SiiyJcKi; :r,ftn i-'UH %•.-., ., ;; - FOR THE PEOPLE FOR EDVCATION FOR SCIENCE LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Bound at lA.MN.HJ THE JOURNAL OF THE ' IINIIIN, EDITED BY ALWIN HAAGNER, F.Z.S., and B. C. R. LANGFORD. VOLUME X. PUBLISHED BY THE UNION IN PRETORIA, TRANSVAAL. LONDON AGENTS : WITHERBY & CO., 326 HIGH HOLBORN, W.C. 1915. n-i'^'A-^'?.-3'oJLu 2 PREFACE. ali^c^ The Editors regret the belated appearance of this number of the Journal, as well as tlie fact that only one number has appeared for 1914. The MSS. of this number was sent off to London in June, but for some unaccountable reason not quite clear to us, the proofs were only received in December, which made the issue of a second number impossible. The war and the unrest in our own country has been the cause of reducing our subject-matter, as many of our Members are with the Government troops. To all the Members of the S. A. O. U. we tender our best wishes for a prosperous 1915 ; and we trust that our Union will prosper and grow. THE EDITOES. Pretoria, December 31st, 1914. SUBJECT-MATTER INDEX, INCLUDING NAMES OF CONTRIBUTORS Page ' Aquila/ Vol. xx. 1913, noticed 33 < Ardea,' Journal of the Netherlands Ornithologists' Society noticed . 33 Avifauna of the Matatiele Uist., E. Griqualand. Additions to list of 6 Birds collected and observed in Zinibiti Dist., Port. E. Africa .... 1 of the Sabi Dist., East Transvaal 8 Breeding in captivity of the Kurrichaine Button Quail 19 British Birds : New List (Notice from the ' Field ') '23 , noticed 33 Davies, C. G. Additions to the List of the Avifauna of the Matatiele Dist. of East Griqualand 6 East Africa and Uganda Natural History Society, Journal noticed . 33 ' Emu,' Journal of the Australasian Ornith. Union, noticed 32 riower, Capt. S. S. Report of Zoological Service of Egypt for 1912 32 Game- and Water-Birds of the Pretoria Bushveld 15 Haagner, A. K., on the Game- and Water-Birds of the Pretoria Bushveld lo ' Ibis ' : Quarterly Journal of Ornithology, noticed 31 Ingle, J. C, List aud notes of Birds of Sabi Dist., East Transvaal. . 6 Kurrichaine Button Quail. Breeding in captivitv of 19 Langford, B. C. R. Singular Plumage of young Female Lanner . . 5 Lanner, Singular Plumage of young Female G Matatiele District. Additions to List of Avifauna of 0 Mors, F. E. O. On the Breeding in captivity of the Kuvrichaiup Button Quail 19 VI SUBJECT-MATTER INDEX. Page Notes on some of the Game- and Water-Birds of the Pretoria Eushveld 15 Occasional Notes 22 Phmiage of young Female Lanner 5 Pretoria Bnshveld, Game- and Water-Birds of 15 Proceedings of the Union 34 Report of the Zoological Service of Egypt for 1912, noticed ' 32 Sabi District, Birds of the 8 Sheppard, P. A. Additional list of Birds of Zimbiti District .... 1 Short notices of the Ornithological publications 31 Singular Plumage of young Female Lanner 5 Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections noticed 34 Swallow, Wonderful flight of 22 Witherby, H. F. Wonderful flight of Swallow 22 Zimbiti District, Port. East Africa, Birds of 1 Zoo (Pretoria) New Director, Appointment of 30 THE JOURNAL OF THE SOOTH AFRICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. Vol. X. DECEMBER 1914. No. 1. I. — Additional List of] and J^otes on Birds collected and observed in Zimhiti District 22 miles from Beira, P. E. A, Bj P. A. Sheppard. 209. Hypochera funerea. (Black Widow Fincli.) Quite a number passed throu(;h here on Dec. 25 and 2(j^ 1908, migrating south (I saw none after those dates). Thej were in company with Q. er^throj'S. All six specimens pro- cured appeared to be moulting, as a number of white feathers are in all of them ; and some of the males are very handsome in their blue and white colouring underneath. They were feeding on grass-seeds. 210. EsTRiLDA SUBFLAYA. (Orange-breasted Waxbill.) Not particularly plentiful and appearing in small flocks. 211. Pyrenestes grantii. (Grant^s Weaver Finch.) Decidedly rare. I have procured about half a dozen specimens and seen a few others. This species appears to haunt the thick herbage along the small streams in and about this locality, where I have shot all my specimens. They are not particularly shy, and their brilliant crimson heads shou' lip very clearlv. They feed on various grasses. 1 2 Mr. P. A. Shoppard oh Birds 212. Telephonussenegalus. (Black-headed Busli Sliiike.) The commonest shrike in the district. I have often "watched them chasing one another about on the ground when three or four get togotlier. They are extremely lively birds and no matter what the weather is, their calling and whistling may be heard all day long. Sitting on a stump or lo\v bough of a bush a pair will call to one another for several minutes. Some of their notes are very powerful and clear, while others are decidedly mournful. They feed on grassiio];)pers and other insects about the plantation here and undoubtedly do a great deal of good. I have not seen them molesting other small birds. When flvino; the tail is usually expanded. 213. COSSYPHA NATALENSI8. (Natal Robin C'hat.) I have only seen and shot two specimens, both in the thick undergrowth of the forest. 21 Jt. CossYPHA HEUGLiKi. (Heuglin's Robin Chat.) Rare. Two specimens were procured in thickets near a swamp and another in a ])atcli of low-lying thick forest. Extremely shy and difficult to shoot. They have a ])eauti- ful sono-. 215. Bkadyornis ATEEi. ( Black Flycatcher.) 1 have only procured one female, the nesting of which is described elsewhere. 1 am uncertain whether they are plentiful about here or not, as they are very much like the two " Drongos^' in appearance and habits. 216. Cypselus caffek. (African Swift.) Two specimens shot. This bird is not plentiful, and as far as my observations go, not resident. On Dec. 31, 1909, a flight of 40 to GO flew over, remaining an hour or so about the ])lantation and then going south ; it was raining heavily and the wind was N.E. 217. CosMETORNiS VEXiLLARius. (Standard AVing Nightjar.) I saw a })air in open woods on Nov. 13, 1909. The male had the extraordinary long wing feathers and appeared to be from the Zimblfl District, P.E.A. 3 a very fine specimen. Both birds were extremely shy and impossible to get a shot at, although I stalked them for a long time. Both eventually tlew into thick forest and sat on the bouohs of laroe trees at least 30 ft. from the ground. Their position when seated was parallel with the bough. 218 CucuLUS soLiTARius. (Red-chested Cuckoo.) I have only seen one specimen and this was near a nest of " Eri/thropugia quadririrf/nta," which contained one egg of C. sodtariu.f. 1 could not procure the bird. 210, (-HIIYSOCOCCYX KLAAsi. (Brouze Cuckoo.) A male shot on the 23. 