\ 955 MussouRI JBOTANICAL GARDEN |JBULLETIN VOLUME XLII 19355 ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI PUBLISHED MONTHLY EXCEPT JULY AND AUGUST, BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES SUBSCRIPTION PRICE: $2.50 A YEAR MissouR! BOTANICAL GARDEN LIBRARY MISSOURI BO" ANICAL GARDEN BU sALETIN CONTENTS A Series of Ozark Bulletins The Ozarks—Their Past, Present, and Future The Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden western Volume XLIII January, 1955 Book Reviews: Benson and Darrow’s “Trees and Shrubs of the South- Deserts” ; “Manual of the Plants of Colorado” ; Christopher’s “Pruning Manual” Harrington’s Number 1 Cover: Lower outlet Greer Spring. Photograph by Julian A. Steyermark. Office of publication: 306 E. Simmons Street, Galesburg, Illinois. Editorial Office: Missouri Botanical Garden, 2315 Tower Grove Avenue, St. Louis, 10, Missouri Published monthly except July and August by the Board of Trustees of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Subscription price: $2.50 a year. Entered as second-class matter January 26, 1942, at the post-office at Gales- burg, Illinois, under the Act of March 3, 1879. Please: Do not discard a copy of the Bulletin. If you have no further use for yours pass it along toa friend or return it to the Garden. Return postage guaranteed. Missour1 Botanical Garden Bulletin Vol. XLII JANUARY, 1955 No. 1 A SERIES OF BULLETINS ABOUT THE OZARKS To a biologist the outstanding thing about St. Louis is that it is the front door to the Ozark plateau. Geographically, this area begins in the edge of metropolitan St. Louis and extends southwesterly almost to the very corner of the state. Most of the plateau is within Missouri, though its southern edge reaches down into Arkansas where it joins onto the Boston Mountains. In the last quarter-century St. Louisans have become increasingly in- terested in the Ozarks; the future of this area and the future of St. Louis are now seen to be intertwined and part of one general problem. The BULLETIN is therefore planning to devote from time to time a considerable portion of its pages to the past and future of the Ozarks. Articles by a number of different authors are scheduled, people of different backgrounds and with differing points of view. The opinions these writers express will be their own, uncensored in any way. They will certainly disagree about details, and some of them may even disagree about fundamentals. It will be a healthy thing if they do. Out of this clashing of opinion will come a wider scattering of facts about the Ozarks and a better understanding of the problems of that arean—EpGar ANDERSON. Fig. 1. A gravel bar at a bend of Jacks Fork. (1) 2 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN THE OZARKS—THEIR PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE JULIAN A. STEYERMARK! Before a bank loans money, an investigation is made of the borrower’s past and present background. Before prescribing curative treatments or perfcrming operations, the physician or surgeon inquires into the patient’s case history. Detailed study of the earth’s strata and structure precedes the discovery of new oil flows and gold or other valuable mineral deposits. In the same manner, it would be foolish to speculate on what may happen to the Ozarks without first inquiring into their past history. PREHISTORIC The Ozarks have an earth history that takes us back millions of years. Looking at them now—a highly dissected forested plateau criss-crossed by innumerable streams, springs, v-shaped rugged ravines, high bluffs, and plenty of rocky openings—it is difficult to realize that they were once covered by sea water. Twice since that time (after the close of the Paleo- zoic era) the Ozark land surface has been worn down to a low, comparatively level plain with swamps and with slow-flowing streams meandering through a largely forested area. Such a prehistoric scene might best be exemplified today by the forested tracts in Big Oak State Park and in other sections of the southeastern Missouri Lowlands. Twice also (once at the close of the Cretaceous period about 100 million years ago, and again towards the close of the Tertiary period about one million years ago) this low-lying Ozark land was gradually raised upwards a few hundred feet to over a thousand feet to become “high and dry.” Such a change resulted in this region taking on a “new look.” Instead of the sluggish streams, swamps, poor drainage, and land near or a few hundred feet above sea-level, there appeared clear, dashing, mountain streams, and well-drained land with newly exposed rock strata. The giant forces of weathering and erosion carved and chiselled the rocks and produced new irregularities on the contour of the land. The original low swampy area covered mostly with a dense and luxurious forest of bald cypress, swamp cottonwood, swamp hickory, water elm, overcup oak, basket oak, cork oak, water locust, swamp red maple, swamp tupelo, and pumpkin ash, some of whose ancestors (generically) can be traced back in the fossil record to the Mesozoic era—gradually changed into one resembling the present Ozark landscape with its diversity of trees and shrubs. 