Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. he % we Ra I : z : Introduction . . . .« «© «© © e we « « Common Names... ..« «ec « « « Origin’. 3. 6) Ss Distribution .... Source of Hawaiian Infestation. . . Conditions Favorable to Establishment in the Hawaiian Islands ' Climatic Conditions . . .... Host Conditions Economic Importance UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BULLETIN No. 536 Contribution from Bureau of Entomology L. O. HOWARD, Chief PROFESSIONAL PAPER THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII E. A. BACK, Entomologist, and C. E. PEMBERTON, Assistant Entomologist, Mediterranean and other Fruit-Fly Investigations CONTENTS WASHINGTON . By January 26, 1918 lhtfie ye soe Galea a: Go be Ove A oes Methods of Spread ......-. » 18 18 (YS 5d UG oO caer Gobet BO Ce 21 Fruits Erroneously Listed as Hosts. 22 Proven Hosts in Hawaii. ... . 24. Life History and Description. . .. . 49 Seasonal History .... - Boe ite Wek tea teen Natural Control . . .. =.=... -« eae (Tf Artificial Control . . . « »« «© © «= e 101 Summary’ . 2s « « 0 « © » « « 0,116 GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1918 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 4%, BULLETIN No. 536 § f Contribution from the Bureau of Entomology Sw Yet. L. O. HOWARD, Chief . Washington, D. C. PROFESSIONAL PAPER January 26, 1918 THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWATI. By HE. A. Back, Entomologist, and C. E. PemBerron, Assistant Entomologist, Mediterranean and Other Fruit-fly Investigations. CONTENTS.! Page Page NRO MUGLOME eee ate: ce eee ae eeic a Sas 1a ie baby 2s oa ahaa CORB Sone Geo o Orato sar mraae 16 (Commonnamesmeas Aes soe oe See cles os 2m eMethodsronispreadie: on. -se cee eee eee eee 18 Omitting er cons cosa ieee eae aa necurener 2 | ELLOS tHMULGS Peers sae asi Se oe so nvAelseerons foe Ses oe 21 Distr Wt Ones ce ete Saal nee ebe ene 3 Fruits erroneously listed as hosts..-...-. 22 Source of Hawaiian infestation. ............. 8 Rrovenshostsimebawalls =. se2s.--.. 5 - 24 Conditions favorable to establishment in the Life history and description.............. ae 49 awallanelslan dGaresee = ser eee eceere seis OF miScasonalelnistomyees essa see eee = eae 75 Climatic conditions in Honolulu ........ One Nea tunalicombtnro leases eyo eel ea eles iae 77 Es h CoOmGWiNOISs S--sehogce ssc ouosssosede ie eAtinietalkcontnolesessceeias- = eee seein eee ae 101 WCOnOMICIMPpPOLlANCe asta eee sees i1s5." || SbbMII AVES Sec cneeods so cusedoee coat nsoereere 116 INTRODUCTION. The Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata Wied.) (fig. 1; Pl. 1, fig. 1) since its discovery in the Hawaiian Islands in 1910 has caused a serious and permanent check upon horticultural pursuits in these islands. The history of this pest shows that it has been gradually spreading to all tropical and subtropical countries. The frequency with which infested fruits from Hawaii are being discovered and con- demned at California ports by representatives of the Federal Hor- ticultural Board indicates that this fruit fly might have become es- tablished in parts of California and in our more Southern States and might now be doing untold injury to fruit interests but for the effi- cient quarantine maintained on the Pacific coast by State and Fed- eral authorities. It is feared, however, that the Mediterranean fruit fly ultimately will be able to find some unavoidable weakness in the quarantine work and eventually become established on the main- land of North America. The investigations reported in this publication have been carried on by the Bureau of Entomology, United States Department of Agri- 1 It has been found necessary to omit a bibliography consisting of about 350 references accompanied by brief résumé material. Reference should be made to Silvestri, EXO are No. 3, Hawaiian Bd. Agr. and Forestry, for the most complete printed bibliography. 81340°—18—B ull 536 -——1 2 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. culture, under the immediate supervision of Mr. Charles L. Marlatt, assistant chief of the bureau and chief of the Division of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit-Insect Investigations. This work was undertaken during September, 1912, primarily to make available for mainland fruit-growing interests information that will prove of imestimable value in determining the extent of the possible distribution of this pest and the factors of control which will be most important in eradi- cating newly discovered outbreaks. The senior writer wishes to acknowledge his obligations to Mr. Marlatt, who has greatly aided these investigations by his direction, and to express his appreciation of the assistance rendered by his associates, Messrs. C. E.. Pemberton and H. F. Willard. Fic. 1.—The Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata): a, Adult female; 6, head of same from front; c,spatula- like hair from face of male; d, antenna; e, larva; /, anal segment of same; g, head of same. a and e, Enlarged; 6, 9,/, greatly enlarged; c, d, still more greatly enlarged. (Howard.) COMMON NAMES. The common name “Mediterranean fruit fly’? was first used by Frogatt in 1899 to distinguish Ceratitis capitata from other fruit flies found in Australia. At the present time this name is the most widely used and most satisfactory of the common names by which this pest has been known and will be used by the writers. Other common names found in literature are ‘the fruit fly,” “the maggot,” “peach fly,” “peach maggot,’ “fruit grub,’ “apricot worm,” “trypeta fly,” “West Australian fruit fly,” “orange fly,” and “orange fly trypeta.” ORIGIN. Although Wiedemann first described Ceratitis capitata from speci- mens collected by Daldorf, supposedly in the East Indies, the failure of subsequent entomological exploration in the Indo-Malayan region to MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 3 locate this species, except where it is known beyond question to have been introduced; has led entomologists to seek its original home else- where. Known facts concerning the artificial spread of this pest narrow its probable origin to the African continental area. According to Bezzi, the genus Ceratitis is of African origin. Information gained by various writers indicates that southern Europe is not its native home, although it has been recorded from this region for many years. Leonardi states that the Mediterranean fruit fly was not recorded as a pest in southern Italy until 1863, nor in Sicily until1878. Hadit been a native of Italy its ravages, as were those of the olive fruit fly (Dacus oleae Rossi), would have attracted the attention of writers prior to this time. While De Bréme first records specimens reared in southern Spain in 1842, it is easier, in the light of more recent investigation, to believe Spain to be an adopted rather than the original home. Compere states that in 1903 there was living at Carcagente, Valencia County, Spain, an aged priest who could well remember the time in his childhood that peaches in that part of Spain were free from fruit- fly attack. Compere is also authority for the statement that com- mission merchants at Seville found that the pest was spreading farther inland to the north every season, even as late as 1903. The work of Graham (1910) and Silvestri (1912) has proved that C. capitata is present in the little-developed West African countries of Nigeria, Dahomey, and the Kongo, and Gowdy found the species already established in Uganda as early in the development of that country as 1909. These records, coupled with the information by the South African entomologists regarding its spread into the south- ern part of the African Continent, lend color to the statement of Silvestri that the natural habitat of Ceratitis capitata is “certainly tropical Africa south of 8° N. latitude.” Silvestri, however, is of the opinion that one can not state whether the whole of this region should be considered as the natural habitat, or only the western portion, until careful studies have been made in French Equatorial Africa and British East Africa. Further exploration of the west coast of Africa north of 8° north latitude is very likely to establish new rec- -ords of distribution and extend somewhat these limits of origin to include more semitropical territory. DISTRIBUTION. The Mediterranean fruit fly is at present established on every continent except that of North America. It has been recorded from the following regions: Europe: Spain, France, southern Italy, Sicily, Greece, and Malta. Asia: Asiatic Turkey (Beirut, Jerusalem, Jaffa.) Africa: Egypt (Cairo and Kafir el Zayet), Tunis, Algeria, the Azores, Madeira Islands, Canary Islands, Cape Verde Islands, Dahomey, southern Nigeria, the Kongo, Cape Colony, Natal, Delagoa Bay, southern Rhodesia, British East Africa, Uganda Protectorate, Mauritius, and Madagascar. 4 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Australasia: Western Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, and Queensland, northern New Zealand, and Tasmania. South America: Brazil and Argentina (Buenos Aires). North America: Bermuda Islands. Hawaiian Islands. MEDITERRANEAN REGIONS. The dates of the first discovery of the Mediterranean fruit fly in the countries bordering on the Mediterranean can not be used with precision in establishing a chronology of dispersion, since the pest may have been present many years prior to the first entomological observations recorded unless statements to the contrary are made in literature. Aside from our first record of establishment in Mau- ritius by Latreille in 1817, the earlier records refer to damage in the Mediterranean region. According to Macleay this pest was well established in the Azores, Cape Verde, and Madeira Islands as early as 1829, and was the source of much injury to oranges arriving at London from these islands. It was first recorded from Spain in 1842, from Algeria in 1859, and from Tunis in 1885. Compere gives us our first records of its presence in Egypt at Port Said and in Asiatic Turkey at Beirut, Jaffa, and Jerusalem in 1904. During the same year, Cartwright records the infestation of oranges at Kafir el Zayet (Egypt) and four years later Froggatt found many infested oranges in the Cairo (Egypt) markets. Literature does not record the presence of this pest in Malta until 1890, although it was known to have become established there about 1875. In France the Mediterranean fruit fly was reared from apricots at Courbevoie, in the environs of Paris, in 1900, and by 1904 the fruit industry around Maritimes was ruined, according to Hooper. in 1916 the citrus crops in Attica (Greece) and Epirus (Southern Albania) were reported infested. AFRICA. Very little is known regarding the general distribution of the Mediterranean fruit fly throughout the great central portion of the African continent. While it is known to be a serious pest along the Mediterranean shores and to have spread into the southern portion, too few entomological observations have been made to warrant state- ments concerning spread throughout the more tropical regions. Graham in 1910 and Silvestri in 1913 state that it occurs in Dahomey, southern Nigeria, and the Kongo. Gowdey’s records from Uganda in 1909 are the first from tropical East Africa, although Anderson states in 1914 that he had found C. capitata infesting coffee cherries in Brit- ish East Africa. In 1912 Jack lists C. camitata as abundant through- out southern Rhodesia, but Morstatt states definitely that the pest did not occur in coffee cherries in German East Africa during 1913 and 1914. The first record of injury caused by the Mediterranean fruit fly in South Africa was made by Miss Ormerod in 1889; but, as Mally states Bul. 536, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE |. THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY. Fic. 1.—Three adults of the Mediterranean fruit fly ( Ceratitis capitata) about natural size, attempting to oviposit in an orange; note the relative size of flies and fruit. Fic, 2——Ripe apple showing many punctures in the skin made by C. capitata in confinement. (Original.) MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. - 5 in 1904, it was introduced many years before. In 1893 Bairstow writes that he was familiar with C. capitata in South Africa in 1880, - and that the Rt. Rev. Bishop Richards remembered damage done as far in the past as 40 years. In 1903-4 Fuller records C. capitata as one of the newly observed pests among the Natal orchards. It is not known whether the introduction in South Africa was by infested fruit from the Madeiras or by the gradual spread overland along the coastal regions, although the Madeiras seem the more probable source. C. capitata was first recorded from Madagascar during 1914, when it was found seriously injuring the peach crop. AUSTRALASIA. Western Australia.—The Mediterranean fruit fly was first recorded in literature as a pest in Australia in 1897 by Fuller, who states that it had been known to have been established in western Australia for about two years in Claremont and Perth and along the Swan River, especially at Guildford. According to Despeissis, the first report of injury in Australia was made to the Bureau of Western Australia in 1894, which was, in his opinion, about one or two years after the date of its actual introduction. The pest has since been recorded from as far north as Geraldton and Northampton and as far south as Bunbury. New South Wales.—In New South Wales the Mediterranean fruit fly was first reared in 1898. French found that peaches imported into Victoria from Sydney were infested and notified Froggatt. Within a few days Froggatt was able to verify this record by rearings of his own from fruit supposed to have been infested by the Queens- land fruit fly (Bactrocera tryon Froggatt). As Froggatt had been on the watch for C. capitata, it is probable that it became estab- lished about Sydney during 1898, although Rose, in 1897, states that in the northern part of New South Wales, at Warialda, peaches and nectarines had been nearly all destroyed in 1897 by a fruit fly first appearing about 1895 and identified by Froggatt as probably C. capitata. According to Froggatt, the pest has spread through- out all the citrus orchards of New South Wales to a greater or less extent. Victoria.—Editorial comment in 1907 states that serious infesta- tion of C. capitata had been recently discovered in the orchards in Goulburn Valley and farther west at Bendigo and at Horsham, and Froggatt is authority for its establishment at Albury and for the statement that it is present throughout the northern half of Victoria. Queensland.—There are very few references to the presence of C. capitata in Queensland. Froggatt states, in 1909, that for a long time it was believed that it was not to be found in this part of Aus- tralia, but that, while it might not be abundant, he had specimens 6 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, from Brisbane. Voller, in 1903, mentions Brisbane, Toowoomba, and Warwick as places especially subject to C. capitata attack. Tasmanva.