Douora JOURNAL OF THE NEW ENGLAND BOTANICAL CLUB Conducted and published for the Club, by MERRITT LYNDON FERNALD, Editor-in-Chief JAMES FRANKLIN COLLINS CHARLES ALFRED WEATHERBY >? Associate Editors LUDLOW GRISCOM f VOLUME 35 1933 The New England Botanical Club, Ine. 8 and 10 West King St., Lancaster, Pa. Room 1001, 53 State St., Boston, Mass. JAN 18 1333 Hovdora JOURNAL OF THE NEW ENGLAND BOTANICAL CLUB Conducted and published for the Club, by MERRITT LYNDON FERNALD, Editor-in-Chief JAMES FRANKLIN COLLINS CHARLES ALFRED WEATHERBY , Associate Editors LUDLOW GRISCOM Vol. 35. January, 1933. No. 409. CONTENTS: Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora. M. L. Fernald... 1 Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives. K. M. Wiegand..... 16 Desmodium glabellum in northeastern Connecticut. A.W. Upham 38 Diarrhena festucoides again. M. L. Fernald.............. esses 39 Ficus Carica in Massachusetts. S. N. F. Sanford. ........... Ls. 40 The New England Botanical Club, Ine. 8 and 10 West King St., Lancaster, Pa. Room 1001, 53 State St., Boston, Mass. RHODORA.—A monthly journal of botany, devoted primarily to the flora of New England. Price, $2.00 per year, net, postpaid, in funds payable at par in United States currency in Boston; single copies (if available) 20 cents. Volumes 1-8 or some single numbers from them can be supplied only at advanced prices which will be furnished on application. Notes and short scientific papers, relating directly or indirectly to the plants of the northeastern states, will be considered for publication to the extent that the limited space of the journal permits. Forms will be closed five weeks in advance of publication. Authors (of more than two pages of print) will receive 25 copies of the issue in which their con- tributions appear. Extracted reprints, if ordered in advance, will be furnished at cost. Address manuscripts and proofs to M. L. FERNALD, 14 Hawthorn Street, Cambridge, Mass. Subscriptions (making all remittances payable to RHODORA) to Ludlow Griscom, 8 W. King St., Lancaster, Pa., or Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass. Entered at Lancaster, Pa. Post Office as Second Class Mail Matter. INTELLIGENCER PRINTING COMPANY Specialists in Scientific and Technical Publications EIGHT WEST KING ST., LANCASTER, PA. CARD-INDEX OF NEW GENERA, SPECIES AND VARIETIES OF AMERICAN PLANTS, 1885 TO DATE. For American taxonomists and all students of American plants the most important supplement to the Index Kewensis, this catalogue in several ways exceeds the latter work in detail, since it lists not only the flowering plants, but ferns and other vascular cryptogams, and in- cludes not merely genera and species, but likewise subspecies, var- ieties and forms. A work of reference invaluable for larger herbaria, leading libraries, academies of sciences, and other centers of botanical activity. Issued quarterly, at $22.50 per 1000 cards. GRAY HERBARIUM of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., U. S. A. CHECK LIST OF GRAY’S MANUAL, 7th EDITION, compiled by M. A. Day. Leatherette. Pocket size. Invaluable for collector’s memoranda and herbarium records. Published and sold by the Gray HERBARIUM, Cambridge, Mass. Price postpaid 20 cts. each. Ten copies $1.50. MEMOIRS OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM. A series of illustrated quarto papers issued at irregular intervals, sold separatelv. No. III. The Linear-leaved North American Species of Potamogeton, pod Axillares, by M. L. Fernald. 183 pp., 40 plates, 31 maps. 1932. 3.00. Gray Herbarium of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Advertisements of Nurserymen and Dealers in Botanical and other Scien- tific Publications are inserted in these pages at the following rates per space of 4 in. by 3/4 in. 1 year $4.00, 6 months $2.50. Rhodora Plate 232 Bayard Lona (right) and Jonn MivrowN Foca, sr. (left) on the north slope of TH TABLELAND, Bonne Bay. TRbooora JOURNAL OF THE NEW ENGLAND BOTANICAL CLUB Vol. 35. January, 1933. No. 409. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE GRAY HERBARIUM OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY—NO. CI. RECENT DISCOVERIES IN THE NEWFOUNDLAND FLORA M. L. FERNALD (Plates 232-271)! Part I. JOURNAL or 1926 AND 1929 I have already published two extended accounts? of botanical work in Newfoundland and some other papers? in which the great interest and the relic endemism or isolation of plants in Newfoundland has been much emphasized. Very briefly summarized some of the many 1 The snap-shots of topography, unless otherwise stated, are my own. The pho- tographs of plants have been prepared, with aid from the Milton Fund for Research of Harvard University, by Dn. Hvau M. Rave or by Mr. CuanLEs BuLLARD, whose unlimited kindness I wish here to acknowledge. The large cost of reproduction of the plates has been wholly met by my ever loyal companion, Mr. Bayarp Lona. The preparation of the maps has been possible through the Milton Fund for Re- search. "The polar projection used in some maps is Goode's No. 201 Pc, copyrighted and published by the University of Chicago. Some plates, cited in early parts of the paper, will appear in later instalments, where more appropriate. t 2 A Botanical Expedition to Newfoundland and Southern Labrador (Contrib. Gray Herb. n. s. no, xl.), Ruopona xiii. 109—162, plates 86—91 (1911). Two Summers of Botanizing in Newfoundland (Contrib. Gray Herb. Ixxvi.) Ruo- DORA XXviii. 49-63, 74—87, 89-111, 115—120, 145-155, 161—178, 181-204, 210—225, 234—241, plates 153—155 (1926, 1927). 3 The Contrasts in the Floras of Eastern and Western Newfoundland. Am. Journ. Bot. v. 237-247 (1918). Persistence of Plants in Unglaciated Areas of Boreal America (Mem. Gray Herb., no, ii.) Mem. Am. Acad. xv. no. iii. (1925). Some Relationships of the Floras of the Northern Hemisphere. Proc. Intern. Congr. Pl. Sci. ii. 1487-1507 (1929). Unglaciated Western Newfoundland. Harvard Alumni Bull. Jan. 23, 1930 (with photographs of characteristic topography). Specific Segregations and Identities in some Floras of Eastern North America and the Old World (Contrib. Gray Herb. xciii.), Rgopona, xxxiii, 25—63, plate 204 (1931). 2 Rhodora [JANUARY points of phytogeographic interest are: (1) the restricted areas in Newfoundland of at least the later glaciations of the Pleistocene, with the result that a large element of the flora seems to have persisted unscathed through the Pleistocene or, at any rate, through the Wisconsin (or Labradorean) glaciation; (2) the high degree of en- demism in the flora of the West Coast, from Cape Ray to Cape Norman; (3) the identity or close affinity of much of the flora of western Newfoundland with that of the Arctic Archipelago and arctic Eurasia and, in some cases, with that of the Cordilleran and Pacific regions of North America; (4) the representation of a number of groups now found mostly in the Southern Hemisphere and the Tropics, but also sharing Newfoundland with Nova Scotia and the Coastal Plain of the eastern United States, a flora apparently of Cretaceous origin which had its interchanges along the now submerged Cretaceous and Tertiary continental shelf; (5) the occurrence, especially on the Avalon Peninsula, of a considerable Atlantic European element unknown elsewhere in eastern America; (6) these isolated or relic elements and the endemic species occurring mostly as localized and often very restricted colonies in the widely diffused and everywhere common and comparatively uninteresting elements of the Canadian and Hudsonian forests, bogs, shores and barrens. To the field-botanist with temperamental ability to take things as they come, to work under disadvantageous conditions, to overlook the discomforts of perpetually fighting swarms of black-flies and mosquitoes, and to maintain a cheerful enthusiasm in spite of frequent deficiencies of diet and the regular failure of the announced schedules of boats to meet their obligations, western Newfoundland still offers almost virgin and unspoiled territory for fascinating exploration and important botanical discovery. The last general account of the work of parties of which I had the good fortune to be a member covered the summers of 1924 and 1925. The summer of 1926 was largely taken up for botanists of eastern America by the International Congress at Ithaca; but, having a short period of early autumn still available, my ever-ready companion, Mr. Bayard Long, and my genial student, now Dr. John Milton Fogg, joined me after the Ithaca meetings and we went, via Montreal, on one of the sumptuous steamships of the Clarke line to Corner Brook at the head (“bottom”) of the Bay of Islands, with the avowed purpose of locating at Lark Harbor, at the southern entrance to the Bay of Islands, thence, when the weather 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora 3 proved propitious, to go by motor boat southward along the outer cliff-wall to Serpentine River whence we could make a simple ap- proach to the unbotanized Lewis Hills, the highest mountains (2700 ft.) of Newfoundland. We planned to finish the trip by proceeding slightly east of Cape Ray to the region of Burgeo in order to get some idea of the flora of a thoroughly glaciated granitic area, to contrast with the flora of the unglaciated or, at least, recently un- glaciated West Coast. Entering Bay of Islands, we longed immediately to get at the sheer outer wall of trap rock which, broken only by tiny coves, extends far south, to Bluff Head. Passing Lark Harbor and steaming to the head of Humber Arm, we were there met by a motor boat sent in by our prospective host, Mr. Moses G. Sheppard, proprietor of the extensive fisheries at Lark Harbor; and toward mid-afternoon we started back about thirty miles over the steamship’s route, to Lark Harbor. The afternoon was windy, with black clouds overhanging the precipitous (nearly 2000 feet high) walls of Blomidon, and, in spite of sweaters and oilskins, we fully approved the local pronunciation, “Blow-me-down.” Passing the inner islands of the Bay and the outer cliffs of Blomidon in the evening light, we gazed in awe at the mountain-walls and, reaching Lark Harbor, were greeted from the wharf with the informative: “Well, gentlemen, dis is w’ot we calls de Bay of Hilands." Either way we thought of it the name seemed wholly appropriate, but somehow we got a feeling that we had just drifted ashore and were not supposed to know where we had landed. It was a fortunate haven, however: Mr. Sheppard, a progressive man of fine physique and sturdy character, genial, wholesome and hospitable, and busy through a long day; Mrs. Sheppard, a women of unusual poise and background, who, with at least two of the daughters, had seen much of the outside world; the twin sons and our efficient skipper, Pennell, alert and, like the others, anxious to make our botanizing successful. The Sheppards also had a fine garden of many vegetables, one