'Dr. Steyermark, of the Chicago Natural History Museum staff, is an authority not only on the Ozark flora but of the floras of Central America and Venezuela as well. He is a native St. Louisan who acquired his strong interest in our native flora as a boy in our city schools and went on to Washington University and to graduate work in the Henry Shaw School of Botany. We are proud to have him as a consulting member of our staff and to assist in a small way with his continuing studies of the flora of Missouri. MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN 3 Fig. 2. Huzzah Creek. The change-over to an upland of rocky drier soils and a dissected well- drained land surface obliterated from most of the Ozark area the dominant vegetation of the low-lying swamp forests, but some of it persisted. Cane (Arundinaria gigantea), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), possum haw (Ilex decidua), carolina buckthorn (Rhamnus caroliniana), supple-Jack (Berchemia scandens), and fringe tree (Chionanthus virginica) held out or adapted themselves (over a period of thousands of years) on the higher, drier, and often rocky ground. Refugee plants of some of the swampy areas persisted in depressions of the upland in sink-hole ponds, the vegetation of which is mostly reminiscent of the Coastal Plain. Other survivors of the last uplift that were characteristic of this swampy forest followed the course of the White River and its tributaries in southwestern Missouri and along Eleven Points, Black, and Current rivers in southeastern Missouri. Then gradually resulted a shifting to and occupation of various soils and habitats. Fresh rock exposures in the form of bluffs, “glades”’, and “barrens” became available to plant life over a long period of time. The surface soils of the upland, overlying largely a sandstone or chert or granite mantle, sup- ported a much sparser and thinner forest cover than the ravines, valleys, and limestone slopes. Certain species of plants favored the exposed limestone strata, while others took to the more acidic sandstone, cherts, and igneous granites and trachytes. Various oaks and hickories eventually dominated the upland surface. Flowering dogwood and redbud became dominants in the forest understory. Chinquapin oak, blue ash, and sugar maple came to occupy the more limey soils, while southern yellow pine, red maple, and sour gum established themselves along ravine slopes, narrow ridges, and the tops 4 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN of bluffs where the soil was acid and where lime had been leached out. Ward’s willow, Ozark witch-hazel, alder, and sycamore moved onto the gravel bars and edges of the smaller streams, while silver maple, green ash, river birch, cottonwood, and black willow occupied the deeper, richer, alluvial deposits of the valieys. What a fascinating bit of evolution had been going on throughout this long period of transformation of the Ozarks! On the rocky upland lime- stone bluffs and glades developed such distinct species as Ozark cedar (Juniperus Ashei), Trelease’s larkspur (Delphinium Treleasei), lead plant (Amorpha brachycarpa), false gromwell (Onosmodium subsetosum), pen- stemon (Penstemon Cobaea var. purpureus), Bush’s skullcap (Scutellaria Bushii), and corn salad (Valerianella ozarkana and V. Bushii). In the Ozark woodlands of thousands of years ago evolved three distinct kinds of spider- worts (Tradescantia ozarkana, T. Ernestiana, and T. longipes), Ozark trillium (Trillium ozarkanum), Ozark chestnut (Castanea ozarkensis), vari- ous hawthorns (Crataegus padifolia, C. Lettermani, C. sicca, C. noelensis, C. dis pessa, C. latebrosa, and C. nuda), a variety of poppy mallow (Callirhoc involucrata var. Bushii), yellow foxglove (Gerardia calycosa), bedstraw (Galium arkansanum), and an aster (Aster anomalus). Along the gravel bars and valleys of the Ozarks evolved Ozark witch-hazel (Hamamelis vernalis), amsonia (Amsonia illustris), and ironweed (Veronia crinita). Two distinct species of alum-roots (Heuchera missouriensis in Missouri, and H. arkansana in Arkansas) developed around crevices of limestone bluffs, while on isolated sandy outcrops emerged Geocarpon minimum, a tiny annual found nowhere else in the world, and along wet open ground in southwestern Mis- souri evolved a certain kind of meadowbeauty (Rhexia interior). Each of the above species is known to occur in a wild state only in the Ozarks of Missouri or adjacent areas of Missouri and Arkansas. These plants originated in the Ozarks sometime in the dim past during the long history of this region. Botanists call such plants, limited in their geographic distribu- tion to a small circumscribed area, ‘‘endemics”. The splitting off of the ancestral witch-hazel and chestnut stocks to produce respectively Hamamelis vernalis and