—The Mediterranean fruit fly became established in Tasmania about Launceston during the early part of 1899 and, ac- cording to Lea, attacked apples, pears, and peaches. As the result of a meeting of the Tasmania Council of Agriculture, held on June 1, to discuss correspondence regarding establishment and methods of eradication, a vigorous clean-culture campaign was authorized, which apparently was responsible for the eradication of the pest. No cases of infestation have since been observed in Tasmania fruit. New Zealand.—Kirk states in 1901 that the Mediterranean fruit fly had not, up to that time, appeared in any New Zealand fruit- growing district. Two outbreaks were later recorded, at Blenheim and at Napier, respectively, but were reported to have been quickly stamped out by the destruction of the fruit and treatment of the soil. A third instance of temporary establishment in New Zealand was recorded in 1908 at Davenport. At present the Mediterranean fruit fly is not known to exist in New Zealand. Islands about Australia.—In 1904 Kirk states that he had never reared C. capitata from fruits received in New Zealand from the islands of Suva, Nukualofa, Vavau, Rarotonga, Mangaia, Heratine, and Samoa. BERMUDA ISLANDS. The Mediterranean fruit fly was not recorded from the Bermuda Islands until 1890, when specimens of infested peaches were sent Dr. C. V. Riley. It was known as a pest in Bermuda during the 25 years previous, and is supposed to have become established about 1865, when a.vessel carrying a cargo of fruit from the Mediterranean region, bound for New York, was forced by severe storms to discharge her cargo in Bermuda. WEST INDIES. ’ There are no known records of the presence of Ceratitis capitata in the West Indies. The fact that the Jamaica Botanical Department in 1900 published a bulletin on orange culture and diseases, by Borg, in which reference is made to C. capitata as a pest of the orange, has led some to believe that the Mediterranean fruit fly has become established in Jamaica. The subject-matter of this bulletin was originally presented before the Malta Archeological and Scientific Society and contains nothmg to warrant the conclusion that the author was dealing with the subject except in a most general way, particularly as he speaks of the fly occurring only about the Mediter- ranean. Ballou, in an article published in 1913 on the prevalence of some pests and diseases in the West Indies during 1912, states that ‘‘fruit- fly’ attacks were not so general in Dominica as in former years. The editor of the Review of Applied Entomology erroneously iden- 4 / TIS AL MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 7 tified the ‘‘fruit fly’ as ‘C. capitata.’”’ Ballou has since denied in correspondence that C. capitata was the insect in question. SOUTH AMERICA. Dr. L. O. Howard first identified the Mediterranean fruit fly from South America from specimens reared from peaches sent him by Dr. H. von Ihermg in 1901. Compere, in 1904, and Lounsbury, in 1905, found the pest in the States of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. In 1906 Hempel states that C. capitata was the most common of the fruit flies attacking peaches in Sao Paulo. In writing of fruit culture in Argentina in 1905, Lounsbury states that peaches near Buenos Aires were badly affected by an unde- termined species of fruit fly which he thought likely to be Ceratitis capitata. Silvestri definitely records C. capitaia from Buenos Aires, _ presumably as a result of this statement of Lounsbury. HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. The Mediterranean fruit fly was first observed in- the Hawaiian Islands by Mr. D. T. Fullaway, who captured a living adult in the insectary at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Experiment Station on June 21, 1910. During the followmg September another adult - was captured by Terry and Perkins on the laboratory windows of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Association. Observations made in the field during September by Terry showed that the pest was already established in the Punchbowl] district of Honolulu on oranges and limes, and from that time new records of infestation were rapidly brought to light. By October, 1911, the pest had already become established on the island of Kauai, and was known to exist on Molokai at least by January, 1912, when it was first recorded from the Kohala district of the island of Hawaii. During March, 1912, specimens of infested coffee cherries were reported from the Kona district of Hawaii. The first records of éstablishment in the Puna district of Hawaii were made during March, 1913, when infested oranges and peaches were found at Naalehu and Hilea. Peaches were not reported infested in the Hilo district of Hawaii until the spring of 1914, but soon after infestations were found throughout the Hilo and Hamakua districts. The fruit fly was found established on the Island of Maui by May, 1912. By July, 1914, the Mediterranean fruit fly had spread to every important island of the Hawaiian group, and at present is well established in every village and wild guava scrub examined by the writers. Judging from the rapidity with which this pest has svoread throughout new districts in Hawaii, the writers agree with Ehrhorn that the pest secured its first foothold in Hawaii at Honolulu about 1907, although there are several well- informed horticulturists in Honolulu who believe establishment occurred even one or two years earlier. “AY WMI] Weouvs1IEI poy, ol} JO MOLNIISIP OY} UL LoYJOUR OUO OF UOT}e[oI MOY} PUL UOT}TSOd OAT}LIOI LOY} SULMOYS ‘SpULIS] UeIeMeT oY} Jo dew;—'Z “oI : UDS FAIS yn . SOURCE OF HAWAIIAN INFESTATION. little doubt that the Mediterranean fruit fly was carried SGNV ISI NVIIVAVIL BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. IV OW HES DIQGVUUY Ss There is 8 Before this fruit fly was known to have become established about Honolulu, Compere, as a traveler between Australia and Honolulu, observed C. capitata larve emerging from host fruits stored on the deck of his vessel and plying between the ports of these two countries. MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 9 pupating in the corners of the fruit containers and in secluded spots © about the deck. It would have been quite possible for larve thus emerging to have completed their development during the days re- quired for the voyage between Sydney and Honolulu and emerged as adults while the ship lay at anchor at Honolulu within several hun- dred yards of host fruit trees. As the Mediterranean fruit fly did not become established about Sydney and. the eastern portion of Aus- tralia until 1898-1907, its establishment about Honolulu between 1907 and 1908 came as a natural sequence. This is most forcibly brought to the attention of those interested in horticultural devel- opment when they appreciate the frequency with which this pest has attempted to bridge the Pacific between Honolulu and San Francisco since its establishment at Honolulu, as indicated by the interception of infested fruit at San Francisco by officers of the Federal Horti- cultural Board. CONDITIONS FAVORABLE TO ESTABLISHMENT IN THE HAWAITIAN. ISLANDS. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS IN HONOLULU. The climate of the littoral regions of Hawaii, and up tc an elevation of 1,500 feet, is most favorable to the establishment and rapid increase of C. cayitata. At Honolulu the temperature very rarely drops as low as 58° F., and then only for a few hours during one or two nights in the year. The data in Table I, taken from the monthly meteoro- logical summaries of the U.S. Weather Bureau at Honolulu for 1914, are given as a fairly reliable guide to the ranges in temperature throughout littoral Hawaii. TaBLE I.—Temperature and relatwe humidity at Honolulu during 1914. | Relative hu- Temperature. midity. | Daily range. Mean at 1 \Mean Month. Lor | Maxi-| Mini- mas"! Maxi-| Mini- mum Mean. mum MUI. vaxi-| Mini-| Aver-| 6a. | 2p. | 9p. | and [UU™ mum. mum.jmum.| age.| m. | m. | m. | Min | jmum | COR SIRE Sa Sak SIA SIG] TARO TA MST PE Fal Be (oh real Sno (Gis Pl BS (Bic January. Se at AS ae eh oe Mp 78 60 18 6 | 10 67.4 | 74.0 | 68.9 |269.1 83 50 | 66.4 Mebroaine © ni. . ee 81 61 14 8 | 11.4 | 66.2 | 72:4 | 68.3 | 71.4 82 52 | 70.9 IManchietas 2. soe ae Pak Ss 80 57 15 7 | 10.5 | 67.5 | 74.8 | 89.6 | 70.9 86 53 | 68.6 Jey 0y tl bee epee ye ieee eee ae 82 60 15 7 | 10.7 | 68.6 | 75.8 | 70.9 | 72.5 81 52 | 68.7 INA see So REE Oe a) 83 66 14 6| 9.4 | 72.6 | 79.9 | 74.6 | 74.3 82 56 | 70.1 AEE De Stipes So Bae sel Seger 83 69 12 6| 9.1 | 74.0 | 80.4 | 76.0 | 76.6 80 58 | 68.8 Selliye Sete ee eS 85 70 15 6| 9.2 | 75.2} 81.5 | 76.3 | 78.4 81 62 | 69.6 PAIS hes gee rte So 86 71 12 5 | 9.1 | 76.0) 81.4 | 76.8 | 79.0 80 58 | 69.2 Heptemberts-earsess 222 Sk 87 70 12 6 | 8.1] 75.9 | 80.6 | 77.0 | 78.7 85 62 | 71.4 WMELODEI pm ces see 83 67 14 Tale Oeaa ia56.| TOs tale tole | aia O 74 60 | 68.0 INOVem bet 2-8 2. cee: 83 65 13 Bed OuDs|iwied fone-oep foso | 146 8518452) |. 7085 Wecembers-..5 2... +.) 280 61 14 lel On val Gi. Oilod4s OuO9..7 alr dled 89 | 60 | 72.7 1 Compiled from 1914 and 1915 data, taken from the 1916 Hawaiian Annual. 2 The normal mean for January is 71.1° F a ae 10 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. It will be observed that the daily range is very small, averaging £ between 8 and 11 degrees, and that the normal monthly mean tem- — peratures range between 70.9° and 79° F. In Table II are given the monthly and yearly means, together with the yearly maximum and — minimum temperatures, recorded at different places on the islands of — -Hawaii, Maui, and Oahu, which, at their-respective elevations, repre- _ sent the variations in range of temperature from that in Honolulu, to _ be found at points in Hawai where host fruits are grown. TaBLe II.—Monthly and annual mean and maximum and minimum temperatures of — representative localities in Hawai where host fruits of the Mediterranean fruit fly may be 7 grown. F : Monthly mean temperatures. Annual.° : a |3 M | B.3/Sd i 3 | A0/aod | Locality. | is ; aevise a BS S S| & 23iso am aS) S bat a a 7 Te} ESD ola = H Ss : e g oO | _ |e Blas & f S |e) pias : Seen aed 0\20 | p |B Sizlelsi/elalel|sl2)sisssca 2 \|sleo|Sl/als|sl[s|/s/2 s/s] s]s wees & ASI ls#l ls els (6 /alalola\i/aljsae wp |= =< 2a sierra r Island of Oahu: Heet.:| ° Fe) OB) OB) 2 FOULS BE O oF Oo Be |e Hall och cuales eles Maal ored bonnie Honolulu =e eee eee 111)70. 0/69. 7|71. 4/73. 3|74. 3/75. 3/76. 4178. 1/76. 875. 2174. 7/72. 4|74.0} 85) 58 Waal ery Mia eee eee 30/70. 4/68. 7/71. 0/72. 7/73. 4\74. 4/75. 8)77. 0/75. ie 9172-8170. 5/73. 0) 91) 55 Wialanaece es. poe ee ese 6|71. 370. 4|71. 9/73. 8\74. 8)77. 3/79. 2 80. 0,79. 3/75. 5|74. 8/73. 275.1] 91) 52 ef Schofield Barracks. -.-....--- 990/66. 6 65. 8/67. 4/68. 9/69. 8/71. 0/73. 0|74. 0)73. 271. 2/66. 4/68. 1/69.6] 89) 51 Tantalus Heights. ....-..-- | 1, 300/63. 6 64. 1/66. 3/67. 2/68. 0|67. 7|69. 3/70. 4/69. 1/68. 5/67. 4/65. 6/67. 3} 84) 54 ? Island of Maui: | ;. Kaanapaliz es oases 12/70. 2.70. 4/71. 4|74. 0/76. 077. 3/79. 3\80. 0/79. 4/76. 5/75. 2/73. 0/75. 2) 92) 57 z Wiailuku eee eee: 250!68. 8 69. 2/69. 8'72. 2/73. 074. 1)75. 5/77. Al75, 8)74. 0172. 8/70. 9)72. 8] 89! 56 Haiti < Se Se ae ee ee | 700/67. 2/67. 2/68. 6/69. 6|70. 7\70. 7/72. 8/74. 2/72. 4/71. 8/70. 4/68. 7|70.4| 83] 57 ; Island of Hawaii: Tost) Sees eee ee ee 100|68. 4/68. 7/69. 470. 8|71. 3/72. 4/74. 0/74. 6/73. 8)73. 0/71. 4|69. 6\71.4| 88] 55 HOnOkaat ae apes eres 470/67. 6/67. 8/70. 1/71. 0\72. 3/72. 6/73. 4|74. 6:72. 8/72. 4/71. 2/69. 0/71. 2) 90) 53 HOA aes a ee 1, 350/67. 0/66. 6/66. 7/68. 8)68. 3,69. 4/70. 8,71. 2/70. 8/69. 4/68. 266. 2.68.6} 84) 51 Puen ul ets :is eer oases ee 2, 000/65. 2/65. 4/66. 4'68. 3/68. 6/70. 1/72. 6,73. 371. 7/69. 8/68. 8/66. 8.68.9] 87] 50 Pahalaves seer eee nee 850/68. 6/68. 4/68. 7/71. 2/71, 2/72. 1/74. 0/75. 2/74. 9/73. 0/72. 4/72. 0\71. 8) 91) 53 On al aVial ee ere eae 270/68. 4/67. 9/69. 7/70. 9]72. 2|72. 6|74. 2\75. 2/74. 2/73.1)71.7|70.271.7| 86] 54 Wallin ea 2 2 eae eee 2, 720/58. 6)60. 4/62. 0.61. 9/61. 9 61. 8.63. 6 65. 1/68. 7)64. 2/61. 7/60.4.62.1} 80] 44 ; WoleanovEHouse) sass 4, 00057. 8/58. 6/59. 0/59. 6/59. 2 60. 1/60. Hee si 3/61. 0/60. 8,60. pe 6} 72} 42 ; | Biological work has shown that even the lowest monthly means of localities up to 1,500 feet elevation have little effect upon C. capitata other than to retard development somewhat. It is never cold enough throughout littoral Hawaii to render either the adults or the larve inactive. Asaresult there are no periods of the year at any Hawaiian port when the climatic conditions are unfavorable for the establish- ment or increase of this pest. Data presented later in the text indicate that a continuous temperature ranging between 58° and 62° F-., or the lowest range of temperature usually experienced in littoral Hawai, does not increase the normal mortality among the immature stages of the fruit fly, and that these stages withstand for short periods, with- out injury, temperatures lower than any recorded in Table Il. The two stations, Holualoa and Huehue, at about 1,350 and 2,000 feet elevation, respectively, may be taken as fair examples of altitudes above which host fruits are only scatteringly grown, but at which the’ fruit fly has demonstrated its capacity to injure fruits seriously. : : ee) lt me. MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWATITI. 1] HOST CONDITIONS. Favorable as are the climatic conditions for the establishment and increase of the Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii, the host conditions are even more so. Mr. H. J. Quayle, who has studied fruit-fly con- ditions throughout southern Europe, and Mr. J. C. Bridwell, who has had similar opportunities in western and southern Africa and in Aus- tralia, have stated to the writers that nowhere have they found host conditions so favorable for establishment and rapid increase as in littoral Hawaii, especially about Honolulu and Hilo. Under the sub- ject of host fruits, on page 24, the writers record 72 species of fruits growing in Honolulu that are subject to attack by C. capitata. The discussion of their susceptibility to attack, however, throws little light upon their numerical abundance or upon the seasons of the year during which their fruit is available for fruit-fly infestation. During the clean-culture campaign waged against this pest m Honolulu during 1913, data were secured which forcibly demonstrate the ideal host conditions found in Honolulu, making possible extraordinary increase and excessive infestations. The residents of Honolulu are justly proud of their magnificent vegetation and have taken great pleasure in growing an unusually large assortment of trees and shrubs upon their town properties. An inventory of such trees and shrubs, that bear fruits subject to infestation, growing upon 60 blocks in that portion of Honolulu bounded by Liliha, Punchbowl, Beretania, and School streets, is given in Table III. TaBLE IIIT.