0. Oi). It is rai-e here. One other was seen. 220. Chrysococcyx cltreus. (Golden Cuckoo.) One young bird was shot, a male, on Id. 1. 06, near the sea- coast. 221. Scops capensis. (Cape Scops Owl.) A female was shot on 24. G. 07 in a mangrove swamp. 222. Baza verreauxi. (Cuckoo Falcon.) A male was shot at the nest on 11. 11.09. I have seen a few others, but should say it is not l)y any means a plentiful species. 223. AsTURiNULA MONOGRAMMiCA. (African Buzzard Eagle.) By no means uncommon, frequenting woods, and it may often be seen on a dead tree or perched on a stump on toj) of an ant hill on the plantation, w^atching for rats and insects. I have often observed them pick up locusts and large grass- hoppers. Usually seen singly but sometimes in pairs. The call is very harsh and loud. Their flight is short, straight, with very quick beats of the wings. 224. Elanus c.eruleus. (Black-shouldered Kite.) One male shot on 15. 12. OG in thick woods. 225. AcciPiTER MiNULLUS, (Little Sparrow-Hawk.) One male shot on 8.9.07 in thick woods. 1* i Jiird^s front the Zinihiti l)'uhtnct. 7 (2) A spechnen of a Harrier-Eagle. Shot on tlie same farm on the 5. 10. 13. I am in doubt whether to refer this specimen to Circaetus pectoralis or C. cinereus, but rather incline to refer it to the hitter, for the following reasons, viz.: — It has all the appearance of C cinereus, and although I have no instrument for taking accurate measurements, the bill appears to be larger and stronger looking than in C, pectoralis ; also, although it is a joung bird^ the new feathers appearing seem to be a uniform dark brown as in C. cinereus. As the young of C. cinereus appears to b3 imdescribed, perhaps a short description of this specimen M'ould be of interest. Description. — Head creamy white on thecrown; the feathers liave narrow brown shaft-stripes, and towards the nape the feathers become brown subterminally, the amount of broAvn increasing as the mantle is apjn-oached ; round the back of the ear-coverts the feathers are shaded with dark brown^and down the centre of the throat the feathers have dark shaft- streaks. The mantle, scapulars, all the wing-coverts dark brown edged with fulvous, rather more rufous on the lesser wing-coverts. Secondaries ashy brown indistinctly barred with darker brown and ti|iped with white ; the primaries the same colour, but the larger ones almost black lor the terminal third and the inner ones broadly tipjied with white. Tail-coverts like the rest of the upper surface but rather paler ; tail dark ashy brown, wath faint indications of four or five darker bands; all the feathers tipped with rufous white. Under surface white ; all the feathers wdth terminal or sub- terminal bands of pale rufous, the breast being almost uniform pale rufous, as the white bases of the feathers do not show. Under wing-coverts white with subterminal bars of rufous; tibial plumes the same Init brighter than rest of under surface. Bill bluish grey, black at tip. Cere and ga})e bluLsh* Irides yellow tinged with orange-chestnut round the pupil. Legs and feet dirty wdiite. Length 27", wing 20^. Sex ? I have also lately shot an albinistic specimen of the Cape Quail, ? . Head mostly white with a few white feathers scattered about throughout the rest of the plumage. 8 Capt. J. C. Tnglc on Birds fvom IV. — Birds collected and observed in tlie Sahi District of the Transvaal. Bj Captuiii J. C. Ingle, F.Z.S. The Sabi District is comprised of the country through "which the Sabi Biver runs. The river rises in the Drakens- berg Mountains, on the eastern slopes, about three hours' ride from the town of Lydenburg. The first 20 miles or so of its course is through rough hilly country much cut up by deep kloofs, some of which are densely wooded. Lower down in the foot-hills the country is still much broken, but the hills and kloofs get smaller, until ultimately the river flows out into and through the " bush-veld " proper and the Sabi Game lieservej then through the Lebombo Mountains and into the Portuguese Territory. Bird-life is often plentiful and varied, but my laclc of knowledge of the local avifauna, as well as the want of literature on the subject^ accounts for the smallness of this list. Those species marked with an asterisk were collected by me and sent to Mr. Haagner. Anas sparsa. (Black Duck.) — Common. Plectropterus gambensis. (S{)ur-wing Goose.) — Only seen here during the wet season. *CuRSORius temmincki. (Lesser Courser.) — Barely seen in this district. A small flock of ten, seen on the 4th March, 1910, were the only ones I have met with during many years of travelling and i-esiding in tlie Sabi. These were feeding upon insects in a cattle kraal, and I obtained two specimens, the stomachs of which contained insects. Iris dark brown. *Stephanibyx coronatus. (Crowned Lapwing.) — This bird is only seen here sparingly during the winter months after the grass has been burnt, and then usually only in pairs. Iris yellowish brown. Legs coral-red. This species is also found throughout the Eastern Bushveld. I saw 'H /locks (for the first time) in January 1912 on the farm Roodewal. the Sail District, Transvaal. 9 CEoiCNEMUS CAPENsis. (Cape Thickknee.) — Rare. *Tringoides HYroLEUCOS. (Common Sandpiper.) — Rare. I have only seen two of these birds during a period of four years, one of which I shot in a cattle kraal. It was moultiiio-, and had a flight like a Sandpiper. Its stomach contained insects. Iris nearly black. Legs olivaceus green tinged with brown. Otis kori, (Giant Bastard.) — Uncommon. This is purely a *' Bush\eld " bird. They sometimes get excessively fat. One I shot many years ago just pulled the spring- balance below the 40 lbs. notch. Otis afroides. (White-quilled Bustard.) — Not un- common. Otis melanogaster. (Black-bellied Bustard.) — Not common. Anthropoides paradisea. (Blue Crane). — Rare. Only two seen. Pterocles bicinctus. (Double-banded Sandgrouse.) — I found eggs of this species in the Bushveld in the month of July ; also fully fledged young birds. Theristicus hagedash. (Green Ibis.) — Fairly common. CiCONiA CICONIA. (White Stork.) — An occasional visitor. Scopus umbretta. (Hammerhead.) — Occasionally seen along the banks of the Sabi River. *BuTORiDES atricapillus. (Green-backed Heron.) — Rare. Two individuals flew out of a hole in the river- bank (Umtincho River) on the 12th November, 1911, one of which 1 shot. The stomach contained a frog and the remains of water-beetles. Iris yellow. Legs lemon-yellow. Some- times when disturbed it utters a single harsh croaking note. Herodias brachyrhy>;cha. (Yellow-billed Egret.) — Rare. 10 Capt. J. ('. Ingle on Birds from ViNAGO DELALANDEi. (Cape Fruit Pigeon.) — Connnon in the