si) IEE ah 7 SPORT PACTE oT C SLOPE Horace Annesley Va Vachell LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, ~ ¥ _ Chay Copyright No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Vis Wh Pa at nM At Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope hte es sas On CAL? ; tne heige sens \f iS (} j Rye AGT TAS, M7, + ' vi Fs Cen mon), ‘ee *) ‘VINVOAITVO NYUNLOOS NI HSNO ASOU Vy Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope By a Horace Annesley Vachell Author of «The Procession of Life,’? «*A Drama in Sunshine,’’ etc. @ New York Dodd, Mead and Company Igol Library of Congress! Two Cortes Recenrn | FEB 18 19u] Copyright entry 1,19 70 ee ey Ae ewer ee ey SECOND COPY Copyright, 1900 By Dopp, MEapD anpD COMPANY All rights reserved UNIVERSITY PRESS . JOHN WILSON AND SON + CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A. TO fay Father-in-La, CHAUNCEY HATCH PHILLIPS, WHO, BORN IN THE EAST, IS ESSENTIALLY OF THE WEST, I DEDICATE THIS BOOK. Neh, d Ribé . YS Ta isa ie) eas Lead at Pi Ma fe OY ea shy Cer EA fal ny a Maney ays aye at A UNC NT *' fan .) ay a a\ ay AS Vie 'a’e ' a its ’ viet 7 We oe 4; i vie a % it vi 0 La : “y Hy x ye al * i we ii ARMA Prefa tory Note My Dear CutEr,—lI dedicate this book to you with profound pleasure, in acknowledgment of an affection and sympathy which have been sealed by a great sorrow. From your hands I received a loyal, loving wife; but the fact that she was born in California has not shackled my lips in speaking of the West. She, I know, would have entreated me to write with a free hand; and if at times I seem to criticise somewhat harshly certain women who, consciously or unconsciously, are widening the gulf between their husbands and themselves, let it be remembered by my friends that I have judged these women according to a standard set by a daughter of the West, a standard of tenderness, fidelity, unselfishness, and modesty to which few wives, be their country what it may, can attain. Many and many a time have you and [ talked over the subjects treated in these pages; but Vili Prefatory Note although our opinions clashed now and again, our intercourse continued absolutely free from friction and discord. ‘That intercourse, which began seven- teen years ago, and our friendship, which sunshine could not wither nor shadow obscure, have indirectly inspired this volume. But I ask you to shoulder no responsibility in regard to it; and whether you ap- prove what I have written or not, believe me, Most affectionately yours, HoracE ANNESLEY VACHELL. Horsey, Winchester. CHAPTER Contents THe LAND or To-mMoRROW . THE MEN OF THE WEST THE WOMEN OF THE WEST THE CHILDREN OF THE WEST Rancaw Lrg, I. . Rancu# Lirs, II. Business LIFE ANGLO-FRANCO-CALIFORNIANS . THE ENGLISHMAN IN THE West, I. THE ENGLISHMAN IN THE West, II. THE SripE-SHOW PoT-POURRI ETHICAL Bic GAME SHOOTING . SMALL GAME SHOOTING, I. . SMALL GAmE SuHoorTIne, II. SEA FISHING FresH WATER FISHING 107 131 149 161 177 191 205 229 249 273 289 307 335 x Contents APPENDICES CHAPTER i PAGE Aw “SPA TISTECB i CL Nar ee SO Ries Seo 4 w Cs] op oy yor. ADM eae eAM Ae MPSS Ch bee Ce 2) 106 CURA ge rol op fad og 2 RPS NOE Menno DAP PL TV NH icp) fey. LOR 55) high OH oy Fe uk ue tO PRONE use Nice La rs, ME i Te Rea 6 eek Pa 8 ita ia fat UN ee WI. Bits 20 SPORTAMEN (00 io a eae ee I THE LAND OF TO-MORROW ‘ 1 i Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope si THE LAND OF TO-MORROW OT long ago I saw the sun rise in a Surrey garden. Standing at an open window I looked down upon dew-laden, silvery lawns that sloped to a lovely mere. In the mid-distance the mist lay like a velvety blur upon the woods skirting the northern bank of the Thames. It veiled, too, the great cedars and elms in the garden, robbing them of colour and substance, so that they seemed, as it were, grey ghosts,—spectral sentinels of an Eden whence the glory had departed. The mist began to melt beneath the kiss of an August sun, and I lingered at my window, waiting expectantly for what would be revealed, as if I were a stranger to the garden and its beauties. Very soon the trees and shrubs and flowers were clearly defined, fresh and glowing. Against the yew hedge that encom- passed this pleasaunce was an herbaceous border. Here, great salmon-pink hollyhocks towered above the graceful larkspurs — dark and pale blue. Below these again were those sweet vagabonds the corn- flowers, the stocks, the verbenas, and snapdragons. 4 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Fringing the border were the gaudy calceolarias. Not for the first time I was struck by the amazing finish of the picture, its exquisite texture and quality. And I reflected that in Surrey alone there are hun- dreds of such gardens, and that they represent the care and the culture of a thousand years. Looking at this perfect miniature I was fain to contrast it with a picture I knew and loved in another land seven thousand miles away. I could see in fancy a great valley sloping westerly to a great ocean. Upon the face of this landscape lay the same glad freshness of morning. And here too the mist had spread her magical carpet, obscur- ing the bare plains, veiling the rude houses and barns, blotting out, in fine, the works of man while lending unearthly beauty to the works of God. In both pictures was revealed the hand of the Master. And the less included the greater, even as the infinite spaces of the sky are reflected in a dewdrop. The Surrey garden was an epitome of yesterday and to-day. Upon the other, the great valley sloping to the Pacific, broods the promise of to-morrow. This Land of To-morrow includes within itself the - material resources of all the nations. It has a great seaboard, rich valleys, mountains of minerals, vast forests, rivers, lakes, reservoirs of oil (the fuel of to-morrow), and a people not to be matched in energy, patience, pluck, and executive ability. Fifty years ago this was the Lotos Land, where life was essentially Arcadian, pastoral and _ patri- archal. Another race dwelt upon the shores of the The Land of To-Morrow 5 Pacific, the Hispano-Californians, who ate and drank and made merry. Some of them may still be found south of Point Concepcion; they have absolutely nothing left — except their charming manners. When I came to the Pacific Slope, in 82, you might find, here and there, a ranchero, the lord of many acres, of many flocks and herds. At his house a warm welcome awaited the stranger. The men of the family, the caballeros, entertained their guests with feats of horsemanship, barbecues, and stories of the past. The sefioritas danced and sang. The word “work” was seldom mentioned. These were simple primitive people: content with little, grate- ful to God for the blessings vouchsafed them, truly free, if we may accept their own testimony, and truly happy. Such as they were, however, the Pacific Slope will never see their like again. Their songs, | remember, were infinitely tonching. One had a pathetic refrain (it was a favourite with the sefioritas): Adzos, adios, para siempre adios. I never heard it sung without reflecting that this — so to speak —was the swan-song of the Latin to the all-conquering Anglo-Saxon. During the fifty years that followed the American occupation of the West so much has been accom- plished that an encyclopedia would hardly find room for facts. In the appendices of this book will be found figures taken from reliable sources that will serve to faintly indicate what has been done. By applying to these figures the rule of geometrical progression some conception may be formed of what will be done — to-morrow. It will be conceded, I think, that so far as Cali- 6 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope fornia, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia are concerned the experimental stage has been passed. Mining, for instance, has become an exact science. The same may be said of fruit culture, viticulture, the breeding of fine horses and catile, the making of wine and oil, cereal-raising, and man- ufactures. The cruiser upon whose bridge stood Admiral Dewey when he entered the harbour of Manila was built in San Francisco. An immense battle-ship, “The Oregon,” doubled Cape Horn with- out misadventure, a marvellous feat. Her keel was laid in the ship-yards of the West. The modern war ship is a machine so complex, combining in itself so many of the arts and sciences, so incom- parably difficult of nice adjustment, that it would seem to be the ne plus ultra of human ingenuity and mechanical skill. To the hands and brains that have constructed an “Oregon” nothing can be deemed impracticable. ) I shall now set forth, as briefly as may be, my reasons for speaking of the Pacific Slope as the land of To-morrow. The people who live in the West are profoundly convinced that their country is a land of to-day. More, the word “to-morrow” has an offensive signification. California, for instance, ~ was once known as the land of “ mafiana,’ a land where nothing must be done to-day that could pos- sibly be put off till to-morrow. Time has brought many changes to the Pacific Slope, but none more amazing than the change from ignorance and indolence to activity and intelligence. But the promise of the future dwarfs the perform- ance of the present. Heretofore, despite her unpar- The Land of To-Morrow 7 alleled resources, California has been, for the many, terra incognita. Over and over again I have been asked the most absurd questions. A lady of rank and fashion told me only the other day that she hoped to visit California, because she wished to see the — Andes. Another thought that the Golden State belonged to England. A third was interested in Yo Semite, but feared the terrors of the wilder- ness. She really believed that I roamed my ranch clad in skins of wild beasts, that the plains were black with Apaches, the towns at the mercy of des- peradoes! Some of my friends have greeted me on my return to England as if I were a long lost ex- plorer. “ How glad you must be,” they say, holding my hand in a fervent clasp, “ to find yourself once more in a civilised country.” When I explain that I have been living in a town of thirty thousand people, a town better lighted, better kept, more abundantly blessed with the amenities of life, than two-thirds of the cathedral towns of England, I am confronted by a pitying stare. I remember taking some English travellers to a luncheon at the country house of a Californian. After luncheon a drag came round, and we went for a drive. The visitors cocked bewildered eyes at the coach, the harness, the servants, the horses. When their surprise found words, they overwhelmed our host with compliments far too florid for his taste. Silence would have been a subtler form of commen- dation. French visitors would have conveyed their sense of pleasure and concealed their amazement. But this ignorance of the West is passing away, and with it will pass the fear also, that fear which 8 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope a great raw boy so often inspires in his elders. In a certain sense the West has been running amok. It has had a stormy youth. It has played queer pranks. Talk to the wise men of the East — why is wisdom supposed to dwell in the East? —and they will shake their hoary heads at the mere men- tion of the West. Some of them, doubtless, have suffered real pain, finding themselves in the grip of a young giant unconscious of his strength. Gold has come out of California and been sown broadcast all over the earth. There is no advertisement like gold. Even wise men are dazzled by the sight of it. And accordingly the very name of California became a synonym of the precious metal. Men who were unwilling to leave their snug hearths sent some of their savings to the State that was called golden. And it is to be feared that these savings were never seen again. In Wall Street, in the city of London, on the continental bourses, Californian mining stocks were freely bought and sold. But, for the most part, the great fortunes were made by the Californi- ans themselves: the Fairs, the Floods, the Mackays, of bonanza times. The outsiders, who — like Kip- ling’s woman —did not know, who never could know, and did not understand, lost their money and with it their faith in the El Dorado on the shores of the Pacific. Although gold was being taken by the ton from the mountains and streams, although the country was extraordinarily prosperous, yet the bottom —as the phrase runs — was out of the boom. California had the whooping-cough. The measles followed in due course. In mining times, land was held at a few cents an acre. The The Land of To-Morrow 9 dons who owned hundreds of leagues were in the habit of giving it away. A miner, shrewder than his fellows, asked Mariano Vallejo for a farm. Vallejo gave him eight thousand acres of fine land, and bade him take more if he wanted more. Others followed. The Haggins, the Tevises, the Millers ac- quired principalities for a song. When the psycho- logical moment came, these vast ranchos were subdivided and put on the market, on the world’s market. Mr. Nordhoff wrote a book about California that was widely read. Pamphlets, maps, special editions of newspapers, lecturers, agents of the trans- portation companies, Boards of Trade, proclaimed the virtues of Californian soil. Of course, the facts, quite amazing enough in themselves, were embel- lished. It was a day of individual successes. One man had cleared four hundred pounds sterling from one acre of cherries! Another had made a fortune out of apricots, or oranges, or ostriches. Not a word was said of the patience, labour, and special knowledge that had made such results possible. Reading the pamphlets one was not only assured of success, but failure was proved to be impossible. The prose, in which these alluring statistics were embalmed, was homely enough, mere fustian, but the poetry that lay between the lines of it might have lent enchantment toa dustbin. Great stress was laid upon the climate. To the farmer in the East, or mid-West, to the British labourer, to the French or German peasant, —all of them groaning and travailing under conditions more or less intoler- able, the slaves of the elements, the playthings of cy- clones and blizzards, — to these poor weary workers, 10 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope life beneath the soft blue skies of California was pictured as a sort of triumphant procession. And so it proved — for a season or two. I remember planting potatoes —the Early Rose variety — upon some land for which I had just paid (in ’82) five dollars an acre. My neighbours, men of flocks and herds, laughed at my folly. They too had read the pamphlets, and sneered at the predic- tions of the prophets. According to them, land in Southern California was adapted to pastoral uses — and nothing else. I was pronounced a tenderfoot with money to burn. The potatoes were planted in virgin soil. They increased and multiplied. In due time the crop was sacked and sold. After pay- ing expenses, I found that I had cleared about one hundred dollars per acre ! I could cite a thousand such instances. During the decade that followed, the Pacific Slope was peopled with petty farmers and fruit-growers. Land values steadily rose in obedience to the im- mutable laws of demand and supply. The men of flocks and herds, the ‘‘silurians” as they were called, the “ moss-backs,” ploughed up their pastures and sold their sheep and cattle. The spirit of the times had them by the throat. These patriarchs, knowing but one business (and that indifferently well), became of a sudden horticulturists, wine- makers, fruit-growers, or dealers in real estate. They no longer laughed at others, they laughed with them. Everybody laughed. A broad grin rested on the face of the landscape. We were all blowing soap-bubbles, and that is glorious sport when you are young. And there was plenty of The Land of To-Morrow II soap. It greased — so to speak — the ways of every enterprise. Heavens! what crazy crafts put to sea! Town properties began to boom. At Los Angeles men stood patiently in line for many hours waiting to buy lots which they had never seen. The same lot was sold again and again within a week. New towns were hastily surveyed and put up at public auction. The bidders fought with each other for the privilege of securing corner lots on avenues that were laid out on— paper. These auctions were ad- vertised in all the daily papers; excursions were organised ; the railroads, of course, had more than a finger in the pie. When the new town-site was reached, meat and drink were provided for the hun- gry and excited buyers. A band furnished appro- priate music. Looking back it seems incredible that we could have been such fools. The craze affected all alike, rich and poor, young and old, wise and simple. If you had no money the banks clamoured for your patronage. Their gold lay in shining piles upon the counters. You could borrow what you pleased — atten per cent. The men of business, the trades- men, the lawyers, the doctors, and the parsons bought land. We were all, in a sense, thieves, for we robbed Peter to pay Paul. The saloons did a roaring trade. Champagne, at a sovereign a bottle, was the only liquor fit to slake the thirst of the Native Sons. They smoked shilling cigars ; fat per- fectos, encircled with gaudy paper bands upon which was inscribed “ Habana.” Some of these full-flav- oured weeds were made by Chinese cheap labour in the stews of San Francisco. Perhaps the opium in 12 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope them lulled to sleep the prudence of the smokers. Who can tell ? During these halcyon days there were no Popo- crats, no Silverites (for silver— as in the time of Solomon — was counted as dross), no Unemployed. Everything being upside down, the man became the master. I remember that I was graciously per- mitted to pay my cook eighty-four pounds a year for services worth, as we compute results in Europe, a ten-pound note. Theranch hands wore diamonds. On Sunday they arrayed themselves in suits of broad- cloth at fifteen pounds the suit, silk-lined ; they took their “ best girls” for drives in well-appointed bug- gies drawn by fast pairs of trotters. As for the young ladies, I dare not describe their toz/ettes. But the outward and visible sign of this amazing _ prosperity was most manifest in the houses (they were always spoken of as residences) which — like Aladdin’s palace — seemed to be built and furnished in a single night. .A propos of them I have a story: I was in a Pullman car, and we were passing through a valley dotted with most unsightly houses, — ram- shackle buildings, for the most part, each an amal- gam of half a dozen styles of architecture, each obviously built for show. “What are yon?” said an old Scotchman, who was of the party. “ They ’re private residences,” replied an American, proudly. “Yes, sip, we’re passing through Paradise Park. Six months ago, sir, this tract was a howling desert of cactus and sage brush.” “Eh, eh-h-h? Ye surprise me. Private resi- dences, ye say?” The Land of To-Morrow 13 “Yes, sir. What do you take them for?” The old Scotchman answered soberly: “I was of the opeenion that they must be lunatic asylums.” A big fellow, evidently a cattleman from Arizona, burst into Homeric laughter. “ Jee-roo-salem!” he exclaimed. “That’s just exactly what they avr.” Of course adversity trod hard upon the heels of her twin, prosperity. The pendulum began to swing the other way. We had had, as I have said, the measles, and the body politic was enfeebled and anemic. Bad prices, an over-glutted market, drought, frost, and blight, set their stigmata upon us. “ Laugh,” says Mrs. Wilcox, “and the world laughs with you: weep — and you weep alone.” Our laughter had rung through the East and Europe. Our youth and high spirits had enchanted the older civilisations. Now, recovering from a contagious disease, we were constrained to mourn alone, in silence and seclusion. The contrast between the smiles of the past and the tears of the present would have been pronounced humorous had it not been pathetic. When I first came to the West, I was speaking one day to a Californian of London and the glories thereof. He listened politely, but when I had finished he said meaningly: “London is all right, though it ain’t Paris, but both of them are — remote.” To him, San Francisco was the centre of the solar system: the sun itself. Only last year I happened to meet the same man. His forehead, I noted, was puckered with perplexity ; his clothes were shabby; his linen was not im- — maculate; he smoked a pipe. After a minute’s 14 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope talk, he said to me, feverishly: “Say, what ails California ? ” I told him that, in my humble opinion, the hard times were over, that the future was rosy with the blush, not the flush, of returning health, and that California would be richer and stronger and wiser than she had ever been before. My friend’s expres- sive face brightened. “The State is all right,” he replied earnestly. “The trouble lies with us. We’ve had a bad dose of the swelled head. And now,” he added mourn- fully, “we ’ve got cold feet.” In the slang that comes so pat to the lips of a Western man, he had said — everything. When California begins to laugh again, the world will laugh with her. She is smiling already. The discovery of gold in the tributaries of the Yukon, the opening up of Alaska, the acquisition of the Philip- pine Islands, railroad competition, the Oriental trade, the possibilities that encompass the cutting of a canal across the Isthmus of Panama,! and the com- pletion of the Trans-Siberian Railway, the discover- ies of coal fields and oil wells, these — to name only a few — are the heralds of a progress and prosperity that must prove radical and enduring? 1 Since writing the above the Panama Canal has become the property of American capitalists. 2 The Hon. John Barrett, late United States Minister to Siam, writes: “Three great States, California, Oregon, and Washington, forging ahead in material strength with tremendous strides, de- veloping vast resources, increasing rapidly in population, and pos- sessing mighty potentialities yet to be exploited, debouch with . their entire western boundaries upon the Pacific, and look to it for The Land of To-Morrow iy I am not prepared to discuss the pros and cons of Imperialism in a book which merely professes to be a pot-pourrt of personal experience; but I can understand why the word itself is offensive to many good Americans. Expansion, to my mind, better expresses the purpose and policy of those who have annexed the Philippines. Already, we are told, the bill to be paid for these islands amounts to more than two hundred millions of dollars: a large sum, but not too heavy a price to pay for that moral expansion which has revitalised a country needing perhaps no fresh territory. Al- though I use the word “moral” I am confining myself to practical politics. The sentimentalists, the men of Utopia, are as usual astride the fence. We know only too well that from them proceed, in endless prolixity, empty words,— vow, et preterea mhil. But even to those who take the world as it is, to those whose eyes are undimmed by party prejudice, the annexation of the Philippines and the protectorate of Cuba mean something far more im- portant than the acquisition of rich territory, or the right to take a leading place in the councils of the nations. It is very questionable to the writer whether the one or other of these is worth much a goodly share of their future prosperity... . If we include the long winding coast of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands, we have a grand total of nearly thirty-five hundred miles facing the Pacific. . . . China, Japan, Siberia, Siam, the Philippines, and Korea, not only want the flour of the Pacific Coast, but they are developing a growing demand for timber, manufactured food supplies, and a long list of lesser products.” Note. — The grand total of Pacific trade exchange — exports and imports — was $210,000,000 for the year 1898. 16 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope in hard cash to the United States; but it does seem absolutely certain —if the testimony of the past is to be accepted — that with nations as with individuals a policy of self-sufficiency, of restric- tion, and of isolation, is demoralising, and in the end disintegrating. The Spanish-American war, where millionaire and cowboy fought side by side in the ranks, did more to adjust the relations be- tween rich and poor than all the synthetic philoso- phies of the world. Expansion will create new and enlarge old professions; it must have a permanent civil service, a diplomatic corps, an army, an ade- quate navy, a merchant marine; but these are merely the phylacteries of evolution; beneath and unseen lie the quickening pulses of a life richer in its opportunities, wider in its scope, more varied and variegated, a life in sympathy and in touch with others, a life that is ampler, nobler, freer, and happier than the life which lives in and for itself alone. As the egg of an eagle is to the monarch of the air, so is the incubation to the “hatch and the disclose” of a great nation. However, dismissing the subject of Imperialism as one not germane to these pages, we must remem- ber that rightly or wrongly the Philippines and Hawaii now belong to the United States, and that their possession affects the future of the Pacific Slope more than any other part of Uncle Sam’s domain. Californians, at any rate, have no cause to complain of or criticise a policy which must — benefit directly and indirectly every farmer and merchant west of the Rocky Mountains. It has been computed that the Philippines’ imports from The Land of To-Morrow 17 foreign countries (including Spain), compared with the imports from the United States, were in the ratio of thirty-three to one. This fact indicates the volume of trade awaiting a market nearer (China excepted) by thousands of miles than any I have named. Roughly speaking the imports into the Philippines are some ten millions, while the exports will be about twice as much. But this is nothing. Mr. John Foreman, in his book entitled “The Philippines” (London, 1899), says that the possibilities of development are so great that the next generation will look back with astonishment at the statistics of to-day. If Mr. Foreman proves a prophet, San Francisco will be one of the five great cities of the world. She has a harbour that can be entered by any ship afloat, at any time of the tide, and at all seasons of the year; a harbour vastly superior to New York harbour; a harbour with an anchorage of seventy-nine square miles! New York has an anchorage of nine and a half miles. Let us make, however, no mistake. The West, intellectually and morally, has proven itself both wild and woolly. The healthiest sign of a vigor- ous recovery is the recognition of this by the people themselves. Cold feet may be quickly warmed; a swelled head is not so easily treated. For the present the Pacific Slope is—so to speak —in the corner. Our nurses, the great capitalists, have their eyes upon us, but we must be careful. It is time for us to put aside childish things, the swaddling-clothes of conceit and ignorance, and to assume instead the toga of manly modesty. 