COLUMBIA LIBRARIES OFFSITE hi },.! M." £<.( N SrAN[)AH() RK2fin I ^X64069826 H^80 .L52 The origin and forma RECAP Columbia Uiubers;itpCLoV^ in tfje €ity of J^eto Hork g>tfjooI of Cental atrti ©ral gmrgerp \ Reference Htfcrarp Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Columbia University Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/originformationoOOIegr THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION DENTAL FOLLICLE. TIIK FIRST MEMOIR ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEETH. DRS. III. LKGROS AND E. MAGITOT. A TRANSLATION FROM THE FRENCH, WITH INTRO- DUCTION AND NOTES, By M. S. DEAN. Authorized and REVIEWED r.v Dr. Magitot. the Surviving Author. Including all the Illustrations of tue French Work, with a number op Additional Illustrations, Selected and Obiginax I'll [C LGO: JANSKN. McCLURG LND COMPANI 1880. L SV- ^ — obu * Copyright, 1879, By M. S. DEAN. "KNI3HT~t'.~LESNARD I TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE. AN apology will reasonably be expected for pre- -Ol. seuting this translation to the profession. It will require but few words, and I cheerfully offer it. The deficiency and inaccuracy of the litera- ture, in our own language, on the origin and de- velopment of the "tooth-germ" and its associate parts, render it almost worthless, as compared with the more recent researches of foreign investigators. The only exception I would make is that of the valuable work of Professor Tomes. If anything more is required, I refer the reader to the follow- ing pages, which, so far as I have been able to do justice to the authors, will be their own apology. Some of you will remember that, nearly twenty years ago, one of the authors of this memoir, Dr. Magitot, in connection with Dr. Ch. Robin, wrote a treatise entitled, The Genesis and Development of the Dental Follicle, to the Epoch of the Eruption of the Teeth, a large portion of which was translated for the Dental ( 'osmos. While the writers of that treatise gave a detailed and elaborate account of the development of the jaws and their anatomical constituents, that por- tion devoted to the origin and formation of the dental follicle was in many respects incomplete, and in some particulars erroneous. The improved methods of preparing sections for microscopic examination which have since been adopted, together with the experience gained by many years of study, which one of these authors has since devoted to this and kindred subjects, has enabled him, with the aid of his eminent colaborer, not only to correct the errors of that work, but also to describe these parts more minutely, and with greater exactness than had been hitherto pos- sible. While the present work traverses a portion of the ground gone over by the previous writers, it is, nevertheless, a distinct memoir, rendered more comprehensive, and more complete in detail, by the study of the development of the dental system not only in man, but in many other mammifera. Although the work may not be considered as a " practical treatise," in the ordinary acceptation of the term, yet it contains valuable lessons which may be applied in preventing the disastrous con- sequences of those exanthematous diseases which are so liable to arrest or pervert the nutritive sup- ply to these developing organs, and which often result in the disfigurement, and sometimes in the entire loss, of the teeth. Hence its suggestions should not be confined to the dental surgeon alone, but should be made available by the medical prac- titioner, who, at the present day, retains almost undisputed possession of this sadly neglected field of practice. The illustrations, including copies of all those contained in the original, were executed by Baker TRANS! vrm: - PREF \« I . 0 ,i ' .. of thie city ; and. while all of them, I think. compare favorably with the woodcuts found in similar works. — sonic of them showing the minute detail of the parte during the different stages of development, — are remarkably faithful to nature. How well the work of the translator has been don.- niusi be loft for others to decide. It may be proper to state, however, that it lias hem submitted to Dr. Magitot, and meets with his unqualified ap- proval.* The conversational style in which many of the notes have been introduced, may be regarded by some as unsuited to the character <>( a severely scientific work. However this may he, it certainly affords the translator opportunities of presenting, in an easy and familiar manner, the views of dif- ferent authors, and some other valuable matter, which he believes could not otherwise he intro- duced without apparent abruptness. He believes, also, that the plan here adopted will relieve the monotonous strain upon the less scientific reader. and that the facts thus brought out will be more vividly impressed upon most minds than if pre- sented in the ordinary way. If this be so, no other defense is necessary. The adjectival terms denoting the species of embryos — as equine, bovine, etc.. and correspond- ing to that of human — which have been adopted * Extract from his letter. Paris, Sept. 8, L879: "Jt trouvt eette traduction parfaite, et je reconnais <\>t> voire "Trans- lator's Introduction' est tris ingenteust i»>">- preparer i< r i' V intelligence t' juncture they extend, one <>n either side, to the frame of the tympanum, where they terminate in the malleus. | Pig. s. b.) Fig. 8. Fig. 8.— Cranium of a human foetus of four months, natural size. Dissected for the purpose of show- ing the membrane of the tympanum at this age, with the cartilages of the in- cus and of the mal- leus (b); also, the extra-tympanic por- tion of Meckel's car- tilage [a i. [Magitot (nid Rubin). This cartilage is said to constitute the first solid structure that appears in this visceral arch ; and from its commencement (about the twenty- fifth day), until it entirely disappears,* it under- goes a constant series of modifications. * Although Meckel. Valentin, and sonic others, extend the existence of this cartilage to the eighth month in the 34 translator's introduction. It has scarcely attained its full growth (which period corresponds to the commencement of the ossification of the malleus),* when it begins to waste away and disappear. Between the thirty-fifth and the fortieth days of embryonal life, slight traces of ossification show themselves at points nearly equidistant between the symphysis and the angle of the future jaw. This extends rapidly, both anteriorly and pos- teriorly, along the external face of Meckel's carti- lage, in immediate contact but not uniting with it ; and at about the sixtieth day of gestation a miniature jaw-bone is formed, though not yet perfected. (See figure below.) » Pig. 9. Yig. 9. — Taken from a human embryo of ^JSSgZ^g about sixty days. Natural size. Soft parts " removed, showing Meckel's cartilage and the inner, or lingual face of the jaw-bone, left side. The cartilage has much the appearance of a very large hog-bristle. The main object in presenting this figure is to show the stage of development at this early period, i, Symphysis; a, extra- tympanic portion of Meckel's cartilage; n, manubrium mal- lei. (Original figure.) human foetus, yet Drs. Magitot and Eobin state that they have never been able to find a trace of it later than the sixth month. As for myself, I have never succeeded in finding the slightest vestige of it, even at the symphysis, at the end of the fifth month. * The latter part of the third month of embryonal life. MKCkhl. S ('AIM II. \i;| .. 35 At tin's epoch the skeleton of the lower jaw is composed of tw<> arches (if we may include Meckel's cartilage in the term skeleton), — an arch within an arch, an internal cartilaginous and an external osseous one. (Figs. 9 and l" represent one of its bi-sections.) Fl«- 10- I i... 10. - Internal face of the right in- ferior maxilla of a hu- man embryo of about three months, showing the natural size and the relative position of Meckel's cartilage : as also the dental follicles, from which the internal face of the bone is lifted off: a. the extra-tympanic portion, often flexible beyond the ori- fice of the dental canal; h. the symphysis of the cartilage; n, the manubrium mallei (or handle of the hammer), with a little fibrous prolongation ; c, the cartilage of the incus (or anvil). This figure represents the internal surface of Meckel's cartilage, or the interior of the arch. (Magitot and Robin). In an anatomical view this cartilage consists of two parts — a transitory maxillary, or ex- tra-tympanic, and a persistent auricular part. The former, after it is no longer needed to bus- ■ tain the jaw, begins to waste away : while the latter, which represents the malleus, gradually becomes ossified. 36 TRANSLATOR 8 INTRODUCTION. Fig. 11. Fig. 11. — Meck- el's cartilage, from a human embryo of forty to forty-two days, and before the appearance of the maxillary bone; magnified twenty- five diameters. af Enlargement of the. cartilage near its union with the neck of the malleus ; br a slightly enlarged portion of the car- tilage in the form of a spatula, but con- tracted at the me- dian line, where it unites with that of the opposite side ; m, head of the mal- leus ; n, handle of the malleus; e, car- tilage of the incus; o, cartilage of the os lenticulare ; I, cartilage of the stapes. [The outline of a jaw has been added to this figure to show the relative position it will oc- cupy when ossifica- tion takes place.] (Magitot and Robin. )■ \n:< kel's cartilage. 37 This (tssiiicitinii ut" the auricular, and absorp- tion of the transitory, portions commence al the end of the third month of intra-uterine life; the former with the malleus, the latter at points corresponding with the middle portion of each jaw. whence atrophy extends in both directions; and, toward the latter part of the sixth month. according to these authors, the cartilage, from the simphysis to the malleus, entirely disappears, leaving for a time on the surface of the bone a slight groove to mark the place it occupied. Frank : I infer that Meckel's cartilage belongs exclusively to the lower jaw of the human foetus. Teacher: It is by no means the exclusive heritage of man. All the different species of mammals, reptiles, fishes, and even birds, in em- bryonal life possess this transitory, cartilaginous support to the lower jaw. But it does not in all these disappear (as it does in main before birth. In the rodents, — rats and mice, for ex- ample,— it remains without sensible change till birth, or a little later. This brief description, aided by these excel- lent cuts, will, I hope, give you a sufficiently accurate idea of this cartilage to satisfy you for the present. But if you desire further infor- 38 translator's introduction. mation. I must refer you to the thoroughly exhaustive treatise already alluded to ; * for I know of no comparatively complete work upon this subject in the English language. § III.— INTER-MAXILLARY BONES. Casper : There is another obscure point that I would like to have cleared up before it escapes my mind. In your remarks you have referred to the origin of the " mfer-maxillary bones." I was not aware that any such exist in the human skeleton. Our medical and dental text-books say: "The maxillary bones are two in number, united on the median line of the face." If this be so, where can we locate the inter- ■ maxillae ? Teacher : The reason why your text-books do not describe these bones is, probably, because the authors recognize their .existence only in early foetal life, and hence do not deem it neces- sary. But naturalists consider them very im- portant features in zoological science, since the point where they unite with the maxillae forms * See Memoire sur un Organe Transitoire de la Vie Fcetale, de"signe sous le nora de Cartilage de Meckel. (E. Magitot et Ch. Robin. Paris, 1862.) INTKKMAXILLAKY I '.ONES. 39 the dividing line between the incisor and canine teeth. It seems to me that an intimate knowl- edge of these parte is essential to a thorough education in general medicine, and especially in the department of dental surgery. In foetal life the upper jaw is composed of four bones, viz., two maxillary and two inter- maxillary. In each of the latter will be devel- oped and supported two incisors — a central and a lateral; in each of the former, one cuspid and all the teeth posterior to it. Although the intermaxilhe are distinct bones in the human fetus, their external surface is soon covered over with a process from each max- illa, which extends toward the median line, and becomes intimately fused with the former before birth; so that the intermaxillary suture cannot be seen on the outer side ; but on the palatal aspect of these bones the suture can always be recognized at birth, and can often be traced even in adult life. (Flowers, Linnaeus Martin.) In many animals these remain permanently as separate bones; and in human subjects, where the jaw is malformed, detached pieces are often found in this situation, probably owing to their arrested development. (Gray.) 40 TRANSLATOR S INTRODUCTION. By Huxley, and many other authors, these bones are called the premaxillce • these parts are also known as the incisive region, from the fact that the incisor teeth are implanted in these bones.* Fig. 11. Fig. 11. — From a foetus of about four months; showing the palatal aspect of the inter-max- illary bones, and indicating the points that will be occupied by the teeth when developed; also the inter-maxillary suture sep- arating the canine and incisor teeth. * Perhaps it is due to the reader that I here state that the existence of these bones in the human skeleton is not an altogether uncontroverted question. I had prepared a somewhat extended article, giving a sketch of the treat- ment this subject has received from the pens of many anatomists and naturalists, from the days of G-alen to the present. But on reflection I have concluded to suppress it, together with much other collateral matter, lest the work should be so much cumbered thereby as to render it tiresome or confusing to the student. The fact, however, stands unshaken, (as stated by Prof. Paul Gervais, in his work on the human skeleton, Paris, 1856,) that Vicq- d'Azyr and Goethe have shown that these bones exist in the human species, as well as im all the other mammalia. The thought that Goethe, the great poet and naturalist, has made these little bones the object of special scientific DEFINITION OF TERMS. 