VP-NRLF THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESENTED BY PROF. CHARLES A. KOFOID AND MRS. PRUDENCE W. KOFOID WITH THE PUBLISHER'S COMPLIMENTS. A Monograph OF THE Anopheles Mosquitoes of India By S. P. JAMES, M.B., I.M.S., Formerly with the Royal Society's Malaria Commission in India, AND W. GLEN LISTON, M.D., I.M.S., Of the Plague Research Laboratory, Parel, Bombay. Calcutta Thacker, Spink & Co 1904 LONDON: W. THACKER & CO., 2, CREED LANE, E.G. CALCUTTA : PRINTED BY THACKER, SPINK AND CO. PREFACE. THIS book has been written at the request of some of our fellow-workers in India, and, for that reason, we need not apologise for its publication. Its scope is indicated in the title. We have attempted to treat the subject clearly, and to describe the different species in such a manner that any specimen which may be encountered will be easily identified. In our opinion this is the most important requirement of any book dealing with mosquitoes, and, in connexion with it, we venture to hope that our coloured plates, which are strictly accurate in detail, will be found helpful. We are much indebted to our friend Dr. Turkhud, of Bombay, for having drawn them, under our direction, with so much care and skill. Although we have not felt able to adopt Mr. Theobald's new classification of " Anopheles," we have given a brief account of his system, and have added, under the title of each mosquito described, the generic and specific names by which the insects are known to him. In common with all medical men in the tropics we owe a debt of gratitude to Professor Ray Lankester for having initiated the work of which Mr. Theobald's admirable treatise is the outcome, to Mr. Theobald himself, and to Colonel Giles, I.M.B. M364118 CONTENTS. PART I.— GENERAL. PAGE. CHAPTER I. — A general account of mosquitoes ... ... 3 CHAPTER IT. — The collection, mounting, examination and identification of "anopheles" mosquitoes and their larvse ... 29 CHAPTER III. — The habits of Indian "Anopheles" ... ... 41 CHAPTER IV. — The classification of "Anopheles" ... ... 59 PART II.— SYSTEMATIC. GROUP I. — A. barbirostris ; A. nigerrimus ... ... ... 77 GROUP II. — A. leucophyrus ; A. punctulatus ... ... ... 82 GROUP III. — A. pulcherrimus ; A. willmori ... ... ... 86 GROUP IV. — A. karwari ; A. fuliginosus ; A. jamesi ; A. maculipalpis ; A. theobaldi ; A. maculatus ... ... ... 89 GROUP V. — A. jeyporiensis ; A. listoni ; A. culicifacies ... ... 101 GROUP VI.— A. rossi ; A. stephensi ... ... ... 109 GROUP VII. — A. turkhudi ... ... ... ... 115 GROUP VIII. — A. lindesayi ; A. gigas ... ... ... 117 GROUP IX. — A. aitkeni ; A. immaculatus ... ... ... 112 GROUP X. — A. culiciformis ... ... ... ... 122 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. COLOURED PLATES AT THE END OP THE BOOK. I. Diagram of a female " anopheles " mosquito. II. Anopheles barbirostris. III. ,, nigerrimus. IV. „ pulcherrimua. V. „ fidiginosus, VI. „ jamesi. VII. „ maculipalpis. VIII. „ theobaldi. IX. ,, jeyporiensis. X. ,, listoni (or fluviatilis). XI. ,, culicifacies. XII. ,, rossi. XIII. ,, stephensi. XIV. ,, turkhitdi. XV. ,, lindesayi. HALF-TONE PLATES FACING THE TEXT. I. Eggs and larvae of " anopheles " and " culex " mos- quitoes ... to face page 7 II. Larvae and pupae of "anopheles" and "culex "mosquitoes „ 9 III. Adult male and female "anopheles" and "culex" mosquitoes ... IA » » i> IV. The larva of A maculipalpis ... ... ... 35 V. „ larvae „ A. barbirostris and A. fuliginosus ... „ „ 78 VI. „ „ „ A. rossi and A. stephensi .. ... )t }) 37 VII. „ „ „ A. listoni and A. jeyporiensis ... „ „ n 1Q3 VIII. „ „ „ A. culicifacies and A. turkhudi ... „ „ „ 108 IX. Microphotographs of wing scales ... ... „ „ n HO X- ,, ,, „ ,, ... ... „ „ M 113 Map of India showing the distribution of some species of " ano- pheles " mosquitoes ... ... ... ... J} „ M 41 Diagrammatic drawing of the chief characters of A. leucophyrus „ „ „ 83 „ „ „ „ „ „ „ A. punctulatus „ „ „ 85 „ „ „ „ „ „ A, karwari ... „ „ „ 89 ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, A. aitkem ... ,, ,, ,, 120 ,, ,, „ ,, larva of A. culiciformis „ ,, ,, 122 List of illustrations. FIGURES IN THE TEXT. Fig. 1. Eggs of mosquitoes of the genera Panoplites, Stegomyia and Psoro- phora ... ... ... 7 2. Larvae of Chironomus, Ephemera and Corethra ... ... H 3. Different forms of scales ... ... ... ... 16 4. To show the method of mounting a mosquito ... ... 26 5- „ „ „ ,, „ preserving mosquitoes in tubes ... ... 27 6. ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, examining mosquitoes ... ... 28 7. ,, „ „ ,, ,, keeping mosquitoes alive in bottles ... 38 8. Eggs of " anopheles " mosquitoes ... ... ... 39 9. Chart showing the seasonal prevalence of A. culicifacies and A. rossi in the Punjab ... ... ... ... ... 43 10. Plan of Royal Artillery lines in Mian Mir to show breeding places of " anopheles " mosquitoes ... ... ... ... 50 11 Wing of A. leucophyrus ... ... ... ... 83 12. „ ,, A. karwari ... ... ... 90 PART I. MONOGRAPH OF TH'E ANOPHELES MOSQUITOES OP INDIA. CHAPTER I A GENERAL ACCOUNT OF MOSQUITOES I jEFORE commencing the study of any particular kind of mosquito it is necessary to know something of the general characters, life history, and structure of this important family of insects. Mosquitoes or gnats (Culicidce) belong to the order of insects known as Diptera. As is well-known, a typical member of the class Insecta has four wings, but it is characteristic of members of the order Diptera that the hinder pair of wings are so reduced in size as to form only small knobs called " balancers " or halter es, so that Diptera are often spoken of as " two- winged flies." Other important characteristics of members of this order are that they possess piercing and sucking mouth parts, and that they undergo complete " metamorphosis " — a term which is ex- plained by Glaus in the following manner :— " The more complete the agreement between the just-born young and the adult sexual animal so much the greater will be the duration of the embryonic development and the more complicated the developmental processes of the embryo. The post-embryonic development will, in this case, be confined to simple processes of growth. When, however, the embryo is born in an immature condition and at a relatively low state of organization, the post-embryonic development will be more complicated, and the young animal, in addition to its increase in size, will present various processes of transformation and change of form. In such cases the just-hatched young, as opposed to the adult animal, is called a Larva and develops gradually to the form of the adult sexual animal. The development of larvas, however, is by no means direct and uniform, but is compli- cated by the necessity for special contrivances to enable them to procure food and to protect themselves ; sometimes taking place in an entirely different medium, under different conditions of life. This kind of post-embryonic development is known as metamorphosis." The phenomena of metamorphosis are exceedingly well shown in the life history of frogs and in that of most insects. The differ- ent stages through which mosquitoes pass before they reach the [3 How to distinguish Mosquitoes from other Flies adult state may, for example, be briefly described in the following way:— The adult mosquito lays its eggs on the surface of water. The eggs float on the water for some days (two to four), after which time they hatch and permit of the escape of the larva. The larva is a free swimming, worm-like animal, which eats greedily and grows rapidly, casting its skin several times in the process, till it reaches its full development. At this stage it suddenly changes its form ; casting its skin, the worm -like larva assumes a comma shape, and so becomes the pupa or nympha. During the pupal period the insect ceases to eat ; profound anatomical changes take place within the pupal skin, whereby the masticatory mouth parts of the larva are converted into the suctorial apparatus of the adult insect or imago. After a certain number of days the pupa-case ruptures, and the adult insect is liberated, furnished with wings and legs adapted for a life in the air. The Diptera have been divided into two great groups, termed Orthorrhapha and ^yclorrhapha, according to the manner in which the pupa-case splits to permit of the escape of the perfect insect. In the Orthorrhapha, which includes the Culicidoe (mosquitoes), the ChironomidcB (midges), the Simulidce (sand-flies', the Cecidomyidce (gall-midges), the Mycetophilidce (fungus-midges), the Tipulidce (daddy-long-legs), the TabanidcB (horse-flies), etc., the pupa-case splits longitudinally down the median dorsal line. In the Cyclor- rhapha, which includes the Syrphidce (hoverflies), the Oestridce (bot-and warble flies), the Muscidce (houfee flies, tsetse flies, blue and green bottle flies, flesh flies, etc.), the perfect insect escapes by the splitting off of a cap from the head end of the pupa. The members of some of the above families are not infrequently mistaken for mosquitoes, especially the ChironomidcB or midges, the Cecidomyidce or gall-midges, the Tipulidce, the Simulidce, and the Psychodidce or owl-midges. Mosquitoes may, however, be easily distinguished from any other flies by the following characters : — (1) They possess a long sucking proboscis.* (2) The veins on their wings are covered with scales. (3) The arrangement of their wing-veins is characteristic and different from that of the members of any other family. * Except in the genera Corethra and MocJilonyx. 4] Mr. Theobald's Classification of Mosquitoes The Chironomidce or midges have neither a long sucking pro- boscis nor scaly wings. The Cecidomyidce or gall-midges have the body and wings covered with hairs, not scales, and the venation of the wings is simple, no fork-cells being present. The Psychodidce or owl-midges have the wings densely covered with hairs, not scales. The Simulidce, Tipulidce, etc., have the wing-veins bare, without hairs or scales. There is really no difficulty, therefore, in distinguishing mos- quitoes from other flies which seem to resemble them. \ The family Culicidce is divided, for the purposes of classification, into a number of sub-families, genera, and species. Up to the present, entomologists have based these subdivisions entirely upon differences in the adult insects, but there are good reasons for thinking that differences between mosquitoes in the larval or imma- ture stages of their existence are also of great importance for the purposes of classification and identification. The larvae of only a few species are, however, accurately known, and at present we must be content to follow, at any rate in the main, the somewhat unscientific methods of classification adopted by entomologists. Mr. F. V. Theobald, who is the greatest authority upon mosquitoes, divides them into the following sub-families : — 1. The Anophelina containing at present 11 genera and about 80 species. 2. The Megarhinina „ ,, „ 2 „ ,, ,, 20 ,, 3. The Culicina „ „ .„ 17 „ „ numerous „ 4. The Joblotina „ „ „ 1 genus „ 1 5. The Heptaphlebomyina,, „ ,, 1 » >» 1 » 6. The Aedeomyina „ „ „ 20 genera „ about 55 7. The Corethrina „ ., ,, 2 ,, ,, ,, 18 ,, The characteristics of the adult insects upon which these sub- families are based are as follow : — 1. Palpi long in both sexes ; about as long as proboscis Anophehna. •2. Palpi long in both sexes ; shorter than the proboscis in the female ; proboscis long and bent ... Megarhinina. 3. Palpi long in the male, very short in the female ... Culicina. 4. Palpi as in Culicina. Seven instead of six longitudi- nal veins on the wings ... ••• Heptaphlebomyina. 5 Palpi as in Culicina. Metanotum with hairs and scales Joblotina. [5 Stages of Metamorphosis : the Egg 6. Palpi very short in both sexes ... ... Aedeomyina. 1. Proboscis short and not formed for piercing .. Corethrina. Many of these sub-families are of importance to the worker on tropical diseases only in so far that some knowledge of their characteristics is essential to enable him to distinguish them from the mosquitoes which he especially desires to study. The Megar- hinincB are rare and cannot easily be confused with any other mem- bers of the Culicidce on account of their large size, brilliant colour, and long curved proboscis. The greater number of species have also a curious caudal tuft of brilliantly coloured hair-like scales at the end of the abdomen on each side. The Aedeomyince and Core- thrince are at present of no importance from a pathological point of view ; the former are easily recognised by their very short palpi in both sexes, and the latter by their very short non-piercing pro- boscis which somewhat resembles that of the Tabanidce or gad- o flies. The Heptaphlebomyince and JoUotince may, for all practical purposes, be considered as belonging to the Culicinae. Each of these sub-families contains but one species, which, in the case of Heptaphlebomyina, was placed in a distinct sub-family because it had seven longitudinal wing veins instead of six, and in the case of Joblotina because the metanotum carried hairs and scales. By far the most important of the sub-families are the Ano- phelina and the Culicina, which contain all the species of mosqui- toes known to be connected with the transmission of disease. In the former sub-family are included all the mosquitoes usually known as "anopheles," and in the latter most of those usually known as " culex." In fact, for the student of tropical medicine, no very ela- borate classification of the family Culicidce is necessary or advisable, and a knowledge of the differences between the two groups " Culex" and " Anopheles," together with a knowledge of the more important characteristics of a few of the genera included in the sub-family Oulicina are all that are essential before the task of the identifi- cation of individual species is commenced. These points will be referred to in the following more detailed account of the different stages in the metamorphosis of mosquitoes. THE EGG OR OVUM The eggs of most "culex" mosquitoes, before being deposited by the female, are collected together, in the angle made by the crossing 61 PLATE I. FII;. 1. I Fir;. 