2 18 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Then, and not till then, we can take our rightful place in the senate-house of the world. When I was asked to write this book, I replied that although I was provided with matter for it, the varied experiences of seventeen years, yet the manner of setting them forth adequately would prove, I feared, beyond my powers. I have reason to know that the people of the West are extremely sensitive to criticism — especially from Englishmen. And having many warm friends in the West, having, moreover, many connections by marriage amongst them, wishing, if I did write at all, to write with entire frankness, I hesitated for a long time before I undertook a task that may be best described by the old Greek word of — “ bitter-sweet.” In the Greek it is “sweet-bitter,” for the ancients held that the bitter follows the sweet—and re- mains. We, as Christians, hold otherwise. With us the sweet prevails and endures. Speaking per- sonally—and it is only as an individual who has lived many years of his life in the West that I am entitled to a hearing—1 would say emphatically that the bitter has passed from me. Were it not so I would hold my tongue. More, had I not © suffered in common with the people of the West, did I not know, as they know, the peculiar trials and temptations of a new country, if I was not willing to share the blame, to shoulder my part of the load, I would lay down my pen before it is hardly wet. My object is primarily to show what life in the West zs, not what it ought to be. 1 believe in the Pacific Slope. I am profoundly con- The Land of To-Morrow 19 vinced that it has a great and glorious future before it; and that it stands to-day upon the threshold of that future. If Horace Greeley were alive, I am sure that he would repeat his famous dictum: Young man — go West. Il THE MEN OF THE WEST im th ‘ SNS: Bray nen Gre AUS A ‘ fi) VERSA NOLL ve aA! Vv bh Penh i ae J II THE MEN OF THE WEST UCH was forgiven to Mary Magdalene, quia multum amavit, and much may be for- given to the sowers of the West because they have laboured so hard and so faithfully. — Nice customs curtsey to great kings, they grovel before con- querors. And the men who apprehended the pos- sibilities of the West, who not only crossed the plains, and the forests, and the mountains, but who recrossed them with shining ribands of steel, were — Cesars, endowed with the strength and the weak- ness of giants. You must consider them and their actions, in the aggregate, panoramically, as you would survey a Californian landscape. The English traveller, who merely touches the phylacteries of American life, always lays stress upon the dollar as being the unit of value on the Pacific Slope. According to this authority we are money-grabbers, worshippers of the Golden Calf, sacrificing to the god our own flesh and_ blood. And yet no people on earth are more truly lavish with their gold than the men of the West; no people care less for gold as gold; no people greet the loss of it with greater fortitude and good-temper. What gold represents — power and success — is dear to the Native Son, for he knows that he can- not plead as an excuse for failure the burdens of 24 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope tradition and convention that hamper the strivers in older countries. In the West runners are nude when they start: the race is to the swift, the battle to the strong. ach is given credit for what he does, not for what he is. Indeed, in a country where the only gentlemen of leisure are tramps, it is shameful to be other than a bread-winner. Dives works harder than Lazarus. Only the other day a millionaire, a comparatively young man, was stricken down. He died of —over-work. Why did he not take it easy? Surely, he had enough. I knew this man, and he told me that he laboured more diligently than the meanest clerk in his employ, and for practically the same wage: clothes, board, and lodging. He dared not do less than he did. It is against the spirit of the West to shirk responsibilities. Mr. Clarence Urmy, a Californian, whose tuneful verses are familiar to readers of American maga- zines, has written some charming lines upon this theme. According to Mr. Urmy, those only fail who strive not. The sentiment is as pretty as the verses that embalm it. And it is a sentiment essentially of the West. But it would be truer to say that only those who strive can know the bitterness of failure. In a new country the strife is so strenuous, it demands so many sacrifices, that failure becomes almost a synonym for death. God help the man who, in the accounting that comes to all of us sooner or later, finds his balance on the wrong side of the ledger. Surely, in that dark hour the sense of what he has suffered and endured becomes a crown of thorns. Later, perhaps, he The Men of the West 25 may realise that it is better to have striven in vain than not to have striven at all. The men of the West never take the word “failure” home to their wives. It is locked up, when they leave their office, in that symbol of pros- perity, the safe, which often contains nothing more valuable than the record of wasted endeavour. One and all are stoutly self-assured that if the slippery yesterdays have eluded them, if the silvery to-days belong to others, the golden to-morrows are theirs by the unalienable rights of faith and hope. The door-mat kind of man who lies down grovelling, and permits the foot-passengers to wipe their shoes upon him, is not to be found west of the Rocky Mountains. Robustly conscious of his strength, the Native Son confronts the beasts of the market- place with the same courage and determination that sustained his father in the wilderness. I have stood in the wheat-pit of San Francisco when wheat was jumping like a kangaroo. Around me were men — some of them young — who had large fortunes at stake. I saw one “bear” unmercifully gored by the stampeding “bulls.” But he picked himself up with a grin, lit a cigar, ate a capital luncheon, told a good story, and made it plain to my wondering eyes that physically, mentally, and morally, he was none the worse for his mis- adventure. Curiously enough, despite this pluck and energy, the men of business are ignorant of much that they ought, in their own interest, to know thoroughly. The average English gentleman, the magistrate and landlord, lacks the intelligence, the cleverness and 26 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope tact of his American cousin, but, narrow and prej- udiced as the Briton is in many ways, he takes the broader view in regard to the conduct of the world’s affairs. Not till the war with Spain did these challenge the serious intérest of Americans. I have read, even in sober reviews, the grossest blunders, the most absurd misrepresentation of facts within the reach of any journalist who has access to a library. In this particular regard the press is French: to please the public, to tickle the ears of the groundlings, they ignore the truth as perversely as the Dreyfusards and anti-Dreyfusards writing in the “Figaro” and the “ Hcho de Paris.” In an English party paper, say the “Standard,” you will mark that an account of a Liberal meeting will be faithfully recorded. The speeches will be printed verbatim ; the cheers, the hisses, the questions, will be honestly reported. I have never read in a Western paper a true description of a political meeting. The facts are embellished or mutilated according to the politi- cal views of the editor. Of an enemy, who in private life may be a blameless citizen, nothing too shameful can be said. He is proclaimed a Judas, a Catiline, a Nero, a Verres. Ancient history is ransacked to find his peers in infamy. This is entirely a Gallic characteristic, alien to the Anglo- Saxon spirit and love of fair play. The men who wish to be “posted” buy two daily papers, the Republican and Democratic organs, and form their opinions by what is left unsaid in both. On the other hand, the Western man is keenly conscious of his limitations. He wants to know. England is full of men who are quite convinced The Men of the West 27 that what they don’t know is not worth knowing. I can hear the voice of the old colonel, a rasping voice mellowed somewhat by sherry, as he pro- nounces all subjects without the magic circle of his own intelligence — bosh. Not so the Western man. He is catholic in his sympathies. Every- thing interests him — and everybody. He devours an essay upon liquid air and its possibilities, and turns from that with gusto to a vol au vent of political gossip, or a chaudfroid of economics. And this being so, it is a thousand pities that the cooks who cater to this appetite should not supply whole- somer diet. Western people suffer from dyspepsia, but what they eat is as Mellin’s food compared to what they read. Some months ago I was returning from a fishing tour in British Columbia. In the smoking-room of the Pullman car, I encountered a youth of about seventeen, who, taking me for a tenderfoot, pro- ceeded to set forth at great length the resources of California, its sociology, topography, and climate. I listened patiently for a couple of hours. Pres- ently he asked me if this were my first visit to his State. I replied in the negative, saying that I lived in California, that I owned land, that I was engaged in a large business. He looked uncomfortable ; then in quite a different tone he said: “Say — when did you first come to California ?” It was my turn. “You are a Native Son ?” “JT am,” he answered proudly and promptly. “ About seventeen years old?” “That’s right; seventeen last fall.” 28 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope “ Ah —well, I came to the State of California about the same time you did.” He blushed scarlet; then he laughed heartily. “Great Scott! Why didn’t you tell me to come off my perch ?” After that, he asked a number of questions and listened civilly to my replies. We parted the best of friends. An Englishman is never seen to worse advan- tage than when he is insisting upon what he is pleased to call his—rights. For in the develop- ment of character it is expedient that men should sometimes do without privileges to which they con- ceive themselves entitled. Perhaps if we clamour too persistently for our dues in this world, we may also, in the world to come, be dealt with according to our deserts. At any rate it is a charming char- acteristic of the men of the West that they are good-humouredly content with less than that to which they are legally and morally entitled. As much, be it noted, cannot be said of the women. In San Francisco, at certain times of the day, the demand for seats in the cable cars invariably ex- ceeds the supply. And the men of course always give up their seats to the ladies, who accept them — without thanks. Once, however, I saw a Briton who refused to budge. Finding the eyes of the fair upon him, he fidgeted and finally burst into speech. “You ’re all looking at me,” he said angrily ; “and you think I ought to give up my seat. Well, I’m not going to do it. And if the men of this country had more sense they ’d keep what they ’ve paid for, The Men of the West 29 and then the cable companies would provide seats enough to go round.” He was scarlet in the face before he finished, and everybody laughed. At the theatre, in church, at race meetings, coun- try fairs, at all times and in all places where a little patience and good-humour temper what is disagree- able, the people of the Pacific are at their best. Once at a performance of “ La Tosca,” some youths in the seats behind me were “ guying” the actress who was sustaining the principal role. And this to the annoyance of all of us. A man not far from me silenced them. “That lady on the stage,” he said, very politely, “is making so much noise that we cannot hear what yow are saying. But I hope we shall have the pleasure of listening to your criti- cisms later, after the act is over.” At times something more drastic is wanted. A lady had been rudely treated by some minor official of a railroad. As a rule, ticket-sellers give them- selves great airs. To women, however, they almost invariably show courtesy and consideration. This man was an exception. The lady, very indignant, at a loss for words, but with a comical sense of humour, turned to a stranger at her elbow. “ Pray, sir,’ said she, “tell this man what I think of him.” The stranger proved equal to the task set him. In a melancholy drawl, without betraying the smallest excitement, he said slowly: “Sir, this lady thinks you are an understrapper, clothed with a little brief authority, whose only qualification to the position you occupy is your — impudence.” The English reader will pronounce this to be tall 30 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope talk. In England, even amongst men of mark, niceties of speech are banned and barred. The phrase-maker is commonly a prig, the precisian in grammar is despised as a pedant. The American on the contrary, has found out that a well-sharpened tongue is more reliable than a six-shooter. But it must be noted that (regarding the tongue as a weapon) conversation in America is necessarily ag- gressive and competitive. Club talk in England is narcotic in quality, in the West it is stimulant. I have met vampire talkers, who seemed to suck from the brains of others vigour and vitality. Some im- press one painfully as struggling against odds too great to be overcome. Up to the neck in a quag- mire of words, they finally sink into silence, defeated but not disgraced. I remember meeting a friend who had been elected a state senator, and asking him how he had fared at Sacramento. “First rate,” he replied, taking hold of the lapel of my coat. “ Yes, first rate. I was really scared out of my wits, but I didn’t wilt. And I rehearsed carefully my own little song and dance. You read my maiden speech? Yes: good—eh? My boy, I practised it in front of my mirror. Yes, I did! And I gave ’em a little of everything: a dash of Mill,a teaspoonful of Spencer, Shakespeare, the Bible, and a line from the Mikado. It was great, great! It hit ’em all. I tell you—don’t give me away — that the western orator’s vade mecum, his staff, his shield, his cruse of oil, is—a Dictionary of Quotations.” Nothing upsets the equanimity of a Californian The Men of the West 31 crowd. At one of the great football games between Stanford and Berkeley Universities, a huge stand, flimsily constructed of timber, began to shake omi- nously. Several persons jumped up and a panic was imminent. Just then there arose a well- known man, something of an autocrat in his way. “Sit down!” he said sternly. “Sit Down! SIT DOWN!” He was obeyed, but a clear voice was heard in reply: “That’s all right, Fred. But why don’t you sit down yourself?” Another anecdote that illustrates well the temper of an American crowd as contrasted with an Eng- lish assembly is worth repeating: A great singer was enchanting a large audience, when suddenly at her feet a column of flame soared up into the flies. In the front row of the stalls a man sat beside his wife (some wags said she was his mother- in-law). As the flames shot upward this fellow bolted. He was next to the gangway, and was up and out of the theatre before the audience had realised what was impending. The flames van- ished ; the cantatrice smiled and assured the house that the danger was over. Then the man came back! In England he would have been greeted with hisses. In America he was cheered! For my part, I think that his moral courage in return- ing was more amazing than his cowardice in run- ning away. In a thousand ways the men of the West show that they are willing and content to accept less than their due. In lawsuits a compromise is generally possible, whereas in England the same suit would be fought to a finish. And in their 32 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope daily dealings with others, the Native Sons are humorously sensible that “the other fellow” may get the best of the bargain, and if he does none complains. A question at such a time would pro- voke a grin and the assurance that the speaker’s turn would come — later. I remember a very stout dealer in real estate who once showed me a rocky and sterile piece of land, for which he asked an exorbitant price. I was indignant. “You must,” said I, “take me for a fool of fools. How dare you show me such a scarecrow of a ranch as this! To whom does it belong?” My stout friend answered sorrowfully: “It’s mine. I was fool enough to buy it in boom times; I’ve been waiting ever since to find a bigger fool than I to take it off my hands. And,” he added sotto-voce, “I don’t know now that Ill ever find him.” Another real estate agent was showing some rough hills to a client. The day was hot, the slopes were almost perpendicular, and the client tired and out of temper. After seeing the ranch he demanded the price. It was named. “ What! You have the nerve to name a figure as steep as that for such land!” “Well,” murmured the other, blandly, “you see ~ the land is steep too.” The consideration shown to employees by the great corporations and business houses is a mani- festation of that genial, kindly spirit which is in- deed as mortar binding one human soul to another. The master seldom forgets that once he was the man, and the man never forgets that he in his turn may be the master. I cannot recall, during seventeen The Men of the West Ex} years, one single instance of a cruel and cutting rebuke from one in authority to a clerk or servant. A friend of mine had a clerk who was always for- getting important duties: letters would be left unmailed; important entries on the books would be omitted; messages, even, were sometimes not delivered. Said my friend to me one morning: “Really, I must speak to John.” So John was summoned, and I wondered what manner of rebuke would fall upon his head. “John,” said my friend, “it is most astonishing what a very bad memory you have. But Ibelieve that in time it will improve, because I notice that you have never once forgotten to draw your salary on the first of the month.” John took the hint, and after that my friend was truly and faithfully served. It has been said that corporations have no con- sciences. I can personally testify that this is, generally speaking, untrue of the banks in the West. The kindness and forbearance shown by them to their debtors have tided many and many across the quicksands of ruin. It is often, I admit, the policy of the strong not to seize the spoil, but I know of cases where bankers have preferred the interests of customers to their own, and during recent years of drought and panic, notably during the time when the Australian banks were breaking by the score, the policy pursued by the capitalists of California averted a general panic. Had they, in their hour of sore need, pressed claims upon an impoverished community, half the farmers and storekeepers in Southern California would have become bankrupt. More than one bank suspended 3 34 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope payment, but the confidence of the people in those who held their fortunes in the palm of the hand was sustained and justified. I was in California when war was declared be- tween the United States and Spain. Of that war so much has been written by so many and such able men that little remains to be said — now. Later, when the history of it is set forth calmly and dispassionately, when time has adjusted the scales by which the great events of the world are measured, it will be found that the Declaration of Independence has not been fraught with more vital interest and significance to the people of the New World than this declaration —so to speak — of Dependence: the dependence, not of the weak upon the strong, but of the strong in relation to the ignorance and folly and vice of the weak: a confession that no nation, however great, can stand alone. The particular causes that constrained Mr. McKinley to let loose the dogs of war have not yet been determined. The ugly word “revenge” was in many mouths. Political expediency, in- crease of territory, were phrases heard at the street corners and in the clubs. And, doubtless, these and half a dozen others were factors in’a sum that must have sorely puzzled the President and his Cabinet. But, personally, I believe that from Maine to California the Puritan spirit, using the adjective in its best sense, was stirring the hearts of the people. There is a feeling all over America, but more especially in the West, a feeling essentially Gallic, that leads men to pose as being worse than they The Men of the West 35 are. J remember a charming American woman saying to me, & propos of her husband: “ He is the most domestic man I know, but he would like to be thought a Jattle wild.” Now, the London “ Spec- tator” predicted war some weeks before it was declared, and it pointed out the good motives that would surely animate our cousins over-seas. The article was able, but a note of condescension lurked between the lines of it, that condescension in re- gard to foreigners of which James Lowell wrote so delightfully. American readers might infer from the “Spectator” that they were expected by Eng- land to do their duty, not as free-born Americans, but as the kinsmen of Englishmen. I do not say that the writer of the article in question deliber- ately meant this. But I assert that by Americans such interpretation was placed upon it, and upon other similar articles in the London papers. At any rate, the San Francisco “ Argonaut,” the best weekly upon the Pacific Slope, and one of the best in the world, burst into coloured sparks of rhetoric. After reading carefully an impassioned leader, I was quite satisfied (temporarily) that Duty, as an entity in American affairs, was dead, that Evil always triumphed over Good, that Might was Right, and that the finger of Destiny was the finger of Death. The article was widely read in the West, and its phrases snapped up by many an Autolycus. Men who had talked glibly enough only the week before of philanthropy, and the obli- gations of a model republic, went about the streets dancing a sort of Carmagnole. It was high time —some of them said —to grab all they could get. 36 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Why not be bold and bad, like the buccaneer- ing Briton? Let the United States annex Cuba, and Spain, and Europe, and the Aurora Bore- alis, if necessary. The reaction had set in. Then I remembered one of Max O’Rell’s best stories. Mons. Edmond About had written of a hero that he was “ virtuous as a pupil of the Polytechnique.” The pupils of the Polytechnique at once held an indignation meeting that simmered into the form of a round robin to the distinguished author. “Monsieur,” it ran, “pray mind your own busi- ness. We are no more virtuous than you are!” Max O’Rell always added that he knew this story was true, because he signed the round robin himself ! But be the causes of the war what they please, the spirit in which the youth of America responded to the call of arms must awaken the liveliest admiration in all of us. If Mr. McKinley had asked for a million men, he would have had them within twenty-four hours. Friends of mine, men with many interests at stake, volunteered to serve in the ranks. A private’s musket might have been a marshal’s baton, judging by the eagerness with which it was sought. One patriot—to cite ~ a single instance out of a thousand —no longer young, very rich, occupying a high position in society, a man of fashion and culture, wired to Washington entreating his friends there to procure him any position, however humble, in either the army or navy. It is said that his wife wired also: “Pay no attention to Jimmy.” No attention was paid to Jimmy, except perhaps by the Recording The Men of the West 27 Angel; but his fervent wish to serve his country, abandoning thereby all that most of us count as making life worth living, has curious significance to a foreigner. There are about a million Jim- mies in the United States. In the West the war was taken very soberly. In the clubs, in the restaurants and cafés, at the theatres and music halls, there was none of that cheap and vicious excitement that in its worst phases is delirium. The regiments marched into San Francisco, they sailed through the Golden Gates, and always the streets and docks were black with friends to wish them “God speed you.” An observer could not fail to be profoundly im- pressed by these comings and goings. Between them and the mimic parades of the National Guards upon high days and holidays, was the difference between the real thing and the sham. The faces of the fathers were grim as they watched their sons file past (they were thinking of Gettysburg and Vicksburg), and the women’s cheeks were wet. The word “ Chauvinism” has been used more than once of late in connection with the people of the West,—a word to which a deserved stigma is attached. But, for my part, the militarism of the people was a pleasant thing to witness. Rich and poor alike joined hands in singing the national anthem, and the fact that it is set to the music of “God Save the Queen” did not detract from its power and purport so far as I was concerned. Columbia called her sons to arms, — ** And all the bugle breezes blew Réveillé to the breaking morn.” 38 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope The Stars and Stripes floated from the top of every house. Upon hundreds of thousands of windows were pasted paper flags. The girls encircled their hats and waists with ribbons of red, white, and blue. The boys bought badges and buttons. The men wore tiny enamelled scarf-pins. Some Eng- lishmen took exception to this perfervid patriotism. They said that love of country was cheapened when a man wore it in his cravat instead of in his heart. In England, continued these critics, the flag was held too sacred to be defamed to calico uses.1 I can quite sympathise with this point of view, but I can also sympathise with and apprehend the spirit of a new country which exacts, and exults in,a demonstration. And a demonstration is neces- sary, —the confession of faith of a heterogeneous people. Englishmen can well take the patriotism of their fellow-countrymen for granted; they are and have been Englishmen for nearly a thousand years. But in the West is it not common prudence to demand from the Kelt, the Teuton, the Latin, the Slav, an answer to the question, “ Are you truly of us, or merely with us?” Fifty years hence the Stars and Stripes will be still the beloved flag, but it will not be seen twisted around the hats of the maidens, or pasted in paper upon the windows. The men of the West may be divided into three classes: those who live by the seaboard, those who live on the plains, and the stockmen and miners who dwell in the mountains. 