Godwin- Austin Land and Freshwater Mollusca of India. Vol.3 part 1 (text and plates) LAMD AND FRESHWATER MOELUSCA OP INDIA, INCLUDING ' SOUTH ARABIA, BALUCHISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, KASHMIE, NEPAL. BUEMAH," PEaU, TENASSERIM, MALAY PENINSULA, CEYLON, AND OTHER ISLANDS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN. _„ SUPPLEMENTARY TO MESSRS. THEOBALD AND HANLEY'S CONCHO I^OGIA INDICA. BY LiEUT.-CoLONEL H. H. GODWIN- AUSTEN, F.K.S., RK.&.S., F.Z.S., &c., LATR DEPUTy SUPERINTENDENT TOPOGBAPHICAL SBnVEY OP IMDIA, IN CHARGE OP THK KHASr, GAF.O, AND NAGA-HILLS SURVEY PARTY. Vol. III. Part I — NOVEMBER 1920. LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 1920. LAP AND FRESHWATER MOLLUSCA OF INDIA, INCLUDING SOUTH ARABIA, BALUCHISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, KASHMIR, NEPAL, BURMAH, PEaU, TENASSERIM. MALAY PENINSULA, CEYLON, AND OTHER ISLANDS OP THE INDIAN OCEAN. SUPPLEIVIENTARY TO MESSRS. THEOBALD AND HANLEY'S CONCHOLOGIA INDICA. BY LiEUT.-CoLONEL H. H. GODWIN-AUSTEN, F.R.S., F.R.G.S., F.Z.S., &c., LATE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, IN CHARGE OP THE KIIASI, GARO, AND NAGA-IIILLS SURVEY PARTY. ^^ Vol. III. , lAXx^ ^ ^/ \ A Part I.— NOVEMBER 1920. LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 19:20. PRINTED BY TATLOK AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. LAND AND FliESHWATER MOLLUSOA OP INDIA VOL. III. Part I,— NOVEMBER 1920. (Plates CLIX.-CLXV.) INTRODUCTION. In spite of the very limited interest which is taken in the auimals of the land moUusca, I am induced to commence Volume 111. of this work ; for until the species in the many Oriental genera are collected, their anatomy made known, and their true habitat recorded, any attempt to use them for classification or any deeper research is not possible. The work of the Conchologist is simply useless unless this is done and the physical features of India are taken into account. During the war I have uot been able to carry on this publication, begun 37 years ago and ended in two volumes in l'JI4. On the other hand, I have had leisure to do much with the material in my hands, and to add to it, especially specimens preserved in spirit, and have described the auimals of many Indian Genera previously unknown. I have had much support — more than I had hoped to receive — and from many quarters : for this I cannot express my thanks too strongl}". I must especially notice Dr. N. Anuandale, with Messrs. S. W. Kemp and F. H. Graveley of the Indian Museum. 1 feel it a duty to those who have supplied material, to put what I have brought to light on record, as a starting-point for those who will follow me in this wide and difficult field of research, so full of deep interest to anyone who enters it. PAllX I. B I LAND AKB FEESHWATER I am most fortunate in having as a neighbour ilr. J. S. Gladstone, an excelleut and skilful photographer. Without, his valued aid 1 could not give the figures of tjpes and shells from typical localities, which show far better than any de8cri])tion the direction their subtle ditf'erences take. For instance, how distinctly jihoto- grapliy shows the difference between y. lenui.^jiirn of Teria Ghat (I'late CLIX. fig. 3) and the species for long regarded as the same from Sikhim (I'late CLIX. figs. 1 & 2). Mr. Gladstone made jihotographs of 60 shells, which fill three Plates. 1 may say here, but for this generous assistance, the publication of this Jlonograph would not have been possible. As an example of Zoological liesearch it has been met, and by private means alone. Genus Glesscla. While I have been studying this genus, particularly the animal, as specimens were slowly obtained in spirit, knowledge of its taxonomy has increased. Tliis has led me to look at many species very closely, for much had been left iucomjdete by Colonel Eeddome, particularly the species from the North-East Frontier of India, of which I possessed a very fine series. Some of this work on the genus Olessula might have been published long ago in the second volume of the ' Fauna of British India' — some of it, anatomical, had been done ready for it: but I found 1 could not, under the conditions in which I was expected to work, complete it in time. I had reached an age when extra correspondence was to be avoided, when indejjendeiit con- chological work was pleasanter to do. It was not to be expected I could place m}' collection at the service of others, neither could I hand over original work on the animals of the genus on which I had spent so much time and expense during many years. I could not give the public the run of collections I had deposited in the Natural History Museum under certain well-defined and very reasonable conditions, reserving to myself the right to work on them during my lifetime. At the end of Vol. II. (p. 435) I mentioned the genera I was engaged upon and trusted to deal with. Of these Glessttla has been completed and is now presented in Part I. of this new volume. The anatomy of several species has been made known, and, when working out the collections made w hen the punitive expedition entered the Abor country and the Tsanspu Valley (1911-12), I took the opportunity of publishing the anatomy of a new species from Sikhim to elucidate that of the genus, as I did not see at the time, with the war going on, anj- chance of piil)lishing it at all. The animals of other genera have come to hand and have been described and figured in the following Mf1I.I,TJSr\ OF INDIA. 6 order : —An'idi'nris and Opeits (both ver}- well reprcsontcd in my eullection), Sivelhi, JIarpahis, I'lan.ispira, and PlectotrDpis (many species have been worked out iu these four genera). Among the earlier writers on Glessula — I'tcid'or, Bensoii, aiid both Henry and William Blanford — Geoffrey Nevill undoubtedly has the highest claim to notice ; he had made a special study of the genus, and knew it better than anyone I have come in contact with. Much of Eeddome's knowledge was obtained from him in correspondence and exchange of specimens from Southern India. This is well shown in his copy of the ' Hand-List,' being a catalogue of all the Gastero])oda in the Indian Museum when his health compelled him to retire. This is not a mere reprint of the first original edition of 1878 containing 338 pages, but there is added to every sjiecies the work in which it was originally j)ublished ; all additional species (in this genus 1!8} are given with descriptions of those Nevill considered new, while in hundreds of cases throughout the book the dimensions of type shells are given. One point which must not be forgotten is Nevill's great accuraoj- in the records of habitat and the collectors through whom the species were obtained. The title-page is headed " Proof for new Edition," "For the Trustees Indian Museum — G. Nevill, 1-11-81." On another page, " To be offered to Trustees Indian Museum if they consider it may be of any practical value to them ; if not, to bo given to Col. Godwin-Austen. — Signed, G'. Nevill, London, July 5tli, 1879." Shortly after Nevill's death at Davos in Switzerland, I received the copy with other books and valuable notes, and did all I could to get it published. On 23rd December, 1885, I first approached the Trustees of the Indian Museum, strongly advising the publication of a Second Edition ; in February 1886 I received a reply from the Honorary Secretary, Mr. H. B. Medlicott, of which this is the concluding paragraph : " The Trustees consent to your keeping present custody of and using the valuable copy of the Hand-list of Mollusea con- taining Mr. Nevill's notes and additions. There is no immediate prospect of special work in that branch of the collections." In fact, the post which Nevill held has never been filled up to this day : for 40 years the collections of Mollusea have been in many hands, and in the course of many moves some species catalogued by Nevill could not be found when I have applied for them. It says much for those who have had charge that the collection is not in a worse state. I next took the book to Dr. John Anderson, the retired Super- intendent of the India Museum, under whom Nevill had served. He could effect nothing, although, if I remember right, he went to the India Office : it was the old story — no funds ! In 188i, in a final attempt to see it through the press myself, I obtained from Messrs. Taylor & Francis an estimate for (572 pages, 500 copies unbound, ^221 10s. Gd. This sum was not to be got — I had it not to give, but would have given what knowledge 1 had towards publication. B 2 I AND AND FRKSn WATER Much has hitel)' ap[)eared in the public press on " llesearch." It' is of interest to put a case like this ou record (if only to show how valuable scientific work and knowledge is lost for ever for want of Government support.) To show how research is valued and rewarded, Museums are built at an enormous known cost and filled with specimens at an enormous unknown cost; then a proper scientific Staff to deal with them is grudged, expenses are cut down, and the record is never utilized. In this instance Nevill lost the credit which many years of close study should have brought him — not among those he had worked with, but among the general public. I am glad I have the opportunity of bringing his labours to notice. The best account of the genus is to be found in the ' Manual of Conchology,' ser. 2, xx. 1908, commencing p. 50 — the excellent work of Dr. Henry A. Filsbry, with copious good illustrations, not only of the shells, but of the sculpture and of the embryonic apex. He says (p. 52) : — " From the purely conchological standpoint we may be said to have an extensive knowledge of Ghssula, j'ct various characters of the first importance have been neglected. The emhryonic whorls of the tifjies must be all re-e.ramined, and their sculpture described. Our ignorance of the embryonic sculpture of many forms prevents any natural classification of the species. The surface of the later whorls in all the species should be examined under high power, since some species have a minute sculpture not visible with an ordinary lens." Further on, he adds : " No natural classification of the species of Olessula can be attempted until the sculpture of the apices of the shells and the anatomy of a number of representative species are studied." Bearing this truly excellent advice in mind, I have endeavoured to follow it when describing the many species of the genus now known from the Eastern Frontier of India and Burma. Pilsbry* has given a good ri'sume of what has been done in this genus and all that was known of the anatomy at that time. For this last we are indebted to the research of Professor C. Semper, who published, in his ' lleisen im Archipel der rhili])pinen," 1873, p. 133, pi. xii. figs. 14-16 to pi. xvi. fig. 10, an anatomical descrip- tion of Glessula orophila, Benson, said to have come from Madras, but it might have been collected in any part of Peninsular India. It is unfortunate Semper 's determination is open to doubt : we shall never know whether the shell of the animal he dissected was compared with the type of Benson's oropldla, or what has become of that type described by Kecve. The species is not recorded in the ' C'onchologia Indica,' so Hanley never could have seen it. There are no specimens assigned to G. orophila in either the William or Henry Blanford collections. Beddorae records the species from the Anamullay Hills; South Canara ; Goleonda Hills, east side of the Madras Presidency, and says, " IMy Goleonda sjiecimons were labelled by H. Nevill G. suhbrevis, but I cannot see how they * Man. Concli. ser. 2, xx. 190S, pi. xviii. MOT.LUSCA OF INDTV. fliffer.'' Nevill, I think, only saw young examples ; Eeeve's figure copied by Nevill (i. e. G. Nevill), is good. Geoffrey Nevill, in a paper on new or little-known MoUusca of the Indo-Malayan Fauna *, gives a description of the shell. He writes, under Stenogyra (Olessula) orophila, Benson MS.: — " Reeve, Conch. Icon. 1850, fig. 105, anfr. 7, long. 14 mill., as Achatinii orophila, Nilgiris and Colombo ; Jide Pfr., = his A. eeylanica. I give a copy of Keeve's original magnified figure" of his A. orophila, as I am by no means convinced Dr. Pfeifi'er is right in uniting it to his A. ceiflanica ; to judge from the figures, I should say they were quite distinct species. It may be that Eeeve confused two distinct forms — the one figured (probably from the Nilgiris) a good and distinct species, the other from Ceylon a mere variety of St. eeylanica which may have been sent or shown to Dr. PfeifFer as A. orophila and caused him to unite the two species. I have not myself seen any species of the group, St. nitens, eei/lanica, punctogallana, etc., from Continental India." Semper shows all the interesting details of the genitalia of his O. orophila, especially what he terms the flagellum, which is of very peculiar form, elongate and comb-like, a character thus typical of the genus. It is, I consider, the sac in which the spermatophore is developed. In the teeth of the radula the shape of the marginals is not given. The genus, as recently as 1914, has been treated by Mr. G. K. Gude in the 'Fauna of British India.' He approached it with a great knowledge of conchology, bibliography, and especially synonymy — the last most useful to workers, but unattractive. They have to thank Mr. Gude for undertaking such labour. It shows, like so much work of its kind and of the series to which it belongs, that he had never been a collector in India and knew little of its physical features and all that that comprises. There is an absence of original matter, such as Dr. Jerdon, the Blanfords, Lydekker, Oates, Day, and others brought to bear on and embellished the history of the Mammals, Birds, and Fishes of India which they had collected and which had passed through their hands. It is easy to find fault, and it may appear I do so with Gude's work. I am only animated by the desire and striving to make the record of Geographical Distribution as correct as possible ; thus under O. tennispira, p. 379, 1 notice all the errors of determination which Blanford, Theobald, Nevill, Beddome, and myself have per- petuated. I have to point out that these determinations were made 40 to 60 years ago, much too long ago for such data to be reliable. I am able to say they were often made without sufficient material at hand, or on shells erroneously named in the first instance. I tnke, for example, O. baculiiut, p. 379, Khasi Hills {Godwin- Avsten), evidently on the authority of Nevill in the '• Hand-list,' p. 170. It is a distinct species, which he did not notice ; I have named » J. A. S. B. pt. i, 1881. p. 137, pi. V. fig. 19. () LAND ANll FRKSllWATER it suhhandhiu, for I ciinnot find in my collection from the Ktiasi Hills any Ulesmla that matches the type in the Henry Bluiiford collection. Classification and Distribution. Mr. G. K. Gude, in the ' Fauna of British India,' puts Glessida into the family Ferussacid;e (p. 373), immediately following the genera CaceUoides, type acicidu, Miill., Geostdhia, type ailedonica. Crosse, and balamts, lleeve, together with a new species, O. bensoni (p. 375). With these genera I cannot agree that Glessnla has affinity ; the animals are unknown, the shells very different, the conditions of life and extent of range very distinct, liange is an important factor in questions of this kind. C acicida is I'alroarctic, spreading to the far South. Glessula is Oriental and in comparison limited in its area of distrihurion. Commencing with Southern India, it is absent from the N.W. Himala\a, bordering on the eastern margin of the Paliearctic, coming in (in Nepal?) in Sikliim and extending through the North-East Himalaya, Assam with the Assam Range, and thence to Burma, Cliina, "and Sumatra. AH these are forest-ciad countries with considerable rainfall, or country which was once much more forest-clad than at present, before man arrived to destroy the ancient forests. The Khasia Hills, with the Jaintia on the East, were once much more wooded than they are at present and formed a tract of country of great extent. Geast Viia balanns, on the other hand, may be called a desert species, standing great heat and great dryness for months. A knowledge of the animal would be of extreme value in every way. I cannot find that it has ever been seen alive. I ])refer to place Glessula and its subgenera in a family of its own, the Glessulidse. Conchologically Glessula possesses many very distinct characters. It comprises shells which have the coluniellar margin abruptly trun- cate at the base, which in the majority of the species forms a short gutter and holds a jiart of the mantle near the right dorsal margin. A well-defined division with shells of all sizes is found having elongate, turi-eted, and flat-sided shells, the major diameter dilfering little from that of the small aperture. Typical Bacilhim ciissiaca falls under the above shell description, and I shall have to refer to this subgenus — it is much more solid and opaipie, with stronger regular sculpture and larger apex ; the animal (December 1919) still remains to be described. A departure from the Bacilhim type of shell character is met with in Glessula tenuispira (Plate CLIX. fig. 3) ; the shell is thin, transparent, more or less finely striate, the aperture larger, and that and the body-whorl together are much larger than the shorter spire above. This proportion of parts is intensified in species like Plate CLX. fig. 1 hurmihnsis, fig. 2 do., fig. 3 do., fig. 4 do., fig. 5 var. maxwelli ; stUl more in fig. fi batlcri, fig. 14 crassilabris, or what may be MOLLtJSCA OF INDIA. / accepted as true Olessida. The animal of Glessula ochracea, G.