H ^1 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW Vol. I, No. I January, 1905 DEVOTED TO ALL PHASES OF NATURE-STUDY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CONTENTS [ntroduclion Nature-Study and Natural Science — A Symposium 2 H. W. Fairbanks, C. F. Hodge, T. TI. Macuride, F. L. Sievens, M. A. BiGELOW. Physical Nature- Study. John F. Woodhuli 18 Nature-Study and Elementary Agriculture in Canada. \V. 11. Mli.drew .... 20 Some Recent Criticisms of Nature-Study. F. M. McMurrv ani> H. F. Arm- strong 22 Agriculture in Southern Schools. C. W. Burketi 27 School-Gardens. H. I). IIemenway 28 Ant-Nests for the Schoolroom. Adele M. Fielde 37 Book Reviews and Notes on Recent Literature 40 Guide to Periodical Literature. Ada Watterson 45 Questions and Answers 47 Discussions and Correspondence 48 News Notes 48 $1.00 a Volume (6 Nos.) 41 North Queen St., Lancaster, Pa. AND 525 West i20th St., Nev^ York City 20 Cents a Copy Application made for entry as second-class matter at the Lancaster, Pa., Post Office. Published bi-monthly. Copyright, iQOf, I'V M A. Bigelow, Managing Editor. l:^9o-^ THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW DEVOTED TO ALL. PHA.SES OF NATURE-STUDY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Six numbers per volume (year). Subscription price, $i.oo; single copies 20 cents. Sample copy (no special selection of numl)er) for 6 cents in stamps. Postage to addresses outside of the United States, Canada and Mexico, 20 cents per volume extra. Discounts of 20 per cent, for live or more copies to one address. Rates for clubs and commissions to agents given on application. Remittances may be made by express or post-office orders or bank paper payable at par in A^ew Tork. The New York banks charge for collecting checks on banks outside of the city, except those in Bos- ton, Philadelphia, and a few^ other places near New York. Receipts arc sent for all remittances. Address all communications to THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW, 525 West 1 20th St., New York City. EDITORIAL COMMITTEE L. H. Bailey, Dean of College of Agriculture, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. H. W. Fairbanks, Geologist and Author of Text-books of Geography, Berkeley, Cal. C. F. Hodge, Professor of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, Mass. J. F. WooDHULL, Professor of Physical Science, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City. M. A. BiGELOW, Adjunct Professor of Biology, Teachers College, Columbia University, Managitig Editor. ADVISERS AND COLLABORATORS FROM GREAT BRITAIN MiALL, Professor of Biology, Yorkshire College. Thomson, Professor of Natural History, University of Aberdeen. FROM UNITED STATES AND CANADA Andrews, Professor of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. Bardwell, District Superintendent of Schools, New York City. Bessey, Professor of Botany, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb. BiGELOW, Departmental Editor of St. Nicholas and Lecturer, Stamford, Conn. BoYDEN, Vice- Principal of Bridgewater (Mass.) Normal School. Branson, Principal of State Normal School, Athens, Ga. Bertha M. Brown, Department of Biology, Hyannis (Mass.) Normal School. C. \V. Burkett, Professor in North Carolina College of Agriculture, W. Raleigh, N. C. ( Continued on the third cover page. ) L. C. J- A. E. A D. L C. E. E. F. A. C. E. C. THE KATURE-STUDY REVIEW Your first questions regarding this new Journal are answered below. What is The new Journal will deal with all the ♦* Natural-Science" its field? studies of the common schools. For whom For all who are directly or indirectly interested in nature^ is it intended? study and natural science in general education. What will it publish f Original articles by the leaders in science teaching, and notes and reviews summarizing papers in the general journals and books. By whom conducted and published? By an editorial committee of five members with the co- operation or over sixty advisers and collaborators. It is entirely independent of local or individual interests, and needs the cooperation of all persons interested in science teaching. How supported ^^ must ultimately depend upon subscriptions for finan- financially ? cial support. All income exceeding cost of publication will be used for improvements in size and form. It ought to be a monthly ; but this will depend upon the support received. What shall 1 do to help? Send your subscription on a Postal Card, or use the blanks en other side of this page ; send the names of others who may be interested ; and keep the editors in touch with the advances of nature-study in your locality. THE NATUKE-STUDY KEVIEW The blanks below are for your convenience in sending your subscrip- tion or those of others ; but if a postal card is at hand now send names and addresses and make payment any time before April. SUBSCRIPTION FORM $i Per volume The Nature-Study Review, Date jj-j West i2oth Street, Nevj York: Please enroll 7?ie as a subscriber to Volume lofTms. Nature-Study Review. Name^ Address^ 1 Enclosed^ $ (See note on money orders and bank checks on the second page of cover. ) SUBSCRIPTION FORM $^ P" volume The Nature-Study Review, Date 5^5 West i2otk Street, Netv York : Please enroll me as a subscriber to Volume I of The Nature-Study Review. Name^ Address^ Enclosed^ $ (See note on money orders and bank checks on the second page of cover.) REMITTANCE FORM The Nature-Study Review, 5^5 West i2oth Street, New York : Enclosed is $i.00 in payment of my subscription previously sent to The Nature-Study Review. (See note on money orders and bank checks on the second page of cover.) Name^ Address. Nature-Study Publications ^* FIRST YEAR Welsh's Some of Our Friends, 30c, 40c * Davis' Nature Stories for Youngest Readers, 30c, 40c Chase's Plant Babies and Their Cradles, 30c. 40c Welsh's Out Doors, Animal Land Series, 30c, 40c Kelly's Introduction to Leaves From Nature's Story Book, 30c, 40c SECOND YEAR Chase's Buds, Stems and Roots, 30c, 40c Chase's Some of Our Flower Friends, 30c, 40c Chase's Friends of the Fields, 30c, 40c Chase's Stories from Birdland. Vol. L 300,400 THIRD YEAR Fairbanks' Home Geography. 60c Kelly's Leaves from Nature's Story-Book. Vol. I. 40c, 60c Stories from Garden and Field, 30c, 40c Legends of the Springtime. 3-4. 30c. 40c Chase's Stories from Birdland. Vol. H. 300,400 FOURTH YEAR Kelly's Leaves From Nature's Story Book. Vol. II. 40c, 60c Poyntz's Aunt May's Bird Talks, 500 Pratt's Little Flower Folks. Vol. I. Stories from Flowerland, 300, 400 Chase's Stories from Animal Land, 50c. 750 Greenleaf's Stories and Tales from the Animal World, 500 Bryant's Poetry of Flowerland, 75c FIFTH YEAR Kelly's Leaves From Nature's Story Book. Vol. III. 400,60c Bryant's Poetry of Flowerland, 75c Pratt's Little Flower Folks ; or Stories Prom Flowerland. Vol. II. 300, 40c Pratt's Storyland of S:ars, 400, 500 SIXTH YEAR M. and E. Kirby's Stories About Birds, $1.00 D'Anvers' Science Ladders. Vol. II. 40c Bryant's Poetry of Flowerland Chandler's Habits of California Plants, 60c SEVENTH YEAR D'Anvers' Science Ladders. Vol. III. 40c Flagg's A Year With the Birds, $1.00 Knox's Horse Stories and Stories of Other Animals. $2.50 Pratt's Fairyland of Flowers, $1.00, $1.25 EIGHTH YEAR Giberne's Ocean of Air, $1.25 Fairbanks' Stories of Rocks and Minerals, 60c Flagg's A Year Among the Trees, gi.oo Wood-Allen's Man ^Vonderful ; or The Mar- vels of Our Bodily Dwelling, $1.00 White's Natural History of Selborne, 25c * Where two prioes are given, the first is for boards, the other for cloth. ** The grades given are merely suggestive and the books may be used for grades lower or higher, according to the ability of the class. ANY BOOK S:B:NT POSTPAID ON RHCmPT OP PRICn EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING COMPANY, PUBLISHERS OF School Text Books, Supplementary Readers, School Library Books DEPT. 34, 5o BROMFIELD STREET, BOSTON I M: P» O It T^ IV T ...INATURH BOOKS... BURKETT, STEVENS, and HILL'S Agriculture for Beginners. COMSTOCK'S Ways of the Six-Footed. ROTH'S First Book of Forestry. ATKINSON'S First Studies of Plant Life. GOULD'S Mother Nature's Children. STRONG'S All the Year Round. HODGE'S NATURE STUDY AND LIFE From the " Outlook." "This is a charming book full of a varied interest in the plants, insects, birds and larger animals that come under observation in house and garden. While level to the capacity of children, it is a book which many adults will find both entertaining and instructive. Its value is enhanced by the practical utilizing of acquired knowledge. LONG'S WOOD FOLK SERIES Ways of Wood Folk. Wilderness Ways. Secrets of the Woods. Wood Folk at School. EDDY'S Friends and Helpers. ANDREWS' Stories of My Four Friends. Stories Mother Nature Told her Child- ren. PORTER'S Stars in Song and Legend. GINN & COMPANY Publishers BOSTON NEW YORK CHICAGO LONDON The elevation of Geography to the place it ought to hold in the school curriculum, is a matter of vital moment. — GEIKIE The JOURNAL of GEOGRAPHY AN ILLUSTRATED MAGAZINE DEVOTED TO THE INTERESTS OF TEACHERS OF GEOGRAPHY IN ELEMENTARY, SECONDARY, AND NORMAL SCHOOLS It is INDISPENSABLE to teachers of geography It stands for PROGRESS Each issue is USABLE INDORSED EVERYWHERE by usage The only geographical magazine .for TEACHERS OF GEOGRAPHY Edited by RICHARD E. DODGE, Professor of Geography, Teachers College, Coluvibia University, New York City. SUBSCRIPTION PRICE $i 50 A YEAR SEND FOR SAMPLE COPY TO THE JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY TEACHERS COLLEGE, NEW YORK CITY THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW A BI-MONTHLY JOURNAL DEVOTED TO ALL PHASES OF NATURE-STUDY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS EDITORIAL COMMITTEE LIBERTY H. BAILEY, Agriculture CLINTON F. HODGE, Biology CORNELL UNIVERSITY CLARK UNIVERSITY HAROLD W. FAIRBANKS, Geography JOHN F. WOODHULL, Physical Science BERKELEY, CAL. TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MAURICE A. BIGELOW, Biology TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MANAGING EDITOR Volume I, 1905 Published by M. A. BICrELOW, Managing Ei)ir(^K 525 West 120TH Street NEW YORK CITY X39 0l Press of The New Era printing Company lancaster, pa. Index to Volume I. [ Names of contributors are printed in small capitals. Abbreviated titles of books reviewed are in quotation marks. The abbreviation n.-s. for nature-study is used.] Agriculture, Elementary, in Canada, 20 ; in South, C. W. Burkett, 2"] ; Practical Studies, 135 Agriculture and n.-s., 141, 143, 148, 171, 231 Aims of n.-s., 49 Ants, Nests for, 37 ; Life of, 239, A. M. FlELDE Armstrong, H. E., Criticisms of n.-s., 26 Bacteria in soil, 134 Bailey, L. H,, Value of names, 200 ; " Outlook to Nature," T. H. Mac- bride, 2^7 Bee-Hive, A. B. Comstock, 109; E. F. BiGELOW, 202 Bees, 172, 235 BiGELOw, A, N., Weed's " Bird Life Stories," 86 BiGELOW, E. F., Plants without soil, 69; "Nature Study," F. L. Charles, 83 ; Value of names, 198; Bee-hive, 202 BiGELOw, M. A., Editorial Introduc- tion, I, 3; n.-s. and Science, 14; Comstock's " Butterflies," 41 ; Hornaday's " Natural History," 49 ; Value and aims of n.-s., 54 ; n.-s. in high schools, yj ; Root's " Bee Culture," 130; Carter's Nature- Study, 131; Protective colors, 159; Temperance Physiology, 261 ; Plants that hide, 262 ; Goodrich's " Book of Farming," 270 ; Dear- ness' "n.-s. Course," 271; "Cor- nell Leaflets," 271 ; " California School Gardens," 272 Birds, Life Stories, 86 ; Pamphlets on, 43, 134; Classification, 140, Appeal for, 221 ; Enemies, 2Ty Broadhurst, J., Overton's " Nature Study," 229 Brown, M. T., Making a School Lawn, 120 Burkett, C. W., Agriculture in Southern Schools, 2"] Burroughs on Protective Colors, M. A. Bigelow, 159 Butterflies, and Birds, 209, 276 ; at resi, 275 Canada, n.-s. in, 20 Carse, E., Carter's " Animal Stories," 81 Carter, M. H., " Animal Stories," E. Carse, 81 ; " n.-s. with Common Things," 131 ; Facts Discovered by Children, 266 Charles, F, L., Bigelow's " Nature Study," 83 Children, as Discoverers, 163, 266 Clute, W. N,, Butterflies and birds, 2^6 CocKERELL, T. D. A., Facts discov- ered by children, 163 ; Birds eating butterflies, 209, Butterflies, 275 Collaborators, 80 Collections, for schools, 89 Colors, Protective, M. A. Bigelow, 159, 262 Comstock, J. H. and A. B., " Butter- flies," M. A. Bigelow, 41 Comstock, A. B., Bee-Hive, 109; " Book of April and May Flowers," 133; n.-s. and Agriculture, 143; " How to Keep Bees," 166 Cornell Leaflets, M. A. Bigelow, 271 Coulter, J. M., Principles of n.-s., 57 ; Value of Names, 198 Coulter, S., Value and Aims of n.-s., 49 Country, for city people, 22,7 Course of n.-s. and geography, H. W. Fairbanks, 183 Criticisms of n.-s., 22 Croswell, T. R., Failures in School- Gardens, (>(> Davis, B. M., " School Gardens for California Schools," M. A. Bige- low, 2T2 Davison, A., Silk-worms, 156 Dearness, J., Teaching facts, 152; " Nature Study Course," M. A, Bigelow, 272 Department of Agriculture, Publica- tions, 42, 135 28o INDEX Dickerson, M. C, " Moths and Butter- flies," 1 66 DiGGiNS, I. G., Wild Flower Garden, ii8 Diseases of plants, 236 Dog, 134 Editorials, i, 3, 80, 2^:^ Elk, 172 English and n.-s., W. M. Heiney, 154 Facts in n.-s., J. Dearness, 152 Facts discovered by children, 163, 266 Fairbanks, H. W., n.-s. and Science, 4 ; Value and aims of n.-s., 52 ; Relation of geography to n.-s., 173 Fielde, a. M., Ant-nests, 37 ; Life of ants, 239 Flower Shows, A. B. Northrop, 104 Flowers, closed, 237 ; Wild, plea for, 220; Garden for, 218 Forest Service, 172 Forestry, Primer of, 171 ; Pamphlets on, 89, 171 Gardening for children, see School- Gardens and Home Gardens Garden for Wild Flowers, I. G. Dig- gins, 118 Game Protection, 238, 278 Geography, and n.-s., 5 ; Scope and relations, H. W. Fairbanks, 174, 180 Goff and Mayne, " Primer of Agri- culture," A, Watterson, 85 Goodrich, C. L., " First Book of Farming," M. A. Bigelow, 270 Grouse Drumming, 275 Grout, A. J., " Mosses with a Hand- Lens," F. E. L., 132; Value of names, 202 Gypsy Moth, 236, 277 GuYER, M. F., McMurry's " Special Method in Science," 268 Hall, W. S., Value of names, 201 Hampton, Leaflets, 43, 133 Hatch, L. A., Why many fail in n.-s., 97 Hays, W. M., n.-s. and agriculture, 141 Heiney, W. M., n.-s. and English, 154 Hemenway, H. D., Hartford Gar- dens, 29; Window gardens, 115; Value of names, 200 ; School- Garden notes, 218 High Schools and n.-s., M, A. Bige- low, 77 History and n.-s., 183 Holder, C. F., "Half Hours with Lower Animals," 230 Hodge, C. F., n.-s. and science, 6 ; Grouse drumming, 275 Home-Gardens, in Cleveland, 171 ; Worcester, 61 Hornaday, W. T., " American Natural History," M. A. Bigelow, 40 Illinois Leaflets, 43 Industries and n.-s., 142 Jackman, W. S., Value of names, 202 Lamborn, E. a., Methods of Sher- lock Holmes, 124 Lange, D. D., " How to Know Wild Birds," 230 Lessons in n.-s., loi Light perceiving in plants, 238 Lloyd, F. E., Grout's " Mosses," 132 Macbride, T. H., n.-s. and science, 9 ; Bailey's " Outlook to Nature, ' 227 Macdonald Institute, 20, 88 Mackay, a. H., n.-s. in Nova Scotia, 148 McMurry, F. M., Criticisms of n.-s., 22 McMurry, C. A., " Special Method in Science," M. F. Guyer, 268 Maple Sugar, 171 Massachusetts Leaflets, 43 Miall, L. C, Ready-made lessons, loi ; " House, Garden and Field," 165 Molds, F. L. Stevens, 76 Muldrew, W. H., 20, 48 MuNSON, J. P., Value of Names, 201 Names of natural objects, 198 Natural History, 15 Nature-Study, Popular, 14; and Sci- ence, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 14, 177; Ele- mentary School, I, 4, 5, 17; Defi- nitions of, 4, 5, 9, 12, 13, 17; Field of, I, 2; Materials independent of principles, 3 ; Not limited to plants and animals, 11, 19 ; not elementary science, 14; Principles of n.-s., 57; in High School, 77 ; Failures in, 97 ; in primary grades, 135 ; Nature Study or nature-study, 140 ; Various Interpretations of, 3; What is it? 176 New Zealand, n.-s., 22^ Northrop, A., Flower Shows, 104 Nova Scotia, n.-s., A. H. Mackay, 148 INDEX Oak, Lesson, 2;^ ; Oldest, 236 Object Teaching, 4 Observations, Original, 81, 128 Organization in Science, 14, 15 Osterhout, W. J. V^, " Experiments with Plants," A. Watterson, 164 Overton, F., and Hill, M. E., " Nature Study," Jean Broadhurst, 229 Outline of n.-s., H. W. Fairbanks, 183 Parsons, F. G., Children's School Farm, 255 Periodical Literature, A. Watterson, 45, 90, 136, 167, 272 Pets, Children's, 89 Philosophy of n.-s. (review), T. H. Machride, 227 Physical n.-s., 11, 18, J. F. Wood- hull; 133, 191 Plants that hide, 262 Plants without soil, food-tablets, E. F. BiGELOW, 69 Preparation of Teachers, 97, 233 Principles of n.-s., J. M. Coulter, 57 Scientific training, 56 Secondary school and n.-s., 5 Seeds, vitality of, 276 Seton, T., "Monarch," M. A. Bigelow, 86 Sherlock Holmes, methods in n.-s., E. A. Lamborn, 124 Silkworm, A. Davison, 156 Sinclair, S. B., Time for n.-s., 122 Stevens, F. L., n.-s. and science, 12; Lesson with molds, 76 ; n.-s. and agriculture, 148; Value of names, 200 Temperance physiology, 261 Thayer, E. R., Worcester gardens, 61 Thorn, cock-spur, 276 Time for n.-s., S. B. Sinclair, 122 Trees, books on, 47 ; in winter, 89, 251 ; key to forest, 171 ; of N. A., 131; planting, 22,6; see also Forestry Tuskegee leaflets, 90 Value of n.-s., 4, 6, 8, 9, 49, 52, 54, 57 Rhode Island leaflets, 89 Robison, C. H., " Field Studies Com- mon Plants," 231 Root, A. L, " A B C of Bee Culture," M. A. Bigelow, 130 Sargent, C. S., " Manual of Trees of N. A.," A. Watterson, 131 School Farm, 88 ; in New York City, 255 School-Gardens, as failures, 66, 120; at Hartford, 28; in Worcester, 61, 118, 120; in Philadelphia, 212; his- tory, 89; notes, 2x8; Report on, 232 ; in New York, 255 ; in Califor- nia, 272 Science, Definition of, 4, 10, 15; Re- lation to n.-s., 18, 177 Watterson, A., Periodical Literature. 45. 90, '^Z(>, ^^7, 272; Goff and Mayne's "Agriculture," 85 ; Sargent's "Trees of N. A.," 131; Oster- hout's " Experiments with Plants," 164 Weed, C. M., Trees in Winter, 251 ; Weed's " Bird Life Stories," A. N. Bigelow, 86 Weeds, 2:^7 Wilson, L. L. W., Value of names, 199 Window-Gardens, H. D. Hemenway, 115 Wood, D. R., Canary's Nest, 128 WooDHULL, Physical n.-s., 18 Zoology, 15 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW DEVOTED TO ALL PHASES OF NATURE-STUDY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Vol. I JANUARY, 1905 No. i INTRODUCTION In introducing this, the first number of The Nature-Study Review, it seems necessary to define the Hmits of the field which the journal will attempt to cover, because the term nature-study in the descriptive part of the title may be so variously understood at the present time. The different interpretations of nature-study for schools will be presented and discussed in this and later num- bers of the journal ; but here it may be said, without defense, that the aims and plans of the editorial committee are based upon an interpretation of nature-study in its literal and widest sense as including all phases, physical as well as biological, of studies of natural objects and processes in elementary schools. It is evident that from this general point of view nature-study includes all the " natural-science " studies of the lower school : the natural his- tory of plants and animals (nature-study in its common and most limited sense), school-gardening and the closely allied elementarv agriculture, elementary physical science, the physical side of geog- raphy, and physiology and hygiene with special reference to the human body. With all these phases of nature-study, and espe- cially with their relations to each other in elementary-school edu- cation considered as a whole, The Review will deal. Nature-study interpreted in such a wide sense must obviously draw its materials from the fields of the several sciences, and the working out of the problems must be through the united efforts of experts in the fields of biology, geography, physics and chemistry, agriculture, and education. Recognizing this need of cooperation from several points of view, it was decided as part of the initial plan for this journal that the editorial committee and the board 2 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 of advisers and collaborators should be representative of all the sciences whose fields are involved in elementary education. More- over, while nature-study is primarily an educational movement for the lower schools, it also afifects the science , work of the higher schools, and therefore should be considered from the combined viewpoints of professional educators with practical ac- quaintance with the problems of the elementary schools and of university men who are primarily interested in nature-study as a preliminary phase of science-teaching. For this reason represen- tatives of both schools and colleges are interested in the develop- ment of the new journal. Finally, the wide geographical distribu- tion of the nearly seventy members of the editorial board insures that the journal will be entirely independent of local interests and free to become representative of nature-study in all parts of Amer- ica, the center of the movement ; and it is hoped that those inter- ested in nature-study in all the States and in Canada will have a personal interest in the development of the journal as though it were the official organ of an American association of nature-study teachers. M. A. E. NATURE-STUDY AND ITS RELATION TO NATURAL SCIENCE A SYMPOSIUM BY H. W. FAIRBANKS, C. F. HODGE, T. H. MACBRIDE, F. L. STEVENS, and M. A. BIGELOW [Editorial Note. — The extensive correspondence connected with the founding of The Nature- Study Review showed that in the minds of representative men of science and education there is great variation in the interpretation of what nature-study is sup- posed to be or should be. In fact, there were found eminent pro- fessors who were so firmly convinced that nature-study is simply a dangerous fad that they counseled against attempting to give the subject recognition in a special journal. But all this diver- gence of opinion should be not in the least discouraging, for the various opinions are simply outgrowths of the diflferent local prac- tices in the teaching of nature-study. Thus far nature-study in the United States has been developed in more or less local centres where leaders have by personal contact established their individual ' NATURE-STUDY AND SCIENCE 3 schemes of nature-study. Hence it has come about that nature- study is understood to mean: (i) elementary agriculture; (2) simple object lessons on plants and animals ; (3) informal teaching about natural things seen by pupils, for the sake of developing interest and habits of observing; (4) serious elementary biology and physical science; (5) popular picnics in the woods; (6) senti- mental talks and reading about plants and animals ; (7) *' teaching children to love Nature " — these and all their possible combina- tions and probably still other points of view are found in the cur- rent interpretation and practice of nature-study in the United States. Such variation is not surprising, for the natural processes and materials with which nature-study in any form has to deal are extremely variable in their distribution, and therefore so far as facts are concerned the nature-study in one locality can not be the same as that in another. From a Maine forest to a wheat field in the Dakotas is a transition to quite a different world ; but in spite of the difference in materials available for study it seems reasonable to believe that educationally the study of the objects of the immediate environment ought to lead the Maine and the Dakota pupils to the same essential result. In other words, if nature-study is anything more than local manifestations of a widely distributed fad, there ought to be found some fundamental principles concerning whose educational and scientific value there will be general agreement. The science of biology is taught in the colleges on the basis of materials locally available, and yet there is such general understanding and agreement regarding the fundamental principles that in all essentials of a general biological education the students of the Australian colleges have equal ad- vantages with their contemporaries in England, Germany, and America. The situation with regard to nature-study is exactly parallel. There is need of agreement and uniformity concerning the fundamental principles by which the teaching about any par- ticular natural object or process may be guided. In search of such agreement it is necessary, first of all, that the conflicting views as to what nature-study is in education should be brought together for comparison and discussion. This will be attempted in The Nature-Study Review ; and we open the discussion of fundamental questions by presenting this month a series of brief papers which attempt to point out the differences between nature-study and natural science — two terms which are commonly regarded as quite synonymous.] 4 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 I BY HAROLD W. FAIRBANKS, PH.D. Berkeley, Cal. In attempting to frame a definition of nature-study I may be undertaking something which cannot be accompHshed to the satis- faction of every one, and yet all will agree, I think, that the sub- ject must be more sharply and clearly stated if we would have it productive of the most good in our schools. One has only to look over the literature of nature-study to see how varied are the standpoints of different teachers with reference to the subject. Some teachers hold that the chief object of nature-study or science, for they use the terms interchangeably, is the acquisition of facts, and consequently fill the course of study with a mass of materials which are to be studied in a scientific manner. Other teachers hold that the subject is valuable chiefly for its training of the mind and senses, and for its power to arouse an interest in and love for the world about us. With the first class the sub- ject-matter and its manner of presentation are all important, with the second class the subject-matter is considered immaterial as long as the desired training of the senses is brought about. The extremes of these two schools are far apart, and represent radi- cally different standpoints, but there are many intermediate views held. The term nature-stud}^, it seems to me, may be appropriately used for all that direct observation and study of natural phe- nomena which belongs within the province of the elementary school. Nature-study has to do with the raw materials of science, but it is not science as that term should be used. It is not even elementary science, if by science we mean the coordinating, ar- ranging, and systematizing of the facts of nature. Facts will be acquired but that is not the main object. Nature-study differs from the older system of " object teach- ing " in dealing more directly with phenomena in their natural re- lations, less with isolated " objects." Nature-study is less formal and the cultivation of language and expression is incidental. There must be some system in any properly arranged course of nature-study, but not an inflexible one. The teacher should be permitted to emphasize those aspects of nature with which he is most familiar, and the work should be further determined by the physical environment of the school. FAIRBANKS] NATURE-STUDY AND SCIENCE 5 For the first four years of school, that is, throughout the pri- mary period,, nature-study and geography are practically identical. Theoretically, however, we may distinguish '' home lore " from a geographic treatment of the home and its surroundings. Above the fourth grade nature-study and geography diverge in practice, although to make the most of both subjects, lessons in one should be arranged as far as possible with reference to lessons in the other. Nature-study calls for action on the part of the pupil. He should discover the meaning of facts for himself, and not ordi- narily go to the teacher or to books. His own experience should form the basis of what he acquires. There should be a gradual shifting of emphasis in nature-study throughout the elementary school. The distinction between na- ture-study and science is most marked in the lower grades. Here the emphasis is laid upon the side of interest, upon the training of the mind and senses, and the materials studied should be from the home environment. In the more advanced portion of the course, although the subject should still be developed from the side of interest, there must come an increasing use of the reason- ing powers, and a greater value attached to the choice and use of material. With the beginning of the secondary-school period method is more exact, there is a deeper inquiry into causes and relations, and we may be said to have reached the scientific study of nature. There is no break in the development of the powers of the child between the kindergarten and the college, and the lessons in nature-study, beginning with the home region, must be graded to suit the expanding capacities. Nature-study must blend into science study with no break between school periods. The pupil should come to the secondary school with a keen interest in the study and observation of natural phenomena, and if the work in the latter school is not too ambitious, he does not have to unlearn upon reaching the college a mass of pseudo-. science taught him when he was too immature to comprehend it properly. Nature-study should give primarily that training which the sav- age child acquires, but should carry it much farther. The savage child acquires an untechnical knowledge of wood-craft, of the habits and characteristics of the birds and animals, of the signs O THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 of Storm, and of the dangers which kirk about him. Experience sharpens his senses and gives him a working knowledge, which although not consciously reasoned out, or systematized in any way, yet serves him in time of need. The children of civilized races are shut away in too many in- stances from a free contact with nature ; their needs are so pro- vided for and dangers guarded against, that they grow up with undeveloped capacities and in almost total ignorance of the world of nature. How much more they would make of their surround- ings, and how much more these surroundings would heighten their interest and zest in life if they were able to appreciate them in even a very simple way. Nature-study should lead the child back to this natural intimacy with nature and to delight in her company. This cannot be done by feeding him upon courses of study made up of scientifically arranged facts, but by fitting him in a broad way through the exercise of his observational and reasoning powers so that he not only takes pleasure in the world around him but is able to use it more fully to his material advantage. II BY C. F. HODGE Clark University " I doubt not but ye shall have more ado to drive our dullest and laziest youth, our stocks and stubs from the infinite desire of such a happy nur- ture, than we have now to hale and drag our choicest and hopefullest wits to that asinine feast of sow-thistles and brambles which is commonly set before them, as all the food and entertainment of their tenderest age." — John Milton, "Tractate on Education," p. 8. There is a suggestive analogy between eating and learning. In the one process food is built into the bodily life, in the other truth is assimilated to the mental life. Both functions are equipped with a complicated set of organs and both require a certain amount of effort or work. '' De gustibtis non est disputandum " ; and still it is interesting to inquire why it is that eating or learn- ing some things is pleasurable and wholesome, while learning or eating something else may be distasteful and injurious. In gen- eral, if the