1 Since these lines were written the author has witnessed the scenes in London after Ladysmith and Mafeking were relieved. The Men of the West 39 It has been my unhappy experience that most of those who live by the seaboard are — tricky, as were, doubtless, the traders of Tyre and Sidon. And there is small excuse for their trickiness inasmuch as to them, the citizens of a great republic, have been given advantages denied to the strivers in less favoured countries. All these knaves know the right, yet they choose the wrong. In the old world you find the seller putting the biggest straw- berries on the top of the pottle, his smallest pota- toes in the bottom of the sack, water into the milk, sand into the sugar, and so forth. In the West, where neither poverty, nor vice, nor disease, nor ignorance can be pleaded in excuse, these tricks assume a darker complexion. It is true that the worst offenders come from the East and from Europe, for the West is a sanctuary to the pariahs of the nations. Here, mind-healers, clairvoyants, astrologers, card-sharpers and the like, flourish as the bay tree. These are the dregs of the © older civilisations, the scum of the new, and there- fore the more readily seen. Perhaps, if choice must be made of two evils, it is better that sewage should be spread upon the fields than lie festering in cel- lars. The bad that has come to and is in the West lies upon the surface of all things, in full view of a too hypercritical world. If this scum be not soon skimmed and cast to the void it will filter through every stratum of society, as it has done elsewhere, and then the last state of the West, outwardly im- maculate, will prove worse than the first. I believe, personally, that the period of purification has begun. There is said to be honour amongst thieves. 40 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Western thieves are exceptions to this rule. I re- member subscribing toward the construction of a steam schooner that was to carry at a minimum. rate the produce of our county. to San Francisco. Many farmers pledged themselves to ship their wheat and wool by this vessel. The railroad, a local road, was run upon the well-known principle of charging the shipper “all that the tariff would bear,” a policy which enriched the shareholders of the road, but did not endear them to the farmers of our county. It was pointed out that as soon as the steamer was put in commission, the railroad rates would be cut in a competition that must prove disas- trous to the fortunes of the steamer, unless the farmers loyally observed their contract. It was also pointed out that if the farmers failed to support the steamer, it would be sold, and that the railroad would have our county at its mercy. Were they loyal? Had they the wit to avail themselves of an opportunity ? No. The railroad did cut their rates. The poor little steamer was wiped from the seas. And then, when it was too late, the penny-wise farmers paid in full for their folly and dishonesty. Of the men who live in the plain, the less said the better. The sun seems to have sucked the sap from them, leaving them, as it leaves the grass in the pastures, drab-coloured and withered. Here are the wheat farmers of the Pacific Slope, who hold the prosperity of the inland towns at the mercy of the elements. If the sun shines too fiercely, if the wind blows too hard, if the rain fails, if blight, or rust, or wire worms attack the crops, the com- munity trembles. The banker, the storekeeper, the The Men of the West 4I lawyer, the doctor, and the parson may well join in the farmer’s prayers for rain. To all, a drought spells ruin. These big gamblers are the curse of a new country. They have done enormous harm to the State of California. They impoverished the soil that yielded at first fabulous harvests, and they impover- ished the souls of those dependent upon their success and failure. Credit is the life blood of a new country; it irrigates the waste places of the earth. Without it the greater portion of the West would be to-day what it was in the time of Daniel Webster — a wilder- ness, But credit, like water, can do grievous harm. Credit, in full flood, has swept from the West those habits of thrift and industry and patience that alone make for character and prosperity in a community, as in an individual. They will return, they are now returning, halting in the wake of adversity, and under more generous conditions will become vertebrate and vigorous. In the old days, it will be remembered, Lot chose the plain, and to Abraham was given the hill. And since those ancient times, it has always seemed to me that the best men live nearest the stars. Cer- tainly in the West you will find that the mountain- eers are a finer race, more robust than their brethren of the plain, simpler in their habits, breathing a purer air and leading a purer life. For the most part they are miners or cattlemen. If you meet one of these fellows, be sure and mark the quality of his glance. George Eliot’s much criticised adjec- tive “ dynamic ” describes it best, — that all-compel- ling gaze, the glance of a man whose eyes are weapons not of offence, but of defence. In the foot- 42 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope hills, in the forests, and in the plateaux of the Sierras, you will find these men. They are a silent race, save when possessed of strong drink, sober of coun- tenance, impassive (some of them) as Redskins, very prejudiced, but as a rule honourable, kind- hearted and truthful. Like the ancient Persians, they can ride, shoot, and speak truth. They are loyal to their friends. Some years ago two outlaws set the officers of justice at defiance. They lived on the plain, but in their hour of need betook themselves to their friends in the mountains. Here they found sanctuary and food and drink. A great price was set on their heads, but for many months they remained at large. Shooting and fishing among these people, I have always found them hospitable and honest. Often they have refused money for my board and lodging. Not once can I recall an overcharge for services rendered. Talking with them around the camp- fire, I have been told amazing stories of obstacles surmounted, stories of almost superhuman pluck and endurance. Of the life beyond their forests and mountains they are profoundly ignorant. An English Minister of Education, Sir John Gorst, has said that he considers “ reading, writing, and arith- - metic to be of dubious value to a boy who lives in the country; and grammar a positive curse.” The men who live nearest the stars are learned in other lore, the ancient wisdom of the woods and streams, where every leaf and pebble tells its tale to the at- tentive eye and ear. They are still masters of the arts that an educated world has forgotten. Perhaps contrast colours too vividly the imagination, and The Men of the West 43 warps our sense of proportion. But, in the cool northern woods in springtime, when the forest ap- peals in turn to all the senses, lying, may be, on the banks of a lovely stream, watching the rainbow trout, the big fellows at ease in the tail of a rapid, seeing, perhaps, a stag quenching his thirst, hearing the melodious murmur of the stream, the soft sigh of the cedars kissing overhead, smelling the per- fume of the pines, I have wondered if this, the life of the primal man, is not, after all, the best that can be lived under God’s high heaven. At any rate, as an antidote to the fever of modern life it has no peer. O weary worker of the West, see to it that for a season in each year you live out-of-doors! Sleep beneath the stars. Eat the food that the woods and streams provide. Fill your lungs with ozone and oxygen, fill your body with plain, whole- some food, fill your heart with the freshness and fragrance of the forest, your soul with the glory of the firmament; and then, when you return to the roaring thoroughfares of the world, you will realise that, no matter how dun the days of strife may be, you too have had your golden hours — of rest. I have spoken hitherto of men generally, but the West produces certain giants, who by virtue of their size challenge special attention. These are the aristocrats, the few, who at all times and in all places mould and control the many. I shall name two. Mr. Collis Huntington was the President of the Southern Pacific Company, the richest man in California, the ablest financier in the United States, and one of the shrewdest politicians of this or any 44 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope other age. He has been compared to Bismarck, to Napoleon, to Gladstone. He had enormous execu- tive ability, stupendous capacity for work, a great sane mind in a great sane body. I have had the pleasure of chatting with him, and I recall without effort his leonine head, his keen, kindly eyes, his massive body, and the power and vigour that ema- nated from it. Mr. Huntington could stand upon the ragged edge of an abyss, and gaze undaunted into frightful depths. There is said to be a line between right and wrong. Mr. Huntington ploughed close to the line, where the soil is richest; some say that he went beyond it. That line, most of us will admit, is a meridian, variable and varying. Per- haps when Mr. Huntington’s figures are given to the public, it will be agreed that his line has been, after all, nicely computed. To most of us this same line is a broad strip of debatable land upon which we wander, poor vagabonds, asking of each other where we are. To Mr. Huntington must at least be given the credit of always knowing exactly where he was. More, he showed others where and what they were. He plucked the eagle’s feathers from many a daw; he stripped many an ass of his lion’s skin. An octogenarian, he worked as hard as any youth. Born in a small Eastern vil- lage, he was essentially of the West. His life was simple, primal even. By the sweat of brow and brain he made himself—a Colossus. And you can- not measure him with the foot-rule of pygmies. Of Mr. Huntington scores of stories are told, One, pregnant with significance, is repeated from Shasta to San Diego. The driver of a cab, recog- The Men of the West 45 nising the great man, protested that he had been paid no more than his legal fare. “Your nephew,” said the fellow, “pays me three times as much.” “Ts that so?” replied Mr. Huntington. “ Well, you see, my friend, I have not a rich uncle —as he has.” What Mr. Huntington has been to the material growth of the Pacific Slope, Doctor Jordan, of the Leland Stanford Junior University, has been to the more subtle development of the world unseen. His influence to-day amongst the young men of the West cannot be measured till to-morrow. In a country where gold colours the very flowers of the field, Doctor Jordan, like Agassiz, has had no time to make money. He has refused preferment again and again, cut down his salary, when the university was in financial straits, laboured strenu- ously in many fields without the labourer’s wage, and, in fine, has set an example of energy and fortitude that thousands are striving to emulate. But David Starr Jordan’s friends — and their name is legion —say that he does too much. He is a world-famous ichthyologist, an international author- ity upon natural science, a writer of note, a poet, a lecturer, a journalist: the Charles Kingsley of the New World. Is it not to be feared that this Protean capacity of playing a dozen parts will work evil rather than good? The weakness and the strength of the West lurk in its varied resources. A child taken to a toy-shop squanders his dollar upon a dozen trifles because the sense of selection is paralysed. Likewise the young man, apprehend- ing, through the clear lenses of a Jordan, the infi- 46 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope nite possibilities of the future, the alluring wares that Nature has spread upon a thousand counters, may wander here and there, frittering away his capital of energy upon a score of gewgaws, whereas he might have bought and paid for a radiant pearl. Some of my readers must have seen that amaz- ing Italian, Fregoli THe plays by himself a comed- ietta, in which he alone assumes the various réles. He is ubiquitous. Here, a dotard —there, a bal- lerina. There are many Fregolis in the West. I used to know one who was in turn doctor, parson, undertaker, justice of the peace, paper-hanger, and painter. He played all these parts indifferently well; he was intelligent, temperate, hard-working —and he never had been able to earn more than a bare living. Il THE WOMEN OF THE WEST ra is (Seta ah, Dau, IIl THE WOMEN OF THE WEST I REMEMBER a pretty Californienne with whom I used to dance, a true daughter of the West, charming on account of her beauty, vivacity, health, and youth. She had never left the Pacific Slope — except on the wings of a perfervid imagination — and she afforded an amazing contrast to other young women of my acquaintance, the gilded girlies who had had what is humorously called advantages, —a season in London, a winter in Riviera, a summer at New- port, and so forth. Perhaps I had better say at once that in speaking of the men and women and children of the Pacific Slope, I do not include the Anglo-Franco-Americans, who have built around themselves a stone wall that I, being an English- man, am willing to respect. Our pretty Californienne dines in the middle of the day and sups at six. Thesame girl, in England, would be painfully ill at ease in the presence of a stranger. Moreover, you would note regretfully that the English girl’s skirt was ill hung, that her hair was somewhat tousled, that her shoes were vilely cut. The Californienne, on the contrary, challenges criticism out of a pair of sparkling eyes. “Take a square look at me,’ she seems to say; ‘it will brace you up.” Should you accept this invita- tion in sober earnest, defiance will curve her lips 4 50 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope into a smile. The odds are she will put you to the blush with the sharp question, “Anything wrong ?” The first time that I had the honour of a valse with this young lady, I committed a breach of eti- quette. She danced admirably. I—vwell, no man is bound to incriminate himself —I did my best. But, after circling twice round the room (the night was sultry), I stopped and began to talk. She seemed provoked at something, answered in mono- syllables, and when I said, “Shall we go on danc- ing?” replied curtly, “ That’s what we ’re here for.” After a couple of turns I stopped again, and then my lady Disdain, out of the fulness of her heart, spoke : — “Tt’s not hard to tell that you’re an Englishman.” “Thank you,” said I. ‘‘ My dancing betrays me.” “Yes, it does. No, no, I don’t mean that. You dance fairly well, but —” For a couple of minutes she wouldnot budge from her “but.” Finally, she was constrained to entire frankness. Why had I stopped twice without con- sulting her convenience? JI was so paralysed with amazement that I had no answer pat, save the ob- vious one. I had stopped — so I said — because, in | my opinion, it was better to stop than to fall down. “Giddy ?” she demanded incredulously. “Yes; giddy.” “ American men never get giddy,” she observed, after a significant pause. “Tf they did,” I submitted, “would they stop without consulting their partner ?” “They would go till they dropped,” she retorted. The Women of the West si Did she mean it literally? Perhaps not. But truth underlies these idle words. The Western man ws expected to “go till he drops;” and the Western woman sets the pace. Are women judges of pace ? You may roughly divide the daughters of the West into two great classes: the bond and the free ; those who have leisure and those who have none. The woman of leisure is a charming creature ; clever, plastic, cheery, and always womanly (the English girl who hunts, shoots, swears, and gambles has no understudies on the Pacific Slope); but, be she maid, wife, or widow, she obeys no law save that of her own sweet will. There are many exceptions, of course, but the Western woman of leisure, in startling contrast to other women, does what she likes rather than what she ought; although often duty and inclination march hand in hand? If a daughter of the West sits up with the sick child of a neighbour, the chorus says, “How good of her!” The chorus does not say, “How good for her.” She is unconsciously the most selfish creature of her sex. To find her mate, you must go to England and take the gilded youth who fondly thinks that the world owes him a living. He has had, as a rule, an expensive and superficial education, he can talk glibly enough about most things on this earth, particularly his neighbours, and his neighbour’s wife. He has a feminine love of being “ done well.” He will join a great house-party and leave it with- out saying good-bye or thank-you to his hostess. He will invite his pals to drink his father’s vintage 52 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope champagnes and to shoot his father’s coverts ; and when the author of his being writes a fatherly letter complaining that his son’s extravagance will force him (the sire) to let his town house and spend the season out of town, the son sends a postcard in reply, expressing his regret and offering to rent the house in question himself! Once and again a youth such as I have described (from life) marries a daughter of the Golden West; and then Greek meets Greek. One girl I knew married a man who died under peculiarly tragic circumstances. Everybody con- doled with her, and perhaps she grew tired of cheap verbiage. At any rate she silenced sympathy one day by saying, in the most naive manner: “ Yes, it was dreadful, dreadful; but, thinking it all over, I would sooner it was him than me!” It is not uncommon to read in the society notes of a San Francisco paper that Miss X is enter- taining a party of her friends at her country place. The country place belongs to her father the bread- winner, but he is seldom seen and as seldom heard. The English father of daughters, loud-voiced, didac- tic, prone to fits of “ waxiness,” the laughing-stock of many, and the terror of the few unhappy women over whom he rules, is unknown on the Pacific Slope. Ifa Californian father ventured to find fault with a daughter, he would be sent, metaphorically speaking, to bed. For a week he would be given to understand that he was in disgrace. He would have to take his meals —as it were —at the side- table. 3 The women I am describing improve their minds at the expense of their souls. Culture, which — The Women of the West Lg according to Matthew Arnold — is only one-fourth of life, teaches them nothing about the vital three- fourths — conduct. The men are busy making money —they have no time to do anything else; but the wives and daughters are taking French and German lessons, studying Spencer, or Maeterlinck, or Mrs. Mary Eddy, devouring, with an appetite which grows by what it feeds on, the contents of every new book, good or bad, — in a word, eternally busy in widening and deepening the intellectual eulf between the men and themselves. The men are responsible for this state of affairs. Indeed they brag of it. They are willing to die that their beloved may live. The hotels (and the divorce courts) are full of idle wives. Why? Because housekeeping in a new country is a syno- nym of work. Many a good fellow has said to me, “ My wife, sir, shall not work, so long as I can work for her.” None of these butterflies are happy. Mark the quality of their laughter. Note the tinkle of raillery. The educated daughter of the West would sooner laugh at you than with you. This one-sided condition of things cannot be dismissed with a phrase. In all new countries, there is a time when woman is compelled to bear dreadful burdens. Look at the pioneers, — the men who advanced step by step into the wilder- ness, performing prodigies of labour, hewing down vast forests, reclaiming hideous swamps, irrigating the barren places, for ever working and fighting, the prey of wild beasts and wild men, the heroes, who, despite all obstacles, perhaps because of them, 54 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope triumphantly vindicated their unparalleled patience and energy,— these were accompanied by their wives, the mothers and grandmothers of the daughters of the West. Stop and think what these women, some of them delicately nurtured, suffered and endured. Think not only of the physical ills, but of the mental worries and anxie- ties: the sense of isolation, the impending sword of death and disease, the possibility of what is worse than death, —torture and dishonour. Ts it then to be wondered at that when a brighter day dawned for these men they realised what was owing to their wives? And have they not be- queathed the sense of this obligation to their sons ? Can you not hear them saying, “Nothing that this world can give is too good for the women of the West” ? And accordingly she has been exalted, and the hands that placed the idol on high are loath to pull it down. Indeed, so beloved are their women by the men of the West that some of them (a few), who are truly no more than graven images, have been given articulate speech. I know one man, a charming fellow, witty and humorous and the husband of a stupid wife. Again and again he has told me what his wife has said upon subjects whose very names, I am convinced, are Greek to her. I have never failed on such occasions to express my sense of his wife’s wit, and upon my soul I am beginning to believe that my Pygmalion really gives his Galatea credit for the good things which he puts into her mouth. Such a husband brings no business cares to his shrine. Often the divinity The Women of the West 55 is the last to learn that the worshipper who has decked her with diamonds is on the eve of bank- ruptcy. But let it never be forgotten that when adversity comes the idol steps quickly down from her pedestal. The shrine is dismantled. The divinity enters the kitchen. And you can wager that she soon learns how to cook an excellent dinner. Again, in early days the men were many, the women were few, and, as a commodity in the marriage mart, of extravagant value. It is unfair to say that they went to the highest bidder, for Western girls are not mercenary in the sense that applies to the daughters of Mayfair, but naturally they fell into the arms of the rich rather than the poor. Indeed, a poor man, unable to give his wife the luxuries of life, remained at the mines or on the plains —a bachelor. Another reason: the last. At a time when vast fortunes were made and lost in a few weeks or months, it was part of the general scheme of things to make hay while the sun of prosperity was shin- ing. The man who had sold a big herd of fat steers, who had struck a rich lead at the mines, who held booming stocks, was not one to grudge his wife a few diamonds or an extra dress or two. Freely they had received, as freely they gave. And so, petted and pampered, with not a caprice left unsatisfied, the women of the West, touched to the finest issues by poverty and hardship, were by prosperity debased and discoloured. Not long ago a friend of mine met a charming woman on one of the big Atlantic liners. She confided to him 56 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope her plans for her honeymoon. Nothing was want- ing, seemingly, but a husband. He—it appeared —had been left behind in San Francisco. Let us turn now to the women who earn their own living: the type-writers, the stenographers, the book-keepers, the telegraph and telephone girls, the doctors, and insurance agents. The fact that a girl can and does earn a fair living gives her a sense of independence and a self-possession quite admirable. But often, avoiding the Scylla of ineptitude, she is engulfed in the Charybdis of a too strenuous endeavour. She is pushing behind a coach that already is over-horsed. Whatever she may accom- plish to-day, to-morrow must hold for her sickness and disappointment, — the protest of the body femi- nine against uses to which it is ill-adapted, the protest of the mind whose desires have outgrown performance. There is a loss— who can deny it? —of womanliness. Does this loss to a community outweigh the gain ? Some years ago I walked into my office, and found at my desk, in my chair, reading my paper, an insurance agent. She was tall, well-dressed, and had the impudence and insolence of her tribe. With these weapons she had fought her way past my clerk, and through a door marked “ Private.” When she saw me she smiled and nodded. “T’m making myself to home,” she said blandly. “So I see,” was my reply. “Won’t you be seated ?” “You are very kind.” I sat down and waited. The Women of the West 57 “Do you carry life insurance?” she asked. “T do, madam.” “In what companies, sir?” “Upon my honour, madam, I do not see how that concerns you.” She explained that she represented a new com- pany, that an exchange would benefit both of us, and so on and so forth. After five minutes of this I said quietly, — “T am sure that your time is money to you, so I tell you frankly that I have gone into the subject of insurance, that I belong to an old-line company, and that nothing you can say will make me leave it. And so I wish you — Good-morning.” The hint was wasted. For another ten minutes her tongue wagged faster that a terrier’s tail. By this time I had almost forgotten her sex. “Madam,” said I, “I made a mistake Just now. I perceive that your time is not worth much, not as much as — mine, for instance. I wish you again — Good-morning.” I rose, and held open the door. She rose also, somewhat after the fashion of the immortal Sairey Gamp. “You are an Englishman,” she said, and there was not sugar enough left in her voice to sweeten a fairy’s cup of tea. oP am: “Yes, you are. And let me tell you, sir, that you are the rudest Englishman I have ever met. Good-morning, sir.” I did not grudge her the last word. A well-known Californian tells another story. 