4 I- ir,. (5. FIG. 7. Ftc. 8. Tail of Culex Larva Fro. 9. PLATE I. Fig. 1.—" Anopheles" eggs. Natural size: Fifir. 2. -Egg of A. roisi, magnified, showing the upper surfac°, the lateral floats, and the beaded rim ; Kg. 3.— Lateral view of the same ; Fig. It.— Raft-like masses of " Culex " eggs, natural size ; Fig. fi.—H. raft mass of " Culex " eggs, magnified ; seen from above ; Fig. 6. — Lateral view of the same ; Fig. 7.— Four " Culex " eggs, greatly magnified ; Firj. 8.— Posterior extremity of " Anopheles " larva showing sessile stigmatic apparatus and " palmate hairs" • Fig. .9.— Posterior extremity of " Culex" larva. The Eggs of " Culex " and " Anopheles " of the insect's hind legs, so as to form an elongated boat-shaped mass consisting of several hundred eggs joined to one another by their edges. When this egg-boat or egg-raft has been constructed the insect allows it to drop into the water, where it floats as a small oblong boat-shaped body somewhat raised at each extremity (PI. I., Figs. 4, 5, 6). The shape and character of these egg-rafts vary in different genera. In the genus Culex (sub-family Culicina) they are broad and more or less oval in shape ; in the genus Tcenior- hynchus (sub-family Culicina} they are said to be very elongated and to resemble a racing skiff in shape (Stephens and Christo- phers) ; in the genus Coreihra (sub-family Corethrina), the eggs are collected together in flat, round, jelly-like masses. The eggs of all " anopheles " mosquitoes, on the other hand, as well as those of a few " oule* " moquitoes (viz., those of the genera Stegomyict, Panoplites, Psorophora and Janthinsoma of the sub-family Culicina) are not collected together into a mass of defi- nite shape before deposition. The reason of this is that the indivi- dual eggs do not stick together, so that when laid on a solid object they form only a piled up mass, and when laid on water they quickly separate from one another and float as isolated elements (PI. I, Fig 1 ). Owing to physical causes, the eggs, when deposited on water, may arrange themselves in fairly definite star-shaped pat- terns or in rows, but more frequently they are scattered irregularly over the surface of the water. The individual eggs which compose an egg-raft of " culex " mosquitoes, are oblong in shape, and broader and more , -.->, Fig. 1 {after Daniels). rounded at one end than at the other ( PI. I, Fig 7). When joined together to form the raft they lie verti- cally with the narrow end out of the water and the broad end — from which the larva escapes — submerged. The eggs of mosquitoes of the genus Panoplites (Fig. la) have one end terminating in a fine point ( Daniels), and those of the genera Stegomyia and Psorophora (Fig. 1, I & c) are peculiar in that, besides being more or less oval in shape, they possess a rim of cells, somewhat resembling the rim or frill present in " anopheles " eggs. [7 The Larva A typical " anopheles" egg (PL I, Figs. 2, 3) is a boat-shaped body about 07 to I'O mm. in length. The upper surface or " deck " is flattened, but slightly convex, and is surrounded by a narrow beaded rim or frill. One end of the egg is slightly deeper and fuller than the other, and it is toward this end that the head of the embryo is directed. Along the centre of each side of the egg is attached an oval ribbed air-containing " float" ( see also Fig 8). These floats are very characteristic structures and are not present in the eggs of any other kind of mosquito as yet described. Their shape and position differ in the eggs of different species of " anopheles," as does also the width and extent of the beaded rim or frill already described, and Stephens and Christophers have shown that it is possible to distinguish the eggs of some species by the position and characters of these two structures. These distinctions between the eggs of the various species will be described later. THE LARVA The larvae of all mosquitoes are made up of three regions : (1 ) the head, (2) the thorax, and (3) the abdomen. The shape and characteristics of these three regions differ in the various sub- fami- lies, genera and even species of mosquitoes, but the characters of the abdomen afford the readiest means of distinguishing between the main groups and must therefore be described first. The abdo- men of all mosquito larvae is divided into nine segments. The first seven segments closely resemble one another and need not be spe- cially described. The eighth segment carries the external openings of the respiratory tubes or trachece, by means of which oxygen is supplied to the tissues of the larva. In all " anopheles " larvae the two large tracheae open directly on the upper surface of the eighth segment by two stigmata which are surrounded and supported by a complex apparatus (PI. I, Fig. 8). In "culex" larvae, on the other hand, the respiratory tubes do not open directly at the surface of the segment, but are prolonged onwards into a projection from the segment known as the siphon tube (PI. I, Fig. 9). The absence of a siphon tube in " anopheles " larvae renders their recognition from among the larvae of all other kinds of mosquitoes an easy matter. For the identification of the different kinds of " culex " larva? the length and character of the siphon tube are of great value. Thus 8] PLATE II. ^'Yii.tura.l size. '•{£ Position of Culex in water f i i t-m • nkuSh •> -;• ; ~-"-^ _"~* *= - Enlc. JEnla.rq&d- FIG. \. Position, of Anopheles in. Wetter- Fio. -p size Fin. 3. FIQ. 4. PLATE II. Fig. 1. — Larva of " Culex," showing the position at the surface of the water ; .Figr. 2. — Larva of "Anopheles," showing the same ; Fig. Pupa of "Culex" ; Fig. It.— Pupa of "Anopheles. " The Larva of " G2ilex " and " Anopheles' in larva? of the genus Stegomyia the siphon tube is very short and thick, and in those of the genus Culex it is long and thin. Ste- phens and Christophers employ the term " siphoriic index " for the figure obtained by dividing the length of the siphon tube by its greatest breadth, and state that for the different species in any genus this figure is very constant. In Stegomyia larvae, for ex- ample, the siphonic index is about 2, i.e., the length of the tube is about double its greatest breadth, in Culex larva? it is about 4, and in Tceniorhynchus larvae it may be as much as 13. The ninth abdominal segment is cylindrical in shape and carries the opening of the anus, around which are symmetrically arranged the four anal papilla?. On the dorso-lateral surface of certain of the abdominal segments of " anopheles " larva? characteristic structures called " Palmate hairs " are present (see PI. IV). Each of these hairs has a short stalk, to the apex of which are jointed a number of leaflets, which, when spread out, are arranged somewhat like the ribs of an umbrella which has been turned slightly inside out, or perhaps more nearly like the leaf of a cocoanut palm. Two of these palmate hairs are present on each segment which is provided with them, and it is chiefly by their means that the larva main- tains its position close under the surface of the water. They are not present on the larvae of any other kind of mosquito than " anopheles." On account of their presence and on account of the absence of a siphon tube " anopheles " larva? float in the water immediately beneath and parallel with the surface film ( PL II, Fig. 2). On account of the presence of a siphon tube and the absence of palmate hairs " culex " larva? float considerably below and at an angle with the surface film (PI. II, Fig. 1 ). These are the essential differences by which " anopheles " and " culex " larva? may be distinguished from each other, and it is un- necessary to describe in detail the differences between any other regions of the larva? of these two kinds of mosquitoes. The head of an " anopheles " larva (PI. IV) is more or less rounded in shape and is covered by a clearly defined chitinous case. The eyes are situated laterally, and in front of each eye is an eminence which carries the antenna. A broad band of pigment runs across the head between the two eminences from which the antenna? arise, and [9 Some important larval hairs this carries six branched hairs which project forward over the head (see PL IV). Arising from the corner of each eminence, and situated just outside the most external of the six hairs just mentioned, is a characteristic hair that we have called the " Basal hair. " It is seen projecting forwards just outside and parallel to the antenna in Plate VII, fig. .2, A, and in the figures of the larvae of A. karwari, A. culiciformis, &c. It differs in character in different species and is of value in the identification of larvae. The anterior median area of the head is called the clypeus, and it carries on each side a large bunch of hairs called the whorl organs or " feeding brushes. " Lying directly over each whorl organ is a hair which may be called the external frontal hair or external clypeal hair, and between the whorl organs of each side is a pair of hairs close together which may be called the median frontal or clypeal hairs. These four frontal or clypeal hairs project beyond the head and may be simple or branched. They are of great service in the identifi- cation of the larvae of different species and will be more particularly referred to later. In some larvae, e. g., A. turkhudi and A. jeypori- ensis a third hair called the " Posterior hair, " arises from the clypeus just behind and between the two frontal hairs of each side. This hair is also of some service in identification. It is shown in Plate VII, fig. 2, and in Plate VIII, fig. 2. The sides of the mouth are formed by the mandibles, and its floor by the maxillae. Each mandible carries a number of stout teeth, which, working in con- junction with those of the mandible of the opposite side, serve to crush the food. In full-grown larvae the thorax is broader than the head or than any of the abdominal segments ( PL IV). It carries a number of branched hairs, and in some species a pair of well-developed palmate hairs similar to those present on the abdominal segments can be easily seen. A few words may be added regarding the movements of larva? in water and their method of feeding. " Anopheles " larvae change their position at the surface of the water by a series of very characteristic jerking, darting movements in a backward direction. When actually occupied in feeding they lie stationary beneath the surface film, only their mouth parts moving. " Culex " larvae do not dart along at the surface in a backward direction as " anopheles " 10] Movements in water and method of feeding larvae do, but when engaged in feeding they are propelled slowly forwards by the action of their mouth parts alone. Both kinds of larvae, when disturbed, usually wriggle rapidly to the bottom of the pool, where they lie motionless with their bodies extended. " Ano- pheles " larvae sometimes do not wriggle to the bottom, but simply extend their bodies and allow themselves to sink by virtue of their weight. When rising to the surface the movements of these larvae are much more jerky than those of " culex." " Anopheles " larvae feed just beneath the surface film, and, whilst feeding, the head is rotated so that its ventral surface lies uppermost, though the body of the larva remains in its Fig. 2. original position. This rotation of the head is very character- istic and is peculiar to the larvae of this kind of mosquito. " Culex " larvae often feed at the bottom of a pool, moving along 7 ~he Larva of Chironomus, Ephemera, and Dixa in their natural position and picking up stray bits of food of all kinds. The larvae of other flies than mosquitoes are often met with in water nnd may sometimes be mistaken for mosquito larvae. The commonest are the larvae of the flies called Chironomus, EpJiemera and Dixa. Chironomus larvae are often found in large numbers when the mud at the bottom of a small pool is stirred up. They are bright red worm -like creatures and are commonly known as " blood worms." Although their tracheae open externally in a pair of " respiratory tubes " ( fig. 2 D, d) in appearance they bear no resemblance to mosquito larvae. The larvae of ephemeral flies differ essentially from those of mosquitoes in that their air-tubes do not open externally, so that they obtain the oxygen they re- quire from the water by means of gills, the presence of which makes them very easily recognisable (fig. 2 A & B. It should also be noted that in Corethera larvae (fig. 2, C.) there is no direct communication of the air-tubes with the external air. The larvae of this kind of mosquito are very transparent, and are called for that reason " Phantom larvae." The head is much smaller than that of any other mosquito larvae. There are four distinct res- piratory sacs which do not, however, contain air. The larvae have no spiracles and, except when nearly full grown, no air-tubes. The four air-sacs simply act as floats, and at no period of larval life is there any direct communication with the external air. It will be seen therefore that these larvae are very different from other mos- quito larvse, and it is doubtful whether the ( *orethrince should be classified with the true mosquitoes, Dixa larvae bear a superficial resemblance to " anopheles " larvae and float just beneath the surface film as the latter do. The fact that all the segments of Dixa larvae are almost equal in size, the fact that they have no palmate hairs, and that they possess four prolegs, by using which they creep up the side of the vessel in which they are placed, should prevent any difficulty being experienced in distinguishing these larvae from those of " anopheles." THE PUPA OB NYMPH The pupae of mosquitoes are active creatures, rising and falling in the water at will. Unlike the larvae, they can sink in the water 12] The Pupa and the Imago only by violent exertions with their tails. As soon as these move- ments of the tail cease, the buoyant pupa floats up to the surface again. Like the larvae, they breathe air through protruding spiracles ; but these air tubes, instead of being at the tail end, as in the larva, are placed on the dorsum of the thorax, as two trumpet-shaped structures, projecting like horns. (PL II, figs. 3, 4. ) The length and