41 § IV.— DEFINITION OF THE TERMS FCETUS, EM BRYO, FOLLICLE AM' BOURGEON. Frank: I notice thai sometimes yon employ the term embryo and sometimes fcetw. I sup- pose they have the same meaning? Teacher: Magitot, Kolliker, LegroB, Frey, Gray, and many other reputable authors, use these terms indiscriminately, as words of the same signification. On the other hand, Dungli- son, Palmer, Carpenter, Flint, and others, employ the term embryo to designate the rudimental be- in-- during the first four months of intrauterine life, after which they style it the foetus. Some again (including some of the last-named au- thors) divide the period of gestation into three stages. In the first the germ is called an ovum.; when this begins to assume the appearance of study may, in the minds of some, lend a charm to this subject that it would not otherwise possess. It cannot he doubted, I think, that these bones originate from separate points of ossification; but they certainly, a* a rule, become fused with the maxillary bones, on the external surface, at a very early period of fietal life, some- times before the fifth month; while on the palatal aspect the suture is often distinct, extending across the external alveolar process after birth. 4 42 translator's introduction. a body, it is termed an embryo / and about the end of the fourth month (the time corresponding to the period of " quickening ") it is accorded the name of foetus, which designation it retains until birth. This application of the two latter terms to different periods of gestation is entirely arbi- trary, and in some respects objectionable; but I shall generally adopt it, since it possesses some advantages. But sometimes it will be almost unavoidable to speak of embryonal or foetal life, as equivalent to intrauterine life. Frank: While you are defining terms I would like to know just what our authors mean by "dental follicle." Teacher : The dental follicle includes the following parts: the dentine-bulb (papilla), the enamel-organ, and the sac that envelops them which is' called the follicular wall. These three parts constitute the dental follicle. The word follicle is not used here in its primary signification — a little bag or sac — but as a sac and its contents. Kolliker employs an equivalent expression, dental sacculus, in the same sense. This word follicle is also simi- larly employed by many other anatomists, — as DEFINITION <»F TERMS. 4-'i "Graafian follicle," "Malpighian follicle," etc. Tomes, and English and American writer.- gen- erally, ose tin' terms follicle, Bac, and capsnle, as words of the same meaning. It is unfortunate that BOme definite and universal term is not em- ployed to designate these associated parts of the developing tooth ; but for want of such, I shall retain the term follicle in the sense that it is used by the authors of this work. (Fig. 12 very well represents a dental follicle.) Fig. 12. — This cut is taken from the fifth edition of Kolliker's HistoVy. Though the enamel and dentine are al- ready pretty well developed, the mass represented by the figure is still a den- tal follicle. It is from a feline em- bryo magnified fourteen diameters. a, Dentine-bulb; e, enamel -organ ; //, follicular wall. 44 translator's introduction. Frank : Now, one question more. You used the term " bourgeon " several times during your description of the development of the jaws. It is not a familiar word to me, though I suppose it means about the same as process. Teacher : The word means bud. germ, shoot, or sprout; and the primitive outgrowths are called bourgeons, apophyses, processes, etc. It is a French word, but has become Anglicized, and may be found in your English dictionary. This term is often employed in the text as sig- nifying enamel-germ, or enamel-bud. When the buddings take place which develop into enamel- organs, these offshoots or buds are denominated bourgeons of the enamel-organ, or simply bour- geons. I cannot close these introductory remarks without a word of apology for the term "cell," which has been used so freely in the foregoing pages. Now although this, or its equivalent, zellen, cellule, or cella, has been almost univer- sally adopted by anatomists, the word, as applied by them, is manifestly a misnomer. And yet its primitive signification, as first used by Schleiden, has been so modified from time to time, to cor- respond with our clearer conception of the mor- i»i;i IM i ion OF TERMS. 45 phology and nature of the little mass of matter 1 1 1 1 1 > designated, that it will require greal philo- logical research to discover a substitute which will be as definite and comprehensive as this term, thus modified, has now become. Never- theless, it is a stumbling-block to the student, and is an example of the many defects in our terminology, that a tew scientists, prominent among whom I may name Dr. Atkinson, of New- York, are making praiseworthy efforts to remedy. With a few preliminary remarks from our authors, we shall now he introduced into our main, and most interesting, field of study. THE AUTHORS' INTRODUCTION. TIIK work we publish to-day comprises the first part of a series of studies, which em- brace the entire phenomena of the evolution of the dental system of mammals. This subject, which, as you are aware, is one of the most difficult that we have to en- counter in embryology, and which is still in- volved in very great obscurity, has been made bv us the field of extensive investigations, both on the human embryo and on those of the domestic animals. By these studies we have been convinced that the phenomena presented in the series of raamraifera have (except in a few minor differences) a perfect similarity in their general physiological facts; the develop- ment of the follicle, the anatomical composition of its parr-, ami the role which these perform in the functions of the dental organism, are in all respects similar. Our researches in this direction have been stimulated not solely by the state of uncertainty and of controversy in which this question is 48 THE AUTHOKS' INTRODUCTION. involved, but also by the perusal of several im- portant works published of late years in Ger- many by different anatomists, — Kolliker, Wal- deyer, Hertz, Kollmann and others. The results presented by these observers have gained, for certain parts of the question, consid- erable importance. They have determined some new elements that are a legitimate acquisition to science; while other conclusions which tend to invalidate certain doctrines advanced by sev- eral English and French authors, lack, as we shall endeavor to show, sufficient precision and exactness. Besides, there are several questions which remain without any solution whatever. It is with the hope of throwing light upon this problem, that we have undertaken this series of researches. Following rigorously the physiological order, we have been led to consider successively : 1. The mode of origin and formation of the dental follicle. 2. The morphology and struct- ure of that follicle at the period of its complete development. 3. The evolution of the tooth within the follicle. The present memoir will be devoted to the consideration of the [two] first of these questions. THE OliUJIX AND FOLIATION DENTAL FOLLICLE CHAPTER I. THE CONDITION OF TIIK JAWS OP THE EMBBYO AT THE PERIOD OF THE (JENESIS OK THE FOLLICLE. THE EPITHELIAL RIDGE i BOVRRELET). T IIIOUGII we do not intend to dwell -1- long upon the general constitution of tlif jaws at the time of the genesis of the follicle,"" still we think we ought to lay special stress upon certain points which are directly connected with our subject. A- regards the lower jaw, it is known that at a certain epoch in embryonal lite, varying according to the species of animals, the maxillan arch, absolutely destitute of * See Memoir on the Genesis and Development of the Dental Follicles, by Ch. Robin ami E. Magitot; in the physio- logical journal of Brown-S6quard, 1800. 50 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION the least trace of osseous tissue, incloses within its component elements a symmetri- cal cartilaginous band ; and that this, unit- ing with its fellow at the median line, or the future symphysis, extends not only the whole length of the maxillary arch, but even to the frame of the tympanum. This is Meckel? s Cartilage, — an organ which plays only a transitory part in the development of the maxilla, and occupies the interior part of the arch. Thus embed- ded within the embryonic tissue, it repre- sents, at this epoch of intrauterine life, the only fundamental elements of the jaw. (Figs. 8, 9 and 10, pp. 33-4-5.) As to the upper jaw, the period of evo- lution corresponding with that which we have just described in the lower, is that at which the maxillary bourgeons have united with the median or intermaxillary bour- geon.* This phenomenon takes place in * [These authors speak of the two maxillary bourgeons as uniting with the median or intermaxillary bourgeon. From this it would be inferred that there was but one intermaxil- oi THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 51 the human embryo about the fortieth or forty-fifth day. The two maxillary arches being thus formed, we soon obsen e thai in the rounded part (which will afterward constitute the alveolar border), there is produced a bed of epithelial cells forming a protuberance or smooth ridge (saUlii ou bowrrelet), and without any fold or depression whatever. This ridge, visible to the naked eye, is still more manifest in a section cut perpendicu- lar with the axis of the maxillary arch, and is composed of a thick bed of cells. It will he noticed that on its sides an epithelial coat is formed of only a few rows (rangees) of these cells, superposed upon each other; and sometimes, even of a single row. The epithelial ridge is thus added to the embryonal elements before fchej include any lury bourgeon. They use the singular number here, prob- ably because these bourgeons have already formed a union at their external margins, which connection takes place a little before their union with the maxillary bourgeons.— See Robin ami Rfagitot, loc cit.. p. 9. — Tr.] 52 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION other well defined tissues, unless it "be some vessels, nerves, and muscle-fibres, in process of evolution. This epithelial ridge has some peculiari- ties which are of sufficient importance to demand our special attention, and which one would not suspect from simply examin- ing its buccal or exterior surface. In a vertical section you will notice the smooth and rounded ridge that it presents in the mouth, and which justifies the name we give it — maxillary rampart (Kieferwall of Kolliker, Waldeyer and Kollmann). Fig. 13. Fig. 13. — From Thiersch's prepa- ration of an embryonic pig (copied from Frey). d, A mass of epithe- lium — the ' ' dental ridge, " " max- illary rampart " or " Kieferwall (represented by the same letter in the preceding and following cuts); b, younger layer of epithelium; c, the deepest layer — the prismatic or columnar stratum; e, enamel-germ. Beneath this external ridge a projection sinks into the subjacent elements, the out- lines of which represent nearly the form e-^m OF THE DENTAL FOLLK i.i . 53 of the letter I . wit 1 1 the apex slightly in- clined toward the inner side | Fig. 14, d, <1 ). PlO. II. -il?t *••■»*:;"," Fig. 14. — A perpendicular section taken from the inci- sive region of the lower jaw of an ovine embryo (lamb), forty-two millim. in length (magnified eighty diameters.) d, '/. Kpithelial band Q>ourrelet)\ <<, ". transverse section of Meckel's cartilage near the symphysis: c, c, depression of the mucous membrane; c, section of the tongue. (See same letters Fig. 7, p. 30.) Casper: I cannot see the appropriateness of the term "epithelial ridge" which is used so often. In tin1 plate it looks more like a groove than a ridge. Teacher: This term does not, to my mind, express definitely the thick epithelial bed, which, though it presents on the external surface of the 54 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION jaw an eminence or ridge, yet sinks into the substance of the jaw to a greater depth than it rises above the general surface. The word used by the authors is bourrelet, which means a rounded pad, or cushion. This structure was for a long time supposed to be cartilaginous in its nature, and hence called cartilago dentalis, until Raschkow discovered its epithelial charac- ter. M. Guillot (1859) named it the odontogenic part, or the generating part of the teeth ; our authors speak of it frequently as an epithelial band, and we will hereafter so denominate it. In a vertical transverse section this band is represented, as has been stated, by the letter V, with the apex bent a little inward. Now fill this with epithelial cells, and heap them up, and you have a tolerably accurate idea of the epithelial bourrelet or band. In other words, make a groove the entire length of the jaw, shaped* as just described, and fill it " heaping full " of this cel- lular mass, and it also will represent the epithelial band, as seen in fig. 15. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. f>5 Thus constituted, the hourrelei forms, in reality, ;i continuous epithelial band, Dearly vertical, the whole Length of the alveolar border. It always exists in the embryos of man and the higher mammalia, and is even found on some parts which will remain devoid of teeth, as in the bar of the solipeds. Frank: "The bar of the solipeds" is too much for me; soliped, single foot. I did not know there were any one-footed animals! Caspki; : I know that the name soliped is applied to the races of animals that have a single hoof — as the horse and ass — but I am stuck on the "bar." Teacher: In animals, that interval between the "tusks" and the molars, which is destitute of teeth, is technically called the bar; and though the band extends along this portion of the jaw, it is unproductive, and becomes atro- phied and absorbed, as we shall see further on. The more elegant term Hiasti'ina is quite com- monly employed to denote this vacant space be- tween the teeth of the soliped, as well as those that may occur in the jaws of other animals. 