— Number of host trees and shrubs of the Mediterranean fruit fly growing during 1918 in that portion of Honolulu bounded by Liltha, Punchbowl, Beretania, and School streets. Lots | Trees Lots | Trees | Lots | Trees Lots | Trees Block. in in Block. in in || Block. in in Block. in in block. | block. block. | block. | block. | block. block. | block. — | = 1 19 81 16 18 90 31 7 19 46 9 160 2 10 64 17 6 13 32 10 62 47 4 51 3 10 105 18 5 20 33 5 10 || 48 15 217 4 3 19 23 101 | 34 5 22 49 23 167 5 16 137 20 12 48 | 35 5 9 50 6 111 6 9 28 pak 18 118 | 36 8 51 51 16 112 7 9 64 22 | 7 59 37 14 134 52 9 41 8 4 59 23 | 3 0 38 13 | 108 53 5 65 9 6 18 24 | 14 75 | 39 41 115 54 14 83 10 9 124 25 3 8 | 40 12 74 55 23 112 11 28 132 26 7 25 | 41 36 135 56 | 26 158 12 6 163 27 4 7 | 42 17 76 57 12 37 13 9 66 28 4 15 | 43 18 208 58 | 4 0 14 9 66 29 9 42 | 44 24 144 59 j 3 124 15 25 86 30 2 39 | 45 9 54 60} 12 98 J Total number of lots in 60 blocks, 712; total number of trees, 4,610; average number of trees per lot, 6.5; average number of trees per block, 76.8. From this it will be seen that there was a total of 4,610 trees and shrubs on the 712 lots under consideration, or an average of 6.5 trees per dooryard capable of supporting the fruit fly. In Table IV are given data indicating the relative abundance of different hosts. 1 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Taste 1V.—Number and specees of host trees of the Mediterranean fruit fly growing in that portion of Honolulu covered by Table IIT. ASpriCole. crc Lj Wig cp orsas ek ao ceee 201 | Mandarin........- 28 | Rose apple..-...... 25 INVOCROWeepaaeoase 653 | Guava, common... O45 | Mangos coc -- -sesa- 1164 | "Sapodilia s55-=ee= 5 Breadfruit .......- 58 | Guava, strawberry 73 | Mangosteen.....-- G\eSap0tarre =e eeerse 30 Carambala........ 48 | Java plum........ 80 | Mountain appie..-. 40) SSOUTSOD=s=- sense 57 Chinese inkberry. 6 | Kamani, ball. .... 4 | Mock orange....--. 33 | Spanish cherry... 1 Chinese orange.-.. 148 | Kamani, winged-. 13 | Orange, sweet.... 3/2] Starapple-.__-..- 4 Cofiee . s245 Sees 298 | Kumquat........- 4, Papaya jo: ae 687 | Surinam cherry... 63 Coffee, Liberian... 3) |, JUSTO NSS Soeee sess on Rea hen eee 69) Wik eee 19 Cottone2eeeee ee TM Walcot Divelalere seg ae rare 40 | Pear, Bartlett..... 2| Waiawal.......... 60 Custard apple..-... Tilly Tagan ey Bea Ay Sea ear 10 | Pomegranate..... 128 —— Damson plum.... Ae WOgQuateseessceaee 33) | ;bomelozeces..2esee 15 | Totalza--ee 4,610 In Hilo, island of Hawaii, host conditions are quite as favorable for fruit-fly development as in Honolulu. Thus the folowing numbers of host trees and shrubs were found in certain yards of Hilo during March, 1914: YARD 1. YARD 2. YARD 3. YARD 4, 1 Rose apple.! 2 Surinam cherry. 11 Rose apple. 4 Peach. 4Surinam cherry. 2 Papaya. 2 Mango. 6 Mango. 2 Japanese plum 1 Thevetia. 3 Thevetia. 1 Loquat. 6 Mountainapple. 2 Orange. 1 Avocado. 3 Winged kamani. 1 Star apple. 2 Strawberry guava. 2 Surinam cherry. 34 Coffee trees. 14 Coffee. ; 1 Strawberry guava. 20 Common guava. Bananas. 15 Brazilian banana. 2 Avocado. 4 Avocado. 1 Peach. 3 Mango 3 Fig. 2 Papaya. 2 Mountain apple. 5 Orange 2 Lichee nut. 1 Peach. 3 Common guava. 1 Grape. 1 Winged kamani. - 1 Mangosteen. 1 Fig. 1 Mimusops. There is no time in Hawaii when fruits are entirely out of season. The fact that several hosts, such as the Chinese orange (Citrus japonica), Surmam cherry (Lugena michel), and mock orange (Murraya exotica), bear several crops a year, while others, such as certain specimens of ball kamani (Calophyllum inophyllum) (Pl. VI) and winged kamani (Terminala catappa) (Pl. XTX), appear to be sel- dom entirely free from ripening fruits, assures food for the fruit fly the year round. | The succession of fruits is also increased by the individuality of trees of the same species, or even of certain branches of a single tree, which results in a very uneven ripening of the fruit. While the data in Table V do not indicate the seasonal abundance of host fruits, they have been summarized from the collections of clean-culture inspectors made during 1913 to show the remarkable succession of host fruits found ripening in greater or less quantities throughout 1 For scientific names of fruits see section on host fruits, p. 24. Bul. 536, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE ll. RELATION OF FLORA OF HAWAIIAN ISLANDS TO THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY. Fic. 1.—Men grubbing out a guava scrub which has taken possession of pasture land. Many thousands of acres are thus overrun in Hawaii and furnish excellent breeding grounds for the fruit fly. The ripening fruits fall into the dense grass and the larvee within them develop unmolested by the heat of thesun. Fia. 2.—Thickets of guava bushes often crowd upon the country roads and ripen tons of fruit. This fruitis gathered by pedestrians and autoists and carried to all parts oi the islands, thus becoming a medium for the wide dissemination ofthe pest. (Original.) PLATE III . of Agriculture. . Dept Bul. 536, U.S (yeurst1Q) *syrnay Sou prt Ut poyuorjue AySnos0y} st Ay yINAy OY) pUNossyorq OY} UT SUTeyUNOU pory{ns pue snoyrdroosd oy} ynoysnosyy, *1vod orryuo oY ynoysnosyy 410ddns s}f Joy pooy ‘sysoy oso) JO syInay suruedras oy} Ul ‘spuy Ay qinay oyy soovr{d yons uy “seedy VIpeurUtiey, osavy Auvu ore 194090 OY) UT OIA ‘VACHS JO S}OYOLY Osuop “4jJoy pure JUSTIA OY) Ye ‘SULMOIS Ov “ULODO EY PUG PUNOASeJOJ OY) UL ploy o[ddvourd oy UoeM4oq ‘UoTyeI\SNIIE eAoge ey} ul “Ay 4fhay oy} Jo sysoy pliM AQ popunodans Ajoso[o you oae yey} dodo Aue jo sppoy poyeary(no WeMeyy UL puy 04 4[NoyJTp SI IT "Ald LINGUA NVANVYYALIGSIA] SHL OL SGNVIS| NVIIVMVH SHL SO VYOT4Y SHL SO NOILVIAY Ot OE Pest, 2 pees | Bul. 536, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE IV. THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY. Fie. 1.—A dense forest growth of the mountain apple (Jambosa malaccensis) near Hilo, which illustrates one of the many strongholds in Hawaii that the fruit fly found favorable to its thorough entrenchment. Fic. 2.—Rose apple trees (Hugenia jambos). While the fruit of this tree ripens chiefly during the months of March to May, afew may be found beneath trees at any time. Fruits of both the mountain apple and the rose apple are among a Class of host fruits that are carelessly taken on board ships by tourists, in whose possession they have Cork oe by the officers of the Federal Horticultural Board at San Francisco. riginal. Bul. 536, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE V. THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY AND THE COFFEE INDUSTRY. Fia. 1.—Coffee plantation on the Kona slopes of Hawaii. Fie. 2.—A fruiting branch. Fia.3.—Low type of coffee tree. Fic. 4.—Coffee cherry cut to show the two large beans which are of-commercial value, and the very thin outer pulp. This pulp is the only portion of the cherry eaten by the fruit-fly larve. Note that the well-grown larvee illustrated feed so close to the papery epidermis that parasites have no difficulty in ovipositing in them. Thousands of acres are densely planted to coffee on the island of Hawaii and offer food for the fruit fly the year round. (Original.) MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 13 the year in Honolulu. The presence of so much ripening fruit, coupled with the favorable climatic conditions and the hardiness cf the fruit fly itself, has made the establishment of C. capitata and its multiplication a most easy problem within the city limits. While the fruit fly finds host conditions most favorable within the city limits, because of the large number of host trees and shrubs, some of which are bearing at all seasons of the year, it has been able to establish itself and multiply in the country, often miles from towns, in some one or more of its hosts which have escaped cultivation, and to have spread over uncultivated and uncultivable areas. Of such hosts, the, common guava (Psidium guayava) is the most abundant. It has taken possession of the roadsides, pastures (PI. II), vacant town lots, mountain gulches and hillsides, and even crevices in precipices, from sea level up to 1,500 feet elevation.1 So easily does this plant grow from seed, and so thoroughly distributed are its seeds by cattle, birds, and man, that it is seldom that a bush can not be found within a stone’s throw. In the lowland pastures and mountain gulches up to an elevation of at least 1,300 feet, particularly when sheltered from strong winds and well watered, the guava may become very treelike and form dense thickets (Pl. II]). At higher altitudes, and in wind-swept or arid areas, it may remain a low, scrubby bush. While the guava fruits most heavily during the spring and fall months, the bushes are continually blooming and ripening a sufficient number of fruits to support the fruit fly every month in the year. The writers are depending upon the illus- trations to acquaint the reader, as words can not, with the well- nigh universal distribution of this host and the wonderful oppor- tunities it offers C. capitata for easy establishment and thorough intrenchment. Second to the guava as a host occurring in wild, uncultivated areas is the prickly-pear cactus (Opuntia vulgaris) (Pl. XVII). While the fruits of this plant are not preferred by the Mediterranean fruit fly, they are sufficiently infested in the absence of more favored hosts to serve as food, and, as in the case of the guava, there is almost no time during the year when a few ripe fruits may not be found in any cactus scrub. Other host fruits, wild or escaped, are not so universally distrib- uted. As a few of the many examples, there may be mentioned a grove of ball kamani trees in an isolated valley on the island of Molokai, gulches overgrown with the passion vine (Passzjlora sp.) and the damson plum (Chrysophyllum oliviforme) on the island of Maw, the thickets of winged kamani growing along the windward shores of the island of Oahu, and the wild coffee and mountain apple (Pl. IV, fig. 1) in the forests of Oahu and Hawan. 1 Stunted bushes have been observed at 4,000 feet elevation. 14 in Honolulu collected various fruits infested by the . re campaign Mediterranean fruit fly. TasLeE V.—Data indicating the seasons of the year when inspectors of the clean-cultu BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 1 This table is not intended to indicate the seasonal abundance of host fruits. "T8-€6 00 | KKH SK UK KKK KKK MM KM K KKK OK K KKK "IZ-OT 00 | KKK fH tM OK K HK OM KKK OOK KM OK TK MK "71-600 | HHH SM IKK MMM IMM KM OM OIKM DR MMM: ‘LG 00d | KKK tH IKK KKH KKM KK KKK ORR OK MRK Ee “ORGS "AON | SHH fh CM MMMM 8 8 SM Si le SMM es “EC-RTCAON | SHH fh CMM IMM UKM MMMM oe bt fee Speke os "QI-IT "AON | iH 2h th OK RM EMM OM be fot tM cM “GL -AON: | 1 = 34)b4 "seas paiea bg aba sla) Paps aba aba es ae ips bea ‘T*AON-Z°900 | tHM TM IK OK MMMM DKK IMM iM DD oR KKH OD "7-06 100 | HK “HR SRR Cee eae eae "SI-€1 100 | th HM TK EM EMM DK EM FoR EK RK KK T1-9°900 | :hH th IMM KM MK KS OM OK 8 te COMM MM "6400-60 '3deg | KKM KK IK IKK KKM tM KKK OOK HK IKK MMR "1-66 9d9g | KKK Kh IKK IM KKH DEM ERK DRM IMM KM 0c-ST-3deg | HHH WMH ik S SoM KR De SMe SOM CRM MK : "eI-g-ydog | MMH KK IMM CMM KM fh tuk CMM DKK MMM "9-1 -4dog |- MKH Sh IMM EMH SS OM K ORK KKM SKM HR : "0G-G2"SNV | KMK fh tM SEK K 8 SM SMa 8 OM tf CK MK MK “ee-e1 any | HHH KK Shhh Ke Mk eee een: ‘LI shy | MMH RH PHM OMe OM hh Dee OM RMR “6p Sty | Wie alts She el ee 2 paid Oe ba) oe ei ‘gsny-9¢ 4p | MH IM IMM MMM DM DK ODM MH IMM DMM “9¢-1Z ANE. | KwMM 8H OK oth OK SK BM eM Oe OM MH: “61-71 Aqne | KHIR 8h OK TKK TSR Rh KKM RH ORR “GEL AqUue |, Pals ied) Wes ae stpaia ts eaipalice bali ipal pails pa esaeipa eae tates ‘¢Atnp-ogoung | Wik SM te DIMM DM IK DMM IR oe IK: "ge-egoung | fi fh EM DMM EE MMA KKK DK DKK KKK "TZ-OT Oumig | pa spas Taipei wea e ba ala pales eal pail Paes | SENG I Ook ean ia wid ent cap aep aid cpa peenl hig RAR oie i *1=@ oun | a Se ee eS eS ei Se "T8097 ACHE [2 2 SL Ibe bd 8 dd Bd eT nd eee ‘HC-6L ACW | KIM OTK KK DKK OOK MK RK OM MK “2T-CL ACW | tf tH SHAM MMMM DOK OM KM ORK MMR: "OI-G ACW | StH TKK KKK HM DMM MK MMR "ge ACW-BSZ dy | HK SKK KK EK KK KKM KKK DKK KRM | QZ-1S "Idy | 3: tH ft HM MH OK KKM HMR OM MMR | @I-FT-ady [| thw th MK HM IMM IDK IKK MM MKD Mee KM: "GI-L“Idy | $M MMM OM CM Od Od dd od | “g-idy-1e sew [| Hox. id MMMM OMe MMMM eee ln ar a ee "ZE-LL AGIN Wins Falbd ecssrdiane baipdipa pals easiralps) Paes bai parquet pal aed a Parana “CLOl ie | oH SKM HH KH KR KHMER eRe; "SEUCN| AK EK KKK KKK OOM MK ERK MK OMS: "TUR PS°Q0T | KKK SKK KKK MK DKK MK KKK RH DK MK "CLT G0q | ihK SHKK HK IMM KKK RRM od ee od "GT-O1 G00 | iHM IHK KKK KKK KH HK OX KKM OR Ro: | "S-e°qoq | iM tHMMH IKRM ORM ME MMM MH Se SH beh ci: ‘T"qeq-1~ "uve | KHH SHKK HHRMA MRM eM SR: “CC-0G UCL | THK TKK MMM MMMM MMM tee ta te | ‘gL-el Utl| fH IMM MK MMMM MMM MMMM OM MM ‘TI-Tauee | thw TKK KK KKM OM KKH OOK KEK fb bw MK igSlighiiliiilii@iibiiiibiiigs A GEMS eae lcen erate Sey ptnu emo teic| sn 2 i259 TES ig eg lida Li igge tig ese Seay Shoo (88 S088 ig Sees eR eR es cass | SREDEEES [PRERE CoSEE SS RE 2 ne Se BEBE | 4500 SAGMOOMMA SS SOR MMA mama ss Mae MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 15 In addition to the wild fruits in country places, the fruit fly finds _ strongholds in the many, and often very isolated, native-home sites scattered throughout the littoral regions. About these may be growing the mango (PI. XII), rose apple (PI. IV, fig. 2), orange, peach, avocado, ball and winged kamanis, etc. In the Kona district of the island of Hawaii there are large areas containing thousands of acres of coffee under cultivation (PI. V) in which the fruit fly finds food in the pulp of the ripening cherries at all seasons of the year because of the irregularity in blooming and the long harvesting season due to the varying altitudes at which coffee is grown. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE. The economic importance of the Mediterranean fruit fly as a pest of fruits varies with the climate of its habitat. Thus in France, near Paris, where it has been known to attack apricots, pears, and peaches, it has not become a serious pest because of climatic checks, and such checks to the severity of its attack have been noted in portions of Australia and South Africa and would be operative in _ continental United States, except in parts of California and of the Southern States. On the other hand, in tropical and semitropical climates this fruit fly is capable of becoming a pest of prime impor- tance and, as in the Hawatan Islands, may be classed as the most important insect check to horticultural development. host, the signs of infestation increase rapidly. The suns S about the punctures of tender-fleshed fruits may increase untu «ie entire fruit has a collapsed appearance. J In all fruits well infested within there is a ‘‘give”’ to the area be- neath the puncture, indicating destroyed tissues beneath. In hard- fleshed fruits such as some varieties of apples (PI. XI, fig. 2), pears, and quinces there may be no external evidence of larval work except — a ring of dark decay about the puncture, and yet the outer portion of the pulp alone may be unaffected. Peaches are often thoroughly infested within and still maintain their normal shape and give evi- dence of infestation only by a dull and slightly darkened color of the skin. A hole in the rind, no larger than the lead of a pencil, from which juice exudes when the fruit is compressed, may be the only indication of infestation in oranges and grapefruit, although rings of decay usually develop in infested citrus fruits containing numerous larve. Fruits of the elengi tree (Jémusops elengi), which have an orange shell-like exterior (Pl. VIII, fig. 2), may appear normal, but on being broken open are found to be literally packed with well- erown larve. It is never possible for the average man to examine casually any host fruit and state conclusively that it is not infested. METHODS OF SPREAD. There are numerous records on file which demonstrate clearly the methods by which the Mediterranean fruit fly is spread, not only between widely separated countries, but about land areas. The development of rapid transit and cold storage and the increase in tourist travel have been the greatest factors in dissemination in more recent times.. Geographical. isolation is no longer a protection against introduction, as has been proved almost monthly by the interception of fruit flies at the ports of entry of the United States by the agents of the Federal Horticultural Board. SHIPS. The unrestricted consignments of fruit and ships’ stores have been responsible for much of the spread of C. capitata between coun- tries. MacLeay, as early as 1829, records the importation at London of cargoes of oranges from the Azores that contained larve, and Middleton, in 1914, states that in the same city hundreds of larve and pupe are imported every year from Spain and destroyed Ria MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 19 in the manufacture of marmalade. The establishment of C. capitata © in both the eastern and western parts of the Australian continent is traceable to the development of cold storage and rapid ocean transportation which made possible the large exports of citrus fruits from the Mediterranean region to Australia. Kirk records the — receipt at Auckland, New Zealand, of a case of peaches from Cape Colony which contained living larve, although they had been en route in cool storage for four weeks. The same writer intercepted 47 cases of infested apples at Wellington, New Zealand, imported from New South Wales. Lea, in 1908, states that larve of C. capitata were seen in numbers every year in fruit imported into Tasmania from Sydney. The establishment of this pest in the Bermudas and South America is beyond doubt the result of the importation of infested fruit from Mediterranean regions. Increased knowledge of fruit flies and the quarantines in force in several countries now make the introduction of this pest in consignments of fruits less likely. The vigilant work of the quarantine officials at the Pacific ports of the United States, however, demonstrates the grave danger that still exists of introducing the Mediterranean fruit fly in ships’ stores. Instances of the discovery and destruction of the pest in fruits in ships’ stores on vessels entering the port of San Francisco during the past four years are recorded in the reports of Frederick Maskew, chief quarantine officer of the California Horticultural Commission and collaborator of the Federal Horticultural Board. TOURISTS. The desire on the part of tourists to carry to their friends at home specimens of exotic fruits is at the present time the most likely avenue for the introduction of this fruit fly into California as well as the southern United States. This has been clearly proved not only by the large variety of host fruits offered for inspection at Honolulu, but by the interceptions at the California ports. To the quarantine officer the tourist is a difficult problem. Fruits carried in containers are easily observed, but smaller fruits are found with difficulty. Strong, in 1918, discovered in the overcoat pocket of a tourist landing at San Francisco infested nuts of the winged kamani (Terminalia catappa), which were intended for planting in southern California. In like manner infested coffee cherries were found at Honolulu in the pocket of a gentleman about to sail during February, 1916, from Honolulu direct to San Pedro, Cal. DISSEMINATION GN LAND BY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CONVEYANCES. On land, railroads, automobiles, hawkers’ carts, carriages, etc., are all responsible for much spread. The fact that host fruits only slightly infested appear normal to the average man leads to the pur- 20 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. chase by the traveling public of much fruit which later, when found to be infested, is discarded, often many miles from the point of origin. Bairstow as long ago as 1893 records the selling of infested apricots by native girls to passengers on trains about to leave for interior points of South Africa. The spread of the pest in Australia has been most rapid along the-railroads. French, in 1896, states that peaches imported by rail into Victoria from Sydney were infested and Newman states that in Western Australia many instances have come under his observation in which infested fruits thrown from the windows of coaches of both suburban and country trains were re- sponsible for introductions into districts previously free from attack. In the Hawaiian Islands the spread from village to village and from island to island unquestionably has been hastened by the habit of the poorer population of carrying small lots of fruit in their travels, either for food while en route or as presents for their friends. Much of this fruit is more or less infested, and when an attempt to eat it proves the interior to be infested and unpalatable, it is discarded either along the road or at the point of destination. The inspection service of the Hawaiian Board of Agriculture has shown that even the most stringent regulations have not prevented the movement of infested fruits from point to point by man in automobiles, in carriages, or on foot. POSTAL AND EXPRESS PACKAGES. The interception at Washington, D. C., by officers of the Federal Horticultural Board of a package from Mexico containing a living pupa of the papaya fruit fly ( Toxotrypana curvicauda Gerst.) attached to an unknown vine, and of a living adult of the olive fruit fly (Dacus oleae Rossi) and a dead adult of another species of fruit fly, apparently Dacus semispharens Becker, in a package of olive seed, 28 days after it had been mailed in South Africa, indicates the possibilities for spread by means of parcel post. The persistency with which unin- formed persons insist upon including among bananas and pineapples intended for shipment by express from Hawaii to the mainland United States small contraband host fruits has demonstrated fully the danger of express packages as carriers of. C. capitata. NURSERY STOCK. A fruit-fly pupa (species unknown) was found at Auckland, New Zealand, in the soil about the roots of a plant imported from Australia. Newman has called attention to the danger of spreading the fruit fly in the pupa stage, in the soil about the roots of nursery stock grown beneath host fruit trees. | PACKING MATERIALS. Larve developing in fruits packed in wooden crates or in bags often pupate against the sides of such contaimers. Second-hand ~ MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. DAL packing crates and old burlap, etc., recently used as containers are | _ apt to carry the pest and should be guarded against until experience for the locality and temperature concerned has proved that the adults have emerged. Certain instances of spread in western Aus- tralia are believed to have occurred through carelessness in the use of second-hand packing cases. In Hawaii, Hilo grass (Paspalum conjugatum), gathered from beneath guava bushes (PI. XIV, fig. 1, in- sert), was discontinued as a packing material for bananas for fear pupe of the fruit fly attached to it might reach California. COLD STORAGE. While cold-storage temperatures may be used to render fruits free from danger as transporters of the fruit fly (see p. 108), the use of temperatures fluctuating above 38° F. may be one of the greatest aids in prolonging the duration of fruit-fly life within host fruits. WIND. That adult males of the Mediterranean fruit fly can be carried by the wind distances varying from one-fourth to 14 miles from points of liberation has been demonstrated by Severin, who states further that in all probability some of the flies which he had set free at the head of Manoa Valley “were caught up and carried far into the city of Honolulu, or even away beyond into the sea, miles away from the points of liberation.” The writers agree with Severin as to the ability of winds to carry adults considerable distances. The dis- covery by Mr. H. T. Osborn of an adult upon the summit of Kona- huanui (elevation 3,105 feet), the highest peak of the range separating the windward and leeward sides of the island of Oahu, and at a con- siderable distance above the highest range of host plants, makes it easier for the writers to believe that the few adults which they captured in traps in the scant vegetation on the leeward shore line, and at considerable distances from known sources of infestation, during very windy weather, were specimens caught on the windward side in strong ascending air currents and carried entirely across Oahu. There is no doubt that the adult on Konahuanui observed by Osborn was transported thus from the lower windward levels. HOST FRUITS. The writers know of no edible fruit commonly grown in the Hawaiian Islands, except the pineapple, that is not subject to attack by the Mediterranean fruit fly. From a practical trade standpoint the banana should not be considered a host when grown and shipped in accordance with the regulations of the Federal Horticultural Board. : 22, BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. FRUITS ERRONEOUSLY LISTED AS HOSTS. No infestation has been found in pineapples (Ananas sativus), banyan (Ficus indica), pride of India or chinaberry (Melia azedarach), noni (Morinda citrifolia), jujube (Zizyphus jujuba), mulberry (Morus nigra), tamarind pods (Tamarindus indica), wine palm (Caryota ureus), Ixora coccinea, Canarium commune, Sideroxylon sanduichensis, mammee apple (Mammea americana), durion (Durio zibethinus), Cape gooseberry or poha (Physalis peruviana), ohelo berry (Vaccinium reticulatum), kukui nut or candlenut tree (Aleurites moluccana), night-blooming cereus (Cereus triangularis), and jack fruit (Artocarpus integrifolia). PINEAPPLE. The pineapple (Ananas sativus) is not a host fruit of the Mediter- ranean fruit fly in Hawai. Negative data are given here because - of the persistent reports that this fruit is subject to fruit-fly attack. Ilingsworth reared the pineapple fruit fly (Dacus xanthodes Broun) from pineapples in Fiji in 1913. In 1904 Kirk states that he had reared only the Queensland fruit fly (Dacus tryona Frogg.) from pine- apples exported from Queensland into New Zealand. In 1908 Kirk again states that Dacus zanthodes was commonly found in pineapples and oranges froui Fiji and Rarotonga entering New Zealand. Gowdey, in 1913, reports rearmg C. capitata from pineapples in Uganda, British East Africa. So far as the writers are aware no data have ever been published from careful experiments to determine the true status of the pineapple as a host fruit, and the writers know of no positive evidence that C. capitata has ever been reared from this fruit. It is certain that during a period of over three years not one of seven entomologists in Honolulu has succeeded in rearing adults from this fruit. Fullaway, of the United States Experiment Station, obtained negative results from fruits placed in a large cage. The market and plantation inspectors of the Federal Horticultural Board have brought to the office during the past three years many partially decayed fruits, but no fruit flies were reared from them, although many decay flies were. Although pineapples are grown profitably - only under the best horticultural conditions (Pl. III), none of the developing fruits are sufficiently isolated from other varieties of host fruits affected to warrant the belief that adult fruit flies are not present in large enough numbers to infest each fruit were the pine- apple susceptible to infestation. In an attempt to force an infestation within the laboratory, 50 ripe pineapples were placed either singly or by twos in large glass jars con- taining from 300 to 500 adult flies in a mature egg-laying condition, and allowed to remain with the flies from 2 to 4 days. The pineapples were then removed and placed over sand in covered jars. No flies MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 23 were reared from the fruits. The flies readily deposited eggs in apples _ placed with them both before and after exposure of the pineapples. A record of the time each of the 50 fruits was exposed is as follows: TaBLE VI.—Nonsusceptibility of pineapples to the attack of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Number of Number of fruits patos oFes ausire to fruit flies exposed. : reared. 913. Deiat oss OchiT4ts ae a 1 DiS eee ea Octslielee == nL era aes eek TOS92 VEL Is Dee DESI 2 ae Cia232 74 eee Gin a None. 110i Oct. 30-Nov. 22. = | Dae ere INOW OS(s oes eee ioe eee INOW gO id reece = During July 18-20, 1913, a very ripe pineapple was hung in a jar containing flies. An examination of the fruit after this two-day exposure revealed 2 punctures in the pulp containing respectively 16 and 11 eggs. One puncture had been made in a slight abrasion; the other in normal tissue between the eyes. Seven other batches of eggs, containing 9, 5, 8, 7, 4, 5, and 4 eggs, respectively, had been deposited on the surface of the fruit, but in the creases between the eyes. In experimental work the writers have had no difficulty in trans- ferring larve from one favored host fruit to another. Experiments in transferring first, second, and third stage larve to pineapple invariably resulted in the death of the larva. A total of 925 larve were transferred, as follows: 7 TaBLeE VIl.