II B R.AR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY Of ILLINOIS 590.5 v. 35 coo- 3 matural history su&veV 5 S .■3 NOTES ON AFRICAN BULBULS FAMILY PYCNONOTIDAE: CLASS AVES AUSTIN L. RAND FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY VOLUME 35, NUMBER 6 Published by iPT 2 \ i CB?£AGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1958 NOTES ON AFRICAN BULBULS FAMILY PYCNONOTIDAE: CLASS AVES AUSTIN L. RAND Chief Curator, Department of Zoology FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY VOLUME 35, NUMBER 6 Published by CHICAGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1958 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 58-18825 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY CHICAGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PRESS I/. 3^ 2 African Bulbuls The following notes on the classification and taxonomy of bulbuls were brought together in the course of preparing the section on Afri- can bulbuls for the continuation of Peters' Check-list. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the help of various persons in lend- ing specimens and in other ways, especially the help of Dr. Dean Amadon and Dr. C. Vaurie of the American Museum of Natural History, Mr. P. A. Clancey of the Durban Museum, Mr. H. Deig- nan and Dr. H. Friedmann of the United States National Museum, Mr. J. C. Green way of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Dr. R. E. Moreau of the Edward Grey Institute, Oxford, and Dr. J. G. Williams of the Coryndon Museum. Among the collections available in Chicago Natural History Museum and especially important in this survey should be men- tioned the van Someren collection of East African birds, acquired in 1950, and the A. I. Good collection of Cameroon birds, the property of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History but on deposit here. Generic limits. — The generic allocation of the greenish and yel- lowish olive bulbuls has always been troublesome, but fortunately we have Delacour's (1943, Zoologica, 28: 17-28) review of the fam- ily at the genus and species level. My treatment for the African forms differs from Delacour's in the following: Neolestes, which Delacour does not include as a bulbul, seems best included (see Chapin, 1953, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist, 75A: 154). Tylas, which Delacour also excludes from the bulbuls, I have retained for lack of a better place for it. Besides the other genera Delacour discussed, two others are occa- sionally placed in the bulbuls: Suaheliornis has been placed in the Pycnonotidae by some auth- ors (Mackworth-Praed and Grant, 1955, Bds. E. and N. E. Afr., 2: 134). In some ways it recalls Phyllastrephus, but it seems still closer to the Sylviidae genus Macrosphenus, which itself seems a hetero- geneous group. 145 146 FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY, VOLUME 35 Lioptilornis (genotype nigricapillus Vieillot) has been called a bulbul by Vincent (1952, Checklist Bds. So. Afr., p. 65), but it seems better considered a timaline, as Delacour (1946, L'Oiseau, 16: 30) and Chapin have considered it. The genera and species of African bulbuls that I recognize are as follows: Pycnonotus, 15 species (others in Asia); Calyptocichla, 1; Baeopogon, 2; Ixonotus, 1; Chlorocichla, 5; Thescelocichla, 1; Phylla- strephus, 22; Bleda, 3; Nicator, 3; Criniger, 4; Microscelis, 1 (others in Asia); Neolestes, 1; and Tylas, 1; i.e., in Africa, I recognize 13 genera (5 of which are monotypic) and 60 species. Sclater (1930, Syst. Av. Aethiop.) recognized 25 genera (12 of them monotypic) and 70 spe- cies, with certain of these species (now in Phyllastrephus) in the Timiliidae and certain genera (Nicator, Neolestes) in the Laniidae. Sclater recognized 15 species which I consider subspecies, and four of his subspecies I consider species. One species, Phyllastrephus orostruthus Vincent, 1933, was described after Sclater's Systema was published. Pycnonotus barbatus group This group wholly or in part has been reviewed a number of times, notably by Hartert (1906, Nov. Zool., 13: 389, 392), Zedlitz (1916, Jour. f. Orn., 1916: 68), Sclater and Praed (1918, Ibis, 1918: 697), Gyldenstolpe (1924, K. Sv. Vet. Akad. Handl., (3), 1, no. 3, p. 189), Sclater (1930, Syst. Av. Aethiop., p. 369), Friedmann (1937, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 153: 105), Chapin (1953, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 75A: 147), Meinertzhagen (1954, Birds of Arabia, p. 179), and White (1956, Bull. Brit. Orn. CI., 76: 155-157). There is a great diversity of opinion as to the specific limits in this group. Some put them all in one species: others make a num- ber of species of them. I recognize four species: xanthopygos, capen- sis, nigricans, and barbatus. These four forms are nearly, if not completely, geographical representatives. But no intergrading or hybrid populations connecting them are known. The first three species are monotypic. The fourth has many subspecies, some very different from the others, but hybrid or intergrading populations between them all are demonstrated so that all must be conspecific. Pycnonotus xanthopygos Ehrenberg, 1833 Though sometimes considered conspecific with P. barbatus — and stray individuals have been taken in Egypt, in the range of P. bar- batus arsinoe (Meinertzhagen, 1954, Bds. Arabia, p. 179) — no inter- RAND: AFRICAN BULBULS 147 mediate or hybrid populations appear to exist. In characters of color and of eye wattle, xanthopygos is more like the South African P. capensis or P. nigricans than it is the geographically adjacent P. b. arsinoe. A specific status seems indicated. Three races have been recognized at various times. A reading of the literature and an examination of a small number of skins inclines me to accept Meinertzhagen's (loc. cit.) view that no races can be recognized. For form of citation and date, see Zimmer (1926, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Zool. Ser., 16: 204, and references therein). Pycnonotus nigricans Vieillot, 1818 Sclater (1930, Syst. Av. Aethiop., p. 370) considers harterti Zed- litz, 1916, a race of nigricans, following his review of 1918 (Ibis, p. 698), and a trinomial is still commonly used for P. nigricans in South Africa. However, the type series of harterti was examined by Gyldenstolpe (1924, Kungl. Sv. Vetenskapsakad. Handl., (3), 1, no. 3, p. 190), who found it to be without eye wattles, closely related to tricolor, not nigricans (see under P. b. tricolor), a view that Austin Roberts put forward a number of times. Apparently P. nigricans has no subspecies. The overlap in range of P. nigricans with P. barbatus may be only seasonal, but as no in- termediate populations are known in the comparatively well-worked South African area, specific status seems indicated for nigricans. Pycnonotus barbatus Desfontaine, 1789 Chapin's treatment (1953, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 75A: 147-154) of this species is the best to date. The birds that I include here have sometimes been included with xanthopygos, nigricans and capensis under the oldest name, xantho- pygos, and at the other extreme even in recent years have been di- vided into several species. For instance, in 1930, Sclater divided what is here considered barbatus into four species. Within this species, in general appearance, the following three groups are evi- dent: barbatus group: under tail coverts white; northern Africa. tricolor group: under tail coverts yellow; central and southern Africa. dodsoni group: under tail coverts yellow; back and breast more or less patterned ; eastern Kenya. 148 FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY, VOLUME 35 However, none of these can be kept as species, as barbatus and tricolor intergrade or hybridize in Gabon, and tricolor and dodsoni intergrade in three known areas in Kenya. Other attempts to further subdivide the complex into species have been based on interpreta- tions of intergrading populations. White (1956, Bull. Brit. Orn. CI., 76: 155-157) most recently has discussed the variation within this species. He outlines six "primary subspecies" and some of the "secondary subspecies" and ignores others. It seems that a review of the material available is advisable. It should be kept in mind in studying this species that the change from fresh plumage to worn, sun-faded body plumage is very great. Pycnonotus barbatus barbatus Desfontaine, 1789 Our specimens from Morocco, Algeria, and Tangier measure: Wing, 18, 18, 18.5, 18.5, 19, 19, 20 mm.), but in the latter it is somewhat more slender, as noted in the literature. However, in color our specimens show this to be a fairly