oh die sh ag = aa my ; : : os We Me : - sinegelntiet Sitrotesanes Pic dbnes - ether rari rae na tiga ews ios ey em eee eae b=, Tee LIAM WESLEY & Son, ikeellers & ublishers, ssex Street, Strand, RAED A CLARO A EX LIBRIS Wilham Healey Dall Division of Mollusks Sectional Library 2 LETC COUT ETOTE ‘ ‘ f - a ' ~ 7a) he ; > ee - a 2 + t ‘ . a a ~ an 1 ’ " 4, _ hie. 2 ? He « i .* . ~ < tye oe va : " ~* A ° - % —- > ~ ly ’ . a ¥ ~ 4 i. a «Lt ~% 7 = y > f. -4 ‘ a ¥ | oe) ‘ 48. als : d a —. £ S ,.¢ Pali ling 7 = —— 7 os - ~*~ ’ - . r © - é i e only . ‘ a ert re Pa ~ « * ‘ ' . ~ ' om —_ = GS / LAND AND FRESHWATER < MOLLUSCA OF INDIA, Division of Mollusks Sectional Lilbroxy INCLUDING . SOUTH ARABIA, BALUCHISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, KASHMIR, NEPAL, BURMAH, PEGU, TENASSERIM, MALAY PENINSULA, CEYLON, AND OTHER ISLANDS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN. SUPPLEMENTARY TO MESSRS. THEOBALD AND HANLEY’S CONCHOL@GGIA INDICA. BY. Lizut.-CotoneL H. H. GODWIN-AUSTEN, FRS., F.G.S, F.Z8., &., LATE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, IN CHARGE OF THE KHASI, GARO, AND NAGA-HILLS SURVEY PARTY. VOLUME I. LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 1889. PRINTFD BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. LN ERO DU; CTL ON, In issuing the First Part of ‘Land and Freshwater Mollusca of India,’ the undersigned is attempting to carry out what the editors of the ‘ Conchologia Indica’ express a hope of at the end of their Preface. They say that work was never in- tended to be exhaustive, but to assemble in one book species which were dispersed in scores of other volumes. I can hope to do but little more. But the ‘ Conchologia Indica’ was brought to an end before the editors had exhausted all the known species from India; and since then a very large number of new forms have been discovered in that vast country, with its varied climate and conditions, and where every year new areas are visited by the naturalist and collector. Although I have published many new species brought together by myself, there are still many left in my collection; while H. F. and W. T. Blanford, Col. Beddome, W. Theobald, Geoffrey Nevill, Col. Main- waring, Dr. Hungerford, Dr. Townshend, Professor J. Bayley Balfour in Socotra, Messrs. M. T. Ogle, A. Chenneil, W. Robert, and H. Godwin-Austen have added many an addi- tional species to the list, so that there is no lack of material. With the aid of the above gentlemen and others I hope to make this supplementary work as valuable as its predecessor. Mr. W. T. Blanford, in a late paper in the ‘Journal of A2 iv INTRODUCTION. the Asiatic Society of Bengal’ *, summing up what has been done in Indian conchology, says :—‘ The same decade (1870 to 1880) has seen the completion of a series of illustrations, many of them well executed, of Indian land and freshwater shells, the ‘Conchologia India’ of Hanley and Theobald. The work is mainly due to Mr. Hanley, upon whom the whole of the editorial labour has falien, Mr. Theobald having been absent in India during the publication. Whilst it is impossible to avoid regretting that more complete illustrations of most of the species have not been given, and that some additional details have not been furnished in the accompany- ing letterpress, it is unquestionable that the plates are a valuable contribution to the knowledge of Indian Mollusca. ....+. ‘lwo other rather important works on Indian land and freshwater shells have been issued since the completion of the ‘Conchologia Indica.’ One of these is Mr. Theobald’s ‘Catalogue of the Land and Freshwater Shells of British India,’ the other Mr. G. Nevill’s ‘ Hand-list of the Mollusca in the Indian Museum, Calcutta,’ Part I. ..... This work is especially important for the large number of exact localities given; ..... and in many points the classification adopted for the Helicidz of India is a considerable improve- ment on any thing that had previously been published. At the same time there is, I believe, very much more to be done before these puzzling shells are properly arranged.” Every illustrated work of this kind is a step in advance in the study of Natural History; and I propose, besides the figuring of new species, to take up those minute forms that have not been sufficiently enlarged and well drawn in the ‘ Conchologia Indica,’ such as the small forms of Helices, and those among the Cyclophoridz and Helicinide—A/lyceus, Diplommatina, Acmella, Georissa, &c. * “ Contributions to Indian Malacology.—No. XII.” (Dee. 1, 1880). INTRODUCTION. v Drawings of the animals will also be added, with the ana- tomy whenever it can be obtained, showing the odontophore &c., by the help of which I trust we shall be able to arrive at some better-defined system of classification to what we have now, based solely on shell-characters. We shall then be better able to understand the relationship between our Indian genera and those of the neighbouring regions which are being worked out on one side by Professor von Martens and O. Semper, and on the African &c. by Professor A. Morelet, J. R. Bourguignat, aud many other foreign conchologists. Not the least important part of the work will be attention to the record of accurate distribution of species; and I shall always give the exact locality and districts of India, with elevation &c. I shall not limit myself to political boundaries, or what is termed British India; such boundaries are being constantly altered or overstepped by the naturalist; the progress of a friendly mission or the entry of a punitive force into some adjacent independent country brings a fresh crop of objects of natural history. I therefore take as a northern limit the watershed of all the rivers that flow into the Indian Ocean through the countries named on the titlepage ; thus the Indus will include the whole of Afghanistan and Kafiristan, Swat, Gilgit, Baltistan or Little Tibet, Ladak, Rudok up to the Manasarowa Lake. The Brahmaputra will include that vast unknown country northwards and eastwards of the junction of the Dihong and Dibong rivers, any part of which we may see, and I hope to see, explored within the next four or five years, and the same of the Irrawaddy and Salween, while the southern extension of the Mulé-it range, in Tenasserim, down to the Malay Peninsula, gives a very well-defined boundary in that direction. I have included South Arabia as far as the vicinity of Aden, because on that side we have a mingling of East- vi INTRODUCTION. African and Indian forms. Unless we take the wide area indicated above, we shall never be able thoroughly to eluci- date the distribution of the different genera and species, and how they overlap the confines of the Oriental, Palearctic, African, and Malayan Regions. A great want in India at present is that of good text-books on the Natural History of the country for the use of Euro- pean and native students. The Vertebrata have received attention, and many able works have been written on some classes: all these, however, are not brought up to our present knowledge. But nothing has ever been attempted among the vast array of the Invertebrata; and I only hope that the small additional labour I bestow on one group, the Mollusca, will hereafter lead up to such Handbooks being published ; but I fear nothing can be expected without some Government assistance, such as was once afforded to Dr. T. C. Jerdon to bring out the ‘ Birds of India.’ H. H. GODWIN-AUSTEN. ERRATA IN PARTS I. & II. Page 11, line 12-from top, for Lithocystis read Liocystis. » 26, ,, 24 from top, for tubiniformis read turbiniformis. » 984, ,, 5 from bottom, for Thamandaiva read Thamandava. » 40, ,, 22 from top, for Nolamullies read Kolamullies. » 59, ,, 20 from bottom, erase (Jarava). » 99, ,, 17 from bottom for inerescens read virescens. ERRATA. Parr IlJ.—January 1883. Page 80, line 17 from bottom, for plate xi. read plate ii. 94, Plate XIX. fig. 1, for Bhangulpur read Bhaugulpur. 94, ,, XIX. fig. 4, after perplana, Nevill, insert MS. » 94, ,, XX. fig. 2, for Macrochlamys read Kaliella. ” Part IV. (Plates).—September 1885. Plate XLII., read ArricaRIon PALLENS?, Morelet (received as Vitrina riippel- liana, Pfr., Abyssinia, from Mr. Damon). LAND AND FRESHWATER MOLLUSCA OF kN De bo AY Family ZONITIDA*. Subgenus Karrerya, (Plates I. & IT.) This genus was formed by Mr. W. T. Blanford in February 1863, and published in the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ +; he included in it :— 1. fastigiata, Hutton. Western Himalayas, Nilgiri Hills. 2. barrakporensis, Pfr. Base of Sikkim Himalayas, and Kal- ryenmullay Hills, near Salem, in 8. India (/ote). 3. aspirans, W. & H. Blanf. Nilgiri Hills, Now the first type-shell, fastigiata from the Nilgiri Hills, as I show further on, is not Hutton’s species from the N.W. Himalaya, which Mr. Blanford I do not think then had had an opportunity of comparing it with; so we must fall back on barrakporensis, and take * The genera and subgenera will be treated of in no particular order at present, but as data concerning them can be put together and the drawings completed. The classification can hereafter be attempted ; we shall then be better able to judge what weight, generic or subgeneric, to give to the many genera now recorded from the Indian Region. t “On Indian Species of Land-Shells belonging to the Genera Helix, Linn., and Nanina, Gray.” 2 LAND AND FRESHWATER it as the typical form of the genus. Fortunately, it is immaterial in this instance which species is taken, for it is quite clear what group of shells Aalella is intended to include, and either three species might be taken for the type. I wish one could say this of some other genera—Nanina, Gray, for instance. The first two species of Mr. Blanford’s genus were included by Albers (‘ Die Heliceen,’ 1860, edit. Von Martens) in his genus Trochomorpha; but, as he has taken trochiformis, Fér., from the Fiji Islands, as the type, it must be exclusively used for species from that part of the world, which are not at all likely to be related to these Indian forms; moreover, when Trochomorpha was made to hold such very dissimilar shells as fas- tigiata, anceps, and serrula, the sooner it was restricted the better ; and attegia, infula, cacuminifera, and arv were soon removed from it by Stoliczka, the first becoming the type of his genus Conulema (J. A. S. B. 1871, p. 236), the second the type of Adams’s genus Sitala, which has priority. Drawings of species of this genus I hope to give at an early date. KALreLLA BARRAKPORENSIS, Pfr. (Plate I. fig. 1.) H. barrakporensis, Pfr. P. Z.S. Dec. 1852, p. 156; Chemn. ed. ii. Helix, n. 969, t. 147. figs. 20, 22; Conch. Ind. pl. lxxxvii. f. 7; Theob. Suppl. Cat. C. I. p. 20; Benson, Ann. & Mag. N. H. April 1859, p. 272; Nevill, Hand-l. 1878, p. 41. no. 191. Original description :—‘ H. testa subperforata, elevato-trochiformi, tenui, striatula, nitida, pellucida, fusco-cornea ; spira conica, acuti- uscula ; sutura profunda; anfr. 6, convewis, lente accrescentibus, ultimo carinato, non descendente, bast conveviusculo ; apertura vie obliqua, depressa, subangulato-lunari ; perist. simplici, tenui, recto, margine columellari brevi, ad perforationem punctiformem reflexi- usculo. “ Diam. 33, alt. 34 mill. “ Hab, ad Barrakpore, Indise (Bacon),” The animal is of a pale colour, with a distinct gland at the ex- tremity of the foot, with a well-defined lobe above it. Stoliczka, in his description attached to a drawing left to us by him, says— ‘“T have not seen any mantle-lobes; pinkish grey, tentacles and head darker.” In J. A.S. B. 1871, p. 237, the same author writes— “The anatomy of H. barrakporensis closely resembles that of Conulema, but the dentition is different, that species haying fewer teeth in a transverse row and a great number of the median ones enlarged, all being squarish, not pectiniform.” Locality ? Ex Museum Cuming, now in collection of W. T. Blanford, marked an authentic specimen. Shell pyramidal, subperforate ; sculpture very fine close-set rib- bing, with fine spiral lines on base; colour umber-brown ; spire high, conic, sides slightly convex; suture moderately deep; whorls 53, convex, keeled on last, convex below; aperture suboblique, quadrately lunate ; peristome thin, columellar margin subvertical and slightly reflected near the perforation. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 3 *Size: major diam. 0°12 inch, alt. axis 0°1 inch. 2 3:0 mm., a 2:6 mm. KALIELLA BARRAKPORENSIS, Pfr. (Plate I. fig. 2.) Locality. Barisal, forty miles above, near the river Megna, Lower Bengal (G.-A.). Shell pyramidal, somewhat depressed, base flat ; sculpture rather close, fine costulation, each rib distinct, the spiral sculpture on the base like that of Mussoorie specimens (Plate I. fig. 36); colour horny brown; spire moderately high, broadly conic, sides very slightly convex; suture shallow; whorls 5, sides flatly convex ; aperture quadrate ; peristome thin, columellar margin subvertical. Size: major diam. 0°13 inch, alt. axis 0-09 inch. = 3°3 mm., Fe 2°3 mm. In a paper entitled “‘ Notes on the Land and Freshwater Shells of Kashmir &c.” (J. A. S. B. 1878, p. 142), Mr. W. Theobald remarks that the specific name of this shell is badly chosen, this being a hill- species (not found on the plains, unless transported on plants). I found it very abundant in the above locality in the bamboo-clumps. KALIELLA BARRAKPORENSIS, Pfr., = sivalensis, Hutton, var. (Plate I. figs. 3, 3a, 36, and Plate II. fig. 1.) Locality. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya, about 7000 feet (G‘-A.). Shell scarcely perforate, conoid, base flat; sculpture distinct, fine transverse ribbing, close set, touching, the spiral striation on the base regular and wide apart, 4 to 5 lines =-005 inch (Plate I. fig. 3 6); colour pale brown; spire high, pyramidal, sides convex: suture shallow ; whorls 7, flat; aperture semilunar; peristome thin, re- flected on columellar margin, which is perpendicular. Size: major diam, 0-14 inch, alt. axis 0°10 inch. 38 *3°6 mm. “ 2:5 mm. Benson, in ‘Descriptions of new Helicide contained in the Darji- ling Collections of Messrs. W.T. and H. F. Blanford” (A. & M.N. H., Apr. 1859), writes :—“Two bleached and broken specimens of a small shell allied to H. fastigiata, Hutton, from the Western Hima- laya, were found by Mr. W. T. Blanford at Pankabari and in the Rungun valley, at elevations of 1000 and 4000 feet. They cannot be distinguished from Pfeiffer’s H. barrakporensis, of which speci- mens were sent to me by the late Dr. J. F. Bacon from Titalya, on the border of the Sikkim Terai, before the shell was seen by Dr. Pfeiffer ; others were more recently taken by Capt. Hutton in the Dhoon valley, below Landour, and were transmitted to me by him under the MS. name of sivalensis, H. ..... The occurrence of * In all descriptions the most reliable measurement is that of the major diameter ; not so that of the height, for it is often doubtful Aow it has been taken. Tn this and the following descriptions the height of the shell is taken from the lowest portion of the body-whorl at the columnar margin to the apex; this I have found much easier to take than the vertical distance from the lowest edge of the aperture to the apex. It is simple enough with the ordinary measuring instruments when dealing with solid strong shells, but very dangerous with small fragile forms, 4 LAND AND FRESHWATER Hl, barrakporensis near Calcutta is more than doubtful. There is a country-house called ‘ Titalya,’ near Barrackpore, which may have given rise to an error in the statement of the locality of the species.” It will be seen, however, below that both Nevill and Stoliczka have taken it in or near Calcutta. Mr. Theobald (1. ¢. p. 142) records a single specimen of this species from Kashmir, 6 mm. in height. This must be either an error in measurement or it is another species, for I have never seen among hundreds of specimens any approaching this size. Nevill gives (/.c. p. 41) the following localities :—1. Parasnath (Stol); 2. Pegu (Stol); 3. Prome (W. v. B.); 4. Thyat Myo (Dr. Hunger, ford); 5. Teria Ghat (G.-A.); 6. Khandala (Stol); 7. Cal- cutta (Nevill & Stol). It would be ee to see those from No. 6; those from Burmeh are very possibly A. vulcani, described further on. KALIELLA CHERRAENSIS, n. sp. (Plate I. figs. 5, 5a.) Locality. Cherra Poonjee, Khasi Hills (G.-A.). Shell elongately pyramidal, scarcely perforate ; sculpture very fine, regular transverse ribbing, with very fine, regular, close-set spiral ribbing on the base, 12 lines =:005 inch (fig. 5a); colour dull brown; spire high, sides convex; suture shallow; whorls 6, sides flatly convex, a distinct sulcation on the keel of the last; aperture semilunate ; peristome thin. Size: major diam. 0:10 inch, alt. axis 0-09 inch. .. 2°5 mm., . 2-3 mm. Garo Hills, one specimen. Very smooth, but under lens has micro- scopic transverse ribbing. The largest are from Teria Ghat. Height of spire equal to diameter of base; major diameter 3:0 mm.; colour ochraceous; whorls 7 ; ribbing very distinct (Plate I. fig. 7 and Plate II. fig. 2). I have three specimens, from the Dikrang valley, Dafla Hills, from the North Cachar Hills, and Laisen in the Naga Hills. KALIELLA CHERRAENSIS, n. var. (Plate I. fig. 6.) Locality. Forty miles above Barisal, on the river Megna, Lower Bengal (G.-A.). Sculpture very fine, regular, rather distant costulation, with very fine, close-set spiral striation on base, while in many specimens quite smooth ; colour pale ochraceous brown; spire, vide description of the Khasi shell. Size: major diam. 0°15 inch, alt. axis 0-11 inch. Be 2-7 mm, 7 2-8 mm. This shell is almost identical with the Khasi- Hill species, being, perhaps, rather more convex on the side of the spire, a character which distinguishes all the forms of Kaliella from those hills from the much more flatter-sided barrakporensis of the N.W. Himalaya &e. The waters of the Barak in Sylhet drain into the Megna, and this species must be constantly washed down by them. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 5 KALIELLA KHASIACA, n. sp. (Plate I. fig. 8.) Locality. North Khasi, numerous (G.-A.). Shell imperforate, elongately conical, rather tumid; sculpture microscopic ribbing, quite smooth under ordinary lens; colour glassy white; spire conic, sides convex ; suture impressed; whorls 8, sides convex ; aperture almost semicircular; peristome thin, columellar margin perpendicular, rounded below. Size: major diam. 0°09 inch, alt. axis 0°15 inch. - 2-3 1mmi,, - 2:7 mm. KALIELLA MUNIPURENSIS, n. sp. (Plate I. fig. 9, and Plate IT. fig. 3.) Locality. Munipur Hills, N.E. frontier (G-A.). Shell elongately conical, base flat ; sculpture fine transverse continu- ous ribs, very fine and close, concentric on the basal side; colour dull ochraceous; spire as high as breadth at base, conic, sides rounded, apex blunt; suture impressed ; whorls 63, slightly convex; aperture semicircular ; peristome thin, columellar margin slightly curved. Size: major diam. 3:0 mm., alt. axis 3:0 mm. This shell differs from the Cherra and Khasi species in the whorls being more convex, more tumid below, and the columellar margin not so oblique. It is nearest in shape to A. aspirans of Southern India. KALIELLA MUNIPURENSIS, var. (Plate I. fig. 10.) Locality. Phinggam, Lahipa Naga Hills, 5000 feet (G.-A.). Shell elongately pyramidal, keeled, but not sharply; sculpture fine transverse ribbing on whorls, fine radiating on base; colour bleached ; spire high, sides convex ; suture shallow ; whorls 53, sides flatly convex ; aperture semiovate ; peristome thin, columellar margin strong, perpendicular. Size: major diam. 0-09 inch, alt. axis 0:09 inch. 5 2°3 mm., ‘s 2°3 mm. KALIELLA SIGURENSIS, n. sp. (Plate I. fig. 11.) Locality. Nilgherri Hills, Seegoor Ghat and Neddiwuttom Passes (W. T. Blanford). Shell subperforate, conical, rather flat on base; sculpture rather fine, irregular-sized, transverse ribbing, especially well developed on base, with no spiral ribbing there; colour, umber-brown epidermis ; spire conic, sides rounded ; whorls 7, sides rounded ; aperture lunate ; peristome well rounded below, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 0-13 inch, alt. axis 0-12 inch. " 3:25'mm., ~ ,; 30 mm. Animal unknown. This is the shell referred to by Messrs. W.'T. and H. F. Blanford, after the description of H. aspirans, in J. A. 8. B. 1861, p. 356, as closely resembling H. fustigiata, Hutton, from the above loca- lities. In Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection I find he must have 6 LAND AND FRESHWATER afterwards altered his opinion regarding it, for the label ( fastigiata) is covered with another (barrakporensis); but, although close, it is certainly not that species; and in the same paper (Contributions to Indian Malacology, No. I. p. 358) H. barrakporensis is referred to, and a figure is given on plate ii. fig. 5 of a specimen received from Mr. R. Bruce Foote, who found it on the Kalryenmullay group of hills near Salem. I have given a copy of this figure (Plate I. fig. 4), and which appears to be this species. But the shell is not in Mr. Blanford’s collection, which he has, during his absence in India, so kindly left with me to refer to and take care of. H. fastigiata, Hutton, of the N.W. Himalaya, does not occur in South India; and Mr. Foote’s specimen of barrakporensis may present, on a closer examination, some slight difference from the type form. The drawing shows it to have very flat sides to the spire, with a very acuminate apex. Kazretta asprrans, W. T. & H. F. BIf. (Plate I. fig. 12, from specimen in coll. W. T. Blanford.) Locality. Nilgherri Hills, Madras (W. 7. B.). Described in the J. A. S. B. 1861, p. 355, pl. 1. fig. 12, very roughly drawn. Type from near Pykara, rare. Conch. Indica, pl. xvi. fig. 4 is not in the least like; it gives the idea of a thickened peristome. Th. Cat. Conch. Ind. p. 20. Ney. Hand-list (1878), p. 41. no. 197. Original description :—“ Testa viv perforata, elevata, pyramidalis, via striata, tenuis, cornea. Spira turrita, apice obtusa, sutura parum profunda, Anfr. 7, convexiusculi, lente crescentes, ultimus non de- scendens, basi convexus, carina obtusa, prope aperturam evanescente, circumdatus. Apertura subverticalis, transverse lunata, semicireularis ; peristoma tenue, rectum, marginibus distantibus, columellari breviter reflewiusculo. “Major diam. 2:0 mm., alt. axis 3-0 mm. 0-08 inch, ,, 0-12 inch.” 39 KALIELLA VULCANI, n. sp. (Plate I. fig. 13.) Locality. Puppd-doung Hill, Burmah (W. 7’. Blanford). Shell ovately conical, rather tumid ; sculpture transverse, mode- rately close ribbing, on base radiating from umbilicus; colour (bleached) apparently of usual horny colour; spire conic, moderately high, sides convex, apex well rounded; suture shallow ; whorls 6, sides convex ; aperture widely lunate, slight angulation below ; peristome thin, slightly reflected; columellar margin straight, subvertical. Size: major diam, 0-12 inch, alt. axis 0-09 inch. 35 3°0 mm., i 2:3 mm. Puppé-doung is an extinct volcano in Upper Burmah below Mandalay, and some 25 miles from Pagan, on the left bank of the MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 7 Irrawaddy. The specimen described was given me by Mr. W. T. Blanford, who collected so many fine shells in that country. It is an interesting species, in its convex sides approaching the N.E. frontier forms, but at same time not like any of them in the rounded form of the apex and large aperture. EXPLANATION OF PLATE I. (All figs. enlarged seven times.) Fig. 1. Kaliella barrakporensis, Pfr., typical. Locality ? 2 Near Barisal, Lower Bengal. 3, 3a, , =sivalensis, Hutton. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya. 36. : sculpture on base, X 50. 4 to 5 lines=0-005 inch. 4. , close to barrakporensis; copy of figure in J.A.S.B. Salem, Madras. 5. cherraensis, G.-A. Cherra Poonjee, Khasi Hills. 5a. : sculpture on base, X 50. 12 lines=0:005 inch. 6. —— , var. Near Barisal, Lower Bengal. (.— Fine specimen, Teria Ghat, Khasi Hills. 8. —— khasiaca, G.-A. Khasi Hills, northern slopes. 9. munipurensis, G.-A, Munipur Hills. 9a. : sculpture, x 50. 10. —— , var. Phinggam, Lahipa Naga Hills. 11. —— sigurensis, G.-A. Seegoor Ghat and Neddiwuttom Passes, Nilgherri Hills. 12. aspirans, W.T.& H. F. Blf. Nilgherri Hills. 13. —— vuleani, G.-A. Puppa-doung Hill, Burmah, KALrerta garnttaca, n. sp. (Plate II. fig. 4.) Locality. Marangsip Peak, South Jaintia Hills, 5350 feet. Shell subglobosely conoid, keeled, well rounded below ; sculpture very close-set fine transverse costulation, concentric on base; colour pale olivaceous umber-brown; spire conic, flatly convex; suture impressed ; whorls 54, sides convex ; aperture ovately lunate, sub- vertical; peristome thin, very slightly reflected, columellar margin subvertical. Size: major diam. 0°13 inch, alt. axis 0°09 inch. e 373 mm., rs 2°3 mm. Three specimens are from Marangsip Peak and two from Sher- faisip Peak, 5600 feet. This species is very near barrakporensis, but is more convex on side of the spire and more tumid below, with much wider and more open aperture. KALIELLA CosTULATA, n. Sp. (Plate II. fig. 5.) 204 of Nevill’s Hand-list, p. 42 (not named). Locality. Tanir Ridge, Dafla Hills, Assam, 4400 feet (Godwin- Austen). Shell pyramidal, sharply keeled, a single raised rib on the peri- phery ; sculpture distant very distinct transverse costulation, irre- gular longitudinal strie below ; colour very pale olivaceous brown ; 8 LAND AND FRESHWATER spire high, sides flat; suture moderate ; whorls 6, sides flat (species not quite fully grown); aperture semiovate ; peristome thin, slightly reflected on columellar margin. Size: major diam. 0°13 inch, alt. axis 0-11 inch. m 33 mm., ss 2°8 mm. Assimilates in its distinct costulation to the next species, but is much larger, with ‘latter sides, and is more pyramidal. One specimen, Hengdan Peak, North Cachar Hills, about 8000 feet. KALIELLA sUBcostuLATA, n.sp. (Plate II. fig. 6.) Locality. North Khasi Hills. Shell pyramidal, umbilicus hidden; sculpture strong, well-defined (often distant) ribbing, also fine radiate ribbing on the base ; colour pale sienna-brown; spire conic, sides very slightly convex, apex acuminate ; suture moderately impressed ; whorls 6, sides convex ; aperture semilunate ; peristome thin, slightly oblique near axis. Size: major diam. 0°11 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. 