shape of these spiracles enable " anopheles " pupae to be distinguished from those of " culex." " Anopheles " pupae have short, stumpy, funnel-shaped spiracles (PI. II, fig. 4), while those of " culex " are longer, more slender, and trumpet-shaped (PI. II, fig. 3). THE ADULT MOSQUITO OR IMAGO The adult mosquito is divided into three regions: (ij the head, ( 2) the thorax, (3) the abdomen. To the head are attached sensory and suctorial appendages ; while to the thorax are attached the legs and wings. (See Descriptive Diagram of a female anopheles. Coloured plate No. I. ) The head is rounded and attached to the thorax by a narrow neck The portion of the head near the neck is called the nape. Above and in front of the nape is the occiput. In front of the occiput, and occupying the greater part of the antero- lateral portion of the head, are the two compound eyes. Immediately anterior to the eyes, on either side, arise the antennae, which are long, jointed structures covered with hairs. In the male the antennae are very prominent hairy organs (PL III, figs. 1,3); in the female they are less conspicuous and almost devoid of hairs. (PL III, figs. 2, 4). In front of the antennas will be noted a firm median chitinous prolongation, the " clypeus." Beneath the clypeus arise the mouth parts, which consist of seven pieces collectively termed the proboscis. The mouth parts are : — { 1 ) the upper lip, made up of labrum and epipharynx ; (2) & (3) two mandibles ; (4) & (5) two maxillae ; (6) the hypopharynx or tongue ; (7) the lower lip or labium. The labium is a grooved structure, within which the other six mouth parts are enclosed. [13 The Head, Thorax, and Abdomen Attached to the maxillae are two maxillary palpi. The palpi of " anopheles " mosquitoes are very prominent organs, as long as the proboscis in both sexes, and clubbed at their extremity in the males. (PI. Ill, figs. 3, 4). The palpi are less prominent organs in the genera Culex, Stegomyia, Panoplites, etc., except in the case of the males, in which they are even longer than the proboscis, but in the females of these genera they are rather minute structures, just visible to the naked eye. (PL III, figs. 1, 2). The thorax is mainly composed of the middle division or mesothorax ; it is large and convex. Behind the main part of the thorax, a prominent ridge runs between the bases of the wings ; this ridge is called the " scutellum." Posterior to the scutellum, a horse shoe-shaped area is seen ; this is the " metanotum." Projecting laterally, behind the metanotum, the club-shaped halteres will be noted. The abdomen is more slender than the thorax, and consists of nine segments : eight of these are easily seen, each segment being composed of a dorsal plate or tergum, and a ventral plate or sternum, joined together by a soft membrane. The anus opens on the ventral surface of the eighth segment, while the genital opening is on the ninth segment, and to this segment are attached the genital ia. Attached to the under-surface of the thorax are the six legs, three on each side (anterior, middle, and posterior pairs of legs). Each leg consists of the following parts : — Two small segments, the coxa and trochanter (these cannot be seen from the dorsal aspect), two longer segments, the femur and tibia, and, lastly, five tarsal segments. The first tarsal segment is sometimes called the metatarsus. Between the tarsal segments are the tarsal joints. The wings of mosquitoes are mapped out with veins which are covered with scales. These veins have a very definite arrangement, and a knowledge of the names applied to them is essential in dis- tinguishing the different species.* The external or anterior border of the wing is called the costa. Running parallel with the costa is the first longitudinal vein. • * The reader will be greatly helped by following these veins as well as other structures noted, on the descriptive diagram of a female anopheles (coloured plate No. I). H] PLATE 111. rr~ Fio. 2 Fin. 4. Fie. 5 Fio. 6. 7/7. Fig 1.— Head of a male " Culex " ; Fig. 2.— Head of a female " Culex " ; fig. 3.— Head of a male " Anopheles " ; Fig. It.— Head of a female "Anopheles" ; fig. 5.—\ female "Culex," showing the position usually assumed when at rest on a surface,- Fig. 6.— A female,, Anopheles, showing the position usually assximed when at rest on a surface. Wing 'venation Immediately behind and arising about the junction of the inner with the middle third of this vein is the second longitudinal vein. After completing about half of its course this vein divides into two branches, the anterior and posterior branches of the second longi- tudinal vein. Behind the second longitudinal vein and arising about the middle of the wing is the third longitudinal vein. The fourth longitudinal vein arises at the base of the wing, and in the last quarter of its course divides into two branches, anterior and posterior. The fifth longitudinal vein also arises from the base of the wing ; at about the middle of its course it divides into two branches, anterior and posterior. The sixth longitudinal vein is unbranched, arises from the base of the wing, and terminates about the middle of the posterior border of the wing. Joining these longitudinal veins with one another are certain transverse veins. The most important of these transverse veins is the " the sub-costal " which, arising near the origin of the first longitudinal vein, passes obliquely forwards and outwards to meet the costa about the beginning of the outer third of its course. This is the only transverse vein which is covered with scales. Joining the first long vein to the origin of the second long vein is a very short transverse vein, " the marginal transverse vein." Joining the origin of the third long vein to the second long vein is " the super-numerary cross vein." The vein joining the third long vein to the fourth long vein is the " mid cross vein." The vein joining the fourth long vein to the anterior branch of the fifth long vein is called " the posterior cross vein." The first, third, and sixth longitudinal veins are unbranched. The second, fourth, and fifth long veins divide in their course into two branches. The areas enclosed between these branches have received names. The area enclosed between the branches of the second long vein is called "the first submarginal cell"; that between the branches of the fourth long vein, " the second posterior cell," and that between the branches of the fifth long vein, " the anal cell. " Names have been applied to the other areas of the wing [15 Scale Structure enclosed between the various veins, but for our present purpose they need not be mentioned. The posterior margin of the wing is always fringed with long scales, " the wing fringe." No account of the characters of mosquitoes would be complete without some remarks on scale structure, the importance of which has been very ably demonstrated by Mr. Theobald.* Head scales. — Some or all of the following forms of scales may be found on the head of a mosquito : — 1. ''Upright forked scales" (fig. 3, 2) are found chiefly towards the nape. These scales have long stalks with an expanded fan -like head, the angles of which project outwards like the prongs of a fork. They stand out from the surface upon which they are inserted. 2. " Narrow curved scales" (fig. 3, 3, are long curved scales tapering to their extremities ; the body of the scale is expanded at its widest part to from ^ to ^ of the length of the scale. These scales are chiefly found projecting from the occiput. 3. "Flat scales" (fig. 3,1) have a narrow pointed base; the body of the scale rapidly expands from the base. The extremity of the scale is broad, with a flat or slightly convex edge. These scales, in contrast to the scales mentioned above, lie closely applied to the sur- face from which they arise and over- lie one another like the slates on a roof. They are found on the dorso-lateral surface of the head. Thoracic scales. — Five forms of thoracic scales are described by Mr. Theobald. 1. Narrow hair-like curved scales ^fig. 3, 4) 2. Narrow curved scales (fig. 3, 3 ). * "A monograph of the Oulicidae of the world" by Fred. V. Theobald, M.A., F.E.S., British Museum (Natural History), Vols. I & II, 1901 ; Vol. Ill, 1903. Fig. 3. Scales on the Abdomen, Wings, Halteres, &c. 3. Spindle-shaped scales (figs. 3, 6). 4. Flat scales similar to those on the head (figs. 3, 1). 5. Long twisted scales (figs. 3, 8). Abdominal scales. — In all " culex " mosquitoes and in one " anopheles " mosquito (Aldrichia error, Theobald) the abdomen is covered with overlapping flat scales. In some " anopheles " there are no scales on the abdomen, in others a few small flat scales occur in patches, and in others the abdomen is densely covered with scales of various forms. Wing scales. — In all mosquitoes the veins of the wings are covered with scales which vary in shape and size in different parts of the same wing, Mr. Theobald describes the following forms as occurring on the wings of " anopheles " mosquitoes : 1, lanceolate (figs, 3, 9) ; 2, long and narrow ; 3, large and inflated. On the wings of other kinds of mosquitoes some of the scales may be very large, flat and much expanded (Panoplites figs. 3, 5) ; broad and asymmetrical (Aedeomyia ) ; parti-coloured and pyriform or inflated (Mucidus) ; or broad and elongated ( Tceniorhynchus). Leg scales. — In nearly all mosquitoes the legs are clothed evenly writh flat scales, which form a complete covering. In a few cases hair-like scales, which occur in tufts, may be present, as in Sabethes. Scales on the proboscis, palpi, and antennas. — The scales on the proboscis are usually small and flat, but in some " anopheles " they stand out very distinctly at an "angle to the surface (A. sinensis, dc.). The palpi in some mosquitoes may also be densely scaled, as well as the basal and first two or three of the following segments. Scales on the halteres. — Mr. Theobald makes no mention of scales being present on these structures, but their presence and character can be readily made out in most species of " anopheles." In the classification of mosquitoes Mr. Theobald relies almost entirely upon scale structure for the distinctions between different genera, and in one case he has used this character alone for the formation of a sub-family (Joblotina). The genus Stegomyia was separated from the old genus Culex by reason of the fact that only two forms of scales, viz., upright forked and flat scales, are present Mr. Theobalds new Classification of " Anopheles " on the heads of members of this genus, instead of the three kinds usually found on the heads of most other "culex" mosquitoes ; and the genera Panoplites ( = Mansonia), Tceniorhynchus and others by reason of their peculiarly shaped wing scales. Mr. Theobald has recently adopted a new classification of " anopheles" mosquitoes based almost entirely on scale structure, in which he divides these mosquitoes under 11 new genera as follows : — Genus 1. Anopheles. Meigen. „ 2. Myzomyia. Blanchard. „ 3. Cydoleppteron. Theobald. „ 4. Stethomyia. Theobald. „ 5. Pyretophorus. Blanchard. „ 6. Arribahagia, Nov. gen. „ 7. Myzorhynchus. Blanchard. ,, 8. Nyssorhynckus. Blanchard. „ 9. Cellia. Theobald. . ,, 10. Aldrichia Theobald. ,, 11 Christia. Theobald. The characters upon which these new genera are founded may be tabulated thus :— SUB-FAMILY ANOPHELINA. Thorax and abdo- men with hair- like curved scales. Thorax with narrow curved .scales; abdomen hairy. Prothoracic lobes simple ; no flat head scales. Prothoracic lobes mammilated : me- dian flat scales. Wing scales lanceolate... Anopheles. Wing scales mostly long and narrow ... Myzomyia. Wing scales partly large and inflated ... Cydoleppteron. Wing scales lanceolate Stethomyia. Wing scales small, lan- ceolate or narrowed . . . Pyretophorus. Thorax with hair-like curved scales ; some narrow curved ones in front ; abdomen with apical lateral scale tufts and scaly venter, no ventral tuft Arribalzagia. Thorax with hair-like curved scales ; abdominal scales on venter only, with a distinct ventral apical tuft; no lateral tufts ... Myzorhynchus. 18] Thorax and abdo- men with true scales. Some objections to it. SUB-FAMILY ANOPHELINA.— (contd.) Abdominal scales as lateral tufts and dorsal patches of small flat scales ; thoracic narrow curved or spindle-shaped ... Nyssorhynchus. Abdomen nearly completely scaled with irre- gular scales and with lateral tufts ... Cellia. Abdomen completely scaled with large flat scales as in Gulex ... Aldrichia. The Indian species of " anopheles " described by Mr. Theobald are placed by him in the following of these new genera. In the genus Anopheles (1) lindesayi, Giles ; (2) gigas, Giles ; (3) aitkeni, James ; (4) immaculatus, Theobald. In the genus Myzomyia (1) rossi, Giles ; (2) culicifacies, Giles ; (3) Ustoni, Listen ; (4) turkhudi, Liston ; (5) leucophyrus, Donitz ; (6) elegans, James. In the genus Pyretophorus (1 ) jeyporiensis n. sp. In the genus Myzorhynchus (1) sinensis, Wiedmann ; (2) nigerri- mus, Giles; (3) indiensis, Theobald; (4) barbirostris, Van der Wulp ; (5) minutus, Theobald. In the genus Nyssorhynchus (1) maculatus, Theobald ; (2) ful- ginosus, Giles; (3) jamesi, Theobald; (4) theobaldi, Giles; (5) stephensi, Liston; (6) willmori, James; (7) maculipalpis, Giles; (8) karwari, James. In the genus Cellia (1) pulcherrimus, Theobald. We have given this short account of Mr. Theobald's method of classifying " anopheles," for purposes of reference rather than because we agree that it is the best method by which these insects may be arranged. Omitting any consideration of the result of the new classification, viz., that if it is adopted it will be necessary to say that malaria is transmitted not only by mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles but also by those of the genera Myzomyia, Pyretophorus, Nyssorhynchus, etc., — for in spite of their new names the members of these new genera still remain malaria carriers — we may enumerate some of the more obvious objections to the method, 1. The fact that the scale structure of one species of "ano- pheles" (Aldrichia error, Theobald) is apparently similar Some more objections. to that of some " culex " mosquitoes, appears to show that generic distinctions cannot be based upon scale structure alone. 