56 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION I will give you the substance of a very inter- esting foot-note from the pen of Dr. Pietkiewicz (a former pupil in the laboratory of Prof. Robin) on the Rudimentary Dental Organs of the Rumi- nants. It has been inserted here with the in- dorsement of the authors of this work ; but owing to its great length 1 shall give only a brief summary of its contents, as published in the "Transactions of the American Dental Asso- ciation,".1878 : You are aware that there is a wide-spread belief, which had its origin in the announcement of Goodsir, in 1839, that rudimentary incisor teeth may be found in the em- bryonal jaws of Ruminants. This statement, founded upon certain anatomical appearances, was seized upon by Darwin, Hseckel, and other scientists, to sustain their views regard- ing- the changes that had taken place in the successive generations of animal beings; and thus the theory received additional credit and a fresh impulse, until it has now become the prevailing belief, that the upper jaws of the fcetus of ruminants contain germs of teeth; which, however, disappear before, or soon after, the birth of the animal. This conclusion of Goodsir, which was never carefully verified, has recently been severely shaken, if not entirely overthrown, by the researches of Dr. Pietkiewicz. He says, that in attempting to verify the statement of Goodsir, which had obtained such extensive circulation and credit, he made experiments upon a series of embryos of cattle and sheep, taken in large numbers, from the of l III DENTAL FOLLICLE. 57 earliest period of intrauterine life until they bad attained thirty centimeters, or one foot, in length. In this series of investigations, be ooi only never witnessed the presence of a dental germ, but never found even a trace of the epithelial lamina. He further states, however, thai in the commencement of his work he was led into an error by the deceptive ap- pearance of the sections made entirely from the anterior portion of the jaws; for in these he found on each side of the median line an epithelial sac, which extended from the mucous membrane into the depth of the jaw, and which appeared to constitute the commencement of dental germ-. such as Goodsir undoubtedly conceived them to be. No difference was observed between the epithelium of this sac and that of the mucous membrane, of which it appeared to be a depression. The Malpighian layer constituted its outer investment, while in its interior was found paviment- ous epithelium. From this appearance, he thought one could easily conceive how Goodsir might have been led into the belief that he had discovered dental germs. But in continuing to make sections from these jaws in a posterior direction, he found that the little sac assumed the form of a circular canal, and approached the mucous membrane of the nasal fossa-. Around this canal appeared a cartilaginous cornet, and in the upper part was a mass containing vessels. From this he recognized the organ of Jacobson. There was ab- solutely nothing, he says, that could be, even remotely, compared to the germs of the incisor or canine teeth. 5 58 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION The form of the epithelial Land is the same in the different species of animals; and while it presents its broadest aspect on the alveolar ridge, it grows thinner, and at the same time bends a little inward, as it descends into the subjacent tissues ; so that its internal or lingual face presents a con- cavity, and its labial or buccal face a con- vexity. Though the deeper extremity, or apex, of the band is blunt and rounded in the early stage of development, it becomes very sharp at the moment the first trace of the follicle appears. This band is composed of the same histo- logical elements that constitute the epithe- lial coat of the oral mucous membrane, — that is to say, of nucleated cells, rendered polyhedral in form by reciprocal pressure ; and that portion which penetrates the tis- sues of the jaw is bounded by a continuous layer of prismatic cells. The cells that compose the center of the band often OF THB DENTAL loi.LiCLK. (9 l'i... 15. present .-it their borders thai denticulated arrangemenl which has been noticed by authors in the cells of the epi- dermis, and by which the elements interlock with each other. [Cells described in the Intro- duction, as the "imbricated," " prickle," etc., to which list we will add here the explica- tives "thorny" and "heckle." Fig. 15.] fi... jB. As regards the prismatic layer, it «lnes ii»i differ ^s from the stratum Mai- d -■^^ /'/, from which it is directly derived. [Fig. 16, b. From F)'ey.~\ From the preceding considerations it is seen that the epithelial band, which we have jusl described, is simply a prolongation of the epithelial tegumentary layer {couch. ) of the mouth, which, in sinking into the em- bryonic tissues of the jaws, forms for itself, SO to -peak, a groove which it exactly tills. N<>\\. when the embryonal jaw is sub- 60 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION jected to a prolonged maceration, the band may become spontaneously detached, thus leaving an empty groove ; but at no epoch, in embryonal life, can there be found, on the surface of the alveolar border, any de- pression, sinking, or perforation whatever, when these parts are in a normal condition. The well-known theory of the evolution of the teeth advanced by Goodsir in 1837, and afterward adopted by most authors, was founded on a certain mechanism, which consisted in the formation of the follicular sac at the expense of an exterior depression of the oral mucous membrane. The detach- ment of the epithelial bed by maceration may, doubtless, account for this tSror; but nothing exists in the normal state of the jaws to warrant any such conclusion. The theory of Goodsir is, therefore, absolutely without foundation in fact.* * [For a long time Goodsir's theory of the evolution of the teeth was held to be correct, and his verbal and pic- torial representations were copied into our standard text- books on anatomy and physiology, both medical and OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. <>1 dental; and even Kdlliker, up to his fourth edition, bor- rows from that author tin- cuts illustrating this stage of .■volution, (ioodsir " believed that, at an early period of total life, there appears a continuous open groove, run- ning round the whole circumference of the jaws; that from the bottom of this groove there arose isolated and un- covered papillae, corresponding in number to the milk teeth; that these papilla' become covered in by the deepen- ing of the groove and the meeting of its two edges over their tops, whilst at the same time transverse septa were formed, so that the several papillae become enclosed in their own separate follicles." — Tonus' Mux. of Doit. A nut. " This theory of Goodsir was vigorously attacked at a later date in works of the French histologists Guillot, and Magitot and Robin. According to the latter, the tooth - sacs, dental germs, and remaining parts are developed, in the first instance, within the submucous connected tissue (subdermis), quite independent of the epithelium or mu- cosus." — F ni/. Tk.] 62 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION CHAPTER II. THE EPITHELIAL LAMINA, AND THE GENESIS OF THE ENAMEL-ORGAN. "TTTE have seen that the part of the • * epithelial bourrelet, or band, which sinks into the tissue of the jaw, presents two faces — an external convex and an in- ternal concave one; and that it extends the entire length of the alveolar border. Now, as soon as the development of this organ is completed, a thin process shoots out from its internal face, which we shall designate the epithelial lamina. (Figs. 17 and 18, E E.) This lamina is a continuous process, ex- tending the whole length of the epithelial band, from which it emanates about mid- way between its apex and the epithelial layer (sometimes a little nearer the latter) r OF THE DENTAL I OLLIOLE. 63 and appears t<> be a kind of diverticu- lum (or inflexion) of the band itself.. It Fio. 17. Fig. 17. — A'ertical section of the anterior portion of the lower jaw of an ovine embryo measuring 59 millimetres. a. Showing the section of Meckel's Cartilage; d, epithelial band (or bourrelet); c, fold in the mucous membrane; E, epithelial lamina. These letters refer to the same parts in the foregoing and following figures. is somewhat flattened from above down- ward, and it- rounded extremity is slightly bent in the form of a crosier. ( Fig. 18, E. ) The elements of tin* lamina are of the same character as those which compose the band, viz., polygonal cells inclosed 1>\ a con- tinuous layer of prismatic cells. As develop- ment advances, Large polygonal cells make their appearance in the thicker portion of 64 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION the lamina, similar to those found in the band, or external epithelium. These ar- rangements are important to be noticed ; for, as will be seen hereafter, the prismatic Fia. 18. ,===wi,=-sCL ■M Fig. 18. — Transverse section of the left branch of the lower jaw of an ovine embryo (65 millimetres in length), magnified 260 diameters. This and the preceding cut show the arrangement of the elements of the epithelial band, and also the epithelial lamina. d, Epithelium of the mucous membrane, extending nearly vertically into the jaw and constituting the band and the lamina. E, Epithelial lamina, emanating from the band. The band and lamina are surrounded by the embryonal tissue of the jaw. This portion of the engraving is faulty, in that the nuclear elements are lighter than the surround- ing mass, whereas they should appear darker, (il THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 65 elements which form its outer investment arc never found in the debris of the Lamina, nor in those of the epithelial cord which is derived from it. The t ilium l-nrijdu — the firsl trace of the dental follicle — originates from points upon the tree extremity of this lamina. They show themselves, at first, as slight tubercles arranged at intervals along the margin of the lamina, and corresponding, in number and situation, to the teeth that will be developed in the firsl dentition. To these protuberances we give the name of primitive bowrgeon of the follicle (the first follicular budding, or bud). [In a foot-note these authors give their theory of the origin of the supernumerary teeth; but, as Dr. Magitot (the surviving author of this work) has since modified his views in relation to this phenomenon, a mere statement of the theory advanced by them will here be sufficient. Dra. Legros and Magitot maintained that the supernumerary teeth originate either from the epithelial lamina, from supernumerary buddings arising between the normal num- ber; or that they are off-ahoots from the epithelial cord. In the Bra! case the development of these teeth would be precisely Bimilar to that of the deciduous teeth; in the 6Q THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION other, to that of the permanent teeth, with the exception of the first molar. The present views of Dr. Magitot upon this subject (as recorded on pp. 36-7 of his treatise on the Anomalies of the Teeth, 1877,) are in accord with those previously advanced by Kollmann; and are based upon the well-known fact,, that when the epithelial cord or neck, which connects the enamel-organ with the epithelial lamina, becomes severed by the closure of the follicle, the cells, of which the cord is composed, multiply to a greater or less extent at their severed extremities, — sometimes in great abundance. These epithelial proliferations sometimes continue adherent to the remains of the cord, and to the follicle itself, until they are absorbed; and sometimes considerable masses become detached, and, assuming various forms, wander into the depths of the jaws (Fig. 19). These epithelial proliferations,, according to Kollmann and Magitot, may become the- enamel-germs from which the supernumerary teeth ori- ginate. Now, in order that a tooth may be produced, a super- numerary dentine-papilla must be provided for this ad- ventitious enamel-organ. This would result as a natural consequence, if the theory advanced by the translator of this work in a recent Report on Dental Physiology, before the American Dental Association, is correct. (See Trans. r 1878, pp. 56-57). In this paper it was maintained that dentine-papilke may originate from any point of the den- tinal sheet of tissue (as described by Dursy), with which the epithelial mass comes in contact; that it is solely through the influence of the enamel-organ upon this tissue, that the development of a dentine-papilla is induced. If OF THE DENT \\. FOLLICLE. Fig. 19. <;: 'MB®' - a Ma^s«^H Fig. 19.— Taken from a bovine embryo, magnified 100 diametere. Tbia section is taken after the rupture of the epithelial cord, and shows the epithelial proliferations that occur in this region at this period of evolution. The cut represents the territory between the wall of the follicle (o) and the mucous membrane (? FlG. '22. — Taken from a section of the lower jaw of an ovine embryo, measuring 82 millim, in length. (Mag 2G0 diameters.) c, Oral epithelium; /'. epithelial cord and the •" varicosities" referred to in the text: F THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 75 prismatic cells thai form the surrounding layer, whose numbers increase in the same proportion. This epithelial body thus occupying the deeper tissue of the jaw soon assumes a somewhat spherical. form ; the superior pole corresponding with its point of connection with the cord, while the inferior pole points toward the bottom of the jaw, inclining more or less toward the lingual side. This mass represents the enamel-organ as fully developed. Shortly afterward the inferior pole becomes slightly compressed toward the center of the enamel- organ, which results in the formation of a concavity in its lower or deeper extremity; and the mass then assumes a shape re- sembling a hood or cap, but still retaining its connection with the cord. This phenomenon of compression coin- cides with the appearance of a new organ in the jaws, th dentine-bulb [dentine- papilla]. This, in fact, originates ;,t the inferior pole of the enamel-organ, where 76 THE ORIGIN AID FORMATION the compression takes place. It first ap- pears as an opaque point, but it soon assumes a conical form, and its summit produces and occupies the corresponding depression in the enamel-organ. This reciprocal adaptation of the two organs, which takes place from the first appearance of the dental bulb, continues throughout all their subsequent phases; the enamel-organ always covering the bulb, and exactly fitting its contours, whatever may be its form, or the form, number and disposition of the divisions it may present. No connection of tissue, however, exists be- tween the two organs at any stage of de- velopment. Dissections of these parts, their maceration in coagulating liquids, as well as the examination of sections, all establish this fact beyond question. This simple juxta- position of the surfaces of these two organs ceases, however, at the base of the bulb, where the enamel-organ turns back upon itself with a rounded border. (Fig. 22.) OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. <7 It' we now examine the composition "I ill,, enamel-organ, [al the period of develop- in,. ni represented in Fig. 22, saj about the fifteenth week of the human embryo, | we find that the primitive elements (the polyg- onal cells which occupy its centra] portion, and ilif prismatic cortical Layer,) have under* gone notable modifications. We discover, in fact, that the middle region of this organ is occupied by some elements of B,newform^ essentially differing in appearance from that of the original cells. Thes< are stelldU bodies, composed of a central nucleus, sur- Fig. 28. Fig. 28.