NATURE STUDIES, V KNOWLEDGE" LIBRARY. NATURE STUDIES. GRANT ALLEN, ANDREW WILSON, THOMAS FOSTER, EDWARD CLODD, AND RICHARD A. PROCTOR. Let knowledge grow from more to more." — TENNYSON. LONDON : WYMAN & SONS, 74-76, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS, w.c. All rights reserved. WYMAN AND SONS, PRINTERS, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS, LONDON. W.C. PEEFACE. THE Essays in this volume are some among the con- tributions to KNOWLEDGE (the weekly journal, — but also, I trust, to knowledge itself) during the first ten months of its existence. Others by the same- Authors and Mr. Ranyard form f ' Leisure Readings," the fifth volume of the " Knowledge Library Series." The object in all these Essays has been that which the projectors of KNOWLEDGE have had in view, — to bring scientific facts before the public in simple but correct words, without perplexing readers, on the one hand, by recondite descriptions or technical terms, and without derogating, on the other hand, from the dignity of science. RICHARD A. PROCTOE. LONDON, December, 1882. CONTENTS. CHARLES E. DARWIN. BY E. A. PROCTOR Page 1 NEWTON AND DARWIN. BY E, A. PROCTOR 9 DREAMS. BY EDWARD CLODD 14 HONEY ANTS. BY GRANT ALLEN 25 COLOURS OF ANIMALS. BY ANDREW WILSON 32 A WINTER WEED. BY GRANT ALLEN 43 A POISONOUS LIZARD. BY ANDREW WILSON 50 BIRDS WITH TEETH. BY THOMAS FOSTER (illustrated) ... 54 THE FIJI ISLANDS. BY E, A. PROCTOR C4 HYACINTH BULBS. BY GRANT ALLEN 09 OUR UNBIDDEN GUESTS. BY ANDREW WILSON 76 THE FIRST DAFFODIL. BY GRANT ALLEN 84 STRANGE SKA MONSTERS. BY E. A. PROCTOR 90 THE ORIGIN OF BUTTERCUPS. BY GRANT ALLEN 98 FOUND LINKS. BY ANDREW WILSON (illustrated) 105 INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. BY E. A. PROCTOR (illustrated) 157 OUR ANCESTORS. BY GRANT ALLEN 212 THE BEETLE'S VIEW OF LIFE. BY GRANT ALLEN 237 WHAT is A GRAPE? BY GRANT ALLEN 244 GERMS OF DISEASE AND DEATH. .JY ANDREW WILSON 250 A WONDERFUL DISCOVERY. BY E. A. PROCTOR 259 BRAIN TROUBLES. BY E. A. PROCTOR 267 THOUGHT-EEADING. BY E. A. PROCTOR 310 MOXKSIIOOD. BY GRANT ALLEN NATTJEE STUDIES. CHARLES R. DARWIN. BY R. A. PROCTOR. CHARLES DARWIN, the Newton of Biology, died 011 Wednesday, April 19, 1882, aged 73 years. He was born on February 12, 1809, at Shrewsbury. His father was Dr. K. W. Darwin, F.R.S.; his grand- father Dr. Erasmus Darwin, F.R.S., author of "The Botanic Garden/' " Zoonomia," and other works. Shrewsbury Grammar School may fairly be proud of the circumstance that the most eminent naturalist of the nineteenth century was trained under her care. In 1825 Darwin left Shrewsbury for Edinburgh, where lie attended the University lectures for a period of two years, at the end of which he entered at Christ College, Cambridge. He took his degree in 1831. In this year he learned that Captain Fitzroy had offered to share his cabin with any competent naturalist who would accompany him in H.M.S. Beagle, which was about to sail on a voyage of cir- cumnavigation. Darwin tendered his services, and, doubtless, the world ewes to this circumstance, more B 2 NATURE STUDIES. than to any other, the wideness of Darwin's views as a naturalist, and the noble generalisation with which his name will in all future time be associated. The voyage of the Beagle has been described by himself in one of the most delightful works in the English language. The charm of foreign travel to a mind imbued, as Darwin's was, with a sense of the signifi- cance of all Nature's teachings, is graphically pre- sented in the "Journal of Researches into the Geology and Natural History of the Various Countries visited during the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle Round the World." Returning home with shattered health, but with his mind prepared to search successfully into the secrets of Nature, Darwin was in no haste to propound crude or immature speculations. The facts he had observed seemed, he tells us, to the domain of law, and consequently the recognition of the infinitely perfect nature of the laws of the universe (for only very excellent laws can work for long, and only perfect laws can work for ever) should have been regarded as antagonistic to religion in its wider and nobler sense, can only be regarded as resulting from the blindness, or the perversity, or the wrong-headedness, of the ignorant. That some of NEWTON AND DARWIN. I3 the fancies of dogmatic religion, some parts of the complex systems which the Kabbmistic type of erudi- tion has invented in all religions, should seem incom- patible with these developments of our knowledge and still wider enlargements of our conceptio s, can be understood. But that religion, in which all men may (in which all reasoning men must) agree, has been rendered infinitely grander — infinitely more im- pressive by our new knowledge. It has also been rendered infinitely more reasonable. Men had spoken of God as Omnipresent and Almighty, but they had assigned a mere point in space as his domain ; they had described him as Eternal, but they had recog- nised his influence as existing for the merest second of time ; and finally they had in words attributed all Wisdom to him, while in fact they had limited his wisdom to the provision of laws capable of operating but imperfectly, and for a brief period. Science shows now the infinite domain of the Omnipresent, its inconceivably vast duration, the perfection of tho laws which so rule it that they operate throughout all space and all time. Yet a few who cannot raise their eyes from this petty earth to the heavens, or extend their thoughts to perceive the perfection of the laws governing a universe for all time (as we know time) find no nobler teaching in these grandest revelations of science than that ' ' God is set on one side in the name of universal evolution." It is as though men who had observed but the working of a clock's escapement should regard the discovery of the train of wheels 14 NATURE STUDIES. leading to the escapement-wheel proof positive that no reasoning mind had fashioned the mechanism. That which the bigoted on either side, the religious and the irreligious fanatic alike, agree in regarding as the disproof — if admitted — of a Being working "in and through all things/' affords in reality the most overwhelming evidence, the solemnest demonstration that such a Being exists : though science must say of Him now as was said of old by Elihu, " as touching the Almighty, we cannot find him out." DREAMS. BY EDWARD CLODD. THE remarks which follow some questions concerning the attitude of science towards dreams, asked in one of the earlier numbers of Knowledge, indicate how belief in their quasi-supernatural character lurks in the minds of intelligent persons who would resent being called superstitious. Certainly, the antiquity and persistence of that belief are small matter of wonder when we reflect that the phenomena of dreaming are precisely of a character to sustain that feeling of mystery which man's surroundings awaken within him ; but an inquiry into its origin and growth may best dispel it, while such an inquiry will add its witness to that of DREAMS i~ the " great cloud of witnesses " concerning the sur- vival, often in least suspected form, of rude primitive philosophies among the elaborated beliefs of civilised races. The youngest and most vigorous of the sciences, Anthropology, has already made us familiar with the nature of a vast body of evidence, uniform in character, unearthed from old river-valleys, caverns, mounds, and tombs, witnessing to the primitive savagery of man and his slow uprising therefrom; but such evidence touches us only on the intellectual side. Even should desired skeletons of veritable men of miocene times — still better, of the tc missing" homo simius — turn up, we should yet be within the limits of paleontology and zoology. Such relics of our remote ancestry would remain specimens only — ( ' a little less than kin." It is not until the evidence from the Drift and from surface remains (about which Knowledge may hereafter tell its readers more in detail) gives place to that supplied by immaterial relics — articulate speech, myths which were for the time real, and sufficing explanations to him — that man touches us as fcllow-man, as thinker,1 striving to read " the riddle of the painful earth, " and to peer into the mysteries of being. Now, for the purpose of this inquiry, it is needful to have understanding of the mental condition of 1 "Man, a derivative root, means to think. From this we have the Sanskrit maim, originally thinker, then man." — Max Miillers Led. Lang. L, 437. 1 6 NATURE STUDIES. races in low stages of culture, and, generally, it may- be said that the modern savage is, as the primitive savage was, in a state of " fog " concerning the nature and relation of what is in the mind to what is outside it. In this he may perchance command the sympathy of the modern philosopher, there being this important difference between the two, that while the philosopher speculates upon the nature of the connexion between his mind and the external world, and confesses that "his knowledge of matter is restricted to those feelings of which he assumes it to be the cause/' the savage has no capacity for such , thought at all. He has nothing in his slender stock of words corre- sponding to the terms " objective " and " subjective ; " that stock has 110 substantive verb " to be " — as, indeed, few of the languages of the world have ever had. He cannot distinguish between an idea and an object, an illusion and a reality, a substance and its image or shadow ; and under bodily ailment, indiges- tion born of gorging, or delirium caused by starving, gives shape and substance, a " local habitation and a name/' to "airy nothings/' spectres of diseased or morbid imagination. Misled by superficial resem- blances, he jumps at the most absurd conclusions ; ignorant of the necessary relation between cause and effect, he is " carried about with every wind of " fancy ; nor has he the capacity, which is the measure of intellectual growth, to strip the special of its accidents, and sink it in the general. For example, he gives a different name to the tails DREAMS. 17 of various animals, but has no name for "tail" in general; he can speak of sunshine, candle, fire-flame, &c., but "light" is an abstract term which he is unable to grasp. Such is his confusion between a thing and its symbol, that the name of a man is held to be an integral part of himself ; he shrinks from revealing his own, lest the man to whom he imparts it injures him through it ; still more does he recoil from naming the dead, or powers credited with bale- ful influence. He dreads having his portrait taken, feeling that some part of himself has gone in the process ; the better the likeness, the more has " virtue gone out of him." Catlin relates that he caused great commotion among the Sioux by drawing one of their chiefs in profile. " Why was half his face left out ? " they asked ; ' ' Mahtoochega was never ashamed to look a white man in the face." The chief himself did not take offence, but Shonka, the Dog, taunted him, saying, "The Englishman knows that you are but half a man ; he has painted but one-half of your face, and knows that the rest is good for nothing." Which led to a quarrel, and in the end Mahtoochega was shot, the bullet tearing away just that part of the face which Catlin had not drawn. We may now more clearly understand how the savage will interpret phenomena of a more complex order, and why he can interpret these only in one way. The phantasies which have flitted across the brain in coherent order or unrelated succession when complete sleep was lacking, leave the traces of their passage on !8 NATURE STUDIES. the memory, and they are strong of head and heart, " true peptics who have no system/' as Carlyle says, whose awakened consciousness is not affected by the harmonious or discordant, the painful or pleasant, illusions which have composed their dreams. But while for us they fill an empty moment in the telling, albeit now and again causing fc eerie " feelings, and quickening such remains of superstition as slumber in the majority of us, they are to the untrained intelli- gence of the savage as solid as the experiences of his waking moments, true not only " while they last," but for ever afterwards. And the limits of his language only deepen the confusion within him when he tells what he has seen, and heard, and felt, and whither he has been. For the speech cannot transcend the thought, and therefore can represent neither to him- self nor to his hearers the difference between the illusions of the night and the realities of the day. The dead relations and friends who appear in dreams and live their old life; with whom he joins in the battle or the chase ; with whom, the toils over, he sits down to feast, not, like the Psalmist, in the presence of his enemies, but upon succulent slices of the enemies themselves; the foes with whom he struggles, the wild beasts from which he flees, or in whose grip he feels himself, and, shrieking, awakens his squaw ; the long distances he travels to dreamlands beyond and above — are all real, and no "baseless fabric of a vision." The belief is strengthened by that intensified form of dreaming called "night- DREAMS. 19 mare/'1 when gaping, grinning spectre-monsters sit upon the breast, stopping breath and paralysing motion, which has helped to create the vast army of nocturnal demons that fill the folk-lore of the world, and that under infinite variety of hideousness have had lodg- ment for centuries in the beliefs of higher races. What Schoolcraf t says of the Indian mind, that ' e a, dream or a fact is alike patent to it," applies through- out the whole range of the lower culture, a marked and wide-spread form of the confusion being in the belief that the soul leaves the body during sleep. Among the Zulus, when dead relatives appear to a man in his sleep, he concludes that their spirits still live, and the savage notion, that a sleeper should not be wakened, because of the possible absence of his soul, finds some continuity in the belief of medieeval times, that trance and catalepsy were proofs of the temporary departure of the soul from the body. Hence, as Mr. Fiske has remarked, " it was no easy matter for a person accused of witchcraft to prove an alibi ; for to any amount of evidence showing that the body was innocently reposing at home and in bed, the answer was obvious, that the soul may, nevertheless, have been in attendance at the witches' Sabbath, or busied in maiming a neighbour's cattle ! " Keeping in mind what has been said about savage mental philosophy, it is not surprising that the infe- rence drawn from the phenomena of dreams is belief 1 i.e. Night spirit. A.S. mare, nymph. C 2 20 NATURE STUDIES. in a double existence. Besides that waking self of which the savage is hazily conscious, there must be another self, which, roaming the world while the body is at rest, sees and does the things dreamed. Waking, the savage knows, or will be told, that whatever his dreams reveal to the contrary, he has not moved from, the place where he lay down; therefore it is that ghost-soul — that other self — which has been away on the strange or familiar errand. And such belief in another self — in the body, yet at times not of it — is confirmed by daily experience. There are the suspen- sions of consciousness witnessed in swoon, apoplexy, catalepsy, and other forms of insensibility. Then there are the phenomena of shadows and reflection^ actual existences to the savage, mocking doubles of himself. The shadow accompanies, goes before, or follows him by sunlight and by moonshine, disap- pearing mysteriously only when they are withdrawn or intercepted. Still more complete in its mimicry is the reflection of himself — the image repeating every gesture, while perchance, as he stands shouting by the stream, the echo of his voice is thrown back from the hill-side, and adds confirmation to his notion of duality. How else can man at low stages of thinking, ignorant of the laws that govern the reflection of both sound and light, interpret the shadow and the echo ? Hence it is that we find the word for " shadow" chosen to express this other self in both barbaric and civilised speech, from the dialects of both North and South American and African tribes, to the classic and DREAMS. 21 •modern languages, as witness the sJcia of the Greeks, the manes or umbra of the Romans, and the shade of •our own tongue. Did the limits of a brief paper allow, it would be easy to show, from the evidence of language, how man explained to himself the mode in which this other self makes the passage from the body to the external world, and wherein lay the difference between the sleeping and waking, the living and lifeless body. It must suffice to say that throughout the entire savage and civilised world, the life, the spirit, the soul of man has been identified with breath. Not with that alone; but with the blood, the heart, &c., although chiefly and universally with the act of breathing, "so characteristic of the higher animals during life, and coinciding so closely with life in its departure." It is interesting to watch the primitive nebulous theories of another self, a vaporous, ethereal, or other- wise unsubstantial, impalpable thing, condensing into theories of semi- substantiality, or of rude or refined resemblance to the body, theories which become indispensable to account for the appearance of both the living and the dead in dreams, when their persons were clasped, their forms and faces seen, their voices heard. Such theories differ not in kind, but only in degree of refinement, and unite, as Dr. Ty lor remarks, "in an unbroken line of mental connexion," the savage fetish worshipper and the civilised psychologist adding their welcome witness to the similar working of 22 NATURE STUDIES. untrained intelligence in different ages among different races on corresponding levels of culture, and therefore to the underlying unity of our race. This we shall realise only as we realise that the laws of mind, liko those of matter, are uniform, and approximately cal- culable in their operation; the phenomena of one interrelated and interdependent as are the phenomena of the other, and equally the subjects of observation and comparison, if not by identical methods, yet on like principles. It would be an interesting and informing chapter- in the history of the illusions through which man has made continuous, and as yet unaccomplished, passage to the truth, to show how belief in indwelling spirits, of fitful habit and varying form, was enlarged to belief in souls in the lower animals, in plants, and in lifeless things, from stars to stones ; how the phantasms of the brain have filled earth, sea, and sky with spirits innumerable, from white-winged celestials to the degraded ghosts of haunted houses. But this would be an- undue extension of the subject, for the com- pleteness of which some reference must be made to the part played by dreams as supposed media of com- munication between gods and men, and as monitions of coming events. The awe and wonder excited in the savage mind by waving trees and swirling waters, by drifting cloud, whistling wind, and stately march of sun. and rnoon — all invested by him with personal life and will — were immensely quickened by his dreams. In their unre- DREAMS. 23 lated and bewildering incidents, the powers indwelling in all things around him seemed to come nearer than IQ the more monotonous events of the day, uttering their \varnings and conveying their messages. There needed but slender data to reach conclusions. Let the death of a friend be dreamt of, and the event follow; or a hunting-feast fill the half -torpid fancy, and a day's privation give the lie to the dream ; the arbitrary relation is made. Lord Bacon says : — "Men mark the hits, but not the misses," and a thousand dreams unfulfilled count as nothing against one dream fulfilled. Out of that a canon of inter- pretation is framed by which whole races of men will xplain their dreams, never staying to wonder that the correspondences are not more frequent and minute than they really are. " To this delusion/' says Cornelius Agrippa, an ancient rationalist, "not a few great philosophers have given a little credit .... so far building upon examples of dreams, which some accident hath made to be true, that thence they endeavour to persuade men that there are no dreams bub what are real." When Homer says that te dreams, too, from Jove pro- ceed/'1 painting the vividness and agonising incom- pleteness of those passing visions; when Tertulliau says that " we receive dreams from God, there being no man so foolish as never to have known any d?eains come true/' both classic and patristic opinion are 1 " Iliad," Book I., 77. 24 NATURE STUDIES. clearly survivals from the lower culture, its lineal and thinly-disguised descendants. For the savage, the bard, and the theologian lived in days when the con- caption of orderly sequence was unthinkable to them ; where the arbitrary act was wrought, the isolated or the conflicting influence manifest, there tne deity or the devil was present ; while for us, could we discover where law is not, thence God would seem to have withdrawn. The passage from the crude interpretation of his dreams by the savage to the formal elaboration of the dream-oracle is obvious, the more so as this latter was only one of many modes by which it was sought to divine the will of heaven, and read that " book of fate " hidden from men. This dream-lore, as ancient records far back to Accadian times show, not only called into existence a class of men whose position as interpreters of royal and other dreams ensured them commanding place, but gave rise to a mass of literature most prolific in classic times. It maintained an almost canonical supremacy down to the Middle Ages, finding its befitting level in our day in the ' ' Libri dei Sogni " which the Italian lottery-gambler consults, and in the "Imperial Dream-Book" by which the English domestic forecasts whether King Cophetua or Police- sergeant X 32 is to be her fate ! At this nether depth, Science, content with having shown the persistence of primitive modes of thinking in all subsequent interpretation of his own nature by man ; finding its evidence and the warrant of its con- DEE A MS. 25 -elusions in that human experience which the sources of our knowledge cannot transcend; may well let the matter rest. It need not concern itself with denials that dreams have been sent as warnings from Heaven to man; this were as foolish as to take pains to dis- prove the existence of ghosts, or to seriously challenge the predictions in Zadkiel's Vox Stcllarum. Science need not argue; it explains; and to such matters explanation is death. For the changes which reve- lation of the order of nature and the establishment of that doctrine of continuity, which has no " favoured- nation " clause for man, involve, will bring about, in quiet and unmourned, the departure of belief in dreams as omens or warnings, just as they have brought about the decay of belief in witchcraft and .astrology. HONEY ANTS. BY GRANT ALLEN. THE Garden of the Gods in Colorado is a bit of show- scenery of the true American type — a green amphi- theatre, studded with vast ledges and cliffs of red sandstone, weathered here and there into chimneys or pillars, in which a distorted fancy traces some vague resemblance to the sculptured forms of the Hellenic gods. Hither, a few years since, Dr. McCook, of Philadelphia, went on his way to New Mexico, where he wished to study the habits and manners of a 26 NATURE STUDIES. famous, little-known insect, the honey ant. To his surprise, he accidentally stumbled here upon the very creatures he had set out to find. There are two kinds of entomologists : one kind, now, let us hope, rapidly verging to extinction, sticks a pin through his speci- mens, mounts them in a cabinet, gives them system- atic names, and then considers that he has performed the whole duty of a man and a naturalist ; the other kind, now, let us hope, growing more usual every day, goes afield to watch the very life of the creatures themselves at home, and tries to learn their habits and customs in their own native haunts. Dr. McCook belongs to the second class. He forthwith pitched his tent (literally) in the Garden of the Gods, and proceeded to study the honey ants on the spot. Like many other ants, these little honey-eaters are divided into different castes or classes; for besides the primary division into queens or fertile females, winged ants or males, and workers or neuters, the last-named class is further sub-divided into three castes of majors, minors, and minims or dwarfs. But the special peculiarity which gives so much interest to this species is the fact that it possesses, apparently at least, a fourth caste, that of the honey-bearers, whose abdomen is distended till it is almost spherical by a vast quantity of nectar stored within it. Dr. McCook opened several of the nests, and found these honey-bearers suspended like flies from the ceiling, to which they clung by their legs and appendages. All over the vaulted dome of the ant-hill, these little HONEY ANTS. 2/ creatures were clustered in numbers, their yellow bodies pressed tight to the roof, while their big round stomachs hung down behind from the slender waist, perfect globes of translucent tissue, showing the amber honey distinctly through the distended skin* They looked like large white currants, or sweet-water grapes ; and as they were actually filled with grape-sugar, the resemblance was really quite as true inside as out. Where did the honey come from ? That was the next question. Everybody knows that ants are very fond of sugar, and they often steal the nectar in flowers which the plant has put there to entice the fertilising bee. So much damage do they do in this way, that many plants have clothed their stalks with hairs, or sticky glands, on purpose, in order to pre- vent the ants from creeping up the stem and rifling the nectary. In other cases, however, plants actually lay by honey to allure the ants, when they have any- thing to gain from their visits, as in the case of those Central American acacias, mentioned by Mr. Belt, which have a nectar-gland on the leaf-stalk to attract certain bellicose ants, which so protect them from the ravages of their leaf -cutting congeners. Of course, everybody has heard, too, how our own species sucks honej^dew from the little aphides, or plant-lice, which have often been described as ant- cows. But it is not in either of these ways that the honey-ants get their sugar. Dr. McCook had a little trouble in settling this matter at first, for the honey- 28 NATURE STUDIES. ants are a nocturnal species, and he had to follow them through the thick scrub, lantern in hand; still, lie satisfactorily settled at last that they obtain the nectar from the galls en an oak, where it must simply .be exuded as an accidental product of injury. The workers take it home with them, and give it to the honey-bearers, who swallow but do not digest it. They keep it in their crops ready for use, exactly as bees keep it in cells of the honey-comb. When the workers are hungry they caress a honey-bearer with their antennas, whereupon she presses back a little of the nectar up her throat, and the workers sip it from her mouth. The honey-bearers, in short, have been •converted into living honey-jars. They are thus pas- sively useful to the community, for in this curiously- ordered commonwealth "they also serve who only stand and wait/' How could such a strange result as this have been brought about ? Dr. Me Cook, though not himself an •avowed evolutionist, has supplied us with facts which seem to suggest the proper answer to this difficult question. He has shown that the rotunds (as he calls them) are not, in all probability, a separate caste, but are merely certain specialised individuals taken at haphazard from the worker-major class. He him- self saw in the nests many worker - majors, which seemed at that moment actually in course of trans- formation into honey-bearers. Now, it is easy enough to understand why these social insects should wish to store up food against emergencies. At all times, the HONEY ANTS. 29 queen, the young female ants, the males, and the- grubs or larvae are entirely dependent upon others for support. Hence, alike among bees and ants, stores of food are habitually laid by, sometimes in the form of honey in combs and bee-bread, as with the hive-bee; sometimes in the form of seeds and grains, as with the harvesting ants. During the- winter months or the rainy season, when food fails outdoors, there must be some reservoir at home to meet the demand of the starving community. Under such circumstances, any trick of manner which tended to produce a habit of storing food would be highly useful to the nest as a whole ; and taking nests as units in the struggle for existence, which they really are, those nests which possessed any such trick would survive in seasons when others might perish. So the tendency, once set up, would grow and be strengthened from generation to generation, those ants which stored most food being most likely to tide over bad times, and to hand on their own peculiarities to the other swarms or nests which took origin from them. A set of primitive ants, living upon the honey of the oak-galls, have no tendency to produce wax, like bees, because their habits with regard to their larvae do not lead them to make such cells at all. The eggs and grubs simply lie about loose amongst the cham- bers of the ant-hill, instead of being confined in regular hexagonal cradles. Hence the bees' mode of honey-storing is practically impossible for them : they have not the groundwork habit from which it might 3o NATURE STUDIES. be developed. But the ants have a crop, or first stomach, in which they store their undigested food, before passing it into the gizzard, exactly as in fowls. When ants come back from feeding, whether on flowers, on aphides, or on galls, their crops are very much distended ; and they can bring back the food to their mouths from these distended crops, to supply the grubs and their other helpless dependents in the nest. If therefore some of the ants were largely to over-eat themselves, they would be able to feed an exceptionally large number of dependants. Dr. McCook observed that some very greedy workers, returning to the nest, fastened themselves upon the roof in the same position as the honey- bearers, and in fact seemed gradually to grow into rotunds. The other ants would soon learn that such lazy, overgrown creatures were the best to go to for food ; and, in time, these gorgers might easily become specialised into a honey-bearing set of insects. The workers would bring them honey, which they would store up and disgorge as needed for the benefit of the rest as a whole. If the honey passed into their gizzards and was digested, they would be a positive dead loss to the community, and so the tendency would soon be eliminated by natural selection, because the nests possessing such workers could not hold their own in bad times against neighbouring com- munities. But as only a very small quantity is ever digested — just as much as is necessary to keep up the sedentary life of such immovable fixtures — the effect HONEY ANTS. 3 r is about the same as if the honey were stored in cells of wax. The ants, in fact, utilise the only good vessel or utensil they have at their disposal, the flexible and extensible abdomen of their own comrades. The greatest difficulty is to understand how the workers first acquired the habit of feeding these lazy members to such repletion; but as all ants "take toll " of one another, this is much less of a crux than it looks at first sight. A very greedy ant, which not only ate much itself while out foraging, but also took toll of all others in the nest, after it was too full to move about readily, would be in a fair way to become a rotund. And as it would thus be performing a use- ful function for the rest, at the same that it was grati- fying its own epicurean tastes, the habit would soon become fixed and specialised, till at last we should get just such a regular and settled form of honey-storing as we see in this Colorado species. Indeed, another totally distinct type of ant in Australia has arrived at exactly the same device quite separately, as so often happens in nature under similar circumstances. What- ever benefits one creature under any given conditions will also benefit others whose conditions are identical ; and thus we often get adaptive resemblances between plants and animals very widely removed from one another in genealogical order. 32 if A TUEE STUDIES. COLOURS OF ANIMALS. BY DR. ANDREW WILSON, F.R.S.E. THERE is a suggestive passage in Butler's "Hudibras/* which maintains that — " Fools are known by looking wise, As men find woodcocks by their eyes." And if the axiom be correct, that a poet is only great when he is true to nature, it must be admitted that Butler has been singularly felicitous in this metaphor. Whoever has seen a woodcock in its ordinary summer plumage may form a good idea of the truth of the poetic remark. As that bird moves about amongst the fallen leaves of autumn, the greys and browns and yellows of its feathers mingle so beautifully with the like tints of its surroundings, that the animal is absolutely concealed from any view but the practised eye of the sportsman. As has been remarked of the bird in question, even the very conspicuous and orna- mental tail becomes hidden from view in a most singular fashion. Below, these tail-feathers exhibit a white colour tinted with a silver sheen and marked with a deep black. Nothing more conspicuous than such an ornament can well be imagined ; yet the tail and its belongings are, nevertheless, wonderfully con- cealed. For, as the bird reposes, these under lines and tints are placed downwards ; and above, the ashen-grey tints mingle perfectly with the bird's COLOURS OF ANIMALS. 33 surroundings. As the woodcock, therefore, rests amid its background of wood and foreground of fallen leaves, every line of its plumage is made to assimilate so closely with the objects around, that the bird's presence, even a short distance off, is not suspected. The woodcock is by no means alone in this har- mony betwixt its plumage and its surroundings. The sand-grouse of the deserts, for instance, exhibit a like harmony. These birds cannot be detected, even as they run, amidst the sand of their haunts, so closely imitated in the dull tints of their plumage is the tone of the desert wild. The well-known case of the ptar- migan is even more extraordinary still. In summer the bird shows a plumage of pearly grey, which con- ceals it perfectly as it lies on its bed of Scottish heather, mingled with the lichen and its kith and kin. Bufc when the winter snows descend and coat the hill-sides with a mantle of white, then a kindly nature still con- trives concealment for the ptarmigan in a fresh suit of colour. The pearly greys of the summer arc replaced by a plumage of snowy whiteness, and, save for its dark eye, there is little risk of the dis- covery of the bird by the unwary or unpractised sportsman. The grouse and common partridge are not less perfectly protected. The hues of the grouse match the tints of the heather, and the partridge is almost as difficult to discover — say, in a ploughed field — as the ptarmigan on the hill-side. The birds just mentioned are all rasorial birds; that is, they are allied to the type of the common fowl, and are typi- D 34 NATURE STUDIES. cally ground-livers. Their tints,, therefore, assimilate- with those of the ground and with, ground vegetation ; and whatever may be the ultimate philosophy which, shows the origin of such, harmonies, it is very plain that the utilitarian is bound to read "protection " in every line of the story. Escape from their enemies must be favoured by the correspondence in colour to which we allude. The harmonies of colour present the safest, and therefore the best foil, to the keenness of sight of the eagle, and to the agility of the falcon and its kind. It is different, indeed, with the songsters of the wood and grove. With well-de- veloped powers of flight, and with a close refuge amid the foliage of the wood, the appearance of bright hues and tints in these birds is by no means disadvan- tageous. Another law — that of the development of colour in relation to sex — has taken precedence of the regulation of colour as a means of protection. If concealment be necessary, nature will teach the art of hiding in other ways than that whereby she contrives to make the partridge face danger with a stillness that almost rivals that of the stones, trustful in the harmony of her plumage that so closely matches her heather bed. But there are wider fields open to the naturalist's survey of colour and its meanings. Suppose that we peer for a moment into the class of fishes, we shall find the adaptation of colour to surroundings illustrated in a very apt degree. Whoever has tried to spear a sole or flounder, for example, well knows that the COLOURS OF ANIMALS. 35 excitement of the sport consists in the endeavour to follow out the axiom of Mrs. Glasse, and on tlie prin- ciple which that worthy lady laid down about " first catching your hare," to first catch your flounder. You cautiously and softly paddle out to shallow water in your punt, and you drift over the flat, sandy beach at a depth of from two to three feet. Below, the water is as clear as crystal. Here and there you see a lazy starfish on the march, exerting himself to the utmost, as he slowly extends ray after ray, and crawls at the rate of about a mile a month or so, by aid of his hundreds of sucker-feet. The sand-eels annoy you ns they burrow downwards and send up little clouds of dust on your approach ; but the flounders you came to spear — where are they? and echo seems but to answer ' ' Where ?" But the practised sportsman bids you learn (as in all other sciences and arts) the first lesson — namely, how to see and observe. As your boat creeps along, he points to what seems a mere sandy lump, but in which his keener eye has detected the merest wriggle of a fin. Dash ! goes the spear, and up comes a flounder, and as you watch the ground, you see dozens, it may be, of similar sandy patches swimming off in rapid alarm. The flounder's " back," — it is really the side of the fish, — on which it lies is white enough, as we know ; but the " other side " is as close a representation of a sandy patch as you can either see or imagine. Small wonder then that in flounder-spearing you experience the difficulties which nature throws in the way of capture through D 2 36 NATUEE STUDIES. likeness in colour to the animal's surroundings. It is the same with soles, turbot, and with the skates and angel-fishes. Watch the first flounder you see resting on the sandy bed of the Aquariam-tank, and you will receive ample proof of the truth of the foregoing remarks. And should you chance to see the lazy " monk/' or angel-fish, as it lies prone, heavy, and indolent in the highest degree in the flow of its tank, you may again understand something of the value of colour as a means of protection to animal life. In the case of those a crest, concealment is effected in a slightly different fashion from that prevalent among the soles. Hero the body, as a rule, possesses long streamers or fringes that mimic the seaweeds; so that, as the animal reposes, its body may well enough represent a stone,, to which are attached fragments of marine vegetation. The Australian sea-horses, which live among red sea- weeds, have streamers of that hue attached to their bodies, and the mimicry and imitation of their sur- roundings are thus very complete, Even their near neighbours, the pipe-fishes, with green bodies, when they fasten themselves to some fixed object, and "loll" in the water, may closely resemble an inert piece of green weed. Amongst even the highest animals, protective colouring is common. A lion's hue matches the sandr COLOURS OF ANIMALS. 37 =as a tiger's stripes, according to Mr. Wallace, imitate very closely the foliage and trees amidst which, it ^crouches. The camel's coat is sandy like its desert ; 4ind the rabbits offer as plain examples as any of the •colour-harmony in question. The polar bear is white, like the arctic fox in winter dress ; and the nocturnal rats and moles are dressed in shades the opposite of the ghost-like hues that become so conspicuous at night. But, descending to still lower grades of life, we may •discover examples of this "mimicry/' not only of surroundings, but also of lifeless or inorganic objects, and of, it may be, plant structures as well, on the part of animals. The so-called "stick insects/' or "walking twigs," as they are often called — the Phasmidcc of the naturalist — present us with the most perfect reproduc- tions of bits of dried twigs. A figure of one of these insects is before me as I write. It is represented climbing on the delicate branch of a shrub, and but for the expectation of what one is looking for, there would be considerable difficulty in determining which is insect and which plant. The bodies of these "twig insects " — which belong, by the way, to the Orthoptera, or that order which harbours the familiar crickets and grasshoppers — are represented by mere lines. The wings have disappeared, and it has been remarked, that in their gait these insects exhibit a peculiar habit of using their legs in a singularly awkward fashion, and thus apparently aid the illusion of the spectator .that he is regarding a dried twig, moved erratically by the wind. 3 8 NATUEE STUDIES. More extraordinary still are the " leaf insects " ; near allies, indeed, of the "walking-sticks." Here " mimicry " of the plant proceeds so far as to fully justify the eminent naturalist's remarks, that it is strange to find the animal assuming a mimetic dis- guise and apeing the actor's art. The wings in the " leaf insects " exactly imitate leaves. The venation, or arrangement of the veins in the leaf, is clearly seen, and in one form (Pltyllium) even the chest and legs of the animal assume leaf-like characters. When such an insect rests amid foliage, the value of such a close resemblance to its plant surroundings as a means of protection can be readily understood. In some " leaf insects " — all of which are tropical species — the wings resemble leaves that are dried and withered. In others, the minute fungi that attack leaves are imitated. Mr. A. K. Wallace tells us that one of the " walking-sticks " obtained by him in Borneo " was covered over with foliaceous excrescences of a clear olive-green colour, so as exactly, to resemble a stick grown over by a creeping moss or Jungermannia. The Dyak who brought it me assured me it was grown over with moss, though alive, and it -was only after a most minute examination that I could convince myself that it was not so." Lastly, there may be noticed in connexion with these curious traits of animal life, the fact that certain animals, themselves harmless and inoffensive, may assume the exact appearance of offensive neighbours. In this respect, certain butterflies are facile principc- COLOURS OF ANIMALS. 39 Certain South. American butterflies, known collectively under their family name of Heliconidce, exhibit a bril- liant colouration, but likewise possess a very strong odour; and, it may be presumed from the sequel, a highly disagreeable taste as well. They are highly conspicuous insects, and the under sides of their wings are as brilliantly coloured as the upper surfaces ; so that, even in repose, and when resting with the wings apposed over the back, they are readily enough seen. Their colours are prominent, not to say gaudy. Yellows, reds, and whites commingle with blacks, blues, and other tints in a striking fashion. They are, further, by no means rapid flyers, and, putting the foregoing circumstances of their gaudy colour and their slow movements together, no group of animals would seem more liable to the attacks of bird-enemies than these Helicon butterflies. Yet the reverse is the case. So far from being decimated, their race flourishes apace, and this result is clearly due to the strong odour and nauseous taste they possess. The mere touch of a Helicon is in itself a pungent matter, which reminds one of nothing so much as the persistence of the musk-rat's secretion, or the still more awful effluvium of the American skunk. Their neighbour butterflies may fall victims by the score to the rapacity of their feathered enemies, but the Helicons are spared from even the semblance of attack. So far there seems nothing unusual or striking in a group of butterflies being protected, through strong odour and worse taste, from their natural enemies, 40 NATURE STUDIES. the birds. But now comes the most curious phase of this history. Another and distinct family of butter- flies, known as the Leptalidce, allied to the common white cabbage butterfly, and removed from the Heli- cons, also possesses representatives in South America. There are no points of agreement between the Lep- talides and the Helicons, save, indeed, that both are butterflies. Furthermore, the Leptalides are entirely destitute of the nauseous odour and of the strong taste of the Helicons, and in respect of their more agreeable presence, should become a prominent article — as do other butterflies — in the bill of fare of the birds. Yet, strangely enough, the Leptalides escape persecution ; and the reason is not far to seek or difficult to find. When they are carefully examined, certain species of the Leptalides are seen to be exact facsimiles, in colour and appearance, of the stinking Helicons ! Naturalists at first classed both as He- licons, until a closer examination showed the differ- ence between these butterflies, and likewise proved that the Leptalides had thus "mimicked" in the plainest possible manner the colours of their strong- smelling neighbours. Nor are the colours alone imitated. The very shape of the Helicon's wings is reproduced in those of the Leptalides, and the " feelers " likewise mimic those of the former group. Again, special forms of Leptalides " mimic" special forms of Helicons. The flight has become of similar character in both species, and the habits have been also slavishly copied. COLOURS OF ANIMALS. 