MISSOURI
BOTANICAL GARDEN.
SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT.
ST. LOUIS, MO.:
PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES.
1895.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MISSOURI
BOTANICAL GARDEN.
President,
RUFUS J. LACKLAND.
Vice-President,
HENRY HITCHCOCK, LL.D.
JOSEPH W. BRANCH. FREDERICK W. BROCKMAN,
President of the Board of Publie
GEORGE S. DRAKE. Schools of St. Louis.*
WINFIELD S. CHAPLIN,
Chancellor of Washington Univer-
sity.*
GEORGE J. ENGELMANN, M. D.
JOHN B. JOHNSON, M. D.
JOHN GREEN, M. D.,}
DAVID F. KAIME. President of the Academy of Science
ot St. Louis.*
GEORGE A. MADILL. DANIEL 8. TUTTLE,
i *
Wiittux H. H. Parrvs. Bishop of the Diocese of Missouri.
Cyrus P. WALBRIDGE,
JAMES E. YEATMAN. Mayor of the City of St. Louis.*
A. D. CUNNINGHAM, Secretary.
* Ex officio.
1 Elected President of the Academy of Science January 7th, 1895, in place of
Henry 8. Pritchett, who had met with the Board for three years prior to that date.
PREFACE.
Under direction of the Board of Trustees, the sixth
annual report of the Missouri Botanical Garden is offered
to the public. This volume differs from those which pre-
ceded it in the omission of the section consisting of
‘‘ anniversary publications,’’ comprising the annual flower
sermon and the proceedings at the two annual banquets
instituted by Mr. Shaw, the Director’s report containing
all that it is considered necessary to state concerning these.
The fifth report was issued April 27th, 1894. Reprints
of papers from the present volume were issued in advance
of its publication as follows: —
Smith, Sagittaria and Lophotocarpus, May 24th, 1894;
Trelease, Leitneria Floridana, May 30th, 1894.
The reports of the Garden are sent regularly to scientific
institutions and journals in exchange for publications or
specimens desirable for the library and herbarium of the
Garden, and, so far as is possible, reprints of the botanical
articles which they contain are sent to botanists to whom
these papers are directly useful.
Regular agents for the sale of Garden publications are
Dr. A. E. Foote, of Philadelphia, W. Wesley & Son, of
London, and R. Friedlander & Sohn, of Berlin.
WiLuiaM TRELEASE.
St. Louis, March 1, 1895.
(3)
CONTENTS.
PAGE.
1. REPORTS FOR THE YEAR 1894:—
a. Report of the Officers of the Board ake 7
b. Sixth Annual Report of the Director. . ... . rt
2. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS :—
a. Revision of the North American Species of Sagittaria and
Lophotocarpus —
By Jared G. Smith .
. Leitneria Floridana —
By William Trelease « fg ete eee
c. Studies on the Dissemination and Leaf Reflexion of Yucca
aloifolia and other Species —
pereeroert 3. Webber... s,s sh ve wate re ee
ad, Notes and Observations on new or little known Species —
By Jared G. Smith . £
32
SAGITTARIA AND LOPHOTOCARPUS. 59
plump, 1.5 to 2 mm. long, with a very slender lateral
erect beak, margins broadly winged below the middle, sides
smooth; seed 1 mm. long, broadly obovate, striate. —
Ponds near Guerrero, Chihuahua, Mexico, Pringle, 1367,
Sept. 9, 1887. Distributed as S. graminea forma acuti-
folia. It is related to S. subulata and S. filiformis.—
Plate 15.
§ § § Integrifoliae.
* Fertile pedicels neither thickened nor recurved in fruit.
S. LANCIFOLIA ANGUSTIFOLIA (Lindl.) Griseb. Catal. Pl.
Cub. 218 (1866); Micheli, DC. Monogr. 3: 73. WS.
angustifolia Lindley, Bot. Reg. 14: pl. 1141 (1828).
Much smaller than the type in every part; blade of leaf
very narrow or absent; bracts barely 3 mm. long; sepals 3
to 4 mm.; carpels crested,— ex Micheli, 7. c. 73.— Tical-
tepec, Mex., Liebmann, July, 1841, fide Buchenau, Engler’s
Bot. Jahrb. 2: 487.
* * Fertile pedicels thickened or recurved in fruit.
S. Mexicana Steudel, Nomenclator, 491 (1841). S.
macrophylla Zucc. Abhandl. Bayr. Akad. 1832, 289 ;
Micheli, Monogr. 3: 71.—not Bunge, Mem. Say.
Etrang., 2: 137 (1831).— See above, p. 30.
Monoecious, 3 to 10 dm. high; erect, or the petioles
weak and ascending; leaf 10 to 20 cm. long, 1 to 5 cm.
wide, lanceolate, acute at the apex, entire, abruptly nar-
rowing to the petiole, or hastate with small, nearly linear,
divaricate lobes; veins free to the base; scape simple, erect,
about equaling the leaves; verticils 3 to 5, remote ; fertile
pedicels erect-spreading in flower, 5 to 7 cm. long, exceed-
ing the sterile; bracts broadly ovate, obtuse, 8 to 10 mm.
long, connate nearly to the apex; flowers ample, 3 cm.
across; stamens 21 to 30, 4 to 5 mm. long, the slender
glabrous filaments longer than the oblong sagittate anthers.
The mature achenia have not yet been collected. In
immature fruiting heads, the ovaries are broadly winged,
33
hee eed
60 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
with a long horizontal style, and an undulate dorsal crest.—
Plate 27.
Specimens examined from Mexico, collected by L. Hahn, 1869, in
Herb. Engelmann, ex Herb. A. Braun; and a fragment from the type, in
Herb. Engelmann, ex Herb. Monaco, collected by Karwinsky.
Lopuotrocarrus T. Durand, Index Gen. Phan. 627
(1888). Lophiocarpus Miquel, Ill. Fl. Arch. Ind. 1: part
2, 50 (1870), not Turcz.— Fertile flowers with stamens;
filaments hypogynous.
L. catycrnus (Engelm.) J. G. Smith, in Mem. Torr. Bot.
Club, Vol. 5: 25 (1894).— Sagittaria calycina En-
gelm. including var maxima, var media and var. fluitans
Engelm. in Torr. Bot. Mex. Bound. Surv. 212 (1858) ;
S. calycina var. spongiosa, and S. calycina var. gran-
dis Engelm. in A. Gray, Man. Ed. 5, 493, 494 (1867) ;
Lophiocarpus calycinus Micheli, in DC. Monog. Phan.
8: 61 (1881).
Weak; leaves floating or ascending, halberd shaped,
broader than long, or sagittate, hastate or entire, varying
greatly, from 2 to 20 cm. long by 1.5 to 30 cm. wide,
obtuse or acutish, the basal lobes widely divaricate, ovate,
acuminate ; scape simple, 1 to 3 dm. high, weak, at length
decumbent; bracts short, orbicular, obtuse, those at the
base of the staminate verticils often lanceolate, pointed ; fer-
tile pedicels greatly thickened, reflexed, as long as or much
longer than the more slender sterile ones ; filaments slightly
roughened; achenia obovate, 2 mm. long, narrowly winged
on both margins, a very short resin passage at the base of
the beak above, beak about } as long as the achenium, tri-
angular, horizontal. A very variable species according to
the habitat ; petioles and scapes rather spongy, as are the
phyllodia when present; phyllodia sometimes strongly
nodose.— From New Brunswick to S. Dakota and Califor-
nia, and southward.
Specimens examined from New Brunswick (Fowler, Bass R., Kent
Co., July, 1870); Maine (Swan, Kennebeck, Sept. 1859); Massachusetts
34
SAGITTARIA AND LOPHOTOCARPUS. 61
(Boott, Woburn Pond, 1863); New Jersey (Parker, Camden, Oct. 1877;
Austin, Hackensack R., Aug. 1861); Delaware (Tatnall, Wilmington,
1861); Virginia (Coville, Colonial Beach, July 1890); Michigan (Schneck,
Grand Rapids, 1880, 1881); Wisconsin (Hale, Prairie du Chien, 1861);
Illinois and Missouri, many collections, 1842 to 1893; S. Dakota (Will-
iams, 8, 5, 7 and 14, 1892); Nebraska (Williams, Greenwood, 1890);
Kansas (Hitchcock, Manhattan, 1892); Indian Terr. (Palmer, 331, False
Wichita R. 1868; Carleton, 268, Cherokee Outlet, 1891); Louisiana (Hale,
Alexandria); Texas (Wright, 679; Oct. 1849); New Mexico (Wright,
1899, 1852); California (Parish, 1136, Los Angeles Co., Oct. 1881; San-
ford, Stockton, July, 1893).
L. Guyanensis (HBK.) Micheli, Monogr. 3: 62 (1881).
Sagittaria Guyanensis HBK. Nov. Gen. Sp. 1: 250
(1815).
Leaves floating, broadly ovate, deeply cordate, 3 to 5 cm.
long by 4 to 6 cm. wide, obtuse to slightly emarginate ;
scape erect or flexuous procumbent; bracts broadly ovate,
obtuse; pedicels scarcely exceeding the bracts; filaments
somewhat glandular; achenia very numerous, flattened,
deeply notched, winged on both margins, without resin
passage, the beak scarcely surpassing the margin.— Mexico,
etc., fide Micheli, /. c. 63.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES ILLUSTRATING THE NORTH AMERI-
CAN SPECIES OF SAGITTARIA.
The figures were drawn, under the supervision of the
author, by Miss Grace E. Johnson. Nos. 3, 28, and 29, are
from living plants. No. 28 is reduced from a water color
sketch drawn under Mr. J. A. Sanford’s supervision by
Dr. Hudson of Stockton, Cal. No. 2 is from the original
plate published in the Bull. Torr. Bot. Club (1893), kindly
loaned by Dr. N. L. Britton. The remainder are from her-
barium specimens. Detail drawings, unless otherwise speci-
fied, are enlarged ten diameters.
Plate 1, 8. arifolia Nutt.—1, Plant reduced to half size; 2 and 3, lateral
view and cross section of achenium; 4 stamen; 5, plant of S. arifolia
stricta, reduced to half size.
Plate 2, S. cuneata Sheld.— Plant and upper portion of the scape,
natural size; achenium, < 30.
35
62 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
Plate 3, S. latifolia Willd. — 1, Plant reduced one-fourth; 2, portion of
a branching scape, reduced to half size; 8, 4, achenia; 5, cross-section of
achenium; 6, fruiting head, natural size; 7, stamens from the same
flower.
