Itforma3nfittlulg of ufcdjttologg slWN institute of LIBRARY LJNMKSiTY ®F SAWTA CHUZ cumuli y BIOLOGY LIBRARY orni? lasiitute of Technololy 14 -- DAYS A NEW TYPE OF HER BRACHYPHALANGY I BY OTTO L. MOHR AND CHR. WRIEDT 24950 ^Vv^ - VI ; PUBLISHED BY THE CAKNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON, 1919 V r APR 3 • 1929 v CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON PUBLICATION No. 295 PAPER No. 31 OF THE STATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION AT COLD SPRING HARBOR, NEW YORK / PRESS OF GIBSON BROTHERS, INC. WASHINGTON, D. C. CONTENTS. PAGE I. Introduction 5- 7 II. Review of literature 8-13 III. Method of examination 14-15 IV. General description of the brachyphalangy studied 16-19 V. Family record 20-43 VI. Hereditary type of the character studied 44-61 1. General discussion 44-49 2. The ratio between affected and normal individuals 49-50 3. The B-type and the B!-type 51-61 VII. Summary 61-62 VIII. List of literature . . 63-64 QH A NEW TYPE OF HEEEDITAEY BKACHYPHALAGNY IN MAN, I. INTRODUCTION. No other field in biology has within recent years yielded such far- reaching and important results as the field of genetic work. Thanks to the introduction of analytical experimentation, one after another of the central problems in natural science has been solved or brought near to a solution — problems which after so many vain attempts seemed almost beyond the reach of ordinary scientific analysis. The progress has been so considerable that one of the most prominent workers in this field, T. H. Morgan, in 1916 felt justified in stating: "I venture the opinion that the problem of heredity has been solved." It scarcely needs to be pointed out that the broad general significance of the hereditary phenomena makes it urgently necessary to determine whether the results obtained through experimental work with animals and plants may be applied to the inheritance of human characters. There was a priori no reason to doubt that this would prove to be the case, and several human characters, physiological as well as patho- logical, have been shown to be inherited in a way fully accordant with the laws established through experimental genetic work. Human material, however, presents several serious obstacles for genetic analysis. Not only the principal handicap involved in the lack of experiments, but also other special features make man a very poor subject for work in heredity. The number of individuals within each family is very small; intermarriage is comparatively rare; the interval of tune between the generations is very long; and the charac- ters studied are rarely amenable to accurate measurements. Only the application of the most general hereditary laws, those of Mendelian inheritance and of sex-linked inheritance, has accordingly so far been possible with human material. Still, the experimental work has shown that even though these laws form the basis of all our knowledge of heredity, then* manifestation is far more complicated than it would seem from many earlier investigations, where the case seemed closed when it was possible to demonstrate the occurrence of Mendelian segregation. In spite of the difficulties and the incompleteness of the data which are due to the nature of this material, it is nevertheless desirable, whenever human characters are observed which are accessible for genetic analysis, to carry out this analysis and determine, if possible, whether or not the principles established through experimental work may be extended so as to include human material. The hereditary character which forms the subject of the following investigation is a symmetrical shortness of a single (the second) 6 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. phalanx of the second fingers and toes. This character is inherited within a Norwegian family, some members of which have emigrated to North America. Our attention was called to the material by Dr. Frimann Koren, of Christiania, who observed the malformation in some members of the family 15 years ago. Dr. Frimann Koren, who intended to study the inheritance of the character, showed foresight in securing not only ordinary photographs but also radiographs and casts of the hands of four affected members, viz, a father and three of his sons. Being prevented from carrying out the investigation himself , he later very generously permitted us to do it, and at the same time he kindly transferred to us the material he had already collected. We wish to express to him our most sincere thanks for this courtesy. Through the interested and intelligent cooperation of two members of the family we have since been able to gather detailed information about the pedigree for six generations, an investigation that has been greatly facilitated by the fact that the family owns an old " family book" with elaborate data concerning each member of the earliest three generations dealt with in this paper. The photographs of the malformation cover five generations, the radiographs four. The material here studied may be regarded as especially favorable because the brachyphalangy is always restricted to a single and the same phalanx, and a numerical expression for the character can be obtained by measuring from the radiographs the long axis of the affected phalanx. These data have made possible the analysis of two distinctly different somatic types under which the brachyphalangy manifests itself. A suggestion is given for an explanation of these types on a genetic basis. Much attention is paid in the investigation to this special point. The family studied includes a case of intermarriage, giving rise to an individual that is interpreted as homozygous for brachyphalangy. This case reveals features of special interest from a medical point of view. As to the name used in this paper to characterize the abnormality, the following might be mentioned: Farabee, when he described the anomaly often spoken of later as "Farabee's disease," used the name hypophalangia, or diminution in the number of phalanges (1905). Drinkwater, in his papers dealing with the same subject, uses the term of the old anatomists brachydactyly, which is still generally adopted in pathological anatomy and clinics. According to Drinkwater, the fin- gers are in " brachydactyly reduced to about half the normal length" (1915). As a special type he separates " minor brachydactyly." The fingers are here "intermediate in length between these very short ones and the fingers of average normal individuals" (1915). INTRODUCTION. 7 Drinkwater's terms are found in most of the text books, but it will be seen from the citations given that their definition is rather vague. Moreover, the radiographs show that not the fingers and toes as a whole, but quite definite phalanges, are shortened. It is therefore preferable to abandon these inadequate terms and use the precise name "brachyphalangy" earlier proposed by Pfitzner. In our case it is quite necessary to use the latter term because the malformation can not be characterized by one or the other name as outlined by Drink- water's definition, both degrees of shortening occurring within the family studied. The term brachyphalangy has furthermore the advan- tage of covering all the numerous types of analogous malformations to which neither of the two terms of Drinkwater can justly be applied. During the course of the investigation the authors have become indebted to several persons who have rendered valuable assistance in providing radiographs and photographs, and our most sincere thanks are tendered to Dr. Heyerdahl, of Rigshospitalets Rontgenavdeling, Christiania; Dr. P. F. Hoist, of Rigshospitalet,Christiania; Dr. Olav Hanssen, Bergens kommunale sygehus; Dr. Paus, Lindboe's Klinik, Christiania; Dr. Wood, of the Cancer Laboratory, Columbia Univer- sity, New York; Mr. A. F. Huettner, New York; and Dr. Hektoen, of the John McCormick Institute, Chicago. We are similarly indebted to the medical students Kreyberg, Waaler, and Lie. One of the authors, Mohr, who carried out the composition of this paper while working in the laboratory of Dr. T. H. Morgan, at Colum- bia University, wishes to express his most sincere thanks to Dr. Morgan for his help and encouragement in many ways as well as for the hos- pitality and facilities enjoyed during the work. He also takes the opportunity of acknowledging his large indebtedness to Dr. Bridges and Dr. Sturtevant for their assistance. Dr. Sturtevant, in addition, took the burden of correcting the English text, a kindness for which the authors feel specially and sincerely thankful. The collection of radiographs and photographs of members of the family, often living in distant communities, was made possible through a grant awarded by Nansenfondet, Christiania. An opportunity of including some of the American members of the family in the present investigation was obtained when one of the authors obtained a fellow- ship of the American-Scandinavian Foundation. 8 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE. After the rediscovery of Mendel's work it was not long until evidence was presented to the effect that several human characters are inherited in a way consistent with the Mendelian laws. Among the clearest cases are, as is well known, several malformations affecting the hands and feet, such as adactyly, monodactyly, hypodactyly, syndactyly, and polydactyly; hypophalangy, brachyphalangy, hyperphalangy, and ankylosis of phalanges, separately or in different combinations. They all behave as dominant characters; and as the standard case, Far- abee's fundamental investigation of a brachyphalangous (by him described as hypophalangous) family will retain its merited place in the text-books dealing with this subject. In the following pages consideration will be given only to brachy- phalangy and combinations in which brachyphalangy is the main feature. Brachyphalangy is defined as a shortening of definite pha- langes along their long axis, while other phalanges are normal. Scat- tered around in the literature, a great many cases are reported which belong to this group of malformations. When we take into considera- tion the mechanism of the growth in length of the phalanges (the undis- turbed growth during the growth years of the epiphysial cartilages which continuously yields material for the ossification process) it is at once clear that many different influences which interfere with this mechanism will result in a shortening of the phalanx in question. A trauma (or different pathological processes, such as inflammations, etc., which destroy the epiphysial cartilages) will result in a cessation in the growth in length of the bone, and disturbances in the normal embryological development may lead to the same result. Several cases belonging to these types of brachyphalangy are easily excluded from the material because they have no bearing upon our subject, but some may present a pathological-anatomical picture which is likely to be confused with the ones we are here considering. This is especially true of some of the cases of brachyphalangy called forth by embryological disturbances. One group deserves special mention, as presenting features of interest for our purpose. This type is rather commonly met with in the literature. It is characterized by a total absence or marked shortening of all the phalanges of the second row on one hand, combined with a defect of the musculus pectoralis major and minor and eventually of some other breast muscles on the same side. Fiirst (1900) gives 12 cases from the literature, all very like each other in appearance. The interesting point is that this brachyphalangy, which is not inherited and is recog- nized as belonging to the embryological malformations, invariably affects the second row of phalanges. When the cases previously mentioned are excluded, those cases of brachyphalangy remain in which we have more or less information, REVIEW OF LITERATURE. 