41 Such instances as these certainly present <( food for thought " to the reflective mind. It is the business •of philosophy to account for facts by placing the facts in scientific juxtaposition — philosophy, in this light, is the thread upon which the pearls of knowledge are strung. What, then, it may be asked, is the philo- sophy which can explain the curious resemblances seen in the animal world, ranging from, say, a mere likeness in tint to the surroundings (as in the flounder or woodcock), through more intensified likenesses, to the exact " mimicry " and to the slavish copy of colour and form, as in the butterflies ? A first and highly-important feature in the con- sideration of the case is found in the fact that there is a gradation in the degree of ' ' mimicry." From the mere sand or ground tinting of the flounder to the exact colouring of the butterflies is, of course, a wide step, but it is one which is bridged over by inter- mediate examples and stages. Then, secondly, we discover a purpose or use in the disguises : that pur- pose, apart from any considerations of its origin, being the protection of the animal from its enemies, and the consequent good and increase of its race. Thirdly, it appears possible to account for these curious transformations and disguises by finding an initial step. It is the old story of le premier pas qui coute, applied to natural history research; and this first step is found in the solid 'axiom, that every living species is liable to variation and change. Next suc- ceeds the consideration that such varieties as are 42 NATURE STUDIES. produced Lave to " struggle for existence." Suppose a number of white varieties produced in a cold, snowy region, along with varieties of more conspicuous colours. It is evident that, whilst the white varieties would escape from their enemies,, the darker- coloured individuals would succumb. Thus the white race comes to the front, and holds its own, and its per- petuation and increase becomes a matter of surety. Summing tip the argument, we find that two factors are at work in bringing about these wonderful colour likenesses in the animal world. The one is variation, producing the colour-varieties ; the other is the cir- cumstances of life, which weed out the weak and give the battle to the strong, which latter are those whose colours best suit their surroundings. This is the philosophy which natural history to-day lays down for our acceptance. Nay, more, it is a philosophy which explains far more important facts of life than mere mimicry. It is " evolution and development " reduced to their plainest and fundamental terms — in a word, Darwinism in a nutshell, as illustrated by the varia- tion and change that all life knows, and by the warring of that life bringing the best of its units to the front of the battle. NATURE STUDIES. 43 A WINTER WEED. BY GRANT ALLEX. A DAY or two of warm weather, wafted to us by the westerly breezes, has brought out the daisies on the lawn as vigorously as if it were May, instead of January. The sward is dappled all over with their little timid white blossoms in a way that quite defies the decencies of the season. The fact is, modest and shrinking as they seem to be, daisies are very hardy and hard-working small plants, which never miss an opportunity of pushing their way in the world ; and no doubt they have their reward, for probably no other flowering kind — except, perhaps, one or two grasses — have been half so successful in colonising the fields and hill-sides as these unobtrusive, wee things have been. In the spring, they are the very earliest plants to bloom ; and since the early flower catches the bee, they begin setting their seed before the other blossoms are well awake ; all through the summer and autumn they go on blooming unin- terruptedly; and even when winter comes, they are ready at a moment's notice to take advantage of any brief gleam of sunlight which may happen to occur, putting forth their pretty buds fearlessly, and alluring the last stray insects of the season to visit their tiny golden bells. Here in my hand I have grubbed up one entire 44 NATURE STUDIES. daisy-plant, root and all, with my cane ; and when one comes to look closely at its structure, the secret of its success in life is not difficult to decipher. In the first place, there are the leaves. These we seldom notice when we are examining a daisy, because they ^ire so very retiring and unobtrusive. They lie flat upon the ground, in a small, round, spreading rosette, pressed as tightly as possible against the soil beneath. That is one of the tricks by means of which the daisy secures itself a place in the world. It grows gene- rally in open pastures and commons covered with grass ; and as the grass tends always to raise its tall blades as high as possible, the daisy might easily be overshadowed by that powerful competitor. Now, there are two ways in which different plants living in such circumstances can avoid being elbowed out of •existence. One way is by sending up taller and bigger leaves than the grasses, so as to intercept the .air and sunlight ; and this is the plan adopted by such weeds as dock, burdock, coltsfoot, and some plantains. As a rule, however, such tactics can only be followed by plants which possess a reserve fund of food-stuffs laid by in their roots or stocks, for otherwise the young leaves would be choked and starved before they could grow high enough to overtop the competing grasses. Or, to put it more definitely, those kinds alone have succeeded in this way which happened to develope both large leaves and rich reserves of starch at one and the same time. The second plan is that followed by the daisy, the hoary plantain, and many A WINTER WEED. 45 other field-weeds. These plants have learnt to press their foliage closely down in a little circle upon the ground, so as to prevent any grasses from growing up around them and intercepting the sun and air. In other words, such individuals among them as happened to display this tendency, in a slight degree, survived the best; and among their descendants, such as carried it out further and further, spread most afield,, while such as fell short of the desired quality, got killed off young by neighbouring weeds. Thus, at last, the daisy acquired its present successful habit of growing close to the ground, and so checking com- petition in the bud, or, rather, in the very seedling. But why, it may be objected, do not all other plants do the same? The answer is, because all are not adapted for the same sort of life as the daisy. One- kind survives in virtue of one point of vantage, another kind survives in virtue of another. Tho English meadow plantains are three closely-allied types of weed, hardly differing from one another in any essential point ; yet each of them has solved this problem of foliage in a separate way. The great plantain sends up big, broad leaves on longish stalks, something like those of garden lettuce, which overtop most of its neighbours; the hoary plantain spreads a little tuft close to the earth, like the daisy ; and the ribwort plantain meets the grasses on their own ground, by reducing its leaves to mere long, thin, lance-like blades. In each case, the explanation must be accepted on its own merits, without prejudice to- 46 NATURE STUDIES. different explanations elsewhere. The forms of leaves, indeed, are among the most difficult problems of botany, and it must not be supposed that we can account for them all at once by a single simple and easy formula. One might as well ask why the rabbit is not as big as the red deer, or why the fox is smaller than the lion. Each fills its own niche in nature ; so each has been developed into exact correspondence with that particular niche and no other. And different means often subserve exactly the same end. The fleetness of the hare is produced by quite other adaptations than the fleetness of the stag; the foliage of the daisy succeeds by being compact and rounded, the foliage of the buttercup by being cut up into numerous small divergent segments. In short, whatever accidental habit happens to give a plant or animal any advantage in the struggle for existence is perpetuated in its descendants, and gradually perfected by natural selection, and thus the most diverse means often lead up in the long run to the same end. The reason why the daisy is able to send up buds and blossoms at a moment's notice seems equally clear. The buds are always lying by in readiness close to the little perennial tufted stock. I cut it down the middle with my pocket-knife, and see, in the centre of the tuft, there are two or three unopened flower-buds even now lurking unseen and waiting for their turn to appear. Practically speaking, the daisy is an evergreen, for it always has green leaves upon it all the year round; and these green leaves are per- petually engaged, summer andwinter, in manufacturing A WINTER WEED. 47 starch from the carbonic acid of the air, which starch is at once laid by in the root-stock to feed the young flowers when they are ready to sprout. So the moment a little warm weather arrives, the bud begins to start into life, and is supplied with food from the starch laid by in the root, as well as from the constant gains of the ever-busy leaves. All annual plants have to grow from the seed in a single season, and they have to produce a large number of leaves before they have digested food enough in these their ex- panded stomachs to feed the future flowers and seed ; so that they cannot begin blossoming till comparatively late in the season. But the daisy, being a perennial, with slightly starchy root and practically persistent foliage, gets the start of them from the beginning, so as to put forth its flowers at the earliest possible moment. And now let me look briefly at this flower itself. It is made up, as everybody knows, of two parts. The centre, or disk, is yellow, while the outer rays are white. But if one pulls it to pieces, one sees that the disk is really composed of many separate little golden bells, each one something like a harebell on a very small scale. The daisy head, in fact, is not one flower, but a whole lot of distinct flowers crowded together into a single truss. Taking one of the little central yellow bells in detail, I find that its petals are not separate, as in the buttercup, but are all united together into a long tube. The ancestors of the daisy had doubtless ages ago five distinct petals, like those of the buttercup; but at some time or other 48 NATURE STUDIES. these petals showed a tendency to coalesce, and as this tendency proved useful to the plant, by more certainly securing its fertilisation by insects, it rapidly grew through survival of the fittest into a fixed habit, not only of the daisy, but of all the great group of flowers to which it belongs. The reason why the tubular shape is more useful than the arrangement with five spreading petals becomes clear enough if we recollect that the insect has to thrust its proboscis down to the bottom of the tube, past the pollen - bearing stamens and the sensitive pistil, in order to- reach the tiny drop of honey concealed within. In doing so, a little of the pollen naturally adheres to his proboscis, and is then brushed off against the sensi- tive surface of the next blossom which he visits, so a* thus to impregnate and fertilise its seed. To this day, however, the daisy still retains a reminiscence of the distant period when it possessed five separate petals ; for each of the central florets has a van dyked edge of five points, these points being the last repre- sentatives of the original distinct flower leaves in its remote progenitors. The tubular arrangement is common to many flowers besides the daisy family ; but the daisies and their allies have carried their development one step further than the rest, for they have learnt to collect several tiny blossoms together into a single compact head, and thus to bid for the attention of insects far more powerfully than they could do in single display. More than that, in the daisy itself, and one or two A WINTER WEED. 49 others of its near relations, the outer florets of each liead have become flattened into long ornamental rays, so as to play the part of petals to the compound group. In this way they make the little bunch very noticeable to all passing insects. The ray florets, when closely examined, look like tubes split down one side and opened out, so as to produce as much show as possible. They are the attractive part of the flower-head, and they do little active work themselves, having no stamens and no pollen, but laying them- selves out mainly to look pretty alone. For this purpose they are coloured white, with pinky tips, instead of being yellow, like the central florets. Yet, of course, the whole plant is ultimately benefited by this arrangement, because the insects are thus induced to visit the entire little colony at once, and by carry- ing pollen from one floret to another, to fertilise the whole row of yellow bells then open. For if you look intently into a daisy, you will see that it does not open all over at the same time, but begins opening from the edge, and gradually proceeds towards the centre ; so that in most daisies you will find a row or two of over-blown florets outside, a row just open or opening half -way through, and a lot of unopened little buds in the very middle. Doubtless, this arrange- ment also conduces to the good of the plant, by ensuring the highest and best sort of cross-fertilisa- tion— that which is obtained by impregnating the blossoms of one individual with pollen brought from those of another. E 50 NATURE STUDIES. A POISONOUS LIZAIW. BT DR. ANDREW TTILSOX, F.R.S.E., F.L.S. THE possession of a poison-apparatus is by no means a common event in the animal world; although, in- deed, very diverse animals are possessed of offensive means of this kind. Low down in the animal scale we find the jelly-fishes, sea-anemones, and their neigh- bours, possessing these curious stinging organs called " thread-cells," the virulence of which many an un-> wary bather has experienced to his cost. Each thread- cell is really a minute bag, tensely filled with fluid,, and containing, coiled up in its interior, a thread or filament. When, from any cause — as by pressure,, for example — the cell is ruptured, the fluid escapes, and if the thread and fluid together come in contact with the tissues of any animal liable to be affected, the animal in question will be paralysed, or even killed. In this way the Hydra, or "fresh-water polype/' captures its prey; and even in the lower deeps of the animal world (as amongst the Infusoria, for example), these thread-cells appear to be represented.. Higher up in the animal series, we come upon the poison-apparatus of insects, carried in their tails, as also is the " sting " of the scorpion. The centipede's poison-fangs are situated, on the contrary, in its mouth. Amongst the shell-fish, or Molluscs, no poison- secretions occur. In fishes, as the lowest Vertebrates, A POISONOUS LIZAED. ^ we certainly know of one or two cases in which an approach to a poison-apparatus is found. The frogs and toads, " ugly" though they may be, are not yet "venomous/' Shakespeare notwithstanding. Acrid and irritating secretions may be poured out from the skin -glands of these animals. Such secretions are seen typically developed in the toads; but they are not 'poisonous/' in the common sense in which we use that term. It is in the class of reptiles that the venomous attains its full development. • Here, in the group of the snakes, we reach the acme of poison evolution. A typically poisonous snake, like the rattlesnake or viper, possesses two elongated and hollow "fangs/' borne on its upper jaw. These fangs are merely largely-developed teeth, and their hollow interiors each communicate by means of a canal with the poison gland. This gland, placed in front of and below the eye on each side, is merely a modified salivary gland, and corresponds to that gland in man known as the parotid, and which becomes enlarged in children suf- fering from "mumps." It is highly interesting to find that whilst the poison-secretion of a snake is merely permanently modified saliva, we know of cases among quadrupeds in which the fluid of the mouth becomes temporarily venomous. The case of the rabid dog is. the most familiar example of this fact; and it is curious to reflect on the similarity in nature which exists between the virus of animals so widely separated as are snakes and mammals. E 2 52 NATURE STUDIES. The class of lizards is well known to be related to that of snakes by many ties of structural kinship. Both are groups of the reptilian class, and we find cer- tain lizards (e.g., the harmless blind-worm of Britain,) which may be as destitute of legs as any snake. No lizard, until quite recently, was known to bo poisonous, or to possess any structures suggestive of the possession and manufacture of a poisonous secre- tion. Horrible, ungainly, and ugly as many lizards are, no fear of evil consequences could have been ex- perienced in handling them, and naturalists would have given a very decided negative to any inquiry respecting the existence of a poison-secretion in the lizard group. But as it is the unexpected which happens proverbially in political and social life, so zoological existence has been startled by the news that a truly poisonous lizard has at length been dis- covered. This reptile is named the Heloderma horridum, and hails from the neighbourhood of Puebla. It is, there- fore, a denizen of the New World, and has found its way to the reptile-house in the London Zoo' through the kindness of Sir John Lubbock. The traditions of the lizard are, it appears, unfavourable, if its Indian character is to be believed. The natives appear to regard it as a malignant deity, and are said to endea- vour to propitiate the supposed evil power by the offer of sacrifices to the lizard-god. When first brought to London, the reptile was regarded as an interesting example of a rare species of lizard. Like the rest of A POISONOUS LIZARD. 53 its brethren, it was believed to be thoroughly and completely harmless. True, stories had now and then been circulated by travellers in Mexico, that there existed in that country a lizard, or reptile of allied nature, whose bite was believed to be terribly fatal. But naturally enough, without evidence of the exist- ence of such an animal, naturalists relegated the story to the domain of legend and exaggeration. Without direct evidence of such a statement, no man of science, basing his views of lizard-nature on the exact knowledge to hand, would have hesitated in rejecting the story as, at least, improbable. Yet it is clear that the stories of the New World may have had an actual basis of fact; for the Hcloderma horridum has been, beyond doubt, proved to be poisonous in as high a degree as a cobra or a rattle- snake. At first the lizard was freely handled by those in charge at Regent's Park, and being a lizard, was re- garded as harmless. It was certainly dull and inactive, a result probably due to its long voyage and to the want of food. Thanks, however, to the examination of Dr. Giinther, of the British Museum, and to actual experiment, we now know that Heloderma will require in future to be classed among the deadly enemies of other animals. Examining its mouth, Dr. Giinther found that its teeth formed a literal series of poison- fangs. Each tooth, apparently, possesses a poison- gland ; and lizards, it may be added, are plentifully supplied with these organs as a rule. Experimenting 54 NATURE STUDIES. upon the virulence of the poison, Helodcrma was made to bite a frog and a guinea-pig. The frog died in one minute, and the guinea-pig in three. The virus re- quired to produce these effects must be of singularly acute and powerful nature. It is to be hoped that no case of human misadventure at the teeth of Helodcrma may happen. There can be no question, judging from the analogy of serpent-bite, that the poison of the lizard would affect man. The sacrifice of a guinea-pig and a frog may be, and most probably will be, cited by rabid anti-vivisectionists as a cruel experiment. Sensible persons will apply another term to the test whereby the virulence of the lizard was established, and humanity thereby placed on its guard. Forewarned is forearmed, whether we consider the case of a burglarious attack on our premises or the bite of a lizard. BIRDS WITH TEETH. BY THOS. FOSTER. IN the year 1861 a feather was found in a slab of lithographic stone from Solenhofen, which Hermann von Meyer assigned to an animal as yet not otherwise known, which he called Archceoptcryx lithographica. Later in the same year, a large portion of the skeleton of Archseopteryx was discovered in the same forma- tion. There were impressions of feathers radiating JillWS WITH TEETH. 55 fanwise from each of the fore-limbs. But Prof. Andreas Wagner, in a report to the Royal Academy of Sciences in Munich, expressed the opinion that the •creature was not a bird, but a reptile, whose natural covering presented a deceptive resemblance to feathers. He called it the Griplwsaurus, which (considering he had not seen the fossil remains) was very obliging on his part. Von Meyer, however, regarded the im- pressions as representing real feathers, belonging to the same animal as the feather he had already dis- •covered. The fossil was secured for the British Museum in 1862. It is contained in two slabs of Solenhofen limestone ; one representing the surface of tidal mud on which the bird lay at the time of its death, the other the layer deposited over the dead body. The lower slab shows the impressions of the tail, wings, and parts of the skeleton. The right shoulder-blade and upper arm (wing), as well as both the forearms, are well preserved. The head, the neck, and the backbone are wanting. Two of the digits of the wing (wing-fingers we may call them) are free, and armed with sharp claws or recurved spurs. The right lower limb is well preserved, consisting of the thigh-bone, the tibia or larger lower leg-bone, and the tarso-inetatarsal bones, or bones of the upper foot To the metatarsus, four toes are articulated, one hind- toe and three fore-toes, which are jointed as 'with birds, and armed with strong recurved claws. "The foot," says Mr. Woodward, from whose description the above has in the main been taken, " agrees well with 56 NATURE STUDIES. that of a true perching bird, but from the fanwise and rounded arrangement of the wing- feathers, it would appear to have been a bird of feeble flight/' Without entering further into the peculiarities of this creature, we note that while a few naturalists were doubtful as to its being really a bird, the majority were very confident that it was so. Professor Owen, in particular, pointed out that in one respect in which it differed most from modern birds it resembles the embryonic bird. Its tail-bones diminished gradually to the last, whereas in modern birds, the last vertebra of the tail is almost always the largest. But, said Owen, " All birds in their embryonic state exhibit the caudal vertebra distinct, and in part of the series [of embryonic changes] gradually decreasing in size to the pointed end one." The two-fingered and free condition of the wing-hand, that is of what corre- sponds to the hand in the bird's fore-limbs (which Owen pleasantly described as " the biunguiculate and less confluent condition of the manus"), he did not account for in the same way as a feature of an em- bryonic bird ; but in some modern species the forward wing-finger supports a claw, and the Screamer has two claws. ^11 who at that time examined the fossil agreed that in all probability the creature had a beak like a bird. But Mr. John Evans noticed somewhat later (besides a rounded mass which he took for part of the brain- pan, with a cast of the brain) what he regarded as a fossil jaw, on the slab on which lies the fossil body of BIRDS WITH TEETH. 57 the bird. It had been supposed to be tlie beak of Archaeopteryx, but " great was iny surprise," writes Mr. Evans, " when I detected along its right-hand margin, towards the apex, the distinct impression in the slab of four teeth, still attached to it. The teeth themselves remain adhering to the counterpart, and are easily recognised by the lustre of their enamel." The teeth are thus described by Mr. Woodward : " The three which remain in a vertical position with regard to the jaw are about one-tenth of an inch long, and at intervals of about one-fifth of an inch. They consist of a slightly tapering, flattened, enamelled crown, about a twenty-fifth of an inch in width, and obtusely pointed, set upon what is apparently a more bony base, which widens out suddenly into a semi- elliptical form, so that at the line of attachment to the jaw the base of one tooth comes in contact with that of the next. So sudden and extensive is this widening of the base, that at first it gave me the impression that the teeth were tricuspidate, with the middle cusp far longer than the others. The front tooth of the four, which slopes forward from the rest, and is rather smaller than the others, shows little, if any, similar enlargement of its base. Of the fifth, which lies across the base of the foremost of the four, only a part is visible. There appears to be a well - defined line at the base of the teeth along their junction with the jaw, but I can offer no opinion as to the method of their attachment." It seemed so unlikely when the above description 58 NATURE STUDIES. was written that a jaw armed with teeth could belong to a creature manifestly bird-like, that many supposed the jaw belonged to some fish, though the jaws and teeth of fossil fishes from the same bed were found to be unlike this. Hermann von Meyer, referring to the drawings sent to him by Mr. Woodward, said that he knew of no teeth of the kind in the litho- graphic stone ; nor were the teeth like those of Ptero- •dactyles (the great reptiles with bat-like wings) . ' ' An -arming of the jaw with teeth would contradict the view of the Archgeopteryx being a bird or an em- bryonic1 form of bird. But, after all," he proceeds, fins) ; and that their bodies are covered with scales. If we add to these facts, the declaration that fishes possess a heart consisting of only two chambers, we shall have nearly completed our definition of the fish- type ; and we might add, lastly, that the nostrils in fishes are typically closed pockets, and do not, as in higher animals, open backwards into the mouth. It is necessary for our present purpose to point out that most fishes possess a singular sac or bag, lying just beneath the spine, and called the swimming- bladder, air-bladder, or sound. From the " sound " of the sturgeon we obtain isinglass ; and in a herring, for example, the " sound " may be seen as a silvery, glistening bag, which is removable along with the other organs of the fish when it is " gutted." This bag contains gas, and its use is that of serving to alter the specific gravity of the fish— that is, to render (by compression or expansion of the gas) the body of the fish heavier or lighter than the surrounding water. It thus enables its possessor to readily rise or sink in the medium in which it lives. The air-bladders of all fishes, as Dr. Grunther tells us, at first open into their digestive systems by means of a tube or duct. But IDS NATURE STUDIES. in many fishes this tube disappears, leaving the air- bladder a closed sac (as in the cod) ; or the duct may persist, and place the sound in communication with the digestive tract, as in the sturgeon or herring. Again, the air-bladder maybe a simple and single sac; -or it may be variously divided, and its interior may be smooth or may be divided into cells. We shall pre- sently see that in the mud-fishes and the " Jeevine," this structure assumes a form and function for which its variations in common fishes in some measure prepare us. Turning now to the last-named fishes (Lepidosiren and Ceratodus), we discover that their fish-characters exist on the very surface of things. Their blood is cold; their bodies are scaly; they have fins and fin- rays ; and above all, they possess gills existing in the sides of the neck, and in which, so long as they swim in the water, their blood is purified. But here the fish-characters end. Another aspect of the mud- fishes and the barramunda reveals characters which startle us as being not those of fishes, but those of frogs ; and frogs, toads, and newts form, as every one knows, the second higher class of vertebrates, that of the Amphibia. Firstly, then, the Lepidosiren possesses a heart, which is not that of a fish, but modelled 011 the type of the frog or reptile heart. Instead of being two- chambered, it is three-chambered ; and no other fish save itself possesses such an advance on the ordinary type of fish-heart. But, secondly, their " paired fins," which represent in all fishes the " limbs " of higher FOUND LINKS. animals, resemble — in the mud-fishes at least — rudi- mentary limbs. Then the nostrils, thirdly, open into- the mouth — a character agreeing with frogs and all higher vertebrates, but possessed by one other fish- group only- — the low hag-fishes, which are poor rela- tions of the lampreys. These characters, then, are the characters of frogs, and not of fishes. But a far more interesting likeness to the frogs and higher ver- tebrates yet remains for notice. The " air-bladder" of the mud-fish and of the " Jeevine " alters wonder- fully, both in form and function, from its nature in other fishes. It becomes divided in two, and it opens into their throat by a windpipe, at the top of which is a "glottis/' corresponding to part of our own- organ of voice. Furthermore, it is divided internally into cells — in a word, the air-bladder of the mud-fish and its neighbour has become a lung. But this won- derful transformation is not quite ended with the recital of the altered structure of the air-bladder in these fishes. A lung is an organ which not merely receives blood in an impure state, but which, as in ourselves, returns that blood pure to the heart for re- circulation through the body. If, therefore, the ' f lung " of the fish is to be accounted a true " lung,"" we should be able to show that it performs the func- tions and discharges the duties of an organ of breathing. Now the life of these fishes exhibits exactly the peculiarities which demand the exercise of an air- breathing organ like a lung. The mud-fishes inhabit 1 10 NATURE STUDIES their native rivers during the wet season ; but when the dry season approaches, they bury themselves in the mud, and lie there, baked as in a kind of mud-pie, until the return of the persistent rains. During this land-existence, their " lungs " come into play. So long as they live in their native waters, they breathe by their gills like ordinary fishes ; but, ensconced in the mud, they breathe air directly from the atmo- sphere, like ourselves. The air-bladder purifies the blood, which the heart pumps into its vessels, and from the " lungs " the purified blood is returned to the heart. The fish is thus truly a " double-breather "; it exhibits in itself the combination of the frog and the fish. Dr. Giinther tells us that whilst the mud-fishes remain in the " torpid state of existence, the clay- balls containing them are frequently dug out, and, if the capsules are not broken, the fishes im- bedded in them can be transported to Europe, and released by being immersed in slightly tepid water/' The " Jeevine," with its similar ' ' lung," is said to leave the Australian rivers at night, and to waddle its way to the marshes and swamps, there to feed upon the vegetable matter that forms its staple food. In the nocturnal journeyings of the fish we can readily perceive the utility of the " lung." It may lastly be remarked that other fishes are known to leave the water and to exist for a time on land. The climbing perch of India, and the Ophio- cephali, also of India, illustrate such fishes; but in FOUND LINKS. m these forms the breathing in air is contrived in a different fashion from that process in the mud-fishes, and has no connexion with any " lung." Let us now reflect that a frog itself begins life as a fish. The " tadpole " has gills and a fish-heart, whilst it has no lungs. Ultimately it acquires lungs and loses gills and tail as its mature shape is attained. Summing up these plain facts of zoology, I think it is not difficult to see that in the mud-fishes and "Jeevine" we find a "link" between the lower water-living fishes and the air-breathing frogs. If we suppose that a form like the mud-fish could rid itself of its gills when it became adult, and that it could throw off the scales of the fish, and develop the limbs of the frog, we might figure to ourselves the ascent of the frog-type from the fish-type. There is nothing more wonderful or impossible in this idea than in the veritable fact that every frog is at first a fish, then a tailed newt, and only ultimately becomes the amphibian. Anyhow, one fact seems clear enough, that fishes and frogs — two utterly distinct classes — are ' ' linked " by the mud-fishes and " Jeevine " ; and this single fact in itself supports powerfully, in a rational view of matters, the theory that the air-breathing tribes of animals sprang origin- ally from water-living forms. We shall see in future papers that f ' links " even of stranger kind unite classes of animals as dissimilar as the fishes and the frogs. 112 NATURE STUDIES. PART II.— FROGS AND TADPOLES. HAVING in my previous paper tried to show that the mud-fishes were veritable links between the fish-class and the frog-class, we may now turn to the history of the latter group itself, by way of showing how, within its own limits, gaps and gulfs have been bridged in nature's own way. The history of a frog is in itself an interesting study. It begins life as a tadpole, and lives, as most readers know, a perfectly fish-like existence. It is fish-like in form ; its heart is two- chambered, and thus resembles that of the fish, and it breathes at first by outside gills. By-and-bye a broad fold grows over the gills, and ultimately covers them ; whilst internal gills grow from the gill-arches. Meanwhile, the tadpole has been cropping the water- weeds by means of the horny jaws with which it is provided, and has been digesting its food within the long and spiral intestines which is the right and heri- tage of the vegetable feeder. Soon, however, the hind legs, which in the frogs and toads are the first to appear, are developed ; and these are in turn suc- ceeded by the front limbs. Lungs begin also to grow, as all lungs do, namely, in the form of two sacs or bags from the hinder or lower wall of the gullet. At this stage, the likeness of the frog to the fish has disappeared, and it closely resembles one of the common tailed "efts" or newts, which are familiar •denizens of our ponds and pools. If it had retained FOUND LINKS. . U3 its outside gills after its legs had become developed, the young frog would have exactly resembled that curious creature, the Proteus — found only in under- ground caves in Central Europe — or the curious Axolotl of North America. But the ways of frog- development do not permit it to remain in the guise and likeness of its eft-cousins. Whilst its lungs have been undergoing development, the heart has been approaching that of the frog- type, which possesses a three-chambered heart, as already observed. Then, as development is completed, the tail shrivels. Grow- ing " small by degrees," it is represented in the adult frog by a mere rudiment ; and, as the oblitera- tion of the tail takes place, the young frog leaves the water and assumes the habits of a land-existence; breathing by lungs alone in its adult state, and exchanging, moreover, the vegetarian tastes of its infancy, for an insect dietary in after-life. Now, the history of a frog is beset with questions of interest for the earnest mind that studies even its superficial features. Why, firstly, should a frog pass through these changes at all? is a very pertinent inquiry; and if this be capable of being answered, why, secondly, should its development run in the lines sketched out ? If we start with the idea that animals and plants were simply " created " as we find them — and that view of matters is, of course, not yet displaced in unscientific circles — then, so far as I can see, no explanation whatever of the frog's develop- ment can be offered. " It is so, because it is so " — i II4 NATURE STUDIES. such is the logical dead- wall that awaits the student who turns to the " special creation " theory for an explanation. There is no accounting for a super- natural ^creative fiat ; we cannot give reasons for a "special creation;" in a word, we must, on this theory of nature, simply accept the fact of the frog's existence, and have done with it. But there exists the alternative idea of evolution and descent. What if it be admitted that one species or group of animals arises by natural variation and descent from another group ? What if in the frog's development we are led to see a panorama — a moving picture, of the descent of its race? The reasonableness of evolution may thus, I think, become very apparent ; contrariwise, I know of no other rational explanation of the frog's tadpole-stage, and its subsequent development. What evolution, then, says is this : the frog is, at first, a fish-like, gill-breathing tadpole, with a fish- heart, because its earliest ancestor was a fish ; and it is interesting to note that the young of some well- known fishes (e.g., dog-fishes) breathe by outside gills. I have a beautiful specimen of two of these young fishes with their outside gills in my museum. Furthermore, the resemblances of the tadpole to the type of some primitive fish do not end with its outside aspect. Mr. F. M. Balfour says the anatomy of the tadpole points to its relations with the living lam- preys, which, as every naturalist admits, must be fishes of a very ancient type. But, secondly, the tailed tadpole becomes four-legged, and it thus FOUND LINKS. II5 resembles, as we have seen, a newt or effc. The reason of the newt- stage is evident if we assume that the frog-stage was attained through a newt-stage. Abbreviate the tail of the newt, elongate its hind legs, and with a few other modifications, we find the higher frog to be represented. For the frog, let it be remembered, is the highest type of its class ; and the evolutionist's contention is that it has ascended to that place and dignity by successively rising from fish to newt, and from newt to frog. The reasons for the "metamorphosis" of the frog are clear enough, on the principle that development repeats descent — not always clearly, it is true, and with much modification, but still plainly enough to reveal the ways of the " becoming " of the animal world. If it is asked, Why do not all animals show their descent as clearly as does the frog ? I reply, because their development has been modified. But it is none the less true that in the development of all animals we see glimpses of the lines of their genealogy. The great difference between a frog's development (or that of an insect or crustacean which also undergoes " metamorphosis ") and that of, say, a fish which hatches directly from the egg, consists simply in the fact that the frog's development is mostly passed outside the egg, whilst the fish developes within the egg. But it is interesting to note that the frog in itself thus serves to link together groups of its own class. Thus its own development — not to speak of that of i 2 Il6 NATURE STUDIES. the newts themselves — teaclies us that the newts have arisen from the fish- stock, and that they represent a lower phase of amphibian life than do the frogs and toads with their shortened tails. Indeed, the study of the frog itself not merely proves to us its own evolution, but demonstrates an orderly sequence in the descent of its class — a sequence wherein the newt-type followed the fish, and wherein the frog- type, in turn, was evolved from the newt. That some such explanation — or, at least, an ex- planation based on similar grounds — is the only feasible method of explaining the metamorphosis of a frog, may be stoutly maintained against all comers. Evolutionists may differ regarding the exact lines along which the descent proceeded. They do not differ regarding the main facts at issue, namely, that fishes are linked to frogs in more ways than one, and that the history of the frog-race, rightly viewed, is really a connecting-thread on which the various forms of living and extinct members of its class may be strung. In my next paper, I shall endeavour to trace the f ' links " which bind birds to reptiles. PART III.— BIEDS AND REPTILES. THERE are no two classes of animals between which exists a greater dissimilarity than birds and reptiles. The active organisation of the one and the sluggish ways of the other, the warm blood of the former and the cold blood of the latter, are points in the popular FOUND LINKS. 117 natural history of the two groups which technical zoology has bufc emphasised in its turn. Yet the scientific examination of these beings reveals bonds of connexion between them, all unsuspected by the ordinary reader, and demonstrates further, in the most suggestive fashion, that the likeness to be pre- sently alluded to must possess some origin and meaning. That origin, evolution maintains, is tf descent " from a common stock ; the meaning is that seen throughout all similar series of likenesses, namely, the natural result of the laws of animal development. In the case of birds and reptiles, the same considerations appeal to us which I have already indicated as existent in the details of frog-develop- ment. Either the likenesses science discovers between apparently distinct groups of animals are explicable, or they are not explicable. If the former, then science declares, with unanimous voice, that the like- nesses are due to common descent, as the unlikenesses are due to the variations and modifications produced during the evolution of the race. If, on the other hand, the likenesses are inexplicable — as I hold them to be on any other theory save that of evolution — then must mankind fold their hands in the acknow- ledgment of an ignorance that might legitimately, by its avowal, close the door to astronomical research, to geological work, and to scientific investigation of every kind. I am led to make these remarks because several correspondents of Knowledge have remarked to the IlS NATUEE STUDIES. editor, that because likenesses can be proved to exist between two different groups of animals in their young state, they do not understand why the evolutionist should lay such stress upon these facts as proving his contentions. One correspondent, for instance, says that he cannot admit that because one thing is like another, the two things must stand in the relation of parent and offspring. I reply, likeness does not necessarily imply similarity of origin, but, on the other hand, it is one of the proofs of such similarity. If likeness is to be denied its place as a proof of common origin — apart from other and equally powerful proofs known to biologists — what guarantee should we possess that unlikeness means dissimilarity ? That the likeness of child to parent is a natural likeness, every one must admit. The reasons are clear enough, and they derive their force from the fact that the latter begets the former. I hold that the likenesses existent — especially in the early stages of develop- ment— between different groups, are to be judged on the same basis, namely that of heredity. A manifest resemblance in the young frog to a fish is, I repeat, inexplicable, equally on scientific principles and on common-sense grounds, unless on the hypothesis that some bond of relationship connects the two. The duty of disproving this idea rests with those who deny evolution. Until we receive a fuller and more likely explanation of such likenesses as those we are at pre- sent discussing, we are entitled to hold to the only theory, which, so far as I know, satisfies the require- FOUND LINKS. 119 merits of a good hypothesis — these requirements being that it explains all the facts and is contrary to none. This end the theory of evolution attains in explaining both the likenesses and the dissimilarities of living nature. Returning, after this needful digression, to the case of birds and reptiles, let us firstly note the structural points in which these classes agree. To begin with, the skull of both is joined to the spine by one bony process or condyle. There are two of these processes in frogs and their neighbours, and a similar number in quadrupeds, including man. Then, secondly, the lower jaw of a reptile agrees with that of a bird in its •compound nature. The jaw, instead of being simple and composed of two simple halves (as in quadrupeds), consists in birds and reptiles of from eight to twelve distinct pieces, which are amalgamated to form one bone. Furthermore, whilst the quadruped's lower jaw is joined directly, and of itself, to the skull, that of the bird and reptile is attached to the skull through the medium of a distinct bone, which is named the quadrate bone. Curiously enough, this bone in the quadruped is pushed upwards into the middle of the skull in the course of development, and becomes one of the three small bones (malleus) of the internal ear. Again, reptiles and birds agree in possessing lungs alone as their breathing organs. No gills are de- veloped (as in frogs and fishes) at any period of reptile or bird-life, although both, like quadrupeds, possess gill-clefts in the neck in early life. These "gill- 120 NATCEE STUDIES. clefts," seen in the early life of man himself, are to be viewed as feeble survivals of the aquatic ancestry from which, according to evolution, all Vertebrate animals have sprung. Furthermore, instead of the ankle-joint (as in man and quadrupeds) being situated between the end of the leg, so to speak, and the beginning of the ankle-bones, this joint in reptiles and birds exists in the middle of the ankle-bones themselves. This curious feature will be farther alluded to later on. The technical naturalist would enumerate other points of agreement between birds and reptiles, but sufficient has been said to show the close affinities which lie just beneath the surface of their organisa- tion. Their differences, however, are also of pro- nounced type. The causes to which in the far-back past the evolutionist conceives the likeness between these animals to be due, have operated, through variation, at a less remote period, to produce the divergent lines of development. Thus we discover that birds are warm-blooded, whilst reptiles possess cold blood; the bird's feathers are unknown in the reptile-world; and the perfect heart and circulation of the bird — similar to that of man — are also unrepre- sented in reptiles. Crocodiles, which possess a four-chambered heart, like birds and quadrupeds, nevertheless exhibit the same imperfect and " mixed'* circulation seen equally in frogs and reptiles. Tho lungs of birds are of " open " structure, and part of the air inspired passes through the lungs to fill certain FOUND LINKS. 