physical appetite is sharp enough, the taking of food, however plain, is agreeable ; and, if food is not to be had, I sup- pose a Digger Indian may derive some satisfaction from eating HODGE] NATURE-STUDY AND SCIENCE 7 clay. In general, too, it is difficult to induce children to eat any- thing that is distinctly distasteful to them, and under conditions of normal health and appetite this is not necessary, their natural tastes and desires being our safest guide. We do not think of feeding non-nutritious substances for the sake of " strengthen- ing " the stomach ; although the experiment has been tried of giving a piece of sponge to a frog's stomach to see how the cells would react. It was found that the cells secreted vigorously but failed to recover their original condition as they did when sup- plied with food. I have little doubt that a similar calamity in the learning mechanism results from the effort to master subjects that do not prove to contain some nutriment for thought and the mental life. Science is a sort of military ration of a special few. Nature- study should be the daily bread of all alike. The attempt to force the army ration on the children of the country under the name of " elementary science," or often mistakenly called nature-study, has resulted in no end of misunderstanding and confusion. In attempting to answer the question, " What is nature-study as distinguished from elementary science," it must be understood that this discussion deals solely with the biological side: i. e., What is nature-study of animals and plants as distinguished from technical botany and zoology. Fortunately, there are others who will speak for the other phases of the problem. Our particular question thus becomes : What knowledge about animals and plants ought to constitute the course in nature-study for ele- mentary schools? It is easy to define botany and zoology as the scientific treat- ment of animals and plants in regard to structure^, arrangement, development and classification. All attempts to introduce these sciences into elementary instruction had proved failures as long ago as Charles Dickens wrote " Hard Times," and every effort to force them into the curriculum since that time has only served to heap up the evidence against them. Finally, to escape the odium of the Thomas Gradgrind-Mr. McChoakumchild regime the very name " elementary science " had to be dropped and the wholesome term '' nature-study " substituted ; and the gravest danger now confronting this new movement is that we forget the lessons of the past and persist in trying to teach children formal science adapted to maturer years. After acquaintance with a 8 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 number of common animals and plants has been attained the value of scientific methods may be appreciated. The greatest difficulty just now in making a clear distinction between nature-study and science in practical teaching is con- cerned with the purely scientific training of the teachers. They have had technical biology — or botany and zoology — either in college or in normal schools under college educated instructors. They have not been given the nature-study point of view ; and consequently, when they are called upon to give lessons on ani- mals and plants, they have nothing else and hence can teach only college science. This situation has drawn the dreariest train of absurdities in its wake to be found in our whole educational sys- tem— 'Messons"(?) in the classification of animals and plants the children have never seen or heard of, technical details of form and structure which, with the difficult terminology, are wholly meaningless and unrelated to any interests of either the children or the community. Nature-study, as I conceive it, is so natural and easy and so refreshing to teachers and pupils alike that a frequent reaction among teachers, I find, is : " Why, this is too good fun. You really do not call this work, do you ?" Well, call it what you please, but the more freedom, spontaneity and delight there is, for both teacher and pupils, the better nature-study it is. These are just the things that will develop genuine love of nature, one ounce of which is worth in life-value pounds of mere acquisition of facts. All I ask of nature-study is that it bring the child out at fourteen with a genuine and abiding love of nature ; and the thing that has stirred me to the quick in this whole subject is the hatred and the consequent abuse of nature which Gradgrind methods develop in the child. In order to develop love we need not only acquaintance but inti- macy, and intimacy requires time. Love is active. It is the great motive source of action in the world. Its best definition is : " the desire or passion to do good to the object loved." Hence, trans- lated into these terms, we should have as the end result of our nature-study the abiding desire to do good to the nature in which we live. But the good in nature is set of¥, bounded and defined by the evil. A child cannot love the plants in his garden without pulling the weeds and destroying the insects that would harm them. So with trees and birds and the whole list of nature inter- macbride] nature-study AND SCIENCE 9 ests. Since life itself is a struggle, wherever we raise a love we define a possible line of battle ; and we are all in the world to fight the good fight. Turn whichever way we will, it is only trifling to attempt to escape this conflict, and, hence, the line between the good and the evil in nature is essential in selecting the matter which we include in our course in nature-study. In other words, the good and the beautiful are realities upon which human life and interests have taken fixed and definite hold. Bring the child into acquaintance and intimacy with the proper things and his love flows out to them as naturally as water flows down hill. If we attempt to force upon him false relations and values, we have the futile task of trying to turn the stream up hill. Success or failure of the whole movement depends on the sub- ject-matter selected. If that is rich in universal human interest and value, we shall hear no more about " waste of time on fads " and '' new fangled notions," and nature will be accorded its right- ful place as a great source of nourishment for our educational life. Ill BY PROFESSOR THOMAS H. MACBRIDE State University of Iowa I am asked to discuss briefly the question, What is nature-study, and especially to point out the distinction^ if such exist, between nature-study and natural science as offered in the higher schools. The problem seems to me by no means diflicult, theoretically at least ; in practice science-teaching in elementary courses may, and probably should, include the nature-study idea as incidental. Nature-study is simply a sympathetic attempt to bring known truth concerning the natural world to the attention and compre- hension of those who would learn. All that is offered in nature- study to-day will be, of course, in accordance with the principles of art and science ; art, in so far as it pertains to the discussion of the beauty of outward form, science in all that pertains to exact detail, whether of form, history, or underlying relationship and origin. In other words, real nature-study is based upon real science; differing from the more formal presentation of scientific truth only in that it is less comprehensive, less complete, and in- deed holds in view a different immediate purpose. The purpose of the study of science is primarily the attainment of truth, of all lO THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 truth ; the purpose of nature-study is rather the development of sentiment or possibly the acquisition of some bit of expert infor- mation. If, for example, we study the deer as a matter of sci- ence, we seek to learn all about his structure, his relationships, genesis, habits, etc. ; as students of nature-study we may choose to ignore many of these things and think of the deer only as a beautiful living creature, having certain habits and relations to our parks and forests. But, it would not do to consider the deer as having horns like those of a cow, or as making in the forest foot-prints like those of a colt, or paths like the streets of a city. Nature-study when dealing with animals is real zoology ; it may not declare the entire body of known scientific truth in the par- ticular case, but at least it will in no particular contravene zoolog- ical fact. And so when dealing with plants ; nature-study is botany so far as it goes. It is not myth, it is not nonsense, nor childish legend, it is truth, scientifically ascertained and supported, truth, simply and clearly stated. There are, however, it would appear, very many people, even teachers, who so little appreciate the simple truth of science, as to esteem it dry and of itself uninteresting. The life-history of the barnacle does not appeal to such at all ; they much prefer the tale of the barnacle-goose. Such people will always prefer bar- nacle-goose stories, whether of the sixteenth century or of the twentieth, and for these real nature-study is out of the question. Unfortunately, such people still persist in believing themselves true nature-students and too often write volumes for the guidance of others. People who by actual experience know nothing about the natural world, by the aid of such books find themselves com- petent to teach nature-study, or in the language of the schedules, to undertake " the nature-work," and the blind go on leading the blind into a maze of fable and foolishness to which the history of education in recent times affords scarcely a parallel. Books of this sort are so numerous that they need not be here cited. All this kind of thing has served to bring the nature-study effort into disrepute, and many eminent men of science and of the schools look upon the whole matter as superficial, insincere and hence mischievous in the extreme. The remedy lies in the definition and encouragement of real nature-study, as against every fad and fashion whatsoever. Nature-study to be of any service at all, must concern itself primarily with the truth, whatever the ulti- macbride] nature-study AND SCIENCE I I mate purpose. Surely in all the splendid panorama of the living world there is enough to excite our intelligent interest; surely enough to arouse our warm sympathy with these forms of beauty and loveliness, albeit leading lowly lives, yet lives of contented- ness, happiness and purity, — surely in all this there is enough to waken the sympathy and interest of every intelligent, sentient soul, without metaphor, without artifice or stimulus of any sort. The greatest teacher of the world bade us consider the lily '' how it grows " ; who of his followers in all the 2,000 years can solve the problem? The simplest problems of nature are all about us, yet far-reaching to exhaust the most cunning artifice of our in- quiry ; but we heed them not. Look at the splendor of our autumn fields of corn ; where are the people in all these thousand schools that know the secrets of the corn ? Who knows the mean- ing of the sunflower, the aster, or how the chrysanthemum comes by its wealth of pearl and gold, and yet anon is purple? Who knows where the bobolink builds his nest, or why he is lost to-day in that swarthy swarm that marks the assembly of the blackbird clans all moving to the South ? Who knows the path of the wild- duck in his flight and why from year to year he courses back and forth, weaving the web of his destiny in the vaster mystery of terrestrial life? Who shall teach the farmers and sportsmen of our country that to shoot these birds in spring is destruction, a barbarism that even the savage Indians were unwilling to commit ? But why shall nature-study be limited to plants and animals alone? Among the text-books offered nowadays, there are some which are much more comprehensive ; they take up in simple way the phenomena of the inorganic world. This is to be commended. Why, for instance, should our people be almost universally ignor- ant of the simpler facts about the stars? Primitive men, men at least of whose attainments their descendants are not inclined to boast, long ago learned to read the shifting movements of the planets, but there are to-day millions of men in the United States who know not the first thing about the nightly heavens. Is there any reason why an agricultural people should not find nature- study in the processes which concern the making and distribution of the soils ? The simple truths of geology are everywhere patent, not in books, not in pictures, bat in fact; in the streets, in the field and garden, bv the roadside, written on scratched pebbles. 12 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 sculptured on all the hills. Why may not such facts constitute the theme of genuine nature-study, to the great and never-ceasing profit and advantage of by far the larger part of our population ? But how^ever all this may be, it still remains, that in all our nature-study w^e must take care that we so use the facts of nature that our children learn to judge wisely and discriminate truth from fancy and error, and any view or treatment of the natural world which is inconsistent with the known methods and facts of science will ever prove disastrous at the last, called by whatever name, nature-study or not, no matter how lofty our professed intentions, how noble the purpose we declare. IV BY PROFESSOR F. L. STEVENS, PH.D. North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts With the subject so broad in scope, so indefinite in administra- tion, so capable of variation, and withal so new, there is little wonder that nature-study is misunderstood by many ; that it is confounded with botany, zoology or geography on the one hand, or with agriculture and studies of the industries on the other. It is not surprising that attempts to define nature-study have failed, that written definitions are as numerous as are writers upon nature-study, and that conceptions of the subject are almost as many as are the teachers who attempt nature-study. The vast- ness of the subject leaves almost infinite liberty to the teacher in the selection of matter. Hundreds of elementary courses could be planned, yet not trespass upon one another. None of that elimination;, leading to mutual agreement as to the most desirable topics, has yet occurred, as it has with such sciences as chemistry and physics. These sciences, moreover, deal with fundamentals, and it is a necessary consequence that one elementary course in a given science is much like another in the same science. The principles to be taught are the same, the method chiefly varies. Nature-study on the other hand does not deal with funda- mentals. It concerns itself with details. Fundamentals are few ; details are infinite. One of the chief differences between science and nature-study rests upon these facts. They are fundamental and they will operate to retard, if not to prohibit forever, any rigidity in the nature-study outline. The great variation in sub- ject-matter gives almost limitless plasticity to the course. STEVENS] NATURE-STUDY AND SCIENCE 13 Another fundamental distinction between science and nature- study is that the latter as recognized by the great majority of its promoters is a study of natural objects, not books. Science may be a study of either books or natural objects. The essence of science is the subject-matter. The essence of nature-study is the method. While the subject-matter of nature-study varies almost endlessly, its method is its characteristic. Vary the method be- yond certain limits and it is no longer nature-study. Nature- study and science are in these attributes distinguishable. Nature-study is not science, it is none of the arts. It differs from both in motive. Science has for its end the acquiring and teaching of facts, laws, or principles ; an art to do or accomplish or construct. Nature-study does neither primarily. It may do both extensively though incidentally. The function of nature- study is to increase interest, to awaken the power of observation, and to open the eyes of the child so that he may see the beauties of nature that abound unrecognized about him. The difference in motive between the sciences or arts and nature-study is there- fore fundamental. The field of nature-study is broader than that of any other subject in the school curriculum. The motive of nature-study precludes dogmatic selection of any specific subject-matter from this field. That subject-matter is best which in the hands of a given teacher with a given school and environment will arouse wholesome abiding interest in nature. ' The value of systematic outlines is therefore less than in the case of the information subjects. Outlines are valuable for their suggestiveness chiefly. They may become stumbling blocks if misunderstood to be rigid guides. A subject so broad is capable of division and special suggestive nature-study courses may be devised to meet the needs of special conditions : agricultural for the farming sections, strongly flavored with rocks for the mining regions, abounding in marine topics for the seaboard, and painfully elementary for the tenement dweller. Nature-study is now in its embryonic condition. Its future development must see its differentiation ; but the spirit, method and motive must remain or it will either abort or degenerate into elementary science, a possibility which no enthusiastic lover of nature will admit. 14 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i. jan. 1905 V BY M. A. BIGELOW Teachers College, Columbia University The term nature-study has come into common use to designate (i) various phases of teaching about nature in common schools, and (2) popular study of natural history outside of schools by either children or adults. In both these cases the term has been commonly limited to the biological aspect of nature, and both the school and popular phases of nature-study are quite similar in the subject-matter and in the general aims and methods of study. We may, therefore, discuss nature-study for elementary schools with the understanding that so far as general principles are con- cerned the discussion will apply equally well to school or popular nature-study as these together are contrasted with natural science of the high schools and colleges. What should be the nature-study for the elementary school, and what its relation to natural-science study in the higher schools? As the term nature-study etymologically suggests and as current practice indicates, the subject for the lower school deals with the same groups of natural materials which give the basis to the natural-science work of the higher schools. Is this paral- lelism simply another duplication in our educational system? If so, such duplication requires strong defense. Or is the nature- study simply a translation of elementary science into " words of one syllable " in adaptation to the capacities of very young pupils ? Or is nature-study in some striking respect different from the natural sciences of the higher schools? These are fundamental questions which so far in the progress of the nature-study move- ment have not received the general attention which they deserve. In the beginning of our discussion we must clearly define what we understand by natural science in the strict use of the word science. According to Karl Pearson, in his '' Grammar of Sci- ence," " the classification of facts and the formation of absolute judgments upon the basis of this classification essentially sums up the aim and method of modern science. . . . The classification of facts, the recognition of their sequence and relative significance, is the function of science." Mivart, in his " Groundwork of Science," refers to science as " ordered and systematic knowl- edge." These agree essentially with the familiar, short and gen- 13IGEL0W] NATURE-STUDY AND SCIENCE 15 erally accepted definition that " science is organized knowledge," from which it follows that natural science is organized knowledge concerning natural objects and processes. Note that organiza- tion is the essence of this definition, as of those above. '' Science dififers from mere knowledge by being a knowledge both of facts, and of their relations to each other. The mere random, hap- hazard accumulation of facts, then, is not science ; and the per- ception and conception of their natural relations to each other, the comprehension of these relations under general laws, and the organization of facts and laws into one body, the parts of wdiich are seen to be subservient to each other, is Science." This clear and concise statement by the late Professor Joseph Payne, of Lon- don, in a lecture on '' True Foundation of Science-Teaching " (1872) will, I think, meet with the approval of all scientific men who use the word science in its strict sense, as distinguished from the loose popular usage of the word to mean simply any grouping of facts about natural objects and processes. The above definitions of science as organized knowledge may be well illustrated by a brief examination of the old-time natural history. This originally dealt with all phases of nature, but in the last century came to be commonly understood as limited to living nature — plants and animals. For our purposes let us briefly consider the animal side of natural history. Historians of science have written that the foundations of the science of zoology were laid in the latter half of the eighteenth century. This does not mean that in this century men first began to study and to collect facts about animals, for long before Aristotle many observers of animal life in its familiar forms accumulated much knowledge about animals, and Aristotle and later naturalists added great contributions. But all this mass of facts about ani- mals lacked, before the middle of the eighteenth century, that organization under principles and generalizations which is charac- teristic of the modern science of zoology. Zoology, then, is not simply the study of animals, as it is often loosely defined : but it is an organization of knowledge concerning animals, and the founding of the science in the eighteenth century was not so much due to discovery of numerous new facts as to comparison and organization of facts which had been accumulating throughout many centuries. And so we have come to distinguish between modern organized knowledge under zoology and the former un- I6 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 classified accumulations of facts about animals which were then known as natural history. This happens to be a very appropriate term, for the word *' history " here involves no idea of chronology, but was directly derived from the Greek title of Aristotle's work on animals in which connection the original " historia " meant records of investigation or information obtained by re- searches; from this natural history meant a record of studies of nature, and the phrase literally and by strict usage involved no idea of organization and generalization such as is understood in the modern natural sciences. Organization on the basis of classi- iication of facts and generalizations is, then, the one fundamental difference between the old natural history of animals and the new science which we know as zoology. I have used the history of the study of animals to illustrate the difference between the mere accumulation of facts about nature and the organization of the facts into science. In like manner we might find illustration in any other natural science ; as, for ex- ample, we might have traced the records of the old alchemists who built up a chemical natural history — a record of facts without the atomic theory and the other generalizations which have organ- ized the facts into the modern science of chemistry. Other illus- trations are unnecessary for our present purpose ; but the one point which must be emphasized is that the early studies of nature in all its phases were concerned chiefly with observing and accumulating facts because of man's interest in nature for its own sake, rather than for the sake of contributing to organized scien- tific knowledge for science's sake. This is the place where I wish to draw the distinction between general nature-study and natural science — two phases of the study of nature. Here is the difference : nature-study, which in its subject-matter is only a modern educational form of the old-time general natural history, deals with facts primarily for their own sake without particular regard to organization into a system ; on the contrary, modern natural science deals with facts primarily as they stand related to generalizations. Nature-study deals with the simple facts of nature as these are related to man's general interest in them ; but natural science deals with facts, both general and detailed, as they fit into one vast scheme of generalizations. In nature-study for elementary and popular education the gen- eral acquaintance with natural things is essential ; but in science BiGELow] NATURE-STUDY AND SCIENCE 1/ we want facts which we can correlate and classify with other facts and so add to or illustrate principles of the science. Or putting the whole matter in other words, nature-study appeals to us aesthetically and morally — we feel the value of acquaintance with natural objects and processes without perhaps being able to state the reason why; but natural science appeals to us intellectually and philosophically — we measure values of facts according to their relations in our system of knowledge. We see that the dif- ference is in the view-point, rather than in the materials ; but so far as studies of nature concern the earliest stages of education and popular information it is obvious that the difference is a fundamental one. We have answered our leading questions. The difference be- tween the nature-study of the elementary school and the natural science of the higher schools should not be simply one of amount of detail and simplicity of language, and true nature-study is quite different from elementary science in the strict sense, because na- ture-study should not deal with the introduction to formulated principles at which all high-school and college text-books of real elementary science aim directly. These considerations lead to the following summary by way of condensed definitions : Nature-study is primarily the simple observational study of common natural objects and processes for the sake of personal acquaintance with the things which appeal to human interest directly and independently of relations to or- ganized science. Natural-science study is the close analytical and synthetical study of natural objects and processes primarily for the sake of obtaining knowledge of the general principles w^hich constitute the foundations of modern sciences. Space here will not permit more than a statement of the propo- sition that all studies of natural objects and processes in the ele- mentary school should be nature-studies as defined in the discus- sion above, because true elementary science with its very founda- tion in classifications and generalizations is not adapted to pupils as young as those in our elementary schools. This is not at all a radical position, for the truth is that little real elementary science has been successfully presented below the second year of high schools^ most " sciences " in lower schools being simply so designated because the word is popularly misunderstood as mean- ing any study of nature. l8 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 I fail to see any sound foundation for distinction between nature-study and natural science except on the basis of general- izations, as above discussed. With regard to methods of study, it is generally agreed that in nature-study, as in natural science of the high schools and college, actual study of the natural objects and processes is the one sure basis for the teaching. Of course, there must be some limitations of the scientific method as applied to nature-study ; but, as will be pointed out later, these are of minor significance. And with regard to materials for study, it must be obvious that this offers no good ground for attempting to draw general boundary lines. In conclusion, it should be said that the above emphasis upon organization and generalizations as the fundamental distinction between nature-study and natural science must not be misunder- stood as meaning that the writer is taking a stand for unsys- tematic nature-study, or for nature-study which is utterly un- scientific. On the contrary, it seems certain that a very complete organization of the studies in the schools must soon be made in order to make nature-study most efficient in education. But such educational organization is quite independent of scientific or- ganization upon which modern sciences are founded. Systema- tized nature-study may well pave the way for true science study, but this is an incidental result. PHYSICAL NATURE-STUDY BY JOHN F. WOODHULL Teachers College, Columbia University No one supposes that nature comprises only plants and ani- mals, yet the term nature-study has been quite generally used in that exclusive sense. It is certain that botanical and zoological nature-study are much more common than physical nature-study. The reason for this probably lies not in the nature of the subject nor in the nature of children, but rather in the fact that persons interested in botany and zoology have been more zealous than the teachers of physics and chemistry in the performance of their duty toward the elementary-school pupils. Certain it is that children are greatly interested in mechanical toys, in wind-mills, water-wheels, air-guns, sail-boats, steam-en- wooDHULL] PHYSICAL NATURE-STUDY Iq gines, magnets, compasses, lightning, electric batteries, bells, motors, mirrors, prisms, magnifying glasses, whistles, harmonicas, all kinds of machinery and physical phenomena in general. Will any one undertake to say that children are more interested in plants and animals than in these, or that the realm of biology presents simpler facts and relations than the physical world? While the systematic study of physical phenomena belongs to a later period, children from ten to fourteen years of age have an inextinguishable interest in them and will study them whether we help them or not. Physical nature-study deals with facts and relations in the field of physics and chemistry which the children of elementary-school age need to know for intelligent and happy living. Possibly teachers of physics and chemistry have been too much hampered by their allegiance to the inductive method. They have scrupulously avoided the giving of information. They have even refused to make use of simple and direct means of illustration. Other departments give information freely and thereby secure a strong hold upon the pupils. Why should the department which has the most interesting and most valuable information, informa- tion which has a very practical bearing upon daily life, be so chary of it ? This was not the attitude of Faraday, Tyndall, Clerk Maxwell, and of many other leaders in the field of physical science — past and present. But among the teachers of physics and chemistry in the public schools of to-day there certainly is greater indifference to the needs of the elementary-school pupils than is shown by the teachers of other departments of knowledge. The Nature-Study Review will welcome contributions which will indicate that the foregoing statements are no longer true. Teachers and others are invited to make this journal the channel for communicating their ideas on physical nature-study — its methods, limitations, etc. 20 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 NATURE-STUDY AND ELEMENTARY AGRICULTURE IN CANADA [Editorial Note. — The following account of the new and very inter- esting movement in Canada has been based upon printed matter and other information supplied by Dean Muldrew of Macdonald Institute.] Beginning with the present school-year the nature-study move- ment in the rural schools of Canada will surely make great prog- ress, because the Macdonald Institute for teachers and the model rural schools will have their organizations complete and most of the buildings ready for work. Readers of Canadian periodicals of 1902 will remember that in that year Sir William C. Macdonald, of Montreal, authorized Professor James W. Robertson, Com- missioner of Agriculture for the Dominion of Canada, to lay before the Premier of the Province of Ontario an offer of assist- ance to carry out a plan, submitted at the same time, for the im- provement of education at rural schools ; and for the establishment of courses of instruction and training in domestic economy or domestic science, at the Ontario Agricultural College. This plan included assistance towards : ( i ) The establishment of a model consolidated rural school in Ontario and one in each of four other Provinces of the Dominion. (2) Providing travelling instruc- tors in nature-study for groups of rural schools in Ontario and other Provinces. (3) Providing courses of study and training in nature-study for teachers in rural schools. (4) Providing courses of instruction and training in domestic science for young women from country homes, and others. In order to give effect to parts 3 and 4 of the above plan, the sum of $175,000 was offered to the Province of Ontario, on cer- tain conditions, in January, 1902, and was accepted by Order-in- Coimcil of the Provincial Government in March of the same year. As a result of this magnificent gift there have been erected, as a department of the Ontario Agricultural College, at Guelph, the Macdonald Hall, a residence for women students, and the Mac- donald Institute, for the instruction of farmers' daughters and others in domestic science and domestic art, and for equipping teachers in nature-study, manual training, and home economics. By a liberal interpretation of the original agreement, the Province of Ontario undertakes the maintenance of these buildings, in per- petuity, and provides instruction in the courses suggested above, MULDREw] NATURE-STUDY IN CANADA 21 with considerable extensions that have been thought desirable in the various departments. Nature-study is now engaging the attention of educators at home and abroad, both as essential to a general education and as a preparation for intelligent agriculture. To equip Canadian teachers with the necessary knowledge and skill for making proper use of the simple materials furnished by nature is one of the aims of the Macdonald Institute, and courses in nature-study and school-gardening are ofifered to actual teachers as a prepara- tion for this important branch of education. Such courses are of two kinds, three months' courses and full-year courses. It was provided by the original agreement with Sir William C. Macdonald that, for a period of three years, five rural teachers from each of the older Provinces of the Dominion should be en- titled to a three months' course in nature-study without payment of fees. At the same time a fund, was provided from which such teachers will receive during the first year (1904-05) 5 cents per mile towards traveling expenses, and $25 to every approved teacher who has taken a full course to the satisfaction of the President and the Dean. It was expected that the Governments of the various Provinces would supplement this assistance by granting aid to worthy teachers wishing to take such a course. The expectation has been fully realized by the recent action of the various governments. In this way there have been offered for the term beginning September 13, 1904, the following scholarships for teachers of rural schools : Nova Scotia, 8 ; New Brunswick, 8 ; Prince Edward Island, 5 ; Quebec, 5 ; Ontario, 14, making a total of 40. Of this number about one-quarter will be ofifered to men receiving $75 each, and about three-quarters to women receiving $50 each, so that these teachers will receive from $75 to $100 each in addition to the mileage allowance for travelling expenses. Since there are no fees or other charges, except for board and lodging this will allow a large number of teachers to take advan- tage of this instruction without pecuniary cost to themselves. The appointments to these scholarships will be made by a com- mittee, acting with the Minister or Superintendent of Education in each of the Provinces concerned. Inquiries for further infor- mation, of applications for appointment, should be addressed to the Departments of Education of the respective provinces men- tioned above. 