9 proving that they are inherited, together with cases where no such information is given, but where the type described renders it almost certain that they belong to the same class. With regard to the first class, cases where heredity is demonstrated, it is of interest to notice that some of the clearest investigations demonstrating the Mendelian inheritance of this malformation are " pre-Mendelian " in point of time. As far back as in 1857, MacKinder published an account of a family in which a case of brachyphalangy combined with hypophalangy was inherited for six generations in a way quite typical for a regular domi- nant Mendelian character. MacKinder examined individuals repre- senting three of these generations. The most characteristic feature in MacKinder's case is a brachy- phalangous condition or more often a total absence of the second row of phalanges of the second to fourth fingers on both hands, combined with brachyphalangy or absence of the third row on all or on the two ulnar fingers with a corresponding lack or abortive condition of the nails. In most of the individuals the feet are affected similarly to a greater or less degree. The most important point, besides the Mendelian inheritance of the malformation, is the fact that it manifests itself under several distinctly different somatic types. A somewhat similar case is reported by Clarke (1915). The thumbs are normal ; the second and third fingers have only two phalanges, the second row being absent; the fourth and fifth fingers have only one phalanx, namely, the basal one. Judging from the two radiographs given, it seems probable that there really is present a very much shortened rudimentary second phalanx in the fourth and fifth fingers, ankylosed to the basal ones. Nails are absent. No information is given concerning the feet. The malformation is found in 10 individuals, covering four generations. From the short description it can not be seen whether or not different somatic types are found in the affected individuals. A third case of hypophalangy combined with brachyphalangy is published by Cragg and Drinkwater (1916). The abnormality consists in a symmetrical and entire absence of the distal phalanges and the most extreme brachyphalangy of the second row of phalanges in each digit except thumb and big toe. Nails absent. The abnormality is found in 27 individuals, inherited as a typical Mendelian dominant for five generations. However, 6 of the affected members of the family represent another somatic type. In these individuals there is in addition a very characteristic bifur- cation of the thumb. They belong to three different families, two in each, and the thumb of their hypophalangous parent was in all cases normal. The authors state that " there is little doubt that there is 10 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. some hereditary influence at work, but how it acts it is impossible to say." The supposition of a dominant modifying factor, introduced through the normal parents of these individuals, would account for the occurrence of this special type, a point that is discussed to some extent later in the present paper. Before leaving this group a case reported by Walker (1901) deserves mention. He followed a case of complete bony ankylosis of various joints between the phalanges, combined with brachyphalangy and hypophalangy, transferred by the affected individuals through five generations. The shortening was in nearly every instance most strikingly observed in the middle phalanx. The hypophalangy, absence of one or more bones of the little and ring finger, occurred in some members of the fifth generation. This case accordingly repre- sents another example of a dominant malformation of this class mani- festing itself under different somatic types. A second group of brachyphalangy, less extreme than the one just spoken of, is the one to which Farabee's case belongs. Here, too, we have a very clear " pre-Mendelian " case, described by Kummel in 1895 (Fall xx), "Alle Finger haben nur zwei Phalangen." The second row is described as being entirely absent. "Nichts auffallendes" was noticed with regard to the feet, a statement to which not very much importance can be attributed since radiographs are lacking. The malformation of the hands is "auf das genaueste symmetrisch." Kummel investigated three generations and his pedigree — including more than 50 individuals, of which about 30 are affected (some uncer- tain)— clearly shows the features typical for the inheritance of a simple Mendelian dominant. Kummel was fully aware of the fact that family members who do not show the malformation have only normal children. The standard case of this type is that of Farabee (1905), who fol- lowed the malformation through five generations including 33 normal and 37 abnormal individuals, of which 3 were photographed and radiographed. Farabee interpreted his case as one of "hypopha- langia," "reduction in the number of phalanges." "One is hardly justified in saying that one or the other segment is missing." But Drinkwater (1908 and 1914-15) recognized, by means of his more numerous radiographs, that the nature of the malformation is in reality a very pronounced brachyphalangy of the second row of pha- langes combined with a bony ankylosis of this rudimentary phalanx with the terminal one. Farabee states that "in all cases hands and feet were affected in exactly the same way." That the malformation can hardly have been as invariable as Fara- bee's description seems to indicate may be concluded from Drink- water's paper (1914-15). This author succeeded in proving that his "second brachydactylous family" was an English line of the American family studied by Farabee, one member having emigrated to England, there giving rise to the family studied by Drinkwater. REVIEW OF LITERATURE. 11 It is true, from Drinkwater's investigation, that the main feature is the abortive condition of the ankylosed second row of phalanges in the second to fourth fingers and a brachyphalangy of the first phalanx of the thumb. But Drinkwater's description and radiographs demonstrate that there is a marked variability in the somatic appear- ance of the character. Not only is the typical ankylosis lacking in several hands on one or more fingers and the degree of brachyphalangy conspicuously different in different individuals, but in addition to the malformation of the finger bones a typical brachyphala,ngy of one or more metacarpal and metatarsal bones occurs in some cases. The distribution of these special types within the family can not be traced from Drinkwater's paper. The author states that the malformation was always exactly symmetrical, even in those cases that show special peculiarities. Another case analogous to those of Kummel, Farabee, and Drink- water is recorded by Gubler (1850) and Gruber (1865) who, however, give no information concerning the heredity. More numerous than the extreme cases so far considered are those in which the shortening is less pronounced, so that the brachypha- langous bone, in general, more or less clearly retains the shape of a normal bone shortened along the long axis. This type of malformation may affect phalanges alone, metatarsal or metacarpal bones alone, or at the same tune bones of both these categories. Machol, in his elab- orate review of the literature (1907), finds that the phalanges are affected in only 21 per cent of his cases, metacarpalia and metatarsalia in 58 per cent, and combinations of both in 21 per cent. But it must be added that his material is very heterogeneous. The shortening may affect many different hand bones, but here, too, a certain predilection seems to rule with regard to the second row of phalanges in the second to fourth fingers. As a typical case may be cited Joachimsthal's Fall 3 (1900), where a mother and one of her daughters showed brachyphalangy of these phalanges. But most representative are Drinkwater's observations (1912-13, 1913-14). In his two families the brachyphalangy affected the second phalanx of the second to fourth fingers and toes. In the toes there was also an ankylosis between the shortened phalanx and the terminal one. Drinkwater's pedigree covers in both cases five generations, and there is a remarkable constancy of the somatic appear- ance of the character. A peculiar type of brachyphalangy, restricted to the phalanges only, is the one recorded by Leboucq (1896) and Joachimsthal (1900), where the shortening of different phalanges (especially of the second row) is combined with hyperphalangy, the index or the middle finger consisting of four phalanges, some of which are brachyphalangous. Joachimsthal describes this type in three members of the same family and hi the following generation two individuals were affected in the same 12 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. way. That there must be here a marked variation in the somatic appearance of the character seems indicated by the fact that one of these affected members of the last generation is said to have had normal parents. A very interesting case where brachyphalangy in some individuals is combined with hyperphalangy, as in the cases just mentioned, is reported by Vidal (1910), and extensively referred to and discussed by Rabaud (1912). The record covers five generations, including 84 individuals. Two members of the third generation show the com- bination of brachyphalangy with hyperphalangy and ankylosis. In two individuals from the next generation only brachyphalangy is present. One of these is interesting because the somatic type is very much like the one here studied, the second phalanx of the index fingers only being affected. In the other the second phalanx of the third and fifth fingers are also brachyphalangous. Vidal does not try to bring his results in relation to the Mendelian laws, and Rabaud uses his radiographs and records to prove that the Mendelian heredity does not hold true for human material, since the ratio between brachyphalangous and not-brachyphakngous individuals in the offspring of affected family members is not in accord with the theoretical expectation, and since the brachyphalangy which in some cases behaves as a Mendelian dominant in others skips a generation. Many family members are, however, described by Vidal as having what he calls "doigt crochu" on one or on both hands, and these are considered as "not brachyphalangous." A glance at the pedigree shows that this is only another somatic manifestation of the character, and in fact the most common one. The "doigt crochu" is shown by 19 individuals, while 11 are brachyphalangous. When both types are counted together and considered as "affected," the ratio between normal and affected individuals in the offspring of heterozygous indi- viduals is very close to 1 : 1, the theoretical expectation. The case represents accordingly a very striking example of a dom- inant malformation which manifests itself under very different somatic types, a relation which can be explained through the assumption of the presence of modifying factors. Cases in which the shortening affects metacarpal and metatarsal bones are more frequently met with in the literature than the cases in which principally the phalanges show the brachyphalangy. This type is reported by Goldmann (1891), Kummel (1895), Roughton (1897), Fontana and Vacchelli (1902), Sternberg (1902), Wagner (1903-04), Hochheim (1903-04), Kenyeres (1905-06), Riedl (1907), and others. The malformation generally affects one to three of the metacarpse and metatarsse. The ulnar side seems most often to be affected. The symmetry and vertical correspondence is not so marked as in the cases discussed above, and since information concerning the REVIEW OF LITERATURE. 