— - mF Vos ~ FORTHE PROPLE FOR EDVCATION FOR SCIENCE LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY LIBRARY JOURNAL: ~J7 * OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society VOL. XIV 1897 CHAPEL HILL, N. O. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY Journal of the Mitchell Society. CONTENTS. VOL. XIV. 1897. Notes on the Natural History of the Wilmington Region.—H. V. PIE ee RI Os os RE sake oscars Ae te, kd. ne aac cad Re oe es 1 The Oxalates of Zirconinm. —F. P. Venable and Chas. Baskerville........ 4 The Halogen Salts of Zirconium.—I/". P. Venable and Chas. Basker- ENON te cae Sih SAMMI Is Me aire Shaw og SCin 6 us Sade ha SL 12 The Glabrous-Leaved Species of Asarum of the Southern U. S. og SOIL © oR oe RR A: SER OT a A SAE OER RNR ok Dy SOE 21 A Review of the Atomic Weight of Zirconium.—/’. P. Venable........... 27 Notes on Darhya and Buckleya.—W. W. Ashe... cece hice cceccecceccceceecs 46 Habs weyntoni pp. NOV.—W.-W. Ashes... 2.0. do xne Ronde eo oecdacenccedes 5L On the Origin of the Vertebrated Sense Organs.—H. V. Wilson........... 56 nremeyare NAG MOEN eT AIS —— 5 FT COR. sos. 35005 So bees econ DN ee eS wk Wellstite, a New Maneral. sik t AShe. a ea a ee 62 MP MN es rei Nace sick esc dskiensn ia odes awece etwas i PEE me Agee el omeeae 70 IMEEM eS Ga Pune Ne es fh IRR As v6 cau d goe Bua aed GeV ewhera ne oo EEE tae 72 Anthophyliite............. et es ARON ER ERE (SP. 24 Ge TET GA RO ES a ee i SURED DoS a, Pk 75 HIMStAG (CBTONZICC):5. jiccoccce cccedassicaeeteccreses a deiddela deere sala aia Soe eemeneets Pama ts. ft Pomerald Wary sve Ma 3 aes [See RUS ROE SIA MER Se FE 2 Sle Rep 89 UNS 02S ae ee Se i eP y ae eae Fe Phar thee eg ey Bey 80 © LUCIAN i SAMS Nore a8 Wy a RRS Ph abet NCEA (SP oy ch 82 3) JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society. VOLUME XIV. me eee PART “FIRS. JANUAR Y-- JUNE. 1897. POST OFFICE: CHAPEL HILL, N. C. ISSUED FROM THE UNIVERSITY PRESS CHAPEL HILL, N. C. 1897 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Notes on the Natural History of the Wilmington Region. Fa OW ge WAlSODD. 5 gic ie oo a ik a, ponies) ae ne 1 The Oxalates of Zirconium. : i; P. Venable and Charles Baskerville, ............5.0ee 4 The Halogen Salts of Zirconium. i F. P. Venable and Charles Baskerville................ 12 The Glabrous-Leaved Species of Asarum of the Southern United states. 1.) W. W. ASHE... 065, . 60% Sees 5 + a steels anna ens ena a1 JOURNAL Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society. FOURTEENTH YEAR—PART FIRST. 1ISO7. NOTES ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE WILMINGTON REGION. _ H. V. WILSON, A brief collecting trip to the vicinity of Wilmington, N. C., made about the middle of April, oreatly impressed me with the natural history advantages of the résionw.:, T publish these few notes in the hope that they may be of service to other naturalists who think of visiting the Southern coast. In Wilmington itself no one can fail to notice the ad- mirable shade tree, the laurel oak (Quercus laurtfolia Michx.), socommon along the streets. This tree in Wil- mington passes under the name of water oak; in South Carolina it is known as the Darlington oak. Its straight bole, symmetrical top and moderate size vive it an ele- gance of shape well suited to city streets, and the im- pression of finish is heightened by the glossy aspect of the toliage. From the city there runs a most excellent road, eight miles long, to Wrightsville, a settlement on the coast. The road is a well kept shell road, smooth, hard, and good for bicycling. Scrub oaks, elms, long-leaf pines and cypresses edge it, and near the sound the full @reen heads of the live oaks are seen on all sides. In the open 2 JOURNAL OF THE meadow-like places (savannahs) to the right and left of the road there grow in great abundance insectivorous plants, the most interesting members, to the general bi- ologist at least, of that rich Wilmington flora made known through the labors of Curtis, Wood and other systematic botanists. The yellow-flowered pitcher plant, Sarracenia flava, dots the savannahs in all directions; its great flower (four inches wide) upheld by a scape one to two feet, making ita conspicuous object. The fly-trap, Dionea, and sun-dew, Drosera, neither in flower at the time of my visit, are scattered thickly about. Intermin- g@led with these are a blue and yellow species of butter- wort, Pinguicula, their bright flowers standing out clearly against the (at this time) brownish savannah and often leading one to patches of Dion@wa and Drosera, which otherwise would have been passed by unnoticed. These five insectivorous plants may sometimes be found growing together in a little patch of ground, scarcely larger than a square foot. The topography of the Wrightsville district is that characteristic of the Carolina coast, and in a less degree of the Southern coast in gezeral. A sound separates the mainland from a seaward strip of land, known as the ‘banks.’ Wrightsville, largely made up of houses occu- pied only during the summer, is on the mainland. Oppo- site it, on the banks, is a newer summer settlement. Between the twe, the sound is crossed by a railroad tres- tle, the piles of which afford good collecting. The sound something less than-two miles wide, is divided into a narrow outer portion, adjoining the banks and known as the banks channel, and a wider inner por- tion, studded with sandy-mud shoals. The banks chan- nel 1s a narrow but pretty boating ground, opening out to sea through two inlets, one recently made in a heavy storm. Alone the inner edge of the channel lie some ise lands, the ‘hammocks,’ wooded with live oaks, about ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 3 which jackdaws (Quéscalus major) were flying. This bird is said to spend the winter here. At high water one can sail over many of the shoals of the inner part of the sound, but at low water the course from the mainland to the banks channel is a meandering one. ‘he shoals are alive with worms, Arezicola, Dio- patra, Clymenella and other annelids, along with the ereat Balanoglossus, were dug up in quick succession. The reddish egg masses of Arenicola lay about in abund- ance on the flats. The low water collecting in the shoal part of the sound is very easy. Pushing along in a skiff through the shallow channels between the flats, one finds starfish (As/eréas), the red and white sea-urchins (Aréa- claand Toxopneustes), abundant crabs and other common bottom forms. Scattered about over the bottom in great numbers is the interesting anemone, Certanthus america- nus. ‘The tubes that were dug up were something over a foot in length; they contained animals, which of course had greatly contracted, about six inches long. This dis- tinctively Southern actinia, originally found on the South Carolina coast by Professor Louis Agassiz (Verrill, Re- vission of the Polypi of E. Coast of U. S., p. 32. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I.), has been observed by Mr. Wm. Stimpson and Professor McMurrich at Beau- fort, N. C., where I have seen it myself. It is, however, far more abundant at Wrightsville, and any one wishing to work out the life-history of this remarkable form could find no better locality than the latter place. I may add that the reproductive organs of the specimens I collected were very small. The breeding season probably comes on later. Just before high water I towed in the neighborhbod of the old inlet. As I had anticipated from previous expe- riences in Beaufort harbor at this time of year, not much of interest was in the water. Small hydromeduse, crus- lacean larve, abundant Sagi//as, make up the tow stuff. Later in the year, doubtless as at Beaufort, the towing is 4 JOURNAL OF THE excellent. I am told that abundant large jelly-fish and Portuguese men-of-war make their appearance in August and September. rah The sea-beach has a very gentle slope, and judging in part from specimens sent me by. Mr. Chas. M. Whitlock, of Wilmington, many things of interest are to be had just beyond the line of breakers, where the sea is frequently caJm enough to permit collecting. In the main the Wrightsville fauna is evidently very similar to that of Beaufort (see the lists in Studies of Biol. Lab. Johns Hop- kins Univ., Vol. IV., No. 2, and the list of annelids by Professor Andrews, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. Vol. XIV,, No. 852). I may add that some of the local collectors would recognize, froma description, many of the striking forms, such as Chacloplerus, Chalina arbuscula, Lepto- gorgia virgulata, all of which may be had here.’ 1From Science N. S., Vol. VI. No. 135. July.30, 1897. (CONTRIBUTIONS TO THI CHEMISTRY OF ZIRCONIUM. NO. 6.) THE OXALATES OF ZIRCONIUM. BY F. P. VENABLE AND CHARLES BASKERVILLE. The text-books of chemistry make either very little or no reference to the oxalates of zirconium. Beyond an occasional reference to the oxalate or basic oxalate gotten by precipitating oxalic acid or an oxalate, we can find lit- tle mention of these compounds. Behrens, in his micro- chemical work, speaks of an oxalate prepared as colorless pyramids by precipitating a solution of zirconium sulphate with potassium binoxalate, but no analyses are given, and the crystals cceuld scarcely have been the pure oxalate. Paykull’ speaks of double oxalates being prepared with ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 5 the alkaline oxalates (1:2) and of his failure to prepare the neutral oxalate. His methods, and indeed full results, are unknown to us, as we did not have access to the orig- inal paper. . We may summarize the work which follows in the suc- ceeding pages by saying that we found it possible to pre- pare the basic oxalates by precipitation. This was usu- ally in the form of Zr(C,O,),, GZr(OH),, though other ratios were gotten. The neutral oxalate we did not succeed in preparing, but instead the tendency seems to be toward the formation of the acid oxalate, Zr(C,O,),.H,C,O,.8H,O. This tendency toward the formation of acid salts “was shown also in the double oxalates. T'wo.of these were prepared. For sodium, Zr(C,O,),,3Na,C,O,.H,C,O,.5H,O, and for potassium the salt [Zr(C,O,),],.(K,C,O,),. H,C,O,. 8H,O.. The oxalate with amonium as a constituent was not so easy of preparation in a pure state. The com- pound secured was Zr(C,O,),.2(NH,),C,O,. The experi- ments and analyses are given in detail. ZIRCONIUM OXALATES. The Oxalate Gotten by Precipfitation.—On the addition of a saturated solution of oxalic acid to a slightly acid solution of zirconium chloride until no further precipita- tion occurred, a gelatinuous precipitate formed which had very nearly the composition Zr(C,O,),.2Z4r(OH),. Analy- sis I gave Zr, 46.39, and C,O,, 30.89, instead of the theo- retical 46.40 and 30.93 respectively. The filtrate from this was turbid, and on standing yielded another precipi- tate which had nearly the composition 2Zr(C,O,),.3Zr (OH),. : The basic oxalates are very difficultly soluble in acids, and of extremely fine subdivision, settling slowly and passing through even the best filters. It does not seem probable that they could be secured of very constant com- 1O0fv. af. Vet. At. Forhandl. ref. in Ber. d. chem. Ges., 12, 1719, 6 JOURNAL OF THE position. Probably basic oxalates with many different ratios between the oxalate and the hydroxide might be secured. On drying at 100°, or even a little lower, the oxalic acid is gradually volatilized and lost. This is true of all the oxalates and double oxalates prepared so that. the only mode of drying these preparations was between filter paper. The Acid Oxalate Prepared by Crystallization.—In preparing this oxalate, zirconium hydroxide was dissolved in oxalic acid. The hydroxide is quite soluble in oxalic acid, and aconcentrated solution is readily obtained. Se 25.28 20.53 ys AS ee 2 74.55 W512 74.47 These are calculated upon the water-free basis. The crystals contained 29.34 and 29.27 per cent. of water respectively, where the salt Zr(C,O,),.H,C,O,.8H,O con- tains 28.90 per cent. Other crops of crystals contained percentages of zirconium not ‘varying greatly from those @iven above as 28.14, 27.62, 24.9, 23.83. The percentage of zirconium in the normal oxalate is 33.96. ZIRCONIUM SODIUM OXALATE. The addition of sodium oxalate toa slightly acid solu- tion of zirconium chloride gives a gelatinous white pre- cipitate. Most of this dissolves in an excess of the oxa- late. ‘The undissolved portion settles to the bottom, and after prolonged standing, a second layer of a more pow- dery appearance forms. This can also be gotten by con- centration of the filtrate from the first precipitate. An- alysis showed that the first gelatinous precipitate was chiefly Zr(OH),. The second precipitate was a double oxalate of zirconium and sodium, but was either of incon- 8 JOURNAL OF THE stant composition (varying ratios of sodium to the zir- conium), or was decomposed by the washing. The analyses, calculated on a dry basis, gave: IV. Wie VI. Pere oreo pe es 53.12 46.86 41.98 ier ab eperan , 9.16 4.10 1.07 ea hanmetes NS Gam 38.06 39.64 42.95 If the solution made with the excess of the sodium oxa- late was diluted considerably with water, a gelatinous pre- cipitate was formed, very fineandinsoluble. Precipitates were also formed by the addition of hydrochloric acid. This mode of forming the double oxalate was abandoned, and the following method was adopted with greater suc- cess. Zirconium hydroxide was dissolved in an excess of oxalic acid, and to this a concentrated solution of sodium hydroxide was added, bringing it nearly to neutralization. When the solution was concentrated an abundant crop of crystals was obtained on cooling, a good dal ef heat being evolved in the mixing. Further evaporation yielded other crops of crystals. These were washed, dried between filter paper andanalyzed. The results are given in the following table: VIL. VIII. OS. Calculated. iC ere os - 18.14 17.46 WS 18.19 Pi Go os Wats. eile 12.59 12.66 12.78 11.93 an Od ae cae Oe 69.27 ° 66.89 69.47 69.88 These resuits show a somewhat wide variation from those calculated. This probably arises from the fact that the fractions were not composed of the crystals of a single kind of oxalate, but had other oxalates mixed with them in small amounts. Examined under a magnifying olass they seemed to be homogeneous, but the different crops could not be distingu’shed from one another. They were all small, hard prismatic crystals, somewhat difh- cultly soluble in water. One set of crystals, the aualy- sis of which is reported under VII in the above table, was ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 9 redissolved in water and recrystallized. On analysis it yielded the following results: WHE; 1ige ember, Gents Sh Aye Se ed ANS 18.14 18.19 oy ss sale aay iia OR PT ae 12.59 12.71 See, aes eee PPE IE eat 69.27 69.10 These were calculated upon a water-free basis. The crystals from the various crops mentioned above did not contain a very constant amount of water, but ranged from 9.13 to 11.06. The calculated amount of water in Zr fe, 3Na,),. 5.0 is 10,62. It would seem, there- fore, that the tendency, when this method of formation is adopted, is toward the formation of crystals containing free oxalicacid and with the sodium and zirconium oxalates bearing a ratio ot three to one. ZIRCONIUM POTASSIUM OXALATE Tie curdy precipitate gotten by precipitating zircon- inm chloride with normai potassium oxalate is iusoluble in an excess of either of the substances. The precipitate first obtained is an impure zirconium hydroxide, contain- ing only small amounts of oxalic acid. The supernatant liquid on concentration yields needle-like crystals of po- tassium oxalate, carrying only traces of zirconium. Af- ter the separation of a good deal of this potassium oxalate, further concentration yielded a gelatinous substance having thecomposition (XII): Zr, 39.34; K, 5.06; C,O,, 43.05; which seems to be a basic zirconium oxalate, mixed or united with a small proportion of potassium oxalate. If the potassium be calculated as potassium oxalate and subtracted, the composition of the remainder would be approximately Zr (OH),. Zr(C,O,).. On adding potassium binoxalate to a solution of zircon- ium chloridea white curdy precipitate was obtained which was not completely soluble in excess of the binoxalate. The somewhat turbid solution was filtered and evapor- .ated. Large crystals resembling those of oxalic acid formed. ‘These were separated, and on analysis proved 10 JOURNAL OF THE to be oxalic acid. At the same time a number of small crystals were formed, which were mechanically separated, washed and dried. ‘These were analyzed and are report- edunder XIII. A further crop was gotten from the mother liquor, and the analysis is given under XIV. XIII. Vie 7 PRG LSS A ian) RON SA 19.59 17.99 BO e ee Ok ts aS 16.18 13.91 GRRE GAR Ne. 2 8 64.23 68.09 The curdy precipitate, which first formed, was also ex- amined and found to have the composition Zr(C,QO,),. 201 OH)... The addition of a solution of potassium tetroxalate to zirconium chloride gave a gelatinous precipitate of zircon- ium oxalate (basic), carrying a little potassium oxalate. Subtracting the potassium oxalate, the percentages (X VI) Zr, 39.09 and C,O,, 38.63 are left, which are not very dif- ferent from the hgures gotten for the precipitate from potassium oxalate (neutral). This curdy gelatinous precipitate was dissolved in ex- cess of tetroxalate and the solution placed over sulphuric acid to crystallize, and yielled crystals having the com- position (X VIL); Gr, 20.85; K,.16.72; and C,O)462.8 bone will be seen, these are not far from the 1:2 zirconium potassium oxalate, with excess of oxalic acid. When potassium hydroxide was added toa solution of zirconium oxalate in oxalic acid until nearly neutral and then set aside for crystallization, various crops of crys- tals were gotten, as inthe case of the double sodium oxa- lates. These crops of crystals were similar in appear- ance to the sodium crystals. They were analyzed and showed fairly constant composition. (Zr(C2O4 )2)e- XVIII. De Boe XX. XXI. (KeC204)9.HeCoOnw. AY. 3 otek. 08 19.25 19,53 18.47 18.95 Beets he A 16.41 16.35 14.84 14.46 16.34 C204. .66.51 64.40 65.33 67.07 64.71 The three previous analyses may also be referred to ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. f | here as having approximately the same composition. See analyses XIII, XIV, XVII. These are calculated as water-{rce. In the analyses XVIII and XIX the per- centages of water were 12.99 and 12.38. These would correspond to the formula (Gr(C,O,)2).(K,C,O,)5. HeC,O,. 8H,O. In thiscase, as in the zirconium oxalates and the sodium oxalates, the crystals seem to form only along with free oxalic acid, giving acid salts. ZIRCONIUM AMMONIUM OXALATES. The addition of a solution of ammonium oxalate to the slightly acid solution of zirconium chloride gave a_ heavy evelatinous precipitate which was soluble in excess of am- mouium oxalate and proved to be zirconium hydroxide with more or less zirconium oxalate and small amounts of ammonia. ‘The filtrate from this precipitate was evap- orated slowly and a fine crystalline powder obtained. This contained (X XII) Zr,42.17 per cent. and C,O,, 39.86 ver cent. This isin fair agreement with Zr,(C,O,),.Zr (OH),. When ammonium oxalate is added until the first gelatinous precipitate is redissolved and then evaporated to crystallization, different crops of crystals can be got- ten containing various amounts of ammonia. These did not seem to have any regular composition in our experi- ments and were looked upon as basic zirconium oxalates with varying. amounts of ammonium oxalate present. Thus for one of these the figures (XVIID Zr, 31.48; NH,, 7.14; and C,O,, 61.38 were gotten. Abandoning this method and using the one adopted in the cases of the sodium and potassium double oxalates, a more favorable result was optained. Zirconium hydroxide was dissolved in excess of oxalic acid and then this was | nearly neutralizel by means of ammonium hydroxide, Analyses of these crops of crystals follow: Zr.(C gO i)o- XXIV. SRV: 2 (NEw sCeOy: CS ee ene ee ae ae a 16.55 16.66 17.58 1 RS ia ee ae 14.46 fy 35 13.28 Fe 2 ne a se 69.99 69.99 (8.94 12 JOURNAL OF THE While these do not show that the crystals had been thoroughly purified, the restlts indicate that the compo- sition is one Zirconium oxalate to two ammonium oxalate. On recrystallizing one of these crops of crystals, zircon- ium hydroxide was observed to separate when the solu- tion was heated (to evaporate to crystallization), and the crystals which were obtained consisted of ammonium ox- alate alone. rs 1 In general it may be stated that the zirconium oxalate fails to show any decided tendency to enter into clearly defined combinations with the alkaline oxalates, exhibit- ing rather a power of crystallizing along with them in mixtures of any proportions, It can be said at best that under the conditions of our experiments certain ratios | seem to be preferred, and appeared more presistently. In all cases the crystals formed from oxalic acid solutions, and this free oxalic acid crystallized with them, giving acid oxalates. THE HALOGEN SALTS OF ZIRCONIUM. F. P. VENABLE AND CHARLES BASKERVILLE. I. DECOMPOSITION OF THE ZIRCONS. It may be well to give in detail the method (Jour. An. and Ap. Chem. 1891.551) as modified by an experience of several years. The zircons are ground in an iron mortar soas to pass a 90 mesh sieve. The proportions used ina fusion are 150 grams zircons, +00 grams sodium hy- droxide 4).grams sodium fluoride. The sodium hydroxide and fluoride are fused in a nickel crucible (400 cc) then heated for fifteen or twenty minutes with the water blast ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 13 The zircons are introduce: in portions of five or six grams. If the temperature is high enough there is a rapid evolution of.bubblesof gas. It must be stirred to prevent foaming over (the stirrer being a strip of nickel fastened toa glass rod.) After the introduction of three-fourths of the zircon the temperature should be increased by adding other lamps as the mass becomes pasty and sluggish to-— wards the close of the reaction, making the escape of bubbles somewhat explosive. The success of the opera- tion depends on the high temperature, especially at the close. With a lower temperature much.will be left un- acted upon. After the introduction of all the zircon the mass should be heated and stirred until no more bubbles escape. This stirring can only be imperfectly carried out towards the close. The mass should then be im- mediately removed by means of a nickel spatula. and the lumpy pieces allowed to cool on crucible tops or sheets of nickel. The crucible should be scraped as clean as pos- sible before cooling. It is best then to quench it with water before the adhering pieces’ of the melted mass cool, and crack the crucible incontracting. A number of cruci- bles crack during the fusion. If they escape this they al- most infallibly crack in the cooling unless cooled down filled to the brim with water. Of course due care must be taken in introducing the water. It can be safe- ly blown in from a distance with a wash bottle. As there is much spitting of melted caustic soda during the fusion the hands should be gloved and the handle of the stirrer ‘should be long enough to secure the face and eyes from danger. Saas Ba The lumps, while still hot, are removed from the nickel sheet and placed in water in acasserole (1 litre capacity). After a few minutes the water becomes muddy on agita- tion. Pour off this water with the suspended particles into a large settling jar. Lefill the casserole, heat to boiling, stir and pour off again, thus removing gradually the finer masses. This is the best way of disintegrating 14 JOURNAL OF THE and washing the mass. The particles settle best from hot water. After a while they settle slowly. It is best to use two or three settling jars, pouring off from the first to the others before a second washing is added from the casserole. Nearly all settles in the first jar and that which settles more slowly may be allow to take its time inthe other jars. After a while the disintegration may be helped by breaking with a glass rod or rubbing with a pestle. Five gr six gallons of water should be used in washing as ‘this removes the sodium silicate and it is far easier and better to get ridof itin this way than to be worried by its presence later on. Of course it is_ not entirely removed and some little of the zirconate is also lost. | ’ After washing the sodium zirconate must be de- composed by the ,addition of hydrochloric acid. Strong acid is used and it is boiled with the zirconate in the casserole used for washing. Usually all dissolves up ex- cepta few grams of undecomposed zircon. It is not necessary to filter the solution. It may be immediately transferred toa large evaporating dish and carried down to dryness, first over the naked flame and then, as silica etc., begin to separate out, on the sandbath. It is neces- sary to watch the temperature of the latter and to stir the mass up occasionally to prevent overheating but a great deal of time may thus be saved. It is usually pos- sible to begin a fusion in the morning and have the hy- drochloric acid solution of it ready for evaporation before the day’s work is over. If the washing was well-done the amount of silica sep- arating is not large. Hydrochloric acid is added to the dried mass, then water and it is filtered. The clear fil- trate is again evaporated to dryness to remove the last traces of silica. We have uniformly adopted this precaution but seldom found any silica separated by the last evap- oration. After this second evaporation and filtration the solution is ready for the separation of the iron. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 15 The larger portion of the iron may be separated by the use of sulphur dioxide. The impure zirconium chloride is made up into a moderately dilute soiution in a large jar. This is nearly neutralized with ammonia and sul- phur dioxide is passed through. The zirconium is pre- cipitated out as a basic sulphite. This is filtered away from the solution containing most of the iron. In most cases it is advisable to dissolve again in hydrochloric acid and precipitate once more with sulphur dioxide. The filtrate containing the iron also contains much of the zir- conium. A good deal of this is precipitated on boiling. The filtrate from this is then evaporated toa small bulk and a good deal of the iron will crystallize out as the dou- ble chloride of iron and ammonium in deep red crystals. The concentrated filtrates from several fusions, thus part- ly freed from iron, may be again treated with sulphur dioxide and the zirconium recovered. The sulphite after draining in large funnels is dissolved in hydrochloric acid and boiled until all sulphur dioxide is driven off. It is then precipitated as hydroxide by means of ammonium hydroxide and well washed. This hydroxide is drained upon filters and dissolved in the least amount of concentrated hydrochloric acid. The remaining impurities are gotton rid of by repeated crystallizations from strong hydrochloric acid. This must be managed with some care as it is quite easy to form an oxychloride insoluble in the strong acid, for in- stance by the addition of strong acid to a somewhat concen- trated aqueous solution. [In evaporating the hydrochloric acid solution to crystallization it is therefore necessary to add concentrated acid from time to time as the watery acid evaporates so that the first crystallization shall be from strong acid. After that there is little trouble in subsequent crystallizations from strong acid. The crys- tallizations are best made from a casserole and one hun- dred grams or more of chloride may be crystallized at atime. Generally twelve or fifteen crystallizations will 16 - JOURNAL OF THE suffice. There will be little loss of zirconium if fust enough acid is used each time to bring the soluble chloride into solution (some little insoluble chloride is nearly al- ways present.) The acid poured off each time from the crystals may be saved and evaporated to recoyer the zir- conium or used in the decomposition of other portions of zircons. ‘II. ZIRCONIUM CHLORIDES. Large number of compounds of zirconium with chlorine . or chlorine and oxygen have been described and these compounds have been the subjéct of much investigation. The object in many cases has been to secure a zirconium chloride of definite composition which would prove a.val- uable compound for determining the atomic weight of the element. ‘Thére are several difficulties in the way of se- curing such a conipound. 1. The tendency to form basic chlorides. 2. The ease with which hydrochloric acid is lost through the action of heat and of dehydrating agents. 3. The presence of free hydrochloric acid. 4, The deliquescent nature of the chlorides. It is particularly desirable that the conditions under which a definite chloride can be formed should be discov- ered, as zirconium seems to yield no very satisfactory compounds for, the determination of the atomic weight. There have been many efforts at finding out these exact conditions. Most text-books state that anhydrous, pure zirconium tetrachloride can be prepared by passing dry chlorine over a mixture of charcoal and zirconia heated toa high temperature. Hermann used this sublimed zirconium chloride for the determination of the atomic weight. As Clarke says, however, little confidence can be placed in his results. Bailey (Chem. News., 60, 17.) has recorded that even with great care to avoid the presence ot moist- ure he was unable to prevent the formation of oxychlo- ’ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 17 rides. Healso says that in no case was it found possible to prepare the chloride free from iron and silica. The necessity for the presence of these in the materials used or in the resuiting compound is not very apparent. We have as yet had no opportunity of repeating his experi- ments. This tetrachloride has also been prepared by passing dry chlorine over zirconium or over zirconia and charcoal. Troost and Hautefeuille [Compt. rend, LX XV., 1889. ] have prepared it by the «ction of silicon chloride upon zirconia. Smith and Harris [Am. Chem. Soc. 1895. 654] succeeded in preparing this same chloride by heating zir- conta with phosphorus pentachloride. The chlorides most commonly worked with, have been those formed by the solution of the hydroxide in hydro- chloric acid, followed by precipitation or crystallization from concentrated hydrochloric acid or from water. Berzelius attempted to remove the excess of hydrochlo- ric acid by heating the salt to 60°C. but was not able to obtain a definite compound. , Two analyses gave Bene oe oS 1 0,332 0.485 Ean aries Shot Ad a 2 ake a4 «2 0.661 1.096 The silver chloride should be about two and one-third times as much as the oxide. Paykull dried the salt between hlter paper and found the composition of the crystals to be ZrOCl,.8H,O. Ac- cording to Melliss (Zeitschr. f. Chem. [2], VI. 196) this salt ‘crystallizes with 43H,O instead of SH,O. The amorphous form is precipitated by pouring the aqueous solution into strong hydrochloric acid. This ts insoluble in boiling concentrated acid but easily soluble in water. Paykull (Ber. VI. 1467) assigns to this the formula 2ZrOC1,.13H,O. Endemann has described basic or oxychlorides Zr,O, Cl,, ZrOC1OH, and Zr,O,C1,(OH),; Troost and Hautefeu- iile have described others, Zr,O,Cl, and Zr,OCI,. In fact water is so easily taken up and hydrochloric acid lost 3 18 . JOURNAL OF THE that a large number of such indefinite compounds might be prepared by slightly varying the conditions. Nylander (Bidrag till kinnedomen om Zirkonjord Inang. Diss. Lund 1864.) madea series of attempts at dehydra- ting thechloride. He prepared the chloride by dissolving the hydroxide in hydrochloric acid and evaporating to crys- tallization. The salt formed white needles, easily soluble in water. They were washed with alcohol and for analy- ses I and II were pressed between filter paper; II and IV were dried over sulphuric acid. The results were as follows: i I. III. IV. Pat Vac tors Sn see DO 25.69 30.11 31.78 “ae re 21.58 21.58 23.06 23.80 Loss(H 2 O).. 50.86 52.78 46.83 44.12 or calculated on a dry basis: Be Dee 56.08 54.41 56.63 57.18 eal, gees 43.02 45.59 43.37 42.82 Again preparations were made as before. I was dried between filter paper, II over sulphuric acid, III was pressed between filter paper and then dried over sulphu- ric acid, IV was dried a long time over sulphuric acid. The analyses gave the following: if Il, III. IV. PER te 28.52 34.91 37.78 35.69 Sb ae 21.93 26.09 25.87 21.74 oss. ccee 49.55 39.10 36.35 42.57 or calculated on a dry basis Bales 56.93 57.23 59.34 62.14 Eee lay os 43.07 42.77 40.66 37.86 Lastly he allowed a solution of the chloride to evaporate | over sulphuric acid washed the crystals obtained with alcohol and pressed them between filter paper. Analyses gave: DA Se padre oe Ee 27.94 28.74 Rete: Cae Dee Cee 27.32 26.67 POSSanlt Se. . FOU See ees 44.74 42.62 or calculated on a dry basis: ——F ound——— Theory. Te, , 80-56 50.04 Tit. eaten 38.50 ) Praeeeiy abe 49,44 49.96 Cha eee 61.50 ELISHA MICHELL, SCIENTIFIC SOCIBTY. 19 Nylander’s description of this salt is correct. Very large handsome crystals can be secured on evaporating an aqueous solution of the chloride prepared by dissolving the hydroxide in hydrochloric acid. If this evaporation is too rapid gelatinous masses separate out, re-dissolving on stirring. There is a considerable loss of hydrochloric acid during this evaporation. The best crystals may be obtained by evaporation over sulphuric acid. These crystals easily dry on porous plates or on filter paper. There is no necessity for the elaborate methods of drying adopted by Nylander. There is however a constant though shght loss of hydrochloric acid. Nylander’s an- alyses (marked I) agree very closely with one made by us. BER Bee as en ee os all oe OED Be (IS REIS» inne nn SEE ALS 8 Boss 0 se ce. soe oo. 48 There is then manifestly a definite compound obtained inthis way. It is unquestionably an oxychloride and the loss (50.46 per cent.) represents both water and combined hydroxyl or oxygen. At ordinary temperatures there is a -ontinuous loss from day to day which makes it impos- sible to get a fixed initial weight. This loss is shown by the following weighings. Date eco) “Oct. 1h. Cet 12.) ? (Oat. 13.9; Wert eeaeeierane. Weighings 1.2806 1.2796 1.2792 1.2787 1.2779 1.2758 By heating to 135°-140° for six hours a large amount of chlorine is driven off and yet not all of the water. ‘The mass leit is insoluble. Heated to 100° under a stream of hydrogen chloride the weight was constant and the loss corresponded to 26.84 per cent. of the original weight. The residue is entirely soluble in water. While these data are not altogether sufficient it will be seen that they correspond fairly accurately with the formula ZrOCl, 8H,O. Five molecules of water are lost at.100° and the compound left is ZrOC1,.3H,O. The first formula is the formula assigned by Paykull and confirms his results as against those of Melliss. The formula gotten by Herr- mann, ZrOCl,.9H,O was manifestly obtained from imper- fectly dried crystals. 20 JOURNAL OF THE Bailey repeatedly crystallized the chloride from hydro- chloric acid, washed it with hydrochloric acid and then removed the free acid. (1) By washing with a mixture of one part alcohol and ten parts of ether. (2) By gently heating the salt. (3) By exposing the finely divided salt at ordinary tem-. peratures in a vacuous desiccator over potash until no hydrochloric acid appeared when air was passed over it. The analysis was performed by dissolving the salt in water and precipitating the zirconia with ammonia, then acidulating with nitric acid and precipitating the chlorine by means of'silver nitrate. By method (2) a constant and progressive diminution of chlorine was observed. ‘There- fore no analyses were made. [For the other methods he eives the results of the analyses by a statement of the relation of ZrO, to AgCl. ZrOo: AgCl Berzelinsideternination +... ....eeusee les? See 4 SES SEES. tt UR eee «5 che eee pS 2.260 Bailey Se Method! Fi ie tetra... eee eee be 1 2.206 4 45 we a Wik tae Se Oe ee 1 2.179 am ‘ os a te aa’ id ke aa 1 2.226 Ae AES te TER EP ME oy BLE ot - 2.260 : } Se AED ve SEA PRINS oe a) St 1 2.264 ” without washing...... 1 2.245 i ee oe a ee ee j 2.309 Clb Mate baie ihe REL ded ee AM oon = TP TR 1 2.285 PR gy cto eae le ke ee bb ee ae Il 2.350° In all of these the drying has gone too far and some of the chlorine has been lost or the crystals still retained hygroscopic spa SG This salt, as will be seen later on, is not cae but ZrOC]1,.3H,O and the true ratio is Ao RoC: 12.327. Hermann pies Dict., 5, 1080.) states that the hydra- ted chloride, gotten in crystals on evaporating its aqueous solution, becomes opaque at 50° C., giving off part of the water and half of the hydrochloric acid and leaving a basic chloride or oxychloride, ZrCl,.ZrOQ,.18H,O or ZrOC1,.9H, O. ‘The same compound is obtained in stellate groups of ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. Dib white silky prisms on evaporating a solution of the chlo- ride. These crystals when heated become white and turbid and are converte into the anhydrous dioxychloride, ZrCl,.2ZrO,. Linnemann(Chem. News., UII, 224.)maintains that crys- tallization from hydrochloric acid (sp. gr. 1.17) and treat- ment with alcohol and ether gives a fine, crystalline, snow white, silky body, leaving hfty per cent. of its weight on ignition and therefore very nearly pure ZrCl, which should leave 52.5 per cent. He claims that this is ‘‘chiefly a neutral, not a basic compound.”’ Our own experiments on the dehydration of the salt obtained by crystallization from water extended over two years, as opportunity was afforded. Several series of ex- periments were undertaken, some along the linesattempted by others, and others by methods not tried before. In all the purified chloride obtained by repeated crystalliza- tion from hydrochloric acid was used, the salt being still wet with the excess of the acid. There was no attempt at drying this between filter paper. In the first experiment this chloride was washed once with water and then put in a desiccator and dried over calcium chloride (porous desiccated). It remained in the desiccator about seven months. Even after this lapse of time it still continued to show a slight loss in weight. It yielded on analysis 48.84 per cent. ZrQO,. Another portion was placed in a jar over solid lumps of sodium hydroxide. After six weeks the loss was very slight. Careful ignition left a residue of ZrO, equivalent to 42.99 per cent. of the original weight. There was found to be 24.44 per cent. of chlorine present. Again a portion was placed over calcium chloride and dry air was drawn over it at the rate of about fifty liters in the twenty-four hours for six months. After the first two months it was examined weekly by the interposition of a flask containing silver nitrate to see whether hydro- chloric acid was still coming off. -Even after the lapse ae JOURNAL OF THE of so long a time as this it was found that the loss of hy- drochloric acid continued, although it was slight. On analysis this gave ZrO, 42.28 per cent., and Cl 24.35 per cent. Although the results in this and the experiment immediately preceding correspond fairly well, they are unsatisfactory as they point either to a mixture of chlo- rides or an oxychloride of very complicated formula and hence unsuited for the ultimate aim of the research. Lastly a portion was placed over concentrated sulphuric acid and the atmosphere above it exhausted occasionally. This was kept up during two months of summer weather: The loss in the last fifteen days was about 0.02 per cent. of the whole. The mass was powdery with a slightly discolored crust. It was all soluble in water, however, and yielded a clear colorless solution. It contained 53.30 per cent. of ZrO,. This corresponds very nearly to the formula ZrOCl,.3H,O. This last experiment showed the possibility of securing pure zirconium chloride, provided the excess of lhydro- chloric acid could be removed. It was thought that this might be done by heating in an atmosphere of hydro- chloric acid. A weighed flask was so arranged that it could be kept at a definite temperature while a stream of dry hydrogen chloride was passing through it. The temperature ranged from 100° to 110° C., and the chloride placed in the flask melted, solidifying again after the loss of the water and excess of hydrochloric acid. If the dry- ine was done slowly enough, apparently crystalline oxy- chloride was gotten whick lost no further weight on being kept at 100°C. A more rapid drying left a hard white mass quite hygroscopic. Heating this mass for several days did not cause any diminution in weight, pro- vided the flask was kept full of hydrogen chloride. If the mass was heated even a short time in the absence of hvdrogven chloride then further heating caused a continu- ous loss of weight even in the presence of a rapid stream of hydrogen chloride. After this it was impossible to Secure a constant weight. -—=-_— 7. <1" ""” — ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 23 This method of drying has becn tried repeatedly on various preparations and I regard the facts stated above as showing conclusively that a neutral zirconium chloride can be prepared and dried. Analyses of this chloride gave the following percent- ages of ZrO. ~ tn * 2.10 Bh 52:63 Believing that a simple compound of zirconium and chlorine had been obtained corresponding to the formula ZrCl, a series of determinations were undertaken with a view to securing data for calculating the atomic weight. This chloride obtained by recrystallization from con- centrated hydrochloric acid had also been analyzed by Linnemann (Lond. Chem. News LII, 233-240) and the percentage of zirconium found led him to believe that it was the tetrachloride. The determinations made by one of us with a view to securing data for recalculating the atomic weight were ten in number. They were made with great care and yielded a mean of 52.986. This would have corresponded to an atomic weight of 91.75 if the body were really the tetrachloride. To settle its exact composition the chlorine was determined in a sample dried also in hydrogen chloride. Two determinations gave the mean percentage of chlorine as 35.26. This result is entirely too low for the tetrachloride which would require 61.01 per cent. of chlorine. The substance anal- yzed was then manifestly an oxychloride but none of sim- ple composition could be calculated from the results. The formula which seemed nearest to it was Zr,(OH), Cl,.5H,O. (see J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1895. p. 842). The subject was then allowed to drop for two years, except that the chloride was tested for water and found to give : 3 it off abundantly at 180°—210°. During the past summer the accuracy of the chlorine determination was brought into question. Determinations ~ were made on other samples and the percentage of chlorine was found to be 29.98. ‘The error af the previous deter- 24 JOURNAI, OF THE mination may have been due to the sample or to manipu- — ~ jJation. Which was at fault cannot well be decided now. The new determinations give Calc. for ZrOCl,.3H,O. Zr. 38.99 39.12 Cl. 29.98 30.66 This oxychloride is therefore, after drying, identical with the one obtained by crystallization from water after it also has been dried. The amorphous (7) form, insoluble in concentrated hy- drocloric acid but easily soluble in water has been anal- yzed by Paykull and he has calculated the formula 27rOC1,.13H,O. This insoluble oxychloride is nearly always present during the process of purification by re- crystallization from hydrochloric acid. Repeated boilings with hydrochloric acid fail to dissolve it. A sample was prepared by allowing a very concentrated aqueous solu- tion of the oxychloride to fall drop by drop into concen- trated hydrochloric acid. It was washed with hydro- chloric acid and then boiled. After pouring off the acid the mass was washed with a mixture of nine parts ether and one part alcohol. It was dried between filter paper. Little assurance could be felt that this mode of drying removed all the hygroscopic moisture. It was analyzed in this condition. Another portion was placed over caustic alkali (after pressing between filter paper) and yet another portion was dried at 105° in a stream of hydrogen chloride. The analysis of the portion dried between filter paper was as follows: (no difference was observed in that over caustic alkali after two days). Cale. for ZrOCl»s.6H9O. Zr. 31072 31.70 Cl. 20.81 21.01 This is therefore in close accord with the formula ZrOCl,.6H,O. The portion dried under hydrogen cilo- ride was small and only the zirconium was determined. The percentage of this corresponded fairly with ZrOCl,. 3H,O. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. pas Summarizing our examination of these oxychlorides then, we find that there are three. 1. An oxychloride gotten in large, well-formed crystals by crystallization from water. These crystals lose slowly both water and hydrochloric acid on exposure to the air. Their formula is ZrOC1,.8H,O. 2. An oxychloride gotten by precipitation by hydro- chloric acid from an aqueous solution. This is insoluble in hydrochloric acid. It is seen in silky crystals or a white mass of very fine crystals. The formula is ZrOCl,.6H,O. 3. An exychloride gotten by crystallization from hy- drochloric acid. This has the formula ZrOCl1,.3H,O. When any one of these is dried at 100—125° with a stream of dry hydrogen chloride passing over it three molecules of water of crystallization are left and the oxy- chloride has the formula given under 3. namely ZrOCl.. 3H,O. These last molecules of water are lost at a tem- perature of 180—210°. Weibull (Ber. 1887. 1394) gives the measurements of the crystals of the oxychloride formed from water. They belong to the tetragonal system, are optically unaxial with double refraction. Several times during the examination of these oxychlo- rides the formation of a hvdrogele was observed. ‘The exact conditions under which it was formed were not de- termined. ‘The tendency to form this hydrogele is much less than in the case of the bromides and iodides. Similar compounds will be mentioned there. III. ZIRCONIUM BROMIDES. Zirconium tetrabromide, ZrBr,, is formed by conducting bromine vapor over a heated mixture of zirconium and carbon. A stream of carbon dioxide may be used tor carrying the bromine vapor. It forms a white crystalline (microscopic) powder which can be sublimed but is de- composed by water, (Melliss J. 1870. 328:). Zirconium oxybromide may be formed*by decomposing 26 JOURNAL OF THE the tetrabromide with water and also by dissolving zirco- nium hydroxide in hydrobromic acid (Gmelin, Handbook, 6th ed’n. Il. 1. 7060.) It crystallizes from the aqueous solution in fine transparent needle like crystals contain- ine water of crystallization (Melliss, Mats Weibull B. 1887. 1394). Weibull gives the following analyses: Calc. ZrOBrg.8H2O Zr 20.35 20.83 21.87 Br 41.16 38.70 39.05 He says that the crystals are isomorphous with those of the oxychloride which seems to be true. They are much more hygroscopic. His two analyses are decidedly discordant and one would judge that the amount of water of crystallization had been decided upon from the analogy to the oxvchloride. The oxy-bromides described in the following experi- sents belong to two types with varying degrees of hy- dration—ZrOBr, plus x H,O. where x equais 3, 13, or 14 and ZrBr(OH), plus yH,O where y equals 1 or 2. All of these compounds are deliquescent and decompose on ex- posure to moist air, the clear white crystals, often col- ored pink by free bromine present, melting to a eum, frequently with the evolution of hydrobromic acid. ‘The salts are unstable even in dry air as was found on expos- ine dried crystals upon a watcheglass in a desiccator con- taining suiphuric acid. Much hydrobromic acid was evolved in the decomposition. The crystals were prepared in two ways:—either by dissolving pure Zr(OH), in dilute hydrobromic acid evap- orated upon water bath with subsequent additions of 48 per cent. hydrobromic acid and repeated evaporations, or a concentrated solution of hydrobromic acid was saturated with Z1(OH),, evaporated and the crystals obtained on cooling. As a rule the crystals obtained were quite soluble in the hot acid but separate at once on cooling. In the heating necessary tor the thorough saturation of the hy- =—s— ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. o7 drobromic acid by the Zr(OH), the solution first becomes straw colored then a deeper red depending upon the time of the heating. This is evidently due to bromine from the decomposition of some hydrobromic acid by organic matter in the air. A difficult problem was the removal of the strong hy- drobromic acid mother liquor and the free bromine nearly always present with the crystals. Of the methods tried to effect this none proved satisfactory. The crystalline mass wads in one case six times washed with ether, the yellowish red solution, due to dissolved bromine, being decanted. Filtering proved too slow permitting a rather lone exposure of the crystals to the moisture of the air. After this washing with ether the crystals still slightly yellow colored were placed ina ‘‘vacuum’”’ desiccator for the removal of the remaining ether. ‘I‘he small @lass dish containing the material was allowed to remain 36 hours in the vacuum desiccator. The substance was then re- moved, dried between filter paper and analyzed. Found Calc. for ZrOBrg.13H 20 ZrO 2 24.15 24.50 24 GORA Nettie ¢ so4.0! Br ee eet aN Sis eee we ee tives Sted 2 31,93 HO 124°C 24.44 This substance gave evidence of decomposition after being placed in the weighing bottle. Another method used for the removal of bromine was washing the colored crystals three times with strone (48 per cent.) solution of hydrobromic acid. Most of the bromine was thus removed, although the salt remained. shghtly vellow, possibly due to the remaining hydrobro- mic acid. An interruption of the work at this point re- quired the salt in this state tobe placea in a desiccator over sulphuric acid. [It remained there for sevéral days when the werk was resumed. AIl moisture seemed to be removed and great volumes of hydrobromic acid were given off when the desiccator was opened. The sub- stance had taken on a browuish-red color around the edges 28 JOURNAI, OF THE but the central portion was perfectly white. To remove the excess of acid the substance was washed quickly three times with small amounts of water. 1 Read at the Washington Meeting American Chem, Society. af Prakt. CHEM... 31, 77 38 JOURNAL OF THE some of the experiments he also precipitated the zirconium hydroxide by means of ammonium hydroxide and deter- mined the sulphuric acid in the filtrate by precipitation with barium chloride. Mats Weibull also used the sulphate and reports seven experiments with an entire consumption of 8.2335 grams. Bailey’s own determinations number eight, using in all more than sixteen grams. He gives full data as to his work, and it is well done and merits verv careful atten- tion. The following table is copied from his article.’ The figures have been recalculated to the basis of O=16. Mean Maximum Minimum Ar Cl 88.77 Sea Ligh Hermann ZrO, : HCl 90.14 90.98 89.29 Hermann KoZrFs : KeSO, 90.53 92.80 90.06 Marignac ZrOs.: Ke SOx 90.64 91.26: 90.24 Marignac KoZrFs : ZrOg 90.8 91.3 89.9 Marignac Zr(SO4)o : ZrO 89.45 92.65 89.27 Berzelius Z1(SO4)2 : ZrOo 89.48 90.38 89,13 Mats Weibull Zr(SO4)9 : ZrOg 90.65 90.78 90.46 Bailey It is manifest that the determinations based upon the ignition of the suiphate are the only ones worthy of fur- ther attention. A brief criticism of these is necessary. First, as to Mats Weibull, Bailey says that the tempera- ture used by him in freeing the sulphate from the excess of sulphuric acid was some 50° too low. This would of course give him variable and low results. Berzelius does not give exact data as to temperature used, but he seems to have heated the sulphate too high in driving off the excess of acid. Possibly more stress is to be laid upon the question of the purity of his sulphate and the correct- ness of the assumption that he had in hand the normal ‘ sulphate. Bailey concludes from his experiments that the sulphate is stable up to 400° C., and that the excess of sulpnuric acid can be completely driven off by the use of a temper- 3Chem,. News, 60, 17. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 39 ature between this and 350° C. He further states that a mixture of the salt and free acid, as prepared by him, when heated to this temperature until constant, yields the normal sulphate. It must be said that he gives no proofs of this bevond the amount of zirconia found in his atomic weight determinations. Whilst certain criticisms of the work of Bailey have occurred to me, I will refrain from mentioning them until I have had opportunity to repeat his experiments and so make myself more familiar with the details of his method. One criticism I can venture upon now, however. I doubt whether it is possible to ignite, without loss, zir- conia along with ammonium carbonate, as was done by Berzelius and by Bailey to remove the “‘last two or three milligrams of sulphuric acid.”’ I have not ventured to use this method in getting rid of the chlorine which is held just as tenaciously as the sulphuric acid. as I feel sure that it could net be done without loss. Bailey adopted extraordinary precautions to prevent this loss, but it seems to me that it is not the currents of the exter- nal atmosphere, as he maintains, which are to be most avoided, but the mass of escaping vapor of the ammonium salts. It is easily possible for him to have lost several milligrams of the finely-divided zirconia in this way, and as he states, each milligram was equivalent to a variation of 0.25 in the atomic weight. THE WEIGHINGS. In the following experiments the amounts of substance used varied from one to five grams. To avoid the disad- vantage of a small error causing a large variation in the result, I would gladly have used larger amounts of the chloride, but many difficulties met me there. The puri- fication of the zirconium oxychloride is slow and costly. It is best carried out in small portions of a few grams at a time. Some fifty grams have constituted the stock at my 40 JOURNAL OF THE command. The drying of large portions and the subse- quent ignition would be exceedingly tedious and time con- suming, besides requiring such apparatus as could not be well afforded. Five or six grams have been about the largest amounts that could be well handled at one time. Even such an amount as that required from sixteen to twenty days for the completion of the experiment. It could not safely be hurried through in shorter time. The weighings were carried but upon an excellently ~ constructed Sartorius balance, intended for a load of 200 grams. The heaviest apparatus used weighed less than sixty grams. ‘The weights were corrected by one which had been compared with the standard at Washington. All objects were weighed against a tare of as nearly the same size, form. and weight as possible, all of the flasks, crucibles, etc., being made in pairs. This partly avoided the necessity for a reduction of the weighings toa vacuum and corrections for moisture, pressure, etc. Such ¢or rections would have kad little meaning in comparison with the other inaccuracies of the process and manipulation, and could only serve to give a false appearance of excess- ive accuracy. The objects were left one-half hour in the balance-case before weighing, experiments having shown that this time was sufficient. Of course the adjustment of the balance was carefully watched, and the balance, which has been used very little, was put to no other use during the progress of these experiments. METHOD OF WORK. The purified oxychloride was introduced into a small olass flask having a capacity of 100cc. This was provided with a glass stopper ground to fit, and aiso a second one with two tubes arranged for the passage of the hydro- chloric acid gas. The arrangement of the tubes was similar to that in an ordinary ether wash-bottle, though both tubes outside were bent downwards and had little ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 41 bulbs blown in them for catching moisture, etc. t Age” 90.61 The atomic weight as determined by Bailey is 90.65. The mean valne given in Clarke’s Recalculation is 90.40. I purpose repeating the determinations with the oxychlo- ride, with such modifications as have occurred to me since the completion of the above work. 2 NOTES ON DARBYA AND BUCKLEYA. (a 4 W. W. ASHE. The limited and localized distribution of Darbya and Buckleyva, two genera of southern Appalachian plants (Darbya a monotypic genus and ABuck/eya with one Jap- anese species and the east American plant which is uuder consideration) has frequently since their discovery been a subject of comment among American botanists. Among the chief factors which have limited their distribution, as Professor Sargent’ has pointed out in the case of Auck- feya, are the tact that the sexes are confined to diff-rent plants, and the rapid degeneration of the oily albumen surrounding the embryo: the first being an obstacle to the formation of seed; and the latter injuring or destroying the germinating powers of the seed unless they early reach a suitable place for sprouting. Both thus check the increase of new plants. Another fact which has apparently been overlooked in connection with these plants and which is probably also in a large measure accountabie for their localized distri- bution, is that no efficient means is provided for seed-dis- semination. ) ®Eitude embryogéniqute sur les Sélaciens. Arch. de Zool. exp. et gen 1893. 60 JOURNAL OF THE ing. In the teleost forms studied by Mitrophanow (spe- cies not stated) the anlage develops in same way as in Serranus—as a furrow. The salmon egg is very different from that of Serranus. It is large, and with relatively firm yolk. At my sug- gestion Mr. J. E. Mattocks undertook the problem of ascertaining in the first place, whether the common anlage existed in the salmon embryo, and if so, what was its character. The result of Mr. Mattocks’s work (pub- lished in Anat. Anzeiger XIII Bd. Nr. 24), was to show that the common anlage does exist in the salmon; that it is not a furrow, as in Serranus, but a thickened stripe of ectoderm as in selachians; that it divides into three parts, the middle becoming the auditory sac, the posterior the rudiment of the lateral line, and the anterior remaining as a very noticeable thickening situated above the anterior gill clefts. It thus turns out, as might have been ex- pected, that the peculiarly distinct, furrow-like character of the analge in Serranus, is not universal in teleosts. The difference in the character of the anlage between Serranus and Salmo is perhaps associated with the dif- ference in the character of the two eggs. One is small, light, the embryo cosisting of comparatively few cells, the other large, heavy, the embryo relatively massive and of many cells. Without dwelling on this point (which like other similar questions can be cleared up only by an extensive comparative study of closely related forms, aided, where the method is practicable, by intelligently put” experiments—in this connection see Davenport’s very suggestive ‘‘Catalogue of the processes concerned in Ontogeny.’ Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Vol. XXVII. No. 6), it is safe to say that comparative embryology lends some support to the generalization that in embryos of the former type invagination or evagination is apt to occur, while in embryos of the latter type the invagina- tion or evagination is frequently represented by solid in- ee ELISHA MIECHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 61 growths or ontgrowths (1. e. thickenings)—compare for instance the formation of the mesoblast of Amphioxus with that of other vertebrates, the invaginate gastrula of Leucifer with tie cor Sata stage of such a form as the lobster. If we suppose (as a basis for further work. rather than for any other purpose) that the common lateral an- lage in the ichthyopsidan embryo indicates the presence in the chordate ancestors of a single elongate sense-organ on each side of the hean, then what was the character of this organ? Was it a sac (groove), or merely a superfi- cial sensory area? It is worth while often. to put the question, even if the answer is not forthcoming. Cer- tainly the answer is not now at hand. Though merely putting the qnestion calls to mind the cephalic slits of nemerteans, and Hubrechi’s ingenious, if not very pop- ular theory of chordate ancestry. NOTES ON NORTH CAROLINA MINERALS.* PY J. HB. : PRALFTL. CONTENTS. PAGE. eee I NOT M BB AT Sok i ee ce eee lab hae enon es 62 IDET BAP LTS SEA WEI 6788 oS Oe Pe SAYA LS oad devine Od i tkhdae tie Cree 70 Nh LR ie ee Ly sisid ob pide dia hegdath es 72 INNES, oe ee eee SE So oct wie oe dos gis bine De ars 73 en ie ee eee dh gine ches Conte ee oe 75 EEE MIRON EIT Ic) ele i elec fee dake vee ee dee ae 76 PNM eo iat handy Le Wd e ahead » Gow shady ped Geen wee 79 I I TE aed calc ced jelaca vs ive ta dnssae owabeee nee 80 i ak. ec Kd ck wees bee 220 hing Patan oe ee 82 INTRODUCTORY NOTE. The contents of this paper are notes on the North Car- olina minerals that have been collected during the past few years. Some of these have already been published *By permission of the Director of the N. C. Geological Survey. 4 62 JOURNAL OF THE during the past year, ana reference is made to this under the head of these minerals. These notes are intended primarily for a Bulletin on the Mineral Resources of North Carolina, but the more important of these are published as occasion offers. WELLSITE, A NEW MINERAL.” Occurence.—This mineral occurs at the Buck Creek (Cullakanee) corundum mine in Clay Co., North Carolina, and was collected by Professor S. L. Penfield and the author during the summer of 1892 while engaged in work on the North Carolina Geological Survey. The corundum vein in which the mineral is found is composed chiefly of albite feldspar and hornblende, and penetrates a peridotite rock, dunite, near its contact with the gneiss. The peridotite outcrop is one of the largest in the State and has been thoroughly prospected for cor- undum. ELISHA MITCHELL, SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 63 tating closely a simple combination of a prism of one order aud a pyramid of the other in the tetragonal system. The apparent prismatic faces are formed for the most part by the pinacoid faces, 4, but the crystals interpenetrate each other somewhat irregularly so that portions of the base c, 001, coincide with 4, fg. 1. The lines of twinning on the pinacoid faces between 4 and / twinned are generally regular, while those between 4 and cand also those which cross the prism faces vz, 110 (the apparent pyramid) are generally quite irregular. The 0 faces do not show the striations parallel to the edges 6 and a. which, meeting along the twining lines, often reveal the complex nature of such crystals, nor were any reéntrant angles observed parallel to the edges of the apparent prism as are common on phillipsite and harmotome. Fig. 2 represents another habit of the crystals where m, 110 is wanting and a, 100 is in combination with 6, O10. The method of twinning ts similar to that already described, but the crystals being terminated by a, 100 instead of wz, 110 show prominent reéntrant angles at their ends. These crystals are very similar to those of _-harmotome from Bowling near Dumbarton on the Clyde, ie ee a Bs 5 8 le Cll Ps described by Lacroix.* The only forms that were observed were a, 100; 6, 010; ¢, 001 and mw, 110, with e, 011 only as twinning plane. ‘The faces of the crystals are somewhat rousded and *Bull. de la Soc. Min. de France, No. 4, p. 94, 1885, 64 JOURNAL OF THE vicinal so that the reflections were not very perfect. The angle of the apparent prism J/Ad twinned is approx- imately 90°. Also the angle mAm over the twinning plane 011 could be measured only appreximately, varying from 0°49 to 1°25. The approximate angles are given below, and from those marked with an asterisk the fol- lowing axial ratio was calculated: @ :b:¢ = "768 21: 1°245; B=53°27’ =001A100 Measured Calculated. bAb, 010A010 *90° (Cover twinning plane) ada, 1OOALO0 *73°O (over twinning plane) bam, 010A110 *58°19' cho, 001A100:, 53°27 =p cam, 001A110 60°, 59°45', 59°57’ 59°sa Physical properties.—The crystals are brittle and show no apparent cleavage. The luster is vitreous. Many of the crystals are colorless and transparent while others are white. The hardness is cetween 4 and 4°5. The specific gravity taken on a number of separate cry- stals, by means of the heavy solution, varied between 2:278 and 2°366. This variation was probably due to the difference in the ratio of the barium to the calcium in the different crystals. A section parallel to the pinacoid faces 6, 010, the apparent prism, 1e- .ealed in polarized hght the struct- ure shown in hg. 3. The parts I and I extinguish simultaneously, as also I] and II; while portions III, which are parallel to the basal plane, show parallel extinction. The section showed something of a zonal structure, so that the extinct- ion could only be measured approxi- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 65 mately, Using the Bertrand ocular, this was found to be 33° frem one pinacoid on to the other over the twinning plane. The axis a makes an angle of 52° with the verti- cal axis C in the obtuse angle B. The double refractien is positive and weak. The acute bisectrix ¢ is at right angles to the pinacoid 010, and the divergence of the optical axes is large. 214 probably varies from 120° to 130°, but this could not be measured directly. Chemical analysis.—The mineral was purified for analysis by means of the heavy solution and that which was used varied in specific gravity from 2°278 to 2°360. The analyses were made by Mr. H. W. Foote,** who describes the methods used as follows: ‘Water was determined by loss on ignition, and silica and alumina by the ordinary methods after fusion with sodium carbonate. The filtrate from the alumina pre- cipitation was evaporated with aqua regia to remove the large excess of ammonium salts and a small amount of ammonium chloride was again added. Calcium, barium and strontium were then precipitated together, with a considerable excess of ammonia and ammonium carbo- nate, and magnesia was determined in the filtrate. The mixed carbonates were dissolved in’ kydrochloric acid evaporated to dryness and taken up in about 300°° of wa- ter. The method used for separating barium was that recommended by Fresenius.* To the hot solution, a few drops of acetic acid were added and 10°° of a 10 per cent solution of ammonium chromate containing a_ small amount of dichromate. After standing until the solu- tion became cold, the clear liquid was decanted and the precipitate of barium chromate was washed with a weak chromate solution and with water. The precipitate was *Zs. Anal. Chem., xxix. 426. **Of the Chemical Laboratory of the Sheffield Scientific School, New Haven, Conn. 66 JOURNAL OF THE dissolved in 2°° of pure dilute nitric acid, which was then partly neutralized with ammonia. Ammonium acetate was added and 10° cf chromate solution as before, and after standing, the precipitate was filtered on a Gooch crucible and weighed as BaCrQ,. ‘The filtrate trom the barium precipitation was con- centrated somewhat, and calcium and the small quantity. of strontium precipitated as before. They were ignited and weighed as oxide. Strontium was then separated by treatment with amyl alcohol and determined as sul- phate. Tahe alkalies were determined bya Smith fusion 1 in the ordinary way. The results of the analyses are as follows: I. i; Average. Ratio. 53 8 SOBRE gh 04 44°11 43°86 i fok — 3°00 AS ie os ee 24°89 24°96 W44 ea 6 aa |. oh bo tbe 4 i FAR VE Be » AG nas ASB 1.180 F298!" -O1 41 1 @ eae oe 2 a 5°84 21 5380 "10 Fe) ge MgO . 0-61 062 60:62 “015 (i440 ae ie Reale eee 3°40 3°40 ‘030 | ie ee 1°80 1°80 029 | (Fi © aerate: 96,9 13,39 4) dagas *742 = 3.04 100°01 The ratio of SiO,: Al,O,: RO: H,O is very close to 3.:1:1:3, which gives the formula R”’A1,Si,0,,.. 3H,0% The ratio of BaO : CaO : K,O+Na,O in the above analy- ses is nearly 1:3:2 and the theoretical composition cal- culated fer this ratio is given below together with the analysis after substituting for Na,O its equivalent of K,O and for MgO and SrO their equivalents respectively of CaO and BaO and then recalculating to 100 per cent. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 67 Theory for R’A1,Si,O,, . 3H,O where R is +Ba, 32Ca, 2K. aki iiek 4 ABW 42°87 Bihiks ligt.) 94; 54 24:27 Eek) Ca ierts Bak O65 6°62 CaO a el oat VOLO FEF BO a uta). oy SOB 6°10 ae eee A 3-10 12°87 100.00 100°00 Experiments were made to determine at what temper- atures the water was driven off, and the results are given in the following table, the mineral being heated in each case until the weight became constant. The last trace of water could only be driven off by heating the mineral over the blast lamp. Loss. Pee ee Re Priinething. ‘OS eR SRE A IES Aarts Pere | 1°93 } Whe bs Ao as 1°48 } 4°33 200 Bhi Ole ace LAA ht 300 1 260 LENE UP be eg ee et Oe! Eee ee fe sm peer alt Si EE ere a WY ea MSN neat ei teh. ph ta one 14) 4°9G5) 5.99 Raper ae WAM oo vn a}. fag Sart. 28 ta IDS Sg Ti ie tre Se FP Ze As 18 seen from the above, about one-third of the wa- ter, or one molecule, is given off between 100° and 200°, anether third approximately between 200° and 300°, while the remainder is expelled only at an intense heat. This would indicate that the water exists in three differ- ent conditions in the molecule. If only that which is expelled below 200° be regarded as water of crystalliza- tion, the composition would be H,R’ Al, S1,O0,,+ 4,0. That the new mineral would be closely related to the 68 JOURNAL OF THE phillipsite group of the zeolites, was expected from the first on account of its crystalline form, and this relation is very satisfactorily brought out by a comparison of the crystallographic properties and chemical composition. They all have very nearly the same axial ratios: 0 OG as Wellsite....°768 T 23485) p55" ae Philhipsite :*70949: > BET" 2563 °: P= 535aF Harmotome.*70315 °: : 7°2310 =p=55 10 Stiblite .... °76227 :1:1°19401 B=50 493 In their habit and method of twinning, they are also very similar, all the crystals being uniformly penetration twins. This is especially noticeable between the new mineral and phillipsite and harmotome which are common as dowble twins with c, 001 and e, O11 as twinning planes. The place of the mineral in the phillipsite group is clearly shown by a comparison of their chemical compo- sitions. Arranged in order of their proportions of silica and water to the bases, we have the following interest- ing series, in which R represents the bivalent elements: Wellsite........RAIS1,0,,.3H,O Phillipsite......RAI,Si,O0,,.43H,O Harmotonmre..... RAT S07 55.0 Stilbite ......... RA1Si,0,,.6H,O The ratioof RO:AI,O, is constant, 1:1, in the series, while the proportions of silica and water have a constant ratio, 1:1, between themselves, except in the case of phillipsite. As there is, however, considerable variation in the analy- ses of phillipsite, it is not improbable that the ratio of S10,:H.O, given as 4:45, should be in some cases at least, 4:4, The minerals then form a gradual series, increas- ing in the proportions of SiO, and H,O from wellsite to stilbite. Fresenius® has shown that this group of minerals may be regarded as a series in which the ratio of RO:A1,O, is #75, Kr., III, 42, 1878, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 69 constant, 1:1, while the silica and water vary between certain limits. He has assumed as these two limits: RAI,Si,O,,+6H,O and R, Al,Si,O,,+6H,O The first would be a hydrated calcium albite and the last a hydrated anorthite. From a comparison of the wellsite-stilbite series, 1t seems more probable that the anorthite end would be RAI,Si,O,+2H.0, or doubling this for better comparison with the formula of Fresenius, R,A1LS1,0,,+4H,0O. It is not unreasonable to expect that the first or anor- thite member of this series may be found in nature and the completed series would then be: Anorthite limit... RAI,Si,0O,+2H,O (not yet identified) Wellsite.........RAI,Si,0,,+3H,O Paulipsite .......- RAIS1,0,,+43H,0 (perhaps 4H,0) Harmotome ......RAI,Si,O,,-+5H,O Siilbite ....++....-RAI,Si,O,,+6H,O It is also interesting to note that the formula of the new mineral wellsite is the same as that assigned to edingtonite, but the latter is essentially a barium mineral and being tetragonal shows no crystallographic relations to wellsite. Pyrognostlics.—When heated vefore the blowpipe, the mineral exfoliates slightly and fuses at 2°5-3 to a white bead, coloring the flame slightly yellow. In the closed tube, water is given off at a low temperature. It is very readily decomposed by hot hydrochloric acid with the separation of silica, but without gelatinization. When the water in the mineral is driven off below 265° C., it is nearly all regained on exposing the mineral to the air. If the water, however, is driven off at a red heat, none is regained by the mineral. Name.—The name Wedls¢te is given to this mineral in honor of Professor H. L. Wells of the Sheffield Scientific School, Yale University. 70 JOURNAL OF THE CHABAZITE. Occurrence.—As described on page62, this mineral is intimately associated with the wellsite, at the Buck Creek (Cullakanee) corundum mine in Clay Co., occurring as a mass of small crvstals coating the feldspar, horn- blende and corundum. ‘Thus far this mineral has been found only at the large open cut on the eastside of Buck Creek, just northwest of the shaft. The crystals are transparent to white and very small, no crystal being found that measured over one millimeter in diameter. | The only form observed on any of these,crystals was the unit rhombohedron, 1011, which occurs as simple crystals and also as penetration-twins, with c, as the twinning axis. . Chemical analysis.—In obtaining material for analysis, the crystals of the chabazite and wellsite, freed as far as practicable from the feldspar and hornbleude were crushed and sifted toa uniform grain. By means of the heavy solution, the chabazite was separated from the wellsite and also from any feldspar or hornblende that may have been attached to them. All of the chabazite Hoated, when the specific gravity of the solution was 2./- 278, while the weillsite and heavier minerals sank to the bottom of the separatory funnel. These were drawn off and the solution diluted toa specific gravity of 2.244, but only a small per cent. of the mineral sank. This being drawn off, the solution was further diluted to a specific -gravity of 2.203, when nearly half of the remaining min- eral sank. This was removed and saved for analysis, (II, below) and the solution again diluted. When the specific gravity had been lowered to 2.147, all, but a small amount of the mineral came dawn, and this was saved for anatysis. (1) “Oe comet ee Mie Ce rag) aes "838 | | SB RRR ES 99°62 In the above analysis the ratio of the bivalent oxides to silicia is close to 1:1, and of ferrous oxide to magnesia and lime is very near to 1:7; this would give the formu- la (MeFe)SiO, with Mg: Fe=7:1. Assuming that the Al,O, and Cr.O, belong to spinel and deducting RO suf- ficient tocombine with them, the analysis, after substitu- ting for CaO its equivalent of MgO and recalculating to ee ee ee ee. a a ee ee ELISHA MITCHELI, SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 79 100 per cent, is given below together with the theoretical composition calculated for this formula. Found Theory for (MgFe)Si0,; Me : Fe=7:1 teh sth. 5735 57°69 Mee) ses 3914 8°65 Brot nite i5'5h 33°66 100°00 1L00°00 The name bronzite is very appropriate to this Webster enstatite, for the luster is of a decided bronze-like char- acter throughout the entire mass and is undoubtedly not of a secondary origin, but is the natural luster of this mineral. A similiar bronzite, showing the same decided bronze-like luster has been found at the Buck Creek, (Cullakanee,) corundum mine in Clay county. HMERALD BERYL. Although the beryl is a very common accessory miner- al, in granite veins, especially those of a pegmatitic charac- ter, it is not common to find the deep emerald vreen va- riety. The earliest report of the emerald in North Car- olina is 1880, by W. IE. Hidden*® who deseribes the oc- currence in Sharpes Township, Alexaader Co. w cere it is found associated with the emerald green hiddenite. The occurence of the emerald in Mitchell Co. has been known since 1886, though but little work has been done to develope the locality and to estimate its economic value. Vhe mineral is found on the divide between Brush and Crabtree Creeks about four miles south of Spruce Pine, post office. The vein carrying the beryl is of a peematitic character consisting chiefly of quartz aud an atbite feldspar, with *Elisha Mitchel Scientific Society. 1880. 80 JOURNAL OF THE tourmaline, garnet and the beryl as accessory minerals. ‘he country rock is a gneiss and biotite schist. The emerald beryl has the characteristic green color of the gem and some of the crystals are transparent. They all have the hexagonal prism well developed, but none were observed that showed any terminations. The crystals vary in size from less than a millimeter up to eight millimeters in diameter. They are found imbedded in the quartz, feldspar and biotite schist, but are for the most part near the contact of the vein with the schist, The most transparent and deepest green crystals ob- served were either entirely surrounded by the schist or close to the contact. Those in the quartz were usually more transparent than those found imbedded in the feld- spar. The color of the crystals varies with their loca- tion in the vein, those nearest the schist being of the em- erald variety, whiie those farther away are pale green or yellow. The yellow or cream colored beryls are very abundant though the vein. The crystals vary considerably in size, from those hardly 2™ in diameter to one that measured sR daca The locality as yet has not been developed sufficiently to demonstrate whether it will warrent its being werked for gems. Both Col. Rorison of Bakersville, and Capt. Isaac English of Spruce Pine report that crystals have been found from which good gems were cut. GRASS GREEN CYANITE.* The mineral to be described occurs on the farm of Tiel Young, near North Toe River. Yancey Co., North Carolina, a few miles from Spruce Pine, Mitcheli Co. Some exceptionally large crystals of a grass-¢reen col- or were obtained by the author during the summer of *Am, J. Sci. Vol. V, 1898, p. 126. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 8i 1896 from Mr. M. Alexander, a jeweler in Asheville. After some difficulty the occurrence was located, during the summer of 1897, and the locality has been thoroughly worked by Geo. L. English & Co. of New York, with the result that many good crystals of the cyanite have been obtained. The mineral occurs in a decomposed mica schist from which the single crystals are easily separated. The crystals are often intergrown and masses of these were obtained as large as one’s two fists. All of the crystals found were of a rich grass-green color and many were quite transparent, . Lhese crystals of a blue and blueish white color, are often transparent but are seldom over a few millimeters wide. i .Phis new occurrence of the cvanite is not only of inter- est on account of the deep green color of the mineral but also on.account of the exceptional size and development of the crystals. “Pale green cyanite has been obtained from a number of localities and it has also been found in the v icinity of the ereen cyanite locality on the farm of Isaac Enelish of Spruce Pine, Mitchell Co., imbedded in an undecomposed mica schist. Another occurrence that is worthy of note is that of Graves Mt., Georgia. At this locality thin small plates of the pale green cyanite are associated with well crystallized rutile. *7,5. Kr., v, 17, 1880. a a a ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 83 ZIRCON. * Some specimens of zircon crystals were obtained of Messrs. Geo L. English & Co., from New Stirling, Tre- dell Co., North Carolina, and on account of their size and development it has been thought a description of them would be of interest. The crystals are all very similar in their habit, in which the unit pyramid is strongly developed while the prisms faces are short, figs. 4and5. Fig. 4 represents the majority of the crystals, where the prism of the first order is only slightly developed, at times being hardly ‘perceptible. Those represented by fig. 5 are similar in their habit to some zircon crystals described by the au- 4. 5. thor from the townships of Dungannon and Faraday, Ontario. t The following forms were observed on these crystals: ee see VAS ee Es tr, 2212 ake, The face x, 311 was only observed on a very few of the crystals and was but slightly developed. The crystals are all well developed with smooth faces, making them well adapted for measurement on the reflecting goniome- ter. Although the author had no reflecting goniometer at hand, the faces were readily identified by means of the contact goniometer. : The crystals vary in size from 1°™ to 2°5" in diameter and are of a reddish-brown color. wa #Am. J. Sci. Vol. V, 1898, p. 127. +Am, Jour. Sci., vol., xlviii, p. 215, 1894. JOURNAL. OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society VOL. XV 1898 OHAPEL, HILL, N:* ©. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY eG Rl Ps eee ETA FEAT Ser i Oe Chena ALT: hin o Journal of the Mitchell Society. CONTENTS. VOL. XV. 1898. The Nature of the Change from Violet to Green in Solution of Chro- mium Salts.—/. P. Venable and F. W. Miller............ccccccccscecceess 1 Nesting Habits of Some Southern Birds in Eastern N. C.—T. G. Pearson ; | 17 PERO E SEES E HEE EHH EEE EEE EEE EHH HEHE EE EH EEHEHE HEHEHE EEE EE EEE ESE EEHEESESEEERESEHS MEME Re PR Peper cts rio hea velniaduee ceetgadcie's «se Onenacacneus seven dénmanaacesmaiee 22 Natural Science of the Ancients as Interpreted by Lucretius.—F. P. . I Se cra Mea aiek far ste coe Aalds Valais nev dupe aeemigwe nan eneasdeneees ase 62 On the Feasibility of Raising Sponges from the Egg.—H. V. Wilson...... | 7 Distribution of Witceaower ine. OJ. As obese sineacpuasenseness 92 ra reiting, — WW, Wi. ASfe.. 0... :c0ssccsdssneocdoace-dvereedasoadaad sntecopecer- +22- // 2 JOURNAL OF THE -Glisha Mitchell Scientific. Soviet VOLUME IV are PART FIRST January: Jume 1898 POST OFFICE CHAPEL HILL, N. C. ISSUED FROM THE UNIVERSITY PRESSES CHAPEL HILL, N. C. TABLE OF CONTETS. \ . THE NATURE OF THE CHANGE FROM VIOLET TO GREEN IN SOLUTIONS OF CHROMIUM SALTS. rf PP. Venable and F.-W. Millers... . 2... $e 1 NESTING HABITS OF SOME SOUTHERN BIRDS IN HASTERN NorTH CAROLINA. Bae PEL 2 RE etelaNe co's ile doh ag ka oa 17 Tae DICHOTOMOUS GROUP OF PANICUM IN THE KASTERN UNITED STATES. NATURAL SCIENCE OF THE ANCIENTS AS INTERPRETED BY LUCRETIUS. mA: Wanable .:)... Ueto oc Ate 2 62 JOURNAL OF THE Flisha Mitchell Scientific Society. FIFTEENTH YEAR—PART ONE. 1898. THE NATURE OF THE CHANGE FROM VIOLET TO GREEN IN SOLUTIONS OF CHROM- IUM SALTS. By F. P. VENABLE AND F. W. MILLER. It is a well-known fact that solutions of certain chrom- ium salts which are violet in color become green on heat- ing. This has been especially noticed in the case of the chrome-alums and of the sulphate, but is also true of the nitrate, chloride, and acetate, in fact, of all the soluble compounds of chromium. A reverse reaction also takes place and all of these solutions made green by heating become violet again on standing, the nitrate, chloride, and acetate very rapidly, the sulphate and alums slowly, and often only after prolonged standing. It is quite rea- sonable to suppose that these changes are caused by sim- ilar reactions in the case of various salts, and that there is one explanation for all. A large number of explanations have been offered by various investigators. In fact it is surprising to find how many have been drawn to investigate these changes and what an amount of work has been done upon them. Perhaps the difficult nature of the problem has been the great source of attraction. Fischer’ and Jacquelain’ 1Kastner’s Archiv., 14, 164. 2 Compt. rend., 24, 439. 9 JOURNAL OF ‘THE have attributed these changes to a separation of the chromium sulphate from the alkaline sulphate; Berze- lius' and Fremy’ assigned as the cause of the changes the formation of a basic sulphate; Recoura and Whitney’ and Dougal‘ have considered the true cause to be the for- mation of a chrom-sulphuric acid; Schrétter? suggested a partial dehydration, and Etard’ also thought the change due to an alteration in hydration; Roscoe and Schorlemmer’ regarded the green solutions as containing mixtures of basic and acid salts; Loewel* advanced the theory of an isomeric change. It is quite manifest that any theory like that of Fis- cher and Jacquelain, based upon an examination of the alums alone, is quite inadequate. It is further evident that any phenomenon which has aroused so great a va- riety of speculations as this must be considered very care- fully with due weighing of every known fact. These facts are numerous and important. HOW THE CHANGE MAY BE BROUGHT ABOUT. Chrome-alum is soluble in six parts of water ; the vio- let solution suffers the alum slowly to crystallize out unchanged by spontaneous evaporation; but if heated to between 50° and 75° it turns green and, according to the extent of decomposition, either deposits on evaporation a brilliant, green, amorphous, difficultly soluble mass, or ‘‘yields crystals of sulphate of potash, leaving green sul- phate of chromic oxide in solution.’” Schrétter says the change takes place at 65°-70°. He 1 Ann. Phys. Chem., 61, 1. 2 Compt. rend., 47, 883. 3 Ztschr. phys. Chem., 1896, 20, 40. 4J, Chem. Soc., Lond., 7896, 69, 1526. ; 5Pogg. Ann., 53, 513. 6 Compt. rend., 84, 1090. 7Treatise on Chemistry, First Edition, Vol. IJ, Pt. II, 163. by..a, Pharm, (3),>7, Se... 9Fischer, cited in Gmelin: Handbuch, 7850, IV, 149. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 3 further states that the crystals of potassium sulphate separate only from a highly concentrated solution and in small quantity. Sprung has shown, in experiments to be quoted later, that the change begins at a temperature under 30°. We have repeatedly attempted to secure the separation . of crystals of potassium sulphate as described by Fischer and Schrétter, but without success. The exact condi- tions are clearly difficult to hit upon, if such a separation is at all possible. Alkaline hydroxides and carbonates, according to van Cleeff,’ turn violet solutions of the alums green, and Etard’ has shown that they bring about the same change in solutions of the normal sulphate. Sulphuric acid, phosphorus trichloride, and nitric acid, according to Etard, bring about the same change, but Otto’ says that sulphuric acid does not turn solutions of the alum green if rise of temperature is prevented. Schrétter says that nitric acid turns green solutions of chromium sulphate blue again. Our experiments along this line resulted as follows: First as to the action of acids. Hydrochloric acid had no action upon either violet or green solutions, nor does it apparently have any influence upon the change from one to the other on heating. Sulphuric acid brought about no change in either in the cold, but has a retarding influence upon the change on heating. This was so marked in one or two experiments that 1t was thought the change would be entirely prevented. Nitric acid had no appreciable immediate effect upon either in the cold. On heating with the violet the retarding action was ereater than when sulphuric acid was used, and the solu- tien resumed its violet color on cooling. Acetic acid had 1J. prakt. Chem. (2), 23, 58. 2 Compt. rend., 84, 1090. 3Graham-Otto, 4 Aufl., 3, 113, 4 JOURNAL OF THE apparently no influence. As to the action of alkalies, sodium or potassium, or ammonium hydroxide, or the car- bonates, readily turned the violet solutions green. They had no action upon green solntions. CHANGES IN PHYSICAL PROPERTIES. In the case of chromic sulphate, Sprung’ has shown that the violet solution with about twenty-four per cent. of the salt has the specific gravity 1.1619. while the green is 1.1486. So too with the alum there is an in- crease of volume, which has been noticed by Siewert and also by Mohr,’ and a decrease of volume is observed as the green solution reverts to the violet. Lecoq de Bois- baudran* has also observed these changes, noting that they are independent of the concentration of the solution, the presence of crystals, or whether the vessel is open or closed. The changes in density can be reckoned from his dilatometric observations. Dougal’ has shown that the alteration in density of even a dilute solution of chrome-alum, after boiling, may readily be detected by a specific gravity bottle. In this manner, one, two and a half, and five per cent. solutions were experimented upon. ‘The actual amount of change depended upon the duration of the heating and the length of time which had elapsed since the green solution had been prepared. The violet solutions became specifically lighter when changed to green by boiling. The transformation is accompanied therefore by expansion. According to Sprung the violet and green solutions show a difference in internal friction or viscosity. The ratios af diffusion out of capillaries at temperatures 10° 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, of the green to the violet were as 100 iN. Arch, ph. nat., 53, 112. 2 Ber. d. chem. Ges., 4, 318. 8 Compt. rend., 79, 1491, 4J. Chem. Soc. Lond., 7896, 69, 1597, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 5 fo00:70': to 67.77; to 68.74; to 70.79; to 75.72. From this it is seen that the change begins at less than 30°, and from this arises the observation that has been made that the solution of the alum turns somewhat green at ordinary temperatures. The diffusion of these solutions has also been carefully studied with a view to throwing light upon this puzzling problem. With regard to the sulphate it has been shown by van Cleeff! that green solutions on being dialyzed yield dia- lysates containing a larger proportion of acids. This had been repeatedly investigated in the case of the alum. Thus van Cleeff has found that in the dialysis of the ereen solution of the alum, relatively more sulphuric acid goes into the dialysate than when the violet solution is dialyzed. Dougal’ has also carried out careful expert- ments along this line. ‘Time, temperature, strength of the dialysate, amount of initial change, amount of retrogres- sion, all affected the results, and little beyond the facts stated above could be deduced from them. The experi- ments were made upon solutions containing one per cent. of the alum. While the author states that no compari- son could justly be made between the experiments, it may be noted that the ratio of increase in acidity was fairly regular and ranged between one-seventh and one-sixth. A few experiments were undertaken upon the dialysis of the alum before Dougal’s experiments were known to us. They were not pushed to completion when these lat- ter became known, especially as there seemed little chance of their throwing much light upon the nature of the change. CHANGES IN CHEMICAL PROPERTIES. One of the most singular changes in chemical proper- tT]. prakt, Chem. (2), 23, 58. 2]. Chem. Soc. Lond., 2896, 69, 1527. 6 JOURNAL OF THE ties is that noted in the action of the sulphate or alum, before and after heating, upon solutions of barium or lead salts. This was first observed by Loewel' and was studied by Favre and Valson.* A _ violet solution on be- ing treated in the cold with a solution of barium chloride, yields practically all of its sulphuric acid as barium sul- phate. A cold green solution forms a precipitate slowly, and even after a number of hours the precipitation is far from complete. On boiling, all of the sulphuric acid will be precipitated. Favre and Valson found that only one- third of the sulphuric acid present in the original chromic sulphate was precipitated in the cold by the barium chloride. Our own experiments upon this point were as follows: A weighed amount of the pure alum was dissolved and the solution made up to a definite quantity. Two aliquot portions were taken, one of which was heated for half an hour and allowed to cool. ‘Then both portions were pre- cipitated with an excess of barium chloride. It was found impossible to filter these immediately with asbestos felts or the best filter-paper. They were therefore al- lowed to stand about twenty-four hours. This very long standing probably changed the conditions somewhat, but we were unable to avoid it. Still the results would con- firm the observations of Favre and Valson. The pro- longed standing also showed that it was not merely a de- layed precipitation, but one partially prevented. I EH, Percentage of SOg3 in alum is 32.06............ Percentage of SOg in alum, violet solution PLECIMI ATEN GONE ok g by be a cee ew nS} yeaa le8 30.44 30.19 Percentage of SO3 in alum, green solution heated one-half hour......... TREE OSE I Percentage of SO 3 in alum, green solution heated one hour: : oS. u ceo beet ree eR 22.87 21.83 1J, Pharm. (3), 4, 32. 2 Compt. rend., 77, 803. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 7 These experiments were upon solutions containing one gram to 100 cc. A solution twice as strong was next taken: i. Tk Percentage in violet solution precipitated COLES SSRN ES NORE Og en Sa eR teen 28.88 31.80 Percentage in green solution (heated one nour) precipitated colds ys 2.3 5....5 0440. 19.55 21.47 Again a solution containing 0.5 gram to the 100 ce. was taken. Percentage in violet solution precipitated cold....... 28.30 Percentage in green solution (heated one hour) pre- SAWS eae GRC s 65'S sg ahi ey ofa ROG AIa 6 Ele aS ao. eS 23.00 The difficulties of washing and filtering barium sul- phate precipitated in this manner account in part for the lack of agreement between the analyses, but two things are evident; first, that all the sulphuric acid is not pre- cipitated from either v olet or green solutiens in the cold, and, secondly, that a short boiling effects such a change that only two-thirds of the sulphuric acid is precipitated by barium chloride in the cold. he amount not precipi- tated ranged from 9.06 to 13.51 per cent. Many observations have been recorded as to the acidity of the violet and green solutiens of the alum. NRecoura! has stated that the vapors coming from a solution at 100° are acid, while the solid salt at the same temperature does not lose any acid. He further maintains that the green solution, left after the heating, contains a considerable amount of free acid. He made use of the heat of neutral- ization as a means of measuring the degree of acidity. A known amount of soda was added to the liquid and the heat liberated was measured. In so far as this corres- ponds with the heat liberated by the neutralization of free sulphuric acid in the same degree of dilution, he conclud- ed that he was dealing with free acid. According to his 1 Compt. rend., 112, 1440. 2 Ann. Phys. Chem. (3) 61, 218. 8 JOURNAL OF THE experiments there was one-half of an equivalent of sul- phuric acid for every equivalent of chromium sulphate. It was Kruger’ who first attempted to show in 1844 the presence of free sulphuric acid in the green solution. He thought this was proved by the acidity of the layer of alcohol poured over the green solution. Baubigny and Pechard’ have shown that the alum has always an acid reaction even aiter purification by means of alcohol. Further they regarded the following experi- ment as proving a partial dissociation of the salt. To twenty cc. of a saturated solution of the alum, three- tenths gram of ammonia gas was added, and, after shak- ing, the liquid was neutral to methyl orange; after some time the liquid which had become green on the addition of the ammonia, yielded violet crystals with strong acid- reaction and the mother-liquor had become acid to methyl orange. Whitney‘ has also attempted to prove the presence of acid by physical methods. Sodium hydroxide and barium hydroxide respectively were added to the green solution. The addition of a base must lower the conductivity of the solution as long as free sulphuric acid is being neutralized. He found the minimum when he hid added one-sixth of an equivalent of sodium hydroxide to the chromium sul- phate, or one-third of an equivalent of barium hydroxide. No explanation was given of the variation in the results. He also claimed to have proved the presence of free acid by the catalysis of methyl acetate. Lastly, the inverting action of green solutions of chromium chloride, acetate, nitrate, and sulphate was tried upon sugar solutions. He came to the conclusion that in the case of the chloride and nitrate, two-thirds of the acid was set free on boiling ; of the acetate more than two-thirds,and of the sulphate less than one third. In our own experiments as to the relative 1 Compt. rend., 115, 604. 2 Ztschr. phys. Chem., 1896, 20, 40. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 9 acidity of the violet and green solutions, it was seen that both solutions were acid. We tried a large number of the usual indicators, but the violet and green colors of the solutions interfered too much to give any results with them which could be regarded as at all satisfactory. It was fonund that fair resuits could be obtained by using a decinormal solution of ammonia and noting the first ap- pearance of a permanent precipitate. Tenth-normal ammonia. ie Per etais it MA Ce, Cold: Treqaired ie ot. en 27.5 ef see nth. 6) boiled onernelh hour }oc (Le. dol 27.6 a + ap: pO. Sti ceeneie TAGE ee i tw es 26,5." te bk Alege Nee AL MRE ol Fg PR a ee Re 26.5 During the boiling, the water evaporated was repeatedly restored. Unless this was done a little acid was lost, and even with this precaution there was a small loss, and this may explain the acidity of the vapors coming off at at 100° as observed by Recoaru. The experiments therefore agree with those of Baub- igny and Pechard, but are at variance with the conclusions ef the’other authors mentioned. We think the experi- mental data of these authors do not afford sufficient and satisfactory evidence to serve as a basis for their conclu- sions that free sulphuric acid exists in the solution. The methods adopted are very indirect and the results capa- ble of other explanations. THE EXISTENCE OF CHROMO-SULPHURIC ACIDS. « Several articles have been published by Recoura’ upon chromo-sulphuric acids. He claims to have prepared several of these and regards the formation of such bodies as a probable explanation of the change 1n the green so- lutions, and others, as Whitney and Dougal, seem to ac- cept his explanation. Recoura thinks there are two isomeric modifications of chromium sulphate; one violet, . one green, and also another green sulphate not isomeric, 10 JOURNAL OF THE but basic (2Cr,O,.5SO,). These he refers to three condi- tions of chromic hydroxide: 'Cr,(OH),, precipitated by alkalies from violet chromic salts; Cr,O(OH),,, corres- ponding to the basic sulphate and non-isolable; Cr,O(OH),, precipitated by alkalies from green solutions. Solutions of this latter in acids, he says, are not precipitated by solutions of barium salts. This last statement is not strictly true. Such solutions are partially precipitated by barium salts just as all green solutions are. He as- signs to the green sulphate the formula Cr,O,.3SO,.11H,O, which he says has quite a different constitution from that ’ of the violet sulphate. Proofs for this statement he does not give. Thisisomeric green sulphate, he says, possesses neither the characteristics of a sulphate nor of a chro- mium salt. One molecule can combine with one molecule of either sulphuric acid or a metallic sulphate. Thus we may have Cr,(SO,),.H,SO,, or Cr,(SQ,),.K,SO,. In these compounds all the sulphuric acid is in a non-precipitable form, he maintains. Hiscrucial experiment is as follows: ‘*Mix a solution containing one molecule of Cr,(SQO,), with a solution containing one molecule of sulphuric acid or asulphate. Union is immediate, for barium chloride will now give no precipitate and the solution therefore holds no sulphate. The new radical is unstable, for pre- cipitation is immediate on boiling, or in concentrated solu- tions or in dilute selutions on standing one-half hour. /¢ 7s necessary to work with very dilute solutions, otherwise the radical containing chromium %7s decomposed.” Of course such reasoning would give us these same strange isomeric metal-sulphuric acids in all sulphates, for if they are diluted enough it will take half an hour or more for the precipitate to form with barium chloride. On such slender basis Recoura builds up a series of salts of a hypothetical chromo-sulphuric acid (Cr,.4SQO,),. 1 Compt., rend., 113, 1037 ; 114, 477 ; 116, 1367. a ree Pe oe PO eg ee ee ee ee — ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 11 He has also prepared a chromo-disulphuric acid; ete); by evaporating solutions of chromium sulphate with two. three, etc., molecules of sulphuric acid, and then heating to 110°-120°. Calvert and Ewart’ have shown that, on diluting these, they all leave a colloidal Cr,(SO,);.H,- SO, upon the septum, the liquid passing through free of chromium. ‘The behavior of these solutions makes it ap- pear probable that the chromo sulphuric acids de not exist ‘1 them as such, but are hydrolyzed, forming the colloidal substance, Cr,(SO,),.H,SO,, and free sulphuric acid. Our repeated experiments have failed to show the presence of this colloidal body in the ordinary green solutions of the alum or sulphate. A boiled solution of either, even though very concentrated, will pass entirely through an unglazed porcelain suction filter, such as Calvert and Ew- art made use of. There seems to be no colloidal body present. We cannot regard the experiments of Recoura as ad- vancing the subject in any degree. Asan explanation of the changes it is by no means satisfactory. Dougal’s formula for the reaction causing the change, is even more remarkable and baseless : 2[Cr,(SO,),. K.SO,J+ 0,0 ra [Cr,O(SO,),JSO, + 2K,S0,-+- | H,SO,. This is not based upon Dougal’s own experimonts but is offered as an explanation deduced from the work of Re- coura, Whitney, Favre, and Valson. THE ACTION OF ALCOHOL. There have been several investigations of the action of alcohol, both upon the sulphate and the alum, with the hope of throwing some light upon the changes under con- sideration. ‘[raube? states that the solid salt is unatf- fected by boiling alcohol. Schrétter has observed’ that 1 Chem. News. 74, 121. 2 Hun. Chem. (Liebig), 66, 168. 3 Pogg. Ann., 53, 413. 12 JOURNAL OF THE solutions covered with a layer of alcohol become gradu- ally green and the concentrated green solution is not dis- solved by alcohol. Of course the first observation does not necessarily connect the alcohol with the change. Al- cohol in large amounts precipitates from violet solutions ef the sulphate a pale violet colored, crystalline pow- der, and decolorizes the liquid.’ This can be used as a mode of purifying the alum.? S:ewert® states that, when the violet sulphate is dissolved in a small amount of water and boiled with alcohol until the crystals formed are again taken up and then precipitated with ether, a green syrup is gotten which consists of 5Cr,O,12SO,.7H,O and the mother-liquor contains suiphuric acid in a condi- tion in which it is net precipitated by barium chloride. Kriiger’ states that alcohol precipitates from a green so- lution of the alum a green oil which solidifies and which contains only two-thirds of the sulphuric acid. Siewert confirms this and says that this substance has approxi- mately the composition 6K,0.5€r,O,.18SO,.H,O. Kri- ever mentioned the acidity of the alcohol used in precipi- tating the green oily liquid and evidently regarded it as withdrawing sulphuric acid from the original salt. He also mentioned the formation of a basic salt, by heating the green solution until it becomes rose-red, which con- tains half as much acid as the neutral salt and is insolu- ble in water. After a careful consideration of the results obtained by others by means of alcohol, it seemed to us quite possible that these might afford a clue to the explanation we were in search of. It was necessary to examine with care the action upon both the violet and the green solutions. Our experiments are therefore given in detail, and it will be 1 Gmelin’s Handuch, IV, 127. 2 Baugigny and Pechard :Loc. cit. 3 Ann. Chem. (Liebig), 125, 97. 4 Ann. Phys. Chem., 61, 318. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 13 seen that they agree in part only with the observations just quoted. Action on the Violet Solution.—W hen alcohol was ad- ded to the violet solution of alum, fine violet crystals were precipitated, which gave on analysis the following re- sults: Calculated for Found. KoCre(SO4)4.12H:O. r Fi; oe ee eee 13.32 13.68 13.36 ee aN ai Read ay 9.99 9.80 Sg oe ss os 49.99 48.85 This may be an old observation that on Supatantitite from alcohol the, crystals contain only half the usual amount of water, but we have not met with it anywhere. The fact that this very considerable change of hydration effects no change in color nor in the precipitating power of barium chloride, argues against the partial dehydra- tion theory of Schrétter and Etard. It should be added that the precipitation was carried out with absolute alco- hol upon concentrated solutions of the alum, was rapid, and the precipitate was immediately removed. There seemed to be two layers of crystals, one ef violet crystals (upper) and the othera heliotrope powder. Analysis show- ed that the cemposition of both was the same and that the difference was probably oneof subdivision. The pre- cipitation is almost complete, as the alcohol shows very little color. From this it is evident that alcohol itself does not materially affect the violet solutions. Action on the Green Solutions.—Green ee of the alum were first experimented with. When absolute alcohol is added to concentrated solutions of chrome alum, which have been boiled until green and allowed to cool, a dark green gummy mass separates out after a short time. If the boiling is not sufficiently prolonged there will form afterwards a few violet crystals. The alcohol retains something in solution, as is shown by the green color. This amount retained may be considerable if much water 14 JOURNAL OF THE is present. It would seem then, that alcohol precipitates out the body and makes it available for analysis and exami- nation. Ifa portion of this green, gummy mass is taken and dissolved in water, it exhibits the same behavior to- wards barium chloride as has been observed in the green solutions. In one or two cases it was observed that the part remaining dissolved in the alcohol yielded practical- ly all of its sulphuric acid to barium chloride in the cold. The green mass was thoroughly washed with alcohol and dried over sulphuric acid. It also dries to a brittle mass if exposed in thin layers to the atmosphere. It is quite insoluble in alcohol, but soluble in water. A number of preparations of this substance were made and analyzed and the results are in such agreement that one is inclined to believe that the substance is a definite compound. Fifteen grams of chrome alum were dissolved in 100 cc. water and boiled for one hour to a concentration of fifty cc. ‘This was cooled and precipitated by the addition of 100 cc. of absolute alcohol. The green mass obtained on drying weighed about eight grams. This was carefully analyzed : | Calculated for Found. 7K2SO45. re(SO4)3Cre(OH)¢4.H,0O. I. aT: III. IV. 2h Ra at etna a GR 18.07 18.23 18.32 1802 17,76 eee ces ft a be ote 15.88 15,18 15.63 15.78 ae SL eS ee Sh 5 61.08 60.55 60.73 02 eae Analysis III and 1V were from other preparations, made, however, in a similar manner to that just describ- ed. This substance appears to have quite a complicated constitution, and it is not easy to see the part played by the potassium sulphate. It do esnot seem to be a matter of accidental occurrence, however. ‘The important feature is that the saltisa basicone. Siewert gives, as the result of his analysis, 6K,O0.5Cr,O,.18SO,.H,O, for which the following percentages would be required: Cr,18.7; K, 16.8; SO,, 61.9. While these percentages differ some- what from those obtained by us, the agreement is suffi- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 15 cently close to show that the substances examined were practically the same. On concentrating the liquid poured off from the green gum, it was repeatedly observed that more of the gum was obtained. Fer instance, in the experiment described where the green mass from fifteen grams weighed about eight grams, a further portion weighing 0.3915 gram was gotten. The analysis of this yielded the following per- centages : Cr, 13.66; K, 8.57; and SO,, 55.45. Wecounld only regard this as a mixture consisting in part of the green basic mass which had not completely separated out. The small amount of material left in solution (less than one-half gram) consisted of a little chromium with sulphuric acid in the ratio of about five to one. Next the action on chromium sulphate was examined. The chromium sulphate used was in the form of small violet scales or crystals. It was a commercial product and the method of its preparation was unknown to us. An analysis of it gave: Tei is therefore a basic chromate, but we have seen no such body described in the books. It dissolved in water with a green color. Fifteen grams of this disselved in 100 cc. of water, boiled to a concentration of 50 cc. and pre- cipitated with 100 cc. of alcohol, yielded about ten grams of the green, gummy mass, very similar in appearance to that obtained from the alum, but more soluble in alcohol. In a second experiment twelve grams were taken and treated in the same way, and yielded about eight grams. The analysis showed these to be identical. Calculated for Found. Cro (SO4)3.Cre(OH)¢.15H, 0. ye II. III. ie is is 4g wee OO 22.41 * 22-40 22.69 3 OS etter Penhe 33.17 34.64 34.73 34.43 Wareei to. 0S 550% 43.77 iy PS ae The agreement is far from satisfactory, but the body is evidently a basic salt. oe 16 JOURNAL OF THE On evaporating the liquid portions other masses were obtained. ‘These were also analyzed : Calculated for Found. 2Cry(SO4)3.Cro(OH),.20H2O 1. II. III. Ree eieehs i ndnieces 22.70 22.93 22.71 22.98 =) UN aS Ege ie, ey: 42.72 42.72 43.32 43.46 sf ot I al a A ene a 34.57 This is less basic than the previous compound. As the alcohol left is decidedly acid, it must contain either free acid or an acid sulphate. It did not seem to be necessary to prepare other chro- mium sulphates, as these experiments were in accord with those obtained with the alum, and lack of time made it necessary te bring the experiments to an end. CONCLUSIONS. On weighing the experimental evidence which has been brought to bear upon these changes, it is an easy matter to exclude some of the explanations offered. : Thus the dissociation of the alum into chromium and potassium sul- phates and similar theories which will not cover the ca- ses of the nitrates, chlorides, etc., must of course be dropped. The formation of chromo-sulphuric acid, as suggested by Recoura, is not tenable in the light of the experiments performed. The theory of the change of hy- dration is not satisfactory, since it has been seen that a loss of one-half the water did not bring about the change of color. The theory of Berzelius, however of the formation of basic salts of chromium which would naturaily be green and uncrystallizable, offers a full and sufficient explana- ' tion of the changes, and is in accord with the observa- tions so far as they have been verified by us. It accounts quite plausibly for the partial withholding of the sul- phuric acid from precitation by barium chloride in the cold, and is strongly confirmed by the experiments with alcohol. ‘This theory is also in accord with the facts that BLISHA MITCHELL SCIKNTIFIC SOCIBTY. 17 the green coloration may be brought about by the addi- tion of alkaline substances, and that it is retarded by the addition of sulphuric or nitric acid. It is also easy to ap- ply this explanation to the cases of-the nitrate, chloride, acetate, and soluble compounds of chromium. When we have opportunity we propose examining the action of al- cohel upon these other compounds. NESTING HABITS OF SOME SOUTHERN FORMS OF BIRDS IN EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA. T. GILBERT PEARSON. The coastal region of North Carolina, especially south of Hatteras, having its temperature moderated by warm- er ocean currents affords many interesting forms of life both in the fauna and flora whose natural habitat would naturally be looked for at a much more southern point. Thus the palmetto (Sabal palmetto) which’ grows wild to a height of 30 feet on Smith’s Island is also found in a more stunted form as far north as the banks of Cape Hatteras. This northward extension of the habitat of some Southern birds is somewhat in keeping with that of the flora. While spending some time in eastern North Carolina during the past summer I observed there some species of southern birds which have hitherto been overlooked by ornithologists as occuring within the limits of this State; and my purpose in publishing the following notes 1s to record such of these observations as may be of interest. 2 : 18 JOURNAL OF THE Worthington’s Marsh Wren.'! (Czslothoraus palustris LTiseus). | The range of this bird as given by Mr. Brewster’ and later by Frank M. Chapman in his ‘‘Handbook of Birds of Eastern North America”’ is the ‘Coast of South Car- olina and Georgia.”’ In the marsh on Gull Island in Pamlico sound about twenty miles north of Cape Hatter- as marsh wrens were found in great numbers on May 20th. The island which is approximately two hundred acres in extent is little more than a continuous salt marsh over the greater part of which the water rises at high storm tides. At the time of my visit the birds were in full song and from every side of the marsh came the notes of scores of birds. While singing the performers usually occupied positions entirely out of sight except as occasionally they would make short flights upward and burst into song as they dropped back again into the cov- er of the high thick grass. It was evidently too early in the season for the birds to be breeding for, of the twelve nests found and exam- ined, there were none that contained either eggs or young. The nests were suspended among the grass stalks at dis- tances varying from sixteen to twenty inches above the eround or shailow waters. They were entirely roofed ever and varied in form from almost round to elliptical. They were composed of the dead stems and _ blades of marsh grass neatly wound and woven together while the material was yet damp, thus forming a strong and very durable structure. The entrance was a small opening in 17.his new variety was described by William Brewster in the Auk for July 1893, Vol. 10, pp. 215-219. It differs from the species C. palustris mainly in having the black of the upper parts duller and less extended, brown of the sides, flanks and upper parts much paler and grayish, and the dark markings of the un- der parts confused and inconspicuous. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 19 the side near the top of the nest.’ A specimen taken at this time was identified by Mr. C. S. Brimley, of Raleigh, N. C. as being a Worthing- ton’s Marsh Wren. On June the 9th I heard wrens singing in the marshes near Southport which I took to be of this species but as no specimens were secured [I shall not claim this asa record. During July and the early part of August wrens were frequently heard in the salt marshes about Beaufort har- bor. ae eT Meets ares 30. P. linearifolium. Spikelets barely 1” long, no basal panicles developed 3l. P. Werneri. Leaves narrowed to the base, lanceolate or narrower, spikelets 14”’ —1%” long, plant nearly glabrous, lower nodes barbed 32. P. nemo- panthum, Stems simple at length fasciculately branched erect, or sometimes prostrate, stem leaves numerous, scattered, spreading or ascending, lanceolate, 1%”—8” wide, clasping by a rounded or narrowed base, the upper generally not conspicuously reduced in size, and never elongated, the basal usually shorter than those of the stem; spikelets less than 14%” long. Nearly or quite glabrous species without a long hairy ligule. Nodes not barbed, spikelets 34”—1” long. Plant strict, erect. Leaves spreading, narrowed to the smooth base 33. P. dichotomum. Leaves ascending. Base of leaves narrowed, rounded, ciliate, sheaths TOE IO LECED 7255405, a ons vere 34. P. boreale. Leaves narrowed to the glabrous base, sheaths et = | ee eer ERR ges os i Te 35. P, maculatum. Plant rising from a geniculate base. Leaves, oo fone, 54 ee 36. P. Roanokense. Leaves less than 1%’ long ......... 37. P. demissum. Nodes barbed. Spikelets 1) lone <5 or. es ote 38. P. Mattamusketense. MiP eelers eae CORE eS Peteet Pols a y's 39. P. barbulatum, Nodes not barbed, spikelets less than 34” long. Strict, not prostrate or reclining ; 8’—16’ high. Leaves 1”°—3” wide, with a firm, white margin 40. P. ensifolium., Leaves 1” wide or less, densely tufted. Branched only from the base ... 41. P. Baldwinii. Much branched towards top of culm...... 42. P. Wrightianum. Stems at first erect, at length elongated and reclining, spikelets obovate, 4” long ........ 43. P. sphagnicolum, Stems prostrate, spikelets broadly elliptical 34” long 44. P. lucidum. Stems ascending or reclining, spikelets narrowly ellipti- cal, 33h" Senge 0.1 anne. vere mee 45. P. Cuthbertii. Nearly or quite glabrous species with a long pilose ligule. Spikelets 2”’ long or less. Spikelets about '%” long ‘i. 6.61 7.26. 46. P. parvispiculatum, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 27 Spikelets scarcely 4” longi ts ite at. tise. 47. P. leucothrix. Spikelets 4°’—1” long, obovate. Panicle oblong, its branches erect or ascending Katonii. Panicle broadly ovate, its branches spreading. Leaves erect, panicle 1%’ long or less 49, P. Columbianuin, Leaves ascending, panicle 1’—3’ long .... 50. P. nitiduim. Sheaths more or less pubescent and often stems and leaves, Leaves 4”—8” wide, spikelets 4”—1\” long. Strict, 2ft.—3ft tall, pubescence villous .. 51. P. Huachucae. Stems ascending, geniculate at base. . Pubescence pilose, velvety, spikelets oval 1%”’ long 52, P. viscidum. Pubescence villous, ascending, spikelets obovate, 1” bone. Noire s Aatetge 3 sia tee tart vee. 03. P. ciliiferum. Stems erect, at length decumbent, leaves appressed pubes- cent beneath. Spikelets %’’ long, leaves, ascending 54. P. tsugetorum. Spikelets 4” long, leaves spreading 55 P. Tennesseense. Leaves 2’’—4”" wide, spreading or ascending, spikelets about 1” long. Lower branches of panicle BSCE, , pubescence hirsute-pa- Pre ROR Sia sates eR 5 fra wlth Mh eiate pa 56. P. Atlanticum. Lower branches of panicle spreading. Strict, leaves spreading, basal leaves not prominent. Pubescence rough, ascending, spikelets nearly spher- ical or broadly elliptical ........ 57. P. scoparioide. Pubescence, villous, long, spreading spikelets ellip- tic mika: ale chs aa iene RAI bead ts 58. P. villosissimuim. Pubescence softer, ascending spikelets elliptic 59. P. pubescens. Strict ; leaves erect or ascending. Leaves lanceolate, panicle as broad as fies Pubescence ascending-appressed .... 60. P. Com- monsianum. Pubescence ascending or spreadiug...... GAL haemacarpon. Leaves linear-lanceolate, panicle sploue pao 62. P arenicolum, Tufted, stems soon reclining; few-leaved, basal leaves very numerous and long... .....45-.: 63. P. laxiflorum. Leaves 2”—4” wide, spikelets 4”—%” long. Lower branches of panicle ascending 64. P. lanuginosuim., Lower branches of panicle wide-spreading. Sheaths papillose-hirsute ........ 65. P. implicatum., Lower sheaths velvety, and nodes barbed .... 66. P. annulum. 28 JOURNAL OF THE ’ Leaves less than 2” wide, erect, low species. Pamole’ 1-132" lone. 2). wae 67. P. meridionale. Pasiclestess than :]’ dongs Sr. sti, 68. P. filiculme. Stem leaves few, short, 1%’ long or generally much less, distant, the densely tufted basal leaves as long as the stem leaves or nearly so, and broader; spikeletsf"long or less. Basal leaves ciliate around the entire margin; otherwise glab- rous. Spieciels elipric, ‘I long, Arca iesk as 69. P. ciliatum. Spikelets. cbovate, 4 long... ...0..5..05. 70. P. polycaulon. Basal leaves soft pubescent as well as ciliate 71. P. longipedun- culatum. Margin of basal leaves not ciliate. yor i toeg sb 2 crt a1 | Eee he ce Oe Eeay See oe 72, P. microphyllum, Stems glabrous, ligule short, pubescent, .... 73. P. Brittoni. Stems glabrous, ligule none ........... 74. P. glabrissimum. 1) PANICUM PORTERIANUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 22:420 (1895). P. lalzfoltwm Walt. Fl. Car. (1788). Not. oi (1753). P. Walteri Poir., (1816). Not Pursh. (1814). Stems somewhat tufted, erect, columnar, soft-villous, or nearly glabrous, at first simple, at length somewhat branched at the top. Sheaths shorter than the inter- nodes, or the upper ones overlapping, soft pubesScext, or nearly glabrous and only the nodes barbed with soft hairs, ligule a mere margin. Primary leaves ovate-lan- ceolate, 2?—23’ long, ~’-—1’ wide, cordate at base, abrupt- ly acuminate, glabrous or roughish above, ¢labrous or soft-pubescent beneath, 6—13-nerved ; secondary leaves smalier. Panicle short-peduncled, 2’—4’ long, ovate, the few branches ascending or spreading ; spikelets rath- er few, obovate, acute, nearly 2” long, pubescent. Northern Florida and Texas to Missouri and New York. 2) PANICUM MACROCARPON Le Conte, Torr. Cat. 91 (1819). Stem strict, 12—20° high. glabrous. Sheaths olabrous ; ligule a mere margin. Leaves 2—4 lone, about 1’ or more broad, 7—11l-nerved, glabrous, except the rough, ciliate margins. Panicle 3—4 long, the few- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 99 flowered branches single, ascending ; spikelets nearly 2 long, broadiy obovate, obtuse. | Plant bright green. Maine and Ontario, to Minnessota, Missouri and North Carolina. Generally confused with P. Porterianum. 