distinct race. Comparing fairly fresh-plumaged birds, such as those from Djibouti and Bale, with similar plumaged birds ( schoanus) from Amhara and Sidamo, the upper parts are paler, due to more pro- nounced paler edgings to the feathers; the whitish fleck back of the auriculars is larger and more conspicuous; the pale edgings to the otherwise dark feathers of the lower breast are more conspicuous; the dark of the upper breast tends to continue onto the lower breast in a streaked pattern; and the tail feathers have vaguely defined but larger pale tips. Taken together, these characters make somaliensis a fairly dis- tinct race. It is interesting that the more scaled pattern with incip- ient streaks on the breast and the more pronounced white fleck back of the auriculars are trends in the direction of the yellow-vented dodsoni that replaces it to the south. Further, the only immature- plumaged bird in the series, from Luku, Bale, a locality from which we also have two white-vented adults, has pale yellow under tail coverts. If this is constant in the immature it would be another racial character for somaliensis and a further indication of the close relationship with dodsoni. The range of P. b. somaliensis is thus French Somaliland, western British Somaliland, and southeastern Abyssinia (to eastern Arusi and northeastern Bale) . It probably occurs also in southern Harar, RAND: AFRICAN BULBULS 151 but not in the Hawash Valley (Dire Daoua, etc.) where Friedmann (op. cit., p. 113) records schoanus. Pycnonotus barbatus nigeriae Hartert, 1921 Compared with inornatus to the northeast, the birds in the area from southern Nigeria and central and southern Cameroon to east- ern Gabon are characterized by having darker heads, backs and upper breasts; the white of the belly contrasting more sharply with the dark breast; and under tail coverts usually faintly tinged yellow. These are the birds I refer to nigeriae, restricting the name gabonen- sis to the birds from Gabon, in which the yellow of the under tail coverts is about half way between the nearly white condition of nigeriae and the bright yellow condition of tricolor. The range of nigeriae has been variously given as only in Nigeria, or from Nigeria east to Gabon. This seems due to difference of viewpoint: some authors seem to have regarded birds with any yel- low tinge in the under tail coverts as gabonensis and only birds with pure white under tail coverts as nigeriae, while the range of nigeriae has been extended southward on the basis of the fact that the yellow tinge of the under tail coverts is not observable in field identification. Examining a series of six topotypes of nigeriae from Degama, Lower Niger, I find the under tail coverts are slightly tinged yellow or edged yellow in two specimens and fairly heavily in one other, as much so as in birds from as far east as parts of western Gabon. Birds that differ little, if at all, from the southern Nigeria birds in the amount of yellow in the under tail coverts are represented in our series as follows: British Cameroon: Buea, 1. French Cameroon: Yabassi, 1; Sannaga River, 2; Yaoundi, 1; Edolowa, 6; Bitye, Ja River, 4; Tibati, 1; Ngaoundere, 1 (back slightly paler than others). Spanish Guinea: Corisco Island, 2. Gabon, Cape Esterias, 5; Mouila, 3; Labamba, 1; M'Bigou, 3; Tchibanga, 2; Mimongo, 8 (7 nigeriae-Uke, 1 tricolor-like). In southeastern Cameroon and in certain localities in Gabon occur mixed populations whose allocation to either nigeriae or gabo- nensis may be questioned ; they seem closer to the latter, as discussed under gabonensis. The pale back of the Ngaoundere bird men- tioned above is an indication of intergradation with goodi of north- ern Cameroon. 