2. The classification is based in great part on the shape, and not upon the presence or absence, of scales. Scales of various shapes are present on different parts of the thorax, abdomen, and especially the wings of "anopheles," and it is a matter of great difficulty to decide in some instances what form of scale predominates ; nor does Mr. Theobald give us any indication of what portion of a wing, for example, should be examined to decide this point. 3. The terms " lanceolate," " long and narrow," " true scales," &c., are not sufficiently definite to permit of such scales being easily distinguished from one another — except perhaps by Mr. Theobald himself. It is obvious that the distinction between " hair-like curved scales " and " narrow curved scales " is not great, and also that it would be difficult to decide whether the abdomen is " hairy," or whether it is covered with " hair-like scales" which apparently resemble hairs so closely that they cannot be termed " true scales." As regards the wing again it would certainly be difficult to decide whether most of the scales were " lanceolate " or whether they were " mostly long and narrow " especially as the part of the wing to be examined is not stated, but on this decision alone depends the distinction between the genera Anopheles and Myzcmyia. 4. One of the objects of classification is to simplify the identi- fication of species, but the new classification does not aid this in any way. In practice, it will be found much easier to determine the specific name of any specimen of " anopheles " than its generic name according to the new system. 5. Species which differ widely in their habits and patho- logical significance (e. g., rossi and culicifacies) are placed in the same genus, while those which are similar in these important respects (e. g., listoni and jeyporiensis} are placed in different genera. 20] Some more objections. 6. Species of which the eggs and larvae — the characters of which are at least as important as the shape of the wing scales in the adult insect— are essentially different (e. g., culicifacies and turkhudi) are placed in the same genus, while those with eggs and larvae of the same type are placed in different genera. 7. The distinctions between the different genera are not of equal value, for whereas gigas and rossi, for example, are placed in different genera because in the one case the wing scales are " lanceolate," while in the other they are " mostly long and narrow," the fact that the abdomen of stephensi is densely covered with scales, while that of maculatus is, practically speaking, entirely free from them, is not considered sufficient to warrant these two species being placed in different genera. The same argument may be used with reference to willmori and some of the other species in the genus Nyssorhynchus. It appears to us, therefore, that while differences in scale struc- ture are undoubtedly of great value in the distinction of species, such differences as are present — at any rate among "anopheles" — are not sufficiently important to be considered of generic value, and it is for this reason that we have retained the generic term anopheles for all the species described in this book. In a later chapter we shall refer to this subject in more detail, and give our own method of classifying these insects, but before doing so we must describe the methods by which they may be caught, examined, and identified. 21 CHAPTER II. THE COLLECTION, MOUNTING, EXAMINATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF ANOPHELES MOSQUITOES AND THEIR LARVAE. recording observations on the habits and life-history of " anopheles " there has been, until recently, a tendency to apply the facts deduced from observa- tions of one species only, to the whole sub-family, without taking into account the fact that different species may vary greatly in their habits and life-history. At the present time, however, it is extremely important to study each species of " anopheles " separately, and it is desirable, therefore, to give briefly some methods that have been found successful for the collection of the adults and larvae, in order that those who are interested in the subject may find and separate the various species present in their districts before commencing a study of their habits and life-history. The collection of adult Anopheles. — The collection of the so- called "domestic" species — that is, those species which are never found far from the neighbourhood of human habitations — is, as a rule, an easy matter in India provided search for them is made in the right places. The majority of the known species rest during the day-time in houses, stables, and sheds, and in such haunts they may be easily captured by gently placing the open mouth of a test-tube over them as they rest on the walls or roof. A slight movement of the tube while it is kept pressed against the wall or roof will rouse the mosquito and make it fly towards the closed end of the tube, the mouth of which can then be closed by insinuating a cotton-wool plug between it and the wall or roof. Mosquitoes caught in this manner can either be kept in the test- tubes, or if a large number are required, as for the purpose of dissection, it is preferable to transfer them from the test-tubes into a large bottle with a narrow neck (such as an empty white glass 22] The Collection of Anopheles Mosquitoes wine bottle), so that the test-tubes can be used again. In this way if " anopheles " are at all plentiful, fifty or sixty can be caught in a very short time. But before commencing the search for adult mosquitoes of this kind it is advisable to carefully select a suitable place. A native village with breeding places near (such as a stream, or canal, or ponds) should be chosen if possible. In such a village there will probably be several old unoccupied huts and sheds, and it is in these a good catch is most likely to be made. It is almost useless to search in a new house with whitened walls. The best place of all is in old unoccupied house with smoke-blackened thatched roof and mud walls. It is better to look first in an unoccupied house, because the smoke from the wood fires in houses where people are living, drives most of the mosquitoes out during the day-time into the nearest empty house or shed. Cowsheds in the middle of a village, native carpenters' shops, wood sheds, and the barracks of native soldiers, are also good places in which, to search for " anopheles " mosquitoes. In houses with high roofs it may be necessary to mount on a ladder in order to very carefully examine each section of the thatch. The darker corners, the angles between the rafters and the thatch, and the cobwebs hanging from the roof, are favourite resting places of these mosquitoes. The commoner species, such as A. rossi, are usually seen at once, because they are light-coloured and large and stand out against the black background of sootlike little white thorns hanging from the roof, but the smaller darker coloured species are difficult to see. A. culicifacies, for example, hides most successfully in holes and corners of the roof, and in many places it would be possible to catch several hundred specimens of A. rossi in the time that it would take to catch fifteen or twenty specimens of this species. A difficulty also arises in collecting specimens of this very important species, from the fact that, as it does not assume the characteristic attitude of the majority of " anopheles " mosquitoes when resting on a wall or roof, it is very liable to be mistaken for a small brown "culex." For this reason, as well as for the reason that species of " anopheles " occur in India, the wings of which are entirely unspotted, it is advisable, in rooms which are badly lighted, to catch all the mosquitoes that are seen, without [23 Favorite haunts of the adults. taking note at the time whether they are " culex " or " anopheles." As each mosquito is caught, the tube containing it can be taken to the light, and the mosquito carefully examined before transferring it to the large bottle. In occupied houses and in barracks and hospitals, " anopheles " are more likely to be found on dark-coloured clothes hanging in the corners of the rooms or in the cupboards, or resting on the under- surface of the shelves which usually surround the walls of barrack- rooms. Saddles and harness of all kinds are also favorite resting places of this kind of mosquito, and in the harness rooms of the cavalry regiments at Mian Mir as many as twenty or thirty can often be seen resting on the under-surface of each saddle hanging up in the rooms. In stables and out-houses of Indian villages, it is usual for the natives to store a number of dried mud and straw cakes which are used for repairing their houses, and if one of these heaps of mud cakes is kicked over, a large number of "anopheles" will often fly out. In such a case as this a muslin net will be found very useful for catching the mosquitoes as they fly out. With one sweep of the net it is often possible to catch ten or twelve A. culicifacies after disturbing one of these heaps, when it may be difficult to find any specimens of this species resting on the walls or roofs of the houses. In addition to collecting the species which are commonly found in the neighbourhood of habitations, it is very important to search for those species which are seldom or never found in houses and which may be termed " wild " species of " anopheles. " They may sometimes be caught by the following method : — On a night when there is little or no wind a white sheet is hung near the ground under some trees, and a lighted lamp is placed on the ground in front of the sheet. The mosquitoes are attracted by the lamp and alight on the white sheet, when they may be caught by placing a test-tube over them in the usual way. Another plan is to erect a tent in the jungle or other place where we wish to search for these mosquitoes. After a day or two several will almost certainly be found in the corners of the tent and beneath the folds of its hangings. This method is of great service in villages where the inhabitants are unwilling to permit search being made in their houses. 24] The Collection of Larva The collection of larva. — The collection of adult mosquitoes should be supplemented by collecting the larvas, which may be kept and bred out into adult mosquitoes. On account of the fact that pools and streams frequently contain " anopheles " larvae when none can be seen on the surface of the water, the method of " dipping " should always be employed for their collection. One of the best things with which to dip for larvae is a large tin mug, but a calico or muslin net with a long handle is of advan- tage for fishing in the middle of a pool or stream. Besides the dipper and net, a number of wide-mouthed bottles should be taken when going out to search for larvse. When any collection of water is reached, the dipper should be scooped along the surface, under the grass or weed at the edge, and brought out full of water. If any larvae have been caught they can easily be recognised in the dipper when they rise to the surface, and they should then be transferred with some of the water and weed into one of the wide- mouthed bottles. In running streams care should be taken to dip several times in the eddies and beneath the grass overhanging the edge of the water, as in such places larvae are most likely to be found. The larvae from different breeding places should be kept in separate bottles, in order that when they have been bred out and identified, the character of the breeding places of the different species will be known. In searching for " anopheles " larvae, it is important to note that no collection of water should be passed over without careful examination, for it often happens that the most unlikely-looking collection of water will yield many larvae. Each wide-mouthed bottle should be half-filled with water from the pool or stream in which the larvas were taken. In some cases, — especially in the case of larvae collected from running streams — it is necessary to change the water daily if healthy larvae are to be reared. The mouths of the bottles are covered with fine muslin or mosquito netting, and allowed to stand in a warm place, but bright sunlight should be avoided if possible. Each day the adult mosquitoes which have developed from the larvae may be transferred to a clean dry bottle, in which they should be allowed to remain alive for one or two hours in order that they may attain [25 How to Mount Mosquitoes their proper colour and size. After this period they may be killed and mounted for examination. The mounting q/ Anopheles. — In making a collection of mosquitoes it is desirable to get as perfect specimens as possible, and for this reason the " anopheles " which have been caught or bred from larvae, should not be kept alive in the bottles longer than is necessary, lest by rubbing their wings against the glass when flying about, some of the scales may be rubbed off. The insects are best killed by dropping a few drops of chloroform on to the muslin covering the mouth of the bottle in which they are confined. Tobacco smoke should not be used for killing mosquitoes as it alters the colour of the markings. Immediately after the insects are dead, they should be turned out on to a clean sheet of cork carpet. If left too long exposed to the fumes of chloroform, the legs become fixed in awkward positions and brittle. Great care should be taken not to touch the insects with the fingers or some of the fine scales will be rubbed off, and if it is necessary to move any of them, a fine needle or pin should be used for the purpose. In order to mount mosquitoes the following articles are necessary : — 4*v (1) Fine entomological silver pins (No. 20 size). (2) A pair of forceps for holding the pins. (3) Common pins. (4) Small discs of thin cardboard such as are used for gun wads, the size of a 20-bore gun. (5) A wooden box, in the floor of which is fixed a layer of cork carpet or pith, into which the pins can be inserted and firmly fixed. A card-disc should be taken, and all the data con- cerning the specimen to be Fig.