13 heredity of the malformation is very unsatisfactory or entirely lacking these cases will not be the object of further examination. Brachyphalangy of the second row of phalanges combined with a shortening of the metacarpal bone of the thumb is instanced in Col- son's case (1883), referred to by Leboucq (1896). The malformation was here inherited through four generations. The examination is not elaborate enough to permit conclusions to be drawn with regard to the possible occurrence of different somatic types. A consideration of the cases of brachyphalangy reported in the literature brings out the following facts : Several distinctly different types of brachyphalangy are known. In all cases where sufficiently elaborate information is secured concerning their inheritance, they are seen to be inherited as dominant Mendelian characters. Some of the cases which clearly show a Mendelian inheri- tance were published previous to the rediscovery of Mendel's work. The malformations are known only in heterozygous individuals. Intermarriage between affected individuals is not so far recorded. In the inheritance of many cases of brachyphalangy, it is a charac- teristic feature that the inherited malformation shows a very marked variation in its somatic appearance. Within a family where a gene for brachyphalangy is inherited, the character very often presents itself under quite different somatic types. This tendency suggests the assumption that the normal individuals married into the family are heterozygous for different modifying genes which may change the effect of the gene for brachyphalagy in question. (See pp. 58-61.) In hereditary cases of brachyphalangy, as well as in brachyphalangy due to embryological disturbances, the second row of phalanges seems to be most often and most severely affected. In the embryo it is this row in which the ossification is last to begin (Fiirst, 1900; Mall, 1906) ; and in young individuals the cartilage epiphysis of this row of phalanges is the last to complete ossification (Holmgren, 1910). NOTE. — The paper by H. M. Smith (1904) was overlooked until after the above discussion had gone to press. 14 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. III. METHOD OF EXAMINATION. Special features in the character under consideration soon convinced us of the absolute unreliability and insufficiency of second-hand infor- mation. It was found necessary to pay fully as much attention to those said to be normal as to those reported to be brachyphalangous. A satisfactory examination had to comprise photographs and radio- graphs in both cases. In some cases it was almost impossible to per- suade members of the family to permit photographs and radiographs to be taken. This was especially true with regard to those who con- sidered themselves to be normal; but we are indebted to other family members who took special interest in the work and tried to help in every way possible. We have thus been able to trace the abnormality without any break through six generations. The photographs of the malformation cover five generations, the radiographs four. In the line of the family which forms the principal subject of the present publication we have secured photographs of the hands of all the members of four generations with only two exceptions, two children who died young. In the large majority of cases we have also succeeded in obtaining radiographs of the hands. This complete collection of radiographs has furnished us with measurements of the hand phalanges of both the normal and abnormal members of the family — exact numerical material invaluable for the analysis of the inheritance of the character. In order to get this collection of measurements as complete as pos- sible we have usually been forced to abstain from taking radiographs and photographs of the feet. Because of malformation due to wearing shoes, the radiographs of the feet in general are not nearly as favorable as those of the hands for measuring shortened phalanges. We have therefore endeavored to gather only sufficient radiographs of affected feet to demonstrate that the abnormality affects the same phalanx of hands and feet symmetrically; that it shows symmetry and vertical correspondence as well. The lengths of the phalanges were secured from the radiographs by measuring in millimeters the distance between the center of the proxi- mal and the center of the distal articular surface, this distance repre- senting the axis of the bone in question. No difficulties are involved in determining the latter of these two points. The distal articulation surface is convex and the line marking this limit of the phalanx is therefore always perfectly clear in the radiographs. Not quite so easy is the determination of the other measuring-point. The proximal articular surfaces of the middle row of phalanges present a slight middle elevation and two lateral depressions adapted to articu- late with the condyles of the first phalanges. The articular surface as a whole being slightly concave, a lighter shadow of the peripheral parts METHOD OF EXAMINATION. 15 of the phalangeal extremity often overlaps the darker shadow that outlines the main mass of the bone. A very dark, condensed shadow in the radiograph, however, indicates the limit of the two depressions and the central elevation just mentioned, and the point representing the apex of this shadow is always used as the second measuring-point, i. 6., not including the light, overlapping shadow where this is present. In cases where the brachyphalangy is so pronounced that the form of the phalanx is entirely altered, the longest diameter (in the longi- tudinal direction) of the remaining roundish bone is used as the value representing the length. In some of the most elaborate earlier publications in regard to hereditary brachyphalangy (Farabee 1905; Drinkwater 1908, 1912-13, 1913-14, 1914-15) it was stated that the affected individuals were also below the average in stature. Attention was paid to the possi- bility of a similar occurrence in our case, but it soon became clear that this condition could not be regarded as typical for the affected mem- bers of the family here described. We therefore refrained from measur- ing the height of the individuals in order to make the examination simple. All unrelated individuals married into the family will be regarded as normal — that is, free from the type of brachyphalangy here investi- gated. In view of the unique character of the described type and the rare occurrence of inherited brachyphalangy in general, this point needs no further explanation. 16 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. IV. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE BRACHYPHALANGY STUDIED. The hands of the brachyphalangous individuals which first came to our knowledge are of a very characteristic aspect (figs. 4, 7, 10). While the middle part of the hand and all the other fingers are normal, the index finger appears strikingly shortened. In the most pronounced cases this finger as a whole is only a little longer than the basal seg- ment of the third finger. Inspection from the dorsal side of the hand shows at once that the shortening is limited to the middle segment of the index. The basal segment is normal and so is the distal one, and in all cases the nail is quite normal. Seen from the volar surface, it is noticed that the index fingers in the most pronounced cases have only two instead of the normal three grooves. This is, for instance, true of the hands represented in fig. 4 and fig. 7. In other cases there are three grooves, but the distance between the two distal ones appears very markedly shortened when compared with the same distance in normal hands. In one case there are three grooves on one index and only two on the other (fig. 12). It will easily be understood from the photographs that a superficial examination would lead to the conclusion that the middle segment of the finger is entirely missing, an opinion which is general within the family. But palpation quickly makes it clear that the middle phalanx is present, even if only as a rudimentary sesamoid bone. This mal- formed phalanx is often subluxated to the ulnar side of the joint, where it can be felt, a relation which explains a characteristic feature in the aspect of many of the affected index fingers ; for, as will be seen from several of the photographs, the brachyphalangous index is not straight, but slightly bent, the basal phalanx forming a slight angle with the terminal one, the latter pointing in a radial direction. It is typical that this bent condition is most often met with on the right hand, while the left brachyphalangous index is generally straight. This relation is explained by the information frequently obtained that the mothers of the affected children always tell them to pull and straighten the index fingers. The children, being right-handed, are more energetic in their treatment of the left index, and the result just described is obtained. The bent condition of the brachyphalangous finger is in several cases very marked, and the brachyphalangy is often referred to by the members of the family as ''crooked fingers." The brachyphalangy seems not to affect the use of the hand in any particular way. Family members of the most different occupations all state that they can easily do any kind of work with their hands. The flexion of the indices is, however, limited when compared with normal hands, and in some cases it is easy to produce a subluxation of the terminal phalanx. DESCRIPTION OF BRACHYPHALANGY STUDIED. 