UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA |

THE LIBRARY

OF

THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA

LOS ANGELES

INDEX

OF THE

Mycological Writings

—OF—

C. G. LLOYD.

VOL. III.

1909-1912.

CINCINNATI, OHIO, U. S. A

PREFACE.

(Binding is advised in this order.)

Index Vol. III.

Mycological Notes Nos. 32-37.
Mycological Notes, Old Species, Series No. 1.
Mycological Notes, Polyporoid Issue, Nos. 1-3.
Synopsis of the Known Phalloids, 1909.
Synopsis of the Genus Hexagona, 1910.

Synopsis of the Section Microporus, Tabacinus and Funales of
the genus Polystictus, 1910.

Synopsis of the Section Ovinus of Polyporus, 1911.
Synopsis of the Stipitate Polyporoids, 1912.
Letters Nos. 25-38.

Missing numbers to complete sets will be sent as long as the
supply lasts, on request to the Lloyd Library, Cincinnati, Ohio. At
present they can be supplied excepting Nos. 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14 and
19. Missing numbers will only be sent, however, to the exchanges
of the Lloyd Library, to those who supply specimens for study, or
who for some other reason we think are entitled to them.

ABBREVIATIONS.

The following abbreviations are used in this Index:

M. N. — Mycological Notes.

M. N. Old. — Mycological Notes. Old Species Series.

M. N. Pol. — Mycological Notes. Polyporoid Issue.

Phal. — Synopsis of the Known Phalloids, 1909.

Hex. — Synopsis of the genus Hexagona, 1910.

Mic. — Synopsis of the section Microporus, of the genus Polys-
tictus, 1910.

Tab. — Synopsis of the section Tabacinus, of the genus Polys-
tictus, 1910.

Fun. — Synopsis of the section Funales, of the genus Polystictus,
1910.

Ov. — Synopsis of the section Ovinus, of Polyporus, 1911.

Stip. — Synopsis of the Stipitate Polyporoids, 1912.

Let. — Letters.

2

U/lV t*TJSM

4.-$\ v-3

INDEX OF THE PRINCIPAL SPECIES CONTAINED IN THIS
VOLUME.

The abbreviations are those used on previous page.

The genera are indexed under the generic name, as published,
with the exception of the genera Polystictus and Polyporus, con-
tained in the Synopsis of the Sections Microporus, Tabacinus, and
Funales, Synopsis of Pelloporus, and Synopsis of the Stipitate Polypor-
oids. These are indexed under the sectional heads, namely:

Amaurodermus, Fomes, Ganodermus, Lentus, Lignosus, Me-
lanopus, Merismus, Ovinus, Pelloporus, Petaloides, Spongiosus.

Amaurodermus

angustus
auriscalpium . .

Stip. 114
.Stip. 113, 189

Aseroe — Continued
lysuroides
Muelleriana

. . Phal. 48
. .Phal. 46

basilapidoides

Stip. 115

pallida

Phal 47

calcigenus
Chaperi

Stip. Ill
Stip 112 189

pentactina
rubra

. .Phal. 46
Phal 46

exilis

Stip 121

Zeylandica

Phal 47

fasciculatus.

Stip. 117

gracilis
heteromorphus.

Stip. 117
Stip. 120

echinella
pusilla

M. N. 452
M. N. 457

insularis
intermedius.. . .

Stip. 117
Stip. 112

Catastoma

nila .

M N 443

junensis
leptopus
longipes

Stip. 121
Stip. 115
Stip 115

Clathrus

affinis

. . Phal. 60

Americanus

Phal 56

macer

Stip. 119

camerunensis.

Phal 57

marasmioides. .
ocellatus

Stip. 121
Stip. 119

cancellatus

. .Phal. 54

omphalodes. . .

Stip. 113

cibarius. . . Phal. 60,

M. N. 447

chrysomycelinus

Phal 63

praetervisus

Stip 113

ramosii
renatus
renidens

Stip. Ill
Stip. 120
Stip. 115

cnspatus
crispus
delicatus
gracilis

. .Phal. 57
..Phal. 58
..Phal. 63
. .Phal. 62

rivulosus

otip. Ill

guttulatus

Phal. 58

rudis
rugosus
Schomburgkii. .
sericatus

.Stip. Ill, 189
Stip. 110
Stip. 119
Stip 120

preussii
pseudocancellatus. . .
pseudocrispus

..Phal. 63
. .Phal. 60
. .Phal. 59

Sprucei
unilaterus
variabilis
Anthurus
Archeri
aseroeformis . . .
calathiscus

Stip. Ill
Stip. 117
.Stip. Ill, 189

Phal. 43
.Phal. 42
Phal. 43

pusillus
Treubei
Clautriavia
Lauterbachii
merulina. .Phal. 24,
Colus
hirudinosus

. .Phal. 57
. .Phal. 56

. . Phal. 24
M. N. 449

. . Phal. 67

Muellerianus

. .Phal. 43

Cyclomyces

Aseroe

arachnoidea. . . .
Hookeri . .

. .Phal. 48
. .Phal. 46

fuscus
Greenii
turbinatus . .

M. N. 487

M. N. 488
M. N. 490

39841,3

.V

INDEX OF PRINCIPAL SPECIES

Favolus

M N Pol 21

Hexagona — Continued,
albida

Hex. 29

N M Pol 17

amplexens

Hex 22

M N Pol 19

apiaria

Hex. 6

Fistulina

M N Old 6

atrosanguinea
bipindiensis

Hex. 27
Hex. 36

Floccomu tinus

capillacea

.Hex. 8

Zenkeri

Phal. 35

chartacea

Hex. 20

Kom6S

concinna

Hex. 26

diabolicus

Stip. 100

cucullata

Hex. 35

graveolens
igniarius

.M. N. Pol. 43
M. N. 469

dermatiphora M
Deschampsii

. N. 501
Hex. 9

mirabilis
nigricans
pachyphloeus . .
pomaceus
torulosus,
M. N. Pol.
Ganodermus
africanus
Alluandi
amboinensis. . . .
boninensis

Let. 33
.M. N. Pol. 15
.M. N. Pol. 36
. . . .M. N. 469

48, M. N. 470

Stip. 103
Stip. 107
Stip. 102
Stip. 104

discopoda
durissima
Dybowski
elegans
erubescens
Gunnii
Henschalli
heteropora
hirta
Kurzii
leprosa

Hex. 26
Hex. 16
Hex. 11
.Hex. 9
Hex. 21
Hex. 15
Hex. 11
Hex. 39
.Hex. 7
Hex. 21
Hex 20

cochlear
Curtisii

Stip. 103
Stip. 102

macrotrema
Miquelii

Hex. 30
Hex 36

Emini
flexipes

Stip. 105
Stip 104

mirabilis

Hex. 37
Hex 18

fornicatus
Henningsii

Stip. 104
Stip 105

nitida

Hex. 14
Hex 31

Hildebrandi

Stip 107

phaeophora

Hex ?6

incrustans
japonicus

Stip. 102
Stip 102

Pobeguini ..Hex. 17, M

. N. 500
Hex 25

Lauterbachii . .
lingua

Stip. 102
Stip. 104

pulchella
resinosa

Hex. 25
Hex 16

lucidus , . .
mastoporus ....
ochrolaccatus. .
opacus
pisachapani.. . .
placopus
regulicolor
(unnamed) ....
valesiacus
Geaster
Dybowski
Hexagona

.Stip. 102, 189
Stip. 104
Stip. 105
Stip. 106
Stip. 107
Stip. 105
Stip. 104
Stip. 107
Stip. 102

. . . .M. N. 474

rhombipora
rigida
Sacleuxii
Seurati
scutigera
similis
speciosa
subtenuis. .Hex. 26, M
sulcata
tenuis
umbrinella
variegata.. .

Hex. 34
Hex. 26
Hex. 27
Hex. 33
Hex. 13
Hex. 27
Hex. 21
. N. 502
Hex. 15
Hex. 23
Hex. 26
Hex. 12

aculeata

Hex. 9

velutina

Hex. 14

aequalis

Hex. 33

vesoacea. .

Hex. 33

INDEX OF PRINCIPAL SPECIES

Itajahya

galericulata

Phal 27

Lentus — Continued
pseudo-perennis Stip. 174
repando-lobatus Stip. 172
rhizophilus Stin 1 74

Jansia

annulata
boninensis
elegans

Phal. 34
Phal. 34
Phal. 33

scabriceps

. . Stip. 171

subvirgatus
tiliae

. . . .Stip. 172
Stip 175

rugosa
truncata
Kalchbrennera
corallocephala . .
Lanopila
pygmaea
Laternea
angolensis

Phal. 33

. .. .M. N. 484

Phal. 68
. .. .M. N. 442
..Phal. 50

tricholoma
tuba
umbilicatus

Stip. 170
. .. .Stip. 177
... .Stip. 171
. .. .Stip. 171
. ...Stip. 172
....Stip. 173

...M. N. 503
Stip 131

vernalis
virgatus
xanthopus
Lenzites
ochroleuca
Lignosus
annulatus
aquosus

bicolumnata . . .
columnata
pusilla
rhacodes
Spegazzini
triscapa
Lentodium
squamulosum.. .
Lentus
acicula

Phal. 51
Phal. 48
Phal. 50
Phal 50

Stip. 130

Phal. 51
Phal. 48

..M. N. Old.8
Stip. 177

arenatus

Stip. 126

atro-purpureus. .
brunneo-pictus. .
camerarius

. .. .Stip. 126
....Stip. 127
Stip. 126

corrugis

Stip. 122

dealbatus
dubiopansus. . . .
fusco-maculatus.
hypoplastus

Stip. 124, 190
. .. .Stip. 125
.. . .Stip. 130
Stip. 126

arcularius
brumalis
ciliaris

Stip. 175
Stip. 170
Stip 176

ciliatus.

Stip. 171

pansus

. . . .Stip. 125
Stip. 126, 190
. .. .Stip. 126
Stip. 124

concinnus
confusus

Stip. 173
Stip. 177
Stip 170

paulensis
polydactylus.. . .
Preussii

corylinus

craterellus

Stip. 177

pudens
rhinocerotis
Rhipidium
rhizomatophorus
rutrosus
sacer
scopulosus

. . . .Stip. 126
....Stip. 122
. .. .Stip. 131
. . . .Stip. 126
. .. .Stip. 130
Stip. 122
Stip. 128, 190
....Stip. 122
... .Stip. 128

. . .M. N. 442

. . Phal. 38
Phal. 38
Phal. 40
Phal. 40
. .Phal. 36

cryptopus
favoloides
floridcus

Stip. 170
Stip. 174
Stip 173

fuscidulus

Stip. 171

gracilis
guaraniticus. . . .
incomptus
irinus

Stip. 176
.... .Stip. 171
.Stip. 173, 195
Stip. 172
Stip. 176
Stip. 171
Stip. 170

superpositus. . . .
zambesianus. . . ;
Lycoperdon
abscissum
Lysurus
Australiensis ....
borealis
Clarazianus
cruciatus
Gardneri. .

lentus
lepideus
leptocephalus

Marmellosensis.
nanus
orbicularis

Stip. 176
Stip. 174
Stip. 176

partitus

Stip. 175, 195

Peckianus. .

. .Stio. 171

INDEX OF PRINCIPAL SPECIES

Lysurus — Continued.
Mokusin Phal. 36
Sanctae-Catherinae . . .Phal. 40
Woodii Phal. 40
M6ljinopus

Merismus — Continued,
giganteus Stip. 151
graveolens Stip. 154
lithophylloides Stip. 152
miniatus Stip 154

admirabilis Stip. 180
albiceps .Stip. 180

montanus Stip. 148
multiplex Stip. 152

blanchetianus Stip. 180
dictyopus Stip. 180
elegans Stip. 180
Gayanus Stip. 185

fetiporus Stip. 154
Ridleyi Stip. 152
sordulentus Stip. 154
sulphureus . . .Stip. 153

Guilfoylei Stip. 186, 195
Guyanensis Stip. 183

Talpae Stip. 149
umbellatus Stip. 150

Hartmanni Stip. 195
hemicapnodes Stip. 182
hydniceps Stip. 183

Wynnei Stip. 150
zelandicus Stip. 149
Mutinus

lateratus Stip. 185

argentinus Phal. 32

Leprieurii Stip. 183
leprodes Stip. 180
malnominus Stip. 187

bambusinus, Phal. 28, M. N. 505
borneensis Phal. 32
caninus Phal. 28

marasmioides Stip. 184
melanopus Stip. 180
melanopus (bis) Stip. 186
nephridius Stip. 185
palpebralis Stip. 184
Paucheri Stip. 180
picipes Stip. 180
podlachicus Stip. 183
pusillus. . . . Stip. 185

curtus Phal. 32
elegans Phal. 28
Fleischeri Phal. 28
minimus Phal. 32
papuasius Phal. 32
pentagonus Phal. 30
proximus Phal. 32
Ravenelii Phal. 28
xylogenus Phal. 30

Puttemansii Stip 183

Ovinus

radiato-scruposus . . . .Stip. 187
rhizomorphus Stip. 182
rubro-castaneus Stip. 183
vadosus Stip. 183
varius Stip. 180
veluticeps Stip. 182
vernicosus Stip 182

Boucheanus. .Stip. 168, Ov. 86
caeruliporus, Stip. 167, Ov. 79
confluens,
Stip. 167, Ov. 81, Ov. 92
cristatus,
Stip. 167, Ov. 80, Ov. 92
discoideus Stip 167 Ov 82

Warburgianus . . .Stip. 186, 195
Wrightii Stip 183

Ellisii Stip. 168, Ov. 84
Goetzii Stip 166 Ov 74

xerophyllus Stip. 186
Merismus
anthracophilus Stip. 152
Berkeleyi Stip. 148
Colensoi Stip. 152
cremeo-tomentosus. . .Stip. 152
dispansus Stip. 192
fimbriatus Stip. 152, 192
frondosus Stip. 150

griseus Stip. 167, Ov. 78
Hartmanni,
Stip. 168, Ov. 87, 92
lentinoides. . .Stip. 168, Ov. 85
leucomelas. . .Stip. 167, Ov. 77
Mylittae, Stip. 167, Ov. 76, 92
ovinus Stip. 167, Ov. 76
Pes caprae . . .Stip. 167, Ov. 83
politus Stip. 167, Ov. 79

INDEX OF PRINCIPAL SPECIES

Ovinus — Continued.

popanoides. . .Stip. 167, Ov. 82

radicatus Stip. 168, Ov. 87

Rostkovii Stip. 168

sapurema. . . .Stip. 166, Ov. 75
squamatus. . .Stip. 168, Ov. 84
squamosus. . .Stip. 168, Ov. 85
Tasmanicus. .Stip. 168, Ov. 87
tuberaster, Stip. 166, Ov. 74, 92
tumulosus. . . .Stip. 168, Ov. 86

Pelloporus

cinnamomeus Stip. 164

Cumingii Stip. 162

cuticularis Stip. 165

decurrens Stip. 164

dependens Stip. 165

focicola Stip. 164

hamatus Stip. 195

indicus Stip. 162

luteo-nitidus Stip. 162

multiformis Stip. 163

oblectabilis Stip. 164

oblectans Stip. 164

oblivionis Stip. 164

orientalis Stip. 193

perennis Stip. 164

pictus Stip. 164

turboformis Stip. 194

vallatus Stip. 162

Petaloides

affinis Stip. 142

albellus Stip. 137

antilopus Stip. 142

aratoides Stip. 135

armenicolor Stip. 142

asperulus Stip. 134

biokoensis Stip. 131

brachyporus Stip. 132

brachypus Stip. 134

brunneolus Stip. 133

brunneo-maculatus. . .Stip. 133

candidus Stip. 132

carneo-niger Stip. 143

cayennensis Stip. 136

cinnabarinus Stip. 144

cinnamomeo-squamulosus,

Stip. 138
cochleariformis Stip. 139

Petaloides — Continued.

conchifer Stip. 145

Didrichensii Stip. 133

discipes Stip. 135

dorcadideus Stip. 137

Emerici Stip. 137

favoloides Stip. 137

flabelliformis Stip. 143

fractipes Stip. 131, 191

fusco-lineatus Stip. 137

gallopavonis Stip. 134

Gaudichaudii Stip. 134

Glaziovii Stip. 135

grammocephalus Stip. 136

hirtus Stip. 130

hclotephrus Stip. 142

incurvus Stip. 134

Janseanus Stip. 132

luteus Stip. 142

maculatus Stip. 137

makuensis Stip. 142

maliencis Stip. 135

marianus Stip. 134

megaloporus Stip. 138

modestus Stip. 133, 191

Musashiensis. . . .Stip. 135, 191

mutabilis Stip. 141

nivicolor Stip. 131

obliquus Stip. 132

obovatus Stip. 141

osseus Stip. 191

penetralis Stip. 132

perversus Stip. 136, 191

petaliformis Stip. 142

petalodes Stip. 133

platotis Stip. 137

pocula Stip. 140

porphyritis Stip. 142

pterygodes Stip. 143

pusiolus Stip. 140

rubidus Stip. 133, 191

russiceps Stip. 138

sanguineus Stip. 144

siennaecolor Stip. 144

stereinus Stip. 142

subfulvus Stip. 144

tristiculus Stip. 139

vernicipes Stip. 144

INDEX OF PRINCIPAL SPECIES

Phallogaster

saccatus
Phallus

callichrous
calyptratus

. . .Phal. 71

. .Phal. 20
Phal. 22

Polystictus

affinis
campyloporus.
carneo-niger . .
conchifer
cichoriaceus . .
cinnamomeus .
circinatus ....
concinnus ....
cuticularis. . . .
decurrens. . . .
dependens. . . .

. . . .Mic. 53
Tab. 60
Mic. 54
.M. N. Pol. 41
Tab. 60
.M. N. Pol. 6
M. N. Pol. 2
Mic. 51
M. N. Pol. 12
M. N. Pol. 12
M. N. Pol. 12
M. N. Pol. 4

campanulatus. . . .
canariensis
celebicus
costatus
daemonum
discolor
duplicatus

.. .Phal. 22
.. .Phal. 22
. .Phal. 22
. . .Phal. 10
. . .Phal. 20
. .. .Phal. 22
. . . .Phal. 20
. . . .Phal. 24
. .. .Phal. 14
. . . .Phal. 18
Phal. 14

Farlowii
favosus
glutinolens
gracilis

Dybowski. . . .
flabelliformis..
florideus
focicola
Holstii
iodinus
leoninus
lutescens
luteus
obesus
perennis
pinsitus
porphyritis

Fun. 65
Mic. 55
Mic. 51
.M. N. Pol. 8
Mic. 52
Tab. 60
Fun. 64
. .M. N. 468
Mic. 53
.M. N. Pol. 11
.M. N. Pol. 7
. .M. N. Pol. 26
.Mic. 54

imperialis,. . Phal. 10, M. N. 508
impudicus, M. N. 508, Phal. 10
indusiatus Phal. 18
Mauritianus Phal. 22
Moelleri Phal. 20
multicolor Phal. 20
quadri color Phal. 24
Ravenelii Phal. 14
retusus Phal. 22
Rochesterensis Phal. 20
roseus Phal. 20
rubicundus Phal. 14
rugulosus Ph;il 18

proliferus . .M. N. Pol. 8
pseudo-perennis Mic. 53
pterygodes Mic. 56
setiporus Tab. 60
simillimus M. N. Pol. 8
stupeus - - - Fun. 65

subuculatus
subtilis
tenuis

. .. .Phal. 22
. .. .Phal. 18
. .. .Phal. 10

N., Old. 4

N., Pol. 36
. .M. N. 458
. 28, Ov. 84
N. Pol. 38
N. Pol. 44
..M. N. 467
N. Pol. 22
[. N. Pol. 13
M. N. Pol.24
. N. Pol. 36
N. Pol. 24

tabacinus ....
tomentosus

Tab. 59
M. N. Pol. 2

Physalacria

inflata M.
Polyporus
Berkeleyi. . . .M.
Braunii

trichomallus. .
xanthopus. . . .
Poria
nitida
taxicola
Pseudocolus
fusiformis. . . .
Garciae

Fun. 66
Mic. 50

. .M. N. 472
M. N. 473

Phal. 53

Ellisii, M. N. Pol
montanus. . . .M.
pocula M
Rheades
Rhipidium. . . .M.
Schweinitzii .... IV
subpulverulentus,
Talpae M
volvatus M.

Phal. 52

Javanicus. . . .
Rothae
rugulosus
Ptychogaster
albus

Phal. 52
Phal. 53
Phal. 52

M. N. Pol. 31

hepaticus. . . .

. . .M. N. Pol. 32

INDEX OF PRINCIPAL SPECIES

Schizophyllum

commune M.

Simblum

clathratum

gracile

Mullen

periphragmoides. . .
sphaerocephalum . .

texense

Spongiosus

Albertinii

anthelminticus

circinatus

distortus

fragilissimus

heteroporus

hystriculus

leporinus

N. Old. 3

. .Phal. 67
. .Phal. 66
..Phal. 67
. .Phal. 66
. .Phal. 67
. .Phal. 67

. .Stip. 160
. .Stip. 158
. .Stip. 159
. .Stip. 158
. .Stip. 160
. .Stip. 158
. .Stip. 158
. .Stip. 160

Spongiosus — Continued

Montagnei Stip. 160

pachypus Stip. 159

Puiggarianus Stip. 160

Repsoldi Stip. 159

rufescens Stip. 157

Schweinitzii Stip. 159

sideroides : . .Stip. 160

sub-bulbipes Stip. 161

tomentosus Stip. 160

triqueter Stip. 160

Trametes

cervinus M. N. 470

Tremella

aurantia M. N. Old. 11

clavariodes M. N. Old. 10

Trogia

crispa M. N. Old. 1

SECONDARY INDEX.

Index to species mentioned incidentally in the text.

Aseroe

rubra .................... M. N. 424

Battarrea

Gaudichaudii ............. M. N. 441

Bovistella

paludosa ................. M. X. 435

Calvatia

rubroflava ............... M. N. 441

Cecidomyia

Cupressi ................. M. N. 497

Clathrus

cancellatus ............... M. N. 424

cibarius .................. M. N. 424

guttulatus ............... M. N. 424

pusillus .................. M. N. 424

Treubei .................. M. N. 424

Cyathus

Poeppigii ........... M. N. 441, 455

stercoreus ................ N. M. 455

Daedalea

juniperinus ........ Note 21, Let. 38

pallido-fulva ............. M. N. 423

Enteridium

M. X. 506
M. N. 506

Rozeanum
splendens
Favolus

alutaceus .......... M. N.

Pol. 19
Boucheanus ........... M. N. Pol. 19

Junghuhnii ................. Let. 36.

multiplex ................... Let. 36.

spathulatus ................. Let. 37

Fistulina

pallida

M N Old 8

Fomes

conchatus
Euonymi
fomentarius
graveolens
Haskarlii

M. N. 469
M. X. 469
M. X. 469
..Note 19, Let. 35
Let. 36
M N 443

roseus
Geaster

..Note 12, Let. 32
M X 441

Hirneola

auriculae- Judae. . .
delica

..M. X. 495
Let. 37

Hydnum

Note 16, Let. 35

M. N. 475

Inonotus

Bankeri
Itajahya
galericulata
Jansia
rugosa
Kalchbrennera
corallocephala
Laschia
cucullata
pustulosus
Lentinus
tigrinus

M. N. 475
M. N. 441
M. N. 424
M. N. 482

...Let. 37
Let. 37

...M. N. Old. 8

SECONDARY INDEX

Lenzites

Polyporus — Continued

murinus

Let. 36

lucidus

..M. N. Pol. 32

platyphylla . . .

Let. 36

miniatus

Let. 37

protracta

Note 1, Let. 29

obovatus

Let. 37

Lycoperdon

osseus

. Note 5, Let. 32

pratense

,..M. N. 439

Palliser

. Note 8, Let. 32

umbrinum ....

M. N. 438

PCS Caprae

M. N. 467

Lysurus

Gardneri

..M. N. 424

P°ri.Pes
pusillus

M. N. 423
Let. 36

Woodii

M. N. 482

radiatus

M. N. 467

Macowanites

Ravenelii

M. N. 424

agaricinus. . . .

M. N. 424

resinosus

M. N. 490

Merulius

Rhipidium

..M. N. Pol. 33

brassicaef olius .

..M. N. 422

roseo-alba

Let. 37

confluens .

M N 422

rutilans

M N 468

incarnatus. . . .

! M. N. 422

salignus

Note 15, Let. 35

Mutinus

Sartwellii

M. N. 423

bambu sinus

M N 424

SCT UpOSUS

M. N. 424

caninus

..M. N. 424

scutellatus

M. X. 422

elegans

M. N. 424

sideroides

Let. 36

Panus

spectabilis

M. N. 423

rudis

Note 6, Let. 32

spissus

M. N. 422

Phallus

superficialis

M. N. 422

impudicus

M N 424

tropicus

Let. 37

indusiatus. . . .

.M. N. 424, 453, 482

tuberaster

M. N. 468

irpicoides

M. N 424

Tulipiferus

M. N. 422

Phellorina

umbellatus

..M. N. Pol. 32

argentinensis. .

M. N. 441

varius

M N. 468

Pleurotus

viscosus

. . .M. N. 468

nidulans

.M. N. 440

viticola

M. N. 422

Polyporus

Zelandicus

..M. N. Pol. 40

adustus

M. N. 466

Polystictus

annulatus

Let. 37

abietinus

..M. N. 468

barbatulus. . . .

M. N. 424

anisophilus

Let. 36

Berkeley!

M. N. 424

biformis

M. N. 446

betulinus

M. N. 466

Blumei

Let. 36

bicolor

Let. 37

cinnabarinus

M. X. 468

Boucheanus. . .

M. N. Pol. 19

confertus

Let. 36

carneus

Note 12, Let. 32

dermatodeus

..M. N. Pol. 27

cervinus

M. N. 422

fimbriatus

Mote 20, Let. 35

confluens

M N 466

. N. 450, Let. 37

cristatus

Note 2, Let. 29

oblectans

. . . M. N. Pol. 7

croceus

Note 4, Let. 29

pellucidus

Let. 37

cubensis

Note 9, Let. 32

perennis

M. N. 469

cuticularis

M. N. 466

pergamenus

M. N. 446

Dickinsii

M. N. Pol. 40

venulosus

Let. 37

dryadeus

M. N. 490

versicolor

M. N. 469

dryophilus. . . .

M. N. 423

Poria

durus

Let. 37

bibula

. .M. N. 471

eurocephalus.

M. N. Pol. 40

brunnea

M. N. 471

Feei

Notes 7, 12, Let. 32

byssina

M. N. 471

floccosus

Let. 37

byssogena

Let. 37

f rondos us

M. N. 467

contigua

M. N. 471

fumosus. . M. IS

. 467, Note 15, Let. 35

colliculosa

M. N. 471

galactinus

M. N. 423

cribosa

M. N. 471

giganteus

M. N. Pol. 32

cruenta

M. N. 471

gilvus

Note 22, Let. 38

Crustacea

Let. 37

Hartmanni. . .

Note 18, Let. 35

dentipora

M. N. 471

hispidus

M. N. 467

ferrea

M. N. 471

leucomelas. . . .

M. N. 467

f usco-carnea

. .M. N. 472

10

SECONDARY INDEX

Poria — Continued

Stereum

fasciatum Xote 3 Let 29

incrustans M. N. 472
Medulla-panis M. X. 472
mollusca M. N. 472
mucida M N 472

versicolor M X 429 Xote 3 Let 29

Theleporus
cretaceus M. X. 479

Trametes

asper Let. 37
lactea M. X. 424
odoratus M. X. 470
pini M. X. 470
suaveolens M. X. 470
zebrina M. X. 424

Tremella

fusiformis M. X. Old. 11

Xylaria

tentaculata Xote 10, Let. 32

salicina M. N. 472
umbrina M. X. 473
vcrsipora M. N. 473
Porothelium
fimhriatum M. N. 472
laccrum M. N. 423
Pseudocolus

Schizophyllum

Simblum
periphragmoides M. N. 424, 451
Texense M. X. 451

INDEX TO MISCELL

Aetnensis, A New Genus M. X. 460
Amateur Work M. X. 459
American Species named by
Fries M. X. 423
Another "Fungus" Gone
Wrong M. N. 497
Berkeley's Species M. N. 423
Boudier, Monsieur Emile. . . .M. X. 494
Bovista, The Exoperidium of,M. X. 453
Bovistella, A Xe\v Type in
the Genus " M. N. 457
Bovistella paludosa, Redis-
covery of M. N. 435
Bovistella with a Geaster
Mouth, A M. N. 452
Bresadolla, L. Abbe G M. N. 462
Broomeia, A Xew M. X. 436
Clathrus cibarius M. X. 447
Clautriavia merulina, The
Veil of M. X. 449
Cui Bono? M. X. 452
Curious Home for Insects, A.M. X. 506
Cyanosporus, A Xew Genus. .M. X. 4.>6
Cyclomyces, The Genus M. X. 4S7
Deceptive "Fungus," A M. X. 507
Directions for making a Mu-
seum of Fungi M. X. 486
Duplicate Xames M. N. 439
Durand's Paper on Geoglos-
saceae M. X. 433

ANEOUS SUBJECTS.

Fomes torulosus in America,
M. X. Pol. 48
Fries, Elias Magnus M. X. 414
Fries' Herbarium M. X. 417
Fries, Life of M. X. 414
Fries, Klas Robert Elias M. X. 419
Fries, Oscar Robert M. X. 419
Fries, Theodor Magnus M. X. 419
Fungi, A Xew Work on M. X. 448
Fungus in Commerce M. X. 495
Geoglossaceae, Durand's
Paper on M. X. 433
Greene, B. D M. X. 498
Hard's Book, Professor M. N. 429
Hennings, Paul M. X. 426
Hexagona cucullata M. X. Pol. 22
Hexagonas M. X. 500
Hexagona, The Genus. . . .M. X. Pol. 21
Identity of Phallus rugulosus, M. X. 458
Irpex flavus "Klotz," and
Polystictus flavus "Junsjh." M. X. 450

Kellerman. Professor \V. A. , . M. N: 478
Klincksieck, Paul M. N. 496
Law Makers, Our M. N. 428

Laws, Our Latest, "By Au-
thority" M. N. 478
Les Soucis d'un Mycologue. .M. N. 454
Lycogalopsis, The Genus M. N. 482
Martella, The Xew Genus. . .M. N. 457
Massee, Professor M. N. 446
Matula, The Genus M. N. 443
Mauritius, The Phalloids of. .M. X. 508
Myxomvcetes of Samoa M. N. 506
Xaturalist a Sane Man. The..M. X. 459
Xews from our Lawmakers.. .M. X. 504
Xidulariaceae at Berlin, The .M. N. 455
Xotes of Travel, Berlin M. N. 426

European Mare's Xest, A. . M. X. 459
Exoperidium of Bovista, The.M. N. 453
Favolus, The Genus M. X. Pol. 17
Fcmsjo in Fries' Day M. X. 480
Fistulina, The Genus... M. X. Old. 5
Fomes applanatus and Fomes
leucophaeus M. X. 437

11

MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTS

Old Species, Some M.

Persoon's Herbarium, The
Polypores of

Phalloids in the Museum of
Upsala

Phalloids of Mauritius, The

Phalloids, recently received
from Correspondents, Re-
sume of

Phalloids, South African. . .

Phallus imperialis and Phallus
impudicus

Phallus indusiatus as food . . .

Pleurotus nidulans is fetid . . .

Polypores of Persoon's

Herbarium, The

Polyporoid Genus, A New . . .

Polyporoids, Some Note-
worthy M.

Polyporoids, Two Mammoth,
M.

Polystictus (Section Pello-
porus) M

INDEX TO CONTRIBUTORS' NAMES.

The liberality with which my friends and correspondents have
sent specimens for study has been the chief means of advancing
my knowledge of the subject. It is only through an abundance of
specimens from various localities, that any subject can be learned.
The numbers in the following list refer to the Letters where a detailed
account of the specimens will be found.

N. Old. 1

Polyporus that Weeps, A M. N. 490

Polystictus villosus and

.M. N. 464

Polystictus pinsitus. . . .M. N. Pol. 47

.M. N. 424

Prof. McGinty, Identity of Let. 38
Pseudocolus Javanicus in

.M. N. 508

Formosa M. N. 456

Ptychogaster, The Genus. M. N. Pol. 30

Puff Balls from South

.M. N. 476

America, New M. N. 441

.M. N. 482

Re-examination needed, A. . .M. N. 473

s

Schweinitz' Specimens M. N. 422

.M. N. 508

Simblums, Yellow M. N. 451

.M. N. 507

Sphaerobolus, How it throws

.M. N. 440

its Peridiole M. N. 431

Theleporous, The Genus M. N. 479

.M. N. 464

Torrend. The Rev. C. S. J. ..M. N. 498

.M. N. 444

Type Locality, The M. N. 505

Type .Species, The M. N. 456

N. Pol. 22

Variation of the Cortex and

Species, The M. N. 438

N. Pol. 34

Wanted— A Good Color BookM. N. 439

What a long tail our cat does

I. N. Pol. 1

have! M. N. 492

Abbott, Dr. E. K., California

Acloque, A., France

Aiken, W. H., Ohio 29, 30,

Allen, Miss Lizzie C., Massachu-
setts 29,

Allen, D. B., England

Allen, W. B., England 28, 30,

Ames, Frank H., New York 29,

Arnould, Monsieur, France

Baker, C. F., California

Baker, C. H., Florida

Ball, Carleton R., Texas...

Ballou, W. H., New York 29,

Barbier, Maurice, France 25,

Barker, W. E., New Zealand .30, 31,

Bartlett, H. H., Georgia

Bartlett, Harley H., Massachusetts.. .

Bates, Rev. J. M., Nebraska 26,

Beardslee, H. C., North Caro-
lina 29, 30,

Becker, Dr. H., South Africa,. 27, 28,

Bellaing, J. de, England 28,

Bernard, Dr. Chas., Java 25,

Bernin, A., Monaco. . .

30 [ Bertolet, A. S., Canada 30

28 Bessey, Dr. E. A., Michigan 38

38 j Bezzi, Dr. M., Italy 30

Biers, Monsieur, France, Paul. . . .27, 38

30 | Blackford, Mrs. E. B., Massa-

27 i chusetts 29, 30

31 ; Blandenier, A., Egypt 38

30 Bonnet, E., France 30

27 ! Bonnet, Paul, France 25

29 | Boudier, E., France 28

30 Brace, I. J. K., Bahamas 25

30 Braendle, F. J., Washington, D. C. 30, 38

30 Brandis, Rev. E. Bosnia 25

30 | Braun, Dr. K., German, Africa. . .31, 33

38 Braun, Lucy, Ohio 38

26 j Brenckle, Dr. J. F., North

29 Dakota 26, 29, 34

34 Bresadola, Rev. G., Austria 30

: Brown, Chas. E., Wisconsin 26, 30

38 I Brown, Geo., New Zealand. . .28, 35, 38

35 Burchard, Dr. O., Canary Islands. . . .38
34 Burnham, Stewart A., New York. 29, 30

28 Butignot, Dr., Switzerland 25, 30

27 Cahn, Mrs. J. A., Michigan 34

12

CONTRIBUTORS' .NAMES

Camus, F., France

Carne, W. M., N. S. Wales..

Castillon, Leon, Argentina

Cavanagh, B. S., India . .

Cavara, Fr., Italy

Cave, G. H., India

Cepede, C., France

Chadwick, Wm., Jamaica

Cheel, E., Australia

Cheeseman, W. N., Canada
Chestennow, N., Russia. .

Clarke, J. F., Iowa

Clute, W. N., Illinois....
Compton, J. S., Illinois. .
Cook, Mel. T., Delaware.
Coons, G. H., Nebraska.
Cotton, A. D., England. .
Cradwick, Wm., Jamaica. .
Grassland, Charles, England,
27,28

Dallas, Mrs. Geo. M., Penm.
Davis, Simon, Massachusetts,

Dearness, John, Canada. . .
Demetrio, C. H., Missouri.
Dessenon, Monsieur, France
Dobbin, Frank, New York.
Drake, Henry C., England
Dumee, Monsieur, France . .
Dupain, V., France.
Dupont, E., Reunion Island
Dupret, H., Canada. . .
Dutra, Dr. Joao, Brazil
Edgerton, C. W., Louisiana
Edwards, S. C., North Carolina.
Evans, I. B., Pole, South Africa
Evans, T. B., Transvaal. . .
Eyre, Rev. W. L. W., England,

Fairman, C. E., New York
Fawcett, H. S., Florida. .
Fink, Dr. Bruce, Ohio. ..
Felippone, Dr. F., Uruguay
Fisher, G. C., Ohio.
Fisher, G. C., New York. .

Fisher, G. C., Florida

Fisher, G. C., Maryland
Fischer, O. E., Michigan...
Fitzgerald, Miss Mary, North

Carolina

Flockton, Miss Margare
Forbes, C. N., Hawaii. .
Fowler, James, Canada.
Fries, Robert E. Sweden. . . .
Froggatt, Walter W. Solomon

Islands

Fry, Miss Agnes, England. . .
Gallagher, W. J., Malay States. . .
Garman, H., Kentucky
Garrett, A. O., Utah. . .

27

Gibbs, Thomas, England 27

es 38

Gillet, Rev. J., Congo, Beige 38

a 38

Glatfclter, N M Missouri 34

.. .27, 38

Goessel, Chas., Wisconsin 26

35

Goethart, J. W., Holland 28

.31,32,33, 35

Gono, M., Japan 31, 32

25,27

Gossweiler, John, Africa 30

38

Grelet, L. J., France 27, 30

31

Griffin, D. B., Vermont. . .29, 30, 34, 38

da... 27, 30, 38

Griffiths, David, D. C 30, 38

34

Hadley, Mrs. A. M., Vermont. . . .29, 30

30

Haglund, Erik, Sweden 27

26

Hall, J. G., North Carolina 29

30,38

Hamilton, A. G., New South Wales. .38

29

Hanmer, C. C., Connecticut 30, 34

30

Hariot, P., France 25, 27, 28, 30, 34

....28,30, 32

Harper, E. T., Illinois 30

28

Harrison, Catharine, Pennsylvania. . .30

nd,

Hassler, F. A., Colorado 29, 30

, 28, 30, 32, 34

Hawley, H. C., England 28, 30, 34

mnsylvania . 30

Hcald, F. D., Texas 29

etts,

Hedgcock, Geo. G., Washington,

26, 29, 30, 38

D. C 29

29,30,38

Hemet, L., Algiers 28, 30

-i 30

Hempel, A., Brazil 38

nee 25,27

Henderson, Dr. W. H., California. . . .34

k 30

Hill, Oscar, Massachusetts. . . .26, 29, 30

d 28

Hone, Daisy M., Massachusetts 26

e 27,34

Hornell, J., Palni Hills, India 38

30

Howell, George T., Indiana 29

nd 27

Hrdlicka, Dr. A., Argentina 30

30,38

Humphrey, C. G., Wisconsin 38

38

Hutchings, S. Bengal 27, 28, 35

na 29

Hy, F. France 30

irolina 30

Irani, J. H., India. 38

Africa 38

aap, Professor Otto, Germany 25

31

ackson, H. S., New Jersey 26

gland,

aczewski, Prof. A. Von, Russia 31

28, 30, 38

ahandiez, M. E., France 27, 31

-k 30

ames, David L., Ohio 30

30

arvis, E., Queensland 27, 31, 33

30

" oliet High School, Illinois 30

ay 31, 33

ones, Miss Kate A., New

26

Hampshire 29, 30, 38

26, 30
29

Jones, Mrs. W. C., Washington 34
Karsten, P. A., Finland 30

34, 38

Kaufmann, C. M., Michigan 30

29

Kawamura, Professor S., Japan 34

forth

Killgore, Anthony, New Jersey. . 29, 30

30

Kirtikar, Col. K. R., India.. . .31, 32, 33

Australia. .35

Klincksieck, Paul, France 25

38

Knox, Wm., Ohio 30

26, 29

Koningsberger, Dr. J. C., Java 38

28,30

Kreke, Rev. Marcus, Ohio 29, 38

mon

Kriiger, W., Germany 30

27,30

Kuyper, Dr. J., Surinam 38

d 28

Laing, H. W., New Zealand 28

States 25

Lakin, W. T., Maryland 29

29

Lane, R. H., (Jcillfornici 26

26, 29, 30

Langton, Thos., Canada.. .26, 29, 30, 38

13

CONTRIBUTORS' NAMES

Langton, Thos., Trinidad

Lantis, Vernon, Ohio

Laughlin, Miss Emma E., Ohio

Learn, Clarence D., Iowa

Lehman, E. A., North Carolina

Levy, Miss Daisy J., New York. . . .
Lind. J. Denmark 27

.38
.38
.30
.2')
.20
.30

28
.25
, 38
.29

34

34

38
.3]
.30
.3Q
.34
35
27
26

30
38
29

Lloyd, Dr. F. E., Mexico

Lloyd, John Uri, Ohio 30

Lordley, E. D., Nova Scotia

Ludwig, Monsieur, France. . . .25, 28
Luja, Edouard, Congo Beige,

31, 32, 33

McAlpine, D., Australia 28, 31

Macbride, Professor T. H., Iowa. . . .
Mackintosh, R. B., Massachusetts. .

Macoun, John, Canada

Maingaud, E., France

Maire, Professor R., France.. .27, 28,

Mangin, Professor, France

Marsh, Joseph W., Oregon

Massalongo, Professor C.,

Italy 25,27,

Mattirolo, Professor, Italy

Medcalf, B. G., Minnesota

Menezes, Carlos A., Maderia

Islands 28, 31

Mignault, Rev. Jos. B., Canada 29

Mille, Rev. L., Ecuador 25

Miller, R., Iowa 38

Milner, Dr. S. G., Michigan 30

Morris, Geo. E., Massachusetts.. 29, 30

Mousset, J. P., Java 38

Navas, Rev. L. Spain 25

Nelson, N. L. T., Iowa 29, 30, 38

Nespor, Mr., Bohemia 35

Newberry, W. J., Natal, South

Africa 38

Noble, Mrs. M. A., Florida, 26, 29, 30, 38
O'Connor, Charles A.,

Mauritius 25, 27, 31, 32, 33

Olivier, Ernest, France 31

Overholts L. O.. Ohio 30, 38

Panau, Charles, France. . .27, 28, 31, 35

Parish, S. B., California 38

Patouillard, Professor N.,

France 25, 27, 28

Patterson, W. H., West Indies 31

Paul, J. T., Australia 31, 33

Pazschke, Dr. O., Germany 30

Peckolt, Gustave, Brazil 38

Pepper, C. W., Rhode Island 38

Percival, Mrs. M. A., Florida 29 30
Fetch, T., Ceylon. 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35

Pierrhugues, Dr., France 25, 27

Plitt, Charles C., Maryland 30

Pool, R. J., Nebraska 30

Rankin, W. H., New York, 30

Rea, Carleton, England 28, 30

Reader, F. M., Victoria 25, 31

Rick, Rev. J., Brazil,

27, 30. 31, 32, 33, 35

Ricker, P. L., Washington, D. C

Riddle, L. W., Massachusetts

Robert, Docteur, France

Rodriguez y Lopez Neyra, Dr. M.,
Spain

Rogers, E. O., Iowa

Rolfe, F. W., England

Rolfs, P. H., England 28,

Rolfs, P. H., Florida

Ropes, Willis H., Massachusetts. . . .

Rousseau, Madame, Belgium ... .27,

Ryan, H. Val., India

S. F. E., New York

Salmon, E. S., England

Scarfe, W. A., New Zealand

Schumo, S. L., Pennsylvania 30,

Setchell, W. A., California

Shadwell, Miss B., England

Smith, E. Hartley, England

Smith, G. D., Kentucky 30,

Smith, T. L., Massachusetts

Smith, Theodate L., New Hampshire

Sterling, E. B., New Jersey. .26, 30,

Stevens, F. L., North Carolina

Stirling, Edward C., Australia

Stockberger, W.W., Washington, D.C.,

Storer, Miss E. D., Pennsylvania. . . .

Stover, W. G., Ohio

Streeter, Mrs. Hannah, Pennsyl-
vania 29,

Sutliff, Miss Mary L., California. .29,

Suksdorf, W. N., Washington

Swanton, E. W., England 28,

Swope, Dr. Eugene, Ohio

Tate, J. M., Iowa

Tepper, J. G. O., South Australia. . . .

Thorncroft, Geo., Transvaal, South
Africa

Trask, Mrs. Blanche, California

True, Dr. H. L., Ohio. .

Turner, Miss E. J., Australia 27,

Umemura, Jintaro, Japan

Unknown Donor 31,

Ussher, C. B., Straits Settlements,

27, 30, 31, 33, 34,

Van Bambeke, Prof. Chas.,

Belgium 25, 27,

Vanderyst, Rev. Hyac., Congo

Beige 31, 32,

Walker, Miss I. M., Canada 29,

Warner, H. E., New Hampshire

Wasteneys, H., Australia

Weidman, Ant., Bohemia.. 28, 30, 31,

Westgate, J. M., Texas

Whetstone, Dr. M. S., Minne-
sota 29, 30, 34,

Wilder, Charlotte M., California

Williams, Miss Cora, Kentucky

38

.20
.29
.30

.27

'25
34
30
38
30
38
38
28
38
38

28

28
38
26
30
34
38
38

29
30

30
30
,34

34
.34
38
25

38
34

30
31

38
35

38
30

33
30

30
27
35
30

38
38
38

14

CONTRIBUTORS' NAMES

Wilson, Rev. James, Aus-
tralia

Wood, J. Medley, Africa
W7ooton, E. O., New Mexico
Woulff, E., Austria

Woulff, E., Russia 30, 38

27, 30, 38 Wyman, Miss Edith, Iowa 38

. . .31, 35 Yasuda, Prof. A., Japan 38

30 Yoshinaga, T., Japan 31, 32, 33

25 i Zenker, G., Africa 31, 32, 38

INDEX TO SYNONYMS AND JUGGLED NAMES.

Index of Synonyms, Plants imperfectly described, imperfectly
known, or based on imperfect material. Also juggled names.

In our "Synopsis of the Known Phalloids," "Synopsis of the
Genus Hexagona," and "Synopsis of the Sections of Polyporus and
Polystictus," we have given lists alphabetically of the synonyms in
those sections. We have not repeated these synonyms in this index.

It does not follow that all the species included in the following
list are invalid species. Some of them are correct in other genera,
and are placed here when wrongly classified generically.

Cantharellus

Femes

Cupressi

.M. N. 497

fomentarius var. appl<

inatus.M. \.469

Corticioides

Palliseri

. Note 8, Let. 32

rcticulcitum

M

N. Old. 10

perpusillus

Let 36

Corticium

ribesius

M. X. 470

tremellinum var.
reticulatum

M

N. Old. 11

Gloeoporus

pusillus

. .M. N. Pol. 33

Corynites

Rhipidium

..M. N. Pol. 24

brevis

.M. N. 424

Hexagona

Cyphella

Blumei

. . . Let. 36

Cupressi

.M. N. 497

Friesiana

...M. X. Pol. 28

Cyathus

macrotrema

Let. 37

globosus

.M. N. 455

Molkenboeri

Let. 36

niveo-tomentosus

.M. N. 455

pulchella

Let. 36

plicatulus

.M. N. 455

sericea

M. N. Pol. 28..

plicatus

.M. N. 441

vittata

. .M. X. Pol. 33

scutellaris

.M. N. 455

Irpex

sulcatus . . .

M N 455

flavus

M. X. 450

Daedalea

Laschia

aulaxina
flavida
indica
Kansensis No
lurida
splendens
unicolor var. hydnoidea

te,

Let. 36
Let. 36
. . . . Let. 37
21, Let. 38
Let. 36
Let. 36
M. N 451

Crustacea
spathulatus
Lentinus
Lecomptei
Lenzites
Junghuhnii
vialis

Let. 37
Let. 37

.Note 6, Let. 32

Let. 36
.Note 1, Let. 29

Enslinia

Leotia

inflata

. . . M. X. Old. 4

Leprieurii

M

N. Pol. 45

Merulius

Pocula

M

N. Pol. 45

affinis

. .Let. 37

Favolus

alveolarius

..M. N. Pol. 19

Canadensis

M

N. Pol. 19

cucullata

Let. 37

curtipes

M

N. Pol. 22

Cupressi

M. N. 497

Ohiensis

M

N. Pol. 19

daedaleus

..M. N. Pol. 21

peltatus

Let. 36

fagineus

...M. N. Old. 2

pustulosus

...Let. 37

Mitrula

Rhipidium

\I

N. Pol. 24

inflata

...M. N. Old. 4

striatulus

M

N. Pol. 20

Panus

Taxodii

M

N. Pol. 22

Hoffmanni

.Note 6, Let. 32

tener

Let. 36

Swainsonii

.Note 6, Let. 32

15

SYNONYMS AND JUGGLED NAMES

Phallogaster

Whitei

M. N. 503

Polyporus — Continued
punctatus
pusillus
rhodophaeus

Let. 37
..M. N. Pol. 24
Let. 36
Let. 36

Phallus

rugulosus
Polyporus

abnormis
acanthoides
albo-marginatus. . . .

M. N. 458

...Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 38
Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 38
. Note 8, Let. 32
Let. 36
M N. 466

rugulosus
sericeo-hirsutus
spadiceus
splendens M. N
subgiganteus
subsericeus
supinus
tener
tenuissimus
trachodes
umbilicatus
Virginii-Cuboni
Polystictus
argyraceus
barbatulus
connatus
dolosus
Memmingeri
parvulus
villosus
virgineus
Poria
frustulata
f ugax
laurens
megalopora
Racodioides
radula
scalaris
undata
unita
Schizophyllum
alneum
Spathularia
inflata

...Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 28
Let. 37
Pol. 7, Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 38
...M. N. Pol. 7
. Note 9, Let. 32
..M. N. Pol. 33
Let. 36
Let. 36
Let. 37
..M. N. Old. 12

...M. N. 468
..M. N. Pol. 28
M. N. Pol. 7, 10
.....M. N. 468
..M. N. Pol. 12
M. N. Pol. 7, 10
..M. N. Pol. 33
..M. N. Pol. 43

. .M. N. 472
M. N. 472

M. N. 472
M. N. 472
M. N. 472

M. N. 472
M. N. 472
M. N. 472
M. N. 472

...M. N. Old. 4
M N Olrl 4

argentatus
atypus

auriculaeformis
Beatiei
botryoides
cervino-gilvus
cinerascens
citrinus
conglobatus

. . .Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 38
..M. N. Pol. 44
Let. 37
Let. 36
M. N. 466
..M. N. Pol. 44
Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 45
Let. 36
..M. N. Pol. 26
..M. N. Pol. 29
.Note, 2 Let. 29
M. N. 443
Let. 37
Let. 37
..M. N. Pol. 33
..M. N. Pol. 36
Let. 36
. Note 9, Let. 32
. Note 4, Let. 29
M N 467

cupulaeformis
dilatatus
evolvens
flavo-squamosus. . . .
flavovirens
fulvus

f usco-albus
gibberulosus
Glaziovii
Hasseltii
hemileucus
hypococcinus
Juglandis

Korthalsii.

Let 36

laccatus
lacerus
lactifluus
leptopilus
levis
microcyclus
microscopicus

M. N. 467
Let. 37
..M. N. Pol. 38
Let. 36
M. N. 467
. . , Let. 36
Let 37

Sphaeria

pocula M. N. Pol. 45
Trametes
acuta Let. 36
arcticus Note 8, Let. 32
indecorus Let. 37
odoratus var. coratophora. .M. N. 470
trabea Note 1, Let. 29
vittata Let. 36
Tremella
reticulata M N Old. 11

Mons veneris
murinus
niveus
notopus
obvolutus. . .
Pala.

Let. 37
Let. 36
Let. 37
Let. 36
. ..M. N. Pol. 26
Let. 36
M N 492

phaeoxanthus

Pilotae
platypilus
plebius var. cubensis
plicatus

. Note 4, Let. 29
Let. 36
Note 23, Let. 38
Let. 36

Trogia

faginea

...M. N. Old. 2

ADVERTISEMENTS.

We have not included any advertising in this index, but those
interested in the advertising feature will find names of the "authori-
ties" indexed in the separate pamphlets.

16

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. LLOYD.

No. 32.
CINCINNATI, O. FEBRUARY, 1909.

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 0 1942

ELIAS MAGNUS FRIES

Those who have read after me have perhaps good reason to think
that I am not much of a hero-worshiper. But I bow very humbly
at the shrine of Elias Fries. We all admire men who accomplish
their objects in the world, men who do good and practical work, and
Elias Fries, in my opinion, did more effective work in mycology than
all others combined, since the days of Persoon. The chief point of
excellence in Fries' work was that it was systematic. First he learned
his subject thoroughly, then he wrote practical books that enabled
others to learn it. I am not informed as to other branches of natural
history, but I question if any other branch has as complete, as thor-
ough, as accurate a hand-book as the mycologists have in Fries' Hy-
menomycetes Europaei.1

When Fries began his work, Persoon had almost finished his, and
the work of Persoon was the foundation on which Fries built. All
during his life Fries was the undisputed authority in mycology, and
he molded mycological opinion throughout the world. His system
of classification, which is a slight modification of Persoon's, has lasted
down to our day, and is in general use now. More than one system
has been proposed for the purpose of displacing Fries, but with little
success, and it is a question if an}- is, on the whole, superior to that
of Fries. I do not claim that Fries' is final, that it is not possible to
modify to advantage some of his genera, but I think that Fries' sys-
tem in the main will not be displaced in our generation. The specific
descriptions of Fries are models of accuracy and conciseness, and
have been extensively copied and translated. Fries seems to have
had the happy faculty of selecting just the right words to characterize
his species.

THE LIFE OF FRIES

When I was in Sweden I made inquiries as to the events in the
life of Fries, and while I shall not go into minute details, I will sum-
marize some of the leading points.

Fries was born on the i5th day of August, 1794. His father was
a dean of the established church of Sweden in a little, remote coun-
try district, called Femsjo, and it was there that Elias Fries was born.
The elder Fries was a man of liberal education, well fitted to fill a
more important post than a remote country parish, but he was
assigned there when a young man, there he married and there he
passed his life. Elias Fries tells us in one of his books that it was
habitual with his father to speak in the Latin language with him,
and the thorough familiarity of Elias Fries with Latin was due no
doubt to his early training. The elder Fries also instructed his son

» When in a recent article I referred to mycological literature as largely composed of
errors, inaccuracies and mistakes, I most assuredly did not refer to Fries' Hymenomvcetes
Europaei. But the word "accurate," even as referring to Fries' book, is used only relatively
as compared to most of the mycological " literature."

414

ELIAS FRIES

I At the age of 46 years)

(he was an only child) in botany, and it was from finding a speci-
men of Hydnum coralloides, while pursuing natural history studies
with his father, that young Fries was first attracted to the study of
fungi. As a young man he attended the university at Lund where
he took his degree in his twentieth year, Soon after graduation he
obtained a minor position with his Alma Mater, that of Decent (1814),
then Adjunct, (1819), and in 1828 he was appointed Demonstrator of
Botany at the University at Lund. In the meantime he became very
much devoted to the study of mycology and a voluminous writer on
the subject. When only twenty-seven years of age he began the
Systema Mycologicum, a work of three volumes, which was finished
in 1832, and was a complete account of all the fungi known in those
days. Like all young men, Fries was at first ambitious to cover the
whole fungus world, but like every one else, as the years rolled by, he
contracted his field of study and his next extensive work, Epicrisis
Systematis Mycologici, 1836-1838, was devoted exclusively to the
Hymenomycetes. In 1834 he was appointed Professor of Practical
Economics in the University at Upsala, which was then a section of
Philosophy. Wahlenberg was at that time the head of the Depart-
ment of Botany at Upsala.

Owing to the prevalence of cholera in Sweden in 1834, which
interrupted means of travel, Fries was unable to reach Upsala until
April, 1835. He resided there the remainder of his life, except a
temporary residence at Stockholm, during the sessions of the Swedish
Parliament (" Riksdag ") of which he was for two sessions (1844-5 an<^
1847-8) a member. Fries succeeded Wahlenberg, and in 1851 was
appointed Professor of Botany and Director of the Botanical Museum
and of the Botanical Garden, which post he held until his retirement
in his sixty-fifth year. During the last thirty years of his life Fries'
studies were devoted more exclusively to the Hymenomycetes of
Sweden, and principally to the fleshy agarics. He knew the agarics
of Sweden as no man ever knew them before, or perhaps will ever
learn them again. He was a most persistent and industrious searcher
after fleshy fungi. He took long walks and covered much ground, in
both the frondose and pine woods, and there is no question but that
he met -and knew practically all the fleshy agarics that grow in Swe-
den. But Fries' studies were not only made in the fields but in the
literature, and he hunted up all the old illustrations and descriptions
in order to get names for his plants. And to crown it all he wrote a
complete text-book of the Hymenomycetes of Europe, not only a sys-
tematic account of his own observations, but a synopsis of all other
literature of the subject. This work he finished on his eightieth
birthday, August 15, 1874, the day on which the photograph was
taken that we present on the first page of this pamphlet. Fries'
Hymenomycetes of Europe remains to this day the only book cover-
ing the entire fungus field of Europe.2

2 The Claris Hymenomycetum, by Cooke and Quelet, 1878, is a very convenient, condensed
synopsis of Fries' book, and Enchiridion Fungornm, by Quelet, 1886, was a second edition of it
(largely with the names juggled).

4l6

FRIES' HERBARIUM

It is an inaccuracy to speak of Fries' herbarium. He made no
herbarium. Such plants as are found in his collection appear to me

THE BOTANICAL MUSEUM AT UPSALA.

to be more the result of accident than design. Fries was not a museum-
botanist; his studies were made in the fields and woods, and there
the plants grew and grow that he described. In the woods of Sweden
only are to be found the "types" of Fries. Practically all the plants
to be found in Fries' herbarium, of his own collection (and they are
very few) were left from his early days at Femsjo. After he went to

4'7

Upsala, during the latter forty years of his life, he hardly preserved a
single plant. There were quite a number that were collected by his
boys at Upsala, chiefly by E. P. Fries, that presumably were passed on
by his father, but even as to this we have no certain knowledge. His
herbarium is mostly made up of plants that were sent him by his
correspondents, by Blytt from Norway, Karsten from Finland, Quelet
from France, Kalchbrenner from Hungary, and others. While many
of them are Friesian species, there is no evidence that Fries gave
them any critical attention, and they have no authentic value except-
ing in those cases where particular specimens are mentioned in Fries'
writings. Like most of the museums of Europe, Fries' herbarium is
richer in foreign species than in European. One or two of Berkeley's
Ohio plants and some of Schweinitz's species exist only in Fries'
herbarium, as far as I know.

FRIES' FAMILY

Elias Fries was the father of eight children, four daughters and
four sons. The mycological world is only interested in the latter.

Theodore M. Fries, the eldest, is now a hale and hearty elderly
man in his seventy-sixth year. He resides at Upsala. Of the four
sons of Elias Fries, his eldest is the only one who has devoted his life
to botanical studies, and he was a successor of his father in the botan-
ical chair of the university at Upsala. Unfortunately, from a myco-
logical view, he early became interested in lichens, and has chiefly
devoted himself to this family. He has written many papers on the
subject, and occuphs the same exalted position in the lichen world
that his father did in the fungus world. In explanation as to why he
did not follow in the same field as his father, he tells me that when
he began his studies, the microscope was just beginning to be used
in the classification of lichens, and he became so interested in the
problems that his whole time was taken in the investigation of the
questions involved. It is undoubtedly a selfish view to take of it,
but as a mycologist I can not but feel sorry that Theodore M. Fries
was not early interested in mycology instead of lichenology.

Elias P. Fries, the second son of Elias M. Fries, early gave signs
of interest in his father's subject, and there are more specimens to-day
in the Friesian herbarium, collected by E. P. Fries at Upsala, than by
the remainder of the family. He was evidently an enthusiastic stu-
dent of the subject, and you will find in Fries' " Monographia " the
account of many rare species discovered by his son, E. P. Fries. He
died in his twenty-fourth year, and his early death was a severe blow
to the hopes of his father. There is every indication that it was
the intention of Elias Fries, as his eldest son had taken up the lichens,
that his second son should follow in his own chosen field.

J. Otto Fries, the third son, is the only one who did not inherit
a taste for natural history study. He is now a citizen of the United
States, a civil engineer, residing at Orlando, Florida.

Oscar Robert Fries, the youngest son, was a student of fungi, and
as a boy was a frequent companion of his father in his rambles in the

4.8

*

* 1

THEODOR MAGNUS FRIES OSCAR ROBERT FRIES

KLAS ROBERT ELIAS FRIES

woods. The first season I spent in Sweden I learned a number of
determinations of agarics that were on the authority of Elias Fries,
through his son, Robert. He was always interested in mycology, but
was a practicing physician with a large practice, and found little time
to devote to the study of science. He was a frequent correspondent
of Mr. Romell at Stockholm, to-day the leading mycologist of Sweden.
For many years he was located at Goteborg, and published a list of
Hymenomycetes of that region. He died very recently (June, 1908).

There are several grandsons of Elias Fries, young men who are
interested in botany, and who we hope will finally direct their atten-
tion to mycology, and preserve the prestige of the illustrious family
name. We are only acquainted with one of them.

Robert E. Fries is a specialist in the phaenogamic botany of South
America, and has made extensive collections there in the field. At
present he is decent of botany and also assistant at the Botanical
Garden at Upsala. He has also made an exhaustive study of
the Myxomycetes, and has written papers on the Myxomycetes
of South America and Sweden. He is the son of Theodor M.
Fries. His study of the Myxomycetes began under the late Arthur
Lister at London, the acknowledged master of this interesting family.
I know very little of this subject myself, but I suspect Robert E.
Fries has as good a knowledge of the Myxomycetes as any man in
Europe to-day. He is a young man with a promising future before
him, and we look for great work from him.

We will close with a botanical family tree of Elias Magnus Fries.

ELIAS MAGNUS FRIES (=/->.)

professor *i?94

THEODOR MAGNUS FRIES (=7)4. Fr.')

professor *i832 (lichenology)

ELIAS PETRUS FRIES (=E. Fr.jr.}

doctor philos. ®i834 11858 (niykology)

OSCAR ROBERT FRIES (=A*. Fr.}

doctor medic. *iS4o 11908 (niykology)

Sons of ELIAS M. FRIES.

KLAS ROBERT ELIAS FRIES (=/?. E. Fr.} 1

botanices docens '1876 (Flora of South America)

THORE CHRISTIAN ELIAS FRIES (=TA. Fr.jr.} |

student *i886 (lichenology)

ELIAS ARNE FRIES ) 0

student »i887 (mykologv) j S°n °f °SCAR R' FRIES'

420

OUR PHOTOGRAPHS

The photograph on our first page is the familiar picture of Elias
Fries, taken on his eightieth birthday, the day he finished the Hyrae-
nomycetes Europaei. The second picture is a less familiar one, of
Elias Fries at the age of forty-six. It was recently published in Acta
Horti Bergiani, Bd. Ill, and is taken from an oil painting.

Our photographs of Theodor M. Fries, Oscar Robert Fries, and
Robert E. Fries need no explanation.

The photograph on page 417 is of particular interest to me,
as is everything in connection with the life of Elias Fries. The
Botanical Museum at Upsala is a large, rectangular building with an
inner court. During Fries' life the Director of the Museum lived in
the upper story of the building, and the photograph shows the door
of the inner court, giving access to his living rooms. Through this
door Fries passed daily during his residence there from 1851 to 1862.

Elias Magnus Fries died on the eighth day of February, 1878. He
is buried in a cemetery adjoining the University of Upsala, and our
photograph is that of the slab of granite marking his final resting
place.

421

THE AMERICAN SPECIMENS IN THE HER-
BARIUM OF FRIES.

In the herbarium of Elias Fries at Upsala there are a number of
historical specimens from America, some of them I believe not to be
found elsewhere.

SCHWEINITZ'S SPECIMENS.— It is quite evident from both the writings
of Fries and Schweinitz, that the latter sent Fries quite a complete set of his
species from America. They are commented upon in Flies' Elenchus, and in-
cluded in his Kpicrisis. I hoped to find them at Upsala, but I believe that not
one of these original specimens has been preserved. This is unfortunate, for
some of them are missing (or very poor) in the Schweinitz herbarium at Phila-
delphia, and I had hoped to learn more concerning them at Upsala.

There are a few of Schweinitz's species with names pasted on that were
evidently cut from a list which I supposed at first were in Schweinitz's writing.
They are indorsed, however, in the handwriting of Theodor Fries "Schwaegri-
chen Misit,'1 which I at first thought was an error. I took the matter up with
Professor Fries and he looked up his father's correspondence and convinced me
that these specimens did come from Schwaegricheu, who was a German professor
at the University of Bonn. The names on the specimens appear to be in the
same writing as a letter from Schwaegrichen, who wrote that he sent a pack-
age of specimens from America, but does not mention that they are from Schweinitz.
They are all Schweinitzian species, however, and are undoubtedly authentic, but
I believe are probably a division of specimens sent by Schweinitz to Schwaegri-
chen. I hope some day to look up the herbarium of Schwaegrichen if it exists,
and may learn more from it concerning the species of Schweinitz. The follow-
ing are all the undoubtedly authentic specimens fiom Schweinitz to be found
at Upsala. The notes concerning them are my own views.

Merulius brassicaefolius, the same I think as papyraceus of Europe —
Merulius confluens, for me it is Merulius Corium — Merulius incarnatus, nice
specimen of well known plant of America, never collected in Europe. It is the
same as Peck discovered was a " new species " and called Merulius rubellus.

Polyporus cervinus. This is of much interest, being the only good specimen
that exists I think.3 Recently Bresadola has published that cervinus is the
same as biformis, and he takes it as the name for biformis notwithstanding that
there is no question that biformis is the name used for the plant by Fries,
Berkeley, and all American authors.4 I feel well acquainted with biformis as I
have collected it many times, have seen specimens in the museums and have re-
ceived it often from my correspondents, and I should never have referred the
Schweinitzian specimen of cervinus at Upsala to biformis. I do not know it
and it is surely a rare plant in the United States. I can not say that it should not
be referred as an unusual, abnormal form of biformis, but I do not believe even
that.

Polyporus scutellatus, from Curtis "ex. herb Schweinitz." It is a well known
species — Polyporus spissus. The best specimen I have seen of this Poria. It is
a peculiar American species with a number of aliases, discovered to be a " new
species " on various occasions, often described, but never correctly but once and
that was by Peck.— Polyporus superficialis, surely the same as Poria viticola as
stated by Fries, if not a species of Europe.— Polyporus Tulipiferns, too poor for
comments. — Polyporus viticola, good specimens.

3As I write this article at Paris from my notes made at Upsala I do not have with me my not<
made in the herbarium of Schweinitz nor of Berkeley, and must trust to my memory, which 1 think
clear as to these points: that Polyporus cervinus is not found at Kew, and only very poor specimei
from which nothing can be told at Philadelphia. The specimen at Upsala is in perfect condition.

<Asa matter of truth the original meanings of biformis and pergamenus have been transposed sine
Klotzsch published them. It is a long story and I shall not dwell on it now, for it is of no interest e:
cept from an historical standpoint or perhaps to the name-jugglers). The names biformis and pergameiu
and the plants that bear them are too well established to ever be changed.

422

Porothelium lacerutn, a little fragment labeled originally Boletus Pezizoides.
As far as I have been able to learn thus far there is but one species of Poro-
thelium in Europe or America which I would call fimbriatutn.

BERKELEY'S SPECIES.— There are a number of American species of
Berkeley's naming in the herbarium of Fries, received mostly from Berkeley,
Curtis and Lenormand. At first I was very much puzzled to find many Ameri-
can plants with a French label, a handwriting unfamiliar to me, mostly speci-
mens from " Caroline-de-Sud " and indorsed in Th. Fries' writing " Lenormand
misit." I had never heard of any such American collector as " Lenormand." Th.
Fries tells me that Lenormand resided at Vire, in Normandy, France, when he
(Th. Fries) on one occasion visited him.5 He was not a mycologist but an algol-
ogist, and never collected in America. These specimens, though the labels were
written by Lenormand, undoubtedly came from Curtis, and I think must have
been received by Fries after the publication of Novae Symbolae.

Berkeley's own sendingsto Fries from America were mostly from Lea, Ohio,
and were of special interest to me as the original specimens collected in my own
neighborhood. There is a better representation of Lea's Ohio Plants at Upsala
than at Kew, and one specimen at least that is not at Kew.

Curtis sent Fries many specimens, mostly though those that have been
named by Berkeley. In addition there are a few specimens from Sprague and
some from Farlow.

As practically all of Berkeley's American species are known and mostly well
represented at Kew and in the Curtis' herbarium at Cambridge, Mass., I will
onU note here those I found at Upsala that were novelties to me.

Polyporus dryophilus — I was indeed glad to find a good type specimen at
Upsala. There is none at Kew or Paris, and I believe this is the only one in ex-
istence. It came originally from Lea. Morgan has attempted to fit plants to
Berkeley's determination of Lea's specimens, collected at Cincinnati. Morgan
referred a collection to Polyporus dryophilus and this collection is the one on
which, in America, we have based our opinions of this species. As I recall
Morgan's plant, it is not the same as the type at Upsala. It is needless to say
that Fries' (Novae Symbolae) reference of this plant " Raven el, Mexico," is an
error. It should be "Lea, Ohio."

Polyporus Sartwellii. — I do not remember seeing this before. It appears to
me to be close to a rit

Daedalea pallido-fulva. — I have seen this plant before at Kew. I can not
agree with its reference to synonymy as originally referred by Bresadola (and
copied by Murrill). It was correctly interpreted by Morgan, I think. I am ac-
quainted with the plant in its type locality, and it is a good species, though
Berkeley has another name for it.

Polyporus galactinus. — There is a better specimen at Upsala than at Kew,
but I have often collected the fresh plant at Cincinnati. Dried specimens of the
plant are always poor. Its relations are entirely with the Anodermei Carnosi of
Fries, not with the Hispidi as stated by Fries, nor with Spongiosi, as placed by
Murrill.

AMERICAN SPECIES NAMED BY FRIES.— These are very few indeed.
Most of the American plants that reached Fries had been previously named by
Berkeley. The following are all that are given in Novae Symbolae.

Polyporus spectabilis. — There is a good specimen at Upsala. I agree with
Cooke. To me it is a mesopodal Polyporus Schweinitzii.

Polvporus poripes. — There is no specimen at Upsala. I had expected to find
one, as Mr. Murrill visited Upsala and then came home and announced that
flavovirens was a synonym for poripes. I think he got his idea from Raveuel's
exsiccata, hardly a just way of arriving at Fries species, particularly as Fries
describes poripes as having white pores, and every one knows that the pores of
flavovirens are yellow. If I wished to guess at the identity of poripes, as Mr.
Murrill evidently has done, I should guess the same plant that Underwood de-
scribed to be a ''new species," (Polyporus retipes).

5 I am told by Monsieur Hariot that the herbarium of Lenormand is now at the Faculte des Sci-
:es de Caen, France.

423

Polyporus scruposus.— I did not find the type, but I believe, as generally
held, that scruposus is a (marked) form of gilvus.

Polyporus Berkeleyi.— I found no type, but there is no question as to the
species. The co-type (under the name of Polyporus Anax) is found in Berkeley's
herbarium.

Polyporus Ravenelii. — I found no type.

Polyporus barbatulus. — I find no type, but a specimen from Lenormand
labeled " Polyporus barbatulus Fr. (non-Hexagona sericea) ad Juniper, Caroline-
de-Sud." It is our well known plant on cedar in the southern states. I think
it is " Hexagona sericea," and I do not know (except habitat) the difference be-
tween it and the common Polystictus pinsitus of the tropics.

Trametes lactea.— I did not find the type, but I think it is well known
under many forms and many names.

Trametes zebrina. — No type found.

PHALLOIDS IN THE MUSEUM AT UPSALA.

In alcohol. — There is a very abundant collection made by E. Nyman in Java
a number of years ago, but mostly unlabeled. The phalloids of Java are well
known now, due to the work of Penzig and Dr. Bernard. The following species
are at Upsala :

Phallus indusiatus, twelve collections, ten of the usual form with broad
pilei and two with slender pilei.

Phallus irpicoides (or Phallus merulinus, a better name for it), two collec-
tions. This is a frequent species in Java.

Simblum periphragmoides, five collections. I have heretofore held that the
species so frequent in the East Indies which was called Simblum gracile was
distinct in its much more slender form than the original specimen of Simblum
periphragmoides from Mauritius. These specimens at Upsala, however, are

some of them obese, and so evidently the same as the original specimen at Kew
that I will have to recede from my former view, and as Professor Fischer does,
consider them one species.

Mutinus bambusinus, one collection.

Clathrus Treubei, three collections, two old, with the arms broken apart, as
shown in Myc. Notes, p. 382, fig. 212.

Jansia rugosa, one collection.

There is also at Upsala in alcohol, a specimen of Aseroe rubra from New
Zealand, collected by G. von Scheele; Clathrus cancellatus from Montpellier,
France, and ten collections of Phallus impudicus by various collectors in
Sweden.

Dried specimens. — Aseroe rubra from New Zealand, Berggren, and a draw-
ing from the fresh specimens; Clathrus cancellatus, Tirol, Bresadola ; Clathrus
pusillus, " New Holland, ex. Berk.;" Mutinus elegans from Curtis, and labeled
" Corynites brevis ; which was a manuscript name for it ; Clathrus cibarius,
New Zealand, Berggren ; Lysurus Gardneri, co-types, ex. Berkeley ; Macowan-
ites agaricinus, co-type from Kalchbrenner. (Not usually classed' in the phal-
loids, but to my mind closely related); Mutinus caninus, ex. Quelet, France ;
Mutinus (unnamed) Guadeloupe, L/Herminier. (Something curious but un-
named, and I think this specimen unnamable); Phallus impudicus Fautrey,
France; Clathrus guttatus, no specimen but the type drawing from Orsted on
which the species was based.

A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION.— Monsieur Patouillard a public depuis
longtemps et il me 1'a d'ailleurs encore confirme personnellement 1'annee der-
niers que le Polyporus lucidus a des spores verruqueuses. Atkinson pretend
qu'il est victim d'une erreur d'optique et que les spores de ce champignon sont
lisses. Je pense que Monsieur Patouillard sera heureux d'apprendre ce qu'At-
kinson pense de sou opinion sur ce point d' observation microscopique.

424

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BV O. G. LLOYD.

No. 33.
CINCINNATI, O. AUGUST, 1909.

PAUL HENNINGS.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES
IAN 9 ft 1Q/I9

NOTES OF TRAVEL. BERLIN.

Since my previous visit to Berlin there has been quite a change in
the botanical surroundings. The collection is now installed in the
new botanical museum, which is the largest and finest in the world.
While I like the plan at Kew better, there is no denying the fact that
from an architectural point of view the Germans have a much better
and more expensive building. It is divided into a number of separate
rooms and each member of the force has his own private room in
which to work. I do not know how many rooms there are, but some
idea may be obtained from the fact that the room in which I worked
was Number 207. While the present working force at Berlin is
unquestionably the largest of any institution, they have evidently
provided for all possible future growth.

From a mycological point of view the museum at Berlin is not as
important as others in Europe, for it is relatively a recent collection,
principally the work of the late Dr. Hennings. Of historical collections
they have the plants of Klotzsch and Winters1, and also many of Link's
specimens. Also I found there some of the collections of Beyrich
from Brazil on which Fries based a number of early species, and the
Brazilian phalloids of Alfred Moeller, in alcohol.

At the present writing there has been no successor appointed to
the position held by Dr. Hennings, who died last October, nor do I
know where they will find in Germany a good man to take his place.
While the Germans have forged to the front in Phsenogamic botany,
and to-day lead the world in this department, systematic mycology in
Germany, as it is in the most of Europe, except France, is in a very
languishing condition.

PAUL HENNINGS.

The photograph that we present on our first page, of the late Dr.
Paul Hennings, was taken during the later years of his life and well
presents him as I knew him.

He was born in 1841, and died October 14, 1908. It was only in
comparatively recent years that Dr. Hennings became prominent in
the mycological world, for he took up the subject late in life (when
he was forty-six years old) and published his introductory paper after
he was fifty years of age. Previously he had been interested in botany
in general, and museum work in particular, and was engaged in ar-
ranging the museum at Kiel when he made the acquaintance of Pro-
fessor Eichler, and this acquaintance led to his studies in mycology.
Shortly after Eichler came to Berlin (in 1878) as Director of the
Botanical Gardens and Museums, he appointed Dr. Hennings as as-
sistant in the gardens and museum. I judge that Dr. Hennings be-
came a mycologist through force of circumstances. At about that
time the Germans were beginning to take the lead in botanical mat-

lln Winters' herbarium are lound many of Kalchbrenner's minings or i
namings, to be accurate;.

426

ters, and collections of plants began to arrive from all the German
colonies of the world. Naturally a great many fungi were sent in and
there was no one to work them up. Dr. Hennings, with very little
preliminary study in this line, undertook the work. He had no in-
structor and a very scanty herbarium of named specimens, but with
that persistent application that is characteristic of the, German
student, he devoted himself to the work until he finally got a good
grasp of it.

It was a fortunate thing that Dr. Hennings was wise in the earlier
days of his fungus work in sending the specimens in the herbarium
to Bresadola and having them gone over critically and the names cor-
rected. The original collection was largely that of Winters, and
Winters' collection was largely named by Kalchbrenner, and Kalch-
brenner's determinations were almost all wrong. Had Dr. Hennings
attempted to learn mycology on the basis of Kalchbrenner's deter-
minations he would have made disastrous work of it. I do not be-
lieve they appreciate, even at Berlin, how much they are indebted to
Bresadola for the correctness of most of Dr. Hennings' determinations.

Dr. Hennings took the collection of fungi at Berlin when it con-
sisted of only a relatively few specimens of Winters, Link and
Klotzsch, and he increased it many fold until now I think, it is per-
haps the third or fourth largest collection in Europe. He arranged
and labeled the many specimens that reached Berlin from foreign
countries, and in addition he was an industrious collector of the fungi
around Berlin. In no other museum of Europe have I found as good
and as recent collections of the local fungi as that made by Dr. Hen-
nings. And he deserves great credit for it, for the collection was
made under very discouraging circumstances. I should as soon think
of hunting for mushrooms on Broadway as fungi in the woods around
Berlin. The Germans are much too thrifty a people to suit me as a
mycologist. They keep their woods too clean, and the poor fungi
have a hard time trying to find a little dead wood lying about on
which to grow.

Dr. Hennings' work was largely the publication of " new species,"
for it is in this manner that museums are built up. A large number
of " good things " came into his hands, for they were largely from un-
explored regions (Africa, New Guinea, etc.) and the mycology of such
portions of the world is as yet practically untouched. In proportion
to its size I think the museum at Berlin has as many novelties as any
museum in which I have worked.

But it was not in the herbarium proper that Dr. Hennings did his
best work. He was by nature and training a mnsemx mail, -.and in the
"show department" of the botanical museum at Berlin is the largest
and finest exhibition of fungi for popular instruction that I have ever
seen, and D'r: Hennings made and arranged it.

Personally Dr: Hennings was a most charming man, and students
visiting his collection were always welcomed and given every atten-
tion and facility for work. He was very kind to me on my first visit
to Berlin, and I missed him greatly during my recent stay.

427

OUR LAW MAKERS.

As long as there are botanical institutions with "axes to grind,"
and as long as there are men who like to pose as authorities and make
"laws" or "rules," as they call them, for others, so long will we have
our Botanical "law makers." ' However, they have about the same
power to enforce these laws as have stage policemen, and the whole
subject is very much on the order of opera bouffe.

The botanical "law maker" is a very familiar, but at present a
somewhat discredited type in America. We have in America (unfor-
tunately) two factions or rival cliques of botanists that love each other
as do the French and Germans. One faction has been very busy
for the past eight or ten years making their "laws" and scolding every-
body who did not approve of them. They have been exceedingly
and perniciously active. After they had carried matters with a higji
hand in America for a number of years, they thought they would
work the same plan on a more extended scale. So they went in full
force to Vienna. But the Germans had their own "axes to grind,"
and when they had finished our American law makers were the worst
defeated crowd that ever got beaten at their own game. They did
have strength enough left to whip up a few stragglers at Philadelphia
and "secede," but I think they are heartily sick of the law-making
business. It is to be hoped, and to a degree expected, that now
American botany will have a little much needed rest on that subject
from this quarter.

But the other faction is now trying the same plan and methods
and has appointed an agent as their chief steerer and wire puller.
He probably is of the opinion that he is directing things, but botanical
laws are always cut and dried affairs and the men with axes rarely
show their hands. Some one is necessarily singled .out to turn the
grindstone, but it is to be observed that the other two American
members decline to be used for that purpose.

Our trouble in America is purely an American quarrel, and, like
the Kilkenny cats, we should be left to fight it out among ourselves,
without involving the Europeans.

But that is not the plan. In order to make it appear that there
is an international demand for "laws" for nomenclature of crypto-
grams, a few prominent men in European mycology, such as Bresadola,
Patouillard, and Massee, have been appointed as a committee to formu-
late these "laws." These men are mycologists. They are interested
in their own work and are too much engaged to waste their time
making "laws" either to regulate nomenclature or to regulate the
wind, one of which is just as practicable as the other. The use of
their names, in one instance at least, and I suspect in all, was un-
authorized, and jafit:.<^ne of the three, I am told, will have anything to

428

<lo with it. While I am not authoritatively informed as to. any
of the others, I doubt if there is any mycologist of standing in
Europe -or America either who really thinks that anything but a row
is ever accomplished by "laws" in Botany. The last circular (No. 5)
that was issued by the agitation committee whose object is to make
"laws," complained of a general apathy on the subject. The entire
circular is a pitiful appeal for somebody to take an interest in it.
Botanists in general are weary of the never ending and useless "law-
making," and at the present writing the prospects are that the next
"International Law Congress" will be an international fizzle. As a
Frenchman 'would say, "Tant mieux."

A SUGGESTION. — Why would it not be a good idea to put the "name
of the namer" after geographical names as well as botanical names. Some
ambiguity might be avoided by it. Thus, Saccardo would not have referred
Fomes superpositus to "New England, Amer. bor." if there had been added
to the Australian New England the name of some pioneer Australian explorer.
Nor the South African Broomeia congregata to "Albany, Amer. Bor." if the
South African Albany had attached to it the name of some celebrated lion
hunter.

STEREUM VERSICOLOR.— We all know the plant called, in American
mycology, Stereum versicolor. It was so called by Berkeley and also by Ellis.
Professor Burt told me he had not found the type which was collected by
Swartz in Jamaica and published in 1788. He calls the plant Stereum fasciatum,
Schweinitz. The type of Stereum versicolor is at the British Museum, but
is not our American plant. It has a smooth, striated pileus, not tomentose
as our plant. I think we shall have to call our plant Stereum fasciatum. It
probably has a European nanie, however, as it grows in Northern Europe.

PROFESSOR HARD'S BOOK.

I presume the mycologists of the United States are now mostly
familiar with Professor M. E. Hard's book, "Mushrooms, edible and
otherwise." It was probably issued last year, but as I (in Europe) am
not in touch with matters mycological in America, I only learned a
few weeks ago that the book was out, and sent for a copy. I can not
say that I was surprised when I received it to find that \ve at last
have a good, popular work on common fungi, as I had seen the manu-
script and knew it was going to be a good book if the printers did their
part. I think they have done very well.

The important feature of Professor Hard's book is that it is prac-
tical. The beginner, the student, can take the book and go into the
fields and woods and identify a large part of the fungi he finds. It
will be a constant source of inspiration to the woods lover to have a
book in which he can look up the pictures and get some idea of the
curious growths he meets on every hand. Twelve or fifteen years
ago when I began work on the subject there was nothing of the kind
in America. All that we had were Peck's Reports, of very little serv-

429

ice as they were largely devoted to "new species," and Morgan's
papers, of which the Agaric portion at least was made up by adapting
Fries' descriptions to Berkeley's determinations of dried specimens.
It was then a matter of the greatest difficulty to get names for our
commonest plants. With the help of Hard's book any one ought to
work out the usual fungi that he meets. I believe that the book will
do more to popularize mycology in America than any work that was
ever issued. It would hardly be fair to contrast Hard's book with
those that have gone before, as he has had the advantage of the work
done by others, and has gotten many things right that he would
have gotten wrong a few years ago. Professor Hard was also wise
to delay publishing his work until he had met and learned the
most of the common plants. Atkinson's book, a few years ago,
which was the first step in the right direction, was an immature
production. The author had not learned a great deal of his subject
when he went into print and the result was a fragmentary account,
good as far as it went, but it did not go very far. Hard's book will
supply much of this deficiency.

As to the question of the accuracy of the names employed, while
there is much yet to be learned of the history of American plants,
Hard's book well represents the present knowledge. It will be many
years before the ultimate truth as to many American plants is worked
out. We are particularly glad to note that Professor Hard has not
resorted to any cheap process of name juggling, but has used the names
in common use.

This book is a practical demonstration of the value of photography
in mycology, a fact, however, that was clearly demonstrated by Atkin-
son's book. It is an evidence of the practical side of the American
character that we have adopted an easy and practical way of illustrat-
ing our fungi, while the old world lags behind. There is not in
Europe to-day a single, popular book on mycology as well and as
clearly illustrated as Hard's book. As our American plants are nearly
all the same as those of Europe, to any one in Europe studying fungi
this book will be found of more service than any one popular book
they now have.

The Gastromycetes of Hard's book are up to date, accurately and
correctly named.1 It is the first connected and well illustrated account
that we have of our American puff balls. All the common species are
well represented, and in future there will be no reason why any one

'The few errors thatoccur are mostly in the advertise ments. Thus " Roth " for Rostkovius;
I.ycoperdon acuminptum " Bosc ;" Lycoperdon pusillum " Kr." As Professor Hard inserts ad-
" lie fetis"

vertisements in accordance with the fetish custom in order to make the book look " scientific,"
and has copied them from other books without knowing- anything about their meaning, he
naturally gets more or less of them incorrect. As the custom is both senseless and useless
when it is employed in this way (and it is the usual way that it is employed) it does not matter
much whether they are right or wrong. As long as he goes through the'form of writing some
personal name after his plant names to make a show of learning, it is immaterial whether he
writes after Lycoperdon cruciatum "Koth" or "Ross" or " Rostafinska " or " Roussel " or
"Rostkovius." They all have the same meaning for Mr. Hard and the most of his readers.
Some of the mistakes he makes in attempting to follow this fetish custom are highly amusing.
Thus, " Moy " I presume was some Chinese writer. Montague who spent his life seeking glory
along the usual " new species" route, might be chagrined to find himself referred to as " Mr.
Montgomery." Such is fame !

430

should have any trouble in determining these plants in America.
One serious mistake only occurs in this section. The photograph
used to illustrate Nidnlaria pisiformis has also (the lower plant) a
photograph of Nidula Candida, which should have been cut off as it
has no resemblance to Nidularia pisiformis. We might go through
the work and pick out other mistakes, but there is to much that is
good in the work it would be in poor taste to harp on the little that
is bad.

We congratulate professor Hard on his book, and American my-
cology in having such a work. Every man interested in fungi should
have a copy, whether he lives in America or Europe.

HOW SPHAEROBOLUS THROWS ITS
PERIDIOLE.

At the time I wrote my account of Sphaerobolus stellatus I had
never closely observed the fresh plant. There has always been a
tradition that the plant ejects its peridiole with force. There is no

Fig 245 (X6).
Sphaerobolus stellatus at an early stage.

trouble in tracing this tradition back two hundred years to Micheli,
who pictures a plant ejecting its peridiole like a cannon ball from a
mortar. As it is evident that some of our modern pictures have been
made up from Micheli, I suspected that the idea was derived from this
source. I am glad to be able to say, however, that the essentials
are true.

Sphaerobolus stellatus (which, in my opinion, is the only species

that exists with us) is not a common plant. I found it rarely the past
season in Sweden on pine boards, it grows caespitose, the white my-
celium spreading over the rotten wood. The young plant is partly
imbedded and is at first white, and covered with this mycelial layer.
A section at this stage shows the young peridiole in the center (white,
750 mic.), surrounded by two distinct, yellowish peridia, the inner
white (60 mic.), the outer yellow (120 mic.). Both of these peridia
are composed of large, globose cells (parenchymatous tissue)2 and are
imbedded in the white, gelatinous, mycelial layer (composed of fila-
mentous tissue). As the plant develops, it emerges from the mycelial
(gelatinous layer), as shown in Fig. 245, where several young plants
are shown, the lower one fully emerged. At this stage the outer perid-

Sphaerobol

Fig. 246 (X 6 .
stellatus before the ejection of the peridiole.

ium chiefly shows, and as this peridium is yellow, the plant is usually
described as yellow.

The next stage of development (Fig. 246) both peridia open at
the top, exposing the reddish brown peridiole. This opening takes
place gradually. If a section is now made, the peridia are found to
be cup-shaped, the inner white, nesting in the outer yellow. These
two peridia are united at the top and break irregularly, as shown in
our Fig. 246. There are no regular, stellate lobes, as usually shown
in illustrations which are copied from old pictures. At length the
inner peridium suddenly turns out and ejects the peridiole with some
force. It is said to be accompanied by a slight noise. I can not vouch
for that. But the peridiole is thrown from one to five inches, depend-

-I could not note that there was any material difference in the cellular structure of
there peridia as shown in the usual illustration.

432

ing on the vigor of the plant. This sudden inversion of the inner
peridium is evidently a mechanical process. I do not exactly under-
stand it, but think it is due to the thinning of the upper walls of
the inner peridium , and a contraction at the opening. After the, ejec-
tion of the peridiole the inner peridium, which is thin and white, soon
dries up and disappears, hence is not seen on dried specimens.

Fig. 2471X6).

Sphaerobolus stellatus showing two plants that have just ejected
• the peridioles.

We think our photographs of the plant at the various stages
will make the subject plain. They are all magnified six diameters, as
the plant is not much larger than a mustard seed." In our last figure
(247) two plants are shown that have just thrown out the peridioles.

DU RAND'S PAPER ON GEOGLOSSACEAE.

What impresses me as being a most thorough paper on the Geo-
glossums and allied plants of North America appeared in a German
periodical recently. We have all known that Professor Durand has
been at work on the Discomycetes for a number of years, and this
is the first important result of the work. We trust he will publish
the remainder of the field in the same exhaustive manner. Professor
Durand has studied the American specimens of all the principal mu-
seums, both American and European, as well as having done much
field work. We now have a knowledge of what species occur with
us, where they occur, and their relative frequency or rarity, some-
thing that we did not have before. We are only sorry that it is not
in a more accessible form, for there are many collectors in America

433

who observe these curious plants and have no way of studying them.
Professor Durand finds the following species in the United States :
Mitrula 6, Spathularia 2, Leotia 3, Vibrissea 2, Apostemidium 2, Cu-
donia 3, Geoglossum 24. The latter genus he divides into five small
genera. The old genera are divided nowadays by a process of divi-
sion like the multiplication of bacteria. It has the advantage from
a "systematic" point of view that there is no limit to it, nor to the
new combinations that can be made in this manner. Several have
tinkered with the genus Geoglossum: Saccardo, Massee, Boudier,
Durand, and others. The only thing common to their work is the
uniform diversity of the results.

As to specific names, Professor Durand is an earnest follower
after "priority." The German edict has gone forth that species have
to conform to priority, but genera do not. The result is a reversal
of many familiar, specific names, and the installation of others of much
less merit. Sometimes this automatic process produces most gro-
tesque results. For instance, we are commanded to call the common
yellow Geoglossum, which is always yellow, Geoglossum rufum.
"Rufum" is a word from one of the dead languages, meaning reel.
Professor Durand names the Geoglossum "rufum," and then tells us
"it is easily known by the yellow color of every part." He would
probably have more regard for the fitness of things if he were naming
a yellow dog.1

There is one feature of Professor Durand's paper that is an
eloquent testimony to his thorough, complete knowledge of the sub-
ject. After working over hundreds of specimens of Geoglossums he
finds only nine new species. It is usually a safe rule to judge of the
knowledge of a man who works in an old field by an inverse propor-
tion to the relative number of "new species" he finds. The fewer old
ones he knows, the more new ones he always finds.

Professor Durand's work is a credit to American mycology and
will always be the authority on these plants. We wish there were
other groups worked up in the same manner. One such paper as
Durand issues is worth more than the lifetime work of the average
hit-and-miss "new species" exploiter.

FIGURE X6.

We find that a most convenient way to illustrate small objects or
details, such as pores, etc., is to photograph them (enlarged) direct.
We have a lens that makes a magnification of about six diameters.
We have taken many photographs with this enlargement, and many-
figures of this nature will appear in future issues. We shall mark
these figures X6, and think the matter will be understood without
further explanation.

JIn Paris "Black" is a common name for a dog, and it does not make much differ-
ence what his color is. I suppose some Frenchman who knew a little English had a black
dog some time that he called "Black." It seems to be a good name for a dog, at least it
is largely used in Paris. The French may name their dogs in this way if they wish, but I
do not believe it is the correct principle to apply to the naming of plants.

434

REDISCOVERY OF BOVISTELLA
PALUDOSA.

Sixty odd years ago Leveille collected in the Sphagmim moss at
Malesherbes, France, a puff ball (Bovistella paludosa, cfr. Myc. Notes,
p. 280). One specimen is in the museum at Paris, and another of
this same collection at Kew. These two specimens are all there are
in the museums, and it has never reached me from any of my corre-
spondents. It is surely a very rare plant, or at least a rarely collected
plant.

Fig. 248.
Bovistella paludosa

During the past season Mr. Thomas Gibbs collected this rare
species "on the moss on the Cleveland Hills, Yorkshire," England. A
specimen was sent in by Carleton Rea. It proved to be the same as
Leveille's plant. I wras glad to be able to cut it open, for neither of
the type specimens is cut, and we did not know the nature of its
sterile base. It has a compact sterile base of small cells, and is the
only puff ball in Europe with such a sterile base, excepting Lycoper-
don polymorphum. Indeed, when I first saw the plant cut open
I thought it was Lycoperdon polymorphum.

An error has been made in our account of Bovistella paludosa as
to the capillitium. In the cut specimen we readily see that the
capillitia are not all "separate" threads, but many evidently at-
tached. Those in the center of the puff ball appear to be " sepa-
rate," and I think we have here a plant with a type of capillitium
intermediate between that of Lycoperdon (typical) and Bovista
(typical), connecting the two types.

In the Annales Mycologici of last year (Feb., 1908), I noticed a
"new species," described under the name Lycoperdon Bubakii, which
from the description seemed to me to be Bovistella paludosa. I
wrote to Professor Bubak, and he has kindly sent me a specimen,
and it is the same species. Professor Bubak collected it in Montene-
gro, which is the third collection known. Bovistella paludosa is so
similar to Lycoperdon polymorphum that it can only be certainly
known by the microscope, and it is possible that other collections
have been taken for the latter plant.

435

39841,3

A NEW BROOMEIA.

The genus Broomeia has heretofore been known from a single
species, Broomeia congregata, from South Africa. An account was
given of it in Mycological Notes, page 193 and Plate 21. As the initial
work was well done by Berkeley and a goad iEustration published, the
plant is fortunate in escaping all synonyms. Recently another species
has been published by Dr. v. Hohnel of Vienna. It came also from
South Africa. The external appearance of the two plants is the same,
and when Dr. v. Hohnel sent me a photograph of his new species I
was disposed to think it would prove to be a slight form. I wrote
for some gleba, and find that the spores are strongly different, hence

Fig. 249.
Broomeia ellipsospora, natural size. A, spores. B, spores of B. congregata.

I consider it a good species. Broomeia congregata (Fig. B) has
globose, strongly reticulate-echinulate spores. Broomeia ellipsospora
(Fig. A), as Dr. v. Hohnel calls it, has sinootli, elliptical spores. The
figure herewith (kindly made by A. D. Cotton) shows the spores in
contrast. The photograph of the plant was sent by Dr. v. Hohnel.

A NEW GENUS, CYANOSPORUS.

BY N. J. McGiNTY.

The common species" called Polyporus caesius by Fries, was put
in the section Anodermei Carnosi. This section was discovered to be
a new genus by Karsten, and characterized as having white (or
whitish-yellow) spores and other characters (copied from Fries). He
was followed by our distinguished American specialist, Mr. Murrill.
The celebrated French genus-discoverer, Monsieur Quelet, also dis-
covered this same section to be a new genus and named it Leptopo-
rus. But Cyanosporus caesius does not have "white or whitish-
yellow spores." They are blue in mass, and hence can not, by any
process of reasoning adopted by our modern polyporoid experts, be
included in the same genus. In fact, it is the rule now generally
adopted by my co-workers to make the color of the spores the pri-
mary division of the polyporoids, the same as Fries did for the
Agarics. I hence have discovered that Polyporus caesius (Schraeder)
Fries, forms a new genus, Cyanosporus, characterized by having
bluish spores (and other characters as specified by Fries under Ano-
dermei Carnosi), and I have named the plant Cyanosporus caesius
(Schraeder) McGinty.

436

FOMES APPLANATUS AND FOMES LEUCO-
PHAEUS.

It is well known to those who are familiar with the subject that
the European species, Fomes applanatus, presents characters quite
different from those of its American analogue, Fomes leucophaeus.
The European species has a dark brown crust, rather soft; often you
can indent it with your thumb nail and easily cut it with a knife.
The American species has a hard, pale, horny crust, and if you want
to cut it you had better take an ax. Fomes applana'us is a European
plant, not (surely) known in America, though as has been pointed out
several times, our American species was for many years passed off as
being this plant of Europe.

We have in America a very similar plant, Fomes reniformis, a good
species, I think, but a bad name. It has the same soft texture and soft,
brown crust as Fomes applanatus, but is an annual plant (hence, not
a true Fomes) while Fomes applanatus is a perennial plant. If Fomes
applanatus grew in the United States, it would be difficult to dis-
tinguish the first year's growth from Fomes reniformis, unless by the
spores.

Fomes leucophaeus is the most common Fomes in the United
States. It occurs in Europe rarely, but when it does occur it is easily
distinguished from the common European species, and has been so
distinguished by all recent writers — Bresadola, Patouillard, Rolland,
Boudier, etc. As to spores, Patouillard has published that leuco-
phaeus has smooth spores, and applanatus rough spores. That has
always been my understanding, though I have relied on Patouillard's
published statements. Atkinson has recently published that the
spores of F'omes leucophaeus and applanatus are both smooth, and
that they are the same species. I have examined a number of speci-
mens since and think he is right as to the spores, but it does not follow
that the plants are the same species", nor that the spores of all "Gano-
dermas" are smooth. I have observed our American species, reni-
formis, a number of times, and never questioned but that it has rough
spores, and am still of that opinion. Also lucidus, I believe, has
rough spores. Atkinson tells us that the spores are not rough,
that they only look rough under the microscope, and that this is
consequently an optical illusion. That may be true, but if it is an
"optical illusion" it is much more "illusive" in some cases than in
others.

All three of these species are closely related, and many inter-
mediate, connecting forms occur, and all three can be held to be forms
of one species, as Atkinson alone holds, as to two ; or, they can be
considered as three different species, as everybody else now considers
them, including our own Mr. Murrill, at least in the last published
work I have seen from his pen.

437

THE VARIATION OF THE CORTEX AND SPECIES.

There is one factor that is net taken into account by those who see a new
species in every slight difference. That is the factor of variation of the same
plant. I could well present the above photographs and claim that I have two
species very different in their cortex nature. And. yet both these specimens
grew from the same mycelium. They are about the same age, and are brothers
in fact. The species is Lycoperdon umbrinum which Persoon well illustrated,
showing it with a very minute cortex as our plant on the right. Had some
one shown Persoon the plant on the left, it would for him have been another
species. But not only does the cortex of Lycoperdons vary in different indi-
viduals of the same species, but it changes on the same individual with age.
For instance, who would regard our enlargements (Fig. 251) as representing
the same cortex? And yet they represent the same plant, the same cortex
at different ages.

Fig. 250.
Lycoperdon umbriiiutn, showing variation of cortex.

The study of mycology is net a matter of exact measurement. It
is rather a study of variation, a study of change. All things that live
change. Nature, instead of casting her species in molds, each specimen like
the other, seems to delight in producing an infinite variety. The learned pro-
fessor gets a specimen with a little different spores, or cortex, or color, or
form, and looks wise and says that it is a new species. "I will name and
describe it and add my name to it, and be handed down to posterity as a
wonderful discoverer." About three times out of four he will be sorry for
it if he lives long enough to learn better. Luckily for the learned professor,
when it^is found out it is printed in small type and put in synonymy, and the
matter is smoothed over. But in plain English "synonymy" (in the opinion
of the writers) is simply a record of some one's blunders, and there is no
subject on earth where there is more synonymy than in mycology.

Nor is there any finality to it. No one knows what a species is, and each
man's species are only individual opinions. If he knows but few plants his

species are clear to him and he has no trouble or hesitation in discovering new
species. The more specimens he studies, however, the more vague become
his species until at last he is apt to reach the conclusion that there is no such
thing as species. The whole series becomes one confluent, connected mass.
We can illustrate that best by a relief map. We put our finger here and

Fig. 251 XG .
Cortex of lycoperdon pratense at different ages.

say this is a mountain, and here there are foot-hills and here a plain. But
you can not say where the mountain ends and the foot-hills begin. So it is
with species. We pick out certain- prominent characters and say these are the
characters of this species, and other characters of that species, but if they
are "related" and we have enough collections and material, we will find that
our two species run into each other and we can not draw a line between them.
The fewer specimens a man sees the clearer his species are to him.

DUPLICATE NAMES.

The great bugaboo that is always offered as an excuse why authors should
write their names after plant names is — "What are you going to do when
different authors call different plants the same name unless you designate the
author?" These cases are relatively rare.

I have just worked over the names of the phalloids. There are about
a hundred phalloids known (or more or less known) and they have about
three hundred names. In this lot there are only two instances where the same
name is applied to different plants, viz : Mutinus elegans of Java, in the sense
of Fischer, is not the same as Mutinus elegans of the United States. Nor is
this instance very serious, for Mutinus elegans of Java is much better called
Jansia elegans. Phallus roseus of Egypt is not the same as Phallus roseus
of Java. Xor is this instance very serious, for neither species has any value.
On the other hand, there is one case where twenty-four different names refer
to the same plant, each one of the twenty-four bearing the advertisement
of the learned author who proposed it. The advertising system of mycology
is very much a case of straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel.

WANTED -A GOOD COLOR BOOK.

If there is one thing more than another that is needed in mycology it is
a good color book, with good, permanent, ample specimens of colors named.
When Monsieur Klincksieck told me that he was working on a color book,

439

I had great hopes, for Klincksieck has a pretty good business head and I
thought he would get out something practical.10 I am very much disappointed
with the book as it was issued, being only a series of small sample colors
with numbers. Numbers give no idea of 'colors that can be expressed to another,
though perhaps convenient for keeping private memoranda. You can, however,
send ten cents to A. E. Wilde Co., 28 E. Seventh St., Cincinnati, Ohio, and get a
sample book of kindergarten color papers that will answer the same purpose.
What we need in mycology is a good book with color names, for colors have
names, though I think there is no other subject in general less known or as uncer-
tain, unless it is fungus names. Because we do not know them is no reason why
we should not have a book to learn them. The chrysanthemum lovers are more
practical than mycologists. They publish a book11 with ample color samples
with names of the color in English, French, German, etc. Each color is given
a distinctive name, a name taken from use in commerce or the silk industry, or
chemicals, or flowers, or the house-painter, or some other recognized definite
source.

The house-painters have clearer ideas as to colors than mycologists have,,
for the house-painter can tell his workman to paint a house a dark terra-cotta
and the workman will know exactly how to mix the paint. A mycologist can
write that his spores are ferruginous, and the reader will -not know whether
they are a dirty yellow or a chocolate brown. It is unfortunate that this
chrysanthemum book is such a cumbersome, inconvenient and expensive affair.
Otherwise I think it would have a large sale among the mycologists where
there is a genuine need for a good color book. In future when I wish to
express myself in definite color' terms I shall use this chrysanthemum book.
They are at least definite, and carry some idea of their meaning with them.
While such names as Mars yellow, Quaker drab and blood brown may not
seem very scientific and perhaps can not be translated into pidgin Latin, they
have a definite meaning, and convey some idea even to those who do not have
the book. I admit I know very little about colors, and in the past have used-
such terms as "reddish," "yellowish," etc., that have no real meaning. With
the aid of this chrysanthemum bock I hcpe to be a little more definite in future.

PLEUROTUS NIDULANS IS FETID.

We recorded several years ago that this plant is fetid, but have seen no
other •" reference3 to it in any other publication. We found it in Sweden a
number of times and. it certainly has a very nauseous odor when fresh.
It has various local names. For many years it masqueraded in the United
States as Panus dorsalis, and even recently Kellerman perpetuated this joke.
Then Peck -discovered it had pink spores and called it Claudopus nidulans.
A wonderful discovery was also made by Quelet in France, that it had "citrin-
incarnat" spores and was a Crepidottis. Furthermore, with a date dictionary
and Fries' synonyms he unearthed one of Paulet's old names, jonquilla, hence
the plant is often called in France, Crepidotus jonquilla. Mycology ought to
introduce the Bertillion system to identify the various aliases under which fungi
pass. In connection with the record that the plant is fetid, it is interesting
to know that Panus foetans described from Switzerland is also the same thing.

10 This article was written with th - hope of interesting Monsieur Paul Klinck-ieck in the ne-ds,
of mycologists for a color book with col r names. He was a practical man, and could have given us a
practical book. We were very much shocked to learn of Monsieur Klinckrieck's death which
occurred before the article was printed.

» Repertoire thr-Couleurs, I.ibrairc Agricok, Paris, 1905. Price, about five dolfars.

440

NEW PUFF BALLS FROM SOUTH AMERICA.

In a recent number of the "Arkiv for Botanik," Robert E. Fries
has given an interesting account of the Gastromycetes that he -col-
lected in Bolivia and Argentina, including three very distinct and
marked new species.24 My readers may be surprised that I should be
interested in "new species" but I take the same interest in them that
I do in old ones, provided that they are new to others besides the
author. All of Mr. Fries' work, both as to new and old species, is
correctly done,25 and it is a marked improvement over the careless
and inaccurate work that was current fifteen or twenty years ago.
Mr. Fries does not agree with me as to names in a number of 'in-
stances, but that is a matter to which I take no exceptions. As long as
he gets the facts correct, the names will take care "of themselves in
time. The following is a synopsis of the paper :

Phalloids. — Simblum sphaerccephalum, which, according to the illustration,
takes a rather depauperate form.

Itajahya galericulata, with fine illustrations. Heretofore only known from
Brazil, unless the doubtful "Alboffiella argentina" proves to be the same, as
Fries suggests, and which is quite probable.

Lycoperdaceae. — The common puff balls of the world that Fries records
are Lycoperdon pusillum, Lycoperdon Wrightii, Calvatia lilacina, Catastoma
subterraneum, Lanopila bicolor, Mycenastrum Corium, Geaster striatulus, Geaster
asper, Geaster saccatus, Geaster velutinus, Tylostoma albicans, and Tylostoma
Berteroanum. Calvatia rubroflava, a rather rare species of the United States,
is also recorded. It has been found in Brazil and recently in Australia.
Geaster peruvianus is recorded, which was heretofore only known from the
type at Kew.

Phellorina argentinensis is figured and seems from the figure to be dis-
tinct from the African species. It has a strongly developed outer veil or volva,
on which Spegazzini based the genus Cypellomyces. Mr. Fries concluded,
doubtless correctly, that it is only a stronger development of what is found
in the African species and is not of generic importance.

Battarrea Gaudichaudii is also recorded. I am satisfied this species is the
same as Battarrea Steveniil of Russia and is, in fact, only a robust form of
Battarrea phalloides.

Nidulariaceae. — Mr. Fries records three of the common tropical forms,
Cyathus Montagnei, Cyathus stercoreus, and Cyathus Poeppigii. The latter he
shows, quite conclusively to my mind, to be the same as Cyathus plicatus,
a prior name. I have always had but little doubt on the subject, although I
have never examined the type of Cyathus plicatus, but even if true I think

24 They are all new and good unless they have been named by Spegazzini. No one
knows anything about Spegazzini's work. Like all hit-and-miss new species exploiters, he un-
doubtedly gets from time to time more or less that are really good. I do not pretend to be
able to tell which they are, for I have no means to even guess intelligentjy. I should be glad
(as would others of whom I know in Europe) to conserve any of Spegazzini's names that have
any merit, if we had any way to do it. A few of Spegazzini's puff balls have strayed into
Europe in Balansa's exsiccata, most of them mis-named. If Spegazzini will send a set of his
"new species" to any museum in Europe, I should be glad to study them and adopt and pre-
serve any names that have any merit, and reject such as have none. It is possible, even prob-
able, that some of Mr. Fries's species have been "described" by Spegazzini, but no one has
any way of knowing.

23 I note but one error, and that one was evidently taken from my publications, though
I have since corrected it. Geaster Berkeley: is not a synonym for Geaster asper. It is a quite
different plant.

441

the name should not be dug up to displace better work, and Mr. Fries seems
to think the same — at least, he does not do it.

New Species. — Three interesting new species are described and well illus-
trated :

Lycoperdon abscissum, a most curious plant that might well be made the
type of a "new genus." It is almost all sterile base. In fact, I thought it was

Fig. 252.

Lycoperdon abscissum.

a sterile base when I first saw it, but it has normally a very thin, scanty layer
of fertile gleba. The spores, capillitium, cortex, shape, in fact everything
points to its being a degenerate form of Lycoperdon pratense, and if only
known from a single specimen I should so consider it. But Mr. Fries has
abundant collections from various localities and finds it a constant, normal
plant in both Bolivia and Argentina. It is the most curious puff ball that
has been brought to light for some time.

Lanopila pygmaea is an interesting addition to a small genus, heretofore
only known from a single though widespread species, Lanopila bicolor. It
has all the generic characters of the genus Lanopi'.a, but has no resemblance
to Lanopila bicolor, having a very small size and olive, smooth spores.

442

Catastoma Pila is a plant that I have known several years. I received
it first from W. H. Long, Jr., Texas, and I wrote Mr. Long it was a new
species and urged him to name and describe it. Mr. Long has been too long
about it. It has since reached me from other correspondents, both North and
South America. Its characters are the purplish color of both gleba and

Fig 254
Catastoma Pila.

peridium, and the rough, short, pedicellate spores (the pedicels are not shown
in Mr. Fries' figure). In general appearance and even in size it closely re-
sembles our Bovista Pila of the United States, so that the plant is well named.
Tylostoma leiospora is also proposed as a new species, but Tylostoma is
a difficult genus and I would prefer not to pass on a collection without a
comparative study.

MILK IN POLYPORUS.

"During August and September I had the opportunity to observe Polyporus
sulphureus in every stage of growth in great abundance. During the stage
while the pores were attaining growth, usually three or four days, the fungus
was invariably filled with yellow milk. In many cases this ivas so abundant
that it dripped from the fungus when broken. August was a month of abundant
rain in New Hampshire. I have not had an opportunity to observe the growth
of this plant so carefully in dry weather, so that I can not state whether the
plant would always be milky in dry weather. This is the only Polyporus
that I have observed which is really milky, though I have found a number
of species which in wet weather are filled with moisture and under certain
atmospheric conditions appear to secrete a drop of clear fluid, as for example
in Polyporus circinatus. It is always in a young stage of the plant, and is in
some cases slightly turbid as it exudes from a broken plant." — Theodate L. Smith.

THE GENUS MATULA. — An investigation at Kew convinces me there
is no valid reason for not taking the- generic name Matula. Berkeley first
published it as Artocreas but that was only an unintentional transposition for
Michenera, for he refers the Ceylon species (Matula poroniaeformis) to a
genus previously published from Cuba (Micheneri Artocreas) and transposes it
(Artocreas Micheneri). An examination of the specimens from Cuba and
Pennsylvania shows both to be co-generic (at least to all appearances) and very
different from the Ceylonese and Brazilian genus Matula.

CORRECTION. — The statement in Letter No. 23 that Fomes pomaceus
is not Polyporus fulvus of Scopoli was due to an error of the type. I do
not know Polyporus fulvus in the sense of Scopoli, and I question if any
one knows much that is definite on that score.

443

A NEW POLYPOROID GENUS.

BY N. J. McGiNTY.

Our literature is enriched by a wonderful boletoid genus discovered
by the late Dr. Hennings, which has a volva at the base. He called it
Volvoboletus, and reconstructed a picture from Persoon's old work to
illustrate it. It grew in France, that is, it was said to grow in France
about a hundred years ago, but it is remarkable how elusive these things

Fig. 255
Volvopolyporus peronatus.

are, for none of the present generation of French mycologists have
ever found it, and some of them are unkind enough to surmise that
it exists only in imagination. I trust they will not be so skeptical as
to the new genus that I propose herewith, as I present a figure that
can not be questioned, the type illustration, and also proof that
cinches it, a Latin (pidgin) diagnosis in keeping with the " rules."

VOIvVOPOLYPORUS, N. G., McGINTY.— Tubuli in stratum porosum, facile
ab hymenophoro separabile. Stipite centrali. Totus fungus primitis quidem
in volva inclusus. Volva persistentis, cum basi stipitis connata.

But one species of Volvopolyporus is known (viz.: Volvopolyporus
peronatus (Schulz) McGinty), like the celebrated genus Dictybole
that is only known from a drawing. It was said to grow in the
beech woods in Hungary.

444

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. LLOYD.

No. 34.

CINCINNATI, O. FEBRUARY, 1910.

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 01942

PROFESSOR MASSEE.

Those who have worked at Kew will recognize the portrait on
the preceding page, and those who have not will be glad to have a
good portrait of Professor George Massee, whose official title at Kew
is The Principal Assistant, (Crytogams). I am under many obliga-
tions to Professor Massee for courtesies while working at Kew, and
take pleasure in presenting a good photograph of him to the readers
of Mycological Notes. Particularly am I glad in view of the publi-
cation a few years ago of a most miserable likeness in one of our
American journals.

The following biography is said to have been written by Professor
Massee. Any one who is intimately acquainted with him will not
doubt it, but will recognize in it his peculiar style.

My full name is George Edward Massee. I was born in 1850, at Scampston,
a hamlet in East Yorkshire. Here they attempted to educate me at a private
school, but failed : I had only a liking for drawing and nature. It was intended
that I should follow in my father's steps and be a farmer, but I did very little
good at farming. I was sent to the York School of Art, where I was fortunate
enough to gain the national medal of the year for drawing flowers from nature.
At the same time I studied chemistry and physics. Then I was taken in hand
by Dr. Spruce, the botanist and traveler, who was a relation of my mother's,
and when not ploughing or working in the sheepfold, I worked hard at botany.
The illustrations of Dr. Spruce's classical work on Hepaticas were mostly my
work. At his suggestion, I went to the West Indies and South America to
study plants and collect orchids. I sent home in bulk Oncidium macranthum
and Nanodes Medusae. Among my many exciting experiences during that
expedition were earthquakes.

Being an only son, my mother prevailed on me to stop at home, so I again
took up the work of farming and botanical study, specializing on fungi and
plant diseases. On my father's death I came to Kew, where I worked at the
herbarium as a free lance, and in 1893 was appointed Principal Assistant
(Crytogams)."

A SLIGHT CORRECTION.— We recently stated, in a footnote, that
Polystictus biformis and pergamenus have been "transposed" since Klotzsch
published them. "Confused" would have been a better word, for we find on
going into the subject again that there is not the slightest evidence that Klotzsch
ever saw the plant that has for more than sixty years been known as "Polyporus
biformis, Klotzsch," not forgetting to add the "Klotzsch." What he called
"biformis," Fries and every one since has called pergamenus. I shall continue
to call the plant Polystictus biformis, that being the well established name
for it, but I shall not go through the farce of writing "Klotzsch" after it.
If you have to add a name, add "Berkeley," who gave the name its present
meaning in mycology.

SPIRIT WORK.— I notice in Saccardo, Vol. 6. p. 709, that Persoon pub-
lished a new species of Clavaria in the Journal of the Linnean Society, volume
18. As this volume was not issued until about fifty years after Persoon died,
it was probably through the aid of a medium. It is pretty severe, with all
that mycology suffered from the living in the line of "new species" of Clavaria,
if the dead ones are going to continue in the work.

446

CLATHRUS CIBARIUS.

Through the kindness of H. W. Laing, Lyttelton, New Zealand,
\ve are able to present a photograph of this phalloid. Though the
most common phalloid in New Zealand, this is the first published pho-
tograph made to show its size, and it will be noted from the scale that
Mr. Laing has thoughtfully photographed on it, our reproduction is
reduced one-half the natural size.

Fig. 267.

Clathrus cibarius (reduced one-half).
Photograph from H. W. Laing, New Zealand.

From Mr. Laing's letter we learn the following in regard to the
habits and characters of the plant.

Clathrus cibarius is pure white, except of course when covered
with the foetid, brownish gleba. It grew in clusters in the rank grass
in moist situations, and never in the open country where the grass is

447

cropped short by grazing. The photograph represents specimens (one-
half) the usual size, though in some cases they attain double this di-
mension. That would indicate a diameter of about sixteen inches for
the largest specimens. It is the largest Clathrus known. The base of
the network is always wrinkled and the entire plant is very tender
and fragile.

Our best thanks are extended to Mr. Laing for the photograph
and information, which give us exactly the points of interest we de-
sired. We hope now some of our Australian friends will furnish a
photograph and notes on Clathrus gracilis, which is common in Austra-
lia but has never been photographed.

A NEW WORK ON FUNGI.

Simple, introductory books on fungi are badly needed in the Eng-
lish language, and I am particularly glad to call the attention of our
American mycologists to a book recently issued in England. It is by
E. W. Swanton, entitled "Fungi and how to know them." It is writ-
ten in plain, simple language, and is profusely illustrated, and any
American student can take this book and determine not only almost
all the genera, but many of the species he will meet in our country.
It is a curious fact, but it is true that the species that occur in Eng-
land are by far the greater part the same as occur in America and
the temperate world in general.

The Gastromycetes of Mr. Swanton's book are (with one ex-
ception) correctly classified and named.1 We commend the book not
only for what it contains but for what it omits. Wre note with pleasure
the absence of a number of myths that commonly occur in the "puff-
ball" literature of England.

There is another feature for which I think the book should be
highly praised, the absence of all personal advertisements. Plants have
Latin names, and as the usual English reader does not speak Latin
very fluently, it is very useful to employ space, as Mr. Swanton does,
to explain the meaning of these Latin names. Much more useful, in
my opinion, than to occupy the same space with a lot of personal
names of no possible interest except to the parties concerned, and
most of them are dead.

The American student who has two recently issued books, viz.:
Swanton — "Fungi and how to 'know them" and Hard — "Mushrooms
edible and otherwise" is in good position to make rapid advancement
in his knowledge of the fungi he finds. Swanton's work is probably
not on sale in America, but can be obtained by sending two dollars
to G. E. Stechert & Co., No. 129 W. 2Oth St.,' New York, who will
import the book on request.

There are some cases, such as Myriostoma coliformis which appears as Geaster coli
formis, which are differences of opinion, not errors. I!ut Rovista pusilla is an error, for il
can not be included in the genus Bovista under any logical classification.

448

THE VEIL OF CLAUTRIAVIA MERULINA.

Professor T. Fetch, who has done such good work with the phal-
loids of Ceylon, sends me an interesting photograph (Fig. 268)
showing the attachment of the veil of Clautriavia merulina. This, I
think, was previously
unknown. As will be
noted from the photo-
graph, it is confluent
with the upper portion
of the stipe in a man-
ner not found (or, at
least, not known) in
any species of Phallus.

It will perhaps not
be out of place here to
call attention of ob-
servers throughout the
tropical world to the
aid that can be ren-
dered science by pho-
tographing the p h a 1-
1 o i d s they note. Es-
pecially if the phalloid
seems to present any
points of novelty from
those shown in our
photograph in the re-
cent pamphlet, "Syn-
opsis of the Known
Phalloids." A good
photograph is the best
record one can make of
a phalloid, and if ac-
companied with a color
sketch is all that is nec-
essary to give a good
account of it. A dried
specimen of the phal-
loid, if large, or an al-
coholic specimen in a
little tube, if s m a 1 1,
should also be pre-
served. But a good

photograph is the eS-

sential. It is not in
good taste to complain of the many inaccurate figures and accounts
that we have in our phalloid literature, for the collectors in former
days probably did the best they could. In these days of universal

449

Flo. 2bts

Section of Clautriavia merulina (pileus removed) showing
attachment of the veil.

photography, I think no phalloid should be published unless accom-
panied by a good photograph.

As stated in my recent pamphlet, more has been learned of phal-
loids in the last ten years through the work of Fetch, Penzig, Moeller,
Long, and Cobb, with their cameras, than was known before. And,
it is reliable work. If previous observers had employed photography
we would not have to admit to-day that of the one hundred and seven
supposed species and forms of phalloids, fifty-eight (or 54%) are
doubtful. And the story has not by any means been told as yet.
There are vast regions of the earth's surface of which nothing is
known of the phalloids, and many are yet to be found and named.
We feel that our recent "Synopsis of the Known Phalloids" has
brought the subject so that any one can study it intelligently, and
if those who have received the pamphlet will use their eyes and their
cameras, more will be learned in the next ten years than has been
learned up to date. Especially as to the distribution and variation of
the "old species," which is of more interest than the publication of
the "new species." That which I commend most in the work pre-
viously stated of Messrs. Penzig, Moeller, Long and Petch is that
they gave full accounts of the "old species" they found as well as
the new. Cobb marred his paper with a lot of (fictitious) new species,
but there is no criticism to be made of the work of the others.

IRPEX FLAVUS "KLOTZ." AND POLYSTICTUS FLAVUS "JUNGH."

1 feel that an error has been made in Saccardo (vol. 6, page 486) and in
the determination of many tropical specimens, in referring a very common,
tropical Polystictus to Irpex flavus "Klotz." I am well acquainted with the
tropical form in Samoa and in the museums, where it is generally called (at
Berlin at least) "Irpex flavus, Klotz." Klotzsch's type specimens are at Berlin,
and while, by comparison, they seem to be very close to the tropical species,
I am satisfied they are not the same plant. The tropical plant, which is wide-
spread in warm countries,2 was first illustrated (and beautifully) by Junghuhn.
from Java, under the name Polyporus flavug. It is one of those intermediate
species like "Poria" Tulipifera that can be put either in the Polyporoid series
or the Hydnpid series. Klotzsch's plant is of arctic origin and came from
British America, and I think does not extend even into temperate regions. At
least it is unknown from the United States, and if it were the tropical species
there surely would not be a gap in distribution between the arctic and tropical
regions. By comparison the two plants seem very close, nor could I note any
material difference in their "structure" under the microscope. I think, however,
they are different in this regard that the arctic species is a true Poria, always
resupinate with shallow pores that have thin, angular walls prolonged into teeth.3
The teeth are to a degree awl shaped. The tropical species is normally pilente
and while it is the same old genus (in the sense of Persoon) the teeth are
much longer and flatter. The color of the two plants is very similar, but is a
brighter yellow in the tropical plant. Still the two plants are very close, and
if they occurred over the same regions it would be very difficult to distinguish
them.

2 At Berlin there are specimens from India, Africa, Australia, Philippines, Samoa and South
America.

3 Exactly the idea of the genus Sistrotrema in the sense of Persoon but not in the restricted,
Friesian sense.

450

YELLOW SIMBLUMS.

We make our "species" and then we tear them down. The more
plants we know the less species we find. A letter and figure of a
Simblum just received from C. A. O'Connor, Mauritius, raises the
question if there is more than one yellow species of
Simblum. About a year ago we thought and pub-
lished that there were three distinct yellow species
of Simblum. Then we saw a series of specimens
at Upsala that so intimately connected two of them
that we reduced our number of valid (supposed)
species to two. Now Mr. O'Connor comes along
with his figure and raises the doubt if there is
more than one.

Mauritius is the birthplace of the genus
Simblum. A specimen from Mr. Telfair, now pre-
served at Kew, was evidently well illustrated by
Hooker. It was an obese plant, with a thick stem
(about two inches thick), and network merely a
continuation (in size) of the stem. The genus is
evidently rare in Mauritius, for Mr. O'Connor has
only found it recently. He sends a sketch (Fig.
269) of his find,4 evidently well made. It is the
exact shape and size of the plant recently described
as Simblum Texense from the United States, and
which was supposed to differ from the original
Mauritian species (Simblum periphragmoides) by
its shape and size alone. Of course both "species"
may grow in Mauritius, but I do not place much value on that theory.
I maintain sometimes that shape and size do make a good species, as
in the case of Scleroderma tenerum, but always in connection with
a geographical difference. I expect in time we shall have to refer
all our yellow Simblums to one species.

Fig 269

DAEDALEA UNICOLOR VAR. HYDNOIDEA.

What was surely an irpicoid condition of the common Daedalea unicolor
has been collected several times around Berlin and was called as above by
Dr. Hennings. I think it is hardly worthy of a separate name although a
curious condition. Dr. Hennings has given a full account of it from which
we cull the following. It was first gathered by Dr. Magnus in 1876 and sent
to Elias Fries (at that time a very old man) who thought it was a new species
of Hydnum related to Hydnum strigosum. Dr. Magnus also sent it to Karsten,
who discovered at once that it was a new genus and named it "Phyllodontia
Magnusii." It did not take much provocation for Karsten to discover a new
genus. He was almost as adept at it as our own Mr. Murrill. A similar
form was also distributed "de Thumen, Exsic. 621 as Irpex lacteus, Fr." (sic).
I think it was Bresadola who set all this muddle right. At least his correction
is found on the specimens both at Berlin and Upsala.

4 The specimen that Mr. O'Connor sent me in alcohol, fully bears out his figure.
451

Fig. 270.

Bovistella echinella (x6).

A BOVISTELLA WITH A GEASTER MOUTH.

Robert E. Fries has collected at Torne Trask, Lapland, the rare
little Bovistella echinella, which is the sixth collection known of this

rare little species
and the second made
in Europe. The col-
lection presents all
the usual characters
of this unique spe-
cies, and some speci-
mens have protrud-
i n g mouths, as
shown in our photo-
graph (Fig. 270,
X6) . This is a fea-
ture common in Ge-
asters, but which I
never before noted
on a Lycoperdon or
Bovistella. In ex-
amining my original
photograph of this
species I note indi-
cations of this pro-
truding mouth (Plate 89), a feature that escaped me at the time.
A full account of this rare, little species was given (Myc. Notes,
page 286, Plate 89), with a list of the previously known stations. The
photograph herewith is somewhat misleading, as the "cup" at the
base is a piece of earth and not a part of the plant, as might appear.
It is enlarged (X6), as Bovistella echinella is one of the smallest and
rarest "puff balls" known.

GUI BONO?

In a separate cover at Berlin are specimens distributed by C. F. Baker,
under the name Cyathus lentiferus, "Determined by Miss White." As Miss
White never recognized the genus Cyathus in her publication, she seems to
have repudiated her own work, which was a wise thing to do in view of the fact
that her genus "Cyathia" (sic) was such a silly proposition.

In another cover at Berlin are probably a hundred specimens of exactly
the same plant labeled, Cyathus vernicosus, as the plant is known to every
one except Miss White. The young man who incorporated the Baker specimens
did not recognize Miss White's juggling and therefore made a useless new
cover for it. But all name-juggling is not done at New York. The Europeans
have had several themselves, who with their little date dictionaries look up the
dates given in Fries and Persoon and proceed to change names. Three covers,
one after the other, at Berlin, Fomes pinicola, Fomes marginatus, and Fomes
ungulatus, all exactly the same plant, pose in the collection as different plants,
due to such changing. The old botanists, Persoon and Fries, had ideas of
distinction between Fomes pinicola and Fomes marginatus, and even if we
can not agree with them we recognize that they had definite ideas on the
subject. The present school of jugglers seems devoid of all ideas except that
one date is earlier than another date, with the intimation that Persoon and
Fries did not know enough to know that.

452

THE EXOPERIDIUM OF BOVISTA.

I found in the park at Upsala some specimens of a young "puff
ball" that at first puzzled me considerably. It had a thick, smooth
exoperidium, about 700 mic. thick, and composed of large, globose
cells (parenchymatous tissue) 30-35 mic. in diameter. Our figure

271 shows a specimen with the ex-
operidium partially cut away, ex-
posing the inner peridium.

I knew no "puff ball" with such
an exoperidium, but a miscroscopic
examination showed the peculiar cap-
illitium of a Bovista, and then I rec-
ognized it as young specimens of Bo-
vista nigrescens, the only puff ball
it could possibly be. I am quite fa-
miliar with mature specimens of Bo-
vista nigrescens (and also the anal-
ogous Bovista Pila of America), and
no sign of an exoperidium in seen on
the mature plant. What becomes of

it? It certainly does not peel away in patches as does the exoperid-
ium of a Catastoma, or patches of it would sometimes remain. There
can be but one explanation. It disappears in ripening, I think, by
a process of deliquescence, the same as many of the cells of the gleba
do. Morgan suggested this to me years ago, but I never fully be-
lieved it until now. The account of the peridia of the genus Bovista,
as found in Myc. Notes, page 114, is entirely wrong.

This deliquescence of the exoperidium of a Bovista explains other
things not correctly interpreted before. Thus, the scurfy particles
often noted on the common Bovista plumbea are due, no doubt, to
imperfect deliquescence. The rare and little known Bovista tomen-
tosa of Europe and Australia (cfr. Myc. Notes, page 392) when
young has an exoperidium covered with small spines, and when old
is as smooth as a billiard ball. Deliquescence alone, I think, can
explain that, for if the spines shriveled up and fell away (as they
do in the genus Lycoperdon), traces of them would surely remain.

PHALLUS INDUSIATUS.— As is well known, this is the most common
phalloid of the tropics and grows in perhaps every warm country of the world.
S. Hutchings, of North Bengal, India, writes me it is the only phalloid he
notices and that it is plentiful during the rainy season in May and June. I
recently met at Kew Mr. C. B. Ussher, who has sent me a number of specimens
of this same species from British East Africa. He is a botanist for a rubber
company and is located in dense forests where only a few years ago pygmy
natives were the only ones to be found. He tells me that this phalloid usually
grows in swampy places in the depths of the forest. It is the first time I have
known of this species favoring swampy ground.

453

LES SOUCIS D'UN MYCOLOGUE.

Nous avons en Anglais un dicton : "Ne me confiez pas vos soucis,
j'en ai bien assez a moi !" cependant je ne puis m'empecher de m'ouvrir
a mes lecteurs au sujet de quelques unes des difficultes que Ton eprouve
lorsqu'on veut arriver a une conclusion tant soit peu satisfaisante a
1'egard des sections difficiles telles que les Porias d'Europe. Prenez
un ouvrage quelconque traitant des champignons d'Europe ; vous me
direz que la chose vous parait fort facile, que la question a etc traitee
et etudiee a fond et que tout ce qu'on a a faire c'est d'aller dans les
bois, de cueillir les specimens, puis de se servir des ouvrages publics,
pour les determiner. Cela est vrai, naturellement, pour un grand
nombre des plantes ordinaires et bien connues mais pour les sections
plus difficiles, telles que la Poria, et plus specialement le Corticium
(auxquelles je ne pretends rien comprendre du tout) il est dix fois
plus difficile de trouver un nom satisfaisant pour vos plantes que d'ap-
prendre les caracteristiques de la plante.

Pendant la premiere saison que je passai a Upsala je trouvai une
Poria tres etrange. Elle paraissait d'abord comme un tampon myce-
lial et mou ressemblant a une pelote de coton ; les pores paraissaient
d'abord au centre puis s'etendaient sur toute la surface. Depuis long-
temps je connaissais Poria bombycina par oui-dire ; Fries disait qu'elle
se developpait tout justement de cette meme maniere et c'est pour
cela qu'il la nomma ainsi ; mais c'est la seule Poria qu'il decrive ainsi.
Je n'aimais pas la description de la couleur "jaune sordide" mais je
ne doutais pas que ce ne fut la meme plante, et pendant toute cette
saison je la recueillis en abondance — sans jamais mettre en question
son identite ; pour moi c'etait la Poria bombycina. A la fin de la sai-
son, j'etudiai les plantes dans 1'herbier de Fries. II s'y trouve peu
de types authentiques la, mais il y en avait un assurement de la Poria
bombycina venant de Femsjo(!). Et ce n'etait certainement pas ma
plante. Alors je fus entierement deconcerte.

Un jour en examinant les Icones de Fries je remarquai sa planche
de Merulius himantioides. Elle me parait bien representer ma plante
mais Fries la decrit comme etant couleur "lilas" et "semblable a
Merulius lacrymans." Ma plante n'etait pas lilas et ne ressemblait pas
a Merulius lacrymans. Je ne pouvais cependant que croire que ce
tableau representait ma plante et j'en conclus que c'etait une Meru-
lius himantioides. A mon retour a Paris j'envoyai un specimen a
Bresadola. II la determina comme "Merulius himantioides Fr." Alors
je fus satis fait. C'etait Merulius himantioides ! ! ! !

L'hiver suivant a Kew je trouvai un specimen de Merulius hi-
mantioides que Fries avait envoye a Berkeley. Ce n'etait pas ma
plante. Les spores etaient absolument differentes, ressemblant, de
fait, a Merulius lacrymans a laquelle Fries avait compare 1'himanti-
oides. Me voila de nouveau deroute. Je racontai mes perplexites a
1'abbe Bresadola qui me calma en observant que Fries ne s'etait pas
servi du microscope et ne regardait pas les spores ; qu'il s'etait par con-

454

sequent trompe dans le specimen envoye a Berkeley. Je crus ceci a
moitie mais je n'etais pas entierement rassure.

Et voici que mon ami Romell vient me troubler de nouveau. II
trouve dans la Suede du Nord une plante qui correspond absolument
a la description de Merulius himantioides de Fries; couleur lilas, "bom-
bycinus," et qui a les memes spores que le specimen de Kew. Je ne
saurais nier pareil temoignage. Romell a trouve la veritable Meru-
lius himantioides. Mais me voici au meme point qu'en commencant :
je n'ai aucun nom pour mon "bombycina" commun, plante trouvee a
Upsala.