- 4 (After Theobald.) ° \ mounted, should be written upon it. Then one of the No. 20 pins should be firmly grasped 26] \ How to preserve them near its point with the forceps and thrust through the centre of the disc until about half its length projects through it. The mosquito, which is lying dead on the sheet of cork, should be turned on to its back with the aid of a pin, and, holding the head of the pin carrying the cardboard disc between the thumb and first finger of the right hand, the point of the pin is thrust into the thorax of the mosquito between the points of origin of the legs, and pressed onwards until it emerges through the dorsal surface of the thorax. When the pin and disc are lifted off the cork and inverted, the mosquito will be in its natural position, right side upwards. The wings and legs may now be carefully arranged with the aid of a fine pin, but this is often unnecessary, and if all the parts can be seen moderately well, it is best not to touch them, as even the most careful manipulation will rub off some of the scales and hairs. An ordinary pin is thrust through the card disc near its margin for the purpose of attaching it to the cork in the floor of the entomological box. (See Fig. 4). In India, mosquitoes very quickly become covered with mould, and in order to prevent this, and to preserve them properly, they are best kept in the small glass tubes shown in fig. 5. A flat cork (D) fitting very tightly is first pressed into the tube to its end. On this cork a small muslin bag (C) containing naphthalene is placed. This is kept in posi- tion by means of a cardboard disc perforated with holes (B) which is fastened firmly by pins to the cork in the bottom of the tube. The disc carrying the mosquito (A) is pinned to the cork which closes the mouth of the By this method mosquitoes may be tube. preserved in good condition for a long time, and if the tubes are well packed in a tin box Fis- 5< with cotton-wool, they may be sent through the post with safety. In addition to mounting male and female specimens of each species in the manner just described, it is necessary to have certain parts of each species mounted separately on glass slides. These [27 How to examine and describe an Anopheles parts are the wings, the male genitalia, and the male and female ungues (especially the ungues of the fore leg in the male). The wings are best mounted dry beneath a thin coverslip, which may be kept in place by strips of gummed paper or by ringing it with thick Canada balsam. The wings should, of course, be mounted perfectly flat. The male genital ia and the ungues should be mounted beneath thin coverslips in xylol balsam. The examination of adult Anopheles. — For the examination of adult mosquitoes a low power microscope (half or two-thirds inch objective) is necessary. The mosquito to be examined (which has already been mounted on a card-disc in the usual manner) is fixed by a pin thrust through the edge of the card-disc to a flat cork about an inch square. This piece of cork carrying the mosquito is placed on the microscope stage, and can be moved about at will (fig. 6). The angle at which the pin is fixed in the cork should be such that the part of the mosquito which is being exa- mined is always as nearly as possible parallel to the microscope stage. In order to be in a position to give a complete description of a mosquito, it is best to begin with an examination of the palpi, proboscis, arid antennas, and to work backwards, noting every marking and character that presents itself. The position of the disc carrying the mosquito will of course have to be frequently altered by removing the pin from the cork and readjusting it at a different angle. The character of the antennaa will at once show whether the mosquito is a male or female, and the length and characters of the palpi whether it is a "culex" or an "anopheles." (See PI. Ill, figs. 1 to 4.) In the examination of the palpi it will also be noted whether they are uniformly coloured or whether they are encircled with white bands, and the number, relative size, and posi- tion of any such bands will be described. (See coloured plates.) In 28] 6. The head, thorax, abdomen, and wings addition to definite bands a few white scaled patches may be present on one or more segments of the palpi as in A. maculipalpis and A. stephensi. Passing on to the examination of the head, the characters of the different groups of scales will be noted, and in particular the characters of the upright forked scales can be readily made out. In most species of " anopheles " a prominent tuft of white hairs project- ing forwards from the anterior end of the head will be seen. The thorax will next be examined, and on its dorsal surface a large number of scales and a few hairs will probably be present. The characters of these scales and hairs are of importance in identifica- tion and should be carefully described. Passing on towards the abdomen, the scutellum will be examined. In addition to the long bristles which will be readily seen attached to its border, the scutel- lum sometimes carries a few scales similar to those on the thorax. The bare horse-shoe shaped metanotum will next be seen, and then the halteres, the knobs of which are sometimes clothed with numer- ous small silvery scales. The examination of the abdomen is of great importance. In many species, although the abdomen is thickly covered with long hairs, no scales are present. In some species, however, it will be seen that in addition to the hairs covering the majority of the segments, a few golden-brown or dark-coloured scales can be made out, especially on the ventral surface of the last one or two segments only. In other species, again, it will be at once seen that the whole surface of the abdomen is thickly set with white or golden brown scales, which in some species are very broad (as in A. pulcherrimus), and in others more or less spindle -shaped (as in A. stephensi). It will readily be recognised that the presence or absence and the character of these abdominal scales is a very important aid in the determination of species. The wings and legs will next be examined. The most useful way of describing the wing markings is by means of a diagrammatic drawing giving the number and relative size and position of the different dark and light-scaled areas on each vein. The detailed shape of the wing scales, which is a point of some importance, and the relative position of the transverse veins must be noted by a separate examination of a wing mounted under a cover -glass. [29 The identification of species The legs should be examined in order, and a careful description of the markings on each leg, commencing with those on the femur and ending with those of the fifth tarsal segment, made. It will be seen that in many species complete bands of white scales encircle the legs near the joints, and the position and characters of these bands should be noted. In addition, small patches of white scales, not amounting to complete bands, will be found in some species on many of the segments of the legs ("speckling"), and in some species one or more of the terminal tarsal segments of the hind legs will be found to be white-scaled in their whole length. The description will be completed by an examination of the male genitalia and of the ungues (special note being taken of the characters of the fore ungues in the male), these structures being separately mounted on slides for this purpose. The Identification of adult Anopheles. — The identification of most of the Indian species of " anopheles " is not by any means a difficult matter if one sets about the task in a systematic way. We have just indicated the parts of a mosquito which must be examined in detail if it is desired to give a complete description of the insect, but for identification it is not, as a rule, necessary to examine all these structures minutely, and many of the Indian species can be readily identified by an examination with a hand- lens or even with the naked eye. The first requisite for the task of identification is the possession of a synoptic table such as the one given on page 32. This table is founded chiefly upon the markings of the palpi, which afford a satisfactory basis on which the Indian species may be divided, for purposes of identifica- tion, into a number of groups, such as "those with unhanded palpi," *' those with three white bands on the palpi," &c. These groups may be subdivided into smaller ones by the markings on the legs, as, for example, among the " three-banded palpi " group a sub-group containing the species in which one or more of the terminal segments of the hind legs are pure white, another sub-group containing the species in which, though none of the hind tarsal segments are pure white in their whole length, there are distinct white bands at the tarsal joints, and a third sub-group containing the species in which the legs are uniformly coloured without any distinct bands. Each of these sub-groups will be found to contain only a few species, 30] Palp markings as a basis for identification which may be easily distinguished from one another by other characteristic markings. When the probable name of the mosquito we are dealing with has been found out by means of the table the full description of the mosquito of this name may be turned up (in Part II of this monograph), and we can ascertain by a more thorough examination of all the markings, scale structure, &c., whether we have identified the insect correctly. In selecting the palp markings as the basis of the table of Indian species, we have been guided by the facts that they are less variable than the markings on the legs or wings, and that, whether as a result of coincidence or not, such an arrangement of the Indian species brings together into the same groups the species of which the habits and pathological significance are very similar. It should be noted that the markings of male mosquitoes vary so much that it is not advisable to use them for the identification of species and female specimens only should be employed. A few examples will serve to illustrate the method of using the table. Example I. — A MOUNTED MOSQUITO FOR IDENTIFICATION. Antennae. — With short, inconspicuous hairs at the joints (Plate III, Figs. 2 & 4), showing that the mosquito is a female. Palpi. — As long as the proboscis (Plate III, Fig. 4) showing that it is an " anopheles." Wings. — Spotted with dark and light scaled areas. The mosquito therefore comes under group I. Palpi. — With three white bands or rings, viz., one broad ring including the tips (which are therefore white) and two narrower ones. It therefore comes under the group C, sub-group 2. Legs. — None of the tarsal segments of the hind legs are white in their whole length, but there are distinct white bands at the tarsal joints (sub-group 6). The mosquito is therefore A. rossi or A. stephensi. The femora and tibiae are not speckled with white patches, and the abdomen is not covered with scales. Diagnosis. — A. rossi. Confirm by comparison of the wing and other markings with the coloured plate of A. rossi and with the description of that mosquito. [31 Table for the Identification of Anopheles I WINGS SPOTTED. A.— Palpi unbanded. 1. A. lindesayi (Giles) ... ... Wings with one large white spot near the apex. Femora of hind legs with a broad white band. 2. A. gigas (Giles) ... ... ... A large species with three creamy white spots on the costa. 3. A. barbirostrit (Van der wulp) ... A very large species with black densely-scaled palpi. Costa with two small light spots. B.— Palpi with four white bands. 1.— LEGS BANDED AND FEMORA AND TIBI.E SPECKLED WITH WHITE SPOTS. 4. A. pulcherrimus (Theobald) ... The third, fourth, and fifth hind tarsal segments white. Abdomen covered with scales. 5. A. elegant (James) ... ... None of the hind tarsal segments pure white. No scales on abdomen. A very broad band at the tibio-metatarsal joint of hind legs. 6. A. punctulatus (Donitz) ... ... No broad white band at tibio-raetatarsal joint. 2.— LEGS BANDED BUT FEMORA AND TIBIAE NOT SPECKLED. 7. A. OTrt«n*w (Wiedmann) and its allied species A. nigerrimus (Giles), &c. None of the hind tarsal segments pure white. 8. A. karwari (James) ... ... The fifth tarsal segment of the hind legs pure white. C — Palpi with three white bauds. 1.— TIPS OF PALPI BLACK. 9. A. turkhudi (Listen) ... ... None of the hind tarsal segments white. 10. A. nagpori (James) ... ... The fourth and fifth hind tarsal segments pure white. 2.— TIPS OF PALPI WHITE. (a) Tarsal joints banded and one or more of the hind tarsal segments white. 11. A. fuliginosus (Giles) ... ... The third, fourth and fifth hind tarsal segments pure white. Femora and tibiae not speckled. 12. A. jamesi (Theobald) ... ... As No. 11, but femora and tibiae speckled. 13. A. maculipalpis (Giles) ... ... As No. 12, but palpi have two broad and one narrow bands instead of one broad and two narrow ones, and the palpi as well as the legs are speckled. 14. A. theobaldi (Giles) ... ... Legs speckled, but only the 4th and 5th hind tarsal segments are pure white. 15. A. maeulatus (Theobald) ... ... Only the fifth hind tarsal segment is pure white. 16. A. willmori (James) ... ... Differs from No. 15, in having many scales on the abdomen. (6) Tarsal joints banded, but none of the hind tarsal segments white. 17. A. rosti (Giles) ... ... ... Femora and tibiae not speckled. 18. A. stephensi (Listen) ... ... Femora and tibia speckled. Abdomen covered with scales, (c) Legs uniformly coloured without distinct bands or white segments. 19. A. listoni (Listen) ... ... The third long vein of wing white scaled ; the sixth mostly dark scaled. Six white patches on wing fringe. 20. A. jeyporiensis (James) ... ... The third long vein of wing white scaled ; the sixth mostly light scaled. Seven white patches on wing fringe. 21. A. culicifacies (Giles) ... ... The third long vein of wing black scaled. Two white patches on wing fringe. II.— WINGS UNSPOTTED. A.— Palpi unbanded. 22. A. aitkeni (James). 23. A. culiciformit (Listen). B Palpi distinctly lighter coloured in their outer third. 24. A. immaculatus (Theobald). 