17 An inspection of the photographs represented will demonstrate that the brachyphalangy is in general strikingly symmetrical if we dis- regard the bent condition just mentioned. The difference in length between the brachyphalangous indices of the same individual is never very pronounced. With regard to the type of the brachyphalangous hand in general, it has been found that some of the individuals have a rather clumsy hand with fairly short fingers (figs. 4, 7), but this condition can not be regarded as characteristic for the affected individuals only. Their normal brothers and sisters may represent a similar type (fig. 1), and on the other side we have cases where the brachyphalangy is present in hands of a very slender type with long, thin fingers (fig. 18). These general statements concerning the type of the brachypha- langy described are confirmed and made clearer by the study of the radiographs. It will be seen from these that the brachyphalangy is restricted to the second phalanx of the index, its form and size having undergone a complete change. In many cases the shortening of this bone is so pronounced as to leave merely a scarcely visible rudimentary roundish bone, generally situated at the ulnar side of the articulation established through the coming together of the distal articular surface of the basal phalanx with the proximal of the terminal one (figs. 4, 7, 10). Every trace of the normal form of the second index phalanx has disappeared; but we have no case in our material where the second phalanx is entirely absent. In some cases the rudimentary second phalanx has one or two (figs. 39, 40) small articular surfaces for articulation with the other phalanges. In the last case the radial part of the articulation is established through the articular surfaces of the first and third phalanx, while at the ulnar part they have adapted their form for articulation with the two oblique articular surfaces of the rudimentary second phalanx. The articulation shows in these cases a Y form in the radiographs (fig. 40). Not always, however, is the change in form so thoroughgoing. Figs. 42, 45, and 51 show how the brachyphalangous bone may retain its character of a phalanx with two typical articular surfaces. The bone is thick and lacks the narrower middle part, characteristic for a normal phalanx. A radiograph from a 12-year-old child (fig. 15) shows a total absence of epiphysial cartilage and reveals the fact that the brachyphalangous condition is brought about by a premature ossification of the cartilage, resulting in a stopping of the growth in length. An examination of the feet of the brachyphalangous individuals con- firms then* statements that the feet are affected in exactly the same way as the hands. We have made sufficiently numerous personal examinations to conclude that the brachyphalangy shows a striking vertical correspondence. Only the second phalanx of the second toe is brachyphalangous. The other bones of the feet are normal. Fig. 18 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. 50 is from a radiograph of the foot of a brachyphalangous member of the family. It demonstrates the typical condition and needs no further description. The investigation of the so-called normal individuals within the affected family soon demonstrated that the malformation also mani- fests itself under another and markedly different somatic type. Several examples of this type are given in figs. 13, 19-25, and 31-36. Examined from the dorsal surface, the hands in some cases would easily be regarded as normal (figs. 13, 23, 31, and 35); in other cases a slight shortening of the indices is clearly recognizable. An inspection from the volar surface shows that here also the shortening is restricted to the second phalanx of the indices. This is indicated by a shortening of the distance between the middle and the distal grooves of the skin. Sometimes this shortening is very marked and can not be overlooked (figs. 20, 21, and 34) ; but in other cases it is so slight that even a careful comparison with normal hands leaves it doubtful whether the abnor- mality is present or not (figs. 13, 24). Index fingers of this type often seem to be a little narrower around the second segment, which makes the third segment look a little club-shaped and thickened (figs. 9, 34). They are always straight, a bent condition (as described above) never being observed. It will be easily understood that the shortening of the distance between the second and third grooves as a measure is very inexact. It is therefore in many cases very unsatisfactory as a diagnostic feature, and a control by radiographs is absolutely essential. The radiographs in most cases clearly show that the second index phalanx is shortened and sometimes a little narrower, but we have cases where it is very hard to tell whether a shortening is actually present or not. The length of the finger bones is very variable in nor- mal hands, and only a very careful analysis of the measures obtained from the radiographs permits certain conclusions to be drawn. This point is discussed on pages 51-55. It may here be stated only that this analysis in the great majority of the more doubtful cases clearly shows that a brachyphalangy of the second index phalanx is present, but we have a few cases where the measurements fall within the limits of extreme variation in normal hands. Here a conclusive decision can be reached only through the genetical test obtained from the examina- tion of the offspring. With regard to the form of the shortened phalanx, it will be noticed in the radiographs that the typical phalanx form is retained. The radiographs from children's hands show that the epiphysial cartilages are present in the affected phalanges. We have in our material no cases representing an intermediate con- dition between the two types just described. We are evidently dealing DESCRIPTION OF BRACHYPHALANGY STUDIED. 19 with two distinct somatical types of brachyphalangy. They will in the following be characterized respectively as the simply brachypha- langous or "B-type" and the very brachyphalangous or "B!-type." It needs no special explanation to show that this presence of the B-type, which in some cases seems to overlap the extreme variations in normal, not brachyphalangous hands, makes it necessary to examine and especially to procure radiographs from all the members of the family — not only the evidently brachyphalangous members, but also those who from a superficial examination seem to be normal. If this had not been done the whole pedigree would have been full of mistakes and contradictions. 20 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. V. FAMILY RECORD. In this family record the following method of numeration will be used: Each individual is given a number corresponding to his order of birth in his fraternity. His offspring have the same number plus their own ordinal number. Since in some families there are more than 10 children, a period is always placed just before the fraternity number of each invididual. Thus the first brachyphalangous member of the present family is 1. Her offspring are 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc., to 1.17. The offspring of 1.1 are 11.1, 11.2, etc.; of 1.5: 15.1, 15.2, etc. The number of digits in each case represents the number of generations from individual 1. Relationship is also obvious at a glance — 1153.2 and 1154.1, for example, are evidently cousins. One of the main advantages of this system is that it enables new individuals to be inserted in the pedigree without renumbering any of those already pedigreed. As a rule, only initials and dates of birth and death will be used to mark the individuals. Men and women will be designated in the ordinary manner by d1 and 9 . In the descrip- tion and measurements the Roman numerals I-V will characterize the fingers, I meaning the thumb, V the little finger. The Arabic figs. 1-3 will be used in referring to the phalanges, 1 being the basal, 3 the terminal phalanx. I GENERATION. 1. Marthe Kristine Haarbye (Dec. 19, 1764-Feb. 1, 1826) is the first brachyphalangous individual concerning whom the family book contains detailed information. She was born in Fredrikshald, Norway, as the oldest daughter of merchant Andreas Haarbye, from Aarhus in Jylland, Denmark. Her mother, Kristine Skouw (1729-1814), was born in Fredrikshald, Norway. Marthe Kristine Haarbye married, in 1782, district judge L. 0, born in Flekkefjord, Norway, between 1750 and 1760, died May 18, 1812. About her the family book gives the following very interesting information, here quoted literally: "She left 10 living children and 22 grandchildren, 18 living, about whom the following pages are written, and be it noticed that every second child has, as she had herself, crooked or shortened index fingers with only one joint. Besides the 10 children she had also 7 other children, who were stillborn." This portion of the family book was written by her son, bailiff L. 0., 1.7 cT. He was a very intelligent and precise man who took special interest in genealogy and wrote the family book for three generations with admirable care. He had the shortened index fingers himself in a very pronounced degree, as will appear later. The infor- mation he gives about his 9 brothers and sisters is in every respect FAMILY RECORD. 21 22 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. unusually elaborate and accurate and the quoted statement concerning the hands of his mother and her 10 children can safely be regarded as reliable. A control of the correctness of his statement that "every second child" had the malformation is furnished by our investigation, which has shown that the following children: l.l9,1.39,1.7cT, and 1.9cf were brachyphalangous. We have succeeded in determining this either through direct information concerning the individuals them- selves or through the occurrence of affected individuals in their off spring. Regarding No. 1.5 d1, who married twice and left 5 children, we have not yet had the opportunity of carrying out the examination of his descendants; but since all the results we have so far obtained are strongly in support of the correctness of the quoted statement, it is exceedingly probable that it holds for this brother of the author as well. The statement that the malformed index fingers had "only one joint" shows that No. 1 9 M. K. H. must have had the B!-type of the brachyphalangous condition. Whether the brachyphalangy was transferred to this individual from her parents or whether we here have the first occurrence of the character has not been determined No re- marks are found in the family book concerning the hands of her parents. She had three brothers and one sister, all of whom married, and their descendants are living in different parts of Norway. But we have not had time to find out whether or not members of these families show brachyphalangy. The husband of 1, L. p., who was from quite another part of Nor- way, was unrelated to her and may be regarded as normal. Their children represent the members of Generation II, now to be described. II GENERATION. From this generation we have been able to provide our first photo- graph demonstrating the characteristic brachyphalangy of the indices (fig. 3). The photograph is owned by a member of the IV generation and he knows with certainty that it represents one of his grand-uncles, a son of the parents just spoken of, though he can no longer remember which of them. Moreover, the clothing worn by the photographed man proves beyond doubt that he belonged to this and not to the fol- lowing generation. The photograph gives a good idea of the abnormality (fig. 3). Both indices are strikingly shortened and look as if they had only one joint. The terminal phalanges and their nails seem to be normal, but on both hands they are bent in a radial direction in relation to the axis of the basal phalanx. We have in later generations good examples of a similar type. Radiographs show in these cases that the second phalanx is present, but only as a bone of the size of a pea, while phalanges 1 and 3 are normal. The bent condition of the finger is caused by the dis- FAMILY RECORD. 23 location in ulnar direction of this rudimentary bone (cf. figs. 39, 40, and 41). This individual belongs clearly to the B!-type of our brachy- phalangy. The II generation comprises, as already stated, 10 individuals born alive (1.1-1.10) and 7 who were still-born (1.11-1.17). 