Plate 4, 8. latifolia, Willd., forms a and b.— 1, fertile scape, reduced
to half size; 2, sterile scape, reduced to half size; 8, achenium, form a;
4, achenium, form b, from Washington; 5, achenium, form 0, from §.
California; 6, achenium of S. Sinensis Sims, ex herb. Hooker.
Plate 5, S. latifolia form c.— 1, Plant, reduced to half size; 2, achenium;
3, cross-section of achenium; 4, seed.
Plate 6, 8. latifolia form d.—1, Plant, reduced to half size; 2,
achenium; 38, seed.
Plate 7, S. latifolia form e.—1, Plant, one-fourth natural size; 2,
achenium; 3, cross-section of achenium.
Plate 8, S. latifolia pubescens (Muhl.).— Form a: 1 , leaf, one-half size;
2, achenium; 3, stamen; 4, fruiting head, natural size; details after
Engelmann.— Form b: 5, plant, three-eighths natural size. — Form ¢: 6,
scape, natural size; 7, immature achenium; 8, stamen.
Plate 9, S. Engelmanniana. — 1, Plant, one-half size; 2, achenium; 3,
cross section of achenium; 4, pistil; 5, stamen; 6, leaf, natural size.
Plate 10, 8. longirostra (Micheli) .— Details after Engelmann. 1, plant,
one-third size; 2, leaf, one-half size; 83, achenium; 4, cross section of
achenium; 5, immature achenium from Drummond’s type collection; 6,
young fruiting head, natural size; 7, pistil; 8, stamen; 9, and 10, cross
sections of scape, below and above. Sketches, except no. 4, made from
Canby’s specimens.
Plate 11, S. longiloba Engelm.—1, Plant, one-third natural size; 2,
winter-tuber, with young plant; 8, achenium; 4, cross section of
achenium; 5, seed; 6, stamen.
Plate 12, S. Greggii.—1, Plant, one-sixth natural size; 2, leaf, one-
half natural size; 3, achenium; 4, stamen.
Plate 13, 8S. subulata (L.) Buch.— 1, Plant, natural size; 2, achenium,
lateral and 3, dorsal view; 4, stamen. 8. subulata gracillima (S. Wats.).—
5, Plant, natural size; 6, inflorescence; 7, immature achenium; 8, stamen.
Plate 14, S. subulata natans (Michx.)—1, Plant, one-half size; 2,
achenium, lateral and 3, dorsal view; 4, stamen.
Plate 15, S. demersa.— 1, Plant, one-half natural size; 2, achenium; 8,
stamen; 4, leaf, one-half natural size. S. Jiliformis.— 5, Plant, one-half
’ natural size; 6, pistil; 7, stamen; 8, bracts, « 5.
Plate 16, S. lancifolia L.—1, Plant, one-sixth natural size; 2, achenium.
S. lancifolia falcata (Pursh). —8, Part of scape, natural size; 4, ache-
nium; 5, stamen.
Plate 17, S. ambigua.—1, Plant, one-third size; 2, achenium; 3, sta-
men; 4, bracts, natural size.
Plate 18, S. rigida Pursh.—1, Plant, one-half size; 2, 3, leaves, one-
half size; 4, achenium; 5, cross section of achenium; 6, stamen.
Plate 19, S. graminea Michx.—1, Plant, one-half size; 2, leaf, natural
size; 3, achenium, lateral and 4, dorsal view; 5, seed; 6, stamen.
36
3 RR a aa MISS A
SAGITTARIA AND LOPHOTOCARPUS. 63
Plate 20, S. graminea cycloptera.—1, Plant, one-half natural size; 2,
achenium; 3, cross section of achenium; 4, stamen; 5, bracts, X 2.
Plate 21, S. graminea Chapmani. —1, Plant, one-third natural size; 2,
achenium; 3, stamen; 4, bracts, natural size.
Plate 22, 9. cristata Engelm.—1, Plant, one-third natural size; 2,
achenium, lateral and 3, dorsal view, 4, cross-section; 5, stamen, ripe and
6, effete.
Plate 23, S. macrocarpa. —1, Plant, one-half size; 2, achenium; 3,
stamen.
Plate 24, S. teres S. Wats. —1, Plant, one-half size; 2, stolon, natural
size; 8, achenium, lateral view and 4, in cross section; 5, stamen.
Plate 25, S. papillosa Buch.—1, Plant, one-fourth size; 2, achenium;
8, stamen; 4, bracts, X 6.
Plate 26, S. platyphylla (Engelm.)— 1, Plant, one-half size; 2, ache-
nium; 3, stamen; 4, fruiting scape, one-half size; 5, 6, leaves, one-half
size.
Plate 27, S. Mexicana Steudel.—1, Plant, one-third natural size; 2,
immature achenium; 38, stamen from bud; 4, stamen.
Plate 28, S. Sanfordii Greene.—1, Plant, one-third natural size; 2,
achenium; 3,stamen; 4, leaf, one-half natural size.
Plate 29, S. Montevidensis Cham. and Schl.—1, Plant, one-fourth
natural size; 2, achenium, lateral view and 8, cross-section; 4, stamen;
5, staminate flower, one-half natural size.
37
64
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
INDEX TO SPECIES OF SAGITTARIA.
The references are to the subpagination of the article. Synonyms are in
acutifolia (24)
ambigua 5, 22.
angustifolia (33 )
arifolia 5, 6.
stricta 8.
calycina (34)
Chinensis (9, 12)
cristata 5, 27.
cuneata 5, 8.
demersa 6, 32.
Engelmanniana 5,
15.
falcata (21)
filiformis 6, 20
gracilis (8)
graminea 4, 5 (20)
, 24.
Chapmani 26.
cycloptera 4, 26.
platyphylla (4,
29).
Greggii 5, 17.
Guyanensis (4,35 )
hastata (9)
heterophylla( 4,23)
38
parenthesis.
angustifolia (23)
elliptica (23)
rigida (28)
lancifolia 4, 21( 22)
angustifolia4,33.
falcata 21.
major (21)
papillosa (29)
latifolia 2-5, 7, 8
pubescens 14.
longiloba 4, 5, 16.
longirostra 5, 16.
macrocarpa 5, 27
macrophylla (30,
33)
Mexicana 6, 30, 33
Montevidensis 6,31.
natans (18, 19)
gracillima (19)
lorata (18)
obtusa (9, 11)
papillosa, 4, 5, 29.
platyphylla 5, 29.
pubescens (14)
Purshii (24)
pusilla (18)
recurva (30)
rigida 5, 23.
sagittifolia 7 (2,9)
longirostra (16)
macrophylla(9)
Mexicana (16)
minor (6)
pubescens (14)
simplex (24)
variabilis (9)
vulgaris (9)
Sanfordii 6, 31.
simplex (8, 24)
Sinensis (9, 12)
stolonifera (24)
subulata 5, 18.
gracillima 19.
natans 18.
teres 5, 28.
variabilis (8)
angustifolia (9)
diversifolia (9,
14)
gracilis (9, 15)
hastata (6, 9)
pubescens (14)
REPT. MO. Bot. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 1,
SAGITTARIA ARIFOLIA and var. STRICTA.
REPT. Mo. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 38.
'AK,
RY An
aC
‘ ’
WENT
AN AN "f
AN Ne A
4d
7 8 ot
Uf Pass
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA, a and 8, and 8. SINENSIS.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 5.
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA, c.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 6.
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA, @.
REPT. Mo. Bot. GARD., VOL. 6.
PLATE 7.
ff}
' Ah NS
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA, e.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD.
PLATE 8,
» VOL, 6.
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA, PUBESCENS.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL, 6. PLATE 9. :
SAGITTARIA ENGELMANNIANA.
REPT. MO, BOT. GARD.,, VOL. 6. PLATE 10.
Avil
Fix; m\
: YIN vi >»
; Jf ; HH) ih
a VA, ny / | \
7 Y FI | |
j Hh {|
SAGITTARIA LONGIROSTRA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 1].
a ee
SAGITTARIA LONGILOBA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 12.
iT
i|
SAGITLARIA GREGGIL,
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 13.
SAGITTARIA SUBULATA and var. GRACILLIMA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 15.
SAGITTARIA DEMERSA and 8, FILIFORMIS.
PLATE 16.
Rept. Mo. Bot. GARD., VOL. (i.
SAGITTARTIA LANCIFOLIA and var. FALCATA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL 6, PLATE 17.
SAGITTARIA AMBIGUA.
PLATE 18.
REPT. MO. Bor. GARD., VOL. 6.
Gee
SAGITTARIA RIGIDA.
PLATE 19,
REPT.
Mo, Bot. GARD., VOL. 6.
SAGITIARIA GRAMINEA.
Rept. Mo. Bot, GARD.» VOL, 6,
PLATE ;
SAGITTARIA GRAMINEA CYCLOPTERA.
oS oe el
REPT. MO. BoT. GARD., VOL. 6.
PLATE 21.
Wit
}
ik
4
i
|
We
YAN
NN
i if
Yih
wi \
W is AX G
WAIN
AK
SAGITTARIA GRAMINEA CHAPMANI.
" mM 1
hs y Ai) Mi
‘ ai
SA
Repr. Mo. Bor. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 22,
SAGITTARIA CRISTATA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6, PLATE 23,
SAGITTARIA MACROCARPA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. . PLATE 24.
SAGITTARIA TERES.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL 6. PLATE 25.
SAGITTARIA PAPILLOSA,
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 26.
SAGITTARIA PLATYPHYLLA.
Rept. Mo. Bor. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 27.
\
W
“7 haa
Ki,
i
A : My /,
WF Wi iy)
SAGITTARIA MEXICANA.
Reet. MO. Bot. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 28,
i " bd
OA i= A
\
dh
SAGITTARIA SANFORDII.
REPT. MO, Bor. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 29.
‘NOD WNL NI'VNVGINOTA VIVANLIAT
a a eat ee ae haere ares = ae
Reg 2 et a. %
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
BY WILLIAM TRELEASE,
While collecting in the lowlands of southeastern Mis-
souri, in November, 1892, Mr. B. F. Bush discovered a
small tree growing abundantly in the swamp, and collected
specimens of the trunks, branches with staminate catkins,
and a few old leaves. Notwithstanding the incompleteness
of the specimens, Mr. Bush shrewdly located the plant in
Leitneria, a monotypic genus heretofore known with cer-
tainty only from Florida; and a comparison with speci-
mens of L. Floridana in the Garden herbarium, collected
many years ago in Florida by Dr. Chapman and Dr. D. V.
Dean, showed the correctness of the generic determination,
though certain differences in minor points were noticeable.
In April, 1893, he again visited the locality and collected
other material in leaf and with half grown fruit; and
shortly afterward Mr. Henry Eggert gathered it with nearly
mature fruit.
