BIOLOGY LIBRARY Lectures on Biology DE. CUET THESING TKANSLATED FROM THE SECOND EDITION BY W. E. BOELTEE WITH THE ORIGINAL COLOURED AND OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS Xonfcon JOHN BALE, SONS & DANIELSSON, LTD. OXFORD HOUSE 83-91, GKEAT TITCHFIELD STKEET, OXFORD STREET, W. 1911 BIOLOGY R G PREFACE. THIS book consists of Lectures which were given by me during the winter terms of 1905 to 1907 at the Humboldt Academy and the Urania in Berlin. My object in delivering them was to show that it is no longer possible, having regard to the advances of modern research, to find complete satisfaction in being an out-and-out believer in the Darwinian or Lamarckian or any other theory. Each of these doctrines has rendered important service in promoting our knowledge, but the marks of their limitations have of recent years become increasingly distinct. The factors which the different doctrines assume to be at work in the genesis and evolution of the organic world are, however, not exclusive, for the Theory of Selection, the Doctrine of Adaptation and of Use and Non-use, and finally de Vries' Theory of Mutations, offer each for a certain section of organic evolution a sufficient and satisfactory explanation. That, on the other hand, a vast field of vital processes remains still hidden and unexplained only dogmatic prejudice will venture to deny. If I have succeeded in conveying to a wider circle this conception of conflicting theories, and if I have further succeeded in showing that "incomprehensible" does not mean " impossible to comprehend," my object in publishing these Lectures in book form has been attained. CURT THESING. 466582 ERRATA. Page 6, line 21 from top, for " animals " read " mammals." 9 ,, 20 ,, ,, ,, "but rather" read "as." „ 58 „ 9 ,, „ „ " (Triebewegung) " read "(Triebbewegung)." ,, 136, lines 7 and 10 for " ues centrale " read "os centrale" ,, 138, line 14 from top, for " princates " read "primates." ,, 169 „ 9 „ „ „ "trees "read "tree," and line 20 for "if "read ,, 178 ,, 1, read "use and natural selection." ,, 181 ,, 5 from top, insert after " Aid " " — a factor/' ,, 293, lines 14 and 15 from bottom are transposed. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGE FROM THALES TO LAMARCK 1 CHAPTER II. PHENOMENA AND CONDITIONS OF LIFE .".. ... 27 CHAPTER III. THE FORCES IN THE ORGANISM 50 CHAPTER IV. THE BUILDING-STONES OF THE ORGANIC WORLD 60 CHAPTER V. THE ORIGIN OF LIFE 85 CHAPTER VI. THE EVOLUTION THEORY .. 103 CHAPTER VII. THE FACTORS OF EVOLUTION 140 CHAPTER VIII. THE CONSERVATION OF LIFE ... 211 CHAPTER IX. HP-PRODUCTION AND HEREDITY . ... „. ,.. 25 J LIST OF ILLUSTKATIONS. FIG. 1. — The Lancelot (Branchiostoma lanceolatum) ... ... ... 13 FIG. 2. — Haddock ( Gadus cBglefinus] ; and Tub-fishes (Trigla hirundo)... 15 FIG. 3.— The African Mud-jumper (Periophthalmus hoelreuteri) 18 FIG. 4.— Evolution of the Extremities face 20 FIG. 5. — Skeletons of the Anterior Extremities of various Vertebrates ... 21 FIG. 6. — Flying-foxes (Pteropus edulis) 25 FIG. 7. — Skeleton of the Anterior Extremities of the Bat and the Flying Saurian Pterodactylus ... , ... ... ... ... ... 26 FIG. 8. — Amoeba Umax at different Temperatures 32 FIG. 9. — Neoscopelus macro lepidotus... ... ... ... ... ... 35 FIG. 10. — Bear-animalcules (Macrobiotus Imfelandi) ... ... ... 38 FIG. 11. — The Mud-fish (Protopterus annectens) 39 FIG. 12.— Fowl in a State of Cataplexy 44 FIG. 13.— Crayfish in a State of Cataplexy 45 FIG. 14. — Longitudinal Section of a Thighbone ... ... ... ... 52 FIG. 15.— Struggle of the Germ-cells in the Male Glands of a Cuttle-fish (Rossia macrosoma) ... ... ... ... ... ... 55 FIG. 16. — Anthozoa ... ... ... face 61 FIG. 17. — Fresh-water Polyp (H ydra viridis) 63 FIG. 18. — Symbiosis of Sea-anemone and Unicellular Algae ... ... 64 FIG. 19. — Venus's Fly-trap (Dionceamuscipula] ... .;.,'... ... 66 FIG. 20.— Structure of a Cell 71 FIG. 21. — Leucocytes of the Frog devouring a Bacillus 73 FIG. 22.— Cells-forms 78 FIG. 23.— Mitosis face 80 FIG. 24. — Bathybius HaecUi .... 98 FIG. 25.— Trilobites 105 FIG. 26.— Shells of Extinct Cephalopoda 107 FIG. 27. — Archaeopteryx face 110 FIG. 28. — Peripatus capensis Ill FIG. 29. —Development of the Foot of the Horse 113 FIG. 30.— Tooth-development of the Horse 114 FIG. 31.— Ova of Different Animals 116 FIG. 32.— Embryos of Vertebrates 118 FIG. 33. — Amblystoma tigrinum ... ... ... ... ... ... 121 FIG. 34. — Shifting of the Eyes during the Development of a Young Flat-fish 123 FIG. 35. — The Common Eorqual (Balcenoptera musculus) 124 FIG. 36. — Rudimentary Organs face 126 FIG. 37. — Echinodermata ,, 128 FIG. 38.— Water- vascular System of a Starfish ... 129 FIG. 39. — Larv* of Echinodermata 130 Vlll. LIST OF ILLUSTKATIONS PAGK FIG. 40. — Fornaria-larva of a Marine- worm (Balanof/lossus) 131 FIG. 41. — Larval Form a Crinoid 131 FIG. 42. — Trochophora Larva of Polygordius, a Marine Annelid ... ... 