forests of the lower altitudes. CoLUMBA PH.EOKOTA. (Rock Pigeon or Speckled Pigeon.) — Common in the ripening cornfields of the higher altitudes. TuRTUR SEMiTORQUATUS. (Red-eycd Turtle-Dove.) — Rare. Only one seen and shot. TuRTUR CAPICOLA. (Cape Turtle-Dove.) — Common. Tympanistria tympanistria. (Tamljourine Dove.) — Scarce. Only found in the bush. Chalcopelia afra. (Metallic-spotted Dove.) — Connnon. NuMiDA CORONATA. (Crovvned Guinea Fowl.) — Common in parts; does a lot of damage to the grain-crops. Pternistrs swainsoni. (Northern Red-necked Pheasant.) — Common in the scrub of the valleys amongst the foot-hills. Francolinus afer. (Grey-winged Francolin.) — Common; found on the lower ridges of the hills. Francolinus lev^aillanti. (Cape Redwing Francolin.) — Common on the mountain tops. Francolinus coqut. (Coqui Francolin.) — Common on the lower foot-hills and in the bushveld. AcciPiTER MiNULLUS. (Little Sparrow-Hawk.) — Connnon. Spizaetus bellicosus. (Martial Hawk-Eagle.) — Rare. LoPHCETUS occipitalis. (Crested Hawk-Eagle.) — Rare. CercHlNEIS rupicola. (South African Kestrel.) — Common. Asio nisuklla. (Marsh Owl.) — Fairly common. Pisorhina capensis. (Cape Scops OwL) — Rare. Strix flammea maculata. (Cape Barn Owl.) — (Common. Strix capensis. (Grass Owl.) — Rare. It is sometimes flashed by dogs, in the long grass of the vleis. tlie Sahi ]Jist)'i<'t, 'rransvaal. 11 Chiz.erhis concolok. (Grey Lourie.) — Common in the bushveld. Gallirex porph\reolophus. (Pnrple-cresteJ Lourie.) — Common in the forests of the lower foot-hills. TuRACUs coRYTHAix. ((ytipe Lourie.) — Common in the forests on the higher mountain slopes. *Centropus GRiLLi c.ERrLEiCEPS. (Nutal Coucal.) — Fairly- common, but not easy to locate. Native name " Ifookwe.'^ It inhabits the scrub, and is very partial to vleis with plenty of dry cover alongside. Flight low^ and weak; they seem to fall into a bush instead of alighting. Contents of stomachs of two procured, grasshoppers, beetles, and caterpillars. Iris dark brown. Legs dark shite. Lower mnndil)le pide flesh- colour. Upper mandible tip pale flesh darkening to blackish at base. Indicator major. (Yellow-throated Honeyguide.)— Not connnon. Trichol^ma leucomelan. (Pied Barbet.) — Fairly common. *Geocolaptes olivaceus. (Ground Woodpecker.) — Un- common, but local. They always seem to hang about the banks of old watercourses or dongas. They have a harsh note, wdiich is easily distinguished when one has once learnt to know- it. One collected contained small red ants. L'is salmon pink. Legs pale greenish slaty blue. Dendropicos guineensis. (Cardinal Woodpecker.) — • Local. *CoLius striatus minor. (Lesser Speckled Coly.) — Common. CoLius iNDicus. (Red-faced Coly.) — Rare. Apaloderma naRINA. {Sarina trogon.) — A rare bird. Only seen on three occasions in the dense bushes of the mountain slopes. 12 C;ipt. J. C*. Ingle ov Birds from CoRACiAs CAUDATUS. (Lilac-breastcd Roller. J — Common in the ])ushveld. BucoRVUS CAFER. (Grountl Hornbill.) — Common in the busliveld, where its booning notes may often be heard. LoPHOCEROS ERYTHRORHYNCHUS. (Red-billed Hornbill.) — Common in the bush veld. Halcyon cyanoleucus. (Angola Kingfisher.) — Fairly common. CoRYTHORNis CYANOSTIGMA. (Malachite Crested King- fisher.)— Not uncommon. *Alcedo semitorquata. (FTalE-collared Kingfisher.) — Rare. Ceryle rudis. (Pied Kingfisher.) — (*ommon. Ceryle maxima. (Giant Kingfisher.) — Rare. Melittophagus meridionalis. (Little Bee-eater.) — A few seen. Merops apiaster. (European Bee-eater.) — Common. Breeds here. Merops nubicoides. (Carmine-breasted Bee-eater.) — Arrives in the Bushveld in November and leaves early in April. Upupa africana. (African Hoopoe.) — Sparingly seen. Caprimulgus pectoralis. (South African Nightjar.) — Common. *Caprimulgus trimaculatus. (Freckled Nightjar.) — Common. One collected. Stomach contained insects. Iris dark brown. Legs dark pinkish drab. Batis molitor. (White-flanked Flycatcher.) — A few seen. TcHiTREA perspicillata. (Paradise Fly-catcher.) — Not uncommon. the Said J )idrict, Transvaal. 13 *NiLAiTS BRUBRU. (Brubru Bush-Shrike.) — Rather rare and solitary. Contents of stomach, insects. PoMATORHYNCHUS AUSTRALis. (Three-streaked Bush- Shrike.) — Rare. Dryo3COPUS cubla. (TiBsser puff-back Shrike.) — Rare. Only two seen. *Lanius collaris humeralis. (Northern Fiskal Shrike.) — Fairly common. Three collected. Iris dark brown. Lpgs slaty bine-black. Contents of stomachs, beetles and other insects— also larvae. Urolestes MELANOLEUcrs. (Loiig-tailed Bush-Shrike.) — (Jommon in the Bush\eld. CoRVUS SCAPULATUS. (Pied Crow.) — Rare. CoRVULTUR ALBicoLLis. ( White-necked Raven.) — Rare. DiCRURUS AB'ER. TFork-tailed Drongo.) — Not uncommon. Oriolfs oriolus. (Golden Oriole.) — Rare, A few seen. Oriolus LARVATU8. (Black-headed Oriole.) — Not common. BuPHAGUS ERYTHRORHYNCHUS. (Red-billed Oxpecker.) — (jornmon. Lamprocolius phcenicopterus bispecularis. (Lesser Red-shouldered Glossy Starling.) — Rare. Amydrus morio. (Redwing Starling.) — Common in the mountainous parts. *PLOCErs ocuLARius. (Bottle-nest Weaver.) — Fairly common during the summer months. One collected. Iris straw-colour. Legs dark grey. Contents of stomach, insects. Ploceus yelatus. (Masked Weaver.) — Common. *Ploceus capensis olivaceus. (OliA-e Weaver.) — Not common. Several procured. Iris dark brown. Legs dirty slate-brown. Contents of stomach, insects and grass-seeds. Pyromelaxa orix. (Redbishop Bird.) — Common. 14 Birds from the Sahi JJisirict, Transvaal. *EuPLECTES XANTHOMELAs. (Black-tliiglied Bishop Bird ) — Common. Shot several in a vlei. One cock usually accom- panies a flock of dull-coloured hens. They nest in the reeds. The flight seems weak. Iris dark brown. Legs dark brown. Contents of stomach, grasshopper and a few small insects. *Urobrachya axillaris. (Red-shouldered Widow Bird.) — Rare here. Iris ))lack. Legs black. Bill pale horny grey. EsTKiLDA ASTRiLD. (Common AVaxbill.) — Common. Ur.eginthus ANGOLENsrs. (Blue-breasted Waxbill.) — Only seen in the bushveld. Vidua serena. (Pin-tailed Widow Bird.) — Common. *Serini:s canicollis. (Cape Canary.) — Common. In flocks. ? 29. G. 11. Lis dark hazel. (Jontents of stomach, seeds. Motacilla capensis. (Cape AVagtail.) — Common. *Anthus leucophrys. (Plain-backed Pipit.) — Common. *Macronyx capensis. (Cape Longcdaw.) Macronyx ckoceus. (Yellow-throated Longclaw.) — Common. *Pycnonotus barbatus layardi. (Blackcap Bulbul.) — Common. ZosTEROPS viRENS. (Green AVhite-Eye.) — Common. *Chalcomitra ollvacea. (Olive-coloured Sunbird.) Chalcomitra amethystina. (Black Sunbird.) — Common. Nectarinia famosa. (Malachite Sunbird.) — Common. *Cisticola CHiNiANA. (Smith's Warbler.) — One specimen in collection. *CisTiC0LA NATALENSIS. (Natal Grass-Warbler.) — Rare. One obtained. Iris straw-colour. Legs pale flesh. Contents of stomach, insects. JiirJs of the Pretoria JJiish \'elJ. 15 *OiSTicoLA TiNNiENS. (LevaiUant's Grass-Warbler.) — (lommon on grass or scrub land. Found singly or in pairs. ? 