— Stellate cells of the enamel-organ. (Dia- grammatic, from Frey). Thesi cells are also very well sliuwn in the preceding figure. 78 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION rounded by a transparent or finely granu- lated mass, which ramifies and inosculates with the neighboring elements. (Figs. 22-3.) These star-shaped bodies occupy at first only the center of the enamel-organ; those near the periphery preserving their origi- nal polygonal form, but becoming stellate in proportion as the dimensions of the organ increase. It will be noticed, however, that the anastomosing processes are always much longer and more ramified, as the cells are situated nearer to the central portion ; while in the vicinity of the periphery it is some- what difficult to distinguish these processes, as they are here only rudimentary. The elements thus described are immersed in a translucid amorphous mass, coagulable in acids, and having the consistence and ap- j^earance of the white of an egg. These starred bodies — or " stellate cells," as they are usually termed, — are formed directly at the expense of the polygonal elements composing the internal mass of OF III 1- DENTAL FOLLICLE. 79 the enamel-organ. The process is as fol- lows: The substance mentioned above in- terposes itself Little by little between these originally small polyhedral cells, and thus their walls lose their mutual contact, excepl at certain points where they -till cohere. A.s a dired resuli of this phenomenon, the primitive polygonal cells exhibit a number of depressions extending from their exterior Burface toward the center, giving them their stellate appearance. From this transformation the primitive cells would become entirely insulated by the intervention of this new mucous forma- tion, were it not for these connecting pro- cesses, which give to this organ, a- a whole, it- peculiar reticulated appearance, and t<> each cell its stellate form. It is a remark- able tact that no line of juncture can be discovered where these cells are connected with each other, the various re-agents failing to disclose the leasl trace of it, so effectually have these parts been cemented together. 80 THE ORIGIN" AND FORMATION According to this theory, the stellate ar- rangement of the "pulp" of the eaamel-organ (the intimate composition of which we do not purpose to describe in this memoir) re- sults from a simple modification of the form of the primitive polygonal cells, — a change which they have undergone passively, as it were. These elements of the enamel- organ, notwithstanding their stellate form, must be regarded, therefore, as absolutely epithelial in their nature. The mechanism of this transformation, however, differs ma- terially from that given by Kolliker,* and after him by several other anatomists, who contend that these primitive cells might take this, stellate form spontaneously. Our opinion, however, is in conformity with that of Waldeyer,f who was the first to properly examine and describe this phe- nomenon; though Huxley, % at a much * Human Histology, French trans., 1869, p. 497. f Untersuchungen liber die Entwicklung der Ziihne, Zeitschr. f. rat. rned. 1865. % Quart. Journal of Microscopical Sc, 1854, pp. 55-56. OF Till". DENTAL FOLLICLE: s 1 earlier day, had advanced the idea (h\ po- thetically, it is true,) thai the enamel-organ had an epithelial origin ; but be did not indicate the mode wherebj the transforma- tion of it- elements was effected.* Now as to the pi'ismaHc cells : duringthe * The epithelial nature of the enamel-organ had not till recently been accepted in France; but ita elements were described as stellate Bbro-plastic bodies I Robin and Magitot, loc. cit., p. 60). This conclusion was based, however, solely upon the form that these elements present; and the same argument may be used to controvert this opinion. It is this: that in the enamel -organ the borders of these cells, between the radiated filaments which are drawn out from their periphery, are always concave, while in the stellate fibroblastic bodies these borders present plane or convex surfaces alternating with those that are concave. [The student must not infer from the above that Huxley was the first to advance the idea that the enamel was of epithelial origin; for this opinion was held by physiologist a Long before his day. The discovery accred- ited to Huxley is this: that the. cells, constituting the internal mass of the enamel-organ (the reticular portion Burrounded by the stratum of prismatic cells), are only metamorphosed epithelial cells. Heretofore bistologiBta believed these to be stellate connective-tissue cells: but the peripheral layer was then, as it is dow, admitted to be composed of epithelial cells. Tu.] 82 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION early stage of evolution, we have found them identical in character and in dimen- sions on all parts of the periphery ; but the moment the enamel-organ assumes a new form, produced by the development of the bulb, this stratum undergoes some impor- tant modifications. At this period, in fact, the cells of that portion of the cortical layer, which occivpy the concave face of the enamel- organ, and which consequently lie in con- tact with the dentinal bulb, begin to in- crease in length ; while those constituting the convex surface of this organ sensibly diminish in size. This difference in the di- mensions of the cells occupying the. two segments of the prismatic stratum or corti- cal layer manifests itself more and more during the progress of follicular evolution ; and, as we shall see hereafter, the external layer [" external epithelium of the enamel- organ " disappears long before the com- plete atrophy of the enamel-pulp ; while the other [the "internal epithelium"] still OF III I'. DENTAL FOLLICLE. 83 remains to perform the importanl functions assigned to it. Qamely, tin formation of th i mtnh I. The prismatic cells of the concave face of the enamel-organ [the, enamel-cells, or ameloblasts*] offer some peculiar character- * [The term ameloblast is compounded of Amel (from the French Bmail), enamel; and blast (from the Greek blastos), germ. This compound word has recently been introduced into our nomenclature by Prof. Eames, of St. Louis; and owing to its euphony, its concise and definite expression, and its general relations to the terms osteoblast, odontoblast and others, it ought, as it seems to me, to be adopted by the dental histologist. It will certainly facilitate the descrip- tion of the parts to which it is applied, and obviate the repetition of long descriptive phrases. I shall, therefore, follow the lead of Dr. Black, and whenever it seems best shall substitute this new term for phrases of equivalent meaning that may be found in the original. The amelo- blasts are the enamel-cells. They constitute the prismatic layer of Legros and Magitot; the internal epithelium of Kolliker; and the adamantine membrane of Raschkow; namely, that section of the stratum Malpighii forming the peripheral layer which lines the concave face of the enamel- organ, and lies i» immediate contact with the dentine-bulb. The other section of this stratum covers, or rather constitutes, the convex surface of the enamel-organ, and is generally known as the external epithelium. It has probably been 84 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION istics, to whicli we will now call your at- tention. Originally identical with those of the [lowest layer of the] Malpighian stratum, from which they are directly derived, these cells, besides increasing in length, expe- rience some important changes in form. The extremity that is directed toward the center of the organ, becomes long and slen- der, forming jjrocesses which unite with or are continuous with the filaments that pro- ceed from those neighboring cells which con- stitute the portion of the enamel-organ known as the stratum intermedium* The previously noticed that the peripheral layer has been divided into two sections. This has been done simply for con- venience of description, there being no anatomical division between these two portions ; the cells being alike and con- tiguous, although at a later period they experience those dissimilar modifications that are fully and clearly described in the text. Tr.] ' * [As this portion of the enamel-organ is only inci- dentally mentioned in this work, a few words of explana- tion may not be out of place here. It might with pro- priety be termed the stratum of Hannover since he is its accredited discoverer.. This "stratum intermedium" is not represented in any of these cuts, but it consists of a OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. opposite or peripheral extremity, thai is bo say, the bo8( of these cells, presents the regular prismatic form of a hexagon. (Fig. 24.) It' we n<>\\ examine an underanged [Fig. 24 represents the basal aspect of a layer of amelo- blasts. Tu.] layer oftlic-c prismatic cells, or ameloblasts, magnified about 400 diameters", we shall find that the free margin of this layer (that is to say, the part that corresponds to the few layers of cells that still retain nearly their primitive form, and lies between the layer of ameloblasts and the stellate portion of the "enamel-pulp." Prof. Tomes (in his Man. of Dental Anat., p. 125) describes it thus: "The 'stratum intermedium' consists of cells intermediate in character between those of the bordering epithelium and the stellate reticulum; they are branched, bat less con- spicuously so than the stellate cells, with which on the one hand they are continuous, on the other with the enamel cells." The special functions of these cells is 86 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION base of these cells ) appears clearer than the bodies of the cells themselves, and in fresh preparations seems like a continuous line. If, however, a like examination be made of some hardened preparations, or if careful means be taken to detach this mar- ginal line, which the edge of a section of the plateau represents, from the base of the cells, it will be found that it can be sub- divided into as many sections as there are cells in the layer. And yet some prep- arations may be met with, in which more or less of this clearer line becomes detached in the form of a shred 'of ribbon. It is this strip, which is evidently made continuous questionable. Waldeyer believes that, since "the enamel cells may be frequently seen to be connected at their lower extremities with the cells of the stratum interme- dium, a multiplication of the enamel- cells from the cells of this stratum in the direction of their length may be admitted to occur " (Strieker's Hist., p. 334); an opinion shared by Hertz and the author first quoted, but differing from that of Magitot and Kolliker. A further description of these cells would more properly come under the head of Development of the Enamel. Tr.] OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 87 1>\ artificial means, thai ha- given rise fco the hypothesis fchal a membrane invests or lines the concave face of this stratum of cells, ameloblasts. AW- shall sec, moreover, in examining these peculiarities in detail, thai this appearance is not specially and ex- clusively confined to the cells of i he enamel- organ, since it exists wherever we find the prismatic cells provided with what lias been termed a 'plateau. The prismatic cells of the intestines are known to be thus sup- plied. Now it happens, that, whether this plateau remains adherent to each c CHAPTER III. ORIGIN AND FORMATION OF THE DENTAL BULB. AND OF THE FOLLICULAR WALL. AS we have just seen, the enamel-organ -*--*- sooii loses its spherical form and acquires the appearance of a hood or cap; and this change in form is contemporaneous with the appearance of a new component part of the follicle, — the dentinal bulb. A alight opacity appears on the point of em- bryonic tissue of the jaw, that corresponds to tlif depression in the enamel-organ. This opacity is due to the production of new elements, which are grouped in such a manner as to form at first a Little rounded nipple of hemispheric form, the convexity of which corresponds exactly to the de- 94 THE ORIGIN AJSTD FORMATION pression or concavity of the enamel-organ. (Fig. 26, H.) FIG. 26. Fig. 26. — Vertical section taken from the incisive region of the lower jaw of an ovine embryo, measuring 115 millimeters, magnified 80 diameters, a, Meckel's cartilage; b, osseous formation; c, section of the dental artery; d, epithelial band (bourrelet); E, epithelial lamina; F, cord; g, enamel- organ. Meckel's cartilage at the right of the cut. H represents the incipient dental bulb. The drawing for this cut preserves the defects in the specimen from which it was taken. For example: the space between the enamel- organ and the follicular wall is caused by the shrinkage of the former, — a result of too long maceration of the parts. Similar defects will be found in several of the following cuts. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. '.».