-A., of Sikhim, has been dissected and published in ' llecords iudiaa Museum,' vol. viii. pt. xii. p. 617. It was found to agree with G. oroiihila as described by Semper. Until many of the smaller species are anatomically examined, they must all be placed in Glessula ; the smallest species, such as G. geimna. may possibly have characters ot subgeneric value. The classification as given in « Fauna British India,' vol. ii. (vide Systematic Index, p. x) requires modification. Bncilhim is placed in the Achatinidie subfamily Steiioi/i/rince, whereas Glessula is put in the Family Ferrusacidoe Genus 3. I can tind very little difference between the animals of Glessula and Bacillum (January ]9:;0), and consider the first should come next the other ia the Stenogynnce. Conch. Ind. p. 17, " the subgenus Bacillum is proposed by Mr. Theobald for this {A. olAusa, Blf.), the preceding {A. cassiaca, Bs.), and other allied forms." It was lelt to Mr. Henry A. Pilsbry to describe the Genus couchologically, which be does in Man. Conch, ser. 2, xviii. lyuG, p. 1, as follows. Ho mentions 4 species and L sulispecies. Bacillum. — " Shell rather large, solid, imperforate, turreted, niany-whorled, a little contracted near the obtuse, rounded summit; the embryonic shell cylindric ; sculiiture of vertical rib-strise beginning somewhere upon the first whorl (PI. i. fig. 12) ; the post- embryonic whorls being obliquely, regularly nb-striate. Aperture oblique, Achatinoid, the columellar concave, truncate at the base, outer lip simple. Internal axis slender, strongly sigmoid within each whorl. Soft anatomy unlsnown. " Type, B. cassiacum. Distribution, Eastern India." The very recent and extended knowledge of the animals of Bacillum and Glessula shows that the two genera come next each other ; further, that the animals of the latter present two very distinct divisions. This was first seen on dissecting a well-known species from Darjiling and Sikhim long known as G. tenuispira in early Catalogues, such as ^Nevill's ' Hand-list.' The specimens dissected came from the Kishelchu, a tributary of the Teesta, and the anatomy is figured on Plate CLXV. figs. 1-1 c. On this I found a new Subgenus, with the following characters: — ■ Subgenus Eishetia, nov. Shell large, thin, transparent, imperforate, turreted, many- whorled, tapering gradually to a rather acute embryonic apex, first 2 whorls smooth ; sculpture regular, rather coarse striation. Aperture oblique, columellar concave, truncate at base. Animal. Uvotestis tightly convoluted, close to the albumen gland. Prostate and oviduct compact cylindrical, with closely- packed follicles. Spermatheca large on long duct. Penis with a distinct simple gland or flagellum retractor muscle on side. It is also apparent, with the gradually accumulating knowledge of the animal combined with form of the shell, the genus Glessula admits of subdivision — Glessula as a subgenus to include all those O I.ANB AND FRESHWATEK sjiecies possessiiip; the comb-]il;e ii])])eiK]ag;e to the penis (flagellum). Unfortunately, up to date l!M!i the animal of a true Bai-ilhim has never been obtained, never even seen alive. Still 1 am inelinid to think this genus comes in close to Glessuhi, in fact far closer than does Curvella or Baiyalus. The comb-like flagellum (PI. CLXV. fig. 2 c) is replaced by a short, pointed, simple one (PI. CLXV. tig. 1 a), while in a Ceylon species it is massive, with an in- distinctly tripartite outline (PL CLXV. fig. 7 «,/.). Distribution. — The absence of Glessiila in the North-West Himalaya and the Punjab is very remarkable, viz. from all the old valleys of the Punjab Rivers and the Ganges. Whether this feature extends to the Kali River and through Nepal to its eastern boundary, the valley of the Tambur, which Sir Joseph Hooker was the first to explore and describe, has to be discovered when that country becomes better known and is collected in. The only exception to the above distribution is the reported occurrence of one species, 0. hmieVi Pfr. in Kashmir. I have never seen or heard of its being found there ; I was always collecting, and no man in my time saw so much of Kashmir Territory than I did. 1 am incliued to be sceptical, for Kashmir has been fairly collected in by zoologists such as Stoliczka and Theobald, who were not likely to miss finding so large and conspicuous a shell, 37 mm. in length. Mr. Gude says (p. 3S7) : — "When first described, its origin was unknown. Kashmir was first given as its habitat by Hanley and Theobald. The species is allied to Glessula cliessoni, but more solid iu texture. The Cuming Collection contains throe specimens from Kashmir, with a label in Pfeifter's hand-wriiing." It is, moreover, on the authority of Hanley and Theobald, Conch. Indica, p. 33 ; this means " Hanley," who had little regai'd for Geographical distribution. I saw a good deal of Hanley about 1869. He never grasped the enormous size of India : how different is the climate on its north and south, its vast plains and mountains. Consequently I am led to think, on learning that von Hiigel had visited Kashmir, any shell con- nected with him Hanley assumed from that i)art of India. With Eastern Nepal a great change takes place in the orography of the Himalays ; the most elevated peaks, Mt. Everest among them, lie parallel to the plains at about 80 miles distant, and a chain glaciated and covered with snow is continuous for 500 miles as far as the Kali River. This must affect, even at the present day, the temperature of the valley's draining to the plains, and surely wiuild have sufficed during the Glacial period to limit the Land Mollusca to the base of the hills, from which many species would never have returned or survived the change. It produced con- ditions thus far to the East similar, but on a small scale, to the disturbance of the fauna and flora in Europe caused by intense cold. Proceeding to the N.W. to the latitude of Kashmir, these conditions would have been intensified, for enormous glaciers 40 miles long once filled the main valleys. The genus rangts all over Peninsular India, is more abundant MOLLUSC A or INDIA. » in the South, extending to Ceylon, a few species being found common on both sides. It has been studied by H. A. PiLsbry, who cites 58 species ; G. K. Gude, in Paun. Erit. India, raised the number to 80; Colonel R. H. Beddome (1906) gives 53; while Nevill in his Proof Copy ' Hand-list ' (1881) records 65. The species are very distinct ; none are found outside the Peninsula, as far as my investigations go, and I have been able to correct several incorrect determinations. The subgenus Rishetia docs not extend to South India, appa- rently. Ueddome has recorded B. t<'vuispi.i-n from North Canara, based only on a single specimen without any history: see what I say of this under the title of Jowjisjnra No. 2, Sikhim and the Teesta valley. Going back in time, it has not been recorded from the Inter- trappean beds of the Peninsula — -those of Nagpur, for instance ; but I see no reason why it should not be found in them, especially the smaller species, and it should be looked for. We do not half know the genera preserved in this old formation *. The llev. Stephen Hislop, in the ' Proceedings ' of the Geological Society, 1859, p. 154, describes the "Tertiary Deposits associated with Trap-liock in the East Indies," and the fossil shells are described and figured by him. Having very recently received through Dr. N. Annandale a collection of these fossils from Nagpur, I have been led to read the paper. An interesting paragraph I quote from is on p. 164: — " I have shown my frceliwater shells to Mr. Benson, the highest authority on the Molluscs of our Indian lakes, and he gives it as his opinion that not one of the specimens submitted to him exactly corre8])onds to anything he has seen." This was written 60 years ago ; it is in accordance with my conclusions expressed in a letter to Dr. Annandale dated 31st March, 1920: "I have had an hour's look at them, and can say they are all unknown forms to me." This rich fauna of Upper Cretaceous age should no longer lie thus neglected, for since Hislop wrote an enormous advance has been made in our knowledge and treatment of the Land and I'reshwater Mollusca. "The Zoological Results of the Abor Expedition, 1911-12." published in the ' Records Indian Museum,' vol. viii., have con- siderably modified our ideas of distribution and led to the records of the past (nearly forgotten ) being looked up. It points to a migration of moUuscau life from the far South. Perhaps no moi'e interesting history can be recalled than my finding on Shengorh Peak, 7000 feet, in the Diitla Hills, a species I named and described as Staffordia daflaensis, Moll. Ind. pt. x. April 1907, p. 184, pi. cxiii. In expectation of receiving other material, I did not refer to my description of Biakia striata, var., from Siam, in Proc. Malacolog. Society, vol. vii. pt. 2, p. 93, pi. x. June 1906. There is no doubt * In a paper on some Fresljwater Fossils from Central South Africa (Annals & Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. v. Jlaroh 1920) Mr. R, Bidlen Newton on p. 246 refers to certain species in the Nagpur beds. Also my contribution in " Records of two Indian Museums" 1919, Oct. vol. xvi. pt. vi. on the genus Mysorellu of Southern India, pointing out the uecessUy for their generic revisiou. 10 LAND AND FRESHWATER as to the close relationship, especially shown in the genitalia. Diakia did not occur among the Abor coUeetions, unless it shall eventually turn out that Bensonia{'i) ahoreiisis, Eec. lud. Mus. vol. viii. p. 596 (text-fig. 1), has similar anatomy. In slioll character it is unlike that of any Indian Ueuus I have seen ; but 1 had only one specimen to deal with. For a knowledge of the peculiar anatomy of Dicikia, we have to go to Semper, where he deals with what was then known as Ai-iujjhania riimpliii in lleisen, pi. iii. tig. 18. rurt'(/uttatri, var. Sj'arsa „ „ tig. 17. nemo''e,i-:is ,, ,, tig. 19. striata, Gra,\ ^naiiinoides, I3s. „ tig. -!i a-h. He gives heautilul figures of the genitalia, so unlike those of any strictly Indian Genus. Our knowledge of the Assam Land MoUusca is very imperfect ; much has still to be dime, with small chance of our knowing more under present conditions. In fact, discovery of species of great interest is sheer luck ; unless the conditions are exceedingly good, perfect ia fact, nothing is found. To e.xemiilify this, I will give an experience of my own when in the Dafia Hills. Shengorh Peak was one of my Trigonometrical Stations, and I had to clear tlie forest hefore 1 could commence observations, llain set in soon after pitching cam-]) ; so I had plenty of leisure to collect in Natural History. The wet brought out the shells ami slug-like forms, and I had a husy time making drawings and taking lujtes of colour and size. I secured what in drier weather 1 should never have got, certainly not alive ; among them was this unique Genus Staff'onMa, whose neaiest relative known to us is found at Cliantaboon in Siam. It doubtless occurs at many intermediate jilaces which have yet to be discovered, when its possible ancient connection with Assam may be explained. This is the history of a visit to one high point, one which over- looked the great broad valley of the Subansiri, extending far hack to the base of the snowy range, away to hundreds of peaks covered with primeval torest. The imagination fails to picture what the result of exploration would be, combined with knowledge of how and what to collect. In these solitudes Nature reigns supreme ; one does not often find such a spot — seldom visited by man, never lived in by him. The birds on this Peak were fearless. I was quite struck by the behaviour of a beautiful little SutJwra, which kept hovering about my head and would jjerch on a twig a yard from :ny face. Starting with Sikhim and the valley of the Teesta, where species are numerous, I t ike in succession going eastward the great valleys of the Eastern Himalaya to the Erahmaputra, they go far back ill geological time — are older, in fact, than the Sivaliks, for down their courses all the waste of the Himalaya has passed either to the sea, as in the case of the Teesta, or to build up the above formation. The vast thickness of these Tertiary rocks, originally deposited not far above sea-level, the basement beds being even marine, as near Samaguting, is well seen on the .Vssam Range south of the Brahma- JOLL0SOA or INDIA. 11 pntra, where they are elevated to 10,(100 feet in the Patkai and Naga Hills. In the Garo Hills this dimislien to 3000 feet, hut they are there in force with a thickness of some 5000-fiOOO feet : vide 'Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal,' vol. xsxviii. pt. 2, no. 1, 1869, with a Geological Map of a portion of the Khasi Hills near longitude 91° E. Connected with this range of the genus, two facts stand out : — (1) The extreme age of the great valleys; (2) the great diiSerence between the MoUuscan fauna of Sikhim and that of the Dafla Hills, still more when it is compared with that of the Arbor country. Tliere are very few species common to both. Few Sikhim species are found in either : all is new, even new genera come in. The reason for this is no doubt due to the physical features of the great valleys : some, such as the Motiass and Subansiri, are very broad ; they go back far into the Range ; their sources glacial, they are separated one from the other by lofty snow-covered longitudinal ranges, which continue high to the plains. They are thus completely isolated one from the other, allowing evolution to go on independently within them and form " specific centres." The rich flora and fauna of Sikhim is in direct relationship to its position at the head of the 15ay of Bengal, and for ages has received accessions from that, the Southern side ; so with species of Qhssula, when those at present living between the Teesta and the Monass are compared with those of the Khasi and Garo Hills, 100 miles to the south, how small and yet how defined is the difference. Himalaya area : P^epresented in the Khasi-Garo area : lonciispira. tcnuispirn. hastula. sulJiastuJa. haeulina. sub-bandina. Between these two areas there is an indication of a once more continuous land-surface higher that at present. All this delta area lias gone through considerable depression with denudation. This is so well exemplified by the isolated, weathered masses of intrusive granite rising abruptly out of the alluvium by which they are surrounded at Chanda Dinga, opposite Gwalpara and Doobri. My Survey work took me to the top of several such hills. Granite intrusion is frequently seen ; it is to be noted at Tura and Eiwuk on the Assam Range, and similar intrusions occur further east and north intimately connected with the forces of upheaval. Those near Gwalpara, on the north side of the Brahmaputra, no doubt originally passed up and through stratified rocks long since denuded (perhaps of Cretaceous age) which cover so large an area in the Garo Hills, where they have also suffered great deuudation. Numbers, followed by the letters B.M., refer to specimens catalogued in three collecti(m9 presented to the British Museum, viz. those of 1. W. T. Blanfnrd and H. F. Elanford combined, 2. Colonel H. Beddome, 3. Godwin-Austen ; they cannot fail to assist those who may study this group or have to name specimens from India. 