ea A} Ath lhe -~Z Pie ) [Jus | het = \ THE EOWEHE SILURIAN LAMELLIBRANCHIATA MINNESOTA By E. O. ULRICH [FROM VOL. III OF THE FINAL REPORT OF THE GEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY OF MINNESU'T are sh ts Se x” =F * * it QGHAPTHR VI. LIBRARIES THE LOWER SILURIAN LAMELLIBRANCHIATA OF MINNESOTA. BY E. O. ULRICH. A number of names for this class of mollusks, commonly known as mussels, have, from time to time, been proposed, but none of them, save Blainville’s Lamelli- branchiata, which, on the whole, is an appropriate designation, has enjoyed more than merely temporary popularity. Of the other names, that proposed by Goldfuss in 1820, Pelecypoda, alone presents fair claims to recognition, since its adoption would produce that most desirable element, uniformity, in the terminology of the various classes comprised in the subkingdom Mollusca. Blainville’s name, however, has six years’ priority, and is so well established in literature that it is doubtful if the con- fusion which would result from a change of names would be sufficiently compensated for by the superior advantages of Goldfuss’ term. The Lamellibranchiata agree with the Brachiopoda in having bivalved shells, but differ in having them, as a rule, equal and inequilateral instead of inequivalved and equilateral; they are, furthermore, placed on the sides of the animal (for which reason we distinguish them as right and /eft), instead of above (dorsal) and below (ventral). From the Gastropoda and Cephalopoda they are distinguished by wanting a distinct head, in having bivalved shells, a bilobed mantle and lamelliform gills developed in pairs. Generally the animal is symmetrically developed, of oval, rounded or trans- versely elongate form, laterally compressed and enclosed in the two fleshy, often more or less united, lobes of the mantle. Within the latter, which are attached to and secrete the calcareous or perlaceous valves, we have first the lamelliform gills, and between these the various internal organs, such as the heart, intestines and organs of generation, and the mouth and anal opening, and usually also a protrusible muscular foot. Numerous modifications of the mantle lobes occur. Sometimes they are separate, at other times their margins are grown together so as to enclose the animal as in a sack. In the latter case an opening is left in front for the protrusion [475] 476 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Lamellibranchiata. of the foot, and another in the back serving for beth the inhalation of water and the expulsion of the excrements. The posterior opening may be further modified so as to form two more or less distinct tubes or siphons, and these may be retractible or of such size and consistency that they project permanently through the gaping posterior margin of the shell. In most instances the siphons are capable of being completely or partially retracted, and the line of attachment of the muscles of the mantle producing this retraction is bent inward more or less decidedly. When such an inbending of the pallial line (as the attachment of the mantle to the inner surface of the shell is called) is found in fossil shells the inference is regarded as conclusive that the animal possessed retractile siphons. When, on the other hand, the pallial line is simple (7. e., without a sinus) we are obliged to conclude that the siphons were either very small or wanting entirely. The foot—a perfectly retractile organ, presumably of locomotion—lies in the anterior part of the shell between the gills and mantle lobes. Its form is various, but commonly compressed, hatchet or club-shaped, and the muscles which produce and regulate its action are attached usually above or behind the anterior adductor. Not infrequently chitinous threads spring from the lower side of the foot. When these are developed in sufficient number to form a bundle or byssus, the shells may thereby attach themselves to foreign bodies, and in such cases the anterior margins of the valves do not close tightly, but leave what is known as the byssal opening. Among paleozoic representatives of this class the Ambonychiide afford the best instances of shells with a byssal opening. Of all the organs of the animal none are of greater importance to the paleon- tologist than the strong muscles (adductors) which serve to close the valves. There may be only one, the posterior, as in the recent oyster, or of the two the anterior one may be disproportionately small. In the majority of cases, however, the two muscles are approximately of equal size. Other and much smaller muscular scars may be noticed, especially in the umbonal cavity. which were produced by muscles which partially supported the movements of the gills and palpi and, as already stated, of the foot. The shell in which the interest of the paleontologist is chiefly centered consists largely of two layers, the outer, secreted by the thickened margin of the mantle, being composed of vertically arranged prismatic cells filled with calcite, the inner of structureless thin parallel leaves. Generally a delicate chitinous epidermis is spread over the cellulose layer. Growth of the valves begins at the apex or beak, a more or less prominent point situated almost invariably somewhere along the anterior half of the hinge margin. Further increase takes place principally at the periphery, producing, when the edges of the mantle are entire, a simple, more or less regularly BRACHIOPODA. 477 Terminology.] concentric, striation (growth lines) of the surface. But when the mantle edges are undulating or dentate the concentric growth lines are crossed by radiating striz or plications. The various parts of the shell are conveniently brought out and illustrated in the following section on terminology. TERMINOLOGY. Outline: The designation of the various parts of the outline depends upon the position in which the shell is placed. I shall adopt, because it is certainly the most convenient if not always the most natural position, the one in which the beaks are placed uppermost and the hinge line nearly or quite horizontal. The part in front of the beaks, toward which they are usually inclined, is therefore considered as the anterior end, while that behind them, often much the largest and widest, is the posterior. The upper edge is known as the cardinal or dorsal margin, while the lower is called the basal or ventral. Dimensions: The length as given in the following pages always expresses the distance between the most prominent points (extremities) on the anterior and posterior Fig. 35. I and II, right valves of IscHYRODONTA (?) OVALIS Ulrich and MATHERIA RUGOSA Ulrich, lettered and divided by lines to illustrate the section on outline and dimensions. A-—B, length; C-D, anterior hight; E-F, posterior hight; a 6, dorsal or cardinal margin: e d, anterior end and margin; e f, basal or ventral margin; g h, posterior end and margin. III, antero-cardinal view of a small specimen of Cuneamya curta Whitfield, from the upper part of the Cincinnati group of Ohio; uw, umbones and beginning of umbonal ridges; e, escutcheon; /, lunule. IV, the two valves of an undescribed species of Orthodesma lying open in the shale and showing the ligament at 7; middle beds of the Cincinnati group at Cincinnati. ¢_.,,. Pe V, dorsal view of an entire cast of the interior of Chenodomers typrcnies, a new genus and species from the upper beds of the Cincinnati group of Ohio, showing a shell gaping at both ends. VI, anterior view of Byssonychia radiata (Ambonychia radiata Hall), illustrating a shell with a byssal Opening. This specimen is from Cincinnati, Ohio, and is peculiar in having the right valve (left side of figure) preserved as a cast of the exterior and the left valve as a cast of the interior. In the latter is shown the pallial line (at p) running along the anterior side to a point under the beak. 478 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. {Termiology. margins. This line may be parallel with the hinge, but more commonly diverges more or less strongly posteriorly. The hight is given in one or two measurements; the former, when the shell is approximately equilateral (as in many species of Tellinomya) or elliptical in form (Clidophorus) with the greatest hight subcentral or beneath the beaks; the latter, when the shell is elongate or has one end much wider than the other (Orthodesma and Modiolopsis). “In such cases two lines are drawn at right angles with the hinge line, one from the beaks to the ventral margin, the interval between the two points being the anterior hight, the other across the posterior end, from the posterior extremity of the hinge, giving the posterior hight. By thickness is understood the shortest distance between the points of greatest convexity of the valves. Area or Escutcheon: A variously shaped, usually elongate, inflection of the dorsal edge, generally longitudinally lineate, and serving as a receptacle for the ligament. When the area is restricted to posterior to the beaks, as in _ Cuneamya, it is, strictly speaking, to be called an escutcheon. Inunule: A similar, but shorter and commonly heart-shaped inflection or distin- guishable area in front of or beneath the beaks. Cuneamya offers good examples, Gaping and closed shells: The valves fit either closely all around or they may fail to do so and gape at one or both ends, and sometimes ventrally. Byssal opening: A small, distinctly modified portion of the. anterior margin, through which the byssus protruded. Among the paleozoic types the Ambonychiide furnish the best examples. Beak: A more or less prominent point on each valve, usually bending forward and overhanging, in a variable degree, the dorsal edge. It marks the point at which growth began, and generally is situated anterior to the center of the valves. Many species of Te/linomya, Nucula and Clinopistha afford exceptions to the last rule. Umbones: The use of this term, which is generally applied in a sense synonymous with beaks, is here restricted to the gibbous rostral portion of valves in which - the beaks are incurved over the hinge line and invisible in a side view. Umbonal ridge: A more or less strongly rounded or angular ridge-like prominence, extending from the beaks or umbones toward the posterior extremity of the shell. Example, Whitella. Cardinal or dorsal slope: Generally applies to the flattened or concave declivity from the umbonal ridge to the dorsal edge posterior to the beaks, When the declivity on the anterior side is sufficient to be noted it is designated. as the anterior cardinal slope. BRACHIOPODA. 479 Terminology.) Anterior, posterior and ventral slopes are self-explanatory terms. External ligament: An elastic, horny band, of variable length, serving to hold the valves in position, and situated invariably over the dorsal edges close behind or under the beaks. But rarely preserved in fossil shells. Internal ligament or cartilage: This is generally of cartilaginous consistency, and often but a modification or extension of the external ligament. In the latter case it lies along the posterior inner border of the hinge, where its presence may be indicated by linear thickened supports which, in casts of the interior, may sometimes be confounded with impressions of lateral teeth, (Whitella). A true internal cartilage, usually occupying a small pit beneath the beaks (Fig. 36, III and VID), is found in Nueula, Pecten and many other types of the secondary and more recent rocks, but is rather rare among paleozoic species. Fig. 36. Illustrating Hinge Types, Muscles and Pallial Impressions. land II, interior of a right valve of Lyrodesma major Ulrich, of the natural size, and the rostral portion of the valve x 2; upper beds of the Cincinnati group of Ohio. III, hinge of a species of Nuculana, showing internal cartilage pit atc. IV, interior of a left valve of Vanuxemia hayniana Safford, sp., from the upper Trenton limestone of central Kentucky; a, area; c. t., cardinal teeth; J. ¢t., posterior lateral teeth; a. a., anterior adductor, and p. 4., posterior adductor impression: p., pallial line. era Ubich V, cast of the interior of a left valve of an-ennamed—variety-of Byssonychia radiata-Hel, sp. (Ambonychia bellistriata Miller and others, not Hall, 1847,) from the lower beds of the Cincinnati group of Ohio. In this specimen the posterior adductor impression (p. a.) and the pallial line are,usually distinct. VI, a sharply defined cast of the interior of Lyrodesma major Ulrich (see also I and II), showing the muscular impressions in a very satisfactory manner; a. a., anterior adductors; p. a., posterior adductors; p. m., two pairs of pedal muscles. VII, interior of a shell with a strongly sinuate pallial line (s), and an internal ligament pit (c); Lutraria elliptica Roissy, Pliocene, Rhodus (one-half nat. size). The outline of this shell is to be noted in connection with Fig. 34, I and II. k VIII, undetermined species of Clidoporus, showing clavicle (cl. ). Hinge teeth: This term applies to the teeth in general, but more especially when these are numerous and subequal, as in “T’e/linomya. 