of the desiderata in many New- foundland ports, and we were inclined, as we have not always been at fishing ports, to linger over our meals. When we awoke on the morning of August 30th, the weather was “dirty” and, in fact, for a full week we did not have a truly “civil” day. We botanized along the shore toward York Harbor, visited some of the islands, spent a day on the inner slope of Lark Mountain, 4 Rhodora [JANUARY and on one bright but very windy day Long and Fogg crossed over to explore the desert-like serpentine ridge which flanks the North Arm; but at no time would the wind let up and give us the calm weather necessary if we were to follow the outer sea-wall in a small boat and make a safe entry into the Serpentine. Waghorne had botanized about Lark Harbor, Eames and Godfrey had made a center at the copper mine above York Harbor, and Mackenzie and Griscom had got at Blomidon from Frenchman’s Cove; while Wiegand and I, in 1910, had twice visited Blomidon from Benoit’s Cove. Consequently, lingering at Lark Harbor merely to take advantage of calm weather, we did not undertake extensive trips away from head- quarters. But these short excursions into the neighboring region yielded fair returns, though, of course, Waghorne and his successors had already secured the more interesting species. The season had been unduly cold; snow of the preceding winter lingered in early September on many slopes; the general verdict was that there had been no summer; and we heard many accounts of unmelted snow-banks extending down to the sea along the Straits of Belle Isle. The vegetation in early autumn was in the usual mid- summer state; the plants which usually flower in late July or early August were just coming into bloom. The immediate neighborhood of Lark Harbor, we had been told, would be quite unspoiled and an ideal place for botanists, “absolutely wild, with lots of sheep and goats.” The sheep and goats had had full control; but from among the meagre remnants of vegetation we were able to pull out a solitary Botrychium simplex! and a few other vouchers which even they had missed. The inner slope of Lark Mountain, however, had good fences near the base and we soon got into wholly primitive mountain-woods, with Aster acuminatus and some other Canadian forest types which are not often seen in Newfoundland; in fact, the Aster had been known on the Island only from thickets at the southwest corner, Port aux Basques. Passing above timber line we were out on the open wind-swept lower edge of the tableland, but instead of being arctic-alpine as, in spite of many experiences, we still somehow expected the tablelands of western Newfoundland to be, it was in some features less *alpine" than the shores of the outer Bay. A 1 It seems unnecessary to encumber the narrative by giving the authors of species which are in the current manuals. They will be noted only in cases of change or for species not in Gray’s Manual. 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora 5 few “arctic-alpine” species of broad range and of general occurrence in almost any bleak or open habitat in Newfoundland were there: the inevitable Lycopodium Selago and L. annotinum var. pungens, Juniperus communis var. montana, Agrostis borealis, Hierochloe alpina, Scirpus cespitosus var. callosus Bigel., Carex rariflora, C. scirpoidea, Juncus trifidus, Salix Uva-ursi, Rubus Chamaemorus, Viola labradorica, Loiseleuria procumbens, Arctostaphylos alpina, Vaccinium uliginosum var. alpinum Bigel.! and Diapensia lapponica. However, these and many others, which in New England we call * arctic-alpine," are so nearly ubiquitous at all altitudes in Newfound- land that they were mostly on our “taboo-list,” not to be collected unless an extraordinarily fine or exceptional specimen was found. Consequently, they failed to stir our emotions. Far more interesting on the tableland were their more southern companions, a group of species characteristic of acid peats of New Jersey, southern New York, southern New England or Nova Scotia, here thriving, as they do on the great diorite tableland of Blomidon to the east, as well as on the high barrens of the interior, in the region of The Topsails (from Kitty's Brook and Gafftopsail east at least to the Millertown region), and in the peats at sea-level in southern Newfoundland. High up above the timber the more continuous mossy carpets were as suggestive of the New Jersey Pine Barrens as they were of the North: the flesh-pink to crimson Aster nemoralis and the slender Solidago uniligulata everywhere, with such of their regular Pine Barren associates as Agrostis scabra Willd., Muhlen- bergia uniflora (Muhl.) Fern. (var. terrae-novae Fern.?), Eriophorum tenellum and virginicum, Rynchospora fusca and alba, Carex exilis, trisperma var. Dillingsii and livida var. Grayana (Dewey) Fern.5, Juncus canadensis (var. sparsiflorus Fern.*), Habenaria clavellata and blephariglottis, Pogonia ophioglossoides, Calopogon pulchellus (scarce), Arethusa bulbosa, Sarracenia purpurea and Utricularia cornuta. Shallow pools were filled with Nymphozanthus variegatus (Engelm.) Fern.,> Eriocaulon septangulare and Potamogeton Oakesianus; and at the margins of pools or on seepy slopes in the peat the austral Juncus pelocarpus abounded, with the austral genus Xyris represented by X. montana and the austral Bartonia paniculata by the endemic 1 See RHODORA, xxv. 24 (1923). 2 RHODORA, xxix. 11 (1927). 3 RHODORA, xxviii. 8 (1926). 4 RHODORA, xxiii. 241 (1921). 5 RHODORA, xxi. 187 (1919). 6 Rhodora [JANUARY var. iodandra (Rob.) Fern.,! while the famous Pine Barren specialty, Schizaea pusilla (MAP 7), nestled among the Bartonia and Ryncho- sporas. Although a novel experience for Fogg, this was an old story to Long and me; in fact, as far back as 1910 Wiegand and I had first met? this wholly unexpected mingling of austral and circumpolar species on the top of Newfoundland (at 2000 feet altitude) on the broad diorite tableland of Blomidon; in 1911 Bartram and I encount- ered it in the Quarry and Maintopsail region and Wiegand and I had an experience with it on the Avalon Peninsula; and in 1924 Long, Dunbar and I had repeated the list, with a few additional species, on the Long Range back of Port aux Basques.* But the dominance of this austral flora on the high tablelands of Newfoundland has not yet lost its thrill and we are repeatedly tempted to ascend new blocks of the great dissected tableland (the uplifted Cretaceous Peneplane)* of western Newfoundland to rediscover this amazing “alpine” flora, which to the south and east on the Island comes down to sea-level. September Ist on Lark Mountain saw the beginning of a hectic fortnight with Euphrasia. In ordinary summers Euphrasia in New- foundland is fully flowering in late July and early August, but the * summerless " season of 1926 was so backward that in early September the species were in the prime of flowering. In the subalpine gravels of Lark Mountain the species was E. Williamsti (the Newfoundland var. vestita Fern. & Wieg.), the dwarf species of the alpine area of the White Mountains with chocolate-purple corollas, known in its typical glabrous form also from the Shickshock Mts. of Gaspé and from headlands along the Straits of Belle Isle, and in the pubescent var. vestita on alpine slopes and exposed crests of western and northern Newfoundland and adjacent Quebec Labrador. We wanted to explore the bare montane islands at the entrance to the Bay of Islands. The strong winds, however, made landing on the highest of the outermost and, consequently, the most inviting (Weebald or Guernsey, 1053 feet high), impossible; but we suceecded in making French or Tweed Island (702 feet) and, with the greatest ease, the inner and sheltered low islands (Wood's, Woody, Seal's 1 RHopona, xxiii. 288 (1922). ? RHODORA, xiii. 133 (1911). 3 RHODORA, xxviii. 56 (1926). 4 Ruopona, xxxiii. 37 (1931); characteristic portions of the Newfoundland table- land are shown in Ruopora, xiii. t. 57 and xxviii. t. 154. 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora ri Nest and Governor). As just implied, sea-level on the outer coast is often more “alpine” than the summit-tablelands. Consequently, it was gratifying but not at all surprising to find the ledges (trap) and lower gravelly slopes of French Island carpeted by many species which occur north to latitudes 74°-85° in Greenland or Ellesmereland and which, in latitude 49°, we should expect to find only on the highest mountains: such species as Festuca vivipara (L.) Sm., Luzula spicata, Silene acaulis var. exscapa (All. DC. (coming south from lat. 83°), Draba rupestris R. Br., and Saxifraga aizoides and S. oppositifolia Map 1. American Range of SAXIFRAGA OPPOSITIFOLIA. (extending south from lat. 85°, Map 1). The arctic and subarctic Artemisia borealis Pall. was here, but with extraordinarily coarse leaf-segments, var. latisecta Fern., RHODORA, xxix. 93 (1927); and Euphrasia added its quota of puzzles. The endemic goldenrod of western Newfoundland, Solidago hispida var. arnoglossa Fern., Ruopora, xvii. 2 (1915), characterized by its very large narrowly obovate cauline leaves, was here well developed and so unlike the common small-leaved typical form of the species that in its extreme 8 Rhodora [JANUARY development it seems very definite. Transitional material in abun- dance, however, found both here and in a subsequent year near Bonne Bay, constrains us to maintain it as a geographic variety rather than as a species. Another goldenrod of French Island which greatly perplexed us has the foliage of Solidago rugosa but the panicles so condensed that in the smallest specimens they form dense ovoid inflorescences scarcely 2 cm. in diameter. The plant seems to be S. rugosa “reduced to its lowest terms,” so to speak, at this bleak northern limit of the species. ‘ A =f Map 2. Range of CvPRIPEDIUM REGINAE. Other southern species on French Island which seemed absolutely out of place in close proximity to Silene acaulis and Saxifraga oppo- sitifolia (MAP 1) were Cypripedium reginae Walt.