1.1 9 G. H. 0. (May 17, 1784-Nov. 21, 1849) brought the mal- formation into the line of the family which forms the main subject of this publication. No photographs of her hands have been obtain- able, but information from different sources agrees in the statement that she had very short index fingers. This is also in accord with the quoted statement from the family book, which in addition indicates that she showed the B!-type of the brachyphalangy. Genetically she must have been heterozygous for the factor in question. She married in 1811 district judge and "kancelliraad" P. F. M. H. (May 3, 1780-Aug. 19, 1838) from Kongsberg, Norway. His hands were normal. They had 5 children (11.1-11.5) who will be spoken of in detail later. 1.2 9 T. K. S. 0. (May 25, 1788-Mar. 19, 1867). She married in 1806 J. H. (Aug. 20, 1780-Aug 19, 1838) and had numerous descend- ants. No information of brachyphalangy has been found concerning either herself or her descendants. 1.3 9 M. K. 0. (Aug. 3, 1791-May 15, 1867). According to the statement of the family book, her index fingers must have been bra- chyphalangous of the B!-type. She married, in 1812, proprietor Aa. Aa. (1790-Oct. 23, 1854), from the Trondhjem district in Norway. They had 9 children, most of whom married. One of her sons married twice, both tunes with unrelated women. By his second marriage he had a son, born in 1859, concerning whom the author of the family book adds the following note: "with crooked fingers." The term "crooked fingers" is very often used by the family mem- bers to mark the brachyphalangous condition of the indices. Clearly the author, who was brachyphalangous himself to a very pronounced degree, intends by the note to state that the individual had brachy- phalangous index fingers. This information of the occurrence of a brachyphalangous individual among the descendants of 1.3 9 M. K. 0. strongly supports the statement formerly quoted and causes us to regard it as certain that she was brachyphalangous. 1.4 9 A. K. 0. (Dec. 24, 1794-Sept. 28, 1853). She married, in 1818, merchant J. H. (1791-Oct. 23, 1860) from Christiania, Norway, and had 3 children. They all married and had several children. No data about brachyphalangy have been obtained concerning either herself or her descendants. 1.5 cf H. T. 0. (born Dec. 13, 1795). To judge from the above statement in the family book, his indices must have been brachy- phalangous and of the B !-type. Like the other affected individuals of 24 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. this generation, he must have been heterozygous for the factor in ques- tion. He married twice: (1) C. E. who died May 15, 1823, after hav- ing had 3 children. (2) in 1828 M. C., born in 1802, by whom he had 2 children. One of his married daughters had 2 children. We have, as stated above, not yet been able to carry out the examination of this line of the family and do not know if brachyphalangy has occurred among the rather few descendants. 1.6 9 A. C. 0. (June 18, 1800-Jan. 4, 1882). She married in 1822 bank treasurer P. £)., from 0sterdalen, Norway, who died Oct. 21, 1841. They had no children. There are no data indicating that her indices were brachyphalangous. 1.7 c?1 L. 0. (Aug. 6, 1801-Mar. 6, 1870), bailiff, Nesodden, near Christiania, Norway. This man is the author of the family book so far as the three earlier generations are concerned. He was the most prominent member of the family and had an extensive acquaintance. Three different persons still living, who knew him personally, agree in the statement that his index fingers were "very short," "with one joint," that is of the B !-type. Genetically he must have been hetero- zygous for the factor for brachyphalangy. Though we have seen several photographs of him, none of them shows his indices. Where he is taken full length, he always conceals his hands in a very obvious manner. He married in 1828 E. K. 0 (Nov. 28, 1807-Mar. 19, 1858), from Bserum near Christiania, Norway. She and her husband were unrelated. Her hands were normal. They had only one child, a daughter F. G. H. 0., 17.1 9 (p. 28). 1.8 9 S. C. 0. (Nov. 5, 1802-Mar. 17, 1857). She married, in 1825, proprietor J. S. F. (May 31, 1788-Apr. 18, 1863), Voss pr. Bergen, Nor- way. They had 5 children with many descendants. No information yet obtained indicates whether she or any of her descendants had brachyphalangous hands. 1.9 c? F. J. 0. (May 10, 1804-Sept. 28, 1872) was a tanner. Accord- ing to the statement in the family book he must have been brachy- phalangous and of the B !-type, being heterozygous for the factor. One of his granddaughters (194.1 9 C. F. A.) told of her own accord that his index fingers had "only one joint." He married, in 1834, C. R., from Asker, Norway, and had 9 children, most of them married and with numerous descendants. Among his children, as well as among the members of the two following generations, we have been able to find brachyphalangous individuals. From members of the fourth, fifth, and sixth generation we have taken photographs and radiographs to be described below. l.lOcf S. A. L. 0. (born Oct. 14, 1807), bank treasurer. He married P. M. I. (Nov. 6, 1794- July 17, 1873) and had one daughter who married and had two children. No information has been obtained indicating that he or his descendants had brachyphalangy. FAMILY RECORD. 25 1.11-1.17. Seven still-born children of unknown sex. No infor- mation concerning their hands has been obtainable. This finishes the description of the II generation. Our investigation shows that 5 of the 10 members of the family born at full term had brachyphalangy of the B !-type. It is impossible to tell whether any of the members whom the author of the family book regarded as normal may not have been brachyphalangous of the B-type. The instances in which this condition has escaped the observation of very intelligent observers are numerous within our experience. It is true that we have not been able to point out the occurrence of brachyphalangy among the descendants of those members of the family who were supposed to be normal, but not very much importance can be attributed to this fact, because we have so far concentrated our attention on the lines descending from 1.1, 1.7, and 1.9. The inquiries and examinations we have been able to make within the other lines are not elaborate enough to permit certain conclusions drawn from a negative result. Where the result has been positive — that is, where we have been able to show the occurrence of brachypha- langy among the descendants of members of generation II, the con- ditions are different. The inheritance of the malformation as worked out in this paper allows us, in such cases, to conclude with certainty that the member of generation II, from whom the line in question descends, was brachyphalangous, at least when no intermarriages within the lines have taken place. In the following only the descendants of No. 1.1 9 , 1.7 cf, and 1.9 cf will be described. They will be spoken of as belonging respectively to "Lines" 1, 7, and 9. LINE 1, III GENERATION. The members of the III generation belonging to line 1 comprise the 5 children of the brachyphalangous 1.1 9 G. H. 0. and her husband P. F. M. H. 11. Id1 C. E. H. (Mar. 11, 1814-1884), a farmer, married in 1859 M. C., but had no children. None of the members of the family or other persons now living, who knew him, noticed any abnormality of his indices. 11.2 cf F. G. H. (May 13, 1819-Aug. 29, 1856), unmarried. A member of the family who knew him "never noticed or heard of short- ness of his fingers." 11.3 cf F. L. C. G. H. (Mar. 31, 1821-Mar. 20, 1895), unmarried. A letter from one of his nieces states that "uncle L. had short index fingers." This statement is confirmed by one of his nephews, who adds that "both his index fingers had a crook" — that is, were bent. The bent condition indicates that his brachyphalangy was of the B !-type. Genetically he must have been heterozygous for the factor in question. 26 A NEW TYPE OF BEACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. 11.4 9 L. A. H. H. (Sept. 15, 1822-Feb. 11, 1907). AU information concerning her, including that from her daughter, is in accord concerning the fact that her fingers were normal. The correctness of this state- ment is confirmed by a photograph. She married, in 1846, district physician A. H. H. (Aug. 17, 1815-May 29, 1880), who was quite unrelated to her. They had 12 children (114.1-114.12). 11.5 cf C. A. B. H. (Jan. 11, 1825-July 21, 1910), bailiff. He is the first member of the family whose hands were photographed and radio- graphed. Dr. Frimann Koren, who took these photographs, at the same time obtained casts of his hands. His hands show the B !-type of brachyphalangy in a very characteristic form. Genetically he was heterozygous for the factor for brachyphalangy. The photographs (fig. 4) give a good idea of the shape of his hands and make it easy to understand how the affected members who show the B !-type generally believe that the second phalanx of their index is missing. It will be seen that the entire brachyphalangous index is only a little longer than the basal phalanx of the third finger. The left index is straight, but on the right the basal phalanx forms a slight angle with the terminal one, the latter being somewhat bent in a radial direction. Except for the indices the hands are normal, as shown in the photograph. The radiographs (fig. 39) give a clear conception of the nature of the B !-type brachyphalangy. They show that the shortening is com- pletely restricted to the second phalanx of the indices. This bone is not absent, but remains as a rudimentary sesamoid bone. This small bone is in both hands dislocated in the ulnar direction, thus leaving the basal and the terminal phalanx to constitute the main articulation surfaces. At the ulnar side of the j oint the rudimentary second phalanx sticks between the other two and the articular surface of the terminal phalanx is oblique, articulating with the basal only on the radial side. The striking symmetry of the malformation needs only to be mentioned. It will be noticed that some of the other phalanges of the hands show indications of pathological alteration. The individual was, however, nearly 80 years old when the radiographs were taken and our large collection of radiographs from brachyphalangous hands permits us to conclude that these alterations are of another nature and bear no relation to the brachyphalangy. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 measured from the radiographs are respectively 6 and 27 mm. on both hands. This individual married twice and his first marriage is of especial interest, being the only intermarriage between members of affected lines. He married, namely, first his cousin 17.1 9 F. G. 0. (Mar. 15, 1829-Mar. 22, 1872), the only child of his uncle 1.7 d" L. 0., who had the B!-type of the brachyphalangy (p. 24). We have made numerous efforts to determine whether she was brachyphalangous, but it has not FAMILY RECORD. 27 been possible to reach a certain conclusion. A photograph of her hands (fig. 5) shows at least that she did not have the B !