22 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 The one-term course will aim especially to prepare teachers to take up nature-study with their pupils, in connection with a school-garden and to deal with the simpler aspects of general nature-study. It is open to actual teachers ; except that those not appointed to scholarships as above will be required to pay the regular fee of $10. In some of the Provinces a special grant is paid by the Govern- ment to schools which take up work of this kind, under instruc- tors who are properly qualified. This bonus may be divided be- tween the teachers and the school. In such case it is expected that the successful completion of the above course will be accepted as the teacher's qualification, and it is probable that similar regu- lations will be adopted in all of the Provinces. A more advanced course of a similar nature and extending over a full college year is given to teachers who wish to qualify as specialists in this department. Only teachers holding permanent professional certificates are eligible for entrance. The aim is to provide instructors fitted to carry on the work of nature-study and school-gardens in a group of rural schools, in a large consoli- dated school, or in an agricultural high school. SOME RECENT CRITICISMS OF NATURE-STUDY From papers by Professor McMurry, of New York, and Professor Armstrong, of London In a paper on '' Advisable Omissions from the Elementary Cur- riculum, and the Basis for them" {Educational Review, 27: 478-493. May, 1904) Professor F. M. McMurry of Teachers College, Columbia University, points out that the present ele- mentary-school curriculum is so seriously overcrowded that omissions are demanded. An examination of the various school subjects leads him to the conclusion that not one can be spared from the curriculum ; and omissions, then, must be confined to particular topics and details. Six standards for selecting have in the past guided choice of subject-matter, namely : utility, the child's ability, the child's interest, truth for truth's sake, harmonious development of all faculties, and thoroughness. From a discussion of these Dr. Mc- mcmurry-armstrong] criticism OF NATURE-STUDY 23 Murry concludes that the following propositions should hold in the rejection of subject-matter: (i) Whatever cannot be shown to have a plain relation to some real need of life, whether it be sesthetic, ethical, or utilitarian in the narrower sense, must be dropped. (2) Whatever is not reasonably within the child's com- prehension, likewise. (3) Whatever is unlikely to appeal to his interest ; unless it is positively demanded for the first very weighty reason. (4) Whatever topics and details are so isolated or irrelevant that they fail to be a part of any series or chain of ideas, and therefore fail to be necessary for the appreciation of any large point. This standard, however, not to apply to the three R's and spelling. Applying these suggestions to various subjects in the schools, Dr. McMurry writes as follows with special reference to nature- study : '' In one of our best schools I was recently present while a second-grade class reached the conclusion that grasshoppers habitually lived in dry, sunny places, the children, when playing, having seen them there. They decided that the insect went under boards and rocks when it rained, and some related how they had fed some captive grasshoppers apple and water. '' I saw a fifth grade write out a description of a dead red oak leaf, the paper nearest me reading as follows : Size, 7^ inches long ; 4 inches widest part ; shape, somewhat oval — widest at top ; lobes, alternate, long pointed, 10 lobes on leaf; indentation, 10 indentations, rounded, deep, alternate; petiole, short, thick, dark brown, mid-vein thinner near top of leaf ; veins, alternate, thin, not many ; color, dark brown, near mid-vein. " What a mass of worthless matter in such instruction ! Much of it so valueless that there is no pretense of reviewing it next day ; it is even unnecessary for examinations. Here lies probably the greatest waste in our instruction. Where there is no careful selection of details, there is only an aggregation ; chaos rules there, and despair is constant, because the field can never be covered. " The teachers are not satisfied with such haphazard work, but it is difficult to bring about improvement. However, the diffi- culty lies not in method, but in the choice of matter, and I desire to make three recommendations in regard to the remedy. " In the first place, the subject-matter in those branches that easilv offer mere aggregations of facts, like history, geography, 24 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 and nature-study, should be brought under as few large headings as possible, just as a good lecturer is under obligations to present his thoughts under a few good points. . . . " In the second place, those subtopics should be selected in each branch of study that are the best types of large groups, and that thus give strategic positions in the field. . . . " In the third place, the leading questions that need to be answered under each type, or other topic, need to be clearly con- ceived in order to find a basis for selection of details. For in- stance, I have an extension class of y6 primary teachers — much above the average in ability — who agreed on 22 little points that they desired to teach on the cat, as a topic in nature-study. But until the principal questions that they had to answer in regard to the cat were known, to which these many facts might be the answers, their subject-matter was absolutely unorganized, and they were unprepared to give the instruction. Now our main in- terest in cats is as pets, and if we set out to learn ( i ) to what ex- tent cats can provide for themselves, and therefore (2) to what extent, and how, we should take care of them as our pets, we shall cover all that is necessary about them. And when we desire only the answers to these problems, we are given a standard that allows the omission of the number of teeth, the color of the hair, the length of the tail, and forty other facts that might consume time ; in short, that lets us know when we are done with the cat. So, if we set out to find out how grasshoppers sometimes prove injurious to man, and what means may be used to destroy them, we must discuss the food of the insect, his voracious appetite, his means of locomotion and quickness, his enemies (including parasites), his protection by mimicry^ and his stages of development; but we shall have no time to consider whether or not he knows enough to go under cover when it rains, provided he can find cover, or the fact that he can eat apples, since he will never get many apples to eat anyway. " Similarly, in geography, if we set out to learn what are the main industries that have sprung up in the Western States, with the causes, we shall need to consider the climate and topography, as the principal key to the situation, and then the mining, lumber- ing, agriculture, manufacturing, trade and manufacturing centers, etc., but we shall have no excuse for bounding all the States, learn- ing each capital and locating various capes, small towns, insignifi- mcmurry-armstrong] criticism OF NATURE-STUDY 2$ cant mountains, etc. Above all, we shall be unwilling to drop into the state-treatment of our theme, which means a mere aggregation of facts, dry enough to cause a healthy child to long to play hookey, not for the pleasures anticipated, but for the pains escaped. '' These three recommendations together call for such an organ- ization of subject-matter as has thus far been scarcely attempted. The thoroness customary — and probably justified — in the three R's and spelling, ignored unity of arrangement entirely ; indeed, was independent of it. But the thoroness proper to other studies presupposes organization, and is based upon it. This kind of thoroness requires that much attention be directed to relative values of perspective, and to sequence, just as in a story. " And such organization must be planned from the learner's point of view. Up to the present, however, the content of studies has been determined from the scientific point of view, so far as there was a point of view, and the love of ' truth for truth's sake ' has been so marked that one fact has seemed nearly as good as another ; hence the curriculum of the common school reveals little selection or pedagogical arrangement. Studies like geography and nature-study are little more than conglomerate masses of fact, showing our educational development to be still in the barbarous stage. Studies in the high school and college are little better. History, for example, is no better organized there than in the grades, and probably not so well. To be sure, in some subjects, there is a more highly developed classification, but it i? not the classification most appropriate to the learning mind, because the scientist's point of view is not that of the learner ; it is rather that of the philosopher, who has digested his field and then arranges it logically, not psychologically." In concluding his paper Dr. McMurry admits that his sug- gestions set a great task, one '' for the most advanced and ablest students of education, who are as well posted in subject-matter as in the principles of education itself. Even these have more than a life problem in such a task." But this should not keep any teacher or director of nature-study in any of its phases from making improvements by beginning to apply some of the above principles of selection. Probably very few experts in nature- study will seriously oppose Dr. McMurry's declaration that there is much useless nature-study teaching, and that the time has now 26 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 come for beginning to eliminate by organizing the materials. Such definite criticisms are bound to be helpful, whether we accept them in full or not. Another recent criticism of nature-study as now taught in the United States is by Professor Henry E. Amstrong, of London, who visited this country last year as a member of the Moseley Educational Commission. In the report of that commission (pub- lished in London, 1904) Professor Armstrong summarizes his observations on nature-study in many of our leading common schools by the statement that " The Nature-Study lessons I wit- nessed, when not specifically botanical or zoological and scientific in character, were eminently superficial and worthless." In an- other place Professor Armstrong writes concerning the nature- study work for rural schools : *' There can be no doubt that a pioneer work of great importance is being done, on which it will be possible to build in the future. It is not possible now to discuss in any proper way the method of teaching adopted. I desire to say everything in its favor, feeling as I do that the object in view is all important; but I am satisfied that the work lacks depth and that those engaged in it are not yet aware of the extent to which it is possible to introduce exact method into such studies; they need to be more fully acquainted with the practice of scientific method and with the art of discovery. It would be more nearly correct to speak of the movement as one for the promotion of Nature-love rather than as Nature-Study. At present it involves far too little real study and concentration of purpose ; which is unfortunate, as rural children particularly need training in exactness." Taking this criticism as a whole, many American educators who are quite familiar with our schools have expressed the opinion that the sweeping criticism '' eminently superficial and worthless " de- serves fuller explanation and discussion. Professor Armstrong promises that when the pressure of his work allows he will write for The Nature-Study Review a fuller discussion of nature- study as he has seen the teaching in the United States; and then we shall be able to consider whether we can get helpful sugges- tions from his criticisms. burkett] agriculture IN SOUTHERN SCHOOLS 2/ AGRICULTURE IN SOUTHERN SCHOOLS BY PROFESSOR C. W. BURKETT North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts It is never an easy task to introduce a new subject into the public-school curriculum. This is due in part to the want of training on the part of the teacher ; to an already crowded course of study ; and to a constant disinclination to change from the old way of doing things to the new, even if the latter is better. The teaching of agriculture in the public schools with us has gone the same way as other studies that have been added from time to time. However, there has been a strong public sentiment in favor of agriculture in the schools. This sentiment did not come at once, but it had been before the people for a long time, so when any concerted action was given results quickly followed. The feeling is especially strong in the Southern States that agri- culture shall be taught in the schools. This is evidenced by the fact that the legislatures of Virginia, Tennessee, North Caro- lina, South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana have each put agriculture on their required list of studies to bear the same importance as reading, writing, arithmetic, etc. And this has not been brought about by lobbying in the interest of text-book pub- lishers, nor because of the demand of colleges and teachers. It is the people's demand. Rural South sees the advantages that would follow if her people were trained somewhat along the lines they will take up in after life. She believes that it is just as im- portant that her young men and women know something about the soil as about the stars ; that they have some acquaintance with King Cotton as well as with King Richard ; that they know about some of the laws concerned with plant and animal growth as well as the laws that had to do with the greatness of Greece and Rome. So the teaching of agriculture in the schools is a demand of the times. It is to make life fuller and richer by making the farm better, and the farm home more responsive. Culture will come just the same. Education, while perhaps more practical, will nevertheless be just as broad and effective. Nor is agriculture to be taught in a desultory way. Teachers are carefully preparing themselves for the work. This is seen by the fact that during the past summer nearly six hundred teachers 28 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 elected agriculture and nature-study at the North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts. At the University of Tennes- see summer school over two hundred elected agriculture and nature-study; and at the Hampton (Va.) Normal and Agricultural Institute over five hundred teachers studied the same. It may be said that the same number of teachers were students in agri- culture at the various summer schools and teachers' institutes throughout the South. The importance of agriculture as a required study is intensified by giving the study a regular place in the daily school program. A text-book is used ; experiments are performed ; tramps to brooks, fields, and farms are made ; essays are written on agri- cultural subjects as a part of the regular work. Of course it will be seen that all this contributes to making the work both profitable and interesting to the pupil and teacher alike. While the work is new, the experiment now being made promises to be of great importance to the schools throughout the South. It is interesting parents in school work who have heretofore been un- interested in education. It is dignifying farm life, and it is destined to help the fields, and flocks, and herds of the South where the great wealth lies. SCHOOL-GARDENS [Editorial Note. — School-gardens have in recent years be- come a prominent and valuable part of the nature-study movement, and hence it is within the province of this journal to consider them as a phase of nature-study. It is not planned to publish a long series of descriptions of gardens which are in all essentials similar, and there will be no attempt at imitating the elaborate illustrated and detailed reports which are often published principally for local distribution. On the contrary, we will select for publication those original suggestions which seem to be applicable to any school-garden, and which will tend to encourage the develop- ment of new gardens. But we will not aim entirely at the prac- tical problem of making a garden which interests the pupils and their friends and looks attractive in photographs. So far as the mere practical side of gardening is concerned there are hundreds of successful school-gardens in the United States ; but in general hemenway] school-gardens 29 little effort is being made towards making the gardens of greatest educational value, except in the line of manual training. This latter alone is undoubtedly worth all the effort and is a sufficient justification for making school-gardens in connection with ele- mentary education ; but gardens are such splendid concentrations of natural objects, especially the living, that they surely have the possibilities of great educational value in discipline other than manual and in information which has practical, intellectual, aesthetic, and moral bearings. It is here, rather than in the prac- tical management, that we see the present problem concerning the school-garden movement ; and suggestions for making gardens most efficient educationally will be welcomed.] SCHOOL-GARDENS AT THE SCHOOL OF HORTICULTURE, HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT BY H. D. HEMENWAY Director of the School of Horticulture The School of Horticulture was established in the year 1900 as one of the Handicraft Schools of Hartford by the Rev. Francis Goodwin. Mr. Goodwin is the founder and largely the supporter of the Handicraft Schools, for which he donated over one hun- dred acres of land in the northwestern part of the city of Hart- ford. School-garden work is only one of the subjects taught at the School of Horticulture, although it has become most widely known on account of the success attained in this line of work. Probably no school-gardens in the country are conducted on more simple, more systematic and at the same time more scientific prin- ciples than those at this school. Nevertheless, it is possible to get more good from a garden connected with the public schools because there all the work can be correlated with other branches of study. The children come from the city in classes of about fifteen. They enter the class-room where each pupil receives a numbered note-book on which he writes his name and the name of the public school that he attends. In making application for a garden, the pupil gives his name, age, residence, parent's name and occupation, nationality, the public school he attends and the grade. On the 30 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [l, I, JAN. 1905 first page of the note-book the pupil marks his own attendance and keeps a weather report. The second page is reserved for a diagram of the garden. On the third page the lessons begin. They are copied from the blackboard or given from dictation in clear, concise language. Packages of seeds put up in coin en- velopes, just enough of a kind for a row, are suppHed the pupils, and they then pass with the instructor to the tool-room where each receives a numbered set of tools — a hoe, a rake, a line, and a weeder. With the note-books, seeds and tools the children pass through the observation plots to their gardens. An instructor is always present to show the young gardeners (many of whom Garden No- Name, SCHOOL OF HORTICULTURE. Hartford, Conn. ..Began. 1 1 MARCH APSn. HAT JTOE jtn,i AUOCST aarrsiiBBB OCTO.H* Date, " " Aneidaice, wort, Note Book. Deport.e,t, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ [E.— Excellent, a.— Good. o]F.-Fair. A —Absent. L— Late. have never had a hoe or a rake in their hands before) how to carry out the instructions given in the class-room. As soon as the work is finished, each child takes his tools to the tool-room, cleans and hangs them in their proper places, returns the note-book to the class-room and goes home. In this way discipline is reduced to a minimum because the quicker pupils are not kept idly about while the slower ones finish their work. The girls' gardens are the same as the boys ; but they come in separate classes. All work about the individual gardens is done by the pupils, who become owners and have all the products of their toil. The third and fourth year pupils assist some in staking out their own gardens and selecting the crops they are to grow. The fourth year pupils make all their own selections and original diagrams. The individual gardens have gradually increased in size until now they are ten by thirty feet for beginners, ten by forty feet for second year pupils, ten by sixty feet for third year pupils, and ten by eighty feet for fourth year pupils. They are situated on the hemenway] SCHOOL-GARDENS west side of a long main walk ten feet in width. Paths five feet wide lead from this walk between the rows of gardens, and there are walks three feet wide between each garden. Corn is planted on the north end of each garden so that the wider walk takes the shadow. On the east side of the main walk are arranged observa- tion plots in which are grown about one hundred herbaceous and annual flowers and one hundred and fifty dififerent kinds of other plants, including all the cereals, market garden crops, fibre plants, many of the legumes, forage crops, medical and pot herbs. 1 he buildings at tiie Hartford School of Horticuh The garden courses begin with the fourth year pupils in Jan- uary ; the third year pupils in February ; the second year pupils in March ; and the first year pupils about the first of May, according to the season. The work taken up by the advanced pupils is making hot-beds ; hot-bed mats of rye straw ; glazing, painting and repairing sash ; drawing original garden plans ; various methods of grafting, and making the grafting wax, cord and cloth ; physical analysis of soil ; study of soils and plant foods ; notes and practical work in taking cuttings, both hard and soft wood ; pruning ; spraying with insecticides and fungicides ; spad- 32 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [l, I, JAN. 1905 iiEMENWAY] SCHOOL-GARDENS 33 ing ; taking up and setting out trees and shrubs ; care of grounds — lawns and walks ; silk-worm culture ; mixing soil ; planting seeds ; potting and re-potting plants in the greenhouse and transplanting them in the garden. The advanced boys grow all the greenhouse plants for all the boys' gardens. Each year the pupils get some advanced work and a review of the work they have already had. The lessons are regularly once a week for each pupil. The time is so arranged that it does not interfere with public-school work in any way, lessons coming after school in spring and autumn. They continue every week during the summer. Pupils are per- mitted to come and work in their gardens at any time when the tools are not in use. Seeds, tools, note-books, etc., are furnished by the school, but a tuition fee of five dollars for the first year, seven dollars for the second year, ten dollars for the third year, and twelve dollars for the fourth year is charged the pupils. This sum, however, need not keep any worthy boy from having a garden, for one hun- dred hours' work for the school pays any boy's tuition, and many boys pay in this way. Several have found that in so doing they have not only paid for their garden, but have also fitted them- selves to take positions in the city. This past season several per- sons have applied to the school for boys to care for their gardens and lawns because the men they were hiring to do the work were unsatisfactory in that they did not know the difference between the weeds and plants. One of the second year pupils, so recom- mended by us, proved himself so satisfactory that the lady hiring him recommended him to several others until he had all his time engaged. At the end of the season his savings bank account was a great contrast to that of the boys in his school who had no garden and spent their time upon the street. But aside from the money value, the boy learned industry and acquired an interest in plants, which will mean much to him in future life. The yield of the garden should exceed the price of the tuition paid. It varies, of course, according to the manner in which the boy cares for it. One third-year garden (ten by sixty feet) yielded as follows :. thirteen and one-half quarts shell beans ; ten quarts wax beans, six quarts lima beans ; fifty beets ; six cabbages ; forty-four ears of corn ; eighteen roots of celery; forty-two heads of lettuce ; ten onions ; fifty-eight quarts Swiss chard ; six quarts peas ; one peck potatoes ; seventeen five-cent bunches of parsley ; 34 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 three hundred and fifty-nine radishes ; nine quarts spinach ; forty- three summer squash ; one hundred and thirty-five tomatoes ; thirty-eight turnips ; eleven quarts of Valentine beans ; and for flowers : three hundred and twenty-five nasturtiums ; one hun- dred and seventy-four pansies ; thirty-five snap-dragons ; one hun- dred and thirty-five stocks ; and six hundred and ninety verbenas. At the regular market price the vegetables were worth over fifteen dollars^ without taking into consideration the flowers at all. The crops are so arranged that after the fourth week in the garden there is something to take home after every lesson. Many of the boys leave some of their fiowers in the gardens so as to make them more attractive ; and these, of course, do not show on the total yields of the gardens. As soon as the pupils have finished planting their gardens, one or more of the common weeds is studied at each lesson — roots, stem, leaves, and, if possible, the flowers and seeds. The pupils are taught the name of the plant and its uses (if it has any), and the best time and method of killing it. In the same manner the cereals, garden crops, and fibre plants are studied. The children are taken through the observation plots frequently, and the value of the crop, its importance in the United States, and the products and bi-products are explained to them. All observation plots, both of vegetables and flowers, are plainly labeled with the common names so that the children may become familiar with them. The Latin names are also put on most of the labels of the flower plots. Insects are also studied and the children are taught how to treat the commoner ones as well as to know them in all of their stages of development. In 1904 more than one thousand silk- worms were grown. These were watched by all classes from the Qgg to the cocoon and the adult moth. The different stages of development were made use of in illustrating the different stages which some of the smaller insects pass through. Besides the children's gardens, there are classes in school- garden work for adults. The advanced class begins in the early part of the winter and the students are those