(MAP 2) and Habenaria orbiculata (MAP 9). The Showy Lady’s Slipper had found a protecting thicket by a stream; but Habenaria orbiculata was so abundant as to be almost dominant in dry peat and gravel within a stone’s throw of the open shore. In New England and eastern Canada we had always thought of it as an orchid of the richest of old woodlands; but its choice of habitat on bleak French Island was only a breaking 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora 9 of the ice for our next station for it. In 1929 we found it vying with the arctic Scirpus cespitosus var. callosus (MAP 10) for possession of a sphagnous pocket on the high tableland of Lookout Mountain at Bonne Bay. Yet some critics complain that habitats are not correctly stated in our manuals! If we only could have got a day on Weebald Island, who can say what transgressions we might have found? The inner and lower islands were less dramatic. Woody Island has some good sandstone ledges along shore; but Wood’s Island, inhabited and severely burned, is botanically hopeless, and the other two visited were so slightly explored by us that we found nothing specially notable. The halophytic flora on the sandstone cliffs of Woody Island is particularly fine: all the ordinary halophytes of this region, with various doubtful Chenopods and Polygonums; Euphrasia purpurea Reeks amazingly fleshy or succulent; Cochlearia cyclocarpa Blake, a biennial, with rosettes of rounded succulent leaves, tasting like a blend of water-cress and horseradish; and the broad-leaved Plantago juncoides var. laurentiana Fern? in typical development. Cornus suecica, frequent enough along the coast and on the mountains, was here particularly beautiful; and the higher rocks supported good colonies of Potentilla pectinata Raf., a species known in Newfoundland from only a few stations, all on the West Coast. The north-facing wall of the eastern serpentine half of Blomidon drips in many places with moisture from the packed snow and ice of its upper slopes; consequently its flora,’ although limited in number of species, is a rich one for serpentine country (silicate of magnesium, therefore toxic to most plants); and, since the high ridge on the north side of North Arm is also serpentine, and very conspicuous from in- coming and out-going boats, we had great hopes of some good things there. So, as a last trip, on a cold and windy day, Long and Fogg, with Pennell and one of the Sheppard boys, crossed in a motor boat to the North Arm. In our optimism we had overlooked one import- ant point: the cold north side of Blomidon faces north and is bathed by melting snows through much of the summer; the hot serpentine slope north of the North Arm faces south and is arid and almost without vegetation. To Long and Fogg the arduous climb over 1 Blake, Ruopora, xvi. 135 (1914). ? Ruovora, xxvii. 102, t. 150, fig. 5 (1925). 3 See Fernald, Ruopvora, xiii. 118, 132 (1911). 10 Rhodora l [JANUARY arid blocks of serpentine seemed to have few rewards, for nowhere did they find continuous carpets of vegetation, merely scattered plants of a few inconspicuous species. Nevertheless, they got several of the most localized and interesting species of the serpentines of western Newfoundland and thus added an intermediate station for them between Blomidon at the south and The Tableland of Bonne Bay at the north. Adiantum pedatum var. aleuticum Rupr. was there, of course, as on all the extensive serpentine areas of Newfound- land and Quebec, on the North Arm the most stiffly erect extreme. Rhododendron lapponicum was characteristic. In Newfoundland and Gaspé it grows profusely on serpentine barrens as well as on dry limestones; but in neither region have we ever found it on granite or quartzite, although further south, on Katahdin and on Washington, it is on reputedly granitic rock and it seems to be common on the granites and gneisses of Labrador. The failure in the best Rhodo- dendron gardens to make R. lapponicum thrive might, perhaps, be averted by giving it a bed of broken serpentine or of magnesian lime- stone, rather than the usual peat and sand of conventional Rhodo- dendron gardens. Danthonia intermedia and Conioselinum pumilum Rose, in New- foundland known only on serpentine, were brought back; and Long and Fogg had the two prostrate willows, already known from Blomi- don, Salix cordifolia var. Macounii (Rydb.) Schneider and S. an- glorum var. kophophylla Schneider. The junior member of the party, facetiously inclined to translate the technical names into the so- called * English names" of some of our handbooks, rendered the last “The Cough-loving Willow of the Angles" and suggested that we each carry a bit as a charm against colds. Three of the distinctive Caryophylls of Newfoundland or of Newfoundland and Gaspé were there, as on all the serpentine mountains yet explored in western Newfoundland: Arenaria marcescens Fern.,! A. cylindrocarpa Fern.’ and Cerastium terrae-novae Fern. & Wieg.* All three are so interesting and so highly localized that it seems desirable to publish good il- lustrations of them. Arenaria marcescens (PLATE 255) forms broad mats on the driest of serpentine gravel in the Long Range of New- foundland and on the great tableland of Mt. Albert in Gaspé. Re- lated to various arctic and subarctic species (especially 4. laricifolia L. 1 RHoponRa, xxi. 15 (1919). 2 RHODORA, Xvi. 43 (1914). 3 Fern, & Wieg. Ruopona, xxii. 176 (1920). 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora 11 and A. arctica Stev.), A. marcescens is nearer related to A. obtusiloba (Rydb.) Fern. (Alsinopsis obtusiloba Rydb.) of the Rocky Mountains. Arenaria cylindrocarpa was long confused with the European A. ciliata L. and A. norvegica Gunn. (A. ciliata var. norvegica (Gunn.) Hartm., A. ciliata var. humifusa Hartm.). Several characters sep- arate A. cylindrocarpa from both European species but Ostenfeld and some other European students have maintained that it is not specifically separable. Small but characteristic specimens of A. cylindrocarpa and of A. norvegica (A. ciliata, with strongly ciliate leaves, is more remote) are, therefore, shown (PLATE 256) with suffi- cient details to make their distinctness evident. Cerastium terrae-novae (PLATE 257), known only from the western Newfoundland serpentines, is geographically very remote from its close relatives. In its large seeds it is somewhat like C. Earlei Rydb. of the Rocky Mts., but in the loose testa of the seed (very fragile and freely breaking away) it is nearer the European C. latifolium L. For purposes of illustration a very small plant has been selected; when well developed, C. terrae-novae may form fuscous-green or purplish mats up to 3 or 4 dm. across. On this hopelessly barren ridge by the North Arm Pinus Strobus struggled against adversity, forming prostrate carpets 2 to 3 meters (6-10 feet) across and only 5-8 dm. (11% to 215 feet) high, but heavily loaded with cones, P. Strobus forma prostrata (Mast.) Fern. & Weath- erby, Rnopona, xxxiv. 168 (1932), a far ery from the great White Pines of early New England days with trunks “seven feet eight inches in diameter” “and frequently 250 feet in height." In 1921 Mackenzie & Griscom found forma prostrata on Blomidon. Even the erect trees of P. Strobus in Newfoundland depart in some characters from the better developed trees on the continent, having very nodulose branchlets and short leaves, the latter not infrequently in 3's as well as in the conventional 5’s. These modifications are apparently confined to the northeastern and rather unfavorable limits of the species. The strong winds making it impossible to land on the outer islands or to reach Chimney Cove (Waghorne's station for Erysimum co- arctatum Fern. and other very rare species) or Wild Cove, with “the beach . . . broken white coral" (Nfd. and Lab. Pilot), where Waghorne had found the North Pacific Arenaria peploides, var. maxima Fern. and the remarkable and never rediscovered Salix 12 Rhodora [JANUARY Bebbiana, var. projecta (Fern.) Schneider, it was obvious that the Serpentine and the Lewis Hills were not to be reached this season. So, regretting to abandon them and to leave our hospitable home with the Sheppard family, we moved on to Port aux Basques, thence by the “Portia” to Burgeo. Whereas Wisconsin glaciation in westernmost Newfoundland failed to denude the tablelands and often left the low forelands with their ancient blankets of deeply rotted rock, Burgeo and the region west- ward to the eastern base of the Long Range seems to have been scraped clean (PLATE 233). The granitic hills are quite denuded of rotted residual mantle, scratched and gouged as if heavy mattocks and picks had been used on them only yesterday, and littered with great unweathered and obviously transported boulders (PLATE 233). Here we got few of the localized endemics. The tiny Betula Mi- chauxii Spach, Newfoundland and Labrador representative of the Old World B. nana L., but with unlobed bracts or scales, abounded, as it does in practically all acid peat on the Island; Empetrum Eamesit Fern. & Wieg., RockBERRY, with its beautiful coral-pink berries, likewise throughout the Island, was on all dry ledges, and the ubiq- uitous Agrostis scabra Willd. (A. hyemalis of most recent authors, not Cornucopiae hyemalis Walt.) was everywhere, but chiefly in the extreme with very large spikelets which occurs throughout Newfoundland (to be described in Part III). The dry peat of the granitic crests, just as at Port aux Basques and generally eastward to the Avalon Peninsula, was carpeted with Festuca capillata Lam., the typical European plant, here certainly indigenous. Damp mossy pockets were the home of the endemic of southern N ewfound- land, Epilobium Pylaieanum Fern.! (PLATE 259), distinguished from the many forms of E. palustre by its very short oblong leaves, the oblong and round-tipped calyx-lobes and the unusually long beak of the seed. The original collections, from various stations from Cape Race to Cape Ray, were mostly unbranched, but at Burgeo and westward as far as we went (to the Great Barachois) it was often bushy-branched. We spent one day between Burgeo and Sand Bank to the west, another about Great Barachois and following up Grandy Brook. In general, the flora was rather uninteresting, though the tedium was occasionally relieved by the finding of some species local on the Island: 1 RHODORA, xxvii. 33 (1925). 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora — 13 Elatine minima (Nutt.) Fisch. & Meyer, either rare or generally overlooked; Oryzopsis canadensis (Poir.) Torr., which we had recently been collecting on Lark Mt.; Carex hormathodes Fern., already locally known in both western and eastern Newfoundland; and Polygonum allocarpum Blake, for which the Newfoundland voucher had been unsatisfactory. The always surprising Schizaea, Bartonia and Xyris were there, as probably everywhere in southern Newfoundland; but when we finally had to leave for home we felt that we had done our duty by the severely glaciated granitic coast and that the next botanizing trip could rightfully be confined to the always repaying West Coast. Planning for the next trip, in the summer of 1929, we laid out a very beautiful schedule which we hoped to carry through with aid I had re- ceived from the Milton Fund for Research at Harvard. Our optimistic programme closely followed, with amazing and unreasoning credulity, the announced sailings of the local steamers, especially the “Sagona,”’ plying weekly (leaving Humbermo::th on Wednesdays) between Bay of Islands and Battle Harbor (Labrador). We were to begin with a day or two at Old Port au Choix, near where Bachelot de la Pylaie, more than a century ago, had spent eight days, and close to Pointe Riche which Wiegand had visited in 1910; consequently, worked out. Wiegand, however, got a foliage-specimen of a very strange willow which Schneider and I had independently considered an undescribed species, but good material was needed. A day or two at Old Port au Choix would suffice; then a trip over to St. John’s Island would give an opportunity to secure better material of a “red-seeded” Taraxacum, secured over-ripe in 1925. Then Trout River was in the schedule, with its spectacular mountains, and a long trip to the Lewis Hills, to be reached via Port au Port. The railroad did its part and we kept up to schedule as far as Bay of Islands; but from the day of our arrival to the day of final sailing toward home in September the announced schedule remained abashed in the depth of a pocket-book and the only date actually kept was that of Fogg’s departure some days before Long and I were ready to leave. Reaching the Bay of Islands by train, exactly on schedule, near noon of Wednesday, July 10th, with abundant time to make the “Sagona”’ at 5 p. m., we learned, to our dismay, that, true to form, she was off 1 Blake, Ruopora, xix. 234 (1917). 