M^'Z ^ibrarn of i^t Ulus^um OP COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, AT HARVARD COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, MASS. The gift of t: No, ii] JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, VOLUME IV— PART I. — a"XJ2^a■E loo-z. ^ PUBLICATION COMMITTEE: R. H. GRAVES, J. A. HOLMES, J. L. LOVE. PERMANENT SECRETARY: F. P. VENABLE, CHAPEL HILL, N. C. OFFICERS 1885-1886. President— THOMAS F. WOOD, M. D., Wilmington, N. C. Vice-President— J. A. HOLMES, B. Agr., Cha;pel Hill, N. C. Secretary and Treasurer— F. P. VENABLE, Ph. D. F. C. S., Chapel Hill, N. C. PUBLICATION COMMITTEE. J. W. GORE, C. E., W. B. PHILLIPS, Ph. D., J. L. LOVE, B. A. 1887-1888. President— R. H. LEWIS, M. D., Raleigh, N. C. Vice-President— W. L POTEAT, Wake Forest N. C Resident Vice-President— W. B. PHILLIPS, Ph. D., Chapel Hill, N. C. Permanent Secretary and Treasurer— F. P. VENABLE, Ph. D., Chapel Hill, N. C. Recording Secretary and Librarian — J. W. GORE, C. E.^ Chapel Hill, N. C. PUBLICATION COMMITTEE. R. H. GRAVES, C. & M. E., J. A. HOLMES, B. Agr., J. L. LOVE, B. A. TABLE OF CONTENTS. o Page. Officers 4 Keport of the resident Vice-President for the year 1886-87 5 Report of the Secretary 8 Treasurer's Report 12 A Sketch and Bibliography of Nicholas Marcellus Hentz 13 A New Trap-door Spider i 16 A Family of Young Trap-door Spiders 26 Some new Salts of Camphoric Acid 52 Decomposition of Potassium Cyanide 54 Lead Chlor-Sulpho-Cyanide 55 Solubility of Alumina in Sulphuric Acid 56 Analysis of Water from the Artesian "Well at Durham, N C 57 The Fertilizer Trade in North Carolina in 1886 58 List of Exchanges 66 JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society. REPORT OF THE RESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT FOR THE YEAR i886-'87. J. A. HOLMES. The Society has now completed the fourth year of its existence. And the result of its work during the past year, and of the three years preceding, afford the assurance that it may be now regarded as a permanent institution. Kind words of encouragement have come in from eminent sources; applications for the Journals of the Society have increased in number; the society has now on its exchange list Journals of many of the more prominent societies of the United States, and of several foreign societies; and there has been a steady improvement in the extent and character of the original in- vestigations being carried on by members of the Society. It is worthy of mention, too, that the system of public lec- tures which was inaugurated at the State University by this Society has been adopted by other institutions in this and adjacent States. And the Secretary of this Society has been in correspondence with gentlemen connected with other Southern institutions who intend organizing similar Societies. We may believe, then, that this humble beginning made here less than four years ago, is doing something to awaken a new activity in scientific work not only in our own State but also in other Southern States. The following summary will exhibit in a general way the 6 JOURNAL OF THE work of the Society during the past four years of its existence : 1883-'84 '84-'85 '80-86 '86-37 Totals Meetings, 6 5 8 9 28 Public Lectures, — 4 — 3 7 Papers presented 67 43 60 53 223 Papers published 98 100 148 150* 500 The above table shows a decrease in the number of papers presented; but there has been a decided improvement in the length and value of the papers, that has more than counter- balanced the falling off in number. The Journal for 1886 and 1887, which is to be published in two parts, will proba- bly contain more papers than is indicated above. A detailed statement would show more clearly the growth of the Society; but this can not be given here. But while the Society is making real advancement it is doing so under disadvantages. Its membership has not been increased as was hoped it would. The students and graduates of the University and odier institutions have not associated themselves with it, nor have taken part in its work as it was expected they might, and as it is hoped they will do in the future. Nor has the Society received the liberal finan- cial support which it needs to increase the publication of its Journals. The Society needs in every way a more generous support; and for this it must appeal to its members and all others interested in scientific work in the State. Among the present and pressing needs of the Society I may mention the following : (i) The hearty co-operation of a much larger number of persons in the State engaged in, or interested in, scientific work. All such should become members of the Society and co-operate with it in its work. (2) A more liberal financial support. During the past year for want of funds the Society was unable to publish several papers presented for publication in the Journal. Among the members of other Societies are often to be found men of wealth and liberality who contribute largely to the financial support of the Societies to which they belong, and have won the title of "patrons' of the Society A few mem- bers of the Mitchell Society have contributed liberally to its ' ' ■"■■ ■ ~' — — — - — — - — ■-■- ■ ■ ■ — ■ ■■ ■ ■ I ■ .pii . ..■ I.-. ■ ■.J *Jfumloer of pages^egtjmated— not yet published. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 7 financial support during the past year; and it is earnestly hoped that this membership will increase. {3) Contributions to the Library of the Society. During the past few months an encouraging beginning has been made in this direction, and it is hoped that much more will be accomplished during the coming year. The Society de- sires to collect together for preservation and reference, all books, pamphlets, manuscripts, maps, &c., that have any bearing upon the history, natural history, or resources of North Carolina, and any books, pamphlets, maps, &c., writ- ten by members of the Society, or workers in North Caro- lina. Already there has been collected together upwards of 400 such books, pamphlets and journals of other Societies. A system of public lectures was organized again during this year, and three lectures have been given. These will be continued during the next year under the* direction of the council. The Journal of the Society for i885-'86, published during the past year, was a pamphlet of 148 pages. The Journal for i886-'87 will be published in two parts of probably 76 pages each. Part I will be printed during the early summer. Part II will appear later in the year. As a continuation of the series of biographical sketches Part I of the Journal will contain a short sketch of Prof. Mar- cellus Hentz. Part II will contain a sketch of the late Prof. W. C. Kerr. The President of the Society, on account of ill health, has been unable to meet with the Society during the year; but in various ways he has given assistance and encouragement. During the year one death has occurred among the Life Members of the Society: Right Rev. Wm, M. Green, Bishop of Mississippi, and one among the regular members. Col. J. B. Wheeler. 8 JOURNAL OF THE REPORT OF THE SECRETARY. F. P. VENABLE. BUSINESS MEETINGS. August 28, 1886. Prof. Holmes in the chair. The date of the pubHc meet- ings was changed to the second Tuesday in each month. The condition of the Treasury was discussed and the Treas- urer was directed to advertise and place on sale the new Journals. October 15, 1886. Prof Holmes presided. It was directed that papers pre- sented before the Society be, as far as possible, on uniform paper, as to size at least, and that the Publication Committee take charge of the papers immediately after each meeting, deciding which are to be published and which placed on file, finally placing them in the hands of the Secretary. Arrangements were directed to be made for storing the books and pamphlets belonging to the Society where they would be convenient for reference. A Committee was appointed to take steps towards effect- ing an interchange of publications with other bodies having a like aim with this Society. May 7, 1887. Prof Holmes in the chair. The Secretary and Treasurer presented his reports. It was ordered that the monthly bulletins containing ab- stracts of papers read at the public meetings be issued also during the coming year. In view of this increase of the Secretary's duties and of the rapidly growing library of the Society the office of Record- ing Secretary and Librarian was created, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 9 By a vote of the Society the office of Corresponding Sec- retary was made permanent. To insure more rapid publication of the material on hand it was decided that hereafter the Journal be published in two semi-annual parts. The following officers for 1887- 1888 were then elected: President — Dr. R. H. Lewis, Raleigh, N C. Vjce-Presidents— Prof. W. L Poteat, Wake Forest College, and Dr. W. B. Phillips, Chapel Hill. Secretary and Treasurer — Dr. F. P. Venable, Chapel Hill. Recording Secretary — Prof. J. W. Gore, Chapel Hill. Publication Committee — Profs. Graves, Holmes and Love, Chapel Hill As Honorary members the following were elected : Major J. W. Powell, U. S. Geological Survey; Hon. S. F. Baird, Smith- Bonian Institution, and Dr. C, V. Riley, Department of Agriculture. As Corresponding members : Prof. E. E. Smith, University of Alabama; Dr. D. Day, U. 8. Geologi- cal Survey; Dr. J. M. McBryde, University of South Carolina, and Prof. W. J. McGee, U. S. Geological Survey. A number of regular members were also elected, a list of whom will appear in the second part of the Journal. PUBLIC MEETINGS. Natural History Lecture Room, XX. PUBLIC meeting. September 14, 1886. 1. Examination of certain North Carolina Clays, W. B. Phillips. 2 Treatment of Refractory Phosphates, W. B. Phillips. 3. Report on the last meeting of American Association for the Advancement of Science, J. W. Gore. 4. Report on recently Discovered Elements, F. P Vena'.le. 5. Report on Saccharine F. P. Venable. 6. New Instances of Protective Resemblance in Insects, G. F Atkinson^ 7. Report on a Recent Discovt-ry in Biology, G. F. Atkinson. XXI. PUBLIC meeting. November, 1886. 8. On the Parameter of a Plane, R. H. Graves and W. B. Phillips. 10 JOURNAL OF THE 9. Report on Arsenic as a Poison F. P. Venable- 10. A New Glow Worm, G. F. Atkinson 11. A singular occurrence of Cerusite, W. B. Phillips. 13. Report on Earthquakes occurring at Charleston, from 18th Century to present time, J. A. Holmes. xxri PUBLIC MEETING. November, 1886. 13 On Universal or Cosmic Time, J. L. Love. 14 A New Lamp for Laboratory Use, F. P. Venable. 15. A List of Minerals containing Phosphoric Acid W. B Phillips. 16. Subsidence along the Coast of New Jersey J, A Holmes. 17. Report on the Recession of Niagara Falls J. A. Holmes. XXI PUBLIC MEETING. December, 1886. 18. Solar Eclipses J. W. Gore. 19. External Signs of Lodes and Veins, W B. Phillips. 20. Report on the Isolation of Fluorine, F P Venable. 21. Ancient Mathematics, R H. G^raves. XXIV PUBLIC MEETING. January 25th, 1887. 22. Report on Isolation of Fluorine, (continued), F. P. Venable- 23. Utilization of Wool Grease, F. P. Venable. 24. Can an Air-bubble Function as an Organ of Respi- ration, G. F. Atkinson. 25. Classification of Ore Deposits, W. B. Phillips. 26. Rainfall Statistics for North Carolina, J. A. Holmes. XXV PUBLIC MEETING. iebmary Sih, 1887. 27. The True Source of the Mississippi, J. W Gore. 28. Nomenclature of Lodes. Beds and Veins, W. B. Phillips). 29. A New Insec Epid^-mic, G. F. Atkinson. 30. Report on Carbon Dioxide in the Air,, F. P. Venable. XXVI PUBLIC MEETING. March 8th, 1887. 31. Sepulchral and Perpetual Lamps, Dr. H. C Bolton. 32. A New Test for Iron, F. P. Venable. 33. A Madstone, W B. Phillips. 34 Reversion of Superphosphates when Bottled, W. B. P. illips, 35. Temperature Statistics for North Carolina, J. A. Holmes. XXVII PUBLIC MEETING. April I2th, 1887. 36. A Sarcoptid Mite G. F. Atkinson. 37. The New Glow Worm, G. F. Atkinson 38. Flowering of P ants in Ch;ipel Hill section, L. W. Lynch. 39. Eine Verschiebung, W. B. Phillips. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 1 1 40. Harnett County Fire Clay, W. B. Phillips. 41. Rf'port on the Evaporation of Water on Stoves, F. P. Venable. 42. Report on the "Genesis of the Elements," F. P. Venable. 43. Average Elevation and Rainfall of North Carolina,. . .J. A. Holmes. XXVIII PUBLIC MEETING. May lOf/?, 1887. 44. Hetero-somatism, W B Phi hps 45. Meteorology of Chapel Hill, J. W Gore. 46. Pr. liii.luary List of Butterflies of Chapel Hill, A, Braswell. 47. Notes on Protective Ri semblance in Butttrfiii s, F. M. Harper. 48 Notes on A, pie Blight, G. F. Atkinson. 49. Prulimi.-ary Li t of the Birds of Chapel Hill, G F. Atkinson. 50 Action of Chi rine Monoxide on Hixylen, R. G. Gris om. 51. Actr n of Haloizen Acids on Lead, Arsenate »nd I'h' sphates, H. F. Shaffner. 52 f^ome New Lead Salts, F. P. Venable. 53 Repor- s of Officers for 1886-1887. PUBLIC LECTURES. V— March 1, 1887. The R' sicrucians, F. P. Venable. VI— March 22, 1887. A Ske'ch of Mathematical and Physical Sciences from Ar- istarchu- to Hipparchut", li. H. Graves. VII —April 26, 1887. Galilei, J. W. Gore. 12 JOURNAL OF THE trp:asurer's report. F. P, VENABLE. Balance from October 1886 $ 85 57 Additional fees for 1886 25 00 Additional Journals sold 84 40 Special contributions 85 00 Fees collected for 1887 72 00 Printing of Journal | Postage Stationery Advertising Platps Freight and Expenses Total amount received 351 97 Total amount expended 284 92 Balance on hand iMay 15th 67 05 Amount due from members 56 00 Estimated sales of Journals 60 00 Estimated expeiises 250 00 231 85 21 92 4 50 1 55 22 50 2 60 It is evident from the above table that the estimated expenses run con- siderably beyond the probable income, and yet these expenses are placed at a much lower figure than for last year. It is therefore essential that special contributions reach the society's treasury in order that the work be maintained as heretofore. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 13 A SKETCH AND BIOGRAPHY OF NICHOLAS MARCELLUS HENTZ. N. M. Hentz was born in Versailles, July 25, 1797. To this place his flither, who was active in political affairs, had been obliged to flee from Paris, and conceal himself under an assumed name (Arnold). His son showed a remarkable talent for miniature painting while quite young, and attained considerable proficiency in this art. In 18 13 he entered the Hospital Val de Grace as a student in medicine, where he rem lined busied with his studies and duties as hospital as- sistant until the fall of Napoleon. At this time his %ther was proscribed and obliged to flee to America. The family, after their arrival in this country, spent a few weeks in New York City and Elizabeth Town, when they removed to Wilkesburg, Pa., the latter part of April, 1816. For some years Hentz was engaged in Philadelphia and Boston as teacher of French and miniature drawing. Fol- lowing this, for a short time he was tutor in the family of a weathy planter (Mr. Marshall) on Sullivan's Island, near Charleston, S. C. While engaged as a teacher in a school for boys at Round Hill, Northampton, Mass., he was married to Miss Caroline Lee Whiting, the daughter of Gen. John Whiting, of Lan- caster. His wife afterwards became well known as a poet and novelist. Soon after his marriage, in 1824, he moved to Chapel Hill, N. C, where he had charge of Modern Languages in the State University until 1830. From this time up to 1849, he was in charge of various female seminaries and academies in the South; at Covington, Ky., Cincinnati, O., Florence, Tuscaloosa, and Tuskegee, Ala., and Columbus, Ga. His health having failed, he moved to the residence of his son Charles, at Mariana, Florida; where he died Nov. 4, 1856. It is a remarkable fact that during his long life as a teacher he was one of the pioneers in American Entomology, and became during his time the highest authority on American Spiders. His life and work then are of special interest to the members of the Mitchell Society because of his connec- tion with the University of North Carolina. All of his leis- 14 JOURNAL OF THE ure hours, during his Hfe as a teacher, were devoted to these studies. He was an intimate friend and co-worker with the well known entomologist, Harris, as the publications of the Bos- ton Society of Natural History will testify. He was very fortunate in selecting the spiders as his special field of study, for little or nothing at that time had been pub- lished on North American Spiders. His time was given to the observation of their habits, and to the collection, descrip- tion and representation of the various species. He published a few papers in Silliman's Journal, and in the Journal of the Philadelphia Academy of Arts and Sciences, and then brought together his extensive series of notes and paintings, and offered them to the Boston Society of Natural History for publication in its Journal. The publication of these ex- tended over a number of years, A few years ago, as many of the publications were out of print, the Council of the So- ciety determined to republish, in a connected form, all of Hentz's arachnological writings. When this was done, a considerable number of notes and descriptions were added by Mr. J. H. Emerton, who has paid much attention to our na- tive spiders. A few notes were also added by Mr. Wm. E. Holden of Marietta, O. After Hentz's death, his collection of spiders went into the hands of the Boston Society, but has since been nearly de- stroyed.^ G. F. Atkinson. LIST OF THE WRITINGS OF PROF. HENTZ. 1821. A notice concerning the spider whose web is used in medicine {Tegenaria medic'inalis) Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., II., p. 53-55. 1825. Soma observations on the Anatomy and Physiology of the Alli- gator of North America. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc, II., pp. 216-338. 1835. Description of some new species of North American Insects. Jour. Phil. Acad. "Nat. Sci , V. pp 373-375. 1829. The same paper in Ferusac's Bulletin des Sciences Naturelles, XViri.,pp 475-476. 1830 Description of eleven new species of North American Insects. Trans. Amer. Soc, III,, pp. 253-258. *The Spiders of the United States by Nicholas Marcellus Hentz, M. D. Occasional Papeis of the Boston Society of Natural History, II, Preface ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 15 1830. Remarks on the use of the Maxillae in Coleopterous insects, with an account ot two species of the family Teluphoridae {Chauhogfiathus mar- gi/iatus, and 0. bimaculas), and three of the family Mordeliidae {R. hipi- phorus (Umidiatus, R. Limbatus and R. trutia) which ought to be the type of two distinct genera. Ibid. pp. 438-463. 1832. On North American Spiders. Silliman's Journal of Science and Arts. XXI., pp. 99-152. 1833. Enumeration of the Spiders of the United States. Hitchcock's Report on Geology, etc., of Massachusetts, p. 564, (cout tins only the list ot genera published in the preceding paper). 1835. List of Spiders of the United States. IbU. Second edition. (This edition enumerates one hundred and twenty-five species, mostly by name, and arrange i under the gener l given in the first edition. The species are those described in the J )urual Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist.) 1841. Description of an American Spider {ISpei m 'phora vneriu'ionalis) constituting a new subgenus of the tribe InaequitalcB, Laireille. Ibid. XLl. pp. 115-117. 1841. Species of Mygale of the United States. Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., I. pp 4: -42. 1842. D .•scrii)tion atid Figures of the Araueides of the United States. Jourrrdl Bost. Soc. Nist.,IV., pp. 55-57. Pi. 7. Contiiiuation, pp. 223-231. PI 8. 1844. Continuation, ibid., pp. 386-396, PI. 17-19. 1845 C -ntinuation, ibid , V., pp. 189-2 )2. PI. 16, 17. 1846. Continuation, ibid , pp. 352-369. PI. 21, 22 1847 continuation, ibid., pp. 444-478. PI. 23, 24, 30, 31. 1850. Continuation, ibid , VI., pp. 18-35. PI. 3, 4. Conclusion, pp. 271-295. PL 9. 10. 1867. Supplement to the Description and Figures of the Araneides of the United States. Edited by S. t£. Scudder. Pr.»c. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., XL, pp, 103-111, with two plates. NoTd. — This list is taken from "Occasional Papes of the Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist , IL The Spiders of the United Slates by N M. llentz, M. D. G. F. Atkinson. i6 JOURNAL OF THE A NEW TRAP-DOOR SPIDER. BY GEORGE F. ATKINSON. In his excellent work on trap-door spiders, Mr. Mog- gride says, " There would doubtless be a just feeling of pride and satisfaction in the heart of a naturalist, who could say that he had made himself thoroughly acquainted with all the species of a particular group of animals, had learned their most secret habits, and mastered their several relations to the objects, animate and inanimate, vvhich surrounded them. But perhaps a still keener pleasure is enjoyed by one who carries about with him some problem of the kind but par- tially solved ; and who, holding in his hand the clue which shall guide him onwards sees in each new place that he vis- its fresh opportunities of discovery. The latter is certainly the condition of those who take an interest in searching out the habits and characters of trap-door spiders.'" While many interesting facts, in the life history, and arch- itecture of trap-door spiders were observed and collected by Mr. Moggridge, he very modestly says that many remain yet to be gathered in ; that we are only on the threshold of discoveries of these creatures who have lain quiet in the earth century after century ; and that he will be satisfied to have been able to " hold the door sufficiently ajar to permit those who love nature and her ways to catch a glimpse of the wonders and beauties of the untrodden land that lies beyond."' A favorable circumstance afforded me an opportunity for making some observations on the unseen " wonders and beauties of the untrodden land " which is the abode of these interesting creatures, and it is with a sense of pleasure that I note them. Some time the latter part of May, or early part o( June, 'Harvesting Ants and Trap-Door Spiders. Supplement, p. 180. -UarvresLing Ants and Trap-Door Spiders, p. 136. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 17 1885, Mr. Meriitt, of Pittsboro, N. C, brought to Chapel Hill, two trap-door spiders with their nests, and placed them in the care of Prof Holmes, for the University of North Car- olina. The nests with their occupants were placed in the ground for the summer. On Nov. 12, after a careful search Prof Holmes was able to find only one, and this one with difficulty, as for some reason it had dug through the lower end of the tube and was hidden in the earth. Later I shall offer what seems to me may be an explanation of this. On the morning of the same day, the spider with its trap-door nest was placed in my keeping, which was the first intima- tion I had of the presence of such an agreeable neighbor. At 4:3c, p. m., I placed 'dj4 inches of earth in a glass jar 5 inches in diameter and 7 inches deep. Two thirds of the surface of the soil was then covered with moss. In this the spider was placed, and the jar and its contents taken to my room, that I might, if possible, observe the operation of dig- ging the tube and making the trap-door. The results were most gratifying. Just before going to supper, at dusk, I observed that the spider had not under- taken the work. Upon returning at 8:30, p. m., I found the task undertaken. The spider was resting m a hole about 2o"i.ni. deep by 22"^-™- in diameter, which she had excavated at iOne side of the jar. I placed the jar upon my study tabic, just beneath the light of a student lamp, so that while read- ing I could observe any movements made by my companion. The spider was resting in the hole with its legs partially folded, the anterior ones lying upon the edge of the exca- vation After I had been quiet for some time the spider began to move cautiously, and turning about slowly, went head first into the hole, and dug from the bottom with her mandibles a pellet of earth about the size of a small pea. Then turning carefully around she placed it at the edge of the hole where she pushed it off with aid of her palpi, at the same time working her mandibles up and down. At first the spider seemed timid, and would cease operations upon the slightest movement on the part of myself During the course of the evening three other persons who came to my room had the fortune to witness the operation of digging out the earth. The spider soon became bold, paid no attention to move- ments in the room, and permitted me to watch her very closely. Occasionally, by using both palpi at once, the dirt was flirted suddenly from the grasp of the mandibles i8 JOURNAL OF THE with such force as to strike against the opposite side of the jar. Had it not been for this obstruction the dirt must have been thrown three or four feet. After depositing each load on the edge of the hole the spider would turn around agai'n for another load, but before picking it up, she would project the posterior pair of spin- nerets about 5"^-™- from the abdomen, and carefully knead the viscid liquid upon and around the freshly placed pellet of earth, and over the edge for a distance of 4™-™- or 5 m.nt.^ for the purpose of making the soil adhere and prevent its caving in. In Plate I, Fig. 4, the spider is shown in the act of removing a pellet of earth from her mandibles. In ^ig- 5. is represented the application oi the viscid liquid. The ends of the spinnerets are applied to the surface alter- nately, as shown in the illustration. The legs took no part in the application of the viscid liquid ; nor did the liquid form a thread when the spinnerets were drawn from the sur- face, as I have since seen it when the spider was crawling about on the surface of the earth.' At 1 1:30 o'clock, when the hole was about 4™-^^- in depth, to my surprise and pleasure the spider began to make the ** trap-door." Standing upon its fore feet and placing the spinnerets against the glass jar at the level of the edge of the hole, the spider covered the glass with the viscid liquid. Several pellets of earth were stuck to this, each time another portion of the viscid liquid being applied. After a depth of ^iii.m. j^^(-j been built up in this way, which was to answer as the hinge, the spider cut a sprig of the moss and cemented it to the hinge so that the end projected above it. Small sticks, particles of moss and earth were constantly placed upon the edge of the growing door. Each time the spider would come out of the hole for new material, retreat backward, and turn halfway around so as to apply it to the door. Placing the load on the under side of the partial door, she would care- fully move it up to the edge. Then placing the distal por- tion of the palpi and anterior pair of legs above, while the proximal portion of these limbs and the ends of the mandi- bles were on the under side of the pellet and door, she would 'As I am now writing, Jan. 16, 1886, 11:55, p. m., the spider is crawl- ing about on the surface of a freshly prepared jar of eanh. Sometimes the viscid liquid adhering to some object is drawn out in a band of silk 2m. m. wide, and the pieces of moss strewn on the earth are loosely matted together in the path of the spider about the side of the jar. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 19 fit and press it in shape, as one would mold with the hand a moist portion of earth by pressing it into a thin sheet. This is illustrated in Fig. 7, Plate XXII. Indeed it looked very much like the black bony fingers of a hand performing the work of pressing. The greatest pressure seemed to be brought to bear upon the rounded ends of the madibles. After fastening on a portion thus, the spider would take an inverted position and apply viscid liquid along the edge and under surface of the door, as shown in Plate XXIII, Fig. 6. She would then turn about and crawl out for more material. The hole being by the side of the jar, I could watch the operation both in the hole and upon the cover. By I o'clock in the morning (Nov. 13,) the door was finished so that the spider could pull down the lid, which completely closed the entrance, nicely fitting in around the edge and appearing as if there was no hole nor spider, but through the glass the spider could still be seen. At intervals during the construction of the door, the spider would pull it down to observe where the next pellet should be placed in order to make the door fit the circular opening of the tube. Discovering this she would turn completely around, and not being able with her head in the bottom of the tube to see the place where she intended to put the next load, she would find it by feeling about with her spinnerets. The viscid liquid would then be applied ^nd the pellet of earth fitted with extreme nicety. Satisfied with the result of my experiment I retired. By daybreak I found that the excavation was continued after the completion of the trap-door, the soil being deposited around the nest to raise the surface of the earth in the jar to a level with the top of the nest. Without close searching it was impossible to detect the door. The mode of making the trap-door by this spider differs very widely from that observed by other naturalists so far as I can find any record. Mr. Moggridge saw the female, Ne- inesia Meriodinalls, construct a trap-door in captivity. He made a cylindrical hole in a flower-pot of earth. Into this the spider disappeared. " During the night following the day of her capture she made a thin web over the aperture, into which she wove any material which came to hand. The trap-door at this stage resembled a rudely constructed, hori- zontal, geometrical web, attached by two or three threads to the earth at the mouth of the hole, while in this web were caught the bits of earth, roots, moss, leaves, etc., which the 20 JOURNAL OF THE spider had thrown into it from above. After the second night the door appeared nearly of the normal texture and thickness, but in no case would it open completely, and it seemed the spider was too much disgusted with her quarters to think it worth while to make a perfect door.'" He also records the making of a door by a very young one of this species, in which the threads, except at the hinge, were cut so that the door would open and shut.* The only thing he records which seems at all analagous to the mode of making a trap-door exhibited by the spider in my possession is that manifested in the enlargement of nests and trap-doors by spiders as they grow larger, and consequently require nests of larger dimensions. This ope- ration was not witnessed by him, however, but the additions to the size of the door were proven by measurements and observations upon nests of young spiders at different seasons,'^ It would seem natural to suppose that, in making slight additions from time to time to the edge of the nest, the spider would cement pellets of earth, pieces of moss, etc., to the edge, instead of first spinning a web ; unless the web is spun over the lower side of the door and made to project just far enough to fit the enlarged tube. In Plate XXIII, Fig. 8, can be seen eight concentric " lines of growth," as they might be termed, of the trap-door, corresponding to the growth and needs of the spider. These I judge to represent the succes- sive enlargements of the door concomitant with the enlarg- ing of the tube. We can safely say that these additions were made by cementing the material, piece by piece, which forms each ring, to the edge of the door. These " lines of growth " are not present in the door made by the adult spider in cap- tivity. I induced the spider to make the door the fourth time, (Jan. 19, 1886,) in order to observe if there was any regularity in the cementing of the particles, which might form these lines of growth in a door made by an adult spider. There is no such regularity. Indeed his last door was made of about a dozen very large pellets of clay, which, being very plastic, the spider was able to press each pellet into a sheet of considerable dimensions. It is to be regretted that Mr. Moggridge did not have the 'Harvesting Ants and Trap-Door Spiders, p. 118. 'Harvesting Ants and Trap-Door Spiders, p. 119. ^Idem. pp. 123. 127 and 150, and Supplement, p. 245. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 21 opportunity ©f observing the manner of enlargement of trap- doors made by the spiders which he studied, or that he did not offer some theory as an explanation. If the particles are cemented to the edge, it would be quite natural that the spe- cies of spider in my possession once made its door by first spinning a web across the mouth of the tube, and then weav- ing into it other material, as in the case of N. meridiortnlis; and that the habits, followed through life and successive gen- erations, of making additions to the door by cementing par- ticles to the edge, finally became so fixed that this mode of making additions to it became the permanent habit and type of construction of the trap-door from the foundation ! The rapidity, ease, and intelligence manifested in this method of building up the door, piece by piece, certainly indicates a higher development of instinctive power. A perfect and neatly fitting and swinging door made in i y^ hours ! When I took the spider from her nest it was necessary to remove nearly all of the soil from the jar and take her from the lower end of the tube, as all efforts to attract her from the nest failed. As the soil was very loose and the nest not long made the walls of the tube collapsed. In ten days the spider was returned to the nest. Though the trap-door was capable of being used, and seemed to satisfy the spider's idea of the " fitness of things," it was in a very dilapidated condi- tion. This agrees wnth. what Mr. Moggridge says of the re- luctance manifested by spiders to abandon an old nest. The examples cited by him are that if a door be pinned back, during the night a second door will be made ; that if the nest be covered with earth the tube will be prolonged to the surface of the superimposed earth and a new trap-door will be made ; and that in some cases nests become inverted, when, a door being made at the now upper end of the tube, the nest will have a door at each end ! ' The conduct of my spider under another condition farther illustrates this feature. Wishing to observe the habit of the spider if possible while the door of the nest was closed, I prepared a glass test tube, jyiri.m. jj^ diameter by placing, 4*'"' from the mouth, a cork bottom, so that the spider might have something on which to stand while making the door. This, with the spider in it, I placed in the glass jar and surrounded it with earth to darken the walls, hoping thus, because of the firm smooth surface of the tube she would not line it with silk, and by 'Harvesting Ants and Trap-Door Spiders, pp. 121 and 122. 22 JOURNAL OF THE lifting the tube from the soil I could observe the position of the spider as it held down its door. The experiment was a decided success. This was prepared at eleven o'clock on the night of Dec. 27, '85. Pieces of moss were strewn about the tube. By morning a perfectly fitting door, beautifully covered with moss had been constructed (Plate XXtV. Fig. 3). About this time many visitors came to see the spider, and in pulling at the door to show how persistently she would resist its being opened, the hing became loosened, and the door was pulled down upon her. She held on to the door with such tenacity that I pulled it into bits in my efforts to remove it from her grasp. It was removed Dec. 30, '85, and on the following night she built another as neatly as the first. The hinge to this became loosened and the door moved down about 5™-"i- from the mouth of the tube. Here she strength- ened the hinge by spinning a broad piece of silk, the width of the hinge, from the door down on to the wall of the tube. Several times in endeavoring to open the door I tore pieces from its edge and in every instance the spider repaired it. Finally, when I wished to remove her from the tube I was obliged to push up on the cork bottom, and in this way crowd her out through the door. After this was done it was with some difficulty that she freed her posterior feet from the silk bag which she had constructed at the bottom, so firmly did she hold on. I have this yet to add. In a note I have mentioned the wandering of the spider about in a jar of freshly prepared earth, Jan. 16. For three days she has been restless, and though several attempts have been made to dig a tube she has failed. I came to the conclusion that the soil was not such as she could work easily or satisfactorily. Wishing to have soil which would make a more desirable tube than the loose soil in which I saw the first nest made, I used a large proportion of fine plastering sand mixed with black earth. This was wetted, and pieces of moss strewn over the surface. She tried several times to take up pellets of the earth, but seemed to be disgusted with its crumbling. She then tried to bore a hole by pushing down with her mandibles while turning her body around. She evidently wished to hide her head from the light, for after making a hole 2"^"' deep she re- mained with her head at the bottom. To-day, Jan. 14, '86, the soil in the woods having thawed sufficiently 1 prepared a jar of moist, ferruginous clay, very much like that of which ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 23 the nest is constructed that came from Pittsboro. Upon this I put a fine mat of fresh moss, coverin^^ the earth except a spot at one side 2}4''^*' in diameter. In this I placed the spi- der at noon. I then covered it from the h"^ht. As I returned to m}' room after dinner she was restini^ in a hole 3 '"' deep which she had excavated, and small pellets of earth were placed against the moss at the mouth of the hole. She would not work durini^ the day unless I covered the jar from the light. During the evening, by lamp light, I had the pleasure of seeing her make another door. It required about I j/ hours. Only one piece of moss was used and that I let drop into the hole while she was at work. This seemed very strange for the tube was the onl)' i)lace not covered with moss, and to save her the trouble of cutting the moss I had strewn loosened particles about the hole. In this case all of the earth used in the con.struction of the door was taken from the bottom of the hole. The door being made almost entirely with the clay was v^ery conspicuous in comparison with the surrounding moss ; though the door fitted ver}' neatly, the tube being built up to a level with the top of the moss. This time instead of making the hinge against the side of the jar, it was made on the opposite side of the tube. I was unable to understand how the resistance to opening the door was offered, if the spider fastened its fangs and (ill of its claws into the under surf ice of the door, as Mr. Mog- gridge states.' A reference to Plate XX I \'. J'^gs. 3 and 4, will show the results I reached in the experiment when the spider was induced to make a trap-door to the mouth of a glass test tube. The portion of the tube from h to r was not lined with silk. The spider, evidentl)' not admiring the cork at (/ for a bottom to her nest, carried in pellets of earth and bits of moss as shown at ] and the silk bag at r, were for some flistance transparent so that J w as enabled to see the spider fairl)' well. As can be seen in fig. 14, the si)ider clings to the bag of silk at the bottom (or walls of the tube) with the claws of her two posterior pair of legs, and to the under surf ice of th(' door with her fin<'"sand 'Harvesting Ant.s and Trap Door Spiders, pp. *J5 and 00. 24 JOURNAL OF THE the claws of her anterior pair of legs. By partially lifting the door I was enabled to see the hold upon the door, and when I pushed the spider out of the tube, as before stated, I found her feet entangled in the bag of silk. The manner in which this spider holds down the nest is precisely the same as that described by P^merton' in the case of Cteniza Calif or- nica, except that he states the " 3rd and 4th pairs of legs are pressed out against the walls of the tube." The nest of this spider belongs to the simple, unbranched type with shallow cork door. The door belonging to the nest in which the spider was caught (Plate XXIV. Fig. i,) measures 3 to 4™-™- in thickness ; the edge is beveled and fits neatly in the mouth of the tube. The door measures 2^m.m. across near the hinge ; the tube 6o"^*""- in length. The walls are badly collapsed and the lower edge ragged and open. It will be remembered that the spider was found in the earth below the tube when the nest was taken up in No- vember. The first nest which the spider made under my observation was open at the bottom, and when I attempted to take her out, finding she could not hold down the door she attempted to bury herself in the soil at the bottom of the tube. The question naturally arises, Is this not left open as a last means of escape from enemies ? I am inclined to think it is, in some cases at least with this species, as this is the only resort for safety after the door is open. Further observation is needed on this point. The trap-door of this nest is so hung that it tends to close itself. In Fig. 2, Plate XXIV. at (I are patches of silk that are drawn on the stretch when the door is open. When all resistance is removed these tend to close the door. The subject of the food of trap-door spiders is an interest- ing one, and much is yet to be learned of their habits in this respect. While I had the spider out of her tube I offered her several house flies, holding them by one wing, with the forceps, near her head. The struggles of the fly attracted her attention. With a quick sweep of the palpi and anterior pair of legs she would clutch the fly and place it between her powerful mandibles, crushing it immediately. She held some of these about one minute, but I very much doubt her having derived any nourishment from them. One of the smaller species of the flies belonging to the genus Tabanus was offered her. It seemed only to frighten her as she could 'Structure and Habits of Spiders, p. 45. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 25 not be made to touch it even by being angered, but would turn and run away as if in great fear. After returning the spider to her nest, Dec. 8, I placed in the jar two ants and a small carabid beetle. The ants hid themselves in the earth. Dec. 14th, the beetle was still unharmed and I concluded the spider did not come out for food. I then lifted the trap- door and placed the beetle inside. Dec. 16, I found the bro- ken hard parts of the beetle strewn about just outside the nest. It had been killed, the soft parts eaten by the spider, and the parts of the skeleton ejected from the nest. Jan. 17, 'S6, I placed a half dozen large yellow ants in the jar.' As they attacked her she would catch and crush them but I did not see that she ate any of them. Jan. 2, '86, which was like a summer da}' at Chapel Hill, I went into the woods for the purpose of collecting some mo.ss. While tearing up a large patch of this, at the foot of a tree, I discovered a hole which I thought to be the nest of a trap-door spider. I dug down into the tube and found at the bottom a spider belonging to this family. In the after- noon I found several nests and one more female spider. Under some stones I found a male. I placed them in jars of earth containing moss. One of the females escaped ; the other built a nest and made a slanting double door, which might be compared to an outside cellar door. Each door is made of moss cemented with silk and hung by a semicircular hinge. These the spider will open and shut at pleasure, sometimes fastening them together with a thread of silk. In both of the nests in which I found these spiders, there were the lemains of ants. I had intended to illustrate and describe farther the nests and habits of these found by myself at Chapel Hill, as they are lively creatures and seem to offer interesting objects for study as to habit, food and architect- ure. But as this article is already long, and I wish to make further collections and study their habits more closely in captivity I will reserve the subject for a future time. 'The spider was not in her nest. 26 JOURNAL OF THE EXPLANATION OF PLATES. PLATE XXIII. Fig. 1. Sj/ider, natural tize; dursal view. '■ 2. tspider, natural size : ventral view. " 3. Spider, U'itural size ; side vii w. " 4. Spider in the act of unloading a pellet of earth while exca" vatmg the tube. <(,, peilet of earth. " 5. Si)ider ai>i)l}ii)g vii-cid 'i([nid to tlie fre.shly i»laced pellet of e'arth. «, si)inneret. " 6. Si)i(!er applying viscid litiuid to the eelge of the partially con- struct* el door. <*. spiiui' rets. />, door, c, i^ieces t)f moss. " 7. Spider in the act of titting U) edge of the door a pellet of earth, ". *' 8. Trap-door showing eight concentric rings which represent the successive additions to the edge of the door corresponding to the enlargement of the tube, a, hinge PLATE XXIV. Fig. 1, Natural size of nest in which the spider wa? caught. " 2. Trap-door open, a, bands of silk which tend to close the open door, b, claw and fung marks of spider made while holding dow-n the door. " 3. Nest made in glass test tube. «, hinge. /, bag of silk. rZ, cork bottom, g, j-ieces of moss and earth. '* 4. Spider in act of holding down the door, while in the nest. All natural size. A FAMILY OF YOUNG TRAP-DOOR SPIDERS. "^^ (Pachylomerus, 4 — spinosus.) Two questions were asked by Mr. Moggridge about the habits of young trap-door spiders. For the answer to these he was unable to inake any observations, so far as the record shows. The questions are ; 1st, do young traprdoor spiders make nests like those of the parent without being shown ? *Thi8 paper has been previeusly published in the Entomologica Amer- icana, Vol II, Aug. 1886. (3) PLATE XXIII. 1 5 - 6 CL CFAthinsori del. {'•' ^m^-ctrm A new Trap door Spider. PLATE XXIV. ^ 2 A new Trap- door Spider. :i ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 27 2nd, do the males of trap-door spiders make a nest with a trap-door when very young ? To the first question we would almost unhesitatin<^ly reply in the affirmative, without direct observation. In regard to the second, it is well known by those who have given much attention to the habits of trap-door spiders, that the mature males, at least, do not build trap-door nests, but seek a hiding place under stones, logs, etc. There is also another question as to the constancy with which species follow a unifonit type in the construction of their nests. Some naturaHst make the different kinds of nests a partial basis for classification, and others are looking for differential characters manifested in the variationsof the trap-door; whether the door is horizontal ; the hinge lower or higher than the distal part of the door sloping one side, etc. Tlie object of this paper is to present the variations pro- duced by a family of 2(S young trap-door spiders, in the building of their nests, which I have carefully observedand noted. I trust also to show that, from the labors of these little creatures, and of several mature ones, which I have had in captivity, a great deal of light is thrown on the questions stated above. The family was captured by D. E. Woodly, student at Chapel Ilill.'N. C, March 17, 1886. The mother had either deserted her children, or liad met with her death. The tube was doorless'and near a decaying stump. The 28 childre n were living ))eacefully together in the silken cocoon which had contained the e^i^s at the bottom of the tube. A fter keeping them together in a small vial for one day, I prepared a bottle of earth for each one. The bottles measure i Yz inches in diameter by three inches deep. In each about I Yi inches in depth of earth was placed. The earth was moi.st, loose, but smoothed over and gently packed to furnish a smooth surface for operations. The following table shows the time of beginning and com- pletion of the work of each. In column 4 is given the time when the work bei^an which was carried to completion. Some began work earlier than here in dicated but aban- doned it. 28 JOURNAL OF THE 1 2 Time plac- 4 5 6 No. Date rime when work Time whn trap- Time trap- Mar. '86. "d in bot began. door was beg'-n was c<)m])'d 1 18 5pm Unobserved. Unobserved. Unobserved 2 18 5 p m «( li (( ^ 18 5pm ({ .i u Mar 19, 3.30 a m 5 a m 5.15 H. m* 4 18 5 p m " 19,12.30 am 1 a m 2am 5 18 5pm " 19, 2 30am 4 20 a m 5am 6 18 10.30 p m " 18, 11.15 am Mar 19, l2.30arr " 19, 3 5r, a m lam 4.20 a m* 7 18 10.30 p m 11.30 pm " 19, 12.30 am 2 30am 8 18 10.30 p m Mar 19, 12 30 a m 3 20 a m 4 a m 9 1« 10.30 p m " 19, 2am 3 20 a m 4am 10 18 10.30 p m " 19,7 am 9am 10 am 11 19 4.10 p m 4.15 a m 5.5j p m 7.30 p m 12 19 4.10 p m •' 20, 11 a m Unobserved. 2.30 p m 13 19 4.10 p m " 19.4.30 pm 5.50 p m 6.30 p m 14 19 4.10 p m •' 20, 10 a m 1pm 2.30 p m 15 19 4.10 p m " 19, 5.18 p m Unobserved Unobserved 16 19 4.30 p m 5.15 p m 6 20pm (( 17 19 4 30 p m 4 45 p m Unobserved (( 18 19 4.30 p m 5.10 p m 5 50 p m 6.30 p m 19 J9 6 30 p m 7.-0 p m 9.15 pm Unobserved 20 19 6.30 p m Unobserved. Unobserved. (I 21 19 6.30 D m (( (( « 22 19 6.30 i) m 9 20 p m t( ti 23 19 9pm 9.50 p m (( (( 24 19 9pm 9 25 p m (C (; 25 19 9pm Unobserved. I (( 26 19 9pm Mar 20, 4pm Not noted. Not noted. 27 19 9pm " 21, 10 p m 1pm 5 p m 28 19 9 p m " 20, 10 p m 11 a m • 1 1 30 a m * Nest was. destroyed and another built. Variation'^ fvdin the normal ti/pr. By the normal type is meant that which seems to be the simplest, most nearly per- fect, plan of construction, is followed by a majority of those observed, and seems to indicate a vafiind hisifind, a more potent influence of inherited habit in some, while in others the instinct seems to be latent at first and gradually unfolds with the dawning of consciousness ! According to the nor- mal type, the spider takes up pellets of earth with its man- dibles, and turning around, places them upon the soil by the side of the tube, which is being dug ; or carries or throws them to a short distance. Occasionally with its spinnerets it applies viscid liquid to the pellets and QdgQ of the tube, much as an artificer would alternately place cement and bricks in the construction of a column. The trap-door is built in the same manner, by beginning, at one side of the ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 29 edge of the hole, a horizontal wall to which particles are ce- mented and pressed in shape to make a flat, circular, lid to the tube.* By a study of Plate IV we shall see some of the variations from the normal type. Vig. i, a, represents one of the spiders, natural size, />, section of a nest built after the nor- mil type, door represented open, alsonitural size. All of the other fig-ures, except 15 and 16, are mignified. In fig. 2, one side of tube, a, is extended above ground and carried over the tube. The door, represented open, is hinged at /> ; when closed it slopes downwards from the hinge attach- ment, fig. 3. This was the work of No. 3. The arched wall from fi, was pressed in shape in the same way that the trap door is, so that when the spider began it at n, I thought it had begun the trap door, and m ide this entr}^ in my notes: "At 4.30 door begun ; two-thirds of the edge used for attach- ment of the hinge, making an awkward door." When the hinge was m:ide at A, it was easy to see the arching of the wall was intentional. In fig. 10, the tube is curved above ground in a similar way, but the hinge is at one of the slop- ing sides, m iking a door that swings to the right and left in- stead of up and down. This wms mideby No. 25. Fig- ures 4, 5, 6 and 7 represent the work of No. 15. A trench was dug, using the excavated eirth for a wall on each side ; the walls were then united by an arch over the middle, one end closed and a trap-door made at the other end. Fig. (S, represents the nest of No. 22, built in the same way as that of No. 15, except that at a, the hole was not entirely closed. No. 13 built what is shown in fig. 9. A trench with a wall each side was first built; in the middle of the trench was due the tube and the door hinged at the base of one wall at *-/, with the distal part of the door elevated at h. Fig. 11, shows the work of No. 24; a trench was dug b\' the side of the glass with a wall on one side at o ; on the other side earth was carried upon the side of the glass and attached in small lumps at A; f\ represents the nest, a small tower against the glass. Fig. 12, was made by No. 26. This is interesting as being the only one showing the concentric " lines of growth" usually noticed in the doors of nests that have been used for a year or so. No. 14, first dug a shallow hole as represented at A, fig. 13; abandoning this it dug *Por description aud il.u.-^tration of tlio building of a nest and trap- door by P. Caribivorus, see Amer Nat for July 1886. 30 JOURNAL OF THE another at c ; it then removed the earth at d, making a trench ; next it began the tube at c, but soon abandoned it, began again at 6, restored d, and completed the nest in the normal way. The following table shows the varying posi- tions of the door when closed. Horizontal: Nos. i, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, lo, 1 1, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 27, 28. Sloping downward from hinge attachment: Nos. 3, 7, 8, 15, 17, 22, 24, 26. Rising from hinge attachment : No. 13.- Slopi'hg door with hinge at one side : No. 25. Table showing the kinds of nests. Curved tube: Nos. 3, 8, 25. Straight tube: Nos. I, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28. Trench with arched walls : Nos. 7, 15, 17, 22. Nests of mature spiders, of this genus made in captivity present some of the variations mentioned above, as also some of the nests found in a state of nature. One of the most interesting things which came under my observation during the work of these spiders was the vary- ing potency of instinct manifested in the aptness with which each performed the task of building its home. This will be best illustrated by giving a few of the more striking ex- amples recorded in my notes. No. 6, was placed in the bottle at 10.30 p. m. and began digging the tube in the nor- mal way at 11. 15 p. m. It worked rapidly, sometimes aking up and unloading a pellet of earth in 10 seconds. Indeed it worked with as much ease, accuracy, and apparent thoughtfulness, as the mature one which I have described in the previous paper. Sometimes with its palpi it would flirt the pellet across to the opposite side of the bottle. It began making the trap-door at 12.30 a. m. and completed it at i a m. ; one hour and forty minuts from the time it began work, and two hours and thirty minutes from the time it was placed in the bottle.^ During the operation every move- ment seemed to facilitate the work. No. 19, was placed in the bottle at 6.30 p. m. : my notes read as follows : — "Began digging tube in normal way at 7.50. Does not seem to be satisfied with work, and begins in another place. This is done several times : 915 began making trap-door," etc. No. *One eompleted the work in one hour and 20 minutes ; and another 1 hour and 30 minutee. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 31 26 was placed in bottle at 9 p. m., Mar. 19th. At i p. m., Mar. 20th, it began digging and soon abandoned this place for another. This it repeated as many as a dozen times, sometimes returning to the work and tearing away at the soil as if in a frenzy, and impelled by some irresistible power. Then suddenly leaving the spot it would wander and endeavor to climb the side of the glass ; when it would as suddenly be seized with an irresistible inclination to tear away at the earth without any seeming purpose. Occasion- ally it seemed to work with more deliberation, as if it were gradually becoming conscious of a latent instinctive power! At 4 p. m. it continued work in one place until the nest was completed, but the door, which is represented in fig. 13, was barely hung together and was loosely hinged by three strands. A few days later I tore down this nest, when the spider went to work in the normal way and built a perfect nest. Upon this point alone it would be interesting to fol- low carefully the notes I have taken on all, but I fear it would make the article too long, so I will conclude this sub- ject with reference to a few others. One without digging in the normal way pressed the dirt aside ; buried itself, and then spun a bag of silk surrounding it. When removed from this it went to work in the normal way. Several others acted very much like this one, and No. 26. These variations could not be attributed to a difference in the nature of the soil as in the case of variations noticed among adult spiders, when the soil at times was of a differ- ent character. Care was taken that the soil should be of the same compactness and moisture for each. In some cases a hard lump caused the spider to remove to another place, and in one or two instances the spiders waited so long before be- ginning work that the soil was too dry ; pouring in water packed the earth too hard and it was necessary to loosen it before the spider could take up a pellet. With close watch- ing and due allowance for conditions just mentioned there seems to be great variableness in the attitude which different young individuals at first show in the construction of their nest. In some cases the consciousness, if fit might so be called, of instinctive power flashes upon them when they first are made to shift for themselves ; while with others there seems to be a greater or less development or dawning of the same consciousness. Mr. Moggfidge also asks at which end of the tube the spider begins to spin the silken lining ? This pecies, so far 32 JOURNAL OF THE as I have observed, (I have watched over thirty individuals,) always be^jins at the upper end. I had several opportunities of witnessing this among the young ones, and one mature one,* when the spinning of the lining was done very beautifully. In fig. 14 a spider is represented in the act of spinning the silken lining at the upper part of the tube. When the viscid fluid coming from the spinnerets cools before it is applied to an object it forms a broad band or ribbon as it might be called ; by elevating and depressing the body perpendicu- larly as shown in fig. 14, and touching the spinnerets here and tiiere to the wall of the tube this ribbon of silk is fas- tened. By moving around the tube at the same time the lin- ing is made complete for the perpendicular distance covered by the spider in its movements. Some times instead of ele- vating and depressing in the manner just described the spider will move around the ^tube fastening the ribbon in circles. Figs. 15 and 16 represent a novel way of excavating a hole which I witnessed in the case of a mature spider. With its legs as supporters on each side of the tube it would elevate its abdomen in the air and hook its mandibles in the earth at the bottom of the hole ; then revolving through a quadrant about the axis at n^ fig. 15, it would bring the earth to the surface and push it off with its palpi, as shown in fig. 16. From this study we may conclude the young of trap-door spiders build their nests instinctively ; that males as well as females build trap-door nests before the sexual character and habits are well developed, which in the case of the males make a somewhat wandering habit necessary in order to find the females ; that young and old vary in making their nests from the normal type, so that die position or relative sloping of the door or tube could not be of any value in the classi- fication ; that this species does not use its legs to aid in spin- ning the lining to its tube, and that they spin the lining at the upper end of the tube first ; and lastly that they vary in the degree of skill manifested as artificers and the maturity of instinctive power.f EXPLANATION OF PLATE. Fig; \. a, Young trjp-door spi^^ler, natural Kfze h, section of ne>t with ope»i door, built in normnl way, also natural size. Fig-i. 2 and 3 curved *P lurris tAU of the observation^^ maie use of in the preparation of this aiticle were made on three species. Description*? of the new species collected, their nests, and food habits, I hope to have published in a subsequent article h' G-co ^- fV^K\^&oA;^Tim\ T\eiUv2.. ¥ f 'A' ••J ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 33 tube with slanting door. Fig. 4, trench with wall each side seen from one end. Fig. 5, arch. connecting walls. Fig 6, same, closed at one end. Fig. 7, same, with trap-door built «t the other end. Fig 8, another built on same plan, but the first opening n'»t quite closed, a loose flap at a. Fig. 9, tube dug between two walls, hiage at ^e has described and named."" The v\ip(^ci:diy as coming from a non NMtni-alist setans impi()bal)le,a spider's faI(HMS being in no way titled a,p uentiy for such an oixsratiou " Where tlie silk lining was thin, it would be a V' ly easy matter for a spider to cut through, and then repair the r)nghness by cemcnnng on particles. It is pr»)t ably iiu exagg! ration t<» say that they " invariably" construct them ui that nianiur, ' ut 1 should not be surpri.-ed it s-onic species made the trap-door in the manner de-criticd by this non " naturalist." •I have never seen this sj^idcv p.e-s the lid on tlui i n i of its mandi- bles as do."s /'. cnrri>r>is. I think this slitiws th;! adaptjition of the spf^. iai a,]-iiifitnr'' <»1' the inandbile of /'. r/trahir'^rns, and related forms, for fastening the eattli to Ihe lid. /'. riirah.v 'ms usuaby makes no thrcMd in applying the viscid rnjuid to the r(nK'h('(l nest . The fifth I collected on the same day and not more than 10 feet distant. Turning over a stone I saw a tube which ran down one of the perpendicular sides of the hole, in which the rock fitted, then along the bottom to near the cen- ter of where the stone lay. Here it disappeared taking a 40 JOURNAL OF THE perpendicular direction again. I ran a straw down this tube and felt the movements of the spider. The spider would not seize the straw, as they sometimes will, and soon I could no longer feel the movements. I theii dug carefully around the tube, and at the depth of about ten inches struck the spider, splitting open its caput. This happened because the spider was in the branch : when I first ran the straw into the tubes she was in the main tube, and probably being frighten- ed ran into the branch and caught hold of the door. This confirms what Mr. Moggridge believes to be the case with spiders making a double door branched nest, that when an enemy succeeds in getting entrance to the main tube the spider will run into the bnmch.' This nest is represented in fig. 15, Plate IV. Though the tube is represented nearly natural size the length is much fore-shortened. The space represented by the dotted lines was 10 inches for each. The spider was found at h ; the cork door can be seen at c. Another specimen was found, about which, unfortunately, I have no record or recollection, except that it was collected sometime during the spring. This, though I have not given it a careful examination I believe to belong to the same species. I left it in the possession of Dr. Geo. Marx, at Washington. The specimen collected Apr. 6, I placed in a jar of earth to see what kind of a nest it made in captivity. For several days it showed no signs of working. Finally I found it bur- ied in the earth much as J/idltxflccfd- nuirx'n is, when having just completed the dome over the tube, and from the appear- ance of things I think the burrow was started, and the dome made in the same way as in the case of that species. The next day in place of the dome, in which there was no moss, was a perfect cork door with an abundance of moss in it. The spider had evidently cleared away the dome, which was made of earth and silk, and made the door of new material. When I lifted up this door the spider would catch hold of it. In a few days I found this door fastened down and that end of the tube filled with earth for a distance of 5 cm. The tube extended in a circuitous direction for 10 cm. or more where it came to the surface and was closed by another nicely fitting trap-door: I think the spider was alarmed at 'Harvesting Ants and Trap-Door Spiders. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 41 the discovery of her nest, and attempted by this strategy to deceive her enemy. If the jar of earth had been more capac- ious, and a longer time given the spider, she might have made a branch and second door. Food liahifs. I have not yei had an opportunity of mak- ing very extensive observations on the food habits of these species, and cannot say that each one is confined to the in- sect for which I am certain it lias a special fondness as an article ofdiet. Of the speci es of /'ac/u/lonicrns my observa- tions have been confined to 'P. carftblvortis. I have already stated the fondness which this speeies has for carabid beetles, and though killing several ants and flies did not use them for food. During July, while at Ithaca, N. Y., I fed several carabid beetles to a 7^. cir-foloorus which I had alive. June 20, I placed a TtiTo-sfichnJi 1 uciihlo nilus\ Say, in the bottle con- taining the nest of the spider. During the night the spider came out of the nest, caugt the beetle, ate it and ejected the hard parts from the nest. July 1st, it disposed of a 'Pterjst'i- r./ius Sat/i\ Brulle. June 29 it ate a beetle of the genus ChhviiiiiH. At another time it ate three good sized beetles of the genus Chhi^nius in one night. The observatiion which I made on iVidiuaJvahi Afarxii in captivity are very interesting. I noticed that at night the spider would throw its doors wide open'' as shown in fig. 17, Plate IV. One evening I placed several in the jar containing the nest. When an ant approached so near the door as to send communication to the spider of its presence, the spider sprang to the entrance, caught a door with the anterior legs ' I am iariebted to Prof J. A. Comst jck for the identitication of the species of beetles. - The position of Nhlwalvdn in the subfamily Krwchniili cp shows its near relation to the Ah/]>him I liave often been struck with ns likf ness to the A'}iph:(p,, especially in the kin".v, nor one of its nests, I have often ( oncluded tliat ln>m the form o' lis nest i' must be somewliat similar to J^'idivdlvaia in architectural habit, and that i1h^ |. P. Cambridge says in Annals of Nat. Hist. 4'h s^eries 1875, Vol. XVI, p. 240 -A\, seems to me to indicate that Afi.p'is is very similar in h ibit to this genus JNTot only in the form of the nest, but in its food habit. He says that on one occasion a nest which apparently had no oritice was buried in a box of earth; subsequently the uibe was observed with a wide open mouth, and again was closed the following morning. The spider probably opens the doors at night to watch lor food, and closes them in the morning as doei iV. marxii. 42 JOURNAL OF THE on either side, and pulled them nearly together, so that there was just space enough left for it to see the ant when it crossed the opening. When this happened, the spider threw the doors wide open, caught the ant, and in the twinkling of an eye had dropped back to the bottom of the tube with its game. This I saw repeated several times during the months of Jan- uary and P\^bruary. At one time I placed a large cricket in the jar. The spider made several attempts to capture it but was not strong enough. It would probably eat crickets when fortunate enough to catch one. I think also that it would eat small carabid beetles, for I found several in the moss where I collected the spider. I have found the remains of ants in the nests. I hav^e made no observations on Mf/DnrkiapIuJn/o/uf.'n in captivity, but from the location of their nests it is quite evident that the members of this species are extremely fond ofants, and seek to build their nests either directly in an ants nest or in close proximity to it. I think in some cases it is intended that the main tube shall be used as a passage for ants, so that by coming out of the branch the spider can capture its food, for it is certain in these which I have ob- served that the external door is either wanting or old and in a neglected condition, while the door at the branch is kept well repaired. If I am correct in this conclusion it would account for the apparent variation noticed in the kind of nest built by this species. In the nest represented in fig. i6, Plate IV, the entrance b, and^the landing ((, a, of the ants' nest answers for the main tube of the spider, and only the one tube and trap-door is required for the use of the spider.' ' Note. — There ^^viriently is quite a variation, even with the same species, in the kind of a nt St which trap-door spiders mnlce. As these prove to be very iDtelligent creatures, I beli« ve the vary in the «'ou- siruction of ihe nest as ihe conditio s of their environment varies, an i that tliey adopt that plan which provides for them the safest abode, and at the sime time will serve them the best as a trap At the same time we must not lose sight of a common typn, wliich, with some useful variati(ms, each species follows; though specie- otdiffiijent genera may n)ake the same kind of h nest, and be identical in food habit, srecies of the same genus may yary with regird to the C')mmon type; so that »he use of msts, and food habits, becomes of less \alue ihan has b eu h' re- tofore supposed by S'>me f )r purp 'ses of clas-ification. Mr. Moggridge says, "H. A. and T. D, Spiders" Supplement, pp. 230, and 237 ; the range and distribution of a sptcies largely I'epeud upon the niture of its food, aud this will also bean indication of the rivals, etc, — ''and in many cases even the .structure ^nd position of its dwelling place will be governed by this same all — important question of food supply. Rev. O. P. Cambridge, at that time came to this conclusion, "and in ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 43 DESCRIPTIONS. Prefatory Note. It is not surprising that in a collection of some forty specimens there would be found several species, nor that a large number of these would prove to be new and undescribed forms, where so little attention has been given to spiders in general, and especially those of the order Territelarice, as has been given in America. It has been a great pleasure to me to observe the nests and habits of so many of these creatures, which by their solitary and secluded life generally escape our observation. It has seemed necessary, that, in connection with interesting descriptions of their nests, architectural and food habits, these forms should be described and named. So interested have I become during the past year in the work of N. M. Hentz, that it would have given me more pleasure to find a specimen described by him than to find a new form. I feel sure that I have found one of his species, and possibly one other related species. I undertook the work of description with great reluctance, and have found it to be no small task. But my labors have been greatly lessened and I have been sensibly encouraged by the kindness of Dr. George Marx, of Washington, Prof J. H. Emerton and Samuel Henshaw, of Boston. Dr, Marx loaned me works from his private library, Prof Emerton placed for my study his excellent collection of Arachnological publications, and specimens for compari- son, which are now in the Mass. Inst. Tech., and showed me further kindness in directing me to the most useful works in the Library of the Boston Natural History Society. Mr. Henshaw also aided me in the same way and gave me the use of the specimens of Territelarice which are in the Museum of the Society. I have also found works in the Boston Public Library which have aided me. In the value of generic and specific characters I have been the present case it is very important, as well as interesting, to conclude with som certainty that differences of type in the tubular ne^ts of the spiders Mr. Mcgti ridge has observed so closely and accurately, are joined to Well marked specific differences etc. "Harvesting Ants and Trap- Door Spiders, Supplement p 301." Later, Cambridge doubts such close union of specific character and architectural habit, for he finds nests of Atypufi piceus varying greatly in construction. (Annals of Nat. Hist. 1878, 5th series, Vol. 1, p. 107.) From nests made in captivity, I know that Pachyhmerus hirris 'and Nidivalvnta anguslata make different nests according as the environments change. 44 JOURNAL OF THE guided by those adopted by Anton Ausserer\ and the Rev. O. P. Cambridge', who have given considerable study to members of the Territelarice. I have followed the classification adopted by Ausserer in his Beitraege zur Keiintidss dtr l^rritelaricB. I subjoin, for clearness, a brief synopsis of his Classifica- tion. Suborder Territdarice. This was divided by Thorell into 3 families, as follows * 2, lung sacs Catadisoid(s. 4, luner sacks, a. AYithout spint) erets Liphistoidice' b. With spinnerets TheraphosoidcB ^ The family Theraphosoidae, Thorell, is further divided into three subfamilies as follows : Maxillge well broadened at the base, palpi inserted laterally, . Atypinae Thorell Maxillae little broadened at base, palpi inserted laterally Eriodontinse Ausserer. Maxillffi not broadened at base, palpi inserted on the end, Theraphosinae Thorell. The Theraphosoidae are then further divided into two groups, based on the relative elevation of the caput above the throax. a. Caput well elevated, ^picephoM' b. Caput not much elevated, Tapinocephali. In specific descriptions I have endeavored to not repeat characters which seem at present generic, so that in most cases it will require both the generic and specific characters to identify a single species ; for this reason I have given the characters of the genus Tachylomertcs, established by Ausserer. Family THERAPHOSOID^, Thorell. Subfamily Eriodontinae, Auss. 1. Genus Nidivalvata, n. gen. (nidus, nest, valvata, having folding doors.) (PI. V, figs. 8, 9, 10, 13, 23.) Ceph'x little longer than broad ; greatest breadth at middle*, tapering very gently and equally to both ends ; edges of posterior half slightly scalloped ; small, deep, circular, depression in center from which radiate to edges of ceph'x 6 depressed lines quite well marked. Caput well ele- vated, sloping to thorax gently, not broadly a' died as in Murmekiaphilt. In front, caput gently drawn to a short, blunt point about which the eyes ' Beitraege zur Kcnntniss der Terrielariae, Auss. 1871, and Zweit.r BeitrfHg, etc., 1876. - Encyclopedia BritaDuica, 9th, Ed. pp. 291 and 597, Harvesting Ants and Trap Door Spiders, Moggridge, and Supplement. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 45 are crowded. Eyes can be better described by speaking of them as X>e- ing in three groups ; the anti-centrals a diameter or less distant and sit- uated at the top and on sides of the hill ; on each side of these, not far separated is a group of three eyes forming a crescent with the concavity toward the midd e group; the eyes in this group nearly or quite touch each other. Fig 8, PI. V, represents the eyes as seen from the Iront at an angle of 45^ to a plane parallel with the base of the ceph'x With this view the ant- and pott-laterals form a trapezium, base at post laterals one-fourth larger than opposite side; height about one- third of base, post centrals slightly in front of base of trapezium. Ant- laterals comparativtly large; others varying in relative size in different fcpecies, and it may be found that the relative position varies also as in Pachylomerus. Maxillae extended in front, but not so much as in Eriodon. Fig. 10 represents a maxilla showing insertion of palpus. Labium triangular, distal end rounded, longer than broad at iDase. Mandibles strongly kneed in front of pprpendicular clypeus. About half or less than half as long as ceph'x , br )ad and deep, armed with a compar.itively strong fang ; the inner edge only of furrow for re- ception of fang arme I with terth ; upper and inner edges of anterior half armed with short spines, which also extend part way around base of fang. Legs 4, 1, 3, 2. 4, 1, 3. 3, or 4, 1, 2, 3 ; palpi long. 3 tarsal claws. Claw of palpus unarmed. Abdomen short oval. Spinnerets 4, the upper pair long and slender. 1. Nidivalvata marxii, n. sp.' female 1 specimen. (PI, V, figs, 8, 9, 10, 13, 23.) Ceph'x broadly oval 6 mm long by 5 mm. broad Caput back of ocular prominence not perceptibly elevated, slope down to depression in center of ceph'x gradual. Caput in front not much contracted on sides. Radial depressions all quite deep ; the posterior one of the laterals on each side, seeming to unite with the central depression. The depressions, though distinct in this specimen, have d<-epened somewhat by alternately being in alcohol and in the air while being studied. In each anterior radial depression on sides of base of caput is a well marked depres-ion, though not deep Post-central eyes fully as large as the ant centrals, eyes of the outer group almost or quite touching. Ant-laterals dark orange, remainder transparent, legs 4, 1. 3, 2. 3rd 12 mm., 2d Hi mm. Sternum longer than broad, with three distinct circular punctures on each side. Abdomen ])roadly oval and bluntly rounded at eacti end ; on ventral surface nar- rowed in front Armature Very few hairs ; short and fine on abdomen, longer and darker on the 4 distal joints of legs. Metatarsus IV, w.th a row 01 spines on each side, and one on under side, with additional spines at each end; tibia IV, witli few long spines irregularly placed on upper side, 3 dis- tinct rows, two on under side and one on anterior side, with extra spines at each end. Patella two double rows ot spines on upper surface. Metatarsus III, 4 rows of spines, two upper and two lower edge: spines irregularly placed on upper side. Patella III, patch of spines on upper anterior surface, broadesr, at distal end; this is separated from a few spines on the p)steri()r surface by an oblique denuded line. Metatarsus II, two double rows of spines, one on anterior surface, and one of long spines on under surface; tibia II and I, double row of long spines on under surface, and single row of short spines on anterior surface. Met- ^ In honor of Dr. Geo. Marx. 46 JOURNAL OF THE atarsus I, three rows of long spines on under and anterior surface Palpus, tarsus and tibia a somewhat double row of long spines on each si'Je; patella, one or two spines on interior surface Labium separated from sternum by a deep farrow. Colors. Upper surface Ceph'x and legs, olive browm. Under surface legs dull yellowish Sternum a little darker. Maxillae dull rufous, with reddish hairs. Ocular prominence black. Ablomen dull yellowish un- derneath, brownish yellow above, wjth two rectangular rich dark brown spots on anterior end Mandibles rufous. Colors little change 1 in al cohol, not so bright however, and marks on abdomen aisappeared. 2. Nidivalvata angustata n sp. female 2, specimens. Ceph'x oblong, 5f mm long by 4 mm broad Caput in front below eyes perceptibly narrowed; caudad of ocular prominence perceptibly elevated, making the descent to the thorax steeper than in N. marxii. Legs 4, I, 2, 3. Anterior central and 1 teral eves dark, the others light ; posterior centrals much smaller comparatively than in iV". m irxii, ani the lateral groups of three distinctly separated. Radial furrows on thorax not so deep as in N. marxii. Otherwise the same. II Genus MYRMEKIAPHILA, n. gen. {murmekia, ants' nest or hill plulos loving ) (PI, V, figs. 6, 7, 12, 14 and 23.) Ceph'x perceptibly longer than broad, nearly J- : crescent shaped de- pr'S^on^ distance from posterior edge, convexity caudad, ends not so extended as iu Pachylomeru^; 6 radial lines, s )metimes qui e indistinct. Greatest width about the middle, narrowing gently to the anterior end, and more percepdbly t )ward posterior end Caput large, high and broadly arched in the anterior f , then steeply descending to depression aad narrowing on the sides to this point. Eye^. Anterior and posterior laterals forming a rectangle, the height of which U equal to two fifths the b ise. Ant-laterals oval, largest ; p jst- centrals near the post laterals; ant-centrals ia a line aboat f from bise of rectangle. Legs 4, 1,2,3. L ibium, trapezoidal, shorter thaa broad at base. Maxillse extending forward not quite so muc;h in proportion as in Nidivalvata. See fig 12, Plate V. Mandibles, half or more than half as long a3 ceph'x slightly kneed in front of mirgin of caput, aroaed with a strong faog. Inner edge only of groove for reception of fang armed with short teeth; Iront of mandible, on the inside of the insertion offmg < rawn out into a three cornered toothed pr jection, much as in Pa':hylomerus, but a little smaller ; short teth along anterior half of inner upper eJge of mandibles, and few at base of fang. Abdomen elongate, cylindrical, tapering gently to each end. Spinnerets 4, upper pair medium size and length. I have been somewhat in doubt about placing this genus in the subfamily Eriodontuiae, as it has some affinities with members of the subfamily Theyaphosince, division JEpice- phali. But I think, after a comparison of the maxillae, with those of Cteniza, Nemesia, and Eiui/pelma, some species of which have a prolongation of the inner distal end, that the character of the maxillae would place it in the subfamily Eriodontuiae. If, however, it should prove to belong to the Theraphosinae, it would constitute a genus related with, Aepycephalus, Cteniza^ Cytocarenum^ and CyrtaucJienius, in the ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 47 group Aepycephali. It can, however, be separated easily from these genera by the following characters/ Aepyeephahis. ' Head high and somewhat pointed, ceph'x broad as long, side e}es form a trap-zium, lip broad as long, etc." Vteniza "Side eyes from a trapeziimi. Lip somi what three cornered, spinnerets short ami thick Abdomen great, eggforme 1, etc." Cyrlocfirenum. ' Ceph'x as m ( ^e7ai:a ; but head broader in front. Eyes occupy whole breadth of head, a'^dom ;n and spinnerets as in Cienua, etc." Ci/r(auchenhis. "Foim of Ceph'x, ana position ol eyes as in Oyrioca- rertLtn^ maadibits nut drawn int) a point, etc." As the nesting and food habits singularly resemble those of members of the genus Nemesia, and the form of the abdo- men also, it might be confounded with that genus, which be- longs to the group of TherapJiosinae called Tajn/ioccpludr^ as Nemesiai, as being related to the genera above mentioned represents the passage from the Aepycephali to the Tapino- cephalL The generic characters given by Ausserer*'' however easily distinguished it. JVcmeMi, "Head h)W, little elevated above the thorax. Depression with the concavity behind " The specimen of Nemesia caementaria which I saw in the Museum of the Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist, is readily distin- guished generically from this. 1 . Myrmekiaphila f oliata, n. sp. female 5 specimens. (PI. V, figs. 6, 7, 12, 14, and 2z ) In addition to the generic chiracters are the following specihc charac- t-TS Anterior ceotr il eyes'* situate 1 from each other aboui t)ne diameter. Posterior lateral eyes a little larger than the ant-centrals. Post-centrals slightly angulated a little smaller ihan the ant-centials, each one about a diim^iter distant from the correspondinij: post lateral, and situated a very litle cephalad of the base of rectangle bounding the lateral eye?. Ant centrals on point of hill higher than tbe others. Ant-laterals lowest; th^se and the post-laterals situated at bnse of the low hill for the eyes. Legs of one of largest specimens. 