12 LAND ANU F1U'SIIW\TER ^ . N^orth-TVest irtmaJaija, (No species as yet found). DlSTlUBnTION OF THE GeNUS GlESSVLA IN THE GaXGETIC DeLTA, NoRTJi East Frontier of India, and JiuKMA. 2. Sihliiin and the Te.esta ValJei/, with Western Bhutan, includimj the Delta. Long. 88° to 89° East. Glrssula {Rishetia) longhpira, n. sp. -I „,' nt-tv' f"^' i i" 4a6'«/w8a, Henry Blanf'ord. PI. CLIX. fig. 7. Tar. exilis. PI. CLIX. figs. 13, U. rissomeyisis, n. sp. PI. CLIX. fig. C. . , , T, f PI. CLIX. fijs. 16, 17. { PI. ULXIII. figs. 9, 0 a. roherH, n. sp. PI. CLXIII. fig. 10. rarhiensis, n. sp. PI. CLXII. fig. 23. Glcssida ochracea, Godwin-Austen. PI. CLX. fig. 8. orohia, Benscm. PI. CLXII. figs. 5, 6. var. major. PI. CLXII. fig. 7. small var. PI. CLXIT. fig. 9. cra,stda. Reeve. { ]^{; cLXI V. Ifgs' ti. 15. From the Delta. Glessula sarrissa, Bs. PI. CLXI. fig. 10. gemma, Bs. PI. CLXI. figs. 20, 27, 28, 29. var. minuta, G.-A. Glessula (Rishetia) lonqispira, n. sp. (Plate CLIX. fig.s. 1, 2, shells; Plate CLXV. tigs. 1-1 c, anatomy.) No. 552 li.il. LocaUtif. Pisett Chu, Sikhim {Wm. Robert). Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture : tine, regular and rather coarse striation ; colour rudd}' ochraceous ; spire very long, sides straight, apex attenuate: suture shallow; whorls 13, sides flat, proportion of length to last whorl lUO : 'M ; aperture small, oval ; peristome thin ; columellar margin slightl}- convex. Size: maj. diam. 9'5; length 44 mm. In the Elanford collection (No. 238.06.2.2) one specimen measured 47"5 mm. in length, and is the largest I have seen. Shell of animal dissected 40 x 91 mm. ; whorls 13 (No. 552 B.M.). The generative organs (PI. CLXV. figs, la, Ih). — These are naturally very elongate and twisted ; the hermaplirodite duct is long and closely coiled. The albumen gland elongately oval, uterus and oviduct very long, com))act, cylindrical, the oviduct sliowing broad, close convolutions (follicles). The penis is a simple sheath. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 13 with the vas deferens given off' at the extreme distal end, close to the phnul ( f) which represents the flagelhim. In the second specimen dissected this is well shown (fig. 16); it is small, short, slightly hooked, not flat and notched as in O. ochracea. Further on, in a species from Cachar, a small variety of G. garoense (turreted and elongate) a similar short flagellum was found (Plate CLXV. fig. fi). The spermatheca (sji.) is an elongate sac on a long stalk. The retractor muscle is given off about half-way down the side of the sheath. The animal (flg. 1 ) can withdraw into the shell as far back as the three last whorls. The sole of the foot is widdy segmented from side to side. Contracted in spirits the animal has about 8 whorls (fig. 1 c). There are narrow right and left dorsal lobes, and on the cohimellar side a muscular cylindrical mass fills the characteristic groove. Glessula lokgispira, n. sp. (Plate CLIX. fig. 2.) Loealitij. llarhichu, Sikhim ( W. Robert). No. 3593 B.3I. Animal. Foot short, rich grey black, surface minutel}- papillate, in strong contrast with the sole, which is pale ochraceous, narrowly segmented transversely. Length to last whorl 100 : 39. The jaw is slightly convex, very thin and transparent, and under high power is seen to be made up of very numerous narrow elongate plates. Size : length 37 ; m.ij. diam. 8-75 mm. From the Uechila Peak on Sikhim border and Western Bhutan, Mr. Wm. llobert sent me five specimens (No. 28 B.M.), sepia- brown in colour, and with far stronger sculpture, which may be considered a local variety. The largest has 12 whorls, and measures 37-75 X 9-25 mm. Anatomical investigation shows that there are two very distinct sections of Glessula, and so far they conform to shell character — for how great conchologically is the difference between the turreted very long species and the glossy, oblong-conoid forms ? The short oblong species, such as G. gemma, have yet to be examined — they may have some character of their own, viewed anatomically. in this genus and this particular species it may be said I am laying considerable, even undue stress, on variation in a single organ — the penis —and of that only a part. This will be noted and felt even more by conchologists, some explanation therefore seems necessary for entering into physiological details. The flagellum is a very small organ, but one of great importance ; in the developmental life of the animal it has a most important part to play. Within it is formed the spermatophore, which is filled with spermatozoon, and eventually, in the act of copulation, is transferred to the spermatheca of the other individual — its spines keep it in position on its passage and retain it there. In different genera, it takes on more or less very complicated forms and becomes a very important character, 14 LAXD AND FUKSllWATKU often far more easily described than the shell itself. In tlie South African genera, Fellatus and Kerkophorus, it is a beautiful object in the microscope. Under Gleasula tenuispira, Benson, Colonel Beddome in his notes on Indian and Cej'lonese species of GlesKula in the ' Proceedings of the llalacologicnl Society of London,' vol. vii., Sept. 19(»6, p. 160, says : " Full grown ones collected in the Teesta Valley near Darjiling and in North Canara measure 44 mm. in length (vide Plato CLIX. fig. 1 ) and have fourteen whorls." The single exan]])le recorded from N. Canara is now in the Natural Hi-^tory Museum and is before me. This is a part of India which was well known to Colonel Beddome — in fact, where his work as head of the Forest Department lay. It is noticeable there should he no history, no remark on the very remarkable occurrence of this species in Southern India, and that only a single specimen was secured. Until it is rediscovered very considerable doubt must attach to the accuracy of the habitat. The specimen may even have been purchased. Glussctla canaraensis, n. sp. (Plate CLIX. fig. 8.) No. 681 Bedd. Coll. B.M. Locality/. N. Canara, collector unknown. (A single specimen, if found again.) Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture : irregular fine striation ; colour pale ochracoous; spire long, apex rather blunt, rounded; suture impressed, very slightly notched on lower margin by the striation ; whorls 14, flatly convex ; aperture oblique, ovate ; columellar margin slightl}' concave, truncate below. Size: maj. diam. 8'5; length 41-25 mm. After very careful comparison with all the specimens in the Blanford and my own collection, I believe this to be a fine, more attenuate example of G. longinpira, and that it really came from the neighbourhood of Darjiling. It is a single specimen, and its presence in Southern India has to be confirmed and the animal examined. Glesstjla bactji.it«^a, H. F. Blanford, No. 9-9.iii.l5 B.il. (Plato CLIX. fig. 7.) J. A. S. B. xL 1871, p. 43, pL ii. fig. 6. Original descri]ition : — " Testa elonr/ato-turriia, gracilis, ieniiis- ciila, oblique striata, fiiseo vel fulvo cornea, epidermide rdtescenle inditta. Spira turrita, apice ohtusidt. Anfractus 13, parum convexi ; inferiores siibcequaUs; sutura impressa, minute denticulata. Apertura obliqua, ovato-triangularis ; peristoma simplex, actum. Columella abrupte arcuata, oblique prodvxta, ad basin verticaUter trnncata. " Alt. 38 mm. ; diam. 6-5-7'5 mm. ; aperturse alt. 7, lat. 4 mm. " Ccpit Dr. F. Sloliczka apud Kbersiong Himalaya; Sikkinicnsis. 3I0LLUS0A or INDIA. 15 " This species appears to have escaped the notice of all prsTious collectors in iSikkim ; it was tound in association with its near ally Q. tenuisplra, Bens., by Dr. Stoliczka during a recent visit. It is easily distinguished from the latter species by its slenderness (the diameter being \ of the length), and the comparative narrowness of its whorls ; moreover, by the form of the columella, the lower part of which is bent abruptly almost at right angles with the slope of the inner lip : while in G. ienui^jiira, G. erosit, and other allied forms, the curvature is at the iituuj:?t obtuse. Specimens, the shell of which had been slightly wealhiTed, show fine spiral markings, but these are not visible unless the shell has become somewhat opaque. Tlie animal is dark leaden grey, somewhat paler at the sides of tlie foot. " The following is a list of the species now known from Sikhim : — - G. ttnuispira, Kens., G. erassula, Bens., G. hastula, iiens.. G. orobia, Bens., Gr. erosa, nob., G. bacidma, nob." When going through Henry Blanford's collection, bequeathed to the British Museum by his brother, I came on the type specimens of the above species ; these I had not seeu for 46 years. At the time I was stayiug with him in Calcutta, he placed them in my hands to figure for a paper he was preparing for the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. xl. pt. 2, 1871, p. 39. It is a very distinct species. I have (luite a large series obtained since from different localities in Sikhim and Western Bhutan. Beddome (Pro. Alalacol. Soc. 1906), in his paper on the genus, considers it onlj- a more slender form of G. f-nuispira, Bs., a view most dillicult to fall in with and support. There is a very considerable difference in general form — that is, when compared with the so-called tenuispira of Sikhim. Mr. Gude credits me with having found it in the Khasi Hills (F. B. Iiid. ii. p. 379), probably on the authority of Geoffrey Nevill, in his Hand-list, p. 170. The Khasi form is quite distinct and described further on. In the Beddome collection put up in the same bos are four shells under this name, with two labels in Beddome's handwriting. One has on it (three in pencil) "Daijiling, H. F. Bl.," the other (one in pencil) "Thyet Myo." It is easy to see the difference in this last from the others, the apex is much more attenuate, the aperture larger and broader. The Darjiling shells are quite typical, and I have com]>ared them with Henry Blanford's types. G. bacidina was found by Mr. Wm. Robert at Zemo Samdong in Sikhim, some CO miles up the Sikhim Valley — there smaller, 28 X 6-25 mm. (No. 553 B.M.) Glessttla (Eishetia) BActJLiNA, H. B]f. var. exilis. (Plate CLIX. tigs. 13, 14.) Localit)/. Rissom Peak, Sikhim (3595 B.M.) — Type. Damsang, Sikhim (3594) (T!\ liobert). Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture : rather close niised striation, oblique ; colour umbcr-brown ; spire long, apes fine. 16 LAND AND FEESnWAIun first three whorls nearly same diameter ; suture impressed ; wliorls 12, flatly convex, body whorl and aperture ^ of total length ; aperture ovate, small ; peristome thin ; columelja sharply curved, truncate. Size (Damsang) : maj. diam. 5-5 ; length 24"75 mm. (Kissom) : „ 57 „ 30-00 „ This is close to G. baculina, but the whorls are not so flat as in thac species, and it is very much smaller. GtEssui.A (Eishetia) EissriMENsi.s, n. sp. (Plate CLIX. fig. 6 of a Damsang shell.) No. 3570 B.M. Locality. Rissom Peak and Damsang, east of the Teesta Valley ( ir. liohert). Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture: close irregular striation well marked; colour dull white with a pale ochre tint; spire: a|iex blunt and rounded, sides nearly straight ; suture impressed ; whorls 10, the embryonic large and rounded smooth, sides tlatly eon vex; aperture ovate; outer lip with a good deal of convexity ; coli.mellar margin very slightly convex. Size (Rissom Peak) : maj. diam. 6-25 ; alt. axis 24'5 mm. I have this preserved in spirit ; the animal is pale coloured throughout. The specimens are not fully grown, the larger a)iex distinguishes it at once from G. baculina. It apjuoaches G. harnntttiensis of the Dafla Hills, but the apex of that shell is finer, the embryonic whorls being closer together. Specimens were also obtained on Rissom Peak. Glessula (Eishetia) hastula, Benson. (880.06.1.1.) (Plate CLXI. fig. 16); (No. 16.9.iii.lo B.M.) (Plate CLXI. fig. 17); (for apex enlarged, Plate CLXIII. figs. 9, 9 a, 10.) Achatina hastula, Benson, A. 31. N. H. ser. 3, vol. 5 (1860) p. 461. Original description : — " Testa turrito-suhulata, tenui, ohliqve (■! of my catalogue of the shells selected out of tho B.'ddome collection). They are Glessiila jiroiviensis, mihi, and very different in every way. The apex of one is given on Plate CLXIII. tin. 4 ; also that of G. orobia from the Henry Blanford collection, No. 17, fig. 8. Glessula orobia, Bs., var. major. (Plate CLXII. fig. 7.) llichila Peak, Sikhim. Type. (No. 556 BM.) Damsang, Sikhim. (No. 3336.) This is a much larger shell, yet has all the characters of the Darjiling examples in its general form and increase of the whorls. It is, however, a dark umber-brown, and in tliis respect is like craasula from the same peak, which is a much smaller shell. Var. major measures : maj. diam. 5'2 ; length 130 mm. Glessula orobia, var. major. (No. 556 B.M.) Damsang, Sikhim. (Plate CLXV. fig. 4.) The generative organs were seen complete and proved of great interest. The appendage given off near the junction of the vas deferens at head of the penis is small and hand-shaped ; it consists o2 20 LAND AND FKESHWATER of finger-like lobes, one short, and three united together longer (figs. 4rt and 4/j). It represents in a sliorterform the same append:ige in G. ocliniciu, in which there is one short and ten comh-like notches, and the still longer one as represented by Semper in (r. orojihili', wliich has led to its being described as a ftather-like gland and typical of the genus; a better kno-nledge of the animals shows it will only apply to a section of the genus. The elongate forms certainly form another, und may possibly have to be included in Bacillum. The prostate (fig. 4) is round, short, and solid ; the hermaphrodite duct, much convoluted and thickened, forming a mass close to the albumen gland. The teeth of the raduia do not differ from those of other species dissected. The formula is 16 . 1) . 1 . 9 . 16 or 25 . 1 . 25. Glkssula orobia, Es., small var. (Plate CLXII. fig. 9.) Locality. Eichila Peak, Western District. (No. 558 P.M.) ( W. liohert). Shell elongately conical, shining, somewhat tumid; sculpture : irregular distant striation ; colour umber-brown with a greenish tint ; spire rather short ; suture impressed ; whorls Qh ; columelkir margin slightly curved, truncate at base. Size: figured shell, maj. diain. 