14 Rhodora [JANUARY schedule. She had sailed late on the last trip north and “Heaven knew when she would be back." At last account she was taking on halibut on “the Labrador” and this was slow work, each dripping and slippery box weighing 200 Ibs. and the contract calling for 1600 boxes to be aboard before she could start south! One commerical salesman of great experience advised us: “Next time wire to Battle Harbor and learn when she will sail south from there. When she has started south, you leave New York for Humbermouth and you will make her all right." No one knew when the “Sagona” would come in nor would they know until she had reached Rocky Harbor at Bonne Bay, only a few hours away. We were living at Davis's at Curling, our trunks and duffle bags were all at the steamship's terminal some miles away, at Humbermouth; but, by making several trips to the latter hotel-less point, we gradually lugged away much of our collecting material and settled down to work in the loft of the steamship company's wharf at Curling, where the agent, Mr. Frank Roach, did everything possible to facilitate our work and to keep us from regretting the loss of valuable time. It was actually a full week before the “Sagona” came in with her heavy cargo of once iced halibut, to be re-iced at Curling, shipped to North Sydney and there re-iced, thence going by train to Boston, New York, Buffalo and Detroit to supply the markets with “fresh” halibut. But our wait was a comparatively short one; a few miles away, as unconscious of our presence in the neighborhood as we of theirs, Mr. and Mrs. Frank Morris, the "Orchid enthusiasts," were spending 10 days at desolate * boom-town"' Corner Brook, also awaiting the *Sagona!" We were in perplexity. The shores of Bay of Islands had been “worked to death" and we dared not go beyond easy reach of the evasive “Sagona.” The first afternoon we strolled, by way of much- botanized Mt. Moriah, along the railroad as far as Morley's Pond. The latter area had never been much visited; consequently, we were able to secure two species not previously known in the region: Equise- tum pratense, abundant in the thicket, the first Newfoundland station south of St. John Bay; and Potamogeton praclongus, the abundant winter-buds of the preceding season swashing at the margin of the pond. We had gone especially to secure good material of Najas flexilis, seen by Wiegand and me in or near Morley's Pond in 1910, before our collecting equipment of that year had arrived, and left to be collected later. The wind was too strong for us to see it in 1933] Fernald,—Recent Discoveries in the Newfoundland Flora 15 1929 and the vouchers still await collection. "The springy thickets near the base of Mt. Moriah were white with “Mayflower,” Car- damine pratensis var. palustris Wimm. & Grab., another addition to our list from Bay of Islands; and, in the pastured clearings about Curling and eastward to Crow’s Gulch, the English Daisy, Bellis perennis, was an abundant weed, a plant frequent enough in gardens but never before in our experience a truly naturalized plant. Looking from various points on Humber Arm one sees a conspicuous white hill a few miles up the Humber on the north side. I had often viewed it from a distance and had always mentally dismissed it as a badly burned granite or quartzite hill of no botanical interest. But, in desperation for something to occupy us, we decided to go there, for, at any rate, it would be wild and some miles from civilization, surely better than over-botanized Curling and shabby and hustling Corner Brook. So on July 12, Mr. Roach assuring us that the “Sagona” would not be in, he took us by motor boat up river to our hill, Hannah’s Head according to established local nomenclature, but Mt. Patricia on modern English-made maps, imposing and rising perhaps 1200 feet above the river, one of the striking features of the ‘amous Humber Gorge. Landing on the wooded ledges, we at once saw the typical cal- ciphiles of the region; Hannah’s Head was limestone and sure to be interesting! The wooded glades were, of course, full of the ordi- nary plants of limy spruce woods; but, mingled with them here or in the springy openings on the opposite bank of the Humber (between Marble Mt. and Humbermouth), which we visited on two other days, and appearing quite native, were five European plants, two of which, in 1910, Wiegand and I had supposed to be introduced weeds. On the lower Humber, however, they are not aggressive and weedlike but occur with the strictly American and conservative plants of springy glades or openings; nor do they follow the railroad and mingle with the abundant introduced weeds a few miles away in the freight-yards of Humbermouth and Corner Brook. Linum ca- tharticum abounds on the open springy banks and runs far up the slope of Hannah’s Head in the limestone crevices; Lathyrus pratensis, superb in its woodland setting, with rich yellow flowers, extends high up a springy slope opposite Hannah’s Head; Cirsium palustre, tall and unmistakable, with deep crimson-purple heads in dense glomerules, shares the swamps with the endemic American C. muticum. 16 Rhodora [JANUARY Springy banks and margins of rills coming down the steep slopes on the south side of the river are bordered by a Cardamine, differing at once from the ubiquitous C. pensylvanica in its petiolulate rounded leaflets: C. flexuosa With., a beatiful European species new to North America. Along the river at the foot of Hannah’s Head, on the ledges where we landed, the European Scrophularia nodosa L. grew from the crevices and, higher up, above the wooded base of the hill, it grew in many rock-crevices. This was good enough! (To be continued) ASTER PANICULATUS AND SOME OF ITS RELATIVES! K. M. WIEGAND In a recent paper in this journal the writer? presented the results of some studies relating to Aster lateriflorus and its allies. The present paper is intended to record further studies of the white asters, par- ticularly of those species centering around A. paniculatus Lam. In general this group differs from A. lateriflorus in the more paniculate, generally non-secund type of inflorescence, more scabrous-ciliate and more rigid rameal leaves, and the usually firmer leaves of the stem. One species of the previous paper, A. ontarionis, seems to lie between A. lateriflorus and the A. paniculatus group, since, as in the latter species, the heads are scarcely at all racemose while at the same time it has softer rameal leaves and deeper corolla-lobes, thus suggesting A. lateriflorus. Likewise, another species, A. saxatilis, lies somewhat between A. paniculatus and A. vimineus. A. praealtus of the group now under consideration often has distinctly racemose but not secund heads. A. paniculatus and its relatives have given endless trouble to bota- nists. One has only to note the numerous names borne by specimens of the various species as they occur in herbaria. Dr. Gray was greatly troubled by them, and his opinion of the white asters was quoted in the previous paper.? In that paper the writer took the view that a major difficulty with the group has been the failure to recognize 1 Published with aid of a grant to RuHopoRA from the National Academy of Sciences. ? RHODORA xxx, 161 (1928). 3 See also: Proc. Amer, Acad. xvii. 163 (1882). 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 17 hybridity as an important element in the confusion. The present studies have tended greatly to strengthen the view that hybridization takes place frequently in the wild between many species of Asters, especially in the group under study; and that most herbaria contain an undue number of such specimens because collectors very generally gather only aberrant forms of these common species. Plants inter- preted as hybrids of A. paniculatus with A. lateriflorus, A. vimineus, A. dumosus, A. missouriensis, A. puniceus, A. novi-belgii, A. cordifolius, A. ericoides, A. undulatus, A. laevis, and A. praealtus have been seen. Of these, hybrids with A. puniceus and A. lateriflorus are much the most common. When these hybrids are eliminated, the remaining specimens fall into natural groups. Some of these groups are distinct and should therefore be regarded as species, while others grade into one another and are of the category of varieties. Another factor which makes the delimitation of groups difficult, even when the hybrids are removed, is the plastic nature of some of the species with regard to the environment. Changes in soil, shading, crowding, and other conditions, often give rise to individuals of quite unique appear- ance. Field studies have furnished at least a partial understanding of the limits of environmental influence. The recognition of hybrid plants in the herbarium is not always easy. If they could be grown and bred in the garden, their parentage could often be determined, and with comparative ease. Fortunately, however, the parentage does stand out clearly on some specimens. Hybrid Asters are rarely exactly intermediate in all their characters. Individual characters, however, are sometimes intermediate though rarely exactly so. More often it would seem that these characters do not blend but behave as units somewhat in Mendelian fashion, being either present or absent as dominance or pure blood dictates, the hybrids recombining in various ways the characters of the two parents. In some hybrid specimens the characters are nearly all of one parent so that only the trained specialist in the group will detect the slight evidence of the inheritance of some one or two characters from the other parent. Continued reviewing of the material is often necessary before all the hybrid specimens in a collection are rightly placed. The work of A. S. Pease! on A. tardiflorus is a good example of the detail to be considered in each case, though now we know that in addition to the characters used by him, venation and the details of ! RHODORA xix. 98 (1917). 