27. G. 11. Iris and legs light brown. Contents of stomach, small beetles. *Prinia hypoxantha. (Saffron-breasted Wren-Warbler.) — Common on grass lands. Iris light brown. Legs flesh- colonr. Stomach, insects. *Thamnolea bifasciata. (Buff-streaked Chat.) — Not uncommon. *Pratincola touquattis. (South African Stone Chat) (var. orieiitdlis). — Common. *Cossypha caffra. (Capo Robin Chat.) — Eatlier uncommon here, but commoner up on the mountain ranges, (contents of stomach, insects. Y. — Notes on some of the Game- and Water-Birds of the Pretoria Bvsh Veld. By Alwin Haagner, F.Z.S., CoLM.B.O.U., Director, Tvl. Zool. Gardens. AViTH the opening of the present shooting season, I made up my mind to go on an eight days' shooting trip to the Bushveld. Our party (consisting of 4 " guns," a guide, and a couple of native servants) left Pretoria early one Tuesday morning in a light spring-trolley drawn by four ponies. We journeyed through the native reserves of " Hebron " and " Jericho," where, through the kind permission of Chief Mamogale (sub-chief of the Bakwena Tribe) — we had excellent sport. From Jericho we went to " Buffelsdraai," a wild thickly wooded farm on the Aapies River, 50 miles from Pretoria, for permission to ^hootupon which we have to thank Mr. Altman of Pretoria. Here a large male brown hyena was caught in a " gintrap"and several unsuccessful attempts were made to locate a leopard in the thickly wooded kloofs. " Haak- doornbult," a farm on the ( *rocodile River, is about ten 16 Mr. Alwiii ]Iaa<>;ner on miles from " BiiffelsJraai." Our l)ag consisted of 78 birds, besides hare and buck. The birds included Guinea-fowl, Korhaan, Pheasant, three species of Francolin, Sandgrouse, and Lapwing. Birds were plentiful, but the avifauna of the bushveld has already been so ably described by Mr. Austin Roberts in the pages of this Journal that I need not enlarge upon it further. I will confine myself solely to the Game- birds and Waterfowl, as some of my notes hereon are of particular interest. 1. CoLYMBUS CAPENSis. Cape Dabcliick. A young fully fledged example was procured at Haak- doornbult, and a few adults were seen (April). 2. Anas si'ARsa. Black Duck. A pair flew over our camp at Buffelsdraai on the Aapies River, uttering their cries, on the evening of the 20th June, and 1 subsequently saw a pair on one of the pools in the Aapies River. 8. Anas erythrorhyncha. Redbilled Teal. In April and May a number of young were found in the pools at Haakdoornbult, and brought to me. They were in various stages of growth from 3'oung day old ducklings to fully fledged birds. Some young ones a couple of weeks old were found in June. 4. Dendrocygna viduata. White-faced Duck. In early May a number of young birds were found and about a dozen captured. Like the i^edbilled Teal they were in all stages of growth. I had not known previously that this bird bred in the Pretoria or Rustenburg Bushveld. When about half grown the red of the chest and the dark vermiculations begin to show, but it is not until they are quite adult that these become at all plain enough for one to be sure of the species. I should say, judging by the birds now in my possession, that they will go another couple of months be- fore getting their full colour — probably till the Spring (October or November). Mr. Sclater (Vol. iv. Birds-Fauna of S. Africa) says nothing is known of its breeding in South Africa. Birds of the Pretoria Bitsh Veld. 17 5. Sarkidiornis melanotus. Knobbilled Duck. A number of these ducks were also breeJino- on the pools at Haakdoornbult and eight joung ones were captured, four of which were safely brought to the Zoo. Thej were, when fully fledged, of a drab-brown colour above, the whole breast and flanks being of a dirty white mottled with drabbish brown. The wings were of a darker shade. The birds have now (mid July) nearly attained their full size, and the wings, especially the upper coverts, are becoming darker and darker and the metallic blue and green sheen is also beo-inninor to apj)ear. They must now be somewhere between three and four months old. This is also a surprise to me — viz. to find these birds breeding in the Central Transvaal. I thought the most southerly breeding-grounds were Lake Ngami and the Zambesi River. 6. CuRSORius RUFUS. Rufous Courser. I saw two small flocks of these birds at Jericho and a pair at Buffelsdraai. They are nothing like so common in the Central Transvaal as they are on the Free State flats. 7. Stephanibyx coronatus. (Crowned Lapwing). This was a very common bird at Jericho, especially anion o- the scattered scrub round about the native town, and even on the open spaces of the town itself, I only saw a few between Jericho and Buffelsdraai. 8. HoPLOPTERUS sPECiosus. Blacksmith Plover. A few were to be found on the pools at Haakdoornbult, and Mr. Powell (our guide) captured a pair which are now in the Pretoria Zoo. Their characteristic metallic "chink chink" may now often be heard in the gardens. 9. GEdicnemus capensis. Cape Thickknee, I never saw a single example at Jericho strano-e to sav, and only a solitary individual at Buffelsdraai. 10. Otis ruficrista. Red Crested Korhaan. This pretty Bustard was not uncommon in the thick bush at Jericho, where its peculiar whistling ci-v was often heard. 18 Birds of the Pretoria Busli Veld. This species is protected in tlie Pretoria District. 1 did not see any further north, at Buffelsdraai. 11. Otis afeoides. White-quilled Bustard. I saw the first of these birds near the road about twelve miles from Pretoria. We shot se\cral along the road between Jericho and Buffelsdraai. These birds are not found in the thick bush, but inhabit the open veld or the open patches of grass-veld among the more scattered bush. A female with two young- ones, nearly full grown, was procured near Buffelsdraai on the 20th June, 1914. 12. LiMNOcoRAX NIGER. Black Crake. A few are found at Haakdoornbult. 13. Pterocles bicinctus. Double-banded Sandgrouse. I heard the somewhat plaintive whistle of this bird on a few occasions while at Jericho. At Buffelsdraai they were fairly common, and we had good sport by waiting at the pools in the Aapies Biver and shooting them on the wing as they arrived for their evening drink. As they fly fairly fast and sometimes arrive in small flocks or in threes and fours excellent sport can be had, which, however, only lasts about half an hour on account of the short twilieht. 