz, S., 127 Langethal, C. E., 320 Lawson, H., 32 McNab, J., 382 Monteho, J. J., 128 Murray, A., 63 Olney, S. S., 320 Pfeiffer, L., 32 Easpail, F. V.. 96 Salwey, T., 63 Schur, P. J. F., 256 Seubert, M., 160 Swinhoe, E., 96 Thomson, T., 160 Thozet, A., 320 Visiani, K. de, 192 "WaUis, G., 288 Zanardini, G., 256 (Enothera fruticosa in China, 107 Oldenlandia alata, 12 Ohnieae, Decaisne on afi&nities of, 184 Oliver, D., 'Flora of Tropical Africa,' vol. Ill, 30 Ornithogalum haworthioides, 322 Ovule, nature of, 89 Pachira, germination of, 191 Psederia tomentosa, 228 Palms, new genera of, 28 Pappus, nature of, 34 Paraguay, ferns from, 299 Parinarium dillenifolium, 25 ; Wal- lichianum, 102 388 INHEX. Parnassia oreophila, 106 Parodi's ' Contribuciones a la Flora del Paraguay,' 29 Parthenogenesis in Coelebogyne, Hanstein on, 56 Passiflora hainanensis, 227 Pedicino, M., appointed Professor at Eome, 288 Pedicnlaris longifolia, 13, 234 Peronosporites antiquarius, 62 Pliyllaclme, on the genus, 173 Plagiosetum, 31, 152 Pogonatimi alpinuni, monstrosity of, 59 Polygala, Conspectus of European species of, 241, 266; alpestris, 268 ; amara, 268 ; anatohca, 274 ; angustifolia, 266; calcarea, 52, 267; chamaebuxus, 280; var. rhodoptera, 281 ; ciliata, 246 , comosa,271; dubia,245; dunen- sis, 246 ; elegans, 277; flavescens, 272 ; forojulensis, 269 ; glumacea, 275 ; japonica, 277 ; major, 273 ; microphylla, 281 ; monspeliaca, 275 ; nicaeensis, 270, 274 ; Preshi, 270 ; rosea, 270, 274 ; rupestris, 278 ; saxatilis, 279 ; sibirica, 277; Bubuniflora, 278; supina, 276; uUginosa, 269 ; venulosa, 272 ; vulgaris, 244; var. Caruehana, 266 Polygonum tenuicaule, 135 Polypodiimi paraguayense, 301 Potentilla argentea in Devon, 19 Primula modesta, 134 Primulacese, on the placenta of, 303 Purchas, W. H., on Rubus Purchasii, 305 Pteroglossaspis, 380 Pygeum, on the genus, 87 Quercus Andersoni, 199 ; disco- carpa, 201 ; Griffithii, 328 ; Kurzii, 328 ; Rajah, 198 ; rhioen- sis, 198 ; semiserrata, 328 ; scyphigera, 199 Rain tree of Moyobamba, 94 Ranunculus tripartitus, as British, 38 ; triphyllos, 182 Reichenbach, H. G., fil., a new species of Fritillaria, 262 Reichenbach's ' Otia Botanica Hamburgensia,' 380 Restiaceae, on the dimorphism of ^tab. 194), 36 Re^dews: — Guide du botaniste en Belgique. Par F. Crepin, 26 Introduction to Botanic Teach- ings at the schools of Victoria. By Baron F. v. Mueller, 26 Beitrage zur Entwickelungsges- chichte der Flechten, II. Von E. Stahl, 27 Ann ales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg, vol I. Par R. H. C. C. Scheffer, 28 Recherches sur les Organes de la Vegetation du Selaginella Martensii. Par M. Treub, 29 Histoire des Drogues d'Origine Vegetale. Par F. A. Fliickiger and D. Hanbury ; trad, par J. L. Lanessan, 29 Contribuciones a la Flora del Paraguay. By D. Parodi, 29 Flora of Tropical Africa. By D. Oliver and others, vol. III., 30 Die Parthenogenesis der Coeleb- ogyne ilicifolia. Von J. Han- stein, 55 Acetabularia mediterranea. Von A. de Bary & E. Strasburger,56 Bedfordshire Plant-hst for 1876. By W. Hillhouse, 57 Libellus de re herbaria novus. By Wilham Turner ; reprinted by B. D. Jackson, 89 A catalogue of the collections in the Museum of the Pharma- ceutical Society. By E. M. Holmes, 90 Die Schutzmittel der Pflanzen