4th, 21 mm. 3d, 14^ mm. 2d, 16 mm 1st, 17 mm., palpus il 5 mm. Ceph'x 9x7 mm. In the anterior radial lines, on each side of the caput is an elongated shallow depression. Two lateral radials on each side show a long, nar- row, shallow depression, post radials indistinct in some Edges of ceph'x slightly crenate, and showing shaUow, irregul-ir depressions: posterior margin emarginate. Caput 3.5 mm. elevated above thorax. Sternum 5 mm. long by 3.75 mm. broad, broadest part one-third dis- tance from posterior end, distinctly angled. Labium slightly tmarginate. Abdom m 10 mm. long by 7 mm .broad. Armilure. Very few hairs, more perciptible on abdomen, and still more so on th i three and four cistal joints of the legs, where the hairs are > Beitroege zur Kenntniss der Territtlariae, Auss pp. 150. 151, 152, 156 and 161. 2 Beitraege zur Kenntniss der Teirit-lariae, Auss. p. 165. ^ It seems unnecessary to repeat the description of the eyes so far as given for the genus. Soma variation should, however, be allowed for other species which may be found. 48 JOURNAL OF THE darker. Tarsus IV one or two spines on anterior side. Metatarsus IV with four or five long spines on under side, distal end 1 or 2 near centre. Tibia IV with scattered stiffhairs. Patella IV, upper and anterior side with numerous slender spine-^, With quite a strong base. A broad long- itudinal denuded space on upper side, divides this pach of hairs Femur IV with a numbi-r of spines on distal upper end. Tarsus III, 2 spines on under side. Metatarsus III, 1 or 2 spines on under, distal end, 1 or 2 more nrar middle ; two rows 3 or 4 ppints each on upper anterior, and posterior ed^e Upper surface of tibia and patella III, covered with spines, which are divided into two patches by an oblique, denuded, nar- row space. Tibia III, shorter than patella III. Tardus II, 1 or 2 spines on posterior under edg'^ ; mcatarsus II and I with 2 or 3 spines on under, distal end, and 2 or three near middle. Dense row of hairs on anterior arid posterior side of taisus and metatarsus I; palpus, tarsus as in I; tibia with spine on under distal en i, and one or two near middle Labium separated from sternum by a deep furrow. Maxillae and labium v/ith very short, brown, strong spines at the oral extremities Colors Ceph'x dull olive with a rufous tioge; legs more decidedly rufous, except the femora which are piler atid indi-tinctly tinged with yreen. Mandbl-^s, sternum, maxillae and labium decid -dly rufous. Ends of mandibles darker Ocular prominence black; posterior eyes li^ht; otr ers usually black. Abdomen dull yellowish; broad longitudinal dortal band of delicate brown, from which branch on each side 7 bands (if samf^ color, extending down midway of abdomen. Above colors from a coholic specimens. Id some specimens the alcohol has entirely effaced the foliation on the abdomen, but it was distinct in all the specimens when a'ive. When alive the femora were of a delicate light, olive green. Subfamily THERAPHOSIN^. Group ^picephali I. Genus FACIIYLOMERUS Ausserer. "Cephnlotliorax nur wenig Unger a's breit, lang, nach hinten allmaeh- lij; abfallend. Die halbkreisfoermige, nach vorn geoeffnete Rueckengrube etwas hochliegend, da von hier der Thorax nach hinten noch fast unter demselben Winkel sich abdacht wie der K<»pf, wsehrend bei verwandten Gattungen hlnter der Grube der Th- rax fast horizontal verlseuft. — Augen ctwas gedrsengt, auf niedrigem Huegel. Die vier ovalen Seitenaugen die groessten, mitsammen ein Rechtecfe bildend, dessen Hoehe gleich der halben Bisis. V^rdere Mittelaugen hoher sr^hend als die Seitenaugen. Mandibles stark, wenig loenger als hoch, in eine mit Dornen bewaffnete Spitze vorgezogen. Falzrand beiderseits mit einer Reihe starker Zsehne bewaffnet. Lippe so lang, als am Grunde breit, vorn zugespitzt. Die Extremiiseten der bei 'en Hinterpaare auffallend verdickt, ihre Schenkel in der untern Haelfte baucbig aufgetrieben. Tibia III kurzer als Patella III, oben an der Wurzel mit tiefem Eindrucke. Die beiden vorderen Fusspaare und die Pa'p n female etwas schwach, ihre beiden Endglieier untt-n Hach and beidfr?eits mit einem breiten Bande kurzer, st>rker, di htgedraengTt-r Stacheln bewaffnet. Abdomen maessig gross, eiformig, Spinnwarzen vier, etwas dick und kurz,'' Ausserer takes P. glaber Dall, as type of this genus and says "ob die uebrigen vorLneufig hiereingereihten Arten wirk- lich hierher gehoeren, lasst sich bei den etwas mangelhaften Beschreibungen nicht mit voUer Sicherheit bestimmen.'" ' Beitrsege zur Kenntniss der Territelariae,Auss., p. 145 and 146. ^ Idem, p. 146. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 49 P. carolinensis Hentz, was one of those to which he refers. I think he was right in placing it in this genus, but for the relative position of the eyes, aud some slight difference in the form of the labium there should be allowed some varia- tion in generic character, which he undoubtedly would have done, had he the opportunity to see the specimens. 1. Pachylomerus carabivorus, n. sp female. 5 specimens, (Plate V, figs 1 and 4, and 20.) Eijes. AnteriMi and posterior la'erals 'orming a trapezium; base '>f which formed by the po,-t-laterals one-fifth longer than the opposite side. Height about one-third of base. Vii.-w of eyts taken perpendicularly to a plane parallel with the ventral surf ce of the ceoh'x. With this view the ant- and po-t lateral eyes app ar elliptical in outline; but viewed from a point toward whi h each eye may be said to ' look" they are nearly circular n utline, ani app.-^ar like "dormer windows," from the arched portion of the caput for each one. Fig. 3, Plate V , rep-esents position aud re'ative size of the eyes as s^en from the v ew exi lained above ; the arrows indicate the direction from which ihe greater number of rays of light enter the eyes. Aline through the center of the ant cen- tral eyes would pas=i a little above a line half way betw een the base and O! posite side of the trapezium ; ant-centr^ls are s-ituated trom each other, and from the ant-later% s about one diameter; receive the raj s of light directly from above. Post-lateral eyes in line with base of trapezium, or a trifle anter'or in some specimens, receive the rays of light from a point ciudo-dor^al. Ant-lateral, largest, ant-central and post-1 tteral of about equal size, post-central smallest, though in one specimen they are of equal size with the ant-central and po.-t- lateral. Ceph'x a liitle longer than bnwd at widest pa^^. In one specimen 9 mm. X 8 25 mm., anoth' r 11 mm x 10 mm.,.&c, U-shaped ('epression situa'ed about two-thirds of the distance from the ant' rior margin of the caput. Base of ceph'x 3.5 mm; posterior angles quite sharply defined; Literal edg'% from posterior angle to point of greate-t width, straight Greate-t height of ceph'x, 6 mm. Mandibles 3 5 mm. long x 3 mm. dc-p. Abdomen 12 mm. long, whole leng h of spider 24 5 mm. Legs: 1st, 16 mm; 2d, 15.25 mm ; 2rd 15-25 mm ; 4th, 19 5 mm. These aie meajure- ments taken from one individual. In some the legs are 4, 1, 2, 3. Armature. The legs have few hairs, though more abundant on tibia, metatarsus and tirsus, of all the legs, and patella III and IV. Patella iV on sides of proximal half covered with very short sp'nes. Anterior side of metatarsus and tarsus IV slender spines; a few spines on under side, distal end of tibia IV. Trochanter III with a short papilla. Anterior side and upper distal end o* patella III, whole upper surtare of metatarsus III, and oistal end of tibia III, covered with short, strong, black spines. On upper side of proximal end of metatarsus III is an elongated denuded spot, which seems to be the miniature of the smooth depression at proximal end of tibia III; tarsus III with few spines. Tibia, mttat'-irsus and tarsus of II and I. and tibia and tarsus of palpus, with dense row of short, strong, Mack s- pines on anterior and posterior sides Sternum with f.w hairs on c^ge, longer than broad, in one specimen 6.25 mm. by 5.75 mm., Sharply angled between the articulation of the coxse; greatest breadth between coxae II and III. Maxilla? longer than coxa I ; at edge of base a clustered row of short, strong, brown spines; densely hairy with rufous hairs on anterior edge. Labium broadest at base, distal end truncate, anterior angles well 50 JOURNAL OF THE rounded ; as long or nearly as long as broad at base ; armed near distal end with a few spines similar to those on the maxilla- ; separated from the sternum by a deep furrow. Colors. When alive. Ceph'x and legs def'p glossy black. Abdomeu light brown End- cf ma < ibU s, hairs in end of mandible<^, and on anterior edtfe of maxillie reddish. P-tclla IV alo reddish on upper sur- face. Under par s iigher colored. M» mb nne CuULecting legs to ceph'x a» d the joiuts of the legs whitish. When placed in alcohol thf glossy black after a while disappears, and becomes a dark rufous brown, ends of legs remaining darker because of the presence of numerous v«.ry short, black spines. Pachylomerus carabivorus. var. emarginatus, n. var. (fema'e 1 specimen.) This seems to te a varietal form of P. carabivorus, Labium trapezoirlal, anterior corners rounded ; shorter than broad at base. Ceph'x nearly as broad as long, 10 mm. long Marginal configuration as in P. cara- bivorus, except that the posterior margin is strongly emarginate. Wh le upper portion of cepii'x seeriis to be elevated, showing quite a breadth of membrane which c nnects it with the cox.ie. Middle portion of caput, perceptibly elevat' d and broadened a 1 ttle caulad ol the eyes. Leg-*: 4 h, 23.5 mm; 3rd. 19.25 ri.m; 2d, 18.5 mm; 1st, 20 mm In fnmt of ihe U-sliaptd depressi 14. 9. 8. 10. 13. 11. 15. 16. Ceph'x of Fachylomerus carahivorrs c woiinfriais . u >( {( (( n u u u t( (.1 <( 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23 Fig Eyes of carabivorus. turris. Myrmekiaphila foliata, dorsal view. eyes of. maxill " of side vi^^w. Nidivalvata ma rxii, dorsal view. eyes of. maxillae of. " '* side view. " an^iisiafa^ nest of. Nest of Myrmek'Kiphihi. folkda ; dotted line at a represents bottom of place where stone lay. Spdce represented by dotted lin s a and (7, niuch f re-shortened ; />, where spider was caught; <\ trap door. Nest of My) mekiaphUa foliata in an ant's nest; o^', landing in ant's nest, hading off into galleries; />, entrance u> ant's nest, d, tube of spider ; c, trap-door. N» st of yidivalvaia marxii, open. " " " " closed. Palpal claw fema'e, of P. r.arolincnsis. " " .« *t p carabivoi'us. Palpal claw of P 4i-spino8us. " " female of M. foliata. " " " " N. marxii. 3. 1, 3, 6, 9, 13 and 14, about nrtural size. SOME NEW SALTS OF CAMPHORIC ACID. I. H. MANNING. Although this acid has been known for over one hundred years, comparatively few of its salts have been prepared and studied. The present work was undertaken with a view of extending this list, but was interrupted before very many additions could be made. The camphoric acid was prepared, according to the direc- tions of Wreden, by dissolving 150 grams of camphor in 2 litres of nitric acid, sp. gr., 1.27, and heating the solution 50 hours on the water bath. The liquid was then satuated with sodium carbonate, filtered, neutralized with hydrochloric ^.jV fi,^.Ji ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 53 acid, and the separated camphoric acid purified by crys- tallizing from water. The yield was about the same as that obtained by Wreden, when great care was exercised in the purification by crystallizing fi'om water. The pure crystals gave the melting point \y6°c. (uncorrected). A ten percent, solution of caustic potash was saturated with camphoric acid and the solution of potassium camphorate so obtained was used in preparing the other compounds. Manganese Camphorate. When a few drops of potassium camphorate were added to a nearly saturated solution of manganese sulphate in a small watch-glass, no precipitate was formed until it had been heated on the water-bath. A white amorphous precipitate was then gotten, which was easily soluble in cold water. This could always be repre- cipitated on heating. In preparing the salt on a larger scale the mixture of potassium camphorate and manganese sulphate was heated to precipitation and the precipitate well washed with hot water. The precipitate was then dried at 100°. If exposed in the moist condition it showed browning. There was a slight discoloration even when rapidly dried. At 150° decomposition was very slight; at 200° it was marked. When some of the purified manga- nese camphorate was dissolved in water and evaporated over sulphuric acid a crust of the salt was obtained, but no crystal. I. .2790 grammes of su' stance gave .0859 primines, Mn304 II. .4460 " " " " 1"80 III 4875 " ' " " .1330 landlU was determi'ei precipitjtiou as carliouate, II by ignition. p. c. Mn. ca'c f.)und Mn. Ci„H,,0, 23 07 1.22.07 11.21.39 III. 22.50 As it was very difficult to wash away all of the potassium camphorate the low results are probably due to the presence of the same as an impurity. Chromium Camphorate. On adding potassium campho- rate to a solution of chromium sulphate a heavy precipitate of a biuish-green color is formed. This is not very soluble and can be thoroughly washed with cold water. It can be dried at ioo°c. losing all water at this temperature. Before reach- ing 150° slow decomposition sets in. Analysis. I. 4280 gratnm'S of substance yi Ided on ignifon .0810 grra. Cr-j O3 II. 16870 " " * " •' " .134J " C'-o O, calc found in I. found in II. Or2 (Dio Hn 04)3 P.O. Cr 14 81 1^5 93 14 40 The Sample in I w as different fi om that in II and evidently nut so pure. * 54 JOURNAL OF THE Ferric Camphorate. A strong solution of ferric chloride was precipitated with potassium camphorate, a bulky yel- lowish precipitate was formed, quite insoluble in water and hence easily washed. This gave on drying at ioo° a buft- yellow powder. An analysis of this powder gave the per- centage of iron as 19.34. The calculated percentage for F^2 (^10 H,4 OJs is 15.86, This powder was then probably a subcamphorate. It was treated once more with a moderately strong solution of ferric chloride and again thoroughly washed. Analysis of this gave p.c. Fe=" 18.84 ^^id 18.90. Mercuric Camphorate. A white heavy precipitate is formd in a. concentrated solution of mercuric chloride on adding potassium camphorate. This was washed thoroughly and dried at ioo°c. It forms a heavy white powder. Analysis. I. .4400 gramme of substance jielded .2150 grammes Fg. II. .3ci40 " " " " .1920 calculated found in I. in II- Hg. 50.25 4«86 50.00 ClO H14 O4 Chem. Laboratory, U. N. C. DECOMPOSITION OF POTASSIUM CYANIDE. I. n. MANNIJIG. Under the head of "Condensation of hydrocyanic acid" (Berichteder, d. chem. Ges. 18,1875) von der Pfordten dis- cusses the discoloration produced in solutions of potassium cyanide by the addition of free acids, or of certain salts, or by simple heating the cyanide alone. This phenomenon was examined and studied to a certain extent by Mr. Wilkes in the first number of our journal (p. 19.) Herr von der Pfordten speaks of the decomposition of the cyanide on heat- ing some hours in a test-tube placed in a water bath, as being due "probably to the long continued action of the carbon dioxide of the air." That this could not be the case was shown by Mr. Wilkes, who proved that the decomposition took place in the cold with all carbon dioxide carefully excluded. The following experiment were undertaken to test th^ conclusion of Mr. Wilkes: I. A saturated or nearly saturated solution of pure po- tassium cyanide was placed in a tube which was then sealed. Only a very nimute amount of carbon dioxide could have been present, yet the various changes of color were observed and after some weeks the liquid had become black and a blackish deposit had formed. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY- 55 2. A similarly prepared tube was placed in boiling water; within five minutes a change to brownish-red was noticed, and the color lapidly darkened with the exposure, 3. A similarly prepared tube was fitted with cork and tubes, and while it was in the boiling water carbon dioxide was introduced. The changes were noticed very much as in experiment 2; apparently they were slightly delayed rather than hastened. 4. Into a tube prepared as in 3, hydrogen was passed in a rapid continuous stream. The changes were greatly delayed and no very deep discoloration was obtained. 5. If experiment 3 is so reversed that the carban dioxide is passed above a cold solution of the cyanide, giving oppor- tunity for its absorption, the change of color is rapid and deep. From these experiments the conclusion can be drawn that though carbon dioxide hastens the decomposition of the cyanide, as any free acid would do, yet it is not essential for this decomposition. Chem. Laboratory, U. N. C. LEAD CHLOE^SULPHO-CYANIDE. R G. GRISSOM. This new compound of lead can be easily prepared by acting on lead chloride with a strong solution of potassium sulpho-cyanide. Freshly precipitated and recry.stallized lead chloride was covered with a solution of potassium sulpho-cyanide in excess, and allowed to stand for several days. The liquid was then poured off and the residue treated several times with boiling water until all was dis- solved. This fractional solution was carried out to separate, if possible, substances of different solubility. The fractions rapidly deposited crops of crystals on cooling, but examina- tion under the microscope showed that these crystals were identical in crystalline form. Analyses were made as follows : .6220 gram, of subs-ance gave 5730 gram Pb SO, or 68.57 per ct Pb 1.0280 't » " '•' .7047 " " 0168.55 " " " For chlorine and sulphocyanic acid 1.0700 grammes of the substance was dissolved in water and precipitated with silver nitrate. This was filtered and treated with strong nitric acid thus oxidizing the sulpho-cyanide. After dilution it was again filtered. The silver chloride was burned and the sulphuric acid determined in the filtrate in the usual way. 56 JOURNAL OF THE 1.0700 gram'5. of pubstanoe vielded .1321 rrams. of AgCe or 12.34 per ct. CI and .8440 grams Ba ^O, or 19 62 perct CNS calc. found Pbo 68 46 68 57 68.55 CI2 1191 12 34 (0^S)2 19.41 - 19.63 The formula for the compound then is PbCl^. Pb(CNSX. There is no water of crystalHzation and the substance can be he.ited to 150° without decomposition. The solution poured off from the original lead chlor- sulpho-cyanide yielded mainly crystals of potassium chloride, together with some unchanged potassium sulpho-cyanide. The potassium sulpho-cyanide used was freshly prepared and purified by frequent recrystallization. It is proposed to pursue farther the study of these double compounds of lead in the laboratory here. Chem. Laboratory, U. N. C. SOLUBILITY OF ALUMIN'A. IN SULPHURIC ACID. R G GRTSSOM. Ordinary commercial alumina is not very easily acted on by sulphuric acid, and this solubility varies very decidedly with the strength of the acid. The following experiments were undertaken to determine at what concentration the acid has the most powerful solvent action. The sulphuric acid used contained 95.25 per ct. H, SO,. Ten grams of alumina were put in a 200 c. c. flask, and the mixture of sulphuric acid and water (cold) poured upon it. A series of such flasks were heated to 30° for one hour. The contents were then largely diluted and filtered as rapidly as possible into looo c. c. flasks. The alumina was then deter- mined in duplicate, using 25 c. c. for each determination. c-c. » C. K tio lii soive'i Dis -solved No. H, SO4 5-4 H2O H^SO, to H2O AI2 'sSO^C A'203 100° c. I 0 20:1 1 1.6100 3.9300 2 5-4 I 4:1 1.2400 3 5-4 2.3 2:1 1.6000 4 5-4 4-9 1:1 2.76CO 5.2800 5 5-4 1 0.0 1:2 3.1200 6 54 15. 1 1-3 3.1800 5.8400 7 5-4 20.3 1:4 3.2000 8 5-4 25.4, 1:5 3.2400 6.0600 9 108 61. 1 1:6 3.5200 10 10.8 81.7 1:8 3.2400 II 10.8 102.3 1:10 2.6900 5.5200 ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 57 In the last column Nos. i, 4, 6, 8 and 11, only were re- peated and in the first four cases 10.8 c. c. acid were used, as this amount suited better the weight of alumina taken and the size of the flask. These experiments of course do not determined the absolute solubility of alumina in sulphuric acid. The temperature and length of exposure are both fac- tors in the solution. They serve to show soley to what extent it is advisable to dilute the acid in order to bring about the greatest solvent action. The best ratio of dilution seems to be 1:5 or 1:6. Chem. Laboratory, U. N. C. ANALYSIS OF WATER FROM THE ARTESIAN WELL AT DURHA]VI, N. 0. As this is the only deep artesian well in this State, it seemed of interest to have an analysis of the mineral matter held in solution by its water. A carefully drawn sample of this water was therefore analized. The .sample was drawn during the summer of 1885, about five gallons being sealed in a new and clean demijohn and sent to this laboratory, under the direction of Mr. J. S. Carr. The analysis resulted as follows : In one kilogram of the water, K30 .00817 grammes. NasO .02352 4i CaO .06160 l< MgO .01717 u FeO .02400 i< S0« .00446 li 01 .03412 l< SiO^ .06200 « Total solids .2240 (i Or expressed in grains per gallons. Potassium chloride 29 grains Sodium chloride 8.84 Sodium sulphate .42 Ferrous bic-.rbona'e, 31 • Oalcium ibic;irbo(.ate 11.43 Magn siuni bicarbonate 3.65 Total solids by evaporation, 18.86 This well is drilled through the older Mesozoic rocks. Ac- cording to Mr. O. R. Smith, who had charge of the work, the drilling was stopped at 1,650 feet without reaching over- flowing water.. The cutting was mainly through sandstone, and at. different depths brine and traces of oil and gas were S8 JOURNAL OF THE struck. A sixty pound charge of dynamite was exploded in the hope of increasing the supply of water and by this the well was blocked up to within 528 feet of the surface. At- tempts at drilling through these obstructions failed, and the explosion of an additional ten pound charge of dynamite brought about no good results. An iron casing was there- fore let down to this depth, and the water analized was pumped from the 528 feet well. F. P. Venable. Chcm. Laboratory, U. N. C. THE FERTILIZER TRADE IN NORTH CAROLMA IN 1886- W. B. PHILLIPS. About 100,000 tons of Commercial Fertilizers are used in North Carolina annually, sold by 58 companies under 90 brands. Each brand pays an annual license tax of ^500.00. Since the establishment of the Agric. Dept. in 1877, and the inauguration of the fertilizer control by the Agric. Expt. and Fert. Control vStation, the number of brands and con- sumption of Commercial Fertilizers has shown a marked increase. Brands of Fertilizers entered and amounts consumed from 1879 to 1886, inclusive: Oomsnruption- short. tona. 60,000 80.000 85,000 92,000 95,000 95,000 95.000—100,000 95,000—100,000 Each brand is subject to analysis at the Expt. Station, and the figures allowed for available Phosphoric Acid. (Soluble and Reverted.") Ammonia and Potash at the sea-board are as follows: Gents per pound. Available Ph( sphoric Acid, 7^^ AmmoDia, 16 Potash, (K2O) 6 Accapting these figures agreed upon by the State Chefrt- i8t$ of North and South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama Brands. 1879. 42 1880. 48 1881. 58 1882. 86 1883. 92 1884. 80 1885. 83 18S6. 90 ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 59 the following table will show the commercial valuation of the ammoniated super -phosphates ivith potash ("complete fertilizer") from 1880 to 1886, inclusive, as given in the 1886 report of the N. C. Expt. Station, page 21. 1880 per ct 1882 per ct. 1883 per ct. 1884 per ct. 1885 per ct. 1886 per ct. Aviiilable Pho3. Acid 7.40 2.70 13U 8.91 2fi0 1.82 8 59 2 33 .218 1^22.53 8.15 2.67 2.13 9.13 2.65 2 34 8 96 Amajonia 2.53 Potash 2.30 Valuation on 1886 basis $21.04^*23 51 122 90 $24 52 $28.44 The following table will show where the brands used in North Carolina are manufactured, (Rep. N. C. Expt Station, i8«6, p. 21). Massachusetts. . Connecticut. . . . New York. . . . New Jersey Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania.. . Virginia North Carolina. South Carolina. Total 1880 1881 1882 18»3 1884 1885 2 3 .^_ 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 3 3 3 6 5 3 2 4 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 21 25 45 1 15 42 1 17 30 31 ! '^ 9 20 18 3 3 6 6 8 9 5 6 9 14 12 11 57 59 86 92 80 85 1886 1 1 3 8 4 35 1 21 10 11 90 6o JOURNAL OF THE The following table shows the amounts of Kainit, Guano, Phosphate and Phosphate Rock received at the Port of Wil- mington, N. C, from January ist to December 31st, of each year. 1 Pbosph ite Kainit. j Guano. Phosphate. Rock. Year Imported from Tons Value Tons Value Tons Value Tons Value 1877 Germany . . . 1,200 fl0,548 $ $ $ 1878 Germany . . . 300 2,098 1879 Germany . . . 1.257 9,262 1880 Germany . . . 3,068 14,894 1880 Nova Scotia 600 615 1881 Germany.. . 3,334 23,696 (Rock 564 1882 Germany . . 6,867 43,219 ■{ Plaster 1882 England. . . . 325 18,414 400 7,283 I 500 1883 Germany . . . 8,220 54,619 1884 Germany . 13,348 82,503 1884 England 950 23,809 1885 Germany . . . 9,084 62,851 1885 England. .. 980 10,760 1.20a 15,113 1886 England, ,. . 76 2,493 745 8,752 1886 France 855 48,178 1886 Germany.. . 13,042 91,776 Total 59720 $395566 2236 183844 3295 $54957 600 Rock Plaster 550 t6l5 S564 In addition there is brought into Wilmington from outside the United States, about 5,000 tons of Navassa Phosphate Rock annually, costing, f o. b., about ;$7.0o, from the Navassa Island, West Indies, all of which is consumed by the Navassa Guano Company of Wilmington. One cargo of 500 tons Roncador Island Phosphate Rock was brought into Wil- mington in February 1885, but the venture was not success- ful, and no more has been brought. Production of Fertilizers in North Carolina in 1886. Location. Product Company. Guano short tons A'd Phosphate short tons. Gr'd Rock nhort tons Navassa Guano. . . . Acme Manufacturing Goldsboro Oil Wilmington, Wilmington - Cronly Goldsboro 6000 2152 2250 1000 1000 10000 N. C. Phosphate .... French Bro.'s Raleigh est'd 500 Rockv Point 900 Enterprise Fertilizer Durham Fertilizer . . Tarboro, estimated . . Total 12402 10000 140) ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 6i The value of these products can not be stated exactly, but will be very nearly given by the following figures: Value of fertilizers produced in North Carolina in 1886. 