So far as we now know, the tree occurs in the deep
swamps of Butler and Dunklin counties, where it is asso-
ciated with plants of distinctly southern range, such as
Taxodium distichum, Acer rubrum Drummondii, Nyssa
uniflora, Planera aquatica, and Polygonum densiflorum.
As I have convinced myself by personal observation at
Kennett and Neelyville, it grows in rich swamp soil in
sloughs and similar places, which never become dry and
where there is usually from six inches to two or three
feet of water; and Mr. Bush states that along the St. Francis
River it is most frequent in water from three to five feet
deep, where it is rooted in the basal mass of Polygonum
densiflorum, the common swamp smartweed of that region,
which occurs in dense growths often forming a floating
65 5 1
eee
66 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN,
accumulation on which in places a man may walk. Certain
of these sloughs are almost exclusively occupied by the
Leitineria, which has a spreading root system confined to
the surface layers of the soil. Apparently suckers arise
from some of the roots, as is the case with the Ailanthus
and White Poplar, but I have not been able to actually
trace these young shoots to the older plants, though their
root system is usually developed out of proportion to their
size.* The impression made on one by such a Leitneria
swamp is that of a tangle of coarse bushes from five to ten
feet in height, but on closer observation it is evident that
each stem rises separately from the soil or water, so that
the plant lacks the clustered bushy habit which distin-
guishes a shrub from a small tree, and it not infrequently
attains a height of fifteen to twenty feet and forms a trunk
from three to five inches thick toward the base, where it
gradually increases in thickness as do many other swamp
trees.
Such arborescent specimens have a clear cut trunk below
and are loosely branched above, with the ascending ultimate
twigs commonly as thick as a lead pencil. Its bark is gray
below and rather smooth, usually mossgrown where wet.
The twigs incline to brown, or in the case of suckers are
almost orange colored, and are marked by numerous slightly
prominent lenticels usually of a lighter gray. During the
first year they are densely pubescent with ascending dingy
hairs, some of which persist during the second year, but
ultimately they become glabrous. The leaf scars are five-
ranked, rather uniformly distributed along the twig,
slightly elevated, and of a general crescent form with
obtuse angles and a not infrequent trilobation. Each con-
tains three relatively large bundle scars. No stipule scars
are to be seen. :
The small persistent terminal bud is broadly conical and
* Apparently connected with this mode of spreading, is the preponder-
ance of one sex in each swamp; a fact which Dr. Dean also informs me
he has observed in Florida.
2
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 67
protected by about a dozen obtusely triangular gray-tomen-
tose scales, which evidently represent undeveloped leaves
and some of which usually persist for a year or two at the
annual nodes, ultimately leaving rings of narrow transverse
scars marking the site of former winter buds. On mature
plants the upper axillary buds are generally flower buds,
and develop in the autumn into oblong erect subsessile
hairy catkins about half an inch long, surrounded at base
by the bud scales, which pass into the very acute scales of
the inflorescence. The trees are dioecious, and while the
catkin character of the flower shoots is very evident on
the staminate trees, it is much less noticeable on pistillate
trees, the catkins of which are not above half the thickness
of the others, and with correspondingly narrower scales.
The lateral leaf buds are half ovoid, small, appressed to the
stem, and protected by a few scales similar to those of the
terminal bud. So far as has been observed, no super-
numerary buds, either collateral or superposed, occur.
The leaves are lanceolate to elliptical lanceolate, acute at
each end, entire, very narrowly revolute, 3 to 4 inches long,
on half-round petioles about 1 in. long, and densely ap-
pressed villous, with a few interspersed clavate glandular
hairs, especially on the petiole, and evident only on close in-
spection. With age they may become as much as 3 X 7 in.
with petioles 2 to 3 in. long, and are then glabrate and some-
what glossy above except along the midrib and principal
veins, thick and of coriaceous texture, and finally very
rugose on the paler under surface from the prominence of
even the finer veins. Stipules have not been seen.*
The flowers expand before the leaves, early in March,
when Acer rubrum Drummondii is in bloom. The stam-
*In Leitneria Floridana stipules are said to occur by Baillon, Hist.
des Plantes, vi. 241; Van Tieghem & Lecomte, Bull. Soc. Bot. de France,
xxxiii. 184; and Heim, Recherches sur les Diptérocarpacées, — Thesis,
Paris, 1892,—-176. They are not found by Chapman, FI. So. U. S. 428;
Oliver, Hooker’s Icones Plant. ser. 3, i. pl. 1044; and Bentham & Hooker,
Genera Plantarun, iii. 397.
3
68 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
inate catkins then become from one to two inches long,
generally curved outwards, and their scales spread just
enough to expose the stamens and allow the very abundant
and powdery yellow pollen to escape. The soft paren-
chyma of the axis of inflorescence becomes torn in various
directions as the catkins elongate, so that when they have
reached their full development it is loosely fissured through-
out. The fibrovascular bundles at the same time are poorly
developed and almost unlignified, so that it is almost impos-
sible to dissect a catkin without tearing it in pieces. The
same loose texture exists in the basal part of the catkin
scales, where they have increased in length during anthesis,
and as the outer part is considerably longer than the inner, it
assumes a series of characteristic transverse wrinkles below.
This separation of the tissues in both axis and bract, gives
rise to the curious appearance in longitudinal section which
is shown in plate 32, fig. 4-5, for the cleft in each bract is
decurrent down the axis to the point where the firmer fibro-
vascular bundles emerge for the next flower. The staminate
flowers, so far as I have examined them, are glabrous and
quite destitute of a perianth or involucre of any description,
and consist simply of a whorl of about ten short filaments a
little dilated at base and surmounted by slightly versatile but
nearly erect extrorse two-celled anthers dehiscing longitu-
dinally. The pollen grains are nearly globose, smooth,
slightly 3 to 4-grooved with underlying thickening of the
intine, and fall from the dehiscent anther very readily, and
there is no doubt that the species is wind pollinated.*
The pistillate catkins possess the same loose lacunose
structure as the staminate, though the axis is far less torn.
When fully developed they are rarely over half an inch long,
and it requires some little care to detect their presence on
* The structure of the staminate flowers, aside from the lacunose
character of the axis and bract, and the extrorse facing of the anthers, is
well shown by Baillon, J. c. 240, f. 214; Oliver, J. c. f. 1 to 3; and Heim,
i.c. pl. 10, f. 1 to 6. Baillon, J. c. 239, mentions bractlets as being some-
times present.
4
eR a RE Ae te Bs SEP ae nS,
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 69
the trees, whereas the staminate catkins are very evident
from a considerable distance. Unlike the staminate flow-
ers, the pistillate, which are limited to the upper axils, are
very short-stalked or with a rudimentary disk, and possess
a rudimentary involucre or perianth of a few small, glandu-
lar-fringed scales, the largest two of which stand nearly
laterally while the remainder are dispersed along the side
next the axis of the catkin.* Only one carpel is present.
The ovary is shortly ovoid, finely pubescent, one-celled, and
contains a single ascending parietal ovule with the micropyle
directed upwards. The green or slightly reddish style is
attached a little at one side and in anthesis curves outwards
and becomes grooved on the stigmatic side, or somewhat
flattened, with the stigmatic surface undulated, possessing
the general characters of wind-pollinated stigmas. The
placenta and stigmatic groove are turned away from the
axis and face the bract, a very unusual position for the
suture in a monocarpellary flower, and one which appears
to indicate that the flower is in reality reduced from a
former state in which there were two carpels radially ar-
ranged with reference to the bract, or perhaps a larger num-
ber; and this inference that the simple flower of Letinera
has been formed by the reduction of an originally more com-
plex flower is further supported by the presence of a rudi-
mentary perianth about the pistil, and by the reported
occurrence of abortive pistils near the end of the staminate
catkins in some instances,f and of one or more stamens
within the scales of occasional pistillate flowers.
The fruit is an erect compressed dry drupe measuring
* Eichler (Blithendiagramme, ii. 42) calls attention-to the large size
of the lateral scales, which, from analogy with Myrica, he regards as
bractlets, considering the others as a perigone, and Van Tighem &
Lecomte (1. c. 184) recognize a calyx as present in the pistillate flower.
Heim (Ass. Frang. J. c. 231) on the other hand speaks of the absence of
both calyx and corolla, in agreement with Baillon, who speaks of the
whorl of scales as a false calyx (1. c. 240, note).
+ Oliver, Hooker’s Icones, J. c. p. 34.
t Baillon, Hist. vi. 240, note.
70 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
about 6X8X22 mm. in the Floridan specimens, though in
the few Missouri specimens that I have seen it was of
scarcely more than half this size. Its surface is coarsely
rugose-reticulated over the firm fibrovascular bundles of
the pericarp. Near the top it is marked by an oblique scar
left by the caducous style, and it contains a single large
seed with a straight embryo and a rather thin layer of
albumen. *
So far as can be made out at present, the Missouri
Leitneria differs from that of Florida only in its larger
size,— the southern plant being described as a shrub 2 to
6 feet high,—in its somewhat larger more coriaceous
leaves rarely more than acute at apex, while those of the
Floridan plant are usually somewhat acuminate, and in its
apparently smaller fruit. Neither of these characters,
however, need of necessity be of specific value, nor repre-
sent more than individual variation due to habitat, climate,
or age.
In an account accompanying his illustrations of. Leitneria
Floridana, Professor Oliver | mentions ‘‘ specimens of per-
haps a second species of Ledtneria from Texas, collected by
Drummond; ’’ and Bentham and Hooker { and Hemsley §
admit this probable second species. In reply to an inquiry,
Professor Oliver writes me that the material of this form
consists of imperfect specimens without original label but
labeled by Sir William Hooker as from ‘Rio Brazos,
Texas, Drummond; ’’ and he adds that so far as these
specimens go, he does not now see any reason why they
should not belong to LZ. Floridana, though the catkins are
* Except for the extrorse placental suture, and the lacunose bracts
and axis, the structure of the pistillate flowers is well shown by Baillon,
f. 215; Heim, pl. 10, f. 7 to 10; and Oliver, f. 6 to 8 — where the position
of the stigmatic groove is correctly shown, but the placenta inverted.
The fruit and seed characters are also shown by Baillon, f. 216; Heim,
pl. 10, f. 11 to 22; and Oliver, f. 9.
¢ Hooker’s Icones Plantarum, 8 ser. i. p. 34.
¢ Genera Plant. iii. 397.
§ Biol. Centr. Amer., Bot. iii. 162, iv. 193.