18 Rhodora [JANUARY floret-structure must be given careful consideration. Sometimes, however, two different sets of parents may, by the combination of their characters, give so nearly the same appearance in the offspring, that it is not possible to decide which were the true parents. There is abundant opportunity for error in the determination of the parents of hybrid herbarium specimens even with the most painstaking effort. Accurate identification of the parents of hybrid Asters can be made only when accompanied by careful field and genetical studies. In identifying hybrids of A. paniculatus and A. puniceus attention must be given to the color of stem, type of cauline hairs, length of internodes, type of branching, shape of leaf-base, character of teeth, prominence of the finer reticulum, rugose upper surface of leaf, degree of scabrosity, type and size of rameal leaves, size of heads, character of involucre as to width, texture and degree of divergence of bracts, color and length of rays, and size of the lobes of the disk- corolla. In the case of crosses between A. paniculatus and A. lateri- florus, the type of cauline pubescence, leaf-base and leaf-shape, scabrosity, hairiness of midrib, type of branching of the plant, race- mose heads, size of heads, type of involucre, number and length of rays, and length of lobes of disk corolla are of importance. Nomen- clature in this group of Asters is in a very unsatisfactory state. It is not unusual in herbaria to find specimens of a single form bearing as many as five different names. Some of this confusion is due to synon- omy, and some to a poor understanding of the taxonomy of the group. Even the monographer, however, is in difficulty. Many names pro- posed by Lamarck, Aiton, Willdenow, Nees von Esenbeck, and others, were based largely on plants long under cultivation in European gardens. Exact records of the origin of this cultivated material were for the most part lost, and the plants themselves seem to have changed in character through variation or hybridity during their long period of cultivation so as to be no longer identifiable with any form in the wild state. It seems necessary, therefore, to ignore many of these old names as unidentifiable. Specimens grown in European gardens under some of the names proposed by these authors were obtained by Dr. Gray many years ago, some of them collected even as early as 1820 or 1830, but for the most part they are unlike any strains now known in America. 'The writer has had little opportunity to study types abroad, and the nomenclature here used must be considered as | See Gray: Proc. Amer. Acad. xvii. 163 (1882). 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 19 in some cases provisional. The interpretation of Dr. Gray, who saw some of the types, has been given weight wherever possible. The study of this group of Asters as it occurs in the far west has not been as thorough, and the material seen has not been as complete as in the case of the eastern forms. In general, the present group is distinguished in the west from other species which may resemble it by the pubescent lines on the stems and branches, and generally paniculate habit. The material forming the basis of this study is that in the Gray Her- barium and the herbarium of Cornell University. A part of the material in the New England Botanical Club herbarium has also been studied, and the material in the herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden and the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences has been superficially examined. About 1300 measurements were made of involucre, ray-flowers, disk-flowers and other organs. It was found in the course of this work, as in the study of A. lateriflorus, that many of these measurements are of material aid in delineating groups, and especially in detecting hybrids. They are useful also in the determina- tion of the parents of these crosses. The abundant overlapping of the measurements within such groups as A. paniculatus and A praealtus has greatly strengthened the opinion that the varieties of these species treated below are really varieties and not species. KEY TO THE SPECIES AND VARIETIES STUDIED a. Veinlets forming a conspicuous reticulum of fine nearly iso- diametric areolae; lateral primary veins usually wanting: leaves subcoriaceous, with slightly revolute margins; ram- eal leaves spreading in most varieties: involucral bracts firm at base, often with loose spreading tips: spread of rays (15) 18-27 mm.: lobes of disk-corollas short, 17 to 25 per cent of the whole length of the limb.! b. Involucral bracts ae imbricated, the is ‘commonly not plainly deltoid..... c. Leaves glabrous Du glabrous or seabrous-puberu- lent above..... d. d. Rameal leaves linear or linear-lanceolate or narrowly elliptic-lanceolate, very acute..... e. e. Cauline and rameal leaves lanceolate to narrowly elliptic-lanceolate, the primary rameal about 6-10 times as long as brod.: segue esses... . A. praealtus. e. Cauline and rameal leaves linear or nearly so, the primary rameal about 11 times as long as broad. Var. angustior. _ 1 The disk-corollas consist of tube and limb. The latter is composed of throat and lobes. 20 Rhodora [JANUARY d. Rameal leaves, at least the ultimate, broadly elliptic- lanceolate or oval, often obtuse................. Var. subasper. c. Leaves puberulent or scabrous on both surfaces: stems more puberulent..........0000 nn Var. nebraskensis. b. Involueral bracts conspicuously imbricated in 3 to 6 series of different lengths..... f. f. Heads not racemose, rather scattered: rameal leaves lin- ear-lanceolate, divaricate: involucral bracts in 3-4 "U.C inc ca Gece cece reece cere enedesdons teweigg as Var. tericola. f. Heads more crowded, usually more or less racemose on the branches: rameal leaves short, about 1 em. long, linear-oblong, crowded, more ascending: involucral bracts in 4-6 series... esee Var. imbricatior. a. Veinlets not so evident or, if evident, with more irregular and more oblong areolae: leaves more succulent or membran- ous; the rameal usually flat, ascending or spreading: involu- cral bracts scarcely firm, sometimes thick, usually mem- branous, the tips rarely spreading..... g. g. Plant paniculate, often bushy, up to 2 m. high: in- voluere of rather narrow and thin or succulent bracts: upper leaves little or much reduced; cauline leaves scarcely or but slightly clasping, the midrib single or nearly so (see no. 2)..... h. h. Heads of medium size: involucre (4) 4.5-8 mm. high: spread of rays 12-25 mm..... i. i. Corali iobes 19 to 36 per cent. of whole length of limb: involucral bracts subequal and the outer often herbaceous and loose or spreading, rarely much imbricated: leaves rather firm, at least the upper not narrowed at base: veins, except midrib, obscure... .. j. j. Plant bushy, paniculate: heads numerous: in- volucre 5.5-7.5 mm. high: ray-corollas 8-12 mm. long: leaves linear or narrowly lanceo- late; the rameal much reduced, scarcely or but slightly clasping................. 2. A. coerulescens j. Plant less bushy and more corymbose-panicu- late: heads somewhat larger and fuller: in- voluere 7-8 mm. high: ray-corollas 13-16 mm. long: leaves slightly broader; the rameal little reduced, more clasping............. Var. Wootonii. i. Corolla-lobes 30 to 45 per cent. of the length of the limb: involueral bracts unequal and imbri- cated: leaves less firm and often more veiny, nearly all narrowed at base.... . k. k. Leaves linear or nearly so, 12 times as long as broad or longer... n... nauna aaa 3. A. paniculatus. k. Leaves lanceolate, less than 12 times as long as | t AROE O S E Var. simplex. h. Heads smaller: involucre 3.3-4.5 mm. high (rarely 5 mm. in no. 4): spread of rays 10-16 mm.: lobes of disk-corollas 30 to 45 per cent. of length of limbo... i l. Heads loosely panieulate, rather few: rameal leaves soft, scarcely sharp-pointed: plant small for the group, 1.5-6 dm. high: leaves 3-10 em. long, rather soft. usually entire: north- eastern... ... ish 4. A. saxatilis. 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 21 l. Heads subracemose on the branches, very numer- ous on well developed plants: rameal leaves very numerous, rather firm and sharp-pointed: plant coarser, up to 1.5 m. high: leaves firmer, often 15 em. long, often serrate: central- WEBLEIN: Seats) ee ee Rte Sec oe ee ee 5. A. interior. g. Plant with a rather small subcorymbose panicle, rarely over 8 dm. high: involucre of firmer and often broader, more imbricated bracts often with pale midribs: upper leaves little reduced, generally clasping; cauline leaves rather thick, slightly clasp- ing, pale, often with whitish veins, midrib usually doubly or triply nerved: corolla-lobes 18 to 28 per Cent. or length or limb. 3b ee ee 6. A. laetevirens. 1. A. PRAEALTUS Poir. Encyc. Suppl. i. 493 (1810). A. salicifolius Ait. Hort. Kew iii. 203 (1789) not Lam.?; Gray Synopt. Fl. N. A. 1?. 188 (1884) and Rob. & Fern. in Gray, Man. ed. 7: 812 (1908), in part the vars.; Britton & Brown Ill. Fl. N. S. and Can. iii. 377 (1898), in part. A. rigidulus Desf. Cat. 122 (1815). A. obliquus Nees, Gen. et Sp. Aster, 76 (1833). A. carneus T. & G. Fl. N. A. ii. 133 (1841), in part at least; Gray, Man. eds. 1 to 5 but doubtfully Nees, Synop. Ast. 27 (1818) and Gen. et Sp. Ast. 96 (1833). A. hesperius Gray, Synopt. Fl. 1?. 192 (1884), in small part.—Stems 4-18 dm. high, rarely higher, glabrous below, pubescent in lines above, or the pubescence almost completely encircling the stem, often brownish or purplish, densely and paniculately branched in the upper part; branches ascending or spreading, very leafy: leaves subcoriaceous, slightly revolute, glossy, smooth, scabrous or scabrous-puberulent above and usually rugose, glabrous beneath; margins entire, scabrous; veinlets conspicuously reticulated especially beneath; primary veins from the simple midrib not evident except in the largest leaves; areolae of the reticulum as wide as long; cauline leaves lanceolate or elliptic-lanceolate, very acute, mostly 7-13 cm. long and 8-18 mm. wide; primary rameal leaves narrowly lanceolate, very acute, 2-4.5 (6) em. long, 6 to 10 times as long as wide; ultimate rameal leaves similar but smaller: heads of medium size (disk 6-10 mm. broad), numerous, racemose toward ends of branches, forming a large broad panicle; the short peduncles irregularly foliose-bracted: involucre 5-7 mm. high; bracts firm, in 3-4 successively shorter series, none normally foliaceous but sometimes with loose tips, oblong-lanceolate or linear-lanceolate, 0.6-1 mm. wide, very acute, glabrous or sparingly erose-ciliate, pale at margin and base, the slender green midrib narrowly rhombic- dilated above: rays 20-35; the corollas 6-15 mm. long, 0.8-1.6 mm. wide, bluish-purple, rarely white: disk-corollas narrowly funnel-form or tubular; the erect or ascending lobes very short (0.5-0.9 mm. long), only 17 to 25 per cent of the length of the whole limb: pappus-hairs 40-60, each 4.5-7 mm. long: achenes about 2 mm. long, more or less hairy.