58 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope He was standing in some public office, chatting with other men, when a brazen-faced lady sailed into the room, note-book in hand, interrogation on her brow. She was, it seemed, the moving pillar of flame of some organisation that had concerned itself, amongst many matters, with female suffrage. This Gorgon approached a man, and addressed him, — “ Are you in favour of woman’s suffrage, sir?” “Most emphatically I am not,” he replied. “You are not. Your name, sir,—and your address ?” The man stammered out both name and ad- dress. The lady marched on, asking each the same questions. None refused their names or ad- dresses. Finally, she tackled a stout farmer. “ Are you in favour of woman’s suffrage, sir?” “T am not,” he replied. “Indeed, I think there are fools enough in pants voting already.” “Sir-r-r-r!!! Your name, your address ?” The stout farmer eyed her calmly. The other men waited a-quiver with expectation. The stout farmer conveyed somehow the impression that he would stand his ground, and vindicate the superi- ority of the male. “That is none of your d very deliberately. The Gorgon stared into his impassive face. Then she turned and confronted the others. Nobody smiled or frowned. But the sense of the meeting had been adequately set forth by the stout farmer. The lady fled. There are many such women in the West, and d business,” said he, The Women of the West 59 they make the lives of their “men folks,” as they are pleased to call them, abjectly miserable. The following anecdote, not a new one to Western read- ers, illustrates the man’s point of view. A long- suffering husband was burying his wife. The coffin had been taken from the hearse by the pall-bearers, and was being carried through the somewhat nar- row gate of the cemetery. It chanced that in passing through the gate, the coffin was thrust hard against one of the posts. Almost immedi- ately, to the amazement of the mourners, a muffled scream was heard. The lid was hastily unscrewed. And, lo! the woman was not dead at all. She was taken home and lived for three more years. Then she died again. At the funeral, as the coffin was being lowered from the hearse, the husband addressed the bearers very solemnly: “Boys — mind that post.” We come now to the Western woman who leads the double life,— the life of the peasant and the gentlewoman. There are hundreds of these be- tween San Diego and Victoria, nay, thousands, who, as a factor in the future of the Pacific Slope, challenge attention —and pity. Personally I can conceive nothing more pathetic, more heart-break- ing, than the spectacle of a gently nurtured girl constrained by poverty to bake and wash and sweep, to play the parts of cook, nurse, wife, ser- vant, and washerwoman, and yet, by virtue of what is bred in her, constrained also to dress as a lady dresses, to eat what a lady eats, to read what a lady reads. Here, again, the curse of a new coun- try, the insatiable desire to appear other than what 60 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope | you are and ought to be, grinds these unhappy women to powder. They wish—they will tell you—to keep up with the procession! Where is the American sense of humour? The men know that the double life cannot be lived. Accordingly, they give their undivided attention to business. When success crowns his labours, the Westerner can —and often does —apply himself diligently to art, or letters, or politics, and the powers of con- centration that made him a man of money serve also to make him a man of culture; but what chance has the woman who wishes to make soup and poetry in the same place and at the same time? She is sure to forget to put salt into either. It is easier to bale out an ocean with a pitchfork than to live successfully the double life. Think of Browning and —basting, of a crying baby and French irregular verbs, of kitchen odours and Herbert Spencer. The end is inevitable. These women die, worn out. Before their first boy is breeched the colour and form and fragrance of life have fled. And they leave to their children — what? A taint, in a sense, as of scrofula, the stigmata of the suffering and sorrow that wait on failure. These children in their turn will try to shave Shagpat. Their mother, in the attempt to do two things at once, has given them indigestible food for mind and body. Upon the graves of these unhappy women should be inscribed the famous French line: “Malheureuse est ]’ignorance, et plus malheureux le savoir.” A feature of home life in the West to which — | so far as | know —no writer has drawn attention, The Women of the West 61 is the gradual backsliding of maternal love and tenderness as the child grows older. This is so in- sidious as to escape the notice of most persons — particularly the parents; but amongst nearly all classes in the West— as in the upper and upper- middle class of England —there is an animal love of the very young, a wish to cuddle, and kiss, and flatter, and dress, and spoil the little ones, a love which diminishes as imperceptibly, but as surely, as the adored object increases. And the men like to see it. They take the mother at her own valuation. She tells them that she loves babies, that she is so fond of children; and they believe it! These women always sigh because their children are growing up. The child is, or ought to be, develop- ing, maturing, becoming in short a human being, ceasing to be a kitten or a puppy; and this — say the mothers —is cause for regret. And as a rule, it as cause for regret. The child is growing up to be vain, hard, selfish, deformed in mind, perhaps in body — essentially unlovable. Some wit said that the spinsters of England were the mothers of Eng- lish gentlemen. He was alluding to the nurses, the governesses, the maiden aunts, the plain elder sisters, who do not perhaps kiss and cuddle, but who patiently and laboriously, day after day, month after month, year after year, shape and prune and water the tender plants committed to their charge. And these are the women whom the men of the world hold cheap! I never meet a mother but I wonder whether her children are denied, not kisses, but that love which finds expression in ceaseless ministration to the mental and moral faculties. I 62 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope know one mother — it is a privilege to know her — who is in and of the West. She has no servants, no sister, not even a friend to help her care for her three children. Does she hug her little ones in pub- lic? Not she. But she gives them hours of patient teaching and gentle correction. And when her chil- dren grow up she will have her reward. There are many such in the West, but there might be so many more. And, mark you, the “ani- mal” mother, beneath the veneer of tenderness is hard — hard as the nether millstone; and her hard- ness grinds to powder the gawky hobbledehoys and — hoydens who are not a credit to her whom they have the misfortune of calling — mother! Some of my readers will remember a paragraph of Daudet’s in that delightful book Fromont Jeune et Risler Ainé. It is so pat that I cannot forbear quoting it: a translation would spoil it. “Ce que Sidonie enviait par-dessus tout a Claire, c’était l’enfant, le poupou luxueux, enrubanné de- puis les rideaux de son berceau jusqu’au bonnet de sa nourrice. Elle ne songeait pas aux devoirs doux, pleins de patience et d’abnégation, aux longs berce- ments des sommeils difficiles, aux réveils rieurs, étincelants d’eau fraiche. Non! dans l’enfant, elle ne voyait que la promenade. . . .” The women of the Pacific Slope have indirect control of the churches and schools. We are told that “the hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world,” but in the West it not infre- quently happens that in attempting to rule the world, the cradle is allowed to stand still. Work is The Women of the West 63 done in churches and schools that might be better done at home. It would seem as if the women of the West, living in a country where everything is on a large scale, were absolutely unable to see what is small. With their eyes fixed on the mountains they ignore the molehills. The men will tell you, with a fine disregard of ancient wisdom, that if you take care of the dollars, the cents will take care of themselves. Such matters are ordered better in France. There the men make the francs, and the women save the centimes. But in the West the dollars made by the men are squandered by the women. And the children buy candy with the cents. Perhaps the word “‘squander” is ill-chosen. The Western woman is keen to get what she calls “ value received” for her money. She will spend a morning as lightly as a dollar, looking over samples at a dry- goods store. Generally speaking, she buys some- thing unsuited to her station in life and her husband’s monthly income. You see more trash upon the counters of Western shops than anywhere else in the world: cheap shoes, cheap clothes, cheap jew- elry, cheap underwear. What is plain and service- able finds no favour and no sale. Some of the men and women who think about these things have said to me that what is wanted is an example: a Roosevelt in petticoats, who will preach and practise the gospel of simplicity and thrift. One cannot help feeling that such work — now that the war is over —might be undertaken by the Red Cross Society. Comfort is one of the most alluring words in the English language, but in 64 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope the West it is found for the most part only in dic- tionaries. It is conspicuously sacrificed to show in the palaces of the very rich, and it has never en- tered the cottages of the poor. You may find it in the homes of what would be called in England the middle class, especially amongst the Jews, but even here it is jostled and pinched by its bastard brother Display. The women of the West are very hospi- table, but at their luncheons and dinners you are sensible that too much is attempted. A lady with one servant entertains upon the same scale as her neighbour who has four. Many of the dishes she has prepared herself; and in consequence she comes to table a physical wreck, unable to eat, unable to talk. In such houses a famine follows the feast; after the guests have departed the mistress takes to her bed. Speaking of examples, it is a pleasure to cite Mrs. Pheebe Hearst and Mrs. Jane Stanford. These ladies own and control many millions of dollars. They are the widows of two senators who began life poor and obscure men. Senator Stanford was one of four who conceived and carried to a successful issue the building of that colossal railroad which linked the West to the East. Senator Hearst was © a famous miner. The bulk of their fortunes will eventually be absorbed by the two Universities of California. One can conceive no nobler use for great wealth than this: the endowment and equip- ment upon the most munificent scale of institutions whose doors stand open to all who are worthy to enter them. To this single end Mrs. Stanford has devoted her fortune and her life. It is a fact that The Women of the West 65 when the Leland Stanford Junior University was in sore financial straits, she denied herself no sacrifice, living in poverty and seclusion until the dun days were past. More, at an age when most women count themselves entitled to rest in peace, she mastered those difficult arts by which alone great trusts are properly administered. She became a woman of business, the slave of innumerable interests, shifting responsibilities to none, the patient indefatigable worker and executrix. The same may be said of Mrs. Hearst. To women such as these, the Pacific Slope owes an incalculable debt. The money, vast sum that it is, which they give is the least part of that debt. The sleepless nights, the anxious days, the physical exhaustion — can these be computed ? The girls of the West marry for love. Very often the daughter of a rich man, accustomed to every luxury, marries a poor clerk, or a struggling lawyer or doctor; and while the struggles last she almost invariably proves a loyal and tender helpmeet. Adversity would seem to link such lovers with golden fetters; prosperity tears them apart. It is curious to note that the rich father rarely makes his daughter an allowance, no matter how sharply poverty pinches her. There may be virtue in this Spartan discipline (I believe there is more than we suspect), but to English eyes it appears un- necessarily rigorous. There is a true story of a millionaire who gave his daughter a very large fortune when she came of age. Later, she married against his wishes a poor man, and the father said 5 66 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope bitterly that if he had been vouchsafed a glimpse of the future, his daughter would have gone penni- less to the man of her choice. The daughter, with her husband’s consent, in accordance, perhaps, with his wishes, returned her fortune to the father — and he accepted it. The women of the West have undertaken one colossal labour. They have not sprinkled the demon Drink with their tears; they have fought him tooth and nail. For many years it seemed to me that the advocates of Temperance, a synonym in the West for Total Abstinence, were far too radical in their proposed reforms. Myself a mod- erate drinker, believing then (as I believe now) that a glass of wine with one’s dinner is far more wholesome than a cup of strong tea or coffee, and infinitely less injurious than the lime-saturated water of the Pacific Slope, I could find no words strong enough to condemn those who, styling them- selves temperate, proved in debate to be the exact opposite. Since then I have learned to look at the matter from the woman’s point of view. I must admit, very reluctantly, that nothing short of the knife will cut out this cancer. I hold no brief for the W.C.T.U., I pronounce Prohibition a sorry _ plank in any political platform, but I do believe that working amongst individuals, fathers, hus- bands, and brothers, the women are justified in demanding total abstinence; they are not likely to obtain it. It seems almost impossible for the average man of the West to confine himself to a pint of light claret a day. The experiment has been tried again and again; it has always failed. The Women of the West 67 And in the past seventeen years I have seen so many seemingly sound apples drop rotten from the tree — gin-sodden and worthless. In England drunkenness is confined to a certain class; the drunkards of the West are ubiquitous. You find them everywhere — except, be it said, in the pulpit. The doctors, the lawyers, the business men are the worst offenders, for they nip, nip, nip, all day long, till they become — as they are called — whisky-tanks, and cease, for the practical purposes of life, to be men at all. What has been done to check the growth of this monstrous tumour has been done by the women, and to them be the credit. There are some public positions which women fill with genuine dignity. At the outbreak of the late war, a Red Cross Society was organised in San Francisco (I think), with branches all over the Pacific Slope. The Society concerned itself with the welfare of the American soldier, and in particu- lar the American volunteer, for whose comfort those in authority had made inadequate provision. One regiment arrived in San Francisco to find itself with- out rations. It is true that a banquet was prepared for the officers at the Palace Hotel, but the men would have gone without food for twenty-four hours had it not been for the Red Cross Society. It was a flagrant case of Red Tape versus Red Cross, and the Red Cross was not found wanting. I have found in country-bred girls an air, a grace, a charm quite irresistible. And you cannot classify them collectively. The typical Western girl does not exist. Each is unique, a study in white, or red, 68 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope or blue, or yellow (primary colours, mark you) ; each appeals to the curiosity, not to mention the cupidity, of the male ; each, too, has a chameleon-like facility of adapting herself to her environment without sac- rificing an iota of her personality. Many English- men waste valuable time in making up what they call their minds upon purely domestic matters. In the West, the daughters generously assume this task. Without the circle of politics and business, the young American man follows wherever his sis- ter, or some other man’s sister, may lead. About this spinster, moreover, are no skirts of compromise: those clogging garments which cramp and compress the walk, the talk, the very thoughts of the English miss. Perhaps the common denominator of the young women of the West is a magnificent charlatanerie ; an imposture that would be ridiculous if it were not sublime. Each pretends to be what she is not; each thinks herself the superior of the women in the classes below hers, the equal of those in the classes above; each strives to appear cleverer, younger, wittier, and prettier than God intended her to be. Indeed, it is an impertinence to speak of them as women ; they are all —ladies. And all are ambitious. The ambition of the wife spurs the husband to efforts beyond his strength. Living as they do in the country of infinite possibilities, the humblest unconsciously try to fit themselves for positions that but few are destined to occupy. I re- member, many years ago, being accosted by a tramp, who asked me for money wherewith to buy “a bite of something to eat.” I gave him a small coin, re- The Women of the West 69 marking that in my opinion he was likely to spend it on “a bite of something to drink.” As he moved away, ragged and forlorn, my father-in-law, who was with me, said soberly: “You should not cut jokes with free-born American citizens, That fel- low may live to be senator of this State.” The balance must be adjusted between the woman who does not work at all and the woman who works too hard. I am of opinion that a radical change is taking place in the hearts and heads of the women themselves. I have already said that adversity brings out and develops what is best in the Western woman. The hard times have given them a clearer perception of values, a saner common sense, En- vironment is more potent than heredity. The New England women, for instance, bring with them to the West the qualities that distinguish them, —a love of truth and duty and renunciation; and as a rule these good gifts abide with them till they die. But their daughters born in the West will be of the West; and as the West changes, sloughing its skin, so will they change, in obedience to the laws of evolution, till they stand at length, strong and tri- umphant upon the pyramid of experience, not what they are to-day, but what they ought to be— to-morrow. IV THE CHILDREN OF THE WEST isn ‘ IV THE CHILDREN OF THE WEST T has been said that the pioneers were the salt of the earth, but their children have been reared for the most part as if they were sugar. A man who has practised rigid self-denial, who knows —none better —what he has lost, as well as what he has gained, and who, perhaps, lacking a perfect sense of proportion, is apt to overestimate the value of advantages he has been forced to forego, —an academic education, for instance, cul- ture, sport, in fine, the amenities of life,—such a one, sitting alone in his counting-house, may well swear that his children shall drink freely of the cup denied to him. And how can he — poor fellow —he expected to foresee the results: intoxication, folly, bitterness ? Many a father in the West has said: “My son is not like me; we have nothing in common.” “Why should he be like you?” one might reply. “You have kept him in cotton wool; you have humoured his whims; you have taught him to consider himself alone. Now you complain that he is selfish, indolent, and extravagant. Who made him so?” This question the fathers of the West are un- willing to answer. One can conceive no more pathetic condition of affairs: a father successful 74. Lite and Sport on the Pacific Slope beyond the dreams of avarice, conscious of powers turned to rich account, respected and admired by his fellows, a pillar of his State, and yet sensible that in the greatest thing of all, in the administra- tion of the most stupendous trust, in the care and culture of his own flesh and blood —he has failed ; that he has killed his best-beloved son with — too much kindness! This kindness, as in the case of King Lear, often breeds rank ingratitude, especially amongst the poor. Here is a story —TI cannot vouch for the truth of it— which illustrates a relation that too often exists between son and father. The son is speaking. ‘“ Yas—TI’ve had the worst kind o’ luck with the old man. I knew he was ailin’, so I paid his expenses out from Missourah, and fed him the best o’ corn all through the fall and winter. And then, when spring come and I was a calculatin’ that I’d get a summer’s work out of him, he up and died!” | Throughout the West, in the cottages of the poor and in the mansions of the rich, you will find. fathers and mothers the slaves of their children. The poor work their fingers to the bone in order that the little ones may wear clothes quite unsuited to their station in life. Upon a hundred ranches I have seen mothers cooking, washing, sewing, while the daughters of the house were reading novels or playing the piano. I have known a mother make her own underclothing out of flour sacks, when her little girl was wearing silk. “They can only have a good time once,” is the cant phrase of these altruists. The Children of the West 75 It never seems to occur to them to consider whether or not the children are “having a good time.” Certainly, compared with the children of other countries — France, Germany, England — they lack mirthfulness. Perhaps they are sensible, poor little dears, of the sacrifices made on their behalf; perhaps the strife around them, which they passively witness every hour of the day, has entered like iron into their souls; perhaps they, in common with their elders, attempt too much and learn too soon the weariness of satiety. I have talked with little maids of four, who knew that their dolls were stuffed with sawdust. I have seen the same little maids pull down their tiny skirts, blushing. 0, ye Prunes and Prisms! Ought a little girl of four to know that she has—legs? I remember one miss of seven (a born coquette, by the way) who hon- oured me with her friendship. She was in my room when I was unpacking a portmanteau, and she took the greatest interest in my coloured shirts. Presently she said softly, “My father buys my frocks, but Auntie gets my underclothes.” Then she added, with a queer little stare, ‘Perhaps I ought not to mention underclothes to a gentleman.” When they go to school, and they go too soon, evil besmirches them. From what I have learned from many parents, it is safe to assert that inno- cence is seldom found in the country schools of the West. One hesitates to indict a system of education that in many respects works admirably. One knows that a mother who is both cook and housekeeper cannot play the part of schoolmistress. And one sympathises with a natural ambition which 76 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope confounds means with ends. If a smattering of book-learning is the be-all and end-all of education, the mothers of the West are justified in sending their little girls to school. If, on the other hand, purity of mind, modesty, unselfishness, be deemed a maiden’s triple crown, she had better stay at home till she is old enough to know evil when she sees it, and, so knowing it, choose the good. When I first came to California, the girls, with few exceptions, enjoyed unrestrained liberty. They scoffed at apron-strings. They walked, and rode, and drove alone with the man of their choice. The mothers always stayed at home. They said proudly that they could trust their girls. This trust was a beautiful thing, quite ideal, but how often was it betrayed! You must ask the doctors, read the records, and talk with the young men who take the girls to the picnics and dances, and when you have done all this you can answer the question for yourself. In a country town, you will find the streets full of girls. They are sent alone on errands; they loaf about the station and post-office, they walk arm in arm up and down the thoroughfares. They ought, every one of them, to be at home working, helping their mothers, who— heaven knows!