6
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. i pi
perhaps slenderer. In a letter accompanying this note,
Mr. Hemsley states that he also suspects that all of the
Leitneria material is of one species.
Dr. Chapman informs me that in Florida the original
stations of the species on the coast have long since been
washed away, but he afterwards found it inland, where,
nevertheless, its distribution is not known to be more than
very restricted. Whether the Texan material referred to
above was actually gathered along the Brazos, or possibly
further east, where Drummond also collected extensively,
the.occurrence of Leitneria in Missouri is, therefore, very
remarkable. But the investigations of Mr. Bush have
shown that this part of our State is a meeting-point for the
floras of the Middle States, the eastern Gulf region and
Texas.*
The reason for the extension of the Gulf Flora noted,
appears to lie in the deep swampy character of much of
the land along the general course of the Mississippi River
in southern Missouri and northern Arkansas as well as
further toward the Gulf. This entire region is noted for
the present fluctuations in its water level, due to artificial
elevation of the immediate bounds of the great river and
its tributaries, some of which nevertheless are destroyed
almost every year during freshets; but presumable natural
changes, and the large measure of success which has been
reached in confining the streams to their channels and
inducing a more rapid flow near the mouth of the Missis-
sippi, have resulted in lowering the maximum average level
of the water in case of inundation, and a far more per-
fect drainage of the lowlands than formerly, during the
season of low water. This seems to be indicated quite
clearly by a study of the cypress trees of the region. I
believe it is generally admitted that the level to which the
root knees of the cypress rise in wet cypress swamps cor-
responds closely with the normal flood water level. This is
* Fifth Garden Report, 140.
TT? MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
the case in the deep sloughs of the Varner and St. Francis
rivers near Kennett, though at low water the knees emerge
about two feet. But here and there dead knees, quite
unconnected with standing trunks, or clearly belonging to
the shells of old trees none of which are now living, rise
some three feet beyond the level marked by the knees of
existing trees. These vestiges of an earlier forest growth
appear to indicate that when they were in their prime the
water level stood several feet above the present flood
level, and so far as can be estimated from the trees this
was somewhere from two hundred to five hundred years
ago.
Professor R. Ellsworth Cail, who has made a geological
study of the region in which these plants now appear to
find their northernmost home, writes me that the Mis-
sissippi river formerly without question flowed far to the
west of its course to-day, and in comparatively recent
geologic times cut away the opposing ridge below Cape
Girardeau, and excavated its present channel and the low-
lands around. Meantime it has swung across the valley
several times, but its westward movement has been succegs-
fully resisted by the remains of the great Tertiary plateau
or northward deposit of the ancient Gulf, which extends
from Florida to Mexico and northwards to this region, of
which Crowley’s Ridge is believed to be the last remaining
vestige in the middle valley. He mentions as interesting
in connection with these changes in the Mississippi and its
immediate valley, the fact that the Ohio long preserved its
integrity to a point not far from the present site of
Helena. He also states that there can be no question that
these changes at times have been retarded by depression of
the whole area, and at times hastened by elevation; that
there have been comparatively recent times when all the
region about northeast Arkansas and southeast Missouri
was a veritable marshy waste; and that this condition has
been several times repeated, with a synchronous ameliora-
8
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 73
tion of climate favoring the northward extension of a
subtropical flora over the region.*
It seems probable, therefore, that Leitneria and the
species of the Floridan flora which accompany it in the
Missouri swamps, represent the remnants of a warm tem-
perate swamp flora which at one time extended continuously
in the low lands, around the coast and up the river, from
Florida to the upper limits of the present deep swamps;
and that they are now likely to be found in such situations
at any point between the extremes, where the original
conditions have remained little or not at all changed by the
general drainage which has been progressing at least for
the last few centuries. One of the most promising fields
for botanical exploration in the eastern United States, and
one of the least known, is the swamp region of the lower
Mississippi Valley and the Gulf Coast; and I have little
doubt that a fuller knowledge of the flora of this region
will not only confirm the explanation here offered of the
occurence of Leitneria in Missouri, but extend its known
range from this point to its original locality in Florida.
Unless there is an error in the label of Drummond’s speci-
men, it should also be found in similar situations across
Louisiana and around the Gulf in Texas.
Mr. Bush’s attention was first called to the occurrence
of Leitneria in Missouri by the frequent mention in the
swamps of avery light ‘‘ cork wood,’’ greatly surpassing
even young tupelo (Vyssa) in buoyancy, and much used
by fishermen for floats on their nets; and the trunks which
he placed in my hands were of such surprising lightness
that I requested my friend Professor Nipher to determine
the specific gravity of the decorticated wood. An exam-
* The results of Professor Call’s work, here briefly outlined from his
letter, are to be found in the Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of
Science, 1887-9, 52, 85, and more fully, as volume ii. for 1889 of the
Reports on the Arkansas Geological Survey. See, further, a paper by him
in Amer. Journ. Sci. and Arts, 1891, xlii. 394, on the fossil woods of this
region, also considered in his larger report.
9
74 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
*
ination by his assistant, Mr. Brogan, shows it to possess a
density of 0.207, water being taken as unity.* As is often
the case with the roots of light trees, those of this species
are appreciably lighter than the stem, and a similar deter-
mination made by Mr. Timmerman at the request of Pro-
fessor Nipher, gives for its root wood a density of 0.151,
though as a cylinder of 3.79 cc. only could be used, it is
probable that this determination is less accurate than that
for the trunk.
In his treatise on the forest trees of the United States, f
Professor Sargent gives a tabulation of the specific gravity of
the woods of all the North American trees recognized at that
time, as determined at the Watertown Arsenal. From his
tables it appears that the lightest known native wood (that
of Ficus aurea of Florida), has a density of 0.2616, and
the heaviest (also a Floridan species, Condalia ferrea), has
a specific gravity of 1.302, while the density of the great
majority of species lies between 0.400 and 0.800.t
From a set of tables based on the experiments of
Captain Fowke,§ on the woods exhibited at the Paris
Exposition of 1855, and the London Exposition of 1867, it
appears that an East Indian wood, ‘‘ Dedoaf Tha,’ has a
specific gravity of 0.260, very nearly that of Ficus aurea
* Professor Nipher informs me that in the determination, a cylinder
was used, turned as accurately as possible, which was measured at a
sufficient number of points to give average values, and the density was
obtained by calculation from the dry weight of the cylinder, correction
being made for absorption of water between the time of removal from
the drying bath and the completion of the weighing, it having been found
that the gain from the atmosphere was .007 gr. per minute, for the
cylinder used.
t Final Rept. Tenth Census, ix. 249,
{ As a few examples may be mentioned the common hickories, ranging
from 0.810 to 0.887, white oak, 0.747, tupelo, 0.519, the willows and pop-
lars, usually considered very light woods, and lying between 0.363 and
0.607, and white cedar, a favorite material for light boat construction,
with a density of 0.332.
§ Science and Art Department of the Committee of Council on Edu-
cation, London, printed by George E. Eyre and William Spottiswoode,
1867, p. 10.
10
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 15
as given in the census tables. Ochroma lagopus, one of a
number of so-called cork woods enumerated by Wiesner,*
is said to have a density of 0.250,f but I cannot place my
hand on any determinations lower than this. Professor
Nipher tells me that the specific gravity of common cork
(the bark of Quercus Suber) is given by Ganot as 0.240.
Although individual variability and the difficulties of deter-
mining the specific gravity of porous and absorbent bodies
like wood make it unwise to accept any of these figures as
invariable, it appears from them that the wood of Leitneria
is very markedly lighter than the bark of the cork oak,
which itself is considerably lighter than any other wood of
which a record can be found.
0.16-0.20
0.46-0.58
0.61-0.65
0.71-0.75
0.91-0.95
1,.26-1.30
q y
FREQUENCY OF TIMBER DENSITIES.
The appended curve, compiled from the census tables,
shows the relative frequency of occurrence of the different
degrees of density in our native timbers, each co-ordinate
representing a difference of .050, and each species falling
within this range being represented by a vertical distance of
* Rohstoffe, 578.
+ Goodale, Physiological Botany, 145.
11
—
76 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
1 mm. on the co-ordinate. Thus, one species has a specific
gravity between 0.16 and 0.20 inclusive; none occur be-
tween 0.21 and 0.25; 46 are found between 0.46 and 0.50;
and 50 lie between 0.71 and 0.75. The majority of species
(242) occur between the maximal points of 0.46 and 0.75,
and it is evident that the fall is much more abrupt from
these common densities to the lowest recorded density than
to the highest, so that any extension in this direction is
more remarkable than a corresponding one in the other.
As the density of wood freed from resin etc., air and
water, is about one-half greater than that of water, the
reason for the extreme lightness of the wood of Lettneria
is to be looked for in connection with its loose structure,
the softness of its tissues, which are easily compressible
under the thumb nail, and the absence, at least in the
largest specimens I have seen, of any heart wood, the tex-
ture being homogeneous throughout.* It was, therefore,
subjected to a rather careful microscopical examination,
with the following results.t
The pith is nearly round in cross section, although where
the bundles of the primary wood join it they project
slightly, giving it a minutely crenulate outline. It is con-
tinuous and of uniform texture, thus differing from the
pith of plants like Paulownia and Lonicera which are ex-
cavated, or Juglans, which is chambered,t and from that of
Liriodendron, etc., which, though solid, is traversed by
firmer transverse plates. The cells, as is usual in pith, are
approximately isodiametric and polygonal, as seen in cross
section, a little smaller near the periphery ; and in longi-
* On this general subject see Nérdlinger, Gewerblichen Eigenschaften
der Holzer, Stuttgart, 1890, 17; and Techn. Eigenschaften der Hélzer,
Stuttgart, 1860, 115.
¢ The substance of this paper was presented orally before the
Academy of Science of St. Louis on May first, 1893, and illustrated by
specimens of the plant and photomicrographs, some of which are here
reproduced in half tone or are made the basis of line engravings, show-
ing the structure of the wood and bark.
t The ‘‘ discoid pith ’’ of Morren, in Ann. of Nat, Hist. 1839, iv. 73.
12
ae ee Lame,
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. FT
tudinal section they often appear as rectangles, with their
greatest diameter transverse. Their walls, which are very
thin, show, nevertheless, a decided secondary thickening,
and are marked by simple pits, as is usual in pith of this
description. Toward the wood, and especially where the
pith rays pass outward to the branches, occasional cells in
more or less marked vertical rows occur, with large stellate
crystals.
At the margin of the pith a number of layers of cells of
reduced diameter but several times as long as the pith cells,
constitute a pith sheath, and gradually merge into what
are virtually wood parenchyma cells. They have the same
simple pits as the pith cells, but are arranged in vertical
rows in relation with the elements of the xylem, and vary
in length from twice to four or five times their diameter.