12,402 tons Guano - 1^23.00 1^285,246 10,000 tons Acid Phosphate 14.00 140,000 1,400 tons Ground Rock 9.00 12,600 23,802 " Fertilizers valued at - ^437,846 It must, however be noted here that some of the companies buy acid Phosphate of North Carolina make, mix it with cotton-seed meal or other ammoniate and sell it as Guano. It is difficult to say exactly how much acid phosphate is thus counted twice, first as acid phosphate, the company selling it as such, and then by the purchaser as Guano after it has been dry mixed with some ammoniate. But there is reason for believing that this would not exceed 1,500 tons of the acid phosphate, corresponding to about 2,500 tons guano. A fair allowance would be 1,500 tons to be subtracted from the guano out-put. The preceding table would then stand corrected as follows : 12,402 tons Guano less 1,500 tons — 10,902 tons Guano at - $23.00 ;^250,746 10,000 tons Acid Phosphate at 14.00 140,000 1,400 tons Ground Rock at 9.00 12,000 22,000 tons fertilizers valued at ;^403,346 The 1,400 tons Ground Rock is not counted twice as it is North Carolina Phosphate Rock, Phosphate Conglomerate, etc., raised in the State, and sold as "fine ground " without being acidulated or ammoniated. By reference to the table of production it will be seen that two companies make a speciality of " fine ground " Rock, French Bros at Rocky Point, Pender county, and the North Carolina Phosphate Company at Raleigh. French Bros, have been in the business for several years, mining and grinding their own rock from contiguous de- posits. The rock is a phosphatic conglomerate, a mass of phosphatic pebbles and nodules in a cement of carbonate of lime. It is burnt in kilns, screened, and the residue ground. This residue may contain : Phosphate of Lime - - 20.34 per cent. Lime, as oxide and hydrate 37.52 per cent. 62 JOURNAL OF THE (For further information as to this see under "General Ob- servations.") Owing to insufficient machinery this company has not been able to place as much of their product on the market as they expect to do before long. The ground rock has a good reputation as a fertilizer. The North Carolina Phosphate Company at Raleigh uses this rock also, obtaining it from Castle Hayne near Rocky Point They have a very complete mill, with a Foster crusher, and two Frisbee-Lucop grinders, and are doing an increasing business, with a daily capacity of thirty tons. Besides these two companies there are none that use North Carolina rock. NAVASSA GUANO CO., WILMINGTON, N. C ; works at Meares Bluff, Cape Fear river, five miles above Wil- mington, established in 1 869, and do the largest business of any company manufacturing in North Carolina. They use 1 1 ,000 tons of crude rock per annum, of which 5,000 tons is Navassa and 6,000 tons South Carolina Rock. Their daily capacity is Ground Rock - - - 33 tons Acid Phosphate - - - /o tons Guano - - - - 75 tons Total 178 tons. Of their total production of 16,000 tons, they sell in North Carolina 10,000 tons. They make their own acid from Sicily Sulphur, and are well equipped and well situated. ACME MANUFACTURING CO., WILMINGTON, N. C. works at Cronly, on Carolina Central Railway, 17 miles from Wilmington. The year ending December i, 1886, is really their first year in the business, as they were experimenting and getting ready. They use South Carolina rock, and have a daily capacity of Ground Rock, - - 15 tons. Acid Phosphate - - 30 tons. Guano - - - 60 tons. Total 105 tons. They make their own acid from Sicily Sulpher, and are well equipped, though not very well situated. They sell nearly all their product in North Carolina. The Goldsboro Oil Co., the Enterprise Fertilizer Co., ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY- 63 (Tarboro), and the Durham Fertilizer Co., buy Acid Phos- phate, and 'dry-mix' their own Guano. THE PRESENT OUTLOOK IN NORTH CAROLINA. Opinions vary. Some think the prospect fair, others are inclined to take rather despondent views. Fertilizers have declined in price, and the $500 tax is not popular. There has been little or no mining of the regular North Carolina Phosphate Rock (containing 20-22 per cent. Phosphoric acid), for the reason that it lies in 'pockets' some- what widely separated, and the topography of the region is unfavorable for cheap mining. As long as Charleston, S. C Rock guaranteed to run 55 per cent. Bone Phosphate (25,19 per cent. Phosphoric acid) can be bought f. o. b. for $$.$0 to $6.50, there is but little prospect of the North Carolina Rock coming mto market in any quantity. The first systematic investigation of this Rock was made by W. B. Phillips in September, 1883, at the request of the Navassa Guano Company. In his report to that company, published in pamphlet form (" North Carolina Phosphates October, 1883") he took the ground that the steepness of the slopes on the sides of most of the little streams where the rock occurs would necessitate an excessive amount of dig- ging, with proportional increase of expense, which the low grade of the rock would not repay. In march 1884, appeared the Report of the Experiment Station on North Carolina Phosphates, and since that time numerous references have been made to the matter in the publications of the Station, and of the Agricultural Department. While the rock makes an excellent quality of acid Phos- phate it remains to be seen whether it can compete with Charleston Rock. So far it has not competed, for the reason that none of it has been offered. As to how soon, if at all, it will be offered.is a very obscure question, and one which time, and it may be a good deal of it, alone can answer. As to the other raw materials for the manufacture of fertilizers, viz : fish-Hcrcqj and cotton .seed meal as nitrogenous matter, pyrites as source of sulphuric acid, and hones, the following may be said : FISH, OIL, AND SCRAP MILLS, There are seven (7) in the State, three (3) of fair capacity, and four (4) small. P^mployment is given from April to November, to about 400 men, and the yearly value of the oil and scrap is about ;$ 150,000. 64 JOURNAL OF THE The amount of North Carolina fish-scrap bought by the Navassa Guano Company in two years, ending February 5, 1885, was about 3,500 bags (140 tons), and they buy most of the scrap made in the State. This will give 1,700 bags (75 tons) per annum, w^hich is perhaps rather less than the real production. The true figures will fall not far short of lOO tons. Good scrap should yield 10 per cent, ammonia on 10 per cent, water. The account w^ill stand. One hundred tons fish scrap lO per cent., a ;^2.50 per unit, ;^2500. About one-third (fA,) of this is made at the mouth of the Cape Fear River, and the other two-thirds on Pam- lico Sound, around Beaufort. The industry might be greatly enlarged, as there is always a good market for the scrap. GOTTON SEED OIL MILLS There are nine in the State, with a total capacity in seed of 200 tons daily. A ton (2000 lbs.) of seed should yield 800 pounds of cake. The cake is worth $2.50 per unit of Ammonia, and should run 8.5 per cent. It is not know what proportion of the cake made goes into fertilizers, probably not above 4,000 tons. The product of two average size mills (the Acme and Goldsboro) is almost entirely used in this way. PYRITE3. None mined for sulphuric acid. All the acid used in the manufacture of the fertilizers is made from Sicily Sulphur. BONES. Bones are collected, but only in a small way. There is at Salem a small mill for grinding bones, and the Navassa Guano Company buys them from local dealers in small lots. The total quantity is hardly above lOO tons per annum, and so we have lOO tons Bones a ;$io, ;^ 1,000. MARL. The use of marl is local, and confined almost entirely to the Eastern part of the State. Very little, if any, is shipped by rail, each neighborhood using what is convenient, and easily transported by wagons. This is to be regretted, as the heavy clay soils of the middle part of the State would respond very readily to such an applicatiou. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS. The most marked feature of the fertilizer trade in North Carolina in 1886, was the increased demand for fine ground I ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 65 phosphate rock. The new mill at Raleigh was built to sup- ply this demand, and the steady growth of the sales is an indication of the esteem in which the product is held. An analysis of the article made at the Experiment Station is as follows: Analysis of Ground North Carolina Phosphate Rock : ' Bone Phosphate - - 1 1. 16 per cent. Carbonate of Lime - - 64.26 per cent. Magnesia - - - 0.81 per cent. Potash - - - - 0.40 per cent. Water - - - . - 1.39 per cent. The fine ground rock offered by French Bros, is of a somewhat higher grade. An analysis of their best grade is as follows : ' Phosphate of Lime - - 20.34 per cent Carbonate of Lime - - Lime as Oxide and Hydrate - 37-52 per cent Oxides oflron and aluminum, and loss 5.65 percent This analysis represents the composition of the residue from burning and screening. The composition before burning and screening is as follows : ' Phosphate of Lime - - 16.42 per cent. Carbonate of Lime - - ' - 54.71 percent. Lime as oxide and hydrate Oxides oflron and Aluminum, and loss 3.91 percent. The burning and screening separates the phosphatic nodules from the cement of carbonate of lime and converts this last into lime oxide and hydrate. All three of these articles are growing in favor with the farmers. The utiliza- tion of raw ground rock in the preparation of home-made manures, is one of the reasons why the price of acid phos- phate and guano has declined. Extra inducements in the shape of lower prices have now to be offered since the farmer has discovered that he can buy a good article for nearly 50 per cent, less than he has been accustomed to pay. ^ Equivalent to Phosphoric acid 6.11 per cent. 2 Equivalent to Phosphoric acid 9.31 per cent. '■^ Equivalent to Phosphoric acid 7.52 per cent. 66 JOURANL OF THE Total value of all fertilizing materials made in North Carolina in 1886. 10,902 tons Guano at $23.00 - - $250,746 10,000 tons acid phosphate at 14.00 - - 140,000 1,400 tons Ground Rock at 9.00 - - 12,600 100 tons Fish Scrap at 25.00 - - 2,500 4,000 tons Cotton Seed Meal at 22.00 - - 8,800 100 tons Bones at 10.00 - - 1,000 Total value $494,846 W. B. PHILLIPS. LIST OF EXCHANGES. GEBMANY. Der Naturhistorishe Verein in Bonn. Der Naturwissenschaftliche Verein in Magdeburg. Der Naturwissenschaftliche Verein in Bremen. Berliner Entomologischer Verein. Die Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Danzig. Der Naturwissenschaftliche Verein in Regensburg. Der Naturhistorische Verein in Augsburg. Die Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Frankfurt. SWITZERLAND. Die Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Bern. LaSociete Fribourgeoise des Sciences Naturelles Fribourg FRANCE. La Societe Linneenne, de Normandie. La Societe Linneenne, du Nord de la France, Amiens. ITALY. Socie'^e Toscana di Scienze Naturali in Pisa. Regie Istituto Veneto di Scienze Letture ed Arti, Venice RUSSIA. La Societe Imperiale des Naturalistes, de Moscou. La Societe des Naturalistes de la Nouvelle Russie, Odessa. MEXICO. Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural. GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND. Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society, Halifax England. Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural History Society Dumfries, Scotland. Belfast Natur«^lists Field Qlub, Belfast, Ireland, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 67 CANADA. Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa. Ottawa Field Naturalist's Club. Canadian Institute, Toronto. Nova Scotian Institute of Natural Science, Halifax Natural History Society, Montreal. Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, New Haven Academy of Natural Sciences, Davenport. Kansas Academy of Sciences, Manhattan. National Academy of Sciences, Washington. Peabody Academy of Science, Salem. Society of Natural History, Brookville. Natural Science Association of Staten Island. Science Association, Peoria. * ^ Scientific Association, Meriden, Natur-al History Sr)ciety, Trenton. ( Li nnean Society, New York, ' Academy of Science, St. Louis. I Washington Chemical Soceity. Michigan Horticultural Society. } Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History. Wagner Free Institute of Science, Philadelphia. American Academy of Arts and Science. Western American Scientist. LeanderMcCormick Observatory, University of Virginia Smithsonian Institution, Washington. Washburn College Laboratory of Natural History, Kansas I United States Geological Survey ' j Johns Hopkins University.— Circulars. j Cornell University.— Bulletins. / University of California.— Agricultural Reoorts Modern Language Notes. —Baltimore. Boston Public Library.— Bulletins. N. C. Medical Journal. N. C. Board of Health —Reports. N. C. Department of Agriculture.— Bulletins. UNITED STATES. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. New York Academy of Sciences, New York. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. Elliott Society of Science and Arts, Charleston. Society of Natural History, Cincinnati Minnesota Academy of Natural Science, Minneapolis. WASHINGTON CARUTHERS KERR. JOURNAL OF THE ELISHA ilTCHELL SCIENTIFIC r^ J nm Y, VOLUME IV — PART II. JULY-DE^CKMIBER, 1887, PUBLICATION COMMITTEE R. H. GRAVES, J. A. HOLMES, J. L. LOVE. PERMANENT SECRETARY: F. P. VENABLE, CHAPEL HILL, N. C E. M. UZZELL, STEAM PRINTEU AND IJINDEK. RALEIGH, N. C. 1S87. OFFICERS 1887-1888. PRESIDENT: R. H. Lewis, M. D., Raleijjh, N. C VICE-PRESIDENT : W. L. PoTEAT, Wake Forest, N. C. RESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT: W. B. Phillips, Ph. D., Chapel Hill, N. C. PERMANENT SECRETARY AND TREASURER: F. P. Venable, Ph. D., F. C. S., . . . . Chapel Hill, N. C. RECORDING SECRETARY AND LIBRARIAN: J. W. Gore, C. E., Chapel Hill, N. C. PUBLICATION COMMITTEE : R. H. Graves, C. and M. E., J. A. Holmes, B. Agr., J. L. Love, B. A. LIBRARY AND PLACE OF MEETING: CHAPEL HILL, N. C. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE. Biograpliv of I)i-. W. ('. Kei r. By J. A. Holtnes J The Study of Local Floras. By (ierald McCarthy 25 The Limits (.f the Senses. By F. P. Veiiahle 31 The Elenients, Historically Considered. By V. P. Venable 36 Effect of Decomposing,' Organic Matter on Lisoinble Pli()S{)hate of Lime. By F. B. Dancy 41 Pieliniinary (,'atalo^Mie of the Birds of North Carolina. By (i. F. Atkin- son 44 Singular Ay K. G. Grissom 99 A New Form of Buiisen Burner. By F. P. Venable. 103 A New Test for Iron. By F. P. Venable 105 Electrolysis of Water. By F. B. Venable 105 List of Pa|>ers Read at the Regular Meetings. 107 Public Lectures 108 Use of the Library 108 Publications Received since July, 1887 108 An Index to the First Four Volumes Ill JOURNAL OF THE Elislia Mitchell Scientific Society, A SKETCH OF PROFESSOR WASHINGTON CARUTHERS KERR, M. A., D. Ph. A Lecture before the Mitchell Society, at the University of North Carolina, January 34, 1887, by J. A. Holmes. Mr. President and Gentlemen: The life and work of Professor Kerr is a theme which needs no introduction before members of this society. Probably but few of those here present knew him personally, but in one sense all knew him. He knew North Carolina better than the people of North Carolina knew him; and yet he was quite widely known, both at home and amoug; scientific circles abroad. In travelino: recently through some of the nooks and corners of this State I have been surprised at times to hear him spoken of where I least expected it; and I know that his fellow-geologists in this country have placed a high estimate on his character and on his scientific work. We may be sure of this much at any rate: that wherever in the State there is located a mine of importance, or other valua- ble mineral deposit of any kind, a fine water-power, valuable tracts of timber land, or interesting geological formations — wherever there has been, during these past twenty years, a man who souu;:ht information concerniim: the natural resources and material prosperity of North Carolina — there J*rofessor Kerr's 2 JOUJRXAL OF THE name is a familiar one, and there, especially, during the two years and more since his death, there has been a realization of the fact that the important place he occupied among the people of the State is now vacant. Professor Kerr was in birth, in education (in part) and in his life work closely identified with this State; and, as far as I am aware, he is almost the only native-born North Carolinian who has at yet attained a position of eminence in the ranks of sci- ence. Of the few others belonging to these ranks who have worked in the State, Professors Olmsted and ^litchell were natives of Connecticut, Dr. Von Schweinitz of Pennsylvania, and Drs. Curtis and Emmons of Massachusetts. Washino-ton Caruthers Kerr was born in the Alamance reo:ion of Guilford county, N. C, May 24, 1827, and died in Asheville, Auo;ust 9, 1885. His ancestors were amon:ion. But in this disappointment awaited him. He had but fairly heirun the topoo;ra])liic work when, in vSepteniber, 1883, failing health necessitated his resignation. The disease — catan-h of the digestive organs — which had for so long a time preyed u}>ou him, had now greatly weakened his svstcni. Dui-in*!' the two vears f »llowin ai'dor for the development of" North ("ai'oliua, his anxiety to see her among the fbi'emost in the new raee set before the S(»uth. 'I'he State has never had a more genuinely and sagaciously publie-< cold, according as the preceding sensation was colder or warmer. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 33 We must, then, to decide this matter of temperature, have recurrence to auxiliary appliances, these recording their results throuo-h the sense of si^ht. As achievements in this line we have a mercurial thermometer, reading to the one-thousandth part of a degree, the exceedingly delicate bolometer of Langley, and lastly Vernon Boys' modification of D'ArsonvaPs instru- ment, which he calls the Radiomicrometer. This last measures the one luindrcd-millionth of a degree. In the report of its exhibition before the Royal Society it is said to show the heat cast by a candle-flame on a half-penny piece 1,168 feet distant. This gives the present limit to our process of determining tempera- ture, and there is no reason for saying that this limit may not at some time be transcended. The sense of hearing seems to reach its limits rather quickly. As, accord i no; to the theory of sound, heariu": is but the result of the beating of sound-waves upon apparatus placed within the ear, it does not lie far to infer that the bounds of hearing will be determined by the sensibility to the greater or less rapidity of the strokes. It is found that sounds with less than sixteen beats to the second and those with more than thirty-five thousand do not impress themselves upon the average ear. A wide scope, but still a decided limit, and we can let the fancy play at will among the "voiceless" sounds which must fill the world around us. When we consider the sense of sight we find assistance from magnifying instruments very essential. The limit of the unaided sight is soon reached. If a line an inch long be cut into ten equal parts we can easily see each separate one. If divided into one hundred such parts they merge into one another, and it requires a clear vision to separate them. This separation is easily accomplished by the microscope, however. Yet when each one of these divisions is further divided into one thousand, or the whole line into one hundred thousand, even the microscope and light itself fails us, for at this point the waves of the light- rays interfere witli one another and the divisions, though sfiarp- cut, seem blui-red. So that the very force of nature which affects the organ of sight itself sets a limit to its usefulness. 34 JOURNAL OF THE Just as the ear caD adapt Itself only to sounds having a lim- ited range of beats or wave-lengths, so the eye can receive impres- sions from those rays only which move within a limited range of velocity. Beyond the red rays of the solar spectrum are many, quite invisible to the eye because of the length of their waves and the slowness of their movement, yet readily detected by a thermometer or thermopile. And so beyond the blue are very many invisible rays, too rapid and short in their motion, which are revealed to us by means of sensitized paper and which can only be seen then in their photographs. There are rays of light, then, of which tiie eye takes no cognizance which have an impor- tant warming and life-giving part to play in nature. We are forced to recur to the thermometer and that valuable coadjutor in scientific research, the photographic apparatus, to detect and measure these for us. If we retain the old definition of lio-ht as the force of which we are sensible by means of the organs of sight, can we call those light-rays which do not affect the optic nerves, and if not light, what are they ? Astronomers tell us that imperfections of instruments, impuri- ties and peculiarities of the atmosphere, limit the usefulness and the power of telescopes. Apparently not much more is hoped from the expensive and laborious enlarging of the glass lenses. No wonderful revelation is looked forward to. The limit in tin's line seems nearly reached. In the spectroscope we have a wonderful and powerful instru- ment, and one from which much has been expected. One of the greatest workers with the spectroscope. Dr. Crookes, whose pains- taking patience seems almost marvellous, tells us that its vision extends almost to infinitesimal particles. Of sodium, for instance, we can detect the one fourteen hundred-thousandth part of a milligramme. One would hardly suspect that the sense of smell was more delicate than that of sij^ht, vet the researches of Fischer and Penzoldt have shown that the nose is capable of detecting some substances with a delicacy two hundred and fifty times greater than the spectroscope. That is, without any external assistance, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 35 it is more far-reaching into the realm of Nature's little things than the most powerful instrument devised to aid the eye. How infinitesimally small must be the particles which for years arise IVom the few grains in a box of musk, and yet the sense of smell can unerringly detect them. How tiny the particles of perfume rising fi'om some small flower and scenting the breezes for hours — that is, conferring fragrance upon many miles of air. Still how easily the delicate nostril detects the presence of the sweet fragrance. This would seem to open up a new field of work for the ana- lyst, offering him most delicate assistance, and indeed Dr. Crookes suggests as much, but unfortunately, though so easily affected by some substances, the great majority of them do not affect the organ of smell at all, or in very slight degree, no matter in what quantity they may be used. So far as the quan- tity of matter is concerned, it is usually the case that the smell becomes less and less apparent as the quantity is increased, after a certain limit is reached. If too much ottar of roses or hydro- gen sul})hide be used, the sense of fragrance or of its opposite is largely lost. Turning now to the sense of taste, the last of these senses to be investigated, I can find no reported experiments upon its delicacy. Apparently only a few approximate statements have been made with regard to one or two substances. I have with some care experimented upon this point with a few characteristic substances, utilizing the sense of taste of two persons so as to partly eliminate personal errors. Known weights of the sub- stances, dissolved in the pro})er solvent, were diluted until the taste was barely perceptible, a slight further dilution causing its disappearance. The results show the sense of taste much less delicate than that of smell. Of sugar, y^^Q-g- of a gramme barely tastes; of salt, j-^^; of acid (hydrochloric), xordo"? *^^ saccha- ^'•'^ 1000000^ ^i"^l ^f strychnine j^-^5___^ ^f .^ gramme gave barely a perceptible taste, and this was the greatest delicacy of taste, or persistency of taste, reached with the substances experi- mented upon. Tf we compare the delicacy of taste towards 36 JOURNAL OF THE strychnine with the delicacy of the spectroscope towards sodium, we find the latter in the neighborhood of one hundred times stronger. These, then, are the bounds of our senses, so far as can at present be determined. That they were unlimited was not to be expected. Yet when we see these limits there is no room for a feeling of disappointment that man cannot grasp everything. The field for his powers is almost infinitely vast as it is, and the only cause for discouragement lies in the sharp limit put to the attainment of knowledge by the short space of his working time. THE ELEMENTS, HISTORICALLY CONSIDERED. F. P. VENABLE. According to the modern definition an element is the simplest form of matter. It cannot be further decomposed nor reduced. Other elements may be added to it and compounds formed, but nothing can be taken from it when in its elemental state. If it can be decomposed it ceases to be considered an element. Hence we can only state that such and such forms of matter are ele- ments, because at present no means of reducing them is known. This is an interpretation which has gradually grown up. In earlier times the idea was ratlier that of the genesis of matter. This last has been a puzzle which man has long striven to solve, and not merely a vexed question of these modern days, as we, in our arrogant assumption of vast intellectual superiority, are ^pt to think. Dr. Gladstone, in his address befi)re the British Association, at its meeting of 1883, says: "In the childhood of the human race the question was eagerly put, ^By what process were all things made?'" Shoo King, the most esteemed of Chinese classics, comprises the Great Plan with nine divisions. The first division relates to five elements — water, fire, wood, metal, earth. And this idea of the genesis of matter is attached ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC S0CIE:TY. 37 I to the word element down to a little more than a century ago, when in Macqiier's Dictionary of Chemi.stry — English Transla- tion, 1777 — we meet with the modern definition, worded as fol- lows : "Those bodies are called elements which are so simple that they cannot by any known method be decomposed or even altered, and which also enter, as principal or constituent parts, into the combination of other bodies, which are therefore called compound bodies/' But he adds: "The bodies in which this simplicity has been observed are fire, air, water and the purest earths/' In Table I, will be found the supposed primal elements at different periods, reaching as far back as history goes. It is but just to state that Dr. Crookes recognizes the insufficiency of data to support the theory of a primal element, and hardly does more than suggest "protyle" as an interesting possibility. In Table II a list is given of those at present acknowledged to be elements, with the date of discovery and name of discov- erer. ^yith regard to the dates of discovery, it is interesting to note that nine were known in the earliest historic times, four more were discovered before the eighteenth century, fifteen dur- ing the eighteenth century, and forty during the nineteenth cen- tury. The last thirty years of the eighteenth century form an espe- cial season of activity. Twelve out of the fifteen elements dis- covered during that century were discovered in those years. Taking the present century by decades we find that fourteen elements were discovered in the first, four in the second, seven in the third, five from fourth to sixth, inclusive, three in the seventh, five in the eighth, and two in the ninth. Davy with his discoveries made 1808 the most prolific year, but Wohler in 1828 runs him a close second. As to nationality, Germany can claim the first rank with eiirhteen discovered elements. Euii^land comes next with seven- teen, France lays claim to eleven, and the discovery of the remainder is due mainlv to the labors of Scandinavians. It is 38 JOURNAL OF THE strange that while other countries have elements named in their honor, England alone is without this distinction, notwithstand- ina: her sons have been so industrious and successful in their search. Table III gives a list of the supposed elements discovered since the modern era of chemistry. It is difficult to make such a list complete, as mistakes and errors in science, as elsewhere, are very numerous, and this is in large measure a list of mis- takes. It can only be said of the present list that it is as com- |)lete as the literature at command would admit of. Wherever possible the dates when the errors were found out are also given. The latter portion of the table cannot be called a list of errors. It represents new work, however, and that so recently completed that other workers have not as yet fully substantiated the results. When such confirmation is complete these "supposed elements" would have to be transferred to Table II. With regard to dates and names in both of these last tables (II and III) one meets with some confusion and contradictory statements. This is especially true in Table II. The best authorities and evidence attainable have been followed. TABLE I PRIMAL ELEMENTS. AUTHORITY. DATE. PRIMAL ELEMENTS. 