2°83 mm., 3 2:0 mm, KALIELLA PERAKENSIS, n. sp. (Nevill, MS.). (Plate IT. fig. 7.) Locality. Perak (Dr. H. Townshend). Shell pyramidal, very narrowly umbilicated, keeled ; sculpture fine, somewhat irregularly disposed, transverse costulation on the basal side, fine, close, regular, spiral or longitudinal ribbing; colour whitish grey ; spire conoid, sides moderately convex, apex subacute ; suture impressed; whorls 6, sides moderately convex; aperture semilunate ; peristome rather thickened, strong, perpendicular or angulate below at the columellar margin. Size: major diam. 0°15 inch, alt. axis 0-12 inch. Me 3°8 mm. a 3'1 mm. KALIELLA FASTIGIATA, Hutton. (Plate II. fig. 8.) Paper on the Land and Freshwater Shells of the Western Hima- laya, by Lieut. T. Hutton, 37th Regt. N.I., and W. H. Benson, Esq., G.8.,. J. AxS.B: wolovwi..pt. de peg tye Type from Landour, N.W. Himalaya, Chemn. ed. Kuster, Helia, p, 141, £. 15,26: Benson, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. April 1859, p. 272. Nevill, Hand-list (1878), p. 40. no. 190. Yonch. Ind. p. 8, pl. xvi. f. 5. Th. Cat. Conch. Ind. p. 20. Original description :—* Testa parvula, albido-cornea, minutissime granulata, pyramidata, subtus plano-convexa ; anfractibus septem, con- vewiusculis, ultimo acuto angulato, suturis leviter impressis ; umbilico evanescente ; apertura latiore quam longa ; apice obtuso, “ Axis 0°16 mm. “« Animal heliciform, greyish, darker on the tentacula. Found on dead leaves at Simla, in the Ahads (ravines), and when in motion MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 9 carries its shell upright. It is not uncommon, but its smallness renders it difficult to collect (1.). ‘Tt is more lengthened proportionally than either H. turbiniformis of Patargatha and Berhampore, alluded to in p. 357, vol. v. of this Journal Gen. The animal does not appear to exhibit the beautiful dark patches on a light ground which render that shell so conspi- cuous, when the animal is alive, by the appearance of the tints through the translucent shell (B.).” Locality. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya (G-A.). Shell elongately pyramidal ; sculpture, regular fine ribbing ; colour pale brown; spire high, sides slightly convex; suture shallow; whorls 8, sides flatly convex ; aperture semilunate ; peristome thin, perpendicular on the columellar margin. Size: major diam. 0:15 inch, alt. axis 0°14 inch. z 3°7 mm., i 3°8 mm. Benson (J. c.) says “at Mussoorie and Landour H. fastigiata is not uncommon above 5000 and beyond 7000 feet elevation. I procured it most frequently creeping on the large wet leaves of Sawifraga ciliata, in damp and shady situations having a northern aspect.” Nevill (/. ¢.) records it from :—1. Mussoorie, Simla (Stoliczka); 2. Darjiling (Stoliczka and Mainwaring); 3. Arakan Hills (Stoliczka) ; 4. Naga Hills (A. W. Chennell); 5. Dafla Hills (Godwin-Austen). I have not identified any in my own collection from these two last- named localities, and I think no. 3 should be re-examined. KALrIeLLA ELONGATA, n. sp. (Plate IT. fig. 9.) Locality. Raliang, Jaintia Hills (G.-A.). Shell very elongately pyramidal, not umbilicated; sculpture, rib- bing transverse at irregular intervals, some longitudinal or con- centric striation near the umbilical region; colour pale ochraceous brown; spire very high, sides convex ; suture shallow; whorls 10, sides rather convex ; aperture semilunar, suboblique ; peristome thin, reflected, and somewhat strong. Size: major diam. 0°15 inch, alt. axis 0°20 inch. as 33 mm., . 00 mm: KALIgLLA GRATIOSA, n. sp. (Plate II. fig. 10.) Locality. Kopamedza Peak, Anghami Naga Hills, 8375 feet. Shell globosely conoid, angulate on periphery and rounded below, very closely umbilicate; sculpture very fine regular transyerse ribbing, also on the basal side, with a well-marked carination on the keel ; colour pale horny brown; spire moderately high, conoid, blunt ; suture well impressed ; whorls 5, very convex ; aperture semilunate, rounded below ; peristome thin, slightly reflected, suboblique from axis. Size: major diam. 3°5 mm., alt. axis 2°5 mm. KALIELLA NAGAENSIS, n. sp. (Plate II. fig. 11.) Locality. Kopamedza Peak, Anghami Naga Hills, 8375 feet (G.-A.). 10 LAND AND FRESHWATER Shell pyramidal, of thin texture, subperforate ; sculpture, regular distinct oblique costulation, radiating from umbilicus below ; colour pale horny brown; spire high, conic, apex blunt, sides flat ; suture shallow ; whorls 6, sides somewhat convex, the last whorl keeled and with a distinct carination ; aperture semilunate ; peristome thin, slightly reflected near axis, and suboblique. Size: major diam. 0°14 inch, alt. axis 0-10 inch. 3°6 mm., a 2-6 mm. Two specimens, Hengdan Peak, with sculpture finer. KAtreLia ? TERIAENSIS, n, sp. (Plate II. fig. 12.) Locality. Teria Ghat, southern base of Khasi Hills, about 300 feet. Shell depressly pyramidal, rounded on base, narrowly umbilicated ; sculpture, on the upper whorls oblique transverse fine ribbing visible ; colour bleached ; spire conic, sides flat; suture shallow, a thin fine raised beading following it; whorls 5, flattened, the last sharply keeled; aperture oblate; peristome thin, the columella thickened and perpendicular, slightly reflected. Size: major diam. 0-14 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. ‘ 36 mm., sore mnene Oem EXPLANATION OF PLATE II. (All figs. enlarged seven times. ) Fig. 1. Kaliella barrakporensis, Pfr.,=sivalensis, Hutton, var. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya. - cherraensis, G.-A. Teria Ghat, Khasi Hills. munipurensis, G.-A. Munipur. jaintiaca, G.-A. Marangsip Peak, Jaintia Hills. costulata, G.-A. 'Tanir Ridge, Dafla Hills, north of Assam valley. ee hid G.-A. North Khasi Hills. perakensis, G.-A. Perak, Malay Peninsula. fastigiata, Hutton. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya. elongata, G.-A. Raliang, Jaintia Hills. gratiosa, G.-A. Kopamedza Peak, Anghami Naga Hills. nagaensis, G.-A. Kopamedza Peak, Anghami Naga Hills. 12, -—— teriaensis, G.-A. Teria Ghat, base of Khasi Hills, SO GOI Soe UE IRS) 10. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 11 On the Subgenus Microcystina, with Descriptions of the Original and New Species. (Plate III.) This genus was first introduced, but without any description, by Prof. A. O. L. Mérch in his paper on the Shells of the Nicobar Islands, published in the ‘ Journal de Conchyliologie,’ October 1872, p. 311; in the same Journal for October 1876, p. 356, its characters are given—‘ a little notch, narrow and very deep at the columellar margin ;” and he compares it with molecula, Bs., from Burmah ; but I cannot detect in this last any resemblance save in form and polished surface. The columella is not similar*. At the same time (in 1872) we find Prof. Morch creating another subgenus, Litho- cystis, on a species named brunii by him; but no description is given, Helia gouldii, Pfr., miliwm, Martens, and cassidula, Bs., being quoted as similar in form. In 1876 (1. ¢. p. 357), Liocystis, we are told, differs from Microcystina by the columella being twisted in S-form and not notched, and by an unpolished surface f. The shell of W. rinkii is a small one, and the animal was not in a very perfect state, so that I am not able to give a very satisfactory description of its outer form, but it is sufficient to place it in a better position with regard to other genera. Animal. The right shell-lobe was distinguished, and a long nar- row left shell-lobe in two portions (fig. 3). The dorsal lobes were not made out. The extremity of the foot has a long pointed process above the mucous gland (fig. 4). The generative organs (fig. 5) were not all got at in a perfect state. The penis is long, with a slight short twist on the side next the vas deferens, and there is another rather swollen portion with a convolution lower down. The amatory organ, D, is also present. The odontophore (figs. 7 & 7a) I am enabled to describe much more minutely, as it was dissected out very perfectly, the dental formula being— Bh 4odOpDQvFor Lak 21385 to 40 = 44 to 50.1. 44 to 50. The central tooth is very long and sharp-pointed, with two sharp well-developed cusps on either side; the next seven medials are also very clongate and sharp, with a single cusp on the outer lower margin ; in the eighth this is absent, being a plain unicuspid tooth ; the next, the ninth, is bicuspid, with the outer cusp slightly shorter, these two being of transitional form; then follow the series of bi- * Original description :--“ Les Microcystina sont caractérisés par une petite échancrure, étroite et assez profonde, 4 la columelle, qui montre de faibles traces d’une dent obtuse. La coquille est polie sur toute sa surface. L'Helix molecula, Benson, de Birmanie, parait trés-analogue.” + Original description :—‘“ Les Liocystis different des Microeystina par leur columelle tordue en § et non échancrée, et par leur surface non polie,” B 12 LAND AND FRESHWATER cuspid laterals, the points being blunt and rounded. The jaw (fig. 6) is semicircular in form, particularly well rounded on the side of the muscular attachment, while on the cutting-edge it is very convex, and with a well rounded central prominent projection. The odontophore of this subgenus is therefore in every respect similar to that of Macrochlamys, Benson*; and the jaw, though more bent, is also of the same type. This subgenus, therefore, I consider ranks very close to Macro- chlamys, and must be placed at present next it. Whether its cha- racters are sufficient to retain it, is a question that must be settled hereafter, when all these different genera are more closely examined. The shell (fig. 1) is of a solid texture, and the solid or very sinuate form of the columellar margin (fig. 2) is a distinct departure from the oblique and feebly-reflected columellar margin of Macrochlamys. I hope to be able to examine before long some more spirit- specimens. 1. Microcysrina Rinku, Morch. (Plate III. fig. 1.) Microcystina rinkii, Morch, Journ. Conch. Oct. 1872, p. 311; id. Oct. 1876, p. 356; Nevill, Hand-list, p. 39. no. 171. Locality. Island of Teressa, one of the Nicobars. Shell closely umbilicate, subglobosely conoid, polished above ; sculpture, very fine, regular disposed, and parallel longitudinal striz, 26=-01 inch (fig. 1a); colour rich sienna above, below covered with a dull white deposit ; spire subconoid, sides flat, apex blunt ; suture shallow; whorls 5, the last well rounded ; aperture oblique, symmetrically lunate, the body-whorl covered with a distinct callus ; peristome thin, columellar margin (fig. 2) oblique, much thickened, reflected and very sinuate, the reflected portion ending abruptly at right angles to the base of the last whorl. Size: major diam. 0°21 inch., alt. axis 0°10 inch. - 54 mm., 35 | 2G im. For the animal of this species I am indebted to Mr. G. Nevill, to whom I owe many thanks for this and other rarities. Original description (J. c. p. 811) :—** 7. anguste umbilicata, con- vevo-depressa, tenuis, polita, nitidissima, brunnea, umbilicum versus pallidior ; strie incrementi obsoletissimee, remotissime ; spira parum elevata, obtuse convexa ; sutura obsolete appresso-marginata ; anfr. 4, vie convexi, angusti, ultimus subdepresso-rotundatus ; apertura obli- qua, lunata, margine columellari (vel labro) dilatato, reflexo, profunde sinuato, fere emarginato, umbilicum propendente. “ Diam. maj. fere 5 mill., axis 23 mill. ‘‘ Hab. Sambelong, bords de la rivicre Galathea: trois exem- plaires. “ Obs. Nanina (Microcystis) mitiuscula, vy. Martens (Reise, p. 75, t. xii. f. 10) quoad formam.” L.c. p. 356: “ Habitat Sambelong (Reinhardt); Petite Nicobar (Busch, 1845); Kamorta, Teressa, Katchal (Jtoepstorf).” * This genus I hope to describe and figure in the next Part. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 13 MicrocysTINA MOERCHIANA, n. sp. (Nevill, MS.). (Plate III. fig. 9, x 4.) Locality. Kondul Island, Bay of Bengal. Shell subdepressly conoid, very polished ; sculpture (fig. 9a, x 50), very microscopic longitudinal fine striation, 832 =-01 inch; colour reddish brown ; spire flatly conoid; suture shallow ; whorls 5, regu- larly increasing ; aperture subovately lunate, subvertical ; peristome thin, reflected at the umbilicus, solid and quite perpendicular at junction with body-whorl. Size: major diam. 0°32 inch, alt. axis 0°15 inch. ra 8-2 mm., pe ders ele ica Animal not known. MicRocysTINA WARNEFORDI, n. sp. (Nevill, MS.). (Plate III. fie S507.) Microcystina warnefordi, Nevill’s Hand-list, Dec. 1878, no. 168, = Nanina (Microcystis), n. sp., but not named. Locality. Andamans. Shell subdepressly conoid, narrowly umbilicate, glassy ; sculpture (fig. 8a, x50), very fine regular microscopic longitudinal striz ; colour umber-brown ; spire low; suture shallow, adpressed ; whorls nearly 5, the last rounded on periphery ; aperture lunate; peristome thin, columellar margin oblique, very slightly reflected, solid and angulate. Size: major diam. 0°28 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. A 4-6 mm., 3 20) mim: Animal not known. MicrocystINA HARRIETENSIS, n. sp. (Nevill, MS.). (Plate III. fics i, 3 jaw, x 50. —— ——: teeth of the radula, central, median, and lateral, x 1210. : ditto, ditto, X 360. warnefordi, n. sp., X 7. : sculpture, X 50. moerchiana, n. sp., X 4. a : sculpture, X x 50. 10. cryptomphalus, n. sp., X 7. 104. ——: sculpture, X 50. 106, —— : columellar margin, x 20. ie harrietensis, n. sp., X 8. lla. : sculpture, X 50. oR ftom ey ————— a. DO DANSD On the Land-Molluscan Genus Cryptosoma, and Description of the Animal of Cryptosoma prestans, Gould. (Plate IV.) The genus Cryptosoma was created in 1857 by Mr. W. Theobald, of the Indian Geological Survey, for a shell common at Moulmain, named Vitrina prestans by Gould. Mr. Theobald’s original descrip- tion in the J. A. S. Bengal, no. iv. p. 252, is very brief, and runs thus :—‘ Testa vitrine simile, sed robustiore. Peristomate obtuso haud tenui. Animale penitus intra testam retractile, et, in cestivationis tem- pore, solido epiphragmate obtecto. “C. prestans (Vitrina prestans), Gould. Maulmain, Martaban, Tenasserim valley. 1 have separated this shell from Vitrina, as the animal is perfectly retractile, and the peristome is thicker than in Vitrina proper, and not membranous. It is common in holes in laterite at Martaban, and not rare throughout the Tenasserim valley. Its colour is a bay-olive Cajiput green.” The genus was therefore founded partly on the characters of the animal, and is therefore far better than the meagre shell-characters on which so many genera have been created. It is curious the truncate form of the foot with the mucous pore was not also men- tioned, which is the principal outward character that distinguishes it from Vitrina with its long pointed foot. I had long wished to get a specimen of the animal of this species, its shell being peculiar, MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 15 so unlike the other species of Helicarion, with which it has been classed by other conchologists since; even Mr. Theobald himself, in his ‘Catalogue of the Land and Freshwater Shells of British India,’ puts it in his section E of Helicarion. H. ovatus, H. Blanford, and succineus, Reeve, are also included in this section, but on no tangible grounds. Geoffrey Nevill, in his “ List of the Mollusca brought back by Dr. J. Anderson from Yunnan and Upper Burmah,” J. A. 8. Bengal, part 2, 1877, p. 25, recognizes the genus Cryptosoma with these remarks :— ‘The entire shell is covered with a thick and compact epidermis ; the largest specimen in the Museum (Calcutta), from Tenasserim, measures, axis 27}, diam. 313 mil. It is an extremely abundant species in Tenasserim and also near Moulmein; Dr. Anderson found it abundant at Sawady and on the banks of the Irrawady, Second Defile.” The shell, with animal, was also figured in Dr. Anderson’s work from a drawing made, under Dr. Ferd. Stoliczka’s superinten- dence, by a native artist, and which I give a copy from the same original excellent drawing (Plate IV. fig. 1). Vitrina prestans, from Tavoy (Gould), P. Bost. Soc. N. H. vol. i. p. 140, read Sept. 6 (1843). Vitrina prestans, Gould, Boston J. Nat. Hist. vol. iv. p. 456, plate 24. f. 2, read Sept. 6 (1843); Pfeif. Mon. Helic. vol. ii. p. 497 (1848); Reeve, Conch. Icon. Vitrina, f. 12 (May 1862); Theobald and Hanley, Conchologia Indica, plate Ixv. figs. 5, 6 (1870), with re- mark “our fig. 6 is scarcely round enough.” Cryptosoma preestans, Maulmain, Martaban, and Tenasserim valley (W. Theobald), J. A. 8. B. p. 252 (1857). Helicarion (Section E) prestans, Theobald, Cat. Land and Fresh- water Shells of British India (1876). Helicarion (Cryptosoma) prestans, Nevill, J. A. 8. B. part ii. p. 25 USL). Helicarion prestans, G. Nevill, Hand-list of Mollusca in Ind. Mus., Calcutta (1878). Original description :—“ Testa depressa, fragili, nitida, straminea ; anfr. tribus, striis incremente, et volventibus retrculatis ; apertura sub- coarctata.” The colour is dark straw-colour or amber-colour, inclining to green. A thin layer of enamel unites the two extremities of the lip. The figure given is very good. In response to a wish I expressed in a paper in the Linnean Society last year, Mr. Theobald most kindly sent me quite lately a couple of specimens, preserved in glycerine, of this species from Maulmain. I am now able to give a somewhat more detailed account of its forms and anatomy, which gives it a more substantial position as a subgenus by itself, and which must, with our present know- ledge, be recognized. Animal (Plate IV. fig. 2). With tentacles rather short and blunt, the extremity of foot truncate, the mucous pore large, but with no 16 LAND AND FRESHWATER overhanging lobe, the pedal line very distinct and segmented, termi- nating at the upper margin of the mucous gland, the foot with a broad pedal margin, segmented (fig. 6). .Mantle—the right shell-lobe is moderately large and extends over the region of the body-whorl (Plate IV. fig. 2); it extends quite round to the posterior margin (figs. 4, 5), and unites with the left shell-lobe, which is very long and well developed (fig. 3), and spreads over the edge of the peristome from near the respiratory orifice. The right dorsal lobe is triangular in shape, and the left dorsal lobe is long and rather narrower than the shell-lobe adjacent. The genital organs in one specimen were very small and undeveloped, and were not very well developed in the second specimen ; they show the presence of a thick bluntly cylindrical amatory organ (dart-sac) (fig. 9, D). The penis is much convoluted, and is closely folded together, having a cxecum-like pro- cess (kalk-sac) (fig. 10, c.c.) midway between the vas deferens and the retractor muscle, exactly as in H. bicarinatus, Semper, and H. ceratodes, Pfr., from Luzon, but which have no amatory organ. The ovo-testis, hermaphrodite duct, &c. were not made out. Helicarion cuming? is also somewhat similar, and possesses this organ. Odontophore (P1. LY. fig. 12). The buccal mass is large, the radula is nearly as broad as long, with a very large number of teeth in each row. The ribbon was delicate, and was broken in taking it out; but 88 rows were counted in one specimen and 97 in the second: we may take 100 as the probable number. The dental formula is 120 (2+7) .1.(7+2) 120, ye | Thel05 1h Aellsia). The central tooth is broad, large, bluntly pointed, with two small basal cusps on either side, on a broad oblong base. The next median eight are large, broad, and sharp-pointed, but decreasing in breadth outwards ; each has one short basal cusp on the outer margin. Each median has a smali notch on the inner margin, its position halfway between the apex and the outer cusp. In No. 8 it is still nearer and is less developed. In No. 9 it is hardly to be seen; the tooth is narrower, while the outer basal cusp has advanced its position close up to the point, and No. 10 is changed completely into a long, narrow, bicuspid lateral. More than one hundred such teeth suc- ceed, all of the same size and shape; then the points become blunter (fig. 12 a), with only an indication of the bicuspid form, and finally the last have a single, blunt, rather square point (fig. 124), and the outermost diminish much in size and are short and pointed. This radula is therefore very peculiar, assimilating to that of Macrochlamys on one side in the general character of the well-developed median teeth, but differing widely in the very great number of the laterals, the formula of Macrochlamys being 40 to 50.12.1.12.40 to 50, Of Do els Do. The jaw is strong, straight in front, and longitudinally striate, thus differing again from Macrochlamys and its allies (Girasia, Austenia, MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. W7/ &e.), Which have a central convex projection on the frontal edge. In the great number of teeth it recalls the genus Durgella, which also has a straight jaw. The odontophore is very similar to Helicarion ceratodes, Pfr., from Luzon, given by Dr. C. Semper in Reis. Archipel Philippinen, pl. vi. fig. 24; and the animal on plate i. fig. 12 is also very like, but does not show the form of the right shell-lobe. EXPLANATION OF PLATE IV. Animal of Cryptosoma prestans, from nature, nat. size. Copied from an original drawing made by native artist, under the super- intendence of the late Dr. F. Stoliczka. . Animal (enlarged), from spirit-specimen, viewed from right side. Shell removed, showing the mantle and its lobes. . Ditto, left side. . Ditto, posterior side, viewed from above, showing the junction of the shell-lobes. . Ditto, side view. . Anterior portion, underside of foot, showing the segmented pallial margin. . Side view of extremity of foot. . Generative organs. . Ditto, second specimen. . Male organ, showing the cxcum or kalk-sac, . daw, X 20. . Teeth of lingual ribbon, x 360. 12a. Laterals, about the 100th from central tooth. 126. Outermost laterals. LAND AND FRESHWATER MOLLUSCA OF P terk NA rk Erlich Ne Part II._JULY 1882. Family ZONITIDA. Subgenus Kartenra (continued). (Plate V.) KALIELLA BARRAKPORENSIS, Pfr. Additional synonymy :—Cat. Pulm. B.M. p. 80 (Wanina) ; Reeve, Conch. Icon. n. 816, t. 132. Since the publication of Part I. I am enabled to give a description of the lingual ribbon of this species. The dried-up animal, a mere speck, still remained in a specimen from Barisal (Part I. p. 3). By soaking this in glycerine for some days, I was rewarded by finding the lingual ribbon, and getting the greater part of it out (vide Plate V. fig. 11). This confirms Stoiiczka’s remarks on the differ- ence of its dentition as compared with Sitala, Adams, when describing that genus under the title Conulema. ‘The dental formula is The central tooth is tricuspid on an oblong base; the central cusp very long, narrow, and sharp-pointed, the lateral cusps about half as long, also lengthened and sharp. ‘The next seven median teeth are similar in form, with the basal cusps having a tendency to turn outwards. The central point is rather shorter in 6 and 7, which last is broader than any of the other median teeth. At the eighth the form quite changes into a narrow, elongate, curved, still tricuspid 02 20 LAND AND FRESHWATER tooth, the inner cusp being slightly longer than the median, and that again than the outer. The laterals decrease rapidly in size to the outermost, which are small, short, and tricuspid (fig. 11 a). Benson was the first to discover this shell. He notes finding it at Patharghata in September, and also at Berhampur (J. A. S. B. 1836, p. 357). In continuation of what has been recorded of this species (pp. 2, 3, 4), I may mention that I have seen the two examples in the British Museum, marked from India only, the types described by Pfeiffer out of the Cuming collection. They have all the appear- ance of specimens from Mussoorie. In the same collection are a number sent from that part of India by Captain T. Hutton, who distributed this shell to several collectors about the same time. They are of the sienna-brown colour which is characteristic of the N.W. Himalayan form (sivalensis). Benson, in the Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., May 1863, records that this species was obtained by Mr. F. Layard at Kandookerre, in Lower Ourah, Ceylon. I have not seen any myself from that part of India. The most interesting and remarkable fact in distribution is the occurrence of the genus Aaliella in Madagascar. My attention has been only lately drawn to this by Mr. Edgar Smith, of the British Museum, who obtained the specimens from Mr. W. Johnson, who collected them at a place ‘in the outskirts of the upper forest, 28 miles east of Antananarivo,” the capital of the island. Mr. Edgar Smith has kindly sent me a specimen, and having compared it side by side with species from different parts of India, I found it agreed very closely with the Nilgiri variety in Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection which I named sigurensis. From the N.W. and East-Himalayan forms it differs in the columellar margin being less oblique, and the peristome more rounded below, giving a larger aperture. It measures in major diam. 3:6, alt. axis 2°9 millim. The Madagascan Kaliella can therefore stand as K. siqurensis, or as K, barrakporensis, var, sigurensis, or simply var. No two naturalists are agreed as to where a variety ends and a species begins ; in fact there is no defined line; I prefer, however, when there is.a decided change of form in some character or another, and constant over a separate area, to distinguish such forms bya name. It is this gradual change which is so interesting when studying and following out any group over a wide extent of country. Mr. Johnson says, ‘‘ It was not in or near any garden or human habitation, nor could any introduced plants have got there.” He found them “on the ground, among bracken fern, in a scrap of forest. A fire had passed over the place a year(?) previously, and these shells were hidden among the light black earth and leaves, on high ground, above a cliff or brow of rock, below which was thick forest.” The shells were very scarce, he ‘could only find a few specimens, except blanched ones.” This account certainly supports the view that the shell has not been introduced ; and we may con- sider it one of the several forms that formerly had a far more ex- MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 21 tensive and similar range from this island towards India on the north-east. The paucity of these genera and species, however, points to a very distant and not a very close and continuous connexion. KaLigtLa FASTIaIATA, Hutton. (Plate II. fig. 8.) Additional synonymy :—Wiegm. Arch. (1839) ii. p. 222; Reeve, n. 823, t. 133; Pfr. Mon. Hel. i. p. 37. no. 57, and iii. p. 41. no. 85; Chem. ed. Kiister, Helix, n. 919, t. 141. figs. 15, 16; Mon. Suppl. p- 40; Cat. Pulm. B. M. p. 75 (as Nanina). T next figure, on Plate V., a group of minute shells, of which the animal has never been examined, nor have I any notes of my own regarding them. The sculpture is similar to species already figured, viz. fine transverse ribbing ; they are conoid or globosely conoid in form, and rounded or subangular on the periphery, instead of being sharply keeled, and the whorls are more convex. Of this subgroup Helix nana, Hutton, may be taken as the type. I hesitate, at pre- sent, to give the group any distinctive title, and shall bring them in under Kaliella, to which, I think, they will be found to be nearest related ; and should this prove to be the case, it will be better to slightly amend the characters of the above genus as originally de- scribed by Mr. W. T. Blanford, than to create a new subgenus. I hope to receive specimens in spirit from the N.W. Himalaya of nana and bullula, which will clear up the question whether they are or are not allied to K. barrakporensis. KaLIeLia NANA, Hutton. (Plate V. figs. 6, 6a.) Helix nana, J. A. 8. B. March 1888, vol. vii. p. 218; Conch. Indica, Pals. plo ix. tes. 7, O, o- Sitala nana, Theob. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Microcystis) nana, Nevill’s Hand-list, p. 38. no. 164; Cat. Pulm. Brit. Mus. p. 74 (1855). Orobia nana, Die Heliceen (ed. von Martens), p. 58 (1860). Original description :— Testa parvula, convewo-conoidea, pallide fucescente ; anfractibus sex wut septem arcte convolutis, ultimo rotun- dato ; apertura latiore, labro simplict ; wmbilico evanido ; apice valde obtuso. “Diam. 0°1. ‘Animal Heliciform, colour dark grey. Accompanies the two last species (fastigiata and bullula), and occurs in the greatest abundance.” (B.) Range. Simla, Mussoorie (Dr. 7. Oldham and Stoliczka). Dar- jeeling (Stoliczka and Col. Mainwaring): I have never seen this shell, which may not be the same'species. Moisraka, Midnapur district (G. Nevill), and Botanical Gardens, Calcutta (Stoliczka); Port Canning (Wood Mason): regarding these three Lower Bengal localities, there is, I think, some doubt as to the correct identifica- tion of the shells. Locality. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya (@.-A.): figured. Shell very globosely conoid, rounded on the base ; sculpture very 22 LAND AND FRESHWATER fine, regular, sharply defined transverse ribbing, quite smooth to the eye; colour pale ochraceous; spire conoid, sides convex ; apex blunt; suture well impressed; whorls 6, sides convex ; aperture lunate ; peristome thin, oblique on columellar margin. Size: major diam. 0°12 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. a 30 mm., as 2:0 mm. KALiIkELLA RESINULA, n. sp. (Plate V. fig. 8.) Locality. Khasi Hills (G.-A.). Shell globosely conoid, very closely umbilicate, rounded below ; sculpture beautifully fine close costulation ; colour pale ochraceous ; spire high, sides much convex ; suture impressed ; whorls 6, convex, regularly increasing ; aperture semilunate ; peristome thin. Size: major diam. 0°09 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. a3 2-4 mm., » 20-mm. KALIELLA RESINULA, juv. (Plate V. fig. 7.) Locality. Teria Ghat (G.-A.). Shell globosely conoid, very closely umbilicate, rounded below ; sculpture very fine transverse costulation ; colour pale horny ; spire moderately high, sides convex; suture impressed ; whorls 5, convex, regularly increasing; aperture semilunate, nearly vertical ; peri- stome perpendicular near axis. Size: major diam. 0°08 inch, alt. axis 0:06 inch. a 2:0 mm., " 1-6 mm, Katretia stxximensis, Nevill, MS. (Plate V. fig. 9.) Locality. Sikkim, ex Indian Museum, Calcutta. Shell ovately conoid, rounded below, closely umbilicated ; sculp- ture extremely fine, close, regular costulation ; colour pale sienna- brown ; spire blunt and rounded ; suture impressed ; whorls 6, sides convex ; aperture semicircular; peristome sharply reflected near the umbilicus. Size: major diam. 0-095 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. a 2:3 mm., | 2-0 arm. This is very close to the Khasi shell resinula, but is not so tumid. KALIELLA LHOTAENSIS, n. sp. (Plate V. figs. 2, 2a.) Locality. Lhota Naga (A. Chennell). Shell globosely conoid, not umbilicated, subangular on last whorl, base rounded ; sculpture delicate, regular, fine transverse ribbing, quite smooth below ; colour pale sienna-brown ; spire conoid, sides convex ; suture shallow; whorls 5, regularly increasing ; aperture oblique, ovately lunate, small; peristome moderately thickened ; columellar strong, perpendicular. Size: major diam. 0:09 inch, alt. axis 0-06 inch. om 2°3 mm., as 1-6 mm. This shell is at first sight very like animula from the Khasi Hills, but its small semicircular aperture is very different from the larger open one of that shell. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 93 KALrELLA FLATURA, n.sp. (Plate V. figs. 10, 10a.) Locality. Munipur (G.-A.). Shell globosely conoid ; sculpture regular, well-marked, transverse ribbing, not apparent to the eye; colour horny brown; spire high- conoid, sides slightly convex ; suture impressed ; whorls 5, sides convex ; aperture ovate, vertical; peristome thin, a good deal re- flected and perpendicular on columellar margin. Size; major diam. 0-09 inch, alt. axis 0-06 inch. By 2°3 mm., . 1:5 mm. Near lhotaensis, but more globose, whorls more convex, blunter apex and coarser ribbing. KALierLa ANmmuLA, 0. sp. (Plate V. fig. 1.) Locality. Khasi Hills (G.-A.). Shell pyramidal, somewhat rounded below, angular on periphery ; sculpture oblique, irregular ridges of growth, with very minute transverse ribbing; colour pale horny; spire conoid, sides flat; suture moderately impressed; whorls 5, sides convex; aperture broadly ovate, subvertical ; peristome thin; columellar margin but slightly reflected and very upright. Size; major diam. 0-1 inch, alt. axis ‘075 inch. 3 2°6 mm., i 1:9 mm. KatieqLxia BULLULA, Hutton. (Plate V. fig. 4.) Helix bullula, J. A. 8. B. March 1838, p. 218; Reeve, n. 819, t. 133; Conch. Ind. p. 28, pl. 1x1. figs. 2, 3. Sitala bullula, Theob. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Microcystis) bullula, Nevill, Hand-list, p. 37. no. 155: Naini Tal, Simla, Kulu, and Mussoorie (Stoliczka). Nanina bullula, Cat. Pulm. Brit. Mus. p. 88 (1855). Orobia bullula, Die Heliceen, ed. von Martens, p. 58. Original description :—“ Testa parvula, glabra, translucente, sub- trochiformi, conoidea; anfractibus quinque convexis, ultimo rotun- dato ; suturis impressis ; wmbilico angustato ; apertura latiore ; labro simplicr. “ Diam. 0°15 inch (B.). * Found with H. fastigiata among dead leaves at Simla. This shell is much larger than nana, with which it has been mistaken.” Locality. North side of the Nag-Tiba range, near Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya (specimen figured). Shell bluntly conoid ; sculpture fine, regular, transverse ribbing, with no longitudinal furrows, as in rimicola; colour pale whitish horny ; whorls 5, sides convex, somewhat subangulate on the peri- phery, the last somewhat descending; columellar margin sub- oblique. Size: major diam. 4:0 mm., alt. axis 3-0 mm. ‘, 0:16 inch, ,, 0-12 inch. In Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection there are three examples of 24 LAND AND FRESHWATER this species from Kumaon, which only differ in being smaller than those from Mussoorie (vide Plate V. fig. 5). Major diam. 3°5; alt. axis 2:1 mm. EXPLANATION OF PLATE V. Fig. 1. Kaliella animula, n. sp., X 7. Khasi Hills. 2. lhotaensis, n. sp., X 7. Lhota-Naga Hills. 2a, —— : sculpture, x 50. 3. —— barrakporensis, Pfr., x 7. Madagascar. 4, —— bullula, Hutton, x 7. North side Nag-Tiba range. 5: , X 7, small var. Kumaon, N.W. Himalaya. 6, 6a. nana, Hutton, X 7. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya. 7. Kaliella resinula, juy.,u.sp., X 7. Teria Ghat, Khasi Hills. 8. resinula, n. sp., X 7. Khasi Hills. 9. sikkimensis, Nev. MS., * 7. Sikkim. 10, 10a. jlatura, nu. sp., X 7. Munipur. 11. Teeth of the radula of Kaliella barrakporensis, Pfr., from a speci- men from Barisal, Lower Bengal: central and twelve laterals. lla. Outermost laterals, x 1250. The characters of the subgenus Kaliella have never been drawn up. They are indicated below, with a synoptical list of the species I would include in it. Character. Name. Locality. A. Shell trochiform or pyramidal, with sides flat, well keeled on periphery ; base flat, with trans- verse or oblique very fine costu- lation; subperforate. Animal with a mucous pore. Anatomy similar to the genus Sitala. Odontophore, central teeth ob- long, sharp-pointed, with tri- ee [eratreensis | ing. Haare , Var. siva- { Mussoorie and N.W. a, Major diameter > than height : LENSIS’ “s.0Su2ces Himalaya. Dep) Gasdeonssack cocasdoou dened vaca & Windean! perakensis ...... Malay Peninsula. VULCAN seovevees Burmah. { ! SUGUTENSIS ve... Nilghiris. a’, Spire = or > major diam.... Bh eae Madagascar. Cherraensis ....0. Khasi Hills. WEN aUemloecese Lower Bengal. , A P costulata ......64. Dafla Hills, Assam. a”. Strong distant costulation { subcostulata ...... N. Khasi Hills, munipurensis ... Munipur. 6. Spire high, sides convex, sub- svar! DO: Naga Hills. angulate on periphery ......... ASPUTANS ..s.0.00- Nilghiris. Khasiaea 11.0106 Khasi Hills. B'. Spire higher” 4.0.0.9)... { fastigiata......... N.W. Himalaya. ae a elongata weve. Khasi Hills. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 25 Synoptical List (continued). Character. Name. Locality. JUINELACE ...0eee0ees 8. Jaintia Hills. ; NAGAENSIS . 02+ 0ee0000s Naga Hills. c. Base tumid below.......-..++++++. grata ae Ditto. LOTIGCNSUS. ..ceesenees Khasi Hills. B. Shell globosely conoid ; sides convex; aperture small, subper- forate ; close fine transverse cos- tulation. OMG maces seitaaieets N.W. Himalaya. TESINUWID ..-.0--000e- Khasi Hills. d. Rounded on last whorl ......... 4 sikkimensis........+. BK. Himalaya. OTE sognoncaGoo8e0e N.W. Himalaya. UOLCRUT, Cae aeteeeteeieateel= Munipur. : Thotaensts ...000++- Lhota-Naga Hills. e’, Subangulate on periphery «+ gnimuda ....ccsvere: Khasi Hills. Genus SITALA. Sitala, H. Adams, P. Z.S. April 1865, p. 408. . In a paper entitled “ List of the Land Shells collected by Mr. Wallace in the Malay Archipelago, with Descriptions of the new Species by Mr. Henry Adams,” under Trochomorpha tropidophora, Ad. & Reeve, from Borneo, is the following note :— “From the observations of Mr. W. T. Blanford, the animal of T. lychnia is without a mucous pore at the extremity of the foot ; and Trochomorpha therefore must be removed from the family Stenopide. The species infula, Bens., however, hitherto included in Trochomorpha, is, according to Mr. Blanford, furnished with one, and must remain in that family, where it may be considered the type of a group, under the name of Sitala.”—/. Ad. The genus was therefore, under this title, never thoroughly de- scribed ; but it is sufficiently well indicated, and it was very neces- sary to remove infula from the subgenus Trochomorpha, in which Albers had originally placed it. Ferd. Stoliczka, in ignorance of the very brief note by Adams*, described this genus most thoroughly and accurately under the name of Conulema, in that very elaborate and excellent paper on “ Terres- trial Mollusca from the Neighbourhood of Moulmein,” in the Journ. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1871, p. 236, taking attegia, Bs., for his type, and including culmen, Blf., infula, cacuminifera, are, and pal- maria, Benson, H. gratulator and confinis, Blf., liricincta, Stol., pro- pably WV. apicata and H. hyphasma, Pfr., from South India and Ceylon, H. leucophlea, Martens, from Celebes, and a few others. Stolicaka says also, “ The genus is, as regards form and structure of the shell, closely allied to Semper’s Martensia (a name already em- ployed in botany) (Reisen im Archipel der Phil. &c., Theil 2, Band iv. p- 42); but in this the light shell-lobe of the mantle is said to be * And he acknowledges this when describing St¢ala carinifera, in J. A. S. B. 1873, p. 16, saying Conulema must now be regarded as identical with Sitala. 26 LAND AND FRESHWATER entirely absent, and the penis has two cxcal appendages, which have not been observed in Conulema.” I give Stoliczka’s descrip- tion in full :— “Shell conoidal, thin, consisting of many, usually spirally ribbed or striated whorls; base convex, narrowly or indistinctly umbili- cated ; margin of the aperture thin, not expanded, outer simple. “ Animal narrow, long, generally equal to twice the greater dia- meter of the shell; pedicles long, tentacles much shorter, lateral line distinct, the margin below it smooth; gland at the end of foot large, superseded by a distinct horn; sole grooved ; two shell and two dorsal lobes to the mantle, all of them small and with no separately produced appendages, but slightly extended on either end; genital organs with or without an amatorial gland; a single appendage to the penis, produced into the penis retractor, recepta- culum seminis terminating with a bulging end, attached to the anterior portion of the prostata. Jaw thin, transparent, smooth, indistinctly or finely concentrically striated in the middle. Radula large, consisting of numerous (about 100) transverse rows, each with very numerous (300 to above 400) teeth, a few median teeth being conspicuously larger than the laterals, which are narrow, pectiniform, and very gradually decreasing in width.” Srrata InFuLA, Bs. (Plate VIII. fig. 1.) Helix infula, Benson, Ann. & Mag. N. H. Sept. 1848, p. 160, changed from H. tubiniformis, J. A. 8. B., type described from Mur- shedabad and Patharghata, Behar; Reeve, Conch. Icon. Helix, f. 783; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. iii. p. 58; Conch. Ind. pl. liv. fig. 9; Chem. ed. ii., Helix, n. 804, t. 127. f. 24, 25; Mon. Suppl. p. 58. Trochomorpha infula, Albers, Die Heliceen, 2nd edit. von Martens (1860), p. 61; W. T. Blanford, Ann. & Mag. N. H., Feb. 1863. Nanina infula, J. E. Gray, Cat. Pulm. B. M. p. 80 (1855). Sitala infula, Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Sitala) infula, Nev. Hand-list, 1878, p. 83,=culmen, Ble. Original description :—‘ Testa subperforata, globoso-conica, sub- trochiformi, albido-cornea, pellucida, supra minime nitente, liners distantibus parum elevatis cincta, subtus subnitente, radiato-striata, striis remotiusculis concentricis ornata [ Pl. VIII. figs. 1a,16]; spira subconica, apice obtuso ; anfractibus sex convexiusculis, ultimo angu- lato, infra conveaxiusculo ; apertura subquadrato-lunata, peristomate acuto, margine columellart verticali, prope perforationem subreflexo. “ Diam. maj. 7 mill., axis 5 mill. “« Hab. prope urbem Murshedabad Bengalis, necnon prope collem Patharghata, provincize Behar. ‘Formerly indicated as H. turbiniformis, mihi, in the ‘ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Calcutta.’ This name being used by Pfeiffer for another species, I have altered it for one of nearly similar signi- fication. H.infula occurred to me in 18385 on the leaves of trees and shrubs at the two places above noted. The animal has a caudal protuberance like Nanina, but no expansion of the mantle, and is MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. Bl whitish, spotted with brown, which, appearing through the trans- lucent shell, gives the species a beautiful appearance when newly captured. At first sight it appeared as if the colours resided in the shell.” Specimen figured ex. coll. W. T. Blanford, from Calcutta. Major diam. 8-0, alt. axis 5°5 mm. The largest specimen I have seen in same collection, from Tal- chir, measures—major diam. 8°5, alt. axis 7-0 mm., showing how these local races or varieties differ. On a close examination of four Calcutta specimens, seven distinct spiral ribs, crossed by fine transverse oblique costulation, were counted, the ribs being less distinct on the last whorl. In the two specimens from Talchir this spiral sulcation is much wider apart, and only five could be counted on each whorl. Stoliczka (1. c. p. 239) thus describes S. infula in detail; and I have copied the animal with its anatomy, and that of S. attegia given on plate xviil., which illustrates his paper :— “* The animal of this species [ Pl. VIII. fig. 1 ¢] is identical in form and coloration with that of attegia, except that there is often a little more leaden grey on the upper posterior part of the foot, tinging the sole. The general organization is also the same in both, with the only difference that in the genital organs the amatorial sacis entirely absent. The end of the seminal receptacle is attached by a fine thread to the anterior part of the prostata, and the albu- minous gland of the uterus is comparatively larger than in attegia. In specimens which I examined in winter, the oviduct was ante- riorly only slightly enlarged ; but all the larger specimens examined during the rainy season showed a very conspicuous orange-coloured swelling in that place [ Pl. VIII. fig. 1g]. The ova composing it were in an advanced state of development, and some of them showed already a spiral arrangement of dark corpuscles. “The jaw (fig. 1d] exhibits a rather distinct but very fine concen- tric striation ; the median projection in the anterior concavity is very slight, and the convex edge is partially soft, granular, not entirely horny. «The radula [fig. le] is large, composed of about 100 nearly straight transverse rows, each generally consisting of from 307 to 321 teeth, the seven median teeth being conspicuously larger than those following on either side, the formula being 150+3.1.3+4150 153.1. 153 and the total number of teeth is somewhat above 30,000. ‘«‘ The anatomy of the present species [ fig. 1f ], when compared with that of the last (wttegia), agrees, as already stated, almost perfectly. There is aslight difference in the terminal attachment of the seminal receptacle and in the number of enlarged teeth, but the only essential distinction lies in the absence of an amatorial sac in infula. I was at first inclined to attribute the absence of that 28 LAND AND FRESHWATER organ to immaturity ; but this view was not supported by the exa- mination of specimens at all seasons of the year, and some which had fully-developed ova. The only conclusion I ean arrive at is that the presence or absence of an amatorial sac cannot be consi- dered as a character of generic importance ; for it would be simply dragging classification into absurdity if we would refer infula and attegza to two genera, while almost every other point of organization, the form and colour of the animals and of the shells are nearly perfectly the same.’ I can bear out Stoliezka in these remarks ; for when examining two species of the genus Durgella, which is closely allied to Sitala, and which I deserted in the Linnean Society’s ‘Journal,’ vol. xv. 1881, p. 291, I pointed out that the Tenasserim form D. levicula possesses an amatory organ, while in D. assamica it was absent, yet in every other character there was similarity between them ; and I subsequently found that a third species (D. christiane from the An- damans) was also deficient of this organ, still preserving the main characters of the genus Durgella. “ C. infula is a common species in the neighbourhood of Calcutta; it occurs sparingly in Western Bengal, and northwards up to the foot of the hills, and is also found near Poona and Balarampir in Southern India. In none of these localities do the specimens attain the size of the Burmese attegia ; and when compared with ordinary specimens of the latter, the spiral angle is generally found to be smaller, the whorls slightly more convex, and the base of the last less inflated. However, these characters are all somewhat variable ; and I collected specimens of attegia at Moulmain which are almost un- distinguishable from the Bengal infula, the only difference being that the former are clearly immature, while the latter, of the same size, have all the appearance of full-grown shells.” The above com- parative description of the two forms (the italics are mine) is clearly shown in the figures I give of them, and to this can be added the difference in their sculpture. Nevill, in his ‘ Hand-list,’ records twenty specimens of infula from Moulmain, ex coll. Stoliczka ; these are probably the immature specimens of attegia referred to above : he, at the same time, records S. culmen, Blf., as a synonymn of infula, while, as I shall show further on, Stoliczka considered culmen to be the young of attegia, which, if it is not distinct, is a much more reasonable conclusion. “The following measurements have been taken from specimens of different localities :— Calcutta. Ranigunj. Poona. Number of whorls .... 63 7 53 Larger diameter...... 7°0 mm. 7-5 mm. 5°5 mm. Snialler 6+ Pa eee CS 5; COre3 Oo re Height of shell ...... POLS 3 US aha, Spiral angle ........ (ex 74° 78° “I have not seen, from any part of Bengal, specimens larger than MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 29 8 mm. in the greater diameter, and those from the Western Ghats appear rarely to attain more than 6 mm. in the same diameter. The spiral angle varies in the Bengal specimens from 65°-78°; on the average it is decidedly smaller than in atlegia, and may be taken at 74°.” The great difference in the proportion of diameter to height between the Western Ghats form and the two other localities, in the first the two measurements being equal, denotes a very consi- derable modification of form, which may constitute, if constant, a very good variety. In ‘Contributions to Indian Malacology,’? No. IL., by Messrs. Blanford, they say “ This shell is tolerably abundant on Banyan trees (Micus indica) in the Botanical Gardens, Calcutta. We have also met with it in Orissa.” Srrata atreera, Bs. (Plate VIII. fig. 2.) Helix attegia, Ann. & Mag. N. H. 1859, iii. p. 184; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 91; Novit. pl. 78. f. 17, 18, 19; Conch. Ind. pl. kxxxv. f. 7, p. 36 (form of shell well given). Sitala attegia, Th. Suppl. Cat. p. 20,=culinen, W. BIE. Janina (Sitala) attegia, Nev. Hand-list, p. 33. Conulema attegia, Stoliczka, J. A. 8. B. 1871, p. 237 (type of genus), pl. xvili. f. 1—-4,=culmen, BIE. Trochomorpha attegia, W. T. Blanford, Ann, & Mag. N. H., Feb. 1863. Original description :—‘ Testa anguste perforata, conica, tenui, striatula, liris tenuibus vie elevatis, remotiusculis, spiratibus, striisque minutissimis interpositis decussata [ PL.VILII. fig. 2a], pellucida, cornea ; spira subanguste conica, sutura leviter impressa, apice acuto, patlido ; anfractibus 7 convexiusculis, ultimo filoso-carinato, subtus conveai- usculo ; apertura vie obliqua, rhombeo-lunari, peristomate acuto, recto, margine columellart verticali, superne valde dilatato-refleao, perforationem subtegente. “ Diam. major 8, minor 7, axis 8 mill. “Habitat ad Phie Than, vallis Tenasserim, frequens. “Distinguished from the Cingalese H. hyphasma, Pfr., by its narrower conical form, sculpture, structure of columellar lip, &c.” Locality of specimen figured. Moulmain (Stoliczka). Sculpture. On the upper whorls there are six distinct spiral ridges, the lowest being close to the suture; finer and intermediate ridges come in below, until on the last whorl they are numerous and rather close together, crossed by oblique regular striz. Size: major diam. 10°2 mm., alt. axis 7°56 mm. 5 0-4 A 0-3 inch. Specimen from Prome, Pegu, figured Plate VIII. fig. 3. Size: major diam. 11:0 mm., alt. axis 0°3 mm. This species ranges from Ava (Blanford’s coll.) through Pegu to Moulmain in Tenasserim. 30 LAND AND FRESHWATER Stoliczka (l. c. p. 237) thus describes the animal :— “The animal is of a dull whitish colour ; the larger warts of the body, often possessing a pink tinge, are arranged in oblique rows ; the pedicles are grey, and this colour also extends over a part of the back ; ridge of the posterior part of the foot ashy grey; mantle- lobes light, or sometimes pinkish grey ; inner part of mantle, form- ing the pulmonary sac, with spots and stripes of dark pigment, giving the shell, when the animal is retracted, a spotted appearance. “ The mantle-lobes [Pl. VIII. fig. 2 ¢] are very slightly extensible ; those covering the shell are somewhat thickened near their margins, the left shell-lobe being slightly reflected over the edge of the outer lip, so as to just cover it. The right dorsal lobe is much larger than the left, which is represented by a mere thickened rim. “ The general anatomy of the digestive and nervous organs and of the muscular system is exactly as in Rotula. “ The generative organs [fig. 2 | have a large and long uterus ; the terminal swollen end of the seminal receptacle is imbedded in a soft tissue at the anterior end of the prostata; vas deferens short and extremely thin, widened before it enters the penis, the ex- panded portion being filled with a granular colouring pigment, in which, however, no calcareous particles were discernible. The penis is rather thick, posteriorly prolonged and attached by thin muscles to near the end of the prostata. The amatorial gland [D] is a very strong, tough, twisted tube, enclosing a pointed flagel- “The jaw [fig. 2d] is semicircular, slightly projecting in the centre of the concave edge, smooth, about the median part indis- tinctly and very finely concentrically striated. .... The radula [fig. 2¢] is very large, consisting of about 100, nearly straight or slightly undulating transverse rows. In a full-grown specimen I counted 405 teeth in a row, the formula being 2004+2.1.2+4+200= 202.1. 