Castanea ozarkensis must have occurred before the last Tertiary uplift of the Ozarks nearly one million years ago, because after this time intervening areas isolated or separated the Ozarks from those regions where the ancestral stock was present. Today the Ozark chestnut is separated by thousands of miles from the nearest stations in the east where its closest relative, the eastern chestnut (Castanea dentata) grows. The two regions have been separated from each other before the last uplift, so it can be imagined how long a time has intervened. Forests in which ancestral chestnut trees were existing must have occurred in the Ozarks and elsewhere millions MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN 5 of years ago. What now remains of the split up into two distinct species (Castanea ozarkensis of the Ozarks and Castanea dentata of the eastern states) is what has survived this breaking up of the ancestral chestnut strain. Clinging to north-facing, shaded, moist bluffs along Ozark streams or hiding in sheltered, forested canyons and ravines are numerous kinds of plants which represent relicts or survivors from the Ice Age. During this time of generally reduced temperatures many species of plants migrated southward into the Ozarks and elsewhere and survived in situations favor- able to their existence. As the ice sheet melted and withdrew northward, the general climate southward became warmer and many of these species died. Some, however, managed to survive the more adverse warmer and drier situations, and today we find them hanging on in these sheltered spots of moist bluffs and deep shaded ravines, even though surrounded by the otherwise generally drier environment. At the same time, during the Ice Age, many other eastern and northern species migrated into the Ozark valleys and into the forests. Some of them which moved into wet meadows of limey soil kept moist by spring seepage are found nowhere else in Missouri. Similarly, at some time in its long earth history, and prior or subsequent to its last uplift, the Ozarks have been receiving species from the Southwest (such as Stenosiphon linifolius, Andrachne phyllanthoides, Pallafoxia callosa) , from the southern Appalachians (Berberis canadensis, Trautvetteria carolin- iensis), and from the southern states and elsewhere. It is obvious, then, when considering the Ozark region, an appreciation must first be had of the long and diverse geological history together with the many changes that have taken place. After the last uplift and subsequent change to a dissected, well-drained, drier land, the dominant swamp forests gave way to other forest types, including an oak-hickory forest which pre- vailed over much of the Ozark area. Rocky exposed surfaces and prairie patches were widespread, but in the long period of time have changed their locations, and probably were more extensive in some localities (especially when the rock strata became exposed to erosion following uplift). It would require a much longer paper to discuss the many lines of evi- dence that indicate the ancient and continued forested condition of the Ozarks. That forests have long dominated and been associated with the region may be adduced from such evidence as: (1) the survival of some of the original swamp forest species in a drier upland habitat indicating a pre- existing ancestral lowland forest; (2) the natural geographical range of various trees—southern yellow pine, sour gum, scarlet oak, to mention a few—restricted in Missouri to the Ozark region, indicating that their north- ern limits have been determined primarily by the southern advance of one of the ice sheets during the Ice Age and secondarily by soil acidity; (3) the 6 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN segregation of chestnut and witch-hazel stocks into separate eastern and western species indicating a long period of evolution and separation into Ozarkian and eastern forests; (4) the occurrence of yellowwood and Ameri- can smoke tree, species of disrupted geographical range, on the old land surfaces of the Ozarks, the southern Appalachians, and elsewhere in areas that escaped glaciation of the Ice Age and submergence by Tertiary seawater, are evidence of trees whose fossil ancestry (generically) can be traced back to the Age of Dinosaurs (Mesozoic time). They and other ancient types are surviving mainly in the White River country of southwestern Missouri, but probably were much more widespread in the Ozarks many thousands of years ago; (5) the adjustment of trees and shrubs to various types of environment (exposure, soil acidity) has required thousands of years; (6) the original limited distribution within the Ozarks of a number of endemic species asso- ciated with strictly forested conditions. RECENT HISTORY AND THE PRESENT Let us picture the Ozarks as, from the beginning, mainly a naturally forested area of remarkable diversity, with certain tree types confined to valleys, others to acid or alkaline soils, others to glades, ravines, or