'This species has been supposed to be confined to Vermont, New York, Penn- sylvania, and New Jersey. Maine: Fernald,, 1897: Ontario: Biltmore Herbarium, No. 7066. Missouri: Stewart Weller, 1894. North Carolina: Ashe; Mitchell Co., July, 1893. Iowa: Hitch- cock, 1889, 3) PANICUM COMMELINAEFOLIUM Ashe, sp. nov. Culms tufted, erect or ascending, 8—15' high, stout, more or less pubescent. Sheaths more than half the length of the internodes, generally softly pubescent ; ligule a mere margin. Leaves crowded, longer than the internodes, spreading or ascending, ovate-lanceolate, acuminate, abruptly narrowed to the cordate base, 11-15 -nerved, 2—3' long, 6’—14" wide, glabrous abeve, min- utely pubescent beneath, the margins ciliate and serru- late. Panicle ovate, 2—3' long, short-peduncled, branches numerous, spreading ; spikelets smooth, ellipti- cal, 14° long, the first scale one-third the length of the 7- nerved second and third. Later forms branched above, with smaller leaves, the smaller panicles partly included in the sheaths. A species having the foliage of P. Portertanum, and the spikelets of P. commutatum. Based on material collected by Dr. J. K. Small near Stone Mt., Ga., Aug. 1—6, 1895, and distributed as P. commutatum. 4) PANICUM CLANDESTINUM L. Sp. pl. 58 (1753). P. pedunculatum Torr. Fl. U.S. 141 (1824). Culms erect from a short rootstock, often covering many square feet, 1o6-—3° high; stem glabrous or nearly so above, papil- losehispid below. Sheaths of primary stem one-half as long as the joints or more, the iower ones papillose-his- pid, the upper glabrous, the panicle long-peduncled ; sheaths on the branches much crowded and overlapping, papillose-hispid, concealing the small panicles; ligule none. Largest leaves I’ broad, 3—S long, cordate at 30 JOURNAL OF THE base, taper-pointed, glabrous except the rough margins, 9—13-nerved, those on the branches much smaller. Panicle 3—S long, oval, the numerous branches spread- ing, many-flowered ; spikelets 14” long, elliptical. Very common near the banks of streams. Related to P. scabriuscu- lum. Torrey’s P. pedunculatum represents the early form. New York: Ashe: Watkins, Jigy, 1898. Florida: Chapman; Apalachicola. Missouri: egert: St. Louis, 1897, Michigan: Sartwell; De- troit, 1892. North Carolina: Ashe; Wilmington, 1894, 5) PANICUM COMMUTATUM Schultes, Mant. 2: 24 (1824). FP. nervosum Ell. Sk. 1:122, Not Lam. VP. ner- vosum Muhl. refers to another plant. Cuims somewhat clustered, erect or ascending, often somewhat purplish, smooth and glabrous. Sheaths, short, glabrous except the villous margin; ligule a mere margin. Basal leaves lanceolate or broader, glabrous; stem leaves spreading, lax, lanceolate, scarcely narrowed at the ciliate, cordate base, 23’—33’ long, 6’’—3’’ wide, glabrous on both sur- faces. Panicle variable, 1’—3’ long, ovate, the branches fascicled, at length spreading; spikelets elliptical or obovate, 14’ long, somewhat pubescent. Shady woods.—Very common.—Closely related to P. Joori and P. Manatense. Connecticut: Eames; Bridgeport, 1897. New York: Ashe; Ithaca, 1898. Missouri: Stewart Weller, 1894. Florida: Curtiss, 1894, No. 4636. 6) Panicum Joori Vasey, Contrib. U. S. Nat. Herb. III, 1:31 (1891). Culms tufted, ascending or prostrate, much branched from the base upwards, 8’—19’ long. Sheaths loose, often as long as the internodes, glabrous except the ciliate margins; ligule a mere margin. Leaves very numerous, lanceolate or broader, taper-point- ed, narrowed to the cordate, sparingly ciliate base, other- wise glabrous, 7—9-nerved ; later leaves much smaller. Panicle small, 1’—2’ long, nearly sessile or partly includ- ed in the upper sheath, oblong ; spikelets very long pedi- celled, 14’’ long, elliptical, acute, glabrous. Closely related to P. commutatum, and P. Manatense. Missouri, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 31 Tennessee and southward. Missouri: Bush, July, 1895, No. 748. Tennessee: Biltmore Herbarium; Rutherford Co. No. 2984a. Louisiana: Joor. Mississippi: Tracy, 1891. 7) PANICUM.MANATENSE Nash, Torr. Bul. 24 42 (1897). Stems tufted, glabrous, ascending or decumbent, soon much branched above. Lower sheaths shorter than the internodes, loose ; upper crowded; ligule a mere mar- gin. Leaves lanceolate 2’—33’ long, 5’’—7” wide, taper- pointed, cordate at the ciliate base. Primary panicle long-peduncled, 2’—3’ long, broadly ovate, spikelets acute, elliptical, about 1}’’ long, first scale one-third the © length of the 7—9-neryed second and third. Whole plant dark green in color. With the foliage and general appearance of P. commutatum it is distinguished from it by having larger acute spikelets, and a decum- bent habit. Florida: Nash; Manatee Co., 1895, No. 2428a. 8). PANICUM XANTHOPHYSUM A. Gray, Ann. Lyc. N. Fas: 433(4835).,- Culms... cenerally single,,erect,. w= branched, forming no late, fascicled branches. Sheaths with a few ascending, stiff, papillose hairs; ligule a mere margin. Leaves ascending, or erect, glabrous, 4’—6’ long, 5’’—7”’ wide, lanceolate, narrowed to the rounded base, 5—7-nerved. Panicle long-peduncled, very nar- row, the few, single branches appressed; spikelets very few, short-pedicelled, 14’’ lone, obovate, first scale near- ly one haif as long as the 7—9-nerved second and third. Plant light green, resembling P. calliphyllum in color and habit. Maine to Manitoba, south to Pennsylvania. Description based on ma- terial collected by the writer in central New York, July, 1898; and the material in the Gray Herbarum; and from Maine: Merrill, 1897. 9) PANICUM CALLIPHYLLUM Ashe, sp. nov. Stems single or few together, erect, remaining entirely simple, elabrous. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, glabrous except the ciliate margin. Leaves ascending, 3’—4’ long, 4’’—6”’ wide, lanceolate, taper-pointed, narrowed to the rounded, ciliate base, otherwise glabrous, 7—9-nerved; basal leaves few and small. Panicle sessile or short-pe- 32 JOURNAL OF THE duncled, 2’—3’ long, the few-fiowered branches ascend- ing; Spikelets 1}’’ to 14” long, obovate, the slender ped- icels two to many times their length. Dry soil, central New York. Plant light green, drying yellowish. Closely resembling P. xanthophysum to which it is related. Type ma- terial collected by the writer at Watkins, Lake Seneca, N. Y., Aug. 1898. It has also been collected by Prof. W. W. Rowlee: East Schroeppel, N. Y., June 1895. 10) PANICUM SCABRIUSCULUM E)lliott,Sk. 1:121(1817). | P. Neaileyi Vasey. Culms forming large tufts, erect, 24 feet high, at first simple, at length much branched at each joint; stem glabrous. Lower sheaths generally spotted with purple, often papillose-hirsute or villous, the upper sheaths of the primary stem @labrous and dis- tant; secondary sheaths papillose-hirsute and overlap- ping; ligule pilose ;;nedes sometimes barbed. Leaves ascending, linear-lanceolate, about 6’’ wide, 4+’—7’ long, the numerous branches ascending or spreading; spike- lets very numerous, 1’’—1}°’ long, elliptical-ovate or ovate, acute, glabrous; secondary panicles concealed within the sheaths. The affinity of this species is with P. clandestinum, Ditches and sun- ny swamps, southeastern Virginia to Texas. Not common. Vir- ginia: Ashe; Norfolk, 1897. North Carolina: Ashe; Moore Co. 1897. Texas: Nealley, 1892. 11) Panicum scopartum Lam. Encl. 7: 744(1797). Culms single or a few together, erect, strict, columnar, often purplish, papillose-hirsute. Sheaths papillose- pubescent, the pubescence harsh, the upper overlapping ;- ligule pilose. Lower leaves distant, the upper approxi- mate, 2’—4’ long, 5’’—7’”’ wide, firm, spreading, smooth above, beneath soft-pubescent. Panicle 2’—3° long, the few branches solitary, at length spreading, 1—4-flow- ered. The affinity of this species is with P. Scribnerianum. Virginia: Small and Heller; Danville, June, 1892. North Carolina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, 1897. South Carolina: Ravenel; Aiken. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 33 12) PANICUM MALACOPHYLLUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 24: 198, (1897). Stems somewhat tufted, erect, simple, at length much branched; sheaths rather loose, papillose- hirsute with spreading hairs; ligule a ring of short hairs; nodes barbed. Leaves narrowly lanceolate, acuminate, narrowed to the rounded base, soft-pubescent, the lare- est about 3’ long, and 5” wide, 7—nerved. , Panicle nearly sessile, the branches Hexous, spreading, bearing a few short-pedicelled spikelets ; spikelets about 1}”" long, obovate, acute, the first scale over one third as long as the very pubescent 9-nerved second and third. Related to P. Scribnerianum from which it is separated by its soft pubescence, somewhat smaller spikelets, and more slender habit.— Middle Tennessee to Indian Territory.--Indian Territory: Bush; Sap- ulpa, May 1895. No. 1228. 13) PANICUM MALACON Nash, Torr. Bul. 24: 197 (1897). Stems very slender, tufted, erect, columnar, smoothish, 16’—24 high. Sheaths much shorter than the internodes, the lower smooth, the upper papillose- hispid with ascending hairs; ligule pilose. Leaves distant, spreading or ascending, rigid, g@laprous or somewhat ciliate at the base, shorter than the internodes, oblong lanceolate, acuminate, narrowed or somewhat rounded at the base, 2}’—4’ long, 3’’—4’’ wide, 7—-nerved. Panicle sometimes much exserted, 2’—3’ long, theslender, scat- tered, few-flowered branches erect or ascending. Pedi- cels two to many times the length of the spikelets; spikelets glabrous, broadly obovate, acutish, 15’’—2” lone, the first scale 1—-nerved,. one-third the length of the 9—-nerved second and third. Later stages somewhat fas- ciculately branched above, the leaves a little smaller, than the primary ones and panicles barely exserted. Dry soil Florida. Related to P. scoparium.,, Florida: Curtiss; Jacksonville, Apr. 1897. No. 5864. 14) PANICUM LIEBERGII (Vasey) Scribu. Bul. U. S, 3 ‘ 34 JOURNAL OF THE Div. Bot. 8: 32 (1889). P. scoparium Lam, var. Lieber- gw Vasey, 1. c. Culms single or few together, erect, 1—2 feet high, at first simple, at length much branched above, more or less pubescent with spreading hairs. Sheaths papillose-hirsute, the hairs spreading; ligule hairy. Leaves lanceolate, the largest 3’—4’ long, 4’’—5”’ wide, rounded at the base, erect, papillose-hispid beneath, above generally glabrous. Panicle narrow, about 3’ long, the flexuous branches erect or ascending. Spikelets obovate 1%”’ long, the first scale nearly one-half as long as the pubescent second and third. Very closely related to P. Scribnerianum. Dry soil. According to Britton and Brown extending from Minnesota and South Dakota to Nebraska, Missouri and Ohio. Iowa: Pammell, 1896. 15) PANICUM SCRIBNERIANUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 22: 421 (1895). FP. scoparium var. minor Scribn. (1894). Not P. capillare var. minus Muhl. P. pauciflorum A. Gray (1848). Not Ell. (1817). BP. scoparium Watson Sixth Ed. Gr. Man. 632 (1889). Not Lam. Encl. 4:743 (1797). Culms 8’—20’ high, tufted, erect, at first colum- nar, at length much branched above. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, from nearly glabrous, especially in the northern forms, to papillose-hispid, the pubescence ascending; nodes not barbed. Leaves spreading or ascend- ing , lanceolate, 2’—33’ long, 3’”’—5”’ wide, rounded at the base, smooth above, glabrous or rough beneath. Panicle 2’-—3’ long, broadly oval, branches rather many-flowered; spikelets obovate, 15” long. Most closely related to P. Liebergit, and P. scoparium, and P. malaco- phyllum. Dry soil, North Carolinaand Tennessee to Wyoming, east to Ontario and Maine. North Carolina: Ashe; Raleigh, July, 1895, Tennessee: Ruth; Knoxville; 1897. Missouri: Bush; 1894, No, 729. Wyoming: Nelson ; 1894, No. 516, 16) PANICUM EQUILATERALE Scribn. Bul. 11, U. S. Div. of Agrost. 42 (1898). Stems somewhat tufted froma generally geniculate base, glabrous. Sheaths short and ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 35 glabrous; ligule a mere margin. Leaves 4’—6’ long, '3’’°—4”’ wide, oblong-lanceolate, glabrous, abruptly acu- minate. Panicle 2’—3’ long,oval, branches spreading, rath- er many-flowered; spikelets elliptical to obovate, 13’’ long; first scale acute, fully one-half as long as the pubescent 9-nerved secondand third, fourth scale acute. Related to P. Ashei, but the leaves are much longer than? those of that plant, while the spikelets areas long asin P. Porterianum. Flor- ida: Baldwin; Fort George. Florida: Nash; Eustis, 1894, Nos. 1220 and 1674. 17) Panicum ASHEI, Gilbert Pearson, sp. nov. P. commutatum Schultes var. minor Vasey, Contrib. from U. S, Nat. Herb., vol..3, No. I: 32 (1892). Not P. capit- lare var. minus Muhl. (1817). Culm erect, strict, single or a few together from a short root-stock, very slender, glabrous, 11’—18’ high. Sheaths glab- rous, the lower very short; ligule none. Stem leaves rigid, spreading, lanceolate, 13’—3’ long, 3’’—4’’ wide, taper- pointed, scarcely narrowed at the ciliate base, glabrous on both sides, the lowest distant, the upper approximate, Panicle 2’ long or less, oval, the few branches spreading ; spikelets 1}’’ long, elliptic, nearly glabrous. The autum- nal form is sparingly branched above. Common.—This species is closely related to P. commutatum from which itis separated by its slender, strict habit, more narrow, rigid and spreading leaves approximate atthe topof the culm. Dry shady woods, New York to Georgia and Missouri. New York: Ashe; Ithaca, July 1898. North Carolina: Ashe; near Wilmington, June 1898. Missouri: Bush; Aug. 12, 1892, sub. nom. P. dichotomum, L. 18) Panicum WEBBERIANUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 23: 149 (1896). Stems tufted, erect or ascending, 18’—24’ high, smooth except below, where minutely puberulent. Sheaths smooth, except the ciliate margin, or sometimes puberulent, inflated, shorter than the internodes; ligulea mere ciliate margin. Leaves erect or ascending, lanceo- late, narrowed to a rounded base, 2’—3’ long, 3’’—4”’ wide, 7—11-nerved, glabrous or the base, sparingly cili- 36 JOURNAL OF THE ate, generally purplish, very numerous. Panicle 2’—4’ long, one half as wide, the slender, mostly single branches spreading; spikelets obovate, apiculate, 14°’ long, on pedicels of about the same length or longer, first scale obtuse, about one-fourth the length of the 7-nerved sec- ond and third. Low pine land. Florida: Nash; Lake Co., May, 1894, No. 781. Re- lated to P. demissum 'Trin. but larger in every way and erect, where- as that is ascending from a geniculate base or is prostrate. 19) PANICUM /‘JILCOXIANUM Vasey, Bul. U. S. Div. of Bot. 8: 32 (1889). Culms somewhat tufted, erect, about 8’ high, pubescent, at least below. Sheaths short- er than the internodes, papillose-pubescent with rough, appressed or ascending hairs ; ligule pilose. Leaves in the simple form not crowded, ascending, nearly lanceolate, the largest about 3’ long, 2’’ wide, narrowed to the some- what rounded base, pubescent. Panicle long-peduncled, 1’—13’ long, ovoid, compact, the branches ascending; spikelets broadly elliptical, 1}’’ long, pubescent. Dry, sandy soil, Nebraska. Type material collected by Dr. Wilcox in 1891. Closely related to P. Scribnerianum. 20) PANICUM GEORGIANUM Ashe, sp. nov. Low, 4’—8’ high, densely tufted, much branched. below and spreading, even before flowering; stems glabrous or soft- pubescent. Sheaths generally longer than the internodes, soft-pubescent or nearly glabrous; ligule witha few soft hairs. ULeaves ascending, oblong lanceolate, 1’4-2° long, about 2’’ wide, taper-pointed, rounded at the base, 5—7- nerved, soft-pubescent or glabrate. Panicle short-pedun- cled, one inch long or less, generally overtopped by the upper leaves, the few, short branches ascending; spikelets, 1z”’ long, broadly elliptical, the first scale obtuse, one- third the length of the very pubescent second and third. Dry sandy soil, southern Georgia and Florida. Related to P. consan- guineum. Georgia: Small; Darden Junction, McIntosh Co., June 27, 1895. Florida: Chapman; Apalachicola. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. Ry 21) PaANICUM POLYANTHES Schultes, Mant. 2:257 (1824). P. multiforum Ell. Sk. 1:122 (1817). Not Poir (1816). P. microcarpon Muhl. Gram. 111 (June 1817.) Not Muhl. ex Elliott (Jan. 1817). Culms often single, erect or nearly so,16’—30’ high, glabrous. Sheaths glabrous, gen- erally longer than the internodes and overlapping; ligule none. Leaves ascending, scattered along the entire stem, lanceolate, 3’-6’ long, 6’’—10”’ wide, taper-pointed, glab- rous except at the ciliate, cordate base ; basal leaves ros- ulate, ovate-lanceolate, rigid. Panicle oblong or ellipti- cal, pointed, 3’—5’ long, branches fasciculate, the lower ascending. Spikelets very numerous, nearly }’’ long, broadly elliptical or sphevoid; first scale small, one-fourth the length of the pubescent 7-nerved second and third. Moist, shady woods, not common, Florida, Texas aud Indian Terri- tory northward to Michigan and Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania: C E. Smith, Chester. Missouri: Stewart Weller, 1892. Georgia: Ashe; Albany, 1896. District of Columbia: Holm: 1896, 22) PANICUM SPHAEROCARPON Ell. Sk.1: 125 (1817). Stems sometimes tufted, erect or ascending 12’—28’ long, glabrous. Sheaths glabrous (or sometimes the low- er nodes slightly barbed), the lower longer than the in- ternodes and overlapping; ligule none. Leaves ascend- ing, lanceolate, 2’—23’ long, 4’’—5’’ wide, long taper- pointed, ciliate at the barely rounded base, about 7-nerv- ed. Panicle long-peduncled, oval 2’—3’ long, the fasci- cled branches somewhat ascending; spikelets obovate or nearly spherical, {’’ long. Common in old fields and sunny woods, New Englandand Ontario to Missouri, Mexico (fide Vasey) and Florida. New York: Townsend; Niagara, 1894. Missouri: Bush; Montier, 1894, No. 763. Georgia: Small; Stone Mt. 1895. Illinois: Hill; Chicago, 1898. 23) PANICUM ERECTIFOLIUM Nash, Tor. Bul. 23: 148 (1897). P. spaerocarpon var. Floridanum Vasey, Bul. U. S. Div. of Bot. 8:33 (1889). Not P. Floridanum 38 JOURNAL OF THE Trin. (1834) P. spaerocarpon Ell. ex Chapm. Flora. First Ed. 576. Culms tufted, erect or ascending, 14’—24’ high, rather stout, glabrous. Sheaths glabrous, lower generally longer than the internodes; no ligule. Leaves thick, erect, rigid, lanceolate or narrower, 2’—3’ long, 4’’—6”’ wide, taper-pointed, rounded at the ciliate base, otherwise glabrous. Panicle 15’—3’ long, oval or oblong, branches fascicled, the lower ascending. Spike- lets numerous, very small, scarcely 3’’ long, spherical. Distinguished from P. sphaerocarpon by .having narrower, erect leaves, and smaller spikelets. Northern Florida and probably the ad- jacent parts of Georgia. Florida: Curtiss; Jacksonville, 1894, No. 4812. 24) Panicum Appisonii Nash, Torr. Bul. 25: 83 (1898). ‘Tufted, stems erect or ascending froma genicu- late base, rigid. At first simple, at length much branch- ed, the branches erect, the lower part of the stem pu- bescent with long ascending hairs which become much shorter towards the top. Sheaths appressed pubescent, sometimes longer than the internodes. Leaves erect, glab- rous, acuminate, lanceolate, 1’—3’ long, 135’’—3’’ wide; ligule pilose. Panicle, long-peduncled, ovate to oblong, the rather few branches erect or ascending; spikelets ob- ovate, 1’’ long, the first scale about one half as long as the 9—11-nerved, very pubescent second and third. Type material from southern New Jersey. Related to P. con- sanguineum,. Ihave found the same species in eastern North Carolina. 25) PANICUM CONSANGUINEUM Kth. Enum. Pl. 1: 106 (1833). Stems sometimes tufted, generally single, vil- lous with soft spreading or ascending hairs, at least be- low, 12’—30’ long, spreading or ascending from a genic- ulate base, at first simple, the autumnal form very much branched above, and often reclining. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, villous with soft grayish pubescence, liguie a ring of very short hairs, sometimes of longer. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 39 Stem leaves erect, oblong-lanceolate, the largest near the middle of the stem, 2’—33’ long, 2’’—4’’ wide, about equalling the internodes, thickish, smooth to villous; the later leaves smooth and much smaller, densely fasci- cled at the upper part of the stem. Panicle long-pedun- cled, 2’——-3’ long, the few long, flexuous branches ascend- ing, few-flowered. Spikelets 14’’ long, broadly obovate, obtuse, abruptly contracted at the base, the second and third scales strongly 7—9-nerved, very pubescent. Virginia: Ashe; June, 1897. North Carolina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, 1896. Florida : Curtiss. P. oligosanthes Schult. and P. Ra finesqui- anum Schult. are probably referable to this species. 26) PANICUM NEURANTHUM Griseb. Cat. Pl. Cub. 532 (1866). Culms somewhat clustered, at first simple, erect or ascending, 8’—20’ long, at length very much branched above and reclining or spreading, glabrous or somewhat pubescent. Sheaths shorter than the inter- nodes, the lower pubescent, the upper smooth, those of the fascicled secondary branches much crowded; ligule pubescent. Earlier leaves erect, flat, glabrous, linear- lanceolate, the largest 3’—4’ long, 2’’—23’’ wide, nar- rowed at the base, longer than the internodes ; the later crowded, smaller, linear, ascending on the spreading or reclining branches, often involute, very much longer than the small, barely exserted panicles. Primary panicle oblong, 3’—4’ long, glabrous, the branches at first as- cending, at length spreading, the rather few large flow- ers borne mostly on long flexuous pedicels ; spikelets about 1’ long, broadly obovate. Dry sandy soil along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts from Virginia southward. ‘This species is apparently very close to P. consanguineum. I have only been able to examine Curtiss’ 3587,* which has been referr- ed by Nash to this species, and this being in the autumnal state, is rather unsatisfactory for comparision. 27) PANICUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM Ejll., Sk. 1:129(1817), P. setaceum Muhl. Gram. (1817). Stems generally sin- 40 JOURNAL OF THE ele, at first simple and erect, later much branched, spreading or reclining, glabrous, or below somewhat pubescent. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, the lowest generally pubescent, the upper smooth. Primary leaves erect, flat, glabrous, linear-lanceolate, the largest 3°—4’ long, 2’’—23”’ wide, narrowed at the base, secon- dary leaves much smaller and crowded at the top of the ascending or reclining branches. Primary panicle ob- long, 3’—4’ long, glabrous, the branches at first erect, at length spreading, the flowers on long flexuous pedicels, spikelets 1°’ long, or over, elliptic, acute, abruptly con- tracted at the base. Dry sandy soil from eastern Virginia southward to Texas. Mary- land: Canby, 1894. Florida: Nash; Eustice, 1894. Mississippi : Kearney ; Biloxi, 1896, Texas: Reverchon; Dallas, 1881, sub. nom. P. neuranthum. 28) Panicum BICKNELLI Nash, Torr, Bul. 24:193 (1897). Culms tufted erect. slender. smooth above, pub- erulent below, a foot or more tall. Sheaths often longer than the internodes, the lower pubescent with the nodes bearded ; ligule pubescent. Stem leaves linear-lanceo- late, narrowed at the ciliate base, otherwise smooth, the largest 5’—8’ long, 4’’—5"’ wide, the upper ones longest. Panicle 2?—4 long, with ascending, flexnous branches; spikelets obtuse, oval or obovate, about 15’’ long, second and third scales 9-nerved. Secondary panicles much smaller, on erect branches, and not basal as in P. depau- peratum. This species has the habit and appearance of P. depauperatum, from which it is separated by having much broader leaves and smaller spikelets. New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Porter; Penn- sylvania; Chambersburg, July, 1896. 29) PANICUM DEPAUPERATUM Muh]. Gram. 112 (1817). -P. sérictum Pursh FI, (1814). Not R. Br. (1812). P. rectum R.& SS. P. involutum 'Torr. Stems tufted, - 8-18" high erect, mostly glabrous. Upper sheaths elon- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 41 gated, glabrous or hirsute; ligule hairy. Stem leaves erect, longest towards top of culm, 3’ te 8’ long, 13’’—2”’ wide, smocth or hirsute,.sometimes involute; basal leaves ‘similar to those of the stem’ but shorter. Panicle loose, 3’—5’ long, branches erect or astending, mostly single, flexuous, few-flowered, pedicels mostly very long ; spike- lets i}’’—23” long. broadly elliptical or obovate, acute, the 8-nerved. second and third scales much longer than the obtuse fourth. Elliott does not seem to nave known this species. Throughout the eastern United States from Maine and Florida to Texas. Dry; sgndy woods and fields. Washington, D. C.: Holm, 1895. Iowa: Bessey; Ames, 1872. Georgia: Ashe; Stone Mountain, 1896 Texas: Reverchon. New Hampshire: Haton; Seabrook, 1898. 30) . PANICUM LINEARIFOLIUM Scribn. Bul. 11, U.S. Div. of Avrost. 42 (1898). Densely tufted, 8’—14’ high, stems erect, smooth. Sheaths somewhat shorter than the internodes, usually hirsute; ligule hairy. Leaves linear—lanceolate, erect, firm, 2’—6’ long, 13’’—2°’ wide, the base barely narrowed, glabrous above, or with a few loug hairs. below appressed pubescent. Primary pazicle open, 2’—# jong, the mostly single branches ascending, the rather few spikelets borne on pedicels two to many times their length. Spikelets elliptical, obtuse, 1’’ or slightly more long, very strongly 7-uerved. Secondary panicles crowded at base of the culms. Maine and New Jersey to Minnesota and Missouri. Distinguished from /. depauperatum by having inore slender, obtuse spikelets ; while its somewhat longer, more elliptical spikelets, its pubescence and the basal panicles separate it from 7. Wernert. Minnnesota ; Holzinger; June, 1888. Maine; Merrill; July, 1898. Illinois; Hall; 1862. Missouri: Bush, 1892. 31) Panicum WERNERI Scribn. Brit. and Brown’s Ill, Flo. 3; 501(1898). Densely tufted, stems very slen- der, smooth and glabrous throughout. Sheaths smooth, ligule amere margin. Leaves linear, erect, often over-_ topping the panicles, the upper leaves the longest, 3’—7’ 42 JOURNAL OF THE -leng, 1°’—2”’ wide, glabrous. Panicles long-peduncled, 2’—4’ long, loose, the slender flexuous, generally solita- ry branches ascending ; spikelets about 1’’ long, obovate, the first scale about one third the length of the 7-nerved second and third. Setondary basal panicles only spar- ingly developed. Very close to P. lineartfolium. Connecticut to Ohio in swamps. Connecticut: Eames; Fairfield, 1896. New York; Rowlee; Ithaca, 1892. . 32) PANICUM NEMOPANTHUM Ashe, sp. nov. Tuft- ed, stems erect, 14’—20’ high, glabrous. Sheaths glab- rous, or the lowest pubescent, the upper sofnetimes longer than internodes, the nodes, atleast the lower ones, barbed with long hairs; ligule none. Leaves linear lan- ceolate, spreading or ascending, long taper-pointed, — glabrous or ciliate toward the narrowed base. Panicle 3’—4’ long, broader than long, the mostly single branch- es wide-spreading, lax and drooping, few-flowered ; spikelets elliptic, acute, nearly 15’’ long, on long, flexu- ous pedicels, the obtuse first scale over one-third the length of the glabrous, 7-nerved second and third. Type material collected by the writer April, 1895, in the Penitentia- ry woods, Raleigh, N. C. A very distinct species. 33) PaNnicUM DICHOTOMUM L, Sp. PI. 58 (1753). P. ramulosum Mx. P. nodifiorum Lam.? Several stems to- gether, 10’ -- 24’ high, erect. Sheaths, except the low- est, glabrous, lowest node occasionally barbed and its sheath pubescent. Sheaths shorter than the internodes; ligule none. Leaves spreading, lax, largest 13’—23’ long, 3’’-—4’’ wide, narrowed toa rounded, sparingly cil- iate base, otherwise glabrous. Primary panicle 2’ or more long, oval, the branches lax; spikelets 1”’ long, el- liptic, glabrous. Shady woods throughout the eastern United States north of Florida and Texas. Florida: Chapman; Apalachicola. Texas: Nealley; Rock ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 43 land, 1892. New York: Rowlee; Ithaca, 1895. Maine: Fernald; 1895. This is the most comimon vernal species from North Carolina northward. Elliott seems to have overlooked this species. His P. dichotomum is either LP. demissum or P. arenicolum or some closely related species, which, in habit, resembles P. azzustifolinm, as he compares his P. di- chotomum with P. angustifolium in both habit and form. PANICUM DICHOTOMUM ELATUM Vasey Contrib. from. U.S. Nat. Herb. vol. 3 No. 1:30 (1892). Stems stouter, leaves longer, 25'—3' long, panicle very much larger than in the type, 3’—4" long and fully as wide. Maryland and southward. District of Columbia: Scribner 1894, North Carolina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, 1897. PANICUM DICHOTOMUM VIRIDE Vasey, Contrib. from U.S.Nat. Heb. Vol. 3, No. 1:30 (1892) is a tender, slend- er, few flowered form, growing in very deep Shady woods. It is very common to the northward, but is less common to the south. It does not branch or only spar- ingly during the summer, the basal nodes and sheaths are glabrous, and it is probably specific. It approaches P. lucidum. P. dichotomum has been burdened with numberless va- rieties by later American authors, most of these varieties being well-marked species, which were so regarded by early American botanists. 34) PANICUM BOREALE Nash, Torr. Bul. 22: 421(1895). Culms generally tufted, ascending or erect, 14’—20” high, glabrous. Sheaths glabrous, except for the ciliate mar- gin, often as long as the internodes; ligule of very short hairs. Leaves glabrous, lanceolate, or sometimes ciliate at the base, 3’--S’ long 3’ wide or less, taper-pointed, narrowed to the rounded base, ascending. Panicle 2’—3’ long, nearly as broad, branches numerous, fascicled, very slender; spikelets 1”’ long, elliptic, acutish, nearly olab- rous, rather numerous, on long filiform ascending or spreading pedicels. Autumnal form unbranched. 44 JOURNAL OF THE Northern New England to Minnesota, South to Pennsylvania. Relat- ed to P. dichotomum,. Maine: Merrill; East Cerbum. New York: Ashe; Courtland, 1898. 35) PANICUM MACULATUM Ashe, sp. nov. Culms single, erect, glabrous, at length sparingly branched. Sheaths shorter than internodes, glabrous, spotted ; lig- ule none. Basalleaves and nodes glabrous; stem leaves ascending, largest 3’—4’ long, 4’’—5”’’ wide, lanceolate, tapering to the rounded glabrous base, margins very rough, 5—7-nerved. Panicle 2’—3’ long, nearly as broad, oval, the clustered branches lax. Spikelets %”’ leng, obovate, acute. Related to P. dichotomum, from which distinguished by the longer, ascending leaves and smaller spikelets, Spikelets about the size of those of P. barbulatum. Collected by the writer at Raleigh, N. C. May, 1895. 36) PANICUM ROANOKENSE Ashe. sp. nov. Culms somewhat tufted, 18’ or more high from a geniculate base. Plant glabrous throughout. Sheaths oue-half as long as the internodes or more; ligule none. Leaves glabrous, ascending, narrowly lanceolate, 2’—3’ long, 2”°—3”’ wide, firm, 5—7-nerved. Panicle 2}’—33’ long, broadly oval, the siender, tascicled branches spreading or drooping ; spikelets numerous, 1’’ long, elliptical-ebo- vate, glabrous. Type material collected by writer in dry soil, Roanoke Island, N. C. June, 1898; also collected at Rose Bay and Mackleyville, N. C., the same month. 37) PANICUM DEMISSUM Trin. Sp. Gram. 3: 319 (1836), Panicum Nashianum Scrib. Bul. U.S. Div. of Agrost.7: 79 (1897). Stems tufted, 118’ long, very slender, wiry, risingor reclining from geniculate base, joints geniculate, purplish, glabrous or minutely rough, puberulent below, at first simple, becoming much branch- ed above late in the season. Sheaths much shorter than the internodes, the upper ones glabrous, the lower gen- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 45 erally puberulent ; ligule none. Leaves ascending, oblong- lanceolate, 13’ leng or less, about 2’’ wide, 1’ longestand broadest near the base of the culm, the upper reduced in size, glabrous. Panicle short-peduncled or sessile, l’—2’ lone, the branches short, flexuous, spreading; spike- lets obovate, 1’" long, contracted at the base, glabrous. Related to P. Webberianum, but distinguished by being much smaller and ascending from a geniculate base. Common in the pine barrens. North Carolina; Ashe; near Newberne, 1898. Georgia ; Small; near Thomasville, June, 1892. Florida; Curtiss ; Jacksonville, No. 4637, 1894, 38) PAnicuM MATTAMUSKETENSE Ashe, sp. nov. Krect, sometimes tufted, strict, rather stout, 2 feet to 4 feet high, often purplish, nodes strongly barbed. Low- er leaves and sheaths soft-pubescent the upper glabrous; ligule pubescent, otherwise glabrous. Leaves lanceolate. 3’—5’ long, 4”—7” wide, spreading. Panicle 3’--5’ long, ovoid, long-peduncled, the branches numerous, cluster- ed; spikelets ellipsoid, glabrous, pointed, 1” long, first scale one-third the length of the spikelet. Roadsides, ditch banks and wet open woods around lake Mattamus- keet, N. C., where it grows with /. darbulatum. JuneandJuly. The later stages profusely branched above with shorter leaves and small few-flowered panicles. Collected by the writer, and Mr. Gilbert Pear- son in June, 1898. . 39) PANICUM BARBULATUM Mx. Flora, 1:49(1803). P. discolor Spreng, ex Muhl. Gram. 1141818). P. het- erophyllum Schreb? Stems erect, often tufted, 2 feet to 3 feet high, the nodes barbed, otherwise glabrous. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, glabrous; ligule pubescent. Leaves spreading or ascending, lanceolate, rounded at the base, 3’—4’ long, 3’’—6”’ wide. Panicle 3’—5’ long, ovoid, peduncled, the branches fascicled, numerous; spikelets ellipseid about %’’ or less long, pointed. The later stage very much branched above, with smaller leaves and small, few-flowered panicles. 46 JOURNAL OF THE a Wet shady places, very common. Florida and Texas to (according to Britton & Brown) Ohio and Connecticut. Texas: Nealley; No, 26. Florida: Chapman; Apalachicola, Biltmore Herbarium, No. 803c. District of Columbia: Kearney, 1895. Kentucky: Miss Price; Bow- ling Green. This species has the general appearance of P. dichotomum, but is distinguished by the smaller spikelets and barbed nodes. Near- ly related to P, annulum and P. Mattamusketense. 40) PANICUM ENSIFOLIUM Baldwin, Ell. Sk. 1:526 (1817). P. albo-marginatum Nash, Torr. Bal. 24:40 (1897). Stems tufted, branching from the base or near it, glabrous, 8’—14’ high. Sheaths generally much shorter than the internodes, crowded on the branches above, glabrous, except the very short, hairy ligule. Leaves glabrous, lanceolate, mostly clustered near the base of the stem, the largest 14’—2’ long, 3’’—4’’ wide, the margins white and thickened, upper reduced in size. Panicles small, 1’—1}’ long, long-exserted, oval, the branches ascending; spikelets numerous, }’’ long, ellip- tical-obovate, the first scale about one- Foul as long as the pubescent 7—nerved second and third. Moist or dry woods middle North Carolina to Florida. North Caro- lina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, June, 1896. Georgia: Baldwin. Florida: Nash; Lake county, 1894, No. 925. A specimen in the herbarium of the Philadelphia Academy of Science sent by Baldwin from Georgia, and labelled by him P. ensifolium, matches my material from North Carolina and Nash’s from Florida. It also agrees very well with Elliott’s description of this species. 41) Panicum BaLpwini Nutt. ex Gunitaat Flora, 3rd edition 586 (1896). Densely cespitose, glabrous, stems much branched near the base, low 8’—16’ high, stiff ana rigid. Sheaths smooth: ligule pubescent. Stem leaves rigid, erect, narrowed at base, x —-13’ long, acuminate, glabrous. Basal leaves tufted. Panicle 1’ or less long, much divided ; the obovate or elliptic spike- lets barely 3’’ long, the second and third scales indis- tinctly 5—nerved. Georgia: Baldwin, in Herb. Philadelphia Acad. of Natural Science. Florida: Curtiss ;Indian river, No. 5804, Florida: Chapman; Apa- lachicola. Related to the next. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 47 42) Panicum WRIGHTIANUM Scribn., Bul. 11, U.S. Div. of Agrost., 44 (1898). Stems densely tufted, much branched above, sometimes puberulent. Sheaths very short, occasionally pubescent; ligule sometimes pubes- cent. Leaves lanceolate, somewhat rounded at the base, 1’—2’ long, erect, glabrous, taper-pointed. Panicle ob- long, 37-13’ long, branches fascicled, short; spikelets obovate, less than $” long, second and third scales faint- ly 5-nerved. Florida and westward along the South Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Florida: Nash; Lake county, 1894, No. 1238. Florida: Curtiss; Jack- sonville, 1894, No. 5588. North Carolina: Ashe; near Newberne, 1898. 43) PANICUM SPHAGNICOLUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 22: 422 (1895), Cespitose, stems at first erect, soon reclin- ing and much elongated, 12’—30’ long, very slender, olabrous. Sheaths much shorter than the internodes, olabrous, no ligule. Leaves erect, 3’—1 3’ long, 2”—3’ wide, narrowly lanceolate, narrowed to the somewhat rounded base, glabrous, 5-nerved. Panicles 1’—1%’ long, branches erect, or ascending; spikelets ;” long, broad- ly obovate, glabrous, the second and third scales 7-nerved. Delaware to Florida and Tennessee. At first unbranched, eventual- ly with slender, reclining branches and small, sessile panicles. Color light green. Delaware : Canby ; Ogleton, June, 1896. District of Columbia: Kearney ; June, 1897. North Carolina: Small; Duns’ Mt., August, 1894. North Carolina; Biltmore Herbarium, Biltmore, August, 1898 No. 5066b. Florida; Nash, No. 2500. 44) Panicum LucIDUM Ashe, sp. nov. Cespitose, culms reclining or prostrate, weak, glabrous. Sheaths glab- rous, except the ciliate margin, very short; ligule none. Leaves spreading, 1’ long or generally less, narrowly lanceolate, very acute, narrowed to the base, glabrous, rather distant. Panicle peduncled, 15’ long or less, equally as wide, the branches single or several together, 48 JOURNAL OF THE wide-spreading; spikelets about 3’’ long, elliptic or nar- rowly obovate, acute, giabrous. Coilected in June 1898 by the writer in deep, shady swamps border- ing lake Mattamuskeet, N. C. Probabiy found in other swamps along the coast of the southern states. Very different from P. sphagnicolum. 45 PANICUM CUTHBERTI Ashe, sp. nov. Culms very slender, erect or spreading, deusely tufted, glabrous, 8’— 24’ long, the autumnal state unbranched or slightly so. Sheaths very short, glabrous; no ligule. Stem leaves distant, narrowly lanceolate, taper-pointed, 3 to 5 ner- ved, narrowed at the base, thin, glabrous, $’—13’ long, 1’’—2”’ wide, spreading or ascending; basal leaves densely tufted. Panicle broadly oval about 1’ long, the slender branches spreading; spikelets narrowly elliptical, acute, 5°’ leng, the first scale one-fourth the length of the 7-ner- ved finely pubescent second and third. Wet sandy woeds, North Carolina and South Carolina. South Car- olina: Cuthbert; St. Helena island. North Carolina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, June,1898. Itis separated from /. ensi/olium by the strict habit and arge basal leaves of the lattcr; while P. sphagnicolum hasthe branches of its panicle ascending and larger obovate spikelets; and P. lucidum has much larger and broader spikelets, and a decumbent habit. 46) PANICUM PARVISPICULATUM Nash, Torr. Bul.24:347 (1897.) P. microcarpon(?) Muhl. ex Ell. Sk. 1:127 (1817). Stems tufted, erect, 8’—30’ high, glabrous, or with some appressed pubescence on the lower part and sometimes with the nodes barbed. Sheaths very short, generally glabrous, the lower sometimes pubescent; ligule short, pilose. Leav»s distant, ascending, much shorter than the internodes, lanceolate, narrowed at the base, 2’—3’ long, 3’’°—4’’ wide, generally glabrous. Basal leaves oblong lanceolate, 2’--4’ long, about 4’’ wide, stiff and erect. Panicle 15’-—3’ long, oval or oblong,the numerous ascend- ing branches thickly fascicled; spikelets very numerous, small, scarcely 3°’ long, broadly oval. This species is intermediate between /. leucothrix Nash. and P. niti- — — \ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 49 dum Yam., and is the P. nitidum of Dr. Chapman’s Southern Flora. It is also probably the P. microcarpon of Elliott. It occurs along the coast as far north as eastern Virginia. As it is variable in the amount of pubescence, some specimens being quite glabrous, and others hav- ing the stems and sheaths pubescent, and nodes barbed, ‘it is possible that Elliott may have based his P. mtcrocarpon on specimens of the pubescent form. Virginia: Curtiss; Bedford Co., 1873, sub nom. P. nodiflorum Tam. North Carolina: Ashe; Wilmington, 1895. Florida: Chapman; Apalachicola. Curtiss, Jacksonville, No, 4033. 47) PANICUM LEUCOTHRIX Nash, Torr, Bul. 24:41 (1817). Stems somewhat tufted, slender, 12’—30’ tall, glabrous, or pubescent below. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, glabrous or the lower pubescent ; ligule pil- ose. Leaves lanceolate,13’ long or less, 1”—-2”’ wide, nar- rowed to the base, spreading or ascending. Panicle ob- long, }’—13’ long, the numerous short fascicled branches ascending ; spikelets very numerous, less than $’’ long, spheroid, whitish or purple. Central Florida to North Carolina near the coast. Florida: Curtiss; Jacksonville, 5912. North Carolina: Ashe; Manteo, June, 1898. Re- ated to P. parvispiculatum. This is Elliott’s P, nttidum. 48) Panicum Eatont Nash, Torr. Bul. 25: 84 (1898). Erect, 1’--3’ tall, glabrous. Sheaths smooth: ligule pilose. Leaves lanceolate, taper-pointed, ascend- ing, becoming much smaller towards top of culm, the largest 3’--4’ long, and 4”--5” wide: panicle long-pe- duncled, oblong, 3’--5’ long, the numerous short branch- es ascending ; spikelets oval, about 7%” long, first scale about one-third as long as the pubescent, 7-uerved sec- ond and third. “Wet places along the coast, Maine to New York.” Description based on material sent me by Mr. A. A. Katon of Seabrook, N. H. 49) Panicum ColUBIANUM Scribn. Bul. U.S. Div. of Agrost. 7: 78 (1897). Stems somewhat tufted, 8-20’ high, strict, glabrous or the lower pubescent: ligule pilose. Leaves distant, ascending, lanceolate, taper- pointed, the upper reduced in size, largest 2’--3’ long, 4 50 JOURNAL OF THE 3”—4” wide. Panicle long-peduncled, mostly smooth, 1’--2’ long, at first contracted, later pyramidal, branches numerous, fascicled; spikelets broadly ovate, }” long purplish, first scale minute, second and third 7-nerved, pubescent. Later stages fasciculate branched, the small branches and leaves ascending. Too close to P. nitidum, from which it is distinguished only by its smaller size, and smaller panicle. New Jersey: Commons; 1897. District of Columbia: Kearney ; June, 1897. 50) PANICUM NITIDUM Lam. Encl. 4; 748 (1797). Stems often tufted, erect, strict, 10’ to 34 feet high, near- ly glabrous; later stages much branched, from the sheaths. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, glabrous or with soft ascending hairs, or, to the southward, the lower sheaths papillose-hirsute; ligule pilose. Leaves firm, ascending, 7—-9-nerved, oblong-lanceolate, 2’--4 long, 3”--4” wide, glabrous, or appressed pubes- cent beneath, shorter than the internodes; upper much reduced. Panicle 2’--3’ long, broadly oval, at least the lower branches ascending, spikelets numerous, on very slender pedicels, about 7” long, broadly ovate. New England to North Carolina, and Wisconsin. Its distribution farther westward undetermined. District of Columbia: Kearney; 1897. North Carolina: Ashe ; 1898. Wisconsin: Pammel; Prairie du Chien, 1891. This is a very confusing and variable species. I have studied it in the field for three seasons and have carefully noted its variability. To the northeast, where it is common at least as far as New Jersey, it is generally glabrous or nearly so; to the southward it is often pubes- cent, with the sheaths papillose-hirsute, though the glabrous form oc- curs occasionally along with it. It is variable in size and in the shape and size of its spikelets, even on the same individual. ‘The long pilose ligule, however, is constant. To the extreme southeast P. leucothrix occurs, which is closely allied to P. mittidum, and isthe P. nitidum of Elliott. It is also very variable in its pubescence and in the size and shape of its spikelets. In the extreme west P. nitidum is represent-. ed by P. thermile Boland, a rather low, nearly glabrous species ; while closely allied to it is a very villous form with larger, narrower spike- lets, which seems to be specific. Its description follows: ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 51 51) PANICUM HUACHUCAE Ashe, sp. nov. Stems somewhat clustered, erect, slender, villous, 2 feet to 3 feet high. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, villous to papilose-hirsute ; ligule long-pilose. Leaves erect or ascending, 3’--4’ long, 3’—-4” wide, generally villous, ob- long-lanceolate. Panicle 3’—5’ long, oval, pubescent ; ‘spikelets nearly 1” long, oval, or elliptical, pubescent. Based on: Lemnon: P. dichotomum var. nitidum, subvar. barbu- latum ; Huachuca Mountains, Arizona, 1882. North Carolina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, June, 1898. Iowa: Bessey; Ames, 1875. Delaware: Commons; sub nom., /. /anuginosum. Missouri: Glatfeller; St. Louis, 1897. 52) Panicum viscipum Ell. Sk. 1: 124(1817). P. scoparium Mx. Flora 1: 49(1803). Not Lam. (1797). Tufted, large and stout, 2 feet to 3 feet high, ascending, from a generally geniculate base; stem pilose, especially below. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, pilose on the lower part, the upper generally viscid, barbed at the nodes, with a naked viscid ring below the node; ligule of very short pubescence. Leaves 3’—5’ long, 4”—7” wide, lanceolate or narrower, narrowed to the base, glabrous above, generally pilose beneath. Panicle short-pedun- cled, 2’—4’ long, broadly oval, the numerous, fascicled branches ascending; spikelets broadly obovate or nearly spherical, 1}”’ long, apiculate; axisof panicle often viscid. Later state much branched. New Jersey to Florida and Texas. Frequent in wet or moist sandy places. Florida: Chapman, Apalachicola. Delaware: Canby, 1894, Texas: Reverchon. North Carolina: Ashe, 1897. 53) PANnIcUM CILIIFERUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 24: 195 (1897). Culms tufted, erect or ascending from a genicu- late base, the joints geniculate. 18’ -- 24 high. more or less villous below with appressed or ascending hairs, above smooth. Sheaths much shorter than the inter- nodes, villous with soft, appressed pubescence; pubes- cence of ligule very short or sometimes long and villous, 52 - JOURNAL OF THE . Stem leaves erect or ascending, long—acuminate} broadest near the somewhat rounded base, the lowest lanceolate, 27—4 long, 4”—5” wide, 9—13-nerved, the upper much reduced. Panicle pyramidal, 2—4 long, the fascicled branches very long and slender, spreading or the lowest reflexed, spikelets purple, obovate, abruptly contracted at the base, 1” long, the first scale one-third the length of the smooth, 9—nerved second and third. Shady pine lands, Eastern North Carolina to Florida. North Car- olina: Ashe, Manteo, 1898. Florida: Curtiss; Jacksonville, 1897, No. 5866. Related to P. arenicolum but larger in every way, more pubes- cent, and with longer leaves. 54) PANICUM TSUGETORUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 25: 86 (1898). Stems tufted, 18’ or less high, at first erect, and simple, at length much branched aboveand prostrate, pubescent with short ascending hairs, or with longer ones towards the base. Sheaths shorter than the inter- nodes, pubescent with ascending hairs; ligule short, pub- escent. Leaves lanceolate, the largest 2’—3’ long, 3”—4” wide, later ones smaller, glabreus above, beneath ap- pressed pubescent. Panicle broadly oval, about 2’ long, the branches ascending; spikelets broadly obovate, about %” long, pubescent. Hemlock woods; Connecticut, and New York. 55) PANICUM TENNESSEENSE Ashe, sp. nov. Tufted, low, 5—12’ high, erect or ascending from a geniculate base, very slender, at first simple, soon densely branch- ed above with short branches, glabrous or nearly so. Sheaths often nearly as lone as the internodes, at least the lower ones covered with a short, seft pubescence; ligule short-pilose. Leaves spreading, thin, 3—5-nerved, the margins very rough, smooth above, beneath appress- ed pubescent and roughish, the largest 23’—3’ long, 3”—4” wide, widest in the middle, abruptly pointed, nar- rowed to the rounded base; secondary leaves thickly ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 53 crowded above, about 1’ long, spreading, much longer than the very numerous, short, secondary panicles. Primary panicles short-peduncled, 1’—2’ in length, oval, the spreading branches mostly single, rather few flowered, the slender peduncles two to many times the length of the obovate, pubescent, %” long spikelets. Related to P. Joorii, which it somewhat resembles. Based on No. 7087 Biltmore Herbarium: Cedar glades, LaVergne Co., ‘Tennessee. 56) Panicum ATLANTICUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 24:346 (1897). Culms tufted, erect or ascending from a usually geniculate base, 10’—20’ high. Stem more or less pilose with spreading or ascending hairs, the nodes long-barbed above the naked ring. Sheaths pilose to villous, gener- ally papillate, the lowest nearly as long as the inter- odes, the upper much shorter; ligule pilose, hairs 2”—3” long. Stem leaves ascending, above smoothish, below generally villous, the margins often ciliate with long hairs, 2’—3’ long, 2”—3” wide, linear-lanceolate; narrow- ed at the somewhat rounded base, taper-pointed, middle leaves the longest; basal leaves much shorter; the later leaves on the secondary branches, ascending, one-half the length of the primary,smooth.’ Panicle 2—3’ long, nearly as wide, long-peduncled, the branches somewhat ascend- ing, spikelets rather numerous, obovate, acute, quite 1” long, the first scale full one-third as long as the minutely pubescent 9-nerved second and third; later panicles not expanding, one-half the length of the surrounding leaves. New York to North Carolina, and probably farther southward, gen- erally near the coast. Delaware: ‘Commons; 1872. North Carolina: - Ashe; Cape Hatteras, 1898. 57) PANICUM SCOPARIOIDE Ashe. sp. nov. Stems sin- ole or a few together, erect, columnar, 16’—20’ high, appressed pubescent. Sheaths papillose-pubescent, with ascending or appressed hairs, the lower much shorter than the internodes, the upper longer ; ligule pilose. 54 JOURNAL OF THE Leaves linear-lanceolate, spreading and ascending, 2’—3’ long, about 3” wide, rounded at the base, generally 9-nerved, beneath appressed pubescent, above glabrous, lower leaves distant, the upper approximate. Panicle 1’__9? Jong, broadly oval, the branches fascicled, spread- ing, spikelets rather numerous, broadly obovate, some- what over 1” long, apiculate, the acute first scale scarce- ly one-third the length of the nearly smooth 7-nerved second and third. A species with the habit of P. scoparium, and spikelets which are nearly the size and shape of those of P. viscidum. Based on No. 283, ex Herb. A. Commons. Dry soil, Centreville, Del. June, 1873. Dis- tributed sub nom. P. Scribnerianum Nash. 58) PANICUM VILLOSSISSIMUM Nash, Torr. Bul. 23: 149 (1896). Stems erect or ascending, tufted, slender, 16’—24’ high. villous with long, ascending hairs, barbed above the glabrous nodes, "joints geniculate. Sheaths much shorter than the internodes, villous ; ligule pilose. Stem leaves linear-lanceolate 25’—4’ long, 3’’—4’’ wide, rounded at the base, ascending, longest about the middle of the culm, the upper scarcely reduced, more or less vil- lous with spreading hairs; basal leaves much shorter and not conspicuous. Panicle 25’—33’ long, equally as broad, the numerous slender branches fascicled; spikelets ob- ovate. about 1”’ long on slender pedicels. Collected by Dr. J. K. Smallin the Ocmulgee river swamp in May, 1895. Related to P. pubescens and P, haemacarpon. 59) PANICUM PUBESCENS Lam. Encl. 4:748 (1797). Culms tufted’ 10’—20’ high, slender, erect, joints genic- ulate, stem to base of panicle villous with long, white, spreading hairs, a ring of longer hairs above the joint, below which is a naked ring. Sheaths about one half the length of the internodes, villous with long white hairs, minutely papillate; ligule pilose. Stem leaves ascending, linear-lanceolate, gradually narrowed at the base, taper- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIFTY. 55 pointed, villous to sparingly hirsute, 7--9-nerved, the longest about 3’ long and 3”’ wide; upper leaves much re- duced in size; basal leaves hirsute, shorter and broader. Panicle about 2inches long, nearly as broad, the branches single or in pairs, spreading or ascending; spikelets somewhat obovate, obtuse, scarcely 1”’ long, first scale one third the length of the pubescent, 7-nerved second and third; peduncled 2 to 3 times the length of panicle. The late form densely fasciculately branched and spread- ing’. Maine tolowa, Georgia and Missouri. Very close to P. implicatum. Maine: Merrill, 1895. Georgia: Ashe; Atlanta, 1896. Iowa: Crat- ty; Armstrong, 1889, No. 1067. Missouri: von Schrenk; St. Louis, 1897. 60) Panicum CoMMONSIANUM Ashe, sp. nov. Stems clustered, erect, strict, 8’—16’ high, below appressed pubescent, above ¢labrous or puberulent. Sheaths short- er than the leaves or the lower overlapping, the lower appressed pubescent with ascending hairs, the nodes densely barbed with short ascending hairs. Leaves glab- rous, or sparingly ciliate near the base eréct or ascend- ing, narrowly lanceolate, gradually narrowed to the apex from near the base; 14’—2’ long, ligule pilose. Panicle 11’ —3’ long, as broad as long, the branches fascicled, spreading, long-peduncled, glabrous or the axis puberu- lent; spikelets 1’’ long, obovate, or broadly elliptical, pu- bescent. Roots very long and fibrous. Based on No. 341, Commons. Collected in drifting sands along the coast, Cape May, N. J. June, 1898. Related to P. haemacarpon. 61) PanicuM HAEMACARPON Ashe, sp. nov. Tutted, stems erect or ascending from a geniculate base, 12’—18° high, below villous with long spreading or ascending hairs, above sometimes smoothish. Sheaths shorter than the internodes, papillate, villose with long soft, spreading hairs; the nodes bearded with spreading or reflexed hairs. 56 JOURNAL OF THE Leaves erect or ascending, 1’—2’ long, 2’’—3’’ wide, lan- ceolate, the middle ones longest, the upper much reduced, the lower pilose beneath, the upper pubescent with long scattered hairs on the upper surface,appressed pubescent, often papillate, beneath. Panicles 13’—2’ long, broader than long, the branches wide-spreading somewhat fasci- cled, rather few-flowered; spikelets 1’° long, broadly ob- ovate, apiculate, the first scale one-third the length of the pubescent second and third. Spikelets generally red, or purplish. Closely related to P. villossissimum from which separated by its gen- erally ascending habit, erect leaves, the upper reduced, and shorter usually ascending pubescence. District of Columbia: Kearney; 1897. Ashe: North Carolina; Chapel Hill, 1898. lIowa: Carver; Jewell Junction, 1895, No 258. 62) PANICUM ARENICOLUM Ashe, sp. nov. Erect from a usually geniculate base, 10’ to 24’ high, pubescent, at least below, with soft ascending hairs. Sheaths shorter than the joints, pubescent with short ascending hairs Stem leaves erect or ascending, longest near the base of the stem, much reduced in size upward, the largest 2’— 3’ long, 2” wide, long taper-pointed, glabrous above, be- neath more or less papillose-pubescent. Panicle long ex- certed, 2’—3’ long pyramidal, the flexuous fascicled branches spreading, at length reflexed. Spikelets somewhat less than 1” long, obevate, obtuse. : Intermediate in size, habit, and general characters between P. ciliife- rum and P. demissum, smaller than the former and larger than the latter. Type material collected by the writer at Chapel Hill, N. C. June 1898, and later at several localities in the eastern portion of the same state, 63) PANICUM LAXIFLORUM Lam. Encvcl. 4: 748 (1797). P. Muhlenbergit Nutt. in Herb. P. acuminatum Swarz. ex Muhl. Gram. Stems densely tufted, ascend- ing or spreading or later reclining, 15’—20’ long, smooth or somewhat pubescent. Sheaths very short, ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 57 one-third the lengthof the leaves, papillose-hirsute: li- cule a mere margin. Stem leaves few, mostly near the base of the culms, ascending or spreading, narrowly lan- ceolate, very taper-pointed, narrowed at the base or somewhat rounded, 7 to 9-nerved, the largest 3’—4’ long, 4”’__5”’ wide, the upper leaves, scarcely reduced in size, elabrous or hirsute with long white hairs, often with cil- iate margins ; basal leaves shorter but similar to these of the stem, ciliate-margined, often hirsute, very abundant, soft and lax. Panicle 3’ to 4’ long, obovate, the branches slender, lax; spikelets obovate, about 1”’ long, the acut- ish first scale one-fourth the length of the very pubescent, 9-néerved second and third. Late panicles included in very short sheaths which are not longer than the basal leaves. Primary culms do not become fasciculately branched. Color light green. Damp shady hillsides, Maryland and Ken- tucky to Alabama and Florida. The basal leaves form large tufts which remain green throughout the winter. It is one of the earliest spring species. April-July. West Virginia; Small, 1892. Florida ; Curtiss, Juniper, 1895, No. 5537. Tennessee ; Ruth, 1897. . Panicum caricifolium Scribn. in herb. as distributed by Kearney (Washington, D. C., May, 1897) differs from this only in its somewhat smaller—quite 34’? long spikelets. 64) PANICUM LANUGINOSUM Elliott. Sk. 1:123 (1817). Stems ascending from a geniculate base, rather stout, 12’—24’ long, villous below, pubescent above. Sheaths shorter than the leaves, the lower, at least, densely pilose with soft pubescence, the upper often glabrous, barbed above the naked joint ; ligule a ring of long hairs. Stem leaves lanceolate, rounded at the base, spreading or as- cending, the largest near the base of the stem, 23’—3’ long, 3°—4” wide, 9—11-nerved, generally soft-pubescent be- neath, glabrous above, or the lowest pilose on both sides, finely ciliate on the margins, particularly the upper ones toward the base ; upper leaves much reduced in size. Pan- icle 2’—3’ long nearly as wide, the numerous, fascicled, smooth branches ascending ; spikelets small for size of 58 JOURNAL OF THE plant, about }’’ long, obovate, very pubescent, first scale about one-third as lone as the 7-nerved second and third. Peduncle twice the length of panicle. Dry sandy fields, New Jersey to Georgia near the coast. Related to PP viscidum. Description based on plants growing at Chapel Hill, N. C. Delaware : Commons; Mt. Cuba, 1871. Washington, D. C.: Kearney; 1897. Ashe; North Carolina: Chapel Hill, 1898, 65) PANICUM IMPLICATUM Scribn. Bul. 11, U..S. Div. of Agrost. 43 (1898). Culms erect, tufted, 12’—20” high, very slender, somewhat geniculate at the nodes. Stem, to base of panicle, more or less pubescent with short white hairs, barbed above the naked ring at the joints. Sheaths about one-half the length of the inter- nodes, more or less hirsute, at least below ; ligule a ring of hairs 2” long. Stem leaves ascending, linear-lanceo- late, gradually narrowed to the base, 2’—3’ long, about 3’? wide. 7—9-nerved, more or less pubescent; basal leaves much shorter, nearly glabrous. Panicle 1’ or more long, about as wide, the numerous slender branches spreading ; spikelets obovate, apiculate, 5 —%’’ long, first scale minute, one-fourth as long as the nearly glab- rous, 7-nerved second and third. Color of piant green, often purplish. Late stages much branched above. Northeastern States. Specimens examined : New Jersey; Com- mons, 1897. New York : Wiegand, Ithaca, 1893. New York: Ashe; Watkins, June, 1898. New York: Ashe; Courtland, Aug. 1898. Maine; Merrill, 1897. Its smaller leaves, more branched panicle, and smaller spikelets separate this plant from /. pubescens to which it is most closely related. 66) PANICUM ANNULUM Ashe, sp. nov. Stems erect, generally single, 18’—30’ high, below pilose, above gen- erally glabrous, purple. Sheaths shorter than the inter- nodes, at least the lower soft-pilose, nodes barbed ; lig- ule very short, pubescent. Leaves lanceolate, 3’—4’ long, 4’?_6’’ wide, narrowed to the rounded base, the lower pilose on the lower surface, the upper generally glab- a ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 59 rous, purplish, spreading. Panicle 2’—3’ long, oval, the fascicled branches spreading or reflexed ; spikelets about #” long, narrowly obovate, pubescent; the axis of the panicle generally viscid. The later stage much branch- ed. Dry rocky woods. Maryland to North Carolina and Georgia. Near Washington, D. C. Ward; 1892. North Carolina: Ashe; Chapel Hill, 1898. Georgia: Ashe; Stone Mt., 1896. Related to P. barbu- latum, but has a smaller panicle, and is pubescent. 67) PANICUM MERIDIONALE Ashe, sp. nev. Stems 4’—8’ high, densely tufted, erect or ascending, villous with ascending hairs, purplish, very leafy. Sheaths striate, villous with ascending hairs, generally shorter than the internodes; ligule pilose. Leaves numerous, erect or ascending, 1’—13’ long, about 2’ wide, lanceolate, rounded at the base, beneath pubescent with short as- cending hairs, above with a few scattered long hairs, or towards the base of the leaf villous. Panicle glabrous 1’—2’ long, the branches single or a few together, as- cending ; spikelets elliptical or obovate, nearly }"’ long, the first scale about one third the length of the glabrous second and third. I have collected this species at two localities in North Carolina, Chapel Hill in June, 1898; and Jonas Ridge, Burke Co., June, 1893. As these two stations are far apart the plant probably occurs in other States to the north and south of North Carolina. Dry rocky woods. Very different from either P. filiculme, P. implicatum or P, pubescens. 68) PANICUM FILICULME Ashe, sp. nov. Stems tufted, or single, at first simple, later fasciculately branched above, erect, very slender, 6’—10’ high, more or less vil- lous with ascending hairs. Sheaths villous with ascend- ing hairs, shorter than the internodes; ligule of very short pubescence or of long hair. Leaves narrowly ian- ceolate, 13’ long or less, 1’’-—2”’ wide, rounded at the base, the lower surface papillose, appressed pubescent, the upper nearly glabrous, hirsute, or merely the mar- 60 JOURNAL OF THE gins fringed with long erect hairs, the upper leaves reduced in size; secondary leaves smaller, longer than the panicles. Panicle long-peduncled, small, about 3’ long, the rather short branches, erect or ascending ; spike- lets broadly obovate, obtuse, about 3’’ long. Dry soil, middle North Carolina to Georgia in the Piedmont plateau region. Related to P. implicatum and P. pubescens. North Carolina: Ashe ; Chapel Hill, 1898. Georgia: Small; Stone Mt., Aug. 1895. 69) PANICUM CILIATUM. Ell. Sk. 1:426 (1817). P. ciliatifolium Kth. Stems erect, 8—16’ high, smooth, slender. Sheaths smooth ; ligule not hairy. Stem leaves, one to three, lanceolate, 1’—2’ long,2’’--3’’ wide, smooth ex- cept for the ciliate margins ; basal leaves very numerous, broader -and longer than the stem leaves, the entire mar- gin ciliate with long hairs, otherwise glabrous. Panicle rather small, 1’—2’ long, nearly as wide, the fascicled branches ascending or spreading ; peduncles 4 to 5 times the length of the panicle, smooth, spikelets on very slen- der pedicels, 3 or more times their length, nearly 2”’ long, obovate, acute, the first scale nearly one-half as long as the smooth 7-nerved second and third. | Color pale green. Rather uncommon. Ditch banks and sandy swamps, eastern North Carolina to Florida. A beautiful species. North Carolina: Ashe; near Wilmington. 1897. Florida: Biltmore Herbarium ; Apalachicola, No. 6022 a. 70) PANICUM POLYCAULON Nash. Torr. Bul. 24:200, (1897.) Stems densely tufted, 6’—10’ tall, simple, nearly naked, at length somewhat branched, sheaths loose, glabrous, the margins ciliate, upper longest; lig- ule pubescent. Stem leaves ascending, lanceolate, the longest about 3’ long, 4’’ wide, ciliate on the margins 7—9-nerved ; basal leaves numerous, ciliate. Panicle about 1’ long, its axis somewhat pilose; spikelets about 3’? long, obovate, first scale about 3’ long, as the 7- nerved, glabrous second and third. ‘The narrower leaves more slender culms, and smaller and glabrous ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 61 spikelets well distinguish this from P. ctliatum E11., to which it is most nearly allied.”’ Florida and Cuba. 71) PANICUM LONGIPEDUNCULATUM Scribn. Stems erect, somewhat clustered, 6’—10’ high ; sheaths villous with spreading hairs, or nearly glabrous inflated; ligule hairy. Stem leaves few, distant, ascending, 2”’—3”’ wide, lanceolate, narrowed to the somewhat rounded base, soft pubescent on both sides, the margin’ ciliate ; basal leaves rather numerous, as long and as wide as those of the stem, pubescent on both sides, ciliate on the margins. Panicle about 2’ long, oval, the axis pubes- cent, branches fascicled, spreading, slender ; spikelets obovate, barely 4”’ long, obtuse, the first scale one-half the length of the smooth 7-nerved second and third, ped- icels 3 to 4 times the length of the spikelets. Color pale green. Ditch banks and wet sandy places, eastern North Carolina to Florida. North Carolina: Ashe; Roanoke Island, June, 1898. Florida: Curtiss ; Jacksonville. The basal leaves of this spe- cies, like those of P. ciliatum, are much more prominent than the stem leaves, and the stems, having rather few leaves, appear rather naked. The autumnal stage is not fasciculately branched. 72) PANICUM MICROPHYLLUM Ashe, sp. nov. Some- what tufted, 8’—20’ high, slender, ascending or reclin- ing, glabrous or pubescent with long white ascending hairs. Sheaths glabrous or pubescent, very much short- er than the internodes; ligule pilose. Stem leaves dis- tant, ascending, linear-lanceolate, 1’ long or less, 1”—2”’ wide, generally more or less villous. Basal leaves crowd- ed, 1’ or more long, 3’’—4”’ wide. Late forms somewhat fasciculately branched above. Panicle long-peduncled, about 1’ long, the slender branches ascending ; spikelets, 4’*—%”’ long very broadly obovate, the minute first scale acute, one-fourth the length of the 7-nerved second and third. Related to P. angustifolium. Collected by the writer June, 1898, at Chapel Hill, N. C.,in moist sunny woods. ou 62 JOURNAL OF THE 73) Panicum Brirtront Nash. Torr. Bul. 24:194 (1897). Stems tufted, glabrous, very slender, erect, stiff. Sheaths, glabrous, very short; ligule pubescent. Leaves longer than the sheaths, few in number, the mid- dle leaves longest, 14 long or less, less than 13”’ wide. Panicle 1’ long or less, branches rather few, spreading ; spikelets obovate, obtuse, {’’ long, pubescent. Moist sand, in pine woods. Southern New Jersey. 74) PANICUM GLABRISSIMUM Ashe, sp. nov. Culms very slender, 12’—20”’ high, tufted, erect smooth and glabrous throughout. Sheaths much shorter than the internodes, glabrous ; no ligule. Stem leaves very short, distant, less than 1’ long, less than 13” wide, narrowed to the base, erect or ascending, glabrous or sometimes with the narrowed base sparingly ciliate. Basal leaves 13’ long or less, 2’’—3”’ wide, ascending, glabrous. Panicle, peduncled, about 1’ long, quite as wide, branches wide- spreading; spikelets, broadly oval or spheroid, about 3”’ long, glabrous or nearly so, purple. The type material was collected by me June 1898, at Manteo, Dare Co., N. C. NATURAL SCIENCE OF THE ANCIENTS AS INTERPRETED BY LUCRETIUS. F. P. VENABLE. There is no work, coming from an ancient author, which gives so full a picture of the beliefs and theories of an- cient times as to the physical side of natureas Lucretius’ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 63 poem De Rerum Natura. It is by reading this that one may get the best insight into the ancient habit of thought concerning natural phenomena and the poem can be rec- commended to all who are fond of tracing over again an- cient by-paths and half-lost tracks. I do not purpose in this review to deal critically with the philosophy of the poem but rather to note the expla- nations offered of the various natural phenomena observ- ed. We need not boast of our great knowledge of to-day but it becomes more precious to us when we realize how painfully and slewly it has been won for us, and how through centuries of darkness we have come to clearer light. A word or two concerning the poem itself and its au- thor may not beamiss. Lucretius lived somewhere in the last century preceding the birth of Christ and the poem was published about the middle of that century. An Epicurean in philosophy, and a follower of the atomic school of Demokritos, his poem was written as an exposi- tion of their systems and in their defence. It was in- tended to explain to’ the minds of men the true nature of things and free them from ignorance and superstition. Perhaps the most striking feature of Lucretius’ poem is the deep reverence shown in it for the majesty of nature. ‘The greates: minds were those which interpre- ted nature ana the divinest faculty possessed by man was that through which truth was discovered. Homer was to him preeminent among the poets because he was near to nature and her great interpreter. Prof. Sellars has said of him: ‘Tt is, however, in his devotion to truth that Lucretius more than in any other quality rises clearly above the level of his countrymen and his age. He thus combines what is greatest in the Greek and Roman mind, the Greek order of inquiry and the Roman manliness of 64 JOURNAL OF THE heart. i . ‘ He unites the specu- lative passion of the dawn of ancient inquiry with the real observation of its meridian; and he has brought the imaginative conception of nature that gave birth to the earliest philosophy into harmony with the Italian love of the living beauty of the world.” This poem is, as Constant Martha calls it, the most an- cient monument of the science of Rome. Lucretius had the difficult task of transcribing the concise, dry philosophy of Epicurus into the language of a people who knew little of science and cared less for it, except in the form of some useful application, and it re- quired great ingenuity to succeed in conveying the desired ideas in a language so deficient in the needed terms. There is perhaps no great originality shown by Lucretius in the subject-matter of the poem but his enthusiasm and intense admiration for his master made him throw his whole poetic spirit into the task and so to give life and vivacity to the dry bones of the system. With a truly Roman simplicity,as Martha says, he believed that he and his master had said the last word of science, He was confident that his theories had solved all the mysteries of the universe, many of which were after all but the crea- tions of superstition and trembling ignorance. A similar statement is made triumphantly nearly twenty centuries later by Berthelot. In the preface to his des Orig- ines de l’ Alchimie he too maintains thatscience has done away with mystery. ‘‘Ze monde est aujourd’ hui sans mystere.’’ Wesmile at the solutions which Epicurus, through his devoted follower, offered of the phenom- ena of nature. Whocan feel assured that some future ceneration shall not smile, with the same pitying superi- ority, over the iguorance and folly of Berthelot. ‘‘But the old problems that have defied the thought of the ages still wait for a solution. When men inquire for | | ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 65 the origin of matter and how it is constituted, or for the origin of force and how it operates, the sphinx is dumb. When they attempt to get behind the phenomena of heat, electricity, magnetism, they are chailenged by a sentinel they can not bribe nor force.’ * On an examination of this poem the essential difference between the ancient scientific method and the present is revealed and with it the reason for much failure and little progress. Lucretius first announced his theory and then proceeded to fit it, forcibly if need be, to every fact that came within his observation. This process is reversed by the modern man of science. He first gathers his facts and from their study develops his theory. A mind al- ready full cannot receive new truth. The emptied ves- sel is the only one which is ready for filling. To the mind of Lucretius the ‘‘Universe is a real exist- istence and absolutely dual in nature. Body and space, or matter and vacuum, are, the two essential elements ad- mitting nothird. Bodies, are therefore, made up of atoms and pores. Neither can exist where the other is. The atoms are composite, yet, paradoxical as it may seem, are solid, single, indivisible and indestructible.”’ Know, then, the entire of Nature sole consists Of Space and Body: this the substance moved And that the area of its motive power. Know, too that bodies, in their frame consist, Part of primordial atoms uncombined, And part combined and blending: these alone Previous and rare; while those so solid formed No force create can sever, or dissolve. Now the task which Lucretius sets himself is to take this theory and by meaus of it explain the formation of the material world without the introduction of any cre- ative intelligence, the genius of man and animals, the causative forces in all the natural phenomena and even * Harrington. Meth. Quart. Rev. 1876. LVIII. 64, a 66 JOURNAL OF THE the nature of such things as heat and light and of thought itself. In fact it is concerning the ‘‘nature of things’’ that he writes. Let us see first how Lucretius reasons away the diffi- culty that his atoms cannot be detected by the sight and so brought within the reach of examination. Learn now of bodies which you must confess Exist in things, but yet nowhere can see. First when incited winds o’er ocean sweep, Dispersing clouds, o’er whelming mighty ships, % * * * Thus secret bodies sure exist in winds Which sweep the sea, the land, the clouds of heaven. * * * * * So various odors we perceive in things, Yet naught matérial see the organ strike. Nor heat, nor cold, nor sounds, can eye discern, Though all of corpor’al nature must consist, Since they the senses strike; for know, bodies Alone can bodies touch or touched be. Book 5 p. 46. Again he very beautifully impresses the lesson, which he himself so imperfectly learned, that we must reason as to causes from their visible working. Caverns deeply worn, Where rocks impend v’er the corroding sea, Show not the gnawing Of each breaking wave: For Nature acts on atoms hid from sight, In secret working, but results reveals. Book I p. 47. See what proof he offers as to the existence of voids in matter. This wasa very essential part of his theory and it is easy to see how convincing the phenomena must have seemed to such a materalist as Lucretius: A void exists in things. However solid bodies may appear, Void spaces they contain, since water drips In caves and grots, and drops ooze out from rocks, And ali around with trickling moisture weeps Sound traverses closed doors and solid walls While stiffening cold strikes piercing through the limbs. But were no void how could such bodies pass? You needs must see it were impossible. Book 1 p. 48. MLISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 67 His explanation of the difference in the specific gravity of various bodies is based upon this theory of voids. Why do some things excel in weight others Of greater size? If equal matter be In globe of wool and lead, why equal not In what to matter most essential is— Weight? Downward pressing to the void unknown, The greater lighter than the less, thus prove Existence of a void, the heavier still Embracing less than light of spaces void. Book I p. 49. From his standpoint-the weight was dependent upon density or compactness. From this is it might be inferr- ed that all atoms had the same weight. The beautiful phenomenon of the condensation of moist- ure upon a cold surface is correctly explained if we dis- regard the description of a material nature and separate existence to cold. Cold permeates the silver cup or gold, With water filled, held brimming in the hand, And dew-like moisture gathers on without. Thus naught in nature solid seems to be. Book I p. 53. The doctrine of the indestructibility of matter has been commonly accredited to Lavoisier but a recent writ- er has shown that the saying attributed to him ‘‘/zen ne se perd et rien ne se crée’”’ does not occur in his works and that at best he tacitly assumed this which had long been believed by others. Kahlbaum traces it to P. Mersenne the friend of Descartes but, it iseasy togo many centuries back of this and to find the doctrine clearly stated in Lucretius. He writes of his atoms: Nature reserving these as seeds of things, Permits in them no minish nor decay; They can’t be fewer and they can’t be less. Book 1 p. 57. 68 JOURNAL OF THE Or again: Decay of some leaves others free to grow And thus the sum of things rests unimpaired Book II p. 79, And again: The store of elements material, _ Admits no diminution, no increase; Book II p. 86. No modern scientific man could state more clearly than Lucretius does, the ideas which prevail at present as to the motions of the atoms, Says Tyndall of the parti- cles in a mass of iron: ‘‘There is space between them, they collide, recoil, they oscillate.” The poet states it thus: No place of rest is found To primal bodies through the vast profound, And, finding none, they cease not ceaseless rounds. Part forced together, wide asunder leap; From closer blow part, grappling with their kind, In close affinities unite and form Bodies of various figure—varied forms diverse. Book I p. 80. Again: For infinite atoms, in a boundless void, By endless motions build the frame of things. Book II p. 82 All things are made up of these atoms: The same elements constitute the air, The sun, the earth and animals and plants, And other things by union various. Book I p. 63. Lucretius makes much use of what he calls the ‘‘seeds of heat,’ that is, the atoms which by their concurrence form heat. Thus he explains the heat resulting from friction. The neighbor top of trees swayed by the wind Are creaking rubbed, till by attrition they Burst into flower of flame; not that the fire Dwells in the wood but rather seeds of heat —S ee ee. ‘ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. 69 By friction forced to flow, together run, — Aud bursting barriers fire the leafy tops. For sure, if latent lay the flames in wood, Not long could they be hid, but, bursting forth, Would ravage forests, burning every shrub . Book I p. 63. He is an avowed opponent of the ordinary view of grav itation. In common with his countrymen, he thought lightly of mathematics. | Guard agaist belief Of what some say, ‘‘that to the centre tend Allthings, and thus the world can stand Without external impulses and shocks.’’— BooklI, p 71. Are we to look upon the following passage as a_ pre- diction of the discovery of argon and its strange compan- ions? Speaking of his atoms he says: And some there are wide wandering in space, That all affinities reject, nor can unite With any body in a common bond.—Book II p. 81. He puzzles over one of owr deep problems, the co-exist- ence of sovereign law and the free will of the creature. Again, if all motion in a chain were bound, If new from old in fixed order flowed, Cause linked to cause in an eternal round ; If atoms no concealed clinamen had Cause to create, and break the bond of fate, How could free-will in animals exist? In speaking of the dissimilarity in atoms he discusses the nature of fire and cold. Hisconclusions are some- what startling : How different is fire from piercing frost! Yet both composed of atoms toothed and sharp As proved by touch. Touch, O ye sacred powers! Touch is the organ whence all knowledge flows: Book II p. 90 His theory as to the three physical states is that solids are made ‘‘of atoms hooked like branches deep entwined’’; liquids, ‘‘of bodies round and smooth must be composed”’; 70 JOURNAL OF THE ‘‘while those that inan instant are dispersed, and flee away, as smoke, or clouds, or flame,” are formed of ‘‘sharp and not of atoms hooked since pores they pene- bhates,’ The dependence of color upon light is well recognized ‘‘without light no color can exist.”’ Atoms are colorless and not subject to the rays of light, He has noted that The more minutely things divided are The more their colors fade. He has observed that ight traverses space more rapid- ly than sound, ; Far quicker comes the impulse to the eye Than to the ear: Book VI p. 263. There is an interesting passage in the works of Van Helmont in which he describes the artificial generation of mice from a soiled shirt plaged along with some flour in a barrel or other vessel. ‘The method sounds plausible and doubtless an experiment along that line would result in mice :n the barrel. -But too much credit must not be ascribed to Van Helmont as the original discoverer for after all his ingenious idea was not original. Our poet of the last of the old centuries says; Facts manifest Confute not but confirm and force belief, That all the living from the lifeless springs ; For see live worms creep from the putrid clod, When the warm earth is wet with timely showers. Book II p. 106. Darwin might have gotten an idea or two from our an- cient philesepher for his ‘‘Observations upon EKarth- worms’’. Lucretius’ ideas as to life, disease and deathare also instructive. Men of deeper learning than he have wres- tled with this problem of Life and Death with equal ~ ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. ° 71 failure. ‘The best of modern thought agrees with him in one sense at least when he says: ‘‘And life itself is but a part of death.”’ Death he believes comes from some shock which shat- ters and destroys the union of the atoms. The shock theory of fermentation and decay was vigorously main- tained and defended duriug the frst half of this century. Then when some greater shock a life assails Than Nature can support, sudden all sense Of mind and body is confused and stunned. The ordering of elements dissolved, Their bond of union snapped, the silver cord Is loosed, the vital tide turned back, and life With all its elements dispersed. But what Can blows do more than shatter and dissolve What once was joined? : Book II p. 108 Liebig in 1852 reasoned that contagion was due to gaseous matter in’a state of decomposition. Disease is excited by contagion. According to the ‘“‘law of La Place and Berthollet: A molecule set in motion by any power can impart its own motion to another molecule with which it may be in contact. The motion of these decomposing molecules is transmitted to the blood and if decomposition there is not overcome it proceeds over the entire body.’’ ‘This reads almost as strangely as the words of Lucretius. It is only just to Liebig to add that he acknowledged his errors afterwards and accept- ed the theories of Pasteur and Schiitzenberger. Lucretius’ theory of contagion would sound very much like the modern germ theory if only his seeds were en- dewed with life. First, then the air teems, as I’ve taught, with seeds Diverse, some favoring life, but many more Fraught with disease and death; chance gathered, these Infect the sky, malignant make the air. Lucretius has anticipated the recent address of Sir 72 JOURNAL OF THE William Crookes, the learned President of the British ‘Association for the Advancement of Science, by more than nineteen centuries in the prediction of the exhaust- ion of ‘tthe wern-out Earth.’’ True he did not fix upon 1931 as the date of complete exhaustion still he evidently did not think it very far off. Like all sturdy conserva- tives he praised the good old times. B’en now the worn-out earth with age effete, * og that in her early prime € = ¥ To children of her care Spontaneous gave— In rich abundance gave the shining grain, Which now with labor huge she scant supplies In niggard pittance to more pressing wants, With weary steps we urge the weary ox, And turn exhausted fields, that scarce return Decreasing harvests to increasing toil. The aged ploughman shakes his.weary head So oft his labor unavailing proves: How oft doth he then repining chide his lot Comparing present times with past, exalt ' The fortune of his sires. Book. II p. 114. He gives a remarkable explanation of the nature of re- flected images. These are made up of Thin effigies and forms Which singly are unseen; but when outpoured In a continuous andimpulsive flow, Give by reflection, images of things. These effigies ‘‘wander not alone.’’ They ‘‘fill the embracing air with floating forms.’’ This is proved by the fact that in whatever direction the mirror is turned, ‘straight in its silent depths the scene responds.’”’ The reversal of the image in the mirror is explained at some length. The image itself suffers change on turning back from the mirror. As when the plastic mask of wax, or clay, Dashed sudden ’gainst a wall, backward reverts, The well-recognized law that the angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence comes from Lucretius thus: ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY. %3 For with what slope They fall, Nature compels them to revert again. Peter Schlemih], the famous shadowless man of Chamisso would have been wondrously relieved if he could have read Lucretius and learned, The obsequious shadow that attends our steps, When walking in the sun seems of itseif To walk with us and every gesture mock Yet nothing is but space, deprived of light : Book IV p. 169, . If we accept Lucretius’ theory that ‘‘all sounds cor- poreal are,’’ then it is easy to account for prevalent sore throats: And voice escaping to the sphery air, Roughens the throat, abrades the passages, ‘“Whence come our mental images’’ is surely a most important question to settle but one before which the boldest is apt to hesitate. | There is no such hesitancy about Lucretius, however. ‘‘Innumerable idols float in space.’’ These are many sub- tleand of finer texture than the ‘‘attenuate thread of spid- er or the roof of filmy gold.’” ‘These Through rarer pores can penetrate. And sentient make the mind in inmost seats. Book IV p. 181 Any one inclined toward materialism can read with in- terest the intense materialsm of this old Epicurean. His cosmogeny is brilliantly fanciful. As to the sun it is neither ereater nor less than it appears and this is true alsoof moon and stars. Whether thesun returis by a course beneath the earth or whether it is exhausted by its day’s course and its place is taken by a new one, formed by the col- lection of ‘‘dispersed seeds of heat’’ he does not venture to decide. Kclipses and the moon’s phases are also dis- cussed. The struggle for existence is pictured and something very similar to the doctrine of the survi- 74 JOURNAL OF THE val of the fittest is announced. Thunder is the rushing to- gether of several clouds ‘‘driven by warring winds.”’ The nature of clouds he discusses at greatlength. Some of these phenomena have puzzled men all through the ages and it is not nccessary to point ont how imperfect our knowledge still 1s. ) The interior of the earth is constituted as the surface and hence contains caves. lakes etc. Ihe falling in of such caverned depths cause the earthquakes. In these* caverns the air in motion ‘‘makes glow the rocks around.”’ Winged flames then ‘‘vomit from wide open jaws’’ hurl rocks, and send out cinders and smoke, and so volcanoes are formed. ~The constancy of the volume of the sea was observed by Lucretius and correctly accounted for. A strangely mistaken observation as to the temperature of wells is mentioned and of course his theory is made to cover and explain it. Such waters were thought to be cold in summer and warmin winter. This was, of course because what we mav call the personal thermometer reg- istered largely the relation to the temperature of the atmosphere. I have not been able to exhaust all of the observations recorded by this early philosopher, nor to properly show his ingenuity in fitting his theory as to atoms and the ‘‘seeds of things’’ to every case. Nor has it been possible to give a just idea of the grace and poetic beauty of this the first and only attempt to bring all of natural science within the limits of a single poem. WORKS CONSULTED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS ARTICLE. 1 TT. Lucretii Cari, De rerum natura, ex editione Gibb., Wakefieldi, Valpey’s auctores classici. 2 Lucretius, On the Nature of Things. O Hideniarle Sound’ <=> : cela o MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PRINCIPAL * GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS AND WATER-POWER IN NORTH CAROLINA 1898. ee oe ES ee ZZ METAMORPHOSED SLATES AND AHHH GNEISS SLATES, SCHISTS, LIMESTONES, QUARTZITES SEZ) GOHISTS INCLUDING VOLCANICS) (PROBABLY ARCHAEAN.) AND CONGLOMERATES (AGE UNKNOWN.) ‘Scale of Miles of) +4441 \ Water-Power Cape Fear ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 108 easterly and southerly direction for a distance of but little more than 25 miles; but in this distance it crosses the course or strike of the rocks at right angles. The changes in the character of the rocks are numerous, the rocks even being schistose and slaty in places and the stream is literally a succession of shoals, the aggregate fall being not less than 175 feet. At a point some 10 miles south of Statesville, as will be seen on the small map, the river reaches the typical granite belt of this region and flows thence southward for a distance of approximately 40 miles, where it crosses the state line into South Carolina. In this part of its course the rocks of the region are again more nearly uniform, and though there are several shoals of importance, as those at Cowans ford, Mountain Island, and Tuckaseegee, yet the number of these shoals in proportion to the distance is much smaller than in the 25-mile section next above. ON THE TRIBUTARIES OF BROAD RIVHR. Among the tributaries of the Broad in Cleveiand and Rutherford counties,the streams descend rapidly from the South Mountains along the upper border of these counties down to the general plain of the Piedmont plateau, flowing in a southerly and southeasterly di- rection nearly at right angles to the general strike of the rock, and in this way encountering the great- est number of changes in the character of these rocks, which results in conditions most favorable for the develop- ment of waterpower. Hence it is that we have in this region a large number of valuable waterpowers, seme half dozen of which are already operating cotton-mills, while others are soon to be utilized in the same way. CONDITIONS IN THE SLATY AND GNEISSIC AREAS COMPARED. In any study of the streams and waterpowers of the 3 109 JOURNAL OF THE Piedmont plateau region it should be borne in mind that while the slaty belts present more favorable conditions for developing waterpowers, as shown in the case of the Yadkin and the other streams which cross the several belts, owing to the fact that in these belts the sheets of rock stand more on edge and vary more in hard- ness and durability, yet the streams which draw their supplies from the granitic and gneissic areas are more uniform in their flow for the reason that while the rain- fall in the different belts is approximately the same, the soils in the granitic and gneissic areas are deeper and more porous and serve more as a sponge for storing up the surplus water of rainy seasons than does the more shallow and compact clayey soils resulting from the decay of the slates. This is one of the principal causes why the flow is less uniform in the case of the Haw and Deep rivers (see map), which lie largely in the slaty belt, than in the case of the Yadkin and Catawba, which lie almost wholly in the granitic and gneissic areas. For- tunate it is then, that these two larger rivers have their headwatersin the granitic and oneissic areas, with gravel- ly, porous soils; and flow across the great slate belt after they have attained their larger proportions. WATERPOWER IN THE MOUNTAIN REGION. A glance at the accompanying small geologic map will show that the larger part of this region is occu- pied by gneissic rocks. These have for the most part a characteristic northeast and southwest strike, and the irregular sheets of rock dip beneath the surface at vary- ing but generally steep angles. The southern half of the region has along its western border an irregu- lar belt of bedded slates, limestones, quartzites and con- glomerates; and these rocks, which make up the bulk ot the Great Smoky mountains, have a general north- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 110 easterly strike and dip at steep and varying angles. Near the eastern border of the region there is another but more narrow and irregular belt of rock of a some- what similar character, following approximately the gen- eral position of the Blue Ridge mountains. The general physiographic features of the region are those mountains and hills with narrow valleys. It may be restated here that the rivers of this region have their sources mainly along the western slope of the Blue Ridge, and that with the exception of New river, near the north- ern boundary, they flow in a general northwesterly di- rection across the upturned edges of both the gneissic and the more recent bedded rocks. ‘The elevation of the country is so great and the descent of the streams so rapid that the general courses of the principal rivers have been but little modified by geologic structure, though their courses lie directly across the strike of the rock ; and the resulting conditions are such as to produce along the streams occasional rapids and cascades. LEspecially would this be the case in the western counties, where the Pigeon, the Tuckasegee, the Little Tennessee and the Hiwassee break through the Great Smoky mountains, and in doing so cross a variety of limestone, quartzite and con- glomerate beds which go to make up the geologic forma- tion of that area, but for the fact that during the long period of time that these streams have occupied their pres- ent channels, owing to the rapidity of their flow and the large quantities of abrading materials, such as sand, grav- el and bowlders, carried down in their currents, the va- riations in the obduracy of the rocks, crossing these stream beds seldom result in cascades of large propor- tions, for the reason that the would-be projecting ledges of rock across the stream bed are kept down near the general level by these eroding agencies. A number of the smaller tributary streams flow in either jo AB) JOURNAL OF THE a southwesterly or a northeasterly direction along the line of the strike of the rocks and thus develop the con- ditions favorable for waterpower, mainly where they vary their courses and cross from rock of one character to one of a different character. In the extreme northern portion of the region the tributaries of New river rise both on the western slopes of the Blue Ridge and the eastern slopes of the Iron mountains, and flow ina general northeasterly or northeriy direction, sometimes following the line of the strike, and sometimes crossing the latter at sharp angles. Along New river and its tributaries are a number of shoals which can be developed into valu- able waterpowers, occuring mainly at points where the. streams cross the strike of the gneissic rock of the region. In connection with the development of these water- powers, the river gorges are so narrow and the streams so rapid that while the construction of large dams is a matter attended with no insurmountable difficulties, yet it is often difficult to find suitable space for buildings, and it has been found more advisable in a number of cases to construct small dams and to convey the water from these in open ditches or flumes along the banks of the stream to suitable points where the power may be utilized. The chief difficulty which is met in storing water on these streams is that the ponds or storage reservoirs become rapidly filled with sand, gravel and bowlders brought down in time of flood. Probably the future develop- ment of these powers will be largely in connection with electrical transmission. GEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE FLOW OF STREAMS. The yearly discharge of a stream depends primarily on the amount of rainfall in the region from which the stream draws its supply, but in a measure this volume, and especially the uniformity of flow, are largely in- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 112 fluenced by the slope of the surface, the depth and poros- ity of the soil, and the character of the underlying rock. In connection with this study of the geologic conditions influencing the possibilities of waterpower development, it should be noted that the occurrence of lakes, swamps or marshes and poorly-drained level areas, deep and porous soils, such as the sandy and gravelly soils from 10 to 100 feet deep, which occur in the larger part of the Piedmont plateau and mountain regions of the Carolinas, the great sand hills of the southern coastal plain region, and the porous sands and gravels of the glaciated regions of the Northern states, all facilitate the uniformity of the flow of the streams in these several regions; and in some regions the jointed, fissured and crushed condition of the underlying rock exerts a favorable influence in the same direction. NOTES ON GRASSES. 1) CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MY HERBARIUM. NO. Iv. WwW. W. ASHE. Since the publication of a paper on the Dichotomous Group of Panicum in the Eastern United States (in this Journal, vol. xv, Nov., 1898) I have found among some duplicates additional material of a plant, a single speci- men of which [ had at that. time, but such scanty mate- rial that I did not care to base a species on it, though it 1) Issued April 20, 1899. 113 JOURNAL OF THE showed excellent specific characters. I find that I have collected the plant at two stations, both in Orange county, N.C. PANICUM ORANGENSIS, sp. nov. Stems 12 to 24 inches long, ascending from a geniculate base, pubescent with long, soft, white, matted hairs, but more or less glabrate towards the top. Lower sheaths crowded and overlapping, pubescent with soft matted hairs; the upper distantand nearly glabrous. Leaves soft-pubescent like | the sheaths, the largest 3 to 4 inches long and 3” to 5”’ wide, lanceolate, long taper-pointed, largest near the base of the stem ; the upper much reduced and often glabrous. Ligule pilose with long hairs. Panicle long-peduncied, oblong, the very numerous, slender fascicled branches ascending ; spikelets scarcely }’’ long, obovate, apiculate, the first scale about.one-third as long as the glabrous 7- nerved second and third. Related to Panicum lanuginosum Ell., and separated from it by hay- ing a longer, softer pubescence and its leaves not being ciliate. Col- lected in June, 1898. As the name Panicum commelinaefolium proposed by me (Mitchell Journ. 15, part 1; 29) for a Georgia plant has already been used by Kunth for another grass, I propose the name Panicum Currant for my plant ; and for Panicum Georgianum Ashe (ibid, 36) I propose the name Panicum Cahoonianum, since Sprengel has made use of the nearly sim- ilar P. Georgicum for a different plant. ANDROPOGON GYRANS sp. nov. Stem very slender, 18 to 24 inches high, glabrous or merely bearded at the up- per joints. Basal leaves 10 to 14 inches iong, 1’’ wide or less, glabrous, often involute and twisted, those of the stem much shorter. Sheaths glabrous. Branches very few, scarcely protruding from the closely wrapped sheaths. Spikes 2 or 4, generally 4, very slender, 6 to 12 flowered, spikelets 13’’ long, shorter than the copious, white, basal hairs ; sterile spikelets of single scale, cov- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 114 ered with long spreading hairs,,as well as its slender pedicel. Distinguished from A. AFiliotit and all the slender forms of that species, by the much smaller spikelets, scattered branches and narrow sheaths, which do not enlarge. Collected by the writer in pine woune in Durham county, N. C., Oct. 1896: ANDROPOGON MOHRII PUNGENSIS, var. nov. Less tomentose than the type. Spikes generally more sumer- ous, 4 to 12, and shorter, enclosed in the sheaths or pro- truding. Collected by the writer in grassy swamps at the head of Pungo river, Washington county, N. C., Oct. and Nov., 1898. ‘ ate ange i, hee eas ii nie ie ey j i we * 4 JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society VOL. XVI 1899 CHAPEL HILL, N. O. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY BER. 4 PR aehee ELIA 1) tub bee CRONE & an ORES WEE, CORRAL Journal ot the Mitchell Society. CONTENTS. VOL. XVI. 1899. hie Hennition of the Element.—F. P. Venable sccccdcc.ccccccccccoccokecccdeccecs 1 muerieature of Valence:—P. P. Venable... 2 ciovccececnocecsdaccccdencccclacceck 15 Preliminary Catalogue of the Birds of Chapel Hill, N. C., With Brief Notes on Some of the Species.—T. G. Pearson.i.....ccccc cece ec ec eee On the Universal Distribution of Titanium.—Chas. Baskerville............ 52 The Occurrence of Vanadiums, Chromium, and Titanium in Peats. OE gh Ta SS A RE EPS. 8). aap 2 Soe eS AE Oey Foe 54 A Study of Certain Double Chromates.—W. G@. Haywood..........cccc00000- 56 © mere oaleotrochis.-—) Se Cither..:2 ec ecebeee dacs scone sdaddcaviudaseeteweeT 59 The Deep Well at Wilmington, N. C.—J. A Holines.......ccccceccccececeeeee os 67 New East American Species of Crataegus.—W. W. Asheé.....cccccccceceec eee es 70 Note on Qualitative Test for Tin.—Chas. Baskerville......... ccccccsceceeneees oe n 4 @ Cane of Sforlars0is Crbrclon «4 ma Some Dichotomous Species of Panicum.—W. W. Ashe... nc eee \> es eweete se . e«* 7? ¢ 4 A . ’ : . “y fis ‘a a a i ; Dot AN : Tepaet® Qa ‘ Peach lett c RMU ery hal ee Cr SF ROT mr wt ts e : 4 4 P ¥ ooh ho : Pein a aties ae eS ! ial als Leen +" ever ue eices §w CEE Vt ewww * * . * 4 ios | « f ~~ -< var ‘Woes Tees Fp SORE ane ’ “ wee ‘ ee ‘ en Ws oe , ; a . iy 4 e a +. : y . . . | . iy ’ , ss , ° ’ t . JOURNAL OF THE tisha Mitchell Scientific Society VOLUME XVI —— PART FIRST January=Jume 1899 POST OFFICE CHAPEL HIE, N:.:C. ISSUED FROM THE UNIVERSITY PRESS CHAPEL Hit, N.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS. THE DEFINITION OF THE ELEMENT. EF, P.. Venriable.. .........05.-20c2 0058 6 THE NATURE OF VALENCE. FF. ‘PP, Vewnnies}..... 0055 Se cee eee THE NATURE OF VALENCE (SECOND PAPER). BK. P. Venables i... oc 62. c nc > on Sa PRELIMINARY CATALOGUE OF THE BIRDS OF CHAPEL HILL, - N. C., WITH BRIEF NOTES ON SOME OF THE SPECIES. T. Gilbert Pearson. ..........55-.....0 0 33 9 JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society SIXTEENTH YEAR—PART FIRST 1899 ' THE DEFINITION OF THE ELEMENT. F. P. VENABLE. It is with hesitation that I enter upon so speculative a dis- cussion as the nature of the elements, and yet there are rea- sons why it should prove of great profit to draw the attention of this representative gathering of the chemists of America to this subject. We have nearly reached the close of the first century in which these elements have been the subject of ex- perimental research. The ingenuity and the patient labor of an army of workers have been directed toward the solution of the many problems connected with these elementary substances, and the ultimate aim, the goal, of all their striving has been the discovery of the properties and the nature of the atom. It is eminently fitting that, as we stand at the threshold of the new century, we glance back along the road we have al- ready come and take some account of the progress we have made. ‘The quicksands of mere speculation must be avoided, and yet the mental vision, the ‘scientific imagination,’ must be called into service in considering that which so far tran- scends our cruder actual vision as the incomparable atom it- self. There is another reason for considering the nature of Nan address delivered as Vice President before the Chemical Section Anierican Association for the Advancement of Science—Columbus, O., 1899, - 2 JOURNAL OF THE the elements. At several times during the century a wider vision has made it necessary to recast the definition of the elements to accord with increasing knowledge. It would seem as if another such period of change were approaching. There may be need of a truer definition, and how shall this be realized or the new definition properly fitted unless the knowledge gained be summed up and appreciated? The conception of an element among the Greek philoso- phers and the earlier alchemists was very different from the modern idea. ‘This conception sprang from the theories as to the formation of the material universe. ‘The elements were the primal forms of matter seen only combined, impure, 1m- perfect. They were the essences or principles out of which all things were evolved. In the four-element theory, which was so widely spread among the ancients, the fire, air, earth and water were not the ordinary substances known under these names, but the pure essences bestowing upon fire and water their peculiar properties. These essences were not thought of as actual substances capable of aseparate materi- al existence, and gradually the belief that a transmutation was possible between them sprang up. Thus they themselves might be derived from some one of them, as fire or water. The Thalesian theory deriving all things from water was es- pecially popular and was not completely overthrown until the modern era. When, later on, the alchemists conceived of all metals as composed of sulphur and mercury it was an essence or spirit of mercury that was meant. Certain common characteristics as luster, malleability, fusibility, combustibility, etc.,natural- ly led them to think of the metals as belonging to the same order of substances containing the same _ princi- ples, the relative proportions and purity of which deter- mined the variations in the observed properties. Thus the properties of the metals depended upon the purity of the mer- cury and sulphur in them, the quantities of them and their degree of fixation. The more easily a metal was oxidized on being heated, the more sulphur it contained, and this sulphur also determined its changeability. The more malleable it ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 3 was, the more mercury entered into its composition. If only something could be found which would remove the grossness from these essences, some unchanging, all-powerful essence, which, because of their search for it, gradually became known as the ‘philosophers’ stone,’ then the baser metals might be transmuted into the noble gold when the sulphur and mercury were perfectly balanced and free from all dis- tempers. As has been said, these principles entering, all or some of them, into every known substance, were supposed to be not necessarily capable of individual existence themselves. This was the view held by the followers of Aristotle. With the. reaction against the domination of the scholiasts, other views began to be held. It was Boyle who first gave voice to these changed views in his ‘Sceptical Chymist’ (1661). He defined elements as ‘‘certain primitive bodies, which, not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the in gredients of which all those called perfectly mixed bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved.” He, however, did not believe himself warranted, from the knowledge then possessed, in clainting the positive existence of such elements. But little attention was paid to the subject by the subse- quent chemists. The phlogistics were too much occupied with their theory of combustion, and none could see the bear- ing of this question and its importance to exact science. _ Macquer, in his ‘Dictionary of Chemistry’ (1777), words his definition as follows: ‘‘Those bodies are called elements which are so simple that they cannot by any known means be decomposed or even altered and which also enter as principles or constituent parts, into the combination of other bodies,” To this he adds: ‘‘The bodies in which this simplicity has been observed are fire, air and purest earth.” In all of this may be observed the resolution of observed forms of matter into primal principles following the dream of Lucretius and the early Epicurean philosophers, a dream abandoned by the atomic school following, though largely holding to the same definition. 4 JOURNAL OF THE It was only when chemists began to realize that mere obser- vation of properties, chiefly physical, was not sufficient that the subject began to clear up and lose its vagueness. Black proved that certain substances were possessed of a constant and definite composition and fixed properties, unalterable and hence simple bodies or elements. Lavoisier finally cleared the way for the work of the nineteenth century by his defini- tion that ‘‘an element is a substance from which no simpler body has yet been obtained; a body in which no change causes a diminution of weight. Every substance is to be re- garded asan element until it is proved to be otherwise.” With this clear definition to build upon, a rational system of chemistry became, for the first time, a possibility. Thus the elements were recognized as simple bodies be- cause there were no simpler. They were not complex or com- pound. ‘This distinction was clearly drawn between bodies simple and bodies compound, and the name simple body has been frequently used as a synonym for element through a large part of this century. Naturally the question of simplic- ity was first settled by an appeal to that great arbiter of chemical questions, the balance. And, quite as naturally, many blunders were made and the list of bodies erroneously supposed to be simple was very large. All whose weight could not be reduced were considered elementary. When, however, from stich a body, something of lesser weight could be produced, its supposed simplicity was, of course, dis- proved. This test for the elemental character has been clung to per- sistently, and is perhaps still taught, although it was long ago recognized that many of the elements existed in different forms, a pheriomenon to which Berzelius gave the name a//o- tropism. One only of these could be the simplest, and the others could be reduced to this one and rendered specifically lighter. With the discovery of this relation it should have been quite apparent that the old definition would no longer hold good. But many years passed before chemists were made to feel that a new definition was necessary, and adapted one to the newer knowledge. ELISHA MITCHE1,.L SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 5 The insight into what Lucretius would call ‘the nature of things’ was becoming clearer; the mental grasp upon these elusive atoms about which the old Epicurean reasoned so shrewdly was becoming firmer. Through what one must re- gard as the veil interposed by the earlier idea of the element, the chemist began to grope after the constituent particle or atom. It must be borne in mind that the definition of the element was largely formulated before the resuscitation of the atomic theory by Dalton, and the mental picture of the one has perhaps retarded the clearing up of the ideas concerning the other. From the atomic point of view the element was next defined as one in which the molecules or divisible particles were made up of similar indivisible particles. This afforded an easy explanation of allotropism as achange in the num- ber of atoms in a molecule. As Remsen says: ‘‘An element is a substance made up of atoms of the same kind; a com- pound is a substance made up of atoms of unlike kind,” Laying aside, then, all vaguely formulated ideas of essen- ces, or principles, or simple bodies, or elemental forms, we found our present building upon the conception of the ulti- mate particle, be this molecule or atom. As to this atom some clear conception is needed, and here we come to the crux of the modern theories. The chemist re- gards this atom as a particle of matter and is unwilling to ac- cept the theory of Boscovich that is infinitely small, and hence a mathematical point,nor can he admit that it is mere- ly a resisting point, and hence that all matter is but a system of forces. And yet it seems as though some authorities would lead up to such a conclusion. While we need not consider these atoms as mere centers of forces, we are compelled to study them by the operation of forces upon them. What are called their properties have been studied and recorded with great care. These proper- ties are evinced in the action of the forces upon matter, and the exhibition of force without matter cannot be admitted. This study of the properties has been the especial occupation of the century now closing, and so the elemental atom has come to be regarded as a collection of properties. As Pat- terson-Muir puts it (Alchemical Essence and the Chemical 6 JOURNAL OF THE Elements, p. 31): ‘The name copper is used to distinguish a certain group of properties, that we always find associated together, from other groups of associated properties, and if we do not find the group of properties connoted by the term copper we do not find copper.” These properties are exhibited by the action of a small group of forces. Perhaps we do not know all of the forces; certain it is that we do not accurately know all of the proper- ties, but, to quote Patterson-Muir again: ‘‘The discovery of new properties always associated with a group of properties we call copper would not invalidate the statement that cop- per is always copper.” The properties of an atom are either primary, inherent and as unchanging as the atom itself, or they are secondary and dependent upon the influence of the other atoms, or varying with the change of conditions. To the first class belong such properties as the atomic weight, atomic heat, specific grav- ity, etc.; to the second, chemical affinity, valence, etc. Inall the study of the atom the distinction between these should be carefully mainta:ned in order that there may be clear think- ing. There is no field of mental activity requiring more faith than that of the chemist. He is dealing with the ‘evidences of things unseen.’ He must not be content with the mere gathering of facts, but divine what he can of their deeper meaning. Kew chemists have had such insight as Graham into the significance of even the simplest changes. He was not content with mere surface observation. Even the com- monest phenomena were to him full of meaning as to the atoms and their ‘eternal motion.’ ‘Thorpe (Essays in Histor- ical Chemistry, p. 219) has drawn afresh the attention of the chemists to the thoughtful words of this great thinker. His mind was filled with the fascinating dream of the unity of matter. ‘‘In all his work,” says Adam Smith, ‘‘we find him steadily thinking on the ultimate composition of bodies. He searches after it in following the molecules of gases when diffusing; these he watches as they flow into a vacuum or in- to other gases, and observes carefully as they pass through ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 7 tubes, noting the effect of weight, of composition, upon them in transpiration. He follows them as they enter into liquids and pass out, and as they are absorbed or dissolved by colloid bodies; he attentively inquires if they are absorbed by metals in a similar manner, and finds remotest analogies which, by their boldness, compel one to stop reading and to think if they really be possible.” In his paper entitled ‘Speculative Ideas respecting the Con- stitution of Matter,’ published in the Proceedings of the Roy- al Society in 1863, which Thorpe calls his ‘Confession of Faith,’he tells of his conception that these supposed elements of ours may possess one and the same ultimate or atomic molecule existing in different conditions of movement. It is not possible for me, in the limits of this address, to array before you all of the various evidence which leads to the belief that our so-called elementary atoms are after all but compounds of an intimate, peculiar nature whose dissocia- tion we have as yet been unable to accomplish. When prop- erly marshalled, it gives a very staggering blow to the old faith. Thorpe speaks of the ‘‘old metaphysical quibble con- cerning the divisibility or indivisibility of the atom.” To Graham ‘‘the atom meant something which is not divided, not something which cannot be divided.” The original indi- visible atom may be something far down in the make-up of the molecule. How shall the question as to the composite nature of the elements be approached? The problem has been attacked from the experimental side several times during the last half cen- tury, but the work seems to have been carried on after a de- sultory fashion and was soon dropped, as if the workers were convinced of its uselessness. The results, being negative, simply serve to show that no method was hit upon for decomposing the elements upon which the experiments were performed. Thus, for instance,Despretz performed a number of experiments to combat Dumas’ views as to the composite nature of the elements. Despretz made use of the well- known laboratory methods for the separation and purification of substances. Such were distillation, electrolysis, fractional 8 , JOURNAL OF THE precipitation, etc. Such work was quite inadequate to settle the question, as Dumas had pointed out that unustial methods must be used, or, he might have added, the old methods car- ried out to an unusual or exhaustive extent. Certainly, if a moderate application of the usual methods was sufficient for this decomposition, evidences of it would have been obtained long ago by the host of careful workers who have occupied themselves over these substances. Crookes has busied him- self with the method of fractional precipitation (though not with special view to the testing of this question), and applied it most patiently and exhaustively to such substances as the rare earths, without obtaining results from which anything ~ conclusive could be drawn, Victor Meyer seems to have_be- lieved that the decomposition could be effected by high tem- peratures, and was very hopeful of experiments which he had planned before his untimely death. Others have spasmodic- ally given a little time to the problem, but no one has thought highly enough of it to attack it with all of his en- ergy. Let us stop a moment and ask ourselves what would be at- tained if any one should succeed in decomposing an element by one of the usual methods. Has not this been done repeat- edly in the past and merely served to add to the list of the elements? Didymium has been made to yield praseo-and neo- dymium. ‘That which was first called yttrium has been di- vided into erbium, terbium and ytterbium, and according to Crookes may possibly be still further decomposed. But these and similar decompositions are not generally accepted as of- fering any evidence that elements can be decomposed. It is merely the discovery of one or more new substances which have remained hidden in constant association with known bodies which were supposed to be simple. It would be nec- essary to prove that a single individual element had, by the process adopted, been actually decomposed and not some pre- existing impurity discovered. This, of course, would be ex- ceedingly difficult, and all such attempts as those mentioned can have little bearing upon the general question, and can hold out slight hope of reward beyond the fame springing from the discovery of a new element. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 9 Successful decomposition should meam much more. It should mean the discovery of a method which will decompose not one, but many or indeed, all of the elements, and the de composition of these must not yield a larger number of sup- posedly simple bodies, but a small group of one or two or three which are common constituents of all. It is quite idle to venture upon any prediction whether such a method will ever be discovered. Setting aside, then, the direct experi- mental proof of the composite nature of the elements as unat- tainable at present, let us next examine the indirect evidence. It would seem wisest for the present to introduce under that heading the spectroscopic work of Lockyer. The results, while highly interesting, are too indefinite as yet to speak of as having a direct bearing, Yet a careful study of the spec- tra of the elements leads us to a strong suspicion that the less plausible assumption is the one that the particles which gwive rise to such varied vibrations are simple and unitary in nature. Lockyer’s most recent work, following up the line of his ‘Working Hypothesis’ of twenty years ago,is very sug- gestive and may lead to important results (Chemistry of the Hottest Stars, Roy. Soc. Proc., LXI., 148; On the Order of Appearance of Chemical Substances at Different Tempera- tures, Chem. News, 79, 145). Still too much must be assum- ed yet for such work to be very conclusive. He writes of ‘proto-magnesium and proto-calcium,’ and Pickering discuss- es a ‘new hydrogen,’ all with an assurance and confidence which proves at least how deeply these changes in the spec- tra have impressed some of those who have most carefully studied them. But a more important method of indirectly testing the question is through a comparison of the properties of the atoms. Such a comparison has been made as to the atomic weights. In other words, the idea of the compos- ite nature of the elements followed very close upon the adop- tion of a stricter definition of them as simple bodies. Dal- ton, Prout, Débereiner, Dumas, Cooke and many others have aided in developing the idea, sometimes faultily and harmful- ly, at other times helpfully. Some fell into the common er- ror of going too far, but all were struck by the fact that 10 JOURNAL OF THE when these combining numbers, or atomic weights, were compared strange and interesting symmetries appeared. The times were not ripe for an explanation of their meaning, and such crude assumptions as that of Prout, that the elements were composed of hydrogen, or that of Low, that they were made up of carbon and hydrogen, were too baseless to com- mand much genuine support or to withstand much careful analysis. The important feature of agreement between such theories was the belief that the elements were composite and had one or more common constituents. From the comparison of one property, the atomic weights, the next step was to the comparison of all the properties. This comparison is brought out clearest and best for us in the Periodic System. Hereall the properties are very care- fully tabulated for us. The study of the system leads indis- putably to the conviction that this is not an arbitrary, but a natural arrangement, exceedingly simple in its groundwork, but embodying most fascinating symmetries, which hint of great underlying laws. He who looks upon it as a mere table of atomic weights has lost its meaning. It tells, with no un- certain note, of the kinship of the elements and ieads to a search after the secret of their interdependence and of their common factor or factors. There is so much which is made clearer if we assume a composite nature for the elements that many do not hesitate to make the assumption. Still another indirect method of approaching that problem is by analogy with bodies whose nature and composition are known. A very striking symmetry is observed between the hydrocarbons, and these in the form of compound radicals show a strong resemblance to certain of the elements. This analogy need not be dwelt upon here. It has been recog- nized for a long time and tables of hydrocarbons have been constructed after the manner of the Periodic System. Now these bodies are simply built up of carbon and hydrogen in varying proportions, and in any one homologous series the increments are regular. We know that they are composite and that they have but two common factors, carbon and hy- drogen. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY pT Again, the fact that certain groups of associated atoms be- have as one element and closely resemble known elements may be taken as a clue to the nature of the elements. Thus carbon and nitrogen, in the form of cyanogen, behave very much like the halogens; and nitrogen and hydrogen in the form of ammonia so closely resemble the group of elements known as the alkalies that this ‘‘volatile alkali” was classed with them before the era of our elements and the analogy lead to a vain search for an ‘‘alkalizing principle” and later to an equally futile pursuit of the metal ammonium. A further clue to this nature is afforded in the remarkable changes of properties which can be brought about in some elements by ordinary means, and one might mention the equally remarkable veiling of properties induced by the com- bining of two or more atoms. Thus copper exists in a cu- prous and a cupric condition, and the change from one to the other can be readily brought about. And this is true of many other elements. This has doubtless been a tedious enumeration to you of well-known facts and arguments, but it has been necessary, for I wish to lead you to the summing-up of these arguments and to induce you to draw boldly the necessary deductions. It is high time for chemists to formulate their opinions in this matter. It would seem as if we were shut up to one or two conclusions. Either these imagined simple bodies are after all compounds, built up of two or more common constit- uents, or they are but varying forms of one and the same kind of matter subjected to different influences and conditions. The supposition that they are distinct and unrelated simple bodies is, of course, a third alternative, but to my mind this is no longer tenable. The second hypothesis is the one put forth by Graham. It was his cherished vision of the gaseous particles about which he thought so deeply, andinmany ways sotruly. Thorpe has written of this as follows (loc. cit. 222): ‘‘He conceives that the various kinds of matter, now rec- ognized as different elementary substances, may possess one and the same ultimate or atomic molecule existing in differ- ent conditions of movement. Graham traces the harmony 12 JOURNAL OF THE this hypothesis of the essential unity of matter with the equal action of gravity upon all bodies. He recognizes that the numerous and varying properties of the solid and liquid, no less than the few grand and simple features of the gas, may all be dependent upon atomic and molecular mobility. Let us imagine, he says, one kind of substance only to exist —ponderable matter; and, further, that matter is divisible into ultimate atoms, uniform in size and weight. We shall have one substance and a common atom. With the atom at rest the uniformity of matter would be perfect. But the atom possesses always more or less motion, due, it must be assumed, to a primordial impulse. ‘This motion gives rise to volume. The more rapid the movement, the greater the space occupied by the atom, somewhat as the orbit of a plan- et widens with the degree of projectile velocity. Matter is thus made to differ only in being lighter or denser matter. The specific motion of an atom being inalienable, light mat- ter is no longer convertible into heavy matter. In short, matter of different density forms different substances—differ- ent inconvertible elements, as they have been considered.” The hypothesis that the elements are built up of two or more common constituents has a larger number of supporters and would seem more plausible. Some have supposed one such primal element by the condensation or polymerization of which the others were formed. Thus we have the hydrogen theory of Prout, modified to the one-half atom by Dumas, and finally by Zangerle to the one-thousandth hydrogen atom. The suggestion of Crookes as to the genesis of the elements from the hypothetical pvoty/e, under the influence of electrici- ty, may also be mentioned here. Others have adopted the supposition of two elements, Rey- nolds making one of these an element with a negative atomic weight, whatever that may mean. Low and others have fixed upon carbon and hydrogen as the two elements. There are many practical difficulties in the way of these suppositions ; the lack of uniformity in the differences be- tween the atomic weights, the sudden change of electro-chem- ical character, and the impossibility, so far, of discovering ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 13 any law underlying the gradation in the properties of the elements with the increase of atomic weights, are some of the difficulties. In comparing these two hypotheses that of Graham seems to me very improbable. I have thought of valence as dependent upon the character of the motion of the atom, but cannot well conceive of a similar dependence of atomic weight and all the other properties. ‘There remains, then, the hypotheses of primal elements by the combination of which our elements have been formed. ‘These molecules are probably distinguished from the ordinary molecules by the actual contact and absolute union of the ia ica atoms without the intervention of ether. Since these elemental molecules cannot as yet be divided, we may retain the name atom for them, but the idea of sim- plicity and homogeneity no longer belongs to them. The definition of an element as a body made up of similar atoms is equally lacking in fidelity to latest thought and belief, but chemists would scarcely consent to change it, and, indeed, it may well be retained provided the modified meaning is given to the word atom. But, after all, an element is best defined by means of its properties, It is by close study of these that we decide upon its elemental nature, and through them it is tested. Complete reliance can no longer be placed upon the balance and the supposed atomic weight. All elements are acted upon by gravity and chemical force and other physical forces, but within the last few years cer- tain gaseous elements have been discovered which are not in- fluenced by chemical force or affinity, According to some (Piccini, Zezts. An. Chem. X1X, 295) this necessitates a divis- ion of the elements into two classes. Manifestly, since it is chiefly by the action of chemical force that we study the ele- ments, the absence of such action cuts us off from our chief means of finding out anything about them, and it is equally clear that bodies so diverse cannot well be classified together. If all attempts at bringing about the chemical union of these gaseous elements with other bodies fail, I believe that we should insist upon the existence of two classes of elements and keep them distinct in all comparisons. 14 JOURNAL OF THE Of course, we are quite at a loss to say just what chemical force is, but it is believed to be determined by the electrical condition of the atom. ‘Thus we have the elements which show the action of chemical affinity varying from strongly electro-positive to strongly negative. This electrical charge of the atom seems to be a primitive, inherent property, and so beyond our control or power tochange. At least no change of the kind has ever been recognized and recorded. Sodium remains positive and chlorine negative in spite of all that may be done to them. We can, by uniting the two tempo- rarily, cloak and neutralize their opposite natures, but the original condition returns on their release, Is it not fair to assume that argon, helium and’ their com- panion gases, having no affinity, are without electrical charge —atoms from which the electrical charge has been with- drawn; the deadest forms of inanimate matter? Were they thus without electro-chemical properties and affinity from the beginning, or did they start out as ordinary atoms (if I may so call them), and somehow, somewhere lose these properties, and with them the power of entering into union of any kind, even of forming molecules, doomed to unending single ex- istence? Can these be changed atoms of some of our well- known elements, a step nearer to the primal elements and with the electrical charge lost? Is it possible for us to bring about these changes? May we not unwittingly have done so at some time or other in the past? Is it possible to restore the electrical charge to such atoms, and so to place them once more on a footing of equality with elements of the conven- tional type? These and many other questions surge through the mind as one thinks of these wonderful gases. Perhaps the coming century will unfold the answers. THE NATURE OF VALENCE. By F. P. VENABLE. 1 The term ‘‘ valence” is variously defined as the ‘‘combining capacity,” or ‘‘capacity of saturation,” ‘‘quantitative com- bining power,” or ‘‘chemical value of the atom.” It is well known that the introduction of this idea into chemistry was due to the development of. the type theory, a system which had at first purely empirical basis. Sixty years ago there was still some hesitation as to the acceptance of the atomic theory or the need for such a theory. Much use was made of the term equivalent, which had been Wollaston’s expedient for avoiding the difficulties arising from the full adoption of the theory of atoms. | Wollaston had been himself very far from consistent in the use of the term. The numbers called by him ‘equivalent weights’ were not infrequently atomic and molecular weights and fully as hypothetical as the so-called atomic weights of Dalton. Inthe later use of the term it signified solely the numbers obtained by analysis without the introduction of any theoretical considerations. Thus, on analyzing ammonia, the ratio N’: Hse is gotten, and therefore the equivalent of nitrogen is 4.6. Strange to say the equivalent given by Wollaston corresponds with the present atomic weight, whereas the atomic weight given by Dalton corresponds with what would be the equiva- lent. It is manifest that the idea of equivalents needed some- thing more than the simple theory of atoms to make it clear and tenable. It embodied two distinct conceptions and if we hold to an atomic theory we must introduce a further explan- atory theory of the saturation capicity of these atoms. This 1 Address, as chairman, delivered before the North Carolina Section, 16 JOURNAL OF THE is the theory of valence or quantivalence or atomicity, and without it the equivalents are purely empirical, and it is most difficult if not impossible to clear up the confusion connected with their use. Returning now to the derivation of this idea of valence from the type theory, according to Wurtz’ the conception of valence was introduced into the science in three steps. First there was the discovery of polyatomic compounds. This term was first used by Berzelius in 1827’, he applying it to such elements as chlorine or fluorine where he thought sever- al atoms of these elements united with a single atom of an- other element. ‘The term was later applied by Graham, Wil- liamson, and others to compounds. The second step was the reference of this polyatomicity to what was called the state of saturation of the radicals con- tained in these compounds. ‘This was largely through the work of Williamson and Gerhardt. Thirdly, this conception of saturation was extended to the elements themselves. ‘This was chiefly due to the work of Frankland upon the organo-metallic compounds. And so valence has come to refer to the number of atoms with which a single atom of any element will combine. This conception has then been one of slow growth, gradu- ally incorporating itself into the science as the necessity arose of devising a suitable explanation for accumulated observa- tions. It was a logical outcome of and was evolved from knowledge acquired step by step. It was no mere speculation or hypothesis, such as that of Prout, evolved by the fancy or imagination of one man and suddenly appearing with” scarcely a claim to foundation upon observed fact. This conception enters into the chemical theory of to-day almost as fundamentally as the atomic theory itself. Its ap- plication is of every-day occurrence and of the most varied character, and yet chemists admit that the nature of valence is one of their chief puzzles and they have advanced but little towards its solution during the past half century. It is quite 1 Historie des doctrines chimiques, p. 69. 2Jsb. d. Chem., 7, 89. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 17 possible that the ideas to be advanced in the further discus- sion of this subject in this paper will meet with opposition. Certainly they should be fully and freely discussed if they are worthy of it. I believe that they form astep toward the clearing up of the mystery of valence. It is necessary, however, first to trace somewhat further the development of the original conception. One of its ear- liest and most important applications was to the study of the constitution of the compounds of carbon. Here Kekulé as- sumed for carbon a constant valence of four, and this idea is still dominant in theories relating to the constitution of these bodies, It was quite natural then that the first belief should have been in a constant valence. It was speedily found, however, that in certain cases, as in the compounds of nitro- gen and phosphorus, this belief was scarcely tenable. There were efforts at making it hold good, as, for instance, a dis- tinction was drawn between atomic and molecular com- pounds, but all of these suggestions have been proved unsat- isfactory. - We unquestionably have to account for the existence of a compound with three atoms and another with five atoms in the cases of nitrogen and phosphorus and there are many sim- ilar anomalies. Here the valence seems to vary toward one and the same element. Cases might be multiplied to show also that it varies often towards different elements. Thus it frequently happens that the valence of an element towards hydrogen seems to be quite different from that exhibited to- ward oxygen. For a long time there was much straining to consider the valence of an element always the same but this effort is, in large measure, abandoned now as unavailing and chemists admit that valence is not constant but variable and may even vary towards one and the same element. The doctrine of valence has had much added to it about bonds, affinities, and linkage, the necessity for which one may well question. Certainly the misuse of the word affinity, see- ing its other and greater use, should be earnestly discounten- anced. I am inclined to think that the other terms bring in false and misleading ideas which should be carefully guarded 2 18 JOURNAL OF THE against. Atany rate all hypothetical talk about strong bonds, and weak bonds, double bonds and triple is to be avoided? If then valetice varies, can it be an inherent property of the unchanging atoms? Experiments have shown that it varies with the nature of the combining element, that it varies with the temperature and with other conditions. It is not depend- ent upon the atomic weight in the same sense as other prop- erties are dependent upon it. ‘Thus in the same group the valence remains the same whether the atoms weigh nine times as much as hydrogen or two hundred times as much. We seem shut up to the conclusion that valence is not one of the primitive inherent properties of the atom but is rela tive, It is rather to be regarded as the resultant of the mutu- al influence of the atoms of the combining elements, The clear grasping of this idea is an importhant step forward. Unfortunately the distinction is not always made nor consist- ently adhered to. It may not be amiss to cite here the utterance of Lothar Meyer in regard to the question of a constant or variable va- lence:? ‘*Since the aim of all scientific investigation is to exhibit the most variable phenomena as dependent upon certain active invariable factors taking part in them and in such a manner that each phenomenon appears to be the necessary result of the properties and reciprocal action of these factors, then itis clear that chemical investigation would be considerably ad- vanced were it possible to prove that the composition of chem- ical compounds is essentially determined by the valency of the atoms and the external conditions under which these atoms react upon one another. ‘The first necessary step in this di- rection has been made in the attempt to explain the regulari- ties observed in the composition of chemical compounds, by the assumption of a constant power of saturation or an invaria- ble valency of the atom. The opposite and equally hypothet- ical assumption that the valency is variable leads to no ad- vancement. ‘The first step towards progress in this matter would be 1 Modern Theories of Chemistry, Eng, Trans., p, 303. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 19 made if some hypothesis as to the cause of this variability were proposed. This difference between the two attitudes has seldom been properly realized. While some chemists, accept- ing the constant valency of atoms, have attempted to deduce the varying atomic linking frem one distinct point of view, others have considered it sufficient to have assigned to the atom of a particular element in one compound one valency, and in another compound a different valency, according as this or that value appeared the most suitable, and thus to have given a so-called explanation of the composition of the compounds in question. In this way the fact has been over- looked, that an arbitrary interpretation carried out by means of chosen hypotheses, cannot be regarded as an attempt ata scientific explanation, but is nothing more than an expression of our ignorance of the causal connection of the phenomena An explanation would require that the different valencies as- signed to one and the same element in different compounds, should be traced to a different cause. If, for instance, it is stated that carbon in carbon dioxide possesses double the val- ency which it possesses in carbon monoxide, such a statement is no explanation of the fact thae an atom of carbon in the former compound is combined with twice as much oxygen as in the latter, for such a statement is merely a paraphrase which hides its incompetency by assuming the form of an ex- planation. Although this may be perceived without further remark, still it has frequently occurred during the past few years that similar paraphrases have not only been proposed but also accepted as real explanations of such phenomena. Just as it was formerly supposed that the assumption of a vi- tal force dispensed with a complete investigation of the phe- nomena of animal life, somany chemists have of late thought that they possessed in ‘ variable valency,’ a means of explain- ing the varying stoichiometric relationships which would sat- isfy all claims. Such deceptions can only retard the advance of the science, since they prevent an earnest and thorough in- vestigation of the question, whether each atom is endowed with a property determining and limiting the number of atoms with which it can combine, dependent upon the intrinsic na- 20 JOURNAL OF THE ture of the atom and like it invariable ; or whether this ability is variable and with it the nature of the atom itself.” It is not strange that this line of reasoning should lead Lothar Meyer to doubt the unvarying nature of the atom it- self, and thus losing his grasp upon one invariable to make sure of another. He says: ‘‘It is by no means impossible that the magnitudes which we now style atoms, may be va- riable in their nature.” It will be an unfortunate day for chemists when the belief in the unchanging atom is given up. Chaos will indeed enter into all of our theories when this, the foundation rock, is left at the mercy of every shifting tide of opinion and can be shaken by all manner of unfounded hypotheses. The case cannot be so hopeless as to necessitate calling to our aid so dangerous a doctrine. Before turning to such an expedient let us first make all possible use of our atomic the- ory asitstands. The extension of this theoiy teaches that the atoms are endowed with motion and this motion probably varies in velocity and phases with the different ele- ments. So too when the atoms unite the resulting molecule has a certain motion peculiar go it while the atoms composing it have an intra-molecular motion in which their original mo- tions are probably modified by their influence upon one an- other, It is quite manifest then that a molecule, in order to exist, must maintain a certain equilibrium and harmony be- tween these various motions, and that there can be all degrees of equilibrium from the very stable to that which may be up- set by the least disturbing influence from without. It seems to me that herein we have a full and satisfactory means of explaining the various problems connected with the conception of valence. ‘The question as to whether the atoms of two elements will unite is decided by affinity, which is in some way connected with the electrical condition of these atoms. ‘There is no apparent connection between this and va- lence. ‘The number of atoms which enter into combination forming one molecule is purely a matter of equilibrium and is dependent upon the motion of those atoms. ‘Thus a phospho- rus atom unites with chlorine atoms because of acertain affin- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY Ae ity between them. The number of chlorine atoms with which it will unite depends upon the possibility of harmonizing the respective motions, As the temperature may affect these motions and also impart a more rapid molecular motion, it is evident that the harmony, or equilibrium, will depend upon the temperature and that a temperature may be reached at which no harmony is possible and hence no compound can be formed. ‘The phosphorus atom mentioned can, as we know, form a stable molecule with five atoms of chlorine, On in- creasing the temperature this becomes unstable and only three atoms can be retained. Neither with four atoms nor with two is there harmony of motion. A sufficiently high temper- ature may prevent any harmony of motion whatever being at- tained and hence union may become impossible. As to other influences than those of temperature, we can see that the equilibrium between the atom of phosphorus and the five atoms af chlorine may be upset by such a molecule coming within the influence, electrical or vibratory, of a mol- ecule of water. The atoms must rearrange themselves for a new state of equilibrium and so an atom of oxygen takes the place of two atoms of chlorine, giving again a condition of harmony. In other cases the motion of the molecule of water may be of such a character as to directly harmonize with that of the original molecule and so to enter into equilibrium with it, a definite number of such molecules of water affording a condition of maximum stability. This we call water of crys- tallization. Such:'molecules would be more or less easily sep- arated by an increase of temperature and where several mole- cules of water were attached the highest temperature would be necessary for freeing the original molecule from the last water molecule. | A carbon atom finds its most perfect state of equilibrium where four atoms of hydrogen or their equivalent move in har- mony with it. But there is a second state of equilibrium where only half that number of atoms are moving with it. This state does not seem to be a possibility where there are hydrogen atoms but is readily possible where the equivalent number of oxygen atoms is concerned. Such a molecule, how- 22 JOURNAL OF THE ever, is always in a condition to take up additional atoms until its highest equilibrium is reached and in doing this it proceeds by the regular steps needed for bringing about a harmony of motion. A molecule in a lower state of equilibrium we have become accustomed to call unsaturated, calling that one satu- rated which is in its highest state of equilibrium. The fur- ther application of this hypothesis is easily made and need not be dwelt upon here, It will be helpful in many ways. This theory of valence makes it clear why it should vary toward the same element under different conditions. It is also clear that it might vary towards different elements as these are very possibly possessed of different motions. It is further evident that it is in accord with the conclusion that valence is not an inherent property of the individuai atom but is the re- sultant of the influence upon each other of the combining atoms, Only one point remains to be considered: Why do the. ele- ments of the same group have practically the same valence? The nearest answer to this, and it seems satisfactory, is that they are all possessed of the same phase or kind of motion. In other words the natural division into periods gives us seven or eight more or less different phases. These are, in large meas- ure, independent of the atomic weight. And so the elements in any given group have the same tendency towards similar states of equilibrium in forming compounds with any other ele- ment, as hydrogen or oxygen. Some elements, as copper, mercury, tin, etc., are peculiar in that they may change their phase of motion under certain influences, acting then as if they belonged to different groups and entering into totally different states of equilibrium in forming their compounds, Lastly it is possible for a combination of atoms of different elements, as NH* or CN, to have such molecular and intra- molecular motion that, although not in a state of equilibrium themselves, they are capable of entering into such states just as the single atoms of elements do, having apparently similar valence. I might develop this theory much further but it is unneces- sary now. Enough has been said to show that such an appli- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 23 cation of the atomic theory is most highly important as a step towards the clearing up of the problems springing from the conception of valence and from the periodic system. NVote.—Since certain points in this paper require treatment at greater length than was practicable in an address, it will be followed by a second paper elaborating such portions. THE NATURE OF VALENCE. [SECOND PAPER | As the preceding paper upon this subject was in the form of an address before one of the local sections of the society, the hypothesis as to the cause of valence there suggested was given in outline only and could not be enlarged upon as far as may have been necessary. In the present paper it is proposed to elaborate certain points and to test, as far as possible, the reasonable nature of the hypothesis. While the whole subject of valence has been much catPuseny and the use of some of the terms connected with it unfortun- ate, no part of it has given greater trouble than its variabil- ity. This is the very point, however, which affords the best clew to its solution and should therefore be treated at some length. The most instructive cases of varying valence are those where the variation is shown towards the same element, as in the compounds PCl, and PCI,, FeCl, and FeCl,, Hg,O and HgO, CO and CO,, and many other similar compounds. There are two possible views regarding these. Hither the valence varies or the valence remains the same aud the differences are explained by some such assumption as that of a state of saturation of the atom and of various unsaturated states. 24 JOURNAL OF THE The terms ‘saturated’ and ‘unsaturated’ present a number of anomalies as commonly used. In the first place the term saturated is not always used for that con- dition of the atom in which it is united with the largest number of other atoms. ‘Thus, ferrous oxide (FeO) is called unsaturated, and ferric oxide (Fe,O,) saturated, though there is a larger proportion still of oxygen in fer- ric acid and the ferrates. The same is true of the three series of manganese and chromium compounds. Again the term saturated does not carry with it any defin- ite relation to the stability of the compound. Sometimes the compound called unsaturated, and containing the least num- ber of atoms is the most stable, sometimes that with the larg- est number. Phosphorus trichloride is more stable than the pentachloride, but the pentoxide is more stable than the tri- oxide. The most stable of the manganese compounds are the so-called unsaturated manganous salts; in the case of chrom- ium it would appear to be the chromic salts. In the case of carbon the saturated compounds are the most stable. It is manifest that these two terms cannot cover all cases of com- bination for a number of elements. It would seem wiser and simpler then to speak of the valence directly when discussing the elements, as bivalent carbon or quadrivalent carbon; bi- valent or trivalent iron, etc. In the case of carbon com- pounds the terms have acquired a somewhat different mean- ing and are too thoroughly incorporated in the literature for achange to be suggested. Saturated here means a com- pound which can take on no further atoms by addition, while an unsaturated compound can have such atoms add- ed. Certain cases of change of valence, as in cuprous and cup- ric compounds, mercurous and mercuric, ferrous and ferric, etc., have been looked upon as presenting some peculiar rela- tionships, Such cases are spoken of by some as if they oc- curred among positive elements only. It is not clear how any distinction can be drawn between these and the classes phosphorus and phosphoric, sulphurous and sulphuric, ni- ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 35 trous and nitric, chlorous and chloric, etc. A possible dis- tinction might be made that the more negative the element the greater the number of changes of valence; the more pos- itive the element the less variation in valence is observed. This would be an approximation only. So great is the difference caused by this variation in the valence that some have even thought it best to atrange what have been called the lower and higher stages under different groups. ‘Thus Mendeléeff placed cuprous copper in Group I, and cupric copper in Group VIII; aurous gold in Group I and auric gold in Group VIII. Such an arrangement would, how- ever, greatly confuse the periodic system. Mercury,thallium, chromium. manganese, phosphorus, arsenic, sulphur, selen- ium, and others would have to be similarly provided for. It is better to retain them in the positions to which their atomic weights would assign them and to study them more thorough- ly, so that we may understand why certain elements, as cop- per, gold, and mercury show this peculiarity while others closely akin to them, as silver, zinc, and cadmium, do not. In studying the nature of valence from the standpoint of its variability, the means by which these variations can be brought about must have an important bearing upon the sub- ject. ‘There are a number of these agencies. Light.—It is a matter of common observation that light can bring about physical, and the most varied chemical, transformations. In some cases it is apparent that the trans- formation is one from a higher to a lower valence or vice ver- sa. ‘Thus, certain mercurous compounds can be changed to mercuric. Hg,O = HgO+Heg. An alcoholic solution of ferric chloride is changed by light to ferrous chloride. 2FeCl,+C,H,O = 2FeCi,4+-C,H,O-+2HCI1. Ferric oxalate under the influence of light gives off carbon dioxide and becomes ferrous oxalate. Fe,(C,0,);=2Fe(C,O,)+2CO,. — An alcoholic solution of cupric chloride becomes cuprous 26 JOURNAL OF THE chloride. Mercuric chloride in aqueous solution is slowly changed to mercurous when exposed to the light. 2H¢gCl,+ H,O =-2HgCl4+ 2HC1+0. Gold chloride (AuCl,), in contact with organic substances, when exposed to light, is changed first to aurous chloride (AuCl) and then to metallic gold. It is quite well known that aray of light falling upon a piece of selenium changes its conducting power for electric- ity. This is not a change of valence but has, it would seem, its bearing upon the problem as a possible change in vibra- tion. The chemical action of light is generally attributed to the vibrations set up among the molecules. Rays having the shortest wave-lengths and the greatest frequency are most active in this respect though all the rays of the visible spec- trum have been shown to exert some action. So far as this variation in valence is caused by light then the hypothesis of a change in vibration necessitating a change in equilibrium may well serve as an explanation. Heat.—Again these variations are often easily brought about by changes of temperature. Thus cupric chloride be- comes cuprous chloride. CuCl, =CuCl+Cl. Mercurous chloride is temporarily changed into mercuric, the mercurous re-forming npon cooling. 2H¢gCl—=H¢g+ HgCl,. Phosphorus pentachloride becomes the trichloride. PC1,=PCl, + Cl,. Arsenic pentoxide becomes trioxide. | As,O,= As,0,+O,. An interesting series of changes are those in the sulphur chlorides. Thus sulphur tetrachloride (SCl,) becomes sul- phur dichlorine (SCl,), if warmed above —22°, and this be- comes sulphur monochloride (S,Cl,), if heated above 64°. This last can be boiled without change. These instances might be multiplied but it is not necessary. The most plausible explanation offered as to the effect of ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 27 heat is a change in the velocity of vibration, and it may is serve to explain the variations caused in valence. Electricity.—Changes of valence due to electricity are prob- ably not unusual but few observations concerning them have been recorded. One of the most noteworthy is the produc- tion of carbon monoxide from carbon dioxide by the passage of the electric spark. CO,=CO-+0. Chemical Action.—The most usual method of bringing about a change of valence is by chemical action. When the change is from a higher proportion of the negative element to a lower itis commonly called reduction, and the reverse change is spoken of as oxzdation. 'These terms are apparent- ly relics of an older theory, and are confusing, cspecially to a student beginning the study of chemistry. They should be limited to cases of the actual removal or addition of oxygen. Thus, to speak of the change of ferrous to ferric chloride by the action of chlorine as an oxidation is careless and incor- Fect. FeCl,+Cl=FeCl,. It is pushing the type theory rather far to speak of the salts of one valence as being derived from the oxide of that val- ence and yet this is frequently done. When we take ferric chloride and let sulphurous acid act upon it, it is called a reduction of the ferric chloride to fer- rous chloride, although certainly no oxygen is removed from the ferric chloride nor-is oxygen added when the ferrous chloride is changed again to ferric chloride by the action of nitric acid, and still this is called an oxidation. The use of terms for these reactions is evidentiy in need of revision. What shall we call the following reaction, cited by Drechsel as an ‘‘oxidizing action?” 2K MnO,+10FeSO,+8H,S0,= 5Fe,(SO,),+K,SO,+-2MnS0,+8H,0. Some hydrogen is oxidized with the formation of water but that is not what is meant. The manganese is changed from its highest valency to its lowest and the iron from its low- 28 JOURNAL OF THE est to a higher. The permanganate is of course. deoxidiz- ed. | It seems that chemical action may induce change when to an existing molecule a third substance is offered capable of combining with one or more of its constituent atoms, thus re- leasing the former equilibrium. Thus when sulphurous acid takes the oxygen of water setting hydrogen free the hydro- gen then takes one of the chlorine atoms held by the iron. FeCl,+H,SO,+H,O=H,SO,.2HC1+2FeCl,. But the presence of all three of these molecules is needed for the reaction to take place. So too, potassium perman- ganate is stable in the presence of sulphuric acid, unless the ferrous sulphate or some such molecules are present. When molecules of these three substances come together there is immediate rearrangement of molecules with change of equil- ibrium. Whether we are dealing here with a play of affinity which causes the tumbling down of certain molecules and building up of others, or whether it is a question of vibra- tory equilibrium between these molecules, cannot yet be told. The only certain thing seems to be that a molecule contain- ing bivalent iron and another containing septivalent man- ganese cannot exist in the presence of one another but must change, when possible, to trivalent iron and bivalent man- ganese. As meagre as our present knowledge is, it does not seem to be a very hopeful task to enter the maze of changes of val- ence through chemical reactions with a view to clearing up the ideas as to the nature of valence. Explanations Offered.—Victor Meyer and Riecke have sup- posed that a solution of the problem could be arrived at best by studying the phenomena of frictional electricity, contact electricity, pyro-electricity, and electrolytic conductivity. Most of those who have suggested hypotheses have based them upon a study of the carbon atom and its compounds and in particular its space relations. I have gathered together such of these hypotheses as have come to my notice. The first in point of time is the hypothesis of van’t Hoff’. 1 Ansichten iiber die organische Chemie I. 3. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 29 His idea is that valence is dependent upon the form of the atom... He says; ‘‘The simplest observation teaches that every change from the spherical form must lead to greater changes in the attraction in certain directions, since the atom at these points can, so to say, be more closely approached. Each form of that kind therefore determines a certain num- ber of capacities for attraction or valences.” Ostwald’ comments upon this hypothesis as follows: “Tf we think of valence as a question of a property of the atom, whose action can be modified by the difference in the condition of the atom, especially in its motion, then it is thinkable that although the cause of the valence is un- changeable, the workings of this cause, that is the valence itself seems to differ from case to case. An hypothesis of this kind has in fact been suggested by van’t Hoff. In that he assumed that the chemical attraction between the atoms was'a consequence of gravitation, he showed that if an atom possessed a form differing from the spherical the intensity of the attraction on its surface must possess a definite number of Maxima. ‘The Maxima can be of varying value. If the motion of the atom from heat is en- ergetic only the greatest Maxima will be able to hold their atoms and the valence shows itself to be smaller by higher temperatnres than by lower which-corresponds with observa- tion. Lossen’s’ idea as to valence, deduced from the considera- tion of the theories of van’t Hoff and Wislicenus as to the space relations of the atom, seem to be condensed into the simple sentence: ‘“This conception leads, in my opinion, necessarily to the assumption that the polyvalent atom cannot be regarded asa material point but that rather parts of it are to be distin- guished from which the influence goes out to other atoms.” Wislicenus® expressed his ideas as to valence as follows: ‘‘T consider it not impossible that the carbon atom more or 1 Lehrbuch der allg. Chemie I ed. I, 830. 2Ber. d. Chem. Ges. 20, 3309. 3 Ber. d. Chem. Ges. 21, 581. 