> This little papilla, which represents the incipienl dental bulb, is composed a1 firsi only of nucleated embryoplastic elements, and soon afterward of fusiform and Btellate bodies. It will be noticed, also, that at this early stage of development a vascular loop enter- it- substance, similar to those Pound in the papillae of the skin; but we have not been able to discover in it any" nerve-fibres until it has attained a mam- millated form. The l>ull> retains this latter form but a brief period, for it soon shows a tendency to take that of the future tooth: thus, for the incisors and canines, it assumes a conical form; for the molars, in man and the carnivora, the primitive papilla i> soon covered with secondary protuberances, equal in number to tin- cusps of tin future crown : and in the compound molars of the herbiv- ora and rodents throws out prolongations which represent also the future divisions of the crown. An analogous arrangemenl is found in the incisors (d corne£) of the soliped. 96 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION Iii all these circumstances the enamel- organ allows itself, as it were, to be moulded by the bulb, so as to exactly conform to whatever configuration the latter may as- sume. Casper : The dentine-papilla determines, then, the form or contour of the crown of the future tooth ? I inferred from a remark you made (in regard to the supernumerary teeth, I think,) that it was the enamel-organ that controls this matter ; at least, that this was your opinion. Teachee : Whatever views I may entertain as to the influence exerted by the enamel-organ have been mainly derived from these authors, though I have recently given this subject con- siderable thought. This is one of the points in dental physiology that has been almost entirely ignored by authors who have written upon the development of the teeth. Drs. Legros and Magitot, however, express very decided views in regard to it, though they do not state the reasons upon which their opinion is founded. In a more recent work (Traite des Anomalies, etc., Paris, 1877,) Dr. Magitot, the surviving author of the present treatise, maintains, very <>K THE DENTAL 1 OLLH I.K. 97 positively, that the enamel-organ is endowed with this influence. These are his words: •• It is explicitly admitted that the epithelial cord, or enamel-organ, dominates and determines the place and the form of the tooth. The gene- sis and development of the dental bulb (dentine- germ), which makes its appearance subsequently to the cord, is absolutely dependent, as a physio- logical consequence, upon the presence and fo?'m of the enamel-organ itself. One will, neverthe- less, be tempted to believe," he continues, " that the nature of the future tooth is under the control of the dentine-papilla, a kind of organic mould upon which the calcific elements are grouped ; but it must be remembered that the epithelial cord, which represents the future enamel-organ, always precedes the appearance of the dentine- papilla, which never originates till the cord has advanced a certain distance in its course. Accord- ingly, we believe that the epithelial cord decides Dot only the place of genesis, but the form and function of the corresponding tooth." It will be seen from the above quotation that I>r. Magitot dissents from the general opinion in regard to the influence which these parts i namely, the enamel-organ and the dentine-germ) exercise upon each other. AlB for myself, I had supposed that the enamel- 98 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION organ was the more passive structure, and that its form, at least, was determined by the dentine- ' papilla. But, in considering this subject more care- fully, and examining both sides of the question, I discover evidence which strongly confirms the theory of Dr. Magi tot. My conclusions rest mainly upon a certain fact in the statement of Dursy, who, according to Waldeyer, says : " The first germ of dentine appears in the den- tal saculus, as a dark, semi-lunar area at the bot- - torn of the dental groove, — that is to say, of the enamel-germ, — coetaneously and continuously with which it is developed along each half of the jaw. At certain points, corresponding to the position of the subsequent teeth, the young struct- ure develops in the form of papillae, projecting against the enamel-germs, while the remainder atrophies. The two horns of the semi-lunar mass (as seen in section) extend from the base of the dental papilla some distance upward, and em- brace the dentine-germ and enamel-organ." • The particular point in this statement of Dursy to which I allude, and to which I wish to call your special attention, is that referring to the semi- lunar area of tissue extending along each half of the jaw, and from which the dentine-germs are de- veloped. If the anatomical description of Dnrsy OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. '•,'•, is correct (ami lam not aware thai it is disputed), a dentine-germ might be developed from any poinl of this semi-lunar area which should be reached by the enamel-organ. No particular point is assigned to the development of any especial den- tine-germ : that is entirely accidental, and de- pends upon the course which the enamel-organ takes. For example : It" the epithelial cord of a cuspid should deviate from its normal course, so as to come in contact with this dentinal sheet of tissue at a point between the bicuspids, the cuspid would be developed between those two teeth. In fact, whatever point in this tissue the enamel- organ of the cuspid should reach, the future tooth would be a true cuspid. If this be admitted, the theory of Dr. Magitot must be true, — that the enamel-organ determines the form and character of the future tooth. If the fact that the teeth of certain fishes are wholly destitute of -enamel, seems to militate against this theory, we have the statement from high authority that all teeth, whether clothed with enamel or not, are, in the formative stage, universally endowed with enamel-organs. May we not infer, then, that in such cases the rudi- 100 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION mentary enamel-organ has performed its func- tions when it has incited the development of the dentine-germ, and determined ito future form and character?* As the dental bulb develops in height, it takes a slightly oblique direction in re- lation to the axis of the follicle, and at the same time undergoes a certain constriction at its base, thus forming a kind of neck at the line where (as has been already seen) the enamel-organ is reflected back upon itself. (Fig. 27.) There is, however, one .peculiarity in the structure of the bulb which we ought par- ticularly to notice here, and that is the na- ture of the external surface of this organ. If you examine the structure of a vertical section of the bulb, you will find that there exists at the periphery of this organ a thin, clear zone, which is easily distinguished from the subjacent tissue by its refraction. * [Extract from my report on Dental Physiology, read before the American Dental Association, August, 1878. — Tit.] OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1<»1 This zone to which several anatomists have assigned important functions, is only a thin stratum of amorphous material, which is wholly destitute of anatomical elements and of granulations. This amorphous layer is not only more Transparent, but somewhat denser, than the subjacent tissue of the bulb, so that some- times it may be detached from the surface of the latter. This fact has led many anat< >mists to suppose that the bulb was invested with a distinct membrane (the memhrana pivfor- mativa of Raschkow). (Fig. 25, lower parallel line, A A, p. 89.) We shall describe, in another work, the nature and functions of this structureless layer, but we will say this much in advance, that it is in this tissue that the ivory-cells [odontoblasts | make their first appearance. As soon as this little mass of new ele- ments, which constitutes the dental bulb, has taken a hemispheric form, two opaque processes, originating at its base, ascend di- 102 THE OKIGIN AND FORMATION vergently upon its sides; these appear to emanate directly from the tissues of the bulb itself, and they represent the first trace .of the wall [sac] of the future follicle. (Fig 22 I, p. 73.) If, at this period, the constitution of these follicular processes be studied, we find them composed of exactly the same elements as the bulb from which they originate. As the bulb continues to develop, these pro- cesses also increase in length, and bend round toward each other, in such a way as to finally embrace in their double concavity not only the bulb itself but also the enamel- organ, which, as you already know, constant- ly crowns the latter. In this manner the follicular wall, which was at first only a little collar attached to the neck of the bulb, by its gradual upward growth finally em- braces and isolates both the enamel-organ and the dentinal bulb. Caspee : We are told, at first, that the fol- licular wall originates from two processes, on OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 1 >3 opposite sides of the bulb; but now it is de- scribed as a little colla/r fixed to the neck of the bulb — apparently quite another thing. Teacher: These authors, doubtless, at first describe the follicular wall as it appears in sec- tion. In reality it must be a circular process, which, in the diagrammatic figure, presents the appearance of two. Prof. Tomes says, in his Dental Anatomy : "From the base of the den- tine-bulb prolongations pass outward and slight- ly upward, so that they in a measure embrace the free edge of the enamel-organ ; and, at a somewhat later period, they grow upward till they fairly embrace the whole enamel-organ." Owen, in his Odontography, uses the follow- ing language: "By the development of three or four lamellar processes from the opposite sides of the mouth of the follicle, and their mutual cohesion, the papilla is inclosed in a capsule." Prof. "\Vedl, in his Pathology of the Teeth, says: "The dentinal germ proceeds from the floor of the dental sac which invests it and the enamel-organ." K. illiker (fifth edition) says: "The dentine- papilla arises from the bottom of the dental sac." Although the last two authors do not minutely 104 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION describe the process of development, they evi- dently do not mean that the bulb arises from the "bottom" or "floor" of a formed sac, but upon the surface of a sheet of tissue which finally forms the sac. They agree with Tomes and the authors of this work, excepting that the former histologists believe that the base of the dentinal bulb is inclosed within the walls of the sac; whereas the others believe the follicle, from its apex to the base of the bulb, to be invested by the sac. At this period the follicular wall may be compared to a muff inflated in the middle, the lower opening of which corresponds to the base, or neck, of the bulb to which it is attached ; while the opposite opening corre- sponds to the neck of the enamel-organ, that is to say, to the point where the latter is connected with the epithelial cord. Soon afterward the cord becomes severed at this point, by the resorption of its constituent elements; a cessation of continuity due, without doubt, to the compression or stran- gulation it undergoes from the encroaching OF Till'. DENTAL FOLLICLE. LOS walls, which u<>\\ unite a1 this poinl and completely inclose the follicle. Thus fclie enamel-organ Loses the connection which it had hitherto maintained with the epithelial lamina, and the dental follicle may be re- garded as definitely completed. (Fig. 27.) Fie. 87. — 4C Fig. 27. — Section of the lower jaw of a bovine embi^o, magnified 80 diameters; showing the dental follicle, as completed, ami the surrounding tissues. a. Meckel's cartilage; /<. traces of ossification; r. Lowes! 8 106 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION This wall [sac], composed primarily, as we have seen, of embryoplastic elements, gradually assumes the aspect of a distinct laminated membrane, which may be sep- arated from the adjacent tissues, except at the base of the bulb, to which it remains fixed. Kolliker, with most other authors, de- scribes this wall as composed of two con- centric laminge ; and yet admits, with Hux- ley, that the transparent stratum which clothes the bulb (membrana prceformativci) reflects itself back on its internal face, and thus lines the whole inner surface of the follicular wall. We will reserve, for a forthcoming work, the study of these different peculiarities of structure. layer of the Malpighian stratum; d, oral epithelium; F, ameloblastic layer; lower F, external layer of the enamel- organ, — a continuation of the internal layer of ameloblasts; g, stellate recticulum of the enamel-organ; H, dental bulb; I, follicular wall (indistinct); K, buddings of the cord. The vascular appearance of the bulb does not appear in the original. OF i in: D] xi \i. i in. i. n i.i:. 1«>7 I'uwk: With my ideas of the parts constitut- ing the follicle, I fail to comprehend how the pre- formative membrane can line the internal Burface of the follicular wall and also clothe the bulb. Teacher: Perhaps Kolliker's definition of the follicle, assisted by Fig. 2."), may enable you to better understand this matter; and since it is brief, 1 will give you the benefit of it. In his "'tli edition it reads as follows: "The dental sacs [follicles] are composed of three parts, — the sac properly so-catted, the dental germ, and the enamel-organ. The proper dental sac is an envelope consisting of two layers. — an external one composed of dense connective tissue, ami a softer internal one, of a gelatinous consi ence, containing numerous connective-tissue cor- puscles, and also some true fasciculi of connective tissue. This internal layer is limited on its in- ner surface, toward the enamel-organ, by a homo- geneous layer of extreme tenuity, the preform- ative membrane of the dental-germ'" [bulb]. At tin- period of evolution to which we have arrived in our description, the follicle i- completed and closed, tf now we exam- ine it- general constitution, we shall find it 108 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION composed, proceeding from the outside in- ward — 1st. Of the follicular wall which, clothes its entire surface, — except the base of the bulb, which remains free. (Fig. 27, I.) 2d. Of the enamel-organ, subjacent to the follicular wall, to which it conforms in its whole extent, in such a way that while its external face corresponds to this wall, its lower, concave face is in immediate con- tact with the bulb. (Gr.) 3d. Lastly, of the hull itself, which oc- cupies the lower and central portion of the follicular sac. (H.) Except the three fundamental parts just named, no other substance finds place in the constitution of the follicle. The enamel- organ exactly fills all the space compre- hended between the wall [sac] and the bulb, and terminates at the base of the lat- ter in a rounded margin, which forms the dividing line between the prismatic cells that clothe both its concave and convex OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. L09 surfaces | Sec Fig. 25, A A |. This bound- ary, however, is nol artificial. It results, on the one hand, from anatomical differ- ences that these parts now present, and, on the other, from the physiological role which the cells of the concave face are called upon to perforin: whereas the exter- nal layer atrophies rapidly and disappears.