In the mass of parenchyma so formed at the margin of the
pith, are found intercellular secretion reservoirs, each of
which is surrounded by a layer of oblong secreting cells
with walls not appreciably thinner than those of the paren-
chyma immediately about them. From one to two dozen
such passages are to be seen in a cross section of the stem.*
Though as a rule they occur singly, it is not uncommon for
two of equal size to stand close together, separated by only
a few layers of cells, or for small ones to stand on one or
both sides of a larger one. The secreting cells are usually
* These were formerly attributed by Van Tieghem (Ann. des Sci. Nat.
7 ser, i. 64, and Van Tieghem and Lecomte, Bull. Soc. Bot. de France,
1886, xxxiii. 182) to the apexes of the primary xylem wedges, but, ac-
cepting as the inner limit of the wood, the position of the innermost
vessels, Professor Van Tieghem now recognizes these secretion pas-
sages as pertaining to the pith (Morot’s Journal de Botanique, v. 384,
385), thus coming into agreement with Miiller (Engler’s Bot. Jahr-
biicher, ii. 449), Burck (Amn. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, vi. 151), and Heim
(Ass. Frang. p. l’Avanc. des Sciences, 1891, i. 231; Rech. s. les Diptéro-
carpacées, Thesis, 1892, 175), who have attributed the similarly situated
passages of Dipterocarpeae to the pith. But Reinsch, Engler’s Jahrb. xi.
374, speaking of the Balsamifluae, again calls attention to their close con-
nection with the xylem, and, indeed, it appears extremely difficult so to
define the hadrom bundle as unequivocally \to separate it from the
adjacent pith.
13
78 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
quite convex on the free side, and sometimes protrude into
the passage as papillae or in balloon-like outgrowths. Their
secretion is a yellowish resin, which fills the passages in
sections cut dry and examined in water, but rapidly dis-
solves when this is replaced by alcohol drawn in at one side
of the cover glass, leaving a residue of fine emulsion drops
similar to those formed when an imperfectly anhydrated
preparation is mounted in Canada balsam. In sections ex-
amined in water after being cut dry, the contents of the
secretion passages are traversed by fractures, sometimes
regularly curved, and their high refractive power gives rise
to the appearance of a limiting membrane about the indi-
vidual masses, suggestive of a raised cuticule of the secret-
ing cells, beneath which, according to Tschirch,* the
formation of the resins of schizogene passages occurs. In
observing the solution of the resin on the addition of alco-
hol, however, the apparent membranes are seen to com-
pletely disappear at once, and I have not been able to detect
either cuticular blisters or vestiges of the bases of such
blisters in these sections after the solution of the resin, nor
in any of the numerous sections of alcoholic material which
I have examined. ft
Just outwards from the situation of this ring of secretion
passages, each wedge of the hadrom or xylem begins with
* Berichte Deutsch. Bot. Ges. xi. 201, and Pringsheim’s Jahrb. xxv.
375.
+ Some difference of opinion exists as to the nature of the secretion
within these passages. Van Tieghem and Lecomte (1. c. 182) speak of it
as a resin, while Heim (Thesis, 176) calls it a balsam. The entire
group of terpenes, ethereal oils, resins, and balsams, is a difficult one
chemically, and I do not venture to pronounce on the one now in ques-
tion further than to say that it is insoluble in water, soluble in cold
alcohol except for the emulsion residue referred to above, and that Mr.
Bay, who at my request tested it with the Unverdorben-Franchimont
reaction to acetate of copper (Poulsen, Mikrochemie, 73; Zimmermann,
Bot. Mikrotechnik, 89), found that it assumes with this reagent the green
color characteristic of resins and terpenes. It may be noted that the
same reagent gives an abundant brown precipitate throughout the bark,
indicative of the presence of tannin. On the resins see further Tschirch,
Pringsheim’s Jahrb. xxv. 370.
14
Sod (Sg. Sada ha ra
; a, ea cs 5
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. VAS)
a few tracheides and spiral vessels about 20 » in diameter,
surrounded by wood parenchyma. Aside from this, except
where the bundles pass out to the leaves, no true spirals
occur in the stem. The remainder of the xylem consists
of pitted tracheides and ducts, wood parenchyma, and,
chiefly, libriform cells. Except for the spiral vessels men-
tioned above, the vascular elements of the wood are all
furnished with bordered pits, a scalariform reticulation
marking their contact with the medullary rays.
The pitted vessels are distributed through the stem in a
characteristic way, as is usual in woody plants. Each year’s
growth in the secondary wood begins with a greatly inter-
rupted row of vessels large for the plant, and measuring
from 50 to 95 » in diameter. In addition to these vernal
ducts, each year’s zone of wood contains a number of
groups of similar but smaller vessels, which are arranged
either approximately parallel to the circumference or with
an oblique direction outwards, often strongly accentuated
in the older wood where it may become quite radial, and,
as acommon thing, grading in size from the middle to each
extremity or from one end to the other, most diameter
measurements lying between 25 and 35». These groups
consist of the elements usual in such duct accumulations,
namely vessels, tracheides, and wood parenchyma. The
vessels show a complete disappearance of the cross septa
which originally divided the vertical rows of rather short
cells from which they arise, except for a narrow ring
around the margin, in this respect differing very markedly
from the similar vessels of Liriodendron, Liquidambar,
etc., where the perforations are formed in such a way as to
leave the original septum as a persistent scalariform plate
running obliquely across the mature duct.
The wood parenchyma, which is not abundant, and stands
in close connection with the ducts and annual rings, does not
differ particularly from the parenchyma already described
about the secretion passages in the pith sheath. The tra-
cheides as arule are similar to the libriform or common wood
15
———— ee
80 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
cells, presently to be described, except that their walls are
somewhat thicker,—sometimes much thicker,—and marked,
even on the tangential sides, with bordered pits very different
from the simple pits of the libriform cells and parenchyma.
Their walls not infrequently show a spiral striation which
in its most marked form consists in a fine acute spiral ridg-
ing of the inner surface of the cell, the ridges, however,
differing from those of the spiral vessels in being wedge
shaped with a broad base, whereas in the vessels they are
of a generally round section, and attached by a narrow
base, which is easily broken, so that they can be uncoiled
from within the lumen.
Except for these masses of vessels with their accompa-
niment, and a layer of cells presently to be described, at
the limits of each year’s growth, the wood consists of
libriform or ordinary wood cells, which differ from the
tracheides in possessing on the radial walls very small,
obliquely crossing, not evidently bordered pits, scattered or
irregularly grouped. They are fusiform or, more accurately,
obliquely truncated at the ends, which overlap in such a
way as to be very evident in tangential sections while much
less obvious in radial sections. Their length is usually
fifteen to twenty times their diameter, the measurements as
a rule lying between 15 X275 and 20X375. Now and then
these libriform cells are found with transverse partitions
running directly across, one or two to each cell, a condition
that has been observed frequently in other woods. While
striation is much less evident than in some of the tracheides,
it is sometimes to be seen.
Rings indicative of the annual (or more accurately
periodic) growth in thickness of the stem, though nearly
invisible to the naked eye, are evident on an examination
of the wood under a lens, being partly caused by the
occurrence of a broken row of vernal ducts, and in part by
a gradual reduction in the radial diameter of a few rows of
libriform cells formed toward the end of the growing sea-
son, whereas those first formed the next spring are of
16
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 81
ample size. The most striking feature of these annual
rings, however, consists in the production of a row of
parenchyma cells replacing the libriform as the first series
cut off by the cambium each spring at the beginning of the
year’s growth. These cells are about ten times as long as
broad, with horizontal septa, some of which are evident in
all cross and radial sections of the wood, and, like other
cells of the wood parenchyma, they show simple pits similar
to those of the medullary rays. Exceptionally this annual
layer of parenchyma is locally doubled by tangential
division.
Between the xylem wedges occur the usual medullary
rays. So far as I have seen, these rays, except where they
stand in connection with pith rays, are not more than two
cells in thickness, and it is extremely unusual to discover
more than a single row of cells in their cross or tan-
gential section. As seen in longitudinal section, they
consist of from one to about twenty vertical series of cells,
most commonly about ten. These cells usually measure 18
to 25 » in height, 7 to 10 » in width, and 40 to 75 » (as
a general thing) to above 100 yin radial length. Their
vertical septa frequently are somewhat oblique when
viewed in either transverse or radial section. Their walls
are thin, and simply pitted to correspond with abutting
cells.
All of the elements of the xylem show the customary
middle lamella, with a secondary thickening, which, how-
ever, is very slight, so that the walls of the libriform cells
are rarely over 1.5 » thick, while the medullary ray cells
are thinner, and the tracheides and the wood parenchyma
cells generally range respectively a little thicker and a little
thinner than the libriform, the vessels being, in fact, the
only thick walled cells of the wood, except for occasional
groups of exceptionally thickened tracheides.
From its gross anatomical characters, the wood of Leit-
neria would be compared with Hartig’s group of dicotyle-
donous woods having all of the ducts small, those of the
. 17
82 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
spring growth neither large nor numerous, and the medul-
lary rays invisible to the naked eye.* The occurrence of a
single broken row of vernal ducts somewhat larger than those
of the rest of the year’s growth, the oblique position of the
groups of the latter, and the absence of loose parenchyma-
tous bands, suggest a comparison with Aster argophyllus,
certain species of Ulmus and Celtis, and, particularly,
Daphne Mezereum.t Except for the absence of coarse
parenchyma bands, it also resembles somewhat the wood of
Ailanthus, Hippophae, and numerous Leguminosae, though
in these the vernal ducts are usually larger and more numer-
ous, and the secondary thickening of the medullary rays
and the libriform cells is far more marked.
The cortex of Leitneria, which, as has been stated
above, is rich in tannin, is rather thin, and consists at first
of fundamental parenchyma, which is collenchymatously
thickened, with large often transversely elliptical pits, for
about eight layers of cells immediately below the epidermis,
and passes into a like number of thin walled cells by a tran-
sition through about three layers, while between this primary
cortex and the cambium an abundant secondary cortex is
developed, containing large fan-shaped abundantly crystal-
liferous dilatations of the principal medullary rays, between
which lie broad wedges of bast. Except for a few small
and scattered bundles of hard bast fibers in the pericycle,
at the inner border of the primary cortex close beneath the
collenchyma, none of the bast fibers become thick walled,
but they remain as long wide generally irregularly collapsed
tubes with oblique often clustered simple pits, and destitute
of protoplasm. Traversing these bast wedges are a few
secondary rays, while tangentially they are parted by plates
of thin walled parenchyma cells from two to about five
times as long as broad, with horizontal septa, a few rows
of which contain crystals; and among these cells, rich in
* Hartig, Timbers and How to Know Then, 8.
