ON THE

I1CA

OF GUATEMALA.

PROF. DANIEL GT. BRINTON, M. D.

(Head before the American Philosophical Society, October 17,

Bancroft Library

On the Language and Ethnologic Position of the Xinca Indians of Guate- mala. By Dr. Daniel G. Brinton.

(Read before the American Philosophical Society, October 17, 1884. )

In the aboriginal ethnology of Guatemala, the affiliations of the Xinca tribe have always remained uncertain. The opinion is expressed by Dr. Stoll (Zur Ethnographic der Republik Guatemala, p. 170, Zurich, 1884) that an investigation of their language might throw a new light on the migrations of the ancient inhabitants of that region.

Up to the present time, however, no words of their language have been published, and students have had no means of comparing it with the dia- lects which surrounded them. I am fortunate enough to be able to sup- ply this deficiency to a moderate extent, and to offer sufficient materials to form some opinion as to this people.

Their precise location was on the Rio de los Esclavos and its branches, which empties into the Pacific ocean, about N. lat. 13° 50', W. long. 90° 25', and westward to the Rio Michatoyat. Their area embraced most of the departments of Santa Rosa and Jutiapa, and may roughly be said to have extended about fifty miles along the coast, and back to the Sierra some sixty miles.

On the west they were bordered by the Pipiles, of Aztec lineage, speak- ing a Nahuatl dialect not much corrupted ; on their north were the Poko- mams, who belonged to the Maya stock, and on their east was a colony of Popolucas, a tribe supposed to have been related to the Mixes of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.

Their name hg,s been variously spelled, Xinca, Xinka and Sine a. The first given is correct, the initial X having the value of the soft English sh, $8 in thow.

According to tfye Geagrafia d.e las Lenguas Maya-J£iche, MS. of Dr.

Berendt, the Xinca is or was spoken in the following towns or villages in the district mentioned :

Atescatempa, Mustiquipaque,

Atiquipaque, Nancinta,

Chiquimulilla. Sinacantan,

Comapa, Tacuilula,

Guazacapam, Taxisco,

Ixguatan, Tepeaco,

Jupiltepeque, Tescuaco,

Jutiapa, Tupitepeque.

The first information about the Xincas is contained in the letter of Pedro de Alvarado to Hernan Cortes, dated July 28, 1524.* He there describes his conquest of their territory in the previous winter. Further particulars of the campaign are given by Juarros, in his Historia de Guatemala, Tom. ii, Tratado iv, Cap. xxii, from the MSS. of Fuentes.

From these sources we learn that Alvarado first encountered the Xincas after he had crossed the River Michatoyat and entered the town Atiqui- paque (Atiepar, in Alvarado's letter, who makes as much havoc with the native names as he did with their armies).

In this town he particularly states that he met another people and a dif- ferent language from those he had just left ("este es otra lengua y gente por si ").

Thence he proceeded to Tacuilula and Taxisco, not encountering deter- mined opposition, as Juarros erroneously says, as Alvarado informs us that the natives received him without fighting, but fled in the night to the forests. After leaving Taxisco, however, they attacked him in force and slew many of his allies.

The chief town of the Xinca would seem to have been either Nancinta (the " Nacendelan, pueblo muy grande " of Alvaraclo's letter) or according to Juarros, Guazacapam. In this vicinity a determined stand was made by the Indians, and they caused the Spaniards and their allies much trouble by digging pitfalls, and by planting the paths with sharpened sticks said to be poisonous. What puzzled the Spaniards was that these natives during their fighting held in their hands small bells with which they made as much noise as possible. Probably they were intended either as charms, or to alarm the enemy.

Juarros adds that these tribes were not conquered by Alvarado's incur- sion. It required renewed efforts by Don Pedro Portocarrero, in 1526, to. bring them under subjection.

On account of their obstinacy, numbers of them were sold as slaves and branded with a hot iron, and hence was derived the Spanish name of the river on which the Xincas lived, Rio de los Esclavos, Slave river.