L'ete dernier a Ferns jo j'appris a connaitre Poria bombycina
sans question. Elle correspond absolument a la description de Fries
et a son specimen a Upsala. Dans les trois derniers musees que
j'ai visite il y a 14 specimens etiquettes "Poria bombycina Fr." Dans
toute la quantite tin seul specimen est correctement determine et il
venait de Suede, et probablement de Fries. D'autres out evidcm-
ment eu leurs soucis de meme que tnoi.

THE NIDULARIACEAE AT BERLIN.

At the date of my previous visit to Berlin I had not studied the
Nidulariaceae. There are a few historic specimens there.

Ehrenberg's type of Cyathus globosus. It is a Nidularia, and in
my opinion there is but one (similar) species in Europe, viz: Nidularia
pisiformis. Also at Berlin are good collections of Nidularia confluens,
which for me is only a caespitose form of the same thing.

The type of "Cyathus niveo-tomentosus" from California, proves
to be the rare genus Nidula. In fact it is the same as Nidula micro-
carpa and an earlier specific name for it. As Miss White did good
generic work in establishing the genus Nidula, I accept her work and
her names for this genus, and I trust she will appreciate that if I
juggled her names as she has juggled others I would call the plant
"Nidula niveo-tomentosa (Hennings) Lloyd."

In a cover labeled "Cyathus scutellaris, Roth." is an old specimen
so-labeled in a German handwriting. I do not know that it has any
historic value, but if it has, then the species is a synonym for
Crucibulum vulgare.

Dr. Hennings made three collections of Cyathus stercoreus at
Berlin. It is a rare plant in Europe, but Dr. Hennings was a good
hunter.

Cyathus sulcatus, discovered to be a new species by Kalchbrenner,
is Cyathus Poeppigii, the most common species of warm countries.
These specimens have spores 28 x 40 mic.

The original exsiccatae containing "Cyathus plicatulus Mss., Cuba,
Poeppig" are also at Berlin. It is on these exsiccatae that Tulasne
based his Cyathus Poeppigii. A spore measures 32 x 44, As it has
proved to be such a common species in all tropical countries, it is
doubly unfortunate that Tulasne changed the very suitable name pli-
catulus to the uncouth name "Poeppigii."

455

PSEUDOCOLUS JAVANICUS IN FORMOSA.

I have recently received from Professor S. Kusano, Japan, a drawing
(Fig. 272) of Pseudocolus Javanicus, which he made in February, 1909, in
Central Formosa. The drawing is natural size and the
color red. It represents a more globose plant than the
original photograph from Java, but I think is evidently the
same species.

Pseudocolus Javanicus was originally from Java (as
its name implies), but is quite a rare plant there. Dr.
Penzig found but a single specimen, and Dr. Bernard has
not found it at all. It occurs, however, also in China, at
least I believe a specimen from China in alcohol at Paris
is this species. It is much broken and was described as a
new species of Anthurus. Professor Kusano found only
three specimens "on the rotten stems of grass" in the
mountainous region of the Central Formosa." _ It is an
important addition to our knowledge of the distribution of
the phalloids.

Of course, from a sketch only I can not be positive
that this is the same as the Penzig species of Java. I
think it is, although a new, globose form. The arms have
the same general arrangement. What I presume was an
excellent figure of Pseudocolus Javanicus was given by
Penzig and was reproduced in our recent "Synopsis of
the Phalloids," page 52. I suspect in time it will be found
to be the same as Professor Kusano found in Formosa.
Nor should I be surprised if it developed in time that Pseudocolus rugulosus
is an inaccurate figure of the same species.

Fig. 272.

THE TYPE SPECIES.

I believe it was Mr. Ricker who asked me one day if I believed
in the principle of a "type species" for each genus. Yes, I believe
in it. I believe it is the greatest scheme for name juggling that was
ever invented since the late and lamented Otto Kuntze promulgated
his plan.

It works most admirably. First, you take a large genus like the
Desmodium, for instance, and you look up the synonyms in Index
Kewensis and find the first generic name that was applied to each
species. When you have your dates all hunted up, "restore" the name
that bears the earliest date and call that your "type species." Then
you change all the others (for the purpose of uniformity, of course),
and the more there are the better, for you always add your own name
to each, it being incidental, the main object being to produce uni-
formity of result and permanency in nomenclature.

I do not know who invented the "type species" scheme, but
who ever he was, he was a genius, and his talents ought to have
public recognition. The next Congress of International Name-Jugglers
should raise a fund for two pedestals. On one they should put a
bust of Otto Kuntze, and on the other of this unknown genius who
invented the "type species" idea.

456

A NEW TYPE IN THE GENUS BOVISTELLA.

When we wrote our account of the genus Bovistella I knew no
species with typical, separate capillitium threads and non pedicellate
spores (cfr. last note, page 278). Such a plant has just come to
hand from E. Jarvis, Brisbane, Australia, and is an interesting addi-
tion to the genus Bovistella. It belongs to Section 4 of the genus
and differs from all other known species of this section in not hav-
ing pedicellate spores.

BOVISTELLA PUSILLA (Fig. 273).— Plant globose, i to

^^^ ^^^^ ll//2 cm' in dianleter- Cortex smooth. Perid-

^fflfl^k j^, mm thin, flaccid. Sterile base, none. Gleba

fl HflEj^kk jv dark brown. Capillitium of separate, deeply

•V^K I|B colored threads, the main stem of the thread

^^^^T ^^^B^^^ ^ niic. thick, with numerous sharp, tapering

flj* branches. Spores compressed globose or

273 slightly ovoid, 4 x 4^/2 mic., deep colored,

smooth, with a short but distinct apiculus.

This little species in size, color and general appearance resem-
bles closely Lycoperdon pusillum, but is entirely different in its capil-
litium characters. The separate threads with their thick, main stems
and numerous, tapering branches are similar to those of Boviste ni-
grescens. It is the first plant known with such threads and non pedi-
cellate spores.

THE NEW GENUS MARTELLA.
BY N. J. McGixTv.

In looking through the rare genus which for a hundred years has been
incorrectly called Hericium, I note by the synonyms given in Saccardo that
Scopoli called a species Martella Echinus. The generic name, Hericium, was
proposed by Persoon, but every one knows that Scopoli wrote before Persoon
did. Hence, by the sacred principles of priority set forth by our illustrious
master, Otto Kuntze, I have made a wonderful discovery, and I propose to
take advantage of it for my own advertisement in keeping with the custom
of my illustrious co-workers, such as Hollos, Murrill, Earle, and other date-
dictionary experts. I therefore claim the following new combinations :

Martella Notarisii (Inz.) McGinty, syn. Hydnum Notarisii Inzenga, Sic.
t. 1, f. 1.

Martella Hystrix (Pers.) McGinty, syn. Hericium Hystrix, Pers. Comm.
Clav. p. 27.

Martella alpestre (Pers.) McGinty, syn. Hericium alpestre, Pers. Myc.
Eur. vol. 2, p. 151.

As I have copied my references and synonyms from Saccardo, also in
keeping with the customs of my illustrious co-workers, I disclaim any responsi-
bility for errors.

SCHIZOPHYLLUM COMMUNE IN EUROPE.— In our article on this
species we commented on the fact that the plant is strangely rare over the
greater portion of Europe. I have never collected it, nor has Mr. Romell in
Sweden, nor Professor Lange in Denmark. Professor Magnus, who has col-
lected much in the Tirol, tells me that it is a very abundant plant in the higher
altitudes of the Tyrolean Alps.

457

THE IDENTITY OF PHALLUS RUGULOSUS.

When I wrote the recent "Synopsis of the Known Phalloids," I was much
puzzled to decide what difference existed between Phallus rugulosus of Japan
and Phallus gracilis, which proves to be common in other warm countries.
I finally decided that if there was any difference it was that Phallus rugulosus
did not have the substance of the pileus colored red. It was described from
alcoholic material and I suspected that the color had been extracted by the
alcohol.

I took the matter up by correspondence with Professor S. Kusano, Tokyo,
Japan, who had previously advised me that he found Phallus rugulosus com-
mon in Japan. He has sent me a colored sketch, and he has found the substance
of the pileus red, as well as the stem. There is no question now in my mind
that Phallus rugulosus is a synonym for Phallus gracilis, which is at best a
slender form of Phallus rubicundus, a common plant in many warm countries.

Like all widely distributed plants it has been discovered to be a "new
species" on numerous occasions, and gives promise to rival the celebrated
Phallus indusiatus in the number of its aliases. The following are all that
have come to my notice thus far, with the names of the country whence ex-
ploited. In my opinion all are better referred to Phallus rubicundus, originally
from Southern United States, or to Phallus gracilis, at best a slender form
of it. Phallus rugulosus of Japan ; Phallus sanguineus of Africa ; Phallus
celebicus of the Celebes ; Phallus aurantiacus of India ; Phallus Novae-Hollan-
diae of Australia ; Phallus coralloides of Hawaii ; Phallus Balansae of South
America; Phallus vitellinus of Australia.

POLYPORUS BRAUNII.

I was very much pleased to receive from Monsieur Hariot a fine,
fresh specimen of this plant, collected in a hothouse at Cherbourg.
I had only known the plant from dried specimens, which are common
in the museums of Europe, as the plant has been collected a number
of times in the hothouses. While not a native of Europe, it might
almost be so considered now, as it is not rare in hothouses all over
Europe, and I am told has been found in abandoned mines. When
fresh it is a beautifully marked plant, with pore surface of a bright,
clear yellow. It is the only truly yellow Polyporus I have seen ex-
cept Polyporus croceus, and some Porias. The pores are very small,
the mouths bright yellow. As the pores get old, however, in the in-
terior they lose the yellow color and the context is better called pale.
The prominent microscopic features are numerous, large, rough, hya-
line, cylindrical cystidia, about 8 x 40 mic. I found abundant spores,
very small, 1^x2^2 mic., hyaline, smooth, but I suspect they are
conidial spores. The fresh plant threw down no spores, and Bresa-
dola only records his specimens as sterile.

Classification. — The species is found in Saccardo as Polystictus,
where it appears to me to have no relation. Strictly speaking, it is a
Fomes, for the pores in this specimen are in distinct strata, but many
tropical species are perennial, and I think the only practical way is
to restrict the Fomes of the tropics to specimens with hard, woody
context. Polyporus Engelii (teste Bresadola) and Polyporus rufo-
flavus (teste Patouillard) are other names for it.

458

A EUROPEAN MARE'S NEST.

The literature of Europe has been enriched by a wonderful "new species"
of Poria, which departed from all known species in its habitat, growing on the
pileus of an Agaric. It was discovered by Dr. F. Ludwig, who gave an account
of it in Hedwigia in 1882.

There is a specimen in the herbarium of Winter at Berlin. Bresadola,

who has seen it, endorses on the
label that it is not a Poria at all
but an anomaly of the Agaric
which produces imperfect gills
on top of the pileus. I have
seen just such abnormal agarics
myself, and on closely examining
the specimens there is no doubt
in my mind that Bresadola's
statement is the correct explana-
Fig. 274. tion. Thus the wonderful "new

species" of Dr. Ludwig fades

away into the same class with the wonderful "new genus" Dictybole of Pro-
fessor Atkinson's exploitation. All flesh is mortal. I have recently heard
rumors of a "Poria" that grows on Phalloid eggs in Java. I hope it will
materialize into something definite and not join the Dictybole class.

THE NATURALIST A SANE MAN.

Cartoonists, humorists, and jokesmiths generally have immemorially taken
delight in the kindly people who wander over the green hillsides of spring and
the golden meadows of summer chasing bugs, and eke the butterfly. It is the
custom to point out these gentle folk as a species of harmless creatures, pleas-
antly irresponsible in their actions, a little loose in their upper stories and en-
titled to the guardianship of all the rest of us.

But we are wrong in our diagnosis of the case. The naturalist is the sanest
man in the world. He is the one man among us who gets the best out of life.
He finds himself in a wonderful world and with only one small lifetime in
which to explore that world. He has discovered that there is vastly more for
his consideration than men and women. In fact, he is apt to find that it is
only men and women who are dull and uninteresting. Wherefore the wise
man sallies out to the wide spaces, to the great hills and the deep-hushed val-
leys ; he wanders by the mountain streams and is brother to the sun, moon, and
stars. He visits the things of the wild in their wonderful cities and towns, talks
with the builder ant, the busy, marvelous bee, the birds as they rear their young,
and the squirrel as he gathers his winter store.

And what does this man learn? More than we learn, brethren, in our
stuffy towns, bartering and trading in our sordid marts, missing the beauty,
the miracle, and the wonder of things. Here is California, glowing in the glory
of God's smile. What do we know of it? We know so little, indeed, that when
we shall look back upon it from the streets of the New Jerusalem we shall re-
gret, even there, that we once had it, like a lute, in our hands and never learned
to play on it. — Los Angeles Times.

AMATEUR WORK. — We note from a recent review of Arthur's work in
North American Flora that he has only succeeded in adding his name to
about half of the plants named. A sincere follower of the Kuntze system of
juggling names usually succeeds in from eighty to ninety per cent. What a
contempt a genuine Kuntzeite must have for such amateur work as Arthur
seems to be doing in this line!

459

A NEW GENUS ^TNENSIS.

BY N. J. McGiNTY.

In one of the old museums of Europe there recently came to light
a very curious drawing of what is unquestionably a new genus of
puff ball with an emphasis on the " puff." It was labeled Lycoper-
don clavariaeformis, but as it is certainly a new genus on the order
of Dictybole, it will now become ^Etnensis clavariaeformis, McGinty.
Nothing is known as to the native country or origin of this curious
product, and no specimen is known, hence I am unable to give (in
pidgin L,atin) a diagnosis of this curious genus, as required by the

Fig. 275.

latest "laws." It is not necessary, however, to give any description
of the genus, as the illustration tells its own story. Certainly no
other similar genus exists (or ever did). As the author of this
remarkable species had enough consideration not to impose his won-
derful discovery on the credulity of the mycological world, it would
not be fair to give his name, and I trust no one will recognize his writ-
ing. I have named this curious illustration ^Etnensis, from its evident
resemblance to the mountain of the same name.

As I read over this pamphlet before it goes to press I think per-
haps I have made too much fun of those who may take themselves
seriously. However, I hope it may enable them to see themselves
as others see them.

460

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BY G. G. L-L-OVD.

No. 35.

CINCINNATI, O. MARCH, 1910.

L' ABBE G. BRESADOLA.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN .2 01942

L'ABBE G. BRESADOLA.

II est a mon avis, peu d'hommes en Europe qui puissent etre
compares a 1'abbe Bresadola pour sa connaissance profonde des
champignons europeens. L,ors de ma premiere visite a Paris il y a
plusieurs annees, je demandai a Monsieur Patouillard : " Quels sont
les premiers mycologues d' Europe?" Cette question etait posee au
present, mais il lui plut de Interpreter comme pour le temps passe,
car — haussant les epaules, ce qui chez un Francais est plus expressif
que la parole, il repondit: "II y en avait deux, Persoon et Fries."
Si quelqu'un me posait aujourd'hui cette meme question, je serai
dispose a en ajouter un troisieme : Bresadola.

Je ne crois pas que 1'oeuvre de Bresadola vienne jamais a egaler
en importance celle de Persoon ou de Fries car ces deux etaient les
pionniers, et se consacrerent a 1'etude et a la publication system-
atiques. Mais Bresadola a appris a connaitre les champignons d'Eu-
rope je crois, peut-etre meme mieux que Persoon ou Fries, surtout les
sections difficiles telles que les Polyporoides resupines et les Thele-
phorees resupines. II est regrettable, a mon avis, qu'apres avoir
depense tant d'energie a 1'etude de ces sujets, il n'ait rien publie qui
nous donne, de facon systematique, le resultat de ses travaux. Ses
ouvrages ont, pour la plupart, traite de "nouvelles especes" et, comme
mes lecteurs anglais le savent bien, je considere que les nouvelles
especes n'ont pas a moitie autant d'importance (sauf toutefois pour
1'auteur) que les " vieilles especes," ni d'interet non plus.

Je crois que le monde mycologique en general n'apprecie pas
1'etendue du travail accompli par Bresadola concernant les champig-
nons europeens. Si vous visitez les collections de Leyde, de Berlin,
d' Upsala vous trouverez que Bresadola a etudie et redige des notes
critiquant toutes ces collections et il est le seul qui ait fait pareille
chose. De plus, Bresadola a exerce une grande influence en deter-
minant les specimens d'un nombre considerable de correspondants.
Je lui ai envoye des centaines de specimens et ma premiere idee
nette de beaucoup d'especes a etc tiree de ses determinations. C'est
un homme d'esprit large en ce qui concerne la demarcation des
especes et il fut parmi les premiers a demontrer la distribution
etendue d'une meme espece. II a signale un grand nombre d'especes
existant en Europe qui etaient jadis considerees comme ne se trouvant
qu'en Amerique.1

Je ne suis pas d'ailleurs, seul a avoir soumis mes specimens
a Bresadola pour leur determination. II a une nomenclature
speciale et je la connais si bien que je reconnais de suite une nomina-
tion faite par Bresadola lorsque je recois de correspondants des speci-
mens qu'il a determines. Je pourrais citer une demi-douzaine de cor-
respondants qui, a mon su, ont fait ainsi nommer leurs echantillons.
A vrai dire, on a vu se developper en Europe une sorte d'ecole

1 Polystictus biformis, Polystictus pergamenus, Trametes sepium, Hydnum Himantia, etc.
462

Bresadola de mycologues, qui comptent parmi leur nombre, les tra-
vailleurs les plus actifs en Europe actuellement. Je pourrai citer:
von Hb'hnel en Autriche, Bubak en Boheme, Torrend au Portugal,
Jaap en Allemagne, Rick au Brezil, Bourdot en France, Breitung en
Danemark (et moi-meme), dont tons les ouvrages et les especes por-
tent 1'empreinte de 1'influence de Bresadola.

Son influence a ete encore plus importante en Amerique. Je me
pique d'avoir ete le premier a decouvrir Bresadola en Amerique (cf.
Myc. Notes, 1899), la connaissance m'en vint par une remarque faite
'en passant' par le Professeur Ellis dans une lettre. Je crois qu'Ellis
ne lui envoya jamais beaucoup de specimens, mais je voulus essayer
la chose, et je lui en envoyai quelques uns comme tentative. Je fus
si frappe de ses reponses que je lui envoyai presque toutes les especes
que je trouvai a Cincinnati. Ce qui me fit le plus d'eifet dans ma
correspondance passee avec Bresadola, c'est qu'il fut le premier a me
dire que je lui avais envoye des especes "qui me sont inconues."
Tous les autres auxquels j 'avais envoye des specimens me faisaient
connaitre leur determination, ou me disaient que c'etait " une nou-
velle espece." Je commencai a me mefier des "nouvelles especes"
de bonne heure, d'autant plus que j'en trouvais (on me le dit) beau-
coup a Cincinnati. Heureusement je ne les publiai jamais, mais je
crois que je pourrais nommer un Americain qui a envoye a Bresadola
de nombreux specimens et qui a public comme "especes nouvelles"
ceux dont Bresadola lui disait "inconnues pour moi," — et cela sans
un mot de reconnaissance.

M. Murrill, notre archeologue Americain commenca un peu tard
a apprendre 1'existence de Bresadola. Dans ses premieres communi-
cations il n'etait pas d'accord avec Bresadola pour un grand nombre
de cas. Dans le cours de son deuxieme voyage en Europe il visita
Bresadola et dans ses communications finales il a copie presque tous
les synonymes de Bresadola (aussi sans le reconnaitre). Je ne crois
pas qu'il eut pu imiter une meilleure autorite, — mais je suis dispose
a etre sceptique en ce qui concerne quelques unes des conclusions de
Bresadola, surtout lorsqu'il puise dans les vagues ecrits du passe.
Cependant je suis par nature incredule comme Saint Thomas.

Je suis heureux de pouvoir presenter a mes lecteurs une photo-
graphic de Bresadola tel qu'il est aujourd'hui. L,e portrait que j'ai
public il y a quelques annees fut pris, evidemment, lors qu'il etait
jeune. Nous ne sommes pas aussi interesses a connaitre sa physi-
onomie dans ces jours d'antan, quand il etait associe avec Quelet et
Schulzer. Nous 1'aimons bien mieux dans ces annees actuelles.
Bresadola court maintenant dans sa soixante-deuxieme annee. Pen-
dant cette derniere saison, il etait en fort mauvais etat de sante mais
on m'assure qu'il est maintenant entierement remis.

Nous doutons qu'il y ait un autre mycologue aussi universelle-
ment et aussi favorablement connu, et mes lecteurs seront heureux,
je suis sur (comme moi), d'avoir un portrait recent de lui.

463

THE POLYPORES OF PERSOON'S HERBARIUM.

Having on two occasions recently visited Leiden for the purpose
of studying Persoon's herbarium, I deem it of interest to give a short
account ot the historic specimens preserved there. I think it is
probable at the coming' Congress at Brussels, Persoon may be taken
as the "starting point" for the nomenclature of fungi. While I,
personally, attach no importance whatever to the findings of this
Congress, and think it is absolutely impracticable to make "rules"
for nomenclature and a pure waste of energy, others may not think
as I do.3 In the event that Persoon is made the "legal" starting
point, then his herbarium will become the Mecca for all priority
hunters. A short account therefore will not be amiss.

In the first place I wish to acknowledge my obligations to Dr.
Goethart for every kindness and facility in working in the herbarium,
and to Dr. Jongmans for valuable aid.

Considering the difficulties that surrounded Persoon in his work,
he made a wonderful collection, but like the herbarium of Fries it is
largely made up of specimens that were sent to him by his corre-
spondents. Persoon's herbarium is chiefly deficient in the plants he
knew best, the plants of his own collection, but the specimens he
received and cited in his works are mostly preserved. The greater part
of the collection — that is, the smaller specimens which were mounted
on sheets — are practically complete and intact to-day, just as when
Persoon left them. The larger specimens were kept for many years
loosely in drawers, and some of them have disappeared or have been
eaten by insects, and from others the labels have been shifted or lost.
While they may have lost some of their historic value from this cause,
it is not serious and I think very little confusion has occurred that can
not be corrected. In recent years Dr. Jongmans has poisoned all of
these specimens and placed each in a glass covered box with the label
found with it so that no future deterioration or confusion can take
place. Quite a number of Persoon's specimens are absolutely
authentic, and are types in the strictest meaning of the word. Per-
soon has endorsed them with the name and added "Synop. fung." or
" Mycol. Burop.", showing they were the identical specimens on
which he based his descriptions. Figure 331 is a reproduction of
such labels. Others (and there are a great many such) are deter-
mined with a ? mark, especially those he received from his corre-
spondents. Some species are only represented by specimens marked
? by Persoon. Hence for these there are really no historic specimens
in the collection. I rather admire the candor that Persoon must
have manifested with his correspondents to so mark and probably so
report their specimens sent for determination. It takes a great deal
of moral courage for a man looked upon as the highest authority, as

2 " Coming " at the time this is written. It will probably be past before this is printed.

3 I am firmly convinced that in the immediate past " rules " in botany have been princi-
pally blinds for the name jugglers, and I anticipate that in however good faith the Brussels'
rules may be formulated, that will be the principal use to which they will be put.

464

Persoon was in his day, to express any doubt as to his knowledge ot
his subject.

I think there have been three men in Europe who have made a
serious study of the European Polyporoids in general, viz: Persoon,
Fries and Bresadola. I do not mean to say there have been only
these, for there have been others, but these are the three who have
published most on the subject in general. In my account of the
specimens in Persoon's herbarium, I have in many cases added notes
made in Fries' herbarium, or learned from my correspondence with
Bresadola.

Fig. 331.

Labels from Persoon's herbarium.

The following species, most of which are well known to-day and
well known to Persoon, are not represented by specimens in his
herbarium. I include here the species with which, from his writings,
he was familiar in the woods but of which he did not preserve speci-
mens. If our lawmakers decree that species are not valid unless
preserved by Persoon (as Professor Durand argues in the case of
Geoglossum viscosum), then if we obey the laws we must give up
some very familiar species. The following is the list :

Leptocephalus, nummularius, umbellatus, giganteus, imbricatus, cristatus,
spumeus, candidus, triqueter, croceus, destructor, mollis, caesius, stypticus,
crispus, officinalis, levis, fraxineus, dryadeus, marginatus, pinicola, tristis, vitreus,
holoporus, xylostromeus, brumalis, fuligineus, melanopus.

465

The following species are represented by specimens in good condi-
tion, and I presume, therefore, there will be no "law" made to prevent
our using the names. I have arranged them alphabetically under the
generic names usually employed in modern books, viz: Polyporus,
Polystictus, Fomes, Trametes and Poria. Persoon, as is well known,
did not use these names (except Poria and Polyporus) but he antici-
pated them all except Trametes, and Fries, who brought them into
use, merely followed the lines laid down by Persoon.

Fig. 332.

Polyporus Pes Caprae. (From Persoon's herbarium.

POLYPORUS.

adustus — Specimen poor but evident.

aureolus— This is amorphus as now known. Arnorphus was a Friesian
species, but Persoon proposed to change it to aureolus, as he stated (truly) it is
no more amorphous than any other Polyporus. Fries would not accept the
change. While he had no hesitation in changing Persoon's names if they did
not suit him (example, Radulum molare), the rule did not work both ways.
"Rules" rarely do. As Fries commanded the situation, the plant has become
known as " Polyporus amorphus ".

betulinus — (Box 58) as well-known.

citrinus — as Persoon called the well-known sulphureus. Box No. 379, labeled
"cristatus? giganteus?" by Leveille, is this plant.

confluens — Not the usual form but a specimen from Chaillet, which he calls
"var. pachypus". I believe it to be a form of confluens, though I have seen only
this specimen. It is surely not a synonym for politus, as stated by Fries.

cuticularis — It appears to me that what Persoon called "triqueter" is now
known as cuticularis. It is a common plant in France and must have been
known to Persoon, who described it, I think, as triqueter. There is no specimen
in his herbarium. Persoon included cuticularis in his work solely on Bulliard's

466

figure (t. 462) which is such a poor figure that Persoon never recognized it.
However, there is a specimen in his herbarium which I would refer to cuticularis,
labeled by Persoon " Boletus cuticularis, Bull.?"

frondosus— as well known.

fumosus — (Box 65) which has dark pores and would generally be referred to
adustus. Persoon records "Odor gratus".

hispidus — (Box 40) as well known.

Juglandis — well known now as squatnosus.

laccatus — (Box 350) as Persoon called the well-known lucidus.

leucomelas — a small specimen as now known, I think.

levis — There is no specimen of levis now although there evidently was at
one time, for the label is attached to a ferruginous Poria with a second label,
" medulla panis affinis ", the latter evidently the correct one. Levis was a pileate
species, "passim ad Salices", and its identity, even as a tradition, has been lost
entirely.

Pes Caprae — a nice specimen (Fig. 332) from Mougeot. Persoon described
it as "vert-jaunatre".

radiatus — Persoon evidently took radiatus from Fries' work. What is known
as radiatus to-day, Persoon called ''triqueter var. alneus ". There are, however,
two very poor specimens in the herbarium labeled "radiatus." Both are very
poor and doubtful, and I think neither is radiatus.

Fig. 333.

Polyporus Rheades. 'From Persoon's herbarium.

RHEADES. (Fig. XXX.) — Ce sont des specimens excessivement int£res-
sants car 1'espece d'e Persoon fut entierement mal interpreted par Fries. Rheades
est la plante identique qui fut appelee vulpinus par Fries; c'est une espece rare
mais fortement marquee poussant sur le peuplier. Persoon ne rencontra jamais
la plante lui-meme, mais il en recut deux bons specimens de Tussac. Ils sont
en bon etat (dans la boite 4) sauf que les spies recouvrant le pileus sont usees.
Fries a classe le Rheades parmi less Spongiosi, section i laquelle il n'appartient

467

pas. Cette id6e lui fut suggeree par un dessin que lui envoya Quelet, sous le
nom de fulvus; Fries biffa ce nom et ecrivit a la place celui de Rheades. Telle
peut avoir ete la source des idees qu'avait autrefois Bresadola lorsqu'il presenta
(Fungi Tridentini T. 136) sous le nom de Rheades une plante qui a depuis et6
appelee Tamaricis. Bresadola a corrige cette opinion depuis lors.

rutilans — as well known, and as well illustrated by Persoon. It is the same
as Fries called nidulans.

tuberaster — I doubt very much if the specimen in Persoon's herbarium
which he cites, Thomas, Calabria, is the same as Jacquin's illustration on which
Persoon based the name. In such cases I hope our lawmakers will not fail to
legislate as to which we will have to accept.

varius — (Box 394) as well known.

viscosus— The type "Pontivy, France, Cauvin" is in good condition. It is a
Boletus (mitis, teste Bresadola) not a Polyporus.

POLYSTICTUS.

abietinus — as well known.

argyraceus — The specimen from Chaillet on which Persoon based this species
is glued top down and I could not get much idea from the pore surface. It may
be an "exolete versicolor" as Fries refers it.

cinnabarinus — Three specimens as now well known. It is rather rare in
Europe.

dolosus — surely the same as abietinus and from Persoon's remarks and labels
it is evident he was somewhat of that opinion himself.

Fig. 334.

Polystictus lutescens. 'From Persoon's herbarium.)

IvUTESCENS. (Fig. 334)—-!! y a un bon specimen dans 1'herbier de Per-
soon et c'est une forme "fauve" de Polystictus hirsutus. II y a un grand nombre
de Polypores qui prennent des formes colorees, g£neralement fauve et brun, et
on a bas6 un grand nombre "d'especes" sur ces formes fauves. Ces formes de
couleurs correspondent pour les Polypores aux blonds et bruns de la race
humaine, et les "fauves" sont d'un type plus meridional. Je crois que le Poly-
stictus lutesceus est plus commun dans le sud de 1'Europe et il est parfois d6-
terming comme Polystictus velutinus. Bresadola a d6clar6 dans ses ecrits que le
lutescens de Persoon est le meme que le Trametes hispida. Nul ne connait

468

mieux que Bresadola la difference entre ces deux especes et il admettra certaine-
ment 1'erreur en voyant notre photographic (Fig. 334) du type Persoon.

Lorsque Bresadola s'adressa a la direction du mus£e de Leiden pour obtenir
des specimens, le directeur, dont j'ignore le nom, etait d'esprit fort circonspect.
II preleva de petits fragments qu'il envoya a Bresadola; on voit nettement sur
notre photographic du Polystictus lutescens 1'endroit pu on coupa ce fragment.
Comment il fut possible pour Bresadola, avec un specimen si minuscule, de de-
finir quoique ce soit, me surpasse, mais je crois que cela explique son erreur au
sujet de la plante en question. Le Polystictus lutescens n'est pas un synonyme
de Trametes hispida, ainsi qu'on 1'a dit, mais plutot une forme coloriee de Poly-
stictus hirsutus.

perennis — (Boxes 195 and 199.) as well known.

versicolor — (Boxes 138, 348 and others.) Persoon knew versicolor as it is
known to-day, excepting that he included zonatus in it.

FOMES.

conchatus — as known to-day.

Euonymi — (Box 354.) There is a good collection under the name " Polyporus
scoriatus," which is an unpublished name of Persoon. It is practically the same
thing as Fomes ribis, as pointed out by Bresadola, and excepting the host, they
are very close. I think there is a little difference, however.

fomentarius — (Boxes 415 and 417.) There are two large specimens, both attrib-
uted to Persoon, though neither labeled by him. They are both correct, however,
and the common form on beech in France.

fomentarius var. applanatus — (Box 393.) There is a good specimen labeled
by Persoon as above. It is a very common species now known as Fomes appla-
natus, for it is no variety of fomentarius, as Persoon thought.

IGNIARIUS.— (Boite 387.) Voila un bon specimen, et c'est bien la meme
plante que celle qui fut connue de Fries comrne igniarius. Je crois que la plupart
des mycologues francais sont dans 1' erreur en ce qui concerne la plante qu'ils
appellent igniarius. L'iguiarius fut un nom propose par Linnee et on ecrit
souvent son notn a la suite d'igniarius. Si sa signification doit etre interpretee
dans le sens de Linnee, je n'ai rien a dire, car je ne crois pas que personne ait
jamais su ni ne sache jamais, ce que Linnee appelait igniarius; je doute meme
que Linnee 1'ait su lui meme. Persoon et Fries donnerent a 1'igniarius sa signifi-
cation et il n'y a pas de difficulte a decouvrir ce qu'ils entendaient par ce mot.
Ainsi que le declare Fries, c'est une plaute tres commune sur les saules en
Suede et ineme en France. La couleur du contexte est d'un brun ombre et la
plupart des mycologues francais appellent cette plante Fomes nigricans.

Ce que les mycologues francais appellent igniarius est une toute autre plante
qui pousse sur le Quercus. Son contexte est d'une couleur beaucoup plus claire,
se rapprochant de la couleur rhubarbe. yuoique cette plante pousse en Suede
et en France, ni Fries ni Persoon ne 1'ont jamais distinguee. Ce fut Karsten
(a ce que me dit Mr. Romell) qui en nota les differences d'avec 1'igniarius et
1'appela Fomes robustus. Je crois qu'il n'y a pas de Fomes nigricans dans le
sens de 1'Hym. Europe de Fries car il confond deux choses. Le specimen qu'il
cite "Scotia Klotzsch" se trouve dans le musee de Berlin (section d'exposition).
C'est une forme noire de fomentarius et ce fut 1'idee primitive sans doute de
Fomes nigricans " ad truncos Betulae, nee alibi." "Bull. A 401 hunc satis refert."
Je crois que Bresadola possede bien le Fomes nigricans dans sa signification
primitive, et que les mycologues francais se trompent a ce sujet.

loricatus var. glaucopus — (Box 179). A specimen from Chaillet which was
all known to Persoon. The same collection is found in Fries' herbarium. It
was referred by Fries to igniarius. In my opinion it is salicinus.

POMACEUS — (Boites 105 et 170). Persoon avait des idees bien arretees au
sujet des pomaceus et il en fit un rapport bien determine dans ses ecrits et ses
specimens. Je crois que son nom devrait etre employe. Fries considere le
pomaceus comme une variete d'igniarius; cela s'en rapproche certainment, la
couleur du coutexte est la menie, les spores sont pareils, mais il y a sur 1'hyme-

469

nium du pomaceus un grand nombre de setae colores qui ne paraissent pas — ou
du moins je ne les ai jamais constates— sur 1'igniarius. Recement Bresadola fut
le premier a indiquer les points de divergence entre cette plante et 1'igniarius,
mais il 1'appela fulvus de Scopoli.

Je crois que le rapport de Scopoli est trop vague et le fait que Quelet,
Marcucci, Bresadola, Fries et Hartig ont chacun pu croire qu'il reconnaissait le
fulvus de Scopoli dans une plante tout a fait differente, doit venir a 1'appui de
mon opinion.

ribesius. (Box 288 and 286.) — as well known now as Pomes ribis.

TORULOSUS. (Boites 62, 183, 207, 409.)— Ce sont les plantes les plus inter-
essantes de la collection Persoon, car toute trace des recherches faites par lui a
leur sujet a disparu des traditions memes de la mycologie europeenne. On ren-
contre frequemment ce Pomes sur le chene aux alentours de Paris et il etait
bien connu de Persoon ainsi que des mycologistes actuels en France. Persoon
1'appela torulosus a cause du bord obtus et enfle qui en est souvent un caracter-
istique saillant. II parle de la figure "A 454 var. c" de Bulliard qui est bien
dessinee mais mal coloriee ; il parle aussi de la fig. A 80 de Bolton qui n'a que
peu de ressemblance avec cette plante.4 II en parle familierement dans ses
"Champignons comestibles" de la facon suivante : "un champignon qui croit au
pied des chenes, large, aplati, et brunatre, ayant sur la superficie des protuberan-
ces souvent diffbrmes, mais point de cercles." II a conserve dans son herbier
quatre beaux specimens de grande taille et tres caracteristiques (boites 62, 183,
207 et 409.) Malgre tout cela, Quelet decouvrit que c'etait une "espece nouvelle"
et 1'appela Fomes rubriporus. Le mot "nouvelle" parait n'avoir etc employe
par Quelet que dans le sens mycologique. Cela voulait dire "espece nouvelle
pour Quelet." L'annee qui suivit sa publication par Quelet, Boudier le publia
aussi comme Fomes fusco-purpureus et quoique la publication de Quelet ait etc
anterieure a la sienne, Boudier a toujours employe sa propre denomination et
tout recemment il a presente une de ses belles illustrations sous ce nom. Ceci
peut paraitre etrange a premiere idee, mais je crois qu'il avait de bonnes raisons
pour agir ainsi. Boudier fut le premier a trouver la plante et il 1'envoya a Quelet
en la denommant fusco-purpureus, mais avant qu'il ait pu la presenter publique-
ment, Quelet 1'emit sous son propre nom. Le precede etait peu delicat pour ne
pas dire un mot plus severe. Je pen$e qu'en cas pareil Boudier sent, comme moi,
que tout en respectant dument " 1'anteriorite " nous prefererions que cette loi
soit observee avec plus de bonne foi. Cooke qui n'eut jamais grande sympathie
pour Quelet (et je crois que le sentiment etait reciproque) employa la denomin-
ation de Boudier, ajoutant simplement celle de Quelet comme synonyme. Sac-
cardo qui suivit la methode d' arrangement (ou de derangement) de Cooke pour
les Polypores, fit de me'me.

TRAMETES.

cervinus. — There is a good specimen in Persoon's herbarium and it is the
same plant now known as Trametes mollis and was so referred by Fries. Per-
soon's plant has a distinct, reflexed border, as it has in southern and central
Europe, but in Sweden I have never found this border well developed. It will
be noted that Fries puts it in the resupinate section. I shall use Persoon's spe-
cific name as it well designates the color, and the plant is never "mollis" in any
sense of the word. Besides as Fries changed many of Persoon's names on the
grounds of "priority" I think he should have adopted some of them on the same
grounds.

odoratus.— (Box 14) as now well known.

odoratus var. ceratophora. — (Boxes 389 and 401) an abnormal subterranean
form.

pini. — (Boxes 39 and 234) as now well known,
suaveolens. — (Box 66) as now well known.

4 Quoique le Fomes torulosus soit frequent autour de Paris et tres repandu sur le conti-
nent, 011 ii'en a jamais fait mention en Angleterre, oft il se rencontre sans doute aussi.

470

PORIA.

Comme tous les champignons a resupin le genre Poria n'a ete que peu £tudie
en Europe et je crois que la plus grande proportion des anciens specimens que
Ton voit dans les muse'es sont maldetermines ; il est certain qu'on ne peut en dire
grand'chose. Bresadola fut le premier a £tudier s£rieusement ces plantes, si 1'on
excepte les premiers temps de Fries a Femsjo. Fries contribua beaucoup a leur
confusion ; et on constate dans ses collections et Icones des contradictions di-
rectes en ce qui concerne ces specimens; ceci a ete prouv6 par Bresadola. Tandis
que Fries observait et etudiait soigneusement ces specimens durant sa jeunesse
a Femsjo, toute son attention et tous ses efforts furent consacres pendant ses
quarante dernieres anne'es & 1'etude des agarics, si bien que les details concernant
les Porias et autres champignons a resupin sont assez confus dans ses derniers
ecrits. Je crois que ses dispositions des especes de Persoon furent presque toutes
erronees ; il n'avait d'ailleurs aucun moyen de connaitre les 6chantillons de
Persoon.

Quant a Persoon, ses idees n'etaient claires en ce qui concerne les Porias que
pour un bien petit nombre d'especes. Ceci ressort de son herbier ou on voit des
uoms manuscrits sous un grand nombre de Porias, sans compter beaucoup de
specimens qu'il a marques d'un point d'interrogation. De plus, unequantite des
noins de sa Mycologia Europaea sont tires de Hoffmann et £taient primitivement
bases sur des croissances anormales trouvees dans less mines et les caves. Sur
les dix-sept specimens incontestablement authentiques qui figurent dans son
herbier, six settlement furent recueillis par lui personnellement. Les autres sont
des noms donnes par lui a des echantillons qui lui furent envoyees et qu'il ne con-
naissait pas. Je ne sais si Persoon fut le premier a se tirer d'embarras en bapti-
sant du nom d' "especes uouvelles" tous les echantillons qui lui 6taient inconnus ;
je suis bien persuade qu'il ne fut pas le dernier a employer cette methode !

bibula. — Persoon made but one collection. It is white and has large,
angular pores and may prove to be the same as ambigua. I found no cystidia
on it however that occur on ambigua.

brunnea. — Only one little fragment from Chaillet on which the species was
based. It is too scanty to tell much. The color was probably reddish as Persoon
first referred it to " rufus."

byssina. — It is evident that Persoon referred several things to byssina,
among others a specimen from Chaillet which Persoon also called "molluscus,"
showing that he had no very definite idea as to the latter species.

colliculosa. — There is a good specimen in Persoon's herbarium. It was on
oak, is white and has large, rigid pores, about what Fries called Trametes ser-
pens, I think.

contigua.— It will be noted that Persoon (Myc. Europ., p. 74) placed conti-
gua in the pileate section, but it is usually held to be a Poria nowadays, and
Persoon's type is resupinate. It is in good condition and is very close to the
common plant in Sweden that Fries called Poria ferruginosa. Both have fer-
ruginous context and abundant colored setae on the hymenium. I found no
spores in Persoon's specimen. I think that ferruginosa and contigua are not
exactly the same plant, but I have no clear idea as to the difference between them.

cribosa. — This was based on one specimen from Helvetia still in Persoon's
herbarium. It belongs to the ferruginous section with abundant colored setae
and small superficial pores. I doubt if it is well developed.

cruenta. — Only one collection which is same general color, only much
darker as shown on Persoon's plate (t. 16 fig. 4). Strange as it may seem, I be-
lieve it is the same plant as shown Rostk. t. 58 which is orange when fresh and
changes to the color as shown by Persoon in drying. This plant is now called
by Rev. Bresadola (I am sure in error) Poria nitida, Pers.

clentipora.— Only the type, all that was known to Persoon. It has a thick
subiculum and superficial, lacerate pores. Persoon described it as " subnitidus."

ferrea.— I think ferrea and Racodioides are the same thing. Color pale
ferruginous with a spongy, sterile margin. Pores rather large (not minute, as
Persoon says for ferrea). Colored setae abundant. Spores I did not find.
Though I do not know the species, I think it can be identified from Persoon's
specimens.

471

fimbriata.— This is Porothelium fimbriatum as now well known.

frustulata — A very poor specimen from Chaillet. I do not know it, but it
surely has no relation to salicinus as Persoon suggests.

fugax — The type is there, a piece of wood, and under a lens I think I can
see a faint indication of a fungus on it. If the species can not be recognized
from Persoon's Icones Pictae T. 16, f. 2, it will never be known in the sense of
Persoon.

fusco-carnea — Persoon only found this once, near Paris, on dead branches.
It is unknown to me, but the specimens are very poor.

incarnata — The type is in good condition. It is a thick slab about 6 mm.
thick, with long pores and thin subiculum. Persoon says white within and
Fries suggests it was a "lusus". It has no resemblance to Fries' Icones of
incarnata, but it may be his Poria placenta.

incrustans— This was Persoon's change of pbliqua of Fries. It is needless
to say that Fries never accepted it. There is only a small fragment from
Sweden.

laurens — The type from Chaillet is in the collection as figured (poorly) Myc.
Europ. T. XVII, fig. 2, not fig. 3, as cited by error. It is resupinate, Polyporus
amorphus.

Medulla panis — In the Persoonian sense this is quite evidently a frequent
species " assez vulgaire ", " sur des bois travailles ". There are seven collections
in his herbarium. It is a thick, white, firm species on the Trametes order, with
small, round, firm pores. Medulla panis was based on an old Jacquin picture
which each person interprets differently, and it is said that Persoon, Fries and
the Danish botanists each take a different plant under this name.

megalopora — Persoon named two collections, one from Mougeot, the other
from Desmazieres, not the same I think and neither normal.

mollusca — The type is in good condition and seems to me the same as
mucida. The type was not sent to Bresadola, but a specimen that Persoon had
marked "Poria spongiosa, Poria mollusca?" I think, notwithstanding, that
Poria mollusca will have to be taken in the sense of Bresadola, who gave the
first account of it that can be recognized. In the woods of Sweden I was never
able to tell mollusca from vulgaris without the microscope, for excepting the
spore characters they are much alike. I doubt if either Persoon or Fries,
neither of whom used the microscope on Poria spores, could tell the two apart.

mucida — This is a white species with large pores and a soft white border.

1 do not know it with certainty, but I doubt if it is the plant now so called.

NITIDA. — Ce fut, je crois, le Rev. Bresadola qui observa tout d'abord les
caracteres microscopiques de cette espece, sous le nom d'eupora de Karsten.
(Karsten etait si occupe a chercher de nouvelles especes qu'il n'avait pas toujours
le temps d'en etudier les caracteres au microscope.) Cette espece presente une
tres curieuse cystidia, de grande taille, sur l'hymenium. Ce fut Bresadola qui me
fit connaitre cette plante et je reconnus 1'espece de Persoon des que je la vis. I/a
grande cystidia si abondante sur l'hymenium, facilement distinguee sous le
microscope confirma entieretnent cette opinion des le debut. Ce type de nitida
ne fut pas envoye a Bresadola et sa conclusion, tiree sans doute de 1'illustration
de Persoon, est erronee. J'indiquerai la genealogie de Poria nitida par le langage
symbolique habituellement employe, ainsi qu'il suit : Poria nitida Pers. Obs. Myc.

2 p. 15 (non Fries, non Bresadola): Poria Blyttii Fries, Hym. Europe p. 571 p. p.
(non Bresadola)5: Poria eupora Karst. Not. Soc. Fenn IX p. 360.

Racodioides — see ferrea.

radula — I believe this to be the same as versipora.
salicina — as»now well known.

scalaris — There is only one collection (ex Gay). I think it is the resupinate
form of Trametes serialis, the same as Fries called Poria callosa.

5 On trouve dans 1'herbier de Fries deux plantes cliff ^rentes remises par Blytt et denom-
mees : Poria Blyttii. I^es deux pr£sentent ces cystidia particulieres. uiais cela n'est ft mon avis
qu'une coincidence. Bresadola les considere comme des varieles d'nne meme espece. Celle
qui pousse sur bois ac£rm£ est rare, je ne 1'ai jamais rencoiitr^e et Mr. Romell ne 1'a trouvee
qu'une seule fois; celle qui pousse sur les bois feuillus est beaucoup plus commune. C'est
manifestement cette derniere " avec bord pale " que Fries d&rit sous le nom de Poria Blyttii,
et c'est celle-ia aussi que Persoon appelle Poria nitida, tandis que Karsten la deiiomme :
Poria eupora.

472

TAXICOLA. — Persoon ne connaissait qu'un petit specimen venantde Chaillet.
Ce specimen est noir comme du charbon maintenant et dans la figure de Persoon
il est noir aussi, mais le subiculum reste blanc. Chaillet 1'appelle sur 1'etiquetet
" Sistotrema Taxi " et dit "la couleur n'a pas chang6 ". L,a couleur avait change,
mais ni Persoon ni Chaillet ne le savaient, car lorsque la plante est fraiche elle
est rouge. On pourrait ecrire un long chapitre au sujet des erreurs dans les
determinations de cette plante. Elle existe en abondance dans les musees et
sous toute espece de noms. Je 1'ai vue etiquettee: Merulius petropolitanus,
Merulius molluscus, Merulius rufus, Merulius serpens, Merulius Rayenelii, Poria
violacea, Poria purpurea, Poria incarnata, Poria rufa et Poria sorbicola, et ayec
une seule exception, tous se referaient a Fries. Je crois que ni Persoon ni Fries
ne connurent reellement cette plante. Persoon ne vit jamais que ce petit frag-
ment decolore que lui remit Chaillet, et il lie 1'aurait jamais reconnu s'il 1'avait
vu en vie. Fries lui donna deux ou trois noms differents, mais certes il ne lui
donna pas autant de noms qu'on a bien voulu le dire. Je crois que Bresadola fut
le premier a avoir une connaissance distincte de cette plante et malheureusement
il basa ce nom sur le specimen qui parait dans 1'herbier de Persoon. II serait
difficile de trouver un plus mauvais nom, surtout si on ecrit " Persoon " a sa
suite. Persoon ne connut jamais la plante et nul ne peut jamais avoir eu le
moindre soupcon sur son identite d'apres les ecrits ou les figures de Persoon.
Elle pousse sur le Pinus sylvestris (toujours, as ce que nous savons) et non
settlement elle n'est pas "taxicola" mais on n'a pas de preuve qu'elle ait jamais
pousse sur le Taxus. Je ne connais pas d'autre nom certain qui puisse lui etre
applique (sauf sorbicola qui est aussi mauvais que taxicola). Je crois que c'est la
violacea des derniers ecrits de Fries et 1'incarnata de ses premiers ecrits ce n'est
pas certain et tous deux sont des noms insuffisants. Je voudrais bien que nos
legislateurs donne 1'autorite a quelqu'un de decouvrir que c'est une " espece
nouvelle" et de lui trouver un nom approprie.

versipora — Many specimens of many "forms". There is no doubt that it is
that common species around Paris with sinuate Pores inclined to become irpicoid
if growing in an upright position. Persoon gave a different varietal name to
almost every collection. It is Poria radula in the sense of Bresadola, and prob-
ably also of Fries. It is the common plant in England, known to Berkeley as
vaporaria. Berkeley passed this over to us in America, and Ellis always called
all large, white-pored Porias "vaporaria." It is not vaporaria in the sense of
Fries.

umbrina — There are two collections, one from D. Graves, the other from
Chaubert. Both surely the same and on elm, and I think a distinct species not
otherwise known to me. It belongs to the ferruginous section and has abundant
colored setae. The specimen from Desmazieres in Fries' herbarium is his own
laevigata, as pointed out by Bresadola, quite a different species I think.

undata — Only one specimen from Chaillet. It is the resupinate form of
what was distributed by Rabenhorst as Polyporus Broomei. It was found
abundantly, and fine pileate forms were found in the botanical garden at Berlin
by Dr. Hennings. It is supposed to be an exotic species.

unita — Persoon evidently based this on a single collection from Mougeot.
It may be resupinate igniarius. I am quite sure it was never white, and could
not be medulla panis as stated. Nor is it the same as the specimen in Fries'
herbarium.

Mon francais— Mes articles f rancais paraissent en francais dans mes brochures
mais je ne voudrais pas que mes lecteurs croient que je les ecris en cette langue.
Us sont traduits de 1'anglais par une personne qui connait parfaitement le
francais et 1'anglais mais qui n'est pas mycologue, et par consequent elle pourra
se tromper pour les termes techniques.

Quant a mon francais, je le lis aussi facilement que 1'anglais; je le parle
imparfaitement et je ne 1'ecris pas du tout.

473

Geaster Dybowski.

Monsieur Patouillard a aimablement attire mon attention sur
cette plante; il dit que j'ai fait erreur de reference en ce qui la con-
cerne, dans mon Synopsis des Geaster (Myc. Notes p. 316^. En
examinant de nouveau la plante j'admets volontiers qu'elle differe de

Fig. 335.
Geaster Dybowski, natural size ; ali

uouth enlarged (X6.)

tous les autres Geaster epiges en ce qu'elle a une bouche striee, fait
que je n'avais pas observe" dans mon examen precedent. Je dois
encore la considerer comme etant tres proche du Geaster velutinus
dans lequel je 1'avais plac£e.

L,es Geaster, a bouche striee ou non-striee, sont en general des
plantes fort differentes, et dans mon premier travail sur les Geasters,
je basai sur ce fait la division primaire du genre. Nous ne pouvons

474

grouper des plantes d'apres un seul caractere car il y a toujours des
exceptions ou une plante presentera un des caracteres qui sont le
trait principal de certains groupes, tandis que dans ses autres carac-
teristiques elle se rapprochera davantage d'autres groupes. C'est
1'ensemble des caracteres qui fait nos especes aussi bien que nos
groupes.

Le Geaster Dybowski correspond en tous points au Geaster velu-
tinus dans ses traits essentiels, c'est a dire sa nature epigee, la surface
de son peridium, sa forte columelle.

Je ne puis croire qu'un des specimens d'une meme recolte a
bouche striee suffisant pour faire une espece distincte, car j'ai vu des
benches striees et non-striees dans la meme recolte d'une seule espece.
Que ce soit la cependant une difference qui nierite un nom special, je
1'admets volontiers et je considere le Geaster Dybowski comme une
forme a bouche striee du Geaster velutinus. Nous avons un autre
cas, exactement semblable dans les Geaster: le Geaster MacOwani
(Myc. Notes p. 311, t. 97) que je considere comme etant une forme
a bouche striee du Geaster fornicatus, espece qui, dans toutes les
parties du nionde a une bouche reguliere sauf dans cette forme sud-
africaine.

A REEXAMINATION NEEDED.

"It now seems doubtful if the Schweinitz specimen is the true Hydnuin
strigosutn, Sw. but a reexamination of the plant would be necessary to settle the
question." — Banker, in " Alycologia" January, 1910.

It seems to me important that Mr. Banker should reexamine it
at an early date, as on his first examination he included it in a " new
genus" of Hydnaceae, and the plant in Schweinitz's herbarium is
a Polyporus with but little resemblance to a Hydnuni, and no
more resemblance to Hydnum strigosum than it has to a porcupine.
Mr. Banker has probably noticed the passing note in my letter No. 24,
on this subject, and has elaborated at great length with another new
juggle.

I hope when Mr. Banker reexamines Schweinitz's specimen he
will be impressed, as I was when I examined it, with the folly of any
one presuming to change Fries' names of Hydnums and at the same
time not distinguishing a Hydnum from a Polyporus when he sees it.

Now that Mr. Banker has made his little " correction " wre await
with interest another little "correction" from the editor of the
N. A. F. The plant is a Polyporus, very closely related to Polyporus
hispidus, but as far as I know a remarkably distinct "new species."
The editor of the N. A. F.,who has examined Schweinitz's herbarium
several times, never recognized it as a Polyporus, possibly because
it was labeled " Hydnum." Professor McGinty calls it Inonotus
Bankeri, in recognition of the valuable work done by Mr. Banker on
the subject, and furnishes the following pedigree and description :
Inonotus Bankeri, McGinty, sp. nov.

Hydnum strigosum, Schweinitz (not Swartz.)

Steccherinum strigosum ;Swartz. Banker, Mem. Torrey Club, 1906: 128.

475

Pileus thick, sessile, compact, dimidiate. Surface densely covered with
coarse, strigose hairs. Context bright, ferruginous, soft, spongy. Pores con-
colorous, large, sinuate, irregular/becoming lacerate when old. Spores abundant,
elliptical, smooth, 9x11 mic., deep ferruginous color.

I trust when the little "correction" is made in the North Amer-
ican Flora, due notice will be taken of the priority of Professor
McGinty's name.

RESUME OF PHALLOIDS RECENTLY RECEIVED FROM
CORRESPONDENTS.

USSHER, C. B., Straits Settlements:

Phallus multicolor, photograph, color sketch and specimen.

LAING, H. W., New Zealand:

Clathrus cibarius, fine photograph recently published in Mycolog-
ical Notes. It is the first we have received of this species.

KUSANO, S., Japan:

Color sketch of Phallus rugulosus, demonstrating its identity with
Phallus gracilis.

Pseudocolus Javanicus, color sketch and notes on its occurrence in
Formosa.

O'CONNOR, CHAS., Mauritius:

Simblum periphragmoides. Alcoholic specimen and sketch, showing
that shape has little value in deciding species in the "yellow" Simblums,
and that Simblum Texense probably can not be maintained as distinct from
Simblum periphragmoides.

Clathrus Fischeri, alcoholic specimens and color notes, placing this
species for a time at least as distinct in its color (yellow) from Clathrus
gracilis of Australia.

FETCH, PROFESSOR T., Ceylon:

Phallus indusiatus, five fine photographs of various forms.

Lysurus Gardneri, photograph same as found on page 37 of "Synopsis
of the Known Phalloids".

Clautriavia merulina, three photographs; one with pileus removed, an-
other a section, showing the attachment of the veil which is confluent with
the top of the stipe in a manner entirely distinct from any species of
Phallus known to me.

_ NEW SPECIES.— Most of the proposers of " new species " are content to
write ''new species" after their names, and let some one else find out if the
species are new or not. A recent writer on the Philippine plants has quite an
improvement. He calls them " Brand New Species." I suspect, however, when
they are traced down they will be found to be of the same old, familiar H. & M.
variety.

476

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. LLOYD.

No. 36.
CINCINNATI, O. AUGUST, 1910.

PROFESSOR W. A. KELLERMAN.

477
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 0 1949

PROFESSOR W. A. KELLERMAN.

It was a heavy blow that fell on American mycologists at the
death of Professor Kellermau. I am afr?»id there is no one to take up
and continue his work.

His earlier years were devoted largely to the microscopic species,
and when his career was suddenly cut short he had just begun to get
a good start with our larger fungi. Professor Kellertnan was perhaps
the most energetic and enthusiastic mycologist we had. In fact, he
paid the penalty with his life in venturing into a tropical climate in
search of material for his favorite study. His death was a severe
shock to all of us, for only a few months previous he had left us in the
best of health, with hopes of rich additions to his collections.

When Professor Kellerman began the publication, or rather re-
vived the publication of the Journal of Mycology, he succeeded in
instilling new life into American mycology. It was largely a labor of
love, for I think the publication was never a success from a financial
point of view and always drew on his private resources. There are few
men so enthusiastic in their work that they are willing to make per-
sonal sacrifices in order to carry it on.

OUR LATEST LAWS " BY AUTHORITY."

I was .glad to be advised by a special correspondent at Brussels
that the recent botanical congress had adopted Fries, with a few ex-
ceptions, as a starting point for mycological nomenclature. While I
do net believe that nomenclature can be regulated by artificial law, I
am personally much gratified that the congress was wise enough to set
their disapproval on the flood of cheap date-dictionary juggling so
prevalent of late. While it will probably have little effect with this
work, as those who have indulged in it are so deep in the mire that
they can not extricate themselves, yet if they persist in this course it
puts them in the position of being open outlaws and removes the last
vestige of the excuse that the work is done under the guise of law.

I have not seen the full text of the Brussels "Laws," and do not
know if they contain any "sleepers." I am thoroughly convinced, from
what I learned in conversation 'with mycologists in Europe, that those
with whom I talked were earnest in their desire that something be done
at Brussels to prevent name juggling, but whether or not they have
succeeded is another thing. The name juggler is a natural product of
the personal advertisement system in connection with plant names.
Probably as long as one exists, so will the other, for they go hand in
hand.

Botanical congresses, like political conventions in the United
States, are governed by a system of trading, wherein a few wire-pullers
in each section direct the matter. Fortunately, from a fungus point of
view, the chief pullers in this department (Farlow and Atkinson) had
rather sane ideas and made a late date (Fries) their starting point.
However, the "starting point" in nomenclature of fungi is of about as

478

much practical importance to the student of fungi as is the exact lo-
cation of the north pole to the average tourist. Still, the later the
"legal" starting point the less possibility of "legal" juggling. There-
fore mycologists in general have reason to be thankful that Farlow and
Atkinson, as well as the others who voted in approval, made their date
no earlier. But it scarcely seems fair to our Kuntzeite friends or to
those who worship the sacred principles of priority to give them such
a hard jolt in the direction of fungi in general, and at the same time
except special departments, such as Uredinaceae and Myxomycetes,
where the door for name juggling is open back to Adam.

Taking everything together, our "law-makers" did very well, and
personally we are grateful that it was no worse.

Our botanical law-makers may be likened to a party of children at
play. It amuses them and does no permanent harm ( nor good, either,
for that matter), as botanical nomenclature is subject to the same laws
that govern any language, viz: the rules of use based on fact and evi-
dence. It is useless to try to make artificial rules to regulate the course
of natural laws.

THE GENUS THELEPORUS.

This is an unfortunate genus in more than one respect. First,
the name is too close to the well-known genus Thelephora, and sec-
ond, the genus is not of much importance, though it is carried in

Fig. 374
Theleporus cietaceus (x6).

all of our systematic works. The word "thele" means a papilla, and
the character of the genus is a papilla in each pore, otherwise the
genus is the usual genus Poria. The papillae are very small and can
scarcely be seen except when enlarged. We think, however, they can
be found in our enlarged photograph if viewed with a magnifying
glass. But one species of Theleporus is known, and but one collection,
as far as I am aware. This was from South Africa, by \Yah!berg,
and was named by Fries (Theleporus cretaceus) about sixty ycars
ago. In a few words, it is a Poria with a papilla in each pore. The
color is white ; otherwise, our figure tells the whole story.

479

FEMSJO IN FRIES' DAY.

The illustration on the opposite page represents Femsjo in the
early days of Elias Fries. It has never been published, and was made
from an oil painting in the possession of Theodore Fries at Upsala.
1 he house on the left is the house in which Elias Fries was born, and
where he lived when he did his early work with fungi. His father was
pastor of the church on the right.

Femsjo is located in southern Sweden, and seems to me to be
about on the dividing line between the southern and northern regions,
so that it embraces the flora of both. Southern Sweden is a rich, roll-
ing, agricultural country. The prevailing wood is beech. Northern
Sweden is for the most part a rocky, hilly, sterile region, with a few-
fertile spots in the valleys, but principally rocks and woods. The pre-
vailing forest trees are pine and spruce, with occasionally a few sec-
tions of frondose woods along the lakes. The region at Femsjo is a
combination of both these types. The greater part of the forests is of
acerous wood, but sandwiched in between are a few large tracts of
beech woods. Fries was therefore most fortunately situated at Femsjo
to find the fungi that occur in both woods.

From an agricultural point of view, Femsjo is a most barren re-
gion, for while the soil is very fertile (that is, what soil there is), the
rocks are far more abundant than the soil. Before a field can be pre-
pared for cultivation the rocks have to be removed, or perhaps "quar-
ried" would be a better word. The greater part of the country around
Femsjo is in a wild state even to this day, doubtless due to the labor
involved in preparing the soil for cultivation. Under these adverse
conditions of agriculture, farming means a constant struggle, and sir:h
a life develops characters of thrift and economy instead of waste, as
in more favored regions. The average American farmer would starve
to death on a farm at Femsjo, but the Swedes make good crops — of
hay, for example — on a rocky field that would not be considered worth
the labor of harvesting in our country.

Fries' father, who was a highly educated man, spent his life as
pastor of the little church that vou see in our illustration. Excepting
the time he spent in college, Elias Fries lived here during the early
years of his life, until the age of forty years, when he was offered a
professorship in the University of Upsala and removed with his family
to this city. The old church at Femsjo remains practically the same
as it was in Fries' time, with the exception of a few minor changes.
The old home has been torn down and a new pastor's residence built,
seme what farther to the left than the building in the picture. In fact.
with the exception of the church, the entire surroundings have been
so changed as to be scarcely recognizable. I am told by Theodore Fries
that this oil painting is a very accurate representation of the surround-
ings at that time, as he \vell remembers it when a boy.

As Elias Fries has had more influence on the development of the
mycology of Europe than all others combined, with the exception of

480

Perscon, I think it is quite interesting to put on record a picture of
his early environment. My best thanks are due to Professor Theodore
Fries, of Upsala, for furnishing the copy from which this illustration
is made.

THE GENUS LYCOGALOPSIS.

In my work with the puff balls I have never felt sure of the genus
Lycogalopsis. Specimens I have seen so referred I have always
thought were immature Lycoperdons. I was therefore greatly pleased
to receive from Dr. Chas. Bernard, Java, what I noted at once to be
a genus new to me, but which on investigation I find to be the genus
Lycogalopsis, as published by Professor Fischer. The value of this
genus rests for me on its peridium character. The plant grows on
rotting wood and develops on the surface of the wood a thick, white
subiculum. The little peridia are produced on this subiculum, or rather,
to speak more correctly, from this subiculum as the peridia are simply
continuations of the tissue of the subiculum. The peridia arc quite
thin, and rupture irregularly, and fall away in dehiscence, leaving cup-
shaped remains in the subiculum. as shown in Fig. 376. It is this
peculiar, peridial structure that gives the genus its value to me. as I
know no other that is similar. The interior of the puff ball shows
nothing very marked. There is no sterile base, and the pale olive
gleba, which consists mostly of a mass of spores, fills the interior.
The capillitium is very scanty and rudimentary. The spores are glo-
bose, pale, smooth, and 4-5 mic. in diameter. The surface of the
peridia is smooth and white. This little species came originally from
Java and was called Lycogalopsis Solmsii, the generic name, referring
to the resemblance of the peridia to those of the common Lycogala.

SOUTH AFRICAN PHALLOIDS.

J. Medley Wood, who has observed the plants of South Africa
for many years, favors me with an interesting note on the plialloicis.
He has noted but three species.

Kalchbrennera corallocephala is the most frequent species.

Phallus indusiatus is not rare, yet is not as frequent as the pre-
ceding.

Lysurus Woodii is extremely rare and in more than fifty years'
observation Mr. Wood has met it but once. The only collection was
made in one place not more than three or four yards in extent. 'Mr.
Wood has searched for it in the same locality since, but never found
it again. I do not believe the whole story of South African phalloids
has yet been told. Not long ago I saw in one of the museums a drierl
specimen, recently collected by S. T. Saxton, Cape Town, and while
I can not tell much from such a specimen, it is surely some species
bcth unique and unnamed.

482

Fig. 376

Lycogalopsis Solmsii x6 .

483

JANSIA TRUNCATA.
By D. McAlpine.

Volva creamy white, somewhat cup-shaped, slightly longer than
broad, averaging three- fourths inch in length, irregularly split at mar-
gin, narrowing towards base, and provided generally with one or two
slender, thread-like roots, which branch considerably in the humus.

Fig. 377.

Jansia truncata. Showing: ist. natural size ; 2d, enlarged ; 3d, the cellular structure of the inner face
enlarged. Photographs all from Professor D. McAlpine.

Stem arising in the gelatinous matter contained in the volva, and
easily detached, cylindrical, hollow, whitish at base, but gradually pass-
ing into a salmon-pink, the surface marked out into small polygonal
areas by shallow depressions.

Receptacle a direct continuation of the stem, but sharply distin-
guished by its deep, dark crimson color and surface, roughened by a
raised, irregular network, with meshes variable. The convolutions
are shown clearly in the photograph. It tapers slightly towards apex,
where it terminates in a distinct circular opening.

484

Gleba olivaceous, in slimy masses, scattered over the entire re-
ceptacle.

Spores very minute, hyaline, ellipsoid, with distinct contents, 3 to
.31/2 mic. long.

Over thirty specimens were found on a buffalo grass lawn in
front of my hou?e near Melbourne. They first appeared on the 27111 of
March, 1910, and an occasional one afterwards up to the 3ist of
March. They are very fragile and soon collapse. When fresh, the
smell could hardly be described as disagreeable, since it reminds one
strongly of scorched linen, the burnt smell caused by a hot iron. The
height was commonly 2^ to 3 inches, and in the latter case the relative
lengths of the different parts were : volva, y± inch ; stem, i V^ inch ; re-
ceptacle, i inch. Occasionally one or two "eggs" at different stages
of development were found attached to the mycelium of the volva.

We are pleased to publish the above description and photograph of a species of Jansia,
ncxivrcl from Professor McAlpine. Our first impression was that it was absolutely distinct
from anything known, in having a truncate, perforate apex. Since this article has been in
type we have received specimens in alcohol of Jansia rugosa, through the kindness of Dr. Ch.
Bernard, Java, and on comparing them with the alcoholic specimen received from Professor
McAlpine, we find that Jansia rugosa does have a perforate apex though it is contracted and
has not been noted by me in my previous accounts of this species. There is, therefore, no
real difference between Jansia truncata and Jansia rugosa on which a species may be based,
hut the Australian plant is so much larger and more robust and its truncate apex is so much
more prominent that it is well entitled to a name as a form.

Since like many phalloids it proves of wide distribution, it is probable that many of
the vague references of early phalloid literature should belong here; as for instance, Mutinus
proximus of Ceylon; perhaps Mutinus boninensis of Japan, Mutinus borneensis of Borneo,
and probably Mutinus minimus of China. The past work with the phalloids has been so
vaguely and inaccurately done that the identity of many of them is at best little more than
a guess.— C. (',. L.

Fio. 378.

Kodak snapshot. Three French " mycologues " at Upsala.
485

DIRECTIONS FOR MAKING A MUSEUM OF FUNGI.

The method of preserving the larger fungi, such as the Polyporei, has
changed somewhat in recent years frcm that formerly employed. In the
museums of Europe for the mcst part, as at Kew, Paris, and Upsala, the
specimens are glued down to sheets, somewhat after the same plan used in
making a herbarium of dried, flowering plants. While this method has ad-
vantages, such as compactness, it has disadvantages that more than offset the
advantages. It is evident that all that can he preserved of a large specimen
in this manner is a thin slice which often gives a very inadequate idea of the
species. In the modern museums, such as the Lloyd Museum at Cincinnati
•and the New York Botanical Gardens, these specimens are preserved in boxes
in their natural condition, each specimen in a separate box. The boxes are
made in different sizes in order to accommodate the various specimens, but
the sizes run in sets so they can be piled together in compact piles without
regard to the different sizes of the boxes. In the Lloyd Museum the original
sizes of the boxes were based on the shelving. The following are the standard
sizes we use in our museum. The measurements are in millimeters, and the
last represents the height of the box with the cover on.

Xo. 1/2. 70x64x22 mm.

No. i. 70x64x44 mm.

No. 2. 70 x 64 x 88 mm.

No. 3. 70 x 128 x 88 mm.

No. 4. 140 x 128 x 88 mm.

No. 5. 140x128x176 mm.

No. 6. 140x256x176 mm.

We strongly advise those who wish to make a collection of fungi to adopt
a series cf boxes, the sizes running by units as the above, as then all the
various sizes can be piled compactly. The sizes that we have adopted take
care of almost any size or shape of fungus that we receive, and in practical
use we mid that the greater part of them arc put in boxes No. y2 or No. i.

Preservation 'of Specimens.

Poisoning specimens. — The principal trouble that many have in making col-
lections of fungi is that specimens are apt to be eaten by insects. This is very
discouraging, but we have learned now how to avoid it in a very simple manner.
In the old collections where specimens are pasted on sheets they have to
be poisoned with a solution of corrosive sublimate and alcohol, but this is
very objectionable frcm the fact that it changes materially the condition of
the specimens and they are not in their natural condition after going through
the poisoning process. It was formerly my custom when I received specimens
to submit them to the fumes of carbon bisulphide, which is fatal to insect
life, but I have found that while it may kill the insects in the specimens it
does not kill the chrysalis, and specimens submitted to the fumes may have
chrysalides which will hatch out and eventually destroy the specimen. I learned
from Mr. Romell of Stockholm a very simple process which is as inexpensive
as it is effectual for specimens that are preserved in boxes, but of course does
not apply to specimens pasted on sheets. Simply put in each box a liberal
quantity cf flake naphthalene. For boxes the size cf No. l/2 and No. i a
teaspocnful, and for larger boxes a larger quantity in proportion. Flake
naphthalene does not affect the specimens at all, but it kills the insects, not
only those that may be in the plant, but those that develop afterwards. I
have recently gone through our private collection of some ten thousand speci-
mens or more and dumped into each box a sufficient quantity of this flake
naphthalene. I do not anticipate there will ever be any trouble in future with
insects in my collection. Flake naphthalene is comparatively inexpensive, and
two or three pounds will take care cf two or three hundred specimens. It
costs about fifteen cents per pcund.

486

THE GENUS CYCLOMYCES.

This genus is based on the concentric disposition of the pores.
With the exception of a few on the outer circles, they take a lamellate
form and then the genus can be briefly characterized as being Len-
zites with the lamellae concentric instead of radiate. It is a rare
genus, occurring only as far as known in the United States, the East
Indies, and African Islands. The genus was first described by Fries13
in 1830, and a fairly good cut given of it.14 It consists (as I believe)
of only two species, Cyclomyces fuscus and Cyclomyces Greenii.
These two species have different context and are put in different
genera by those who give preference to other than hymenial char-
acters.15 The curious, concentric disposition of the pores (and
lamellae) is a very prominent and seems to me to be a good char-
acter on which to base a genus.

Fid 379
fuscus (Natutal Si2

CYCLOMYCES FUSCUS (Fig. 370).— Pileus dimidiate (or
sometimes scutellate ), thin, coriaceous. Surface dark brown, velutinate

13 The name ufually attrched to it is Kunze, Frie
script label from Kunze, tterlin. The specimen came. I
least abundant material is at Ke

"Cyclomyces fusea, of G. Kunze. Mauritius, Sieber (Exs.).''
"Laxophyllum velutinum, Klotzsch."

having taken the name from a m
: think, from Telfaire, Ma
from this source, pnd also on the same sheet

Mauritius, at
co-type
Telfaire specimen is labeled

14 It can hardly be said to be correctly described, however, as he states "Asci immersed,
free, as in Polyporus."

13 In brief, Cyclomyces fu.-cus has abundant, colored setae and hyaline

epixylous. Cyclomyces Greenii has no setae and colored spores, ?nd grows in the ground.
This was first pointed out by Patouillard, but was approp

ores, and is
the gr
ted end juggled by Murrill.

487

with fine hairs, sulcate zonate. Gills narrow, close, concolorous, con-
centric, usually with cross partitions forming pores near the margin,
furnished with abundant colored setae (of the Hymenochaete type).
Spores (said to be) colorless, globose.

This plant was originally from Mauritius, but has since been found
abundantly in the East. There are specimens at Kew from Mauritius (abundant)
India (Perak), Malay, and Sarawak. It is also recorded from Java, and is
evidently a frequent plant through the East. It occurs also in Madagascar.1"
and the Philippines. The two following, I think, are synonyms : Cyclomyces
Beccarianus, from Sarawak, of which I have seen a co-type, identically the same ;
Cyclomyces stereoides, of which I know only the description, but do not question
it was based on a scutellate specimen. It came from the same region and the
"description" was practically the same.

Fig. 360

Cyclomyces Greeiiii Specimen from K. B. Sterling .

CYCLOMYCES GREENII (Fig. 380).— This characteristic
plant hardly needs any description other than our figure. As there
is no other plant in the United States with such a disposition of the
gills, it can not possibly be mistaken. The color is ferruginous, the

16I have recently seen at the British Museum a specimen in a German exsiccatae from
Madagascar. It is absolutely the same as the Mauritian and Indian plant. However, every

calls it "var. MadagaEcariensis."

texture soft, spongy, the surface velvety. In its color and context
nature it is very much the same as Polystictus tomentosus. There
are no setae on the gills, however. The spores are smooth, colored,
elliptical, 6x12 mic. It has a short, velvety stem, usually central,
though I have rarely seen excentric specimens.

Fig. 381
omyces turbinatus i Drawing by Patouillard).

Fig. 382
Cyclomyces Greenii (Photograph by Prol. Beardslee).

HISTORY. — This plant was found by Berkeley in Hooker's herbarium.
The specimen came from B. D. Greene, Tewkesbury, Massachusetts.17 It was
of much interest to Berkeley as the second known species of the genus. He
gave a good figure of it (by Fitch), and the plant has never had a synonym,

17 Who B. D. Greene was I do not know, excepting that this species was named for him.
Neither do I know who named it, though Berkeley published it. The original label in Hooker's
herbarium is in a writing I do not recognize, "Cyclomyces Greenii, Boston, U. S., B. D.
Greene." It was published from Tewkesbury, Mass. As far as I have noted, this is the only
plant sent to Kew from "B. D. Greene."

489

unless the Indian species is a synonym. There is also a specimen at Kew from
Sprague, Mass. Professor Peck found the plant on two occasions and spcks
of it as being rare, so that it has that reputation in the United States. Most
of the specimens come from the Eastern Stales. I have the following: from
Massachusetts, Simon Davis, Mrs. E. B. Blackford. and Hollis Webster; New
Jersey, E. B. Sterling; Maryland, W. T. Lakin ; Pennsylvania, Mrs. Geo. M.
Dallas, Charles Mcllvaine, and Dr. Herbst. I have never found it in Ohio,
although reported by Hard and Beardslee. I have a photograph from Iowa,
Macbride. Our illustration is made from a photograph by Professor Beardslee,
and from a specimen from E. B. Sterling.

RELATED SPECIES.

CYCLOMYCES TURBINATUS (Fig. 381).— This species is based on
two little, undeveloped specimens in Hooker's herbarium, from India, many
years ago. They seem to have the same color, context, spores, and other char-
acters as Cyclomyces Greenii, but differ slightly in shape, being as the name indi-
cates more conical or turbinate. I think it will prove to be pracfically the
same species as our American pfant. Additional specimens reached Paris
from Java and were called Cyclomyces Javanicus. A good account and illus-
tration of it was given. I feel so convinced that it is the same as the Indian
species (only better developed specimens) that I use the illustration.

A POLYPORUS THAT WEEPS.

The splendid photograph that we present on the opposite page
was taken by Professor G. D. Smith. I know no other who makes
as good fungus photographs as Professor Smith.

The subject is Polyporus dryadeus, and it is a very rare plant in
the United States. When I received the photograph I referred it to
Polyporus resinosus,30 as this was the only species I had observed in the
United States that weeps so abundantly. When later Professor Smith
sent me the specimen I found, on comparison, it was Polyporus dry-
adeus of Europe. I had not previously known this species to occur in
the United States.20 I had never before seen an American specimen,
but I had observed the fresh plant in France and found, on compan
son, that Professor Smith's specimen was the same as my European
specimens.

Polyporus dryadeus is net a common p!ant in Europe,21 and grows

19 I use this name in the sense in which it has always been used in America by Berkeley,
Ellis, Morgan, and others, and it appears to be in the sense of Fries' description. But I am
not satisfied with it. I do not know the plant in Europe, and besides it was most assured'y
not resinosus, of Schrader, where Fries got the name. Fuliginosus is the latest allegation
(ccpied from Bresadola), and while it is a very early date, the plant to which it was applied
in Europe is quite different from our American plant in several respects. Our plant is sure'y
a different variety, if not a different species.

:o I am aware that it is included in North American Flora, but as the author did nat
mention it when he wrote his account of the "genus," four years previously, I thought per-
haps it had been introduced since. Or possibly he had in the meantime seen Schweinitz's rec-
ord, not knowing that this was based on Polyporus gilvus. He also seems to have been very
careless in his compilations. He copies Fries' citation, Hussey, plate 26, which was an error
for plate 21. He ascribes the pedigree to "Polyporus dryadeus, Fries. Syst. 1821," and there
Fries states that he took the name from Persoon Obs. (1799). Had he looked up Persoon
he would have found that Persoon changed P.ulliard's name pseudo-igniarius (1784), which is
contrary to the dictum of Mr. Kuntze and the sacred precepts of priority. As I can not be-
lieve that the author would intentionally disregard these sacred principles, I must therefore
r;cribe it to very careless compilation. If he had looked up Schroeter's work he would have
found that Schroeter had already juggled it to Bulliard's name.

21 It is more common in England, France, and Central Europe, but very rare in Sweden.
Fries records it in an early work, but in his latest states he has only seen dried specimens.
Mr. Ron-.ell has recently collected it near Stockholm.

490

491

only on oak. It is noted for its rapid growth and the drops of water
that exude so abundantly from it in a growing state. Bulliard gave a
good illustration of it, showing these water drops, and commented on
them. Mrs. Hussey has also illustrated it, but her figure is not as good
as Bulliard's.

The plant that Professor Smith found grew on elm, and that was
one reason that led me at first to question my determination. In Europe
it is only known on oak.

We have a Polyporus in the United States, a common one, Poly-
porus resinosus (in the usual sense), that has the habit of exuding
drops of water from the growing plant. I have often noticed it, but
never saw so many tears as shown on Professor Smith's photograph.

WHAT A LONG TAIL OUR CAT DOES HAVE!

We present a photograph of the type material, all that exists, of
"Polyporus phaeoxanthus," and a copy of the wonderful story that ap-
^ peared about it in North American Flora. The modern

1 jjj mycologist is something of a paleontologist. He can
M W take a little frustule and build upon it an elaborate ac-
JN count that will rival the most extravagant romance of

^Ht H Baron Munchausen, and which is just about as true.
^'t, ; . "Pileus convex, subhemispherical, 2.5 x 0.5 cm. ; sur-

face smooth, glabrous, bay-brown, margin acute, straight,
Fig. 384. slightly undulate ; context fleshy, luteous, rigid, friable,
and much shrunken when dry, i to 2 mm. thick ; tubes remote, mi-
nute, very short, 0.5 mm. or less in length, mouths irregular, 6 to
8 to a mm., edges thick (specimen young), obtuse, luteous; spores
not examined ; stipe central, cylindrical, solid, fleshy, concolorous, floe-
cose at the base, 4 cm. long, 3 mm. thick. Type locality : Columbus,
Ohio. Habitat : Fallen oak wood. Distribution : Known only from
the type locality."

Some one has kindly sent us the following clipping taken from a newspaper :
"Wilm Knox, of the firm of Knox and Elliott, architects of the Rockefeller
and other noble buildings, is one of the best known micrologists in the world.
It is said, indeed, that with the exception of Ashley Lloyd, of Cincinnati, Mr.
Knox is the best authority on mushrooms in this or any other country. He
is constantly experimenting with these delicacies, and has produced" hitherto
unknown varieties that are almost intoxicating in the richness of their flavor.
He can, just by glancing at a mushroom of any shape, color, or size, give its
complete history and its 'ranking' among the almost countless varieties of
this favorite of the epicures."

We judge the above must have been written by the sporting editor. The
statement that Mr. Knox is a "micrologist" and "has produced hitherto
unknown varieties that are almost intoxicating in the richness of their flavor"
is characteristic of the usual reporter's account. Also the reference to Ashley
Llcyd in connection with "mushrooms" is amusing. He takes a great deal
more interest in "three-base hits" than he does in mushrooms.

492

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BV C. G. LLOYD.

No. 37.

CINCINNATI, O.

APRIL, 1911,

MONSIEUR EMILE BOUDIER.
UNIVERSITY OF'CALIFGRNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 0 1942

MONSIEUR EMILE BOUDIER.

MONSIEUR EMILE BOUDIER.

It seems to me that the successful completion of the magnificent
plates "Icones Mycologicae," by E. Boudier, is a propitious time for
the publication of a photograph of the author.

Monsieur Boudier needs no introduction to European readers.
For many years he has stood at the head, the acknowledged master of
French mycology. He was born on the 6th of January, 1828, and is
therefore now in his eighty-fourth year. His early life was devoted to
trade as a pharmacist, but he wisely retired about twenty-five years
ago, with a modest competency, devoting the remaining years of his
life to his favorite studies. He has acquired a most thorough knowl-
edge of the fungi that grow in France, and in addition is an artist of
unusual talent.

There have been a number of good artists who were not good
mycologists, who have issued plates of fungi, and several good mycolo-
gists who were poor artists. Monsieur Boudier is, in my opinion, the
first man to combine both talents. His plates are the acme of excel-
lence, both as to general appearance of the plants and the microscopic
structure. Every little detail is brought out with absolute accuracy,
and this has been at an expenditure of a world of patience and labor.
I am told that Monsieur Boudier will often spend two or three days
in making a single drawing. The 'Tcones Mycologicae," which has
just been brought to a successful finish, comprises six hundred plates
of French fungi, every one of them perfection. It is largely devoted
to the Discomycetes, which were always favorites of Monsieur Boudier.

-494

The study and work in mycology to which Monsieur Boudier de-
votes himself is purely as a recreation. He receives specimens from
a large circle of correspondents in France, and is as actively engaged
in the work to-day as he ever was. The various scientific societies
of France have honored him with the highest honors at their command.
The one that I think he cherishes the most was recently bestowed on
him by the French Academy of Sciences. It was only last year, No-
vember, 1910, that he was elected a member of this institution in the
grade "Chevalier de la Legion d'honneur." In America we do not
realize what that means to a Frenchman. It is the crowning am-
bition of every man of letters or science of France to be accorded
this rank, and it is one that relatively few ever attain.

We present on our first page the photograph of Monsieur Boudier,
that was issued as a frontispiece on the completion of his Icones. It
is an excellent photograph of him as he appears to-day. We present
also at the head of this article a photograph that was made about forty
years ago, when he began the study of mycology. Monsieur Boudier
does not recall his exact age when this photograph was made, but he
thinks he was between forty and forty-five years of age.

We congratulate Monsieur Boudier on the successful completion
of his magnificent "Icones Mycologicae," and also on the honors that
have resulted.

FUNGUS IN COMMERCE.

It is a true saying that one-half the world does not know how the other
half lives. Mr. W. E. Barker, of New Zealand, enclosed in a recent letter to
me a newspaper clipping which is reproduced below. I presume there is nothing
strange about such a newspaper item in the section where the fungus is an
article of commerce, but it is certainly worthy of remark that a fungus
should be collected to the value of over a million and a half dollars, and its very
name and use be unknown to the fungus students. I have written to Mr.
Barker, asking that he send me a specimen of the fungus so that I may identify
it. While I do not know, I rather suspect that what they are collecting so
largely in New Zealand and shipping to China is the common Jew's ear, Hirneola
auricula-Judae.

This fungus is common both in Europe and in America. It is not used to
any extent as food in our country, but I was shown this same fungus in one
of the Pacific islands, and told it was largely collected and shipped to China. It
is probable that it is a staple food among the Chinese. The article is as follows,
and is taken from the Taranaki Herald, Taranaki being a province of western
New Zealand.

"FUXGUS. — No one has yet fathomed the mystery of fungus. We know
what it is and where it comes from, but that is all. We know it is shipped
away, but are ignorant of where it goes and what becomes of it. It may truly
be said that this fungus industry was the first salvation of Taranaki, and very
few people are aware of its magnitude or of the amount of money it puts into
circulation. From 1870 to 1903 the Customs returns of New Plymouth show
that £305,995 was used in the actual purchase of the stuff from settlers. In
addition to this sum an equal amount was spent in labor in packing and in
freight. In 1903 Mr. Chong (a Chinese merchant who specialized in the product)
went to China, and the fungus business lapsed for a time ; but from 1904 to
IQOQ £58,793 was paid. This, with labor and freight, has caused a total cir-
culation of £700,000 in forty years — surely a very considerable work for one
man."

495

PAUL KLINCKSIECK.

PAUL KLINCKSIECK.

It is only just, I think, to accord to Monsieur Paul Klincksieck
due credit for the part he played in the production of Boudier's plates.
Monsieur Boudier told me before the plates were issued that he had
little hope of seeing them published, for to issue them in the manner
they merited would involve an expense that he feared would be pro-
hibitive. Monsieur Klincksieck was a man of intense nervous energy,
and he had the courage to undertake the production of this, a work
that would have appalled most publishers. When the publication of
these plates was announced, I doubted if they would be published in
the manner that such work deserved, but happily my misgivings were
not fulfilled. Monsieur Klincksieck spared neither expense, labor, nor
care in producing these plates, exhausting the possibilities of the highest
lithographic art. As with Monsieur Boudier the creation of these
plates has been a labor of love, so with Monsieur Klincksieck their
issue was a matter of pride as a publisher. It is indeed unfortunate
that he could not have lived to see the completion of the work.

From a monetary point of view, and Monsieur Klincksieck's chief
interest lay naturally in this direction, Boudier's plates were not a

496

success. I think they barely paid the cost of production. But it is
gratifying to know that they involved no loss, for when Paul Klinck-
sieck had the courage to undertake their production in this expensive
manner, he assumed the risk of a heavy loss.

I feel that Paul Klincksieck should be accorded all due honor for
producing in such a superb manner the "Icones Mycologicae" of
Boudier.

ANOTHER "FUNGUS." GONE WRONG.

Our figure 385 represents a growth that occurs on the living branches
of the Southern cypress (Taxodium distichum). I was glad to get specimens
from S. C. Edwards collected in North Carolina, for I wanted to investigate

its nature. I have seen it in the her-
barium of Schweinitz, at Philadelphia.
Schweinitz first called it Merulius Cup-
ressi. In his next work he called it
Cantharellus Cupressi, and he sent it to
Fries, and Fries called it Cyphella Cup-
ressi, and it so appears in Saccardo, vol.
6, page 674. Berkeley stated many years
ago that it was an insect gall, but Sac-
cardo did not seem to believe him, for
he compiled it among the fungi.

From a cursory examination of
Schweinitz's specimens I could not de-
cide what it was, though I felt quite sure
it was neither a Merulius, Cantharellus,
nor Cyphella, as it figures in our fungal
"literature." Upon receipt of these
specimens from my correspondent, I was
glad to be able to cut them open, and
it did not take me long to decide that
Berkeley was right, and that it is an
insect gall, for the cellular structure is
quite different from that we find in
fungi, and in addition I found on the
inside of each specimen a little orange
grub. I sent specimens to Mr. Mel T.
Cooke, who makes a special study of
the galls, and he advises me as follows :
"There is but one species of gall re-
ported on Taxodium distichum, and I

have specimens of that species. It is entirely different from the one you send
me. The gall which you send is of insect origin without doubt, and apparently
belongs to the genus Cecidomyia."

It therefore appears to be a "new species" of gall. As it is an "old species"
of fungus, does the name hold good? I think our learned law-makers are
silent on this point, though they give their "authority" to maintain just as bad
blunders of the old mycologists, as, for instance, Calvatia "cyathiformis" and
Geoglossum "rufum." Professor McGinty proposes to name it Cecidomyia
Cupressi (Schw.) McGinty, according to celebrated "legal" principles.

Unnecessary Information. — Dr. Bruce Fink recently published a list of
Boletaceae, which he informs us were largely determined by Murrill. As twenty-
two out of the twenty-seven names have Murrill's name written after them, it
was scarcely necessary to go to the trouble of stating who determined them.

Fig. 385

497

B. D. GREENE.

When we wrote our article on Cyclomyces Greenii, we admitted
that we did not know the identity of the "Mr. Greene" for whom it
was named. Our ignorance in this respect has shocked the editor of
the Torrey Bulletin, and he has kindly enlightened us. Our best thanks
are tendered to Mr. John Hendley Barnhart for the information, as
follows :

"Benjamin Daniel Greene was the son of a man who, in his day, was
known as the wealthiest citizen of Boston, Massachusetts. He was born at
Demerara, British Guiana, during a visit of his parents to that place, 29th De-
cember, 1793, and died at Boston I4th October, 1862. He was a graduate of
Harvard ; completed his education in Europe, and qualified himself for both law
and medicine, but never engaged actively in the practice of either profession.
He was a personal friend of Sir William J. Hooker, and many of his speci-
mens are at Kew, as well as in nearly every other important herbarium of his
day. He was one of the founders of the Boston Society of Natural History,
and its first president ; his herbarium formed the nucleus of the great botanical
collections of that society. For seventy-five years and more an oriental genus of
Rubiaceae, Greenea, has borne his name ; it was named in his honor by Wight
and Arnott, at a time when it meant something for two English botanists to
name a genus for an American. I am sure you would be interested in the
opinion of Asa Gray concerning the nature and extent of his botanical attain-
ments, which you can find in the American Journal of Science (Series II, vol.
35, pages 449 and 450. 1863), or in Gray's Scientific Papers, edited by Sargent
(vol. 2, pages 310 and 311.)"

THE REV. C. TORREND, S. J.

REV. C. TORREND, S. J.

The sympathies of the mycological world should be extended to
498

the Rev. C. Torrend for the deplorable persecution of which he has
recently been the unfortunate victim. During the recent revolution in

Portugal, his mon-
astery was ran-
sacked, the greater
part of his books,
his microscope and
photographic ap-
paratus, and many
of his specimens
were destroyed by
a fanatical mob.
He was thrown in
prison, and his life
was even in dan-
ger for some
weeks. At last he
escaped through
the intervention of
the French Consul,
the Rev. Torrend
being a French
subject. He is now
in Holland, safe in
F'fl 386 a Jesuit institution.

While his future

plans are not settled, he wrote to me that he would probably go to
Brazil. Such of his books and specimens as were saved are in charge
of the French Consul, and will be sent, for a time at least, to the
Museum at Paris.

I reproduce above a photograph of the Rev. C. Torrend, and
Fig. 386, a kodak view, showing him with a party of his students on
their return from a mycological expedition.

Whatever may be the religious opinions of my readers, I am sure
they will, with me, extend to Rev. Torrend our deepest sympathy in
this trouble. In this age of so-called civilization, it is a shame that
the inoffensive order of Jesuits should be singled out for persecution
at the hands of an irresponsible mob, and the fact that it is done under
the guise of "freedom" does not mitigate the crime. There are no
more self-sacrificing or devoted scientists than are to be found in this
same Order of Jesuits, and there are none that have added more to
the general fund of scientific knowledge. Whenever you meet a Jesuit
Father, you will find a man of the highest education, and I have always
found them liberal and tolerant in all their views.

While Rev. Torrend is naturally much discouraged at present,
having the results of his years of scientific work in Portugal so largely
destroyed, when he gets to Brazil in a new field, we have no doubt he
will return to his old love — mycology, with renewed ardor. Our best
wishes go with him.

499

HEXAGONAS.

Having studied and photographed every type specimen of Hexa-
gona in the museums of Europe, and having written a synopsis of the
genus, I feel in position now to pass on the specimens of this family
that I receive from my correspondents.

Mr. Edouard Luja, Congo Beige, has sent me a fine lot of Poly-
pores, including three species of Hexagona. One species, Hexagona
Henschalli, (cfr. Synopsis, page n) had reached Europe, there being
only a single specimen at Kew. Mr. Luja sends it abundantly. The
pores are large and flaccid, with a pale pore surface. A section through
the pore walls shows a-thick, white, exterior layer (hymenial probably)
quite distinct from the colored hyphae of the trama.

HEXAGONA POBEGUINI (Fig. 387, cfr. also Synopsis, page
1 8, fig. 295). — I thought I knew this species, having seen and photo-
graphed it in three different museums under three different names.

Fig 387
Hexagona Pobeguini.

but when I first saw Mr. Luja's specimens I did not recognize them.
The truth is, I think, that the species was named and described from
old specimens that have changed very much. Mr. Luja's are the first
good, typical specimens that have reached Europe. When the plant
is in good condition it is densely covered, both pileus and pores, by a
brown, velutinous coat that disappears largely from old specimens.

500

Old specimens also become thicker and more indurated. The pores
also vary much as to size, as shown in our fig. 387. Comparing this
figure with the one previously published (Synopsis, Fig. 295) one
would scarcely believe them to be the same plant. I feel assured now
they are different ages of the same species, though my first impression
was that Mr. Luja's plants were unnamed.

HEXAGONA DERMATIPHORA (Fig. 388) .—Another species
sent by Edouard Luja, Congo Beige, has the surface covered with a
thin, compact, isabelline, velutinate film, such as is found in no other
species. It might also be sought in the section Velutinus. but its other
characters are so close to Hexagona tennis tha*t it is usually better

Fig. 388
Hexagona dermatiphora.

placed there. This covering disappears, or more properly is not de-
veloped, near the margin. The thickness, color, context, and pores
are the same as those of Hexagona tenuis ; in fact it might be classed
as a form of this species. The pores are small, regular, with thin walls,
and are dark colored, with a faint purplish cast. I would place it next

501

to Hexagona tenuis, differing from it and from all others in this section
in the thin, velutinate pellicle that covers the pileus.

HEXAGONA SUBTENUIS.— In a personal letter received from
the Rev. Bresaclola, he claims that in my Synopsis of the genus Hexa-
gona, I have taken too broad a view of the species Hexagona tenuis,
that this species is confined to American territory, and that all the forms
from India and the East should be referred to other species. I readily
admit that Hexagona tenuis, in the sense in which I have taken it, is a

Fig 389

Hexagona subtenuis.

heterogeneous assembly of plants, and I suspect that with abundant
material other species may be differentiated. I have just received from
Col. K. R. Kirtikar, Bombay, nice specimens (Fig. 389) of what I
have published as Hexagona subtenuis, basing the name on a specimen
in Berkeley's herbarium. It differs from the type form of Hexagona
tenuis not only in the more rugulose upper surface, but in the color
of the pores which are distinctly yelloivish. I think this is a good
species, quite distinct from tenuis." We hope in time to get a clear
idea of the distribution and forms, but we can not without abundant
material.

Correction.— The last paragraph on page 460 was written by myself and
does not belong to Professor McGinty's article, as the printer has made it
appear. I assume no responsibility for Professor McGinty's opinions; in fact,
do not always endorse them, and I certainly would not wish to place upon him
any responsibility for my opinions.

502

LENZITES OCHROLEUCA.

Among a fine collection of specimens received from Col. K. R.
Kirtikar, Bombay, India, was a curious ear-shaped, irpicoid form of
Lenzites ochroleuca (Fig. 390). This species seems to be very com-
mon in the East and it takes many hymenial forms. Col. Kirtikar
sends me three distinct types. We have considered the plant at length
in our Synopsis of the genus Hexagona, but will have to refer to it in
every "genus" we consider, for it is an Irpex, a Hexagona, a Trametes,

Fig. 390
L,enzites ochroleuca, Irpicoid form.

a Daedalea, and a Lenzites at one and the same time. Rarely do we
find two collections the same as to the hymenium, and sometimes the
same specimen presents three different types. The only constant thing
about it is the color of surface, context and hymenium, the texture, and
its distant plates or gills. Bresadola writes to me that I have included
three species in the synonyms I gave. That may be true, but I see no
means of distinguishing them except the hymenial configuration, and
in this "species" hymenial configuration counts for nothing at all. The
old mycologists who made a "new species" of every specimen they
received, made of this about twenty species. Bresadola makes three
species, but at present I make but one.

Apology. — My apologies are due and extended to Miss White for the
printing of the specific name of Phallogaster Whitei in lower case type in my
recent phalloid synopsis. We do not believe in printing personal specific names
in lower case, notwithstanding that it was sanctioned by some mighty "law-
makers" (cfr. Myc. Notes, p. 347). This list was made up while in Europe,
and I had forgotten the specific name for this alleged species and directed
it to be supplied at my home office. Unfortunately it was supplied in lower case.

503

NEWS FROM OUR LAWMAKERS.

Less than a year ago a galaxy of bright, legal stars were solemnly
assembled at Brussels to make laws for the mycological world. The
constellation was not as brilliant as had been planned. Of the fourteen
men that had been appointed as a committee to make our laws for
fungi, eight of them, viz : Boudier, Bresadola, Earle, Fischer, Massee,
Patouillard, Saccardo, and Ward, were conspicuous by their absence.
Ward died before the meeting. What reasons the others may have had
for not appearing I do not know, excepting the two that I have since
seen. I gathered from my conversation with them that they were not
strongly enamored with the task of making laws for other people.

Professor Arthur was there, representing New York, but he had
little to say. It is generally understood that the New York lawmakers
received enough law at Vienna to last them the remainder of their
lives. Those of the -New York contingency at Vienna who had been
appointed to the Brussels Congress, viz : Earle, Evans, and Airs.
Britton, were likewise absent. Professor Magnus was there, but after
the first round of lawmaking his interest waned, and he was not much
concerned as to the subsequent proceedings. Perhaps there were one
or two others of the original mycological committee there, but my
informant was not very clear on that point, excepting as to two, Atkin-
son and Maire. They were both there and were very much in evidence.
What they lacked in numbers they made up in votes. I was told that
Maire voted eleven times and Atkinson five or six on each proposition.
At any rate they made a law that all fungi should have as a start-
ing point Fries' Systema, except the Uredinales. Ustilaginales. and
Gasteromycetes which begin with Persoon's Synopsis (1801). They
must have made this law for other people, for neither of them observe
it.

Atkinson has since published a Gasteromyces, "Ithyphallus impu-
dicus" which Persoon called Phallus impudicus. This is not in accord-
ance with their law, as the genus Ithyphallus was made by dividing
the old Persoonian genus Phallus into two genera and by abandoning
the original genus. Such work was always irregular, and since the
Vienna Congress has been directly contrary to Art. 45 of the law which
prescribes what shall be done in such a case and leaves no discretion
whatever in the matter. Atkinson's use of the genus Ithyphallus is
in direct violation of his law. It is possible that he was not altogether
unconscious of this fact at the time.

Maire has since published Lycoperdon fragilis which is also con-
trary to law, for the plant had a specific name prior to fragilis and
subsequent to Persoon, and Lycoperdon fragilis is not "starting with
Persoon." Perhaps Maire did not know this.

One characteristic of lawmakers is that they are very willing to
make for others laws which they can not apply themselves. I wonder
if there was a man at Brussels (or if there is one elsewhere) who knows
enough of the history of the Gasteromycetes to carry their nomen-

504

clature correctly back to the days of Persoon. It seems to me very
illogical to make a law requiring others to do what the makers them-
selves can not or will not do.

MUTINUS BAMBUSINUS.

We present herewith an excellent photograph (Fig. 391) of Muti-
nus bambusinus, which we have received from Mr. C. B. Ussher, Straits
Settlements^ We published in our Synopsis of the Phalloids a figure

F TJH ( Fig. 26 ) of this species, but it is not as clear nor does

/4 it show the cellular structure of the stem as well as the

JS« photograph that Mr. Ussher sent. Mutinus bambusi-

fc3 nus is widely spread in the tropics and appears to be

J&Si the most common species of Mutinus in warm coun-

tries. It replaces there Mutinus caninus of Europe,
and Mutinus elegans of the United States. It was
originally named from Java, but is found in the Cele-
bes, Brazil, and doubtless in many warm countries.
It has appeared adventitiously a few times in the hot-
houses at Kew. This tropical species is quite similar
to Mutinus caninus of Europe, but has a larger, more
pointed, more rugulose, fertile portion. The cells of
the fertile portion are small, in strong contrast to
those of the stem. The entire plant is red.

In publishing Mr. Ussher's fine photograph, we
would again call the attention of those residing in
warm countries to the importance of photographing
their phalloids. Only by means of photography will a
correct knowledge of tropical phalloids ever be ob-
tained. We trust that Mr. Ussher will not fail to
photograph all he finds for the phalloids of his sec-
tion have never been worked, and he will doubtless
find some novelties as well as add to our knowledge
of the distribution of the "old species."

Since this was written we learn that Mr. Ussher
has accepted a position in Java. We are rather sorry,
for Java phalloids are well known while those of
Fig. 391 Straits Settlements are hardlv known at all.

The Type Locality.

ity " of each

jump at conclusions and make some funny mistakes. Thus in North An
that Polyporus Columbiensis came from the "type locality, Columbia river, South Carolina" and
that its " Distribution is South Carolina." The type specimen did' not grow within twelve hundred
miles of South Carolina, and I doubt if the author ever saw a specimen from South Carolina or from
anywhere else, or would know it if he did, or for that matter if any one else would know it either.
The "type" is a little, discolored remnant that should never have been named. It has never been
recognized since it was" described" seventy years ago and never will be, and was never within a thousand
miles of South Carolina. What rubbish they do scrape up and pass off for science nowadays!

505

A CURIOUS HOME FOR INSECTS.

While collecting at Albany I noted a Myxomyces (Figs. 392 and 393 x6)
with curious chimney-like tubes, that on examination proved to be the home of
some insect, some sort of a "fly," I judge. The Myxomyces is Enteridium
Rozeanum (of Lister) or Enteridium splendens (of Macbride)1 but what the
"fly" is I do not know. The ways of nature are most curious. Here we have
a fly that probably lays its eggs only in this particular species of Myxomycetes,
and it is a plant that I have noted very rarely in the woods. The common

Fig. 392

Fig. 393.

Lycogak Epidendrum, which is a very similar plant, was developed in abun-
dance by the side of this Enteridium, and not a specimen was affected. A
mycologist might confuse these two plants, but the fly knew them apart. While
it may be a well known phenomenon to the entomologists who study such
things, these "fly" cases in Myxomycetes seemed very strange to me.

MYXOMYCETES OF SAMOA.

On my trip to Samoa I have collected such Myxomycetes as came to my
notice. As I have never worked with this family I have given them to Professor
Macbride, who determines them as listed below. It is a pleasure to note, and a
further evidence of the wide distribution of the species of fungi, that among
those that grew in that distant island there is not a single "new species." The
nomenclature is in accordance with Professor Macbride's book.

Arcyria punicea
Physarum sinuosum
Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa
Tilmadoche alba
Badhamia capsulifera
Hemitrichia Wigandii
Leocarpus fragilis
Stemonitis axifera
Stemonitis Smithii
Fuligo ovata
Trichia scabra

A DECEPTIVE "FUNGUS."

Miss Mary Fitzgerald has been one of my most valued correspondents
from the South, as she has the faculty of picking up odd things such as rarely

reach me from other correspondents.

Recently she sent me some butterflies
with yellow, club-shaped bodies growing
from their eyes. Photograph increased
six diameters shows these little bodies.
Miss Fitzgerald took them for parasitic
fungi, and so did I, particularly as I ex-
amined them through a microscope and
found them composed of cells filled with
granular matter that I mistook for spores.

As I know nothing whatever about
parasitic fungi on insects, I sent them to
Prof. Roland Thaxter, who is the world's
authority on this class of fungi, and he ad-
vises me that the bodies are not fungi at
all, but the pollinia of Asclepias which the
insect attaches to its head when hunting
the nectar of the flower.

These bodies are all attached by a slen-
der base with the thickened, club-shaped
apex extending in front. They look just
like a little clavate fungus, and would be
PI 394 ,X6) apt to deceive almost any one.

PHALLUS INDUSIATUS AS FOOD.

We reproduce an interesting letter received from Professor S. Kawamura,
of the Botanical Institute of Tokyo, with reference to the use of Phallus in-
dusiatus as food among the' Chinese.

"Many times I have been asked about the scientific name of a fungus
called "Chikuson" in Chinese, which is used for cooking in China. But I had
not had occasion to see the plant and had not heard enough about it to know
what kind of a plant it is. I have now had opportunity to examine the dry
specimens of this plant, given to the Botanical Institute by Dr. Yabe, who had
been in Peking for five years. From those specimens I have found they are
the stems, veils, and cups of a fungus named Dictyophora phalloidea, Desv.

"At the same time I was surprised to know that this plant is really eaten
by mankind, because this is a fungus considered as poisonous by many authors,
and there is no mycologist to this day who tells of the use of this fungus. The
smell of its mucous gleba is very detestable, and so distinctive that a specimen
may be detected many feet away. Whenever I examined with a microscope
the fresh specimens of this fungus I found in the spores many bacteria in motion.
Because of this aspect I approve of the poisonousness of this fungus, though
any poisonous ingredient was not yet isolated from fungus. And if these bac-
teria themselves would not be injurious to the human body, they would produce
some poison by their powerful, decaying effect. Now I have learned that the
very fungus considered as poisonous is used for food in China. It is said that
the caps and stems, with the reticulate veils of the plant, are collected, leaving
the volvas in the ground, and are carefully washed with water to free from
the detestable mucous, and are then dried by exposure to the sun, and sent to the
market."

I suppose no one need be surprised at what a Chinaman may eat, yet to
an ordinary mortal a phalloid would be the last thing he would ask for as
food. It is possible, however, that putting aside sentiment, phalloids may be as
good food as rats, puppies, or bird's nests, which are all highly esteemed in
China. It all seems to be a question of taste and education, and when you

507

come to think about it there is no more reason why a phalloid should not be
eaten than why one should not eat Limburger cheese. The odors are very
similar, and the writer has to acknowledge a weakness for the product of our
German friends. I think, however, there is no possibility of his acquiring a taste
for phalloids.

PHALLUS IMPERIALIS AND PHALLUS IMPUDICUS.

We extract the following from an interesting letter from Professor A.
Jaczewski, St. Petersburg, Russia.

"I can not quite agree with your writings about Phallus imperialis and
Phallus impudicus being the same species, for I find, at least in Russian speci-
mens, a great and marked difference, not only in the color of the volva that has
naturally no great importance, but in the shape of the egg and in the markings
of the pileus. The egg of Phallus imperialis, instead of being globose as is that
of impudicus, is elongated in shape and the reticulations of the pilei are much
larger."

Our best thanks are returned to Professor Jaczewski for advising us as to
these points. He also calls to our -attention that the volva of impudicus habit-
ually breaks and remains as a sort of cap or pileus. That is a usual character
also in this country as I have frequently noted from specimens, and as Professor
Peck noted when he discovered it was a "new genus."

Professor A. Jaczewski reports concerning specimens that I sent him from
America that our American plant appears quite different to him from the
European in the reticulations of the pileus. It is a question whether our Ameri-
can plant should be referred to Phallus imperialis or as a pink variety of Phallus
impudicus.

THE PHALLOIDS OF MAURITIUS.

We extract the following from a letter from C. A. O'Connor, of Mauri-
tius, and publish it, as it is such information regarding the distribution of
phalloids that leads to a better knowledge of them.

"I have found hundreds of Phallus indusiatus growing in sugar cane fields
during the rainy season. They were of different shape, size, and color. Some
were as large as the form you named P. mauritianus ; others only one-fourth
and even less than this size. Several had their veil of orange color, others
light pink, and many pure white. Plants were also observed with rudimentary
veils ; a few had their veils attached to the pileus instead of the stem as is
usually the case. An appreciable difference was also noticed in the size of the
meshes of the different forms. A name juggler would have had a fine oppor-
tunity of creating at least a half dozen new species. In the most common form
the veil is rigid when the plants are collected a few hours after sunrise ; as soon
as the heat of the sun reaches them the veil hangs loosely down and has not
the same appearance as that of a plant which has just ruptured its volva.

"I have not yet found any Simblum periphragmoides resembling Fig. 83,
page 64 of the Synopsis of the Known Phalloids. Probably it is an abnormal
form. Mr. Telfair, who sent the specimen to Hooker at Kew, was the proprietor
of a sugar estate in the vicinity where I reside, and I would surely have come
across this Phalloid if it grew commonly here."

It will be noted that Mr. O'Connor's observations confirm the opinion of
Professor Fetch that species based on the coloration, such as Phallus multicolor
and Phallus callichrpus, can not be maintained as distinct forms of the type,
white form, Phallus indusiatus. He also confirms Professor Fetch's observation
that Phallus Moelleri, cfr, Synopsis, page 19, fig. 13, is only an early condition
of the same plant.

Further Appreciation of Prof. McGinty. — "I greatly enjoy your breezy, in-
dependent way of writing, and pray convey to the redoubtable Professor McGinty
my appreciation of his researches. I wish he might turn his mind to the Sper-
matophytes, for a great field is open to a man of his talents." — Extract from
a letter from P.— Cal.

508

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. LLOYD.

Old Species Series, No. 1.
CINCINNATI, O. JUNE, 1908.

SOME OLD SPECIES.

Nine tenths of the current mycological literature is devoted to the exploit-
ation of new species. However important this may be to the authors, the general
readers are more anxious to learn about the old ones. We expect from time to
time to devote a pamphlet to the "old species." We shall select those that are
most noteworthy and which lend themselves best to photography. In fact we
shall expect our photographs to tell more of the story than our words. We shall
not attempt any dry, technical descriptions of the plants, for the trouble with a
great deal of the current literature is that so much is written and so little told.
In fact, a great deal that is printed is put in to fill out and the leading truths
about a plant are often hid in a mass of verbosity about unimportant details.

Nor do we claim any critical knowledge of a great many plants that will be
included in this series. We firmly believe, from the developments in our study
of the Gastromycetes, that the fungous flora of the world is practically the same,
and that one can not have a critical knowledge of the forms of any one country
without a critical knowledge of the whole. Of course this is impossible in a
great many groups of fungi that we shall have to consider. The best we can do
is to give the history of the plants as they are known in American mycology, and
if it develops that in other countries they have other histories and other names,
that will be a matter for the future, or for some one else. There are some
sections of American fungi, such as the resupinate Thelephoraceae, of which I at
present know very little: in fact, we think there is but one man in America who
does know them — Professor E. A. Burt, Middlebury, Vermont. We hope to learn
them some day and have been patiently waiting for Professor Burt's long prom-
ised and long delayed paper.

While these papers will be devoted to "old species," it is possible that in
considering special groups we may have plants we are unable to determine. We
shall not claim that they are new species, however, because we recognize the fact
that we know but a small fraction of the old species in these same groups, and
without that knowledge we feel it would be an assumption to pose as the author
of new species. We trust and believe that these plants will be very few in
number, for of the many specimens from the United States that reach us there
are few that we can not refer to some old species that we know. That is, in those
families in which we have worked with the old species. There are of course a
few endemic species in the United States, but they are relatively rare and the
greater part of them have now several names.

TROGIA CRISPA (Figs. 211 and 212). — If you live in localities
where the alder grows you will be very apt to find Trogia crispa for
it is particularly partial to the alder. However, it grows on beach
and other frondose \vood and I have collected it on oak. It can be
known at once by the crisped, swollen gills for we have no other fungus

UNIVERSITY &F CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 0 1942

in the temperate regions with this character. It is one of those
agarics of a fleshy-coriaceous, tough nature, which dries up and persists
through the dry weather, and revives and opens out when wet. Our
figures were made from specimens that had been expanded by
moisture. As there is no other fungus in America or Europe that
can be compared with it (unless possibly the next) we feel. our photo-
graphs are all the description necessary.

Fig. 211. Fig. 212.

Trogia crispa. — Fig. 211, natural size. Fig. 212, enlarged ;'x 4).

HISTORY. — It is a frequent plant, particularly in sections where the alder
grows. It has not a clear title to the generic name Trogia, for it was originally
applied to tropical species now held by some to not be co-generic. But the plant
has so long monopolized the name in works on European and American mycol-
ogy that I think it can never be dislodged.1 Likewise the specific name has been
questioned, particularly among our German friends who have been doing a little
date dictionary investigating as to Persoon's and Fries' synonyms.2

Ht has been classed also as Merulius and Cantharellus, and the latter is where I think it
ought to have been left.

2 When Persoon named it he gave as a synonym, "Merulius fagineus of Schrader," and it
has been copied in every list of synonyms since. I do not think that Persoon or any one else
knew that it was the plant so designated in Schrader's vague work, but it was alleged to be a
synonym and the date dictionary shows it to be an earlier dale. So it was changed notwith-
standing the fact that its usual name crispus is by far the better name for it, and the only
specific name that can not be questioned.

SCHIZOPHYLIvUM COMMUNE (Figs. 213, 214 and 215).—
This is one of the most common plants that occur in this country,
and the collector is sure to note it almost every time he goes to the
woods. From our illustrations it can not be mistaken. The plant is
tough, and revives under the influence of moisture. The gills are

Fig. 213

Fig. 214

Fig. 215.

Schizophyllum commune. — Fig. 213, upper surface. Fig. 214, 1
(both natural size). Fig. 215, gills enlarged x 6

lower surface

peculiar. There is no other fungus like it in the temperate world.
The gills are split along the edge so that they appear deeply channeled
or double.3 (See Fig. 215, enlarged six times). We feel that a
description of the plant is unnecessary.

3De Bary says " they split from the edge to the middle, parallel to the surface into two
plates which curve away from one another as they continue to grow. The dorsal surfaces are
sterile and hairy with spreading hyphae branches."

HISTORY.— This is a most abundant plant in this country and is widely
distributed in the world. We have specimens in our collection from Hawaii,
Samoa, Barbados, Bahamas, Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Brazil, Ecuador, New
Caledonia, Tasmania, Australia, India, two from Europe and many from the
United States. The tropical forms are usually more lobed, but we think really
the same species. It grows in Europe but, strange to say, there it is relatively
an infrequent plant. From the books I judge it is most common in the " Midi " of
France In Stevenson there is a discussion as to whether it is really a native of
England or introduced. I never found it in the three seasons that I collected in
Europe and I have it from only two of my European correspondents, viz: Rev. L/.
Badet, Italy and E. WulfF, Crimea. It was very happily named by Fries, the
generic name referring to the split gills and the specific name to its common
occurrence in many countries. There was a legend that it was Agaricus alneus
of Linnseus and some priorists call it Schizophyllum alneum. It is a foolish
change to make if it were true4 because it is the most common species we have,
and does not grow on alder once out of a dozen times, and occurs in thousands of
locations and many countries where alder does not grow.

PHYSALACRIA INFLATA (Figs. 216, 217, and 218.)— This
little fungus grows in tufts, on logs and sticks, but is not common,
and I think is of northern distribution only. I have collected it in
Michigan and Vermont, but I never found it around Cincinnati. I
have specimens also from Professor Burt. It consists of little, un-
even, globose, hollow, fleshy heads, about 3 to 4 mm. in diameter,
supported on slender pedicels from 6 to 10 mm. long. The pedicels
appear pruinose under a hand glass, caused by a number of micro-
scopic, glandular hairs. The hymenium surrounds the globose head,
and consists of fusoid, crested cystidia and numerous clavate basidia.5
The spores are hyaline, elliptical, smooth, 3x5 mic. The color is
white, discoloring somewhat when old. Sometimes the heads are
closely crowded together and somewhat confluent, the pedicels short-
ened, and in this condition it has the general appearance of a white
Tremella.

HISTORY. — Schweinitz sent the plant to Fries under the manuscript name
I,eotia inflata, but Fries placed it in the genus Mitrula. The genus Mitrula as now
understood has spores in asci, but in those days was based on the shape of the
fungus. Schweinitz listed it (N. A. Fungi No. 1068) as Mitrula inflata, but there
is no specimen in his herbarium. Cooke (Mycographia T. 344) puts it in the
genus Spathularia, and gives a very inaccurately drawn and colored figure that
might represent an imaginary Spathularia, but does not at all represent the
fungus. He was unable to find "fruit" and considered that his specimens were

4 This is so obviously only a date dictionary juggle that I do not feel it is worth the trouble
to look it up or disprove it. I suspect if the matter could be sifted it would probably be found
what Linnzeus called Agaricus alneus, was Trogia crispa. He claims to have found it in
• Sweden, but he was far more likely to have found Trogia crispa than Schizophyllum commune
.in Sweden. To be sure he says the gills were " bifid " which is the only clue to the identity o f
:his plant, but he was just as apt to have meant that they were dichotomous as that the edges
•were split. There is no question as to Agaricus alneus of Bulliard, but it is farcical to write
"Liniiitus " after the specific name on any printed evidence that exists.

e are not expert enough with the microscope to assure ourselves of the nature of the
s clavate bodies we found to compose the hymenium. We could readily make out

5 We

numerous

numerous large, crested, fusoid cystidia similar to those of an Inocybe. We sent specimens to
Rev. Bresadplaand he writes us: -'The spores are 2-2^ x 4-5, basidia with 4 sterigmatae, 4-6 x
18-25, cystidia fusoid or clavate, 8-10 x 40-50.

sterile. Peck announced (Bull. Torr. Club, 188^, p. i) that the spoies are borne
on basidia (not in asci as previously supposed) and he established for it a new
genus Physalacria, now generally classed with the Clavariaceae. There has been
but this one species found in northern United States and it is rare. Ellis
claimed to have found a new species from Louisiana, which is unknown to me.

Fig. 217

Fig. 218
Physalacria inflata.— Figs. 216 and 217 natural size. Fig. 218 enlarged x6.

THE GENUS FISTUUNA.— The genus Fistulina is based on
the character of separate tubes. In general appearance the tubes re-
semble the pores of a Polyporus, but in the latter the walls of the
pores are not separated from each other, and in Fistulina each tube
is separate and distinct. Our enlarged photograph (Fig. 220) will
show this tube structure as we think never before illustrated.6 We
have two species of Fistulina in the United States, both of them
rather rare.

6 Excepting by De Seynes. The best work ever done with this genus was by De Seynes,
and of the many illustrations published in Europe I think his truest to nature.

FISTULINA HEPATICA (Figs. 219, 220, and 221.)— This is
the original and only species of Europe, and is more frequent in Eu-
rope than with us. It grows on the oak (Quercus) in Europe, but

Fig 219.

Fistulina hepatica, natural size.

with us I think is usually found on the chestnut (Castanea).7 It is
a rather tough, juicy, fleshy plant, red and a section of the plant shows
a variegated color, streaked with darker red lines.8 It is a striking

7 It is apparently absent around Cincinnati where we have oaks but not chestnuts, but I
have collected it in Pennsylvania where Dr. Herbst told me it was found only on chestnut.

8 1 am satisfied that the red color is due to the action of the air on some chemical principle
in the plant. The flesh of the very young plant is white but quickly turns red on exposure to
the air.

plant to one who collects it for the first time. Being frequent in Eu-
rope it figures in almost every popular work on fungi and has been il-
lustrated many times. They call it the "beefsteak" fungus, and write a
lot of stuff comparing it to "juicy beef-steaks" and finding large speci-
mens that would furnish "four or five men a good dinner." A sec-
tion of it does look something like a piece of meat, but the resem-
blance stops there, and it can be no more compared to a beef-steak,
either for flavor or quality, than can a piece of sole-leather. The
young plant is covered on the upper surface with papillae, somewhat
like those on the tongue, and the French call the plant "langue-de-
boeuf " or tongue of a beef. The under surface has small, whitish

Fig. 220

Fig 221

Fig. 220. The tubes of Fistulina hepatica enlarged x6.^
Fig. 221. The mouths of pores enlarged x6.

granules arrayed around the mouths of the pores as shown in Fig.
221, which is an enlargement six diameters of the pore surface. Our
figure (219) will give a good idea of the fresh plant if you will bear
in mind that the plant is red. Also the section was made from a
young specimen, for the pores are 6 to 8 mm. long when grown. It
seems to me from my dried specimens that the flesh of the American
plant is thinner than in the usual European form which we figure.
The plant has been known as Fistulina hepatica for a hundred years,
but having had other names in pre-historic times, it will no doubt ac-
quire new ones when the name changers get to work on it.

OTHER SPECIES OF FISTULINA.— There have been four other "new
species " discovered in the United States. There is evidence of but one, which
is about the usual proportion of these finds. This one is scantily known to me,
and is called Fistulina pallida, and I think well illustrated by Atkinson.

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Europe, France: N. Patouillard, Victor Dupain, C. G. Lloyd; Sweden: C. G.
Lloyd; Italy: Rev. L. Badet.

America, New Jersey : E. B. Sterling; Pennsylvania: C. G. Lloyd.

LENTODIUM SQUAMULOSUM (Figs. 222 and 223).— The
genus L,entodium is held by every mycologist, except its author,
to be something abnormal. Professor Morgan, however, always

Fig. 222.
Lentodium squamulosum (natural size).

maintained to the last conversation I had with him that it was a
distinct and good genus. It is the general impression that L,en-
todium squamulosum is a metamorphosed form of Lentinus tigrinus.
It was so referred by Berkeley sixty years ago, and it will so impress
most any one who will study the question.9

9Since this article has been written we have received a pamphlet from G. R. Lyman which
takes the grounds that Lentodium squamulosum is autonomous. It is the first published en-
dorsement of Morgan's views that we have noticed.

First, It has the same color, shape, size, scales, texture and spores as
Lentinus tigrinus.

Second, Plants imperfectly metamorphosed as shown in our figure are
not rare.

Third, A number of plants are known to assume abnormal forms thus.
Myriadoporus is acknowledged to be a form of various polyporoids, Ptycho-
gaster a conidial form of others, and in the Gastromycetes I claim that
Catastoma juglandaeforme is probably only a curious anomaly of Catastoma
castanea.

fig. 223
A section of Lentodium squamulosum enlarged x6 .

Professor Morgan always maintained that no known abnormality
has normal spores, that Myriadoporus is sterile, Ptychogaster is
conidial, while Lentodium has normal basidial spores. It is also a
curious fact that in Europe where Lentinus tigrinus is common in
certain localities, Lentodium squamulosum is unknown and in our
country Lentodium is not infrequent and Lentinus tigrinus is rare.
Similar abnormalities of agarics are frequently caused by parasitic
fungi as the common Hypomyces Lactifluorum but there is no
evidence of any parasitic species in connection with Lentodium.
Patouillard has suggested " des parasites animaux " but that also is
only a supposition without any proof. We present (fig. 223) an
enlargement of a section of the interior of Lentodium squamulosum.
It will be seen that the gills anastomose and form an irregular, porous
mass. The spores are in the greatest abundance and are elliptical,
3x5 mic. hyaline, smooth. Whether Lentodium squamulosum is
autonomous or not, the name is very convenient to designate this form.

SPECIMENS IN OUR COI^ECTION.

Ohio, Professor A. P. Morgan (type) : Illinois, J. Schneck : Mississippi, Dr.
N. S. Davis: Dist. Columbia, H. E. Warner: Kentucky, C. G. Lloyd: Iowa, James
F. Clarke : New Jersey, E. B. Sterling (3 collections) : Pennsylvania, Mrs.
Hannah Streeter: Michigan, O. E. Fischer: Minnesota, Mrs E. F. Elliott, Dr. M.
S. Whetstone : Vermont, C. G. Lloyd.

TREMELLA CLAVARIOIDES (Fig. 224.)— A rare plant, I
judge, has been received from Professor G. D. Smith of Akron, Ohio,
and Dr. Mary S. Whetstone of Minneapolis, Minn. I have never
seen it growing nor did I find it in Professor Peck's museum. It is
a pure white Tremella that has the general appearance of being a
Clavaria. The substance is gelatinous, though it is firmer than most
Tremellas and retains its form even when very moist. It has the
typical basidia and spores of a Tremella and the gelatinous nature,

Fig 224

Tremella clavariodes.

and therefore will have to be classed as the genus Tremella though
it can not be entered in any of the present sections of the genus,
and a new section, Clavariformis, must be made to include it.10 In
drying the plant shrivels but retains its form, and on moistening it
soon assumes its growing shape and size. Our photograph (Fig.
224) was made from a dried specimen that had been moistened.

30 My friend, Professor McGinty, suggests that it would be simpler to make a "new
genus," as that will surely be done as soon as the facts are published. He proposes the name
"Cprticioides reticulatum, new genus, McGinty," on the same principle apparently (it being
neither a Corticium nor reticulate} that the name Tremellodendron was proposed for plants
that are neither " Tremellas " nor " trees."

10

HISTORY.— When I received this plant I was unable to find any description
that seemed to me to at all apply to it. The nearest was Tremella fusiformis,
with which I was not familiar. I sent it to Dr. Farlow, and he kindly advises me
it is the same plant that was called by Berkeley n " Corticium tremellinum var.
reticulatum " (sic.) The plant would therefore, according to the celebrated prin-
ciple— " I saw it first " — be named Tremella reticulata.12 It appears to me to be
absurd, and unjust to the plant, to call it Tremella reticulata, when it was not
reticulate, because it had been named Corticium, var. reticulatum, when it
never had the most remote resemblance to a Corticium. I took up the matter
with Professor McGinty and he wrote me he would call it Tremella clavarioides,
and I have adopted his name.13

TREMELLA AURANTIA (Fig. 225).— Plant two to three inches

Fig. 225
Tremella aurantia.

n The plant in Saccardo bears the advertisement "Berkeley and Ravenel" but if it is
true that it was so named, the naming was done by Berkeley. Some day we expect to devote
some remarks to the system of advertising in double platoons, nine-tenths of which is a double
fraud. In this case Ravenel had nothing to do with it, not even to pick it up. The plant is
attributed to Michener of Penn. and was sent to Berkeley by Curtis.

12 since this article was written we note that Professor Farlow has taken this view of it.
,Cfr. Rhodora, January, 1908

13 Professor McGinty informs me this was done in accordance with Article 5 of the Rules
of the Poseyville Fungus Forage Club.

" When a new-species-hunter is so careless in his work that he puts a plant in a genus
where it has no possible relationships and gives it a specific name with no application to the
plant, owing to the poor quality of his work it becomes null and void and the plant shall be
placed in the genus where it belongs and a suitable name given to it."

in diameter with thin foliaceous lobes. Color yellow, whitish below.
Spores subglobose, apiculate, 8-10 mic. in diameter, hyaline, smooth.

HISTORY.— It is a rare plant and I have seen it but once. It grew
erumpent from the limb of an oak tree and was collected the latter part of No-
vember. It is much thinner, firmer and more foliaceous than the common
species Tremella mesenterica. I refer it to Schweinitz's name, as it seems to fit
exactly his short description and habits.14 I am not certain, however, that it is
not Tremella frondosa of Europe,13 but Fries (and other European inycologists
to whom I have sent it) saw the American species and considered it distinct.
Besides it does not appear to me to be Bulliard's figure. I have seen in the mu-
seum at Paris quite a different American plant (a species of Dacryomyces) deter-
mined as " Tremella aurantia, Schw." but I think it is an error.

POLYPORUS VIRGINII-CUBONI, N. C.

BY N. J. McGiNTY.

It is held by our leading authorities that whenever one discovers a dupli-
cation of an old name, it is his first duty (to himself) to immediately propose
a new name for one of the plants, notwithstanding he may not know anything
about either of them. In 1836, Berkeley in Vol. 5 of Hooker's English Flora
described a resupinate Polyporus on the bark of fir trees which he named
Polyporus armeniacus. This species was compiled in Saccardo (Vol. 6, p. 127)
as Polyporus armeniacus, Berk. It belongs to the genus Poria, and certainly
not to the genus Polyporus, and I therefore name it Poria armeniaca (Berk-
eley) McGinty. In 1856 Berkeley described in Hooker's Journal, vol. 8,
page 197, a new species collected by Spruce in Brazil under the name Polyporus
armeniacus, n. s., identically the same name he has applied to a British species.
Saccardo has compiled it without change in vol. 6, p. 109, although any date
dictionary would have demonstrated that 1856 is twenty years later than 1836.
I have carefully studied the works of the learned nomenclatorial authority,
Otto Kuntze, and also read the Rochester code (which seems to have been
taken from them), and I" can find in neither any rule justifying an author to
call two entirely different "new species" by identically the same name. I there-
fore change the name of the second Polyporus armeniacus to Polyporus Virginii-
Cuboni, McGinty, in honor of Madame Cuboni, who has rendered mycology
such marked service in translating some English diagnoses into Latin (cfr.
Saccardo Sylloge, vol. 6, p. 199). I regret that I must still include it in the
old genus Polyporus, as my distinguished co-workers have not yet indicated
what new genus is comprised in the section Anodermei Carnosi of Fries' classi-
fication. The synonymy may be indicated as follows :

Poria Armeniaca (Berkeley) McGinty: synonym, — Polyporus armeniacus,
Berkeley, Hooker's English Flora, vol. 5, part 2, 1836, p. 147.

Polyporus Virginii-Cuboni, McGinty : synonym, — Polyporus armeniacus,
Berkeley, Hooker's Journal, vol. 8, 1856, p. 197.

(NOTE. — Our apologies are due to Professor McGinty for delay in printing
the above communication, the copy having been in our hands nearly two years.
In the meantime his " co-workers " have indicated that Fries' section forms the
" new genus " Tyromyces. — C. G. L.)

H The specimen in Schweinitz's herbarium has mostly disappeared, only some very small
fragments left. There still remains the Stereum with which it grew.

15 I do not know Tremella frondosa of Europe, though I know well a plant in this country
that passes for it. Our plant, however, can not be called "pale yellow," and I have always
doubted the reference.

MYCOLOGICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. L-L-OYD.

Polyporoid Issue, No. 1.

CINCINNATI, O. FEBRUARY, 1908.

We begin with this issue a series devoted to the polyporoids of Europe
and America. As yet we have only devoted about a year to their special study, and
Df course there are many questions in connection with the subject that have
not yet been solved. It is needless to say that we shall be conservative and fol-
,ow the established usage in our names and classification. We take no stock
whatever in the exuberance of new names that have been proposed in the last
rew years and shall not bother our readers with them.

POLYSTICTUS (SECTION PELLOPORUS).

The genus Polystictus, as proposed by Fries and adopted gener-
illy by mycologists, is defined by one word — coriaceous. It differs
roni the larger section now known as the true Polyporus in its tex-
ure, being usually thin, flexible, coriaceous or membranaceous.
When fresh it is never soft, fleshy, watery, and when dry it is gener-
.lly more flexible than brittle. Like all characters on which genera
.re based, intermediate species occur that are difficult to place, espe-
:ially from the dried specimens, and the best that can be done in such
ases is to judge from related plants. There are no hard and sharp
ines in Nature.

Fries divided the genus Polystictus into a number of sections,
>ut unfortunately he did not give the different sections distinctive
lames. Had he done so, the expenditure of much gray matter would
lave been saved to the modern name changers, who busy themselves
discovering that the sections of Fries form "new genera" and then
;etting up various pretexts to juggle around the names.

The section under consideration was called by Fries in the main
Perennes" and embraces the Polystictus that have stems either
.lesopodal or pleuropodal and colored context. It can be divided
'generically" of course if one wishes) into "genera" with hyaline
ncl "genera" with colored spores, or into "genera" with colored
etae and "genera" without colored setae, or into "genera" with uni-
:>rm context or " genera " with the dual context.

Karsten, who was the first to engage in discovering " new gen-
ra" in Fries' sections, called this "genus" Polystictus, but the name
> applied to so many plants that it seems to me if advisable to spe-
ially distinguish these sections by separate names the name Polystic-
is should be used for the main section and these smaller ones given
ther names. The next name-juggler to engage in the work was
|uelet who called Fries' section, Perennes, Pelloporus. Since it has
UNIVERSITY 0* CAI IFORKIA

AT LOS A

JAN 2 01942

been called (in part at least) Xanthochrous, Coltriciella and Coltricia.
In fact if you examine the work of any of the modern name changers
you will find them a great deal more prolific in new names than in
new ideas.

SETAE PRESENT.

Colored setae (Fig. 196) are characters found in
many polyporoids and other plants, and generally
such plants have ferruginous context. The presence
or absence of colored setae on the hymenium is read-
ily seen with a low power microscope. They appear

*

ike sharp spines, usually of a deeper color than the
hyphae of the context. They are often called cystidia,
)ut appear to me to be more on the surface than true

but appear to n

cystidia. They have been proposed as a generic
character by Ellis but the idea did not meet with
much favor.1

POLYSTICTUS TOMENTOSUS (Fig.
197). — Pileus thin, plane or depressed, dark
brown, ferruginous color, soft, tomentose, usu-
F'a- 196- ally without zones.2 Context thin, hard, uni-

form. Stipe usually mesopodal, soft, tomen-
tose. Pores small, 3 to mm. short (i mm.)3 covered when young with
a white film. Colored setae abundant.

This species I found abundantly in Sweden. Usually the stipe
is mesopodal, rarely pleuropodal. Many of the specimens are double,
one pileus superimposed above the other as in Fries' illustration of
Schweinitzii. (Icon. T. 179.) My description is drawn from plants
I collected in Sweden, but am not sure but that it is applicable to young
plants only. ( See note 5, page 4).