* This prismatic layer of the concave surface (adamantine membrane), constituting, as we shall see, the stratum of enamel-cells | amel- oblasts], remains a long time in the compo- sition of the follicle ; not only after the ex- ternal layer has disappeared, but even after the atrophy of the gelatinous part of the * I Waldeyer and Hertz believe this external layer of the enamel- organ, instead of being absorbed, to finally become the cuticula dentis, " Nasniyth's membrane." Tomes, Magi- tot and Wedl, however, attribute this membrane to another source, believing its origin identical to that of the cement; while Huxley maintains that the preformative membrane (see upper line, A A. Pig. 85), after the enamel is completed, constitutes this thin enamel covering. Though Kolliker does not assent to the latter theory, yet he believes this membrane to be a product of the enamel-organ. — Tb. | 110 THE ORIGIN" AND FORMATION enamel-organ. Let us farther add, that in the rodents (whose incisors, as we know, are of continuous growth) this layer of cells [ameloblasts] remains upon a portion of the anterior or convex face of these teeth dur- ing the entire life of the animal. This constitution of the follicle, compre- hending, as it does, these three fundamental parts, seems to be characteristic of that of man, of the carnivora, and in general of all the mammals whose teeth are not supplied with coronal cement. But if the follicle of an embryonal soliped be examined, it will be noticed that for a long time before the formation of the first dentine-cap there ex- ists between the follicular wall and the or- gans within it a new tissue, very distinct from the neighboring parts — in color, in consistence, and in composition. This is the organ upon which will subsequently depend the formation of the cement. We will omit the description of the cemental organ here, but will study it elsewhere in OF THE DENTAL I •'< LLIOLE. 1 1 1 detail; all that we wish to establish at presenl is its incontestable existence in the follicles of Buch teeth as are clothed with corona] cement.* This fact is so decisive that by the simple examination of a follicle we can determine, from the presence or the absence of this organ, whether the future tooth will or will not be furnished with coronal cement. The dental follicle, the component parts of which are all thus grouped and inclosed in one sac, has a general ovoid form. Its * This cemental-organ, which will always be found in the follicles of the molars of herbivorous animals, and in those of the incisors and molars of solipeds, has been described for the first time in France, in a work by E. Magitot, enti- tled " Derelopvment de la Structure des Dents." (These in- augurate, 1858, p. 80). It was presented anew some years ater by Robin et Magitot. (Loc. Cit. 1861, p. 145 et suiv.) Since that time the existence of this organ appears not to have been recognized by any other anatomist. Indeed, in the last works published in Germany, by Kdlliker, Waldeyer, Hertz. Kollmann and others, its existence lias been formally denied. We are greatly surprised to see so evident an anatomical fact thus contested; but it will be easy for us to establish again the reality of this discovery, which we pro- pose doing in our second memoir. 112 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION size varies greatly in the different animal species, and according to the kind of teeth that are to be developed from it. When the follicle is completely formed, it remains inclosed within the embryonal tissues of the jaws, with which at first it is only feebly connected. Thus isolated in the depth of the jaws, having lost its communication with the mucous membrane [epithelium], by the rupture of the cord, it does not yet form any connection with the maxillary bone; for the formation of the alveolar partitions does not take place until a later period. The net- work of vessels which ramify the follicular wall and dental bulb is furnished from different sources, and enters these tissues from the surrounding parts; while the enamel-organ, as we know, is non- vascular. The direction of the follicle, that is to say the great axis of the ovoid, which it represents, is quite variable. Though regularly vertical in man and the carnivora, OF THE DENTAL FOLLK LE. 1 L3 ii takes an oblique direction in the herbiv- orous animals, and this i> more particularly marked in the follicles of the incisors. The latter, in fact, take an oblique and diver- genl course, like the spoke- of a wheel, which is moreover in conformity with the inclination of the alveolar arch. (Fig. 28). A rff.rfi My MP Fig. 28. — Vertical section of anterior portion of the lower jaw of an equine embryo, magnified 80 diameters. a, Meckel's cartilage; b, traces of ossification; d, oral epithelium; g, enamel-organ; //, dental bulb; /, layer of ameloblasts (internal epithelium); K, permanent follicle; L, place assigned for the development of the cement. 114 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION We may add, however, that the axis of the follicle is generally the same as that of the bulb, and that it strictly corre- sponds with that of the alveolar border, for each particular species. As to its position in the jaws, it differs in like manner accord- ing to the species. In man, the carnivora and the solipeds, it is situated quite near the mucous membrane [epidermis], and in these the epithelial cord is consequently quite short; but it is located more deeply, in the bovine and ovine herbivora (cattle and sheep), and the cord consequently ac- quires a proportionate length. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE 1 1 5 CHAPTER IV. PHENOMENA THAT FOLLOW THE FORMATION OF THE FOLLICLE, AND THE RUPTURE of THE EPITHELIAL CORD. AS soon .-is tin* sac is closed, ami rh<- follicle -*--^- becomes isolated by the rupture of the epithelial cord, various phenomena are produced in the embryonal tissues that sur- round this organ, in the region between the summit or apex of the follicle and the epi- thelial layer of the gum. These phenom- ena are principally located in the epithelial lamina and in the cord itself. In fact, as soon as the epithelial lamina loses its connection with the follicle, by the rupture of the cord, the epithelial cells composing it become greatly increased in number at the severed point. This multi- plication of cell-elements results in the format ion of irregular buddings, which 116 THE OEIGIN xVND FORMATION wander in different directions into the deeper portions of the embryonal tissue. These buddings vary greatly in form ; sometimes they are simple cylinders, retain- ing their connection with the primitive lamina by pedicles of various lengths, and sometimes this slight connective is ab- sorbed, thus isolating an epithelial mass. (Fig. 19, F, p. 67.) These masses are formed wholly of large polygonous cells, similar to those found in the center of the epithelial lamina; but they are never, like the latter, surrounded by a layer of prismatic cells. Very fre- quently, however, groups of these elements take the globular form, and are, in every respect, similar to those which are some- times discovered within the epithelial lam- ina itself. (Fig. 29, F.) These different dispositions account for the presence of epithelial masses of such varied form ; which, until now, were unexplained, and' which are found in almost all the sections of the jaws made at this epoch of evolution. OF THE DENTAL I'M. I. KIT. Km;. 29. 117 *2i „ tw$jS r Fig. 29.— This is a section taken from an embryonal calf. (Magnified 260 diameters.) Like fig. 19, it embraces the region external to the follicle (a), which latter is no! shown on the cut; b, epithelial buddings upon the follicular wall; EE, buddings of the epithelial cord; /■'. globular epithelial mass in the lamina; ii, oral epithelium (epidermis); c, epithelial lamina " still intact." 118 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION These phenomena of buddings cease at a certain period, which always seems to be anterior to the time at which the dentine makes its appearance in the follicle ; and then all the epithelial fragments, and the lamina itself, undergo gradual absorption, and entirely disappear before the develop- ment of the tooth is perfected. Coincidently with the phenomena thus effected at the expense of the ejrithelial lamina, a series of modifications jDrecisely analogous transpires also in the severed cord itself. From the remnants of this cord, buddings, or processes, issue, which, at times, are very numerous ; as we have wit- nessed, for example, in certain preparations taken from the jaws of bovine embryos. These phenomena continue for a consider- able length of time, since they can be ob- served up to a period even verging on the eruptive stage. The general form of these buddings may vary; sometimes they pre- sent somewhat the appearance of a bouquet, OF THE DENT \i. FOLLICLE. I I 9 (ihc Pool corresponding to the summit of the follicle,.) which spreads, open- and con- tinue- to expand till it reaches the vicinity of tlif epidermis ( Pig. 27, K ) ; a1 other times tlic\ form, by a multitude of reciprocal anastomoses, a perfect net-work (Fig. 29, E E), in tin- nii»l>t of which are still found some isolated masses. Hut these differently grouped or anasto- mosing buddings n<>t all follow the di- rection of the lamina, nor of the cord; in fact their general tendency is evidently toward the surface of the mucous mem- brane. The del>ris of the cord are invariably composed of small polyhedral cells lying in juxtaposition to each other, and exactly similar to those of the cord itself; bu1 the cells composing these debris, like those of the remains of the lamina, are never in- vested with a layer of prismatic cells. The buddings of the cord are also of variable size: some are extremely slender, 120 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION and composed of a single string of cells; others assume a strumous or swollen form, and contain several superimposed layers of these elements; but the large cells and the globular masses — the presence of which we have recognized in the debris of. the lamina — are never found here. The remains of the cord, like those of the epithelial lamina, after undergoing these multiplications, become gradually absorbed, and disappear, as was previously stated, at or about the period of eruption. While these j)henomena of buddings are taking place, at the expense of the debris of the cord, it will be noticed that a similar process is going on at the exterior surface of the follicular wall. These two series of phenomena, as well as those that take place in the lamina, are simultaneous."* In fact, if a vertical section be made of the region comprised between the summit * All this array of facts has been presented for the first time in France, by Robin and Magi tot. (Loc. cit., I860, p. 74.) 01 THE DENTAL FOLLICLE 12] of .-i follicle and the external surface of the epidermis, shorl ly after the rupture of I he cord has taken place, it will be seeu thai tlir remnants of this cord even extend t<> and mingle with some of the proliferations which arc adherenl bo tin- wall | sac |. These have the most varied forms; mostfrequently they are club-shaped expansions, or <-\ lin- ders of different lengths, terminating in a rounded extremity; and sometimes pro- vided with a kind of pedicle. They cover nearly the whole surface of that hemisphere of the follicle which is presented toward the epidermis. These buddings, however, are most abundant at the apex of the fol- licle [the point where the cord was at- tached], and they gradually diminish as they descend upon its sides. They anasto- mose transversely both with each other and with those that are attached to the cord: and in such a way that by simply examin- ing the surface of the follicle, without mak- ing a vertical section, we perceive a kind 122 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION of plexus with very irregular meshes, super- posed upon the follicular wall. (Fig. 29, b.) The auatomic structure of these bour- geons [or prolongations] on the surface of the follicle differs in no respect from those which we have indicated in the proliferations of the cord, being composed of the same small polyhedral cells minus the enveloping pris- matic layer. This identity of structure results from the fact that these epithelial masses are derived from the remains of that portion of the cord which is in the nearest proximity to the follicle, and which by proj3agating themselves thus finally constitute this retic- ular covering of the follicle. All these phenomena of epithelial pro- liferations relate, therefore, to one and the same process. Commencing with the lam- ina, these buddings extend to the cord, and finally even to the surface of the follicular wall; they are connected with each other, possess the same anatomical constituents, and all finally disappear by absorption [un- OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE 1 23 lesa it be some masses that may become fche enamel-organs of supernumerary teel ii. ( See ]». 66.)