Very few hints as to their social condition are found in the early

* I quote it as published in the Bibliqtecq de aulpres EspaHoleSj Vol. xxij, Madrid, 185?.

accounts. Their country is stated to have been populous, their towns built of wood and not of stone, they were skillful with the bow and arrow, and were bold warriors. They formed small independent tribes united in a sort of confederacy, the "cabeza desenorio," or chief clan, being at "the famous town of Guazacapam, " and its four dependents or allies are named as,

Nestiquipaque, Guaimango, and

Chiquimulilla, Guanagazapa.

The linguistic materials I offer are vocabularies of three dialects of the Xinca.

The first, from Sinacantan, was obtained from a native of that place by the distinguished historian and antiquary, Don Juan Gavarrete, of Guate- mala, in 1868. The other two were obtained for him in the same year by Don Sebastian Yaldez, Cura of Jutiapa. As according to Dr. Stoll, the originals of these have disappeared, no one knows where, since Senor Gavarrete's death, the present publication seems the more appropriate* presenting as it does the only specimens of the Xinca language known to be in existence. I would not omit to add that they came into my hands, together with other valuable documents, in the collection of the late Dr. C. Hermann Berendt.

Phonology of the Xinca.

The language is vocalic, and with few gutturals or harsh palatals, con- trasting in this respect with the Cakchiquel and other Maya dialects. The labials, b, f, and v, are absent, although b is foun d in two or three words of the accompanying vocabulary. The linguals are not prominent, the d and th not appearing at all. The semi-vowels r and I are convertible in the dialects and occasionally alternate with n.

In the vocabularies, the letters have the powers of the Spanish alphabet, except that x is pronounced like sh in she, the •» is the neutral vowel as in but, the z is the same as the s, and the compounds csh and seh appear to have the value of the x (= sh).

Bancroft Library

Vocabulary of the Xinca Language.

LoCAiaxr. Sinacantan. Jupiltepeque. Jutiapa.

Man, jurac, jumu, jurgaqui.

Woman, ayala, aya, aiya.

Boy, xurum, sorone, soroni.

Father, tatan, tataj, tataj.

Mother, utan, utaj, ' utac.

Son, najuum, nauij, naguij.

Daughter, jaya najuun, naguij

Brother, xuyam, keruke, suyac.

Head, jamatan, usajle, gesalia.

Hair, muxjumatan, mosal, musal.

Eyes, jurtin, juratii, yuratica,

		4
LOCALITY.	Sinacantan.	Jupiltepeque.	Juitiapa.
Nose,	jutu narin,		narica.
Nostril.	uona narin,		lurate.
Ear,	maman,	mami,	manca.
Mouth,	xa'jan,	xajac,	sajac.
Tongue,	ejlan,	ela,	eglajac.
Teeth,	jari xa'jan,		sajac.
Throat,	ta'tam,		tarti.
Breast,	ziquim,	tutu,
Arm,	pum,	paja,	paja'.
Hand,	jixi pum,	pu,	puj.
Fingers,	mux,	pere pu,	pere puj.
Belly,	jiguin,	ururi,	ururi.
Leg,	titan,	kegiie,	uapi.
Knee,	jaricomon,	sulna,
Foot,	uapan,	uapi,	guapi.
Town,	machiname,	saguqui,	saguqui.
House,	macu,		macu.
Bed,	a'tac,	alutu,	alutaj.
Hamack,	guaro,		guaro.
Mortar (mill stone)	,uiki,	uik,	uic.
Plate,	aulac	aljuat,	augeal.
Jar	erec		P1*PP
Fire,	uray,	uu'ra,	C1CO. icura'.
Water,	ni,		huy.
Maize,	aima,		ahua.
Ear of maize,			aima.
Bean,	xin'ac,	sicna,	cshidna.
Salt,	tita,		tila.
Hat,	ta'yuc,		tayuc.
Breeches,	xu'nan,	asuna,	asiuna.
Paper,	papooc,	papu,	popoque.
Heaven (sky),	uina,		giiigna.
Snn,	pari,	parri,	parri.
Moon,	agua,		ahua.
Star,	xune,	hueso,	gueso.
Day,	pari,	ti parri,	ti parri.
Night,	chamazOToa,	chijmac,	schugmac.
Wind,	tan,	una,	yeuha.
River,	xanjui,	tire,	ture.
Hill,	naguona,	kerter,	querter.
Woods,	jaragua,	casagua,	caragua.
Road,	tasma,	talma,	talma.
Cornfield,	uaya'a,	uayaaj,	guaya'.
Earth (land),	naro,	narro,	narro.
Stone,	jixi,	ixe,	gicshe.