uplands. Over the thousands of years such mainly forest-inhabiting birds, as turkeys, and mammals, such as bears, prospered in the dense Ozark forests. That other game was abundant is testified by records of early settlers. Streams were clear, because there was neither pollution from sewage or industrial waste nor run-off from soil exposed by excessive grazing, cultivation. or logging. The soil was mainly protected by a dense forest cover. The rela- tively small Indian population did not make any great demands on the forests and land. The result was a definite balance of Nature, Nature and man at that time living more or less in harmony. While Ozark forests have been cut since the time of the early white settlers, no appreciable change is perceptible in the type or amount of forest and forest cover since the first known records of Ozark vegetation. This can be verified by a study of the field notes of the original land surveys of Missouri deposited in the Land Vault of the office of the Secretary of State in the State Capitol at Jefferson City, Missouri. These land surveys, made approximately 100-130 years ago, indicate that what at that time was good forest with a certain kind of underbrush is today (except where spoiled by civilization activities) likewise a good forest with the same type of under- brush. Places within and outside of the Ozarks which are prairie today (glades and barrens are included in the prairie category of the surveys) were also prairie in the early part of the nineteenth century. What has happened during 100-130 years is easily told. The gradual increase in population has brought a conflict between man in the Ozarks and MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN vE Nature. In his haste to get “rich quick” or make a living off the land, man has often stolen from the natural resources, with the attendant disregard for the laws of Nature. Demand for pulpwood and lumber has increased over the years; more forests each year are being cut indiscriminately; residential and industrial sites are clearing areas once forested; agricultural development is occupying more land; pasturing and grazing of woodlands is on an in- crease; dams are impounding and destroying large sectors of the Ozarks; and, in general, the American people are losing more and more of their origina! Ozark heritage. The balance of Nature has gradually been upset and only within the past couple of decades has Ozark man seriously pondered on how he can once more live with and manage Nature. The establishment of Missouri National Forests under the direction of the National Forest Service and the Missouri Conservation Commission has helped to solve the critical problems posed by man living in the Ozarks. In the meantime, overgrazing and annual burning have continued to strip off the ground cover and the original humus in many sections of the Ozarks. Erosion has set in, carrying away the thin soil and leaf litter and leaving bare rocks exposed. When timber is cut away from headwaters of streams or fire allowed to run rampant over such areas, the absorbent spongy leaf mulch is removed and eventually springs fail to run and streams dry up. The fires, excessive cutting, and overgrazing either kill or drive away the original anima! life of the area. Many farmers still burn the woods with the mistaken notion that by so doing they are ridding the brush of chiggers, ticks, snakes, and other vermin, or making grass come back for grazing. It is obvious that the lack of appreciation for an adequate forest cover, fire protection, good grazing practices, limited cutting, and for reforestation is a failure to maintain a balance with Nature. Man’s selfish exploits of Ozark resources with little or no consideration for wildlife, forest cover, and habitat are doing much to worsen the general situation. Only during these recent tragic years of drouth, when streams and wells begin to run dry, cattle and poultry die, crops go to ruin and the livelihood of citizens becomes affected—only then is a beginning of concern shown for the future. During a survey of drought-stricken counties in the Ozarks during 1952 and 1953, the field men (biologists, foresters, and conservation agents) of the Missouri Conservation Commission studied the effects of the drought from various angles and points of view. In general, it was found that wherever good habitat conditions prevailed (i.e. good food, water, and cover), the game population of that area was also good. It was also found that there had been entirely too much grazing for the carrying capacity of the land. The land could not “take it’. The overgrazing was as much responsible for poor wildlife habitat as was the drought. Especially was this true of woodlands MISSOURI BOTA HARRISON | MERCER PUTNAM t SULLIVAN | ADAI GRUNDY | INN MACC LIVINGSTON | + catoweLe _ | CLINTON oe 4 CHARITON CARROLL LAFAYETTE — —__ | cooper PETTIS Ie | FEayCAMOEN SAINT CLAIR” ©” VERNON BARTON GREENE ©) sasrer NEWTON CHRISTIAN Pa STONE! | g