t i - LAY SUBSIDY ROLL FOR THE COUNTY OF WORCESTER, Circ. 1280. EDITED FOR THE WORCESTERSHIRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY BY J. W. WILLIS BUND AND JOHN AMPHLETT, M.A. $rinte0 for tfje SHorcestersfjtre Historical Society BY JAMES PARKER AND CO., OXFORD. 1893- INTRODUCTION. THIS Subsidy Roll is, it is believed, the earliest extant record of a lay taxation of moveables for the County of Worcester. Its date, for the reasons given below, is somewhere between 1276 1282. As, unfortunately, the title of the Roll is lost, it is impossible to fix the date with absolute certainty. The Roll belongs to Sir Edmund Lechmere, M.P. ; it was found among the papers of his ancestor, Sir Nicholas, afterwards Mr. Baron Lechmere. He was born in 1613, the year of the murder of his maternal uncle, Sir Thomas Overbury. He was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple in 1641. He took an active part on the side of the Parliament against the King. He signed the summons to the Governor to surrender the City of Worcester to the Parliamentarians in 1646, and after its surrender, in July of that year, was one of the Committee for governing the City. In 1648 he was elected the Member of Par- liament for Bewdley, and kept his seat during the rest of the Long Parliament. He was one of the Members for Worcester in Crom- well's second and third Parliaments. He took an active part with regard to the Petition and Advice. For this he had his reward by being promoted to be Attorney- General for the Duchy of Lancaster. Before Charles II. left Breda for England, Lechmere obtained a pardon. For some time after the Restoration he devoted himself to his profession, and for a considerable period obtained neither office nor honours. At length, after the Revolution of 1688, he had his reward. In 1689, when he was 76 years old, he was made a Baron of the Exchequer and knighted. He was on the bench eleven years, until 1700, when, being 87, he resigned, and retired to Hanley, where he died in 1701. It is most likely that, when engaged either for Cromwell in some of his schemes to raise money, or while he was a Baron of the Exchequer, he obtained the Roll from the Ex- chequer for some purpose, and it was not returned. Although Nash is said to have had access to the papers of the Judge when writing his History of Worcestershire, he does not seem to have A 2 IV INTRODUCTION. made any use of this Roll, and it has never yet been published. Its chief value consists in the insight it gives into the state of the county at the end of the thirteenth century. It is also important as shewing the population of the different vills throughout the county, the origin of the names of persons and places, and the light it gives on the growth of surnames. Among other matters on which we get hitherto unknown details are : i. The size of the vills. Assuming all the householders to have been taxed towards the subsidy, and it is fairly certain all freemen would have been, those who would not be included being mostly servants or serfs of the landowners, and who had no property to be taxed, the Roll shews the number of householders in the county, and enables a comparison to be made of the size and importance of the different places, from the amount at which they were taxed. For instance, it will be found that the Boroughs of Worcester, Droit- witch, Dudley, Kidderminster, and Evesham had the following number of persons taxed, and at the following sums : Persons. Taxation. s. d. Worcester ... 314 ... 88 3 4 Droitwich ... 87 ... 26 13 2 Dudley .., 41 ... 674 Kidderminster 58 ... 954 Evesham ... 91 ... 