LOCALITY.	Sinacantan.	Jupiltepeque.	Jutiapa.
Tree,	jutube,	Utis,	utu'.
Ceiba,	pa'guac,
Banana,	jugua,
Jaguar,	uijlay,	uilay,	guilai.
Deer,	tuma,		tubma.
Jabali,	cargua jaxo,
Dog,	pelo,
Snake,	jurumuy,	urunugui,	urunugui.
Fish,	seema,	samu,	giamuc.
God,	tiuix,
Soul,	terouala,	namasamac,
Alive,	ixiuao,	ixij,	isig.
Dead,	teroa'ar,	tero',	tero'.
Old,	mere,	mochi,	mochi.
White,	mooti',	moatij,	mougua.
Black,	zumati,	simatij,	sijmatig.
Red,	tenati,	tenajtij,	tenajtig.
Yellow,	meelati',	totojtij,
Green,	mee,	meyatij,	meyatij.
Blue,	mee,	,
Bright	ininabar
J-* 1 I ^ I A U , Dark,	zama,	. ___
Above,	xam,
Below	xama'
Yes,	jaa,
No,	xim,
Good-day,			cshi mani :
			Dios.
Good-night,			cshi manu!
			adios.
Good-bye,			coo-par.

NUMERALS.

\. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

ica, ti,

uala, jiria,

P^j,

tacal,

pujua'

uxtu', pakil,

ical,	ical.
piar,	pia'r.
ualar,	guarar.
iriar,	iriar.
pijar,	pujar.
	tacalar.
puljar, .	pulluar.
apuj,	apocar.
	gerjsar.
	paquilar.

6

COMMENTS ON THE VOCABULARY.

Man. Jumu. In the Xicaque language of Honduras jome = man, but as this is the only close similarity in a comparison of thirty seven words, I attribute it to accident ; jurac has a faint resemblance to Cakchiquel hun uinak, one man.

Father, tataj, is evidently the universal baby word for father, and its analogies are worthless for tracing affinities. The same is true of utaj, mother. Compare Germ. Vater, Mutter, Cakchiquel iata.

Son. najuum, in Pokomchi akun, probably an accidental resemblance.

Daughter, jaya najuun, jaya evidently from aya, woman, female, hence "female child," the combination showing that najuun does not mean son, but child, offspring.

Brother, xuyam and keruke are evidently wholly different words, and are either used by the different sexes, or apply the one to an elder the other to a younger brother.

Hair, mux jumatan (the last word no doubt an error for jamatan, liter- ally "the fingers of the head" or more properly " the extremities, the small branches of the head"). See Fingers, musal is apparently a synthesis of mux, and gesalia, with the same signification. Such compounds indicate that the Xinca is more synthetic than the Maya dialects.

Nose, narin, narica, may be the Spanish nariz, nose.

Teeth. The words xa'jan and sajac, mean mouth. The prefix j<m seems to mean either bone, or front part, as it re-occurs in jaricomon, knee (knee-cap ?).

Breast, tutu may be Spanish teta, but in the Maya dialects we find Cak- chiquel and Quiche tu, tit, mamma. Pocoman, tuj, Choi., txu; ziquim may be related to Quiche tz'um, mamma.