-type of brachy- phalangy, but from our discussion of the B-type later it will be seen that she may very well have had this type of the malformation. It would have been necessary to have a photograph of the inside of her hands to settle the question. One of her husband's children by his second marriage has heard that her index fingers were slightly short- ened, but our experience with such information prevents us from regarding it as of much value. The question is a very important one for our investigation, as will be seen later when we describe the two children, 115.1 9 and 115.2 9 , who were born from her marriage with her brachyphalangous cousin. If she was heterozygous for brachyphalangy, the only possibility in our material for children homozygous for brachyphalangy is present. The investigation of her children furnishes us, as we shall see, with very interesting points for a further discussion of this question. 11.5 cf C. A. B. H. married the second time, in 1874, S. M. C. W., who was unrelated to him and had normal hands. They had 6 chil- dren 115.3-115.8 (p. 29-32). This finishes the study of this family, representing the III genera- tion of line 1. The result indicates that 2 out of the 5 members of the family had the B !-type of the anomaly. The 3 others are supposed to have been normal, but the possibility that some of them may have had the B-type can not with certainty be excluded. In treating this line we have also finished the record of line 7, the only individual belonging to this line, namely 17.1 9 F. G. £)., the daughter of 1.7 cf L. £)., having married into line 1 and being therefore referred to here. LINE 1, IV GENERATION. The fourth generation of line 1 includes three families, the children of 11.4 9 L. A. H. H., who had normal hands, and those of the brachyphalangous 11.5 cf C. A. B. H. by his two marriages. FIRST FAMILY OF IV GENERATION. 11.4 9 L. A. H. H. had, by her marriage with A. H. H., 12 children, 114.1-114.12. 114.1 9 A. C. H. (b. Aug. 1, 1847). Unmarried. 114.2 9 A. H. (b. Apr. 21, 1849). Unmarried. 114.3 9 S. H. (b. Feb. 1, 1851). Unmarried. 114.4 9 H. H. (b. Apr. 1, 1852). Unmarried. 114.5 9 L. H. H. (b. Apr. 13, 1853). Unmarried. 114.6 cf H. H. (Aug. 14, 1855-May 6, 1910) married M. E. B. (Dec. 28, 1855-Apr. 21, 1912) and had 2 children, 1146.1 and 1146.2 (p. 32). 114.7 9 T. H. (b. Apr. 2, 1857). Married in 1880 J. M. G. B. (b. June 28, 1854), minister. They had 8 children, 1147.1-1147.8 (p. 32). 28 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. 114.8 d* A. H. (Nov. 1, 1858-Apr. 21, 1903). Married in 1900 A. A. L (b. Mar. 28, 1876) and had 2 children, 1148.1 and 1148.2 (p. 32). 114.9 9 E. H. (May 27, 1860-Oct. 10, 1860). 114.109 Aa. H. (b. Dec. 2, 1861). Married in 1883 merchant R. L. (b. Feb. 7, 1856). No children. 114.11 9 V. H. (Jan. 30, 1863-Dec. 18, 1875). 114.12 9 G. H. (Jan. 7, 1865-Dec. 12, 1866). All information we have obtained concerning the members of this family indicates that their hands were normal, thus confirming the conclusion that their mother was free from the factor for brachypha- langy. SECOND FAMILY OF IV GENERATION. The B !-type brachyphalangous ll.Sc? C. A. B.H. had by his first marriage with his cousin 17.1 9 F. G. 0 (p. 24), daughter of the B !-type brachyphalangous 1.7 cf L. 0., 2 children, 115.1 and 115.2. 115.19 E.A. H. (May 16, 1853-Nov. 3, 1913). She married pro- prietor 0. G., d. 1905, and had 3 children, 1151.1-1151.3 (p. 33). One of her half-brothers, when asked, gave us the information that her fingers were "not absolutely normal"; but her own son answered in a letter that her hands were normal, a statement which also was con- firmed by her daughter. A clear case of brachyphalangy is known to us among her descendants. At last we succeeded in getting a photo- graph showing her right hand. Though not very good, this photograph settles the question (fig. 6). It shows clearly that she was brachy- phalangous to a characteristic degree. The ends of the other fingers are in the photograph hidden, but enough of them is seen to show that she had the B-type of the malformation. The study of her descendants proves that she was heterozygous for the factor in question. 115.2 9 C. F. H. (May 9, 1855-Apr. 4, 1856). This second daugh- ter, who died one year old, demands special attention. All informa- tion is to the effect that she was a cripple, unable to develop; but it has so far been impossible to investigate the exact nature of her malforma- tion. This is explained through the fact that the family has inten- tionally not talked about her, regarding the birth of a cripple within the family as a point not to be mentioned. This practice has been followed so carefully that even the daughter of her own sister, when asked, did not know of her existence. The small amount of informa- tion resulting from our very elaborate inquiries is limited to the fol- lowing rather vague statements: Her half-brother, a very intelligent man, to whom we are highly indebted for much valuable information, states that "her whole osseous system was in disorder." Her half-sister knows with certainty that "her hands and feet, or at any rate her fingers and toes, were entirely absent." FAMILY RECORD. 29 This occurrence of a cripple, the only one in the whole family for six generations, as a result of an intermarriage between one brachy- phalangous individual and his cousin whose father had brachypha- langy, is very remarkable. It suggests the possibility that this cousin was brachyphalangous, genetically heterozygous for the factor, and that this child may have been homozygous for it, receiving one gene from her father and one from her mother. This explanation, if correct, involves the assumption that the character we have studied, the brachyphalangous index, represents only the heterozygous condition, and that the factor, when homozygous, affects the individual in a much more serious way. This conclusion is by no means certain, but is at least strongly suggested by the facts of the case. This point will be more especially discussed later. Summing up: Brachyphalangous ll.Sd" C. A. B. H., who showed the B !-type of the malformation, by his first marriage with his cousin 17.1 9 F. G. 0., had 2 children, one brachyphalangous and one cripple unable to develop. THIRD FAMILY OP IV GENERATION. The brachyphalangous 11. 5 c? C. A. B. H. married in 1874 for a second time. This wife (S. M. C. W., Aug. 1, 1843-May 3, 1899) was normal and quite unrelated to him. They had 6 children, 115.3-115.8. 115.3 cf P. F. G. H. (b. Nov. 16, 1875), mail carrier. A photograph of his hands is given in fig. 1. The indices are quite normal. We mention especially that photographs taken from the inside show that the distance between the two distal grooves in the skin marking the joints is very little shorter in the indices than in the fourth fingers. In brachyphalangous hands of the B-type this distance is generally markedly shorter in the indices. The radiographs prove that the relative lengths of the finger bones are normal, the lengths of II 2 and IV 2 being respectively 25 and 29 mm. on both hands. 115.3d" P. F. G. H. married J. G. (b. Oct. 10, 1880) who was not related to him and who has normal hands. They have 3 children, 1153.1-1153.3 (p. 34). 115.4cf M. H. (b. Apr. 4, 1870), merchant. A photograph of his hands (fig. 7) shows a very characteristic B !-type brachyphalangy. As in the case of his father's hands, the right brachyphalangous index is bent, while the left is straighter. Radiographs are given in fig. 40. In the right hand the short second phalanx of the index remains as a bone the size of a pea and is dis- located in the ulnar direction, as described when speaking of the father's hands. In the left index the second phalanx is seen to be reduced so much in size that its existence might almost be overlooked. Its position is (as on the right hand) in the ulnar part of the joint. The other finger bones are normal except the second phalanx of the fifth finger of the right hand, which is thicker and 4 mm. shorter than 30 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. the same bone on the left hand. This part of the radiograph is not very good and it is hard to tell how much importance should be attributed to this irregularity. It is the only case in our material where a bone in addition to the second phalanx of the index or the second toe is shortened. The fact that the corresponding bone of the left hand shows the normal length, in connection with the slight degree of the shortening, makes it doubtful whether this shortening ought to be regarded as a part of the brachyphalangy or merely as a variation due to other causes. The symmetry of the brachyphalangy of the indices is very pro- nounced. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are respectively 5 and 29 mm. on the right hand, 5 and 28 mm. on the left. 115.4d" M. H., who is genetically heterozygous for the factor for brachyphalangy, married the normal H. G. (b. May 16, 1887), a sister of J.G.,thewife of his brother 115.3. They had onedaughter 1154.1 (p.34). 115.5 tf H. M. H. (b. Feb. 11, 1879), bailiff. All of the second-hand information concerning this man agrees in indicating that he had normal hands. His brothers had not observed any malformation of his indices. We knew, however, that he had two small daughters — twins — who both were brachyphalangous, and when we wrote to him he answered that "the second phalanx of both the index fingers seems to be somewhat shortened." We have not so far had the opportunity of personally examining or procuring radiographs of his hands because he lives in a distant community, but the photographs (figs. 8 and 9) give a good idea of the malformation. We are dealing with a clear case of the B-type of brachyphalangy. Seen from the back of the hands the shortening is not very conspicuous and might easily be overlooked. The indices are only a little shorter than in a normal hand and the second phalanx is a little narrower than it is in a normal finger. This makes the terminal phalanx look as it it were somewhat club-shaped and thickened. The shortness of the second phalanx is far more strikingly seen in fig. 9, showing the inside of the hands. The distance between the two distal grooves is considerably shorter on the indices than on the fourth fingers. The shortening seems to be strongly symmetrical. This individual is genetically heterozygous for the factor for brachy- phalangy. He married the normal D. K. (b. Nov. 39, 1879) and has 3 children, the two younger being identical twins, 1155.1-1155.3 (pp.34-35). 115.6 cf C. S. H. (b. Nov. 19, 1880), farmer. Photographs of his hands are given in fig. 10. They need no special description, the fingers being very like those of his father, 11.5 cf, and of the brother, 115.4 cf , already described. On the left index the shortened second phalanx (dislocated as usual to the ulnar part of the joint formed by the first and third) is seen to form a little projection on the left side of the finger. FAMILY RECORD. 31 The radiograph (fig. 41) of the left hand is not clear enough to show the limits of the shortened bone, but the presence of the luxated rudi- mentary phalanx in the ulnar part of the joint is clearly demonstrated. On the right index there is no luxation of the shortened second phalanx. It remains as a distinct phalanx with two articulation surfaces. It is longer on the ulnar than on the radial side, thus giving the finger a typical bend. The other finger bones are normal. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are respectively 6 and 27 mm. on the right hand. On the left hand the longest diameter of the luxated II 2 is 8 (?) mm., but it looks as if this diameter represents the breadth and not the length of the affected phalanx. The length of IV 2 is 26 mm. on the left hand. 115.6cf C. S. H., who is genetically heterozygous and shows the B !