132 FIG. 43. — Nauplius Stage of Penceus potimirum 133 FIG. 44, —Zosea Stage of Crab ... ' 135 FIG. 45. — Life-history of the Liver-fluke (Fasciola [Distomum} liepatica) 154 FIG. 46. — Marine Jelly-fish face 162 FIG. 47. — Colour-adaptation and Mimicry „ 168 FIG. 48.— The Taguan (Pteromys petaurista) 178 FIG. 49. — Sexual Dimorphism face 178 FIG. 50. — Influence of Temperature during the Pupa Stage upon Colour and Design of Butterfly 187 FIG. 51. — Amoeba proteus in various Stages of Motion ... ... ... 213 FIG. 52. — Nummulites ... 219 FIG. 53. — A Micro-aquarium 220 FIG. 54. — Trumpet-animalcule (Stentor coeruleus) ... ... ... ... 223 FIG. 55. — Stentor cceruleus 224 FIG. 56. — Conjugation of Par amsecium in Six Stages 227 FIG. 57. — Life- cycle of the Malaria Parasite of Man ... ... ... 235 FIG. 58. — The Malaria Mosquito (Anopheles claviger) 239 FIG. 59. — Volvox globator 246 FIG. 60. — Green Fresh-water Polyp (Hydra viridis) 256 FIG. 61. — Salpa democratica ... ... ... ... ... ... face 259 FIG. 62. — Development of Aurelia aurita 260 FIG. 63. — Caterpillar covered with Cocoons of Microgaster glomeratus... 272 FIG. 64. — Ammophila liirsuta paralysing a Caterpillar ... ... ... 272 FIG. 65.— (1) Bhyncliites populi, with Leaf-roll. (2) Leaf-rolls of Khynchites betulte... ... ... ... ... ... ... 273 FIG. 66.— Mud-fly (Eristalis tenax] 275 FIG. 67. — G-eophagiis brachyurus 277 FIG. 68. — Hippocampus antiquorum ... ... ... ... ... ... 278 FIG. 69. — Brazilian Frog (Pipa americana), with young 280 FIG. 70. — Spermatozoa of Different Animals face 283 FIG. 71. — Change of a Spermatid in a Scuttle-fish (Octopus Defilippi] into a Spermatozoon 292 'FiG. 72. — Diagram of a Maturation Division 294 FIG. 73.— Fertilization face 296 FIG. 74.— Mendel's Law 318 COLOUEED PLATES. PLATE I. — Animal Life in the Antarctic ... ... ... to face page 32 PLATE II. — Deep-sea Life „ „ 42 PLATE III. — Reptiles of the Triassic and Jurassic Periods ,, ,, 108 PLATE IV.— Flat-fish „ „ 122 PLATE V. — Domesticated Pigeons „ „ 142 PLATE VI.— Symbiosis „ „ 182 LECTURES ON BIOLOGY. CHAPTER I. FKOM THALES TO LAMAECK. Two characteristics are ineradicably fixed in the human mind : the desire for action, and the thirst for knowledge. We see their origin in the infant when in the first awakening of consciousness it longingly puts forth its tiny hands. The play of the child is but the consciousness of its desire to be busy. Play to the child means living. In play it forgets itself and its bodily wants : a day of enforced idleness will harm it more than a day without food. When, later, the growing child breaks up its playthings, we observe in that action the awakening of the desire for know- ledge. It is no longer content with the bare fact that its doll squeaks when it is squeezed ; it wants to know how the doll looks inside, why it squeaks. Destructiveness and inquisitive- ness are to the child as yet identical. In the act of destruction reveals itself the desire to analyse, to dissect a phenomenon into its elements, to fathom the cause of things. As in the early life of the individual, so we perceive in the history of the nations and of mankind the need to trace each phenomenon to a cause — in other words, we observe the con- scious pursuit of knowledge. It is true that, as with the child, so with primitive man, the impulse is as yet not clearly perceived ; but it exists, nevertheless, no matter how far we may go back in the history of primitive man. Like the child 1 2 LECTURES ON BIOLOGY questioning persistently because it wants to know, so savage man asks after the Why of all things. Why does the sun rise morning after morning ? Why does the sun set in the evening behind the mountains in the distant horizon ? Why is there sickness, why death ? Why is one year healthy and fruitful, why does the next bring famine and epidemics ? But the greatest question of all that have agitated the mind of man is that of his own place in Nature, of his origin, and of the future of his soul after death. Unable to find a satisfying answer to his yearning, he created gods in his own image, regarding them as the cause of all that is, to whom the world and he owed their existence, and into whose presence his soul could fly when death had claimed him. As man is, so is his god ; the degree of man's knowledge determines the perfection of his deity. The gods of the savage and barbarous tribes, even those of the Greeks and Romans, are endowed with every human passion and weakness, and it is not until the Jewish-Christian period that we find a god who rises to the purity of a perfect being. All that man has perceived to be high and noble : mercifulness, love, righteousness, wisdom, truth, and goodness, he attributes to his deity. ' First, man uncon- sciously creates god in his image/ says Feuerbach in a brilliant paraphrase, 'then this god