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Sweden, C. G. Lloyd (abundant.)

Tirol, Rev. Bresadola, Rev. Jaime Pujuila.

POLYSTICTUS CIRCINATUS (Fig 198).— Pileus, thick, plane
or depressed, of a pale, fulvous color, without zones, and with a soft,
velutinate surface. Context double, the lower sub-ligneous, the upper
layer of equal or greater thickness, soft spongy. Stipe often short,
thick, soft spongy, mesopodal, or in northern localities more slender
and usually pleuropodal. Pores at first small, round, becoming large
and more irregular when old, from 2 to 5 mm. long. At first covered

1 1 know from my conversations with Professor Ellis that he took it very much to heart
because the mycological world did not take kindly to his idea of a genus Mucronoporus based
on colored setae in the polyporoids. He said, and said truly, that if colored setae in '.he Thele-
phoraceae make the genus Hymenochaete. why should they not make a genus in the Polypo-
raceae? The reason was that Corticium was a large genus and the presence or absence of col-
ored (and uncolored; setae are the most convenient methods to break it up, while the poly-
poroids have been broken up by Fries on much better and plainer characters.

2 Fries emphasizes the character " azonate " but I found rarely specimens in Sweden that
were distinctly zoned.

3 All my specimens have a thin layer of pores but as I find no spores I suspect all to be
immature. It seems to be a character of all these related plants that the pores when young are
more regular and shallow and increase in length as the plants get older. Hence in young and
old plants the pores appear different.

Fig. 197.

Polystictus tomentosus, and section.

with a white film. Colored setae abundant. Spores pale colored,
3x5 mic.4

HISTORY AND DISTRIBUTION.— A frequent plant in acerous woods in
northern localities. Specimens from Massachusetts are mostly mesopodal with
a short, thick stem. I found it frequent in northern Canada and there it was
more slender and usually pleuropodal. Similar specimens from Colorado are
thinner. It is known as Polystictus circinatus in Peck's work and in Miss
Marshall's book, and probably correctly, though there are a number [of discrep-
ancies between it and European literature. It has smaller spores than the
European plant as I have collected it in Sweden.5 It agrees exactly with Fries'
description (save that his pore description applies only to young plants). It
differs from Polystictus tomentosus exactly as Fries says it does. It does not
agree with his figure ( Icon. T. 180) particularly as to color for it is more yellow
than red, nor does his figure show the dual character of the flesh which he em-
phasizes so strongly in his description.6 The spores are smaller than as stated
by Bresadola (and found by myself ) for the European plant. So taking it all
together there is considerable doubt about it.

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Sweden, C. G. Lloyd ( See Note 5 below.)

Massachusetts, R. B. Mackintosh, Theodate L. Smith, J. W. Huntingtou,
Geo. E. Morris, Miss Cora Clarke, Lincoln W. Riddle: Maryland, W. T. Lakin:
Colorado, Ernest Knaebel : Canada, Thomas Langton, C. G. Lloyd. (One collec-
tion from Mr. Langton, Canada, is young and decidedly more yellow than usual.)

Forms.

As previously stated the plant varies very much from thick obese, short,
central stemmed forms to thinner, more slender pleuropodal stemmed forms, but
I do not believe they can be separated even under distinct, varietal names. They
usually grow in pine woods over pine needles. I have a single collection from J.
W. Huntington, Amesbury, Mass, which seems to be the same species in everything
excepting that the pores are decurrent to the base of the short stem. I think it
is a form, but it grew on "an oak stump" and Polystictus circinatus has no
business to be found in such a situation.

POLYSTICTUS DUALIS (Fig. 199.)— Pileus dimidiate, with a
short, rudimentary stem, fulvous, ferruginous. Surface, soft, velutinate.
Context dual, the lower subligneous, the upper about equal in thick-
ness and soft, spongy. Pores small, subregular, about 2 mm. long, at
first whitish, but soon dark.7 Colored setae abundant, curved. Spores
unknown.8

4 Iii the American plant so referred. In the plants so referred from Europe I find them
7 x 12 mic.

SThe first season I was in Sweden I got a few specimens which I thought were Polystictus
tomentosus The second season I found abundantly what I supposed was the same plant. As
I compare the specimens now I find my first season's collection has the dual context characters
as attributed to P. circinatus by Fries, and my second season's collection a single context as
he defines P. tomentosus. The specimens of first collection are old and those of the second are
all young. I can not decide whether I got different plants or the same plant at different ages.
If I did get the same plant then the dual context is developed as the plant ages and P. circinatus
is an old condition of P. tomentosus.

6 It was described Fr. Monog. p. 268 not page 208 as erroneously stated in Hym. Europe,
and copied by Saccardo.

7 As I remember them the fresh specimens had darker pores, than they are now when dry.
When I collected the plant my first impression was that it was related to adustus.

81 find none in my specimens nor are they noted by Professor Peck.

v x

Fig. 198.
Polystictus circinatus, showing mesopodal and pleuropodal forms

HISTORY. — A rather rare plant I judge, which I know only from the type
at Albany and a single collection that I made in northern Canada. It grows

Fig. 199.
rolystic.us dualis.

only on pine wood and those I found were on the base of a living pine tree. Its
evident relationship to Polystictus circinatus has been acknowledged by Profes-
sor Peck but it is quite distinct and I do not question its claim to specific rank.
It was given as a synonym for Polystictus circinatus by Cooke (who was only
guessing) and so compiled by Mr. Murrill. It does not in reality belong in this
section for Professor Peck finds it usually sessile, belonging to the Apus section.
Although it has little resemblance to Fries' figure and does not agree with his
description, I suspect it will prove to be Polystictus triqueter of Europe. Bresa-
dola gives Polystictus triqueter and circinatus as varieties of the same species,
though Fries does not indicate any relationship and puts them in widely distinct
sections of Polyporus.

PLANTS WITH NO COLORED SETAE. SPORES PALE COLORED.

There are three frequent, small species belonging to the section Perennes
and they have been very badly confused. They are widely different and there is
no occasion for this confusion excepting lack of care on the part of the writers.
All are much smaller, more slender plants than the preceding and have pale col-
ored spores, appearing almost subhyaline under a high power. They are readily
distinguished by the following key :

Color bright cinnamon, Polystictus cinnaniomeus.

Color dull. Pores large, Polystictus focicola.

Color dull. Pores small, Polystictus perennis.

CINNAMOMEUS (Fig. 200)— Pileus thin,
or umbilicate, bright, ferruginous-cinnamon

POLYSTICTUS
coriaceous, depressed

color, subzonate, the surface silky and shiny with appressed radiating
fibrils. Context thin, concolorous, ^ rnm. thick. Stem central, slen-
der, equal, concolorous. Pores small, concolorous, at first shallow but
when mature 2 to 2)^ mm. long. Spores elliptical, smooth, varying
from 5x6 to 6xio mic., pale straw color, pale under the microscope.

HISTORY.— This is not a rare plant in the United States, and is usually
found in rich humus in the woods. In Europe it is very rare. It is small and
slender, the pileus from i^ to 4 cm. in diameter. Many of the collections are

very small. In this country the plant was first collected by Richardson in Brit-
ish America and named by Klotzsch Polyporus parvulus.1' Then Peck discovered

fjf

Fig 200.
Polystictus cinnaraomeus.

it was a new species and named it Polyporus splendens, afterwards changed it
to Polyporus subsericeus. Cooke referred it to a very similar plant of Australia,
Polystictus oblectans.10 The reference of the American plant to the European
was due I think to Rev. Bresadola. At any rate it was a matter of common
knowledge years ago to all of Bresadola's correspondents. Cinnamomeus is a
specific name given by Jacquin, more than a hundred years ago. As a general
rule I do not favor digging up the old names based on old pictures for most of
them are more dubious than true. Jacquin however gave such a correctly drawn
colored picture that I do not see how his work can be ignored, and this is the
only plant known in Europe that agrees with it in any respect. Fries never re-
ferred any plant to Jacquin's picture, and carried it as a doubtful species through
all his works. He balked at the one word " fragilis " in Jacquiu's description, as
Persoon had done before, and he called the plant when he received it from France
Polyporus Montagnei. The co-types in Montague's herbarium are the same as
our American plant. Bresadola has given a very good figure of it in Fung.
Trident, not as bright colored however as our American plant. The coloring of
Ouelet's figure (T. 17) is too yellow and the plant too obese. I think it must be
some other species but know no plant that agrees with it in any degree.

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Europe, Tirol, Rev. G. Bresadola; Prance, L. Ludwig; Italy, Rev. L. Badet.

America, Canada,]. Dearness; Minnesota, Dr. M. S. Whetstone; Michigan,
O. E. Fischer; Massachusetts, Simon Davis, Lincoln W. Riddle, Geo. E. Morris,
R. B. Mackintosh; Maryland, W. T. Lakin; Washington, D. C., Dr. A. Hrdlicha;
New Jersey, E. B. Sterling; Ohio, M. Bubna, C. G. Lloyd; Florida, Mrs. M. A.
Noble, C. G. Lloyd.

POLYSTICTUS PERENNIS (Figs. 201).— Pileus plane or in-
fundibuliform, minutely velvety, becoming smooth, zonate dull cinna-
mon color, often bleaching whitish. Context thin, particularly toward
the margin, concolorous. Stipe central, concolorous, varying from

9 It is not the plant, however, usually called Polystictus parvulus in American mycology.
The name was switched, first due to an error of Fries who referred to it P. com

iiitz and then to a second error of Berkeley who misinterpreted P. connatus. The plant usu-
ally called Polystictus parvulus in American mycology is Polystictus focicola.
was some reason for Berkeley's conclusions for Schwemitz's description of conna
Polvstictus focicola better than the plant from which it wa» drawn. But I see no good excuse
for any one who has seen both Schweinitz's and Klotzsch's types perpetuating this old error.

10 Polystictus oblectans is a similarly colored plant of Australia, very common there I
judge from the number of specimens at Kew. I have it from several collectors It >s a sh.
thicker plant, but in the American plant the fibrils of the pileus are appressed and tht
smooth. In the Australian plant the fibrils in the center of the pileus are ,-rrct and the pile
subsquamous. In addition the spores of the Australian plant are more round being abou

3 to 7 mm. thick and from 2 to 7 cm. long. Pores cinnamon, small,
slightly decurrent, — when young small (4 to mm.) shallow, subregu-
lar, — when old larger, more irregular, somewhat torn. Spores ellipti-
cal, 4-5 x 8-10, smooth, pale colored, (subhyaline under the micro-
scope).

HISTORY. — A frequent plant both in America and Europe. It is the most
common Polystictus of this section that we have. It is somewhat similar to the
preceding species but usually larger, more zonate and can always be recognized
by its dull color.11 It grows in more sandy open places and is not so character-
istically a "woods" species as the preceding. The specific name, perennis, is
attributed to Linnaeus and is really a misnomer, for the plant is not perennial
in the sense that it revives the second season. It often persists over the winter
and the weathered specimens bleach almost white on top. Such specimens
frequently reach me. In common with other related species, Polystictus peren-
nis has the curious habit of growing around and enclosing sticks and blades of
grass etc. when they are in the way of the growing plant. Two or more plants
coalesce if they grow where they touch each other. Such a specimen consisting of
perhaps a dozen united individuals was named Polyporus connatus by Schweinitz.12

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Europe, France, F. Fautrev, L. Rolland, Professor J. Lagarde, C. G. Lloyd :
Germany, Dr. O. Pazschke, Otto Jaap, Professor Kriiger, E. Engelke : England:
E. W. Swanton*: Austria, Ant. Weidmann, E. Wulff, Tirol, Rev. G. Bresadola ,
Belgium, Prof. Ch. Van Bambeke : Italy, M. Bezzi*: Denmark, Rev. A. Breitung:
Sweden, C. G. Lloyd.

America, Canada, James Fletcher, P. L. Ricker, Miss Isabel M. Walker :
Minnesota, Miss Daisy Hone, Dr. M. S. Whetstone : Wisconsin, Chas. E. Brown :
Michigan, H. C. Beardslee, C. G. Lloyd : Vermont, E. A. Burt: New Hampshire,
Miss Kate A. Jones*, Margaret L. Sewall, H. E. Warner, F. L. Sargent: Mass-
achusetts, L. W. Riddle, Geo. E. Morris, Simon Davis*, Missouri, Dr. N. M.
Glatfelter, N. L. T. Nelson*, Pennsylvania, Caroline A. Burgin*: Illinois, H. C.
Beardslee : Washington, D. C., F. J. Braendle. One of Mr. Braendle's collections
is surely perennis but too bright color. The other tends towards focicola.

Forms.

POLYSTICTUS SIMILLIMUS.— This is in my opinion a small, more slender
form with pores not so decurrent. I get it from both Europe and America and
such forms are starred in above list.

POLYSTICTUS PROLIFERUS (Fig. 202). — A curious form (?) or sport,
has been received from M. Bubna, Cleveland, Ohio. It is not perfect, but the
margin of the pileus develops a number of proliferous pilei. The spores, 6x9,
and the texture is more flexible, also color brighter than Polystictus perennis,
but on the scanty material we have we would prefer to consider it as a possible
sport rather than a wonderful " new species."

POLYSTICTUS FOCICOLA (Fig. 203).— Pileus same as Poly-
stictus perennis but usually smaller. Stipe similar. Pores large ( i
mm or more) rather shallow. Spores elliptical, 5 x 10, pale colored,
smooth.

11 One collection I have from F. J. Braendle, Washington, D. C., is bright color but so evi-
dently P. perennis in size and habits and general appearance that notwithstanding its color 1
should without hesitation refer it to perennis. It shows that even the " key " characters some-
times fail.

12 The specimen is still in good condition at Philadelphia. Fries erroneously referred
Schweinitz's species and the error has been copied by every writer on the subject since.

Fig. 201.

Polystictus perennis

HISTORY.— This is practically the same plant as the preceding, having the
same dull color, and appearance and differs only in having larger pores. The

v - -., 7*

i t

Fig. 202.
Polystictus proliferus.

Fig. 203.
Polystictus focicola.

Perennis. Fig. 204.

Contrast of pores enlarged x6. of Polystictus pereuni

Focicola.
id Polvstictus focicola.

extreme forms are marked in the difference in the size of the pores but inter-
mediate forms occur that are hard to refer. It is a southern plant and the most
common form in the South and is not known from Europe. The most northern
station known to me is Brewerton, N. Y.13 It usually grows on burnt ground.
The plant has generally and erroneously been known in American mycology as
Polystictus parvulus (See note 9 p. 7.) based on Berkeley's work. Polystictus
counatus of Schweinitz, also usually referred to it as a synonym is an error (See

13 Mr. Murrill correctly gives its distribution as "confined to states south of Massachusetts"
and then copied the usual error and referred it to Polystictus parvulus which Dr. Richardson
collected in Arctic America.

There is no exact locality on the label, but Richardson was the botanist of the Franklin
expedition to the north pole and collected his plants "from Hudson Bay to the Polar Sea."
Polystictus parvulus was collected without question much nearer the Arctic circle than any
"state south of Massachusetts."

14 Or Polyporus to be accurate, but Polystictus having come into general use for a section
of Polyporus since that date I use the two names in the present sense. The same remark will
always apply to my use or rather non-use of all the recently juggled names. (See Note 2, page
342).

10

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Florida, £. E. Pleas, G. C. Fisher, ( 4 collections,! Mrs. M. A. Noble (?)•'
Tennessee, Mrs. M. S. Percival : Kentucky, C. G. Lloyd: Xew Jersey, T. J. Collins-
Rare and Doubtful Species.

POLYSTICTUS OBESUS.— A thick, obese species with general color and
characters of Polystictus perennis. It is not zonate, however, and the surface is
uneven, with erect, squamose, scales. It is a rare form and I think the type is
the only one surely known. I have a specimen from John Dearness, Canada, that
I think belongs here though Ellis referred it to P. cinnamomeus which it surely
is not. Morgan referred it to P. Montagnei (likewise surely not) and it is the
basis of the record of this species in Morgan's work. I have also two collections,
one from Theodate L. Smith, New Hampshire and the other from Dr. Mary S.
Whetstone, Minneapolis, which I doubtfully refer here. If so, they are young,
thinner, and with larger pores.

Fig. 205.
Polystictus culicularis, wilh an enlargement x 6 showing the relative thinness of the fle»h.

II

POLYSTICTUS MEMMINGERI.— I have not seen and do not know this:
It seems from the description to be a very obese obesus.

POLYSTICTUS CUTICULARIS (Fig. 205).— Pileus plane, smooth, bright
cinnamon color, strongly zonate. Context thin, less than 5 mm.,15 concolorous.
Pores large, 1-2 mm. wide, 3 mm. long. Paler than the pileus. Stipe rather obese,
concolorous, minutely velutinate (2 cm. long, i cm. thick in this specimen.)
Spores 6 x 12-14 mic., pale colored, smooth, lateral apiculate with a large gutta.

Based on a single specimen collected at Wayland, Mass, by Geo. E. Morris.
It is quite different from related plants in this country in its very thin context,
in proportion to the pores, and the spores (lateral apiculate) are different in shape
from all others. Not knowing what it is, I give it a new name in keeping with
custom in such cases. It may be a new species and it may not. I hope some
day to be in a position to say.

POLYSTICTUS DECURRENS (Fig. 206).— Pileus depressed, zonate,
smooth, pale cinnamon color, thin. Stipe slender. Pores long, decurrent, small
regular. Spores elliptical, 4x8 mic., hyaline, smooth, guttate.

Fig. 206.
Polystictus decurrens.

This species is only " known from the type locality." It was collected by
Geo. E. Morris, at Ellis, Mass. It differs from all others in its long decurrent
pores. It is closest to cinuamomeus, but pileus is smoother, not bright color,
more rigid. As to the naming of the preceding plant, the same remarks apply
to this.16

POLYSTICTUS DEPENDENS.— If this is not an anomaly of some kind it
is a very curious thing. It grows pendant, hanging on the under side of pine
branches and logs and the pores (of course) on the under side of it. It might well
be compared to a wasp's nest. In its surface, context, color, pores and general
appearance it is almost the same as Polystictus cinnamomeus excepting in its
manner of growth. It is a small plant about one half inch in diameter and
very rare, being found originally by Curtis in South Carolina and later by Ellis
in New Jersey, who sent his plants to Cooke to be named. At Kew there is also
in the same cover what appears to be the same plant from Africa.

I* Hence the name, for the thin flesh is little more than a cuticle.

16 AS a matter of truth, Jacquin's figure of Polystictus cinnamomeus agrees with Mr.
r and shape better than it does with the plant to which the name is

Morris' plant both in colo:

now applied. At the same time no such plant a

now in Europe.

Fig. 207.
Polysticlus depeudens and the pore surface. Both enlarged 6 diameters.

Since the pamphlet has been in type we were very much pleased to receive
a specimen of Polystictus dependens from G. C. Fisher, Florida. The spores of
the plant are of a much deeper color than those of Polystictus ciunamomeus
and smaller, 5x7 inic. They are elliptical, guttate, smooth. Mr. Fisher's

Elants reached me at an opportune time to present a figure (207) which is an en-
irgement six diameters of the specimen.

SETAE NONE. SPORES PURE WHITE.

POLYPORUS SCHWEINITZII (Fig 208).— Pileus dark brown,
varying much in size and shape, covered with a strigose, matted brown
tomentum. The perfect form is mesopodal. Usually it is pleuropodal
and sometimes apodal. Context brown, soft, spongy when fresh. Soft,
brittle when dry. Stipe usually short and thick, rarely central, usually
excentric, sometimes wanting. Pores decurrent, at first large, meruloid,
shallow, when fresh yellowish, spotting brown when bruised or in
drying, becoming longer (5 mm.) and when old irregular and lacerate.17
Spores pure white in mass,18 elliptical, 4x6, hyaline, smooth.

This is a celebrated plant and has been known (except by a few changers19 )
as Polyporus Sclnveinitzii ever since Fries nearly ninety years ago so named it.
in honor of Schweinitz.20 It is one of those intermediate plants, between Poly-
stictus and Polyporus and has been referred to both. Fries at one time put it in
Polystictus but Cooke and Saccardo in Polyporus. It varies in size from two
inches to a foot in diameter (or even two feet as Mr. Murrill has collected it). It

1" I have received the plant from correspondents sent as a Hyduuin.

IS The English author who states " pale yellow " certainly never collected them.

19If you examine their work you will be impressed with the wonderful unanimity with
which each one of them gets up a different name for it. During the last twenty five years It
has had a new juggled name on an average once every five years.

201 had the pleasure of telling Mr. Romell that it had recently been named in honor of
him. It was news to him, and very amusing, and we had a good laugh over it.

13

grows usually at the base of a pine tree and generally takes a pleuropodal form.
Rarely forms with central stems are found. Sometimes it grows on the trunks
of pine trees and then the stern is lateral or wanting. The forms on trunks have
received several names — Polyporus tabulaeformis21 by Berkeley and Polyporus
hispidioides by Peck, and both of these authors afterwards corrected their work.
Fries named this plant Polyporus spectabilis, according to Cooke's synonym.

Polyporus Sch

Fries gives, I think, a very good picture of it ( Icones T. 179) made from a fresh
plant, but it bothered me for years because I never saw specimens with the con-
trast of colors of the pores and context such as he shows. One must observe the
fresh plant to find that, for in drying the pores become very much the same
color as the context. The marked manner in which the fresh, yellowish pores
turn quickly brown on bruising is a notable character of the fresh plant not
mentioned I think in books.

SPECIMENS IN OUR COLLECTION.

Europe, Denmark, Dr. C. Mundt: Germany, Fritz Noack.

America, Canada, C. G. Lloyd : Massachusetts, J. W. Huntingtou ( who
states "very common"): Minnesota, E. P. Ely: Ohio, Captain Win. Holden:22
Michigan, S. G. Milner : Florida, C. G. Lloyd \ Alabama, A. S. Bertolet.

NOMENCLATURE.— "The nomenclature is in accordance with the best
judgment of the author." The above quotation from a recent catalogue by Edith
M. Farr impresses me as being good common sense. If authors would rely on
their own judgment in selecting names instead of being dictated to by some
"rules" it would be much better. The man who has to conform to "rules,"
formulated by those who knew nothing of his subject, is to be pitied.

21 Incorrectly compiled tubulaeformis in Saccardo, Vol. 6, p. 76.

22 pine is not indigenous around Cincinnati and the discovery of this species near Cin-
cinnati by Captain Holden is of interest, as it is certainly adventitious in this locality.

WHICH IS FOMES NIGRICANS, "FRIES"?

FOMES NIGRICANS.— The fact that there are two very differ-
ent plants referred to Fomes nigricans, " Fries," by different botan-
ists is not generally appreciated.

First, there is a Fomes (Fig. 209) growing very common on

Fig. 209.

birch, which is in reality a form of Fomes igniarius, with a smooth,
black, shining crust.23 It is called Fomes nigricans, " Fries," by
Quelet and Patouillard, and is the plant beautifully shown in the
recent plate by Boudier. I have only collected it on birch, but have
specimens from France, on willow, which are so referred. It has the
same colored context, the same spores (subhyaline, compressed
globose, 5-6 mic.), and has a peculiarity I have often noted in Fomes
igniarius, which was not overlooked in Boudier's plate, though never
mentioned, to my knowledge, in books. The old tubes have a white
deposit (lime, I presume), which shows plainly in a section of the
pileus of Fomes igniarius, but not any other species, to my knowledge.
If this is the true Fomes nigricans of Fries, and I presume it is, then
I should consider it a form of Fomes igniarius, but well worthy of a
name.

Second, there is a Fomes, in reality I think a form of Fomes
fomentarius, which was called Fomes nigricans, "Fries," by Bresadola

28 The type form of Fomes igniarius, as it grows in great abundance on all kinds of fron-
dose trees in Sweden, has a rough, rimose, black crust, very much resembling, in genera
pearance, Fomes rimosus. Last summer I found both forms in northern Canada, the rough
form on poplar, the smooth form in great abundance on birch.

15

(Hym. Hung. Kmet, p. 10), and is so known to some mycologists in
France to-day. I received a beautiful specimen, so named by Monsieur
L. lyudwig, Paris (see Fig. 210, made from the specimen). I also
have a specimen from C. Engelke, Hanover, Germany, and one from
Rev. Bresadola. It is not "Fomes fomentarius, of advanced age and
indurated," as stated by Mr. Murrill, being more distinct, in fact,

m

Fig. 210

from the usual form of Fomes fomentarius than the previous plant is
from Fomes igniarius. It has the same context, long stratified pores
and peculiar pore mouths as Fomes fomentarius, but has a black crust,
strongly concentrically sulcate. I do not question but that it is a form
of Fomes fomentarius, but it is well worthy of a distinct name.

16

MYCOLOQICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. L LOYD.

Polyporoid Issue, No. 2.

CINCINNATI, O. AUGUST, 1909.

THE GENUS FAVOLUS.

Hymenium of large, elongated pores, radiating from the stem.
Spores white. Context fleshy, tough.

The genus Favolus, quite frequent in the tropics, is represented
by but one species in temperate Europe or America. As originally
proposed, it included all the large-pored polyporoids, but is now usu-
ally restricted to species with elongated pores. The large-pored polyp-
oroids with round or hexagonal pores form the genus Hexagona, a
tropical genus.

THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN FAVOLUS AND HEXAGONA.— The
author who proposed Favolus made no distinction, but Fries separated the
original genus Favolus into two genera, one with elongated pores which he
called Favolus, the other with hexagonal pores which he called Hexagona,
and this has been used for eighty years, and accepted by every mycologist
as far as I know (excepting it was juggled as part of the 83%). l

The genus Favolus runs into the agaric series, and the tropical species
sometimes take a lamellate form. The genus Hexagona, on the other hand is
more closely related to Polyporus. Generally speaking Hexagona comprises
"corky-woody" species and Favolus "fleshy-tough" species. A few species with
hexagonal pores but with the usual Favolus context have been placed with
the latter. We should include them in Hexagona, and one species of our
Southern States is affected thereby, viz : Hexagona cucullata.

DISTINCTION BETWEEN FAVOLUS AND POLYPORUS.— Theo-
retically the distinction is large, elongated pores, as previously stated, though
of course it is difficult to exactly specify where the line falls between large
and small pores. In practice, however, dimidiate species or with lateral stems
are called Favolus, while species with equally large, elongated pores with a
central stem are called Polyporus (example, Polyporus arcularius). It would
probably be better to include both in Favolus, though that is not the custom.

FAVOLUS EUROPAEUS (Fig. 256).— Pileus dimidiate, with a
short, lateral stipe. At first covered with reddish, tawny, fibrillose
cuticle, which, as the plant ages, peels away or fades out so that old
specimens are pale or even white. Pores white, large, elongate, radiate.

1 The excuse upon which this contortion act of changing all species of Favolus to Hexa-
gona and all species of Hexagona to Favolus, was based, was that Palisot-de-Beauvois, who
proposed Favolus and included both genera, happened to print a picture of a Hexagona ft*

' fore he printed
taken in the ser
which he printed first. Certainly

oposed Favolus and included both genera, happened to print a picti

re he printed a picture of a Favolus. As the present genera Favolus and Hexagona are i
ken in the sense of Palisot-de-Beauvois, I can not see why it should make any difference
tiich he printed first. Certainly it is not of enough importance to change 218 names.

'7

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 01942

Favolus europaeus is a frequent plant in the United States, usually
on hickory branches. It is a spring plant and found in its best devel-
opment in June, when one often finds very bright specimens. As the
season advances the plants lose their bright cuticle, become pale, and

^

J

Fig. 256.
Favolus europaeus. One with the fibrils partially separated. Also pores (x 6).

are usually eaten by beetles, so that by midsummer the plant generally
disappears from our woods. As we have no other species of Favolus
in our Northern States, it is easily known by the pores. These are
constant, as far as I have observed in the United States, but I have
seen specimens from Italy tending toward Lenzites.

18

In Europe Favolus europaeus is quite rare. It does not occur in England
nor further west than the Alps. In France it is found, rarelv, in the Jura
extending east and south into Italy. It usually grows on Juglans" or Moras.

History.— In Europe it was first noticed by De Candolle and called Merulius
alveolanus.2 Fries called it Favolus europaeus. Two collections reached Europe
from America, both of which were discovered to be new species Klotzsch
found it in Hooker's herbariums and named it Favolus Canadensis. This name
has been largely used in the United States, in fact it is only in recent years
that its identity with the European plant has been unquestioned. Montagne
called it Favolus Ohiensis. Berkeley usually referred our American plant to
Favolus Boucheanus,4 and he also named a "var. peponinus" which is exactly
the type form as far as I can see. American collections referred to Favolus
alutaceus5 are also this plant.

FORMS.

As previously stated, Favolus europaeus which is at first covered with a
bright, reddish cuticle, gradually loses this cuticle and becomes in the end
smooth and white. These are not forms, though likely to be so taken, but are
conditions. One of our figures is an intermediate condition. The following
is, however, a good form.

FAVOLUS MICROSPORUS (Fig. 257).— This is only a small-pored form

Flo. 257
Favolus microsporus and the pores (x6).

of Favolus europaeus, having all the other characters of the type form except
smaller pores. Sometimes I have noticed both forms in the same collection.
The small pored form is much rarer, however.

History. — This small-poreci form has long been known in American my-
cology, and usually considered as a form of europaeus hardly worthy of a
separate name. Professor Peck sent it to Fries thirty years ago, and our
photograph is from his specimen in the museum at Upsala. It was the basis
of Polyporus Boucheanus in Morgan's work. Recently Mr. Murrill discovered

2 I think no one has seen De Candolle's specimens, but his remarks seem to apply to it.
and besides Fries cites it, and it is this plant in the usual date-dictionary sense. I think it
was Quelet that first produced the dates.

3 The specimen is still in good condition, and there are poor specimens at Berlin.

4 He evidently never knew the European species, which does not grow in England. It
has been known for some time that Favolus Boucheanus in the sense of Berkeley was Favolus
europaeus, hence in compilations Favolus Boucheanus, "Klotzsch" is often given as a syno-
nym. Klotzsch's plant has no resemblance whatever to Favolus europaeus, and in the usual
classification is not even a Favolus. It is a Polyporus closely related to Polyporus squamosus.

5 Whether the original Favolus alutaceus from Brazil is the same as europaeus or not, I
would not say, but to me the types look to be very close. Those so named from the United
States are surely the same as europaeus. I should add that on one occasion I made a collec-
tion near Cincinnati, which was young and in good condition, and which was yellowish, with-
out any reddish color, which we always associate with europaeus in its prime. It grew on
oak, I think; at any rate, I took it for Favolus europaeus, modified probably by a different host.

' 19

it was a "new species" and named it Favolus microsporus. Then he discovered
it was not, as Ellis had named it Favolus striatulus.6 As the name micro-

~ *

Fig. 258
Favolus brasiliensis.

sporus is so much better name for the plant we adopt it. Plants suffer so much
from the names of the "new-species" discoverers that it is only fair that their
work should occasionally lead to a better name for a plant.

6 Mr. Murrill's second discovery was probably only that Ellis had published it.
20

FAVOLUS BRASILIENSIS (Fig. 258).— Pileus white, smooth,
but marked with striate lines on the upper surface. Stipe eccentric,
usually well developed, and marked with the decurrent pores. Pores
elongated, alveolate, white.

This species is quite common in Brazil, judging from the number
of collections in the museums. In the United States it occurs only
in the South and is unusual there. It is best known from the collec-
tions of Rev. Langlois in Louisiana. At Kew there are specimens
from Texas collected by Wright.

History. — Fries named the plant from Brazil, and gave a fairly good picture
of it. He also referred here an old name, Merulius daedaleus of Link, which
comes in handy for juggling purposes.

Particularly as the evidence points to the conclusion that Link's plant had
not the slightest relationship to Favolus brasiliensis and does not even belong
to the genus Favolus. The plant is abundant in the museums of Europe,
always under Fries' name.

THE GENUS HEXAGONA.

The genus Hexagona is a very common tropical genus, unknown

Fig. 259.
Hexagona cucullata (natural size and pores x 6).

from temperate regions. It has large, round or hexagonal pores, hence
the name. They may well be compared to a honey-comb. The text

of the tropical species is usually "corky-woody," persistent, and in the
original diagnosis this was part of the generic character. Under this
definition we have no true Hexagona in the United States, our South-
ern species with hexagonal pores being of a tough, fleshy nature.
For that reason perhaps it has always been classed as a Favolus,
though it seems to me its logical place is in the genus Hexagona.7

HEXAGONA CUCULLATA (Fig. 259).— Pileus orbicular
reniform, attached by a very short disk-like stem. Surface smooth,
even; when fresh, Mars yellow; when old, deeper reddish brown.
Pores concolorous, orbicular, a scant mm. wride, shallow.

History/ — A rare plant in the southern states. I have only received a
single specimen from G. C. Fisher, Florida. At Kew there are three specimens,
though I think but one collection, from Ravenel, South Carolina. The fresh
plant is of a much lighter color than these old specimens. Montague named
it Favolus cucullatus from Cuba, and gave a good illustration of it. It was
referred to Favolus from its context nature, not its pore shape, which does
not agree with Favolus. Berkeley also discovered it was a new species, Favolus
curtipes — and then he discovered that it was not. Then Mr. Murrill discovered
it was a new species, Favolus Taxodii — and then he discovered it was not.
I received it from Mr. Fisher and while I thought it was a new species I
thought it would be better to learn a few of the old ones before announcing it.

SOME NOTEWORTHY POLYPOROIDS.

We shall present some of our most remarkable polyporoids that
deviate from the usual run of these plants. Most of them form "new
genera" for those who see a genus in every species out of the ordinary.

POLYPORUS RHIPIDIUM (Fig. 260).— Pileus dimidiate,
scattered or imbricate, with a short, usually dilated stipe, smooth,
white, becoming reddish with age. Pores round or somewhat irreg-
ular, rather large, with thin dissepiments.

This species was originally described from Ohio (Lea),8 but it
is a rare plant; at least I have never found it in its "type locality."
I think, however, that Professor Morgan did find it at Cincinnati.
Generally it is i to \l/2 cm. in diameter, with a short, broad, dilated
stem that gives it a general resemblance to Panus stipticus.9 Our
photograph (Fig. 2606) represents an unusually large specimen. The
type collection, as well as others we have seen, are not larger than
we have noted.

7 This section of Hexagona with tough flesh context will some day be discovered to be
a "new genus." I know four species now that belong to it: Hexagona cucullata, Hexagona
indurata, known from a single specimen from San Domingo; Hexagona bipindensis, of
Africa, and a species, pure white, that I collected in Samoa, for which I have not yet been
able to find a specific name, and think it has none.

8 Though a well-known American plant, Polyporus Rhipidium is not included in the re-
cently published N. A. F., which states that it will include all American plants excepting those
cultivated only. The author probably thought it was cultivated. Either that or it was lost in
the juggle.

9 The name Rhipidium means fan-shaped.

22

Fig. 260
Polyporus rhipidium.

Fig. A, type form x 6. B, same, a cluster. C and D, form subpulverulentus x 6.
E, the small tropical form photographed in Samoa.

23

The curious feature about Polyporus rhipidium is its change of
color with age. This has never been published, I believe. When
fresh it is white,10 but first turns yellowish and then with age it turns
reddish. This seems to be due to some chemical principle, and I know
but one other Polyporus with such a character, viz. Polyporus con-
fluens. A very similar change takes place in Hydnum septentrionale
and related species.

Berkeley always called the plant Polyporus Rhipidium, though
it is found in Saccardo (vol. 6, p. 397) as Favolus Rhipidium, at-
tributed to Berkeley.11 Also in Vol. 9 as Gloeoporus Rhipidium on
Spegazzini's authority. It does have some resemblance to a Favolus
but none whatever to the character of a "Gloeoporus." In my opinion,
it is best classed as a Polyporus for it does not have the pores of
a Favolus.

FORMS.— This species departs from the usual order in taking its most
luxuriant forms in temperate regions. In the tropics it takes usually a very
minute little form rarely over y^ a cm. in diameter. The stipe of this tropical
form is not dilated as it usually is in the temperate region form. In addition,
the little tropical form grows scattered. In the temperate regions it is imbricate.
At first view it would seem to not be the same species, but with the same
context, pores, and peculiar color changes and many connecting sizes, I do not
question it is the same species. No name has been published for this little
tropical form, though it might well have one. It is widespread and at Kew
specimens are found from Ohio, North Carolina, Paraguay, Australia, Bonin
Island, Ceylon, Brazil, Cuba, Venezuela, Mexico, and New Zealand, and all, I
think, correctly named, though all except those from the United States are the
small form. In addition, I have collected it in Samoa. The first specimen to
reach Europe is found in Persoon's herbarium at Leiden. It was from the
West Indies. Persoon labeled it Polyporus pusillus, but never published it.

POLYPORUS SUBPULVERULENTUS.— A rare form in warm regions
is pulverulent or rather slightly tomentose. Our figure 260, C and D, is this
form (enlarged X6). I have collected it in Florida.

POLYPORUS VOLVATUS (Fig. 261).— A Polyporus that
conceals its pores by a thick membrane is a distinct departure from
the usual order and well merits being called a "new genus."12 Since
the day that Professor Peck published and illustrated this curious
growth it has been a celebrated plant. It grows in our Eastern States
"plentifully" in the spruce forests, and Professor Peck states that
it usually proceeds from a perforation of the bark caused by a beetle.

10 Or perhaps yellowish, I do not know. I have only collected the small tropical form,
and that, when fresh, is white. Polyporus Rhipidium was first described as "yellowish," and
all the freshly dried specimens I have seen of the large form are yellowish.

11 This change should have been attributed to Cooke, for Berkeley always called it
Polyporus, and every specimen in his herbarium is so named.

12 It was so suggested by Professor Peck shortly after he published it, but Professor
Peck has always been conservative in making new genera. Instead of calling it a new genus
he called it a "section Cryptoporus." It remained for Shear, of Washington, to discover that
it was not a section, but a genus, and thus add his name to it.

24

It also seems to be frequent in our Western forests (California)
there growing on Pinus contorta, and Professor Peck has found it
at Albany on Pinus rigida. It is probably restricted to coniferous
wood.

Polyporous volvatus is an annual plant and short lived, for it
is usually destroyed by beetles early in the season.13 The form is
globose, or compressed, as shown in our illustration. At first it is a

Fig. 261.

Polyporus volvatus.
The larger are the Western form, the smaller the "type" form.

hollow ball with a posterior opening below.14 Then the pores are
developed in the interior on the upper side. The context is white and
homogeneous. I think it is misleading to describe the "volva" as a
prolongation of the margin of the pileus. The "piletis" is rather a
hollow globe with the context slightly thicker above than below. The
surface of the pileus is smooth, the upper portion colored with a
reddish brown resinous stain.15 The pores are small, slightly darker

13 Notwithstanding that it was arranged by Cooke in "Fomes" and is found in Saccardo
"Fomes volvatus," Mr. Murrill puts it in "Fomiteae." Its nature is the antithesis of

Fomes and Fomiteae, and,
to Polyporus betulinus.

puts
ted out

by both Peck and Patouillard, its relations are close

14 We read that the "volva at length ruptures at one to three points," etc. I think there
is no rupture. The hole is formed when the "volva" is. It is a definite, well formed aperture,
and exists, I believe, from an early stage. I have one collection so young that no pores are
yet formed, but the aperture is perfect. And I think it is a definite, single aperture. I have
never feen a species with more than one opening. Specimens are recorded, as for instance
Ellis' "new species" Polyporus inflatus, without an opening, but that is evidently due to
growing on top of a log, an abnormal position. When the plant grows normally on the side
of a trunk, as it generally does, the hole is developed as the plant develops.

a In a young collection I have, this stain is uniform over the entire surface, but in old
collections it seems to disappear from the under surface.

than the context and have darker mouths.16 Spores are oblong,
4x 12 mic., hyaline, smooth.

FORMS. — I think there are no forms worthy of separate names. The
usual Eastern form is almost globose and about a cm. in diameter, but the
same form occurs also in the West, and the type of Polyporus obvolutus from
California was of this nature. In the West there is also a larger, more robust
form which we also illustrate.17 It is generally compressed, globose. This
larger form is called in Saccardo (incorrectly) "var. obvolutus," and by
Hennings "var. Helix," and by Patouillard, from China, "var. pleurostoma."
All are exactly the same as our Western form. (It grows also in China and
Japan, and I have a collection from A. Yasuda from the latter country.) The
first collection that was found in the Torrey herbarium, from "Sandy Desert,
California," had a short stipe and was called "var. Torreyi." I think the plant
normally is always sessile, and this stipitate "form," I think, was due to growing
in some abnormal position.

HISTORY.— Professor Peck named the plant, but he did not collect it
first. There was a collection in the Torrey herbarium, part of which was
sent to Upsala (probably during the latter part of Fries' life) but it was not
named. It was sent by Gerard and endorsed "in sandy deserts, California,"18
The history of the plant in Europe was so carelessly made that it probably
should not be told in plain English. The usual way of arranging a lot of
Latin names in a row, which is the plan adopted to hide the truth, would
perhaps be better. Berkeley never saw the plant while he was engaged in the
work, but the species first reached Cooke from Harkness. Cooke did not
know it, but sent it to Berkeley, who named it "Polyporus evolvens, B. & Cooke."
Cooke probably noted that the name was preoccupied10 and published it under
the name Polyporus obvolutus (Grev. 7, p. i) and gave a "description."20
Fortunately it happened that Professor Peck, who gave a full account and
illustration "saw it first", about a year before this "work" was done in Europe.
Otherwise I suppose we would have had learned date dictionary arguments
advanced as to why we should not use volvatus as a name on account of a
"prior description."

POLYSTICTUS PINSITUS (Fig. 262).— Pileus thin, flexible,
tough. Context white. Surface densely velutinate with appressed, fine
hairs. Color varying from light cervine to dark seal brown. Pores
pale or sometimes dark, large, shallow, with thin, angular, denticulate
edges.

Polystictus pinsitus is a frequent plant in tropical America and the West
Indies. There are specimens at Kew from New Orleans (type of Polyporus
sericeo-hirsutus), North Carolina, Brazil (several), Cuba (many), Mexico,
Guadaloupe (a very brown specimen). It seems, however, to be confined to

16 Professor Peck described the mouths as cinnamon brown, but in the Western form
they are dark brown, or rather fuliginous.

17 In our illustration the larger specimens are the Western form, from A. J. Hill, British
Columbia, and the smaller specimens are the Eastern form.

"Further account of this collection is given by Professor Peck, Bull. Torr. Club,
vol. vii, p. 104.

19 Berkeley had applied the same name to a Brazilian plant.

20 The following is the full description as published: "Scarcely exceeding an inch in
diameter and two-thirds as thick." It was brief, but strongly "descriptive."

26

America." The only other specimen I have seen that approaches it is a col
lection from Madagascar which I would refer here as a'form although i is
pale and different from all American specimens. It varies in color from
pale brown to dark brown, but no more than any other similar species, such

Fig. 262.

Polystictus pinsitus.

as Polystictus hirsutus. Its peculiar character is the pores. I know no other
species with such pores. They are broad in proportion to the depth, and
for this reason have been classed as Hexagona. Indeed, in Saccardo it is
found both in Hexagona and Polystictus.22 The pores vary in 'size even in

21 The following other records are printed: India and New Zealand, both based on
species abundantly different. Mauritius, based on an error of labeling. Taken from Hook-
er's herbarium, where it is found only from Cuba. Manila, Sarawak, Borneo, and Algeria.
I do not know as to the last-named, but the three preceding are errors due to referring here

Polystictus dermatodeus, as a synonym.

22 If I were engaged in hunting for "new genera" in the polyporoids, I should surely
find one here, for few other Hexagona or Polystictus have such pores. They are as large as
the pores of other "Hexagonas," such as tenuis, but are irregularly angular, thin, while the
character of the "small"-pored Hexagonas is the regularity of the pores.

27

the same collection-3 (cfr. our figures 263 the large and small pores made
from the same collection). They are always more or less irregular.24

HISTORY.— The plant first reached Fries from Brazil and was called
Polyporous pinsitus. Then he put it in the genus Polystictus, where it is
usually found in recent works. Then it was described by Klotszch, from New
Orleans, as Polyporous sericeo-hirsutus, which Fries changed to Hexagona
sericea.25 Later Fries described a pale form from Southern United States as

Fig. 263.
Polystictus pinsitus pores, x 6.

Polystictus barbatulus. Specimens of Hexagona Friesiana, as named by Spegaz-
zini, are identically the same. (He has since acknowledged it.) The plant
is said to have other synonyms, and it undoubtedly has, but I have not looked
them up. Such a frequent plant in the tropics must have been discovered
to be a "new species" on many occasions.26

POLYPORUS ELLISII (Fig. 264).— Pileus when fresh sul-
phur-yellow, with large, dense, fasciculate warts.27 Flesh when fresh
white, about half an inch thick. In the dried specimen it is compact,
firm, and slightly discolored. Pores when young white, angular, de-
current. When old about a third of an inch long, angular, sinuate,
or somewhat irpicoid. Color of fresh pores said to be white, changing
to greenish when wounded. In the dried plant they are much darker
than the pileus. Spores (teste Underwood) oval, 6x9, smooth.

23 The distinction between "barbatulus" and "sericeo-hirsutus," as pointed out, that the
former has larger pores than the latter, has no foundation.

24 There is no basis for the statement that '
pores than "sericeo-hirsutus" of Southern United

25 As found in Saccardo, vol. 7, p. 363.

26 I do not know

pinsitu;-
States.

jf the tropics

rregulai

26 I do not know who started the story, but it is stated in Saccardo that Polyporus der-
matodes, as named and illustrated by Leveille in "Gaudichaud's Voyage," is the same. It is
an error, for it has little resemblance to it, and belongs to a different section with colored
context.

The first specimen of Polystictus pinsitus that reached Europe was called by Swartz,
Boletus villosus, and is found in Saccardo as Polystictus villosus. Years ago Berkeley pub-
lished that it was the same, and Swartz's specimen in the British Museum fully confirms it.
The date dictionary experts seem to have missed it.

27 These

ious plate-like warts

ind me in a general way of
28

This is one of our rare species of a Southern type. I have never received
it from a correspondent. There are two collections in Cooke's coLc ion
The first came from Ellis, a young specimen, with notes sent to Cookt
was described under the firm name of "Cooke & Ellis,"" but as it was named
for one of the firm they wrote "Berkeley" after it.™ Jt seems that afterward
a specimen reached Cooke from Ravenel." This was much better developed
with long pores (5 mm. long) si that reach to the very base of the stipe" Some

Fig 264.
Polyporus Ellisii.

years later the plant was collected in Alabama and discovered by Underwood
to be a "new species" and called Polyporous flavo-squamosus, which would
have been a much better name for it. Underwood gave the best description
that was given of it. We think these three collections are the only ones known.
It is one of the most strongly marked species that I have seen.

Our illustration is made from a section of a plant in Cooke's herbarium,
which he received from Ravenel, and shows the pores extending to the very
base of the plant. I have never received the plant from any collector, and I
hope my southern correspondents will watch for it.

28 It is needless to say this was before they had their quarrel.

29 There is no evidence that Berkeley had anything to do with it. It was published sev-
eral years after he had quit publishing, and is not found in his herbarium.

30 At least it is indorsed by Cooke, "Rav'l No. 877," but there is no specimen in Ra-

venel's herbarium.

31 In the original description they were from a young plant and were described as a
line deep.

32 Said to be subdecurrent in N. A. F.

THE GENUS PTYCHOGASTER.

This is not a genus, or rather it is a spurious genus. It is well
known now to be the conidial condition of various polyporoids. The
genus was first set forth by Corda in his Icones, 1838, but as a species
supposed to belong to the same genus was named Ceriomyces Fischeri,
also by Corda in the previous year, the latter name has been taken up
in Saccardo.33 In mycology generally, however, the name for the
genus is Ptychogaster.

Corda thought that the genus was allied to the Myxomycetes, and
I think Fries was the first to publish that it was a monstrosity of a
Polyporus.34 Tulasne gave a good account and figure of its struc-

Fig. 265.
Ptychogaster albus and section of

ture and considered it not a fungus "perfect and complete," but did
not account for its origin. Since Tulasne's day a number of species
have been found and the direct connection with species of Polyporous
has in several instances been established.33 The genus Ptychogaster
usually does not have a porous structure. It consists simply of fila-
ments bearing in abundance conidial spores. While it sometimes

33 By this method he added his name to all but one of the European species in his work.
It is very much the same cheap method of changing that Saccardo (wisely) ignores when
indulged in by American mycologists. The name Ceriomyces, drawn from a honey-comb, has
little application to the usual species.

14 In 1846 he announced that Ptychogaster was "monstrosa progenies" of Polyporus
borealis.

31 There exists in Fries's herbarium a specimen which is part Polyporus borealis and part
Ptychogaster. It was sent by Rev. Stevenson, of Scotland.

presents the form of the normal species, it is often so modified that
it is Difficult to trace the connection. It is generally recognized tha
Ptychogaster is a modification or a conidial form' of a Polyporus
but I have seen no explanation or theory to account for it.

PTYCHOGASTER ALBUS (Fig. 265).-All species of Ptycho-
gaster are rare, but this is the most frequent and best known f have
collected it several times in Sweden, but it is reported rare in 'England
and France. 1 do not know it from the United States, where it has
been recorded by Peck.

When young it is white and soft and has somewhat the appearance
of a Spumaria. Its form is usually nearly globose, and the surface
is pubescent with the projecting fibrils. When broken open it is
found to consist of soft fibrils, powdery with abundant, conidial spores.
These spores are globose, hyaline, smooth, very small, about y. mic.
in diameter, I judge. When old the plant becomes brownish.

Fig. 266.
Ptychogaster hepaticus x 6.

I found the plant several times in Sweden, but never saw any connection
between it and Polyporus borealis, and had I not known it to be a conidial
form I should never have suspected any connection. Why Fries first reached
this conclusion I do not know.30 I have never seen them growing together;

36 One author, Ludwig, claims that Ptychogaster albus is a form of "its own proper
species," which he calls Polyporus Ptychogaster, as found in Saccardo. I think no one else
believes it. The statement by Berkeley that Fries considered it a monstrosity of Polyporus
destructor is an error, for Fries referred it to Polyporus borealis.

31

in fact, it seems to me they occur on different conditions of the host. Polyporus
borealis is a most abundant species in Sweden, covering the logs and stumps
of Abies. Ptychogaster grows on the same host, but only on very rotten wood
when it is in the last stage of decay. This may be the explanation of it, that
when there is abundant food material for the plant it produces the normal
form, but after it has exhausted the food material then it turns into the
conidial form. This is contrary, however, to the general rule, by which conidial
forms come first.

PTYCHOGASTER HEPATICUS (Fig. 266).— We gave an
account of Fistulina hepatica on page 6 of Old Species Series, but at
that time we were not acquainted with the conidial form. It is said
to be quite common in connection with the normal form, but we have
seen it but once (sent by E. B. Sterling, New Jersey). It has little
resemblance to Fistulina hepatica.37 It forms a solid, compact ball. A
section shows a mottled appearance (Fig. 266) due to the changed
condition of the tubes. The spores are very abundant, hyaline, smooth,
and very irregular as to size. They vary from almost globose 4x5
to elliptical 5 x 10.

NOTELETS.

A LARGE POLYPORUS GIGANTEUS.— Monsieur Maurice Barbier in-
forms me of the collection at Dijon, France, of a specimen of Polyporus
giganteus weighing nine kilogrammes (about 18 pounds).

THE SCLEROTIUM OF POLYPORUS UMBELLATUS.— It has been
published by Bommer, and it is known in France, that the rare Polyporus um-
bellatus is developed from an underground sclerotium. I was first so in-
formed by Professor Patouillard, and have before me a letter from Monsieur
Maurice Barbier which mentions it. I hope the next one of my correspondents
who finds this rare plant will dig it up and dry it with the sclerotium attached.
I have only collected the plant once, and was not then aware that it had a
sclerotium.

IS IT PERENNIAL? — Among the many errors that pass current in
European mycology is the statement that Polyporus lucidus is a "Fomes". It is
so found in Saccardo and was so placed in Cooke's synopsis. That it is not a
"Fomes", however, I think every one who has observed this plant will testity, at
least all I have asked. Persoon wrote very clearly on the subject,' a hundred
years ago, stating that while sometimes found semi-persistent in the spring
months, it does not revive. That it is not a perennial and not a Fomes, I think
there is no question.

It has been well known for years that our American plant is an annual.
More than ten years ago I heard rumors that it must be a different species
from the European "because it is annual and not a Fomes". It is only very
recently that it blossomed out as a "new species". That, however, is another
story.

37 We were unable to name the specimen until Patouillard recognized it.

MYCOLOQICAL NOTES.

BY C. G. L-LOYD.

Polyporoid Issue, No. 3.

CINCINNATI, O. AUGUST, 1910.

ADDITIONAL NOTES ON POLYPOROID ISSUE No. 2.

It seems that we were a little late in prophesying that the fleshy section of
Hexagona would some day be discovered to be a "new genus." It develops that
this has already been done.

Also we learn that Polyporus Rhipidium (Fig. 357) is a genus of Aga-
rices. That may explain why it was not included in North American Flora.
The author may have taken it for an agaric. It
looks to me about as much like an agaric as does
Daedalea quercina, which we were at one time in-
formed was the "nomenclatural type of the genus
Agaricus" (sic).

We have learned a little additional history of
Polyporus Rhipidium at Paris. It develops that Le-
veille's type of "Gloeoporus pusillus" is the same
plant. It is a miserable little remnant that has never
been recognized since Leveille "described" it sixty
years ago. I have seen it often, and while well

acquainted with Polyporus Rhipidium I have never

Pig 357 recognized it, and probably never would if I had

(Enlarged 6 x ) n°t traced its connection to Persoon's specimens at

Leiden (cfr. p. 24). I have not looked up the

"dates," but it may prove of interest to the date experts. Nothing seems to
give them so much pleasure as to change a name such as Polyporus Rhipidium
that has been universally used for many years, and I hope this discovery may
prove of service to them.

I present here a figure (358) of the stalked form of Polyporus volvatus,
called "var. Torreyi." It was the first collection known and the figure is made

from a specimen in Fries' herbarium. As
I have previously stated I consider it prob-
ably an abnormal development of a "stipe."
As will be noted the "volva" has been
broken away from this specimen.

Additional synonyms" have developed
for Polystictus pinsitus. Polyporus tener
and Polyporus gibberulosus, as named by

Fi 358 Leveille, are both in my opinion this plant.

I have seen in the collection of Professor

Patouillard a specimen which Ellis sent him as Hexagona vittata. It is Poly-
stictus pinsitus. We use the name Polystictus pinsitus in its usual sense,
a very common species in the tropics, with dark pores. It was originally named,
by Swartz from Jamaica, Polystictus villosus, but the Friesian name is gener;
applied to it. Still Fries states that Polystictus pinsitus has white pores and
develops that there is a form in Brazil (whence the plant was named) with whi
pores. It may be better to restrict the name Polystictus pmsit
pored form.

33

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

TWO MAMMOTH POLYPOROIDS.

When I was at Leiden recently, I saw in the Rijks Herbarium two
of the largest polyporoids I have ever seen. It may be that larger ones
grow in the tropics somewhere, but I am sure that none larger have
ever been sent to Europe. I was not familiar with either of them, but
when I went to Kew I found that one of them had been named Poly-
porus talpae by Cooke, from Brazil, and Bresadola informed me that
the other has been called Fomes pachyphloeus at Paris.32

I am under special obligations to Dr. J. W. C. Goethart for the
photographs (Figs. 360 and 361) that we present. They are, of course,
much reduced, and alone would give an inadequate idea of the mam-
moth size of these plants.

•X !'' \.-\\~

Fig. 359.
Cut arranged to show relative size of Fomes pachyphloeus and Polyporus talpae.

It is not easy to appreciate the large size of these two specimens
from a description, and the photographs of the bare specimens tell
nothing as to size. We have therefore introduced them (photographed
to relative size) into a comic street scene in Paris, which by contrast
will give a better relative idea.

32 It was described by Bresadola from Africa, Bull. Soc. Myc., vol. 6, p. XLI, from a
specimen "15 to 17 cm." broad, which was evidently a pigmy compared to the specimen at
Leiden, which is 250 cm. broad, or a hundred times as large in cubical contents.

34

Fig. 360.
Polyporus talpae Much reduced., Photograph by Dr. Goethart.

Homes pachyphloeus much reduced . Photograph by Dr. Goelhart.
35

POLYPORUS TALPAE (Fig. 360).— Dimensions: Circumfer-
ence, 230 centimeters (7 2-3 feet) ; greatest breadth, 70 centimeters
(zl/2 feet) ; weight, dry, 9 1-3 kilograms (20 Ibs. 6 oz.). It must have
weighed more than fifty pounds when it was fresh. The specimen
came from Paramaribo, Dutch Guiana. Polyporus talpae was orig-
inally sent to Europe by Glaziou, from Brazil. It belongs in the section
Merisma with Polyporus giganteus of Europe, which is a pigmy com-
pared to this plant. The surface is dull, minutely velutinate, and is
soft to the touch, and the name, referring to a mole skin, is not bad.
The context is pale, and the pores small and cinereous in the dried
specimen. The spores are hyaline,33 globose, 8 mic., and minutely
rough. In its habits of growth and general appearance the plant is
close to Polyporus Berkeleyi, of the United States, and the spores also
indicate a relationship.

FOMES PACHYPHLOEUS (Fig. 361 ) .—Dimensions : Great-
est breadth, 150 centimeters (5 feet) ; thickness, 20 centimeters (8
inches) ; weight, 2oj4 kilograms (44^/2 Ibs.). The specimen reached
the Rijks Herbarium from Java.

Fomes pachyphloeus was described by Bresadola from Africa,
and this Javanese specimen has been determined by him. It has fer-
ruginous context and abundant, colored setae on the hymenium. The
spores (teste Bresadola) are globose, 3-5 mic., pale yellow. The plant
would therefore come in the same section as Fomes Everhartii, which
grows on the oak in the United States.

OTHER LARGE POLYPOROIDS.

POLYPORUS BERKELEYI (Figs. 362 and 363).— This is the
largest Polyporus that we have in the United States, and I have seen
specimens two and a half feet across the pileus. We have a specimen
in our museum from E. B. Sterling, Trenton, New Jersey, of the fol-
lowing dimensions when fresh :

Circumference, 8 feet 9 inches.
Length, 3 feet.
Width, 2 feet 2^ inches.
Height, i foot I inch.
Weight, 43 Ibs.

It usually grows at the base of a stump or tree, and our figure (362)
will give a good idea of its habits as well as size on comparison with
the tree behind it. The pileus consists of a number of imbricate pile-
oli arising from a short, thick stem or root stock. The surface is pale,
dull, slightly tomentose, and obscurely zoned. The flesh, from one-
half an inch to an inch thick, is white, becoming wood color in old
specimens. When dry it is brittle. The pores are large, unequal, white,

33 They were described as "fulvis" by Hennings, but I am sure they are hyaline in his
specimen. Glaziou also sent this same plant to Berlin, which Hennings discovered was a
"new species" and sent a description to Saccardo. He called it "Polyporus Glaziovii," hut
Cooke "saw it first."

36

37

with angular mouths. The spores are globose, hyaline, about 8 mic.
in diameter, and distinctly echinulatc. It is the only Polyporus we
have, I think, in the United States with echinulatc spores. Our photo-
graph presents figure 362, a plant in situ much reduced, and figure 363
a small pileolus almost natural size.

History. — The plant first reached Berkeley from Lea, Ohio, and was named
on the label Polyporus Anax, but not published. Then Curtis sent it to Berkeley
and also to Fries35 and Fries named it Polyporus Berkeleyi. Berkeley did not
seem to have been overwhelmed with the honor for he did not change the name
on the label and the next time he received it he discovered it was a "new
species" and called it Polyporus subgiganteus. Berkeley knew that the plant
he had labeled Polyporus Anax was the same Fries had named Polyporus
Berkeleyi, for he endorsed both names on the Curtis Mss. notes, but years later
when he summarized the North American fungi in Grevillea he had forgotten
it as he included the plant in Grevillea under his own Mss. name, Polyporus
Anax. Years later Cooke discovered that "Polyporus Anax'' had not been
"described" and supplied the oversight.

Our American mycologists had almost as much trouble with it. Professor
Peck solved it in the usual way by discovering that it was a "new species"
on two occasions (Polyporus Beatiei and Polyporus lactifluus). Ellis probably
got the name from Cooke as he distributed it as Polyporus Anax (2d series,
No. 1595). Morgan3" got it right, and I judge it was from Fries' publication
that he reached this conclusion. This was all done before I began the study.
There has been no confusion concerning Polporyus Berkeleyi since I can re-
member. Even Ellis had it right during the latter part of his life.

EUROPEAN ANALOGUE.

POLYPORUS MOXTANUS (Fig. 364).— The question now to
be solved is whether or not Polyporus montanus, as named by Quelet.
from the Jura regions of France, is the same as our American species.
It is very close and has about the same context and color and the same
peculiar spores. It is a smaller plant, and the only specimen I ever
received (from E. Woulff. Austria) was more regular and meso-
pcclal, if I remember correctly.37 Quelet figured it as fan-shaped, with
a lateral, short stipe. It is a rare plant in Europe and very rare in
the museums. All that I know are two collections at Berlin.3" Quelet
first referred the plant to Polyporus acanthoides,™ and both the speci-
mens in the museum at Berlin were so referred originally. I would
net say that Polyporus montanus is exactly the same plant as Berkeleyi,

M I do not know whether this specimen came to Fries direct from Curtis or through
Berkeley. I judge, from the name Fries gave it, it was through Berkeley.

36 Morgan's error in determination of "Polyporus Anax" has already been explained, and
I will not repeat it here. (Cfr. Myc. Notes, p. 341.)

37 At this writing I can not find the specimen.

34 These two collections at Berlin are, one from "Neuchatel. by Morthier," the other
"Saxony, Krieger." Both were originally labeled "Polyporus aeanthoides, Bull."

which

Fig. 363
Polyporus Berkeley!. A small pileolus. natural size.

39

y

but it is close and unquestionably the European analogue of it. It
seems to be a smaller, more regular plant than its American cousin.

Foreign Related Species.

Notwithstanding the vast amount of name juggling that is going on in
this subject, very little is really known of the foreign polyporoids. As the cuttle
fish employs his ink to cloud the water and disguise his whereabouts, so does the
name juggler use his art to conceal how little he really knows.

Fig. 364

Polyporus montanus.

Polyporus Berkeleyi is supposed to only occur in the United States. When
the truth is learned it will be found in many other countries, or forms that
are very close to it. At Kew there are three foreign collections, all having
the same general characters and the same peculiar spores as Polyporus Berke-
leyi. These are Polyporus Dickinsii from Japan, Polyporus eurocephalus
from Ceylon, and Polyporus Zelandicus from Australia. The latter is thinner,
tougher, and has the general appearance of Polyporus giganteus, but how the
two former differ from Berkeleyi I would not like to state on the evidence
of the small fragmentary pileoli by which they are represented.

40

SOME NOTEWORTHY POLYPOROIDS.

We continue from page 29 our account of the most remarkable
polyporoids that form "new genera" for those who are hunting that
kind of game.

POLYSTICTUS CONCHIFER (Fig. 366).— A curious Poly-
stictus grows commonly on fallen elm branches in the United States.
It produces at the base little sterile disk-like pilei, and their develop-
ment is somewhat of a mystery. The fertile pileus is flabelliform, ta-
pering to a short stem with a disk-like base. It is pure white, glabrous,
and not zoned. The pores are white, rather large, and often sinuate.
The sterile portions are the most interesting part, for as far as known
no other species produces similar. They are to me somewhat of a
puzzle, for I do not know exactly how or why they are produced. It

Fig. 366.
Polystictus conchifer. Fig. 365 shows old sterile cups.

is the general impression that the fertile pilei grow from these sterile
cups. I think this was Morgan's view. I am not so sure that this
true. The fertile portion falls away each year, but the cups are per-
sistent and are found in the spring as shown in figure 365. I think,
however, they do not produce new pilei the second year. I have never
seen any so produced. On the other hand, I often find fertile pilei
without any sign of a cup. One large collection I made of two
three hundred pilei has very few "cups," and those that occur have
evidently been developed on the new pilei. My present belie

41

r- S

the plant produces a secondary abortive pileus, and that the fertile por-
tion falls away, while the cup persists through the winter, but does not
produce a fertile portion the following season.

Polystictus conchifer grows only on the elm and only in the United
States and Canada, as far as I know. It was named by Schwc-initz the
"shell-bearing," and he likened the sterile cup to a shell. I le also called
a species Polystictus virgineus, which, according to specimens in his
herbarium, is the same as conchifer. Cooke used the name virgineus
and tried to sink the name conchifer, but it was not a success, as con-
ctiifer is too good a name to be put aside. Besides there is some doubt
as to virgineus, for, while there is no doubt the plant in Schweinitz's
herbarium as virgineus is conchifer, it never takes either the shape or
color as shown in a figure that Schweinitz gave of it. Either the figure
is very poor of the plant, or represents something else.

FOMES GRAVEOLEXS (Fig. 367).— This is another curious
plant that was named by Schweinitz, and it is unique in the fact that
there is no other similar plant known in any portion of the world.22

Fig. 368.

Section of Fomes gravcolens.

It is a true Fomes, evidently of slow growth, and the densely imbricate
pilei grow from a globose, woody core. Its manner of growth is
plainly shown in our section (Fig. 368). The context

a In our text-books it is placed in a section Merisma, with a half dozen other., none of
which have the slightest resemblance to it in their manner of growth.

43

and core and the pores are of a uniform color (snuff brown, [303] ) and
of a hard, sub-woody texture. The pores are minute, with darker
mouths. This curious growth is rather rare in the central, western,
and southern United States. It seems to be absent from the Eastern
States, and I believe that Professor Peck has never recorded it from
New York. I have never seen it growing fresh, though I have speci-
mens from a half dozen correspondents. When fresh it is said to exhale
a strong odor, and is known to the natives as ''sweet-knot." I have
been told that they can detect it at a distance by its odor. Schweinitz
named it graveolens, and stated it has a strong sub-nauseous odor.
That hardly carries out the native name. At any rate the odor dis-
appears from dried specimens, and is contrary to the usual nature
of fragrant fungi, for the odoriferous principle as a rule gets stronger
with age. Around Cincinnati Fomes graveolens grows usually on
beech.23 Schweinitz's original reference was on oak, and Ravenel dis-
tributed it from the oak. The plant, though rare, is well known to
most American mycologists, and was recently illustrated by Kellerman,
and also by Hard.24 A little bit of unwritten history came to light on
my last visit to Paris. Stuck away in a closet I found one day the type
of Polyporus botryoides, as named by Leveille, from this specimen
that he found in the Museum "Patria incog." It is typically Fomes
graveolens, and I knew it as soon as I saw it. For sixty years it has
been kept in the museum, and no one had ever recognized it.-5

POLYPORUS POCULA (Figs. 369, 370, and 371).— This is
the smallest Polyporus known, and it was many years before it was
known to be a Polyporus at all. It grows erumpent from the bark of
various trees, and is particularly partial to the chestnut oak, though it
has been found on hickory, sumac, ash, cherry, etc. It has a short,
curving stem, which is black at the base. Surface smooth, brown,
powdery. The pore surface is a disk, always turned toward the ground,
and about 3 mm. in diameter when expanded. In drying it shrinks
and becomes somewhat cup-shaped. The context is white, tough, but
soft when moist, brittle and harder when dry. The pores are very
small (about 120 mic.) and from 400 to 520 mic. (l/2 mm.) deep. The
mouths are almost hidden by a layer of minute, encrusted, hyaline
hairs, usually described as pruinose.26 Spores (teste Cooke) globose,
hyaline, smooth, 4 mic.

23 This plant, which Berkeley received from Lea, Ohio, he called Polyporus conglobatus,
but he afterward corrected it, at least Ravenel did, probably at Berkeley's direction.

24 Hard, or probably the printer, got his figure upside down.

23 Polyporus botryoides passes in our literature as a "Polyporus," not even in the same
genus as Fomes graveolens. No one has ever suspected from our literature that it had the
most remote relation to Fomes graveolens, and yet it is this same very peculiar species. It
is an illustration of the value of the usual fungus "literature" and "description."

26"Peziza. — The disk is covered with a brown powder and appears minutely punctate.
After soaking in water the mouths of open tubes are very perceptible. They lie compactly to-

nher, are very long (or deep), and quite tough. They may be asci. If this is not a Peziza,
o not know where to place it. It is not Polyporus or Ascobolus." — Lea's original note to
Berkeley.

Which shows Lea to have been a very observing man. Had it not been that the mouths
of the tubes are masked by a "brown powder," I do not question but that Lea would have
recognized it as a Polyporus.

44

This curious little Polyporus is quite frequent in the United States usually
erumpent from the bark of the smaller branches. It will hardly be f
excepting by those who hunt for the small fungi. It is widespread particuLry
common m the South and extends to French Guiana and probably other por-
tions of South America. Several collections are known from Central Wrica
and a long stalked form from Brazil At Kew there is a single colkxtion from
Australia2' and at Berlin a typical collection from Japan (Fig 370).

Polypor

Fig. 369.

Pocula, showing natural size, also two specimens x6, and face of pores x6.

History. — This unique little Polyporus has had a curious history. It was
first called Sphaeria pocula by Schweinitz and he gave in the Proc., Phila. Acad.
Sci. a very fair illustration of it. The genus Sphaeria has the spores in asci, and
at that time embraced almost all the Pyrenomycetes. He sent it to Fries and
for forty years it was thought to be an Ascomycete as the pores were taken
to be the mouths of the asci. When Berkeley received it first from America
(Lea) he referred it to Sphaeria Pocula. When Fries divided the Pyrenomycetes
he made a genus Enslinia to include this species, not questioning that it was
a Pyrenomycete and called it Enslinia Pocula. This genus stood for a number
of years and Montagne referred to it a "new species" "Enslinia Leprieurii"
from French Guiana, which is exactly the same plant as Polyporus Pocula.28
In 1849 Berkeley received it from Curtis, growing on Rhus and published it
as Polyporus cupulaeformis, noting that it had the habits of "Sphaeria cupulac-
formis, Schweinitz." Berkeley was afterward aware that it was the same as
Polyporus Pocula as he at first labeled a Nicaraguan collection Pqlyporus cupu-
laeformis,29 but published it as Polyporus Pocula.

To Cooke should be given the credit of making known that the little
plant which passed for so many years as a "Sphaeria" was a Polyporus. He

27 This was received and determined by Cooke and included in the Handbook as Poly-
porus cupulaeformis (a synonym for Polyporus Pocula). I think it is correct. A section
shows the same "structure," though the surface is more rugulose than the American plant.

28 As this had not been published it was not raked up in the recent compilation (N. A. F.).

29 I think this label is in Berkeley's writing, but can not be sure, as it is written in
printed characters, as are many of the "U. S. Exp. Exped." labels. It was surely on Berkeley s

authority.

45

made the discovery independent of Berkeley's previous but obscure publication,
and he gave an excellent account and figure of it, showing its polyporoid nature.
This was about twenty-five years ago, and since that date the plant has been
generally and correctly known to all mycologists.30

Fig. 370.

Polyporus Pocula. From Japan.

Fig. 371. (x6)
Polyporus Pocula, var. longipes. from Brazil.

Forms.

This little plant seems very constant in America and the Japanese collection
is exactly the same. The Australian form (only one collection known) has a
more rugulose surface, but is essentially the same.

Var. longipes. At Berlin there is a collection from Brazil (Fig. 371 x6)
with a long stipe. It is only known from this collection.

Distribution. — The distribution of Polyporus Pocula as far as known is as
follows :

Frequent in the United States, having a preference for chestnut oak and
sumac ; extending south and apparently frequent through Central America and
northern South America.

Brazil, a single collection (at Berlin)of a long-stemmed form (var. longipes).

Japan, a fine collection (at Berlin).

Australia, a single collection (at Kew).31

30 The history of its juggling is almost as long as its "new species" history. Any plant
that departs as much as this from the usual habits of a Polyporus forms a "new genus," of
course, but they have had much trouble to get a name for it. Fries, as previously stated,
made a new genus for it, Enslinia in the Pyrenomycetes. Then a "Kew Index investigation"
showed that Enslinia was a name for a phaenogamic genus, and it was changed to Porodis-
cus. Then they discovered that was something else, and they changed to Porodisculus. I
have not heard of any juggle since.

The specific name pendula rests only upon two vague suggestions of Schweinitz and a
date dictionary shuffle of some alleged synonyms given by Fries. Although the name pendula
is attributed to Schweinitz, he always called the plant "pocula" and maintained to the last
that pendula was not only a different plant but a different genus. He preserved in his her-
barium unquestioned specimens of Polyporus pocula, but none of "pendula." The latter name
is only a date dictionary juggle of some alleged synonyms by Fries and originally had no
historic value. It is not only contrary to the usage of a half
published opinions of its author, Schweinitz.

half century, but contrary to all

31 The distribution is given in North American Flora as "from Connecticut to Nicaragua."
A little more thorough work in the museums of Europe would have extended the "distribu-
tion" to Brazil, Australia, and Japan.

46

POLYSTICTUS VILLOSUS AND POLYSTICTUS
PINSITUS.

When a name becomes well established in mycology, it is almost
utile to try to change it. Polystictus pinsitus was named b- Fries r^
Brazil, and while the type does not exist, there is a very common s
cies in the tropics, usually named Polystictus pinsitus in the museum"
and a plant so named by Fries is in his collection. This plant as

Flo. 372
Polystictus villosus.

Fig. 373.
Polystictus pinsitus.

ismoky or dark pores. Fries described the pores as white, but as 1
have never seen any but dark-pored specimens until recently, I sup-
posed this to be a discrepancy in the description. Recently I have gone
over a large collection made by Father Rick in Brazil. I find three col-
lections of a similar plant with white pores, and none with dark pores.

47

As Polystictus pinsitus was originally from Brazil, I think we are justi-
fied in concluding that this was the original of Polystictus pinsitus.

As to the dark-pored plant, usually called Polystictus pinsitus, we
have another name for that, and it is ancient enough to suit the most
rabid priorist. Swartz named a collection from Jamaica Boletus vil-
losus, and it was among the first foreign polyporoids to be named. His
type is at the British Museum and was stated to be the same as Poly-
stictus pinsitus by Berkeley years ago, and it surely is very close, ex-
cept that it has dark pores.34 The close resemblance of these two plants
will be noted from our photographs, and one could still call both Poly-
stictus pinsitus and not be far wrong. However, there is a difference
between them, and Polystictus pinsitus not only differs in having white
pores, but is more strongly zoned. If we distinguish them by different
names, then Polystictus pinsitus should be restricted to the plant with
white pores.

FOMES TORULOSUS IN AMERICA.

A most interesting addition to our knowledge of our American
Fomes is the finding of Fomes torulosus by Mr. C. W. Edgerton on
the trunk of a live oak in Audubon Park, New Orleans.

Fomes torulosus is a species of Europe, quite frequent in the
neighborhood of Paris. It was named by Persoon and included in his
published account in his "Traite les Champignons Comestibles." It
was not included by Fries in any of his works, and of course was
not compiled in Saccardo's Sylloge, as Saccardo began his compilation
of the Polyporei with Fries' Epicrisis. Recently the plant was dis-
covered to be a new species by both Quelet and Boudier, the former
calling it Fomes rubriporus and the latter Fomes fusco-purpureus. A
full account of these "discoveries" has been given in French on page
470 of Mycological Notes. It is a marked species with abundant, large,
colored setae and hyaline, globose spores about 4 mic. in diameter. The
pores of the fresh plant are of a decidedly purplish color, well named
by Boudier, but in old specimens they are disposed to lose their purplish
tinge and become dark. The spores of Fomes fusco-purpureus are de-
scribed as fulvous in Saccardo, but that is an error, as the plant has
hyaline spores, and was so originally stated by Boudier and shown in
his plate. We call attention particularly to this, for the spore colors
are the best means of distinguishing this class of plants. The plant
not having been recorded in America, it was of course not compiled in
the North American Flora, nor does it appear, I think, in any of
the numerous "new species" that have been discovered in this section.

I was very much pleased to receive this plant from Mr. Edgerton,
and it is a most interesting addition to our flora.

34 Mr. Murrill, who never saw Swartz's specimen, guessed it to be a plant that he should
have called Polystictus versatilis, a very common plant in the tropics, with no real resemblance
to Swartz's specimen. I see no advantage in crossing the Atlantic if one does not take the
trouble to look up the historic specimens in the museums, for just as good guesses could have
been made in New York, certainly none worse.

48

SYNOPSIS

OF THE

KNOWN PHALLOIDS

By
C. G. LLOYD

WITH AN

ILLUSTRATION OF EACH SPECIES

CINCINNATI, O. - SEPTEMBER, 1909

f¥-0F-€AtIFOlUiI£

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 0 1942
LIBRARY

In this pamphlet devoted to phalloids I am pleased to present a photograph of

Professor Ed. Fischer, Bern, Switzerland, who is the best authority

in the world on the phalloicl subject.— C. G. L.

INTRODUCTION.

Phalloids are in many respects the most remarkable fungi that
grow. Usually they are excessively fetid, and persons who would
pass by an ordinary fungus without noticing it have their attention
strongly fixed when they chance upon one of these "ill-smelling things."
In addition they assume most bizarre shapes and often bright colors.
I hope these features, probably intended by nature to attract flies, will
attract the attention of those to whom this pamphlet is sent.

From the very nature of phalloids, they should be studied in the
countries where they grow. Accurate work can not be done in Europe
with such fugitive plants, and a large part of what has been written
on the subject is not reliable. More has been added to our knowledge
by the observations of Penzig, Moeller, Fetch, Long, and Cobb, in
very recent years, than from all other sources, and these men observed
and studied the phalloids in the countries where they grow.

It was with the view of summarizing what is known of the
phalloid subject and making it available to students in all parts of
the world that this pamphlet has been written. We hope to interest
observers in such unworked fields as India, Japan, Australia, West
Indies, and South America (except portions of Brazil). We should
be glad if any observer in any country where the phalloids are not
well known (cfr. page 6) would publish with good photographs an
account of such species as he observes. We believe that all the well-
known species can be readily determined from this pamphlet.

We trust, however, that this will not lead to a flood of "new
species" by inexperienced observers. The species of phalloids, like
all fungi, are widely distributed, and wherever you may be located
most of the phalloids you will find are recorded in this work. They
may differ in unimportant details and seem new to you, but we strongly
advise you before publishing to first submit a good photograph, color
notes, and a dried specimen to Professor Ed. Fischer or to myself

for an opinion.

C. G. LLOYD,

63 rue Buffon, Paris, France.

2 3

WHAT IS A PHALLOID?

It would be out of place in a work of this kind, intended for gen-
eral distribution, to enter upon any technical, botanical discussion of
what constitutes a phalloid. Most persons know them by reputation,
and with certainty if they have met them. If not, they will know
them as soon as they look through our pictures.

Phalloids are always fleshy fungi, always fetid, and appear as if
by magic in our woods and fields. When young, they are enclosed in a
gelatinous membrane called a volva, which breaks, and the plant de-
velops so rapidly that I will not go into details for fear that some
of my readers will think I am not telling the truth. I have often
carried home the eggs, but have never seen them develop, as my
specimens have always developed during the night. In a single night
the species observed have reached a height of eight inches. One
author has a picture showing a plant to have grown 4 cm., or an inch

and a half, in one min-
ute of time. Of course
this is not true growth
by the accretion of
cells, but rather a me-
chanical process by the
> . expansion of cells.
k The "roots," or my-

• celium, as it is correctly
called, of p h a 1 1 o i d s
grow in the earth, or
rotten wood, and take
the form of long, white
cords. The illustration
on the opposite page is
a cluster of this myce-
lium, which has devel-
oped several "eggs," or
young phalloicls. If we
cut open one of these
eggs we will find it to
contain an undeveloped
plant, as shown in' the
figures herewith. But
it is best not to cut

them open, but to take them home and place them on a dish, and in
a few days you will have some perfect plants.

THE COLOR OF PHALLOIDS.

There are only three colors known in the phalloids : red, yellow,.
and white. Most species are red, or some shade of red, pink, flesh, or
orange. A few are \ellow, and many are white. The yellow and red
phalloids seem quite distinct, and do not run into each other, but
the red species are apt to have white forms.

4

DEFINITION OF TERMS.

In the description of phalloids it is necessary to use a few bo-
tanical terms, but they are simple and will be readily understood
from the following explanation.

VOLVA. — All phalloids (excepting one genus, Phallogaster) when young
are enclosed in a subglobose membrane called the volva. In this state a
phalloid can well be compared to an egg; in fact, it is customary to speak of
young phalloids as "eggs." The volva or shell, however, is a soft, thick, gelat-
inous membrane. When the plant develops the volva bursts at the top and
remains as a cup at the base of the mature phalloid. All our pictures of
phalloids show the volva at the base of the plant, at least all pictures that were
made from perfect plants. If there is no vclva at the base it is because the
illustration was drawn from an imperfect specimen.

RECEPTACLE.— This is a term that is applied to the portion of the plant
that bears the greenish, mucilaginous mass (called the gleba). In some
phalloids (such as Clathrus) the entire plant, exclusive of the volva, forms
the receptacle. In others, such as Simblum, the receptacle is borne on a stem.
Some phalloids are a simple, stem-like structure and bear the gleba directly
on the upper portion, then of course the upper portion of the stem is the
receptacle.

GLEBA. — This is a greenish, viscid, fetid substance with which all phalloids
are supplied. It is in fact the fruiting portion of a phalloid, for it contains
innumerable, microscopic spores which are analogous to the seed of flowering
plants. It is the gleba of a phalloid that is usually so excessively fetid.
This bad odor, as offensive as it may be to us, serves a useful purpose
to the plants, as it attracts flies and other insects that are the means of the
dispersion of the spores.

STEM. — The stem (or stipe) of a phalloid needs no special explanation.
It is used in the ordinary sense of the word. Some phalloids have no stems.

PILEUS.— There are some phalloids (the genus Phallus) that have the
gleba borne on a special membrane on the top of the stem. This is usually
conical or hat-shaped and is called the pileus.

VEIL. — A most striking feature in a few species that have pilei is a thin,
net-like membrane that hangs from under the pileus and spreads out as a net
around the stem. It is called the veil (or more correctly the inclusium) but
we prefer to call it the veil.

HISTORY OF PHALLOIDS.

We can not write the history of the phalloids because it is not known.
There are only five countries .in the world where the phalloids are well known,
viz: Europe, the United States, Brazil, Java, and Ceylon. Most of the myco-
logical writers have lived in Europe and the United States, and the easy,
conspicuous fungi such as the phalloids are well known. In Java most ex-
cellent accounts of the phalloids have been written by Penzig, and in Brazil
by Moeller. In the United States a good account of the phalloids of Texas
was published by Long, and in Hawaii by Cobb.1 Very recently — in fact, since
this pamphlet was in the printer's hands — we have had an excellent account
of the phalloids of Ceylon, by T. Fetch. Aside from these five papers, however,
most of the work on the subject has been in the line of new species exploitation.

1 Mr. Cobb marred his paper by discovering some " new species " that were only new to him ;
otherwise, his paper was most excellent

If a census were taken of the individual specimens that have reached
Europe from foreign countries, probably more than one-half have been dis-
covered to be "new species." Most of these new species finally gravitate where
they belong, into the trash pile known as synonyms. Professor Fischer of
Berne, bwitzerland, has done good work in disposing of a great many of them
We shall help the subject along to the best of our ability in one of our
appendices.

NAMES OF PHALLOIDS.

Like all objects of natural history, phalloids have Latin names and in
addition to each is usually appended a personal name, primarily designed to
tickle the vanity of some individual. Under this system they have never
acquired any stable names, for each person who writes about them is chiefly
interested in getting up new names to which to append his own. By this means
the names of phalloids (like all fungi) have been shuffled about like a shuttle-
cock. There are only forty-nine phalloids that are at all well known, and
fifty-eight more or less vague and often inaccurate accounts and forms. These
one hundred and seven species have two hundred and ninety-nine different
names. One of them alone. Phallus indusiatus, has twenty-four different names.
It is customary in "scientific" monographs to rake up all these various com-
binations, tabulate them, usually in chronological order, append with great
minutiae the various promoters of these names, and when finished the result
is so largely personal it resembles the society notes in a daily newspaper. We
present in an appendix (page 77) an alphabetical list of the names which in
our opinion have no value, to the number of 192, and in our Index (page 06)
the names we have adopted, to the number of 107. Every writer should,
of course, use a nomenclature that expresses his views of how the various
species are most naturally grouped into genera. And, where changes are
advisable in an author's arrangement, it is at best unfortunate, if he is using
a system of writing his own name after such changes, as it may give the
impression that this is perhaps the strongest reason for the change. We have
made but very few changes and have found it necessary to discover but one
new genus.

THE STATE OF PHALLOID KNOWLEDGE.

The phalloids of Europe (and there are but six species in Europe) are,
with perhaps one exception, well known. The same can be said to-day of those
of the United States, though, owing to the vague manner in which several of
them were exploited, it is only in recent years that any clear, definite idea
has been obtained of them. Taking into account those that occur in both
countries, this includes fourteen species and forms. The first foreign paper
in which the phalloids were well presented was only ten years ago, an account
of the species of Java, by Penzig. In this paper sixteen species and forms
were considered, and at least fourteen were well illustrated. Then there ap-
peared a paper on the phalloids of Brazil, by Moeller, in which nine species
were well illustrated. Recent writers, and this includes both Penzig and
Moeller, have had the benefit of photography, the best method of illustrating
a phalloid. Previously the illustrations were mostly made up from dried
specimens or copied from sketches, which gives results, sometimes very good,
but often more or less doubtful, sometimes very vague and amusing, and in
a few instances they seem to be pure fakes.2

There have been a number of compilations similar to this pamphlet, in
which the literature has been raked over, and the supposed species arranged
with their names more or less shuffled around. This, however, is the first
in which all the pictures have been brought together. The first crude attempt
was by Ventenat, in presenting cne of the first foreign species.

2 We know two or three in Europe that in our belief come under this head, and one in America.

7

Systema (1823) at which time nine foreign species had been figured, and
four in Europe, or thirteen in all, and one of the European was a freak. Ex-
cluding the freak, all twelve of these species are recognized in this pamphlet,
nine of them under the same names as used by Fries. The next general com-
pilation was by Schlechtendal, about fifty years ago. In the meantime, the
new species hunters had been quite busy, and Schlechtendal succeeded in finding
forty-five species, and he seems to have taken practically all of them at their
face value, nor did he indulge in inventing new genera in order to change
the names. It is an evidence of the "progress" that since that time, nearly
fifty years ago, not an iota of information has been added nor another
specimen recorded as to twenty-seven of his forty-five species. Some of them
have been discarded as being worthless on their face, but those of the twenty-
seven that are retained and known to-day are included in this pamphlet on
exactly the same knowledge (?) that Schlechtendal had when he wrote fifty
years ago. The next work was by Professor Fischer, in 1886, a compilation
of the species described and numbering seventy-six, including the doubtful
ones. Practically the same species were included in Saccardo (vol. 7) two
years later. After making these compilations, Professor Fischer began his
real study of the subject. First, he visited Paris and wrote his first Unter-
suchungen in 1890, then he visited London and Berlin and wrote his second
Untersuchungen in 1893. A third Untersuchungen, principally to include the
work of Penzig and Moeller, was issued in 1900. Professor Fischer has
studied practically all the specimens in the museums of Europe and the result
of his studies has been the rejection of many of the species included in his
earliest work, and the reduction of others to forms or varieties. Of the
seventy-six species included in his first work, only twenty-three stand as
original and good species, and twenty-eight are doubtful. In addition, twenty-
eight new species have been added, mostly the work of himself, Hennings,
Penzig, and Moeller. This makes a total of fifty-one species, recognized as
"good" by Professor Fischer, and twenty-eight doubtful, or a total of seventy-
nine.

I have worked over practically the same ground as Professor Fischer,
the same museums, and I am in very close accord with him as to the species.
As are all who have had the opportunity to see specimens from many localities,
Professor Fischer is very liberal in the treatment of species ; more so than I,
for I maintain a number in this pamphlet that Professor Fischer refers to
synonymy. I have not refused to recognize any "new species" that has been
exploited in an intelligent manner and that was accompanied by a drawing
or photograph showing any material difference. The twenty odd phalloids in
this pamphlet, in addition to those recognized in Professor Fischer's latest
work, are mostly those that he has referred as forms.

I decline to recognize the alleged "new species" that have been proposed
with so much verbosity and so little illustration. No man can give any idea
of a phalloid by a mere word description, whether he writes in English, French,
German, Chinese, or Pidgin Latin, and it is time this fiction was wiped out
of our "literature." In these days of "law-makers" there ought to be a law
with a heavy prison penalty for any one who engages in such work. I refer
to them in the synonyms as "nomina nuda," although it is a paradox to so call
things exploited with so much verbosity.

THE WORK IN THIS PAMPHLET.

We have included in this pamphlet the best illustration known of each
phalloid that we recognize. We consider the study of phalloids largely a
picture study, and our readers can take these illustrations and form an opinion
as tp the identity of any phalloid they find with almost as much advantage
as if they had access to the types.

In our text we have not entered into minute descriptions, believing that
in most cases it is superfluous. We have given the leading facts as to the
occurrence of the various species as far as known, the color, and have pointed
out the manner in which they differ from each other. We have presented

8

the best picture possible of each species, and in many cases the copies of the
original illustration from which the description was drawn. With these facts
before him, the reader can learn just as much about the phalloid as the author
who named it and wrote the "description."

CLASSIFICATION.

There are relatively few genera of phalloids, and they are classed
by their general form, so that the classification is a very simple mat-
ter and will be readily understood by the following table and the
illustrations. As a matter of convenience we divide them into five
groups :

ist, The simple stem section. Gleba borne directly on the upper portion
of a simple stem, or on a pileus borne on top of a simple stem.

Gleba borne on the outer surface of a special pileus.

Pileus even, rugose, or reticulate Phallus

Pileus surface strongly convolute Clautriavia

Pileus of a lamellate structure, the gleba covering the plates. . . . Itajahya

Gleba borne directly on the upper portion of the stem. No special pileus.

Smooth, even Mutinus

Rugose, papillate or uneven Jansia

Gleba covering a rudimentary network Floccomutinus

2d, The lobed section. Gleba spread over or on the inner surface of free
arms or lobes at the apex of the stem.

Arms free at the apex of a columnar stem Lysurus

Stipe, a flaring tube, the limb lobed Anthurus

Stipe bearing a disk-like expansion, the limb divided into lobes or

segments Aseroe

3d, The columnar section. Receptacle consisting of simple, vertical col-
umns, united at the top and bearing the gleba on the inner sides.

Sessile Laternea

Stalked Pseudocolus

4th, The clathrate section. Receptacle in the form of a clathrate or lat-
ticed structure.

Sessile, simple Clathrus

Stalked, receptacle a simple net.

Borne on a simple stem Simblum

Borne on columns that are united into a hollow tube at the base Colus

Stalked, the net-work having knob-like projections Kalchbrennera

5th, Anomalous genus, without volva Phallogaster

THE GENUS PHALLUS.

This is the original genus of Europe and from whence the name
of the order is derived. The genus is very simply characterized by
having a pileus, borne on the top of a simple stem. All species of
the genus are very much alike as to shape, but differ in color, in
size, in smoothness or roughness of the pileus, and in various de-
velopments of a veil. This veil, which is only known as rudimentary
in the related genus Mutinus, varies much in different species of
Phallus, and even in the same species in degrees of development.
Some species have only a rudimentary veil, others a distinct but very

9

short veil hidden under the pileus, or slightly protruding, others a
very conspicuous, long veil. The gleba covers the outer surface of
the pileus. In a few species this pileus is even, or relatively smooth ;
others reticulate, or ridged. Usually the pileus has an apical collar
that is entire or perforate, sometimes in the same species. Some
species are devoid of this apical collar, and one, Phallus subtilis, has
been erected into a genus principally on this account. We would
divide the species into two sections, as Professor Fischer does, though
we would not designate these sections by distinct generic names. We
think the old name Phallus should cover them both.

Section i, Veil short or merely rudimentary. Section 2, Witfr
distinct veils. Each section is also subdivided on the character,
whether the pileus is relatively smooth and even, or is reticulate with
ridges.

SECTION I. VEIL SHORT OR MERELY RUDIMENTARY.
PILEUS STRONGLY RETICULATE.

PHALLUS IMPUDICUS (Fig. i).— It seems to me to be use-
less to use any space in describing Phallus impudicus. It is such a
well-known plant, even to every peasant in Europe, and, besides, our
photograph is the best description. The stem is white and the pileus
has strong reticulations, not shown in our photograph where they are
covered with the gleba. Phallus impudicus is the original phalloid, and
the most common one of Europe. It extends throughout Europe. In
the United States we do not have the type form of Europe, but a
pinkish variety known as Phallus imperialis. In Japan, Phallus im-
pudicus (the type form I judge from the drawings I have seen) is
common. In Australia it is rare, if it occurs at all. Only one col-
lection is known, now at Kew, which does not accord exactly with
the European plant, but is close to it. Phallus impudicus probably
occurs in other countries, but the above are all that are surely known.

Forms.

PHALLUS IMPERIALIS.— This form differs from the type form only in
having a pink volva and in its distribution. I am told that in France it has
a different habitat, and a different odor. I can not vouch for that. At any
rate it is a rare plant in Europe, widely distributed but infrequent. In the
United States it is the only form of Phallus impudicus we have. It is common
in the West — Colorado, Southern California, and Texas. East of the Missis-
sippi, I know of but one station, Washington, D. C. From its distribution it
is evidently a plant that favors a warm climate and a sandy soil.

PHALLUS COSTATUS (Fig. 2).— This species, which was described from
Java, is evidently similar to Phallus impudicus, and seems to me is better con-
sidered as a form. It differs chiefly in having more pronounced, almost winged
reticulations to the pileus, and the substance of the pileus is described as
yellowish-white.

PHALLUS TENUIS (Fig. 3).— A small yellow-species, native
of the Orient. It can easily be known from all others of the section
by its yellow color, both of stipe and pileus, and in addition by its

10

rig. i.
PHALLUS IMPUDICUS.

Fig. 7.

PHALLUS RAVENELII.

II

Fig. 5.

PHALLUS PHALLUS RUBICUNDUS.
TENUIS.

!

>'•) >.)•

&_;$

Fig. 9.

PHALLUS RUGULOSUS.

Fig. 2.

PHALLUS COSTATUS.

Pig. 4.

PHALLUS FAVOSUS.

Fig. 8.

PHALLUS RAVENELII.

(reduced)
(With protruding veil.)

Fig. 10.
PHALLUS GLUTINOLENS.

small size and thin substance. The dried specimens appear like a.
thin skin. Phallus tenuis was originally from Java, but must be a
rare species there, as Dr. Bernard does not record it. It occurs also
in Ceylon (specimens at Kew), and Professor Kusano has found it
(very rarely) in Japan. In the latter country it grew on rotten wood.
The stipe of the Javanese form is yellow, but in Japan it was repre-
sented as white. The original description makes no mention of the
plant having a veil, but one of Penzig's figures shows a rudimentary
veil hidden under the pileus.

PHALLUS FAVOSUS (Fig. 4).— This species, also known from
Java, and rare there, is intermediate between Phallus impudicus and
Phallus tenuis. With the large size of the former, it has a relatively
thin pileus and a pale, yellowish stem. The substance of the pileus
is also pale, but not so clear yellow as that of tenuis. It is only
known from the original record.

PILEUS RELATIVELY SMOOTH OR MERELY RUGULOSE.

PHALLUS RUBICUNDUS (Fig. 5).— Stem, red. Pileus, red,,
smooth, or slightly rugose, covered with the greenish gleba. Apex,
perforate, or sometimes imperforate. This is the only red species of
the genus Phallus that we have, and it is widely distributed. It oc-
curs in abundance in certain localities in our Southern States and
many other warm countries. It has been named from India (Phallus
aurantiacus), Africa (Phallus sanguineus), Australia, Hawaii. I have
seen a drawing from China, and it is reported from Japan. In Hawaii
it has been shown to be the cause of a destructive root disease of the
sugar cane. When we get a better knowledge of the distribution of
our phalloids, I think that Phallus rubicundus will be found in almost
all sugar countries. I believe there is only one red Phallus. Forms
from various countries seem to differ in being slender or obese ;
the pilei, in being truncate or acute, perforate or imperforate, with
an apical collar or without, but the material is not at hand from
which to form any opinion as to the systematic value (if any) of these
differences.

Forms.

PHALLUS GRACILIS (Fig. 6).— Phallus rnbicundus varies chiefly in
stature. Slender forms have been called Phallus gracilis. For a long time
the characters of Phallus rubicundus were not known other than the fact that
we had a, red Phallus in our Southern States. A recent article of Professor
Long has given us a clear idea of its characters and convinced us there is no
distinction Between it and Phallus aurantiacus as it has generally been known
in foreign countries.

PHALLUS RAVENELII (Fig. 7).— This is the most common
phalloid of the United States, there replacing Phallus impudicus of
Europe. In general appearance it resembles Phallus impudicus, but
has a smoother pileus and a veil, usually short and hidden under the
pileus. Rarely, however, it occurs with a protruding veil (Fig. 8).
Usually Phallus Ravenelii grows on logs in the woods, sometimes on

U

Fig. 6
PHALLUS GRACILIS.

> ««•
ite- i/r '

Fig. 15.

PHALLUS DAEMONUM.

Pig. 12.

PHALLUS INDUSIATUS.

I 6

Fig. 16.
PHALLUS DUPLICATUS.

the ground, and sometimes it develops in the greatest abundance on
old piles of sawdust. The species is only known from the United
States and Canada.

PHALLUS RUGULOSUS (Fig. 9).— Pileus, thimble-shaped,
almost even or slightly rugulose, with a small, globose, apiculate col-
lar. Color, dark. Veil, none. Stem, pale reddish. This species was
described from alcoholic material, and is known only from Japan,
where it is reported to be common. I have seen a drawing from
Professor Kusano. As I understand it, the substance of the pileus is
not red, otherwise the plant seems close to Phallus rubicundus. I
should not be at all surprised if it develops that it is a slender form
(gracilis) when the color of the pileus substance is known.

PHALLUS GLUTINOLENS (Fig. 10).— This is a unique
species of Phallus, known only from Brazil. It has white stipe and
no evident veil. The pileus is smooth and differs from all other species
in the globose shape. It has only been observed by its original author,
who gives us a good photograph of it.

PHALLUS SUBTILIS (Fig. n).— This Brazilian species has
only been illustrated by a sectional drawing. A photograph would
not show any marked difference from any other small Phallus. It
was erected into a separate genus because the pileus has no apical
collar, and a section shows it to be formed of radiate plates. It is also
somewhat gelatinous in its nature. It is only known from Brazil and
from the work of the original author.

SECTION 2. VEIL EVIDENT, USUALLY STRONGLY DEVELOPED.
PILEUS STRONGLY RETICULATE.

PHALLUS INDUSIATUS (Fig. 12).— Pileus broadly campan-
ulate, strongly reticulate. Veil strongly developed, of small, slender
threads and large meshes. Color of stipe and veil white. This is
the most common phalloid of all tropical countries and is found in
quantities in all of the museums. We have noted specimens from
Australia, India, Andaman Island, Java, Ceylon, East Africa, Mau-
ritius, Mexico, Brazil, British Guiana, French Guiana, South Africa,
Surinam, New Caledonia, Cuba, Tonkin, Philippines, Borneo, Ja-
maica. We have received it from a number of correspondents and
have collected it (common) in Samoa.

Forms.

Phallus indusiatus varies in the tropics, chiefly in the shape of the pileus
and the veils. Also in color, I think, and I suspect that in time it will not
be found practicable to keep distinct Phallus callichrous and Phallus multicolor
as other than color forms. Usually the veil is flaccid, but at other times more
rigid. Sometimes it is united above into a distinct membrane. These forms
seem to have a geographical significance, but so little is known that at present
it is not possible to designate the distribution of the various forms. In Samoa,
where I have observed it common, it never takes anything but the type form.

18

Fig. 13.

PHALLUS MOELLERI.

PHALLUS ROSEUS.— A form with a pink veil, which is at Paris, from
French Guiana. It is also reported from Java.

PHALLUS MOELLERI (Fig. 13).— A form with a narrow pileus and
rigid, spreading veil, as illustrated by Alfred Moeller, from Brazil. Professor
Moeller states that in Brazil it runs into the type form so intimately that it
is not practicable to keep it distinct.

In the recent article by T. Fetch, it is stated that this rigid veil is not a
form even, but the normal condition of the veil of Phallus indusiatus when
first expanded and before the sun strikes it. That which I have taken for the
type form is a condition after the veil has been wilted by the sun. I have
never observed this (in Samoa) nor should I have suspected it, as they seem
so different, but Professor Petch undoubtedly knows. In the interest of truth
then "Phallus Moelleri" must be deleted, even as a form.

PHALLUS ROCHESTERENSIS (Fig. 18).— A form with an elongated
thimble-shaped pileus and narrow, cylindrical veil is found at Kew, from
Australia. It has been illustrated under the erroneous name, Phallus merulinus.

Color Forms.

There are two very showy tropical phalloids that in shape and other char-
acters appear to be the same as Phallus indusiatus, but have bright colors. At
the present time we can characterize them by their colors, but when the
phalloids come to be well known, I think so many intermediate colors will be
found that color characters alone will not be held to constitute species. T. Petch
finds these color forms abundant in Ceylon, and states that they grade into
the white form so intimately that it is not possible to keep them distinct even
as forms. I am satisfied, however, that they have a geographical significance.
They do not occur in Samoa, and Mr. C. B. Ussher, who has observed the
species in tropical Africa, informs me that they are absent there.

PHALLUS MULTICOLOR (Fig. 14).— This was originally from Aus-
tralia, but has been recently found and photographed from Java. Pileus orange
red, veil bright lemon yellow, stipe lemon yellow, volva pink, mycelium purple.
The characters, if they are real characters, of the species are the colors as-
stated above.

PHALLUS CALLICHROUS.— This appears to be different from multi-
color only in the coloration. The pileus is orange, the veil and stipe white.
It has never been illustrated, but probably could not be distinguished by a
photograph alone from either multicolor or indusiatus. It was originally named
from Brazil, but similarly colored plants have been observed in Java, Africa,
and Australia.

PHALLUS DAEMONUM (Fig. 15).— This, which was the original foreign
phalloid, illustrated from the island of Amboy, was published one hundred and
sixty years ago.3 All that is known of it to this day is the original, crude
figure that we present. It seems quite distinct from the usual form in its
punctate rather than reticulate pileus, if that proves to be a character of the
plant and not of the figure only.

PHALLUS DUPLICATUS (Fig. 16).— Pileus with a strongly
developed apical collar and strong reticulations. Veil long, white, of

Sit has therefore strong claims to be taken as the specific name for the species as proposed by
Professor McGinty. There are two objections to it, however. First, it may be the "type" in the per-
verted sense that the word "type" is usually used, but it does not seem to be the typical form as the

20

Fig. 14.

PHALLUS MULTICOLOR.

thick threads, which in alcoholic specimens contract and form almost
a membrane. This is a common plant in the United States and is so
close to the tropical species it may well be considered a temperate
region form of it. However, it differs in the nature of the veil and
the usual shape of the pileus, and I am convinced that it is as dis-
tinct as species generally are. The veil (which is torn in our figure)
is a conspicuous feature of the plant.

Forms.

We would be disposed to consider related plants with a similar veil as
forms of this species.

PHALLUS SUBUCULATUS, of Algeria, which was inaccurately figured,
is, we think, a form of it.

PHALLUS MAURITIANUS (Fig. 17).— This form, which we have re-
ceived in alcohol from Chas. O'Connor, of Mauritius, we feel is worthy of a
separate designation as a form. It differs from the typical plant in the nature
of the reticulations of the pileus, and is better shown in our photograph than
we can tell it.

Note.- — -We formerly included in this section, under the name Phallus irpicinus, the
only known phalloid with a well developed veil and rugulose pileus. It was proposed as a
new genus (or a new section) Clautriavia, on account of having the pileus minutely con-
volute. We were not disposed to consider that of generic value, until recently when we saw
at Berlin a New Guinea species with such a strongly convolute pileus, and such a marked
character that we now feel that the genus Clautriavia should be maintained. Compare Clau-
triavia merulina on the next page.

IMPERFECTLY KNOWN SPECIES OF THE GENUS PHALLUS.

Many phalloids are known (?) only from old cuts based mostly on dried
specimens and, in some instances, fertile imaginations. Naturally they are
of not much importance for no one ever finds them again, but there is no
way of getting rid of them. The genus Phallus has been especially favored (?)
in this regard. We give a short synopsis of them here and have relegated the
(alleged) pictures to an appendix.

PHALLUS DISCOLOR (Fig. 95).— From Australia, if correctly illus-
trated (with an emphasis on the "if"), is an intermediate plant connecting
the genera Phallus and Mutinus. It was alleged to have the pileus adnate
at the base to the top of the stem.

PHALLUS CALYPTRATUS (Fig. 96).— From Australia. Appears to
be based chiefly on an accidental mass of gleba dried on top of the pileus.

PHALLUS RETUSUS.— Originally exploited as a new genus, it is re-
ported by Professor Fischer (who has seen the "type") as an obese form of
auran'ciacus. The figure has no resemblance to aurantiacus, but it does not
follow that the plant has none. It was from Australia.

PHALLUS CAMPANULATUS (Fig. 98).— Known only from the figure
(Uruguay). The little cup at the base is not the volva, but the "inner" yolva.
It seems to have an even pileus and be close to Ravenelii, though nothing is
known as to its veil. No specimen exists.

PHALLUS CELEB1CUS (Fig. 99).— Said to grow in the Celebes and
to have a whitish pileus and a yellow stem. It appears from the published
account to be very close to Phallus rubicundus.

PHALLUS CANARIENSIS (Fig. 100).— If the figure is correct it is a
peculiar little species with a slender stipe and large, rugulose pileus. Both

Pig. 17.
PHALLUS MAURITIANUS.

Fig. 11.

PHALLUS SUBTILIS.
(Section.)

Fig. 18.

PHALLUS ROCHESTERENSIS.

pileus and stipe are rose colored. It was from the Canary Islands. I have
found no type.

PHALLUS FARLOWIL— This from alcoholic (or dried?) material from
Brazil has never been illustrated. It is said to have a membranous veil, other-
wise it is very close to Phallus indusiatus.

PHALLUS QUADRICOLOR (Fig. 102).— I think is probably based on
a specimen of Phallus multicolor which has lost its veil. From Australia.

THE GENUS CLAUTRIAVIA.

This genus is characterized by having the surface of the pileus
convoluted in folds, the gleba covering the folds and permeating the
interspaces between them. Our figure (which is an enlargement six

diameters) will give a clear idea of
this structure. The original species,
Clautriavia merulina, which is a fre-
ciuent plant in Java, Ceylon, and the
East Indies, in general (probably)
has very minute folds, so that the
surface to the eye appears even, but a
recently discovered species of New
Guinea, Clautriavia Lauterbachii, has
the folds so strongly convoluted that
in the egg the pileus appears to be a
crumpled veil covered with gleba.

CLAUTRIAVIA MERULINA
(Fig. 19). — This species has the gen-
eral appearance of being a Phallus.
The pileus, however, instead of being
a plain or reticulate membrane with the gleba on the outer surface,
consists of minutely convoluted folds, the gleba permeating the de-
pressions between the folds. It has long been known as a common
species in Java.4 Recently T. Fetch has published that it is abundant
in the grounds of the Botanical Garden at Peradeniya, Ceylon. When
the truth of the subject is known it will probably be found to be gen-
erally distributed in the East Indies and neighboring countries.

CLAUTRIAVIA LAUTERBACHII (Fig. 20).— This species,
which has a most remarkable structure, is unfortunately known only
from some undeveloped plants from New Guinea. The pileus in the

Berkeley named the plant Phallus merulinus, many years ago, and while he gave no
he characterized it in an unmistakable manner,

it appears to me now. Fischer incorrectly referred the name as
indusiatus, and Cooke illustrated a form of Phallus indusiatus of Australi;

formal description of it (in pidgin Latin)

synonym for Phallus
under Berkeley's

ame. Patouillard discovered it to be a "new species" from Java, and named it irpicinus,
which name we have previously used, and would continue to use if it had any application to
ir_ _j .. *T> i. _!_..•_ _ _ 4.i,_ , !„ _r « :, .:*.." K..* _..:£K:I:«.., ^^

the plant. We adopt Berkeley';

lieving that when a plant has two names, one very good and one very

be chosen.

24

ability, be-
the better should

CLAUTRIAVIA MERUUNA

egg is a strongly folded and convolute membrane resembling at first
view a crumpled veil. What form it takes in the developed plant is
not known, but it is probable that it does not change much, as the
form of a pileus is in all known instances well defined in the egg.
In addition the volva is covered with wart-like processes, which,
while unknown as to any other phalloid, is in my opinion a minor
character. The plant is only known from New Guinea, and a photo-
graph of a developed plant is much desired.5

Fig. 20.

CLAUTRIAVIA LAUTERBACHII.

Section by Fischer. Photograph of the volva, also of the folds of the inner
face of the pileus.

THE GENUS ITAJAHYA.

This genus in general appearance resembles the genus Phallus,
but is quite different in the structure of the pileus. This consists of
lamellate plates, the gleba covering these plates, permeating the inner
structure of the pileus.

5 Until I saw the specimens I had a very erroneous idea of the characters of the
plant, and I think they have been inaccurately presented in the published accounts. When
Dr. Hennings received these phalloid eggs he sent them to Professor Fischer, who made
what impresses me as a very accurate drawing of a section that he returned to Dr. Hennings
with the suggestion that it be called Ithyphallus Lauterbachii. We reproduce Professor
Fischer's section in our figure (20). Dr. Hennings did not publish Fischer's figure as re-
ceived, but modified it, showing a "hut" and an "indusium." The plant has but one mem-
brane, which should be called the "hut," as it bears the gleba and is analogous to a pileus.
There is no indusiuri|. One of the egg sections at Berlin would at first view seem to have
a rudimentary indusium, but on closely examining it I find it is a division of the stem,
which in this instance seems to divide above and support the pileus in the manner of a Hel-
vella. The pileus in the egg is so convoluted that my first impression (until I noticed that
it bore the gleba) was that i*. was an indusium, and that here we had a type of a new genus
of phalloid which had a veil but no pileus. Dr. Hennings first published it under Fischer's
name, Ithyphallus Lauterbachii. Afterwards he republished it as a new genus Echinophallus,
basing it principally on the protuberances of the volva, a minor character, in my opinion.
The main character of the plant, the strongly folded and convoluted pileus, is unique in this
species and establishes, for me at least, the validity of Patouillard's genus Clautriavia, based
on the same character, though in a much less developed form.

26

IT A J AH Y A GALERICULATA (Figs. 21 and 22).— But one
species of the genus is known, which is a native of Brazil, from whence
it was well described and illustrated by Moeller. It has since been
found there by Father Schupp. Robert E. Fries recently records the
plant as common in Argentina, and it is probably frequent and widely
distributed in South America." Our photographs and the sectional
figure of the pileus are all that are necessary to enable one to recog-
nize the plant.

Fig. 21.

ITAJAHYA GALERICU-
LATA.

Fig. 22.

ITAJAHYA GALERICU
LATA. (Section.)

THE GENUS MUTINUS.

This genus is distinguished from Phallus, to which it was formerly
united by having no distinct pileus, the gleba being borne on tl
upper portion of a simple stem. Sometimes the gleba-beanng por

«Mr. Fries suggests, not without reason, that it may be the original rf
"new genus" Alboffiella, which if true is a prior name. In that case I "»^T?
a rank injustice and a travesty on science to replace the excellent work done by
his name, by the inaccurate work of Spegazzmi ?

27

tion is distinct from the stem, taking somewhat the nature of a dis-
tinct pileus, but in other species it is not clearly marked from the stem.
The species of Mutinus are all very similar and are distinguished by
their general form. All are red, or sometimes have white forms.

MUTINUS CANINUS (Fig. 23).— This, which is the only spe-
cies of Mutinus that grows in Europe, has a short, distinct, spore-bear-
ing portion, which is sharply distinct from the stem. I do not know
whether it is a constant character, but I have seen alcoholic specimens
where the receptacle was abruptly contracted and of a smaller diam-
eter than the stem. The structure of the receptacle is always differ-
ent, being of small, thick-walled cells, while those of the stem are
large and thin-walled.7 Mutinus caninus is not rare and is widely
spread in Europe. In the United States it is much rarer, and while
I think it is well authenticated, it occurs principally in the Eastern
States. The stem of Mutinus caninus is usually red, though white-
stemmed forms have been figured on several occasions.

MUTINUS ELEGANS (Fig. 24.)— In this species there is no
distinction between the stem and the spore-bearing portion. It is all
one uniform, cellular structure, with no sharp line of demarcation.
The form is generally tapering from a thickened base to an acute
apex. Mutinus elegans is the most common Mutinus that we have
in the United States. It grows in the woods around old logs or soil
rich in humus. It is not rare. The color is red or orange.

MUTINUS RAVENELII (Fig. 25).— This species has the same
cellular structure as the preceding and has been held to be the same
plant. I am satisfied it is distinct in form (usual) and habitat. The
shape is club-form, thickened above, and tapering below. The habitat
is old fields devoid of woods humus. It is a rare plant in the United
States. The color is red.

MUTINUS BAMBUSINUS (Fig. 26) . — Receptacle distinct
from the stipe, formed of small cells. Color of both stipe and recep-
tacle is red. This, which seems to be the common species of the
tropics, is very similar to Mutinus caninus of Europe. However, it
has a much longer spore-bearing portion and the color is brighter
red. It was originally from Java, but occurs in the Celebes, Brazil,
and no doubt in many tropical countries. It has been noted, adventi-
tious, in the hot-houses at Kew.

MUTINUS FLEISCHER! (Fig. 27).— The most obese species
of Mutinus known. It has a thick stem and a very short, contracted
spore-bearing portion. Its structure is that of Mutinus caninus, of
Europe, but it is a much more obese plant. It is known only from
Java and is a rare plant there. The color is red.

7 This has always been my observation, and my understanding of the essential char-
acter oi Mutinus caninus. I have recently seen at Berlin alcoholic specimens of eggs and
sections of eggs of Mutinus caninus from Europe, where I can not note any difference in
the cells of the stem and gleba-bearing portion.

28

Tig. 26.

MUTINUS BAMBUSINUS.

Fig. 23.

ITINUS CANINUS.

Fig. 24.

MUTINUS ELEGANS.

MUTINUS PENTAGONUS (Fig. 28).— All the previous spe-
cies of Mutinus have cylindrical stems, but in this species the stem
is pentagonal (or sometimes six-angled). The gleba-bearing portion
is also strongly fluted, and the gleba is borne on the channels with
free edges. In the genus Lysurus the lobes, when young, are con-
nivent, and the young plants of L/ysurus Mokusin evidently closely
resemble this species. In Mutinus pentagonus I am convinced from
an examination of dried specimens that there are no arms, but that
the receptacle consists of a single piece. Mutinus pentagonus is
known only from Australia, and but scantily there.

MUTINUS XYLOGENUS (Fig. 29).— This is the smallest phalloid
known and an idea of its size can be obtained from our photograph, which is
an enlargement six diameters. It is only known from a collection made in
French Guiana many years ago, and preserved at Paris. It is a question whether
it is a Phallus or a Mutinus (cfr. Myc. Notes, p. 336). If a Mutinus, it is
not only the smallest species known, but differs from all other species in having
a globose mass of gleba.

Fig. 25.

M-UTINUS RAVENELII.

Fig. 29.

MUTINUS XYLOGENUS.
(Enlarged x6.)

DOUBTFUL AND LITTLE KNOWN SPECIES.

The same remarks apply here as under the same head concerning i he
genus Phallus. Mutinus minimus, Mutinus borneensis, Mutinus proximus, and
Jansia boninensis may all prove to be the same plant.

30

Pig. 27.

MUT1NUS FLEISCHER!.

Fig. 28.

MUTINUS PENTAGONUS.

MUTINUS MINIMUS (Fig. 103).— Known from a figure reconstructed
from a dried or alcoholic specimen. Color, red. Seems to differ from others
in its rugulose receptacle. Described from Tonkin.

MUTINUS BORNEENSIS (Fig. 104).— Figured from Borneo, in an
Italian journal. Was said to have a white stipe and short red spore-bearing
portion. We reproduce a figure from Tonkin.8

MUTINUS PROXIMUS.— Based on a dried specimen in the British
Museum, from Ceylon. It is a small species, described as having a white
stipe, but the plant is accompanied by a sketch showing an orange stipe. It
seems to be close to caninus. It has not been figured.

MUTINUS CURTUS (Fig. 105).— Only known from one collection made
in Australia sixty years ago, which seems to be immature. The figure recon-
structed by Corda is no doubt inaccurate, especially as to the lobed volva.

MUTINUS PAPUASIUS (Fig. 106).— Known only from a figure from
a dried specimen, from Australia. It is not known whether it is a Mutinus
or a Phallus.

MUTINUS ARGENTINUS (Fig. 107).— This was originally published
without illustration and was referred by Professor Fischer, doubtfully, to
Mutinus Muelleri. The latter seems from Fischer's illustration to be Mutinus
bambusinus, and is so referred by Moeller. Spegazzini has recently published
a figure of Mutinus argentinus which seems to me quite different from bam-
businus. It has a short, thick spore-bearing portion. From the figure one could
not say it was not Mutinus caninus of Europe, though it is rather stocky for that.

Fig. 30. Tig. 32. Fig. 35.

JANSIA RUGOSA. JANSIA ELEGANS. JANSIA BO-

(Natural size.) (Natural size.) NINENSIS.

"In our account, Myc. Notes, p. 388, we confused Mutinus borneensis of Borneo with Mutinu;
minensis of Bonin Island. Both are imperfectly known, but the latter seems to be a Jansia,
id both may in time prove to be the same plant. Since we have seen the types of Jansia
minensis we think we have inaccurately referred here (page 402) a species of Mutinus
om Japan.

from Japan

32

THE GENUS JANSIA.

This is a genus of very small phalloids, common in Java and
vyell illustrated by Penzig. The general form is that of a Tittle Mu-
tmus, but the spore-bearing portion is strongly differentiated from
the stipe, and it is strongly rugulose or papillate. Two species occur
m Java and have been well illustrated. They grew on rotten wo,,,]
I here are two imperfectly known species, one from Bonin Island and
one from Australia.

rig. si.

JANSIA RUGOSA.
(Enlarged.)

Fig. 33.

JANSIA ELEGANS.
(Enlarged.)

Fig. 34.

JANSIA ANNULATA.

JANSIA RUGOSA (Figs. 30 and 31).— This is a very small
phalloid, which is common in Java. The short gleba-bearing portion
is strongly distinct from the stipe and is strongly rugulose, as shown
in our enlargement (Fig. 31). It is the only species of Jansia that is
common and well known. This little plant is white and grows on
rotten wood.

JANSIA ELEGANS (Figs. 32 and 33).— This species is also
known only from Java and is rare, at least Dr. Bernard does not re-
port it. It grows on rotten bamboo stems. It is of the same size

33

and appearance as the preceding little species, but the gleba-bearing
portion is strongly covered with little processes, instead of being ru-
gulose.

JANSIA ANNULATA (Fig. 34).— This plant is known only from a figure
published from Australia. No specimen exists. The stipe is white, the gleba-
bearing portion "red-ochre" and "annulated." The plant is therefore probably
a Jansia, but this is not surely known.

JANSIA BONINENSIS (Fig. 35).— This species from Bonin Island, is
only known, I think, with certainty, from one collection in alcohol. The gleba
bearing portion is slightly rugulose, and it seems intermediate between Mutinus
and Jansia, being typically neither. The type collection is in alcohol in Berlin.
I am not sure that Mutinus minimus and Mutinus borneensis are not both
the same as this species.

Fig. 36a.

FLOCCOMUTINUS ZENKERI.
(Showing habits of plant.)

Tig. 36.

FLOCCOMUTIN
ZENKERI.

(Much enlarged

THE GENUS FLOCCOMUTINUS.

This genus is very curious and is intermediate between the pileate
and non-pileate phalloids. The gleba covers a loosely attached net-
work surrounding the stipe, and while similar to the veil of a Phallus,
it is analogous to the pilcus of a Phallus. The drawing by Professor
Fischer (our figure 36) gives a good idea of this structure. The exact

34

attachment of this network I could not make out from the type owine
to the minuteness of the parts, though that it is attached (loosely) in
some manner is evident. It appears to me as a very distinct eenus
essentially different in its basic structure from both the genera Tansia
and Mutinus, with which it has been recently united.

FLOCCOMUTINUS ZENKERI (Figs. 36 and 36a).-But
one collection of this curious genus is known, which is in alcohol in
the museum at Berlin. It is accompanied by a colored sketch of the
fresh plant, made by the collector, showing well its habits. We re-
produce this drawing (Fig. 36a), though, owing to the difficulty of
photographing colors, our figure does not do the drawing justice." Tn
habits Floccomutinus Zenkeri is very similar to Jansia elegans of Java.
The little plants are borne caespitose on a common, mycelial pad. The
eggs are elongated in form and open at the apex. 'The volva is not
accurately shown in Figure 36.

THE GENUS LYSURUS.

This genus has been very much misunderstood, though of a
very simple structure. It consists of free arms borne on a hollow
columnar stem. The gleba is borne on the arms. It has been shown
that in the original species the gleba is borne on the outer side of
the arms, hence species with gleba on the inner surface of the arms
have been transferred to Anthurus, which genus does not have a
columnar stem. I think it is much simpler to define Lysurus as orig-
inally defined, viz. : a columnar stem bearing free arms at the apex.
With respect to the position of the gleba, there are evidently two
series, and a new genus will probably be made for those with the
gleba on the inner side of the arms. It has recently been shown by
Mr. T. Fetch, Ceylon, that the arms of Lysurus Gardneri9 (which was
the second species known) are not entirely free, but are united by a
delicate membrane. We would therefore modify the definition of the
genus to include species with arms free or very slightly united.

9 Ever since the species was published there has been a difference of opinion as to
whether the arms were united or not, a difference of opinion that was legitimate from the
fact that the type specimens at Kew do not bear out the original statement in this respect.
Before seeing the specimens Fischer decided they were united, and changed the classification
on that account. Massee, who had the type in charge, writes: "The segments are not organ-
ically united at the tip, but during the young stage are closely pressed together, and having
been dried in that condition appear to be united. When the mucilage is moistened the tips
are found to be quite free and are normally so in several out of the twenty-three specimens
in the herbarium." Knowing the direct divergence of opinion on the subject, I went very
carefully into the question on my previous visit to Kew. Some of the specimens appear to
have never been united (see photograph, Figure 383, from one of the types), and while in
many specimens they are convergent and covered with the gleba, I did not believe there was
any union between them, and so published. I included them in Lysurus, where I think the
plant is best classed, though as they arc united it becomes necessary to modify the definition
of this genus. Mr. Fetch, who has observed two specimens fresh, finds the tips of the arms
united by a delicate membrane, a fact that could not be told from the dried specimens t
Kew. He puts it in the genus Colus, although it has no resemblance or analogy to that genus.
In order to justify his name he changed the definition of the genus Colus, and gives it a
definition that excludes from the genus the original and only species known to belong to it.
I believe a man has a right to modify a definition of a genus to include species which he
thinks should be classed in the genus, but he has no right to draw up his definition so as to
exclude the original species and change the original idea entirely.

4 35

LYSURUS MOKUSIN (Fig. 37).— This is the original species
of Lysurus and was one of the first foreign phalloids known. It was
figured in 1774 by Father Cibot, a missionary in China. The stem
is strongly fluted and bears free arms, which are also fluted. It has
been found in several stations in China and Japan, but is unknown
from other parts of the world. We have a drawing from Professor
Gono, Japan, that shows a white stem and red arms. We do not
know, however, that these colors are constant.

Fig.38a Fig. 40.

LYSURUS GARDNERI. LYSURUS LYSURUS BOREALIS.

(Photo of a type.) AUSTRALIENSIS. (Stocky form.)

(From the type.)

LYSURUS GARDNERI (Figs. 38 and 38a).— This species has
been known for many years only from the original collection from
Ceylon, at Kew. It has been recently discovered in Ceylon by Mr.
Fetch, but is of rare occurrence and only recorded from the island.
Mr. Fetch's observations of the fresh plant show that the arms are
united by a very distinct membrane, which would take it out of the
genus Lysurus as formerly defined. As it was originally classed in this
genus, however, and as its relations are evidently with the genus Ly-
surus, I think it better to modify the definition of the genus to in-

36

Fig. 37.

LYSURUS MOKUSIN.

Fig. 38.

LYSURUS GARDXERI.

37

elude it.10 The photograph of Lysurus Gardneri, as well as the dried
specimens, has a close resemblance to the two following species, and
I have heretofore believed that in time they would all three prove to
be the same species. We must abandon this idea now that Professor
Fetch has demonstrated that the arms of Lysurus Gardneri are organ-
ically united, for they are entirely distinct in both of the following
species.

Il

Fig. 42.

LYSURUS
CLARAZTANUS.

\

Fig. 43.

LYSURUS SANCTAE-
CATHERINAE.

Fig. 45.

LYSURUS WOODII.
(From the co-type.)

LYSURUS AUSTRALIENSIS (Fig. 39).— One collection of a
Lysurus from Australia is at Kew, published as above. How it dif-
fers from Lysurus borealis I do not know. Professor McAlpine has
advised me of a red Lysurus in Australia, but I have not had further
details. As I think the published figure of Lysurus Australiensis is
overdrawn and inaccurate, I present a photograph of the type, which,
while not satisfactory, is true as far as it goes.

LYSURUS BOREALIS (Figs. 40 and 41).— This is claimed
to be distinct from the preceding, but I know no points of difference.

10 It has been classed in the genus Colus, but for me it has no characters in com-
mon with the genus Colus, which is a clathrate genus. It might be included in Pseudocolus
according to the definition of that genus, but it is so different from all species of that genus
1 think it better not to so include it.

38

Fig. 45a.

LYSURUS (unnamed).
(The limb and an arm enlarged five times.)

Fig. 41.

LYSURUS BOREALIS.
(Slender form.)

Fig. 44.
LYSURUS CRUCIATUS.

39

It has a curious history in the United States and Europe and is sup-
posed to be an introduced plant. It grows in gardens, sod, and other
cultivated places. It occurs mostly in our Eastern States. In Europe
it has been found in three localities, all in recent years. First by
Dr. Hennings in Germany, then by Mr. Carleton Rea in England,
and then by Mr. Harold Murray, of Manchester, England. Mr. Mur-
ray's plant has a white stem and red arms. Professor Long also
advised me of a red Lysurus in Texas. We present two photographs,
one a stocky plant from England, the other a slender specimen from
the United States. We are told, however, that these same "stocky"
forms occur in the United States.

LYSURUS CLARAZIANUS (Fig. 42).— This was a small plant, de-
scribed from Argentina. It is red and small, but otherwise seems about the
same as the preceding.

LYSURUS SANCTAE-CATHERINAE (Fig. 43).— This was based on
a picture from Brazil. It seems to have the gleba in a globose mass on the
center of the apex of the stipe rather than surrounding the arms. The color
is red. It may be an Anthurus.

LYSURUS CRUCIATUS (Fig. 44.)— A very small species with four
arms, the gleba forming a ball on the top of the stem. It is only known from
the original collection, which was from French Guiana, and is preserved at
Paris. We present the original drawing in our illustration.

LYSURUS WOODII (Fig. 45).— This is a small, red species, imperfectly
known from South Africa. Our photograph is made from the cotype at Kew.
The arms are three or four and are "magnificent scarlet," the stem "waxy
yellow." The specimens are from Mr. Wood and are the same as those named
and figured by Kalchbrenner as Anthurus Woodii. While it is unsafe to draw
conclusions from dried specimens, we believe the species is a Lysurus entirely
distinct from the genus Anthurus and that Kalchbrenner misconceived and mis-
drew the illustration. We, therefore, present a photograph of the dried speci-
men, which though a very poor illustration is better than an inaccurate drawing.

UNNAMED SPECIES (Fig. 453).— We have received from F. M. Reader
what is surely an unnamed species from Australia. It is a very small species,
as will be seen by reference to our photograph, which is an enlargement four
diameters. The limb is four-angled, enlarged above, and bears an arm at each
angle. The color is red. The specimen sent us (in formalin.) had evidently
been cut in two pieces and these arms all broken off, so that we could not
make much of a picture of it. We think it will be recognized, if found agaia
by our Australian friends, and we do not name it. We hope some one in
Australia will give a good photograph of it from the fresh plant and give it
a name. We should be glad to have a perfect specimen in alcohol.

THE GENUS ANTHURUS.

Though largely confused with Lysurus, the genus Anthurus as
originally proposed is very distinct. The stem is a flaring tube, the
limb divided into segments, and it bears the gleba on the inner side
of these segments. But one species is satisfactorily known, and that
one is due to the work of Prof. D. McAlpine of Australia.

40

Fig. 46.

ANTHURUS ASEROEFORMIS.

Fig. 49.

ANTHURUS CALATHISCUS.
(The original drawing.)

ANTHURUS ASEROEFORMIS (Fig. 46) .—Professor Mc-
Alpine describes the plant as follows :

"Receptacle with hollow stem, expanding above into five arms, directed
upwards and outwards. Stem salmon pink, slightly darker at top, fully three
inches long, rugose with small depressions running more or less in lines and
slight ridges running crosswise, so that it looks as if divided into a series
of squares, about Y* inch in diameter towards the tapering base and % inch
at top. Arms three inches long, merging into stem and tapering to a point,
blood-red on inner face, convex and broken up into larger or smaller cavities,
on outer face there is a continuation of the color of the upper portion of the
stem and gradual darkening until toward the tip it is blood-red like inner
face with thickened, slightly raised margins and central furrow broken up into
small cavities.

Fig. 47.

ANTHURUS MUELLERIANUS.

Fig. 48.

ANTHURUS ARCHERI.

"Gleba blackish with tinge of bronze green, extending along the inner sur-
face of each arm, but not covering the slender tip.

"Volva somewhat cup-shaped, about as long as broad (i^ inches) dirty-
white, splitting at the apex, tapering towards the base and provided there with
turfs of elongated fibrous roots.

"Spores hyaline, cylindrical to elongated ellipsoid, rounded at both ends,
sometimes vacuolated but generally homogeneous contents, 6-8 x 2^-3 mic.,
occasionally 9 mic. long.

"A solitary specimen growing in a garden among violets, near Melbourne,
Victoria, April, 1907. Forwarded by C. French, Jr. It had a very disagreeable
smell. Owing to its fragile nature, one of the arms fell away and only the
arm to the right in the photograph shows the slender tip."

42

This description, taken in connection with the photograph that Pro-
fessor McAlpine sends, gives a perfect idea of the plant, and it is
the only Anthurus that is really known.

ANTHURUS MUELLERIANUS (Fig. 47)—Thisf the original «pecies
of the genus, is known only from a drawing supposed to be quite inaccurate
It was from Australia, and the color was described as yellowish-red and
shown bright red. I rather suspect that it was based on the same plant as
the preceding.

ANTHURUS ARCHERI (Fig. 48).— This is known only from a figure
and that is doubtful. It was from Tasmania. It seems from the figure to be
an Anthurus, but in the sectional drawing the arms are shown to be bifid and
it seems to incline toward the genus Aseroe.

ANTHURUS CALATHISCUS (Fig. 49)._The original of this species,
as far as I can learn, is a crude figure found in the herbarium of Montague
from Perrottet, India. I think it was published as Calathiscus Sepia, and if so,
then a most fantastic and imaginary figure was given of it. Perrottet gives
the color as "jaune pale." No similar plant has since been sent from India,
but his figure evidently is an Anthurus.11

Fig. 51.
ASEROE PENTACTINA.

Fig. 53a.

ASEROE PALLIDA.

THE GENUS ASEROE.

Stem tubular, abruptly spreading into a horizontal limb, which
is divided into a number of long, slender, usually bifid segments.

has embellished our phalloid literature, I have found no other evidence than the cut reproduced
Fig. 49. It has so little resemblance to the published figure that it does not seem possible to have
been the source. It was from "Perrottet, India," and on a sheet with two other sketches taken by
Perrottet to be different species, but which appear to me to be forms of the same. Montagne has en-

,

dorsed this sheet "Perrottet Calathiscus et Aseroe pentactina Endl.," and it therefore seems to be the
source of his "Calathiscus."

43

These are generally prolonged into long, slender points. The color
of most species is bright red, and they are among the most showy
phalloids. The genus is at home in Australia, where many forms
occur. It also grows in Java and the East. No species is known from
America or Europe, and it is vaguely known from Africa.12 The species

Tig. 50.

ASEROE RUBRA.

all are very similar and have been reduced to two by Professor Fischer.
However, the figures that are supposed to represent them seem so dif-
ferent that we would prefer to consider them distinct, at least until
more is known about them. We believe, however, that there are three
distinct species under which the forms should be arranged : Aseroe
rubra, which includes the Australian forms and has a narrow limb;
Aseroe Zeylandica, to which all the East Indian forms should be re-
ferred, and which has a broad limb ; Aseroe arachnoidea, which is quite
distinct from both the others.

12 At Berlin there is a very imperfect dried specimen of Aseroe from Africa!!
so poor that I would not wish to even venture on its form, but the occurrence of the
in Africa is not recorded, I think, and is of interest.

44

It is
genus

Fig. 55.

ASEROE ARACHNOIDEA.

Fig. 56.

ASEROE ARACH-
NOIDEA. (Section.)

Fig. 52.

ASEROE HOOKERI.

45

ASEROE RUBRA (Fig. 50). — This was the original form
known, and was from Australia. It has short, spreading rays. This
exact form does not appear to have reached Europe since, but ad-
ventitious plants which are exactly the same have appeared in the
hothouses at Kew.

Fig. 53.

ASEROE MUELLERIANA.

ASEROE PENTACTINA (Fig. 51).— From the specimens that reach
Europe this form seems to be the most common form in Australia. It has
a narrow limb and long, slender rays. The name, pentactina, referred to the
number (five) of the rays of the original specimen, but the number varies
and is of no importance.