—Low ground: Kentucky, Ohio and Michigan to Wisconsin (?), Kansas, Arkansas, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and northern Mexico; 22 Rhodora [JANUARY apparently fairly common in Illinois and adjacent states. Some specimens examined: Kentucky: Short (2 specimens). Onto: Riddell, also Sullivant (T. & G. specimens). Micnican: Detroit, 1900, O. A. Farwell, no. 871. IwprANa: Wells County, 1913, C. C. Deam, no. 14145. IruriNors: J. Wolf, nos. 175, 188, 189, also E. Hall; Carlinville, 1890, W. E. Andrews, no. 16; Ringwood, 1862, Vasey; Sidney, 1914, A. S. Pease, no. 16335; Larchmound, 1914, AK. Ridgway, no. 69; Fountaindale, 1872, M. S. Bebb; Peoria, 1904, 1906, F. E. McDonald. Iowa: Ames, 1877, J. C. Arthur. Missovnr: St. Louis, 1832, Drum- mond; Dodson, 1906, B. F. Bush, no. 4151; Jackson County, 1893, Bush, no. 159. Arkansas: F. L. Harvey, no. 29. Kansas: Atchison County, 1895, A. S. Hitchcock, no. 989. OKLAHOMA: Tulsa, 1913, G. W. Stevens, no. 2977; Fisher, 1913, Stevens, no. 2966. "TExas: Dallas, 1874, J. Reverchon; Fredericksburg, 1850, G. Thurber, no. 61. Mexico: near Chihuahua, 1885, C. G. Pringle, no. 288 in part, but involucre peculiar. New Mexico ? 1851, C. Wright. Arizona: near Ft. Huachuca, 1882, Lemmon, no. 2906 (not quite typical, labelled “ Aster hesperius n. sp." by Gray); Wilgus Ranch, Chiricahua Mts., 1907, J. C. Blumer, no. 1774; Barbacamori, 1851, C. Wright, no. 1159 (possibly a hybrid; labelled “A hesperius n. sp." by Gray). One specimen is from Stony Brook, Jamaica Plain, MassACHUSETTS (1887, E. & C. E. Faxon, no. 21), but this may have been introduced there, as also may have been specimens labelled “Georgia, P. V. LeRoy” and “ Byram, N. J., H. L. Fisher." The name adopted for this species by Torrey & Gray was A. carneus Nees. This name was used in the various editions of Gray's Manual up to and including the fifth, and was the one employed in Wood's Class-Book of Botany. In the Synoptical Flora, Dr. Gray substituted the name A. salicifolius Ait. (Lam.?) since which time this has been the accepted name. Lamarck’s A. salicifolius is, how- ever, practically unidentifiable. Dr. Gray in his studies of types abroad found no specimen so named by Lamarck and Prof. Lecomte has stated to the writer that apparently no type specimen exists in the Lamarck herbarium. The original description does not strongly suggest the present species. The leaves are described as “serrates,— glabres et bordes de dents aigues un peu distants," while those of the species in question are entire or nearly so. It would seem desirable to drop the Lamarckian name as impossible of definition. In 1789 Aiton proposed an 4. salicifolius independently. An excellent photograph of the type specimen in this case has been kindly supplied the writer by Mr. Ramsbottom and it is clearly a photograph of the present species, an interpretation supported by a few florets from the type which show the short corolla-lobes and long throat characteristic of this species. 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 23 The International Congress at Cambridge in 1930 voted to reject homonyms with the sentiment in favor of such rejection even if the first used name is simply undefinable. It would seem best therefore to give up the name A. salicifolius entirely. In 1810 Poiret proposed the name A. pracaltus, basing it entirely on Aiton's 4. salicifolius, it being essentially a renaming of that species. 'This name therefore is referable unquestionably to our plant. How- ever, several names were proposed before Poiret's for plants of this general group of Asters. A study of these names seems to indicate that none clearly apply to the present species. These names doubtfully relating to it may be briefly discussed: A. salignus Willd. (Sp. PI. iii. 2040, 1804), as now occurring in Europe, resembles 4. praealtus superficially and has short corolla-lobes, but it has larger heads, looser involucre, subdentate leaves, and much coarser vein-reticulations. In general character the leaves are more like those of the A. puniceus group. A. bellidiflorus Willd. (Enum. Hort. Berol. 886, 1809) has been generally referred to A. paniculatus, but some of the old European garden specimens in the Gray Herbarium are nearly 4. praealtus. The mention of subclasping leaves and loose involucre suggests A. salignus, from which Nees says Willdenow differentiated it, or A. puniceus, and not A. paniculatus (rays white) nor scarcely A. praealtus. It was very likely a garden hybrid. A. eminens Willd. (Enum. Hort. Berol. 886, 1809) was referred by Dr. Gray in his study of types to A. salicifolius and in the Synoptical Flora to A. salicifolius or A. paniculatus. Nees, however, made it a synonym of A. junceus Ait. and A. longifolius Lam. In the original description the involucre is described as loose, which would scarcely apply to A. salicifolius or A. paniculatus but the height given is five feet which is scarcely if ever attained by A. junceus or A. longifolius. The subserrate leaves and 1-flowered branches are not characters of A. salicifolius. This plant also was most probably a garden hybrid. In recent years there has been great confusion in the application of the name A. salicifolius (praealtus) to herbarium specimens, and the extension of the range to the east by many authors has been largely based on specimens of A. paniculatus var. simplex incorrectly named. A. praealtus may be readily distinguished from A. paniculatus, however, by the shallow corolla-lobes and thicker more noticeably and more finely reticulated leaves. Just how A. praealtus came into European gardens so early (1760 24 Rhodora [JANUARY by P. Miller according to Aiton, probably earlier) is not clear. No form of this species grows near the Atlantic seaboard except in the Boston and New Orleans regions. The European specimens do not greatly resemble the var. angustior, the only form that occurs near Boston. French missionaries, however, may have brought back plants from the interior. Var. angustior, var. nov., foliis longioribus et angustioribus, lineari- bus vel lineari-lanceolatis, 11-plo longioribus quam latis. Leaves longer and narrower than in the typical form of the species, linear or linear-lanceolate, about 11 times as long as broad, the long narrow usually spreading rameal leaves particularly striking: involcure and pappus tending to be shorter than in the typical form of the species.—Rich low open woods or banks: "Oak Island," Revere Beach, near Boston, Massachusetts; also Indiana and Illinois. Speci- mens examined: MassaAcHUsETTS: "Chelsea Beach Island" [Oak Island], 1850, W. Boott (TYPE in Gray Herb.); Oak Island, Revere, 1878, H. A. Young, 1883, E. Faxon, 1894, G. G. Kennedy. INDIANA: Mt. Vernon, Posey Co., 1920, C. C. Deam, no. 33,064. ILLINOIS: Fountaindale, 1872, M. S. Bebb. The distribution of this plant is interesting. It is another western plant finding an isolated eastern station on Oak Island, Revere Beach, along with Eupatorium falcatum Michx. and several others. Lindley's A. stenophyllus? was referred to this species by Dr. Gray, and accepted by Burgess? (as a variety) for narrow-leaved forms. There is much doubt as to whether Lindley had any form of A. praealtus in mind. His description calls for a plant with spreading branches densely racemose at apex, secund heads, inner involucral bracts with colored tips and rays pale flesh-colored. It is placed in a group with A. hirsuticaulis Lindl., A. diffusus Ait., A. miser L., and A. pendulus Ait., and very likely belonged to the A. lateriflorus group. Burgess also apparently had some other plant in mind, as the range given by him was much to the southward. It seems scarcely wise therefore to employ the name, var. stenophyllus, for the present variety. Var. subasper (Lindley), comb. nov. A. subasper Lindl. in Hooker's Comp. Bot. Mag. i. 97 (1835), also in DC. Prod. v. 237 (1836). A. carneus B. subasper T. & G. Fl. N. A. n. 133 (1841), in part. A. salici- folius var. subasper A. Gray, Synopt. Fl. i.? 188 (1884) and Robinson & Fernald in Gray, Man. ed. 7, in large part.—Leaves generally more scabrous than in the typical form; rameal leaves, or at least the ulti- ! For an account of Oak Island see W. P. Rich, “Oak Island and its Flora." Ruo- DORA iv. 87 (1902). ? [n DC. Prodr. v. 242 (1830). 3 In Britton & Brown, Ill. Fl. N. S. and Can. iii. 377 (1898). 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 25 mate, broad, only 2—5 times as long as wide, merely acutish, with often truncate or somewhat clasping base: bracts of the involucre generally broader, (0.8) 1-1.5 mm. wide.—Illinois and Texas. “Foliage not shining, grows in very low ground in dense clusters, . . . bogs" (J. Wolf). Specimens examined: Inpiana: Dr. Clapp. ILutNots: Canton, 18817, J. Wolf, nos. 205 and 110, 1893 Wolf, nos. 26 and 32; Carlinville, 1892, W. E. Andrews, no. 9a. Texas: “4-6 feet high, branching above in large dense patches, on swampy places of the mountain streamlets, on the Liano," 1845-48, F. Lindheimer, nos. 456, 625 and b254. Lindley's A. subasper seems to have been based on the scabrous character, but Dr. Gray mentions also the broader rameal leaves and involucral bracts. These two latter characters seem more important and more constant than the degree of roughness. More emphasis placed on the breadth of bract has resulted in the transfer of a few specimens labelled * var. subasper" by Gray to the typical form. Var. nebraskensis (Britton), comb. nov. A. nebraskensis Britton in Britton & Brown's Ill. Fl. N. S. & Can. iii. 375 (1898).—Stem more pubescent: leaves scabrous or puberulent on both surfaces, averaging broader: heads rather large: involucral bracts strongly ciliate, often puberulent, usually broader.—Nebraska. Specimens examined: NEBRASKA: “Valley of the Lower Platte," 1842, Fremont Exped: Burwell, 1907, J. M. Bates; Ainsworth, 1897, Bates; Callaway, 1900, Bates, no. 2603; Whitman, 1893, P. A. Rydberg, no. 1724, duplicate type. 'The taxonomic status of this variety is not very clear. The Ryd- berg specimen has very broad rameal leaves and rather broad bracts as in var. subasper, while the leaves and involucral bracts of the other specimens approach those of typical A. praealtus. The foliage seems a little coarser than in A. praealtus. The involucral bracts are ap- parently a little less unequal, and possibly in fewer series, than in the typical form and var. subasper. Var. texicola, var. nov. Bracteis involucri vere imbricatis exteriori- bus seriatim brevioribus, capitulis non racemosis laxis submagnis, foliis ramorum lineari-lanceolatis divaricatis laxis. Similar in habit and foliage to the typical form but more open and diffuse: rameal leaves rather short, linear-lanceolate, spreading, not crowded: heads slightly larger and more loosely arranged, less racemose: involucral bracts more imbricated, in 3—4 successively shorter series, rather broad (about 1 mm.), with subdeltoid tips, broadly green with narrow or obsolete scarious margins.