30 JOURNAL OF THE less, perhaps right closely, resembles in its form a regular tetrahedron; and further that the cause of those influences which reveal'themselves as units of affinity concentrate them- selves in the corners of this tetrahedron herhaps, and from analogous grounds, just as the electric influences would do from an electrically charged metallic tetrahedron. The real carriers of this energy would be the primitive atoms as the chemical energy of a compound radical is undoubtedly the re- sultant inherent energy of the elementary atoms. Victor Meyer and Riecke' advanced the hypothesis that the atom is surrounded with a spherical shell of ether: the atom is the seat of chemical affinity, the surface of the ether shell that of valence. Hach valence is determined by the presence of two oppositely electrified poles which form the ends of a line short in comparison with the thickness of the shell. The hypothesis of Knorr’ may also be given in brief. He assumes in each atom the presence of Valenzk6rper which have the power of attracting other Valenzkérper. The quantivalence of any atom is determined by the number of these present. | Flawitzky’ takes as a basis tor his hypothesis the sugges- tion of N. Beketoff that the cause of the chemical interaction of the elements lay in the interference or coincidence of the motions of the atoms. The chief assumption is that the atoms of each element described closed curves which lie in planes, which are parallel to one another and have a con- stant absolute position in space. The atoms of different ele- ments move in planes which made definite constant angles with one another. According to Flawitzky, thus, ‘‘the val- ences of the elements can be refered to the differences in the angles between the planes of the paths of the different , atoms.” It is quite possible that other hypotheses as to valence have been formulated but have escaped my notice. These 1 Ber. d. Chem, Ges. 21, 951. Ann. Chem. (Liegbig) 279, 202. 3Ztchr. Amorg. Chem. 12, 182. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 31 will suffice to give the more recent trend of thought upon the subject. I may state that none of these were known to me when the first paper was sent on for publication’ as I had not deemed it necessary to look beyond the usual text-books in examining into the literature upon the subject. This state- ment is not made for personal reasons as that is a matter of small moment, but that there may attach to my hypothesis whatever of value there is in the independent reaching of a conclusion. It is not pertinent to this paper to discuss at any length the citations just given. But a few words are needed to bring out certain differences and distinctions. In most of them we have the assumption of some peculiar form of en- ergy—an ‘‘Anziehungskraft.” Flawitzky alone makes no explicit assumption of the kind. Besides this assumed force, which is the point of contention after all, we have various other assumptions of a remarkable character; ¢. 9., as to the forms of atoms, envelopes, primal atoms, and Valenzkorper. Flawitzky’s hypothesis is based upon the angles made _ be- tween the planes in which the atoms move. Now in the place of all this I wish to substitute that which seems to me to be the simpler hypothesis of vibratory equil- ibrium. There is only one attractive force to be considered and this is called chemical affinity and causes the union of the atoms, binding them together. These atoms may unite atom with atom,or one atom with two or three or more atoms of the other element or other elements, While we speak of union there is no actual contact to be assumed. The indi- vidual atoms have their own motion and at the same time the aggregation of atoms, or molecule, has a motion proper to it. ‘The conditions of equilibrium in such a system deter- mine the number of atoms which can enter it: as one to one, one to two, etc. ‘There is no distinct force of valence deter- mining this. The form of the atoms can scarcely be taken into consideration because the distance between the atoms is too great, compared with the mass of the atom, for the form 1In the Journal of the American Chemical Society, 3 JOURNAL OF THE to exert much influence, unless it influences the character of the motion. The atomic weight also has little influence in determining the number of atoms needed to satisfy the condi- tions of equilibrium except that there seems to be a general rule that with increase in the atomic weight in any one group more stable equilibrium is brought about with the smaller number of atoms and in a choice between several the lesser valence is preferred. (Compare nitrogen and bismuth; sul- phur and tellurium.) There would then appear to be seven, possibly eight,differ- ent kinds of motion among the atoms. Different velocities of vibration are not meant, but different phases of motion. For instance, all may have elliptical orbits with different: focal distances; or circular, with different radii, etc. In any group of elements the motion of the atoms would have one common characteristic but there would be differences in velocity. In the first and seventh group, showing, for the most part, a tendency towards the same equilibrium, or having the same valence, the motion must be closely analogous. So too for the second and sixth groups, the third and fifth. There may then be a necessity for four distinct phases only, unless we suppose a fifth for the eighth group. If the motion of an atom can be changed from one character to another its val- ence is changed and in such general properties as are depen- dent upon motion and not upon atomic weight it is equivalent to changing its group, Electricity, light, heat, and chemical action can cause this change of motion. Insofar the prop- erties of the element are subject to change and within our control. But the other factor, atomic weight, with the prop- erties of the element determined by it, is not subject to change nor within our control, so far as our knowledge goes. While it is freely granted that there is so much of the spec- ulative in what has been said as to make us touch the whole subject with extreme caution, and while it is further admitt- ed that it is quite beyond the reach of present experimental research, yet it is believed that the use of the imagination is legitimate and tends toward the advancement of the science ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 33 so long as the true value is set upon it and fancy is not allow- .ed to obscure fact nor to be mistaken for it. "The hypothesis proposed is simple and if true will be very helpful. It will be a great step forward if it can be shown that the doctrine of valence is a doctrine of vibratory equilibrium. PRELIMINARY CATALOGUE OF THE BIRDS OF CHAPEL HILL, N. C., WITH BRIEF NOTES ON SOME OF THE SPECIES. T. GILBERT PEARSON. INTRODUCTION. In this catalogue are enumerated the species of birds, known to have been observed and positively identified at Chapel Hill. While the list is incomplete, and is presented only as a preliminary catalogue, the author expresses the hope that it may prove of use to those interested in the orni- thology of the region, and that it may serve asa basis for more extended observations. In addition to the enumeration of the species, the paper contains some brief notes on the mi- gration and nesting habits of such forms as have come under the writer’s observation at Chapel Hill. The difficulty of preparing a complete catalogue of the birds may be readily understood when we recall the fact that the bird population is constantly changing, The great wave of the autumnal migration carrying large numbers of north- ern birds past us, at the same time taking many of our sum- mer forms, scarcely subsides, before the swell sets back from the south, sweeping hosts of birds of passage to us on their northern journey. Some migrants found to be numerous during the fall migration may be extremely rare in the spring, and wice versa. Birds which nosmally do not occur in a 3 34 JOURNAL OF THE region are sometimes taken, having wandered, or having been driven by storms far out of their natural range. Incer- | tain species some individuals are always migratory, while others are permanent residents. Again it is well known that a form which is abundant some years, may be seen but rarely or not at all in after years. The changing area of the food products for birds naturally brings about a change in the area of their habitat. Hence it may easily be seen that continual observation during a num- ber of years is absolutely necessary before anything likea complete list of the avz-fauna of a particular region can be hoped for. Data.—My observations on the bird life of Chapel Hill be- gan in September 1897, and were continued up to the follow- ing April; then again from September 1898 until June 1899. With the exception of ten days in the latter part of June 1898, I had no opportunity for studying the region in summer. During the fall migration in 1897, the main part of which extended over the month from September 15 to October 15, a portion of twenty-one days was spent in the field in a special study of the warblers. Sixteen species of warblers were se- cured during this period. In gathering material for the catalogue much assistance was rendered by members of my ornithology class at the Uni- versity of North Carolina, in 1898, and again during the spring of 1899. Of those whose aid has been especially valua- ble, I would mention Mr. George McNider, Mr, E. H. Hartley and Mr. Ivy Lewis. I am indebted also to Dr. Kemp P. Bat- tle, whose close observations on the birds of the neighbor- hood, extending over a period of many years, I found very valuable. In the Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, Part 2 for 1887, Prof. George F. Atkinson published a ‘‘ Pre- liminary Catalogue of the Birds of North Carolina,” in the preface of which he remarks, ‘‘In all, about 120 species have been observed and absolutely identified by myself at Chapel Hill.” In his catalogue, however, Professor Atkinson omits ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 35 to indicate the species which he had there noted. A clipping from the ‘‘ Raleigh News and Observer,” presumably printed about this time has been kindly loaned me by Mrs. R. W. McRae. The clipping contains a ‘‘Preliminary list of birds collected in the vicinity of Chapel Hill,” by Professor Atkin- son. In this communication are enumerated ninety-two species. 'T'wo of the forms there mentioned have not been in- cluded in the present list. The first of these, the tame pigeon (Columbia livia domesticata), is excluded as not being a native wild bird. ‘The other form, the clay-colored sparrow (Spezella pallida), was listed by Professor Atkinson on the strength of asingle specimen. This specimen is still pre- served in the Biological Laboratory, and is a fair type of the swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). In the case of all other birds, included in the News and Observer list, and with which I have not myself met, mention is made of Professor Atkinson as the observer. My own observation in the field, specimens brought in by others from time to time for identification, and Professor At-. kinson’s two papers, constitute the data, from which the pres- ent list has been compiled. In all one hundred and nineteen species of birds at Chapel Hill have actually come under my notice. It may be of use to mention here some of the collections of birds now in North Carolina, which are accessible to the public. Inthe Biological Laboratory at the State University, in Chapel Hill, there is a collection of some 350 skins and mounted specimens, ‘ihe State Agricultural Museum at Raleigh contains a becutiful collection of several hundred mounted birds. The collection of birds in the Museum of Natural History at Guiiford College is numerically nearly as great. All of these collections are constantly growing. The Field.—The field for the study of bird life about Chapel Hill is in many respects a good one. The woods, open fields, small strearis, and underbrush make a varied en- vironment which tends to bring together large numbers of forms. On the other hand the absence, in the immediate 36 JOURNAL OF THE neighborhood, of large streams and ponds, keeps away many varieties of ducks, sandpipers, and birds of similar habits. Terms used.—The nomenclature adopted by the American Ornithologists’ Union is followed, and the vernacular name succeeds the scientific. In some cases well known local names are also added. ‘The terms ‘‘common,” ‘‘rare,” ‘‘ abundant,” etc., which are used in speaking of the occurrence of birds, are of course relative and not altogether satisfactory, but they may convey something of the original idea intended. Family Podicipidae. 1. CoLyMBUS HOLBOELLII (Reinh.) MHolboell’s Grebe. One specimen recorded by Prof. Atkinson, taken at Chapel Hill in 1877. The skin is now preserved in the university collection. | 2. PopILyMBUS PoDICEPS (Linn.) Pied-billed Grebe; Die- dapper; Water-witch. One was shot near town and brought me on November 3, 1897. Others have been taken but the bird probably occurs only in winter. Family Urinatoridae. “> 3. URINATOR IMBER (Gunn.) Loon; Great ,Northern Diver. Occurs only as a migrant or winter visitor. the two specimens in the university collection bear no date of capture. Family Anatidae. 4. Srx sponsa (Linn.) Wood Duck; Summer Ruck. A male in fine plumage was killed in ‘‘!strowd’s low-grounds” from a small flock by Mr. H. E. Mechling on January 3, 1898. Others have been reported at various times. Possibly breeds. Family Ardeidae. 5. BOTAURUS LENTIGINOSUS (Montag.) American Bittern; Thunder Pumper. Recorded by Prof, Atkinson as occurring at Chapel Hill. 6. ARDEA HERODIAS (Linn.) Great Blue Heron; Blue Crane. ‘‘ These birds used to fly over here years ago but I have not noticed one, Iam sure, for the past twenty years.” —Dr. Kemp P. Battle. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 37 7. ARDEA EGRETTA (Gmel.) American Egret. A _ speci- men was shot north of the village by the late Mr. Dedrick in 1894. Doubtless a rare summer straggler. 8. ARDEA VIRESCENS (Linn.) Green Heron. A common summer resident about the mill-ponds and along the creeks. A nest containing fresh eggs was found near the village by Mr. George McNider during the first week of May 1899. Family Rallidae. 9. PORZANA CAROLINA (Linn.) Sora. One in the univer- sity collection was taken in November 1887, at Chapel Hill. 10. FuLicA AMERICANA (Gmel.) American Coot; Blue Peter. The only record is by Prof. Atkinson. ‘‘One walked into Mr. McCauley’s store at Chapel Hill on the night of April 8, 1887, at 8 o’clock, and was captured. A heavy wind and storm was prevailing, and had continued all day.” Family Scolopacidae. 11. PHILOHELA MINOR (Gmel.) American Woodcock. A rather common resident, but owing to its very retiring habits is not often seen. Noticed one on the University campus November 10, 1898. 12. GALLINAGO DELICATA (Ord.) Wilson’s Snipe; English Snipe. Not uncommon in wi:ter and during migration. 13. Toranus soxuirarius (Wils.) Solitary Sandpiper. Listed by Prof. Atkinson. This bird probably appears at Chapel Hill only as a migrant or occasional winter visitor. 14. ACTITIS MACULARIA (Linn.) Spotted Sandpiper. Cat- alogued by Prof. Atkinson. Its habits are quite similar to those of the Solitary. Family Charidriidae. 15. AEGIALITIS VOCIFERA (Linn.) Killdeer. The killdeer is commonly met with during the fall and winter months. It is highly probable, however, that it is a regular resident, nesting in favorable localities in the surrounding country. Family Tctraonidae. 16. COLINUS VIRGINIANUS (Linn.) Bob-white; Quail; Par- tridge. An abundant resident at all times of the year. 38 JOURNAL OF THE Family Phasianidae. 17. MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO (Linn.) Wild Turkey. A resi- dent at Chapel Hill. Have seen seven specimens. Four of these were shot near town, and three I observed alive. In November, 1898, one flew across the campus from the southern side and pitched near the Episcopal church building. They haunt at all seasons the large tract of woodland just south of the University, and quite likely construct their nests in some of the sedge fields near by. Family Columbae. 18. ZENAIDURA MACROURA (Linn.) Mourning Dove. Of common occurrence at all seasons. Its frail nest containing two pure white eggs may often be found on the boughs of the apple-tree or the horizontal limbs of the pine. Family Cathartidae. 19. CATHARTES AURA (Linn.) Turkey Vulture; Turkey Buzzard. A very common bird at all seasons of the year, rearing its young usually in hollow logs or stumps in the deep woods. 20. CATHARISTA ,ATRATA (Bartr.) Black Vulture; South Carolina Buzzard. Watched a fiock of Black Vultures flying northward over the campus November 1, 1897. On November 10 others were seen. During the winter of 1898-99 these birds again appeared in the neighborhood. It is doubtful if they ever breed in this region. Family Falconidae. 21. Circus HUDSONIUS (Linn.) March Hawk. An adult male was shot one mile east of town and brought to me on April 5, 1899. This is the only record for Chapel Hill. 22. ACCIPITER VELOX (Wils.) Sharp-shinned Hawk. A rather rare winter visitor. The mounted specimen in the University collection was shot by Mr. George McNider on January 23, 1898. 23. ACCIPITER COOPERI (Bonap.) Cooper’s Hawk. A com- monresident. A nest of fresh eggs was taken by Mr. George ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 39 McNider on April 29, 1898. This is the hawk whose inroads on the poultry yard are most destructive. 24. BuTEO LINEATUR (Gmel.) Red-shouldered Hawk. While it seems reasonable to think this would be a common bird here only one pair have come to my notice. During the spring of 1898 a pair were often watched as they circled through the air above the grove south of the University campus. On May 9, 1899, I took from their nest in a pine tree, thirty feet from the ground, a clutch of two handsomely marked eggs. Incubation was well advanced at this date. 25. Burro LATissimus (Wils.) Broad-winged Hawk: The only one of this species known to have been taken at Chapel Hill is the one brought to me for identification by Mr. George McNider on April 15, 1899, which specimen is still retained in his private collection. It was a female and was shot a few miles south of here. Its stomach contained the remains of a frog and a quantity of bird feathers. 26. HALIAEERUS LEUCOCEPHALUS(Linn.) Bald Eagle; Amer- ican Kagle. On March 27, 1898, I watched an adult bald ea- gle circling about in the air near the northwestern entrance of Battle’s Park. As the bird was not over one hundred yards above the earth at the time, its white head, neck and tail could be easily seen. It must be regarded as a very rare bird in this section, 27. FALCO SPARVERIUS (Linn.) American Sparrow Hawk; A moderately common resident hawk. Three fresh eggs were found in a nest located in the cavity of a dead pine tree in May, 1898, by Mr. K. H. Hartley. For the past two years a pair of these birds have spent the winter months on the University campus. Their favorite roost was under the eaves of the New Kast Building. Family Beronidae. 28. SYRNIUM NEBULOSUM (Forst.) Barred Owl; Hoot Owl, Have frequently heard them calling in Battle’s Park, and Jan- uary 18, 1899, a male, which had been wounded, was brought into the Biological Laboratory. 29. Macascors asio (Linn.) Little Screech Owl. The 40 . JOURNAL OF THE shivering notes of this little owl may be heard about the groves and campus during all seasons of the year. Especially is this true in the late summer when the young of the year, then about grown, join with their parents in the nightly ser- enade, Their nests are placed in the hollows of trees. 30. Buto Vircinianus (Gmel.) Great Horned Owl. For a large bird the horned owl is a fairly common resident in this region. Its domicile is usually located in the natural cavity of some tree or in an old hawk or crow’s nest. The eggs are deposited early in the year. A female shot on January 21, 1899, contained two well developed ovarian eggs. Family Cuculidae. 31. Coccyzus AMERICANUS (Linn.) Yellow-billed Cuckoo ; Rain Crow. A well known plaintive cry from orchard and forest is the note of the rain crow in summer. It retires to the south on the approach of autumn. Family Alcedinidae. 32, CERYLE ALCyON (Linn.) Belted Kigfisher, Observed occurring along the creeks in autumn, winter and spring. May possibly breed. Family Picidae. 33. DRYOBATES VILLOSUS AUDUBONII (Var?) Hairy Wood- pecker. ‘Two specimens were taken during the winter of 18- 97-98. It is probably a rare resident. 34, DRYOBATES PUBESCENS (Linn,) Downy Woodpecker, An abundant resident, associating often with the Titmouse and Chicadee. The downy spends the long winter nights in holes which it hollows out of the dead limbs of trees for this purpose. 35. SPHYRAPICUS VARIUS (Linn.) Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. A common winter form. It often girdles trees with numer- ous small holes which it drills for the purpose of drinking the sap. ‘The apple, spruce pine and maple are among the trees which thus suffer. 36. CEOPHLOEUS PILEATUS (Linn.) Pileated Woodpecker. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 41 This large handsome woodpecker is not an uncommon bird in Battle’s Park and adjoining woods. On November 8, 1897, I watched one for many minutes pecking about on the trees in the college campus. Without doubt the bird breeds in the large timber near by. 37, MELANERPES ERYTHROCEPHALUS (Linn.) Red-headed Woodpecker. A resident. Locally and occasionally com- mon. 38. MELANERPES CAROLINUS (Linn.) Red-bellied Wood- pecker, This large spotted ‘‘ sapsucker” is a not abundant resident with us at all seasons. 39. COLAPTES AURATUS (Linn,) Flicker; Yellow Hammer. ‘An abundant resident. ‘This woodpecker has acquired the habit of procuring its food so largely by digging it out of the earth that it may now be regarded as more of a ground bird than a dweller in trees. Family Caprimulgidae. 40. ANTROSTOMUS CAROLINENSIS (Gmel.) Chuck-will’s- widow. On the night of May 20, 1899, I listened to one of these birds calling for over half an hour. It seems to be in the neighborhood of the campus wall near the south-east cor- ner. So far as I am aware this is the only record of its occur- rence in Chapel Hill. It may possibly be found to be a rare summer resident in Orange county. 41. ANTROSTOMUS VOCIFERUS (Wils.) Whip-poor-will. A common summer visitor, depositing its two marble looking eggs on the ground in the woods, with only a few dead leaves ‘ between them and the earth. The first one noted in the spring of 1899 announced its arrival from the south by its loud cryon the night of April 20. 42. CHORDEILES VIRGINIANUS (Gmel.) Nighthawk; Bull- bat. A common spring and autumn transient. A few may linger through the summer to breed. First one seen in 1899 was in the afternoon of April 27. Family Micropodidae. 43, CHAETURA PELAGICA (Linn.) Chimney Swift; Chimney 4 - 492 JOURNAL OF THE Swallow. A common summer resident, arriving from the south early in April, First one noted for 1899 was on April 12. Before the white man came with his chimneys the swift built its nest in hollow trees. Family Trochilidae. 44. TRocHILus coLuBRIS (Linn.) Ruby-throated Hum- mingbird. Of the four hundred species of hummingbird known to occur in America, the ruby-throat is the only one found east of the Mississippi. Itis a common summer resi- dent at Chapel Hill, arriving during the latter half of April. Family Tyrannidae. 45. TYRANNUS TYRANNUS (Linn.) Kingbird; Bee Martin.’ This little -pugilist, which does not hesitate to attack any in- truder which comes near its nest, is a common summer resi- dent about Chapel Hill. 46. Myiarcuus cCRINITUS (Linn.) Crested. Flycatcher. An abundant summer resident, building its nest in cavities of trees or stumps seldom more than twenty feet from the ground, The bird has the habit of using among its other nesting ma- terials a cast snake skin. First arrival for 1899 noted April 21. 47, SAYORNIS PHOEBE (Lath.) Phoebe; Pewee. Summer resident. First noted in 1899 on April 30. Eggs have been taken by Mr. McNider. 48. CONTOPUS VIRENS (Linn.) Wood Pewee. Common summer visitor. 49, KMPIDONAX VERESCENS (Vieill,) Acadian Flycatcher. Listed for Chapel Hill by Prof. Atkinson. Probably a com-_ mon summer bird. Family Aladidae. 50. OrocorIS ALPESTRIS (Linn,) Horned Lark; Shore Lark. Two specimens were brought me on November 23, 1898. They were said to have been shot from a flock of about twenty in- dividuals. ‘This bird can be expected only as an irregular winter visitor. * 5 ee ee ‘BLISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY AR Family Corvidae. 51. CYANOCITTA CRISTATA (Linn.) Blue Jay. An abundant resident, nesting in large numbers in the trees about the cam- pus and village. Asset of five eggs taken from a nest on May 11, 1899, were slightly incubated. 52. Corvus AmerRICANUS (Aud.) American Crow. Com- mon bird. Breeds in numbers. 53. DoLICHONYX ORYzIoRUS (Linn,) Bobolink; Reedbird; Ricebird. Occurs as a fall and spring migrant, but not acom- mon species at any time. I noticed a flock of six individuals consisting of two males and four females on the campus May 20, 1899. 54. AGELAIUS PHOENICEUS (Linn.) Red-winged Blackbird, A resident, but nevera very abundant bird. It builds its nest in the bushes and trees along creeks. 55. STURNELLA MAGNA. Meadowlark; Old Field Lark. Of common occurrence in autumn and winter. During the winter months of 1898-99 a flock of about forty individuals remained constantly on the college campus. The birds may possibly breed in limited numbers in this region. 56. IcTERUS sPpURIUS (Linn.) Orchard Oriole. Not an un- common spring visitor, and very probably remains through the summer to nest. 57. SCOLECOPHAGUS CAROLINUS (Mull.) Rusty Blackbird. Two were shot by Mr. Ivy Lewis on Februrary 3, 1899, from a small flock, which was feeding along the branch in the grove just south of the campus. Later in the month several others were seen. 58. QUISCULUS QUISCULA (Linn.) Purple Grakle. Mr. Mc- Nider noted a small flock of these on Easter Monday, 1898. On December 28, 1898, I saw one on the college campus. They probably do not spend the summer in Orange county, Family Fringillidae. : 59. CARPODACUS PURPUREUS(Gmel.) Purple Finch. An abun- dant winter resident. They appear to have agreat relish for the buds of the wahoo or winged elm ((//mus alata) and may often be seen in large numbers feeding on these trees. 44 JOURNAL OF THE 60. PasseR pomEsTicus (Linn.) House Sparrow; English Sparrow. An abundant resident. They multiply rapidly, each pair of birds raising several broods in a season. 61. Sprnus TRisTis (Linn.) American Goldfinch; Yellow- bird ; Lettuce bird. A familiar bird throughout the year. 62. POOCAETES GRAMINEUS (Gmel.) Vesper Sparrow ; Bay- winged Bunting. Winter visitor, rather rare. 63. AMMODMRAMUS SANDWICHENSIS SAVANNA (Wils.) Savan- na Sparrow. Common winter visitor. 64. AMMODRAMUS SAVANNARUM PASSERINUS (Wils.) Grass- hopper Sparrow. Seen in winter and spring. A few may breed. 65, ZONOTRICHIA ALBICOLLIS(Gmel.) White-throated Spar- row. An abundant winter sejourner, associating in flocks of- ten in comparty with the snowbird (/wuco). Earliest arrival noted in 1897 was on October 4. 66. SPIZELLA MONTICOLA (Gmel.) Tree Sparrow. Listed a ae Atkinson probably as a winter occurence. . SPIZELLA SOCIALIS (Wils.) Cnipping Sparrow. One of our ee abundant summer birds, building its nest in the trees and bushes about the campus. First spring arrival for 1899 was seen on April 11. 68. SPIZELLA PUSILLA (Wils.) Field Sparrow. Common summer resident. It nests in low bushes or on the ground. 69. JUNCO HYEMALIS (Linn.) Slate-colored Junco; Snow- bird. ‘This is one of our best known winter friends, and is met with in numbers from the time of its arrival late in the autumn until the warm April days. It then leaves for its summer home in the north. ‘There is a common saying about the country that this bird in the spring turns to a sparrow, and in the fall of the year again assumes the dark coat and hood of the snowbird. My first record of its arrival in the fall of 1897 is October 30. 70. PEUCAEK AESTIVALIS BACHMANII (Aud.) Bachman’s Sparrow. ‘‘One taken froma breeding pair by myself at Chapel Hill. The nest was found by Willie Gullick; eggs 4, size .63x.70, dull whitish; nest a bulky structure on the ELISHA MITCHELL, SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 45 ground made of coarse grasses.” —A/kinson’s Catalogue. Itis probably a regular summer resident. 71. MELOSPIzZA FASCIATA (Gmel.) Song Sparrow. A com- mon winter visitor. Its strong clear song is one of the char- acteristic notes of a winter’s evening in the fields about Chapel Hill. 72. MELOSPIZA GEORGIANA (Lath.) Swamp Sparrow. A common winter visitor. 73. PASSERELLA ILIACA (Merr.) Fox Sparrow. This handsome brown fellow, the largest of all our sparrows, is a common though not an abundant winter bird. It avoids the open fields and may be found along the borders of thickets and in shrubbery. The first one seen by myself in the fall of 1897 was on November 17. 74. PIPILO ERYTHROPHTHALMUS (Linn.) ‘Towhee; Che- wink; Swamp Robin. This is a common bird during the migrations, haunting the thickets and the border of wooded streams. 75. CARDINALIS CARDINALIS (Linn.) Cardinal; Redbird. These beautiful and interesting birds are constant residents in this region. Their nests, composed mainly of twigs and leaves and lined with rootlets are generally situated in small trees. ‘Three or four is the number of eggs deposited. May is the usual month for breeding. | 76. HABIA LUDOVICIANA (Linn.) Rose-breasted Grosbeak. A rare spring transient. 77. GUIRACA CAERULEA (Linn.) Blue Grosbeak. Recorded by Prof. Atkinson. Found to occur only in the summer. 78. PASSERINA CYANEA (Linn.) Indigo Bunting; Indigo- bird. An abundant summer resident, building its nest in small trees and bushes a few feet from the ground, Family Tanagridae. 79. PIRANGA ERYTHROMELAS (Vieill.) Scarlet Tanager. Rather a rare spring transient. Have seen themin April and May. 80. PIRANGA RUBRA (Linn.) Summer Tanager; Summer ie 4* 46 JOURNAL OF THE Red-bird. An abundant and conspicuous denizen of the groves and orchards insummer. It constructs a nest of leaves, small strips of bark, and grass, situated usually on a hori- zontal limb from ten to twenty feet from the ground. *. Family Hirundinidae. 81. PROGNE suBIs (Linn.) Purple Martin. Have seen only a few. These came as spring migrants. They would likely spend the summer and breed, if suitable nesting places, such as bird boxes on poles, were furnished them. I know of none that nest here, nearer than eight miles from town. Dr. Kemp P. Battle informs me that forty years ago these birds were common summer residents. 82. CHELIDON ERYTHROGASTER (Bodd.) Barn Swallow. Common transient. 83. TACHYCINETA BICOLOR (Vieill.) - Tree Swallow; White- bellied Swallow. A common spring migrant. 84. STELGIDOPTERYX SERRIPENNIS (Oud.) Rough-winged Swallow. A summer visitor. Eggs secured by Mr. McNider from a hole in a clay bank in June 1899, I believe to be of this species, Family Ampelidae. . 85, AMPELIS CEDRORUM (Vieill.) Cedax Waxwing : Cedar- bird. The sad lisping notes of the cedar-bird is one of the most common sounds in the winter forest. The birds at this season usually associate in flocks of a few dozen individuals, and are often found clinging to the boughs of cedar trees, the berries of which they are very fond of eating. It probably nests here. Family Laniidae. 86. LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS (Linn.) Loggerhead Shrike. Rather a rare winter visitor. I have observed six individuals at Chapel Hill. Family Vireonidae. 87. VIREO OLIVACEUS (Linn.) Red-eyed Vireo; ‘‘Hanging bird.” A common summer form. ELISHA MITCHELL, SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 47 88. VIREO FLAVIFRONS (Nieill.) Yellow-throated Vireo. One taken by myself May 20, 1899. Will doubtless be found to be of regular summer occurrence. 89. VIREO SOLITARIUS (Wils.) Blue-headed Vireo. I se- cured a specimen on October 8, 1897, and within a week three other birds were seen. It may be looked for with success only during the spring and autumn migrations. 90. VIREO NOVEBORACENSIS (Gmel.) White-eyed Vireo. Prof. Atkinson records it as a ‘‘rare summer visitor.” Family Mniotiltidae. 91. Mwnroriira vaAsia (Linn.) Black-and-White Creeping- Warbler. Common summer resident, nesting on the ground in the woods. Have found it more numerous during the fall migration, This attractive little white and black striped acrobat is apparently equally at home while searching for food along the under side of a limb, or clinging head down- ward on the huge bole of some forest tree. 92. HELMITHERUS VERMIVORUS (Gmel,) Worm-eating Warbler. Listed by Prof. Atkinson. 93. COMPSOTHLYPIS AMERICANA (Linn.) Parula Warbler. An abundant species in the spring and autumn, [s doubtless a summer resident also. 94. DENDROICA AESTIVA (Gmel.) Yellow Warbler. Sum- mer resident. 95. DENDROICA CAERULESCEUS (Gmel.) Black-throated Blue Warbler. Common migfants. I have usually found them haunting thickets bordering woodland streams. 96. DENDROICA CORONATA (Linn.) Myrtle Warbler; Yeli- low-rumped Warbler. Plentiful in fall and spring, some re- maining through the winter months. 97. DENDROICA MACULOSA (Gmel.) Magnolia Warbler. I have found this a rare bird at Chapel Hill. Have taken only’ two specimens, one a male on September 24, 1897, the other a female five days later. 98. DENDROICA PENNSYLVANICA (Linn.) Chestnut-sided Warbler. Found only in transit. Have seen but one bird, it being a male taken on September 21, 1897. 48 JOURNAL OF THE 99. DENDROICA CASTANEA (Wils.) Bay-breasted Warbler. On October 2, 1897, about six o’clock in the morning I shot a female D. castanea and on October 8, another, a male. They are extremely rare birds, these being not only the first taken at Chapel Hill but are the first recorded in North Carolina. The skins of both specimens are preserved in the university collection. 100. DENDROICA STRIATA (Forst.) Black-poll Warbler. Rather rare transient. ‘Took a female on October 9, 1897. 101. DENDROICA BLACKBURNIAE (Gmel.) Blackburnian War- bler. Have found this only as a rare bird of of passage, Secured a female on October 16, 1897. 102. D&NDROICA DOMINICA (Linn.) Yellow-throated War- bler. Spring migrant. Have observed but few. | 103. DENROICA VIRENS (Gmel.) Black-throated Gree Warbler. I found this not an uncommon fall migrant. ‘Took a female October 2, 1897. 104. DENDROICA viGorsII:Aud.) Vine Warbler. A com- mon resident. Have not found the nest. The bird is said to build on horizontal limbs of pine trees from twenty to sixty feet from the earth. 105. DENDROICA PALMARUM (Gmel.) Palm Warbler, (more probably the var. D. p. hypochrysea, (Ridgw.).) Listed by Prof. Atkinson. 5 106. DENDROICA DISCOLOR (Vieill.) Prairie Warbler. Sum- mer resident, not uncommon. 107. SEIURUS AUROCAPILLUS (Linn.) Oven-bird ; Golden- crowned Thrush. A migrant, First one seen in spring of 1899 was on April 14. 108. SErURUS NOVEBORA CENSIS (Gmel.) Water-thrush. Not avery common transient. Have only seen a few speci- mens. 109. SEIURUSMOTA CELLA (Vieill.) Louisiana Water- thrush. Common summer resident. Observed as late in the fall of 1897 as September 21. First one seen in 1899 was on April 12. 110. GEOTHLYPIS TRICHAS (Linn.) Maryland Yellow-throat. A summer bird doubtless breeding here. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 49 111. IcrerIA visens (Linn.) Yellow-breasted Chat. An abundant summer resident. Found usually along the border of woods or haunting the growths of bushes in open fields along streams. 112. Hoopep WARBLER, Catalogued by Prof. Atkinson, Is probably a rare summer resident. 113, SETOPHAGA RUTICULLA (Linn.) American Redstart. A common migrant and a rather rare sojourner in summer. Family Motacillidae. 114. ANTHUS PENNSILVANICUS (Lath.) American Pipit; Tit- lark. About nine o’clock on the morning of January 4, 1899 I saw a flock of fully one hundred titlarks in the open piece of ground at the eastern side of the university campus. Have on two other occasions observed flocks of these birds at a dis- tance, but always during the coldest parts of the winter. Family Troglodytidae. 115. Mimus poLyGLorros (Linn.) Mockingbird. Several pairs of these birds are constant residents at Chapel Hill. There is a great difference in the musical power of different birds of this species. An especially fine singer, has for the past two years or more dwelt among th= shade trees of the lawns in the neighborhood of the Episcopa! church. 116. GALEOSCOPTES CAROLINENSIS (Linn.) Catbird. An abundant species in summer. The first ones arrive from the south near the middle of April. 117, HArPORHYNCHUS RUFUs (Linn.) Brown ‘Thrasher; Brown Thrush. These fine songsters come regularly to spend the summer in the thickets and groves about the village. Rarely also they spend the winter here. On January 2, 1899, I observed one on the lawn surrounding the home of Prof. Harrington. Itwas in company with a number of snowbirds and sparrows, and had apparently taken up its winter abode among them. 118. THvoTHoRUS LUDOVICIANUS (Lath.) Thisis one of the few species of birds which sing for us in the winter. It 50 JOURNAL OF THE remains here through the summer, breeding abundantly, The nest is made of a greatquantity of dried grass, strings, leaves and other materials, and is placed in a wide variety of posi- tions ; such as in old tin cans hung up in trees, in knot holes, or under the eaves of houses, and under brush heaps in the woods. On May 17, 1899, I was shown a nest containing six eggs, which was built in a man’s cap hung against the slat- ted side of an out-house. 119. TROGLODYTES AEDON (Vieill.) House Wren. Listed by Prof. Atkinson. Probably a rare transient. 120. TROGLODYTES HIEMALIS (Vieill.) Winter Wren. Com mon in winter. 121. CERTHIA FAMILIARIS AMERICANA (Bonop.) Brown Creeper. Common in winter, but not abundant. Family Paridae. 122. Srrra CaroLinensis (Lath.) White-breasted Nut- hatch. Common resident. Nests in holes in tall trees, early in April. 123. SITTA PUSILLA (Lath.) Brown-headed Nuthatch. Have frequently found them in the pine groves in April and May. 124. PARuS BICOLOR (Linn.) Tufted Titmouse. Common resident. Eggs number from four to six, and are depos- ited in the cavities of trees. 125. PARUS CAROLINENSIS (Aud.) Carolina Chicadee, A common and noisy resident ; often associating in small flocks in company with the titmouse. ‘The nest is made in holes in small trees or posts, from five to light eggs being deposi- fed. Family Sylvavudae. 126. REGULUS SATRAPA (Litcht.) Golden-crowned Knight A winter resident. It is worth a search in the winter forest to get a glimpe of this most exquisite gem of diminutive bird life, with his olive-green coat and bright orange and yellow crest. His summer home is among the evergreens of the mountains, and of the far north. ELISHA MITCHELL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY 51 127. REGULUS CALENDULA (Linn.) Ruby-crowned Knight. Have found it to be a less abundant species than the forego- ing. More common during the migration period. 128. PoLIoprTiLA CAERULEA (Linn.) Blue-gray Gnatcatcher. Very abundant summer resident, breeding in April and May. Eges four to six. Family Turdidae. 129. 'TuRDUS MUSTELINUS(Gmel.) Wood-Thrush; Wood Rob- in. This is the most abundant and characteristic summer bird of Chapel Hill, building the nest for its four greenish- blue eggs in the shade trees of the lawns and streets. The first arrival noted from the south in the spring of 1899 was one heard singing on April 22. | 130. ‘TURDUS FUSCESCENS (Steph.) Wilson’s Thrush. No- ted by Prof. Atkinson, Probably seen in transit. 131. TuRDUS USTULALUS SWANISONII (Cal.) Olive-backed Thrush, Occurs only as a migrant. One specimen taken Sep- tember 26, another October 9, 1897. 132. —TuRDUS AONALASCHKAE PALLASII (Cab.) Hermit Thrush. The common winter thrush. 133. MERULA MIGRATORIA (Linn.) American Robin. A well known resident. Breed, building their nests in shade and orchard trees. 134. SIALIA SIALIS (Linn.) Bluebird. Since the severe cold weather early in the year 1893, which proved so destructive to bird life in the Kastern States, the bluebird has been scarce. Of late, however, the species is beginning to assume more nearly its former numbers. Oct. 1, 7899. Guilford College, N.C, Asn Mis ‘ em Ty ath aa i ne Pek aititt Nia cea : Prak a : met ny JOURNAL OF THE Elisha Mitchell Scienitic Society VOLUME XVI ———— PART SECOND July-Decermber 1899 ISSUED FROM THE UNIVERSITY PRESS CHAPEL. BILL, N.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS. ON THE UNIVERSAL DISTRIBUTION OF TITANIUM. ; Charles DPasrerville . ::..-......2....,000 ee 52 THE OCCURENCE OF VANADIUM, CHROMIUM AND TITANIUM IN PREATS. Charles Baskerville: ...........0e0s..8e eee 54 A Stupy OF CERTAIN DOUBLE CHROMATES. W. G. Haywood..........01..: 3 56 ORIGIN OF PALEOTROCHIS. J¢ S. Diller views tases ook oe oi « Oe ce 59 THE DEEP WELL AT WILMINGTON N. C. ; Ji A. FAOMMER! oes. ww. vie se oe 5 bee ee 67 New East AMERICAN SPECIES OF CRATAEGUS. W. W. ASS assess tek. sc... sees ee 70 NOTE ON A QUALITATIVE TEST FOR TIN. Charles BASKERVILLE....\....... 5564.4 5 80. NoTE ON A CASE OF SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION. Charles Baskerville. ..:.......