ASEROE HOOKERI (Fig. 52).— This was a very small form with a
short stem and narrow rays that came from New Zealand. It is the smallest
form described and appears to me quite different from the others.

ASEROE MUELLERIANA (Fig. 53).— This form from Australia has a
broad limb and a general resemblance to Aseroe Zeylandica of Ceylon. How-

46

ever, the rays are shorter and differently disposed. I think it is known only
from the picture. It seems quite different in its broad lin-.b frmi tlic other
Australian forms, if any reliance can be placed on the picture.

ASEROE PALLIDA (Fig. 533).— At Berlin I found a dried specimen of
an Aseroe from New Caledonia sent by Monsieur Le Rat, with a drawing
(Fig. 533) that seems to be well made. It differs from the Australian form
not only in its narrow segments but pale coloration. The stem is "pure white."
the limb "pale rose." I think it is worthy of record as a marked form of this
variable species.

Fig. 54.
ASEROE ZEYLANDICA.

ASEROE ZEYLANDICA (Fig. 54).— This species is originally
from Ceylon and is the largest and most showy of the genus. 11*
broad limb is divided into a number of segments, and the whole pa
is bright red. It was collected many years ago in Java (and calk

47

Aseroe Jnnghuhnii), but is very rare there and was not found by
Penzig. It has recently been found again by Dr. Bernard, who has
kindly sent us the fine photograph which we publish.

ASEROE LYSUROIDES.— This was figured by Corda from specimens
from Australia. It has a long, slender stem and short, broad rays. Corda's
figures appear to me to represent two different genera, hence I do not repro-
duce it as I think there is surely something wrong about it.

ASEROE ARACHNOIDEA (Figs. 55 and 56).— This species
differs widely from all that precede. It has simple rays, not bifid,
as all others. The color is white: all others are red. It was based
on alcoholic material at Paris collected "sur fumier" in Cochin China,
by Dr. Harmand. It has since been found abundantly in Java by
Penzig and Dr. Bernard, though not on manure. The stem is hol-
low, and pervious at the top, and the arms crown the limb of the stem.

Fig. 60.

LATERNEA PUSILLA.
LATERNEA TRISCAPA. (From the type.)

THE GENUS LATERNEA.

This genus consists of columns (usually two to five) that are
united at the top and bear the gleba clinging to the under side. It
is chiefly an American genus, being very common in South America
and Southern United States. There is one record from Africa and
one species known from Japan.

LATERNEA COLUMNATA (Fig. 57 and 58).— Columns from
three to five, usually four. When perfectly developed there is a
groove on the outer surface. Color red, or perhaps also white. White
plants have been figured from Chile and Africa that are probably
the same thing. This is the original species of Laternea, and is the
most common one. It is abundant in Southern United States and
South America, and is also known from the West Indies and Hawaii.

LATERNEA TRISCAPA (Fig. 59).— This was the second species named,
and is known only from the original figure. It is very much the same as
Laternea columnata except its small size, and it may be only a small form.

48

V

Fig. 62.

LATERNEA ANGOLENSIS.

Pig. 61.

LATERNEA
RHACODES.

rig. 58.

LATERNEA
COLUMNATA.

49

It came from the West Indies. The figure shows only three columns, and
for a long time that was considered its specific character. It is well known,
however, that the number of columns varies in other species and undoubtedly
also in this.

LATERNEA PUSILLA (Fig. 60).— This is known from a single speci-
men from Cuba, preserved at Kew. The character of this specimen is the
two columns and its exceedingly small size. As Laternea pusilla has never
been found since and was never figured, we have used for our illustration n
photograph of the type specimen. When these small Laterneas are known
from more ample collections, it will probably not be possible to draw any line
between pusilla and triscapa and perhaps also columnata.

Fig.
LATERNEA SPEGAZZINI.

Fig. 57.

LATERNEA COLUMNATA.

LATERNEA RHACODES (Fig. 61).— In this species the inner
cells of the columns are torn and lacerated, and on that account has
been made into a new genus (Blumenavia). As the same character
is afforded by more than one Clathrus, which are not separated on this
account, we feel it better to include this in Laternea, with which it
otherwise agrees. Laternea rhacodes was originally from Brazil,
where it is reported to be common. It is not otherwise known.

LATERNEA ANGOLENSIS (Fig. 62).— This, from the picture, which is
all that is known about it, is very similar to columnata except that the columns
are more slender and reduced at the top, and the color is white. It is probably
only a white form of Laternea columnata. It is the only record of the genus

50

Laternea in Africa and was from Angola. The recently described Blumenavia
usambarensis from Africa is probably the same. The type is in alcohol at Berlin

LATERNEA SPEGAZZINI (Fig. 63).-This, which we know onlv from
a hgure, differs from Laternea columnata in having the surface covere'd with
papillate projections. It might well be made the type of a new genus As
far as known, it occurs only in Argentina, South America. The illustration
shows only three columns, but the number probably varies.

Fig. 64.

LATERNEA BICOLUMNATA.

LATERNEA BICOLUMNATA (Fig. 64) . — Receptacle con-
sists of two columns united at the top and free at the bottom. Col-
umns slightly compressed, cylindrical, tapering above. Gleba attached
to the under side of the columns near the apex. Color pale reddish.
This species is known only from Japan and is the only Laternea re-
corded from that part of the world. We are under obligations to
Professor Kusano for the photograph that we reproduce.

THE GENUS PSEUDOCOLUS.

The genus Pseudocolus consists of columns (three, as far as
known) which are united at the top and at the bottom are consoli-
dated into a stalk. In other words, it is a stipitate Laternea. The
best known species are from Java and Brazil. Other and less per-
fectly known species occur in Australia, Reunion Island (Africa).
Java, and Ceylon. All species of Pseudocolus appear to be very rare,
and most of them are only known from a single record.

5 5i

PSEUDOCOLUS GARCIAE (Fig. 65).— Receptacle consists
of three tapering columns, slightly united at the top and bearing the
gleba on the under side. Color, white. This is a rare species, known
only from Brazil (Moeller) and rare there, for Father Rick has never
found it.

Fig. 68.
JDOCC

PSEUDOCOLUS JAVANICUS. FUSIFORMIS.

Fig' 66' PSEUDOCOLUS

PSEUDOCOLUS JAVANICUS (Fig. 66).— From the illustra-
tion this seems to be very similar to the preceding species from Brazil.
However, this is of a pale red color and grows in Java. It is a very
rare plant and is only known from one specimen collected by Penzig.
We reproduce Penzig's drawing, which is enlarged twofold from
the plant.

PSEUDOCOLUS RUGULOSUS (Fig. 67).— Columns three, slender,
united at the apex and into a short stipe at the base. The inner side of the
columns are strongly rugulose, fluted. The stipe very short and included in
the volva. Color, red. All that is known of this species is a figure preserved
at Kew and made by Kurz in Java. It was referred to Laternea triscapa. If
it exists at all it must be quite rare, for neither Penzig ncr Dr. Bernard has
found it.

PSEUpOCOLUS FUSIFORMIS (Fig. 68).-This species is based en a
figure in the Museum at Paris, made on the Island of Reunion (near Mada-
gascar). The plant is red; otherwise, our photograph of this figure (Fie 68)
is all that is known about it. If the plant was correctly drawn, as it seems
to be, it appears to me to be very distinct from all the other specie's. Professor
Fischer based the name fusiformis on this figure, afterwards withdrew it re-
ferring the plant to Pseudocolus Javanicus of Java. That dees not seem 'pos-
sible to me.

Fig. 67.

PSEUDQCOLUS RUGULO3US.
(From the original sketch.)

Fig. 69.

PSEUDOCOLUS

ROTHAE.

(From the original

sketch.)

PSEUDOCOLUS ROTHAE (Fig. 69).— Columns three, slender, united
above and below into a short stipe which does not extend beyond the volva.
Color, rich orange. This species is represented at Kew by two collections from
Australia. It seems very similar to the preceding from Java, but is evidently
a much more slender species. As no other illustration of it is known, we give
a copy of a crude sketch by Bailey, sent with the plant.

Fig. 65.

PSEUDOCOLUS GARCIAE.

THE GENUS CLATHRUS.

This genus has a receptacle consisting of a simple "sessile" net-
work, bearing the gleba on the inner side. When young, the gleba
forms a mass, filling the center of the egg ; but as the plant expands,
the gleba deliquesces and remains attached to the inner surface of
the receptacle. The genus Clathrus as comprised in this pamphlet
consists of two very distinct genera. Clathrus (true), with the re-
ceptacle composed of large cells, and Ileodictyon, with the receptacle
formed of tubes. Clathrus cancellatus belongs to the former ; Clathrus
cibarius and gracilis to the latter. Where the other species belong
we do not surely know, and hence do not attempt to maintain them as
two genera.

CLATHRUS CANCELLATUS (Fig. 70).— Color, bright red.
Meshes of the network subequal. Receptacle subglobose, composed
of large cells, becoming torn and lacerate on the inner surface, the
outer surface smooth, even. This well-known species is a native of
Southern Europe. It is not rare in Italy and Southern France. It
is a plant of warm regions and does not occur in Northern Europe
except where the climate is modified by the Gulf Stream. It is
found rarely on the channel coast, both of France and England, and
even extends up into Holland. It occurs in Northern Africa, and has

54

Fig. 70.

CLATHRUS CANCELLATUS.

Fig. 71.
CLATHRUS AMERICANUS.

55

-J>

Fig. 74.

CLATHRUS
CAMKRUNENSIS.

been collected at a few stations in Florida and Georgia in the United
States. In our country it is rare, and only known with certainty
from the South.

CLATHRUS AMERICANUS (Fig-. 71).— Color, red. Recep-
tacle, elongated. Meshes subequal above, elongated below. Outer
surface slightly grooved, smooth. This is a species of Brazil and
the West Indies. It reached me first from Father Schupp, of Brazil,
who sent a photograph (Fig. 71) and a dried specimen. Then from

Fig. 73.

CLATHRUS PUSILLUS.

Fig. 72.

CLATHRUS TREUBII.

L. J. K. Brace, from the Bahamas, sent in liquid. In general form it
appears to be very much like Clathrus pusillus, of Australia, but ac-
cording to the original figure, that has much more slender branches.
At Berlin I found a specimen (unnamed) from Paraguay.

CLATHRUS TREUBEI (Fig. 72).— Color, bright red. Re-
ceptacle of large meshes above, below columned. The branches of the
receptacle are tubular, smooth externally and corrugated on the inner
surface. They are reduced in diameter above, and when old they

56

break apart, and the primary columns separate. Clathrus Treubei
was recently described by Dr. Bernard, from Java. At Upsala there
are alcoholic specimens collected in Java by E. Nyman and an old
specimen of the same collection was discovered at Berlin to be a new
species of Laternea (pentactina).

Fig. 74a.

CLATHRUS CRISPATUS.
(Egg.)

CLATHRUS PUSTLLUS (Fig. 73).— Color, bright ruby red.
Meshes subequal above, elongated below. Branches of the receptacle
wrinkled. This species is only known from the original collection
made on the Swan River, Australia, more than sixty years ago.
What is apparently a very good figure of it (Fig. 73) was given
by Berkeley, though it seems to me the branches of the receptacle
are more slender than is borne out by the specimens at Kew.

CLATHRUS CAMERUNENSIS (Fig. 74).— This species was described
from Camerun, Africa, and figured. The figure appears to be very much (he
same as Clathrus pusillus from Australia, but the African plant is said to be
dark olive and the Australian red. The type is in alcohol at Berlin. It seems
to be an Ileodictyon with tubular arms. The most marked feature of it to me
is the reduced diameter of the upper bars.

CLATHRUS CRISPATUS (Fig. 74a).— This species is only known from
the elevated regions of Ceylon and is imperfectly known from there. It was

57

originally sent to Europe (dried specimens) many years ago, and referred to
Clathrus cancellatus, to which it seems to have little resemblance. The net is
composed of broad, flattened bars which form small meshes. The color is red.
No photograph or drawing is known (in Europe) but it must be quite different
in appearance from Clathrus cancellatus. We reproduce a photograph of an
unopened egg. This has a tubercular surface, corresponding to the form of
the enclosed net, and is a character not seen at all in the European species.
At the British Museum there is a species from Yucatan ( !) that seems to be
this species. Mr. Fetch, who has rarely seen it, writes me that the bars are
flattened-triangular in section, the broad, flat surface exterior.

Fig. 76.

CLATHRUS CRISPUS.

Fig. 75.

CLATHRUS GUTTULATUS.

CLATHRUS GUTTULATUS (Fig. 75).— Color, bright red. Branches
of the net narrow, thin, smooth. They appear to be tubes. Color, bright red.
Nothing is known of this species excepting the original figure in the collection
of Fries. It was made by Oersted, from St. Thomas. The guttae appear to
me to be spots of white lead on the drawing, intended to show the porous
nature of the receptacle.

CLATHRUS CRISPUS (Fig. 76).— Color, salmon. Receptacle,
subglobose, with subequal meshes. Branches of the receptacle broad,

58

strongly wrinkled. This seerjis to be a frequent species in the West
Indies and is recorded also from Mexico and South America. Plumier.
two hundred years ago gave a crude but evident figure of it. Next
it seems to have been very characteristically figured by Turpin
(Fig. 76). It was sent to Berkeley from Uruguay. It has been re-
corded several times, mostly from the West Indies. No photograph
is known, but the original drawing seems characteristic.

|ft WV

$ Wit

X

Fig. 77.
CLATHRUS PSEUDOCRISPUS (reduced one-third).

CLATHRUS PSEUDOCRISPUS (Fig. 77)--A figure (Fig. 77) of what

is probably only a form of Clathrus crispus is found at Kevv from Ur .
Montego Bay, Jamaica. It differs from crispus, as is shown by the figure,
in having the meshes below elongated. Whether it is a distinct species, a d,s-
linct form, or whether crispus really has this character we do not 1
color as shown is dark red.

59

CLATHRUS PSEUDOCANCELLATUS.— This plant was named from
Central Africa. It was orange-red and described as having broad, flattened
branches. No figure has been given of it from which any idea whatever can
be gained of the general appearance of the plant, nor could I form a much
more definite idea from the types in alcohol at Berlin. They were probably
originally in formalin as they have lost all definite form.

Tig. 79.

CLATHRUS GRACILIS.

CLATHRUS CIBARIUS (Fig. 78).— Color, white. Recep-
tacle with smooth, tubular branches and large, pentagonal meshes.
Our figure (78) will give an idea of the general appearance of
this plant, but not of the size, for the photograph is evidently much
reduced. The plant is four or five inches in diameter. It is a very
common species in New Zealand, and it occurs rarely in Australia.
It also grows in Chile, and a curious form has been collected in
Brazil. It is said that the natives of New Zealand formerly em-
ployed the plant for food, hence the name.

CLATHRUS AFFINIS.— At the British Museum there is a specimen col-
lected by G. A. Ramage, Pernambuco, Brazil, which is certainly a distinct
form if not specifically distinct. It has the general appearance of Clathrus

60

Pig. 78.

CLATHRUS CIBARIUS.
(Reduced about one-half.)

6l

cibarius, but the arms of the upper meshes are narrower than those of the
lower, and the latter are somewhat columnar, so that the lower meshes are
elongated.

AFRICAN FORM(?).— At the British Museum there is a plant from
Africa which, if not a form of Clathrus cibarius, is very close. There is a
sketch with it which is yellowish (and I understand that the New Zealand
type form is white), but otherwise it seems to be the same.

CLATHRUS CHRYSOMYCELINUS.

Fig. 81.

CLATHRUS PREUSSII.

CLATHRUS GRACILIS (Fig. 79).— Color white or pale. Re-
ceptacle large, globose, with large meshes. The branches of the mesh
are flattened, very narrow and slender, and vary from 2 to 3 mm. in
breadth. Clathrus gracilis is the most common phalloid in Australia.
There are numerous collections at Kew, and it reaches me from sev-
eral collectors. It is very much like Clathrus cibarius of New Zealand,
in fact might be considered as a small form of it. It does not seem
to occur in New Zealand. It is reported from South Africa, and at

62

Pans there is a very poor specimen, which has been called Clathrus
Fischen, but which appears to be Clathrus gracilis. The specimen is
too poor to judge, however. Notwithstanding that Clathrus gracilis
is the most common phalloid in Australia, we know of no photograph
of it and have to resort to one made from alcoholic material, devoid
of volva, which gives only a vague idea of the plant.

CLATHRUS CHRYSOMYCELINUS (Fig. 80) .-Receptacle

white, with large, polygonal meshes; those below somewhat length-
ened. The receptacle arms are united at the base. Mvcelium de-
scribed as being bright golden yellow, hence the specific name This
species is only known from Brazil. Father Schupp finds it, and he
writes me the mycelium is not always yellow.

Fig. 82.

CLATHRUS DELICATUS.

CLATHRUS PREUSSII (Fig. 81).— This species from Kamerun, Africa,
i- one of the few white species of Clathrus known. The receptacle has broad,
Hat arms that are more narrow above. The figure which was published by
Fischer shows the plant with the volva cut away. It is only known from
the original collection in alcohol at Berlin. The bars of the network are
cellular (not tubular) and have a somewhat quadrilateral shape, different from
all other known species of Clathrus.

CLATHRUS DELICATUS (Fig. 82).— This unique little Clathrus is the
smallest of the genus and disputes with Mutinus xylogenus the distinction of
being the smallest phalloid known. It occurs only in Ceylon as far as known.
The color is white, and the structure of the arms is tubular, hence it should
be included in the genus Ileodictyon if taken out of Clathrus. The gleba is
collected in little globose masses at the nodes of the net.

63

THE GENUS SIMBLUM.

The genus Simblum can be described in a few words as being
a Clathrus on a stalk. In most of the species known the meshes are
more compact than is usual in Clathrus. The genus Simblum was

Fig. 87.

SIMBLUM MULLERI.

\

Fig. 83.

SIMBLUM PERIPHRAGMOIDES.

originally known from Mauritius, then from South America, Java,
and finally from the United States. At Kew we found an unnamed
species from Africa, and there is a doubtful one from Australia.
It can be divided into two series according to the color, yellow and
red, which seem distinct and do not run into each other. However,
the red series has pale or white forms.

64

Fig. 84.

SIMBLUM GRACILE.

Fig. 85.

SIMBLUM TEXENSE.

Fig. 86.

SIMBLUM SPHAEROCEPHALUM.
65

SIMBLUM PERIPHRAGMOIDES (Fig. 83).— Volva, white.
Stipe 3 to 4 inches long by 2 broad, hollow, striate, yellow. Receptacle
globose, with small meshes, yellow. This species, which was originally
from Mauritius, was sent to Hooker and published in 1831. It is
evidently rare in Mauritius, for Dr. O'Connor, who resides there and
has collected several other phalloids of this island, but lately found
it. The following species, which is common in Java, I at first thought
was distinct from its slender form, but at Upsala I have recently seen
a series of alcoholic specimens from Java, some so much like the
original specimens that I now think them to be one species.

Fig. 88.

SIMBLUM CLATHRATUM.

SIMBLUM GRACILE (Fig. 84).— This has all the characters of the
previous excepting the slender form. It is yellow, with a globose head of
small meshes. It is a very common species in Java, Ceylon, and India, and
has been reported from China. I am convinced, from an examination of a
series of alcoholic specimens from Java, at Upsala, that it can not be kept
distinct from the preceding species.

66

SIMBLUM TEXENSE (Fig. 85).— This species, which is only
known from Texas,, has the same yellow color character as the pre-
ceding. It differs in the nature of the network (best shown in our
figures) and in the clathrate portion abruptly contracted into the stipe.
An excellent account of it has been given by Professor Long.

SIMBLUM SPHAEROCEPHALUM (Fig. 86).— This species
differs from those that precede by being red, though pale or white
forms occur. It was first noted in South America, where it is an
extremely common plant. Then it was published from the United
States,13 where it is rare, and it reached me from the Bahamas. In
shape it is the same as Simblum Texense, and the photographs without
color notes could not be told apart.

SIMBLUM MULLERI (Fig. 87).— This species, which is known from a
drawing made from a dried specimen from Australia, is very different from
all others in its open network. In its general appearance it is close to Clathrus
pusillus, excepting that the clathrate portion is borne on a distinct though short
stem . When the phalloids of Australia are well known, it may be found that
Clathrus pusillus varies in this respect and that this is really only a stalked form.

SIMBLUM CLATHRATUM (Fig. 88).— Stem hollow, pale reddish tint,
2l/2 cm. thick x 7 cm. high. Receptacle a loose, clalhrate structure, with large
meshes to the net and slender branches. Color, bright red. The clathrate
portion is fragile and easily broken. The specimen grew in the botanical
garden at Old Calabar, Africa. It is the first red Simblum known from
Africa, although the original species of the genus came from Mauritius. It
was a yellow plant. The only similar plant known is Simblum sphaerocephalum
from America, which differs widely in having a compact net of small meshes.
The specimen and a colored drawing by J. W. Holland are at Kew.

THE GENUS COLUS.

This genus is a Clathrus supported on columns which are united
at the base into a stipe. Only one species is known, and that only
from the Mediterranean regions.

COLUS HIRUDINOSUS (Figs. 89 and 90).— This is a small
phalloid, that, as far as is known, grows only in the Mediterranean re-
gions. Originally from Corsica, it was named from Southern France.
It has been found in Algeria, and Father Torrend, of Portugal, has re-
cently discovered it abundant in the sand. In Corsica, the original
observer stated, it grew only on manure, but the other records are
from unnamed places. The color is red ; the other characters are all
those of the genus and are best shown in our photographs.

In some publications, the genus Coins includes plants that in my
opinion have very little resemblance or relation to the original species.
These we have separated under the name Pseudocolus.

13 The only stations known are Long Island, N. Y., Gerard ; Nebraska. J. M. Bates; Kansas E. E.
Bartholomew; Washington, D. C., W. H. Scudder; Talbot County, Maryland Chas. Mcllvaine.
When any one finds this rare plant in the United States I request that it be reported to me so that we

6 67

Fig. 89.

COLUS HIRU-
DINOSUS.

(Natural size.)

Fig. 90.

COLUS HIRUDINOSUS.

(Enlarged.)

THE GENUS KALCHBRENNERA.

This is a very peculiar genus, known only from South Africa,
and but one species. It has a stipe bearing a clathrate structure
similar to the genus Simblum, bxit from the net proceed large, knobbed
projections.

KALCHBRENNERA CORALLOCEPHALA (Figs. 91 and
92). — The only species grows in South Africa, and there appears to
be rather a frequent plant. It is a very showy plant, of a bright red
color in all its parts. The gleba covers the outer portion of the net
and to an extent hides the network. It was a number of years before
its correct structure was known, and it was Kalchbrenner who made
a good picture of it and first showed it.

Fig. 91.

KALCHBRENNERA CORALLO-
CEPHALA.

69

Pig. 92.

KALCHBRENNERA CORALLOCEPHALA.
(Section.)

RELATED PLANTS.

It is a disputed question whether Phallogaster saccatus is a phalloid or not.
It has no volva as other phalloids have, hence is excluded by some who are
theorizing on such things. I do not believe that any one familiar with the
fresh plant will ever place it anywhere except with the phalloids. It has the
same greenish, fetid gleba that is associated with the phalloids, the same spores
and basidia, and it deliquesces in the same way. It seems to me that its relations
are entirely with the phalloids, notwithstanding it has no volva.

THE GENUS PHALLOGASTER.

Plants devoid of a volva, the gleba borne in the inner tissue.
Peridium white, smooth. In ripening the inner tissue and gleba deli-
quesce, and the latter adheres to the inner side of the peridium, which
breaks irregularly and exposes the adhering gleba.

Fig. 93.

PHALLOGASTER SACCATUS.

rig. 94.

PHALLOGASTER SACCATUS.
(After dehiscence.)

PHALLOGASTER SACCATUS (Figs. 93 and 94).— This spe-
cies occurs only in the United States and Canada, as far as known,
and it is a rare plant there. It has only been known for a few years.
I think there can be no trouble in identifying it from our photographs
Another species has been recently published, which appears
be rather a depauperate form.

APPENDIX I.
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION.

The real study of the phalloids, as I view it, is the correct characters of
the species, the simplest grouping of them into genera, and their distribution.
We present a synopsis of the number of phalloids known to occur in various
countries, and where the same species occurs in different countries it is in-
cluded in each. We include as different phalloids all the various forms named
in this pamphlet, and all the alleged species so named, whether doubtful or
well known.

General Distribution.

When the subject is well known, I think, it will be found that several
species are of very wide distribution, but at present we only know two.

Phallus indusiatus occurs without doubt in every tropical country of the
world. We give on page 18 the countries from which we have seen specimens,
and the list does not embrace perhaps half of the countries where it occurs.

Phallus rubicundus (under the names aurantiacus, gracilis, etc.) also seems
to occur in most warm countries.

W
c

North
America.

|!

South
America.

Australia and
New Zealand.

1

if

' I

s!

g£
• g.

East Indies.

Anthurus,
Aseroe

!••

3
6

I

i

2

2

2

Clathrus,
Clautriavia,
Colus,

j

1 •;

I

4

5

3
i

4
i

2

I

I

I

Floccomutinus,
Itajahya,
Jansia,
Kalchbrennera,
I/aternea,
L/ysurus,
Mutinus
Phallogaster

i
i

I
I

3
i

3

3
3
3

i
i(?)

2

3

i

i
i
i

I
I

I

I
I
2

2

3

Phallus
Pseudocojus,
Simblum,

Total,

2

6

5

2

14 "

2
I
10

8

i
i

25

IO

I
I

31

6
i

2

*9

3

12

5
12

9

2

I

21

Europe.

There are but six phalloids in Europe (including one form). Phallus
impudicus is the most common and widespread. The form Phallus imperialis
is rare and local. Mutinus caninus is not rare. Clathrus cancellatus is of a
southern range. It occurs mostly in southern France, Italy, etc. Colus hirudi-
nosus is confined to the Mediterranean region. It occurs in Corsica, Southern
France, Portugal. Lysurus borealis is probably an introduced species. It is
known from one collection in Germany and two in England.

United States and Canada.

We have fourteen phalloids in our country. Phallus Ravenelii and Phallus
duplicatus are the most frequent. The form Phallus imperialis, which with
us replaces Phallus impudicus of Europe, is of a Western range, found in
California, Colorado, and Texas. But one Eastern station is known, Wash-
ington. D. C. Mutinus elegans is our most common Mutinus in rich woods.
Mutinus caninus is an Eastern species, and Mutinus Ravenelii is local and
rare. Laternea columnata is common in the South, and Clathrus cancellatus
is very rare and only known with certainty from the South. Phallus rubicundus
seems to be fairly common in the South. Simblum sphaerocephalum is very
rare. A list of known stations is given on page 67. Simblum Texense is
known only from Texas. Lysurus borealis seems to be an introduced plant.
Of late years it has been found a number of times, chiefly in the East and
in cultivated stations. Phallogaster saccatus is of rare occurrence. In addition
I have a specimen in alcohol from Florida, species not sure, but probably
Phallus gracilis.

West Indies.

The phalloids of the West Indies are not well known. Undoubtedly when
well observed, several of the Brazilian species will be found in the West
Indies. Clathrus crispus (and a doubtful form, pseudocrispus) : Clathrus
Americanus, recently found in the Bahamas by Mr. Brace; Clathrus gut-
tulatus, known only from an old drawing; Phallus indusiatus, common; Phallus
rubicundus, probably common ; Laternea columnata, common ; Laternea pusilla.
known from one collection ; Laternea triscapa, known only from an old draw-
ing, and Simblum sphaerocephalum, recently collected in the Bahamas by
Mr. Brace.

South America.

Most excellent work has recently been done on the phalloids of Brazil
by Moeller, and to this work is due most of our knowledge of South American
phalloids. He has published in a superb manner Clathrus chrysomycelinus,
Pseudocolus Garciae, Laternea columnata, Laternea rhacodes, Mutinus bambusi-
nus, Phallus subtilis, Phallus glutinolens, Phallus indusiatus (and a form,
Moelleri), Phallus callichrous (which is probably only a color form of in-
dusiatus), and Itajahya galericulata, a genus only known from South America.

Simblum sphaerocephalum is a most common phalloid in South America,
but does not seem to have been, found, by Professor Mpeller. Clathrus Amer-
icanus is a recent species from Rev. F. A, Schupp, Brazil.

Rev. J. Rick finds in his locality (Sao Leopolda) the following: Simblum
sphaerocephalum, Phallus indusiatus, Pseudocolus Garciae, Laternea columnata,
Laternea rhacodes, and Clathrus Americanus.

There have been several imperfectly known phalloids from South America.
We would list Phallus Farlowii, Mutinus australis, Lysurus Sanctae-Catherinae,
Phallus roseus (a form of indusiatus), Mutinus xylogenus, Lysurus cruciatum,
Phallus campanulatus, Lysurus Clarazianus, Clathrus affinis (a form of cibarius,
known only from a specimen in the British museum), Laternea Spegazzini,
and Laternea crispus. In addition, several have been proposed by Spegazzini,
but they are mostly only word-descriptions, and nothing can be told about them.
For me an unillustrated phalloid has no place excepting in the rejected columns.
There has also been a "new genus," Alboffiella, illustrated by Spegazzini. Pro-
fessor Fischer has suggested, not without reason it seems to me, that it was
based on a Phallus with an accidental volva cap. Robert E. Fries suggests
it was based on Itajahya galericulata. If true, in either case, the work was
very poorly done.

73

Australia and New Zealand.

I consider the phalloids of Australia and Xew Zealand for the most part
very imperfectly and inaccurately known. The new species were mostly pro-
posed forty or fifty years ago and illustrated by figures reconstructed from
dried specimens, often inaccurate it seems to me, and nothing since has been
learned of them. The subject has gotten into such a condition that the local
workers in these countries seem to be able to make but very little of their
species, and the result is there have been very few original papers by the
mycologists of these countries. It is time our friends there observed their
phalloids and gave us good accounts and photographs of them. If Australian
mycologists will take as a model the photographs and account given on page
42 by Professor D. .McAlpine, of Anthurus aseroeformis, and supply similar
photographs and accounts, it will only be a few years until we have a much
better knowledge of the subject.

The two most frequent phalloids are Clathrus cibarius and Clathrus gracilis.
the former in New Zealand, the latter in Australia. Neither has been satis-
factorily illustrated. Anthurus aseroeformis, a rare species but well known,
due to Professor McAlpine. Phallus indusiatus is a frequent plant, but the
forms and color forms are not worked out. The genus Aseroe is at home in
Australia. It seems to take very different forms, but their value in classifica-
tion is not known. With the -exception of the above, I consider all the other
Australian species more or less doubtful and little known, viz : Phallus im-
pudicus, Phallus rubicundus, Phallus multicolor, Phallus callichrous, Phallus
Rochesterensis, Phallus discolor, Phallus calyptratus, Phallus retusus, Phallus
quadricolor, Mutinus pentagonus, Mutinus curtus, Mutinus papuasius, Jansia
annulata, Lysurus Australiensis, Lysurus (unnamed), Anthurus Muellerianus,
Anthurus Archeri, Aseroe (all the five recorded forms, rubra, pentactina,
Hookeri, Muelleriana, lysuroides), Laternea columnata (very ??), Pseudocplus
Rothae, Clathrus pusillus, Simblum Mulleri. In addition, there is a curious
species, Clautriavia Lauterbachii, only known from an egg from the neighbor-
ing island of New Guinea, and a pale Aseroe (pallida) is recorded from New
Caledonia.

Samoa.

I have spent two winters in Samoa and have hunted the fungi thoroughly.
I am satisfied that Phallus indusiatus is the only common phalloid that grows on
the island, and it is not at all rare. In the museum at Berlin is a specimen labeled
Clathrus gracilis (and it seems to be correct), also a Mutinus (unnamable).
Both genera must be very rare in Samoa, as I found neither.

Africa.

Many years ago Simblum periphragmoides was well illustrated from
Mauritius, and was only recently found again. A slender form is very
frequent in the East Indies. Kalchbrennera corallocephala, a most striking
species, was well illustrated by Kalchbrenner thirty years ago. Phallus in-
dusiatus is a common species and has reached me several times from Africa.
Colus hirudinosus occurs in North Africa. Lysurus Woodii, Laternea Ango-
lensis, Phallus subacutus, and Phallus canariensis were imperfectly published
years ago, and nothing has been added to them since.

In recent years Africa has been a fertile field for "new species," but the
work has not been done as it should have been. Such work would have
passed forty years ago, but it is out of date now. The following have been
added, mostly in this manner, in comparatively recent years : Floccomutinus
Zenkeri, Phallus rubicundus (?), Clathrus camerunensis, Clathrus pseudocan-
cellatus, Clathrus Preussii, Clathrus gracilis (?), Simblum clathratum, Pseudo-
colus fusiformis, Phallus callichrous, Clathrus cibarius (?). Fine specimens of
many of these are in alcohol in the museum at Berlin.

74

Mr. Chas. O'Connor has been observing the phalloids of Mauritius He
finds the only common one to be Phallus gracilis. More rarely he has observed
Phallus indusiatus and Phallus Mauritianus, a related plant. He has only re-
cently rediscovered Simblum periphragmoides which was originally from
Mauritius, but is very rare there.

Ceylon.

For many years we have had a very imperfect knowledge of the phalloids
of Ceylon, but a very recent paper by T. Fetch has set the matter right. The
following species occur in Ceylon : Jansia rugosa (rare, and considered by
Fetch to be Mutinus proximus), Mutinus proximus (known only from dried
specimens and sketch), Phallus tenuis (only previously known from Ceylon
from dried specimen at Kew, but recently again reported from Ceylon),
Phallus indusiatus, the most common phalloid and takes many color forms,
viz: callichrous and multicolor), Clautriavia merulina (common in the Botanic
Gardens at Peradeniya), Simblum gracile, common, Lysurus Gardner! (rare
in Ceylon, but most abundantly represented in the museums at Kew, there
being 25 specimens), Aseroe Zeylandica, rare in the elevated regions, Aseroe
arachnoidea, very rare. In addition the unique little Clathrus delicatus is only
known from Ceylon.

India.

Seventy years ago Perrottet sent Montague a few phalloid sketches and
dried specimens on which were based Phallus rubicundus (published as
aurantiacus), Anthurus Calathiscus (supposed to have been very inaccurately
published). In addition a few specimens of Phallus indusiatus have reached
Europe from India, and these are all, I think, that are known from India.
At the British Museum there are ten times as many specimens of extinct
elephant remains from India as there are of the live phalloids that every
naturalist in India must observe.

Mr. Hutchins writes me from North Bengal that Phallus indusiatus is
common, but is the only phalloid he finds. Mr. G. H. Krumbiegel sent me
from North Bengal a dried phalloid which, while I would not attempt to
reconstruct it, I recognize as a genus unknown.

Java.

From no country in the world have we had a better account of the
phalloids than from Java, which was published by Penzig. The following were
well illustrated and described by him : Mutinus bambusinus, Mutinus Fleischeri,
Jansia elegans, Jansia rugosa, Phallus tenuis, Phallus costatus (form?),
Phallus favosus (form?), Phallus indusiatus, Clautriavia merulina, Phallus
multicolor, Simblum gracile (form), Pseudocolus Javanicus, Aseroe arachnoidea.

Dr. Chas. Bernard has given us a good photograph and account of Clathrus
Treubei, and has sent me a collection of the Javanese species in alcohol, from
which some good photographs have been made.

Aseroe Zeylandica (under the name Junghuhnii) was published from Java
many years ago, but is very rare and only rediscovered by Dr. Bernard recently.
Pseudocolus rugulosus is based on an old drawing from Java, and no specimen
is known. From the neighboring islands, Mutinus borneensis is vaguely de-
scribed from Borneo and Phallus celebicus from the Celebes.

Dr. Chas. Bernard gives the following synopsis of the relative frequency
of the phalloids he has observed in Java: Mutinus bambusinus, Clautriavia
merulina, Phallus indusiatus, and Simblum gracile are common throughout
the season, though more abundant, of course, during the rainy season. Aser
arachnoidea, Jansia elegans, Jansia rugosa, Phallus multicolor, and Clathr
Treubei are rarer species and will probably only be found during the rainy
season. Aseroe Zeylandica is a very rare phalloid and only recently rediscoverc

75

Japan.

An account of the phalloids of Japan was published in Mycological Notes,
page 400. It was based on notes, drawings, and specimens from Professors
Kusano, Gono, and Yasuda. The following were included : Phallus indusiatus,
Phallus impudicus, Phallus rugulosus, Phallus tenuis (rare), Jansia boninensis
(as Mutinus), Lysurus Mokusin, and Laternea bicolumnata. In addition, Phallus
rubicundus under the name aurantiacus has been said to grow in Japan.

China.

Little is known as to the phalloids of China, although Lysurus Mokusin
from China was among the first foreign phalloids figured.

Some alcoholic specimens were sent to Patouillard at Paris a few years
ago from Tonkin, and the following species recorded : ' Aseroe Zeylandica,
Phallus indusiatus, Phallus gracilis, Mutinus b-ambusinus, Mutinus minimus,
Mutinus borneensis.

APPENDIX II.

LOST, STRAYED, OR STOLEN.

The following phalloids have not been heard from since they were originally
exploited and grave fears are entertained as to their survival. Vague rumors
have been circulated of one or two of them having been seen, but when traced
to the source have usually resulted from a mistaken identification. Any one
noticing a stray phalloid in their neighborhood is requested to seize it and send
it in with such notes and marks as may lead to its identification.

Whence Exploited

Has not been heard from for

Anthurus Miillerianus

Australia

Thirty years.

Anthurus Archeri

Australia

Fifty years.

Anthurus Calathiscus

India

Sixty-eight years.

Clathrus pusillus

Australia

Sixty-five years.

Laternea pusilla

Cuba

Forty years.

Laternea triscapa

West Indies

Eighty-seven years.

Laternea angolensis

Africa

Forty years.

Lysurus cruciatus

French Guiana

Sixty-five years.

Lysurus Clarazianus

South America

Thirty-six years.

Lysurus Sanctae Catherinae . .

South America

Twenty years..

Lysurus Woodii

South Africa

Thirty years.

Mutinus curtus

Australia

Sixty-five years.

Mutinus papuasius

Australia

Thirty years.

Mutinus discolor

Australia

Thirty years.

Mutinus xylogenus

French Guiana

Fifty-five years.

Phallus Daemonum

Amboy

One hundred and

sixty-six years.

Phallus quadricolor

Australia

Twenty-six years.

Phallus calyptratus

Australia

Twenty-six years.

Phallus retusus

Australia

Twenty-five years.

Phallus subucnlatus

Xorth Africa

Sixty years.

Pseudocolus fusiformis

Reunion

Thirty years.

Simblum Mulleri

\ustralia

Twenty years.

76

APPENDIX III.

SYNONYMS.

There have been nearly three hundred names proposed for phalloids and
only about one hundred have been retained in this pamphlet. The other two-
thirds are, in our opinion, superfluous. It is an easy matter to propose a
new name, but when once proposed it is impossible to ever get rid of it.
Writers can refer it to "synonymy" all they please, but the next man that
comes along has to dig it up and go all over it again, for no two men ever
agree as to all the details, and each man is entitled to his own opinion.

Many of the following names are the discoveries made by those who
discover "new species," which seem to me to have been "new" chiefly to the
discoverer. A large part of the synonyms are from changing plants from
one genus to another or making new genera out of sections of old genera.
Personally we do not maintain many of these innovations, for the old estab-
lished genera seem better to us. Of the new genera proposed in tin- la>t
twenty years we only maintain Itajahya, Jansia, Phallogaster, Clautriavia, Flocco-
mutinus, and Pseudocolus. (The latter we had the assurance to propose our-
selves.) Professor Fischer has worked over this same ground and reduced many
of these same names to synonymy, and while we agree with him in many in-
stances we have copied him in none, for in every case we have looked up the
evidence and formed our own opinion. We have not been as free as he in
reducing species, for perhaps twenty names recognized as good in this pamphlet
Professor Fischer puts in synonymy. While we suspect many of these have
little value, we give them, in all instances, the benefit of the doubt.

There is one class of "new species" exploiters that I have not bothered
much with — those who propose new species without illustrating them. In
a subject such as the phalloids, where a good illustration tells niost of the
story, there is no excuse for any one to try to describe a phalloid in words.
It ought to be a recognized crime, with a heavy penalty. Such species are
listed here as "Nomina nuda." The phalloid fakers who fake up pictures
are perhaps worse. The following names are those which in our opinion
should be placed in synonymy and the reasons.

Anthurus australiensis See Lysurus.

Anthurus borealis See Lysurus.

Anthurus Clarazianus See Lysurus.

Anthurus cruciatus See Lysurus.

Anthurus Sanctae Catherinae See Lysurus.

Anthurus trifidus Nomen nudum.

Anthurus Woodii See Lysurus.

Aporophallus subtilis See Phallus.

Alboffiella argentina Supposed to be a break.

Aseroe actinobolus =Aseroe pentad ina.

' Aseroe Ceylanica See Aseroe Zeylandica.

Aseroe Calathiscus See Anthurus.

Aseroe corrugata Xomen nudum.

Aseroe Junghuhnii =Aseroe Zeylandica.

Aseroe multiradiata =Aseroe Zeylandica probably.

Aseroe viridis =Aseroe Hooken.

Aserophallus cruciatus See Lysurus.

Rlumenavia rhacodes See Laternea.

Hlumcnavia usambarensis =Laternea angolensis( ?).

Calathiscus Sepia See Anthurus Calathiscus.

Calathiscus Puiggarii Xomen nudum.

Caromyxa elegans See Mutinus

Clathrella camerunensis See Clathrus.

Clathrella crispa See Clathrus.

Clathrella chrysomycelina See Clathrus.

Clathrella delicata See Clathrus.

77

Clathrella Muelleri See Simblum.

Clathrella pseudocancellata Nomen nudum.

Clathrella Preussii See Clathrus.

Clathrella pusilla See Clathrus.

Clathrella Treubei See Clathrus.

Clathrus angolensis See Laternea.

Clathrus albidus u=Clathrus gracilis.

Clathrus australis Nomen nudum.

Clathrus Baumii Nomen nudum.

Clathrus Berkeleyi =Laternea pusilla.

Clathrus Brasiliensis :=Laternea columnata.

Clathrus columnatus See Laternea.

Clathrus colonnarius ='Laternea columnata.

Clathrus Fischeri =Clathrus gracilis (?).

Clathrus hirudinosus See Colus.

Clathrus intermedius Nomen nudum.

Clathrus parvulus Too poorly illustrated.

Clathrus pscudocancellatus Nomen nudum.

Clathrus Tepperianus =Clathrus gracilis.

Clathrus triscapus See Laternea.

Clathrus trilobatus z=Laternea columnata.

Colus fusiformis See Pseudocolus.

Colus Garciae See Pseudocolus.

Colus Gardner! See Lysurus.

Colus Javanicus See Pseudocolus.

Colus Muelleri See Simblum.

Colus Rothae See Pseudocolus.

Colonnaria truncata Rafinesque's ravings.

Colonnaria urceolata Rafinesque's ravings.

Corynites brevis =Mutinus Ravenelii.

Corynites Curtisii — Mutinus elegans.

Corynites elegans See Mutinus.

Corynites Ravenelii See Mutinus.

Cryptophallus albiceps i=Phallus imperialis.

Cynophallus bambusianus See Mutinus.

Cynophallus caninus See Mutinus.

Cynophallus papuasius See Mutinus.

Dictybole texensis A phalloid fake.

Dictyophallus aurantiacus ^Phallus rubicundus.

Dictyophallus discolor See Phallus.

Dictyophora bicampanulata =Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora brasiliensis ^Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora Braunii =Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora callichrous See Phallus.

Dictyophora campanulata =Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora chlorocephala =Phallus callichrous.

Dictyophora collaris =Phallus duplicatus.

Dictyophora Daemonum See Phallus.

Dictyophora duplicata See Phallus.

Dictyophora echinata =Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora Farlowii See Phallus.

Dictyophora irpicina =Clautriayia merulina.

Dictyophora Lilloi = Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora merulina See Clautriavia.

Dictyophora multicolor See Phallus.

Dictyophora nana = Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora phalloidea =Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora radicata =Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora rosea =±Phallus indusiatus (form).

Dictyophora speciosa See Phallus indusiatus.

Dictyophora subuculata See Phallus.

78

Dictyophora tahitensis =Phallus indusiatus.

Echinophallus Lauterbachii See Clautriavia.

Floccomutinus Nymanianus =Jansia rugosa.

Foetidaria coccinea =Simblum sphaerocephalum.

Hymenophallus alboindusiatus =Phallus indusiatus.

Hymenophallus brasiliensis =Phallus indusiatus.

Hymenophallus duplicatus See Phallus.

Hymenophallus Hadriani =Phallus impudicus.

Hymenophallus indusiatus See Phallus.

Hymenophallus radicatus = Phallus indusiatus.

Hymenophallus roseus = Phallus indusiatus (form).

Hymenophallus speciosus =Phallus indusiatus.

Hymenophallus subuculatus See Phallus.

Hymenophallus tahitensis := Phallus indusiatus.

Hymenophallus togatus = Phallus duplicatus.

Hymenophallus tunicatus =Phallus indusiatus.

Ileodictyon cibarium See Clathrus.

Ileodictyon gracile See Clathrus. •

Ithyphallus aurantiacus =Phallus rubicundus.

Ithyphallus Balansoe =?Phallus rubicundus.

Ithyphallus calyptratus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus campanulata See Phallus.

Ithyphallus canariensis See Phallus.

Ithyphallus celebicus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus coralloides =Phallus rubicundus.

Ithyphallus costatus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus cucullatus = Phallus Ravenelii.

Ithyphallus favosus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus glutinolens .... See Phallus.

Ithyphallus impudicus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus Lauterbachii See Clautriavia.

Ithyphallus Muellerianus = Phallus retusus.

Ithyphallus Novae Hollandiae ='PhaHus gracilis.

Ithyphallus purpuratus =Phallus imperialis.

Ithyphallus quadricolor See Phallus.

Ithyphallus Ravenelii See Phallus.

Ithyphallus retusus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus rubicundus See Phallus.

Tthyphallus rugulosus See Phallus.

Ithyphallus sanguineus =<Phallus rubicundus'

Ithyphallus tenuis See Phallus.

Jansia Xymaniann = Jansia rugosa.

Jansia Zenkeri See Floccomutinus.

Kalchbrennera Tuckii ^Kalchbrennera corallc ccphala

Kirchbaumia imperialis See Phallus.

Laternea australis Nomen nudum.

Laternea pentactina r=effete Clathrus Treubu.

Lysurus Archeri See Anthurus.

Lysurus argentinus Nomen nudum.

Lysurus aseroeformis See Anthurus.

Lysurus Beauvaisi =Lysurus Mokusm.

Lysurus corallocephalus See Kalchbrennera.

Lysurus pentactinus =Anthurus Archeri.

Lysurus Texensis Nomen nudum.

Mutinus annulatus See Jansia.

Mutinus boninensis See Jansia.

Mutinus bovinus =Mutinus elegans.

Mutinus brevis =Mutinus Ravenelii.

Mutinus Curtisii .- =MurintB elegans.

Mutinus discolor See Phallus.

Mutinus elegans (of Java only) See Jansia.

79

Mutinus Muelleri =Mutinus bambusinus.

Mutinus Nymanianus ±=Jansia rugosa.

Mutinus proximus Xomen nudum.

Mutinus proximus (in sense of Fetch) .=Jansia rugosa.

Mutinus Watsoni Xomen nudum.

Mutinus Zenkeri See Floccomutinus.

Omphallophallus Muellerianus = Phallus retusus.

Omphallophallus retusus See Phallus.

Phallogaster whitei =depauperate Phallogaster saccatus.

Phallus aurantiacus =Phallus rubicundus.

Phallus bambusinus See Mutinus.

Phallus brasiliensis =Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus caninus See Mutinus.

Phallus collaris = Phallus duplicatus.

Phallus curtus See Mutinus.

Phallus foetidus = Phallus impudicus.

Phallus Hadriani Based on a freak.

Phallus irpicinus =Clautriavia merulina.

Phallus inodoratus = Phallus impudicus.

Phallus iosmos =:Phallus impudicus.

Phallus merulinus See Clautriavia.

Phallus Mokusin See Lysurus.

Phallus Muellerianus = Phallus retusus.

Phallus Novae Hollandiae =Phallus gracilis.

Phallus purpuratus =Phallus imperialis.

Phallus radicatus = Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus sanguinei's =Phallus rubicundus ( ?).

Phallus senegalensis ^Imagination chiefly.

Phallus speciosns = Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus tahitensis =Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus truncatus =Mutinus unknown.

Phallus tunicatus =!Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus Watsoni Nomen nudum.

Phallus xylogenus See Mutinus.

Protubera Maracuja (Not for me a phalloid.)

Satyrus rubicundus See Phallus.

Simblum australe =Simblum sphaerocephalum.

Simblum flavescens ='Siniblum gracile.

Simblum Lorentzii = Simblum sphaerocephalum.

Simblum pilidiatum = Simblum sphaerocephalum.

Simblum rubescens — Simbium sphaerocephalum.

Sophronia brasiliensis = Phallus indusiatus.

Staurophallus senegalensis =;Something unknown.

Xylophallus xylogenus See Mutinus.

80

APPENDIX IV.

LIST OF PHALLOIDS IX THE MUSEUMS.

All specimens are not listed, for some are so uncertain that I feel they
should not be recorded. In case a plant has been named from these specimens,
I sometimes record it under this name, even if I do not maintain it as a
valid species.

KEW, EXGLAXD.

Phallus multicolor, 3 collections. Australia — Phallus naiins. type. Andaman
Island — Phallus indusiatus, Australia, Africa. British Guiana. Uganda, India,
Ceylon, Java, Brazil, Mexico, Surinam Cape, several specimens from each
country, also Cuba (? depauperate), Australia (var. Rochesterensis)— Phallus
duplicatus, Carolina — Phallus Ravenelii, Connecticut — Phallus truncate. \» -:r
specimens, and a drawing from which it appears to me to be rather a Mutinus —
Phallus rubicundus, Southern United States, several — Phalli's 'ruliicundu- < a-
aurantiacus), several from Australia and the form gracilis — Phallus inipudicu-.
Australia, one only from Bailey and doubtful, England several (one the type
of iosmos), East Indies but very ??, France, Germany — Phallus tennis. Ceylon,
named Phallus pallidus by Berkeley but never published — Phallus aurantiacus,
co-type, ex Montague — Phallus gracilis, South Africa — Mutinus curtus, Australia,
type — Mutinus elegans (type of Corynites Curtisii) — Mutinus Ravenelii, type,
one with a short apex called brevis — Mutinus bambusinus, nice drawing fn.m
Kurz, I think ; Java, also dried from Java, also adventitious in hothouses,
England — Mutinus caninus, a number from England — Mutinus proximus. type,
Ceylon, poor — Mutinus pentagonus (labeled Australiensis) also labeled pen-
tagonus fram Bailey, Australia — Kalchbrennera corallocephala, South Africa,
collection and also Kalchbrenner's fine drawing14 — Simblum gracile, Ceylon,
also several specimens from Kurz. Java, and a nice drawing originally named
"Thyridocephalus flavescens. Mihi" — Simblum sphaerocephalum, Brazil, Glazion
(labeled Simblum Brasiliense, also drawing of the type of S. pilidiatum ) —
Simblum periphragmoides, type in good condition, Mauritius in Hooker's her-
barium— Clathrus pusillus, type, Australia — Pseudocolus rugulosus, type drawing
ex Kurz, Java, labeled Clathrus triscapus — Pseudocolus Rothae, two collections
and sketch from Bailey — Laternea columnata, Brazil, also (very ???) from AM--
tralia, also Cuba, the latter more slender, also several from the United States—
Laternea pusilla, type, Cooke — Clathrus cancellatus, England, France— Clathrus
pseudccrispus type drawing ex McCatty. Jamaica, also poor specimens— Clathrus
crispatus ex Thwaite, Ceylon (published as cancellatus) — Clathrus cibarius,
about a dozen collections, all from Xew Zealand excepting one from Chiloe,
an island off the coast of Chile— Clathrus gracilis, several, all from Aus-
tralia—Clathrus delicatus, type, Ceylon— Clathrus crispus, Cuba, San Domingo,
Uruguay— Simblum clathratum, type drawing and specimens, Old Calabar,
Africa ex J. H. Holland— Lysurus Gardneri, abundant types, Ceylon— Coins
hirudinosus, Corsica, Alpes Maritimes— Lysurus Australiensis, type, Australia—
Lysurus Woodii, South Africa ex Wood, and same as co-type of Anthurus
Wopdii — Aseroe Zeylandica, type, Ceylon— Aseroe rubra, several from Aus-
tralia— Aseroe Hookeri, type, New Zealand.

BRITISH MUSEUM, LOXDOX.

Phallus indusiatus from Philippines, Angola (Africa), China, Ceylon. India,
Borneo, and St. Vincent (the latter a small form =ftana)— Phallus mult:
color, type with the original colored sketch and also a colored sketch by Broor
—Phallus impudicus, several exsiccated from Europe, also specimens from
Britain— Phallus tenuis, Ceylon— Phallus quadricolor, type— Phallus calyptratus,
type— Phallus Ravenelii from Ravenel with his original notes-

14 " The Kalchbrennera is very rare. Only twelve specimens have been found in five yeart."-
Extract from letter from MacOwan.

Si

tiacus, Australia — Mutinus caninus, photo ex. Krieger, also several specimens
from England and the continent — Mutinus elegans, sketch from Morgan,
labeled Ravenelii — Mutinus Ravenelii with a letter from Ravenel stating that
the plant has been mis-cited in Grevillea (which is true) — Mutinus proximus,
drawing by Broom — Kalchbrennera corallocephala, original description but no
specimen from Welwitsch, drawing as reproduced in Trans. Linn. Soc. —
Simblum gracile, Ceylon — Laternea columnata, abundant specimen from Ravenel
— Laternea Angolensis, original description and drawing (no specimen) from
Welwitsch. It was described as "splendida albida" — Simblum Muelleri (?)
poor, Australia — Clathrus cancellatus, several specimens from Europe — Clathrus
delicatus, co-type, Ceylon — Clathrus gracile, co-type, Australia — Clathrus cibarius,
New Zealand, also Chiloe, Chile, also a form (see page 60) Pernambuco, also
a specimen and sketch of a very similar species from Mombasa, East Africa.
Ihere are no color notes, but the sketch is dull yellow — Clathrus crispus, Vera
Cruz, also specimen, poor, so labeled, from Australia, but not the species, I
think — Clathrus crispatus, Yucatan, dried specimen, but seems the same as the
original at Kew from Ceylon — Lysurus Gardneri, co-type, Ceylon — Coins
hirudinosus (alcohol) from Meadow Valley, Asia Minor — Aseroe rubra, Aus-
tralia.

CRYPTOGAMIC MUSEUM, PARIS, FRANCE.

Aseroe arachnoidea, type specimens in alcohol from Harmand, Cochin
China — Anthurus trifidus, in alcohol, type from Japan, Dr. Harmand, specimen
is broken, but I think is a Pseudocolus — Aseroe rubra, New Zealand, Raoul
— Phallus impudicus, several, France — Phallus Ravenelii. There is an historical
specimen more than two hundred years old in the herbarium of Vaillant. It
was "Boletus phalloides" and was "ex Canada, 1702" — Phallus aurantiacus,
type, India — Mutinus caninus, several, France — Mutinus elegans, type, Ohio,
good condition — Mutinus Ravenelii ex Ravenel — Mutinus curtus, fragment from
Berkeley — Mutinus xylogenus, types ex French Guiana and drawing (good)
from Leprieur — Pseudocolus fusiformis, type drawing from Reunion, all that
is known — Lysurus Gardneri ex Berkeley — Laternea triscapa from Chile, the
specimen is very small, but probably a small columnata — Laternea columnata
ex Ravenel, also Chile — Clathrus gracilis ex Berkeley, also a specimen so
referred from New Caledonia, the latter also published as Colus hirudinosus,
but so poor it should not have been named — Clathrus cancellatus, a number
all from Southern France and one Algeria — Clathrus gracilis, ex Berkeley,
Australia, also a very poor specimen ex Africa, similar to gracilis, but too poor
to judge. It was named Clathrus Fischeri — Clathrus cibarius, type ex New
Zealand, in alcohol, also from Chile! — Lysurus cruciatus, a number of type
specimens, but all much broken, French Guiana — Colus hirudinosus, specimen
from Pyrenees, Algeria, and Corsica, the latter received by Montagne in
1820, thirteen years before it was published, and is labeled "Clathrus hirudinosus
nobis" — Phallus subuculatus, type from Algeria, "very common and less fetid
than impudicus," says the collector — Phallus duplicatus ex Ravenel — Phallus
indusiatus, in alcohol, from French Guiana, also dried, the type of "Sophronia
brasiliensis" from Brazil, also type of "Phallus radiciatus" from French Guiana,
also from Tonkin and New Caledonia — Anthurus Calathiscus, no specimen was
received, but the drawing is there from Perrottet, India, on which I think
Montagne based his imaginary "Calathiscus Sepia."

UPS A LA, SWEDEN.

In alcohol. — There is a very abundant collection made by E. Nyman in
Java a number of years ago.

Phallus indusiatus, twelve collections, ten of the usual form writh broad
pilei and two with slender pilei.

Clautriavia merulina, two collections. This is a frequent species in Java.

Simblum periphragmoides (and the form gracilis), five collections, which
convince me that gracilis is at the best a form of periphragmoides.

Mutinus bambusinus, one collection.

82

Clathrus Treubei, three collections, two old, with the arms broken apart
as shown in Myc. Notes, p. 382, fig. 212.

Jansia rugosa, one collection.

There is also at Upsala, in alcohol, a specimen of Aseroe rubra from New
Zealand, collected by G. von Scheele; Clathrus cancellatus from Montpellier
France, and ten collections of Phallus impudicus by various collectors in Sweden.

Dried specimens.— Aseroe rubra from New Zealand, Berggren, and a draw-
ing from the fresh specimens— Clathrus cancellatus, Tirol, Bresadola— Clathrus
pusillus, New Holland, ex. Berk."— Mutinus elegans from Curtis, and labeled
"Corymtes brevis," which was a manuscript name for it— Clathrus cibarius
New Zealand, Berggren— Lysurus Gardneri, co-types, ex. Berkeley— Macowan-
ites agaricinus, co-type from Kalchbrenner. (Not usually classed in the phal-
loids, but to my mind closely related) — Mutinus caninus, ex. Quelet, France—
Mutinus (unnamed), Guadeloupe, L'Herminier. (Something curious but un-
named, and I think this specimen unnamable)— Phallus impudicus Fautrey,
France— Clathrus guttulatus, no specimen but the type drawing from Orsted on
which the species was based.

BERLIN, GERMANY.

Dried Specimens : Clathrus cancellatus, from a hothouse at Berlin. It
probably does not occur in the open as far north as Berlin. Three collections
from southern Europe— Clathrus gracilis, three from Australia, also so-labeled
from Samoa (!) and it seems correct. — Clathrus Baiimeri, the types, dried
specimens but better unnamed from such material. — Clathrus crispus, Guadeloupe
— Simblum sphaerocephalum, three from Brazil and Uruguay — "Anthurus"
Woodii, co-types and the type drawing. I think it is a Lysurus— Lysurus
borealis var Klitzingii, same exactly I think as our American form— Aseroe
(sp.?) from Africa!— Aseroe pallida, type and drawing from New Caledonia-
Phallus indusiatus, specimens from Samoa, Usambara, New Guinea, Brazil and
Australia — Phallus rubicundus, specimens from South Africa and Australia
(labeled aurantiacus) — "Omphalophallus" calvescens and Muellerianus, both co-
types (Australia) and both, same, but specimens too poor for comment, much
less to be named — Phallus (unnamed) from Brazil, on the order of Ravenelii
but much too large — Mutinus caninus seven collections from Germany — Mutinus
elegans from Ran, Penn. — Mutinus (sp.?) from Dr. Reinecke, Samoa. I found
no Mutinus in Samoa.— Phallus impudicus, many specimens, mostly from Ger-
many—Kalchbrennera corallocephala from MacOwan, South Africa, also a draw-
ing (labeled Aseroe Tuckii and the type of this "new species") — Floccomutinus
Zenkeri, the original drawing from Zenker.

In alcohol : Clautriavia merulina, Java — Simblum periphragmoides, Java —
Phallus indusiatus, nine from Java, two from Africa, three from New Guinea.
One of the African forms has unusually large meshes to the veil — Clathrus
camerunensis, type, Africa — Clathrus Americanus (unnamed) from Paraguay —
Clathrus chrysomycelinus, type Brazil — Laternea columnata, Brazil — "Laternea
pentactina", type, Java. It is an old condition of Clathrus Treubei, the arms
broken apart as shown in figure 212, page 382, Myc Notes — Simblum sphaero-
cephalum, Brazil— Aseroe rubra, New Guinea. I can not say as to the exact
form, but it seems to have a broad limb and to tend towards the East Indian
species. — Lysurus borealis, var. Klitzingii, Berlin, same I think as our American
form — Clautriavia Lauterbachii (type of Echinophallus Lauterbachii) unfortu-
nately only known from eggs as it is a most peculiar genus — Eggs of a Clathrus
determined as Preussii ? but I think the species is ? — Mutinus boninensis, type,
all known, intermediate between Mutinus and Jansia — Jansia elegans, abundant,
from Java, type of "Floccomutinus Nymanianus'' but quite different from the
genus Floccomutinus, I think. — Floccomutinus Zenkeri, type Africa, a very dis-
tinct genus, in my opinion — Mutinus bambusianus, several collections from Java.
Some have rather short heads and in size approach Mutinus caninus of Europe.
The gleba-bearing portions are more pointed and not so even as caninus —
Mutinus caninus, Germany— Blumenavia rhacodes, type, Brazil— Itajahya galeric-
ulata, type Brazil.— Phallus glutinoides, type. Brazil. All are in egg state. —
6 83

Clathrus pseudocancellatus, type. Africa. It was probably originally in formalin
as it is now flabby and shapeless.

Phalloids in alcohol in the show department of the Museum at Berlin :
At Berlin there is the finest collection of phalloids, both as to numbers and
condition, that exists anywhere. It was the work of the late Dr. Hennings,
and the specimens are most beautifully prepared and displayed. The following
is the list : Laternea columnata, Brazil — Clathrus cancellatus, Europe — Coins
hirudinosus, Sardinia — Clathrus gracilis, Australia — Mutinus Moelleri, type,
Brazil (=*for me, bambusinus) — Floccomutinus Zenkeri, type, Africa — Jansia
elegans (type of Floccomutinus Nymaniensis) — Phallus rubicundus, Africa (type
of Phallus sanguineus) — Phallus tenuis, Java — Clautriavia Lauterbachii (type
of Echinophallus) — Itajahya galericulata, type, Brazil — Phallus impudicus, two
from Java, one Africa, also a slender form from Java (type of echinata) —
Clautriavia merulina, two, Java — Lysurus borealis (var. Klitzingii) — Aseroe
rubra, New Caledonia, also New Guinea — Blumenavia usambariensis, type, Africa
— Clathrus Preussii, type, Africa — Simblum sphaerocephalum, Argentina — Simb-
lum periphragmoides, Java — Mutinus caninus, Berlin — Mutinus Fleischeri, type,
Java — Mutinus bambusinus, two, Java — Phallus celebicus, lype, Celebes — Phallus
impudicus, three, Berlin — Kalchbrennera corallocephala, South Africa (labeled
Kalchbrenneri Tuckii var. clathroides, Henn.) — Clathrus camerunensis, type,
Africa — Blumenavia rhacodes, type, Brazil.

THE LLOYD MUSEUM, CINCINNATI, OHIO.

Note. — As this list is made in England from the published records without
having access to the specimens, some may have been overlooked. All listed
are dried specimens unless otherwise noted.

Europe.

Clathrus cancellatus, Portugal, Rev. Torrend.

Clathrus cancellatus, Italy, M. Bezzi.

Clathrus cancellatus, France, L. Holland.

Clathrus cancellatus, Spain, T. de Aranzadi.

Clathrus cancellatus, France, Auguste Bernin (fresh!) (alcohol).

Mutinus caninus, Ireland, Greenwood Pirn.

Mutinus caninus, Germany, C. Engelke.

Mutinus caninus, Germany. Otto Jaap.

Mutinus caninus, France, C. G. Lloyd.

Mutinus caninus, Germany, W. Krieger, photograph.

Phallus imperialis, Italy, M. Bezzi.

Phallus impudicus, France, C. G. Lloyd.

Phallus impudicus, France, L. Rolland.

Phallus impudicus, Italy, M. Bezzi.

Lysurus borealis (red arms), England, Harold Murray, photograph.

Colus hirudinosus, Portugal, Rev. Torrend (alcohol).

United States.

Laternea columnata, Florida, L. N. Fowler (alcohol).

Laternea columnata, Florida, Dr. J. F. Maddox (alcohol).

Laternea columnata, Florida, C. E. Pleas.

Laternea columnata, Florida, C. G. Lloyd (alcohol).

Laternea columnata, Florida, C. E. Pleas (photograph).

Mutinus caninus, Canada, Jas. Fletcher.

Mutinus caninus, Maryland, W. T. Lakin.

Mutinus caninus, New Jersey, E. B. Sterling (alcohol).

Mutinus elegans, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky, C. G. Lloyd (alcohol).

Mutinus elegans, Pennsylvania, Dr. Herbst (alcohol).

Mutinus elegans, Ohio, M. E. Hard (photograph).

Mutinus elegans, Connecticut, C. C. Hanmer (eggs).

Mutinus Ravenelii (?), New Jersey, E. B. Sterling.

Mutinus Ravenelii, Ohio, Chas. Dury (alcohol).

84

Mutinus Ravenelii (?), Florida, G. C. Fisher.

Mutinus Ravenelii, Ohio, A. P. Morgan.

Lysurus borealis, Ohio, H. C. Beardslee.

Lysurus borealis, Massachusetts, Geo. B. Fessenden.

Lysurus borealis, Connecticut, C. C. Hanmer (photograph).

Lysurus borealis, Massachusetts, Miss L. C. Allen.

Lysurus borealis (? red), Texas, W. H. Long, Jr.

Lysurus borealis, Massachusetts, G. E. Stone (alcohol).

Phallogaster saccatus, Ohio, C. G. Lloyd (alcohol).

Phallogaster saccatus, West Virginia, C. G. Lloyd.

Phallus duplicatus, Ohio, H. C. Beardslee (alcohol).

Phallus duplicatus, California, L. A. Greata.

Phallus duplicatus, Iowa, L. R. Waldron.

Phallus duplicatus, Ohio, C. G. Lloyd (alcohol).

Phallus duplicatus, Florida, G. C. Fisher.

Phallus duplicatus, Ohio, A. P. Morgan (alcohol).

Phallus duplicatus, Ohio, Prof. W. H. Aiken (alcohol).

Phallus imperialis, Colorado, E. B. Sterling.

Phallus imperialis, Texas, W. H. Long, Jr.

Phallus imperialis, California, L. G. Yates.

Phallus imperialis, Washington, D. C., F. J. Braendle.

Phallus imperialis, California, L. A. Greata.

Phallus imperialis, California, W. H. Henderson.

Phallus imperialis, Colorado, E. Bethel.

Phallus gracilis, Florida, L. N. Fowler (alcohol).

Phallus Ravenelii, Pennsylvania, Wm. Herbst (alcohol).

Phallus Ravenelii, Iowa, F. J. Fitzpatrick.

Phallus Ravenelii, Ohio, C. G. Lloyd.

Phallus Ravenelii, Ohio, Mrs. Carl Langenbeck (alcohol).

Phallus Ravenelii, Ohio. M. E. Hard (photograph).

Phallus Ravenelii, New Jersey, E. B. Sterling (fresh) (alcohol)

Phallus Ravenelii, Florida, G. C. Fisher.

Phallus rubicundus, Texas, W. H. Long, Jr.

Simblum sphaerocephalum, Nebraska, Rev. J. M. Bates.

Simblum sphaerocephalum, Texas, W. H. Long, Jr.

Simblum Texense, Texas, W. H. Long, Jr.

Brazil.

Itajahya galericulata, Rev. A. Schupp (photograph).
Clathrus chrysomycelinus, Rev. A. Schupp.
Clathrus Americanus, Rev. A. Schupp (dried).
Clathrus Americanus, Rev. A. Schupp (photograph).
Laternea rhacodes, Rev. A. Schupp.
Laternea rhacodes, Rev. A. Schupp (photograph).
Laternea (cfr. columnatus), Rev. J. Rick.
Laternea (unnamed?), Rev. J. Rick
Phallus (labeled rugulosus), Rev. J. Rick.
Simblum sphaerocephalum, Rev. J. Rick.

West Indies.

Clathrus crispus, Jamaica, Miss Barrett.
Clathrus crispus, Jamaica, Wm. Chadwick.
Clathrus (sp.?), Bahamas, L. J. K. Brace (egg).
Clathrus Americanus, L. J. K. Brace (formalin).
Laternea pusilla (?), Jamaica, W. Jekyll.
Phallus indusiatus, Jamaica, H. E. Cox.
Phallus indusiatus, Jamaica, Miss Barrett.
Simblum sphaerocephalum, Bahamas, L. J. K. Brace.

Samoa.

Phallus indusiatus, C. G. Lloyd (photograph and dried).
85

Hawaii.

Phallus rubicundus, D. D. Baldwin.

Phallus rubicundus (form gracilis), N. A. Cobb.

Australia and New Zealand.

Aseroe Hookeri, Miss Jessie Dunn.

Aseroe Muelleriana, A. G. Hamilton.

Anthurus aseroeformis, Prof. McAlpine (photograph and description).

Clathrus cibarius, Robert Brown.

Clathrus cibarius, Miss Jessie Dunn.

Clathrus cibarius, S. Duncan.

Clathrus cibarius, W. H. Laing.

Clathrus cibarius, Rev. J. Wilson.

Clathrus gracilis, Prof. D. McAlpine.

Clathrus gracilis, J. T. Paul.

Clathrus gracilis, F. M. Reader.

Clathrus gracilis, J. H. Spencer (alcohol).

Clathrus gracilis, Margaret Flockton (alcohol).

Clathrus gracilis, Edmund Jarvis.

Clathrus gracilis, J. G. O. Tepper.

Africa.

Kalchbrennera corallocephala, Cape, J. M. Wood.
Clathrus (undetermined), Dr. Labesse (alcohol).
Clathrus (unnamed), Congo, Edouard Luja.
Phallus indusiatus, Congo, Edouard Luja (dried).
Phallus indusiatus, Congo, Edouard Luja (photograph).
Phallus indusiatus, C. B. Ussher.
Unnamed genus, C. B. Ussher.

Mauritius.

Phallus gracilis, Chas. A. O'Connor (alcohol).
Phallus indusiatus, Chas. A. O'Connor (alcohol).
Phallus Mauritianus, Chas. A. O'Connor (alcohol).

India.
Genus unnamed, G. H. Krumbiegel.

Japan.

Phallus indusiatus, Professor Gono (drawing).
Phallus impudicus, Professor Kusano (drawing).
Phallus rugulosus, Professor Kusano (drawing).
Phallus rugulosus, Professor Kusano (alcohol).
Phallus rugulosus, T. Nishida (alcohol).
Phallus tenuis, Professor Kusano (drawing).
Phallus tenuis, Professor Kusano (alcohol).
Mutinus boninensis (?), Professor Kusano (alcohol).
Mutinus boninensis (?), Professor Kusano (alcohol).
Lysurus Mokusin, Professor Gono (drawing).
Lysurus Mokusin, Professor Kusano (drawing).
Laternea bicolumnata, Professor Kusano (photograph).

Java.

Clathrus Treubei, Dr. Ch. Bernard (photograph).
Clathrus Treubei, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).
Phallus indusiatus, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).
Clautriavia merulina, Professor Patouillard (photograph).
Clautriavia merulina, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).

86

Simblum gracile, Dr. Ch. Bernard (photograph).
Simblum gracile, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).
Jansia rugosa, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).
Aseroe arachnoidea, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).
Aseroe arachnoidea, Dr. J. P. Lotsy (alcohol).
Mutinus bambusinus, Dr. Ch. Bernard (alcohol).

APPENDIX V.

SOURCE OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Photographs.

The best illustration of a phalloid is a good photograph, and we confidently
look to photography to dispel much of the doubt that surrounds many of the
species of foreign phalloids. We present herewith a list of those who have
published or supplied photographs of phalloids or furnished material to illustrate
phalloids by photography, and have indicated our figures that are taken from
these sources. America leads the world in the use of photography to illustrate
fungi. Well illustrated books have appeared by Atkinson, Mcllvaine, Hard,
and Marshall, all containing illustrations of phalloids. We have not cited them
in detail, however, as they all coyer the same restricted field of a few species.
We think the following is otherwise a complete list of those who have aided in
the work. We hope this pamphlet will awaken interest in the subject in other
countries and that the next resume of the subject will have a much larger list.
If you find a phalloid that is not illustrated in this work by a good photograph^
we hope you will not fail to secure a good photograph of it, if possible.

Dr. Chas. Bernard, lava.

Aseroe Zeylandica (Fig. 54.)
Clautriavia merulina
Jansia rugosa (Figs. 30 and 31).
Clathrus Treubei (Fig. 72).
Simblum gracile (Fig. 84).

Auguste Bernin, Monaco.

Clathrus cancellatus (Fig. 70).

N. A. Cobb, Hawaii.
Phallus gracilis (Fig. 6).

Robt. E. Fries.

Itajahya galericulata.

C. C. Hanmer, Connecticut.

Lysurus borealis (Fig. 41).

M. E. Hard, Ohio.

Phallus Ravenelii,(Fig. 8).

W. Krieger, Germany.

Mutinus caninus (Fig. 23).

Professor Kusano, Japan.

Laternea bicolumnata (Fig. 64).

W. H. Long, Jr , Texas.

Phallus rubicundus (Fig. 5).
Simblum Texense (Fig. 85).
Simblum sphaerocephalum (Fig. 86).

D. McAlpine, Australia.

Anthurus aseroeformis (Fig. 46).

Alfred Moeller I from Brazil).

Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus Moelleri (Fig. 13).

Clathrus chrysomycelinus (Fig. 80).

Laternea columnata.

Laternea rhacodes.

Phallus glutinolens (Fig. 10).

Pseudocolus Garciae (Fig. 65).

Mutinus bambusinus (Fig. 26).

Itajahya galericulata (Fig. 22).

Harold Murray, England.

Lysurus borealis.

Chas. O'Connor, Mauritius.

Phallus Mauritianus (Fig. 17).

N. Patouillard, Paris,
Clautriavia merulina.

Otto Penzig (from Java .

Aseroe arachnoidea (Figs. 55 and 56).

Phallus indusiatus.

Phallus favosus (Fig. 4).

Clautriavia merulina.

Phallus multicolor (Fig. 14).

Simblum gracile.

Jansia elegans (Figs. 32 and 33).

Jansia rugosa.

Mutinus Fleischeri (Fig. 27).

Pseudocolus Javanicus (Fig. 66).

T. Fetch, Ceylon.
Jansia rugosa.
Phallus indusiatus.
Clautriavia merulina (Fig. 19).
Clathrus crispatus (Fig. 743).
Clathrus delicatus (Fig. 82).
Simblum gracile.
Lysurus Gardneri (Fig. 38).

C. E. Pleas, Florida.

Phallus duplicatus (Fig. 16).
Laternea columnata (Figs. 57 and 58).

Carleton Rea, England.

Lysurus borealis (Fig. 40).

Kev. J. Rick, Brazil.
Laternea rhacodes (Fig. 61).
Simblum sphaerocephalum.

Rev. A. Schupp, Brazil.
Itajahya galericulata (Fig. 21).
Clathrus Americanus (Fig. 71).

Rev. J. Torrend, Portugal.
Colus hirudinosus (Figs. 89 and 90).
Simblum sphaerocephalum.

Photographed by the writer.
Phallus impudicus (France) (Fig. i).
Phallus Ravenelii, Ohio (Fig. 7).
Phallus indusiatus, Samoa (Fig. 12).
Mutinus elegans, West Virginia (Fig.

24).

Mutinus Ravenelii, Ohio (Fig. 25).
Phallogaster saccatus, Ohio (Figs. 93

and 94).

Figures.

Next to a photograph, an accurate drawing _is the best illustration. In
a few instances we have used Penzig's figures in preference to his photo-
graphs. I think all figures are not good, especially the old ones reconstructed
from dried specimens. However, as to many species they are all we have,
and the following are the sources from which they have been reproduced.
There are phalloids unillustrated by even a crude drawing. It is a standing
reproach that authors are found to engage in such work. In a few such
cases we have photographed the type as a makeshift illustration, but the most
of such work we think is better considered as "nomina nuda" and relegated
to "synonymy."

Fig. 2 Drawing by Otto Penzig.

Fig. 3 Drawing by Ed Fischer.

Fig. 9 Drawing by Ed. Fischer.

Fig. ii Drawing by Alfred Moeller.

Fig. 15 Drawing by Rumphius.

Fig. 18 Drawing by M. C. Cooke.

Fig. 20 Drawing by Ed. Fischer.

Fig. 28 Drawing by F. M. Bailey.

Fig. 29 Photographed from the type.

Fig. 34 Drawing by F. M. Bailey.

Fig. 35 Drawing by Ed Fischer.

Fig. 36 Drawing by Ed Fischer.

Fig. 363 Drawing by Zenker.

Fig. 37 Photograph from ale. material.

Fig. 38a Photograph from dried type.

Fig. 39 Photograph from dried type.

Fig. 42 Drawing by Mueller.

Fig. 43 Drawing by Ed Fischer.

Fig. 44 Drawing by Montague.

Fig. 45 Photographed from the type.

Fig. 47 Drawing by Kalchbrenner.

Fig. 48 Drawing by Berkeley.

Fig. 49 Sketch by Perrottet.

Fig. 50 Drawing by La Billardiere.

Fig. 51 Drawing by Berkeley.

Fig. 52 Drawing by Berkeley.

Fig. 53 Drawing by Kalchbrenner.

Fig. 533 Drawing by Le Rat.

Fig. 59 Drawing by Turpin.

Fig. 60 Photograph of the type.

Fig. 62

Drawing

by

Welwitsch.

Fig. 63
Fig. 67

Drawing
Drawing

by

by

Spegazzini.
Kurz.

Fig. 68

Drawing

at

Paris.

Fig. 69

Drawing

by

F. M. Bailey.

Fig. 73

Drawing

by

Berkeley.

Fig. 74

Drawing

by

Ed Fischer.

Fig. 75

Drawing

by

Oersted.

Fig. 76

Drawing

by

Turpin.

Fig. 77

Drawing

by

Dr. McCatly.

Fig. 78

Photograph,

Museum at Kew,

Fig. 79

Photograph

from ale. specimens

Fig. 81

Drawing

by

Ed Fischer.

Fig. 83

Drawing

by

Hooker.

Fig. 87

Drawing

by

Ed Fischer.

Fig. 88

Drawing

by

J. W. Holland.

Fig. 91.

Drawing

by

Kalchbrenner.

Fig. 92.

Drawing-

by

Kalchbrenner.

Fig. 95

Drawing

by

Kalchbrenner.

Fig. 96

Drawing

by

Berkeley.

Fig. 98

Drawing

by

Berkeley.

Fig. 99

Drawing

by

Hennings.

Fig. 100

Drawing

by

Montague.

Fig. 1 02

Drawing

by

Berkeley.

Fig. 103

Drawing

by

Patouillard.

Fig. 104

Drawing

by

Patouillard.

Fig. 105

Drawing-

by

Corda.

Fig. 1 06

Drawing

by

Kalchbrenner.

Fig. 107 Drawing by Spegazzini.

APPENDIX VI.

Reproduction of the original figures of doubtful and little known species
of the genera Phallus and Mutinus. Most of them I think have no value
whatever, but there is no way of getting rid of them.

Fig. 95.

PHALLUS DISCOLOR.

•yj

Tig. 99. Fi«- 102.

PHALLUS CELEBICUS. PHALLUS QUADRICOLOR.

89

*' ' Fig. 106.

PHALLUS CALYP- MUTINUS PA-

TRATUS.

PUASIUS.

V-t

Fig. 98.

PHALLUS CAMPANULATUS.

Fig. 107.

MUTIXUS ARGENTINUS.

90

•

Fig. 105.

MUTINUS CURTUS.

Fig. 100.

PHALLUS CA-
NARIENSIS.

Fig. 103.
MUTINUS MINIMUS.

Fig. 104.

MUTINUS BORNE-
ENSIS.

91

APPENDIX VII.

ASEROE RUBRA LA BILL. VAR. JUNGHUHNII SCHLECHT.
PAR DR. CH. BERNARD.
Avec deux photographies.

II y a peu de temps, j'ai public dans les Annales du Jardin botanique de
Buitenzorg (Vol. XXII, 1908. 2eme partie, pp. 224-238), une petite note sur
cette Phalloidee tres curieuse, assez rare, et jusqu'alors assez mal connue. Je
deplorais a cette occasion de n'avoir pas pu faire une photographic convenable
de ce type, et je signalais certains points dont 1'etude demandait a etre reprise
ulterieurement. Depuis lors, j'obtins, toujours grace a 1'extreme amabilite
de M. le Dr. /. Bosscha, plusieurs magnifiques exemplaires de cet organisme,
et entre autres les deux individus dont M. Huysmans a bien voulu faire les
deux photographies qui accompagnent cette note. Tous ces echantillons
provenaient de la plantation de Taloen, sur le plateau de Pengalengan, au
Sud de Bandoeng, c'est a dire de la meme station ou avaient etc recoltes les

exemplaires decrits dans ma precedente note. Ces nouveaux individus n'ont
permis de faire certaines observations venant jeter quelque lumiere sur des
details laisses jusqu' a present dans 1'ombre, et je ne crois pas inutile de publier
ici ces quelques lignes qu' illustreront les deux photographies en question,
et qui viendront fixer ou rectifier certains points d' importance secondaire,
car je dois dire des le debut que, dans leurs caracteres importants, ces individus
comcidaient tres exactement avec ceux deja observes.

Je disais entre autres : "Aseroe rubra est une espece extremement poly-
^morphe; . . . il est impossible de trouver dans la serie de ses formes de
"passage une solution de continuite permettant de separer des especes . . .

92

"et la forme qui nous occupe ici vient diminuer encore la valeur des vari6tes
"nettement delimitees ... II importe done de ne separer les types qu' avec
la plus grande prudence, car il est probable que pendant bien longtemps
chaque fois qu on decouyrira un exemplaire de ces champignons eminemment
variables, ce nouyel mdividu constituera un anneau de cette longue chaine de
"types voisins, attenuant les differences et supprimant telle ou telle variete.'

Les echantillons dont il sera question dans la presente note apporteront

i argument de plus en faveur de cette opinion, et si, par certains de leurs

racteres, ils se rapprochent des individus que j'ai decrits anterieurement, la

disposition de leurs bras, qui est fort typique, etablit un passage vers d'autres

formes. Je me contenterai de donner une description de ces exemplaires, les

points sur lesquels je veux fixer 1'attention resortiront d'eux memes dc la

description et de 1'examen des photographies.

Les deux echantillons que j'ai pu faire photographier n'etaient pas de
dimensions particulierement considerables, et ie nombre des bras etait de 18
chez 1'un et de 22 chez 1'autre, ce qui correspond aux indications que j'ai
donnees anterieurement. De meme 1'extremite plus ou moins regulierement
enroulee des bras est caracteristique. La disposition de la volve, du pied assez
court, de la glebe, les couleurs, 1'odeur, etc., ne distinguaient en rien ces formes
de celles deja decrites. Pour tous ces details je renvoie done a ma precedente

93

publication. Mais le point important et sur lequel je tiens a insister est le
suivant : tandis que les exemplaires que j'ai observes jusqu' ici etablissaient
un passage entre les var, seylanica et Junghuhnii de Aseroe rubra, — certains de
leurs caracteres, comme je 1'ai demontre p. 235, rappelant ceux de 1'une ou de
1'autre de ces deux varietes, — les types dont nous nous occupons aujourd'hui et
surtout 1'un d'entre eux sont beaucoup plus voisins de la variete Junghuhnii; et
meme par la plupart de leurs details, ils coincident presque exactement avec cette
variete comme nous la trouvons decrite d'ordinaire; cependant en comparant
tous mes echantillons, j'ai pu me convaincre qu'il n'y a nulle raison de separer
les unes des autres ces differentes formes qui toutes du reste proviennent d'une
seule et unique localite; elles appartiennent non seulement a la meme espece,
mais aussi a la meme variete, cela ne fait aucun doute et il me semble que la
question que se posait E. Fischer dans le "Sylloge Fungorum," Vol. VII, p. 25,
quand il se demandait a propos de A. Junghuhnii: "An ab A. seylanica diversa?"
doit etre certainement resolue par le negative. Non seulement il ne saurait
s'agir de deux especes differentes, mais encore il me parait sue les deux types
doivent etre ranges sous un meme nom de variete.

Le caractere important auquel je fais allusion est la disposition des bras;
je disais a ce propos : "Les bras etant separes les uns des autres et le disque,
'dans certains echantillons etant tres peu developpe, cela parle en fayeur d'une
'identite avec A. seylanica. Cependant il faut remarquer que le disque peut
'etre remarquablement developpe (caractere de A. Junghuhnii} puis que, si
'les bras sont le plus sou vent nettement separes les uns des autres jusqu' a leur
'base, il existe cependant des cas, assez rares, ou Ton pourrait croire a de vagues
"indications de rapprochements par paires." Dans les formes qui nous occupent,
il ne s'agit plus de vagues indications. Un des deux individus photographies
n'est pas encore tres convaincant a cet egard, il est cependant facile de recon-
naitre que ses 18 bras sont rapproches par paires les uns des autres. Mais
1'autre individu est des plus typiques, et ses 22 bras sont tres nettement et tres
regulierement rapproches deux par deux les uns des autres. Dans les deux
echantillons le disque est assez fortement developpe.

Pour terminer je crois qu' il m'est permis de maintenir, en la renforgant,
la conclusion que j'enongais a la fin de mon precedent travail, mais que je
n'osais encore affirmer, a savoir que les varietes zcylanica et Junghuhnii d'
Aseroe rubra devront etre reunies dans la suite sous un meme nom.

Cette petite note n'a pas d' autre prevention que de presenter deux individus
de cet interessant champignon qui, s'il a ete souvent decrit, et plusieurs fois
dessine, n'avait pas encore, que je sache, ete photographic jusqu' ici.

Les deux photographies reproduisent le champignon a peu pres en grandeur
naturelle.

EDITOR'S NOTE.

We publish the above article by Dr. Chas. Bernard, and we take no edi-
torial liberties with it, but publish it just as received. We are particularly glad
to get the photograph, which is the first published of this species of the East
Indies. As we have stated in detail on page 44 our views as to the species of
Aseroe, we shall not discuss the matter here. We believe, however, that the
Ceylonese plant, Aseroe Zeylandica, and the Javanese plant, Aseroe Junghuhnii,
are one and the same but quite distinct from the New Zealand and Australian
forms which go to make up Aseroe rubra. — C. G. L.

94

THE LLOYD LIBRARY, CINCINNATI, O.

Devoted exclusively to a library of Botany and Pharmacy.
contains at the present time about twenty- five thousand
volumes on the above named subjects.

It

95

INDEX.

In making up the pages it was not practicable to keep the figures in serial
order nor always in close relationship to the corresponding text. In this index
we have given the page on which will be found the text and also the figure for
each species.

Antlumis

Text
on
Page
. . 40

•• 43
. . 42
• • 43
• • 43
• • 43
.. 48
.. 46

Figure
on
Page

42
41
41
42

45
45

46

43
43
44
47

55
55
55
62
61
57
58

If

if

59
56
56

26

25

68
34

33
32
32
32

69
9

^9
8
9

0

8

36
36
38
39

37
37

Lysi
Mut

Pha
Pha

Pse

Sim

rus canctae Catherinae.
(unnamed)
Woodii

Text

0 1

Page

. . 40
. . 40
. . 40
. . 27

'• 11

Figur
on

li-
st

29
91
29
91
29
31
91

90
3i

30
30

7t

90
91
89
13
16
89
17

13
15
'3

16
23
19

21
89

23

12
23

52

54
52
53
53

66
65
64
64
65
65

" aseroeformis ....

Muellerianus
Aseroe

argentinus

" arachnoidca
Hookeri

borneensis
caninus
curtus
elegans
Fleischeri
minimus
papuasius

:: s

2

. . 8
. . .8

2

" lysuroides

.. 48
46

" pallida

:: 46
. . 46

" pentactina

" Zcylandica

• • 47
- • 54

' proximus
Ravenelii

• • S2
28

' (African form) . .
Americanus
camerunensis
' cancellatus
Chrysomycelinus . .
' cibarius
crispatus

.. 60
. . 62
.. 56
•• 57
• • 54
.. 63
. . 60

" f«

' xylogenus

- - 30

" saccatus
lua

• • 7

callichrous
calyptratus
campanulatus
canariensis
celebicus
costatus

. . 2
. . 2
. . 2
. . 2
. . 2
. . I

delicatus
gracilis
Kiittulatus

.. 63
. . 62
.. 58
.. 63
.. 60

discolor
duplicafus
Farlowii

. . 2
. . 2
. . 2

'.'. 18

. . 10

. . 18

. . 22

' psetidocancellatus .

' pusillus
Treubei
Clautriavia
Lauterbachii ....
" inerulina
Coins

• • 57
.. 56
. . 24
.. 24
. . 24
67

gracilis
glutinolens
imperialis
impudicus
indusiatus
Mauritianus
Moelleri

" hirudinosus

.. 67

" Zenkeri

• • 35
26

multicolor

. . 20

galericulata
1-msi'i

• • 27

Ravenelii

. . 14

" annulata

• • 34

Rochesterensis
roseus
rubicundus

. . 20
. . 20

'• |*

•• 33
•• 33
.. 68
. 68

48

" rugosa

subuculatus
subtilis

. . 22

.. 18

" corallocephala

" angolensis
bicolumnata ......

" pusilla

.. 50
• • 5i
.. 48
.. 50

adocolus
fusiformis
Garciae

't't Rotliae"?. '.'.'.'.'.'.

•• 51

•• 53
.. 52
•• 52
• • 53

" Spegazzini

•• Si

48

blum

. . 64
67

Lysurus

:;jf

" gracile
" Miilleri

.. 66
67

borcalis

.. 38

" periphragmoides .
" sphaerocephalum .
Texense

.. 66
.. 67
. . 67

' cruciatus

. . 40
.. 36

' Mokusin

.. 36

96

SYNOPSIS

GENUS HEXAGONA

By

C. G. LLOYD

CINCINNATI, OHIO, - - JUNE, 1910

UNIV: R ITT OF CALIFORNIA

A 'I f/i". A' 'Hi v. '

JAN 2 01942

. I i r-» r— » /v r~^ v/

P. HARIOT.

To Monsieur P. Hariot, Curator of the Cryptogamic Museum at Paris, France,

I beg to dedicate this pamphlet, in recognition of the many courtesies

extended to me while working in the Museum. — C. G. LLOYD.

THE GENUS HEXAGONA.

Definition. — The genus Hexagona can be described in a few words
as being fungi with large, round or hexagonal pores, or Polyporus
with large, round or hexagonal pores. It is a tropical or sub-tropical
genus, and does not occur in temperate regions. Theoretically the
genus is purely artificial, based on a single character, but it is a very
convenient genus, and to attempt to break it up would only make a
needless complication.1

In context Hexagonas are usually corky-woody, and as Fries knew
only such species, he specified this as a character of the genus. There
are a few species with hexagonal pores of which the context is rather
fleshy-cartilaginous. We should include them also in Hexagona, be-
lieving it to be better to take the genus literally on its pore character.

Size of the pores. — While the basic idea of the genus is large,
round or hexagonal pores, the word large is, of course, only relative.
There has been associated (unintentionally perhaps) with the genus
Hexagona the idea of regularity of pores. Thus there is a series of
forms related to Hexagona tenuis which have by common consent
always been classed in Hexagona. The pores are rather small, but
they are regular and shallow. Many other polyporoids with larger
pores are classed with Polyporus or Trametes when the pores are
deep.

There is also a group of species, such as Polystictus pinsitus, with
equally as large and as shallow pores, but they are irregular, with
thin, angular, uneven pore-walls. This section is generally included
in Polystictns, and I think that is preferable, but sometimes species
of this section have been called Hexagona.

Spores. — The color of the spores was not taken into account by
the old authors in the genus Hexagona, but as they are practically
all supposed to have white spores, we should make that a character
also of the genus. We have never seen a single spore of any species
of what we include in Hexagona, as spores of white-spored poly-
poroids are rarely found in herbarium specimens. But the fact that
we do not find the spores is a strong evidence that they are white.2

JAny one who is so disposed, however, can discover as many and as useless "new genera"
in it as have several times been discovered in Polyporus.

= It is well known that species of polyporoids with colored spores have the spores, usually
(if not always) in abundance. I have no doubt that all Hexagonas have white spores, though
I have not positive evidence of the fact in a single instance.

There are but two cases where plants have been classed as Hexagona
which I have found to have colored spores, viz. : Hexagona decipiens,
of Australia, and Hexagona gracilis, of Brazil. I shall exclude them
both, however, from Hexagona and include them in the section of
Polyporus, where they belong, not only on their spore color, but their
general natures, which are closer to other Polyporus than to Hexagona.

Fig. 276 X 6

Fig. 277.

Surface markings. — The next character that we use in grouping
the species is the nature of the surface.

Setosus. — There is a very marked section of Hexagona with dense, coarse,
rigid, black hairs or setae on the surface. This is the same character that is
so familiar in the common Trametes hydnoides of the tropics. In fact, there
is a series of species beginning with Trametes hydnoides with minute pores
and ending with Hexagona apiaria with the large pores. This series has the
same form, context, color, peculiar surface hairs, and differs chiefly in the size
of the pores. It is a very natural group and might well be discovered to be a
new genus. The hairs (Fig. 276 X6) are peculiar, being more or less wedge-

shaped and incised. They are detersive and fall away from old specimens.8
Our figure (277) shows the same species (of Australia) in three different con-
ditions. But there are species that we include in this section in which these
hairs are not so strongly developed. Hexagona Deschampsii (Fig. 282) has
the hairs or fibrils strongly agglutinate with only a few free fibrils. It resembles
old, worn conditions of the previous species. And finally we include in this
section species strongly marked with entirely agglutinate fibrils as Hexagona
elegans (Fig. 284).

Velutinus. — This section includes species with fine, soft, velutinate hairs
(Fig. 289). It embraces but a few species.

Glaber. — Surface smooth, but often zoned or uneven, but not hirsute,
velutinate or with strongly agglutinate fibrils.

General shape. — There are of course intermediate specimens, but
most species can be arranged in one of three sections according to
their general shape. All Hexagonas are sessile without stems,4 or
(as in albida) sometimes a rudimentary-lateral stem.

Ungulaformis. — This section, which comprises but a very few species, has
the pileus thick with deep pores. It is usually hard and sub-woody and cor-
responds to the genus Fomes, though the pores are never stratified.

Applanatus. — The texture is softer and general shape is flatter than in the
previous section. The shape corresponds to the usual shape of Fomes ap-
planatus. Usually it is a centimeter or more thick. We include in this section
also some species such as Kurzii that are thinner and tend toward the next
section but have deeper pores, 5 mm. or more.

Tenuis. — The character of the section tenuis is the very thin pileus, rarely
over two or three mm. thick, and the small (for Hexagona) shallow, regular
pores.

The setae in the pores. — There are some species of Hexagona that
have conspicuous, colored setae in the pores. Sometimes these setae
are large enough to be seen with the naked eye, and can easily be

noted on the accom-
panying figure (278),
which is enlarged six
diameters. These
setae are always in
connection with fer-
ruginous or cinnamon
context. They are
much larger than the
microscopic setae
found on many poly-
poroids. (Cfr. Pol.
Issue, page 2), and
often called cystidia.
Klotzsch noticed
F.o.278 xe. these setae and pro-

posed a new tribe,
Scenidium, but the idea never found favor. The inner surface of the

3 Mr. Murrill states that the plants are "nearly glabrous when young" and are finally
clothed with these hairs. I think his explanation should be taken backwards.

* This statement excludes Hexagona gracilis, which, however, is not a Hexagona for me.

pores of Hexagona leprosa appears finely pubescent, but under the
lens the hairs are sub-hyaline and are of quite different nature from
the colored setae of other species.

Color of context. — Most species have a colored context. It is
hard for me to designate the exact color, though it is customary to
describe it as cinnamon, ferruginous, gilvous, etc. In this pamphlet
I designate these as having "colored context." A fewer number have
a context color white or pale ochraceous, much paler than the former.
We indicate these as "pale context." The difference between these
two context colors is so marked that the character can be used to
advantage in classification, and we base on it one of our groups.

The glaucescence of pores. — Many collections of Hexagona have
pores strongly silvery glaucous, and it is a puzzling question how much
stress to place on it in classification. In itself, I think it is not of much
value, for many collections show some specimens glaucous and others
not or only partially so. It seems to me to be a sort of deposit on
the pores, with age perhaps. At Kew there is a specimen of Hexagona
apiaria where most of the pores are strongly glaucous and the outer
(younger) ones not at all. It is one of the species that has setae
on the pores. The setae are quite noticeable on the non-glaucous pores,
but in the glaucous ones they are not visible and have been covered
up (apparently) with this deposit.

History of the genus. — In the very old days all fungi that had pores were
called Boletus, and under this name are included in Linnaeus' Species Plantarum.
Palisot-de-Beauvois, who was a collector of African plants, included a few fungi
in his plates, and the Polypores he divided into two genera, those with large,
round, hexagonal, or elongated pores, that he called Favolus, and those with
small, round pores that he called Microporus. Fries divided Palisot's first genus
into two, those with hexagonal pores which he called Hexagona, and those
with elongated pores that he called Favolus. He took the name Hexagona
from a probably inaccurate illustration of Pollini, which however showed hex-
agonal pores, and the genus was based on this one character. It has been taken
in this sense by mycologists for about eighty years and about a hundred alleged
new species have been named in accordance. The early mycologists, Persoon,
Klotzsch, and Berkeley, were at first not disposed to consider a "large pored"
genus of much value, but after the appearance of Fries' Epicrisis (1838), where
he collated all the known species, no one has presumed to deny the genus/"
The first species to reach Europe was undoubtedly sent to Linnaeus, who named
it Boletus favus. It was from China, but is not in the Linnaean herbarium,
but was stated by Klotzsch, Berkeley, and Hariot to be the same as Hexagona
Wightii, which it probably is.6 The next were two species from Africa, beauti-
fully illustrated by Palisot-de-Beauvois, and the specimens (one at least) are

5 Recently a little cheap juggling was attempted to change all Hexagonas to F
all Favolus to Hexagona, thus making new combinations for them all, and a muss
It was based on such a flimsy pretext that it is not worth discussing in detail.
Hariot, who first showed how the trick could be turned (Bull. Soc. Myc. de Fr
p. 203), dismissed it with the very sensible remark: "Mais la tradition Friesenn
posee et il serait difficile dans 1'etat actuel de la science d'intervertir les designa
riques de plus d'une centaine d'especes'. Le remede deviendrait pire que le mal e
de s'en tenir aux idees admises."

volus and
n general.
Monsieur
nee, 1891.

ons gene-
force est

8 How this was overlooked in the priority hunt I do not know. 1753 is such a "i
te to arrange alleged synonyms that a good thing like that ought not to be overlookec

now .in the Delessert Herbarium at Geneva.7 Next, Hexagona tenuis, the
most common species of the tropics was named by Hooker from South America.
The specimen is in fair condition in Hooker's herbarium at Kew. Then Per-
soon published Hexagona apiaria and Hexagona vespacea from the island of
Rawak, and both are in good condition at Paris, the latter rather scanty however.
When Fries issued his Epicrisis (1838) twelve species were supposed to be
known and Fries had overlooked one of Palisot's.8 Since the Epicrisis there
has been a steady output of "new species." There are in my index 125 names
of supposed species, but this includes a few that were not called Hexagona
but which in my opinion should have been, and a larger number that were called
Hexagona and should not have been.

The work in this pamphlet.— In my work with the polyporoids I have visited
and studied and photographed the species of Hexagona in the following museums :
Kew London, British Museum London, Leiden, Berlin, Upsala, and Paris,
and the private herbarium of Monsieur Patouillard at Paris. Most of the
historic material is preserved in these museums and of the 125 species named
in my index I have seen the type (or in a few cases the co-type) of all that
exist but eight.

Classification. — For convenience we arrange the species in sections
or groups. We have tried to make these groups as natural as possible
for the benefit of the future ."new genus" discoverers.

First (Setosus). — Typically the surface is clothed with dense, coarse,
branched, rigid hairs, usually detersive and then the surface is fibrillose. We
include also species which are covered with agglutinate fibrils generally with
free ends.

Second (Velutinus). — Surface covered with fine, soft pubescence, or veluti-
nate hairs. Plants that we include here are all thin and as to shape belong
in section 5 (Tenuis). A few species that are pubescent we arrange on general
relations in other groups, viz. : Pobeguini in Applanatus ; macrotrema in Pal-
lidus ; bipindiensis in Pseudofavolus.

Third (Ungulaformis). — Thick, hard, with long pores and generally hoof-
shaped. This section corresponds to the woody (Fomes) section of Trametes
and might be called Hexagona-Fomes. We include here also Hexagona resin-
osus on its general nature, although it has a pale context and might be placed
in the group Pallidus.

Fourth (Applanatus). — General shape applanate or flattened as distinguished
from Ungulaform or hoof-shaped. Plants of this section are of a softer nature
than the previous section. We include here for this reason Hexagona amplexens,
that from its shape alone should be included in the preceding, and for a similar
reason we include in the preceding resinosa which from its shape alone belongs
in this section.

Fifth (Tenuis). — Pileus very thin, rarely two or three mm. thick with small
(for Hexagona) regular, shallow pores. Surface smooth. We include in
Velutinus species with pubescent surface.

Sixth (Pallidus).— Context white or pale ochraceous. (All the preceding
except resinosus have context that is more deeply colored, ferruginous, cinna-
mon, etc.)

Seventh (Pseudofavolus).— All the previous have context suberose or sub-
ligneous. In this section we include the species with fleshy, tough nature.
Usually they have been classified with the genus Favolus from which they differ
essentially in their pore shapes. Patouillard bases on them a genus (Pseudo-
favolus). In our opinion, they should be included in Hexagona.

'I have never s<een these, but Palisot gave such fine illustrations that it is not necessary
to see them. One can be as sure from such illustrations as from the specimen itstlr.

8 Viz: Hexagona glabra. As Saccardo seems to have started his compilation of the poly-
poroids with Fries's1 Epicrisis, this species does not occur and has been lost to all modern books.

Eighth (Resupinatus). — I think no resupinate species occur, but the section
is convenient for a resupinate "species" so claimed.

GROUP i, SETOSUS.

HEX AGON A API ART A (Fig. 279).— Color dark. Surface
densely covered with coarse, branched, dark hairs which are detersive,

Fig 279

Hexagona apiaria. Type at Paris.

and old specimens have the surface coarsely fibrillose. Pores large
(3-4 to cm.) from 5-10 mm. deep, ferruginous, often glaucous with
prominent setae (cfr. page 3, fig. 278 x6.) Context thin, ferruginous.

History. — A frequent plant in the Philippines, India, Ceylon, and Australia,
and as found in the museums usually called Hexagona Wightii. At Berlin
there is a specimen from New Guinea and one from Guadeloupe.0 Linnaeus
named something (none knew what) Boletus favus which came from China,
and was evidently a Hexagona and probably this plant.10 The first specimen

9 This is the only specimen from an American station, but the plant is not included in
N. A. F., which professes to include all West Indian species. Owing to the superficial work
done by the author in the museums of Europe, he probably never saw the specimen.

10 The specimen does not exist in the Linnaean herbarium, though there is in the herba-
rium a specimen of Hexagona tenuis named "Boletus favus, Linn." by Dickson, many years
after Linnaeus died.

known to reach Europe was from Rawak and was named Polyporus" apiarius
by Persoon and a good figure given. The specimen (Fig. 279) "is in good
condition at Pans. Next Klotzsch got a specimen from Wight. India which
he called Polyporus Wightii, and also gave a good figure of it >« He not
the setae (See fig. 278, page 3) in the tubes, which are evident even to the
naked eye, and gave an exaggerated figure of them and based on them a "new
tribe, Scenidium.13 A number of specimens have since reached Europe and
are usually referred to Wightii. At the time he described the plant Klotzsch
published that it was the same as Boletus favus of Linnaeus, and that was also
Berkeley s opinion, and I think was probably true.14

Fig. 280
Hexagona hirta.

HEXAGONA HIRTA (Fig. 280).— Color dark. Surface covered
with a dense coat of rigid, branched, dark hairs. These are often
detersive. Context dark, ferruginous. Pores medium (about 8 to 10
to cm.) about 5 cm. deep. Owing to the depth and relatively small
size of the pores it is often put in Trametes. and it belongs there
about as well as in Hexagona.

History. — It seems to be a common plant in Africa, but only in Africa as
far as I know. It was most beautifully and accurately illustrated by Palisot-de-
Beauyois more than a hundred years ago (1805) and his specimen is at Geneva.
Notwithstanding it frequently reaches Europe, but one single specimen has
ever been referred to Palisof's name. Fries discovered it was a new species

11 Persoon at the time was aware of the genus Hexagona, but declined to consider it a
genus, stating that the size of pores is only a relative character.

12 I think the type does not exist. The only specimen I have seen from India is at the
British Museum, but was not collected by Wight.

13 Under these conditions' it seems to me very careless, to say the least, for Mr. Murrill
to describe the pores of Hexagona Wightii as "glabrous within."

14 Klotzsch does not seem to have been consistent in his views of "Boletus favus, Linn."
He gives this plant as being the same, and then he refers another plant to Hexagona sinensis,
which was only a name-change of "Boletus favus."

and called it Hexagona crinigera. Klotzsch got it from Mauritius and referred it
to Linnaeus' (alleged) species under a Friesian name-change, Hexagcna sinensis.
Berkeley decided it was not the Linnaean species and changed it to Trametes
Klotzschii. (He was only guessing, but probably guessed right.) I think
this name has been most generally used for it. Then Leveille got a specimen
from Madagascar, and found it to be another new species, Trametes crassa.
Then Cooke got the same collection (Perville, Madagascar) and described it
as Trametes adelphica, but he does not seem to have taken himself very seriously,
for he never changed his manuscript name on his specimens and they are found
to-day in his collection as Hexagona strigosa.

Fig. 281

Hexagona capillacea.

HEXAGONA
CAPILLACEA (Fig.
281.) — Color light,
ferruginous or cinna-
mon, covered with a
dense coat of concol-
orous hairs. Pores
large, 3-4 mm. deep,
with thin, flaccid
walls. Bright fer-
ruginous in color, de-
void of setae.

H i s t o r y. — This is
known from a single
specimen (Fig. 281) from Venezuela, South America, now in the herbarium of
Patouillard. From the figure it is evidently close to apiaria, but is lighter
color, has finer hairs and thinner, more flaccid pore-walls.

Fig. 282

Hexagona Deschamj

HEX AGON A DESCHAMPSII (Fig. 282.)— Pileus dark reddish
brown, with adpressed fibrils, a few with free ends. Context thin,
ferruginous. Pores large, 3 to cm., rather shallow (3-4 mm. deep)
bright, ferruginous (never glaucous) and with prominent setae.

This species is quite similar to apiaria but is smaller, thinner, and
never has the dense coat of rigid hairs characteristic of apiaria in its prime.
It is only known from Ceylon. Abundant specimens reached Berkeley and were
by him referred to crinigera of Africa (from which it is quite different). Then
a single specimen, having strayed into Paris, was named Hexagona Deschampsii.

Fig. 283
Hexagona aculeata. Type at Paris.

HEX AGON A ACULEATA (Fig. 283).— Color reddish brown,
with appressed, fibrillose, zonate surface. Pileus thin. Pores medium,
5-6 to cm., regular. Color ferruginous.

This is known only from one collection made in French Guiana by Leprieur.
It is in Montague's herbarium, and there is also a co-type at Upsala. It
about the same sized pores as Hexagona hirta, but is a lighter colored plant, is
thinner, and does not have the same dense coat of hairs.

HEXAGONA ELEGANS (Fig. 284).— Color dark reddish
brown. Surface with appressed, rigid fibrils and zonate.
dittm, 5-6 to cm., 6-8 mm. deep, glaucous.

A single specimen of this is in the museum at Paris and its origin i is not
known. It is not as close to Hexagona aculeata as might appea

9

photograph. It is a thicker plant and the pores are glaucous, also the surface
is not so strongly zoned.

Fig 284

Hexagona elegans. Type at Paris

Fig. 285
Hexagona Dybowski. Type at Paris.

IO

HEXAGONA DYBOWSKI (Fig. 285).— Pileus thin, flexible, of a
pale color. Surface rugulose, zoned with a dense coat of pale, slender
hairs, which are detersive, and old specimens evidently become almost
smooth. Pores medium, pale, with angular walls disposed to become
somewhat irpicoid.

There are three collections of this plant from the Congo, Africa, in the
Museum at Paris, but it has never reached any other museum. It is a unique
species, very different from all others of this section in its pale context color
and the general color of the plant. Its affinities are rather with Trametes or
Polystictus .than with Hexagona.

'

Fig. 286
Hexagona Henschalli. Type at Kew.

HEXAGONA HENSCHALLI (Fig. 286).— Color reddish brown.
Pileus thin, strongly zoned. Most of the zones are smooth or appress
fibrillose, a few with free fibrils. Pores large, rather shallow, glaucous,
with thin walls and disposed to become a little irpicoi<

A single specimen is at Kew from Java, and named Hexagona .Henschalli
by Berkeley. It was never published, but was placed in the apiana cover
from which species it seems to me to be quite d

II

GROUP 2, VELUTINUS.

We include in this group only the thin, velutinate plants that correspond
to the group Tenuis in form and thickness. There are three other pubescent
or velutinate plants (mentioned on page 14) which are included in other groups.
As included here, the entire group might be considered a single species. All
are very similar plants, thin with zonate, velutinate surface, and small, regular,,
shallow pores. It is chiefly an American group and abundant specimens are
in the museums from the West Indies, Mexico, and South America. Of other
than American specimens there are only three collections known, viz. : one each
from New Caledonia, Africa, and Ceylon.

Fig. 287.
Hexagona variegata.

HEX AGON A VARIEGATA (Fig. 287).— Pileus thin, with fer-
ruginous context. Surface velutinate with fine hairs and strongly
marked with variegated, colored zones. Pores small, regular, shallow,
smooth, usually ferruginous color, but sometimes glaucous.

This is a strongly marked species, the upper surface resembling bright
forms of Polystictus versicolor. The contrast of zones usually alternate seal
brown and blood brown. Sometimes plants are more evenly colored and then
it runs into the next "species." It is a common plant in Mexico, Central America,
West Indies, and South America, and many specimens are in the museums.
Most of them are called variegata, and Berkeley so labeled most of his specimens.
There is no question, however, that it is the same plant that Berkeley at a
much earlier date named Hexagona papyracea and as he himself virtually so

stated. The name variegata is a much better name and has been generally
•employed.16

The two following may be called varieties or species, as you may prefer.

HEXAGON A
SCUTIGERA (Fig.
288). — In Balansa's
exsiccatae are found
specimens so labeled
on Spegazzini's au-
thority. It is prac-
tically the same as
the preceding except
the surface is of a uni-
formly brownish color
and is perhaps more-
rug u 1 o s e 1 y xoned.
In any large collec-
tion of Hexagona va-
riegata. however, all
connecting forms oc-
cur, and it is at best
a form. No type ex-
ists, but I judge it is
correctly named, in
which event it is a
case for the date dic-
tionary experts.

Fig. 288

Fig. 289
Hexagona velutina. Type at Paris.

15 Even Mr. Murrill uses it, though in order to excuse his disregard of dates he puts a
question mark after Hexagona papyracea. If any doubtful mark should be used, it should be
after variegata, for the type specimen of Hexagona papyracea is in good condition and un-
questioned, and there is no type of Hexagona variegata so labeled. As a matter of fact I be-
lieve there is a "type" from which variegata was named, but it is labeled Hexagona papyracea.

13

HEXAGONA VELUTINA (Fig. 289).— The only specimen of this section
known from Africa has a uniform brown color with narrow zones. It also
has smaller pores. Otherwise it is the same as variegata. It is known from
a single specimen and was called velutina. Nearly the same plant (one col-
lection) reached Berkeley from Ceylon. He referred it to variegata.

Note. — The following species with pubescent pilei are placed in other
sections : Pobeguini in Applanatus ; macrotrema in Pallidus ; bipindiensis in
Pseudofavolus.

GROUP 3, UNGULAFORMIS.

(Hexagona of the "Fomes" type are few in number, but very marked species.)

Fig. 290,
Hexagona nitida. Type at Paris.

HEXAGONA NITIDA (Fig. 290).— Pileus with a hard, smooth,
sulcate, polished crust. Context ferruginous, hard. Pores medium
(5 to cm.) deep, i*/2 to 2.]/2 cm., reaching the crust.

This is the only Hexagona that occurs in Europe, and it is known only
from two stations in the extreme south. It was first found in 1829 in the
Pyrenees, and in Algeria in 1844. Both were on the live oak (Quercus Ilex)
and came to Montagne, who named the species. He gave a good figure in
Flora of Algeria. Then Dr. Marcucci seems to have collected it abundantly
in Sardinia and his specimens (Exsiccatae No. 69) are in most of the museums
under the name "Hexagona (Favolus) Mori Poll.," Dr. Marcucci having referred
it in error to an old figure of Pollini, to which it has little resemblance. After-
wards Baglietto, noting the mistake, naturally discovered it must be a new

species and called it Hexagona Marcucciana.™ At Paris, where it can be
compared with Montagne s specimen, I doubt if one can be told from ;-hc o»her
if they were transposed. I think Professor Maire has collected it in Greece
but I have seen none of his specimens. Hexagona nitida from what is known
seems to occur only on the live oak (Quercus Ilex) and only in the Mediterranean
countries There are several of Marcucci's collections in" the museums mostly
now badly eaten. The only good specimen I have seen is the Algerian col-
lection in Montagne s herbarium, from which our figure (290) has been made

Fig. 291
Hexagona Gunnii. Co-type at Paris.

HEXAGONA GUNXII (Fig. 291).— Pileus ungulaform, with a
thin, fragile, smooth, reddish brown crust which appears to me slightly
laccate. Context thick, ferruginous.17 Pores large, concolorous, with
thick walls.

This species is represented at Kew by several collections from Tasmania
and Australia. I think it grows on Eucalyptus trees. Berkeley named it in
1839 as Polyporus vesparius, and then changed it (unfortunately without Otto
Kuntze's consent) to Hexagona Gunnii.18

HEXAGONA SULCATA (Fig. 292).— Pileus subligneous, with
a hard crust and deep, sulcate ridges. Context ferruginous. Pores
medium (4-5 to cm.) deep, rigid, pale wood color.

18 This was in "Erbario Crittogamico Italiano," where Marcucci's collection was again

distributed. The advertisement is given in Saccardo as "Bagl. & de Not," but they were

both lichen men. I suspect Cesati was really responsible for it, as he seems to have been
the chief fungus man of these exsiccatae.

11 1 think this is the only species known with a strong development of the context. Usu-
ally the pores almost reach the crust.

18 I do not know why Berkeley changed the specific name when he put it in Hexagona,
but he no doubt had good reasons for it, and he thought he had the right. At any rate it
was before our "lawmakers" had legislated on the subject as to what a man has a right to
do in his own private affairs.

This strongly marked species is only known from Ceylon. Berkeley pub-
lished it in 1847 with a good figure and sent specimens to both Fries and
Montague. That sent to Montagne (Fig. 292) was typically sulcate, but the
specimen to Fries (Fig. 293) was more even. Berkeley did not retain a speci-
men in his own herbarium, and when some twenty years later he received the
smooth form also from Ceylon he described it as Hexagona durissima. It is
the same as the specimen of sulcata he sent Fries. Whether or not it is
the same species as sulcata I do not know, but I think probably only a smooth
form.

Fig. 292
Hexagona sulcat

Fig. 293.

Hexagona durissima.

HEXAGONA DURISSIMA (Fig. 293).— This seems to be practically the
same plant as sulcata except it has a more even crust. It is known only from
Ceylon, but recently I have seen a specimen so referred, and probably cor-
rectly, from Java.

HEXAGONA RESINOSA (Fig. 294).— Pileus applanate, with a
dark resinous crust. Context hard, sub-woody, pale alutaceous or pale
ferruginous. Tubes medium, 5 to cm., i to il/2 cm. deep, pale color,
with rigid walls. Spores (teste Murrill) hyaline, smooth, 4x6.

This species was recently well named by Murrill, from the Philippines,
and is very different from all others. It is known only from one collection
or record.19 Its natural relations I think arc with Fomes pinicola, the same

resinous crust, same context, and the coloration both of context and crust is
similar There is no similar plant in the genus Hexagona, and it might well
be made the type of a new genus We place it in this section on account of
its evident Fomes relationship, though as to form it belongs ir the next and
as to context color it approaches the section Pallidus.

Fig. 294.
Hexagona resinosa. Co-type in museum at Berlin.

Note. — Hexagona laevis was based on nondescript material from Andaman
Islands. There is one poor specimen at Kew and another at the British
Museum. I judge it belongs in this section.

GROUP 4, APPLANATUS.

This is an artificial group to include species that have no one prominent
character to throw them into other groups, and which are flat but .not too thin.

HEXAGONA POBEGUINI (Fig. 295).— Pileus applanate, with
concentric, sulcate zones, and minutely pubescent. I think the pubes-
cence wears off to a certain extent on old specimens. Context sub-
ligneous, harder than others of this group, ferruginous. Pores large
2-3 to cm., ferruginous, with rigid walls and setae.

This seems to be a frequent plant in Africa, and several collections are at
Paris and Berlin. One at the Britisli Museum was named Hexagona Wel-
vvitschii. In fact, the plant was discovered to be a "new species" in each of
2 17

the three museums where it is to be found.20 The zones of the pileus are
sometimes (in the type specimen) colored with different shades of brown. The
pores of the type were crenate, but that was only an accidental character of
this particular specimen. The pores vary in size, as shown in our figures.

Fig 295
Hexagona Pobeguini.

HEXAGONA NIAM-NIAMEXSIS (Fig. 296).— Pileus smooth,
unicolorous, with narrow zones. As to surface it much resembles
Hexagona tenuis. Context ferruginous. Pores medium, about 4 to
cm., regular, with thin hexagonal walls, l/2 cm. deep. They have no
evident setae and some of them (not all) are glaucous.

This is known from a single specimen (Fig. 296) from Africa at Berlin.
The specific name, while alleged to be Latin, is more probably from an
Ethiopian dialect. It is a terrible misfortune for a plant to have to bear such
a name as that.

20 In a case of this kind we are very much disposed to take the best name, as we
lieve plants should be given decent names'. Where a poor plant has had the misfortune
be named Pobeguini, Stuhlmanni, and Welwitschii, there is not much choice.

18

Fig. 296.
Hexagona niam-niaraensis. Type at Berlin.

Fig. 297.

Hexngona chartacea. Type at Paris.
19

HEX AGON A CHART ACE A (Fig. 297).— Pileus rather thin,
smooth, with narrow zones. Pores large, about 3 to cm., 5 mm. deep,
with thin walls. Color ferruginous and setae evident.

This is rather a thin species for this group and is known from two col-
lections from Africa. One of the collections was named Hexaerma obversa,
but seems to be too close to be kept distinct. I can see very little application
of the name chartacea to this plant.

Fig. 298.

Hexagona leprosa. Type at Upsala.

HEX AGON A LEPROSA (Fig. 298).— Pileus with a thin, dull,
slightly pubescent crust, not zoned. Context soft, spongy, ferruginous.
Pores medium, 4-5 to cm., 1^2-2 cm. long, with thin walls. The
inner surface of the pores is pubescent under the lens, with short, pale
hairs. The color of the entire plant is almost uniform.

This is known only from a single specimen, collected in the West Indies,21
about sixty years ago and preserved in a jar at Upsala. There is a small co-type
fragment also at Kew.

21 It has been stated "also in Brazil." ' I know not the source of this statement, but am
sure there is no specimen from Brazil in any museum of Europe that I have visited.

HEXAGONA SPECIOSA (Fig. 299).-Pileus with a thin, zoned,
smooth crust. Context and pores ferruginous. Pores medium large
about 4-5 to cm., i-i/2 cm. deep, with thin walls becoming lacerate.

In size, shape, and color this plant is much like the preceding It is kno
from a single spec.men in a jar at Upsala and a co-type a Kew It c
from South Africa sixty years ago

Fig. 299
Hexagoua speciosa. Type at Upsala.

Fig. 300.
Hexagona Kurzii.

HEXAGONA KURZII
(Fig. 300). — Surface dark red-
dish brown, rugulose, zoned.
Pores medium 5 to cm.. 5 mm.
deep, strongly glaucous.

This came from India and has
a general resemblance to Hexagona
polygramma." The' pores are too
deep, however, to be entered in the
section with polygramma.

HEXAGONA ERUBESCENS (Fig. 301).— Pileus rigid, about
2 cm. thick, with a smooth zoned crust. Pores irregular, angular, about
5 to cm., i-il/2 cm. deep, with rigid, rather thick walls. No setae.

1 The co-type collection is at Kew on a sheet of polygramma.
21

This is based on a collection by Spruce, Brazil, and is at Kew. The
collector states "Hymenium vinosum," hence Berkeley named it erubescens.
The pores have lost all vinous color now. The strong character of the species
for me is its rigidity, both of pileus and pores. The species is found in Sac-
cardo in section "Hirtae." The type has not a sign of a hair of any kind. There
is a collection at Kew, however, that was referred to erubescens, and which
has appressed fibrils, but I think it quite another (and a "new") species. I
should prefer that some one else name it.

Fig 301.
Hexagona erubescens. Type at Kew.

Fig. 302.
Hexagona amplexens.

HEXAGONA AM-
PLEXENS (Fig. 302).—
Pileus small, ungulaform,
gibbose, smooth, with sul-
cate zones. Context brown,
suberose. Pores 5-6 to cm.,
5-8 mm. deep, concolorous,
with thin walls, no setae.

This little species is unique in size and shape. It is known from one col-
lection in the herbarium of Patouillard, and came from New Caledonia. It
evidently grew on small branches which it partially encircled.

SECTION 5, TENUIS.

This group is the most important of all for it embraces the only common
species that grows in many warm countries, viz. : Hexagona tenuis. They are
thin plants, rarely over two or three mm. thick, with smooth, concentric-zoned
pilei. The pores are small and shallow. Sometimes the plants are called
membranaceous, but I think are not thin enough to be called membranes.

Fig 303
Hexagoiia tenuis. (Type form.

HEXAGONA TENUIS (Fig. 303).— Pileus rigid, with a smooth,
concentric-zoned surface. Context thin, about 2 mm., ferruginous.
Pores small, regular, round. 8-12 to cm., shallow.

Fig 304

Rugulose form classed as Hexagoiia tenuis. (Kew.
23

This is a widely distributed plant and occurs in most warm countries of
the world. Like all widely distributed plants it varies, and it is not practicable
to maintain all the specific names that have been given to it. As to pore size
those with the smallest pores were named Hexagona pulchella (Fig. 305),
then the type size (Fig. 306) and the largest size (Fig. 307) were called
Hexagona polygramma. With hardly two collections with exactly the same
sized pores, it is difficult to maintain these "species." And yet the pore sizes
have some value for they are usually uniform in specimens of the same col-
lection. They also vary as to color, and particularly in the development of
a glaucous pore covering. Some collections have no sign of it, others are
partially glaucous, and others strongly glaucous. Hexagona cervino-plumbea
is only a glaucous form.

Fig. 305. Fig. 306

Comparative pore sizes. Fig. 305, pulchella. Fig. 306, tennis (type).

Fig 307
- 3°7- polygramma.

History. — The first specimen recorded was brought by Humboldt from
South America and is still preserved in Hooker's herbarium. It was published
by Hooker as Boletus tenuis in Kunth Synopsis (1822) and in the preceding
paragraph an anomaly of the same species as Boletus reticulatus.23 However,
this was not the first specimen to reach Europe, for it is found in the Linnaean
herbarium with no clue to its source. It is labeled "Boletus favus, Linn.," an
obvious error as pointed out first by Klotzsch, then by Berkeley, and very
recently by Mr. Murrill.24 Hexagona tenuis is a very common species in many

23 As this was published at a "previous date," according to Kuntze's method of reckoning
dates, it was necessary to find another species called reticulatus to put forth as a rea-
son for not taking the name. This was not a Hexagona, but that was a minor matter com-
pared to the importance of Hooker having published reticulatus in a previous paragraph to
tenuis in the same book. It was Klotzsch who first recognized that reticulatus was only an
altered condition of tenuis, and he so indorsed it on the label, from whence was obtained the
information that was dilated upon at length recently, forgetting to mention that it had all
been published in full by both Klotzsch and Berkeley many years ago.

24 "Im Linne'schen Herbarium, Boletus favus' ist Polyporus tenuis, Hooker." — Klotzsch,
1832.

"Hexagona tenuis is marked in the Linnaean herbarium Boletus favus, but not by Lin-
naeus, with whose description it does not correspond. The name is evidently not authorita-
tive." — Berkeley, 1842.

"This species is found in the Linnaean herbarium marked Boletus favus, but not by Lin-
naeus, nor with his sanction." — Murrill, 1905.

Had Mr. Murrill, instead of copying Berkeley, done a little investigating in the Linnaean
herbarium he would have found that "this species" was named by Dickson many years after
Linnaeus died, and under the circumstances he would have had considerable trouble in ob-
taining Linnaeus' "sanction."

24

countries and like all such species has been discovered to be "new" on numerous
occasions." A number of these seem to me to be absolutely the same
and I can see no difference whatever on which to base "new species"'"

'

Forms of Hexagona tenuis or related plants.

HEXAGONA PULCHELLA (Fig. 3o5).-This plant from Java seems
exactly the same as the type form except smaller pores.

Fig. 308.
Hexagona polygramma.

HEXAGONA POLYGRAMMA (Fig. 308).— Originally from Cuba, the
type is practically the same as that of tenuis with pores slightly larger. In
most museums, however, all these similar plants are arranged in two covers,
one "Hexagona tenuis, Hooker," the other "Hexagona polygramma, Mont."
I can not believe that the namers have any distinct idea of a difference, for
in both covers I have found indiscriminately collections varying as follows:

Size of spores. — From very small, as shown in Fig. 305, to size medium, as
shown in Fig. 307.

Surface.— Relatively smooth and evenly zoned, as Fig. 303-, to strongly
rugulose, as shown in Fig. 304.

Color of pileus. — Very pale, almost white to brown, and many deep reddish
brown.

23 Not necessarily all, however, that are raked up and tabulated. Thus "Polyporus bi-
valvis, Pers.," given as a synonym, has little resemblance to it and is not a Hexagona. A
good specimen is in Persoon's herbarium. "Hexagona cingulata, Lev.," and "He

exagona c

color, Fries'," are also said to be synonyms, but that is only a
of either exist, and the compiler knew nothing about them.

28 For further details see list of synonyms, pages 43 to 45.

25

xagona uni-
ague guess, as no specimens

Color of pores. — Pure cinnamon or ferruginous to dark (fuscus), sometimes
bright silvery, glaucous.

At Kew there are ninety-two collections in these two covers and scarcely
any two of them exactly the same. Under these conditions it is only practical
to do as has been done and refer all to one or two species.

The following we should consider as forms of Hexagona tennis, and we
could manufacture as many more if we were so disposed.

Fig. 309.
Hexagona umbriiiella. Small oc

is the type at Upsala

HEXAGONA UMBRINELLA (Fig. 309).— This has a dark reddish
brown, rugulose surface.27 The same thing is also called Hexagona Dregreana.
Hexagona Boneana is also too close.

HEXAGONA CONCINNA is a very thin plant with small, dark pores
and dark reddish pileus.

HEXAGONA DISCOPODA is a plant with the reddish stain only par-
tially developed over the base of the pileus so that the plant is decidedly tivo-
colored. It seems to be a frequent form in Africa and abundant specimens
reached Hennings and were referred by him to Hexagona polygramma. It is
probably the same as tricolor named by Fries from Africa many years ago
(because of its color contrasts), but no specimen is known now.

HEXAGONA SUBTENUIS was named by Berkeley from India, but I
think not published. It has ferruginous colored pores that to me under a lens
appear slightly pubescent.

HEXAGONA PHAEOPHORA is a form with pale pileus and dark pores.

All the preceding are thin plants, very similar to Hexagona tenuis, and
differing principally in color, pore color, and pore size. The four following,
rigida, similis, Muelleri, and nigrocincta, are thicker plants (relatively), but
with the same general characters and small regular pores. They differ among
themselves as do the forms of tenuis. All come from the same geographical
region, Australia, New Caledonia, and the Pacific Islands, and all, I think, are
better considered as forms of one species.

HEXAGONA RIGIDA (Fig. 310).— Pileus about 3 mm. thick,
with smooth or slightly rugulose zoned surface and small regular pores.

27 The "co-type" that Fries sent Berkeley of Hexagona umbrinella is a much thicker
specimen than is to be found in his own herbarium. I think it is not the same species.

The plant is close to Hexagona tenuis as to color and general appearance,
with slightly deeper pores It came from Australia. Hexagona Muellcri also
from Australia, and based on a single specimen, is practically the same with
slightly more rugulose surface. Hexagona nigrocincta is for "me a pale form
of rigida, paler color and smoother than type of rigida. It came from New
Caledonia, and the ordinary form of rigida also occurs there.

Fig. 310.

Hexagona rigida. Type at Kew.

HEXAGONA SIMILIS. — The type specimen is of a very dark color with
agglutinate, fibrillose zoned surface, so that it has relations to the section Setosus.
None of the fibrils are free, however, and I think it is closer to rigida. The
pores are quite small and dark colored. The "type" is the only one in the cover
that has the agglutinate fibrils strongly marked. Others so referred seem to
me much closer to rigida.

HEXAGONA ATROSANGUIXEA (Fig. 311).— Plant growing
on under side of stick, and largely resnpinate with narrow, pileate
margin. Piletis thin, smooth, deep blood broi^n color. Pores small,
rngulose, shallow, many colored similar to ihc pilcus. and also with a
glaucous deposit.

This species is very marked and the only one I have noted where the
pores are strongly colored red-brown. Its habit of growth is also different
from usual, and abundant specimens at Berlin all seem to have the same habits.
Whether it ever takes a truly pileate form I do not know, but I judge not,
as I think all the abundant types at Berlin are of the same nature. It came
from Africa and is only found in the museum at Berlin.

HEXAGONA SACLEUXII (Fig. 312).— Piletis rigid, with a
smooth, pale, strongly concentrically ridged surface. Pores vary in the

27

same collection (as shown in our figures) as to size. The large pores
are about 5 mm. deep and strongly glaucous.

Fig. 311
Hexagona atrosanguinea. Type at Berlin.

Fig. 312
Hexagona Sacleuxii. Type at Pai

This is known from three collections at Paris, all from Africa. The pores
are deeper than others of this group, otherwise it is close to rigida. The
variation of pore sizes in the same collection is unusual, and I am not sure
but that it is due to different ages. The large pores are strongly glaucous, the
small pores not at all.

28

SECTION 6, PALLIDUS.

This section is quite distinct from all that precede in the pale color of its
context. One species (albida) when fresh is pure white hut discolors some in
drying. The usual color of the museum specimens of this section may be
called pale ochraceous or isabelline. I doubt if there are any in this section
that are true Hexagonas. Probably all have the character of the variation of
the hymenium strongly developed. In Hexagona albida (cfr. Figs. 313 and 314)
and particularly in Hexagona ochroleuca the hymenium takes hexagonal, daeda-
loid, and lensitoid forms and this tendency to variation is as much a specific
character as any character'a species can have.

Fig 313

Fig 314
Hexagona albida. Photographed in Samoa.

HEXAGONA ALBIDA (Figs. 313 and 314).— Pileus pure white
with soft, smooth, faintly zonate surface. Context soft, almost
when fresh, in drying it becomes discolored in lime and more t
Pores large, irregular, about 5 mm. deep with thin walls,
lenzitoid forms ( Fig. 313) are found growing with the hexagonal f
and our figures (313 and 314) are specimens that grew f
same mycelium.

29

History. — This plant was described under this name hy Berkeley from
the Philippines, and seems to occur mostly in Australia and the Pacific Islands.
I found it in Samoa, but it is not common there. In Samoa it usually took
the hexagonal form, rarely the lenzitoid form, but in other localitites it may
run more often to lenzitoid forms. It is the same plant, I believe, as Daedalea
inconcinna, also from the Philippines, and Daedalea intermedia from Australia.
I think Hexagona Cesatii from Borneo is exactly the same thing, with a tendency
to become a little cyclomycoid. When the history of these polymorphic plants
is worked out it will probably be found to have names in other genera such
as Lenzites.

Fio. 315
Hexagona macrotrema. Type at Leideti.

HEXAGONA MACROTREMA (Fig. 315).— The description of Hexagona
albida covers this species also, for it is the same thing excepting that the sur-
face is distinctly pubescent. However, they arc undoubtedly forms of the same
species and they occur over the same region (Pacific Islands).

Hexagona macrotrema was first collected by Junghuhn in Java and so
named by him on the label. The specimen is to-day found in Leiden in good
condition and bears only Junghuhn's original label. Before he published it,
however, Leveille visited the museum, saw the specimen, changed its name,
and published it as Hexagona Molkenboeri. This did not please Junghuhn
(naturally) and he wrote to Fries, who, when he published it used Junghuhn' S
name.28 The name Molkenboeri is therefore "prior" from an Otto Kuntze
point of view, and while I have great regard for priority it does not appeal
to me when served with so much rascality. Therefore I use the name macro-
trema.