45 3 I It will be thus seen, that while in numbers and value Worcester was far away the most important town in the county, yet that Evesham came next, and Droitwich, in point of numbers, was not far behind Evesham, a remarkable proof of the extent and value of the salt trade, while what is now the county borough of Dudley, the most populous town in the county, was then the least im- portant. If the number of persons are taken to represent house- holders, as may well be the case, the Roll gives the population, counting five to a house, as follows : Worcester ... ... 1,57 Droitwich ... ... 435 Dudley ... ... ... 205' Kidderminster ... ... 290 Evesham ... ... 455 INTRODUCTION. v The Roll also gives some interesting particulars as to Worcester. The city was then divided into seven wards. Six of these cor- respond in name to six of the existing city parishes ; but the seventh, "Alta Warda," is difficult to identify. It was the most populous, and the richest of all the city Wards. The figures for Worcester, taking the number of persons mentioned as being each householders, and counting five to a house, are No* of Popu- Households. lation. Amount of Tax. ' S. d. St. Clement's Ward 12 60 17 4 All Saints 64 320 10 14 6 St. Nicholas 25 125 468 St. Martin 44 220 13 II 2 St. Peter 39 195 234 High Ward (Alta Warda) 78 390 41 11 o St. Andrew 52 260 14 19 4 3H 1570 88 3 4 The total given m the Roll as the amount of the subsidy is 89 8s. id. ; whether this was a tenth or fifteenth, or what other figure, is not known. It is impossible, therefore, to get at the amount of the wealth of Worcester, as we do not know what fraction the .88 represents of the whole sum. 2. The next matter the Roll brings out is the number of the Hundreds, and the places contained in each. In Domesday, it is said that there are twelve hundreds in the county, and the names of seven are given Came, Clent, Cresslau, Dodintret, Esch, Fisberge, and Oswaldeslaw. The Roll divides the county into five hundreds, namely Halfshire (Dimidium Comitatus), Oswaldeslaw, Dodingtree, Blakenhurst, Pershore. It would be a very interesting and instruc- tive piece of county history to take the places in the Domesday hun- dreds, those named in the Roll, and those in the modern hundreds, to compare them, and to note the change in the boundaries of the hundreds, only it would be too long for this Introduction. 3. It would seem from the Roll that at the close of the thirteenth century the parochial division of the county had not become com- pletely recognised. Domesday had proceeded on a manorial division. The Roll proceeds on the division into vills, which may or not be parishes. As it often happens, several of them are included in one DA INTRODUCTION. modern parish. This seems to point to the fact that the boundaries of the parishes, as we know them, are much later than is usually believed to be the case. 4. As to place-names, many are taken from the landowners. At Newynton we find a Beauchamp, at the Shelsleys a Walsh and a Beauchamp respectively, at Brocton a Hacch' (Hacket) ; at Sapye a Pichard, and at two of the Redmarleys an Olwar (Olistard) and a Beauchamp. At Elmley Lovett there was a Lovet ; Bentley Paunce- foot was then called Bentley, the great landowner being Grymbald Pauncefot, taxed at two marks ; at Hampton there was also a Lovet. At Croome d'Abbitot dwelt Osbert de Abbetot ; at Croome Simon, Simon de Cromb, and curiously enough, at Imenyes (Impney) there was William Corbet. The list might be indefinitely extended. 5. The Roll gives some clue to the value of the moveable property of the different landowners. Domesday gives the places where they held land, with the extent of taxable land, and its estimated rent. But the Roll gives some clue to the worth of the chattels of the dif- ferent landowners on their various estates to give three instances : (i) Bishop of Worcester : Place. Sum paid. Ripple . ... 