32] Examples in Identification. Example II. — A FEMALE " ANOPHELES." Wings. — Spotted. Palpi. — With three white rings, the outermost of which includes the tips. The two outer rings are broad and the third narrow. In addition to the three complete rings there are one or two small patches of white scales which do not amount to a complete ring or band, on the upper surface of each palpus ; i.e., the palpi are marked with three bands and are " speckled " in addition. The mosquito comes under the group C, sub-group 2. Legs. — The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tarsal segments of the hind legs are pure white in their whole length. (NOTE. — It is sometimes rather difficult to determine by the naked eye or with a hand-lens the exact number of tarsal segments which are pure white, for the 5th segment is very short. The matter can easily be decided by an examination under a low power of the microscope.) The mosquito is therefore either A. fuliginosus, A. jamesi, or A. maculipalpis. The femora and tibiae are brilliantly speckled with white scales. This excludes A. fuliginosus, and the speckling of the palpi together with the fact that there are two broad and one narrow bands 011 the palpi, instead of one broad and two narrow ones, excludes A. jamesi, so that the diagnosis is A. maculipalpis. Confirm as for example I. Example III. — A FEMALE " ANOPHELES. " Wings. — Spotted. Palpi. — With three white rings, the outermost of which includes the tips. As in the other examples, the mosquito comes under the group C, sub-group 2. Legs. — Uniformly coloured without distinct bands at the tarsal joints. (NOTE. — In several of the unbanded legged species the segments may be lighter coloured at the tarsal joints, and in A, jeyporiensis this may be so marked as to form faint whitish spots. It will readily be recognised, however, that this lighter coloura- tion does not amount to the fairly broad " distinct white bands," about the presence or absence of which there can be no doubt even with the naked eye.) The mosquito is either A. listoni, A. culictfacies, or A. jey- poriensis. [33 Doubtful Species. Separate by careful examination of the wing markings. ( See coloured plates and descriptions.) The following, which are described as Indian species by Mr. Theobald, are not included in the synoptic table : — (1.) Anopheles (Myzomyia) leptomeres. (2 ) ,, (Myzorhynchus) vanus. (3.) „ „ minutus. (4.) „ (Aldrichia) error. Some remarks regarding these species will be found in Part II. The examinat-on and identification oflarvce. — The larvae of mosquitoes may be examined when alive or when killed and mounted on slides. In order to examine a larva when it is alive it is caught in a small spoon — care being taken not to injure it — and transferred with a drop of water on to a glass slide. A cover glass is then dropped very gently on to it. This has the effect of preventing the larva from continually wriggling out of the field of the microscope, and, if carefully done, it does not break any of the larval hairs or injure it in any way. Permanent specimens of larvae may be obtained either by mounting them simply in a solution of formalin in hollow ground glass slides, applying a cover glass and ringing it with thick Canada balsam, or by the following more permanent method, first recommended by Dr. Christophers. (a) Kill the larva by immersing it in strong formalin solution, and allow it to remain in this solution for at least twelve hours. (6) Immerse the larva after treatment in the formalin solution, in absolute alcohol for fifteen minutes. (c) Immerse it in oil of cloves. (d) Clear with xylol and mount on an ordinary flat slide under a cover glass in xylol balsam. During the above process very great care must be taken to handle the larvae gently so as not to break any of the finer hairs. They are best removed from one dish to another by lifting them up very gently on the edge of a piece of stiff paper. Another plan, which shows the palmate hairs and some other characters of the larvae exceedingly well, consists in mounting the 34] A. PLATE B. 8. PLATE IV. The larva of A. macuiipatpig ; .4.— General view of the full grown larva; B. — One of the palmate hairs magnified; C.— The frontal hairs (Median and External) of the right side, magnified. The Examination of Larvce. cast larval skins. These skins are very transparent, but they can be seen without difficulty floating near the surface of the vessel of water in which the larvae are kept. Dr. Cogill recommends that the larval skin, after having been transferred to a glass slide, should be allowed to dry thoroughly and then mounted in thin Canada balsam beneath a cover glass. It is of great advantage to be able to identify the different species of " anopheles " by an examination of their larvae alone, without the necessity of breeding out the larvae into adults. Grassi was the first to show that this could be done for some of the Italian species, and recent work by the members of the Royal Society's Malaria Commission in India has shown that the majority of the known Indian species can also be differentiated in the larval stage of their existence. The structures by which the larvae of different species of " anopheles " may be identified are as follow : — (L) The Frontal or Clypeal hairs (PL IV, A & C).— These are four fine hairs which project from the dorsal surface of the anterior end of the head. They may be called the external and the median frontal hairs. The external hairs are placed one at each corner of the dorsal chitinous end of the head, and exactly overhang the prominent so-called whorl organs or " shaving brushes." When the whorl organs are pushed out, the external (corner) hairs are difficult to see, but when the whorl organs are drawn in, they stand out prominently. The median hairs arise close together near the middle line and project forward in front of the head. They are easily seen under a ^ or ^ inch objective. A very important difference between the larvae of different species depends upon the fact that the characters of these external and median frontal hairs differ in different species. The details of these differences are given under the descriptions of the several species. (2) The Palmate hairs (PL IV, A & B).— If the dorsal surface of the abdomen of an " anopheles " larva is examined under the microscope, a pair of little fan -shaped organs will be seen on the majority of the segments. These are the so-called "Palmate hairs." Each consists of a short stalk surmounted by a bundle of about 15 to 18 hairs which are arranged round the stalk like the petals of a flower. When the larva comes to the surface [35 The Identification of Larva. these leaflets spread out and form a series of little cup-shaped organs which serve to keep the larva floating in the horizontal position. Both the number of the palmate hairs and the shape of each leaflet differ in different species of " anopheles," so that in this fact we have a second means of distinguishing the larvae of different species. (3) The Antenna (PI. IV, A.) — These structures are very easily recognised, and in the majority of Indian species they differ but little. A very small hair should be noted on the outer side of the antenna at about the junction of its middle and lower third in the majority of the larvae. The larvae of two of the Indian species of "anopheles," however are readily distinguished from those of any other species by the presence of a stout branching hair on the inner side of each antenna, quite distinct from the small external hair referred to above. The characters of this large branching hair are shown in the diagram of the larva of A. barbirostris (Plate V, Fig. 1, A and D). (4) The pattern of the head markings. — Although the pattern on the dorsal surface of the head of " anopheles" larvae is formed by dots of pigment only, and is therefore liable to considerable variation, yet in some species the head pattern is sufficiently constant to be of assistance in the identification of larvae. The inverted triangular area enclosing four dots of pig- ment on the dorsal surface of the head of the larva of A. rossi, for example, is very characteristic (PI. VI, Fig. 1, A), as is also the complete absence of any pattern on the head of the larvae of A . stephensi (PL VI, Fig. 2, A). The usual markings on the heads of these and other larvae are given in the diagrams. (5) The Basal hair. — We have already described in Chapter I the position of this hair. Its shape and character are particularly remarkable in the larvae of A. culiciformis and at once serve to differentiate the larvae of this species from all others. (6) The Posterior hair.—Ln some larvae, as we have already mentioned, two hairs arise from the clypeus behind and between the frontal hairs. In the larvae of A. turkhudi (PI. VIII, Fig. 2 ) these hairs are unbranched and very long. In the larvae of A. jeyporiensis (PI. VII, Fig. 2) they are short but branched. It should be noted that in the identification of any particu- lar larva, too much stress should not be laid on any one of the 36] Table of the Larva of Indian Anopheles. above structures alone, but that a careful consideration of the characters of all the structures taken together will yield the most accurate results. This is necessary because, as Dr. Cogill has recently shown, the characters of the frontal hairs may occasionally vary even among a series of larvas from the same batch of eggs. As an aid to the identification of the larvae of some of the Indian "anopheles," we may arrange those of which the characters are known in the following table, which is a modification of that given by Stephens and Christophers : — I.— ANTENIM/E WITH A LARGE BRANCHED HAIR A.— With simple unbranched frontal hairs. 1. A. lindesayi. B.— With branched frontal hairs. 2. A. barbirostris ;.. ... ... Median frontal hairs unbranched. The branches of the external frontal hairs arise from the main stem and from other branches. 3. A. nigerrimus ... ... ... Median frontal hairs unbranched. The branches of the external frontal hair all arise from the main stem. II.-ANTENN/E WITHOUT A LARGE BRANCHED HAIR. A.— With fully developed palmate hairs on the thorax. (a) With simple unbranched frontal hairs. 4. A. culicifacies ... ... ... The filaments of the palmate hair leaflets rather long. 5. A. listoni ... ... ... Palmate hairs very large and distinct on the thorax and abdominal segments. Filaments of leaflets shorter. Characteristic head pattern. 6. A. culiciformis ... ... ... Basal hair characteristic. Median frontal hairs long. Leaflets of palmate hairs taper to a point. (b) With branched frontal hairs. 7. A. jeyporiensis ... ... ... Two small branched posterior hairs in addition to the frontal hairs. Palmate hairs very large and distinct. Filaments of leaflets short. 8 A. maculipalpis .,., ... ... No posterior hair. Filaments of palmate hair leaflets rather long. B.— Without fully developed palmate hairs on the thorax. (a) With simple unbranched frontal hairs. 9. A. rossi ... ... ... ... Characteristic head pattern. Fully developed pal- mate hairs on the 3rd to the 7th segments of abdomen. Filaments of leaflets very long. 10. A. stephensi ... ... ... No head pattern. Filaments of palmate hair leaf- lets shorter. 11. A. theobaldi ... ... ... Filaments of palmate hair leaflets very short and blunt. 12. A. maculatus ... ... ... Filaments short but sharp pointed. 13. A. elegans ... ... ... Leaflets of palmate hairs taper to a point; no distinct filaments. 14. A. turkhudi ... ... ... Two very long unbranched posterior hairs in addi- tion to the frontal hairs. Fully developed palmate hairs on the fourth, fifth and sixth abdominal seg- ments only. 15. A. karwari. (b) With branched frontal hairs. 16. A. fuliginosus ... ... ... Frontal hairs very much branched. 17. A. pulcherrimus ... ... ... Frontal hairs only slightly branched or frayed. 18. A. aitkeni ... ... ... External frontal hairs unbranched, median forked. [37 How to collect and examine the eggs. The examination and identification of eggs. — In order to obtain eggs of " anopheles" it is necessary to preserve some female mos- quitoes of this kind that have been caught in a native village, until they have deposited their eggs. The best method of keeping mosquitoes alive for this purpose is that recommended by Drs. Stephens and Christophers. A glass "chutney" or " pickle" jar with a wide mouth and a hollow glass stopper is obtained, and after it has been thoroughly cleaned and dried a piece of cardboard is placed in it of such a size that after being forced into the jar it remains firmly fixed (Fig. 7). The stopper is filled nearly to the brim with water, and a thin piece of cork covered with white paper is put to float in it. The mosquitoes that have been caught (both males and females) are transferred from the collecting tubes into the jar, which is then placed upside down upon the stopper in a dark cupboard. If mosquitoes from a village are used, it will usually be found that even after one night some of them will have deposited their eggs. Some of the eggs will almost always be found on the white paper, which can then be removed and placed on the microscope stage, the eggs being examined by reflected light with a half or two-thirds inch objective. Great care should, of course, be taken that all the mosquitoes in the jar are of the same species, for, if more than one kind is introduced, it will be impossible to tell to which species the eggs belong. The points to which attention should be directed in the examin- ation of an " anopheles" egg are : (1) The upper surface. — The width of the upper surface should be carefully measured, and it should be especially noted whether the floats almost touch each other on this surface, or whether their inner edges are wide apart. (2 ) The floats. — The character, size and extent of the floats should be noted, and it should especially be seen whether their inner edges encroach on the upper surface of the egg, or whether the floats are inserted laterally so that their inner edges are wide apart on the dorsum of the egg. 38] Fig. 7. (after Stephens and Christophers.) Characters of Anopheles eggs. (3) The rim or frill. — It should be noted whether the rim is wide or narrow and whether the floats appear to arise from it, or whether they arise behind it, in which case it would be continued uninterruptedly round the upper surface of the egg. (4) The lower surface. — It should be noted whether the lower surface is smooth and uniformly coloured, or whether it is marked with silvery lines dividing it into a number of polygonal areas. Fig. 8. (After Stephens and Christophers. 