consciously creates man in his image.' In this dark yearning after knowledge and truth, in this eternal desire of the human mind to find an answer to the innumerable questions with which he is confronted on all sides, and a solution of the great riddle of his existence and life, we find the origin of all religion. But there we find also the beginning of science, for science, too, searches after a cause for each phenomenon, and after the final cause of all phenomena. Thus religion and science have the same aim though they approach it by different roads : to find the cause of all causes. Why is it, we may ask, that in spite of like objects and like aims there exists between them a growing abyss ? Why do science and religion oppose each other in bitter strife ? As both arise from the same desire, why do they not help each other? Why did the Church in the dark Middle Ages put to the stake or sword men who had found and proclaimed the truth? To-day, when manners are milder, the stake and sword FKOM THALES TO LAMARCK 3 are replaced by harsh and bitter words which the protagonists in both camps hurl at each other unsparingly. The cause of this deadly enmity lies deep down in the nature of both schools of thought. For whilst religion — -that is, religious dogma — represents the ' origin of all that is ' as something absolute, unalterable, and visits with severe punishment _any enquiry after that which lies beyond, science is ever conscious, or should be, that each hypothesis promulgated, each law formu- lated, are but steps in the pursuit of knowledge, the aim of which lies, an eternal task, in the infinite. ' There is no finality to our pursuit of the knowledge of life, and though we may now and then attempt to cast a balance, we know that even the best which we are able to give can but be a step to the better.' These words, which form the introduction to the Lectures on the Evolution Theory by the great zoologist of Freiburg, August Weismann, fittingly describe not only the value of biological research, but also of all science. It is not our object to deal with the various creation-theories contained in the mythology of the Indians, Assyrians, and other nations, nor need we refer to the biblical story of the creation of the world and man, for on the one hand it is familiar to all, and on the other of no value for the advancement of scientific knowledge. We may therefore at once direct our attention to the classic period of the Ionic Natural Philosophers. At the head of the Greek philosophy, and, indeed, as the first Greek philosopher, is usually mentioned Thales of Miletus who was counted one of the Seven Wise Men. In his teachings we find, for the first time, an attempt to establish a uniform principle of all phenomena, a universal theory of reality. Thales declares that water is the original principle from which all pro- ceeds ; his successors gradually establish the Infinite, the Fire, the Air, and the Atoms as fundamental principles. These are according to modern conceptions crude and primitive theories, but they are nevertheless the first attempts to comprehend the reality scientifically. There will be no time in this lecture to deal with every phase of this period of more than 2,000 years, nor shall we be able to deal, except in the briefest manner, with the most important epochs and the men to whom biology owes its 4 LECTUKES ON BIOLOGY greatest advancement. The object of this lecture is not to give a complete record but rather to present briefly the gradual rise of the natural sciences, the first dawn of the evolution theory ; afterwards, the rapid decay of science, and finally, its brilliant development during the eighteenth century. If one looks back upon the history of natural sciences in the Middle Ages and modern times, their rapid rise, in particular that of the descriptive branches, above all of zoology and botany, seems almost inconceivable. On one side we see the grossest superstition, or, at the best, defective and inaccurate knowledge ; on the other, an almost inexhaustible wealth of facts and accepted principles. One may indeed regard with pride the results of the untiring labour of the two preceding centuries. According to Ben Akiba there is nothing new under the sun. Looking backwards from the ignorance and suspicion of the Middle Ages, the loftiness of Greek civilization, evidenced by the high state of their knowledge of nature, seems equally incom- prehensible ; and it is still more difficult to understand that such great wealth of knowledge as was stored in the mind of an Aristotle should pass from the memory of man, almost without leaving a trace behind. Anaximander, a contemporary, disciple, and countryman of Thales, already taught the gradual natural evolution and change of the Universe and the organisms. He perceives the original principle in the 'Apeiron,' the Infinite. It has no origin and no