1 "Shoo Kids:" Before 11 no B. C... Before lOOU B. C... COOB. C Water, fire, wood, metal, earth. Indian tradition Thales Subtle ether, air, light or fire, water, earth. Water. •Vnaxinnenes Air. ITeraclvtus Fire. Theracleidos Earth. \ristotle Fire, air, water, earth. I'ersiau?^ . Fire. Kfirvntians Water. freber 8tli century .Sulplmr and mercury. Sulphur, arsenic and water. Sulphur, mercury and salt. Sulphur, arsenic, salt. Water, air? Albertus Magnus... Basil Valentine Paracelsus Van Helmont 13th century 1.5th century 16th century 17th century.. 17th century 17th century 17th century 18th century 1777 1770-1780 Hoyle Becher Lemerv Defined elements as we do, but did not name them. VV'ater, terra lapidea, terra piuguis, terra fiuida. Water, spirit, oil, salt, earth. Hoerhaave Macquer Majority chemists... Pfout Says it is a question not to be answered by chem- istry. Fire, air, water, earth. Phlogiston, water, acid of sulphur, phosphorus. 1 181.5 metallic oxides, the earths, the alkalis. Hydrogen. Protvle. Crookes 1886 ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETV. :^9 TABLE II ELEMENTS. NAME. Aluminium... Antimony Arsenic Barium Boron Bismuth Bromine Cadmium Caesium Caicium Carbon Cerium Chlorine Chromium .... Cobalt Columbium... Copper Didymium .... Erbium Fluorine Gallium Germanium... Gluoinnm Gold Hydrogen Indium Iodine Iridium Iron Lanthanum .. Lead Lithium Magnesium.... Manganese ..., Mercury !\Iolvbdenum Nickel Nitrogen Osmium Oxygen Palladium Phosphorus .. Platinum Potassium Rhodium Rubidium Ruthenium..., Samarium Scandium Selenium Silicon Silver Sodium Strontium Sulpliur Tantalum Tellurium Thallium Thoiiuni Tin DISCOVEREE. Wohler Basil Valentine jBrandt I Davy JGay Lussac and Thenard. [Basil Valentine jBalard |strome3'er iBunsen and Kirchhott' JDavy DATE. Titanium .. Tungsten .. Uranium .. Vanadium . Yttcrl)iuni . Yttrium Zinc Zirconium. Klaproth Scheele Vauquelin Brandt Hatchett Prehistoric Mosander Mosander .Moissan IDe Boi.sbaudran Winkler Wohler Prehistoric Cavendish Reich and Richter Courtois , JTennant (Prehistoric Mosander Prehistoric Arfwed.son- Davy Gahn Very early Hjeim Cronstedt Rutherford Tennant [Priestley Wollaston iBrandt Watson r)avy Wollaston iKirchhoff and Bunsen Clans De Boisbaudran Nilson Berzelins Berzelius Prehistoric Daw Davy Prehistoric Ekeberg jKlaproth Crookes Berzelius Prehistoric Gretior D'Elhujar Klaproth Sefstrom .Mnrignae Wohler [Paracelsus I Berzelius 1828. 1490-1500. 1733. 1808. 1808. 15th century. 182G. 1818. 1860. 1808. 1803. 1774. 1797. 1735. 1801. 1841. 1843. 1886. 1875. 1886. 1828. 1781. 1875. 11812. 1804. 1839. 1817. 1808. 1774. 1782. 1751. 1772, 1804. 1774. 1803. 1009. 1750. 1807. 1804. 18G0. 1846. 1878. 1879. 1817. 1823. 1807. 1808. 1802. 1798. 1861. 1828. 1789. 1783. 1789. 1831. 1878. 1828. 16th century. 1824. 40 JOURNAL OF THE TABLE III — SUPPOSED ELEMENTS. NAME OF ELEMENT. DISCOVEREK. DATE. WHERE FOUND. PROVED TO BE DATE Hvdrosiderum Meyer 1780... 1781... 1777... llSi... 17Sf)... 1790... 1800... 1800... Cold short iron.... Cold short iron.... Diamond Lead ore Iron phosphide... Iron phosphide... Siderum Bergman Terra Nobilis Monnct Klaproth Satnrnit Peculiar Eartli Diamond spar Sand Beryl Sioa, AI2O3, Fe203 Sioj, .M2O3, FeaOa Calc'ni phos'ate i Sj'dneia Agnsterde Wedgwood Fi'ommsdortt Andronsia Winter! Thelike Hahnemann 1800... 1801... Marble Alkali Pneum Borax Ervtlironium Del Rio 1803... 1805... 1818... 1818... 1820... 1820... 1829... Lead ore Xiokei ore Nickel oi-e Cobal t ore. Lead vanadate.... Impure nickel.... Impure nickel.... Impure nickel.... Im're magn'sia... Nikoiannum Richter Vestimn or Sirimn, Wodanium Vest Lamoadius Croiloniiim Frommsdorff Sulphuric acid. .. Aurmn Milliimi Mills Osann He I'm an n Plnralium Platinum metals.. Ilmenium Niobium Donium Richardson I83fi... .Alumina Donarinm... Be rg m an Tliorium 1863 Noi-inm Svanberg H.Rose Uligreen Von Kobell Bahr Bischoff Kern Hermann Prat Lawrence Smith Garland Delafontaine Soret Dahll Guyard Cleve Lawrence Smith Scaechi Kaemmerer 1845... 1863 Peiopinm 184()... Niobium Aridium 1850... FeaOa, CrjOa, P2O5 Niobium 1854 Dianium 18(31)... Wasiiim 1863... A new earth 1863... Davyum 1877... 1877... 1877... 1877... 1878... 1878... 1878... 1878... 1879.. 1879... 1879... 1879... 1879... 1879... 1879... 1880... Platinum ores .... Columbite Pr'bly mixt're.... Neptunium Lavoesium Pvrite Mosandrum Samarskite . New eartlis Unnamed min'r'l Samarskite Philiippium Deeipiuni Samai'skite Gadolinite Gersdorflfite Platinum X Mixture 1887 Norvvegium Uralium Thulium Gadolinite Mixture Mixture 1887 Holmiurn Gadolinite 1887 Columhium Samarskite . Rogerium Samarskite Vesbium Lava Venad'm oxide... Comesium Ya Marisnac 1880... 1880... 1881... 1882... 18S3... 1884... 1885... 1885... 1885... 1885... 1886... 1886... 1886... 18!<6... 1880... 1886... 1886... 1886... 1886... 1886... 1886... 1886... 1886... Gadolinite Gadolinite Zinc ores Yb Phipson Cleve Wilm Websky Welsbach Boisbaudran Actinium Die Gadolinite Nameless Platinum ores Iduninm Lead Vanadate ... Didymium Didymium Didymium Xeodvmium Mixture .Mixture 1887 Praseodymium Za 1887 Zb a Linneman Boisbaudran Didymium Zc Terbia Didymium Austrium Dvspiosium Mixture? Mixture 1886 1887 Da f 'rook PS . Sb " Samarskite . . Sc Samarsjnte (^A Gadolinite (rp '1 (C a Pringle Gadolinite Gc Gadolinite Gn Gadolinite Gadolinite Ge Gp Gadolinite Gg Gadolinite Polvmnestum Ferruginous Q'tz Ferruginous Q'tz Ferruginous Q'tz Ferruginous Q'tz Fn named En^)odium " 11880... " 11886... " iissn... Gadenium ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 41 TABLE III PRIMAL ELEMENTS (CONTINUED). NAME OF ELEMENT. DTSCOVEREB. (( « « Kruss & Nilson. Hesperisium [Pringle Unnamed ' " Xa DeBoisbaudran &Cleve Xb Xc Xo Xe Xp Xg Er, Eib TnriA TlTlB Dh DlB Dir Dio OlE Dip I>iG r^iH Di, SrriA HrriB New earths Demareav DATE. tc <( (( • tc (C (C 1886.. 188G.. 1887 . 1887.. 1887.. 1887.. 1887., 1887.. 1887., 1887., 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887. 1887.. WHERE FOUND. PROVED TO BE iDATE. Ferruginous Q'tz', Ferruginous Q'tz Soret's X Soret's X Soret's X Soret's X Soret's X Soret's X Soret's X Erbium Erbium Thulium Thulium ' Didymium ' Didymiiim Didymium ..Didymium .jDidymium . I Didymium .Didymium ., Didymium .Didymium | .Didymium i .JDidymium .ICerite Note.— Mr. J. C. Roberts rendered valuable assistance in preparing Table III. Contributions from the N. C. Agricultural Experiment Station. No. XVI. EFFECT OF DECOMPOSING ORGANIC MATTER ON INSOLUBLE PHOSPHATE OF LIME. F. B. DANCY Some time ag;() I instituted a few rough ex])erinients with a view to a.scertainino; if the process of cleconi])o.sition »f organic matter, or the products of such decomposition, had any eifect on tri-calcic phosphate of lime in the way of converting it, or any part of it, into its soluble form. The first results were of such a character that the exj)eriments were not carried on to the extent originally contemplated, hut I thought it migiit be well to call attention to them as far a.> thev went. 6 42 JOURNAL OF THE For my samples I selected, first, a good specimen of ground bone, containing 40.01 per cent, phosphate of lime and 54.02 per cent, volatile-and-organic matter, and ground fine enough to pass a 60-mesh sieve. Next, I chose an especially pulverulent sample of South Carolina phosphate "floats," and then selected some good fish-scrap, ground to pass a 40-mesh sieve, and some excellent specimens of cotton seed meal, dried blood, and "am- monite," all ground to pass a 60-mesh sieve. In all these sam- ples I determined the per cent, of phosphate of lime and of volatile-and-organic matter. I then made four mixtures, con- sisting of fish-scrap and floats, cotton seed meal and floats, dried blood and floats and ammonite and floats, in such proportions by calculation that the content of volatile-and-organic matter in each should be the same as in the ground bone, namely, 54.02 per cent. I then took 25 grammes of the ground bone and 25 grammes of each of the four mixtures, rubbed them up well with water in mortars, and transferred them to filters in funnels, let the water extract filter through, and then washed the contents of the filters with successive portions of water until my filtrates amounted to, I think, about a liter each. I then stopped the ends of the funnels with little stoppers and left the moist con- tents to rot at the ordinary temperature of the laboratory, w ith free access of air. During the process of the decomposition I kept the masses moist by additions of water from time to time, and, by stirring them, kept fresh portions turned up and exposed to the air. I found the per cents, of soluble phosphoric acid in my fine samples, just after mixing and before rotting (obtained in the filtrates just alluded to), to be: TABLE I — BEFORE ROTTING. 1. Bone meal 0.1149 per cent. Soluble P2O5. 2. Fish and floats 0.1292 3. Meal and floats 0.0486 " 4. Blood and floats 0.0289 *' 5. Ammonite and floats 0.1537 ELIBHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 43 In seventeen days the n)ass of moist bone meal was thor- on«;lilv rotted, and a week later the other mixtures showed that they, too, were well decomposed throughout. The putrid smell from each of the five was highly offensive — alipost unbearable. I now leached out the soluble again with the same amount of water as at fir.>t. The filtration was exceedingly slow, requiring about six davs, so slowlv did the successive additions of water percolate through the putrid masses. In my filtrates I determined the soluble phosphoric acid as before, and found it to be as follows: 'J'ABLE II AFTER ROTTING. 1. Bone meal 0.0G.34 per cent. Soluble PaOs. 2. Fish and floats 0.0894 " " 3. Meal and floats 0.1561 " " " 4. Blood and floats 0.(J969 " 5. Ammonite and floats 0.1052 " " " The filtrates, reeking as they were with organic matter, pos- sessed a more or less opacity, and I w^as led to suspect that in the cases of 2, 3, 4 and 5 there might be some of the finer por- tions of the floats passed the filter. So I evaporated these four filtrates down, which cau.sed a separation and collection of the suspended matter, and filtered each into two parts, determining the phosphoric acid in each of the filtrates and residues thus obtained. The figures given in Table II are the sum of these two determinations in each case. In every case but 3 (that of the cotton seed meal) the phosphoric acid in the residue was in excess of that in the filtrate, tending to show that most of the phos})horic acid leached out from the rotted samples was mechanically carried through the filter rather than pas.sed in genuine solution. The cotton seed meal seems to have had most effect. But, granting that the whole of it was carried through in genuine solution, the per cent, is so sn)all as to show that little reliance can be placed on the decomposition of the organic matter with which our in.soluble phosphates are in contact as to rendering these pho>])hates soluble. 44 JOURNAL (3F THE What assistance the soil may give should the decomposition take place there, or what aid the })Iant juices may lend to the end desired, must be determined by more elaborate experimenta- tion. Had the per cent, of soluble phosphoric acid been considera- ble after the first rotting it was intended to carry on the rotting further and see the effect of prolonged decomposition, but as the effept brought about by thorough putridity was so insignificant it was concluded that further investigation would be a loss of time on these particular experiments. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory of the Univ. of N. C. No. VI. PRELIMINARY CATALOGUE OF THE BIRDS OF NORTH CAROLINA, WITH NOTES ON SOME OF THE SPECIES. GEORGE F. ATKINSON. PREFACE. Object of the catalogue. Previous to the work which was undertaken to prepare the present preliminary catalogue, very little systematic eifort had been made in the study of the birds to be found in the State of North Carolina. Of the earlier works mention should be made of Catesby's Natural History of the Carolinas;* but this work covered an extent of territory much larger than North Carolina, and included species which belong to an entirely distinct fauna. *The Natural History of Carolina, Florida, aud the Bahama Islands, by Mark Catesby. 1771. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 45 Beside the VVoodv Plants of North Carolina* and a cataloerne of the flowering plants and cryptogamsf of the State, the Rev. M. A. Curtis prepared for publication a "Description of the Quadrupeds'' and a ''Description of the Reptiles'' of Xorth Carolina. It is unfortunate that an appropriation was not made for the publication of these valuable reports; and still more so that the manuscript copies are probably lost, as frequent search has thus far failed to reveal their existence. In the letter! which recommends the publication of the above two reports Mr. Cur- tis says, "I have also in preparation, if desired, a 'Descrip- tion of the Birds of North Carolina.'" The extent of his work upon the birds of the State remains as yet unknown, whatever portions of it were completed being wrapped in the same obscurity which involves his work on the quadrupeds and rep- tiles. The object of the present catalogue is the enumeration of the birds which liavc been observed and absolutely identified within the State since about 1880, though most of the work has been done since 1884 and 1885; together w^ith notes on their occur- rence, distribution, and nesting. The work is recognized as incomplete in that it is a preliminary catalogue. The hope that the publication now of the records of the work, so far as it has progressed, may stimulate a desire in resident North Carolinians in different parts of the State to collect material and record observations of the birds to be found within our State limits; and the knowledge that the present catalogue would not only convey some useful information, but serve as a convenient pamphlet for reference and check list, induces me to present it in its present imperfect form. * Geological atnl Natural History Survey of North Carolina, Part III, Botany. The Woody Plants of the State, with descriptions of the Trees, Shrubs, and Woody Vines. ilbid. Part III, Botany. Containine: a catalogue of the Indigenous and Natu- ralized Plants of the State. 1867. :}: Through the kindness of Professor Holmes I had the privilege of consulting the letter from Rev. M. A. Curtis to His Excellency, Governor Worth, January 27, 1866. 46 JOURNAL OF THE Material. The collection of material at Chapel Hill was begun by myself in January, 1886; and, assisted by some of my students in the laboratory, has been continued to the present time, though no collections were made during the summer and fall of 1886. University duties interfere greatly with collection of material during the time for transient visitors, but such time as has been practicable has been zealously devoted to the collec- tion and preservation of material for study and future reference. In all about 120 species have been observed and absolutely identified by myself at Chapel Hill; \Vl species have been pre- served. In December, 1887, I visited Beaufort and New Bern, examined the collections of Mrs. Geoffroy and Mr. A. Finer, at Beaufort, and that of Clark and Morgan at New Bern ; and also made some collections and observations in the vicinity of Beau- fort, in all absolutely identifying about 50 species in addition to those taken at Chapel Hill. I am greatly indebted to H. H. & C. S. Brimley,* taxider- mists of Raleigh, for records of species collected and observed by them during a period extending over the last four or five 3'ears, in the vicinity of Raleigh, Currituck Sound, New Bern and Beaufort. One hundred and seventy-five species were noted in the vicinity of Raleigh, many of these being duplicated and some additions made from the coast region. I have also had for reference "A List of Birds of Buncombe County, N. C.,'' by John S. Cairns,t Weaversville, N. C. This list enumerates 169 species observed in Buncombe county. Mr. Charles F. Batchelder, of Cambridge, Mass., kindly sent me a copy of a pamphlet^ describing his observations upon the winter birds of the mountain region in 1886. In this he enu- merates 40 species. * Any parties desiring good skins for mounting:, or wishing any work from a taxidermist, will do well to write to Mr. Briraley. I have seen specimens of his workmanship. The work is in every way satisfactory. t Ornithologist and Oologist, Vol. XII, No. 1, 1887. JThe North Carolina Mountains in Winter, by Charles F. Batcheldor. The Auk, Vol. III. 1886, pp. 307-314. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 47 Mr. William Brewster, of Cambridge, Mass., curator of birds aud mammals in the Museum of Comparativ^e Zoology, loaned me a copy of a pamphlet* describing a two weeks tour in the mountain region, from which I have gleaned the most important informa- tion concerning the occurrence of the summer visitors of that region. This pamphlet enumerates 102 species. The private collection of James Busbee, of Raleigh, contains 87 North Carolina species, most of which were collected in the vicinity of Raleigh. This list furnishes some very rare occur- rences. I take this opportunity of recognizing the aid given, in deter- mining the nesting of our birds, by Drs. Kemp P. and Herbert B. Battle, of Raleigh, from a collection of eggs made by them. The 3ggs were recently determined by the curator of oology at the Smithsonian institution. The list contains 57 North Caro- lina species. Where credit is due any of the above named gentlemen for observations on any but our very common birds, I have given it under each species. Rich variety of bird life. A glance at the map of the East- ern United States will show that North Carolina is peculiarly situated, not only with reference to its central position from north to south, and its great extent east and west, but also in the variety of its physical features. It is situated between the par- allels of latitude 33|° and 36|° north, and longitude 75J° and 84 J° west from Greenwich ; approximately 580 miles long from Cape Hatteras to the western limits of Cherokee county, and 200 miles wide in the vicinity of Ca})e Fear, with 300 miles of sea-coast in the east and 200 miles of mountain rano;e in the west. The coast region, with Currituck, Albemarle, and Pam- lico, and the lesser sounds, with the attendant estuaries, numer- ous rivers, and extensive salt and fresh water marshes, invites vast numbers of Diving Birds, Long-winged-, Toti])almate-, and Lamellirostral-Swimmers, Shore Birds, Herons, Ibises, Rails, * An Ornithological Reconnaissance in Western North Carolina, b}' William Brewster. The Auk, Vol. Ill, No, 1, January, 18«6. 48 JOURNAL OF THE etc., and becomes, from its extent in central position, the recip- ient of many extra-limital species from the fauna to the north and south. Perha[)s no phice east of the Rockies is more inter- esting in proportion to its area than is the mountain region of Western Nortli Carolina. It possesses the liighest peak east of the Rocky Mountains. Starting in the valleys at the foot of some of the highest peaks, in the ascent of th(i mountain side we can pass through successively four different faunae, the Lou- isianian, Carolinian, Alleghanian, and Canadian,* having rep- resented as it were upon one mountain side characteristic species from an extent of territory reach i no: from the Gulf States to British America. In the middle region nature has also pro- vided for the retention of numbers and variety of the feathered kind, notwithstanding the encroachment of human civilization upon their primeval haunts. The "rolling" character of the surface with its attendant tree- and bush-begirt streams and val- leys; the worn-out hillsides grown up to "old field pine"; and the steep rocky places incapable of cultivation, offer a peaceful harbor to such as are not yet emboldened to live near the habi- tation of man. The varied climate in different sections also testifies to the natural adaptation of the State to the reception of widely differ- ent fauna?, or the same fauna at different parts of the State at different seasons of the year. The following table will illustrate the average temperature of the different regions for the four sea- sons of the year. The figures are taken from a table made by the North Carolina Geological Survey, covering observations made during eight to fifteen years in various parts of the State. I select only those figures which represent the temperature of the regions I have chosen for use in the present pamphlet. Mountain region. Middle region Coast region SPRING. 52° 57° 59° SUMMER. 70° 76° 77° AUTUMN. 50° 58° 63° WINTER. 36° 40° 45° *See Auk, Vol. Ill, No. 1. January, 1886. Brewster. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 49 These represent the average taken from a number of places in each region. In the mountain region it gives no adequate idea of the temperature upon the upper slopes of the highest mountains, where we have represented the Canadian fauna. A table for Smithville, in the extreme south-eastern part of the State, will illustrate how much warmer is such a southern point on the coast. SPRING. SUMMER. AUTUMN. WINTER. Smithville f)3° 79° 66° 49° In the mountain region, for example, we find on the higher mountains as summer sojourners Wilson's Thrushes, Yellow- throated Vireos, Rose-bi'easted Grosbeaks, Winter Wrens, Gol- den-crested Kinglets, etc., which in the middle region are only winter visitors, or only transients going to Middle America, Northern South America, or the West Indies for the winter; while some, the Towhee Bunting {Pipilo erythrophthalmus), for example, are summer sojourners in the mountain region, tran- sients in the middle, and winter visitors in the coast region, and the extent of the State from north to south scarcely exceeds 2^ degrees latitude! We cannot, of course, say that the same indi- viduals spend the entire year in the State, but it would not be singular if quite a number of the summer visitors to the mount- ain region pass eastward with the approach of winter and reside for the time in the coast region. While at Beaufort in the latter part of December, 1887, Cat- birds (Galeoscoptes cavolinensis), Brown Thrashers {Harporhyn- chus rufus), Towhee Buntings (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), were in abundance, and evidently settled down for the winter. I was told that they were common during the winter. Take such a point as Smithville, and we might expect to find ((uite a number of winter visitors that are only known as ti'an- sients in the middle, and summer sojourners in the mountain region. 50 JOURNAL OF THE Rare species , and non- occur rence of species once abundant. As rare species we may reasonably expect to take, at least in the south-east part of the State, nearly all the species commonly accredited to South Carolina. The taking of Helinaia swain- sonii by Brimley is an evidence of this. The nesting of Peuccea cestivalis hackmani at Cliapel Hill also shows how well adapted North Carolina is for species accredited usually to the States farther south. A glance at the map will show that Smithville is only one degree of latitude north of Charleston, while it is more than one degree south of the northern border of South Carolina. The disappearance of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker and the Carolina Paroquet from North Carolina and the other States constituting the northern portions of their habitat, and their restriction to the Gulf States, furnish examples of the change of distribution of some species, as affected by changes in their environment. It would not be surprising if at some time in the not far future they should become extinct species. They are placed in the present catalogue because of their former abund- ance in the State, and the possibility that their restriction to more southern districts may prevent their ever being taken in the State again. They should be looked for in the south-eastern part of the State. Preserve a rich avian fauna. The value of birds as scaven- gers, in destroying injurious insects, and their value in affording objects for the cultivation of our perception of the beautiful, is well recognized. Birds are subject to the same laws in the struggle for existence that other animals are, and man should take care that unnecessary encroachments u[)on their existence be avoided. The reckless and indiscriminate collection and rob- bing: of birds' nests, which annually cuts off thousands of the possible increase of beautiful and useful birds, should be stopped. The merciless and wholesale slaughter, which some- times takes place during the migration of birds to their summer abodes, should cease. Laws to this effect would be of little avail without the support of an interested pul)lic sentiment. Let a ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 51 few men in various parts of the State devote their spare time to the study of the birds of their section, recording the result of their observation ; let a general knowledge of the habits and use- fultiess of birds become a part of the instruction in the common schools, and ere long the birds will be in such popular favor that thev will be encourag-ed to come and stav, instead of beino; gradually driven to remote regions and to possible extinction. Explanation of terms in the catalogue. In arranging the cata- logue I have followed the "Canons of Nomenclature" adopted bv the American Ornit hoi ovists Union. The catalogue enumerates 255 species and subspecies. An Appendix is added, consisting of 81 species and sub- species, which we may reasonably expect to take, with careful work, within the limits of the State. This would make in all 336 species and subspecies, and there is a hopeful possibility of the number being still farther increased by the appearance of casual and accidental visitors. The numbers in parenthesis correspond with those of the A. O. U. Check List of North American Birds. The vernacular name adopted by the A. O. U. is placed immediately following the scientific name, and in some cases synonymic vernacular names are added in quotation. (Coll. of 1877) refers to specimens which were collected at Chapel Hill, during the spring of 1877, by several students at the University. (Univ. Coll.) refers to the specimen deposited in the Univer- sity museum. Any one wishing to donate specimens to the University may be assured that they will be well cared for, and properly labelled. The numbers marked * are species known to breed in the State. Many others breed, but we have as yet no positive evi- dence of the fact. 52 JOURNAL OF THE CATALOGUE Order PYGOPODES. Diving Birds. Family PODICIPID.E. Grebes. Genus CoLYMBUS Linnaeus. Subgenus Colymbus. 