121 " air sacs " in tlie bird's body, and also fills the interior of the bones in most birds. Such a dis- tribution of air in the bird's body is evidently adapted for the exigencies of flight. .On the whole, then, with certain well-marked likenesses — which, bo it observed, evolution accounts for on the idea of a common origin — the classes of birds and reptiles are demarcated from one another by certain highly- distinctive characters. The dissimilarities on the hypothesis of evolution are due to variation and modification ; but, if this idea be correct, can we show the stages through which the variation had led these two groups ? In other words, have the ' ' links " which should hypothetically connect them, any existence whatever ? Such an inquiry would have been answered in the negative only a few- years ago; but, thanks to recent research, we are now enabled, satisfactorily enough, to bridge the gulf between birds and reptiles, and in a measure to reconstruct the pedigree of these curious races. To render my remarks clear, ifc may be well at this stage to show in a tabular form the relative positions of the rock-formations with which we shall have to deal. Placed in the order in which they occur in the- earth's crust, the rocks in question lie thus : — f Eecent. Tertiary ) Pliocene. Hocks. } Miocene. Eocene. Trias. 122 NATURE STUDIES. The meaning of this table becomes clear, if it be borne in mind that the rocks as here noted are divided into the older Secondaries and the newer Tertiaries. The Eocene in turn is the oldest (or lowest) series of the Tertiary rocks, as the Trias is the oldest of the Secondary rocks. The fossil remains of birds are few and far between, and this for the reason pointed out by Lyell — namely, that the body of a bird falling into water, prior to its entombment in the deposits which form the rocks of the future, would float, and would afford a likely object of prey to other animals; thus escaping the chances of preservation. For long, fossil birds were regarded as limited to the Tertiary rocks ; but we now know of their existence in the Chalk, or Cretaceous period ; and we have also obtained fossil specimens from the rocks immediately preceding the Chalk in time, namely the Oolitic or Jurassic Period. It is almost needless to remark that the bird- remains of the Tertiary rocks, as a rule, resemble closely the birds of our own day. In this light they only testify to the age of some of our existing groups of birds, and do not directly support the theory of evolution, whilst, of course, they do not in any way negative it. But in the deposits of the London clay of Sheppey, belonging to the Eocene (Tertiary) period of geology, the remains of a bird, belonging apparently to the swimmers, were discovered. This form was named Odontopteryx by Professor Owen, and its remarkable jaw-armature at once attracted the FOUND LINKS. 123 notice of naturalists. No existing bird has teeth; and no bird possesses any structures approaching teeth in function — save, perhaps, such birds as the Mergansers, in which the horny margin of the jaw is cut into a series of projections, adapted for retaining a secure hold of the finny prey on which these birds subsist. But in the Odontopieryx, the jaws were beset with strong bony processes, which, though resembling teeth in appearance, nevertheless are mere projections of bone — for, as most readers know, teeth are not of bony nature, but possess a special and distinct struc- ture of their own. Nevertheless, the fact of this extinct bird of the Eocene rocks possessing toothed projections of its jaws, serves to link it, in the opinion of naturalists, to the reptile hosts ; for teeth are as stable and characteristic possessions of the reptile class as their absence is a natural feature of existing birds. Backwards in time, and in the course of the geo- logical aeons, we find the Cretaceous or Chalk rocks. To the naturalist these deposits have yielded a rich and suggestive harvest of bird fossils, which, in their approximations to the reptiles, certainly serve as " found links" in more ways than one. In the Chalk rocks of North America we discover the remains of 1 ' toothed birds," whose teeth in every respect agree with the structures of that name, and are not mere bony projections, as in the old swimmer of the London clay. The curious Hesperornis (see p. 60) and its neighbours the Iclitliyornis and Apatornis, thanks 124 NATURE STUDIES. to the exertions of Professor Marsh, appear before us as veritable links, connecting the birds and reptiles in respect of their teeth, as well as in other features of their economy. Hesperornis stood at least five feet high, and in respect of its bony framework exhibits a close alliance with the grebes of our own day. But, strange to say, Hesperornis wants one marked peculiarity of other birds (save the ostrich group), namely, the prominent " keel" or bony ridge on the breast-bone, to which the wing-muscles of birds are attached. The wings were certainly of rudimentary character, but this is a feature we see exemplified in the auks and penguins of our own day; and it is probable that the tail of this great diver of the chalk seas was unusually mobile, and adapted possibly to serve as a rudder. The reptile characters crop out, however, most clearly in the teeth of this bird. There were no teeth in the front of the upper jaw, and presumably this region was covered with a horny beak. The teeth themselves are curved struc- tures ; but they are set in a common groove, and not lodged each in a socket, as is commonly the case in higher animals. In living reptiles themselves, it may be added, the teeth, save in crocodiles, are not implanted in sockets. Thus, in serpents and lizards the teeth are simply united by bony union to the bones which bear them; but certain extinct lizards- had socket-fastened teeth, and the giant fossil reptiles (Ichthyosaurus, &c.) of the Lias, Oolite, and Chalk, possessed teeth which likewise arose from sockets in FOUND LINKS. 125 the jaws. In so far as Hesperornis is concerned, it removes the bird-class, on the face o£ things, a step nearer to the reptile hosts. Formerly, part of the naturalist's definition of a bird was included in the declaration that teeth were wanting. Now, the defi- nition requires stretching, to include a character which is shared in by certain reptiles, just as others, represented by tortoises and turtles, imitate the tooth- less condition of existing birds. But the Ichthyornis of the Chalk is even a more remarkable bird-fossil than' Hesperornis. For the teeth of the former are implanted in distinct sockets, whilst its breastbone had a keel, and its wings are of large size, and indicate the possession of bird-habits, united to structures of reptilian kind. But more peculiar still, as a departure from bird- characters was the nature of its vertebrae or the joints of the spine ; for Ichthyornis possessed vertebras, which, like those of the fishes and of extinct reptiles, were hollow at either end. Such a feature must naturally be made much of in estimating the relationship of this old bird to the reptilian hosts. The size of Ichthyornis was that of a pigeon. Preceding these birds in time comes the ArcJice- opteryx of the Upper Oolite deposits of Solenhofen, in Bavaria. Here the reptile-characters increase in number as becomes the older nature of their possessor. A recently -procured specimen of this bird enabled a zoological authority to declare that it was certainly not wholly a bird, and as certainly not wholly reptile 126 NATURE STUDIES. in its nature, but a strict link between these classes. For, firstly, it has the tail of a lizard, that is, the tail is long and jointed, and has no plough-share bone, as in other birds (Fig. 2, B, I) . Secondly, the bones of its palm were not joined together as in all other birds, whilst at least two of its fingers appear to have been provided with claws, a feature of exact reptilian nature. A Fig. 2.— A. Hinti leg of bird ; B. Tail bones of bird. Then it likewise has been ascertained, by the discovery of the recent specimen already referred to, that this old bird of the Oolite possessed teeth. Judged fairly, then, Archaeopteryx is, at the very least, as much a reptile as a bird. Its shoulder and fore-limb (or wing) are decidedly those of a reptile, whilst its hind limbs are bird-like in nature. The facts that such a race FOUND LINKS. I2/ of animals once existed, and that they lived at a period when, presumably, the bird-race was under- going its evolution from the reptilian confines, may,, in the eyes of any unprejudiced thinker, serve as clear evidences that the common prigin of birds and reptiles is matter, not of speculation, but of scientific demonstration. I have shown, thus, cursorily, the evidences sup- porting the contention that if, standing within the bird-class, we look for reptilian features within its limits, we are not disappointed in our search. But on the reptilian side of things there are also evidences to be found of the community of type from which the birds and reptiles of to-day have sprung. It takes but a slight acquaintance with zoology to discover that the curious lizard, Hatteria (or Sphenodon) , of New Zealand, as befits the curious history of its native country, brings us face to face with characters of abnormal kind, from the reptilian view of matters, at least. For this lizard has ribs which are decidedly those of bird-type, and, moreover, it has the same hollow- ended vertebras seen in the fossil-bird Ichthy- ornis. In other points of its structure as well, Hatteria seems to represent a primitive type of reptile, pre- sumably indicating that stage in the evolution of the two classes wherein certain characters of the bird had already begun to be developed in the common ancestors of these groups. The flying reptiles (Pterodactyls) (Fig. 3) of tthe Lias, Oolite, and Chalk, teach us that as the pure 128 NATURE STUDIES. reptile thus acquired powers of flight, the develop- ment of flight in the bird-stock, which was evolved from the reptile, or conjointly with it, need cause us no surprise. The Pterodactyls possessed the outermost finger {seen in the illustration) enormously elongated, and •adapted to form the chief support of a wing-membrane Fig. 3.— A. Skeleton of Pterodactyl ; B. Restoration of Pterodactyl. which extended along the sides of the body and between the hind limbs and tail also, as shown in B, Fig. 3. It may be added that these reptiles had a keel on the b reastbone like most living and extinct birds, and whilst in some species the teeth were developed, in others the jaws appear to have been FOUND LINKS. 129 toothless, and to have been sheathed in horn like those of birds. But these reptiles are not " links." They stand, not between birds and reptiles, but at the end of their own side-branch of the great tree of animal life. Still, from the reptile-side, it may lastly be shown that the " found links " connecting them with birds — it may be, of course, in different lines from those indicated by Archsoopteryx and its neighbours — Fig. 4. — Compsognathus (restored in outline). already find a place in the geological museum. In those curious reptiles, of which Compsognathus (Fig. 4) is the best known example, the characters of birds and reptiles were united in a literally surprising degree. Imagine a reptile possessing a swan-like neck, with toothed and bird-like jaws; suppose, further, that this animal had very rudimentary front limbs, and that it walked on its two hind limbs like a bird, K. 130 NATURE STUDIES. and we may conceive that this Compsognathus, tad it been feathered, would have at least appeared to resemble a bird much more nearly than a reptile. But a still stronger piece of evidence in favour of its bird-relationship awaits the naturalist when he discovers that the hind limbs of these curious reptiles are, in respect of structure, midway and between those of birds and reptiles. If we examine the hind limb of a bird (Fig. 5, A), we notice that the upper half of the ankle ( A s, C a) unites with the shin-bone, or leg (T) ; and as the lower half of the ankle joins the instep (1), the ankle-joint thus exists in the middle of the ankle-bones, and the lower ankle and instep-bones form a single bone (m) by their union. In Fig. 2 the hind limb of the bird is also seen, e being the single bone formed by the union of ankle and instep-bones. In the reptile's limb (C), the ankle-joint, as a rule, opens between the divided ankle-bones; but the instep- bones (C; i. ii. iii. iv.) are not united either to one another, or to the neighbouring ankle-bones. Now it is extremely interesting to discover that the hind limb of Compsognathus and its allies (B) is exactly intermediate between birds and reptiles. Here, the leg bones resemble those of birds in shape. The chief ankle-bone (A s) exactly corresponds with that of a bird ; and, as in birds, this bone becomes united to the lower end of the leg. But lastly, as if to show the intermediate nature of the limb, the instep-bone (I — iv.) remains free, and the leg of Compsognathus is thus practically halfway between that of the bird and FOUND LINKS. 13 r reptile. Thus, as in birds, the upper part of the ankle is united to the leg; but, unlike birds and like reptiles, the Compsognathus had the lower part of the ankle free, and not united with the instep. In a word, the hind limb of this old reptile resembles the condition of the limb in the chick before hatching, 1 32 NATURE STUDIES. and ifc may thus represent that stage in the evolution of the bird-type wherein the type of limb common to the primitive stock. was being gradually modified into- the more consolidated limb of the bird. Thus to-day, there exists a series of forms, detached and isolated, perhaps, but still eloquent enough in their declaration of the existence in past epochs of" animals which belong to no one class as defined by us- to-day, and which further stand intermediate between existent classes of living beings. The existence of these "links," to argue backwards, is inexplicable,, save on the theory of evolution, or 011 that of the production of ' ' freaks " by nature ; and this last idea, I apprehend, is put out of court, by every considera- tion worthy the name of scientific thought. PART IV.— THE LOWEST QUADRUPEDS. The quadrupeds l — or Mammals, as they are techni- cally called — form an important group of animals, not merely because in structure they represent the per- fection of the animal world, but because they stand at the head of the animal creation, apparently separate and distinct from all other and lower classes. The 1 A correspondent, " J. Fisher, M.D.," in a letter addressed to the Editor of Knowledge, remarks that the names " Quadrupeds " and " Mammals," used by me as synonymous terms (and, I may add, in strict accordance with natural history usage), are apt to convey what he is pleased to call an " erroneous impression." He remarks that the whale is a " Mammal," but not a " Quadruped '» • — meaning, of course, that a whale has not four legs. Dr. Fisher FOUND LINKS. -distinctive nature of the quadrupeds, in fact, has been tacitly acknowledged in zoology in the systems of •classification, which themselves are mere expressions of the various relationships of the classified beings. For, whilst the fishes and frogs have been united to form a province of Vertebrate animals, and whilst reptiles may, perhaps, have heard the remark that a good deal in this world depends upon one's point of view ; and his point of view happens in this case not to be mine. I carefully explained that I used the terms " Quadruped " and " Mammal," as convertible names, and this for the reason that in zoology — as, indeed, in every-day life — the names are so employed. Has Dr. Fisher ever heard of a frog (one of his examples) being called a " Quadruped," in the same breath with an ox ? And does he not know that a whale possesses all the essential characters of quadruped-life which he himself rejoices in the possession of? As to a whale not pos- sessing four limbs, perhaps Dr. Fisher, not being a zoologist, is not aware that in some whales (e.g. the whalebone genus, or Balccna^) there are actual representatives, not merely of the haunch-bones, but of the thighs as well. Hence, a whale may claim to be a quadruped, even although its hind-limbs are rudimentary. Dr. Fisher's somewhat querulous objections are overruled by the fact, -that, as I started by denning " Quadrupeds " and " Mammals " as being one and the same, the scientific meaning (and, as I main- tain, the popular meaning also) of these terms is not likely to be mistaken by any reader of ordinary intelligence. It is true, as Dr. Fisher remarks, that in many mammals the clavicles, or collar- bones, are wanting, just as these bones are absent in some mem- bers of an order (e.g. rodents) and present in others ; or, as is the case with the guinea-pigs and rabbits, the clavicles may be want- ing at birth, and become developed later. What I indicated in my paper was the typical condition of the quadruped shoulder. If Dr. Fisher maintains that it is more typical for a quadruped to want collar-bones than to possess them, that is his affair. He 'is not likely to find any comparative anatomist to agree with him. 134 NATURE STUDIES. and birds have also been arranged in one chief group by reason of their affinities, the quadrupeds have been made to form a province by themselves. The hairy nature of the body-covering, the nourishment of the young by means of milk, the fact that the young are born alive, and many other characters well known in popular zoology, attest the distinctive nature of the highest group of animals. But whilst these statements cannot be questioned, it must not be imagined that the quadrupeds are thereby entirely separated from all other animals. On the contrary, they possess their own affinities with lower forms, such as evolution pre-supposes, and such, indeed, as that theory of nature demands. The lowest mammals, to begin with, are by no means like the higher quadrupeds; and it is in the lowest confines of the class, as we shall presently see, that the approach to lower animals is made. The warmth of blood so characteristic of quadrupeds has already made its appearance in the birds, and although the exact origin of the mammals is yet a matter of doubt, it seems pretty clear that the root-stock of the class to which man himself belongs, may be sought for in some common territory whence, from a half-bird type, the lowest quadrupeds arose, or whence the mammals on the one side, and birds and reptiles on the other, have independently arisen. Such a conclusion seems to be that at present supported by facts as they stand ; and although further research may modify this view, there will still exist the demand for the links FOUND LINKS 135 that bind the quadrupeds to their lower Vertebrate neighbours. There can exist, at least, no doubt of the remark- able likeness which the lowest quadrupeds present to the bird and reptile groups. To understand thoroughly the zoological aspects of the matter, I may remind the reader that the class of mammals is very sharply split into two main divisions. These, to avoid technicalities, we may term Higher and Lower Mammals. The former group includes forms ranging from man down- wards through the apes, bats, rodents, and hoofed quadrupeds, to the whales, sloths, anteaters, and their Fig. 6.— Ornithorhynclms, or " Duck-billed Water-mole of Australia " (showing the " bill " and webbed feet). kith and kin. These animals are distinguished by the higher brain-structure and by the general possession of all the typical characters of quadrupeds. The Lower Mammals are the Ornithorhynchus, or " Duck- billed Water-mole" of Australia (Fig. 6), and its neighbours the Echidnas or " Porcupine Ant-eaters " of Australia; these two genera forming the lowest order (Monotrcmata) of all. A little above them, but still shut off from the higher ranks of the class, are 136 NATURE STUDIES. the kangaroos, wombats, phalangers, &c. — in a word, the whole of the native population of Australia (along with the New World opossums), forming the order of Marsupial-id, or that of the "pouched" quadrupeds. In Fig. 7 is represented the pelvis or haunch-bones of a kangaroo. At a, a, the marsupial bones, or those supporting the well-known pouch, are seen. These bones are only found in the Marsupials and Mono- Fig. 7. — Haunch-bones of Kangaroo : a, a, marsupial bones ; d, socket for thigh-bone. tremes, and whilst in most of the former they support a pouch, they are never associated with that structure in the Mono tremes. Now, it is in the Monotremes — represented by the Ornithorhynchus (Fig. 6) and the Echidnas — that the characters linking quadruped life to lower life are most typically seen. It may be well to strengthen our position at the outset, by reminding the reader that FOUND LINKS. 137 in the early life of all quadrupeds, without exception, there are to be perceived evidences of their connexion with lower forms of life. Thus, every Vertebrate, at an early stage of its development, exhibits certain clefts or openings in the sides of the neck, known as branchial clefts, and which are bounded by folds called branchial arches. These, in fishes, come to bear the gills, but in reptiles, birds, and quadrupeds, they simply disappear — useless rudiments of struc- tures, once necessary in the life of aquatic quadruped- ancestors, and still retained in the developments of to-day by the law of inheritance. Thus, in the deve- lopment of a rabbit, the biologist sees three pairs of branchial arches behind the mouth of the embryo, and four branchial clefts. Three of the clefts dis- appear, and the fourth, by the modification to which •development has been subjected in the evolution of the quadruped tribes, is converted into the Eustachian tube and other structures belonging to the ear. The presence of (< branchial clefts" in the developing mammal would alone suffice to show its evolution from lower life. Denying that probability, which to the biologist is a fact, there is no explanation what- ever of the cause or existence of these vanishing struc- tures in the history of the quadruped race. Concentrating our attention on the Monotremes themselves, however, we may speedily discover nume- rous links which unite them with lower life, and specially with the bird-type. There, firstly, exists in these quadrupeds what Huxley has called " a striking 133 NATURE STUDIES feature " of reptiles, of birds, and of the frog-class as well, in the structure of the shoulder. In the shoulder of an ordinary quadruped, and of a kangaroo and its marsupial race as well, there are but two distinct bones. One of these is the shoulder-blade, or scapula, the other being the collar-bone, or clavicle. In the shoulder of a bird (Fig. 8) there are three distinct B Fig. 8.— Shoulder-bones of (A) an Eagle, and (B) an Ostrich. elements, the scapula (Fig. 8, d) clavicle (c), and the coracoid bone (6, b). This last in quadrupeds, a mere process of the shoulder-blade, forms, as shown in Figure 8, the chief support of the wing in birds, and arises directly from the breastbone (a). Now, it is a remarkable fact that the Ornithorhynchus and Echidna, alene of all quadrupeds, possess a distinct coracoid bone, which, as in birds and reptiles, springs from the FOUND LINKS. 139 breastbone. Again, there is another bone, called the epicomcoid, which is found in reptiles, and which exists likewise in the Ornithorhynchus and Echidna. In the bird, again, as everybody knows, the two col- lar-bones unite to form the "merry -thought," or furculum (Fig. 8, c). In these lowest quadrupeds the collar-bones (Fig. 9, cc) are joined by a T-shaped P Fig. 9. — Shoulder-bones of Ornithorhynclms : c, c, clavicles ; i, interclavicle ; 6, breast-bone ; sr, sternal or breast-bone ribs, as in birds. bone, called the interclavicle (Fig. 9, i], unknown in any other mammals ; and here, again, we find a cha- racter which is decidedly reptile-like and bird-like, and which is not seen in other mammals. Professor Flower tells us that the shoulder-girdle of these quadrupeds " differs widely in many points from that of any other mammal, and far more resembles that of the Lizards." I40 NATURE STUDIES. The jaws of the Ornithorhynchus are prolonged to form a flattened horny bill (Fig. 6), on the upper aspect of which the nostrils are seen. It is the pos- session of this bill which, has given origin to the name " duck-billed," applied to this animal. The Echidna possesses no such structure, but has simply a flexible .snout. There also exist in the internal anatomy of these curious animals certain characters which relate them to the birds and reptiles. For example, the bones of the head are firmly ossified together, as in birds, and the sutures, or lines of union of the skull-bones, do not persist, as is usually the case with quadrupeds, whilst the hollow of the haunch-bones (Fig. 7, d), in which the head of the thigh works to form the hip- joint, is not fully ossified, and ttyus comes to resemble the similar structure in birds and crocodiles. The ears of these lower quadrupeds differ from those of other mammals in not possessing a spiral arrangement of that part of the organ named the cochlea. As in very many reptiles, the upper, or front, or neck-ribs of these quadrupeds long remain as separate bones; and the same remark holds good of the curious little pivot (odontoid process) on which the head turns. This pivot in quadrupeds is firmly joined to the second bone of the neck; but in the Monotremes, as in reptiles, it remains separate and distinct till a very late period — if, indeed, it becomes ossified at all. The internal anatomy likewise reveals characters of bird and reptile life which can only be alluded to here. FOUND LINKS. 14 r The arrangements of the internal organs in many respects present the closest likeness to the anatomy of birds and reptiles, and this is particularly the case with those structures in the quadrupeds which repre- sent the egg-producing organs of the bird and reptile. Even the typical mammalian characters are but feebly represented in these lowest quadrupeds. We kno\\r that the young, although born alive, as in quadruped' life at large, are provided with a horny knob on the upper jaw, such as is seen in the young bird ; and no- teats exist in the milk-glands of these forms, a feature represented in all other members of their class. Summing up the inferences to be drawn from our brief study of the lowest quadrupeds, we may legiti- mately hold, firstly, that they are of essentially lower- structure than other mammals ; secondly, that all the points in which they evince this inferiority ally them, at the same time, to birds and reptiles ; and thirdly, that the only feasible explanation of the differences in question is that which regards them as arising from the nearer relationship — the result of heredity and descent — which these lowest quadrupeds present to birds and reptiles. In a concluding paper, I shall strive to show the- nature of the links which unite the Vertebrate animals, to their lower and Invertebrate neighbours. 142 NATURE STUDIES PART V.— LINKS BETWEEN BACK-BONED AND BONELESS ANIMALS. IN the present paper I purpose to give a,n outline of the means whereby the zoologist has been enabled to supply " links " between the Vertebrate, or " back- boned " animals, and the Invertebrate, or " boneless " animals. Ever since the time of Lamarck, the dis- tinction between the highest, or Vertebrated animals (fishes, frogs, reptiles, birds, and mammals or quad- rupeds) and the Invertebrate groups, has been recog- nised as one of very clear nature. And modern zoology, dealing merely with the structure of the animals in question, fully recognises the apparent gap which intervenes between the great array of boneless animals — such as worms, insects, shell-fish, &c. — and the "backboned" group. But, as in many other cases, a closer examination of the lowest Vertebrate group seems to demonstrate that the gulf between the highest animals and their Invertebrate neighbours is by no means so wide or impassable as, at first sight, it appears to be. The lowest fish and Verte- brate is the Amphioxus, or Lancelot (Fig. 10). This is a little clear-bodied fish — formerly regarded as a kind of slug — found inhabiting sand-banks in various quarters of the world. It attains a length of an inch or two, and is pointed at each end. It has a kind of FOUND LINKS. 143 "back and tail fin, but possesses none of the " paired " fins, which, existent in most other fishes, represent the limbs of higher animals. The mouth (o) is an oval slit, and is fringed with gristly filaments. The lancelet has no brain, heart, bones, skull, ears, or kidneys. It is the only vertebrate which wants a heart, and it is likewise the only vertebrate in which the blood is colourless. Along the back runs the only representative of the skeleton — namely, a soft rod-like body, called the notochord (n). This struc- Fig. 10. — The Laucelet (Amphioxus lanceolatus\ enlarged to twice its natural size, (o Mouth ; 6 Enlarged pharynx ; g Stomach ; h Sac representing the liver ; i Intestine ; a Anus ; n Noto- chord ; / Rudiments of fin-rays ; p Abdominal pore.) ture, by the way, is found in the early development of every vertebrate animal, being replaced in all, save a few fishes, as time passes, by the spine itself. Above this rod lies the nervous cord of the lancelet. The mouth opens into a very wide throat or pharynx (b)} whose walls are perforated with slits that open into the cavity of the body. The walls of this great throat are richly set with the microscopic processes called cilia, which, by their incessant waving, cir- 144 NATURE STUDIES. culate the water admitted to the cavity. The throat leads into a simple stomach (g), and this, in turn, leads into the intestine (i). A liver (h) of the most rudimentary description also exists. The blood, in the absence of a heart, is circulated by the contrac- tions of the blood-vessels, and it is interesting to note that the arrangement seen in all vertebrates, whereby a portion of the venous or impure blood is sent to the liver for the manufacture of bile, is represented even in this curious fish. When the lancelet breathes, water is received into the throat, passes over the net- work of blood-vessels in the walls thereof, and after giving up its oxygen to the blood, is sent by the ciliary action through the slits in the throat into the body cavity. Thence it is expelled through a small opening near the tail, and called the abdominal pore (p). The lancelet differs from every other vertebrate animal in the absence of a heart, skull, brain, and kidneys, and in the colourless blood ; in the peculiar and rudimentary liver; and in a digestive system, which, like the throat, is also lined with cilia. But that it is a vertebrate is proved by the presence of the notochord (ri), already remarked as being deve- loped in the early life of every vertebrate animal. The supply of venous blood to the liver is also a ver- tebrate character; whilst its development, studied from the egg onwards, no less clearly shows its right and title to be regarded as a true vertebrate. Passing now to a very different group of animals, FOUND LINKS. 145 we find the Tunicate*, Ascidians, or " Sea Squirts " (Fig. 11), to present us with certain highly interesting features for remark. These ani- mals are usually regarded as poor relations of the shell-fish or Mol- luscs ; and they exist both in a fixed and free state. The fixed sea squirts are tolerably common, and are found attached to shells and other objects dredged from deep water. Each sea squirt is a clear leathery bag, an inch or two in length. Like the old f ' wine- skin" it has two necks or openings (d, i). One leads into a white throat or pharynx (A), the walls of which are richly ciliated, and which are perforated by numerous openings, whilst the whole throat, like that of the lancelet, is richly supplied with blood-vessels. The other opening is a door of exit. It leads from a sac or bag, called the atrium, into which the water used in breathing is wafted from , T , i mi i the throat. Ihus, when a sea squirt breathes, the water is in- , . , , ,, . haled by the mouth - opening, aerates the blood contained in the vessels of the throat, and is then sent into the atrium, whence L ^ u__ Amm,rouci. ^^> a Sea Squirt. (AJ Pharynx, or respira- tory portion of the bodF; B> stomach; c, egg-producing organ.) 146 -NATURE STUDIES. it is discharged into tlio outer world. The sea squirt's stomach. (B) opens from the throat, and its intestine in turn opens into the atrium. A heart (?) exists in the shape of a curious tube, which propels the blood for so many beats in one direction, and then, reversing its action, sends that fluid for so many pulsations in the opposite direction. A single nervous mass lies between the two openings of the body, and the other wall of the body itself consists largely of a material called cellulose, which is a com- mon plant compound. The animal in such a case manufactures the substance of the plant, and imitates the chemistry of the latter organism. Such is an outline of the rooted and fixed should have believed that each was the work of a separate act of creation." And, finally, concerning the often-assumed degradation of vertebrate ancestry, the late distinguished author of the " Origin of Species " has a noble passage wherein he gives the death-blow to all arrogance of heart and mind respecting 150 NATURE STUDIES. the origin of the highest forms : — " Thus we have given to man a pedigree of prodigious length, but not, it may be said, of noble quality. The world, it has often been remarked, appears as if it had long been preparing for the advent of man; and this, in one sense, is strictly true, for he owes his birth to a long line of progenitors. If any single link in this chain had never existed, man would not have been exactly what he now is. Unless we wilfully close our eyes, we may, with our present knowledge, approximately recognise our parentage ; nor need we feel ashamed of it. The most humble organism is something higher than the inorganic dust under our feet ; and no one with an unbiassed mind can study any living creature, however humble, without being struck with enthusi- asm at its marvellous structure and properties/' PART VL— SUMMARY. I PURPOSE in this concluding article to direct atten- tion to the very interesting, and at the same time astonishing, facts in favour of evolution which recent researches amongst extinct and fossil Mammalia (or Quadrupeds) have brought to light. The quadruped class presents us with a large and varied array of animal forms ; and it is therefore needful that at the outset we should endeavour to gain some plain ideas respecting the arrangement of the class into " orders." These latter are the subordinate groups into which every " class " of animals is primarily divided. To FOUND LINKS. 15 r l)egin with, the quadrupeds themselves, as a class, are capable of being divided into two distinct series. Of these, the first, as mentioned in a previous paper, con- tains the kangaroos, wombats, opossums, and their neighbours, along with the Ornithorhynchus, or duck- billed water- mole of Australia, and its near neighbour, the Echidna. These animals form collectively a divi- sion which may be named that of " Lower Mammals," inasmuch as, in respect of many points in their anatomy, they exhibit a decided inferiority to our common quadrupeds, and to the other members of the class. All other quadrupeds may be named " Higher Mammals," since they exhibit among themselves an agreement in structure which places them above the kangaroos and their kith and kin. Tabulating the great class of quadrupeds, we find that the following arrangement gives a brief sketch at once of the characters of the vai-ious "orders," and their chief representatives. Order the first is colled the Monotremata. It in- cludes the Ornithorhynchus and Echidna, both denizens of the Australian region. These animals exhibit bird-like characters, as has been shown in a previous paper. They possess " marsupial bones," like the kangaroo races ; and in many respects pre- sent us with a peculiar and special, but still low type of quadrupeds. The second order is that of the Marsupialia. These are the kangaroos, wombats, phalengers, and opossums; the latter alone being found outside the bounds of the Australian province. 152 NATURE STUDIES. Here tlie bird- characters have disappeared, although the included animals are of low structure as compared with such forms as the dogs, horses, seals, &c., of higher orders. The " Marsupials," as the name implies, usually possess a " pouch," supported on the " marsupial bones " that rise from the front of the haunch (see a a, Fig. 7, p. 136). Even if the " pouch itself be wanting (as in some opossums), the bones supporting it are developed. The Higher Mammals introduce us to order the third, that of the Cetacea, or Whales. A fish-like body, one fully-developed pair of limbs (the fore limbs) assisting in the shape of swimming-paddles, a horizontal tail- fin, and nostrils forming " blow-holes/' are the characters of which the whales, dolphins,, porpoises, and the like are characterised. The fourth order is that of the Sirenia, represented by two genera of animals — the Manatees, or Sea Cows, and Dugongs — long classified with the whales. Here tho body is again fish-like, and the fore limbs, which are alone developed, form swimming-paddles; but the nostrils do not form " blow-holes," and the skin is sparsely covered with bristles. The Edentata, or Ant-eaters, Armadillos, Sloths, and Pangolins, con- stitute the fifth order, whose head- quarters exist in South America. There is only a single set of teeth in these animals, and the teeth are further destitute of distinct roots, whilst they want enamel. Scales or bony plates, as in the Armadillos, often cover the body. FOUND LINKS. 153 An order of immense extent, that of the Ungulata, or " hoofed" quadrupeds, forms the sixth division. Here the largely-developed nails, called f( hoofs/' are met with, and all four limbs are always developed. The rhinoceroses, horses, pigs, ruminant animals (sheep, deer, oxen, camels, &c.), hippopotamus, &c.r represent this group. The seventh division is that of the elephants (Proboscidea) , the characters of these animals requiring no special mention. The hyrax, or " coney " of Scripture, represents the eighth group, and resembles the rodents or " gnawers " in some respects, whilst it is also allied to the rhinoceroses, if the form and structure of the molar or grinding teeth are considered. The Carnivora, or lions, tigers, wolves, dogs, bears, seals and walrus succeed, as order the ninth ; and the Rodents, or gnawers, with chisel-shaped front teeth, growing from permanent pulps, and represented by the rats, mice, beavers, squirrels, porcupines, &c., form the tenth division. The bats, or Cheiroptera, with an elongated hand of four fingers (and a short thumb), adapted to support a flying-membrane, form the eleventh group. The- Insedivora are the twelfth order, and present us with the moles, shrews, and hedgehogs as types. The Primates (including the Quadnimana, or monkeys, and Bimana, or man) bring us at once to the con- cluding order, and to the height of animal develop- ment. Now, as regards the past history of the Mammalia, there exists abundance of evidence to show that many 154 NATURE STUDIES. extinct quadrupeds stand in relation to these existing orders in the light of "intermediate forms" or "links." The recent researches of Professor Marsh amongst the American fossil mammals have been fraught with literally surprising results in this latter direction. Prior, however, to Marsh's discoveries, there were not wanting facts which pointed to the conclusion that the demands of evolution for links between the existing orders of quadrupeds would not be made in vain. Take, for example, the single order of the Whales. No more circumscribed and apparently distinct group of animals exists, yet their relationship to other orders of quadrupeds is no mere matter of conjecture, but one of proof. There is a fossil whale known as Zeuglodon, found in Tertiary deposits, and so named from the peculiar double-nature of the molar teeth. Whales with such teeth are unknown to-day, and when the affinities of Zeuglodon are examined, they are seen to point to a clear connexion with the Seals and Walruses, belonging, as we have seen, to the Oarnivora. It would thus seem as if the natural idea that the Seals and Whales were near relations was founded on fact ; and fossil whales certainly tend to bridge over the gulf betwixt the two groups. But this case, powerfully as it argues in favour of the connected series of animals which evolution requires, is by no means solitary. We have long known, for example, of the Anoplotlierium, an extinct quadruped, which presents in itself a curious mixture of the characters of Pigs and Ruminant animals, i. e.t those FOUND LINKS. ^5 tliat "chew the cud/' and comparative anatomists will tell us that the pigs and hippopotamus group themselves show, in many respects, an approximation to the Ruminants*. Or to take yet another example from Cuvierian times, we find in the Palcvotherium an animal which links the Tapirs to the Horses, and which shows a combination of characters that amply satisfies the evolutionist of its " intermediate " nature. But the more recent discoveries of Marsh throw the foregoing cases into the shade in respect of the mass of material which that indefatigable palaeontologist has accumulated. Thus we have been forced to con- stitute a whole series of new orders for the reception of the forms Professor Marsh has unearthed. What, for instance, shall we say of the extinct Dinoceras and its neighbours ? These huge elephantine animals united in themselves the characters of Elephants, and of odd-toed " hoofed " quadrupeds. With limb-bones like those of Elephants, Dinoceras possessed teeth that exhibited a combination of the characters of carni- vorous animals with those of " hoofed " forms. More extraordinary still were the Tillodonts from the Eocene rocks of the United States. Here are combined the features of hoofed quadrupeds (Ungulata) , Carnivorous animals, and Rodents. With a skull like that of a Bear, Tillotherium possessed front teeth exactly resem- bling those of the Rodents, or " Gnawers," and which appear to have combined to grow throughout the life of the animal, whilst the grin ding- teeth were those of a hoofed animal. So, also, another group of extinct 156 NATURE STUDIES. animals, of which Toxodon is the chief, presents us with a combination of characters mingling those of the " Hoofed " forms with those of Rodents and Eden- tates— such as the Sloths, Ant-eaters, &c. As a final example of the curious " links " between existing forms, which may be found amongst the treasures disclosed by scientific inquiry, the curious " Flying Lemurs" (Galeopitheciis) may be mentioned. These animals are found in the Eastern Archipelago, and resemble squirrels in appearance. A curious fold of skin stretches from the sides of the neck to the fore limbs, and between hind limbs and tail. The body is thus fringed, as it were, by a broad fold of skin, and although, unlike the bats, the flying lemurs do not possess true powers of flight, the skin-folds serve as a kind of parachute, supporting these animals in the air, as they take their flying leaps from tree to tree. In their internal anatomy, these animals exhibit transitional features, and on the whole may be regarded as linking the Insectivora with the higher group of the Primates in which Man and Apes are included. Whilst it seems tolerably clear that the Bats them- selves are merely Insectivorous animals which have undergone the modifications fitting them for true flight. Such is a brief and meagre outline of the result of an incursion into the province of geology as that science relates itself to the past history of living forms. In concluding the series of papers on " Found Links," I may perhaps be permitted to add that the design of FOUND LINKS. 