Hexagona macrotrema is rather rare in the museums and has been mostly
named albida. I have seen only the following three specimens: Java (Leiden),

28 The plant is found in Saccardo, vol. 6, p. 369, under both names, pretending to be
two different species, although both names were based on exactly the same specimen.

30

New guinea (Berlin), Tropical Africa (Kew). As in the case of Hexagona

albida, it is probable that it takes other hymenial forms.

HEXAGOXA OCHROLEUCA ( Figs. 316 to 319 ).-\Ve shall not
enter here into any detailed account of Hexagona ochroleuca, for it is
usually not a Hexagona. In fact the name glabra is the only specific
name that was given to it as a Hexagona, although it has a dozen
other names, as Trametes, Daedalea, Lenzites, Sistrotrema, etc. Gen-
erally it is a Lenzites, and if we ever consider it in detail it will be
as a Lenzites, its usual form.

Hexagona ochroleuca is the most polymorphic species known, I think, and
takes hexagonal, lenzitoid, irpicoid, and daedaloid forms, often in the same
specimen. Our figure (318) shows three distinct hymenial forms. The hex-
agonal forms are rare and the type of glabra (Fig". 317) is the only one so
named as a Hexagona, though several "species" of Trametes are based on
the same thing. I have seen many lenzitoid forms. Leveille named this speci-
men Hexagona glabra, and another specimen of the same collection (Roux,
India) he called in the same paper Sistrotrema ochroleucum. These plants
are in the same coyer at Paris, and they are surely the same species notwith-
standing the hymenium is so different.

Hexagona ochroleuca has but few constant characters, none of a hymenial
nature, and can only be learned by experience. Its consistency, color of context
( alutaceous, not white when fresh), surface, and distant plates are the main
characters by which it can be known from its equally abundant and equally
polymorphic neighbor. Lenzites repanda. Hexagona ochroleuca, in its various
forms as Trametes, Lenzites, etc., is a very abundant plant in India, Java,
Philippines, and the East in general, and also in Australia.

We have not thoroughly investigated its synonymy, though we believe the
following should be included: Polystictus lenziteus (Zollinger Col.). Sistro-
trema ochroleucum, Hexagona glabra. Daedalea lurida, Daedalea pruinosa, all
by Leveille, who seems to have discovered it was a "new species" every time
he saw a specimen.

Trametes Beyrichii (as to Berkeley's Philippine determination. Cummings
2202), 20 Trametes colliculosa from Ceylon, Trametes lobata from India, Trametes
laeticolor from Ceylon, Daedalea Hobsoni from India (or Australia?),30 and
numerous recent determinations from the Philippines.31 Daedalea Schomburgkii

28 As to Fries, from Brazil, it is doubtful, as1 Hexagona ochroleuca is not known from
America. No specimen of Trametes Beyrichii exists, and what it was is unknown.

30 Daedalea Hobsoni was published in a paper on Australian fungi and was based on a col-
lection cited, made by Schomburg in Australia. Hobson collected in India, and Berkeley re-
fers to his specimen incidentally as "the original specimen," though never formally published.
Under these conditions our lawmakers ought to specifically tell us' which is the "type locality"
and which the "type specimen," as they put so much stress on those things. In this in-tano.-
I think it makes no vital difference, because both are the same plant. Cooke afterwards ,!i-cn\
ered the "type specimen" of Daedalea Hobsoni. which Berkeley had labeled Daedalea Schom-
burgkii and sent Saccardo (cfr. Vol. 6, p. 376) a description of this interesting "new species,"
though based on exactly the same specimen that Berkeley had described sixteen years before.
As evidence of the value of our literature Saccardo puts it in a different section of the genus
from the one in which he places Daedalea Hobsoni, although both were based on the same
specimen.

31 It appears to me that Mr. Murrill's priority investigations were very superficial as to
these plants (as with most others). He uses the name Hobsoni (1865). and it has a dozen
names "prior" to that. Bresadola habitually calls the plant "Daedalea lenzitea (Lev.), l.r.-s..
which was 1854, and Leveille had four names prior to lenzitea, to say nothing of Beifcetar -
discoveries. In the whole list it does not have a suitable name, or I should use it with(
regard to the date. Leveille's name ochroleuca is probably the best. I presume, however,
some enterprising individual could take the synonyms I have cited, look up their dates, ar-
range them chronologically, and produce weighty evidence why ochroleuca can r

31

Fig. 318 Fig 319.

Hexagona ochroleuca. Figs. 316 and 317, type forms {as Hexagonal Fig. 318, a specimen reduced, showi
three variations of the hymeniutn. Fig. 319, an irpicoid form named Sistrotrema ochroleucum.

32

from Australia, Daedalea tenuis from Philippines, Daedalea aulacophylla from
Australia, Daedalea flabellum from Andaman Islands, Daedalea ochracea from
India, Daedalea sub-confragosa from the Philippines, Lenzites Guilfoylei from
Australia, Lenzites ochrophyllus from India.

The old mycologists took the "genera" Trametes, Daedalca, Lenzites, etc.,
literally, and based a new species on almost every specimen of this plant in
every hymenial form that reached them. When the science of mycology gets
beyond its "new species" babyhood, and workers take a broader view of species
than single "type" collections, then I believe all the species I have mentioned
will be held to be the same plant. I call it in this paper Hexagona ochroleuca,
but were I writing on Trametes it would be Trametes ochroleucum. The
same applies to Daedalea, Lenzites, or Irpex. I think its better name is as
Lenzites to correspond with its usual hymenial form, and the equally poly-
morphic Lenzites repanda.

Fig 320.

HEXAGOXA VESPACEA (Fig. 320).— This may-
be-exactly the same plant as macrotrema. It was one
of the early Persoonian names (1826) and came from
the island of Rawak. No other collection has ever been
referred to Persoon's name, and the original collection
is only known from two little specimens, one at Paris
(Fig. 320), another in Persoon's herbarium at Leiden.
These are thinner than specimens of the preceding spe-
cies, and darker, though the dark color may be due to
age. Persoon described them as smooth, but that they
are somewhat pubescent can be seen from our photo-
graph. (Fig. 320.)

HEXAGONA SEURATI (Fig. 321).— Context surface and pores
unicolorous, pale alutaceus or isabelline. Context soft, homogeneous

Fig. 321
Hexagona Seurati. Type at Paris.

with the pores. Surface smooth, no distinct crust. Pores large, shal
low, many superficial.

This species is known only from one collection (Fig. 321) '™t t
of Professor Patouillard. It came from Ra.atea, one of the Society

HEXAGONA AEQUALIS (Fig. 322).-Xo better description of this can
be given than to say that it is a hexagonal, trop.cal form of Daeda ea quercnw.
The color, context, surface, everything, is exactly the same as 1

3 33

Fig. 322.
Hexagona aequalis. Type at Paris.

plant of Europe excepting the hymenial configuration. The pores, as will be
seen from our photograph, are not truly hexagonal, but tend to daedaloid.
Daedalea quercina is presumed not to occur in the tropics. If it does, this plant

must be referred to it. It is
known from but one collection,
mi* ^^^rrm>^. Nuiiii \iiu-rir;i. •'•'-'

" HEXAGONA RHOMBI-

PORA (Fig. 323).— Color pale
alutaceous or isabelline, concolor-
ous. Context thin. Surface
smooth, no distinct crust. Pores
large, flaccid, concolorous, tending
to favoloid.

This is known from a single
half specimen (Fig. 323) in the
herbarium of Montague. It came
from Brazil. No similar speci-
men has ever reached Europe
from South America. I have an
impression that it is an aberrant,

Fig. 323. hexagonal form of some Lenzites

Hexagona rhombipora. perhaps.

32 I think it was a Mr. Smith who some years ago distributed some specimens from Cen-
tral America "determined" by Ellis. Among others was a specimen labeled "Irpex maximus."
It has no resemblance whatever to "Iipex maximus," which is only an irpicoid condition of
the common Polystictus occidentalis of the tropics. Ellis', of course, had no way of knowing
that, and his determinations of tropical species were but little more than a vague guess. The
plant that he called "Irpex maximus" I have always considered as a tropical, irpicoid form of
Daedalea quercina, the same as I consider Hexagona aequalis to be a tropical, hexagonoid form
of the same species.

34

GROUP 6, PSEUDOFAVOLUS.

This section differs from all that precede it in its fleshy, tough nature
rather than corky-woody It is not usually classed in Hexagonal Severa
have been placed in Favolus from which it differs in the basic idea of the genus
Fayolus viz^: the shape of the pores. In my opinion, the species should be
included in Hexagona, or if not, should be made into a separate genus There
the TJnHeT StateT kn°Wn> induding' however- the only Hexagona known from

Fig. 324
Hexagona cucullata, natural size and pores x6.

HEXAGONA CUCULLATA (Fig. 324).— Pileus orbicular, reni-
form, attached by a short disk-like stem. Surface smooth, even, when
fresh Mars yellow, when old deep, reddish brown. Pores concolorous,
orbicular, a scant mm. wide, shallow.

This seems to be a rather rare plant, occurring in Southern United States,
West Indies, and South America. At Kew there are but ten collections, in-
cluding one from Ceylon (but probably the same) named by Cesati, Favolus
chartaceus. In addition it has two other synonyms from the United States.
Favolus curtipes and Favolus Taxodii, and I think a third, the recently described
Pseudofavolus aurictilatus34 from Louisiana.

33 But one of the species, Hexgona Miquelii, is placed in this genus in Saccardo.

34 I have seen no specimen of this, as when I called it was not to be found. I feel so well
convinced, however, that Hexagona cucullata is the only one we have in the United States
that I have very little doubt as to its being the same thing.

35

Related plant.— POLYPORUS ORINOCENSIS (Fig. 325).— With the
same color and other characters except its small pores, we mention Polyporus

Orinocensis here, for we feel it is a
very closely related plant notwithstand-
ing its small pores. Professor Patouil-
lard now places it in the same section
with cucullata. It has small pores and
they are paler than those of cucullata.
When fresh they were probably white.
It would not do to classify such a
small-pored plant as a Hexagona and
we wish Nature would be more con-
F'o- 325- sistent and make her species so they

would fit into the man-made genera. It would be so much simpler. Polyporus
Orinocensis is known from but one collection (Fig. 325) in the herbarium of
Professor Patouillard.

Fig. 326
Hexagona Miquelii. Type at Paris.

HEXAGONA MIQUELII (Fig. 326).— Pileus orbicular, reni-
form. Color deep reddish brown. Surface glabrous, but strongly tes-
sellate. Pores orbicular, shallow, colored.

This, as to coloration, texture, and all characters, is exactly the same as
Hexagona cucullata, except that it is strongly marked with a tessellate pileus.
It is a very rare plant and but three specimens have ever reached Europe, all
of which were discovered to be "new species." First, from Surinam, named
Polyporus Miquelii by Montague, a nice specimen (Fig. 326) in the herbarium
of Montagne. Then from Java, by Zollinger, named Polyporus pustulosus by
Leveille, specimen in the herbarium of Professor Patouillard. The third from
St. Domingo, named by Berkeley Favolus induratus. All are exactly the same
plant.35

HEXAGONA BIPINDIENSIS (Figs. 327 and 328).— Pileus thin,
orbicular or reniform. Color reddish brown. Surface minutely veluti-
nate, strongly tessellate. Pores pale, probably white when fresh, me-
dium round, shallow.

35 In a case of this kind, when Mr. Murrill uses the last name, induratus, his reasons are
very puzzling to understand. As he has' made so much fuss about "priority," we do not know
whether he does not know it is the same plant or whether he thinks 1852 is prior to 1841.

This is represented by an abundant collection at Berlin. It came from
Africa. It was named as Hexagona bipindiensis on the label by Hennings,
but I do not know whether this was published. It is not his Fa volus bipindiensis.
A single specimen of what seems to me practically the sanu- is found in Patouil-
lard's herbarium under the name Favolus velutinus (Fig. 328). It came from
Tonkin and has the same peculiar, \elutinate surface. The pores are a little

Fig. 327

Fig. 328
Hexagona bipindiensis. Fig. 327 '« type at Berlin.

larger and not so regular. I believe it to be, however, the same plant. The
specific name velutina can not be used for a Hexagona as it is already occupiet

HEXAGONA MIRABILIS (Fig. 329).— Pileus white smooth,
thin, with a thin crust. Context none, the pores reaching the c
Pores i to 2 mm. deep, 10-12 to cm., round or hexagonal, whi

4 37

This was a rare plant that I collected in Samoa in but one locality. When
fresh it was pure white and a marked species, being so different from ordinary
polyporoids. At that time I was not acquainted with any species of this group
and was entirely at a loss to know where to place the plant. It is the only
white Hexagona known in this section.

Fig. 329

Hexagona mirabilis. Photographed in Samoa.

SECTION 8, RESUPINATUS.

I believe there are no truly resupinate Hexagonas. The only one that has
any claim is heteropora, and that is probably a resupinate form of something
else. Some resupinate plants that have been named as Hexagonas, such as car-
bonaria and Bartlettii, are evidently so closely related to the ferruginous Porias
that we shall so place them.

Fig. 330.
Hexagona heteropora. Types at Paris.

HEXAGONA HETEROPORA (Fig. 330).— Context pale. The remainder
of the "description" can be made from our photograph. But three collections
have been so named, which came from South America. We present photographs
of all of them. The plant was named heteropora from the varying size of the
pores, and it is evidently (from our figure) well named, if they are all the
same species, which I doubt.

APPENDIX I.
NOMINA CONSERVANDA.

The following is an alphabetical list of the names of Hexagonas that we
would "conserve." It does not have the formal sanction of our professional
law-makers, but we think it has a better claim, namely, use, merit, and truth.

We give in addition to the name the country whence described, and as
we think the name and country are the most important, we place them in heavy-
face type. In lighter face type we summarize other details, viz. : the book cita-
tion, where published, and, what is more important, the museums where the
type specimens are preserved. We also give what is of least importance of all,
except to the parties concerned, the names of the wonderful discoverers.

ACULEATA— South America.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 2, vol. 13, p. 205. Mon-
tagne. Type, Museum at Paris.

AEQUALIS— South America.— Journ. de Bot., vol. 3, p. 258. Patouillard.
Type in his herbarium.

ALBIDA— Philippines. — Jour. Linn. Soc., vol. 16, p. 47. Berkeley. Type
at Kew.

AMPLEXENS— New Caledonia.— Bull. Soc. Myc. de France, vol. 18, p.
299. Patouillard. Type in his herbarium.

APIARIA— East Indies.— Voyage of Uranie, p. 169 (as Polyporus). Per-
soon. Type in museum at Paris.

ATROSANGUINEA.— Africa.— Engler's Jahrb., vol. 23, p. 545- Henniiifjs.
Type at Berlin.

BIPINDIENSIS— Africa.— Not published, as far as I know. Hennings.
Type at Berlin.

CAPILLACEA— South America.— Bull. Soc. Myc. de France, vol. 4, P- 36-
Patouillard. Type in his herbarium.

CHARTACEA— Africa.— Bull. Soc. Myc. de France, vol. 9, P- 209. Patouil-
lard. Type in museum at Paris.

CONCINNA— Africa.— Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 9. P- 209. Patouil-
lard. Type in museum at Paris.

CUCULLATA— Cuba.— Ann. Sci. Xat. 2, vol 17, P- 125 (as Favolus).
Montagne. Type in museum at Paris.

DESCHAMPSII— Ceylon.— Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 7, P- 207. Hariot.
Type in museum at Paris.

DISCOPODA— Africa.— Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 9, P- 209. Patouil-
lard. Type in museum at Paris.

DURISSIMA— Ceylon.— Jour. Linn. Soc., vol. 14, P- 57- Berkeley. Type
at Kew.

DYBOWSKI— Africa.— Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 8, p. 54- Patouillard.
Type in museum at Paris.

ELEGANS.— Unknown, probably from Africa. Bull. Soc Myc. France,
vol. 7, p. 207. Hariot. Type in museum at Paris.

39

ERUBESCENS— Brazil.— Hooker's Jour. 1856, p. 237. Berkeley. Type
at Kew.

GUNNII— Tasmania.— Flora of Tasmania, vol. 2, p. 255. Berkeley. Type
at Kew.

HENSCHALLI— Java.— See page 11; not previously published. Berkeley.
Type at Kew.

HETEROPORA— South America.— Jour, de Bot, vol. 3, p. 166. Patouil-
lard. Type in museum at Paris.

HIRTA— Africa.— Flore d'Oware, p. i, t. i (as Favolus). Palisot-de-
Beauvois. Type at Geneva.

KURZII— India.— Trans. Linn. Soc., 2d ser., vol. i, p. 126. Currey. Type
at Kew, on sheet of polygramma.

LEPRQSA— West Indies.— Nov. Symb., p. 101. Fries. Type in jar in
museum at Upsala.

MACROTREMA— Java.— Nov. Symb., p. 101 (Junghuhn). Fries. Type
in error in Box 42 of Persoon's herbarium at Leiden.

MIQUELII— South America.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 3, vol. 4, p. 357 (as Poly-
porus). Montague. Type in museum at Paris.

MIRABILIS— Samoa.— Described on page 37. Type deposited at Kew.

NIAM-NIAMENSIS— Africa.— Engler's Jahrb., vol. 14, p. 348. Hennings.
Type in museum at Berlin.

NITIDA — Algeria.— Sylloge, p. 170. Montague. Type in museum at Paris.

OCHROLEUCA— India.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 3, vol. 5, p. 145 (as Sistrotrema).
Leveille. Type in museum at Paris. It is only a hexagonal form of a Lenzites.

PHAEOPHORA— China.— Bull. Soc. Myc., vol. 23, p. 74. Patouillard.
Type in his herbarium.

POBEGUINI— Africa.— Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 8, p. 28. Hariot.
Type in museum at Paris. (Did not get in Saccardo's sweep net.)

POLYGRAMMA— Cuba.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 2, vol. 8, p. 365 (as Polyporus).
Montague. Type in museum at Paris.

PULCHELLA— Java.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 3, vol. 2, p. 200. Leveille. Co-type
in herbarium of Patouillard. It is only a small pored form of Hexagona tennis.

RESINOSA— Philippines.— Bull. Torr. Club, vol. 35, p. 398. Murrill.
Co-type in museum at Berlin.

RHOMBIPORA— South America.— Ann. Sci. Nat 4, vol. 5, p. 370. Mon
tagne. Type in museum at Paris.

RIGIDA— Pacific Islands.— Jour. Linn. Soc., vol. 16, p. 54. Berkeley.
Type at Kew.

SACLEUXII— Africa.— Jour, de Bot., vol. 6, p. 19. Hariot. Type in
museum at Paris.

SCUTIGERA— Brazil.— Elenchus Fung., vol. i, p. 73 (as Polyporus).
Fries. No type exists.

SEURATI— Pacific Islands.— Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 22, p. 48.
Patouillard. Type in his herbarium.

SIMILIS— Australia.— Hooker's Jour., 1846, p. 4. Berkeley. Type at Kew.

SPECIOSA— Africa.— Fungi Natalensis, p. 137. Fries. Type in a jar in
museum at Upsala.

40

SUBTENUIS— India.— Xot previously published. Berkeley. Type at Kew.

SULCATA— Ceylon.— Hooker's Jour., 1847, p. 510. Berkeley. There is

no type at Kew, but a co-type in Montague's herbarium, also one in that of Fries.

TENUIS — South America.— Kunth. Synopsis, vol. i, p. 10 (as Boletus).
Hooker. Type at Kew.

UMBRINELLA— Africa.— Fungi Xatalensis. p. 137. Fries. Type in
museum at Upsala.

VARIEGAT A— Central America.— Proc. Amer. Acad.. vol. 4. p. 122.
Berkeley. There is no type so labeled, but there is no question that it is a
specimen labeled Hexagona papyracea at Kew.

VELUTINA— Africa. Bull. Soc. Myc. France, vol. 9, p. 209. Patouillard.
Type in museum at Paris.

VESPACEA— East Indies.— Voyage de Uranic, p. 170. Persoon. Only
known from one little type in museum at Paris, another in Persoon's herbarium
at Leiden.

APPENDIX II.
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION.

The real study of mycology, as I view it, is the study of species and their
variations and the geographical distribution. Very little can be told of the
geographical distribution at present, for much more 'abundant material will have
to reach Europe before anything definite can be determined. We have arranged
in the following tables the species found in the museums under nine geographical
divisions, as follows :

Xo. i, United States and Canada.

No. 2, Mexico, Central America, and West Indies.

Xo. 3, South America.

No. 4, Europe.

Xo. 5, Africa.

No. 6, India, Ceylon, and Malay Peninsula.

No. 7, Japan and. China.

Xo. 8, Philippines and East Indies.

No. 9, Australia, Xew Zealand, Xew Guinea, and Pacific Islands.

The sign t indicates localities from which we have seen one or but a few
specimens; if a number of collections it is indicated by a heavy face C: if the
species is only known from the type collection, we indicate that fact with a
star (*). Species that are very closely related and perhaps better called sub-
species are indicated by being indented under what we consider the "type" form.

c

*•

%

K
G

>

x

>

n

>

q

I

H

§

2

|

>

5g

!

3

o

~

•s

K

>

?!=

a

>

$

3

g

§

c

S

E

>

i

g

P

X

S

•

i

i

3

3

y^

3

Group 1, Setosus.

Apiaria,

t

. . .

C

c

c

T~)pcpVi atn n^i i

c

hirta,

C

. .

. .

capillacea

-

• •

acuieata, . . . . .

s

elegans (probaDlv),
Henschalli

Dybowski,

• •

M

a

^

w

•-I

2

v>

7)

3

2

^

H

o

13

g

z

H

J8

i

•z

O

1

M

i

o

y

0

F

M

1

z

*

H

3

f

3

P

Group 2, Velutinus.

variegata,

c

C

scutigera

c

c

velutina

1 '

t

Group 3, Ungulaformis.

nitida,

t

t

Gunnii,

't'

sulcata, .

«

durissima

t

't'

resinosa,

*

Group 4, Applanatus.
Pobeguini,
niam-nianiensis

c

leprosa

*

speciosa,

* '

chartacea

;•:•

Kurzii

'|'

erubescens

X

am pi exe n s

'#"

Group 5, Tenuis.

tenuis

c

c

C

c

C

C

pulchella,

t

polygramma,

c

c

c

C

umbrinella,

c

discopoda,

c

subtenuis,

#-

phaeophora,
rigida

t

t

similis,

«

atrosanguinea,

*

Sacleuxii,

t

Group 6, Pallidus.

albida,

.

c

macrotrema .

1

-f-

1

vespacea . . .

• •

ochroleuca,

' '

c

c

c

Seurati,

aequalis,

ft

rhombipora,

Group 7, Pseudofavolus.

cucullatus,

t

t

Miquelii,
bipindiensis,
mirabilis ....

t

t '

t'

't'

't'

«

Group 8, Resupinatus.
heteropora,

*

APPENDIX III.
SYNONYMS AND SPECIES IMPERFECTLY KNOWN

The following is the list of specific names which we would refer to synonymy
and our reasons for the same. We give also the countries from whence pro-
posed, and the individuals responsible for them. We hold them responsible
who published them, though in some cases the names were taken from and
credit given to manuscript names. We also indicate a few manuscript names
under which specimens are labeled in our principal museums. While of course
a question in synonymy is largely a question of individual opinion, the following
list (except in such cases as specially stated) is our conclusions as to authentic
specimens examined. We have studied in the British Museum, the Museums of
Kew, Paris, Berlin, and Upsala, which list embraces all the museums of Europe
where much historic material is preserved, except the Java specimens at Leiden.
We visited Leiden twice for this purpose, but both times found the Java speci-
mens had been loaned. We would not pretend to publish as synonyms (as has
recently been done) names that we have merely copied from others, nor would
we perpetrate the fraud of pretending to pass upon specimens we never saw,
and which in many cases do not exist. It is a fact well known to those who
have investigated the subject that the usual description is a mere empty form.
Plants can be recognized from systematic work in which those of a section or
country are described by contrast, but it is impossible to describe a specimen
as an isolated fact so that it can be surely recognized in one case out of a
hundred. If the labels were removed from the type specimens in the museums
I believe that not ten per cent of them could ever be replaced from anything
that has been published about them, and I doubt if one per cent could. Under
these conditions I feel it is useless to carry in our literature names and descrip-
tions of specimens that do not exist. It is a part of the system of "science"
to pretend to be able to judge from these descriptions as to the identity of
the plants described, but I do not think that any one who has had experience
really believes it (except in very exceptional cases), and I decline to subscribe
to any such fiction.

If a plant has not acquired a name by use, or if it was not characteristically
illustrated, and if authentic material does not exist in some museum or where
it can be examined, there is little occasion to further encumber literature with it.

While the following list is specific names of plants placed in Hexagona,
it does not follow they were all so placed by the authors stated. This may
have been done by some one else, and who it was is immaterial and not worth
recording. Nor does it follow that the species are all invalid in other genera
where they belong, but not in my opinion in Hexagona.

Where we state "no type exists," we have been unable to find the type
in the museum where it should be preserved, or authentic material in any other
museum. We have made careful and systematic search, and taken time, and we
believe the statements are literally true. Still we are aware there is always the
possibility of the type turning up in some obscure place. Often we have found
historic specimens in drawers or in cupboards, where the casual visitor would
never think of looking.

The following is the list that we would refer to synonymy, and the reasons.
We state also the name of the country whence described, and the names of
the discoverers of these "new species." It is remarkable how many "discoveries"
are made in "science," chiefly noteworthy from the fact that they are not true.

adelphica, Africa, Cooke=Hexagona hirta.

adnata, Ceylon, Berkeley=an anomaly of some kind.

affinis, Pacific Islands, (Published?) Berkeley^Hexagona tenuis.

arata, Pacific Islands, Berkeley. It is not a Hexagona, but a Polyporus
related to gilvus.

auriculata, United States, Patouillard. Specimen not found for me, but I
have little doubt it is Hexagona cucullata, which is the only species we have
in the United States, I think.

43

Bartlettii, South America (Published?), Massee. Better classed as a fer-
ruginous Poria related to contigua.

Blumei, Java, Leveille. No type known to me.
Boneana, Africa, Patouillard. Too close to umbrinella.

brevis, Ceylon, Berkeley. No type exists.
Burchelli, Mss.=umbrinella.

carbonaria, United States, Berkeley. Better classed as a ferruginous Poria,
close to contigua.

Casuarinae, New Caledonia, Patouillard=Hexagona tenuis.

cervino-plumbea, Java, Junghuhn=Hexagona tenuis.

Cesatii, Borneo, Cesati=Hexagona albida, a little cyclomycoid.

ciliata, Philippines, Klotzsch=Polystictus versatilis.

cingulata, West Indies, Leveille. No type known to me.

crinigera, Africa, Fries=Hexagona hirta.

cladophora, Philippines, Berkeley. Not a Hexagona for me. A better
Trametes.

Cookei, New Guinea, Saccardo. Change of Hexagona favoloides of Cooke,
which being Hexagona albida, the change was not necessary.

coriacea, Brazil, Berkeley. Type inadequate to judge.

crassa, Africa, LeveillerdHexagona hirta.

cruenta, South America, Montagne=:Trametes Persoonii.

cyclophora, African island, Leveille. No type exists.

decipiens, Australia, Berkeley. For me not a Hexagona. It has colored
spores and is a better Polyporus.

dermatodes, Philippines, Leveille. It is a Polystictus-Trametes.

discolor, Australia, Fries. No type exists.

Dregeana, Africa, Leveille=Hexagona umbrinella.

fasciata, Pacific Islands, Berkeley. No type exists.

favoloides, Central America, Peck=Hexagona tenuis.

favoloides, New Guinea, Cooke=Hexagona albida.

favus, China, Linnaeus. No type exists. Supposed to be Hexagona apiaria.

flabelliformis, Philippines, Berkeley. Type material inadequate.

Friesiana, South America, Spegazzini=Polystictus villosus.

glabra, Africa, Palisot. No type is said to exist, but there is a good picture.
Probably the same as Hexagona umbrinella.

glabra, India, Leveille. A hexagonal form of Lenzites ochroleucus.

gracilis, Brazil, Berkeley. Belongs to a section of Polyporus.

inconcinna, Philippines, Berkeley (as Daedalea) =Hexagona albida.

induratus, West Indies, Berkeley:=Hexagona Miquelii.

intermedia, Australia, Berkeley (as Daedalea) =Hexagona albida.

Klotzschii, Africa, Berkeley=Hexagona hirta.

Koenigii, Ceylon, Berkeley=effete Hexagona apiaria.

laevis, Pacific Island, Cooke, nondescript.

lurida, Java, Leveille=Hexagona glabra.

Marcucciana, Italy, Baglietto^Hexagona nitida.

Molkenboeri, Java, Leveille^Hexagona macrotrema, and based on same
collection.

Mori, Italy, Marcucci (as Favolus)=Hexagona nitida.
44

Muelleri, Australia, Berkeley. Too close to Hexagona rigida.

nigro-cincta, Pacific Island, Patouillard:=pale form of rigida.

orbiculata, Africa, Fries=Hexagona tenuis.

obversa, Africa, Patouillard. Too close to chartacea.

pallens, Mexico, Saccardo. Unknown to me

pallida, African Islands, Schroter. Unknown to me.

papyracea, locality unknown, Berkeley^Hexagona variegata.

peltata, Africa, Fries. No type exists.

pergamenea, Ceylon, Berkeley. Not a Hexagona. Close to Polystictus
dermatodes.

picta, East Indies, Berkeley. Type inadequate.

pustulosus, Java, Leveille=:Hexagona Miquelii.

sericea, United States, Fries:=Polystictus villosus.

sericeo-hirsuta, United States, Klotzsch (as Polyporus)= Polystictus villosus.

sinensis, Africa, Klotzsch=Hexagona hirta.

sinensis, China, Fries. In reality merely a change of name of Boletus favus,
of which no type exists. Fries states "v. s.," but the specimen he saw was from
Klotzsch and was Hexagona hirta.

strigosa, Africa, (Mss. name) Cooke=iHexagona hirta. It was published
as Trametes adelphica.

Stuhlmanni, Africa, Hennings=Hexagona Pobeguini.

subaculeata, Borneo, Cesati. Unknown to me.

subrigida, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown to me.

tabacina, Java, Leveille Not a Hexagona, but the same as Polystictus
cichoriaceus. Leveille also discovered the same plant was another "new species"
in another genus and called it Polyporus fuscus, but little matters of this kind
did not bother Leveille.

Taxodii, United States, Murrill=Hexagona cucullata, teste the author.

Thollonis, Africa, Patouillard. Unknown to me. Type is at Brussels,
but not seen by me.

Thwaitesii, Japan, Berkeley^Hexagona tenuis. Thwaite collected in Ceylon,
and had nothing to do with this plant from the island of Bonin. Why it was
named after him I do not know.

tricolor, Africa, Fries. No type exists. From the description I think it is
the same as Hexagona discopoda.

unicolor, Africa, Fries. No type exists.

velutina, China (published?), Patouillard=iHexagona bipindiensis.

versicolor (ascribed to Fries). No such plant was named or published,
which, however, did not prevent Spegazzini from so determining specimens.

vitellina, Borneo, Cesati. Unknown to me, but I have not much faith in
there being a yellow Hexagona.

vittata, Central America, Ellis=Polystictus villosus.

Welwitschii, Africa, Smith— Hexagona Pobeguini.

Wightii, India, Klotzsch=Hexagona apiaria, but in the museums mostly
known under this name.

Note.— There is a variation in the spelling of the generic name. Some spell
it Hexagona, others Hexagonia.

45

INDEX TO THE SPECIES OF HEXAGONA.

Those marked with a star (*) ar
varieties or are of minor importance.

Aculeata 9

e perhaps better called sub-species or

Miquelii 36
Mirabilis 11

Albida

29

Niam-niamensis
Nitida ...

18

Amplexens

6

Ochroleuca

•• 3i

Atrosanguinea
Bipindiensis

27
36

26

Pobeguini

17

g

Polygramma*
Pulchella*

25

2T

20

Concinna* . . .

26

Resinosa

16

Cucullata

-1C

Rhombipora*
Rigida
Sacleuxii

34
26

27

Deschampsii

9

26

Duricsima*

16

Scutigera*

13

Dybowski

ii

Seurati

33

Elegans

q

Similis*

• • 27

21

Krubescens

21

15.

26

Henschalli

Sulcata

I^

Heteropora . .

-jq

Tenuis

23

Hirta ..

Umbrinella* . ........

26

Kurzii

. ... 21

12

Leprosa

Velutina*

14

Macrotrema* .

. TO

Vesoacea* . ....

. 33

SYNOPSIS

OF THE SECTIONS

MICROPORUS, TABACINUS AND FUNALES

OF THE GENUS

POLYSTICTUS

By

C. G. LLOYD

CINCINNATI, OHIO, - AUGUST, 1910

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFC

AT LOS A

JAN 2 01942

N. PATOUILLARD.

To Monsieur N. Patouillard, Paris, France, I beg to dedicate this pamphlet,

in recognition of his eminent standing as a mycologist, and his

many favors to me. — C. G. LLOYD.

THE SECTION MICROPORUS OF POLYSTICTUS.

The subject of the Polyporoids is so extensive, there being about
two thousand alleged species, that one can not hope to do much with
it as a whole without first breaking it up into sections and studying
them one at a time.

The section Microporus is a very natural section, although it runs
through thicker forms into Polyporus. The characters of the section
are the thin, rigid pileus, the minute pores in a very thin layer, and
the color. It is usually stipitate, but the stipe varies much in length and
insertion. In some specimens it is mesopodal, and sometimes in others
of the same collection it is pleuropodal or lateral. In some specimens
it is black, and in others yellow. The color of the pores is usually
white when fresh, though sometimes, I think, yellowish, and in the
herbarium specimens they usually change to isabelline or wood color.
The surface is either smooth, minutely velvety, or zoned with pubescent
zones. The color of the pileus is reddish brown, bay, or sienna brown.
It varies in degree to almost black in depth, but the "ground color''
is always the same.

The "species" are extremely variable and run into each other in a most
puzzling manner. They could he called one species, which would be the easiest
way to dispose of the matter. The objection to this would be that the extreme
forms vary so much that it does not seem possible to include all in one species.
And these different forms do have a value, for in the same collection the
specimens are usually much alike and there is undoubtedly a geographical sig-
nificance in these forms.

The species are distributed in Saccardo through two sections, "Sacri," a
mesopodal section, and "Discipedes," a lateral stemmed section. This arrange-
ment is quite embarrassing from the fact that in the same collection are speci-
mens that belong to both sections. At the same time the insertion of the stem
is the best leading character to divide the species. Most collections and un-
doubtedly most localities show a decided preponderance of specimens in favor
•of one or the other series.

We believe that a few definite ideas should be associated with each "species, '
and may be expressed in a very few words. Under this plan most of the
specimens will readily fall into some "species" though no plan can be devised
that will cover every case. Even in the same collection individual specimens
may deviate. However, collections should be classed by their prevalent char-
acters and not from any one specimen. There are two extreme forms: Poly-
stictus xanthopus with a central yellow stem and glabrous pileus, and Poly-
stictus flabelliformis with a lateral, black stem and pubescent, zoned pileus.
All the species can be arranged between these two extremes.

Key to the species.
Stipe mesopodal —

Stipe smooth, yellowish. Pileus glabrous xanthopus

Stipe black. Pileus, soft -velvety concmnus

Stipe black. Pileus with pubescent zones • • • • Holsti

Stipe black. Pileus densely pubescent pseudo-pere

Stipe lateral —

Stipe concolorous or black. Pileus glabrous ami

Same character but a thicker, more robust plant

American form (probably the same) porphyntis

Stipe black. Pileus dark, almost black; smooth. Pores

Fdark carneo-mger

Stipe black. Pileus with pubescent zones . .
49

Stipe none — Microporus-Apus. (The section Microporus might
be confined to stipitate species, and a new section made for
the sessile species. As it has exactly the same texture,
color, and pores, and a piece of the pileus of one can not be
told from a piece of the pileus of the other, I think they
should be classed together.) Pileus smooth. Pores white. . . .pterygodes

Geographical Distribution. — The home of these plants is Africa, where they
grow in the greatest abundance, but they occur over the East Indies, India,
Ceylon, Philippines, Australia, and the Pacific Islands. Generally speaking
both the mesopodal and the pleuropodal species occur over this vast territory,
but the African collections run to mesopodal species and those of the Pacific
Islands to pleuropodal species.1 In tropical America they are very rare. But
two species I think are known from tropical America, viz. : porphyritrs and
pterygodes, and but very few collections of these.2 In our consideration of

Fig. 336

Polystictus xanthopus.

the species we shall only give the prominent key characters. We deem it useless
to repeat under each the characters common to all, as many of the "descrip-
tions" are drawn up.

POLYSTICTUS XANTHOPUS (Fig. 336).— Stipe yellow,
smooth, varying in length from a cm. to five cm. or more, usually
central, often eccentric, but not lateral. Pileus smooth, even.

]In Samoa, where flabelliformis is very abundant, I have never seen a specimen of a
mesopodal form.

2In Fries' herbarium is a typical specimen of Polystictus xanthopus ascribed to Mexico,
but I think the locality is due to some error in labeling.

50

This is the most frequent species in Africa, though it occurs over most
of the territory where similar forms occur. It was probably first published
by Ehrenberg as Polyporus Katui and a good figure was given of it. Fries
named it xanthopus in the same year. I do not know which was prior, but
Fries had more influence and established his name, giving Ehrenberg's as a
synonym.3 Then Persoon published it, from Rawak, as Polyporus saccatus
and also gave a good figure of it. His specimen is at Paris. It is needless to
say that Persoon's name was soon dumped into synonymy.

Forms.

POLYSTICTUS FLORIDEUS.— Originally from India, it has a short,
thick yellow stem and a smooth, dark bay pileus. It can only !>•_• held as a
dark form of xanthopus.

Fig. 337.
Polystictus concintius.

POLYSTICTUS COXCIXXL'S (Fig. 337).— Stem slender,
black, usually central, but sometimes lateral. Pileus dark bay. faintly
zoned, covered with a fine. soft, don-ny. relrcty pubescence.

3 The type of Katui is in good condition at Berlin. No type of xanthopus «-xi--t>. thouiih
there are several specimens of Fries' naming.

51

This is a rare form, originally and beautifully figured by Palisot. It is
only known from Africa, and all but one of the specimens are in the museum
at Berlin. They were labeled by Dr. Hennings "Polystictus xanthopus form
nigripes," and Mr. Herter has endorsed on them the name "Polystictus Mild-
brachii."

Fig. 338.
Polystictus Holstii.

Fig. 339

Polystictus pseudo-perennis.

POLYSTICTUS HOLSTII (Fig. 338).— Stipe dark or black,
central. Pileus with pubescent zones.

52

This is an African form which is found in the museum both at Kew and
Berlin. At Kew the stems are more yellowish and it was referred as a variety
of xanthopus. Dr. Henmngs gave the same form the name as alx.vi

POLYSTICTUS PSEUDO-PEREXXIS (Fig. 339).— Pileus
densely covered with appressed velvety hairs, faintly zoned with nar-
row, subglobose zones. Pores minute, cinereous. Stem dark.

This is only known from one collection from Africa in tin- museum at
Berlin. It was referred by Dr. Hennings to Polystictus Holstii4 It is a
strongly marked plant and at first view does not seem to belong in this group.
The dense coat of pale, velvety hairs on the pileus and the size give it a re-
semblance to old, weathered specimens of Polystictus perennis.

Fig. 340.
Polystictus affinis.

POLYSTICTUS AFFIXIS (Fig. 340).— Stipe lateral, smooth,
dark bay, or black. Pileus smooth.

1 have not seen the type of this, but it was well illustrated by Xees von
Esenbeck. Plants corresponding to the figure are not rare in the museums,
though all plants so named in the museums do not correspond to the figure. It
is the form intermediate between the two extremes, with the smooth pileus of
xanthopus and the form and stem insertion of flabelliformis.

POLYSTICTUS LUTEUS (Fig. 341).— Stipe lateral, smooth,
dark. Pileus glabrous, but rugulose.

This plant was also well illustrated by Xees von Esenbeck. but badly
named, for it is no more "luteus" than any other species, nor is .it so shown.
It is practically the same plant as affinis except more robust, thicker, and
with more obese stem. Polystictus Makuensis from Africa is only an extremely
robust form. In the museums one often finds pale yellowish specimens of
Polystictus xanthopus determined as this species, but there is no warrant for
such determinations excepting that luteus is misnamed.-'1

4 As I remember it, it is the only collection in the Holstii cover, the types of Polystictus
Holstii being in the exhibition department.

3 Polystictus luteus does not occur in the United State?, nor is any similar plant found.
though a number so named by Herkeley are in existence. They should have been referred
to his own new species, Polystictus mutabilis.

53

Fig 341.
Polystictus luteus.

POLYSTICTUS PORPHYRITIS (Fig. 342).— This is the
American form, practically the same thing, 1 think, as affinis and luteus.

While I would wish to know
more about them before 1 put
them together, I know no rea-
son, except geographical, why
they should not be put to-
gether. It is a rare plant and
known surely only from the
"type" collection from Brazil.
Polystictus porphyritis is
the only truly stipitate mem-
I er of the section Microporus
found on the American conti-
nent, and this is known from
a single collection from Bra-
zil.6

Fig. 342.

Polystictus Porphyriti

POLYSTICTUS CARNEO-NIGER (Fig. 343).-
Pileus dark, almost black, smooth. Pores dark.

-Stipe lateral.

Specimens

referred from Cuba are very poor and not at al

54

This is an unusual form distinguished by the dark color of all the parts
PolystJctus celebicus as named from a single specimen at Berlin is the same

;.

Fig. 343.
Polystictus carneo-niger.

fie. 344.

Polystictus flabelliforinis.

Fis 345.

POLYSTICTUS FLABELLIFORMIS (Figs. 344 and 345).—
Stipe black, lateral. Pileus with pubescent zones.

This was originally from Mauritius and the type 4s at Kew. It is common
over a wide territory and particularly in the Pacific Islands. I found it

55

abundantly in Samoa and am satisfied that it is the only form on the island.
but I have seen this Samoan plant in the museums under several names.7 As
we have previously stated, Polystictus flabelliformis may be considered the
extreme form at the other end of the arc from Polystictus xanthopus, and
all the intermediate "species" between can be held to be connecting forms.

RELATED SECTION, MICROPORUS-APUS.

If I were dividing Polystictus into genera I should hold a stipe as the first
badge of a genus, but like all characters I would want to disregard it at times.
There is one species of sessile fungi that accords with the section Microporus
in every character except that it has no stipe. We shall consider it here.

Fig. 348
Polystictus pterygodes.

POLYSTICTUS PTERYGODES (Fig. 346).— Pileus sessile..
thin, smooth, rigid, dark bay color. Pores minute, pale or white.

Pieces of the pileus of Polystictus pterygodes and Polystictus xanthopus
could scarcely be distinguished. With the exception of stem characters they
are practically the same. The context of pterygodes is a little thicker. Poly-
stictus pterygodes was originally from Africa, but it is a rare plant. Xo type
exists, but there is a good illustration and Fries' description. Recently speci-
mens have reached Europe from the Philippines that accord with both Fries'
description and figure. It is also known, but rarely, from South America. H
I have recently received specimens from Rev. Rick, Brazil.

NOMINA CONSERVANDA.

We give the following statistical matter with reference to names used in
this article, as it is usually held to be of much more importance than the identity

but

Mauritius (Fig. 344) was densely

ith pubescent zones

The type form fr

s it occurs in Samoa it is much smoother, with only a few pubescent zones, and they
not strongly developed (Fig. 3.45). But the pileus of the Samoan form is never entirely
smooth, hence I would refer it to flabelliformis rather than to affinis.

8 Fries described Polyporus modestus as named by Kunze in Weigel's exsiccatae, from
Surinam. The type is therefore the one in Fries' herbarium at Upsala. The specimen in
Weigel's exsiccatae at Kew is not the same as the one at Upsala, but as Berkeley thought it
was the same, Polyporus modestus in the sense of Berkeley (excepting his very early deter-
mination) is not the same as Polyporus modestus in the sense of Fries. Polyporus modestus
of Berkeley is Polyporus pterygodes of Fries, and Polyporus modestus of Fries was Polyp >ms
r.lbo-cervinus of Berkeley, and also other "new species" of his, if I mistake not.

56

of the plants named. We include the name of the country from whence the
species was named, the book reference where it was "described," the museum
in which the type is found, and what is of most importance ( to them ) tin-
names of the namers.

AFFINIS— Java.— Xova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop. Car. vol. 13. t. iv, p. 18.
Xees ab Ksenbeck. type not known to me.

CARNEO-NIGER— Australia.— Grcvillca, vol. xii, p. 15, Cooke. type at
Kew. ,

CONCINNUS— Africa.— I'lored'Owarc, PI. 43, p. 73. Palisot-de-Heanvois.
Type, if it exists, is at Geneva.

FLABELLIFORMIS— Mauritius.— Linnaea, vol. 8, p. 483. Klotzsche.
Type at Kew.

FLORIDEUS— India.— Hooker's Journal, 1854. p. 137, Berkeley. Type
at Kew.

HOLSTII— Africa.— "Pilze Ostafr, p. 57," Hennings. Type in exhibition
department in museum at Berlin.

LUTEUS— Java.— Xova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop. Car. Vol. 13, t iv. p. 16.
Vis al) Ksenbeck. Type not known to me.

PORPHYRITIS— Brazil.— Hooker's Journal, 1856, p. 196. Type at Kew.

PSEUDO-PERENNIS— Africa.— Description on page 53. Type in
museum at Berlin.

PTERYGpDES— Africa.— Kpicrisis, p. 445, figure Rel. Af/elianae t. 3.
fig. 7, Fries. No type exists.

XANTHpPUS— Africa.— Obs. Mycol. vol. 2, p. 255, Fries. Type does
not exist in Fries' herbarium, but there are others of his naming.

SYXOXYMS.

In our opinion the following names belonging in this section should have
been mostly referred to "old species." We give the country from whence de-
scribed, the name of the di^cover^r, and the museum where the type is pre-
served. In ^ase of a mss. name only we do not give the author as we feel a
man should only be held responsible when he goes into print.

celebicus, East Indies, Hennings. Type at Berlin=carneo-niger.

crassipes, India, Currey. Type at Kew=xanthopus.

cupro-nitens, Australia, Kalchbrenner. Co-type at Kew=xanthopu*.

incomptus, Africa, Fries. Type at Upsala^flabelliformis.

Katui, Marshall Island, Khrenberg. Type at Berlin=xanthopus. Whether
prior or not is unknown to me. It was beautifully illustrated, published the
same year, and on its merits this name should have been used.

licmophorus, India, Massee=affinis. Type at Kew.

Makuensis, Africa, Cooke=luteus. Same exactly as Xees figured only
larger. Type at Kew.

microloma, Philippines, Leveille. Unknown to me. Seems from description
to be flabelliformis.

Mildbrachii, Africa, mss. name, at Berlin=concinnus.

modestus in the sense of Berkeley only (not the type at Upsala)=pterygodes.

Perula, Africa, Palisot. Figure seems to be a depauperate xanthopus.

saccatus. Island Rawak, Persoon. Type at Paris=xanthopus.

squamaeformis, Borneo, Berkeley. Xo type exists, but specimens so deter-
mined by Cooke are small forms of affinis. Murrill refers it to badius. which
appears to have been a bad guess.

subverniceps, Philippines. Murrill. Co-type collection at Bcrlm=pterygodes.

Teysmanni, Tasmania, mss. name at Kew— affinis.

subvernicosus from Brazil. According to a photograph I made of the
type seems close to porphyritis. but having misplaced my notes I would not
give it as a synonym without a reexamination.

57

THE SECTION TABACINUS OF POLYSTICTUS'

The group of species that was separated by Patoulllarcl under the
very inappropriate name Cyclomyces is a very natural group if one
disregards hymenial configuration. As to the color, texture, surface,
thickness, and general appearance they are much the same. In addi-
tion they are characterized by having on the hymenium colored setae
(often called cystidia) similar to those on which was based the genus
Hymenochaete in the Thelephoraceae. We look upon hymenial con-
figuration as of first importance, and hence do not take the section in
exactly the same sense as does Patouillard, excluding from it the cy-
clomycoid species, Cyclomyces fuscus.10

Color. — The color of all specimens when dry is a dark brown, well desig-
nated by Montagne as tabacinus in the naming of the first species. Ail portions
of the plant, hairs, surface, context, and pores, are a very similar color. When
moist they are darker, almost black.

Surface. — All have pilei very similar as to the surface. It is unicolorous,
velvety with a thick coat of fine, silky hairs, and concentrically zoned, with
raised zones. One species could hardly be told from another from the upper
surface of the pileus.

Spores. — The spores are stated by Patouillard to be -white*1 and I do not
question it, though I have not found them. Compare note 2, page i, of Hexagona
Synopsis.

Colored setae. — On all species there are abundant, sharp, dark-colored setae
on the hymenium. These are easily seen with a low power microscope.

Distinction of species.— The other characters being practically the same,
the only one on which species can be based is the size of the pores. These are
of three grades :

Pores minute Polystictus tabacinus.

Pores medium Polystictus iodinus.

Pores large Polystictus cichoriaceus.

While the usual collection can be referred to one or the other of these species
on the average pore size, no doubt many connecting sizes occur and all can
be referred to one "species" on the evidence of connecting forms. All species
favor the warm countries and are absent from Europe and from the United
States except in the South. The small pored specimens are more common
in tropical America, the larger pored specimens in the East.

History. — The first species reached Montagne from Chile and was named
Polyporus tabacinus. Next he got a slightly larger pored form from French
Guiana which was called Polyporus iodinus. Then Berkeley received the largest

10 Pores of the larger pored species sometimes show a tendency to become cyclomycoid,
particularly in the one specimen known of Polystictus campylopprus. I have no doubt if we
knew all the connecting forms there would be a continuous series from Polystictus tabacinus
on one hand to Cyclomyces fuscus on the other.

Mr. Murrill purloined the idea of this "genus" from Patouillard, and juggled the name
just a little to Cyclomycetella. He took as his type species Polystictus pavonius, which does
not belong to it and has little resemblance to it. When he found what blunder he had made in
publishing that Polystictus pavonius was a synonym for Polystictus iodinus he patched up the
matter with a new Juggle, this time Cycloporellus and a new "type species," Polystictus iodi-
nus. A "type species seems to be a movable affair that may be shifted around at pleasure
to meet the exigencies of the juggler.

11 As an illustration of the modern method of discovering "new genera" now in vogue,
Mr. Murrill, when he discovered this "new genus," based it on the color of the spores, which
he states are brown, and includes it in the section with brown spores. The spores are stated
by Patouillard to be white, and no doubt truly. To make his inconsistency complete,
Mr. Murrill discovered a new species, barbatulus, or rather he discovered an old species, the
first one named tabacinus, which he called new, and described the spores as hyaline. If they
are hyaline I can not understand why he should include it in a new genus which he had dis-
covered, with "brown" spores as the type character.

58

pored form from the Philippines, which was called Polyporus intybaccus, hut
the name being preoccupied it was changed to Polyporus cichoriaceus. A single
collection of a large, irregularly pored form was called P. campyloporus by
Montagne, and a thick form of P. cichoriaceus was named P. setiporus by
Berkeley. The remainder of the history is the rediscovery and renaming of
the same things by Leveille, Junghuhn, and Murrill. Leyeille discovered three
"new species," all new only to him, and two of them, which he put in different
genera, were the same plant.

POLYSTICTUS TABACINUS (Fig. 347). — Dark tobacco-
brovvn. Surface finely velutinate and with narrow, raised, concentric
zone?. Pores minute, round, dark. Colored setae abundant.

Fig. 347

Polystictus tabacimis

Fig. 348
Polystictus iodiuus.

This species with minute pores was originally from Chile, but occurs also
in Africa, the East Indies, and is particularly abundant in Australia,
pores are usually darker than the context- and I have Australian collectio

59

which the pores are really black. I have never seen it from the southern United
States. The specimens so distributed by Ellis should have been referred to
Polystictus iodinus.

POLYSTICTUS IODIXUS (Fig. 348).— This is the same plant
as the preceding, excepting it has larger pores. The color is a lighter
shade of brown, and the color of pores and context are more uniform.
It was named from French Guiana, and seems to be the most common
form in northetti South America, the West Indies, and southern
United States.

Fig. 349.
Polyslictus campyloporus.

Form— POLYSTICTUS CAMPYLOPORUS (Fig. 349).— Known from a
single collection from French Guiana is only a form of Polystictus iodinus,
tending toward Cyclomyces fuscus. It is a curious fact that Cyclomyces fuscus,
which is common in the East Indies and occurs in Africa and the Philippines
with typically cyclomycoid gills, is absent from the American tropics, this form
being the nearest approach we have to it.

POLYSTICTUS CICHORIACEUS (Fig. 350').— Pileus thin,
lobed, imbricate, with brown, velutinate, zoned surface. Pores rather
large, angular, dark.

This species was originally from the Philippines and was named intybaceus.
The name was changed to cichoriaceus when it was found that intybaceus had
been used. I judge the name refers to the plant cichorium and its lobed leaves.
This, which is the most common species in the East Indies and the East in
general, I found abundantly in Samoa. It is thinner and more lobed than the
American plant Polystictus iodinus, which it otherwise closely resembles.

POLYSTICTUS SETIPORUS (Fig. 351).— This has the same sized pores
as Polystictus cichoriaceus and 1 think must be referred as a form. It is thicker
and more -even, which is the orriy difference I can note. It came from Ceylon.

60

When Berkeley named it he noticed the colored setae on the hynieniuin. gave
a good figure of them, and named the plant in accordance. He had not noted
these setae on his previously named species, Polystictus cichoriaceus, and it
is evident that he was never aware of what a common character these setae
are on the hymenium of hrown polyporoids.

Fig. 350

Polystictus cichoriaceus.

Fig. 351
Polystictus setiporus.

61

NOMINA CONSERVANDA.

Those with a star are better varieties or forms.

CAMP YLOPORUS*— South America.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 4, vol. i, p. 132,
Montague. Type in museum at Paris. It is only a sub-cyclomycoid form of
Polystictus iodinus.

CICHORIACEUS— Philippines.— Hooker's Journal, 1842, p. 149 (as in-
tybaceus, afterwards changed to cichoriaceus), Berkeley. Type at Kew, also
co-type at Berlin.

IODINUS— South America.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 2, vol. 16, p. 108, Montague.
Type in museum at Paris.

SETIPORUS*— Ceylon.— Hooker's Journal, 1847, p. 505, Berkeley. Type
at Kew. In my opinion only a thicker form of cichoriaceus.

TABACINUS— Chile.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 2, vol. 3, p. 349, Montague. Type
in museum at Paris, also co-type at Kew and Upsala.

SYNONYMS.

barbatulus, Philippines, Murrill=tabacinus (co-type at Kew).

fuscus, Java, Leveille=cichoriaceus. Type at Paris.

intybaceus, Philippines, Berkeley. Name changed to cichoriaceus.

micrpcyclus, Java, Levaille=rtabacinus. Co-type at Kew.

spadiceus, Junghuhn, Java=tabacinus, teste Bresadola on a label. I have
not seen authentic material.

tabacinus, Java, Leveille (as Hexagona):=cichoriaceus. Co-type in her-
barium of Patouillard.

transiens, Borneo, Cesati (as Favolus, sic) =Polystictus cichoriaceus, co-
type at Kew.

xerampelinus, Australia, Kalchbrenner— tabacinus. Type at Kew.

62

THE SECTION FUNALES OF POLYSTICTUS.

There occur in the tropics a few species, but abundant specimens
that are covered with a thick, dense mat of coarse fibrils resembling
the shaggy coat of some animal. These fibrils are closely interwoven
and united into bundles and are almost dense enough to be called a
tissue, in fact, the thin context of the plants is resolved into this coat

Fig. 352.

Section of Polystictus leouinus Xt> .

of fibrils. Our figure 352 (x6), a section, will give a good idea of this
structure. The pores are large and angular and, in the East Indian
.species, are disposed to become irpicoid. The spores are supposed to
be white.

I think there are but two real species in this section, Polystictus leoninus,
which occurs in abundance in the East Indies, Ceylon, India, and Africa, but
very rarely if at all in America.12 and Polystictus trichomallus which occurs
in tropical America in abundance but is unknown from other tropical countries.
It is a curious fact regarding these two common tropical species, each is
abundant in its own territory and neither encroaches on the territory of the
other.

History. — Fries was the first to separate these plants as a section of
Polystictus, then Patouillard discovered them to be a new genus. Cooke main-
tained the section in his arrangement and it has been carried into Saccardo,
but a number of plants were included in the section in Saccardo that really
do not belong to it. Mr. Murrill distorts the meaning entirely and included
plants that do not have the pileate structure, and then discovers that plants
with this structure form a "new genus," characterized mainly by the same
characters as the old section Funales.

12 Taking the view that Polystictus stupeus is not the same plant.
63

POLYSTICTUS LEONINUS (Fig. 353).— Color light fauve or
fulvous, well likened by Klotzsch to that of a lion, in the naming of
the species. The entire plant, including the pores and the matted sur-
face, is of a similar color when fresh, but in old specimens the color
becomes darker. Context, a thin layer covering the pores and merging
into the superlaying thick coat of matted hairs. These hairs are
densely branched and interwoven, and form bundles of tissue similar
to the context. Pores are large, angular, and the edges are prolonged
into irpicoid teeth. Spores are supposed to be white.

Fig. 353.
Polystictus leoninus.

Distribution. — This is a very common plant found in Africa, India, and
the East Indies, and the East in general.

History. — It first reached Hooker from Dr. Wight, India, and was named
by Klotzsch Polyporus leoninus, from a resemblance to the color of a lion.
Then Fries received it from Africa and called it Polyporus funalis.13 His
specimens are exactly the same as those of K lot z sell so far as I can note on
comparison of the two types. Most of the specimens in the museums are
under the Friesian name. Junghuhn collected the plant in Java and called it
Polyporus Mons Veneris.14

Forms.

The three "species" previously mentioned do not differ from each other
in the ieast that I can note and the following appeals to me as being a form.

13 From the cordlike bundles of matted hairs.

14 I have not seen his specimen, but it is referred to funalis by Montagne, and Junghulu
figure shows no difference. I do not question that it is a synonym.

64

POLYSTICTUS DYBOWSKI (Fig. 354>.-With the same nature color
pores, and partial range, but with much finer hairs on the pileus I should con-
sider it as a form of Polystictus leonmus. It came from Africa but w- s not
named for one of the natives as might be inferred from its name.

Fig. 354.
Polystictus Dybowski.

POLYSTICTUS STUPEUS (Fig. 355).— Pileus rather thin,
with a dense coat of branching hairs. Pores large, regular, with thin
walls. Mouths even. Color of entire plant, including hairs, "fauve."

This is an American species with a curious history. It is rare in America
and I have never received it from a correspondent. I know of but four col-
lections, all at Kew. Berkeley found a small, unsatisfactory specimen in the
Richardson collection from British America which he named Trametes stupeus
and gave the locality "Carleton House, British Columbia, Apr. j.^rd." And
it is a curious coincidence that there is another collection at Kew made by
Palliser, who collected in British America, and is endorsed "Sur les vieux
troncs de Salix pres Carleton, 18 Mai, 1858." This was referred to Trametes
gallica1'"' but is the same as Polystictus stupeus, and apparently from the same
locality though some ten years after it was named. Then Berkeley «ot it
from Texas, Wright, and called it Trametes Lindheinieri."1 This collection
has smaller pores than the Canadian plant but otherwise seems close. In Cooke's
herbarium is a collection, 'Tndia, Herb. Griffith" that seems exactly the -;iinc
as the Canadian plant.

13 "Trametes gallica" was based on an old French figure, more than a hundred years old,
and has never been recognized in France to this day with certainty. In his forty years' ex-
perience Botidier tells me he thinks he has seen it twice. The improbability of its being found
in British America I presume never appealed to the man who so referred this collection.

10 A good type specimen is at Kew, in good condition, not eaten at all by insects, as has
been misstated, and our figure 355 is made from it.

65

Polystfctus stupeus is a species intermediate between Polystictus leoninus
and Trametes hispida. It has the same color as P. leoninus and the same large
pores, which however do not show a tendency to become irpicoid. It is not
a true Funales for the context is more compact. Still it approaches this section
and the hairs are of the same general nature as those of Polystictus leoninus.

Fie, 355

Polystictus stupeus

POLYSTICTUS TRICHOMALLUS (Fig. 356).— The entire
plant is a dark fuliginous color, by which it can be known at once
from leoninus. Pores dark, fuliginous, irregular, sinuate, daedaloid,
with thin, sometimes somewhat irpicoid edges. Context practically
none, being replaced by a dense, thick coat of matted, rigid, almost
black hairs.

This is a most abundant plant in tropical America (Mexico, Central
America, West Indies, Brazil, etc.) and there are many collections in the
museums. It is not known to occur in any other tropical region, however,
except America. It seems to have reached Europe first from French Guiana,
collected by Poiteau. It was named Polyporus Perrottetii, by Leveille, who
however published it as coming from Perrottet, Java.17 Then five years later
Montagne described the plant as Polyporus trichomallus front this same col-
lection, and every one without exception since has used Montagne's name,
notwithstanding that all leeal authority provides to the contrary.18

Notes 17 and 18 on next page.

66

•'

Fig. 356.
Polysiictus trichor

17 RareTy have new species promoters clone more careless work than did Leveille with this
plant. Ihe type is at Paris in good condition and is labeled "Polyporus (Trametes) Perrot-
tetn, Lev., in Leveille's writing and on a printed label "Guyane francaise, M. Poiteau."
Leveille named it after Perrottet, who not only did not collect it, but never collected any-
thing at all like it.

That this specimen is the type there is no question. First, it answers Leveille's descrip-
tion. Second, Leveille states he saw the plant in the Museum at Paris, and there are no
plants collected in Java by Perrottet in the Museum at Paris. Third, no plant that can be
confused with it grows in Java. Fourth, it is labeled by Leveille himself.

Leveille published it in 1844. Mr. Murrill uses a name published in 1849. It seems

to me this is not giving due respect to the sacred principles of priority nor
"rules."

those celebrated

18 When I received the plant from tropical America I sent it to a good mycologist in
Europe, who named it for me Polystictus funalis, and I have always supposed that this was
its name until I studied the subject in the museums of Europe. I have so named it for one
or two correspondents. Ellis seems to have had the same misinformation given to him, as he
usually so named it. While in America we had no way of knowing the difference, in Europe
they should have known better, as there are abundant specimens of both species in all the
European museums, and the two species have little resemblance to each other.

67

Related Plants.

There are a number of related plants with coats of coarse hairs on the
pileus that have been included in the section Funales. I think, however, the
section should be restricted practically to the two species leoninus and tricho-
mallus where the context is replaced by this dense layer of matted hairs. We
would include in another section those species in which the hairs are more
on the surface, such as cladotrichus, aculeifer, versatilis, philippinensis, ozonioides,
etc. Sometimes these plants are called Trametes and sometimes Polystictus.
We think no one really knows what a Trametes is, and a Polystictus is a thin
Trametes.

NOMINA CONSERVANDA.

DYBOWSKI— Africa.— Bull. Soc. Myc. vol. 8, p. 53, Patouillard. Type at
Paris, a fine haired form of leoninus.

LEONINUS— India.— Linnaea, vol. 8, p. 486. Klotzsch. Types at Kew,
Berlin, and Upsala.

STUPEUS— British America.-'*Ann. Nat. Hist. vol. 7, p. 453, Berkeley.
Type at Kew.

TRICHOMALLUS— South America.— Ann. Sci. Nat. 3, vol. 11, p. 238,
Montagne. Type in museum at Paris.

SYNONYMS AND MISPLACED SPECIES.

We list here all those species that have been referred to the section Funales,
though a number do not belong to it. While we give the authors responsible
for the "species," it must not be inferred that they are always responsible for
the plants being put in Funales. In most instances that was done by others.

aculeifer, Cuba, Berkeley. I think it is better classed in Polystictus, sec-
tion Hirtus.

andina, South America, Patouillard, same remarks.

endothrix, Brazil, Berkeley=trichomallus, based on a single thick specimen,
surely the same as trichomallus. Type at Kew.

ciliata, Klotzsch, Philippines=Polystictus versatilis. Type at Berlin.

cilicioides, Philippines, Friesi=Polystictus versatilis and based on the same
collection. Type at Upsala.

cladotrichus, Cuba, Berkeley, better classed in section Hirtus.

Fergusoni, Africa, Cooke=Trametes hispida. Type at Kew.

funalis, Africa, Fries= Polystictus leoninus. In the museums the plant is
usually known under this name. Type at Upsala.

hispidula, Cuba, Berkeley, only "known from the type locality" and not
well known from there as the types are small and unsatisfactory. Probably
Trametes hispida, I think. Type at Kew.

holophaeus, Europe, Montagne= Polyporus Schweinitzii. Type at Paris,
also co-type at Kew.

leonotus, Australia, Kalchbrenner. No authentic material known to me. A
specimen so labeled in a jar in the Museum at Upsala, but the determination is
doubtful, as is the species.

Lindheimeri, United States (Texas), Berkeley=Polystictus stupeus. A good
type is at Kew, and our figure 355 of stupeus is made from this specimen.

ozonioides, India, Berkeley, better classed in the section Hirtus.

Peckii, United States, Kalchbrenner. It is not a synonym for Polystictus
stupeus as recently stated, but is a synonym for Trametes hispida, a common
plant in the United States, but not compiled in N. A. F., other than this mis-
reference to stupeus. Peckii is exactly the same plant as hispida of Europe
and a different plant in my opinion from stupeus, in not having branched,
compound hairs on the pileus. That stupeus and hispida may run into each
other I think probable, but stupeus does not occur in Europe and hispida (or
Peckii) is common in Europe. Type of Peckii at Berlin.

68

Perrottetii, South America, Leveille=Polystictus trichomatlus and not only
a prior name for it, but described from the same collection. It was erroneously
stated to have been collected by Perrottet in Java. Type at Paris.

Philippinensis, Philippines, Murrill. Better classed in the section Hirtus or
Setosus.

versatilis, Philippines, Berkeley. Better classed in section Hirtus.

villosus, Jamaica, Swartz. The type at the British Muse«m is the common
plant in the tropics, usually called Polystictus pinsitus, and while specimens
so named by Fries are in existence, I now think the name should be confined
to the white pored form that occurs in Brazil, and that this dark pored form
should be called Polystictus villosus. Mr. Murrill never saw Swartz's specimen,
but that did not deter him from applying Swartz's name to Polystictus versatilis,
a most abundant species in the tropics which has little resemblance to it. He
not only guessed at it, but he made a very bad guess.

INDEX TO THE SPECIES OF POLYSTICTUS.

Those marked with a star (*) are perhaps better called sub-spec
of minor importance.

es or are

Section Microporus

Section Tabacinus.

Affinis

• 53

Campyloporus*

.. 60

Carneo-niger

• 54

Cichoriaceus

.. 60

Concinnus

• 51

T 1'

60

Flabelliformis

• 55

60

Florideus*

• 51

Sctiporus

Tabacinus

• • 59

Holstii

52

Luteus

33

Section Funales.

Porphyritis

C.)

Dybowski*

.. 65

Pseudo-perennis

•• 53

Leoninus

.. 64

Ptervgodes

56

Stupeus

- 65

Xanthopus

.. 5c

Trichomallus

.. 66

70

SYNOPSIS

OF THE

SECTION QVINUS
of POLYPORUS

By

C. G. LLOYD.

CINCINNATI, OHIO, . OCTOBER, 1911.

Of fY

AT L03 ANGELES

JAN 2 01342

LARS ROMELL.

To my good friend, L. Romell, Stockholm, Sweden, who has the best
knowledge of Swedish fungi of any mycologist, I beg to dedicate this pamphlet
in recognition and appreciation of the many kindnesses and favors received
from him, — C. G. LLOYD,

THE SECTION OVINUS OF POLYPORUS.

Pileus borne on a stem which is central or more or less excentric.
Fleshy, usually obese, plants growing in the ground, rarely on wood.

In dividing the Polyporei into sections we think the best and simplest plan
is to follow the lines laid out by Fries, and the section Ovinus is the first
division in the Friesian system. We would modify it slightly by including also
the fleshy plants with black stems, which Fries kept out as a separate section
As applied only to the plants of Europe the "black stems" are quite a natural
group in the mam for the most of them are really forms of two species (Poly-
porus vanus and squamosus). In foreign species however it would remove from
Ovinus such plants as Polyporus radicatus and Hartmanni, which so evidently
belong to Ovinus in their leading characters that we think should be so included.

The presence or absence of a stipe is of as much value as a character in
dividing Polyporei as any other one character, and we would make it the basis
of the first division of the subject. Most species that have stipes have them
always except in some abnormal cases, and species devoid of stipes do not develop
them excepting rarely when growing in abnormal positions.1 Fries used the stipe
character as a leading idea in the division of the Polypores and we believe it is
a wise arrangement.

The advantages of the Friesian system are that it is probably as natural and
as convenient an arrangement as can be devised; that it has been generally ac-
cepted and used for many years and that most of our text-books have employed
it, and most of the species have been named in accordance with it. The dis-
advantages of the system are that genera are large and unwieldy, but I believe
the proper plan would be to break the genera up into a few natural sections
and they may in time come into use, just as the old sections of the old genus
Agaricus have come into general use as genera.

All of the species of Polyporus which we include in the section Ovinus
have pale flesh and white spores. There is one Indian species, Polyporus indicus.
with colored flesh and spores that might be placed here. However, the flesh is
more tough and dry and we would include it in another section.

History of the juggling. — Karsten (1881) discovered that the section
Ovinus of Fries was a "new genus" which he called Polyporus, and would have
us believe that this was all the Polyporus that exists. Quelet (1886) discovered
the same species to be a "new genus" which he called Caloporus and two years
later he added other plants that he also called Caloporus.2 Patouillard (1900)
united the sections Ovinus and Merismus of Fries which he called Polyporus
and would call all others by different names. And last but not least our own Mr.
Murrill made the remarkable discovery that the section Ovinus of Fries was
the same as Scutiger in the sense of Paulet, and on the strength of this won-
derful discovery wrote the name "MurriH" after each of the dozen (alleged)
species that he considered.*

1 There are cases that violate the rule, thus Polyporus Schweimtzii when growing from the
earth or a buried stick will normally have a central stipe, often an excentric or even a lateral stipe,
and when growing on the side of a tree it is usually dimidiate, attached by a broad, sessile base.
These exceptions, while embarrassing to the general arrangement of species on the character of a
stipe, do not necessarily make void the character, for the species should be classed on its normal
characters.

2 Quelet juggled names so freely that the names were largely changed in every work he wrote.
He gave no more thought to changing a plant name than he would to changing his cravat. His
juggling was done without any definite plan. The only idea he seems to have had was to use names
not used by Fries or others.

3 Paulet was one of the first crude writers on fungus and did not have the most vague idea of
their relationships. He included in Scutiger two polyporoids (sic , four hydnums sic . and an agarn

sic . How Mr Murrill reached the conclusion that this misfit aggregation of Paulet is the same as
the section Ovinus of Fries we will leave to our readers to guess. It is beyond our comprenen>ion.

73

Distribution. — I think we have a fairly good knowledge of the species that
occur in Europe and the United States. In Europe ovinus and confluens are
the most frequent species of this section in the pine woods of northern Europe.
Squamosus is common all through Europe. Tuberaster, leucomelas, griseus,
cristatus, pes caprae, squamatus and Boucheanus are the rare species of Europe.
Politus is only known from an old collection.

In the United States griseus and radicatus are most frequently collected.
Caeruliporus, confluens, Pes caprae, Ellisii and squamosus are more rare.

Very little is known of the species of foreign countries. Of the thirteen
collections received in Europe from foreign countries twelve of them have been
found to be "new species." It is needless to say that the subject is not exhausted
nor a great deal known of the distribution from the single collection known
of each of these "new species."

Divisions of the section Ovinus.— We would arrange the species
into a few groups, based on the most prominent characters.

ist. Species produced by a sclerotium page 74

2d. Stems usually mesopodial, pores small page 76

3d. Stems usually mesopodial, pores large page 79

4th. Stems usually excentric or irregular, pores small page 79

5th. Stems excentric, pores large page 83

Melanopus.

Stems black, at least at the base (all preceding do not have this character).

6th. Pores large page 85

7th. Pores small page 87

GROUP 1. SPECIES PRODUCED FROM A SCLEROTIUM.

There are several noteworthy Polyporoids that produce their fructification
from underground tubers or sclerotia as they are called. The best known in
Europe is Polyporus tuberaster; in Australia, Polyporus Mylittae; in Africa,
Polyporus sacer, which however we would not class in the section Ovinus.

POLYPORUS TUBERASTER.— Pileus fleshy, convex then in-
fundibuliform,4 yellowish, scaly when old. Flesh white. Pores white.
at first small, round, then larger and more angular. Spores large,
4 x 12, hyaline, smooth.

This plant, which is said to be "cultivated" and used as food in Italy is
rather rare in the museums of Europe. Most of the specimens I have seen were
collected by Trog in Switzerland. While it is called tuberaster it really does
not have a true sclerotium. The hard masses (known as Pietra in Italian, or
stones as translated in English) are formed of earth cemented into a stone-
like body by the mycelium of the fungus. They are said to be cultivated in
Italy to produce the fungus for food, somewhat in the same manner that mush-
rooms in our country are produced from spawn. A further account by Prof.
Mattirolo and illustration will be found on pages 92 and 93.

POLYPORUS GOETZII (Fig. 496).— Pileus umbonate, about
four inches in diameter, with a pale, dull, smooth surface. Pores large,
sub-angular with thin walls, pale colored or discolored but not fer-
ruginous I think. Stipe mesopodial, growing singly from a black

4 Strongly so as shown in Jacquin's plate. In the specimens found in the museums, mostly from
Trog, Switzerland, this character is not so pronounced, nor is it so shown in Venturi's plate, which
seems to be the best.

74

sclerotium about two inches in diameter. Spores said to be s-8 x 6-0
pale yellowish.5

This is known from

single specimen from Africa found in the museum

at Berlin. It has the sclerotium attached. Xo .llustration of it has been pu™
hshed heretofore. There is another species in Africa with a sclerotium (Poly
porus sacer) which seems to be much more common, but it is quite different
trom this.

Fig. 496
Polyporus Goetzii with sclerotium attached .

POLYPORUS SAPUREMA.— This species from Brazil has a
large sclerotium about eight inches in diameter, and Moeller records
large specimens weighing when dry more than twenty pounds.

5 I did not examine the spores, but I do not question that I should have found them white, as I
think few if any plants with such pale context have colored spores.

75

The only specimen known in Europe is in alcohol in the museum at Berlin.
In this specimen the sclerotium has produced three white, mesopodal fructifi-
cations. The pores are small and white. I think the species has never been
formally described,6 though the name was printed and a figure given in Engler
and Prantl. Professor Moeller seems to have been under the impression that
it may prove to be Polyporus tuberaster of Europe, which I think is not possible
as the latter does not have a true sclerotium.

POLYPORUS MYLITTAE.— For many years the tuber called
"native bread" has been known in Australia and like the Tuckahoe of
our southern United States its true nature was unknown.

Berkeley named it Mylitta australis and it was supposed to be related to the
Ascomycetes. In 1885 Mr. H. T. Tisdall found specimens that had developed
fructification of a Polyporus and he gave an account of it in the Victorian
Naturalist. It was sent to Kew and named Polyporus Mylittae. The pileus is
fleshy, tough, white with a short, deformed stem and white pores. The spores
were recorded as elliptical, 4x8. The specimen was not preserved as far as I
can find. I have seen a more elaborate account of this curious species with
illustrations in some Australian publication, but at present I can not place it.

Note — Polyporus tumulosus (see page 86) is supposed to produce large, conglomerate masses
of mycelium, " often found when trenching around Brisbane," but I can not see from the account that
the connection of the fungus is established with these masses. Polyporus basilapicliodes, an Aus-
tralian species, produces a very hard, conglomerate, mycelial mass. It is not classed in this section.
There are two other Polyporoids known to me that have true sclerotia, but I would class both in an-
other section. These are Polyporus sacer, which seems common in Africa, and Polyporus rhinocerotis,
known only from Malay.

GROUP 2. STEMS USUALLY MESOPODIAL, PORES SMALL.

POLYPORUS OVINUS (Fig. 497).— Pileus fleshy, white with
a. dull surface. Flesh firm, white. Stipe usually mesopodial, rarely
excentric, fleshy, white, similar in texture to the pileus. Pores
minute, round, regular. Spores subglobose, 3^-4, hyaline, smooth,
guttulate.

This is the most common plant in the group that grows in the pine woods
of Sweden. I have noted it in the market of Stockholm, and it is used as a
food. In central and southern Europe it is more rare, being found chiefly in the
Alpine regions of central Europe. It has not been recorded from England and
it is doubtful if it occurs in the United States. I have never collected it, but
have seen species so determined by Peck and Farlow, and I received one col-
lection from Geo. L. Morris, Massachusetts, that I think (with doubt) should
be referred here. These specimens were all small, black and unsatisfactory.7
In drying the plant is apt to turn black, in which character it differs from Poly-
porus confluens which when fresh and growing singly may be confused with it.8
Particularly as Polyporus ovinus when old often takes a "scorched" appearance
somewhat similar in color to that of confluens. The plants can be readily told
apart in the colors they assume in drying, blackish in ovinus, red in confluens.

6 In pidgin Latin according to the rules, and hence in the eyes of the law it has no existence.

7 At Kew there are two American specimens determined as ovinus by Berkeley : both I think
wrong. The one from Lea, Cincinnati, is quite different in its quite distinct spores, is unknown to me

8 There are American specimens of Polyporus confluens determined as ovinus in several mu-
seums of Europe, and some of Trog's Swiss distribution were so misdetermined.

76

Fig. 497
Polyporus ovinus.

The two following are I think color forms of one and the same species, and yet they appear to
distinct ivhenfresh. They have the same very peculiar spores see fig. 498) and the dried speci-
s take very much the same dark color, so that they can not be distinguished when dry.

Fig 498

POLYPORUS LEUCOMELAS. — Pileus
fleshy, dark, fuliginous with a dull, slightly silky
surface. Stipe usually mesopodial, concolorous
with the pileus. Flesh white. Pores irregular,
white or light grayish, contrasting ivith the dark
pileus and stem.' Spores (fig. 498) peculiar
globose, elliptical, tubercular, white.

This is a rare plant in Europe and I have never
seen fresh specimens but once, at a fungus show in
Paris. It has been finely illustrated by Gillet, also
very well by Fries (Icones t. 1/9). The contrast of
color between the pileus and pores is the only dif-
ference between it and the next if that can be held
to be a difference. This form is not known from
the United States.

77

Fig. 499 <X 6<

squamosus a hundred and fifty

POLYPORUS GRISEUS (Fig. 500).
— Pileus fleshy, irregular, repand, color
pale smoky gray. Surface dull, minutely
silky. Stipe short, solid, usually thick and
obese. Flesh soft, spongy, grayish white.
Pores small. (Fig. 499 X6) irregular,
round with thick walls, grayish, almost
concolorous with the pileus. Spores round-
ish-elliptical, tubercular, 6-8 mic., white,
the same as the peculiar spores of the pre-
ceding plant.9

Polyporus griseus is a rather frequent plant
in the eastern United States, and a rare one
in Europe. In the United States the plant
was discovered to be a new species and named
Polyporus griseus by Peck. In Europe it is
stated that Linnaeus named it Boletus sub-
years ago. While T have little doubt of the

Fig. 500
Polyporus griseus.

9 The fact that these two plants have the same peculiar spores, and that these peculiar spores
are not known in any other species of Polyporus, would indicate they are the same species. A few
Polyporoids have echinulate, globose spores, but these are the only two to my knowledge with
tubercular spores.

identity of the American and European plants, I think no one knows what
Linnaeus so named so many years ago and few know it in the sense of Fries '»
An excellent illustration has recently been given of the plant by Boudier under
the name Polyporus leucomelas.11

POLYPORUS CAERULIPORUS.-Pileus fleshy, broadly con-
vex, and when in its prime it is bright, violaceous or 'blue, losing the
bright color and becoming brownish when old. Stipe central, con-
colorous. Pores short, angular, bright, bluish color when fresh.
Spores subglobose, 4^2-5, hyaline, smooth.

This is a most striking species, bright colored as any Cortinarius when in its
prime. Unfortunately it is as rare12 as it is beautiful in the United States and
is unknown in Europe. Peck found and named it thirty years ago. Recently
Atkinson found it in North Carolina and as it was "new" (to him) he also named
it. When one does not know about such striking and marked species as Polyporus
caeruliporus it is a very easy matter to discover "new species."

POLYPORUS POLITUS.— A description of the plant is given in Fries
Hymenomycetes, page 525, and it is figured in his Icones, t. 179. It is a very
rare plant in Europe, only known from Fries' record and but one specimen at
Kew which was sent to Berkeley by Fries.13 It is a peculiar reddish color and
the specimen seems to this day to bear out the color as shown in the Icones.
The spores as I find them are globose, 3-4 mic., hyaline, smooth. It grew in
frondose woods. Polyporus pachypus which was referred here by Fries as a
synonym, is according to specimens in Persoon's herbarium quite another thing.
Should it develop that Polyporus politus was only regular mesopodial specimens
of Polyporus confluens I would not be surprised.

The three following species are unknown to me :

Polyporus •violaceo-maculatus. — Described from China as brownish gray, thin with white flesh.
Pores white, spotting brown-violaceous at the touch, small, decurrent. Spores ovoid, 6 x 8-10, hyaline,
smooth.

Polyporus decurrens from California, said to have a rough, " tuberculose," brown surface, thin,
white flesh, small, decurrent, white pores and to be " only known from the type locality," which means
that no one else has " discovered " it except the wonderful discoverer.

Polyporus myclodes, as published in Grevillea and found in Saccardo is said to be a typograph-
ical mistake for myelodes. No specimen exists at Kew, and Kalchbrenner who named it was not a
very certain authority. Described as being infundibuliform, yellowish with thin, white flesh. Pores
small, white. It came from Australia.

GROUP 3. STIPE CENTRAL. PORES LARGE.

Polyporus tuberaster, which would otherwise have belonged in this section,
we have placed in the first section, on account of having a (false) sclerotium.
It would probably be better to place it here.

GROUP 4. STEMS USUALLY EXCENTRIC OR IRREGULAR.
PORES SMALL.

We have placed in this group two plants that were placed by Fries in the

10 Fries gives a poor picture of it, I think (Sv. All. t. 53), and the present mycologists in Sweden
do not find it tt all. I think they do find it (rarely , but call it Polyporus leucomelas.

11 Our figure 498 of the peculiar spores has been taken from this plate. Copied through the
kindness of Miss Wakefield at Kew.

121 have never seen it tresh and have received dried specimens from only four correspondents,
viz : H. C. Beardslee, North Carolina ; John Dearness, Canada ; J. Vroom. New Brunswick and G
Hay, New Brunswick. It loses all blue color in drying and turns brown.

13 Fries k«pt none in his own collection.

79

section Merismus. The latter section embraces plants that bear numerous pilei
proceeding from the branches of a common stem. In the two species in question
(cristatus and confluens) each pileus is borne on its distinct stem, and while
they sometimes grow caespitose and the stems grow more or less confluent
we look upon this as the cohesion of separate stems and not as the division of
a common stem. In addition we find specimens growing singly with a normal,
single stem much more frequently than those that grow together and coalesce.
Usually the stem is more or less lateral or irregular, but not truly merismatoid.

F|g. 501
Polyporus cristatus.

POIvYPORUS CRISTATUS (Fig. 501).— Pileus drying dingy or
greenish yellow color, with a rough, somewhat scabrous, usually

80

rimose surface. Stipes sometimes mesopodial but usually excentric
or even lateral. Often the plants grow in clusters with deformed
stems. Flesh, thin, brittle, yellow. Pores at first are small and
round, becoming larger and more angular and torn when old. Long,
decurrent on the stem. Spores are subglobose, smooth, hyaline, ^-6
mic. with a small, lateral apiculus.

This is by no means a rare plant in the United States, where it has generally
been known under a name given to it by Berkeley, viz: Polyporus flavo-virens
I have long suspected it to be the same as the European plant but could not
convince myself from the scanty specimens I found in the museums of the
European plant. I got my first clear idea of the European plant from abundant
collections I found at Berlin, made by Dr. Hennings. I then felt quite sure
and sent material to Bresadola, who confirmed my view. In some respects this
is unfortunate for flavo-virens was a most excellent name for the plant and
we dislike to give it up in favor of a poor name such as cristatus. Schweinitz
many years ago recorded cristatus from the United States, and while no speci-
men exists in his herbarium he undoubtedly had it right. In Europe Polyporus
cristatus seems to be a rather rare species, but it is recorded from most countries
of Europe. I rarely receive it from correspondents in Europe and it is poorly
represented in most of their museums. It has there the reputation of growing
in beech woods. It has been illustrated in several of the old works (Barla,
Krombholz, Rostkovius) but none of them are very good. The latter gives a
fair idea of its color but a very poor one of its usual form. Our photograph
(Fig. 501) was made by Professor Beardslee.

Form. — I made one collection at Trexlertown, Pennsylvania, of what when
fresh was the usual form and color of Polyporus cristatus, but in drying the
pores turned brick red. Therefore the dried specimens seem different from the
ordinary plant. I think this form has no name unless it is the plant that has
been described as a new species, Polyporus Whiteae, which is unknown to me.

POLYPORUS CONFLUENS.— Pileus reddish, leather or ochre15
color, sometimes growing singly but often several in a cluster which
are very irregular and confluent.16 Flesh, white, firm, not changing
when cut. Stipe short, usually more or less excentric and irregular,
often more or less confluent but not merismatoid. Pores short, white
or pale, minute, decurrent. Spores subglobose, 3-3^ mic.. hyaline,
smooth.

This is rather a frequent plant in the pine woods of Sweden. I think it
is not recorded in England but is not rare on the continent. Also in America
it occurs in the northern and New England States. Often it grows caespitose
and then more or less irregular and confluent, but not merismatoid as generally
classed. Often I have found it in Sweden, growing singly and then it is some-
times liable to be confused with scorched specimens of Polyporus ovinus. Poly-
porus confluens is one of the few plants that can be recognized when dry more
easily than when fresh for it turns red in drying and the older it gets the redder
it becomes. A number of the old (always red) specimens are in the museums
and in several instances are misnamed, Polyporus ovinus. As it is considered
edible it has been illustrated a number of times. One of the best figures is
that issued in Romell's wall atlas of the edible fungi of Sweden.

15 Fries states that it varies from flesh to ochre but never orange.

16 The best illustration showing its usual method of growth is Barla t. 29. The old figure of
Schaeffer is quite misleading.

81

POLYPORUS DISCOIDEUS (Fig. 503).— Pileus thick, fleshy,
with a smooth brown cuticle. Stipe excentric (or sub-lateral) short,
thick. Pores probably white when fresh, discolored in the dried speci-
mens, minute, round. Spores not found by me.

Fig. 503

Polyporus discoideus (small specimens).

This is a tropical American species, originally from Cuba. Recently speci-
mens have been sent me by Rev. Rick, Brazil, from which our figure (503)
has been made. The original specimen from Cuba was larger, about four inches
in diameter. It grows on logs as I understand it, hence has been placed in the
section Lentus. It is so much more obese and fleshy than the true Lentus that I
think it is better placed in Ovinus.

POLYPORUS POPANOIDES.— Pileus uniformly pale, isabelline
color.17 Flesh rather soft. No distinct cuticle, but the surface seems
harder than the flesh. Stipe short, thick, excentric, inserted very near
one side. Pores minute, concolorous, about 5 mm. deep. Spores sub-
globose, 3/^2-4, hyaline, smooth.

This is known from one collection at Kew made in Mauritius, but the col-
lector's name is not given. It is about ten inches in diameter, an inch thick and
has a short, thick stem near one side.

POLYPORUS LUTEOLUTEUS.— This was named by Professor McGinty
from the United States, and probably belongs to this section but is unknown
to me.

17 It was described as " whitish " and it may ha
82

:hanged.

GROUP 5. STIPE EXCENTRIC. PORES LARGE.

POLYPORUS PES-CAPRAE (Fig. 5o4).-Pileus fleshy, red-
dish-brown, covered with squamose hairs. Flesh white. Stipe ex-
centric or sub-lateral, short, white, yellowish at the base. Pores large
angular, shallow, white, turning greenish when bruised. Spores ovoid'
pinform, 8x 12 mic., hyaline, smooth, tapering to an apiculate base.

Fig, 504
Polyporus Pes-caprae.

This is a rare species in the Alpine regions of Europe, but is said to be
common and used as food in Italy and certain parts of France. It is unknown
from northern Europe and England, and is not recorded from the United States.
I have always thought that Polyporus retipes as named from our Southern
States by Underwood was a good species, but when in writing this article I
began to consider the characters which would distinguish it from Pes-caprae, I
did not find any. It has the same general habits, surface, pores, stem insertion
and spores ( !), and I now believe is the same plant. The large specimen in our
Fig. 504 is a co-type specimen. It is a very rare plant in the United States,
only known from a few collections from Alabama and a recent collection (the
small plants of Fig. 504) from Mrs. Hannah Streeter, collected at Laurel Springs,
New Jersey, near Philadelphia. Our description has been drawn from European
plants and records, our figures from American specimens.

83

POLYPORUS ELLISII .— Pileus when fresh sulphur-yellow with
large, dense, fasciculate warts. Flesh white, when dry discolored.
Pores when young white, angular, decurrent becoming sinuate and
somewhat irpicoid when old. Color when fresh is white, changing
to greenish when wounded. In the dried plant they are darker than
the pileus. Spores (teste Underwood) oval, 6x9, smooth.

This is one of the rarest of American species. I think it is known from
but three collections, made many years ago, viz : Ellis in New Jersey, Ravenel
in South Carolina, and Underwood in Alabama. An illustration was given in
our Polyporoid Series, page 29.

POLYPORUS SQUAMATUS (Fig. 505).— Pileus mesopodial, fleshy, cov-
ered with large cone-like scales. Pores large, angular. Color of the dried plant
dark, almost black, excepting the pores, which take a red color similar to that

Fig. 605
I'olyporus squamatus.

of Polyporus, confluens when dry. Plant is imperfectly known from a collection
made in Hungary by Kalchbrenner and determined as Polyporus ovinus. Si — '

mens are at Berlin.

Compare Polyporus Boucheanus, page 85, nex
black stipe, is so placed in the pamphlet on account of i

>peci-

/hich, although it does not have a
elationship to Polyporus squamosus.

MELANOPUS.

The species with black stipes were separated by Fries into a distinct section
which he called Pleuropus. If confined to the plants of Europe, it is not a
bad section as they can all be referred as forms of two species, viz : squamosus
and varius. In foreign countries however it would include such species as
Polyporus radicatus of the United States and tumulosus of Australia and others
that have little relation to these plants of Europe and which we feel are much
better classed in the section Ovinus. We would therefore divide the species that
Fries separated as Pleuropus between the sections Ovinus and Lentus of Fries.

84

GROUP 6. MELANOPUS. PORES LARGE. STIPE BLACK,
AT THE BASE AT LEAST.

POLYPORUS SQUAMOSUS.— Pileus thick, tkshy. with soft,
white flesh. Surface with large, appressed darker scales. Pores at first
shallow- and mere reticulations18 elongated in diameter, becoming longer
and irregular with age, white, soft. Stipe excentric or sub-lateral
(rarely central) short, thick, black at the base. Spores oblong, 5-6 x
12-15 mic., hyaline, smooth.

In Europe this is a most abundant species on frondose wood, particularly
the ash tree and other cultivated shade trees. It sometimes attains a very large
size and is said to do a great deal of damage in the parks and yards, producing
rapid decay in the affected trees. It is curious however (and perhaps fortunate)
that in the United States it is quite a rare species. I have observed it there
but a few times.

Forms. — The specimens vary much in size but are fairly constant in the lead-
ing characters. I have collected very thin forms in the United States with central
stems. Sometimes abortive, monstrous forms occur in caves or hollow trees and
these may be confused with similar monstrosities of Lentinus lepideus.

Polyporus pallidus was based on a drawing sent Fries from Hungary. The
drawing seems to represent only a small scaled form of Polyporus squamosus.
A smooth plant has been so referred and recorded by Professor Peck. The same
plant by Berkeley was referred to Polyporus Rostkowii. I think they are both
correct and both are better classed as scaleless forms of Polyporus squamosus.
As to flesh, texture, color and spores they seem to be the same as the ordinary
form.

POLYPORUS LENTINOIDES.— This is a Brazilian plant that Dr. Hen-
nings so named as a variety of Polyporus squamosus. It is very close to this
species but is smooth and the context is firmer. I would place more stress on
the difference in context texture than on the surface difference. I have received
the same plant from Brazil from Father Rick.

Fig. 506
Polyporus Boucheanus.

first

large

I have never observed this pon

are this species, young, with such large, shallow pores.

85

POLYPORUS BOUCHEANUS (Fig. 506). — Pileus fleshy,
plane or cyathiform, yellowish with small squamae. Pores large, an-
gular, decurrent, white. Stipe short, pale, hirsute, excentric or often
lateral. Pores 7x12, hyaline, smooth.

This is a rare species in Europe and it appears to me to have been badly
confused. The only type (Fig. 506, the long stemmed one) is at Berlin. It
was called Favolus Boucheanus and it appears in Saccardo under Favolus. It
was described by Klotzsch as having a dark stem and was put in Melanopus by
Fries. Polyporus Forquignoni as called by Quelet is the same plant I think
although said to have a stem "white as. snow." I think the truth is the stem is
neither white nor black, but concolorous-, hence does not come in this section,
but I place it here as I think it is so closely related to squamosus. In fact, ex-
cept as to its small size and pale stem, it is squamosus as to color, flesh, pores,
texture and spores. In England and the United States Polyporus Boucheanus
has been confused with Favolus europaeus with which it has no relation and to
which it has but little resemblance.

Flo 507

Polyporus tasmanicus.

POLYPORUS TUMULOSUS.— This is known from but one col-
lection made in Australia and preserved at Kew. It is quite a dis-
tinct thing with a pileus resembling in some respects that of Polyporus
betulinus. It has soft, white, flesh and a thin, papery, smooth cuticle.
The stems are short, thick and mesopodal. They are so covered with
adhering dirt that it can not be told whether or not they belong in the
section with black stems. The pores are large, irregular and apparently
have turned black in drying. Spores not found by me.

86

"On the hard, stony ridges about Brisbane, when trenching the land, large
masses of mycelium are often met with. Some of the masses would weigh over
a hundred weight. From its consistency one might fancy that a quantity of dough
had been buried. My idea has always been that it was the mycelium of some
Boletus." — Quotation (from Bailey?).

Cooke named this plant tumulosus under the impression that it produced
these mycelial masses. I can not see any direct connection between this fungus
in the account as published and these mycelial masses, and I think it is not
certain that there is any connection.

POLYPORUS TASMANICUS (Fig. 507).— Pileus fleshy, tur-
binate, with a brown, smooth surface. Flesh soft, white, thick. Pores
large, angular, white, decurrent, about 5 mm. deep. Stipe short, thick,
black. Spores 4-5 x 12-14, oblong, hyaline, smooth.

This is based on a specimen and what appears to be an excellent drawing
(Fig. 507) made by Rodway in Tasmania. It is preserved at Kew and is known
from but this single collection.

Polyporus novo-guineensis, from New Guinea, seems to belong in this section but little can be
told about it from the type material. Compare the note on page 90.

GROUP 7. MELANOPUS. STIPE BLACK AT BASE.
PORES SMALL.

POLYPORUS RADICATUS (Fig. 508).— Pileus with a brown,
minutely tomentose even surface. Flesh white, soft. Pores small,
white, round, or elongated. Stem dark, velvety, mesopodal, tapering
to a long, rooting base. Spores oblong, 6-8x12-16 mic., hyaline.
smooth.19

This is a very striking and characteristic American plant, rather rare but
not unusual, at least in the vicinity of Cincinnati.20 I have collected solitary speci-
mens several times and once I found quite a colony. As far as I have seen
it always grows in the earth and has a long, slender, radicating base to the
stem. I do not know, but presume this is attached to buried wood. It seems
to never grow on logs. Schweinitz named this plant years ago and Lea collected
it and sent a long account to Berkeley who correctly referred it. Peck called
it Polyporus Morgani but I think he has since corrected^ it, at least both he
and Morgan admitted years ago that it was but a synonym.21

POLYPORUS HARTMANNL— Pileus with a brown, smooth,
minutely velvety surface. Flesh pale, soft, fragile. Pores minute,
decurrent, black in the dried specimens but according to collector's
notes were white when fresh. Stipe solid, excentric. covered with a
dark brown velvet, bulbose below but tapering to the base. Spores
not found bv me.22

19 They are given by Mr. Murrill as 5x6-8, about one-half their size, but many of his spore
records are inaccurate. I know not whether this is due to copying from inaccurate sources or to
careless w8rk. No two observers will measure spores exactly the same, and the most careful will
vary from one to two microns in their records. They ought, however, to be approximately the same.

20 A specimen collected by Morgan was sent to Berlin and bears this endorsement—" This fungus
is a species of Boletus probably new but from dried specimens not determinate . Also spores are
Boletus, pale yellowish, 5-« x 10-12 mic." All of which goes to show that sometimes eminent author-
ities are in error.

21 Mr Murrill adds two other alleged synonyms (chronologically arranged^ one of which ( Kan-
sensis) is most probably wrong, and the other ( hispidellus) is most assuredly wrong, for it has not the
slightest resemblance or relation to Polyporus radicatus.

22Teste Cooke— " minute, elliptic, white."

87

Fig. 508.

Polyporus radicatus reduced about one-fourth). Pore details natural size.

This species is represented by two collections at Kew, one from Toowoomba
the other from Brisbane, Australia. It was illustrated in Cooke's Handbook
but the color I judge from the specimen is too bright. The plant is I think more
brown than red. .

SYNONYMS, NOTES, AND REJECTED SPECIES.

We follow the usual custom in this section of citing the authors of these
"new species," and we wish them much pleasure in the advertisement.

alpinus, Europe, Sauter. Unknown to me. From the description seems to
be Rostkowii or rather scaleless squamosus.

asperellus, Europe, Leveille. Probably based on a crude attempt to draw
Pes-caprae.

bulbipes, Europe, Beck. Known only from the illustration and probably the
same as Boucheanus. Spores seem a little different but that is all.

cadaverinus, Europe, Schulzer. Something abnormal. The type drawing
(Kalchbrenner, t. 35) is found in Fries' collection at Upsala.

Campbelli, India, Berkeley. Known only from a thin section. Probably
could not be determined on comparison.

caudicinus. A cheap juggle of Polyporus squamosus. It originated in
Europe, but has been copied in the United States.

Clusianus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Unknown except from the crude work of
Britzelmayr. Seems to be compared to squamosus.

decurrens, United States. Underwood. See page 79.

Earlei, United States, Underwood=griseus. I have a co-type in my collection.

flavo-squamosus, United States, Undcrwood=Polyporus Ellisii, and is a much
better" name for the plant.

flavovirens, United States, Berkeley. The plant is fairly frequent in the
United States and has been generally known under this: name which is an ex-
cellent name for it. I am sure now that it is unfortunately the same as cristatus
of Europe. Schweinitz had it right and was the only American mvcologist who
did.

Forquignoni, Europe, Quelet. In my opinion the same as Boucheanus.

fuligineus, Europe, Persoon. Neither Persoon nor any one else apparently
has seen the plant and it was only a change of name of Bulliard's Platd 469.
Quelet records the species in his early work but omits it in his final work. Fries
states that he has seen specimens collected in Sweden but none are found in
his herbarium or elsewhere that I have seen. As to shape and color it is sim-
ilar to Polyporus politus and may have been based on small specimens of that
species. The name has no application to it.

hispidellus, United States, Peck. Given with a doubtful mark by Murrill
as a synonym for Polyporus radicatus. 1 suppose the doubtful mark indicates
a guess. K so, it was a bad guess for it lias no resemblance or relation to
Polyporus radicatus. Nor do I sec any occasion for guessing as he examined
Peck's herbarium where good material is preserved and had he known Polyporus
radicatus would have known that it had no resemblance whatever to hispidellus.

holocyaneus, United States, Atkinson. I have not seen this, but it is surely
the same as caeruliporus, the most striking and noteworthy mesopodial Polyporus
that we have in the United States. If the author of this "new species" (new
to him apparently though well known to every one else) ever heard of Peck's
remarkable species he was surely remiss in not mentioning the fact when he re-
described the same thing.

89

Kansensis, United States, Ellis. I have seen no material but it is referred
as a synonym for Polyporus radicatus by Murrill. I am inclined to doubt the
reference, as it grew on logs and and I think radicatus never grows on logs. If
the spore measurements given by Ellis are correct, "5 x 6-8," it is surely not
a synonym for radicatus for the spores are only about half the size of those
of radicatus. This is probably the source from which Murrill got his erroneous
spore record of radicatus.

laeticolor, United States, Murrill. Name being preoccupied has been changed
to Polyporus luteoluteus by Professor McGinty. Name from lutum, mud, and
luteus, yellow, that being the color of the fresh plant as described.

Michelii, Europe, Fries, was based on an old, crude figure of Micheli (T. 61,
f. 2) which tells nothing whatever except that it had large pores and was said
to be white. As no one has met any such plant since the days of Micheli, one
hundred and fifty years ago, we might as well forget it.

Morganii, United States, Peck. Well known for years to have been based
on a small specimen of Polyporus radicatus and both Morgan and Peck have so
admitted to me.

myclodes, Australia, Kalchbrenner. See page 79.

nodipes, India, Berkeley. No type exists.

Novo-guineensis, New Guinea, Hennings. Although it bears Hennings' ad-
vertisement, the only specimen I have found is at Kew. It was evidently a
fleshy, mesopodial plant which has turned black in drying. It might be recog-
nized on comparison, but I think little can be told of the characters of the fresh
plant from this material. See page 87.

olivaceo-fuscus, Ceylon, Berkeley. Known from two thin sections of a small
immature specimen, from which nothing can be told excepting the collector's
notes — "whole plant dull olive-brown." It is most probably a young Boletus.

pallidus, Europe, Schulzer. The type drawing found in Fries' collection is
surely only a small, scaled form of Polyporus squamosus. Professor Peck's
determinations are rather Rostkowii, the scaleless form of the same species.
See page 85.

persicinus, United States, Berkeley. This plant has no relation to the sec-
tion Ovinus. Mr. Murrill however puts it in this section and tells a most
amusing romance about it. He provided for it a "stem, central, thick, conical,
dark-purple, 5 cm. long, 4-8 cm. thick." He might just as well and with as much
truth have provided it with a cloven hoof and a forked tail. The plant is sessile
and grew flat on the side of a tree and has no stem of any kind.

poripes, United States, Fries. No type exists and no plant known to me
in the United States that corresponds to the description. Fries got it from
Curtis and cites Curtis' number 552. It may be found in the Curtis herbarium
at Cambridge. There is nothing at Upsala and at Kew I have not noted this
number. Berkeley endorsed on the Curtis manuscript a note opposite this number
"very near Polyporus pes-caprae," but did not publish it in the synopsis in
Grevillea. Ravenel distributed cristatus as "poripes, Fr." but the determination
is without value. The same can be said of Murrill's guess that it is a prior name
for flavo-virens.

punctiporus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Not worth the trouble to look it up,
as nothing whatever can be told from Britzelmayr's cartoons.

90

retipes, United States, Underwood, same as pes-caprae of Europe.

Rostkowii, Europe, Fries. See page 85.

Schweinfurthianus, Africa, Hennings, was based on a Boletus.

scobinaceus, name used as a juggle for tuberaster.

subradicatus, United States, Murrill. I have seen no specimens but it i-;
distinguished in the key character by having "irregular tubes" which "in radu-atu-;
are regular and entire." As the tubes in radicatus are neither regular nor entire
(cfr. Fig. 508) the distinction does not seem to me to be very good.

subsquamosus, Europe. Attributed to Linnaeus, but I do not believe that
any one has ever known what Linnaeus so called and very few know the
plant in the sense of Fries. In my opinion it is the same plant as griseus of the
United States, which is so much better and so much more certain that I have-
used it.

tessulatus, Europe, Fries. Based on an old crude figure of Micheli's nearly
two hundred years ago, not found since and probably imaginary in the start.

violaceo-maculatus, China, Patouillard. See page 79.

virellus, Europe, Fries. Based on Italian figures which appear to me to be
regular specimens of cristatus as named by the author. Specimens distributed
by Sydow as virellus (No. 2512) are surely cristatus.

viscosus, Europe, Persoon, is not a Polvporus but a Boletus. The type is in
Persoon's herbarium, also what seems to be the same collection at Kew.

Whiteae, United States, Murrill. See page 81.

xoilopus, Europe, Rostkovius. Only known from the original figure, which
seems to me to be a young Boletus.

ADDITIONAL NOTES.

Previous portions of this pamphlet were written at Kew, April, 1911. When
I reached home (October, 1911) I found it in type. Very little has been added
to my knowledge of this Section Ovinus.

During the past summer I visited Rev. Bresadola, in the Dolomite Moun-
tains, of Tyrol. Rev. Bresadola I believe to have the best knowledge of Poly-
poroids in general of any one, but nothing developed in my conversations with
him to require any change from what I had previously written on the subject.
The following are a few additional notes that have come up since the previous
work was written.

POLYPORUS CRISTATUS.— Rev. Bresadola tells me that he sometimes
collects this species in Tyrol, not growing in beech woods as I suppose it occurs
in Europe, but in acerous woods.

POLYPORUS CONFLUENS.— I found this plant in the Tyrol Mountains.
There it is smaller, more confluent, and very little stem developed, and the
entire plant is much more abortive than it is in Sweden. This may be due,
however, to the season, as it was a very dry summer. I have never seen it in
Sweden excepting with well developed stems.

POLYPORUS HARTMANNI.— A specimen has since been received from
Miss Margaret Flockton, Australia. The spores are elongated, 5 x 12 mic.,
hyaline, smooth.

POLYPORUS MYLITTAE.— Since the article was written I have found a
photograph of Polyporus Mylittae that was sent by Cooke to the British
Museum. It shows the abortive fructifications growing from the tuber. I have
never found a specimen of Polyporus Mylittae at Kew or its photograph, although
it is possible that they are preserved in the Economic Museum, where I did
not search for them.

POLYPORUS TUBERASTER.— As I have stated in the body of the
pamphlet, Polyporus tuberaster is said to be cultivated in Italy. The references
in literature that I have examined are mostly so old that I wrote to Prof.
Mattirolo, asking him if it was now produced. He has kindly replied in detail,
giving me the literature on the subject and the following note. The bibliography
was mostly quite ancient, the latest being dated about fifty years ago, so that
1 do not reproduce it. The following, however, is the information Prof.
Mattirolo gives me on the subject in regard to the use of the plant at the present
time :

"As to Pietri or Polyporus tuberaster, plants are collected to this day in
the Campania, and I have an example obtained from the market in the vicinity
of Camerino. I have myself cultivated the sclerotia and obtained and eaten
some excellent Polyporus at Turin. Previously the sclerotia were in cultivation
much more frequent and were sold in the markets and villages of Southern Italy.
In Naples they are preserved in caves to obtain the edible Polyporus. The
sclerotia have gradually diminished in recent years, due to the clearing of the
forests."

92

Professor Mattirolo favored me with a photograph of the plant growing
from a sclerotium, which I reproduce herewith (Fig. 509).

Fig. 509

1'olyporus tuberaster.
Photograph from Professor Mattirolo.

93

INDEX, DISTRIBUTION AND ADVERTISEMENTS.

The following is an index of the species considered valid in this publication,

the countries from whence known, and the personal name to be added to the
specific name by those who believe in this system of advertisement :

Boucheanus, Europe, Klotzsch 86

Caeruliporus, United States, Peck 79

Confluens, Europe and United States, Persoon 81

Cristatus, Europe and United States, Persoon 80

Discoideus, Tropical America, Berkeley 82

Ellisii, United States, Cooke 84

Goetzii, Brazil, Hennings ' 74

Griseus, United States and Europe, Peck 78

Hartmanni, Australia, Cooke 87

Lentinoides, Brazil, Hennings 85

Leucomelas, Europe, Persoon 77

Luteoluteus, United States, McGinty 82

Mylittae, Australia, Cooke 76

Ovinus, Europe, Fries 76

Pes-Caprae, Europe and United States, Persoon 83

Politus, Europe, Fries 79

Popanoides, Mauritius, Cooke 82

Radicatus, United States, Schweinitz 87

Sapurema, Brazil, Moeller 75

Squamatus, Europe, Kalchbrenner 84

Squamosus, Europe and United States, Hudson 85

Tasmanicus, Tasmania, Massee 87

Tuberaster, Europe, Persoon 74

Tumulosus, Australia, Cooke 86

94

SYNOPSIS

OF THE

STIPITATE
POLYPOROIDS

By

C. G. LLOYD.

CINCINNATI, OHIO, . MARCH, 1912.
TY OF CALIFORNIA

JAN 2 01942
I R R A R Y

REV. G. BRESADOLA.

Who has in my opinion, the best critical knowledge of foreign Polyporoids
and to whom I am indebted for many determinations and advice, I beg to dedicate
this pamphlet in appreciation of the many kindnesses received from him. — C. G.
LLOYD.

THE STIPITATE POLYPOROIDS.

The subject of the polyporoids is quite extensive, embracing as
it does about three thousand alleged species. We have been engaged
in the study now two or three years, but except in a general way have
not been able to cover the entire field. We would divide them roughly
into about five divisions as follows :

1st, The stipitate species, embraced in this pamphlet.

2d, The genus Femes.

3d, The genus Polyporus, sessile section.

4th, The genus Polystictus, sessile section.

5th, The allied genera such as Favolus, Laschia, etc.

During the past two or three seasons we have visited all the museums of
Europe and America where most of the historical material is preserved, and
have made our studies, notes, and photographs of the type specimens. This
embraces the museum at Kew, the British Museum at London, the museums
of cryptogamic botany at Paris, Leiden, Berlin, and Upsala. We have looked
over a small collection at Copenhagen, and some of the specimens in the private
collection of Professor Patouillard at Paris. We did not have time to thoroughly
work over Patouillard's species while in Paris, hence a number of his species
are unknown to us. In America in our own collection we have more American
specimens than there are in all the other museums combined. We have thor-
oughly studied the collection of Professor Peck and the specimens of Schweinitz
at Philadelphia. The New York specimens we have not seen, as on both of our
visits to New York Mr. Murrill was absent and we did not wish to work with
his material in his absence.

Our final work on this pamphlet was done at Kew, during February, March,
and April, 1911. There is no other institution in the world where one can
work to such advantage as at Kew, where there is not only the largest col-
lection of historical specimens, but the most perfect library, and where the
conveniences are best.

The conclusions recorded in this pamphlet are our own, made on examina-
tion and study of authentic material. We have not indulged in the too common
practice of passing on species we never saw. We may be mistaken in some
of our opinions, but we. have perpetrated no fraud. When we record a species
as unknown, this means of course that it is unknown to us. In a few instances
where we have not seen specimens we have adopted the opinion of the Rev.
Bresadola, but in each such case this is distinctly stated.

The first and we think the best division of the pore species was
made by Fries (1851) in his Novae Symbolae. At that time but rel-
atively few plants were known, but Fries' divisions were based in the
main on the most prominent characters, and of the eleven sections
into which we have divided the stipitate species, nine of them have been
taken mostly in their original signification from Fries' work. Pro-
fessor Patouillard has outlined a plan of division which we think on
the whole is not as good as that of Fries, but it embraced a few new
ideas and two of them, the sections Ganodermus and Amaurodermus
\ve have adopted.

i 95

In addition there has been no lack of men who have amused
themselves by inventing new names for the sections of polypores.
In the start we have Karsten who was the first to engage in such work.
He discovered that most of Fries' sections were "new genera" and gave
them names. The work had so little merit and had evidently so
little originality as a whole that although proposed thirty years ago,
no one except the author has followed it since, and it figures, when it
has figured at all, chiefly in synonymy.

Monsieur Quelet, a leading French mycologist, learned the greater
part of what he knew from Fries and his works, and in his first
publication could not find words to express his appreciation of the
"grand mycologue d'Upsala." After he had gotten a little insight
into the subject he passed the latter part of his life juggling the names
of his great master, and he did it so thoroughly that very few of his
colleagues, even in France, have ever been disposed to use his work.
This is unfortunate, for Quelet was a field mycologist and knew well
the species that occur in France. As far as I have been able to decide
there was no system or logic to his juggling, his only object apparently
being to propose names in place of Fries' names.

Schroeter would divide the Polyporus species into three genera
on the color of the spores and context, which while answering very
well for the few species that he knew, if generally applied would
bring the bulk of them, about a thousand, into one genus.

The last man to engage in this line of name changing is Mr.
Murrill, who has no more trouble discovering "new genera" and con-
cocting new names than if there had not been three men doing
exactly the same thing with the same plants before him. I question if
there is an institution or mycologist in Europe that attaches any im-
portance or pays any attention to this kind of work, and very few in
America. In my opinion such work is of little value or avail.

The principal work that these men do is to get up new "generic"
names on various pretexts, and of course one can make a "genus"
out of every species if he wants to. Their chief work, however, is to
take the old sections of Fries' genera and then juggle up excuses to
give them new names usually under the cover of some "rule." Such
work, in my opinion, has so little to commend it that I do not consider
it worth citing in detail even as synonyms.

When Fries proposed the divisions of the subject he knew but very
few species, but in the years that have followed "new species" have
been published in quantities, chiefly by Berkeley, who proposed so
many of them that no one has been able to do much with them since.
He was not, however, the only one to name foreign species, although
he named a large part of them. Twenty-five per cent of the species
considered good in this pamphlet were named by Berkeley.

In the early days Klotzsch and Junghuhn named quite a number.
Then came Fries, Montagne, and Berkeley. Then Leveille and Cooke,
and Kalchbrenner. In the latter years we have Hennings, Patouillard,
and Murrill. It would be more accurate to state that they named
collections, for I do not think that any of them knew much about

96

what the others had done, and it has been very much of a haphazard
proceeding from the beginning.

Junghuhn and Montagne, I think, did the best work, or rather
the specimens they left are the best. Fries' foreign specimens have
largely disappeared and many of them will never be known. Kalch-
brenner did the worst work of anybody and renamed as "new species"
the commonest, old, well-known things. He did not seem to have had
the most elementary idea of the subject. Leveille's work was in the
main very poor, and Murrill's recent work is almost as bad. Berkeley,
Hennings, and Patouillard have named as new a large part of the
collections that come into their hands. Naturally they got a number
that are good, and many that I think are not. Spegazzini grinds the
"new species" out by the wholesale from South America, but very-
few of his specimens reach Europe, and such as have are largely mis-
named. I think no one knows what he is doing, not even he.

Very little can be told from any "description" that can be drawn
from a Polyporus, and the most of the determinations that are made
from "descriptions" are wrong. The only way to get names for the
plants is to hunt them up in the various museums where they are
preserved, and then it is often not satisfactory. One finds the same
thing named over and over again. Names based on little frustules that
never did give the slightest idea of any character and many other
irregular things that would not be tolerated except in "Science." I
believe Bresadola to be the only man in Europe who has made an
earnest effort to hunt up and learn the characters of the "old species"
of Polyporus in the various museums of Europe to-day. I do not
always agree with him in all the details, but I think no two who
endeavor to learn names for fungi from the fragmentary, indefinite,
and conflicting specimens on which the names have been based will
ever agree in all cases.

Cooke tried to arrange the names according to the Friesian sys-
tem, but owing to the number of species and the hurried manner
in which the work was done, it was very inaccurate and in its details
was most erroneously done. This was not all Cooke's fault. Many
of the "new species" are described in such a way that not only can
nothing be told about their identity, but in many cases from the de-
scription one can not even place them in the section where they belong.
In this pamphlet, when species stated to be unknown (to me) are
placed in sections, I do not claim that such disposition is anything
more than a guess.

Having nothing else to follow, Saccardo adopted Cooke's arrange-
ment, which is quite unfortunate, as Saccardo is used as a basis of
classification in most museums, and by this method species are brought
into the same division that have little j "semblance and often no relation.

In this pamphlet the stipitate species are divided into eleven
sections, or genera if one so desires to call them, but we prefer to^call
them sections. We disclaim having discovered any "new genera" or
anything else new in the classification. Nine of our divisions we have
taken from the work of Fries and two from that of Patouillard.

97

we have succeeded in arranging the species where they belong in these
sections that will be enough "novelty" to satisfy us, for we think it
has not been even approximately done before.

As this pamphlet is proposed simply as an arrangement of the
species, we have given but very brief descriptions, in fact only the
more salient points. We think very few species are ever learned
except from specimens, and that the largest part of the bad Latin that
is used in describing species is purely a waste of good printer's ink
and of no avail whatever as far as identifying the species is concerned.
We have introduced a number of photographs that will be found to
be of more service in this respect than the most minute descriptions
that could be written. We have not given in detail the source of these
illustrations, but we believe them to all be true to name, and the greater
part of them are made from the type specimens.

As to nomenclature we have employed the sectional name as the
first binomial (except in one case where it would produce the bar-
barism called tautology) and these sectional names are all old and
familiar and will not lead to any confusion. If these sectional names
are taken as genera, it is absolutely senseless to record who used the
sectional name first as a generic name for any particular species.
Mycologists are so very busy recording in great detail who did this and
who did that, and who called it this and who called it that, and who
made this combination and who made that combination, that they often
have little time left to consider what was done.

As to specific names, in the body of this work we have not added
personal names to the specific names, believing that in the case of most
of the plants the authors being dead, it would not serve the usual pur-
pose of ministering to self-conceit. We have given them in our syno-
nyms where we think they are quite appropriate. We have given
these names also in our index, according to the wishes of the authors
in most cases, although not all. Some writers are so selfish they wish
to advertise only themselves, others divide the advertisement with a
collector or with a friend. It has been suggested that it wTould be a
gracious thing to give all the advertisement to the collector, and I think
the latter is the best plan, at least I adopt it in this pamphlet where
I am concerned. In several cases in arranging the species it occurs
that sometimes two in the same section have the same specific name.
We have made no change, merely indicating the second by the word
bis and would prefer to leave the work of changing names to others.
We have endeavored to make this pamphlet a practical summary of
what is known (to us) on the subject, and have indicated by the
size of the type the relative value of the species as they appeal to
us. Those printed in the larger type are the leading marked, charac-
teristic species which we believe have merit and value. Those in smaller
type are forms or doubtful species or plants imperfectly known to us.
Where I have not seen and studied a species I usually place it in the
section "unknown" (to me) for I think there is nothing gained by my
guessing a second time concerning what was in many cases largely
an original guess. If I have done any guessing as to the identity of

98

Fig. 395.

those specimens I have not seen, I have plainly so indicated it in each
instance. The eleven sections in which the species are divided being
mostly the old, familiar sections, need little explanation. The two
that are least known are the sections Ganodermus and Amaurodcrmus,
which at our hands have undergone changes of gender in order to be
uniform with the others.

The section Ganodermus was first proposed for the common Poly-
porus lucidus of Europe. There are but few species in temperate
regions, but it is more common in the tropics. The
main characters are usually a strongly laccate sur-
face, colored context, and the real character is a
spore character. The spore (Fig. 395) has a hyaline
membrane or epispore which is large and projects
at the base beyond the colored endospore. This
empty base usually collapses, then the spore beconu-s
truncate at the base. It has been stated that this
is not the base but the apex of the spore, a state-
ment I do not believe.

Amaurodermus is a tropical section. All species have stems,
usually central but also lateral. The surface is generally dull and the
stems velutinate. The spores (Fig. 396)
usually in abundance, are colored, globose
or oblong, large, and the endospore fills
the epispore. The apiculus is rarely promi-
nent. We have included in this section sev-
eral thin species in which we have not
found the spores and which we doubt really
belong to it.

The other sections that we adopt are
the well-known sections of Fries' system
that need no special explanation other than
our key. Some species present characters that would place them in
two sections. In such cases we use our own judgment in placing them
where we think they best belong. The names for the sections are mostly
the same that Fries used. In one case, Perennis, we use another name,
Pelloporus, for reasons we have previously stated, viz., the plants are
not perennial.

OP.

Fig. 396.

KEY TO THE SECTIONS OF STIPITATE POLYPOROIDS.

There are included here only the stipitate species of the old genus Polyporus. The allied genera
as Favolus, Laschia, etc , are not here considered.

Sub-woody.

With woody fibrils but not perennial and not having the pores in strata
(except as to the first).
Pores in areas of growth (indistinctly stratified) Fomes.

Pores Not Stratified.
Spores colored (mostly elliptical) with a strong apiculus. Context

colored. Surface of most species laccate. (Cfr. also p. 99) . . . .Ganodermus.
Spores colored, mostly globose, with none or a small apiculus. Context

colored. Surface of most species dull. (See p. 09) Arnaurodermus.

Spores white. Context (except sec. n) pale or white Lignosus.

Fleshy or Coriaceous.

Stipe lateral (Spores white) Petaloides.

Stipe branching and bearing several pileoli Merismus.

Stipe Central or Excentric (Rarely Lateral).

Flesh spongy, light (Spores white or colored) Spongiosus.

Spores colored. Fleshy or coriaceous Pelloporus.

Spores white. Fleshy, soft, usually terrestrial, with thick pilei Ovinus.

Spores white. Fleshy-pliant, coriaceus, usually thin pilei, and epixy-

lotis Lentus.

Lentus with black stems Melanopus.

SECTION FOMES (STIPITATE.)

Although the first sixty-one species placed in Fomes in Saccardo (Vol. 6)
have stems, I believe there is but one of them that can be so included on the
definition there given and generally accepted for this genus, viz. : "perennis, suc-
cessive strata nova gerens." Many are subligneous in texture, but are annuals
in temperate regions, and in the tropics if they persist more than one season
(which is doubtful) they do not produce successive pore strata. The following
is the only one in which I have noticed the slightest indication of strata.

DIABOLICUS (Fig. 397).— The entire plant (except the pores
and context) is black. Stem mesopodal, with pale, solid context, and
black, smooth, dull crust (i-i/4 x8-io cm.). Pileus (8-14 cm.) black,
even, depressed in the center, with black, smooth, dull surface. Con-
text (5 mm.) pale cinnamon color. Pores minute, at first cinnamon,
but black when old. If not in layers at least in distinct areas of growth.
Colored setae very abundant on the. hymenium. Spores not found,
doubtless white. This is a rigid, black plant, growing on wood in
Brazil. It is known only from Spruce's original collection. In its
context color, setae, and spores (probably) it is related to Fomes
pomaceus, but there is no other similar stipitate species known.

100

I J tl 1 1

Fig 397

Fomes diabolicus.
(Reduced)

SECTION GANODERMUS.

The section Ganodermus is characterized by peculiar spores (see page 99)
and also usually the stipe and pileus are laccate (viz. : covered with a dark,
resinous, shining crust). The context and spores are colored.

2. SPORES SMOOTH OR BUT SLIGHTLY ROUGH.

LUCIDUS. — Stipe and pileus strongly laccate. Context cinna-
mon or fulvous, varying lighter. Pores not stratified. Spores 6x 10,
slightly rough. A strongly marked species of Europe and America
and its forms (?) are found in the tropics. It is difficult to draw the
line as to the tropical forms, although I am disposed to refer to luciclus
all those with the same stem insertion and similar context color. The
stipe is usually pleuropodal, rarely mesopodal, but the pileus is never
in my opinion sessile. The three following I think are but forms of
lucidus.

VALESIACUS.— Only a form with paler context, and not really a form
at that, for lucidus varies much as to context color and is never very dark.
The common American plant that corresponds to this European form has been
called Ganodermus Thugae.

JAPONICUS. — Europeans usually refer the Japanese form to lucidus. In
the Japanese lists it figures as Polyporus Japonicus. I think both are right.
Forms that I have seen from Japan are blacker than the European plant but
are surely the same species.

LAUTERBACHII. — A thin, tropical form of lucidus. It seems thinner
and more rigid, but for me it is only a form.

OTHER FORMS. — Plants received from India I would refer to lucidus as
forms. They are not so strongly laccate, more dull, and often mesopodal.

INCRUSTANS. — We have in the United States a curious form, or perhaps
an abnormality, of lucidus which instead of taking the usual shape with a
lateral stem is often thin, cup-shaped, with an indistinct stem. It has usually
been referred to lucidus, but is quite different in its habits. It grows usually
in grassy places, incrusting the blades of grass.

CURTISII. — Context, spores, and stipe as Polyporus lucidus, but
not strongly laccate and color is yellowish. I have collections which
are pale, almost white. It is a plant of a southern type in the United
States, frequent in the South and extends up the coast to New Jersey
and is rarely found in New England. In the museums of Europe
there are several specimens exactly the same, from Africa.

AMBOINENSIS.— This is based on an old figure by Rumphius.
Many specimens so named are in the museums, but I have seen but one
that resembles the figure. This is a Philippine collection in the British
Museum. The stem attachment is like that of fornicatus, but the stem
is very slender and the plant appears to have grown erect as Rumphius
shows it. The stem is not branched as originally shown, otherwise the
specimen corresponds exactly. This was the first foreign species in
this section to be illustrated. Fries referred to it pictures that appear

SECTION GANODERMUS.

quite different. The many specimens so named in the museums often
have little resemblance to each other, or to the original picture.

COCH LEAR.— Plant with a black, laccate crust. Stipe thick
(about an inch) 6-10 inches long, dorsally attached. Context cin-
namon. Pores minute with white mouths. Spores 8x 14, smooth or
slightly rough. This is a common species in Java and the East Indies,
but we have seen no specimen from any other section. There are a
number of collections at Leiden, and it was sent to us abundantly by
Dr. Konigsberger from Java. We take it in the sense of Bresadola's
determination at Leiden, though we doubt if it is the same as Nees
illustrated, especially as to the stipe. The plant has the same (dorsal)
stem insertion as fornicatus and amboinensis, but much more obese
stem.

AFRICANUS. — Pileus thick, obese, with a mesopodal, obese stem.
Context dark, umber. Surface dull, resinous. Spores 7 x 10, minutely
rough. In its relationship, color of context, and spores this plant is
close to the sessile species such as applanatus and widely departs from
all others in this stipitate section. The type came from South Africa
and was misnamed Polyporus Umbraculum by Kalchbrenner and frag-
ments were so distributed (de Thumen, 708). It seems to have the
same color characters as fulvellus, which is a sessile species, and the
exsiccatae number was cited under that species.

Fig. 398
Ganodermus fornicatus.

Fig. 399.
Ganodermus Lingua.

SECTION GANODERMUS.

FORNICATUS (Fig. 398).— Pileus and stipe with black, laccate
crust. Stipe slender, dorsally-lateral, attached. Context thin, cinna-
mon, fulvous. Pores minute, hard, compact. Mouths at first white
(contrary to description), then purplish brown. Spores 6 x 10, smooth.
No type exists, but it is frequent in Brazil, the "type locality," according
to numerous collections of Spruce (No. 48, 79, 172). It is charac-
terized by the peculiar stipe attachment. In Australia are similar
plants, but the spores are rougher. There is also a similar plant com-
mon in Ceylon (teste Fetch), but I have seen no specimens. Specimens
from New Caledonia determined as amboinensis I take to be the same.

MASTOPORUS.— Stipe thick, lateral, with a smooth laccate
crust. Context thin, cinnamon, scanty. Pores hard, minute, compact,
dark purplish brown. Spores 5x8, smooth. Very similar to forni-
catus as to the peculiar hard pores. Type from Singapore at Paris,
but it comes to me frequently from Africa and is probably common
throughout the East.

FLEXIPES (bis).— Pileus unilateral, attached, small (1-2 cm.)
with a strongly laccate, black crust. Stipe slender, cylindrical, with
a smooth strongly laccate, black crust. Pores small, pale cinnamon.
Spores 5 x 10, smooth. Known from one collection, from China, in
the herbarium of Patouillard. It differs from all others in this group
in its slender stem and habits. It has a general resemblance (except
small pores) to our figure (411) of Polyporus longipes.

LINGUA (Fig. 399). — Pileus small, rarely more than two or three
cm. wide, but deep (2-3 cm.) in proportion to its width. Attached by
a dorsal-lateral, short stem. Surface dark reddish brown, laccate, sul-
cate. Pores long, reaching the crust, small. Context cinnamon. Not
common in the museums, but specimens seen from Java, Sumatra, and
New Guinea. Known from its small size and peculiar shape. Type
has not been seen. We take the species in the sense of Montagne's
determination. It does not exactly correspond to the original illustra-
tion, but we have seen no specimen that does.

BONINENSIS. — Stipe dorsally prolonged. Surface dull, ferruginous or cin-
namon, not laccate. Context dark tabacinus. Spores 6 x 12, smooth. Known
only from the type at Paris from Bonin Island, collected by Wright and dis-
tributed (U. S. Expl. Exp.) as Polyporus lucidus. The corresponding collec-
tion at Kew is a different (laccate) plant.

REGULICOLOR. — Surface dull, reddish brown, not laccate. Stipe lateral,
apparently proceeding from a rhizome or a rooting stem. Known from a single
specimen at Kew stated to be from Cuba, but I think the locality is doubtful.

104

SECTION GANODERMUS.

3- SPORES DISTINCTLY ROUGH.

OCHROLACCATUS (Fig. 400) .-Pileus small but deep, attached
by a short rudimentary, dorsal stem. Crust pale, ochraccns faintlv
laccate rugulose zoned. Pores medium with white mouths, long, not
stratified but reaching the crust, very regular, arranged in lines. Spores
large, 16x32 (!), with small apiculus, distinctly rough A strongly
distinct species, very rare and known only from the Philippines Types
at Pans and at Kew and the British Museum. These collections which
are surely the same species vary some in external appearance The
type at Paris is our figure 400. That at Kew is almost white with a
dull surface. That in the British Museum is sessile and has a pale
smooth, shiny crust as if waxed but not laccate.

Fig. 400
Ganodermus ochrolaccatus (pores enlarged X6).

PLACOPUS. — Pileus with an intense black, shining, laccate sur-
face, becoming dull in old specimens. Stipe lateral, with similar crust.
A small species, thin, an inch or two in diameter. Spores 8x12,
distinctly rough. Only known to me from Bresadola's naming from
Java at Leiden. As I have found no types in any of the museums, I
judge his determination was made from the description only.

EMINI (Fig. 402). — Pileus small, usually pleuropodal, rarely
mesopodal. Stipe long, with black, strongly laccate. smooth crust,
rooting at the base. Spores large with distinct apiculus 20 x 28, rough.
The pileus is not as strongly laccate as the stipe. A marked species
known from abundant types at Berlin from Africa.

HENNINGSII (Fig. 401).— Pileus and stem strongly laccate,
smooth, dark. Pileus 3-4 inches in diameter with a mesopodal, rooting
stem. Pores small, pale. Spores zox 12, rough, subglobose, but dis-
tinctly apiculate. Known from one collection at Berlin from Africa,
made by Stuhlman and confused by Hennings with the preceding.

105

SECTION GANODERMUS.

Fig. 401

Ganodermus Henningsii.

Fig. 402

Ganodermus Emini.

OPACUS. — Pileus 3-4 cm. x 5-10 mm. thick, with a fragile, dull,
brownish crust. Stipe mesopodal with similar crust. Context pale
cinnamon, thin. Pores minute with concolorous mouths, 4 mm. long.
Spores 8-10 oval, with small, hyaline apiculus and are strongly rough.
This is known from two collections at Paris, one from Brazil, the other
from Cuba.

106

SECTION GANODERMUS.

ALLUANDL— Pileus with a smooth, black crust. Stem i cm
thick, 15 cm. long, laterally (dorsally) attached to the pileus, smooth,
black crust. Pores small, round, some large and sinuate, with thin
walls and concolorous mouths, long, reaching the crust. Context scanty,
cinnamon. Spores 10x16-18 with a distinct apiculus and distinctly
rough. Known from a single specimen at Paris (in the cupboard)
from Africa.

UNNAMED. — Pileus with a thin crust, mat, minutely velvety,
with a few darker, slightly metallic zones. Context very 'thin, pale
cinnamon. Pores I cm. long, minute, pale cinnamon with concolorous
mouths. Stipe mesopodal, 24 cm. long, sulcate, with sterile branches,
covered with a smooth, black crust. Spores strongly reticulate (the
only reticulate polyporoid spores known to me) obovate with small,
apiculate base, 12x20, pale colored. Type found by me unnamed,
without label, in a cupboard in the Museum at Paris, the origin un-
known but probably from Africa. I do not name it as I presume they
will wish to do so at Paris.

HILDEBRANDI. — Pileus, context, and stem exactly the same as the small
form (ramosii) of Polyporus rugosus. Spores conidial, ovoid, 4-5x5-7, dis-
tinctly rough. Known from one specimen at Paris. I suspect it is a conidial
form of Polyporus Ramosii.

4. ANOMALOUS SECTION WITH A FALSE STEM.

PISACHAPANI. — This is, I judge, an anomalous species. It is flat,
branched like the fingers of a hand, and the stem is made of discs growing
from each other, as if the plant started to produce a succession of pilei and
then changed its mind and produced a false stem. The surface is smooth,
laccate. Nees named and figured it from Java. I found a single specimen
of this curious growth from Samoa. In my specimen the pores are not per-
fectly formed and I find no spores.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

I doubt if a more cumbersome, inaccurate, or impractical system could be
devised for the naming of plants than the one that has been adopted by "Science"
in the naming of fungi. The European work of Persoon and Fries was based
for the most part on a practical knowledge that they had of the growing plants,
and the greater part of their work was of the highest merit and will always
stand. The only weak part is the species that were founded on old pictures,
often inaccurate and erroneous, and the names were based often on the in-
accuracies of the pictures. For many of them no plant is known that corre-
sponds.

As to foreign (to Europe) species the whole subject has been a haphazard
proceeding from the start. The earlier namers had very scanty material, but they
based a "new species" on almost every collection that they received, and many
of them were evidently but slight varieties or individual forms to which the
same authors would have paid no attention had they seen the forms growing
in their woods. As the years rolled by new "authorities" came into the field
and each one has discovered a large part of the plants he got from foreign
countries to be "new species" and gave them names, although not one of them,
I think (except Bresadola), has made any serious endeavor to learn the names
that others have given to largely the same plants.