4Os. Alvechurch . . 2 marks Hartlebury . . 33^. ^d. Hanbury . . . 36^. Throckmorton . . 12s. Fladbury .... 56^. Wich Episcopi . . 3cw. (2) Abbott of Pershore : Mathon . . . los. Leigh . . . . 5OJ. Aldremoneston . . 40^. (3) Abbot of Evesham : Hampton . . 4 marks Offenham . . . Bos. Littleton ... 2 marks Aldington . . 6*^ marks Hamberleye . . . ?os. Lench 22s. Place. Bredon Tredington Blockley . Northwick Kempsey . Eston Walecote Broadway Morton . Homburne Lenchwick Wickhamford Evesham . Sum paid 72S. 4OS. . I2OJ. . JIS. 30-f. 22J. 5 marks 2OS. 4 marks 4 marks I Of. J4 marks 10 marks INTRODUCTION. Vll These lists do not pretend to be exhaustive ; but they give some idea of the respective values of the personal chattels of the Bishop of Worcester and the Abbots of "two of the religious Houses. It would be a very important item of county history to give in the same way the names of all the landowners, both ecclesiastical and lay, who were taxed in more than one vill ; it would shew to a great extent the landowners of the county at the beginning of the fourteenth century, and the value of their different estates. 6. On looking over the list of names it is striking to see the large number of females, either widows or women, holding in their own right, e.g. Cradley, domina de Cradeley ; Hagley, domina de Hagley ; Frankley, relicta Augeri de Tatlinton ; Elmly Lovet, Isolda relicta Elye de Akton ; Morton, Christina domina ; and amongst the list of those who paid are constantly such entries as Rosina atte Stocks, 2s. 4^., Christina la Rotes, 18^., Hawisia la Hopere, \2d. t Roesia filia Margeria, 17 d. ; the list might be extended to almost any length ; the number of women possessed of property seems to point to the fact that something like law, order and respect for pro- perty prevailed in the county. 7. Some information is furnished by the Roll as to who the in- habitants of the county were. From the habit of speaking of persons by the name of the place from which they came, a clue is given to the number of strangers : thus we get in the case of Worcester (i) a number of person from different places in the county called by the name of the place : Henry of Grimley, Thomas of Croule, Simon of Snodesbury, William of Astley ; (2) a number of persons (English) from places outside the county : Alic of Bristol, Thomas of Brom- yard, Robert of Hereford, William of London, Richard of Winchester, William of Westmoreland ; (3) aliens such as John the Frenchman (le Franceys), Thomas the Welshman (le Waleis) ; (4) persons called from their trades or occupation, Philip the Hunter, John the Dyer, William the Tailor, Richard the Lorimer, Robert the Smith ; (5) per- sons called from some peculiarity or nickname, Richard Losewit, Robert Bastard, Simon Chyterling, John the Waryknave, William the little (le petit), William the person (la persone); (6) persons called after their parents, John, son of Osbert, Agnes, daughter of Ada le Berchere, Peter son of Alexander. By a careful classification of the different names a list might be made out of the strangers Vlll INTRODUCTION. living in the county, the foreigners settled there, and the trades carried on ; and if in any place an exceptional number of any class was found, it is probable some historical reason could be given to explain this exception. 