157 these articles will have been fully served, if they may in any way stimulate the personal inquiries of my readers into the great study of modern times, namely, that of ascertaining how the universe of life has been modified and evolved. Such a study is fraught with profit in more ways than one. The search after evi- dence in favour of or against Evolution necessitates an amount of inquiry which is certain to strew the observer's pathway with curious facts concerning every department of life science. Furthermore, the main question at issue is one which in reality under- lies all our conceptions of life, and of the order of nature. It is the question which the best and wisest of mankind have ever asked and inquired of them- selves— the How, Why, and Whence of this world and its belongings. Happy indeed are they who, in the spirit of earnest truth-seekers, are permitted to engage in the work of discovering new facts and phases of the wondrous story of creation, which Nature is ever inviting us to peruse. INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. BY R. A. PROCTOR. FEW of the questions raised in Darwin's " Descent of Man " are at once more difficult to deal with satis- factorily, or more important in their bearing on the subject of that volume, than the question how far animals possess mental powers akin to those of man. 1 58 NATURE STUDIES It is somewhat singular, we may remark in passing, that Darwin and Huxley, whose views in some respects are so similar, and who are regarded by the general public as standing side by side in their advocacy of the theory of the relationship of man to the lower animals, should seem to uphold almost exactly opposite opinions respecting the cerebral qualities of animals, — one maintaining that in some cases animals reason, while the other (if we rightly apprehend what Huxley has said about animal auto- matism) will scarcely allow that animals even possess consciousness. We propose here to consider some cases in "which animals have seemed to reason. The importance of the subject will be recognised if we remember Darwin's admission that, had no organic being except man possessed any mental power, or if man's powers had been of a wholly different nature from those of the lower animals, we should never have been able to convince ourselves that our high faculties had been gradually developed. Darwin expresses his belief that there is no fundamental difference of this kind. " We must also admit/' he says, " that there is a much wider interval in mental power between one of the lowest fishes, as a lamprey or a lancelet, and one of the higher apes, than between an ape and a man ; yet this immense interval is filled up by numberless gradations.'1 But this has not been so generally admitted, despite the evidence advanced by Darwin, as might have been expected. The feeling is still INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 159 commonly entertained that a distinction exists between the mental qualities of the cleverest ape and the dullest and stupidest savage, which is utterly unlike any that exists among animals. In this essay we shall have to consider cases in which rats, cats, dogs, &c., — animals all inferior in mental faculties, though not all in equal degree, to the more intelligent apes, — have acted in ways which seem to imply reasoning. We shall treat these cases rather from the point of view of an opponent of Darwin's thesis above quoted than of a supporter, endeavouring in every case to find explanations not involving the exercise of reasoning faculties. But we must admit at the outset, that we find ourselves led to precisely the conclusion he has indicated. In the first place, we must recall to our reader's recollection those instances which have been selected by Darwin as so satisfactory, that in his opinion any one not convinced by them would not be convinced by anything that he could add. Rengger states, says Darwin, " that when he first gave eggs to his monkeys, they smashed them, and thus lost much of their contents; afterwards they gently hit one end against some hard body, and picked off the bits of shell with their fingers. After cutting themselves only once with any sharp tool, they would not touch it again, or would handle it with the greatest care. Lumps of sugar were often given them wrapped up in paper, and Rengger some- times put a live wasp in the paper, so that in hastily 160 NATURE STUDIES. unfolding it they got stung" (the tenderness of some of these students of science towards animals is quite touching). " After this had once happened, they always first held the packet to their ears, to detect any movement within ." These were not monkeys of the higher orders, but American monkeys, none of which are so near man in cerebral development as the orang, the champanzee, the gibbon, or the gorilla. The next cases relate to the dog, and are important, first, because two independent observers give evi- dence in the same direction ; and secondly, because the action of the dogs can hardly be explained as resulting from the modification of an instinct. " Mr. Colquhoun winged two wild ducks, which fell on the opposite side of a stream ; his retriever tried to bring over both at once, but could not succeed ; she then, though never before known to ruffle a feather, deliberately killed one, brought over the other, and returned for the dead bird. Colonel Hutchinson relates that two partridges were shot at once, one being killed, the other wounded ; the latter ran away, and was caught by the retriever, who on his return came across the dead bird. ( She stopped, evidently greatly puzzled, and after one or two trials, finding she could not take it up without permitting the escape of the winged bird, she considered a moment, then deliberately murdered it 9 (the winged bird), ' by giving it a severe crunch, and afterwards brought away both together. This was the only known in- stance of her having wilfully injured any game/ INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 161 " Here/' proceeds Darwin, " we have reasoning, though not quite perfect, for the retriever might have brought the wounded bird first, and then returned for the dead one, as in the case of the two wild ducks/' If the dog had followed the wiser course, it would not have been quite so clear as in the actual case that he had reasoned, though the pause for consideration after an attempt to take both together, would have gone far to suggest that ex- planation. But the action of the dog in killing the bird seems quite decisive, because such an act was entirely opposed to the instincts of the breed, and to the training which retrievers receive. To these cases Darwin adds the statement that "the mulateers in South America say, ' I will not give you the mule whose step is the easiest/ but la mas rational — the one that reasons best " ; on which Humboldt has remarked, " this popular expression, dictated by long experience, combats the system of animated machines better, perhaps, than all the argu- ments of speculative philosophy." Here, although Darwin only quotes Humboldt, he manifestly expresses his own view, and we find him opposed in a very definite manner to the theory of Kepler, afterwards supported by Descartes, and recently advocated by Huxley and others, that animals are automata, not possessing consciousness (or at any rate that this theory is admissible) . The next case to be considered is one which was described a year or two since in Nature. It was not M NATURE STUDIES. one which in reality demonstrated, or even strongly suggested, the exercise of reasoning faculties by animals. We quote it, however, because it illustrates well the mistakes into which want of care may lead the student of our subject. During the cold weather of a recent winter the writer of the letter in question put bread on the window-sills of his drawing-room for the benefit of the birds. These, finding food there, were constantly fluttering about the windows. " One day a large water-rat was seen on the window-sill, helping himself to the bread. In order to reach the window he had to climb to a height of about 1 3 f t. ; this he did by the help of a shrub trained against the wall. Neither instinct nor experience/' proceeds the cor- respondent of Nature, " will easily account for his conduct, since he never found food there before. If neither experience nor instinct, what, save reason, led him ? His action seems to have been the result of no small observation and reasoning. He seems to have said to himself: I observe the birds are thronging the window all day; they Would not be there for naught ; it may be they find there something to eat ; if so, perhaps I, too, might find there something I should like. I shall try." The way in which this story is told singularly illustrates the difficulty which we, as speaking animals, find in understanding how a process of reasoning can be carried on without the imagined use of words. Probably few men whose mental powers have been well trained carry on a pro- cess of pure ratiocination, without clothing with words INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 163 the thoughts successively suggested to their minds. It almost seems to a mind thus accustomed to reason -with a verbal accompaniment (audible to the mind's ear only) that any mental process not thus accom- panied must be to some degree instinctive, and any actions resulting from such a process automatic. But it is certain that even the most intellectual sometimes act in a manner which, if noticed in an animal, would suggest the exercise of reasoning power, not only without putting their thoughts into mental language, but without, in reality, noting what they are doing. However, the point to be specially noticed about the above story is that the narrator overlooks the most obvious, and probably the true, explanation of the rat's behaviour. The rat could not see the food, but most probably he could smell it. If so, his adventuring up the wall to get it was not the result of reasoning, or, at least, not necessarily so, for that was the shortest path to the much-needed food. Possibly the birds themselves may have been an attraction to him. Certainly the case is not one which compels us to believe that water-rats reason. This objection was so well urged, in company with other points necessary to be considered in such inquiries, by a German writer, Herr H. T. Finck, that we quote his remarks almost in full. " Before we ascribe to a rat such complicated reasoning powers/' Herr Finck remarks, ' ' it is necessary to ask if there is no other simpler way of accounting for the pheno- mena. I think there is. It is well-known that different 1 64 NATUEE STUDIES species of animals vary greatly in the acuteness of their senses. To man, sight is the most important sense, and the same is true of many other animals and most birds. The cat is a representative of another smaller class of animals, whose most perfect organ of sense is the ear; while the dog lives in a field of sensitives, the most important of which are con- tributed by the sense of smell." This point, as dogs afford many of the most striking illustrations of reasoning, or of what looks like reasoning, in animals, must be carefully remembered. Few are aware, we believe, how imperfect a sense is sight with all dogs, as compared with our own sense of sight. We believe that there could not be cited a single instance tending to show that a dog has been able to see as well as a very short-sighted man would, while in the great majority of cases, it can be shown by a few easily- tried experiments that dogs scarcely see at all in the true sense of the word. Our sense of smell is probably not more completely inferior to the same sense with dogs, than is their sense of sight to ours. To return, however, to Herr Finck. After pointing out that the- rat belongs to the class of animals who are guided by the sense of smell, he says, "It is evident, therefore^ that the water-rat in question was led to the window- sill by his nose, which in his case was a more trustworthy guide than his eyes would have been. I do not wish to deny, by any means, that animals have reasoning powers. On the contrary, I am convinced that human and brute intellect differ only in degree,. INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 165 not in kind. But what we have to guard against is not to ascribe [he obviously means the reverse, that we are to guard against ascribing] to animals reason- ing powers of a higher type than is consistent with the development of their brain, especially when the actions which seem, to postulate such powers can be readily accounted for by simply bearing in mind the extraordinary acuteness of one or more of their senses. We are altogether too prone to judge the intellectual life of animals by the human standard — to imagine that the eye is everywhere, as with us, the leading source of knowledge. The neglect of the important role which the sense of smell plays in animal life has been particularly fruitful of errors in philosophical speculation. It has, among other things, helped to give a longer basis of life to the old theory of instinct, regarded as a mysterious power of nature." In passing, we may remark that at the very beginning of our own life the sense of smell is stronger and more useful than the sense of sight ; as though during those first few days, before the eyes acquire power to recognise objects or to do much more than to distinguish light from darkness, we belonged, for the time being, to that inferior class of animals with whom the pre- dominant sense is that of smell. In that part, also, of their lives, human beings seem so far to resemble the lower animals that their actions appear to be governed by instinct solely. In reality, probably, a sense of smell much keener then than during the subsequent years, which alone we can remember, 1 66 NATURE STUDIES. governs the actions in the same way, though not so obviously,, as sight governs them in most of the actions of later years. The next case cited also relates to the apparent exercise of reasoning faculties by rats, and is inter- esting, because probably their action was guided by the sense of hearing, rather than by that of smell. " Some years ago," says the narrator, " a plumber told me that he had, on several occasions, been called in to examine into the cause of leakage of water-pipes under the flooring of houses, and had found that the rats had gnawed a hole in the leaden pipe to obtain water, and that great numbers of them had made it a common drinking-place, as evidenced by the quantity of dung lying about. The plumber brought me a piece of leaden pipe, about three quarters of an inch in diameter, and one-eighth of an inch in thickness, penetrated in two places, taken by himself from a house on Haverstock-hill. There are the marks of the incisors on the lead as clear as an engraving ; and a few hairs and two or three of the rat's whiskers have been pinched into the metal in the act of gnawing it. This crucial proof of brute intelligence — for a rat will not drink foul water — interested me so much that I ventured to send an account of it to Dr. Charles Dar- win, asking his opinion on the means by which the rats ascertained the presence of water in the pipe. To this he replied : ' I cannot doubt about animals reasoning in a practical fashion. The case of the rats is very curious. Do they not hear the water trick- INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 167 ling?'" This explanation wonld go far, it would seem, to do away with the idea that the rats in this case had reasoned, seeing that if they recognised the presence of water by the sense of hearing, their action in biting their way through to what they wanted would correspond precisely with what we have been taught (erroneously, in all probability, but that is a detail) to regard as instinctive. The narrator, how- ever, did not read Dr. Darwin's reply in this sense. " It may be conceded/7 he says, " that this explana- tion is the most probable, and if it be the true one, we have an example of an animal using his senses to obtain the data for a process of reasoning leading to conclusions about which he is so certain that he will go to the trouble of cutting through a considerable thickness of lead. Obviously man could do no more under the same conditions." If the rats had shown in their boring operations some special aptitude for securing most conveniently, with the least possible overflow, the water they required, this would be a just inference. But as we know no more than that, having found, probably by the sense of hearing, that water was present in the pipe, they bored their way through to reach it, we have in reality no more proof of reasoning power than is afforded by the familiar action of mice biting their way through the wooden or card casings of boxes of edibles they like, of whose presence within such boxes the sense of smell has convinced them. This objection is well put by Mr. Henslow in a 1 68 NATURE STUDIES. letter discussing this particular case, and Dr. Darwin's comments thereon, only, as it seems to us, he carries the objection rather further than it will fairly go, extending it to cases to which we think it can hardly be applied. " It has always seemed to me/' he says, " that brute reasoning is always practical, but never abstract" (but he tries to show that there is very little reasoning at all in the matter). " They do wonderful things, suggested by the objective fact before them; but, I think, never go beyond it. Thus, a dog left in a room alone, rang the bell to fetch the servant. Had not the dog been taught to ring the bell (which, on inquiry, proved to have been the case), it would have been abstract reasoning; but it was only practical. The Arctic fox — too wary to be shot, like the first, who took a bait tied to a string, which was attached to the trigger of a gun — would dive under the snow and so pull the bait down below the line of fire. This is purely practical reasoning ; but had the fox pulled the string first out of the line of fire, in order to discharge the gun, and then to get the bait, that would have been abstract reasoning, which ho could not attain to." This, however, is assuming more than can be proved; the fox, in the case re- ferred to, did not act in the way which would have implied abstract reasoning ; we do not know that no fox has ever done so, still less that, failing a simpler way of attaining his object, no fox could so reason. Albeit, we believe there are very few cases in which a line of reason involving so many steps as that sug- INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 169 gested by Mr. Henslow has been followed by an animal. Mr. Henslow makes a good point in noting how like the practical reasoning of animals is the reasoning of young folk. " A boy the other day/' he says, "found the straps of his skates frozen. The fact only suggested cutting them. Not one of his schoolfellows reflected upon the abstract fact that the ice would melt if he sat upon his foot a few minutes. Hence brutes and boys are exactly alike in that nothing occurs to either beyond what the immediate fact before them may suggest. The one kind I call purely practical reasoning, which both have; the other abstract, which brutes never acquire; but the boy will as his intelligence develops." Certainly the next case cited in the correspondence suggests practical rather than abstract reasoning. •" In Central Park, one very hot day, my attention/' writes Mr. James J. Furniss, of New York, "was drawn to the conduct of an elephant which had been placed in an inclosure in the open air. On the ground was a large heap of newly-mown grass, which the sagacious animal was taking up by the trunkf ul, and laying carefully upon his sun-heated back. He con- tinued the operation until his back was completely thatched, when he remained quiet, apparently enjoying the result of his ingenuity. It seems to me that instinct should have prompted the elephant to eat the grass, and that it was reason which caused him to use it for the purpose of diminishing the effect of the sun's says." Undoubtedly, had hunger been the 170 NATURE STUDIES. prevailing sensation at the time, instinct would have caused the elephant to eat the grass. But, as he was probably much troubled by the heat, it was not more wonderful that he should throw grass on to his back, than it would have been if, had there been any shadow, he should have withdrawn under it. Doubt- less, however, the true explanation is that the elephant reasoned in a practical way. The effect of the grass as a protection from the heat was obvious to his senses, so he continued to add more and more grass to his covering until he felt comfortable. If the use of the grass for food occurred to him at all, it would have appeared obvious enough that even if all the grass were used for shelter, it would be none the less suitable for food when hunger began to be trouble- some. Passing over several cases which seem to carry the matter no further than those already cited, we come next to a case which appears to us one of the most striking ever recorded. The writer, Mr. E. H. Pi-ingle, remarks that it is an instance of sagacity which finally sets at rest any doubts he had ever entertained that the difference between human and animal intelligence is o one of degree only. We can see no way in which the story can be explained without assuming the exercise of something more than that mere practical reasoning which probably underlies all the so-called instinctive actions of animals : — Mr. J. W. Cherry, of the Madras Forest Service, is owner of a dog, a bull-terrier, called {f Bully." (This INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. I/I breed is notoriously not the most intelligent of the- canine tribe, so that the behaviour of Bully appears all the more striking.) " We lived/' says Mr. Pringle, "in the bungalow A/ the compound of which was j_ bounded south and west by public roads DC and G-FC,. both leading to the cantonment of Bangalore in the direction C. There were three gates into the com- 1 The figure presents all the features essential to a correct under- standing of Mr. Pringle's narrative. i;2 NATURE STUDIES. pound at C, D, and G, the main approach to the bungalow leading over a bridge B that spanned a public road FD. The compound was filled with trees and shrubs, and bordered by dense lantana hedges, so that with the exception of a portion of the western road at F, neither of the cantonment roads was visible from the bridge, nor could the footpaths be seen thence. Now, Bully had a lady friend (canine) living in the cantonment, and at times she was so attractive, that absences without leave on the part of the dog were frequent. After one of these excursions, Bully had been brought back and chained up for the night. Next morning, while his master and I were sitting at early breakfast, it was decided that he should be released, and to effectually stop further delinquency, a peon was sent down to the bridge with orders to intercept him if he started for the cantonment. Bully was brought in and unchained ; he had that unmis- takable air of detected guilt deservedly punished, and spent some time in begging for scraps from the table in a most deprecatory manner. Shortly, however, he strolled into the verandah, and then down the front steps on to the gravel walk. After wandering about aimlessly for a few minutes, he quietly started down the approach AHB. We followed, keeping out of his sight. At the turn of the road, Bully met with the unexpected apparition of the peon standing 011 the bridge. In a moment, though not a word was spoken by the man, the dog turned and came straight back to the room, whither we had in the meantime slipped INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 173 back unobserved, and re-entered it, wagging his tail violently, and looking exceedingly sheepish. He now lay down, and closed his eyes. The cocked ears showed that sleep was mere pretence, and he soon rose again, went into the front garden, and hunted for buried bones — purely imaginary ones, I believe. His search gradully led him down the hill by a footpath leading from A to G, we keeping him in sight, as before, and he finally reached the road at the bottom. There alt disguise was dropped, and he started off for the can- tonment. As he neared the spot F, the peon espied him, and shouted out his name. He turned at once, climbed the hill, and came into the bungalow, where the same farce of repentance was gone through. Bully now seemed to have made up his mind that escape was impossible; he lay down on a mat in the verandah, and remained there for a long time. But for the per- sistent cock of the ears, we should have imagined the animal really asleep. Mr. Cherry eventually went to his office-room, and I remained in the verandah, read- ing the morning paper and occasionally glancing at Bully. He lay very still, but once or twice I detected him opening his eyes and raising his head to look round him. Each time he caught my eye he wagged his tail vehemently for a moment or two, and then resorted to his sham sleep. It may have been for half- an-hour or thereabouts that this state of things con- tinued. I then became interested in an article in the paper, and when I next looked up, Bully was gone. I called Mr. Cherrv, and the house was searched for 174 NATVEE STUDIES. Bully. The peon was sent for and interrogated ; lie had not seen the dog. As a last resource, inquiry was made of the horse-keepers down at the stables, D. The reply was ' Yes ; the dog has passed through the gate, D, some time before/ Taking advantage of my occupation, and the absence of his master, Bully had left the house and taken his way to the cantonment by the only path by which he could have escaped un- noticed by the peon — that shown by the dotted line.3' It seems to us quite impossible to account for the dog's action, as above narrated, without attributing to him the exercise of reasoning powers, not merely in selecting the route by which he finally escaped, but in ' the manoeuvres by which he endeavoured to assure those who were watching him that he had given up all hope of escaping. Doubtless, if he had reasoned more perfectly, he would even have allowed his ears to seem asleep, instead of leaving them cocked. But very few of us human beings simulate sleep without some such error, by which any observant person would be enabled to detect the trick. Either the muscles of the face are not perfectly relaxed ; or the hands or feet are left in a constrained attitude ; or the position of the body generally is unlike that which a sleeping person would assume ; or else the breathing is unnaturally re- strained. And again, though Bully was too demon- strative in his contrition, and afterwards in his attempts to hide the consciousness of failure, it was not for want of reasoning power. Few of us know how to act such parts as he tried to play, with perfect correct- INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS, 175 ness ; nor do those who know suceed always in acting such parts as they could wish. Probably Bully was as sensible as the onlookers that he was not quite successful in his acting. It is obvious, however, that he directed his efforts as carefully to the end he wished to obtain as a human being of average rea- soning powers and skill in counterfeiting sleep, &c., could have done. Wigan, in his " Duality of the Mind/' says that he once offered an apple to an elephant, letting the apple drop at the moment the elephant was about to seize it, so that it rolled out of its reach. The elephant waited a moment to see if Wigan would pick it up, and being disappointed in this expectation, set him- self to blow violently against the opposite wall, and the recoil forced the apple to his feet. This may be regarded as a case of practical, rather than of abstract reasoning. Yet, as Wigan remarks, it was a trick which no one could have taught the animal, and ' ' it must have arisen from a process of reflection perfectly similar to that which takes place in the human mind " under similar conditions. We have, indeed, he justly remarks, " examples of human minds not even capable of the degree of thought possessed in this instance by the elephant, yet performing, by a sort of automacy (sic) all the ordinary functions necessary to their occupation. In some of the mechanical processes in our great manufactories, where the minute subdivision of labour reduces the art of each individual almost to the very ultimate elements of muscular motion, I i;6 NATUEE STUDIES. think that I have seen individuals incapable of a similar process." In the following instance, from the same work, we have ingenuity combined with, and suggested by, indignation : " A large grey spider established him- self in a recess formed by a shed and a projection of the house, and taking his long line diagonally from the corner of the house to the eaves of a small build- ing which was at the bottom of the recess, he then filled up the triangular space with a well-defined circular web. I had noticed with admiration during the day his wonderful skill, the accuracy of his lines, and the equality of the spaces, and observed how care- fully he pushed down his line, and fastened it securely with his two hind feet to each radius in succession. When he had finished about two-thirds of his con- centric circles, or rather of his helix, he went to the centre and swallowed a quantity of white tenacious mucus, which he had deposited there at the commence- ment, having apparently spun himself out ; he then proceeded to complete his work, which having accom- plished, and thus reduced himself to very small dimensions, he hung himself up by the hind legs, and I presume went to sleep. The slightest touch of a fly was, however, sufficient to make him start out, and having wrapped up a few of them in his toils and well stocked his larder, he again betook himself to repose. In the meantime, one of the smaller spiders, consider- ing that the diagonal line of his neighbour was strong enough to bear two webs, began to attach his lines to INTELLIGENCE IN ANUIALS. 1/7 it, and having done so in four or five places, pro- ceeded to spin his own web. My older friend tolerated the intrusion very patiently, and acquiesced in the use his neighbour was making of the " party wall/' though against spider law. By-and-by the newcomer, having partly fitted up his own trap, and finding that no flies came into it, observing, I presume, the ample supply of food in his neighbour's premises, advanced along one of his own lines, seemingly for the purpose of open burglary. My old friend had tolerated much, but this was a degree of impudence for which he was not prepared, and which he determined to punish forthwith. He proceeded to the centre of his web, and giving the whole framework a violent shake, hoped to shake the intruder down upon the ground. He did no more, however, than turn him round on the line, where he hung very patiently till the shaking ceased, and then resumed his march towards his neighbour's territory. Again and again, and with increasing violence, did the large spider shake his web — it was all in vain; there was the enemy advancing, and though so small as to be easily over- powered, should he reach the mainland, the insult of the attempt was intolerable. On looking round, my elder friend saw that, during the violent shakes, he had broken two or three of his own short lines, and he left his opponent and set himself to work to mend them. Having completed the task to his perfect satisfaction, he returned to the burglar. The latter, when he came near, saw at once that he had been N 178 NATURE STUDIES. rash, in provoking such an enemy, and hurried back to his own web. When his opponent saw him on his thin line in his retreat, he again set himself to his shaking fit, and made the most violent efforts to throw him down ; it was all in vain, however, and he got safe home. After a moment's consideration, the other seemed to think that so audacious an attempt ought to be condignly punished, and he determined to retort the invasion. The thin lines of his diminu- tive antagonist, however, did not afford a sufficient support for his heavy bulk, and as he advanced, he carefully spun a strengthener upon the other's tenuous cord. It was now the little one's turn to shake off the intruder, and twice did he break the thin part of the line, and leave his enemy dangling. At last, the latter gave up the attempt, and went back to the centre of his own web, after carefully detaching every- one of the lines which his neighbour had had the impudence to fasten to his long diagonal/' In this case we seem to recognise on both sides reasoning which approaches at times the abstract. In the calculation of means to an end, and change of plan in consequence of unexpected obstacles, there is practical reasoning. As Wigan well says, " Had the human race spun webs, and dared one another to single combat, they could not well have shown mor& judgment and skill in the attack and defence." The strengthening of the lines to bear the shaking, and doubling the smaller spider's lines while using them as lines of advance, belonged also to the order of INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 179 practical reasoning, though of a rather advanced kind. But there was abstract reasoning, it seems to us, or a near approach to it, in the conduct of the smaller spider, first of all in considering, as it were, how far he might trespass on the patience of an enemy whom he recognised as his superior, and again in the conduct of the larger in deciding when the time had come to give his small enemy a lesson, and in retreating finally without persisting, as if reflecting that his purpose was as well achieved as though he had actually driven the smaller spider from his web. His removing the lines which had supported the smaller web, though he had previously allowed them to remain, looks very much like a result of abstract reasoning. We find illustrated by such instances the remark of Dr. Prichard, that among insects, if we take the different tribes collectively, manifestations of all the psychical qualities which we observe in mammifers and birds (regarding as a whole the properties divided among different departments), may be recognised in the most strict analogy. Attention, memory, the faculty of combining means to attain ends, cunning, the desire of revenge, care of offspring, and all the other psychical qualities which have been traced in the former class of animals (mammifers) are likewise to be observed in the latter as typical or characteristic phenomena — sometimes in one combination, some- times in another ; or, in different groups, sometimes strongly, sometimes more feebly expressed. Let us next examine a few cases in which animals have N 2 I So NATURE STUDIES. done things which they have seen done by the persons with whom they live, and more or less obviously with the object of obtaining the result which they had observed to follow from such actions. For this would seem, if the animal can be clearly shown to have had such a purpose, to be distinctly the result of reasoning. Monkeys may or may not reason when they imitate actions which, when performed by themselves, are of no advantage to them, or are even mischievous. Indeed, it is not improbable that they suppose their human fellow-creatures would not perform such actions except for a useful purpose, though what that purpose may be they may have no conception. But whatever opinion we may form on this point, we can have, it would seem, no room for rejecting the belief that an animal has reasoned who performs an act demonstrably for the purpose of producing a certain effect, such as he has observed to follow when human beings have so acted. Now in some of the cases which follow, this does seem to be most clearly made out. A writer in Nature gives the following case : — " My sister, who lives just opposite to my own house, possesses a cat (now about thirteen years old), whose intelligence is very remarkable. He has a habit of making use of the knocker of a side door, which is just within his reach as he stands on his hind legs, whenever he desires admission. A single knock is tried in the first instance ; but if this is not answered promptly, it is followed by what is known as the ' postman's knock ' ; if this is not successful, trial is INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 181 then made of a scientific ' rat-tat ' that would not disgrace a west-end footman. I should say that ' Minnie ' holds the knocker in his paw as we should hold it in our fingers, and not by simply tipping it up. How far this practice involves ' abstract reasoning/ I will not say, but something like an approach to it is suggested, for he was never taught to knock at the door, and adopted the habit some three years ago, evidently to gain admittance, very often to the annoy- ance of my sister's family, who have occasionally been disturbed in this way at unseemly hours." The rest of the letter has no bearing on the subject we are upon, but it is too amusing to be omitted. ' ' I should be sorry/' says the writer, " in thus referring to the sagacity of poor pussy (who is now also somewhat feeble), to reflect upon him by noticing some other of his peculiarities, one of which is his fondness for a little brandy-and-water, and other alcoholic stimu- lants/' It would be, perhaps, to inquire somewhat too curiously to ask whether this story shows that the fondness for stimulants is associated with an advance in reasoning power, or whether, perhaps, Minnie's brain was aroused to abnormal activity by the tippling in which alone (we may assume) he was indulged by his mistress. The point established by the story is that in some cases — at any rate, as in animals so low in cerebral development as cats — the consequences of a certain action are observed and remembered, the action being repeated by the animal when he wants those particular consequences to follow. 1 82 NATURE STUDIES. This cannot be explained by any theory of mere instinct. In the last story, the cat was an old one, and though this does not modify the conclusion to be deduced from the animal's behaviour, yet it in some degree diminishes our estimate of the activity of Minnie's reasoning power. In the following case, a young cat showed equal intelligence : — " I may mention a case," says the writer, " of a kitten about half-grown, having mental reflection of some sort. I was sitting in one of the rooms at a house where I was stopping in Somersetshire, and hearing a knock at the front door, was told not to heed it, as it was only this kitten asking admittance. Not believing it, I watched for myself, and very soon saw this kitten jump on to the door, hang on by one leg, and put the other fore paw right through the knocker and rap twice. The knocker was an ordinary shaped one, fixed in the centre of the door half way up ; the top part of the door was glazed. I saw this performance dozens of times afterwards, and often used to put the kitten outside to see it done. It was never known to knock when any one stood in the garden, but if one went indoors and shut it outside, in a few minutes came the usual knock. A sister kitten to this one was never known to knock, but sat on the doorstep and entered when the door was opened, and in nine cases out of ten the knock was successful. The kitten was never taught in any way ; it would knock at both front and back door." INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 183 In the following case, the object of an animal's action in such cases was tested by an experiment, but the evidence is less satisfactory in one respect than that afforded by the two previous cases, the animal having been taught the action: "A small English terrier belonging to a friend/' says the narrator of the story, " has been taught to ring for the servant. To try if the dog knew why it rang the bell, he was told to do so while the girl was in the room. The little fellow looked up in the most intelligent manner at the person giving the order (his master or mistress, I forget which), then at the servant, and refused to obey, although the order was repeated more than once. The servant left the room, and a few minutes afterwards the dog rang the bell immediately on being told to do so." Here it is to be noticed that the dog did not ring the bell (as, in each of the preceding stories, the cat knocked at the door) to get some end of his own accomplished. He rang to save his master or mistress trouble. And the fact that he had been taught to ring for this purpose, although making the act itself less obviously a sign of reasoning power than the cat's action in knocking at the door, makes his refusal to ring when told to do so a more manifest evidence of reasoning than it would otherwise have been. If the dog rang for the servant because of some advantage he always gained from the servant's coming, it would have been natural enough that he should refrain from ringing when the servant was in the room. But his refusing to do what he had been 1 34 NATURE STUDIES. taught to do, at the risk of offending his master or mistress by such refusal, makes it absolutely certain that he had clearly recognised the object which was to be attained by ringing the bell. It may be objected that in cases such, as those we considered last, the animal has merely imitated an action which it has seen performed by others, and has subsequently -learned to associate the action with its ordinary consequence. Apart from the consideration, however, that although in any single case such an interpretation might possibly be correct, it would be most improbable that it should explain all cases in which cats or dogs have used knockers or rung bells in the usual way : cases may be cited in which animals have devised a way of their own for producing such signals. Thus Mr. E. L. La-yard, of the British con- sulate, Noumea, relates the following case in which a cat acted in a way which can hardly be explained, save by assuming that she reasoned : — " Many years ngo," he says, " we lived in Cambridge, in Emmanuel House, at the back of Emmanuel College. The pre- mises were partly cut off from the road by a high wall; the body of the house stood back some little distance. A high trellis, dividing off the garden, ran from the entrance door to the wall, in which was another door, or grate. A portion of the house, a gable, faced the trellis We were, after some time of residence, extremely troubled by runaway rings, generally most prevalent at night, and in rainy, bad, or cold weather, which was a great annoyance to INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 185 the servant girls, who had to cross the space between the house and the wall to open the outer door in the latter, and were thus exposed to wet and cold." The annoyance became so great, that Mr. Layard and a cousin watched behind the trees on "Jesus piece/' armed with stout ash saplings, wherewith to administer a sound thrashing to the ringer, whomsoever he might be. But though the rings continued, no one pulled the handle. Hence the theory of ghosts was naturally suggested, but Mr. Layard, having brains, rejected that interpretation. At length chance cleared up the mystery. " Being ill," he says, " I was confined to the wing facing the trellis, and one miserable, blowing, wet day, gazing disconsolately out of the window, espied my favourite cat — a singularly intelligent animal, much petted — coming along the path, wet, draggle-tailed, and miserable. Pussy marched up to the house-door, sniffed at it, pushed it, mewed, but, finding it fairly shut, clambered up to the top of the trellis, some eight or ten feet from the ground, reached a paw over the edge, scratched till she found the bell- wire which ran along the upper rail from the wall to the house, caught hold of it, gave it a hearty pull, then jumped down, and waited demurely at the dooi\ Out came the maid; in rushed puss. The former, after gazing vaguely up and down the street, returned, muttering f blessings,' no doubt, on the ghost, to be confronted by me in the hall. * Well, Lydia, I have at last found out who rings the bell/ ' Lard, master, ye haven't, surely' — she was broad Zumerzetsheer. 