. I MMMMMjKMasa3B^asanasaca«u rrrrrr i-* uperrrrrrr rr_rrrrr? mwrnrrrr r rr* rrrrrn, Brrrrrti -rrrrn1 44 Intermix/Education In The New Town: 1970 The educational facilities for Robert Venturi's new town were based on a program prepared by Carol Lubin and Ronald Haase, which used libraries as the backbone of the educational system. Electronic technology was utilized to pipe information into many decentralized education nodes and education was available to every resident of a new town, on a 24-hour per day basis. Communicating systems can enrich every area of life, and education thus can take place in the home, in the factory, in the neighborhood, anywhere. In his scheme for a new town, Venturi placed educational facilities along a central strip which has all the conventional elements of existing American city landscapes. The strip is lined with mini-structures easily adaptable to changing needs of the system, and is dotted with billboards and signs promoting education in the same manner in which commodities are promoted. A Meeting room Up to 100 persons for block meetings, etc. B Work room can be adapted for music practice or arts and crafts, etc. C Lounge D Utility core E Computer based learning carrels are located within utility core and can be coin operated Facilities could be used at any hour by individuals or families who do not want to work by themselves in their own home and do not want to go to the neighborhood center for some reason. Industrial service stations which are similar in program but less architectural are plugged within each plant. Neighborhood service stations also contain child care facilities. Robert Venturi's new town has four distinct facilities for the learner: 1. The Educational Service Station is located on street corners within individual neighborhoods, and is planned to serve clusters of about 40 houses. This "service station" has connections for television and other facilities to assist persons who wish to study outside of their home but do not wish to travel to one of the larger centers listed below. The service stations are open day and night. SERVICE STATIONS serving clusters of 40± families 2. The Neighborhood Learning Resources Center, with facilities for non-graded education through the conventional boundaries of the second grade, is provided for each neighborhood of about 500 families. The Center has facilities for adult classes, for community meetings, for health care extension programs, and for day and night care of children so that their parents may participate in programs of interest to them. NEIGHBORHOOD LEARNING RESOURCES CENTER F Child care center Day and night nursery facilities for a maximum of 12 small children G Outdoor play area H Semi-sheltered play pavillion I Recreation and crafts areas J TPC: Teachers' planning and conference room K Serving kitchen Food supplied from town LRC L Entrance M Adm. N T. O Gallery P Medium alcoves Q Big alcoves R Resources center Reading visual and auditory equipment areas contain spaces for the individual as well as the group S Individual carrels for resource area to be used by adults as well as students T Resource check-in area U Plug-in capacity for mobile resources V Computer-assisted learning carrels for 1 to 3 students W Seminar type discussion spaces can also be used by the community for social, political, or religious assembly 500 families/neighborhood 1500-2000 residents 150 children, grades N/K-2 (x, 75 simultaneous enrollment factor = 120±) 32 46 (Continuation) Intermix/Education In The NewTown:1970 3. The Town Learning Resources Center, provided for each township of 12,000 residents, has facilities for ungraded learning in what would conventionally be grades three through eight. This Center also houses facilities for adult education, and has some facilities for younger age levels. In addition, there are extensive facilities for community recreation, entertainment, and for the arts. A Dispensing kitchen Plug-in capacity for mobile i E TPC: teachers' planning and conference room F Gallery G Big and medium alcoves H Niches I Well J Education arcade - open 24 hours computer assisted adult reading listening alcoves Possibly coin opearted or leased weekly or monthly TOWN LEARNING RESOURCES CENTER 3000 families 10,000 - 12,000 residents 1800 students, grades 3-8 (x.75 simultaneous enrollment factor = 1350) 32 UL Computer assisted student reading • listening alcoves for 1, 2. or 3 students (50% of all learning space) grouped to allow seminar discussions of 12-15 (25%) or large groups of 50-60 (25%) Computer devices 1) allow learning at student's own pace 2) porvide access to vast information retrieval systems 3) reflect the thinking of programmers who are experts in their fields 4) possess inherent instantaneous self-correcting mechanisms that eliminate the 'homework return gap' To physical education center/ health center and theater located in town park and recreation area Q Open R Service, parking R Service for shops T Main Street 2 Lanes V On street parking W Small shops, accessible both sides X Commercial strip Contains reception storage, distribution and work space for resource materials and device (books, A. v., TV. and computer) Additional carrels can accommodate open enrollment N/K-2, a facility which serves as a hedge against possible social or economic segregatio patterns and as a specialized facility for advanced or handicapped students at these grade levels. 