who have already taken one year's course in school-garden work, or teachers of the New Britain State Normal School, or teachers in Hartford public schools. This class studies the physical condition of the soil, plant foods, seeds, testing seeds, collecting seeds, germination, grafting of all kinds, silk culture, drafting school-garden plans. hemenway] school-gardens 3 5 history of the different crops, hot-beds, fungi, etc. Each in- dividual has one garden, ten by thirty-five feet, to be cared for throughout the summer. While a great many plants grown at the school are not very common, an effort is made to have all classes become perfectly familiar with our common forms which can come into the daily life of every pupil. " The annual exhibit is for the young gardeners what the closing day was to the pupils in the old district schools." The Civic Club of the city of Hartford has from the beginning been much interested in the school and offers twenty-five dollars in prizes, which are awarded in the autumn when the exhibit is held. Prizes^ are offered for the best kept gardens in each of che classes, the awards being made by judges who visit the gardens frequently during the summer. There are also prizes for the produce that is grown in the boy's garden, the variety, quality, and arrangement at the exhibit being considered in awarding the prizes. There is also a hoeing contest open to all boys, prizes 36 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 for each class, and a spading contest open only to the third and fourth year boys. The exhibit is for the young gardeners what the closing day was to the pupils in the old district schools. Par- ents, teachers and friends are all invited to be present. An effort is made by every gardener to have his garden in perfect condition, and the rivalry in arranging the produce on the tables is keen. The hoeing and spading contests show visitors something of what the boys have learned in the methods of handling tools, while the gardens and produce show what they have accomplished in apply- ing these methods. There are also at the exhibit spinning wheels and a hand-loom in operation, and the different fibre plants grown at the school — jute, cotton, flax, ramie, and hemp — are all shown in their various stages of development and manufacture from the growing product to the finished cloth. This has been explained to the children ; although this is the only practical demonstration that they have the opportunity to see. There are also exhibits of the handicraft courses as well as the school-gardens, which aid in making the school-garden exhibit not only very attractive but of educational value. What is done at the School of Horticulture can be done in many schools. It may not be possible to have as large gardens, and often it will be necessary to secure land in the public parks or in vacant lots. The grafting work and potting can often be arranged in the basement or on a table in the schoolroom, and the " window- gar den'' is the teacher's greenhouse. In it can be grown all of the early vegetables and flowers started for the gardens outside, and greater interest and enthusiasm will develop if the children see the plants growing day by day. Of course, there must be an instructor who is equal to the task. While we may not be able to make many farmers and gar- deners, we may help to make much better men and women. It is hoped that we may check the flow of people to the city and turn some back again to the country. The school-garden creates a love for industry, a love for the country, for nature and things beautiful, and makes boys and girls stronger, more intelligent, nobler, truer men and women. fielde] ANT-NESTS 37 ANT-NESTS FOR THE SCHOOLROOM Suggestions from a paper by Adele M. Fielde, in Biological Bulletin The ants are, with perhaps the exception of bees, the most inter- esting insects which can easily be kept for daily observation^, and teachers will welcome recent improvements in methods of keeping them in captivity under conditions which they may be easily observed whenever desired. Most important of improved methods are those recently described in Biological Bulletin (Vol. 7, No. 4, Sept., 1904), by Adele M. Field, of New York, who seems to have brought near to perfection the ant nests which she first de- scribed in 1900. She now has ants which have lived, without earth, for three vears in health and contentment. m/////////my/^^^^^^ ( s ^' Food S food m^///////////////^^^^^^ Floor plans of 2- and 3-room ant-nests. The oblique shading represents the walls and S the sponge for moisture. The Fielde nests are made as follows : The foundation or floor of the nest is a pane of thick window glass (lo by 6 or 6 by 4 inches). This is laid on a sheet of thick, white blotting paper; but the paper is not fastened to the glass. Next, a wall is built up about one-fourth inch from the edge of the glass (see figure). This wall is made by cementing (with Diamond, Major's, or other crockery cement) to the floor plate four glass strips about one-half 3S THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [l, I, JAN. 1905 inch wide and double thick, and then upon these cement four other strips so that the wall will be at least one-fourth inch high. Avoid interstices where ants might hide or escape. The space enclosed by the glass wall is divided by one or two partitions double the width of the wall, but otherwise made the same way. The glass strips for these partitions are cut short so as to leave a passageway from room to room, and this passage is covered with a strip of thin celluloid or mica. After cement is well dried, the edge of the floor plate and the outside of walls are covered with opaque cloth or paper, using some liquid glue. These edges may be painted with black enamel, but cloth is said to wear better. msmmm*^. In the Fielde nests ants have lived for three years. There is a glass roof-pane for each room in the nest. The glass is thin ; extends to the middle of the partition and to the outer edges of the walls on which it rests ; prevents the exit of ants ; and permits observation of their behavior. The glass may be without color, or it may be a red or orange tint (such as photo- graphers use) that will partially exclude ultra-violet light. Ants perceive rays of light which are of short wave-length, and by use of a spectroscope, a glass roofing has been selected which renders the ants visible within the nest while it protects them from the light-rays which they instinctively shun. If such glass is used for roofing the nest, the ants will behave as if in darkness where they habitually live. The glass roof-panes rest upon a cushion of Turkish toweling which is glued to the top of the wall of the nest. This allows ventilation and prevents the escape of the ants. In its simplest fielde] ant-nests 39 form it may 1)e made by cutting a piece of toweling the size of the base of the nest and then cut holes the size of the inside of the rooms of the nest (see accompanying half-tone). An outer roofing of blotting-paper makes the interior of the nest wholly dark. The food-room should be light, as it represents the ant's outside world. When any room in the nest requires cleaning, it is covered with transparent glass, and then the ants withdraw from it with their young into a dark room, which may in its turn be made light. The food-room is dry, and in cool weather requires attention but once a fortnight. Sponge-cake merged in a little honey or molasses, banana, apple, mashed walnut, and the muscular parts and larvae of insects are among the favorite edibles. Food should be constantly attainable in the nest, but it should be introduced in tiny morsels that it may not by decomposing vitiate the air. Since moisture encourages the growth of molds, no water is put into the food-room. But ants drink often, and they require a humid atmosphere. All other rooms than that alloted to their food are made humid by laying a flake of sponge on the floor and keeping the sponge saturated with clean water dropped twice a week from a pipette. The sponges are kept clean by weekly washing and immersion in hot water. Sponges of fine tough texture render best service, as they ofifer no apertures where ants may conceal their eggs. The flake of sponge should be so thin as to permit the ants to pass between it and the glass roof-pane. The completed nest is less than half an inch in its interior height, and does not exceed three-fourths of an inch in its exterior height. A low-power lens is easily focused upon the ants within the nest. In order to stock a nest with an ant colony, wild nests are dug up and the ants captured are carried, along with some soil, in jars whose mouths are covered with gauze cloth. The ants and soil are then scattered over an " island " made by floating a board on water, or better, by grooving a channel around the edge of a thick board and filling this moat with water which temporarily confines the ants. A piece of glass covered by opaque paper is suspended slightly above the surface of the board. The ants soon gather their young underneath the darkened glass, and some of them may be easily scooped, without any soil, into the nest. Or a nest 40 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 may be placed on the " island " and the cover left open so that the ants may get into the darkened rooms. Instead of the " island " above described, some collectors make, on a table, a stockade of dry plaster of Paris which, like water, confines the ants until they collect beneath the darkened glass. In transporting the nest it is advisable to tie the covers with tapes or rubber bands. Miss Fielde has carried her nests on long railroad journeys, placing them on shelves in a portable wooden case. These improved ant-nests are so simple in construction and make keeping the insects so easy that they deserve a trial in schools, and this review is made because it seems probable that we have here a valuable suggestion for nature-study work. At a later time we hope to present some suggestions as to studies of ants which may be made by pupils in the school. BOOK REVIEWS American Natural History. By W. T. Hornaday, Director of the New York Zoological Park. N. Y., Scribner's Sons. 1904. Pp. 449 (about 7 by 10 inches), illustrated. $3.50. This new " foundation of useful knowledge of the higher ani- mals of North America " supplies a long-felt want for a one- volume work devoted to the natural history of American verte- brate animals. With the exception of some interesting foreign types (e. g., the kangaroo) introduced simply to complete sys- tematic surveys of groups, this is strictly a book of American backboned animals. One may examine the book in vain for de- scriptions of animals such as the lion, zebra, giraffe, tiger, and elephant, and other familiar representatives of the Old World ; but the woodchuck, bison, raccoon, opossum, moose, and the others of the long list of peculiar American types are in promi- nence, and concerning them there is the kind of information which the general reader requires of a reference work in natural history. This book is intended to give the teacher and general reader that information which will fill the " w^de and deep chasm " be- tween the scientific " zoology " of the colleges and universities and the nature-study books of the grammar grades. We infer that BOOK REVIEWS 4 1 the author would hmit high-school teaching to natural history ar- ranged on a foundation of classification, for he holds that " Sys- tem is the only master-key by which the doors of Animate Nature can be unlocked " — a statement with which a very large number of teachers will decidedly disagree. The book begins with the highest of the mammals and ends with the lowest of the fishes, an order of study which the author considers most interesting to beginners. The illustrations are excellent and very attractive. There are 227 original drawings, 116 photographs, and many maps and charts. By special arrange- ment with the publishers we are able to reprint in an advertising page a sample illustration, one which is also full of interest apart from its connection with the book. Summarizing its good points, the reviewer is led to say that the " American Natural History " is^ in all essential respects, an ex- cellent and intensely interesting book ; and it will surely fill an im- portant place in private, public and school libraries. It will long be the popular reading and reference book on American animals ; and it deserves a reign of popularity such as in the last half of the last century was given the books by the late J. G. Wood, the Eng- lish naturalist, who did more than any other to popularize animal natural history in Britain and wherever the English language is read. M. A. B. How to Know the Butterflies. By John Henry Comstock and Anna Botsford Comstock. N. Y., Appleton & Co. 1904. Pp.311 (5/4 by 8 in.), 45 colored plates and 50 figures in text. $2.25 net. This addition to the already long list of books on butterflies will be welcomed because it aims primarily to help the beginner in the study of these insects. This is done by means of excellent illustra- tions of common butterflies without, a confusing array of figures of foreign species, by giving brief but sufficiently full descriptions, and by recording only the more important facts about the life-his- tories. Part I of the book is a general account of relationships, struc- ture, metamorphosis, the life of butterflies, and methods of col- lecting. Part n deals with the classification of butterflies of ten prominent families and their leading sub-divisions. There are tables without technical terminology so that the beginner's way to the name of a family is a quite easy one ; and the descriptions 42 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 and illustrations in the chapters devoted to families will in most cases make the determination of the species a pleasurable task. The forty-five full-page plates are so life-like that even an ele- mentary pupil could easily identify most common butterflies. While the book is intended for use in the eastern half of the United States, the wide range of many species and the general chapters will make the book valuable in the far western states. The book seems to the reviewer to be just what is needed by the one who studies entomology for recreation and by the teacher who conducts lessons on butterflies in connection with nature- study of the schools. M. A. B. NOTES ON RECENT PAMPHLETS AND MAGAZINE ARTICLES Department of Agriculture Publications. Of interest to teach- ers of nature-study, particularly to those who deal with the agri- cultural phase, are many pamphlets issued by the U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture during the year 1904. The popular series of Farmers' Bulletins (free upon application to the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.) has been extended by adding Numbers 185 to 205. Of these the following are of most general interest: No. 185, '' Beautifying the Home Grounds," gives useful suggestions regarding the selection, planting, and cultivation of trees, shrubsy vines and herbaceous plants suitable for home grounds. No. 188, '' Weeds Used in Medicine," contains inter- esting information, with illustrations, concerning about 25 of our very common weeds. No. 191, "The Cotton Bollworm," will in- terest teachers in the South. No. 195, " Annual Flowering Plants," deals with the cultivation and uses of a large number of easily cultivated annuals. Its primary purpose is to aid in the home-gardening of the farmer, but it is of great value to all who are interested in school-gardens. No. 196, '' Usefulness of the American Toad," deals with the life-history, habits, food, enemies, and economic relations of this animal which is so interesting to nature-study classes. No. 198, '' Strawberries," deals with the story of the origin, the varieties, and the cultivation of the garden strawberry. No. 199 is on " Corn Growing." No. 200 deals with ' Turkeys : Standard Breeds and Management." NOTES ON LITERATURE 43 In addition to these new bulletins many earlier ones are again available as reprints. Pamphlets on Birds. The following pamphlets have been re- printed for free distribution by the U. S. Department of Agricul- ture : '' Meadow Lark and Baltimore Oriole " and " Four Com- mon Birds" (1895 Yearbook), ''Blue Jay" (1896 Yearbook), " Food of Nestling Birds " (1900), " Economic Value of the Bob- white " (1903). Hampton Nature-Study Leaflets. This useful series of leaflets has during this year been extended by the following: No. 13, " Arbor Day Suggestions," by Rossa B. Cooley ; No. 14, " Winged Pollen Carriers," by Mrs. Comstock ; and No. 15, " School Gar- dening." Also, for children there is a leaflet on " How to know the trees by their bark," by Julia Ellen Rogers. All these leaflets are well illustrated. It is announced that, owing to a decrease of funds, the free distribution of leaflets must cease and they will be sold at 25 cents per dozen to Southern teachers and 50 cents to subscribers elsewhere. Illinois Leaflets on Agriculture. No. 41 (Jan. 1904) in the series of agricultural leaflets for supplementary reading written by the professors of the College of Agriculture, University of Illinois, discusses in simple language the improvement of animals and plants by careful selection. This, like the earlier leaflets, con- sists of eight pages, 5^x7 inches. The leaflets may be obtained in lots of ten or more, assorted as desired, at one cent a copy, from the publisher, C. M. Parker, Taylorville, 111. Massachusetts Nature Leaflets. The State Board of Agricul- ture has during 1904 published the following new leaflets : No. 20, " Massachusetts Weeds," and No. 21, " Potato Rots," by Dr. Geo. E. Stone; Nos. 22-25, by C. H. Forbush, contain hints for outdoor bird study — No. 22, " How to Identify Birds," No. 23, " How to find Birds," No. 24, " How to Approach Birds," and No. 25, " How to Attract Birds." BOOKS RECEIVED (Many of those published during 1904 will receive more extended notice later) EDUCATIONAL Nature Study with Common Things. By Marion H. Carter. N. Y., American Book Co. 1904. Pp. 150. 60 cents. 44 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 How Nature Study Should be Taught. By E. F. Bigelow. N. Y., Hinds, Noble & Eldredge. 1904. Pp. 203, illustrated. $1.00. Nature-Study Lessons. By M. W. Crawford, William Scott, John Dearness, and W. H. Elliott. Introduction by E. F. Bigelow. N. Y., Hinds, Noble & Eldredge. 1904. Pp. 194. 75 cents. The Teaching of Biology in the Secondary School, By F. E. Lloyd (Botany) and M. A. Bigelow (Zoology). N. Y., Longmans, Green & Co. 1904. Pp. 490. $1.50. (Both parts discuss nature-study in its bearings on high-school biology. These sections on nature-study will be reviewed later.) Nature Study and the Child. By C. B. Scott. Boston, D. C. Heath & Co. 1901. Pp. 618. $1.50. (A discussion of aids and principles. Also contains lesson plans.) GARDENING AND AGRICULTURE First Principles of Agriculture. By E. S. Goff & D. D. Mayne. N. Y., American Book Co. 1904. Pp. 248, illustrated. 80 cents. The Garden Diary. By Rose Kingsley. N. Y., Pott & Co. 1904. 75 cents. (A page for each day of the year is headed with a poetical selection and the remainder is left blank for " Garden and Nature Notes.") ANIMAL NATURAL HISTORY American Natural History. By W. T. Hornaday. N. Y., Scribner's Sons. 1904. (Reviewed in this issue.) Our Big Game. By D. W. Huntington. N. Y., Scribner's Sons. 1904. Pp- 347^ illustrated. $2.00 net. BOOKS FOR PUPILS Animal Stories. Retold from St. Nicholas. Edited by Miss M. H. Carter. Vol. I, About Animals. Vol. H, Cat Stories. N. Y., Century Co. (Four more volumes are in press.) Monarch, the Big Bear. By Ernest Thompson Seton. N. Y., Scribner's Sons. 1904. Pp. 214, illustrated. The Tree-Dwellers, and The Early Cave Men. By Katherine Dopp. Chicago, Rand, McNally. (These books will be reviewed in connection with an article on the relation of primitive-life studies to nature-study.) Nature's Byways. By Nellie W. Ford. Boston, Silver, Burdett & Co. Eighth edition, 1903. 40 cents. (A reader for primary grades.) Outlines in Nature Study and History. By Annie G. Engell. Boston, Silver, Burdett & Co. 1900. Pp. 165. 48 cents. (Lesson plans for the primary school.) Bird Day. How to Prepare for it. By C. A. Babcock. Boston, Silver, Burdett & Co. 1901. Pp. 95. 50 cents. (An introduction to the study of birds.) Our Birds and Their Nestlings. By M. C. Walker. N. Y., American Book Co. 1904. Pp. 208, illustrated. 60 cents. PERIODICAL LITERATURE 45 GUIDE TO PERIODICAL LITERATURE a bibliography of the leading magazine articles of inter- est in connection with nature-study January to September, 1904 ARRANGED BY ADA WATTERSON Tutor in Biology, Teachers College, Columbia University [Editorial Note. — This first installment of an index to the periodical literature relating to nature-study begins the record of literature which appeared in the first eight months of the year 1904; and if space in the second number of this journal allows, there will be added to the list below the important titles under the following headings : '' Natural history of plants and animals," " Physical Nature-Study," '' Geographical Nature-Study," and '' Agricultural Nature-Study." It has not been attempted to make a complete bibliography, but rather to select those articles which appear to be most important and accessible in most public libraries. In the case of periodicals designed for local circulation, only articles of exceptional merit will be catalogued. The figures with black-face indicate the volume and those fol- lowing the : refer to the pages. The abbreviations of journal titles are those used in the general indexes to be found in libraries. Readers are requested to inform the compiler concerning any important omissions.] I. EDUCATIONAL AND GENERAL DISCUSSIONS OF NATURE- STUDY Bardwell, D. L. Nature-study. New York Teachers' ^Monographs, 6:6-11. June, 1904. (This number also contains outlines, by various authors, for nature-study in the different grades.) Bigelow, M. A. Outlines of work in nature-study in Horace ]\Iann School, in " The curriculum of the elementary school." Teachers College Record, 5 : 35. March, 1904. Broadhurst, Jean. Nature-study as a training for life. Plant World, 7 : 87-93. April, 1904. Burroughs, John. Literary treatment of nature. Atlantic, 94 : 38-43. July, 1904. 46 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 Burroughs, John. On humanizing the animals. Century, 67 : 773-80. March, 1904. Burroughs, John. True test of good nature literature. (Introduction to new edition of Nature Library.) Country Life in America, 6:51. May, 1904. Chapman, F. M. The case of W. J. Long. Science, 19 : 387. March 4, 1904. Davis, W. H. Natural and unnatural history. Science, 19 : 66y-ys- April 22, 1904. (Criticism of W. J. Long and other writers.) Eppens, E. H. Nature-study a la mode — a protest. Critic, 45 : 149. August, 1904. (Protest against modern scientific methods of studying nature.) Ganong, W. F. The writings of W. J. Long. Science, 19 : 623-26. April 15, 1904. Gilmore, Gertrude. The functions of nature-study and what it can do as a preparation for high-school biology. School Science, 4 : 136-38. June, 1904. Guillet, Cephas. A glimpse at a nature school. Ped. Sem., 9 : 91-99. March, 1904. (Curriculum based on a study of physiography.) Hoke, G. W. The centre of interest in nature-study. Ohio Educ. Monthly, 53 : 63-65. Feb., 1904. Latter, 0. H. Nature-study. School World (Eng.), 6:108-9. March, 1904. (Value in correlation of studies.) Long, W. J. Science, nature and criticism. Science, 19 : jGo-yGy. May 13, 1904. (Reply to critics.) McMurry, F. M. Advisable omissions from the elementary curriculum and the basis for them. Educ. Rev., 27 : 478-494. May, 1904. Ranger, W. E. Nature-study movement. Education, 24 : 501-3. April, 1904. Sharp, Dallas L. Our uplift through outdoor life. World's Work, 8 : 5043- July, 1904- Spectator. School flower show. Outlook, 77:211. May 28, 1904. Titchener, E. B. Nature-study. Amer. Jour, of Educ, 37 : 333-4. May, 1904. (Protest against "scientific nature-study" in the kindergarten.) Ward, H. Marshall. Nature-study. School World (Eng.), 6:205-8. June, 1904. Wheeler, Wm. M. Woodcock surgery. Science, 19 : 347. Feb. 26, 1904. (Criticism of W. J. Long.) Zueblin, Chas. The return to nature. Chaut., 39 : 257-66. July, 1904. DISCUSSIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE 4/ QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS This department will be devoted principally to the many little practical problems which are of interest to teachers of nature- study ; and all readers are invited to use this column freely. Ques- tions should be sent to the office of the managing editor. Some will be answered by members of the editorial board, while others must be referred to readers for answers in later issues. But in all cases the answers published are subject to discussion, correction, or addition by readers. We hope to have such supplementary answers within a month after the appearance of the first answer. The announcement of this department in the prospectus of this journal has already called forth the following questions : Question i. Books on Trees. "Kindly give a list of popular books dealing with trees." W. N., Chicago. Keeler's "Our Native Trees" (Scribners, N. Y. 1900. $2.00). Matthew's "Familiar trees and their Leaves" (Apple- ton, N. Y. New ed. 1903. 200 ill. $1.75). Lounsberry's "Guide to the Trees" (Stokes, N. Y. 1900. $2.50). New- hall's "Trees of Northeastern America" (Putnam, N. Y. 1890. $2.50) . Rogers' " Among Green Trees : a guide to acquaintance with familiar trees" (Mumford, Chicago. 1902. $3.00). Hunt- ington's "Studies of Trees in Winter" (Knight, Boston. 1902. $2.25). Question 2. Classification of Birds. " To what extent should classification of birds be presented in the bird-study of a fifth or sixth grade?" Referred to readers for answer. Question 3. School-Garden for Rural Schools. " How should a rural school-garden be conducted so as to interest the pupils ? It seems to me that the manual work involved in making gardens is such a familiar experience to country children that they will have little of the interest which novelty gives to the city children." F. H., Toledo, Ohio. Referred to readers who may have had experience. 48 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, i, jan. 1905 DISCUSSION AND CORRESPONDENCE [Editorial Note. — All articles in The Review are open to discussion, and readers are invited to send their contributions to' this department as soon as possible after the publication of the paper to w^hich reference is made. The editors must reserve the right to select and abridge if space is limited, and to modify criticisms which tend to be so personal or acrimonious as not to be helpful. The weak points of the nature-study movement de- serve free discussion, but in the spirit and form of good friendship for all persons who may represent opposing views.] NEWS NOTES [The help of all readers is needed in keeping The Review in touch with local developments of nature-study. Information regarding important changes in local movements, notes or manuscripts of papers read at local conventions, literature designed primarily for local circulation — these sug- gest the nature of information which will be useful to the editorial man- agers, especially to the writer of this page devoted to " News Notes."] Nature-Study Libraries. Hampton Institute has begun a system of traveling nature-study libraries for Southern teachers. A set of twelve books is loaned for a school term at a rental of fifty cents. New Nature-Study Society. North Carolina teachers of nature-study have recently completed the organization of a state association. The N. C. Nature-Study Society. The officers are : The State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Joyner, President, and Professor Stevens, of the Agricultural College, Secretary. A board of advisers, composed of specialists in each branch of science, will answer questions by teachers ; local branches will be formed in schools ; and a series of leaflets will be published. Migrating Birds. Of interest to students of birds, and, indeed, to all who are interested in birds, is the report that a law intended to prevent the killing of certain species of birds will probably be passed in Mexico. This will certainly protect some of our migrants which are wantonly de- stroyed in their winter homes. Death of Dr. Muldrew. We regret to announce the death of Dr. W. H. Muldrew, Dean of Macdonald Institute, the new Canadian school of nature-study which is referred to elsewhere in this issue. He was one of the collaborators named in the prospectus of this journal. Untrimmed Copies. Subscribers who prefer their copies of The Re- view with pages uncut should notify the managing editor before No. 2 is published March 20th. NATURE-STUDY COLLECTIONS SOR thirty years and over we have been studying the needs of teachers in all grades and branches of natural history. We have all along contended that the success of their work, whether in primary school or university, depended largely upon their putting coticrete actual objects into the hands of their pupils — a contention which the present nature-study movement has confirmed. Our best efforts have there- fore been directed unremittingly toward enabling teachers everywhere to secure and use the kind of material they most needed. In this we have, not worked blindly along theoretical lines, but have always had teachers of practical experi- ence in our service. The results are embodied in our series of school collections, the number and variety of which enables us to meet the most diverse needs and conditions. It is not our purpose to attempt a full account or even a list of these collections in this limited space. Our catalogues and circulars describe them fully and will be sent upon request. We merely ask whether you would not find some of the following things useful in your work. Do not say that you cannot afford them, or that your school is too small, or the pupils too young to appre- ciate them, but let us tell you more about them by letter, and perhaps your ob- stacles will disappear. Do you not need — A good collection of mhierals, good in quality, good in labelling and mount- ing, broad in scope, characteristic and representative .'' Especially if it illus- trated some standard textbook — e. g. , Dana's.-* Soine crystal inodels, of the six systems. -* A good collection of rocks, either lithological or stratigraphical, or best of all genetic, thus illustrating clearly how rocks are made? Would not, for ex- ample, a complete series of New York State rocks from tvpical localities, revised and up-to-date, be a grand thing for your work.? A collection of phenomenal geology, in line with the latest textbooks, illus- trating the work of the geological forces, mud-cracks, glacial striae, veins, faults, weathering and all the rest.-* A general collection of geology covering all the above divisions, illustrating, for example, Tarr's " Elementary Geology.'' " A little, light relief m ip in paper of the U. S., showing all the useful min- eral products by real specimens mounted directly upon it.'' A systematic collection of fossils, representing evenly all the formations and all the groups of animals and plants, by really choice and typical specimens.'