152 FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY, VOLUME 35 Despite the acknowledged intergradation of the barbatus and the tricolor group through gabonensis, the occurrence within the range of nigeriae of occasional specimens of the tricolor type with bright yellow under tail coverts, such as those recorded from near Ngaoun- dere and from Lolodorf by Bannerman (1951, Bds. Trop. West Afr., 8: 382), might be considered an argument for keeping tricolor and barbatus as species. However, another interpretation of this occa- sional occurrence of individuals resembling one subspecies within the range of another is that it is a case of extreme variation of the local population (Rand, 1948, Auk, 65: 416), a view that is adopted here. Pycnonotus barbatus gabonensis Sharpe, 1871 This name I restrict to the birds with pale yellow under tail coverts, more or less half way between the faintly yellow-tinged white under tail coverts of nigeriae and the bright yellow ones of tricolor. Except for the under tail coverts these three forms are very similar. Birds that show such an intermediate condition are represented in our collection from the following localities: Cameroon: Sangmelima, 2; Yokadouma, 4. Gabon: Fenian Vaz, 4. Though the southeastern Cameroon birds are more yellowish than most nigeriae specimens, they are not as yellow as exact in- termediates would be. Of the four Fernan Vaz birds one is an exact intermediate nigeriae X tricolor, one is nearly typical nigeriae, and the other two fall between. This suggests that southeastern Came- roon and parts of northwestern Gabon are on the north and west edge of the band of direct intergradation of tricolor-nigeriae. Its southern extent is probably in extreme southwestern French Middle Congo (between Brazzaville and Dolisie; see Malbrant and Ma- clatchy, 1949, Faune de L'Equat. Afr. Franc, 1, Oiseau, p. 301). That this is a narrow band is indicated by the fact that our Middle Congo specimens from Impfondo, Gamboma, and Djambala are typical tricolor, and those from central and southern Gabon (Mouila, Labamba, M'Bigou, Tchibanga) are nearly typical nigeriae. Its range is thus central coastal Gabon and from extreme south- ern French Congo to extreme southeastern Cameroon. Our specimens suggest that this area is not characterized by a uniformly intermediate but by a highly variable population perhaps better considered a mixed population resulting from the hybridiza- tion of two species, tricolor and barbatus. However, nigeriae is also an inornatus-tricolor intergrade in characters other than the under RAND: AFRICAN BULBULS 153 tail coverts; it has the dark general color of tricolor and a tinge of yellow on the under tail coverts, both tendencies toward tricolor, and it seems best to consider gabonensis as another population in- termediate between subspecies. The name gabonensis is thus applied to an intermediate popula- tion, as intended by Sharpe in his original description. Pycnonotus barbatus tricolor Hartlaub, 1862 This race differs sharply from all those preceding in having the under tail coverts bright yellow. Otherwise it is very similar in color and size to P. b. gabonensis and nigeriae, with which it intergrades over a long narrow area in Gabon, as discussed under gabonensis. The range is from northern South West Africa (an old record only) and southern Angola to the French Middle Congo, the Cen- tral Congo basin, Kivu Highlands, southern Uganda, eastern shore of Lake Tanganyika, western Tanganyika, and northern Northern Rhodesia. The type locality was restricted to northern Angola by Zedlitz in 1916. As mentioned above, this race intergrades on the northwest with gabonensis; on the north it intergrades over a large area with minor; to the east it intergrades with the small black-headed micrus, through populations that look like fayi; to the east and south it intergrades with the black-headed races micrus and layardi, through populations that look like fayi, and through ngamii. The following four names are synonyms: Pycnonotus tricolor tanganjicae Reichenow, 1911, from the north end of Lake Tanganyika (see Chapin, 1953, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist, 75A:150). P. b. harterti Zedlitz, 1916, Jour. f. Orn., 64: 71; type locality Huilla, Mossamedes; described as like tricolor but larger; forehead and top of head darker; under wing coverts more brown ish- tinged ; wing, d" 104-105; 9 96-102 (tricolor wing, d" 92-99; 9 88-90 mm.); range, Mossamedes and Benguella, intergrading with tricolor far- ther north. Sclater and Praed (Ibis, 1918, p. 698) refer this form to the nigri- cans group, saying that it has an eye wattle, though the feature is not as pronounced as in nigricans. Roberts (1935, Ann. Trans. Mus., 16: 130) says it is a race of tricolor. Apparently both species occur in southern Angola. Hartert (1906, Nov. Zool., 13: 391) recorded nigricans with bright eye wat- 154 FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY, VOLUME 