107

SECTION GANODERMUS.

The result is a mess of about 3,000 names of Polyporei mostly compiled into
vSaccardo to date, and no one can tell anything whatever as to their identity
from what has been written about them. The only way to learn the names
is to hunt them up in the museums where they are preserved, and when they
are not preserved, and many of them are not, nothing will ever be known about
them. This hunting up process is rather difficult and ordinarily is not possible.

Of the 3,000 "species" of Polyporei that have (mostly) been scraped
up into Saccardo I doubt if one-fourth of them represent anything of value,
and it is more trouble to learn which are of value than the subject is worth.
If I had spent the same time and work on something useful, that I have work-
ing over these old puzzles, I do not doubt that a great deal more good could
have been accomplished. But with me it has been a recreation and a pleasure
that the subject would probably not have yielded had it been exploited in an
intelligent manner, and had anything definite been known about it.

There are about 700 alleged species (names) that are supposed to be stipitate
and considered in this pamphlet. Of these I have seen about 500 authentic
specimens, and of those seen 225 impress me as being good species and
having merit and 58 others have been retained as having some possible
value. The others I have seen to the number of about 215 chiefly reflect I
believe the lack of knowledge or judgment on the part of the authors. In
addition there are 65 stipitate species (dead) carried in our literature of
which no authentic material can be found. Nothing will ever be really known
about any of them, though it is the fashion nowadays for tourists to make
running visits to the various museums and come home and tell just as big
yarns about those that do not exist as they tell about those that do. As long
as they can arrange a lot of Latin names in a row and give the dates, it seems
to be immaterial whether there is any truth in the arrangement or not. There
are 105 alleged species marked in this pamphlet unknown (to me) that
do not exist in any of the principal museums. They may be found in some
out of the way museum or private collection, though I doubt if they are worth
the trouble to look them up. Still I presume they have the same possible value
as those that are in the museums as they are all a very uncertain quantity.

The species of fungi are relatively few and widely distributed, a fact that
is becoming more firmly fixed every day. What constitutes a species, however,
can not be defined by words. It is only a matter of experience and individual
opinions. The question of variation which is a large factor in the truth of the
problem is hardly taken into account at all by the promoters of "new species."
And it is a question of course in which there is room for many differences
of opinion.

In the following lists of synonyms we have given our opinions of the
specimens we have seen. We do not do it with the idea that it will settle the
questions in any way, for that is impossible. "Science" nowadays consists in
raking over these old "synonyms" and arranging them chronologically, and we
suppose this process will be continued to the end of time. A "new species"
is like a spot of ink. It may not have the slightest merit or value, and may be
based solely on the fact that its author was not informed on his subject, but
there is no way to ever get rid of it.

albo-cinctus, Congo, Patouillard. Unknown to me. Seems to have the
stipe attachment of fornicatus.

argillaceus, Cuba, Murrill. Unknown.

asperulatus, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown.

avcllaneus, Central America, Murrill. Unknown.

coffeatus, West Indies, Berkeley. Type is a few fragments from which
nothing can be learned.

Currani, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown.

declivis, Pacific Island, Kalchbrenner. Unknown to me, but the description
reads like fornicatus.

flaviporus, West Indies, Murrill. Unknown.

108

SECTION GANODERMUS.

formosissimus. South America, Spegazzini. Only known to me from Rick's
determination, which (teste Bresadola) is the same as renidens.

Haenslerianus, New Zealand, Hennings. No specimen found by me at
Berlin.

incrustatus, Central America, Fries. No type exists.

Javanicus Java, Leveille. Type at Leiden in very bad condition, but I think
belongs to the section Ganodermus and has no relation whatever to Polyporus
varius, of which it was given as a "variety" by Leveille.

neglectus, Central America, Patouillard. Type is a mere fragment from
which little can be told. The species was based on large, globose spores, which
are not the normal spores of the plant. The basidial spores are typically those
of the section Ganodermus (not Amaurodermus, as named).

nutans, Central America, Fries. No type exists and its identity is unknown.
The determinations at Paris, Berlin, and London are all different from each
other and all are probably wrong. Murrill's elaborate account was only worked
up from Fries. He tells "spores not examined," which was not strange as he
never saw an authentic specimen, and I do not see how he could have examined
the spores of a specimen he never saw.

perzonatus, Cuba, Murrill. Unknown.

Pes-simiae, Brazil, Berkeley. No type exists. From the description it seems
to be Pisachapani.

praelongus, Cuba, Murrill. Unknown.

pulyerulentus, West Indies, Murrill. Unknown.

stipitatus, Central America, Murrill. Unknown.

subamboinensis, Brazil, Hennings. Same as Lauterbachii, and both are
but tropical forms of lucidus.

subfornicatus, Central America, Murrill. Unknown.

subincrustatus, West Indies. Murrill. Unknown.

Tsugae, United States, Murrill. Same as the common Polyporus lucidus of
Europe, the distinction given being that it has paler context and that Polyporus
lucidus has "one to many-layered strata varying in distinctness," all of which
was chiefly imagination on the part of the author. Polyporus lucidus is an
annual and never has strata of pores, though as it has been called "Fomes"
Mr. Murrill was undoubtedly right in thinking if it did not have strata it ought
to have. As to the paler context the same form had been named Valesiacus in
Europe, but it is not even a distinct form of lucidus.

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

The section Amaurodermus is quite close to the preceding section, but is
distinguished by large, globose, oval, colored spores, which usually have no
distinct apiculus. All are stipitate plants with usually dull (not laccate) surface
and often velutinate stems. Species rarely have smooth, laccate stems. Con-
text and hyphae are colored. All are plants of the warm countries, no species
being known in temperate regions. (Cfr. also p. 99).

5. POLYPORUS. SPORES SMOOTH OR BUT SLIGHTLY
ROUGH. STEM SLENDER, USUALLY MESOPODAL.

RUGOSUS. — Pileus dark brown, rugulose with a dull, mat sur-
face. Stem olive brown with a dull, minutely velutinate surface. Con-
text pale cinnamon, when freshly cut it turns reddish. Pores small
with thin walls. Spores globose, smooth, 6-8 or 8-10. This is quite
a common species in the East and numerous specimens from Java and
Ceylon are at Kew. I have not seen the type but Nees gave a good
figure of it, and specimens from Ceylon (Thwaite, No. 728) exactly

Fig. 403

Amaurodermus rudis

Fig. 404

Amaurodermus Sprucei with enlargement
of pore mouths.

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

accord with this figure. The fresh plant when bruised turns dark
and herbarium specimens are usually black.

RAMOSIL— Bresadola endorses this as a synonym for rugosus and I think
it is a slender form. The spores and other characters are in the main the s.uiu
but the plants are more slender and the context thinner. It occurs over the
same regions as rugosus and also the Philippines.

RUDIS (Fig. 403).— Pileus strongly rugulose with mat, dull sur-
face, minutely velutinate, light in color. Stems with olive, velutinate
surface. Pores medium, with thin walls. Context light cinnamon.
Spores globose, 9-12, with thick walls, minutely rough. The type of
rudis I have not found, but there are abundant collections so named
by Berkeley from Australia, where it seems to be common. It is close
(too close perhaps) to rugosus of the East, but seems to be more
rugulose, has larger pores and spores, and when mature retains its
color. Young specimens, however, turn black in drying.

SPRUCEI (Fig. 404). — (Change of Porothelium rugosum of
Berkeley.) Pileus dark brown, rugulose, with narrow, concentric
zones. Surface mat. Stipe pleuropodal with mat surface, concolorous.
Pores and context pale, the pore mouths pustular, hence put in the
genus Porothelium (sic) when originally named. Spores globose, 8
mic., smooth, very pale. Known only from the (abundant) types col-
lected by Spruce in Brazil. It departs from others of this section in
its spores and context being paler.

VARIABILIS (Fig. 405).— Pileus from 2 to 6 cm. broad and
about 5 mm. thick, with a lateral, slender stipe. Color pale alutaceous,
both pileus and context. Surface dull. Spores 9x 12, oval, smooth.
This is quite a distinct species, characterized by its pale color and oval
spores. It is known from two collections (Nos. 57 and 183 part) made
by Spruce in Brazil. It is badly named for it is quite uniform, but there
was confused (and figured) with it quite a different plant (cfr. Poly-
porus unilaterus, in the next section).

CALCIGENUS. — Pileus about an inch in diameter, with a red-
dish brown, laccate crust. Context pale olive. Stem mesopodal, slen-
der, with brown, mat surface. Spores abundant, oval, large, 12x16.
deeply colored, smooth. Quite distinct but known from a single speci-
men at Kew from Spruce. Brazil.

RIYULOSUS. — Pileus glabrous, rugulose (not rivulose, I think),
reddish brown with paler margin. Stem pleuropodal. branched, some-
times bearing two pilei, with a smooth, dark reddish crust. Context
thin, ligneous, pale cinnamon. Pores minute, pale but darker than the
context. Spores globose, 14 mic. faintly reticulate, with thick walls
Known only from the type in the Museum at Paris from Java. It has
the general appearance of a Ganodermus, but from its spore characters
belongs to Amaurodermus.

2 III

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

Fig. 405

Amaurodermus variabilis.

Fig. 406

Amaurodermus Chaperi.
Reduced one-half.

CHAPERI (Fig. 406). — Pileus 15 cm. broad, with a smooth,
dark crust, but not laccate. Stem hollow, with sterile branches, with
smooth, pale grayish surface. Pores minute, short with dark mouths.
Spores globose, smooth, or minutely punctate, 8-12. Known from a
single and quite old specimen in a cupboard at Paris. It was first
referred (through error) to Polypor^us scleropodius of Africa, then
described and named as above.

INTERMEDIUS. — Pileus soft, velutinate (now wrinkled) black.
Stipe mesopodal with a hard, black, smooth, laccate crust. Spores
abundant, globose, smooth, apiculate, 12 mic. Kno\vn from a single
specimen kept in a drawer at Berlin, from Africa. It was originally
sent in glycerin and is still soft and sticky.

IT2

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

Fig 407

Fig 408

Amaurodermus Auris- Amaurodermus
calpium. praetervisus.

Fig. 409

Amaurodermus
omphalodes.

AURISCALPIUM (Fig. 407). — Pileus reniform, the upper sur-
face rugulose, zonate, mat. Stipe lateral with a dull crust. Color
reddish brown. Spores 6-8, globose, smooth, pale colored. The original
Persoonian specimen from Brazil is still well preserved at Paris. Mon-
tagne referred here several collections from South America which
Berkeley and Patouillard have held to be different.

PRAETERVISUS (Fig. 408). — This is based on a single specimen from
Brazil, referred to the preceding by Montagne. As to shape, size, context, color,
and spores it is very much the same, but it has larger pores and a thicker.
blacker, harder crust.

OMPHALODES (Fig. 409).— Pileus orbicular, with a mesoppdal
stem, but rarely perfect, being usually more or less lobed and divided
to the stem. Surface glabrous but not laccate, rugulose, more or less
zoned. Stipe slender with a mat, dull surface. Pores small, 2 mm.
deep. Spores globose, 12 mic., smooth, pale. Abundant specimens
were sent to Kew from Spruce, Brazil. All have very much the same
general size and stature as our figure. At Paris are much larger,
obese (but otherwise apparently the same) specimens from S«uth
America, called "var. fulvaster."

"3

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

6.

POLYPORUS. SPORES DISTINCTLY ROUGH.
SLENDER, USUALLY MESOPODAL.

STEM

a. STIPE SMOOTH, NOT LACCATE SURFACE.

ANGUSTUS (Fig. 410).— Pileus large (10 inches in diameter)
with glabrous, strongly rugulose, zoned, dull, grayish brown, not lac-
cate, crust. Stipe mesopodal, an inch thick, with spongy context and
hard, smooth, gray, not laccate crust. Pores minute, soft, pale isabel-

Fig. 410
Amaurodermus angustus. (Reduced more than one-half) .

SECTION AMAURODERMl'S.

line, as is the context. Spores (only conidial, I think) globose, C,,],1U.«I
strongly tubercular, rough, 8 mic. A remarkable species known from
one specimen at Kew collected by Spruce in Urazil. It is the lariat
mesopodal polyporoid I have noted and grew on w, ><„!. I suspect that
its normal spores would be found to be quite different, and that the
plant is not well classed in this section. No other plant in this section,
I believe, grows on wood, and most of them have subterranean
rhizomes.

b. STIPE WITH A SMOOTH, LACCATK CRUST.

LEPTOPUS. — Pileus 5 cm. broad, il/> cm. thick, with a dark,
smooth crust. Stem, almost gone now, but enough remains to show
that it was mesopodal, about 12 cm. long, one cm. thick, and had a
dark, smooth, shiny, laccate crust. Context pale cinnamon. Pores
small, about one cm. long, pale cinnamon. Spores globose, 12 mic.,
strongly rough. The species was referred by Fries, who never saw it,
to umbraculus, of which no type exists, and I think there are no grounds
for accepting the reference. It was so accepted by Patouillard, now-
ever, who drew his characters from Persoon's specimens and knew
nothing whatever about Fries' plant. The species is only known from
the original, Persoonian specimen, preserved at Paris. It was from
the island of Rawak.

LONGIPES (Fig. 411).— Pileus unilateral, attached, with a red-
dish brown crust which is not polished (laccate) as the stipe. Stipe
slender, with a black, shiny, laccate crust. Pores large, pale cinnamon,
reaching the crust. Spores unique, globose, 12-14 mic., strongly rough,
having the asperities arranged in distinct bands or areas. This is a
very peculiar species, known only from one quite abundant collection
from French Guiana. Collector unknown. Leprieur, who made large
collections from the same locality, never found it.

RENIDEXS.— Pileus dull reddish brown. Stipe lateral, smooth,
laccate crust. Context scanty, cinnamon. Pores and pore mouths
concolorous. Spores globose, 8-9, rough. Known to me only from
the type at Berlin, from Brazil, collected by Moeller. (Plants dis-
tributed by Rick as formosissimus are said to be the same. I have
not examined their spores.) Except as to the spores this species has
the general appearance and character of Polyporus lucidus.

BASILAPIDOIDES (as Laccocephalum).— Pileus brownish fawn, with
strongly pitted surface. Context whitish. Stem short, thick, mesopodal, fo
at the base a large, hard, false sclerotium, consisting of agglutinated grains of
sand fixed by the mycelium. Spores globose, orange yellow, echinulate, ' 44-50
in." (mic.?) in diameter. This Australian species, called the "stone making
fungus," is only known in Europe from the description and figures in an Aus-
tralian publication. It was proposed as a "new genus, but I
spore characters it should be classed here.

"5

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

Fig. 411
Amaurodermus longipes.

Fig. 413

Amaurodermus unilaterus

116

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

c. STIPE WITH DULL, MINUTELY VELUTINATE SURFACE.

UNILATERUS (Fig. 413).— Pileus small (i-\y2 cm.) reddish
brown, dull surface, unilaterally attached. Stem slender (il/2-2 mm. x
7-9 cm.) with dull surface. Pores minute, 5-8 mm. deep, pale cinna-
mon with white mouths. Spores large, globose (or subglobose) 20
mic., distinctly rough. The types at Kew (Spruce, No. 207) from
llrazil were named by Berkeley in manuscript "ellipticus," but ulu-n
published they were included and figured as part of Polyporus vari-
abilis. They differ from variabilis not only in different stem insertion
but have very different spores.

FASCICULATUS. — Pileus unicolorous, pale fauve in some speci-
mens, fuliginous in others, marked with prominent, raised, narrow,
concentric zones. Context cinnamon. Stem with dull, velutinate sur-
face, light brown color. Pores minute, 3-4 mm. deep, darker color
than the context, the mouths stuffed, isabelline. Spores subglobose.
12-14. strongly rough, pale colored. A strongly marked species known
only from two collections, both from Congo, Africa. The original is
in the herbarium of Patouillard at Paris, others sent me by Edouard
Luja, Congo Beige. A character of both of these collections is that
each pileus is borne on two or more distinct stems, or perhaps the pilei
of two or more stems are consolidated into one, but they do not seem
to have that appearance.

INSULARIS (Fig. 412).— Pileus 3 cm. with a strongly wrinkled,
dull, mat surface. Pores large, pale cinnamon, in the "type" mostly
torn and destroyed. Stipe mesopodal with mat, finely velutinate sur-
face. Spores large, oval, 12x16, minutely but distinctly rough.
Known from a single specimen at Paris from New Caledonia.

7. POLYSTICTUS, PLANTS WITH THIN PILEI AND
PORE LAYERS.

Spores of some species said to be globose, colored, but I have rarely found them, Mid hence can not
state from my own knowledge. Context and pores colored, brown. Hyphae colored. I suspect some at
least have hyaline spores.

a, PORES LARGE.

GRACILIS (Fig. 414).— Pileus lateral (or unilateral) thin, dark
reddish brown, with dull surface. Stipe slender (1-2 mm. thick by
5-15 cm. long) with a dull surface, proceeding from a rhizome or
buried rootstalk. Pores large, I mm. in diameter, round or hexagonal.
Spores not found by me. This is a unique species only known from
the original collection, Spruce, Brazil. It was classed by Berkeley in
the genus Hexagona where it really belongs on its pore characters
alone. However, there is no other similar species in the genus Hex-
agona, and in its habits, context, surface, also spores probably, it
is evidently so close to this section Amaurodermus that it should be
placed here.

117

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

T

Fig. 414
Amaurodermus gracilis. (One specimen exlarged X6).

Flo. 415

Amaurodermus ocellatus.

118

Fig. 416

Amaurodermus Schomburghii

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

b. PORES SMALL.

OCELLATUS (Fig. 415).— Pileus thin but rigid. Surface
smooth, faintly zoned. Pores very minute, rigid with thick walls. The
colored hyphae have thick walls so that a cross section appears like
thickened cells. Stipe central or lateral, slender, mat, light brown.
Spores not found. Known only from Brazil collections (Spruce).
The pores are so minute that they are hardly visible, but it is all a
mistake that "the pore mouths are contracted, etc."

MACER. — I did not cut the single specimen that represents it (Spruce,
Brazil) but as to the pileus and pores it seems to me the same as the preceding.
The lateral stem, however, is blacker and I think it a different species. The
determinations, "macer, Berkeley," both at Berlin and Paris have no resemblance
to it.

SCHOMBURGKII (Fig. 416).— Pileus mesopodal or pleuropodal,
thin with zonate, smooth surface. Pores concolorous, minute. Stipe
dull, slender. Named from specimens from British Guiana in Hooker's
herbarium, but afterwards found by Spruce in Brazil.

Fig 417

Amaurodermus sericatus.
119

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

SERICATUS (Fig. 417).— Pileus thin, seal-brown, depressed in
the center, coriaceous, with a smooth, minutely velvety, shiny, satiny
surface. Stipe mesopodal, long (15-20 cm.), slender (3-5 mm. thick)
with dark, dull velvety surface. Pores minute (1-1^/2 mm. deep)
clear seal-brown, with concolorous mouths. Hyphae deeply colored.
Setae none. Spores not found, probably white. A single specimen is
at Kew, collected by J. H. Holland at Old Calabar, Africa, and referred
by error to rugosus.

HETEROMORPHUS.— Pileus depressed in the center, brown,
sub-zonate. Pores with white mouths, at least when young. Stipe
mesopodal, with dull surface. The types both at Paris and at Kew
are young collections. Several specimens in the museums I think are
referred here in error.

RENATUS.— Pileus thin, reniform, with a lateral stipe, dark red-
dish brown. Pores minute, white then brown. Stipe slender (1^2-2
mm.) with dull surface. Known from Spruce's collection in Brazil.
Ellis also determined it from Nicaragua and I think correctly. It seems
to me very close to the next, but is larger and pleuropodal.

Fig. 418

Amaurodermus exilis.

Fig. 419

Amaurodermus marasmioides.

120

SECTION AMAURODERMUS.

JURIENSIS. — Pileus thin, rigid with a minutely velutinate, rugu-
lose, dark, zonate pileus. Pores minute, white, bruising brownish.
Stipe mesopodal, slender with dark, dull, velutinate surface. Spores
globose, pale colored, 3^-4 mic. Collected in Brazil and called Poly-
stictns sacer var. juriensis by Hennings. It has no resemblance or
remote relationship even to Polyporus sacer.

EXILIS (Fig. 418).— Pileus thin, mostly mesopodal, with smooth,
faintly zonate surface, small, i-ij^ cm. Pores minute. Stipe filiform
(i mm. thick) long, wiry. Known from Spruce's collections from
Brazil. Placed in Fomes (sic) by Cooke.

MARASMIOIDES (Fig. 419).— The smallest species in this section, but
with the exception of size it has the same characters as exilis, and I think is
only a small Polyporus exilis. The specimens sent to Paris by Berkeley havfe
a little filiform stem, not over 2 cm. long, with pilei about Y* a cm.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

auriscalpioides, Brazil, Hennings=auriscalpium.

bataanensis, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown.

boleticus (Bull. Soc. Myc.) misprint for boleticeps.

Boleticeps, South America, Patouillard. Unknown to me except from illus-
tration (Bull. Soc. Myc. France, 1888, pi. 12). Seems close to omphalodes and
came from same region.

cassiaecolor, Brazil, Berkeley. A single specimen so named which, though
thick, I believe to be a thick specimen of Schomburgkii.

Clemensiae, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown.

Elmerianus, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown.

nigripes, Brazil, Fries. No type exists. Unknown. The description reads
much like leptopus.

Pala, South America, Leveille. Unknown. No type exists.

Parmula, Brazil, Berkeley=exilis.

passerinus, Brazil, Berkeley=renatus.

procerus, Brazil, Berkeley. Only two specimens so named, both immature.
One specimen has quite a long stipe. I think both are heteromorphus.

pulcher, Africa. Fries. No type exists. Figure (Afz. 19) seems to be in
this section although it has a laccate stipe.

pullatus, China, Cooke. This is a manuscript name that Berkeley gave to
an old specimen from Hong Kong, but afterward concluded that it was rudis
of Australia and did not publish it. Cooke afterward dug it up and published
it. I do not think the old specimen is rudis, but it was too poor to publish.

rufobadius, South America, Patouillard. Unknown to me except from illus
tration (Bull. Soc. Myc. France, 1889, pi. 10). Seems to me to be too close
omphalodes.

rugosus, Berkeley, Brazil (as Porothelium). The specific name being a
duplicate, was changed to Spraguei.

subrenatus, Central America, Murrill. Unknown.

subrugosus, Samoa, Bresadola=rugosus.

Umbraculum, Africa, Fries. No type exists. Unknown. Used by Patouil-
lard as a substitute for leptopus of Persoon which was not justifiable as he knew
what leptopus was and did not know as to Umbraculum. Specimen determined
by Kalchbrenner and distributed (de Thumen 708) has no possible
to Fries' description or the figure cited.

xylodes, Brazil, Berkeley^ Schomburgkii.
121

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

This section embraces stipitate species, that are subligneous but not perennial.
In texture they are similar to the preceding. They are never soft and fleshy.
The hyphae and spores are pale, in which characters they differ from the two
preceding sections. Most of them are included in Fomes in Saccardo, but none
of them are Fomes according to the definition of the genus that Sacoardo gives.

8. PLANTS WHICH FORM A SCLEROTIUM. CONTEXT
PALE OR ISABELLINE. SPORES PROBABLY WHITE.

SACER (Fig. 420). — Pileus thin, with minutely velutinate,
zonate surface. Color pale to dark brown. Stipe mesopodal, dull,
pale surface, proceeding from an underground sclerotium. Context
and pores isabelline. Pores medium small with thin walls. Polyporus
sacer is represented in the museums by a number of collections, all
from Africa. It first reached Fries and was of much interest from
the fact of having a sclerotium. The name "sacer" refers to some
superstition that the negroes are said to attach to it.

RHINOCEROTIS.— Pileus glabrous, rugulose zoned, at first thin,
then thicker and indurated. Stipe mesopodal with a dull surface, not
"laccate" as erroneously described, proceeding from a sclerotium two
or three inches in diameter. Context pale. Pores minute. This plant
is so close to Polyporus sacer that our photograph (Fig. 420) could
well represent either. It is quite different however in its minute pores,
and the tissue of old specimens becomes more thick, hard, and woody.
It was known for many years only from the imperfect type from Malay,
but recently a fine specimen was sent to Kew from Perak, and Pro-
fessor Petch has made one collection in Ceylon.

9. PILEI UNILATERAL AND SUPERIMPOSED. CONTEXT

PALE.

SUPERPOSITUS (Fig. 421).— Pileus unilateral and superim-
posed, arranged one above the other or on one side of stem, like shelves.
Surface pale isabelline, smooth. Context pale isabelline. Hyphae pale.
Spores not found, doubtless white. This species is most curious in
the peculiar arrangement of the pilei. It is known from three collec-
tions, all at Kew. First it reached Berkeley from "New England,"
Australia (not "Amer. Bor." as Saccardo incorrectly compiles it) then
Cooke got a collection from Perak and one from New Guinea. These
three from widely remote localities are all I have seen of this most
peculiar species.

10. STIPE MESOPODAL OR PLEUROPODAL. CONTEXT

WHITE OR PALE. SPORES WHITE.

CORRUGIS (Fig. 423).— Pileus with pleuropodal (rarely meso-
podal) stipe. Surface of pileus and stipe minutely velvety-brown with

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

Fig. 420
Lignosus sacer, the plant (reduced) and pore surface (natural size).

faint, metallic zones. Context white. Pores medium, firm. This is
a rare species of Europe known only from the Alps and rare tin-re.
I have seen but three collections. First, at Berlin, collected by Morthier
at Neuchatel and determined as "triqueter, Fr." Second, sent t<> r.ie
by Dr. Butignot, Switzerland, and third, in the herbarium of I'.otidier.
also from Dr. Butignot (and labeled Trametes Ilutignotii, not pub-
lished?). In its context, color, and pores it closely resembles I'oly-
porus benzoinus (a sessile species). It was named Polyporus ni^'Mi^
by Trog, then changed to Polyporus Trogii by Fries (Cfr. Sacc. 6, 82)
but when Fries published it, Hym. Eur. p. 536, he called it Polyporus
corrugis. Xo type exists in Fries' herbarium, nor I am told in that
of Trog.

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

Fig 421
Lignosus superpositus.

PREUSSII. — Pileus with a dark, nearly black, rugulose surface.
Stipe mesopodal. Context and pores pale isabelline, rigid. Pores
minute. Spores not found, but I think are white. Known from one
specimen at Berlin from Africa. The photograph would closely re-
semble Polyporus rugosus, but the plant is quite different. It is close
to the preceding if not the same. It was named by Hennings as Gano-
dermus, but does not belong to that section though it might be called a
Trametes.

DEALBATUS (Fig. 422). — Pileus lateral or unilateral with a
stem 3-8 mm. thick. Surface pale, smooth, dull with a minutely
velutinate coat (compared in its naming to a coat of whitewash). Con-
text pale. Spores globose or compressed-globose, 5-6, smooth. This

124

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

Fig. 422

Lignosus dealbatus.

Fig 423

Lignosus corriiKis.

species has been badly confused (see page 190). It was originally
collected by Ravenel in South Carolina and Curtis also found it in
North Carolina, but I think no specimens exist except these original
types. It is found in Saccardo (page 159) as Fomes and also (page
218) as Polystictus, and it is neither.

PANSUS. — Pileus rugulose, with a dull surface, strongly zoned
with brown and darker zones. Stipe mesopodal with a mat, dull sur-
face. Context thin, almost none, pale. Pores minute, \l/2-2 mm. long,
isabelline color which may be due to age, as it is described as white.
Spores abundant, globose, 8 mic., pale colored, which may also be due
to age. This is a strongly marked species of which several specimens
have reached Kew from northern South America.

DUBIOPANSUS.— This has all the characters of the preceding except that
the pores have orange mouths. This is quite uniform and appears to me a natural

125

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

color. I am told that it is caused by a Hypomyces, but I am unable to detect
the mycelial threads of a parasite in the tissue and it does not seem to explain
it to me. The spores which I think are conidial are subglobose, hyaline, apiculate,
and distinctly rough. I have a specimen from L. Damazio, Brazil, and there
is one at Kew from Georgetown, British Guiana.

PAUL/EN SIS. — Known by a single specimen from Brazil at Berlin. If not
the same it is quite close to pansus. It has a well developed, ligneous, white
context and hyaline globose, 6-7, smooth spores. Otherwise it seems the same
as pansus, particularly in its peculiar, zoned surface.

HYPOPLASTUS.— Surface dark, almost black, faintly zonate.
Stipe black, smooth, with a resinous crust. Context pale isabelline.
Spores not found, but I think they are white. The type is a mesopodal
plant, but Berkeley refers 'here (and I think correctly) two flabelli-
form specimens. All are from northern South America. This plant
differs from all others in this section in its laccate stem. While I
have found no spores, I believe it does not belong to the section
Ganodermus.

CAMERARIUS. — Pileus reniform, smooth, even, glabrous, beau-
tifully zoned with narrow, regular, concentric, brown zones. Stipe is
pleuropodal (in one specimen, probably the same, it is mesopodal)
with a dull crust. Context pale isabelline, probably white when fresh,
2-3 mm. deep, almost reaching the crust. Spores not found, probably
white. Several specimens of this are at Kew, all from northern South
America.

ARENATUS. — Pileus flabelliform, subligneous, incurved in dry-
ing. Surface gray, strongly zoned. Context white. Stipe lateral,
short, thick. Pores minute, rigid, pale. A strongly marked species
from New Guinea found in the Museum at Paris.

RHIZOMATOPHORUS.— Pileus flabelliform, thin, with smooth,
pale isabelline surface. Pores minute, concolorous. Stipe slender,
long, attached to a slender, long rhizome. A single specimen of this
is at Berlin, from Brazil. It is endorsed "=Trametes Rhizophorae"
which is surely an error.

PUDENS. — Known from a single, young, half specimen at Kew, from India.
It has a long rhizome and in some respects it resembles the preceding. I think
not much can be ascertained from this single, immature type, but it may be
recognized through comparison if found again.

POLYDACTYLUS. — This is known from one apparently abnormal speci-
men from Brazil. It has white context and a lateral stipe which divides and
bears on the ends of the branches little, orbicular, disc-like pilei. The surface
is minutely velutinate, brown, and marked with metallic zones. In its general
nature I think it is related to corrugis of Europe.

ATRO-PURPUREUS. — This is also known from a single specimen from
Brazil, and has the same context color and surface marking as the preceding.
The pilei are thinner and borne in a different manner. The pore mouths are
white, but when bruised are reddish. I think the plant is badly named.

126

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

SPORES WHITE

ii. CONTEXT BROWN OR GILVUS.
(PROBABLY.)

a. STIPE NOT BLACK.

BRUNNEO-PICTUS— Pileus suborbicular or reniform with a
smooth, brown zoned surface. Context brown, hard, with hyphae
deep yellow tinder the glass. Pores minute with pale mouths but brown
context. Stipe lateral, hard, with dull brown surface. Spores not
found, but I think without question are white. This is a rigid, well-
marked species, known from several collections of Spruce, all from
Brazil. When young it is thin, but becomes thicker with age. The
thin, young specimens contract strongly in drying and were called
Polyporus semiclausus by Berkeley.

Fig. 424

Lignosus Zambesianus.
(Top of Pileus)

127

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

ZAMBESIANUS (Fig. 424). — Pileus strongly rugulose with a
distinct, dull crust, brown, zonate. Context gilvus, rigid. Stipe meso-
podal (but not preserved with the type). Pores small, 8 mm. deep,
gilvus context and brown mouths. Hyphae bright yellow under the
microscope. Setae none. Spores not found, but doubtless white.
This is known from a single specimen, preserved at Kew and collected
in Zambesi in 1881. It was misreferred to rudis. It is the only meso-
podal polyporoid I ever saw with gilvus context.

Fig. 425

Lignosus scopulosus.

b. STIPE BLACK— MELANOPUS.

SCOPULOSUS (Fig. 425).— Pileus with a smooth, pale, thin
crust. Stipe lateral, black, with a black crust. Context punky, isa-
belline, with slender, pale hyphae. Pores minute, isabelline, with con-
colorous mouths. Spores hyaline. This is a frequent plant in the
East and has been well illustrated by Reichardt under the name
Trametes Rhizophorae, under which name it has been well known
to me for a number of years. It is a noteworthy plant with its black
stem, and smooth, pale pileus. It is given in Saccardo as a Fomes,
but is a ligneous Polyporus or might be classed as a Trametes.

128

SECTION LIGNOSUS.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

Butignoti, Europe, Boudier (as Trametes, published ?)=corrugis.

canalium, China, Loureiro. Too ancient and vague to be entitled to a place
even in synonymy. "Described" 120 years ago and never seen since. Said to
be "white and viscid. '

hemibaphus, Brazil, Berkeley=obese camerarius.

obsoletus, Brazil, Fries. No type exists. I judge it is similar to brunneo-
pictus.

pallidus, Brazil, Berkeley^ camerarius.

Rhizophorae, East Indies, Reichardt (as Trametes) =scopulosus. It was well
illustrated and has generally been called under this name.

rhodophaeus, Java, Leveille. This was described as having a short, lateral
stipe (or sessile). The type specimen (at Leiden) is sessile and is now referred
to semilaccatus, which is I believe always a sessile species.

scleropodius, Africa, Leveille=sacer.

semiclausus, Brazil, Berkelev— brunneo pictus.

Trogii, Europe, Fries. This was a name proposed for rugosus of Trog,
but when Fries published it he called it Polyporus corrugis.

triqueter in the sense of Quelet is corrugis. Not the same as in the sense
of Romell and Bresadola.

SECTION PETALOIDES.

We include in this section most species that have lateral stipes, embracing
for the most part the divisions Petaloides of Polyporus and Discipedes of
Polystictus as found in Saccardo. The more woody species (Lignosus) are
classed in the preceding sections. Also in the section Melanopus are found those
species with black, lateral stems.

Fig. 426

Petaloides hirtus.
I29

SECTION PETALOIDES.

12. CARNOSUS. FLESHY, SOFT, THICK SPECIES.

HIRTUS (Fig. 426). — Surface brown, velutinate or hirsute.
Flesh white. Stipe lateral. Spores peculiar, fusiform, 6x14-16,
hyaline, smooth. A very rare plant both in Europe and the United
States.

AQUOSUS— This has a strong, lateral stipe. Flesh white, soft,
watery, thick, drying thin. Pores small, white. Known from two
collections, both from Brazil, also one (?) from India.

RUTROSUS. — A good picture of a petaloid, fleshy, white species with
medium large pores, published by Rostkovius seventy years ago. Found or
imagined in Germany, but known to no one since.

Fig. 427
Petaloides fusco-maculatus

FUSCO-MACULATUS (Fig. 427).— Flesh soft, watery, not
"papyraceus-membranaceous" but so drying. Surface spotted with
minute spots. Pores large. Spores oblong, 3-4x8-10. Found by me
in Samoa. Has no relation to squamosus to which it was compared.

GLUTINIFER. — Known from a single, sliced specimen at Kew, and is I
think probably the same as the preceding. It is said to have come from Mauritius,
but it was more probably from Australia.

Osseus. See Addenda, page 191.

130

SECTION PETALOIDES.

13-

POLYPORUS. FLESHY, THIN SPECIES, COLOR
WHITE OR PALE. PORES SMALL.

ANNULATUS (Fig. 428). — A small, white species with a short
stipe expanded into a disc at the base. Originally from Java (well
illustrated by Junghuhn). Found by me in Samoa. It grows attached
to sticks on the ground.

RHIPIDIUM. — Stipe lateral, expanding above. Color white ( ?)
when fresh, reddish when dried. Pores medium with thin walls. The
type form is rare in the United States. It is large, but otherwise the
same as the little form, called pusillus by Persoon, which occurs fre-
quently throughout the tropical world.

FRACTIPES.— White, with a lateral, white stipe. Pores small,
slightly rose colored. Surface dull. Rare in the United States. Also
found in Brazil, by Rev. J. Rick.

Fig. 428
Petaloides annulatus.

Fig 429

Petaloides nivicolor.

Flo. 430
Petaloides biokoensu.

NIVICOLOR (Fig. 429).— Pure white, with smooth surface.
Pores small, white. Not truly stipitate, but the pileus extends behind
into a stipe-like prolongation. Known only from New Zealand, but
there are abundant specimens at Kew.

BIOKOENSIS (Fig. 430).— Pileus clear yellow when fresh,
bleaching out to white in drying. Surface smooth, faintly zoned.
Stipe short lateral, concolorous. Pores minute, yellow when fresh,
isabelline when dry. Spores (conidial?) globose, hyaline, smooth,
4-S mic The plant contracts in drying and the color change 11
usual and marked. Very rare in Samoa, collected by me but (
Named by Bresadola. Type unknown to me.

I31

SECTION PETALOIDES.

PENETRALIS. — Pileus spathulate, tapering to a long- stem.
Color pale. Pores small. Grew on stem of tree ferns in greenhouse
in England. No type in the museums, but it is well illustrated. (Jour.
Bot., 1875, t. 162.)

CANDIDUS.— Pure white with a lateral stipe. Pores small. Seems to be
well illustrated (Persoon, Myc. Europe, t. 15), but is unknown from specimens
in any museums or recent collection. Referred as being a form of chioneus by
Fries, but it is surely not.

OBLIQUUS. — Context pale, darker in drying. Pores il/2-2 mm.
long. Pileus with a long, lateral stem. Known from one collection,
New Guinea, at Kew. With the exception of long pores it has a
resemblance to obovatus.

14. POLYPORUS. FLESHY, THIN SPECIES, COLOR
WHITE OR PALE. PORES LARGE, FAVOLOID.

JANSEANUS (Fig. 431).— Pileus thin, fleshy, pure white, taper-
ing to a long stem. Pores large, favoloid. Known from one collec-
tion from Java, preserved in alcohol at Berlin.

Fig 431 Fig. 432

Petaloides Janseanus. Petaloides brachyporus.

BRACHYPORUS (Fig. 432).— Pileus thin, tapering- to a lateral
stipe. Pores large, shallozv. Dried specimens dark and brittle, but I
judge white or pale when fresh. Originally from French Guiana, in
the herbarium of Montagne. There is also a collection at Berlin from
Brazil, which Hennings has named as a "new species," but I have
mislaid my memorandum as to what he called it.

132

SECTION PETALOIDES.

15. POLYPORUS. THIN, RIGID. COLOR PALE ROSE OR
REDDISH BROWN. NOT ZONATE OR ONLY

FAINTLY ZONATE.

MODESTUS (Fig. 433). —Color when fresh pale cinnamon or
rose, becoming in old specimens reddish brown. Pores minute. Sur-
face dull. Rarely distinctly stiped, but reduced to a short stipe-like
base. Appears to be frequent in tropical America and usually named
by Berkeley albo-cervinus.

RUBIDUS. — This from the East is close to modcstus, and I
know of no marked difference. It is thicker, not so spathulate. and
has but a faint indication of a stipe. I am told by Professor Fetch
that when old, dark discolored patches usually appear on the top. It
is common to Ceylon and I think in other parts of the Kast.

Fig 433 Fig 434

Petaloides modestus. Petaloides Didrichensii.

BRUNNEOLUS.— The best specimen is in the British Museum.
Those at Kew are poor. It is quite close to rubidus, but the context
and general color are more brown. It seems to be common in the
Philippines, and in recent determinations under the name atypus is
confused with rubidus.

PETALODES. — Surface dark reddish brown with appressed
fibrils. Context pale. Pores minute. Stipe lateral, thick. Known
from a single specimen at Kew, collected in Brazil by Spruce.

DIDRICHSENII (Fig. 434).— Very similar to modestus, but
with distinctly larger pores. Only type known, from Borabora (Society
Is.), is at Kew. It seems to be frequent in the East and was n-cri\vd
abundantly from Ceylon and called Menziesii by Berkeley.

BRUNNEO-MACULATUS.— Abundant specimens are at Kew.
named brunneo-pictus by Cooke from Malay. They are light
brown, with medium pores and subzonate. slightly rugulose pilei,
marked with darker brown spots. It is the basis of the record of

133

SECTION PETALOIDES.

brunneo-pictus from Malay, in Saccardo, but has no resemblance to
the original from Brazil.

MARIANUS. — Known only from the original. It is close to modestus,
but not the same. The color is not the same and it is more rigid. The two
following are close to Marianus.

ASPERULUS.— From New Caledonia. Type at Paris.
BRACHYPUS.— From West Indies. Type at Paris.

Konigii— The only type at the British Museum from Ceylon comes in this section, but I have not a
very clear idea of it

16. POLYPORUS. THIN, RIGID. STRONGLY ZONATE
WITH GRAYISH ZONES.

GALLOPAVONIS. — Pileus rigid, thin, usually orbicular or reni-
form with short, lateral stem. Surface with narrow, concentric,
gray zones. Pores minute, pale yellowish. Very common in the East,
in Java, the Philippines, Samoa, and Australia.

Fig 435

Petaloides Gaudichaudii.

GAUDICHAUDII (Fig. 435).— Pileus thin, with short, lateral
stipe. Surface with narrow, concentric, gray zones. Pores medium.
Close to the preceding but thinner, flexible, and the pores are distinctly
larger. Specimen distributed in Zollinger's collection as Blumei be-
longs here.

INCURVUS. — Pileus thin, rigid, incurved in drying. Surface
with strongly cinereous or fuliginous zones. Stipe lateral, from 2-8
cm. long. Pores small, dark. Specimens from Java and Malay.

134

SECTION PETALOIDES.

17. PILEUS YELLOWISH BROWN, GILVUS. HYPHAE
DEEP YELLOW UNDER THE MICROSCOPE.

MALIENCIS. — Pileus dark tobacco-brown, rigid, foliaceous, the
type being crenately lobed. Stipe short, thick, lateral. Pores short,
dark, small. Setae none. There are liberal collections at Kew from
Perak.

ARATOIDES. — Close to the preceding and so referred by Bresadola. The
type from New Caledonia is more even, not crenate. However, it is probably
the same plant.

DISCI PES.— Close to maliencis. but longer pores, not foliaceous, and the
type is not so dark in color. Type at Kew is from Ceylon.

GLAZIOVII. — Pileus orbicular, thin, brown, with long, lateral
stem, in the same plane. Pores minute, brown. Context is thin,
brown. Hyphae yellow (but not deep yellow, hence not truly in this
section). Stipe lateral, dull surface. Spores not found, but I believe
are white. Only known from specimens at Kew from Brazil.

Fig. 436
Petaloides musashiensis.

MUSASHIENSIS (Fig. 436).— Entire plant brown, gilyus.
Pileus orbicular, thin, dry, rigid, with soft, velutmate surface. ,
laterally-dorsally attached, concolorous. Pores minute, concolo
with soft velutinate pore mouths. Colored setae rare. Spor

135

SECTION PETALOIDES.

found but surely white. As to its context, color, velutinate surface and
colored setae this corresponds to Fomes pomaceus, but the presence of a
stipe removes it from all species with similar structure. Specimen col-
lected by S. Kawamura, Japan. Referred to Hennings' species on the
description only as there was no type in the cover when I visited Berlin.

18. GRAMMOCEPHALUS GROUP. PILEUS MARKED
WITH RAISED LINES.

A varying assortment of plants that could be referred to one species, and still have marked differ-
ences. Those with large pores run into Favolus.

a. PORES SMALL. SETAE NONE.

GRAMMOCEPHALUS (Fig. 437).— The type form from the
Philippines is orbicular or reniform, reddish brown with medium
small pores. This is quite a frequent plant in several countries and
seems to vary, so it is hard to decide what to consider as its varieties.

Fig 437
Petaloides grammocephalus.

PERVERSUS (Fig. 438). — Only a variety of grammocephalus, more spathu-
late and of darker color. Determined, published, and distributed (Copeland,
No. 18) as Polyporus coracinus which, teste the description, viz. : with colored
setae, and teste Bresadola, is quite a different plant. I have not seen coracinus
except this evidently mis-named specimen. This form of grammocephalus is
common in Samoa.

CAYENNENSIS (Fig. 440). — The American form from South America.
Pores minute. Color pale, form spathulate.

I36

SECTION PETALOIDES.

Fig 438

Petaloides perversus.

Fig. 439

Petaloides albellus.

Fig. 440
Petaloides Cayenner

ALBELLUS (Fig. 439).— Similar to the preceding but has larger pores.
White. From IncHa, also from Chas. O'Connor, Mauritius.

MACULATUS.— A spotted form (?), dark, known only from a single speci-
men, Malay.

PLATOTIS. — Known from a partial specimen (Australia). It seems from
the color, surface, and pores to be thick grammocephalus, but is much too thick,
and apparently does not belong to the section.

b. PORES LARGE, FAVOLOID, RUNNING INTO FAVOLUS.

EMERICL— Pileus the same as that of the type form of grammocephalus.
but the pores are larger. From India.

FUSCO-LINEATUS. — This is an obese form of grammocephalus with a
short, thick stem, i-iJ/2 cm. thick. The pores are larger than the type form.
The surface is smooth, but lined. It was figured in the Trans. Linnenn Soc.,
2d series, vol. i.

FAVOLOIDES. — (As a form of grammocephalus.) Pileus corresponds to
the type form of grammocephalus, but the pores are large, favoloid. I think it
is a better Favolus. Known from Africa.

DORCADIDEUS.— Color rich cinnamon brown. Surface vel-
vety-tomentose with soft, brown hairs. Marked with branched, vein-
like reticulations. Pores large, 2-3 mm. deep. Stipe short, lateral.
The surface is covered with simple, colored hairs, which have no rela-
tion to those of russiceps. There are no cystidia on the hymcimun.
This strongly marked species is known from but one specimen at the
British Museum, from Australia.

137

SECTION PETALOIDES.

setae. See

Bearing on the pileus
Fig. 441.

c. SETAEFERA.

( species on the hymenium,

ry peculiar colored spiny or branched

CINNAMOMEO-SQUAMULOSUS (Fig. 441).— Pileus and
pores dark cinnamon brown, both densely covered with peculiar, col-
ored, branched setae. Pores small. A most striking species known
from collections of Dr. Zenker, Camerun, Africa.

Fig. 441

Petaloides cinnamomeo-squamulosus with two types of peculiar cystidia found on the hymenium.
(Drawing by Miss Wakefield).

RUSSICEPS. — Color of pileus dark cinnamon brown, same color
and peculiar setae as the preceding, but in this species the setae are
absent from the pores. Pores small, pale. Not a form of grammo-
cephalus as given, but closely allied to the preceding. Only known
from Ceylon.

19. POLYPORUS. SPECIES DARK COLORED, ALMOST
BLACK AT LEAST WHEN DRY.

a. SETAEFERA.

MEGALOPORUS (Fig. 442).— Pileus dark, spotted, with short,
lateral stipe. Pores large, subfavoloid. Hymenium with numerous
very peculiar setae (same nature as those of the preceding section).
Known from one specimen in Montague's herbarium from South
America. It is close to Favolus princeps in its peculiar setae, but
otherwise I think it is different.

138

SECTION PETALOIDES.

Fig. 442
Petaloides megaloporus with the peculiar cystidia. (Drawing by Miss Wakefield).

b. WITHOUT SETAE.

COCHLEARIFORMIS.— Plant black now but has probably
changed in drying. Spathulate with a long stipe. Context thin, of
peculiar, thick-walled hyphae cells such as have not been otherwise
noted by me. Pores small, dark now. Spores globose, 5 mic., white.
Only known from types at Kew, from Malay.

TRISTICULUS. — Color dark, almost black, thin, smooth. Pores
small. Stipe short, lateral. Known from but two specimens, one at
Paris and the other at Kew.

(Cfr. also stereinus and holotephrus in Sect'on 22.)

20. POLYPORUS. COLORED CONTEXT AND SPORES.

(All of the preceding are supposed to have white spores.)

I do not know that there are any species with colored context and spores
and lateral stems except in the section Ganodermus. The cotype specimen
Kew of Polyporus sideroides has these characters, but the type specimen at
Leiden has a thick, spongy, pleuropodal stipe and would be looked for in section
35 of Spongiosus.

139

SECTION PETALOIDES.

21. ABERRANT SPECIES FORMING "NEW GENERA."

POCULA (Fig-. 443). — A little species, the smallest known, and
for many years supposed to be a Sphaeria. A full account is given
in Myc. Notes, Pol. Issue p. 44. It is not rare in the United States
and occurs also in South America, Australia, and Japan.

Fig. 443

Petaloides Pocula. Natural size; also two specimens (X6), and the face of pores (X6).

A

4

Fig. 444

Petaloides pusiolus. Enlarged six diameters. Also drawing by Miss Wakefield showing cystidia
much magnified and a section of the pores enlarged.

PUSIOLUS (Fig. 444).— Pileus obconic, pendant, 3-4 mm. in
diameter, with a short stipe. Surface brown, appearing velutinate from
the enlarged projecting ends of the hyphae tissue. Context isabelline,

140

SECTION PETALOIDES.

the hyphae pale colored. Spores not found but on the hymenium are
peculiar, horn shaped, acute, hyaline cystidia. This diminutive species
came from Sarawak and there are co-types at Kevv. I was much
pleased to find in it an analogue of the little Polyporus pocula of the
United States, heretofore supposed to be unique. It figures in our
"literature" as a Fomes (sic). It is the antithesis of Fomes.

Fig. 446
Petaloides rautabilis.

Fig. 445
Petaloides obovatus.

22. POLYSTICTUS. PILEUS PALE (IN ONE SPECIES DRY-
ING BLACK), USUALLY SPATHULATE 1 OR FLABEL-
LIFORM, THIN. PORES IN A THIN LAYER,

WHITE OR PALE, MINUTE.

MUTABILIS (Fig 446).— Pileus thin, marked with ochraceous
or grayish zones! V%f common in Brazil and also occurs m southern
United States.

OBOVATUS (Fig. 445).-Very close to the preccdi ng and I
am not sure that it is distinct. It is not so strongly zoned. Usually
tapering to the stem. Seems common in Java and t

141

SECTION PETALOIDES.

seen no authentic specimens of obovatus, but teste Bresadola, dilatus
(bis) of Berkeley is a synonym and there is an abundance of that
at Kew.

PET ALIFORMIS.— Usually cuneate, tapering to the base. I
judge from specimens I saw at Berlin that it has a rooting stem. Usu-
ally faintly zonate and marked with striations. Close to mutabilis and
of the same distribution, but is quite different I think.

STEREINUS. — Pileus thin, attenuate behind and sometimes with
a short stem, evidently soft and watery when fresh but drying thin,
rigid, incurved, and turning black. It seems very common in tropical
America, also from the East.

HOLOTEPHRUS.— Spathulate, attenuate at the base but hardly
stipitate. Pores minute. Color almost black with metallic zones, and
I think has not changed in drying. Known from the type at Kew
from Cuba.

ARMENICOLOR. — Pileus thin, minutely pubescent, brown-
zoned, tapering to a short but distinct stipe. Pores small, white. Ex-
cept as to its distinct stem this plant is more closely allied to the versi-
color group. It is known from one collection at Kew from Cuba.

ANTILOPUS. — This is quite a frequent plant in the museums,
and I found it also in Samoa, that had been misdetermined either as
russogramme or rasipes or palensis. It is referred by Bresadola to
"vibecinus var. antilopus, Kalch." and it agrees with the cotype at
Kew. No specimens of vibecinus are preserved and I think no one
knows what it was.

23. POLYSTICTUS-MICROPORUS. LATERAL STEM.

(Cfr. also pleuropodal species page 173.;

The section Microporus, which has been held to be a genus, is characterized
by its thin, rigid context, reddish brown color and minute pores in a very thin
layer. We have published a "Synopsis of the section Microporus" with illus-
trations of the species.

AFFINIS (Fig. 447).— Stipe lateral, smooth, dark bay or black.
Pileus smooth. Frequent throughout the East.

LUTEUS. — Same as affinis but more obese and thicker. Fre-
quent and runs into affinis.

MAKUENSIS. — Same as luteus but with distinctly larger pores. Referred
in my Synopsis as a synonym for luteus, which I think on re-examining the type
is an error. Known from one collection at Kew from Africa.

PORPHYRITIS. — Probably the same as luteus, but from America, where
all of this section are rare.

142

SECTION PETALOIDES.

Fig 447
Petaloides affinis.

Fig. 448
Petaloides vernicipes.

CARNEO-NIGER. — Same characters as luteus except its black color. Oc-
curs in the East. It is the same plant as microloma, an earlier name for it.

FLABELLIFORMIS.— Stipe black, lateral. Pilcus with pubes-
cent zones. Same as luteus except the pubescent zones of the pileus.
It varies in all degrees however as to this character. It is the most
abundant species in Africa, Samoa, and the East in general.

PTERYGODES.— Pileus sessile; hence does not belong to this section but
placed here from analogy, as it is surely a sessile plant of the same nature as
the other and perhaps simply a sessile condition of xanthopus.

4 143

SECTION PETALOIDES.

24. POLYPORUS (CORRESPONDING TO POLYSTICTUS,

BUT THICKER) WITH COLOR AND PORES OF

THE SECTION MICROPORUS.

VERNICIPES (Fig. 448).— Pileus smooth, rugulose, faintly
zonate, shiny, thick, 2-3 mm., rigid. Pores minute. Specimens from
Japan, Philippines, and Africa.

SUBFULVUS. — Plant smooth, rigid, pale ochraceous, smooth,
with a short, thick, sublateral stem. Pores concolorous, minute, rigid,
2-3 mm. long. Specimens (Wright 135 & 355) at Kew from Cuba,
published as ochrotinctus of Bonin Island. Subfulvus was Berkeley's
manuscript name and a good name for it.

SIENNAECOLOR. — Comparable to a thick specimen of Polystictus luteus.
Same color and pores, but on the Polyporus order with a thick, short, dorsal
stem. Known from one specimen from Ceylon. The Brazilian specimen cited
was something else I think.

25. RED SPECIES.

SANGUINEUS. — Perhaps no other one species is as abundant
in the museums as this. It is the common red species that grows in
every warm country of the world. It is strangely rare in Samoa,
however. A short, lateral stem, often disci form at the base, is a
feature of most collections, but not always, as museum specimens are
sessile and even dimidiate. It is close to Polystictus cinnabarinus, the
red species of temperate regions, but typically it is thinner and smoother
and I think cinnabarinus is never stalked. There is no other bright
red species of the tropical world that is likely to be confused with
Polystictus sanguineus. Bleached specimens are sometimes collected
that have lost all their red color.

CINNABARINUS.— The red species of the temperate world,
very similar to the above but thicker and not so brightly colored.
It rarely if ever has a distinct stalk, hence does not belong in this
section, but we so place it from its evident close relation to the pre-
ceding. While not stipitate, it is attached by a reduced base, rarely
dimidiate, hence it is related even in its attachment to the stipitate
species. Polystictus cinnabarinus is rather rare in Europe, usually on
birch, very common in America and favors especially cherry and
beech. While ordinarily easily distinguished from the southern species,
sanguineus, specimens occur in intermediate territory that are hard to
refer.

(Miniatus of Java from its shape might be sought in this section The brittle, caseous flesh so closely
allies it to sulphureus that we place it in that section.)

144

SECTION PETALOIUES.

26. POLYSTICTUS. WHITE SPECIES.

CONCH IFER.— Pileus white, with a short, lateral stem Hear-
ing: usually secondary, abortive pilei. For a full account see Poly-
poroid Issue page 41. A common plant, always on elm branches in
the United States.

• N°*e~ £ number of species of Polystictus such as the form elongatuo of pergamtniu have the
pilei usually reduced to an attenuate base and might be sought in this section.

Note.— Glabernmus, South America, Montague (as Irpex) and nepalensis India Berkeley .,.,,1 Pocoi
Japan, Berkeley each known from a single collection, have short, lateral sir,,,;. »,,,| would b? sought h™
Ulaberrimus is close to hiformis as to it« pores. The types of nepalensis are quite |Kmr and it mav he the
same as glabernmus. Pocos has hirsute pileus and medium large pores.

SPECIES UNKNOWN TO MK.

Except leiodermus no specimens of any of these have been found by me in the museum* of Europe
Agaricon, Java, Zollinger.
albo-luteus, Asia, Rostrup.
atro-albus. Africa, Hennings.
bambusicola, India. Hennings.
Baurii, Africa, Kalchbrenner.
cotyledoneus, South America, Spcgazzini.
cuneatiformis, Philippines, Murrill.
decrescens, Java. Zollinger.
dilatatus, Java, Leveille.
discifer, Java, Patouillard.
evanido-squamulosus, Africa, Hennings.
Gregonii, Africa, Smith
Gualaensis. South America, Patouillard.
hirto-lineatus, Java, Patouillard.
incompletus, Borneo, Cesati.
labiatus, West Indies, Patouillard.

leiodermus, South America, Montagne. My photograph and notes as to this plant do not agree,
hence I can not refer it at present.

manubriatus, Sumatra, Leveille.
mpnachus, South America, Spegazzini.
olivascens, Asia, Rostrup.
parvimarginatus South America, Spegazzini
Pentzkei, Australia. Kalchbrenner.
prostratus, China, Patouillard.
subhydrophilus, Brazil, Spegazzini.
subpendulus, United States, Atkinson,
substereinus, Cuba, Murrill.
tigrinus, Asia, Rostrup.
udus. Java, Junghuhn.
vitiensis, Pacific Island, Reichardt.

SYNONYMS AND REJECTED SPECIKS.

Adami, Ceylon, Cookc. Change of dilatus (bis) which is ohovatus.

albo-cervinus, Brazil, Berkeley=modestus. This is the name generally used
by Berkeley, who took modestus correctly at first but afterwards changed on
the evidence of a specimen in Kunze's exsiccatae which is not the same as the
specimen in the same exsiccatae at Upsala.

anisoporus, Europe, Montagne. Type inadequate, probably a little, unde-
veloped specimen of Favolus europaeus.

annularius, Java, Fries. Merely an unauthorized and unnecessary change
of annulatus of Junghuhn.

apophysatus, Europe, Rostkovius. Only known from an old picture which
is probably something abnormal.

atro-cervinus, Brazil. Error in Saccardo for albo-cervinus.

atypus, Java, Leveille. No type exists as far as I could find at Leiden. In
the sense of Bresadola it is brunneolus. Determinations of Murrill are largely
rubidus.

aurora, Borneo, Cesati (as Trametes). Not seen by me, but stated by Mur
rill to be a synonym for atypus, in which case it is probably rubidus, as many
of MurrilPs determinations of atypus are.

bomfinensis, Brazil, Hennings (as Fomes, sic )= Polystictus mutabihs.

H5

SECTION PETALOIDES.

caryophyllaceus, South America, Cooke. Type a little remnant, inadequate
but probably or possibly mutabilis.

celebicus, East Indies, Hennings=carneo-niger.

cervicornis, West Indies, Cooke. Something abnormal, but not a synonym
for mutabilis as stated.

cervino-nitens, South America, Berkeley (Schweinitz mss.)=modestus and
was at first so referred.

cinerascens, East Indies, Leveille. No type found by me. In the sense of
Bresadola it is the same as incurvus, of which nice specimens are at Kew.

confundens, Borneo, Cesati=gallopavonis.

coracinus, Philippines, Murrill. Unknown to me. The specimen distributed
to Kew (Copeland No. 18) and cited by the author is a form of grammocephalus,
which does not have cystidia and is an entirely different species from the "type,"
teste Bresadola in a letter. I have not seen the type, but it was described as
having "branched cystidia" and, teste Bresadola, is close to cinnamomeo-
squamosus if not the same.

crenatus, Ceylon, Berkeley. This at best is a form of flabelliformis with
the pubescence covering a small area at the base of the stipe rather than in
zones. Only types are at the British Museum. Specimens of Leveille's naming
at Leiden and Paris are both wrong.

cretatus, United States, Cooke. Change of Ravenelii (bis) which being in
his sense mutabilis was not worth changing.

cupuliformis, United States, Berkeley=pocula.

Currani, Philippines, Murrill=vernicipes.

decolor, Brazil, Berkeley. Type inadequate.

delicatus, United States, Berkeley=a small specimen of fractipes.

dendriticus, Mexico, Fries. No type exists. Fries cites Curtis' number 1481
which I do not find at Kew, but on Curtis' notes Berkeley has endorsed "arcticus,
Klotzsch."

dilatus (bis), Ceylon, Berkeley=obovatus.

diminutus, Australia, Massee. Type is not preserved, but from the figure
and description I have no doubt it was based on rhipidium.

eriopus, Borneo, Cesati. Unknown to me. Seems from the description
to be flabelliformis.

fibro-radians, South America, Montagne=mutabilis or close.

flabellato-lobatum, Africa, Hennings. Teste Bresadola=cinerescens (brun-
neolus). I found no type at Berlin.

gallinaceus, Brazil, Berkeley=mutabilis.

geminella, Moeller, Brazil (as new genus, "Henningsii")=:petaliformis.

hispidellus, United States, Peck='hirtus of Europe.

Holstii, Africa, Hennings, also in my Synopsis,=incomptus.

Hostmanni, South America, Berkeley. Type inadequate. There is a better
specimen at the British Museum.

humilis, United States, Peck='fractipes.

hydrophilus, Cuba, Berkeley. Type inadequate. Compare stereinus.

inconspicuus, Africa, Miquel. Said by the author to be the same as Host-
manni.

intonsus, Tasmania, Berkeley. No type exists.

involutus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Not worth the trouble to bother with his
cartoons.

Kurzianus, Java, Cooke=Blumei.

lacer, Java, Saccardo or Cooke, change of lacerus (why?).

lacerus, Java, Junghuhn=obovatus probably, more thin and tapering it seems
to me.

languidus, Africa, Fries. (Fomes in Saccardo.) No type exists. Stated
by Fries to be the same as monochrous, which if true is the same as modestus
and surely not a Fomes.

lenzitoides, Brazil, Berkeley. Same plant as aquosus, which is a much better
name for it.

146

SECTION PETALOIDES.

Leprieurii (bis), South America, Montagne (as Enslenia)=pocula

Leveillei Java, Cooke. Change of cinerescens, then changed back

Libum, Australia, Berkeley. Type inadequate.

licmophorus, India, Massec=pale form of affinis or possibly a dark form of
obovatus.

Liebrnanni, Mexico, Fries. Type at Upsala, inadequate, a little piece about
the size of an oyster cracker. Teste Bresadola it is the same as stereinus It is
black and curved in drying, but I think is rather thick for stereinus

hgomformis, Europe, Bonorden. Unknown. Alleged to be yellow small
pores, white flesh, reddish when broken.

liturarius, Pacific Island, Berkeley. No type exists.

malacensis, error in Saccardo for maliencis.

Meleagris, Pacific Island, Berkeley,=:gallo-pavonis.

Menziesii, Sumatra, Berkeley=Didrichsenii.

microloma, Philippines, Leveille=:carneo-nigcr, and an earlier name for it.
I have seen the type since my Synopsis was published, it having been placed
in its cover since.

minutissimus, Asia, Rostrup. I have not seen this, but I judge from the
description it is rhipidium.

Mollerianus, Africa, Saccardo. Teste Bresadola, this is a stipitate form of
Polyporus vinosus. I have seen no stipitate forms. Bresadola refers vinosus
to badius of Junghuhn, not Berkeley.

monochrous. South America, Montagne,=modestus. It was first referred
to Feei. This is in the sense of Berkeley. "Monochrous, Mont." is quite a
different plant.

murinus, Java, Leveille. No type found by me at Leiden. Teste Fries and
Bresadola it is same as brunneolus. Most of Murrill's Philippine determinations
are gallopavonis.

Muelleri, Australia, Kalchbrenner is grammocephalus or a form at best.

nanus, Australia, Massee=rhipidium.

nigrescens, Brazil, Cooke— stereinus (??)

notopus, Java, Leveille. (Nothopus in Saccardo.) The type at Paris is a
little specimen, too inadequate to form an opinion.

palensis, Philippines, Murrill. I have seen more than one species so named
by the author, but most of them I would refer to antilopus.

peltatus, Central America, Fries. No type exists.

pendula, an alleged synonym for pocula used as a juggle. Not based on any
evidence but is contrary to the specimens of the author.

peroxydatus, Australia, Berkeley. No type exists.

petaloides, Europe, Fries. No specimens or figures exist. It was based on
one collection sent from Pomerania. Unknown now.

phlebophorus, New Zealand, Berkeley. Same as nivicolor, which is a much
better name for it.

polygrammus, Cuba, Berkeley=pctaliformis.

pseudo-cinerascens, New Guinea, Hennings=gallo-pavoms.

puellaris, Pacific Island, Kalchbrenner=:atypus, tcste Bresadola on the label
at Berlin For me atypus in sense of Bresadola is brunneolus.

pusillus, West Indies, Leveille (or Persoon, mss.)=rhipidium.

putidus, Central America, Fries. No type exists.

rasipes, East Indies, Berkeley=obovatus.

Ravenelii (bis), United States, Berkeley. No type found by me. In the
sense of Cooke it^mutabilis. There is a cotype in the British Museum from
Ravenel, which is same as mutabilis, but has no resemblance to dealbatus
erroneously stated.

rigescens, Perak, Cooke=stereinus.

rufo-ochraceus, South America, Patouillard=mutabilis.

russogramme, East Indies, Berkeley. Type inadequate. It has large pores
and seems to be something well marked.

147

SECTION PETALOIDES.

squamaeformis, Borneo, Berkeley. No type exists.

stereoides, Cuba, Berkeley. Not published but is a manscript name for plants
published as stereinus. The reference in Saccardo, p. 219, probably refers to a
Brazilian collection which is mutabilis.

sterinoides, Brazil, Hennings=petaliformis.

Stuckertianus, South America, Spegazzini. Seems from the description to
be rhipidium, the large, type form.

subflabellum, Africa, Hennings. The types are in alcohol and I can not
form much of an opinion of them.

subpulverulentus, Cuba, Berkeley. A form of rhipidium at the best.

subverniceps, Philippines, Murrill=pterygpdes.

subvernicosus, Brazil, Hennings=porphyritis or close to it. It seems to be
a slightly thicker plant.

subzonalis, Australia, Cooke=gallp-pavonis, pale form.

tomohomiensis, East Indies, Hennings=grammocephalus.

torquescens, Africa, Saccardo=biokoensis, teste Bresadola=zonalis, teste
Patouillard. Unknown to me.

unguicularis, Mexico, Fries. No type exists. Judging from the description
it is probably the same as mutabilis. Mr. Murrill informs us that it is "only
known from the type locality" and that he did not examine the spores. As
he evidently never saw a specimen, as none exists, it would have been much
more strange and worthy of record under the circumstances if he had examined
the spores.

vernicifluus, Tasmania, Berkeley. Type inadequate.

vibecinus, Africa, Fries. No type exists. From the description it is close
to grammocephalus.

virgineus, United States, Schweinitz=conchifer.

virax, India, Berkeley. Types at Upsala seem the same as Liebmanni to
me on comparison, but I am not so certain that it is the same as stereinus.

SECTION MERISMUS.

The section A'lerismus embraces plants that have numerous pilei proceeding
from the branching of a common stem or rootstalk. Some of them form very
large clusters. We also include here the section Conglobatus where the pilei
proceed from a common tubercular core. As a matter of truth the section
Conglobatus is quite different from Merismus in its manner of growth, but
we include it here in order to reduce the number of sectional names.

27. SPORES GLOBOSE, ECHINULATE.

Plants of this section having echinulate, globose spores form a very natural group.

BERKELEYI. — Pilei imbricate, arising from a short, thick stem
or root stalk. Surface pale, dull, slightly tomentose and obscurely
zoned. Context (/^-i inch thick), white becoming isabelline in old
specimens, brittle when dry. Pores large, unequal, white. Spores
globose, 8 mic., distinctly echinulate. This is the largest and a quite
frequent species in the United States, growing usually at the base of
a tree.

MONTANUS. — This is the European analogue of Polyporus
Berkeleyi, and has the same surface, context, spores, and general char-
acter. It is much smaller and simpler and more regular. It is quite
a rare plant in Europe and very few specimens are in the museums.
It occurs in the Alpine regions of France, extending east.

148

SECTION MERISMl'S.

ftps

simiiar »

Fig 449
Merismus Talpae.

TALPAE (Fig. 449). — Pile! very large, forming a clump several
feet in diameter. Surface dark, dull, minutely velutinate, soft to the
touch. Pores in the dried specimen small, cinereous. Spores globose,
hyaline, 8 mic., slightly rough. This is the largest known species of
fleshy Polyporus. A specimen from Dutch Guiana at Leiden measures
7 2/3 feet in circumference. It occurs only as far as known in
Brazil and other parts of northern South America.

149

SECTION MERISMUS.

28. SPORES SMOOTH, HYALINE. PLANTS FLESHY.

UMBELLATUS (Fig. 450). — Stem dividing into many branches,
each bearing a small pileus centrally attached. Flesh white. Pores
decurrent on the branches of the stem, with angular mouths. Spores
3x10, hyaline, smooth. The stem is said to arise from an under-
ground, thickened rootstalk or sclerotium. This is a most striking
and peculiar species and very rare both in Europe and the United
States.

Fig. 450
Merismus umbellatus. (Reduced more than half).

FRONDOSUS. — Pileoli very numerous, imbricate, dimidiate or
spathulate, fuliginous gray, with white, decurrent pores. They proceed
from a common root stalk. This species, which is quite common both
in Europe and the United States, sometimes forms large clusters two
feet in diameter. It usually grows at the base of a tree or stump. It
can be readily known from the more rare species (umbellatus) by
the insertion of the pileoli, though in their general habits they are
very similar.

WYNNEI. — Pileus merismatoid, imbricate, irregular, semi-in-
crusting, and in habits of growth resembles somewhat Thelephora ter-
restris. Upper surface yellowish brown, smooth but uneven, rugulose.
Context thin or a mere pellicle. Pores medium, elongated, round,

150

SECTION MERISMUS.

4 mm. long. Spores globose, 3 mic., hyaline, smooth. When fresh
this is soft and would hardly be sought in Polystictus where it is
placed in our text books. It is quite a rare plant, known from Eng-
land, France, Germany. It is not a true Merismus, but is more close
to this section than any other in its appearance and habits.

Fig. 451
Merismus cremeo-tomentosus

Fig. 452
Merismus Ridleyi.

GIGANTEUS.-Pilei thin, tough with a dark brown surf ac^and
with larger pilei and is tougher.

SECTION MERISMUS.

ANTHRACOPHILUS.— Pilei arising from a hard, woody root-
stalk, flabelliform, tapering at the base. Surface rugulose, dark. Pores
white when fresh. Spores 4x5 subglobose, hyaline, smooth. This
plant is very similar to giganteus in some respects but is smaller and
the dried specimens are hard and subwoody. It is only known from
one or two collections at Kew, from Australia.

CREMEO-TOMENTOSUS (Fig. 451).— Pilei thin, flabelliform,
tapering to the base and proceeding from the apex of a woody root-
stalk, contracted and curved in drying. Surface soft, velutinate.
Pores minute. The entire plant is a pale isabelline color. The sev-
eral pilei proceeding from the apex of a woody rootstalk might be
treated as simple pilei and classed in Section 12. It was described
by Hennings as a Fomes. It never was a Fomes. Known from a
single specimen from Ule, Brazil.

MULTIPLEX. — Pilei numerous, small, imbricate, with very much
the appearance of being small Polyporus frondosus with similar gen-
eral habits and pores. At the base, however, there are numerous white,
mycelial fibrils, and it grew on rotten wood, totally at variance with
the method of growth of frondosus. Known from a single specimen
at Kew from Mueller, Australia, but I believe was not formally pub-
lished.

LITHOPHYLLOIDES. — Only known from the types from Japan at Paris.
They are black now, probably discolored from having been sent in alcohol.
The small, imperfect pilei proceed from a thick, rooting system. It is quite
different in appearance from all others and was compared by the author to
the genus Lithophyllum, which seems to be a genus of seaweed.

29. MERISMUS-POLYSTICTUS. THIN PLANTS HAVING
THE HABITS OF THE SECTION MERISMUS.

RIDLEYI (Fig. 452).— Pileus thin, flabelliform, tapering to the
base and proceeding from a rootstalk. Surface smooth, even, gray
and beautifully zoned. Pores white, rather large, shallow, elongated.
This is a fine species, having the same texture and color and zones
as Section 16, page 134, but is merismatoid in its habits of growth.
Known from one collection at Kew from Tasmania.

COLENSOI. — Pileoli very numerous, much branched and cris-
pid, thin with dark surface. Pores probably white when fresh, large,
shallow. Known from a single rather poor collection at Kew from
New Zealand. In general appearance it resembles Polyporus frondosus
but is much thinner and has smaller pileoli.

FIMBRIATUS (Fig. 453).— Pileus thin, usually imbricate-multi-
plex, but often more simple, variously cut and lobed. Color pale,
dark when dried. Pores white, shallow, usually imperfectly developed
and incomplete, the portions of the undeveloped pore walls resembling'

152

SECTION MERISML'S.

Fig. 453
Merismus fimbriatus with section of the hymenium enlarged.

in a faint degree a Hydnum. Spores ovate, 4x5, hyaline, smooth.
This is a common species in Brazil and abundant specimens have been
sent to Europe, particularly by Glaziou. Owing to the peculiar
hymenium it ha= been variously classed as Polyporus, Polystictus.
Hydnum, Thelephora, Craterellus and J5eccariella,' with a correspond-
ing number of specific names.

3c. MERISMUS CASEOSUS.

I am not sure that the plants listed here are all merismatoid. The common
species of Europe and America, Polyporus sulphureus, when growing at the
base of a stump usually has a common stem or tubercle, but on the side of a
tree it is often sessile, in several imbricate layers. Sometimes on logs it occurs
that it has a single pilei, each with its lateral stem. The feature common to
all the following species is the caseous, brittle flesh, light and crumbling when dry.

SULPHUREUS.— Pileus bright reddish yellow and when in its
prime furnished with a yellowish juice. When old it loses its bright
color and becomes dry, light and crumbling. Pores minute, bright
sulphur yellow when in prime condition. This is a common spinY>
in both Europe and America and occurs in Ceylon, .Mauritius, and
probably many countries. On the oaks where it habitually grows in
Sweden it forms large, conspicuous masses noticeable from a distance.
In the United States a form with a stem is quite common at tin- IUM
of stumps. I have also collected it growing with simple, flabdliform
pilei, each with its own short stem.

153

SECTION MERISMUS.

MINIATUS (Fig. 454).— This is represented at Leiden by the type from
Java also a colored drawing. It is simple, thin, with a short, lateral stipe, and is
brick-red when fresh. It loses its color with age and has the same brittle flesh
and other characters, and I take it to be only a small, simple, thin form of
Polyporus sulphureus.

Fig 454

Merismus (Caseosus) miniatus.

SORDULENTUS.— Named from a single, small collection from Chile.
It has the same habits, texture, context color (of discolored specimens) and
surface, and in my opinion is only a form of Polyporus sulphureus. The pores
are distinctly larger than the European form which, as far as I can note, is
the only real difference.

RETIPORUS. — This from Australia has the appearance of being sulphureus
with larger pores and firmer context. I think it will prove to be only a form.

31. CONGLOBATUS CARNOSUS.

I believe there is no true fleshy species with central core, but that Polyporus
sulphureus rarely takes this form. Such a specimen was distributed collected by
Toldt in Tirol under the name Polyporus imbricatus. I judge it is the same plant
that was named Polyporus flabellatus by Bresadola.

32. CONGLOBATUS FOMES.

But one species of Fomes is known with imbricate pilei proceeding from
a central core. (Cfr. Pol. Issue, p. 43.)

GRAVEOLENS (Fig. 455). — Pilei numerous, densely imbricate
like tiles, on a hard, woody, central core. Context and pores brown
and of a hard, woody texture. Pores minute with darker mouths.
Spores not found by me, but I think are hyaline. A unique species
known only from the United States. It is not common and found only
so far as known on oak or beech.

SECTION MERISMUS.

Fig. 455

Fames graveolen*.
155

SECTION MERISMUS.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

acanthoides, Europe, Bulliard. In the sense of Fries a flabelliform speci-
men of rufescens. In the sense of Bulliard a poor picture of giganteus. Used
as a juggle for giganteus by Quelet.

alligatus, Europe, Fries. Based on Sowerby, t. 422, but no such species
known. The picture probably represents an unusual development of rufescens.

amygdalinus, United States, Berkeley. The type is very poor, so poor I
doubt that it could be recognized on comparison. Said by Ravencl, the collector,
to have a strong odor of vanilla or almond. It does not belong in the section
Merismus.

anax, United States, Cooke. Berkeley's manuscript name for the plant
that had been named Polyporus Berkeleyi. The species was one of Cooke's
posthumous varieties.

Barrelieri, Europe, Viyiani. Plate 28 cited by the author is a good picture
of sulphureus. Plate 36, cited by Fries, is frondosus.

Beatiei, United States, Peck=Berkeleyi.

bonariensis, South America, Spegazzini. Unknown.

botryoides, "incog.," Leveille=Fomes graveolens, which being such an ob-
vious fact, was a long time being found out. I dug the type out of a cup-
board at Paris and at once recognized it.

caespitosa, Brazil, Cooke (as Beccariella)=fimbriatus.

candidus, Europe, Roth. Unknown to me. No illustration. Xo specimens in
museums. Bresadola told me that he considers it a good species, but I only
know what he told me in conversation. I have never seen the plant.

casearius, Europe, Fries. Generally admitted to be only a discolored form
of sulphureus.

Ceratoniae, Europe, Risso. Based on Barla's Icon. t. 30, f. 1-3, which is
surely only sulphureus.

Cincinnatus, United States, Morgan=sulphureus, a bright colored form that
grows in great abundance at the base of stumps, at Preston, Ohio.

conglobatus, United States, Berkeley— graveolens.

discolor, Mauritius, Klotzsch=sulphureus.

eurocephalus, Ceylon, Berkeley. The type is much decayed and full of
globose, strongly asperate, hyaline spores. Teste Petch, these are spores of a
Hypomyces, and in viewing them in that light I think it is correct, though I
had no suspicion of it when I examined it and mistook them for the spores
of the plant.

flabellatus, Europe, Bresadola. From the description I think it is the same
plant as has been distributed from Tirol by Toldt as Polyporus imbricatus. In
my opinion it is an abnormal development of Polyporus sulphureus.

Glaziovii, Brazil, Berkeley. This was included in Cooke's Praecursores
twice, No. 166 and No. 394, the first as a Polyporus, the second as a "Fomes,"
and both with the same citation. The second as a "Fomes" is a Polyporus
(cfr. page 135) and the first as a Polyporus in section Merismus is an illusion
or error of some kind.

Glaziovii (bis), Brazil, Hennings=Talpae.

helopus, Exotic, Patouillard. This is based on a single specimen preserved
in the museums at Paris. It is probably abnormal and surely adventitious and
was found in the Jardin des Plantes.

imbricatus, Europe, Bulliard. Said by Fries to be rare and local in Sweden
and is unknown to any one now. I think it was based on intybaceus that
grew horizontal, hence the lobes are more flat The common plant called
intybaceus in England is surely frondosus. Most modern books carry both, but
I think no one knows two different plants to correspond.

irregularis, England, Sowerby. The Icones 423 was referred to amorphus
by Fries. The color is not right for amorphus. When Berkeley first met
Polyporus Wynnei he referred it to this picture and sent specimens to Mon-
tagne. It has a general resemblance to Wynnei, but Sowerby's mention of
"shallow pores" does not accord.

156

SECTION MERISMUS.

lactifluus, United States, Peck=Berkeleyi.

lobatus, Europe, Hudson. Unknown. Fries cites Schacffer, t. 316 & 317,
which are too crude to even be cited. Although attributed to Hudson, this
plant was never known to English mycologists.

Merrittii, Philippines, Murrill=sordulentus.

multiceps, South America, Patouillard. Unknown to me.

multifida, Portorico, Klotzsch (as Thelephora)=:fimbriatus, testc Bresadola
on a label.

Oleae, Europe, Panizzi. Unknown to any one I think.

Oxyporus, Europe, Sauter. Unknown to any one I think.

Pauletii, Europe, Fries. Based on an old crude figure from which nothing
whatever can be told.

plumarium, Cuba, Berkeley (as Hydnum)=:fimbriatus. Some of the "plumes"
are sterile, proliferous pilei on this particular type specimen. While there are
many specimens of the plant in the museums under many names, I think the
"plumes" are "only known from the type locality."

ramosissimus. An old name often used as a juggle for umbellatus.

ramosus, United States, Schweinitz. Published? Poor specimens, but
authentic, are frondosus.

Rostafinskii, Europe, Blonski. Unknown to me, but the description seems
to be sulphureus.

rttbricus, India, Berkeley. Based on decayed, discolored specimens of sul-
phureus.

scabriusculus, Australia, Berkeley. No type exists.

sparassioides, South America, Spegazzini (as Craterellus)=fimbriatus.

speciosus. An ancient relic of Europe, 1755, alleged to be the same and
used as a cheap juggle for Polyporus sulphureus.

subgiganteus, United States, Berkeley,=Berkeleyi, as Berkeley did not seem
to know his own namesake.

Sumstinei, United States, Murrill,=the common Polyporus giganteus both
of Europe and the United States and which has not the slightest difference
as it grows in either country. I should think Mr. Sumstine would feel quite
proud of the honor.

Todari, Europe, Inzenga=sulphureus.

trichrous, United States, Berkeley. No type exists.

Warmingii, Brazil, Berkeley^fimbriatus.

SECTION SPONGIOSUS.

The section Spongiosus embraces those species with soft, light, spongy flesh.
These characters are more strongly evident in the dried specimens.

33. CONTEXT PALE OR WHITE. SPORES WHITE.

RUFESCENS (Fig. 456).— Pileus soft, spongy, hirsute. Pores
large, daedaloid, pale flesh color when fresh. Spores are globose, 8
mic., hyaline, smooth. Also usually abundant, conidial spores 4x6,
hyaline, smooth, oval. Not rare in Europe and quite variable. When
well developed with a mesopodal stem as shown in Fig. 456 and Per-
soon's Icones Pictae t. 6, often more pleuropodal stem, Sow. t. 191,
or lateral stem or even dimidiate (var. flabelliforme of Persoon). ]
the United States perfect forms occur but very rarely. A distorted
form is more frequent, called Polyporus distortus. The pores of th<
European form are large and daedaloid and in France it is often call
Daedalea biennis. In the United States there is not such a strong
daedaloid tendency. The two following should be held as lorn

157

SECTION SPONGIOSUS.

Fig. 456

Spongiosus rufescens.

HETEROPORUS (Fig. 457).— The flabelliform or dimidiate form of Poly-
porus rufescens. Frequent in Europe. Apparently absent from the United States.

DISTORTUS (Fig. 458.)— A frequent plant in the United States which
I believe to be only a distorted form of Polyporus rufescens. Rarely perfect
forms are also found in the United States.

ANTHELMINTICUS.— A plant said to be used in India as an anthelminthic
is not represented in the museums of Europe by specimens good enough to
tell much about its classification. It was compared to rufescens by Berkeley.

HYSTRICULUS (Fig. 459).— Known from a single specimen
at Kew from Australia, but strongly marked. Surface with rigid,
dense, dark hairs. Flesh white, soft. Pores round, medium, flesh color.
Spores probably conidial, globose, hyaline.

158

SECTION SPONGIOSUS.

Fig 457
Spongiosus heteroporus.

Fig. 458
Spongiosus distortus.

Fig. 459
Spongiosus hystriculus

34. CONTEXT DEEPLY COLORED. SPORES SUPPOSED
TO BE WHITE.

SCHWEINITZIL— Pileus dark brown covered with matted
tomentum. Context brown, soft, spongy when fresh, brittle when
dry. Stipe usually short and thick, rarely central, usually excentric.
sometimes wanting. Pores large at first, meruloid, shallow, becoming
longer, irregular and often lacerate when old. Spores white in mass,
elliptical 4x6, hyaline, smooth. A frequent plant in both Europe and
the United States, but growing usually in pine woods. Sometimes
quite large, one to two feet in diameter.

REPSOLDI. — Described from Brazil as growing on trunks and having a
"gigantic" stem. Spores 5x7, hyaline. Not found by me at Berlin, but tin-
description is close to Schweinitzii except the pores are minute.

PACHYPUS. — Known only from unsatisfactory specimens in tin Herbarium
of Montague. It ame from Cuba and seems to me to be closely related to
Schweinitzii.

35

CONTEXT DEEPLY COLORED. SPORES COLORED

BUT OFTEN BUT FAINTLY.
a. WITH COLORED SETAE ON THE HYMKN'ITM.
CIRCINATUS.— Context thick, spongy, di-i-ply colored. Stipe
mesopodal in the type form, usually pleuropodal. Si-t.-u- curved.
5 159

SECTION SPONGIOSUS.

Spores pale color, /x 12 (or 3 x 5 in the American plant). The type
form which is mesopodal is only known in Europe from Fries' Icones
t. 3. The pleuropodal form occurs but is also rare. In the United
States the mesopodal form is not rare in New England and the pleuro-
podal form is still more common.

TOM ENTOSUS.— Same as the preceding plant but thin, the
upper, spongy context layer being very slightly developed. Same color
and setae. Frequent in the pine woods of Sweden, If it occurs in
central Europe it is rare, and it is unknown from the United States.

The following two are not stipitate, but we mention them here on account of their evident close relationship
to the preceding.

TRIQUETER.— In the sense of Fries (?) and Romell, a thick, sessile form
of circinatus. Same context, color, and setae. It is rare in Europe. In the
original sense of Persoon it is in my opinion the same as cuticularis.

LEPORINUS. — A thin, dimidiate form of the same plant. Rare in Europe
and the United States.

b. SETAE NONE.

SIDEROIDES. — Context ferruginous, spongy. Spores abundant,
colored, globose, 8-9 mic. Stipe in the type form thick, pleuropodal,
spongy. This species is represented at Leiden by several collections
from Java, but not in other museums (except one cotype at Kew).
The most perfect forms have a general resemblance in color and shape
to Polyporus Schweinitzii. Thin forms occur with lateral stipes, and
the type of Polyporus Korthalsii, at Leiden, appears to be a sessile
form.

PUIGGARIANUS. — Context spongy, soft, brown. Spores abun-
dant, conidial, globose, minutely rough. According to the collector's
notes a large, infundibuliform species. Known from a piece of the
pileus at Berlin, from Brazil.

ALBERTINII (Fig. 460).— Pileus mesopodal. with thick, obese
stem. Surface and context, pores and stem concolorous, ferruginous.
Context soft, spongy with large, inflated hyphae. Pores large, angu-
lar, decurrent on the stem. Setae none. Spores abundant, colored,
6x8, smooth. Specimen at Kew from Endeavor River, Australia, re-
ferred by Cooke to Schweinitzii, which it closely resembles in general
appearance. Named for Albertini, who was the tutor of Schweinitz.

AIONTAGNEI. — Pileus obese, ferruginous, with uneven surface.
Pores concolorous, medium large, decurrent. Spores 8 x 10, pale col-
ored, smooth. Setae none. Rare in both the United States and Europe.
This plant is usually placed in the next section, but is rather obese for
the allied plants of that section.

FRAGILISSIMUS. — Context soft, spongy, cinnamon-ferruginous. Pores
concolorous. Spores 3-4 x 4-5, deeply colored, smooth. Stipe mesopodal. Known
only from pieces of the pileus in the herbarium of Montagne from French
Guiana.

1 60

SECTION SPONGIOSUS.

Fig. 460
SponRiosus Alberti

SUB-BULBIPES.— Imperfectly known from a half specimen at Berlin
from Brazil. It has a soft, spongy context and I judge from my photograph
a thin crust. Spores I did not find, but Hennings records them as globose,
3^2-4, light yellow. The plant may belong in Section 5 of Amaurodermus.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

abortivus, United States, Peck=distortus.

acanthoides, Europe. In the sense of Fries=rufescens. In the sense of
Bulliard=poor picture of giganteus.

benquetensis, Philippines, Murrill=circinatus. (?)

biennis, Europe, Bulliard=rufescens. Often called Daedalca hiennis.

conglobatus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown to me, but the description reads
much like distortus.

dualis, United States. Peck. (Also Polyp. Issue, p. 4)=leporinus of Europe.

hispidoides, United States, Peck=Schweinitzii.

holophaeus, Europe, Montagne=Schweinitzii.

Kalchbrenneri, Europe, Fries. Based on small specimen of tomentosus
now labeled perennis through error of R. Fries.

Korthalsii, Java, Leveille. The type specimen appears to be a sessile form
of Polyporus sideroides, same spores, context, texture, and color. In other
namings of Leveille (viz., Zoll. 872) it is Fomes Harkarlii, which has no re-
lations whatever to the type at Leiden.

maximus, Europe, Brotero. No one knows and no one doubts bi
equals Schweinitzii.

Memmingeri, United States, Murrill. Unknown to me. Seems close to
Montagnei.

161

SECTION SPONGIOSUS.

obesus, United States, Ellis (also Polyp. Issue, p. n)— Montagnei.

occultus, Europe, Lasch. I judge from the little co-type frustule I have seen
(Rabh. Exsic. 617) that it is rufescens.

platyporus, India, Berkeley. Type very scanty and inadequate but=I think
rufescens, form heteroporus.

proteiporus, Australia, Cooke='rufescens.

Sahranpurennis, India, Hennings. Not found by me at Berlin, but from
description seems to be Schweinitzii.

scutiger, Europe, Kalchbrenner. Changed by Fries to Kalchbrenneri and
based on small specimens of tomentosus.

sericellus, Europe, Saccardo=rufescens, form heteroporus.

Sistotrema, an old synonym for Schweinitzii, often used as a juggle.

spectabilis, United States, Fries=rSchweinitzii.

spongia, Europe, Fries=Schweinitzii. The only type is at Kew.

tabulaeformis, United States, Berkeley=Schweinitzii.

tubulaeformis, United States, Saccardo, misprint for tabulaeformis.

SECTION PELLOPORUS.

Context dry, ferruginous, or yellowish brown with deeply colored hyphae.
Setae rare. Pores concolorous. Spores colored, pale in most species. Plants
growing in the ground and usually concolorous. Rarely epixylous. This sec-
tion is practically the same as the section Perennes of Fries, but we do not
use the name as it is misleading for the plants are not perennial.

36. PELLOPORUS POLYPORUS. CONTEXT FLESHY,

TOUGH, RATHER BRITTLE, MOSTLY MORE

OBESE THAN THE NEXT SECTION.

INDICUS (Fig. 461). — Pileus rugulose, dark brown, zonate.
Flesh 5 mm. thick, pale rhubarb color. Hyphae deep yellow. Stipe
mesopodal, subligneous, irregular. Pores small, round, 5-8 mm. long,
darker than the context with pale mouths. Spores abundant, globose,
5 mic., smooth, deeply colored, mostly guttulate. Known from speci-
men sent me by B. S. Cavanagh, Baroda, India.

CUMINGII. — Context thin. Pores minute, 2 mm. long, concol-
orous. Stipe slightly spongy. Spores 3~3/4, pale colored. Plant
mesopodal. Only known from types at Kew from Philippines (also
Mexico?).

VAIXATUS (Berkeley). — Context thick, subligneous, bright
color. Surface dull, concolorous. Pores small. Known from two
specimens at Kew from India. One seems pleuropodal, the other
mesopodal.

The two following are much smaller than those that precede, but the rigid,
brittle flesh more closely allies them than to the next section.

LUTEO-NITIDUS (Fig. 462).— Pileus irregular, mesopodal or
pleuropodal. Stipe slightly spongy, often long rooting. Context thin.
Pores minute. Very similar but a larger species than the next. Seems
frequent in tropical South America.

162

SECTION PELUH '<>krs.

Fig. 461
Pelloporus indicus. (Top of pileus). Reduced

Fig. 462
Pelloporus luteo-nitidus.

Fig 463
Pelloporus multiformis.

MULTIFORMIS (Fig. 463).— Stipe lateral, rooting. Pileus
flabelliform. thin. Surface striate. Spores 3 x 4. colored. Very sim-
ilar in color and habits to preceding and in the same region. It is
smaller and not disposed to take mesopodal forms. Known from three
collections all at Paris. It may he only small forms of the previous.
' 163

SECTION PELLOPORUS.

37. PELLOPORUS POLYSTICTUS. CONTEXT THIN,
FLEXIBLE.

Small plants growing in the ground with mesopodal stems. This is the old section Perennes of Fries.

a. COLOR DULL CINNAMON.

PERENNIS.- — The most frequent species of the section in both
Europe and the United States. Known from its dull, zonate, cinna-
mon color. Pores small. Spores 4-5 x 8-10, pale colored.

FOCICOLA. — Very similar to the preceding species but with
larger pores (i mm. or more). Frequent in the southern United States
and there replaces the perennis of the northern states. Unknown from
Europe.

DECURRENS. — A rare plant if not a form, based on one collection, from
Massachusetts (Cfr. Pol. Issue, p. 12).

PICTUS. — It is a little, slender species known only from specimen in the
Herbarium of Fries. It has very thin context, }/> mm., pores 2 mm. long, and
the color now is black. Distinct but rare. Spores 6x8. The reference Bulliard
No. 254 is an error as also are the French records of this plant.

b. COLOR BRIGHT, FERRUGINOUS CINNAMON.
CINNAMOMEUS.— A uniformly bright colored plant with silky,
shining, appressed, radiating fibrils. Very rare in Europe, more fre-
quent in the United States. Pores small. Spores 5-6x7-10, pale
colored under the microscope. The forms from Ceylon and India are
otherwise the same but have more globose spores, 6-7 x 8.

OBLECTANS. — The Australian plant (and it is evidently very common
in Australia) differs from the European in having usually larger pores and
more erect fibrils on the pileus. Spores are 5x8, pale. The color is the same
and the plants have been held to be the same, but I feel that the Australian
plant is entitled to a name.

OBLECTABILIS (Fig. 464).— This, which is based on speci-
mens collected in Brazil, distributed by Ule (No. 48) has been referred
to oblectans of Australia. It is similar in color but is more slender,
has larger, more shallow pores. The margin is thin and fimbriate
and the spores more narrow and more pointed. The spores are 4 x 10,
pale colored and tapering at one end.

OBLIVIONIS (Fig. 465).— Entire plant unicolor, of a bright
cinnamon color. Pileus soft, subzonate, appressed, fibrillose. Con-
text thin, less than i mm. Pores minute, 2 mm. deep. Stipe slender,
3-4 mm. thick, soft tomentose, 7 to 10 cm. long. Spores abundant,
elliptical, 7-8 x 10-12 mic., colored. This is a beautiful species known
from one collection at Kew from Brazil. It is much larger than any
other brightly colored species of this section.

164

SECTION PELLOPORUS.

Fig. 464
Pelloporus oblectabilis.

Fig. 465
Pelloporus oblivionis.

CUTICULARIS. — Pileus very thin with large, long pores, and
was published in Pol. Issue page n, and has since been received from
the same locality. It is a very rare species of the New England States.
It is badly named as it is liable to be confused with Polyporus etitiYu-
laris, to which it has no resemblance.

DEPENDENS. — A most curious little species which hang> pen-
dant from the under side of logs somewhat in the manner of a wasp's
nest. Entire plant bright cinnamon color. Spores colored. 5 x 7. It
is very rare in the United States.

See Polyporous hamatus. Addenda, p. 195.

(Polyporus Montagnei, see Section 35, is a thicker, more obese plant than others of this wtion. but
its relations are undoubtedly closer here than where we have placed it . I

165

SECTION PELLOPORUS.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

bulbipes, Australia, Fries. No type exists=oblectans, teste Fries, but he
claimed to have named it in manuscript first.

carbonarius, Europe, Fries. Based on an old picture (Micheli) and un-
known. Said to have white pores, hence can not belong in this section.

Cladonia, Australia, Berkeley. Types very young=oblectans, young, I think.

connatus, United States, Schweinitz— perennis.

connatus, United States, most writers, =focicola.

Ehrenreichii, Brazil, Hennings. Type inadequate.

Euphprbiae, China, Patouillard. Unknown to me.

fimbriatus, Europe, Bulliard=perennis.

parvulus, British Columbia, Klotzsch=cinnamomeus.

parvulus, United States, most authors=focicola.

perdurans, Tasmania, Kalchbrenner. Nothing authentic has been seen by
me, but the determinations at Berlin are oblectans.

peronatus, Europe, Schulzer. Only known from a drawing, showing a
volva (sic) surely inaccurate.

proliferus, United States, Lloyd. Something abnormal.

Salpincta, New Zealand, Cooke. Types inadequate. Probably an abnormal
oblectans. The illustration in the Handbook is largely made up.

saxatilis, Europe, Britzelmayr. It is purely a waste of time to bother with
his work.

scutellatus, Siberia, Borszczow. Seems from the description to be focicola
which, however, is not known excepting in America.

scutiger, Europe, Kalchbrenner. Changed by Fries to Kalchbrenneri. It
was based on a small specimen of tomentosus.

simillimus, United States, Peck. At best a form of perennis, but it is
not possible to maintain it even as a form.

spathulatus, South America, Hooker. Type in two little fragments. It is
probably the same as multiformis.

splendens, United States, Peck=cinnamomeus.

subsericeus, United States, Peck— cinnamomeus.

Verae-crucis, Mexico, Cooke. Known from but one collection from Mexico
which I think on comparison is the same as Polyporus Cumingii, known only
from the Philippines.

SECTION OVINUS.

In the section Ovinus we give very scanty accounts, as the section has been
recently considered and illustrated in full by us in a separate pamphlet. Ovinus
embraces the thick, fleshy species of Polyporus with mesopodal or pleuropodal
or rarely lateral stems.

38. WITH SCLEROTIUM.

TUBERASTER. — Sclerotium (false) of earth, agglutinate with
mycelium. Pores small, white. In Italy, Switzerland.

GOETZII. — Sclerotium small, 2-3 inches. Plant mesopodal.
Known from one specimen at Berlin from Africa.

SAPUREMA. — Sclerotium large, bearing several plants. Speci-
men in alcohol at Berlin from Brazil.

166

SECTION OVINUS.

MYLITTAE. — Sclerotium, the well known "native bread" of Aus-
tralia. In the museums I have visited there are no specimens with
the fruit, but a photograph of a sclerotium with the 1'olyporus is at
the British Museum.

39. STIPE USUALLY MESOPODAL. PORES SMALL.

OVINUS. — White. Pores small. Spores 3^-4. Common in
Sweden and is also found in Alpine regions of central Europe. Its
record in the United States is not certain.

LEUCOMELAS. — Pileus fuliginous. Pores pale. Spores tuber-
cular. Rare in Europe. Not known from the United States.

GRISEUS. — Pileus and pores smoky gray. Spores tubercular.
Frequent in the United States. Rare in Europe.

CAERULIPORUS.— Pileus and pores bright blue when in prime.
Brown when dry. Very rare in the United States.

POLITUS. — Color dark reddish. Very rare in Europe. Only known from
Fries' Icones and a specimen at Kew. Possibly it is a small mesopodial form
of confluens.

Peckianus, cfr. Lentus, p. 171.

40. STIPE CENTRAL. PORES LARGE.

(Compare tuberaster in 38.)

41. STIPE USUALLY EXCENTRIC OR IRREGULAR.
PORES SMALL.

CRISTATUS.— Color greenish yellow. Frequent in the United
States. Rare in Europe.

CONFLUENS.— Color pale reddish, becoming deeper red in dry-
ing. Often confluent and irregular. Frequent in Europe and eastern
United States.

DISCOIDEUS.— White, becoming isabelline in drying. Grows
on logs. Brazil and the type from Cuba.

POPANOIDES.— White or yellowish when dry. No distinct
cuticle. With short, thick stipe near one side. Known only fi
collection from Mauritius at Kew.

42. STIPE EXCENTRIC. PORES LARGE.
PES CAPRAE— Surface with small, fasciculate scales. Alpine
regions and southern Europe. Very rare in the United States.

167

SECTION OVINUS.

ELLISII. — Pale yellow with large floccose scales. Very rare in
the southern United States.

SQUAMATUS.— With large scales. Dark reddish when dry.
Known from one collection from Hungary at Berlin.

(Cfr. Boucheanus in next section.)

43. MELANOPUS. PORES LARGE.

SQUAMOSUS.— Pileus scaly. Pores favoloid. Stipes usually
excentric. Common in Europe, rare in the United States.

ROSTKOVIJ. — Smooth form of squamosus. Rare in Europe and the
United States.

BOUCHEANUS. — Small, smoothish form of squamosus with uncolored
stipes. Rare in Europe.

LENTINOIDES. — Tropical, smooth form of squamosus.

TUMULOSUS. — Pileus with a smooth, thin cuticle, recalling
betulinus. Stipe short, central. Supposed to form large, mycelial
masses. Known from the type at Kew from Australia.

TASMANICUS. — Pileus turbinate. Stipe short. Known from
one collection from Tasmania at Kew.

44. MELANOPUS. PORES SMALL.

RADICATUS (Fig. 465 bis.).— Mesopodal with a long, rooting
base. Not rare in the United States.

HARTMANNI. — Brown, velutinate, with short, thick, excentric
stipe. Two collections from Australia at Kew.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

alpinus, Europe, Sauter. From the description seems to be Rostkowii.

asprellus, Europe, Leveille. Based on a crude figure of Pes caprae.

bulbipes, Europe, Beck. Known only from an illustration and is probably
the same as Boucheanus. Spores seem a little different, but that is all.

cadaverinus, Europe, Schulzer. Some abnormality.

Campbelli, India, Berkeley. Type is inadequate.

caudicinus. A cheap juggle of Polyporus squamosus. It originated in
Europe, but has been copied in the United States.

Clusianus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Unknowable.

decurrens, United States, Underwood. Unknown.

Earlei, United States, Underwood=griseus.

flavo-squamosus, United States, Underwood=Ellisii.

flavo-virens, United States, Berkeley=cristatus.

Forquignoni, Europe, Quelet=Boucheanus.

fuligineus, Europe, Fries. Unknown, based on an old figure.

holocyaneus, United States, Atkinson=caeruliporus.

Kansensis, United States, Ellis. Not seen by me, but is probably Polyporus
melanopus.

168

Fig. 465 bis.
Ovinus radicatus (reduced about one-fourth). Pore detail* natural i

169

SECTION OYINUS.

laeticolor, United States, Murrill. Preoccupied. Changed to luteo-luteus
by McGinty.

luteo-luteus, United States, McGinty. Unknown to me.

Michelii, Europe, Fries. Unknown, based on an old figure.

Morganii, United States, Peck=radicatus.

myclodes, Australia, Kalchbrenner. Unknown.

nodipes, India, Berkeley. No type exists.

novo-guineensis, New Guinea, Hennings. Nondescript.

olivaceo-fuscus, Ceylon, Berkeley. Type consists of two sections from
which nothing can be told. It is probably a young Boletus.

pallidus, Europe, Schulzer^squamosus with small scales.

poripes, United States, Fries. Unknown. No type exists.

pseudoboletus, South America, Spegazzini. Unknown.

punctiporus, Europe, Britzelmayr. All of his species are unrecognizable.

retipes. United States, Underwood=Pes caprae.

Schweinfurthianus, Africa, Hennings. Not a Polyporus but a Boletus.

scobinaceus, Europe. Used as a juggle for tuberaster.

subradicatus, United States, Murrill. Probably='radicatus, which the author
does not seem to know very well.

subsquamosus, Europe, Linnaeus. Unknown. Probably=griseus.

tessulatus, Europe, Fries. Unknown. Based on an old picture.

violaceo-maculatus, China, Patouillard. Unknown to me.

virellus, Europe, Fries. Based on picturc=cristatus sans doubt.

viscpsus, Europe, Persoon. Not a Polyporus but a Boletus.

Whiteac, United States, Murrill. Unknown to me.

xoilopus, Europe, Rostkovius. Unknown except from a doubtful picture.

SECTION LENTUS.

This section generally has mesopodial stipes. They are thinner, more pliant,
or coriaceous than the section Ovinus. Also they are mostly epixylous in
habitat. All as far as known have pale context hyphae and white spores.

45. LENTUS. PORES SMALL.

a. WHITE.

TRICHOLOMA (Fig. 466).— White, strongly marked with ciliate
hairs on the margin when young, but they are detersive. Pileius de-
pressed in the center. Spores 4x6, hyaline, smooth. Frequent in
tropical America.

CRYPTOPUS (Fig. 467).— Growing attached to grass stems in
western United States. Similar to rhizophilus of Tunis, but has smaller
pores and spores.

CORYLINUS. — Only known from illustration (Viv. t. i) from Italy, but
seems very distinct.

LEPTOCEPHALUS.— Only known from an old illustration (Jacq. Misc. i,
t. 12) but seems quite characteristic. In short, it is elegans without a black stipe,
(albiceps, see page 180. Specimens with uncolored stems would be sought here.)

b. GRAYISH OR FULIGINOUS BROWN.

BRUMALIS. — Stipe and pileus fuliginous. Pores small but elon-
gated, white. Common both in Europe and the United States, on
branches, late in the season.

170

SECTION LENT I 'S.

Fig. 466

Lentus tricholoma. With section enlarged, showing marginal hairs.

Fig. 467
Lentus cryptopus.

CILIATUS. — Very close to brumalis but lighter color and more
slender and grows often attached to buried sticks. It is rare in
Europe.

LEPIDEUS. — Close to brumalis but of a different color, pale
yellowish, fuliginous. Very rare in Europe, known only on birch.

SCABRICEPS. — Known from one specimen at Kew from Cuba.
Close to brumalis but has more scabrous pileus. Still it is not well
named.

GUARANITICUS.— Close to brumalis as to shape and size.
Close to lepideus as to color, but the pores are small and round.

VERNALIS. — Close to brumalis but more slender and yellmvMi.
Rare in Europe and only known to me from the figure by (Juelet.

UMBILICATUS. — Close to brumalis but more smooth and r'ujid.
Known from the type at Kew from India. I have also a specimen
from India from Rev. Theissen.

c. COLOR YELLOW OR REDDISH RROWX.

FUSCIDULUS.— Rare, and the only collection known is in
Cooke's herbarium and was collected in England. Figured by Bolton
(t. 170). When fresh seems to have white flesh and yellow pores.

PECKIANUS.— Pileus thin, infundibuliform. with a central stem.
Pale yellow when fresh as are the small pores. Grows in the ground,
hence might be sought in Ovinus. but is too thin for that section.

171

SECTION LENTUS.

Fig. 468

Lentus virgatus

VIRGATUS (Fig. 468). — Known from one abundant collection
from Cuba. The type is at Kew. Pileus of peculiar reddish brown
color and appressed fibrils. Context and pores also reddish brown.

SUB VIRGATUS. — A plant of India very close to virgatus of the
American tropics as to color, shape, and size, but is devoid of the
virgate fibrils and the pores are not at all irregular.

IRINUS.— Known to me only from the figure (Bull. Myc. France, 1888,
t. XII). Seems to be a reddish plant with a zonate pileus.

REPANDO-LOBATUS.— Specimen at Paris which is very close to virgatus
and endorsed by Patouillard on the label as same, but which seems to me to be
a little different.

Unknown to me Except from Description.

Guarapiensis, South America,
pauperculus. South America,
tucumanensis, South America,
fuegianus, South America.
Braziliensis, South America.
dictyoporus; West Indies,
depressus, South America.

172

SECTION LENTUS.

d MICROPORUS. THIN, RIGID WITH MINUTE, WHITE PORES IN
A VERY THIN LAYER. COLOR REDDISH BAY OR SIENNA
BROWN.

A natural section (or perhaps one species) which runs also to forms with
lateral stems (Cfr. page 142). (See also Synopsis of Microporus section pub-
lished, 1910.)

XANTHOPUS (Fig. 469).— Stipe smooth, yellow. Pileus
smooth. A very common species, particularly in Africa, but it occurs
also in the East in general. It seems to be absent from the American
tropics.

FLORIDEUS.— At best only a dark form of xanthopus with a short stipe.

Fig. 469
Lentus xanthopus.

CONCINNUS.-Stem slender, b.ack. PUeus
form, fine, downy, velvety pubescence.

INCOMPTUS.-Stem dark or black. PUeus with pubescent
zones. This appears to be a common form ,n A nca and ,s , q

173

SECTION LENTUS.

PSEUDO-PERENNIS.— Stipe dark or black. Pileus densely
covered with appressed pubescence, faintly zoned, with narrow,
glabrous zones. Known from a single collection at Berlin from Africa.
Though the plant has no relations, it has a general resemblance to
Polystictus perennis.

46. PORES LARGE.

Some of these might be placed in Favolus to probably better
classification.

a. WHITE.

FAVOLOIDES (Fig. 470). — Known only from one specimen
from Africa, in alcohol at Berlin. A very marked species with thin,
white, umbilicate pileus, long, slender stem, and large, white, favoloid
pores.

Fig. 470 Fig. 471 Fig. 472

Lentus favoloides. Lentus partitus. Lentus nanus.

NANUS (Fig. 472). — Known from one collection from Algeria
at Paris. A little species growing in the sand. Spores are globose,
4-5, hyaline, smooth. Color seems to me to have been white though
described as pale yellowish.

RHIZOPHILUS.— Collected by Patouillard. Common in Tunis,
attached to grass culms. Very similar to cryptopus of the United
States but has larger pores and spores.

174

SECTION LEX'IVS.

Flo. 473
Lentus Marmellosens

Fig. 474
Lentus orbicularis.

PARTITUS (Fig. 471). — Pileus thin, mesopodal and usually more
or less parted or lobed, reddish brown, rigid. Pores thin, large, shallow
with thin walls, white. Stipe mesopodal, lateral from the imperfect
formation of the pileus, slender, dull, dark surface. Known from sev-
eral collections from Spruce. Brazil, at Kew. also one collection at
Berlin.

b. COLOR BRIGHT YKI.LOW.

TILIAE.— Known only from Iconcs, Kalchbrcnncr, t. 38. All parts of the
plant are bright yellow. Very peculiar if correctly depicted, but probably an
exaggeration or imagination of some kind, as the author was much given to
drawing imaginary pictures. No such plant is now known in Kumpr.

r. COLOR BROWN OR BROWNISH.

ARCULARIUS. — Pores large, favoloid. white. Pileus brownish.
often infundibulform, more or less scaly. A widely distributed plant
6 175

SECTION LENTUS.

in most countries of the world. In the United States it is common in
the spring. In Europe it is of a southern range only. Frequent in
the tropics.

SPECIES WHICH ARE CLOSE IF NOT THE SAME AS ARCULARIUS.

squamiger (as Fayolus), Australia.

cremoricolor, India.

aemulans, Cuba.

maculatus, India.

tunetanus Algeria. Placed in Mcknopus, but I think belongs here.

arculariellus, United States. The late summer form of areularius.

arculariformis, United States.

CILIARIS (as Favolus) (Fig. 475). — This plant occurs in tropical America
and is very close to Polyporus tricholoma but with much larger pores and
close to Polyporus areularius, but with smaller pores. It was distributed by Ule
as a variety of Polyporus tricholoma.

ORBICULARIS (Fig. 474). — Known to me from one collection
at Berlin made in that vicinity, referred by Hennings to Boucheanus
but surely not that. It has a sublateral stipe and large, favoloid pores.
It seems to answer the description, but of course that is only a guess.

LENTUS. — Very much the same as areularius excepting its color
which is paler and the plant is more tough. Formerly collected, ap-
parently in abundance, on old stems of gorse (Ulex) in England, but
not in recent years. Recorded in error from the United States.

MARMELLOSENSIS (Fig. 473).— Known from but one speci-
men from Brazil at Berlin, which is most peculiar. Thin, dark, red-
dish brown with large, white, round pores. So thin it might be sought
in Polystictns or really in Hexagona from its pore shapes. It is the only
similar plant known.

(Boucheanus, see Ovinus, page 168, probably better classed here.)
LENTUS SPECIES UNKNOWN TO ME AND NOT FIGURED.

Incendiarius.— Smooth, white, said to be "copious" in Russia, but unknown in the museums of
Europe.

Penningtonia. South America.

Velutipes, China. Said to have a viscid pileus and contorted pores.

Fagicola. United Slates. Known only from the type locality.

Variiporus, West Indies. Said to resemble Tricholoma, but has large pores.

47. LENTUS. SUBGELATINOUS WHEN FRESH (TEND-
ING TOWARD LASCHIA.)

GRACILIS. — Smooth, reddish brown, small pores, with smooth,
reddish stem. When fresh it is subgelatinous. Several collections are
known, all from tropical America. Original at Kew from the West
Indies. The color of the dried specimens is reddish brown, but we
suspect that when fresh it is white.

FORM.— We have from Rev. Rick of Brazil a collection which we think
is the same species as the preceding but with notably larger pores.

176

SECTION LEXTUS.

48. LENTUS. ABERRANT SPECIES AS TO SHAPE. IN-
FUNDIBULIFORM, GIBBOUS, OR VERY MINUTE.

CRATERELLUS. — Infundibuliform, brown now. described as
white or yellow, and it may have been white. Spores abundant, 4 x 5,
hyaline, smooth. Only known from original collection at Kew from
Cuba.

CONFUSUS (Fig. 476). — In shape, size, and color apparently
the same as the preceding' and so originally determined. Spores 3-4 x
12-14. Known from a collection from Louisiana, sent by Ellis to Kew.

Fig. 476

Lentus confusus.

Fig. 477
Lentus Tuba.

Fig. 478

Lentus acicula
(enlarged six time*).

TUBA (Fig. 477). — Peculiar, gibbous shape which has been in-
accurately described as cup-shaped. Known only from the original
collection at Kew from Cuba.

ACICULA (Fig. 478).— If it is a Polyponis. and I can not say it
is not, it is unique in its small size, not much larger than a pin
and known from a single specimen from Cuba at Kew.

177

SECTION LENTUS.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AND UNKNOWN SPECIES.

agriceus, Ceylon, Berkeley— arcularius as Berkeley himself referred.

alveolarius, United States, Bosc. Figure is a crude representation of arcu-
larius.

apalus, Brazil, Berkeley:=gracilis.

Armitii, Australia, Cooke. No type exists. It was figured in Grevillea but
I do not know as to its accuracy. Referred afterwards to stipitarius, but that
surely was an error if the figure at all represents it.

bataviensis, Java, Holtermann. From the figure I judge it is Laschia
caespitcsa.

Binnendykei, Java, Cooke. No specimen exists. Based on an old drawing,
probably pale arcularius.

cachoeriacensis, Brazil, Hennings=partitus.

callochrous, Leveille. Neither specimen nor locality known.

clypeatus, South America, Patouillard (as Laschia) =gracilis.

collybioides, Australia, Kalchbrenner. Type inadequate.

Columbiensis, United States, Berkeley. Oregon, not South Carolina as in-
accurately compiled by Mr. Murrill. The type is a little discolored frustule that
tells nothing and which should never have been named.

conspicabilis, Europe, Britzelmayr. Not worth the trouble of bothering
with his crude cartoons.

Cowelli, West Indies, Murrill. From the description I judge it is the same
as gracilis, which the author does not seem to know although there is a good
type at Kew.

crassipes, India, Curry=xanthopus.

cupreo-nitens, Australia, Kalchbrenner=xanthopus.

Curtisii, United States, Berkeley (as Favolus), a late form of arcularius,
changed to arculariellus by Murrill.

cyathiformis, Leveille, West Indies. No type exists. Probably the same as
Polyporus craterellus.

dibaphrus, United States, Berkeley=brumalis.

esculentus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Cartoon.

favularis, East Indies, Fries. No type exists.

flavidus (bis), United States, Peck. Changed to Peckianus.

rlexipes, Brazil, Fries. No type exists. Supposed by Fries to be the same
as gracilis, but I have little doubt it was the same as Polyporus Tricholoma.

floccopus, Europe, Rostkovius. Seems from the crude picture to be the
same as lentus.

fuligineo-albus, Europe, Trog. Unknown to me.

hapalus, Brazil, Saccardo. A variant spelling of apalus.

Humphreyi, West Indies, Hennings. No specimen in the cover at Berlin,
but said by Murrill to be the same as Polyporus Tricholoma. Whether he
saw it or merely guessed at it he does not state.

Katui, Marshall Island, Ehrenberg=xanthcpus. It was finely illustrated
under the name Katui and on its merits this name should be used.

luridus, United States, Berkeley=brumalis.

meizoporus, Cuba, Berkeley (in Saccardo as a variety of stipitarius). I
find no type.

melanocephalus, Japan, Patouillard. Type small and inadequate. Probably
discolored by alcohol.

Mildbachii (Mss. at Berlin), Africa,=concinnus.

mycenoides, New Caledonia. Patouillard=Laschia caespitosa.

obolus, Central America, Ellis. I have not seen this, but the description
indicates gracilis.

obscura, China, Kalchbrenner. Unknown. Probably arcularius.

paraguayensis, South America, Spegazzini. Same as guarapiensis, but more
pleuropodal.

Ferula, Africa, Palisot. Picture probably represents deformed specimen of
xanthopus.

I78

SECTION LENTl'S.

phaeoxanthus, United States, Montage. Type is a nu-re fn,,tulc (cfr.
iViyc. 1\ otcs, p. 4Q2J.

pisiformis, Australia Kalchbrenncr. "Type" is a little incipient sessile,
undeveloped pad about the size and appearance of a wart. Should ,H-VIT ha
been named at all and most certainly should never have been put in the section
Lentus of stipitatc fungi where Cookc placed it.

planus, Europe, Wallroth. Unknown. As it grew in the ground it mav
not belong to the section Lentus.

platensis, South America, Spegazzini. Unknown.

Polyporus Polyporus. This gibberish sounds to me more like the college
yell of the Carlisle Indians than "Latin," but is alleged to lie a Latin name
for Polyporus brumalis. I doubt if a Roman barmaid would have been guilty of
employing such silly language, and yet men who claim to be "scientific" have the
assurance to go into print with such names under the pretext that they are
employing Latin.

Puiggarii, Brazil, Spcgazzini. Unknown.

quadrans, Australia, Berkeley. Xo type exists, From the description it
seems to be xanthopus.

rubripes, Europe, Rostkovius. Known only from an old picture which is
probably inaccurate.

rubro-maculatus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Cartoon.

saccatus, Rawak, Persoon=rxanthopus.

similis, Brazil, Berkeley. Type very scanty but probably = Polyporus Tricho-
loma.

squamoso-maculatus, India, Saccardo. Change of maculatus of Berkeley
because Peck, twenty years later, published another under the same name.
Berkeley's name does not seem to have needed changing very badly on this
account.

stipitarius, Cuba, Berkeley=Polyporus Tricholoma.

substriatus, Europe, Rostkovius. Only known from an old illustration which
appears to me to be the same as lepideus.

tubarius, Europe, Quelet. Unknown except from his figure, which seems
too close to vernalis.

umbilicatus, Java, Junghuhn— arcularius, teste Fries. I'resadnla claims it
is different from arcularius, but by such slight structural differences that I can
not grasp them. The types at Leiden I should refer to arcularius.

Vossii, Europe, Kalchbrenncr— brumalis, teste Bresadola.

Weddelii, Brazil, Montagne. No type exists.

Zenkeri, Africa, Hennings. No specimens found at Berlin. Seems from
description to be pale xanthopus.

Zollingeri, Java, Saccardo. Unknown and unknowable from such descrip-
tions.

179

SECTION MELANOPUS.

Plants that have black stems are called Melanopus, but we include in this
section only those with pilei that would be classed as Lentus. The soft, fleshy
species are included in Ovinus, Sections 43 and 44. Others with black stems
will be found in Section Petaloides, Section 23, and in Microporus. Section 45d.

49. STIPE PLEUROPODAL OR CENTRAL, RARELY LAT-
ERAL. PORES MINUTE.

VARIUS. — Pores very minute, white. Piletis dark bay to almost
black, smooth. Flesh firm. Type form is common in Europe and it
occurs under varying forms in many countries. The following eight
could easily be considered as forms.

ALBICEPS. — Pileus white, smooth, with firm, compact, white
flesh. Pores very minute, white, decurrent. Stem mesopodal, white,
rarely slightly black at the very base. The stem is not always black
at the base hence the plant may not be sought for in this section. Its
firm flesh, small pores, and other characters bring it very close to
Polyporus varius even if occasional specimens were not found show-
ing a "black stem." The plant is rare in the United States.

ELEGANS. — This has all the characters of varius except the
small size which is so constant that on this one character it is generally
held to be a good species.

PICIPES. — Name applied to the black form of varius with more velvety
stems. Frequent in England. In the United States this name is applied to a
thin dark form of varius.

LEPRODES. — A deformed, irregular, submerismatoid form of.varius. Rare
in Europe and the United States. Given in Fries as a variety of Polyporus
melanopus.

ADMIRABILIS. — A large, white, thick plant with a rudimentary stem.
Very different from varius in some features but very close in the essentials.
Rare, and occurs in the extreme eastern part of the United States.

BLANCHETIANUS, — For me this is a tropical, reduced form of varius.
Short stem, small size, but in all essential characters it is the same as varius.

DICTYOPUS.— For me the tropical form of picipes-varius. Color black
and it is smaller than the form of temperate regions. Usually known as in-
fernalis of Berkeley which is the same thing. Widespread in tropical countries,
Brazil, Africa, Ceylon.

PAUCHERI (Fig. 482).— A form of the preceding with striate pileus.
Common in Australia and at Kew it is referred to infernalis.

MELANOPUS. — Pileus villose or rarely scaly. Growing in the
ground attached to buried sticks by which habits it can be told from
varius which usually grows on trunks or decayed spots of living trees.
Rather rare in both Europe and the United States.

180

SECTION MELANOPUS.

Fig. 479

Melanopus Rhizomorphus.

Fig. 480

lelanopus veluticeps.

Fig. 481
Melanopus Lepreuri

Fig. 482
Melanopus Paucheri.

181

SECTION MELANOPUS.

Fig 483

Melanopus rubrocastaneus.

Fig. 484

Melanopus hemicapnodes

Fig. 485
Melanopus Guyanensis (with pores enlarged X6).

RHIZOMORPHUS (Fig. 479).— Produced by long, black, woody
rhizomes which I judge are aerial. Known from abundant material
in Montagne's herbarium from tropical America.

VERNICOSUS.— Mesopodal, black. Quite peculiar structure,
having the dark hyphae prolonged into protruding pointed setae in
the pores. Known from a single specimen at Kew from Brazil.

VELUTICEPS (Fig. 480).— Quite different from all others of
this section, the pileus having the general appearance and color of
Polystictus perennis. Stem black, spores doubtless white. Not re-
lated to perennis however. Known from one collection from Africa
at Kew.

HEMICAPNODES (Fig. 484).— Slender, smooth, sometimes in-
fundibuliform at first. The slender, black stipe is sometimes meso-
podal and lateral in the same collection. Originally from Ceylon,
common in Samoa and seems to occur in the East generally.

182

SECTION MELANOPUS.

LEPRIEURII (Fig. 481).— Entire plant including the minute
pores is dark, fuliginous. Stipe mesopodal or in most of the speci-
mens lateral. Known from very abundant collections sent Montagne
from French Guiana.

HYDNICEPS.— Stipe short, rudimentary but black. The "hyd-
noid" processes of the pileus from which the plant was named are much
exaggerated. Known from three apparently undeveloped specimens
at Kew, from Cuba. I should not be surprised if it develops into the
section Merisma when it is well known.

RUBRO-CASTANEUS (Fig. 483).— Stem short, black, meso-
podal. Pileus infundibuliform, reddish brown, smooth. Pores small,
decurrent. Hyphae pale colored. Spores not found. This is the only
truly infundibuliform species with black stem. The pileus is the same
peculiar reddish color as Polyporus virgatus. Specimens from Malacca
(Malay) at Kew.

50. STIPE PLEUROPODAL OR CENTRAL. PORES
MEDIUM.

GUYANENSIS (Fig. 485). — Slender with a dark, slender stipe.
Pores white, medium, favoloid in shape. Seems to be frequent in
tropical America.

PODLACHICUS.— Unknown to me, but described as similar to elegans
but larger pores. Rare in Europe, no doubt.

51. STIPE PLEUROPODAL OR CENTRAL. PORES LARGE.
FAVOLOID.

(Probably all better classed in the genus Favolus.)

PUTTEMANSII (Fig. 486).— Pileus white, with (lull, smooth
surface. Pores large, favoloid, white. Stipe all black. Known from
a half specimen at Berlin from Brazil. I have also a specimen from
Rev. Rick.

\YRIGHTII (Fig. 487).— Pileus white with striate surface.
Pores large white. Stipe mesopodal black, abruptly enlarged at the
base. Type from Cuba (Wright 201) but not found at Kew r
cited by Berkeley. Known to me from a specimen from Kcv. I
Brazil, which seems to accord with the description, but c
can not say that it is correct.

V ADO SUS.— Pileus rigid, pale, with smooth or slightly virgate
pileus. Stipe mesopodal, black, with a rooting base,
favoloid shallow. Based on a specimen at Berlin, colUrtc-l in ( ,ua
lupe by Duss and determined, evidently in error, as "Favolus <ler
porus, Pers." This may be the same as marasmioides. winch is un-
known to me.

183

SECTION MELANOPUS.

Fig. 486

Melanopus Puttemansii

Fig. 487

Melanopus Wrightii.

Fig. 488

Melanopus palpebralis.

PALPEBRALIS (Fig. 488).— Pileus dark, thin, with a minutely
tomentose surface. Margin ciliate with short hairs. Pores dark,
favoloid. Stipe mesopodal, slender, black. Based on a specimen at
Paris from French Guiana, labeled by Montague "ciliaris vel affinis."
It is close to ciliaris but differs in its dark color and black stipe.

MARASMIOIDES. — Not seen by me, but it seems peculiar in its slender
form and habitat (seed of Melioma). Perhaps it is the same as vadosus.

184

SECTION MELANOirs.

53. STZPE LATERAL,^™ FILERS NOT SPATHU-

Rawak now preserved in good condition at Paris. Referred In 'Fries
who never saw it, to Polyporus affinis, to winch it has no affinity and
compiled in error m Saccardo as a synonym. In my opinfon it is a
lateral stemmed form of elegans of Europe.

Fig. 489
Melanopus nephridius.

Fig. 490

Folyporus melan
opus (bis).

NEPHRIDIUS (Fig. 489).— Pilens bay brown, with a slightly
scabrous surface. Stipe lateral, short, black. Pores white, minute.
Known from a few collections from South America. It is a plant
intermediate between this section and the section Microporus. but is
closer to this.

GAYANUS. — Pileus rigid, firm, smooth. Context pale. Stipe
black, lateral, rudimentary. Known from one collection made in Chile
by Gay, which has another name, cycliscus.

(Dictyopus and hemicapoodcs in the preceding sections sometimes have lateral stipes.)

53. STIPE LATERAL BUT PILEUS NOT SPATHULATE.
PORES MEDIUM OR LARGE.

PUSILLUS (bis or tris). — A minute, little plant, known from
one single specimen, less than i cm. in diameter, at I'psala. collected
in Brazil, eighty years ago. Stipe lateral, short, round, black. IWc-
favoloid. Referred by Fries to his then new genus. Fnvolns, hut i-
quite distinct from the type of plants that have since become known
under that name.

185

SECTION MELANOPUS.

MELANOPUS (bis) (Fig-. 490).— Pileus reniform, smooth.
Pores medium favoloid. Stipe lateral, smooth, black. Known from
two little specimens in Montagne's herbarium from South America.
Classed by Montague in Favolus but its relations are entirely with
this section.

54. (PETALOIDES) STIPE LATERAL. PILEUS SPATHU-
LATE, TAPERING TO THE STIPE.

These plants could be put in a section Melanopus of Section Feticides with equal propriety.

GUILFOYLEI (Fig. 491).— Pileus thick, rigid, smooth, pale or
yellowish. Pores very minute. Pileus tapering to a short, black stipe.
Originally from Australia. Specimens at Kew from Australia, Samoa,
Philippines, Malay, and Mexico.

Fig 491

Melanopus Guilfoylei.

Fig. 492

Melanopus Warburgianus.

WARBURGIANUS (Fig. 492).— Pileus thick, rigid, smooth,
dark. Pores minute, dark. Stipe short, black but there is no distinct
ring at the base as shown in Hennings' figure. Known from a single
specimen at Berlin from the Celebes. Classed by Hennings and found
in Saccardo as Fomes (sic). Murrill's Philippine references are all
wrong.

XEROPHYLLUS (Fig. 493).— Pileus subreniform, but tapering
to the short, black stipe. Surface strongly raised, striate. Pores
minute. Known from a single specimen at Kew from New Zealand.

186

SECTION MELA.\< >l'l S.

Fig 493
Melanopus xerophyllus.

Fig 494
Melanopus radiato-scruposus.

Fig 495

RADIATO-SCRUPOSUS (Fig. 494).— Pileus spathulate, dark
brown, strongly rugulose, striate, tapering to a short, lateral black stipe.
Pores small. Known only from the type specimens at I'.erlin from
Brazil.

M AI,.\( )MIXLTS (Fig. 495)- — Pileus spathulate. reddish bn.uu.
smooth, with crenate, lobed, thin margin, tapering to short, smooth,
lateral, black stipe. Pores minute, probably white when fresh. Speci-
mens at Paris from Mexico which had been sent to Cooke and named
"Teysmanni. Berk." which does not exist, and the name is not appro-
priate for a Mexican plant.

SYNONYMS, REJECTED AM) UNKNOWN Sl'KCIKS.

atratus, Mexico, Fries. No type exists.

atripes, Asia, Rostrup. Unknown.

atrofuscus, South America, Leveille. Type inadequate. Probably only a
short stemmed specimen of lateralis.

Beccarianus, Borneo, Cesati. Unknmvn.

Calyculus, South America, Patouillard. Unknown to me, but from the
figure I judge it is hemicapnodes.

cyathoides, Europe, Swartz. Unknown in the museums and referred
small form of melanopus.

cycliscus, South America, Montagne=Gayamis and based on the
collection.

diabolicus (bis), Brazil, Spegazzini. Unknown.

dimorphus, Malay, Cooke=hemicapnodes with a lateral Mipc

fissus, United States, Berkeley. Type inadequate. Probably depaupen
picipes and not fissile.

glabratus. Australia, Kalchhrenner. Unknown.

infernalis, Brazil, Berkeley=dictyopus, but most of the spccinu-n> i.
museums bear this name.

Juranensis, Brazil, Hcnnings (as var. of Leprieurn)=Guyanei

maculosus, Central America, Murrill. Unknown.

l87

SECTION MELANOPUS.

minimus, Europe, Fries. A tiny, little form of elegans. No specimens known.

nephelodes, South America, Leveille. No type exists. Said by Fries to be
the same as infernalis.

nigripes, Africa, Massee=hemicapnodes.

nummularius, Europe, Bulliard=elegans.

pertenuis, Asia, Kalchbrenner. Unknown.

pusillus, Asia, Rostrup. Unknown to me. Said to be zoned, hence probably
does not belong in this section.

rufo-atratus, Brazil, Berkeley=rhizomorphus (sans rhizomes).

scabellus, West Indies, Patouillard=nephridius.

seminigrita, Brazil, Berkeley=Guyanensis.

Strangerii, Australia, Mueller. Unknown. Seems from the description to
be dictyopus.

subelegans, West Indies, Murrill. Unknown to me. The description sug-
gests xerophyllus or radiato-scruposus.

tephromelas, South America, Montagne=Leprieurii.

Teysmanni, Mexico, Cooke. (Mss.) Changed to malnominus.

trachypus, United States, Montague. Based on an abortive picipes.

tubaeformis. Europe, Karsten. Evidently close to varius and given as a
form in Saccardo.

Underwoodii, United States, Murrill. I think will prove to be the same
as admirabilis.

versiformis, India, Berkeley. Based on two little specimens, one of which
seems to be melanopus, the other I think is different.

Fig. 496
Petalo --s osseus.

188

ADDENDA.

NOTES. COMMENTS AND OMISSIONS.

The following points have come up since this pamphlet has

been in type. We include here some comments on Romell's article

on Brazilian fungi, a critical and valuable paper which we did not

have at Kew, when the main portion of this pamphlet was written.

MESOPODIAL AND PLKfROPODIAI..

These terms which are really coined words, meaning central and exccntric
stemmed, are for the most part spelled Mesopodal and Pleuropodal in the body of
the work. The correct spelling is probably Mesopodial and Plcuropodial to corre-
spond with the word podial as spelled in the Century- Dictionary.

jnary.

SECTION GANODERMUS 2.

LUCIDUS. — Several collections received from C. D. Mahaluxmirala shows that
this is one of the most puzzling and variable species in the tropics. The tropical
form so referred are not as strongly laccate as the European form. The stem is
usually shorter, thicker, and often mesopodial. It is usually pleuporodial in temper-
ate regions. It varies in the tropics also greatly as to the color. Numerous inter-
mediate species connect it with Curtisii.

SECTION AMAURODERMUS 5.

AURISCALPIUM. — A fine collection has recently been received from C.ustav
Peckolt, Brazil. It is evidently quite a common plant in Brazil. The stipe pro-
ceeds from a deep rooting rhizome and probably connected with a creeping rhizome,
though none of these specimens show it.

Most of the specimens are "auriscalpium" in shape, though some are meso-
podial. I expect in time that Auriscalpium, omphalodes, praetervisus, bolcticeps,
and rufobadius will all prove to be one and the same species.

SECTION AMAURODERMUS 5.

CHAPERI (Page 112, fig. 406). — We have recently received a specimen from
(iustav Peckolt, Brazil, which is the second specimen known. The original in the
museum at Paris was supposed to come from Cuba.

It has a character that I have noted in but very few species (Polyporu- vi-rm-
cosus p. 182, and Fomes pachyphloeus Myc. Notes Pol. Issue, p. 34). The ligneous,
colored, hyphae fibrils of the pore walls are pointed on the ends and project int..
the pores simulating the colored setae of many species, which are called cyvtkfaa,
and which are distinct from the subhymenial tissue.

SECTION AMAURODERMUS 5.

RUDIS. — Specimens received from Australia are much larger than any in the
museums of Europe. One specimen had a pileus eight inches in diameter.

SECTION AMAURODERMUS 5.

VARIABILIS (cfr. p. 111).— I think this is only known from the original
collections of Spruce (No. 57 and 183 part) and Berkeley confused under this name
two quite different species. Romell refers here and figures a plant from Brazil
that must be different, first in its dark color (atrocastaneus). Variabilis
colored Second, in its much more obese habits (cfr. Romell s figure, Tab. 2, I. .61.
with our figure 405 of the type). Third, in the spores described as grai
and they are smooth as far as I can note in the type.