3-75 ; alt. axis 8'0 mm. largest ,, 40 „ 90 ,, Glesscla ceasstjla, Keeve, Bs. MS. (Plate CLXII. fig. 24.) Locality. Darjiliug No. 18.9.iii.l5, P.M. Typical from Ily. lilanford's collection. Shell elongately conical, smooth and shining, slender ; sculpture : •7ery few and distant striie ; colour umber-brown; whorls 6|. Size : maj. diam. 3'0 : alt. axis. 7'5 mm. largest ,, 8-0 „ These are all small and shorter than dimensions given in the original description, viz., 9 mm. In the Peddome collection are three specimens (No. 753) from the Naga Hills which bear a label in Col. Peddome's handwriting, G. crassula. I have compared them carefully and drawn the apex (Plate CLXIV. fig. IS) much enlarged ; it differs altogether in the sculpture from typical Darjiling examples of crasstda (Plate CI-XIV. fig. 14) in the Planford collection (No. IS) (Plate CLXIV. fig. 15). No. 753 is O. baralcensis. From the Karhichu in Sikhim 1 have 7 examples (No. 2481), which I consider a variety of the Darjiling form. The whorls have flatter sides, and the apex is much more blunt (Plate CLXR'. fig. 15). The largest measures a little over 9 mm. in length. In the ' Fauna of Eritish India, Mollusca,' vol. ii. p. 429, under MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 21 this species, " Khasi, Dafla and Naga Hills " is given as the range of this species and as collected by me. I hope soon to see these examples, not having found them in my own collection. The identification is Geoffrey Nevill's. I do not think he looked sufficiently closely at them. Mr. Gude has simply copied from Nevill's 'Hand-list,' p. 169, "30 specimens." These I trust are not now all mixed together. Jaintia Hills (Bcddome) is also given on p. 429. These I have seen, they are No. 751 of my catalogue (5 examples). They are not crassula, but a small var. of crassilabris. Glessula subjerdoni, Beddome, Nevill MS. Under this title the species is recorded by Geoffrey Nevill in his amended copy of the ' Hand-list' facing page 167. Tour specimens from the Jeypur Hills, Madras, received from Col. K. H. Beddome. Nevill gives the measurement as : long. 9, diam. 3| mm. ; anfr. 7. This would be the var. minor of Beddome. In the 'Fauna British India, MoUusca,' 1914, p. 434, Mr. Gude gives Darjiliiig as a habitat of this species from specimens he had found in the Boddorae collection. These are No.'814 of my catalogue of that collection : the name subjerdoni had been written by Bed- dome in pencil, a sign he had not determined it to his satisfaction ; nor had I, when I came across it first in 1912, when under the direction of the British Museum authorities I commenced working at the shells in the Beddome collection and making a catalogue of them. In August 1914, when duty in the country prevented my going as usual to town, Mr. Gude obtained access to the Beddome collection of Glesmla through those who had charge of it — very improperly, I consider, when it had been placed in my charge and a catalogue was in progress. Thus Mr. Gude was working at this collection, quite unknown to me, for a considerable lime — some three months,- — and when seen again by me was in a new state of arrangement, as put on record in my catalogue. In the interests of the distribution of Indian species it would not be fair treatment to overlook such record. I have, therefore, gone carefully over all the specimens of subjerdoni in the Beddome collection, so as to arrive at some better knowledge of them. I have had photographs made of the shells and made myself enlarged drawings with camera lucida of the apical whorls of the following three specimens, a better means of showing differences than any description : — No. 812. Bedd. coll. G. subjerdoni, Bedd., Golconda Hills. (Plate CLXIV. apex fig. 7.) No. 809. Bedd. coll. 0. subjerdoni, Bedd., Teunevelly Yalley. (Plate CLXIV. apex fig. 6.) No. 811. Bedd. coll. O. subjerdoni, ya,T. minor. TypicalJej'pur Hills. (Plate CLXIV. apex fig. 5.) By this test the so-called G. subjerdoni of Dai-jiling (No. 814 of 22 LAND AND FEESHWATER the Eeddoroe collodion) (Plate CLXIV. fig. 13) does not agree -n-ith the species from (he t_V]iical locality, the Golcoiid:i Hills. It is, iu ni)- opinion, a large variety of Glesmda crassula, Bs. Glesstjla saeissa, Eensoii. (Xo. 1596 L.M.) (Tlate C'LXI. fig. 10.) Fuguirahanda, Jessore, Lower Bengal (Godwin - Austen) (270.0tj.2.2) Diamond Harbour, Iloogly liiver (IT. T. JSlanford). Size : maj. diam. 68 ; length 188 nim. This is a liner specimen than the type described by Benson by nearly 3 mm. I give enlarged figure of the apex (Plate CLXIll. tig. 18). Achatina sarissa, B. A.M. N. H. ser. 3, vol. v. p. 463 (i860). Original description: — ''Testa elonrfcifo-conica, temii, hruujata, striatula. anfrartihus ultimis suh lente confcriim obsolete deciissatis, iiilidissima, oUcaeeo-cornea ; sjiira elutnjato-piiiamidata, apke ohluso, S'ltura impressa ; anfntciihus 1 k coiivea-iuscitiis, ultimo i testce super- ante ; ai-iertura suhverticali, ovato-eUijdica, columeUa ohliqua, leviter arcaata, alhido-caUosa, bcisi oblique truncata, peristoviate recto, tenui. " Long. 16, diam. 5 j mill. ; apcrt. 5 mill, longa, 3.1 lata. " Habitat prope Comercolly, Bengaliae, ad ripas flaniinis Gangis — Detexit Dr. Theodore Cantor." Glessula gemma, Bs.; Reeve, Conch. Icon. Achatina, pi. 22. f. 123. Original description : — " Testa ovato-oUonga, solidiiiscula, Icevi- gata, nitida, pellucida, purpurascenti-cornea ; spira elato-conica, apiee aciitiitscuhi ; sutura pvofiuida ; anfr. 6 nnvexiusculi ; uliimus f longitudinis eequans, hasi rotundatus ; columella arcuatu, suhcallosa, perist. simplex, rcclum, margim dextro et hasali leviter arquaiis. "Long. 8-8|, diam. 4 mill., ap. 3 mill., longa 2 lata.'' As a subgenus of Cionella it was made the tvpe bv Von Martens. Xo. 3559. From Klioostia, Bengal. (Plate CLXI. tig. 26.) 4. Hy. lilf. (9.iii.l5). From Bengal; authentic si). (Plate CLXI. fig. 27.) Xo. 3382. From Chandanagore. (Plate CLXI. fig. 28.) Ee- ceived from Xevill. 5. Ily. Blf. (O.iii.lo). From Chittagoug, var. (Plate CLXL fig. 29.) Xo. 3391. From Garo Hills. I have two specimens, much smaller and less tumid than the typical shell, measuring 6x3 mm. Six whorls. This I distinguish as var. minuta. It is dark umber in colour. This species is thus spread over the whole front of (he Delta of the Ganges and Brahmaputra. MOLLTJSOA OF INDIA. 23 3. The Dafla Hills, with the Pkuii of the Brahmaputra on south. Glessula (RisAelia) harmuttiensis, n. sp. PI. CI/XX. fig. 5. sarissa, Bs., var. PI. CLXI. fig. 8. saris^, Bs., var. PL CLXIII. figs. 16, 17, 19. sulihebis, Nevill MS., n. sp. | pj' CLXIV-IS".!. PI. CLXI. fig. 11. nevilliana, n. sp. ■ PL CLXI. figs. 12, 13. [ PI. CLXIV. fig. 3. dikrangcnt36, Dikrang, 2U00 ft., Dafla Hills: true suhhebes, G.-A. 3G3'4, no localit)- : '■'■ macera" J31f., Assam; name retaiued and described. (Type.) 3338, Naira, Assam : is master.ii, G.-A. 3637, no locality: mastcrsi G.-A. 3339, Assam, W. Blf. " macera " : is mastem, G.-A. 3635, no locality : naja, G.-A. 3640, Naga Hills : is mastersi, G.-A. When Nevill wrote he considered them all the same and a new species ; but it must be remembered that when Nevill was working at this genus the same critical examination was not made of the shells, such as Pilsbry advised and adopted. The apex and sculp- ture was never looked at except with a hand-lens ; a microscope was never in use. I was employed for six months in 1876-1877 in the Indian Museum, and saw Nevill constantly at work and occasionally worked with him. This has caused much confusion, for he also ajipears to have dis- tributed them under the name of " naja." Under this title he sent a specimen to Mr. Pilsbry, who describss and figures it in 'Manual of Conchology,' 2nd Series, Pnlmonata, p. 90, pi. 12. f. 10, as "naja" from "Assam." This turns out to be the Chittagong species. Pilsbry's shell is undoubtedly from Assam ; his descrij)- tion as well as the figure is so good, it verifies the locality. He says, as to the sculpture: — "Glimpses of excessively weak close spiral granule-lines may be seen in places." I had not noted this myself, but I now see the character in my tyi)e-s]>ecimcn of a Dafla Hill Glessida suhlules, an MS. name of G. NevilFs which I had adopted. On the other hand, the receipt of these shells in exactly the state Nevill left them (and he did a great deal of work on the genus, before he had to retire from the Service, especially on species from Southern India sent to him by Colonel Beddome) has cleared up the history and brought to light another species. In August ] 880, Nevill, writing to me, said. No. 80 of his ' Hand-list ' was G. macera, and I took this to be his MS. name for the lot until he should describe it. I have not come across the name in the Blanford collection nor in Blanford's original catalogue. It is interesting to record that Nos. 3634 and 3339 both bear this name on the labels in the glass tubes, and on that in 3634 Nevill has written "A. macera, Blf.," so we know the author. It turns out that the two tubes contain diflerent species, and 3634 is a mixed lot of two species ; for the very elongate, flat-sided form of one of these the name masera is most applicable, while it is not so for the more tumid shape of the other, which is mastersi. This fixes the habitat as Assam, and on looking through the Blanford collection I find two unnamed Glessulw (No. 842.06.1.1 B.M.), the habitat Assam, agreeing well in size and form with " macera." 2() LAKD AND FRE3HWATBB GiESsuLA NEvii.LiANA, n. sp. (Plate CLXI. figs. 11, 12, 13; riate CLXIV. fig. 3, apex.) No. -149. Type. Locality. Toruputu Peak, Dafla Hills (4 si)ecimens) {Godwin- Austen). Shell elongatel)' conical; sculpture, coarse somewhat irregular striation; colour: two ruddy, two dull ochraceous : spire high, apex blunt ; suture impressed ; whorls 9, sides flatly convex ; aperture narrowly ovate ; peristome thin ; columella rather straight, curved, short. Size : Type maj.diam. 5-0 length IT'O mm. whorls 9. Nevill gives for specimens in Indian Museum : — maj. diam. 4-0 length 13-0 mm. whorls 8. Small ruddy sp.( fig. 13) „ 4-0 „ 12-0 „ Large sp. with apex | g.Q ^_ ^^.q ^^ broken J 7 whorls left (fig. 12). In this last, from last suture to base of aperture 7 mm., as against 5.1 in the Type. "This species is recorded by Nevill in his revised copy of the ' Hand-list,' opposite page 170, as" Sienogyra (Glessiila) austeniana, Kevill — whorls 8, length 13, diam. 0 mm., one Toruputu, Dafla Hills (Type), coll. Godwin-Austen." The specimen thus named is probably in the Indian Museum. I cannot find that it was ever pul)lished: therefore it is now named after my old friend. His early death was a great loss, for he possessed a great knowledge of Indian MoUusca, and had made a close study of the genus Glessula. Glessdla dikeangense, n. sp. No. 448 B.M. (Plate CLX. fig. 7.) Locality. Toruputu Peak, Dafla Hills — in primeval forest. Type. ( Godwin- Austen.) Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture very fiue and close regular striation ; colour ochraceous with a strong green tinge ; spire long, sides very flatly convex, apex blunt; suture impressed; whorls 9, convexity of side very slight ; aperture oval, vertical ; peristome strong ; columellar margin curving. Size : maj. diam. 7-75 ; length 19-0 mm. In a paper on " The Helieidse of the Dafla Hills " (Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. xlv. pt. ii. 1876, p. 315) I included Glessida iUastris, the type of which was found on Heugdan Peak in the Naga Hills. This was a hasty determination ; after a far more critical one, and a comparison of the photographs of both, it shows con- siderable difl'erence, sufiicient to constitute a new species. The ju'oportion of the last whorl to the length of the axis is very difterent to that of typical G. illustiis— inking the axis as 100, it is 100:52. MOLLPSOA OF INDIA. 27 Glessula dikrangense, n. sp. No. 3404 B.'M. (Plate CLX. fig. 7 (I.) Locahti/. Toniputu Peak, Ditlla Hill.s {Godwin- Austen). Shell oblon^^l}' turreted; sculpture rather strong striation, close and regular; colour dull umber-hrown ; spire higli, apex blunt, side straight ; suture irajiressed ; whorls 8, side nearly Hat, spire to last whorl lU0:r)2'2; aperture oval; columellar margin slightly convex. Size: maj. diam. 7"0 ; length 17'2o mm. " DiKRANGiA," genus nov. Shell verj' elongate, small, transparent, delicate, turreted with many whorls closely wound and nearly ecjual in diameter, aperture very small, ovate ; animal not known. GlESSULA (" DiKRANGIA ") NEVILLI, G.-A. When describing the Helicida; of the Dafla Hills (J. A. S. B. 1876, vol. xlv. pt. 2, pi. viii. f. 12, p. 315) I put this species into the genus Opeas. This determination has been followed by Mr. G. K. Gude in the ' Fauna British India, Mollusca,' vol. ii. 1914, p. 360. Closer attention shows the aperture to be decidedly that of a Glessula, but the general form departs much from that genus — so much so, it might ■syell be placed in a distinct sub- section. This would be better left to be done when the anatomy of the animal is known to us. I think it better to consider it a new subgenus, and name it " Dih-anr/ia," coming after G. baculina and G. //(troense. 'I'he original description, which is as follows, was short and requires amendment — it was not drawn up on one-type shells, but on a set — niten done in those early days. Oriijiiial description: — "Shell turreted, very elongate, pale, silky with a ijreen tituje, older specimens of a pale straw-colour, covered with a thin ejiidermis, beautifully striate under lens. Whorls 11-12, modenitely rounded and very gradually diminishing in size to the apex, which is bluish ; suture impressed ; aperture angular above, outer lip thin. "Alt. (.)-5.5" ; major diam. O'lO". Largest specimens 0-90". " Hahitat. This very delicate elongate shell was common on Toruputu Peak, but far finer specimens, equal in size to the figure, were obtained on the banks of the Pichola Nulla out iu the plains. I am not satisfied with this figure, the whorls being rather too flat and the apex too sliarp. " I have named this shell after my friend 5Ir. G. Nevill, with whom I have now so long been associated in the study and collection ot Indian land-shells." 28 LAST) A.NU KHE-IIWATER Amended description. Glessuia nevilli, G.-A. No. 447 B.JI. LocaUti/. Toruputu Peak, Dafla Hills [GoJivin- Austen). Shell finely elongate, turreted ; soiiliiture, well-marked close irregular striutioii ; colour white; spire very slender and lengthened, apex blunt; suture impressed; whoris 12, the six last almost equal in diameter ; aperture small, narrowly and vertically ovate ; columellar margin convex. Size : maj. diam. 2'25 ; length 14 mm. Var. major, G.-A., Pichola ^'ulla, Durrang District. This has a very smooth surface with very indistiuct striation, and has a green tinge. The largest specimen measures 17*75 mm. in length by 3'5, and has 12 whorls. Although I refer to the Toruputu habitat of the Granite Peak on the main mountain mass 7322 I'eet above sea-level, and the Pichola Nulla low down and (juite out in the plains, I now note, 40 years later, there is a ditt'erence something more than " far finer .speci- mens," and that those from the Granite Peak are very different, particularly in size, proportion, and sculpture. Man}' oonchologists would consider them distinct species — however, it is sufSoient that G. nevilli stands for the mountain form, the one first found by me, and that of the plains be considered a variety major. 3 a. The Miri Hills. From the great Valley of the Subansiri no species of Glessula have been received ; it is a large unworked area of 250U sq. miles. 4. Eastern Assam ivith the Sinypho Hills and Patlcoi Range. « Glessula maiamensis, n. sp. PI. CLX. figs. 10-11. dihingeiisis, n. sp. PI. CLXIV. fig. 4 (apex). Glessula maiameusis, n. sp. No. 1737. (Plate CLX. fig. 10.) Type. Localiti/. Maiam Peak, Singpho Hills ; a single specimen (M. 0;,le). Shell oblongly turreted, rather tumid ; sculpture : strong, rather distaut, engraved striation, showing strong near suture ; colour ochraceous with a grcenisii tint ; spire elougately conoid. MOLLUSCA OF INDrA. 29 apex very hhinh and rounded, sides flatly convex ; suture mode- rately impressed; whorls 7, sides very flatly convex; aperture oval ; peristome outer tip thickened ; columellar margin slightly convex, nearly straight. Size: maj. diam. tl'5 ; length 22 mm. The above peak, a trigononjetiical station, is situated on the watershed of the Patkai Kange and is 6900 feet in altitude. It was first visited in the cold season of 1884-85 by Colonel Wood- thorpe, R.E., with his assistant Mr. Ogle, and they were accompanied by Mr. Tom D. La Touche of the Geological Survey, who published an excellent account of Geolog}' of the Upper Dihing Basin, Singpho Hills. Glbssitla MAiAMBNsis, n. sp. (PlateCLX.fig.il.) No. 29B.M. Localiti/. Divung Valley, Singpho Hills; two specimens {21. 1'. Ogle). Shell is more elongate than the tyjie ; colour is greener ; side of spire rather flatter ; aperture rounder, from the outer lip having more convexity. All the kind of diversity the sliells of this genus present, particularly when a large series is obtainable. Size : maj. diam. 8'5 ; alt. axis 20'b mm. Glessula dihingensis, n. sp. Localiti/. Dihing Valley, Assam (type No. 3251 B.M.) ; some ten specimens (J/. T. Oyle). No. 1600 B.M. from Sonari Tea Garden, near Sadiya. (Plate CLXIV. fig. 4, apex.) Shell elongate, turreted ; sculpture : very smooth generally, fine, close, rather strong ribbing near and below the suture ; cohmr umber-brown; spire long and fine; suture impressed : whorls 10, the last short ; aperture ovate, small ; columellar margin well curved. Size: maj. diam. 5-0; length 180 mm. This is not unlike G. mai-era, but the whorls are not so close and the last is longer in jiroportion to those above, i. «., a more tumid basal one. iSpecimcns from Sadiya (No. 3151 B.M., 10 in number, collected by my old assistant Mr. Ogle) differ in colour, being a very pale ash, the largest of 9 whorls measures 21 X 5'25 mm. I have also two examples from Sonari Tea Garden, 15-5 mm. in length, sent me by Mr. S. E. Peale, very finely and closely striated. 