202 and the total number of teeth about 40,000. ‘‘The four median teeth are conspicuously larger than those fol- lowing on either side; all have a sharp pointed cusp at the anterior end. The centre tooth has besides two smaller cusps at each side and is symmetrical; the following are gradually more and more turned on either the right or left side, and the smaller cusps are therefore developed only on one side; the last lateral tooth is styliform. “The shell of Conulema attegia is subject to a large amount of variation. The original specimen described from Tenasserim was a thin horny shell, and probably not quite mature. Young shells have the periphery always very sharply carinated, and the spiral ribs or striz on the whorls, as well as on the somewhat inflated base, are distinct. Specimens which live on foliage or other kind of vegetation on low land retain the thin horny structure of their shells, even when fullgrown ; hut the spiral striation of the whorls MOLLUSCA OF INDIA, 31 is often difficult to be traced. On drier places and on sandstone hills the shells become more solid, and are covered with a thin horny cuticle; the spiral striation becomes very distinctly dis- cernible, and there often appear intermediate strie between the four or five stronger spiral ribs. A young specimen of this type has been described by Blanford as Nanina culmen. On limestone ground the shells become again more solid, often attaining a con- siderable thickness, and the specimens also grow to a larger size, but the spiral striation occasionally disappears almost entirely on the two last whorls. «This species is common about Moulmain, though not so much on the low land as on limestone hills. ‘The spiral angle of specimens collected in Burmah varies from nearly 70° to 86°. The following table will indicate some of the principal variations :— Pegu. Moulmain, I ON, ae eS Number of whorls.. 6 8 4 6, 7 Larger diameter .. 538 13mm. 7 8 11:2 mm. Height of shell.... 55 12 ,, 6:4 (irae 5 ae Spiral angle ...... 12.4 280: WOsy pp Sar wear Sa ~~ Sees culmen. attegia. attegia.” I have given this long extract from Stoliczka’s interesting remarks on this shell because they show so well how the nature of soil, food, and moisture affects within very small areas the form and sculpture of the shells of these creatures ; it is these slight changes, gradually becoming more permanent, to be extended over larger areas or re- maining restricted, that are regarded as local races, or varieties, or subspecies, whichever the naturalist likes to call them, and which, after all, is quite immaterial to the general result of our ob- servations. What we have to show is, how very unequal these areas are in size, and how they are distributed; and from this we shall find where the boundaries of these changes lie, and thence perhaps be able to connect them with the past and present distri- bution of land and sea, Srrata cutmen, W. Blf. (Plate VIII. fig. 4.) Nanina culmen, Contrib. Ind. Mal., J. A.S.B. 1865, p. 72 (section Trochomorpha). Conulema as =attegia, Bs., Stoliczka, J. A. S. B. 1871, p. 237. Sitala as =attegia, Bs,, Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Sttala) as=infula, Bs., Nev. Hand-l. p. 33. Original description :—*“ Shell very minutely perforated, trochi- form, very thin, horny, translucent. Spire conical, apex obtuse, suture impressed. Whorls 6, convex above, and ornamented with fine raised spiral lines and oblique strive; the last whorl sharply keeled at the periphery, not descending, swollen and minutely de- cussately striated beneath. Aperture but little oblique, subquad- 32 LAND AND FRESHWATER rately lunate; height less than the breadth ; peristome simple, thin; margins distant, columellar vertical, slightly reflected above.” * Major diam. 5°75, minor diam, 5°33, axis 5°5 mm. RA 0°23, : 0-21, ,, 0°22 inch. “ Aperture 3 millim. broad, 2 high. “ Habitat. Akoutoung and banks of the Tsanda Khyoung, Hen- zadah district, Pegu. ‘“‘ Kasily distinguished from N. confinis and NV. attegia by its smaller size and higher spire, from JV. arwv by the sides of the spire being straight and not concave, and from the Bengal JV. infula, Bens., by its sculptrue and its sharper keel.” The shell figured is one of the two typical specimens (No. 65) in Mr. W.T. Blanford’s collection. There are nine distinct spiral ribs, the two lowest close together, and these are in far stronger relief and more marked than in infula, and extend even to the base of the shell. Size: major diam. 4:8 mm., alt. axis 6-3 mm. j Only ich,) ”.,5 0°25 inch. For this form I retain the original specific name, as it seems to be a good and distinct local race, as nearly related by shell-character to attegia as it is to infula. Srrata conrinis, W. BIf. (Plate X. fig. 2.) Nanina confinis, J. A. 8. B. 1865, p. 71 (section T’rochomorpha) ; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 83. Helix confinis, Conch. Ind. p. 64, pl. clix. fig. 8 (not good). Sitala confinis, Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20; Nev. Hand-l. 1878, p. 33. Original description :—“ Shell minutely perforated, trochiform, very thin, whitish horny, smooth, shining. Spire conical, apex slightly obtuse, suture scarcely impressed. Whorls 7, flatly convex, marked above with 4 or 5 spiral ribs and fine oblique lines of growth ; the last sharply keeled, flatly convex beneath, and very finely radiately striated. Aperture oblique, subrhomboidal, twice as broad as high; peristome thin, acute, straight, margins distant, columellar subvertical, briefly and triangularly reflexed. “ Major diam. 10°5, minor diam. 9°5, axis 7-0 mm. Ms 0-42, 95 0°38, ,, 0°28 inch. “ Aperture 5 mm. broad, 2°5 high. “© Habitat. Near Thayet Myo, on the borders of British Burma ; also near Ava. «A near ally of NV. arw, Bens., from Tenasserim, which, however, may easily be recognized by the concave sides of its spire. From other related species (as JV. infula, Bs., N. cacuminifera, Bs., and N. attegia, Bs.) N. confinis is distinguished by its sculpture.” The figure now given is from a specimen in Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection. SITALA GROMATICA, n. sp. (Plate X. figs. 5, 5 a.) Locality. Munipur Hills (G.-A.). Shell pyramidal, sharply keeled, flat on base, scarcely perforate ; MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 33 sculpture, 10 very fine spiral thread-like ribs far apart, with 4 close together at basal side of whorl near suture; colour pale ochraceous umber-brown ; spire conic, sides nearly flat ; suture shallow; whorls 7, sides slightly convex ; aperture semilunate, subyertical ; peristome thin, oblique on columellar margin and searecly reflected. Size: sd diam. 3°4mm., ate axis 2°7 mm. O-l3inech, ..., . .0*klinch. This species ‘is at first sight very like S. haroldi of the Nicobars, but is distinguished by its more convex-sided whorls and higher spire, while it is not 80 flat on the base as harold?, and has a much larger deeper aperture. SITALA GROMATICA, var. (Plate X. figs. 6, 6 a.) Locality. Khasi Hills (G.-A.). Shell pyramidal, keeled, flat on base; sculpture, 12 to 14 distinct fine spiral ribs, crossed diagonally by irregular lines of growth, con- centric ribbing on basal side; colour pale horny ; spire conic, sides flat; suture shallow; whorls 6, slightly convex; aperture semi- lunar, narrow, oblique; peristome thin, perpendicular near axis, but becoming rapidly oblique. Size: major diam. 0°12 inch, alt. axis 0-09 inch. 3°0 mm. eee lis sn cay en This shell only differs from the typical form in the greater number of the fine spiral ribs. Plate X. fig. 8 is a young specimen from the Jatinga valley, North Cachar Hills, which was the first specimen detected in my collection when I began sorting some of the original boxes, and it thus was figured before the others. SrTaLA HAROLDI, n. sp. (Plate X. figs. 7, 7 a.) Locality. Andamans (11 specimens). Shell pyramidal, imperforate ; sculpture, on base distant con- centric ribs in relief, above with 10 longitudinal or spiral white thread-like ribs of equal size and distance apart on each whorl (fig. 7 a); colour pale umber-brown; spire high, sides flat, apex acuminate; suture moderately impressed; whorls 7, sides flatly convex; aperture quadrate, slightly rounded below ; peristome thin, columellar thickened above, straight oblique. Size: major diam. 3°3 mm., alt. axis 2°7 mm. 4 O-LDineh,p/ gy) O71 Linch, This pretty species, remarkable for its very pyramidal form and flat base, was discovered by my brother Mr. Harold Godwin-Austen. I at first thought it must be Heliw (Sagdinella) microtrochus of Morch, described in Journ. Conchyl. Oct. 1876, p. 358, until I re- ceived the type specimen of Sagdinella, which shows the sculpture to be transverse and the shell in every way different from the group Sitala (vide Pl. IX. figs. 1, 1 a)*. * This and the last described are close allies, but the form at once distinguishes the Andaman shell. The range of gromatica no doubt extends along the line of the Arakan Hills, which, there is little doubt, were once continuous with the Andaman Islands. D 34 LAND AND FRESHWATER SITALA PHULONGENSIS, n. sp. (Plate X. fig. 4.) Locality. East of the Kopili river, North Cachar (one specimen) (G.-A.). Shell elongately pyramidal, scarcely perforate; sculpture, 6 to 7 well-raised longitudinal or spiral ribs on the whorls, fine close con- centric ribbing on base ; colour pale sienna-brown; spire high, sides slightly convex, apex blunt; suture well impressed; whorls 53, sides convex; aperture semicircular, oblique; peristome thin, colu- mellar margin vertical, slightly reflected. Size: major diam. 0°10 inch, alt. axis 0-09 inch. a 2:5 mm., i 2°3mm. I have more than twenty of this species, which is distinguished from its near allies by its more elongate form, rounder aperture, and the fewer and stronger liration. J have named it after the trigono- metrical station of Phulong, near which it was first found by me, but it is very common at Cherra Poongee. The shell figured is the single specimen from Phulong, and is not quite mature. SITALA LIRICINCTA, Stol. Conulema liricineta, J. A. 8. B. 1871, p. 241, pl. xviii. f. 10. Helia liricineta, Conch. Ind. p. 53, pl. exxxii. fig. 7 (too dark in colour). Sitala liricincta, Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Sitala) liricincta, Ney. Hand-list, p. 34 (type specimens). Original description :—‘ Con. testa late conica, tenwi, castanea, apice pallido, vel omnino pallide lutescente, anguste wmbilicato ; an- fractibus 7, conveae gradatis, sutura impressa simplicr junctis, quatuor lirts acutis spiralibus cinctis; liris duabus medianis crassissimis, superna tenuissima basi laevigata, prope peripheriam liris 3-4 tenui- bus, approximatis notata ; lineis increments subtilissimis et confer- tissimis 5 apertura subsemilunart, labio columellari rectiusculo, brevi, supra paulo reflewo ; labro tenui, simplict, arcuato, ‘Major diam. 6°4, minor diam. 6:0, alt. testa 5:8, alt. apert. 2°5, lat. apert. 3-0 mm. ;’’ or major diam. 0°25, minor diam. 0:24, alt. teste 0°23, alt. apert. 0°10, lat. apert. 0°12 unc. * Hab. prope Moulmain, ad flumen Ataran. «The species has the general form of a rather large and elevated Con. palmaria, Bs., but the spiral ribs are more distant and stronger, except at the periphery, which is less sharply carinated. I have not seen the animal; but, judging from the general resemblance of the shell to that of infula, it is tolerably certain that both belong to one and the same genus.” SiTaLa LimaTa, n. sp. (Plate X. figs. 9, 9 a.) Locality. Thamandaiva, Bassein, Pegu (W. Bif.). Shell conoidal, scarcely perforate; sculpture, six thread-like longi- tudinal ribs on each whorl, close and spiral on base ; colour horny brown ; spire conic, apex blunt and rounded, sides slightly convex ; suture impressed ; whorls 5, sides convex ; aperture broadly semi- MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 385 circular ; peristome thin, columellar margin upright, rather thickened, a white callus on the body-whorl. Size: major diam. 2°6 mm., alt. axis 1:6 mm. a O-lO/inch?, «-,2°)/0:06aneh: SITALA CARINIFERA, Stoliczka. Sitala carinifera, J. A. 8. B. 1873, p. 16, pl. i. fig. 8. Nanina (Sitala) carinifera, Nev. Hand-list, p. 33 (the type shell). Original description :—‘‘ Testa globose conoidea, cornea, apice ob- tusulo, angustissime perforato ; anfractibus quinque, gradatim aceres- centibus, convexe angulatis, sutura simplici junctis, transversim minu- tissime striolatis, superis infra medium carinis filiformibus duobus ornatis, ultimo ad peripheriam tricarinato, basi planate convexiusculo, levigato ; apertura semilunari, verticali, non descendente, labro extus tenuissimo, in regione columellari paululum refleaiusculo. “ Diam. maj. 2-2 mm., minor 2:0, alt. teste 2°0 mm. 5 @-O9 mek 55 0:08)" 4, 0-08 inch. “ Hab, ‘ Penang Hill’ in foliis Coffee arabic, specimen unicum. «The animal of this species is exactly like that of S. infula, figured in plate xviii. in J. A. S. B. vol. xl. (1871); it has a generally pale brownish-grey colour ; but having obtained a single specimen, I did not like to sacrifice the shell, in order to notice the internal struc- ture ; for when examining these little species, one is by no means sure that he will obtain from a single specimen an insight into the whole anatomy. “The present species is closely allied to the Nilghiri 1, tricarinata, BIf., which is also a Sitala, and differs by a more depressed and broadly conical shape, and by having a much wider umbilicus.” SrraLa PALMARIA, Benson. (Plate X. fig. 3.) Heliv palmaria, Ann. & Mag. N. H., Feb. 1864, p. 137; Pir. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 575; Conch. Ind. p. 15, pl. xxx. f. 5, 6. Sitala palmaria, Th. Suppl. Cat. p. 20. Original description :—* Testa perforata, subconica, spiraliter 7- lirata, striis filosis obliquis confertissimis decussata, sub epidermide cornea albida ; spira subconica, apice obtusiusculo levigato, sutura impressa ; anfractibus 63, convexis, ultimo subtus convexiusculo, per- tremate leviter carinato ; apertura obliqua, late angulato-lunata, sub- securtformt ; peristomate tenu, recto, margine columellara superne breviter expansiusculo. “Diam. major 84, minor 8, axis 6 mill. “© Hab. ad montem Nundydroog in regione Mysoriana. ‘Two imperfect specimens were found by my son, Captain C. A. Benson, on the Fort Hill of Nundydroog, north of Bangalore, in Mysore, and a single specimen (fully grown, but weathered) by my daughter, Mrs. R. H. Sankey, at the same place, about 4000 feet above the level of the sea. It is very distinct from the various lirate species described by the Messrs. Blanford in the Journ. Asiat. Soe. Beng. for 1861, from the hill-ranges of Southern India.” 36 LAND AND FRESHWATER The specimen figured is No, 66 of Mr. Blanford’s collection and MS. list, a typical specimen from Benson, from the original locality. This measures—Major diam. 8:0, alt. axis 4°8 mm. There are two other specimens in the same collection (No. 67) marked palmaria, var., from the Wynaad, collected by Colonel Beddome ; these are much smaller, but in other respects similar, being only 5:0 mm. in major diameter. Srrata arx, Benson. (Plate IX. fig. 8.) Helix arx, Benson, Ann. & Mag. N. H. 1859, iii. p. 184; Pfr. Mon. Hel. v. p. 90; Conch, Ind. p. 25, pl. liv. fig. 8. Sitala arx, Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20 (Therapon Hill, Tenasserim valley). Nanina (Sitala) arw, Nev. Hand-list, p. 34. Original description :—‘ Testa anguste perforata, acute conica, tenut, striis minutissinus confertissimis obliquis, lirisque 38-4 spirali- bus, validis, superne sculpta, subtus leviori, translucente, olivaceo- cornea; spira gracili, conca, lateribus concavis, sutura marginata, apice acutiusculo, hyalino; anfractibus 73, superioribus conveaius- culis, tum planiusculis, ultimo acute carinato, subtus convexiusculo ; apertura obliqua, trapeziformi, peristomate recto, acuto, margine colu- mellari breviter reflexo, superne perforationem subtegente. “Diam, major 10, minor 9, axis 74 mill. “¢ Hab. ad collem Therabuin, vallis Tenasserim, nec raro; detexit W. Theobald,” ‘«‘ Distinguished by its sculpture and slender concave spire, which recalls that of my Nilgherry species, H. cacuminifera.” This last-named shell, however, is very distinct in its sculpture, and, together with other similar species from peninsular India and Ceylon, form a very distinct group by themselves, which I propose to figure together later on. Figured from specimen in the Benson collection at Cambridge, in which there are five specimens labelled as from Tenasserim. Major diam. 10-0, alt, axis 7-0 mm. SrraLa Rimicota, Benson. (Plate IX. fig. 2.) Helix rimicola, Benson, Ann. & Mag. N. H. 1859, iii. p. 266; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 71; Conch. Ind. p. 28, pl. Ixi. f. 1, Macrochlamys rimicola (sec. D), Theob. Suppl. Cat. p..19. Original description :—‘‘ Testa viv perforata, orbiculato-pyrami- data, tenui, fragili, oblique striatula, diaphana, pallide cornea ; spira conica, apice obtuso, sutura leviter impressa ; anfractibus 53 convexiusculis, ultimo convexo, compresse rotundato ; apertura obliqua, subquadrato-lunari, peristomate tenui, recto, margine columellari verticaliter descendente, basali arcuato. “Diam. major 44, minor 4, axis 4 mm. “Var. peripheria primo subangulata, angulo versus aperturam evanescente, in Juniori mags conspicuo, MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 37 ‘‘ Habitat forma typica prope Landour Himalaye occidentalis, varietas in valle Rungun prope Darjiling, rarissime.” “T got a single fresh specimen of this fragile species in October 1842, in a precipitous rift at the back of the Seinty or Queinty ridge, eastward of my grounds at Rockville, near Landour, and at an elevation of nearly 7000 feet. The Messrs. Blanford have lately procured the variety, but rarely, and in a dead state, in the Rungun valley in Sikkim, at an elevation of 4000 feet. From the data furnished by Mr. W. T. Blanford respecting the resort of species at Darjiling, I observe that the same forms evince a disposition to descend there to a lower altitude above the sea than in the western portion of the range—a circumstance attributable probably to the greater moisture of the climate,—whereas the drought and hot winds, which prevail for so many months in the year at the base of the western ranges, drive species to a greater height in order to obtain the humidity necessary to their existence. At Landour this form escaped the active researches of the late Dr. J. F. Bacon; and I am not aware of its having yet occurred to Capt. T. Hutton.” Locality of specimen figured. Nag-Tiba range, near Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya. Shell globosely trochiform ; sculpture regular, distant longitudinal striation (furrows), crossed diagonally by sharply-defined close-set strie, below regular and concentric; spire conoid, sides flat ; whorls 6, sides moderately convex; aperture ovately lunate; peri- stome thin. SiraLa Rmmrcoua, var. (Plate IX. figs. 4, 4a, 4b, 4c.) Locality. North and west Khasi Hills (G.-<.). Shell globosely conical ; umbilicus hidden ; sculpture, moderately strong, regular longitudinal striation or furrowing, with diagonal coarse ridges of growth; colour very pale horny brown; spire conical, sides slightly convex; suture fine; whorls 6, convex, the last tumid and rounded; aperture ovately lunate, oblique; peri- stome thin, columellar margin strong, reflected, perpendicular. Size: major diam. 0°21 inch, alt. axis 0°16 inch. a 5:4 mm., ae 4:1 mm. Is a very abundant species in the above hills; the apex of the shell is much more acute than in examples from Mussoorie, and it is also larger. SrraLa RIMIcoLA, var., Benson. (Plate IX. figs. 3, 3a.) Locality. Darjiling, 4000 feet (W. 7. B.). Sculpture, very fine close longitudinal ribbing or furrowing, crossed by extremely fine diagonal regular striz of growth, below rather coarser concentric ribbing, near umbilicus. Size: major diam. 4°5, alt. axis 3:0 mm. 4 OS yey, 050-12 imeh. Has flatter sides to spire and whorls, and is more depressed, with finer spire than typical rimicola, 38 LAND AND FRESHWATER Srraza rngussa, W. T. & H. F. Bf. (Plate IX. figs. 5, 5a, 5b.) Helix injussa, J. A.S.B.. 1861, p. 356, pl. i. f. 13; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 181. Nanina (Microcystis) injussa, Ney. Hand-list, p. 38. Original description :— Testa vie perforata, trochiformis, per- tenuis, pallido-cornea, superne peroblique, infra radiatim striata ; spira conica, apie acutiusculo ; anfr. 53, vie convexiusculi, ultimus non descendens, subtus tumidus, ad peripheriam angulatus, angulo antice evanescente ; apertura obliqua, transverse rotundato-lunaris ; peristoma simplex, acutum, margine columellari subverticali, superne brevissime reflexo. “ Diam, maj. 3°25 mm., min. 3 mm., alt, 3°25 mm. s O15 une..." L2une., ..° Ol oune, ‘* Hab, raro in Coonoor Ghat, montium Nilgiri. “The Sikkim and Landour H. vimicola, Bens., is the nearest form to H, injussa with which we are acquainted. The Nilgiri shell has a higher spire, and is considerably smaller in size. From the com- paratively large H. infula, Bens., H. injussa may be easily distin- guished by the absence of the peculiar sculpture of that species, as well as by its fewer whorls and smaller size.” The specimen figured is in Mr. Blanford’s collection and from original locality ; there are two other specimens also from the Nilgiri Hills, No. 58 of his MS. list. On the last whorl rather strong, spiral, parallel, somewhat wavy ridges are crossed by irregular lines of growth; on the apical whorls the transverse ridges are more regular and close together, giving an almost decussate appearance. ‘The aperture is very oblique, and the peristome on outer margin sinuate above, so that the columellar margin is distinctly seen from the side. This specimen measures in major diam. 4:2, alt, axis 3-2 mm. Sivata FEBRILIS, W. T. & H. F. BIf. Helix febrilis, J. A.S. B. 1861, p. 357, pl.ii.f.4; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 188; Conch. Ind. p. 52, pl. xxix. f. 4. Macrochlamys febrilis (sec. EK), Th. Suppl. Cat. p. 20. Original description :—‘ Testa angustissime perforata, globoso-tur- binata, spiraliter lirata ; spira subelevata, conveaa, apice obtuso, sutu- ris valde impressis ; anfr. 43, convert, ultimus non descendens, ad perpheriam subdepressus infra planate rotundatus levis; apertura obliqua, oblonga ; peristoma rectum, acutum, ad basin expansiusculum, columellart breviter refleco, marginibus remotis. “ Diam. maj. 1:5, diam. minor 1°3, alt. 1°25 mm. ‘Hab. apud montes Kalryenmullies, Ind. mer., teste R. Bruce Foote. «« This species bears a general resemblance to H. tricarinata above described, but is readily distinguishable by its higher spire, the absence of the characteristic triple carination, and the flatness of its basal surface. The two specimens received from Mr. Foote are both much weathered, and have lost their colour and much of the MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 39 sharpness of their ornament. This species I cannot find now in Mr. Blanford’s collection. It was figured by Hanley, who only gives a view from behind.” Srrata TrIcaRmNaTa, W. T. & H.F. BIf. (Plate X. fig. 10, the type specimen also figured in the Conch. Indica.) Helix tricarinata, J. A. 8. B. 1861, p. 355, pl. i. f. 10; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 91; Conch. Ind. p. 52, pl. xxix. fa Asehas Sitala tricarinata, Theob. Cat. Suppl. p. 20. Nanina (Microcystis)? tricarinata, Nev. Hand-list, p. 42 (2 sp. ex coll, Blf.). Original description :—‘‘ Testa aperte perforata depresso-turbinata, tenuis, pallide cornea, oblique striatula, subtus obsolete decussata ; spira conoidea, apice planulato, perobtuso, sutura impressa ; anfr. 4, convexi, superne carinis duobus filiformibus cincti ; ultimus tribus medianis, non descendens, subtus rotundatus ; apertura subverticalis, rotundato-lunaris ; peristoma rectum, acutun, marginibus distantibus, sinistro non reflexo. “Diam. 12, alt. 1 mm. “ Hab. prope Pykara ad summos montes Nilgiris.” Major diam. of specimen figured 1-4, alt, axis 1:0 mm. Sirrata suBprnrraTa, G.-A. (Nev. MS.), n. sp. (Plate X. figs. 11, 11 a.) Locality. Little Brother Andaman. Shell depressly conoid, rather openly perforate, covered with a strong epidermis ; sculpture, very fine longitudinal ribbing, well seen on base, crossed by irregular lines of growth; colour dull ochraceous brown; spire flatly conoid, apex flat; whorls 5, with a fine rib on the periphery of the last whorl, with a single intermediate one above it, sides flat from the suture to this, slightly convex above ; aperture ovate, subvertical ; peristome rather thickened ; columellar margin slightly oblique, not reflected. Size: major diam. 2°7 mm., alt. axis 13mm. * 0:07inch, ,, 0-05 inch. SITALA SUBBILIRATA, var. (Plate X. fig. 12.) Locality. Batte Malve. This shell was sent me by Mr. Geoffrey Nevill from the Indian Museum, Calcutta, as No. 206. Sagdinella didrichseni, Morch, with a note attached, “I doubt it being this species.” In this part, further on, I treat of this genus, which will clear up this uncertainty that surrounds Mérch’s genus; and I now find that this shell from Batte Malve agrees well with Nevill’s MS. subdilirata from Little Brother Andaman, only that the shell is not so well grown, and the apex is flatter, and I have therefore figured both. It measures: major diam. 2°3mm., alt. axis 13 mm. 3 0:09 inch, ,, 9:05 inch. 40 LAND AND FRESHWATER No. 206 of Hand-list, p. 42, stands as ‘* Nanina (Microcystis) di- drichsenti, Moérch.” ‘ “‘ Thirty specimens from Nicobar Islands, coll. Dr. F. Stoliczka,” so that it is possible they may not be the same as the shell I figure from Batte Malve. Srrata Brurrata, W. T. Bif. Helix bilirata, J. A.S. B. 1861, p. 352, pl. i. f. 7; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 85; Conch. Ind. p. vil, not figured. Kaliella bilirata (sec. B), Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Sagdinella?) (Microcystis?) bilirata, Nev. Hand-list, p. 41 (South India, ex coll. Dr. F. Stoliczka). This species I have not found in Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection, so am unable to give a figure of it. Original description :—‘ Testa perforata, globosa, turbinata, soli- diuscula, cornea, transverse striata ; spira conoidea, apice obtusulo ; anfr. 7, angusti, sensim acerescentes ; superiores carina una supra mediana muniti, ultimus ad peripheriam acute brcarinatus, subtus tumidus ; apertura subverticalis, angulato-lunaris, perist. rectum, marginibus distantibus, columellari brevi, verticali, reflexo. ‘* Maj. diam. 6mm., axis 44 ~_ eS 0°24 une. ,, Orld uue. “‘ Hab, in montibus Shevroys et Nolamullies, teste W. King. “This species apparently approaches the Ceylonese H. mono- nema, B., in character, but differs in its rounded base and less elevated spire.” Srrata ? verTiana, W. T. & H.F. Bif. (Plate IX. figs. 9, 9 a.) Helix tertiana, J. A.S.B. 1861, p. 355, pl. i. fig. 11; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 71; Conch. Ind. p. 8, pl. xvi. Maerochlamys tertiana (sec. D), Theob. Cat. Suppl. p. 19. Original description :—“ Testa perforata, depresse turbinata, tenuis, pallide cornea, striatula, spira conoidea, apice obtuso, sutura wm- pressa; anfr. 6, angusti, convexi, ultimus haud descendens, subtus rotundatus ; apertura subverticalis, rotundato-lunaris ; peristoma simplex, marginibus distantibus, columellari reflexiusculo. “ Diam. major 2°25 mm., alt. 1°75 mm. 53 O-Isanos, “,; 70°07 une: “Hab. raro ad Pykara, necnon ad Neddiwuttom in montibus Nilgiris.” Specimen figured diam. major 2°5 mm., alt. 1:3 mm. Messrs. Blanford add: “ H. bullula, Hutt., and H. humilis, Hutt., of the Western Himalaya, together with some small Cingalese Helices, appear to belong to the same group.” It occurred at the edges of sholas, in company with Jerdonia trochlea, B., Diplommatina nilgirica, Blfi., and Cyathopoma mala- baricum, Blf. I do not think H. bullula is allied to this species, for there is no sign of spiral striation on that shell ; and H. humilis is, I suspect, a species of the subgenus Patula. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 41 SITaLA SRIMANI, n. sp. (Plate IX. fig. 7.) Locality. Munipur (.-A.). Shell subdepressly turbinate, closely umbilicated; sculpture, with four or five indistinct longitudinal ribs, with rather coarse oblique lines of growth; colour ochraceous brown; spire depressed, apex blunt ; suture well impressed ; whorls 5, sides convex; aperture widely lunate ; peristome rather thickened, columellar margin very oblique and scarcely reflected. Size: major diam. 3°9 mm., alt. axis 2:2 mm. = O-16inch, ,, 0-09 inch. This shell is at first sight very similar to S. tertiana, but its close umbilication and different spire distinguish it. I have named this species after and in remembrance of a Goorkha, Duffadar Sriman, who was in the Khasi-Hills Survey Party, and a most excellent trustworthy man, who, like so many others, fell a victim at last to the climate of that part of India. He became a most diligent collector ; and to him I owe the possession of a large number of shells in my collection, which he even continued to collect atter I had left the Survey Party. I have always noticed that the Goorkha, Lepcha, and Khasia made much more intelligent collectors than the people of the plains 9f India, that they took a far greater interest in the work, and poss“ many of them a great amount of knowledge of animals and plants and their specific differences, while they recognize the numerous species, particularly the birds, by name. SrTaLaA MononEMA, Benson. (Plate IX. fig. 6.) Helix mononema, A. M. N. H. 1853, xii. p. 92; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. iv. p. 37: Reeve, Conch. Icon. f. 1339; Conch. Ind. p. 37, plolxxxyn. f72;,3: Trochomorpha, Pfr, Malakoz. Bl. 1855, p.132; Albers, Die Heliceen, 1860, p. 61. Kaliella, sec. B, Theob. Cat. Suppl. p. 20. lanina (Microcystis) mononema, Ney. Hand-list, p. 41 (8 species, Balapiti, Ceylon). Original description :—“ Testa angustissime perforata, trochiformi, racrato-striata, corneo-albida, glabra, non nitida, translucente, spira conoidea, apice obtuso, sutura distincta ; anfractibus 63—7, superne convexiusculis, filo unico, elevato, tenui, mediano cinctis, ultimo acute Jiloso-carinato, subtus subplanulato ; apertura vertical, securiformi, peristomate recto, acuto, margine columellari brevi, verticali, reflexo, perforationem subtegente. “Diam. major 5, minor 43, axis 4 mill. ‘« Hab, ad Heneratgodde, Ceylon.” Mr. Benson says :—* Allied to the Himalayan H. fastigiata, Hutton, and to the Bengal H. barrack- porensis, Pfr., but well distinguished by its more depressed form and by the filiform line, which, in addition to the keel on the last whorl, runs along the central part of each of the upper whorls. Mr. Layard had not been able to procure a second specimen.” TI do not agree with Mr. Benson as to the alliance or, I would rather say, E 42 LAND AND FRESHWATER similarity between this species and the two above-named shells, the thread-like spiral midrib being so very distinctive of the subgenus 1 now place it in. Srrata? cratuLator, W. BIf. (Plate X. figs. 1, 1 a, 15.) Nanina gratulator, J. A.S. B. 1865, p. 72 (section Trochomorpha) ; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 94. Helix gratulator, Conch. Ind. p. 8, pl. xvi. fig. 2. Sitala gratulator, Theob. Suppl. Cat. p. 20 ; Nev. Hand-list, 1878, p. 33. Original description :—‘* Shell turbinate, perforated, thin, whitish horny. Spire conical; apex obtuse ; suture impressed. Whorls 5, slowly and regularly increasing, convex, spirally lirate and marked with oblique striz of growth above; the last whorl keeled at the periphery, convex and decussately marked with concentric and radiating striz below, not excavated round the perforation. Aper- ture diagonal, subtrapezoidal, breadth exceeding the height; peri- stome thin; margins distant, united by a callus, basal deeply sinuate; columellar vertical, forming a right angle with the basal, and briefly triangularly reflexed above ; reflexed portion thickened and passing half round the perforation. ‘“‘ Major diam. 5-0 mm., minor diam. 4°5 mm., axis 4-0 mm. 33 0-2 i 0-18 »5 0°16 inch. “ Aperture 3mm. broad, 2 high. “‘ Animal with a small mucous pore, and very small lobe above. ‘¢ Hab, Irawaddy valley, Pegu. “This pretty little species abounds near Thayetmyo, and occurs throughout the Irawaddy valley in british Burmah. I do not re- member meeting with it in Arakan. It is easily distinguished from all others of similar form among Indian shells by its oblique mouth, by the peculiar columellar margin of the peristome, and by the strong lirate sculpture. I have much doubt as to whether it should be assigned to Trochomorpha, the species of which group are larger and the animals somewhat different.” This species does not occur, to my knowledge, anywhere on the Indian side in Assam. The subgenus Stfala can be divided into the following very di- stinct groups :— Character. Name. Locality. A. Shell small, pyramidal, closely umbilicated, keeled, more or less fist; jbelow,. with foun jar mt finful® wlrcotiecs Lower Bengal. spiral ribs on the whorls ; colu- RbLe Gta». eitisscn Tenasserim. mellar margin simple, ROG OF | CULM! «idee Sdmven Pegu. Jess oblique; spire with flat sides; confinns : Ss Soils oseaptes + apex acuminate ......66 sseceeeeeeee Rarclge eee Andamans. GPOMATICA «6.62020 Munipur. phulongensis ...... North Kachar Hills. \ Genteincta 2.0000 Tenasserim. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 43 Character. Name. Locality. a’. Shell conoid, apex blunt......... LUMO cacensccee= Pegu. a". Shell conoid, depressed, sides { carinifera ......... Penang. (HONE. Mo cdtindncgubaceneosecatee palmaria ......0+. Mysore. a, Spire high, with concave are Tonaaearin BIGGRIN orto. tn tranecieres ces ciee SRS das Sak tN Ga : B. Shell globose ; whorls tumid, with { rimicola............ N.W. Himalaya. many fine, close-set, longitudinal | 5 WARS ongoscions Darjiling. WANTS = deo Baath scihatchina ot cio Seinan «rates : HvElEA casondone Khasi. 8’, Sides convex; spiral ribbing less]... soy eh Cages THEVA EWG on sgabourcdondBAgoc® aoenee } aoa Pa es Tile b". Globosely turbinate, verysmall febrilis ............ Kalryenmulli Hills. The following species are very distinct forms, and one is tempted to place the first two in a new subgenus :— turreted, with one or two spiral Hibs! rapex flab mee. sets t terete C. Shell depressly conoid; whorls tricarinata ...... Nilghiri Hills, eee: { Little Brother An- e’. Openly umbilicated............... LEU osarct 1 daman Island. SVAD Sicha cect Batte Malve Island. ” arc Shevroy and Kola- Claw AOXO DEUS yan -becehaeieae cance Gir OCG) hed nass { nully Hills, c'", Longitudinal ribbing in- | (70% cos-ese-o-- Mturipat Pads distinct, umbilicated . - MONONCMG . 20.1060 Ceylon. The next is distinct from all the preceding species, and the animal, no doubt, will be found presenting differences :— D. Shell conoid, rounded below ; \ aperture very oblique; spiral ribbing both above and below; +? gratulator ...... Pegu. columellar margin thickened, perpendicular, and twisted ...... ) These are quite distinct, in their sculpture particularly, and will be figured together in a future Part :— (PEDACOLG ae ease Nilghiri Hills. E. Apex acuminate, spire more or BILE Ro iM io a ER Ae CONCAVOSPITA «14... Ceylon. less concave ; transverse ribbing 7 CONMUUS \sousescocene ¥ more regular and defined, a sane spiral sulcation breaking up the { ois By cise former into minute raised dots é ” or dashes, having a longitudinal ieeas Pap ePe Sank q ALTANLOMEME coho. ecbensvesiesiena | phyllophila ...... M ( verrucula ...s.+0 _ Fig. Fig. Fig. LAND AND FRESHWATER EXPLANATION OF PLATE VIII. 1. Sitala infula, Benson, X 4. Caleutta. la. Ditto: sculpture of last whorl, x 180. 14. Sculpture of the apical whorls, x 180. le. Ditto: animal, x 2. From drawing by F. Stoliczka. 1d. Ditto: jaw, enlarged. From drawing by F. Stoliczka. le. Ditto: teeth of radula. From drawing by F. Stoliczka. 1f, Ditto: generative organs, much magnified. 1g. Showing en- largement of oviduct (a). From drawing by F. Stoliezka. 2. Sitala attegia, Bs., X 4. From Moulmain. 2a. Ditto: sculpture of apical whorls, X 180. 2. Sculpture of the last whorl, x 180. 2e. Ditto: right and left shell and dorsal lobes of the mantle, en- larged. From drawing by F. Stoliezka. 2d. Ditto: jaw. From drawing by F. Stoliczka. 2e. Ditto: teeth of radula, 2f. Ditto: generative organs, much enlarged. 3. Sitala attegia, Bs., x 4. Prome, Pegu. 4. culinen, W. BIf., X 4. Pegu. EXPLANATION OF PLATE IX. 1, La. Sagdinella didrichsenii, Morch, X 7. Nicobar. 2. Sitala rimicola, Bs., x 7. Mussoorie, N.W. Himalaya. 2a. Ditto: sculpture of last whorl, x 50. 3. Sitala rimicola, var., Bs., X 7. Darjiling, H. Himalaya. 3a. Ditto: seulpture, xX 50. 4, 4a. Sitala rimicola, var., X 7. Khasi Hills. 4b. Ditto, x 4, viewed from below. 4c. Ditto, nat. size. 5, 5a. Sitala injussa, W. & H. BIf., x 7. Nilghiri Hills. 56, Ditto: sculpture, x 50. 6. Sitala mononema, Bs., X 4. Ceylon. 7. —— srimani (G.-A.), X 7. Munipur. 8. arx, Bs., x 4. Tenasserim. 9, 9a. ? tertiana, W. & H. Bif., x 12. Nilghiri Hills. EXPLANATION OF PLATE X. 1. Sitala gratulator, W. Blf., x 4. Thayetmyo, Pegu. 1a, 16. Ditto, showing form of the columnellar margin, X 7. 2. Sitala confinis, W. Bif., x 4. Thayetmyo, Pegu. 3. palmaria, Bs., * 4. Mysore. 4. —— phulongensis, G.-A., x 7. N.Cachar. 5. —— gromatica, G.-A., X 7. Munipur. 5a. Ditto: sculpture, x 50. 6. Sitala gromatica, var., X 7. 6a. Sculpture. Khasi. 7. —— haroldi, G.-A., x 7. Ta. Sculpture, x 50. Andamans. 8. gromatica, juy., X 7. North Cachar Hills. 9. —— limata, x 12. 9a, X 8. Pegu. 10. tricarinata, W. & H. Blf., x 20. Nilghiri Hills. tS ila subbilirata, G.-A., Nev. MS., X 12. Little Brother An- daman. 12. Ditto, var., Xx 12. Batte Malve Island, Nicobars. Subgenus Sa@DINeELLa. The genus Sagdinella of O, A. L. Mérch was introduced, but without description, in Journ. de Conch. Oct. 1872, in his list of ‘ Mollus- ques terrestres et fluviatiles des Iles Nicobar,” the type form being didrichsenii from Sambelong in that island. He compares it with MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 45 simulans, Adams, a Jamaica form, which is not likely to be related, and he would class with it orcula, Bs., barrakporensis, Pfr., and infula, Bs., of the East-Indian region. The two last,could hardly be classed together on shell-characters, and a genus has already been formed for barrakporensis. In the Journ. de Conch. Oct. 1876, p. 357, in a revision of the Land Shells of the Nicobars, another species is added, viz. H. microtrochus, Moérch, found with the former. He thinks Sagdinella may be allied to Streptaxis in its sculpture (transverse) ; but this would hardly be a sufticient reason on which to form such an alliance, unless combined with other characters. Mr. G. Nevill, in his ‘ Hand-list of the Mollusca in the Indian Museum, Calcutta,’ p. 35, includes both Sagdinella and Kaliella under the subgenus Microcystis, Beck (type ornatella, Beck, from Pitcairn Island, a South-Pacific shell) ; and in this he has placed most of the minute Indian species, many with most varied cha- racters. Knowing that I was engaged working upon these small shells he was good enough to send me a specimen named didrichsenit, from Batte Malve ; but as it did not agree with the original descrip- tion, I applied to the Zoological Museum of the University of Copen- hagen for specimens of the shell. Professor Japetus 8. Steenstrup responded most cordially to my request and kindly sent me a specimen in the Museum, the label in Mérch’s handwriting— “ Sagdinella(Hapalus?) didrichsenii, Roepst. 1877, p. 370. Nicobar.” The original specimen described in 1872 was collected during the voyage of the ‘ Galathea’ by M. Reinhardt, and should be in the Museum at Copenhagen, where most of his shells were placed. The Museum of Kiel received those of M. Behn ; and Cuming obtained duplicates of this last collection described by Pfeiffer, Frauenfeld, &c. I have thus been able to figure a typical shell of this genus and clear up all uncertainty about it, for which I and other conchologists owe our thanks to Prof. Steenstrup. It certainly has no relationship to either Sttala or Kaliella in any way; moreover I do not think it is quite mature, and it possesses, as Mirch says, some similarity in its transverse costulation to that of Streptaais. I here give the original description of the shell; the animal is quite unknown ; but whatever it may be, it undoubtedly belongs to a group quite distinct to those with which Nevill associated it. Herix ? (SaepINELLA) prpRicusENm. (Plate IX. figs. 1, 1a.) Journ. Conch. Oct. 1872, p. 312. Var. B. grandis, Journ. Conch. Oct. 1876, p. 358. Nanina (Microcystis), Nev. Hand-list, p. 42. no. 206 (30 sp. Nicobar, ex coll. Dr. F. Stoliczka). - Original description :—* Testa turbinata, perforate umbilicata, erystallina albida nitida, leviter iridescens ; anfr. 34 convexiuseuli, costulato-striati, ultimus magnus, spiram fere duplo superans, medio obsolete angulatus ; basi levissima ; apertura subrhombea. « Diam. maj. 23 mill., axis 2 mill., aperture altit. 14 mill. “* Hab. Sambelong, sur les bords de la riviére Galathea ; un seul exemplaire. 46 LAND AND FRESHWATER “ Obs. L’Heliv simulans, Adams (Reeve, Icon. f. 351), donne une assez bonne idée de cette espéce. “ 1’H. orcula, Benson (Reeve, f. 1176), en différe par sa spire beaucoup plus élevée. L’H. barakporensis, Ptr. (Reeve, f. 816), et VH, infula, Benson (Reeve, f. 783), de !Hindoustan, appartiennent peut-étre 4 la méme section. La coloration et le genre de costulation de la coquille rappellent les Streptawis. Peut-étre est-ce un Agnathe ?” H, orcula is the only shell above mentioned that approaches it in its sculpture, but it has a strong epidermis. I am sorry that the two specimens in Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection are not quite perfect, and not in a state to take off the glass slide on which they are gummed, so that I cannot give an enlarged figure of it. “ Var. 3. grandis, alt. 3:5 mill, diam. 3. 7’. tenuis, non iridescens linea alba, pellucente, ad suturam. ‘* Hab. Les Nicobar, probablement Kamorta (Roepstorf). Hewrx (SagprvetLa) microrrocuus, Morch, Journ. Conch. Oct. 1876, p. 358. “ Differt a precedente testa obtuse angulata, obtecte perforata, nec umbilicata, columella recta ; linea suturali, alba pellucente. ** Alt. 3°5 mill., diam. fere 3. “* Hab, Avec Vespéce précédente: un exemplaire (Roepstorf). Les Sagdinella doivent étre rangés, peut-étre, pres des Streptaais, d’aprés leur sculpture: quant 4 la forme, elles ressemblent & de jeunes Bulimus (Ena).” Professor Steenstrup informs me this species is not in the museum at Copenhagen, nor could he find it in the collection of « friend of the late Dr. O. Morch ; being a single specimen, it may be in Mr. Roepstorf’s collection. Genus ANADENUS. (Plates VI. & VII.) The genus Anadenus was described by Von F. D. Heynemann in the ‘ Malakozoologische Bliitter,’ 1863, p. 137, pl. i., giving figures of the shell of two species with their lingual dentition. The speci- mens were collected and brought home by the Schlagintweits from India, and the original description is therefore from spirit-specimens as follows :— “ Anadenus (without a tail-gland), ‘*« Body extends the whole length of the sole. Mantle covering the fore part of the body. Respiratory orifice behind the middle of the right side of the mantle. Generative orifice behind the right eye-tentacle. Two upper and two lower retractile tentacles. Back flatly rounded, without a keel and without a tail-gland. Sole in three parts. The jaw with close-set cross ribbing ; the curve of the teeth of the radula almost in a plane. ‘Tooth-plates of rectangular form, with the sides projecting. Middle tooth equilateral, with side points or prickles. Side teeth hardly differing from the middle MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 47 tooth, with the small points on the exterior side. Internal shell present, white, calcareous, with no epidermis; nucleus on the side. « Animal at first sight is ike our German Arion and Limav. It is related to Arion, to Limax only similar. « The relationship to Arion is in the form of the jaw, which has ribs like that of A. empiricorum, but they differ in the following points :— Arion. Anadenus. Tail-gland present. absent. Respiratory opening anterior close behind. to middle of mantle. Internal shell, absent. present. The mantle contains only with distinct lines of scattered calcareous par- growth. ticles. “The absence of the tail-gland is the principal difference between Arion and Anadenus ; less importance must be placed on the posi- tion of the lung-opening. In dead Anadenus it is in the middle ; but the front part of the mantle always contracts more than the hinder part. In Limav it lies behind the middle, but in a spirit- specimen it is in the middle. * The new species is nearest to Geomalacus of Great Britain, which I have not had an opportunity of examining, and from which it differs in the following points :— Geomalacus. Anadenus. End of the body rounded. pointed. Respiratory orifice in the behind the middle. middle of the side of the mantle. Tail-gland present. absent. ‘Tt must not be confounded with Lima, although it is similar in general form, in the position of the respiratory and the genital aper- tures, and in the presence of the inner shell; besides they differ in the jaw and in the terminal end of the body, which in Limaa is always keeled, whereas in Anadenus there is no sign of a keel. «‘ Tf we could see the living animals or get an accurate description of them, undoubtedly further diiferences between similar or related forms would be shown, and in one respect from the formation of the wrinkles of the mantle and the body. As I observed before, in the dead animal the wavy circles on the mantle disappear. It cannot be said whether the mantle of Anadenus is papillate, as in Arion, Amalia, and Geomalacus, or whether it has the structure of Limax. Similarly the wrinkles on the back flatten out, and no accurate description can be made from a spirit-specimen. ‘«¢ From the illustration which I give [ reproduced, Pl. VII. fig. 4] of the skin of the back it is clear that it differs considerably from all known slugs. A furrow runs along the middle of the back, from which side-furrows branch off at an acute angle the spaces en- 48 LAND AND FRESHWATER closed by these furrows are covered with a double row of irregular diverging wrinkles.” ANADENUS GIGANTEUS (type species). From original description, Length of spirit-specimen 80 to 100 mm. bes the mantle 30 to 40. ,, Colour isabelline, brownish. Internal shell 20 mill. long, 12 broad; flat, very thick. Jaw with fourteen ribs, distinct from each other; the last are grown together. Radula: 110 cross rows; the middle tooth slender, long-necked, with long point and signs of side points ; the side teeth not differing much, inclining inward, with still longer points, and likewise signs of side points, and in the less developed teeth towards the edge the points are still much longer with no side points. The upright position of the points (vide orig. fig. 1d, e, f), and which is most prominent in the side teeth, is also peculiar to Avion. From the size of the contracted median and from the circumference of the inner shell and the size of the teeth-plates we can conclude with some certainty that this species is of extraordinary length. Limax dorie of Bour- euignat, who says it is 360 to 450 mm. long (or 13 to 17 inches), has hardly from the plate (in Revue et Mag. pl. viii. June 1861) so large a shell. I do not maintain that this extraordinary length could be reached in giganteus. Equally interesting may it be in a living state from its bright colour, which certainly does not differ much in the spirit-specimen. Hab. Fundort Shimpti (Shipki?), Kumaon; Badrinath to Masuri, Garhvyal. ANADENUS ALTIVAGUS, Theobald. (Plate VI. fig. 1, spirit-specimen.) Limax altivagus, J. A.8. B. 1862, p. 489. Anadenus giganteuvs, Heynemann, Malakoz. Bl. 1863, p. 140, t.i. f. 1; Theob. Suppl. Cat. C. i. p. 65; G. Nevill, Second Yarkand Mission, Mollusca, p. 21. Anadenus? giganteus, Nevill, Hand-list, p. 65 (Changligalli, near Murree). Original description :—*‘ Corpore limacifornu, pallio lente granu- loso, dorso rugose reticulato, more frondis brassice, colore virescente fusco sive lutescente fulvo, interdum nigrescente, et rarissime pallide aurantiaco pallio, minus colorato corpore ; tentaculis quatuor nigris, capite nigro, infra pallescente ; ano ad dextrum latus pallii, prope marginem posito, ad mediam partem via attingente. ‘“* Longitudinis (corpore extenso) 9 une. ‘Habitat montibus Cissutlejensibus prope Fagu, Narkanda, Saraon, &e., 6000 ad 9000. “This Zimax is rather variable in colour, and large specimens, when in motion and extended, exceed 9 inches in length, though their ordinary dimensions is about 6. It feeds on fungi.” This species is evidently the same as that described by F. D. Heynemann in 1863 under the title giganteus and the type of his genus Anadenus. The length of specimens contracted in spirit MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 49 being 80-100 millims., as given by Heynemann, would be quite 6 to 9 inches when living, and extended to their full length. The description as regards texture of the epidermis of the mantle and foot agrees well; and they are both from the same part of the Western Himalayas—Heynemann’s specimens haying been col- lected by one of the brothers Schlagintweit in Shimpti (Shipki?), ? Kumaon, Badrinath to Masuri, Garhval. There is a single un- named specimen in the British Museum collected by the above gentlemen, but it is labelled ‘ Sikkim Himalaya,” which I take to be this species; and this is no doubt a duplicate specimen sent originally to the Hon. EK. I. Co.’s Museum, whence it was lately transferred, with the rest of the collection, to the British Museum: 75 mm. long, mantle 30. Six specimens were sent to me labelled Simla, collected in the rainy season of 1880,” by some friend, who LT have yet to discover, but to whom my best thanks are due, for it is from these specimens the drawings on Plate VI. have been made. They agree in every way with Theobald’s description of altivagus, and with the British-Museum specimen above mentioned. Heyne- mann does not give Sikkim as the habitat of giganteus, though he makes schlagintweiti common to both that and the Western Hima- laya. There may be some error here in the labelling of the speci- mens. ANADENUS ALTIVAGUs, Theob. External description of animal ( from spirit-specimen) collected at Simla (vide fig. 1, Piate VI.)—Slug-like, rounded above; foot rather pointed behind; no gland, with a narrow segmented pedal margin. Mantle closely fitted to the foot behind, only slightly over- lapping on the sides; the neck-lobes only partially developed near the respiratory orifice, with a fine papillate surface. The respiratory and anal orifices (figs. 2 & 3) situated together just above the centre of the mantle-margin. The generative orifice (fig. 4) at a moderate distance (about 8 or 10 mm.) behind the right eye-tentacle. Total length 70-0, mantle length 30-0, mantle breadth 20-0 mm. ss eZ OF a 0-8 inch. Largest spec.: Shell quadrate, flat, thin, horny, white, with con- centric lines of growth, nucleus on right central margin. Y 275 Major diam. 15:0 mm., minor 10:0 mm. te 0-60 inch, ,, 0-4 inch. Odontophore, Sc. The jaw is solid and composed of 13 ribs (Pl. VI. fig. 5). In the radula (figs. 6, 6 a) the centre tooth is broad, with two small pointed projections at the base ; the adjacent laterals are also broad, with a single small blunt tooth on the exterior side; about the 28th from the centre they become much more elongated, and the outer basal tooth is rather sharper. The outermost laterals are oblong at the base, with one long blunt tooth and one or two small teeth disunited and separate from it, but rising from the same base (figs. 6a, 65). These outer teeth are very characteristic of the 50 LAND AND FRESHWATER genus, for nothing like them is to be found in either Arion or Limax. The teeth of this species do not certainly agree with the radula described and figured by Heynemann; there is a similarity only so far as the straight form of the central teeth ; but he distinctly says all the laterals are straight and with no basal cusp, and he thus figures the 54th of giganteus (Taf. 1. fig. 1 f); and the 40th tooth of A, schlagintweiti has this small basal tooth, but he adds that on the extreme laterals it disappears. There were 106 rows in a very complete radula I got out, arranged thus :— 05.1 . 