1. (2). a holbwim (Reinh.). Holboell's Grebe. Chapel Hill. (Coll. 1877). J. I. Dunlap. Subgenus Dytes Kaup. 2. (3). C. auritus Linn. Horned Grebe. Currituck Sound, February, 1884; rather common (Brimley). Genus PoDiLYMBUS Lesson. 3. (6). P. podiceps (Linn.). Pied-billed Grebe. Middle and coast regions, common in the latter place. (Univ. Coll.). Family URINATORID^. Loons. Genus Urinator Cuvier. 4. (7). U. imber (Gunn.). Loon. Winter visitor, rather rare. (Univ. Coll.). 5.(11). U. lumme (Gunu.). Red- throated Loon. Coast, win- ter visitor. Order LONGIPENNES. Long-winged Swimmers. Family LARID^. Gulls and Terns. Genus Larus Linnteus. 6. (51a). L. argentatus smithsonianus Coues. American Her- ring Gull. Coast, common in winter. 7. (54). L. delaivaren^iis Ord. Ring-billed Gull. Coast, rather rare. *8. (58). L. atridlla (Linn.). Laughing Gull. Coast, com- mon, breeds. The young are so different in color from the K'^ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. bo adults that fishermen generally insist that tliey are a diiferent species. They call them '^Fool Gull." Mr. Finer tells me the name is given them because they can be so easily approached and shot, due as he rightly judges to the fact that they are young. 9. (60). L. j)kUadelphia (Ord.). Bonaparte's Gull. Middle and coast regions, not very common. Genus Sterna Linnaeus. Subgenus Thalasseus Boie. 10. {'o^^)' S. maxima Bodd. Koyal Tern. Coast, rather common. Subgenus Sterna. 11. (69). 8. farderi Nutt. Forster's Tern. Coast, common. 12. (70). 8. hirundo Linn. Common Tern. Coast, com- mon. Subgenus Sternula Boie. *13. (74). 8. antillarum (Less.). Least Tern. Coast, com- mon, breeds. Subgenus Haliplana Wagler. 14. (75). 8. fuliginosa Gmel. Sooty Tern. Coast, common. Genus Hydrochelidon Boie. 15. (77). H. nigra surinamensis (Gmel.). Black Tern. Coast, common. Family RYNCHOPID.E. Skimmers. Genus Rynchops Linnaeus. 16. (80). R. nigra Linn. Black Skimmer. Coast, com- mon. Order TUBINARES. Tube-nosed Swimmers. Family PROCELLARID.^:. Fulmars and Shearwaters. Genus Puffinus Brisson. 17. (88). P. borealis Cory? Cory's Shearwater. I saw at Beaufoi't a wing of one of the Sliearwaters taken at that place. From the length of the wing, and from a description of the bird given to me, I judge it to be this species. 04 JOURNAL OF THE Order STEGANOPODES. Totipalmate Swimmers. Family PHALACROCORACID^E. Coimorants. Genus Phalacrocorax Brisson. Subgenus Phalacrocorax. 18. (120). P. dllophus (Sw. & Rich.). Duuble-crestecl Cor- morant. Family PELECANID^. Pelicans. Genus Pb:lecanus Linnaeus. Subgenus Cyrtopelicaxus Reichenbach. 19. (125). P. erythrorhynchos Gmel. American White Pelican. One taken by Brimley on State Carp Ponds, Raleigh, May 12, 1884. Order ANSERES. Lamellirostral Swimmers. Family ANATID^E. Ducks, Geese, and Swans. Genus Merganser Brisson. 20. (129). 31. americanus (Cass.). American Merganser. Coast, rather rare. (Coll of 1877). 21. (130). 31. serrator (Linn.). Red-breasted Merganser. Coast, rare. Genus LoPHODYTES Reichenbach. 22. (131). L. ciicullatus (Linn.). Hooded Merganser. Coast, common; aiiddle region, rare. Genus Anas Linnaeus. Subgenus Anas. 23. (132). A. boscha.s Linn. Mallard. Winter visitor, common. 24. (133). ^1. oh^cura Gmel. Black Duck. Winter vis- itor, rare in middle region, common on coast. Subgenus Chaulp:easmus Bonaparte. 25. (135). A. strepera Linn. Gadwall. Coast, common; middle region, rare. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 00 Subgenus Mareca Stephens. 26. (137). .4. americana Gmel. Baklpate. Coast, common. Subgenus Nettion Kaup. 27. (139). A. carolinensis Gmel. Green-winged Teal. Transient visitor, sometimes common on coast, rare in middle region. Subgenus Querquedula Stephens. 28. (140). A. discors Linn. Blue-winged Teal. Transient visitor, rather rare. Genus Spatula Boie. 29. (142). *S'. dypeata (Linn.). Shoveller. Coast, rare. '' Spoonbill." Genus Dafila Stephens. 30. (143). TJ. acuta (Linn.). Pintail. Transient visitor, coast, rare. Called also "Sprigtail.*^ Genus Aix Boie. *31. (144). ^4. sponsa (Linn.). \yood Duck. Resident; entire State; recorded by Batchelder in mountain region during winter. Brewster says it breeds numerously along the mountain streams. Genus Aythya Boie. Subgenus Aythya. 32.(146). ^4. americana (Eyt.). Redhead. Winter visitor; middle and coast region, rather rare. 33. (147). A. vallisneria (Wils.). Canvas-back. Rare. Subgenus Fuligula Stephens. 34. (148). A. marila nearctia Stejn. American Scaup Duck. Winter visitor, rare in middle region; common (^n coast. 35. (149). A. affinis (Eyt.). Le.sser Scaup Duck. Winter visitor, verv common on coast. Called also "Black-head.'' 36. (150). ^4. collaris (Donov.). Ring-necked Duck. Win- ter visitor, coast, rather rare. Genus Glaucionetta Stejneger. 37. (151). G. clangula americana (Bonap.). American Gol- den-eye. Coast, winter vis-itor, rather rare. 56 JOURNAL OF THE Genus Charitonnetta Stejneger. 38. (153). C albeola (Linn.). Bnffle-head. WintcM' visitor, middle region, rare; coast, common. Genus Clang ula Leach. 39.(154). C.hyemalis (Lmn.). Old-squaw. Winter visitor, coast, rare. Genus Oidemia Fleming:. Subgenus Melanitta Boie. 40. (165). O. deglandi Bonap. White-winged Scoter. Casual winter visitor. One taken at Beaufort. Subgenus Pelionetta Kaup. 41. (166). 0. persjjlcillata (Linn.). Surf Scoter. Winter visitor, coast, rare. One taken at Beaufort. Genus EriSxMATURA Bona})arte. 42. (167). JE. rubida (Wils.). Ruddy Duck. Probably a resi- dent. Common in winter. Called also ''Paddy," ''Light- wood Knot,'' " Butter-ball." Names applied also to several related species. Genus Chen Boie. 43. ( ). C. ccendeseens (Linn.). Blue Goose. Determined from a live specimen in possession of S. J. Moore, Beaufort. Has been in captivity for three years; taken on Bogue Beach, one mile from Fort Macou, by James W^illis, of Morehead City in spring of 1884; rare. 44. (169a). C. hyperborea nivalis (Forst.). Greater Snow (xoose. Winter visitor, rare. Genus Anser Brisson. 45. (171a). A. (dbifrons gambeli (Hartl.). American White- fronted Goose. Buncombe county (vide Cairns). Genus Branta Scopoli. 46. (172). B. canadensis (Linn.). Canada Goose. Winter visitor, rather common. 47. (173). B. beniida (Linn.). Brant. Winter visitor, rather common in Beaufort market, December, 1887. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 57 Genus Olor Wagler. 48. (180). 0. columhianus (Ord.). Whistling Swan. Cnrri- tnck Sound, February, 1884, common (Brimley). ( )r(ler HERODIONES. Herons, Storks, Ibises, Etc. Family CICONIID.E. Storks and Wood Ibises. Genus Tantalus Linnaeus. 49. (188). T. locidator Linn. Wood Ibis. One killed at Garners, fiv^e miles south of Raleigh, July, 1884 (Brimley). Family ARDEID.E. Herons, Bitterns, Etc. Genus BOTAURUS Hermann. Subgenus Botaurus. 50. (190). B. lentiginosus (Montag.). American Bittern. Rather rare. Has various popular names, ^' Stake Driver," "Thunder Pump," etc. Subgenus Ardetta Gray. 51.(191). B. exUis{Q(mQ\.). Least Bittern. Rare; occasion- ally taken in marshes of the coast region. Genus Ardea Linnieus. Subgenus Ardea. 52. (194). A IierocUas Linn. Great Blue Heron. Summer sojourner, rather common. Subgenus Herodias Boie. 53. (196). A. egretta Gmel. American Egret. Rather rare. Sometimes called "White Crane.'^ Subgenus Garzetta Kaup. 54. (197). A. candidhshna Gmel. Snowy Heron. Coast, rare. One from A\'ilmington in collection of James Busbee, Raleigh. One in collection of A. Finer, Morehead City. Subgenus Florida Baird. 55. (200). A. cosndea Linn. Little Blue Heron. Rare. 8 58 JOURNAL OF THE Subgeuus BuTORiDES Blvth. *56. (201). A. virescens Linn. Green Heron. Generally distributed, common. Commonly called ''Schytepoke/' "Fly- up-the-creek," etc. Genus Nycticorax Stephens. Suboenus Nyctherodius Reichenbach. 57. (203). N. violaceus (Linn.). Yellow-crowned Night Heron. One taken at Beaufort, May, 1887; mounted by firm of Clark & Morgan, New Bern. Order PALUDICOL^. Cranes, Rails, Etc. Family RALLID^E. Rails, Gallinules, and Coots. Genus Rallus Linn?eus. *58. (208). B. elegans Aud. King Rail. Summer so- journer, rare. 59. (211). i?. longirostris crepitans (Gmel.). Clapper Rail. Coast region, abundant (Brimley). 60. (212). R. virginianus Linn. Virginia Rail. Coll. Clark and Morgan. Genus PoRZANA Vieillot. Subgenus Porzana. 61. (214). P. Carolina (Linn.). Sora. Transient visitor, rare. (Univ. Coll.). ''Carolina Rail,'' "Ortolan," etc. Subgenus Coturnicops Bonaparte. 62. (215). P. noveboracensis (Gmel.). Yellow Rail. Rare. One captured alive near Raleigh, September, 1882 (Brimley). Genus loNORNis Reichenbach. 63. (218). /. martinica (Linn.). Purple Gallinule. Rare. One taken June 6th, 1887, by Brimley, near Raleigh. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 59 Genus Gallinula Brisson. 64. (219). G. galeata (Licht.). Florida Gallinule. Rare. One specimen taken by Brimley in New Bern, 1885. One taken near Asheville by Brewster in early summer of 1885.t Genus FuLiCA Lin mens. 65. (221). F. amerlcana Gmel. American Coot. Common in coast region; rare in middle region. One walked into Mr. McCauley's store at Chapel Hill on the night of April S, 1887, at 8 o'clock, and was captured. A heavy wind and rain storm was prevailing, and had continued all day. (Univ. Coll.). Order LIMICOL.E. Shore Birds. Family SCOLOPCID.F:. Snipes, Sandpipers, Etc. Genus Philohela Gray. "^66. (228). P. minor (Gmel.). American Woodcock. Gen- erallv distributed, rather rare. Genus Gallinago Leach. 67.(230). G. delicata(On].). Wilson's Snipe. Rather com- mon, transient throughout the State. Genus Mackorhampus Leach. 68. (231). 31. griseus (Gmel.). Dowitcher. Common in coast region, rare in middle region. One killed July, 1884, on State Carp Ponds, near Raleigh, by Brimley. 69. (232). M. SGohpaceus (Say). Long-billed Dowitcher. Identified from one specimen seen at Beaufort. Genus Tringa Linnaeus. Subgenus Actodromas Kaup. 70. (239). T. maculata Vieill. Pectoral Sandpiper. Rare. One taken by Brimley at Raleigh, April 2, 1886. 71. (242). T. minutilla Yieill. Legist Sandpiper. Tran- sient visitor, common in coast, rather rare in middle, and very rare in mountain region. (Brindey and Cairns). tSee "Auk," Vol. Ill, No. I, January, 1886. 60 JOURNAL OF THE Subgenus Pelidna Cuvier. 72. (243a). T. alpina pacifica (Coues). Red-backed Sand- piper. Identified from two specimens seen at Beaufort. Genus Calidris Cuvier. 73. (248). C arenaria (Linn.). Sanderling. Common in winter in coast region. Genus Totaxus Bechstein. Subgenus Glottis Koch. 74. (253). T. melanoleucus (Gmel.). Greater Yellow-legs. Raleigh, reported by Brimley for April, 1887. 75. (255). T. flavipes (Gmel.). Yellow-legs. Middle and coast regions, transient visitor, rather rare. Subgenus Rhyacophilus Kaup. 76. (256). T. solitarim (Wils.). Solitary Sandpiper. Tran- sient visitor, middle and mountain regions, rather common. I have seen this bird, when frightened by being wounded, swim under water, using its wings as oars. Genns Symphemia Rafinesque. *77. (258). S. semipalmata (Gmel.). Willit. Beaufort, com- mon (Brimley). Genus Bartramia Lesson. 78. (261). B. longicauda Bechst. Bartramian Sandpiper. Raleigh, April, 1887 (Brimley). Genus AcTiTis Illiger. 79. (263). A. macidarla (Linn.). Spotted Sandpiper. Resi- dent in mountain region (Brewster and Cairns). Thus far deter- mined as transient visitor in middle region. Genus Numenius Brisson. 80. (264). N. longirostrls Wils. Long-billed Curlew. Beau- fort, common (Brimley). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 61 Family CHARADRIID^E. Plovers. Genus Charadrius Linnaeus. Subgenus Squatarola Cuvier. 81.(270). C. squatarola (hmu.). Black-bellied Plover. Iden- tified from one specimen at Beaufort. Subtrenus Charadrius Linnaeus. 82. (272). C. dominicus Mull. American Golden Plover. One taken at Raleigh in autumn, 1884. Rare, transient. Genus yl^GiALiTis Boie. Subscenus Oxyechus Reichenbach. *83. (273). A. vocifera (Linn.). Killdeer. Resident, gener- ally distributed, rather common. (Univ. Coll.). Subo-enus JEgialitis Boie. 84. (274). A. semipahnata Bonap. Semipalmated Plover. Rare transient, taken bv Brimley at Raleitrh in May, 1884. Family APHRIZID^. Surf Birds and Turnstones. Genus Arenaria Brisson. 85. (283). A. interpres (Linn.). Turnstone. Beaufort, rather common (Brimley). Order GALLINtE. Gallinaceous Birds. Family TETRAONID-.E. Grouse, Partridges, Etc. Genus CoLiNUS Lesson. *86. (289). (7. mV^^rm? amis (Linn.). Bob-White. Very com- mon throughout the State. Called '^Partridge'' at the South, ''Quail" at the Xorth. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Boxasa Stephens. *87. (300). B. umheUus (Linn.). Ruffed Grouse. Mountain region. Xot very common. At breeding season above altitude of 4,000 feet. Mountain people say it is as common in valleys as at hitrh elevations. Brewster thiid\S this mav be true in autumn and winter, but doubts it during breeding season. Occurs as far east as Old Fort {vide Brewster). 62 JOURNAL OF THE Family PHASIANID.E. Pheasants, Etc. Genus Meleagris Linn^ens. '^^%. (310). J/, gallapavo Linn. Wild Turkey. Resident, generally distributed. Rare in some localities, rather common in others. (Eggs in Univ. Coll.). Order COLUMBJE. Pigeons. Family COLUMBID^E. Pigeons. Genus EcTOPiSTES Swainsou. 89. (315). E. mlgratorius (Linn.). Passenger Pigeon. Rare transient (Brimley and Cairns). Genus Zenaidura Bonaparte. *90. (316). Z. macroura (Linn.). Mourning Dove. Gener- ally distributed, resident, rather common. (Univ. Coll.). Order RAPTORES. Birds of Prev. Family CATHARTID.E. American Vultures. Genus Cathartes IlhVer. *91. (325). C. aura (Linn.). Turkey Vulture. Resident, very common. Genus Catharista Vieillot. - *92. (326). G atixita (Bartr.). Black Vulture. Resident, common. Family FALCONID^E. Vultures, Falcons, Hawks, Eagles, Etc. Genus Elanoides Vieillot. 93.(327). E. forjicatus (Li\nn.). Swallow-tailed Kite. Casual in mountain region (vide Cairns). Genus Circus Lacepede. 94. (331). C. hitdsonius (Linn.). Marsh Hawk. Winter vis- itor, rather common. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIP^IC SOCIETY. 63 Genus Accipiter Brisson. Subgenus Accipiter. 95. (332). A. velox (Wils.). Sharp-.shinned Hawk. Rather common. (Univ. Coll.). Rare resident in mountain region {vide Cairns). 96. (333). A. Gooperi (Bonap.). Cooper's Hawk. Resident, rather common and generally distributed throughout the State. Sometimes called "Blue Darter," '^Chicken Hawk/' "Pigeon Hawk/' which latter two names are also applied to A. velox. Probably A. velox and cooperi both breed in the State. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Buteo Cuvier. Subgenus Buteo. 97. (337). B. borealis (Gmel.). Red-tailed Hawk. Rather common; probably resident throughout the State; reported as resident in mountain region {vide Cairns). (Priv. Coll.). "^98. (239). B. lineatiis (Gmel.). Red-shouldered Hawk. Resident, common throughout the State. 99. (342). B. swainsoni Bonap. Swainson's Hawk. Re- ported as accidental in mountain region [vide Cairns). 100. (343). B. latissimus (Wils.). Broad- winged Hawk. Re- ported from mountain region (vide Brewster). Also taken in vicinity of Raleigh (vide coll. of James Busbee). Genus Aquila Brisson. *101. (349). .4. c/i/'^sae^06' (Linn.). Golden Eagle. Mount- ain region, resident. Said to breed on inaccessible cliffs and ledges of the higher mountains {vide Brew\ster). Genus Halleetus Savigny. *102. (352). H. leucocephalus (Linn.). Bald Eagle. Resident, generally distributed, but rare. Said to breed in coast region ; the young, in this section, during change of pliuuage, called by many "Gray Eagle." 64 JOURNAL OF THE Genus Falco Liniiieus. Subgenus RHY^x•HODOX Nitzscli. *103. (356). F. peregrinus anatum (Bonaj).). Duck Hawk. Mountain region. Resident; mountaineers say they breed in same places many years in succession. They also believe they "go blind'' in August and consequently die of starvation (vide Brewster). Subgenus ^Esalon Kaup. 104. (357). F. columbarius Linn. Pigeon Hawk. One taken by Brimley near Raleigh, October 1, 1886. Subgenus Tinnunculus Yieillot. 105. (360). F. sparverius Linn. American Sparrow Hawk. Resident, probably breeds. Also called '^American Kestril." (Univ. Coll.). Genus Pandion Savitrnv. 106. (364). P. JiaUceetus earolinensis (Gmel.). American Osprey. Rare transient visitor for middle and coast region. Rare summer visitor in mountain region {vide Cairns). Family BUBONID^. Horned Owls, Etc. Genus Asio Brisson. 107. (366). A. tcilsonianus (Less.). American Long-eared Owl. One taken near Raleigh, in coll. of James Busbee. 108. (367). A. accipltrinus (Pall.). Short-eared Owl. Rare, taken both at Raleigh (Brimley and Busbee) and in Buncombe county (^vide Cairns). Genus Syrnium Savigny. *109. (368). S. nebulosum (Forst.). Barred Owl. Resident, generally distributed, rather common. Genus Megascops Kaup. *110. (373). 31. asio (Linn.). Screech Owl. Resident, gen- erally distributed, very common in middle, and coast, and rare in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 65 Genus Bubo Cuvier, 111. (375). B. virginianus (Gniel.). Great Horned Owl. Resident^ generally distributed, though not very common. Genus Nyctea Stephens, 112. (376). N. nyctea (Linn.). Snowy Owl. Rare straggler to mountain region {vide Cairns). Order PSITTAI. Parrots, Macaws, Paroquets. Etc. Family PSITTACID^. Genus CoNURUS Kuhl. 113. (382). C. carolinensis (Linn.). Carolina Paroquet. For- merly a resident of North Carolina, now confined to the Gulf States and Lower Mississippi Valley. Should be looked for as accidental in the south-eastern parts of the State. Order COCCYGES. Cuckoos, Etc. Family CUCULID.E. Cuckoos, Anis, Etc. Genus CoccYZUS Vieillot. *114. (387). C. americanus (Linn.). Yellow-billed Cuckoo. Summer visitor, generally distributed, common. (Univ. Coll.). 115. (388). C. erythrophthalmus (Wils.), Black-billed Cuckoo. Summer visitor, rare (Brindcy). Common transient and rare summer visitor in mountain region {vide Cairns). Family ALCEDIXID^E. Kingfishers. Genus Ceryle Boie. Subgenus Streptoceryle Bonaparte. IIG. (390). G alcyon (Linn.). Belted Kingfisher. Resi- dent, generally distributed, common; probably breeds. (Univ. Coll.). QQ JOURNAL OF THE Order PICI. Woodpeckers, Wrynecks, Etc. Family PICID.E. Woodpeckers. Genns Campephilus Gray. 117. (392). C. principalis (h'u\n.). Ivory-billed Woodpecker. Formerly a resident of North Carolina, now confined to the Gulf States and Lower Mississippi Valley. Should be looked for as accidental in the south-eastern parts of the State. Genus Dryobateh Boie. 118.(393). D. villosus (JJnn.). Hairy Woodpecker. Mount- ain region, rare resident. Single male shot among balsams of Black Mountains; referred by some to D. v. leucomelas {vide Brewster). Reported also by Batchelder in winter, and by Cairns as a " rare resident.'^ 119. (393b). D. viUosus audohonii (Swains.). Southern Hairy Woodpecker. Resident, generally distributed, rather rare. *120. (394). D. pubescens (Linn.). Downy Woodpecker. Resident, common. (Univ^ Coll.). 121. (395). D. horealis (Vieill.). Red-cockaded Woodpecker. Probably a resident of the coast region. I shot one December 14th, 1887, in marshy woodland about two miles from Beaufort. Standing in the road I could count at a dozen specimens within a few rods. They were searching very industriously on pine and oak trees for insects, and uttering a peculiar, sharp, ^^eh-r-r-r-r.'^ (Priv. Coll.). Genus Sphyrapicus Baird. 122. (402). S. varius (Linn.). Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. Common in fall, winter and spring; reported as resident in mountain region (mde Cairns). (Univ. Coll.). Genus Ceophlceus Cabanis. *123. (405). C. pileatm (Linn.). Pileated Woodpecker. Resident, generally distributed, rare. Eggs taken in Buncombe county April 20, 1886, by Cairns. The adult is a very shy bird. When young they are comparatively tame. In June^ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 67 1887, four nearly full-grown ones came into the grove on the University grounds. After pui'suing them for some time, and shooting one, they lighted in a large oak so near one of the buildings that I killed two at one shot from my open window. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Melanerpes Swainson. Subgenus Melanerpes. 124. (406), 31. erythrocepalus (Linn.). Red-headed Wood- pecker. Rare as resident, common in summer in localities; gen- erally distributed. (Univ\ Coll.). Subgenus Centurus Swainson. 125. (409). M. carolinus (Linn.). Red-bellied Woodpecker. Resident, generally distributed, rather rare, but common at times in localities. Very common at Chaj)el Hill in autumn and winter of '87 and '88. (Univ. Coll.). Genus C0LAPTE8 Swainson. *126. (412). C. auratus (Linn.). Flicker. Resident, gener- ally distributed, common. Abundant as transient in Buncombe county, but rare in summer and winter [ride Cairns). In sum- mer Brewster saw^ them in mountain region only on plateaus between 3,000 feet and 4,000 feet. Popularly known as ''Yel- lowhammer," ^'Golden-winged Woodpecker," etc. (Univ. Coll.). Order MACROCHIRES. Goatsuckers, Swifts, Etc. Family CAPRIMULGIDiE. Goatsuckers, Etc. Genus Antrostomus Gould. 127. (416). A. carolinensis (Gmel.). Chuck-will's- widow. Raleigh, summer visitor, rather common. *128. (417). A.vociferus {Wih.). Whip-poor-will. Summer visitor, generally distributed ; less common in mountain region. Genus Chordeiles Swainson. 129. (420). C. virginianus (Gmel.). Nighthawk. Summer visitor, more common as transient; generally distributed. Brews- 68 JOURNAL OF THE ter records only one specimen seen near Aslieville, though it was reported as of general occurrence. Buncombe county, common transient, and rather common summer visitor {vide Cairns). A specimen was brought me in August, 1887, while at Balsam Sta- tion, by a mountaineer. (Univ. Coll.). Family MICROPODID^E. Swifts. Genus ChtETURA Stephens. *130. (423). C. pelagica (Linn.). Chimney Swift. Gener- ally distributed, summer visitor, common. (Univ. Coll.). Family TROCHILIDiE. Humming Birds. Genus Trochilus Linnaeus. Subgenus Trochilus. *13L (428). T. colubris (Lmn.). Ruby-throated Humming- bird. Generally distributed, summer visitor, common. At Balsam Station, in August, I found this species exceedingly abundant. Called "Whizzers'' by the mountaineers of that Section. (Univ. Coll.). Order PASSERES. Perching Birds. Family TYRANNID^. Tyrant Flycatchers. Genus Tyrannus Cuvier. *132. (444). T. tyrannus (Linn.). Kingbird. Summer vis- itor, common in middle and coast region, rather rare in mount- ain region. Called also "Bee Martin." (Univ. Coll.). Genus Myiarchus Cabanis. *133. (452). if. crinitus (Linn.). Crested Flycatcher. Sum- mer visitor, generally distril)uted, common. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Sayornis Bonaparte. *134. (456). 8. phoebe (Lath.). Phoebe. Generally distrib- uted, rather rare in winter, common in summer. Middle region nests under bridges and in deserted buildings. I have taken the ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 69 bird from the nest. Brewster reports it as breeding under rocks and earth banks in mountain region. At Chapel Hill wrongly called "Cowbird'' by egg collectors. (Univ. Coll.). Genus CoxTOPUS Cabanis. *135. (459). C. borealis (Swains.). Olive-sided Flycatcher. Taken in south-east corner of Macon countv bv Brewster. He saw several pairs preparing to breed. Buncombe county, rare transient (Cairnsj. *136. (461). C. vlrens (Linn.). Wood Pewee. Summer vis- itor, generally distributed, common. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Empidonax Cabanis. * 137. (465.) E. acadius (Gmel.). Acadian Flycatcher. Com- mon summer visitor in middle and mountain region. Brewster says it is common below 3,000 feet. 138. (467). E. minimus Baird. Least Flycatcher. Sum- mer visitor, mountain region, generally distributed though not common (vide Brewster and Cairns). Family ALAUDID.E. Larks. Genus Otocoris Bonaparte. 139. (474). 0. alpestris (Linn.). Horned Lark. Middle region, winter visitor, sometimes very common. (Univ. Coll.). Family CORVID^. Crows, Jays, Magpies, Etc. Genus Cyanocitta Strickland. *140. (477). C. cristata (Linn.). Blue Jay. Resident, gen- erally distributed, common. (Univ. Coll.). Genus CoRVUS Linnaeus. 14L (486). C. corax sinuatus (Wagl.). Mexican Raven(?). The following subspecies (C c. principalis) was separated from C c. sinuatus by Ridgway since the latter was reported in the State. Brewster and Cairns l)oth report the Raven from the mountain retjion ; the former savs it is "common almost everv- where above 3,000 feet." On the principle that the avian fauna of the higher portions of the mountain region is similar to that 70 JOURNAL OF THE of the Canadian avian fauna, as Brewster has shown, the form from this region would be that of the Northern Raven. In the absence of positive testimony on this point I place this sub- species in the list provisionally. 142. ( — ). C. corax prlncvpalis Ridgw. Northern Raven. One specimen taken by Clark and Morgan, of New Bern, and now in their possession, I have determined as belonging to this subspecies. I saw the specimen and took the following meas- urements: Length 26.50, wing 16.75, tail 10.25, tarsus 2.85, culmen 3.19, depth of bill at nostril 1.12. The Raven is reported from the coast region by Brimley, but no measurements given. It may be quite possible that both subspecies, and inter- grade forms, w^ould occur, situated, as the State is, somewhat between the Canadian and Mexican faunae. 143.(488). C. americanus Au(\. American Crow. Resident, generally distributed, common. (Univ. Coll.). 144. (490). C. ossifragus Wils. Fish Crow. New Bern (Clark and Morgan). Family ICTERIDJE. Blackbirds, Orioles, Etc. Genus DoLiCHONYX Swainson. 145. (494). D. oryzivorus (Linn.). Bobolink. Transient vis- itor, rare in the mountain region, more common eastward. (Coll. of 1877). Called also " Reedbird,'' " Ricebird.'' Genus MoLOTHRUS Swainson. 146. (495). 31. ater (Bodd.). Cowbird. Common transient. Genus Agelaius Yieillot. *147. (498). A. ijhoeniceus {\J\nu.). Red-winged Blackbird. Resident throughout the State, common, rarer in mountain region, except as a transient, and confined to the lower valleys. (Priv. Coll.). Genus Sturnella Vieillot. *I48. (501). S. magna (Linn.). Meadowlark. Common in winter throughout the State; rare in summer in mountain region. Said to breed sparingly in Macon county {vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 71 Genus Icterus Brisson. Subii'eiuis Pendulinus Vieillot. *149. (506). I. spurius (Linn.). Orchard Oriole. Summer visitor, common throughout the State and confined to low coun- tries in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). Subjienus Yphantes Vieillot. 150. (507). J. ^a/6it/a (Linn.). Baltimore Oriole. Rare tran- sient in middle region, rather rare summer visitor in mountain region ; probably breeds there. One in Univ. Coll. taken by G. W. Edwards in Allegheny county. Genus ScoLECOPHAGUS Swainson. 