end, changing only its forms. He conceived that from this unlimited original matter there proceeded by spontaneous division the warm and the cold. From these was formed the moist, and out of it, through drying, the earth, the air, and an all-surrounding fireball which finally burst and gave rise to the sun and the other heavenly bodies. The influence of the sunrays developed out of the primordial mud the first degree of organic life, certain vesicular formations which gradually developed into fish-like animals. In proportion as the drying process went on, some of the fishes left the moist element and under the influence of changed external conditions and a new mode of life changed into the various species of land animals. Finally the species man naturally evolved from animal, ancestors. ' But whence all beings have sprung thence they must return, as a penance for FROM THALES TO LAMARCK 5 the injustice of their existence, in the order of time.' Thus worlds follow worlds in a never-ending cycle. It is remarkable to encounter thus early a theory of the mechanical creation of the organic world, and a hypothesis of a natural evolution. A philosopher of the fifth century B.C., Empedocles of Acragas, equally famous by his teachings as by his death which he sought and found in the crater of j3£tna, does not only take his stand on the theory of descent but sounds also the first distinct note of the Darwinian Theory of the Survival of the Fittest. These doctrines are, indeed, as yet intermixed with many crude and phantastic conceptions, but their appearance is all the more surprising when one considers the very small store of information in natural history which was then available. According to Empedocles the origin of all things lies in the four elements of the ancients : water, fire, air and earth. In the beginning of time all four elements rested with one another, unseparated and unmixed, completely held together in the form of a self-contained sphere by the union of love, or as we should say to-day, by the force of attraction. But hatred found an entrance, and with it came separation which led to the founda- tion of the world and all organisms. Through this eternal strife between love and hatred, and the consequent perpetual mingling and separating of the four elements, there gradually arose on the earth organic life. First the plants sprouted from the lap of the maternal earth, then came the animals. But according to Empedocles only single organs developed in the beginning, legs without bodies, noses and eyes without faces, heads without trunks, and so forth. At first different organs became united by chance, thus originating chiefly awful monstrosities unfit to live and doomed to death as soon as they had begun to exist. But as like attracts like and repels unlike, here and there certain creatures originated whose organs fitted and complemented each other. Thus organisms were formed which were fit to live, and if the fitness had been complete capable of reproducing their kind and transmitting their own qualities to their descendants. However extravagant and wild these ideas may at the first glance appear, they contain a profound thought : the mechanical origin of the fittest in nature and the survival of the fittest forms. It is the same thought which 2,000 years after arose to LECTURES ON BIOLOGY new life with Darwin and, cleansed of all dross of mysticism, opened to research undreamt-of paths. The zenith of natural philosophy in classic time is reached with the age of Aristotle. Posterity has justly bestowed upon this great man the name of Father of Natural Sciences. In him we do not only find embodied the sum-total of the knowledge of his time, but there are also numerous branches of knowledge which he vastly enriched. It was he who first attempted a classification of the animal kingdom according to the degree of relationship. The boldness of this undertaking will be better understood when we call to mind the fact that Aristotle knew only some 500 different species, whilst we know to-day between 300,000 to 400,000. Yet so clearly saw this master-mind in spite of this difficulty that the Aristotelian division has in its main points been retained up to the present day. Aristotle was aided by a surprising store of detailed informa- tion, much of which was re-discovered during the last century by the great naturalist of Berlin, Johannes Miiller. Thus Aristotle knew, to mention only two instances, that many sharks are viviparous, and that whales and dolphins are not fishes but animals. That such a mind should ponder on the origin of the organic world and endeavour to find a natural explanation cannot therefore excite surprise. With the death of the great Stagirite natural sciences rapidly decay ; instead of scientific research we find the grossest super- stition. Even Pliny the Elder who perished during an erup- tion of Vesuvius