55. The jaw and radula are found to be like that of Geomalacus, to which genus Anadenus has, in this respect, some affinity (vide Plate XII. figs. 4, 4a, 46). Generative organs (Plate VI. fig. 7). The ovotestis (0.t) is bilobed, and situated quite within the folds of the liver-lobes, and is of a pale green tint ; the hermaphrodite-duct is rather long, a good deal convoluted near its lower end, but is straight for a short distance before it joins the albumen-gland ; this organ is very large, and lies on the left anterior side of the animal. The oviduct is of the usual form. The vas deferens (v.d) is given off just above the duct of the spermatheca; it is very long, and is coiled on itself at one point about the middle of its length; this coil lies well forward on the left anterior side behind the left tentacle, and doubles back on itself, and passing up the side of the male organ enters it at the hard rounded posterior end, close to where the retractor muscle is given off. The attachment of this muscle is at the posterior margin of the mantle-cavity ; it is so much contracted in the spirit-specimen as to bring the posterior end of the penis close up to it and the attach- ments of the eye-tentacles, &e. The spermatheca (Sp) is about the same length as the penis, pear-shaped. All the six specimens sent to me from Simla (where they were collected during the rains in June and July, at the period when they are in full activity and development) show the generative orifice much expanded, with the male organ partly protruding (Plate VI. figs. 1 & 4). This discloses the existence of several small, sharp, curved spines fixed upon the surface of this reversed portion. On further opening the generative orifice (Plate VII. fig. 6), these curved spines were discovered to be only the most advanced of a much greater number arranged in two parallel rows (d@) and ex- tending upwards, gradually lengthening, and forming part of a very complicated and beautiful arrangement of far longer and stronger calcareous (c)spines. The frontal side of this curious apparatus was found covered by a large and longitudinally perforated plate (a), which had evidently been built up by the union together at their upper and lower extremities of originally parallel spines. On the posterior side of this basal portion of the male organ one very large, long, spear-shaped spine (c) was situated; this measured 8 mm. in length. The whole of this complicated structure must therefore be regarded as representing the simple dart-sac with a single dart, MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 51 as seen in other genera of the Helicidee, for the fixed position of the bases of these spines in the integument of the lower swollen portion of the male organ precludes the idea of its being a spermatophore. On following the large duct of the penis upwards towards the junc- tion with it of the vas deferens (fig. 6 a), the end of the penis is seen, occupying the upper swollen portion; so that here we have appa- rently the penis and the dart-sac almost united together, instead of, as is usual, the dart contained in a distinct and long sac of its own; but this, after all, is only a question of degree, for the transition is seen in such rudimentary pouches of the dart in Heliw pisana (vide pl. xix. fig. 16, Moquin-'Tandon’s ‘ Mollusques de France,’ and Helix bulimoides, pl. xx.). Can it be that in this species the great development of spines and this plate has converted this organ into one of a holding or clipping nature on their interlocking or entanglement prior to or during the act of copulation ? for after expansion or protrusion the muscular contraction would draw these spines together very tightly. One of the most interesting points in the anatomy of this species is the relative position of the heart and renal organ (Plate VII. fig. 5), in which respect it has a considerable similarity to what is seen in Arion and Geomalacus, encircling the heart. The position of the ventricle is, however, different, on the posterior edge of the mantle-cavity and directed backwards; it is large and flatly pear- shaped. The renal organ is ovate and is divided into two portions by a main secretory duct, the inner portion forming a nearly complete narrow disk round the ventricle and commencing from near where the aorta is given off. The renal organ is quite free for three quarters of its anterior margin, the dorsal surface (which is under- neath in fig. 5) being spread over with the network of the pul- monary veins, the ventral surface of the pulmonary sac being shown in the figure. The retractor muscles of the eye-tentacles, odonto- phore, and penis (7.m. 7'., O., P.) are all situated in a line close together at the posterior margin of the mantle; and in this they are thus somewhat more like Arion, only that the muscle of the buccal mass has a more posterior position for its attachment. ANADENUS SCHLAGINTWEITI, Heynemann, Malakoz. Blit. 1863, p. 41. Anadenus schlagintweiti, Theob. Cat. C. i. p. 65. This species would appear to be externally very similar to A, altivagus, or the typical species of Heynemann, but smaller. There are two specimens in the British Museum which may probably be this species, and out of the Schlagintweit collection. They are both of a dark grey colour and smaller than altivagus. One is marked ‘‘Bias at Bishisht, Kulu Himalaya ;” the second “On road from Simla to Sultanpur, Himalaya.” Heynemann gives, besides these two places, Bias Kund, Rotang Pass, and Sikkim ; but I doubt the Sikkim locality. 52 LAND AND FRESHWATER Original description :—“ Length of spirit-specimen 45 to 60 mm. * Length of the mantle 25 mm. “Colour ash-grey or blackish. «Internal shell 11 mm. long, 74 broad, massive, thick, flat. “Jaw with 16 ribs. “ Radula 125 rows of 90 teeth. 935 AHO ye toy) BO ua55 ‘Middle tooth broadly triangular, with moderately long points ; the side points are somewhat broader at the base ; side teeth hardly differ from the middle tooth, inclined inwards. The shape does not perceivably change even towards the side, only at last the side point disappears, “The young animal. On the back part of the mantle is a black spot, which runs in a point in front and encloses a small space, which is brighter than the rest of the mantle. The sides of the mantle are black-spotted, and down the sides of the body runs a black stripe, which towards the back is sharply marked out, but towards the sole is shaded off; the top of the back is again some- what darker. “Tt is very probable that, as in the case of many European slugs which in their young state are similarly coloured, this coloration disappears through the darkening of the whole skin. “Habitat. Sikkim ; Simla to Sultanpur; Bias at Bishisht, Kulu ; Bias Kund, Rotang Pass. ‘“* As these two forms were obtained from different localities, we may consider the species to be generally distributed and common ; according to Schlagintweit it exists at 13,420 feet. In all proba- bility their food is fungi.” ANADENUS JERDONI, nN. sp. (Plate VII. fig. 7, spirit-specimen.) Kashmir (7’. C. Jerdon). In coll. Brit. Mus. Description from spirit-specimen. Animal large. The mantle apparently finely papillate in life. The foot above very coarsely wrinkled, rounded at extremity. No gland. a Tmde tel CF) te? ; ai te " _ =) neal we cmcatett ishing wif 6 ons ant © a ee +s pay PEGS ine i. aii Valea Th s(Glew gf 4 Beez ate ae (6. be 7 PY sf ina A a Abb eal aay ae ees bliip, : : ue eryy ak iil ak” eo ualk>, Oy @ =I. af ric LITA Ll ae Son aie * =) i Es a 4 AN we ‘thi S,* Patten. « x - ; ip j wr Pile i ii ; cre ne 1 (Upset qij« eS Oye Pa } ri tiel ee 4 PT A ies aj) ahiyt 7-1) Gyiiay™ F ive *y a zal eh ° dil s 4 Pei eae LF or eA a" rk « 4 « (ihegead m thee Wii Ae Py TVS * bg hale vole ts by) ve eee "i ' epee * i Vi) ime ar ea fg Sari iaind Le ] Mids waels 7 ayn , 4 i =a ry oe na’ bv) 74 : 5 y = tee } Mi) NGPA, Ayal , WALI yh atin ipeasl mnie pureed =F i bat oe out Pate >ritis an | dyn) ‘ Je itp ba (i I “uu oi Oienirc. of ‘upral ithe rie! ars h aa rites cit (GG ce Sie et pet eis rhe hss Pad wide eT Bi ve! OW BAe wm, JAL ot BTL aa) eek mt) ofl A re Fe Anna ai: :7 ave dine ta qlivd ee te " fy oh 8 bua 4 Lt ean i é Py iy ai Lio’ fda? omit \# : P : 7 ‘ere # Ta I impiete. Hal if ANOLE ht ea wet 4 (rab voitiite Walp 2 Ge wee L otiuast ufdd it ieee onidine nb, eh ane vithipal vray (eee st vow sit (peer hy f rey h bi rut La? neh mith ihe yn as Sreah pre "ng PTA Lae Sell iis ay A 4 - <7 alien ltive’ TL yt 10 Siete mi » ie fm! . LAND AND FRESHWATER MOLLUSCA OF | si et 68 bial ar Part ITI._ JANUARY 1883. (Plates XIII.-XX1.) Tue shells that are now figured on Plates XIII. to XVII. are all of very small size, and many of them are described for the first time. I had hoped in this Part to be able to figure some of the small operculated shells which are included in Mr. Sylvanus Hanley’s “ Systematic List of Species ” in the ‘Conchologia Indica,’ though not figured in that work, and the large number that have been found since ; but Ihave thought it best to continue the minute Zonitide, and record the little-known forms of this family before entering on another. It has become somewhat a difficult matter to know under what genus to place most of these little shells. We know nothing of the animals, still less of their anatomy: in the case of some species it is doubtful even to what family they belong; for instance, the more or less depressedly pyramidal shells on Plate XVI. are transversely sculptured like Kalella, and I bring them into that subgenus. In India the Zonitide altogether exceed the Helicide in number, and those genera and subgenera which come into the latter family are mostly of large and characteristic form. I am therefore obliged to group them, to a certain extent, by outward form of shell and the sculpture well magnified ; and as this depends almost entirely on the form and action of the mantle, it is of a certain value. Thus guided by sculpture, those shells figured on Plate XIII. approach the subgenus Sitala, for longitudinal ribbing is characteristic of all and is always well seen on the base and apex, though somewhat obliterated on the face of the whorls by the transverse lines of growth. In the strong epidermis of some, hirsute in others, or very oblique undulate ribbing there is much divergence ; and these again merge into forms like Mucrochlamys, as shown on Plate XIV., to which I suspect several belong. For some of these species we might establish subgeneric titles, and they will perhaps be necessary to complete the chain of classifi- cation ; it is better, however, to wait and learn more about them PART III. H 68 LAND AND FRESHWATER before doing so. Helix conulus, Blf., stands alone, a very peculiar form, which cannot be put in any of the genera I am now figuring. Blanford placed it in Kaliella with doubt, and I follow him. The examination of the odontophore of a species on Plate XV. shows close relationship with Aaliella; and the dissection of a species (figs. 1 & 2 on Plate XVII.) from Cherra Poongee settles definitely the position of most of the shells on that Plate in the genus Macrochlamys, and thus leads up through these small forms to the illustration of it in detail on Plates XVIII., XIX., and XX. On Plate XXI. I give drawings of the sculpture of several species of Zonitide, which I found useful when roughly grouping them together. The description and synonymy of Macrochlamys indica will be given in Part IV., together with tugurium, petrosa, resplendens, decussata, and other large species of the genus, which perhaps contains more species than any other in the Indian Region, and those species ex- ceedingly variable in form. With reference to the discovery of Kalella in Madagascar, Mr. Edgar Smith writes as foliows, in the P. Z.S. for 1882, p. 375: —* One minute species, H. barrakporensis, has not previously been met with except in India, where it may have been introduced, as is the case with the large Achatina fulica, a most abundant shell in some parts of Madagascar and also at the Mauritius.” The intro- duction of this last by Mr. Benson into Calcutta is well known; and since then it has spread all over Calcutta and its suburbs up to Barrakpur, where I have seen it, and across the Hooghly into the Botanical Gardens, the eggs, no doubt, transported in the roots of garden plants. It has thus become a perfect pest—a somewhat similar and questionable benefit to the country as the introduction of the rabbit and sparrow has been to Australia. Now Kaliella barrakporensis is not a parallel case, but one that must remain an example of great extension of a species. It is a most abundant shell over a vast area of country from the Sundabunds to the Himalayas, there being few small shells so abundant. Family ZONITIDAE (continued). Subgenus Karteria (continued from page 24). KALIELLA LAILANGKOTENSIS, n. sp. (Plate XV. figs. 1, 1 a.) Locality. Lailangkote, Khasi Hills (H, H. G-A.). Shell depressedly conoid, subangular on periphery, closely umbi- licated ; sculpture, covered with a strong epidermis, well ribbed transversely, crossed by regular longitudinal fine ribs; colour pale ochre; spire low, blunt; suture impressed; whorls 5, somewhat flattened; aperture subvertical; peristome sinuate below, thin, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 4-8 mm., alt. axis 2°3 mm. 3 0-19 inch, ,, 0:09 inch. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 69 This shell is very abundant at Lailangkote among the large weathered masses of granite there ; but it was found also at Mairang, Teria Ghat, Maotherichan Peak, and Mokarsa. From one of these dried specimens I have been able to extract the labial ribbon and jaw, which I figure on Plate XX. The central tooth is tricuspid, the centre cusp long; the next five median teeth are rather broad, pointed, long, with small denticles on both the outer and inner basal sides; the sixth and seventh are similarly tricuspid; from the eighth outwards all are bicuspid, but the outer cusp never reaches to the same length as the inner. In this respect this dentition differs from that of Macrochlamys. The dental formula is 269 28 Toe 2*. 26 The jaw is simple, the cutting-edge concave, with a low convexity in the median area. The mantle-lobes could not be made out in this specimen. The central and median teeth are thus as in Kaliella and the formula is the same; the only difference lies in the laterals being bicuspid in this species. This character of the odontophore, together with the keeled form of the shell, shows that it should be placed in that subgenus together with other species on Plate XV. Two specimens of this shell have been sent me by Mr. G. Nevill (collected by Mr. Robert in the Naga Hills) as no. 209 of his ‘ Hand- list,’ Nanina (Microcystis), n. sp., p. 42, ‘14, Naga Hills, coll. M ajor Godwin-Austen, W. Robert, and A. W. Chennell, Esqs.” I do not possess a single specimen from that district ; there must have been some mixing of shells here. KALIELLA KEZAMAHENSIS, ND. sp. (Plate XV. figs. 3, 3a.) Locality. Kezamah, Anghami Naga Hills; Gaziphima, Naga Hills (C7, GEA"): Shell subturbinate, well umbilicated, covered with strong epi- dermis, base flat; sculpture rather coarse, decussate, like cloth, the transverse ribbing the strongest; colour, specimen bleached; spire conoid, sides convex, apex blunt; whorls 53, convex, keeled sharply on last; aperture semilunar ; peristome rather thickened, very oblique near axis. Size: major diam. 4:1 mm., alt. axis 2°0 mm. rs 0:16 inch, ,, 0-08 inch. T have been successful in extracting the labial ribbon of this species, which is the same as that of the preceding (lailangkotensis) as regards the central or median teeth being tricuspid, only that it does not possess the two transitional teeth between the median and laterals; and these last are more distinctly unilateral, the outer cusp being situated near the base and never rising so high towards the point as in lailangkotensis. The formula is Dorie 26. 20 Bil, dkg Bill H 2 70 LAND AND FRESHWATER Jaw not seen. With this specimen I was also fortunate to find the spermatophore, which will be figured in the next Part with the above odontophore. KALieLLa ? BURRAILENSIS, n.sp. (Plate XV. figs. 5, 5a, 56.) Locality. Burrail range, Naga Hills (G.-A.). Shell closely umbilicated, depressedly conoid, keeled ; sculpture, on base well-marked radiating ridges of growth, crossed by fine con- centric ribbing; colour pale dull ochraceous; spire, sides flatly convex, apex rounded ; suture very shallow ; whorls 5, flat ; aperture narrow, semilunate ; columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 5:7 mm., alt. axis 2-4 mm. 3 0:23 neh, se Oa Oanech: This shell approaches A. ruga in its form, but has not got the small indentation on the base of the last whorl; it may also at first sight be mistaken for both lailangkotensis and kezamahensis ; but its close umbilication and large size distinguish it. Only two specimens were obtained. Katietia? RuGA, n.sp. (Plate XV. figs. 4, 4 a.) Locality. Phinggam, Lahipa Naga Hills, on the trap-boss near the village ; Shiroifurar Peak, 9000 feet (H. 1H. G.-A.). Shell depressedly turbinate, well rounded below, umbilicate, covered with strong epidermis, with a single palatal plica or tooth within the aperture * ; sculpture like cloth, irregular, coarse, the transverse ribbing the strongest, below smoother, with a few transverse ribs ; colour pale horny brown; spire low, sides convex, apex flat; suture slightly impressed ; whorls 5, regularly increasing, the last angular at periphery; aperture narrow, sublunate, vertical, the tooth-like process just within on lower margin, this is oblong, blunt, but slightly raised and directed obliquely backwards, and in some speci- mens two are to be seen, one behind the other; this tooth appears to be formed during periods of arrested growth, the old edge of the aperture being apparent near it ; peristome thin, thickened towards the columellar margin, which is much oblique to the axis. Size: major diam. 3°6 mm., alt. axis 1:8 mm. Aa 0-14 inch, ,, 0-07 inch. KaLieLia? NEVILLI,n.sp. (Plate XIII. fig. 6.) Locality. Darjiling. Shell subpyramidal, openly umbilicated, thin, fragile, subangulate, the periphery ornamented with a line of hairs, which are pointed ; sculpture very oblique and distant, well-marked costulation ; colour olive-brown ; spire conoid, sides flat ; suture well impressed ; whorls * A similar palatal tooth to this is found in H. helicifera, BIf., from Arakan, of which I shall hereafter give a drawing, as it is not shown in the figure in the ‘Conch. Indica,’ nor is the peculiar columellar margin very well delineated. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 71 5, last well rounded below; aperture very ovate ; peristome thin and scarcely reflected. Size: major diam, 0-30, alt. axis 0-14 inch. x Tei . 35 mm. This species was sent me by Mr. Geoffrey Nevill, from the Indian Museum collection, Calcutta, where the type figured will be sent. It was, I believe, discovered by Colonel Mainwaring. Its generic position is very doubtful. Katierra ? conutus, W. T. Blanford. (Plate XV. figs. 6, 6 a.) Sec. Kaliella? Nanina conula, W. Blf. J. A. 8. B. 1865, pt. 2, vol. xxxiv. p. 73; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 89 ; Conch. Ind. p. 52, pl. cxxix. figs. 5, 6. Kaliella, sec. A, Theob. Supp. Cat. p. 20. Locality of figured specimen. Jatinga valley, North Cachar Hills, and I have one other shell from Munipur. Sculpture, longitudinal fine ribbing, most marked on the apical whorls, crossed by fine, irregular, very oblique striz ; colour white. There is one of the four original specimens in Mr. W.T. Blanford’s collection, fixed upon a glass slide, with which I have compared the above, but it was too thin and delicate a shell to remove for figuring ; they agree perfectly. Size: major diam. 3:1, alt. axis 2°90 mm. Original description :—* Shell subperforate, turreted, white, horny, thin, translucent, marked with oblique sinuous subfiliform costulate striation, and below the centre of the whorl with very fine spiral lines, only visible under a powerful lens; spire conical, apex rather obtuse; suture deeply sunk. Whorls 6, very convex, keeled in the centre, the keel very fine, raised, thread-like, opaque and white; the last whorl bicarinate, the second raised spiral line being below the periphery ; flatly convex beneath, and marked by radiating striee and concentric impressed lines. Aperture oblique, tumidly and subangularly lunate, about equally broad and high; peristome thin; margins distinct ; columellar nearly vertical, very briefly reflexed at the penultimate whorl. “Diam. 13 mm. = 0-07 inch. «Height 2 \),, == 07038" ., “ Hab. Phoung-do, Arakan. « A minute species, remarkable for its keeled and convex whorls. Only four specimens were found.” It would be interesting to know the anatomy of this species and the relationship to its neighbours. KALIeLiA? LEITHIANA, n. sp. (Plate XVI. figs. 6, 6a, 66.) Locality. Ceylon (ea coll. Dr. Leith). Shell narrowly umbilicated, discoid, keeled, base flat; sculpture covered with an olivaceous epidermis, irregular transverse lines of growth ; spire very depressedly conoid, sides flat, apex blunt ; whorls 64, all very equal in breadth, flat; aperture elongate, narrow, per- pendicular ; peristome thin, columellar margin upright, short. Te, LAND AND FRESHWATER Size: major diam. 7:0 mm., alt. axis 2-4 mm. This specimen was purchased from a dealer, having come from the late Dr. Leith’s collection ; it was still on the original card he had eummed it on, so that the habitat can be trusted. It is to be regretted the exact locality is unknown, as I have only one specimen. However, it may be well known to others who have collected in the island of Ceylon. KALIELLA ? DIKRANGENSIS, n. sp. (Plate XVI. fig. 3.) Locality. Dikrang valley, Dafla Hills, Assam (H. H, G.-A.). Shell globosely conoid, keeled, imperforate, much rounded below ; sculpture, very microscopic, transverse regular costulation, the finest T have seen; colour pale amber; spire pyramidal, sides nearly flat, apex well rounded; suture moderately impressed ; whorls 6, closely wound; aperture narrowly quadrate; columellar margin strong, perpendicular, with a slight protuberance on the inner margin. Size: major diam. 1°6 mm., alt. axis 1-1 mm. 0:065 inch, ,, 0:°045 inch. This shell, of which I only possess one example, is similar in form and comes nearest to A. nongstemmensis, but is very much smaller, the spire less conoid, and much more rounded below. ‘The sculpture is similar to that of Aaliella ; and I place it at the end of that subgenus until something more is known of the anatomy of these very minute species. KALIELLA ? NONGSTEINENSIS, n. sp. (Plate XVI. fig. 2.) Locality. Maotherichan Peak, 6297 ft., North Khasi (H.H. G.-A.). Shell conical, well rounded below, keeled, subperforate ; sculpture very minute, regular transverse ribbing; colour pale ochraceous; spire high, sides convex, apex rounded; suture moderately im- pressed; whorls 8, closely wound, sides flatly convex; aperture quadrate, narrow, suboblique; peristome thin, columellar margin straight, short, thickened. Size: major diam. 20 mm., alt. axis 1-7 mm. = 0-08 imch, , 0:07 inch. I possess only one specimen of this very pretty shaped well- marked shell. IT have named it after that part of the Khasi Hills which is under the “Seem,” or chief, of Nongstein. KALiELLA ? TIRUTANA, n.sp. (Plate XVI. fig. 4.) Locality. North Khasi Hills, three specimens obtained (1. H. G.-A.). Shell globosely conoid, base rounded, solid, keeled; sculpture smooth, with a few indistinct lines of growth; colour bleached ; spire conical, sides flat; suture moderately impressed ; whorls 6, closely wound, narrow; aperture narrow, rectangular; peristome rather thickened, columellar margin strong, vertical, and a distinct thickening or callus on the lower margin. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 73 Size: major diam. 0:07, alt. axis 0°05 inch. a 1:8 se ced ams For want of a better, I have named this shell after the Demon Tirut, to whom the Khasias so constantly sacrifice and propitiate with offerings. KatreELLA ? TIRUTANA, n. sp., Juv. (Plate XVI. fig. 5.) Locality. Khasi Hills (H. H. G.-A.). Spire moderately high, conic, sides flat, apex rounded; suture impressed ; whorls 6, sides convex; aperture narrow, long, quad- rate; peristome thin, but strong and thickened on the columellar margin. Size: major diam. 0-051, alt. axis 0:034 inch. 5 1:3 a .O°Smm: Katieiia ? CHENNELLI, n.sp. (Plate XVI. fig. 1.) Locality. Lhota Naga Hills. Shell depressedly turbinate, much rounded below, sharply keeled, not umbilicated ; sculpture very finely ribbed transversely, springing from a well-defined sutural band, smooth below, and apparently slightly and finely hairy when fresh; colour pale horny brown; spire pyramidal, sides flat; suture shallow; whorls 64, closely wound, regular, sides flat ; aperture narrow, elongate; peristome thin, columellar margin perpendicular, rather thickened, sinuate below. Size: major diam. 3°6 mm., alt. axis 2°0 mm. Bs 0:14 inch, ms oumeh. A single specimen only obtained by Mr. A. Chennell, of the Topo- graphical Department, who brought in a number of shells when surveying the above hills, for which I am deeply indebted to him and other members of the Topographical Survey who assisted in surveying the Assam hill-country. Herrx ? (——?) etomerosa, n.sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 9.) Locality. Dikrang valley, Dafla Hills (H. H. G.-A.). Shell globular, subperforate ; sculpture indistinct, very close longi- tudinal striz; colour dull olivaceous ; spire conoid, rounded above, sides convex; suture shallow ; whorls 6, the last very tumid; aper- ture narrowly lunate, contracted slightly on the outer margin, a well-marked callus on the body-whorl; peristome strong for size and somewhat thickened below into an indistinct tooth, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 1:3 mm., alt. axis 0°-7 mm. x 0-05 inch, ,, 0:03 inch. This very minute pretty shaped shell is unlike any thing I have found in India; and I place it in the Helicidie, for its true relation- ship is very uncertain. 