-type brachyphalangy, married N. G. (b. Nov. 28, 1884) and has a son 1156.1 (p. 35). 115.79 L. H. (b. Apr. 19, 1882). She emigrated to the United States, where she married J. H. (b. Feb. 15, 1873), who is unrelated to her. One of us has had the opportunity of examining her hands and procuring the photographs and radiographs, figs. 2 and 37. As seen from these, her hands are in every respect perfectly normal. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are respectively 24 and 29 mm. on both hands. By her marriage she has 1 son; 1157.1 cf (p. 36). 115.8cf I. H. (b. June 15, 1885). He also emigrated to the United States and lives now in New York City. Photographs of his hands are given in figs. 11 and 12. They show a characteristic example of the B !-type of brachyphalangy. The right brachyphalangous index is bent, the left one is straight. The photographs from the inside of his hands show two grooves on the left index finger and only one on the right. The radiographs (fig. 42) explain why this happens. The malformation is seen to be strongly symmetrical in that it affects only the same bone on both hands, but the shortening is more pronounced in the left index. The shortened bone is somewhat longer on the ulnar than on the radial side. Both shortened phalanges have two articula- tion surfaces and articulate with the basal and the terminal phalanges. The length of II 2 and IV 2 are respectively 6 and 29 mm. on the right, 10 and 29 mm. on the left hand. In this case we also have been able to obtain a radiograph of the feet. It shows a marked symmetrical shortening of the second phalanges of the second toes; all other bones in the feet are normal. This man, who is genetically heterozygous for the factor for brachy- phalangy, married the normal 0. M. G. K. (b. Dec. 17, 1886). They have 1 son, 1158.1 cf (p. 36). Looking back on these children of the B!-type brachyphalangous ll.Scf by his second marriage with a normal wife, we find that 2 of the 6 children were unaffected, 1 showed the B-type brachyphalangy, and 3 the brachyphalangy of the B !-type like their father. 32 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. In this family we have secured exact information concerning the feet which proves that the brachyphalangy shows regular vertical correspondence, the two feet being symmetrically affected in exactly the same manner as the hands. LINE 1, V GENERATION. The fifth generation of line 1 includes 10 families, 3 of which descend from the normal 11.4 9 L. A. H. H. (p. 26), 7 from the brachypha- langous 11.5 cf C. A. B. H. (p. 26). FIRST FAMILY OF V GENERATION. 114.6d" H. H. had, by his marriage with M. E. B., 2 children, 1146.1 and 1146.2. 1146.1 9 G. H. (b. Sept. 22, 1883). She married bank treasurer C. C. (b. May 8, 1852) and had 2 children, 11461.1-11461.2 (p. 36). 1146.2 9 A. H. (b. Aug. 29, 1892). She married in 1917 secretary T. M. No children. SECOND FAMILY OF V GENERATION. 114.7 9 T. H. had, by her marriage with J. M. G. B., 8 children, 1147.1-1147.8. 1147.1 cf A. H. H. B. (b. Mar. 20, 1882). Unmarried. 1147.2 cf E. B. (b. Sept. 24, 1883). Unmarried. 1147.3 cf R. B. (b. Jan. 9, 1885). Married in 1916 B. L. R. No children. 1147.4 9 K. L. B. (b. Dec. 30, 1886). She married in 1910 con- sultant J. J. and has 2 children, 11474.1-11474.2 (p. 36). 1147.5 9 V. B. (b. Oct. 28, 1889). Unmarried. 1147.6 9 D. B. (b. July 19, 1891). Unmarried. 1147.7 cf G. B. (b. Jan. 30, 1894). Photographs and radiographs of his hands are obtained as a test. They show that his hands are normal in every respect. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are respectively 23 and 27 mm. on both hands. 1147.8 9 T. B. (b. Dec. 10, 1895). THIRD FAMILY OF V GENERATION. 114.8 cf A. H. had, by his marriage with A. A. L., 2 children, 1148.1 and 1148.2. 1148.1 9 B. H. (b. Mar. 12, 1901). 1148.2 9 A. H. (b. Oct. 10, 1902). The result of our investigation and of all information concerning these three families of the V generation, line 1, is to the effect that the members without exception had normal hands. To make a control test and to get material for our comparative measurements we secured the radiographs of one individual, 1 147.7 cf. This accords with the expectation which was based on the fact that 11.4 9 L. A. H. H. was genotypically free from the factor for brachyphalangy (cf. p. 26). FAMILY RECORD. 33 FOURTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The B-type brachyphalangous 115.1 9 E. G. H. had, by her mar- riage with 0. G., 3 children, 1151.1-1151.3. 1151. Id1 E. G. (Aug. 18, 1873-Apr. 4, 1902), technician. All the information is to the effect that he had normal hands, a statement that is confirmed by a photograph of his right hand. 1151.2 9 S. G. (b. July 16, 1876). All inquiries about her hands resulted in the statement that they were normal. This will easily be understood when looking at the photograph (fig. 13), showing the hands seen from the back. Aside from the missing of the right fourth finger, lost in an automobile accident, the hands on superficial examina- tion seem to be perfectly normal. From the volar side it is seen, however (fig. 14), that the distance between the two distal grooves on the indices, compared with the corresponding distance on the fourth fingers, is a little shorter than is the case in a normal hand. The radiographs (fig. 43) permit an exact measurement of the phalanges. II 2 on the right hand is 21 mm. On the left the lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 20 and 26 mm. respectively. It will be seen later, when we analyze the correlation between the lengths of these two phalanges in normal hands, that Pfitzner (1892, 1893), among 301 normal hands, has in one case found the same measures, 20 and 26 mm. Judged from this character, our individual might therefore be regarded as normal. The aspect of the inside of the indices, however, indicates that we here are dealing with a very extreme case of the B-type brachyphalangy. This view is supported by the fact that the individual is genetically heterozygous for the factor for brachyphalangy. She has a son, to be mentioned later, who shows the B !-type of the brachyphalangous condition, 11512.1 cf (pp. 36-37). The case illustrates the necessity of making extremely careful exami- nations in dealing with human material. Even where the inherited factor, when heterozygous, calls forth so striking alterations as in this case of brachyphalangy, we can still find cases where the heterozygous individuals, even after a careful examination, might be regarded as somatically normal. 1151.2 9 S. G married the unrelated factory owner 0. S. R. (b. July 16, 1865). She has 1 son, 11512.1 d* (pp. 36-37). 1151. 3 cf S. G. (b. Apr. 29, 1882), civil engineer. Photographs and radiographs of his hands show that he is free from brachyphalangy. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 25 and 30 mm. on the right, 25 and 29 mm. on the left hand. He married the unrelated J. A. (b. July 29, 1888) and has 1 daughter, 11513.1 9 (p. 37). Investigations as to this family show that the brachyphalangous 115.1 9 E. G. H. had two normal and 1 B-type brachyphalangous children. This proves that 115.1 9 herself was heterozygous for the factor for brachyphalangy (cf. p. 28). 34 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. FIFTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The normal 115.3 cf P. F. G. H. had, by his marriage with J. G., 3 children, 1153.1-1153.3. 1153.1 rf1 P. F. H. (b. Mar. 21, 1905). Photographs and radio- graphs of his hands prove that he is free from brachyphalangy. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 on both hands are 21 and 25 mm., respectively. 1153.2 9 S. E. H. (b. Mar. 12, 1907). Photographs and radio- graphs of her hands show that she is normal. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are on both hands 18 and 20 mm., respectively. 1153.3 9 E. R. H. (b. Jan. 1, 1910). Photographs and radiographs of her hands prove that she is free from brachyphalangy. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 on both hands 18 and 21 mm., respectively. All the children of this family have perfectly normal hands, which was to be expected from the examination of their father. SIXTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The B !-type brachyphalangous 115.4 cf M. H. has, by his marriage with the normal H. G., 1 daughter, 1154.1 9 . 1154.1 9 I. S. H. (b. May 9, 1905). A photograph of her hands (fig. 15) shows a typical case of symmetrical brachyphalangy of the indices. The radiographs (fig. 44) demonstrate that all the other finger bones are normal and give a good idea of how the brachypha- langous condition of the indices is brought about. While all the other bones of the hand still have their epiphysial cartilages, those of the second phalanges of the second fingers are already ossified, though the girl was only 12 years old when the plates were taken. This fact indicates that this case is to be regarded as belonging to the B !-type of brachyphalangy. While all the other phalanges keep on growing, the second ones of the indices remain short. This makes the difference between the lengths of II 2 and IV 2 far less striking than it will be in the adult individual. The actual lengths of II 2 and IV 2 in this case are 8 and 23 mm. respectively on the right hand, 10 and 23 mm. on the left hand. It will be noticed that the shortened phalanx of the right hand is markedly thicker than that of the left. Genetically this individual is heterozygous for the factor for brachy- phalangy. SEVENTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The B-type brachyphalangous 115.5 cT H. M. H. has, by his mar- riage with the normal D. K., 3 children, 1155.1-1155.2, a and 6, the two latter identical twins. 1155.1 9 (b. Mar. 26, 1913) died the day of birth. Parturition was complicated and the child had to be mutilated. Her father states that nothing is known regarding her hands. FAMILY RECORD. 35 1155.2 a 9 R. S. H. and 1155.26 9 I. J. H. are identical twins (b. Sept. 19, 1915). Genetically these two individuals are to be regarded as identical, a view that is supported in an interesting way by the fact that they both have brachyphalangous indices of exactly the same type. The photographs (figs. 16 and 17) showing their hands had to be taken under very unfavorable conditions, but still show the brachyphalangy fairly well. It has not been possible to take radiographs of the children, because they live in a distant community and nothing absolutely certain can therefore be said concerning the type of the malformation; but the fact that the photographs, which were taken when the children were a little more than two years old, already show a very marked shorten- ing of the indices makes it exceedingly probable that the shortening later will prove to be of the B !-type. Genetically the two children are heterozygous for the factor for brachyphalangy. Summing up, we find that the B-type brachyphalangous 115.5 cf had one child concerning whom no information is obtainable and two brachyphalangous twins, probably of the B !-type. These two indi- viduals have developed from one egg. When we later work out the numerical ratio between brachyphalangous and normal members of the families here studied, they will have to be counted as one individual. EIGHTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The B!