—Kansas and Texas. Specimens examined: Kansas: Univ. Campus, Lawrence, 1902, M. A. Barber, apparently this. Texas: “Under shrubs on the rocky banks of the upper Pierdenales” [Pedernales River, Gillespie Co?] 1845, F. Lind- 26 Rhodora [JANUARY heimer, no. 445; “3-5 ft. high, banks of streams," Comanche Spring, 1849, Lindheimer, nos. 186b, and 881 (TYPE in Gray Herb.); Dallas, 1880, J. Reverchon, no. 40. The heads in this variety are larger than in any other form of the species except possibly var. nebraskensis. Var. imbricatior, var. nov. Bracteis involucri valde imbricatis latis exterioribus seriatim brevioribus, capitulis plus minusve confertis racemosisque, foliis ramorum 1 cm. longis sublatis confertis. Involuere more obconie than in the last variety; bracts much imbricated in 4—6 successively shorter series, passing into the rameal leaves: heads more racemose and more crowded: rameal leaves about 1 em. long, rather broad, crowded.—Missouri to Texas. Specimens examined: Missouri: near Springfield, 1890, S. Weller. ARKANSAS: Dr. Woodhouse. Trxas: New Braunfels, 1851, F. Lindheimer, nos. 636 and 883; College Station, 1896, H. Ness. (Type in Herb. Cornell Univ.) This variety has the appearance of a hybrid of A. pracaltus and A. lateriflorus var. pendulus, but the specimens are rather uniform and extreme. The var. pendulus is apparently rare in Texas. It probably occurs in the eastern part of the state, but the writer has seen no certain specimens from there. 2. A. COERULESCENS DC. Prod. v. 235 (1836). A. salicifolius var. caerulescens Gray, Synopt. Fl. N. A. i? 188 (1884), in part atleast. A. hesperius Gray, l. c. 192 (1884), in large part. A. fluvialis Osterhout, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. xxxii. 611 (1905). A. fluviatilis Rydb. Fl. Rocky Mts. 886 (1922). A. lautus Lunell, Amer. Mid. Nat. n. 146 (1911). A. durus Lunell, l. c. ii. 148 (1911). A. lautus var. prinoides Lunell, l. c. v. 55 (1917). A. paniculatus var. polychrous Lunell, |. c. v. 55 (1917).—Stem tall, up to 1.5 m. high, much branched above in the larger plants and bushy, glabrous below, more or less striate or angled and pubescent in lines above; branches ascending or spreading: leaves linear or narrowly lanceolate, thick and obscurely veined, 6-15 cm. long, 5-15 mm. broad, very acute, tapering to a scarcely auriculate base, glabrous and smooth or sparingly scabrous above, scarcely rugose, glabrous beneath; margin entire or with a few low teeth, scabrous; midrib pale, sometimes accompanied by two indistinct parallel adjacent more slender veins, and often with a few strongly ascending branches; areolae irregular, inconspicuous, mostly longer than broad; rameal leaves much smaller, narrowly lanceolate, as- cending, slightly if at all clasping, scabrous margined, often falcate on the more diffusely branched plants: heads numerous, in a large panicle, rarely at all racemose, mostly short peduncled and rather crowded: involucre 5.5-7.5 mm. high; bracts rather thin, narrow, lanceolate or linear-lanceolate, 0.7-1.0 mm. broad, gradually acute, in 2-4 nearly equal series, or the outer sometimse shorter and more 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 27 imbricated, usually somewhat foliaceous and loose and often with slightly spreading tips, more or less ciliate-erose, otherwise usually glabrous; margins and base of the inner bracts mostly pale, the fine green midrib gradually dilated above: rays 23-34, rarely more, white or purple; the corollas rather long, (8) 10-12 mm. in length, 0.8-1.5 mm. broad: disk corollas narrowly funnelform or tubular; the erect or ascending short lobes 0.6-1.1 mm. long, 19-36 per cent of the length of the whole limb: pappus hairs 45-60, each 5-6 mm. long: achenes about 2 mm. long, hairy.—Damp soil along rivers and irrigation ditches: Wisconsin and Alberta to Central Nebraska and Wyoming (Nelson), southward through central Kansas and the mountain foothills to central Texas, northern Mexico, Arizona, Utah and southern California. Some specimens examined: ALBERTA: 1906, Macoun. Wisconsin: St. Croix Falls, C. F. Baker (probably this). Nort Dakota: Leeds, 1910-16, J. Lunell, nos. 1085, 1086, 1087, 1091. NEBRASKA: Long Pine, 1896, J. M. Bates; Red Cloud, 1909, Bates; Wood River, 1910, Bates. Kansas: Riley County, 1895, A. S. Hitchcock, no. 726. OkrAnoMa: Tishomingo, 1915, H. W. Houghton, as Stevens no. 3508. Coronapo: Platte River, 1910, A. Eastwood, no. 74; New Windsor, 1897-98, G. E. Osterhout, no. 8, 1899, Osterhout, no. 4, 5 & 7, 1905, Osterhout, no. 3188. "Texas: Berlandier, no. 510 (duplicate type of DC.); Weatherford, 1902, S. M. Tracy, no. 8133. Uram: Hurricane, 1918, W. W. Eggleston, no. 14840. ARIZONA: near Ft. Huachuca, 1882, Lemmon, no. 2905; Black River Flats, J. T. Rothrock, no. 789, not typical. CmnrmuvAHUa: Colonia Garcia, 1899, Townsend & Barber, no. 346, probably, undeveloped. CALIFORNIA: San Diego County, 1874, D. Cleveland; San Bernardino Valley, S. B. Parish, nos. 564, 572, 3818; San Jacinto Mts., 1880, Parish Brothers, no. 526; Ft. Tejon, 1864, Dr. Horn; Walker's Basin, Kern County, 1875, J. T. Rothrock, no. 283; Tehachapi, Kern County, Brandegee. The oldest name for this plant is apparently A. coerulescens DC. A duplicate of the type is in the Gray Herbarium and belongs clearly to the present species, not to A. salicifolius as stated by Dr. Gray. Judging from specimens labelled by Dr. Gray, his A. salicifolius var. caerulescens was a mixture of several forms, and apparently was not well understood. 'Two of these specimens are here referred to 4. praealtus var. texicola, one is related to 4. ericoides, and two others belong to the present species, one of these being the duplicate type. Specimens labelled “ A. hesperius n. sp." by Gray indicate that this latter species was based partly on A. praealtus and partly on specimens of A. coerulescens. The specimens cited from North Dakota in the present paper are all type specimens of the various Lunell synonyms listed above, and are all in the herbarium of the University of Minne- sota. They are not unlike the general run of specimens of this species. 28 Rhodora [JANUARY Var. Wootonii (Greene), comb. nov. A. hesperius var. Wootonii Greene, Bull. Tor. Bot. Club. xxv. 119 (1898). A. W'ooton?i Greene, Leaflets, i. 146 (1905).—Heads rather large, the involucre 7-8 mm. high, and ray corollas up to 16 mm. long: inflorescence a little more corymbose: stems less branched: rameal leaves much less reduced, broader and more clasping at base.—‘‘ Wet ground especially along streams in the Transition Zone" (Wooton & Standley): mountains of New Mexico and Arizona and possibly southern California. Specimens examined: New Mexico: Rose & Fitch, no. 15780; Mogollon Mts., 1881, H. H. Rusby, 191; White Mts., 1897, E. O. Wooton, no. 329 (duplicate of type of var. Wootonii Greene). CALIFORNIA: Tehachapi, Mrs. Brandegee, probably this; San Antonio Mts., 1917, T. M. Johnston, no. 1427, not typical; San Bernardino Mts., 1884, S. B. Parish, no. 1691, probably. The status of this variety is not clear. In the present study insuffi- cient material was at hand to give a clear picture. Its aspect some- times approaches that of A. lactevirens, but the involucre is like that of A. coerulescens. The southwestern forms of A. praealtus seem to have been mistaken for this variety at times. It probably occurs in southern California, but the specimens seen from that region are transitional to the typical form. Rydberg! has noted that Wooton’s no. 329, which represents the type collection of var. Wootonii Greene, . and Baker's no. 817, cited by Greene as typical of his A. Wootonit, are not the same. Duplicates of these numbers seen by the writer indi- cate that they are not. Wooton’s specimen is an immature rather untypical plant apparently of this variety, while Baker’s specimen seems to be a diffuse form of A. laetevirens. 3. A. PANICULATUS Lam. Encye. i. 306 (1783); Gray, Synopt. Fl. N. A. i2. 187 (1884) in part; Gray, Man. ed. 6 and 7, in large part. A. tenuifolius T. & G. Fl. N. A. ii. 132 (1841), in part at least, not L., and Gray, Man. eds. 1-5. A. tenuifolius B ramosissimus T. & G. l. c. (1841), the more divaricate-branched plants. A. tenuifolius y bellidiflorus 'T. & G. l. c., the more strict plants chiefly, doubtfully A. bellidiflorus Willd. Including A. paniculatus var. bellidiflorus Burgess in Britton & Brown, Ill. Fl. No. Sta. and Can. iii. 377 (1898) and Gray, Man. ed. 7, largely, except perhaps as to range.—Stems 5-15 dm. high, rather strict or sometimes diffuse, glabrous below, pubescent in lines above and usually with greenish striae; branches ascending or sometimes widely spreading: middle cauline leaves narrow, linear or nearly so, 8-15 cm. long, 3-12 mm. wide, 12 times as long as broad or narrower, mostly spreading, tapering to an acute apex and non- clasping base, rather firm but not coriaceous, glabrous and smooth on both surfaces or scabrous above toward the tip, not at all rugose; 1 Bull. Torr. Bot. Club xxxvii. 140 (1910). 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 29 margins usually flat, scabrous-ciliolate, more or less serrate in the larger leaves, rarely entire; primary branch-veins few, not conspicuous, the ultimate areoles irregular, mostly longer than broad, usually indistinct; rameal leaves lanceolate to nearly subulate, ascending or more rarely spreading, rather stiff, their margins scabrous-ciliolate: heads of medium size (disk 6-8 mm. broad), paniculate, rarely at all racemose and then not unilaterally disposed; involucre (4) 4.5-5.5 mm. high; bracts narrow, linear-subulate, linear, or narrowly oblong, acutish, glabrous or sparingly ciliolate, rather firm but not coriaceous with green midrib and apex, well imbricated, usually even the tips appressed: ray corollas 20-40, each 6 to 11 mm. long, white, very rarely tinged with blue or lavender: disk corollas narrowly funnel- form or tubular; lobes moderately deep, 0.7-0.9 (1.2) mm. long, 30 to 45 per cent of the length of the whole limb, usually spreading, rarely at all recurved: pappus hairs (32) 40-65 (80), each 3.6-6 mm. long: achenes narrowly obovoid, somewhat flattened, strigose, about 2 mm. long.