—Failure of larve of the Mediterranean fruit fly to develop in the pulp of ripe pineapples. Number = Date of transfer. larvee duster y 8 Results. transferred. eeu. INDUS 22 oe see ee eee we 150 EB SOCON Cte ese ene All Ged by Apr. 26. AGO) Shey 2 eee eae a aE 200] | See dose asa s- ADR oo et see eee LOO: SRATS Glee see - 5 All died by Apr. 24 IDO reas Zon SCCONC se sm aes 19 dead by Apr. 25; 6 dead by Apr. 26. DOs seas See 15 OW Svounesthindis === a" All dead by Apr. 25. NDT Zoe oe es SN 150, eee Ose ate ey eet Do. ANT Doma eee et a 150 | Well grow WW HOUIKG leer | Do. While the experiments above reported indicate that under forced laboratory conditions a few eggs may be deposited within the pulp of very ripe pineapples, the failure of all stages of the larve to survive in a medium of fresh ripe pineapple pulp is conclusive evidence that the pineapple should be dropped from lists of host fruits of the Med- iterranean fruit fly. BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. PROVEN HOSTS IN HAWAII. Adults of the Mediterranean fruit fly have been reared from the fruits of the trees, shrubs, and vegetables in the following list. The hosts are arranged alphabetically according to scientific name, and not according to the preferences shown by the fruit fly. The numbers in parentheses refer to the degree of preference for each fruit as a host. Fruits that are heavily or generally infested are marked (1), those that serve occasionally as hosts or of which many escape infestation are marked (2), while those rarely infested are marked (8). The writers appreciate that differences of opinion may arise over any classification of hosts according to degree of infestation, and realize that in colder climates than Hawaii some of the fruits classed as (2) would fall into class 3, or even might not be recorded as hosts at all. The list following represents conditions in littoral Hawaii, particularly about Honolulu: Hosts of Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii. Scientific name. Common name. | Scientific name. Common name. | 1, Achras sapota (3)........-- Sapodilla. 38. Garcinia mangostana (2). ..| Mangosteen. 2. Acordia sp. (3) =z. 23-2 2- Acordia. 39. Garcinia ranthochymus (2) -| Mangosteen. 3. Anona muricata (2)........ Sour sop: 40. Gossypium spp. (2)...----- Cultivated cotton. 4, Arenga saccharifera (3)....- Sugar pel 41. Jambosa malaccensis (2)...| Mountain apple. 5. Artocarpus incisa (3)..--.--- Breadfruit. 42. Latania l6ddigesii (3)..-.---- Blue palm. 6. Averrhoa carambola (2)... ..| Carambola. 43. Lycopersicum esculentum | Tomato. 7. Calophyllum inophyllum (1)| Ball kamani. 2). 8. Capsicum annuum var. | Bell pepper. 44, Litchi chinensis (3).......-- Lichee nut. grossum (2). 45. Mangifera indica (1)......- Mango. 9. Carica papaya (2)........-- Papaya. 46. Mimusops elengi (1)-..-..-.-- Elengi tree. 10. Carica quercifolia (2)..-..--- Dwarf papaya. 47. Murraya exotica (1)....-.--- Mock orange. 11. Carissa arduina (2).....--. Carissa. AS = Mise Sppsi(3) = <-ta- e Banana. | 12. Casimiroa edulis (1)......-- Sapota. 49. Noronhia emarginata (3). --| Noronhia. 13: (Cestrum:sp. (8)s-2 52252. -2 Chinese inkberry. 50. Ochrosia elliptica (2).--..--- Ochrosia. 14. Chrysophyllum cainito (1)-.-| Star apple. 51. Opuntia vulgaris (2).......-| Prickly pear. 15. Chrysophyllum oliviforme | Damson plum. 52. Passiflora coerulea (3).-..--- Passion Vine. (1). 53. Persea gratissima (2)......- Avocado. 16. Chrysophyllum polynecium | 54. Phoenix dactylifera (3)....-- Date palm. (1). 55. Psidiwm cattleyanum (1)..-| Strawberry guava. 17. Citrus japonica (1)......--- Chinese orange. 56. Psidium guayava (1)...-..- Sweet red and 18. Citrus japonica (1).-......-- Kumquat. white lemon gua- 19. Citrus nobilis (1).......---- Tangerine. vas. QO ROLTUS MOULLESICL) eee Mandarin. 57. Psidium guayava pomi- | Common guava. 21. Citrus medica limetta (1).-..| Lime. Jerum (1). 22. Citrus medica limonum (1) -.| Lemon. 58. Psidium guayava pyriferum | Waiawi. 23. Citrus decumana (1).....-- Grapefruit. (3). j 24. Citrus decumana (1)...--.- Shaddock. 59. Prunus persica (1)..-..----- | Peach. 25. Citrus aurantium (1).......| Orange. 60. Prunus persica var. necta- | Nectarine. 26. Citrus aurantium var. | Sour orange. rina (1). amara (1). 61. Prunus armeniaca (1)..---.- | Apricot. 27. Clausena wampi (3).....--.| Wampi. 62. -Prunissppacl) <6 2 Plum. 28. Coffea arabica (1).-.......- offee. 63. Punica granatum (3)... ---- | Pomegranate. 29. Coffea liberica (1)..-.-.-.-.-- Liberian coffee. GAS PaTus Sppa(h)= 22s s2 bo -|1,194 alt 998 45 321 14 286 45 162 817 143 316 5) 182 59 4 43 oo (J) = Sore te no Taas ow bo 0 iw) — — — Latin fe) —_ Se ee MS) NT OH BORE AWRROOM “ID Soo .co) J ooo ve} on ocoooooco oOo we OT oo ~I —~ Moron oS ho le9) oa ahwso, nowy © 00 GO STF CO i) io) w SO al GS Tea ea eco, Se Seo SeorSeSsSo Foo Sof SeSSCSCSCSCSCSCCS, woo ost — S COR WNTOTOr bo =) 1 The losses to coffee growers due to excessive fruit-fly attack have been discussed on p. 34. 2 Braces are used only when denoting the same lot of fruit. Ow Ae ONE aARoORPONON Te ee nt ee ee ey ae) Loe Pea a ae re en Me . 5 OTS oo ee -* - Se ee eee ee Oy ee MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 101 While it seems evident that the favored host fruits of C. capitata will always be well infested if present cultural conditions persist, it is hoped that the value of the parasites may be sufficiently enhanced to free from attack such fruits as the avocado pear, which at present is infested just at the stage at which it becomes fit for harvesting. The general effectiveness of parasite control will be increased with the discovery and introduction of a suitable egg parasite. ARTIFICIAL CONTROL. The only method employed at the present time in Hawaii satis- factorily to protect fruits from attack of the Mediterranean fruit fly is the covering of the fruits while they are still too green to be affected. The value of the use of cold storage as a method of rendering fruits already harvested free from danger as carriers of the pest has been demonstrated, but cold storage, of course, can have no bearing on the activities of the fruit fly in the orchard. No satisfactory substance has yet been discovered for trapping adult females, and the killing of adults of both sexes by poison sprays is not a feasible method of control in Hawaii under present cultural conditions any more than is the destruction of the immature stages by the burial, submergence, burning, or boiling of the infested host fruits. The exceptional con- ditions found in Hawaii make impracticable at the present time the application of any of these field methods of control, except that of covering the young fruit, notwithstanding the fact that the value of these control measures when they can be consistently, intelligently, and universally applied, has been demonstrated. | PROTECTIVE COVERINGS. The only certain method now known of protecting fruits from attack by the Mediterranean fruit fly is to cover them when still quite young with some type of covering through which the female will not deposit eggs. During 1898 Fuller reports that about 22,000 running yards of mosquito netting were imported into South Africa for use in covering trees to protect the fruit from fruit-fly attack. The cloth was sewed into bags sufficiently large to be slipped over the trees and tied about the trunk. This method has been employed by the writers in protecting ripening peaches. Care must be taken, in Hawaii at least, to place the bags over the trees when the fruits are very small or early infestations will have already occurred which, after the cover- ings have been placed, will produce generations of adults that will result in the infestation of the entire crop beneath the covering. Covering the entire tree is too expensive to be followed out on a _ large scale, and entirely impractical with large trees or in windy areas. Protecting fruits with individual coverings made of cloth or paper is more popular in Hawaii. Fruits inclosed in paper bags are well 102 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. and cheaply protected. Coverings of cheese-cloth are often matted against the fruit by rains, thus making it possible for the female fly to oviposit in the fruit. The practice of covering mangoes with paper bags will afford pr otection to certain scale insects and permit them to develop and ruin the fruit. Frequently all the fruits on a tree may pee seen inclosed in paper bags. While this method of covering each fruit gives protection from the fruit fly, it involves much labor and patience and its practicability owner. So severe is fruit-fly attack in Hawaii that this method, in some one of its many modified forms, is the only peuaae Re if fruits are to be brought to maturity aminfested? CLEAN CULTURE. Clean culture in its broadest sense includes not only the detection, collection, and destruction of all infested fruits but also the elimination can only be determined by the value placed upon the fruit by the — a of useless or unnecessary host trees or shrubs. In some one or all of its phases it has been recommended and practiced in every country where the fruit fly is a pest, and in each one of these countries the | lethargy displayed by a majority of the people, no matter how much they have regretted their losses, has rendered the clean cultural methods inefficient. The effectiveness of clean culture depends upon many factors, of which cooperation among property owners, honesty on the part of inspectors, climatic and host relationships, the to- pography of the country, and a thorough knowledge of host fruits on the part of the director are the most important. Clean culture in the Bermudas, where conditions are exceptionally favorable for stamping out the pest, was rendered less effective, up to 1914, be- cause there was lacking a thorough knowledge of the complete list of host fruits subject to infestation. The fruit fly has been stamped out at Blenheim, Napiers, and Davenport, New Zealand, and at Launceston, Tasmania, by the application of such clean. cultural methods as the destruction of the fruits and the treatment of the soil beneath the trees with kerosene immediately after the discovery of the pest. The only other recorded instance of success attained as a direct result of clean cultural methods is that of the orange growers of the Blackall Range, in Queensland, Australia. These growers held a council and voted to grub out every kind of fruit tree except the orange, which was their staple crop. As a result of this drastic remedy the fly had nothing in which to breed during nine months of the year in this section, and therefore ceased to be a pest. The clean-culture campaign instituted by the Hawaiian Board of Agriculture during the fall of 1911 and continued by the Federal Bureau of Entomology from October, 1912, until April, 1914, was unsuccessful from its inception, since it did not protect the fruit MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 103 from attack. The main factors contributing to failure were lack of adequate police powers, adverse host and climatic conditions, and the absence, at that time, of any commercially grown orchard crop worth protecting. The impracticability of control by the clean-culture method was recognized by Mr. C. L. Marlatt, who, as a Federal rep- resentative immediately in charge of the Hawaiian investigations, was in personal touch with the problem during September, 1912. It was felt, however, that inadequate as this method had proved itself after a nine months’ trial from the standpoimt of alleviating the Hawaiian situation, it seemed still to offer the best-known way of safeeuarding the interests of mainland fruit growers. Therefore, for the purpose of lessening the opportunities-of spread to the coast, the destruction of fruits which could be carried on board ships was con- tinued. It was not until after representatives of California,! Hawaii, and the Federal bureau had reached the conclusion that no benefit was accruing either to the local or to the mainland interests that the campaign was discontinued. It is doubtful if ever a clean-culture campaign against the Mediter- ranean fruit fly was organized so efficiently or on so large a scale as that organized by Mr. W. M. Giffard of the Hawaiian Board, to include the city of Honolulu. That this method should prove a failure under Hawaiian conditions is no reflection upon the ability of those in charge of the work. Inspectors were prohibited from gathering and destroy- ing fruits unless they could first ptove to the satisfaction of the prop- erty holder that each fruit was infested, and this restriction upon the activities of the inspectors naturally led to numerous difficulties, particularly with the poorer and uneducated classes who often ex- erted every effort to save their fruit. This restriction also prevented a systematic gathering of all host fruits within a given area, but necessitated many examinations for the removal, on ripening, of the fruits of each individual tree. As fruits ripen rapidly in the semi- tropics, it proved a physical impossibility to arrange visits by the inspectors frequently enough to prevent infested fruits from falling to the ground. The data of Tables IIT to V illustrate the immense number of host trees and shrubs available for infestation in Honolulu, and the ease with which the fruit fly, uncurbed by climatic conditions, may find fruit for oviposition during any day of the year. A glance at Plates IV, VI, XII, and XIX will convince one of the absurdity of endeay- oring to remove all the fruits from many of the huge host trees of the islands. The writers know of many winged kamani trees, beneath which infested nuts may be gathered each week of the year, so tall 1 Report of Investigation of the Fruit-fiy situation in the Territory of Hawaii, F. Maskew. Monthly Bul. Cal. St. Com. Hort., v. 3, 1914, p. 227-238. 2 W. M. Giffard, Letter of Transmittal to Bulletin No. 3, Haw. Bd. Agr. and For., 1914, p. 7. 104 BULLETIN 536, U. 8. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. and brittle that to remove the fruits before they ripen would be im- possible. To this example might be added many others in which the removal of ripening fruit would be equally impracticable. That the campaign was successful in eliminating the bulk of the fruit ripening in Honolulu during the greater part of the year is evi- denced by the inability of the Hawaiian Board to obtain any large amount for their experimental work with parasites during the period the campaign was in progress. Excepting May, June, and early July, it was not an impossibility to gather the bulk of fruits ripening in Honolulu, but during these three months tons of ripening mangoes, falling continuously, presented a situation that could not be success- fully combated. (See Pls. XII and XIII.) While tons of mangoes were carried daily to the incinerator or the city dumps, except from the standpoint of city sanitation nothing of value was accomplished. Notwithstanding the fact that the bulk of the ripening and infested fruits were collected and fruit-fly conditions were unquestionably im- proved from thestandpoint of the numerical abundance of adult flies, the important fact remains that the number of fruit flies that suc- ceeded in reaching maturity was sufficiently large to infest practi- cally every fruit ripening within the city. Kerosene traps placed throughout one of the cleanest sections of the city captured large numbers of flies as proved by recorded data on file both with the Hawaiian Board and this bureau. (See Table XXI, p. 76.) So far as the writers know, there is no way in which clean culture can be made effective in Hawaii under present conditions. There are no impelling incentives. The islands are thoroughly overrun with the fruit fly, and this applies quite as much to the guava scrubs in pastures (PI. IT), on lava flows, and in mountain valleys and ra- vines as within the city limits. By far the larger proportion of host trees and shrubs are grown more for protection from the semitropic heat and for their ornamental value than for their fruits (Pl. V1). Large numbers of the host fruits are not edible. The destruction of host vegetation is out of the question until it can be proved that some advantage worth while can be gained. To cut down all host trees of Honolulu at the present time would be to remove a large percentage of her prized vegetation without giving her citizens adequate com- pensation. ELIMINATION OF HOST TREES. It has been stated under a discussion of clean-culture methods that the elimination of host trees and shrubs in Hawaii is impracti- cable at the present time. Should the Mediterranean fruit fly ever become established in California or the Southern States, wherein there is no such wealth of host fruits and where climatic conditions would assist in control, the elimination of host trees other than the orchard cultures to be protected would play a most valuable part in control MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 105 measures. Dr. Trabut found that in Algeria the infestation of oranges greatly increased after the introduction of such crops as peaches and _ persimmons, since these fruits furnished food for the fly during the summer and early fall months, which for the fruit fly had been starva- tion months previous to the cultivation of these fruits. Aided by these introduced summer crops, the fruit fly was able greatly to increase, so that when the orange crop began to ripen during the _ fall and winter months, the pest could attack it with increased force. The elimination of a comparatively few host trees, numerically speak- ing, in Bermuda would mean the elimination of breeding places over considerable areas. The destruction of unnecessary and valueless host trees serves to restrict the breeding ground, as well as to destroy the sequence of ripening hosts so that many adult flies will die while attempting to bridge the ensuing starvation periods, during which no host fruits can be found for oviposition. SPRAYING. It has been demonstrated that the Mediterranean fruit fly must feed for about four days after emergence in the warmer months before the females are capable of ovipositing in fruits. This feed- ing period may be extended to 10 days during winter in littoral Hawaii. Although the interval between emergence and oviposition is short, it offers the best opportunity to kill this pest by means of poisoned baits or sprays. Mally, in South Africa, first appreciated the vulnerability of this point in the life cycle and developed and demonstrated the value of poison sprays as a factor in the control of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Berlese, in Italy, however, working quite as independently, carried out similar experiments to check the olive fly (Dacus oleae). Equal credit is due Mally and Berlese for the use of poison sprays in combating fruit flies. The results of the experimental work of Mally during 1904-5 and of Dewar during 1915 were not successful, although encouraging. The later work of Mally during 1908-9 proved conclusively the value of poison sprays under South African conditions. Mally states that “a severe outbreak of the pest in a commercial peach orchard was - brought to a sudden and practically complete halt, and the fruit maturing later was marked under the guarantee of freedom from maggots,” while the infestation among fruits on check trees increased until practically all fruits had become infested. These experiments lead Mally to state that Ceratitis capitata can be controlled most perfectly under orchard conditions by means of alight sprinkling of a poisoned sweet over the trees just before or during the ripening period of the fruit. In 1912 Lounsbury demonstrated the applica- bility of the poison spray under town conditions in South Africa during ‘most unfavorable weather conditions, and concluded that if spray- 106 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. ing is properly done this remedy is applicable under town conditions, even where the summer rainfall may be heavy. In Western Australia Newman carried on spraying experiments — during a 53-months period (December 5, 1913, to May 25, 1914) when the fruit fly was most destructive. From the orchard at Crawly Park, in which he experimented, little or no sound fruit, +, other than grapes, had been picked for several years. The extreme — dryness of the Western Australia summer, during which little or no — rain or dew falls, affords an especially opportune time for making the best use of poison sprays. Newman estimated the cost of spray- i ing an acre, where an application of one pint of spray was made — every 12 to 14 days, to be from $1.50 to $2 per fortnight, and stated — | that this sum was a mere bagatelle to the loss of fruit during a similar — period over a like area. His work convinced Newman that good — results will follow the consistent application of poison sprays, par- ticularly when supplemented by the proper destruction of infested — fruits. In the Hawaiian Islarfds there are no real orchards in which | spraying experiments can be conducted under commercial conditions. Severin states that while he captured in 10 kerosene traps, hung — among 400 trees, 10,239 flies during a 5-weeks period before starting — spraying work, in the following 5 weeks, during which these trees were sprayed about once a week, the same traps caught only 182 — flies, and of these 93 were caught during the first 6 days after the © first application of spray. Inasmuch as the orchard in question is — composed of small citrus trees interplanted with peach and con- — tains a few strawberry-guava, fig, Chinese-orange and rose-apple trees, and is surrounded on one side by wild guava scrub, it is unfor- tunate that no data were given on the time of the year the spraying was done or on the eonriion of the host es in and about so small an orchard. The conclusions of Weinland following his spraying experiments — conducted during 1912 in dooryards of Honolulu are misleading. He used the data from 7 traps as a basis for his favorable report; — had he used the data from 10 other traps in the same series of his — experiments which are on file with the Hawaiian Board of Agri- — culture and Forestry he could have shown that on the whole his | experiments were not successful, and that in several instances he caught more flies after spraying than before. The writers have demonstrated from an immense amount of data on the number of — flies caught in single traps throughout a given year that even when no spraying is done there may be a sufficient falling off in the num- bers of fruit flies captured to mislead one into thinking that the trees had been sprayed. a MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWATI, 107 The only test of poison sprays made by the writers was in an attempt to control the Mediterranean fruit fly under adverse town con- ditions such as have been described on page 11. The city block in Honolulu bounded by Punahou, Beretania, Wilder, and Makiki Streets was sprayed every 2 or 3 days from July 17 to August 28, 1913. The adjoining blocks to the southeast were held as a check and the number of flies captured in 145 traps in the sprayed area and in 147 traps in the check area constituted the basis for deter- mining the benefits of the poison spray. Knapsack sprayers only were used, and while all trees and shrubs received spray, none were sprayed more than 9 feet above ground. The average number of flies caught daily each week is recorded in Table XXIX. TABLE XXIX.—Number of Mediterranean fruat flies caught in 145 and 147 traps hung an sprayed and unsprayed areas, respectively; spraying begun July 17, ended Aug. 28, 1913. = Average number of Average number of flies caught each day flies caught each day during week ending. during week ending. Date. Date. Sprayed | Unsprayed Sprayed | Unsprayed area. area. | area. area. Be BS 2 oe ES ig geet tn 1,191 UEDSPF NW AOS ORF OSs Fe ae es A ae 215.8 561.8 Diliyal Dee aes eo oe seme 881.4 (PPE WW INURE A oes eaaeeuseeesaee 111.1 439 Sumliy; HO Co. Soa ie 936 169.4 | SeptiGassass 2 he 222 ou 102.7 315.5 uliyZ26 sane eee eee 541.2 (OUI oA SE) Dipl Boseaeeeesoe ss oaekee (a2, 219.1 INDO Ss Seer Re Be be 472.5 904F SEIES@ Dt 20s2: 2 tas eects 76.5 151.8 PAW Obey Biss oie ops ise etn 383. 8 937 Sept27cpe eae. oa. Gaeee 90 141.2 YNWDVES QMO} HOSA Bs tak ie ie A 269. 4 762.8 The data show that. the number of flies caught in the sprayed area was greatly reduced by the spraying. ‘The reduction in flies was not ereat enough, however, to save fruit of any host ripening from becom- ing badly infested. Similar experiments conducted during May and June, 1914, in an attempt to protect peaches ripening in town door- yards were failures. Of several thousand fruits only three reached maturity uninfested. The composition of the poisoned-bait spray used against the Mediter- ranean fruit fly consists of some poison, a sweet substance attractive to the adults, and water. Mally in 1909 used the following formula: Sugar, 3 pounds; arsenate of lead, 4 ounces; water, 5 gallons. He found that from 1 to 14 pints were sufficient for the average 10-year- old peach or nectarine tree. Lounsbury in his town demonstration work used a spray consisting of 6 pounds brown sugar, 6 ounces arsenate of lead paste, and 8 gallons water. Weinland used a spray of 34 pounds lead arsenate paste, 10 pounds brown sugar, 5 gallons plantation molasses, and 50 gallons water. Severin used the Mally formula, but increased the lead arsenate from 3 to 5 ounces. The writers used the formula of Weinland. 108 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. The writers believe that poisoned-bait sprays if carefully applied under such commercial conditions as exist in California and Florida would prove successful. Their observations indicate that honeybees are in no way affected by these sprays. It is doubtful, however, if poisoned-bait sprays will ever be practical under present-day cultural conditions in Hawaii, where no fruit crop is grown commercially, where the majority of host fruits are either inedible or not worth the cost of spraying, and where sources of reinfestation from without are sogreat. The entire subject of control byspraying with poisoned baits is still open for investigation under varying conditions. COLD STORAGE. A discussion of the use to which cold-storage temperatures may be put as an aid in offsetting the disastrous results of attack by the Med- iterranean fruit fly was published by the writers? in 1916. The experimental work was undertaken primarily with the hope that it would be an aid in solving the discouraging problems of local horti- culturists. But whatever its value in this direction, it now appears that the results may be of much greater commercial importance in defining the conditions under which cold-storage temperatures will kill the fruit fly in stored fruits, thus rendering them free from danger as transporters of this pest from one country to another, or even from one infested district to another. It seems reasonable to conclude that sooner or later the certification of properly refrigerated fruit will be practicable. When an association of fruit growers or a community awakens to a realization of the financial value of the cold-storage treatment there is reason to believe it will result in the operation of central refrigeration plants under the supervision of officials whose guarantee will insure that all fruits sent out from the plant are abso- lutely free from danger as carriers of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Experimental work in Australia, as an example, has shown that such perishable fruits as peaches and Japanese plums can be placed on the European markets in good condition if sent in cold storage, and such exports have been encouraged under Government guarantees. While cold storage can never lessen the damage already done by larve within fruits offered for sale or shipment, and in no way deals with the root of the trouble, as a palliative, guarding fruits against further attack while in storage or transit, it may become of imesti- mable value. Fruits, such as apples, that contain freshly-laid eggs or very young larve may be placed upon the market, provided further fruit-fly development is checked by cold storage. For the details of the effect of cold-storage temperatures upon the eggs, larve, and pupe of the Mediterranean fruit fly, as well as for 1 Back, E. A., ang Pemberton, C. E., Effect of cold-storage temperatures upon the Mediterranean fruit fly. Jour. Agr. Research, v. 5, no. 15, 1916, p. 657-666; Back, E. A., and Pemberton, C. E., Effect _ of cold-storage temperatures upon the pupe of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Jour. Agr. Research, v. 6, no. 7, 1916, p. 251-260. \ a a we a OO a MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. 109 historical facts dealing with the use of such temperatures, one should consult the two articles to which reference has been made. Fruits of almost any variety commonly placed in cold storage are held at temperatures varying from 32° to 45° F., with preference shown to a range of 32° to 36° F. By way of general summary of many experi- ments, including observations upon over 26,000 eggs, 60,000 larve, and 173,000 pupe to determine the effect of such temperatures as 32°, 32° to 33°, 33° to 34°, 34° to 36°, 36°, 36° to 40°, 38° to 40°, and 40° to 45°, it may be said that no stage of the Mediterranean fruit fly can survive refrigeration for seven weeks at 40° to 45° F.; for three weeks at 33° to 40° F., or for two weeks at 32° to 33° F. EFFECT OF FREEZING TEMPERATURES UPON THE EGG, LARVA, AND PUPA. The only freezing temperatures available in Hawat for experi- mental work with eggs, larve, and pupe were those found in cold- storage plants maintaining rooms for the refrigeration of fish and meat. The temperature of these rooms ranged between 21° and 30° F. though averaging close to 26° F. Out-of-door freezing tempera- tures have been experienced by the writers on the Island of Hawaii at an elevation of over 8,000 feet, but lasted only for a few hours at a time and occurred on mountain slopes not easily accessible. THE EGG. Apples in which fruit-fly eggs had been deposited on November 3, 1914, were placed in cold storage at a temperature varying from 24° to 30° F. Fruit was re- moved daily for 10 consecutive days and observations made on a total of 5,434 eggs contained within them. No eggs survived more than 7 days of refrigeration at this temperature. Of 507 eggs subjected to 25° F. for one day 414 hatched on removal to normal temperature; 275 of 308 eggs subjected to 24° to 25° F. for 2 days hatched after removal; 588 of 741 eggs hatched on removal aiter refrigeration for 3 days at 24° to 26° F.; 430 of 748, 65 of 384, 7 of 534, and 1 of 255 eggs hatched on removal after refrigeration at 24° to 30° F. for 4, 5, 6, and 7 days, respectively. Allof 606, 624, and 727 eggs removed to normal temperature aiter 8, 9, and 9 days of similar refrigeration were dead. In a second experiment carried out during July, 1913, peaches containing eggs were picked promiscuously in the field, and placed in storage at 26° to 30° F. The results were similar to those mentioned above, as 42 of 178, 7 of 10, and 20 of 145 eggs hatched on removal, after refrigeration for 1, 2, and 6 days, respectively; 57, 148, 82, 134, and 14 eggs refrigerated for 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12 days were dead on removal from storage. THE LARVA. First-instar larve.