pet a TAN McDONALD eee Map of Missouri, showing areas of botanical inter Drawn by Douglas E. Tibbitts, Staff Artist, Chicag YEN BULLETIN LEGEND: Large springs Sink hole ponds Swampy meadows Pickle Springs Jam-up Bluff Tupelo Gum Pond Dryopreris cristata var. C/lintoniana (©) Cheilanthes lanosa (tomentosa) (©) Geocarpon minimum © Elk Lick Springs Nunatak Ozark localities ’ Granite & porphyritic trachyte outcrops ‘Limestone “glades" & “bald knobs" yj.Lamotte sandstone 1; Me outcrops CQO@OREO / PIKE LINCOLN om \LL AWAY ._., | WARREN SAINT CHARLES SAINT LOUIS ; E | ee 4 7 Sjpawewes a — : ___| CRAWFORD {seit a WASHINGTON We i /oPHELPS : ra a ae Francos/ ; @) - Ps iis f Lig Ii : | DENT on pag B Vy, Fe et. . a M chal ; | REYNOLDS ~— | pee © hoe Bw GH ee oe % HIN 3 WAYNE : a mee UO) on oR A: STODDARD MISSISSIPPI cs | BUTLER \ =e \ \ ( ~ | NEW MADRID fDUNKLIN) 4 ; aes Rs region. PEMISCOT ‘y Museum. 10 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN Fig. 3. The uplifting of the Ozark Plateau has resulted in steep bluffs along all the major streams. This view along Jacks Fork is typical of thousands of scenes in the central Ozarks. Red cedars, blue ash, and chinquapin ocak veil the margins of the bluff. Ferns, columbines and other rock-loving plants are here and there in shaded niches. The old weathered limestone is of the sort appreciated for centuries by Chinese artists, and seen from the river in the springtime the bluff reminds one strongly of a Chinese screen painting. MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN 11 in which grazing and clearing reduced the protective ground cover, thus exposing the land surface to increased evaporation by wind, and an eventual damaging of ground vegetation. FUTURE The last two drought spells (1934-1936 and 1952-54) are beginning to sound an alarm and show the ever-increasing impertance of water. Since conservation of water is the great problem in times of drought in the Ozarks and elsewhere, it behooves us to realize the most effective means of living under conditions of reduced rainfall. Ozark inhabitants are apt to believe that drought is an unusual phenomenon and are wondering how best to live with the situation. Actually, however, it is likely that in the long period of Ozark history as a land surface, there have been many such dry spells. There have been prolonged periods of drought, such as is believed to have occurred in the Midwest, a few thousand years ago during the so-called “xerothermic period”. During such a time the Ozarks may well have become drier and certain species of trees and shrubs may have replaced others less adaptable to the dry weather. Rocky glades may have been common at that time in areas where they are now absent. Nevertheless, notwithstanding the fluctuation of rainfall throughout the past thousands of years, the Ozarks and their forest have come through, surviving in large measure the periodic drought spells. Perhaps the Ozarks are in for another period of reduced rainfall and for warmer average temperatures. If so, a dweller in the Ozarks, whether he be agriculturist, industrialist, tourist, or what not, will have to adjust himself to the changing situation, or, shail we say a situation that has been repeated many times in Ozark history. The great increase of population has placed 4 stress and strain on the water, soil, and forest resources of the Ozarks, and during periods of drought, such as the present, the stress is more noticeable. It is apparent that the Ozarks during drought years cannot support con- tinued increased grazing. By interfering with Nature as little as possible and having consideration for her laws would seem to be our best solution for getting along in and with the Ozarks. The following list of don’ts appears to be in order: (1) don’t cut timber, allow grazing, or allow fires to spread around head- waters of streams; (2) don’t overgraze anywhere; (3) don’t permit fires and grazing to rob the natural absorbent leaf mulch and cover from the soil, thereby permitting erosion to set in and carry away the top soil. A noted forester with over twenty years of experience in the Ozarks recently noticed that the flow of a stream in a certain wooded section of the Ozark National Forest remained normal during the past years of drought. He explained this and similar situations within parts of the Ozark National 12 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN Forest on the basis of sound forestry conservation practice of: (1) retaining a dense leaf mulch over the soil; (2) preserving the undergrowth in its natural state; and (3) preserving the timber in its natural state around the headwaters of the streams. Surely, such elementary principles must be ad- hered to if we are to conserve our water. A good forested condition with abundant cover for game and all kinds of animals will insure an Ozarks that will continue to harbour abundant wildlife. Keeping the waters free from sewage pollution and industrial waste will improve fishing conditions. All