14. Tantalus ibis. Wood Ibis. One example was brought to me from the Aapies River about 20 miles from Pretoria. This is now in the Pretoria Zoo, and I attach a snapshot photograph of this rare bird. 15. Scorus UMBRETTA. Hammer Head. I saw one example at Buffelsdraai. IG. NuMiDA CORONATA. Crowncd Guinea-fowl. Vei'y common in the thick bush at Jericho, going out into the old lands to feed at early morning and towards evening. The crops of several opened by me contained ants, grasshoppers, and small bulbs. 17. Pternistesswainsoni. Swainson'sPeJneckFrancolin. Common at Jericho, but not so plentiful at Buffelsdraai. They are found along the waterless Sand Eiver, in the Journ. S. Afr. Orn. Union, Vol. X. PI. II. [To /ace p. 18. Photo A. Haagner. WOOD IBIS. On tJte Breeding of the Kiirrichaine Button Quail. 19 scattered scrub bordering this water-conrso or along the old lands. 18. Feancolinus natalensis. Natal Francolin. Scarce at Jericho, but fairly common at Buffelsdraai in the dense bush along the Aapies liiver. 19. Francolinus SKPHiEXA. Crowned Francolin. We did not come across this pretty sj)ecies at Jericho, but shot several in the thick bush along the Aapies lliver at Buffelsdraai. 20. Francolinus coqui. Coqui Francolin or S\vemi)ie. Saw three or four covies in the thick bush at Jericho. 21. CoTURNix coTURNix AFRICANA. African Quail. We flushed a fair number at Jericho, in the old lands. VI. — On the Breeding of the Kurrichaine Button Quail (Turnix lepurana) in Captivitij. By F. E. 0. MoES. During the early part of Nov. 1912 a little native girl brought me four eggs, of a greenish-grey colour with reddish- brown spots, about half the size of a common pigeon's egg. I did not recognise the eggs and took them for those of some species of Lark. One of the eggs was cracked, so I gave it to a Crow to eat. When tlie G'row broke open the egg, I noticed that it had incubated for about five or six days. The other three eggs I decided to put into an incubator in which were fowls' eggs, due in eight days' time. I took a small cardboard box which I half filled with fine sand, on this I placed the three eggs and put the whole into the incubator on a piece of wood, in order to bring these small eggs to the same level as the fowds' eggs. I subsequently treated them in the same manner as the fowls^ eggs. On the day the fowl chicks emerged from the shells, I heard very faint " peeping '' in the incubators, but could only see through the glass door of the incubator that all three eggs were pecked in the usual manner, so I expected to see some young Larks come out of 2* 20 Mr. F. E. 0. Mors on the BreeJ'uig of the the eggs, but late at niglit I looked again and found the eggs in the same position and also heai'd the tiny poeping sound in the incubator. I then went to sleep with the thought that the little birds were too weak to peck their way ont of the shells and would surely die during the course of the night. Early next morning 1 decided to take the fowl chicks out of the incubator, and I opened the machine and took out first the box with the three little eggs and brought it to my ears to listen — no sound — surely all dead ! I went out to the garden with the eggs in the box to obtain better light to examine the pecking of the eggs. To my surpi'ise I noticed the sun shining through empty shells, of which the toj) parts were still nicely in position, being held there by a small piece of skin attached to the egg-shell which worked like hinges. Anxious to see what kind of birds were hatched out of tliese eggs, I went again to the incubator and took ont the fovvl chicks, and found between them three nice little chicks of scarcely an inch in height oE a brownish colour on the back ; this ground-colour was divided into three portions by two light brown s'ripes running from the eyes to the tail. I put some sand in a box and jtlaced therein my three little chicks, and covered the box with a j)iece of glass. The first food I made of a little piece of the yolk of a hard-boiled egg, a grain of boiled rice, and a drop of milk. After being well mixed, I took this food with a fine piint-brush and held it to the beak of the little chickens, and they soon learned to eat the food from the brush. I fed them twice an hour, and at night time I covered them with cotton wool and put them back into the incubator. On the third day the birds started pecking for food on the sand in the box, into which I now put as many little white ants and black ants as I could get, and they were eagerly sought for and devoured. The growth of the birds was now very fast. 1 therefore gave them more substantial food (boiled egg and rice mixed with powdered dried meat), fine cut green stuff, and ants, on which the chicks thrived well and were at Xmas time about seven weeks old^ when they started feathering. This was Karrichaine Button Quail in raptiviti/. 21 completed very quickly^ and soon I could recognise the birds as two males and a female; the latter was much larger and of a brighter colour, especially on the breast. 1 had planted in a big cage some clumps of grass and h'ttle bushes, as much as possible assimilating with the ordinary veld. Into this I put the birds. A few days later 1 saw the two males chasino" one another, while the female was standiiiii' with a stiff neck, puffed up breast, and uttering cries. The next day one male commenced buikiino' a nest between two grass bushes, and a few days later I saw the female bird taking part in this nest-building. The nest itself was only roughly made of dry grass like a fiat cu[) with a cover above it. On the 27th of February, when the birds were not four months old, the hen started laying and continued to lay every day an egg which the male birds covered every tiu^.e with dry grass. When five eggs were laid, the male bird started sitting on them. The female kept watching over the nest and went on the eggs as soon as the male came off for food. This coming off the nest was very strange, the bird slowly rising and slippi'jig off behind the nest and continually pulling small pieces of grass, which he threw behintl him to cover his way. If the male bird took a bit too lono- to feed the female came oft' the nest and chased him back to his duty. On the 15th of March, after 15 days^ incubation, three little chicks were hatched, but I arrived just in time to see the female killing two of them, so I decided to place the male bird with the remaining little one in a separate cage with a layer of sand on the bottom. The male bird was leading and, feeding the youngster as a common hen does her chickens. The female mated up with the other male immediately after I had removed the first one with the youngster, and on the 25th of March the second male was sitting upon seven eggs. In all I reared eleven youngsters from the first three birds in 1913, of which one pair is now in the Zoological Gardens at Pretoria. The whole breeding-habits of these birds are very interesting. I have not succeeded in deciding whether the female of these 22 Occasional JVotes. birds would under natural conditions live with two or more males. According to the fertility of the female I should think this was the case. This I hope to find out within the next year or two. VII. Occasional JSotes. 