48 (Continuation) Intermix/Education In The New Town:1970 4. For the complete town — which is composed of eleven townships of about 20,000 residents each, there are two Senior Learning Resources Centers, which provide facilities for studies at the high school level. One Center specializes in arts and humanities, and the other in science and technology, yet students in either school may take courses from the other school by means of television. In addition to the above facilities, there are also educational nodes located within industrial concerns so that employees may utilize work breaks to pursue their studies if they wish. SENIOR LEARNING RESOURCES CENTER AND CITY FACILITIES 20,000 families 75,000 residents 16,000 students, grades 9-12 (x.75 simultaneous enrollment factor = 12,000 students) accommodated in two high schools of 6000 students each (one of which is shown above) 2000 SCALE Town loop Service road 4 lane elevated thruway Plug-in area Parking School busses School busses from all four sur- rounding neighborhoods plus town Flexible zone: Green buffer Commercial Institutional Parking Typical sub-school for 1500 students divided into four houses of 375 students. The houses each have their own control and distribution area tied into central resources and devices. A special theater seating groups of 250 to 1500 will be provided in each SLRC. In the science high school, the theater will be media-oriented, serving as a 'planetarium'. In the arts and humanities high school, the theater will be more performer oriented, serving as a concert hall and drama auditorium. Commercial also including work areas and data processing centers where projects for science/math, arts/industry, and communications (music, drama, journalism, languages, etc.) can be VIEWED FROM THE STREET Computer assister learning elements can receive information from programming centers located in large cities or major universities besides retrieval from the Media City Information Storage and Distribution Center. Commercial with student commons facilities which include dining, social, exhibit, activity, and shopping spaces Commercial Civic and big commercial Sub-school A Sub-school B Sub-school C Sub-school D Physical education center Participation, rather than spectator oriented Performing center Motel Theater NLRC TLRC 50 (Continuation) Intermix/Education In The New Town: 1970 Strip Commercial Gridiron Villi Ridicule ciam Mini-Structure Meol-Structire SCALE TOWN PLAN In Robert Venturi's plan for a new education- oriented town, there is one Town Learning Resource Center for each township of 12,000 residents, six Neighborhood Learning Resource Centers, and a Neighborhood Educational "Service Station" for each cluster of forty families. 52 (Continuation) Intermix/Education In The New Town: 1970 The new town will accommodate some 120,000 residents. An interesting feature of the planning for this town is that the freeway system runs directly through the center of the town. Facilities for transportation, commerce and education are thus irreversibly intermixed along the central strip. 6 LANE MEDIA FREEWAY MIDDLE PATUXENT RIVER Ci CITY LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER CITY LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER Vj1 ^- ' ROCKY GORGE RESERVOIR SITE PLAN 12,000 POPULATION MEDIA POPULATION 150,000 1 TOWN LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER 6 NEIGHBORHOOD LEARNING RESOURCE CENTERS NORTH PATUXENT RIVER The generally-deplored billboard can be used as a tool for education by placing the messages of education in the path of the public. The learning centers are parallel mini-versions of the out-of-doors strip. 54 (Continuation) Intermix/Education In The New Town: 1970 The learning centers are parallel mini-versions of the out-of-doors strip. Learning centers are always connected because they are within the Educational-Commercial strip. A commercial educational strip arrangement for a new town provides a constantly diverting route for the pedestrian and the motorist. Rather than denying the existence of and the necessity for the freeway and the attendant jumble of buildings and automobiles, architect Robert Venturi mingles education facilities directly with those for commerce — along a town-bisecting freeway — and creates a varied smorgasbord of attractions to compete for the attention of the pedestrian or motorist learner. 56 Conclusion At the conclusion of the Rice Design Fete's twelve days of intensive research, many questions remained unanswered. Among them: Can individual motivation and initiative for independent study be assumed? Can social involvement be achieved with a highly individualized program for education? In what manner may a system of study be provided for use in the home? Will industry assume its share of responsibility in proposed new education systems? We are convinced that answers to the foregoing may be found in the new towns of today and tomorrow. It is our conviction, furthermore, based on findings of Rice Design Fete IV, that: New Towns need not be fettered to the drab conventions of traditional forms of education . . . New Towns can be living laboratories for advance in education. . . New Towns can offer exciting prospects: Education for LIFE . . . Education for GROWTH . . . Education which encompasses communities . . . Spans lifetimes . . . And betters each individual resident. New education, in brief, will be characterized by two major changes: 1. TECHNOLOGY: Proposals in the Design Fete relied upon educational technology, urban planning technology, building technology, and organizational technology. Every applicable form of technology was harnessed to provide total education for the resident of the new town. It became evident that transportation will play a major role in education solutions for the future — as it did in solutions to New Town problems. New aspects involved, first, the transportation of the learners to the educational facility (as in the case of the drive-in information bank), and, second, the transportation of educational facilities to the people (as in the case of the traveling bus with its programmed courses.) 