189

SECTION LIGNOSUS 10.

DEALBATUS. — Few plants have been worse confused than dealbatus. It
was originally collected by Ravenel and Curtis and named by Berkeley in 1853.
These types are all I have seen. (There are cotypes also in Ravennel's collection
in British Museum). They are found in a "Fomes" cover at Kew, but should be
classed as a Polyporus.

At the same time Berkeley named mutabilis also from Ravenel's collection.
It has little resemblance to dealbatus (cfr. figs. 422 and 446), and is a thin, zonate
plant, a Polystictus as classed. Ravenel distributed (Fasc. 3, No. 10), Polystictus
mutabilis as dealbatus, and Berkeley, when he made his resume in Grevillea, cites
this distribution as being correct. Berkeley made so many "new species" he could
not remember them himself.

Dealbatus is found in Saccardo, vol. 6, p. 159, as a "Fomes," and also page 218
as a "Polystictus," both with exactly the same description, word for word, and
"Polystictus" has as much resemblance to "Fomes" as a piece of paper has to a
lump of coal. It is a good example of the value of our "literature."

Murrill, in his half-hour studies in the principal museums, probably never saw
the type specimen, for he gives mutabilis as a synonym for dealbatus. He uses the
word dealbatus in keeping with the sacred principle of priority, it having been pub-
lished in a "prior" position (the previous page) in the same article. Of course,
that is much more important for the purpose of a juggle than the fact that the plants
have little resemblance or relation to each other, and should not be classified in the
same section. Then to make the matter more binding he discovers that mutabilis
and unguicularius (which no one knows anything about) and a few others form a
"new genus" and takes Polyporus dealbatus as his "type species."

SECTION LIGNOSUS 10.

PAULENSIS. — In a letter just received from Bresadola, he writes me that
paulensis is a young specimen of angustus. I should never suspect it and the spores,
according to my observations, were not the same.

SECTION LIGNOSUS 11 C.
Context colored. Setae present.
(See Musashiensis, page 135, Fig. 436. Also remarks on page 191).

SECTION LIGNOSUS 11B.

SCOPULOSUS. — This is a marked species with its black stem and smooth
pale pileus crust. It was named by Berkeley from Australia fifty years ago, and
the type is in good condition although "effete." Then Reichardt published a good
figure of it under the name Trametes Rhizophorae. It grows in Australia and in
the East abundantly, and has been known to European mycologists from abundant
collections for years. It was sent to Murrill from the Philippines in quantities, and
he referred it to a "new genus" that he had discovered under the specific name
anebus, to which species it has no resemblance whatever. On his second visit to
Kew he probably noted that the specimens that Cooke had referred to "anebus"
were badly named and he "corrected" it, this time discovering it was another "new
genus" and referred it to "Warburgianus," to which species it has less resemblance
than to "anebus." It is curious how much easier it is to discover a "new genus"
than it is to learn an old, common and well-known species, which is abundantly
represented in the museums. We have specimens from A. D. Machardo, Perak; S.
Hutchings, Bengal; and Bresadola, Philippines.

When in its prime the surface is smooth, but weathered specimens become
scrobiculate. Such a specimen was the "type," and was named evidently from this
"character." This is one of the misfortunes that plants often suffer from being
named by those who have very scanty knowledge of them.

IQO

SECTION PETALOIDES 12.

OSSEUS (Fig. 496, page 188). -We have not included l'ulv,*,r», osaeun -„„»,
the stipitate species, although as the pilei taper to short stem- ike I, ,M-
be sought in this section. Its general habits of growth are imbricate?^ n a n x
sessile species belonging to the section Apus of Fries. \\V know of no ,,i her Bpede.
similar in this respect. Polyporus osseus is a rather rare plant in E uro,>, as n i>
T '.K • States. The flesh when growing is firm and m drvm* become* quite

hard, hence it is not badly named. The European plant i> white ?„ t.,r as I 1, ve
seen specimens, but the American plant is gray. I have known it in America for
years without a name for it, for I did not associate it with the white l-nro^-.m
species. However, Bresadola so refers my American specimens, and I U-lieve
correctly. (See Figure 496, page 188).

SECTION PETALOIDES 13.

FRACTIPES. — This has a lateral stem and is a white plant. The "t>|K-"
specimen of fractipes may have had its stem broken, but the name has no applica-
tion to the plant usually, and it seems a pity to have a plant so misnamed on account
of an accidental feature of the type. It grows more common in the South, bin lu>
been found by Peck and called Polyporus humilis. It also reaches me from Rex
Rick, Brazil.

Polyporus Peckianus is a yellow plant with a central stem. It is xvry rare
and I have but two collections (D. B. Griffin, Vermont, and A. S. Bertolet, Canada i.
It is given as a synonym for fractipes by Murrill, but differs entirely. He i.ill-
the plant "fractipes Berk." and draxvs the description from Peck's specimen. Me
puts it in the section Merismus, and neither fractipes nor Peckianus belongs tin-re.
One belonging to the section Petaloides with lateral stem, the other to Lent us with
a central stem.

SECTION PETALOIDES 15.

MODESTUS AND RUBIOUS. The former is frequent in South America,
the latter in the East, and I have been very much puzzled to decide if they are the
same or different species. Both, I think, are rose-colored when fresh, but the old
specimens I have seen are more brown, having lost the fresh color. Romell records
both from Brazil (with different spores), but as he compares the color of rubidus
with vinosus I judge the determination is doubtful. At Leiden I haxv seen old
specimens determined as rubidus which are dimidiate and imbricate, but I do not
know if correct or not.

Modestus is confused in the Kunze exsiccatae, the specimen at Kexv not being
the same as the type at Upsala. Berkeley at first had it right, but afterwards
misled by the Kunze misdetermination he referred it usually to albo-cervinus,
which is a synonym for modestus.

SECTION PETALOIDES 17.

MUSASHIENSIS (page 135, fig. 436).— This, I think would haxe been better
placed in a section of Lignosus than Petaloides. It should go in Section lie, being
the only species in the section with setae. In its structure it is allied to £\\\u>, etc.
My reference of Mr. Kawamura's specimen to Henning's species, on the description
only is of course doubtful. The specimen was submitted to Bresadola and was un-
known to him, and he probably is acquainted xvith Musashiensis.

SECTION PETALOIDES 18A.

PERVERSUS— We have so indicated a form of Polyporus grammoccpli.ilii>.
xvhich was collected by Copeland (No. 18) in the Philippines and recorded and .
tributed to three museums in Europe as being coracmus, as named by .Mr. Alurnl
This collection was probably so named by Mr. Murrill, but is quite different i
structure in having no cystidia whatever. The original coracmus has xcry pen
cystidia I am told by Bresadola, and is the same or close to cinnamomeo-squai
osus as illustrated, Fig. 441. I have not seen the original of coracmus, an
learned of the mistake I took these Copeland specimens in good faith.

SECTION PETALOIDES 18 C.

It develops that there are several polyporoids with very peculiar setae, as il-
lustrated in Figures 441 and 442. The species considered in this pamphlet are
cinnamomea-squamosus (p. 138) russiceps (p. 138), megaloporus (p. 138), and co-
racinus (p. 146, unknown to me). In addition, Favolus princeps of Cuba has these
same peculiar cystidia and perhaps other species of Favolus. Bresadola is inclined
to refer them all to one species. They seem different to me in macroscopic characters,
though the microscopic characters are quite close.

SECTION MERISMUS 28.

DISPANSUS (Fig. 498). Pileus submerismatoid, appearing to
be borne irregular from a common base. Surface smooth. Color
yellowish. Pores small, colored, reddish brown (about same color
as those of Polyporus rutilans). Context thin, the pores almost
reaching the cuticle. Spores abundant, globose, smooth, 3^-4 mic.,
hyaline.

Fig. 498.

Type from A. Yasuda (No. 7) from Sendai, Japan.

This is quite similar in its habits to Polyporus Wynnei of Europe,
which is the only plant to my knowledge that it suggests. Both are
doubtfully included in the section Merismus. The Japanese plant
is abundantly different from the European in its colored pores, and
spore shape. We have no plant in the .United States that approaches
either.

SECTION MERISMUS 29.

FIMBRIATUS. — The common plant in the American tropics which has the
peculiar hymenial configuration, as shown in Figure 453, has been classed in six
different genera. We consider it as a degenerate type of a polyporoid. We refer
it to fimbriatus following Bresadola, though the type specimen of fimbriatus at
Upsala has perfect pores. Otherwise it seems to be the same to us.

I92

SECTION PKI.LOI'ORl s 36.

ORIENTALS (Fig. 499).-Entire plant concoloroua ferru

gmus brown turbmate, tapering to a short tlnYk s i ,i n, , ,™~
Surface smooth, faintly zoned, minutely vclutinatc, soft to ,1 t, u h'
Context ferrugineus Hyphae colored. Porea mima, i, u' '
ored pointed straight, thickened at the base. Spores 4x , t
colored or sub hyaline.

Type from Jintaro Umemuro (Xo. 1) Akazaki, Japan.

Fig. 499.

Pelloporus orient alis.

This species is allied to Polyporous tomentosus, but differs in
its form, setae, and surface, and has no spongy upper layer. The
spores we have not found in numbers so that we are very sure about
them, and possibly they are hyaline. In that case the plant in its
context color, setae and spores is close to Polyporus musashk-iiM'.-.
(page 135). While the plant is evidently more closely related to
Polyporus tomentosus than to any in the section Pelloporus, we
feel it can not be placed with tomentosus in the section Spongiosus.

193

SECTION PELLOPORUS 36A.
(Related to Amaurodermus).

TURBOFORMIS (Fig. 500).— Pileus depressed on top, turbin-
ate, tapering to a short, thick stem at the base. Surface rugulose,
reddish brown. Context light gilvous yellow, sublignotis. Hyphea

Fig. 500
Pelloporus turboformis.

deep yellow. Pores brown, darker than the context, minute, with
glancing mouths. Setae none. Spores globose, non-apiculate, deep
colored, smooth, 5-6 mic. in diameter.

Type from G. H. Krumbiegel, Baroda, India.

This species is quite different from anything that I have found
named in the museums. It resembles a Ganodermus in its general
effect, but is quite different in its context color and spores I am at
a loss where to place it for it really should form a section of lignose
plants close to Amaurodermus. However, I do not like to multiply
the sections. It has a distant relationship to Polyporus vallatus,
hence I place it (provisionally) in a related section, but according to
our key characters it would be sought in Amaurodermus.

194

SECTION PELLOPORUS 36.

We have a collection from Prof. A. Yasucla (No. 12), Semlai, Japan, which is
unknown to us and we believe unnamed. It seems to have an abortive ami probably
fictitious stipe. The color context and pores is ferrugineus. Setae none >i,.,r. -
globose 4-5 white (or perhaps very pale color). We would prefer not to name! it
until we learn more as to its normal stipe characters.

SECTION PELLOPORUS 37C.
Context thin. Hymenium with Setae.

HAMATUS. — Mesopode, subcoriaceus, infundibuliform. Con-
text thin (not spongy). Setae slender curved. Spores colored,
elliptical, smooth, 5-6 x 8-9.

I know this only from Romell's excellent description and figure
based on material from Brazil. It differs from all others of tin- sec-
tion Pelloporus in having setae. In the nature of the setae (rur\rd>
it is close to Polyporus circinatus (p. 159) in the section Spongiosus.

SECTION OYINUS 39.

We have an unnamed specimen from Prof. Petch, Ceylon, that we would refer
to this section, although it is thinner and not so fleshy as others in this section.
It might be included in Lentus, although as it grows in the ground in its habits it
is more allied to Ovinus. Prof. Petch tells me it is quite rare in Ceylon and grows
in circles.

SECTION MELANOPORUS 44.

HARTMANNI. — The only collections are two at Kew and one recently re-
ceived by me from Miss Margaret Flockton, Australia. The spores are 5x12,
hyaline, smooth. The species is badly figured in the Handbook, as it is cvidtmlv
not red as shown, but brown.

SECTION LENTUS 45 (d MICROPORl S).

INCOMPTUS. — This was given in my Synopsis as a synonym for Hal »1-
liformis, my view being based on a specimen named by Fries, which has a lateral
stipe. In the sense of the figure given in Reliquiae Af/elianae it has a meeopodial
stipe and is the same (and for me the correct name now) as what was called in my
pamphlet Polystictus Holstii. Fries evidently did not attach any value to t1
mesopodial and pleuropodial characters in this section.

SECTION LENTUS 46A.
He records

PARTITUS (cfr. p. 175).— Romell records and figures this plant fron
-ecords the spores as elliptical, "hyaline-luteolae" 7 x 11-12.

SECTION MELANOPORUS 54.

GUILFOYLEI AND WARBURGI ANUS.— These two species arc not as rl..M-
as might be inferred from our figures. Guilfoylei is a pale colored plant and \\.ir
burgianus is almost black. Murrill refers Guilfoylei as a synonym for elegans.
is almost as bad a reference as his determination of scopulosus, hr>i u a
as Warburgianus. The five species Guilfoylei and elegans, anebus KOpul.
Warburgianus, which he has muddled have no resemblance and little r«-la
to the other.

195

INDEX SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, ETC.

Species which in my opinion, are synonyms, errors, mistakes or blun-
ders, species that rest on some old vague description of which no material
exists, also the species that have not been seen by me and of which no speci-
mens have been found in the principal museums, together with the country
from which they have been exploited, and the names of those who are re-
sponsible for this work.

PAGE

........... 161

........... 156

.......... 145

........... 176

........... 178

........... 145

........... 145

........... 108

........... 145

.......... 156

.......... 168

........... 178

........... 156

.......... 156

........... 145

........... 145

........... 178

........... 145

........... 176

........... 176

........... 108

........... 178

........... 108

........... 168

........... 187

........... 187

........... 145

........... 145

........... 187

........... 145

.......... 121

.......... 145

.......... 108

.......... 145

.......... 156

.......... 121

.......... 178

.......... 145

.......... 156

.......... 187

.......... 161

.......... 161

.......... 178

.......... 121

.......... 121

.......... 145

.......... 156

.......... 156

.......... 172

...... 166

.......... 168

abortivus

United States

. . .Peck

acanthoides

Europe

. . .Bulliard

Adami

Ceylon

. . . Cooke

aemulans

Cuba

. . . Berkeley

agariceus

Ceylon

. . . Berkeley

Agaricon

Java

. . .Zollinger

albo-cervinus

Brazil

... Berkeley

albo-cinctus

Africa

. . . Patouillard . .

albo-luteus

Asia

. . . Rostrup

alligatus

... Europe

. . .Fries

alpinus

Europe

. . .Sauter

alveolarius

United States

. . .Bosc

amygdalinus

United States

.. .Berkeley. . .

anax

United States

. Cooke

anisoporus

.... Europe

. . Montagne . . . .

annularius

Java

. . . Fries

apalus

Brazil

. . . Berkeley

apophysatus

Europe

. . . Rostkovius. . .

arculariellus

United States

. . .Murrill

arculariformis

United States

...Murrill

argillaceus

Cuba

...Murrill

Armitii

Australia

. . . Cooke

asperulatus

Philippines

...Murrill

asprellus

Europe

. . . Leveille

atratus

Mexico

. . .Fries

atripes

Asia

. . . Rostrup

atro-albus

Africa

. . . Hennings

atro-cervinus

Brazil

. . . Error Sacc . . . .

atro-fuscus

Brazil

. ..Leveille.. . .

atypus

Java

. . . Leveille

auriscalpioides . . . .

...... Brazil

. . . Hennings

Aurora

Borneo

. . . Cesati

avellaneus

Central America. . .

. . .Murrill

bambusicola

India

. . .Hennings

Barrelieri

Europe

. . . Viviani

bataanensis

Philippines

...Murrill

Bataviensis

. . Java

. . .Holterman. . . .

Baurii

Africa

. . . Kalchbrenncr .

Beatiei

.... United States

...Peck

Bcccarianus

. . . .Borneo

. . .Cesati

benquetensis

.... Philippines

. . .Murrill

biennis

.... Europe

. . .Bulliard

Binnedykei

.... Java

. . . Cooke

Boleticeps

. . . .South America. . . .

. . Patouillard .

boleticus

.... South America ....

. ..B. S. Myc.. .

bomfinensis

.... Brazil

. . .Hennings

bonariensis

.... South America ....

. .Spegazzini. .

botryoides

. . . ." Incog"

...Leveille.

Brasiliensis

. . . .Brazil

. . .Spegazzini. . . .

bulbipes

.... Australia

...Fries

bulpipes (bis)

.... Europe

. . .Beck

I96

INDEX SYNONYMS. MISTAKES, ETC.

Butignoti

cachoeiracensis . .

cadaverinus

caespitosus

callochrous

Calyculus

Campbelli

canalium

candidus

carbonarius

caryophyllaceus. .

casearius

cassiaecolor

caudicinus

cclebicus

Ccratoniae

cervicornis

cervino-nitens. . .

Cincinnatus

cinerasccns

Cladonia

Clemensiac

Clusianus

clypcatus

coffeatus

collybioidcs

Columbicnsis

confundens

conglobatus

conglobatus (bis) .

connatus

conspicabilis

coracinus

cotyledoneus

Cowelli

crassipes

cremoricolor

crcnatus

cretatus

cuneatiformis

cuprco-nitens. . . .

cupuliformis

Currani

Currani (bis)

Curtisii (bis)

cyathiformis

cyathoidcs

cycliscus

declivis

decolor

dccrcscens

decurrens

delicatus

dcndriticus

depressus

diabolicus (bis) . . .
dibaphrus. . .

dictyoporus

dilatatus

dilatus (bis)

•Europe .Boudier \2a

Brazil Hennim-

•Europe Schulze. 168

.South America Cooke. . . 155

•Incog I.eveille 17g

South America Patouillard

India.. . . Berkeley J6g

China Loureiro 1 20

Europe.... .Roth....

Europe Fries 155

South America Cooke. . . \ \t>

Europe Fries. . . . j ;,,

Brazil Berkeley i >i

Europe... ..Juggle... u,,s

Last Indies Hennings i \(>

.Europe... Kisso i v,

. West Indies Cooke. 140

South America Berkeley 14<,

. United States Morgan . . 1 5<,

. East Indies Leveille . . lj(,

.Australia Berkeley 166

.Philippines Murrill..... . 121

. Europe Britzelmayr . 168

.South America Patouillard .178

.West Indies Berkeley

.Australia Kalchbrenner 1 7>

. United States Berkeley ITS

. Borneo Cesati 146

. United States Berkeley. 15(>

. Europe Karsten . . .161

. United States Schweinitz 166

. Europe Britzelma\ r . . 178

.Philippines Murrill...". . . 146

.South America Spegaz/ini. 145

.West Indies Murrill .178

.India Curry .178

.India Berkeley 176

.Ceylon Berkeley 14<.

.United States Cooke.. . 146

.Philippines Murrill

.Australia Kalchbrenner.

. United States Berkeley

.Philippines Murrill'. .

.Philippines Murrill...

United States Berkeley (as Favolus). .

.West Indies Leveill6. .

. Europe Swart z

.Chili Montagne. .

. Pacific Islands . .Kalchbrenner.

.Brazil Berkeley.

.Java Zollinger.

. United States Underwood.

.United States Berkeley

.Mexico Fries.

.South America Patouillard J'*

. Brazil Spcgazzini.

. United States Berkeley

.West Indies Patouillard.

Java I^veilK-

.Ceylon Berkel. v

197

INDEX SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, ETC.

PAGE

diminutus

. .Australia

. . .Massee

.... 146

dimorphus

. . Malay

. . . Cooke

.... 187

discifer

. .Java

. . . Patouillard

.... 145

discolor

. .Mauritius

. . . Klotzsch

.... 156

dualis

. .United States

.. .Peck

.... 161

Earlei

. .United States

. . . Underwood

.... 168

Ehrenreichii

. . Brazil

. . .Hennings

.... 166

Elmcrianus

. . Philippines

. . .Murrill

.... 121

criopus

. . Borneo

. . . Cesati

146

esculentus

. .Europe

. . . Britzelmayr

178

Euphorbiae

. .China

. . . Patouillard

.... 166

curocephalus

. . Ceylon

. . . Berkeley

156

cvanido-squamulosus .

. . Africa

. . .Hennings

145

fagicola

. . United States

..Murrill

176

favularis

. . Pacific Islands . . . .

. . .Fries

178

fibro-radians

. . South America . . . .

. . . Montagne

146

fimbriatus

. .Europe

. .Bulliard

166

fissus

. . United State?

. . Berkeley

187

flabellato-lobatum. . . .

..Africa

. . Hennings

146

llabcllatus

. .Europe

. . Bresadola

156

flavidus (bis)

. . United States

.Peck

178

flaviporus

. .West Indies

Murrill

108

flavo-squaniosus

. .United States

. . . Underwood

168

flavo-virens

. .United States

. . Berkeley

168

flexipes

. .Brazil

. . . Fries

178

floccopus

. . Europe

. . . Rostkovius

178

formosissimus

. . South America

. . .Spegazzini

109

Forquignoni

. . France

. . Quelet

168

fuegianus

. . South America . . . .

. . .Spegazzini

172

fuligineo-albus

. . Europe

. . .Trog

178

fuligineus

. .Europe

. . .Fries

168

gallinaceus. . . .,

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

146

geminella

. .Brazil

. . . Moeller

146

glaberimus

. .South America. . . .

. . . Montagne (as Irpex)

145

glabratus

. . Australia

. . . Kalchbrenner

187

Glaziovii

. Brazil

. . . Cooke

156

Glaziovii (bis)

. . Brazil

. Hennings

156

Gregonii

. . Africa

. . .Smith

.... 145

gualaensis

. . South America

. . Patouillard

. . . . 145

Guarapiensis

.Brazil

. . .Spegazzini

... 172

Haenslerianus

. . New Zealand

. . Hennings

.... 109

hapalus

. .Brazil

. .var. spelling. . .

.... 178

helopus

. .Adventitious

. . . Patouillard

.... 156

hemibaphus

. .Brazil

. Berkeley

.... 129

hirto-lineatus

. .Java

. . . Patouillard

.... 145

hispidellus

. .United States

. . .Peck

.... 146

hispidoides

. .United States

. . . Peck

.... 161

holocyancus

. .United States

. . . Atkinson

.... 168

holophaeus. . .

. . Europe

. . . Montagne

.... 161

Holstii

•\frica

. Hennings

.... 146

Hostmanni

. . South America ....

. . . Berkeley

.... 146

humilis

. . United States

. . .Peck

.... 146

Humphrey!

. .West Indies

. . .Hennings

. ... 178

hydrophilus

. . Cuba

. . . Berkeley

.... 146

imbricatus

. . Europe

. . Bulliard

. 156

incendiarius

. .Europe

. . .Fries

.... 176

incompletus

. . Borneo

. . . Cesati

.... 145

inconspicuus

..Africa

. . . Miquel

.... 146

incrustatus

. . Central America. . .

. . .Fries

.... 109

infcrnalis

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

.... 187

198

INDEX SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, ETC.

intonsus

Tasmania .

Berkeley

PAGE

146
146
156

109

1S7
161
168

134

161

146

145
146
146
157
170
146
145
146
147
187
147
147
147
147
147
147
157
178
170
176
187
147
145
161
178
178
147
161
147
157
170
147
178
188
147
147
145
147
170
147
157
157
147
178
170
147
109
188
145

involutus
irregularis
Javanicus
Juranensis
Kalchbrenneri . . . .
Kansensis
Katui
Koenigii
Korthalsii
Kurzianus
labiatus

Europe
Europe
Java
Brazil
Europe
United States
Pac. Islands
... . . .Ceylon
Java
Java

Britzelmayr

•Sowi-rby
Leveille
Hennings (as von Leprieurii)
Tries
Ellis
.Ehrenberg
. . Berkeley
. . .Leveille
. . . Cooke

. . . Patouillard
. Change
.Junghuhnii
. . . . Peck
...Murrill

lacer Java
lacerus Java
lactifluus United States
laeticolor United States
languidus Africa
leiodermus South America. . . .
lenzitoides Brazil
Leprieurii (bis) South America. . . .
Leprieurii var. juranensisSouth America. . . .
Leveillei Java
Libum Australia
licmophorus India
Liebmanni Mexico
ligoniformis Europe
liturarius Pacific Islands. . .
lobatus Europe
luridus United States
luteoluteus United States
maculatus India
maculosus Central America. . .
malacensis Malay
manubriatus Sumatra
maximus Europe
meizoporus Cuba
melanocephalus Japan.
Meleagris Pacific Islands. . . .
Memmingeri United States
Menziesii Sumatra
Merrittii Philippines
Michelii Europe
microloma Philippines
Mildbachii Africa
minimus Europe
minutissimus Asia
Mollerianus Africa
monachus South America ....
monochrous South America. . . .
Morganii United States. . . .
Muelleri Australia
multiceps South America . .
multifidus West Indies. . . .
murinus Java
mycenoides New Caledonia. . .
myclodes Australia. . .
nanus (bis) Australia
neglectus Central America.. .
nephelodes South America . . .

. . .Fries
. . .Montagne
. . Berkeley
. . Montagne
. . . Hennings. . .
..Cooke
. . Berkeley
. . .Massee
Fries

. . Bonorden
. . . Berkeley
. . . Hudson
. . . Berkeley
. . . McGinty
. . Berkeley . . .
...Murrill
. . . error in Saccardo
. . . Leveille
. . . Brotero
. . . Berkeley
. . . Patouillard
Berkeley

. . Murrill
. . . Berkeley
. . . Murrill
. . . Fries
. . . Leveille
. . . Mss Berlin
. . . Fries
. . . Rostrup
. . . Saccardo

Montagne. . .

. . . Kalchbrenner .
. . . Patouillard
. . . Klotzsch (as Thelephora).
. . . Leveille
. . . Patouillard
. . . Kalchbrenner. .
. . .Massee
. . Patouillard
I eveille

Berkeley. .

199

INDEX SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, ETC.

PAGE

nigrescens

. . . .Brazil

Cooke

147

nigripes

. . . .Brazil

. . .Fries

. . . . 121

nigripes (bis) ......

. . . . Africa

. . .Massee

. . . . 188

nodipes

. . . .India

. . . Berkeley

. . . . 170

notopus
novo-guineensis ....

. . . .Java
. . . . New Guinea

. . . Leveille
. . .Hennings

. . . . 147
. ... 170

nummularius

. . . . Europe

. . . Bulliard

. ... 188

nutans

. . . . Central America. . .

. . . Fries

. . . . 109

obesus

. . . . United States

...Ellis

. . . . 162

obolus

. . . . Central America. . .

. ..Ellis

. . . . 178

obscura

. . . .China

. . . Kalchbrenner

. . . . 178

obsoletus

. . . .Brazil

. . . Fries

. . . . 129

occultus

. . . . Europe

. . .Lasch

. . . . 162

Olea

. . . . Europe

. . .Panizzi

... 157

olivascens

. . . Asia

. . .Rostrup

... 145

olivaceo-fuscus

. . . . Ceylon

. . . Berkeley

. ... 170

oxyporus

. . . . Europe

. . .Sauter

. ... 157

Pala

. . . . South America ....

. . . Leveille

. ... 121

palensis

. . . . Philippines

...Murrill

. . . . 147

pallidus

. . .Brazil

. . . Berkeley

. . . . 129

pallidus (bis)

. .Europe

. . .Schulzer

... 170

paraguayensis

... South America ....

. . . Spegazzini

. . . . 178

Parmula

Brazil

Berkeley

121

parvimarginatus . . .
parvulus

... South America ....
. . . .British Columbia. .

. . . Spegazzini
. . . Klotzsch

... 145
... 166

passerinus

. . .Brazil

. . . Berkeley

... 121

Pauletii

. . .Europe

. . .Fries

... 157

pauperculus

... South America ....

. . . Spegazzini

... 172

peltatus

... Costa Rica

. . .Fries

... 147

pendula

... United States

. . Juggle

, ... 147

Penningtonii

... South America ....

. . .Spegazzini

... 176

Pentzkei

... Australia

. . . Kalchbrenner

. . . 145

perdurans

. . . Tasmania

. . . Kalchbrenner

... 166

peronatus

... Europe

. . .Schulzer

... 166

peroxydatus

Australia

Berkeley

147

pertenuis

. . . Asia

. . . Kalchbrenner

... 188

Perula

. . . Africa ....

. . . Palisot

... 178

perzonatus

...Cuba

. . .Murrill

.... 109

petaloides (bis)

. . .Europe

. . .Fries

... 147

Pes-simiae

. . .Brazil

. . . Berkeley

... 109

phaeoxanthus

. . .United States

. . .Montagne

... 179

phlebophorus

... New Zealand

. . . Berkeley

... 147

pisiformis

. . .Australia

. . . Kalchbrenner

... 179

planus

. . .Europe

. ..Wallroth

. . . 179

platensis

. . . South America ....

. . .Spegazzini

... 179

platyporus

. . . India

. . . Berkeley

... 162

plumarius

... Cuba

. . . Berkeley (as Hydnum) . . . .

... 157

Pocos

. . Japan

. . . Berkeley

... 145

polygrammus

. . . Cuba

. . . Berkeley

... 147

poripes

... United States

. . .Fries

... 170

praelongus

. . . Cuba

. . .Murrill

... 109

procerus

. . . Brazil

. . . Berkeley

... 121

prolifcrus

. . .United States

...Lloyd

... 166

prostratus

. . .China

. . . Patouillard

. . . 145

proteiporus

. . . Australia

. . . Cooke

... 162

pseudoboletus
pseudo-cinerascens . .

. . .South America. . . .
. . . New Guinea

. . .Spegazzini
. . . Hennings

... 170
... 147

puellaris

. . . Pacific Islands ....

. . . Kalchbrenner

... 147

Puiggarii

... Brazil

. . .Spegazzini

... 179

pulcher

... Africa

. . . Fries

. . . 121

200

INDEX SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, ETC.

pullatus China Cooke. TM

pulverulentus West Indies. . . . Murrill 10Q

punctiporus Europe Britzelmayr . 170

pusillus (bis) . . Asia kostrup. ." 188

pusillus. . . .West Indies i.eyeille. . . 147

putidus. . . . .Central America. Fries 147

quadrans . . Australia Berkeley 1 79

ramosissimus . . Europe Juggle. . 157

ramosus United States Schweinit/ 157

rasipes. .... ... East Indies Berkeley . . 147

Rayenelii (bis) United States Berkeley 147

retipes United States. I mlerwood 1 7d

Rhizophorae. . . . East Indies. ... keichardt 1 2')

rhodophaeus Java I .eveille . 1 29

rigescens. ... . . Perak Cooke 147

Rostafinskii . Europe Blonski . . 157

rubricus . India Berkeley. . 157

rubripes Europe Rostkoviua 179

rubro-maculatus Europe Britzelmayr 17')

rufo-atratus Brazil Berkeley 188

rufobadius South America Patouillard

rufo-ochraceus Brazil Patouillard 147

rugosus (bis) Brazil Berkeley (as Porot helium

russogramme East Indies Berkeley 147

saccatus East Indies Persoon

Sahranpurensis India Hennings. . 162

Salpincta Xew Zealand Cooke

saxatilis Europe Britzelmayr.

scabellus West Indies Patouillard .

scabriusculus Australia Berkeley

Schweinfurthianus Africa I Jennings

scleropodius Africa Leycillv

scobinaceus Europe Juggle

scutellatus Siberia Borszczow.

scutiger Europe Kalchbrenner . . . 1<>2 "><>

semiclausus Brazil Berkeley

seminigrita Brazil Berkeley

sericellus Europe Saccardo

similis Brazil Berkeley

simillimus United States Peck

Sistotrema Europe Juggle.

sparassioides South America Spegazzini (as Craterellus]

spathulatus South America Hooker.

speciosus Europe Juggle

spectabilis United States Fries.

splendens United States Peck.

spongia Europe Fries

squamaeformis Borneo Berkeley

squamiger Australia Berkeley (as Favolus)..

squamoso-maculatus. . . . India Saccardo

stereoides (bis) Cuba .... Berkeley

sterinoides South America Hennings

stipitarius Cuba Berkeley

stipitatus Central America Murrill.

Strangerii Australia Mueller. .

Stuckertianus South America Spegazzim

subamboinensis Brazil Henning^

subelegans. . West Indies Murnll

subflabellus Africa Henniiv^-

subfornicatus Central America Murrill

201

INDEX SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, ETC.

PAGE

subgiganteus
subhydrophilus
subincrustatus

. . . United States
. . .Brazil
. . .West Indies

. . . Berkeley
. . . Spegazzini
.. .Murrill

157
145
109

subpendulus

. . . United States

. . . Atkinson

145

subpulverulentus. . . .

. . . Cuba

. . . Berkeley

148

subradicatus

. . . United States

. . .Murrill

170

subrenatus

. . . Central America. . .

...Murrill

. 121

subrugosus

. . . Samoa

. . . Bresadola

121

subsericeus

. . . United States

...Peck

166

subsquamosus

. . . Europe

. . . Linnaeus

170

substereinus

Cuba

Murrill

145

substriatus

. . . Europe

. . . Rostkovius

179

subverniceps

. . . Philippines

...Murrill

148

subvernicosus

. . .Brazil

. . . Hennings

148

subzonalis

. . . Australia

. . . Cooke

148

Sumstinei

. . . United States

. . .Murrill

157

tabulaeformis

. . . United States

. . . Berkeley

162

tephromelas

. . . South America . . . .

. . . Montagne

188

tessulatus

. . .Europe

. . .Fries

170

Teysmanni

. . .Mexico

. . .Cooke (Mss)

188

tigrinus

. . . Asia

. . . Rostrup

145

Todari

. .Europe

. . . Inzenga

157

tomohomiensis

. . .East Indies

. . .Hennings

148

torquescens

. . . Africa

. . . Saccardo

148

trachypus

. . . United States

. . . Montagne

188

trichrous

. . . United States

. . . Berkeley

157

triqueter (Error) ...

. . Europe

...Quelet

129

Trogii

. . . Europe

. . .Fries

129

Tsugae

. . . United States

.. .Murrill

109

tubaeformis

. . .Europe

. . . Karsten

188

tubarius

. . . Europe

.. .Quelet

179

tubulaeformis

. . . United States

. . . Error Sacc

162

tucumanensis

. . . South America . . . .

. . .Spegazzini

172

tunetanus

. . . Algeria

. . . Patouillard

176

udus

. . .Java

. . .Junghuhn

145

umbilicatus

. . .Java

. . .Junghuhn

179

Umbraculum

. . . Africa

. . .Fries

121

Underwoodii

. . . United States

...Murrill

188

unguicularis

. . . Mexico

. . . Fries

148

variiporus

. . . West Indies

. . .Murrill

176

velutipes

. . .China

. . . Patouillard

176

Verae-crucis

. . . Mexico

. . . Cooke

166

vernicifluus

. . . Tasmania

. . . Berkeley . .

148

versiformis

. . . India

. . . Berkeley

188

vibecinus

. . . Africa

. . .Fries

148

violaceo-maculatus . .

. . .China

. . . Patouillard

170

virax

. . .India

. . . Berkeley

148

virellus

. . . Europe

. . .Fries

170

virgineus

. . . United States

. . .Schweinitz

148

viscosus

_ Europe

Persoon

170

vitiensis

. . .Pacific Islands. . . .

. . . Reichardt

145

Vossii

. . . Europe

. . . Kalchbrenner

179

Warmingii

. ..Brazil

. . . Berkeley

157

Weddelii

. . .Brazil

. . . Montagne

179

Whiteae

. . . United States

.. .Murrill

170

xoilopus

. . .Europe

. . . Rostkovius

170

xylodes

...Brazil

. . . Berkeley

121

Zenkeri

. . . Africa

. . . Hennings

179

Zollingeri

. . .Java

. . . Saccardo

179

202

INDEX.

f the sPecies considered valid in this pamphlet, the section
to which they belong, the country from whence they were exploited, and
the personal name that may be added to them by those who favor this
system of advertisement. Those species that appeal to me as being good
and distinct and as having merit, I put in bold face type. Those that are
better considered as varieties or which are based on more or less doubtful
material are marked with a star in light face type.

acicula

Lentus

. Cuba

Berkeley . .

PACE

177

admirabilis*

Melanopus. . . .

I'nited States. . .

Peck

180

affinis

Petaloides (Micr

o.) .Java

..Nees.

142

Africanus

Ganodcrmus. . .

. . . . Africa

MrOw.iu

103

albellus* (bis)

Petaloides

. . . . India

\l.i-see

137

Albertinii

albiceps

Spongiosus. . .
Melanopus. . . .

\ustralia
... I'nited State- .

Mueller. ..
.Peck.

160
180

Alluandi

Ganodermus. . .

Africa

Patouillard.

107

Amboinensis

Ganodermus. . .

. . . . Kast I ndies

Fries

102

angustus

Amaurodcrmus.

. . . . South America . .

Berkeley

114

annulatus

Petaloides

Java

Junghuhn.

131

anthelminticus*

Spongiosus. . . .

....India

BerkeK-v

158

anthracophilus

Merismus

. . . . Australia

Cooke.

152

antilopus

Petaloides

. . . . Australia

. . . Kalchbrenner .

142

aquosus .

Petaloides ....

Brazil

. 1 leniiings

130

aratoidcs*

Petaloidcs

. . . . New Caledonia. .

PatouQbrd . .

135

arcularius

Lentus

. . . . Kurope

Batsrh

175

arenatus

Lignosus

. . . . New Guinea ....

Patouillard.

126

armenicolor

Petaloides

. . . .Cuba

Berkeley

142

aspcrulus*

Petaloides

. . . . New C'aledonia. .

Patouillard . .

134

atropurpureus* .

1 -ignosus

. . . . Brazil

. . . Berkeley

126

Auriscalpium

Amaurodermus.

. . . . Brazil

Pers<x>n

113

basilapidoides*

Amaurodermus.

. . . . Australia

. . McAlpine .

115

Berkeley!

Merismus

. . . .United States. . .

\-r\i->

148

biokoensis

Petaloides

Africa

Ilrnnini;-

131

Blanchetianus*
Boninensis*

Melanopus. . .
(ianodcrmus. . .

Brazil
. . . . Bonin Island

Montagnc ,
. . Patouillard .

180
104

Boucheanus*
brachyporus
brachypus*

Ovinus
Petaloidcs
Petaloidcs

. . . . Kurope
. . . .South America. .
West Indies. .

Klotzsch
Montagne. .
Leycilk'

168
132
134

brumalis

Lentus . . .

. . . . Kurope

. Persoon

. 170

brunneolus Petaloidcs

. . . . Philippine-.

Berkeley .

133

brunneo-maculatusPetaloidcs.
brunneo-pictus Lignosus.
caeruliporus Ovinus. .
calcigenus \maurodermus.
camerarius Lignosus. .
candidus* Petaloides.
carneo-niger Petaloidcs.
Cayennensis* Petaloides .
Ch'aperi Amaurodermus
ciliaris* Lentus. . .

. . . . I ndia
. . . Brazil
. . . .United Statc-
. Brazil. .
. . . . Brazil
. . . . Kuropc
. . . .Australia .
Brazil
. ( 'uba
... South America.

( 'urrey
Berkeley
IVrk
Berkeley
Berkeley
IVr-oon

. . .Cooke.

Montague
Patouillard

Montague.

133
127
167
111
126
132
143
136
112

ciliatus
cinnabarinus. .

.Lentus. . .
.Petaloidcs. .

.... Kuro|x- .
. Kurope.

l-ric-

.Jacquin

144

cinnamomeo-squa-
mulosus. .
cinnamomeus. . .
circinatus. . . .

. Petaloides
. Pelleporus. . .
.Spongiosus. .

\frica

Hennini;-
[acquin
Friea

. 138
164
159

Kuropc

203

INDEX VALID SPECIES.

PAGE

cochlear

. . Ganodermus

.Java

...Nees

. 103

cochleariformis. . .

. . Petaloides

.India

. . . Cooke

. 139

Colensoi

. .Merismus

. New Zealand . . .

. . Berkeley

. 152

conchifer

. . Petaloides

. United States . . .

. . . Schweinitz ....

. 145

concinnus

. .Lentus

. Africa

. . Palisot

. 173

confluens

. .Ovinus

. Europe

. . Albertini

. 167

conf usus

. . Lentus

. United States . . .

. :':Massee

. 177

corrugis

. . Lignosus

.Europe

. . . Fries

. 122

corylinus*

. .Lentus

. Europe

. . . Viviani

. 170

Craterellus

. .Lentus. . .

. Cuba

. . . Berkeley

. 177

cremeo-tomentosus.Merismus

.Brazil

. . . Hennings

. 152

cristatus

. .Ovinus

.Europe

. . Persoon

. 167

cryptopus

. .Lentus

. United States . . .

. . Ellis

. 170

Cumingii
Curtisii

. . Pelleporus
. . Ganodermus

. Philippines
. United States . . .

. . Berkeley
. . Berkeley

. 162
. 102

cuticularis (bis) . .

. . Pelleporus

.United States. . . .

. . Morris

. 165

dealbatus

. .Lignosus

. United States . . .

. . Berkeley

. 124

decurrens*

. . Pelleporus

. United States . . .

. . .Morris

. 164

dependens

. . Pelleporus

.United States. . .

. . Berkelev

. 165

diabolicus

. . Fomcs (stipitatus) .

Brazil

. . Berkeley

. 100

Dickinsii*

. . Merismus

.Japan. . .

. . Berkeley

. 149

dictyopus*

. .Melanopus

. South America .

. . Montagni1 ....

. 180

Didrichsenii

. . Petaloides

.Pacific Islands . .

. . .Fries

. 133

discipes*

. . Petaloides

. Ceylon

. . Berkeley

. 135

discoideus

. .Ovinus

. Cuba

. . Berkeley

. 167

dispansus

. . Merismus

Japan

. .Yasuda

. 192

distortus*

. .Spongiosus

.United States. . .

. . . Schweinitz ....

. 158

dorcadideus

. . Petaloides

.Australia

. . Berkeley

. 137

dubiopansus*

. .Lignosus

. Brazil

. .Demazio

. 125

elegans

. . Melanopus

. Europe

. . Bulliard

. 180

Ellisii

. .Ovinus

. United States . . .

. .Cooke

. 168

Emerici*

. . Petaloides

.India

. . Cooke

. 137

!•'. mini

. .Ganodermus

.Africa

. . Hennings

. 105

exilis

Amaurodermus

Brazil

Berkeley

121

fasciculatus

. .Amaurodermus. . . .

.Africa

. . Patouillard . . .

. 117

favoloides

. .Lentus

. Africa

. . Hennings

. 174

favoloides* (bis) . . .

. . Petaloides

. Africa

. .Hennings

. 137

fimbriatus

. .Merismus

.Brazil

. .Fries

. 152

flabelliformis

. .Petaloides (Micro.)

. Mauritius

. . Klotzsch

. 143

flexipes

. .Ganodermus

.China

. . Patouillard . . .

. 104

florideus*

. .Lentus (Micro.) . . .

. India

. . Berkeley

. 173

f ocicola

. . Pelleporus

. Cuba

. . Berkeley

. 164

f ornicatus

. .Ganodermus

.Brazil

. .Fries

. 104

fractipes

. . Petaloides

. United States . . .

. . Berkeley

. 131

fragilissimus*

. .Spongiosus

. South America . .

. . Montagne ....

. 160

frondosus

. . Merismus

. Europe

. .Fl. Dan

. 150

fuscidulus

. . Lentus

. Europe

. .Schraeder. . . .

. 171

fusco-lineatus*

. . Petaloides

. Australia

. . Berkeley

. 137

fusco-maculatus .

. . Petaloides

. Samoa . . .

. . Bresadola ....

. 130

gallo-pavonis

. . Petaloides

.Australia

. . Berkeley

. 134

Gaudichaudii

. . Petaloides

.Malay

. . Leveille

. 134

Gayanus

. . Melanopus

.Chili

..Leveille

. 185

giganteus

. .Merismus

.Europe

. . Persoon

. 151

Glaziovii

. . Petaloides

. Brazil

. . Berkelev

. 135

glutinifer*

. . Petaloides

.Mauritius

. . Cooke

. 130

Goetzei

. . Ovinus

. Africa

. .Hennings

. 166

gracilis

. .Amaurodermus. . . .

. Brazil

. . Berkeley (as

gracilis

. .Lentus

.West Indies

Hexagona)..
. . Klotzsch

. 117
. 176

grammocephalus

. . Petaloides

. Philippines

. . Berkeley

. 136

204

INDEX VALID SPECIES.

graveolens

.Fomes (Congloba-

PAGE

tus)

I'nited Stales. .

. .Schweinit/

154

griseus

.Ovinus

. I'nited States.

Peck

167

guaraniticus
Guilfoylei

. Lentus
.Melanopus. . .

South America
.Australia

Berkeley

171
186

guyanensis

. Melanopus

South America. . .

Montague

183

hamatus

. Pelloporus

Brazil.

Romell

195

Hartmanni

.Ovinus

Australia

Cooke

168

hemicapnodes
Henningsii

. Melanopus
.Ganodermus

Cevlon . .
Africa .

Berkete)

. .Stuhlmaii

105

heteromorphus. . .

.Amaurodermus. . .

.Brazil

I.eveille

1 .'n

heteroporus*
Hildebrandi*

. Spongiosus
. Ganodermus

.Europe.
.Africa

Fries
I'atouillard

107

hirtus

. Petaloides

.Europe

(Jut-let . .

130

holotephrus

. Petaloides

Cuba

BerkeK \

142

hydniceps

. Melanopus

. Cuba

Berkeley. . . .

183

hypoplastus

. Lignosus

.Brazil

Berkelev

. 126

hystriculus

.Spongiosus. . . .

.Australia

Cook.

.. 158

incomptus

.Lentus (Micro.). . .

. Africa

. .Fries

173

incrustans*

.Ganodermus

I'nited States. . . .

Langlois

10'

incurvus

.Petaloides

. Malay

. ( 'ooke

134

indicus

. Pelloporus

. India

. Massee

162

insularis

\maurodcrmus

. New Caledonia.

. Patouillard .

117

intermedius

.Amaurodermus. . . .

. Brazil

. . Bresadola . .

112

irinus*

. Lentus

.South America. .

. . Patouillard .

172

Janseanus

. Petaloides

.Java

. .Hennings.

132

Japonicus*

. Ganodermus

.Japan

. .Fries

102

juriensis

.Amaurodermus. . . .

.Brazil

. . Hennings. . .

121

la tt-rat us

.Melanopus

.Rawak..

. . Persoon . . . .

. . 185

Lauterbachii*

.Ganodermus

. New Guinea

. .Hennings. . .

102

lentinoides*

. .Ovinus (Melan.). .

.South America. .

. . Hennings. . .

168

lentus

, .Lentus

.Europe. . . .

. . Berkeley . . .

176

lepideus

. .Lentus

.Europe

Fries

171

leporinus*
Leprieurii

. . Spongiosus
.Melanopus

.Europe
.South America. .

Fries
Montagne. .

160

. 183

leprodes*. . . .

. .Melanopus

.Europe. . .

. . Rostkovius.

. 180

leptoccphalus*

. .Lentus

. Europe

. .Jacquin ...

170

leptopus

. .Amaurodermus. . . .

. Rawak

. . Persoon ....

115

leucomelas

. .Ovinus

. Europe

Persoon. . . .

1<>7

Lingua

. .Ganodermus

. Java

, . . N'ees

104

lithophylloides* . . . .
longipes

. . Merismus
. .Amaurodermus. . . .

Japan
. South America . .

. . . Patouillard .

.I.eveille ..

152

us

lucidus

. .Ganodermus

. Europe. . . .

. . Leysser ...

102

luteo-nitidus
luteus. .

. Pelloporus
. . Petaloides (Micro.)

. Brazil
. Java

. Berkeley . . .

\ei-s

. . 162

142

macer*

. .Amaurodermus. . .

.Brazil

Berkeley . . .

1 1*'

maculatus*

. . Petaloides

. Malay

Berkeley . . .

l.>7

makuensis*

. . Petaloides

. Africa

Cooke

142

nuil ifiu is

. . Petaloides

. Malay

Cookc

135

malnominus

marasmioides.*. . . .
marasmioides* (bis)

. .Melanopus
. .Amaurodermus
. .Melanopus

.Mexico
.Brazil
.West Indies

La Salle
Berkel.-v
. . . Patouillard .

1S7
121
1S4

121

Marianus*
marmellosensis. . .
mastoporus
Makuensis
megaloporus
melanopus
melanopus (bis) . .
miniatus*

. . Petaloides
. . Lentus
. .Ganodermus
. Petaloides (Micro.)
. Petaloides
. .Melanopus. . .
. . Melanopus. . .
. .Merismus

. Pacific Islands .
. Brazil
.East Indies. .
Africa
. South America . .
.Europe
.South America. .

. . Hennings

I.eveille

. . .Cooke.
. . . Montagne. .
. . .Schumann.
Montagne.
Junghuhn. .

l->4

176

104
142
138
180
186
154

. j a \ a ....

205

INDEX VALID SPECIES.

PAGE

modes tus

. . Petaloides

. South America . .

. . .Fries

. 133

Montagnei

. . Spongiosus

. Europe

. . . Fries

. 160

montanus

. . Merismus

. Europe

. . .Quelet

. 148

multiformis

. . Pelloporus

. South America . .

. . . Montagne ....

. 163

multiplex

. . Merismus

.India

. . . Berkeley

. 152

musashiensis

. . Petaloides

.Japan

. . .Hennings

. 135

mutabilis

. . Petaloides

. United States . . .

. . . Berkeley

. 141

Mylittae

. .Ovinus

.Australia

. . . Cooke

. 167

nanus

. . Lentus

. Algeria

. . . Montagne ....

. 174

nephridius

. . Melanopus

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

. 185

nivicolor

. . Petaloides

. New Zealand . . .

. . . Colenso

. 131

oblectabilis

. . Pelloporus

.Brazil

. ..Ule

. 164

oblectans*

. .Pelloporus

. Australia

. . . Berkeley

. 164

obliquus

. . Petaloides

. New Guinea ....

. . . Massee

. 132

oblivionis

. .Pelloporus

.Brazil

. . . Spruce

. 164

obovatus

. . Petaloides

Java

. . Junghuhn ....

. 141

ocellatus

. .Amaurodermus. . . .

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

. 119

ochrolaccatus ....

. . Ganodermus

. Philippines

. . . Montagne ....

. 105

omphalodes

. .Amaurodermus. . . .

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

. 113

opacus

. .Ganodermus

.Brazil

. . .Montague. . . .

. 106

orbicularis

. .Lentus

. Europe

. . .Sautcr

. 176

orientalis

. . Pelloporus

Japan

. . .Umemuro. . . .

193

osseus

. . Petaloides

. Europe

. . . Kalchbrenner .

. 191

ovinus

. .Ovinus

. Europe

. . . Schaeffer

. 167

pachypus*. .

. .Spongiosus

. Cuba

. . . Montagne ....

.159

palpebralis

. . Melanopus

. South America . .

. . . Leprieur

. 184

pansus

. . Lignosus

. South America . .

. . . Berkeley

. 125

partitus

. .Lentus

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

. 175

Paucheri*

. .Melanopus

.New Caledonia. .

. . . Patouillard . . .

. 180

Paulensis*

. . Lignosus

.Brazil

. . .Hennings

. 126

Peckianus

. .Lentus

. United States . . .

. . . Cooke

. 171

penetralis

. . Petaloides

. Exotic

. .Smith

. 132

perennis

. . Pelloporus

. Europe

. . .Linnaeus

. 164

perversus*
Pes caprae

. . Petaloides
. .Ovinus

. Philippines
.Europe

. . .Copeland
. . . Persoon

. 136

. 167

petalif ormis

. . Petaloides

. Cuba

. . . Berkeley

. 142

petalodes

. . Petaloides

.Brazil

. . . Berkeley

. 133

picipes*

. . Melanopus

.Europe

. .Fries

. 180

pictus

. . Pelloporus

. Europe

. ..Schulter

. 164

pisachapani*

. .Ganodermus

Java

. .Nees

. 107

placopus

. .Ganodermus

Java

. . . Leveille

105

platotis . *

. . Petaloides

.Australia

. . Berkeley

137

Pocula

. . Petaloides

. United States

. .Schweinitz

140

podlachicus*

. . Melanopus

.Europe

. . Bresadola

183

politus*

. .Ovinus

.Europe

. .Fries

167

polydactylus*

. . Lignosus

.Brazil

. . Berkeley

126

popanoides

. .Ovinus

.Mauritius

. . Cooke

167

porphyritis

. Petaloides (Micro.)

.Brazil

. . Berkeley

142

praetervisus*

. .Amaurodermus

. Brazil

. . Patouillard . . . .

113

Preussii

. . Lignosus

. Africa

. . Hennings

124

pseudoperennis. . .

. Lentus

. Africa

. . Hoist

174

pterygodes*

. . Petaloides (Micro.)

. Africa

. .Fries

143

pudens*

. . Lignosus

.India

. . Berkeley

126

Puiggarianus

. . Spongiosus

.Brazil

. .Hennings

160

pusillus (bis)

. Melanopus

.South America. . .

. .Fries

185

pusiolus

. . Petaloides

.East Indies

. . Cesati

140

Puttemansii

. . Melanopus

.Brazil

. .Hennings

183

radiato-scruposus .

.Melanopus

.Brazil

. . Hennings

187

radicatus

.Ovinus

. United States . . . .

. . Schweinitz

168

Ramosii*

.Amaurodermus. . . .

. Philippines

. .Murrill

111

206

INDEX VALID SPECIES.

regulicolor*
renatus
renidens
rcpando-lobatus*. . .
Repsoldi*
rctiporus*
rhinocerotis
Rhipidium
rhizomatophorus .
rhizomorphus. . . .
rhizophilus
Ridleyi
rivulosus
Rostkovii*
rubidus
rubro-castaneus. .
rudis
rufescens
rugosus
russiceps
rutrosus*
Sacer
sanguineus
Sapurema
scabriceps
Schomburgkii. . . .
Schweinitzii
scopulosus
sericatus
sideroides
sicnnaecolor*
sordulentus*
Sprucei

squamatus
squamosus
stereinus
subbulbipes*
subf ulvus
subvirgatus
sulphureus
superpositus
talpae
Tasmanicus
Tiliac*
tomentosus
tricholoma
triqueter*

tristiculus
Tuba
tuberaster
tumulosus
turboformis
umbellatus
umbilicatus
unilaterus
(unnamed)
vadosus
valesiacus*

. .Ganodermus. . ,
. . Amaurodermus
. .Amaurodermus
. .Lentus
. .Spongiosus. . .
. .Merismus
. . Lignosus
. . Petaloides
. . Lignosus
. . Melanopus
. . Lentus. . .

Cuba..
Brazil
Brazil
....Brazil
Brazil
.... Australia
....Malay
United States. . .
... .Brazil
South America . .

...Cooke....
. - . Berkeley
. . . Brcsadola
Spegazzini
. . . MoeIU-r

PAGE
104

120
115
172
159
154
122
131
126
182
174
152
111
168
133
183
111
157
110
138
130
122
144
166
171
119
159
128
120
160
144
154
111

168
168
142
161
144
172
153
122
149
168
175
160
170
160
x>n)
139
177
166
168
194
150
171
117
107
183
102

...Cooke
. . . Cooke
. Berkeley
. . Ili-iiniii^-
. . . Montagne
. . .Patouill.ini
...Massee
Patouillard

. . Merismus

. .Amaurodermus
. .Ovinus (Melan.
. . Petaloides
. .Melanopus. . . .
. .Amaurodermus
. . Spongiosus
. .Amaurodermus
. . Petaloides
. . Petaloides
. . Lignosus
. . Petaloides
. .Ovinus
. .Lentus
. .Amaurodermus.
, . Spongiosus ....
. . Lignosus
. .Amaurodermus.
. Spongiosus
Petaloides

Java . .

) . . . Europe

. . . Fries

. . . .Ceylon
. ...Perak...
... .Tasmania
.... Europe
Java

. . . Berkeley .
Ki.lk-v
. . . Berkeley
. . . Persoon
Nees

.... Ceylon
.... Europe
.... Africa
.... South America . .
.... Brazil
.... Cuba
.... South America . .
. . . .Europe
.... Australia
.... Africa
. . . .Java

. . . Berkeley
. . . Rostkovius ....
. . . Fries
. . .Linnaeus
...Moeller
. . . Berkeley
. . . Berkeley
. . .Fries
. . . Berkeley
...Holland
...Leveille
...Cooke
Montagne

Chili

.Amaurodermus.

.Ovinus
.Ovinus (Melan.)
. Petaloides
, .Spongiosus. . . .
. Petaloides
.Lentus
.Merismus
.Lignosus
.Merismus
.Ovinus
.Lentus
.Spongiosus. . . .
.Lentus. .......
.Spongiosus. . . .

. Petaloides
.Lentus
.Ovinus
.Ovinus
.Pelloporus. . .
. Merismus . .
.Lentus
.Amaurodermus.
.Ganodermus. . .
.Melanopus. . . .
.Ganodermus. . .

Brazil

Patouillard

.... Europe
. . . .Europe
.... Cuba
.... South America . .
....Cuba
India

(orig. Berkeley)
. . . Kalchbrenncr . .
. . . Fries
...Berkeley
. . .Hennings
...Berkeley
. . . Cave

. . . .Europe
. . . .Australia
... .Brazil...
. . . .Tasmania
Europe
. . .Europe
....Cuba
. . . .Europe

South America. .
. . . .Cuba
. . . .Europe
Australia
. . . . India
. . . .Europe. . . .
. . . .India
....Brazil
.. .Africa (?)
West Indies

. . . Fries
Berkeley

. . . Cooke
. . .Massee
. . .Schulzer
. . .Fries
. . . Montagne
. . . Fries
(Name orig. Per*
. . . Montagne
. . . Berkeley
. . .Fries
. . . Cooke
. . . Krumbiegcl . . .
. . .Viviani
Berkeley
. . . Spruce . . .

Duss. . !

. . . .Europe. . .
207

. ..Boudier

INDEX VALID SPECIES.

valla tus
variabilis
varius
veluticeps
vernalis
vernicosus

. . . Pelloporus
. . . Amaurodermus . .
. . . Melanopus
. . . Melanopus
. . . Lentus

. . .India
...Brazil
. . .Europe
. . .Africa
. . . Europe
Brazil

. . . . Berkeley . . .
. . . . Berkeley . . .
. . . . Persoon ....
. . . . Cooke
. . . .Fries
Berkeley

PAGE
. . . 162
. .. Ill

. . . 180
. .. 182
. .. 171
182

vernicipes
virgatus
Warburgianus

. . . Petaloides
. . . Lentus
Melanopus

. . .Japan
. . . Cuba
East Indies

Berkeley . . .
. . . . Berkeley . . .
Hennings

. . . 144
. . . 172
186

Wrightii
Wynne!
Xanthopus
Xerophyllus
Zambesianus
Zelandicus

. . . Melanopus
. . . Merismus
. . .Lentus (Micro.)-
. . . Melanopus
. . . Lignosus
. . .Merismus

...Cuba
. . . Europe ..."
. . . Africa
. . . New Zealand . . ,
. . . Africa
. . . New Zealand . . ,

. ...Murrill
. . . . Berkeley . . .
. . . .Fries
. . . Berkeley . . .
. . . . Buchanan . .
...Cooke

. . . 183
. . . 150
. .. 173
. . . 186
. .. 128
. .. 149

208

LETTER No. 25.

List of specimens received at Paris I',-,,,,, countries (other than th- l'.,it,.(l
States) from November, 1908, up to my departure for England, .lainmn TJ.
1909. At the time this letter is issued I am at Kevv Gardens, England, but I
inist my correspondents will continue to send their packages to in,
address, and I will advise them in regard to them as soon as they come into
my hands.

New Species.— While I think there are very fe\\ " new species" in Europe
or the. United States, they are constantly being received by me from
countries. I do not claim to be able to recognize them, however, excepting
in the Gastromycetes, which I have studied specially for the past six or eight

years with a view to learning the <>!<! species. As I do not make a practit f

naming and "discovering" new species excepting when working on a mono-
graph or other systematic work, I much prefer that my correspondents \\ho
send in new species should name and describe them them>fl\e-. In these
Letters I indicate the unnamed species that reach me, and if the send'
sire to publish them, it is perfectly agreeable to me. I shall not do ii
it comes in connection with systematic work. Isolated descriptions of IH-«
species as usually published are very much of a form, and not one out of ten
can be recognized from the publication. At the same time we have to have
names for plants, but I would much prefer that some one else would propose
them when I have occasion to use them.

Please note my recent change of address in Paris, which is now.

C. G. LLOYD,

January, 1909. 63 rue Muffon,

Paris. France.

BARRIER, MAURICE, France:
Trametes hispida (?).

BERNARD, DR. CHAS., Java:

Scleroderma (unnamed). IVridium brlijlit >/>'ll<nr. thin, smooth, with
a short, rooty base. Gleba lead color. Spores small, 5-6 mic., rtry tl'njhtly
rough. This is the only bright yellow Scleroderma I ever saw.— Scleroderma
Geaster, yellow form, (very doubtful or new species). It has the general ap-
pearance of being unopened Scleroderma GeMter, but is immature, and of
course we can not say that it would dehisce like Scleroderma ti.-a-t.-r. The
peridium is thinner than the European plant and when broken is bri,,
low.— Scleroderma verrucosum. Practically the same plant as the KM-
form — Cyathus sphaerosporus (or very close). Spores 16 x 18, subglo1
Scleroderma nitidum-Cyathus Montague!, although 1 have never strnli.-.
type, I do not question that it is also Cyathus bjMfMdU whirl. Junghoh
u'red from Java. Spores are 12 x 20.— Cyathus Montagu. -i. Same as t
ceding, but the cups are darker .-Cordyceps (sp.)-Xylaria (T
but unknown to me.— Hypocrea (sp.).

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS A

JAN 2 0 1942

BONNET, PAUL, France :

Polystictus perennis (undeveloped). — Tremella frondosa. Fresh
specimens, and the first I have seen.

BRACE, L. J. K., Bahamas:

Cyathus pallidus, spores in this collection 10x12— Cyathus (unnamed).
It belongs to Section 4 of "The Nidulariaceae," but unlike all others of this
section it does not have pale cups, but dark ones. Spores are 16 x 20.— Lenzites
striatus — Geaster velutinus (form). It is exactly the same as Plumier's old
figure on which Fries based Geaster saccatus. Not the same, however, as the
plant so generally known in temperate regions, nor I think as the " type '' at
Upsala.— Guepinia spathulata (or very close)— Pyrenomycetes — Clathrus
Americanus, a new species that will be published shortly in a synopsis on
which I am at work, of the phalloids of the world. I have received this same
plant before, also a photograph of it from Rev. A. Schupp, Brazil. It is
of the same general form and size as Clathrus pusillus of Australia, but has
the back of the arms creased.— Simblum (sp.) Probably small S. sphaero-
cephalum.

BRANDIS, REV. E., Bosnia:

Panis rudis — Lenzites saepiaria — Pleurotus sapidus — Polystictus hir-
sutus— Fomes pinicola— Polystictus pergamenus— Polystictus versicolor.

BUTIGNOT, DR., Switzerland:

Polyporus. Something unique and rare. I do not know it, and have
never seen it in any of the museums. I suspect that it is Polyporus corrugis,
but it is not the plant that I have received from a correspondent under this
name.

CEPEDE, C., France:
Bovista plumbea.

DESSENON, MONSIEUR. France:

Trametes Bulliardii— Fomes Euonymus— Trametes gibbosa— Daedalea
unicolor— Polystictus zonatus. By French mycologists usually determined as
a form of versicolor.— Polystictus 'versicolor— Polyporus adustus— Lc-nzites
betulina.

GALLAGHER, W. J., Malay States:

Scleroderma (?) immature. No spores found. The peridium is much
more yellow than any European species.

HARIOT, P., France:

Podaxon Farlowii (from Mexico.)— Polyporus corruscans (on pine?)
Sent to Bresadola, who referred it to "Pol. Friesii, Bres." Cystidia none.
Spores numerous, colored, 4^x6, smooth. Probably the same as I got in
Sweden, and, while the man who brought it to the museum stated it was found
on pine, that is dubious. — Polyporus Braunii, Cherbourg in hothouse. This
species introduced from some tropical country is well established in hothouses
in Europe. — Fomes officinalis, from the Hautes Alpes, on Laricis. A fine
specimen of a rare species. — Hrxagqna Dybowskii, from the Congo — Gano-
derma colossus. This species which is said to be frequent in Africa has other

names, but having studied the type at Upsa la I f,-,-| MI,-,. ,,f it, identity a*
above.— Gyrodontium (viz. Hydnum with colored ip H unknown,

from Cuba.— Fomes robustus, on oak, near 1'aris. I tun told tliis i> what is
called igniarius in France.-" Fomes Hartgii." co-type, but theu
robustus, except as to host.— Lenzites tricolor.

JAAP, PROFESSOR OTTO, Germany.

Poria calcea (as labeled)— Polyporus leucomolns— Lenzites sa«-pinrin —
Poria rancida (?)— Poria rhodella (?) on Fagus— Polyporus amorph
supinate)— Poria rhodella (?) on Salix— Polyporus brumalis.

KLINCKSIECK, PAUL, France.

Polyporus cuticularis— Polyporus radiatus Polystictus pergamenui
(From Mr. Jahandiez, Carqueranne).

LLOYD, DR. F. E., Mexico.

Battarrea Digueti (cfr. Tylostomeae p. 7, pi. 75). A number of fine

specimens, every one with the peridium attached, which is the ch-iru

this species, if it has any.

LUDWIG, MONSIEUR, France :

Trametes (resupinate) — Irpex defonnis, also " deformed " = Irpcx
paradoxa — Granularia (sp.) — Sebacina (?) — Helicobasidium purpureun,
Patouillard). — Fomes robustus, on oak. M. Ludwig tells me it is frequent
around Paris. The French botanists call it Fomes igniarius, but it has context
of a different color. — Fomes igniarius (on poplar). — Trametes Hulliardii, or as
we would call it in America, Daedalea confragosa, but we do not have this deep
red form, called Trametes Bulliardii in Europe.— Poria radula, and two Porias
unknown to me.

MASSALONGO, PROFESSOR C., Italy :

Polyporus rutilans (rare in Italy)— Polystictus versicolor (very dark
form) — Hirneola auricula-Judae.

M1LLE, KEY. L., Ecuador:

Lycoperdon polymorphum — Bovista nigrescens — Calvatia lilacina
(form). A marked form and entitled to a name, and Spegazzini I think has a
name for it. It has no sterile base. Spores are small, 4-5 mic. and not strongly
rough. Color of the gleba dark purplish. It is close to what we call v« r
dentalis in the United States.— Catastoma, called Catastoma Pila (ims.) in
the United States, but never described. The spores of these South American
plants are not so strongly pedicellate as our plant, but I think the same thing.
I have also seen the same plant collected by Robert K. Fries in nnrth.-rn Ar-
Kentina.-Catastoma circumscissum. This has the general appearance of being
C. subterraneum, but has small spores.

NAVAS, REV. L., Spain:

Paxillus pannoides, on timbers in a mine.

O'CONNOR, CHAS. A., Mauritius:

Calvatia Gardner!, beautiful specimen. Cva.hus Berk.-leyanus.
Spores 5 x8 to 6x12. This species corresponds to Cyathus striatus -,f Europe.
excepting its small spores. -Lycogala Epidendrum-Cyathus tnplex (,

Nidulariaceae p. 23) Spores 12x20. — 'Cyathus Poeppigii, I find no spores, but
do not question the species — Cyathus stercoreus, small-spored form. Spores
globose, 20 mic. in diameter.

PATOUILLARD, PROFESSOR N., France:
Gautieria morchelliformis (from the Jura.)

PIERRHUGUES,. DR., France:

Fomes rubriporus, on Quercus— Fomes pomaceus, on Primus— Fomes
pinicola,on Pin us pineo — Trametes hispida,on Populus — Polyporus cuticularis,
on Quercus— Polystictus perennis, on burnt ground — Fomes (unknown to me)
on Lauras, at Toulon.

READER, F. M., Victoria:

Lycoperdon nigrum (cfr. Lye. Aust. p. 30) — Stereum hirsutum — Mor-
chella conica — Stereum (sp.) Section Podoscypha — Geoglossum, belongs to
the section with black clubs and hyaline spores. No species of that section is
included in the Australian Handbook — Lysurus (unnamed species) sent in
formalin. It is quite different from anything known, having a short, quadran-
gular stem and an arm at each corner. I hope Mr. Reader will be able to se-
cure a photograph of it. I have labeled it (ad interim) Lysurus brevipes, but
should be quite glad to adopt another name if Mr. Reader will publish a good
account of the phalloid and name it.

ROLFE, F. AV., England:
Scleroderma aurantium.

TEPPER, J. G. O., Soutli Australia:

Clathrus gracilis, the most frequent phalloid in Australia — Sclero-
derma aurantium — Polysaccum pisocarpium — Catastoma hyalothrix (cfr. Lye.
Aust. p. 27). I think this is the first time the species has reached me.

VAN BAMBEKE, PROF. CHAS., Belgium:

Lycoperdon umbrinum — Polyporus biennis — Polyporus radiatus — Dae-
dalea unicolor — Ceriomyces albus.

WOULFF, E., Austria:

Fomes fomentarius — Trametes (unknown to me) close to pini, I think,
but has small pores. Similar setae, however. Spores hyaline. On Picea. —
Polyporus pubescens (?) — Irpex lacteus — Trametes odorata — Lycoperdon pra-
tense— Trametes trabea, in the sense of Bresadola.— Polyporus (unknown to
me) — Scleroderma verrucosum — Polystictus hirsutus — Polyporus fumosus (?)
— Polyporus montanus. The first specimen I ever saw. Spores globose, 6-7
mic., hyaline, echinulate. A good species, and the only one in Europe known
with such spores. It is close to Polyporus Berkeley! of the United States. —
Stereum hirsutum-.

LETTER No. 26.

KK\V (ivuhicN-. KM. i NM,, .I,,,,. 1909.

List of specimens from the United States ami Canada tluit wen- sent to
my address at Cincinnati, Ohio, and shipped to me at I'ln-i*. !• mnr,. I .
her, 1908.

\Ve thank our many friends for the liberal collections of polyporuid* during
the season of 1908. It is only by the handling of an abundance of m.Mierial
that anything approximating the truth can be learned eoureniing the fungi.
The mistakes and blunders of mycology (and a large part of the pub-
lished accounts fall under that head) are largely due to inadequate unit. -rial
and opportunities, supplemented by the personal vanity of th.»e who like to
see their names in print. The names of specimens used in this Letter are ac-
cording to the usual nomenclature of American mycology. They are in
keeping with the traditions of the subject, but as often emphasized in previous
Letters, I claim no critical knowledge of fungi except as to Gastromycetes.

C. G. LLOYD,

Court and Plum Sta.,

Cincinnati, Ohio.
BARTLETT, H. H., Georgia:

Polyporus gilvus— Polystictus pergamenus— Polystictus pergamenus
var. laceratus — Polystictus versicolor — Lenzites corrugata — Lycoperdon fuli-
gineum, rare and of a southern distribution only.— Lycoperdon gemmatum —
Stereum bicolor (fine specimens)— Stereum complicatum— Lenzites betulina.

BATES, REV. J. M., Nebraska:

Polystictus cinnabarinus— Lenzites saepiaria- Panus rudis — Lyco-
perdon cepaeforme— Fomes pomaceus— Cyathus stercoreus— Daedalea confra-
gosa— Panus ?— Lycoperdon umbrinum.

BRENCKLE, DR. J. F., North Dakota:

Secotium acuminatum, fine specimens— Bovistella (cfr. dealbata and
Letter No. 20)— Calvatia lilacina, var. occidental is— Lycoperdon (unnamed).
It belongs to the polymorphum group, having the same capillitium and /.. < .,'mr
sterile base. It differs from all named species of this group, with its gener-
ally obese form and distinctly rough spores. Some of the specimen- have
" soldered " warts which, however, I think are an atrophied condition.

BROWN, CHAS. E., Wisconsin:

Geaster hygrometricus— Scleroderma flavidum-I'olj -pm-iis. on white
oak, unknown to me.

CLUTE, W. N., Illinois:

Geaster hygrometricus-Trametes hispida— Trametes hixpida .thin
form)— Polyporus ' Spraguei— Polyporus (unknown to me. Perhaps a form of
Spraguei)— Secotium acuminatum— Genster triplex— Scleroderma an rantium—

' AT LOS A

i AM on in/o

Scleroderma tenerum— Lenzites saepiaria— Polystictus cinnamomeus (Pol.
Issue page 6. I am beginning to doubt the reference of our American plant
to the European species. I do not find exactly the same in Europe. It is
Polystictus parvulus of Klotz, certainly !)— Fomes Everhartii— Lycoperdon
subincarnatum — Crucibulum vulgare — two Pezizas unknown to me— Daedalea
confragosa — Tremella foliacea. I am well acquainted now with this species
in Europe. I think Mr. Clute's specimens are the same, but would not be
sure without a comparative study. It is not a frequent plant in the United
States.

DAVIS, SIMON, Massachusetts:

Cyclomyces Greenii. Formerly reputed to be a very rare plant, but it
has reached me a number of times. — Hydnum imbricatum — Stereum fasciatum
—Polystictus cinnabarinus — Hydnum repandum, form rufescens — Daedalea
confragosa, trametoid form — Hydnum (unknown tome) — Polyporus rutilans —
Hydnum adustum — Polyporus aurantiacus "on maple." I thought it only
grew on hemlock. — Polystictus cinnamomeus — Polyporus elegans — Polystictus
versicolor (pale form) — also four collections of polyporoids unknown to me. —
Polyporus brumalis -Polyporus, unknown to me, close to gilvus, but no
"setae." — Polyporus admirabilis. This specimen is firmer and harder than
Professor Peck's specimen as I remember it, and I am not sure it is the same,
but very close. — Polyporus carneus. In my opinion not the same as Fomes
roseus of Europe, many " authorities " to the contrary notwithstanding.

FISHER, G. C., Ohio:

Stereum rubiginosum — Polystictus conchifer — Polyporus adustus —
Fomes Ohiensis— Panus rudis.

FISHER, G. C., New York:

Polystictus cinnabarinus — Stereum ochraceo-flavum — Irpex cinna-
momeus— Clavaria fusiformis — Daedalea quercina — Stereum sericeum— Scle-
roderma aurantium— Fomes leucophaous (brown) — Polyporus Spraguei — Ex-
idia glandulosa- -Polyporus pocula. The smallest Polyporus known. This was
on cherry. Its usual host is chestnut-oak. — Fomes rimosus — Geaster hygro-
metricus — Polyporus betulinus — Polyporus (sp.) — Polystictus pergamenus —
Polystictus versicolor — Daldinea concentrica — Daedalea confragosa — Poly-
stictus (cfr. hirsutulus) — Favolus Europaeus, form microporus — Cantharellus
cinnabarinus.

!• ( >\VLER,-. TAMES, Canada :

Lenzites saepiaria — Polystictus pergamenus — Lycoperdon subincar-
natum— Polyporus (species unknown to me).— Polyporus Schvveinitzii — Len-
tinus lepideus.

GARRETT, A. O.,Utah:

Morchella (cfr. conica)— Polyporus alboluteus.

GOESSEL, OH AS., Wisconsin :
Daldinea concentrica.

HILL, OSCAR, Massachusetts;
Hydnum graveolens.

HONK. DAISY M., Minnesota:

Phlebia rubiginosa— Fomes salicinus— Polyporus gilvus (?) " on living
lilacs, killing the branches." These specimens are black on top. I find no
setae on these, and the determination is doubtful— Fomes Everhartii — St. T. urn
complicatum?— Bovista plumbea— Polyporus adustus, resupiimt.- I'ulyporus
(cfr. arcularius)— Lenzites betulina— Polystictus conchifer— Boletinus po-
rosus— Geaster Smithii, the second collection made in th«- I'nit.-d State*. The
first was from Florida.— Geaster limbatus, tending toward rufescens— Cal-
vntia lilacina— Bovista pila— Fomes leucophaeus. n brownish form tending
toward applanatus of Europe, but much harder thnn the European specie*.—
Secotium acuminatum — Fomes leucophaeus (typical) — Polyporus Sohweinitzii
— Lenzites vialis cor trabea, teste Bresadola)— Polyporus adustus— Foim>8 pini-
cola— Poria tulipifera— Polyporus gilvus (unusually thick form)— Sten-um
tattMcinum— Fomes fomentarius — Polyporus picipes— Fomes, unknown to me
(cfr. laevigatus) — Poria, unknown to me — Fomes conchatus — Polystictut per-
jramfmis (rosette form)— Polystictus versicolor— Irpex lacteug— Daedalea
confrngosa— Poly poms carneus — Polyporus "resinosus" — Daedalea uniroL.r
Fomes ribis - Stereum fasciatum — Fomes leucophaeus — Polystictus vehitinux
(true, I think)— Polyporus, something very peculiar, but entirely unknown to
me. — Polyporus adustus, a thick velutinate form— Lycoperdon piriforme— Ly-
coperdon nigrescens (?) — Lycoperdon Wrightii — Polyporus resinosus— Fomes
leucophaeus.

JACKSON, H. S., New Jersey:
Geaster hygrometricus.

LANE, R. H., California:
Bovista plumbea.

LANGTON, THOMAS, Canada:

Polystictus hirsutus— Polystictus versicolor— Polystictus pergaimMuis
—Irpex lactea (fine specimen)— Daedalea unicolor— Lenzites vialis— Stereum
sericeum— Phlebia radiata— Lenzites saepiaria, trametoid form— Sten-uin ru-
gosum (?)— Daedalea confragosa— Polyporus albellus— Polyporus gilvu«—
Polyporus rutilans -Polyporus betulinus— Polyporus adustus— Favolos Euro-
paeus— Polyporus pubescens (?)— Polyporus elegans— Panus stipticus— Foiue*
nigricans?— Xylaria polymorphum — Fomes pinicola-Schizophyllmn
mune— Hydnum (sp.)— Hydnum aurantium-Lenzites h,.tulina-Daldinea
concentrica— Polyporus d is tortus— Polyporus radicatus-Thelephora inty-
l,.K.(.a (?)— Daedalea confragosa— four Myxomycetes and two Hypoxylon spe-
cies unknown to me.— Discomycetes, unknown to me.

MARSH, JOSEPH W., Oregon:

Bovista pila— Lycoperdon cepaeforme-Lycoperdo

NOBLE, MRS. M. A., Florida:
Trametes hydnoides.

RICKER, P. L., Washington, D. C. :

(Specimens fro.n various localities.) Polystictus perenm.-Pol,-
stictus hirsutus-Stereum versicolor-Polyporus arcularm,
Curtisii aslal,eled-l>..ria subacida-Irpex lactea-Hydnum Aur,

Pleurotus nidulans — Marasmius rotula — Stereum rufum, as known to Fries.
In America it is called Hypocrea Richardsoni, Corticium pezizoideum and
Tubercularia pezizoidea. — Daedalea unicolor.

SETCHELL, W. A., California:

Elasniomyces russuloides (type specimens.)

SMITH, T. L., Massachusetts:

Polyporus elegans — Polystictus pergamenus — Stereum tabacinum —
Polystictus (uanamed, I think). Close to Pol. cuticularis, Pol. Issue, page 12.
— Fomes leucophaeus, typical. In my opinion very different from Fomes ap-
planatus of Europe— Polyporus Schweinitzii— Unknown to me. I have col-
lected the same thing in Canada, but never found any hymenium. — Polystictus
cinnabarinus-^Trametes (sp. unknown to me) — Irpex cinnamomeus — Fomes
fornentarius— Fomes connatus— Paxillus Curtisii (illustrated by Atkinson as
a " new species," Paxilluscorrugatis) — Polyporus radiatus — Polyporus auran-
tiacus, a rare plant — Geoglossum hirsutum — Poria violacea of Fries! ! (=Mer-
ulius Ravenelii of Berkeley and Poria taxicola of Bresadola) — Polystictus
velutinus (true, I think) — Poria (close to " obliqua" of U. S., not of Europe)
— Daedalea confragosa— Polyporus carneus of the U. S. Professor Peck is
surely right. It is quite different from Fomes roseus of Europe, notwith-
standing " authorities" to the contrary.— Polyporus albellus— Daedalea uni-
color — Poria tulipifera — The following eight species were named by Rev.
Bresadola: Hydnum caeruleum — Hydnum suaveolens. These had an even
top. As I have observed it in Europe it is colliculose— Hydnum fuligineo-
album — Hydnum scobiculatum — Hydnum ferrugineum — Hydnum aurant-
iacum — Peniophora aurantia — Peniophora incarnata.

STERLING, E. B., New Jersey:

Mr. Sterling is my most liberal correspondent. He sends specimens
in great variety and quantity.

Thelephora Schweinitzii — Thelephora merismatoides — Sebacina in-
crustans — Poljporus hispidus, on black oak. A rare plant in northern United
States, and this is the first time we have received it excepting from Florida.—
CalVatia rubro-flava. Mr. Sterling finds it in a " wild " situation. It usually
grows only in cultivated ground. — Thelephora vialis — Hydnum adustum —
Hydnum, related to adustum, but surely different. A new form or a " new
species" I think. — Hydnum velutinum — Polyporus Curtisii— Trametes (sp.
unknown to me) — Irpex (cfr. deformis) — Hypoxylon (sp.) — Stereum compli-
catum — Fuligo septica — Polystictus hirsutus, abnormal — Irpex lactea — Irpex
cinnamomeus — Favolus Europaeus — Pleurotus nidulans — Leotia lubrica —
Polystictus conchifer — Polystictus (cfr. focicola) — Daedalea quercina,a liberal
collection — Polyporus frondosus, very fine specimens — Many Clavarias, not
determinable by me — Polyporus, species unknown to me, but interesting.
A large number of specimens in addition to these, sent by Mr. Sterling, will be
acknowledged in the next letter.

LETTER No. 27.

List of specimens received since last reported. My best thanks are
extended to those who continue to send me specimens.

C. G. LLOYD.

January, 1910. 63 rae Buffon

Paris, France.
ALLEN, D. B., England:

Fomes connatus, on ash.
ARNOULD, MONSIEUR, France:

Lenzites betulinus — also three Hydnums unknown to me.
BECKER, DR. H., South Africa:

Phellorina strobilina (cfr. Australian Lycoperdaceae, p. 10). This
is the first record of this species other than the Australian, and it is a
rare species in Australia.— Geaster saccatus — Geaster pectinatus— Cyathus
vernicosus — Polyporus, species unknown to me, but close to brumalis, though
quite distinct.

BERNIN, A., Monaco:

Polyporus lucidus— Fomes applanatus— Daedalea quercina (ab-
normal).

BIERS, MONSIEUR, France:

Stereum hirsutum — Fomes annosus — Fomus fomentarius — Polyporus
adustus — Polyporus fragilis — Fomes pomaceus.
CAMUS, F., France:

Sclerodernia Geasteir, unopened, with a thick, >,nn,,th peridium. I
think the peridium is usually rough.
CAVANAGH, B. S., India:

Lentinus (sp.) Polyporus lucidus (typical form)— Polyporus (un-
named). I was sure when I received it that it could be nothing known unless
it was Polyporus vallatus, from India, at Kew. I have since compared It
with Polyporus vallatus and it is quite different.

CEPEDE, CASIMIR, France:

Polystictus versicolor — Lenzites betulina— Stereum hirsutum.
CHEESMAN, W. N., Canada:

Fomes pinicola (?? young)— Polyporus radiatus (?? It has setae and
Is too brightly colored)— Lenzites saepiaria?— Fomes salicinus? Polystictu:
(cfr. zonatus) — Polyporus distortus, approaches close to rufescens of Europe
— Poria viticola?

CROSSLAND, CHARLES, England:

Polyporus albidus, nice specimen on Abies— Polyporus varius—
Polyporus rutilans.

DESSENON, PROFESSOR, France:

Daedalea quercina— Polystictus versicolor— Merulius tremelh
Daedalea rufescens, fresh! Usually classed as a Polyporus, but the hymen
form of this specimen is a Daedalea.-Fomes applanatus (young
stictus hirsutus (rare near Paris) -Polyporus spumeus-
zites saepiaria— Lenzites betulina.

UNIVEEUITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 01942

DUMEE, MONSIEUR, France:

Daedalea confragosa, very peculiar form — Fomes annosus — Fomes
connatus — Polyporus adustus — Trametes Bulliardii — Polyporus Schweinitzii
— Trametes gibbosa — Fomes applanatus — Fomes igniarius — Fomes fomen-
tarius — Fomes pinicola — Fomes robustus, usually misdetermined in France
as igniarius. — Daedalea quercina — Daedalea quercina, polyporoid form called
Trametes hexagonoides by Quelet and Fries. — Polyporus, sp. unknown to
me — Polyporus brumalis — Polyporus stipticus — Polyporus lucidus — Solenia
anomala — Polyporus varius — Fomes fraxineus — Polyporus rutilans — Poly-
porus sp. unknown to me — Irpex fusco-violaceus — Pachyma Cocos (from
China) — Polyporus betulinus — Poria (sp.) — Xylaria polymorpha — Panus toru-
losus — Daedalea unicolor — Fomes laccatus (called resinosus in Quelet) —
Cyphella (?) — Polyporus amorphus, the brightest yellow form I ever saw. —
Poria contigua, exactly agreeing with Persoon's type at Leiden. — Trametes
hispida, closely approaching Bulliard's figure on which "Gallica" was based.
— Fomes nigro-laccatus (as labeled in museum at Paris)— Fomes (sp. un-
known to me.) The last two specimens are from some foreign country.

DUPONT, E., Reunion Island:
Lycoperdon piriforme.

FROGGATT, WALTER W., Solomon Islands:

Calvatia. Probably a new species. It has broad, flaccid, septate,
hyaline capillitium and is the first Calvatia I have noted with such a char-
acter. It is close to Calvatia Candida, which is common in Australia and
may be a form of it, although this species according to my records does not
have this broad capillitum. — Lycoperdon piriforme? Lycoperdon (unplaced
by me).

GIBBS, THOMAS, England:

Polyporus picipes (as labeled, but I doubt if it is different from
varius) — Polyporus adustus (pale form) — Polyporus varius— Polyporus fron-
dosus.

GRELET, L. J., France:

Daedelea quercina— Polysaccum crassipes, a fine, large specimen
measuring 26 cm. high and the stem 6 cm. thick.

HAGLUND, ERIK, Sweden:

Trametes odorata — Poria laevigata — Poria eupora — Poria vulgaris,
on frondose wood, not I think the true which is a pinewood species. — Poly-
porus caesius — Polyporus vulpinus, fine specimens. Rare. It develops how-
ever, that it is the same as Polyporus rheades of Persoon's herbarium. —
Polyporus destructor (as named, unknown to me) — Polystictus zonatus —
Merulius serpens (so labeled).

HARIOT, P., France:

Lenzites repandus (from French. Guiana) — Lentinus Tuber-regium
(from Madagascar) — Trametes hispida (from southern France). A most
rare form with yellow context. It was so referred by Professor Patouillard,
which I was at first inclined to, doubt, but on comparing it with the ordinary
form I think it is correct. It is a color form. It has no special name, I
think, though well entitled to one. — Polyporus brumalis (?) (France).

2

HUTCHINGS, S., Bengal:

A nice collection of tropical species of much Interest to me. Poly-
stictus sanguineus-Polystictus nabelliformis-Polystictus xanthopus-Poly-
stictus gallo-pavonis-Trametes Mulleri-Lenzites repanda-Polyporus (un-
known to me but close to gilvus)-also two Trametes and two Lenzltcs
species unknown to me.

JAHANDIEZ, M. E., France:

Polystictus pergamenus— Polyporus lucidus— Polystlctus htrsutus.
JARVIS, E., Queensland:

An unnamed species of Bovistella and an interesting addition to
this genus. It has separate capillitium and apiculate spores, the first species
I have seen that does not have pedicellate spores. I have labeled It
Bovistella pusilla.

LIND, J., Denmark:

Fomes robustus — Poria contigua (so named).

MAIRE, PROFESSOR R., France:

Polystictus perennis— Daedalea unicolor — Polyporus radiatus— Poly-
porus spumeus — Polyporus amorphus (old?)— Polyporus stipticus — Polyporus
fumosus (old) Polyporus fumosus (young) — Fomes euonymus. — Also from
Sweden, Polyporus tephroleucus (?)— Polyporus (sp.?)— Polyporus pubes-
cens (?).

MANGIN, PROFESSOR, France:

From the exposition at Paris, 1909. Polyporus leucomelas. Ex-
actly agreeing with Gillet's figure. This is somewhat different from the
form I have collected in Sweden, as shown in Boudier's recent figure, and
raises the question if there are not two forms included in leucomelas. —
Geoglossum glabrum — Lenzites tricolor — Polyporus Wynnei, the first fresh
specimen I have ever seen. I was unable to name it and submitted It
to Rev. Bresadola. Polyporus Wynnei in my opinion has no relation to
Polystictus abietinus as found in Fries, nor to Polyporus fragllis as found
in Qu<?let. I would place it in the section Merisma.

MASSALONGO, PROFESSOR C., Italy:

Calvatia caelata (smooth form) — Lycoperdon pusillum— Tylostoma
mammosum — Lycoperdon atropurpureum (globose form) — Lycoperdon spa-
diceum — Lycoperdon (cfr. nigrescens).

O'CONNOR, CHARLES A., Mauritius:

Geaster subiculosus— Simblum periphragmoides, alcoholic specimen
and sketch. Mauritius is the original station for periphragmoides ("type
locality" as our Kunzeite friends call it.) However, these specimens have
the shape on which Simblum Texense was based and tend to the conclusion
that Texense is the same thing as periphragmoides.— Clathrus Fischerl.
alcoholic specimen and color notes which, for this time at least, place
Fischeri on a firm basis as a valid species. It was not recognized
"good" in my recent Synopsis on account of the inadequate "type" from
which little can be told. Clathrus Fischeri seems to be exactly the same
plant as Clathrus gracilis, so common in Australia, with this difference that

the African plant is yellow and the Australian is white. While we do
not hold that a color distinction alone makes a valid species, we do so
maintain if it is based on a geographical difference. Unless it is shown
that white species occur with the yellow in Africa, or yellow specimens
with the white in Australia, we shall hold that they are distinct.

PANAU, CHARLES, France:

Trametes hispida — Lenzites abietinus — Lenzites saepiaria — Poly-
porus fumosus — Polyporus adustus — Merulius tremellosus — Polyporus fra-
gilis (or mollis).

PATOUILLARD, PROFESSOR N., France:

Mitremyces Le Ratii, co-type from New Caledonia.

PIERRHUGUES, DR., France:

Fomes torulosus. Fine specimen on Laurus nobilis at Toulon.
Around Paris it is generally on oak. Usually known in France as Fomes
rubriporus, but it has recently developed that it is Persoon's species as
abundantly preserved in his collection- — Polyporus squamosus, on oak,
Hyeres, France. — Polyporus triqueter (in sense of Romell).

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Laschia pezizoidea — Laschia saccharina (many collections)— Poria
carneo-pallens — Calvatia (cfr. craniiformis) — Geaster pectinatus — Campanella
pezizo'idea (labeled by Rev. Rick "Merulius pezizoides, Speg." but it belongs
to Henning's genus.)

RODRIGUEZ Y LOPEZ NEYRA, DR. M., Spain:

Polystictus versicolor — Polystictus hirsutus — Trametes pini — Fomes
annosus — Polyporus lucidus — Polyporus sulphureus— Stereum hirsutum —
Trametes hispida.

ROUSSEAU, MADAME, France:
Polyporus adustus.

TURNER, MISS E. J., Australia:

Geaster saccatus — Polystictus oblectans, if really different from cin-
namomeus. These are very close to the American plant. — Thelephora (sp.) —
Stereum hirsutum — Polystictus sanguineus — Auricularia auricula-judae —
Hydnum (sp.) fragrant.

USSHER, C. B., Straits Settlements:

Clathrus multicolor, with photograph and color sketch. This is a
color form of Clathrus indusiatus (cfr. Synopsis, p. 20.)

VAN BAMBEKE, PROFESSOR CHARLES, Belgium:

Daedalea unicolor — Polyporus lucidus (sessile) — Daedalea quercina
— Fomes connatus — Poria versipora.

WASTENEYS, H., Australia:

Calvatia lilacina — Lepiota procera (or close).

WILSON, REV. JAMES, Australia:
Morchella conica.

f<-<"» Europe and ferciga cawtr»

hl!4

C. c.. I.I.OYD

Au*USt- 191(K '- ru, Buffo,,

Paris. France.
ACLOOrK, A., France:

Tvlostoma niaininoMini— Bovista ni.uresccns— Polvporn
inosus — Polystictus versicolor.

ALLEN, \V. B., England:

Koines annosns (very doubtful. not developed >
de BKLLAIXG. J., Kiitfland:

Polyporus bettilinus.
BKCKKR, DR. H., South Africa:

Mycenastrum Coriuin— Heater plicattis. Surely only a form
of Geaster pectinatus. — Podaxon carcionalis — Steremn <cfr. versicolor;
Sclerodenna verrucosuni — Psora (sp.) of lichen.
lU'RXARI), DR. CH., Java:

Aseroe arachnoidea (alcohol) — Simblum facile (alcohol) —
Jansia ru.uosa (three tubes, in one of which the hyineiiiuin tak«.-> .1
papillate form and would seem to indicate that Jansia di-yans is only a
modification of Jansia ru^osa. > — Lycoj^alopsis Solmsii, an extreinelv
rare genus and these are the first unquestioned sjieciniens I ha\
seen. — Peziza Hindsii, as compared at Kew. — Sclerodenna < unanied )

— Sclerodenna tenerum — Cyathus (sp.)' It belongs to section 4 < I'al
lida) of the KXMUIS. but I know no sj>ecies that exactly accords. Sjiore^
are abundant, when perfect are jjohosc. 2^ 11 mic. but many are im-
perfectly developed, more or less elliptical and smaller. — Lycoperdon
\Vri.uhtii (or close) — Geaster saccatus — Calvatia C.ardneri (probably'.

BOUDlER, P:., France:

Poly]iorus minusculus, co-type — Polyporus montanus. :
in Jura only. Spores.globose, tubercular. — Trametes Buti^notii, Bond.
As yet unpublished. The only Trametes found in Kurope with a me-
opodal stipe. At base of Abies in the Jura. — Poria sulphuiea-flavida
(determined by Prof . Maire.) — Polyporus Fonjui^noni. the first jrood
s]^ecimen I have seen of this collection. — (lastromyct-te? It -
to Scleroderma but has smooth, colored spores. Is it not the v;vnn««
Pompholyx( ? ) I think there is no specimen of this j,renus in any museum.
BROWN, OKO., New Zealand:

Geaster saccatus. unopened — Hydnocystia (?)J judKe an tin
named species of a most interesting K1-''11!^-
COTTOX.A. I)., Knjrlaiul:

Poria. on pine.
CRAD\\'ICK. \VM., Jamaica:

Geaster velutinus. nnopene;!. The e\o])eridium is usually
dark in the tropics, but these are as li-lit colored as if they had e,ro\vn
in temperate regions.

CROSSLAXD CHAKIJCS.. Ivn^laiul:

Pomes connatus — Polyporns' sp. •— Trametes snaveok-ns—
Fomes fraxineus— Merulius tremellosns—Polytsictus versicolor— I'..h
])orus frondosus— Polystictus abietinus— Polyporns (sp. — I'oh p«.rus
radiatus— Daedalea confragosa, trametoid form— Polvi-oni

— Polyi)orus adustus — Fomes ulmanus.

DRAKE, HENRY C., England:

Polyporus betulimis — Polystictus hirsutuson ash — Daedalea
qnercina — Polystictns versicolor — Fomes annosus.

EYRE, REV. W. L. W., England:

Fomes annosus, on fir — PAomes pomaceus, on plum.

FRIEvS, ROBERT, P., vSweden:

Lycoperdon absciss um, co-type from Bolivia — Catastoma Pila,
co-type from Argentina — Lanopila pygmea, co-type from Argentina.
All have recently been named and described by Mr. Fries, cfr. Myc.
Notes, p. 441.

FRY, MISvS AGNES, England:

Fomes applanatus, on elm — Fomes applanatus, on Ilex —
Fomes pomaceus, on Primus — Polystictus hirsutus, on elm(?).

GOETHART, J. W., Holland:

Polyporus talpae, very large specimen from Dutch Guiana.
It agrees exactly with the type at Ke\v. — Fomes pachyphloeus, as
named by Bresadola. It is the largest Ironies ever sent to Europe. It
came from Java. — Polyporus Japonicus (from Java). For me a form
of lucidus — Polyporus zonatus (from Java). A common species in the
tropics, with many names.

HARIOT, P., France:

Elaphomyces granulatus — P\>mes australis (from French Gui-
ana ) .

HAWLEY, H. C., England:

Polyporus Wynnii — Polyporus amorphus (?) white form —
Polyporus albidus (on Abies) — Polyporus (unknown to me) on ash.
It evidently belongs in the section with amorphus, dichrous, etc. —
Fomes ulmarius — Fomes fraxineus — Polyporus fumosus — Polyporus
rufescens — Trametes cervinus — Polyporus caesius — Polyporus flori-
formis — Polystictus zonatus (?) — Polyporus (four, species unknown )
— Poria (sp, ).

HEMET, L., Algiers:

Geaster hygrometricus.

HUTCHINGS, S., Bengal:

Polystictus sanguineus — Hexagona tennis — Hexagona albida
— Trametes Persoonii — Hirneola auricula-judae — Polystictus flavus, a
fine specimen. It is as good an Irpex as a Polystictus. As I have pub-
lished, it should bear Junghuhn's advertisement, not Klotzsch's as us-
ually given. — Daldinea concentrica — Polystictus hirsutus, pores cinere-
ous— Polystictus affinis — Lentinus dactyliophorus, the only species
known I think with an annulus — Polyporus, on the order of gilvus,
but not gilvus. — Tremella fuciformis, a fine specimen from which I
have a good photograph. When moistened it came out in a few minutes
as fresh and plump as if just collected. Spores are 8x10, apiculate, ell-
iptical-globose, hyaline, smooth. Basidia cruciate. — Trametes hololeuc-
us, according to specimens at Kew. It is close to Trametes Muelleri,
but I think somewhat different. It is a beautiful, white species, but not
a Polystictus". Species unnamed, I think. With a short, black base,
and white crust. Pores and context isabelline. — Lenzitesrepanda, a ?
form I think, though it has the pores and ordinary form of Trametes
Persoonii. — Lenzites with a "smoky top", not named I think. — Ster-
eum (sp.) — "vSistotrema" ochroleuca, same as type. This specimen is

an irpicoul form.— Polyporus (cfr. grammocephalus)— Poria (curious
species with large pores).— Trametes vcr>atilis— PoKporus <cfr luci'
dus( Sessile, with same context color, surface and appearance of luci
<lus, but spores are smooth and smaller. oxs.— Polystictus unknown
tome. If not called dealbatus, it might be so called as it appears "white
washed".— Polystictus, unknown to me. It has the same color and
appearciice as the Tabacimis section but there are no setae on the hv
eniuin. The spores (clearly seen ) are SUbglobo \. *m,Mtl\}

l»ale cotor. Hyphac deeply colored, slender.— PolystK'tus badius I bc-
lieveon comparison with the type at Kew. It has slightly smaller pores
and much smaller than those recently so referred from t IK- Philippines
— Hexagona tricolor, at least it is a form of Hexagona tennis with dark
reddish stain, and I suppose it to 1* the species as named by Fries, of
which no type exists. It is close if not the same as 1U \
— Lentinus Kurzianus, compared with thctypv at Kew. Its characters
are the scaly pilens and dark gills. When wet the gills are brown, but
on drying they become much darker, particularly on the ed^e. S|*>res
arc cylindrical, straight. 3J4 x lOmic., hyaline, MiKxith. — 1'olystii-
tns (s]>. ) — Lenzites (sj). ).

LAIXG, H. W.. New Zealand:

Lycoperdbn (sp.). Cortex gone, probably not determinate.
It belongs to the gemmatum jjjouj) with smooth spores and stroi.
umella. The deeply colored capillitium removes it from gemmatum or
piriforme. — Cyttaria (iiinnii. lierk. The genus Cyttaria is a most pe-
culiar genus, known only from extreme South America and Austral
asia. It is a Discomycete and grows on the branches of indigenous
Fagus. It was first brought to Europe by Darwin on hi^ \-o\a.^e around
the world, and was published by Berkeley. Darwin noted the plant as
quite abundant on semi-desert region of Patagonia and \\as used a^ a
food by the natives. I am very glad to obtain specimens of tlr-
ions genus for our museum.

LINDS. J., Denmark.

Poly poms cuticularis.

U'DWIG .MOXvSIHl'R. France:

Trametes pini (young) — Polyporus adustus — Odontia cristu-
lata? — Polyporus (sjj.) on birch — Polyporus fragilis— Polyporus stipt
icus.

MAIRK. PROF. R., France:

Fomes rob list us — Polystictus hirsutus (depauperate • .

McALPINE, D., Australia:

Jansia truncata. Type specimen in alcohol. Also photograph
and description.

MKNKZKS, CARLOS A., Madeira Islands:

Phallus impudicus (dried). This is not the type ton:
rope. The pileus is more bell shaped and yell. -wish. It is dose to the
form favosus of Java and very close to the form that occurs (rarely) in
Australia.

PANAU, CHARLES. France:

Poria medullae-panis— Fomes fraxineus—
Polystictus versicolor — Polystictus (sp. ).

I

PATOUILLARD, X., France:

Phvsalacria Orinocensis, co-type material.
FETCH, T., Ceylon:

Genus unknown to me. Gastromycete with very peculiar
spores with detersive spines.

RE A, CARLETON, England:

Fomes ulmarius — Fomes i)Otnaceus — Fomes fraxineus — Poly-
porus luciclus — Fomes applanatus (the abnormal form called vegettis)
— Fomes rib-is — Polyporus benzoinus — Trametes gibbosa — Poria pur-
purea.

ROLFS, P. H. England:

Polyporus lucidus — Polystictus versicolor — Poria versiportis
— Lenzites betulina — Polystictus perennis — Polyporus adustus — Poly-
porus lucidus — Fomes applanatus — Lycoperdcn gemmatum.
SALMON. 1C. S.. England:

Fomes pomaceus. A fine specimen. Professor Salmon writes
me that it is a destructive disease of the plum trees in England. —
Polyporus hispidus — P^omes laccatus, on beech, a rare plant.
SHADWELL, MISS B., England:

Fomes annosus (on Cornish elm) — Fomes applanatus (on
beech and ash) Polyporus adustus (on beech).
SMITH, E. HARTLEY, England:

Fomes ulmarius — Stercum hirsutum ( ? )
SWANTOX, E. W., England:

Fomes annosus (on Pintis sylv. ) — Fomes applanatus (on
beech) — Polyporus Schweinitzii (on larch) — Polyporus nodulosus
(on beech) — Polyporus leprodes (on a post) — Polyporus rutilans
(on beech) — Polyporus benzoinus (on Abies) — Fomes (resupinate,
on Pinus sylv. ) Unknown to me. Polyporus lucidus — Polystictus
versicolor — Polyporus radiatus — Poria laevigata (or close) on beech
and holly. — Poria versiporus.

WEIDMAX, ANT.. Bohemia:

Trametes odorata — Polyporus fumosus — Fomes igniarius
— Fomes roburneus, in the sense of Bresadola — Fomes fraxineus, on
pine ! ! Its usual host is frondose wood. — Fomes Hartigii — Fomes
robustus, on oak. — Fomes pomaceus, on Primus — Fomes pomaceus
on Platanus — Polyporus Schweinitzii — Lenzites protracta — Tram-
etes serialis — Lycoperdon pratense — Lycoperdon piriforme, form
growing in moss. — Lycoperdon piriforme var. cupricolor, see Myc.
Xotes p. 265. — Fomes annosus — Lycoperdon gemmatum — Poly-
stictus versicolor (?) Color is pale and pores are dusky. — Poria callosa
— Poria (sp.) — Polyporus adustus — Polyporus (unknown to me) —
Polyporus salignus (Bresadola refers it to imberbis) — Poria unknown
to me — Polyporus amorphus — Fomes annosus, resupinate — Poria
medullae-panis, I think. — Polyporus mollis — Fomes roburneus, teste
Bresadola. It was on birch and has same context color and texture as
igniarius,, but has a smooth black crust. It has abundant cystidia. —
Stereum ( H ymenochaete ) It has abundant, pale setae, partially color-
ed.— Trametes trabea — Corticium — Trametes pini — Poria — Tram-
etes (undeveloped) — Irpex (?) — Polyporus fragilis — Trametes gibb-
osa — Fomes pinicola — Polystictus zonatus — Polyporus fumosus —
Polyporus betulinus.

4

LETTER No. 29

List of specimens received from correspondents in the fniu-d
States and Canada since the last report. I extend my sincere- thanks
to all who send me specimens.

C. G. LLOYD,

Court and Plum Streets,

Cincinnati, Ohio.

AIKEN, W. H., Ohio:

Geaster rufescens— Tylostoma Uoydii. Professor Aiken finds this rarely
around Cincinnati, and he is the only one who does find it. The "species" is not
of much importance.

ALLEN, MISS LIZZIE C., Massachusetts:

BovistellaOhiensis, a rare plant in New England, common in the South.
Cordyceps ophioglossoides, with a sketch of the fresh plant.
AMES, FRANK H., New York.

Polyporus fumosus, true, I think.— Polystictus hirsutus (form)— Poly-
porus (sp.)— Guepinia spathulata— Stereum fasciatum— Fomes fomentarius— Poly-
porus gilvus— Thelephora (sp.)— Hydnum adustum— Polyporus lucidus- Hydnuni
velutinum— Daedalea unicolor, fauve form— Hydnum (sp.) —Polyporus ratOuu

— Daedalea confragosa, lenzitoid form — Crucibulum vulgare — Polystictus focicola
Polyporus (sp.) — Panus stipticus — Daedalea confragosa (tram etoid form)— Daedalea
quercina, curious. The position of the growing plant has evidently been reversed.
It has started a new hymeniuni on the under side and filled in the old pore mouths.

— Sehizophyllum commune— Polyporus radicatus, rarely reaches me. — Polyporus pi-
cipes — Lenzites protracta (Note 1) — Irpex pachylon — Fames leucophaeus I>.ml-
alea confragosa Polyporus (two species)— Stereum spadiceum — Thelephora albido-
brunnea, a beautiful specimen — Stereum purpureum — Radulum pallidum I'oly-
stictus hirsutus, white pored form — Polystictus conchifer — Trametes(sp.)- Poly-
porus cuticularis — Pleurotus nidulans — Stereum hirsutum — Polyporus alU-llu>
Stereum sericeum — Irpex lacteus— Polystictus pergamenus — Merulius tremellosus

— Irpex (sp.) — Polyporus frondosus — Polystictus hirsutus — Polyporus dichrou*
Panus rudis — Polystictus cinnamomeus.

BAKER, C F., California:

Scleroderma Cepa? In the gleba of this specimen are distinct threads or
hyphae, unusual in the genus Scleroderma.

BALLOU, W. H., New York:

Polyporus lucidus- Fomes leucophaeus— "Thelephora dendroidea" a
rare and somewhat mysterious species. Its spores and basidial characters an- un
known. Ganoderma sessile— Corticium. Sent as a Merulius, so it is probably
meruloid when fresh. There are several plants of this nature. Merulius fugax, in
the sense of Fries, is one of them though it is a Peniophora. A plant that is a
Merulius when fresh and a Corticium when dry gives rise to a legitimate difference
of opinion as to how it should be classed, as it may be placed in either genua.-
Polystictus abietinus (irpicoid form=fusco-violaceus )— Fomes rimosus- i
Everhartii, fine specimen. - Trametes pini— Fomes annosus— Radulum Ballouii
This was named "Steccherinum Ballouii" and it impresses me as being a very
distinct and marked "new species". However, it would »* include*! in Ra.lulum
by any one who

AT LOS AWCE;

JAN 2 0 1942
LIBRARY

BARTLETT, HARLEY H., Massachusetts:

Daedalea confragosa, form — Polyporus carneus, Nees — Panus stipticus —
Lenzites betulina — Lenzites sepiaria — Trametes sepiaria — Daedalea unicolor —
Polyporus adustus — Geaster hygrometricus — Scleroderma Geaster, small form in
sand — Scleroderma Geaster, large, thin form in loam — Scleroderma verrucosum.
The type form only occurs in the sandy soil of our Atlantic Coast. Mr. Bartlett
finds it abundant and noted a disagreeable odor. I think the odor is a decomposi-
tion product. While occasionally specimens occur that are caespitose and more or
less confluent and deformed, each pileus has its own distinct stem and it should
be classified with the simple stem section. As previously stated the Rostkovius'
figure from which Fries got his idea is abnormal.

BEARDSLEE, H. C., North Carolina:

Fomes pinicola — Fomes fomentarius — Fomes rimostis — Fomes connatus
(on hickory) — Fomes connatus (on dog wood) — Fomes pomaceus (on plum) —
Polyporus caesius — Polyporus adustus — Polyporus adustus, an unusual form with
the pileus also "adustus" — Polyporus gilvus, tending toward licnoides — Polypo-
rus rutilans — Polyporus cinnabarinus — Polystictus velutinus — Polyporus hirsutus—
Fomes leucophaeus — Fomes annosus — Fomes igniarius?, resupinate — Polyporus,
unknown to me, on pine. — Polyporus Schweinitzii.

Collected in Ohio: Polystictus cinnamomeus — Daedalea confragosa — Dae-
dalea ambigua.

Collected in Michigan: Fomes fomentarius, on beech — Trametes sepiaria.

Collected in Illinois: Fomes Everhartii, on oak.

Collected in Maine: Polystictus perennis — Polyporus caeruliporus, a rare
plant. — Daedalea unicolor (fauve form) — Polyporus radiaius, on alder — Thele-
phora palmata var. Americana.

BLACKFORD, Mrs. E. B., Massachusetts:

Polyporus griseus. A fine, abundant collection. In previous years I have
confused this species with leucomelas of Europe, which is quite close, but I think
distinct. It has developed that Polyporus griseus is the same as Polyporus sub-
squamosus in the sense of Fries. The name subquamosus is not a good name for
the plant, and in addition is attributed to Linnaeus. It is not known what Lin-
naeus' plant was and it is very doubtful if this was the plant, hence we shall use
Professor Peck's name which is a very suitable one. — Irpex pachylon — Polyporus
confluens, a rather rare and scantily known species in the United States. I have
collected it frequently in Sweden, but this is the only collection I have from the
United States. I have seen American specimens in European museums labeled
Polyporus ovinus. — Daedalea guercina — Polyporus hispidus. Rare in the United
States, common in Europe. — Hydnum velutinum — Hydnumaurantiacum — Daedalea
confragosa, unusual form — Polyporus rutilans — Fomes carneus — Fomes connatus —
Lenzites saepiaria — Polyporus rutilans — Polyporus squamosus — Hydnum adustum
— Lycoperdon gemmatum — Thelephora terrestris — Trametes suaveolens — Merulius
lachrymans, sterile, mycelial pad. — Polyporus radiatus — Thelephora (cfr. caryo-
phyllea — Hydnum (sp. ) — Hydnum adustum (young) — Lycoperdon atropurpureum
— Fomes carneus — Lenzites saepiaria — Polystictus hirsutus — Polyporus squamosus,
taking almost an agaricoid form. I do not think I have ever seen one before
where the transition to an agaric is so strongly marked. — Genus unknown to me.

BRENCKLE, Dr. J. F., North Dakota:

Gyrophragmium, an unnamed species. — Polyporus cyptopus, the second
collection known to me. — Irpex lacteus, P'r. — Geaster asper — Secotium acumina-
tum — Catastoma circumscissum — Geaster floriformis, also a number of other
species of miscroscopic fungi, not in my line of study.

2

BURN 1 1 AM, STKWART A., New York:

I'olystictus plain.-,, an extremely rare plant. This is the second colK-ction
only that I have recvive i. Daedalea oonfragotttt, tranu-toid form- Polyp,, ru> rut
ilanv- Boletinus pjrosas— Tra.iu-tcs hispi.U -Polyporus gilvu.
form nigricans.

COOK, MEL T., Delaware:

Polystictus hirsutus— Bovistella Ohiensis— Hypoxylon — Irpex tulipifera
— Stereum coraplicattiiu — Polystictus pergamenus — Poly. st ictus ciii.uluriims
Merulius incarnatus — Lycoperdon piriforme — Stereum fudatnm Foiiies ],-iu..
phaeus.

DAVIS, vSIMON, Massachusetts:

Daedalea confragosa— Hydnum ochraceum — Leotia lubrica— Leotia lubrica
yar. Stevensonii— Peziza — Hydnum imbiicatum — Favolus euro|jaeiis Pohporus
elegans— Cordyceps militaris. Mr. Davis finds this abundantlx . It rarely reaches
me. — Polyporus Curtisii. This plant is of a southern type Polyponis cai
Reticularia Lycoperdon— Daedalea confragosa— Geoglossum luteiim Pol
cinnabarinus — Polyporus albellus — Lenzites saepiaria Pohporus brumale
Polystictus pubescens— Myxomycetes— Polyporus a.hnirabilis. well named. It i-
rare, but Mr. Davis finds it on old apple trees.

DEARNESS, JOHN, Canada:

Polyporus caerulaeporus. a rare plant— Polyporus spumeus— Polyporu-

albellus — Polypcrus versicutis? I think Professor In-aiiK>s i> tlu- onlv <,iu- wlm
finds this plant, and it is not certain that it is the same as the original which u.i-
from Cuba. — Polystictus biformis— Polyporus (two species I — Polystictus circinatus.
Fries— Polystictus circinatus, form with thin context and lateral stipe Poly stiitus
perennis — Cantharellus floccosus — Polystictus Montagnei — Hydnum auriscalpiuiu
— Hydnum suaveolens — Hydnum (two species).

EDGERTON, C. W., Louisiana:

Arachnion album, Schw. — Stereum spadiceun, Fr. — Favolus Brasilieii-is.
Fr. — Polystictus membranaceus? While the pores are white, I am more inclined l<>
refer it toa pale form of pergamenus. Two species of Corticuun. l:«»mes torrulo-
susPersoon. A frequent plant around Paris but this is the first time it is known
from America. Persoon knew it well and named it. Mr. Kdgerton collected it mi
the trunk of a living Live Oak in Audubon Park at New Orleans.

FISHER, G. C., Florida:

Bovista plumbea, Persoon — Hirneola auricula-judae Polyponis arcu-
larius — Cyathus vernicosus — Cyathus stercoreus — Xylaria ('.easier .mmil.it
us — Tylostoma campestre — Tylostoma albicans, but with a darker stipe T\
lostoma tuberculatum —Tylostoma Longii —Tylostoma (sp. ) Tranu t
— Trametes obtusus — Rhizopogon (two species) Hydnangium Hydnum erina-
ceiim — Polyporus carneus — Sclerodenna Cepa. Hydnum ( sp.).

FISCHER, O. E., Michigan:

Polystictus conchifer— Fomes con natus— Polystictus perganu-nus I'<,1>
porus rufescens, rare in the United States. — Polyporus adustus. larger pores than
usual, tending toward crispus. .

FOWLER, JAMES, Canada:

The dried agarics are listed as determined by Mr. Fowler RUSSH
-Clitopilus prunulus— Boletus retipes— Flammula polychroa L.utarius viK-mis
Pholiota squarrosa— Russula adusta— Pleurotus ostreatus Russtila t-n
sula virescens —Boletus Americanus- Hypholoma sul.lateritia CUtO^rbt orell.t

— Hypholoma lacrymabunda — Amanita phalloides — Amanita muscaria — Russula
purpurina — Entoloma strictins— Russula nigricans — Omphalia epichysium — L/act-
arius resinus — L/actarius piperatus — Russula fragilis — Hygrophorus hypothejus —
Mycena epipterygia — Mycena eyanothrix — Mycena vulgaris — Omphalia campanella
--Russula alutacea — Polyporus borealis -Polyporus sulphureus — L/ycoperdon gem-
matum — L/ycoperdon umbrinum — Panus stipticus.

CARMAN, H., Kentucky:

Sclerotium of some unknown species. Found in a garden.

GARRETT, A. O., Utah:

Polystictus versicolor, a beautifully marked variety.

GRIFFIN, D. B., Vermont:

Polystictus cinnabarinus — Deadalea confragosa, lenzitoid form — Polyporus
betulinus, a most curious, abnormal form. It is young and has developed no pores,
and one not perfectly familiar with the normal form would never suspect its re-
lationship even.

HADL/EY, Mrs. A. M. .Vermont:

Polyporus sulphureus. The largest specimen of this species I have ever
seen. When dried it was about a foot wide and eighteen inches long. When fresh
it doubtless exceeded these dimensions considerably.
HAL/L/, J. G., North Carolina:

L/enzites betulina — Polystictus versicolor — Polystictus sanguineus — Stere-
um hirsutum — Stereum sericeum, Schw. — Polystictus hirsutus — Irpex tulipifera
Hymenochaete — Schizophyllum vulgare — Stereum fasciatum, Schw.

HASSLER, F. A., Colorado:

Scleroderma Cepa.
HEALD, F. D., Texas:

Mycenastrum Corium
HEDGCOCK, GEO. G., Washington,' D. C.

Polyporus amarus. From California. Co-type material.

HILL/, OSCAR, Massachusetts:

Polystictus versicolor — Polyporus, unknown to me. — L/enzites betulina
var. flaccida, teste Bresadola.

HOWEIvL,, GEORGE T., Indiana:

Hydnum adustum, Schw. — Daedalea confragosa, thin form. — Polystictus
pergamenus — Daedal eaambigua. Berk. — L/enzites betulina — Daedalea confragosa,
trametoid form — Polystictus pergamenus — Stereum. Entirely unknown, to me
and very marked. It is close to Stereum cinerescens, but quite different with
strongly developed pileus and imbedded cystidia.

I suppose it belong to the "genus" L/loydiella (sic). — Polyporus adustus — Poly-
porus salignus — Trametes hispida.

JONES, MISS KATE A., New Hampshire:

Panus stipticus — Polystictus versicolor — L/enzites betulina — Polyporus
carneus — Polystictus pergamenus — Polystictus hirsutus. — Polystictus velutinus
— Stereum fasciatum — Fomes leucophaeus — Polyporus carneus — Panus stipticus —
Polystictus cinnabarinus — Daedalea unicolor — L/enzites saepiaria.

KIL/L/GORE, ANTHONY, New Jersey:

Polyporus sulphureus.
KREKE, REV. MARCUS, Ohio:

Stereum fasciatum, an unusual form of this common species.

4

LAKIN, W. T., Maryland;

Lenzites protracta, Fr. (See note 1 )— Guepinia spathulata — Polystictus
hirsutus — Fomes leucophaeus — Myxomycetes — Polyporus cristatus (Note 2 ) —
Daedal ea quercina— Stereum fasciatum (Note 3)— Hydnum pulcherrimum— Daeda-
lea unicolor ( Polyporoid form ) — Daedalea con fragosa— Polyporus dichrous
stictus versicolor, pale form— Ustulina vulgaris (conidial form ) —Fomes rimos-
us— Morchella esculenta (form conica) — Polyporus adustus.

LANGTON, THOMAS, Canada:

Polyporus Schweinitzii— Stereum (sp. ) T*his belongs to the same genus
as Stereum frustulosum. They have a new name for this "genus" now in Europe,
but I do not recall what it is. The "new genus" is based on the plant's peculiar
cystidia. — Polyporus sulphureus. This specimen is distinctly stalked, which is
unusual for this species. — Polystictus cinnamomeus — Phlebia(?) Species unknown
to me.— Lenzites saepiaria— Hypoxylon coccineum— Pezizn (Vurpinia spathulata
— Calocera cornea — Lycogala Epidendrum — Xylaria (conidial) — Hymenochaete—
Polyporus Schweinitzii— Polyporus, unknown to me. It is close to pubescens.
Spores 2 >£ x 8 hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, curved.— Polyporus adustus resupin-
ate — Polyporus fumosus. I think this is the true fumosus as illustrated beauti-
fully by Klotzsch. Spores are 4x8 but many are smaller, about 2% x6. — Panus
rudis — Polyporus brumale — Trametes saepiaria — Tremella foliacea— Hydnum a-
dustum — Peniophora — Stereum spadiceum — Phlebia (sp. ) — Fuligo varians — Poria
(sp.).

LEARN, CLARENCE D., Iowa:

Fomes igniarius (on butternut) — Fomes leucophaeus — Fomes Ever -
hartii— Fomes pomaceus— Polyporus carneus.

LEHMAN, E. A., North Carolina:

Daedalea confragosa — Geaster velutinus — Polystictus focicola — Mitn-my-
ces cinnabarinus — Mitremyces lutescens— Xylaria (sp.)— Hydnum (sp.) Hydnum
adustum — Polystictus sanguineus — Polystictus cinnabarinus— Polyporus Curtisii.

LORDLEY, E- D., Nova Scotia:
Clavaria (sp. ) Grew in Sphagnum.

MEDCAIvF, B. G., Minnesota:
Polyporus arcularius.

MIGNAUI/T, REV. JOS. B., Canada:

Deadalea unicolor— Polyporus elegans —Polystictus pen-nnis.
specimens is marked with black zones, unusual in this species.— Polystictus ver-
sicolor— Polystictus cinnabarinus— Deadalea confragosa— Panus (?)— 1
caryophyllum— Lenzites saepiaria — Polyporus adustus — Polyporus Schweinitzii,
Fr. — Polystictus versicolor.

MORRIS, GEO. E., Massachusetts:

Polyporus sulphureus— Polyporus lucidus— Polyporus can
unicolor— Polyporus cuticularis, Bull.— Daedalea confragosa, trameto
Polyporus brumale— Hydnum adustum— Polyporus dichrous,- <
us, rare— Polystictus conchifer— Polystictus perennis— Polyporus n
crispa — Polyporus picipes, depauperate form. —Polyporus hispidus, rare -Poly
porus elegans —Fomes leucophaeus, -Daedalea confragosa -
aria — Polystictus hirsutus —Trametes suaveolens - Thelephora tei
coperdon umbrinum -Trametes pini, the thin form called Trametes able
Karsten and T. piceinus by Peck (cfr. Myc. Notes p. 31

' potyusI adustus - Polyporus gilvus -Polyporus renifonnis -Schbo-
phyllum commune -Granularia - Lenzites saepiaria -Polysti.

— Polyporas lucidus — Daedalea unicolor — Cyathas striatus — Polystictus versi-
color — Polystictus hirsutulus — Fomes pomaceus — Thelephora Schweiniuii
Polyporus adustus — Polyporus noiulosus — Polyporus betulintis — Xylaria corni-
formis — Panus stipticits — Irpax — Peziza occiclentalis — L»entinus lepideiis — Ly-
coperdon Turaerii.

NOBI/E, MRS. M. A., Florida:

Trametes hydnoides — Otidea ( sp. )
PERClVAlv, MRS, M. S.T Tennessee:

Panus mdis — Mitremyees lutescens — I/ichen — Polystictus versicolor
Polyporus lucidus — Stereum fasciatum - -Urnula Craterium — lyenzites betulina—
Fomes leuc<Sphaeus — Polystictus hirsutus — Polystictus pergamenus — Hydnum
Erinaceum — Mitreiryces lutescens. Beautiful specimen of a species I am always,
glad to receive. — Phallus Ravenelii.

RIDDLE L. W., Massachusetts:

Polyporus (cfr. spumeus) Spores ovate-subglobose, 4 — 5, hyaline, smooth.
guttulate, abundant. Grew on an apple tree. I have not my European material of
spumeus at hand for comparison but it is surely very close, and has the same pe-
culiar guttulate spores, though these are smaller than those of the European plant
as I remember it . — Fomes officinalis, rare in the United States. — Polyporus sul-
phureus — Polyporus elegans? A single half specimen. It is sessile, hence not the
usual Polyporus elegans with a black stem. I suspect however it is au abnormal
specimen with the stipe undeveloped for some reason. — Polyporus(sp. ) — Polystic-
tus membranaceus. This is a common species in the tropics, but it is very rare in
temperate regions. This is the second collection I have gotten from the United States.

— Polyporus leprodes in the sense of Fries, but I doubt if the same as Rostkovius"
figure, on which Fries based the name. In reality it is only a sessile, multiplex
form of Polyporus varius as Fries states. I have collected it several times on the
trees in the park at Upsala.but these I think are the first specimens I have ever
seen from the United States.

ROGERS, E. O. ,Iowa:

Polyporus adustus — Polyporus (sp,) —Polyporus gilvus, imperfectly de-
veloped — Polystictus versicolor — Polyporus gilvus, normal.
STOCKBERGER, W. W., Washington, D. C.

Stereum ochraceoflavum. Collected in Florida.
STORER, MISS E. D., Pennsylvania:

Polyporus ( sp. ) — Polystictus versicolor.
STREETER, MRS. HANNAH, Pennsylvania:

T^enzites saepiaria — Rhizina inflata — Hydnum adustum — Irpex cinna-
momeus — Daeclalea unicolor — Polyporus adustus — Polyporus gilvus — Irpex tu -
lipifera — Polyporus hispidus — Polystictus versicolor — Steieum fasciatum — Stere-
um bicolor — Favolus europaeus — Urnula Craterium — Hydnum suaveolens — L,enz-
ites corrugata — Daedalea confragosa, thin form — Daedalea confragosa ,trametoid
form — Daedalea juniperina — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Daldinea concentrica—
Xylaria — Polyporus pocula — Polyporus dichrous — Polyporus griseus • — ' 'Thele-
phora dendritica" cfr. letter No. 16, p. 8 — Pyrenomycetes — Stereum rubigino-
sum — Thelephora Schweinitzii — Polyporus retipes. The occurence of this spec-
ies is of much interest. Heretofore it was only known from the original collection in
Alabama. — Bulgaria rufa — Bulgaria inquinans — Thelephora vialis — Panus rudis.
From tropical America, probably: Polystictus trichomallus.
SUTIJFF, MISS, California:
Polystictus perennis — Daldinea concentrica.
6

WALKER, MISS I. M., Ontario:

Polyporus picipes — Xylaria (conidial) — Polystictus perennis —Thelephora
(sp.) — Thelephora terrestris -Thelephora (sp.) — Favolus c-uroput-us — poKstu-t-
us versicolor — Polypoms elegans — Pamts rudis —Polyporus adu-lus
conchatus— Daedalea confragosa — Cyathus striatus — Physalacria inflata (rare-
ly received by me) — Fomes leucophaeus.

WHETSTONE, Dr. M. S., Minnesota:

Hydnum adustum — Polystictus versicolor — Pezira ( three specie* ) —
Peziza occidental —Thelephora Schwi-init/ii - Polyporus cnxvu>( N
in this country.— Mycelial layer. A thin, soft papyraceous im-iiihraiu-, growing
between layers of rotten wood. It has very much the appearance of a pi.-ci- <>i chamois
skin. It is known to be the mycelial membrane of some fungus, probably a Poria
or Polyporus. I would ba glad to trace its connection to the fruiting plant.
I saria (? ) — Polystictus velutinus (?) — Daldinea concentrica — I Y/i/a ( sp. ) -Poly-
stictus biformis — Pauus stipticus — Polyporus adustus — Polystictus pi-rgaim-niis
Lenzites betulina — Xylaria polpmorpha— Stereum spadkvum (Vt-nus unkown
to me. —Polyporus gilvus — Helvella ( sp. ) — Hydnum (sp. ) — Gall — Polyp »rus
elegans — Xylaria — Clavaria pistillaria — Polyporus Spraguei — Leotia lubrica
Geaster saccatus — Genus unknown to me Curious thing with long chain-like
spores. — Fomes leucophaeus.

NOTE 1. Lenzites (or Trametes ) protract. - 1 have always been in doubt i\»> -ut wb.it
name to use for this plant which is frequent with us in An-erica. First, I called it Ix-iuitvs \iah«,
as Peck discovered it to be a "new species" and so named it. Hut it developed ttwtt it grew in Kun.jM-
though it is rare there, and Bresadola referred it to Trametes tnitiea of IVrsooii. I Bhv«\«s thought
it was not Trametes trahea as described by Persoon, »s it seems fro me tliere HIV strong dMcrep-
ancies between this plant and the description. But Bresadola published that he had -tud.«-.l IVr
soon's herbarium, and I supposed that his conclusions were based on a specimen. Tin-re i- D
men in I'ersoon's herbarium. Hence, I can not longer use the name trabea. believing thi\t it i« nut
the plant Persoon had in hand. The only thing that I feel sure about is that it is the plant ilhMr.it. -.1
in Fries' Icones, t. 191 as Trametes protracta, and in future 1 shall use that imme basin* it on
tins figure. There is a bar to the use of Trametes protmcra according to nomenclatorial ( profeaaed)
priorists, as it is not the original of that name. It was at first applied to a tropical plant vlm-li thfii
had a well established name and the same name it now has. There is therefore no use to drag thu
plant into the muss nnd give the details.

NOTE 2. Polyporus cristatus.- I am now thoroughly -convinced from comparison «f HUM
pean and American material that the plant we have so long known in this country ;w Poly porn*
flavovirens is the same as Polyporus cristatus of Europe. I have suspected thia for some time, but
the European species is rare, and I did not like to make the statement -mill I had *a! -i >.l inv-. ;f
on the subject. At Kew.Paris and Upsala are very fragmentary specimens only, but at Ih-rlm I i<
a nice collection that had been mode by Dr. He linings. I also recently rvcencil a x>**l <-..ll<-< titui
from one or two of my European correspondents, and on comparison with tlie AIIHTIIMM pl.mt I
am sure they are the same. I think there is a misapprehension among European myrolnKi.«t* <i*
the general nature of this plant. Their ideas were obtained from EUwtkoriut' pwtur.- wh
cites as being "good". It is good as to color, but as to form it is abnormally d«-vel..p«-d into a
multiplex pileus. The normal pileus is simple, in fact, I think the plant dcx-s not belong in the
section Merisma where Fries placed it, but should *o in the section Ovinus, with a simple «

NOTE 3. Stereum fasciatum.- In future we shall so name specimens that reach i»,
Schweinitz's name for the plant which is better known in American mycolcw a- Sh-n-uiii
color, that being the name always used by our own mycolottiste, particularly Be
Morgan. Stereum versicolor is a tropical species that came originally from Ja
ed up the type specimens at the British Museum, and I think it is not our Ain.-n. .

NOTE 4 Polyporus croceus.- I am now convinced after comparison of UK- ai
specimens from Europe with the American that the plant known in this country as IV
otae as named by Schweinitz and Polyporus hypococcinus as named by Berkeley
the European plant. It is extremely rare both in Europe and in America nnd ttoM «
may consider thenisi-hos fortunate. I have only collected it twice in Am.
Kurop,-. When fresh it is of a beautiful uniform yellow, called by Per»oon croceu^and tt
ican plant assumes more orange forms as I n-iiu-mlH-r them. There has II.-N. r i»-,-i. :i
lustration made of it, although when fresh and in its prime it is the moststnkmg IN.Iyi-.ni
grows. It discolors in drying, turning dark, and the pores turn darker than the co,
had a suspicion that our American plant would prove to be the same aa the Europeai
only recently satisfied myself on this point.

7

A, U

LETTER No. 30.

List of specimens received from the United States, Canada, and foreign
countries since the last report.

-My thanks are extended to the senders.

January, 1911. (, G U,OYI)

ABBOTT, DR. E. K., California:

Polystictus circinatus, western form. This does not hav<- tin- dual
context strongly marked. It has, however; same context and IMTHIJ.,
tidia. It is perhaps more close to what is now called triqu.-t.-r in Hump.-.
Helvella Californica— Helvella (Sp.)— Polystictus perennis— tw,
Peziza — Stereum, Section "Lloydella"— Ganoderma leucopluu-us (eta
Australis)— Thelephora caryophyllea.

AIKEN, WALTER H., Ohio:

Stereum frustulosum — Stereum complicatum — Steivum purpummi
Stereum albobadium — Corticium laeva (?) — Peniophora vellen'tim <?i I'.-ni
ophora incarnata — Arcyria. Also, determined by himself — Physann.
reum — Didymium minus— Cratereum leucocephalum.

ALLEN, MISS LIZZIE C., Massachusetts:

Polyporus carneus — Stereum diaphanum, a rare plant Favolus t-uro
paeus — Lycoperdon piriforme — Clavaria (sp.) — Peziza aeruginosa — Polyporus
Spraguei (?) — Polystictus perennis — Polystictus hirsutulus.

ALLEN, W. B., England:

Polyporus, close to Boucheanus. For me it is a form of st|u:iiin»iis
with exactly same pileate pore characters, etc., but mesopodal. unmlor.-d
stem. — Lycoperdon pusillum with a strong cortex developnu-iii Ly«>p.-i<l<»it
umbrinum ( ?)— Calvatia, sterile base (probably of C. sacra turn* CaUatia
(cfr. caelata) smooth form — Mycenastruni C'orium— Lycop«M-«l«ui i-.-pji«-f«>rin«'
— Geaster floriformis— Bovistella (cfr. Dominicensis).

A.MES, FRANK H., New York:

Stereum, unknown to me— Polyporus albellu.- l'ol>*ii« ni> . iniui-
inomeus— Poria tulipifera— Lenzites betulina— Polystictus C.rayii !'<,!> si i<
tus versicolor — Hypoxylon — Fomes connatus— Irjiex cinnamomeus— "Xylaria
flabelliformis," conidial— Polyporus salignus, spores gloibose, 4-4J hyal.i,.-.
smooth— Geaster hygrometricus— Polyporus adustus— Polyporus gihus
Polyporus brumalis-Trametes confragosa— Stereum rubiginosuni St,.,-,.,im
f:isciatum— Fomes rimosus.

1 /ORNIA

AX LO^ I

JAN 2 01942

BAKER, C. H., Florida:

Mycena pura (?) — Cyathus stercoreus — Insect gall.

BALL, CARLETON R., Texas:

Calvatia lilacina — Lepiota Morganii. "The common Hymenomycete
of the fairy rings of the higher plains." — Lycoperdon cruciatum.

BALLOU, W. H., New York:

"Thelephora dendritica" — Lenzites saepiaria— four species of Poria
and two Thelephoraceae unknown to me.