1 86 NATURE STUDIES. f I have, come and see. Look out of the breakfast- room window, but don't show yourself/ Meanwhile I went into the drawing-room, where Mrs. Puss was busy drying herself before the fire. Catching her up, I popped her outside of the door and ran round to my post of observation. Puss tried the door, and mewed, thinking, probably, some one must be near, and, after waiting two or three minutes in vain, again sprang up the trellis, and renewed her attack on the bell-wire, of course, to be immediately admitted by the delighted maid, who this time did not cross the yard, nor ever again, I fear sometimes to the inconvenience of visitors, if puss was waiting for admission." In this case it is possible that the cat may have only discovered by accident that the bell-wire could be reached in the way described. This is Mr. Layard's explanation. He considers that puss, in clambering up the trellis to the house-top, accidentally moved the wire and caused the bell to ring. It seems at least as likely that she noticed the wire moving when the bell was rung, and afterwards deliberately moved it to produce the desired effect. But in either case, it is clear that neither instinct nor mere imitative faculty can explain the cat's action in this case. In passing, I may remark that the imitative faculty, which some regard as a mere automatic quality, seems to me far better explained as the result of reasoning, though, of course, the reasoning is not of a very high order ; an animal seeing a man perform some action, infers that some advantage is to be gained by the action, and INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 187 repeats it in the expectation that some good result will follow, though without knowing what this may be. However, in the present case there was no imi- tation, nor certainly could any instinct have been in question. Mr. Layard mentions other cases, of which the same may be said. " I have known dogs shake a door violently," he says, " to attract attention and be let in. A dear old spaniel of ours at the Cape used to rattle the empty bucket if he was thirsty, and then come and look in our faces. My horse will come up from his pasture to the pump in the yard, and whinny till some one gives him water Surely all this is abstract reasoning/' he proceeds. " These things are not taught them, and they do not do all of them even by imitation. I don't go to the pump and whinny if I want drink ! nor rattle a bucket ! No ! they come by a process of mental reasoning, and I am convinced all animals have it to a certain degree, more or less." There have been cases which have afforded oppor- tunity of noting the behaviour of an animal when first some new experience has occurred to it, and (as it would seem) new ideas have been suggested. Such cases are of extreme importance in determining whether animals really reason or not ; because it must be admitted that in some instances where animals have appeared to reason, the action noted may possibly have originated, in the first instance, by accident, and have been continued subsequently as a mere habit. It is rather unfortunate that the only animals which we can observe under favourable conditions — domestic 1 88 NATURE STUDIES. animals, and those which, though not domestic, affect the neighbourhood of houses — are not those whose cerebral development is of the highest order among animals. If monkeys were commonly domesticated (which would, for other reasons, be by no means desirable), we should probably have a number of far more striking and convincing instances of animal reasoning than we at present possess, for nearly all monkeys are far higher in cerebral development than the most sagacious dogs, while horses, cats, rats, &c., are lower than dogs in this respect. Still if we remember that whatever evidence we obtain from the behaviour of dogs and cats must be regarded as sug- gesting, for this very reason, a powerful argument a, fortiori as to the reasoning faculties of monkeys, and especially of the higher orders of simians, we may be well satisfied with such instances as have been adduced above. The following case, showing how a cat- reasoned out the meaning of a phenomenon brought for the first time under its notice, seems to afford decisive evidence of the capacity of animals to deal with cases when neither instinct, habit, nor imitative faculty can afford them any assistance : — A household cat was observed to enter a bedroom which was being cleaned at spring-time : a looking-glass stood on the floor, and Tom, on entering, found himself confronted by an image which he naturally supposed to be another cat, an intruder on his domains. He made hostile demonstrations, which were presently followed up by a rush at his opponent, who, nothing loth, seemed to INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 189 rush also at him. Finding an apparent obstacle to his vengeance, Tom ran round behind the glass, where he found no enemy; so he came again to the front. Here he again found his foe, on whom he again made an onslaught, only to be similarly foiled. He repeated this two or three times, applying manifestly the inductive method to the problem before him. The result of these experiments was to suggest the theory that the cat in the looking-glass, if actually existent, was unlike those specimens of the feline race with whom Tom's experience had hitherto made him acquainted. These repeated failures must have a meaning, Tom seems to have reasoned. Either he was the victim of some illusion, or the cat behind the glass was of altogether exceptional activity. But, however active that cat may be, Tom proceeded to reason, he cannot be on the further side and yet not on the further side at the same moment of time. If, then, I look at him and see him to all appearance on the further side, while at the same time I feel for him there with my paws and find him not there, then the cat in the glass must be a mere fraud. JSTo sooner was this experimentum crucis devised by the clever cat than it was put into execution. Tom deliberately walked up to the looking-glass, keeping his eyes fixed on the image ; then, when near enough to the edge, he reached out carefully with his paw behind the glass for the supposed intruder, whilst with his head twisted round to the front he assured himself of the persistence of the reflection. He also must have recognised, 190 NATURE STUDIES. what the narrator seems to have overlooked — that the looking-glass was not, as it seemed, transparent, for the paw with which he was feeling about for the other cat was not visible, though the supposed intruder remained in view all the time. The apparent presence of the feline foe, though the feeling paw could not be seen, satisfied Tom fully. " The result of his experi- ment," says the narrator, (: satisfied the cat that he had been the victim of delusion, and never afterwards would he condescend to notice mere reflections, though the trap was more than once laid for him." It would, by the way, have been worth while to try whether a looking-glass without a frame deceived him after he had discovered the meaning of an ordinary mirror, or whether a cat placed on the other side of a transparent framed glass would be at first mistaken for a mere reflection — his conduct in either case being carefully watched. A cat which had shown such excellent capacity for reasoning was worth experimenting on. Whether we suppose that the cat of the preceding narrative judged of the position of his supposed foe solely by sight, or may partly have been influenced by the sense of sound (very slightly, in any case), it must be admitted that he showed a fitness for original research which some amongst ourselves might be found wanting in, if we may judge from their actions in certain cases. But it is an interesting question how far an animal may really be deceived by the image of another animal, or of some object in which the animal observer takes interest. There are stories INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 191 of birds pecking at painted fruit, and the like, of which some are unquestionably apocryphal. When we remember, too, that some savages fail utterly to understand the meaning of pictures,1 even of the most familiar objects, we may well doubt whether animals can possibly mistake a painted figure for a real object. Yet there are some stories which seem to show that animals certainly recognise pictures of persons, animals, or objects familiar to them. It would almost seem as though such cases could only be explained as depending on the exercise of a certain amount of reasoning power, the animal inferring that, because a certain picture presents details of shape and colour corresponding to those belonging to a familiar object, the picture is in some way connected with that object, although other senses, as of sight, smell, hearing, &c., must serve perfectly to prevent any possibility of actual deception. A letter in Nature, by one who remarks that "his own observations lead him to suppose that dogs very rarely take notice of a painting or any representation on the flat," seems to me espe- cially interesting, as illustrating how the sense of sight may for a moment deceive an animal which usually trusts chiefly to other senses. " I only know of one instance," he says. "A bull-terrier of mine was lying asleep upon a chair in the house of a friend, and was suddenly aroused by some noise. On opening 1 There are some illustrations of this in my little book called "The Flowers of the Sky," in the article relating to "Fancied Figures among the Stars." ig2 NATUEE STUDIES. his eyes, the dog caught sight of a portrait of a gentleman on the wall not far from him, upon which the light was shining strongly. He growled, and for some little time kept his eyes fixed upon the portrait, but shortly satisfying himself that there was no danger to be apprehended, he resumed his nap. I have often, " proceeds the narrator, " endeavoured since to induce him to pay some attention to portraits and pictures, but without success, though sometimes he will bark at his own reflection in a looking-glass. He knows it to be his own image that he sees, for he very soon tires of barking and looking." In the case last considered, we see that a dog, belonging to a species not distinguished for keenness of scent, was not long deceived by a picture, even under circumstances favouring the deception — as his previous sleep, the .position of rest from which he saw the figure, and the strong light shining upon it. As this was the only instance known to one who was familiar with the ways of dogs, the negative evidence respecting the recognition of pictures by animals is rather strong. However, there have been cases where animals, if not actually deceived by a picture, seem certainly to have understood what it was intended to represent. The following case seems to me full of interest. It is related by Mr. Chas. W. Peach, of Edinburgh. He remarks, first, that in certain publi- cations dogs are said never to have recognised a painted likeness. "During my residence in Corn- wall," he goes on to say, "I had a most intelligent INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 193 and faithful dog for fifteen years. I had him when a month old. His mother was a beautiful liver-coloured spaniel, rather large ; his father, a black Newfound- land ; my dog took after him in colour and shape. In 1843, a young- and self-taught artist asked me to allow him to paint my likeness in oil colours, and I con- sented. His studio was in the next town, three miles distant, and, as often as required, I went over. I> however, did not take my dog with me. It was done in ' kitcat ' size, and he succeeded so well in the likeness and artistic work, that, when exhibited at the annual meeting of the Polytechnic Society at Falrnouth, a medal was awarded for it ; and, as well, it was highly commended. The artist was so grateful that he presented me with the painting, and I still have it. When it was brought to my house, my old dog was present with the family at the ' unveiling'; nothing was said to him nor invitation given him to notice it. We saw that his gaze was steadily fixed on it, and he soon became excited, and whined, and tried to lick and scratch it, and was so much taken up with it, that we — although so well knowing his intelligence — were all quite surprised; in fact, could scarcely believe that he should know it was my like ness. We, however, had sufficient proof after it was hung up in our parlour. The room was rather low, and under the picture stood a chair; the door was left open without any thought about the dog ; he, however, soon found it out, when a low whining and scratching was heard by the family, and on search o NATURE STUDIES. being made, lie was [found to be] in the chair trying to get at the picture. After this I put it up higher, so as to prevent its being injured by him. This did not prevent him from paying attention to it, for when- ever I was away from home, whether for a long or short time — sometimes for several days — he spent most of his time gazing on it, and as it appeared to give him comfort, the door was always left open for him. When I was long away he made a low whining, as if to draw attention to it. This lasted for years, in fact so long as he lived and was able to see it. I have never kept a dog since he died ; I dare not, his loss so much affected me." A similar anecdote is related of a painting by the elder Phillips. " Many years ago," says the lady who narrates the tale, ffmy husband had his portrait taken by T. Phillips, sen., R.A., and subsequently went to India, leaving the portrait in London to be finished and framed. When it was sent home, about two years after it was taken, it was placed on the floor against the sofa, preparatory to being hung on the wall. We had then a very handsome, large, black-and-tan setter, which was a great pet in the house. As soon as the dog came into the room, he recognised his master, though he had not seen him for two years, and went up to the picture and licked the face. When this anecdote was told to Phillips, he said it was the highest compliment that had ever been paid to him." We have seen how a bull-dog, the least intelli- gent, perhaps, of all dogs, behaved in presence of a INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 195 portrait. We have now to consider the behaviour, under similar circumstances, of the British mastiff, a more intelligent animal than the bull-dog, though not regarded as standing by any means first among dogs in this respect. The particular mastiff in question is one to whom I had the pleasure of being introduced some five years since, Dr. Huggins's dog Kepler. He is worthy of a brief biographical sketch. He was a son (that is, Kepler was) of the celebrated Turk, and was born about the year 1871. " He stands," wrote Mrs. Huggins of him, towards the close of 1876, a few months before his lamented decease, " thirty inches high, and is lion colour on the body; his face, the tips of his ears, and the tip of his tail, are marked with black. In disposition he is usually exceedingly affectionate and gentle, though he can be otherwise. Probably he thinks [though here I must confess that, strongly though Mrs. Huggins's opinion would sup- port my case, I cannot altogether agree with her] that the words of George Herbert may apply to dogs as well »& to men, and so reasons that — He is a fool who cannot be angry, But lie is a wise dog who will not. He has a clear idea of his duty in life. As Mr. Carlyle would say, ' he has found his work to do/ and consi- ders it to be — to borrow the expression of an old writer — fto kepe his mastre and his maistirs hous/ To this end he is continually on the watch, barking in quite different ways as different comers approach' He has a bark of welcome for those he loves ; of cour- o2 196 NATURE STUDIES. tesy for mere acquaintances; of inquiry for strangers;, of warning against enemies/' an approach here, ons may say, to language. Kepler first attracted scientific attention by a pecu- liarity which, most probably, must be regarded as a result of instinct, or as, at any rate, inherited, sine 3 nothing in Kepler's own life explains it as the result of any process of reasoning. "When he/' that is Kepler, "was very young/' writes Mrs. Huggins, " his master discovered on taking him for a walk one day, that he " (Kepler, not Dr. Huggins) " was very much frightened at the sight of a butcher's shop, and some little time afterwards, when he was out with a servant, the feeling again showed itself, but in a much more marked manner. On this occasion Kepler threw himself upon the ground near the butcher's, exhibiting every appearance of terror, and as no amount of coaxing could induce him to pass the shop, the servant was at last obliged to bring him home again. His master, upon this, wrote to Mr. Nicholls, from whom he had purchased Kepler, asking if he could throw any light upon this strange dislike. Mr. Nicholls replied that it had been strongly marked in Kepler's father and grandfather, and was unusually strong in one of his brothers, so much so, indeed, that he would fly at a butcher, even when dressed in* plain clothes. These facts being very striking, Dr. Huggins — Kepler's master — wrote details of them to Mr. Darwin, who was so much interested, considering the circum- stances a clear instance of inherited antipathy, that. INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 197 •he sent an account of them to Nature. The facts attracted much attention at the time, and various theories were put forward to explain them. In con- nexion with this dislike to butchers shown by Kepler and his relations, it is interesting to notice that a similar antipathy is noted by Jesse to dog-killers, as mentioned both by Lord Bacon (rSylva Sylvarum'), and Sir Kenelm Digby (' Treatise on the Nature of Bodies '), as having been common among dogs in their times. The passage from Sir Kenelm Digby's Treatise runs thus : ' We daily see that dogs will have an aversion from glovers, that make their ware of •dogs' skin ; they will bark at and be churlish to them, and not endure to come near them, though they never saw them before/ Dog-killing was an old custom in August." Perhaps, after all, this intense aversion to butchers, dog-killers, and others who may be supposed .to bear about them some scent of blood, suggesting to the dog-mind the slaughter of his kindred, may be an effect of reasoning, not, as I have suggested above, of instinct only. A dog may argue that the scent can only be explained in one way, and that the explana- tion is such as to suggest danger to himself — " Mnc illce lachrymce." Kepler's (the mastiff's) claim to be looked upon as ,a reasoning dog may be regarded by some as being better based, perhaps, on what his master and mis- tress described as actual mathematical calculations. " Kepler/' says the latter, " like his great namesake, as an excellent mathematician. Many distinguished I98 NATURE STUDIES. men have been delighted with his performances in this direction. The mode of procedure is this : His master tells him to sit down,, and shows him a piece of cake. He is then questioned., and barks his answers. Say he is asked what is the square root of 16 or of 9 ; he will bark three or four times, as the case may be. Or such a sum as ' 6 + 12 — 3 divided by 5/ he will always answer correctly: more prolonged calculations rather fatigue him. The piece of cake is, of course, the meed of such cleverness. It must not be supposed that in these performances any sign is consciously made by his questioner. None whatever. We explain the performance by supposing that he reads in his master's expression when he has barked rightly: certainly he never takes his eyes from his master's face/' A singular performance, and one showing that some dogs possess not only keen vision, but keener powers of perception than most men. It would, how- ever, be a mistake to regard Kepler's performance as illustrating the possession of actual reasoning power by animals. For certainly the calculations he seemed to conduct were conducted in reality by his master. This intelligent animal showed excellent judgment when a large photograph of one of Landseer's dogs (that is, a photograph of a dog pictured by Landseer) was shown him. He showed his perception of the painter's skill by at once distinctly recognising that the photograph represented a strange dog, of whom, by-the-way, he manifested decided jealousy. Kepler knew the meaning of many words. He recognised INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 199 clearly when his master was ill, and showed at such time real concern and sympathy. "He was exceedingly kind and unselfish to a little English terrier, called ' Tycho Brahe 9 " l (I quote again from Mrs. Huggins's interesting little sketch ; only, as Kepler is dead, I change the tense in these few last sentences from the present to the past), " who often tried him, and to a very unamiable cat, who both formed part of the household in which he dwelt. Altogether, there was in Kepler's every look, and motion, and utterance, a noble and intelligent individuality which endeared him to all who knew him. Much might be learnt from him in many ways ; and he was indeed worthy of a large share of an inclusive love — that love which loveth ' All tilings both great and small.' " The question whether animals can count in any way, or discriminate, at any rate, between different numbers, is one about which different opinions have been expressed. We cannot consider that the question was answered (affirmatively) by Kepler's achievements, though he seemed to do more than count. On the other hand, the common opinion that a bird, whose nest has been robbed of all the eggs but one, is as well content with that one as with the entire set, is not supported by evidence, and, indeed, seems to have been devised to comfort the consciences of those who 1 Tycho Brahe (the dog, not the astronomer) was commonly called by Dr. Huggins, Tyko Barky. 200 NATURE STUDIES. like to go birds'-nesting, but might be troubled with regret for the troubles of the parent birds, were it not for this ingenious theory. We all remember the remonstrance of Tom Brown, when East proposed to take all four of the eggs in the nest robbed by Martin, " No, no ! leave one, and then she won't care/' said Tom. " We boys," says the author, " had an idea that birds couldn't count, and were quite content as long as you left one egg. I hope it is so." However this may be with birds (and, on the whole, I incline to think even penguins, "boobies" though sailors call them, have some idea of the number of their eggs), the following story seems to show that dogs can count their young. " To my friend, Dr. Velasquez Level, a respectable physician of this city," writes M. A. Ernst, of Caracas ; " and for several years a resident of the island of Margarita, I am indebted for the following touching instance of the sagacity of a bitch. Her owner, for some reason or other, had destroyed all the female puppies in two successive litters. On her having brought forth a third one, it was found that there were but three male puppies. The bitch, how- ever, was observed to leave her whelps occasionally, and to return some time after. Being followed, she was discovered suckling three female puppies, which she had hidden under some brushwood, undoubtedly with the intention of saving them from the master's cruel hands." This, perhaps, is the most striking of all the cases we have yet considered. It would seem that when the female puppies of the first litter were INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 2QI destroyed, the mother either did not recognise the circumstance that all the male puppies were left, or else regarded it as merely accidental; for otherwise she would probably have tried with the second litter the plan she actually tried with the third. When the female puppies of the second litter were taken, she recognised the rule by which selection had been made. Thus she had up to this point reasoned well and with due caution, not adopting a conclusion until the evidence in its favour had become very strong and convincing. She had also shown a power of counting ; for obvious though the result she obtained may seem to one of ourselves, capable of dealing readily with much larger numbers, yet if we conceive a mind so far inferior in matters of calculation to that of a savage (and such savages are known) who can scarce count up to five, and has to run through a process of calculation before he can say how many children he has, as the mind of such a savage is to that of a skilful mathematician, we see that to such a mind the process gone through by the animal in this case would be what a very profound calculation would be to tho mathematician. In other words, we here have evidence that the difference between the mind of an animal and the mind of man is but one of degree, and that the animal is not more widely separated from man in this respect, than the lowest among men is from the highest. 202 MATURE STUDIES. EXAMPLES OF ANIMAL INTELLIGENCE. As the preceding article passed through Knowledge, many interesting letters were received. The following are selected from among these : — It is a common delusion, founded upon imperfect information, that animals guided by instinct do not modify their proceedings by reason, but persevere in a mechanical repetition of the same acts. Probably no creature with a complex nervous system that was observed with sufficient attention, under a variety of conditions, would be found so deficient in intelligence as this theory imagines. At any rate, it completely breaks down when applied to our common birds, and quite fails to explain the kind of facts to be narrated concerning the house martin. A cottage of many gables, situated on the slope of a wide heath, was for many years the favourite resort of this sociable bird, and in one season as many as thirteen nests were established. Now, according to the instinct theory, they ought to have been all alike, but in eleven cases there were obvious differences, some slight in appear- ance, but probably all-important for the stability of the erection or the comfort of its inhabitants. The simplest nest was quite open at the top, sheltered by projecting eaves, and very roughly finished at the margin. Another variety was built quite up to the woodwork, and had a side entrance left in the rough. INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 203 Others had similar side entrances, neatly finished with a rounded border. On a north-western gable, quite on its top corner, repeated efforts had been made to construct a nest which would brave the storm winds, and after several failures and mendings, a sort of but- tress was stuck on below, evidently a new idea. On the southern side, a favourite locality was under a projecting window, sufficiently high above the sill of a lower window that no cat could reach it by a jump. In this situation the birds built twin nests — semi- attached houses, and they placed their doorways close to the wall on opposite sides, so that when looking at them, the left abode had its entrance on the extreme left, and tho right one on the extreme right. If the entrances had been in any other position, the birds might have jostled in going in and out. The walls of the cottage being rough cast, offered a good founda- tion, but there is no tenacious clay near, and the martin architects were never quite successful with two of the highest gables, possibly on that account. Mis- chievous sparrows occasionally stole a nest, but the right birds were generally very comfortable, and reared their broods prosperously. It was, therefore, a matter of surprise that, after coming for many suc- cessive years, repairing old nests, and making new ones, they merely looked at the place, and did nothing in the summer of 1881. The weather was unfavour- able, the birds arrived late, and prepared houses some way off, perhaps from their offering more sheltered situations. Towards the close of the martin season, 2O4 NATURE STUDIES. the custom of the old birds for many years was to give the young ones some building lessons, and lines of foundation, several feet long, were usually attached to the cottage walls. Some of them served for the com- mencement of nests in the following season, but most •of them seemed merely school exercises. If these nets were all done under blind instinct, there is a kind of blindness much like seeing, and it may be doubted whether the mud huts of the poor Irishmen exhibit much more intelligence than the martin's homes. HENRY J. SLACK. It strikes me that human beings might, perhaps, improve their " intelligence " by trying to acquire a curious habit possessed by some animals, especially the dog. I allude to the way they have of saving themselves up, so to speak, when not on duty, which nearly every one must have noticed, and which the following instance will illustrate : — They have, at my father's house, a small black-and-tan terrier, Toby III., who has taken upon himself the duty of escorting all strangers to the door on their leaving the house. On the slightest sign of a departure, Toby, although lying on the sofa snoring and apparently fast asleep, in- stantly starts up in a fearful state of excitement, and with every appearance of undying fury and hatred, fairly screams the visitor out. In less than a quarter of a minute he is once more comfortably asleep. It would be interesting to know how dogs have acquired this enviable knack of disengaging their attention INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 205 wlien not required ; perhaps it is partly because they are, unlike " the literary gentleman/' not <( exposed to much anxiety respecting family matters." Some time ago a friend brought us a small terrier,, under the impression that it was our Toby that had got lost. It was an amiable little creature, and, un- like Toby, willing to make friends with any one. On being noticed it would look up, shake its head, and actually laugh with satisfaction. If laughter be a sign of intelligence — and it is an attribute generally sup- posed to be confined to the most intelligent of all animals,' man — our little friend must have been quite an ' ' infant phenomenon." This is the first instance J know about of a dog laughing ; but my wife assures me they had a dog which, although bold and courageous, would, on being left in the house aloner cry " real tears/' just like a child. - J. H. The strategic shifts of Colonel Perkins' (Pur tons' ?) dog, Bully, at Bangalore, remind me of another story connected with Bangalore. The late Rev. William Campbell, who was formerly a missionary there, on visiting Dublin, to advocate the claims of the London Missionary Society, went with some friends to see the Zoological Gardens in that city. While walking through the gardens, their attention was drawn to a particular den by the excitement of a smal[ crowd before it. On approaching the place, they found it was the den of the Indian bear. Bruin was 206 NATURE STUDIES. in a bad humour, and sat resolutely on his haunches, with his back to his visitors. Some tried to coax him with buns, others to startle him with shouts, and a few tried to stir him up with walking-sticks and umbrellas. All their efforts were in vain. At last it occurred to Mr. Campbell to address the bear in the language he was accustomed to in his youth, so he shouted " Cuddapah ! Cuddapah ! " (Get up ! Get up !) To the surprise and amusement of the specta- tors, Bruin immediately turned round with a delighted Srin' CUDDAPAH. While at the University, taking my medical course, the facts I relate took place. Among other appurte- nances to the department of physiological chemistry was a dog with a gastric fistula, which fistula was properly healed around a silver tube having an internal and external flange to keep it in place. The tube was stopped by a closely-fitted cork, except at such times as we needed a supply of gastric juice. The fistula caused the animal no disturbance whatever. He was well and hearty, was fed at and made his home at the medical department. During the summer vacation, however, when the University was closed, he was transferred to the care of the surgeon, who took him to his house. During his frolics one day he jumped over a fence, striking it, and dislodged the cork in the tube. Ponto soon noticed that his food didn't seem to satisfy him, and that all he drank ran out of his stomach on to the INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 207 ground. His master having gone away for several days — fishing — he must needs take care of himself, so immediately on eating or drinking anything, he ran to his bed in the carriage-house close by, turned on his back, and remained so for an hour or more, or until he felt satisfied that it would do for him to get up. Coaxing, threatening, and kicking by the domestics about the house, or by those whose attention was called to his actions, were alike unavailing to drive him from his place or from his supine position. Finally, some one who knew for what purposes the dog was used, examined his fistula, and found the cork gone. This being restored, he was soon per- suaded to go about as usual, and indicated by his actions that he understood that everything was all right. This incident can be vouched for by many reliable persons. Who will say that dogs — at least one dog — cannot reason ? F. L. BAKDEEN, M.D. At one time our family rejoiced in the possession of five cats. One a magnificent black animal, assumed the air and dignity of chief amongst them, and was deferred to on all occasions by the other members of the feline community. One day I detected him in the commission of an outrageous attack on a juvenile member of the fraternity, and at once expressed my disapprobation in a most vigorous manner, chasing the culprit about the room, under" chairs and tables, till he suddenly disappeared^. 208 NATURE STUDIES. I listened a moment to catch any sound that might betray his whereabouts, and suddenly heard the latch of the kitchen-door fall. I rushed into the kitchen just in time to see Tom slide his forepaw between the door and the jamb, forcing the door open and leaping out into the garden, thence on to the top of a high wall, from which "bad eminence" he regarded me with a placid and unctuous look of injured innocence. He had opened the door by jumping on to a small shelf near, from whence, by standing up on his hind legs, he could reach the latch and push it up with hi& forepaw, thus releasing the door, which then swung partially open. The rest, to a cat of " Sweep's " intelligence, was easy. I often afterwards watched him do it. He never succeeded (though he often tried) in opening the door from the outside, because there was nothing sufficiently near the latch on which he could stand while he pressed the thumb-piece of the latch downwards, a proceeding the necessity for which he evidently thoroughly understood, as evidenced by the way in which his attempts to open the door on the outside were made. He would leap up and catch hold of the latch-guard with one paw, while with the other he frantically struck (downwards) at the thumb-piece, continuing his efforts till his strength for the moment failed him, and he dropped to the ground. He never asked any one to open the door for him. If he wanted to get out, he opened it and went out ; if he wanted to come in, he tried to open it, and con- tinued trying (the idea of ultimate failure never INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 209 •apparently, entering his head) till the noise or his successive failures attracted notice and brought help. We had several times been annoyed by joints of meat having been gnawed, and often found on the floor of the cellar; of course the cat, about three- quarters grown, was rightly blamed as being the delinquent. The maid repeatedly denied having left the cellar door open, but was for some time dis- believed, and I am sorry to say blamed, until one night, going into the kitchen after the family had retired, I found pussy, naught abashed, busily pawing away at the thumb-piece of the latch. I left her for a short time, and on returning found the cellar door open, and pussy busy with the meat. On examination I found the door would immediately swing open on the lever of the latch being pressed. Next day I had a spring put to the latch, and, needless to say, pussy has not troubled since, though it is not for the want of trying. She still lets herself into the kitchen from the garden — the outer door having a similar latch, climbing up the verandah until level with the latch, and pawing away industriously until the door swings open. JOHN HUMPHREY. Correspondents of Knoivledge, in treating of cats, •do not seem to have remarked some acts of intelli- gence which may be observed daily in the streets of London. At the cry of the cat's-meat man all the cats are in commotion, but all are not excited by the p 210 NATURE STUDIES. cry of the same man. A dozen men may walk up and down the same street with the tempting morsels, crying "meat, meat! " but only at those houses which they are accustomed to serve will the cats be roused by the call. No sooner does the proper man arrive in the street than every cat he is accustomed to serve rushes frantically to the door, or, if allowed, into the street, running mewing towards him, rubbing against his legs, or sometimes sitting in a begging attitude before him, but never, as far as I have observed,, attempting to steal from the open basket. One day I noticed a cat whose man had either for- gotten her portion or had been unable to make her mistress hear, and so had passed on. The cat, how- ever, insisted on being attended to ; she ran after him, mewing piteously, and when at last she made him understand, she ran back to the house before him, where by that time the mistress was ready to take the delicacy so much prized by all London cats, how- ever well fed. I have often watched this act of discrimination in our own cat. Tom would sit quietly dozing whilst man after man went by with the f amilar cry of " Meat, meat I" but presently he would jump up, rush to the window, and remain in a state of great excitement, and soon after a distant cry of "Meat !'r might be heard, and we knew that Tom had recognised his own man long before we had heard him. As the cry drew nearer, Tom's excitement increased, and he would almost fly to the door. A singular fact remains to be told. On Saturdays the man would leave two INTELLIGENCE IN ANIMALS. 211 portions, as lie did not go his rounds on Sundays. These were often thrown into the area, to which Tom had access. He would always greedily devour the one portion, but never touch the other, although they lay side by side. This cat would also open the latch of the kitchen-door, as observed by several of your correspondents, and would also open the shutters in the drawing-room (closed but not fastened), in order to look out of window. I have, however, been told of a cat who would open not only a latch, but an ordinary drawing-room door, rather loose, by taking the round knob between her paws and twisting it round and round till it opened. The fact of cats distinguishing between one meat man and another seems to me to disprove the oft- repeated assertion that cats attach themselves only to places, and not to persons ; for here we see them able to pick out a certain man by his voice alone, even at a great distance. A. W. BUCKLAND. During a recent passage over the North Sea, a flock of sea-gulls followed the steamer for many miles. At last I noticed that one of them, a remarkably fine bird, had, by some chance, got an angler's line attached to its wing. The poor thing flew about the rigging, its companions, meanwhile, uttering loud cries. After great cawing, the bird flew quickly towards the ship dashed round one of the ropes several times, and ultimately flew off, leaving the line twisted round the rope. GEO. B. FKASEE. p 2 212 NATURE STUDIES. OUR ANCESTORS. BY GRANT ALLEN. I.— THE STONE AGE MEN. THERE ave few questions more immediately interesting to Englishmen than the question — who are our .ances- tors ? From what elements and in what proportions are we compounded ? May we consider ourselves as nil pure Teutons ? or are we partly Celts as well ? Furthermore, may we even reckon among our imme- diate ancestry some still earlier and less historical races than either of these ? Such questions are full of practical importance to ourselves, and they are also of a sort upon which modern investigations into language and the science of man have cast a strikingly new and unexpected light. Of course, in considering the origin of Englishmen, we must look at the matter in no petty provincial spirit. We must include roughly in that general name Welshmen, Scotchmen, and Irishmen as well ; and if our friends in the north prefer to speak of Britain rather than of England, I am sure I, for my part, will have no objection. There are many learned modern histo- rians, with Mr. Freeman at their head, who will tell us that Englishmen are almost pure-blooded Teutons, of the same original stock as the Germans, the Dutch, and the Danes and Norwegians. But when we come OUR ANCESTORS. 213 to inquire more fully into their meaning, it turns out that they are speaking only of the native inhabitants of England proper and the Scotch Lowlands, without taking into consideration at all the people of Wales, Ireland, and the Highlands, or the numerous de- scendants of immigrants from those districts into the south-eastern half of Great Britain. Even in the restricted England itself, these same doughty Teutonic advocates admit that there is a nearly pure Celtic (or pre-Celtic) population in Cornwall, in Cumberland, and in Westmoreland ; while the western half of the Low- lands, from Glasgow to the border, is also allowed to be inhabited by a mainly Welsh race. Furthermore, it is pretty generally granted by our stoutest Teutonic champions themselves, that the people of Dorset, Somerset, and Devon, of Lancashire, Cheshire, Shrop- shire, Herefordshire, and Worcestershire, are all largely mingled with Celtic blood. Thus, in the end, it appears that only the native inhabitants of the Lothian s and the Eastern and Southern coast of England are claimed as pure Teutons, even by those who most loudly assert the essentially Teutonic origin of the English people. We may possibly find that this little Teutonic belt or border itself is not without a fair sprinkling of earlier blood. Perhaps the best way to clear up this question will be to glance briefly at the various races which have inhabited these islands, one after another, and then to inquire how far their descendants still exist in our midst, how large a proportion of our blood they have 214 NATURE STUDIES. contributed, and whereabouts their representatives are now mainly to be found. Of course, in such an inquiry we can only arrive at very approximate results, for in our present advanced stage of inter- mixture, it is almost impossible for any man to say exactly what are the proportions of various races, even in his own person. Each of us is descended from two parents, four grand-parents, eight great-grand- parents, and so forth; so that, unless we could hunt up our pedigrees in every direction for ten genera- tions, involving a knowlege of no less than 1,024 ^ifferent persons at the tenth stage backward, we could not even say how far we ourselves were descended from Irish, Scotch, Welsh, or English ancestors respectively. As a matter of fact, every one of us is now, probably, a very mixed product indeed of Teutonic, Celtic, and still earlier elements, which we cannot practically unravel; and, perhaps, all we can really do is to point out that here one kind of blood is predominant, there another, and yonder again a third. "The men of the very earliest race that ever lived in England are probably not in any sense our ancestors. They were those black-fellows of the paleolithic or older stone age, whose flint implements and other remains we find buried in the loose earth of the river- drift or under the concreted floors of caves, and who dwelt in Britain while it was yet a part of the main- land, with a cold climate like that of modern Siberia. These people seem to have lived before and between OUR ANCESTORS. 2I$ the recurrent cold cycles of the great glacial period; and they were probably all swept away by the last of those long chilly spells, when almost the whole of England was covered by vast sheets of glaciers, like Greenland in our own time. Since their days, Britain has been submerged beneath several hundred feet of sea, raised again, joined to the continent, and once more finally separated from it by the English Channel and the Straits of Dover. Meanwhile, bur own original an- cestors— the people from whom by long modification we ourselves are at last descended — were probably living away in the warmer south, and there developing the higher physical and intellectual powers by which they were ultimately enabled to overrun the whole northern part of the old world. Accordingly, interesting as these older stone-age savages undoubtedly are — low-browed, fierce-jawed, crouching creatures, inferior even to the existing Australians or Andaman Islanders— they have no proper place in a pedigree of the modern English people. They were the aboriginal inhabitants of Britain ; but their blood is probably quite unrepre- sented among the Englishmen of the present day. Long after these black-fellows, however, and long after the glaciers of the ice age had cleared off the face of the country, a second race occupied Britain, some of whose descendants almost undoubtedly exist in our midst at the present day. These were the neolithic, or later stone-age, men, who have 'been identified, with great probability, as a branch of the same isolated Basque or Euskarian race which now 2l6 NATURE STUDIES. lives among the valleys of the Western Pyrenees and the Asturias mountains. They seem to have crossed over into Britain while still it was connected with the Continent by a broad isthmus, or, perhaps, even by a long stretch of land occupying the entire beds of the Channel and the German Ocean. Our knowledge of them is mainly derived from their tombs or barrows — great heaps of earth which they piled up above the bodies of their dead chieftains. From these have been taken- their skeletons, their weapons, their domestic utensils, and their ornaments, all the latter objects having been buried with the corpse, for the use of the ghost in the other world. From an examination of these remains, we are able largely to reconstruct the life of the Euskarian people — the earliest inhabitants of Britain whose blood is still largely represented in the existing population. In stature, the neolithic men were short and thick- set, not often exceeding five feet four inches. In com- plexion, they were probably white, but swarthy, like the darkest Italians and Spaniards, or even the Moors. Their skulls were very long and narrow ; and they form the best distinguishing mark of the race, as well as the best test of its survival at the present day* The neoliths were unacquainted with the use of metal,, but they employed weapons and implements of stone, not rudely chipped, like those of the older stone age, but carefully ground and polished. They made pot- tery, too, and wove cloth ; they domesticated pigs and cattle ; and they cultivated coarse cereals in the little OUR ANCESTORS. 217 plots wliicli they cleared out of the forest with their stone hatchets or tomahawks. In general culture, they were about at the same level as the more advanced Polynesian tribes, when they first came into contact with European civilisation. The barrows which they raised over their dead chieftains were long and rather narrow, not round, like those of the later Celtic con- querors. They appear to have lived for the most part in little stockaded villages, each occupying a small clearing in the river valleys, and ruled over by a single chief : and the barrows usually cap the summit of the boundary hills which overlook the little dales. Inside them are long chambered galleries of large, rough-hewn stones; and when these primitive erec- tions are laid bare by the decay or removal of the barrow, they form the so-called "Druidical monu- ments" of old-fashioned antiquaries, a few of which are Celtic, but the greater part Euskariau. At some future period I hope to lay before the readers of Knowledge a fuller account of these neo- lithic people and their existing remains. At present, the points to which I wish to call attention are r firstly, the fact of their existence in early days in Britain ; and, secondly, the fact that many of their descendants still remain among us to the present day. Nor do I propose in this paper to estimate the numeri- cal strength of the Euskarian element in the popula- tion of the British islands as it now stands. It will be best to consider that part of the question at a later point in this series, when we have seen what were 2i8 NATURE STUDIES. the subsequent races which overcame, and in part displaced, the aboriginal Euskarian folk. For the moment, it will suffice to point out that before the arrival of the Celts and other Aryan tribes in Britain, these Euskarians spread over the whole of our islands, and were apparently the only people then inhabiting them. At least, the monuments of this date — perhaps from 5,000 to 20,000 years old — seem to be similar in type wherever they occur in Britain, and to contain the remains of an essentially identical race. I shall also add here, by anticipation, what I hope to show more in detail hereafter, that their descendants exist almost unmixed at the present day as the so-called Black Celts in certain parts of Western Ireland and Scot- land, and in a few places in South Wales ; while their blood may still be traced in a more mixed condition in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, East Anglia, the Scotch Highlands, and many other districts of England and Scotland. How they have managed to survive and to •outlive the various later Celtic and Teutonic conquests, we shall have 'to inquire when we come to consider the origin and progress of those subsequent waves of population. II.