74. LAND AND FRESHWATER Genus Srrata (continued from page 43). Srrata? BALLIANA, n. sp. (Nev. MS.). (Plate XV. fig. 2.) Loeality. Hills near Ganjam, Madras (V. Bail). Shell umbilicate, carinate, conoid; sculpture, transverse rather irregular fine ribbing or costulation, with four or five strongly marked longitudinal ribs ; colour umber-brown, covered with a strong epider- mis ; spire rather high, conic, sides slightly convex; suture im- pressed; whorls 5, very conyex; aperture semilunate; peristome moderately thickened and slightly reflected near umbilicus. Size: major diam. 3°6 mm., alt. axis 2;0 mm. O-14 inch », 0°08 inch. This shell falls close to S. palmari ia (p. 35, Plate X. fig. 3) in its keeled and conoid form; but it is very ae smaller, unbiased, and the longitudinal ribbing i is not so high in relief, being finer and closer. SITALA UvIDA, n. sp. (Plate XIII. fig. 5.) Locality. Teria Ghat, south base of Khasi Hills (7. H. G.-A.). Shell narrowly umbilicate, globosely conoid; sculpture wavy, transverse ribbing, crossed by fine indistinct longitudinal lines, which are more distinct on apex, and distant well-marked concen- tric ribbing on the base; colour pale sienna-brown ; spire conoid ; suture well impressed ; whorls 5, closely wound, convex; aperture ovate, oblique; peristome rather thickened, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 0-11 inch, alt. axis 0°07 inch. 2°8 mm., e 1-7 mm. Also one from the Jatinga valley, North Cachar Hills. Somewhat like S. srimant (Plate IX. fig. 7); but the form and sculpture distinguish them when the shells are placed side by side, wvida being higher in the spire and with much rounder whorls. This species, together with the next, should come in after tertcana and srimant in the Table given in Part II. page 43. I defer the continuation of this synopsis of the species until more are figured and described. SITALA PLACITA, n.sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 3.) Locality. Khasi, one specimen (type); Munipur, one specimen (H. H. G.-A.). Shell, perforation concealed, globosely conoid ; sculpture, distant longitudinal ribbing, on the base far apart and well raised; colour pale horny; spire rather high, conic, apex blunt; suture impressed ; whorls 43, convex, last well rounded on periphery ; aperture ovate or nearly semicircular ; columellar margin suboblique. Size : atin diam. 2°8 mm., alt. axis 2°0 mm. O-11 Hehe bs 0-08 inch. This shell in its form approaches S. srimani (Plate LX. fig. 7), but is not so flat on the base. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. ie SrTaLa suBNANA, n. sp. (Nevill, MS.). (Plate XIV. fig. 6.) Locality. Jessore. Shell conoid, angulate on the periphery, rather flat on the base, perforation hidden ; sculpture, finely decussate, regular coarse trans- verse ribbing, crossed by regular fine longitudinal lines; colour pale sienna-brown; spire conic, sides slightly convex; suture shallow; whorls 4, flatly convex; aperture semilunate ; peristome oblique on columellar margin and slightly reflected. Size: major diam, 0-11 inch, alt. axis 0-06 inch. 2-8 mm., < 15 mm. This shell has no relationship with nana, Hutton, from the N.W. Himalaya. That shell has the distinct transverse “fine costulation of Kaliella (vide Plate VY. fig. 6). SITALA ? CRENICINCTA, n.sp. (Plate XIII. fig. 2. Locality. Lailangkote, Khasi Hills (7. H. G.-A.). Shell perforate, depressedly conoid, covered with a_ thick epidermis, with two parallel rows of fine hairs, pointed under high power ; sculpture, transverse irregular ribbing, with regular rather distant continuous longitudinal raised ridges, very distinct on apex, fine concentric ribs on base; colour pale olive-brown ; spire low ; suture impressed ; whorls 4, last rounded; aperture ovately lunate, oblique ; peristome thin, columellar margin weak, not reflected. Size: major diam. 0-09 inch, alt. axis 0-05 inch. 2°3 mm., “ 1:3 mm. Other acalaees: Marangsip ‘Peak ; Jawai; Teria Ghat; Shillong ; Kopamedza Peak, Naga Hills; Munkén valley, Jaintia. A variety from the wood at Mairang, slightly larger and very narrowly perforate. Srrata? mntonsa,n. sp. (Plate XIII. figs. 1, 1a, 1.) Locality. Marangsip Peak, Khasi Hills (H. H. G.-A.). Shell umbilicate, globosely conical, slightly hirsute; sculpture, irregular ridges of growth, crossed longitudinally with fine and coarser ribbing, a few concentric fine distant ribs on base ; colour olive-brown; spire moderately high, obtuse and rounded ; suture impressed ; whorls 5, sides convex ; aperture ovately lunate ; peri- stome thin, very slightly reflected. Size: major diam. 0°15 inch, alt. axis 0-08 inch. Pe 3°S mm., He 2:0 mm. Sirata? RECONDITA, n.sp. (Plate XIII. figs. 4, 4a, 4 6, 4c.) Locality. (Type) Raliang, North Jaintia Hills; Jawai near Mun- tidoo river; Khasi Hills (#/. H. G.-A.). Shell depressedly conoid, perforate ; sculpture, above regular, 76 LAND AND FRESHWATER very oblique costulation, on base smooth, but under lens beauti- fully concentrically and regularly striate, the oblique costulation does not extend to the suture, and each long rib has, above, a short parallel rib adjacent to it (vide fig. 4c); colour pale sienna- brown; spire low, apex blunt; suture impressed: whorls 4, regu- larly increasing ; aperture oblique, ovately lunate; peristome thin, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 0°10—0°12 inch, alt. axis 0°05 inch. 3 2°5-3°0 mm., $6 1:3-1°6 mm. Genus Macrocutamys, Benson. This generic title first occurs, but without description, in the J. A.S. B. vol. i. p. 13, January 1832, in a paper by Benson, who writes :—‘‘ Those (Pterocyclus, sp.) which I found were, with several specimens of a Cyclostoma, a reversed Carocolla and Macrochlamys ;” and in a footnote, “anew genus of the Helicidie, separated by me from Helix in consequence of the wide departure of the animal from the type of that genus ;”’ and the species is indicated, but not then described, from the Gangetic delta, on page 76 of the same volume, for in February 1832 Mr. W. H. Benson presented to the Society a series of the land and freshwater shells of the Doab and of the Gan- getic provinces, with a list, in which occurs “Helia (Macrochlamys) indicus, Benson, separated from Helix on account of the difference of character in the animal.” The genus is again referred to in vol. v. of same Journal, pp. 350, 351 (1836). After describing Nanina decussata, Benson says, ‘¢ On a cur- sory inspection of this shell I erroneously considered it to be a variety of the species vitrinoides, Deshayes, belonging to Mr. Gray’s genus Nanina (Zool. Proc. July 8, 1834), which I indicated under the name of Macrochlamys in the first number of the ‘ Journal of the Asiatic Society ’ for January 1832, pp. 13 and 76, and which I altered to that of Tanychlamys in a paper on the genus read before the Zoolo- gical Society in August 1834. Mr. Gray’s characters, drawn up from specimens preserved in spirits and from General Hardwicke’s drawings, having the advantage of priority of publication, his name, although inexpressive, will necessarily be adopted. Several inde- pendent observers haye united in stating the necessity of separating this genus from //elzwv on the characters of the animal ; witness the observations of Lieut. Hutton (J. A. S. B. vol. iii. p. 83).” Again, in 1834, Mr. Benson exhibited a collection of shells from the Gangetic provinces of India, and gave a full description of this genus under the title Zanychlamys (altered by the editor to Nanina), at the August meeting of the Zoological Society, and recorded in the ‘ Proceedings,’ p. 89, as follows :— * A collection of Land and Freshwater Shells formed in the Gan- getic Provinces of India by W. H. Benson, Esq., of the Bengal Civil Service, and presented by that gentleman to the Society, was exhi- MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. TT bited. It comprised forty species, and was accompanied by a de- scriptive list prepared by the donor, and also by detailed notices of some of the more interesting among them. These notices were read; they are intended by Mr. Benson for publication in the forth- coming number of the ‘ Zoological Journal.’ From the time that he first became acquainted with the animal of a shell, resembling in all respects, except in its superior size, the European Helix lucida, Drap., Mr. Benson regarded it as the type of a new genus of Helicide, in- termediate between Stenopus, Guild., and Helicolimaw, Fér. He had prepared a paper on this genus, for which he intended to pro- pose the name of Zanychlamys ; he finds, however, that Mr. Gray has recently described (p. 58) the same genus under the name of Nanina.” The generic characters observed by Mr. Benson are as follows :—- Nanina, Gray. First original detailed description of shell and animal of Macro- chlamys :—“Testa heliciformis, umbilicata ; peritremate acuto, non reflexo. “Animal cito repens. Corpus reticulosum, elongatum. Palliwm amplum, foramine communi magno perforatum, peritrema amplexans ; processubus duobus transverse rugosis (quasi articulatis) omni latere mobilibus instructum, unico prope teste aperture angulum swperio- rem exoriente, altero apud peripheriam teste. Os anticwm inter ten- tacula inferiora hians ; labia radiato-plicata. Tentacula superiora elongata, punctum percipiens tumore oblongo situm gerentia. Penis pregrandis ; antrum cervicis elongatum latere dextro et prope ten- tacula situm. Solea complanata pedis latera equans. Cauda ten- taculata ; tentaculum subretractile glandula ad basin posita humo- rem viscidum (animale attrectato) ewsudante.” Mr. Benson describes particularly the habits of the species ob- served by him, which he first discovered living at Banda, in Bun- delkund, on the prone surface of a rock. The animal carries the shell horizontally or nearly so, is quick in its motions, and, like Helicolimax, it crawls the faster when disturbed, instead of retract- ing its tentacles like the Snails in general. In damp weather it is rarely retracted within its shell, the foot being so much swollen by the absorption of moisture that if it is suddenly thrown into boiling water the attempt to withdraw into the shell invariably causes a fracture of the aperture. In dry weather the foot is retracted, and the aperture is then covered by a whitish false operculum similar to that of the other Helicide. The two elongated processes of the mantle are continually in motion, and exude a liquid which lubri- cates the shell, supplying apparently that fine gloss which is obsery- able in all recent specimens. The fluid poured out from the orifice at the base of the caudal horn-hke appendage is of a greenish colour; it exudes when the animal is irritated, and at such times the caudal appendage is directed towards the exciting object in such a manner as to give to the animal a threatening aspect. -_ 78 LAND AND FRESHWATER Of several specimens brought to England by Mr. Benson in 1832 one survived from December 1831, when it was captured in India, until the summer of 1833. The above description we find published again in the Zool. Journal, 1834, vol. vy. p. 458, in a paper entitled “ Conchological Notices, chiefly relating to the Land and Freshwater Shells of the Gangetic Provinces of Hindoostan.” Under genus Nanina, Gray, and in footnote, we find it stated, ‘The peculiar form of the animal of this genus had long since induced me to regard it as constituting a distinct group, to which I had in my MSS. assigned the name of Tanychlamys; on submitting specimens, however, to the Zoological Society at one of its late meetings I find I have been anticipated by Mr. Gray, who had just previously proposed for it the name which I have adopted above.” He says that it is to be found in the Gangetic plain from Calcutta to Cawnpur, that he found it at Banda, in Bundelkund, that he had received it from the hill-fort of Callingar (Kalingar in north of same district), and also from the old fort at Rigmahal (Rajmahal?); he probably then had not noticed the slight differences in the local forms of this shell. In July 1834, one month previous to Benson’s exhibition of the shells at the August meeting of the Zoological Society, Mr. J. E. Gray had described the genus Nanrya, partly from the animals of several species and partly from the animal of a species which had been figured by General Hardwicke in 1797. This figure evidently represents the species common in Calcutta, with the mantle much paler than the rest of the body ; and this he erroneously identified as NV. vitrinoides, Desh., which is a distinct species from the Malay Archipelago, and is Macrochlamys indica, Bs. In the J. A. 8. B. pl. ii. p. 83 (Feb. 1832), Hutton describes the Mizapur shell, MW. petrosa, which he found at Tara, in the low hills near that place, and he gives a good description of the animal of Macrochlamys after the No. 3 Helix, which, in the list of shells at the end, is recorded as “* H. petrosa mihi.”’ He says, ‘‘ dark brown or blackish ; body elongate, with a hooked process on the extremity of the tail pointing backwards.” He mentions the “two narrow, flat, gradually pointed filaments or tentacula, which, when the ani- mal is in motion, are kept constantly playing over the surface of the shell ;” but there is a want of accuracy in the description, for he says they both proceed “from the right side of the animal.” To Hutton therefore, and not to Mr. Gray, belongs the credit, among English naturalists, of having first described this genus and noted the great difference between the European and Asiatic forms of Heliv as then constituted. But in 1829 Desmoulins had examined and described the animal of an Indian species (1. levipes, Miller), to which he gave the sub- generic title ArropHAnTA, from its similarity to Arion in possessing a mucous pore at the extremity of the foot; and he laid great stress on this anatomical point. Now had //. levipes been a dextral shell, with less marked characters of its own, the title Ariophanta MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 79 would include all those Indian species with simple neck-lobes and no tongue-like shell-lobes, which have been hitherto placed in Nanina. H. levipes is, however, a sinistral form, and related to a group all of this character. I do not myself set much value on it, unless it be supported by others. It is certainly very constant in some genera, but very inconstant in others, not affecting the anatomy in one single point; and it would have made classification much simpler had Ariophanta been adopted for all these species until placed in their respective subgeneric positions, restricting it eventually for levipes and its allies; and the subfamily ArropHantrin& would have better distinguished these Asiatic land-shells from the very different and distinct group Zonites of Montfort. Stoliczka adopts the title Macrochlamys in the J. A. 8. B. 1871, pp. 246, 247, and, after going through the record of it, says, “ It is, I think, tolerably clear that under the above name (i. e. indica) the Bengal species, usually recorded as vitrinoides, was meant. Conse- quently this species must be taken as the type of Macrochlamys, whether it be called vitrinoides or indica, for both, if different, are no doubt very closely allied.” In the Journ. Asiat. Soc. Beng. for 1881, p. 131, Mr. G. Nevill enters on the question of the priority of Nanina, Gray, over that of Macrochlamys, Benson, and rather favours the retention of the former in a wide sense, which I think quite unnecessary. The question of priority is not to be settled by Benson having admitted the validity of Gray’s genus over one of his own creation. This an author might do from a modest feeling not to put his own work forward before that of another naturalist; and the editor of the P. Z. 8. at the time appears to have substituted Gray’s title for Benson’s on p. 89, 1834, without reference to previous papers of the latter. This question is to be settled by the writings of the two individuals, and how they can be best interpreted ; 7. e. which of the generic titles is first found in print, and can be best and without any doubt ascribed to a single species also strictly identifiable. Although Benson in 1832 did not give a detailed description of Macrochlamys, yet the species is clearly indicated, and that a genus was necessary to receive it; and this can cause no confusion, for in 1834 he proceeded to publish the same most minutely. Norshould Capt. T. Hutton’s writings be overlooked in the chain of evidence ; that officer and Mr. Benson worked together, corresponded, and exchanged specimens for years about this period *. We find Hutton describing a closely allied species of this genus in February 1832. It is evident throughout that Benson and Hutton had always the same species in view for the type of the genus Macrochlamys, and they knew its characters thoroughly. On the other hand, Gray’s knowledge was superficial, he selected no particular type, and his generic description of Nanina does not apply rigorously to * T possess a large number of pamphlets from different journals, sent by Benson to Hutton, with MS. notes and queries in some of them; these were kindly presented to me by the latter when he gave up collecting. What became of Benson’s own set and his valuable MS. notes I know not. 80 LAND AND FRESHWATER the so-called vitrinotdes of India. Moreover, we find in P. Z. 8. 1847, p. 169, in “ A List of the Genera of Recent Mollusca, their Synonyma, and Types,” Nanina and Macrochlamys are both sub- genera of Stenopus, with citrina and vitrinoides as their respective type shells. Manina should therefore only hold citrina and allied forms, apparently a good subgeneric group; but it certainly should not be used in the wide sense that has been given it by so many authors. The family Zonitidee is sufficient for this ; and when all the species of it are collected into well-characterized genera and subgenera there will be no need for any generic term to include the doubtful species of the group. It is even, I think, preferable to use Helix in its widest sense than to use Vanina for these Asiatic forms. But E. von Martens has condemned the title, and so has Mr. W.'T. Blanford; and I cannot do better than quote what the latter writes (J. A. 8. B. 1880, p. 184) :—** The difficulty is to determine what generic name or names should be adopted. Nanina is utterly bad ; it offends every law; the name had been used previously by Risso *; the type is the same as that of Benson’s genus Macrochlamys; the term is objectionable on account of its signification. All this has been pointed out by von Martens T, but still he and others employ the name because it has crept into use. Now in such difficult matters as these generic terms, unless rules are strictly attended to, utter confusion must result, and undoubtedly it has resulted. When, however, a search is made for a better founded term than Nanina, endless difficulties are encountered.” In December 1848 Mr. H. E. Strickland, F.G.S., described the animal of another species of this genus, published in the P. Z. 8. for that year, p. 142, with two figures (plate xi. figs. 1 and 2); this was obtained in Ajmeer. I give his interesting account in full, for the animal was kept some time alive in this country. He named it vitrinoides, following Gray’s identification in P. Z. 8. 1834, “On the Habits of a Living Specimen of Nanina vitrinoides (Desh.). By H. E. Srricxzanp, F.G.S8. “On the 2nd of December, 1847, Capt. W. J. E. Boys presented the writer three specimens of a terrestrial mollusk, named Nanina vitrinoides by Mr. Gray (P. Z. 8. pt. 2, p. 58, Helix vitrinoides, Desh.). Capt. Boys had procured them a considerable time before, certainly not less than a year, in the district of Ajmeer in Upper India. The animals still remained within the shells; but from the length of time during which they had been kept dry, they were greatly reduced in bulk, and had almost wholly retired from the outer volution, as was easily seen from the transparency of the shell. Like many of the Helicide of hot climates, especially those which are exposed to long intervals of drought, the Nanina vitri- * «J. A.S. B. 1871, p. 47. t ‘Albers, ‘Heliceen,’ 2. Ausgabe, p. 46, where the synonymy is fully dis- cussed.” MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 81 noides secretes a calcareous poma or deciduous operculum every time that it retires into a state of torpor. The specimens in question had formed two or three successive pomata, one within the other, during the process of their desiccation. ** In hopes of restoring their animation, I placed them upon some wet moss in a warm room. ‘Two of them proved to be past re- covery, but the animal of the third was seen through the trans- parent shell to be gradually enlarging in bulk by the absorption of moisture, and at the end of a week it finally reached the door of its dwelling, threw off the poma, and began to crawl. A morsel of boiled carrot was presented to it, which it greedily devoured, and speedily increased in health and vigour. I have now kept this interesting creature a twelvemonth, and have often been tempted to exclaim with Oken, ‘ What majesty is in a creeping snail; what reflection, what earnestness, what timidity, and yet at the same time confidence! surely a snail is an exalted symbol of mind slumbering deeply within itself.’ Since its revival my Na- nina has greatly increased in size, and has added half a volution to its shell, which now measures ;5, inch in diameter. Its favourite food is boiled carrots and raw lettuce-leaves. It generally remains quiet during the day, but crawls forth and shows considerable ac- tivity in the evening, and has never shown any inclination to hyber- nate or become torpid for a lengthened period. The shell of Nanina vitrinoides is brown, glossy, and pellucid, and in shape and colour closely resembles the shells of the European genus Zonites, from which, without examination of the animal, it seems to be generically undistinguishable. The animal, however, is very different, and is more allied to, though quite distinct from, that of the genus Vitrina. The foot when contracted is too large to be withdrawn into the shell, except after a considerable period of desiccation. When ex- panded, and at full stretch, the foot is remarkably long and narrow, measuring about 2 inches in length and + inch in breadth. The hinder extremity is abruptly truncate, surmounted by a short horn- like appendage, similar to that in the larvee of certain Lepidopterous genera. “ But the most peculiar character in the animal of Nanina is that of the two elongate pointed lobes or flaps which project from the margin of the mantle, one on each side of the mouth of the shell. These lobes possess a certain amount of lateral motion and a consi- derable power of retraction and expansion, but are always kept in close contact with the surface of the shell. “The animal is in the frequent habit of performing the following singular operation, which, as far as I am aware, has not before been noticed in any terrestrial mollusk. Crawling to the top of its prison (which consists of an inverted tumbler, with a small aperture for air), it suspends itself to the glass by the hinder half of “the foot, and twists the anterior part round so as to bring its lower surface into contact with the shell. By the great length and flexibility of the anterior half of the foot it is enabled to twist in a variety of directions, and thus to crawl as it were over every part of its own 82 LAND AND FRESHWATER shell in succession, the hind part of the animal remaining all the while firmly attached to the surface of the glass. *‘ During this operation the horns are partially contracted, and the mouth of the animal is applied closely to the shell, and is seen to be alternately expanded and contracted, as if in the act of suction. In fact the whole process resembles the action of a cat when licking its feet and body, and is performed with just the same appearance of systematic determination. The object of this operation is no doubt the same in both animals—that of clearing their person from extraneous matter and producing that aspect of cleanliness and beauty which is one of the laws of organic nature in its normal state. Hence that brilliant gloss which distinguishes the shell of the mollusk here referred to. It would be desirable to ascertain whether any analogous habit is possessed by the allied genera Vi- trina and Zonites. The shells of the British species of Zonites (Z. nitens, alliacea, cellaria, &c.) closely resemble Nanina vitrinoides in form, colour, and glossiness of surface, and their brilliancy must apparently be due to some polishing action similar to that here de- scribed. On the other hand it is difficult to understand how the animals of Zonites and Vitrina, whose foot is much broader and shorter than in Nanina, should be able to reach every part of their shell and purify its surface. “The animal of Nanna vitrinoides is of a deep cinereous, the mantle yellowish, its lateral projecting lobes darker; the under surface of the foot pale grey, with a yellowish stripe along each side.” In November 1849 the above gentleman described the same species in the Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. The size (diameter ;4, inch) and the description of the shell agree well with specimens I have in my col- lection, collected by the late Capt. A. B. Melville at Jeypur, only 80 miles from Ajmeer, and which I shall describe in the next Part under the title of Macrochlamys stricklandi, for it is certainly not the Gangetic delta form. No group of shells can be more difficult to identify than those that have been classed under this genus. The shells of the larger species are so similar in outward form and texture that they are very liable to be mistaken at a cursory glance; however, consider- able differences are to be found when the animals are examined, particularly in the shape and size of the mucous gland at the extre- mity of the foot, and in the mantle, its lobes, and varying tongue- like lubricating processes. I have collected species of this genus for many years over a very large area, extending from the Punjab and Mussoorie in the North- west Provinces to Assam on the north-east frontier, and I was early struck with the very great difference in the colour and form of the animal of those shells to which the majority of Indian conchologists then gave the name of M. vitrinoides. The shells certainly have a very striking similarity, though on a closer examination differences in the form, the increase of whorls, &c. can be detected. It is