1, A. culicifaeies ; 2, A. pulcherrimus ; 3, A. rossi ; 4, A. stephensi : 5, A. turkhudi ; 6, A. maculipalpis. The following types of " anopheles" ova have been described by Drs. Stephens and Christophers : — Type 1. — Ova having the upper surface very narrow, the rim or frill being continued uninterruptedly round this surface and the lateral floats not touching its margins (Fig. 8, 1). Some species with ova of this type are : — A culicifacies, A. listoni, A. barbirostris, A. nigerrimus. Type 2. — Ova having a more or less broad upper surface with the lateral floats touching its margins and apparently arising from the frill (Fig. 8, 2, 3, 4, 6.) [39 Types of Ova. Some species with ova of this type are :— A. rossi, A. pul- cherrimus, A. juliginosus, A. stephensi. Type 3. — Ova with no floats and with the upper surface rudi- mentary (Fig. 8, 5.) Only one species, viz., A. turkhudi, is at present known to have ova of this type. Further details regarding the ova of different species will be found in Part II. 40] • j /^.--.- '{"j*"'' -- T S. \pTKf; ni •*t»-iir. a ad throughout tht- «*w *t*iif4Mrp, (he oft«ct diwtribution of each species that » C**k requiring the nttentiori ni niaux* ^«:. rt»- riAp which accompanies .thi« ,,>f cb"«r w'i->^ work or pleasure takes them .,i-.^«r.M»r«*i pf-«-*«'ftt oacapyin^ <*> Urge a f»art of the outline. <.::.^«. it would seem that many species *% .{. b'jrbiroslris, A. niyerrimus> and A. ••• length and breadth of the country. < '-i-fMta^ and A. maculipalyris, have beer* tb and as far south as Travancore, i the intervening territories, pro- •d for in those parts by \ at least, of • -A. m« , A. (•'• A. trosst xx A. fULIGINOSUS OO A. MACULtPAlPIS •• A. THEOBALOI .. _ _ A. PULCHZRRIMLia, ft A. CULICIFACIES A. LISTONI CHAPTER III. THE HABITS OF INDIAN ANOPHELES. Distribution and prevalence. may perhaps be owing to the fact that " anopheles'' mosquitoes have been more closely studied in India than in any other tropical region, that the number of species recorded from this country is greater, and the known distribution of individual species appears to be wider, than in any other part of the world. Indeed, there is as yet no trustworthy record of the absence of " anopheles" from any part of India, and they have been shown to be present more or less abundantly wherever careful search for them has been made. Even in places at a height above the sea-level of between 6,000 and 7,000 feet they frequently occur, and throughout the plains they are exceedingly prevalent. To ascertain, with any approach to accuracy, the exact distribution of each species that occurs in India, would be a task requiring the attention of many trained observers for a considerable period of time, and at present it is impossible to do more than indicate, in a general way, the partial distribution of some of the better known species. This we have attempted to do on the outline map which accompanies this chapter, in the hope that those whose work or pleasure takes them to parts as yet unexplored from this point of view, will fill in the bare spaces at present occupying so large a part of the outline. So far as our knowledge goes, it would seem that many species such as A. rossi, A.fuliginosus, A. barbirostris, A. nigerrimus, and A. culicifacies, occur throughout the length and breadth of the country. Others, such as A. pulcherrimus, and A. maculipalpis, have been found as far north as the Punjab and as far south as Travancore, but have not been recorded from the intervening territories, pro- bably because they have not been searched for in those parts by competent observers. It is also known that some, at least, of the species occur in other countries as well as in India — A. maculipalpis, for example, which is a common African species, A. barbirostris, [41 General and local distribution. which occurs in Java, the Malay Archipelago, Old Calabar, &c. , and A. maculatus, which occurs in China. The group of Indian species, including A. listoni and A. culicifacies, is also very near, if not iden- tical with, the African group, including A. funestus and its allies, and the unspotted winged species A. aitkeni is a near neighbour of the European species A. bifurcatus, and the Algerian species A. algeriensis. It would seem, therefore, that many of the Indian species have a wide distribution in nature. But a distinction must be made between the general distribution of a species and its dis- tribution in the particular countries where it occurs. There seems no reason to doubt that some "anopheles," such as A. rossi, do not habitually act as carriers of malaria in nature. To whatever cause this is due — whether to the fact that such species have become immune to the malaria parasite, or because they habitually feed on the blood of domestic animals rather than on that of man — it is the chief reason why a knowledge of the local distribution of individual species is so important. Although the geographical distribution of a species may be wide, its local distribution may be very limited. A. listoni, for example, though it has been found in India as far north as the foot of the Himalayas and as far south as Goa in the Bombay Presidency, is quite unknown in the Punjab. A. rossi and A. stephensi, also, though they are very common in Calcutta, are very rare or absent in many parts of the Duars, which is only a com- paratively short distance away. A. jeyporiensis, again, has been found up to the present only in two districts, namely, the Jeypore agency in the Madras Presidency, and Nagpur in the Central Pro- vinces ; and A. elegans in only one place in the Bombay Presidency. It even happens, not infrequently, that the anopheles fauna of two places only a few miles apart is entirely different. In some cases this localized distribution of species is due to differences in the charac- ter of breeding grounds. In Calcutta, for example, almost the only breeding places are ponds and pools of water the favourite breed- ing grounds of A. rossi, while in the Duars the prevailing breeding grounds are running streams — the favourite breeding places of Af listoni. Climate is also an important factor, as in the cases of A. lindesayi and A. gigas, which are found only in hill districts, and a particular kind of food supply may also have some influence, as in the case of A. rossi, which is never found very far from human dwellings. 42] Climate and Season. As regards the abundance of " anopheles" present in any district, it is well known that they may be very numerous in one place and scanty or almost unknown in another, and also that, while one specie8 is very abundant, another may be very rare. Other things being equal, this dissimilarity in prevalence is due to differences in the num~ ber, extent, and character, of breeding grounds, and, as a general rule, it may be said that there is a direct relation between the extent and proximity of breeding grounds and o the number of " a n o pheles " present in any place. The prevalence of these insects varies also ac- cording to the season of the year, and the influence of this factor is more marked in the case of some species than of others. The accom- panying chart illustrates the seasonal - 3, •? 3 % ") 1 ^ II 6- 5* + - 3' &• 1 - =0= ^ ko I 8 2 SO 28 26 Z+ 22 20 18 16 & 12. IO 8 6 4 2 *£, - JANUARY FEBRUARY \ ! MARCH \ APRIL \ ^ % JUNE \ JULY | AUGUST \ SEPTEMBER OCTOBER j NOVEMBER \ DECEMBER r / «x \ / / t ^ // / t \ ^•**^ V / u / i t i 1 —- -* A I i i ! ,\ I » t \ i f t I/ //' / \ t & ft n\ i i \ 1 M •,?/ i \ si .V. */ g t '••i\ \ i « i j ^ J ' 1 I « 1 / 1 $ .1 ^1 >)• \ \ 1 | f t 7 Jg •^ / 1 1, I \ / jl 1 1 « t X — 1 1 T''\~ 1 /* / V i / \ 1 t \ '^^ t v...^ s ,' ~~~~"""***"~*' • Curve of irrigation suppLy Co Mi<3.n Mir fciverdg'e of 7 years). Curves of A .CuHcifaciea. R<3.inf~°A / Ny PLATE XIII. Anopheles aitleni ; showing the head of the larva (note the "basal hnirs ' external to the antennae), a palmate liair, and the outline of the wing. 4 nopheles immaculatus . brown, with ochraceous reflections, the tarsi dark in some lights, with pale apical bands ; wings with ochraceous veins, unspotted. Head dark brown, with grey upright-forked scales in front, ochraceous and darker ones behind, while narrow-curved scales in front form a more or less projecting mass, beneath which arises a tuft of long white hair-like scales ; antennse brown, the basal joint bright testaceous, the next few joints with pale scales ; palpi short for an Anopheles, rather thick, covered with dense brown, grey and ochraceous scales, the brown scales basal, the others form- ing most of the apical covering ; proboscis about the same length as the palpi, ochraceous brown with a paler tip. Thorax ashy-brown with slaty reflections, with darker longi- tudinal lines, one being median, the surface with pale golden, hair- like curved scales, a tuft of pale scales projecting over the head in front ; scutellum with narrow-curved, hair-like, pale golden scales, and brown border bristles ; metanotum deep brown. Abdomen deep brown to black, with golden hairs, which are very dense on the apical segments. Legs ochraceous with brown scales, scantily set on the femora, so that they appear dull ochraceous ; the tarsi are darker, especially on the hind legs, which have the apices of the joints banded with ochraceous ; to some extent this banding may be seen in the fore and mid legs ; ungues equal, simple, deep brown, large for an Anopheles. Wings unspotted, with yellowish veins and pallid scales ; fork- cells rather short, the first sub-marginal longer and narrower than the second posterior cell, their bases nearly level, the stems longer than the cells ; supernumerary and mid-cross veins apparently in one line, the posterior cross-vein about three times its own length behind the mid-cross vein ; halteres ochraceous. Habitat and observations. — Mr. Theobald says the specimen is " evidently from Goa," and that it was given to him by Captain Liston. This is incorrect. It was captured at Ennur — a small village on the East Coast about ten miles from Madras — and sent to Mr. Theobald by Dr. Stephens. The markings on the palpi must have faded somewhat by the time the specimen reached Mr. Theobald, for in the fresh state three white bands were distinctly present — a very broad apical one extending over nearly the outer half of each palp, and two very narrow basal ones. Anopheles culiciformis. GROUP X. Type : — A. culiciformis. 23. ANOPHELES CULICIFORMIS (sp. n.) (Figure facing page 122). This is a rather large, brown "anopheles," for some time confounded with the much smaller A. aitkeni till separated by Dr. Cogill by its very markedly " culex" like attitude, by the relative position of the transverse veins, and particularly by the marked difference in the structure of the larva. This mosquito might be Theobald's Stethomyia nimba, but he states that in that mosquito the halteres have a pallid stem and fuscous knob, while this species has a black knob covered with brown scales. Another important difference is found in the characters of the male insect, for while Theobald states that S. nimba has the fore ungues in the male unequal, the larger uniserrated, Dr. Cogill has drawn our attention to the fact that there is only one claw on each fore leg of culiciformis and that has only a single tooth. In all other respects this mosquito conforms with Theobald's description of S. nimba. The palpi are entirely covered with brown scales ; without any bands ; rather shorter than the proboscis. The head is chiefly covered with brown upright-forked scales, but there are a few white spindle-shaped scales in the middle line in front ; there is no distinct frontal tuft of hairs. There are rather more numerous and stronger brown hair-like bristles around the eyes and on the front of the head than is usual in other " Anopheles." Thorax covered with a few white hair-like scales and many long brown bristles. Prothoracic lobes distinctly mammilated as in Theobald's Stethomyia nimba. Scutellum with long brown bristles ; in the middle there are a few short scale-like bristles. Abdomen brown, covered with numerous fine golden aod coarse brown hairs. Wings unspotted and covered with rather broad spindle-shaped scales approximating in shape to those found on nigerrimus. Vena- tion as in other " Anopheles." Transverse veins almost in one line. Halteres with light stem and dark brown knob covered with brown scales. Legs long and thin, entirely brown and covered with scales. I22J PLATE XV PLATE XV. The larva of A. cidiclformis ; showing the characteristic " basal hairs " external to the antennae, the absence of palmate hairs on the first abdominal segment, and the shape of the palmate hair leaflet*. Anopheles culiciformis. The male of this mosquito differs from all other " anopheles" in that the claws on the fore legs are single and uniserrated. There are structural differences too in the larva which differentiate this mosquito from all others. Characters of the larva (Fig. facing page 122). — The frontal hairs are simple and unbranched ; the median hairs are very close together and long ; the external angular very short. The most characteristic and constant feature of this larva is the peculiar structure of the " basal hair." In most " anopheles" this hair is much branched ; in the larva of this species it is made up of a long stalk covered with a few hairs ; the extremity appears as if jointed to the stalk, and is somewhat swollen and covered with a corona of fine hairs. The next point in which this larva differs from other " anopheles" is that the " balancer" hair on the third abdominal segment is simple and unbranched. A third peculiarity is found in the fact that well-developed palmate hairs are found on all the abdominal segments except the first and last, and there is also a pair on the thorax. The shape of the leaflets of each pal- mate hair most nearly