— THE CELTS. WHILE the dark - haired and dark - skinned little Euskarians were living unmolested- in the western coasts and islands of Europe — hewing patches out of the forest with their stone hatchets, building great barrows over their dead chieftains, and fighting among OUR ANCESTOBS. 219 themselves from valley to valley, like the North American Indians of later days — a fairer and taller race was growing up unnoticed away to the east, among the great central table-lands of the Asiatic plateau. This fair-skinned, yellow-haired, and blue- eyed folk is known to us by the somewhat fanciful name of Aryans ; and from it the chief conquering peoples of the whole Eastern hemisphere are derived. The Aryans spoke a language whose nature we can infer from the numerous modern dialects derived from it ; and this language enables us in part to form some conception of the state of culture attained by the people who used it. In their earliest known condition, while they still all lived together among the high plains of Asia, they were hardly, if at all, superior in the arts of life to the Euskarians of Britain. They were ignorant of the use of metals, and armed only with weapons of polished stone. They fed their flocks like the semi-nomad tribes which still inhabit the same region, and they tilled a little grain of some coarse cereal kind. Altogether, if we regard them with calmly impartial eyes, and not with the excessive filial piety of some German thinkers, we shall probably be forced to admit that the primitive Aryans were, on the whole, about as good and as bad as most other barbaric peoples at the same period of the world's history. Stronger than the neighbouring nations they certainly showed themselves to be, but wiser or better there is no sufficient reason to suppose that they were. 220 NATURE STUDIES. From their original Central Asian home, these warlike Aryans began to disperse themselves as fighting colonists on every side, probably some five or six thousand years since. One great branch, now speaking the Celtic variety of the common language, moved westward across the face of Central Europe ; and its members spread themselves, long before the beginning of written history, over all the western coasts of the continent as a conquering and superior race. Though at first they were only armed, like the Euskarians amongst whom they came, with stone hatchets and flint-tipped arrows, yet, as they were tall, big-limbed, powerful men, while the Euskarians were comparatively short, squat, defenceless folk, they seem easily to have overrun almost the whole of what is now France, Spain, and the Low Countries, and to have established themselves, at least as a rough aristocracy of chieftains, among the conquered and servile Euskarian population. But in some places the Euskarians, and their kinsfolk the Ligurians and Aquitanians, appear to have maintained their inde- pendence; while in others, though the Celts were masters, the dark-skinned aboriginal people yet sur- vived in vast numbers. It was only in the most thoroughly conquered parts of the continent that the pure-blooded Celts themselves formed the principal mass of the population. The independent dark tribes of the extreme west retained their native language, which lives on to our own time as the Basque tongue ; but the vanquished and enslaved Euskarians of the OUR ANCESTORS. 221 central French and Spanish regions learned to speak the dialect of their Celtic lords, as they afterwards learned to speak that of their Roman conquerors. As yet the Celts had not attempted to attack Britain, which had long since been isolated from, the continent, and could now only be invaded by a fleet of boats crossing the silver streak of sea. Before they took that last step in the conquest of Western Europe, they had learned the use of bronze, from which they manufactured beautiful axes, spears, and shields, besides producing many tools for more peaceable purposes. The employment of bronze enabled the Celts to make such improvements in ship -building that they could cross the Channel to Britain, which they found inhabited only by the small dark Euskarians, who were now at a still greater disadvantage, seeing that they were only armed with stone tomahawks, while their big assailants were armed with " weapons of precision/' in the shape of bronze battle-axes, lances, and spears. The consequence was that the Celts soon overran nearly the whole island, and quickly subdued the better part of it to their own dominion. In the south-eastern plains, near the continent, they apparently settled in great numbers, so that when the Romans came they found that part of Britain mainly inhabited by a tall, fair-haired, light-skinned Aryan Celtic race. But in the west, the Celts only settled in comparatively small numbers, as lords of the soil, holding in subjection a large servile population of dark Euskarians ; while in South Wales, and apparently in 222 NATVEE STUDIES. parts of the Scotch Highlands, the dark people remained wholly independent, as the inhabitants of those regions long afterwards did at the time of the English settlement. The South Welsh tribe of Euskarians were known as Silures, and they preserved their nationality intact down to the period of the Eoman Conquest. Now, what sort of people were the pure-blooded Celts who first came to Britain ? No doubt ifc may be a shock to many readers to be told so, but they were undoubtedly a light-skinned, fair-haired, blue-eyed, and round-headed race — in fact, typical Aryans of the same sort as the modern Germans, and possessed of exactly those peculiarities which we ordinarily speak of as Anglo-Saxon. About this there can be no manner of mistake. Their barrows, known both by their shape and by their bronze implements, contain round skulls, quite different from the long skulls of the Euskarians ; and the universal testimony of the Roman writers, whose knowledge of the Celts was obtained while they still lived in comparative purity in Gaul and south-eastern Britain, makes it quite certain that they had light hair, white skin, and blue eyes. How, then, comes it that most of us think of the Celtic type as essentially dark and black-haired ? The reason is simply this. When the Celts conquered Britain, they left large numbers of Euskarians alive, in the northern and western part of the island, at least ; and it is the mixed Celtic and Euskarian descendants of these people who now form the OUR ANCESTORS. 22$ so-called Celts of the Highlands, Lancashire, North Wales, and Cornwall. Moreover, it is certain that the Euskarians of the conquered districts soon learned to speak Celtic alone, just as the Irish are now fast learning to speak English alone ; and so after a short; time they became as indistinguishable from the true Celts, as Normans and Danes in England have become indistinguishable from the rest of the community. Even the Silures, who maintained their position as an independent Euskarian tribe in South Wales, seem to have acquired the use of the Celtic Welsh tongue before the date of the Roman invasion. When con- trasted with the Teutonic English, all these Celtic- speaking peoples came naturally at a later period to be regarded as Celts. Thus, at the date when Britain first became known to the civilised southern world by the Mediterranean, and before any Englishmen had yet settled in the land, its ethnical arrangement was something of this sort : Along the southern and eastern plains, from Hampshire, by Sussex and Kent to East Anglia, Lincolnshire, and the vale of Yorkshire, there lived a light Aryan Celtic race, with more or less of subject or enslaved Euskarians — doubtless, a good deal inter- mixed, as negroes, mulattoes, quadroons, and whites, still are in the Southern States and the West Indies, though the light Celtic aristocracy probably kept up the purity of its own blood in the female line, as also happens in the analogous modern case. Further west and further north, among the hills of the Devonian 224 NATURE STUDIES. peninsula, the West Riding, Cumberland, and the Highlands, the number of pure Celts was comparatively smaller, while the number of dark Euskarians was comparatively greater. And in Wales itself, the Silures remained as unmixed Euskarians, without a single drop of Aryan Celtic blood; while another small Euskarian principality seems also to have held out in the Athol district of Scotland. It is this com- pound mass of pure Celts, mixed Celt-Euskarians, .and pure Euskarians, all speaking various Celtic dialects, that we ordinarily describe as Celtic, in contradistinction to the Teutonic English, who came to the country at a later date. As to Ireland, the primitive Celtic immigration there was very slight • and the mass of the population, though it acquired the Gaelic dialect of Celtic as its language, remained almost entirely Euskarian in blood up to the date of the Danish invasions, as it still remains in all except the northern and eastern coast. How far these arrangements of the various race-elements were upset by the English (or Anglo-Saxon) settlement, we shall have to inquire in our next paper. III.— THE TEUTONS. IT does not seem likely that the Roman occupation left much permanent mark upon the ethnology of Britain. So far as we can judge, the Romans held the soil very much as we ourselves hold India — by a purely military tenure. A little sprinkling of Italian OUR ANCESTORS. 22$ blood may perhaps have been indirectly introduced by the legionaries, though comparatively few even of these were really Roman. Most of them were Gauls, Spaniards, Germans, and Low Dutch peoples ; and their influence could only have been felt, ethnographi- cally speaking, in the immediate neighbourhood of the military stations, where a few half-breeds may have mingled scantily here and there with the native population. A more important result of the conquest, however, would doubtless be found in the general amalgamation of the older Celtic and Euskarian ele- ments under stress of the new overlords. There is reason to believe that the greater number of Britons sank into the position of serfs, either employed on the great corn farms into which the land was parcelled out, or in the mines of Cornwall, Sussex, and the Forest of Dean. This grinding and levelling system of slavery must have pressed pretty equally upon Celts and Euskarians, light-haired Belgae and dark Silurians, the former conquerors and the former slaves. Confused together in such a common serf- dom, the two types seem to have coalesced, so that the lighter and numerically weaker Aryan Celts became practically almost merged into the darker and more numerous Euskarians. At least we know that ever since the Roman days, and down to modern times, the so-called Celts of Wales, Cornwall, and the Highlands are, for the most part, dark -haired and dark-skinned people of a more or less distinctly Euskarian physique, intermixed with comparatively q 226 NATURE STUDIES. few individuals of the 'true light Aryan type ; and, as the races were distinct in the days of Caesar and Tacitus, the coalescence probably took place during the period of the Roman occupation. After the Romans were gone, however, a second flood of Aryan immigration began to spread over the land. The new comers were the English and Saxons, two Teutonic tribes of Low Dutch pirates, who then inhabited Sleswick and the coasts of Hanover and Friesland. There is no doubt that the original English were a light-haired, light- skinned, blue-eyed people of the ordinary Aryan sort. They came over in small clans or families, and settled first on the east and south coasts, from the Frith of Forth to South- ampton Water, making their way, in most cases, into the interior, as was natural for pirates, by means of the inlets or estuaries. Whether the Teutons utterly exterminated the native Britons or not is a question that has been much debated from the histo- rical point of view ; and the weight of mere historical authority is certainly on the side of extirpation. Mr. Freeman and Canon Stubbs are both in favour of the belief that the early English conquerors killed off all the Britons — thab is to say, in terms of our present discussion, the mixed Celtic and Euskarian inhabitants of the Romanised province — while Mr. J. B. Green, the very latest writer on the subject, is of opinion that the Britons were simply driven off in the struggle, but not to any appreciable extent absorbed or en- slaved by the conquerors. From the anthropological OUR ANCESTORS. 22? point of view, however, such a belief is absolutely untenable. The existing English people is certainly not a pure Teutonic race, nor anything like one. It is a mixture, partly Teutonic, partly Celt-Eus- karian ; and to this fixed ethnological fact the history must somehow or other be accommodated. Every competent anthropologist, from the days of Phillips and Thurnam to the days of Professors Huxley and Eolleston, has consistently maintained that thesis. It is impossible to twist the evidence of plain modern facts to suit the supposed history, but it is very easy to reconstruct the history so as to accord with the existing facts. The earliest English settlements were undoubtedly made along the coasts of Kent, Sussex, East Anglia, and Yorkshire. In Sussex, it seems as though the Saxon invaders did really drive away almost all the " Welsh" into the forest of the Weald, where their descendants may still, perhaps, be found; but elsewhere the Britons appear to have been partially subdued and enslaved. In Kent, where a body of Jutes landed, the dark type is still quite common; while in old interments of the heathen age, Jute and Briton are still recognised side by side, the anatomical peculiari- ties of their skulls being distinctly recognisable to a technical eye. In the plain of Yorkshire, Professor Phillips long ago pointed out that two very different types of physique still prevail, the one tall and light, of English or Danish origin ; the other short, squat, dark, and black-eyed, of British or Euskarian origin. Q 2 228 NATUEE STUDIES. Similar dark people are also common among the sup- posed pure English of Lincolnshire and East Anglia ; while they are not infrequent in the oldest settled parts of Wessex, about Hampshire, Wiltshire, and the- Isle of Wight. In fact, there is good ethnological reason for believing that, even in this most English art of England, the first Teutons did not wholly drive away the Britons, but conquered and enslaved some of them. This belief is fully countenanced by the few historians who have handed down to us some meagre traditional account of the English set- tlement; for both the Welsh monk, Gildas, who wrote a hundred years after the landing of the English in Kent, and the English monk, Baeda, who wrote nearly a century later, inform us that some of the Britons gave themselves up as slaves to their con- querors. No doubt such slaves would be quickly Teutonised in creed, and Anglicised in speech; but from the ethnological point of view a Euskarian is a Euskarian still, whatever religion he may happen to profess, or whatever language he may happen to speak. His tongue or faith would produce no immediate change in the colour of his skin and eyes. To this day, indeed, the darker people in the east of England are mainly to be found among the peasantry. The midland districts of England were slowly con- quered by the English, setting out from their earliest colonies on the coast ; and as they moved inward, they appear to have spared more and more of the native Britons at each advance, and even to have substituted OUR ANCESTORS. 229 political subjugation for personal slavery. For example, it seems likely that the West Saxons landed in South- ampton Water about fifty years after the Jutish con- quest of Kent. They settled in Hampshire after some years' hard fighting, but more than half a century elapsed before they conquered Old Sarum and occupied Wiltshire. Still more slowly did they proceed across Dorset and Somerset, reaching Bath after nearly a century, Bradford after a century and a half, and Taunton after two centuries. In these two counties the proportion of Celt-Euskarian blood is very strong ; in Devon, which was only finally annexed more than three hundred years after the first landing, the Teutonic element even now represents a mere fraction. As to Cornwall, that of course retained even its Celtic speech till the last century, as some parts of Devon did till the reign of Queen Elizabeth. Indeed, Alfred the Great in his will describes all the people of Wilts, Somerset, Dorset, and Devon, as Welsh-kind. This one example will show the comparatively small amount of Teutonic blood that the English invasion actually brought into the country. It was just the same else- where. In the Severn valley, for instance, Welsh and English coalesced very early, and the people of Gloucestershire, Worcestershire, Shropshire, and Cheshire, belong very largely to the dark type, while those of Herefordshire and Monmouthshire are purely Welsh by blood. So in the north, a great Welsh kingdom of Strathclyde long held out between Glasgow and the Mersey, and T7hen at last it was conquered 230 NATUEE STUDIES. by the English of Northumbria, its people still re- mained upon the soil as subject inhabitants. To this day, the dark type is common in Lancashire, Ayrshire, and the hill districts of the West Hiding, though in Cumberland and "Westmoreland there is a large later infusion of light Scandinavian blood, about which more hereafter. Thus, the English occupation was really, to a great extent, rather a mere Teutonisatiou of Britain than, an extermination of the original Britons. The light Aryan stock, no doubt, received a large accession of strength ; but the dark Euskarian stock was not by any means annihilated or driven away. In Sussex, Essex, and the Lothians, the English seem to have settled very thickly, and to have spared very few of the native Britons, though we must remember that these parts were probably inhabited for the most part by fairly pure Celfcs (not Euskarians), whose descen- dants we cannot now discriminate from those of the equally Aryan Teutons. In Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, East Anglia, Kent, and Hampshire, the conquerors apparently enslaved a considerable number of the dark serfs whom they found upon the soil ; and their type is still preserved amongst the peasantry of those districts. As we move westward and inland, how- ever, we find 'fewer and fewer pure English, mixed with a larger and larger proportion of dark natives. In the eastern midlands, the light type is commonest. In the western midlands and the Severn valley, the dark type distinctly predominates. In Devonshire, OUR ANCESTORS. 231 Herefordshire, Lancashire, and Ayrshire, a few English overlords seem, after a long struggle, to have settled at last among a very large subject population. And finally, into Cornwall, "Wales, and the Highlands, the English never penetrated at all, except as purely political conquerors. But we must leave over for another paper the settlements of the Scandinavians in Scotland, the Lake district, and Ireland, as well as the existing distribution of the ethnical elements in the British Islands of our own day. IV.— THE FINAL MIXTUKE. AFTER the English settlement in south-eastern Britain two other ethnical elements of less importance were added at different times to the population of our islands. Both were originally Scandinavian (and therefore Aryan) by descent, but more or less mixed with other strains from elsewhere. The first was that of the heathen Scandinavians from the North. In the eighth and ninth centuries, large bodies of Danes and Northmen began to settle all round the coasts of Britain. In Ireland they occupied all the large river mouths and havens, such as Dublin, "Wexford, Water, ford, and Cork, where they formed a set of Scandi- navian colonies which gradually coalesced with the native Celt-Euskarian population. In Scotland they seized upon Caithness, Sutherland, and Eoss, on the mainland, together with Orkney, Shetland, and the whole of the Western Isles, from Lewis to Arran. In 232 NATURE STUDIES. Wales they founded a few minor settlements around the south-west coast, near Milford Haven. Finally, jn England itself, they occupied all Northumbria (including our Yorkshire), all Lincolnshire, Norfolk and Suffolk, and the greater part of the midlands. Important Danish " hosts " had their centres at Derby, Leicester, Nottingham, Huntingdon, North- ampton, and Bedford. Norwegians also settled in the Lake District, till then peopled exclusively by the Strathclyde Welsh. How large an element in the population these Scandinavian invaders formed it would, perhaps, be difficult to estimate; but they must certainly have made a great accession to the (number of light and fair-haired Aryan colonists. At the same time, since they came as mere pirates, they did not bring their women with them ; and they i therefore intermarried with the people of each district where they settled. Nor did they at all exterminate the earlier inhabitants. In Ireland their blood was thus almost lost in the prevalent Celt-Euskarian type ; *n the Lake district and the Scotch Highlands it has hardly had much more permanent influence ; but in Eastern England, where the Scandinavians intermixed with the purest Aryan stock left in Britain, they must have afforded a very considerable reinforcement to the light type, and their fair hair has certainly leffc its mark upon a large part of the population. The second Scandinavian admixture came later and more indirectly with the Normans from Normandy, under William the Conqueror. These Normans were OUR ANCESTORS. 233 originally Danes like those who colonised eastern England ; but they had intermarried with the native women of Neustria (northern France), where they settled ; and the Neustrians were, of course, Celtic Gauls, largely intermixed with Euskarian elements. Moreover, the Conquest brought over, not these half- breed Normans alone, but many pure Celt-Euskarian Gauls or Frenchmen from the neighbouring provinces as well, together with a considerable sprinkling of pure Celt-Euskarian Bretons from Brittany — a very dark stock, like the Black Celts of Ireland and Scotland. Accordingly, so far as numerical prepon- derance of the dark and light race goes, the Norman Conquest left things in Britain pretty much where they were before. Thus, then, to sum up the general result of this brief inquiry, we may say that the ethnical composition of modern Britain is somewhat after the following fashion. First, there is a substratum or oldest stage of dark, non- Aryan people, whom we call Euskarians for convenience, and who are the descendants of the very earliest aboriginal inhabitants in recent times, the neolithic folk. These Euskarians are now nowhere to be found in very great purity, for they have married in with the later Aryan invaders till both are at present well-nigh indistinguishable. But they are still found in a fairly unmixed form among the Black Celts of Ireland and Scotland, where one or two little com- munities yet remain almost unaltered in the wilds of Connaught or the highlands of the central Scotch 234 NATURE STUDIES. hills. They are also more sparsely recognisable in many parts of England itself, especially in the York- shire plain, in Lincolnshire, and along the Severn valley. And they are fairly frequent in wild Wales. All over the country, too, persons or families of this dark early type occur here and there sporadically. Indeed, it is probable that some relics of Euskarian blood survive everywhere in Britain, and that every one of us is more or less remotely descended on one side or the other from neolithic ancestors. Dark children of true Euskarian type are liable to be born from time to time in almost all families. It may be well to add also, in a science which is so personal to- most of us as ethnology, that there is absolutely no sufficient proof that any one type or race in Britain is mentally or morally superior to any other. We must not fall into the easy habit of supposing that an earlier race is necessarily either a better or a worse one : the facts do not go to prove either supposition. Secondly, there is a superstratum or later stage of light Aryan people, who have broken over the islands in three distinct waves — Celtic, English, and Scandi- navian— and have everywhere mixed more or less with one another, and with the old Euskarian race. Ireland is, perhaps, mainly peopled by Euskarians, intermixed,, in most parts, with Celts (but least so in Connemara and Kerry), while round its east coast there is much Scandinavian blood; and in Ulster there are many Scots, who are really Strathclyde Celt-Euskarians from the western lowlands. So-called English settlers, many OUR ANCESTORS. 235 of them Welsh, or Lancastrian, and others Norman, are scattered throughout the Pale. But, as a whole, Ireland is probably more Euskarian and less Aryan than any other part of Britain. In Scotland, the north and the Isles are Celt-Euskarian, with a large Scandinavian admixture; the Central Highlands are Euskarian with a very small Celtic element intermixed ; the Eastern Lowlands are mainly English ; and the Western Lowlands are peopled by Strathclyde Welsh- men— that is to say, Celt-Euskarians, probably with a larger dash of Aryan Celtic and English blood than elsewhere. Wales is Euskarian at bottom, slightly Celticised, and with a little English and Norse blood. England itself is mainly English (or Low Dutch) in the south-east; English and Danish, with a little Celt-Euskarian admixture, in the Eastern Counties, the North, and the Midlands ; English and Celt- Euskarian in the West country, and the Severn Valley ; and Norse and Celt-Euskarian in Lancashire and the Lake District. Cornwall alone remains almost wholly Euskarian in type. All these statements, however, must be accepted merely in the rough, and they apply especially to the agricultural classes and the mass of the people. At the present day, the upper classes have intermarried all over the three kingdoms ; the mercantile classes have moved about till Mac's and O's are as common in London as in Perthshire and Mayo ; and even the artisans have poured into every great manufacturing town from all parts of the country. Ever since the beginning of the modern 236 NATURE STUDIES. industrial movement, there has been a steady south- ward and eastward return-wave of Celt-Euskarian emigrants towards the more organised regions. Irish- men have poured into London, Liverpool, Glasgow, -and South Wales ; Highlanders into Glasgow, Edin- burgh, and Paisley; Welshmen into London, Bir- mingham, Liverpool, and Manchester. At the present day, as Professor Huxley remarks, the dark typo seems once more to be numerically superseding the .light one. Almost all of us are English in language, but most of us are only very partially English in blood. To put the same matter another way, our oldest element is the dark one, now scattered up and down through the population, and only gathered very sparingly into a little nucleus here or there in Ireland and Scotland. This element was Celticised, but not exterminated, by the Aryan Celts, and became with them the Celt- Euskarian " Ancient Britons" of our history-books. Then the Celt-Euskarian was conquered by the Teutonic English, and Anglicised into the English of pre-Norman times. Next, these mixed English were conquered by Danes, whom they shortly absorbed. Dane and English were afterwards conquered by Normans, whom once more they absorbed. Dane and Irish in Ireland were next conquered and Anglicised by Norman-English, and the country further settled at various times by English and Scotch. Lastly, all these elements have coalesced with Welsh, Highland Scotch, and Scandinavians of the Isles, to form one OUR ANCESTORS. 237 heterogeneous British nation, so inextricably inter- mixed that its ethnology can now only be re-con- structed in the rough. But all through, each earlier element has everywhere persisted in the resulting* mixture, and it is probable that the numerical pro- portion of all the older elements, especially the Euskarian, is far greater than people generally at all imagine. TEE BEETLE'S VIEW OF LIFE. BY GRANT ALLEN. HEEE on a yellow crocus, buried deep in the beautiful golden cup, I have found a little bronze-mailed beetle, stealing the pollen as hard as he can eat it, and hugely enjoying his plentiful morning feast. I have picked him carefully out with a little bit of stick, and I have got him here now crawling about suspiciously upon my hand, and trying to find out what is the best way down from that unpleasantly warm and danger- ously mobile valley — the hollow of my palm. I often wish I could discover how the world looks to that small creature here ; and, perhaps, the question is not quite so unanswerable as it appears at first sight. When one remembers that brain and nervous system are on the whole a good index of mind, and that 238 NATURE STUDIES. feelings and ideas depend upon the arrangement of the various sense-organs and their connected central parts, it will be clear that, after all, we may make a fair guess at what is passing in this little beetle's head, especially since his notions about things generally must in all probability be a good deal simpler and more directly dependent upon his sensa- tions than our own. Now, what, in the first place, are the beetle's senses ? He can see, that we all know ; and his sight is on the whole a good deal like our own. His eye can discriminate form, and that accurately, for in all flying creatures this sense is necessarily highly deve- loped; it has been evolved and perfected side by side with their wings, or else they could never have learned to fly at all. They can doubtless distinguish colour, too; for we know positively from Sir John Lubbock's experiments that this is the case with bees, and there are good grounds for believing that the same thing is true of all flower-feeding insects as well, since all alike seem to be guided to the flowers by their brilliant hues. Sir John put drops of honey on slips of glass above bits of coloured paper ; and when he had once taught a bee to feed from one slip, say the blue, he found that it would return straight to that slip, even when the relative places of the colours had been transposed. Now, almost all flowers which contain honey have also bright petals; and Mr. Darwin has shown that both honey and petals have been developed by the flowers for the sake of THE BEETLES VIEW OF LIFE. 239 attracting insects, which carry their pollen from head to head, and so fertilise and impregnate the seeds. Moreover, the colours of the petals differ in different species, according to the kind of insects which they each wish to attract. Thus, bee-flowers are usually blue or red ; and Sir John Lubbock has proved that bees show a distinct preference for these colours, while beetle-flowers are often yellow, and small fly- flowers are generally white. Such facts, and others like them, show that the beetle has sensations of sight essentially identical with our own, and also that he has certain special tastes for certain special hues and blossoms. It is much the same with the other senses. The beetle certainly hears sounds ; and his hearing appears to be analagous to our own ; for the ~gh he himself is not musical, yet many other insects are; and these produce special notes and melodias to charm the ladies of their kind. He can also taste, and is fond of sweet things, like most other animals, for the flowers which seek to allure him lay by a drop of honey for his use ; and this liking for sugary juices is shared by almost all insects, from the flies which crowd around a barrel of treacle at a grocer's door, to the ants which suck the honey-dew from the little green aphides that they keep as we keep cows. Last of all, he can smell, for the flowers which depend on him for fertilisation are usually perfumed, and both beetles and other insects are often attracted by scent, as all collectors well know ; indeed, they frequently 240 NATURE STUDIES. catch rare insects by enclosing one of their mates in a box, when the quick-scented and eager lovers soon, sail up from leeward, evidently attracted by the dis- tinguishing odour borne upon the breeze. Nay, some butterflies have special scent-glands among the feathery scales on their wings, to make them more charming to their pretty spouses, just as so many of the higher animals have a peculiar musky perfume. I may mention that Mr. Darwin similarly sets down the brilliant colours and ornamental spots of butter- flies, as well as the curious horns and excrescences of many beetles, to the long selective action of their fair lady-loves, who always choose the handsomest and strongest among their numerous rival suitors. It is to this same cause that we probably owe the bright iridescent hues and bossy headpiece of the little creature who has now just escaped from my hand by clumsily transferring himself to yonder tall blade of rank meadow-grass. Thus, as far as his outward picture of the world goes, the beetle's ideas must really be very similar to our own. The universe of sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches through which he moves must present the same general effect as that which we ourselves experience in our intercourse with outer things. But when we come to consider the relations which the beetle establishes between these primordial sense-impressions, the little ideas and emotions which he elaborates out of them, we find signs that the difference is vast indeed. Though the material is the THE BEETLE'S VIEW OF LIFE. 241 same, the product is as unlike as the letters of the alphabet are to the " Iliad " or " Paradise Lost." The elements of human thought are there, but the organ- ising and co-ordinating power is wanting. If you were to cut open the beetle's head, you would find in it a small knot or lump of nervous matter, roughly answering to our own brains. To this lump the various sense-organs send up bundles of nerves ; and in it the impressions derived from the different senses are compared and arranged, so as to produce the common impulse upon which the beetle acts. But the size of this nervous knot is vastly smaller in proportion to the insect than the human brain is to the body of a man. Our brain consists of numberless cells, arranged and united in definite subordination to one another, and so disposed that every parfc of our nervous mechanism can be brought into relation with every other ; while in many cases we are not concerned in our mental operations with actual sense-impressions at all, or even with memories of such impressions combined into the shape of ideal objects, but with wholly abstract conceptions, elabo- rated out of them by the action of the brain itself in its higher parts. The beetle, however, can do nothing analogous to this. Its mental life is wholly made up of direct impressions and actions immediately depen- dent upon them. Memories it doubtless possesses in a slight degree, especially in the form of mere recognitions; but it is not probable that it can think of an object in its absence, or 'voluntarily K- 242 NATURE STUDIES. recall it; while it certainly cannot reflect as we can about abstract ideas, or even about things which do not concern its immediately present needs and actions. Indeed, the whole nervous system of the beetle is so loosely bound together — so little co-ordinated, as Mr. Herbert Spencer puts it — that it can hardly be said to possess any distinct voluntary capacity, or any strongly-marked personality at all. In the case of man and the other higher animals, almost the whole nervous system is Abound up with the brain, sending messages up to it, and receiving orders from it in return, so that a single great nervous centre governs all our movements, and ensures that uni- formity of action without which the complicated activities of human life would be impossible. The only nerves (worth mentioning) in the human body which are not thus under the control of the brain, are those of the heart and other internal organs; and over these parts, as everybody knows, we have not any voluntary power. But all our limbs and muscles are moved in accordance with impulses sent down from the brain, so that, for example, when I have made up my mind to send a telegram to a friend, my legs take me duly to the telegraph office, my hand writes the proper message, and my tongue undertakes the necessary arrangements with the clerk. But in the insect's body there is no such regular subordina- tion of all the parts composing the nervous system to a single central organ or head-office. The largest THE BEETLES VIEW OF LIFE. 243 knot of nerve-matter, it is true, is generally to be found in the neighbourhood of the sense-organs, and it receives direct nerve-bundles from the eyes, antennse, mouth, and other chief adjacent parts ; but the wings and legs are moved by separate knots of nerve-cells, connected by a sort of spinal cord with the head, but capable of acting quite independently on their own account. Thus, if we cut off a wasp's head and stick it on a needle in front of some sugar and water, the mouth will greedily begin to eat the sweet syrup, apparently unconscious of the fact that it has lost its stomach, and that the food is quietly dropping out of the gullet at the other end as fast as it is swallowed. So, too, if we decapitate that queer Mediterranean insect, the Praying Mantis, the headless body will still stand catching flies with its outstretched arms, and fumbling about for its mouth when it has caught one, evidently much surprised to find that its head is unaccountably missing. In fact, whatever may be the case with man, the insect, at least, is really a conscious automaton. It sees or smells food, and is at once impelled by its nervous constitution to eat it. It receives a sense-impression from the bright hue of a flower, and it is irresistibly attracted towards it, as the moth is to the candle. It has no power of deliberation, no ability even to move its own limbs in unaccustomed manners. Its whole life is governed for it by its fixed nervous constitution, and by the stimulations it receives from outside. And so, though the world probably appears much E 2 244 NATURE STUDIES. the same to the beetle as to us, the nature of its life is very different. It acts like a piece of clock-work mechanism, wound up to perform a certain number of fixed movements, and incapable of ever going beyond the narrow circle for which it is designed* WHAT IS A GEAPE? BY GRANT ALLEN. THEY make a beautiful picture, these big English hot-house black Hambros, with their purple bloom and waxlike texture, clustered thickly together in rich luxuriance on their slender and heavily- weigh ted branching fruit-stalks. Indeed, we have now culti- vated them to such a pitch of excellence, that their old wild ancestors would hardly recognise them to-day for members of the same original woodland family of Oriental climbers. Yet, after all, we have only been able to carry a little further, by careful selection and tillage, the peculiarities which Nature had long since produced in the primitive native stock. At best, man can only develop more fully what the plant itself has well begun. Our ornamental flowers are but the handsomest chosen wild blossoms ; our cereals and edible roots are but the starchiest wild seeds and tubers ; and our garden fruits are but the pick of the WHAT IS A GEAPE? 245 hips and haws and wayside berries, improved and altered by ages of cultivation. The grape-vine, they say, comes to us originally from the shores of the Caspian. Even in its native condition it produces little sweetish acid grapes, hang- ing in purple clusters among its green festoons. The question is, then, of what use to the plant itself are these juicy fruits ? For we now know that whatever use man may make of this, that, or the other organ in any particular plant or animal is, so to speak, an accidental after-thought ; the organ always subserves besides some useful purpose in the economy of the plant or animal itself to which it belongs. Now, of course, the main use of all fruits is to produce or con- tain the seeds. They are merely seed-vessels, and, in most cases, they are dry and brown when ripe, like the pea-pod, the poppy-head, or the capsule of the mignonette. The problem we have to answer in the case of the grape is therefore this : Why should it be pulpy and prettily coloured, while these other fruits — and, indeed, the vast majority of all fruits — are mere dry and unattractive organs ? The analogy of red and white and yellow flowers affords us a good hint towards the solution of this problem. We know that flowers have acquired their bright hues, their honey, and their perfume, for the sake of attracting the insects which fertilise them by carrying pollen from head to head. Is there any way in which fruits can similarly benefit by alluring the eyes of any animal race? At first sight this would 246 NATUEE STUDIES. seem impossible ; but a little consideration will show us a way out of the difficulty. Most plants, it is true, can only lose by allowing their seeds to be perceived and eaten by animals. In such cases the fruit, be it pod or capsule, is usually inconspicuous in colour, and drops its tiny little seeds quietly out upon the ground beneath. Those plants which best succeed in divert- ing the attention of seed-eating birds or mammals from their fruits, outlive, in the long run, their less adapted neighbours ; and so the survival of the fittest has brought it about that ninety-nine kinds out of a hundred in our own day have unnoticeable little green or brown seed vessels, such- as those of the chickweed, the pimpernel, and the clover tribe, which nobody but a botanist ever observes at all. Suppose, however, that any plant happens to have its seeds covered with a moderately hard and indigestible outer coat, would it not then be rather benefited than otherwise by having these seeds enclosed in a soft and juicy bed of edible pulp ? For in that case birds and other animals might eat the seeds, fruit and all, for the sake of the pulpy covering ; and as the hard little shell would protect the young embryo within, this vital part would not be digested, but would pass uninjured through the creature's body. By such an arrangement the plant would not only get its seeds dispersed — in- itself a most important matter — but would also have the young seedling well manured and started in life under unusually favourable auspices. If such a tendency were ever to be set up even in the slightest degree by a WHAT IS A GRAPE? 247 mere sport or chance variation, we may be sure the variety in which it appeared would be so favoured by circumstances, that it would soon become a marked and distinct species. As a matter of fact, it is pretty certain that such has been the origin of all edible pulpy fruits. Take, for example, these grapes here. If you cut one of them open, you will find inside a number of hard little seeds. Slice one of these again with a sharp penknife, and you will see that it consists of a tiny embryo plant in the centre, surrounded by a very solid bony shell. Each seed is in fact a miniature nut ; and the kernel, so to speak, consists of the tiny plantlet within, together with the albumen on which it feeds when it first begins to germinate. Now, if any bird were to swallow and digest this vital part of the seed, the plant would, of course, be an obvious loser. But the hard shell prevents such a catastrophe from hap- pening ; and, therefore, the plant is benefited by the soft, eatable pulp which surrounds these little mimic nuts. Observe, too, that the fruity part of the grape is sweet; it contains grape sugar. Now sugar is always laid up in those parts of plants which specially seek to attract the animal world. In flowers, the nectar allures the fertilising bees and butterflies ; in fruits and berries, the sweet juices allure the birds which disperse the seeds ; nay, even the pitcher-plants secrete honey to wile flies into their insect-eating •cups ; and certain acacias store it up in hollow thorns to attract the epicurean ants, which, in turn, protect 248 NATURE STUDIES. the tree by driving away their leaf-eating relations. In almost every case, one may say that where sugar is found in any organ of a plant, it is placed there for the sake of engaging the attention of some animal ally; while, conversely, all flower-feeding and fruit- eating creatures always manifest a marked taste for sweet substances, dependent upon their long habitua- tion to sugary food. Not only, however, are the grapes sweet, but they are also brightly coloured. Naturally, among succu- lent fruits bidding for the attention of birds, those would best succeed which were most visible at some little distance. Accordingly, just as • the insect- fertilised flowers have developed brilliant pigments in their petals, so the fruits which depend upon birds for the dispersion of their seeds have acquired prettily- coloured coverings. We all know how noticeable are the hips and haws, the holly-berries and rowan- berries, even among our northern woodlands ; while the oranges, mangoes, and pomegranates of the tropics appeal ev-en more vividly to the sharp eyes of monkeys, parrots, and toucans. At the same time, it is noteworthy that the tastes of birds with regard to colour seem to differ somewhat from those of insects ; for, as Mr. Wallace points out, white, which is a common colour for flowers, is rare among fruits; while purple and bluish-black, which are seldom met with among flowers, may almost be considered as the ordinary colours of most wild fruits. WHAT IS A GEAPE? 