1. From Scotland to Orange Free State. Wonderful flight of a Swallow. Sir, — In sending you the attached from ' British Birds/ which I think cannot fail to prove of interest to your readers, I may mention that the readers of 'British Birds ^ Magazine have now placed over 32,000 rings on wild birds of many kinds, and that this is leading to results of great interest and importance in connection with the study of birds. Should ringed birds ever come into the hands of your readers I hope they will notify me at once, stating the name on the ring and the number, as well as the date and place where the bird was found. I will then at once inform them when and where the bird was ringed. Yours faithfully, H. F. WiTHERBY, {Editor, ' British Birds '). Swallow ringed in Ayrshire and recovered in Orange Free State. In August I received a letter from Mr. A. C. Tlieron dated from the "Riet Vallei, District Lindley, O.F.S.," stating that a Swallow liad been captured bearing a ring with my name and address. As Mr. Tlieron gave neither the number of the ring nor the date of capture I asked him for these particulars and have just received his reply and the ring itself. The ring is number E937, and Mr. Theron informs me that the bird was captured at Riet Vallei on March 16th, 1913, and adds, " I do not know when it arrived." This ring was placed on a nestling Swallow by Mr. R. O. Blyth at Skelmorlie, Ayrshire, on July 27th, 1912. A few months ago an adult Swallow ringed in Staffordshire was re- covered as Ji.aving been captured near Utrecht, Natal, in December, and the present record is from about one hundred and fifty miles west of that Occasional J\^otes. 23 place, which is not far iu comparison with the total length of the journey. In -writing of the Natal record I expressed surprise that a Swallow breeding in the far west of Europe should migrate so far east in South Africa, but now that Dr. Hartert has shown b}' his observations in the middle of the Sahara that deserts are not necessarily a bar to the passage of migrating birds, as was formerly supposed, it may perhaps bo pre- sumed that these Swallows take a more direct line than one would previously have thought possible. This second record, taken in conjunction with the first, is extremely valiuible, and we are most grateful both fo Mr. Blyth who ringed the Swallow and to Mr. Theron who reported it. II, F. WiTHKRBY. 2. A NEW List of Beitish Birds. The 'Field' has the following cogent remarks upon a nuich debated question : — One of the greatest hindrances to the progress of zoology at the present day is the reckless way in which changes of nomenclature are being made by those who profess to be rendering a service to science. Tlieir plea is that tliey are striving to bring about a uniformity in nomenclature, but by introclucino; new names, resuscitciting lono--torootten ones, o -^ COO ■ and transferring others from one species to another, they are really hindering the attainment of their object, and creating a great deal of confusion. It is not surprising, therefore, that many working naturalists should protest, ns they do, against having these new names thrust upon them to the exclusion of those which have l)een in use for more than a century. The majority of names in use are to be found in all the text books of British and continental naturalists, and have become imbedded in the literature of zoology. To attempt to disturb them now is futile, for while a few students of the present generation may think it incumbent upon them to follow the leaders of the new school under the banner of '"Progress,^' and to accept what they regard as the latest and most up-to-date list, the majority are quite content to leave things as they are, and to use the names auctorum j^luri- monon. They see no advantage in the changes proposed. 24 Occufiional Notetf. The protest on this score, which id gaining ground, \a nothing new. So far back as 1896 in a discussion which took phice at a meeting of the Zoological Society, Sir E. Eay Lankester, protesting against the " digging up " of old names, suggested that an international committee should be formed, not to draw up a code of rules, but to produce an authoritative list of names — once and for all — about which no lawyer-like haggling should hereafter be permitted. Again, at a meeting of the Zoological Society in 1908, a paper was read by Mr. Boulenger on the abuses resulting from the strict application of the rule of prioiity in zoological nomenclature, and on the means of protecting well-known names. In the coarse of his ren^arks he said : — The worst feature of this abuse is uot so much the bestowal of un- known names on well-known creatures, as the transfer of names from one species to another. The names that were used uniformly by Cuvier, Johannes Miiller, Owen, Agassiz, Darwin, Huxley, and many others would no longer convey any meaning. Very often they woidd be mis- understood; in fact, the very object for which Latin or Latinised names were introduced would be defeated. It is all very well to talk of uni- formity in the future, but surely we must have sume consideration for the past. Names with which all general zoologists, anatomists, and physiologists are familiar should be respected, and should be excepted from the rule by virtue of what may be termed the pi-ivilege of pre- scription. If biologists would agree to make that one exception to the law of priority in nomenclature, things would adjust themselves well enough, and we might hope to see realised some day what we all desire — fixity in names, that we may readily understand tlie meaning of all vn-iters, not only oyer the whole civilised world at the present day and in the future, but back into the last century, which has marked so great an advance in zoological science. Such a result would be attained by protecting time-honoured names of well-known animals from the attacks of the revisers of nomenclature. These remarks were generally approved, and the following memorandum was drawn up and circulated amongst British zoolooists. The signatures appended to it show that^ in this country at least^ strict adherence