evidence indicates that the Ozarks are a natural forested area. The extensive forest cover, left relatively undisturbed, insures continued leaf mulch over the soil. The spongy humus absorbs the water which passes into the ground and keeps the streams and springs running. We must learn to live with these forests. To help conserve the water supply, keep out the fires, limit the grazing and cutting, reduce the extensive clearing of forested areas, restore the original tree and shrub cover from areas where it has been removed. Failure to heed such rules will certainly bring disaster a day closer. We must keep the Ozarks a natural playground of clear streams hemmed in by forests, where burning, grazing, and cutting have been kept to a mini- mum. If agricultural and industrial developments are to continue within the Ozarks, they must be in harmony with the spirit of sound conservation of soil, water, forests, and wildlife. Fig. 4. “Shut-ins’” where the St. Francis River has cut through granite near Old Silver Mine, Iron County. MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN 13 Book REVIEWws:— The Trees and Shrubs of the Southwestern Deserts. By Lyman Benson and Robert A. Darrow. 447 pp., 84 figs., 34 pls. Tucson and Albuquerque, 1954. $8.50. It is a pleasure to note that this beautiful book is again in print. Tech- nically a second edition, it difters from the original only in an additional sentence here and there and a few additional plates. In print less than three years after its appearance as a bulletin of the University of Arizona in 1944, it is now republished in somewhat more elegant format (and at a much higher price!) jointly by the University of Arizona and the University of New Mexico. This twin sponsorship more nearly indicates the locaticn of the desert areas treated, although on this score both California and Nevada might equally well have lent support. It is no wonder that the second edition differs so little from the first, for it is hard to imagine how this book could be improved. It treats of all the woody plants of the southwestern deserts, with keys, descriptions, illustra- tions, distributional data and maps, and, in many instances, notes relating to the history of the plant, its use by the aboriginal Indians, its economic or medicinal uses, its horticultural possibilities, etc. There is an excellent intro- duction on the vegetation of the deserts together with notes on adjacent vegetational zones; in giving the distribution of each species the types described in this introduction are consistently used to make precise state- ments of where the plants are to be found. There are distribution maps for scores of species. These are conveniently uniform in size and coverage so that comparison between species is easy. However, despite their relatively large size, a third of a page, they are less clear than one might wish; the cross-hatched detail in them is very dark while the green overprint showing distribution is so light as sometimes not to be easily seen. There are many fine photographs, both in black and white and in color, and many excellent line drawings. For those who are novices in plant identification there is a well-illustrated and clearly written introduction to this fascinating art. No one who cares even a little for the vegetation about him will want to be without this volume when he travels through our Southwest, or for that matter, through Mexico; the international boundary does not delimit biological areas.—George B. Van Schaack 14 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN Manual of the Plants of Colorado. By H. D. Harrington. 676 pp., 1 pl. Sage Books, Denver, Colo., 1954. $8.00. Every one interested in the flora of Colorado will want to have a copy of this book, for it is the only recent complete guide to the plants of that fas- cinating state. Its nearly 700 pages are almost all devoted to keys and descriptions in a courageous attempt to fulfill its “primary purpose .. . to provide a means of identifying the plants of Colorado”. In so far as such devices can accomplish such a purpose the book is adequate; the dichotomous keys, conveniently indented, are moderately detailed with clearly stated characters, and the descriptions are reasonably complete. A meritorious feature, almost an innovation, is the strict parallelism in the descriptions of species within a genus; if the presence or absence of a character is noted for One species it is noted for all. No attempt is made to present a revisionary treatment of any group, and the author has commendably not included a single new species (undoubtedly a record!). In many of the groups the latest monographic treatment has been followed but without trying to equal- »> ize the meanings of the terms “subspecies” and “variety”? between various writers; one must check the application of these concepts in the original monographs. Such additional information as there is the author gives, as he says, with the thought that it may be helpful to