8. The Roll also shews how surnames came to be formed. It was necessary to have something to distinguish the different Johns and Williams, and the distinction was mostly.drawn from the place of origin, the trade carried on, some personal peculiarity, the place where the person lived, or relationship to some other person. Thus there is Hugh of the Mill, Hugh de Molendino ; Richard the Newman (Ri- cardus novus homo) \\ Benedict, son of Alice, " filius Aliciae ;" Richard of the Claypit (de Kleyputtee) ; John at the Townsend (Attetownes- ende), William Atwater (atte watere), William of the Pit or Well (de la Putte), &c. Any one looking through the Roll will see the origin of a number of modern English surnames ; the very long ones are generally the result of running together some local direction to find the man, as William Binethetheweye, who is simply William Beneath the way. There are a large number of names that it is difficult to make out, but the Roll is a storehouse of the origin of English surnames. 9. There are a number of other points of interest that will occur to any one who studies the Roll carefully, such as the difference in the size of the vills. Where the chief man was an ecclesiastic, the vills are with some exceptions more important in the sense of there being more people than in the case of those in lay hands. The majority of the small vills are held by laymen. It should be mentioned that in the Record Office there are a series of Subsidy Rolls relating to Worcestershire. The earliest is some thirty years later than this, 1327, i Edward III., and a comparison of the early Rolls with each other would doubtless bring out many very interesting matters in relation to the county and the social life of the people. IO. It remains to state how the date of this Roll has been arrived at. As the heading is missing, and there is no memorandum at the foot saying when the taxation was completed and the Roll handed in, the date can only be ascertained by internal evidence. It is almost certainly between 1268 and 1296, and probably between 1276 and 1282. This is arrived at from the following eritries in the Roll : INTRODUCTION. ix (a) Under Hanley 1 , the name of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester, occurs ; this must be Gilbert de Clare (the Red Earl) who was Earl of Gloucester from 1262 to 1295. His predecessor was Richard, who died in 1262. The Red Earl's son, the last Earl, was also Gilbert, and died in 1314, but he was not called Earl of Glou- cester during the life of his mother, Joan, the daughter of Edward I., and she did not die till 1307, so that there was no Gilbert de Clare Earl of Gloucester between 1295 and 1307. The Gilbert de Clare mentioned here must have lived between 1268 and 1298, for under Beleye on the Roll z , William Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, is men- tioned ; it therefore follows that the Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Glou- cester, must have been a contemporary of William Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick. William de Beauchamp succeeded his father in 1268, and became Earl of Warwick in right of his mother, Isabel, and died in 1298. His son, who died in 1314, was Guy, so that it follows that as Gilbert de Clare was contemporary with William, Earl of Warwick, he must be' the Red Earl who died in 1295. As William de Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, did not succeed to the title till- 1268, the Roll must be in the 27 years between 1268 and 1295. But the 27 years is further limited by the fact that under the head of Frankley is found "de relicta Augeri de Tatlinton." Among the Hagley Charters is one, No. 37, a confirmation by Emma domina de Frankeleye, widow, to the Abbot and Convent of Halesowen for the soul of her late husband, Auger de Tatlinton, of an annual rent of 2s. from land in Frankley 3 ; this is dated 6 Nov., 1276, and it is most probable she then had not been long a widow, as grants by widows for their husbands' souls were usually within a short time of their husbands' death, and rich widows were not allowed to remain long unmarried. It is therefore probable that the Roll is not earlier than 1276, and this limits it to the 19 years, 1276 to 1295. () Under Clifton 4 , Roger Mortimer is mentioned. This was probably Roger Mortimer of Wigmore, Sheriff of Herefordshire, who died 1282 ; if so the date of the Roll would be in the six years between 1276 and 1282. 