+ From an examination of Nordlinger’s set of 1100 cross-sections of
woods.— Cf. p. 78 of text accompanying century xi.
18
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 83
protoplasm, sieve tubes should be found.* Thetwo systems
thus map out the bundles, in cross-section, into a series of
quadrangles.
Throughout, like the wood, the cortex is destitute of
secretion passages. The cork, which is formed immedi-
ately next the epidermis ¢ during the first summer, cuts off
a bark which does not become very thick, and is inter-
ruptedly stratified by the intercalation of masses of con-
densed cells between layers of more open cells.{ Grit
cells are entirely absent, and I have not satisfied myself that
the primary cortical parenchyma is added to below the
cork by the formation of phelloderm from the inner limits
of the latter.
In sections just below the nodes, fibro-vascular bundles
may be found running obliquely upwards through the
cortex, from the xylem to the leaf scars. The tracheary
elements of these bundles are spirally marked as in the
primary xylem next the pith, and they are unaccompanied
by secretion passages. So far as I have observed, their
transit through the cortex is effected in a vertical distance
little greater than the thickness of the latter, so that they
* Van Tieghem and Lecomte (J. c. 181) speak of these tangential bands
as consisting of ‘tubes criblés,’’ and it is clearly in them that the sieve
tissue should be found; but notwithstanding repeated examination of
sections from fresh, dry and alcoholic material, which had been subjected
to treatment which renders the sieve tubes of Tilia, Magnolia, Ulmus and
other trees very evident, I have quite failed to demonstrate sieve plates
in the cortex of this species.
+ So far as can be judged from specimens still retaining the epidermis,
but with fifteen or twenty layers of cork cells, the first subepidermal
layer of cortical cells becomes active as phellogen; but as this is formed
in the early summer of the first year, while I have been able to study only
very young shoots and those which had ended the season’s growth, I
have been unable to get a preparation showing the first segmentation,
which would afford conclusive information on this point.
¢t This is to be compared with the annual cork layers described for
Balsamifluae by Reinsch, Engler’s Bot. Jahrb. xi. 367.
§ The occurrence of true cortical bundles in various groups of plants
is discussed by DeBary, Vergl. Anat. 266; Mueller, Engler’s Jahrb. ii.
449; Gilg, Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. xi. 21; Burck, Ann. Jard, Bot. Buiten-
zorg, vi. 156; Heim, Thesis, 18, etc.
19
84 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
really belong to the pulvinus of the leaf, but this does not
prevent them from appearing as distinct cortical bundles in
favorably located sections (pl. 39 and 44f.1-3). Three of
these foliar bundles, corresponding to the three bundle
traces evident on the scars marking the former position of
fallen leaves, pass into each petiole, where they soon unite
to form a closed crescent-shaped ring of bundles. No
isolated bundles are contained within this petiolar ring, the
parenchyma within which includes a series of about twenty
secretion passages similar in structure and contents to those
of the stem, with which, however, they have no direct com-
munication. From the petiole, a group of resin passages
runs through the midrib of the leaf, a single one passing out
into each of the finer veins. Stellate crystals are of rather
frequent occurrence through the petiole and midrib, both
of which contain collenchyma.
The upper epidermis of the leaf blade is smooth walled
except for a few striated cells about the bases of some of
the hairs, and consists of a layer of inconsiderably thick-
ened cells, beneath which lies a layer of quadrate cells each
of which contains a large stellate crystal. A layer of
similar cells is also found between the veins and the lower
epidermis, the cells of which are somewhat smaller and
prominently wrinkled on the outer wall, so as to appear
almost muricate in cross section. The stomata are not
sunken below the general level of the epidermis. Tannin
appears to be abundant in the epidermal layers.
Pubescence consists of two kinds of hairs:— abundant,
slender pointed thick walled hairs, usually with several
transverse septa, especially toward the often bulbously
widened base, and mostly isolated, but occasionally binate ;
and.less numerous clavate hairs, septate both longitudinally
and transversely, their small cells with yellow contents.
These compound hairs are chiefly seen on the young stem,
the sides of the petiole, and the upper surface of the mid-
rib of the leaf. The epidermal cells about the bases of the
hairs are usually divided by a septum parallel to the leaf
20
oe a, ae ee? A oe OP ae POR NO BER AOS
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 85
surface. The mesophyll is composed of two or, mostly,
three layers of compactly placed palisade cells only a little
longer than broad, occupying the upper half of the leaf,
and a spongy parenchyma with ample intercellular spaces
below. No spicular cells have been observed.
The structure of the roots is interesting to this extent,
that (at least in lateral roots, which, alone, have been
examined) they are entirely destitute of secretion passages,
which are thus seen to be confined to the pith sheath of the
stem, the intra-fascicular parenchyma of the petiole, and
the parenchyma of the veins of foliar organs, including the
carpels. The elements of the root are essentially similar
to those of the stem, and secondary growth in thickness is
effected in the manner usual in the roots of Dicotyledons.
While I have found comparatively little starch in the
stem of specimens gathered either in November or in the
spring, the medullary rays and cortical parenchyma of the
root contain an abundance of roundish grains, often binary,
and of extremely variable size.
Dr. Chapman, who described the genus Lettneria and its
single species, placed it among the Myricaceae because of its
simple flowers arranged in spike-like catkins;* and in this
he was followed by DeCandolle.t Subsequently Baillon
examined it, and placed it with doubt in his group of Cas-
taneae, beside Myrica, making it, however, the representa-
tive of a series which he named Leitnerieae,t and in which
he also placed with question a Madagascar genus, Didymeles.
This series was raised by Bentham and Hooker § to ordinal
rank, under the name given by Baillon, and placed between
the Platanaceae and Juglandaceae, with an indication of
Urticaceous affinities, Didymeles being excluded. The
order is maintained under the name Leitneriaceae by
Engler, || who places it between Myricaceae and Salicaceae.
~ * Flora So. U. 8. 427.
+ Prodromus, xvi. (2), 154.
¢ Hist. des Plantes, vi. 239, 258; Tison, in Baillon, Dict. de Bot. iii. 215.
§ Genera Plant. iii. 397.
| Engler and Prantl, Pflanzenfamilien, iii. (1), 28.
21
86 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
In 1886, Van Tieghem and Lecomte,* after a_histo-
logical study of the stem and leaf, decided, because of the
stratification of the bast and the occurrence of secretion
passages in the pith sheath and the leaf, that Lettneria may
be placed in or at least joined to the polypetalous order
Dipterocarpeae, its macroscopic characters being also not
unlike those of that family except for its diclinous reduced
flowers. More recently Heim { has reviewed its histological
characters, and reached the conclusion that its affinities are
rather with the group Balsamifiuae or Liquidambareae of
Hamamelideae (likewise a polypetalous group, with which
Van Tieghem and Lecomte had also recognized that it
might be compared in certain respects), near which for
both anatomical and organographic reasons he would place
the Leitnerieae, while allowing it to retain its autonomy.
Many botanists look on the Apetalae as only a provisional
aggregate of orders with reduced inflorescence, which must
be disrupted before a truly natural system of classification
is reached; and efforts have been made from time to time
to distribute all of these orders among the Polypetalae and
Gamopetalae, just as single apelatous genera and species
are universally placed in orders otherwise characterized by
the possession of more complete flowers. This problem is
one that may be expected to receive aid from the many
comparative histological studies now being made, especially
by French and German botanists, though no purely organ-
ographic system dispensing with the Apetalae has yet met
with more than limited approval.
Against the approximation of the Leitnerieae to the
Balsamifluae, may be urged the absence of secretion pas-
sages from the liber, and the non-scalariform duct perfora-
tions, though the floral structure suggests a possible further
simplification of the type of this group. On the other
hand, the absence of secretion passages from the root, the
* Bull. Soc. Bot. de France, xxxiii. 184.
+ C. Rend. Assoc. Frang. pour 1’Av. des Sci., 1891, i. 281; Recherches
sur les Diptérocarpacées, Thesis, Paris, 1892, 175.
22
RS ee a ara ET Lee tay se
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 87
narrow medullary rays, scanty wood parenchyma and hard
bast, peculiar duct pattern, simple petiolar bundle arrange-
ment, and the venation of the leaves, count against too
close a union of the Leitnerieae with the Dipterocarpeae,—
a conclusion which is further strengthened by the fact that
no existing or fossil representatives of this order are known
from the New World. For the present, therefore, the
order Leitnerieae will probably be maintained either in the
position it now occupies next the Platanaceae, or, in case of
the dismemberment of the Apetalae, near the Dipterocar-
peae or Balsamifluae among the Polypetalae ; and on this
point no one class of histological characters appears to be
conclusive. *
The peculiar lightness and softness of the Missouri cork
wood, combined with its slight porosity, suggest that it
should find application in the arts if, as appears to be the .
case, it can be procured in suitable quantities for econom-
ical working, and while its small size bars it from very
extended use, it is possible that it may prove a useful sub-
stitute for cork in the manufacture of bottle stoppers for
chloroform and other gummy substances, which cause cork
to tear badly after a little use.
* Attention should be called here to the close affinity which Agardh,
Brongniart and Clarke have thought they saw between the Platanaceae and
Balsamiftuae.— On this point see Baillon, Adansonia, x. 134; Eichler,
Bliithendiagramme, ii. 66, and, on anatomical grounds, Gris, Ann. Sci.
Nat., ser. 5, xiv. 40, and Mémoire sur la Moelle, 267, and Reinsch, Engler’s
Jahrb. xi. 369. But Bentham and Hooker (Genera, iii. 396) do not at
all agree with this conclusion.
23
88 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
EXPLANATION ON PLATES ILLUSTRATING LEITNERIA
FLORIDANA.
The habit illustrations were drawn by Miss Grace E.
Johnson, from living plants or herbarium material. The
details are reproduced directly or redrawn from photo-
micrographs or drawings by the author.
Plate 30,— 1, Leafing twig, in spring; 2, autumnal leaf; 3, staminate
catkin; 4, opening pistillate catkin; 5, branch with partly grown fruit.
All natural size.
Plate 31. —1, Pistillate, and 2, staminate shoots, in winter, natural
size; 3, bud and leaf scar details, 3; 4, stem hair, X150; 5, excep-
tional, substellate arrangement of hairs, 200; 6, base of hair, 250;
7, glandular hair, 180; 8, nature print of young leaf, natural size; 9,
lower surface of old leaf, x2.