not surprising therefore that the whole group stands in a considerable MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 83 state of confusion ; and it is to clear this up partially that I have endeavoured to classify them, and distinguish what were the species Hutton, Benson, and others have described and named. Few of these Indian naturalists had the training and skill to examine the anatomy of the animal; only in a few instances do we find the outward form and colour noticed ; the old plan of boiling and getting rid of the animal as soon as possible was followed, and many species were collected in a dead and bleached state, and were thus described. T now regret extremely that when I was in India I also was in perfect ignorance of how to dissect a mollusk ; and it was only after association with Henry and William Blanford and Ferd. Stoliczka that my attention was directed to the outward form of the animal, and I recorded this and made many useful sketches from the living animals, Ferd. Stoliczka was one of the first to take up the internal anatomy of the land Mollusca of India; and he published several very interesting and valuable papers in the ‘ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, which I have already referred to. On commencing with this genus I had to consider what characters I could take or combine to separate on good grounds the very nume- rous species we have in the Kast. As the form of mantle is so widely different, and as this organ, however slightly modified, affects the sculpture of the shell, I began to examine under the microscope, and, using a moderately high power, first the sculpture of as many species as I could get access to. In my own collection I have a vast amount of material, all with the exact localities most carefully re- corded, and which I knew had never got mixed together. Each box or tube was taken in turn, and every shell separately examined and its sculpture recorded in a tabular form. I soon found that the same species from the same locality were all identical with one another and had a certain defined range, while in many instances the structure and arrangement of the epidermal lines of growth were sufficiently marked to distinguish the species even from a small chip. I give drawings of the most characteristic surfaces, magnified and drawn under the camera lucida. This is of course nothing new in the study of shells, for by far the greater number of species can be distinguished by better and more marked characters, and such labour would be thrown away. I only wish to explain here the method I followed before discrimination was made between the different local forms that came before me. I am under great obligation to Mr. Sylvanus Hanley for a similar examination of his fine collection, to Dr. A. Giinther, of the British Museum, and Prof. J. W. Clarke, of Cambridge (where Benson’s collection now rests), and to Mr. G. Nevill for specimens from the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Mr. V. Ball also gave me a large number he had collected at different times. Starting with the sculpture of the shell only as a distinctive cha- racter, I first divided these shells into a number of artificial groups, again subdivided roughly by size and form. JI only anticipated from the first a remote relationship to be shown; but it aided greatly in PART III. I 84 LAND AND FRESHWATER finding and lumping the species together, and gleaning them even- tually out, to be inserted finally in their more natural positions. The next character I turned my attention to was the odontophore. On going over my own collection I found, not having boiled and remoyed the animals save of the very large kinds, that in a number of specimens the animal still remained in a hard dried-up state. Placed in water, not only can the mantle-lobes be distinctly made out, but the buccal mass and, what was of equal importance, the reproductive organs and, in several instances, the spermatophores were secured. I shall give drawings of such parts when describing the different species ; although incomplete as a whole, in many cases I think it will be allowed that they are of considerable value specifically, considering how difficult, almost impossible, it will be for many years to collect some of these shells again. I also possessed a few specimens pre- served in spirit, which have proved of great use. The genitai organs present us with good specific differences ; but, as Stoliczka warns us, they must not be taken as certain evi- dence, at least not until a very great number of examples have been examined at different stages of growth and at different periods of the year; for it can be easily understood that in a soft animal like a mollusk such organs do undergo very great modification and en- large at different parts, and that we should expect to find their con- dition during the period of rest in the cold season different to that during the rains, when they are in their most active state and the process of reproduction going on. These remarks also hold good with respect to the lobes of the mantle, which in moist weather are much more lengthened and expanded. Yet this cannot modify to any great extent the relative position of the different parts or other acces- sory organs. Of small size ; sculpture smooth ; globosely conoid. MaAcrocHLAMYs LONGICAUDA, n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 1.) Locality. Cherra Poongee (H. H. G.-A.). Shell subglobosely conoid, last whorl rather swollen ; no sculpture visible to eye alone, but crossed with very fine raised lines oblique to each other under high power; colour horny brown; spire mode- rately high, sides rather flat; suture shallow; whorls 53, sides slightly convex ; aperture widely lunate; peristome thin, suboblique near axis. Size: major diam. 5°6 mm., alt. axis 3-1 mm. # 0-22inch, ,, 0°12 inch. MacrocHLamys Lonelcaupa, var. (Plate XVII. figs. 2, 2 a.) Locality. Maotherichan Peak, N. Khasi (H. H. G.-A.). Shell globosely turbinate, closely perforate ; sculpture none, sur- face like ground glass; colour pale ochre ; whorls 54, the last sub- angulate at the periphery ; aperture suboblique, narrowly lunate ; Be eiome thin, the columellar margin perpendicular and slightly reflected. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. és 85 Size: major diam. 4:3 mm., alt. axis 3-1 mm. ae O:17fAnchs, “34\e0:42 anche Size of specimen from Maosmai, near Cherra Poongee: major diam. 0°20, alt. axis 0°11 inch. Other localities: Banks of the Mankén, North Jaintia, and Jawai. The dried-up animal being apparent in two of the specimens from Cherra Poongee, these were soaked in water for a few days; and I was rewarded by the form of the animal coming out most distinctly, as shown in the drawings made from it, placing it and the allied forms without doubt in this genus. The right shell-lobe is tongue- like, and the small left lobe is present (Plate XX. fig. 16). The overhanging lobe above the mucous pore at the extremity of the foot (Plate XX. fig. 1) is developed to a great extent; and of this I have the sketch from life in my note-book (fig. 1a) *, together with the following description :—*‘‘ Animal when fully extended 0:45 to 0°5 inch long. Tentacles of full size; body thin, of a light pale colour, with thin line of dark grey on upper surface to the extremity of the foot ; the gland here is large for the size of the animal, and pro- trudes upwards above the level of the back: in fully developed shells the animal is darker about the head.” [also detected the amatorial organ, and the odontophore and jaw are also figured (Plate XX. figs. 1e-le). The former differs very considerably from that of the typical Macrochlamys indica in the smaller number of the median teeth and their elongate form. The laterals have the same bicuspid form; but their number is quite double. Thus in M. longicauda the formula is LO tO.S0 2d. Oh . ome). 1 0,.t0 SU; or 84.1. 84, as against 45 . 1 . 45 in M. indica. The jaw has no central projection, being slightly concave on the cutting-edge. The central tooth is long with convex sides, and with two small denticles on either side low down near the base; the next five are also long and narrow, with a single small tooth on the outer side ; in the sixth and seventh this outer tooth rises and is nearer to the point of the main cusp, and in the eighth and ninth still more so. From the tenth to the outermost all are bicuspid, becoming gradually smaller in size. MacrocuLaMys Lonercaupa, var. (Plate XVII. fig. 4.) Locality. Marangsip Peak, North Cachar Hills (17. H, G.-A.). Shell closely perforate, globosely conoid, rounded below ; sculp- ture none, save a few lines of growth; colour, pale ochraceous epi- dermis ; spire conic, sides flat ; suture moderately impressed ; whorls 5, sides flatly convex ; aperture elongately quadrate ; peristome thin, reflected slightly at axis, and subvertical. * Tn this character it resembles Semper’s genus Macroceras from Samar, one of the Philippines ; but there is no other similarity. 86 LAND AND FRESHWATER Size: major diam, 6-4 mm., alt. axis 3°6 mm. = 0°25 inch,~ ,, 0-14 inch. Not so open at the aperture, and columellar margin straighter and rather more rounded below than in the type. MAcROcHLAMYS NENGLOENSIS, n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 3.) Locality. Nenglo, Naga Hills (H. H. G.-A.). Shell perforate, globosely conoid, somewhat flat on the base, slightly subangulate ; sculpture smooth, with irregular wavy distant ribbing ; colour pale olivaceous green; spire conoid, rather high, sides slightly convex, apex blunt ; suture shallow; whorls 6, regularly increasing, flatly convex; aperture narrowly lunate ; peri- stome thin, oblique to axis on columellar margin, and considerably reflected. Size: ae diam. 5°3 mm., alt. axis 3-1 mm. 0-21 inch, oo O22 inch: This shell is closely allied to MW. longicauda, but is more globose, with more convexity on the side of the spire; the aperture is nar- rowly lunate, and the columellar margin is stronger. This shell I considered at first to be the same as Heliw poongee, Theob., from Moulmain ; but a comparison of specimens from that locality in Mr. W. T. Blanford’s collection shows the sculpture to be very different, and there is considerable difference in size and form. MaAcrocHLaMYs NENGLOENSIS, var. (Plate XVII. fig. 5.) Locality. Munipur (H. H. G.-A.). Shell tumid and rounded below; sculpture none, a few lines of growth, surface like ground glass ; colour pale umber-brown ; spire conoid; whorls 6; aperture semilunate; peristome thin, oblique near axis, scarcely reflected. Size: major diam. 5-1 mm., alt. axis 3:1 mm. 0:20 Hilde 39. 0:12 inch. Principally ‘differs in the aperture being wider, a weaker colu- mellar margin, and not so flat on the base. I obtained a specimen of this species in the Umiam valley near Shillong, which I find described in my note-book as follows :— “ Sculpture none, but the epidermis like roughish paper, crossed with microscopic lines irregularly. “Animal. Length 0°33 inch; tentacles nearly 0:1. Dark greyish brown, and ridge of foot of same colour. Foot beneath white. Body long and tapering, with a mucous pore at the extremity of the foot. Shell of a dull pale-brown colour when containing the living animal. By suddenly contracting its body, the animal can throw itself off the position it may be on, after the manner of Helicarion salius and other species of that genus. MACROCHLAMYS KOLIAENSIS, n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 6.) Locality. Koliaghur, low hills on Brahmaputra, Nowgong District, Assam (H. H. G.-A.). MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 87 Shell, perforation concealed, very globosely conoid, rather swollen below, shining, thin; sculpture qtite smooth, glassy ; colour pale horny ; spire conical, apex rather pointed; whorls 6, body-whorl large, close, and regularly wound, suture adpressed ; aperture flatly lunate, small; peristome thin, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 4°] mm., alt. axis 2°3 mm. a O-l Grinch: = 4,,2 2009 inch. MacrocHLAMYS ROBERTI, n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 7.) Locality. Angauluo Peak, 6777 ft., Burrail range, Naga Hills (W. Robert). Shell narrowly perforate, globosely conoid, rather flat on basal side, polished ; smooth, but transverse lines of growth distinctly marked; colour, pale horny brown epidermis; spire conoid; suture adpressed; whorls 53, the last flattened below ; aperture lunate ; peri- stome thin, oblique and slightly reflected near umbilicus. Size: major diam. 4°1 mm., alt. axis 2°0 mm. me 0°16 inch, ,, 0-08 inch. I name this after one of my assistant surveyors, Mr. W. Robert, who has collected extensively and so successfully for me. MaAcrRocHLAMYS DORANI, n. sp. (Plate X VIL. fig. 8.) Locality. Maotherichan Peak, N. Khasi (H. H. G.-A.). Shell closely umbilicated, globosely conoid ; sculpture quite smooth, with an indication of ribbing ; colour pale umber-brown ; spire low, blunt ; whorls 5, rounded, the first the largest and swollen; aper- ture ovately lunate ; peristome thin. Size: major diam. 3:3 mm., alt. axis 2°3 mm. a O-lS imich,"),°' “O-09rineh. A form very close to M. umbraticola, though much smaller, more globose, and with a less expanded aperture. MacrocHLAMYS TANIRENSIS, n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 9.) Locality. Tanir Peak, 4400 ft., Dafla Hills (1. H. G.-A.). Shell, perforation concealed, globosely conoid, body-whorl large ; sculpture polished, quite smooth ; colour pale sienna-brown ; spire depressedly conoid, apex rounded; whorls 43, regularly increasing, sides slightly convex; aperture vertical, lunate; peristome thin, columellar margin oblique. Size: major diam. 2°8 mm., alt. axis 1-5 mm. u O-d ineh;.” ,. ) 0:06 meh. Two specimens only from above locality. One in Indian Museum, Calcutta. MacrocHiaMys RusticuLa, n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 10.) Locality. North Khasi (H. H. G‘.-A.). Shell minute, very narrowly umbilicated, depressedly conoid, rather solid, shining, subangular ; sculpture quite smooth ; colour sienna- brown; spire rather flat; whorls 4; aperture subvertical, widely lunate ; peristome thickened and very oblique on columellar margin, 88 LAND AND FRESHWATER Size: major diam. 2°3 mm., alt. axis 1-0 mm. “ 0-09 inch, > ,, 0°04 inch. Macrocutamys ? pLantuscuta, Hutton. (Plate XVI. figs. 7, 7 a.) Helix planiuscula, J. A.S.B. March 1838, p. 218; Conch. Ind. p. 15, pl. xxxii. figs. 7-10. Macrochlamys, sec. D, Theob. Cat. p. 19. Original description :—‘‘ Testa parvula, depressa, fusca, polita ; anfractibus quinque, ultimi peripheria rotundata ; apertura transversa. “Diam, 0-1. ‘** Found at Simla on dead leaves. ‘This shell is darker and smaller than H. erystallina of Britain, which has likewise a more flattened apex than the Simla species.” (B.) Helix crystallina, however, belongs to Zonites or Hyalina, Fér., and is not related to this species. There is no authority for placing this shell in the genus Macro- chlamys, and I do so with considerable doubt ; it must take a position at the end of that genus until we know what the animal is like. I found it pretty abundant in the ravines at Mussoorie among dead leaves; the specimen figured is from that place. Size: major diam. 3°3 mm., alt. axis 1*7 mm., of specimen figured. Macrocutamys ? pARJINGENSIS, Nevill, MS., n. sp. (Plate XVII. fig. 11.) Locality. Darjiling (Col. Mainwaring). Shell, perforation hidden, depressedly globose, solid, shining ; surface smooth, with rather regular distant transverse faint ribs ; colour pale horny white; apex flatly rounded; suture adpressed, shallow ; whorls 5, closely wound ; aperture perpendicular, narrowly lunate, with a thin callus on the body-whorl; peristome rather thickened, scarcely reflected at the short columellar margin. Size: major diam. 1°7 mm., alt. axis 0°9 mm. e 0:07 inch, ,, 0°04 inch. Of this distinct and peculiar little shell four specimens were sent me by Mr. G. Nevill. It is difficult to know where to place it ; and it may possibly be a true Helix. MacrocuiaMys ? MoLECULA, Bs. (Plate XVI. fig. 8.) Helix molecula, Benson, Ann. & Mag. N. H. 1859, iii. p. 389 ; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 69; Conch. Ind. pl. xxxii. figs. 8, 9, p. 15. Maerochlamys, sec. E, Theob. Supp. Cat. p. 20. Nanina (Microcystis), Nev. Hand-list, p. 38. no. 162. Locality. Rangoon (Stoliczka). Size of specimen figured : major diam, 4:4 mm., alt. axis 1-9 mm. ms O:l7inch, «5, .. 0°08 meh. Original description :—‘ Testa anguste perforata, conordeo-globosa, tenui, obsolete radiato-striata, nitida, fusco- vel castaneo-corned ; spira conoidea, lateribus convewiusculis, sutura impressa, submarginata, MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 89 apice obtuso ; anfractibus 53 arcte convolutis, convexiusculis, ultimo ad peripheriam rotundato, subtus convexo ; apertura vie obliqua, late lunari, peristomate recto, acuto, margine columellart anguste reflexo. «« Diam. major vix 5, minor 4, axis 3 mill. “‘ Habitat ad Rangoon, satis copiose. “A minute shell, with a more conoid spire and more closely wound whorls than H. causia. It is altogether deficient in the spiral strie which distinguish that species.” Fine, longitudinally striate sculpture ; globosely conoid. MAcROcHLAMYS UMBRATICOLA, 0D. sp. (Plate XIV. figs. 4, 4a.) Locality. Hengdan Peak, North Cachar Hills (H. H. G-A.). Shell, perforation concealed, globosely conoid; sculpture very minute, regular, longitudinal striz ; colour pale olive-brown ; spire low; whorls 43; aperture ovately lunate, suboblique ; peristome rather thickened, very slightly reflected. Size: major diam. 0°17 inch, alt. axis 0°08 inch. é 4-3 mm., af 2-2 mm. This shell was very abundant among the dead leaves in the forest around the above-mentioned peak; I also got single specimens in the Jatinga valley and Kopamedza Peak, 8376 ft., in the Naga Hills. MAcROCHLAMYS PERPAULA, Bs, (Plate XIV. fig. 5.) Helix perpaula, Bs. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1859, i. p. 390; Pfr. Mon. Hel. vol. v. p. 69; Conch. Ind. p. viii (not figured). Nanina (Microcystis), Nevill’s Hand-list, p. 37. no. 156. Locality. Moulmain (Stoliczka). Shell perforate, rounded below, glassy ; sculpture, regular longi- tudinal fine ribbing throughout, crossed by evenly disposed lines of growth, but not decussate ; colour umber-brown ; spire conoid, apex rounded; whorls 4, much rounded ; aperture lunate. Size : major diam. 0-09 inch, alt. axis 0°05 inch. Fe 2:3 mm., Pe 1-3 mm. Original description :—“ Testa perforata, depresso-globosa, oblique striatula, sub epidermide cornea albida ; spira conoideo-convexa, apice obtuso, sutura impressa ; anfractibus 43 sensim crescentibus, convext- usculis, ultimo rotundato, subtus convexo ; apertura obliqua, rotun- dato-lunari, peristomate recto, acuto, margine columellari reflexo, sub- oblique descendente, basalt arcuato. “Diam. major 2, minor 13, axis 11 mill. **‘ Habitat ad Phie Than, raro. “ Allied to H. molecula, but, besides its much smaller size, it is more globose. The single specimen received is much weathered. It is probably translucent and polished when fresh. The spire is less conoid, and the whorls not so closely wound as in H. bullula, Hutton, of the Western Himalaya.” . Nevill gives (J. ¢. p. 37) Parisnath and Darjiling as localities where this shell has been found. These specimens should be again closely compared with typical examples. 90 LAND AND FRESHWATER MacrocHiamys ? KANDIENSIS, Ney. MS8.,n. sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 2.) Locality. Kandy, Ceylon. Shell perforate, globosely conoid; sculpture fine, regular, rather distant, longitudinal striz or grooving, the surface of the shell much decomposed in patches, giving it a mottled appearance ; colour dark chestnut-brown ; spire subdepressedly conoid, sides rather rounded ; suture well marked; whorls 5, the last well rounded; aperture oblique, ovately lunate; peristome thin, slightly reflected on the columellar side. Size: major diam. 0°16 inch, alt. axis 0-09 inch. 4-1 mm., me 2°3 mm. Nevill remarks that it is near M. stephoides, Stol., from Penang Hill ; but it has a very different form from the figure 9 in the J. A. 8. B. 1873, pl. 1. Macrocatamys PoonGEE, Theobald. (Plate XIV. fig. 1.) Macrochlamys poongee, Theob. J. A. S. B. 1859, vol. xxviii. p. 307. Helix poongee, Conch. Ind. pl. xvi. fig. 9, p. 8 (gives the idea of a shell with a thickened peristome). Macrochlamys poong?t (sec. D), Theob. Supp. Cat. p. 19. Nanina (Microcystis) poongee, Nev. Hand-list, p. 38. no. 159. Locality. Moulmain (Stoliczka). Sculpture microscopic, close, longitudinal striation, hardly visible on the apical whorls; colour rich brown. Original description :—* Testa turbinate conoidea, tenui, apice de- pressiusculo, anguste umbilicata, tumida, fusco-cornea; anfract. 63 convexis ; apertura rotunde lunari ; perist. recto, acuto. “ Diam. 0:26, alt. 0°20 inch. A thin brown Helix, somewhat resembling the small //. molecula, but with a more elevated spire, which, however, varies a little in different species.” Size: ig diam. 5°4 mm., alt. axis 3°8 mm. O21. “tasitu m 0-15 inch. Nevill gives "also Cherra Poongee and Naga Hills as the habitat of this species, from specimens sent by Mr. Chennell and myself to the Calcutta Museum: these are M. longicauda and M. nengloensis of my collection, which originally were considered to be H. poongee. The sculpture and colour are quite distinct. Macrocuiamys PACATA, n.sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 10.) Locality. Lhota Naga Hills (A. Chennell). Shell depressedly conoid, thin, smooth, and glassy ; sculpture fine regular and somewhat distant lines of longitudinal strie ; colour sienna-brown ; spire low, rather flat; suture adpressed ; whorls 42 , last largest and tumid below, regularly i increasing; aperture ovately fae : peristome thin, columellar margin perpendicular and reflected. Not fully grown. Size: major diam. 0-11 inch, alt. axis 0-05 inch. Ps 2°8 mm., ss 1:3 mm. MacrocuLamys Fraceta,n. sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 7.) Locality. Dikrang valley, Dafla Hills (/7. H. G‘.-A.). MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 91 Shell globosely conoid, scarcely perforate; sculpture fine, close, regular longitudinal furrowing ; colour ochraceous ; spire subconoid, sides flat; suture adpressed; whorls 4, convex, the last tumid; aperture subvertical, ovately lunate; peristome thin, columella weak, subvertical. Size: major diam. 2°7 mm., alt. axis 1-4 mm. 4 O-bincehy ~ ;, 0-06 inch. This shell is somewhat of the form of wmbraticola, but is much smaller and the whorls not so rounded and globose as in that shell. MAcrocHLAMYs ENATA, n. sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 11.) Locality. Lhota Naga Hills (Chennell). Shell globosely conoid, thin, transparent; sculpture fine, very regular longitudinal striw, glassy to the eye alone; colour pale sienna-brown ; spire moderately high, conic, blunt ; suture shallow ; whorls 43, regularly increasing; aperture oval, subvertical; peri- stome thin, perpendicular at the columellar margin, Size: major diam, 2-4 mm., alt. axis 1-1 mm. “ 0:10 inch, ,, 0:04 inch. MAcRocHLAMYS ORIGINARIA, n. sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 12.) Locality. Munipur (H. H. G.-A.). Shell perforate, globosely conoid, glassy, rather solid, and rounded below ; sculpture fine regular longitudinal striation; colour sienna- brown; spire moderately conoid, the side convex; suture shallow; whorls 43, the last with a tendency to subangulation; aperture ovate, subvertical ; peristome thin, suboblique. Size: major diam. 2°5 mm., alt. axis 1:5 mm. ms 0-10 inch, ,, 0:06 inch. MacrocHLaMYs SATA, n. sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 13.) Locality. Shenghor Peak, 6706 feet, Dafla Hills (coll. Indian Mu- seum), one specimen; Toruputu Peak, 7322 feet, Dafla Hills, one specimen (/. H. G‘.-A.). Shell depressedly conoid, very small ; sculpture microscopic regular lines of striz, crossed transversely with other striation; colour pale olivaceous grey, mottled black, with shining lustre; spire flat ; suture impressed; whorls 4, sides flatly convex; aperture lunate ; peristome oblique below from columellar margin. Size: major diam. 2°0 mm., alt. axis 0-8 mm. ee O08 amehiiw 135 0-03 inch. MacrocHLaMys? ANoN#H, n. sp. (Plate XIV. fig. 8.) Janina (Microcystis), n. sp., Ney. Hand-list, p. 38. no. 163 (found on fruits of the custard-apple). Locality. Calcutta (G. Nevill and J. Wood-Mason). Shell narrowly perforate, subdepressedly conoid, covered with a rough limy deposit; sculpture indistinct longitudinal fine ribbing, PART III, K 92 LAND AND FRESHWATER with a few transverse ridges of growth; colour umber-brown ; spire subconoid, sides flat; suture shallow; whorls 4, the last rounded below and somewhat compressed towards the aperture; aperture oblique, laterally lunate; peristome somewhat thickened, oblique on columellar margin. Size: major diam. 0:06 inch, alt. axis 0°03 inch. a 1-5 mm., a5 0-08 mm. This very minute species, the generic position of which is very uncertain, and which it would be interesting to examine in a living state, I place in the above genus with doubt. It was sent me by Mr. G. Nevill, with the title ? peliosanthi, Morch; but the descrip- tion does not agree. Helix (Kaliella) peliosanthi, Morch, Videnskabelige Meddelelser, 1872, p. 13. Original description :—“ 7’. minutissima, trochiformis, obtecte perforata ; anfr. 443, medio angulati, spiraliter lineati ; linew inere- menti eapresse, regulariter remote ; anfr. ultimus bicarinatus, basi plana nitida, umbilico anguste obliquo. Epidermis tenuissima, in carinis ciliata. Apertura rhombea, columella subdentata. “Diam. 1,4, mm., alt. 1+ mm. “Paa Bladene af Peliosanthes teta fra Haven i Calcutta. (Dr. Didrichsen). Maa veere nermest beslegtet med Nanina (Kaliella) conulus, Blanford (Contrib., Pfr. Mgr. v. p. 90) men de to kjéle ere forsynede med meget grove Cilier, og untersiden er aldeles flad ; ligeledes er den nye Art meget mindre.” I hope to obtain this from Copenhagen, and give a figure of it. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIII. Fig. 1, la. Sitala intonsa, G.-A., X 7. Khasi Hills. 1 }. Ditto: sculpture, x 50. 2. Sitala crenicincta, G.-A., X 12. Khasi Hills. 3: Ditto,