15L (509.) S. carolinus (Miill.). Rusty Blackbird. Rather common transient. (Univ. Coll.). Genus QuiscALUS Vieillot. Subgenus Quiscalus. *152. (511). Q.quiscul a (Linn.). Purple Grackle. Common transient in middle and coast region, rather rare summer visitor in mountain region. Seen breeding in Asheville by Brewster. (Priv. Coll.). Subgenus Megaquiscalus Cassin. 153. (513). Q. major Vieill. Boat-tailed Grackle. Rare transient in mountain region (vide Cairns); common resident in coast region, where it probably breeds. Family FRINGILLID.E. Finches, Sparrows, Etc. Genus Carpodacus Kaup. 154. (517). C. purpureus (Gmel.). Purple Finch. Tran- sient, and winter visitor throughout the State, sometimes very common. At Chapel Hill, in the spring of 1887, hundreds remained on the University grounds for a month or more, asso- ciated with numbers of Spinus tristis, and feeding on the buds and tender seeds of the elm. Brewster reported it abundant at Old Fort, and thinks it breeds there. (Univ. Coll.). 72 • JOURNAL OF THE Genus LoxiA Linn sens. 155. (521). L. carvirostra minor (Brehni.). American Cross- bill. Small fl(x;ks on Black Mountains, above 5,000 feet; said to appear at Highlands in winter regularly (vide Brewster). Rare transient at Raleigh (Brimley). Genus Spinus Koch. "^166. (529). S. tristis (Linn.). American Goldfinch. Resi- dent in middle and mountain regions; abundant especially in winter. In August I found it abundant at Balsam Station. (Univ. Coll.). 157. (533). /S^. /)i??.it6- (Wils.). Pine Siskin. Mountain region, common transient, and rare winter visitor (vide Cairns); Black Mountains June 2d, 1886 (vide Brewster); middle region, sometimes common in winter (Brimley). Genus Pooc.ETES Baird. 158. (540). P. graraineus (Gmel.). Vesper Sparrow. Com- mon during winter in middle and mountain regions. Cairns says rather common in Buncombe county in summer. (LTniv. Coll.). Genus Ammodramus Swainson. Subgenus Passerculus Bonaparte. 159. (542a). A. sandwichensis savanna (Wils.). Savanna Sparrow, Winter visitor, middle region, rather common. (Priv. Coll.). Subgenus Coturxiculus Bonaparte. '''IGO. (546). A, savannarum passerinus(W\h.). Grasshopper Sparrow. Common during summer near Franklin in mountain region and apparently breeding (vide Brewster). Rare transient eastward. Genus Zoxotrichia Swainson. 161. (554). Z. leucophrys (Forst.). White-crowned Sparro\v. Accidental at Raleigh. (Coll. of James Busbee). 162. (558). Z. albicoUis (Gmel.). White-throated Sparrow. Common winter visitor throughout the State. (Univ. Coll.). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 73 Genus Spizella Bonaparte. *163. (oGO). 8. socialis (Wils.). Chipping Sparrow. Sum- mer visitor, common, and generally distributed. (Univ. Coll.). 164. (561). S. pallida (Swains.). Clay-colored Sparrow. Accidental. One taken at Chapel Hill, March 8th, 1886. (Univ. Coll.). *105. (563). S. pusilla (Wils.). Field Sparrow. Common resident, and generally distributed. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Passer Brisson. *166. ( — ). P. domeMicu^ (Linn.). Abundant in towns and villages. (Univ. Coll.). Genus JuNCO Wagler. 167. (567). /. hyemalis (Linn.). Slate-colored Junco. Com- mon winter visitor throughout the State. (Univ. Coll.). *168. (567b). J. hyemalis carolinensis Brewst. Carolina Junco. Found by Brewster in summer only on Black Mountains, and at Highlands above elevation of 4,300 feet. Nests collected at the latter place. Found in winter by Batchelder associated with J. hyemalis in valleys. Genus Peuc^ea Audubon. *169. (575a). P. cestivalis bachmanii (Aud.). Bachman's Sparrow. Rare summer visitor. Single specimen taken by Brewster at Franklin. A few taken in March and April, ^85 and '87, at Raleigh by Brimley. One taken from a breeding pair by myself at Chapel Hill. The nest was found by Willie Gulick ; eggs 4, size .63 x.76, dull whitish; nest a bulky struct- ure on the ground made of coarse grasses. I believe the nest and eggs have never before been described. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Melospiza Baird. 170. (581). J/, fasciata (Gmel.). Song Sparrow. Common winter visitor. (Univ. Coll.). 171.(584). 3L fjeorgiana (Ijnth.). Swamp Sparrow. Com- mon transient in mountain region, winter visitor in middle region. 10 74 JOURNAL OF THE Genus Passerella Swainson. 172.(585). P. ^7iaca (Merr.). Fox Sparrow. Common win- ter visitor. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Pjpieo Vieillot. 173.(587). P. erijthrophthalmns{lj\v\u.). Towhee. Common transient in middle region, common resident in mountain region^ and winters in coast region. Probably breeds in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Cardinalis Bonaparte. *174. (593). C. cardinalis (Linn.). Cardinal. Generally distributed, common, resident; lower valleys in mountain region. Called also "Cardinal Grosbeak/' "Winter Redbird/' etc. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Habia Reichenbach. 175. (595). H. ludoviciana (U\\\u.). Rose- breasted Grosbeak. Rare transient in middle region. Summer sojourner on high mountains, range from 3,800 feet to 5,000 feet on Black Mount- ains, and 3,500 feet to 4,500 feet at Highlands {vide Brewster); Craggy Mountain {vide Cairns). Probably breeds. (Univ. Coll.). Genus GuiRACA Swainson. *176. (597). G. Gcerulea (Linn.). Blue Grosbeak. Rather common summer sojourner in middle region, where it breeds. Single specimen seen at Asheville by Brewster. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Passerina Vieillot. *177. (598). P. cyanea (Linn.). Common summer visitor, generally distributed; in mountain I'egion below 4,500 feet. (Univ. Coll.). 178. (601). P. ciris (Linn.). Painted Bunting. Summer visitor Beaufort, (Brimley). Family TANAGRID.F. Tanagers. Genus Piranga Vieillot. *179. (608). P. crythromelafiYieiU. Scarlet Tanager. Spring and autumn transient in middle region, rare. Summer sojourner ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. (0 in mountain region, abundant in hard wood timber of Black Mountain up to 500 feet {vide Brewster, Cairns). It probable- breeds in mountain region. I took a young male at Balsam Station in Auijust, 1887, and saw several others. Two vouns: males and one female taken at Chapel Hill in Septeml^er, 1887. Both males with black wings and tail, female with wings and tail dark ash. One male with black spots on crown and sca- pulars, and faint tinge of reddish on interscapulars and tips of upper tail coverts. Otherwise both males rich olive green on u])per parts, and rich greenish yellow on lower parts. (Univ. Coll.). '^180. (610). P. rubra (Linn.). Summer Tauager. Summer visitor, generally distributed, rather rare and local in mountain region. Seems to breed numerously in middle region. Two females were taken at Cha[)el Hill parti-male-colored ; one taken from a nest was olive-yellow below, olive-green above; heavily washed on entire under parts, neck, lesser wing-coverts, tail-feathers, back, except interscapulars and rump, with red; crown, interscapulars, rump and wings only slightly tinged with reddish. (Univ. Coll.). Family HIRUNDINID.E. Swallows. Genus Progne Boie. *181. (611). P. subis (Linn.). Purple Martin. Summer visitor, rather rare, but sometimes common in localities, usually towns and villages.* Genus Petrochelidon Cabanis. 182. (612). P. lunifrons (Say). Cliff Swallow. Rare tran- sient in mountain region {vide Cairns). Genus Chelidox Forster. 183.(613). C.erythrogaster(^o(\(\.). Barn Swallow. Rather rare transient. Genus Tachyctneta Cabanis. 184. (614). T. bicolor (Vieill.). White-bellied Swallow. Rather common transient in middle and coast region. 76 JOURNAL OF THE Genus Stelgidopteryx Baird. *185. (617). >S'. serripennis (And.). Kough-winged Swallow. Common summer sojourner, generally distributed. Settled por- tions of mountain region up to 2,500 feet, nesting in ledges and clay banks (vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). Familv AMPELID.E. Waxwings, Etc. Genus Ampelis Linnieus. *186. (619). A. cedrorum{WQ\\\.). Cedar Waxwing. Com- mon resident, generally distributed, very common in flocks in winter, rather uncertain and irregular in localities. On Black Mountains a pair preparing to breed at altitude of 5,000 feet (vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). Family LAJSTIID^. Shrikes. Genus Laxius Linnaeus. 187. (622). L. ludovicianus Linn. Loggerhead Shrike. Rather rare winter visitor in middle region. (Univ. Coll.). Family VIREONID.^. Vireos. Genus ViREO Vieillot. Subgenus Vireosylya Bonaparte. *188. (624). V. olivaceus (Linn.). Red-eyed Vireo. Com- mon summer visitor, generally distributed, in mountain region below 4,000 feet. (Univ. Coll.). 189. (626). V. philadelphicus (Cass.). Philadelphia Vireo. Rare transient in mountain region (vide Cairns). 190.(627). T". ^//I'w.s (Vieill.). Warbling Yireo. Rare sum- mer visitor, mountain region (Old Fort and Buncombe county, vide Brewster and Cairns). Subgenus Laniyireo Baird. 191. (628). F. flavifrons Yieill. Yellow-throated Yireo. Summer visitor, rather common in middle and mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 77 192. (629). V. solitanus (\Y Us.). Blue-headed Vireo. Eather common transient in middle and mountain regions, and rare summer visitor in latter place. 193. ( — ). V. solltarlus alticola Brewst. Mountain Solitary Vireo. Mountain region, some places common, in oak and chestnut woods ranging from 4,200 feet to foot of the balsams, 5,000 feet {^vide Brewster). Subgenus ViREO Vieillot. 194. (631). V. noveboracensis (Gmel.). White-eyed Yireo. Rather rare summer visitor, generally distributed. (Univ. Coll.). Family MNIOTILTID.^. Wood AVarblers. Genus Mniotilta Yieillot. *195. (636.) 31. varia (Linn.). Black and White Warbler. Common summer visitor, generally distributed. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Protonotaria Baird. 196. (637). P. citrea {Bode].). Prothonotary Warbler. Rare summer visitor, middle region (Brimley). Genus Helinaia Audubon. 197. (638). H. swainsonii And. Swainson's Warbler. One taken at New Bern April 13, 1885, by H. H. Brimley. First record of its occurrence in North Carolina. Genus Helmitherus Rafinesque. 198. (639). U. vermivorus (Gmel.). Worm-eating Warbler. Rather rare transient in middle region, rare summer visitor in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Helminthophila Ridgway. 199.(641). H. pinus (Jj]\)\\.). Blue-winged Warbler. Rare summer visitor in mountain region (Craggy Mount, Cairns). *200. (642). H. chrysoptera (Linn.). Golden-winged Warbler. One taken by Brimley near Raleigh August 26, 1886. Rare summer visitor in mountain region (eggsiaken by Cairns at foot of Craggy Mount June 2, 1885). Brewster found it common in Jackson and Macon counties, ranging from 2,000 feet to 4,000 feet in open oak woodland. 78 JOURNAL OF THE 201. (645). 11. ruficapilla (Wils.). Nashville Warbler. Rare transient in mountain region {vide Cairns). 202.(647). U. 2:>erefjrina{\\\]s.). Tennessee Warbler. Rare transient, middle and mountain regions (Brimley and Cairns). Genus CoMPSOTHLYPiS Cabanis. *203. (648). C. americana (Linn.). Parula AVarbler. Com- mon summer v^isitor throughout the State. (Univ. Coll.). Called also ^^Blue Yellow-baeked Warbler." Genus Dendroica Gray. Subc>:enus Perissoglossa Baird. 204. (650). D. tigrina (Gmel.). Cape May AVarbler. Rare transient in Buncombe county {vide Cairns). Subgenus Dendroica Gray. *205. (652). D. cestiva (Gmel.). Yellow Warbler. Common summer visitor, generally distributed ; in mountain region below 2,800 feet, along streams (vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). *206. (654). D. ccerulescens (Gmel.). Black-throated Blue Warbler. Common transient in middle, and also sojourner in mountain region; Brewster found it abundant at Highlands in Rhododendron swamps and along Rhododendron bordered streams of Black Mountains, says it probably breeds. (Univ. Coll.). 207. (655). D.coronata(L\nn.). Myrtle Warbler. Common winter visitor throughout the State, sometimes appearing in large flocks. (Univ. Coll.). '^ Yellow-rumped Warbler." 208. (657). D. maculosa (Gmel.). Magnolia Warbler. Rather rare transient in middle, and more common in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). 209. (658). D. ccendea (Wils.). C?erulean Warbler. Rare transient in middle and mountain region. *210. (659). B. pensykamca{\ Aim.). Chestnut-sided Warbler. Rather rare transient in middle, and common summer sojourner in mountain region, where it is generally distributed 2,000 feet to 4,000 feet {vide Brewster). I took a pair at Balsam Station in Augu.st, 1887; probably breeds. (Priv. Coll.). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 79 211. (661). D. striata (Fovst.). Blaok-poll Warbler. Rather rare transient visitor in middle and coast region. (Coll. of 1877). *212. (662). I), blai'hhumke (Gmel.). Blackburnian Warbler. Middle and nionntain region^ transient in former and snmmer sojonrner in latter, where it is somewhat irregnlarly distributed; rare in Buncond)e connty (Cairns) ; Jackson and Macon coun- ties abundai't everywhere above 3,000 feet, and on crest of Cowee range, and about Highlands the commonest of birds; evidently breeding (Brewster). *213. (663). D. domhiica (Linn.). Yellow-throated Warbler. Summer visitor, generally distributed, rather rare. (Univ. Coll.). *214. (667). D. V ir ens (Gme].). Black-throated Green Warbler. Rare transient throughout the State except on Black Mountains, where Brewster found it abundant in the balsam forests above 0,000 feet; he says it probably breeds. *215. (671). D. vigorsii (And.). Pine Warbler. Common resident in middle and coast regions, rare resident in mountain region, but common as a transient. (Univ. Coll.). 216. (672). D. palmarum (Gmel.). Palm Warbler. Rather rare transient and winter visitor, (Univ. Coll.). *217. (673). I), discolor {Y\q\\\.). Prairie Warbler. Rather common summer visitor in middle region. Brewster found it common at Old Fort. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Seiurus Swainson. 218. (674). .S'. aurocapillus (Linn.). Oven-bird. ComuKKi transient in middle region, and common summer sojourner in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). 219.(675). 8.noveho7'acensis{Gme\.). Water-Thrush. Rather common transient in middle region, and rare summer visitor in mountain region (S. ncEvius, vide Cairns). (Univ. Coll.). *220. (676). S. motadUa (Vieill.). Lotiisiana Water-Thrush. Rare summer visitor in middle and mountain retrion. Genus Geothlypis Cabanis. Subgenus Opohornis Baird. 221. (677). G. formosa (Wils.). Kentucky Warbler. Sun- nier visitor, rare in middle region, rather common in mountain 80 JOURXAL OF THE region, where it is generally distributed in valleys and np mount- ain sides to 3,500 feet. 222. (678). G. agilis (Wils.). Conneeticut AVarbler. Taken at Raleigh by Brim ley October 15, 1884. Subgenus Geothlypis Cabanis. *223. (681). G. trichas (Linn.). Maryland Yellow-throat. Summer visitor, rather common throughout the State. (Univ. Coll.). Genus IcTERiA Yieillot. *224. (683). I.virens{\Jinn.). Yellow-breasted Chat. Every- where abundant, summer sojourner. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Sylyania Nuttall. 225. (684). *S'. mitrata (Gmel.). Hooded Warbler. Rare transient throughout the State, and rare summer sojourner in mountain region, where it is generally distributed in ^'Rhodo- dendron thickets along streams, ranging to 3,800 feet" [vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). 226. (685). S. pusilla (Wils.). Wilson's Warbler. Rare transient (Busbee and Cairns). *227. (6S6). 8.ca7iadensis(L\nn.). Canadian Warbler. Sum- mer sojourner in mountain region. "Abundant from 3,000 feet to tops of highest mountains; breeds at Highlands" (Brewster). Genus Setophaga Swainson. *228. (687). S. ruticilla (Linn.). American Redstart. Com- mon transient and rather rare summer sojourner in middle and mountain regions. (Univ. Coll.). Family MOTACILLID^^. Wagtails. Genus Anthus Bechsteio. Subgenus Anthus. 229. (697). ^. j^ensiYrrtmcits (Lath.). American Pipit. Win- ter visitor in middle and coast region, irregularly distributed ; rare transient in Buncombe county {vide Cairns). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 81 Family TROGLODYTID^. Wrens, Thrashers, Etc. Genus Mimus Boie. *230. (703). 31. poly f/loitis (L'mn.). Mockingbird. Rare and local summer visitor in mountain region, where it breeds spar- ingly ; abundant resident and breeder in middle and coast region. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Galeoscoptes Cabanis. "^231. (704). G. caroUnensls (Linn.). Catbird. Common summer visitor throughout the State. Winters in portions of coast region. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Harpoehyxchus Cabanis. Subgenus Methpiopterus Reichenbach. *232. (705). H. rufiis (Linn.). Brown Thrasher. Rather common summer visitor. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Thryothorus Vieillot. Subgenus Thryothorus. *233. (718). T.ludomcianus{ljdiih.), Carolina Wren. Com- mon resident in entire State, breeding throughout its range. (Univ. Coll.). Subgenus Thryomanes Sclater. *234. (719). T. beioichii (And.). Bewick's Wren. Resident in mountain region, rather common in summer in towns, breeds in sheds and out-buildings (vide Brewster). Genus Troglodytes Vieillot. Subgenus Troglodytes. 235. (721). T.aedon\\Q\\\. House Wren. Rare transient. (Univ. Coll.). Subgenus Anorthura Rennie. 236. (722). T. kiemalis Yieill. Winter Wren. Rather rare winter visitor in middle region; resident in mountain region; ^'abundant in balsams of Black Mountains 5,000 feet to 6,000 feet [vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). 11 82 JOURNAL OF THE Genus CiSTOTiiORUS Cabaiiis. Subgenus Cistothorus. 237. (724). a stellaris (Licht.). Short-billed Marsh Wren. Rare transient, Buncombe county {vide Cairns). Subii^enus Telmatodytes Cabanis. 238. (725). 0. palustris (Wils.). Long-billed Marsh Wren. Rare transient, taken at Raleigh in ' April and May, 1886 (Briniley). Family CERTHIID.E. Creepers. Genus Certhia Linnaeus. *239. (726). C. famillaris americana (Bonap.). Brown Creeper. Common winter visitor and transient in middle region; resident in mountain region, common in winter, abundant transient, and rare in summer. '^Common at Highlands and Black Moun- tains, in balsams, above 4,000 feet, breeds'' (vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). Family PARID^. Nuthatches and Tits. Genus SiTTA Linnaeus. *240. (727j. S. carolinensis Lath. White-breasted Nuthatch. Rather common resident throughout the State. (Univ. Coll.). *24L (728). S. canadensis Linn. Red-breasted Nuthatch. Rare winter visitor in middle region; rare summer visitor in mountain region. In balsams of Black Mountains from 5,000 feet to 6,000 feet, breeds (Brewster). *242. (729). S. j)usilla Lath. Brown-headed Nuthatch. Rather common resident in middle and coast regions; rather local. Genus Parus Linnaeus. Subgenus Lophophanes Kaup. *243. (731). P. bicolor Linn. Tufted Titmouse. Common resident, generally distributed. (Univ. Coll.). Subgenus Parus Linna3us. *244. (735). P. atricapiUus L'mn. Chickadee. Rather com- mon resident in mountain region, breeds (vide Brewster and Batchelder). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 83 *245. (736). p. carolinensis Alu]. Carolina Chickadee. Com- mon resident throuohout the State. (Univ. Coll.). Family SYLVIID^l^. Wari)lers, Kinglets and Gnateatchers. Genus Regulus Cuvier, 246. (748). R. satrapa Lieht. Golden-crowned Kinglet. Rather common winter visitor in all parts of the State; in sum- mer balsams of Black Mountains {vide Brewster). Probably breeds, and is a resident in mountain region. (Univ. Coll.). 247. (749). R. calendula (Linn.). Ruby-crowned Kinglet. Rare transient in mountain region; rather comaion winter vis- itor in middle and coast regions. Genus PoLiOPTiLA Sclater. *248. (751). P. ccerulea (Linn.). Blue-gray Gnatcatcher. Common summer visitor. (L^niv. Coll.). Family TURDID^l^. Thrushes, Solitares, Stonechats, Blue- birds, Etc. Genus TuuDUS Lin mens. Subgenus Hylocichla Baird. *249. (755). T. niustelinus Gnni\. Wood Thrush. Abundant throughout the State, breeds everywhere. (Univ. Coll.). *250. (756). T. fascesecns Steph. Wilson's Thrush. Rare transient in middle region; summer visitor in mountain region; Craggy Mountain (Cairns); abundant on Black Mountains and at Highlands from 3,500 to 5,000 feet; breeds at Highlands (vide Brewster). (Univ. Coll.). 25L (757a). T. alicice bicknclli (Ridgw.). Bicknell's Thrush. Rare transient near Raleigh (Brimley). 252. (758a). T. udulatus swainsonii (Cab.). Olive-backed Thrush. Rather common transient visitor in middle reirion : summer visitor in mountain region: '^common on Craira:v Mountain" (vide Cairns), Does it breed;? (Univ. Coll.). 253. (759b). T. aonaiaschkoi pallasii [Odh.). Hermit Thrush. Rather common winter visitor throughout the State. (L^niv. Coll.). 84 JOURNAL OF THE Genus Merula Leach. *254. (TGI). M. migratoria (L\un.). American Robin. Rather common residentj sometimes sparingly in locah'ties, abundant during spring and autumn migrations. (Univ. Coll.). Genus Si ALIA Swainson. *255. (766). S. sialis (L'mn.). Bluebird. Common resident. (Univ. Coll.). ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 85 APPENDIX. (containing a list of BIRDS WHICH WE MAY REASONABLY EXPECT TO YET TAKE IN THE STATE). 1. (36). Stercorarius pomai'inus (Temm.). Pomarine Jaeger. 2. (37). Stercorarius 2^(^f^vasiticus (Ijmu.). Parasitic Jseger. 3. (38). Stercorarius longicaudus Vieill. Long-tailed Jseger. 4. (59). Larus franklinii Sw. & Rich. Franklin^s Gull. 5. (63). Gelochelidon nilotica (Hasselq.). Gull-billed Tern. 6. (64). Sterna tschegrava Lepech. Caspian Tern. 7. (67). " sandvicensis acuflavida (Cabot). Cabot's Tern. 8. (71). " paradiscea Briinn. Arctic Tern. 9. (72). '' dougaUi Montag. Roseate Tern. 10. (79). Anous stoUdus (Linn.). Noddy. 11. (89). Puffinus major Faber. Greater Shearwater. 12. (92). '' auduboni Finsch. Audubon's Shearwater. 13. (94). " stricklandi Ridgw. Sooty Shearwater. 14. (106). Oceanodroma leucorpoa Vieill. Leach's Petrel. 15. (109). Oceanites oeeanicus (Kuhl). Wilson's Petrel. 16. (115). Sula sula (Linn.). Boobey. 17.(117). '^ bassana (Jumu.). Gannet. 18.(118). Anhinr/a anhinga (Linn.). Anhinga. 19. (119). Phalacrocorax carbo (Linn.). Cormorant. 20.(120). " dilophus floridanus {Km\.). Florida Cormorant. 21. (126). Pelecanus fuscus Linn. Brown Pelican. 22. (128). Fregata aquila (Linn.). Man-o'-War Bird. 23. (172a). Branta canadensis hutchinsii (Sw. & Rich.). Hutchins' Goose. 24. (174). Branta nigricans (Larr.). Black Brant. 25. (181). Olor buccinator (Rich.). Trumpeter Swan. 26. (183). Ajaja ojaja [JAnn.). Roseate Spoonbill. 27. (184). Giiara alba (Linn.). AVhite Ibis. S() JOURNAL OF THE 28. (186). Plegadis aidumnaUs (Hassalq.), Glossy Ibis. 29. (202). Nydicorax nydicorax ncevius (Bodd.). Black- crowned Nii»:ht Heron. 30. (204). Gnis americana (Linn.) Whooping Crane. 31. (206). " mexicana (Miill.). Sandhill Crane. 32. (216). Porzana jamaicensis (Gmel.). Black Rail. 33. (223). Phalaropits lobatus (Linn.). Northern Phalarope. 34. (224). " tricolor (Yieill.). Wilson^s Phalarope. 35. (225). Pecurvlrostra americana Gmel. American Avocet. 36. (226). Himantopus mexicanus (Miill.). Black-necked Stilt. 37. (233). Micropalama Jiimantopus (Bonap.). Stilt Sand- ])iper. 38. (234). Tringa canutus Linn. Knot. 39. (235). " maritima Briinn. Pnrple Sandpipei*. 40.(240). " fuscicollisY leiW. White-nimped Sandpiper. 41. (241). " bairdii (Coues). Baird's Sandpiper. 42. (246). Ereunetes pusillus (Linn.). Seniipalmated Sand- piper. 43. (247). Ereunetes occidentalis Lawr. Western Sandpi})er. 44. (249). Limosa fedoa (Linn.). Marbled God wit. 45. (251). '* hcemastica (Linn.). Hudsonian Godwit. 46. (262). Tringites subrujicollis (YiaWi.). Buff- breasted Sand- piper. 47. (265). Numenius hudsonieus Lath. Hudsonian Curlew. 48. (266). " borealis (Forst.). Eskimo Curlew. 49. (277). ^Egialitis meloda (Ord.). Piping Plover. 50. (280). '' wilsonia (Ord.). Wilson's Plover. 51. (286). Htematopus palliatus Temm. American Oyster Catcher. 52. (320). Colwnbigalliiia passerina (Linn.). Ground Dove. 53. (328). Ekmus leucurus (Vieill.). AVhite-tailed Kite. 54. (329). Idinia miasissippiends (Wils.). Mississippi Kite. 55. (347). Archibuteo lagopus [J^vmw).). Rough-legged Plawk. b^. (365). Strix pratincola Bonap. American Barn Owl. 57. (372). Nyctala acadica (Gmel.). Saw-Whet Owl. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 87 58. (376). Nyctea nyctea (Linn.). Snowy Owl. 59. (445). Tyrannus dominicensis (Gniel.). Gray Kingbird. 60. (463). Empidonax flaviventris Baird. Yellow-bellied Fly- catcher. 61. (460a). Empidonax pimllus trailil (And.). Traill's Fly- catcher. 62. (511b). Qidscalas quiscula ceneus (Ridgw.). Bronzed Grackle. 63. (534). Pledrophenax nivcdls (Linn.). Snowflake. 64.(536). Calcariuslapponicus {Li'mu.). Lapland Longsjnir. 65. (541). Ammod ramus prlnceps(M'dyn.). Ipswich Sparrow. hensloiuil (And.). Henslow's Sparrow. leconteii (And.). Leconte's Sparrow. caudacutus (Gmel.). Sharped-tailed " nelsoni Allen. Nelson's mariiimus ( Wi Is.). Seaside Sparrow. 71. (559). Spizella monticola (Gmel.). Tree Sparrow. 72. (583). Melospiza lincolni (And.). Lincoln's Sparrow. 73. (604). Spiza americana (Gmel.). Dickeissel. 74. (612). Petrochelidon lunifrons (Say). Cliff Swallow. 75. (616). Clivicola riparia (Linn.). Bank Swallow. 76. (646). Helmhithophila celata (Say). Orange-crowned Warbler. 77. (660). Dendroicacastanea{y\^\\^.), Bay-breasted Warbler. 78. (670). " hirtlandi Baird. Kirtland's Warbler. 79. (672a). " pahnai-um hypochrysea Ridgw. Yellow Palm Warbler. 80. (679). Geothlypis Philadelphia {\Y\U.). Mourning Warbler. 81. (757). Tardus alicice Baird. Gray-cheeked Thrnsh. 66. (547). (( 67. (548). i( 68. (549). it Sparrow. 69. (549a). li Sparrow. 70. (550). ({ 88 JOURNAL OF THE No. VII. SINGULAR ADAPTATION IN NEST-MAKING BY AN ANT, CREMASTOGASTER LINEOLATA"' SAY. [See plate at back of Journal.] GEORGE F. ATKINSON. A month ago I received an ant's nest, sent by Assistant En- gineer Henry A. Brown to General W. Lewis, of Goldsboro, N. C. The nest was built several feet from the ground on a bush, in the marshes bordering Broad creek, Hyde county, N. C. This ant usually nests " under stones or underneath and within the decayed matter of old logs and stumps. This material is sometimes prepared by the ant as a paper-like pulp, and arranged into cells and chambers, which are attached to the surface of the logs.'^t This nest is about eighteen inches long by twelve inches in circumference at greatest diameter. I made a longitudinal sec- tion of it, and had a photograph taken, so as to represent both the external form and internal structure. The ants were alive in the nest when I received it. They were chloroformed before sectioning the nest. I took from the nest about one-fourth pint of adults, pupse, and larvae. They were collected in a mass through the chambers within a space four inches in length of the nest. This space is about two-thirds the distance from the lower end. The material composing the cells in this space is lighter in color than the other internal parts. It appeared also in the photograph, as can be seen by looking at the right-hand figure. Probably it will be visible in the photoengravure. The material used in making the nest seems to be the same used by the ant in making its nest under stones, etc. Beside the woody pulp, a microscopic examination seems to reveal also *The ant was determined for me through the kindness of Prof. C. V. Riley. tComstock's Report on Cotton Insects, 1879, p. 188. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 89 some portions of dried grass. The nest is supporte