480 THE PALEON'TOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. [Preservation and methods of study. Cardinal teeth: Refers to the teeth situated on the hinge in the region of the beaks. Lateral teeth: One or more, generally elongate, subhorizontal teeth or interlocking ridges, often situated at the posterior extremity of the hinge.’ Muscular impressions: That of the anterior adductor, when present, is situated near the margin in the antero-cardinal region. It may be as large or much smaller than the posterior adductor, which, when both are present, is placed at some point in the postero-cardinal region. When only one adductor scar > is present (Monomyaria), or the anterior one is much the smaller of the two (Heteromyaria), the posterior scar is situated nearer the center of the valve. Umbonal scars are small impressions in the umbonal cavity, while the pedal muscles often leave small scars above and behind the anterior adductor impressions. Pallial line: This is a more or less sharply defined line running nearly parallel with the free margins of the valves and connecting the two adductor scars. Among paleozoic representatives of the class the line is usually simple, but among more recent forms a sinuate pallial line (said of it when its posterior part is bent more or less strongly inward), is quite common. Clavicle: A thin plate or ridge in each valve, of varying length, extending from the hinge margin, immediately in front of the beaks, vertically downward, or curving slightly forward. Example, Clidophorus. PRESERVATION AND Merruops or Srupy. In common with the Gastropoda, and probably for the same reasons, the paleo- zoic Lamellibranchiata are oftenest found in the condition of casts of the interior. This is true, especially of specimens preserved in dolomitic limestones like those of the lower Trenton and Galena in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Illinois, and the Niagara of northern Illinois and Wisconsin. These dolomitic specimens are to be regarded as in a favorable state of preservation so far as study is concerned. The shell, though dissolved away, has left good moulds of both the exterior and interior in the matrix, so that with the aid of plastic gutta percha the student is enabled to produce counterfeits of the shell that for purposes of classfication are scarcely to be excelled. To make good impressions it is often necessary to clean the moulds of the small crystals and other foreign matter that may in part occupy the space originally filled by the shell. Unfortunately, collectors too often are careless in preserving the outer mould, believing it, perhaps, of little consequence. In the interests of paleon- tology I would recommend greater caution and a lessening of the number of frag- ments by an early application of the contents of the glue pot. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 481 Preservation and methods of study. Good casts of the interior are also to be met with in shaly rocks, indeed, most excellent ones when the shales are arenaceous. In soft shales, like those of the Cincinnati group of Ohio, they are generally preserved as partial moulds of the exterior. The approximately unaltered shell is to be counted as rare in lower paleozoic formations when compared with their frequent occurrence in Carbonif- erous deposits. The most favorable method of preservation, so far as Lower Silurian material is concerned, is that in which the originally calcareous shell is more or less completely replaced by silica. Such specimens are rare in the Northwest, but common in the solid limestones of the Trenton in Tennessee and Kentucky, and in the Black River limestone of Canada. Beautiful specimens of this kind are to be found weathered out, or blocks of the limestone may be treated with dilute acid with the same result. The first essential in the study of fossil Lamellibranchiata is to determine whether or not the material, as it lies before us, has retained its original form. Distortion through pressure in the rock matrix is a most fruitful source of error and one that even the greatest experience cannot entirely negative. It is evident that the softer and, consequently, the more yielding the character of the matrix, the greater the degree of the distortion. It is least in limestones and dolomites and greatest in shales and slates. The direction of the distortion depends upon the position occupied by the shell with respect to the bed planes of the enclosing rock. Fig. 37. Illustrating distortion of shells through pressure. a, right side of a specimen of Modiolopsis modiolaris Conrad, the hight of which has been reduced, as Shown in outline, to less than half what it was originally. b, a shell of the same species greatly compressed lengthwise. c, the shell of an undescribed species of Cuneamya, from Ohio, illustrating the effect of pressure on shells occupying an oblique position in the shales. The line s-b indicates the plane of the strata and sea bottom. (See fig. 38.) The exceedingly diverse results of the pressure, especially in specimens from shale, are most puzzling to the beginner. Ifa shell happened to stand upon end, its length -31 482 THE PALEON'TOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. [Preservation and methods of study. will be greatly reduced; if upon its base, the hight; if upon its side, the thickness. When these positions were in no wise oblique, the beginner may fail entirely to notice the distortion, which, when their position in the strata is oblique to the plane of deposit, will be more or less clearly obvious to him because of the unsymmetrical forms of the two valves. A careful examination. however, will reveal, at any rate on specimens that have not been much weathered, certain fine parallel lines on the sides of the crushed shell. These lines are coincident with and probably produced by the deposit lamin of the matrix, and an experienced student may, with their aid, at once determine the direction and perhaps the amount of the reduction of the par- ticular dimension affected. It is to be remembered that the pressure under which the fossils suffer acts, except in comparatively rare instances, in a vertical direction only. Complete shells are generally compressed more or less obliquely, for the simple reason that after the death of the animal the natural position of the shell, with respect to the plane of the sea bottom, must be approximately as shown in fig. 37, ¢. For the same natural cause, the disunited valves are better calculated to preserve the original outline, because they are most likely to le upon their inner edges, the latter being, therefore, at right angles to the direction of the pressure; in which case, under ordinary circumstances, the only dimension that can be altered is the thickness, this being reduced according to the amount of compression sustained by the surrounding rock. =iee we Fig. 38. Illustrating how to obtain a restoration of an obliquely compressed shell. The inner ontline represents the specimen as it is now (see fig. 36-c), the outer one a restoration of its original form, S-B. plane of sea bottom; d.—p., direction of compressing?force. In making the restoration shown in fig. 38, only the two regions or points a and b can be assumed as having retained their positions on the original boundary, because there alone the outline of the shell coincides with the direction of the com- pressing force. The only effect the latter could have had upon them was to increase their convexity and to press them down slightly beneath their original positions. On all other points, however, the effect was a reduction in the convexity of the BR ey reise eae LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 453 outline and consequently of the size of the specimen. The rostral region of the right valve was greatly reduced and flattened, that of the left not so much reduced and made more strongly convex at a. In the lower half of the shell the result of distortion was reversed in the two valves. In the restoration, assuming the two valves to have been equal, we draw a curve through the point a that is intermediate in convexity between the flattened curve of the rostral half of the right valve and the sharpened one of the left. An equivalent curve is then drawn for the right valve and then continued to and beyond the point 4. We now have the original outline of one of the valves as it would appear in an end view. The outline of the other valve being equally curved, only in an opposite direction, is then easily finished. Having satisfied ourselves as to the original shape of the shell, it is first desirable to determine whether the valves are equal, as In Modiolopsis and Whitella, or unequal, as in Pterinea and Aristerella. Next we note the relation of the various parts of the outline to each other, the relative width of the two ends and other features bearing upon the determination of the contour. Now the position, altitude and degree of fulness of the beaks and umbones is taken into account. The former may be terminal (i. e., situated at the anterior extremity of the hinge line and projecting as far forward as the margin beneath them), as in Ambonychia; or they may be nearly central in position, as in some species of Ctenodonta. Then the umbones may be strongly gibbous and the beaks curve over the hinge line (Cuneamya, Whitella), or they may be less full and comparatively erect (Clionychia), or depressed, or scarcely distinguish- able (Cycloconcha and Clidophorus). Decided deviations in the position and altitude of the beaks are generally of generic value, but lesser modifications are likely to prove of merely specific importance. The character of the surface markings will probably have been taken into account at once. In the next order, and here we usually credit them with generic and greater value, the student should observe the presence or absence of a byssal opening, of the lunule and escutcheon, and the character of the area. He should note also whether the edges of the valves fit tightly or gape at one or both ends or ventrally. His next step is to observe the position, distinctness and relative size of the various muscular impressions, the adductors particularly. Nor is he to forget to trace out the pallial line. Next he may find internal sockets, plates or ridges, that supported internal ligaments, or to which muscles were attached. Finally, he will observe the method of hingement. The hinge may be edentulous, in which case an external ligament (perhaps internal also) may usually be assumed if not found (see fig. 35, IV). In Modiolopsis there may be a slight thickening or rudimentary cardinal tooth in each 484 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Classification valve beneath the beaks, in Matheria there are two in the left and one in the right, in Cypricardites three or more, and these are added to by the development of lateral teeth (fig. 36, [V); some types may have radiating teeth (fig. 36, I and II); in others the whole hinge margin will be divided transversely into numerous small teeth, while still others may present a combination of short transverse and long lateral teeth. On the whole, after giving due consideration to other pecularities, modifications in the structure of the hinge are to be ranked as of the highest importance. CLASSIFICATION. Z The class Lamellibrachiata, or Pelecypoda, is variously divided by authorities. It is neither necessary nor desirable that the numerous systems should be considered here, since it is my impression, and here I merely follow the opinions of some of our latest and highest authorities, that they are all more or less misleading and inade- quate. The fact is, we have not yet arrived at that stage in knowledge where a really natural classification is possible. Too little of the paleozoic representatives of the class is known well, and until more is learned of the evolution of the recent types from their fossil ancestors no attempt is likely to prove more than provisional. What we want now are facts and when sufficient of them have accumulated I doubt not the desired natural scheme of classification will evolve itself. Still, since we have systems, they may as well be used till something better is furnished. Of course, only paleozoic types are here considered, and in viewing these alone, I cannot say that I am satisfied with the following arrangement. In drawing it up I have paid due attention to the arrangements proposed by Tryon, Stoliczka, Zittel, S. A. Miller and others, and sought to avoid what has seemed objectionable in each. At best the result is premature, and in submitting it in the hope that it may prove a little nearer the truth than their schemes, I beg that it may be considered with lenity. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 485 Classification of paleozoic Lamellibranchiata.] CLASSIFICATION OF PALEOZOIC LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. Subkingdom MOTmUSG A: cass LAMELLIBRANCHIATA, Biainvite. order ASTPHONIDA, wWooawara. Mantle lobes separate, siphons wanting. Pallial line without sinus. Suborder MONOMYARIA. A single adductor muscle, the anterior one wanting. Family PECTENIDA#, Lamarck. GENERA: Aviculopecten, McCoy; Crenipecten, Hall; Euchondria, Meek; Lyriopecten, Halil; Pernopecten, Winchell; Pterinopecten, Hall; Streblopteria, McCoy. Suborder HETEROMY ARIA. Anterior adductor muscle very small, the posterior one large. Family AVICULIDAS, dOrbigny. GENERA: Actinopteria, Hall; Bakevellia, King; Ectenodesma, Hall; Glyptodesma, Hall; Liopteria, Hall; Leptodesma, Hall; Limoptera, Hall; Monoptera, Meek and Worthen; Monotis, Bronn; ? Paleopinna, Hall; Posidonomya, Bronn; Pseudomonotis, Beyrich; Pterinea, Goldfuss ( Ver- tumia, Hall); Pteronitella, Billings; Pteronites, McCoy; ? Ptychopteria, Hall. Family PINNIDA®, Gray. GENERA: Aviculopinna, Meck; Pinna, Linne. Family AMBONYCHIIDA#, Miller. GENERA: Allonychia, Ulrich; Ambonychia, Hall (restricted); Amphicelia, Hall; Anomalodonta, Miller; Anoptera, Ulrich; Byssonychia, Ulrich; Byssopteria, Hall; Clionychia, Ulrich ; Eetéfoptera,,. Ulrich; Fridonychia, Ulrich; Mytilarea, Hall; Paleocardia, Hall; Plethomytilus, Hall. Psilonychia, Ulrich. Family CHASNOCARDIID AS, Miller. GENERA: Chenocardia, Meek and Worthen; Megambonia, Hall. Family MYTILIDA®S, Lamarck. GENERA: ? Anthracomya, Salter; ? Anthracoptera, Salter; Gosselettia, Barrois; Lithodomus, Cuvier ( Litho- phaga, Bolton); Modiella, Hall; Modiola, Lamarck ; Myalina, Koninck; Mytilops, Hall; 2 Spathella, Hall. ~ Family MODIOLOPSID/4, Ulrich. UShilincr GENERA: Actinomya, Ulrich; ? Aristerelld, Ulrich; Colpomya, Ulrich; ? Cymatonota, Ulrich; ? Cypricardella, Hall; ? Endodesma, Ulrich ; Eurymya, Ulrich; Goniophora, Phillips; Modioledon, /Ulrich ; Modiolopsis, Hall; Modiomorpha, Wall; Orthodesma, Hall and Whittield; ? Prolobella, Ulrich; ? Psiloconcha, Ulrich; ? Pyanomya, Miller. ope 486 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Classification of paleozoic Lamellibranchiata. Family CYPRICARDINIID, (Provisional.) GENUS: Cypricardinia, Hall. Family CYRTODONTID A, Ulrich. GENERA: ? Cypricardites, Conrad; Cyrtodonta, Billings; Ischyrodonta, Ulrich; Matheria, Billings; Orlonella, Ulrich. ? Ptychodesma, Hall; Vanuxemia, billings; Whitella, Ulrich. Suborder HOMOMY ARIA. Mantle lobes either separate or united posteriorly. The two adductor muscles of nearly equal strength. Family ARCIDAS, Lamarck. GENERA: Carbonarca, Meek and Worthen; Macrodon, Lycett; Nyassa, Hall; ? Spenotus, Hall. Family PARARCIDA, (Provisional). GENERA: Cardiola, Broderip; Cardiopsis, Meek and Worthen; Dewiobia, Winchell; Glyptocardia, Hall; Lunulicardium, Minster; Orecardium, Herrick; Panenka, Barrande; Paracardium, Hall; Pararca, Hall. Family NUCULIDAS, Gray. GENERA: ? Clidophorus, Hall; Ctenodonta, Salter (Tellinomya, Hall ); Goniodon, Herrick; Nucula, Lam- arck; Nuculana, Link; Nuculites, Conrad; Palceoneilo, Hall; ? Pyrenomeeus, Hall; Yoldia, Moller. Family LYRODESMIDAS, Ulrich. GENERA: Adodesma, Ulrich;—Ischyrina,Billings;—Lyrodesma, Conrad; Lechnophorus, Miller> Bam, Seehnophortoar Wetlee Family TRIGONIDA4, Lamarck. GENERA: ? Cytherodon, Hall; ? Schizodus, King. Family UNIONID AS GENERA: ? Amnigenia, Hall; ? Anthracosia, King; Prisconaia, Conrad. Family ELYMELLIDA), (Provisional). GENERA: Elymella, Hall; Glossites, Hall. Order SIPHONIDA, Woodward. Mantle lobes more or less united; siphons of varying lengths, either separate or united, are developed; both adductor muscles well developed. Family SOLENOMYID/AS, Gray. GENERA: Solenomya, Lamarck; Clinopistha, Meek and Worthen; Phthonia, Hall. Family SANGUINOLITIDAS, Miller. IENERA: Promacrus, Meek; Sanguinolites, McCoy. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 487 Classification of paleozoic Lamellibranchiata.] Family PHOLADELLIDA®, Miller. GENERA: Allorisma, King; Chenomya, Meek and Worthen; Cimitaria, Hall; Pholadella, Hall; Physe- tomya, Ulrich; Rhytimya, Ulrich. Family GRAMMYSIID As, Hall. GENERA: Cuneamya, Hall and Whitfield; Grammysia, De Verneuil; ? Leptodomus, McCoy; ? Sedgwickia, McCoy; ? Sphenoliwm, Miller; Saffordia, Ulrich. Family ASTARTIDA®. Gray. GENUS: Astartella, Hall. Family MEGALODONTIDA®. Zittel. GENERA: Megalodon, Sowerby; Megalomus, Hall: ? Plethocardia, Ulrich. Family LUCINIDA®, Deshayes. GENUS: Paracyclas, Hall. . Family CYCLOCONCHID%, (Provisional). GENERA: Cycloconcha, Miller; ? Anodontopsis, McCoy. @+leeledsn ay Ulrich. Family CONOCARDIID 4S, Miller. GENERA: Conocardium, Brown: ? EFopteria, Billings: Euchasma, Billings. Family CARDIOMORPHID AS, Miller. GENERA: Cardiomorpha, Koninck; Edmondia, Koninck; Vuthydesma, Hall; Protomya, Hall. Family SOLENIDAS, Adams. GENUS: Solenopsis, McCoy; Palcosolen, Mall; ? Orthoncta, Conrad. Family PALATANATINID/®, Miller. GENERA: TIlionia, Billings; Palwanatina, Hall; Prorhynchus, Hall. Family PROTHYRIDA®, Hall. GrENus: Prothyris, Meek. The literature pertaining to Lower Silurian Lamellibranchiata is not only meager but, in great part, unreliable. The principal cause for the latter is to be found in the want of experience of the authors, who, failing to understand the effects of pressure to which a large proportion of the shells have been subjected, have thrown together as identical widely different forms, and oftener, perhaps, distinguished the distorted specimens from those which have more nearly retained the normal form. The illustrations also are too often, if not entirely worthless, misleading. Here, more than in any other part of the study, the greatest care and experience are required. Entire and undistorted specimens are not by any means the rule, so that slight 488 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Classification of paleozoic Lamellibranchiata. restorations of the outline, if the figures are to be of real assistance in the identifi- cation of the species, are generally not only desirable but necessary. An absolutely correct reproduction of an imperfect specimen might be quite sufficient for the trained specialist, but not for the beginner. He requires all we can give him, and I know from experience that an approximation even to an “absolutely correct repro- duction” is anything but common among illustrations of early Lamellibranchiata. In the accompanying plates nearly all the specimens are represented as entire, but in each instance the fact of the restoration is mentioned or indicated by a fracture-like line. Respecting the drawings, I shall say only that they were in every case made by myself and with as great care and fidelity to nature as I could command. The synonomy of the species is scarcely as complete as I could wish, but as the volume must be kept within certain limits, and because it is in many instances at least doubtful that current identifications of the old species are really the same as the originals, I have restricted the synonomy to the citation of the first work con- taining a description and such of subsequent memoirs as added materially to our knowledge of the objects under consideration. Desiring also to save as much space as possible for general remarks, I have generally avoided what seemed unnecessary repetition by giving full descriptions of the principal species only. In characterizing the others I have depended chiefly upon comparisons, which, if they are complete, I hold to be more useful than bare descriptions. While the greater part of the northwestern material used was collected by myself, and is now part of my private cabinet, about one-fourth of the whole belongs to the survey museum, for which, as is shown by the museum register, the specimens were collected chiefly by Prof. N. H. Winchell, Prof. C. L. Herrick, and Messrs. W. H. Scofield and Charles Schuchert. For much of the remainder I am personally indebted to Mr. Scofield, who, with unusual generosity, allowed me to select anything I desired from his extensive private collection of Minnesota fossils. I am under obligations also to Dr. C. H. Robbins, of Wykoff, Min- nesota, for several choice specimens from the Galena limestone of Fillmore county; likewise to Prof. C. W. Hall, Mr. A. D. Meeds and Mr. A. H. Elftman for good specimens collected by them in the vicinity of Minneapolis. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. . 489 Lamellibranchiata.] Class LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. ( PELECYPODA.) Family AMBONYCHIID, Miller. Valves equal, very inequilateral; beaks prominent, terminal or nearly so; posterior cardinal region more or less alate; anterior side abruptly convex, with or without a byssal opening. Small cardinal and elongate posterior lateral teeth may be present or wanting. Posterior adductor impression large, bilobed (the upper part probably formed by a pedal muscle), situated above and behind the center of the valves. Anterior adductor wanting or very small, situated in the umbonal region. Pallial line simple, strongly impressed in the anterior region, becoming obsolete near the anterior extremity of the hinge. This family is unquestionably a valid one, and readily distinguished from the Aviculide with which its old genera are usually associated. In that family of shells the valves are always unequal and drawn out in front of the beaks into a distinct wing or lobe. The Ambonychiida, on the contrary, are always equivalved and with- out an anterior wing, the situation of the beaks being approximately terminal. As may be seen from the scheme of classification on page 485, I have extended the limits of the family so as to include several genera that are very differently arranged by other authors. Thus Amphicelia, Hall, is regarded as the type of a new family by Miller, while Whitfield has said that the genus is probably identical with Leptodomus, McCoy, and Meek and Worthen placed it near Pterinea. But, as I shall show in another work, Amphicwlia possesses every essential character of the present family. Palwocardia, likewise founded by Hall upon a Niagara species, also is closely related to Ambonychia. Hall’s Mytilarca and Plethomytilus again, can be shown, I believe, to be direct descendants of Lower Silurian types of this family and should not be placed with the Mytilide. Genus AMBONYCHIA, Hall (emend. Ulrich). Ambonychia (part.), HALL. 1847. Pal. N. Y., vol. i, p. 163. Not Ambonychia, Hali, 1859, Pal. N. Y., vol, iii, pp. 269 and 523; nor of American and European authors generally. Equivalved and profoundly inequilateral shells; valves ventricose, very thin, closing tightly all around; beaks full, strongly incurved. Surface with fine radiating strive, crossed by concentric growth lines and obscure undulations. Internally a thin plate passes vertically down from the anterior end of the hinge plate separating a 490, THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Lamellibranechiata. small lobe, immediately beneath and sometimes a little in front of the beaks, from the umbonal cavity. Hinge plate narrow, with a few ligament striations and two small oblique cardinal teeth; no lateral teeth. Muscular impressions and pallial line very faint. Type: A. bellistriata Hall. It will be seen that the foregoing description of this genus is, in many respects, widely different from that adopted by all preceding authors. Hall’s original diag- nosis is, of course, too broad and on the whole indefinite, since it included species which subsequent study proved to be quite different from the typical species. Again, the commonly accepted characterization of Ambonychia, since the publication