A.D. 79 whilst commanding the Roman fleet at Misenum is at the best only a very untrustworthy compiler. If of anyone, it may be said of him that Viele Dinge wusste er freilich, Doch alle wusste er schlecht. Pliny piled up whatever he found, without troubling himself about the scientific value of his ' finds.' There is nothing of the Aristotelian mind in him, and his division of the natural world into ' land, water and air animals ' is no more scientific than if he had divided it, as Weismann tersely remarks, according to the alphabet. The decay of sciences proceeded apace, first under the Roman FROM THALES TO LAMARCK 7 emperors, still more during the Middle Ages. Even Galen, the founder of scientific physiology, who lived in the third century, was unable to arrest it. Nothing will better indicate the low ebb at which science had arrived than a few quotations from the so-called 'Physiologus,' which was during the Middle Ages the most celebrated and best known work on natural history. It was written about the third century and has been translated into almost every civilized language. It draws its facts of natural history mainly from the Bible and various Roman and Greek authors. Altogether forty-one animals are mentioned in this book, and of each we hear remarkable news. Thus it is said of the panther : ' He is multi-coloured, after a meal he sleeps three days, wakes up roaring and emits such pleasant odours that all animals go to him/ Of the lion we are told that ' after his birth he is dead three days, but on the third day his father comes, blows into his face and thus ^Wakens him into life.' Similar stories are told of the hyena, the pelican, the phoenix, ttie unicorn, the siren and other * species of the animal kingdom.' '^ Blind belief in dogma and all theories, encouraged by a fanatic priesthood, is the sign of that period. Only with the founder of astronomy, Nicolas Copernicus, with Galilei and his undying * E pur si muove ' flung from his dungeon out into the world, with Kepler's discovery of the course of the planets, and finally with Newton's demonstration of the Law of Gravita- tion, the blind belief in authorities breaks down, the tyranny of the Church collapses and we see the dawn of the new age of scientific research. , . • Prominent among the leaders in this new era is Cuvier, famous alike as the founder of comparative anatomy and as the bitterest and most powerful opponent of the Doctrine of Descent. His chief merit is that he, for the first time, examined the different species from the standpoint of comparative anatomy and thus built up a system which has remained the basis of modern classification. He formed the following four groups : — (1) Vertebrata. (2) Articulata. (3) Mollusca. (4) Radiata. 8 LECTUEES ON BIOLOGY According to Cuvier, each of these groups is entirely independent of all others, forms a distinct type, and is in no wise correlated with another type. Moreover, not only are these main groups entirely distinct, but each individual species again repre- sents a definite invariable unit. This constancy and immu- tability of the species is the corner-stone of Cuvier's theory. To this he clung with incredible tenacity up to the hour of his death, defending it in the face of all facts and with the most patent sophisms. When, for instance, palaeontology had proved that in past periods animal forms had existed widely differing from the present species, Cuvier established his Doctrine of Catastrophism, in order to preserve his dogma of the immuta- bility of the species. According to this theory each period of the earth's history had been distinguished by a fauna and flora peculiar to itself. Enormous revolutions of the surface of the earth, floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and glacial floods had then at one blow wiped out the entire plant and animal world, and thus terminated one period. On the new virgin soil a new fauna and flora had been created, by a divine act, thus possessing no connection either with the organisms in the pre- ceding or in the subsequent earth periods. During Cuvier's time the great naturalist, Jean Baptiste Lamarck, and with him, Geoffrey St.-Hilaire, strongly opposed this dogma of the fixity of the species, but could not avail against the almost unlimited authority of Cuvier who had then been raised to the peerage of France. On the contrary, the theory of descent suffered complete defeat in the debate between Cuvier and St.