2. INTERMIX: As technology makes significant changes in education, it follows that new forms of schools will evolve. Education as formalized programs neatly docketed within set hours will be replaced by social and educational restructuring with facilities available on a 24-hour basis, on the street corner, in telephone booths, in the home, within industry, in libraries, in private automobiles. The walls between learning and life will vanish. And the schoolhouse will disappear — or linger as a memorial to pre-electronic learning. William Cannady, AIA Director, Rice Design Fete IV School of Architecture Rice University 57 Design Fete Participants Charles Colbert, FAIA, Architect and Planner, New Orleans, Louisiana Students: Ronald Cox (Texas A and M University), Peter Eichenlaub (University of Houston) James Farrar (University of Arkansas), Roy Lowey-Ball (Rice University) Bill Merriman (Rice University), Hans Rott (Rice University) Paul Kennon, AIA, Associate Director, Rice University School of Architecture, Houston, Texas Students: Davis Chauviere (Texas A and M University), Joe Champeaux (Rice University) Grant Fehr (Rice University), Bill Longfellow (University of Texas), Charles Lord (Tulane University) Joe Milton (Rice University), Jeffry Ryan (Rice University) 58 (Continuation) Design Fete Participants Cedric Price, MA AA, Dip. ARIBAI London, England Students: Thomas Burke (University of Houston), James Gwin (Rice University), Jack Kemp (University of California), Carl Landow (Rice University), Bill Martin (University of Tennessee), Bob Timme (Rice University) UUitn &t£%*Za^ Niklaus Morganthaler, Architect, Atelier 5, Berne, Switzerland; Students: George Emmons (Rice University) Thomas Forman (University of Illinois), Doug Harvey (Rice University), Bruce Levine, (Rice University), Guy Rollins (Rice University), Thomas Simpson (University of Tennessee) Thomas Vreeland, AIA, Chairman, Department of " Architecture, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Students: David Colby (Rice University) Doss Mabe (Rice University), Patrick McClernon (University of New Mexico), Dan McGown (Rice University), Trenton Wann (University of Texas) Robert Venturi, AIA, Venturi and Rauch, Philadelphia, >• Pennsylvania; Students: Phil Belanger (Rice University) Paul Farmer (Rice University), Albert Filoni (Harvard University), Harry Quffee (Rice University), Danny Samuels (Rice University), Marvin Rosenman (Columbia University) 60/Research Participants CONSULTANTS AND PROGRAM SPECIALISTS Architectural Programming: William M. Pena, AIA, Caudill Rowlett Scott, Architects Planners Engineers, Houston, Texas, and New York, N.Y.; Ben H. Evans, AIA, Director of Research Programs, The American Institute of Architects, The Octagon, Washington, D.C. Delineations: Walter Bell, AIA, Architect, Houston, Texas; Franklin D. Lawyer, Norman Hoover, and David Griffin, Caudill Rowlett Scott, Architects Planners Engineers, Houston, Texas and New York, N.Y.; O. Jack Mitchell, Associate Professor, Anderson Todd, Professor, School of Architecture, Rice University, Houston, Texas Environmental Medicine: Lee E. Farr, M.D., Professor of Nuclear and Environmental Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Hospital, Houston, Texas Programming: Joseph Bechard, Principal, Troy High School, Troy, Michigan; Eugene Howard, Charles F. Kettering Foundation, Dayton, Ohio Psychology: Edwin P. Willems, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, Texas Sociology: Mary Ellen Goodman, Ph.D., Department of Sociology, Rice University, Houston, Texas Structures: Nat W. Krahl, Ph.D., School of Architecture, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Kenneth Zimmerman, Walter P. Moore and Associates, Engineers, Houston, Texas Urban Design: Jerzy Soltan, Chairman, School of Architecture, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts ADVISERS Harold B. Gores, President, Educational Facilities Laboratories, Inc., 477 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y.; Jonathan King, Vice-President and Treasurer, Educational Facilities Laboratories, Inc., 477 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y.; William W. Caudill, FAIA, Caudill Rowlett Scott, Architects Planners Engineers, 3636 Richmond Avenue, Houston, Texas EDUCATORS Albert A. Canfield, Ed.D., Vice-President, Oakland Community College, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan; Ronald W. Haase, AIA, Architect, New York, New York; Dorothy M. Knoell, Programmer, State University of New York, Washington, D.C; Carol Ft. Lubin, Programmer, Simon Enterprises, Inc., New York, New York; Judith P. Ruchkin, Programmer, School of Education, College of the City of New York, New York, New York; Cyril G. Sargent, Ed.D., Professor of Education, College of the City of New York, New York, N.Y.; John E. Tirrell, Ph.D., President, Oakland Community College, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan RESEARCH STAFF Editor, William Cannady, AIA Associate Editor, Ann Mohler Art Director, Charles Schorre Visual Communications, Frederick Gardner and Robert Sobel, AIA Photography, Laurin McCracken and Douglas Peel \ III