4 a. Ahor Bills and Tsanspv, Valley. Glessula oakesi, n. sp. PI. CLX. fig. 15. ahorensis, n. sp. PI. CLXII. fig. 4. 30 laxd and freshwater Glessula oakesi, G.-A. Records of [he ludian Museum, vol. viii. pt. xii. No. 49, p. 617, figs. 8 A, B, C, D. Locality. Abor Hills {Captain G. F. T. Oales, R.E.) No. 3G00 B.M. Type. (Plate CLX. fig. 15 x 1-56.) Orhiinal Description : — " Shell oblong turrcted, shining surface ; sculpture: regular somewhat distant incised lines; colour ochra- ceous one umber brown ; spire high, sides very flatly convex ; suture impressed; whorls 7, flatly convex, proportion of body whorl to length 100: 2-5; aperture rather narrowly oval, peristome outer lip thickened ; columellar margin slightly convex." "Size: maj. diara. 7'0 ; alt. axis lO'o mni." "Two specimens of this species, though rather smaller in size and not full}- grown, were sent to me from Brahmakund by Mr. M. Ogle, No. 3578 B.Jf. coll. The largest measures 11 x 5 mm. The species was received alive in 1913, from Captain Oakes with other species and dissected." No doubt the iirst Ghssula so received in this country ; a few lived for some months until the winter set in, feeding on lettuce, etc. "Animal of Ghssula oakesi from llotuiig (Oakes). The sole of the foot is crossed by coarse ridges, there is a very distinct peripodial margian (text-fig. 3 A). The genitalia (figs. 8 B, 0, I)) was fairly well seen in one specimen, but more material was sadly wanted. The hermaphrodite duct is conspicuous from its size and close convolution, bound closely together at its junction with the albumen glai]d. The penis is very short with a short stout flagel- lum terminating in three blunt knots ; it thus dift'ers from what 1 have been able to see in other species. The vas deferens is given off from near the head of the penis, the spcrmatheca was not seen." " This species (G. oahcsi) is the same as the one recorded from Rotung as G. botelhis, Bs., of Southern India by 3Ir. H. B. Preston in the ' Records of the Indian Museum,' vol. viii., Nov. 1915, p. 539; it is a bare record, in any case remarkable as regards range. As I had not noticed this South Indian species among the large series sent me from the Abor Hills, I was anxious to see the shells which had gone to Calcutta. Dr. Annandale very kindly sent these to me (October, 1916), and I have compared them with specimens of Glessula botelhis in the Henry Blanford collection from the Nilgiris, with the result that I cannot conliim Mr. Pres- ton's determination. This Abor Glessula (oal-esi) is decidedly smaller than G. hotellus, and not so tumid, the whorls are closer wound, the outer lip is much more thickened than in bvtdlus, tho Lirger shell. I have compared the embryonic whorls and made enlarged drawings of hotellus, Nilgiris (PI. CXLIII. fig. 1), of Mr. Preston's specimen (PL CXLIII. fig. 3), and of the type specimen of oakesi (PL CXLIII. fig. 2) ; the dift'erence between the first and the two last is very marked, it is unmistakable." MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 31 An example rather more tumid was received from Capt. Oakes (No. 3158 E.5I.), and one came from near the Serpo lliver bridge (No. 3053 E.M.). Glessula abokeusis, G.-A. 3103 B.M. Type. (Plate CXLII. fig. 4.) Eec. Indian Museum, 1918, vol. viii. pt. xii. No. 49, p. 618. Localit;/. Abor Hills ; five specimens ( Crty)*. G. F. T. Oakes, B.E.). Original description : — " Shell elougately turreted, sides nearly straight ; sculpture : very regular striation, less apparent on the last whorl ; colour dark chestuut-brown ia the type-shell, more ochraceous in others ; spire attenuate, apex blimt ; suture im- pressed ; whorls 8, sides flatly convex ; aperture ovate ; peristome outer lip thin, with strong convexity ; columellar margin nearly straight, feeble, slightly truncated. " Size : niaj. diam. 5-0 ; alt. axis 16-25 mm. " This species varies in form, some being less attenuate, but all have the blunt apex and similar sculpture." 5. Garo, Kasi, and Jaintia Hills. Glessula ieimispira, Bs. PI. CLIX. fig. 3. suhacidina, n. sp. PI. CLIX. figs. 4, 9. ^theobaldi, Hanley MS. garoense, n. sp. PI. CLIX. fig. 1.5. small var. PI. CLIXX. fig. U. manipurense, var. ,, , , J PL CLXI. fig. 18. suulmst ula, n. STp. -i pj CLXIII fiu- l."> ( PI. CLX. figs. 14, 17,18,19,20. crassilabris, Bs. \ PI. CLXIV. figs. 16, 17. [ PI. CLX. fig. 17. var. nana. PI. CLXII. fig. 23. pt/ramis, Bs. PI. CLX. fig. 24. hanlciji, n. sp. PI. CLXII. fig. 16. solidus, n. sp. PI. CLXII. fig. 8. Jadukamia ahnormis, n. sp. PI. CLX. figs. 22, 23. Glessula tenuispira, Benson. Colonel Beddome, in his Monograph of the Genus (Pro. Malacol. Soc. vol. vii. 19U6, p. 160), records this species from many localities all very distant from each other, viz., Darjiling, Pegu, N. Canara, Khasi, and Dafla Hills. In a paper by Beuson in the 'Annals and Magazine of Natural History' (I860), he gives a list of all the Continental-Indian species of Achatina — in which A. tenuispira appears as from the Khasia Hills, Darjiling, and Burma ; he 8a3-s also " In Burmah Mr. Theobald got a variety of A. tenuispira on the banks of the Irawady." I have for long doubted that this species has such an extended range. Beddome even goes further 32 LAND AND FRESHWATER and considers 0. hacuUna, Hy. Blanford "only a more slender form of temiispira" (PI. CLIX. tigs. 1, 2); be could not possibly have seen the types of the former speeies — the shell from the Khasi Hills (Teria Ghat) (PI. CLIX. tig. ;5) differs altogether from the Sikhim one, and when they are placed side by side the i)oiiils of difference are seen at once. I still more doubt the extension of iemtispira to North Canara as well as to Pegu. In J. A. S. B. 1805, p. iJo, lilanford says Achatimt tenuispira, Bens., of small size is common at Akouktoung and farther south. I refer to this under Gh'ssida j^ierttnuis, Ko. 8, East of Bay of Bengal. I have not at present tlie shells to examine. Geoffrey Nevill, 'Hand List,' i. 1878, p. 169, records Darjiliug, also Khasi and Dalia Hills ■ from these two last localities the shells were of my collecting, for when Nevill was studying the genus 1 supplied him liberally with specimens. The first record of G. tenmsjiira appears in a paper entitled " Descriptive Catalogue of Terrestrial and Fluviatile Testacea, chiefly from the North-East Frontier of Bengal," by W. H. Benson, Journal of Asiatic Society Bengal, June 1836, p. 350. (The Collection was purchased by the Asiatic Society in 1833.) No. 11. in the List. — AcJiatina tenuisj^iira. Original description : — " Testa elongata ticrriia, cornea, longi- tudinaliter striata, versus apicem attenuata, colamnari, anfractu ultimo interdiim facills, quihusdam albidis transcersis ornato, suturis ijnpressis apice obtuso. " Long. 1 poll, circiter; Lat. 0-55. "This Achatina, belonging to De Ferussac's subgenus CocJdicopa and to his group of Hyloides, is remarkable for the attenuated columellar form of the terminal whorls of the spire." (Followed by No. 12, Crassilahris). At the time this description was written, Benson had not seen a Dariiliiig specimen ; he was then Magistrate and Collector of Bylhet, and there can be no doubt whatever typical tnudspira came from that district — most probably from that rich collecting place Teria Ghat, which lies on its northern boundary, where Benson also obtained the very well-marked species G. crassilahris. We are apt to forget how much we owe to Benson and Hutton, the pioneers in Indian Malacology, who, with little assistance and encouragement, did so much. Looking back to the early thirties and the'manv papers Benson lived to publish, it is noticeable how much his remarks increase the interest in the species he discovered, how much is suggested as to relationship and distribution. The brothers Blauford followed with the same scientific treatment. In comparison the record of to-day, with few exceptions, is bald to a decree owing to a want of knowledge of the physical features of the country, its size, and varying climatic conditions. MOLLDSCA or INDIA. 33 GLT:ssnLA tenuispiea, Bs. Coll. Hj-. Blf., No. ]1.0.iii.l5 B.ll. (Plate CLIX. fig. 3.) Locality. Teria Ghat, Khasi. Henry Blanford's collection contains 4 specimens from that ])lace, and I have 10 others (No. 1016 B.M.) collected by myself. The largest of these measures 31 mm. long by 8j breadth at the aperture. It diifers in form very considerably from what has been hitherto known as tenuispira of Darjiling and ISikhim, which I have named and separated as longispira. Glessula (Eishetia) TENDI8PIEA, Bs. ll.O.iii.lo B.il. (Plate CLIX. fig. 3.) Locality. Teria Ghat, foot of Khasi Hills {ex coll. H. F. Blan- ford). Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture striation distant, closer, finer, and regular towards the apex ; colour ochraceous, with decided green tint ; spire long, apex rather blunt, sides nearly straight, slight convexity; suture impressed; whorls lO'o, slightly convex, proportion of spire to last whorl lUO: 29; aperture oval; cohiniellar margin rather straight. Size: major diam. 9'0 ; length 29'0 mm. I obtained this species at Teria Ghat and also in the West Khasi Hills, some dozen specimens (No. 1582 B.M.), the largest being 33 mm. in length. Glessitla (Eishetia) tencispiea, Bs., var. No. 3332 B.M. Locality. Garo Hills, a single specimen {Oodwin- Austen), Shell more slender in form; sculpture smoother than the Teria Ghat examples of tenuispira ; colour ochraceous umber-brown ; spire, apex fine; whorls 11, 100: 40-4; aperture narrowly ovate. Size: maj. diam. 8'0 ; length 27"25 mm. Specimen from above Tura, 10 x 29-8. It is of considerable interest to note that Mr. S. W. Kemp, of the Indian Museum, has recently collected Glessula tenuispira at Tura in tlie Garo Hills, extending its range from Teria Ghat thus far to the west some 100 miles. Throughout this distance, the conditions are the same (tropical forest and for half the year excessive rainfall) on the steep sp\irs overlooking the great marshes of Sylhet and Mymensing. Dissection shows the animal to have all the characters of the species I describe under longispira of Darjiling and Sikhim. It marks the western extension of the subgenus — this also falls in with the geological evidence we possess, that the Garo-Khasi area was in early Tertiary time much more intimately connected with the South-Eastern Himalaya on the north and not so markedly cut off as now by the broad low valley of the Brahmaputra, filled with alluvial deposits of great thickness. TAKT I. D 34 LAND AND i'KESUWAT£R GlESSTJLA (EiSHETIA) SUBACULINA, D. sp., CoU. G.-A. No. 3555 B.M. (Plate CLiX. fig. 9.) Locality. Landomodo Trigonometrical Station. Type. N. Khasi Hills (7 specimens); The ilaotlicritlian Ridge (No. :3556) (4 speci- mens) ; South Jaintia (1 specimen). Tura, Garo Hills (/S". IF. Kemp). Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture irregular, well-developed rather coar.^e striation, but varying much in difierent shells ; colour ochraceous; spire elongate, sides flatly convex, apex blunt; suture rather shallow; whorls 12, sides not quite flat; aperture narrowly ovate : columella curving subobli(iuely, broadly trancate. Size : maj. diam. 7'ii5 ; length 31'0 mm. This approaches the Sikhim G. haculina Bs., but is rather broader than that species, the whorls near apex increasing more rapidly. It is not so smooth and shiny. No. 77 of Nevill's ' Hand list,' p. 170, Gless. lacuVtna — 3 Khasi Hills, presented by me, are suhaeulina ; tlicy have been sent home (1916) by Dr. N. Aunandale and compared by me. Glessula (Kishetia) SUBACULINA, G.-A., No. 1560 B.AI. (Plate CLIX. tig. 4.) Conch. Ind. pi. svii. fig 5 as G. theohalcU, Hanley MSS. Locality. Teria Ghat, foot of Kliasi Hills (^Godwin- Austen). Shell elongately turreted, slender; sculpture: striation of growth strongest below the suture and most regular on the 5th and tith whorls ; colour umber-brown or dull ochraceous ; spire elongate, apex fine ; suture shallow ; whorls 12, sides flat, proportion spire to last whorl 100: 24-4; aperture narrowly ovate; peristome outer lip thin ; columellar margin regularly convex, not solid. Size: maj. diam. 9'5 ; alt. axis 34'75 mm. There are two specimens in my collection now in the Natural History Museum (No. 1580 B.M.); their history is of interest and important with regard to the exact habitat of G. theohaldi, Hanley. Considerable confusion surrounds this species, owing to the authors of the 'Conchologia Indica' working apart when it was passing through the press — one (Mr. Hanley) in England, the other (Mr. Theobald) in India, dealing with shells from two very different localities. Hanley first describes the shell very briefly of AeJudina theohaldi. Conch. Ind. p. 9, 1870 ; in explanation of pi. svii. fig. 5, from "Near the Salwen," he says, "Difiers from A.cassiacn, of which it has been considered a variety, by its smoothness, more convex ■whorls, &c." The sliell was therefore a Bacillum, and we can presume the species recorded by Theobald from the Shan Stales was also a Bacillum, vide a paper in the ' Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,' 1870 (not 1871 as given by Gude), vol. xxxix. p. 395. On land-shells from the Shan States and Pegu as Achatina {Glessida) 310LLUSCA OF INDIA. 35 thcohiddiana, Hanlej', the footnote Conch. Indica, pi. xvii. fig. 5, shows us that that work was published and had been seen by him. In ' Nevill's Hand-list,' p. 17:^, we find " No. 102 Stenorjijra {Qlessula) tJteobahli, Hanley, 2, Salween, coll. Mr. Theobald. " Nevill puts tiiera in Bacillum. It is to be hoped these specimens are still in the Indian Museum, for they are very valuable; they would clear up where true Glessida iheohaldi comes from. Hanley figured it on jil. xvii, but in the index to Achatina in the Conch. Indica, p. xii, to tJteobiddi there is a footnote "2" "from Teria Ghat." Itlooks asif Hanley had substituted another species for figuring, and not taken the Shan one, under the im[)rcssion they were one and the same. I am glad I am able to clear this up to a certain extent, and show how a Khasi Hiil form has got introduced. When Hanley was engaged on the 'Conchologia Indica' I sent him a number of species of Qlessula both named and unnamed, which he afterwards returned to me. Among them I have two specimens of a Glessida named Theohaldi — in Handler's handwriting — from Teria Ghat (No. 1580, Godwin-Austen Collection, British Museum). At the time I lent Hanlej my GlessnJx I had not a single species of the genus in my collection from the Salween Valley, so there could be no mingling of specimens. Turning to pi. xvii., it may be noted at once that the shells are all enlarged ; lake, for example, G. orohia (fig. 7) and G. 2»'(elustris (fig. 6). G. theohcddi (fig. 5) has a very considerable likeness to the Teria Ghat shell which Hanley returned to me with tluit name, allowing for similar enlargement with the sculpture also somewhat exaggerated. At the same time fig. 5 has not at all the form of a Bacdlam, measuring 42 mm. as given by Mr. Gude (ex icon) ; on the contrary, it has a fine attenuate apex and not the characteristic blunt rounded one of Bacillani {vide drawing by same artist, Mr. G. B. Sowerby, of B. cassiaea with its flat sides). All this points to fig. 6 representing the Teria Ghat specimen, and it is quite possible the one photographed for me by Mr. T. S. Glad- stone (PI. CLIX. fig. 4) is the identical shell. Theobald's shells from the Salween, in the Indian Museum, cleared this up ; for on making application for them to Dr. N. Annan- dale, the present Superintendent, he has most obligingly sent them to me (March lUlG) ; the label is in type, a cutting from p. 172. Tliey belong, as Nevill records them, to the genus BacHlvm ; they are both immature, the largest of 9 whorls, measuring 23'25 mm. in length, with sides of greater convexity than in B. cassiaea, distinguishing it at once. The typical sjiecimeu sent home by Theobald to Hanley would appear to have been lost ; it is fortunate that about the same time Theobald gave specimens to the Indian Museum. I found in the Beddome Collection (No. 121) a single, also immature shell, with a label " sent by Theobald as ' Salwiniana.' " On comparison with the specimens of B. theohaldi, Hanley, from Calcutta, I consider it the same ; it is only 21 mm. in length. Mr. Gude had marked it " young of cassiaea Bs." D 2 36 LAND AND FRESHWATER Glessttla (Rishetia) garoense, n. sp. (Plate CLTX. fig. 15.) Locality: South Garo Hills. Type. No. 1595 B.5I. {Godwin- Austen). Shell attenuately turreted, sides flat, thin ; sculpture, surface very smooth, a few distaut transverse shallow engraved lines, ditferiug from the usual raised stria; ; colour pale umber-brown ; spii'e tine ; apex very attenuate, first 4 whorls with same diameter (PI. CLXIV. tig. 5); suture shall-jw ; whorls 13, sides flatly convex, there is but little difference in the diameter at the Dth whorl and the last; aperture narrowly ovate; peristome thin, a callous on the body whorl ; oohimellar margin oblique, very slight in structure, Size: maj. diam. 5-0; total length 27'25 mm. In form it is similar to 0. bacnlina, var. exilis of Sikhim ; the apex is not so attenuate, the whorls are flatter, and the sculpture differs considerably. In the Sikhim form there is much raised striation. Under No. 68, p. Ifi9, of 'Nevill's Hand-list,' 2 specimens from the Garo Hills are recorded under G. pertenuis ; they were presented unnamed by me. These have been kindly sent home for comparison by Dr. N. Annandale, to whom my best thanks are due ; they are this species garoense. On this data in the ' Hand-list,' Mr. Gude in ' Fauna British India ' extends the range of G. pertenuis, a Pegu species, to the Assam Range ; such record of distribution is valueless. GtEssuLA (Rishetia) garoense, G.