-Hilaire before the French Academy in 1830, and consequently disappeared for years from the scientific agenda. How deeply this controversy affected the leading spirits of those restless times is shown by a dialogue between Goethe, then a very old man, and his friend Soret. It was on August 2, 1830 ; the news of the expulsion of Charles X. from the throne of France had just reached Germany and all the world was talking about it. On the morning of this day Soret had called on Goethe who greeted him with these words: 'Ah! what do you think of this great event ? The volcano is in full eruption, everything is aflame, and it is no longer possible to deal with the matter behind locked doors.' FROM THALES TO LAMARCK 9 'It is indeed a terrible thing,' replied Soret ; 'but what else could you expect, with such conditions and such a Cabinet, than the expulsion of the Koyal Family ? ' ' You seem to misunderstand me,' said Goethe, ' I am not thinking of those people ; I am speaking of the rupture which has taken place before the French Academy between Cuvier and St.-Hilaire ! This matter is of the utmost importance to science and you can have no idea of my feelings at these news. We have now in St.-Hilaire a powerful ally.' It was only some time after Cuvier's death, when K. E. A. Hoff and the great English geologist Charles Lyell had proved irrefutably that the evolution of the earth had taken place in obedience to the same laws that still govern it and that the various periods of the earth's history were connected by gradual stages, that the theory of catastrophism fell, and with it the hypothesis of the invariability of the species. That even such a clear thinker as Cuvier came to assume the coming, at certain periods, of enormous catastrophes which annihilated all life was probably not so much due to the in- fluence of traditions — Indian, Arabic, Biblical — but rather to the fact that at that time it was general greatly to underestimate the periods which had elapsed since the earth had become a unit in the universe. To compress within a few thousand years the evolution of what Nature had used millions of years to achieve meant of necessity the assumption of all-destroying catastrophes. Indeed, the history of the world would be nothing but a blood- stained record of murder and destruction if we were to assume that it had covered but a few decades. The first man who clearly enunciated the idea of evolution is the poet and naturalist Dr. Erasmus Darwin, the grand- father of Charles Darwin. The works of this man, in par- ticular his 'Zoonornia, or The Laws of Organic Life' (1794), contain by the side of numerous profound observations, often almost of a prophetic character, many childlike conceptions even of the simplest processes of life. On one side we find the free outlook of the far-seeing naturalist ; on the other, the short- sightedness of teleological dogma. But that fact cannot lessen his merits, for Erasmus Darwin was the first who taught the variability of the species and the adaptation of an organ to its 10 LECTUKES ON BIOLOGY use, though what the forces were that affected variation and adaptation was a question to which he was unable to give a satisfactory answer. In Germany it was above all Goethe who advocated the theory of descent in numerous important works, but the most prominent predecessor of the great Darwin is doubtless Jean Baptiste Lamarck. In vain Lamarck waited during a long laborious life, the last seventeen years of which were spent in total blindness, for the recognition of his contemporaries. His numerous writings remained either unknown or were misunder- stood. Only now, when almost a century has passed since his death, it seems as if his work shall at last receive its due share of praise, for during recent years a strong tendency has shown itself not only among botanists but also zoologists to turn back to the teachings of this great, unhappy man. According to Lamarck, the simplest organisms originated by spontaneous generation (Urzeugung) out of inorganic matter when the earth had sufficiently cooled to permit of the existence of life. In the course of vast periods the living species of plants and animals developed out of these lowest forms by slow and gradual changes. The last and highest development was man. In contrast to modern biogenetic conceptions which represent the evolution of the organic world in the shape of ;i tree of many branches, Lamarck conceived the animal world as a uniform series of stages ascending from the unicellular protozoon to man. Lamarck perceived the cause of the changes in the organic world and the origin of new species to be that with the pro- gressing cooling of the earth's crust the conditions of life for both plants and animals underwent a continuous if gradual change. If the organisms had not possessed the faculty of adapting them- selves to the new conditions it would have been inevitable that after the lapse of thousands or millions of years forms that once were well adapted would cease to be so and perish. But we can clearly see that the animals of the present day are as well adapted to present conditions as were the animals of earlier periods to the conditions then existing. It is, therefore, indubitable that hand in hand with the changes of the earth there must have gone on a