of Hall’s notes on the genus in 1859, is based upon his A. radiata and not upon A. belli- striata, which, of all the species placed under Ambonychia by him in 1847, alone is entitled to the distinction of being the type. Ambonychia, therefore, as generally understood, is synonymous with the group of shells which now propose to name Byssonychia, and quite distinet from Ambonychia as based upon A. bellistriata and A. orbicularis (Emmons), the two species first following the original description of the genus. This new interpretation of the genus may produce some confusion, but it is necessitated by the rule of priority, which demands that when no type is mentioned the first species to follow the original description must be regarded as the type of the genus. _ Having then no alternative but to accept A. bellistriata as the type, I have redefined the genus in accordance with the characters presented by that species and four others, A. orbicularis Emmons, A. planistriata Hall, A. affinis, n. sp. and A. amygdalina Hall, all of which, with the possible exception of the last, are unques- tionably congeneric. Compared with other members of the family, Ambonychia, as here understood, differs from Clionychia, Ulrich, in having a small lobe-like cavity beneath the beaks where, in that genus, there is a mere thickening of the margin of the valves. In casts of the interior the whole upper part of the anterior side of Clionychia is impressed to the edge of the valves, while in Ambonychia the same part presents a small protruding, vertically elongate lobe, separated from the anterior side of the rostral cavity by a sharply-impressed thin line. This lobe reminds one greatly of the anterior adductor impression of Vanuxemia, but I could not satisfy myself that it really lodged such a muscle. Other differences are that in Ambonychia the valves are more ventricose and the umbones and beaks more strongly incurved, while the surface is marked not only concentrically but also radially. In Byssonychia there is a byssal opening in the anterior side and the hinge is strengthened by two or three slender posterior lateral teeth. The Upper Silurian genus, Amphicelia, Hall, may LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 49] Ambonychia planistriata.] be more nearly related to Ambonychia than either of the genera mentioned. Certain it is that I find it more difficult to point out the distinguishing features than | did in those cases. The general appearance of the shells of the two genera-(Ambonychia and Amphicwlia) is very similar, both in the matter of form and in their surface mark- ings. The hinge also is very much the same in the two genera, the chief difference being that the area is wider in Amphicwlia. The greatest difference, however, seems to lie in the antero-cardinal region, where the margin of the latter is thickened, causing casts of the interior to appear as broadly impressed in this region. AMBONYCHIA PLANISTRIATA Jal. PLATI2 XXXV. FIGS. 3 and 4. Ambonychia planistriata MALL, 1861. Rep’t. Sup’t. Geol. Sur. Wis., p. 32. Shell obliquely acuminate-ovate or subrhomboidal, ventricose, with the point of greatest convexity near the center of the antero-cardinal half. Upper half of anterior side somewhat flattened, nearly straight, sloping backward slightly, and more rapidly below, into the basal margin, which, with the greater part of the posterior edge, forms a semicircle; postero-cardinal margin subangular, hinge line straight, one- third or a little less shorter than the greatest length of the shell beneath, Beaks prominent, strongly incurved; umbones full and rounded; posterior cardinal slope concave. Surface marked by distinct, broad and shallow concentric undulations and fine radiating striz, of which about twelve occur in 5 mm. at the margin of an average example. These striw, which are flattened and separated by very narrow interspaces, are cancellated by another set of even finer concentric lines. ‘Test very thin, hinge plate narrow, apparently with two cardinal teeth in each valve and no lateral teeth. In good casts of the interior the antero-cardinal lobe is sharply defined. This rare and beautiful species is readily distinguished from A. bellistriata Hall, and A. orbicularis Emmons, sp., by. its concentrically undulated surface. In this feature it is like Clionychia undata Emmons, sp., but that form, aside from the fact that it has the characters of Clionychia, is less ventricose, of somewhat different shape and without radiating lines. For comparisons with A. afinis Ulrich, see that species. Formation and locality.—From the ‘‘ Lower Blue limestone” at Mineral Point and Beloit, Wiscon- sin, and the equivalent limestones at Cannon Falls, Minnesota, and Lee county, Lilinois. Mus Reg. No. 8327. 492 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. [Ambonychia bellistriata. AMBONYCHIA BELLISTRIATA /Hall. 5 PLATE XXXY, FIGS. 1 and 2. Ambonychia bellistriata HALL, 1847. Pal. N. Y., vol. i, p. 163. Not Ambonychia bellistriata 8. A. Miller, 1874, Cin. Quart. Jour. Sci., vol. i, p. 14. The Minnesota specimen illustrated on the accompanying plates differs slightly in its outline from the original figures of the species given by Hall im the work cited.* The hinge line is a trifle longer and the anterior side less uniformly curved. Still, I cannot for a moment doubt its specific identity with the types of the species, since it possesses all the more essential characters. The beaks and umbones are very prominent and strongly incurved, and the radiating striz fine (about twelve or thirteen in 5 mm.) and apparently of the same character as in A. planistriata, except- ing that they show no traces of the fine concentric lines noticed in that species. Compared with A. planistriata the present species is found to differ in the relative narrowness and greater prominence of its umbones, and in wanting the shallow con- centric undulations, which are always a striking feature of that species. A. orbicu- laris is a more erect and rounded form, and not so ventricose. The name Ambonychia bellistriata occurs in all the published catalogues of the fossils of the Cincinnati group, but the species referred to in the lists is really a very different one. Indeed, it is a true member of the proposed genus Byssonychia, and closely related to the type of that genus, B. radiata Hall, sp. Formation and locality.—In the central part of the Trenton limestone at Middleville and Trenton Falls, New York; and in the middle Galena near Wykoff, Minnesota. AMBONYCHIA AFFINIS, 2. SD. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 5—%. This species or variety is most probably a later phase of A. planistriata Hall, and as it resembles that species very greatly it will be sufficiently characterized by pointing out the differences. Thus, the beaks and umbones are a little less tumid and the convexity of the shell correspondingly less. The shell is also a trifle more erect and rounder, the hinge line slightly shorter and the postero-cardinal margin more rounded. Finally, the concentric undulations are much more obscure, while the radiating striae are coarser, there being only eight in 5 mm. to twelve in the same space for that species. At first I thought the species might prove the same as A. orbicularis Emmons, sp., but a comparison with Hall’s figures in vol. i of the Palz- ontology of New York, will show that the anterior side of the New York species is *An examination of the types of the species, which are now preserved in the American Museum of New York City, proves that figs. 4a and 4b (on plate 36) are faulty in showing the radiating lines stronger than natural. Indeed, they ure quite as strong in these figures as in the magnified views of the surface represented in fig. 4d. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 493 Ambonychia affinis.] more prominent, giving it a more erect appearance than any of the other species referred to the genus. Nor can I find that A. orbicularis ever has concentric undu- ations. Formation and locality—Middle Galena, Weisbach’s dam, near Spring Valley, Minnesota; also in Carroll county, Llinois. Mus. Reg. No. 83438. AMBONYCHIA AMYGDALINA J/all. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 8 and 9. Ambonychia amygdalina HAL, 1847. Pal. N. Y., vol. i, p. 165. None of the specimens seen by me preserve the surface characters well enough to prove that this species was provided with radiating lines. Obscure traces of such strive are to be made out on one of the casts of the interior, but the evidence is not sufficient for me to assert that they are what they seem. Still, it is highly probable that radiating striz will be found on perfect specimens, in which case the species would stand very near A. bellistriata, differing from it, so far as we can now see, chiefly in its greater size, less incurved beaks, flatter anterior side and less angular postero-cardinal margin. The anterior lobe is longer, more sunken and less sharply defined in this species than in the others here referred to Ambonychia. Formation and locality.—Middle Galena of Goodhue county, Minnesota. The New York type of the species is credited to the Trenton limestone at Adams, Jefferson county. Billings also catalogues the species from the same horizon in Canada. Genus CLIONYCHIA, Ulrich. Ambonychia (part.) HALL, 1847. Pal. N. Y., vol. i, p. 163. Clionychia, Ubnicu, 1892. American Geologist, vol. x, p. 97; Clionychia, MILLER, 1892. First Ap- pendix, N. A. Geol. and Pal., p. 699. Shells equivalve, moderately covvex, subalate posteriorly; beaks terminal, com- paratively small, not very prominent and but little incurved. Cardinal line straight, rather long, forming an angle of less than 90° with the anterior side. Surface marked concentrically only. No byssal opening, the margins closing tightly all around. Muscular impressions situated in the postero-cardinal third, large, bilobed, the lower lobe much larger than the upper. Pallial line simple, extending from the posterior adductor to the rostral cavity. Hinge plate of moderate strength, without cardinal or lateral teeth, excavated longitudinally for a linear ligament. Upper part of anterior edge thickened, producing a more or less well-marked impression in this part of casts of the interior. Anterior pedal muscle attached a short distance behind the beaks. Type: Ambonychia lamellosa Hall. 494 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. [Ambonychia amygdalina. This well marked genus embraces probably the simplest and earliest types of the family, from which all the other genera descended. Yet, while a direct line to Mytilarca and Plethomytilus seems obvious enough, I must confess my inability to bridge over the gap between the radially ribbed genera on the one hand—and these form a very natural and closely interrelated group—and those in which the surface is marked with concentric lines only, on the other. At present, therefore, the evi- dence favors the conclusion that in times preceding the Chazy there existed a more primitive type still that combined the characters of the two groups. Compared with Ambonychia, as here restricted, the present genus differs in its smaller umbones and less incurved beaks, in wanting radiating strive and in the structure of the anterior side, there being, instead of a clavicle-like plate or ridge ‘beneath the beaks, a mere thickening of the margin, leaving a cavity or impression in the cast where that genus presents a small lobe. Mytilarca, Hall, which probably was not evolved till after the close of the Lower Silurian, is distinguished by its cardinal and posterior lateral teeth, and more oblique form. In the remarks following the original description of the genus I mentioned Ambonychia amygdalina Hall, as belonging here. This I now believe to have been an error. Respecting A. nitida and superba, described by Billings from Anticosti, and other concentrically marked species that have been referred to Ambonychia, it may suffice to say that they are not congeneric with the types of that genus. Their true relations cannot be established until we know something definite about their hinges. Some of the species in question are much like 4. acutirostra and aphiea, two species described by Hall from the Niagara rocks of Wisconsin and Illinois that should go with Mytilarca and not with Clionychia. CLIONYCHIA LAMELLOSA all. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 10-14. Ambonychia lamellosa HALL, 1861. Rept. Sup’t. Geol. Sur. Wis., p. 31; WHITFIELD, 1882, Geol. Rep. Wis., vol. iv, p. 205. Ambonychia attenuata HALL, 1861. Rep. Sup’t. Geol. Sur. Wis., p. 38; WHITFIELD, 1882, Geol. Rep, Wis., vol. iv, p. 206. Shell obliquely, subquadrangular or subovate in outline; binge line straight, generally but little shorter than the length of the shell beneath; anterior margin nearly straight, sloping backward five to fifteen degrees from a vertical line, below curving rather rapidly into the strongly convex basal line; posterior margin more gently curved, joining the hinge line sometimes sharply at other times gradually. Valves rather strongly convex, most ventricose in the umbonal region and near the anterior side where the slope to the edge is abrupt; cardinal slope gentle, in some cases nearly flat, in others distinctly concave. Beaks terminal, small, acutely LAMELLIBRANCHIATA, 495 Clionychia nitida.] attenuate in casts, generally curving slightly forward, projecting but little above the hinge and scarcely incurved. Beneath them the anterior side of casts presents a broad and often sharply-defined depression which, in extending downward, gradu- ally dies out at or a little beneath a point midway between the base and the hinge. Surface, especially near the free margins, marked with numerous, unequally dis- tributed concentric lines of growth, having the appearance, even on the casts, of being the edges of overlapping lamellae. Hinge plate rather strong, without teeth, the ligamental area wide and faintly striated. Muscular scar bilobed, situated almost entirely within the postero-cardinal third of the valve. Pallial line simple, extend- ing up the anterior side apparently to the cavity of the beak. The form of this species seems to be quite variable, but after a careful study of humerous specimens I have concluded that much of this supposed instability is due to distortion through pressure. On the other hand, for the same reason, | found it utterly inpossible to detect really normal specific differences between the specimens which Hall in his original work and Whitfield in the later volume cited above have separated as two species under the names Ambonychia lamellosa and A. attenuata. According to my view the latter is founded upon specimens of the former whose original form was changed by pressure acting so as to decrease the diagonal or the vertical diameter of the valves, causing them to appear abnormally elongate. Whitfield’s figure of A. attenuata, (op. cit. plate V, fig. 6) represents, instead of the left, most surely the right side of an obviously distorted specimen. It is a little surprising that a paleontologist of such wide experience as Prof. Whitfield should have failed to observe the evidences of distortion, and more so still, that he should mistake one valve for the other, especially of a specimen that preserves the posterior - adductor sears. These we know are situated in the postero-cardinal third of the valves, but his error leads him so far astray that he asserts without qualification “they are situated near the anterior border of the valve.” This species cannot be confounded with the associated Ambonychia planistriata Hall, but care is required in separating it from the two species of Clionychia next described. Formation and locality.—Lower Blue and Upper Buff limestones, Beloit, Mineral Point and Janes- ville, Wisconsin; Dixon, Illinois, and the upper part of the Trenton limestone at Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. Mus. Reg, Nos. 5676, 8314. CLIONYCHIA NITIDA, 2. Sp. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 15 and 16. This form is so much like the preceding (C. lamellosa) that it scarcely deserves specific recognition. Critically compared it is found to differ in the following 496 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. [Clionychia erecta—rhomboidea. respects: The umbonal slope is less defined, the whole surface being more uni- formly convex, the beaks not so attenuate and more incurved, and the concentric growth lines not nearly so sharp, much more numerous and more equal. Casts of the interior are almost smooth, and the shell substance must have been very thin. The anterior side also is less concave, the shell smaller and the valves proportionally a little more convex. Formation and locality.—Central part of the Trenton limestone at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mus, Reg. No. 5099. CiionycHiA ERECTA Hall. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 17 and 18. Ambonychia erecta HALL, 1861. Rep. Sup’t. Geol. Sur. Wis., p 32. This species also is exceedingly like C. lamellosa, and for a time I was inclined to question the propriety of maintaining it. A more careful comparison, however, has revealed slight peculiarities that cause me now to view the separation with some favor. The valves of C. erecta are not so convex and more nearly square, the outer side being almost vertical and more produced below, the posterior side is straighter above and the postero-cardinal angle sharper. In all other respects the two forms are, so far as we can learn, identical. C. nitida is more oblique, its valves more convex and their surface markings finer. Formation and locality.—Trenton limestone Beloit, Wisconsin, and Minneapolis, Minnesota. CLIONYCHIA RHOMBOIDEA Ulrich. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 19 and 20. Clionychia rhomboidea ULRICH, 1892. Amer. Geol., vol. x, p. 97. Shell, as seen in casts of the interior, of medium size, very oblique, rhomboidal in outline, the anterior and posterior and the dorsal and ventral margins subparallel. Dorsal edge nearly straight, likewise the posterior, the two lines meeting at an angle of about 120°. Postero-ventral margin sharply curved, the ventral side gently convex and rounding almost uniformly up to the base of the anterior side, from which point the outline continues to the beaks in very nearly a straight line. Beaks terminal, small, pointed, projecting slightly above the hinge line, scarcely incurved. Umbonal ridge strongly convex, extending toward the postero-ventral extremity in a slightly curved direction, so that the slopes on the anterior and ventral sides are more abrupt than on the opposite sides. Point of greatest convexity a little in front of and above the middle. Interior with hinge plate rather wide and strong, and the anterior edges of the valves, for a short distance beneath the beaks, much thickened inwardly, the decay LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 497 Clionychia undata. of the shell leaving a distinct depression in the casts. Muscular scars large, situated about midway in the postero-car linal half of the valve, the two lobes united by a narrow neck, the upper one oval in shape and about one-third as large as the more nearly circular lower one. } The posterior extremity is more produced and more narrowly curved than in the other species referred to this genus. Formation and locality.—Lower limestone of the Trenton formation at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mus. Reg. No. 5526. CLIONYCHIA UNDATA [/mmons. PLATE XxXxXV. FIGS. 21 and 22. Plerinea undata EMMONS, 1842. Geol, Report. New York, p. 395, Ambonychia undata HALL, 1847. Pal. New York, vol. i, p. 165. Shell subquadrate, cardinal margin long, straight, anterior side straight, nearly vertical, curving sharply backward below into the gently convex base, which in its turn curves rapidly upward into the broadly rounded posterior margin; antero- cardinal angle about 85°, postero-cardinal angle about 115°. Beaks prominent, attenuate, slightly incurved, with the umbones strongly convex, the anterior slope very abrupt, the rapidity of the descent becoming gradually less in following the margin around to the posterior extremity of the hinge, where it is very gentle; cardinal slope concave, becoming strongly so and very abrupt in nearing the beaks. Surface marked with broad concentric folds, which are strongest on the cardinal and umbonal slopes and fade away gradually in curving around to the anterior side. Immediately beneath the beaks the anterior side of a good cast of the interior presents a sharply defined lunule-like impression, which, having been occupied by an internal thickening of the margin of the valves, was scarcely indicated on the exterior of the shell. Hinge plate narrow, muscular impressions undetermined. The above description is based upon the specimen illustrated on plate xxxvy. It presents no evidence of distortion and seems to be in every respect in a good state of preservation. Comparing this example with Hall’s description and figures of the New York types of the species we observe that it differs in several particulars that might be regarded as important. The outline is more nearly quadrate, and the convexity of the valves less, giving a form that deviates from the figures of the New York specimen precisely as C. erecta does from C. lamellosa, Hall also mentions the absence of a “definite lunette,” while such an impression is distinctly present in the casts of the Minnesota specimens. Despite these differences | am almost contident of the specific identity of the latter and the types of the species, because | am inclined to doubt the actual existence of the discrepancies noticed. 32— 495 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. {[Byssonychia. The broad undulations of the surface distinguish the species from the other a shells referred to Clionychia. Formation and locality.—Middle Galena, Fillmore and Goodhue counties, Minnesota; associated with Zygospira uphami W. and §., Vanuxemia abrupta Ulrich and Lichas (Hoplolichas) robbinsi Ulrich. The original specimen is from the Trenton limestone at Watertown, New York. Genus BYSSONYCHIA, n. gen. Ambony chia (part.), HALL, 1847. Pal. New York, vol. i, p. 163. Ambonychia, HALL, 1859. Pal. New York, vol. iii, pp. 269 and 5233 also of all American and European authors who have described that genus subsequent to this date. General aspect as in Ambonychia, Hall, excepting that the beaks and umbones are not so full. A well-defined byssal opening in the upper half of the anterior side. Hinge with a striated ligamental area, several small cardinal teeth and generally two or three slender lateral teeth near the posterior extremity. Posterior adductor impressions large, situated a little behind the center of the valves. Pallial line simple, terminating in the rostral cavity. Type: Ambonychia radiata Hall. (See fig. 35, v1, p. 477.) The erection of this genus became a necessity when a critical study of Ambony- chia bellistriata Hall, and several other species undoubtedly congeneric with that peculiar type of the genus Ambonychia, proved them to be without not only lateral teeth but a byssal opening as well. On the other hand byssonychia has nothing like the anterior subrostral clavicle, while the external radiating coste are nearly always stronger than ‘in Ambonychia. We have, therefore. at least three ordinarily valid generic differences to separate the two genera. Indeed, there is room for one or more intermediate genera. Two very nearly such groups actually exist in the Cin- cinnati rocks and I hope to publish descriptions of them in the next (7th) report of the state geologist of Ohio. One (Allonychia) will contain, besides the type, Ambony- chia (Megambonia) jamesi Meek, two new species. They are all more erect shells, possessing a protruding byssal opening, a short hinge with wide ligamental area, but neither cardinal nor lateral teeth. The other group (H7ridonychia) is based upon several elongate new species, having but little incurved beaks, scarcely ventricose umbones, a long and narrow byssal opening, thin hinge plate and no teeth. Byssonychia is closely related to Anomalodonta, Miller, but is distinguished by its hinge, that genus having neither truelateral nor cardinal teeth. Itis to be admitted, however, that in certain species, otherwise precisely like Byssonychia, the posterior lateral teeth are nearly or quite obsolete. Descriptions of these and other new species of this genus have been written for the Ohio work above mentioned. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 499 BySsonychia intermedia.] The Ambonychia intermedia Meek and Worthen, of the Galena, seems to be the earliest species of Byssonychia now known. Perhaps contemporaneous with this is a form, occurring in the Trenton of Kentucky and Tennessee, that is scarcely distin- guishable from the Hudson River B. radiata. Nine or ten additional species, of which two only are described (A. retrorsa and robusta, of Miller) occur in the Hudson River and Cincinnati rocks. So far as known the genus became extinct with the close of the Lower Silurian. ByssonycHta INTERMEDIA Meek and Worthen. PLATE XXXV, FIGS. 23-26. Ambonychia intermedia MEEK and WortTHEN, 1868. Geol. Sur. IIl., vol. iii, p. 306. Shell small, rhombic-subovate, the length and hight about as eleven is to fourteen; gibbous in the umbonal, anterior and central regions, compressed and subalate postero- dorsally. Hinge line a little shorter than the greatest antero-posterior diameter of the valves, ranging at an angle of about 90° with the anterior margin. Anterior side truncated nearly vertically above, below rounding backward into the base, the outline around the lower two-fifths of the shell forming nearly a regular semicircle. Poste- rior margin straightened above or rounding regularly into the hinge line. Beaks prominent, full, obtusely pointed, strongly incurved with a slight forward direction. Internal casts are somwhat excavated in the upper part of the front in the space surrounding the small byssal opening, and between the latter and the points of the beaks there is a small protuberance representing the filling of a little cavity at the extremity of the hinge plate. Surface marked by rather fine radiating plications, the total number, as near as can be determined from casts, being between forty-five and fifty. ‘They are coarser on the ventral slope than on the posterior wing, always simple and increase in strength with the growth of the shell. On large casts the coste are not defiued except at the free margins, the rest of the surface being smooth. Muscular sear and pallial line unusually obscure, their positions and form not certainly determined, : This little shell is a true Byssonychia and quite different from Ambonychia belli- striata Hall, with which Meek and Worthen compare it. It is related to the follow- ing species, but a nearer ally is found in the B. vera Ulrich, of the lower part of the Cincinnati exposures. That species, of which an excellent internal cast is figured on page 479 (fig, 36, pl. V), is less gibbous, more oblique and has smaller beaks, while the muscular scars and pallial] line are usually more distinctly impressed. Formation and locality.—Galena limestone, Mount Carroll, Illinois; Oshkosh, Wisconsin, and near Wykotf, Minnesota. Mus. Reg. No. 8359. 500 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. . Pa [Byssonychia tenuistriata . ByssoNnYCHIA TENUISTRIATA, #1. Sp. Vig. 39. Byssonychia tenwistriata, n. sp. Hudson River group, Granger, Minnesota. The right side and a front view of an imperfect cast of the the interior. Mus. Reg. No. 8371. Shell rather small, subovate, moderately ventricose in the umbonal region and anterior half, compressed in the postero-cardinal region where the surface is dis- tinctly concave; anterior slope strongly convex, but scarcely abrupt; beaks small, projecting but little, moderately inecurved. Hinge line comparatively short, the outline passing rather gently into the broadly-rounded posterior margin; basal line strongly convex, curving uniformly into the ends; anterior side slightly concave above, neatly convex below. Byssal opening small, its position high, it and the surface around it appearing in casts as a distinct impression immediately beneath the beaks. Surface marked with very fine radiating strie and obscure concentric varices of growtb, both showing through the marginal parts of the shell, so as to be visible on good casts of the interior. The total number of the radiating striz is probably more than seventy. Near the base of the specimen figured eleven were counted in the space of 5 mm. This species is closely related to B. vera Ulrich, (see ante p. 479, fig. 36, V) from the Utica horizon of the Cincinnati group of Ohio, differing from it chiefly in its finer radiating strize and more impressed byssal opening. B. intermedia M. and W., of the Galena, has coarser strive and is a more ventricose shell. Formation and locality.—Rare in the upper part of the Hudson River rocks at Granger and Spring Valley, Minnesota, and in an equivalent position at Richmond, Indiana. Mus. Reg. Nos. 8370, 8371. Family MODIOLOPSIDAj, n. fam. Shell equivalved, usually elongate ovate, but varying to oblong subquadrate, generally thin; valves fitting closely or gaping slightly at one or both ends. Beaks near the anterior end, but never terminal. Hinge long, of variable strength, edentu- lous or with one or two cardinal teeth in one or both valves. Ligament long, linear, external and internal. Anterior adductor impressions rather large and distinct, situated between the beaks and the anterior extremity; above them a very small LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 501 Modilolopside.] pedal muscle scar. Posterior adductors large, very faintly impressed, situated Jess than their diameter from the posterior extremity of the hinge. Pallial line simple. Inner side of valves usually with one or two obtuse ridge-like thickenings extending from the beaks obliquely backward toward the center of the ventral margin. Of the various genera included in this family in the scheme of classification on page 455, [am satisfied that some of those preceded by a question mark will be sooner or later placed elsewhere. No more satisfactory arrangement having suggested itself, they were referred here, because their known characters agree with one or another of the more typical genera. Thus, Aristerella, aside from its unequal valves, compares favorably with Hurymya, Cypricardella seems to be related to Modio- morpha, and Endodesma to Modiolopsis and Cymatonota, while Psiloconcha, in a general way, resembles Aetinomya. ‘But of Pyanomya too little is known to venture an opinion as to its ultimate placement, the only excuse for recognizing the genus in this connection being that it would be even more out of place in any of the other families. The position of Prolobella also is quite uncertain. Some of the species of Modiolopsis remind us so strongly of Modiola and Myoconcha that we can scarcely escape the conviction that the latter genera, which are placed respectively in the families Mytilide and Prasinidw by Stoliczka and Zittel, have really descended from Modiolopsis. Still, | am of the opinion that the paleozoic types constitute a more natural grouping by themselves than can be attained by any of the courses adopted heretofore. . The position usually assigned to Modiolopsis is near Modiola in the family Mytilidw, but Stoliczka and Zittel see greater resem- blances with Myoconcha and therefore regard the genus as an early type of the Prasinide. But both of these families, the first in partiular, seem to me to include heterogeneous material, and if they were revised according to the genesis of the Lamellibranchiata, I have no doubt their limits would be greatly modified. The first reason to influence me for the separation of Modiolopsis from the Mytilide occurred during a comparison with Myalina, Koninck, a genus that, while it seems to be very justly associated with Mytilus, has no relation to Modiolopsis. Indeed, according to my view, the progenitors of Myalina are to be sought for among the Ambonychiide. Next, a comparison with recent species of Modiola proved that while a general resemblance obtained there were still certain features in which the genera here classed as the Modiolopside agreed thoroughly among themselves and differed from Modiola. Thus, in the latter, and the same is true of all the Mytilide, the anterior adductor impression is always smaller and the posterior one situated farther from the cardinal margin as well as of a shape, including the prolongation formed by the pedal muscles, never seen in the paleozoic shells under consideration. On the whole 502 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. LModiolopsis. the configuration of these parts in the latter is much more like what we see in the Cyytodontide. Another feature in which the Modiolopside resemble the Cyrtodontide, and one that, so far as | am aware, has never been noticed in Modiola nor Mytilus, is the presence on the inner surface, at any rate of all the thick shells, of one or two obtuse ridges extending from the beaks obliquely backward-and toward the ventral margin, producing corresponding more or less well-marked furrows on casts of the interior. : Finally, there is to be urged that it is only a few shells, like Modiolopsis modio- laris and M. concentrica, in which the anterior end is narrow and unusually short, and a byssal sinus present, that exhibit any striking resemblances to either Modiola or Myoconcha. No one would, I believe, say this of elongate shells like M. arguta and M. angustata, and when it comes to Orthodesma, which can ‘be shown to have origin- ated in the same stock that produced Modiolopsis, all agree in removing that genus far from the Mytilide. The many points of agreement that may be noticed between the Modiolopside and the Cyrtodontidew probably indicate a close union of the two groups in times preceding the Chazy; but, as far back as our knowledge now extends, there prevailed at least one important distinguishing feature. Namely, there existed a difference in the shell structure which, though its exact nature is unknown, is nevertheless clearly evidenced by the appearance of the two groups of fossils when they are preserved in soft shales, the shells of the former always being covered by a black or dark film never seen on the latter. Genus MODIOLOPSIS, Hall. Modiolopsis (part.), HALL, 1847. Pal. New York, vol. i, p. 157. Shell more or less elongate, usually subovate, widest posteriorly; valves moder- ately ventricose, closing tightly all around. Beaks small, near the anterior extremity; umbones depressed by a flattening or depression which crosses the valves obliquely and widening causes a straightening or sinuation of the basal outline. Hinge of moderate strength, rarely straight, generally somewhat arcuate, without well-marked teeth; an obscure oblique thickening beneath the beak of one valve and a corres- ponding depression in the other occasionally distinguishable. Ligaments linear, ° external and internal, chiefly the former. Anterior adductor impression subovate, large, deep, sharply defined on the inner side, occupying the greater part of the small anterior end. Posterior scar very faintly impressed, large, subcircular, situated near the center of the posterior third of the cardinal slope. Pallial line simple. Anterior pedal muscle forming a minute pit in the under side of the hinge plate beneath the beak. Posterior pedal muscles large, attached just above and in front of the adductor. LAMELLIBRANCHIIATA. 503 Modiolopsis.] Type: M. modiolaris Conrad, sp. As here restricted and defined, this genus constitutes a well-marked group of lower paleozoic shells. The oldest species, so far as known, occur in the Birdseye and Black River divisions of the Trenton formation. Some of these are of an oval type that, by gradual modifications of the base, evolved species of the MZ. modiolaris type. At the same time there existed elongate forms like M. arguta, having so much in common with Orthodesma that we cannot doubt that they indicate the primitive stock from which Modiolopsis and Orthodesma were evolved. The M. arguta line continued and formed a reasonably complete chain through WW. nana, M. mytiloides Hall, M. angustata, and one or two undescribed species of the middle beds of the Cincinnati group, into M. concentrica H. and W., a common species of the upper part of that series of rocks in Ohio and Indiana, and into MW. excellens from equivalent strata in Minnesota. In this case the form was shortened, the anterior end particu- larly. In the M. modiolaris line, however, the changes were different. Here we may begin with M. similis, an oval form with the posterior end broadly rounded and widest. This seems to have gone over into an upper Trenton species (M. subrecta Ulrich, Ms.) having a much narrower posterior end—indeed, the back and base are nearly parallel. We next follow the type by easy stages through varieties occurring in the Utica horizon to the normal form of M. modiolaris. Much indeed might be said upon these not only interesting but important questions of evolution, and nothing would please me more than to be allowed to demonstrate the positions here outlined. But time and space are lacking, and the few points made are offered chiefly in the hope that the suggestions may stimulate students to researches in similar lines. The field is inviting and the results to be obtained all important. The relations of the genus to the other genera of the family treated of in this chapter will be discussed in the remarks following their descriptions. No comparison of Modiolopsis and Modiomorpha, Hall, has, so far as I can learn, ever been published. This is strange, since the species of the two genera are strik- ingly similar. As a rule it seems they are regarded as differing widely, but in what respects we are not informed. Mr. S. A. Miller, for instance, places them into two distinct families, but fails to state his grounds for the separation.