this one or to that one. The only quarrel one can have with this aim must regard the actual helpfulness of the information. The citations of original publication of names have admittedly not been checked; it is certainly unfortunate to print nomenclatural mistakes in yet one more place. The general distribution of each species is given on the basis of various published accounts; the distribution in Colorado is stated in terms of specimens checked by the author or by specialists who assisted him. But so many of these statements are far from helpful. The author has arbitrarily divided the state into nine rectangles of equal area, labelling them e € ‘northwestern’, “northcentral”, “northeastern”, etc. It is scarcely of much help to be told that the new and only collection of Alisma geyeri in Colorado is in the northwestern corner at about 6000 feet. A great deal of this area, which covers one ninth of the state, is at about that elevation. The state has counties and towns. It is doubtful that the continuance of Alisma geyeri in Colorado would have been seriously threatened by stating its known locality to within, say, ten miles of some town and to within one or two points of the compass. David F. Costello, range conservationist, has supplied an account of several pages on the vegetation zones of the state. This is well done, and if carefully read in connection with a knowledge of the geography of the state and the identity of the plants, it gives a very excellent picture of the plant MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN 15 cover. It is a pity that Mr. Harrington did not work more closely with Mr. Costello and integrate his distributional data with the clear descriptions given by the latter. For example, greasewood is stated to grow on “usually flat ground” “over the western part of Colorado”. Greasewood is far more uncommon than flat [level?] ground in western Colorado. Much more im- portant is it that the area be semi-desert. With the understanding that Mr. Costello’s classification would be used, it would have been much more en- lightening to state: “semi-desert areas, chiefly in the ‘greasewood’ association”. (The redundancy is only apparent.) Also, it is not clear whether the habitats given for a species refer to its whole distribution or only to that in the state; to cite Alisma geyeri again, “wet places” can scarcely refer to a single collection. But one must not be too critical, for this book is a labor of love. The flora is large and complex. The 2794 species listed grow from below 3400 feet to above 14,000 feet. The author has had assistance, it is true, but this is his work and it is a monument to ten years’ striving. What a shame that after all his devoted labor he had to see his work appear in so inconvenient a format, pages of typewriter-sheet size with the text typed! The book is thus unhandy to use, impossible for the field, and wearing on the eyes. Nor is there a single figure or map to be found in the volume, aside from an outline map of the state. Mr. Harrington’s book was “prepared with the coopera- tion of Colorado A. & M. College’, a government institution, but the gov- ernment as represented there apparently showed no interest in the format of so important a publication.—George B. Van Schaack The Pruning Manual. By Everett P. Christopher. 340 pp., 12 pls., 53 figs. The Macmillan Co., New York, 1954. Price $5.00. Dr. Christopher, head of the Horticultural Department in the University of Rhode Island, has written this book as a successor to the late Liberty Hyde Bailey’s book of the same name. In addition to general fundamentals, there are chapters on apple, grape, and rose pruning, a special one on dwarf trees as well as discussions of the special problems of deciduous fruits, subtropical fruits, and nut trees. Shade and ornamental trees, as well as ornamental shrubs and vines, are separately dealt with. There is a short and charming preface by Bailey, one of the last things he wrote. The book is clearly and simply written and should serve the needs of amateur and_ professional gardeners.—Edgar Anderson. 16 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN THE ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN In addition to this BULLETIN the Garden also publishes the ANNALS OF THE Missourt BOTANICAL GARDEN, a conservative scientific journal in dark brown covers which comes out four times a year. In doing so it carries out certain of the provisions in Mr. Shaw’s will which provided for “scientific investigations in Botany” and for the dissemination of such knowledge among men. The final number for 1954 recently appeared; its seventy-five pages are given over to papers by two of Dr. Andrews’ students, Charles J. Felix and Burton R. Anderson, who received their doctorates last spring in the Henry Shaw School of Botany of Washington University. Though the titles look forbidding with their mentions of “Arborescent Lycopod Fructifica- uns” and “American Petrified Calamites” they summarize a