1 p. 112. * p. 100. 3 p. 18, 4 p. 64. INTRODUCTION. The following Index of the different places mentioned in the Roll, with their modern names, has been compiled, and may prove useful in identifying the different localities : Acton (Acton Beauchamp), 54 Abunton, 41 Akberewe, 94 Aklerewe (Agberrow), 13 Albedeley (Abberley), 56 Aldremoneston (Alderminster), 103 Aldington (Aldington), 82 Almeleye Lovet (Elmley Lo- vett), 1 8 Alsoston (Alston, Overbury), 70 Alvechirche (Alvechurch), 29 Alvynton (Alton, Rock), 57 Baldehale (Barnard's Green, Mal- vern), 93 Bathenhale (Battenhall), 40 Beley (Beoley), 100 Belinton (Bellington, Chaddes- ley), 15 Belne Bruyn (Bell End, Bel- broughton), n Belne Simonis (Moor Hall Bell, Belbroughton), n Benetleye (Bentley Pauncefoot), 21 Beningeworthe (Bengeworth), 87 Berewe (Berrow), 44 Beriton (Berington, Tenbury), 52 Berlingscote (Darlingscot, Tred- ington), 73 Beseford (Besford), 107 Beyton (Bayton), 56 Bishampton (Bishampton), 35 Blakewell (Blackwell, Shipston), 74 Blanesford (Bransford), 96 Blockeleye (Blockley), 75 Boclinton (Bockleton), 52 Bocton (Boughton, Ripple), 27 Bradeleye (Bradley, Fladbury), 38 Bradewas (Broadwas), 48 Bradeweye (Broadway), 108 Bredone (Bredon), 68 Bremesgrave (Bromsgrove), 64 Bretforton (Bretforton), 83 Brochamcote (Brockencote,Chad- desley), 15 Brocton (Belbroughton), 7 Brocton Haket (Broughton Rack- et), 1 02 Broctone (Drake's Broughton), 105 Bromhale (Broomhale, Norton), 80 Brysthampton (Bricklehampton), 101 Byrlyngham (Birlingham), in Bysford (Ditchford, Blockley), 75 Bysseley (Bushley), 114 Caldewelle (Caldwell nr. Per- shore), 104 Caldicote (Goldicote, Shipston), 104 Carkedon (Carton, Mamble), 58 Chaddesleye (Chaddesley Cor- bett), 14 Chaddesleye (Chaseley), 91 Cherchull (Churchill near Wor- cester), 40 Childrehaule (Child's Hanley, Eastham), 53 INTRODUCTION. XI Chyrchull (Churchill, Kidder- minster), 14 Clethale(Overhall,Dodderhill) J 22 Clifton (Clifton-on-Teme), 57 Clifton (Clifton-on-Teme), 64 Clyva (Cleeve Prior), 72 Clyvelode (Clevelode), 94 Codeley (Cudley, Spetchley), 40 Cofton (Cofton Racket), 19 Cokesey (Cooksey, Dodderhill), 18 Cotestone (Cutsdean), 75 Cradeleye (Cradley, Oldswin- ford), 10 Crombe Dabetoth (Croome D'Abetot), 26 Crombe Simon (Earl's Croome), 26 Croppethorn (Cropthorn), 71 Crowele (Crowle), 22 Crowenest (Crowneast, Worces- ter), 50 Cruch (Crutch, Droitwich), 22 Cumbrintone (Comberton, Kid- derminster), 13 Cure Wyard (Kyre Wyard), 54 Daylesford (Daylesford), 77 Donhamside (Dunhamstead, Od- dingley), 38 Dome (Dome, Blockley), 77 Dormeston (Dormstone), no Draycote (Draycote, Blockley), 77 Draycote (Draycote, Kempsey), 79 Dray ton (Dray ton, Chaddesley), 15 Duddeleye (Dudley), 8 Dudeham (Doddenham), 59 Dunclent (Dunclent, Stone), 12 Eclinton (Oldington ?), 12 Edbriston (Wadborough ?), 105 Edmundescote (Armscote, Rip- ple), 74 Ekynton (Eckington), ic8 Eldresfeld (Eldresfield), 113 Elmbrugge (Elmbridge), 24 Elmeleye (Elmley Castle), 73 Estham (Eastham), 53 Estle (Astley), 58 Estone (Aston, Blockley), 76 Eston (White Ladies (?) Aston), 8 1 Evesham, 89 Fladebur (Fladbury), 36 Flavell (Flyford Flavell), 106 Fekeham (Feckenham), 20 Fepsinton (Phepson, Himbleton), 38 Forfeld(Fairfield,Belbroughton),6 Frankeleye (Frankley), 18 Grafton (Grafton Manor, Broms- grove), 1 8 Graftone (Grafton Flyford), 109 Grokkeberew (Cruckbarrow, Wor- cester), 40 Groule (Crowle), 39 Gyldintre (Yieldingtree, Chad- desley), 15 Habbelench (Hoblench), 35 Haddesovere (Hadsor), 22 Haggeleye (Hagley), 10 Hallauwe (Hallow), 49 Hamberleye (Ombresley), 83 Hambury (Hanbury), 33 Hampine, 64 Hampton (Hampton Lovett), 22 Hamton (Hampton by Evesham), 81 Xll INTRODUCTION. Hanlee Wyllame (Hanley Wil- liam), 63 Hanley (Hanley Castle), 112 Harleye (Horewell?, Pershore), 26 Hathfield (Hatfield,Kempsey), 80 Henneslode (Evenlode), 77 Herewinton (Harvington, Chad- desley), 15 Hertlebury (Hartlebury), 31 Herverton (Harvington), 72 Hetheye (Heathy Mill, Kidder- minster), 12 Hoclinton (Oakley, Salwarpe ?), 39 Hoffenham (Offenham), 81 Holefeld (Holdfast), 43 Holtre (Holt), 47 Holderugg, 59 Holmee (Home, Clifton), 56 Homburne (Honeyburne), 87 Hosintre et Merton (Martin Hus- ingtree), 102 Hugingehale (Uckingshall), 27 Hulle (Hill Pool, Chaddesley), 15 Hulleberewe (Holsborough nr. Morton Underbill ?), 88 Humelton (Himbleton), 38 Hyndelepe (Hindlip), 41 Inkbarewe (Inkberrow), 34 Imenye (Impney, Dodderhill), 24 Jerdeleye (Yardley), 100 Keningeford (Kingsford, Kidder- minster), 13 Kemesey (Kempsey), 79 Kersewelle (Kerswell, Kempsey), 79 Kintewyke (Kent's Green, or Kenswick ?), 45 Kydermunstre (Kidderminster), 9 Kyngton (Kington), 19 Langedon (Longdon), 93 Ledeleye (Lutley, Halesowen ?), 14 Lench Randolf (Rouse Lench), 35 Lench Roculf (Rouse Lench), 19 Lench Sacriste (Abbot's Lench), 86 Lenchwyk (Lenchwick), 88 Leya (Leigh), 97 Lindene (Lindon, Rock), 60 Linderug (Lindridge), 48 Lippard (Lippard, Spetchley), 39 Little Inteborge (Little Ink- berrow), 37 Longedon (Longdon Treding- ton), 73 Lutlinton (Littleton), 82 Madresfeld (Madresfield), 94 Major Cumberton (Great Com- berton), 107 Mathine (Mathon), 97 Mertelee (Martley), 61 Midleste Bysford (Ditchford, Blockley), 75 Minor Cumberton (Little Com- berton), 106 Mokenhulle (Muckenhill, Stoul- ton), 25 Mora (Moore, Rock), 58 More juxta Abunton, 41 Morton, 20 Morton (Abbot's Morton), 86 Morton Bree (Birtsmorton), 92 Morton Folet (Castlemorton), 97 Mutton (Mitton, Bredon), 70 Muttone (Upper Mitton), De Henrico de Tapenhale ijs. De Willielmo Basset . iiijj. De Roberto le Oter . . v]d. De Simone Francisco . vs. De Ricardo Losewit . x\d, Summa iiij/z. vjs. viijd. WARDA SANCTI MARTINI. De Thoma le Cotiller . x\]d. De Roberto Fabro . . js. De Johanne filio Osberti x marc De Willielmo Rotario di 1 marca De Reginaldo le Mire . iijs. De Waltero le Tywlare . . v]d. De Galfrido Edwyne . . vij for " Th." LAY SUBSIDY ROLL. If BOCTON'. De Willielmo de Monte Caniso . . . vs. v]d. De Amicia uxore Johannis de Hull' . . j marca De Sampsone de Hulle . vjs. De Philippe de Hulle . xvjV. De Willielmo Skil . iiijj. v]d. De Roberto de la More . ijs. De Willielmo Sampson iijj. v]d. De Leticia la Carpentere ijs. v]d. De Johanne le Paumer . ijs. De Ricardo Randulf . ijs. De Ricardo Goldyve iijs. v]d, De Hugone Mazelin . ijs. De Johanne Mazelin . ijs. De Thoma Coterell' ijj. v]d. De Johanne Fremon iiijs. v\V]d. De Johanne Sampson . xx^. De Alexandro Bernard ijs. v]d. De Nicholao Bosse . . Summa \xijs. v]d. . ijs. iijs. v]d. H RYPPEL. De Episcopo Wygorn' De Nicholao de Mutton' . De Isabella de Ruhale De Radulpho de la Lode De Johanne Alayn . De Ricardo Ph' De Benedicto de Huginge- hale De Willielmo Juvene De Henrico Porcario xb. dim' marca iiijs. dim' marca Ijs. x.v]d. '. v\\]d. iijs. xv ]d. II SUTHLYE. De Orm de Suthleye iiijs. v]d. De Nicholao Prat . De Thoma Wytard . De Nicholao Tryg . De Nicholao Gnayobon . ijs. Summa iiij/z. v\\]d. H HUGINGEHALE. De Alicia la Euche . vs. v]d. De Alicia la Carpentere iijs. v]d. De Juliana