* A mistaken idea seems to prevail—where it originated I cannot say—that the hinge of Modiolopsis has lateral teeth, and this is given as the principal difference between the two genera by Nettleroth.+ Now, let us see what differences really exist between them. Taking Modiomorpha concentrica as representative of the Devonian genus, we find that, so far as external characters are concerned, it would pass very well for a species of Modiolopsis. Even *North American Geology and Valwontology, p. 458; 1889. +Kentucky Fossil Shells, p. 216; 1889. 504 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. [Modiolopsis similis. its interior, in a casual glance, would pass, there being the same large and deeply- impressed anterior adductor scar, and nearly every feature with which those conver- sant with species of Modiolopsis are familiar. The exception is in the hinge, which is found to have a slightly oblique fold or tooth over the muscular scar in the left valve and a corresponding groove in the right. In true Modiolopsis this tooth is wanting, or rather, it is but little developed, since an obscure thickening of the hinge plate between the muscular impression and the beak is noticeable in many species of Modiolopsis. Another feature is observed in Modiomorpha concentrica that may be of importance. Namely, the hinge plates posterior to the beaks are wider than in any Modiolopsis known. They extend inwardly and at the same time diverge, probably for the reception of a strong internal ligament, the removal of the thin plate leaving a sharp slit a little within the cardinal edge of casts of the interior. The value of the character is to be tested only by its persistence in other species referred to Modiomorpha. It is a matter worthy of being looked into, for it must be admitted that another difference between Modiolopsis and Modiomorpha, besides the only one now recognizable, is, to say the least, desirable. : Of the numerous species which have been placed in this genus many proved distinct when subjected to critical study. Others look doubtful, but must remain here for want of material to determine their relations. Of those to be removed some fall under the new genera about to be proposed. Thus, /. plana Hall, M. alata Ulrich and_perhaps MtruncataHall, belong to Hurymya; M. oviformis Ulrich, to Modiolodon; M. subelliptica Ulrich, to Allodesma; M. cincinnatiensis Hall and Whitfield, M. pulchella Ulrich, M. cancellata Walcott, M. oblonga Ulrich, M. pholadiformis Hall, and M. superba Hall to Actinomya; M. gesneri Billings and M. trentonensis Hall, to Endodesma. M. nasuta Conrad, sp., and M. subnasuta Meek and Worthen, belong to Orthodesma, Hall and Whitfield, and M. carinata Hall, possesses all the essential characters of Goni- ophora, Phillips. Of Upper Silurian species MW. recta Hall, from the Niagara of Wis- consin, is a Matheria, while the M. dicteus of the same author and locality, and M. primigenia Conrad, sp., of the Medina, have slender cardinal and posterior lateral teeth of the Cyrtodonta type. Moprovorsis sruitis Ulrich. PLATE XXXVI, FIGS. 1 and 2; PLATE XLII, FIG. 19. 1892. Modiolopsis similis ULR1cu. Nineteenth Ann. Report, Geol. Nat. Hist. Sur, Minn., p. 225. Shell of medium size, obliquely elongate ovate, highest in the posterior half, contracted at the beaks to between one-half and three-fifths of the greatest hight. Hinge line nearly straight, about half as long as the shell posterior to the beaks. Anterior end small, neatly rounded; ventral margin gently convex, nearly straight LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 505 Modiolopsis consimilis.] in the middle: posterior end broadly rounded, slightly produced and more strongly convex in the lower half, the upper more gently curved and sometimes forming an obtusely angular junction with the hinge line. Beaks about one-seventh of the entire length of shell behind the anterior extremity, rather small, incurved, projecting moderately above the hinge; umbones compressed in the cast, a little less so in the shell. Surface moderately convex, most prominent along the umbonal ridge, the latter a little stronger than usual for species of this genus. Cardinal slope concave. A broad and comparatively well-defined mesial depression extends obliquely across the shell from the beak and, expanding, causes the straightening of the ventral mar- gin. Excepting in this part the shell is very thin, and the anterior muscular scar, which is comparatively of small size, is scarcely distinguishable in casts. Surface rather obscurely marked with numerous fine concentric lines and a few stronger varices of growth. As might be expected, this early species exhibits features intermediate between. those marking the group of forms which I now propose to distinguish as A¢timomya- ‘and true Modiolopsis. This is seen in the thin shell and consequent indistinctness of the anterior adductor impression, in the full and prominent umbones and the convex rather than straight or concave basal line. At first I was inclined to. put the species into the new genus, but later comparisons have shown that Aetire— wyd Was at that time already well established and that J/. similis belongs to the line which finally produced M. modiolari ws. Then the comparatively strong mesial depres- sion indicates Modiolopsis and not Meera - Compared with Minnesota Trenton species, all the others referred to Modiolopsis are narrower posteriorly. The Actinomy ya super ba Hall, sp., has a larger anterior end, the postero-basal margin more produced, and the umbones larger. The undescribed Kentucky species referred to in the original description proves to be a Cyrtodonta closely related to C. subovata Ulrich. Formation and loality.—Middle third of the Trenton shales at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mopionopsis (?) CONSIMILIS, . sp. \ PLATE XLII, FIGS. 17 and 18. This shell is so much like M. similis that at first I belheved it might belong to the same species. Carefully compared, however, it proved to differ in several characters that are more important than striking. The umbones are larger and very little compressed, and the mesial sulcus, which is a well marked feature in that species, is scarcely distinguishable. The outline also is a little different, the posterior hight being relatively somewhat less than in the preced- ing species. 506 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Modiolopsis oweni This species ought, perhaps, to go with ype meats rather than Modiolopsis, but as I have so far seen only the exterior of the shell, and therefore know nothing of the internal characters, it seemed best to refer it to Modiolopsis provisionally, because ' of a general resemblance to M. similis. I wish to say further, that I would not -be | surprised if the shell proved to have the hinge of a Cyrtodonta, several species of which it resembles quite as much as it does Modiolopsis. Formation and locality.—Near the base of the Trenton formation, Murfreesboro, Tennessee. MoproLopsis OWENI, 7. sp. PLATE XLII. FIGS. 15 and 16. This species is founded upon a single and not very well preserved cast of the interior. It seems to belong to Modiolopsis and very near M. similis, with which species it should be compared. As far as can be seen its valves were a little more convex, the mesial sulcus narrower, the anterior part of the shell somewhat inflated and the posterior part comparatively narrower. Formation and locality.—Galena shales, about five miles south of Cannon Falls, Minnesota. “MoproLopsis ARGUTA, 7. Sp. PLATE XXXVI, FIGS. 3—6. Shell small, ventricose, elongate, highest posteriorly, the length twice the greatest hight, and three times the hight at the beaks. Cardinal margin straight; anterior end unusually long, sharply rounded at the extremity of the hinge beneath which it slopes backward gradually curving into the straight ventral margin; poster- ior end strongly convex and most prominent in the lower half, above curving more gently and very gradually into the dorsal edge. Beaks a little more than one-sixth of the length from the anterior extremity, moderately prominent and incurved, com- pressed; mesial impression scarcely more than a mere flattening of the sides of the shell; umbonal ridge rather sharply rounded. Point of greatest convexity of valves very near the center. Surface with concentric lines, sharp, subequal and thread- like on the cardinal slopes, here with about ten in 5 mm. at their strongest parts, becoming faint before they pass over the umbonal ridge in their course to the anterior end where they are again somewhat thread-like. In good casts of the interior the anterior adductor sears are large, prominent, and marked on their inner halves with transverse lines. The surface markings do not show through the shell so as to mark the casts. Hinge thin, apparently edentulous. An average specimen is 24 mm. long, the largest seen about 31 mm. This is one of a number of closely related species ranging from the lower Trenton to the middle beds of the Cincinnati group. They are all elongate, especially so for LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 507 Modiolopsis nana.) Modiolopsis, anterior to the beaks. Their general expression, therefore, is decidedly like Orthodesma, of which some member of this line is believed to have been the ancestor. In Orthodesma the valves gape slightly at the ends, which is not the case in these shells. In that genus again the point of greatest thickness is more or less behind the center, while in all the species referred by me to Modiolopsis this point is central or anterior to the center. Furthermore, as stated under the generic descrip- tion, the VW. arguta line traces by very gradual degrees into M. concentrica H. and W., which is a Modiolopsis in every respect. M. nana, of the Galena shales, has stronger concentric striz, and these extend further forward and are visible on the internal cast, is scarcely so convex, with a deeper mesial depression and more obtuse umbonal ridge, and more rounded and shorter anterior end; M. mytiloides Hall, is without the even thread-like lines on the cardinal slope; and M, angustata Ulrich, of the Cincinnati rocks, has a more truncate posterior margin, more uniformly rounded anterior end, and more nearly parallel dorsal and ventral margins. Formation and locality.—Middle third of the Trenton shales, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Chatfield and Fountain, Minnesota. Mus. Reg. No. 8350. MopIoLopsis NANA, %. Sp. PLATE XXXVI, FIG. 7. This small species is closely related to M. arguta.- The differences are as follows: The valves are not quite as convex, the umbonal ridge is less sharply rounded, the mesial depression a trifle deeper, and the anterior end a little shorter and more uniformly rounded. The most striking peculiarity, however, is found in the con- centric lines which show very distinctly on casts of the interior, are coarser (eight in 5 mm.), more regular and continue of the same strength over the cardinal slope, umbonal ridge and forward into the mesial depression, near the center of which they are lost. 7 In M. mytiloides Hall, as identified in Minnesota, the surface of the casts is very obscurely marked with concentric lines, and the posterior extremity of the hinge line subangular. Only two specimens have been seen. Of one the length is 19 mm., the posterior hight 9.3 mm., the anterior hight 7.2 mm., the thickness 6 mm. Of the other these dimensions are respectively 16, 8, 6 and 5 mm. Formation and locality —Galena shales, near Cannon Falls, Minnesota. 