Hand, jixipum, probably "the end of the arm." In none of the Maya dialects is there any separate word for "hand." The hand and arm are included in one term, the proper translation of which is "the upper extremity." When it is desired to distinguish between hand and arm, a compound must be formed, or the distinction be left to the hearer. Jixi is also given for stone ; perhaps the stone point or end of the arrow explains the identity of the expressions.

Fingers. On mux, see teeth, pere pu, from pum, upper extremity, and a prefix probably signifying ends, tips, or branches.

Leg. uapi, means foot, q. v.

Knee. See teeth. The two words given evidently mean different things.

Foot, uapan. Comp. Cakchiquel akan.

Town. macMname. This is plainly the Pipil chinamitl, town, with a prefix ma.

Mortar. Span, piedra de* moler, the hollowed stone on which the women pound the corn.

Plate, in the original, comal, from Nahuatl comalli, a shallow earthen dish used to prepare tortillas.

Maize. The word aima given for maize and ear of maize is found in pre- cisely the same form in Chontal, and in Lenca ama. I am inclined to derive it from ixim (pronounce ishim) the universal word for maize in the Maya family. Later, we have for corn field uaya'a, which is close to the Cakchiquel auan, corn-field, or auex, when the corn is young. If this is correct, it would indicate that the neighboring tribes learned the cultivation of corn from the Maya stock, which is the more signifi- cant as it is now the opinion of botanists that the native habitat of the Zea mais was in Guatemala where it was developed artificially from the wild Euchlcena luxurians. The other word given for maize, ahua, is identical with that for "moon." This may possibly refer to an identification of the moon as the goddess of maize. In Chipe- way the name of maize is mandamin, "the grain, min, of the god, manito."

Beans, xin'ac is the Cakchiquel, tzinak, Tzendal txenek. Evidently the Xincas got their corn and beans first from their neighbors of Maya lineage.

Salt, tita, from Nahuatl iztatl. This article the Xincas learned from their Nahuatl speaking neighbors, the Pipiles.

Breeches. All three words are corruptions of the Spanish calzones.

Paper. The words are corruptions of Span, papel.

Heaven or Sky. uina', closely allied to Zotzil uinaje'l.

Sun and Moon . In pure Maya the general root for sun is Jet, for moon, u. But in the Kekchi, Pokomchi and Pokomam we have for moon the totally different word po. This seems to be the radical ofparri, sun, in Xinca. Further, in Chafiabal and Mam we have for moon ixa'u, where the ix is probably the feminine prefix, leaving for moon a'u, a kin to Xiuca ahua. The word ahua bears a superficial resemblance to huy, water, but a

close examination of these tongues does not bear out Dr. Trumbull's

theory, of a radical connection between the expressions for sun and water.

(See Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 1875-6, p. 45.)

Star, xune, allied to Cakchiquel, tzumil, star; hueso appears to have no connection with Maya dialects.

Day. pan, the same as sun.

Night, chijm—ac, Cakchiquel aka, night, perhaps with the preposition chi, at, "by night," "at night."

Wind, yeuha, Pokonchi te'ug.

Tree, utis, Tznedal te, Choi tie'.

Jaguar, uilay, Pokomchi, baijlam.

Deer, tuma, Ckoiital, chima'.

Jabali. cargua, from caragua, woods, jaxo, Pokomchi, aj'k, hog, wild hog ; compare the name of the same animal in Pokomchi, quiche ajk, wood-hog.

Dog. pelo, Spanish, perro.

Soul, terouala, in which tero is the adjective "dead."

8

Alive, ixij, Aguacateca, itzin, Tzendal, c'uxul. Old. mochi, Maya, noixib, Tzotzil mo'ol.

Colors. The names of all the colors differ totally from the Maya. They appear to have a generic suffix, ati, appended to the radicals

mo, white. ten, red.

sim, black. tot, yellow.

me, blue or green.