* We established our reputation on such collections. A collection of North American archaeology^ illustrating by inexpensive but lifelike imitations, the life and customs of the American aborigine.'' A systematic collection of invertebrate animals, shells, corals, starfish, crabs, and all their cousins — ox z. set of small skeletofis oi the several classes of verte- brates, cat, fish, frog, bird, etc.'' A few typical mounted birds, to illustrate the physical characteristics of the more important families.'' A first-class biological collection, containing special mounted dissections of the important types, specimens in liquid, valuable dry mounts and models — in short, everything the teacher can want.'' (Send for our price list of biological supplies.) Anatomical models or human skeletons for class use? Or anything else in the line of natural history.'' If you would know more about these, send us your address on the back of a postal card. with the words " Nature-Study," — we will know what it means, and it will pay you to be on our mailing list We are here to help you. Remember that we are the pioneers in this work and that wr have the largest stock in the country to select from. Remember also that we have not only plaiined the collections for you, but have published descriptive catalogues to ac- company them that are virtually pocket text-books of the subject, and are actu- ally used as such in many places ! Ward's Natural Science Establishment,76-i04 College Ave., Rochester, n.y. SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS For Teachers of Botany and Nature-Study We now have ready two auxanometers (plant-growth recorders), Lloyd's model at ^2.00, and the HMSAC at ^2.50 ; lattice- work plant presses at 35 to 60 cents ; trans- parent specimen cases for life-histories, wood frame, separable, dust proof, no case is better, 45 cents and up, many sizes. Other simple apparatus ready and in preparation. LOWEST PRICES. SEND FOR CIRCULARS. "HOME-MADE" SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS CO., MECHANICSBURG, O. HELPS IN BOTANY The American Botanist is an illustrated monthly journal devoted to in- teresting facts about plants. It prints no technical articles, but treats of such subjects as color, fragrance, nectar, pollination, seed-dispersal, and the uses and habits of plants. Worth many times its price to any teacher interested in Botany. Subscription $1.00 a year ; sample for a two-cent stamp. Address, WILLARD N. CLUTE & CO., Binghamton, New York LEWIS' TREE-LEAF CHARTS Size 22 by 28 inches. Printed on good paper. Recommended by the best authori- ties in the country. Send for circular. Price of Single Number 50 Cts. each. Parts $1.40 each. The Ten numbers now printed for S4.50. Cash in advance. NOW READY. (These with a * as yet unprinted.) Part I.— THE OAKS. Forty-two species. Yio. i. Biennial Fruited Oaks. Black Oak and Allies. No. 2. Annual Frtiited Oaks. White Oaks and Allies. No. 3. Southern, Facile, Hardy For- eign, and examples of Fxtinct Oaks Part II.— THE NUT BEARERS. Numerous species. No. 4. The Chestnuts and Beeches. Amer- ican, Japanese and European Chestnuts. No. 5. The Walnuts. American, Japanese and Euro- pean species and varieties. No. 6. The Hickories. American species and varieties. Part III. — No. 7. The Willoivs and Poplars. Numerous species. No 8. The Birches, Elms and allies. No. 9. The Lindens ard allied families. Part IV. — *No. 10 The Magnolias and related trees. *No. 11. The Horse Chestnuts and al- lies. No 12. The Maples. (Printed in advance. ) For further information address the author, publisher and proprietor. GRACEANNA LEWIS, Media, Pennsylvania Do Elk Shed Their Hntlers?" An answer from the New York Zoological Park. I. March 21 2. April 8, 3. April 30. 4. May 15. From **The American Natural History." (See Review in this Journal.) Published by eHARLES SeRIBNER'S SONS, New York Copyright, igo4, by IV. T. Hornaday. ir]}ciii?3ix.irwmm M /»^HE NATURE LIBRARY is the II. only group of books on natural ^^ history that gives scientifically ac- curate information in simple, narrative style, and in a way that makes it equally available for studious reference or casual entertainment. It represents the first attempt made to illustrate a work of such magnitude and im- portance with direct photographic repro- ductions of living subjects of the animal, bird, fish, insect, and floral worlds in their native conditions. Additional to this pho- tographic literalness, the fidelity to nature has been greatly heightened by color plates, which are so perfectly treated that the ex- act tint or tone of the living original is pre- served through all the varieties of color. Thus the identification of any bird, flower, moth, etc., is easy, and its classification becomes a matter of the utmost simplicity, an advantage of inestimable value to the student or general lovei of nature hitherto perplexed and discouraged by old-fashioned so-called "keys. This is the first time a systematic effort has been made to bring the reader into an intimate knowledge, free from fanciful in- vention, of the home life of our brethren of the lower world. The difficulties of pho- tographing wild animals in their native en- vironments, birds on their nests, and timid cre?*^ures in their hidings, are sometimes insuperable ; but the success that rewarded the fatigues and hardships of the makers of The Nature Library, and which is at- tested throughout the pages of the ten beau- tiful volumes, makes this set of books not not only unrivaled, but absolutely unique in the field. Besides the 450 half-tones from photo- graphs taken especially for this work in all regions of the coimtry, and the 300 extra- ordinary and remarkably lifelike color plates, there are about 1,500 text cuts, such as are usually regarded as all- sufficient il- lustrations of theses on natural history. In the actual value of the pictorial mat- ter, the purchaser gets more than the price of the ten volumes : and yet the informa- tion, charmingly, familiarly presented in the 4,000 pages, is a treasury from which the most careless reader may extract a sort of riches he would not willingly lose again. But The Nature Library is not hav- ing careless readers. One point more fre- quently emphasized than any other by those who write in voluntary acknowledgment of their satisfaction with the purchase is the *' entertaining " quality of the books. Entertaining they most unquestionably are — entertaining to old and young alike ; and that was the great object aimed at by the makers of The Nature Library who believe that the secret of all educa- tion is to make instruction entertain- ing and inspiring. We believe noth- ing better suited to the double purpose than these ten hand - some and beautifully illus- trated books has been of- / S^ ^'?'S'-J''-^ fered to the t^"1^i,v in / ^> many years. covrnmr an ■INAAERICA DOVBLEDATPAGEJiCOl - -133135»137 E.16TRST.- NEW YORK m [ContjfUied frorfi the second cover pa <^e.) G. W. Carver, Director of Agriculture, Tuskegee Institute, Alabama. Elizabeth Carse, Principal of Charlton School, New York City. F. M. Chapman, Curator of Birds, American Museum of Natural History, New York. Bertha Chapman, Superintendent of Nature-Study, Oakland Cal. F. L. Charles, I'rofessor of Biology, DeKalb (ill.) Normal School. H. L Clapp, Principal of Putnam School, Roxbury, Mass. W. B. Coleman, professor of Biology, Sam Houston Institute, Huntsville.Tex. B. P. Colton, Professor of Biology, Illinois State Normal University. Anna B. Comstock, Lecturer, Cornell University, College of Agriculture. E. G. CONKLIN, Director of Zoological Department, University of Penna. J. M. Coulter, Professor of Botany, University of Chicago. Stanley Coulter, Professor of Biology, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind. T. R. Croswell, Supervisor of Training School, Los Angeles, Cal. R. E. Dodge, Professor of Geography, Teachers College, Columbia University. Mrs. F. N. Doubleday (Neltje Blanchan), Author and Lecturer, New York City. W. F. Ganong, Professor of Botany, Smith College, Northampton, Mass. W. S. Hall, Professor of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago. W. Hallock, Professor of Physics, Columbia University. W. M. Hays, Director of Agriculture, University of Minnesota. H, D. Hemenway, Director of Hartford (Conn.) School of Horticulture. E. H. HoLDEN, Formerly Director of Lick Observatory, Librarian of West Point Military Academy. W. G. HoRMELL, Professor of Physics,OhioWesleyan University, Delaware, O. W. T. HoRNADAY, Director of New York Zoological Park. W. S. Jackman, Principal of Elementary School, University of Chicago. O. P. Jenkins, Professor of Zoology, Stanford University, Cal. V. L. Kellogg, Professor of Entomology, Stanford University. D. Lange, Supervisor of Nature-Study, St. Paul (Minn.) schools. F. E. Lloyd, Adjunct Professor of Biology, Teachers College, Columbia University. W. A. Locy, Professor of Zoology, Northwestern L-niversity, Evanston, 111. T. H. Macbride, Professor of Botany, University of Iowa, Iowa City. Alice G. McCloskey, Instructor, College of Agriculture, Cornell University. A. H. MacKay, Superintendent of Education, Nova Scotia, Halifax JN'. S. Chas. a. McMurry, Professor of Pedagogy, DeKalb (111.) Normal School. F. M. McMurry, Professor of Elementary Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. J. P. Munson, Professor of Biology, Washington State Normal School, Ellensburg, Wash. Fred. Mutchler, Institute Worker and Assistant in Biology, Clark University. J. G. Needham, Professor of Biology, Lake Forest University, Lake Forest, 111. H. Newman, Principal of PubHc School 33, New York City. J. E. Peabody, Instructor in Biology, Morris High School, New York City. Clara L. Russell, New York State Normal College, Albany, N. Y. P. W. Search, Lecturer, Worcester, Mass, S. B. Sinclair, Vice- Principal of Normal School, Ottawa, Canada. J. W. Spencer, Supervisor of Bureau of Nature-Study, Cornell University. W. E. Stark, Principal of High School, Ethical Culture School, New York. F. L. Stevens, Irofessor of Biology in North Carolina College of Agriculture, Ada Watterson, Tutor in Biology, Teachers College, Columbia University. C M. Weed, Professor in New Hampshire College of Agriculture, Durham. Mrb. L. L. Wilson, Director of Biology, I'hiladelphia Normal College. NATURAL SCIENCE APPARATUS AND PREPARATIONS NATURAL HISTORY SPECIMENS for Exhibition^ Demonstration and Dissection. Skeletons, Models, Charts, Aquaria, Mounted Birds, Museum Glassware ENTOMOLOGICAL SUPPLIES AND INSECTS Special Insect Catalogue. EVERYTHING NEEDED BY NATURALISTS Illustrated Catalogues and Special Estimates on Application. THE KNY-SCHEERER CO. Dept. of Natural Science, 225-233 Fourth Ave. G. LAGAI, Ph.D. NEW YORK, N. Y. (Mention this Journal.) THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW Vol. I, No. 2 March, 1905 DEVOTED TO ALL PHASES OF NATURE-STUDY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CONTENTS PAGE Fducational Values and Aims of Nature-Study 49 Stanley Coulte:r, Harold W. Fairbanks, Maurice A. Bigelow. Principles of Nature-Study. John M. Coulter 57 Children's Gardens at Worcester, Mass. Illustrated. Edna R. Thayer .... 61 Why Some School-Gardens are Failures. T. R. Crosvvell 66 Ch' mical Tablets for Feeding Plants Growing W^ithout Soil. Illustrated ... 69 Edward F. Bigelow. A Nature-Study Lesson with the Molds. F. L. Stevens 76 Nature-Study in High Schools. M. A. Bigelow '. 77 Editorials : Collaborators of the Review — Articles by those who both think and do — Original Observations 80 Book Reviews: Animal Stories from St. Nicholas— How Nature-Study should be taught — First Principles of Agriculture — Bird Life Stories 81 Notes on Recent Pamphlets and Magazine Articles 87 Guide to Periodical Literature J I. i\DA Watterson 90 News Notes 96 $1.00 a Volume (6 Nos.) Published by M. A. BIGELOW, Managing Editor 41 North Queen Street, Lancaster, Pa. AND 525 "West i2oth Street, New York City 20 Cents a Copy Application made for entry as second-class matter at the Lancaster, Pa., Post Office. Published bi-monthly. Copyright y iQOj, by M A. Bigeloiv. THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW DEVOTED TO ALt. PHASES OV NATCTRB-STUDY IX ELEItf EI^TAR'X' SCHOOI^S Six numbers per volume (year). Subscription price, $i.oo; single copies 20 cents. Sample copy (no special selection of number) for 6 cents in stamps. Postage to addresses outside of the United States, Canada and Mexico, 20 cents per volume extra. Discounts of 20 per cent, for five or more copies to one address. Rates for clubs and commissions to agents given on application. Remittances may be made by express or post-office orders or bank paper payable at par in New York. The New York banks charge for collecting checks on banks outside of the city, except those in Bos- ton, Philadelphia, and a few other places near New York. Receipts are sent for all remittances. Subscriptions and other business communications maybe ad(hes.-ed to THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW, 41 N. Queen St., Lancaster, Pa., which is the office^ of publication ; or Teachers College, 525 West I20th St., New York City, which is the editorial office. All manu- scripts, books and papers for notice or review, and other communications of editorial interest should be addressed to the New York c ffice only. EDITORIAL COMMITTEE L. H. Bailey, Dean of College of Agriculture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. H. W. Fairbanks, Geologist and Author of Text-books of Geography, Berkeley, Cal. C. F. Hodge, Professor of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, Mass. J. F. WooDHULL, Professor of Physical Science, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City. M. A. BiGELOW, Adjunct Professor of Biology, Teachers College, Columbia University, Managing Editor. ADVISERS AND COLLABORATORS This list includes only names of those ivho in advance of the first publication promised szipport to The Review. Many others have since given their co-operation. See editorial in No. 2, March. FROM GREAT BRITAIN L. C. Mi ALL, Professor of Biology, Yorkshire College. C. L. Morgan, Principal of University College, Bristol, England. J. A. Thomson, Professor of Natural History, University of Aberdeen. FROM UNITED STATES AND CANADA E. A. Andrews, Professor of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. D. L. Bardwell, District Superintendent of Schools, New York City. C. E. Bessey, Professor of Botany, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb, E. F. BiGELOW, Departmental Editor of St. Nicholas and Lecturer, Stamford, Conn. A, C. BoYDEN, Vice-Principal of Bridgewater (Mass.) Normal School. E. C. Branson, Principal of State Normal School, Athens, Ga. Bertha M. Brown, Department of Biology, Hyannis(Mass.) Normal School. ( Continued on the third cover pa^^c. ) THE XATUBE-STUDY BEVIEW CONTENTS OF No. i, JANUARY, 1905 Introduction, M. A. B. Nature-Study and Natural Science — A Symposium, H. W, P^AiRBANKS, C. F. Hodge, T. H. Macbridk, V. L. Stkvens, M. A. BuiELOVv. Physical Nature-Study, John F. Woodhull. Nature-Study and Elementary Agricul- ture in Canada, W, H. Muldrew. Some Recent Criticisms of Nature-Study, F. M. McMuRRY and H. E. Armstrong. Agriculture in Southern Schools, C. W. Burkf:tt. School-Gardens at Hartford School of Horticulture, H. U. Hi-:mi-:\\vav. Ant-Nests for the School, Adele M. Field. Book Reviews and Notes on Recent Literature. Guide to Periodical Literature, Ada Watterson.. A JOURNAL FOR TEACHERS The success of The Review must depend upon its usefulness to teachers who are engaged in putting to practical test the latest ideas concerning the teaching of nature-study. For this reason the editors want to give particular attention to the practical side of the teacher's work, and suggestions from any source will be grate- fully received and carefully considered. MONTHLY PUBLICATION Numerous friends of The Review point out the importance of monthly pubH- cation during the school year, September to June inclusive. The desirability of this has been recognized from the very beginning of the plans for the journal ; but the advice of persons of experience has been that a bi-monthly should be tried the first year, and if that is well supported then change from six to eight or nine issues per year. The outlook for monthly publication next year is now hopeful. But we must have many more subscribers, and we ask present subscribers to co-operate with us in reaching teachers who have not yet learned that this special journal is being pub- lished. Please send us the names of those who may be interested, and rriention The Rp:vie:w to your friends. TRIAL SUBSCRIPTIONS To those who have not yet been persuaded that they need The Review regu- larly, a special trial subscription price of thirty cents for one half year is offered. . CLUB RATES Special rates for associations and classes of teachers will be quoted to those in- terested. A great reduction for 5, 10, 20 or more subscriptions in one order. COMMISSIONS FOR NEW SUBSCRIPTIONS Any present subscriber sending two new subscriptions for one year will have his own subscription extended one year. Cash commissions will be quoted to agents w^ho are interested. We want ener- getic agents in every locality where nature-study is prominent in the schools. THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW PLANS FOR FUTURE NUMBERS As stated in the prospectus and as illustrated in this and the preceding number, it will be the aim to make each issue present a wide range of material dealing with all phases of nature-study. Beginning in the next nuriiber, a series of articles will discuss the relations of the various phases of nature-study — biological, physical, geographical, agricultural — to each other and to related subjects in the elementary-school curriculum. Papers in these lines have been promised by collaborators and others. The following papers are expected to introduce the subjects for discussion: Professor Dodge, of Teachers College, Columbia University, and Dr. Fairbanks, of the Editorial Committee, on " Geography and its relation to Nature-Study " ; Professor W. S. Hall, of Northwestern University, and M. A. Bigelow, on "Physiology and its relation to Nature-Study"; Prin- cipal Baldwin, of Hyannis (Mass.) State Normal, on "Nature-Study and Manual Training " ; Dr. Carrington, State Superintendent of Schools of Missouri, on " Agriculture and Nature-Study," and other papers on this subject by Professors Bailey, Burkett, Hays, Stevens, and Mrs. Comstock; Dr. Katherine Dopp, of Chicago, on '' Nature-Study and Primitive-Life Studies " ; and we hope to have papers on " Nature-Study and Elementary Art." Many papers outside of the above series are in preparation ; we have space to mention only a few : Mrs. Comstock, on " Attitude of Teachers in Teaching about Life and Death," and on " Books in Nature-Study " ; Pro- fessor Hodge, on " The Human Interest in Nature-Study " and " Bird Studies " ; Professor Bessey, on " Nature-Study as it was taught thirty years ago"; Professor Charles, of De Kalb, 111., on "The Spirit of Nature- Study " and " The Nature Calendar " ; Dr. E. F. Bigelow, of St. Nicholas, on various phases of out-of-door nature-study and practical studies with plants and animals ; Professor Woodhull, on " Lessons in Physical Nature- Study " ; Professor Croswell, of Los Angeles, on " Why some School- Gardens are Failures " ; Miss A. Blood, of New York City, on " Difficulties of Nature-Study in City Schools ",; Miss Gallup, of the Children's Museum, Brooklyn, on the work of that institution as suggesting plans for school collections ; Miss Laura Underbill, of Horace Mann School, New York City, on " Bird Study in a Fifth Grade " ; a series of illustrated papers on " School-Gardens " ; another on " Lesson Plans " by several writers ; and " Correlation between Physical and Biological Nature-Study " by M. A. Bigelow. In addition to these papers, we have promises from a large num- ber of educators and men of science who have contributed to scientific education that their future addresses and other papers bearing on nature- study will be contributed to The Review. We have suggested only the leading plans for the near future. It must be obvious that The Review will be indispensable to all who are inter- ested in nature-study and the elerpentary sciences. Since the above was set in type many voluntary suggestions and answers to correspondence have more than doubled the list of strong and interest- ing papers which will be published as rapidly as space permits. THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW DEVOTED TO ALL PHASES OF NATURE-STUDY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Vol. I MARCH, 1905 No. 2 EDUCATIONAL VALUES AND AIMS OF NATURE-STUDY A SYMPOSIUM BY S. COULTER, H. W. FAIRBANKS and M. A. BIGELOW [Editorial Note. — The discussion of the relations of nature-study and natural science opened by the symposium in No. i of this journal will doubtless be added to in later papers with other titles or by voluntary con- tributions to the pages devoted to " Discussions and Correspondence." So far as the discussions already published are concerned, it appears that the writers are practically agreed that: (i) nature-study and natural science, viewed from the standpoint of education, should be regarded as decidedly different in that true nature-study lacks the characteristic organization of science; (2) nature-study so distinguished from science is the proper work of the elementary and ungraded schools; and (3) nature-study should be understood as dealing with all phases of nature, physical as well as biological. But although it is advocated that nature-study should be without strict scientific organization, there are many suggestions in the first symposium that the writers are looking for some satisfactory educational organization for nature-study. In search of such organization we naturally inquire first into the educational values of our subject and from these formulate the aims or guiding principles for the teaching. Here we are face to face with another fundamental problem ; and, following the plan of the earlier sym- posium, the consideration of the questions involved is from the points of view of several writers. Several contributions to this symposium arrived too late for this issue and will be published later.] BY PROFESSOR STANLEY COULTER Purdue University It is conceded, in view of the already crowded curricula of the schools and the excessive work laid upon the teachers, that no new subject should be introduced unless it is clearly shown to be necessary to secure the symmetrical intellectual development of so THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 the child. If nature-study fails to aid in bringing about this result, it has no position in the schools which is at all defensible. It is essential, therefore, that there should be a clear-cut con- ception of the significance of the subject from this viewpoint. Its peculiar function- is to develop the perceptive powers, and through this development bring the' child into an intimate and sympathetic relationship with his surroi^i dings. This central thought, the real educational purpose of nature-study, has too often been lost in the effort to make the subject the vehicle for carrying information bearing upon an almost endless variety of natural phenomena. In no other subject, perhaps, is there such need to keep constantly in mind the real en*d in view ; to recognize the fact that it is not necessary to know plants and animals, but that it is through these to develop the perceptive powers so as to bring the child into a broader, a closer and a more sympathetic contact with the world about him. If this view of the function of nature-study is correct, several conclusions necessarily follow. One of these bears upon the amount of work, which as a rule has been and is far too great. Indeed from any viewpoint the most cursory consideration shows this to be true when the youth of the child, the limitations of time, the other school work, and the over-burdened teacher are taken into account. The amount of work must be adapted to the capacity of the average child under the average conditions and this adaptation can be brought about in most cases only by largely reducing the amount of required or suggested work. A second conclusion bears upon the material suitable for nature work. If the work be reduced in amount, there are manifold and patent reasons why the work touching plants and animals should be retained, the reduction therefore being brought about by the dropping of certain other subjects. This is certainly true for the earlier school years, whatever may be said in favor of dif- ferent and more varied material for the advanced grades. Nothing appeals so strongly to the young child as life, and when life is associated with color and movement the appeal is all but irresistible. Changes in temperature, the formation of soils, the effects of erosion, and a host of other phenomena of great interest and value make no such appeal, do not enter so appar- ently or directly into the child life and can be left with safety until a later school period. The only objection to such a reduction of coulter] values and AIMS OF NATURE-STUDY 5 I work and a confining of the material in large measure to plants and animals will be found to have its origin in the belief that nature-study is a device for imparting information rather than a means for developing power. A further conclusion is, that in presentation there must be a close adaptation to the intellectual development of the child, the methods employed emphasizing the w^ork of the child and very much reducing the importance of those ordinary bureaus of infor- mation, the teacher and the book. Briefly stated nature-study has for its purposes the development, or at least the keeping func- tional, of certain powers of the child; not to give the teacher an additional opportunity for talking or as a means for the exploita- tion of books. The methods should be in every case such as to give the child this training. Still another conclusion, if this view be correct, and one of great importance, is that the work of the various grades must be more closely related and that the work of each grade must have underlying it some definite pedagogic purpose. The fragmen- tary and illogical courses now offered under the head of nature- study show how little real thought has been given to this phase of the subject. The vast amount and range of suggested work merely serve to emphasize the conclusion that much may be done to make nature-study an efficient working tool in the schools by arranging a logically progressive scheme of study for each grade. The work as outlined for each year should have some definite intellectual end in view, and this should be directly connected with the purpose of the work in the year preceding and following. In the absence of such carefully wrought-out courses the work in nature-studv must of necessity be fragmentary and unsatisfactory. At some future time it is the hope of the writer to present briefly a discussion of various intellectual centers about which the work of the grades may be grouped. To summarize very briefly, the materials of nature-study are incidental, its intellectual purpose is the supreme thing. If it becomes an efficient means of securing a symmetrical intellectual development, there must exist a definite conception of its functions and limitations. The amount of work presented must be much reduced and the method of presentation carefully adapted to the child's mental development. Direct observation of nature must take the place of much time now taken by the teacher, and the 52 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 results of these observations must replace much that is now given in readings from the multitudinous so-called '' nature-books." All of which means that we have no better tool for the develop- ment of the perceptive powers and bringing the child into sympa- thetic relations with his surroundings than nature-study, when it is nature-study pure and undefiled. Where it is not, it had much better be dropped from the course. II BY HAROLD W. FAIRBANKS, Ph.D. Berkeley, Cal. Nature-study has developed in our schools as a result of im- pulses from several different directions. On the one hand, we can trace its beginnings through object teaching to Pestalozzi and other educational leaders of the still more distant past, all voicing the feeling that the child's education should deal more with things and less with books. From another side has come the growing influence of science in the university and high school also empha- sizing the importance of contact with nature. While object teaching was formal and too often developed into a lifeless talk about isolated objects, the scientific notions which slowly filtered down into the elementary school frequently brought with them methods and aims not adapted to the building up of immature minds. These two chief sources of inspiration in the nature-study movement differ very materially in their influence so that there has arisen two ways, broadly speaking, of looking at the subject. With one school of teachers the training and culturing of the mental powers is held to be the chief aim; with the others, the acquirement of exact and systematized knowledge. The real differences, however, among those teachers who have given the subject thoughtful attention are probably in most cases not as great as they sometimes appear ; and I can not believe that we are hopelessly adrift, but that there must be some unifying principle underlying all the diverse ideas, not only as to what is really meant by nature-study, but as to what its aims and values should be. If this principle upon which we can all unite can be brought into clearer light, it will go far toward placing nature- study upon a rational basis. FAIRBANKS] VALUES AND AIMS OF NATURE-STUDY 53 We can all agree that nature-study should deal with nature at first hand, should deal with the actual phenomena open to the child's observation. This much accepted, we have the founda- tion for another step involving the content of the subject. In no two localities are the home surroundings and the opportunities for first-hand contact with nature the same. One school is in a valley in an agricultural district; another is in the mountains where the leading industries are connected with mining. One school may be near the ocean with all its wealth of marine life, while another may be far from any large body of water. Spring plants may be growing up in one place while in another the ground is still covered with snow. Hence what is at hand for the children of one place can not always be personally investigated by those of another. It is unreasonable then to attempt to for- mulate any uniform course of study for all parts of the country. In nature-study it matters little the number of facts acquired so long as the pupil is taught to see, think, and form conclusions of his own ; to feel at home in the world and that he is a part of it. The inspiration of the teacher counts for much, and it is far better to cover only a part of the phenomena open to study, taking up those that he is particularly interested in, than to run over the whole field in a formal and lifeless manner. Nature-study should not be an introduction to any particular occupation, such as agriculture or the workshop, nor should it be given for the purpose of an introduction to the science studies of later years. That it really does aid in agriculture, and in the shop, and that it does form a basis for science is nevertheless true. Nature-study has its own direct ends to accomplish — ends which are not trifling and insignificant, but of the highest value. The aim of nature-study should be the putting of the child into harmony with his environment, into sympathetic and intelli- gent relationship with the factors of his surroundings, both or- ganic and inorganic. He does not go at this study as does the scientist, nor for the same purpose. Interest in, and a simple understanding of the common facts of the world about him do not mean that the pupil has consciously grouped these facts for the purpose