to tiie rule of priority is far from meeting with general support. The undersigned zoologists, while fully realising the justice and utility of the rule of priority in the choice of scientific names for animals as Occasional A\)tes. 25 first laid down by a commiltee of the British Association iu 1842, wish to protest ai>aiiist the abuse to which it has been put as a result of the most recent codes of nomenclature, and consider that names which have had currency for a great number of j'ears should, unless preoccupied, be retained in the sense in which they have been universally used. Con- sidering the confusion that must result from the strict application of the rule of pi-iority, they would welcome action leading to the adoption of a scheme by which such names as have received the sanction of general usage, and have been invariably employed by the masters of zoology in the past century, would be scheduled as unremovable. (Signed) E, Ray Lankestek, A. Skdgwick, P. Chalmers Mitchell, Sydney J. Hickson, E,. Bowdler Sharps, J.Arthur Thompson, Gilbert C. Bourne, E. S. Goodrich, J. J. Lister, W. C. McIntosh, F. Jeffery Bell, W. T, Calman, W. E. Hoyle, A. M. Norman, J. Graham Kerr, Albert Gunthkr, J. Cossar Ewart, D'Aroy W. Thompson, Henry Woodward, E. A. Minchin, P. L. Sclater, W. N. Parker, W. J. Sollas, Edward B. PouLTt)N, C. O. Waterhouse, A. Smith Woodward, S. E. IIarmer, W. Bateson, D. Sharp, J. Stanley Gardiner, and G. A. Boulenger. In view of this strong expression of opinion from leading zoologists it would be supposed that due deference would be paid to it, and that even those m-Iio could not bring them- selves entirely to agree with it, would at least refrain from acting in direct opposition to the wishes of so many distin- guished biologists. What is the result so far as British ornithology is concerned ? The recent publication of a new ' List of British Birds ' *, in which the authors, so far from deferring to the expressed wishes of much better judges than themselves, act in direct opposition to their views, and pro- pose a complete revolution in nomenclature. That they have so acted in perfect good faith and honesty of purj)Ose we have no doubt whatever, but we consider their action to be not only injudicious, but calculated to defeat its object — uniformity and finality iu the nomenclature of British birds. * ' A Hand-list of British Birds.' With an Account of the Distri- bution of each Species in the British Isles and Abroad. By Ernst Harlert, r. C. ii. Jourdain, N. E. Ticehurst, and H. F. Witherby. 8vo, pp. 237. London : Witherby & Co. 26 Occasional JVotes. To attempt a detailed criticism of the list^ which extends to 237 pages, is not possible in the space here available ; it mast suffice to state a few of the more serious objections which call for protest. As examples of the revolutionary changes of name for familiar species take Dandalus ruhecula melop/tiliis for the robin, which has been known from the time of Cuvier (1800) as Erithacus ruhecula ; Turdus pldlo- melus clarkei for the common song thrush ; Tyto alha alba for the common barn owl; Strepto-pelia turtur ^ov i\ie connnon turtledove, instead of Turtur commuuis, in general use for seventy-five years. As examples of the triple repetition of generic names take Orlolus oriolus oi'iolus for the golden oriole, known since the days of Linnajus as Oriolus (jalbula; Chlor'is c. c. for the greenfinch, substituting Chloris of 13oie (182G) for Fringilla of Linnaeus (17G(J) ; Coccotliraustes c. c. for the hawfinch ; Pica p. p. for the magpie ; Apus a. a. for the swift ; Perdix p. p. for the common partridge. As examples of unnecessary trinomials take Fringilla ccelehs ccelehs, and Alauda arvensis arvensis, so named to distinguish it from a single pale-coloured skylark obtained in Scotland and unnecessarily named Alauda arvensis cinerea. Direct contravention of a rule which the authors of the list quote with a])proval (Introd. p. ix. art. 19) : " The original ortho- graphy of a name is to be preserved unless an error of transcription, a lapsus calami, or a typographical error is evident." Nevertheless, they perpetuate such errors as Spermologus galuc^otes^ bosc/ms, rusticola, ochropAus, and others. A propos the name boschas (rectius boscas) the height of absurdity is reached by giving priority to the name ]>laf//- rliyncha for the common wild duck on the ground that in Linnajus's ' Systenui Naturae ' it happened to be printed two pages earlier. S.irely both names were published simul- taneously. Moreover, in his twelfth edition Linna3us himself admitted that by platyrliynclia he meant the female shoveler, as would naturally be surmised, for he was not in the habit of bestowing inappropriate descriptive names. The separation of so-called " British forms " of well-known Occasional Notes. 27 anil generally (li.stributed species is a niodern innovation which does not commend itself to common sense, when it is remembered thut most of them are in the habit of migrating to and from the Continent. This periodical migration is adniitt(;d by the authors of the list (p. 42) in the case of the great tit, yet they propose to distinguish the " British form^^ of this bird as Farus major newtoni. These distinctions apparently are based upon the very slightest differences in shade of colour, due to hatural causes — age, sex, or season — and if a series of continental and British examj)les are laid out side by side the colours will be found to inter- grade so insensibly that it is impossible to say where one " form " ends and the other begins. In regard to such changes as we have indicated our com- plaint is that so far from bringing about uniformity in nomenclature, they only create unnecessary confusion, and establish no finality. To give a sing'e example, let us take the case of the familiar merlin, which has been known as Falco aesalon since 1788, when Gmelin adopted that specific name from Brisson's descri{)tion. From that date this name was in general use until 1874, when Sharpe, desiring to give priority to an older name, substituted Falco regulus of Pallas, 1773, and accordingly this name found its way into Vol. I. of the 'British Museum Catalogue of Birds,' and, being "published by authority," was in a fair way of being adopted by a younger generation of naturalists. It was discovered, however, that regulus of Pallas was after all not the earliest specific name for the merlin, for Tunstall, in his •' Ornithologia Britannica/ 1771, had already used the name aesalon. Ac- cordingly aesalon (from Pliny's name for the merlin, aLaciXwv) was reinstated, and has been in general use until the present time. Messrs. Hartert and Co. now propose that