Plate 32. — 1, Staminate flower, with portion of base of bract, and 2,
dehiscent stamen, <4; 3, ventral, dorsal, and lateral view of indehis-
cent stamen, <9; 4, enlarged longitudinal section of a portion of a
staminate catkin, showing fissuring of bracts; 5, part of a similar sec-
tion, showing extrorse stamens and fissures of bracts and axis of in-
florescence, 18; 6, pollen grain from one end, and in optical section,
400; 7, cross section of pistillate catkin, 18, showing fissured axis
ata, adnate base of bract with fissure at b, receptacle or disk with
perianth, glands, and subtending bract atc, ovary with ovule and sub-
tending bract at d, lower part of stigma with bract at e, and upper
part of stigma with bract at f, — the sections belonging to successively
lower flowers, in the order of lettering, — from one of a series of cel-
loidin sections, retaining the several flowers and their parts in their
natural position.
Plate 33. — Details of pistillate flower and fruit: 1, fully expanded
pistillate catkin, natural size; 2, young flower with bract and scales from
the inner side, 5; 8, longitudinal section of young flower, showing
disk and scales, 18; 4, scales or segments of perianth, 18; 5, longi-
tudinal section of portion of catkin, 18, showing lacunose axis and
bracts, and pistil at point of separation from disk; 6-7, ovule entire and
in section, 18, — the bract at the left asin fig. 5; 8, fertilized ovary
after fall of style, <5; 9-10, partly grown fruits, with longitudinal and
cross sections, <2; 11, dried mature fruit, <2.
Plate 34. — Cross sections of wood of stem, showing duct patterns,
<60.
Plate 35. — Similar sections, for the annual rings, the upper 60, the
lower 125.
Plate 36. — Tangential sections of stem wood, the upper >60, the
lower, showing septate libriform, 125.
24
ae eas ARE
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA. 89
Plate 87. — Tangential section of stem wood, above, showing dilated
ray going to branch, 125; and, below, partial radial section of stem,
60, the xylem at the left, the phloem at the right,—showing complete
duct perforations, stratification of liber, and serial arrangement of crys-
tal cells in the latter.
Plate 38.— Cross section through wood and pith of stem, showing loca-
tion of secretion passages, X60; and radial section of pith, showing the
greater transverse diameter of its cells, x 125.
Plate 39. — Cross section above, of outer part of wood and inner part
of cortex, showing vernal row of ducts, quadrate liber, and, in the
primary cortex, the small ducts of a foliar bundle; below, for compari-
son, a corresponding section of Tilia Americana, with quadrate bast
wedges,— both 60.
Plate 40.— Cross section of primary cortex of very young stem, show-
ing epidermis and collenchyma; below, cross section of liber wedge,
showing thin walled bast fibers with secondary rays and transverse paren-
chyma bands (the section torn through the cambium), — both 125.
Plate 41. — Cross section of central portion of root, showing pith and
xylem, — the large openings are ducts; below, longitudinal section of
secretion passage in petiole, showing elongated form of secreting cells,—
both 60.
Plate 42. — 1, Enlarged radial section of stem xylem, showing medul-
lary ray below, libriform cells at the right, striated transition to tra-
cheides adjoining these, and striated tracheides with bordered pits at the
upper left; 2, radial section, showing reticulated marking of medullary
ray cells in contact with duct, 400; 3, enlarged longitudinal section of
duct, showing bordered pits and remnant of original transverse septum ;
4, much enlarged cross section of wood, showing secondary thickening of
libriform and medullary ray cells; 5, diagram of radial section of xylem
crossed by medullary ray, X200; 6, cross section, and 7, radial section
of xylem, in diagram, 200, showing parenchyma layer at annual ring,—
the vernal wood at the right, the autumnal growth atthe left; 8, diagram
of tangential section of wood, showing libriform cells and medullary
rays, 200.
Plate 43.— 1, Radial section of xylem, showing libriform at the right,
followed by tracheides, vessels, and wood parenchyma, the vessels sub-
scalariform where adjoining a medullary ray, X200; 2, cross section of
secretion passage in pith sheath, 320, pith at the left, xylem at the
right; 3, radial section through the left hand portion of same, 200, be-
ginning with pith at the left, and ending with the secreting cells at the
right; 4, cross section of outer part of pith (above) with stellate crys-
tals, pith sheath, and innermost part of a xylem wedge, showing two
spiral ducts, 200; 5, radial section of outer cortex of old stem, show-
ing stratified cork, 200; 6, similar enlarged section of stem toward end
of first season, showing phellogen layer and subjacent collenchyma; 7,
tangential section of subepidermal collenchyma of young stem, 200; 8,
cross section, and 9, radial section of secondary bast, showing open bast
fibers and interjacent bands of bast parenchyma, 200.
25
90 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
Plate 44.— 1-3, Diagram of successively descending cross sections of
young shoot at emergence of a branch, showing passage of the foliar
bundles through the pulvinus and their union to form the petiole bundle,
9; 4, collenchyma of petiole, 250; 5, radial section of subjacent paren-
chyma, 250; 6, cross section of secretion passage of petiole, 350;
7, cross section of midrib and adjoining lamina of leaf, 30, showing two
forms of pubescence; 8, cross section of very young shoot, showing col-
lenchyma, epidermis, and base of hair, 200; 9, cross section of young
leaf, and stoma, 200, showing crystal layer of upper epidermis, palisade
and spongy parenchyma, and striated lower epidermis.
By accident, the position of the ovule in the upper figure of plate 33,
f. 8 is shown inverted, the true position being that indicated in the cor-
rected figure here given.
26
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 30.
i Pie Cm
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA,
bh alae, td oat (a i aaa ee
REPT. Mo. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 31.
—aee
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
PLATE 32.
Me
A:
=
SAQES
WN
ISS
Ss
SSESg
4
2
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
REPT. MO. BOT GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 33.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
PLATE 34,
REPT. MO Bor. GARD., VOL. 6.
gence ea
Seeekothe
A FLORIDANA
ERI
LEITN
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 35.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
PLATE 36,
REptT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
A.
LEITNERIA FLORIDAN
PLATE 37.
REPT. Mo. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
IDANA.
LOR
AcH
LEITNERI
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE
38.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 39,
é F sig
<
Phe pe
LEITNERIA AND TILIA,
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 40.
ea sich ts ¥e
we Bed he Tepe
Se dwaknie:.:
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
PLATE 41.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA,
PLATE #2.
Rept. Mo. BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARI , VOL. 6. PLATE 43.
a
fC
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
PLATE 44.
REPT. MO. BOT. GARD., VOL 6.
LEITNERIA FLORIDANA.
PLATE 46.
Bot. GARD., VOL. 6.
REPT. Mo.
YUCCA ALOIFOLIA,
Bs»)
ae
*
ape Fi Se 8°, Ass Ra
STUDIES ON THE DISSEMINATION AND LEAF REFLEXION OF
YUCCA ALOIFOLIA AND OTHER SPECIES.
BY HERBERT J. WEBBER.
The Yuccas or Spanish bayonets, since the discovery of
their peculiar and unique methods of pollination, have
become objects of very general interest and study. It is,
however, to the long continued and painstaking researches
of Drs. Engelmann,* Riley ¢ and Trelease { that we are the
most indebted for the very complete information regarding
this phase of the ecology of the genus which we now
possess.
The methods of dissemination in the various species of
Yucca, while very interesting in many features, have as yet
been very little studied. The only account that has come
to the writer’s notice is that given by Dr. Trelease in
the closing paragraphs of his paper on the ** Further Stud-
ies of Yuccas and their Pollination.’’ § Here the adaptation
of the different forms of Yucca fruits to different
methods of seed dissemination is mentioned, and interest-
ing observations are given on the dissemination of Yucca
brevifolia and certain capsular species.
* Engelmann, Geo., “The Flower of Yucca and its Fertilization.”
Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, Vol. II. (1872), pp. 33-87.— “‘ Notes on the
Genus Yucca.”? Trans. St. Louis Acad. of Sci., Vol. IIT. (1873), pp. 17-54.
¢ Riley, C. V., ‘‘On a New Genus in the Lepidopterous Family
Tineidae, with remarks on the Fertilization of Yucca.”? Trans. St.
Louis Acad. Sci., Vol. III. (1873), pp. 55-69. — ‘“¢ The Yucca Moth and
Yucca Pollination.”? Mo. Botanical Garden, 8rd Annual Report (St.
Louis, 1892), pp. 99-158.
t Trelease, Wm., “‘ The Nectary of Yucca.’’ Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, Vol.
XIII. (Aug., 1886), p. 135. — “* Notes and Observations. I. Detail Ilus-
trations of Yucca.’? Mo. Botanical Garden, 3rd Annual Report (St.
Louis, 1892), pp. 161-168. — “ Further Studies of Yuccas and their Polli-
nation.”? Mo. Botanical Garden, 4th Annual Report (St. Louis, 1893), pp.
181-226.
§ Trelease, Wm., l.c., p. 223.
(91)
92 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
There are three types of Yucca fruits which illustrate
three distinct methods of dissemination. These types of
fruits were used by Dr. Engelmann to distinguish the three
groups of the true Yuccas.
Sarcoyucca: — Fruits pendent, fleshy, indehiscent;
seeds thick and wingless, with ruminated endo-
sperm.
Clistoyucca: — Fruits pendent, dry and coriaceous,
indehiscent; seeds thinner than in Sarcoyucca, wing-
less; endosperm entire.
Chaenoyucca :— Fruits erect, capsular with septicidal
dehiscence; seeds strongly compressed and thin
with a winged margin; endosperm entire.
The Sarcoyuccas, comprising nearly one-half of the
known species of Yucca, have sweet edible fruits and are
apparently well adapted for dissemination by fruit-eating
animals, especially birds. In this group the seeds are
usually protected by the inner part of the ovarian wall,
which in the development of the fruit becomes hard and
firm, suggesting in texture and functions the core of an
apple. The pulp is easily removed from the core, which is
more or less shaped to the seeds. This structure would
suggest that the pulp only is eaten, the core and seeds
being thrown away. In this case, the fruits, it would
seem, were intended to be carried away by the animals
eating them in order to remove the seeds from the parent
plant. Birds in picking away the tender pulp would
hardly reach the protected seeds but merely remove the
pulp, leaving the core and seeds. This would not serve the
function desired. Certain species of the Sarcoyuccas,
baccata, valida, and G'uatemalensis, having the papery core,
are said by Dr. Trelease f to fall early. It is quite prob-
able that this is a habit developed to aid in their dissemi-
* Trelease, Wm., ‘‘Notes and Observations. 7. Yucca Guatemalensis
Baker.’’? Mo, Botanical Garden, 5th Annual Report (St. Louis, 1894), p.