of arriving at law as does the scientist, but that he has a conception of their obvious relations sufficient for his com- mon needs and to make him a happier dweller among them. We conclude then that nature-study has within itself a prin- 54 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 ciple which can be worked out in all localities, and that its aim is the same everywhere ; but that the materials of study will change with the changing surroundings, and the method with the degree of development of the child. Ill BY MAURICE A. BIGELOW Teachers College, Columbia University [The following is one section of a paper on " Scope and Methods of Scientific Nature-Study" read at the meeting of the New York State Science Teachers' Association, at Syracuse, December 28, 1904.] Dealing as nature-study does with the same materials and processes with which natural science is concerned, some simi- larity in educational values is to be expected. Looking first at the educational aspects of natural science, we find that writers who have discussed the subject have concluded that the educa- tional value of science study lies (i) in its discipline, and (2) in the information which has utilitarian, intellectual, aesthetic, and moral bearings. Along the same lines we must look for the educational value of nature-study. First, with regard to discipline, it has been urged by many writers that natural science is valuable in general education above all because of its disciplinary value. Karl Pearson, in the intro- duction to his '' Grammar of Science " has urged that " in the first and foremost place " modern science finds its support in '' the efficient mental training it provides for the citizen " ; and Professor Bessey, of the University of Nebraska, has said '' that culture is best which so prepares a man that whatever fact pre- sents itself to him, he will be able to arrange it accurately with reference to others." We may urge the same arguments in favor of discipline in nature-study. Obviously this involves the question of method of teaching nature-study ; but it may be taken for granted that all real nature-study, like all modern natural science, is taught on the basis of actual study of natural objects and processes. Na- ture-study so taught ought to have some of the discipline which natural-science study gives. It ought first of all to train the pupils in careful, critical observing; and this ought to lead the pupils to much independent observing. Moreover, such nature- BiGELOw] VALUES AND AIMS OF NATURE-STUDY SS Study ought to teach the pupils to appreciate the value of knowl- edge demonstrated to be true so far as our senses can determine ; and it ought to teach them to compare facts, judge their values, and arrange them with reference to other facts. In short, nature- study properly conducted ought to give the first training in the scientific method in which natural-science studies are able to give more advanced and more complete training. Along this line we have, I believe, one of the greatest values of nature-study — one which we have scarcely begun to appreciate and in which is the possibility of greatest advance in nature-study. As will be suggested in a later section of this paper, with advances in devel- oping the disciplinary value there will come improved selections of more valuable subject-matter. But we must not defend nature-study simply on the ground that the method of study affords discipline in observing, experi- menting, judging, reasoning, etc. The value of such mental processes depends largely upon the ability to apply them in useful lines in every-day life. Karl Pearson admits that, while science-study trains the judgment, it does not necessarily follow that the scientific man has good judgment in every-day life involv- ing fields other than sciences, because he may not be able to carry his scientific method outside the field in which he has acquired it. Likewise, the discipline afforded by nature-study will be valuable in proportion to the pupil's ability to apply it in a useful way. A pupil trained to see the details of structure or activity in a particular object on which attention has been specially centered may not be any better able to observe things in general as he meets them in daily life; and moreover the trained ability to note details is not necessarily associated with ability to discover points of general human interest. As an example, the detailed study of postage stamps might well train the observation, but training to observe with regard to the peculiarities of postage stamps does not mean expertness of observation, although per- haps some improvement, with regard to other things, e. g., com- mon objects in nature. Therefore we could not justify a detailed study of postage stamps on the sole ground that it trains the ob- serving powers, because the value of this is doubtful so far as useful application of the training is concerned. But a study of postage stamps with reference to the history and geography which they suggest might be made a very useful exercise, because the 56 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i. 2, march, 1905 attention might be directed towards things which it is useful to know. This illustration must suffice; but it must be obvious to all who will stop to consider various similar illustrations which are readily called to mind that the value of the power of observing depends, as stated above, largely upon using the power in useful ways. This in its turn involves attention and interest, and the conclusion must be that the discipline of nature-study is best which trains the pupil to apply the method in useful ways — to observing things in nature which are important enough to deserve attention in the busy life of the average citizen. It is here that the discipline and the information of nature-study must go together, for the value of the discipline will in no small measure depend upon the usefulness of the information. Now, the usefulness of the information gained through nature- study is along aesthetic, utilitarian, intellectual, and moral lines ; and the teaching of nature-study which is directed towards the facts which clearly have valuable relations to every-day life in these lines will at the same time make possible discipline which is most valuable. Summarizing, we may defend the place of nature-study in our educational system on the ground that it gives discipline and in- formation which are useful in the life of the average citizen. From this brief outline of the educational value of nature-study, we pass to a statement of the aims which, obviously, grow out of the values. I have previously stated^ these in outline form as follows : (the numbers refer to order of statement not to relative value) (i) To give general acquaintance with and interest in com- mon objects and processes in nature. (2) To give the first train- ing in accurate observing as a means of gaining knowledge direct from nature, and also in the simplest comparing, classifying, and judging values of facts ; in other words, to give the first training in the simplest processes of the scientific method. (3) To give pupils useful knowledge concerning natural objects and processes as they directly affect human life and interests. The first aim (for acquaintance and interest), finds its justifica- tion chiefly along moral and sesthetic lines. It is really the basis of most of the nature-study work which has been done in this country. The second aim (for discipline) simply stands for the ^ In Teachers College Record, 5 : 35. March, 1904. coulter] principles OF NATURE-STUDY S7 practical method of study with special emphasis on accuracy in observing and reasoning. The third aim (for useful knowledge) looks towards results which are primarily useful for their own sake; but which secondarily and incidentally may come into rela- tion with the. study of natural sciences of the higher schools. With differences in materials and advancement of pupils the em- phasis upon the three aims will naturally vary; but no series of lessons and especially the work of no one year should fail to give fair representations to the kind of teaching suggested by each of the three aims as stated. There is no conflict between these aims. The first depends upon the teacher's attitude towards and interest in natural objects and processes ; the second is sim- ply a method of teaching; the third means nothing but selection of useful facts for emphasis. How can such a combination mean a conflict of aims? I know that some teachers will answer, as some authors have written, that the formal development of lessons which the very statement of the aims suggests — and especially the second aim (for accurate, critical work) — is opposed to the first aim (for interest in nature) so completely that the " life and interest will be taken out of nature-study " and the pupils will hate the subject as they are commonly supposed to hate all serious work of the school. This, if true, is a serious criticism. Limitations of space will not allow proper defense here ; but I intend to refer to it in a paper on " Informal Nature-Study " in some future issue of this journal and describe some work observed in certain schools in which nature-study is " good fun " and at the same time serious, critical work. PRINCIPLES OF NATURE-STUDY BY PROFESSOR JOHN M. COULTER The University of Chicago [Editorial Note. — This paper was prepared quite independently of the preceding symposium; but it touches so definitely upon educational values and aims of nature-study that it should be read in connection with the papers which discuss the problems of aims and values.] Under the name of nature-study work has been introduced into the schools that is hard to define. It seeks to supply a need that 5^ THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 is evident enough, but whether it actually does supply it is an open question. The statements of its purpose range from culti- vation of a sentimental love for nature to training in habits of exact observation and inference. When to this confused state- ment of purpose there is added the fact that it has been thrust upon a host of unwilling and unprepared teachers, it is no wonder that *' nature-study " is an ill-defined, inchoate thing, the despair of the primary teacher and the joke of the scientific fraternity. And yet, its purpose is sound, and it must outgrow its ill-defined beginnings. It is certainly a great problem, to be solved by extensive experiment rather than by preconceived notions. I am quite prepared, therefore, to find that some of the suggestions I am about to make will be disapproved by experience. In the outset it is well to state the purpose of nature-study as clearly as possible; not its incidental advantages, but its domi- nant motive. Naturally it is just here that we may part com- pany, but the dominant motive must determine the method. In my judgment the great function of nature-study in elementary education is to supplement what may be called the conventional education. The latter of necessity compels attention to certain abstractions of language and numbers that are not of paramount interest to the pupil at the time. At the same time, the child possesses what I have called '' tentacles of inquiry " that are ex- tended towards natural objects. Too frequently a strictly con- ventional education atrophies these tentacles through disuse, and when later in life the opportunity for work, in science presents itself, there is no response, for loss of interest has followed loss of power. I believe that this benumbing effect of the exclusively conventional education upon the natural interest in observing has much to do with the small proportion of college students at- tracted to the laboratories. What I have called the conventional education is necessary, but it needs to be supplemented by nature- study in order that the tentacles of inquiry may remain func- tional. To me the keeping functional natural powers is the fun- damental purpose of nature-study in elementary schools, that later in education and later in life the pupil may not be robbed of oppor- tunity and enjoyment. If this purpose be sound, the methods of nature-study are to be judged by their success in fulfilling it. This leads first to certain criticisms of much work in nature- studv that I have observed. How extensivelv these criticisms COULTER J PRINCIPLES Of NATURES J UDV 59 apply I have no means of knowing. Of course the most obvious weakness is the unprepared teacher. For the most part they are not to be blamed, for the work has been thrust upon them, and they arc more or less conscious of their helplessness ; and, furthermore, quite a number of the reputed leaders in the subject are distinctly " blind leaders of the blind." Accepting the teachers, however, such as they are, my first criti- cism of observed methods would be directed against what I have been in the habit of calling " dead work " ; which means the obser- vation of insignificant, trivial things ; work that means nothing when it is done. I realize that many a teacher, through lack of knowledge, is compelled to occupy the time with anything that occurs to her, and is sometimes honest enough to call the exercise " busy work." For example, I have seen period after period given to a study of the forms of leaves, chiefly because the forms are endless and illustrative material is easily obtained. A second criticism of observed methods is the attempt to arouse a factitious interest in nature-study by all sorts of playful and imaginative devices. Most of the books dealing with nature- study cater to this tendency and perhaps are largely responsible for it. These devices disgust strong children, just as does the foolish and forced sprightliness of many primary teachers. Nature-study, imbedded as it is in conventional education, is the one chance for exact and independent observation, for cultivating the ideas that between cause and effect there can be no hiatus, that imagination is beautiful and most useful in its place but that its place is never to lead to a misconception of facts, and that there should be no playing fast and loose with truth. Passing from the statement of purpose and criticisms of ob- served methods to a statement of principles, I would say that if the purpose of nature-study is to keep functional the tentacles of inquiry, it follows that a test of success is interest. It is evident, therefore, that no science can be presented in any completeness or in any definitely organized sequence, and hence the purpose must be continuity of interest and not continuity of subject. The re- sulting interest must be checked by the objects of interest, which must be important, and so I reach my general thesis that nature- study must look to a continuity of interest in important subjects. What are appropriate subjects? I would suggest an answer under three heads: (i) Thiuos of common experience. This 6o THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 means that there can be no fixed schedule appropriate for every school, and it also means- an adaptable teacher. The teacher who has secured a definite " outline " from some one is in danger of passing by the most important natural objects within reach of the school. I have seen such an " outline " prepared on the seacoast and used by a teacher in the central west. When it came to the subject of seaweeds, a few miserable things were obtained with much difficulty from the seashore, and the glorious forest with which the school was surrounded was left without observation! This is an extreme case, but essentially the same thing is common enough. (2) No subject should he pressed too far, for interest may pass into disgust. Watch the pupil, not the outline! (3) Observation should be directed more towards activity than towards form and structure. It is fundamental in botany that plants be regarded as things alive and at work; and it is also of far greater interest to a child to watch a plant doing something than to observe form and structure, which in the very nature of things mean nothing to the observer. What are appropriate methods? (i) Very definite work, that has already been traversed by the teacher; for it is confusing and discouraging and disastrous to work at random. Some very definite result must be plainly in sight. (2) Individual work in observation or experiment, which means personal responsibility. (3) Unprejudiced observation, which means that the pupil is not to be told what ought to be seen ; some children are so docile that they never fail to see what they are told to see. (4) Bring- ing together and comparing individual results, a thing of funda- mental importance, for it develops differences in results which must be settled by repetition, shows what is essential in the results and what amount of variation is possible, develops the habit of caution in generalization, and impresses the need and nature of adequate proof. What are appropriate results? (i) A sustained interest in natural objects and the phenomena of nature. (2) An indepen- dence in observation and conclusion. (3) Some conception as to what an exact statement is. (4) Some conception of what con- stitutes proof; in short, an independent, rational individual, such as the world needs to-day more than anything else. I feel strongly that our educational system lacks efficiency in just this direction, and that continuous training in exact observation and inference. THAYER] CHILDREN'S GARDENS OI beginning with the kindergarten, must result in more sanity among adults. CHILDREN'S GARDENS AT DOWNING STREET SCHOOL, WORCESTER, MASS. BY EDNA R. THAYER Teacher of Grades Two and Three Photographs by C. F. Hodge Very early in the spring of 1903 all the children in the schools of the city of Worcester were offered seeds for planting by the leading seedsman, and many teachers who were interested in garden work gladly accepted the offer for their pupils. At the Downing St. school the children were allowed to choose their own vegetable seeds ; but in the case of flower seeds the easily grown varieties like the nasturtium and calliopsis were given to the lower grades, stocks and carnations to the older children. All flower seeds were planted in pots at home in accordance with di- rections given about drainage, soil, depth to plant, and care to be given. This flower growing was successful and on the last day of school the children brought their plants, with pots gayly dressed in fancy paper, for an exhibit. Some very good radishes and lettuce were grown in beds in the school-yard, but no attempt was made at a report of vegetables grown at home. This spring, 1904, when the same offer of seeds was made, it seemed wise to attempt gardening on a larger scale, as the first trial had shown that the children were eager for the work, and we were satisfied that gardening ought to be made a permanent part of our course in nature-study. As I was especially interested, it naturally fell to my lot to distribute the seeds and supervise the work through the summer. I decided that the gardens must be at the children's homes, because there was no available land near the school, and more particularly because each child would feel that it was his ozvii garden and that he had a personal responsi- bility for every seed given if it was at his home. Notes were sent to the parents asking their consent to the children's having seeds, and permission was readily obtained for more than four hundred children. Each child selected three kinds of seeds, either 62 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 A home-garden planted and cared for by a girl of twelve. The largest of the children's home-gardens. THAYER] CHILDREN'S GARDENS 63 flower or vei^ctable. The choice was not always wise, for some of the younger children, probably acting on suggestions of their par- ents, chose seeds most difficult to germinate. Girls and boys were about equally divided in their choice of flowers and vegetables, which was much to my surprise ; and later in the summer I found the girls quite as successful vegetable gardeners as the boys. During the days following the distribution of the seeds little conversation was heard about the school building and neighbor- hood save of planting; and it soon became evident that what the children lacked in knowledge and experience they made up by their enthusiasm. Would it last through the summer, was the question. It seemed necessary that the children should be watched over and encouraged, and so they were told that I would visit their gardens when they were well started and that my disap- pointment would be great if they had nothing to show me. They were told, also, that the New England Agricultural Society had asked the school children to make exhibits of flowers and vege- tables at the fair to be held in Worcester early in September and that it was hoped that every child in Downing St. school would raise something worthy of exhibit. It was understood by every child that if he were assisted by others in the production of his flowers or vegetables, they would not be eligible for exhibit at the fair. Knowing this, a little girl in the lowest grade chose only vegetable seeds in order to avoid any suspicion that her father, who was a florist, had helped her. As soon as the home-gardens were fairly started, work was begun on some garden beds for the school-yard. The year before we had made an attempt at a flower bed, but in our ignorance had made it by heaping the loam on the hard gravel of the school- yard and in midsummer our plants wilted and died. We had thus learned from experience that the bed must be lowered nearly to the level of the yard to prevent drying out. Volunteers removed the loam, excavated through the hard gravel to the depth of eighteen inches, then replaced the loam. New beds were made in the same way, two for flowers and one for vegetables and a fourth for a dozen varieties of sweet herbs. Boys and girls in the school volunteered to care for the beds ; and, with an occasional reminder, they were kept well weeded and watered throughout the summer. As soon as there was something to see in the home-gardens, I besran to visit them whenever I could before and after school until 64 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i. 2, march, 1905 the term ended and after that I made systematic visits, a street at a time, until all were inspected. I saw gardens good, bad and indifferent ; the first, however, being largely in the majority. Of the bad, in most cases the child was not to blame, for the failure plainly resulted from poor soil or lack of sunshine. The gardens which I term indifferent belonged to the class of children who delight in beginning new things but who have not the moral 'tf .»« .Jty 2L-- " The comparisons which a child would draw between his garden and those of his neighbors were interesting and helpful." stamina to push on to a completed result. However, the lesson was probably helpful, so far as it went. In very little of our edu- cational plan is a subject studied to completion; everything learned or done is a fragment which some day may serve a purpose which we can not foresee. As the summer went on and hot, sultry days came, it was won- derful how many gardens did do well. Even the transplanting was done so carefully and the plants so well protected from the sun's rays that few were lost. Mothers told me that their children did not wish to go away even for a few days, because the garden would need attention during their absence. The comparisons which a child would draw between his garden and those of his thayek] CHILDREN'S GARDENS 65 neighbors were interesting and helpful, and the boy or girl whose garden was a little in advance of the others was indeed envied. When the time for the fair drew near, in order to know defi- nitely what each child would contribute, postal cards were sent to every family whose children had been successful in their work, directing how to cut the flowers, prepare the vegetables, and that they be brought to the school-house at an early hour on the morn- ing of the opening of the fair. Wagons had been secured to A corner of the exhibit at the agricultural fair More than thirty kinds of vegetables and all common varieties of flowers. carry the exhibit to the fair-grounds. Every child who exhibited was given an exhibitor's ticket, allowing free admission each day. This privilege alone more than repaid the children for the hours of labor spent in the garden work, for no child ever could stay long enough at an agricultural fair, and a large percentage of the children had never before attended one. The judges awarded the Downing St. school the first premium of $7.00 for the best collection from any one school. Thirteen other premiums were won by individual children of the school — six first premiums, four second and three third — amounting to $6.00 more. There were more than thirty kinds of vegetables 6^ THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 exhibited, the largest production being two mammoth whaleback squashes weighing twenty-eight and twenty-nine pounds apiece, and the most unique, a handsome pepper plant, full of peppers, growing in a tin pail. The flower table included all common varieties from the showy nasturtium and marigold to the dainty pansy and the sturdy dahlia. The finest golden marigold plant that I have ever seen, one literally covered with huge blossoms, was grown and exhibited in a large pot. A little girl was the proud owner and she won the first premium for marigolds. Many people sought the attendant to inquire if the exhibit was entirely the work of the children, none of whom were over fourteen years of age, the youngest were but five, and the average was probably not more than ten. I doubt if any summer ever spent by the children of the Down- ing St. school has been as profitable as this one. They had defi- nite, pleasing, out-of-door occupation ; and not once have I heard a complaint, heard so often summers before, that the mothers would be glad when school began so that boys and girls would be away from the street and its dangers. WHY SOME SCHOOL-GARDENS ARE FAILURES BY T. R. CROSWELL Supervisor of Training School, Los Angeles, Cal. What is a school-garden ? On your answer depends very much the success or failure you will make of one. The school-garden of certain parts of Europe forms a portion of the income of the tenant schoolmaster. It is more than an experiment in showing how things grow. It represents a suc- cessful venture as well as an object lesson in elementary agricul- ture. Such conditions do not exist in the public schools of America. Yet many writers, advocating the school-garden for our schools, cite these foreign ones as models. One of the best known school-gardens in the United States consists of limited beds in all sorts of available corners of a limited school-yard. In one corner a group of children care for a bed of flowers, in other angles other varieties are cared for by other groups. Some are wild flowers, some are domesticated. Through croswell] school-gardens 67 this garden the children of this city school have come to know many wild flowers that otherwise would have remained strangers ; some knowledge of the care of plants has been imparted ; and the beds have furnished specimens for analysis and study in the class- room. This work is well adapted to the needs of the pupils of this particular school, and the garden deserves the reputation it possesses. Yet would you say that your school-garden exists for the purpose of teaching the recognition of wild flowers, learning to care for them, and of raising supplies for the botany and art classes ? Many school-gardens are planted with vegetables of all sorts — radishes, lettuce, cabbage, cauliflower, potatoes, squash, corn, beans, etc. In fact, some of them show a sample of almost every- thing which might be grown in a market garden. It would be difficult for anyone to say why all of these are planted ; certainly it would be impossible to give an adequate reason for each. But all are planted regardless of the location of the school, whether in a large city or in a country district. It is probable in both cases the object, as stated, is to enable the children to see these vegetables in the process of growth. The object may be, how- ever, to show how to grow different vegetables. But whatever the aim, the result is the same in the majority of cases. The garden is started late, so that only a few radishes mature before the close of school. These are gathered and eaten. Then comes the long summer vacation and the end of the school-garden as far as the children are concerned, for in most instances the condi- tions are such that the garden, which was started amid much enthusiasm and with some promise, ends in unsightly neglect. The children have seen something growing; they have, if the conditions were favorable, had an opportunity to exercise a measure of responsibility during the early growth; but for the most part they have experienced the discouraging effect of failing to com- plete what they started to do. The evil effect of such failure, apart from its demoralizing influence on the general character, is more than an offset to the good which may come from any knowl- edge gained. The creation of a desire for plant culture, which should be the result, is lacking ; not only that, but the fresh enthu- siasm of the first attempt it lost. Never again will there be such an opportunity to develop in the same pupils a genuine love for 68 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 gardening and the wholesome influences which come with the suc- cessful nurture of plants. These examples are sufficient to show that the conditions exist- ing in one locality may not exist in another. The conditions will modify both the aim and the possibilities of the garden. In each case the purpose of the garden should be definite, and should be determined beforehand, by the nature of the surroundings and the possibility of success. To attempt the impossible does not speak well for one's sanity ; not to know what you are trying to do shows lack of business ability ; to encourage your pupils in a forlorn hope is dishonest, and the effort is foredoomed to failure. Summarizing, a school-garden has often failed for one of the following reasons : It was simply an imitation, a fad without a purpose ; the purpose was too general ; it was not adapted to existing conditions ; or the connection between the end sought and the plan followed was too loose. The success of a school-garden should be measured, not by its extent, nor by the opportunity which it offers for securing photo- graphs of groups of children at work, but by the effectiveness with which it supplies the means of satisfying a genuine need on the part of the pupils of a given school. Two gardens may be equally successful, yet widely different. In a large city school where the children have little opportunity for either observation or work in the soil, to plant for the purpose of seeing how the com- mon vegetables grow, even though there may be no prospects of any crop, is entirely proper, provided the children are not encouraged to hope for the impossible. If, however, such a pur- pose is the leading one in a village or small city where the children see the different plants growing under more normal conditions, and where by a little encouragement they can be led to work their own little plots at home, then such a garden shows stupidity on the part of the promoter. In the smaller place its purpose should be much more specific ; the school should put much more em- phasis on the multiplying of plots at home, and less on show at school ; more on specific knowledge of how to cultivate those things within the ability of the child that may add to the beauty or attractiveness of the individual home, less on how radishes or potatoes grow ; more attention to those things which can be surely grown, and which by their success will deeepen and extend the interest in such soil lore as will make lives happier, purer and more useful. BiGELOw] PLANTS WITHOUT SOIL 69 CHEMICAL TABLETS FOR FEEDING PLANTS GROWING WITHOUT SOIL BY EDWARD F. BIGELOW, Ph.D. Editor of "Nature and Science" in St. Nicholas. Author of "How Nature Study should be Taught " [Editorial Note. — The experiments described in this paper are so prac- ticable and adaptable to every schoolroom that they deserve to be familiar to every teacher of nature-study. For this reason we have urged the author to re-write the earlier accounts of his experiments and make them more generally available for teachers of nature-study and high-school biology.] I am requested to tell teachers how I use in tablets the chemicals of Sachs' nutrient solution for the artificial feeding of plants. For those not familiar with feeding plants with chemicals I first quote briefly from Professor Sachs •} '' The complete revolution which rational agricultvire and for- estry have experienced through the establishing of the theory of the nutrition of plants, proves how much has been accomplished in this department. It would extend far beyond the scope of this lecture to reproduce even briefly the substance of the literature of the subject. The most significant result of the development of the nutrition theory is met with, however, in the fact that we are now able to rear plants artificially — that we are in a position, with chemically pure water to which we add some few chemically pure salts, to rear artificially highly developed plants as well as the simplest algae (and mutatis mutandis, also fungi) — that from in- conspicuous and often scarcely ponderable quantities of vegetable substance, quantities of it as large as we choose may be produced in this way. " Such being the favorable position of affairs, I regard it as the simplest and most instructive method to connect the main points of the theory of nutrition of plants, so far as they concern the food materials, with the description of an experiment in artificial nutrition made with a highly organized plant. I think that in this manner the essential and important points come into view more clearly than with any other mode of exposition. In the year i860 I published the results of experiments which demonstrated ^ See Lecture XVII, " The Nutritive Materials of Plants," in Professor Julius von Sachs' " On the Physiology of Plants." 