35 ties from Benguella, whence he also recorded two specimens with bare, protruding, but dark eyelids; and I have examined specimens of tricolor from Mossamedes. There seems little reason to doubt that the name harterti was actually based on specimens of the species tricolor, and Gyldenstolpe (1924, Kungl. Sv. Vetenskaps. Handl., (3), 1, no. 3, p. 190), who examined the type series, referred them to P. tricolor [=barbatus] harterti, rather than nigricans. For comparison I have the following specimens: Mossamedes (Capelongo), 4; Benguella, 6 (Dondi, 4, Chitau, 2) and Loanda, 6 (Golunga-Alta, 4, Luanda, 2). Measurements: wing, Mossamedes 83. Culmen, 9 [= Uganda, 101-106; Cameroon, 99-108; Gabon, 104, 106). It seems inadvisable to recognize chlorosaturata on the slight aver- age difference. Two Angola females (wing, 101, 106 mm. ; tail, 79, 82) are apparently in first year plumage with rather narrow pointed rec- trices. Compared with Cameroon birds, they are slightly clearer gray, with less greenish wash or bufly tinge below, and colder, less olive green above. Part at least of this difference is probably due to the freshness of the Angola birds (collected in 1954). RAND: AFRICAN BULBULS 187 Chlorocichla falkensteini Reichenow The Cameroon and the Angola populations of this west African species are generally kept separate as two subspecies. Chapin (1953, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 75 A: 138), while recognizing the two subspecies and characterizing the Cameroon bird, viridescentior Sharpe, as having deeper green upper parts and more gray on the chest and flanks than C. f. falkensteini Reichenow of the Loango Coast, etc., says that the differences in color are almost negligible. We have seven adult Angola birds, collected in 1908 (Ansorge), 1952 (Beatty), and 1954 (Heinrich), and nine Cameroon birds col- lected in 1924-27 (Bates) and 1941-52 (Good). The older birds in both series show the characters attributed to falkensteini and the recently collected birds those of viridescentior. Between birds of comparable age of skin from the two localities I can see no color differences. Evidently this species changes considerably through museum age (foxing). The following measurements show no differences except a very slight average smaller bill size of Cameroon birds: Angola: d* Wing, 88, 93, 93, 93, 94, 94. Tail, 78, 79, 81, 81, 82, 85. Culmen, 19 (5), 20 (1). 9 Wing, 87. Tail, 78. Culmen, 19. Cameroon: 9 Wing, 92, 92, 92. Tail, 83, 83, 84, 85. Culmen, 18, 19, 19. 9 Wing, 85, 87, 87, 88, 92. Tail, 74, 75, 80, 82. Cul- men, 17 (2), 18 (1), 19 (1). It is impossible to recognize any races in this species. The original description is sometimes quoted from a source that is incorrect (Correspondenzbl. Afr. Gesellsch., no. 10, p. 179), for Grant and Mackworth-Praed (1955, Bull. Brit. Orn. CI., 75: 24) show that this was published in December, 1874, while another de- scription (Jour. f. Orn., 22: 458) was published in October, 1874, and therefore takes precedence. Chlorocichla simplex Hartlaub When I reported on a series of Liberia birds (1951, Fieldiana: Zool., 32: 619) I had but two Cameroon birds. Now with an addi- tional 30 birds from Cameroon and three from Angola certain other points emerge. There is considerable variation in color in the series of Cameroon birds. About half the series has the under parts generally distinctly washed with yellowish, the flanks, and especially the under tail coverts buffy, and the upper parts slightly brownish-olive; the other 188 FIELDIANA: ZOOLOGY, VOLUME 35 half tends to have the under parts less yellow-tinged, flanks less buffy, under tail coverts paler, and upper parts more dusky. These last include all the worn birds and I assume that most if not all of this difference is due to wear and fading in life, though the effects of wear on feather structure is pronounced on only a few specimens. The birds in first year plumage are very similar to the adult ex- cept for the more pointed tail feathers, the more olive-brown outer margins to the remiges, a few brownish-margined lesser upper wing coverts, and the retention of some fuzzy under tail coverts. Birds from Liberia (12) and Angola (3) agree well with the corre- sponding stage of plumage of Cameroon birds. There is no difference in size of adults: Liberia: Wing, tf1 104-109; 9 95-100. Tail,