resembles that of the leaflets of the palmate hairs of the larvae of barbirostris. There is no well defined blade as contrasted with the terminal filament in each leaflet. Habitat and observations. — This mosquito was bred from larvae collected near Karwar, in the Bombay Presidency, by Dr. Cogill. There seems to us to be no doubt that it would be placed by Mr. Theobald in his genus Stethomyia. [123 GENERAL INDEX. A. Abdomen, of larva, 8, 9 ; of adult insect, 13, 14 ; scale structure of, 17 ; examination of, 29. Aedeomyia, genus, 17. Aedeomyina, sub-family, 5, 6, 17. Aestivation, 55. Air-sacs, 12. Aldrichia, genus, 18, 19, 61, 112 ; error, 17, 19, 34, 112. Anal cell of wing, 15. " Anopheles," 6 ; eggs of, 7, 8, 38 ; larva of, 8, 9, 10, 11, 35, 36 ; pupa of, 13 ; collec- tion of, 22 ; mounting of adults, 28 ; of larvae, 34 ; examination of, 28 ; identification of, 30, 34, 38 ; synoptic table of adults, 32 ; of larvae, 37 ; differences between male and female, 13 ; scale structure of, 16, 17, 18 19 ; classification of, 18, 19, 59 ; distribution and prevalence of, 41 ; relative abundance of, 43, 53, 54 ; habits of, 41 ; distance of flight of, 45 ; hibernation of, 44 ; migration of, 45 ; mode of spread of, 47 ; breeding grounds of, 48 ; food of adults, 54 ; of larvae, 57 ; nocturnal habits of, 54 ; as carriers of filarise, 55, 81 ; length of life of, 55 ; swarm- ing of, 55 ; position when resting, 56 ; in relation to malaria, 4::, 47, 48, 53, 54. Anopheles, genus, 18, 19, 20, 64. Anophelina, sub-family, 5, 6, 18. Antennae of larva, 9, 36 ; of adult, 13 ; in identification, 13, 28. Arribalzagia, genus, 18. B. Balancer hair, 123. Balancers, 3. Basal hair, 10, 36, 123. Bot-flies, 4. Blood worms, 12. Blue bottle flies, 4. Breeding grounds, as factors in distribution of species, 42 ; as factors in prevalence of adult insects, 43 ; as factors in distance of flight of adults, 46 ; selection of, by different species, 48 ; of Indian species, 50. Breeding out larvae, 25. c. Cecidomyidoe, 4 ; characters of, 5. Cellia, genus, 18, 65. Cells of wing, 15. [125 General Index. Chironomidae, 4, 5 ; larva of, 12. Christia, genus, 18 19. Classification of Culiddae, 5 ; of " anopheles," 18, 59 ; scale structure as a basis of, 17, 63, 97, 100, 103, 112, 114 ; entomologists and, 60 ; medical men and, 63, 64, 67 ; individual differences, monstrosities and varieties in, 60 ; dimorphism in, 61 ; as an aid in identification of species, 20, 64 ; habits and pathological signi- ficance in, 64, 66 ; into groups of closely allied forms, 66. Climate, effect on distribution of " anopheles, " 42. Clypeal hairs, 10, 35. Clypeus of larva, 10 ; of adult insect, 13. Cocades, 68. Collection of adult mosquitoes, 22 ; of larvae, 25 ; of eggs, 38. Costa, 14. Coxa, 14. Corethra, genus, eggs of, 7 ; larva of, 12. Corethrina, sub-family, 5, 6, 1 2. Cross veins, 15. " Culex," 6 ; eggs of, 6 ; larva of, 8, 9, 10, 11 ; pupa of, 13 ; scale structure of, 17 ; position when resting, 57. Culex, genus, 7, 9, 14, 17. Culicidcet family, 3, 4 ; classification of, 5. Culicina, sub-family, 5, 6, 7. Cycloleppteron, genus, 18. Cyclorrhapha, group, 4. D. Daddy-long-legs, 4. Dimorphism, 61. Dipping for larvae, 25. Diptera, order of, 3, 4. Distance of flight of " anopheles," 45. Dispersal of " anopheles," 47. Distinctions between mosquitoes and other flies, 4. Distribution of " anopheles," 41, 42. Dixa, larva of, 12. " Domestic " species, 22, 53. Eggs, hatching of, 4 ; differences between " culex " and " anopheles," 6 ; rafts of, 7 ; of Stegomyia, Panoplites, Psoropkora, Janthinsoma, 7 ; of " anopheles," 8 ; collection, examination and identification of, 38 ; duration of egg-stage, 57 ; resistance to drying, 57 ; laid on mud, 57. Entomologists and classification, 5, 60. Ephemera, larva of, i2. Epipharynx, 13. Examination of eggs, 38 ; of larvae, 34 ; of mosquitoea, 28, 33. P. Families mistaken for mosquitoes, 4. Feeding brushes, 10. 126] General Index. Femur, 14. Flesh flies, 4. Flies, differences between mosquitoes and, 4. Flight of " anopheles," 44. Floats of eggs, 8, 38. Food of adult " anopheles," 54 ; of larvae, 57 ; as a factor in distribution of "anopheles," 42 ; as a factor in distance of flight, 46. Frill of " anopheles " eggs, 8, 39. Fringe, wing, 16. Frontal hairs of larva, 10, 35, 37 ; tuft, 29. Fungus-midges, 4. GK Gad-flies, 6. Gall-midges, 4. Genitalia, 14 ; mounting of, 28 ; examination of, 30. Genus, definition of, 59. Geographical races, 63. Gnats, 3. Green bottle flies, 4. Groups, by colour markings, 30 ; by breeding grounds, 50 ; by habits and pathological significance, 31 ; in systematic classification, 59 ; of closely allied forms, 66. H. Hairs, important larval, 10, 35, 36. Halteres, 3, 14, 29 ; scales on, 17. Haunts of adult " anopheles," 22, 24. Heptaphlebomyina, sub-family, 5, 6, 61. Hibernation of adults and larvae, 44, 55, 56, 58. Horse flies, 4. House flies, 4. Hover flies, 4. Hypopharynx, 13. I. Identification of adult " anopheles," 30 ; of larvae, 34 ; of eggs, 38 ; synoptic tables for, 32, 37 ; larval hairs as an aid in, 10 ; classification as an aid in, 64. Imago, 4. Individual differences, 59. Insecta, 3. Janthinsoma, genus, eggs of, 7. Joblotina, sub-family, 5, 6, 17. L. Labium, 13. Labrum, 13. Larvae, 3, 4 ; description of, 8 ; differences between " culex " and " anopheles," 8, 9 ; collection of, 25 ; mounting of, 34 ; examination and identification of, 34 ; movements in water, 10 ; method of feeding, 10 ; food of " anopheles, " 57 ; [127 General Index. important hairs on, 10, 35 ; head pattern of, 36 ; resistance to drying, 58 ; duration of larval stage, 58 ; hibernation of, 58 ; of Chironnntus, Ephemera and Dixa, 12 ; synoptic table of Indian "anopheles," 37. Legs, examination of, 30, 33 ; segments of which composed, 14 ; scales on, 17. Length of life of " anopheles, " 55. Local forms, 63. M. Malaria, influence of species of " anopheles, " 42, 67, 71 ; relative abundance of " anopheles " in relation to, 53, 54 ; habits of " anopheles " in relation to prevention of, 47. Mandibles, 10, 13. Mansonia, genus, 18. Marginal transverse vein, 15. Maxillae, 10, 13. Megarhinina, sub-family, 5, 6. Meso thorax, 14. Metamorphosis, definition of, 3 ; stages of, in mosquitoes, 4, 6. Metanotum, 14, 29. Metatarsus, 14. Mid-cross vein, 15. Midges, 4. Migration of " anopheles, " 45. Monstrosities, 60, 61. Mosquitoes, general account of, 3 ; differences between other flies and, 4 ; classifica- tion of, 5 ; larvae of, 4 ; adult insect, 13 ; differences between male and female, 13 ; collection of, 22 ; mounting of, 26 ; preservation of, 26 ; exa- mination of, 28 ; differences between " anopheles " and other kinds, 14. Mounting of adult '' anopheles, " 26 ; of larvae, 34. Mouth parts of adult mosquito, 13. Movements of larvae in water, 10. Mucidus, wing scales of, 17. Muscidce, 4. Mycetophilidce, 4. Myzomyia, genus, 18, 19, 20, 66. Myzorhynchus, genus, 18, 19. N. Nape, 13. Nocturnal habits of " anopheles," 54. Nyrnpha, see Pupa. Nyssorhynchus, genus, 18, 19, 21, 65 o Objections to Mr. Theobald's classification of "anopheles," 19,63,82,97, 100,103, 112, 114. Occiput, 13. Oestridce, 4. Order, definition of, 59. 128] General Index. Orthorrhapha group, 4. Ovum, 6. Owl midges, 4. P Palmate hairs of larva, 9, 35 . Palpi, length of as basis of, classification, 5 ; of adult insect, 14 ; in identification, 28, 30, 31 ; scale structure, 17. Panoplites, genus, 18 ; eggs of, 7 ; wing scales of, 17, 18 ; palpi of, 14. Phantom larvae, 12. Posterior cross-vein, 15. Posterior hair of larva, 10, 36 . Preservation of mosquitoes, 27. Prevalence of " anopheles," 41, 44. Pro-thoracic lobes, 18, 122. Proboscis, 4 ; scale structure, 17. Psorophora, genus, eggs of, 7. Psyckodidos, 4 ; characters of, 5. Pupa, 4, 12 ; distinctions between "eulex" and " anopheles,"13 ; breathing horns of, as a means of distinguishing species, 68. Pupa-case, mode of opening of, 4. Pyretopkorus, genus, 18, 19, 66. Respiratory tubes of larvse, 8, 12. Rim of " anopheles " eggs, 8, 39. s Sabethes, leg scales of, 17. Sandflies, 4. Scales, different forms of, 16 ; on wing veins, 4 ; as a basis of classification, 17, 18, 19» 20,21,63,97,100,103,112, 114. Scutellum, 14, 29. Seasonal prevalence, 43. " Shaving brushes," 35. Simulidce, 4, 5. Siphon tube of larvse^S ; of Stegomyia, Culex and Tceniorhynchus larvae, 9. Siphonic index, 9. Species, definition of, 59 ; differentiation of, 62. Speckling of palpi and legs, 29, 30, 33. Spiracles, 13. Splitting of pupa-case, 4. Stegomyia, eggs of, 7 ; larva of, 9 ; characters of palpi, 14 ; scale structure of, 17. Stethomyia, genus, 18, 122. Streams and canals as factors in spread of " anopheles," 47. Subcostal vein, 15. Supernumerary cross-vein, 15. Swarming of " anopheles," 55. Synoptic tables, 32, 37. Syrphidce, 4. General Index. T. Tabanidoe, 4. Tceniorhynchus, eggs of, 7 ; larva of, 9 ; wing scales of, 17, 18. Tarsal joints, 14, 33. Tarsal segments, 14, 30, 33. Test-pool experiment, 52. "Iheobald, classification of mosquitoes, 5 ; of "anopheles," 18, 19, 20, 21, 63, 64, 65, 97, 100, 103, 112, 114 ; differentiation of species, 62. Thorax of larvae, 10 ; of adult insect, 13, 14 ; examination of, 29 ; scale structure, 18 Tibia, 14. Tipulidce, 4, 5. Tracheae of larvae, 8, 12. Transverse veins, 15, 29, 62. Trochanter, 14. Tsetse flies, 4. Tube for preserving mosquitoes, 27. Tuft, frontal, 29. u. Ungues, mounting of, 28 ; examination of, 30. V. Veins of wings, arrangement of, 4, 14. Variation, 62 ; in frontal hairs of larvae, 37. Varieties, 60, 66. w. Warble flies, 4. Whorl organs, 10, 35. Wild species of "anopheles," 24, 53. Wing, fringe, 16 ; markings, 29 ; scales, 17, veins, 14 ; mounting of, 28. Winter, methods by which mosquitoes tide over, 44. 130] INDEX OF SPECIES. The principal reference to each species is printed in heavier type. A aitkeni, 19,32, 37, 42, 56, 73, 119. albirostris, 7 1 . alboannulatus, 81. albotoeniatus, 68. algeriensis, 42, 120. B bancroftii, 68. barbirostris, 19, 32, 36, 37, 39, 41, 51, 53, 68, 77, 79. bifurcate, 42, 120. c christophersi, 106, 103. coatalis, 72, 112. culicifacies, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 32, 33, 37, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 49, 50, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 66, 70, 101, 103, 106, 112. culiciformis, 10, 32, 36, 56, 73, 122. E. elegans, 19, 32, 37, 42, 69, 82. error, 17, 19, 34, 112. P. fluviatilis, 103, 106. fuliginosus, 19, 32, 33, 37, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 53, 54, 58, 61, 69, 89, 91, 95, 100. funestus, 42, 60, 62, 67, 71, 106. G gigas, 19, 21, 32, 42, 72, 117, 118. immacidatns, 19, 32, 119, 120. i.ndica, 109. mdiensf*, 19, 81 ; variety, 97. J. jameri, 19, 32, 33, 51, 89, 93, 96, 100. jeyp&riensis, 10, 19, 20, 32, 33, 36, 37, 42, 70, 101, 105, 108. Index of Species. K karwari, 10, 19, 32, 37, 89, 100. L leptomeres, 34, 71. leucophyrus, 19, 82, 85. lindesayi, 19, 32, 37, 42, 72, 117. listoni, 19, 20, 32, 33, 37, 39, 42, 48, 50, 54, 62, 67, 101, 103, 108. M maculatus, 19, 21, 32, 37, 42, 52, 70, 89, 91, 99, 100, 115. macidipalpis, 19, 29, 32, 33, 37, 41, 89, 95, 100. maculipennis, 54, 55. malayensis, 68. mauritianus, 68. metaboles, 113, 115 minutus, 19, 34, 60, 68, 79, 81. N nagpori, 32, 72, 101, 117. nigerrimus, 19, 37, 39, 41, 48, 51, 68, 77, 79. nimba, 121. P paludis, 68. pseudopictus, 68, 81. pulcheirimus, 19, 29, 32, 37, 40, 41, 44, 45, 69, 86, 114. punctulatus, 32, 69, 82, 84 112. R. rhodesiensis, 60, 62, 71. rotri, 19, 20, 21, 23, 31, 32, 36, 37, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 51, 53, 54, 56, 58, 61r 66, 69, 71, 109, 112. s. smen&is, 17, 19, 32, 68, 81. stepensi, 19, 21, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 40, 42, 45; 49, 51, 69, 71, 89, 109, 111, 113, 115. T. tenebrosus, 68. tJieobaldi, 19, 32, 37, 70, 89, 95, 97, 100. turkhiidi, 10, 19, 21, 32, 36, 40, 72, 115 u umbrosus, 68. V vanus, 34, 81. w willmori, 19, 21, 32, 69, 86, 88, 114. 132] Claws — Tar sal Seqmenks Anterior Transverse veins Middte Leo Proboscis Antenna Occiput K IP '4th Beg? f ' Fro/it al —tuft 1st Loncjikudin al I "tin 2nd Longitudinal I »» Anterior branch I f >» Posterior „ \ \ \ 3/v/ Lonqihtdin a I \ \ \ tJi Femur Thora,X- Sub -costal Vein Scutellum Hotter vipositor Anterior 6 Posterior >» \\\ Anterior branch \ \ ^ Posterior >• ^ 5 tli Lonqitudina t '6(h Longitudinal, j Posteriori DESCRIPTIVE DIAGRAM ANOPHELES 9 D.A.Turkhud COLOURED PLATE No. II. Anopheles (Myzorhynchus) barbirostris. Description on page 77. \\ (surbn yihoxyM ) \ • i ANOPHELES BARBIROSTRIS D.A.Turkhud.M.B. \ \ COLOURED PLATE No. III. Anopheles (Myzorhynchus) nigerrimus. Description on page 79. A\\ AV/\ S.Tk.YV AV 3 eabriqortA V J / I ANOPHELES NIGERiMUS \ D. A Turkhud M.B. \ / COLOURED PLATE No. IV. Anopheles (Cellia) pulcherrimus. Description on page 86. -.'A, :YYUY\ riqon X X ANOPHELES PULCHERRIMUS B.A.Turkhud MB. COLOURED PLATE N». V. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) fuliginosus. Description on page .91. , *\Vv\*\ (XA'A^O. • -. • ' '••>-.' COLOURED PLATE No. VI. Anopheles ( Nyssorhynchus) jamesi. Description on page 93. vi / * ANOPHELES MACULIPALPIS D.A.TurkKud Vi.B. COLOURED PLATE No. VIII. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) theobaldi. Description on page 97. j >: ANOPHELES THEOBALDI 9 D.A.Turkhud M.B. COLOURED PLATE No. IX. Anopheles (Pyretophorus) jeyporiensis. Description on page 101. -7A .v 1 01 9gfiq no noijqi, / / V / ANOPHELES JEYPORIENSIS ¥ D.A.Turkhud.M.B. \ \ \ COLOURED PLATE No. X. Anopheles (Myzomyia) listoni. Synonym, Anopheles fluviatilis. Description on page 103. COLOURED PLATE No. XI. Anopheles (Myzomyia) culicifacies, Description on page 106 ANOPHELES CULICIFACIES 9 D.A.Turkhud M.B. COLOURED PLATE No. XI 7. Anopheles (Myzomyia) rossi. Description on page 109. ikj ANOPHELES ROSSI! 9 D.A.Turkhud. M.B. COLOURED PLATE No. XIII. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) stephensi. Description on page 113. \\VA AV/. 1 1 s no ANOPHELES STEPHEN SI COLOURED PLATE No. XIV. Anopheles (Myzomyia) turkhudi. Description on page 115. HVA < ( ) g' nu nuilt. \ ANOPHELES TURKHUDI / D.A.Turkhud M.B. COLOURED PLATE No. XV. Anopheles (Anopheles) lindesayi. Description on page 117. ANOPHELES LINDESAI 9 D.A.Turkhud M.B.