—A total of 2,116 first-instar larvee were placed in cold storage at 21° to 28° F. None survived more than 5 days of refrigeration, and the following observations were recorded: 62 of 248 larvee in refrigeration for 5 days were found living on examination after removal to normal temperature; 297 of 340 survived one day of refrigeration at 22° to 23° F.; 239 of 275 survived two days of refrigeration at 21° to 23° F.: 110 of 243, and 44 of 240 survived refrigeration at 21° to 28° F. for 3 and 4 days, respectively; 264, 132,213, and 141 larve refrigerated for 6, 7,8, and 9 days, respectively, were dead on removal from storage. 110 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. In a second room, the temperature of which ranged from 26° to 30° F., infested peaches were placed. An examination of the contained larve after refrigeration gave results similar to those above; 21, 9, 9, and 19 larvee were found dead after 5, 6, 9, and 12 days of refrigeration, and 336 removed after refrigeration from 13 to 15 days were dead. Second-instar larve.—A total of 3,216 second-instar larvee were subjected to freezing temperatures with the following results: 367 of 377, 77 of 123, and 9 of 195 larvee were found living on removal to normal temperatures after refrigeration for 1, 2,and 3 days, respectively, at 21° to 29° F. An average of 361 larvee removed after refrigeration 4,5,6,7,8,9,and 10 days weredead. No living larve were found after the third day of refrigeration. Third-instar larve.—Of a total of 6,774 third-instar larve in kamani nuts (Termi- nalia catappa) subjected to freezing temperatures ranging between 22° and 27° F. for 1 to 9 days, 82 of 157 and 4 of 510 larvee were found alive upon removal aiter refrigera- tion at 24° to 27° F. for 1 and 3 days, respectively. Only 3 of 524 were alive on removal after 4 days of refrigeration at 22° to 27° F. An average of 1,221 larve removed daily between the fifth and ninth days of refrigeration were dead. After refrigeration at 26° to 30° F. 114, 7, 1, 12, and 124 larvee in peaches were found dead on removal after 5, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days, respectively, of refrigeration. Ten badly infested peaches were removed to the laboratory after 3 days of refrigera- tion and from two of these there later emerged 1 and 9 full-grown larve which pupated normally and produced adults. No adults were reared from 15 peaches removed aiter 14 days of refrigeration. Fourteen peaches held in refrigeration 5 days at 26° to 30° F., then successively for 24 hours each at 33° to 38° F. and 40° to 45° F., were removed to the laboratory. A total of 36 third-instar larve, found within the fruit, were dead. THE PUPA. A total of 21,450 pupz have been subjected to freezing temperatures varying irom 24° to 32° F. and averaging about 26° F. All pupz were fatally injured before the end of the fourth day of such refrigeration. Three hundred 3-day-old pupz, 100 2-day-old pup, and 200 i-day-old pupz on removal to normal temperature aiter 32 days of refrigeration at about 26° F. produced 1, 1, and 1 adults, respectively. Under similar conditions only 2 of 100 4-day-old pupz and 3 of 200 3-day-old pupz produced adults after 3 days of refrigeration. Each lot of pup ranging from 1 to 9 days old and totaling 1,900 individuals yielded from 2 to 22, or a total of 78 adults, after 2 days of refrigeration. Even 1 day of refrigeration at 26° F. proved fatal toa large percentage of pupx, especially the younger, as evidenced by data in Table XXX covering observations on 1,500 pupe. TABLE XXX.—L ffect of 26° F. upon pupal life. Pupex placed in cold storage Oct. 27, 1914; removed to normal temperature Oct. 28. Number of adults emerging on— "| Oct.30. Oct. a1, Nov. 1.| Nov. 2. | Nov.3.| Nov. s| Nov. Nov. 6.| Nov. 7.| Nov. 8. mb WH Oro 5700 © i) So Oo MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. a8 During May, 1913, 500, 119, and 331 pupe of all ages were placed in cold storage, the temperature varying from 22° to 24° F. for 5, 7, and 12 days, respectively. After removal to normal temperature all pupze were found to be dead. During July, 1913, 2,000 pup of various ages were subjected to a temperature varying from 24° to 30° F. and averaging about 26° F. for 3 to 16 days; none yielded adults after removal from storage even after only 3 days of refrigeration. On June 24, 1913, 2,500 pupz ~ removed from storage after one month of refrigeration at about 26° F. were found dead. Pupe held in refrigeration 4 days at 24° to 30° F. were removed to normal tempera- ture after being held 2 successive days at 33° to 38° F. and 40° to 45° F., respectively, but none yielded adults. TRAPS. _ The idea of exposing in infested areas a substance that will attract - both sexes of the Mediterranean fruit fly is an excellent one, and may lead to the discovery of some medium which will prove an effective method of control. It was the writers’ idea to simulate, in such a substance, the odor emanating from the male C. capitata, but the experiments proved unsuccessful. Severin exposed various oils de- rived from crude petroleum, but found them ineffective. He also used, without satisfactory results, turpentine, coconut oil, citronella, whale and fish oils, vinegar, and vanilla. Hooper in Western Austra- ha experimented with naphtha and turpentine in 1907 without suc- cess, and similar results followed the exposure by Gurney in New South Wales of citronella, linseed, salad, whale, neatsfoot, and fish- oils. Howlett, in India, was able to attract males of Dacus zonatus and D. dwversus by exposing citronella oil. Later he believed that _he had found the actual substances which are responsible for the attraction of these two species in isoeugenol and methyleugenol. Three traps containing, in the order mentioned, eugenol, methyl- eugenol, and isoeugenol hung in orange trees in a badly infested area of Honolulu captured in 6 days only 2,10, and 1 male C. capitata, as compared with 77, 153, and 48 males captured in check traps con- taining kerosene hung within 50 feet of them. These three substances were furnished the writers by Severin, who had received them in turn from Howlett. Much of the experimental work to which reference has just been _ made represents but a small amount of that undertaken to determine the effectiveness of traps. It has grown out of the accidental dis- covery in Australia by a housewife that a coating of kerosene oil, put _ about a post for the protection of a glass of preserves from ants, _was attractive to adult C. capitata. This observation led to the heralding, in 1907, of the use of kerosene as a method of control as the ‘‘best discovery against the fruit fly in years,’ and to regulations ‘in Western Australia requiring fruit growers to place from one to __two traps in each fruit tree. It is natural that, entomologists com- -bating this pest should carry on experiments, but the worthlessness of kerosene as a factor of control was not demonstrated until a considerable literature upon the subject had been published. - Kerosene is ineffective, inasmuch as it attracts for the most part only 112 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. males. Of 2,639 adults, representing four lots examined by the writers, only eight were females. Only 36 of 10,239 adults captured by Severin were females. Many thousands of adults captured in kerosene oil in connection with the present investigations have demonstrated the worthlessness of kerosene as a factor in reducing the infestation of fruit. While the use of kerosene to trap the adults of the Mediterranean fruit fly is of no value in checking the ravages of this pest, the writers have made use of the number of males captured in traps to arrive at conclusions regarding the relative abundance of adults in any given area. The use of the kerosene trap for this purpose when sup- plemented by other observations has a value, provided conclusions are not attempted from too small a number of catches. The writers have data on file covering the number of flies caught in 292 traps for 16 consecutive months. As a rule traps hung in dense foliage of any sort captured more flies, while traps hung on porches and set upon stumps or in other exposed situations from 30 to 80 feet away from foliage captured only an occasional male. It would seem that in countries where host trees and shrubs are less abundant than in Hawaii the number of flies caught could be used as a basis for valuable deductions on such subjects as seasonal abundance and migrations of adults. Description of trap.—The trap used by the writers is a simple affair consisting of an ordinary pie tin suspended by three tin strips from a tin cone through the top of which extends a wire by which the entire trap may be suspended from a branch. A trap can be made cheaply by any tinsmith. If properly painted, traps will last several seasons. The pan may be removed as often as desired. In Honolulu the oil was replenished every 2 or 3 days. In dry areas no protective covering for the pan containing the oil is needed. Oil to cover the bottom of the container to a depth of one-fourth of an inch is sufficient. The trap should be so long that no oil will spread to the bark of the tree. SUBMERGENCE IN WATER. Submergence of host fruits as a method of control has been recom- mended many times by writers and investigators of fruit flies. Harris recommended weighting sacks of infested fruit and sinking them at sea. Gurney found that larve in sea water in test tubes pupated at the surface against the glass and that a large percentage of larvee in oranges submerged in cold water for 6, 8, 24, and 45 hours survived, pupated, and matured into normally healthy adults, and concluded that no casual treatment such as throwing infested fruit into a stream can be considered an effective method of destroying fruit-fly larve. Severin showed that many well-grown larve found floating on the top of a barrel of water, into which infested oranges had been thrown 24 hours previous, resumed activity within several hours after being placed on moist filter paper, in spite of the fact MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII. gates that they were distended and apparently dead when removed from the water. A small percentage of other larve taken from the water after 3 days showed traces of life, but no adults developed from the fruit submerged for 4 days. With the temperature ranging between 67° and 80° F. the writers were able to demonstrate that well-grown larve placed in tightly stoppered vials of fresh water died by the end of the third day. Thus 486 of 490 larve survived submergence 21 hours, 96 of 100 for 24 hours, and 78 of 100 for 48 hours; two lots of 100 larve each sub- . merged 70 and 74 hours, respectively, were dead. It was found, however, that larve live longer when placed in water in open vials. Under such conditions certain individuals may remain suspended from the surface film of water much as do mosquito larve and pupe. This is made possible by the circlet of small hairs about the posterior stigmal plates. While larve ordinarily become rigid and apparently dead within 2 or 3 hours after submergence in ,water, larve thus suspended were found to remain active for as long as 7 days in one instance. One larva removed to fresh fruit after sus- pension for 5 days pupated 7 days later and emerged as an adult after 9 days in the pupa stage. TaBLE XXXI.—E fect of submergence of host fruits in water upon the larve of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Dead larve. ! | A Living larve. Number Nurabep hours im- Host fruit. Coe mersed. fred 5 First Second Third First Second Third me Beh instar. instar. instar. instar. instar. instar. 23 e 4 ‘ MY 64 . it 18 41 2 10: 0 0 7 |fApple.-------------- 6 0 91 32 0 0 0 94 | 8 0 262 107 0 0 0 4 21 0 0 0 0 63 279 22 22 0 0 5 0 113 448 49 23 0 0 88 0 0 ol 72 |}Winged kamani.-... 33 0 0 179 0 0 12 96 253 0 0 1,376 0 0 1 98 | | 21 0 0 142 0 0 0 120 |; 3 0 0 147 0 0 0 i 4 4 36 80 0 0 0 0 24 5 0 9 0 0 8 17 70 |-Rose apple.......... 50 0 0 AT al cate Fee Mr yr ee ten | se OR AS 7. 1 0) 12 0 0 0 0 98 3 0 37 0 0 0 0 i 18 94 0) 123 USO a| soe ee aL 72 97 ge 39 0 “1 163 J 022s.) ee sees 3 79 |{Chinese orange... fee Pe) Oph...) 2 BON Hl oes 94 SOR Seek we serie 57 OS ie eee MA ee en ee ee ae 116 SS Pal Ton eee pee | ey TM So ea pay Ay Veh ate Cahier: tel Ral seamen ) dae EE nk 18 Gas eee ATi 63 OF ee eee 51 168 46 = Ca ue te ea) Pa ee eta Cet haa en ee es BE | Pe pane NS 3 ere a alee 19 65 R 2 TO ME Ree ee 94 | Teall ese ee arena | et Mn ed cl a) | Viper es Gee Al ea Pte | serge SC 49°] =r ANG a | BF a ra 11 72 |eStrawberry guava... BAN es et Co 17 i fel |S eae ata ea SPER es YE oe 96 LOPE ese Paes, Soe ee Soules nora i Un | Seas aA 4 | NE SElENG? = rie aye CN 5 AST NAY TPA AE tots clea an Fen] Capen Be 40 36 7 Delors st 9 fe | EERE SA Re Sie SECIS OOK. 96 | PEO PATIO OBE is MUN li) | li a 14 Bion haicttesey aot oh| Mere tales Cen Den Meera 121 | Sete ee br 9 Pes SSS Sa ee eae Bens aoe W SS : 66 |\ Bek Shs Te Si Ee a A die ed Ne as yl a a st 91 \Peach wes eseceeee eee i AMM Ceam ale aa sw Naga oy me ame RE airy el AO 81340°—18—Bull. 536——8 1li4 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. The examination of various host fruits submerged in ordinary tap water, when the temperature ranged between 67° and 80° F., gave the data recorded in Table XXXI. The data indicate that while larve are little affected after 1 or 2 days of submergence, a large percentage are dead after submergence for 3 days. Seventeen second- instar larve and 1 third-instar, however, were found living after submergence for 4 days. It is safe to conclude that submergence for 5 days will either kill all larve or incapacitate them for further development. It might be added that fruits held in water for as long as 3 to 5 days are, in Hawaii, rendered unfit as food for fruit-fly larve after removal from water. | TaBLeE XXXII.—E fect of submergence in tap water upon pupx of the Mediterranean Sruit fly. Number | Number Date of Number of | Number of Lot ofpupe | ofdays Date of anniCe Date of adult jadult Opius| Date of number. | under ob- im- pupation. removal. |C.capitata| humilis | emergence. servation. | mersed. ae emerging. | emerging. 