-type brachyphalangous 115.6 cf C. S. H. has by his mar- riage with the normal N. G. one son, 1156.1 cf . On external examination and in photographs the hands of 1156.1 cf C. R. H. (b. May 23, 1907) look normal. The distance between the second and third grooves at the inside of the indices looks perhaps slightly shortened and the second phalanges of the indices seem to be a little narrower than usual in a normal hand. It can not be denied that the shape of the index fingers as a whole reminds one somewhat of the B-type brachyphalangy. The radiographs, however, give measures of the phalanges which fall well inside the limits of variation in normal hands. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 17 and 21 mm. on the right hand, 17 and 22 mm. on the left hand. The second phalanges of the indices are a little irregular, showing slightly oblique terminal articular surfaces; but the irregularities men- tioned are so slight that the examination as a whole leads to the result that 1156.1 cT is a normal individual, free from brachyphalangy. With the above-mentioned special features in mind it is perhaps safe, how- ever, to make a reservation until this conclusion can be confirmed by examination of the descendants of the individual. The investigation of 1151.2 9 explains why this reservation seems indicated. 36 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. NINTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The normal 115.7 9 L. H. has by her marriage with the normal J. H. one son, 1157.1 cf. 1157.1 d" R. H. G. H. (b. May 14, 1911). Photographs and radio- graphs of his hands show that he is normal, Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 on both hands are 14 and 17 mm. respectively. TENTH FAMILY OF V GENERATION. The B!-type brachyphalangous 115.8 cf I. H. has by his marriage with the normal O. M. G. K. one son, 1158.1 cf . 1158.1 cf H. L. H. (b. July 19, 1914). Photographs and radiographs of his hands show that he is normal. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 13 and 17 mm., respectively, on both hands. LINE 1, VI GENERATION. The sixth generation of line 1 so far includes 4 families, 2 of them belonging to the descendants of the normal 11.4 9 L. A. H. H. (p.26) and 2 to that of the B!-type brachyphalangous 11.5 rf C. A. B. H. (p. 26). FIRST FAMILY OF VI GENERATION. The normal 1146.1 9 G. H., by her marriage with the normal C. C., has 2 children, 11461.1 & P. C. (b. Aug. 17, 1913) and 11461.2 d* E. C. (b. June 7, 1916). SECOND FAMILY OF VI GENERATION. The normal 1147.4 9 K. L. B., by her marriage with the normal J. J., has 2 children, 11474.1 and 11474.2. 11474.1 c? K. L. J. (b. May 29, 1911). Photographs and radiographs of his hands were provided as a test. They prove that he is quite normal. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 13 and 16 mm., respectively, on the right hand, 14 and 16 mm. on the left hand. 11474.2 9 R. B. J. (b. Sept. 27, 1913). The examination proves that all these four individuals, descendants of 11.4 9 L. A. H. H., are perfectly normal. In one case radiographs and photographs are given as a control. We have now followed the total descendants of this individual, 11.4 9, through three generations. Though she was a daughter of the brachyphalangous 1.1 9, her hands were normal (see p. 26). In accordance with the expectation all the 28 individuals descended from her have been found to be normal, free from the factor for brachy- phalangy. THIRD FAMILY OF VI GENERATION. The B-type brachyphalangous 2251.2 9 S. G., by her marriage with the normal O. S. R., has a son, 11512.1 d". 11512.1 cT O. R. (b. Apr. 5, 1898). A photograph of his hands is given in fig. 18. It shows a typical case of the B !-type brachypha- FAMILY RECORD. 37 langy and needs no special description. The radiographs (fig. 45) show the degree of the shortening. The second phalanges of the indices are reduced to very short bones with two surfaces in articulation with the I and III phalanx. In this case we were able to secure radiographs from the feet also. They show exactly the same shortening of the second phalanges of the toes, a further control of the fact stated above that the brachyphalangy shows vertical correspondence. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 of the right hand are 9 and 28 mm. respectively, and on the left hand 8 and 27 mm. This individual is genetically heterozygous for brachyphalangy. He represents the sixth generation of brachyphalangous individuals among the descendants of 1 9 M. K. H. We have been able to trace the inheritance of the malformation without any break from her (1 9 ), through 1.1 9, 11.5 cf, 115.1 9,1151.2 9 to the family member in question (11512.1). All of these were brachyphalangous and genet- ically heterozygous for the factor. Among them are the most pro- nounced cases of the B !-type of the malformation (11.5 cf) as well as of the B-type (1151.2 9). FOURTH FAMILY OP VI GENERATION. The normal 1151.3 c? S. G., by his marriage with the normal J. A., has 1 daughter, 11513.1 9 . 11513.1 9 E. G. (b. Oct. 10, 1911). Photographs and radiographs prove that she is normal. Lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 16 and 19 mm., respectively, on the right hand, 16 and 18 mm. on the left. We have now given a complete family record concerning all mem- bers of line 1 and line 7, including in all 58 individuals. As already mentioned we have not yet worked out any of the other lines to the same extent. In one of the lines, line 9, where brachy- phalangy occurs, we have secured material (photographs and radio- graphs) of the hands of members of the IV, V, and VI generation that are now living. These are of special interest because they furnish valuable data for a comparative study of the two types of the mal- formation we are dealing with. This supplementary material will now be presented. The discussion of the facts obtained will be post- poned until this is done. LINE 9. The B !-type brachyphalangous 1.9 c? F. J. 0. (II generation, p. 24), by his marriage with the unrelated C. R., from Asker near Chris- tiania, had 9 children, 19.1-19.9 (III generation). One of them, 19.4 9 L. E. 0. (Nov. 10, 1838-Nov. 25, 1908), married in 1857 the normal L. J. A., a builder. They had by their marriage 10 children, 38 A NEW TYPE OF BRACHYPHALANGY IN MAN. representing the third family of the IV generation, line 9. We have been able to examine several of these individuals and their descendants of the V and VI generation. Only this part of the line 9 will here be treated. The children of 19.4 9 L. E. 0. state that their mother had normal fingers. That she, however, must have been heterozygous for the factor for brachyphalangy is clear in view of the fact that several of the children are brachyphalangous. We may accordingly safely con- clude that she had the B-type of the malformation. LINE 9, IV GENERATION. THIRD FAMILY OF IV GENERATION. This family comprises the 10 children of 19.4 9 L. E. 0. and her unrelated husband, L. J. A., 194.1-194.10. To avoid confusion we may mention that several of these individuals later changed their last name. This is the reason why the last initial differs within the same family. 194.1 9 C. F. A. (b. June 9, 1859) emigrated to Minnesota, where she married farmer F. No children. Replying to inquiries concerning her fingers, she answers in a letter : "Both my index fingers are a little shortened. The second phalanx is shortened. Mother had not shortened fingers, but an uncle had like mine." It is clear from this description that she has the B-type brachyphalangy, a view that is confirmed by the entirely different way in which she described the index fingers of her niece, 1942.1 9 J. G., who has the B !-type brachyphalangy (p. 40). 194.2 cf A. K. A. G. (b. Sept. 22, 1860) manager of a restaurant, Bergen, Norway. The photographs (figs. 19, 20) and radiographs (fig. 46) of his hands represent a typical case of the B-type of brachy- phalangy and need no further description. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 17 and 26 mm. respectively on both hands. Aside from the second phalanges of the indices, the other bones of the hand are normal. This man married twice. By his first marriage he has a daughter 1942.1 9 . By his second marriage with the normal, unrelated A. E. M. (b. Jan. 30, 1880), he has 4 children 1942.2-1942.5 (pp. 40-41). 194.3 cf E. A. L. (b. Sept. 3, 1862), manager, Bergen, Norway. Photographs of his hands are given in figs. 21, 22. Seen from the dorsal side they could easily be regarded as normal. The photograph of the volar surface, however, in connection with the radiograph (fig. 47), reveals a clear case of B-type brachyphalangy. The lengths of II 2 and IV 2 are 22 and 30 mm. respectively on both hands. E. A. L. married the normal, unrelated A. M. S. (b. Aug. 9, 1865) and has 5 children, 1943.1-1943.5 (pp. 41-42). 194.4 9 K. O. A. (Sept. 25, 1864r-1914). Emigrated to Alaska, where she married the unrelated J. O. and had 4 children, 1944.1-1944.4. No information concerning her own or her children's hands has been available. FAMILY RECORD. 39 194.5 9 L. E. A. (b. Apr. 29, 1866) emigrated to Oregon and married the unrelated driver E. She has 6 children, 1945.1-1945.6 (p. 42). In a letter she states that her own hands are normal, but that one of her sons has shortened index fingers. Her description of his hands is, however, very confused and it is only with great reservation we may assume that she is heterozygous for brachyphalangy while we lack a more exact description and photographs of her hands and those of her son. 194.6 9 V. H. A. (b. May 18, 1868) Christiania, Norway. We have examined this individual and found that her hands are normal. She married the normal L. and has a son. We have not examined his hands, but his relatives state that they are normal, which was to be expected. 194.7 9 S. A., Christiania, Norway. Photographs of her hands are given in fig. 21 and fig. 22. The III and IV fingers on one hand were injured by an accident. Also in this case the hands when seen from the dorsal surface would easily be regarded as normal. As seen from the volar surface, however, the second phalanges of the indices are markedly shortened, judging from the distance between the second and third grooves. The radiographs (fig. 48) prove definitely the brachyphalangous condition, the lengths of II 2 and IV 2 being 18 and 28 mm. respect- ively on both hands. Like both her older brothers, she has the B-type of brachyphalangy. She married Aa. and has a daughter, 1947.1 (p. 43). 194.8 .— 1H4.7 9 S. Aa. FIG. 26.— 194.7 9 S. Aa, FIG. 27.— 1942.1 9 J. G. FIG. 28.— 1942.5 c? A. M. G FIG. 28.— 1943.1 9 E. S. L. FIG. 34.— 1943.5 9 E. S. L. FlO. 35.— 1947.1 9 E FIG. 36.— 1947.1 9 E. Aa. FIG. 37.— 115.7 9 L. H. FIG. 38.— 19421.3 tf R. F. H. FIG. 39.— 11.5 cT C. A. B. H. FIG. 40.— 115.4 tf M. H. FIG. 41.— 115.6 rf1 C. S. H. FIG. 42.— 115.8 rf1 T. H. FIG. 43.— 1151.2 9 S. G. FIG. 44.— 1154.1 9 I. S. H. Fus. 45.— 11512.1 cT O. R. FIG. 46.— 194.2 rf1 A. K. A. G. FIG. 47.— 194.3 d" E. A. L. FIG. 48.— 194.7 9 S. A. PLATE Fn;. 49.— 194.8 tf H. 0. FIG. 50.— 194.8 cf H. 0. iHl/y^g FIG. 51.— 91942.1 J. G. FIG. 52.— 1942.5 d" A. M. G. FIG. c3.— 1943.1 d* E. A. L. FIG. 54.— 1943.4 9 E. M. L. FIG. 55.— 1943.5 9 E. S. L. FIG. 56.— 1947.1 9 E. Aa. THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ SCIENCE LIBRARY This book is due on the last DATE stamped below. To renew by phone, call 459-2050. Books not returned or renewed within 14 days after due date are subject to billing. Series 2477 3 2106 00252 2164