continuous change in the organisms. Hence the question arises, FROM THALES TO LAMARCK 11 Which forces have been responsible for this development ? To this Lamarck replies, that ' it is the change of function of the individual organs which brings about this seeming miracle.' We may at any time observe in our own body the effects of the use or disuse of an organ. Systematic exercise produces better and stronger muscles ; the fibres not only increase in volume, but are also able to act and contract more quickly. Con- versely, want of action produces slackness and degeneration of the fibres. A person whom illness or accident keeps to the bed and from all action knows that after a few weeks the legs will be so weakened as scarcely to be able to support the weight of the body. Like a child, the patient must perforce once more strengthen the muscles by gradual exercises, that is, he must again learn to walk. Supposing that it were possible to transmit to the next generation the primary constituents (Anlagen) of such characters newly acquired by exercise — (in this case the invigora- tion or degeneration of the muscle fibres) — and that this and following generations would act similarly, organisms might eventually be found which would be widely differentiated from their original parents ; for it is obvious that a radical modifica- tion of the muscles would in one way or another influence also the development of the other parts of the body. Who does not know Lamarck's instance of the giraffe? In earlier times giraffes were probably, like other ruminants, of normal build, nor differing greatly in the neck from their congeners. The severe competition arising on the ordinary grazing grounds from the presence of other herbivorous animals forced the giraffes to profit by their comparative height and seek nourish- ment on the branches of trees. The continual stretching and exercising of the neck caused a richer circulation, a better feeding of the muscles and other tissues, and a slight addition to its length which was transmitted to the offspring. Continued in subsequent generations, this process gradually produced in the course of many thousands of years an abnormally long neck such as we see to-day. — The web between the toes of the waterfowl is said to have been caused through the habit of these birds of seeking their prey on the water and of spreading out their toes as widely as possible in order to swim better. The continued stimulus acting upon the skin between the toes gradually effected 12 LECTURES ON BIOLOGY a stronger development of these parts. Similarly one might explain with more or less probability of truth the origin of most organs. On the other hand, as we have already seen, disuse leads to reversion and degeneration of the affected parts. If an organ was deprived of work owing to altered conditions of life, gradual degeneration followed of necessity. Thanks to the conservatism of heredity, the organs may for some time be retained in the successors, but finally the last .vestige is lost. The numerous rudimentary organs form ample illustrations of this phenomenon. We need only mention, among many other similar instances, the loss of eyes in many cave-animals, the degenerate eyes of the mole, the breast glands of male animals, and the muscle of the human ear, whereby it can be pulled upwards or twitched forward or backward. In all nature there is hardly another case in which one may so clearly see the adaptation of an organ to its functions and the improving or degenerating influence of use and disuse as in the development of the arms and legs of the vertebrates. However different the extremities of vertebrates may externally appear, it is possible to demonstrate, if not in the adult, at any rate in the embryonic stage, that on the whole they possess similar bones and are thus proved to be of common origin. Fishes represent the lowest stage of the vertebrates. In these denizens of the water the extremities have developed into instruments of rowing, or fins. These are either paired or unpaired. We know that the unpaired extremities are derived from a continuous dorsal fringe which commences immediately behind the head and continues to the anus. In earliest youth this uniform fringe divides itself in most fishes into dorsal and anal fins, and the great locomotor fin of the tail. In a similar manner the paired fins originate from two at first continuous lateral folds which divide later into the two anterior pectoral and ventral fins. Soon afterwards solid skeleton parts appear in the skin folds, giving to the whole the necessary stability. Of these two kinds of extremities, the unpaired are phylogeneticaily the earlier, for we find them already in the lower types of fishes, the primitive fish Branchiostoma (Amphioxus), and in the Lampreys (Cyclostoma), which are as yet without paired fins. Being FROM THALES TO LAMARCK 13 specially adapted to a life in the water, the unpaired fins dis- appear with the departure from the moist element. In the amphibians we find in the larval stage a com- plete rudimentary fringe, though without skeleton parts ; but it becomes, as a rule, de- generate in the adult stage. The paired FIG. I.