la Hurt . ijj. v]d. De Matilda Gileberd De Susanna Gerveys' De Willielmo Textore . ijs. De Claricia Hatherich iijs. v]d. De Agnete la Carpentere vs. v]d. De Nicholao Adelard . ijs. De Willielmo Hatherych . xle lee De Roberto Kempe . De Johanne filio Felicie . i\\]s. De Willielmo Sampson iijj. vjd. De Aluredo ultra Aquam iijj. vjd. De Willielmo Ruddus . xs. De Johanne in )>e more ijs. iiijd. De Simone le Bruyn . xxd. De Roberto Edwy . vs. vjd. De Juliana Brun . . ixs. De Juliana la Palmere iiijj. vjd. De Gervasio atte Wode ijs. iiijd. De Willielmo atte Wode . xijd. De Johanne le Leominur ijs. iiijd. De Thoma Coco . . ijs. De Willielmo deWasthulle dim' marca De Hugone le Macun . ijs. De Juliana atte 3rochole . x\d. De Ranulpho filio Petri . ijs. De Johanne Geraud . xijd. De Johanne de Radeford . xijd. De Adam Lemoch' . De Johanne Lupo majore xxd. De Roberto Haldem x\X]V. De Willielmo Baril . . xviijV. De Agnete de Rowenheye vjs. De Thoma atte Berewe . xijd. De Johanne de NorP . vs. De Editha Edwy . ijs. vjd. De Rogero Kempe . ijs. iiijd. De Martino Kempe . iijs. vjd. De Johanne de la Cnolle . xijd. De Willielmo de la Cnolle xvjd. De Willielmo Ingrith dim' marca De Willielmo Eylmund . vijs. De Hugone de Norf . iiijj. De Nicholao de la Hethe . ij s. De Willielmo Fabro iiijj. vjd. De Waltero de la Grene iiijs. vjd. De Thoma de Alecote . xvjV. De Willielmo de Eysber' dim' marca De Ricardo Molendinario iiijj. vjd. Summa xv/z. xijs. f WARMEDONE. De Willielmo de Bray . xxs. De Ricardo Randulf . ijj. De Bartholomeo de War- medon* .... xxd. De Ricardo le Newemon . xs. De Simone de Warmedon' ijj. vjd. De Galfrido de eadem ijs. vjd. De Ricardo le Newemon . ijs. De Johanne Houdi . ijs. vjd. De Hugone filio Stephani xviijd. De Johanne de la Putte iijs. viijd. De Roberto le Waleys iijs. vjd. De Waltero le Eorl . iijs. viijd. De Johanne de Molmon . xijd. De Johanne de Dingle iijs. vjd. LAY SUBSIDY ROLL. Henr' De Kenewreyk Walensis ijj. v]d. De Johanne. Geraud . . ijs. De Johanne Brun . . iijs. De Ricardo filio Ranulphi ijs. vjd. De Gumberto de War- medon' . . . ijs. vjd. De Matilda Aluret . . xxd. De Willielmo Brun . . xxd. De Waltero de Malvernia xijd. Summa Ixxvj-r. v\\]d. " t HERTLEBURY. De Episcopo Wygorn' xxxiijj. iiijW. DeWillielmode Wyklinge vjs. De Ricardo de Hertlebur' xxd. De Henrico Thorny . . iijj. De Roberto de eadem . iij^. De Henrico Lylie . . xijd. De Reginaldo Sutore . xxd. De Henrico de Spina . iijs. De Editha vidua . . iijj. De Thoma Pye . ijs. vjd. De Waltero de Tydinton' ijs. vjd. De Avicia de Esrugge . iijs. De Thoma Roge . . iiijj. De Johanne de Essrugg' . xxd. De Thoma de Gatebrugg' iiijs. De Simone Venatore . iiijs. De Sarra de Waresleye . xxd. De relicta J. Alisandre . xijd. De Johanne le Fiz . ijs. v]d. De Galfrido Ervi . . ijs. De Willielmo Smale . ijs. De relicta Robert! Carpen- tarii .... iijs. De Roberto Parre . iijs. v]d. De Juliana le Bole . . xvjd. De Waltero Hend . . iijs. De Alicia Parre . . xijV. De Gilberto Wares!' . . ijs. De Thoma filio Henrici . xvjd. De Roberto Vicinario ejus tfs. vjd. De Ricardo de eadem iiijs. vjd. De Galfrido de Pepewall' . iijs. De Johanne de Pepewall' ij s. viijd. De Galfrido Bolepekk . xijd. De Roberto le Bakare . xijd. De Thoma le Gardino 'ijs. vjd. De Willielmo Forestario . xijd. De Ricardo de Lincomb' . ij.f. DeJ.de Leche . . iiijj. De Willielmo Duy . ijs. vjd. De Henrico de eadem ijs. viijd. De Louec' vidua . . xvjd. De Willielmo de Newe- cumbe .... xijd. De Simone de Lincombe ijs. vjd. De Roberto Mont' . ijs. vjd. De Thoma filio Willielmi xviijd. De Willielmo Baltwin . vjs. De Thoma de eadem . ijs. De Thoma filio Gilbert! . xviijW. De Henrico de Cydinton' ijs. iiijd. De Thoma de Poughamton' iijs. De Ricardo