— Tb.] Wo ha. ve indicated in fche foregoing fche period at which fche phenomena of budding commence, namely, when fche epithelia] cord lias finished its course, having conducted fche primitive enamel-organ to that point where its subsequent evolution will be ef- fected, and soon after the formation of the secondary follicle; [in other words, immedi- ately after the rupture of tlfe cord of the primitive follicle]. The time of their dis- appearance varies in the different species of animals. In the human embryo the remains of the cord of the primitive follicles may be found even after the formation of the fol- licles of the permanent teeth, and it is prob- ably during the process of eruption that these buddings become atrophied: in fche canine embryo fche facts are nearly fche same: in fche bovine and ovine embryos (calf and lamb), it has seemed to ns thai these pro- 124 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION liferations disappear at a correspondingly earlier stage ; and we think it safe to say that, as a general rule, the complete absorp- tion occurs toward the period of eruption. The physiological signification of these phenomena appears to us difficult to deter mine. We have no personal opinion to ad- vance in this regard ; nevertheless we will say that, considering their mode of evolu- tion and their structure, no glandular char- acter whatever can be attributed to them, as some have supposed.* * Serres, as is known, described what he supposed to be special glands, tartaric glands, in the mucous mem- brane; and his views were supported by Kolliker, Todd and Bowman, and others. The anatomical nature of these epithelial masses, and the fact that the production of tartar is connected with quite different phenomena, leaves no foundation for this hypothesis. [I have not the works of Todd and Bowman at hand, but think Legros and Magitot must be mistaken in regard to the opinion of these authors upon this subject. As to the views of Kolliker, in the fourth edition of his Microscopical Anatomy, speaking of the "gum in the foetus, " he says: "The bodies of the size of a millet-seed, contained in it,, described by Serres, the so-called glandulce tartaricai, which are supposed to secrete the tartar of the teeth, are <>l THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 125 While the modifications jusl described are being effected at the expense of the epithelial debits of the cord and the lamina, the embryonic tissue in which the follicles arc immersed also changes it- nature, and some Laminated elements appear therein, forming a Loose and transparent aet-work. The osseous tissue of the jaw (no trace, of which is seen at the time of the origin of the primitive cord) makes its first ap- pearance near the base of the follicles, where it soon forms a horizontal layer, separating the groove of the follicles from the canal reserved for the vessels and nerves. Lateral processes then arise from this Layer or floor, and form the groove in aggregations of epithelium, and probably pathological," In his fifth, in place of the words " and probably patho- logical," the following are substituted: "which, according to my recent observations, are the remains of the embry- onal germ of the enamel-organ" [i.e., of the epithelial lamina]. The views of Kdlliker, and Legros and Magitot are then precisely the same on this point, so tar as they are expressed in these works, the only difference being in the form of expression. — Tk.J 126 THE ORIGIN" AND FORMATION" which the follicles lie for some time with- out being separated by transverse parti- tions. But later, after the development of the crowns of the teeth has commenced^ bony processes are thrown across this groove, forming cells for the lodgment of each follicle, with an opening toward the epithelial surface. A rich vascular network of tissue 'sur- rounds the follicle, and ramifies the sub- stance of the walls even to the surface of the enamel-organ, but does not penetrate it. The vessels of the bulb are entirely dis- tinct, forming no anastomosing connection with the preceding plexus. We shall, how- ever, have occasion to refer to these particu- lars hereafter, in treating of the morphology and structure of the follicle. OK IIIK DION I'M- lol.l.irl.K. 1 -7 CHAPTER V. THE PLACE, AM) MODE OF ORIGIN, OF THE FOLLICLES OF THE PERMANENT TEETH. r I T 1 1 E origin of the follicles of the per- -■- manent teeth is a problem that 1ms received particular attention from the more recent authors who have studied the evolu- tion of the teeth. It is one which we also have examined with the greatest care and ]>;itience; and we believe we have suc- ceeded in sol vino; it correctly. Since the publication of the works of Goodsir — in which that author held that the follicles of the permanent teeth arise from a fold of the sac of the primitive follicle — most anatomists have adopted his theory without examination or verification. This doctrine is no more in conformity with the tacts than is the theory that the 128 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION sacs of the temporary teeth are formed by an inversion of the mucous membrane. We have already given our views in regard to this hypothesis, and we will refer to it again at the close of this work. The theory of Goodsir will be found as errone- ous in regard to the permanent as it is to the temporary teeth. We ought to mention, however, that Kolliker and Waldeyer have come near the truth in indicating and illustrating certain prolongations of the primitive cord, which are destined to become the secondary cord. But in the most recent work pub- lished in Germany, that of Kollmann, the preceding interpretation is not adopted.* According to the views of this anatomist, the cord of the permanent teeth arises from the remnants of the primitive cord, which, after its rupture, produces those several buddings or epithelial masses which we have already described. He believes that * Kollmann, loc. cit., p. 162, etc. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 29 the enamel-organ of the permanent fcooth originates from a mass of those epithelial fragments. In a Like manner he accounts for the production of the supernumerary teeth.* This new theory is equally errone- ous; and if this German author lias been deceived by certain natural appearances, which might favor his opinion, it is because he has neglected to follow out strictly, in their successive physiological phases, the phenomena of this special evolution. Furthermore, the origin of those perma- nent follicles that have been preceded by corresponding temporary ones, is altogether different from that of those which had no such predecessors; so that while all of the twenty follicles of the permanent teeth that succeed the twenty temporary ones have a like origin, the twelve other foUicles (the molar- of the adult) have a different mode of genesis. | I'>\ this these author- mean, as will lie -ecu hereafter, that (ill the enamel- Bee note. pp. 65-6 of this work. — Tk.] 130 THE OBIGIN ATSTD FORMATION organs of the permanent teeth except those of the first molars, originate from the epi- thelial cords of other follicles, and not di- rectly from the epithelial lamina itself. — Te.] The facts we are about to advance have been gathered from the examination of a large number of mammalian embryos, com- prising a series of successive phases of de- velopment. In studying microscopical sec- tions taken from the jaws of human embryos measuring twenty centimetres from crown to heel, a bourgeon will be found at the point where the primitive cord merges into the enamel-organ of the temporary tooth. The general form of this bourgeon is cylin- drical, terminating in a somewhat enlarged extremity, which gives it a clubbed or gourd- like shape at this stage of evolution (Fig. 30, K), and may be seen quite distinctly with a low magnifying power of 100 to 200 diameters. [Fig. 22, K, represents this bour- geon at an earlier period]. It takes a general OF THE DENTAL l< l.l.h l.K. i.;i vertical direction, and passes between the osseous alveolar wall and the primitive fol- PlG. 30. — Section of the lower jaw of a human embryo, total length 30 centimeters, or about 8 inches; taken from the region of the follicle of the temporary molar (magnified 80 diameters). A', cord of the permanent follicle, "emanating" from that of tin- temporary molar; /•.'. eriamel-organ; /•'. cord of the temporary follicle; //. dentine-bulb; /. follicular wall: «, Meckel's cartilage: r (upper), section of the dental artery: c (lower I. that of the dental nerve; d, epithelial cells. 132 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION licle, along the internal or lingual face of the latter. The elements of which it is com- posed are the same as those of the primitive cord, of which it is in reality only a divertic- ulum or out-growth ; that is, of polygonons cells covered with a single layer of prismatic ones. This bourgeon or bud represents the be- ginning of the permanent tooth ; and after- it has become sufficiently developed, one can easily follow the subsequent phenomena of which it is the seat. It sinks to the bot- tom of the osseous dental groove, where it soon loses its connection with the primitive follicle, though still retaining its communi- cation with the lamina ; while the primitive follicle, by the severance of its cord (which takes place just below the point where the secondary cord branches off), becomes iso- lated from its epithelial connection and con- tinues its individual evolution. (Fig. 31.) It was, doubtless, by examining the jaws at the stage of development just referred to, OF NIK DKNTA I- FOLLICLE. L33 without taking into accounl the earlier and Later phases, that led to the belief thai the cord of the permanenl teeth emanated from l'i... 81. Fie 31. — Section of tin- lower jaw of a human foetuB, 23 centimeters in length [or 01., inches; corresponding to about the 18th week]. K, cord or bourgeon of the permanenl follicle; L, point where its separation from the primitive cord is being effected: g, enamel-organ; //. bulb; c, section of the dental artery; b, traces of ossification; c, (lower) nerve; a, Meckel's cartilage. 134 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION the debris of the primitive cord, or directly from the epithelial lamina. (Fig. 32, K.) The descent of the secondary bourgeon Pig. 32. Zr--:^-— rs %m^_ ^B-l) Fig. 32. — Vertical cut of the lower jaw of a human foetus, measuring 47 centimeters [18^ inches, and corresponding to about the 39th week of gestation]. This figure represents a section passing through the follicle of a bicuspid. K' K', epidermal masses; K, debris of the secondary cord; g, en- amel-organ; H, bulb; b, bone of the jaw; d, epidermis. OF THE DKNTAL FOLLtt LB. 1 35 into the dental groove is soon followed by the entire Beries of phenomena which are common to everj follicular evolution, . . . [and which are precisely the same as those already described for the primitive bour- geons. | ( Pig. 32, K.) While these phases of development are being accomplished, certain modifications occur in the parts which Burround the prim- itive follicle. The stump of the ruptured cord, which remains attached to the prim- itive follicle, becomes the source of those frag- mentary growths and buddings which have been described at considerable length in a preceding paragraph. These phenomena commence in the human embryo when it has attained about twenty-three centimeters [or nine and one-fourth inches] in length, about the fourth month. These phenom- ena, which always commence front the mo- ment the cord is severed, seem to occur in the embryos of other mammals a little earlier, relatively, in tin1 period of gesta- 136 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION tion. This is the case in equine and bovine embryos. Besides, in the lower animals the secondary bourgeon emanates from the primitive cord at a point a little farther from the primitive follicle than in the hu- man species. This is also the case in the ovine embryo. Casper : I have just been reading a treatise styled the Anatomical, Physiological and Mi- croscopical Researches on the Teeth, by Dr. J. E. Oudet, a French writer, whose opinion, it seems to me, is entitled to considerable respect. He most emphatically denies that any of the perma- nent follicles are derived either from the cords or from follicles of the temporary teeth ; on the contrary, he claims that they emanate, directly and independently, from the " mucous mem- brane." It seems very strange that there should be such wide differences of opinion in regard to a simple anatomical fact. Teacher: Nearly all of the most eminent histologists of the present day, — Tomes, Kolliker, Waldeyer, Frey, Owen, Wedl, and I know not how many others, entertain essentially the same views in regard to this phenomenon as are here OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 137 set forth by Drs. Legros and Magitot. There are, however, a few distinguished writers, foremost among whom is the author you named, who believe that all the permanenl teeth originate independently of the temporary set. Then, # again, we have one histologist, our neighbor, Dr. (t. \r. Black, of Illinois, whose extensive obser- vations in this direction have convinced him that, although tin- epithelial c<>r descent into the jawsj always assumes a spiral form, and thus perfectly resembles the duct <>t" the sudorific gland in the epidermis. This special disposition is so marked a characteristic in the secondary cord, that it may be readily distinguished from the temporary cord: for though the latter describes some sinuosities in its course, it is never so distinctly spiral as the former. The necessity for this greater spvraMty in the cord of the perma- nent follicle may be explained l>v the fact that it must traverse the more developed tissue of the jaw to a greater distance in attending this follicle in its passage to a point beneath that of the temporary tooth; [and also to allow the rapidly developing parts to increase the distance between the follicle and the epithelial lamina, without straining the cord or disturbing the parts I" which its two ends are attached. — Tr.1 The spiral character of the secondary 142 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION cord is especially obvious near its point of origin, and in the first half of its course ; but toward its terminal extremity it dimin- ishes, and finally disappears entirely, giving place to a rounded club-shaped enlargement exactly like that which we have described at the extremity of the primitive cord. This enlargement or expansion represents the enamel-organ of the permanent tooth. When the series of evolutionary phenom- ena has brought the new follicle to the period in which, in the human embryo, for example, the bulb becomes wnicuspid for the canines and incisors and multicuspid for the molars, the epithelial cord, which has already been sometime severed from the primitive follicle, becomes in its turn rupt- ured. From this period the secondary fol- licle, as well as the primitive, is found iso- lated from all connection with the epithelial lamina during the subsequent phases of its evolution. This rupture is soon followed by new OF l III DENTAL FOLLICLE. 