— want all the help they can get. And yet these same mothers admit that their girls are a hindrance to them in the kitchen and the laundry. “Bless you,” said one hard-working farmer’s wife to me, “ my daughter could n’t cook a meal o’ victuals to save her life.” From her tone I was left to infer that this inca- pacity was greatly to the girl’s credit. In the The Children of the West 7a West a stream is expected to rise higher than its source. A minute later the mother murmured, “I do wish that you could hear Alvira play Weber’s ‘Invitation to the Waltz.’ ” Alvira was sweet sixteen, had attended school since she was six, and what she knew of practical value could have been put into a grain of millet- seed. On the other hand, the boys are encouraged to earn an honest penny as soon as they are breeched. I am speaking of the sons of the poor. Many a small boy, out of school hours, sells papers, peddles tamales, or does “chores,” for a neighbour. The money so earned he spends on himself. This of course fosters independence. The boy learns to paddle his own canoe, to shoot the rapids. At fifteen he is —so to speak —a voyageur, a naviga- tor. The father is a “ back number.” The conceit of the very small boys, their bump- tiousness and braggadocio, always amaze the stranger and foreigner. I read a story the other day that must have been clipped from a Western newspaper. A father leaving home had specially commended the care of the mother to his small son, aged — five. That night, the urchin modified his evening prayer. He entreated the protection of Heaven on behalf of the absent sire; but he ended as follows: “Dear God, don’t bother about mamma, for I’m taking care of her myself.” My own little boy, a Native Son brought up in California, was very much excited at the prospect of a first visit to England. The battle of Omdur- man had just been fought. “I do hope,” he said, 78 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope after seeing the pictures in the “ Illustrated London News,” “that the Queen will keep the war in Egypt going —for me.” Another day he was listening attentively to the story of the Golden Calf and the Fiery Serpents. “ Well,” he remarked, as the Bible was closed, “ they were wicked, those Israelites. No wonder God was mad with them. J don’t blame him.” Irreverence is a characteristic of the children of the West. This is partly the fault of the pastors. I remember a funeral sermon preached by a Presby- terian minister upon a dead child. The child’s play-fellows were in church, and attentive listeners to a discourse mainly biographical. The preacher concluded : “I can see him; yes, I can see our dear little friend;” he looked upward, and the eyes of the children were immediately fixed upon the ceiling of the church. “There he is, corralled in Heaven, playing about with all the other little angels.” This allusion to the corral, that homely feature in the Western landscape, appealed forcibly to the imagination of the children, but surely the ridicu- lous was too perilously near the sublime. Speaking of funerals, I recall another anecdote that illustrates this peculiar blending of the sacred and the profane. In Southern California, funerals are, like the Irish wake, a source of entertainment to the many who attend them. If the deceased happens to have been in his lifetime a member of any order, such as the Oddfellows or Freemasons, his funeral becomes a public function, a parade. You march to the burial-ground clad in the uniform of The Children of the West 79 your order; a band furnishes appropriate music; at the grave certain rites are observed. But the solemn procession to the cemetery is robbed of its significance, by the rout that follows the benedic- tion. Peace, indeed, is left with the dead. The living race home, as if Death, with the “ tiger-roar” of his voice, were pursuing them. After one of these functions I encountered the chief mourner and mur- mured my condolence. He asked me in return what I thought of the funeral; then he added, before I could answer: “It was fine. Every thing according to Hoyle. Well sir, she’d been a good wife to me, and me and my friends appreciated that fact, and so — we gave her a good send-off !” Children attend these entertainments. Talking with the boys and girls of the West, one notes the bias of their minds to what is material rather than ideal. This gives to each child a certain personality — he must be reckoned with as an indi- vidual. His egoism is so plainly manifested that it becomes dominant. And this egoism of the child is pregnant with ill-omen for the future of the race. What makes for character — sense of duty, reverence, humility, obedience —is not inculcated by the majority of parents in the West. On the contrary, they encourage the egoism latent in all -children, till each becomes an autocrat. I shall never forget a morning I passed in what is called the “ Ladies’ Parlour” of a steamship. My mother was with me, prostrated by headache and sickness, and the room was full of fellow sufferers. Suddenly a boy marched in playing —toy bagpipes. The 80 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope skirl of the pipes at a distance has been known, I believe, to please some persons with Scotch blood in their veins, but the wildest pibroch ever played in Highland glen was sweet melody compared to the strains produced by this urchin. The women glared at him, but he played on, delighted with himself and his toy. His mother was present, un- protesting. Presently he flung down the pipes, walked to the piano, opened it, sat down, and began to hammer the keys with his feet. The mother smiled fatuously. I rose up and approached the child. “You play very nicely with your feet,” I ventured to say, as I lifted him from the stool, “ but some of these ladies are suffering with headache, and your music distresses them. Run away, like a good boy, and don’t come back again.” The child stared at me and obeyed. The mother was furious. Had I been Herod the Great, red- handed after the slaughter of the Innocents, she could not have looked more indignant or reproach- ful. I was interfering with the sacred rights of the American child to do what he pleased, where he pleased, and when he pleased. In the East —I am glad to say — Fashion has ordained that the children of the well-to-do shall be quietly dressed, soft-voiced, polite, and consider- ate. They flaunt no absurd silks and satins, they wear no jewellery, they play neither the piano nor the fool — in public. In the West it is otherwise. South of Point Concepcion, the children suffer from the effect of a climate ill-adapted to the de- The Children of the West 81 velopment of the Anglo-Saxon race. One hesitates to use the odious word, “décadent” in connection with them, but no other can be found. You will see many pretty faces, whose features lack strength and balance. The lads are pallid, narrow-chested, and rickety; the girls, like the roses, lack fresh- ness and fragrance. There is an exotic quality about them, a quality not without a charm, a languorous grace denied to the robuster children of the North. These are the orchids of the Pacific Slope. Their precocity is astounding. Most of them are allowed to read the public prints, and in particular the Sunday editions, wherein may be found a special page devoted to the young, and which the young — according to my experience — seldom read. In 1895 we were horrified by a dreadful double murder. Two girls were decoyed to a church, and there dis- honoured and despatched by a fiend of the name of Durrant. The case furnished hundreds of col- umns of what is known in editorial sanctums as “good stuff,” and for two years these details tainted the public mind. The very headlines were sufficient to debauch the imagination. To-day, you would hardly find on the Pacific Slope an intelligent boy of fifteen who is not familiar with the details of this murder. Finally, Dewey took the taste of Durrant out of their mouths. If the mental diet is too stimulating for the chil- dren, the food they eat is no less so. Some parents gravely contend that the tissues of a child’s stomach may be toughened, like his cuticle, by abuse. One man I know wakes up his children in the middle of the night to eat whatever he fancies: Welsh rarebit, 6 82 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope cold plum pudding, caviare, or pickled clams. “I like my babies around me,” he observed tenderly. I feared that he would n’t have them long, but he as- sured me that they were none the worse for these noctes ambrosiane. All the children of the poorer class eat too much salt meat, and drink tea that is little better than poison. The cooking on the ranches is inconceiv- ably bad. Soda and cheap baking-powders take the place of honest yeast; steaks and chops are fried, not broiled, and served sodden with grease; the vege- tables, particularly the peas, are tough and tasteless ; the puddings alone are palatable. As a rule, these viands are gulped down in a few minutes. The children fill their pockets with doughnuts (the Western word “sinkers” is expressive) and scurry away to their lessons and games. The elders take a dose of some patent medicine, and fondly believe that they have enjoyed a square meal. 7 The amount of medicine sold on the Pacific Slope is significant of either stupendous credulity or stu- pendous ill-health on the part of the people. And the children get more than their share of the drugs. The weakening of a general belief in the Great - Physician has quickened faith in the quacks. If Tommy cuts his finger the doctor is summoned ; if Mamie coughs, a lung specialist must be consulted ; if the baby has a pain, he must be dosed with pare- goric. In a country where health once reigned supreme, where doctors were unknown, where drugs were sold by the grocers, you may hardly find to- day a perfectly healthy family. One child has lost The Children of the West 83 his “adnoids,” another his tonsils; this one goes twice a week to an aurist; an oculist has just oper- ated upon that; a nose specialist (he won’t be long without a name) has the fifth under special treat- ment, and so forth. And yet, despite the money spent on them, de- spite the care and anxiety of the parents, despite the pampering, despite the endearments, the children of the Pacific Slope are emphatically neglected. You seldom see a father or a mother patiently and laboriously teaching a child. The common round is distasteful to the people of the West, the trivial task is abhorrent. The “grind” of slowly imparting to achild habits of self-control, obedience, and a sense of duty is a treadmill that few care to mount. Those who can afford it pay others to train their children for them, and this training is, as a rule, intermittent and ineffective. The religious training is practically in the hands of the Sunday-school teachers. The more intelli- gent of these will tell you, if you ask them, that their efforts are often futile, because at home the men of the family habitually make light of sacred things and names. I remember one very small boy who astonished his mother one night by sud- denly sitting up in bed and saying, “Well, I am a dam fool; I’ve forgotten to say my prayers!” Here again is the blend of sacred and profane. The good qualities of the children of the Pacific Slope are: originality, independence, pluck, and perspicuity. They are extraordinarily quick-witted and plastic, full of quips and odd turns of speech, 84 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope and blessed with the strongest imaginations. A grandmother gave me the following. She had explained very patiently the nature of that respect which is due to age from youth. At the end she asked, “Do you understand what I[ have been saying ?” “You bet I do,’ replied the grandson (aged six). “JT know that it would n’t do for me call you — Tom.” During a heavy rainstorm, an urchin was seen by his mother to drop upon his knees. “ Dear God,” prayed the child, “father says we have had rain enough. Please turn off the faucet.” This urchin once begged me to read aloud to him from the paper I held in my hand. I assured him that what I was perusing — the annual statement of one of the banks — would not interest him. He begged to contradict me. So I began: “ Capital Stock. . . $3,000,000.” | He interrupted me at once. Stock, seemingly, suggested dairy cows, for he said eagerly: “ By golly, three million dollars! Wouldn’t I like to own those cows, and would n’t I milk ’em for all they were worth, and sell’em when they went dry ?” Upon another occasion, he had returned from a visit to one of the neighbours’ wives, whom he pro- nounced a perfect lady. I took exception to the adjective and substantive, the person in question being a peasant. “Well,” said he, “she may not be a perfect lady, but she’s a very agreeable woman.” Upon the deck of a steamer I heard the fol- lowing: A small boy from the West asked a friend of mine, a striking-looking man, who he The Children of the West 85 was. “I’m the pilot,” replied he, with a twinkle in his eye. “The pilot,” repeated the urchin, thoughtfully. “Then why ar’n’t you on the bridge ?” These imps criticise their elders and _ betters freely. A tot said to me quite gravely : “My auntie is not as smart as she thinks herself. And she’s often very rude. She cont’adicted me this morning.” A snub —need it be said — is good powder wasted on the Western youth. I remember a lad of eigh- teen who was selling books. He went into the office of a physician notorious for his crabbed temper, and submitted his wares. The medico bade him be gone, in very unparliamentary terms. “Can you read?” demanded the youth, blandly. “ Read, sir! I don’t read such books as you sell.” “I sell Shakespeare, and the Bible. You don’t act as if you had read either. Good-morning.” This same youth — who surely will go far — had heard that at a certain bank the clerks had agreed to hustle any book agent who invaded their prem- ises. The book agent, it must be added, is regarded in the West as a beast of prey. Our young friend took his own line. Rushing into the bank, he ex- claimed excitedly, “ Boys, have you seen him ?” “Seen whom?” repeated the clerks in chorus. “That book agent.” “No, no. We want to see him! We’re fixed for him. The last fellow made us weary. We’re going to skin the next one alive. Where is he 2?” “He is—here!” said the youth dramatically. “Start right in, boys, and enjoy yourselves. When you get through [ll sell you some books.” 86 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope He sold his books. If they refuse to take a snub, they are quick to take a hint. There is an authentic story of a poor lad who approached a famous millionaire and asked for twenty-five cents (a shilling), wherewith to buy a meal. “A meal?” exclaimed the great man. “ Why, my boy, twenty-five cents will buy you five meals — of bread and water. And a healthy lad like you can live on two meals a day. I’vedone it. Here’s your quarter.” The boy took the coin and the advice. Years after he sought out the millionaire and thanked him. Since I first crossed the Rocky Mountains, an ex- traordinary stimulus has been given to all athletic exercises. In 1882 baseball was the only game. To-day the muscles of the youths are hardened and expanded by football, polo, golf, tennis, and bicycle riding. And yet the physiology of bodily exercise is entirely misapprehended, even more so than it isin England. In no country do the young men “scorch” as in the West. You may see them any Sunday upon the highways and byways. Their faces are streaming with perspiration; their eyes are popping from their heads; their brows are seamed with anxiety. Doubled up above the handle-bars they always seem to me the most piti- ful notes of interrogation. They are asking for health and strength. What are they getting ? I hold with Walt Whitman that “in man or woman a clean, strong, firm-fibred body, is more The Children of the West 87 beautiful than the most beautiful face;” I know, also, what athletics has done for the young men of the West; I am well aware of the many (who might have been drunkards and debauchees) whom a love of manly sport has reclaimed and regener- ated. But I cannot blind myself to the fact that in this, as in other matters, the pendulum has swung too far the other way. The strenuous com- petition that stalks in the market-place rages furi- ously in the playing-fields, too furiously for the weal of the athletes. In their play, as in their work, would it not be wise for the Sons of the West to give pause ? RANCH LIFE—I | hae Vel 7 i tid rat Wik’ UP EE) aL ioe 1s NG 5 Paps , 4 de mA i U | 1 Pe aaa Vv RANCH LIFE— I UTSIDERS look at ranch life through rose- coloured spectacles. The word “ranch” has peculiar charm: it sounds more pastoral, more alluring than “farm.” A farm suggests hedges, fences, stone walls. Of necessity, life on a farm would seem to be life within bounds, circumscribed by convention, lacking the freedom and freshness of the ranch. A ranch implies ampler pastures, purer air, the essence of Arcadian things. In the West the word is linked indiscriminately to a score of industries. We have cattle-, horse-, hog-, fruit-, berry-, chicken-, and even bee-ranches. According to your inclination, according to the amount of capital at your disposal, you may choose any one of these; but remember, you will infallibly fail— losing money, time, and probably health — unless you give to your ranch undivided energies, unwearied patience, a fair measure of brains, and a leaven of common-sense. The writers who have described ranch-life as easy and leisurely, a refuge for men who have broken down in the professions or in business, have — consciously or unconsciously — lied. On a cattle-ranch, you will be sensible of its remoteness. You are far from railroad and post- g2 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope office. Once a week, perhaps, you get papers and letters; once a week you see a fresh face, hear the tones of a fresh voice. The world wags on, but you are out of it. To some this isolation is intoler- able; to others, doubtless, it brings comfort and content. The life grows upon one. You rise early, feed your horse and yourself, and ride forth into the hills. After a time you begin to know your — cattle; you can see them, distinguish one from an- other at a distance that surprises the tenderfoot. If one is missing you are aware instinctively of the fact, and glance skyward. U e 4 , A i Ast, tf . eee has Yee teow) Pee er a, Ranch Life 93 of the “greasers,” however, can still fling a rope with such exquisite art that the loop seems to be guided by an invisible hand to the horn or hoof it is destined to encircle; they can vault on, and off, and over, a horse at full gallop, or snatch a coin from the ground as they race by — swinging far out of their big saddles and into them again with extraordinary grace and agility; they can “tail” a bull; they can “tie up” and wntie a wild Texan steer, single-handed; and they can break and ride anything that goes on all-fours. In the days be- fore the American occupation of the Pacific Slope the mastery of such feats was part, the larger part, of a caballero’s education, and the vaquero was held in high esteem. To-day, poor fellow, his occupa- tion is almost gone. There is plenty of work to be done on a big cattle- ranch: fences must be built and repaired; water troughs— where there are no streams— must be filled ; the hay-land must be sown to barley, and the crop harvested. You eat the plainest and most unpalatable fare, — bacon and beans, for the most part, with canned vegetables and dried apples and apricots. You sleep in the hardest of bunks, be- tween rough blankets. You wear canvas overalls. You smoke coarse tobacco. But you are strong and well. That is the reason why so many men, who would seem to be ill-equipped for a rough life, deliberately chose it in preference to any other. As a rule, the cowboys spend what they earn in drink, the most fiery whisky they can find —the brand known as “Sheepherder’s delight.” After 94 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope leading a sober and temperate life for perhaps two months they will ride into the nearest town, and proceed to paint it a beautiful blood-red. As long as the money lasts, all comers are invited to drink. When the last cent 1s spent the cowboy mounts his bronco and returns to the ranch, where, you may be sure, no indiscreet questions are asked. In the ’80’s, when southern California was still a pastoral country, these roysterers were anathema maranatha to the townsmen, despite the money they put into active circulation. You may see them to-day jog- ging into town, astride their wiry, fiddle-headed geld- ings (your true vaquero never rides a mare), clad in chappareros (long, loose leggins made of stout leather, designed to protect the legs in riding through the tough manzanita and chaparral), and wearing big stiff sombreros tied under the chin by a piece of black ribbon. The dandies are distin- guished by a fine silk neckerchief, loosely knotted, by the high-heeled boots (the high heels prevent the foot from slipping through the large wooden stirrups), by the silver mountings of the Mexican bit, by the rawhide bridle and cuerda, by the long buck-skin gloves. Those who wear canvas overalls instead of “chaps” will be careful to turn up the ends of them, so as to display the black trouser beneath, and when they dismount and lounge through the streets, you will mark an easy swagger, the cachet of the caballero. . Drunk, they are dangerous; sober, most capital fellows, — cheery, kindly, without fear, hard as nails, and generous to a fault. From such men Roose- velt recruited his famous Rough Riders, and they Ranch Life 95 make the finest irregular cavalry in the world; but they are and always will be —Ishmaelites. They are profoundly ignorant of everything outside their own calling, and always laugh disdainfully at a tenderfoot’s blunders. It is best to laugh with them, but sometimes the tables are turned. I know a man, now famous, who once silenced a camp full of cowboys. He had made some trivial blunder — I forget what — which provoked the jeers of the “boys.” “My God!” he exclaimed, “is it possible that you fellows, born and bred in this cow coun- try, laugh at me? Look here, I have been twice round the world, I speak half a dozen languages, I have lived, lived, mark you, in half the States of your Union, I have met your famous men; and you, you dare to laugh at me because I do not know the one little thing which you know. Well, laugh away, boys. What I don’t know about cow-punching is worth a laugh, but what you don’t know about everything else in the world is enough to make a man cry.” I have found a warm welcome in dozens of cow- boys’ camps and never, but once, anything else. On that occasion my brother and I were the unpremedi- tated cause of the “trouble.” We had been camp- ing out in the mountains, and had with us in our spring-waggon a small demijohn of whisky. This demijohn we carefully hid, at the special request of the foreman of the ranch, but the cook, who had not been to town for many moons, found it and an- nexed it as treasure-trove. It seems that this cook had had “words” that morning with the “ boss,” and our whisky, in large undiluted doses, fanned 96 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope into flame resentment that otherwise might have smouldered harmlessly till it burned out. As we were sitting together after supper, spinning yarns and smoking, the cook suddenly marched into the room, and bade the boss and the other cowboys be gone into the hills, or where they pleased, but off the ranch. He carried my Winchester rifle in his hand, and as he spoke covered our group, which dis- persed like a bevy of quail when a hawk circles overhead. In a jiffy, none was left in that room save the cook, my brother, and I. I cannot explain why we stayed, but we had received no orders to go, and we knew of course that the cook had no grudge against us. Then followed a scene, ludicrous enough now, but not so funny at the time. The cook para- ded up and down the room, assuring us that he was the King. To emphasise his claims, I remem- ber, he fired into the ceiling two royal salutes, and just then —it being moonlight outside —I saw a dark figure, pistol in hand, flit past the open door. There were two doors in the room exactly opposite to each other. At the same time I saw another figure, similarly armed, at the other door. The King, apprehending danger, brought his rifle to his shoulder, pointing it first to the right and then to ~ the left, according as the heads appeared and dis- appeared. Meantime he waxed grimly facetious, entreating the gentlemen outside to come in, or at least to stand still, and so forth. The comic side of it did not strike me till afterwards, because I was wondering whether it would not be expedient to lie down upon the floor, out of the line of fire, a posi- tion commended by all tacticians of the West. Ranch Life 97 However, I was sensible that the men outside were not going to shoot first, so I sat still and waited. Suddenly the King’s mood changed. He