—Meadows, low thickets and shores: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Maine, and central Quebec to Connecticut and the highlands of New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania, westward through Ontario and Ohio to Wisconsin and Missouri; common in Canada and northern New England, frequent in northern New York but rare elsewhere in the state, rare in northern Ohio and northern Illinois. A strict specimen from Missouri (Courtney, Bush, no. 1785) is apparently to be referred to this form of the species. The habit varies greatly. Forms with strict branches and rameal leaves have been segregated as var. bellidiflorus, and were so segregated in the present study during its earlier stages. A closer inspection, and a tabulation of the flowering period as determined from the labels, has seemed to show, however, that these strict plants are for the most part juvenile stages of the more divaricate and diffuse types. It may be noted incidentally that nothing in the original description of A. bellidiflorus Willd. suggests this fastigiate habit, and why the name has been applied to this form is not clear. Plants with the heads somewhat smaller than usual occur rather frequently around the Great Lakes and westward, but in most cases these are to be interpreted as hybrids, or occasionally as due to crowding or poor nutrition. This species can be distinguished from A. praealtus by the much deeper corolla-lobes, more ascending rameal leaves and non-rugose, softer, flatter, often more serrate cauline leaves with less conspicuous reticulum of the ultimate veinlets and more oblong veinlet areoles. The species seems to be largely an inhabitant of the heavier clay soils. The oldest name previously applied to any member of this species concept is A. Tradescanti of Linnaeus. There has long been doubt, however, as to the application of this name. The matter has been discussed at some length by Dr. Gray and the synonomy worked out 30 Rhodora [JANUARY by him as based on his extended study of types in the European herbaria.! Linnaeus’s publication of A. Tradescanti was based on a two line description of little diagnostic value, and references to Hortus Cliffortianus, Hortus Upsaliensis, and Morison’s Historia, the latter reference being the name-bringing citation. According to Gray, one of the two specimens in the Clifford herbarium is a small-headed form of the present species, the other being referable to A. vimineus. A specimen in the Linnean herbarium, from the Upsala garden, Gray says is the large headed A. paniculatus. A plant in the Morison herbarium, which according to Gray should probably be considered the type, is a small-headed form of the present species, and this is the form to which Dr. Gray would apply the Linnean name. A photograph of the Morison plant, taken by Professor Fernald, is in the Gray Herbarium. This photograph does not seem to match any American form unless it be a shade condition of some normally wild form. ‘The specimen may have come from shaded or crowded colonies in the garden. The heads are rather small, but are not fully devel- oped, and possibly would have been larger if they had matured. The rameal leaves are more elliptic, more lax, and less rigid than in all forms of this species, but resemble somewhat those of A. saxatilis. Indeed, the photograph suggests A. saxatilis very much in the panicle and rameal leaves, but the cauline leaves are more divaricate. There is, however, no reason to believe that the low and slender A. saxatilis was in cultivation in Europe at that early period. In the opinion of the writer, this Morison plant may very likely have been simply an undeveloped shaded individual of var. simplex, but we have no way of proving this. It may, however, have been a hybrid form of A. paniculatus with A. lateriflorus or A. vimineus. Dr. Gray applied the name to a race of small-headed, paniculate plants which he gave as ranging from “Canada to Virginia, Illinois, and Saskatchewan. Cultivated from the earliest days in European gardens.” After vain attempts during the present study to establish such a species, the writer is now of the opinion that no such race exists in the wild state in America and probably nowhere in cultivation. The older European specimens bearing this name in the Gray Herbarium are apparently hybrids of A. lateriflorus with A. paniculatus or A. pracaltus. In .America, the specimens labelled A. Tradescanti by Dr. Gray, and 1 Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. xvii. 166 (1882), and Synopt. Fl. N. A. 12. 187 (1884). 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 31 those in the New York Botanical Garden Herbarium that served as a basis for Dr. Britton’s, and in part for Mr. Burgess’s treatment in the two editions of the Illustrated Flora, may be interpreted as hybrids with A. lateriflorus, A. vimineus, A. missouriensis var. thyrsoideus, A. interior, and A. ericoides, or in a few cases as straight A. lateriflorus or straight A. vimineus, or in some cases as simply undeveloped 4. paniculatus. It seems impossible to detect a definite race among all these specimens. The mass of specimens is conspicuously marked by lack of uniformity. Because of this extremely vague and indefinite status of the name the writer believes that the best interests of tax- onomy are served by abandoning it altogether. The next oldest name is A. paniculatus Lam. The interpretation of this also is not easy. Prof. Lecomte writes that no type specimen exists in the Lamarck herbarium. Dr. Gray in his study of types says: “The proper herbarium of Lamarck at Rostock I have not been able to consult. But distinct traces of all the species, with one ex- ception [A. salicifolius], have been found at Paris," and farther on: “A common and multiform northern species, the A. Tradescanti L., as to herb. and Hort. Ups. (but not of Morison), comprising A. tenuifolius and A. simplex of Torr. and Gray, Flora, mainly, exc. syn.” From this it may be judged that he saw traces of this at Paris. In the Synoptical Flora Gray says: “Lam. Dict. i. 306 (1783, the char. not good for the involucre, but it is the A. serotinus procerior, & c., Tourn., cited by Lam.)." The original description is not very con- vincing and it is difficult to make much out of it. However, in view of Dr. Gray's rather positive statements concerning the identity of the name and the lack of further evidence as to what it might otherwise be, and in view of the long continued use of the name since Gray's time, it may well be retained for this species. Lamarck's statement that the leaves are narrowly lanceolate may be assumed to refer it to the narrow-leaved form. Previous to the Synoptical Flora and beginning with Torrey & Gray or before, the narrow-leaved variant here con- sidered the typical form was usually called A. tenuifolius L. and the broad-leaved type 4. simplex Willd. The species is highly variable in many of its organs, apparently for the most part in response to the environment, but the writer has been unable to draw any specific lines within this general A. paniculatus complex. The plants differ only in general habit, width of leaves, and other superficial and variable characters, while the essentials of floral 32 Rhodora [JANUARY and head structure remain the same. Many of these variants can often be found in the same field. Frequent intergrading specimens occur that unite the various trends in a perplexing way. The color of the rays, too, varies from pure white, the usual color, to lavender or pale blue in response apparently to some physiological or genetical disturbance about which we know little at present. Occasionally the color is due to hybridity, as shown by other characters. Hybrids are apparently common between A. paniculatus and other species as already stated. Those with A. lateriflorus and A. puniceus seem especially abundant in the east. Farther westward plants appearing to be crosses with A. pracaltus and A. missouriensis var. thyrsoideus are frequent. Less common hybrids with other species occur. Among all these variants only the broad leaved form seems to be worthy of nomenclatural recognition. This may be a true race as its range does not wholly coincide with that of typical A. paniculatus. It is here recognized as follows: ; Var. SIMPLEX (Willd.) Burgess in Britton & Brown, IIl. Fl. No. Sta. & Can. iii. 377 (1898), chiefly this, as also Robins. & Fern. in Gray, Man. ed. 7. A. simplex Willd. Enum. Hort. Berol. 887 (1809), this or A. salignus; Nees, Gen. et Sp. Aster, 91 (1833); Torr. & Gray, FI. N. A. and Gray, Man. eds. 1-5. A. paniculatus of Gray, Synopt. Fl. in part, also of Gray, Man. ed. 7 in part, and Burgess l. c. in part. A. Jacobaeus Lunell, Amer. Mid. Nat. v. 56 (1917).—Leaves broader, 10-40 mm. wide, 11 times as long as broad or wider: involucral bracts averaging slightly wider.—4 more southern and western variant: New Brunswick and southern Quebec to Virginia and West Virginia, or possibly to the mountains of North Carolina; westward to South Dakota, Nebraska and Missouri and perhaps Texas. The common and almost exclusive form in central New York, rare in Canada and northern New England. Strict individuals are more common in the northeast. Rather late flowering, from Aug. 20 to Oct. 15, chiefly in late September and early October. Second growth specimens of this variety, from cut-off or injured stems, or late flowering specimens from other causes, often have the heads more bunched in the axils of the large leaves and the involucral bracts broader. There is some doubt as to the proper varietal name for this form. Apparently no previous author has had exactly the same conception as here adopted. Burgess' conception verges toward the second growth type mentioned above. He may have included specimens of the common hybrid A. puniceus X A. paniculatus, suggested by his words “inflorescence leafy,” or this latter phrase may have reference merely to the condition found in many second growth specimens. 1933] Wiegand,—Aster paniculatus and some of its Relatives 33 Robinson & Fernald’s conception seems to have been nearly that of Burgess. The conception in Torrey & Gray’s Flora and in Nees von Essenbeck’s revision is very nearly ours. Dr. Gray in his study of types refers A. simplex Willd. to A. salignus Willd., and in the Synop- tical Flora this latter, along with A. simplea, to A. salicifolius Scholler [not A. salicifolius Ait.] which he says: “represents a form of this same species [A. paniculatus] either very early naturalized in Hungary and Germany or possibly indigenous." A. salignus, as represented by the few specimens seen by the writer, all modern specimens from various parts of Europe, does seem somewhat different from any form of A. paniculatus. Its heads are large and the rays often colored, the involucre loose, frequently of more equal bracts, and the leaves more clasping, though not strongly so. Willdenow’s original description is very good for our form except in the statement “calycibus laxe imbricatis" and in another part of the description “calyx imbri- catus, squamis lineari-subulatis adpressis inferioribus subpatulis." He may have had 4. salignus in mind or he may have had plants of the present variety. However, considering the long continued use of the name A. simplex for broad leaved forms of A. paniculatus it would seem justifiable to continue its use in that sense, since it can not be definitely shown to be something else. Several varieties of