-A. Locality. South Jaintia ; 4 specimens, No. 35Q2 (Godwin- Austen). Shell attenuately turreted ; sculpture, striation very fine and close, disappearing in full-grown shells; colour dull umber-brown ; spire tapering evenly ; whorls 12. Size: maj. diam. 5-5 ; length 26-75 mm. At first sight there is a remarkable similarity between this species and G. vertenitis, Wm. lilanford, of Basscin, but it dis- appears under the microsco])e. The apical whorls are not alike, and the aperture differs still more ou the columellar margin and truncation. Glesstjla (Rishetia) gaeoense, G.-A., small var. (Plate CLIX. fig. 11.) Locality. Naraindhur, Cachar; 11 specimens. Type. No. 1657 {F. Ede). This measures 20'5 mm. in length and 4'5 mm. in maj. diam. It is of a darker umber than typical garoense, and has the very smooth surface of that shell; 12 whorls, sides slightly more convex ; apex very fine, first 4 whorls hardly increase at all (PI. CLXIV. fig. 6). I am fortunate in having specimens in spirit of a .omall elongate many-whorled species from Silchar, Cachar, sent me by Mr. F. Ede. MOLLUSCA OP INDIA. 37 (The sole of the foot very closely segmented.) I have been successful iu getting out the genitalia, but in a detached state. The specimen contained 8 well-formed eggs in the oviduct ; they measure 1-5 mm. in diameter, perfect globes. The penis (Plate CLXV. fig. 6) has an elongate simple sheath, with a very small flagellum, close to the vas deferens attachment at the distal end. The spermatheca (fig. 6 a) was elongate with a bulbous end ; the penis is thus similar to that of O. lonrjispira of Sikhim, and it may ultimately be found that all the elongate turreted Glessul(p. will have this type of male organ distinguishing them from that of G. ochracea, &c. The formula of the radula is : 20 . 7 . 1 . 7 . 20 or 27 . 1 . 27. The centre tooth has a long narrow plate with a small cusp at the base ; the admedian are of the same shape as in G. longispira ; the marginals are very numerous, becoming very minute on the outer edge. There are no intermediate teeth ; the admedian merge into the marginals. Glessula stjbhastttla, n. sp. (Plate CLXI. fig. 18; Plate CLXIII. fig. 15, apex.) Locality. Nongsingriang, North Khasi Hills ; No. 3551 B.M. T3'pe (Godwin- Austnit'). Shell elongately ■conoid ; sculpture irregular, fine close, very well- defined transverse stiiation (not so regular as in G. hastula) ; colour dark oehraceous ; spire long attenuate (less so than hastula), apex fine (larger than in hastula) ; suture impressed ; whorls 7^, sides flatly convex ; aperture very narrow, vertical ; peristome thin ; columellar margin nearly straight. Size: Type. Maj. diam. 3-25; length 9'0 mm. apex. N. Khasi sp. (3546' b!m.) „ 3-5 „ 10-75 „ largest (3557 B.M.) „ 3-50 „ 12-0 „ I first found this species (No. 3549 B.M., enlarged apex, PI. CLXIII. fig. 14), which I then took to be hastula of Benson, in the deep valley to the east of Cherra Poonjoe the first summer I passed there. Two specimens were returned to me by Mr. Sylvanus Hanley, in whose hands I placed a number of species of Glessula when he was working on the ' Conohologia Indica' — this No. 3546' (PI. CLXI. fig. 19) was returned to me with a note in pencil " allied to sublvsiforiiiis, W. BIf ." A single specimen of suLhastula was also found in the Dunsiri Valley below SMmagutiiig. I have received a specimen from Mr. S. W. Kemp found at Tura, Garo Hills. Glessula sfbrastula, G.-A., var. type (Plate CLXI. fig. 19.) Locality. North Khasi ; No. 3546 (Oodwin-Austen). Shell elongately conoid ; sculpture regular, quite strong striation ; colour rich umber-brown : spire long, sides Hattened, apex blunt rounded; suture impressed; whorls 7|, sides flattened ; aperture rather narrow ; peristome slightly thickened ; columellar margin nearly vertical, not truncated. 88 LAND AND l''UKSH WATER Size: maj. diam. 3-0; alt. axis 10'4 mm. This is mucli stouter and with a much bluntor apes than typical suhhasiuja, with the aperture not so narrow ; 9 specimens were found on Hinriutinoh Peak. North Cachar Hills. No. 2026 B.M., apex enlarged (PL CLXIll. fig. 12). No. 3557, North Khasi, apex enlarged (Pi. CLXIII. fig. 11). Glessula illtjsteis, G.-A. 3076 B.M. type. Journ.Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. sliv. 2, 1875, p. 3. (Plate i. fig. •").) Figured in ' Conchologia Indica,' 1875, pi. cii. fig. 9. Nevill, ' Hand-list,' i. 1878, ]>. 170, 7 sp., Heugdan. Original deserijAion : — " Shell elongately oval, greenish hornv, finely striated longitudinally; whorls 7, very slightly rounded; suture moderately impressed ; the li|> thickened ; columellar margin slightly curved and strong: apex blunt." " Length 0-75; maj. diam. 0-3; length of aperture 0-3 in. I]tion : — " Shell turreted, elongate, solid, in fresh state brown and lustrous, finely longitudinally striated ; whorls 10, rather flat, suture .shallow, apex blunt ; aperture subvertical, fusi- form, angular above ; peristome very thick, paler brown on margin ; columella strong. Alt. 1'37 ; major diam. 0-4 in. The finest specimens were collected under the Peak of Xhunho, Eastern BurraU Bange ; they were also abundant under Japvo at about 7000 feet. Size (Type, the largest): major diam. 9'5; length 33"8 mm- iOO : 44, spire to last whorl. This beautiful species is found in the old damp and shady prima; vai forest. Glessula (RisHETii) burrailensis, G.-A., var. (Plate CLX. fig. 4.) No. 1585 B.M. Locality. Kopamedza Peak, 8375 ft., Naga Hills, Trigonometrical Station {^G-odwia-Austen). MOI.LUSCA OF INDIA. 45 Sholl rather more tumid in form ; colour ochraceous, with a strong; green tint ; whorls 8 ; columellar margin nearly straight, compared with type. Size (specimen figured) : major diam. 9-25 ; length 26-25 mm. k GiEssuLA (Rishetia) bueeailensis, G.-A., var. (Plate CLX. fig. 3.) No. 1586 B.M. Locality. Japvo Peak, Naga Hills, at 8-9000 feet {Godwin- Auxtcii). Shell much more slender in form ; apex blunt, shining ; sculpture well marked, regular striation, extending to the apex ; colour strong ochraceous, with a greenish tint ; spire elongate, sides flatly convex, suture impressed ; whorls 9| ; aperture ovate ; peristome on outer margin slightly thickened ; columellar margin slightly concave. Si/c (specimen figured) : mnjor diam. 7'0 ; length 25'25 mm. Plentiful in ihe forest, covering the Peak on all sides. Glessitla (Rishetia) butleki, G.-A. No. 15S3 P.M. (Plate CLX. fig. 9.) J. A. S. B. xliv. ] 875, p. 4, pi. i. fig. 7. Locality. Eastern Burrail Range {G'xlwin- Austen). Original description : — " Shell elongately turreted, very thin and brittle, tumid, pale corneous, glassy, very minutely striated, apex very blunt ; whorls 8, rather rounded, suture deep, body- whorl much swollen and capacious ; aperture vertical, pear- shaped, lip rather thin. " Alt. 1'13, major diam. 0-45 in. " Hah. Eastern Burrail Range, at 6000 feet ; not a common form. " I name this shell after Captain J. Butler, Political Agent in the Naga Hills, with whom I had the fortune of being associated when mapping that very interesting and beautiful district." Size : Largest specimen, major diam. 12-75 ; alt. axis 28'0 mm. Specimen figured, ,, II-O; „ 26-25,, Proportion of length to body-whorl, 100 : 54. Glessula (Rishetia) buerailensis, var. maxwelli. (Plate CLX. figs. 5, 6.) No. 1717 B.M. Locality. Naga Hills, exact locality unknown, but East of Kohima ( Col. H. St. P. Maxwell). Somra, Khulen Post. West of Kyendwin or Chindwin River, Upper Burma (/'' Ede). Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture coarse, close, irregular ribbing (fig. 6); colour rich sienna-browu (fig. 6): spire long, sides nearly flat ; lOU ; 47-6 ; suture shallow ; whorls 10, sides nearly flat ; aperture narrowly oval, outer lip strong ; columellar margin nearly straight, solid. 40 LAXD AND FRESHWATER Size : Fig. 5. Type, major diam. 8-5 ; alt. axis 320 mm. Largest bleached shell, „ 9-2 ; „ 35'0 ,, This species was given to me liy Colonel Maxwell ; obtained on one of his tours in the Naga Hills, East of the Anghami Naga tribe. Glesstjla (RisnETiA) siAsTKESi, n. sp. Type. (Plate CLXII. fig. 1.) = macera, Nev. MS. from Assam. Locality. Golaghat, Assam ; 3 specimens found. Blf. Coll. 843.06.1.'l B.M. (J/nsfcrs). Same locality. 4U.00.3. B.M., 2 ex- amples ; 837.00.1.1 B.M., 5 examples. Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture distant striation ; colour pale ochraceous ; spire long, sides flat; apex is fine, increasing gradually (PI. CLXIII. fig. 2U ; another specimen No. S37.0tion : — " A. lyertenuis, n. sp. Shell very slender, turreted, thin, light homy, polished, closely, minutely, and rather irregularly striated. Spire subulate, somewhat acuminate towards the blunt apex ; suture impressed, subcrenula.te. 'Whorls 11-12, convex, the last about 1/5 the length of the spire. Aperture oblique, ovately pyriform, peristome tbiu margins united by a thin callus, columella moderately curved, obliquely truncated. MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 53 millim. inch. " Length 20 0-8. Diameter 4^ 0-18. Length of aperture 4 0"16. " Habitat. Tongoop, Arakan. " Var. major, leugth 264 mm. ; diameter 6 ; length of aperture 6. Of another specimen ; length 23 mm. ; diameter 5ij ; length of ajjerturo 5\. " Habitat. Pyema Khyoung, Bassein District, Pegu. " A much more slender species than A. teimispira, Bens, (a variety of which also abounds in parts of Pegu), though there are signs of a passage. The present appears to replace A. tenuispira in Arakan and I3assein. Mr. Benson, to whom I sent a specimen, observes that it is intermediate between A. tenidspira and A. hastula, Bens." No. 239.06.2.2 of the Blanford colled ion is represented by seven examples of this species, with this pencil note by Blanford, "very like tenuispira," from two localities, Tongoop, in Arakan, and Henzada on the Irrawady, the respective locality was not indi- cated ; but they are all alike, two are of the same length as given in the description — viz., 20 mm., white. The largest specimen now figured is 22-25 x 5 mm. Fortunately I have from Henry Blanford's Collection (No. 20.9.3.15) two specimens from Henzada, one of which I figure ; it is 22-0 mm. long x 5 in major diameter, which settles the matter of habitat. They no doubt were given him by his brother. Under G.perteuuis, var. major, William Blanford gives the dimen- sions of a larger form from the Bassein District, which is farther to the south. Three examples from this locality are in the Henry Blan- ford collection ; they do not agree with j^O'temiis, the general shape is different, the apex particularly being much blunter. It cannot be therefore considered a variety — I name and figure it as G. bassein- ensis (Plate CLXIV. fig. 10 for apex). In Col. Beddome's Collection (No. 682) is a single large speci- men, 26-75 in length x 7 mm., from Thyetmyo, named by him G. baculina; it agrees best with G. nathiana; it has much the general form of pertenuis, but is larger, is ash-coloured, with rough strong striation. A hasty examination recalls so-called tenuispira of Darjiling, but a closer shows quite a difterent increase of the whorls, and that they are by no means so flat. It is also milky white within the aperture, quite a distinguishing character, ■which I note is to be seen also in the typical specimen of G. per- tenuis from Henzada. Nevill records pertenuis from Akouktoung and Thyetmyo. This large form must be the variety of tenuispira referred to by \Vm. Blanford as abounding in parts of Pegu, and in hi.s "Contributions to Indian Malacology," 1865, J. A. S. B. vol. xxxiv. p. 95, he says: "■ Achatina tenuispira, B., of small size, is common at Akouktoung and farther south." On the same glass slip in the Blanford Collection (No. 238.06.2.2) were gummed five specimens, labelled G. tenuispira, 54 LAND AND KRKSHWATKK Pegu and Durjiliiig; four were ccrtairil\- from tlie latter place, but one was cjuite a different species and smaller, and may have come from Pegu. Nevill gives the Garo Hills on two specimens from my collection ; this cannot be an accurate determination, as I have nothing like it. The ten specimens from Assam are something else. Recently (July 1917) further material has come to hand: when going through \Vm. Blanford's collection of duplicate shells, I came on four pill-boxes containing Glessula from Pegu, with true locality and named as follows : — No. I contained AeJiatina tenuhpira from Bassein District, 14 examples; No. 2 from Akouktoung, IS examples; No. 3 Achalina }>t'rtenuis from Tongoop, which is on the Arakan Yoma, 8 examples ; No. 4 "intermediate between ii-iiuispira awd j)erie)miii " from Pyema Ivhyoung, Bassein District, 2U examples. These clear up doubts on distribution and show .so well what Blanford's views were at the time he was describing Pegu Glessulas. No. 4 is G. Ixisseinensis, described further on. No. 2 dift'ers from this in many respects, due, no doubt, to its habitat on the Limestoue rocks, which the name implies, " Akouk " being lime and "toung" a hill in Burmese ; I remember the place well. I adopt it as the specific name. No 1 is a well-defined species differing from the preceding, which I name G. nnthiana. from the Burmese name " nath " for spirits or fairies of woods and hills. Glesstti.a basseinensis, n. sp. (Plate CLXIY. fig. 12, apes ; Plate CLXI. fig. 3.) Lornlitii. Bassein, Pegu, three specimens. Pyema Khyoung, Bassein, six specimens (^ TF. T. Blanfurd). Type. No. 10.9.3.10 B.il. Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture close, fine, regular, rallier coarse; colour ochraceous; spire elongate, sides nearly straight, very slightly acuminate near the blunt apex, 100: 33'7 ; suture moderately impressed ; whorls 11, fides very fially convex ; aper- ture narrowly ovate; columellar margin cnrved slightly. Size: major diam. 0'25 ; alt. axis 25'0 mm. This is the var. major o^ iiertenuis Blanford alluded to above ; it is not so attenuate in general form, the apex is much stronger and blunter, fewer whorls, white, longer, and the sculpture coarser; a comparison of figure (No. 3) with those of true ienui- s/nra from Teria Ghat and liusUda shows, better than any description, how much it differs. Glessttla (Rishettia) naihiana, n. sp. Locality. Bassein District (IF. T. BJanford). Type. No. 2206 Oe.l'.l B.M. Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture regular, fine, raised, close etrise throughout ; colour strong, ochraceous ; spire elongate, sides MOLLTJSCA OF INDIA, 65 nearly flat, apex very blunt; suture well impressed; whorls 11, sides flatly convex ; aperture broadly ovate ; columellar margin very convex. Size : maj. diam. 7*0 ; length 22'75 mm. This species was found among Blanford's duplicate shells, the box marked with above locality and with the note " intermediate between temiisj^ira and jierteiniis" ; it differs quite sufficiently from both and from hasseinensis to be distinguished. From the last, it is far longer at the body-whorl, which is very swollen, its sides more convex, and the apex is much larger. GlESSTTLA AKOTTKTOiniirOENSIS, n. sp. Locality. Akouktoung on Irawady, Pegu {W. T. Blanford). Type. No. 2207.06.1.1 B.il. Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture scarcely any, just a trace near apex below the suture; colour umber-brown; spire long, sides flat, apex blunt ; suture impressed ; whorls 10, sides flatly convex ; aperture ovate. Size : maj. diam. 6-75 ; length 20*5 mm. This species occurred among the duplicates in the Blanford Collection. Compared with G. hasseinensis, it differs in sculpture, in colour, and the last whorl is more tumid in proportion to the length. Glessula peguemm, W. Blf. (Plate CLXII. figs. 20, 21.) Locality. Pegu. No. 8.9.3.15 {Hi/. Blanford). Original description : — " A. 2)cguensis, n. sp. Shell oblong ovate, rather solid, dark reddish brown, horny, marked wirh distinct and regular impressed lines. Spire convexly conical ; apex obtuse ; suture impressed, subcrenulate. AVhorls 6i, slightly convex; -the last ascending a little towards the mouth, and exceeding j of the shell in length; aperture vertical, truncately semicircular ; peri- stome obtuse, slightly thickened; margins joined by a callus; columella very much curved, projecting forwards at the base, sub- vertically truncated within the peristome. milliin, inch. " Length 7 0-28. Diameter 'd^ 0-14. Length of aperture 2| O'll. "Habitat. Irawady Valley, Pegu: common. " A pretty little sjiecies, darker in colour than anv of its allies, except perhaps A. gemma, Bens., and easily distinguished from all, by the columella being more arcuate, also by its more acuminate spire and blunter apex, and its much stronger sculpture." I give two figures of this shell, from authentic specimens in Hy. Blanford's Collection, as there is some variation in form. 56 LAND AND FRESHWATER In the Blaiiford Collection (No. 262.06.2.2) are three specimens from Arakan, near ToDgoop, much larger than the type described, being 10x4b mm., but they do not difler in any other respect, and may be considered a large variety. Glessula poNsiEiN'Bis, n. sp. (I'late CLXIV. fig. 19, apex.) Locality. Ponsee, Yunnan. Coll. Indian Museum {Dr. John Anderson). Shell oblong turreted, solid, smooth to eye ; apex very rounded with flattened sides ; sculjiluro : none discernible on the two apical whorls, slight stria; on 3rd regularly, distantly, and finely costulate on the 4th; colour pale ochraceous ; spire tapering, apex blunt, sides ver)- slightly convex ; suture shallow ; whorls 9, sides flatly convex ; aperture ovate, vertical ; peristome somewhat thickened ; columeliar margin strong, concave. Size: maj. diam. 7"75 ; alt. axis 20'0 mm. This is Slenoyyra (Glessula) jii/ramis, Bs., var. major, of Nevill, ' Hand-list,' i. p. 169, relerred to under G. pyramis by me. I am fortunate in getting the type-shells for examination. I always doubted the extension of G. pyramis so far to the eastward, when it had never occurred in the Naga Hills or Munipur, or even Eastern Assam. Glessula hlanfordiana,'Sex\W: Fousee (Dr. J. Anderson). lam able to state that this is No. 85 of Nevill's ' Hand-list,' p. 171, as entered in Geofl'rey Nevill's amended copy in his own handwriting ; that he did not at that time consider it had any close relationship to G. peguensis, is shown by the two lines crossed out, and " 6, Loc? coll. W. Theobald," Bhamao, is entered as the habitat. The type from Ponsee, Yunnan (Plate CLXIV. fig. 20, apex), has been sent me from Calcutta by the Director of the Zoological Survey of India, Dr. N. Annamiale, with one other example. This type is, I should say, abnormally thickened, particularly on the columella and tip of the peristome. Nevill's description is excellent. I closely compared these with the specimens also collected by Dr. John Anderson at Bhamao (Plate CLXIV. fig. 21, apex), six in number, and made drawings of their respective species, which show considerable variation not amounting to specific difference. The sculpture of the Ponsee shell is distinctly costulate, while it is very finely so in those from Bhamao (Plate CLXIV. fig. 21, apex), and this extends to the whole apex, as in the type (fig. 20). As Glessula 2>«guensis has been referred to as an allied species, I compared and figui'ed the apex, which is of very diflerent form and sculpture (Plate CLXIV. fig. 22, apex) — the specimen selected being one m the Wm. Blanford Collection from Tongoop, Arakau. Glessula limboegi, n. sp. (Plate CLXI. fig. 5.) Locality. Tenasserim (Ossian Limhorg). Shell elongately turreted, with shining surface ; sculpture : very MOLLUSOA OP INDIA. 57 rosular striation, less apparent on the last whorl : colour rich umber with a green tinge ; spire elongate, sides nearly dat ; apex somewhat attenuated, blunt ; suture shallow ; whorls 11, increasing very gradually in size, sides flattened, the last with a sign of a keel above the aperture ; aperture rather narrow, ovate, straight on inner margin ; outer lip flatly convex ; coluraellar margin sharply convex, then straight not solid, feeble truncation. Size : maj. diam. G'5 ; alt. axis 20 mm. This single specimen was among the shells collected by Mr. O. Limborg in 1877, and I name it after him ; it has remained un- described ever since. The species is of delicate form, and quite distinct from any Glessula 1 have from Pegu. Mr. Ossian Limborg was a particularly fine strong young mnn, son of a Swedish minister, and a keen naturalist. He arrived in Calcutta in the winter of 1876, and called on me one morning at the Museum anxious to collect and ex])lore anywhere. I took him up, and together with Lord Tweeddale, Dr. John Anderson, Superintendent of the Indian Museum, and Mr. Wood Mason, we fitted him out with all that was necessary and sent him to Moulmein to collect in Tenasserim, from whence be returned in May 1877, with an interesting lot of Birds, Mollusca, and Insects, which he was instructed to pav particular attention to. Very much material was obtained on the Peak of Mooleyit and its vicinity ; of the mollusca he brought back were some very interesting and valuable species preserved in spirits. I am sorry to say he suffered much from malarial fever and had to return to Europe, otherwise he was to liave been emplo} ed in some other parts of Burma. 7 a. Shan States and Slain Frontier. Glessula Iceiitiinqensis, n. sp. wuodtl'wrpi. n. sp. PI. CLXII. flg. 19. yuangcnsis, n. sp. PI. OLXII. fig. 18. feddeni, ii. sp. PI. CLXI.. fig. 15. feddeni, var. PI. CLXII. fig. U. ineditus, n. sp. perletis, u. sp. Glessula keniungensis, n. sji. Loealilii. Mong Sing, Siam Boundary (Lt.-Col. E. WoodfJiorjie, E.E.). type. No. 3650 B.M. Shell elongately turreted ; sculpture : smooth, with irregular subdued ribbiTig, showing stronger and curvilinear below the suture, ape.^ quite smooth, faint sculpture on 2nd and 3rd whorl.* ; colour dull ochraceous : sjiire elongate, flat-sided, apex very blunt. 58 LAND AND FRESHWATER largp ; suture well impressed ; whorls 9, sides nearly flat ; aperture small, ovate; cohimellar margin very convex. Size : maj. diam. 8'0 ; length 30'25 mm. This species was also found on the Mekong lliver, paler ia colour, with an ashy tint. No. 3748 B.M. Glessula woodthoepei, n. sp. (Plate CLXII. fig. 19.) Locality. Shan States. Nine specimens (Lt.-CoI.E. Woodthorpe). Type. No. 1628 B.M. Shell oblong conoid, shiny, very smooth ; sculpture : distant, rather coarse indistinct irregular strise; colour olivaceous; spire elongately conic, apex blunt ; suture well impressed ; whorls 7, gradually increasing, hody-whorl to length lOU : o5-6 : aperture ovate, vertical ; peristome outer tip thickened ; columeJlar margin slightly concave, short, strong, truncate. Size: m,<)j. diam. 5'75 : length 13'5 mm. This shell has a likeness to G. crassilabri.i, but the aperture is smaller in proportion to the length ; it is not so pointed in the spire, aud the sculpture is dilFerent. A specimen (bleached) No. 3655, is from the Siam N.W. boundarj-. Glessttla peddeni, n. sp. (Plate CLXII. fig. 15.) Localittj. fiha.n Wills (nin.BlanfordcolL). Type. No. 26 1.06.2.2. Shell elongately conoid, tumid, very glassy ; sculpture; rather distant striation, closer and stronger on the apical whorls ; colour rich ochre ; sjnre conic, flatly convex, apex blunt ; suture impressed ; whorls 7, sides convex, the last very ample; aperture oval; peristome outer lip thickened ; columellar margin short, with considerable convexity. Size : maj. diam. li-7o ; alt. axis 13'2 mm. „ „ 6-0 ; „ „ 1-1-75 mm. This is the shell Blanford refers to as perhaps distinct from cmssihibris, Bens., J. A. S. B. 1865, p. 95 ; it much resembles that species, but placed side by side the points of Viiriation are readily seen. Another single specimen (No. 41.06.3 3.) occurs in the Blanford collection, much more slender in form, but with similar sculpture, which I consider a variety (Plate CLXIII. fig. 14). Glasstjla ineditcs, n. sp. Locality. Shan Hills. Three specimens not named (TF. T. Blan- ford collection). Type. No. 88.06.5.5. Shell oblong turreted ; sculpture: transverse close regular raise! striation, embryonic whorls smooth; colour: the tvpe and best preserved rich ochraoeous on last whorl ; spire elongate, sides flat ; suture impressed; whorls 7, regularly increasing, slightly convex; aperture ovate, small ; peristome outer margin thickened ; columellar margin short, terminating abruptly. Size: maj. diam. 4'o; alt. axis 9"5 mm. MOI.LUSCA OF INDIA. 69 This species was found quite recently (July 1919) in a pill-box labelled " Shan Hills," to,s;ether with another very distinct species and a Bithijnia, July 1919. It thus remained unsorted and un- noticed for so many years, until my attention was called to the Mollusca of the Salween Valley. Glesstjla. peklevis, n. sp. Locality. Shan Hills, five specimens (2 mature) {W. T. Blan- fonl collei-tioii). Type. No. 89.06.5. (J. Shell ovately oblong ; sculpture : smooth on last whorl, only a trace of transverse striation on other whorls, and distant, high- power, close, spiral striation; colour dull umber-brown; spire short, sides flatly convex, apex rounded, very blunt; suture impressed; whoiU 6, flatly convex, last the largest; aperture ovate or semicircular, outer margin evenly convex, vertical ; peristome ouler lip thickened; columellar margin short, strong, concave. Size: maj. diam. 4-75; alt. axis 9-5 mm. This species recalls G. pegwnsis in its shape and blunt apex, but its colour and great smoothness distinguishes it at once. It probably comes from the Shan States near Mandalay and was collected by Tedden. Glessitla tuangensis, n. sp. (Plate CLXII. fig. 18.) Locality. Yuang Ha, Siam boundary, only one specimen {Lt.- Col. li. Woodthorpe). Shell oblong turreted or conoid ; sculpture : strong regular distant striae, approaching costulation ; colour ochraceous ; spire elongately conic, apex very blunt and rounded ; suture impressed ; whorls 7, sides flatly convex, 100 : 47; aperture narrowly ovate; peristome outer lip thickened ; columellar margin very slightly convex, strongly truncate. Size : maj. diam. 6 ; alt. axis 12'8 mm. I was alyirst inclined to consider this a variety of woodtliorpei, but it differs in many respects, in the proportion of the body-whorl to the height, the strong sculpture as compared with the smoothness and the difterence in the aperture. A single bleached shell from the Kentung State (No. 1156 B.5I.) is near this. Glesstjla latestkiaia, Mollendorft". Localitif. Shan States. This I have never seen. 60 LAND AND FRESBWATER Glessula (Rishetia) stjndeki, n. sp. ] Locality. Amin Gaon, Gowliathi, Assam. Only one example {Sander Lall Hoi-a). Type in Indian Museum, Calcutta. Shell very elongately turretcd ; sculpture : smooth to eye, rather distant striation in low relief, the first two embryonic whorls smooth ; colour pale umber-brown ; spire long, very regularly tapering, apex fine; suture well impressed; whorls 14-, sides fiatly convex, proportion of last whorl to length, 100 : 32-o ; aperture narrowly ovate ; peristome simple, thin ; columellar margin concave, sharply truncate. Size: maj. diam. 9'0 ; alt. axis Wo mm. This is a beautiful and new species, the single specimen is in most perfect state. Its nearest ally is G. haculina, Hy. lihuidford, of Darjiling, compared with which it differs in its greater length and number of whorls, 14 to lc5, and general tumidity, more convex whorls, with suture more impressed, sculpture not so full, side of spire not so straight and flat, last whorl larger and more swollen. Compared with G. suhaculina, G.-A., of the Khasi Hills and South Jaintia, another near ally, it differs considerably as follows: It is much longer, 14 whorls to 12, length 41 to 34-75 mm.; more alternate with finer apex ; tapering very regularly, side of spire quite straight : sculpture far less pronounced; columellar margin shorter and with more convexity. Considerable interest is attached to the finding of this Ghssula at Amin Gaon. 4(i0 yards from the llailway Station, where Sunder Lall of the Indian lluseum, returning from Munipur, was detained for six hours ; he made the best of the opportunity, obtaining at the same time six specimens of another Glessula, a variety of sarissa. Regarding tlie range of 6r. baculiiui. it is of interest; 400 miles east of Darjiling, at the base of the Dafla Hills, 450 feet, I found tliat G. harmutliensis took its place ; the apcc is more obtuse and the sculpture is very different from that of Hy. Blan ford's species. It comes from a low elevation compared with Darjiling ; Harmutti is some 150 miles east from Gowhathi ; 50 milts north of that place, near Dewangiri, at the base of the Bhutan Hills, the Datta species, or one very close to it, in all probability is' to be found, indicative of the area and side from which G. sunderi was derived. The intrusive granite at (iowhathi extends thence for some distance north, exposed and rising at intervals above the deep alluvial of the Bramaputra, which evidentl}' covers much more, pointing to a once close connection of low liilly country, by which land-moUusca could travel far out into the plain of Assam. Such former connection with the Assam Kango or the Khasi and Garo Hills is more pronounced between Gowhathi and Dubri, trending towards the great mass of granite of Gipmochi Peak into the Western Bhutan Hills (see also page 11). MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 61 I have not hitherto seen auy elongate Glessula {Uishetia') of the bitcidiiia t5'pe from so low au elevation as Gowhathi (only about iiuU feet) and so far from the base of the eastern Himalaya, all have come from quite high habitats of 3-501)0 feet. This is not surprising when we cousider that from Gowhathi westward up to the Garo Hills, an area of 135 miles by 32, or over 4100 sq. miles, no land- rnoUusca have been collected, until the high ground in the Khasi Hills is reached, where O. sahhacvlina is abundant. Eastward it is the same up to the Mikir Hills, a tract mostly of hill-country, G-i miles long by 32 broad or some 2000 sq. miles. North of the Erahinaputra, for the distance of 190 miles, another 6000 sq. niilfs, no collecting has been made. I trust Sunder Lall will before long be given the opportunity of collecting all along the line of the Assam railway and visit places contiguous to it, particularly tlie isolated low granite hills nortli of the Brahmaputra River. Glessula bukrailensis, G.-A., var. maxwelli, G.-A. Locality. Somra Tracts, Somra Khulen Post, Upper Burma, 8.-1.19. About L. 25° 20' N., L. 90° 45' E. No. 3742 B.M. Shell elongate cylindro-conoid, turreted, solid, rather shining ; sculpture : on the protocouch ribbing, approaching fine costulation, merges into finer, more irregular, and curvilinear un the succeeding wliorls ; just below tlie sutui'e this sculpture is stronger, giving the appearance of crenulation ; colour a rich ochre, some are chestnut; spire long, gradually increasing, sides with slight convexit}', apex blunt; suture moderately impressed; whorls 10|, flatly convex, tlie last the largest ; aperture oval, rather narrow for size, milky white within ; peristome outer margin well thickened, white ; columella strong, concave, truncate. Size; maj. diam. lO'O ; alt. axis 32'75 mm. The longest and ) „ „. „., . most attenuate } " " ^ ^5 ; „ „ 33-5 mm. This very interesting shell was collected by Captain L. R. Maw- son, 1st Lushai Hills Battalion, Assam Eifles, and is a more attenuate form of 0. hiirrailensis from the Naga Hills, this easterly locality extending the range to the hill-slopes of the Kyengdwen Valley. 