called to one of the men outside, the brother of the foreman: “Say, Charlie,—I’m cold. Bring me my coat; it hangs in the kitchen.” Now drunken men are sometimes as subtle as the serpent, and I decided that if I were Charlie, I should remain outside, and not play the valet, even to a king. Charlie, it seems, was not of my opinion, for he said quite naturally: “That’s all right: I’1l get your coat.” And in less than a minute he was standing in the open door with the coatin his hand. It was a plucky thing to do. The King eyed Charlie, and Charlie eyed the King. There was a light in Charlie’s keen grey eyes that was not to be mistaken by a sober man. “Give it to me,” commanded the King. Charlie held out the coat. The King, with an eye cocked at the door opposite, advanced to take it. “No funny business,” growled his Majesty. “It your brother sticks his ugly head into that door, I’ll shoot you deader’n mutton.” Charlie — as it proved afterward — had persuaded the others not to interfere. He wanted to play “a lone hand.” As the King put forth an arm for his coat, the other jumped like a cat at the rifle—and we jumped too, and everybody else jumped, till there was a big heap of men in the middle of the floor, and at the bottom of the heap the King. Presently we disentangled ourselves, and nobody was left on the floor save he who was no longer King, and the boss. 7 g8 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope “You are king, are you?” said the Boss. “Take that!” He had the monarch by the ears, and at “that” he raised the royal head, and pounded the floor with it, till the foreman entreated him to stop, for the flooring, he said, was rotten. Then the ex-King was handcuffed, and securely tied to a bed. Next day, the boss and the foreman led him to the ranch fence, and explained to him that if he had any con- sideration for his own health, he must never, never, never come back again. And I am quite sure he never did. I can tell another story that ends less happily, and which illustrates a peculiar phase of ranch life. Around nearly all the old Spanish grants, the ranchos proper of Southern California, lies Govern- ment land, valued by Uncle Sam at one dollar and a quarter an acre. A great deal of this land is worthless save for grazing purposes, and it often happens that the possession of a fine spring or a small creek gives the owner undisputed title to many hundreds of acres not worth taking up on account of a scarcity of water. But when it was proved that some of these hitherto neglected lands were the natural home of certain grapes and fruits, men were eager to file homesteads —as the phrase runs — upon them, and the squatters who had had the use of them for many years naturally felt aggrieved. In some cases they had fenced in these hills, to which they had no legal title what- ever. Not far from us was an old squatter who had grown rich upon Uncle Sam’s lands. He had, I think, some three hundred and twenty acres of ‘ ¥* Ranch. Life 99 his own, well-watered, and his stock roamed over a couple of leagues of rolling hills. One day a man and his wife filed their claim to a quarter section (160 acres) of these hills, and began to build a cabin. The first squatter protested and blasphemed —in vain. Finally, he and his son and a nephew deliberately stalked the stranger, and shot him dead on his own land; they also shot and wounded the wife, who dragged herself several miles to a neighbour, and recited the facts. Within twenty-four hours the murderers were locked up in the village “calaboose,” and during the following night they were taken out and lynched. The Vigilantes hanged them from a bridge not a mile from our ranch-house, and some children, crossing the bridge on the road to school, found the bodies stiff and stark at the end of two stout ropes. A rope had been provided for the nephew; but at the last moment, as he stood shiv- ering upon the ragged edge of eternity, he was released and commanded to leave the county for ever. He needed, I have been told, no urging. This case has a certain interest, because the old man, it appeared, had not fired a single shot; but it was equally certain that he, and he alone, had planned the affair. Further, he was rich, and the people in our county were only too well aware that in California it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to be convicted of murder in the first degree and executed. Accordingly, they very properly hanged an old scoundrel who otherwise would have escaped almost scot-free. L. of C. 100 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Many persons supposed that my brother and I were amongst the Vigilantes. We were not. We knew absolutely nothing of what was going on, so to speak, under our noses, till the next morning. What knowledge came to us after the event we discreetly kept to ourselves. One young fellow, I remember, a druggist, imprudently hinted that he could tell a strange story if he pleased, and it seems that towards midnight he had been wakened out of his sleep by the Vigilantes passing his drug- store on their way to the calaboose which adjoined it. It was said that the young man looked out into the night and saw a dozen masked men, that he heard the dialogue that ensued between the leader of the Vigilantes and the constable on guard, that he followed the party to the bridge (a most unwise proceeding), and witnessed the lynching. For a brief season this youth was the hero of the hour; then a quiet, middle-aged citizen, a man with a square brow and chin, and a pair of keen blue eyes, was seen to enter the drug-store, and — mirabile dictu !— after this the mind and memory of Peeping Tom became a blank. He had seen — nothing; he had heard—nothing; he knew — nothing. But observant persons remarked that ~ this young gentleman’s face, normally as ruddy as David's, had turned of a sudden a dirty grey-green ; so we may infer that the quiet, middle-aged citizen did not call upon his fellow-townsman to pass the time of day, or to buy drugs. According to the gentlemen who write with ease upon any subject within or without their ken, the West is now tame. My own experience is this: Ranch Life IOI a man in search of what is technically called “trouble” can find it on the Pacific Slope very quickly ; the man who minds his own business and keeps a civil tongue in his head is as safe in the wildest parts of the West as he would be in Lon- don — perhaps safer. Looking back, I can recall many deeds of violence: men stabbed or shot in drunken brawls, stage-coaches “ held up” and robbed, trains stopped and looted, banks sacked, and so forth, not to mention the horse and cattle thieves who used to infest our part of Southern California. But to-day, you will find few desperadoes, and those few, like the rattlesnakes, live in the brush hills far from telephone and telegraph. In the ’80’s it was not uncommon to meet the knights of the road at the taverns and saloons just outside the towns. In our county, during my time, the infamous Dalton gang of train-robbers owned a small ranch not far from ours. The notorious Black Bart has been pointed out to me. This gentleman always worked alone. Wearing a long black mask, he would not hesitate to “hold up” a stage-coach. When he had robbed the passengers, whom he paraded in line, he would politely request them to remount and be gone. Then he would pin to the trunk of a neighbouring tree a copy of verses, commemorating the event in quaint English, and signed by himself. I was given to understand that Black Bart was even prouder of his “ poetry” than of his exploits as highwayman. But even to-day, young Englishmen settling upon cattle ranches on the Pacific Slope would do well to mind what company they keep. I remember 102 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope one poor fellow, the son of a parson, who came to us many years ago. He arrived with an amaz- ing kit. Pistols and knives lay meekly by the side of manuals of devotion. He was armed cap-a- pie against the assaults of the world, the flesh, and the Devil. My brother and I looked at these weapons and advised the owner of them to keep them, where they were, at the bottom of a port- manteau. But he objected to this, being the son of a man who belonged to a church militant. Then we explained to him that a fight in California was a very different affair to a row with an English rough. It is, in fine, a combat & ouwtrance. At the time I am writing of, if one man struck another, the blow or slap was regarded generally as a deadly insult, only to be wiped out with blood. The man who was struck drew his pistol, if he carried one, and fired instantly. If he had no pistol or knife on his person, he went in search of these weapons, and, further, deemed it no shame to lie in wait for his antagonist, and to shoot him down like a dog when he came within range. If you care to consult the records, you will find dozens of cases of what people in Europe would pronounce cold-blooded murder, in which the murderer has not only been suffered to remain at large, but has won for him- self the respect and esteem of the community whose unwritten law he has vindicated. “It don’t pay to fool with that feller,” is the popular verdict; “he is too quick with his gun.” In such cases it 1s disgraceful to sustain defeat. I knew an Irishman whose daughter had married a crack-brained fellow, the terror of our district. Finally, this Greek met Ranch Life 103 another Greek, who dropped him dead in his tracks. Shortly afterwards, I was passing the Irishman’s house, and marked a red-headed urchin playing on the porch. In reply to my question: “ Whose boy is that ?” the Irishman murmured mysteriously : “Sorr—’tis me daughter’s husband’s chi-i-ild.” The name of the vanquished and the dead was too inglorious to be mentioned. The parson’s son listened attentively to what we said, but he remarked in conclusion: “Of course T shall be careful, but —” He never finished the sentence; we inferred from the tone that his father’s son did n’t want to fight, but—/ Not long after he struck a man, a foul-mouthed, drunken blackguard. Before the parson’s son knew what had happened, he was stabbed, and he died a few hours later. The man was arrested, tried by a jury of his peers, and acquitted / a ‘yh i | Va PM ¢ \\ ‘D f ef ee Pabhiy i SJ ‘ Ney VI RANCH LIFE—II Cy our ranch, we wore canvas overalls. My brother used to say that the unfastening of a large safety pin left him in condition for a plunge into the pool at the bottom of our corral. Yet on Christmas Day (and also upon the Queen’s first Jubilee) we solemnly arrayed ourselves in dress things and dined & la mode. We had many pets. One —a goat — gave us a deal of trouble. He was a remarkable beast, with a cultivated taste for sheet music, and he could swallow, whole, Sunday editions of San Franciscan newspapers: a feat never accomplished by mortal man. If anything was missing on the ranch, such as a monkey-wrench, or a button-hook, or a packet of tobacco, we always knew where it was — inside the goat. Finally he took to roosting on the piano, for neither bars nor bolts kept him out of our sitting-room; and he had a playful habit of ap- proaching you very quietly from behind and then — Bif! We loved that goat, but the time came when we had to choose between him and our Lares and Penates. It was no use giving him away, because he refused to be a party to the transaction, and always came back more wicked than _ before. Our Chinaman said he was a devil. So he was condemned to death, and three of us drew lots to 108 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope decide who should be the executioner. I shall not reveal upon whom that lot fell, but the man who slew the goat has never been quite the same since. He carries the brand of Cain. We had also a tame pig that answered to the name of Dolly. Dolly was a thoroughbred Poland- China, and she used to follow me about like a dog and eat out of my hand. Dolly became enormously fat, and after a time refused positively to budge from the kitchen door, transferring her affections, after the manner of her sex, from her lawful lord and master to another, the cook, who wooed her wantonly with wash. Dolly was eaten; and we have never dared since then to speak disparagingly of cannibals. We had also a parrot that was pos- sessed not of one but of a dozen devils. Some parrots attain a great age, but this bird died young —I am glad to say. Of course we tamed many colts: a grave mistake unless you intend them for a circus. It is easy to teach a horse to shake hands, and waggle his head, and stand on a tub, and lie down; but you cannot teach him a sense of the fitness of things. I remember a black whom I used to drive as leader of a pony tandem. He was on such intimate terms with me that he never questioned his right to do as he pleased. This perfidious wretch would not only stop when he came to a hill, but also lie down, flat on his back with all four legs in the air, —a disgraceful object. Speaking of horses reminds me of an incident. Some neighbours and friends of ours had a horse called Alcalde. Alcalde was a most respectable ‘ATLLVO fO HONNE V Ranch Life 109 person, but like all of us he had his failing: he would flick his tail over the reins. Now it hap- pened that my friend was of a nautical turn, and in his youth he had learned the art of tying wonderful knots. Accordingly, one day, when he was about to take his wife for a drive, he tied down Alcalde’s tail so tightly and so securely that not a wiggle was left in it. Now it happened that only that morning my friend’s wife had turned on the water, — water, you must understand, is very pre- cious on a ranch in Southern California, — and, alas! she had neglected to turn it off, being distracted possibly by household cares; so the water had flowed away, leaving the family tank empty and cracking beneath the ardent rays of the sun. Con- ceive if you can the wrath of a husband condemned by a wife’s carelessness to pump many hundreds of gallons of water! You may be sure that he (he was an Englishman) told his unhappy wife she had committed the unpardonable sin, and she, poor soul, apprehending the magnitude of her offence, held her peace (which is remarkable, because she was a daughter of the West). Perhaps — you may draw your own conclusions — the husband was sorry that he had spoken so harshly, and thought that a drive behind a fast-trotting horse would establish happier relations between two who should be one. Be that as it may, after the drive was over, he be- gan to unharness Alcalde, his wife standing by and talking to him. The traces were unhooked, the breeching straps unbuckled, and then Alcalde was commanded to leave the shafts. But Alcalde, wise as Balaam’s ass, never stirred, for he knew that his 110 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope tail was still fast to the buggy. Thereupon my friend took the whip and applied it smartly to Alcalde’s quarters. Alcalde, who had doubtless been nursing his wrongs throughout that afternoon, and who now was given an opportunity, as the lawyers say, to show cause, retaliated by kicking the buggy into a heap of kindling wood. My friend’s wife watched this performance with interest, and when it was over she turned to her husband and said quietly: “ My dear, after this, I shall turn on the water and let it run as often and as long as I please.” Of the hired men and girls who honoured us by working for wages which an English curate would not despise, Il could write currente calamo, but I dare not do it, for I feel like the stout gentleman who remained in the plains, because he was sensible that in the hills he might begin to roll, and go on rolling, till he rolled out of the world altogether. I have so much material that I dare not cut the wire which holds the bale together. One or two stories, however, may be pulled out, without dis- turbing the rest. We employed a man who in his youth had had an encounter with a circular saw. The saw, in such cases, generally has the best of it ; and on this occasion two of our hired man’s fingers were left in the pit. Upon one of the remaining fingers he wore a diamond ring! And he actually told me that his hand “kind o’ needed settin’ off.” It never seemed to strike the poor fellow that the proper place for that maimed hand was his pocket. He used to wave it about — so my brother said — as if it were a Pampas plume. Ranch Life VIt Another anecdote illustrates that amazing lack of a sense of proportion which characterises the people of the West. We had a girl, as cook, who was always leaving us to assist at the funerals of her relations. These died one after the other. Finally the mother died, and the girl asked for a week’s leave. At the end of the week I drove up to her father’s house to fetch Jane, and he (the father) came out to speak to me. Naturally I murmured a few words of condolence. “Yes,” he replied mournfully, “ poor Jane, poor girl, she has had bad luck,” he seemed to ignore his share in it; “she’s lost in one year,” he began to reckon on his fingers, ‘ yes, —Tom, Mamie, her uncle Charlie, her mother, and to-day, this very morning, she has lost Dick.” “Good heavens!” I exclaimed, confounded by such unparalleled misfortunes. “You have lost Dick! Let me see, he was your youngest boy, wasn’t he?” “No,” said the man, gravely, “Dick was poor Jane’s canary bird. She thought the world of it. And it died this morning. Too bad, —ain’t it ?” Max O’Rell, in one of his lectures, pointed out the radical difference between the French servant, Marie Jeanne, and the English Mary Jane. “Marie Jeanne,” he would say, “puts her wages into a stocking and puts that stocking into a hole in the ground; Mary Jane puts her wages into a new hat, puts the hat on to her head, and gets photo- graphed in it.” I wish it were possible to repro- duce Mons. Blouet’s quaint, ironical accent, and to show you the quirk of his eyebrows. I do not 112 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope know what he said about the Californian hired girl, — possibly he never had the honour of meet- ing her. Many queer characters lived within a small radius of our ranch-house. I dare say we appeared equally queer to them, for I often intercepted winks and grins not intended for my eyes which bespoke a keen sense of the humorous. Reciprocity is a blessed thing, and I am happy to think that we afforded some of our friends as much amusement as they furnished us. One most remarkable instance of how much stranger truth is than fiction came under our immediate notice: a case of Enoch Arden. There were two brothers, and the eldest married a wife, who bore him children. Then, tired perhaps of domestic joys, he sailed away — seemingly for ever. Now the younger brother had lived beneath the elder’s roof, and he knew that his brother’s wife was as gold that has been tried in the fire; accordingly, when the years passed and the elder never returned, nor sent word that he was alive, it seemed good to the younger to marry his brother’s wife, which he did, and in due time became, in his turn, the father of several children. And then, like a bolt from the blue, the man who had | disappeared reappeared, descending “ perpendicu- lar,” as Sterne would say, with a“ me voici mes enfants!” What happened? If youcome to think of it, this is a nice little problem — something akin to Mr. Stockton’s Lady or the Tiger riddle. Here were two husbands, two fathers, — and one wife! The problem was solved to the entire satisfaction of all persons concerned, including Mrs. Grundy, who Ranch Life 113 is not quite so particular in the West as she is in Mayfair. It was obvious, you will admit, that the elder had the law on his side, but only a tenth of it, for the very substantial nine-tenths were and had been for many years in the possession of the younger. It is also obvious that the elder had no such passion for his spouse as, shall we say, Juliet inspired in the heart of Romeo. He had deliberately forsaken her. Still, it is not impossible that he had often re- pented, thinking, may be, of his children’s faces, and the old homestead, and the savoury dishes that his wife could make (for she was an excellent cook). Mind you, he had not been lost ina sub-arctic forest, or living on a desert island, or doing anything, in short, which could be pleaded as an excuse for his absence and silence. The story is tragic from an English or New England point of view. You will say at once that the sailor went back to sea. Nota bit of it. He bought a piece of land hard by, and settled down comfortably as his brother’s neigh- bour. He did not want—so he said—to make any “trouble;” but he wished to see his children, and his brother, and the mother of his children. So he acted according to his convictions, and the people said Amen. It seemed to them, as it seemed to the sailor, the only sensible thing to do. In the brush hills were many squatters — wild folk, living the primal life, half-clothed, half-starved, drinking coffee made from roasted barley, eating what they could shoot, and not unfrequently what they could steal. A friend of ours, a foreigner, a man of breeding and culture, went to live amongst 8 114 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope them. One day, I asked him the why and the wherefore of it. “I will tell you,” said he, very gravely. “I have lived, as you know, in ze capi- tals of ze vorld. And I came to ze conclusion zat society was a big monkey-house, and zat all ze monkeys were trying to pull each ozer’s tails. But I will tell you—entre nows—ze monkeys in ze backwoods of California are worse, far worse, zan ze monkeys in society!” Some of the men, however (they are generically known as “Pikers,” because many of them came originally from Pike County, Missouri), if found lacking in the “small, sweet courtesies of life,” have, none the less, some interesting attributes. I knew one capital fellow who in happier circum- stances would have become a naturalist of note. He was what is called “a market hunter;” and none was more familiar than he with the habits and habitat of game. He seemed to know by instinct where the big trout might be found, and could catch them with his hands; he was the finest stalker I have ever met; he used to come striding into town with dozens of quail, when other market hunters would tell you that there were no birds in the country; he could always | predict the coming of the snipe and wild duck, of which he shot thousands.annually; and he was, in his youth, as strong and as handsome as Hercules. Another man was an ornithologist, a daring fowler and scaler of cliffs. He performed the almost impossible feat of robbing a condor’s eyrie. These birds are larger than the South American condor, with a spread of wing exceeding Ranch Life 115 ten feet, and a beak powerful enough to crack the shank bone of a sheep. Our friend captured a young condor and nourished it successfully for some weeks. Then he asked us to arrange with the Zoological Society for its purchase and ship- ment, but, unfortunately, before we could do so the bird died. These rapacide are only to be found, I believe, in the County of San Luis Obispo, and in the mountains that le near'the seaboard in California Baja. Another Missourian, a cousin of the last, was also a market hunter and a naturalist. He had made a special study of wild bees, the bees that hive in holes in the steep sandstone cliffs and those also who hive in rotten trees. From the sale of the honey taken from them, from the sale of game and venison (the latter swb rosa) and fish, both sea- fish and trout, this son of Arcadia supported him- self, his wife, two brothers, his wife’s mother, and a large family of children! He often told me that he could not work, using the word work in its Western significance; yet, in his own calling, he laboured more assiduously and to better purpose than two ordinary hired men. I have not entered into a detailed account of our ranch duties, because these will be treated in the appendix. Of our amusements something may be said. At one time we played polo, and I believe I am en- titled to the credit of introducing the game to the Pacific Slope. We used to play regularly in ’83, and I should be very interested to know if the game was played West of the Rocky Mountains 116 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope at an earlier date. The vaqueros delighted in it, and proved amazing players, although it was im- possible to teach them team play. Each played for his own hand, and each rode as if he had a dozen lives. I can remember one memorable game when four of us Englishmen played against four vaqueros. Half the county witnessed the match, and the excitement was tremendous: the women standing up in the spring waggons and shouting, and the men betting and cursing. The umpire had a sorry time of it, for our opponents broke every rule, written or unwritten. The game was drawn: each side winning two goals. We should have won hands down had our antagonists ridden ponies like ours under standard size. But we had conceded to them the odds of riding what horses they pleased, and as many as they pleased. So they outgalloped us from first to last. But it was a glorious match! Every man who played was more or less hurt; but no bones were broken, and no money changed hands. Some people imagined that we made the game a draw on purpose. I, as captain, can testify that we played to win, and were within an ace of losing. We had plenty of fun apart from polo, breaking our ponies and training them to jump. And we practised throwing the lariat, although we never became skilful with it. There were no race- meetings in our county till the County Fairs were organised; but one man would match his horse against another’s, and these matches would gener- ally take place upon the Pizmo sands, a magnificent race-course fifteen miles long and fifty yards wide. Ranch Life 117 Here also were held the clambakes and barbecues: Homeric feasts whereat the meat was