508 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Modiolopsis mytiloides. MoproLtopsis mytiLtorpEs Hall. PLATE XXXVI, FIG. 8. Modivlopsis mytiloides HALL, 1847. Pal. New York, vol. i, p. 157. Three incomplete casts of the interior are referred to this species. They agree very well with Hall’s description and figures, except in being proportionately higher. But the general appearance of his figure 4a, particularly in the abruptness of the postero-basal curve, causes me to believe that the original of the figure has been compressed vertically and is therefore narrower than normal. - Compared with M. arguta and M. nana, which are closely simulated, it is found to differ in its surface markings, which are fine, with stronger wrinkles of growth, the latter showing only on casts; the concentric lines are, therefore, not equal nor thread-like. The outline differs in the subangular junction of the posterior and cardinal margins. The mesial depression also is more pronounced and the end of the casts in front of the depression more swollen, causing a slight concavity in the ventral margin. Formation and locality.—Trenton limestone, Middleville, New York; middle Galena, Goodhue and Fillmore counties, Minnesota, and Oshkosh, Wisconsin. According to Billings, in the Trenton and Black River groups of Canada. J Mus. Reg. No. 8361. MopioLopsis CHATFIELDENSIS, %. Sp. PLATE XXXVI, FIGS. 9 and 10. Shell small, subelongate, the length a little less than twice the hight. Dorsal and ventral margins nearly straight, subparallel, diverging slightly posteriorly; anterior end rather long, rounded; posterior margin broadly rounded, scarcely oblique, curving gradually into the hinge line. Beaks compressed, projecting little, situated about one-fourth of the entire length from the anterior extremity. Valves moderately convex, thickest at the middle, the umbonal ridge sharply rounded in the upper half; mesial flattening distinct, very gently concave. Surface of cast exhibiting rather broad and unequal concentric furrows which, on the shell itself, seem to have separated sharply-elevated lines. The latter were probably restricted to the cardinal and posterior slopes. Anterior adductor scar large, its inner edge sharply defined and curving forward. Hinge apparently thin and edentulous. Length 10 mm., posterior hight 5.2 mm., anterior hight 4.5 mm., thickness 3.38 mm. This species is not elongate, like the M. angustata Ulrich, of the Cincinnati rocks, its anterior end is shorter and the sides of the valves flatter; with a better defined umbonal ridge than in M. subparallela Ulrich, also occurring in that higher series of strata at Covington, Kentucky. Compared with Minnesota species, it is perhaps LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 509 Modiolopsis obsoleta.] nearest M. arguta, with which it is also associated. It is, however, readily distin- ugished by its surface markings, which are not visible on the casts of that species, and by its less oblique anterior and posterior ends and more nearly parallel ventral and dorsal margins. In M. faba Hall, which is probably not a true Modiolopsis, the mesial depression is much more distinct. M/. nana is wider and more oblique pos- teriorly, and has more regular surface markings. Formation and locality—Middle third of the Trenton shales, Chatfield, Minnesota. Mop1oLopsis OBSOLETA, 2. Sp. PLATE XXXVI, FIGS. 11 and 12. Shell small, elongate ovate, the length twice the greatest or posterior hight. Valves thickest a little above the center, rather uniformly convex, the umbonal ridge and mesial depression being both nearly obsolete. Beaks small, between one- fourth and one-fifth of the entire length from the anterior extremity. Dorsal margin gently arcuate, anterior end narrowly but almost uniformly rounded, ventral edge straight, posterior end slightly oblique, rather broadly rounded, most prominent a little beneath the center, above which it curves forward gradually into the hinge line. Surface with very fine concentric lines; these are equal and strongest near the posterior cardinal border. Hinge very thin, edentulous. Muscular scars not observed. Length 13.3 mm., posterior hight 6.6 mm., anterior hight 5 mm., thickness (left valve only) about 2.5 mm. Considerably like, and probably a near relative of M. arguta, but differs in the more uniform convexity of its surface, obsolete umbonal ridge and less oblique anterior margin. The posterior end also is comparatively narrower and the shell smaller. Avisterella nitidula is associated but cannot be confounded, since it is a smooth shell, with unequal valves, and much wider posteriorly. Formation and locality.—Associated with Plethocardia wmbonata, Matheria rugosa and other species marking the upper part of the middle third of the Trenton shales near Cannon Falls, Minnesota. Moproxtopsts concava Ulrich. PLATE XXXVI, FIGS. 15, 16, 16a: Modiolopsis concava ULRicu, 1892. Nineteenth Ann. Rep. Geoi. Nat. Hist. Sur. Minn., p. 227 Shell very small, elongate, the greatest hight a little less than the length, arcuate, the posterior end much the widest and broadly rounded, the anterior end exceedingly short, narrow and contracted beneath the beaks; the latter are small, compressed, and project but little above the hinge. Hight of posterior third about two and one-half times as great as at the beaks. Dorsum gently arcuate ; anterior two-thirds of ventral margin strongly concave, a fact due in a great measure to the 510 : THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. {[Modiolopsis concentrica width of the mesial sulcus and the rapid descent of the surface included in it. Umbonal ridge slight, cardinal slope, convex. Ina dorsal view the anterior half of the shell appears compressed, yet the point of greatest thickness is very near the middle of the length. Surface marked with simple concentric lines of growth. Hinge plate very thin, without teeth or appreciable thickening under the beak. Muscular scars not observed. This peculiar species, which is decidedly mytiloid in appearance and probably not a true Modiolopsis, is distinguished at once from all known Lower Silurian Lamellibranchiata, except M. arcuata Hall, by its strongly arcuate form, Hall’s species is represented as larger and with a straight instead of convex back. Formation and locality —Same as the preceding. Moptonopsis concentrica Hall and Whitfield. * PLATE XXXVII, FIGS. 15 and 16. Modiolopsis concentrica HALL and WHITFIELD, 1875. Pal. Ohio, vol. ii, p. 86. Shell rather exceeding medium size, elongate ovate, highest in the posterior half. Hinge line arcuate, gently declining toward the extremity and rounding gradu- ally into the oblique posterior margin, the same curve continuing to the lower third when it is sharpened in turning forward into the basal margin. The latter is gently convex in the posterior half and anterior third, the part between being very slightly concave. Anterior end very short, narrowly rounded. Beaks small, compressed, projecting very little above the hinge. Surface of valves moderately convex, most prominent a little in front of and above the middle; this point is on the umbonal ridge, which is low, broadly rounded, and not a conspicuous feature. Mesial sulcus shallow, forming an undefined depression across the valves from the beak to the middle third of the basal margin. Surface marked on the cardinal slope and poste- rior end by regular, even, concentric furrows, four to six of them in 5 mm. in their strongest parts. These furrows are most distinct along a line following the middle of the cardinal slope; in crossing the umbonal ridge they become suddenly obsolete, existing On the sides, basal portion, and anterior end only as fine irregular strize of growth. In casts of the interior the concentric furrows are distinctly visible on the posterior half of the cardinal slope. The mesial sulcus is much deeper and rather sharply defined on the posterior side by a strongly convex ridge extending obliquely across the cast from a point a short distance behind the beaks toward the basal margin, which, if the ridge did not become obsolete before reaching it, would he intersected at a point about three-fifths of the length of the shell behind the anterior extremity. In front of this ridge the surface is impressed and flattened to the LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. 511 Modiolopsis excellens ] strongly elevated filling of the anterior adductor scar. The latter is large, of oval shape, horizontally marked in its upper half; sharply defined all around and, because of the brevity of the anterior end, is situated partly beneath the point of the beak. Posterior scar large, but so faintly impressed that its exact shape cannot be deter- mined with the material at hand. Pallial line distinct only in the anterior half, where it consists of an obscurely pustulose raised line. To this species I refer provisionally a badly distorted mould of the exterior of a right valve, collected by me at Spring Valley in 1887. Its surface is marked precisely as described above, but the reference is still rendered doubtful by the fact that its anterior end is a little longer than is normal for the species. There is, how- ever, no reason to doubt that M. concentrica occurs in Fillmore county, and it is to draw attention to its probable occurrence in Minnesota that the species has been included in the report. Formation and locality.—A common species in the upper beds of the Cincinnati group at numerous localities in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky. Probably also in the Hudson River shales near Spring Valley, Minnesota. MoDIOLOPSIS EXCELLENS, 2. Sp. PLATE XXXVI, FIGS. 13-14. This species, of which we have five specimens, is closely related-to—AW. concentrica Hall and Whitfield, and was at first confounded with it. A careful comparison however proved its distinctness in the following respects: It attains a larger size, the casts are more uniformly convex, with the mesial sulcus, on both the shell and the cast, much shallower, for which reason the ventral margin is very slightly convex where it is sinuate in that species. The outline differs also in the postero- cardinal region being less uniformly curved and more prominent at the extremity of the hinge. The anterior end is longer so that a line drawn from the point of the beak across the shell at right angles to the hinge line passes within the inner border of the anterior adductor scar, whereas it cuts a third of the scar away in JZ. concen- trica, Finally, the concentric surface markings are finer and the difference between them as developed on the cardinal slopes and on the sides of the shell is a much less striking feature. The number of the concentric lines at a point about midway between the beaks and the posterior extremity varies in different specimens from six to nine in 5 mm. What I regard as a nearer ally occurs at the top of the Cincinnati hills. The outline of this species is intermediate between figures 6 and 15 of plate xxxvi. In its characters also it approaches one almost as nearly as the other. Formation and locality.—Upper part of the Hudson River group, Spring Valley and Granger, Minnesota. Mus. Reg. No. 8374. 4 512 THE PALEONTOLOGY OF MINNESOTA. (Eurymya. Genus HURYMYA, n. gen. Modiolopsis (part.) HALL and ULRICH. Shell thin, short, compressed, high and subalate posteriorly, greatly narrowed anteriorly, transversely truncate-ovate or subtriangular in outline. Cardinal margin straight, base oblique, gently convex. Beaks small, near the anterior extremity. Umbonal ridge moderate, rounded or subangular. No mesial sulcus, the surface of the valves forward and downward from the umbonal ridge being slightly convex or flat rather than concave. Hinge strong, with a broad longitudinally striated liga- mental area posterior to the beaks, and beneath them an obscure cardinal fold or tooth in the left valve and a corresponding depression in the right. Muscular impressions and pallial lie apparently as in Modiolopsis. Type: Modiolopsis plana Hall. The alate appearance of the postero-cardinal region, rounded base, absence of a mesial depression, and the presence of a striated ligamental area are the principal distinguishing features when compared with Modiolopsis. The anterior part of the ‘hinge is precisely as in Modiomorpha, Hall, but the Devonian shells, upon which that genus is founded, have no posterior striated ligamental area, while in nearly every other respect they agree with Modiolopsis. The new genus Modiolodon has one or more strong cardinal teeth in both valves, no ligamental area, and a mesial thicken- ing of the inner sides of the valves that produces mesial sulci on the casts. Besides the type only one other species has been described that I would place in this genus without question. This is the Modiolopsis alata Ulrich, from the hill quar- ries at Cincinnati, Ohio.