249 Looking1 closely into my cluster of grapes, again, I see that it still contains two or three unripe and stunted specimens. These, of course, are pale-green, like the leaves, and when I taste one of them I find it unpleasantly harsh and acid to the palate. This reminds me that grapes, like other fruits, are not at all stages of their existence sweet and brightly coloured. While the seeds are still immature, they would only lose by being eaten, because they are not yet fit for germination. In this stage, therefore, the skin is filled with green colouring matter, and the- cluster is quite inconspicuous among the foliage which surrounds it. It does not want to attract attention in its present stage. Furthermore, the pulp at this period is filled with tartaric acid and other sour juices, to repel any too-inquiring or too-impatient visitor. But as the seeds mature, the fruit ripens, that is to say, a chemical change goes on in the pulpy portion, which results in the formation of grape-sugar. At the same time other chemical changes taking place in the skin result in the production of the purple bloom, which advertises to the birds the presence of the sweet juice within. The whole process obviously aims at concealing the fruit and rendering it unpalatable while the seeds are immature, and at making it con- spicuous as well as pleasant the moment the seeds are ripe for dispersion. Hence we are justified in con- cluding that the development of the grape is due to the long selective action of fruit-eating birds. Origin- ally, no doubt, the primitive ancestral vine produced NATURE STUDIES. smaller and harder seed-vessels, which were probably green when young, and brown when ready to fall upon the ground. But some of them happened to show a tendency towards producing larger and juicier fruits, and these were constantly favoured by the unconscious friendliness of the neighbouring birds. The colour and the sweetness would soon follow, as they have followed a thousand times over in the develop- ment of each separate edible fruit. A grape, in short, viewed from the standpoint of the vine itself, is merely a cunning device for ensuring the assistance of birds or mammals in dispersing the little, nut-like seeds of which man takes, as a rule, such scanty notice. GERMS OF DISEASE AND DEATH. BY DR. ANDREW WILSON, F.R.S.E. MOST readers have heard of the " Germ Theory," and there are few persons who do not know what the hypothesis of that name means and implies. Popularly regarded, this theory holds that a very large proportion of the diseases that affect and afflict man and his neigh- bour animals, owe their origin to minute forms of life — whether animal or vegetable, or both, is still, in most cases, a matter of doubt. To select a single illustration of the application of this theory, we may GEEMS OF DISEASE AND DEATH. 251 take the case of small-pox, and its analogous condition the fever produced by vaccination. When an infant is vaccinated, the physician introduces into its system, through an abrasion of its skin, a minute quantity of vaccine lymph, which, as everybody knows, is obtained either from the vaccination pustule of an already vaccinated child, or direct from the calf. In either case, there are introduced into the infant body, certain minute germs — suspended in and living naturally amongst the vaccine lymph — and in due course these germs multiply and increase within the frame, thereby producing the characteristic fever, and the equally characteristic pustule at the seat of the operation. So, also, with small-pox, which vaccination imitates in a mild way, and of which, moreover, it is a preventive. Here the germs of small-pox, obtained directly or indirectly from an already infected person, attack the body. Gaining admittance thereto, they propagate themselves within the tissues and through the medium of the blood. Sooner or later all the characteristic symptoms of the disease are manifested, and having run its course, it dies away as mysteriously, to all appearance, as it came. Now, there is something strikingly analogous in all this to the growth of an animal or plant. There is a period of " incubation " in the fever, just as in the production of the living being there is a period of development. There is a growth of the fever, as the animal or plant grows towards its maturity ; and there is a decline of the disease, as the living form passes to its old age and 252 NATURE STUDIES. death. So far, then, the parallel between ordinary life and the birth, growth, and decline of a disease, is very close and clear. But the analogies are not yet exhausted. Each fever produces its like, as do animals and plants. Each disease reproduces its kind, as Tyndall has somewhere observed,1 as rigorously as dog and cat reproduce their like. The phenomena, or, as a doctor would call them, the ' ' symptoms/' of each disease are* as a rule, highly distinctive. The symptoms of scarla- tina are not those of small-pox ; measles is different from the other two ; whilst typhus fever is again thoroughly different from all three. Analogy may, as . Darwin says, be a deceitful guide ; but when the facts are so closely allied, as are the facts of epidemic diseases to those of animal and plant development, the use of analogy cannot be doubted in rendering the relationship clearer. We are now in a position to understand more clearly the utility and strength of the germ theory in certain of those aspects which bear most materially on science at large. It would only serve to strengthen the idea that our epidemic diseases are simply the offspring of lower life, if we reflect in passing that there are known to science a very considerable number of lower plants which produce in man's skin effects and diseases as characteristic as those which a fever induces in his system at large. Thus, the disease known as " ring- 1 Quoting a remark by Miss Nightingale. — ED. GERMS OF DISEASE AND DEATH. 253 worm " is caused by tlie growth in the human skin of a parasitic fungus, and a whole series of skin affections is known wherein lower plants play the part of direct causes. Thus, if it is a matter of certainty that a par- ticular skin-disease is caused by lower-plant growth, so no less is it by analogy likely that all other contagious and epidemic diseases are in reality the products of life. So much for the general idea that permeates the "germ theory " of disease. Within the past few months some highly important additions have been made to our knowledge of the part played by lower organisms in the production of disease. M. Pasteur, whose researches into the development of lower organisms have placed him in the foremost rank of scientific workers, has detailed at length the results of his investigations into the causes which produce the curious disease known as charbon, anthrax, and splenic fever. This disease, whilst but rarely attacking man, is fatal to horses, cattle, and sheep. France suffers greatly from this " plague of boils/' and it is also known in various other countries as a literal scourge. Pasteur, it should be mentioned, had already acquired much valuable experience in the investigation into the cause of the pebrine, or silkworm disease, which in 1863 had devastated the silk industry of France. Pasteur showed that pebrine was caused by the growth and multiplication, within the bodies of the insects, of minute "corpuscles," which were practically lower forms of life. Even the eggs from which the worms were hatched, were shown to be liable to infection from 254 NATURE STUDIES. pebrine ; the eggs, in such, a case, inheriting the disease from the parent moth which laid them. As the result of a long and laborious series of experiments, Pasteur showed that the pebrine would spread like an infectious disease "by the contact of whole with diseased worms. He showed that, just as man isolates his fever patients, so the French silk-grower had to isolate and separate his diseased worms. But the knowledge which led to this effectual result was knowledge that had been won by an uphill fight, and that had been gained by the object-glass of the microscope, and by the whole-souled devotion of many months' industry. Turning now to the Charbon or Splenic Fever, we witness another veritable triumph of Pasteur's in- dustry and research. In 1850, certain observers noted the interesting fact that minute, rod-like bodies, which appeared to be lower forms of plant life, existed in the blood of animals affected with this disease. The ' ' rods/5 it was observed, originated from particles which might, with perfect accuracy, be called "Germs." And as we watch the "rods" in turn, we see that, sooner or later, microscopic specks appear in their substance ; these grow to form regular bead-like rows within the ' ' rods " ; and when finally the " rods " themselves break up and fall to pieces, these beads are liberated as the " germs," which in time will grow into new rods. Thus countless myriads of rods and germs grow and are reproduced within the body of the animal suffering from splenic fever. The fever, in a word, is the result of the growth and development within the living soil, of GERMS OF DISEASE AND DEATH. 255 these rod-like plants. But exact demonstration of the truth of the latter statement can be had. If we grow and cultivate in a proper fluid — such as the aqueous humour of the eye of an ox — the " rods," we may inoculate with our "rods" the body of a healthy animal. We may sow in that animal's body the germs of splenic fever. Thus a drop of a solution containing the ' c rods " sown within the body of a guinea-pig, produces splenic fever in that animal. And more wonderful still, it has been shown that the dried blood taken from an animal affected with this fever will reproduce the fever, even after an interval of four years, if the dried particles of blood with their "rods" be introduced into the body of a healthy animal. Pasteur, armed with knowledge of the kind just detailed, set himself to ascertain the ' ' reason why " splenic fever should suddenly appear in districts which knew it not, and wherein only healthy animals lived. Obviously, if the germ theory were true, such sudden and apparently isolated outbreaks must be capable of being explained on this hypothesis. The idea of the " spontaneous," or de novo, or ex nihilo origin of the disease would, if supported by facts, prove fatal to the (C germ theory." Here, then, was a typical case for scientific investigation. Let us see how the genius of Pasteur overcame the difficulties of the situation. The localities in which splenic fever seemed to burst out suddenly and without warning were, as Pasteur learned, former seats of the disease. But the interval between the visitation was to be measured by years. How, then, could the new outbreak be 256 NATURE STUDIES. accounted for ? It seemed, in truth, as if the one outbreak had little or nothing to do with the other. The infected animals which had died, or had been killed, whilst suffering from the fever, were duly buried, and that very deeply, in the soil. Such a method of interment would seem to obviate all risk of infection. But the possibilities of nature are illimit- able, and no man knew this better than Pasteur. If the poison had been buried in the soil, why should it not be there still ? And, further, why should it not be conveyed upwards to infect the fresh flocks that fed on the graves of their predecessors ? With a gift of scientific divination, Pasteur sought in the earth- worm, the type of the " middle-man " betwixt the living and the dead. He now examines the bodies of the worms which live in the soil wherein the bodies of the animals infested with splenic fever, years before, were entombed. By experimental means, he solves his problem. He makes a preparation of the contents of the digestive system of the worms. This he .administers in the food of healthy animals, entirely removed from the pastures. And once again a scientific principle dawns in view. The rabbits and guinea-pigs which devoured the matter obtained from the worms at once developed splenic fever, whilst in their blood the rods were seen developing in full force. Once again Pasteur had sown the fever, and had argued thus from the result, backwards to the cause. It has also been proved, that even grain may convey the subtle "rods" to healthy animals, and GEEMS OF DISEASE AND DEATH. may in this way engender splenic fever. Following close upon the heels of the discovery of the germ- origin of this fatal malady, comes the gratifying announcement that, as small-pox is modified by vaccination, so splenic fever may be modified by an analogous process. Pasteur has proved that we can inoculate sheep and cattle with a mild form of fever which protects the animal from a recurrence of the disease ; and this protective influence, as we write, is being practically utilised by the breeders of France. Such is a brief recital of a new step towards a perfect knowledge of the nature of the diseases which decimate, not merely animal life, but human existence as well. It may not be inappropriate if, by way of close, we remind our readers of two very noteworthy points in connexion with this all-important topic, bearing, as it does, in the most intimate manner upon the physical welfare of man. The first of the points to which we refer concerns the apparently trivial origin of an all-important subject. It was in the city of Florence, some two hundred or more years ago, that a certain physician, Francesco Eedi by name, demonstrated to the Floren- tine wiseacres that the maggots in meat do not arise from the dead meat by "spontaneous generation/' but were produced from the eggs of flesh-flies. This result he achieved by covering over the meat with gauze, so that whilst the meat-decay proceeded, there was likewise a convincing absence of maggots. Childishly simple as was Kedi's experiment, it laid s 358 NATURE STUDIES. the basis and method of all succeeding research ; for from his day to ours the progress of the "germ theory/' or of that doctrine which holds that all life, however mysteriously generated, must spring from pre-existing life, has been uniform and triumphant. But the second point to which attention is worthy of being directed, exists in the statement that the practical and actual benefits which have flowed to human health, and which are likely to flow in the future as well — the saving of life by the prevention and extermination of disease — arise from a simple study in natural history. So-called " practical" minds are often given to loudly express their dis- approval of any science which deals with what, to them, seem mere abstractions. Doubtless, to such minds the study of the development of the " rods " of splenic fever under a watch-glass, must seem a piece of scientific dilettantism; just as information respect- ing the solar system may seem despicable enough, because its results cannot be measured by a profitable currency, or, in plain language, because it " doesn't seem to pay." The best answer to such foolishness, is found in a recital of the results to human and animal life to which natural history study seems likely to lead. Just as two hundred years ago, in Florence, Kedi began the good work by a simple study in zoology, so to-day we are reaping the reward of the earnest work of the botanists and zoologists who toil and labour to spread abroad their saving knowledge. NATURE STUDIES. 259 A WONDERFUL DISCOVERY. BY R. A. PROCTOR. NOT long since a story was started in an Australian paper to the effect that a means had been found by which animals could be frozen into insensibility, and restored to life after months or even years had passed. If the narrative had any foundation in scientific possi- bilities, the discovery would involve results far more remarkable than those affecting the exportation of cattle. Indeed, to consider the matter only from an agricultural point of view, our farmers at home would gain much more than the Australian squatters. The great difficulty of profitably feeding cattle during the winter months would be disposed of very simply and effectively. Nothing more would be needed than to congeal the larger part of the live stock late in the autumn and to restore them to life in spring. But the application of the process of ft congelation without killing" to human beings would be altogether the most important result of the wonderful discovery — if only the wonderful discovery had really been made or were in any way possible. Unfortunately, it would seem that our cousins in Australia are beginning now to do what the Americans were famous, or rather were notorious, for doing a quarter of a century since or more. They invented lately for our benefit the tele- gastograph, an instrument by which a dinner, with s 2 26o NATURE STUDIES. appropriate wines, could be communicated by the- electric wire, at least so far as the taste of the food was concerned. And now they provide for us a story of a still more stupendous kind. We believe, how- ever, that they can claim credit in this case only for preserving and exporting the concoction of American, artists, the wonderful discovery having been originally published in New York, though even then purporting to be an Australian invention. It is singular how these ingenious narratives resemble' each other in style and turns of expression, even when they unquestionably come from different sources. The writer of the clever paper called " The Lunar Hoax '* must long since have joined the majority, since that hoax appeared 44 years ago, and he was not a young man then. But the account of the Australian dis- covery might have been written by the same hand, so closely does it resemble ( ' The Lunar Hoax " in manner- of treatment. . To begin with, both stories contain just that germ of scientific truth which is necessary to give an air of probability to such inventions. In the " Lunar Hoax " the optical relations on which the possibility of detecting living creatures in the moon is made to turn, are so dealt with that unscientific persons might readily have been deceived, and, in fact, many were deceived. It was said that even Arago was entrapped and circulated all over Paris the wonders related in the pamphlet. But there were errors in the optical discussion of the subject which would have saved a junior optime at Cambridge from being A WONDERFUL DISCOVERY. 26l -deceived, to say nothing of one so well acquainted with optical laws as Arago. Still, the idea of first illumi- nating the optical image (the so-called ' ' real image " as distinguished from the virtual image of the Galilean ^elescope) by the transfusion of light, and then magni- fying the image so illuminated, was ingeniously devised to deceive the inexperienced. " Why/' says Sir John Herschel, in conversation with Sir David Brewster, ^"why cannot the illuminating microscope — say, the oxyhydrogen — be applied to render distinct, and, if necessary, even to magnify, the focal object ? " The idea is enthusiastically received by Brewster. In an ecstasy of conviction he sprang from his seat, ex- claiming, " Thou art the man ! " And starting from this utterly unscientific but apparently quite plausible conception, all the rest of the story follows naturally •enough. So, in the Australian " discovery," the idea underlying the whole story is that the hibernation of animals can be artificially imitated and extended, so that, as certain animals lie in a state of torpor and insensibility throughout the winter month's, all animals may be caused to lie in such a state for an indefinite length of time if only a suitable degree of cold is maintained, and some special contrivance (in this con- sists the wonderful discovery) adopted to prevent insensibility passing into death. Precisely as the real wonders of telescopic discovery are so great that -scarcely anything will be believed to be impossible by those unacquainted with the circumstances limiting telescopic power, so the hibernation of warm-blooded 262 NATURE STUDIES. animals is in itself so wonderful that the inexperienced might well believe in any marvels resulting from an extension of the hibernating process. It has been well said that if hibernation had only been recognised among cold-blooded animals, its possibility in the case of mammals would have appeared inconceivable. Possibly in that case the first recognition of the com- plete hibernation of the bat and hedgehog would have been received with as little respect as the wonderful Australian discovery, though one case is, we know, not only possible, but actually existent, whereas the other is not consistent with scientific possibilities. For no one who understands what hibernation really is will for a moment confound it with the form of insensibility imagined by the inventor of this hoax. The bat and the hedgehog resign themselves to torpor when the insects disappear on which they live while- their active life continues. The breathing becomes slower and slower, and at last ceases altogether. The heart beats more and more slowly, more and more feebly, but it never ceases altogether to pulsate. If it did, life would pass away. The chemical changes on which animal heat depends cease with the cessation of respiration. But life is still preserved, though only passive or latent life, because the heart's fibre, excited to contract by the carbonised blood, continues slowly to propel the blood through the torpid frame. Thi& slow circulation of venous blood continues during the whole period of hibernation. It is the only vital act which can be recognised, and the marvel is great that A WONDERFUL DISCOVERY. 263 in any mammal this process should suffice to maintain life. It would seem that the material conveyed by the absorbents into the circulating fluid suffices to counter- balance the process of waste occasioned by the slow circulation ; but of course this does not explain how vitality remains under conditions which, if we judged from other warm-blooded animals, we should consider altogether inconsistent with life. For, so far as mere waste is concerned, the imagined Australian process is as effectual as hibernation. In that process of course the circulation would be as completely checked as the respiration; thus there would be no waste, and the absorbents (which would also b.e absolutely dormant) would not have to do even that slight amount of work which they accomplish during hibernation. Science can only say that cases of hibernation among warm- blooded animals show that the vital forces may be reduced much lower without destroying life than, but for such cases, we should have deemed conceivable. The question whether the process which takes place in the hibernation of certain animals can occur with other animals, including man himself, is one of con- siderable real interest in itself, and derives a factitious interest from the strange thoughts suggested by the imagined application of the " wonderful discovery " to human beings. It has been supposed by some that the phenomena observed during trance indicate the survival in man of a power, or rather a quality, resem- bling that possessed by the hibernating animals. It is said that in some cases of trance the vital powers have 264 NATUEE STUDIES. been so completely suspended that even experienced medical men have sanctioned the arrangements made for the funeral of the entranced person as of one sup- posed to be dead. Crichton describes such a case, where nothing saved the patient from premature burial but the appearance at the last moment of beads of perspiration on the patient's forehead. The young lady who underwent this terrible experience — for she was conscious of all that went on — had been severa* days regarded as dead. "She heard her friends lamenting her death. She felt them put on the dead- clothes and lay her in the coffin, which produced an indescribable mental anxiety. She tried to cry, but her mind was without power, and could not act on the body. . . . The internal anguish of her mind was, however, at its utmost height when the funeral hymns began to be sung, and when the lid of the coffin was about to be nailed on. The thought that she was to be buried alive was the first one which gave activity to her mind and caused it to operate on her corporeal frame. Just as the people were about to nail on the lid, a kind of perspiration was observed to appear on the surface of the body. It grew greater every moment, and at last a kind of convulsive motion was observed in the hands and feet of the corpse. A few minutes after, during which fresh signs of returning life appeared, she at once opened her eyes and uttered a most pitiable shriek." In most cases trance is pro- duced independently of any effort of the will. But some persons seem to have possessed the power of A WONDERFUL DISCOVERY. 265 producing all the phenomena of trance — nay, one may say all those observed among hibernating animals — at •will. Thua there is the well-known case of Colonel Townsend, who ' ' possessed the remarkable faculty of throwing himself into a trance at pleasure. The heart ceased, apparently, to throb at his bidding, respiration seemed at an end, his whole frame assumed the icy chill and rigidity of death, while his face became colour- less and shrunk, and his eyes fixed, glazed, and ghastly ; even his mind ceased to manifest itself, for during the trance it was as utterly devoid of conscious- ness as his body of animation. In this case he would remain for hours, when these singular phenomena wore away and ho returned to his usual condition." The strange stories told of the Fakirs and their power of suspending active vitality for much longer periods has been attested by English officers and medical men. We are told that the less-advanced Yogi can only enter the state of abstraction called reverie ; but the higher orders can simulate absolute inanition, the heart apparently ceasing to beat, the lungs to act, and the nerves to convey impressions to the brain, even though the body be subjected to processes which would cause extreme torture under ordinary conditions. (f When in this state/' says Dr. Carpenter, " the Yog, are supposed to be completely possessed by Brahmai ' the supreme soul/ and to be incapable of sin, in thought, word, or deed ; " indeed, it would be difficult to imagine how a man in a state of absolute inanition could be capable of sin. Dr. Carpenter ascribes this 266 NATURE STUDIES. singular power to the influence of the will forcibly concentrating the attention upon one subject. Few however would be likely to believe that even if the power of producing inanition at will for long periods of time became commoner than it is, the duration of life could in this way be prolonged. These spells of insensibility would be far more apt, we should imagine, to shorten life than to be simply abstracted from the total duration of life, so as to increase the actual interval separating the day of death from that of birth. It is true we are told that Old Parr, in the later years of his unduly prolonged life, passed nearly the whole of the 24 hours in semi-torpid sleep, during which, doubtless, his natural powers wasted far more slowly than they would have done had he kept awake. But sleep is one thing, artificially-produced insensibility another. If however the wonderful discovery were real instead of imaginary ; if men could at their own will be reduced to a state of absolute lifelessness for months and years together, the time thus passed being " so many unvalued and profitless years added to a lifetime," what strange results might follow ! A man might extend the threescore years and ten over as many centuries, being brought to life for a week or two at a time after intervals of two or three years passed in frozen lifelessness. One who found himself, or supposed himself, in advance of his age, might be congealed until the age had overtaken or passed beyond him. A father who had been shelved for a while in the family ice-vault might be restored to children BRAIN TROUBLES. 267 older than himself. Or again, a first-born who had displeased his father might be frozen until all his brothers had got the start of him, and re-appear among men as a younger brother. But indeed there is no end of such fancies. We may safely leave their further discussion until Signer Eotura has returned from his journey to South America " for a large supply of the two necessaries for the safe-conduct of his process, both of which substances at present remain a secret." BRAIN TROUBLES. BY E. A. PROCTOR. IN these days, when the energies of the mind have become more important than those of the body, and when even the health of the body is chiefly of value because of its direct association with the health of the mind, it is well that all who have much brain-work to do should know and understand the symptoms indi- cating derangement or overwork of mental powers. Of course, in all cases where, through whatever cause, any specific mental malady is in question, the assist- ance of physicians who have given special attention to cerebral diseases must be obtained. But for- tunately with most, even of those who work the brain hardest, no more real occasion arises (whatever some 268 NATURE STUDIES. doctors would assure us) for medical advice respecting mind troubles, than commonly arises in the case of •corporal troubles among men who pass their days in hard but healthy bodily toils. The saying that every man is either a fool or a physician at forty (thirty would, perhaps, be nearer the mark) may be applied -at least as well to the case of the mind as to that of the body. It is as easy for one who is not the fool of the proverb to understand the signs which indicate mind-mischief, and to minister to the mind when out of sorts (not actually diseased), as it is for him to note the signs of bodily ill-health, and apply the remedies which experience has shown him to be appropriate. And here we would note generally, what ifc is one object of this article to indicate spe- cifically, that the analogy may be carried somewhat further. There are few greater mistakes, so far as the body is concerned, than to imagine every little ailment to be a sign of actual disease, and to have recourse for such slight troubles either to medical advice, or (which may prove more mischievous still) to active medicines or other strong remedies. The physician of the proverb, that is, the man who, not being a fool, has learned to understand his own con- stitution under ordinary conditions, may be watchful, if he so pleases, of even the slightest indications of ill-health, general or local, so long as such watch- fulness does not degenerate into hypochondria. But most of these indications should suggest to him only such changes of diet, exercise, hours of resting, and BRAIN TROUBLES. 269- so forth, as his experience has found to be suitable, and should in the greater number of cases suggest negative rather than positive remedies even of this kind. Many signs of illness, indeed, which obtrude themselves on the attention even of those who watch themselves least in such matters, may far better be dealt with by the patient himself than by the physician. For instance, I have learned to regard severe headaches of a certain type simply as afford- ing evidence that certain articles of food (milk, butter, cheese, and the like) must either be given up altogether for several days, or taken in much- reduced quantity. "When this course is followed, I am freed from all such attacks, until after the lapse, perhaps, of two or three months a headache of this particular kind shows me that I have taken such articles of food in greater quantity than is desirable for one of my constitution. A doctor might prescribe with advantage for the cure of the attack itself, and there can be no reason why a person troubled by some severe attack of headache, muscular rheumatism, or the like, should not obtain from a doctor some- active medicine by which to diminish the pain from which he suffers; but it is a far more important matter to ascertain the regimen by which such attacks may be prevented from occurring, and this is a matter which a man (not being the ' ' fool " of the proverb) should manage for himself. Now what is true of bodily troubles is true of mental mischief, short of actual disease, though doctors who have 270 NATUEE STUDIES. learned, rather late, to leave men a good deal to themselves, so far as the former are concerned, are by no means ready to admit that mental troubles can also for the most part be remedied without calling in the physician. Writers like Forbes Winslow, and others, who have dealt with obscure diseases of the mind, have done service in calling attention to certain signs of cerebral mischief which laymen might be apt to overlook ; but they insist rather too strongly on these as indicative of actual disease, whereas it is within the experience of thousands that such signs, in the majority of cases, are no more to be regarded as necessarily indicating disease than a passing feel- ing of nausea necessarily indicates an approaching fever, or than a pain in the bowels necessarily indi- cates an approaching attack of Asiatic cholera. It should also be noted, that much mischief may be caused by suggesting that tricks and failings of the mind, which are quite common, are signs of serious cerebral mischief. Not long after the first edition of Forbes Winslow's treatise on fc Obscure Diseases of the Mind" appeared, a friend of mine, who had begun to read the book only because of his interest in matters scientific, found that it possessed for him a strong fascination, because nearly all the phenomena mentioned by Winsjow as indicative of approaching insanity were such as he had frequently noticed in his own case. Thereafter regarding these symptoms in the light in which they were thus presented, this unfortunate student of BEAIN TROUBLES. 2/1 cerebral science found himself presently possessed by a strange terror lest the state which Winslow seemed to indicate as a necessary sequel of these familiar signs should be close at hand in his own case. The evil progressed until his mind was really endangered by these mistaken fears ; but fortunately for him (if madness is rightly regarded as the greatest of all evils), a series of misfortunes befell him which for a time altogether withdrew his attention from the mental phenomena which had so excited his fears. For two or three years he had to contend against great pecuniary difficulties, and to endure a series of domestic calamities of no ordinary order. Com- pelled to withdraw his attention from his own mind, he forgot that, according to the teachings of mental physiologists, he had been fairly on the way towards either mania or idiocy. Four or five years later, chancing to take down Forbes Winslow's book from his library shelves, he read with amusement the passages which had formerly excited his fears. He knew that the mental symptoms graphically described by Winslow still presented themselves from time to time — when, for instance, he was tired or unwell bodily — but he had learned in a very practical way that they are not quite so ominous as the mind- doctors assert. It is indeed possible (perhaps probable, or even certain) that no cases of acute mania may be noticed which have not been preceded by such symptoms ; but assuredly these symptoms are not in every case — probably not in one case out 2/2 NATURE STUDIES. of hundreds of thousands — the signs of actual mental disease, nor in one case out of millions followed either by acute mania or by apopletic seizure, as in the exceptional cases dealt with by Dr. Forbes Winslow, We propose hereafter briefly to consider soine of the signs which show that the mind is temporarily out of order, requiring rest, relaxation, or change of employment. We may in some cases have to enforce the lesson we wish to inculcate by citing cases in which such symptoms have been followed by serious mental disturbance ; but we wish at the outset to persuade our readers that, in far the greater number of cases, these signs suggest only the necessity for ordinary precautions, not for medical advice or active remedial measures. I.— IMPAIRED MEMORY. The first mind trouble we propose to consider is the apparent temporary impairment of the memory. The gradual progressive decay of the power of memory with advancing years is, of course, a change which all may expect who attain great length of years; though, as Cicero long since pointed out, and as has been repeatedly exemplified by modern instances, the change is to some degree under control, and those matters in which an aged person takes special interest may be well remembered, when others about which he cares little are easily forgotten. " I never heard," says Cicero, " of any old man that has forgotten BRAIN TROUBLES. 273 where lie had hid his treasure ; things which they regard, old men remember — the securities they have out, and who are indebted to them, as well as to whom they are indebted." And so forth. The points to be noticed here are, first, that memory is seen to be in large degree a question of attention as well as of re- tention ; and, secondly, that decay of memory implies a change in the mind analogous to that which makes the old incapable of great bodily efforts. So that when the memory of a person who is not old becomes impaired, we may infer that unless there is actual disease, the symptom indicates overwork of the mind, precisely as bodily weariness indicates that the body has been overwrought. We may, perhaps, be led to inquire here whether a distinction should be drawn between loss of memory, as shown by a weakening of the power of committing to mind new matter (of whatever kind) which we may wish to remember, and the passing away from the mind of matter which had been already committed to it, and retained so long and so recently that its being forgotten can be ex- plained only as due to some marked and recent change in the state of the mind. Suppose, for instance, that after carefully noting a number of facts, which under ordinary conditions we should remember thencefor- ward for weeks, we find that they have left no sufficient impression on the mind ; here we obviously have evidence that the power of attention on which, in the first instance, memory depends, is for the time being enfeebled. Can we, however, infer that it is T 274 NA TURE STUDIES. weakened in the same way and in the same degree as we should judge it to be if we found that numbers, dates, names, or words, which we had had occasion to employ daily for years, were suddenly clean, for- gotten ? Making use, as we conveniently may (though we must not place too much stress on the method), of the analogy between bodily and mental relations, we may compare a change of the former kind to a diminution of the power of acquiring some new feat ; a change of the latter kind, to the sudden loss of a feat already acquired and long practised. It can hardly be doubted that an athlete who should find himself unable to perform some new gymnastic trick, which he had supposed well within his powers, would not be so much struck by the circumstance, as he would be if he should suddenly find himself unable to achieve a feat in which he had hitherto found no difficulty. Let us inquire, however, whether known cases of loss of memory of either kind afford any means of answer- ing the question which has thus arisen. Of course, those cases in which the trouble has been only tem- porary, though far more numerous than those in which loss of memory has been symptomatic of actual dis- ease, stand far less chance of being kept on record, so that we may have to consider cases of the latter kind to discover the relative importance of the two forms in which loss of memory may be noticed. The reader must not judge from cases thus cited that either class of symptoms is necessarily, or even pro- bably, indicative of serious brain mischief. BRAIN TROUBLES. 275 "We will begin, however, with a case in which the trouble was only temporary, and, moreover, its cause obviously indicated. Sir Henry Holland gives the following suggestive account of a transient loss of memory due to fatigue. It will be seen that the failure of memory belongs to the second class above referred to, that, viz., in which what had been long and well known is suddenly for- gotten. ' ' I descended," (he says, e ' on the same day, two very deep mines in the Harz Mountains, remaining some hours underground in each. While in the second mine, and exhausted both from fatigue and inanition, I felt the utter impossibility of talking longer with the German Inspector who accompanied me. Every Grerman word and phrase deserted my recollection, and it was not until I had taken food and wine, and been some time at rest, that I regained them/' This case would seem to show that transient loss of memory, even of this kind, need not be re garded as necessarily an alarming symptom. The following case points in the same direction even more decisively. "A gentleman/' says Dr. Win slow, " well known for his intense passion for field sports (living, as may be said, upon the saddle during the greater part of the year), frequently com- plained of transient attacks of loss of memory after a hard day's run with the hounds. His remedy for this affection was half a pint to a pint of port wine at a draught ! The effect of this heroic dose of vinous stimulant upon the depressed energy of the brain was T 2 276 NATURE STUDIES. evidenced by the memory immediately recovering its vigorous activity." It would, however, be unwise to infer that this sportsman, in thus prescribing for theso attacks, showed himself the " physician " of the pro- verb relating to fools and physicians. The remedy was a dangerous one. His was specially a case where prevention was better than cure. The transient attacks of loss of memory showed that the hard day's run with the hounds overtaxed his strength. Ho would have done wisely to have limited his exertions in the field (not giving up hunting, but restraining his zeal on those occasions when the day's run promised to be harder than usual). The effect of wine used regularly, not in pint * draughts, is in many cases undoubtedly good where the memory is apt to fail. We have an illustration of this in the following case, belonging to the first of tho two classes above considered. A gentleman whoso mental and physical powers had been severely taxed, lost all power of recollecting recent events. " Whilst engaged in active conversation, he was able, by a strong effort of will, to retain possession of the ideas suggested by others to his mind ; but if there were the slightest interruption, even to the extent of a minute, in the conversation, he lost all recollection of what he had been previously saying. This gentle- man had been living for some weeks below par, with the view of enabling him to perform an amount of mental work requiring for its execution the lengthened concentration of clear and vigorous intellect. He BEAIN TROUBLES. 277 had been in the habit of drinking a fair portion of wine, but had unwisely abandoned the use of stimu- lants, fancying that by so doing he would be better fitted for clear-headed mental occupation." Under Dr. Forbes Winslow's advice, the patient "lived generously, took iron tonics, quinine, and valerianate of zinc, and resumed his daily quantity of wine. This treatment eventually restored his memory to a state of health." Dr. Forbes Winslow adds that he has known other instances of temporary loss of memory cured within a short time by the free use of tonics and stimulants. " In these cases," he says, " the brain is generally in a starved and impoverished condition, arising from a deficient supply of blood ; it is in a state of enervation and inanition." On the other hand, the excessive use of stimulants produces unmis- takably mischievous effects. Temporary attacks of loss of memory have been caused by intemperance. " By an old Spanish law," Dr. Winslow mentions, " no person was admitted into the witness-box to give evidence in a disputed case who was proved to indulge in habits of intemperance, as an excessive use of stimulants was considered to weaken and destroy the memory." The following case is one of those in which sudden failure of memory implies serious cerebral mischief. "An eminent provincial surgeon, of large and anxious practice, was seized with a sudden failure of memory. He forgot all his appointments, and to such a degree was the faculty of retention impaired " (so far as the 278 NATURE STUDIES. names and cases of patients were concerned) "that he was obliged to make memoranda of every trifling and minute circumstance which it was important for him to remember, and to these he was constantly referring in order to refresh his memory. This attack was preceded by headache, of which he had com- plained for nearly a fortnight." Up to the period of the case being brought to the attention of Dr. Forbes Winslow, who treated it, no suspicion had been enter- tained of the existence of any prior state of cerebral ill- health, sufficient to account for the patient's sudden loss of mental power. Dr. Winslow ascertained, however, that " about eight weeks, or nearly three months previously " (not a very clear way of putting the matter, by the way), the patient had been seized, whilst in the act of applying a stethoscope to the chest of a patient, with severe epileptic vertigo. For about a second he lost consciousness. This had been succeeded by an attack of distressing sick headache. " Three days subsequently he had a second paroxysm of giddiness, and nearly fell out of the carriage in which he was sitting at the time. His spirits sub- sequently became much depressed, but in a few days he again rallied, flattering himself that he had quite recovered. He made no mention of these attacks to any member of his family, and carefully avoided all conversation on the subject of his health with his medical brethren." " When I saw this gentleman/' says Dr. Winslow, "the only appreciable, mental symptom was inability to retain in his mind, for many BRAIN TROUBLES. 