166.
DISSEMINATION AND LEAF REFLEXION OF YUCCA. 93
nation. They evidently fall as soon as mature while still
soft and tempting to animals. If this is so they may be
gathered regularly by certain small mammals that carry them
about and eat merely the pulp, discarding the core
and seeds as we discard the apple core. Such animals
would be prevented by the reflexed leaves from climbing
the stems of the plants and securing the fruits in this man-
ner. It is thus necessary that the fruits fall in order that
they may be secured and carried off. In Yucca aloifolia,
with which we will have most to do, this core does not
occur. In the still unripe but nearly mature fruits one
may get a suggestion of it in the rather firm, white mem-
brane which immediately surrounds the seeds. As the
fruit matures, bower it becomes soft throughout and
this is doubtless of decided importance in its dissemination
as it thus affords no resistance or hindrance to birds eating
the pulp from obtaining the seeds at the same time.
In regard to the dissemination of Sarcoyuccas, Trelease *
writes ‘* These fruits are well adapted to dissemination by
fruit-eating animals, especially birds, the seeds being thrown
away, but I do not know of any recorded observations on
their dissemination.’’? This was the condition of our under-
standing of their dissemination, when in the fall of 1892 I
came to Florida and was afforded opportunity to study Y.
aloifolia in its native home. One day a mocking bird was
noticed picking at the pulp of the ripe fruits and this led
to an investigation of the subject of its dissemination.
The fruit of Yucca aloifolia (Plate 47, fig. 1) is elon-
gated elliptical in outline, with usually a slight central
constriction, though this is by no means always the case.
They sometimes reach a length of 15 centimeters but are
usually from 8 to 10 centimeters long. In cross section
(Plate 47, fig. 2) the fruit is hexagonal in shape, caused
by the spreading of the nectar grooves in the ripening of
the fruit. The openings of the septal nectaries may be seen
* Trelease, Wm., “Further Studies of Yuccas and their Pollination,’’
l.c., p. 224,
94 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
in the upper portion of the ripe fruit on which the three
lobed style remains plainly distinguishable, merely having
slightly increased in size during the growth of the fruit
(see Plate 47, fig. 1). The fruit is fleshy throughout with
no indication of a core when fully mature.
In ripening, the fruit passes from green to purple and
finally to dark purple or almost black in age. The pulp,
which is very tender, is of a characteristic sweetish-bitter
taste. The bitter principle is not evident for a few seconds
after tasting the fruit; but like that of the Indian turnip,
though not so strong, soon makes itself known and persists
fora considerabletime. Dr. Trelease* quotes Mr. Burbidge
as having characterized the taste as resembling a mixture of
black currant jam and quinine. The fruits vary somewhat
in taste, some being quite pleasant and agreeable. A
careful selection of the fruits for a number of years would,
I think without question, result in developing valuable edible
varieties. The fruits, it is said, are sometimes eaten by
man. They, however, are surely not much sought and
man only aids in their dissemination incidentally, spreading
the plant by cultivating it as a showy garden perennial. It
is popularly reported that people are occasionally made sick
by eating the fruits.
Extended observations through three seasons have fully
confirmed the fact that the mocking bird (Mimus polyglot-
tus) is a very important factor in aloifolia dissemination,
especially in what may be termed long distance dissemina-
tion. The mocking bird is very abundant throughout
the range of alotfolia and may be the only animal dissem-
inator of this species. At least I have not been able to
observe any other bird or animal eating its fruits. It is
not improbable that the fruit of aloifolia has become es-
pecially adapted for dissemination by the mocking bird or
some small bird of similar habits. The core which occurs
in all other baccate fruited Yuccas known to the author,
* Trelease, Wm., “Notes and Observations. 7. Yucca Guatemalensés
Baker,” 1. c., p. 166,
DISSEMINATION AND LEAF REFLEXION OF yuccA. 99
would be fatal to dissemination by birds of this size and
nature.
Numerous fruiting plants of alotfolia have been exam-
ined and, in almost every case, some or all of the fruits
were found to be somewhat eaten. Sometimes only a
small portion of the pulp will be eaten, but again a large
part of the fruit will have been removed.
The seeds of aloifolia are comparatively thick, being
usually from 2 to 2.5 millimeters, and have a narrow
two-edged rim (Plate 47, fig. 4). They are blackish,
nearly the color of the pulp, and lie imbedded in this
tender substance but a short distance below the surface.
The birds in picking off portions of the pulp, which is
apparently a delicate morsel for them, soon come to the
seeds. These they evidently do not want, but in their
greediness they cannot avoid swallowing some of them.
The birds, while usually quite shy, may yet with a little
perseverance be observed in all the details of feeding. As
portions of the pulp are deftly picked off, frequently a
seed will adhere to the bill by the surrounding sticky pulp.
Many times I have seen the birds throw off these seeds by
a sidewise jerk of the head as a chicken does in trying to
remove dirt or hair from its bill. This results in throwing
the seeds to a considerable distance, frequently from 1 to
2 meters. Many of the seeds taken with the pulp are
apparently swallowed. All of the seeds removed from
the fruits through the agency of the birds are not thrown
to a distance in this manner or swallowed, but many of
them are merely loosened and drop down into the compact
rosette of erect leaves below. These either adhere to the
leaves by the sticky pulp surrounding them or, if dry, roll
down the leaves to the stem where they are effectually
lodged. All over the upper portion of the plant in this
stage, portions of the pulp are scattered, which were acci-
dentally thrown off with the seeds or dropped by the birds
in eating. These portions frequently contain seeds.
While the fruits of aloifolia are in this bird-disseminat-
96 MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN.
ing stage the leaves immediately below the fruit cluster are
erect, that is, point upward forming an angle of from 30°
to 60° with the stem. They are linear lanceolate and rigid
with sharp horny end spines, and are usually from 35 to 65
centimeters long by from 3 to 5 centimeters wide. They
are very numerous and suddenly broaden out at the base,
greatly overlapping each other, so that an almost closed
cup is formed at the apex where the fruit cluster is borne.
The most of those seeds which fall, not being twitched off
by the bird, strike some one of the numerous upper leaves
and adhere until the rain washes them down to the stem
where they are held till a later stage of development when
the upper cluster of leaves, which are now erect, have be-
come reflexed. This stage will be described in detail later.
Many of the seeds are evidently swallowed by the mock-
ing birds with the surrounding pulp. In this case, as in
the majority of pulpy fruits, the seeds are swallowed unin-
jured and resist the action of digestion so that they pass
through the alimentary canal and are evacuated in good
condition for germination. Mocking bird dung, which had
fallen on the Yucca plants, was examined in many cases
and frequently found to contain aloifolia seeds apparently
uninjured.
The stomachs of several mocking birds were examined,
but, although in three cases almost the entire contents of
the stomach was composed of the pulp of aloifolia, no seeds
were discovered.
Having at my home a captured mocking bird I tested
him with aloifolia fruits and seeds. He had become quite
tame and had learned to pick flies from one’s finger. I
first took single seeds surrounded by some pulp. These he
greedily picked from my finger and swallowed without diffi-
culty. During the feeding several seeds were snapped
from his bill, and several were thrown off by a twitch of
the head in trying to free the pulp from the seeds. These
actions correspond exactly with those previously ob-
served in the field. The number of seeds swallowed was
DISSEMINATION AND LEAF REFLEXION OF YUCCA. 97
counted. One seed made the passage of the alimentary
canal and was evacuated in fifteen minutes after the first
seeds were swallowed. At the end of an hour all of the
seeds which were swallowed had been evacuated. The
next day I gave the bird fifteen aloifolia seeds from my F
finger at one feeding. In half an hour thirteen of these
had been evacuated and the others were evacuated before
the end of the hour.
I next gave the bird an entire fruit and watched him
pick off portions of the pulp, occasionally getting a seed.
The cage previous to this had been thoroughly cleaned.
During about four hours, the time he was given access to
the fruit, he ate and evacuated fifty-one seeds.
All of the details of the feeding were watched many
times with this tame bird and the important features of the
feeding, snapping and twitching the seeds, etc., were found
to correspond entirely with what had been observed in the
field. 2
The seeds which were evacuated were apparently in good
condition, but to surely determine this a number of them
were planted. < 5B.
Stenandrium dulce, Nees.— 6, habit sketch, natural size; 7, corolla < 2;
8, stamens, X 5; 9, calyx, X 3; 10, pistil, X 5; 11, capsule and seeds,
x 3
Plate 52. Zephryanthes pulchella, J. G. Smith.—1, habit sketch, natural
size; 2 and 3, styleand stamen, X 3. Z. longifolia Hemsl.— 4, flower and
spathe, natural size; 5 and 6, stamen and style, X 3. Z. Texana Herb.—
7, flower and spathe, natural size; 8 and 9, stamen and style, < 3.
Plate 53. Sagittaria isoetiformis, J. G. Smith.— Habit sketch, natural
size; stamen; and cross section, dorsal and side views of achenium,
10; a cross section of petiole, < 30.
Plate 54. Eragrostis sporoboloides, J. G. Smith and B. ¥. Bush. —Habit
sketch, one-half natural size; spikelet and flowering glume, X 5.
Plate 55. Eragrostis grandiflora, J. G. Smith and B. F. Bush. — Habit
sketch, one-half natural size; offshoot from base of plant with immature
spikelets, natural size; base of spikelet, flowering glume and palet, < 5;
caryopsis, < 15.
Plate 56. Eragrostis Beyrichii, J. G. Smith.— Habit sketch, one-half
natural size; base of spikelet, and flowering glume, X 4; 1, empty
glumes, < 4; 2, face and side view of palet, X 4; caryopsis < 15.
The plates were prepared from drawings made by Miss Grace E.
Johnson, from specimens preserved in the Herbarium of the Missouri
Botanical Garden.
Rept. Mo. Bor. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 48.
SIDA PALMERI?
REPT. MO, BOT. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 49.
|
i]
: +
“|
Sita
FUGOSIA DRUMMONDII.
PLATE 50.
Mo. Bor. GARD., VOL. 6.
REPT.
ll
SEDUM TEXANUM.
PLATE 51.
REPT, MO. BOT. GARD., VOL, 6.
ELYLRARIA AND STENANDRIUM.
REPT. Mo. Bot. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 52.
ZEPHYRANTHES.
Repr. Mo. Bot. GARD., VOL. 6. PLATE 53.
SAGITTARIA ISOETIFORMIS.
PLATE 55.
REPT, MO, BOT. GARD., VOL. 6.
et
a