62 LAND AKD fRESHWATER EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLIX. Fig. 1. Giessiila {Rishetia) longispira, n. sp. 2. ( ) , n. sp. 3. ( ) ienuispira, Bs. 4. ( ) suhamtlina, n. sp. 6. ( ) hannuttiensisj n. sp. 6. ( ) rissomensis, n. sp. 7. ( ) baculiiia, H. Bll. (Type). 8. ( ) canaraense, n. sp. ? 9. ( ) suhaculina, n. sp. 10. ( ) mmiipurense, n. sp. 11. ( ) t/aroeime, n. sp., small var. 12. ( ) $trame/ico/&r, n. sp. 13. ( ) bacidma,l[l. Blf'., \nr.,ea-ilis. 14. ( ) (Type). 15. ( ) garoense, n. sp. (Type). Eishettchu, Siklnra. X i^.-;. Kaslicliu, ijikbirn. X 1-50. Teria Gliat, Kbasi. X „ Khasi Hills. X „ Dulla Hills. X „ Daiiisaug, Sikliim. X „ Darjiliiig. X lo. N. C'anara. X ll.'5. Norl!) Khasi. X loO. Muuipur. X „ Naraiiidbur, Cnebar. X „ Naga Hills, X „ Iiamsang, Sililjim. X „ Rissom I'eak, SikUim. X „ Gam Hills. X „ EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLX. Fig. 1. Glcssula{Stshetia)burraUensis,G.-A. (J-'ype). 2. ( ) . 5. ( ) muxwelli, n. sp. ( 1 st Type). 6. ( ) . l-'..(l T^pe). V. ( ) dikrangeme, u. sp. ochracea, n. sp. hutlerl, G.-A. maiamensis, n. sp. (Type). , n. sp. (Type). iUusiris, G.-A. (Type). , var. lumida, G.-A. crassilabris, Bs. oakesi, n. sp. ta. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. crassilabris, Bs. (Typical). 18. . 20. 21. 22. 23! 24. rabani, n. sp. (Jadukamia) abnormis, n. sp. pyramis, Bs. 1-50. KhunboPk.,NagaHills. X 1-25, Japvo Pk., ,, KopMiiiedzaPk., „ Naga Hills. DaflaHills. Sikbim. Naga Hills. Patkai Range. Siugpbo Hills. Heiigdan Peak, Naga. Jaintia. N. Kliasi. Abor Hills. Braiiiakiind, E. Assam. Teria Gbat, Kbasi. Jaintia Hills. Sbeugork Peak, Bada Hills. Garo Hills. Cbittagong. £hasi Hills. Dafla Hills. Teria Gbat, Ebasi. X „ X „ X 3. X „ X loO. 1-50. EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLXI. Fig. 1. Glessula (Rishetia) pertenids, W. Blf, 2. - ■ ~ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Pegu. Henzada, Pegu ) basseinensis, n. sp. Bassein, „ )pcrteimis,'W. Bll'., largevar. Tbyetmyo -)• -) limborgi, n. sp. -) suhhcbes, n. sp. (Type). Teiiasserim. Dafla Hills. Naga, Assam. Kobliagur, near T'ezpur, Assam X 1-5. X „ X „ X „ X „ X 2. X 1-5. X „ X „ MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 63 Fig. 10. Glessula {RisJietia) sarissa, Bs. Lower Bengal, X 2. 11. ( ) neviliiana, n. sp. Dafla Hills. X „ 12. ( ) • .) 1) X „ 13. ( ) • X 2-5. 14. ( ) masters^, n. sp. „ „ X 2. 15. ( ) forum, n. sp. Cbittagong. X 1-5, l(i. ( ) hastula, Bs. Darjiling. X 2. 17. ( ) (Typical). ,, X ,, 18. ( ) siMtastuLa, n. sp. (Type). North Khasi. X „ 19. ( ) , Tar. (Typej. ., „ X „ 20. ( ) , „ . „ Muniptir. X „ 21. ( — — ) shiroiensis, ii. sp. ,, X „ 22. ( ). n. sp. ,, X „ 2.3.' ( ) lahiipaensis, n. sp. ,, X „ 21. ( ) kohimaensis, n. sp. Naga Hills. X „ 2.5. ( ) Ihotaensis, n. sp. Lhota, Naga Hills. X „ 2fi. gemma. Bo. Khoostia, Bengal. X „ 27. (sub-genus?) J „ Bengal (authentic). X „ 28. „ Chandanagur. X „ 29. „ Tar. Cbittagong. X „ Fig. 1. o 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLXII. Gkssula [Eisheiia) mastersi,-a. sp, (Type). Assam. ( )siibhebes,Gr.-A.(ja.r.tumida). Golaghat, Naga. ( -) , „ Naga. ( ) aboreiisis, G.-A. Abor Hills. orobia, Bs. Darjiling. (Type). (var. major), Eichila Pk., Sikhim. solida, n. sp. North Khasi. crassula, Bs., Tar. Sikbim. oglei, n. sp. Naga Hills. ■ bara/ceiisis, n. sp. - prowiensis, n. sp. -feddeni, n. sp., var. haiileyi, ti. sp. - barakensis, u. sp. - yuangensis, n. ep. - woodtkorpei, n. sp. - peguensis, W. Bit'. - crassilabris, Bs. (Tar. nana). - rar/uensts, n. ep. - imphcdensis, n. sp. - crassula, Rt6. (Type). - hebitata, n. sp. Muuipur (Type). Shan States. North Khasi. Naga. Shan States. Tliyotmyo, Pegu. North Khasi. Sikbim. Muni pur. Darjiling. Muuipur. X 1-50. X „ X „ X „ X 2. X „ X X X X X X X X X „ X 2. X „ X 15. X „ X 2. X „ X 2. X 1-5. X „ X 2. X 1-5. 1-5. 1-50. 1-50. 1-50 EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLXIII. (Enlargements of original Drawings.) Fig. 1. Glessula botellus, Bs. Nilgbiris. 2. oakesi, G.-A. (Type). Abor Hills. 3. — ; — botellus, Bs., of i'reston. „ ,, 4. prowiensis, n. sp, {orobia, Becldome).Naga Hills. 0. subjerdoniJieAdi.iy&r. minor, sub- Jeypur. Jerdoiii ofNeTill). 6. . TinnoTelly Hills. 7. , Golcontla. X X X X X X X 12-5. 64 LAND AND FRESHWATER Fig. 8. Glessula orohia, Bs. Darjiling. X 12-5. 9. {Risheiia) hastu/a, Bs. „ X „ 9 a. , ( ) (apex more enlarged) M X 24. 10. ( ) roherti, n. sp. Richila, Sikliira. X „ n. ( ) subhastiila, a. sp. Korth Khasi. X 12-5. 12. ( ) (var.). North Cachar. X „ 12a. ,, ,, X 24. 13. ( ) subhastiila, var. Munipur. X 12 S. 13a. ( ) • „ X 24. 14. subkastula, n. sp. CherraPoonjee, Khasi . X „ 15. (Type). North Khasi. X 24. 10. {Sishetia) sarissa, Bs. (var.). Burroi Gorge, Dafia. X 12-.5. 17. ( ) (far-)- Goyvliathi. X „ 18. ( ) (Typical). Jessore. X „ 19. • ( ) (var.). Koliagliur, Tezpur, Assam. X „ 20. ( ) mastersi, n. sp. (Type). Golaghat, Assam. X „ •-'I. ( ) (var.). Augaolno Pk., Naga. X „ -2 ( ) ■ Golughat, Assam. X „ EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLXIV. (Original drawings all X 12-5 and reduced \.) Fig. 1. Glessula swbhebes (Type). 3. austeniana, Neyill (Type). 4. {Risheiia) dihbigemis, n. f-p. 5. ( ) garoense, n. sp. (Type). 6. . ( ) (small yar.V 7. ( ) macera, W. I31f. MS. (Type). 8. munipurensis (Type). 9. prijwiensis. 10. {Risheiia) periemiis (large yar.). 11. ( ) • 12. ( ) hasseinensis, n. sp. 13. crassula (large yar.). 14. (Typical). 15. (yar. with incised lines). 16. crassilabris, Bs. 17. 18. (small var.). 19. ponsiensis, n. sp. pyramis (yar. major), JJeyill. 20. • blanfordiana (Type), X 12. 21. ,X12. 22. peguensis, W. Blf. 23. pyramis, Bs. Dafla Hills. Abor Hills. Dafla. Sonari Tea Garden, Assam. Garo Hills. Cachar. Assam. Munipur. Naga Hills. Tliyetmyo, Pegu. Pegu. Bussein, Pegu. Darjiling. Earhichu, Sikhim. Teria Ghat, Khasi. Dafla Hills. Naga Hills. Ponsee, Yunnan. Bauiao, Burma. Arakan. Teria Ghat. Fig. 1. lo. 16. Ic. EXPLANATION OF PLATE CLXV. Glessula {Risheiia) longispira, n. sp. Eisetchu, Sikhim. Aperture, with foot protruding, X 8. [rdl-ldl, right and left dorsal lobes, cp, fleshy colunicllar pillar upon and around which the columellar margin is built. s, peristome.] Generative organs, X 4'5. Penis of 2nd specimen examined. The yisceral sac, showing coils, back and front views. MOLLTJSCA OF INDIA. 65 Glessula ochracca, G.-A. Sikliim. 2 A. Aperture with foot protruding, sho^riiig sole of foot, X 4. 2 B. Buccal mass, with ijitestiiie and salivary glands, X 8. 2 C. Genitalia nearly complete, X 4-5. Glessula oaiesi, G.-A. Abor Hills. 3 A. Side of foot, X 6. , ., , , f ..a 3 B. Albumen gland, hermaphrodite duct, and oviduct to vas deterens, X b. 3C. Vas delerens to penis, X 6. 3D. „ „ another Tiew, X 6. Glessula orohia, Bs. 4. Generative organs, X 8. 4 a. Penis, with iSagellum, X 12, 4 6. „ another view, X 8. Glessula inortiaia, Pfr. 5. Part of genitalia, X 4-5. 5a. ,. ,, another view, x 45. 5 *. Penis, coiled view of, X 4'5. 5 c. Jaw, X 24. Glessula garoense, n. sp. Silchar, Cachar. 6. Penis, with simple flagellum, X 12. 6 a. Speruiatheca, X 12. Glessula species ? Buddula, Ceylon. 7. Penis, to show flagellum, X 8. la. ,, view of other side, X 8. 7 b. Follicles of the prostate, X 24. PAET I. m v'6iMi«»»Ayiii,-i,d«w)m«Miii«fWr'. vMttM»i f< tumwimummmmntMt PART I.] [NOVEMBER 1920, LAND AND FRESHWATER MOLLTJSCA OF INDIA, INCLUDING SOUTH ARABIA, BALUCHISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, KASHMIR, NEPAL, BURMAH, PEGU, TENASSERIM, ■ MALAY PENINSULA, CEYLON, AND OTHER ISLANDS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN. SUPPLEMENTAEY TO MESSRS. THEOBALD AND HANLEY'S CONCHOLOGIA INDICA. BY LiEUT.-CoLONEL H. H. GODWIN-AUSTEN, F.R S., F.R.G.S., F.Z.S., &c., LATE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT TOPOGRAPH ICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, IN CHARGE OF THE KHASI, GARO, AND NAGA-HILLS SURVEY PARTY. Vol. III. PLATES. a' LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 1920. TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, PBINTKES,] [BED LION COURT, FLEET STREET, .u,- Plate CLIX. 11 12 13 14 15 J S. Gladstone. Photo. GLESSULA. Watfot'd Engraving Coy Collotype. PLATE CLIX. [Part I.— November 1920.] Fig. 1. Glessula (Rishetia) longispira, n. sp. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. -) . u- sp. — ) TENUISPIRA, Bs. — ) SUBACULINA, 11. sp. — ) HARMUTTIENSIS, 11. Sp. — ) RISSOMENSIS, 11. sp. -) BACULiNA, H. Blf. (Type). -) CANARAENSE, 11. Sp. ? -) SUBACULINA, 11. Sp. -) MUNIPURENSE, n. Sp. -) GAROENSE, n. sp., small var. -) STRAMENCOLOR, H. sp. -) BACULiNA, H. Blf., var. exilis. -) , „ „ (Type). -) GAROENSE, 11. sp. (Type). Rishettchu, Sikliim. X 1-.25 Raslichu, Sikhim. X 1-50 Teria Ghat, Khasi. X J3 Khasi Hills. X ?J Dafla Hills. X J) Damsaiig, Sikhim. X >} Darjiling. X 1-5. N. Cauara. X 1-25. North Khasi. X 1.50. Muaipur. X J5 Naraiiidhur, Cachar. X •i Naga Hills. X J> Damsang, Sikhim. X 55 Rissom Peak, Sikhim. X }y Garo Hills. X Plate CLX. I 12 I 17 13 19 ^^- J. S. Gladstone. Photcx 7a 22 23 ^*^i«' lii 14 18 20 i 1 ^ 15 i 24 I « 11 16 21 GLESSULA. Watford Engraving Coy. Collotype. PLATE CLX. [Part I.— November 1920.] Fig. 1. Glessula (Rishetia) burrailensis, G.-A. (Type). 2. ( ) . 3, ( ) . 4. ( ) .. 5. ( ) MAXWELLi, 11. sp. (l.-t Type). 6. f ) . (2nd Type). 7. ( ) DIKKANGENSE, 11. Sp. 7a. ( ■) . 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. OCHRACEA, n. sp. BUTLERl, G.-A. MAIAMENSIS, n. sp. (Ty[)p). , n. sp. (Typej. iLLUSTRis, G.-A. (Type). , var. TUMiPA, (t.-A. CiiASSILABRIS, Bs. 15. OAKESl, n. sp. 16. . 17. cRASsiLABRis, B?. (Typical). 18. . 19. . 20. . 21. - RABANI, n. sp. 22. (Jadukamja) abnormis, n. sp. 2.3. ( ) . 24. PYRAiiis, Bs. Kliuuho Pk.jNaga Hills. X 1-25 '5 )5 X ;) Japvo Pk., >i X Kopamcdza Pk. 1 ^) X J Naga Hills. X jj X Dafla Hills. X l-c 0 }j X } Sikhim. X 3 Naga Hills. X Patkai Range. X , Singpho Hills. X J Heugdan Peak, Naga. X J Jaintia. X i N. Khasi. X 2. Abor Hills. X 1 50 Bramakuiid, E. Assam. X if Teria Ghat, Khasi. X 2. Jaintia Hills. X i> Sheiigork Peak X >) Dafla Hills. Garo Hills. X Jj Chittagong. X 5? Khasi Hills. X 3. Dafla Hills. X >t Teria Ghat, Khasi. X IT 0 Plate CLXI. 1 s ■t * i I k m 11 'lt*> Ih 26 I 17 23 I 18 22 < 24 28 27. ^^t 20 19 29 J. S Gladstone Photo- GLESSULA. Watford Encraving Coy. Collotype. PLATE CLXI. [Part I.— November 1920.] Fig. 1. Glessula (Rishetia) pertenuis, W. Blf. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. BASSEINENSIS, 11. sp. PERTENCis, W. Blf., large var. LIMBORGI, n. sp. suBHEBESj n. sp. (Type). SARISSA, Bs. NEVILLIANA, n. sp. MASTERSI, n, sp. FORUM, n. sp. HASTULA, Bs. (Typical). SUBHASTULA, n. Sp. , var. (Type). (Type). SHIROIENSIS, n. sp . n. sp. LAHUPAENSIS, n. Sp. KOHIMAENSIS, D. Sp. LHOTAENSIS, U. Sp. r GEMMA, Bo. 27. (sub-gei>us ?) i 28. 'l 29. L Pegu. X ] 5 Henzada, Pegu. X )9 Bassein, „ X )> Thyetmyo. X 51 Tenasserim. X 1? Dafla Hills. X 2. Naga. X 1-5 Assam. X )7 Kohliagur, X >} near Tezpur, Assam. Lo^er Bengal. X 2. Dafla Hills. X jj sy )5 X •} )) a X 2-5 JS 35 X 2. Chittagong. X 15 Darjiling. X 2. )) X i-> North Khasi. X ?■) JJ 39 X }•> Munipur. X JJ 3) X TJ )) X ;■) 3) X ?i Naga Hills. X .^ Lhota, Naga Hills. X •>y Khoostia, Bengal. X 1^ Bengal (authentic). X }■> Chandanagur. X jj Chittagong. X Plate CLXII. I t 25 li I 10 11 * 24 12 13 14 16 'J 18 19 15 ^ 26 22 23 I 17 20 21 % ■i. S. GludBtone. Photo- GLESSULA. Watford Enrravine Coy Collotype PLATE CLXII. [Part I.— November 1920.] Fig. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Glessula (Rishetia) mastersi, n. sp. (Type). ( ) suBHEBEs, G.-A. (var. tumida). ( ) , ( ) ABORENSIS, G.-A. OROBIA, Bs. (Type). (var. m.\jor). soLiDA, n. sp. CRASSULA, Bs., var. OGLEI, n. sp. BARAKENSIS, n. sp. PROWiENSis, n. sp. FEUDENi, n. sp., var. HAA'LEYI, n. sp. BARAKENSIS, 11. Sp. YUANGENSISj n. sp. WOODTHORPEI, 11. sp. PEGUENSIS, W. Bit'. cRASsiLABRis, Bs. (var. nana). RARHIENSIS, n. Sp. IMPHALENSIS, n. Sp. CRASSULA, Rve. (Type). HEBITATA, U. Sp. Assam. X 1-50. Golaghat, Naga. X „ Naga. X „ Abor Hills. X „ Darjiling. X 2. !> X „ Ricliila Pk., Sildiim. X 15. North Khasi. X 2. Sikhim. X „ Naga Hills. X 1-50. !J ^1 X „ Munipur (Type). X ;j 7 J X 1-50, Shan States. X 1-50, )3 7) X „ North Khasi. X 2. Naga. X ,, Shan States. X -15. !' » X » Thyetmyo, Pegu. X 2. 33 33 X „ North Khasi. X 2. Sikhim. X 1-5. Munipur. X „ Darjiling. X 2. JMunipur. X 1-6. Plate CLXIII. n I:- 9 /~^ 10 9a ( ' 13 14 ifimi'^ 7 /% ;^^ { '■ m 12 I 12a &_- A I 6 ISrt ) J 17 X'' / 1 19 20 21 I'-S^V £\. 22 ,^^ Lt.-Col. H. H. Godwin-Aiisten del. GLESSULA, F. W. Reader, Sculp PLATE CLXIir. [Part l.—N'ovember 1920.] [Enlargements of origiaal Drawings.] Fig. ] . Glessula botellus, Bs. 2. OAKEsi, G.-A. (Type). 3. BOTELLUS, Bs., of Preston. 4. PROwiENsis, n. sp. (oROBiA, Beildome). 5. suBJERDONi, Bedd. (var. minor, sub- jERDONi of Nevili). 6, . 8. - 9. - 9a. ■ 10. - 11. ( ) SUBHASTULA, n. Sp. 12. ( ) (var.). Ua. ( ) . 13. ( ) SUBHASTULA, var. 13 a. ( ) . 14, SUBHASTULA, n. sp. 15. (Type). OROBIA, Bs. (Rishetia) hastula, Bs. • ( ) (apex more enlarged). • ( ) ROBERTI, n. sp. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. (Rishetia) sabissa, Bs. (var.). — ( ) (var.). — ( ) (Typical). ~ ( ) (var.). ■ ( ) mastersi, n. sp. (Type). , ( ) (var.). ( ) . Nilgliiris. X 12-5 Abor Hills. X )) J) >> X J; Naga Hills. X )! Jeypur. X }: Tinnevelly Hills. X 55 Golconda. X >t Darjiling. X )> >> X )' >' X 24. Richila, Sikliim. X ?) North Kliasi. X 12-5 North Cachar. X Ji )j j> X 24. Munipur. X 12-5, )? X 24. Cherra Poonjee, Kliasi. X )1 North Khasi. X 24. Burroi Gorge, Dafla. X 12-5 Gowhathi. X Jessore. X Koliaghur, Tezpur, X )J Assam. Golaghat, Assam. X n Angaolno Peak, Naga. X 5» Golaghat, Assam. X fi Plate CLXU' 13 .^. .>:..,-,r-y ^- I*. -It. #■ \ -J. 14 »^ -■« 10 1 .>' II ' - 12 If- --^ 15 -ssr 16 17 ^' 19 --f- J' 20 21 22 Lt -Col H. H. Godwin-Austen, del. GLESSULA. F. W Reader. Sculo- PLATE CLXiy [Part L— November 1920.] (Original drawings all x 12-5 and reduced ^.) Fis . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. C. 7 . 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Glessula subhebes (Type). - AusTENiANA, Nevill (Typc). - (RiSHETIa) DIHINGENSIS, U. sp, ■ ( ) GAROENSE, u. sp. (Type). - ( •) (small var.). ■ ( ) MACERA, W. Blf. MS. (Type). MUNiPURENsis (Type). • PROWIENSIS. • (Rishetia) pertenuis (large var.). ■ ( ) . ■ ( ) BASSEINENSIS, U. Sp. ■ CRAssuLA (large var.). (Typical). (var. with incised lines). • CRASSILABRIS, Bs. (small var.). PONsiENsis, n. sp. PYRAMis (var. major), Nevill. BLANFORDIANA (Type), X 12. , X 12. PEGUENSIS, W. Blf. PYKAMIS, Bs. Dafla Hills. Abor Hills. Dafla. Sonari Tea Garden, Assam. Garo Hills. Cachar. Assam. Muuipur. Naga Hills. Tbyetuiyo, Pegu. Pegu. Bassein, Pegu. Darjiling. Rarhichu, Sikhim. Teria Ghat, Khasi. Dafla Hills. Naga Hills. Pousee, Yunuan. Bamao, Burma. Arakaii. Teria Ghat. Plate CLXV 12 '7 ;?..(^>=, GLESSULA. H- H. Godwin-Austen, dtl- Watford Engraving Coy-. Sculp- PLATE CLXV. [Part l.~November 1920.] Glessula (Rishetia) longispira, n. sp. Risetchu, Sikhira. Fig. 1. Aperture, with foot protruding, X 8. \j-dl-ldl, right and left dorsal lobes, cp, fleshy columellar pillar upon and around which the columellar margin is built, s, peristome.] 1 a. Generative organs, x 4'5. 1 b. Penis of 2nd specimen examined. 1 c. The visceral .sac, showing coils, back and front views. Glessula ochracea, G.-A. Sikhim. 2 A. Aperture with foot protruding, showing sole of foot, x 4. 2 B. Buccal mass, with intestine and salivary glands, x 8. 2 C. Genitalia nearly complete, x 4"3. Glessula oakesi, G.-A. Abor Hills. 3 A. Side of foot, x 6. 3 B. Albumen gland, hermaphrodite duct, and oviduct to vas deferens, x 6. 3 C. Vas deferens to penis, X 6. 3D. „ „ another view, x 6. Glessula orobia, Bs. 4. Generative organs, x 8. 4 a. Penis, with flagellum, x 12. 46. • ,, another view, x 8. Glessula inornata, Pfr. 5. Part of genitalia, X 45. 5 a. „ J, another view, x 4"5. 5 b. Penis, coiled view of, x 4'5. 5 c. Jaw, X 24. Glessula garoensb, n. sp. Silchar, Cachar. 6. Penis, with simple flagellum, x 12. 6 a. Spermatheca, x 12. Glessula species ? Buddula, Ceylon. 7. Penis, to show flagellum, x 8. 7 a. „ view of other side, x 8. 7 b. Follicles of the prostate, X 24. University of Toront Library Acme Library CardPccket Made by LIBRARY BUREAI