279 -consecutive minutes, any recent impressions. His pulse was feeble, face pallid, and general health shat- tered. His spirits were, however, at times buoyant, and the prognosis which he formed of his own case was favourable/' The result showed that he was a false prophet. Two weeks later he had an epileptic fit. He then became rapidly worse, and ten months aften he died "in a deplorable state of mental im- becility." But against such a case as this, which was obviously exceptional, may be set the following case, in which, under similar conditions, so far as appearances were concerned, a complete cure was effected : — A barrister complained to Dr. Winslow of occasional attacks of enfeebled memory. " He attributed this mental im- pairment/' says Dr. Winslow, "to the fact of his having been engaged as counsel the previous year in several anxious and severely-contested election cases. I advised an entire cessation from all professional work, but had great difficulty in persuading him to recognise the necessity for a complete abstinence from mental occupation. He promised a guarded acquiescence in my strict injunctions, but finding himself relieved after an interval of a few weeks, he returned, in opposition to my solicitations, to his chambers, and recommenced active practice. As I predicted," proceeds Dr. Winslow, "he soon broke down, and I was once more conferred with. He then acknowledged it to be a matter of vital necessity that he should give his mind prolonged rest, and agreed 28o NATURE STUDIES. unreservedly to do so. I kept him for a period of two years from all anxious and severe mental occu- pation, and by that time his powers of mind had rallied to a surprising extent ; in fact, they became, according to his own impression, more vigorous than they were prior to his attack of illness. For many years this patient has continued steadily at work, never having had a return of loss of memory. I should premise that I extracted from him a promise that he would read no briefs after dinner. He has rigidly adhered to this understanding, but being an early riser and a man of remarkable quickness of apprehension, he is enabled to master a large amount of work before breakfast. I also made it a sine qua, iwn that he should go abroad every year for a period of two months, thus ensuring for him a complete diversion and relaxation of mind from all injurious pressure. He has scrupulously complied with my instructions, and the result is an entire freedom from all symptoms of mental impairment and cerebral dis- order." A case such as this is full of encouragement, because here it would seem, that at the outset over- work had seriously injured the brain, yet attention to a few simple rules resulted in a complete cure. Apart from actual injury to the substance of the brain, transient loss of memory seems to be usually caused by a deficient supply of blood to the brain, whether through loss of blood generally, or owing to defective circulation. This is illustrated by the following case : — A lady had been reduced to a state BRAIN TROUBLES. 2Sl of such extreme prostration by haemorrhage, that for nearly a week she seemed simply lingering between- life and death. After this she remained for a long time in a state of extreme mental depression and vital prostration. When she was able to articulate, her husband was astonished to find that her memory was paralysed. " She had forgotten where she lived, who her husband was, how long she had been ill, the names of her children, and, in fact, her own name was obliterated from her recollection. She was unable to call anything by its right name. In attempting to do so she made the most singular mistakes. She had been in the habit, before her illness, of speaking in French, her husband being a Frenchman ; but while in the state of mind described, she seemed to have lost all recollection of the French language. When her husband spoke to her in French, she did not seem to understand in the least what he was saying, though she could at this time speak English without diffi- culty. Seven or eight weeks elapsed before her memory began to improve, and months passed before her mind regained its original strength." Intense cold seems to have the power of paralysing the memory. During the retreat from Moscow, many of Bonaparte's officers and men found their memories greatly enfeebled. Bonaparte himself was affected, especially as to dates and names. "For a time he was constantly confusing one person with another, and making odd mistakes in dates." In his case the .affection of the memory lasted only a few 282 NATUEE STUDIES. days ; l but one of Bonaparte's aides-de-camp lost his memory for several years. Instances such as these enable us to understand the true meaning of those comparatively slight attacks of failure of memory which most of us experience from time to time. In the first place, we do not find much evidence enabling us to assign to one or other of the two classes of memory-failings above indicated a greater or less degree of importance, whether such failings occur in a marked or slight • degree only. Inability to commit new matter to the memory with customary facility seems as likely to be a sign of mischief as inability to recollect matters forming (ordinarily) a part of our stock of familiarly known facts. Again, it is clear we need not fear that the mind is necessarily going astray because for a time the memory fails in slight degree. We see that very serious failures of the power of memory may occur where the brain has suffered no irreparable mischief. But since we see that much overwork will cause serious temporary mischief of this particular kind, we 1 During this time Bonaparte's mind seems to have been affected. " He merely made some gestures of melancholy resig- nation on every occasion when," during the battle of Semenowska, the aides-de-camp sent by Ney " informed him of the death of his best generals. He rose several times to take a few turns, but immediately sat down again. Every one looked at the Emperor with astonishment. Hitherto, during these great shocks, he had displayed an active coolness ; but here only a dead calm, a mild and sluggish inactivity." Count Segur, referring to Napoleon's state at this time says : " The Eussian autumn had triumphed over him." BRAIN TROUBLES. 283 learn that where a slight lapse of memory is noticed, the indication may be taken as a sign that rest is needed. But there are, as we have seen, other ways in which this special power may come to be affected; so that if the memory should show signs of failure where we have no reason to believe that overwork has caused the mischief, we may infer that some one or other of the causes which, as we have seen, may affect the memory seriously have operated injuriously in slight degree. Nor in general need we be in much doubt as to the true nature of the cause, simply because we cannot fail (usually) to recognise in the circum- stances preceding the attack the origin of the mischief. Thus, although a serious failure of the memory con- sidered apart from the circumstances preceding it might leave the physician in doubt whether depletion or plethora (to mention two possible causes) had produced the mischief, yet the physician, apart even from an examination of the patient's condition, could learn at once from him whether either of these two opposite conditions had existed before the attack. In like manner, any person whose memory suddenly seemed weakened could, as his own physician, ascer- tain (unless, indeed, his memory failed to remind him how he had passed the hours or days preceding the attack) whether the mischief resulted from deficiency or excess in the amount of food or stimulants he had previously taken, whether the proper remedy would be, on the one hand, some such medicine as a glass of wine and a chop, or, on the other hand, a diminution 284 NATURE STUDIES. during two or three days of the amount of food consumed, or the avoidance of some of the more stimulating articles of diet. Here, however, we are considering rather those mental troubles which are produced by mental work, whether relating to subjects of great difficulty or carried on too long. We would notice also that in dealing with other indications of mental mischief we need not be careful to show how the more serious cases of each kind suggest the significance of the slighter and far commoner mental troubles which form our real subject of inquiry ; for this reason, simply that what we have here said about failure or loss of memory applies equally to other signs of temporary mischief. II— DISTKACTED ATTENTION. The next of these signs — one, indeed, which many mental physiologists set first — is an inability to fix the attention on any subject till the mind has done with it. We have taken the failure of memory first, simply because we believe that this symptom can ordinarily be recognised earlier than inability to fix the attention. The fact would seem to be that since in the ordinary processes of thought, we first recognise or ascertain particular facts, and then commit them to the keeping of the memory, the latter process is naturally the one- which first fails us. That it should be taken first is indicated, too, by the circumstance that although many cases can be cited of persons who, although BRAIN TROUBLES. 285 able to direct their attention to a subject, are unable to retain in their memory what has been suggested to their thoughts while thus directed, no case is on record in which this state of things has been reversed, and a person has been able to remember recent facts distinctly after he had lost the power of arriv- ing at fresh ideas by efforts of attention. To men- tion only one case of the former kind, Dr. Win slow tells of one patient whose memory as to recent events was seriously damaged, while yet his perceptive facul- ties and reasoning powers were not at all affected. "He conversed with great sagacity, fluency, and acuteness on every subject, but if I permitted a second to elapse in the conversation, he entirely forgot what he had been previously talking of." From the time when his memory thus failed him, he retained his former power of reasoning. "He could discuss at short intervals the most subtle and abstruse political, professional, and literary matters with apparently un- impaired mental vigour ; but his memory never reco- vered its healthy tenacity." It may hence be inferred that temporary loss of the power of fixing the atten- tion (which must be carefully distinguished from mere forgetfulness, that is, the habit of being inattentive), is more likely to be a sign of serious mental mischief, than failure of the power of memory. Yet the former, like the latter symptom, indicates in the great majority of cases, no serious mischief, though it would be exceedingly unwise to overlook it. The failure of the power of directing the attention 286 NATUEE STUDIES. to a subject may show itself in several ways. Thus the mind may be unable even to begin the study of a subject; or it may begin the study and presently wander off to other subjects, despite the most anxious efforts to restrain it from so doing; or suddenly it will seem to cease its action, remaining for a short time confused and as it were lost, and then resuming the consideration of the same subject at the point where it had left it, and apparently as acutely and attentively as before. These three forms of distraction are of different significance as symptoms of mental trouble. The first, though undoubtedly it would be very serious in this respect, if persistent, nearly always indicates only that the mind wants rest, and no one who is wise will neglect the warning. The second equally implies that the mind wants rest, though not in equal degree. But the third is usually a sign of serious mischief. We consider it here, not as belonging to those indications of mental dis- turbance which, witho.ut being alarming, should be attended to by all who wish to keep their brains in good working order, but because the nature of the cerebral mischief indicated by such symptoms has been ascertained, and we may hence infer the general nature of the mischief indicated when the less serious symptoms of distraction are recognised, and may so judge what is the appropriate remedy. For, unfor- tunately, several of the cases in which the mind has been observed suddenly to become confused or lost, resuming its activity and clearness after a short BEAIN TROUBLES. 287 interval,, have been followed by severe illness, which has proved eventually fatal. Amongst the most remarkable and carefully- observed cases of this kind is that of King Oscar of Sweden, the circumstances of which were minutely detailed by Dr. P. 0. Liljewalch, the king's first physician. King Oscar had enjoyed fairly good health, during the greater part of his life ; but before his last illness it had been noticed that occasionally the heart's action was irregular, oftener in spring than in other parts of the year. In 1851 the heart became very irregular in its movements, and the digestive functions were impaired. Although he soon after recovered to some degree, an attack of typhus fever, following the loss of a beloved son, severely tried his constitution. When slowly recovering strength after this, he un- wisely omitted his usual autumn rest and excursion, and devoted his mind to political matters requiring close and anxious attention. In 1857 his health again gave way, and it was at this time that the nervous mischief was first noticed, which subsequently proved the characteristic feature of the king's illness, and, in Dr. Liljewalch's opinion, "brought him to his death." The first trace of this nervous disease, says Liljewalch, "manifested itself long since, although it. was not until the last six or eight years of his life that, as we have seen, it occurred with more definite, and at last with such threatening symptoms. No one who had an opportunity of observing him during a long period in his daily intercourse, could avoid being amazed at the 288 NATUEE STUDIES. very extraordinary power the king always exhibited of retaining in his memory the most varied details, or oould cease admiring " (really one could imagine that some few could achieve this, however impossible it might seem to the courtly Liljewalch) "the rapid apprehension, the unerring judgment, and the singular clearness of statement which were exhibited whenever he spoke. But at the same time he could not fail to recollect how the king sometimes, in the middle of a conversation to which he was directing all his attention, would of a sudden appear to be abstracted, and would actually transfer his thoughts to some other subject on which, unless he might be disturbed, he would allow them to rest, usually only for a few moments, but sometimes for many minutes, after which the conversation would be resumed as if it had not been interrupted. The peculiar expression of the king's features — particularly his look, assumed on such occasions, and the spasmodic state, or the involuntary movements which at the same time took place in one or other part of his muscular system — render it pro- bable that this distraction, which at times was of frequent recurrence, was due to an incipient affection of the central organ of thought. This symptom, referable to the most important organ of the nervous system " (the care and ingenuity with which the court physician avoids any direct statement that the king's brain was effected is worthy of all praise) " was of late years accompanied, as has been already mentioned, with increasing weakness in the muscles of the BEAIN TROUBLES. 289 lower extremities, and with uncertainty in the combi- nation of movement, probably depending on a com- mencing organic change, either in the organ alone on which the power of motion depends, or else in that by which the co-ordination of movements is effected." The king himself was not misled by the phraseology in which the court physicians endeavoured to cloak the fact that his brain was disordered. " Incapacity to discharge his royal functions now brought on a deep melancholy, and the king, even in the com- mencement of his illness, expressed his conviction of its incurability." The strength of the body failed more and more as " the organ on which the power of motion depends " became more and more diseased. "The lower extremities, the muscles of which were always weak, began to totter under the weight of the body, and at the same time the power of combination for the motions of those parts was impaired, and the king was troubled with vertigo, particularly accom- panying the movements of the head, and with vomiting, which symptoms, in combination with diminution of strength and the occurrence of involuntary muscular spasms, indicated the existence of a more deeply- seated affection, probably a softening in the central nervous system." (One could imagine that as, of old, Spanish courtiers adopted the conventional hypothesis that a Queen of Spain has no legs, Dr. Liljewalch held that the Kings of Sweden, and " royal personages" gene- rally, have no brains.) The means employed to com- bat the disease produced no good effects; "the 290 NATURE STUDIES. paralysis, which commenced in the lower extremities, gradually increased, and, after the king, feeling his inability any longer to fill the high position to which Providence had called him, transferred into the hands of the crown prince the government of the United Kingdoms, his deep melancholy gave way to a pro- gressive indifference, even for those things which in his health he had regarded with the most lively inte- rest." The rest of Dr. Liljewalch's account relates to the gradual failing of King Oscar's powers, mental and bodily, and is too technical to be quoted verbatim. It is noteworthy that the power of speech began to be affected early during the progress of the disorder, and later was lost altogether. From this we should be led to regard failure in the power of verbal expression as a later, and therefore a more alarming, symptom of cerebral mischief, than diminution of the power of fixing the attention. The post-mortem examination of King Oscar revealed extensive disorganisation of the brain. A case somewhat similar to that of King Oscar is related by Dr. Forbes Winslow : — f< A gentleman con- nected with the Stock Exchange was suspected to have disease of the brain. His symptoms were as fol- lows : general muscular weakness, occasional paroxysms of severe headache, slight paralysis of the superior palpebras and of the left eye, occasional sensation of numbness in the right foot. The mind was not appa- rently at all impaired. He continued, up to the period of my being consulted, fully competent to discharge BEAIN TROUBLES. 291 all his commercial duties, attended to liis accounts' and wrote letters of business with his usual ability and clearness. His brother informed me that at times he was greatly abstracted and extracted; that whilst engaged in conversation, he would suddenly pause, put his hand to his head, and appeared vexed with himself at having lost all consciousness of what he was saying. This symptom was observed two years before any question arose, or suspicion existed, as to the state of the brain ! The family, judging from the subsequent progress of the case, were of opinion that the cerebral disorder was first exhibited by the sudden lapses of thought to which he was subject for many years previously to the manifestations of •other and more unequivocal symptoms of brain dis- ease. Such, also, was my opinion In about a year and a half he died, quite paralytic. Consider- able organic disease of the brain was discovered after death." In another case, which also ended fatally, an Irish barrister, three years before an attack of acute mania, was observed to stop occasionally while addressing the courts of law, as if for the moment lost. "So marked was this symptom, that a professional friend, often associated with him in the conduct of legal matters, considered it his duty to direct the attention of the gentleman's wife to the fact, considering that such attacks of mental distraction, on occasions when it was of essential importance for the mind to be in a .state of continuous activity, looked suspicious, and, u 2 292 NATUEE STUDIES. according to his judgment, were not consistent with a healthy state of the brain." About two years after this peculiarity had been noticed, this patient expe- rienced a slight epileptiform seizure whilst at his chambers, during a very hot day in the month of July. " As this attack was considered to have been one of syncope, and to be caused by the then high state of the temperature, little or no notice was taken of it. Previously to travelling on the Continent, he had been working unusually hard, eating and drinking very sparingly, sitting up late at night, and rising early in the morning. In fact, he acted with great indiscretion and imprudence, and the result was an attack of brain disease, affecting the mind, a fort- night after his arrival in Paris." In this case, the post-mortem examination revealed the existence of chronic disease of the membranes of the brain — mis- chief which seemed to have lasted for a considerable- time before death. As we have already explained, it is not so easy to find illustrative cases of the less alarming forms of dis- traction. Even in cases where serious mischief has followed these slighter mind-troubles, the symptoms immediately preceding such serious illness have com- monly been of a more marked kind, and these alone have usually been regarded as really belonging to the case. Nevertheless, all who have given careful atten- tion to mental maladies, can speak of instances in which the less serious forms of distraction have been noticed early in the progress of cerebral disorders ; so BRAIN TROUBLES. 293 that, though they need not alarm those who note them in their own case, they should not be neglected. They are always signs that the mind wants rest, and they may be signs that some more specific remedy is required, which can be readily determined by noting whether rest brings relief. " I am anxious," says Dr. Forbes Winslow (and it could be wished that throughout his valuable work he had been similarly careful to avoid occasioning unnecessary alarm), "to attach no undue importance to this evidence of morbid intelligence, but I cannot close my eyes to the fact that a debili- tated power of attention is a prominent symptom in the early stage of cerebral disorder. Cases of in- cipient brain disease have occurred in which patients have, previously to other symptoms, lost all ability to read continuously twenty lines of a book without a painful effort of thought/' It will be noticed that Dr. Winslow here puts distraction as a phenomenon preceding, in cases of cerebral disorder, the loss of memory : albeit, we believe that had he had the means of ascertaining the precise progress of mental disorder, in cases where . he supposed this to have been the case, he would have found that the memory had begun to go in the first instance. "If," he proceeds, " there be impairment of attention and debility of memory, it is illusory for the patient to imagine that he is able, until his physical condition of ill-health is attended to, by repeated and persevering efforts, to resuscitate these prostrated powers. In his attempt to do so he still further taxes the morbid 294 NATURE STUDIES. state of these faculties" (meaning, apparently, that he overtaxes the faculties, and makes them still more morbid), "and, instead of invigorating, still further debilitates, and often entirely extinguishes his intel- ligence." This caution cannot be too carefully at- tended to. Returning to the analogy between bodily and mental powers, which we touched upon at the outset, we may compare the power of attention to actual muscular strength, — as the power of memory may be compared to skill in mastering such and such feats of muscular dexterity, and acquired mental know- ledge to the various athletic exercises which a man has learned to achieve. Now if an athlete finds that his bodily strength is unequal to a task which has hitherto been well within his powers, he would not think (if he were wise) of trying repeatedly to achieve the muscular effort which he has found too much for him. Or (extending the analogy to other ways in which the power of attention may fail) if an athlete finds that he is unable to continue some muscular effort so long as usual, he does not compel Nature to achieve the task which for. the nonce has become too great for him. In either case he perceives that for the time being he is not himself, and by rest or change of some kind (diet, mode of training, or the like), he seeks to restore his powers. At any rate, if he is so unwise, in either case, as to endeavour to master Nature, he increases the mischief, and may entirely lose the powers which had been weakened, and might otherwise have been soon restored, or might at least BEAIN TEOUBLES. 295 liave been saved from furfclier weakening. So, remem- bering how close in reality is the analogy between the mental and bodily powers, we can well believe Dr. Forbes Win slow, when he tells us that when the attempt to fix and concentrate thet noughts requires a continuous, painful, and vigorous effort of the will, "serious and irreparable injury may be done to the delicate organisation of the brain and mind by inju- dicious attempts to exercise, stimulate, and force into activity the morbidly nagging and sluggish mental faculties/' These symptoms show that the brain is for the time being unfit for sustained action or for intense action, though not necessarily (or even pro- bably) diseased, and that rest is essential to restore its enfeebled energies. Whether such rest should be long-continued or not, will depend upon the question whether the symptoms of weakened powers of atten- tion are marked or otherwise, and also in no slight degree on the length of time during which these symptoms, whatever they may be, have been neg- lected. If they are attended to so soon as they are noticed (in which case they will probably be slight), a very brief rest will generally restore to the mind its wonted energies. Many a man, who in the midst of prolonged and arduous mental exertion, has noticed signs of flagging in his power of attention, has found in even half an hour of sound sleep a remedy more effective than a three months' rest would be after such signs had been neglected during several successive weeks of mental labour. 296 NATURE STUDIES. Some physiologists assert that defective speech, the next symptom which we have to deal with, has been the first symptom noticed in cases of cerebral disorder. Dr. Forbes Winslow says: — "The first evidence of approaching apoplexy and paralysis is occasionally a sudden loss of speech." This may have been the first symptom noticed, but we question very much whether it has ever been the first symptom which has existed. We ought to distinguish, perhaps here, between defective speech and defective power of expression (by words indicated otherwise than by actual articula- tion). In fact, an important distinction exists even between the loss of the power of articulation and the affection of the vocal organs indicative of cerebral disease. Here, however, we consider generally the impairment of the power of linguistic expression which usually precedes serious mental trouble, and is often enough noticed where rest only or change of diet is necessary as a remedy. Usually, however, this symptom is serious. Indeed, one writer on the sub- ject of cerebral disease remarks that it is a most unusual circumstance for the symptom to exist with- out being followed by acute cerebral mischief. Possibly the remark refers only to the absolute loss, whether for a short or long period, of the power of expressing ideas by language, spoken or written. That the power of expression may be effected, and even for a time affected seriously, while nevertheless there is no serious cerebral mischief, is within the experience cf BRAIN TROUBLES. 297 most persons who have occasion to exercise this power freely. The symptom, like others we have dealt with here, is one to be noticed, and its warning voice should be heeded early. This done, there is usually little occasion for alarm, startling though some of the stories now to be related may appear. Dr. Winslow relates that "a literary gentleman, whose vocation in life was that of a public lecturer, noticed for nearly eight weeks before he was seized with paralysis, that occasionally whilst speaking he lost for a second or two all power of articulation. This occurred on five or six occasions previously to an attack of decided hemiplegia. This patient had taxed his powers of mind to their utmost by lecturing twice, and often thrice, a day; but independently of this amount of literary labour, he had been exposed to much anxiety respecting family matters, and this had produced restless, and, in some instances, sleepless nights." TIL— PARTIAL LOSS OF SPEECH. Let us consider next a case where the almost com- plete loss of the power of fixing the attention was followed by the partial loss of the power of expression, — a sequence which would, we believe, be far more commonly noticed than usual were all the circum- stances of each case carefully noted. The case also illustrates the dangers resulting from the endeavour to over- tax the powers of nature : — " I was engaged this morning," says Dr. Alexander Crichtoii, " with 298 NATUEE STUDIES. a great number of people,, who followed each other quickly, and to each of whom I was obliged to give my attention. I was also under the necessity of writing much, but the subjects were various, and of a trivial and uninteresting nature, and had no con- nexion the one with the other ; my attention, there- fore, was constantly kept on the stretch, and it was continually shifting from one subject to another. At last it became necessary that I should write a receipt for some money I had received on account of the poor. I seated myself, and wrote the two first words, but in a moment found that I was incapable of proceeding, for I could not recollect the words which belonged to the ideas that were present in my mind. I strained my attention as much as possible, and tried to write one letter slowly after the other, always having an eye in order to observe whether they had the usual relationship to each other ; but I remarked, and said to myself at the time, that the characters I was writing were not those which I wished to write, and yet I could not discover where the fault lay. I therefore desisted, and partly by words and syllables, and partly by gestures, I made the person who waited for the receipt understand that he should leave me. For about half an hour there reigned a kind of tumultuous disorder of my senses, in which I was incapable of remarking anything very particular, except that one series of ideas forced them- selves involuntarily into my mind." The patient goes on to describe the various thoughts which occurred BEAIN TROUBLES. 299 to him at this time, and how he tested his mental condition by thinking of the principles of religion, conscience, and the future life, finding to his relief that these principles he found " equally correct and fixed as before " (a degree of assurance which some do not possess who are quite free from mental dis- order). Passing over these matters, as not bearing specially on our subject, we find that so soon as he tested his power of expressing his ideas, either by spoken or by written words, he found that for the time being the power was lost. " I endeavoured to speak, in order to discover whether I was capable of saying anything that was connected ; but although I made the greatest efforts of attention, and proceeded with the utmost caution, I perceived that I uniformly spoke other words than I intended. My soul was at present as little master of the organs of speech as it had been before of my hand in writing. Thank God, this state did not continue very long, for in about half an hour my head began to grow clearer, the strange and tiresome ideas became less vivid and tur- bulent, and I could command my own thoughts with less interruption.-'' It is interesting to notice how the loss of the power of expression was associated thus with confusion of thought and inability to fix the attention. " I now wished," proceeds the patient, 1 c to ring for my servant, and desired him to inform my wife to come to me." (The power of correctly expressing his ideas does not seem to have been possessed in any very remarkable degree by this 300 NATURE STUDIES. gentleman, even when his mind had fully recovered its usual health.) " But I found it still necessary to wait a little longer, to exercise myself in the right pronunciation of the few words I had to say, and the first half-hour's conversation I had with her was, on my part, preserved with a slow and anxious circum- spection, until at last I gradually found myself as -clear and serene as in the beginning of the day. All that now remained was a slight headache. I re- collected the receipt I had begun to write, and in which I knew I had blundered, and upon examining it, I observed to my great astonishment, that instead of the words fifty dollars, being one half-year's rate, which I ought to have written, the words were, fifty dollars, through the salvation of Bra , with a break .after it, for the word ' Bra ' was at the end of the line. I cannot recollect any business I had to transact that could by means of an obscure influence have pro- duced this phenomenon." In this case it is obvious that the temporary loss of the power of verbal expression was occasioned by overwork ; but it is noteworthy that the work was of a special character, involving the special exercise of the power which failed first (that of fixing the atten- tion). It may be worth while to inquire whether that kind of mental confusion, which, when it has passed beyond a certain point is followed by impairment of the power of speech, is generally or often a conse- quence of distracting occupations. The following case seems to some degree to bear on this question. It is BEAIN TEOUBLES. SOL related by Dr. Watson. A patient who Lad had an- attack of apoplexy seemed to be recovering under the influence of perfect quiet. But, " after a long and imprudent conversation with a friend, he suddenly lost the thread of his discourse, and could not recover it." Memory was affected first, be it observed : next went the power of attention. " Then he became conf used/* Thirdly, the power of speech was affected. " He misapplied words. I asked him how he felt. He- answered, ( Not quite right/ and this he repeated very many times, abbreviating it at first into ' not right/ and at length into 'n'ight/ Wishing to mention* ( camphor,' he called it 'pamphlet.' I mention these as specimens." Afterwards, signs of bodily weakness, indicating paralysis, were observed. The weakness degenerated gradually into complete palsy, and before- long the case ended fatally. In this case the patient had not suffered originally from undue mental work,, the mental trouble being caused by an abscess. But the case seems to illustrate well the trying effect of distracting conversation on a wearied, weakened, or (as in this case) diseased brain. The tendency to use one word for another, where, so far as meaning is concerned, there is no connexion whatever, though there is some resemblance of sound, is one which probably most literary men have noticed at times, when they have been wearied or their atten- tion has been much distracted. It is not by any means so alarming a symptom as temporary failure of the power of articulating words, or actual inability to 302 NATUEE STUDIES. write tlie desired words; but it is a circumstance which should not be overlooked. A little rest, or the substitution for a while of some light reading for hard brain-work, will generally set matters right. If not, a longer rest or open-air exercise should be taken. Time will be gained by waiting till the brain is fitter for work. I have repeatedly had occasion to time myself over certain forms of literary work, and my experience has been this, that where four or five hours are to be occupied in steady work, a good half -hour will often be saved by taking half an hour's sleep, when such signs of mental weariness are noticed as have been described above. There is, however, one point to be observed. Rest must be taken as soon as such signs are recognised, for if an effort is made to struggle against the occasion for rest, the power of resting may be lost. Precisely as an over-tired pedestrian often tries in vain to sleep when he has but a short time for rest, so the over- wearied brain may be kept by confusing thoughts from obtaining rest. IV.— THE ECHO SIGN. A symptom called the ' e eclw " sign, which usually indicates very serious brain mischief, has, like other such signs, its analogue among the symptoms of minor mental trouble. Most of us have noticed how, when we are weary and overworked, we are apt to repeat mentally words or sounds which we have heard or had BEAIN TROUBLES. 303 occasion to utter. Sometimes the tendency becomes exceedingly annoying — a circumstance which, though not necessarily indicating serious mischief, must be regarded as a warning not to be neglected. On one occasion, a time of great domestic trouble, I was haunted for two or three days in succession by these three chords, repeated in the way here indicated. D.C. ad inf. ^ frfr-4- a» «-tf» «j»-^ «- -& <9-&~o-&-ig- They had been first heard (or imagined, perhaps) during church-time on a calm, still Sunday, when, after several days of cold and bitter winter weather, the sun shone brightly, and the air was warm and pleasant. There was illness " even unto death " in the house, and a loss such as changes the colour of life was approaching. But probably, long and anxious night-watching had more to do with this strange affection of the mind than anxiety or sorrow. The haunting chords ceased only during sleep (a trained nurse had the evening before taken my place) ; when consciousness returned, after heavy dreamless sleep, the chords were heard again, now loud and clear, anon distant and indistinct, usually in slow succession, with rather long intervals between each triplet, but at times less slowly and with scarcely the intermission of a single bar's rest. At another time, I should probably have been rendered exceedingly anxious by the monotonous repetition of these mental chords, 304 NATURE STUDIES. though I might have found it difficult to determine whether they indicated or were the cause of mental mischief. As it was, other thoughts engrossed my mind too much to allow of any anxiety on this account ; and after a few days the chords ceased to trouble me ; though to this day I am careful not to allow the mental voice to utter these sounds to the mental ear, lest again the chords should begin to be monotonously repeated. It is probable that this particular mental trouble ceased as it began, apart from any act on my own part; still it may be worth mentioning that I obtained relief, and was, at the time, under the impression that I had driven away the haunting chords, by adding mentally, after each set of six chords, a series of others, as follows l : — -morcndo. -T = — I — ^ L J 1 — 1 1 T— *3&=2 I noticed that the interval before the paired chords began to be mentally heard again, gradually increased, after the above plan had been followed, until the intervals of silence became so long that the mind 1 It is probably not necessary for me to explain to musicians that I know nothing whatever of harmony. Perhaps the above arrangements of chords is full of mistakes, so far as the laws of harmony are concerned, but it represents exactly, first, the chords w^ich troubled me, and secondly, those which I added to put the former out of my head. BRAIN TROUBLES. 305 could, as it were, forget that it was troubled by these haunting notes. The " echo " or repetition sign, as we have said, is commonly indicative of serious cerebral mischief. Dr. Winslow was of opinion that it arose, to some extent, from that sluggish and abstracted state of thought, amounting to reverie, which is so often seen in cases of long-existing and sometimes undetected affections of the brain. " The mind seems incapable," he says, "of apprehending, under these circumstances, the most simple questions, and, parrot-like, repeats them. I have noticed this symptom in other conditions of depressed vital and nervous power, but it more par- ticularly accompanies softening of some portion of the brain." It can scarcely be doubted that the monoto- nous mental repetition of words or sounds is indicative of mental trouble ; yet not necessarily or probably of any really serious mischief. Rest or change of occu- pation will in general prove a sufficient remedy. If not, it is time to seek for advice, though rather from a sensible general practitioner (preferably a family doctor) than from those who have directed special attention to cerebral diseases ; for the latter are apt to alarm patients by suggesting the possibility, or even the probability, of approaching mental derangement. As an illustration at once of the morbid phenomena of speech, and of the tendency among certain students of mental disease to exaggerate the significance of such phenomena, we may take the following passage from. Dr. Forbes Winslow's book : — " It will not be 3o6 NATURE STUDIES. out of place/' he says, " to direct attention to a pre- cursory symptom, not only of approaching paralysis,, but of insanity. I allude to the practice of many patients suffering from incipient brain and mind disease, of talking aloud when alone. A distinguished physician observed this symptom to precede an attack of paralysis, in the case of a nobleman who for many years was Prime Minister of this country. In many cases of irritation of the brain, as well as of structural disease, the patient is observed to talk to himself, and the commencement of insanity is often detected by this symptom." True, Dr. Winslow goes on to say that this eccentric habit is consistent with a perfect state of health of body and mind ; but these few words suggesting comfort to those who occasionally talk to themselves, are likely to be overlooked in a long passage indicating this common habit as one of the signs of approaching insanity. V.— IRRITABILITY. Among the most characteristic signs of mental weariness, irritability may be mentioned. We use the word rather in its technical than in its ordinary sense. Nervous irritation may be indicated quite as much by gloom and melancholy, as by temper or impatience. When we find ourselves disposed to take unreasonably gloomy or unreasonably fretful views of our affairs, to be troubled or vexed (that is, made sorry or angry) by trifling matters, we may be assured that there is some- BRAIN TROUBLES. 307 thing wrong with. us. The mischief may be bodily, or it may arise from external causes; but usually — at any rate with those who exercise the mind more actively than the body — the cause of the change is mental. It is not always easy to distinguish between these various forms of irritability. Those who are affected by the east wind can ascertain, when they find themselves out of sorts, whether the wind is easterly or not ; but it is probable that the mere liability to be thus affected is a sign of nervous weak- ness, which may result from mental overwork.1 And there are s'ome meteorological causes of irritability not so easily inquired into as the influence of an 1 Dr. Forbes Winslow discribes a curious instance of morbid irritability of this kind. " A military man, suffering from severe mental dejection, was in the habit," he tells us, " of promenading backward and forward in a certain track, towards evening on the rampart of the town in which he resided. When he walked for- ward, his face fronted the east, where the sky was hung with black, as was, alas ! his poor soul. Then his grief pressed doubly an heavily upon him ; he was hopeless and in deep despair. But when he turned with his countenance towards the west, where the setting sun left behind a golden stream of light, his happiness returned, Thus he walked backward and forward, with and without hope, alternating between joy and melancholy, ecstasy and grief, in obedience to the baleful and benign influence[s] of the eastern and western sky ! " Alfieri says, in his " Memoirs," " I have observed, by applying to my intellect an excellent barometer, that I had greater or less genius or capacity for composition according to the greater or less weight of the atmosphere : a total stupidity during the solstitial and equinoctial winds ; an infinitely less perspicacity in the evening than in the morning ; and much more fancy enthusiasm, and invention in midsummer than in the intervening months. x 2 308 NATURE STUDIES. easterly wind. (Has it been commonly noticed, or is the experience exceptional in the writer's case, that when the mind has been heavily taxed, blusterous weather produces the effects usually attributed to easterly winds ?) Again : some of the forms of irritability due to bodily mischief are not easily distinguished from those due to mental overwork. Thus, a case is related of a young man noted for his gentleness, who, forming one evening a member of a brilliant party (his com- panions being of his own age), was quarrelsome and cross-grained, wrangling with, and in the end offend- ing, everybody in the room. Two hours after he was seized with nephritic torments, caused by a calculus, which did not cease to trouble him till the next day. I can recall an even more striking case of the sort in my own experience. I had been struck by my exceed- ing ill-temper (which, utterly wrong-headed though it seemed, I felt quite unable to control), while visiting at the request of several of the professors of Yale College, the laboratories and technological collections of that institution. I could in no way distinguish this irritability from that which I had learned to regard as the effect of over-work. But it continued (though I ha