650 3 | June 27-28 191 15 | June 29. PSre 390 1,016 2 | June 14-17 | June 24 | June 26 4 18 | June 30. SESCAE ANU. A RE Ee SSUES me oA ID ote oP ae fi ee Pe 16 | July 4. BP? el 1 | July 5. 62 0 | July 1. 7 a Phage eo | 440 Be ae do da.s 2 June 27 16 3 | July 2. 1 17] duly 3: | 4 0 | July i. So Re aoe 312 1 | Ae do.. ER GOxtHa: June 28 3 0 | July 2. 0 1] Jaly:4: Ae aad TEL Ee 410 i es ae: do.. adonsic: June 29 0 0 Habs ee 258 Oh eee do. EGOweee June 30 1 0 | July 7. Gr 214 ‘ial eases Gees dor July 1 0 0 32 0 | June 29, 207 5 | June 30. 190 7 | Julyl (foe, Ber 950 2| June 17-22 |...do..... June 26 156 18 | July3 39 8 | July 4 6 0 | July5 18 2 | July 6 64 0 | July i Ais eee eae he July 3 Sees. 460 3 |...--d0..22-.|...do.2..-| Tune 27 inl ee eee ete 9 1 | July6 Bl eee el See July 9 1 eters ee July 1 253a|L eee eee July 3 23 3 | July 4 OR aes 210 a Goss |-eaOOseeee June 28 9 2 | July 5 es ick 5 eee July 6 19 1! July7 1 1 | July8 IX) Mes OE EE Bo July 3 LOS eee aero July 4 1! a ee ee July 5 (eee eoeaee 557 5H bashes doll ess. donee June 29 42 josie uses July 6 1S) Joes. Soke July 7 Dd: | eee ae ae July 8 Gp) betes 2 Sener oe. 2 July 9 US | Deer eeeeeie se July 7 [iy alc 372 oye dol ge dor." June 30 Naina “ae ae ee | SI. See July 12. i: Sees | 476 Cs ee do down. July 1 0 | Total....| 5, 675 | Pupe from 1 to 4 days old were submerged in vials of tap water when the temperature ranged from 72° to 85° F. A record of the MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAII, TES emergence from these pupe is given in Table XXXII. The data covering lots 1 to 6 show that the more mature pupx succumbed to — immersion more quickly than the younger pup of lots 7 to 12. Thus many of the young pup emerged as adults after being submerged 4, 5, and 6 days, while submergence for these periods killed nearly all the older pup. Submergence for at least 7 days is necessary to assure the death of all pupe. BURIAL IN SOIL. Many entomologists have made statements regarding the efficacy of burying infested fruits in the soil as a method of destroying fruit flies. These references have been summarized by Severin, hence need not be considered at length here, particularly as they deal with a method that is decidedly unsatisfactory and seldom effective. Gurney found that pupe buried 6, 8, and 12 inches below the surface of the soil produced adults that were able to escape. Severin found that adults could make their way to the surface from pupz buried 2,3, and 4 feet beneath dry sand, and from pupz buried 2 feet beneath wet sand, but that no adults escaped through 2, 3, or 4 feet of dry soul. Mally found that 10 inches of soil shoveled loosely over fruits did not prevent adults from escaping later, but that no adults could reach the surface through 10 inches of well-tamped soil. No adults escaped from 20 pupz placed in the center of a cake of mud one-half inch square taken from the heavy, tenacious soil of the vegetable gardens at Waikiki. The mud became thoroughly dry without cracks before the end of the normal pupa stage. A cake of the same soil 14 inches square, however, on drying developed a crack through which 50 adults made their escape from 75 pupe buried within the center of the square. While adults can not make their way through a foot of well-tamped soil, it is difficult to bury host fruits in such a manner that the soil covering will remain firm. The rapid decay and settling of fruit, if any amount be buried in the same excavation, cause cracks to develop through which adults can escape readily. While many fruit flies can be killed by proper burial, indifference and carelessness among workmen will always make possible the escape of many adults. BURNING AND BOILING HOST FRUITS. Burning or boiling host fruits is a sure method of destroying the immature stages of the Mediterranean fruit fly provided the work is feasible and can be done thoroughly. The usual practice of throw- ing fallen infested fruits into a compost pit and burning over them every few days such trash as may have accumulated is not a trust- worthy method of destruction, inasmuch as the heat produced is very often insufficient to cook or burn the fruit thoroughly or to reach the pup in the soil beneath the fruit. 116 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. SUMMARY. The Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) was discovered at Honolulu in the Hawaiian Islands in 1910. Since that time it has spread to all the islands of the Hawaiian group, and because of the equable climate and abundance of host fruits, has effected a serious and permanent check to horticultural pursuits, and put an end to all export trade in fruits except that in bananas and pineapples. Research seems to have fixed the native home of C. capitata in tropical Africa. Its spread has been slow but persistent throughout tropical and semitropical countries, until at the present time it is known to have become a pest in every continental area except that of North America. With the Mediterranean frmt fly now well established in Bermuda and the Hawaiian Islands, it would seem that it is only a matter of time before it will be inadvertently introduced and become established in California and the Southern States. The frequent interception and destruction of infested fruits from Hawaii at California ports, by officers of the Federal Horticultural Board, indicates the ease with which the mtroduction of the Mediterranean fruit fly might occur were Hawaian fruit permitted unrestricted entry to the mainland of the United States. No edible fruit in Hawaii, except the pmeapple, escapes attack. The banana, when in good condition, is never infested, infestation having been noted only when the fruits were overripe or injured. The Mediterranean fruit fly has been reared in Honolulu from 72 species of host fruits, including the peach, plum, pear, guava, mango, orange, lemon, grapefruit, banana, etc. A large proportion of the host fruits are inedible. Throughout the littoral regions a continu- ous cycle of host fruits is available for infestation throughout the year; hence there are no starvation periods for the fly to survive. With such a quantity and variety of host fruits, nuts, and vege- tables in which to propagate, and enjoyimg an ideal climate, the mean temperatures of which vary between 68° and 79° F. for the regions in which the fly is a most serious pest, the Mediterranean fruit fly finds no check to its rapid increase. While a single genera- tion may require as few as 17 days during the warmest weather, there are usually 15 to 16 generations a year at Honolulu, and 10 to 12 generations in areas where the winter mean drops to 68° F. There is considerable variation in the length of the immature stages, par- ticularly during the coolest weather. Inasmuch as adults have been kept alive for 10 months and may deposit eggs in lots of a few to 32 daily quite regularly throughout life, the generations become hope- lessly confused. While adults are not forced in Hawaii to pass through periods of several months when food is not available for oviposition, females deprived of host fruits for such periods will resume active and normal oviposition when the fruits become avail- MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY IN HAWAIL 117 able. One female deposited 622 eggs between June 4 and September 2. The long adult life, and the ability of the female to deposit eggs regularly succeeding the period of from 4 to 8 days after emergence which is required to complete sexual maturity, make it possible for the annual progeny of a single pair of adults to reach enormous numbers. Attempts at control by clean culture have been failures, owing largely to msurmountable obstacles placed in the way of man by a favorable climate and an unprecedented quantity of varied host fruits. Many fruits and nuts subject to attack grow on huge trees which blossom irregularly, and produce, in many instances, fruit susceptible to attack throughout the year. There is no procedure by which clean culture may be made effective under the present Hawaiian cultural methods. The islands are thoroughly overrun with the fruit fly, and this applies quite as much to the wild guava scrub in pastures, on lava flows, and in mountain valleys and ravines, as it does within the city limits. By far the larger number of host trees and shrubs aie grown more for the protection they offer from the semitropical sun and for their ornamental value than for their inedible fruits. The destruction of host vegetation will not be practicable until it can be demonstrated that a distinct advantage would be gained thereby. To destroy all host trees of Honolulu at the present time would be to remove a large percentage of her prized vegetation without any compensating returns. The ideal chmatic and host conditions of Hawau have rendered less effective and impracticable the usual artificial methods of con- trol the value of which has been demonstrated in other countries pos- sessing natural features less favorable to fruit-fly increase. At the present time the only hope of relief lies in the establishment of para- sites. Six parasites have been introduced during the past three years and are now well established. While they have more than repaid the Territory of Hawaii for the cost of their introduction by bringing about an improved condition in the coffee-growing industry, it is doubtful whether they will effect a sufficient decrease in the proportion of infested host fruits to be considered efficient factors in control. This conclusion appears inevitable in spite of the remark- able success attendant on their introduction, unless a campaign is inaugurated for a reapportionment of host fruits; otherwise the hordes of adult flies maturing in thick-meated fruits, or in fruits protecting larve by other means from attack by parasites, will neutralize the effective work of parasites attacking larve in thin-skinned and thin- pulped fruits. There is great need of an effective egg parasite that will kill the fruit fly before the larva can do injury. From a practical or commercial standpoint the results of the inves- tigations reported herewith are of value (1) in furnishing data to 118 BULLETIN 536, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. determine the probable range of this pest should it be introduced and gain a foothold in continental United States; (2) in verifying the practicability of poison sprays; (3) in indicating the utilization of cold-storage temperatures in making safe the movement of fruits from areas which might otherwise be cut off by quarantines from outside markets; and (4) in placing upon a sound basis the banana and pineapple export trade of the Hawanan Islands. At 50° F. little if any development takes place, and freezing tem- peratures can be withstood successfully only for short periods. Ac- cumulated data indicate that the Mediterranean fruit fly will not become a serious pest in climates where the mean temperature is below 50° F. during periods covering three months of the year. While Hawaiian conditions are unfavorable to the use of poison sprays, the work of the writers has convinced them that these sprays can be employed as successfully in combating this pest in commercial orchards of California and of Southern States, should they ever become infested, as in Africa and Australia. While at present cold storage is not utilized to modify existing quarantine, it is a recognized fact that, commercially used, it has been of value in safeguarding fruits from additional infestation while en route over long distances. The data set forth herewith indicate for the first time the duration of time required for various tempera- ture ranges to kill the stages of the fruit fly within stored fruits, and from these records it is reasonable to conclude that the certification of properly refrigerated fruit is practicable. When an association of fruit growers or the people discover that refrigeration is financially worth while, there is reason to believe that it will result in the opera- tion of central refrigeration plants under the supervision of officers whose guarantee will insure that all fruits sent out from the plant are absolutely free from danger as carriers of the Mediterranean fruit fly. PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL- TURE RELATING TO INSECTS INJURIOUS TO CITRUS AND OTHER SUBTROPICAL FRUITS. AVAILABLE FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION BY THE DEPARTMENT. Scale Insects and Mites on Citrus Trees. (Farmers’ Bulletin 172.) Control of the Citrus Thrips in California and Arizona. (Farmers’ Bulletin 674.) Carbon Disulphid as an Insecticide. (Farmers’ Bulletin 799.) Citrus Mealybug and its Control in California. (Farmers’ Bulletin 862.) Citrus Fruit Insects in Mediterranean Countries. (Department Bulletin 134.) The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Bermuda. (Department Bulletin 161.) Katydids Injurious to Oranges in California. (Department Bulletin 256.) Argentine Ant: Distribution and Control in the United States. (Department Bulletin 377.) Fumigation of Ornamental Greenhouse Plants with Hydrocyanic-acid Gas. (Depart- ment Bulletin 513.) Spraying for White Flies in Florida. (Entomology Circular 168.) FOR SALE BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON, D. C. The Melon Fly in Hawaii. (Department Bulletin 491.) Price, 25 cents. Preparations for Winter Fumigation for Citrus White Fly. (Entomology Circular 111.) Price, 5 cents. Mango Weevil. (Entomology Circular 141.) Price, 5 cents. Mediterranean Fruit Fly. (Entomology Circular 160.) Price, 5 cents. Fumigation for Citrus White Fly, as Adapted to Florida Conditions. (Entomology Bulletin 76.) Price, 15 cents. Fumigation Investigations in California. (Entomology Bulletin 79.) Price, 15 cents. Hydrocyanic-acid Gas Fumigation in California. (Entomology Bulletin 90, 3 pts.) Price, 20 cents. Fumigation of Citrus Trees. (Entomology Bulletin 90, pt. I.) Price, 20 cents. Value of Sodium Cyanid for Fumigation Purposes. (Entomology Bulletin 90, pt IT.) Price, 5 cents. Chemistry of Fumigation with Hydrocyanic-acid Gas. (Entomology Bulletin 90, pt. III.) Price, 5 cents. White Flies Injurious to Citrus in Florida. (Entomology Bulletin 92.) Price, 25 cents. ; Orange Thrips, Report of Progress. (Entomology Bulletin 99, pt. I.) Price, 5 cents. Red-banded Thrips. (Entomology Bulletin 99, pt. II.) Price, 5 cents. Natural Control of White Flies in Florida. (Entomology Bulletin 102.) Price, 20 cents. Argentine Ant. (Entomology Bulletin 122.) Price, 25 cents. ia a . 3 X Crna i < r 7 (OL Pes CROLO NOVO Sia 5) rt oO Ke A , it i ; ee "ADDITIONAL Cont ee Ti Bu Nia YO) ie Ran see ele Let qo : Maiv) ee, Jha " vn Reh > aa ‘ —s OF THIS ‘PUBLICATION MAY # BE | PROCURED FROM ; ” THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS = sts at as ae COU TNS Sarat = eae ar Ne Ne oe Ps ‘ wah PES eS, i hs " HEE VII OROF Eh py os G8 ae iT AT ‘ n See ts eh ea CENTS PER COPY B ‘ “+ f ‘si , Melee tL: art LA ay ee ae ee eee ees