70 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 that land-plants are capable of absorbing their nutritive matters out of watery solutions, without the aid of soil, and that it is possible in this way not only to maintain plants alive and growing for a long time, as had long been known, but also to bring about a vigorous increase of their organic substance, and even the pro- duction of seeds capable of germination." I have utilized all that this honored botanist and others have recorded regarding artificial nutrition of plants, and have added these three points : ( i ) Convenience of supplying the chemicals in tablet form. (2) Novelties (to attract the young folks) in sit- uations of growing plants. (3) A germinating case for scientific or popular observation and experiment. This is how I came to use chemicals in tablet form for feeding plants. For many years I have been visiting schoolrooms and talking to the young folks on nature-study. I have also been accompanied by young folks, in parties of from a few to two hun- dred and fifty in number, on natural-history excursions along the roadsides, across the fields, through the forests and in the meadows and swamps. In a single year I have taken as many as 4,500 girls and boys on tramps aggregating more than 175 miles. Most of this has been in the spring; but just why I have never been able to understand, for surely Nature is interesting at all sea- sons. But requests for the help of the naturalist-guide come almost wholly in the spring. At this season plant fife is especially active, new, Hving and growing. That is — let me qualify this statement — the plant life outdoors to which I introduced the young folks. Indoors that to which they introduced me, in the form of seeds germinating on cotton, blotting paper or sawdust, most fre- quently suggested death rather than life. Sometimes the mass would be decaying, filthy, ill-smelling, disgusting. And the young folks would apologetically say, " You should have seen it a few days ago, then it was growing nicely." At this same time, plant life outdoors was becoming better and better ; every day added to the charm, and brought new interests. Gradually the impression deepened that something was wrong. Every time the young folks or teachers called my attention to germinating seeds in bad condition I felt a jar of discord. I admit that it took several years of such experience to formulate itself into more than annoyance, and to become a determination to find a remedv. I was familiar, as are most teachers of botany. BIGELOW] PLANTS WITHOUT SOIL Fig. I. An egg-shell garden. Several common plants grown three feet tall from sawdust in egg- shells Sawdust kept moist with water during germination and afterwards with the solution i- J?«l ^^^ W^ ^m. WKK^M ^■■■HHHHIil^HIIHHiHHHIi HHHHt' H^HHIHIF Fig 2. In center " agateware" pan cotton plants are growing in bits of crushed stone. In outer pans beans are growing m sawdust Fed by the nutrient solution 72 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 with Sachs' sohition from experiments made several years before in a university laboratory ; but it took time for the suggestion to arise that the solution could be used aside from technical experi- FiG 3. Oats in a lamp-i;himney " struggle for existence." Wrap a roll of cotton in black cloth, push it into the chimney, and then with a stick or wire poke seeds in between glass and cloth. Dur- ing germination keep moist with water, and afterwards with the solution. Hairy vetch on cloth netting stretched over the mouth of the tumbler, the roots hanging down into the solution. Many other common plants grow well in same position. ments, and by the young folks as a common plant food. But one day light came. I ordered some of the mixture in bulk, put up loose in two-ounce packages. Later, as I saw a physician leave tablets for a patient and heard him refer to the convenience of BiGELow] PLANTS WITHOUT SOIL 73 these over the old method with powders and mysterious mixtures, the suggestion came to mind — Why not put up those nutrient chemicals in tablets ? I at once gave an order to a manufacturing chemist for 10,000 compressed tablets. This was in the early part of 1900. All that spring and summer I experimented with my tablets, as did a few teachers of botany to whom I gave a supply. We used the entire 10,000. They were found to work marvel- lously well, even beyond my fondest hope. The first public an- nouncement was on page 557 of " Nature and Science " of St. Nicholas for April, 1901, in a series of prizes offered to the young folks for germinating seeds. The result of that contest, during the summer and autumn of 1901, was astonishing. The children made use of the tablets most successfully in growing plants in all sorts of ingenious situations. I was deluged with letters from young folks, teachers and parents, describing experiments. Sev- eral of these letters and a number of illustrations were published during the following spring in St. Nicholas (April, 1902). Later accounts were given in School Science, Chicago ; and Popular Educator, Boston. Each of the tablets is composed of the following : Common table salt (sodium chloride), 2^ grains ; plaster of Paris — gypsum (cal- cium sulphate), 2^ grains; Epsom salts (magnesium sulphate) ; phosphate of lime, nearly the same as burned bones (calcium phosphate), 2i/^ grains; East Indian saltpetre — nitre (potassium nitrate), 5 grains; compounds of iron and chlorine (ferric chlo- ride), nearly ^^ grain. To make the food solution, two of these tablets are required for each pint (500 ccm. nearly) of water. Crush the tablets to be used and put the powder in the water. Shake or stir thoroughly before using. Keep the plants thor- oughly moistened with this solution, which is both drink and food for them. The solution prepared from the tablets will nourish a plant if the roots can be kept supplied with it, even on top of a stone, or a brick, between two sheets of glass (see Fig. 4), on crushed rock (see Fig. 2), sawdust (see Fig. i), pebbles, bits of glass, or any similar insoluble substance. Plants thrive well on perforated cloth or wire-netting stretched tightly across any receptacle that is kept filled with the solution (see Fig. 3). The photographs pub- lished in St. Nicholas and other periodicals to which I have re- ferred and also the new ones accompanying this article show some 74 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 of these situations. But for novelty or scientific experiment there are many others equally good. Plants may even be suspended in Fig. 4. White lupins, growing from successive plantings in a germinating case made of two sheets of glass tied together with cotton wadding next to the back glass and a layer of black close-woven cloth between the wadding and the glass in front. The cloth is for a dark background and to force the roots to grow in one plane between the cloth and glass in front. The case is kept standing on edge (see Fig. 5). The seeds are planted on the upper edge between the front glass and the black cloth, and kept moist (with water until rootlets appear and then with the solution). Strips of cotton should be used to cover the edge and protect the seeds from drying until the plants begin to grow (see Fig. 5). At the end of two weeks there is a living chart showing successive stages. Fig. 5. Germinating cases, described in connection with FJg 4, arranged in card-catalogue style in an enameled pan. By this arrangement space is economized and the roots in each case, except the one in front, are darkened by the adjoining case. A piece of black cloth may be used to cover the front glass. The excess solution poured over the upper edges is collected in the pan, and from time to time is used again to moisten the cotton above. mid-air and grown, if the roots are kept moist with the solution. Apply the solution to the roots in any way that you please, keep BiGELow] PLANTS WITHOUT SOIL 75 the stem and leaves in the Hght, and the whole plant will grow and thrive if it is kept warm. I have not found so much advan- tage in keeping the roots in darkness as I had anticipated. In most of my experiments they have been wholly in the light. This is undoubtedly somewhat of a disadvantage to the plant, but to be able to watch the development of roots adds greatly to the interest. I have found the tablets somewhat helpful as a fertilizer, but my belief is that they are most efficacious when they are used alone and not added to earth or other nutritious substances. Contrary to the persistent belief or to the inquiries of most young folks and of many teachers, let me say that the tablets do not germinate nor aid in germinating the seeds. They feed the plant after the tiny roots have been formed and are ready to take food. In fact, the application of the chemical solution in the very earliest stages of germination has seemed to me to be a disad- vantage. To germinate a seed only three things are necessary : warmth, moisture and air. It will not germinate with only one or two of these. It must have all three. The tablet solution will not supply the warmth nor the air, and the moisture is better sup- plied by water than by the solution. Darkness is helpful, but not an absolute essential for germination. Allow the seeds to sprout in the ordinary old-fashioned method on moist cotton, blotting paper, etc., and apply the solution only to feed them as soon as the young plants tell you by starting their roots that they are ready for food. For four years I have experimented extensively with this solu- tion by growing plants in a great variety of situations. This has not been work, it has been play, most enjoyable hours snatched from the pressure of many duties. I have come to love plants, not alone from the scientific or the esthetic standpoint, but as pets. My desire has been to< create and increase an interest and love for the growth of our common plants, in their entirety, as living things. It is not enough to know the flowers, not even enough to know the plants, that is at any one stage of their exist- ence, in the sense of knowing either the name or structure. The message coming to us from the Great Nature-Study Teacher, re- garding one species of plants, was intended I think to apply to all. He said " consider the Hlies of the field how they gronK" [How to obtain the tablets. — A box containing 30 tablets, with full direc- tions for use, will be mailed for ten cents — a very small amount which is 76 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 just sufficient to pay for the tablets, printing, packing, and postage. The author has no financial, only an educational, interest in the sale. This low price is possible only because thousands of boxes are prepared at a time by a manufacturing chemist. Large quantities have been purchased by schools, and colleges find them most convenient for making the standard Sachs' solution. Address Edward F. Bigelow, Stamford, Ct.— Managing Editor.] A NATURE-STUDY LESSON WITH THE MOLDS BY PROFESSOR F. L. STEVENS, Ph.D. North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts Molds of bread, cheese and fruits are only too common objects in the household ; but little real knowledge prevails regarding their nature, mode of origin or effects. This field of observation and experimentation is so httle known that it is by most teachers either never thought of at all or considered too difBcult to be of use to the nature-study classes. Many simple and instructive experi- ments, however, may be made in any school at no cost with these simple plants, and much interest aroused and knowledge attained. Experiment i. To see whether any desired kind of mold can be produced at will upon moist bread. Have one or two of the pupils place a slice of moist bread in a glass fruit-can and heat it in a steamer just as you would in can- ning fruit. Then seal it up while hot also just as you would in canning fruit. Bring these cans to school. Also secure some moldy cheese or bread. Suppose the cheese has on it a yellow mold. Now the problem is to see if we can grow this yellow mold in the bread. Heat the tip of a hat-pin in a match or lamp flame, let it cool a second and dip it into the yellow mold. Now draw this hat-pin across the bread in the jar. Then close the can and watch it daily to see if the yellow mold comes in the place you have planted it. Try this experiment with various kinds of molds. Experiment 2. To see whether molds will develop if all in the vessel are killed and all air excluded. Proceed as you did in Experiment i. Can the bread as you would can fruit, and let it stay in the schoolroom for a few weeks to see whether molds develop. Molds should not grow here BiGELow] NATURE-STUDY IN HIGH SCHOOLS 77 because you have killed all that were present in the can and bread originally and prevented any more from entering. Experiment 3. To see w^hether germs abound in the air. Open the can used in Experiment 2, thus allowing the air to enter. Let the cover remain off for a day or so" and observe whether the bread then molds or not. Do not allow it to become dry, since molds can not grow in dry substances at all. Germs are driftihg about in the air in very great abundance, and when the can is open many of them will fall upon the bread and begin to grow. The fact that they do develop thus shows that the air contained them in considerable quantity. Whenever you see apples or other fruit decaying it is because germs somewhat similar to those of the bread have gotten under the skin of the fruit and are there growing, thus causing the decay. If the entrance of these germs could be prevented, the fruit would not decay. On the other hand, if germs are placed in healthy apples, decay is produced. You may illustrate by an experiment. Experiment 4. Secure a perfectly healthy apple and a rotten apple in a well developed condition of rot, that is, an apple cov- ered with mold. Stick a hat-pin into the mold and then into the healthy apple. Set the healthy apple away and watch it from day to day to see whether the rot develops in the place where you planted the mold. Another disease on the sweet potato which causes the potato to become soft and mushy is a good disease to use in a similar experiment, to illustrate the same point. From all of the above experiments the child will glean a number of valuable facts and insight and interest in a feature of daily life with which very few people are in touch. NATURE-STUDY IN HIGH SCHOOLS BY MAURICE A. BIGELOW Teachers College, Columbia University The explanation on the cover that The Nature-Study Review is a journal " devoted to all phases of nature-study for elementary schools " has led readers to inquire why nature-study is thus em- phasized as an elementary-school subject when much work in the 78 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 lower years of high schools is nature-study, as defined in the first symposium, rather than study of the principles of natural sciences. First, in explaining why the sub-title of this journal makes special mention of elementary schools, it should be said that those persons who were responsible for the initial steps towards organ- izing the journal held as fundamental propositions the following : (i) that nature-study and not natural science is the proper work of elementary schools, (2) that high-school studies based on ele- mentary-school studies of nature should be advanced to the intro- duction of the elementary principles of natural science. Any student of scientific education will be led to similar views if he carefully examines nature-study and natural science in some of the most progressive schools in this country. It is clear beyond question that nature-study is and will be most prominent in ele- mentary schools, and that the high-school work is decidedly in the line of organized natural science. Furthermore, the most impor- tant unsolved problems of scientific education naturally concern the beginning work, which is in the elementary schools. For these reasons The Nature-Study Review was designedly '* devoted to all phases of nature-study in elementary schools " ; but that this primary purpose of the journal need not affect its usefulness to high-school work in the line of nature-study will appear in the following analysis of the relations of such work to that of the lower school. With a good foundation of nature-study gained in the ele- mentary school, it is reasonable to hold that all high-school science should be primarily real science study, that is to say, it should be close analytical and synthetical study of natural objects and processes primarily for the sake of gaining acquaintance with the general principles and methods of modern science. This is now realized in the teaching of the physical sciences in many high schools; but on the whole the teaching of the biological sciences is not well organized on the basis of scientific study of principles. To a large extent the biological work of the first or second year of our high schools must for the present give much attention to nature-study (we commonly call it natural history), because the pupils in the great majority of cases come to the high schools with little or no knowledge concerning the common things in nature around them ; and the high school must first of all take uo the work left undone in the elementarv schools. I have BiGELOw] NATURE-STUDY IN HIGH SCHOOLS jg already pointed out in Chapter IV, pp. 320-327, of " The Teaching of Zoology in the Secondary School " (N. Y., Longsmans, Green & Co., 1904), that this nature-study work in the biology of high schools is probably a temporary compromise made necessary because of the undeveloped nature-study in lower schools ; and that with the advance of nature-study the larger part of the natural history for the sake of general acquaintance with common living things will be taught in the elementary school, leaving the high school free to devote its time to more serious study of biology as a science, with incidental instead of primary emphasis on natural history. But no matter what may be the future developments, the fact remains that the high-school work in natural history or biological nature-study presents no peculiar problems. It is in all essentials the same study of living animals and plants which in many schools is conducted in the upper grammar grades. Much of it is study of living things out of doors, usually for the sake of identification and general acquaintance ; but this, too, is well accomplished in elementary schools. I have seen fifth-grade classes do field work in study of birds and trees which would be highly creditable to the first year of high school. We must conclude that the high- school study of natural history is so similar to the nature-study of the lower schools that in dealing primarily with nature-study for elementary education this journal will most directly approach the problems, and at the same time the materials will be just as useful to the high-school teacher who has occasion to present nature-studies either as an incidental or as a prominent part of science, especially biology. Finally, in addition to the present reasons wh}^ high-school teachers of biology are directly interested in nature-study as a part of their teaching and the indirect interest which the best teachers of any grade of our educational system have in the low^er work upon which they must build, there is still another important stimulus for interest in nature- study in that more and more the elementary-school teachers are looking to the science specialists in the high school for directions, thus leading high-school teachers to get acquainted with the problems of the lower school. 80 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 EDITORIALS THE COLLABORATORS OF THE REVIEW Unfortunately, it appears that many persons, and even certain journals, have interpreted the long list of collaborators as meaning an aim to include all active leaders of nature-study in the United States and in the Provinces of Canada. As a result of this inter- pretation, we have received several dozen letters calling attention to the fact that certain names, in some cases very well-known ones, are not among those of the collaborators of this journal. We explain as follows : The list of collaborators does not at all adequately repre- sent the wide-spread interest in nature-study in America. The list was originally made up on short notice from the suggestions of less than half a dozen persons who knew from personal acquaintance that certain individuals would probably give their time and influence to the movement for a journal of nature-study. The list was necessarily an extended one because the editors needed, especially in the first year, the cooperation of some repre- sentatives of each of the various phases of science in higher educa- tional institutions and of nature-study in schools in various geo- graphical localities. Since the prospectus was issued correspon- dence has indicated that many more names would have to be added if the published list of collaborators was to pretend to be a direc- tory of the leaders of nature-study in the various States and in Canada who would gladly give their cooperation. The original list has already ceased to represent accurately those who have pledged their support to The Review, for some of our most val- uable cooperation is now coming from persons whose names will not be published except when signed to articles. With this expla- nation we trust that there will be no more misunderstanding, and that the editorial board composed of editors and collaborators will be regarded simply an arrangement for promoting the editorial and business interests of the journal, rather than as a directory of active workers in the field represented. ARTICLES BY THOSE WHO BOTH THINK AND DO The first two numbers of The Review give prominence to more or less theoretical papers on the educational problems of nature- PERIODICAL LITERATURE «I study, and naturally most of these papers have been contributed by writers who have approached nature-study from the viewpoint of the broader questions of education which appeal especially to college men and school officials. This represents, however, but one side of the problem. We must have the opinions of those who are able to observe and reason concerning nature-study ; but we must give an equally prominent place to the results obtained by teachers who are actually at work in the elementary schools. As an example, we have one such paper (on school-gardens) in this number, and will have several in the next. Teachers who work out even minor points which may interest others are invited to send concise accounts of their results to the editors of this journal. We can not promise to publish everything ; but we want to have available a generous supply of material from which to make selection guided by our best judgment as to what best repre- sents actual doing in the field of nature-study. ORIGINAL OBSERVATIONS Very frequently in connection with the nature-study work in schools there is observed some interesting point which is' appar- ently new^ or at least not mentioned in the books commonly accessible. Records of several such observations have already been sent to the editors, and some of them will be published with critical notes by experts. Teachers are invited to send brief accounts of observations which they think may prove to be new. BOOK REVIEWS Animal Stories Retold from St. Nicholas. Six volumes planned, two published. Edited by M. H. Carter, of New York Training School for Teachers. N. Y., Century Co. 1904. About 200 pages each, illustrated. 65 cents each. The introductory volume of this series is entitled '' About Ani- mals." The aim of the series as therein stated is to give young readers " some idea of the great animal world, and to set them thinking about our relation to it." In consequence the informa- tion and anecdotes selected for this volume cover a wide field. In addition to narratives and some rhymes about animals, certain sections are introduced to awaken scientific interest and to empha- 82 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 size the natural-history point of view. Of these chapters, " A Brief Survey of the Animal Kingdom," states the most important facts of animal classification in very simple language, and is evi- dently intended to help children place the various common types. The chapter is too brief to serve for more than this^ and if used in connection with animal study should be supplemented by fuller explanation and illustration. In the chapter, " Mother Nature and the Jointed Stick " the description of the use of the vertebrate skeleton and the muscular control of the body is introduced by means of an analogy which confuses rather than clarifies, but the structural comparison be- tween the human and other vertebrate skeletons is interestingly shown by a number of ingenious diagrams. Chapters of special value for arousing interest in animals in their natural environment, and for fostering a desire to protect and study them in their wild state are, " Animal Tracks in the Snow," '' How some Animals become Extinct," and " Hunting with a Camera." The remainder of the book is made up of stories of animals in captivity and as pets of man. The stories are well told and are full of interest, pathos and humor together with many accurate and valuable observations of animal ways. In this connection, it is not obvious why the chapter on the mounting of large ani- mals is introduced. This undoubtedly gives us a glimpse of an interesting and difficult art, but does not aid in furthering the aim of the book as stated by the editor. The book is full of interest and will be especially enjoyed by chil- dren of about ten or eleven years of age, and portions of it may profitably be read to still younger children. As far as school use is concerned, it would seem of most value if used by the teacher for supplementary lessons on animal life, by. reading aloud por- tions of the book and discussing the story or sketch with the class in such a way as to bring out certain characteristics, of animal life or structure. The second volume under consideration is " Cat Stories." This volume is made up of eighteen short stories and rhymes about cats exclusive of other animals. For this reason the book will not appeal so well to the interest of children as the more varied volume " About Animals." The stories are rather more BOOK REVIEWS 83 entertaining than instructive, but cat ways and characteristics are well described. The book has a peculiar value from a narrative standpoint, and some of the best stories might be read to children in the primary grades with a view to oral reproduction. The stories are well told in simple language, and the facts are inter- esting and appeal to young children. The book is, however, too special to be used as a supplementary reading book. Both books, '' About Animals " and " Cat Stories," are well illustrated with reproductions of photographs and original draw- ings and the paper and print are good. The books are well worthy to be placed in any school library for children of the upper primary and lower grammar grade. Elizabeth Carse. The Charlton School, New York City. Since the above review was set in type four other volumes com- pleting the series have been received : '' Stories of Brave Dogs," " Lion and Tiger Stories," ''Bear Stories" and "Panther Stories." These are in all essentials like the '' Cat Stories " reviewed above, and the same general commendations and criticisms are applicable to them. All the volumes of the series will undoubtedly be well received as books for home reading and for school-libraries. M. A. B. How Nature Study Should be Taught. By Edward F. Bigelow. Introduction by J. P. Gordy ; appendix, " How to Introduce Nature-Study," by H. A. Surface. N. Y., Hinds, Noble & Eldredge. 