fascinating field of science in which the School of Botany has taken the lead in this country, the modern study of coal balls. Coal balls are nodules of fossil remains, frequently as large as a man’s head, which are found in great numbers in certain types of coal. By in- genious techniques, paper-thin slices can be prepared and studied in detail under the microscope. Thousands of such sections have been accumulated in Dr. Andrews’ laboratory, and they are as fascinating as they are baffling; fascinating, because most of the microscopic details of leaves, stems, roots, and seeds are so beautifully preserved that it is difficult to imagine that they are indeed millions of years old; baffling, because they are made up of in- coherent litter. Each ball is composed of thousands of fragments, big and little all jumbled together like a scientific fruit cake. The sections just cut down through everything, stem, roots, leaves, seeds, spores; most of them fragmentary, all of them packed together hit or miss. One gets to know the leaves as well or better than he knows the leaves of modern trees and to understand in the greatest detail the construction of certain types of stems. But which stems go with which twigs and which leaves go with which stems, and can any of the spores or seeds be certainly identified as belonging with any of the stem or leaf types? It is like trying to reconstruct the life of a city from its pulverized bombed fragments. Dr. Felix’s paper deals with coal- age plants related to our ground pines, and among other things he makes a beginning at identifying the various kinds of spores. Dr. Anderson’s paper is concerned with the calamites, close relatives of our modern horsetails and scouring rushes. Dr. Felix is now with the Federal Bureau of Mines where such information and such techniques as those he acquired here are of great practical as well as theoretical importance, while Dr. Anderson has gone on to serve his term with the U. S. army. THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES JouHNn S. LEHMANN, President Henry HitcHcock DaniEL K. CaTLin, Vice-President RicHarD J. Lockwoop EuGcENE Pettus, Second Vice-President A. WeEssEL SHAPLEIGH LEICESTER B. Faust ETHAN A. H. SHEPLEY DupLEY FRENCH ROBERT BROOKINGS SMITH EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ETHAN A. H. SHEPLEY, H. M. Srouar, Chancellor of Washington University President of the Board of Education of St. Louis ARTHUR C, LICHTENBERGER, Bishop of the Diocese of Missouri a STRATFORD LEE MORTON, RayMOND R. TUCKER, President of the Academy of Science Mayor of the City of St. Louis of St. Louis Secretary GERALD ULRICI THE HORTICULTURAL COUNCIL Clifford W. Benson, Clarence Barbre, Albert Chandler, E. G. Cherbonnier, Paul Hale, Mrs. Hazel Knapp, Emmet Layton, Clarence McGovern, Gilbert Pennewill, Mrs Roland R. Read, W. F. Scott, Jr., Harold E. Wolfe, John S. Lehmann, Edgar Anderson, John Nies, Chairman. STAFF Gearcl Fe Mootsies ceeetncl eee ee ere eetor PA PBC RIO ices ccieinnnnccete accion Director ey Pi COS aa ase Paleobotanist August P, Beilmann Manager of the Arboretum, Gray Summit Louis G. Brenner=2 _Assistant Manager of the Arboretum Ladislaus Cutak.......___- Horticulturist in charge of Conservatories Hugh C, Cutler... Assistant Director and Curator of the Museum Carroll W. Dodge —-.-— Mycologist John D. Dwyer_. Pe ete RRR Ie ee RL I A Research Associate Robert J. Gillespie ___Research Horticulturist its Tel 1 Dec (0) ¢ |_| cin nee een nen macnn Ae ee =! Librarian and Editor Ida M. Kohl eee _Assistant Librarian Tt Ge Va) | Se ce ae eee nee ee aes Seah ee RRR nee mE EC ERS ae see Floriculturist G. R. Lowry ae __...._........--In charge of Orchids i NR a ee alison deanestese Assistant Librarian jo Pes hts) Oe Pa) a a en er ee er ence ne ne Dendrologist George H. Pring ae ren eres Superintendent Berry Cre POCO y ics tin resi Assistant to the Director Kenneth A, Smith __ : 2a neat acticncivesmmcce ke FAROE Julian A. Steyermark_.._- = Honorary Research Associate (oS CES U7) 5 ee he a eae ee Renn Research Associate Rolla M. Tryon, Jr. Assistant Curator of Herbarium Gerald Ulrici a __ Business Manager George B. Van Schaack Honorary Curator of Grasses Robert E. Woodson, Jr... Curator of Herbarium PUBLICATIONS FOR SALE AT THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN. Published in February, May, September, and November. Sub- scription price, $10 per year. MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN. Published monthly except July and August. Subscription price, $2.50 per year. A TOUR OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN. A guide for Garden visitors. Price 25 cents. HENRY SHAW. A Pictorial Biography. Price 25 cents. THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN What it is and what it does. Price, fifty cents. POST-CARDS. Garden Views. Eight views. Price 25¢ a card. Garden Water-lilies. Price 25 cents for set of 8. VIISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BULLETIN (ghee emu ae . a, =