regulus should be once more restored, on the ground that Tunstall's work, being merely a list of names without descriptions, should not be quoted, though they inconsistently adopt (p. Ill) Tunstall's name for the peregrine. Tunstall employ in o- Brisson's name aesalon (as did also Gmelin in 1778) there could be no possible doubt, from their description, as to the 28 Occasional Notes. species lie intended to indicate. " This," sa} s Seebohni, "is auotlier instance of the folly of still adhering to the law of priority which has done so much mischief to the study of birds." Still more ol^jectionable is it to find amongst the changes advocated by Messrs. Hartcrt and Co. the transference of long-established names from one S})ecies to another. Thus the appropriate name Dnisicus, so long a[)[)lied to the song thrush, they suggest should be bestowed on the redwing {Tioxlus iliacus) while the familiar thrush they would rename 2\n'dus philomelus clarldi, Hartert ! Now if any reader will take the trouble to refer to the twelfth edition of Linnceus's ' Systema/ 176G — the stai ting point fixed fixed for nomenclature by the committees of the British Association and the British Ornithologists' Union — ■ and read the diagnoses given by Linnseus of the two species named by him iliacus and miisicvs (vol. i., p. 292), it will be perfectly clear that the former bird, ^' alis siibtas ferrugineis, superciliis albicantibus,^' is the redwing; the latter, remigihus hasl interiore ferrugineis, which " dwells in the woods, makes a, nest with mud, and sings in the evening from the summit of a tree/' is evidently the song thrush. Why then transpose these two names after a hundred and fifty years of universal approval ? Apparently because they had been inadvertently so transposed in an earlier edition of the woik, 1758. But Linnpeus, liavino- rectified the mistake in the last edition published in his lifetime, 17GG, should surely be given credit for the correction. We have here an example of the trans- ference of a name from one species to another. Let us now look at the case of transferring the names of genera. Messrs Hartert and Co. place the grebes in the genus Colgmhus, and remove the divers from Colymlus to Gavia ! The sandpipers are hopelessly confused by throwing two readily distinguishable genera [Tringa and Totanus) into one genus, Tringa, and transferring one of them, Tringa alpina, together with the smaller stints {minuta, temminckii, &c.) into a different genus, Erolia. Occasional Notes. 29 In pleading for all these changes on the score of effecting '* uniformity," Messrs. Hartert and Co. in their introduction make the extraordinary statement that "we have neglected for 150 years one of the requisites of greatest importance.'' They altogether ignore the work of the British Association connnittees of 1842 and 1863, and the British Ornithologists' Union in 1883, although these committees included such well-known biologists as Darwin, Owen, Henslow, Jenyns^ AVestvvood, Yarrell, Strickland, Jardine, Wallace, Sclater, Spence Bate, Bentham, Hooker, Huxley, and Newton, all of whom thought it desiral)le that no names should be adoi)ted of an earlier date than 1766, the date of the twelfth edition of Linnpeus, the last published in his lifetime. Notwithstanding this weighty expression of opinion, and the protest of the memorialists of 1908 already referred to, the authors of the new list of British birds adopt the tenth edition of the ' Systema,' 1758, thereby giving rise to innumer- able changes of names to no advantage. Having then fixed upon the date 1758 as the starting point, they rake up from long-forgotten works subsequently published names not hitherto heard of, and propose to substitute them for those which, from long use, have become well established. Hence the present trouble. It appears that they base their list on rules drawn np by an international committee in 1905, though surely, as sticklers for priority, they should abide by the well- considered rules framed by the earlier committees of 1842 and 1863. Mr. Eagle Clarke, writing in the 'Scottish Naturalist,' has put the matter fairly in saying that " many of the changes in the new li^t are made on trivial grounds, while others show a total disregard for the serious confusion their acceptance would entail." Dr. P. L. Sclater, who has published a commentary on the new list in the current number of ' The Ibis,' expresses his o{)inion that " it contains some very objectionable features.'' In order to show the changes which would have to be made in the 'List of British Birds' drawn up in 1883 by a com- mittee of the British Ornithologists' Union — [lopularly known 30 Occasional Xotcs. as the 13. 0. U. List — he has prepared a tahle which shows that of 376 names therein included, no fewer than 200 would require alteration ! This he considers is " so great a defect in the projected change that the alterations could not be effected." In this opinion we quite agree. It is a significant fact that in res[)onse to a circular issued by the German Zoological Society, no fewer than 635 zoologists voted against the application of the rule of strict priority as propounded by the International Zoological Con- gress, and a similar opinion has been expressed in a vote of the Scandinavian naturalists and a vote given by the com- mittee of the British Association. Tliose of our readers who may be in doubt whether to accept or reject the list now under consideration will do well to await the appearance of a new edition of the B. 0. U. List, which, we understand, is in active preparation. The simplest way out of the difficulty, as it seems to us, is to ignore the new list. — From 'The Field ^ of March SiJi, 1913. 3. The following appeared in the ' Pretoria News," shortly after the appointment on 1st January, 1914, which might interest readers of this Journal : — The Zoo. The New Director. — The appointment has been confirmed of Mr. Alwin K. Haagner as Director of the Zoological Gardens, a position for which he is eminently fit- ted. Born in tlie Eastern Province, he took to zoology as a hobby at the age of 16. His first scientific paper was published when he was only twenty, and since then he has contributed very many articles to such magazines as * The Ibis^ and 'The Zoologist.^ He also wrote the letterpress of ' Sketches of South African Bird Life,' which met with success, and a second edition of wdiich is now in the press. In March 1909 lie received a diploma from the Hungarian Department of Agriculture for ornithological work, and is an Honorary Member of the British Ornithological Union and a fellow of the Zoological Society of London. In March 190-1 Short Notices of Ovnhholo