BARBIER, M., France:
Trametes Butignotii.

BARKER, W. E., New Zealand:
Crucibulum vulgare.

BEARDSLEE, H. C., North Carolina:

Fomes Eberhartii. Quite common on oak, teste Bresadola.

BERTOLET, A. S., Canada:

Polyporus Peckii.

From North Carolina, Polyporus obtusus, fine specimen.

From Tennessee, Cordyceps militaris — Polyporus umbellatus— Poly-
porus croceus — Polyporus Berkeley! — Polyporus albellus — Tremellodon gelat-
inosum.

BEZZI, DR. M., Italy:

Polyporus adustus, thin form — Scleroderma tenerum — Scleroderma
Cepa — Panus stipticus.

BLACKFORD, MRS. E. B., Massachusetts:

Merulius tremellosus, effete. I did not recognize when received.
Since learned it in the woods in this condition. — Polystictus cuticularis, (Pol.
Issue p. 12, fig. 205). The second collection that has reached me, and I am
glad to have the species thus confirmed. It must not be confused with the
common Polyporus cuticularis — Polyporus carneus — Polyporus adustus —
Polyporus salignus — Daedalea confragosa, form corrugata — Polyporus radi-
atus — Polystictus hirsutus — Polystictus perennis — Hydnum aurantiacum —
Polystictus abietinus — Hydnum suaveolens — Calvatia elata— Polystictus circi-
natus — Three species of Hydnum — Polyporus spumeus. This is a much thin-
ner plant than I am familiar with in Europe, but with the same context, sur-
face, and peculiar spores I do not question it is the American form.

BONNET, E., France:

Fomes fomentarius, applanate specimen.

BRAENDLE, F. J., District of Columbia:
Hydnum adustum.

2

BRESADOLA, REV. G., Austria:

My best thanks are extended to Rev. Bresadola for this interesting
collection of historic material. They will be very valuable for study and ref-
erence. Poria fulvescens, co-type— Polyporus Mariani, co-type— Poria con-
fusa, co-type— Trametes subsinuosa, co-type— Trametes flavescens, co-type—
Poria nigrescens, co-type— Polyporus valesiacus, co-type. This is the same
as Murrill has called a "new species," Polyporus tsugae, and both are in my
opinion too close to Polyporus lucidus — Polystictus microloma. This is same
as carneo-niger, of my recent pamphlet (Microporus)— Trametes Rhlzo-
phorae.

BROWN, CHAS. H., Wisconsin:

Polyporus guttulatus (?)— Polyporus albellus— Merulius tremellosua
— Trametes hispida — Polystictus velutinus, true in my opinion. Generally
a misunderstood species.

BURNHAM, S. H., New York:

Polyporus, unknown to me. Except as to spores it answers to occl-
dentalis of Murrill. Context and surface as in Polyporus obtusus. Pores
small. Spores sub globose, 6-7, hyaline, smooth with a large guttae. It grew
on fallen elm. — Polyporus albiceps. The indications of black on the stem
show that this should be classed in the section with varius — Polyporus mel-
anopus. It was sent as radicatus but differs in its habits (caespitose) and
spores (4 x 8) much smaller. As to spores and habits it belongs to the sec-
tion with picipes and varius, but surface is not the same. In general appear-
ance (except habits) this collection resembles radicatus — Polyporus admira-
bilis. Sent as Underwoodii, which in my opinion is a synonym. — Polyporus
pubescens var. Grayii.

BUTIGNOTI, DR., Switzerland:

Trametes Butignoti (co-type species)— Geaster minimus— Polyporus
benzoinus — Trametes odorata — Polyporus hirtus, an extremely rare plant In
Europe, and this is the first specimen I have received, though I have seen It
in the museums. It is characterized by its large, fusiform spores, unusual
in the Polyporei. It is the same or very close to what is called in America
Polyporus hispidulus.

CHEESEMAN, W. N., Canada:

Polyporus albiceps. I think this is albiceps, although the blackish
stripe would not so indicate. It seems otherwise the same. I do not make
out the spores.

CLARKE, J. F., Iowa:

Clitocybe abortivus (?) (Abortive forms).

COMPTON, JOS. S:, Illinois:

Polyporus dichrous— Lycogala epidendrum.

COONS, G. H., Nebraska:
Secotium acuminatum.

COTTON, A. D., England:
Polyporus benzoinus.

CROSSLAND, CHAS., England:

Polyporus albidus, in sense of Bresadola.

DALLAS, MRS. GEO. M., Pennsylvania:

Polyporus Whitei, Murrill, according to description. It is a variety
of cristatus (or flavovirens).

DAVIS, SIMON, Massachusetts:

Polyporus albellus — Hydnum albidum Pk., white when fresh. — Fomes
connatus— Polyporus rutilans, thin form. — Polyporus carneus— Polystictus
versicolor — Polyporus (sp.) smell of almond! — Polyporus spumeus, thin Amer-
ican form — Polyporus rutilans — Lycoperdon piriforme — Polyporus admira-
bilis, on apple. Fine specimen of a rare species.

DEARNESS, JOHN, Canada:

Polyporus gilvus— Polyporus tephroleucus— Polyporus albellus —
Polyporus cristatus — Boletinus palustris — Boletus Clintoniantis — Polyporus
adustus.

DEMETRIO, C. H., Missouri:

Stereum fasciatum — Irpex cinnamomeus — Daedalea unicolor— Poly-
porus lucidus — Polyporus albo-luteus. On Abies Engelmanni in mountain
regions of Colorado. A peculiar, western plant, only one collection known
east of the Mississippi River. It is badly misnamed. Cfr. Myc. Notes, p. 411.

DOBBIN, FRANK, New York:

Polyporus betulinus— Polyporus carneus — Fomes pinicola.

DUPAIN, V., France:

Daedalea biennis— Daedalea quercina — Fomes pomaceus— Fomes to-
rulosus — Polystictus versicolor (pale form). — Daedalea confragosa — Trametes
hispida.

DUPRET, H., Canada:

Polystictus cinnabarinus — Poria tulipifera.

EDWARDS, S. C., North Carolina:

Polyporus Schweinitzii — Irpex tabacinus. I judge from the descrip-
tion. It is the first time I have received it. — Insect Gall on southern cypress.
This figures as a "fungus" in our "literature," and is included in Saccardo.
The "type" is in Schweinitz's herbarium.— Stereum fasciatum — Stereum bi-
color — Ganoderma sessile— Polystictus sanguineus — Polystictus sanguineus,
faded specimen. — Polyporus gilvus — Polyporus albidus— Fomes annosus —
Polystictus villosus — Polyporus, unknown to me but of much interest. I
think I have seen it in Europe somewhere, but I can not recall what it is. —
Polystictus azureus— Hydnum ochraceum — Stereum complicatum — Polyporus

4

adustus— Polystictus elongatus— Polystictus ectypus. Thn-.- coll.-< -tinns gent
by Mr. Edwards show gradations into Polystic-tus Crayii of mon- north. -in
localities. — Lenzites betulina— Trametes.

EYRE, W. L. W., England:

Poria Eyrei, Bres. .Mss., co-type.

FAIRMAN, C. E., New York:

Polyporus resinosus — Geaster saccatus— Polyporus adustu- !•
lea confragosa — Polystictus hirsutus— Boletinus porosus— Polystic tn-
color.

FAWCETT, H. S., Florida:

Cl^dosporuni citri, (cfr. Mycologia, 1910, p. 24.".).

FINK, DR. BRUCE, Ohio:
Diderma testaceum.

FISHER, G. C., New York:

Hydnum albidum, probably from its small size.

-From Florida, Tylostoma subfuscum— Tylostoma (sp.» — Lycop.-nlon
cruciatum — Lycoperdon cruciatum (peculiar cortex)— Geaster miniums
Geaster minimus (pigmy form) — Bovistella floridensis. Professor Fisher is the
only one that finds this species, which is strongly distinct.— Scleroderma (?)
(Genus (?), too young). — Arachnion album. This characteristic genius rar. ly
reaches me. — Polyporus gilvus, thin form tending toward licnoides— Daldinia
concentrica— Bovistella Ohiensis— Calvatia lilacina— Polyporus (Ganodcnuai
related to lucidus — Polyporus (Ganoderma) Curtisii. The palest collection I
ever saw. Some specimens ulviost trliitr. Usually it is more yellowish.

FITZGERALD, MISS MARY, North Carolina:

* Xylaria tentaculata, I think, from the description. It is very r:ii«\
and did not fall into Ellis', hands. The spores are 8 x 20-24 and inequilateral.
The "tentacular processes" are quite curious and unknown to me on any
other species, but I know very little about Xylarias.— Cordyceps herculea as
known in American mycology, but not of Schweinitz, I think.— Thelephora.
Seems close to Thelephora palmata, but thicker and more recumbent. It is
unknown to me.— Butterflies with pollen masses of Asclepias attached to the
eyes. I supposed they were Cordyceps or some similar genus, until I sent
them to Professor Thaxter, who kindly informed me their nature,
scab on apple twigs — Genus unknown to me. It is black and branches at the
top. It has conidial spores, and has been referred as a conidial form of a
Pyrenomycete by those to whom I have sent it, but no one has suggested
any genus of Pyrenomycetes that takes this shape.— I^entinus ursinus -
crofungus — Craterellus, doubtful, probably abnormal.

FRIES, ROBERT E., Sweden:

Lycoperdon polymorphum— Bovistella echinella, collected at I
leby, Sweden. The third collection made in Europe of this rare, little spec

5

FROGGATT, W. W., Australia:

Bovistella aspera — Scleroderma Cepa — Bovistella australiensis (?)
This has gleba of a different color than that I have seen before, but otherwise
the characters seem much the same. — Bovistella scabra.

GARRETT, A. O., Utah:
Secotium acuminatum.

GOSSWEILER, JOHN, Africa:

Geaster saccatus — Three Phalloids, dried which without color notes
are uncertain. — Clathrus camerunensis (probably) — Phallus (sp.) — Lysurus
(sp.).

GRELET, L. J., France:

Scleroderma aurantiacum — Scleroderma Cepa — Daedalea biennis —
Cyathus striatus.

GRIFFIN, D. B., Vermont:

Lycoperdon gemmatum — Lycoperdon form — Lycoperdon piriforme —
Lycoperdon umbrinum — Geaster triplex — Geaster saccatus — Daldinia concen-
trica — Xylaria polymorpha — Hydnum — Pleurotus nidulans — Scleroderma au-
rantium — Scleroderma tenerum — Polyporus resinosus — Polyporus elegans —
Polyporus brumalis — Polyporus radiatus — Polyporus picipes ( ?) Differs from
the usual form in its pale colored pileus. — Stereum frustulosum— Clavaria lig-
ula — Polystistus versicolor — Lycoperdon echinatum (rare). — Polyporus albel-
lus — Lenzites betulina — Daedalea unicolor — Daedalea confragosa — Xylaria
polymorpha, conidial. — Thelephora terrestris — Schizophyllum commune — Ste-
reum sericeum — Ustulina vulgaris — Stemonitis splendens — Thelephora
Schweinitzii — Panus stipticus — Polyporus adustus — Fomes fomentarius — Ir-
pex cinnamomeus, effete. — -Polystictus hirsutus. — Hyphomyces lactifluorum —
Favolus europaeus — Panus rudis — Gyromitra esculenta (?) — Clavaria *stricta
— Polyporus Schweinitzii — Polystictus perennis — Panus torulosus, I think. —
Polyporus, belonging to the mesopodal section Lentus, but species unknown
to me. — Daedalea confragosa (form Trametes Bulliardii). — Paxillus atroto-
mentosus — Craterellus cornucopoides — Hydnum (Sp.) — Clavaria (Sp.) — Poly-
stictus pergamenus — Polyporus rufescens, well developed, "an undistorted,
Polyporus distortus" — Polyporus Peckii — Polyporus melanoporus, as I believe,
but I do not recall receiving it before from United States. I know the species
in Europe. — Polyporus melanoporus, same as preceding but thinner. — Poly-
porus sulphureus — Lenzites saepiaria, discolored. — Spathularia flavida. — Poly-
porus picipes.

GRIFFITHS, DAVID, District of Columbia:

Simblum sphaerocephalum, red when fresh. From Texas.

HADLEY, MRS. A. M., Vermont:

Polyporus lucidus — Polystictus circinatus — Calvatia gigantea.

HRDLICKA, DR. A., Argentina:

Calvatia lilacina, as it grows in every country of the world.— Tyloa-
toma australiana. Seems to agree with my specimen from Australia. — Disco-
mycete unknown to me.

HANMER, C. C., Connecticut:

Scleroderma flavidum (?) — Hydnum septentrionale — Polyporus cuti-
cularis — Polyporus galactinus (?)— Trametes suaveolens— Polyporus Schwel-
nitzii— Polyporus spumeus (?) or close. The abundant spores are apple seed
shape or subglobose, 4x5 hyaline, smooth, guttulate in water. The plant is
also much thinner thai spumeus of Europe.

HARIOT, P., France:

Polystictus lutescens (originally labeled hirsutus), from New Cale-
donia.

HARPER, E. T., Illinois:

Polyporus (cfr. borealis).

HARRISON, CATHARINE, Pennsylvania:
Calvatia lilacina.

HASSLER, DR. F. A., California:
Scleroderma Cepa.

HAWLEY, H. C., England:
Polyporus salignus.

HEMET, L., France:

Lycoperdon piriforme — Rhizopogon rubescens (probably).

HILL, OSCAR, Massachusetts:

Polyporus adustus— Polyporus Spraguei— Polyporus
Polyporus (sp.) — Polyporus albellus, Pk.

HY, F., France:

Geaster minimus (rare in Europe).

JAMES, DAVIS L., Ohio:
Polyporus robiniophilus.

JOLIET HIGH SCHOOL, Illinois:
Polyporus adustus, young.

JONES, MISS KATE A., New Hampshire:

Panus rudis-Daedalea confmgosa-Polystictus cinnabarinus-.
stictus versicolor-Polyporus adustus-Polyporus lucidus

From Vermont, Panus stipticus-Polyponis bnimalis-Lenz
aria-Lenzites betulina-Polystictus pergamenus-
Stereum fasciatum— Daedalea unicolor.

7

KARSTEX, P. A., Finland:

Specimens from Russia. Catastoma defossum — Catastoma Pila.
Smaller but otherwise same as recently named by Robert Fries from South
America. — Catastoma (probably unnamed) between defossum and Pila. — Ly-
coperdon polymorphum — Lycoperdon pusillum.

KAUFMANN, C. M., Michigan:

Fomes pinicola — Fomes Everhartii— Fomes igniarius — Fomes igni-
arius var. nigricans— Stereum radiatum, fine specimen. — Polyporus salignus —
Trametes sepium — Polystictus pergamenus — Daedalea confragosa, abnormal
on Tamarac — Polyporus albellus (?) — Poria pulchella— Poria attenuata—
Polyporus gilvus— Stereum bicolor — Poria subacida— Trametes abietis —
Lenzites protracta — Stereum fasciatum — Polyporus. Unknown to me. It
is closer to robiniophilus than any species I know. — Also several Porias and
Corticiums unknown to me.

KILLGOUR, ARTHUR, New Jersey:

Xylaria polymorpha. The stems of these specimens are l<»i<i. 2-3
inches, not "short or almost none," as stated.

KNOX, WM., Ohio:

Hydnum coralloides.

KRUGER, W., Germany:

Fomes leucophaeus — Polystictus hirsutus (old) — Polystictus versi-
color.

LANGTON, THOS., Canada:

Pleurotus serotinus— Clitopilus abortivus ( ?) — Irpex lacteus — Poly-
porus volvatus — Peziza — Helvella elastica — Polyporus "adriondackensis," as
the plant has been labeled in my collection for some years since it was col-
lected in the Adirondacks, N. Y. I have never found a name for it, and am
sure it is none of Peck's species. — Stereum spadiceum — Phlebia radiata —
Polyporus albellus Pk.— Hydnum adustum — Helvella crispa — Favolus euro-
paeus — Polyporus elegans — Polyporus brumalis — Polyporus varius — Chloro-
splenium versiforme. A much rarer species than aeruginosum. — Daedalea uni-
color — Stereum tabacinum — Genus Dacryopsis (?) Very interesting and
new to me. — Clavaria ligula — Trogia crispa — Irpex lactea — Polyporus benzo-
inus — Helotium confluens — Lenzites protracta (?) It departs from the usual
form. — Gyrocephalus rufus. Rare plant which I am always glad to get. —
Helvella crispa- — Helvella infula — Clitycobe robusta (as named by Mr. Lang-
ton) — "Tremella frondosa," as known in American mycology, and also I think
in the sense of Fries, but not in the original sense as illustrated by Bulliard.
The French plant is different as I know it around Paris. — Coniophora puteana.

LAUGHLIN, MISS EMMA E., Ohio:
Schizophyllum commune.

LEVY, MISS DAISY .!., New York:

Calvatia elata, very young. — Guepinia spathulata — Polyporus (sp.).

LLOYD, J. U., Ohio:
Calvatia rubroflava.

MACKINTOSH, R. B., Massachusetts:

Hydnum mirabilis, in sense of Peck and probably correct. Said to
be also cristatum as named by Bresadola.

MACOUN, JOHN, Canada:
Phallus Ravenelii.

MASSALONGO, PROFESSOR C., Italy:

Lycoperdon atropurpureum— Hydnum (sp.)— Thelephora Tremma
censis, Mss. name— Polystictus versicolor— Lenzites tricolor— Ix»nzlt.
cida.

MILNER, DR. S. G., Michigan:
Pleurotus nidulans.

MORRIS, GEO. E., Massachusetts:

Polyporus albellus — Trametes suaveolens — Polyporus carneus— Poly-
stictus conchifer — Fomes conchatus — Daedalea unicolor ( ?) I take this to be
an aberrant form with white, rigid, subtrametose pores. It surely is unusual.
—Polyporus Schweinitzii— Polyporus radiatus— Daedalea confragosa, thin,
trametoid form. — Polyporus, thin, rigid, white. This is very much my Idea
of what floriformis of Quf-let should be, but I am much in doubt.

NELSON, N. L. T., Iowa:

Polystictus cinnabarinus — Polystictus versicolor— Polystictus hlrsu-
tus — Trametes hispida — Schizophyllum commune — Polyporus gilvus— Favo-
lus europaeus — Plowrightia morbosa — Fomes pomaceus — Daedalea unicolor
— Hirneola auricula-Judae — Polystictus sanguineus, a Northern station—
Panus dealbatus, rarely received by me.— Polyporus adustus— Fomes leuco-
phaeus.

NOBLE, MRS. M. A., Florida:

Lenzites saepiaria (three forms). — Guepinia spathularia, the South-
ern slender form. — Pleurotus nidulans— Polystictus sanguineus— Polystictus,
not recognized by me, but evidently something that has bleached out.- Poly
stictus floridanus — Cyathus Lesueurii— Panus (sp.)— Guepinia spathularia, a
slender, tropical form.

OVERHOLTS, L. O., Ohio:
Hydnum chrysocomum.

PAZSCHKE, DR. O., Germany:

From Germany, Daedalea unicolor— Poria medulla panis— Polyporus
albidus— Polyporus amorphus— Polyporus adustus, resupinate— Fomes robus-
tus — Polystictus zonatus— Polyporus salignus— Polyporus radiatus— Fomes

annosus.

Prom Belgium, Trametes — Polyporus rufescens.

From Finland, col. Karsten, Polyporus amorphus — Polyporus ovinus
— Poria laevigata (?).

From New Guinea, Polystictus occidentalis.

From Portugal, col. Moeller, Fomes, close to conchatus — Fomes ul-
marius — Trametes hispida, Bagl. — Fomes fomentarius, form.

From South Africa. Many of these are from Kalchbrenner's herba-
rium, hence are co-types. Poria (close to contigua), "Fomes rudis" of Kalch.
determination. — Polyporus gilvus (co-type of "isidoides," Kalch.) — Polystic-
tus, cfr. versicolor— Trametes — Polystictus "illotus," co-type — Polystictus cer-
vino-gilvus (= chrysoleucus, Kalch.) — Lenzites repanda — Polyporus sul-
phureus — Polyporus scruposus.

PERCIVAL, MRS. M. S., Tennessee:

Polyporus sulphureus — Mitremyces Ravenelii — Mitremyces cinnaba-
rinus. Mrs. Percival writes me that this is a rare species in her region, much
more rare than our other two American species, lutescens and Ravenelii. In
some localities cinnabarinus is common, and the only species that occurs.

PLITT, CHARLES C., Maryland:

Fomes graveolens. Rarely received by me. — Stereum fasciatum —
Polystictus azureus Fr. which is a dark blue color form of Polystictus versi-
color. It was originally from Mexico but reaches me rarely from United
States. — Polystictus pergamenus.

POOL, R. J., Nebraska:

Polyporus gilvus — Fomes leucophaeus — Daedalea confragosa, ab-
normal.— Fomes pomaceus — Stereum albo-badium — Trametes sepium — Poly-
stictus versicolor (pale form) — Stereum hirsutum — Poria tulipifera — Lenzites
protracta — Polyporus picipes — Polyporus dichrous — Daedalea unicolor — Poly-
stictus velutinus — Daedalea confragosa — Trametes hispida — Polyporus adus-
tus — Merulius corium — Polystictus hirsutus — Poria, setae long, slender. —
Stereum, with slender metuloids. — Stereum cinerescens — Poria — Corticium
(sp.) — Irpex lacteus — Poria sinuosa (?) — -Trametes sepium (?).

RANKIN, W. H., New York:

Trametes abietis — Polyporus rutilans, more rugulose than usual. —
Peniophora cinerea— Polyporus chioneus — Poria — Fomes (cfr. laevigata) —
Polyporus squamosus. Lapsus-sessite, otherwise same. — Polyporus "resino-
sus" — Polyporus elegans — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Thelephora terrestris —
Daedalea unicolor — Favolus europaeus — Fomes igniarius (form nigricans) —
Fomes pinicola — "Tremella albida" — Poria attenuata, a color form of nitida of
Europe. — Polystictus hirsutus — Ganoderma sessile.

REA, CARLETON, England:

Polyporus croceus not in the English text-books. — Polyporus albidus
in sense of Bresadola. — Polyporus picipes as known in England. A dark
form of varius. — Polyporus dryadeus — Polyporus (Ganoderma) resinaceus
(teste Bresadola).

10

RICK, REV., Brazil:

Twelve species of Polystictus— Ten species of Polyporua— Polyatlc-
tus, with peculiar olive context and belongs close to aratus. The hymenial ele-
ments are white and spores also, I think.— Polystictus lodinus tending toward
tabacinum— Polyporus labeled "Fomes rufitincta."— Two species of Fomea.
Also Fomes which looks like "plebius," as determined at Kew from Brazil
and Cuba, but surely not the type from India.— Polystictus (cfr. membrana-
ceus).— Polyporus valenzuelianus (= sapinus (?) ) (= hemlleucus)—
Polystictus rigida— Polystictus "mutabilis p. p." I take mutabilis In another
sense, but I think this was one of the "types."— Polyporus (salignus. I guess).
— Polyporus. There exists no specimen of "Fomes leprosus Fr." as Rev. Rick
determined this collection.— Polyporus (I think lignosus Klotz. etc.)— Daeda-
lea— Polyporus. The rose color when young, changing to bay. I presume is
the character of this plant. It seems to me to answer to Montague's descrip-
tion of Polyporus phaeoporus of which a little frustule at Kew is all that
exists. It may also have been "Feei," of which no type is known.— Fomea
with white, then adustus context. I have seen it at Kew, but can not find it
now.— Polystictus, labeled Polystictus roseolus Rick (Published (?) )— Poly-
stictus. I have seen it at Kew.

ROBERT, DOCTEUR, France:

Fomes applanatus — Stereum hirsutum — "specimen on Pinus halepen-
sis." Received as "Polyporus conchatus," surely not.

ROLFS, P. H., Florida:

Polyporus gilvus. Form with a dark hymenium. Setae abundant

ROUSSEAU, MADAME, Belgium:

All but one or two as named by Madame Rousseau. Scbizophyllum
commune — Merulius corium — Merulius rufus — Poria sanguinolenta — Poria
callosa — Poria aurantiaca — Poria ferruginosa— Poria vitrea— Polyporus uni-
bellatus. Sclerotium, or rather I think a tuberous rhizome.— Fomea poraa-
ceus — Daedalea unicolor — Polystictus abietinus— Polyporus adustus — Fomea
applanatus — Merulius himantioides (?) Loosely adherent with a white sub-
iculum. Spores abundant, 5 x 10, deeply colored. — Merulius tremellosus— Geaa-
ter Schmidelii— Lenzites saepiaria— Polyporus amorphus— Polystictus hir-
sutus.

SCHUMO, S. L., Pennsylvania:

From Newfoundland, Polyporus albellus.

From New Jersey, Fomes graveolens— Phlebia radiata— Phallus Ra-
venelii.

From North Carolina, Polystictus perennis (?) More obese, more
strongly velutinate and brighter color than the usual form. It comes closer
to perennis, however, than any other of our American speclea. I could eaally
claim it as a "new species."— Crucibulum vulgare— Contdlal Xylaria— 1
stictus cinnabarinus— Thelephora Schweinitzii— Fuligo varlana— Polyporui
gilvus— Lenzites betulina— Polystictus pergamenus— Stereum serlceum—

II

nus rudis — Polyporus sulphureus — Polystictus byssinus. The last-named col-
lected by Silas Schumo in Guatemala and determined by Ellis as Polystictus
occidentalis. It is also P. Crocatus, Fr.

SMITH, G. D., Kentucky:

Polyporus hfspidus, a fine specimen on black oak. — Irpex pachylon.
From Ohio, Polyporus cuticularis — Polyporus velutinus.

SMITH, THEODATE L., New Hampshire:

Hydnum humidum, Banker, according to description. Color orange
then brown, very fragrant when received. — Polyporus circinatus, fine collec-
tion.— Stereum tabacinum — Hydnum vellereum — Hydnum aurantiacum — Hyd-
num (sp.)— Polyporus radiatus — Daedalea confragosa, thin form. Also Hyd-
num ochraceum, from Massachusetts.

STERLING, E. B., New Jersey:

Polyporus albellus — Hydnum mirabile, in sense of Peck — Hydnum
erinaceum — Polyporus Spraguei — Hirneola auriculae-Judae (?) Note. —
This is doubtful. It should be studied in contrast with the usual form. —
Polystictus focicola (?) I so reported these but they differ in the bright
color, and should be compared with cinnamomeus.— Polyporus hispidus. Re-
ceived fresh, the largest specimen I ever saw. It measured 16 x 10 x 3 inches,
and weighed 54 pounds. It is rather a rare plant in the United States.

STOVER, W. G., Ohio:

Polyporus adustus— Polyporus Grayii — Polyporus resinosus — Poly-
porus fraxineus. The annual form and a rare plant in the United States.
This is the third collection known to me. In Europe it is more common and
there usually a Fomes. — Favolus europaeus — Fomes connatus — Polyporus
salignus — Stereum spadiceum — Hydnum auriscalpium. Rare except in pine
woods. These (apparently) did not grow on pine cones, the usual habitat —
Fomes Ohiensis — Two species of Poria — Polyporus gilvus — Polystictus per-
gamenu's, also form with white pores. — Polystictus hirsutus — Stereum fascia-
turn — Polystictus versicolor — Stereum complicatum — Polyporus rufescens.
Fine specimen, rarely so well developed in this country. — Stereum rubigino-
sum — Polyporus frondosus — Poria (?) Probably resupinate adustus.

STREETER, MRS. HANNAH, Pennsylvania:

Polyporus retipes. A fine specimen of a rare plant. Collected at
Laurel Springs, N. J. — Polyporus griseus- — Polyporus retipes. On comparison
I think this is same as the original I have from Alabama. I think Polyporus
retipes has never been collected before except from its original station in
Alabama. The finding of this rare species in Pennsylvania is of much in-
terest.

SUTLIFF, MISS MARY L., California:

Scleroderma. Probably an unnamed species. It differs from our
eastern form not only in its peridium characters, but in having more retic-
ulate spores.

12

TRUE, DR. H. L., Ohio:

Hydnum pulcherrimum.

USSHER, CHAS. B., Straits Settlements:
Microscopic fungus.

VAN BAMBEKE, t)R. CHARLES, Belgium:

Lenzites saepiaria (?) Very pale for saepiaria. It probably is pro-
tracta, (Fr. Icon. t. 191).— Polyporus adustus— Scleroderma Bovista (in sense
of Dr. Van Ba'mbeke).— Polyporus varius— Trametes suaveolens— Polyporus
cuticularia — Polyporus fumosus— Poria viallantii (?)— Irpcx ohliqiius (?).

, MISS ISABEL M., Canada:
Clavaria fusiforme — Spathularia flavida— Geoglossum fmuosum —
Mutinus caninus (fresh).— Daedalea confragosa thin form.— Daedalea uni-
color — Polystictus hirsutus — Polystictus versicolor — Len/it.-- >a«-|>iaria —
Polystictus perennis — Daldinia concentrica — Polyporus carneus — Lycoperdon
cepaeforme — Polyporus brumalis — Thelephora terrestris — Spathularia flavida
— Spathularia velutipes — Cordyceps ophiglossoides — Leotia chlortx-ephala —
Xylaria — Xylaria polymorpha (obese form). — Two species of Clavarla.—
Three species of Peziza.

WARNER, H. E., New Hampshire:
Polyporus albellus.

• \VEIDMANN, ANT., Austria:
Polyporus salignus.

WESTGATE, J. M., Texas:
Strobilomyces strobilaceus.

WHETSTONE, DR. M. S., Minnesota:

Panus torulosus— Hydnum albidum, probably from its small
Polystictus hirsutulus— Polystictus pergamenus— Trametes hispidus— Ste
reum spadiceum— Polyporus albellus— Polystictus hirsutus— Daedalea confra-
gosa— Polyporus sulphureus, discolored and also abnormal— Polyporus adus-
tus — Calvatia lilacina.

WILSON, REV. JAMES, Australia:

An excellent photograph of what is probably Polystictus pt

WOOTON, E. O., New Mexico:

Battarrea Stevenii— Montagnitis Candollei— Gyrophr
ens-Chlamydopus Meyenianus, cfr. Myc. Notes, p. 134, Plate 1<
plant in the United States. Known only from NYw .\
Wooton), and Washington (Piper).

WOULFF, E., Russia:
Irpex lacteus.

F. E. S., Syracuse, N. Y.:

Strobilomyces strobilaceus (or a form).
13

LETTER No. 31.

List (partial) of the specimens found by me on my return to Paris.
February, fWl. I am very much gratified with the liberal sendlngs of
specimens that I received on my return to Paris. There were about five
hundred specimens, including I am sure many rare species of tropical coun-
tries. The following is a list of those that I recognize, and there are a num-
ber of others yet undetermined.

The subject of the Polypores is so extensive, embracing over two thou-
sand alleged species, that it is impossible to carry it all in my mind. My
notes made in the various museums and my photographs have all been sent
to Kew, where I expect to work for the next three months. I will take the
undetermined specimens to Kew, and shall probably be able to determine
most of them. I will then publish a supplementary list Very little l»
known as to the foreign Polyporei. I hope my correspondents will continue
to send such specimens as come to their notice. It is only by contrast, com-
parison and familiarity, and abundant material that the truth can be learned
about them, and I shall be very grateful for specimens to aid in the work.

C. G. LLOYD,

February, 1911. No. 63 rue Button, Paris, France.

ALLEN, W. B., England:
Polyporus picipes.

BARKER, W. E., New Zealand:
Geaster triplex.

BRAUN, DR. K., German Africa:

Ganoderma nmngifera — Ganoderma mastoporus— Polystictus (Tra-
metes) obstinatus — Polystictus affinis— Polystictus occidentalis, thin form-
Lentinus dactyophorus, and a species of Polystictus very close to hirsute,
and a Polyporus unknown to me.

CHEEL, E., Australia:

A fine lot of puff balls including two rare ones.— Lycoperdon pur
pureum— Bovistella scabra— Catastoma anomalum, fine specimen showing
the exoperidium characters— Calvatia lilacina— Tylostoma McAlpinianum—
Mycenastrum Corium— Aseroe rubra, the type form— Scleroderma flavldum
—Geaster vittatus— Calvatia rubro-flava. This is the second time this ha»
reached me from Australia. It is now known from Australia, United State*.
Brazil, and Argentina.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANCE;

JAN 2 01942
i i ir> CD A R V

CAVE, G. H., India:

Polyporus gilvus — Fomes (Ganoderma) australis — Polystictus hir-
sutus, more uniformly gray than the common plant of Europe. — Polystictus
xanthopus, and others at present unknown to me.

EVANS, T. B., Transvaal:

Geaster floriformis — Geaster Schmidelii— Lycoperdon pratense —
Polysaccum crassipes.

FELIPPONE, DR. F., Uruguay:

Polystictus sanguinariu.s — Polystictus ciimabarinus — Polyporus gil-
vus— Polyporus adustus — Trametes hispida, darker brown and with coarser
hairs than the European plant. — Scleroderma Cepa— Lycoperdon (cfr. cruci-
atum) — Polystictus pinsitus — Polystictus versicolor, not exactly the same
plant as the European forms, but too close to be considered distinct. — Schi-
xophyllum commune — Three undetermined.

GONO, M., Japan:

Polyporus adustus, three collections, thick form — Polyporus adustus,
thin form — Lenzites protracta. Mr. Gono sends me four collections, and it is
evidently frequent in Japan. It is the same exactly as is common in the
United States and rare In Europe. — Polystictus versicolor — Several collec-
tions unknown to me.

JACZEWSKI, PROF. A. VOX, Russia:

Polystictus abietinus — Lenzites sepiaria — Polyporus amorphus —
Polyporus sulphureus— Fomes pinicola — Daedalea quercina — Fomes connatus
— Polyporus radiatus — Fomes fomentarius — Polystictus perennis— Poria me-
dulla-panis (?) — Polystictus lutescens, typical of Persoon's specimens—
Fomes robustus (?) — Polyporus fragilis (?) — Fomes pomaceus — Fomes leu-
cophaeus — Poria (sp.) — Polystictus zdnatus.

JAHANDIEZ, E., France:

Stereum hirsutum — Stereum spadiceum — Polyporus rufescens —
Polyporus circinatus — Polyporus hispidus — Polyporus lucidus — Fomes robus-
tus (?) — Fomes pinicola — Fomes (sp ?) — Fomes torulosus (young ?)• —
Polystictus pergamenus — Polystictus abietinus — Polystictus perennis — Hyd-
num velutinum — Hydnum scobiculatum (?) — Hydnum ferruginosum — Hyd-
num nigrum — Trametes pini — Trametes campestris.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia:

Crucibulum vulgare — Geaster saccatus — Boletus (sp.) — Polyporus
betulinus — Polyporus squamosus, more reddish brown than the European
form but surely the same species. — Fomes applanatus (approaching leuco-
phaeus) — Polystictus affinis (subsessile) — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Fuligo
septica— Schizophyllum commune— Guepinia spathulata— Polystictus hir-
sutus, and a number of others as yet not determined.

KIRTIKAR, COL. K. R., India:

Leuzites ochroleucus, a curious, irpicoid form-Lenzite* ochroh-u, MS
daedaloid form— Lenzites ochroleucus, lenzitoid form-Hexagona mil.
-Polyporus lucidus, tropical form, spores distinctly rough — Polysti. tn.
xanthopus— Polystictus flavus-Lycoperdon or Calvatla (?) Seems dOM m
polymorphum-Lycoperdon nigrum— Several specimens not yet determine,!

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige:

Fomes australis— Polystictus concinnus— Polystictus occidentals
Polystictus flavus— Lenzites repanda— Trametes Persoonii— Sternum lol.a
turn— Polyporus lucidus, curiously developed sterile form— Polystl. -in,
xanthopus, very abundant— Polystictus concinnus, mixed with xanili.,|..i-.
and it may be only a velutinate form of it but it appears very .li.xtiurt.
Polystictus sanguineus— Hexagona Henschallii, sent abundantly by .Mr. l.uja.
Previously known in Europe from a single specimen at Kew.— Polyporu-
gilvus— Trametes Hystrix. These specimens are not dimidiate, but in
by a short stipe-like base.— Hexagona, a very distinct species that will soon
be illustrated in Mycological Notes.— In addition two uniiaim •<! »p«
Hexagona and a species of Fomes not recognized by me.

MACBRIDE, PROFESSOR T. H., Iowa:
Schenella simplex, co-type specimen.

McALPINE, D., Australia.
Geaster triplex.

MENEZES, CARLOS A. DE, Maderia:

Scleroderma verrucosum (?) Peridium smooth. Spores more n-iicu
late. — Polystictus versicolor — Boletus bovinus — Schizophyllum commune
Fomes pomaceus — Fomes torulosus — Ganoderma resinaeeus.

O'CONNOR, CHAS. A., Mauritius:

Polystictus sanguineus — Lycoperdon, close to pirifonm> as to habits,
but differs in having no columella. Hyaline, septate, capillitium and smooth,
ovate spores. — Polyporus gilvus— Hirneola auricula-Judae— Polyporus (Gano-
derma) mastoporus, compared with type at Paris.— Polystictus flabellifor-
mis, same as types which were from Mauritius— Fomes fasciatus, whic-h is
the tropical representation of Fomes fomentarius of the temperate regions.-
Trametes Hystrix, only known from Africa, and often confused with Tra-
metes hydnoides. — Lenzites repanda— Geaster mirabilis— Schizophylliim
commune — Morchella (cfr. conica, but much more deeply alveolate).— Aseroe
Zeylandica. This is the first definite knowledge we have had of
Aseroe from Africa.— Phallus indusiatus. M'fr. Myc. Notes for an inter,
account by Mr. O'Connor of the variations of this sp.-ri.-s in Mauritius.)
Simblum periphragmoides, an abnormal, double spi-i -inn-n. but unfortunatel
broken in transit.

OLIVIER, ERNEST, France:

Polyporus (close to albidus)— Fon.es pomai-eus— Stereum hir.-inmi.
—Fomes rlbls— Corticium (sp.)- Fomes ai-planatus-Polyporus adus
Polystictus versicolor— Polyporus tamaricis.

PANAU, CHARLES, Prance:

Polystictus Montagnei, a rare plant in both Europe and the United
States.

PATTERSON, W. H., West Indies:

Polystictus occidentalis — Polystictus pinsitus — Polystictus rigens —
Polystictus lutescens— Lenzites saepiaria — Hirneola auricula-Judae — Schi-
zophyllum commune — Polystictus versicolor, thick, tropical form.

FETCH, T., Ceylon:

Specimen sent as "Fomes lucidus, perennial," but it has different
spores, and I think Polyporus lucidus is never perennial.

READER, F. M., Australia:

Calvatia, unnamed, I think. Capillitium hyaline, septate. Spores
smooth, guttulate, 4 mic. Gleba olive.— Scleroderma flavidum.

PAUL, J. T., Australia:

Scleroderma flavidum — Polysaccum pisocarpium — Polyporus betuli-
nus, an old friend from a new locality. — Polystictus cinnabarinus — TJrnula
(sp.) — Also several Stereums, etc., unknown to me at present.

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Lenzites erubescens. "First pores yellow, then reddish. Often with-
out stalk." — Polyporus lignosus — Polyporus gilvus — Lenzites repanda — Poly-
porus (or Polystictus) licnoides. Exactly the same as the type in Montagne's
herbarium. Thin forms of gilvus often pass for it in the Southern United
States. — Polyporus squamosus (tropical form)— Polyporus cubensis, usually
called "Fomes hemileucus," which is the same plant but it is not a Fomes. —
Favolus brasiliensis— A number of others not determined.

TURNER, MISS E. J., Australia:

Hydnangium (probably australe, Berk.) — Stereum hirsutum — Poria
— Polystictus cinnabarinus — Stereum (section Podoscypha) — Stereum (sec-
tion Lloydiella) — Clathrus gracilis — Peziza (sp.)— Clavaria (sp.)— Lycoper-
don nigrum — Genus (?) — Panus (?).

USSHER, C. B., Straits Settlements:

Polystictus xanthopus (and fine photograph) — Polystictus Persoonii.
These are the thinnest specimens I have ever noticed, and could well be
classed as Polystictus. Usually it is much thicker, anjl is classed as Tra-
metes. — Lycoperdon Wrightii (yellow form) — Trametes obstinatus — Xylaria
— Clavaria, most peculiar, with a fine photograph. — Hygrophorus, growing on
Termites nests. I have sent it to Professor Fetch, who makes a study of
the fungi of Termites nests.— Lachnocladium — Lentinus— Mutinus bambusi-
nus, a fine photograph that will be published soon. — Several polyporoids
Which I do not recognize at present, including one which is very peculiar,
and which I am sure is unnamed.

VANDERYST, REV. HYAC., Congo Beige:

Pomes australis — Lenzites repanda— Polystictus sanguineus— Poly
stictus flavus— Polyporus gilvus— Trametes cingulatus— Polystictus occiden
talis — A number of specimens not determined.

WEIDMANN, A., Bohemia:

Polyporus borealis— Polyporus amorphus, white form— Pomes con-
natus— Fomes pinicola— Polyporus pubescens (?)— Fomes foment;.'
Polyporus amorphus, reddish form. Same color as dlchrous, but on pine.—
Poria callosa (?)— Poria sp — Polyporus rufescens— Polystlctu.s
Lenzites abietina — Polyporus brumalis— Polyporus radiatus.

WOOD, J. MEDLEY, Africa:

Lentinus dactyliophorus— Lysurus Woodii, photograph of dried spec-
imen— Lepiota (sp.) with notes and drawing.

YOSHINAGA, T., Japan:

Polystictus pergamenus — Polystictus pergamenus with a short st«-m
and pale pores. — Polystictus, affected with an orange parasite (probably
Hyphomyces) — Lenzites repanda. This specimen has a reddish stain at the
base which I think is not normal.— Polystictus afflnis— Lenzites protracta—
Polystictus sanguineus — Polystictus azureus — Polystictus versicolor — A num-
ber of others as yet undetermined.

ZENKER, G., Africa:

Polystictus sanguineus— Polyporus lignosus— Polystictus occ-idon
talis — Polystictus incomptus. This appeared in my recent pamphlet as P.
Holstii as named by Hennings, which is the same as incomptus, except that
it is mesopodal. The type specimen of incomptus has a lateral stem, hence
was referred by me to flabelliformis, but Patouillard calls my attention to
Fries' figure of incomptus which is mesopodal. Fries did not consider the
stem insertion of value, and included both forms. As it is a little inconsist-
ent to consider that Dr. Hennings discovered such a common plant in Africa
to be a "new species" at such a late date, I now think that Fries' name should
be taken on the strength of his picture and not of his specimen.— L> «
don, unnamed, I think. It has the general habits and appearance of being
little specimens of piriforme with the same abundant, white, mycelial
threads. Structure quite different. No columella. Capillltium *•/"'»"
Spores globose, 4 mic., smooth.

UNKNOWN DONOR (Bag B20). from Australia:

Polystictus sanguineus— Trametes Muellerii— Trametes Mueller!!.
thin form— Also a Lentinus and a Trametes unknown to me.

LETTER No. 32.

List of determinations made at Kew. Most of these specimens were
received by me at Paris, but I desired to work further with them before
naming them. All concerning which I had any doubt whatever were sent to
Rev. Bresadola, who I think has the best critical knowledge of Polyporoid
species. In those cases where our views do not coincide, I give both. A
number of specimens have reached me that I do not find to be named. I do
not name them but indicate them, and would much prefer that the corre-
spondent who sent the specimen would name and publish it. When this is
done I hope I shall be advised so that I can adopt the name published. I
prefer to name species only when writing systematically on the subject,
and only in the event that they are not otherwise named.

April, 1911. C. G. LLOYD.

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Polyporus lentinoides as named by Hennings as a variety of Poly-
porus squamosus. I think it is a smooth, firm form of the European spe-
cies, but worthy of a separate name.

CAVE, G. H., India, (No. 12):

For me this is unnamed, and I will call it in a forthcoming publica-
tion on the stipitate polyporoids, Polyporus subvirgatus. It is close to
Polyporus virgatus of the American tropics. Teste Bresadola— it is too

close to dictyopus.

CAVE, G. H., India, (No. 3):

Polyporus aquosus as named by Hennings, and Polypor
toides by Berkeley. I shall use Hennings' name, as Berkeley's has no meai
ing in connection with the plant. Both were from Brazil.
Mr. Cave's plant is the same as the American species, but it is close
fresh it is soft, fleshy, and watery, probably white. Spores
plant are 6-8 x 14-16. Not found in either collection from Brazil.

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

A thin, tropical form of Polyporus squamosus which- m
special name. It is quite different from fusco-maculatus «
labeled.

O'CONNOR, CHAS. A., Mauritius, (No. 6):

Polvporus albellus as named by Massee, though the name
duplicate, having been used by Peck. For me it is a form oi
cephalus (not for Bresadola).

Trichina, same as tm except it has ,ost its
hairs. Sent aV™,is«BerM which is same thin,

AT LOS AKGELES

JAN 2 0 1942

COTTON, A. D., England:

Thelephora spiculosa. Mr. Cotton tells me this is frequent in
England, but I think it is not in their text-books. Very rare in the United
States, where I have seen it but once. Confirmed by Bresadola.

CROSSLAND, CHARLES, (from Australia) :

Trametes lactinea. It is pure white when fresh.

ZENKER, DR. G., Kamerun, Africa, (No. 9):

Lenzites nivea, which I take to be only the lenzitoid form of Hex-
agona albida (cfr. Hexagona Synopsis, fig. 313), and only a smoother form
of Lenzites aspera. From Africa Dr. Zenker sends all lenzitoid forms. In
Samoa I found usually the hexagonal forms.

VANDERYST, REV. HYAC, Congo Beige:

Polystictus (or Trametes) cristatus. Compared with type at Kew.
It is said that Zollingeriana is the same thing. If so, cristatus is a much
better name for it.

ZENKER, DR. G., Kamerun (No. 8):

Lenzites repanda. The thinnest specimen of this common, trop-
ical (and much-named) species I ever saw. These are hardly thicker than
a sheet of paper.

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Polyporus (or Trametes) Feei, the only type of which is at Paris
(sent by Fee). It is not a Polystictus as found in Saccardo, but is very
close to Polyporus carneus "Nees" of the United States, if not the same.
Rev. Rick reports it "common in Brazil."

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Polystictus versatilis, a frequent plant in the tropics. The fresh
specimens have rose-colored pores, a character that disappears from the old
herbarium specimens. It was called Polystictus villosus by Murrill, probably
because that was an earlier date, for the plants have no resemblance what-
ever. Bresadola advised me that it is also Polyporus Spegazzinii, which
he based on specimens misnamed Polyporus Drummondii by Spegazzini.
Spegazzini also called it Polystictus Hariotii according to specimens at
Paris. Spegazzini was more liberal than particular in passing his com-
pliments around.

YOSHINAGA, T., Japan, (No. 18):

Trametes Dickinsii. Compared with type at Kew which came from
Japan. It seems to me quite close to paleacea of Africa, but Bresadola says
it is quite distinct from that species.

FETCH, T., Ceylon:

Unnamed species of mesopodal Polyporus. Mr. Fetch tells me
that it grows in circles in Ceylon. I am sure Thwaites never sent it to
Berkeley.

ZENKER, DR. G., Kamerun, (No. 7):

Fayolus, I think unnamed. Teste Bresadola, it is Favolus prin-
ceps and Polyporus megaloporus, all three of which have the same and very
peculiar cystidia, but appear to me to differ in other respects.

CROSSLAND, CHARLES, from locality unknown:

Polystictus, I believe unnamed, though it is close to perennis. It
was referred by Cooke to cinnamomeus; surely an error.

GONO, M., Japan, (Nos. 8, 9, and 12):

Trametes (or Daedalea) I believe unnamed, close to Trametes
sepium. It is referred by Bresadola to styracina of Hennings, which ac-
cording to my photograph seems different to me.

GONO, M., Japan, (No. 6):
Not developed.

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige, (No. 20):
Trametes unnamed.

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige:
Hexagona Pobeguini.

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige:

Hexagona dermatiphora, recently published in Mycological Notes.

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Fomes sulcatus as named by Cooke from Venezuela. This has
been referred to hornodermus of Africa and the East, but I think it differs
in large pores, more punk-like context, and in the context turning dark
when cut.

KIRTIKAR, COL. K. R., India, (No. 9) :

Polystictus acutus of Cooke. Compared with the type = (teste
Bresadola) floccosus of Junghuhn.

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige:

Polystictus caperatus. Not so strongly zoned as usual.

YOSHINAGA, T., Japan:

Polystictus, close to versicolor.

NOTE 5. It develops that Polyporus osseus of Europe occurs in the fnit-
It is not recorded, I think, hence was not compiled in X. A. K. I Imvo known it many
years, having collected it years ago in the Adirondacks ; but I never had a name for it
until recently when I sent it to Bresadola. The European plant in white. Our plant
a grayish surface, but I think is the saim- as the European. I do not think that pueu
can be entered in any of Fries' sections. It is a "new genus" in fact. I would
it in a section "Petaloides-Imbricatus."

NOTE 6. The species common with us, which is now generally known M P«nu«
rudis, and which was previously known as Lentinus Lecomptei for so man
or absent from Western Europe, but seems to be common in Eastern AIJ
I have it abundantly from several correspondents in Austria I note
distributed three times in Knl.enhorst's Exsic. (Nos. 212, 1207. and 2403)
Swainsonii, Lev. and Panus Hoffmann!, Pries, is given as a sy

colored species, as is this type. Fries described it as thin, and it passes in Saccardo as a
Polystictus. It is not a Pplystictus but a lignescent Polyporus, or perhaps a Trametes.
Rev. Rick finds it common in Brazil.

NOTE 8. Polyporus Palliser. I doubt if there was ever a worse confusion made
in "science" than the publication of this species. There are two specimens found in
Berkeley's herbarium, both the same collection (?), surely the same plant. One was
labeled "Polyporus Palliser, Berk., Palliser, Brit. N. Am. Exp. Expedition, col. E. Bour-
-" " "

gean, 1857-8." The other is labeled "Trametes arcticus, Carleton, Brit. Amer. 1858."
It Is certainly only a form, but quite a distinct form of Polyporus carneus, "Nees, " so
common on pine in the Eastern United States. Whether our carneus grows in Jav

whether Nees ever saw it is quite another story. I have just received a fine specimen of
the plant from Dr. W. H. Henderson, California, which corresponds exactly on comparison
with the specimens at Kew. The context and pores are the same as the ordinary form
of Polyporus carneus, but the surface is silvery white with appressed fibrils, and is a
very different looking plant from the usual form. However, it is in the publication that
the scientific part comes in. As previously stated, Berkeley labeled one specimen "Poly-
porus Palliser ; ' ' another, which is surely the same and probably of the same collection,
"Trametec arcticus, Berk." He never published either. Cooke referred to "Polyporus
Palliser, ' ' an Australian species which had little resemblance to it, and which had then
been named twice by Berkeley. He published (Grev. 10, 98) "Polyporus Palliseri, Berk,
in Hab. Victoria, Queensland," and drew his description from his Australian misdetermina-
tion. He included it the next year in the section of Fomes with "rhabarbarino v. ferrug-
ineo" context (it had just been described as having white context) as "Fomes Palliseri,
Berk, in Herb. — Trametes arcticus, Berk.," and Saccardo so compiles it in vol. 6, p. 20i,
as coming from Victoria, Queensland, and gives the description drawn from the Australian
misdetermination. Cooke (Grev. 15, 20) describes "Polyporus argentatus, Cooke — P.
Palliseri, Grev. 10, 98 (non-Berk.)" this time in the section "mollis" of Polyporus,
though less than a year before he had referred the same plant to Fomes. He gives ex-
actly the same description that he previously gave, and Saccardo again compiles it (in
Polyporus) with exactly the same description word for word as he described to "Fomes
Palliseri, Berk, in Herb." on another page.

Taking all this into consideration I can not figure out that our American plant has
ever been formally described. As it appeared in Saccardo as coming from Australia it
was of course not compiled in North American Flora, although the specimens at Kew came
from North America and the author of North American Flora claims to have made ex-
haustive studies of the American species at Kew.

NOTE 9. "Polyporus valenzuelianus ( — sapinus ?) ( — hemileucus)" — Letter
No. 30. This should read Polyporus cubensis ( • — supinus ?) ( — ' hemileucus).

Polyporus cubensis is a plant that is quite peculiar, but changes with age so that
it has been badly confused. When fresh it is white, and Montagne so described his speci-
mens ; but with age a dark red stain develops on the upper surface, and finally the whole
plant becomes dark. The type of cubensis has that character now and the change has
been quite evident since Montagne described it. Hemileucus of Berkeley is the same
plant, also valenzuelianus in the sense of Berkeley (not Montagne). Polyporus (not
Fomes as found in Saccardo) supinus is doubtful to me. The only type I have seen is in
the British Museum. It is small and old, and difficult to determine. Berkeley misde-
termined valenzuelianus (and endorsed — resupinatus, Swartz). Cooke used the date
dictionary and gave this as a synonym for supinus, and Murrill rakes it up and arranges
it with his date dictionary and takes supinus as the earliest date. It is quite an early
date, and also quite a different plant.

NOTE 10. Xylaria tentaculata. On several occasions I have received from Miss
Mary Fitzgerald a curious plant that I have been unable to determine. It had hyaline,
conidial spores, but never did I find a specimen with ascus spores. I sent it to several
and no one could determine it. Recently I received from Miss Fitzgerald a single speci-
. men of a very peculiar Xylaria with perfect spores and little processes such as I know in
no other species of Xylaria. I looked up the "literature" and supposed it was Xylaria
tentaculata, "described" by Berkeley from South Carolina. I so published it (Letter No.
30) with a question mark. At Kew I recently looked up the type of Xylaria tentaculata.
It is not the plant I so determined, but is the plant that has so long puzzled me, and
which I doubt is even a Xylaria. All of which goes to show how much can be learned
from our literature.

NOTE 11. Correction. — In Letter No. 29 the last sentence of the report of plants
from H. H. Bartlett, beginning with "while occasionally," does not refer to Scleroderma
verrucosum but to Polyporus cristatus, the latter name being omitted through error.

NOTE 12. Polyporus carneus, or Fomes carneus as it is called, is quite frequent in the
United States. It is referred to "Nees," who published from Java a picture from which
our American plant was named. I think it is quite doubtful if the reference is correct,
as I do not know this species from Java ; but it is immaterial as the name for our American
plant is so firmly fixed that it would only cause confusion and avail nothing to try to
chang« it. Polyporus carneus has been given in Europe (and copied in America) as a
synonym for Fomes roseus of Europe. In my opinion that is an error. They are quite

different plants. Fomes roseus is a true Fomes, ungulate in shape, and as to form

s Fomes fomentarius. Polyporus carneus is always thin and flat. I think it is
rather a ligneous Polyporus than a Fomes. It is very close to Polyporus Feei of South

America, perhaps the same species, and Polyporus Feei passes (in error, however)
Polystictus (sic).

LETTER No. 33.

List of determinations made, at Kew. Most of these specimens were
received by me at Paris, but I desired to work further with them before
naming them. All concerning which I had any doubt whatever were sent to
Rev. Bresadola, who I think has the best critical knowledge of the Polypo-
roid species. In those cases where our views do not coincide, I give both.
A number of specimens have reached me that I do not find to be named. I
do not name them, but indicate them, and would much prefer that the corre-
spondent who sent the specimen would name and publish it. When this is
done I hope I shall be advised so that I can adopt the name published. I
prefer to name species only when writing systematically on the subject, and
only in the event that they are not otherwise named.

May, 1911. C. G. LLOYD.

YOSHINAGA, T., Japan, (No. 11):

Lenzites subferruginea, compared with the type at Kew. Named
by Berkeley fifty years ago. Discovered to be a new species by Murrill, and
called Lenzites edule.

YOSHINAGA, T., Japan, (No. 12):

Lenzites nivea, which is only a smoother form of Lenzites aspi-ra.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia, (Nos. 14, 18, 27):
Stereum illudens.

YOSHINAGA, T., Japan, (No. 2):

Stereum princeps as named by Junghuhn (Stereum vespilloneum,
vegetale, and contrarium all seem to me to be the same thing).

PAUL, J. T., Australia:
Stereum lobatum.

PAUL, J. T., Australia:

Stereum Thozetii. The type is small, but I think it en-
very well. It is the only one at Kew to which I can refer it
aline guttulate, smooth, globose, 4 mic.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia, (No. 31):

Stereum. This seems to be frequent in Australia, as I
sendings. I did not succeed in finding it at Kew, however.

UNIVERSITY dF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES
1 A M 0 0

albobadium of the United States, same color of hymenium, but it has a
strongly reflexed portion and is otherwise different. The hymenium is
densely covered with crested, hyaline cystidia, hence a "new genus" no
doubt.

KIRTIKAR, COL. K. R., India:

Polystictus dermatodes. This was reported in Letter No. 31 as
Polystictus flavus, but on examining it at Kew I find it has a different struc-
ture. The cystidia are the same as the genus Peniophora.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia, (No. 31 p.p.):
Stereum Thozetii.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia, (No. 25):
Stereum vellereum.

O'CONNOR, CHARLES, Mauritius, (No. 14):

Fomes (Ganoderma) which I think is not named if it is normal.
The tissue is hard, horny, and appears entirely different from the ordinary
context of similar species. I find several similar specimens in the museum
referred to Fomes australis, but I question the reference. I believe Fomes
scansilis to be a similar abnormality of Fomes australis.

FETCH, T., Ceylon:

Polyporus ochroleucus. An old, exolete specimen, such as Berkeley
called Fomes compressus. When fresh the species is white, but the herbarium
specimens gradually turn reddish brown with age. I have specimens from
Japan which were white when I received them a year ago, now all are dis-
colored. When exposed to weather the specimens become black (such as
this from Mr. Petch), and would never suggest any relation even to the
fresh, white plant. It seems to be of wide distribution, Australia, Ceylon,
Japan, etc., but is absent from American regions.

LUJA, EDMUND, Congo Beige:

Ganoderma (unnamed) close to lucidus and mangifera. Spores
5 x 10, smooth. Context too pale for mangifera though color, surface, and
pores are similar.

O'CONNOR, CHARLES, Mauritius, (No. 2):

Trametes unnamed, I believe. White with a dull upper surface, re-
sembling Lenzites repanda. Poor, small, round isabelline. In general ap-
pearance close to Lenzites repanda, but as to pores it is quite different.

BRAUN, DR. K., German Africa:

Daedalea albo-fuscus as named by Patouillard. I have not seen
the type which was described as irpicoid. I should class these specimens
in Polystictus, close to biformis.

O'CONNOR, CHARLES, Mauritius, (No. 11):

Fomes pachyphloeus. This species has very peculiar, microscopic
structure, from which it can not be recognized. Superficially r
Fomes fasciatus for which I at first mistook it without examining it

FELIPPONE, DR. FLORENTINO, Uruguay, (No. 447):

Fomes (unnamed). Context rhei color. Spores colored, sulurlo-
bose, 6-7 mic. Setae not found. The above are the leading features of Uu-
species. It is close to Fomes Eberhartii of the United States, which, how-
ever, has abundant setae. It may have been named by Spegazzini, but in
Europe there is no way of knowing what he has named.

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige:

Polyporus vinosus, much thicker than the type from the West
Indies, but on comparison I think it is the same. The peculiar, dark,
vinous color of the pores is quite characteristic, and the plant is well named.
Bresadola (cfr. Rev. Myc. 1890, p. 31) gives also the following synoi
badius, Jungh. Zoll. Plant. Java No. 10; Mollerinus, Saccardo, vol. 9, p
and tristis as Trametes by Leveille. These specimens are quite dimidiate,
but it is said to vary, sometimes stipitate.

USSHER, C. B., Straits Settlements, (No. 12):

Fomes mirabilis (as Mr. Ussher will call it). A unique sp-
not approximating any ether known. Pileus hard, woody, with a hard,
rugulose, zoned, smooth crust which is brown when wet, pale when dry.
Context yellowish when wet but pale when dry, hard, woody with hyaline
hyphae. Pores minute, hard, woody, pale brownish context with stuffed,
bright yellow mouths. Spores globose, 7-8, light brown color, smooth. This
plant is strongly marked, the only Fomes known with such strongly yello
pore mouths. As to spores it is an Amaurodermus (section), as to
pore color, and general appearance it is a Ganodermus (section), and it i
neither.

JAR VIS, EDMUND, Australia:

Fomes pomaceus (form). This Australian form has
microscopic characters as the common plant of Europe but the con
is brighter (rhei), and the pore mouths are soft to the touch.
tralian has these features as a usual character, it should have a m
variety.

LUJA, EDOUARD, Congo Beige:

Fomes unknown to me. In its external characters, tl
margin, purplish, velutinate hymenium, it is like torulosus, but t
are pale colored, globose 3^-4.

= Daedalea moUis, tart. Bresado... I 8hou.d

never have so referred it.

CAVE, G. H., Bengal, (No. 6):

Polystictus pergamenus, old discolored ? ?

YOSHINAGA, PROFESSOR T., Japan, (No. 7):

Polyporus unnamed, close to Polyporus cuticularis. Spores abun-
dant, 3x4, colored. Setae none.

RICK, REV., Brazil:

Fomes (unnamed) (or Trametes ?). Pores and context exactly
like those of Trametes hydnoides, except pores are in distinct strata. Sur.-
face hairs quite different from those of hydnoides, being fine and >intttwl.
Bresadola suggests perhaps a lapsus of Trametes hydnoides.

YOSHINAGA, PROFESSOR T., Japan (No. 24):
Fomes not developed and not determinable.

YOSHINAGA, PROFESSOR T., Japan, (No. 1):

Polyporus semilaccatus, teste Bresadola. The specimen is not as
old or as dark colored as the type at Kew. The punky context reminds me
of young Fomes fraxineus of Europe.

FELIPPONE, DR. FLORENTINO, Uruguay, (No. 449):

Unknown to me. Teste Bresadola it is an abortive specimen of
Fomes Auberianus. ,

VANDERYST, REV. H., Congo Beige:

Unknown to me, but teste Bresadola it is Polystictus auriculi-
formis. It has the same context and spines as gilvus, but is thin. The sur-
face is velutinate, otherwise close to licnoides of the American tropics which
has smooth, reddish zones in the type form.

YOSHINAGA, PROFESSOR T., Japan, (No. 15):
Daedalea styracina, old, effete.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia, (No. 12):

Polyporus ochroleucus. This is characterized by its large, truncate
spores. It is common in Australia and the East, but absent from American
territory.

CAVE, G. H., India, (No. 10):

Polyporus adustus, old, effete.

JARVIS, EDMUND, Australia, (No. 23):

Polyporus lilacino-gilvus. The surface of this collection is strongly
scrupose with appressed fibrils, which is not always so marked in this spe-
cies. No. 21 is the same but a thin form.

LETTER No. 34.

Specimens received since last report. I beg to thank those who continue
to favor me with specimens. I am now working on the Polyporoid |
and shall be particularly grateful to receive specimens of this group.

May> 19n- C. G. LLOYD.

BATES, REV. J. M., Nebraska:

Tylostoma campestris — Polyporus gilvus.

DE BELLAING, J., England:
Polyporus squamosus.

BRENCKLE, DR. J. F., North Dakota:

Daedalea unicolor — Favolus europaeus — Trametes hispida, with
white context — Polystictus versicolor — Stereum frustulosum— Schizophyl-
lum commune — Scleroderma tenerum — Fomes (on cottonwood) unknown to
me. It has the same setae and spores as Fomes pomaceus, and .similar con-
text, but the general appearance is different.

CAHN, MRS. J. A., Michigan:

Polyporus lucidus — Favolus europaeus — Polystictus hirsutus —
Polystictus versicolor — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Polyporus albellus — Poly-
porus picipes — Stereum complicatum — Stereum fasciatum — Lenzites sai-pi
aria — Polyporus brumalis — Polyporus resinosus — Polyporus (unknown to
me).

CHESTENNOW, N., Russia: .

Daedalea unicolor — Daedalea sulphurella, Pk. as labeled, but (It--
termination is very doubtful. — Cyathus vernicosus — Corticium polygonium
— Bovista nigrescens, more probably plumbea.— Stereum hirsutum— Schi/.o
phyllum commune — Polyporus squamosus — Fomes fomentarius — Da.
quercina — Polystictus versicolor — Polystictus hirsutus — Fomes fomentarius
— Panus stipticus — Panus rudis. It will be noted that these specimens from
the distant Caucasian Mountains of Russia are almost all the same as the
common species of Europe, a further evidence of the wide distribution of the
species of fungi.

CROSSLAND, CHARLES, England:

Lycoperdon cepaeforme— Bovista nigrescens, young— Polyporus
fumosus, much thinner than ordinary— Polyporus dryadeus— Trametes cer-
vinus— Polyporus adustus— Polyporus tephroleucus— Polyporus lacteus (?)

I

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT 103 ANGELES

JAN 2 01942

— Poria rancida — Polyporus chioneus, in sense of Bresadola, Fung. Kmet. —
Polyporus caesius — Poria sang-uinolenta, spores globose, 5 mic. — Lenzites
repanda, from Australia — Fomes australis, from Australia.

DUMEE, MONSIEUR, France:
Fomes salicinus.

FISHER, PROFESSOR G. C., Maryland:

Polyporus sulphureus — Fomes connatus— Arachnion album — Dae-
dalea confragosa — Poria Andersonii, colored spores and setae — Lentinus
blepharodes, B. & C. Compared with the type at Kew. It undoubtedly
has other names, however. Years ago it was determined for me in Europe
as Lentinus Berterii, which was a species of India, but I am sure of bleph-
arodes, not of the other.

GLATFELTER, N. M., Missouri:
Polyporus robiniophila.

GRIFFIN, D. B., Vermont:

Polyporus lucidus — Daedalea quercina — Fomes leucophaeus — Fo-
mes leucophaeus tending toward vegetus. — Fomes Eberhartii.

HANMER, C. C., Connecticut:

Tylostoma mammosum, a bleached specimen, collected near Rome,
Italy.

HARIOT, P., France:

Poria nitida, color fresh, but I am told was a little yellow when
fresh. Vystidia abundant, large. Spores 4-5x5-6, hyaline, smooth, with
granular contents, not guttulate.

HAWLEY, H. C., England:

Polyporus salignus — Polyporus chioneus in the sense of Bres. Fung.
Kmet. I have not been able to decide as to chioneus.

HENDERSON, DR. W. H., California:

Polystictus versicolor — Polyporus Palliser, a species named from
British America, misdescribed and misascribed to Australia in Saccardo. It
is close to Polyporus carneus if not a form of it, but has a silvery white sur-
face with appressed fibrils. A bad mess was made of its publication. This
specimen has been compared with the type. — Bovista plumbea.

JONES, MRS. W. C., Washington:

Crepidotus variabilis — Crucibulum vulgare — Secotium acuminatum
— Calvatia caelata, smooth form — Merulius lacrymans, a large, thick, white
pad just beginning to form its pores. This is the celebrated "dry-rot" that
causes so much destruction to floors, etc., and concerning which books have
been written. — Lycoperdon piriforme.

2

KAWAMURA, PROFESSOR S., Japan:

Colored sketches of Pseudocolus Javanicus and Laternea bi-

columnata.

LUDWIG, MONSIEUR, France:

Pilacre faginea. I was most glad to get these specimens fresh, as
I have never collected it.— Fomes salicinus— Poria (cfr. contifcua).

LUJA, EDOUARD, Africa:

Clathrus Fischeri. Nicely dried specimens with* color notes which
demonstrate, I think, that this is a good species, clearly distinct from Clath-
rus cibarius of Australia.— Clathrus camerunensis. This is th.
I have received this species. It is a question if it is not the same as
Clathrus pusillus of Australia.

MAINGAUD, E., France:

Polyporus betulinus— Trametes Bulliardii— Polystictus hirsm
Polystictus hirsutus, fauve form = lutescens, Pers.— Peniophora quercina
(determined by Miss Wakefield).

FETCH, PROFESSOR T., Ceylon:

Fomes dochmius, compared with the type— Polyporus rhinoci
heretofore only known from two specimens at Kew from Malay. — Poria
Ravenelii, a black species quite common on palm stems in Ceylon. — Fomes
subresinosus, recently and badly named. A common plant in the museums
formerly wrongly referred to Fomes nigro-laccatus. — Polystictus versicolor,
growing on the elevated regions of Ceylon.

ROLFS, P. H., England:

Fomes applanatus — Poria versipora — Fomes pomaceus— Polyporus
cuticularis — Polystictus versicolor — Polyporus adustus — Polyporus lucidus —
Polyporus squamosus — Polystictus hirsutus.

SWANTON, E. W., England:

Fomes pomaceus — Fomes ribis — Daedalea unicolor — Fomes anno-
sus. One specimen grew in a perpendicular position and produced a nodular
form exactly the same as shown in Bulliard's figure of Polyporus cryptaruni.
It is not Bulliard's "species," however, for the context color is different, but
it demonstrates that the peculiar shape of Bulliard's figure is simply due to
growing in an abnormal position, and has no specific importance.

SUKSDORF, W. N., Washington:

Crucibulum vulgare — Polysaccum crassipes, a nice specimen —
Geaster rufescens — Nidula microcarpa, rare, occurring only in the North-
west.—Geopora Cooperi, according to the description. Tuberaceous plants
are rarely received. The spores of this specimen are 16 x 28
occidentalis— Lycoperdon piriforme (yellow form)— Geaster hygrometricus
(unopened)— Lycoperdon cupricum— Lycoperdon piriforme— Lycoperdon
piriforme (form)— Lycoperdon umbrinum— Lycoperdon atropurpureun
five collections of Rhizopogon, species I can not determine from dried sped-

TRASK, MRS. BLANCHE, California:

Tylostoma campestris, growing in a low valley, 75 feet below the
level of the sea. The genus Tylostoma is the only one that would be likely
to be found in such a situation.

USSHER, C. B., Straits Settlements:
Phallus indusiatus (dried).

WHETSTONE, DR. M. S., Minnesota:

Hydnum pulcherrimum. Compared with the type at Kew. I judge
that Hydnum cirratum from Lea, as determined by Berkeley was the same
plant. I think Hydnum cirratum does not grow at Cincinnati. — Stereum
fasciatum — Hypochnus rubro-cinctus, Ehrenb., probably a lichen. Deter-
mined.by Miss Wakefield.

NOTE.— Crowded out of Letter No. 26.

STERLING, E. B., New Jersey:

Schizophyllum commune — Pleurotus dryinus, teste Peck — Stereum
spadiceum — Polyporus dichrous — Polyporus gilvus, abnormal — Poria radula
— Polyporus brumalis — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Polystictus hirsutulus —
Asterostroma, a peculiar genus, but the species not known to me — Merulius
Corium ( ? ) — Polyporus gilvus — Panus stipticus — Lenzites corrugata — Peziza
aurantia — Phallus duplicatus-»-Phallus Ravenelii, both phalloids in quantity
— Fomes leucophaeus— Paxillus atrotomentosus — Hydnum ochraceum — Hy-
pocrea alutacea (a rare plant)— Craterellus cornucopioides, abnormal form —
Polyporus Berkeleyii — Polyporus (sp. unknown to me) — Polystictus perga-
menus, abnormal — Guepinia Peziza, the first time I have received it — Poly-
stictus locicola — Irpex pachylon — Xylaria (sp.) — Polystictus versicolor —
Panus rudis — Daedalea unicolor — Cantharellus minor^Thelephora multipar-
tita (rare) — Fomes rimosa — Clavaria aurea — Lenzites betulina — Lentinus
vulpinus — Lentodium squamulosum — Lenzites vialis — Daedalea confragosa
— Polystictus hirsutus — Urnula Craterium — Craterellus cornucopioides —
Clavaria (with a parasite) — Polystictus pergamenus — Polyporus brumalis —
Tremella (close to foliac'eus or fimbriatus) — Geoglossum hirsutum — Canthar-
ellus cibarius — Stereum versicolor — Bulgaria rufa — Stereum sericeum — Fis-
tulina hepatica, caiiiduil form, teste Patouillard. Very curious. The first time
I ever saw it. Hypocreaceae. Probably a new genus, teste Patouillard. Im-
mature.— Genus, very curious, unknown to me or to Patouillard. — Hypomy-
ces Lactifluorum — Cyclomyces Greenii (?) (old specimen) — Poria tulipif era
— Thelephora terrestris — Daedalea confragosa, a very peculiar, thin form,
which I receive only from Mr. Sterling. It is close to the form known as Len-
zites corrugata. — Craterellus dubius ? I think only little, malformed cornuco-
pioides.— Hydnum caput-ursi — Hirneola auricula-Judae — Hydnum aurantium
— Polyporus rutilans — Thelephora vialis — Thelephora (sp.) — Polystictus fo-
cicola — Hydnum velutinum — Polyporus betulinus — Polyporus gilvus.

SWOPE, DR. EUGENE, Ohio:

Fomes graveolens, beautiful specimen.

WHETSTONE, DR. M. S., Minnesota:

Lenzites betulina — Lenzites saepiaria — Polyporus (cfr. applanatus)
— Polyporus adustus — Reticularia Lycoperdon.

4

LETTER No. 35.

List of specimens received at Kew in May. 1'jll. These specimens were
all sent to my Paris address. No. G3 rue Buffon. ami were forwarded to me
during the latter days of my stay at Kew. Some of them I do not recognize
as to species and had no time to look them up at Kew, ! indi

cated them by a star (*) and will publish them in detail when ih-
determined.

I beg to thank those who continue to aid me by sending specimens for
study. It is only by constantly handling, studying, and comparing tin in thai
the subject can be learned. There is one thing that much simplifi-
work. It develops that the species of fungi are relatively few and that many
common species grow in every country. This nuikes it easier as every pack-
age I receive, no matter from what country, contains species that I recognize
at sight and which require no further study on my part. At the same time
there is scarcely a package received that does not contain something of
special interest. In this letter we record Polyporus Hartmanni from Miss
Flockton, heretofore known only from the collection at Kew; Stephensia
from G. Brown, surely without a specific name I think; Hydmim cinna-
barinum from Dr. Becker, South Africa, which was namerl from the rniied
States, but I do not recall having seen a specimen in any museum and have
never before received it.

I hope those who receive my publications will favor me by sending such
things as they notice (except the soft, fleshy, watery species that change in
drying). It is only from abundant material that much of value can be
learned. The scanty material and knowledge on which many "new si><
are based is the source of a great deal of the trouble and confusion that now
surround the subject.

C. G. LLOYD,
63 rue Buffon,
Paris, France.

CAVARA, FR., Italy:

Polysaccum tuberosum.

PANAU, CHARLES, France:

Daedalea confragosa (trametoid form).

WEIDMANX, ANT., Bohemia:

Polyporus salignus— Polyporus fumosus— Fomes connatus
young— Trametes micans-Fomes nigricans. with black pore mouths, were
probably white at one time. I have seen the plant in Boudiei

UNIVERSITY OFteALIFORNIA

.-AT LOS ANGELES

JAN 2 0 1942

I think it is not exactly the same plant, the usual form having brown mouths,
but it has no distinctive name. — Trametes serialis — Fomes igniarius — Poria??
— Lenzites saepiaria.

NESPOR, MR., Bohemia:

Fomes robustus (on pine=Hartigii) — Polyporus adustus — Trametes
serialis — Fomes robustus, on oak — Lenzites protracta, abnormal, irpicoid
form — Fomes robustus (?), color of context too dark (on oak) — Fomes nigri-
cans, on birch — Fomes nigricans, on willow.

FLOCKTON, MISS MARGARET, Australia:

Polyporus Hartmanni, most interesting, see note 18 — Geaster velu-
tinus— Geaster Reader!— Polystictus cinnabarinus— Scleroderma flaviduin—
Hirneola auricula-Judae — Polyporus ochroleucus— Schizophyllum commune—
Polyporus (probably lilacino-gilvus, young) — Stereum — Clavaria — Lycoperdon
cepaeforme — Fomes, probably unnamed, see note 14 — Rhizopogon* — Poly-
porus Schweinitzii. This does not correspond exactly with the European
plant and may be a distinct form. It has smaller pores and is more firm. —
Thelephora* — Polyporus* — Cyathus stercoreus, probably, no spores found. —
Cyathus stercoreus.

MAIRE, RENE, France:

Fomes robustus (=Hartigii) — Polyporus pubescens, Fr. — Polyporus
chioneus, Fr. (Sense of Bres. Fungi Kmet.) — Polyporus osseus — Polyporus
tomentosus, young* — Trametes hispida — Polyporus griseus — Polyporus velu-
tinus? — Polyporus cristatus (young) — Fomes torulosus (malvenu).

CAVE, G. H., India:

Lenzites repanda, a frequent plant in all tropical countries. —
Trametes Persoonii, an unusual form of a usual species.- — Polyporus licnoides.
Same surface markings and color as the type form from South America
but a thicker plant. — Lycoperdon piriforme. This grew in high altitude,
8,000 feet. — Polystictus sanguineus — Polyporus adustus.

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Polyporus, unknown to me. Surface with ?. thin crust, smooth. Con-
text, deep umber, hard but not ligneous. Pores small, paler than the con-
text, the mouths glancing when fresh. No setae. Spores abundant, 5x8,
smooth, pale colored. Rev. Rick suggests Fomes scalaris and Fomes
Patouillardii. It is not the former and the latter is unknown to me. This
plant, however, is not a Fomes I think.

BROWN, G., New Zealand:

Sphaerobolus stellatus — Calvatia caelata— Rhizopogon* — Stephensia*
(Note 17) — Fuligo septica.

WOOD, J. MEDLEY, Natal: •

Polyporus (Ganoderma) Africanus, undeveloped — Agaric, abnormal,
probably deformed Lentinus.

HUTCHINGS, S., India:
Calvatia Gardneri.

BECKER, DR. H.( Cape Colony:

Panus rudis-Geaster fornicatus. A rare species throughout .he
world, but appearing more common in South Africa.-Geaster min.l^!
Stereum hirsutum-Polyporus gilvus-Polystictus versicolor-Bulgaria*-
leuc°Phaeus- undeveloped)-Hydnum cinnabarinum

UNKNOWN DONOR, India:

This package was forwarded to me from Paris to Kew the original
wrapper having been removed at Paris. I could get no clue to its source
except that the fungi was wrapped in a newspaper published in India.

Daldinea concent rica— Cyathus, spores 12x-Jft-Seliixn|,hyIlmn oommtllW
-Hirneola auricula-Judae— two species of Stereum*— Trametes ochrol.
— Lentinus*— an agaric— Stereum,* beautiful white species (Note 13) —
Guepinia spathulata.

FETCH, T., Ceylon:
Polyporus rubidus.

WOOD, J. MEDLEY, Natal:

Mutinus (or a Jansia) dried phalloid. I should not be surprisfii if
it were Jansia elegans of Java, but can not say with certainty from a dried
specimen.

NOTE 13. An unknown donor of India sends us a beautiful pure white
probably unnamed. ^ e find no such species at Kew. It is light and has in
of a Polystictus than a Stereum. The hymenium is perfectly smooth, however, and showed
no sign of pores. The upper surface is white, strigose.

NOTE 14. A Fomes, probably unnamed, has been received from Miss Margaret
Flockton, Gladesville. N. S. Wales. It is very close to Fomes robustus of Kurope »n.l
has the same bright rhei context. It has globose, hyaline spores. 8-9 and setae are rarely
found on the hymeniuui. (Bobustnj lias smaller spores, G-7 and I have never found sn.v
setae on the hymenium.) Miss Flockton 's plant is the Australian analogue of the European
species.

NOTE 15. Polyporus salignus and Polyporus fumosus. Two specimens just received
from Ant. Weidmaun, Bohemia, illustrate to my mind the difference between salignu* and
fumosus, which I believe to be only forms of one species. Both have the. Kami-
surface and context, which is a slightly isabelline or adustus color. Salignus h.,
of the same color as the context, while in fumosus they are much darker than the ••••
I believe salignus is a rather common plant on willow. Fumosus is much more rar*.
Polyporus fumosus is a plant of very common record, but I think Polyporus adustus is
often mistaken for it.

NOTE 16. A plant of great interest reaches us from Dr. II. It,-, k. r. S,,mh Africa
It is a bright cinnabar red. resupinate Hydnum and 1 think is clouliMt-x Myiinuin cinn»
barinum. This species is supposed to have been named l>y Srhweimt/. fn-m the
States, but it must be very rare for I do not recall ever having neon it in S.-hw.-iniU'»
herbarium or elsewhere. There is no specimen at Kew. It is supposed thsi Hy.lr.inii
lubrum, which Persoon records from Russia, is the same plant. Berkel. y I, as stated
somewhere that Hydnum cinnabarinum is the mycelium of Polytttictus san^uini-im While
it has that general appearance, that is an error if this collection from Dr. H.-.-k.T is cor
rectly named. The hymenoid spines are perfectly formed and flmbriate with, the pro-
jecting deep red hyphae. The spores are small, globose, hyaline, 3-4. The entire plant
and hyphae have the same bright cinnabar red color as that of Polyst

NOTE 17 G Brown, of Christchurch, New Zealand, sends us what is always of
much interest, a tuberaceous plant, although we have never given this family any detailed
studv. It belongs to the genus Stephensia, but as to species we judge it has no name.
The Vridinm is "reddish yellow, smooth. The only species with a yellow peridinm that
we find named is Stephensia rrocea. which has a tomentose pendium. No specie* of the
genus Stephensia is given in the Handbook, from AlMteMMI

XOTK 18. Polvporus llartiiiiiiuii. W,- are particularly clad to fet a specimen of
this plant from Mi»'s Maritar.-t Klo.-kton. (iladesville Austraha •» 11 i» M
sp.vi.'s. only know,, heretofore from til.- orininal >.-n.«inB- :.t K-«

3

species with a soil, veiutmate, Drown sorraee, sott. spongy, white flesh, and rather amall
pores that are white when fresh but turn black with age. The spores which were merely
described as "minute" are elongated, 5x12 mic., hyaline, smooth. The species is
evidently badly figured in the Handbook, as the pileus is not red as shown but is brown.
The species nearest to Polyporus Hartmanni is Polyporus radicatus of the United States.

NOTE 19. Is Fomes graveolens odoriferous ? It has that reputation, in fact was
so named, and elaborate accounts of it have been written under the name of "sweet knot."
It has no odor when dry. I am told by Mr. L. O. Overholts that he has collected it fresh
and growing and could not detect any odor. Let us have the truth about this. I hope
the next one to find this rare species will note particularly if it has an odor. While we
do not question Mr. Overholts' observations, the plant may be odoriferous under certain
conditions and not under others. Also what is the color of its spores? Mr. Murrill
records them as brown and bases a "new genus" on them. 1 have never found them
but think they will be found to be white. At least most species with similar context
have white spores, and the fact that I find no spores in the dried specimens is a sus-
picious one. Most plants with brown spores have them abundantly in the dried specimens.

NOTE 20. Polystictus fimbriatus. This is an abundant plant in Brazil and tropical
America, and has reached Europe a number of times. (ilaziou sent it in quantities. The
hyinenium is rarely if ever perfect, usually only part of the pore walls are developed,
giving it an appearance something like a Radulum, or in a faint degree like a Hydnum.
It has been variously classed as Polyporous, Polystictus, Hydnum, Thelephora, Bec-
cariella and as a matter of strict accuracy it is neither. It has of course a profusion
of specific names to correspond. I confidently expect that Mr. Banker will rise to the
occasion and discover it to be a "new genus." Professor McGinty has already made
the discovery, but in deference to his distinguished co-worker he writes me he will not
announce it "at present.

32434.

A recent count of The Lloyd Library shows there are 32434 volumes on
the shelves. This is the actual number of the covers or volumes. The pam-
phlets are collected, twenty-five to fifty in a cover, and each cover counts as
one volume.

Tin- Lloyd Library is devoted almost exclusively to Botany and Phar-
macy, and one would hardly suppose there had been issued so many books
pertaining to these two subjects. And yet we presume that we have up to
the present time not been able to get more than one-half that have been
published on these subjects.

LETTER No. 36.

BY C. G. LLOYD, CINCINNATI, JUNE, 1911.
THE POLYPOROID TYPES OF LEVEILLE AT LEIDEN.

In the early days the old Dutch botanists made many collections
of fungi in Java and other Dutch colonies in the East. With the ex-
ception of Junghuhn, they were not published by the collectors, but
were vaguely named and preserved in the museum at Leiden. In this
museum are many old collections by Korthals, Blume, Zippelius and
Junghuhn in the East, and Miq-uel in Surinam, but very few of them
have the collector's name stated on the label.

Leveille visited the museum about 1844 and when he went back to
Paris he published forty-five "new species" that he had noted in the
museum at Leiden. He did not endorse his names on any of the labels,
but he cited the collectors, often inaccurately I believe, and the names
or numbers that the specimens bore. I have worked the collection over
and by means of these citations have been able to identify the larger
part of the types. It is possible that another search might produce
others that I have overlooked, but I went carefully into the matter and
believe that very few of those I did not find will ever be found or at
least will ever be identified. In my opinion Leveille did about the
poorest work in naming species of any of the old namers, always ex-
cepting Kalchbrenner. At that time but few foreign species had ba-n
named, but Leveille did not seem to know even these few. In addition
he often based species on very inadequate material, little abortive or
undeveloped specimens that should not have been named at all.
cently all the Javanese specimens have been sent to Bresadola and have
been 'named by him. A number of Leveille's "types" were thus cor-
rectly named, but in the renaming they lost their historical value, if
Leveille's work had any value.

There are five series of numbered boxes at Leiden, about a th
sand altogether. Leveille's "types" are distributed through these boxes,
hence it was considerable labor to hunt them out, especially as they
were not indicated in any particular way.

In the following synopsis I have noted in parentheses the origin
names or numbers cited by Leveille, and which have been my eh.et
in identifying the types. Of course I have also taken Leveill
scriptions" into account to see that the specimens agree. <>r at I
not too strongly disagree. I have indicated in each case the box m
so that it will be an easier task for the next man, if any one^els
thinks it is worth the trouble to hunt out Level le is types

abnormis (Sist, No. 33). Type not found but i
remarks it was probably the common Polysti

TOOVEfcTIT OFfcALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES

albo-marginatus (Zipp. Mss.) Type in Box 51. It is the common
Fomes, or perhaps Polyporus, with brick red context which occurs in
the Hast and is better known and better called Fomes Kermes as Berke-
ley named it. The white margin may have been "remarquable" at
one time, but it is chiefly remarkable now by its total absence, as it
is in all of the many specimens of this species that I have seen. To
call the plant albomarginatus is a case of following priority back to
absurdity.

anisopilus (pubescens, Fr.). Type in Box 5.* It is found in
Saccardo as Fomes (sic) and it is a thin Polystictus. It is rigid, ses-
sile, has gilvus context and medium rigid pores. It has been renamed
"Trametes fuscella, Lev." It has no setae and is not a form of gilvus.

aulaxina (lacerus) as Daedalea. Type in Box 3.* It is a little
fragment of a broad-gilled Lenzites, probably "Platyphylla, Lev." as
now named.

acuta (Kor. No. 29) as Trametes. Type not found.

atypus (Pol. No. 30). Type not found. There are two collections
with this number but neither can possibly be the collection named.

auriculaeformis (Jungh. Mss.). Type in box No. 77, not Jung-
huhn's writing, however. It is a single specimen, undoubtedly abnor-
mally developed. It has the same context color and setae as Poly-
porus gilvus and may be an abnormal growth of this species.

Biumei (Magamedon). Type in Box 112. It is a thin, glabrous
Polystictus with shallow pores, which seems frequent in Java. There
are several collections' at Leiden, but in other museums this species
is usually represented only by Zollinger, Coll. No. n.

Blumei (viviparus) as Hexagona. Type in Box 183. In my
opinion it is a thin, proliferous form of Hexagona tennis.

cinerascens (Pol. No. 82). No type found by me. Specimens
in Box 182. So named now and evidently taken as the type, but 1
think does not agree with the description nor can any connection be
drawn from the old labeling.

confertus (fumosus, Jungh.). Tvpe in Box 29. I think it is a
good species. Zoll. 2d Coll. No. 44 is supposed to be the same thing
and better specimens. It is a thin Polystictus with gilvus context and
glabrous, rugulose surface. It has no setae.

convolutus (Zipp. Mss.). Type in Box 169. I should refer it
to a subproliferous or lacerated form of Polystictus Blumei.

dilatatus (Pol. sector?). Type in Box 178. It is now correctly
referred to "Polystictus Blumei, Lev." and it is surely the same plant.

flavida, Daedalea (Korthals). Type not found, but compare
lurida.

Hasseltii (mollis, van Hasselt). Tyne not found by me.

Haskarlii (ferrugineus, Jungh.). Types are in boxes 213* and
249, although labeled "ferruginosus" and probably not from Junghuhn.
It is a common ferruginous Fomes in the East with abundant setae
and is what I have heretofore been informed is Fomes Korthalsii.
Leveille's measurements "4-5 cent." should be I think decimeters.
This is evidently Fomes Korthalsii in the sense of Leveille's sub-

sequent publications and of the Zollinger collection, 872, named by
Leveille, but not the original.

Junghuhnii (Daed. betulina, Jungh.) Lenzites. Type in it found.

Junghuhnii (Ins. Bantam) Favolus. Type in Box 209. Thi^ i>
a marked species and I think is the only specimen in any museum. It i>
a large species with the upper surface strongly "granular-squama!
arranged in lines. The only similar species I have noted is Polyporus
fuscolineatus (Type in Brit. Mus.).

Korthalsii (Korth. No. 30). The type cited is in Box 23* and has
recently been labeled "Polyporus sideroides, Lev. form ap.xla." I
think that is correct although it is a plant of quite different appearance
from the type of Polyporus sideroides. Both have the same context
and abundant, globose, colored spores, 8-9 mic. (Compare I'olyporu.s
sideroides.) I believe that Leveille had Haskarlii confused with Kor-
thalsii in his later publications and in his naming at Paris and in Zoll.
Coll. 872.

leptopilus (Pol. No. 3). Type not found.

lurida (No. 27) as Daedalea. The type in Box 143 is now labeled
"Daedalea flavida, Lev.=Pol. lenziteus, Lev." I think that is correct,
also it is in my opinion ochroleuca, Lev., Hobsonii, Berk, and many
other names.

Molkenboeri (macrotrema, Jungh.) as Hexagona. Type in !Vr-
soon's Box 42. This was an unauthorized change of Junghuhn's name
to which Junghuhn naturally objected. (Cfr. Hex. Synopsis, p. 30
also Letter No. 37.

microcyclus (Zipp. Mss.) Type in Box i^l'olystictus tabacinns
of Montagne.

multiplex, Favolus (Pol. c'ristatus). Type in Box 5*.
very much if the American specimens usually referred to Favolus
multiplex in the museums are correctly referred.

murinus (Korthals) as Lenzites. Type in Box 242.
to betulinus now but I think is a good species. The gills are n
the nature of those of Lenzites repanda. The surface is very n
tomentose, zoned. The context is isabelline.

murinus ( versicolor, Zipp.) No type found by me.
in Box 137 so labeled now seem to answer Leveille s descnpti.
were ori-inaly labeled "Pol. eximius" which Leveille referred to
porus detonsus. They are surely the same as bruneoli

3.t K^CW

notopus (proboscideiis, Jungh.) No type found b>
There is a specimen so named by Leve.lle at Pans, but ,
and scanty to serve any purpose.

Pala (Herb. Miquel). Type not found.

peltatus (Fav. No. 4) « Favolus. Not foundry

There

are a numoer of' £K« l-y l»n,h,,.,n ,.f I'olys.ic.us sansn

3

but they are all correct and none are "50 cm." in diameter. Leveille's
.description would point to Polystictus Persoonii though "pores minu-
tissimus" hardly agrees.

plicatus (Blume Mss.). Type not found.

perpusillus (Pers. Mss.). I saw this collection on a previous trip
to Leiden but did not look it up this time. It is in Persoon's herbarium.
It is a little Fomes but there is nothing to indicate that it came from
"America boreali" as Leveille states, and to my knowledge it is not an
American species.

pulchella (Boletus apus Kuhl.) as Hexagona. Type not found
at Leiden. There is a specimen labeled by Leveille in Patouillard's
herbarium (Cfr. Hex. synopsis, p. 25) but it does not agree with
his description which was "zonis castaneis." In the original sense it
seems to be a common species in the East and in Africa, marked with
a dark red stain, and is called in my pamphlet Hexagona discopoda,
and is probably the same as tricolor of Fries.

pusillus (Pers. Mss.). Type in Persoon's herbarium. It is the
frequent little species of the tropics, well known under Berkeley's name
Polyporus Rhipidium. (Cfr. Pol. Issue p. 33.)

rhodophaeus (Rosa mala, Jungh.) Type in Box 171 has been re-
cently referred to semilaccatus of Berkeley.

rigidus (Pol. No. 100). Type, not found.

rugulosus (monochrous, Mont.? Pol. No. 57). Type not found
by me though I think it must be in some box as there is an index sheet
in the covers. This name has been lately taken as referring to the same
plant as Polyporus zonalis of Berkeley.

sideroides (Pol. No. 24 & 101, KortlO Type No. 24 is in Box 95.
It is the most noteworthy species that Leveille named. In general
appearance it reminds me of Polyporus Schweinitzii. It has a pleuro-
podal, thick, spongy, tomentose stipe. The context is ferruginous and
the abundant spores are colored, globose, 8-9 mic. Polyporus Kor-
thalsii in the original sense of Leveille is probably a sessile form of
the same species. The only specimen I had previously seen of Poly-
porus sideroides is at Kew, named by Leveille, and this has a short,
lateral stipe. The best specimen of this species at Leiden is in Box 237.

splendens (sericeus v. nitidus). Type in Box 132.* It is the
common Polystictus pergamenus.

splendens (Herb. Miq.) as Daedalea. Type not found and prob-
ably could not be identified if it were.

tener (Sumatra, Korthals) as Favolus. Type not found.

tenuissimus (Pol. No. 4). Type not found.

trachodes (tuberculosus, Jungh.) Type in Box 34. It is now
labeled correctly, Polyporus scruposus which is a form of Polyporus
gilvus.

vittata (Korthals) Trametes. Type not found.

LETTER No. 37.

BY C. G. LLOYD, CINCINNATI, JUNE, 1911.
THE POLYPOROID TYPES OF JUNGHUHN PRESERVED AT LEIDEN.

Junghuhn was among the first to name foreign species of fungi.
He made large collections in Java and published a paper that was finely
illustrated, in 1839. If all of his types were destroyed many of bii
cies would still live, for he gave good accounts of them and good figures
of many of them. All of the figures that he 'cites were not published
as it was his intention to continue the work, and he numbered his
paper "Fasc. i ," but no further papers were issued by him on the sub-
ject. Dr. Goethart assures me that the originals of Junghuhn's figures
are not preserved in the museum at Leiden.

However, there are at Leiden colored drawings of a large munl>er
of Javanese fungi, and they are the best I have ever seen of tropical
fungi. The name of the author of these icones has been lost, but I
think I have found evidence to trace them to Zippelius. Most of them
are named as new species and it was evidently the intention to publish
them, and it is unfortunate that they were not published as they were
mostly "new species" at that time. Many of them have been named
since. I hope to have more to say as to these icones in a future letter.

Junghuhn's specimens are mostly preserved, and of the thirty-
three species that he named I found the types of twenty-seven. The
remaining six have probably been misplaced in covers where they do
not belong, or his labels for the specimens have been lost. Tli-
no trouble in identifying Junghuhn's types for he labeled each in his
peculiar writing.

For many years under the old directors the mycological specimens
were neglected in the museum at Leiden, and many specimens were
loose in drawers or put away in packages. When I first visited the
museum it was not possible to work with any excepting those that
were in the herbarium covers. A few years ago Dr. Jongmans had
the loose specimens all placed in boxes and numbered and the number
that I cite refers to these boxes.

When Junghuhn wrote on fungi several of the Polyporoid genera
had not acquired Definite me;inii|gOfi(t;j|BIPOJHftWs occurrence per-
AT LOS&HGELSS

JAN 2 0 1942

M. I— > XX

haps that of the six species of Favolus, Daedalea, Laschia and Mer-
ulius that Junghuhn named, not one of them would to-day be placed
in the genus where Junghuhn placed them. I will give here a short
summary of the types of Junghuhn that I have been able to locate
and the box or cover where they may be found. It was quite a task
to hunt them out among the several hundred boxes of fungi from Java
now in the museum. Junghuhn 's types have a value that many of
them do not possess, for while Berkeley, Montagne, Fries, Leveille
and many of the old namers of -fungi distributed co-types to other
museums, I have never noted any of Junghuhn's specimens except at
Leiden.

affinis (as Merulius). Type in Hirneola cover. It is Hirneola
delica which Avas originally published by Fries as Laschia delica.

annulatus. Type not found by me, but Junghuhn gave such a
good illustration that there is no question as to the species. I collected
it in Samoa.

asper. Good types in Polyporus cover. Good specimens also
in Zollinger's set No. 2080. It is a Trametes, in the same section as
Trametes hydnoides.

bicolor. Type in cover, also several collections in boxes. It
seems to be a frequent plant in the East, marked with a brown spot
that appears at the base of the pileus. Berkeley called it Poyporous
anebus, and Murrill discovered only recently that it was a "new
species."

byssogena. Type in Box 107.* It is large pored, white Poria.
It was published as byssogena but Junghuhn labeled his specimen
byssoseda.

cervino-gilvus. Type in cover. Beautifully illustrated by Jung-
huhn. Unfortunately it is the same as dermatodes which I believe
is prior.

cucullata (as Merulius). Type in Laschia cover. This is a little
Laschia, as some now class it, with a' venose hymenium exactly as
shown in the unpublished Icones No. 37 and named "Polyphleps
chloroleucus," unquestionably I think the same species.

Crustacea (as Laschia). Type in Box 6.* When Junghuhn pub-
lished Laschia as a new genus he was not aware that Fries had used
the same name as a fungus genus. Of the two species that Junghuhn in-
cludes, the first ( Crustacea) is a Poria and the second (spathulata) is a
Favolus. Leveille stated that there were no grounds for basing a genus
on Laschia Crustacea and on his statement the species was compiled
in Saccardo as Poria Crustacea (Vol. 6, p. 333). Montagne and Berke-

ley took the genus Laschia to apply to the resupinate species with
long, superficial pores, and as the name Laschia was preoccupied, it
was changed to Hymenogramme and Laschia Crustacea is also entered
in Saccardo (Vol. 5, p. 652) under the genus Hymenogramme.
Whether the genus Hymenogramme in the sense of Berkeley and
Montagne can be maintained or not is another question, but I think
this species at any rate should go in Poria.

durus. Type in cover, also in Box 114.* This is quite a distinct
species with dark, atropurpureus context. It was named also carti-
lagineus (type at Kew) and Testudo (type at British Museum ) by
Berkeley.

flavus. Types in Boxes 82* and 109.* A common species in
the tropics. For me it is a Polystictius, which Junghuhn beautifully
figured and I think he should be given the credit for the species. As
I have published I doubt if it is the same, as has been stated, as Irpex
flavus of Klotzsch which was from the arctic regions.

floccosus. Type in cover and in Box 35.* This is the Eastern
analogue of the American plant called Polystictus rigens. It has the
same context and pores but the surface is different.

fusco-albus (changed to Junghuhnii because it is a duplicate
name). I did not find the type.

furcatus. No type found by me.

indecorus. Type in Polyporus cover. It is a Trametes form of
Polystictus Persoonii.

indica (Daedalea). Type in Box 117. It is in very bad con-
dition, eaten by insects, but I think is the common Lenzites repanda
of the tropics which has so many other names.

lacerus (Why changed to lacer in Saccardo?). Type in cover
also in Box 77.* It was published as lacevus but Junghuhn vvn.tr
his label lacerus which no doubt was as intended. The plant is the
same as dilatatus (bis) of Berkeley, which Cooke changed to Adami.

macrotrema. The type is (in error) in Persoon's Box
The name was changed, without Junghuhn's consent or authority, t
Molkenboeri by Leveille. (Cfr. Syn. Hexagonas, p. 30)
white Hexagona.

microscopicus. No type found by me.

miniatus. Type in cover. Also a figure in the unpub
In my opinion it is a thin form of Polyporous sulphureus.

Mons veneris. Type in Box 176.* It is the same spcc.es as
leoninus as named by Klotzsch, better known as funahs, a quit
mon species in the East.

3

•niveus. Type in Polyporus cover. It is undeterminable, a white,
Poria or more probably the resupinate portion of some Polyporus.

obovatus. Only a small fragment remains of the type in Box
20.* I judge it is the same plant as rasipes of Berkeley and very
close to laceratus but not the same.

pellucida. Type in Box 21. I believe this is a rare species. The
hymenium is rose color and is pubescent under a lens. The micro-
scope shows the slender hairs hyaline and slightly incrusted. The
pores are large and shallow. For me it is a Polystictus in the same
section as dermatodes. It does not appear to me to be pellucid.

pustulosus (as Favolus). No types found by me and the figure
cited was not published. From the description it is evidently a Laschia
and probably the same as Holtermann figured as Laschia javanicus.
I think Hennings has also named it. In the sense of Leveille (speci-
men in Patouillard's herbarium) it is Hexagona Miquelii, but Leveille
got a great many things wrong.

punctatus. No type found.

roseo-alba. Type in Box n.* A subresupinate Polyporus or per-
haps a Fomes, most probably the same as carneus in the original sense
of Nees. I think it is quite different from the plant we have in the
United States which we know as Polyporus (or Fomes) carneus,
rarely forgetting to add the "Nees" though there exists not the slightest
evidence that our American plant ever grew in Java.

spadiceus. Type in cover, also in Box 49*=Polystictus tabacinus.
The figure that Junghuhn gave appears smooth but the plant is densely
tomentose. The shape is also unusual as the plant is usually dimidiate.

spathulatus (as Laschia). Type in Box 127.* It is a Favolus.
The types are in very poor condition.

tropicus. Type in Box 170.* It is a Polyporus (not a Fomes
I think) belonging to the section Ganodermma. The spores, which are
typically those of this section, are distinctly rough.

umbilicatus. Type in Polyporus cover. It has been stated by Fries (
to be the same as arcularius and it so appears to me.

venulosus. Type in cover. I think it is a good species of Poly-
stictus. Dimidiate, thin, white, with a glabrous but rugulose surface.
Context white. Pores small.

LETTER No. 38.

List of specimens received from correspondents since my last report.
There has been some delay in getting out this list, owing to the fact that
for the greater part of last summer I was in Germany out of touch with
my home office. They have all been promptly advised, however, by letter
regarding the determinations as soon as the specimens came into my hands.

I beg to thank those who kindly sent me specimens, for I feel that it is
only by familiarity with the plants as they occur in the various countries
that a knowledge of the same can be obtained. While one can get the names
of a great many species from the named specimens that are in the museums
the species can not be learned from this source. Very often the specimen
on which the name is based is so poor that it would not be recognized
until the species is learned.

C. G. LLOYD,

63 rue Buffon,

December, 1911. Pans, France.

AIKEN, W. H., Ohio:

Stereum complicatum (young) — Calvatia rubroflava — Polystictus

hirsutulus.

BARKER, W. E., New Zealand:

Daldinia concentrica — Polystictus versicolor — Fomes australis (not
developed) — Mycenastrum Corium — Hirneola auricula Judae. This is
called "Taranaki Wool," as when Taranaki was first settled the collection
and shipment to China was an important industry, and it is stated that
from this one district it has been exported to the value of more than
$700,000. Cfr. Myc. Notes, p. 495— Peziza aeruginosum— Peziza citrinum—
Polystictus hirsutus, a thick trametoid form — Aseroe Hookeri with a long
stem. — Anthrus aseroeformis. "This was very common this year. It grows
not in the bush, but in fields, and its quaint, long, red arms make it very
conspicuous." W. E. Barker — Cyathus vernicosus — Schizophyllum commune.

BEARDSLEE, PROF. H. C., North Carolina:

Thelephora cuticularis— Thelephora terrestris (?) — Thelephora
multipartita — Hydnum graveolens — Polystictus fOcicola — "Thelephora" Cla-
donia— Xylaria tentaculata (cfr. Note 10)— Stereum rubiginosum— Poly-
porus Spraguei— Polyporus hispidus— Thelephora vialis— Thelephora p*l-

1

OF CALIFORNIA

AT LOS ANGELES
IAN 9. 0

mata (depauperate form?) — Thelephora albido-brunnea — Polyporus cro-
ceus — Merulius incarnatus — Thelephora palmata — Fistulina pallida (rarely
received by me) — Polystictus biformis — Cordyceps militaris. An abun-
• dant collection showing various forms that the plant takes. Several "new
species" might be made from this collection.

BESSEY, DR. E. A., Michigan:
Tylostoma campestris.

BIERS, PAUL, France:
Fomes torulosus.

BLANDENIER, A., Egypt:

Ganodermus not developed and not determinate as to species. I
know no species, however, with such narrow, concentric, context zones.

BRAENDLE, FRED. J., Washington, D. C.:

Polyporus distortus "common on our city flats."

BRA UN, LUCY, Ohio:

A set of local Myxomycetes collected and determined by Miss Lucy
Braun. These specimens will be of value to future workers in the Myxomy-
cetes in the vicinity of Cincinnati. All the determinations are made, I
judge, from Macbride's publication.

Fuligo violacea — Physarum atrum — Physarum flavicomum — Physarum
leucopus — Physarum nefroideum — Physarum pulcherrimum — Physarum Ra-
venelii — Physarum sp. — Diderma crustaceum — Diderma floriforme — Lepi-
doderma tigrinum— Stemonitis carolinensis— Stemonitis fusca — Stemonitis
Smithii — Stemonitis Webberi — Comatricha Stemonitis — Cribraria tenella —
Cribraria violacea — Dictydium cancellatum — Arcyria cinerea — Arcyria de-
nudata — Arcyria digitata — Arcyria incarnata — Hemitrichia Serpula — Hemi-
trichia stipitata — Hemitrichia vesparium — Trichia favoginea — Trichia per-
similis — Trichia varia — and ten undetermined species.

BROWN, GEO., New Zealand:

Clathrus cibarius, young, eggs — Tylostoma. This species does not
seem to be covered in my monograph, but I must make a comparative study
before deciding. It is close to Tylostoma granulosum of Europe, but the
spores are nearly smooth.

BURCHARD, DR. O., Canary Islands:
Polyporus (Ganoderma) resinaceus.

CARNE, W. M., N. S. Wales:

Fomes applanatus — Hexagona similis — Schizophyllum commune —
Polystictus cinnabarinus — Fomes rimosus. This specimen has a smooth,
black crust and not the usual rimose crust from which it was named. Still,
with the same context, color, spores, and other characters, I take it to be
the same species.

CASTILLON, LEON,

p.)-Polyporus (or Femes )-Polystictus
CAVANAGH, B. S., India:

Polyporus lucidus. This form has a short, obese stem and the
spores are slightly more rough than the type form in Europe, but in Tu

essentials it is the same plant.

CHADWICK, WM., Jamaica:

Polyporus albellus— Polystictus sanguineus.

CHEESEMAN, W. N., England:
Polyporus adustus.

COMPTON, JAMES S., Illinois:

Xylaria polymorpha— Lycogala Epidendrum— Arcyria punicea.

DAVIS, SIMON, Massachusetts:

Lenzites confragosa, with a curious malformation growth— Cordy-
ceps militaris— Polyporus brumalis, a black and a brown specimen— Polyp-
orus betulinus, abnormal— Polyporus albellus— Fomes leucophaeus— Cordy-
ceps militaris.

DEARNESS, JOHN, Ontario:

Calvatia saccatus, as I believe, although I did not know that the
species grew in America — Lycoperdon umbrinum — Lycoperdon atropurpu-
reum — Thelephora terrestris — Fomes conchatus — Polystictus biformia —
Polyporus melanopus, rarely received by me — Polystictus pergamenus —
Xylaria filiformis. A rare plant— Hydnum septentrionale.

DUPRET, H., Canada:

Irpex cinnamomeus — Trametes saepiaria.

DUTRA, DR. JOAO, Brazil:

Polystictus sanguineus — Polyporus gilvus — Fomes fasciatus — Fo-
mes. Unnamed, I think. It has white context, pinkish pores, and distinct,
hyaline cystidia. It is close to connatus, also Auberianus.

EVANS, I. B. POLE, South Africa:

Geaster saccatus — Geaster pectinatus — Calvatia olivacea (?) —
Lycoperdon cepaeforme, form with elliptical spores tending toward "oblongi-
sporus" — Scleroderma Cepa — Scleroderma tenerum — Scleroderma (imma-
ture) — Cyathus dasypus (probably) — Cyathus (cfr. vernicosus). Spores
same (7 x.12), but differs in small conical cups, also habitat — Polyporus
rufescens. Exactly the same as grows in Europe and typically as illus-
trated by Sowerby. — Fomes applanatus — Polyporus (cfr. chioneus) — Polys-
tictus occidental— Polystictus sanguineus— Lenzites repanda.

3

EYRE, REV. W., England:
Fomes applanatus.

FISHER, G. CLYDE, Maryland:

Polyporus sulphureus — Thelephora Schweinitzii — Hydnum laevig-
atum — Hydnum zonatum. Much more slender than the usual plant so
referred, but in this respect closer to the "type" figures. — Stereum compli-
catum (? abnormal). — Polyporus lucidus, with all the essential characters
of this common species, it has yellow pore mouths, hence is a "new species,"
if one so wishes to call it. — Daedalea quercina — Polyporus frondosus (sub-
simple form). — Stereum spadiceum — Poria tulipifera — Stereum complicatum
— Daedalea confragosa — Lenzites protracta — Polystictus versicolor — Ster-
eum sericeum — Lenzites saepiaria, trametoid form — Lenzites betulina — Fomes
graveolens, young — Calvatia lilacina — Polysaccum pisocarpium — Scleroderma
Geaster — Cyathus stercoreus — Polyporus Schweinitzii — Lycoperdon cruci-
atum — Lycoperdon gemmatum — Daedalea unicolor — Nidularia pisiformis,
rarely received by me — Scleroderma tenerum — Polyporus albellus — Dne-
dalea confragosa — Hydnum ferrugineum.

FORBES, C. N., Hawaii:

Fomes australis — Fomes autralis, young — Stereum ochraceo-fla-
vum — Schizophyllum commune (form umber) — Fomes senex, agrees with
original form Juan Fernandez in Herb. Montagne. In the sense of Berkeley
and others it is quite a different plant. — Polyporus zonalis — Fomes. Species
unknown to me. Also four Pyrenomycetes, a family I do not study. They
have been sent to H. C. Hawley for determination.

GILLET, REV. J., Congo, Beige.:

Polyporus sacer. A well known species of Africa with a sclerotium.
I am most glad to receive these specimens, as they are the first I have
gotten. — Hard black balls, their nature even unknown to me. At first I
took them for hypogeal fungi, but I find in their tissue no spores or other
clue to their nature.

GRIFFITHS, D., collected at Chico, Cal.:
Gyrophragmium decipiens.

GRIFFIN, D. B., Vermont:

Clitopilus abortivus — Polyporus Peckii. A rare plant, and Mr.
Griffin is about the only one of my correspondents who finds it. — Fomes
pinicola.

HAMILTON, A. G., New South Wales:

Catastoma anomala — Polysaccum pisocarpium — Fomes robustus.
On Eucalyptus. This has all the characters of the European species which
there grows usually on oak. — Stereum (Sp.) — Polyporus (Sp.) — Bovistella
bovistoides — Geaster saccatus — Scleroderma flavidum — Bovistella australi-
ana — Also fine photograph of Jansia truncata and Aseroe Hookeri, which
will be reproduced in Myc. Notes.

4

HEMPEL, A., Brazil:

Fomes igniarius ? ?-Lenzites striatus-Polyporus unknown to
me-Aunculana polytricha-Stereum lobatum - Geaster (unopen™)-
Schizophyllum commune— Polyporus gilvus.

HORNELL, J., Palni Hills (7,000 ft.), India:

Daldinia concentrica-Hirneola auricula-Judae-Polystictus per-
gamenus— Polyporus adustus-Fomes australis-Schizophyllum commune-
Polystictus versicolor, beautiful colored form-Polystictus hirsutulus-Alsc
a Polystictus and Polyporus not recognized by me.

HUMPHREY, C. G., Wisconsin:

Polyporus albellus ( ?)— Hymenochaete Curtisii— Polystictus abie-
tmus— Lycoperdon piriforme— Lycoperdon gemmatum— Pompoms adustus
—Polystictus pergamenus— Polystictus hirsutus— Stereum spadiceum—
Coniophora (Sp.) — Daedalea unicolor — Merulius tremellosus.

IRANI, J. H., India:

Polyporus (Ganodermus) colossus. This species, originally from
tropical America, is far more common in Africa. This is the first collection
from India— Fungus' (?) indeterminable.

JONES, KATE A., New Hampshire:

Polystictus cinnabarinus — Polystictus perennis — Polystictus Grayii

( ?). This is slightly different from the usual form. — Crucibulum vulgare

Lycogala Epidendrum — Favolus europaeus — Lenzites saepiaria. Mesopodial
form which I do not recall seeing before. — Polystictus versicolor — Polystictus
pergamenus — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Pleurotus nidulans — Favolus euro-
paeus— Lenzites betulinus — Daedalea unicolor — Lenzites saepiaria — Polypo-
rus elegans — Polyporus brumalis — Lycoperdon compressum— Marasmius
rotula — Polystictus versicolor.

KONINGSBERGER, DR. J. C., Java:

My best thanks are extended to Dr. J. C. Koningsberger, Director
of the Botanic Gardens of Buitenzorg, for shipping me a large box of
Java specimens. I am particularly interested in Java specimens, as most
of the historic material from the Dutch East Indies is preserved at Leiden,
and I recently spent three weeks at Leiden in a careful study of it The
species sent by Dr. Koningsberger are relatively few, but the collections
were ample, and one good, ample collection is worth more in learning the
characters of a species than a dozen little fragments of different species
such as I often receive. The following were the Polyporoids of the col-
lection. A few other specimens were included in families I have not
studied as to foreign species.

Ganodermus "fasciatus" (bis) with characteristic spores. It has a hard
(not laccate) crust, ungulate in shape, yellowish pore mouths, and little
context development. I should call it a form of Fomes australis. It is
Fomes fasciatus in the sense of Loveille and Patouillard, though as it was
only a misdetermination of Leveille I think the name has no validity as
applied to this plant.— Polyporus bicolor, characterized by the reddish stain

5

that comes on top of the pileus. Spores globose large, 10 mic. hyaline
smooth. — Ganodermus fasciatus (bis.) Same as previously mentioned, only
these specimens have much development of the context. — Fomes leuco-
phaeus. It is curious that this species, very common and generally sessile in
the United States, in Java often develops an abortive or fictitious stipe.
Some of these specimens are sessile, others pseudo-stipitate. — Ganodermus
cochlear in the sense of Bresadola's naming at Leiden. I shall accept the
name for it, being the only one I have noted, though I do not believe it
exactly corresponds to the original figure, which showed a differently
marked stipe. It seems to be frequent in Java, and several collections are
at Leiden, but not found in any other museum or from any other country. —
Stereum princeps. A large thick Stereum common in Java and the East
in general. Many collections are at Leiden and Kew, the latter under other
names. It ^as named and illustrated by Junghuhn from Java. — Fomes
Haskarlii. Agreeing with the types in boxes 213 and 249 at Leiden
(=Fomes Korthalsii in sense of Bresadola, not original of Leveille.) A very
common species in Java, close if not same as Fomes senex in original sense
from Chili. — Polystictus affinis as originally named and illustrated by Nees
from Java. — Polystictus xanthopus very close to affinis (except mesopodial)
and these collections darker in color than the usual African collections. It
is very common in Africa. — Trametes Persoonii. These specimens have
partly lost the characteristic red coloring surface of the pileus. — Polystictus
versicolor, slightly different from the common temperate region forms. —
Polystictus Blumei. Very close to Polystictus pergamenus, but these have
white pores and glabrous pileus. I think it is better referred as a form
of pergamenus, but this seems to be the common form in Java. — Polyporus
lignosus. A most common species in the tropical world and said to be a
destructive parasite of the rubber tree. It is the plant referred to in
Fetch's writings under the (erroneous) name of Fomes semitostus. Syn-
onym is Fomes Kamphoeveneri Fr., which name is used by Bresadola.

KREKE, REV. MARCUS, Ohio:

Geaster pectinatus — Polyporus rufescens. Unusual form with well
developed pilei, but a portion taking the form of Polyporus distortus and
showing, as I have published, that distortus in only the American abortive
form of rufescens — Polyporus rufescens, pileate, normal. Spores very
abundant 4-5 x 6-8 hyaline, each guttulate — Geaster saccatus — Daedalea
confragosa.

KUYPER, DR. J., Surinam:

Polystictus sanguineus — Schizophyllum commune — Hirneola auric-
ula-Judae — Polyporus lignosus — Cladoderris dendritica. Fine specimens of
a very peculiar genus.

LANGTON, THOS., Canada:

Stereum purpurem — Cantharellus floccosus — Physalacria inflata, a
rare plant. — Polyporus resinosus ( ? or benzoinus) — Merulius aureum (true,
in my opinion). — Stereum rufum — Polystictus circinatus — Fomes connatus
— Lenzites saepiaria — Lenzites protracta — Pleurotus dryinus? (so named)
— Stereum tabacinum.

LANGTON, THOS., from Trinidad:

Lenzites repanda-Favolus braziliensis with abnormal pores-
Lentinus villosus-Polystictus sanguineus-Polystictus caperatus-Gano-
dermus unknown to me— Fomes species unknown to me.

LANTIS, VERNON, Ohio:
Polyporus resinosus.

LLOYD, JOHN URI, Ohio:
Calvatia rubroflava.

Me ALPINE, D., Australia:

Anthurus aseroeformis, dried. This specimen has arms such as
shown in the photograph published (Synopsis Phalloids fig. 46), but the
tubular portion (if it is entire) is much shorter than there shown.

MATTIROLO, PROF., Italy:

Polyporus tuberaster. Prof. Mattirolo also sends a fine photograph
of the plant and interesting notes on the cultivation of the plant for food
in Italy — Polyporus tuberaster. Mycelial mass which is said to produce the
fungus, as mushroom spawn is employed in this country.

MILLER, R., Des Moines, Iowa:

Geaster saccatus — Polystictus cinnabarinus — Lycoperdon gemma-
turn — Polyporus albellus? — Lycoperdon pisiforme — Panus rudis— Trametes
hispida — Fomes leucophaeus.

MOUSSET, J. P., Java:

Trametes Persoonii, also young specimens showing that the "red"
coloration is a later development. — Polyporus (or Fomes) lignosus, and
various forms thick, thin, 'and resupinate — Fomes australis — Polystictus
affinis — Polystictus hirsutus ? — Hirneola auricula-Judac — Auricularia deli-
cata — Polyporus rubidus — Lenzites nivea — Lenzites repanda — Polyporus
vinosus — Polystictus xanthopus — Trametes obstinatus? Context white —
Polystictus luteus— Lenzites betulina— Polystictus occidental— Polystictus
sanguineus — Polystictus dermatodes — Polystictus vemicipes — Polyporus
grammocephalus — Also four species of which I do not recall the name but
will report later. Also two Stereums, two Lentinus, and two Xylari:i.<.

NELSON, N. L. T., Iowa:

Polyporus adustus — Lycoperdon piriforme — Trametes hispida —
Trametes protracta — Polyporus gilvus (unusual form) — Daedalea confragosa
— Secotium acuminatum— Polyporus lucidus (from Michigan)— Stereum
spadiceum.

NEWBERRY, W. J., Natal, South Africa:

Polystictus sanguineus— Polystictus versicolor— Lenzites repanda—
And five species that require further study and three species of Stereum.

7

NOBLE, MRS. M. A., Florida.

Lentinus villosus — Scleroderma Cepa — Scleroderma (cfr. Geaster)
— Bovistella Ohiensis — Geaster hygrometricus (unopened) — Polystictus foci-
cola (unusually large specimen) — Polystictus floridanus.

OVERHOLTS, L. 0., Ohio:

Stereum diaphanum. The nicest collection of this rare species I
have ever gotten. — Mucronella calva. Same I think as I have collected in
Sweden. — Daedalea unicolor — Polystictus biformis — Boletinus porosus —
Polyporus Spraguei — Polyporus cuticularis — Fomes fraxinophilus — Poly-
porus gilvus — Polyporus distortus — Merulius incarnatus — Fomes leuco-
phaeus — Polyporus dichrous — And others.

PARISH, S. B., California:

Trametes hispida (typical) — Trametes. Close to hispida, but pure
white and not so strongly pubescent. It is surely only a variety, but merits
a special name.

PECKOLT, GUSTAVE, Brazil:

Lentinus velutinus — Hexagona variegata, old and effete.

PEPPER, C. W., Rhode Island:

Trametes hydnoides (from West Indies).

RICK, REV. J., Brazil:

Polystictus caperatus — Fomes fasciatus — Also about twenty other
collections, Polystictus, etc., the most of which I am unable to name here
at present.

ROPES, WILLIS H., Massachusetts:
Lycoperdon gemmatum.

RYAN, H. VAL., India:

Stereum versicolor. This appears to me exactly the same plant
that we have so common in the United States, there known as Stereum
versicolor or Stereum fasciatum. In the tropics it takes more luxuriant
forms and is there called Stereum lobatum. All are virtually the same, I
think. — Daldinia concentrica — - Polystictus pergamenus — Fomes nigro-
laccatus — Fomes applanatus. This accords more closely to the type form in
Europe rather than to the usual tropical form (Fomes australis) as one would
naturally expect. — Polyporus (cfr. gilvus). This has the structure of P,
gilvus, but is a thick, imbricate, sulcate form. It probably has names as a
"Fomes," as many tropical forms of gilvus have. — Polyporus picipes. This
is the same thin, black form of P. varius we have in the United States —
Genus unknown to me, but an abnormal growth caused by a microscopic
species. — Fomes senex. True, I think, not in the usual sense. — Fomes. Re-
lated to ulmarius of Europe.

SCARFE, W. A., Caversham, New Zealand:

Secotium erythrocephalum — Cyttaria Gunnii.

SCHUMO, S. L., from Florida-

SMITH, G. D., Kentucky:
Sparassis spathulatus.

STEVENS, F. L., North Carolina:
Scleroderma Geaster.

STIRLING, EDWARD C., Australia:

Fomes rimosus, a fine specimen from Eucalyptus.

TATE, J. M., Iowa:

Daedalea unicolor— Polyporus adustus— Polystictus vereicolor—
Schizophyllum commune— Stereum fasciatum (mesopodial form)— Lycopcr-
don piriforme— Daedalea unicolor— Fomes leucophaeus very young— Poly-
stictus hirsutus— Polyporus adustus— Stereum spadiceum.

THORNQROFT, GEO., Transvaal, South Africa:
Schizophyllum commune.

UMEMURA, JINTARO, Japan:

Geaster hygrometricus — Polystictus ver?icolor — Polystictus verai-
color, thick form, which has a special name, I think. — Polystictus sanguineus
—Polyporus lucidus. Form mesopodial, also pleuropodial. It is not so laccate
as the European plant.— Lenzites betulina— Polystictus or Irpex, I am not
sure which. It is related to P. pergamenus.— Polyporus unnamed. Section
Pelloporus, close to P. circinnatus, but very distinct from any species named.

USSHER, C. B., Java:

Peziza Hindsii with sketch and photograph — Trametes Pers<><
Polystictus sanguineus — Polystictus occidentalis — Polyporus lucidus. Not
so laccate as the European form — Lenzites repanda, very thin form, marked
with a dark stain on upper side — Polystictus xanthopus— Polystictus versa-
tilis — Polyporus gibbosus — Fomes lignosus. This is a distinctive disease of
the rubber tree in the" East and much has been written about it lat>
Tropical Agriculture under the erroneous name Polyporus semitostus. The
type of semitostus has little resemblance to it. Mr. Ussher sends me a
photograph showing a rubber tree that has been killed by this parasite.
We shall reproduce it in Myc. Notes.

WHETSTONE, M. S., Minnesota:

Polyporus gilvus — Lentodius squamulosum — Scorias spongiosa —
Xylaria digitata, conidial— Fuligo septica— Hydnum ? not recognized by me.

WILDER, CHARLOTTE M., California:

Geaster limbatus — Lycoperdon. Species not sure for me. It has
hyaline capillitium and small, globose, smooth spores.

WILLIAMS, MISS CORA, Kentucky:
Mutinus elegans.

WILSON, REV. JAMES, Australia:

Daldinia concentrica — Polyporus betulinus— Strobilomyces palles-
cens. This species has fusoid spores, and voids the statement that the
"genus" Strobilomyces differs from Boletus in having "globose" spores.
— Polyporus rudis, three collections. One is the largest and most obese
specimen I have ever seen of this species. — Polystictus cinnabarinus. — Poly-
porus gilvus — Fomes australis — Strobilomyces (Sp.) — Polyporus unknown to
me and probably unnamed. It is close to P. corrugis of Europe. — Also
several Boletus, species which I can not determine from dried specimens.

WULFF, DR. EUGEN, Russia:

Daedalea juniperinus. On Juniperus excelsus. This is the first
record of the plant in Europe. It is rare in the United States. — Daedalea
quercina — Polystictus hirsutus.

WYMAN, MISS EDITH, Iowa:

Daedalea unicolor — Polystictus versicolor — Polyporus gilvus — Pa-
nus rudis — Schizophyllum commune — Hirneola auricula-Judae — Daedalea
confragosa — Panus stipticus.

YASUDA, PROF. A., Japan:

Polystictus perennis — Lenzites striata — Polyporus adustus — Spar-
assis crispa — Polystictus hirsutus, form pores adustus — Polystictus hirsutus
form albida — Lenzites tricolor — Schizophyllum commune — Stereum fascia-
turn — Polystictus versicolor. The pores abnormally colored from some cause
unknown to me. — Polystictus pergamenus — Polyporus unnamed. Same
habits and appearance as Polyporus Wynnei — Polyporus cuticularis, or an
unnamed species, different shape, and larger pores than the European plant.
— Polyporus unknown to me, with a stipe that appears to me not to be nor-
mal.— Daedalea. Form I think of the polymorphic Daedalea confragosa, but
very different hymenium shape from any form known to me. — Lenzites.
Same coloration as Lenzites. tricolor, but more thick and distant gills. — Also
a number of scanty collections of Hydnums, Stereum, etc., unnamed by me.

ZENKER, DR. G., Kamerun, Africa:

Lentinus dactyliophorus — Polyporus lignosus — Lenzites nivea, only
a smooth form of Lenzites aspera.

Advice received of packages from Geo. Brown, New Zealand; S. Hutch-
ings, Bengal; and A. Sarmento, Portugal, which I am afraid were lost in
transit.

10

AN INTERESTING LOT OF BLUNDERS.

I recently received from a correspondent an agaric growing on a t-nnit,.
nest, and sent it to Prof. Fetch for determination. He replied as folkm |

"Your specimen is Collyhia albuminosa (Berkeley) IVt.-h,

= Lepiota albuminosa, Berkeley (1847)

= ArmiIlaria eurhiza, Berkeley (1847)1

= Lentinus cartilaginous, Berkeley (1847).

= ColIybia sparsibarbis, Berkeley & Broom

= Pluteus Rajap, Ilr,lt(-rinan.

= Flammula Janseana, Henning & Nyman,
-Pholiota Janseana, Henning & Xyinan

= Pluteus termitam, P. Henning,

= Plut*us Treubianus, P. Henning & E. Xvinnn,

= l>luteus bogoriensis, P. Henning \ K xVman

— Flammnla tilipendula, P. Henning & K Xvman

= Tricholoma subgambosum Cesati,

= Collybia radicata of describers of dried tropical agaric

= \olvaria eurhiza (Berkeley) Fetch,

= Collybia eurhiza (Berkeley) v. Hohnel,
It i.s common in India, but the Indian synonyms are not yet known "

t is a pity that they do not know them from India', for it would add no much to
the scientific knowledge to include :i few more of these • •scicn.iti. -, ho de-

senbe tlie same plant as a "new ipeeies" in nine ditT. -rent genera

XOIK 20. I recently bought for eight marks a copy of Otto Kuntze's Rerisio
Gem-rum Plantarum" in three volumes, a book that originally sold f.,,-
marks. 1 his is a strong: reduction in a few years since it was issued, l.ut i*
index to the ralne that is now placed in the botanical world on the Kunt/e work and hi*
systetn ot jaac)in« names. The whole system wtu a fraud in the beginning, and it is
MirpriMim tbat any one should have been duped by such palpable trickery.

XOTK 21. Dr. Eugen Wulff has discovered Daedalea jiiniperinus growing on the
Juniperus excelsiis in Jtussla. This is the first ree..i.l ,,f the plum ».

is rather rare in the I'nited States. It first reached Kills from Martholo w, Kansaa,

and Kills named it Daedalea Kansensis. lie also so named it for me when I
it at .Mammoth Cave on the red cedar, also for Mrs. Dallas. Mr. Murrill found it in
Kills- herbarium so labeled no doubt, and at once discovered and published it a* .-, "new
.species" of Agaricus (sic). He carefully refrained from any allusion t.. the fact that
JCIlis had already named it, and that the name was well known to Ameri..,

Professor Morgan, to whom 1 sent the plant, was strongly inclined to refer aa a
variety of Daedalea quercinus, and Bresadola. to whom 1 al- ..f the

same opinion. I can not agre-e with this view, as I think Daedalea juniperinus is slron-flr
distinct from Daedalea quercinus. and i believe will so impress any one who is familiar
with both plants as they grow. I have also beliexed that it was Daedalen Mil.tn:
us named by Schweinitx. drawing my conclusion from Schweinit/ > s.nnu do.-npti.in . but
no specimen of it exists in any museum, and of course a conclusion drawn from a 'I
tiou merely is very uncertain. Still we would be just as much justified •
Schweinitz's species on the basis of "priority" as a large part of such •
done nowadays.

XO'l'K '22. Polyporus t'ilvns in Europe. — Polyporus cilvus which

abundance in America. Africa. India, and many warm countries of the «-nrlh. is Ktr*n*rljr
rare, almost absent from Europe. The only collector that we know to have found it wan
Quelet, and he discovered (of course! that it WHS a A little frasrornt

of Quelet's collection is found in the museum at I'p.-ala. and Mresaii»!a te|U me that h»
has it also from Quelet. It occurs in the English tc\l books, mid you would jud.
their pul.lications that you could go into the woods in England and find it any day.
Non. of the English botanists ever saw an English specimen, how. .rd in

Knidish mycology is due to Pries, who thought he recognized ti

by 's pictures. The picture looks little like it to me, but Fries' (rues* passe* in the
English text-books, without, however, stating the source of it. Out
lection of Quelet, I think there is no other from Europe pro,

terranean islands Mareucci distributed it as '•Koines fnlvuv - but it waa

not the type form of Polyporus gilvus but a soft, spongy I.TIM that should have a name.
The Marcucci collection belongs rather to the African type, where th- 'iiimon.

rather than to the European flora.

XOTK 23. "Polypoms plebins var. rubensU." This which wma ao refirrrd grim-

allv bv Berkelev i.s quite common in tropical America. I gathered it in abun.i

Florida rears a-o. and Father I.anglois found it common in I^.uisinna. It wa. n-ferr*d

bv Kllis'to Pohi.orus hemileucus, and has been so labeled in my eolh

.I'eveloi.s that hemileucus is a quite different plant. This plant »i

Brazil Hat recently as Polvponis plebius. There is „,, ,,u,.«tion »« t" it b,-inc H. ,

variet"', hough whether it has any relation to Polyporus pl.biu. (of N>w Zealand)
is not at all sure.

11

The following letter with the names somewhat changed (so that I trust
his identity will not be known) will afford, I hope, some of my readers as
much amusement as it has me:

PUMPKINVILLE POLYMORPHIC INSTITUTE,

Pumpkinville, Texas.
DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY,

Office of the Professor.
DR. C. G. LLOYD, December 19, 1911.

The Lloyd Library, Cincinnati, Ohio.
My Dear Mr. Lloyd:

Quite recently I have been looking over your valuable series of "Myco-
logical Notes," and, if you will allow me to compliment you, I may add that
I have enjoyed their uniformly serious tone. Your attitude toward nomen-
clature is in striking contrast to the fine disregard in which so many of our
taxonomists hold it. It is a serious matter, and I am glad that you for one
so regard it.

I have, however, been very much puzzled in re one point, which, I feel
sure, you, with your knowledge of the field of fungus taxonomy, will be
able to elucidate. I find the name of one Professor McGinty mentioned in
several instances. I suppose that, even though I must confess to almost
entire ignorance of the realm of the fungi from the point of view of classi-
fication, I should know this evidently eminent gentleman. But in view of
my failure to find his name in the lists of the various botanipal and other
scientific societies of this country, I venture to ask you, who have a wide
acquaintance among the foreign men of science, who this McGinty is.
Were it not for exposing my ignorance, I should further venture to ask the
publication of this inquiry in your valued "Notes," in the event that you
are unable to supply me with the desired information.
Yours very truly,

FRANCIS E. HONONYM.

P. S. — When I was attached to the Lumholz expedition to Mexico, we
had a mule (not an ass) who (sic) insisted on rolling every time he reached
the middle of a ford. This circumstance led to giving him a synonym,
McGinty: for at that time the song "Down Went McGinty" was much in
vogue. Having had the intimate acquaintance of this McGinty, I am natu-
rally anxious to identify the other, the to me at present unknown McGinty,
author of the new genus Martclla.

Dear Prof. Hononym: Cincinnati, 0., December 22, 1911.

I am in receipt of your inquiry of the 19th inst. I do not like the word
"ignorance" which you have used in self-accusation in the letter, but your
inquiry as to the identity of Prof. McGinty in a measure merits the term.
As he is one of the few American Mycologists who follow the "Rochester
Code" of their own free will, his identity is undoubtedly well known to your
former associates in New York. In addition he is frequently cited in the
botanical journals, particularly the foreign ones. I understand that he is
a brother-in-law of Mrs. Sairey Gamp. Yours truly,

C. G. LLOYD.

()90

UNIVERSE'

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

AT
LO
LIB!

603

L77m

v.3