gegen Thiere und AVetterun- gunst, &c. Von 0. Kuntze, 121 Troisieme memoire sur les Mu- corinees. Par P. Van Tieghem, 154 Die Pilze des Weinstockes. Von G. F. V. Thiimeu, 155 Sur les caracteres et atfinites des Oliniees. Par J. Decaisne, 184 Bibliographical Index to North American Botany. By S. Watson, 185 La Morfologia Vegetale. Esposta da T. Camel, 186 Botany. By W. R. MacNab, 221 The Clydesdale Flora. By the late R. Hennedy, 222 Forest Flora of British Burma. By S. Kurz, 283 INDEX. On the Apocynacese of South America. By J. Miers, 284 An Elementary Course of Botany. By A. Henfrey, ed. 3, by M. T. Masters, 285 Botanical Note-book. By E. M. Holmes, 286 The Student's Flora of the British Islands. By Sir J. D. Hooker, 2nd edition, 306 The Organic Constituents of Plants and Vegetable Sub- stances. By G. C. Wittstein, translated by Baron von MueUer, 308 Monographiae Phanerogamarum. Auct. Alph. et Casimir De CandoUe, vol. I., 309 Conspectus Florae Europaeae. Auctore C. F. Nyman. Part 1, 347 Clavis synoptica Hymenomy- cetum europaeorom. By M. C. Cooke and L. Quelet, 350 The Plant-lore and Garden-craft of Shakespeare. By Eev. H. N. Ellacombe, 351 Memoirs of the Botanic Garden at Chelsea. By the late H. Field and R. H. Semple, 379 Anthophyta quae in Japonia legit E. Weiss. Enum. A. Kanitz, 379 Otia Botanica Hambm-gensia. auct. H. G. Eeichenbach, fil., 380 Rhizophydium Dicksonii, 30 Rhynchosia clivorum, 131 Riccia spuria, Dickson, 55 Rogers, W. M,, Notes on some South-east Devon plants, 15 Rosa hibernica, var. Grovesii, 183 ; microcarpa, 106 ; molhs in Northamptonshire, 25 ; sepium in SmTey, 121 ; virginea in Hants, 212 Rubi, notes on, 85, 114, 142, 175,207 Rubiaceae, two kinds of dimorph- isms in, 319 Rubus adornatus, 177 ; BagnaUii, 175 ; Bakeri, 114 ; Briggsii, 175 ; cavatifolius, 144 ; diversifolius, 144 : emersistylus, 175 ; festivus, 116 ; glandulosus, 207 ; lietero- clitus, 208 ; horrefactus, 209 ; im- bricatus, 86 ; Leesii, 85 ; longi- thyrsiger, 177 ; mucronulatus, 115; mutabilis, 144 ; obliquus, 143 ; paradoxus, 132 ; piletosta- chys, 114 ; Purchasii, 208, 305 ; pygmaeus, 142 ; Reuteri, 208 ; rubicolor, 116; Salteri, 114; saltuum, 177 ; suberectus, 86 ; triphyllus, 105 ; Warrenii, 115 Ruellia arvensis, 135 Rumex maximus in Sussex and Hants, 305 ; rupestris, 298 ; sylvestris in Scotland, 217 Sabia Bullockii, 9 Sageretia rugosa, 9 Salix Trevirani as British, 41 Sanicula lamelligera, 11 Sapotaceae, on the floral structure and affinities of, 65 Saussurea iodostegia, 109 Saxifraga serpyllifolia, 106 Scaevola hainanensis, 229 Scheffer, 'Annales du Jardin Bot. de Buitenzorg,' 28 Schweinfurth, New Amaryllidaceae collected by, 193 Schwendener, Prof., appointed to Berhn, 160 Scilla autumnahs in Essex, 346 ; spicata, 323 Scu-pus acicularis, 298 ; supinus, subradical flowers of, 346 Scotland, locahties in, 88 Serophularia Scorodonia, 296 Scyphochlamys, 152 Selaginella, mode of growth in, 29 Senebiera didyma, inflorescence of, 317 Senecio vernalis at Cork, 252 Shaereria Polii (tab. 198), 257 Shorea Pierrei, 302 ; Schefferiana, 303 ; sublacunosa, 102 Shut tie worth, R. J., his herbarium, 179 Sibthorpia europaea, new localities in Sussex, 283 Societies : — British Association, meeting at Plymouth 1877, 69 ; at Dublin 1878, 313 French