de eadem . xxaf. De Willielmo de eadem ijs. vjd. De Ricardo percher Ju- niore . . . iijs. vjd. De Ricardo Vicinario ejus xijd. De Willielmo de Stur' ijs. vjd. De Willielmo de Wybel- don' juniore . . . iijs. De Willielmo seniore . ijs. De Willielmo Chesul . xxd. De Rogero Mont . . xvjd. LAY SUBSIDY ROLL. De Editha vidua . . xviij^. De Willielmo Russel . ijs. De Elena vidua . . xijd De Waltero Hajjewy ijs. v]d. De Henrico de Putte ijs. vjd. De Waltero le Fremon . xijV. De Johanne Molendinario \\]s. De Gilberto de Hertlebur' ijs. \}d. De Johanne de Cruce Ijs. vjd. De Waltero de Gines . xvjW. De Editha in the hale . xijd. De Willielmo de Hutinton' xijd. De Johanne de la Brok' . xviij De Willielmo filio Galfridi xijV. De Willielmo filio Radulphi ijs. Summa Ixxiijj. IT HOCLINTON'. De Domina Cecilia de So- lar' De Domina Beatrice de Podinton' . . . De Johanne de Fonte . De Henrico Gledewyn' vs. De Johanne le Whyte . De Gilberto de la Hale iijj. De Gilberto de Pennu- summa . . " . . De Ricardo [filio] Willielmi De Ricardo le Messer . De Ricardo de Tapenhal' iijj De Roberto de la Cause iijV. De Waltero Brun . . XS. viijj. iijs. \\\]d. iijj. . v]d. ijs. iijs. v]d. iijs. IT ODDINGELEYE. De Rogero de Mortuomari ij marce De Roberto de Grafton' . vs. De Adam de Dodingleye ijs. iiijV. De Cristina filia Rogeri . ijs. De Ricardo filio Waited . ijs. De Isabella de porta . xijV. Johanne le Bercher . . xv]d. De Mabilla de Doddingley ijj. Summa iiij/z. xjs. \]d. IT TYBRYTON'. De Priore Wygorn' . ij marce De Thoma Diveling' . xxs. De Thoma Galon . . xijd. De Henrico Forestario . xxd. De Adam de Mora . . iijs. De Matilda Wistil'. . iijs. \]d. De Thoma filio Thome iijs. v]d. De Thoma le chapelein . ijs. De Adam le Waleys ijs. \\ijd. De Ricardo Clowe . . ijs. De Willielmo Parvo . . xi]d. De Alicia Duck' . iiijs. v]d. De Willielmo Knict De Editha Brict De Reginaldo Seben' vjs. v]d. De Roberto de Graveley' ijs. \\\}d. De Johanne Duck' . . ijs. De Willielmo de Bosco ijs. \\{]d. De Ricardo de Grofley . v'njs. Summa iiij/z'. xvs. LIPPARD. De Priore Wygorn' ibidem xxxs. Summa xxxj. f BRADECOTE. De Johanne de Brodecot' xv]d. De Roberto Schine . ijs. v]d. De Matilda la Hopere . xvn]d. De Elisio Schin' . iiijj. m]d. De Johanne le Roer . iijs. De Henrico de Brocton' . iijs. De Willielmo de Bradecote vs. f GROULE. De Domino Ricardo Sy- ward ibidem . ij marce De Nicholao Crudel' . x.v]d. De Ricardo de Ode De Willielmo le Colier 40 LAY SUBSIDY ROLL. De Thoma capellano . vs. De Ricardo preposito . iijj. De Matheo de Croule iij. vjd. De Nicholao Welaunt . xvjW. De Alicia Welaunt . . xijd. De Alano le Careter . xijdl De Juliana la Copper . xijd. De Willielmo le taylor . x'\jd. De Willielmo le Brut . xijV. De Hugone de Stok' ijs. vjd. Summa Ixxj. iiijd. IT CHERCHHULL'. De Johanne de London j marca De Matilda de Chirchull' dim' marca De Roberto le Fremon iijj. vjd. De Juliana vidua . iijj. vjd. De Roberto Tenor' . . xijd. De Alexandro preposito . vjs. De Thoma capellano . xviijd. De Waltero de la Holte . xv'rijd. De Stephano Fabro . ijs. v]d. De Ricardo Dou . . xxijd. De Ricardo de Oke . . xxd. De Alicia Martin . . xijd. Summa xliiijj. f SPECHESLEYE. De Johanne de Everley ij marce De Ricardo de Boys . xs. De Johanne Maynard . vjs. De Ricardo Stepen' . iiijj. vjd. De Johanne le Hopere ijs. vjd. De Ricardo Emeri . ijj. vjd. De Johanne Molendinario xijd. De Thoma le Fraunceys . De Ricardo Frer' . . De Roberto Bret . . iijj. De Alicia de Ledebur' ijj. v]d. De Thoma Capellano . xxijaT. De Johanne de Chadesley ijs. De Johanne Fabro . . xvjW. Summa Ixxs. iii vs. H CODELEYE. De Thoma de Codeleye . viijs. De Philippe de eadem ijs. iiijd. De Nicholao de eadem ijs. v]d. De Willielmo de eadem ijj. v]d. Item xij