The word meelati for yellow is probably a mistake, and the identifica- tion of blue and green is common in the radicals of most Central Amer- ican tongues as I have elsewhere pointed out (The Names of the Gods in the Kiche Myths, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., 1881).

For comparison I add the Maya radicals for colors, as presented in the Kiche dialect.

zak, white. cak, red.

gek, black. gan, yellow.

rax, blue or green.

It is evident that there is not the slightest relationship, and they are equally remote from the Pipil and Aztec color names. Numerals. The numerals indicate few and faint similarities to any of the other Central American or Southern Mexican languages with which I have compared them ; ica, one, is like Mangue tica, and the four first may be compared with the Lenca of Honduras as follows :

XINCA, LENCA

1. ica, ita.

2. piar, pe.

3. uala, lagua,

4. jiria, aria.

But I regard this as accidental, as it is not borne out by the re- mainder of the Lenca vocabulary, in four dialects, which I have brought into comparison.

The termination ar in the Jalapa dialect reminds one of the suffix uual, indicating turn or repetition, found in the Ixil numerals, a rather pure Maya 4ialect, thus :

ungvual, one time,

cavual, two times,

ox uai, three times, etc.

God. Unix. Gavarrete appends the note to this word: "It does not properly signify Gfod, but image or idol. At present it is applied to the images of the saints." It is probably from the Cakchiquel tioh, great, divine, a word employed in a religious sense. This indicates the origin of their ancient cult.

The number five, puj-ar, is clearly tl^e noun puj, hand, and refers to the five fingers.

Six, tacal, appears to be a compound of ti-ical, = second, first, i. e. the first finger of the second hand. In seven, puj-ua, and eight, a-puj, the vfordpuj, hand, is apparently present.

From this analysis I reach the conclusion that the Xincas belonged to a different linguistic stock from the Mayas or the Pipiles (Nahuas). They were a rude tribe, who first learned the planting of corn and beans from the Cakchiquels or Pocomams, some parts of their religious rites from the same, the use of salt, and some of their village organization from the Pipiles, and portions of their present dress from the Spaniards.

They spoke a vocalic language of monosyllabic radicals, whose themes are chiefly formed by suffixes.

It may be that they were the rude primitive folk who once extended over Guatemala and were forced down to the coast and into the restricted limits where they were first found, by the warlike immigration of the Maya and Nahua races, both of whom distinctly remembered a foreign origin.

We know little of the date of the advent of the Cakchiquels and Poco- mams into Guatemala. But a traditional history of it is preserved in the "Annals of the Cakchiquels," written shortly after the Conquest by Fran- cisco Ernantez Arana Xahila, the original MS. of which is in my pos- session. He informs us that when his ancestors entered Guatemala large tracts of it were uninhabited, and other portions were peopled by a race who, even to the Cakchiquels, appeared as barbarous, and so rude that they called them chicop, brutes. They had captured two of these, and learned some words when they entered the lower country. The annalist proceeds :

"They [i.e. the ancestors of the Cakchiquels] descended finally to Cholumag and Zuchitan. The language there was very difficult, and only the barbarians themselves could speak that language. We spoke only as we had asked the barbarians Loxpin and Chupichin [their captives], and we said on arriving, 'uaya, uaya, ela opa.' The barbarians were greatly astonished to hear us speak their language with the natives of Cholumag ; they were really frightened at it ; but they gave us only good words."

From these few words, the meaning of which I do not know, it is evi- dent the language was of a totally different stock from Maya or Nahuatl. It was soft and vocalic, like the Xinca ; and, indeed, ela, tongue (lan- guage *!), is found in the vocabulary. Unfortunately, Xahila does not tell us the signification of the phrase he gives. It was probably some form of friendly salutation.

But it is not worth while to pursue the inquiry further. These sugges- tions will indicate the interest which attaches to the Xinca tongue and will I hope, inspire some one to obtain more complete information about it.