hung upon long willow spits, roasted over glowing wood-coals, and eaten with a sauce cunningly compounded of tomatoes, onions, and chiles. These delightful en- tertainments were given and attended by Span- ish people for the most part. The fair sefioritas would bring their guitars, and sing those pathetic love lilts which have a charm so distinctive and peculiar and ephemeral, for they are passing with the people who sang them, and will soon be utterly forgotten. After the barbecue, the men would smoke, and often take a nap, and then would follow some feats of horsemanship. A race be- tween a caballero and a man afoot to a post twenty- five yards distant, and back, was always well worth watching. As a rule the man beat the horse on account of the difficulty in turning. Some of the country dances were amusing. Jack always took his Jill to these functions, and certain unwritten laws were rigorously observed. It was not considered good form to take your partner out- side the ballroom. After the dance, you led her to a seat, and, bowing, deserted her. One English- man, at his first village dance, got himself into what might have proved a serious scrape. He had no Jill of his own, and being introduced toa pretty one belonging to somebody else, made him- self agreeable. The girl danced with him, and was then taken for a short stroll outside beneath those stars which seem to shine more brightly in Cali- fornia than anywhere else — particularly when you are young. I must not presume to say what passed 118 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope between the pair, but I am sure nothing of more importance than a few idle compliments, for the maid was very pretty, and she danced like a sylph, and the man—JI knew him well—could turn a phrase. When they returned to the dancing hall, a waltz had begun, and Jack now appearing to claim it, little Jill was easily constrained to give it to the other. My friend told me afterwards that he marked a ring upon her forefinger, a gold ring with a diamond set in the middle of it, and he was rather surprised when she refused to leave the heated room after the waltz was over. She blushed too when he begged her to go to supper with him, and said, without assigning any reason, that that was quite impossible. The Englishman, unconscious of giving offence, sat down and entertained his part- ner to the best of his ability. Suddenly, a young farmer strode across the room, and, standing in front of the maid, said in an angry voice: “Give me my ring.” “ But —” protested the maid. “Give me my ring.” As she was pulling it from her finger, the English- man understood. He had been annexing some- body’s best girl! So he rose up, and grasping the youth’s arm led him to the door and into the road, where apologies and explanations were offered and accepted. These dances always began with a Grand March, a very solemn and silent function, a parade of Jacks and Jills walking arm in arm to the sound of appropriate music. During the quadrilles the steps were called by a Master of Ceremonies, the language Ranch Life 119 used being for the most part French, although I did not find this out for a long time. We, being Eng- lishmen, made a sad mess of these steps — which were often peculiar and complex; but the word “Swing Partners,” never failed to adjust our diffi- culties and blunders. I can well remember one dance in a small village at which this command was given so often that I ventured to ask my partner if, in her opinion, the Master of Ceremonies knew what he was doing. “He’s rattled,” she replied glibly. “Whenever he forgets, he says, ‘Swing Partners, and while we’re a swingin’ he thinks over what comes next. I think ‘Swing Partners’ more interesting than ‘ Sachez, or ‘ ala main left, — don’t you?” Now in those days “ Sachez” and ‘a la main left” were manceuvres executed with great dignity and grace; you accorded your partner nothing more than the tips of your fingers in the latter, whereas in the former you advanced and retreated upon the tips of your toes. But at “Swing Part- ners,” you grasped the young lady firmly round the waist, and were not rebuked too severely if her feet, in the abandon of the pirouette, swung clear of the ground altogether. Such freedom would be eyed askance in the large towns, but I am talking of the hamlets of Southern California — long ago. Accordingly, I assured my partner that in my opinion “ Swing Partners” was — interesting. When you are introduced to a young lady in the country, she will probably repeat your name. Mr. Robinson begs to present Mr. Jones to Miss Smith. Mr. Jones murmurs “ Miss Smith ;” and Miss Smith 120 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope murmurs “Mr. Jones.” If Mr. Jones be English, she is sure to add: “From London, I presume.” This always annoys an Englishman of the upper and upper-middle classes, because he does not wish to be taken for a cockney. I can recall meeting two ladies who were not from the country, but essentially town-bred. They too “ presumed” that I was from London. I said, “ No.” “Perhaps,” said the younger of the two, “you have been in London?” and on my admitting as much, she continued: “And perhaps you have met a friend of ours, Mr. Simpkins ?” I regretted that I had not the pleasure of Mr. Simpkins’ acquaintance, but the lady was not satis- fied. “Hngland”—I make no doubt that her thoughts ran in this strain— “is a small country. These men must have met some time and some- where.” Accordingly she smiled and murmured: “He has curly hair and he was connected with a large firm, yes, a very responsible firm — the jewel- lery line. Are you sure you have never met him ?” “ Never,” said I. “ He had a jealous wife,” she insisted; “and his hair was beautiful: black and curly — was n’t it, Sadie 2?” “He was an elegant gentleman,’ assented Miss Sadie; “and his wife was — terribly jealous.” I hinted that curly hair and moral rectitude did not always, so to speak, trot in the same class. I have no doubt that Mrs. Simpkins was not jealous without reason. In ’86 the rise in the value of land, with increased Ranch Life 121 taxation and a fall in the price of cattle, turned many rancheros into farmers. The big Spanish grants were cut up and sold in small tracts to Eastern and mid-Western buyers. These men fenced their farms with barbed wire, built ram- shackle board-and-batten houses and barns, and talked glibly of cmprovements. Across the fair face of the Southern Californian landscape was inscribed the grim word—Ichabod. In an incredibly short time, the superb trees — the live oaks, white oaks, madrones, sycamores, and cotton-woods — were chopped down. A spirit of utilitarianism was abroad, smiting hip and thigh, sparing nothing, not even the ancient mission of San Luis Obispo. It stands to-day smugly respectable in a cheap modern overcoat of concrete and paint. The pic- turesque tiles have been thrown to the void; the pillars and arches have been pulled down; and the padres’ garden — a cool sequestered pleasance, fra- grant with herbs whose very names and uses are forgotten — has been subdivided into town lots! Once, upon the steps of the church, I met an old Spanish woman, whose withered face was framed in a soft black shawl, most becomingly draped. She chattered of the pleasant yesterdays, and I asked idly if she approved the changes that had been wrought in the ancient building. “My American friends,” she answered in her own tongue, “tell me to wear a jacket with big sleeves, and to buy a bonnet, but, sefior, this shawl suits me best. And the Mission was getting like me —ugly and wrinkled; but I wish they had left it — its old shawl.” 122 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope My brother and I sold our cattle, and began to sow wheat in our valleys and on our hills. Some of the neighbours planted out large orchards and vineyards; others opened stores. Churches and school-houses were built. Everywhere, even in the brush hills, was heard the buzz of the big threshing machines, the skirl of the circular saws, the clang of the hammer on the anvil; all the sounds, in fine, of what is called Prosperity. The tiny hamlet that lay upon the outskirts of our ranch became a bustling village. My brother and I rubbed our eyes, just as Rip Van Winkle rubbed his when he returned to the town that he had known as Sleepy Hollow. But if the dust was still in our eyes, we were soon sensible that those around us were wide awake. The change from past to present was as the contrast between Jacob and Esau. The vaquero, rough, honest, brave, and chivalrous, had galloped away to other pastures ; in his place stood the farmer, the smooth-talker, the man of guile, cunning, and crafty. Gone too were the long days in the saddle, gone with the quail and the wild ducks, and the deer and the antelope. Our ploughshares were bright, but our guns rusted in their cases. On a wheat ranch, the work begins before cock- crow, and it ends when you fling yourself, spent and aching, upon your bed. For in a new country leisure is seldom found on a farm. There is so much that clamours for adjustment and readjust- ment: trees must be felled and split up into posts ; post-holes must be dug (two feet deep) ; wire must be stretched ; stumps must be taken out; brush must Ranch Life 123 be burned off; and so forth —ad infinitum. And above us hung the impending sword of uncertainty. Our county had not then passed the experimental stage. Speaking personally, I was always conscious that no matter how hard we worked, that the har- vest would be reaped by others: that they would profit by our mistakes. Of the many mistakes that we made, it is pain- ful but expedient to speak. We planted vineyards and were compelled to plough them up when they came into bearing, because we had chosen varieties ill-adapted to our particular soil; we (I speak now of my brother and myself) planted orchards of prunes and apricots and apples and pears; and they came to nought because we lacked the special knowledge that is now the inheritance of the Western horticulturist; we tried to breed fine fowls, prize pigs, fast trotters, and we failed, not because we lacked intelligence or energy or pa- tience, but because we didn’t know how, as a child would say. And we attempted to do too much, as our neigh- bours did. To use a homely expression, salted and peppered to suit the Western palate: “ We bit off more ’n we could chew.” Upon the ordinary ranch, of course, mixed farm- ing has become a necessity. In early days, you seldom found milk or cream upon the tables of the big rancheros. The wheat farmer bought his vege- tables, his hams and bacon, his eggs, his fruit, his Thanksgiving turkey,—everything that was con- sumed in his house. This policy was justified then by the price of wheat; it can be justified no longer. 124 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope The petty farmer, who to-day buys anything at the local store except tea and coffee and sugar and clothes, is either a fool or a spendthrift. It is so easy to have a “home” on the Pacific Slope: roses bloom perpetually ; all fruits and vege- tables grow in profusion and perfection; the dairy, the poultry yard, and the hog pen should keep the table abundantly supplied. What ruined the farmers in the hard times was not drought, nor low prices, nor bank failures, but big store bills and big mortgages. If the farmer and his wife and his sons and daughters had been content to wear canvas and fustian, to eat only what was raised on the ranch, to work together — the hus- band and his sons behind the plough and harrow, the mother and daughters in the dairy and poultry yards —they would have weathered the storm. Instead of this, they kept up appearances. The ranch was mortgaged and crop-mortgaged, and every acre sown to wheat: a dishonest speculation, which proved disastrous also. I have known some happy farmers —a few. If you wish the soil to bless you, you must wrestle with it, as Jacob wrestled with the angel. And the fight must be— without gloves and to the finish. Kid-glove farmers are the most unhappy of all. And the soil will stain your hands and roughen them; and the hard toil will warp your mind as it will bend your back. Great loss is involved; and the gain may not be easily com- puted. And yet despite an experience which has been unfortunate, I firmly believe that life in the open air, beneath the genial skies of the Pacific Ranch Life 26 Slope, upon a rich and generous soil, ought to be a life worth living. “ The secret lore of rural things, The moral of each fleeting cloud and gale, The whispers from above that haunt the twilight vale.” These to me have inexpressible charm, a charm the greater perhaps because they may not be lightly apprehended. To the farmer whose heart is in his work, there may, there must come many trials and disappointments, for he is the plaything of the elements, the victim of laws that he cannot con- trol; but there will come also, in the fulness of time, the harvest, the golden sheaves that a man can take with him when he dies. To the farmer in the West whose heart is not in his work, I can only say that it were better for him if he had never been born. For the seamy side is there: rough, encrusted with frustrated hopes, scored by many harsh lines, like the faces of the women who work too hard. Always you are haunted by the sullen spectre of a dry year, the dry year that comes, it is true, only once in twenty years, and leaves when it does come the hearts of the farmers as colourless and arid as the brown, bleak hills which encom- pass them. In some years, too, the rain falls capri- ciously, bringing plenty and prosperity to one, to another want and misery. I have stood day after day watching the green spears of wheat as they turned sere and yellow, bending at last in abject supplication for the moisture that came not; and I have seen, how often! the blight and wire worms 126 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope ravaging a landscape, making it leprous and un- clean. On the orchards and vineyards fall frosts and scale, transmuting the silvery buds into charred cinders, blackening the green- shoots and tender leaves till the trees would seem to be draped in crape, mourning for their dead blossoms. And here, in this land of sunshine, as elsewhere, disease spares not, and if you are living far from town and doctor, you must wait in torment for the help that is so long in coming. Your child, your wife, is dying perhaps, and you sit beside what is dearest to you in all the world, straining your ears to catch the sound of the galloping horse that may bring life or find death. I have already spoken of the sense of isolation. If you have led the gentle life, if you have depended largely upon others, if your nature craves the fric- tion of human intercourse, if fine music, beautiful pictures, the playhouse, the cathedral, have become to you not superfluities but necessities, then ranch life will surely be hateful and unprofitable. The domestic difficulties drive some housewives distracted. Ona ranch it is hard to keep servants, even if you are rich enough to pay them well for their services. Sometimes, for many weeks, a mis- tress is compelled to do her own cooking; she can- not buy what she wants from the village stores ; the meat is tough and poor in quality; the groceries are adulterated. These things are not trifles. What affected us more than anything else was the consciousness that we were living in a cwl-de- sac. Happily, my brothers and I had so much in Ranch Life 127 common that we were more or less independent of others. Yet this very fact contracted our sympa- thies ; our circle, instead of widening, grew smaller and smaller till it contained nothing but ourselves. When we stepped out of it, 1 remember, we were always amazed to find out how unconsciously we had lost touch with civilisation. Great affairs that were interesting the world that thinks and reads excited in us but a tepid interest; we were queerly sensible that nothing mattered very much except the price of cattle, and the amount of feed in the pastures, — all the rest was leather and prunella. I have been tempted to dwell only upon memo- ries that grow brighter and more fragrant as the years roll by. How often, after a hot summer’s day, I have watched the brown foothills, as the purple shadows were stealing across them. It is then that the breeze from the ocean stirs the tremu- lous leaves of the cotton-woods; it is then that the cattle wind slowly across their pastures, leaving the cafions and gulches where they have lain dur- ing the sultry hours; it is then that a golden haze envelops all things: a glamour as of the world unseen, a mirage so fair to the eye, so cunningly interwoven with fact and fancy, that the realities of life, no matter what they may be, seem to melt away into the gathering shadows. And after the sun has set, the air is filled with enchanting odours, — the odours of a land that the Lord has blessed, the scent of herbs innumerable, the balmy fragrance of the pines, the perfume of the wild flowers, a pot-pourri of essences distilled by night alone. 128 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope These are dear to the sons and daughters of the West: the promise, so to speak, of better and hap- pier days, when life on the Pacific Slope will be purged of what is mean and sordid, purged and purified. This is the dream of those who love the West. Is it only a dream, a vision of Utopia? It would seem that only cities please a generation not con- tent with rural joys. Worldly wisdom, what Maurus Jokai calls our evil angel, tells a young man that he can never make a fortune on a ranch, which is true. It is also true that the same young man, nine times out of ten, will make no more than a bare living in the town, but this knowledge is withheld from him. Only the very few have the money-making capacity; only the very few can come to their full stature in the over-crowded streets of a big town; the many die in middle age, worn out and weary, sick in mind and body, paupers in all that constitutes true wealth. At the mines, on the cattle ranges, in the orchards and vineyards, on the farms, these same men, working as hard and patiently, would preserve their health, achieve independence, and learn at length the lessons that only Nature can impart, the lessons which teach a man not only how to live. but how to die. BUSINESS LIFE a “< = ‘_—+ J eM Toma ian) at vy f NIUAL CM he TS et tl »" ua & fy Ae ; Vil BUSINESS LIFE OME years ago, an article appeared in the “Cos- mopolitan Review,” entitled: “The Young Man in Business.” It was written by the editor of the “Home Journal,” Mr. Edward Bok. None reading the article carefully could fail to mark two qualities in it: the sincerity of the writer, and his cock-a-whoop faith in his creed. Mr. Bok, I be- lieve, came to America as a boy with no credentials save those that are inscribed upon an honest face, with no capital save health, strength, and common- sense. To-day he is a rich man, widely known and respected. Some people laugh at Mr. Bok because he caters and caters successfully to a certain class of readers. Perhaps he is, in a sense, the William Whitely of journalism, the Universal Provider. You may be sure that Mr. Bok never laughs at himself —he hasn’t time. Life to him is a syno- nym of effort. Watch Sandow when he is putting up his three hundred pound bell; you will mark a frown upon his face. Singers are trained to smile sweetly when warbling; did you ever see a tenor smile when he was standing on tip-toe at- tacking the high “C”? Never. In fine, effort warps and twists the face, as it warps and twists the body. This was abundantly set forth between the lines of Mr. Bok’s paper. The writer spoke 132 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope convincingly of the fierce competition that rages around all trades, all arts, all sciences. He made it plain that to succeed —as he interprets success —you must not only work hard, you must work harder than anyone else. Whatever pace be set, do you set a faster. If your competitor works ten hours a day, do you work twelve. You must read the books, and those alone, that have a direct bear- ing on your work; you must talk to the people, and to them alone, who can push your fortunes; you must eat and drink and make merry, bearing in mind the penalties that wait on excess; you must beware of the club, the theatre, the campus, because these will extinguish the sacred fires of energy. I am not quoting Mr. Bok verbatim, but in sum and substance that is what he said. Reading the arti- cle, I was sensible that nothing short of this eternal manifestation of energy, this perfervidum ingenium which seems to be the peculiar heritage of the Scandinavian, would prevail. The mere recital of what ought to be done made. my bones ache. Since, I have never thought of Mr. Bok without thinking also of the fable of the two frogs. The frogs, you will remember, fell into a bucket of cream. One of them, conscious of weakness, knowing that night was coming on, that he could not scale the slippery sides of the bucket, that it would be hope- less to try to keep afloat till morning, incontinently drowned. The other struggled and struggled, and was found next morning by the milkmaid alive and well — upon a pat of butter! We are not told any more; but you may be sure that the hero sang the song of the churning to all the frogs in Frog- “LSVa ONIMOOT *“LAAMLS LANYVIN Business Life 123 land, and became a great and shining example to his race for all time. Now Mr. Bok’s paper —as has been said — laid stress upon the comparative value of effort, but he laid still greater stress upon the superlative value of concentrated effort. According to him, it is ne- cessary to place all your eggs in one basket — and to watch that basket. Unhappily, this advice does not commend itself to the Native Son of the Golden West. He likes to place his eggs in many baskets; and then he sets himself the task — thereby wearing himself to skin and bone — of trying to be in two places at one and the same time, — like Sir Boyle Roche’s bird. If you had access to the ledgers of the men who have become bankrupts in the last decade, you would find, under Profit and Loss, that the profits made in the bankrupts’ regular business had been squandered and lost in half a dozen or more wild-cat enterprises. They will generally plead in extenuation that they have had bad luck; which reminds one of the story of the man who murdered his father and mother, and then invoked the mercy of the Court upon the ground that he was an orphan. In a certain town I know there is a sign, upon which is inscribed the following legend : — “ HOME-MADE BREAD: JOB PRINTING: RUBBER STAMPS.” Bread, of course, demands in the making clean hands; job printing is more defiling than pitch. One person was baker, printer, and rubber stamp 134 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope manufacturer. I ordered a rubber stamp, and arranged to call for it at a certain hour. It was not ready at the stipulated time, because — so said the baker —the dough had been troublesome that morning. When I called again later, the stamp was still unfinished, because —so said the printer — some job work had been promised by noon, and as the dough had not risen properly, the type-setting had been necessarily postponed. It was a case of Stick won’t beat Dog; Dog won’t bite Pig; &c. This robbing of Peter to pay Paul is the particu- lar sin of most Western business men; it clogs the wheels of progress; it palsies prosperity; it keeps capital seeking investment in the vaults of the banks. In hard times it spells stagnation. After the collapse of the land boom, I heard many a man say: “JT have to pay what I owe, but nobody pays my bills receivable.” (A curious perversion of fact. No money changed hands at all. In the county where I was living at that time, we went back to the primitive methods of bargain and barter.) This state of affairs is profoundly immoral. It obscures all distinctions between meum and tuum ; it makes honest men thieves against their will. Amongst a people who venerate evolution, and regard the word as a fetich, who inscribe upon their coins E Piuripus UNvM, this policy, if persisted in, will surely achieve degeneration and disinte- gration. That I am speaking within my brief, none will dispute who is familiar with the history of Banking in the West. We have, it is true, Bank Commis- sioners, who are paid by the people good salaries to Business Life 135 perform certain duties, involving a periodical ex- amination of the business done by the banks, a report upon their financial condition, and, if this be deemed unsatisfactory, certain powers plenipo- tentiary in regard to a change of management, or, in extreme cases, the suspension of payments. The laws upon this subject could hardly be bettered ; the administration of them has become a farce. The Commissioners are often ill-chosen; their work is too hastily done; they consider the feelings of the Board of Directors, whom they know personally, rather than the depositors ; and consciously or sub- consciously they conceal rather than reveal fraud. I used the word subconsciously advisedly. There is a sentiment in the West, underlying all conduct, which the Native Son fondly calls tolerance: a sentiment which wilfully blinds itself to things as they are, and prattles sweetly of things as they ought to be. In a country where the unforeseen nearly always happens, the Bank Commissioners doubtless justify themselves by predicting good whenever they are confronted by evil. Spero infestis should be taken as their motto. It is obvious that these gentlemen should be compelled to do their duty, or their office abolished. At pres- ent, they are a menace to the community, who, for the most part, have faith in them —a faith sorely tried of late. I know of cases when unhappy per- sons allowed all they possessed in the world to remain in the keeping of those whom the Bank Commissioners publicly proclaimed to be solvent and trustworthy, and who were proved shortly afterwards to be neither the one nor the other. 