1904. Pp. 203. $1.00. This series of talks to teachers is not, as the title might suggest, a book of special method — though there is considerable pedagogy in it — but rather is it a plea for the more general and sympa- thetic teaching of the subject. The author was, for eight years, the editor of The Observer; for three years editor of Popular Science, and for the past five years the editor of the department of Nature and Science in St. Nicholas. He is known as a lecturer and is not without experience as a teacher. However, the point of view throughout the book is rather that of the school patron than of the teacher. The author, evidently an ardent nature- lover, is interested in children and desires that nature be por- 84 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 trayed " from the standpoint of the child." He does not tire of insisting upon the distinction between elementary science and nature-study, which, as he sees it, is a distinction between the imparting of scientific knowledge, with the inculcating of habits of scientific thinking, and the development of a love of nature. Personally we are inclined to the belief that scientific method, both on the part of the teacher and eventually on the part of the pupil as well, is inseparate from a satisfactory handling of nature- study. " What I have had in mind," to quote from the opening chapter, " is not a matter of learning nature, but of loving her." To this we are wont to answer : " Yes, but ' even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.' " Later he adds : '' It is nothing less nor more than taking an intelligent interest in the earth and its products." Ay, there is the saving word — intelli- gent. What in the author is a fine sentiment may easily take the form of the rankest sentimentality in a teacher whose loving does not lead to a desire to know. In general, as Professor Gordy says in his introduction, the pedagogy of the book is entirely sound. What at first appear as extravagances are seen to be only the overflow of ardor, and statements which seem extreme are later modified. That a dis- tinction must be made between elementary science and nature- study we must heartly agree, but mental activity should be de- manded in one as in the other. With increasing maturity comes a measure of ability to divorce the intellect from the emotions without damage to either. Perhaps our greatest fault as teachers of children lies in our failure to adopt the viewpoint of the pupil. The author makes this very clear, and in urging a more sympathetic interest in the out-door life of the child he has probably given us his most val- uable contribution. '' To overcome the onesidedness of a school limited to mere instruction, nature-study has been introduced as the most valuable field in which to let the child do the telling." Quoting from C. B. Scott : '' More than is the case with other studies, probably, science, or nature-study, deals with the indi- vidual child, and aims to develop each child as an individual." We do not feel quite so comfortable when we read the follow- ing : '' There must be the stock before the graft ; the seed before the plant can develop. Therefore, talk about the attractions of nature and of her beauties, especially of the beauties * * ^\ Ex- BOOK REVIEWS 85 patiate to your pupils on the beauty of nature." Most of us should be cautioned, I fear, before acting upon this advice, for it is dan- gerous ground. The chapter on correlation is good. The world about us is worthy of study in its own right. '' There is danger of correlating nature-study until it is annihilated," yet there are lines of intersec- tion that should be followed into other fields. " Correlate manual training with nature-study interests and see how the whole child- Hfe wakens up. You wake him up to one thing and he is awake to all." The author's sense of humor is not lacking and many of his points are made by the reductio ad absurdum method. The book is written in an interesting style, and will doubtless stimulate many readers to a greater interest in direct study of natural things. Fred L. Charles. Illinois State Normal School, De Kalb, 111. First Principles of Agriculture. By E. S. Gofif and D. D^ Mayne. N. Y., American Book Company. Pp. 248, illustrated, eight colored plates. 80 cents. This little book, intended for use in the rural schools, is another evidence of the growing tendency to emphasize the practical ele- ment in education, to connect the school life of a child with its home life and daily environment. Written as a text-book for " pupils in the upper form of the rural school," it is an endeavor " to make the farm a center of interest and its industries, its economies, and its science the subjects of thought and study." The book consists of a series of brief reading lessons on soils, plants and various horticultural operations, insects, dairying and animal husbandry. The earlier subjects are illustrated by simple experiments, the directions for which are given at the beginning of each lesson, while at the end of each is a summary of the chief points covered. The book is illustrated, containing several appeals to the popular taste in the way of colored plates. For those schools in which a good course in nature-study ex- tending through the earlier years already exists, this book, dealing as a large part of it does with some of the simpler facts of plant and animal life, would seem to be superfluous, since it is not written or arranged in such a way as to be of much use in such an 86 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 extended course. On the other hand, in schools in which a study of these first principles of agriculture is introduced into the last year as an entirely new subject, so condensed a text-book would hardly suffice alone to accomplish its avowed purpose. No at- tempt is made to outline a complete course of study or to give any but the simplest examples of practical work ; many topics are omitted altogether or stated briefly as facts without demonstra- tion. It is difficult to see how the book, taken as reading lessons only, could arouse any very vivid interest in the farm as a subject of thought and study. Supplemented, however, by additional practical work, and in the hands of a trained teacher, it might be very useful as a reading book for those classes in which the economic side of nature-study is emphasized. Ada Watterson. Teachers College, Columbia University. Bird Life Stories. Book 1. By C. M. Weed. Chicago, Rand, McNally & Co. 1904. Pp. 86, 24 three-color plates. 75 cents. This book, which is one of a series of three books now in press, is made up'of condensed and revised selections from descriptions of our common birds by Audobon, Wilson, Nuttall and Bendire — our four most famous writers on birds. The slight revisions and condensations of the original descriptions have been made only where it was necessary to omit matter of no modern or general interest and to shorten sentences so as to make the meaning more clear to pupils of the upper grammar grades, for which the book is intended. Notes on geographical distribution have been added to the description of each bird ; and each account is accompanied by a plate which is excellent in its truthfulness to form and color. The book presents in a most attractive form just such material as a teacher should be glad to place in the hands of the pupils to sup- plement their practical work on birds. Teachers and pupils will eagerly await the appearance of the other two volumes. Anna N. Bigelow. Monarch, the Big Bear. By E. Thompson Seton. N. Y., Scribner's Sons. 1904. This interesting story deserves notice in a journal devoted to the educational aspects of nature-study not because it has any PERIODICAL LITERATURE 8/ close connection with that field ; but because it will undoubtedly be so classed, with others of its kind, in the minds of many people. The book is a typical Thompson-Seton contribution to animal fiction ; and, of course, it has the characteristic prefatory explana- tion that " the intention is to convey the known truth," but the legal phrase '' nothing but the truth " is wisely avoided in an " his- torical novel of Bear life." The author admits that it is not exactly a contribution to pure science. But in spite of all such scientific deficiencies the story will find enthusiastic readers. Chil- dren— small ones and many of larger growth — will never tire of " bear stories " so long as specimens of these interesting animals remain ; and readers who are too old for '' The Three Bears " of the nursery days will enjoy even the unscientific parts of this latest account of bear life seen through a strong and healthy imagina- tion. From the standpoint of fiction '' Monarch " is splendid ; but for real nature-study we prefer the less mighty, but more nat- ural, specimens of the zoological parks. M. A. B. NOTES ON RECENT PAMPHLETS AND MAGAZINE ARTICLES Home Nature-Study Course. In this interesting series of cor- respondence leaflets for teachers conducted by Mrs. Comstock, of Cornell University, five volumes have been completed and No. I of a new series was issued in October, 1904. It contains lessons on Leaf Study ; Seed Distribution — Weeds ; Chipmunk ; Alfalfa or Lucerne. No. 2, December, deals with evergreens ; and among other useful points, it gives simple tables for determining our common cone-bearing trees. The leaflets are free to teachers in New York State who follow the course, ten lessons in a year ; 25 cents per year to subscribers outside of the state. << Beautiful America. '» Under this heading, ]\Ir. J. Horace McFarland, of Harrisburg, Pa., President of the American Civic Association, begins in the Ladies Home Journal for January the second year of a department devoted to beautifying our homes and towns. Leaflets describing the work of the association will be sent to those who apply, enclosing stamp, to the Secretary of the Association, North American Building, Philadelphia. Many 88 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 of the educational and social aims of the organization are in gen- eral terms so similar to those underlying gardening for children that teachers of nature-study who are local directors of children's gardens ought to get into touch with the work of this national society. In a later issue we hope to review some phases of the work of the Civic Association. Garden Magazine. A new periodical with this title appeared last month (Feb.), published by Doubleday, Page & Co., New York. It contains many timely articles and notes of interest to those who make gardens primarily for pleasure. It is attrac- tively illustrated. Monthly. $1.00 per year. Training Teachers at Macdonald Institute. As No. 20 of a series of nature-study papers by Canadian educators, the Ottaz^a Naturalist publishes in the January, 1905, issue (Vol. 18, pp. 193- 196) an article on " Nature-study at the Macdonald Institute," by D. J. Doyle, which gives many interesting facts concerning the work of this new training school. It is of special interest to note that, while recognizing the importance of child-study to the teacher of nature-study, the staff of this school insists upon " placing the students as much as possible in direct contact with nature " by means of field excursions and laboratory study. Report of Children's School Farm. An interesting account of gardening is to be found in a recent pamphlet entitled '' Report of the First Children's School Farm in New York City, originated and conducted by Mrs. Henry Parsons." This report is " printed for distribution in answer to the constant inquiries from all parts of the country concerning the details of the work whose great importance Mrs. Parsons was the first person to demonstrate in the city of New York, with the cooperation of the Park Board." It is a very full and satisfactory account of the gardening work directed in the unimproved part of DeVVitt Clinton Park (Eleventh Avenue and 52d St.) in the summers of 1902, 1903, 1904; and will doubtless be helpfully suggestive to others who conduct such experiments in densely populated regions of our great cities. From the educational standpoint the Children's Farm is in no essential respect different from many gardens which were devel- oped years ago in other cities ; but it is of interest because it is another successful garden developed under very adverse con- ditions. NOTES ON RECENT ARTICLES 89 History of School-Gardens. A pamphlet, free, with the title " Progress of Agricultural Education, 1903," is a recent reprint from the 1903 Annual Report of the office of the Experiment Sta- tions, U. S. Department of Agriculture. It deals with the prog- ress of agricultural education in colleges and in schools of elemen- tary and secondary grade. Ten pages and eight excellent plates of full-page size are devoted to school-gardens, giving a very useful general history and survey of the school-garden movement in all parts of the United States and the insular possessions. A list of elementary books and pamphlets on nature-study and school-gardening, previously published as Circular No. 52, is here reprinted. Some Children's Pets. Under this title a recent bulletin of the Northern State Normal School, Marquette, Mich., outlines some nature-study lessons on common animal pets. The lessons are designed to run through the fall term of the first, third, fifth and seventh grades. There is no apparent reason for the arrangement according to alternate grades ; on the contrary, many schools do similar work best by concentrating in the first and second grades. Rhode Island ^< Nature Guard.'* No. 33, ''Tracks in the Snow," and No. 34, " A Talk about the Weather," No. 35, '' How to Grow Corn," and No. 36, " Seed Travelers," are the latest addi- tions in the interesting correspondence series conducted by Pro- fessor Card of the Rhode Island College. Nature Collections. Bulletin No. 134 (June, 1904) of the On- tario Agricultural College, the second leaflet from Macdonald Institute, gives useful hints on making collections for schools. It was prepared by the late Dr. Muldrew. It gives suggestions for collecting (i) nature notes, (2) living animals and plants, (3) pressed plants and leaves, (4) grains and grasses, (5) seeds and dry fruits, (6) specimens of wood, (7) insects, (8) historical objects. Key to Woody Plants in Winter. A pamphlet with this title has been recently published by K. ]\I. Wiegand and F. W. Fox- worthy of Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. (Price, 25 cents.) It includes the genera of trees and shrubs found wild or in cultiva- tion in the state of New York, but it also applies to the neighbor- ing states. It appears to be a useful supplement to such a book 90 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 as Huntington's " Studies of Trees in Winter" (Boston, Knight & Millet, 1902), which gives good descriptions and illustrations but no key to genera. Tuskegee Institute Leaflets. Teachers' Leaflet No. 2 gives practicable directions for making gardens. An interesting fea- ture is the " Calendar " which gives planting directions by months. Farmers' Leaflet No. 16 deals with cotton. GUIDE TO PERIODICAL LITERATURE a bibliography of the leading magazine articles of inter- est in connection with nature-study January to September, 1904 ARRANGED BY ADA WATTERSON Tutor in Biology, Teachers College, Columbia University [Editorial Note. — This second installment of the bibliography completes the record for the first eight months of the year 1904. It has not been attempted to make a complete bibliography ; but rather to select those articles which appear to be most important and accessible in most public libraries. In the case of periodicals designed for local circula- tion, only articles of exceptional merit will be catalogued. The figures with black face indicate the volume and those following the : refer to the pages. The abbreviations of journal titles and dates are those used in the general indexes to be found in libraries. Readers are requested to inform the compiler concerning any important omissions.] 2. NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS I. GENERAL Bigelow, E. F. (ed.) Nature and science. Dept. in St. Nich. 31. 1904. Nature pedagogy. Dept. in Pop. Educator. 21. 1904. Blight, R. (ed.) Among the plants; garden, field and forest. Cur. Lit. 36. Ja.-Ap. '04. Nature in and out of doors. Cur. Lit. 36. My.-S. '04. (Extracts from various current magazines.) Comstock, Anna B. Nature study. Dept. in Chaut. 39. Ja.-Je. '04. (Lessons on animals and plants.) Weed, C. M. Seasonable nature studies. Serial in Jour, of Educ. (New Eng.). 59. Ap.-My. '04. (Studies of birds and flowers.) II. ANIMALS (GENERAL) Bigelow, E. F. Comfort in cold weather. St. Nich. 31 : 360-2. F. '04. (Winter homes of animals.) WATTERSON] PERIODICAL LITERATURE 9 1 Burroughs, John. Animal individuality. Tnd. 56 : 85-87. Ja. 14, '04. Current misconceptions in natural history. Cent. 67 : 509-17. F. '04. Natural History. Dept. in Outing, beginning Ap. '04. Some natural his- tory doubts and conclusions. Harper. 109 : 360. Ag. '04. What do ani- mals know ? Cent. 68 : 555-63. Ag. '04. Flint, A. Tact and taste in animals. Sci. Am. S. 57 : 23444-5. Ja. 16, '04. How animals detect poison. Sci. Am. S, 57:23751. My. 28, '04. Long, W. J. Animal Individuality. Ind. 56 : 1242-8. Je. 2, '04. Smith, N. A. Children's pets. Kind. Rev. 14. Ja. '04. Invertebrates, Except Insects Brewster, E. T. Root-footed animals. St. Nich. 31 : 552-4. Ap. '04. (Protozoa through the microscope.) Conn, H. W. Jellyfishes. St. Nich. 31 : 963. Ag. '04. Furlong, E. E. Warrior mound-builders. St. Nich. 31 : 651-2. My. '04. (Crayfish.) M'Clure, W. F. Starfish and their injuries. Sci. Am. 90:98. Ja. 30, '04. (Habits and forms.) Miller, E. R. Odd things which live in the sea. Overland. 44:71. Jl. '04. Rogers, J. E. Common shells of the seashore. C'try Life in Amer. 6 : 246-9. Jl. '04. Insects Aaron, S. F. Eflfect of cold on insects. St. Nich. 31 : 362. F. '04. The mosquito. 31 : 648-50. My. '04. Collins, P. Protective resemblance of insects. Sci. Am. S. 57 : 23764-5. Je. 4, '04. Comstock, A. B. Ants. Chaut. 39 : 273-6. My. '04. The bumblebee. 39 : 384. Je. '04. The mourning-cloak. 39 : 76. Mr. '04. Fulda, G. Examples of insect mimicry. Sci. Am. 91 : 219. S. 24, '04. Higginson, T. W. Butterflies in poetry. Atlantic. 93 : 746-54. Je. '04. Howard, L. 0. Mexican cotton-boll weevil. R. of Rs. 29: 188-91. F. '04. Hutchinson, C. E. A trapdoor spider. Sci. Am. 91 : 83. Jl. 30, '04. McCook, H. C. Aeronautic spiders. Harper. 108:905-11. My. '04. In- sect commonwealths. 108 : 554-60. Mr. '04. Tailoring animals. 108 : 453-7. F. '04. The daintiness of ants. 109:604-10. S. '04. The strange cycle of the cicada. 109 : 44-49. Je. '04. Marlatt, C. L. Discovery of the native home of the San Jose scale in Eastern China and the importation of its natural enemy. Pop. Sci. Mo. 65 : 306. Ag. '04. Miller, E. R. American silk-worm moth. Overland. 43:510-11. Je. '04. Snyder, C. D. Do grasshoppers drink? School Science. 4:90-2. My. '04. Spectator. Bee-keeping. Outlook. 76 : 208-10. Ja. 23, 04. 92 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 The bee as an artisan. (Trans, fr. La Nature.) Sci. Am. 91:98. Ag. 6, '04. Winter insects. Sci. Am. 90: 150. F. 20, '04. Lower Vertebrates Burti, V. How a python eats. Sci. Am. 90:31. Ja. 9, '04. Forbes, R. P. Fish of the western sea. Overland. 43 : 176-80. Mr. '04. Knight, C. R. Color in Bermuda waters. Cent. 68 : 595, 603. Ag. '04. (Adaptations of fishes to their surroundings.) Smith, H. M. " As flat as a flounder." St. Nich. 31 : 1032. S. '04. Spaid, A. R. M. Harmless reptile. Sci. Am. 90 : 47. Ja. 16, '04. (Lizards.) Stockton, F. R. Alligator hunting. St. Nich. 31 : 335-40. F. '04. Birds Beasley, W. L. The flamingo and its queer nest. Sci. Am. 91 : 66. Jl. 23, '04. Birds and the farmer. Ind. 56: 1041-2. My. 5, '04. (Economic value.) Burroughs, John. Nature's way. Harper. 109:263. Jl. '04. (Birds' nests.) Comstock, A. B. The brown creeper. Chaut. 38 : 593. F. '04. The chipping sparrow. 39 : 173-5. Ap. '04. White-breasted nuthatch. 38 : 491-3. Ja. '04. Dawson, F. A. Bird walks for children. Harp. B. 38 : 154-62. F. '04. (Field work for small children.) Finley, W. L. Rearing a wren family. St. Nich. 31 : 735-41. Je. '04. Garland, V. A California minstrel (mocking-bird). Overland. 43:118- 20. F. '04. Feathered Californians. 43 : 386-7. My. '04. Gleeson, J. M. The great horned owl. Outlook. 77 : 295-7. Je. 4, '04. The harpy eagle. St. Nich. 31 : 832-3. Jl. '04. Hawson, F. E. When the birds were our guests. St. Nich. 31 : 906. Ag. '04. Herrick, F. H. Modern scientific methods of nature-study. Harp. W. 48:53^ 57-^- Ja. '04. (Photographing birds.) Hoar, G. F. The birds' petition. Educ. Gaz. 20:145. My. '04. (Peti- tion to Mass. State Legislature for protection of birds.) Job, H. K. Great Cuthbert rookery. Outing. 43 : 583-90. F. '04. On lonely Bird Key. 44 : 231-8. My. '04. Oldys, H. Basket of chips. Atlantic. 93:219-25. F. '04. (Bird song.) Palmer, F. H. Song-sparrow. Educ. 24:500. Ap. '04. (Birds in poetry.) Rogers, C. E. Our friends, the birds. Ed. Gaz. 20: 144. My. '04. Sandys, E. Robbing birds' nests. Outing. 44 : 387. Je. '04. Sharp, D. L. A crazy flicker. St. Nich. 31 : 554-5- Ap. '04. Smith, T. C. Song-forms of the thrush. Atlantic. 93 : 777-86. Je. '04- watterson] periodical LITERATURE 93 Spectator. Food of birds. Outlook. 76 : 158-60. Ja. '04, Stewart, J. A. Arbor and bird day exercises. Jour, of Educ. 59:135. Mr. 3, '04. Scott, W. E. D. Blue jays. Outlook. 77:45. My. 7, '04. W., G. E. New study of bird life. Sci. Am. 90:22-23. Ja. 9, '04. (Care of wild birds in winter.) Wolcott, R. H. Outline of bird study. Jour, of Educ. 59 : 245, 278. Ap, 21, My. 5, '04. Van Dyke, T. S. When the graywings came. Outing. 43 : 667-72. Mr. '04. Mammals Beard, J. C. Snow houses of the seal and of the bear. St. Nich. 31 : 210-11. Ja. '04. Boyden, A. C. Domestic animals. Squirrels and rabbits. Perry Mag. 6 : 225. Ja. '04. Beasts of burden. 6 : 305. Mr. '04. Chapman, A. Pariah of the skyline. Outing. 44:131-8. My. '04. (Coyote.) Eastman, C. A. Gray chieftain. Harper. 108:882-7. My. '04. (Story of a Bighorn ram.) Oilman, C. Monkeys. Jour, of Educ. 59:38, 54, 87. Ja. 21, 28, F. 11, '04. The elephant. 59:118, 182. F. 25, Mr. 24, '04. Gleeson, J. M. " Bhalu " — the Indian jungle bear. St. Nich. 31 : 712. Je. '04. Grizzly bear. 31 : 408-9. Mr. '04. The coyote. 31 : 606-7. My. '04. Harcourt, H. Stories of my pets. St. Nich. 31 : 898. Ag. '04. Humphreys, P. W. Animal ship. St. Nich. 31 : 304-9. F. '04. (Wild animals from Africa.) Lydekker, R. How baby bats are nursed. (Abstract.) Sci. Am. 90: 192. Mr. '04. McGrath, P. T. Wonderful whale-hunting by steam. Cosm. 37 : 48-56. ' My. '04. Rolker, A. W. Wild-animal surgeon and his patients. McClure. 22 : 235-44. Ja- '04. The rogues of a Zoo. 23 : 212. My. '04. Scott, W. E. D. My dog Grouse. Outlook. 77 : 304. Je. 4, '04. Seton, E. T. The master-plowman of the West. [Gophers as soil- formers.] Century. 68: 300-307. Je. '04. Monarch, the grizzly. Ladies' H. J. 21 : 5-6. F. '04. Little Warhorse : the story of a Jack-rabbit. Ladies' H. J. 21 : 13-14. Je. '04. Smith, H. M. Largest animals. (Whales.) St. Nich. 31:456-9. Mr. '04. Spectator. Bloodhounds; Outlook. 76 : 776-8. Ap. 2, 1904. Swindlehurst, F. Day with the Eskimo seal hunters. World's Work. 7:4331-5- Ja- '04. Whitney, C. Jin Abu finds an elephant. Outing. 43 : 558-71. F. '04. HL PLANTS (GENERAL) Anderson, M. P. The protection of our native plants. Plant World. 7 : 123-29. My. '04. 94 ^"^^ NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2. march, 1905 Apgar, E. A. Reproduction in plants. Harper. 108 : 713-20. Ap. '04. Broadhurst, Jean. The protection of our native plants. Plant World. 7 : 152-54- Je. '04. Comstock, A. B. Food stored in seeds. Chaut. 38 : 493-6. Ja. '04. Sugar bush. 38 : 590. F. '04. The clovers. 39 : 384-90. Je. '04. The onion. 39 : 276. My. '04. The potato study. 39 : 76. Mr. '04. The skunk cabbage. 39:76. Mr. '04. The trilliums. 39:173-5- Ap. '04. French, F. Nature's jewel caskets. Outing. 43:409-13. Ja. '04. (Seed dispersal.) Gardner, H. G. Creating new fruits. Cosm. 37 : 262. Jl. '04. (Work of Dept. of Agric.) Harwood, W. S. A maker of new plants and fruits. Scrib. 36 : 49-55. Jl. '04. MacFarland, J. H. Nut-bearing trees. Outlook. 76 : 597-607. Mr. 5, '04. Some American trees. 76 : 817-27. Ap. 2, '04. Mackenzie, M. Open secrets. Kindergarten Review. 14. Ja. '04. (Trees in winter.) Familiar trees and their flowers. 14. Mr. '04. Shreve, F. Some plants which entrap insects. Pop. Sci. Mo. 65 : 417- 31. S. '04. Forestry Planting forests. Ind. 56 : 392-4. F. 18, '04. Forest reserve for New England. Harp. W. 48 : 228-9. F- I3j 'o4- Munn, M. J. Great industries of the United States. HI. Lumber. Cosm. 37:437-450. Ag. '04. Perceval, H. Maple sugaring in the northern woods. Outing. 44 : 36- 44. Ap. '04. Pinchot, Gifford. The new hope for the West. Cent. 68:309-312. Je. '04. (Forestry reserves in the West.) Life of a forest. Sci. Am. S. 57:23766-7. Je. 4, '04. Roosevelt, Theodore. Our forest policy. (Address to Soc. of Amer. Foresters, Mr. 27, '03.) Extracts in Plant World. 7: 8-1 1. Ja. '04. Vandevoort, L. Uncle Sam's foresters. Outing. 43 : 629-32. Mr. '04. (Field work of Div. of Forestry.) 3. AGRICULTURE, INCLUDING GARDENING Bailey, L. H. A children's garden. Amer. Jour, of Educ. 37 : 297-8. Ap. '04. Bennett, H. C. School gardens in great cities. R. of Rs. 29 : 439-43. Ap. '04. Bigelow, E. F. An egg-shell garden. St. Nich. 31 : 1035. S. '04. Plants as pets. School Science. 4 : 87-90. My. '04. Bowles, J. M. A flower-garden for every child. World's Work. 8 : 4799-4803. My. '04. (Home Gardening Assoc, of Cleveland.) Davenport, E. Study of Agriculture. Dept. in School News. 17. '04. watterson] periodical LITERATURE 95 Davis, F. My first greenhouse. Ind. 56: 1378-81. Je. 16, '04. Falconer, W. Gardening department in Ladies' H. Jour. 21. '04. Gar- dener's midsummer calendar; insecticides. 21:26. Jl. '04, Galloway, B. T. Farming under glass. World's Work. 7 : 4583-8. Mr. '04. Profits of garden and orchard. 7 : 4419-24. F. '04. Hay, W. P. A miniature conservatory in a city home. C'ntry Life in Amer. 5:249. Ja. '04. (Suggestions useful for schoolroom.) Knapp, G. R. Winter house plants. Harp. B. 38 : 79-81, 207-8. Ja., F. '04. Knowlton, F. H. (ed.) Garden and greenhouse. Dept. in Plant World. 7. '04. Laidlaw, M. C. School gardens. Kind. Rev. 15:12-17. S. '04. Macleod, Ward. Ferns within doors and without. Delin. 63 : 330-2. F. '04. Dept. in Delineator. 63. '04. Moore, G. T. Bacteria and the nitrogen problem. Sci. Am. S. 57 : 23508-10. F. 13, '04. Paine, A. B. Little garden calendar. Dept. for children in Delin. 63. '04. Richards, R. Bog plants. New Eng. M. 30:419-23. Je. '04. (Plants which could be transferred to school-gardens.) Shaw, Adele M, Common-sense country schools. World's Work. 8:4883-95. Je. '04. (School grounds.) The ideal schools of Menomo- nie. World's Work. 7:4540-4553. Mr. '04. (School gardens.) Stableton, J. K. How school gardens are carried on. School and Home Educ. 23 : 308. Ap. '04. Winter preparation for school gardening. 23 : 216. F. '04. Sutherland, A. Beauty for ashes. Delin. 63 : 648-9. Ap. '04. (Vacant Lots Cultivation Assoc, work in Phila.) Weed, C. M. (ed.) The home garden. Dept. in House Beautiful. 15. '04. Plant food from the air. Sci. Am. S. 57:23413. Ja. 2, '04. (Nitrogen problem.) Scientific basis of cheese-making. Pop. Sci. IMo. 64 : 383-4. F. '04. 4. GEOGRAPHICAL NATURE-STUDY Burrows, A. T. Cyclones, tornadoes and hurricanes. St. Nich. 31 : 949. Ag. '04. Fairbanks, H. W. Something about rock salt. St. Nich. 31 : 841. Jl. '04. Meteorology for little folks. Amer. Jour, of Educ. 37 : 241-2. Mr. '04. Meyers, I. B. Elementary field work. Elem. Sch. Teacher. 4: 312. (Physiographic work, including some ecology.) Wygant, E. A. Work with minerals for little children. Ele. Sch. Teacher. 5 : 36-49. S. '04. (Lessons given in Univ. of Chicago School of Education.) 96 THE NATURE-STUDY REVIEW [i, 2, march, 1905 5. PHYSICAL NATURE-STUDY - Brewster, E. T. Radium. St. Nich. 31 : 746-8. Je. '04. Culler, J. A. Experiments with the pendnkim. Reprint in Amer. Jour, of Ediic. 37 : 283. Ap. '04. Woodhull, J. F. Physical nature-study. Sch. Jour. 68. Ja. 9, Mr. 12, '04. Physical nature-study. Sound. Jour, of Educ. 59 : 70, 102. F. 4, 18, '04. NEWS NOTES Conference on Nature-Study. Under the auspices of the Seminary for the the Study of Special Problems in Education, a conference on nature- study in the elementary schools, with especial reference to the study of agriculture, was held at the University of CaHfornia, December loth. Resokitions were proposed relating to the encouragement of such studies through legislative provision for a Central Bureau of Information, for special training of teachers and supervisors, and for the appointment of supervisors to act as deputy county superintendents of schools. Appro- priate bills will be presented to the legislature. Garden Seeds. The Home Gardening Association, 369 St. Clair St., Cleveland, Ohio, is extending its work of furnishing seeds at one cent a packet to schools and other organizations outside of the city. When this note reaches readers it may be too late to obtain seeds for this season, but those interested should send a two-cent stamp for circulars which explain the methods of carrying on this important work. Fuller accounts of the work will be found in the illustrated annual report for 1904; price 25 cents. Dean of Macdonald Institute. To this position, made vacant by the death of Dr. Muldrew, Professor S. B. McCready, science master in the Collegiate Institute of London, Ontario, has been appointed. Chicago School-Gardens. On September 10, 1904, the 250 principals of the schools of Chicago decided to beautify their schools by planting trees, shrubs and vines, and by establishing flower gardens in the schoolyards and window-boxes in the schoolrooms. The Board of Education will be called upon only to provide the soil, the work will be done by teachers and pupils. Philadelphia School-Gardens. In May, 1904, the city council appro- priated the sum of $3,500 to establish and maintain school-gardens in that city from May 15 to October 15. The work was in charge of the Edu- cational League, and the gardens were superintended by Miss H. C. Bennett. Summer Courses for Teachers of Nature-Study. Circulars or letters giving information are wanted for use in preparing the " News Notes " for the May number of The Review. The date of publication of this journal is planned for the 20th of January, March, May, etc. NEW BOOKS RECEIVED House, Garden and Field. A collection of short nature studies. By L. C. Miall. London ; Arnold (N, Y., Longmans, Green). 1904. Pp. 316, figs. 57. ;^2.oo. New Elementary Agriculture. An elementary text-book for rural schools. By C. E, Bessey, L. Bruner, G. D. Swezey. Lincoln, Neb, ; University Pub. Co. 1904. Pp. 194, figs. 60. 75 cents. Organic Evolution. By M. M.^Metcalf. N. Y. ; Macmillan. 1904, Pp. 204, loi full-page plates, 50 figs. ^2,50. (One of the best books for general readers who want an introduction to the subject. ) A Health Primer. By W. M. Coleman, N. Y., Macmillan, 1904, First Book in Hygiene, and Graded Lessons in Hygiene. By W, O. Krohn, N. Y. ; Appletons, 1904, Mary's Garden and How it Grew. By Frances Duncan. N. Y. ; Century Co. 1904. Pp. 261, illustrated. ^1.25. (Simple directions for gardening and in- formation about plants and their life, in story form, for children between five and ten years.) Simplex Nets and Traps Cheap enough for every child to have them. Good enough for professional use. Every Teacher and every naturalist should know about them. Send for illustrated price list to THE SIMPLEX NET CO., Lake Forest, 111. \%7HfZtHorT ''A WOMAN^S HARDY GARDEN '^ Mrs. Ely's Another Hardy Garden Book ^ustreadsi. Illustrated, Cloth, $L75 net {postage 13c.) MRS ELY'S new book tells simply of the chapteron lilies and iris, their varieties, their peri- raising of V getables and the cultivation of ods of blooming and their culture, giving some at- fruits for the home garden It gives instructions tention also to water lilies and other aquatics, for transplanting, not only trees, but the shrubs. The chapters on Spring and Autumn work in the flowers, and vines from woods and meadowlands flower garden afford full and precise directions for for an attractive "wild garden." There is a long all that is to be done at those seasons. OF THE EARIIER BOOK Mrs, Ely's A Woman^s Hardy Garden Now in its Sixth Edition, Cloth, Si. 75 net (postage I3c. ) Mrs. Alice Morse Earle wrote in an extended review in the Dial : " Let us sigh with gratitude and read the volume with delight For here it all is, — what we should plant, and when we should plant it ; how to care for it after it is planted and growing ; what to do if does not grow and blossom ; what will blos- som, and when it will blossom, and what the blossoms will be . . It is a good book, a wholesome book." THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, Publishers, 64-66 Fifth Ave., N. Y. UNRIVALED NATURE BOOKS NATURE STUDY AND LIFE By CLIFTON F. HODGE, Assistant Professor of Physiology and Neurology) in Clark Uni