— THE LANCELET (Brancliiostvma extremities, however, lanceoiatum). reach in the higher vertebrates a more and more perfect development, for they help the animals to add to the conquest of the water that of the land and the air. They are therefore of special interest from the standpoint of comparative anatomy. All extremities of the higher vertebrates, however widely they may differ in construction, may be traced back biogenetic- ally to the so-called Ichthyopterygium, as we see it in the fins of the lower shark-like fishes. Unequal growth of the single skeleton parts and a considerable reduction in their numbers transformed the Ichthyopterygium into the five-fingered extremity characteristic of all vertebrates from the amphibians upwards. But yet another change is demanded by the changed conditions of life. As long as the extremities served as oars or rudders it was an advantage that they developed into broad ' blades,' acting with their entire surface. But on land the arms and legs are to act as levers in carrying and moving the body. To do this, the extremities must divide into small parts united together and movable one upon the other ; in other words, they must form joints. Everyone who has seen the skeleton of a bird will no doubt object that in the denizen of the air nothing is to be seen of a five-fingered extremity, and in most cases indeed nothing but one finger. This objection is true, but it is obviously the different function which causes the deviation from the rule and produces frequently in the skeletons of adult animals considerable reversion or a combination of the single skeleton parts, thus making the affected parts better adapted to their special work. 14 LECTUEES ON BIOLOGY But it can be proved biogenetically and phylogenetically that most of these animals have descended from five-fingered ancestors, or at any rate from such as had more than one finger. At an early stage of incubation of the embryo of the penguin we can readily distinguish three well-developed fingers and the rudiments (Anlagen) of a fourth. The Archseopteryx of the Jurassic period when fully developed had three movable fingers. Let us endeavour to make clear the radical influence of changed condi- tions of life by the consideration of a few prominent instances. If we observe a fish in its natural element and notice how perfectly adapted are its fins to life and movement in the water we would hardly think it possible that these specially developed organs could be used for other than swimming actions. Yet we know fishes who, with the aid of their fins, are not only able to run, climb, and jump, but even to traverse not inconsider- able distances flying. It was, of course, necessary for the fins of these privileged animals to undergo extensive changes to qualify them for their different functions. In fishmongers' shops one may now and then see a very quaint and awkward-looking fish, the Sapphirine Gurnard or Tub-fish (Trigla hirundo). It is from 40 to 60 cm. long and a well-known inhabitant of the North Sea. It has a rounded body and a thick, square head, protected by an armour of rough skin. When touched it makes a peculiar noise which reminds one of the creaking of a badly-oiled door, by rubbing together its hard gill-covers. We know that the fins of fishes are supported by cartilaginous rays which are generally firmly joined to the fin. But in the gurnard the strongly developed pectoral fins have in front three free, fin-like rays which seem fixed to the body after the manner of joints. In swimming, these free fin-rays are folded backwards against the body, but on the sea-floor the fish uses them skilfully as legs and is thus able to walk. It is a curious sight to see it deliberately putting one ray before the other and drawing its plump body slowly along the sea-floor when in search of its prey. A near relative of the gurnard is the Flying Gurnard (Dactyl- opterus volitans), abundant in the Mediterranean, and a repre- sentative of the flying-fishes. The structure of this fish reminds one strongly of his cousin of the North, but is much smaller, at FKOM THALES TO LAMARCK 15 the most 40 cm. It is distinguished from its relative by the extraordinary development of its pectoral fins, the posterior section of which broadens into a fan and is supported by cartila- ginous fin-rays which are nearly 30 cm. long. Every passenger through the Mediterranean may in clear weather sometimes see great shoals of these fishes suddenly emerge from the water, rise to a height of about 18 ft. and traverse fairly quickly a FIG. 2. — ABOVE, HADDOCK (Gadus