136 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope An anecdote illustrates the point of view of the Bank Commissioner. I can vouch for the truth of it. A man was indicted by the Grand Jury for embezzlement. At the trial it was abundantly shown that he had misappropriated money held in trust by him. But the verdict of the jury was Not Guilty. A friend of mine remonstrated with the foreman. “Oh, yes,” said that gentleman, “he took the money sure enough, but, you see, the poor devil did n’t take much.” Let us return to the Banks. Nearly all the wise men of the West are bankers, or connected with banks, because it is (or was) obvious to them that it is safer to play with other folks’ money than with your own. It seemed to these gentlemen, who possessed all the qualities necessary to suc- cess save second sight, that land had a certain definite value, a value easily to be determined by the experts in their employ. As a matter of fact, land, like any other commodity, is worth what it will fetch, neither more nor less. Accordingly, in defiance of the principles of banking, large sums were loaned upon real estate, sums tied up for a term of years. During the great boom, hardly a bank in the West refused money to its regular customers when the security of a first mortgage was offered in exchange, and so it came to pass that when the boom collapsed, when bad _ prices and dry years confronted the mortgagors, when principal and interest became overdue and delin- quent, hundreds of thousands of acres fell into the hands of the banks, who were in consequence forced to either sell them or farm them, both Business Life tan the sale and culture of land being lines of busi- ness which they were ill-qualified to undertake. The land in most cases came under the ham- mer, and was knocked down to the highest bidder at a price equivalent to perhaps one fourth of what the mortgagor had paid for it. This up- heaval of land values paralysed the best brains and energies in the West. Even those who had paid in full for their land, and owed no man any- thing, were terror-struck. An Englishman sud- denly told that the bag of sovereigns he had slowly collected during a life of labour and self- denial was nothing more than a bag of crown pieces would present an analogous case; and it does not require a vivid imagination to conceive what his feelings would be.. It is perfectly true that the fictitious value of most of the lands west of the Rocky Mountains was steadily maintained by those who were unable or unwilling to sell their properties, but none the less it was in the air that we were not upon terra firma at all, but encamped on shifting sands. “Honour” amongst business men is a delicate question to discuss, but one germane to this chap- ter. If you talk to capitalists in any of the European cities, they will be certain to impugn the Western sense of honour. These gentlemen draw odorous comparisons between their methods and ours. Judged by their standard, we fall short, — that is certain ; because in an old country it pays to be honest, whereas in a new country the Lord would seem to only help those who help them- 138 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope selves freely from other folks’ piles. The Chosen People are a concrete example of this, for they pilfer and prosper after a fashion quite impossible overseas. But I imagine that an impartial judge would pronounce the difference, ethically consid- ered, to be one ’twixt Tweedledum and Tweedledee. We have no “guinea-pig”’ system in the West; we are not hypocrites; we don’t take very much (com- pared with others); and what we do take is always published in the newspapers. If you read the “Times” diligently, you will come to the conclu- sion that a rich man can do no wrong; a Western editor will prove to you conclusively that a rich man can do no right. In “Aurora Leigh,” Mrs. Barrett Browning speaks of those who sit in easy chairs and damn the rows that stand. The Eng- lishman, snug in his easy chair, is given to cheap condemnation of those who stand, and that is why he is so beloved by the nations. When you have nearly all that the Gods can give, it is not difficult to be virtuous — as Becky Sharp observed. Of the many in business upon the Pacific Slope who are honest we hear nothing, which reminds me of a story. At the time of the last Presiden- tial election, when the claims of Free Silver were being generally exploited, the following was over- heard: “Where are the Gold men?” demanded a Popocrat, a street orator, who was holding forth to a crowd in sympathy with his dogmas, “ where are they? I don’t see them. I don’t hear them. Where are they?” After a pause a deep voice answered: “I’ll tell you where they are, they ‘re — at work.” Business Life 139 The live-and-let-live philosophy of the West is slowly changing its skin. Adversity has taught us to check our accounts. Not so very long ago a store-keeper found, after an annual stock-taking, that a saddle was missing. He instructed his book-keeper to charge all the customers who were cattle-men with one saddle. “Those,” he argued, “who have not bought a new saddle will protest.” The book-keeper obeyed instructions, but not a single bill was protested. Such laxity is no longer the rule, but the exception. In all big businesses, in the offices of the trans- portation companies, in the saloons and _ restau- rants, in the hotels and places of entertainment, you will observe automatic tills that register the sums paid, and make peculation upon the part of employés almost impossible. This ingenious machine has taught the employed to rely not upon what they can steal, but on what they can law- fully earn; as a factor in the ethical development of the working classes it is justly entitled to men- tion. Before it was introduced, employers, when estimating future profits, always deducted a cer- tain percentage for undiscovered thefts. At one time I employed a large gang of Chinamen to cut wood and cord it. They were cunning fellows, and their tricks were not easily detected. For instance, they would pile the wood on a side-hill, or around a stump, or the wood in the centre would be loosely corded, so that the tale of cords, when I, in my turn, scid the wood, would be short. . I measured the wood myself, but, despite my intimate knowl- edge of their heathen arts, I was regularly robbed. 140 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Finally, I deducted from the money due to them ten per cent, to cover fraud that had escaped my eye. They did not object to this tax, and my cook said that I was “heap smart, same as ’Melican man.” I commend this policy to all who employ Chinese wood-choppers. I went into active business in the year 1890, and the business — involving the sale and subdivision of large tracts of land—brought me at once into contact with many sorts and conditions of men: bankers, merchants, journalists, politicians, parsons, lawyers, and of course farmers. Our offices were open from nine to four to all comers, and anything that pertained to the development of the county or state was discussed freely and at length. The harvest moon of prosperity was just beginning to wane on the Pacific Slope, but land was still in good demand, and our correspondence was very large. Every scheme of importance, every enter- prise of moment, challenged our interest and atten- tion. To my father-in-law, the head of the firm, was entrusted also the management of a street railway and of a large hotel. An Investment and Development Company, of which I was secretary, and the members of a committee formed for the purchase of a right-of-way for a great railroad used to meet daily in our private room. I men- tion these things, that may perhaps be considered irrelevant, because it will be seen that being identi- fied with a firm which had done and was still doing an immense business, I had exceptional opportuni- ties of studying many phases of business life, and the characters of business men. Business Life 141 What impressed me most, I remember, was the fluid nature of the credit extended by capitalists to all willing to buy and improve land. Credit alone opened up the country and developed it. And credit established also a state of interdependence between man and man which brought in its train some curious results. Debtors, sensible that a golden fetter linked each and all of them to a common creditor, Capital, grew fearful of offending that creditor. Many excellent plans devised for the public weal, and for no other purpose, were nipped 7 the bud, because men could not be per- suaded to vote against the will of those to whom they were indebted. There is no such slavery as debt. From the debtor’s point of view, the very cardinal virtues must grovel in the dust before that false god — Policy. In the name of Policy every debtor’s knee must bow. As time passed, men began to chafe beneath their chains, to fret and fume in secret. Finally, the freemasonry of misery binding them together, they began to talk openly of rebellion and repudiation. Debt bred the Popocrat, the Silverite, the man who wanted something in exchange for nothing. Debt set class against class. Thus it will be seen that credit, percolating every- where like a river in flood, irrigating the waste places, making the desert to bloom and blossom, accomplished great good and great harm. But the harm is passing away, the good remains. A clever writer once said that if you wish to change a man’s character, you must change his point of view. The point of view of the Native Son has changed en- 142 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope tirely during the last decade. Plastic, quick-witted, eager to excel, with immense recuperative and re- constructive powers, he is not so reckless as of yore; he has learned humility; he is beginning to understand himself — and his limitations. The heart of the Native Son is in the right place, but his head has been cocked at a wrong angle. And you can forgive him much on account of his youth: he is not that detestable object —an old sinner. The business man of the West burns his candle at both ends. Asa youth, his recuperative power is immense; as he nears middle age, it dwindles and flickers till nothing but a spark is left. He never rests. As soon as breakfast is over, he hurries to his office and begins work at once; luncheon is bolted in ten minutes, food not easily digestible being chosen, then more work. His dinner hour finds him jaded, in no physical condition to eat and digest a large meal; yet you will see him consume half a dozen courses with an appetite sharpened perhaps by a cocktail or two. After dinner, does he keep quiet? Not he. The club, the theatre, or his everlasting work claim him. His busy brain responds to the stimulus of debate, or emotion, or greed: it grinds on and on, not even stopping when he crawls, spent and weary, between the sheets of his bed. An inscrutable Providence has given America the English tongue, a medium of speech unsuited to a people rather Gallic than Anglo-Saxon in their quickness of apprehension and power of articula- tion: that is why Americans talk French so much Business Life 143 better than we do—and English too for that matter. But a Volapuk of home manufacture would be better than either for a nation who has plenty to say and but little time to say it in. I remember giving a friend the name of my London tailor. When I saw my snip some months after, he thanked me for sending him a good customer, but he added: “He was a queer gentleman, sir.” I asked for an explanation. “He was in such a hurry, sir, that he would n’t try his clothes on.” That reminds me of another story. I had a large water scheme to submit to a New York capitalist. He told me that his time was so filled up it would be impos- sible to talk over the matter unless I would waive insular prejudice and discuss business at dinner. I dined with him, bringing maps and reports, and three times during that dinner he was disturbed by men wishing to see him! In apology, he observed that he was sailing to Europe on the following Wednesday, and that his engagements were “crowd- ing” him. “If you are going to England,” said I, “let us meet at my club in London, and go into this scheme thoroughly.” He stared at me and laughed. “Why did you not tell me that before?” he ex- claimed. “I have always a little leisure over there.” Then I demanded the name of his steam- ship. “I am not sure whether I shall sail on the ‘Teutonic’ or ‘St. Louis,” he replied. “As it is winter I can secure a berth on either at the last moment, and there is a difference of one hour and a half in the times of departure. An extra hour and a half in New York means many dollars to ”» me. 144 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope Truly does the Western poet sing : “‘T look in vain for traces of the fresh and fair and sweet In yellow, sunken faces that are drifting through the street ; Drifting on, drifting on, To the scrape of restless feet ; I can sorrow for the owners of the faces in the street.” It is interesting to contrast two faces often seen side by side in Western theatres and places of entertainment: the Anglo-Saxon and the Teuton. The German, stolid, phlegmatic, round, and rosy, has worked perhaps as hard as or even harder than the restless, keen-eyed, sallow-cheeked man at his side ; but now he is taking it easy. He does not chatter between the acts to his wife or fiancée; he absorbs the sights and sounds in front of him with evident gusto, but he gives nothing back. The Native Son, on the other hand, is giving rather than taking, he is entertaining his companion, instead of allowing the people on the stage todo so. The German goes to bed to sleep soundly till the mor- row; the Native Son lies awake for half the night, pursued by a Comus rout of vagabond thoughts. Again, ask the German what he reads. You will be surprised to find that a big fellow whom you have contemptuously stigmatised as a beer-swiller has read and assimilated the masterpieces of Goethe, Schiller, and Heine; he talks intelligently of the great historians and metaphysicians; he will tell you of the triumphs achieved by his fellow-country- men in pathology and therapeutics. But what will particularly strike you, is the man’s capacity for absorbing and retaining facts that may prove of Business Life 145 service to him in his trade or business; his mind is a storehouse, wherein may be found the food best adapted to support and prolong life. The Native Son’s mind, on the other hand, is a show- room full of “notions,” a heterogeneous collection, containing much that is quaint and ingenious and amusing, but little that is useful and enduring. If the Native Son has any respect for himself and his race, he must learn to husband his resources, instead of dissipating them. Systematic reading of what is best and most inspiring in our literature, careful attention to exercise and diet, rest and re- freshment alternating with work and fatigue, would regenerate the toilers of the West. 10 =f Mat. oe AES fey Mia Bis | Li y Rr yest ¥ Vill ANGLO-FRANCO-CALIFORNIANS eh ty iN PAA. An Te UNH) Thi a SH oe ety ry A I APA Val ea | iy i ap A, M f ; on ‘ AG At af) reuie 4 VIII ANGLO-FRANCO-CALIFORNIANS HAVE already spoken (figuratively) of a stone wall which the Anglo-Franco-Californians have built around themselves. Within that wall may be found a wonderful and exact presentment of European life: English men-servants, French cooks and dresses, décadent pictures, five o’clock tea, eight o'clock dinner, and what is inseparable from all these good things —ennwi. And yet a fly lurks within the ointment of their luxury: the sense that by the West they are regarded as a joke, an extravaganza. Within the stone wall is what Dis- raeli used to call the sustained splendour of a stately life; without sits Ridicule singing ribald songs. Of the many things English to which Americans have a right to strenuously object, nothing is more objectionable than the stone wall, whether it be concrete or abstract. In England it has definite meaning, a raison Wétre, but even in England it is an open question whether the stone wall has not kept out more than it kept in. In the West, the stone wall is an anachronism, more, an impertinence. I do not wish to be misunderstood. Life would be intolerable without a certain amount of privacy The exclusiveness that keeps an uncongenial neigh- pour at arm’s length is justifiable on the plea that 150 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope his tastes and habits differ from ours. It is not justifiable on the plea that we are intrinsically better. The Anglo-Franco-Californians are accused, perhaps unjustly, of posing as being better than the people who are not upon their visiting lists. Only Omniscience can determine so nice a question ; but if they claim to be better, the onus of proving it lies on them; when they have done so, it is probable that the people will cheerfully admit the supremacy. As Professor Peck pointed out, Colonel Roosevelt may be considered an aristocrat, because he has proved himself to be more patriotic, more unselfish, more courageous — better, in fine, than the average citizen. The Anglo-Franco-Californians have what few possess in the West, —the means and the leisure to do what they ought to do, the things that worka- day folks are sadly constrained to leave undone. Many of them soberly realise their opportunities and responsibilities. The spirit that impels Dives to cheerfully loan to exhibitions his pictures, and china, and plate, the spirit that drives him from his comfortable library into the Pandemonium of poli- tics, the spirit that makes him cheerfully endure the hardships and perils of a campaign, is his good angel; the spirit, on the other hand, that drives him to the uttermost parts of the world in search of what can only please or profit himself is his demon, no matter how angelically disguised. American readers will remember a certain fancy- dress ball given in New York, and the excitement it created. When an army of the “ unemployed” was marching to Washington, when times were Anglo-Franco-Californians 151 troublous all over the country, when it seemed to thoughtful men that the chain which links labour to capital was about to break, so fierce was the strain put upon it, one of the leaders of society issued invitations to a ball which was to bear the same relation to ordinary balls as the entertain- ments of Lucullus bore to the every day dinners of ancient Rome. As a matter of fact, the cost of this ball was absurdly exaggerated, but the prin- ciple is what concerns us. Much ink was spilt in setting forth the pros and cons of the case. It was shown that so far from the ball being an injury to the poor, the benefits accruing to them from the large sums of money put into active circulation amongst a score of industries would very measur- ably relieve a vast deal of distress. And yet the sentiment on both sides of the Atlantic set dead against what was termed the elevation of the Dollar. The Ball was a grievous blunder on the part of Capital, because lavish display during a season of want and suffering is and always will be cruelly inexpedient and inept. The Anglo-Franco-Californians have both added to and subtracted from the prejudice against things “English,” —a prejudice that nothing short of an awful war waged by the English-speaking peoples against the rest of the world will be strong enough to uproot and exterminate. Curiously enough there is no such prejudice against things French which are surely not above criticism. I remember a smart equipage that used to be seen daily at Del Monte some years ago. A Californian confessed to me 152 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope that he did not like it, because it was English. I explained to him that the whole thing, just as it stood, — horses, harness, and vehicle,— was not English at all but Austrian. He eyed me dubiously. Then he said: “ Well, it looks English any way.” The American nation borrowed our national air and set to it words of their own. It is now part and parcel of Uncle Sam’s dearest possessions, and many of his children fondly believe that Uncle Sam composed the music, just as many English peasants are convinced that the Bible was originally written in the vernacular. In the same spirit, English customs that formerly were eyed askance have been adopted and naturalised. When the first English drag rolled through the streets of San Francisco, the street arabs flung stones at it, regarding it as a symbol of what they abhorred: the stage-coach, so to speak, of Class Dis- tinction, whereon the few could be driven through life, exalted above the many. To-day there are many drags, and the gutter-snipes cheer as they roll by, freighted with youth and beauty, not be- cause their democratic principles have forsaken them, but because they realise that to them per- sonally the coach brings pleasure and profit, — the joy of beholding a perfectly appointed equipage ; the profit of reflecting that one day they too may sit in the seats of the mighty. I can remember when it was hardly prudent to walk abroad in breeches and leggings. The small boys, if they refrained from throwing stones, would pelt you with ironical remarks. “Give that feller the whole sidewalk —he needs it,” was a favourite Anglo-Franco-Californians 153 observation ; or, if you wore white polo unmention- ables, “Say, Mister, ain’t you forgot your pants ?” Anything, in fine, that differed ever so slightly from what they, as Californians, were accustomed to, provoked ridicule and displeasure. Servants in livery (the livery being regarded as a badge of servitude), dog-carts, ponies with hogged manes and bang-tails, knickerbockers, English saddles and harness, and the like, were absolutely hateful to them during the ’80’s. To-day, these prejudices are evaporating. Indeed, the pendulum is swing- ing far the other way. I remember being asked to a luncheon given at the Burlingame Country Club in honour of some distinguished New York- ers who had acted as judges at the San Francisco Horse Show. We drove down to the Country Club upon coaches belonging to members, and I, the Englishman (the only Englishman, so far as I can recollect), out of all that large party wore the ordinary clothes of the American citizen. The others were attired in the latest sporting fashion. Nor did their garments provoke criticism from the foot-passengers. And yet, not half a dozen years before, curiosity taking me to a revival meeting, I had been publicly apostrophised by the gentle- man (white) who conducted the proceedings. It happened that I had been in the saddle all day, and was wearing an old check shooting coat and a pair of well-worn breeches. I seated myself upon the bench farthest from the preacher, and was rather astonished to find myself an object lesson to the assembly. “There sits one,’ ex- claimed the revivalist, pointing a finger of scorn 154 Life and Sport on the Pacific Slope at my coat, “who toils not, neither does he spin. And Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like unto him.” This was so obvious to the meanest understanding that the speaker’s assurance seemed superfluous. I know now that he was protesting against a costume that, in a sense, distinguishes the man who rides from the man who walks. The same spirit inspired another gentleman of humour and imagination to enroll himself in a hotel register as “John Jones, and valise,’ merely because the last entry immediately above his ran: “Thomas Smith —and valet.” I mentioned just now the Burlingame Country Club. The history of that club has, I think, peculiar interest, because it is the epitome, the substantial sum and substance of what the Anglo- Franco-Californians have accomplished in a single decade. In its way it is unique, because it does encompass and manifest so much that is good in contemporary French, English, and American life. Such as it is, moreover, it must be seriously reckoned with as a factor in the development of the Pacific Slope. It has passed the experimental stage; it stands upon a firm social and financial basis; it has withstood ridicule, envy, and internal dissension. The word club will mislead English readers, for the Burlingame is not, as Hurlingham or Ranelagh, a mere place of amusement, but a colony where people live—some of them all the year round —a colony of persons who have tacitly agreed to obtain, regardless of cost, the comforts of life, and to rigorously exclude the mean, the sordid, and the common. Burlingame is a model village Anglo-Franco-Californians res of the rich. Nature has done much for the place; art has done more. It lies upon the park-like foot- hills that slope gently to the Bay of San Francisco. In the wooded cafions and gulches may be found the “cottages” of the members, houses built for the most part for comfort rather than show; houses with broad and deep verandahs, with large living rooms, with cosy corners. Within, you will mark no silken and velvet hangings, but the freshest of chintzes, the most exquisite linen, that simplicity, in short, which is so delightful and so costly. Here the women wear the plainest clothes, while the male gladly lays aside his cut-throat collar and assumes instead the soft and becoming stock. But stock and skirt must be cut by an artist. The hypercritic at Burlingame might complain that art had just failed to conceal art. The négligé is too studied. But the whole is amazing. You have polo, tennis, golf, pigeon shooting, bathing, boating, and a score of minor amusements to distract your leisure. You can hire from the club stables a well-appointed four-in-hand, a tandem, even an Irish jaunting car, at a price considerably less than you would pay in London. You have all the advantages of country life in France or Eng- land.