Association for advance- ment of the Sciences, 319 Linnean Society of London, 60, 93, 126, 159, 188, 318; election of Foreign members of, 190 Sorauer on influence of moist aii on vegetation, 90 Spergularia marina, stipules of, 316 Sphenostigma, 153 390 INDEX. Stahl's * Beitrage z. Entwickel- uiigsgeschichte der Fiecliteu,' part II, 27 Stapeliae of Thimberg's lierbarium, 319 Statice bahusiensis in Cheshire, 253 Stenachaenium campestre, 79 ; Kiedelii, 78 Stipa micrautha of Cavanilles, 327 Stratton, F., on an Isle of Wight Gentian, 203 Sugar, amount of in nectar of flowers, 315 Suspensor, on the homologies of the, 156 Sussex, Centaui'ea Jacea in, 178 ; new localities for Sibthorpia europaea in, 283 Swartzia amazonica, 132 Symphytum asperrimum, 252 ; uplandicum, 253 Tanulepis, 153 Teucrium Botrys, new locality for, 378 Thalictrum Fortunei, 130 Thermopsis chinensis, 131 Thumen's 'Pilze des Weinstockes,' 155 Traquau'ia, WilUamson on, 313 Tree-ferns of New Zealand, 364 Treub, ' Orgaues de la vegetation du Selaginella,' 29 Trichlora, 31, 153 Trichocaulon, 319 Tricoilocaryon Barnardi, 312 Trimen, H., on a point in botanical nomenclature, 170 ; Arum ital- icum in Cornwall, 248 ; Carex digitata in Derbysliii-e, 248 ; on some spring-flowering Gentians, 265 ; on Erodium moschatum, 282 ; Middlesex plants, 347 Tulbaghia Cameroni, 321 Tm'ner's ' Libellus de re herbaria novus,' reprint of by B. D. Jackson, 89 Uncinula spiralis, 30 Urginea rigidifolia, 323 Urtica pilulifera, 378 Van Tieghem's Third memou' on the Mucorineae, 154 Vargas, J. M., account of, 91 Vargasia, 91 Vateria seychellarum, 103 Vatica papuana, 100 ; lancesefoha, 101 Vernonia pterocaulon, 77 Vine, Fungi of, 155 Vines, S. H., on the proembryo of Chara, 355 Vitis papillata, 226 Wallace, A. E., Scilla autumnalis in Essex, 346 Warner, F. I., Note on Kent Lichens, 346 Watson's ' Bibliographical Index to North American Botany,' 185 Welwitsch, Dr., New AmaryUida- ceae collected by, 193 Wikstroemia Monula, 13 Wilhamson on Traquama, 313 Wistaria, production of seed in, 159 Wittstein and Mueller's ' Organic Constituents of Plants and vegetable substances,' 308 Wright (Perceval) on parasitic algae, 30 Zannichellia polycarpa, 218 EREATA ET CORRIGENDA. 891 ERRATA ET CORRIGENDA. Page 11, line 11, for " Sia," read Saio. 12 13 from bottom, /or " wa," read wu. 13 20 „ for " uri," read wu. 14 21 „ for "E," read £. 14 14 „ for " Machuria," read Manchuria. 81 11 „ for " Corinthia," read Carinthia. 129 7, for •' acceduntur," read accedunt. 150 20, /or " RODRiQUESiANA," read rodriguesiana. 215, 21G (in the July number) are cancelled; the leaf to be substituted is inserted at the end of August number. 223 23, for " temniscata," read lemniscata. 224 12, /or " Niesse," read Niessl. 224 15, /or •' Holnby," read Holuby. 224 12 from bottom, /or "New," read near. 243 ''^tfor "longiores," read breviores. 287 15 from bottom, /or "S." read F. 318 25 „ after " losetes," insert lacustris. 318 2 „ after " Rubiacece," insert by C. 13. Clarke. 320 2 „ for "3," read 2 320 18 „ after " Scirpus," add and in a genus of Leguminosce. Directions for jjlcicing the Plates. Tab. 193 to face page 5 33 194 195 196 197 198 199 138 197 258 355 .'EST, NEWilAN AND CO., PRINTERS, 54, HATTON GAKDT.N, LONDON, E.G. 5185 00265 05