14.*'. subdivisions in the substance <>t the cord itself, which seems to separate into frag- ments of various sizes. These fragments Lengthen and l>u\ an entirely different mod'- of genesis. The first permanent molar, the follicle of which become- considerably developed in foetal life, is derived from an epithelial cord which 144 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION originates directly from the epithelial lamina. This cord penetrates the foetal tissue in a region where no follicle has preceded it. (Sum, of Illus., Fig. 39.) The origin of the second molar is similar to that of the first twenty permanent teeth, the follicle being produced from a diver- ticulum or outgrowth of the cord of the first molar. In this respect the second mo- lar sustains the same relation to the first, that the permanent tooth does to the cor- responding deciduous one. But they differ in the direction taken by the epithelial cords ; for, while those derived from the cord of the temporary follicle pass over- the lingual face of the latter to a point beneath them, that of the second molar takes a hori- zontal course for some distance, and then by an inflection takes its position at the posterior side of the follicle of the first molar, where it is developed in a line with those anterior to it, (Sum. of Illus., Fig. 35.) As regards the last molar, or tvisdom tooth, its origin is OF THE DENIAL FOLLICLE. I 15 effected in a manner similar to thai which we have just described ; thai is, the epithelial cord that produces its enamel-organ is an emanation from the cord of the second molar. We must acknowledge, however, that in determining the origin of this tooth we have encountered many difficulties, owing to its position and to the alteration in the tissue-, caused by the many reactions to which the jaws, after they have acquired considerable size and hardness, must neces- sarily be submitted. And yet, we have, in several cases, been enabled to determine, with almost positive certainty, that the cord of the wisdom tooth originates in the manner we have already indicated. From these observations we perceive that, while the first molar originates, as we have seen, from the epithelial lamina itself, it becomes, through the medium of its cord, the source from which the follicles of the succeeding molars are derived. However this may be, with these excep- 146 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION tions in the mode of genesis of the follicles, all the evolutionary phenomena are iden- tical, to whichever dentition they may be- long; nevertheless the order in which their evolution is accomplished and the duration of their physiological phenomena differ. For, while the follicles of the first dentition are developed during the period embraced between the latter part of the third month of gestation and the beginning of the fourth war (within forty-two months), most of the follicles of the second dentition require a much longer time for their evolution. For example, though the follicle of the first molar makes its appearance in the fif- teenth week of embryonal life (and only a few days after the most of th<:»e of the first dentition ). yet it d<>es not complete its evo- lution until about the sixth year. We see, therefore, that though the evolutionary phenomena of the follicles are identical in other respects, they cover periods that vary according to the nature and the temporal) or permanent character of the future teeth. OF TIIK DKNTAL FOLLICLE. 147 CHAPTER VI. CHRONOLOGY OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE, OR THE PERIODS IN WHICH ITS SEVERAL COMPONENT PARTS APPEAR. TN pursuing our researches on the mode -*" of formation of the dental follicle in mammals, we have constantly kept in view one important question, namely, the deter- mination of the periods at which the sev- eral organs that enter into its constitution make their appearance. This study has necessitated the careful examination of a large number of embryos, both human and of the principal domestic mammals. An- other fact to be ascertained was, the exact age of the subjects upon which our observa- tions were made. This, in the absence of positive evidence as to the period of concep- tion, must, in most eases, be determined by measurement. Xow. while the relation be- 148 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION tween the size and the age of the human embryo has been determined with great accuracy, by the aid of statistics collected from the reports of various authors ; yet, up to the present time no sufficiently accurate data of this nature have been given con- cerning the other species of mammals in their successive stages of embryonal life. In the human species, (the study of which affords us more interest than that of any other, and may be more usefully applied,) we have made numerous observations upon a series of embryos measuring from 8 to 37 centimetres \\\ to 15 inches] in length, i.e. from the seventh to the twenty-eighth week of intra-uterine life. From these we have been enabled to fix all the periods of the evolution of the follicles of the first, and some of those of the second, dentition. We have established the other phases of the second dentition by the study of sub- jects in the later stages of fcetal life, and at different periods after birth. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 4!> The smallest of these embryos, thai of 3 centimeters | 1 J inches], (seventh week,) from which we have made vertical sec- tions through the entire Pace (Pig. 7). has enabled us to determine that at this period no point of ossification is yet found upon any part of the cranium or of the face; the lower jaw alone presents some rudimentary osseous arches in tin- vicinity of Meckel's cartilage. This fact is in con- formity with the observations published in n memoir on Meckel's cartilage, in 1862, by Drs. Robin and Magitot. At this period in embryonal lite the jaws otter nothing for our consideration, relating to the evolution of the follicles, except the epithelial band, which is Pound to be alike in both jaws (Fig. 7), ami which we have already described. The follicle has not as yet appeared in these rudimentary parts, nor even the first trace of the epithelial lamina. The second embryo submitted to our 150 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION observation was 5^ centimetres* [2£ inches] in -length, say of two months. From this we ascertain that the formation of the dental groove commences at this period of develop- ment, and that the epithelial cords represent- ing the enamel-organs are very clearly de- fined ; the dental bulb has already made its appearance as an opaque point in the region previously designated as its place of origin. This period of development, compared with the preceding, has enabled us to fix the time of the appearance of the epithelial lamina between the seventh and eighth weeks of embryonal life; and the genesis of the enamel-organ from the epithelial cord, about the eighth week. Moreover, from these examinations we have been able to determine the important fact that development progresses at the same rate in both jaws, as well as in all the follicles of the first dentition, whether they be of the incisors, the canines or the * [A centimetre = 0.39371, or say \ of an inch; a milli- metre is TV of this, or ^ of an inch.— Tr. OP THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. L51 molars. Upon a third embryo, which measured 71 centimetres [3 inches], cor- responding to the eleventh week, we dis- covered thai the stages of development for each of the follicles of the first den- tition were identical, and that the bull) had become uni-eit.yid for the incisors and canines, and rmdti-ciLspid for the molars. The walls which had already risen from the base of the bulb were not yet united at the summit of the follicle, and the epi- thelial cord was still entire. The bulb now consists of amorphous matter inter- spersed with nuclei, though its external surface presents a membranous appearance. The enamel-organ is distinctly stellated, and the cells that constitute the external epi- thelium are becoming smaller as compared with those of the internal epithelium [the ameloblasts]. No trace of the secondary cord is ye1 aeen. From our observations on a fourth em- bryo, of 11 centimetres [4$ inches |, sa\ 152 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION of twelve weeks, we ascertained that at this period the follicular walls are not- closed, and that no trace of the dentine- cap is yet visible. The next embryo examined (measuring 15 centimetres [6- inches], indicating thirteen weeks,) showed no perceptible difference in development as compared with the former. In an embryo of 20 centimetres [8- inches] (say at the commencement of the fourth month) we collected some valuable facts in regard to certain ulterior phases of evolution. At this epoch the primitive follicular cord has not yet become severed, nor the follicle closed. A little cap of dentine is seen very clearly outlined in some, though, not in all, of the follicles of the temporary dentition. It is, in fact, at the exact period! when a slight trace of ivory is formed that we discovered the first chronological differ- ence in the development of the follicles of the temporary teeth. For while the inci- OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 153 sors and the canines are now pro\ ided with a cap of embryonal dentine, it does noi ap- pear upon the molars until about a week later. The l>ull> [dentine-germ] has now the exact form of the crown of the future tooth; its base has already become con- stricted and is embraced by the margins of the enamel-organ, which is already com- pletely constituted, with its internal layer of cells [ameloblasts], and the stratum >n- t< rmedium well defined. It is also at this period <>f development that we first sec, emanating from the primi- tive cord, those buddings which are des- tined to form the secondary cords, or the enamel-organs of the permanent teeth. All these bourgeons (or buds) representing the commencenienl of the permanent follicles. are, in both jaws, at the same stage of evo- lution | in other words these enaniel-lmds stall simultaneously ]. From an embryo of nearly the same di- mensions as the preceding (23^ centimetres 11 154 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION [9£ inches] in length, and corresponding to the eighteenth or nineteenth week), we have fixed the epoch at which the separation of the secondary cord from that of the primi- tive follicle takes place. The latter now becomes isolated from the epithelial lamina and continues its evolution without any further connection with this tissue. (Fig. 31, p. 133.) The permanent follicle, how- ever, still remains attached to the cord, and, by the lajbter, to the epithelium. We direct attention to these facts, because in neglect- ing to take account of the successive phases of evolution one might be led to believe that the follicles of the permanent teeth originate directly from the epithelial lamina, and not from the cords of the temporary teeth. This last mode of genesis is, on the contrary, definite and invariable for all the follicles of the permanent teeth which have been preceded by corresponding temporary teeth, that is to say, for twenty of the teeth of the second dentition; viz., the eight in- OF Tin: iiknta L FOLLI4 LE. 1 55 cisors, tlic four (•.•mine-- and the eight pre- molars [bicuspids]. It will be seen thai the other follicles of the permanent teeth have a diiferenl origin. The sections taken from the jaws df the embryo ( l'" centi- metres in Length) have enabled us t<> deter- mine positively tin- period and tin- mode <»f genesis <>f the cord of the first permanent molar, which is not. as is known, preceded by a corresponding temporary tooth. This genesis takes place at the extremity of the epithelial lamina; and since, in the embiyo above named, the epithelial cord had al- ready acquired considerable length, we may reasonably conclude that its develop- ment commenced about the seventeenth week of gestation. (Fig. 39, ISumma/ry.) At this epoch, when the separation of the temporary follicles from the cord of the corresponding permanent ones takes place, there appears also the firsl trace of those phenomena of buddings and of divers pro- liferations of the debris of this primitive 156 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION cord and of the epithelial masses on the walls, — particularities which were first de- scribed in France.* By the examination of other human embryos ranging from 27 to 37 centimetres [lOf to 15 inches], and up- ward, we have been able to fix the subse- quent phases of evolution, not only of the temporary follicles, but also those of the permanent teeth. These successive studies have thus brought us up to, and even be- yond, the period of birth. In this manner we have been enabled to establish two points which remained to be elucidated in this order of researches, namely : the mode and epoch of the evolution of the follicles of the second and third permanent molars. The results to which we have arrived in regard to these, are the following : On ex- amining sections taken from the jaws of subjects two or three months after birth, we discover in the region occupied by the follicle of the first permanent molar, a pro- * See Robin et Magitot, loc. cit., p. 75. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. I •) i vc>< or prolongation, cylindrical in form, emanating from the epithelial cord of the latter follicle, and which takes a horizontal and backward direction, terminating in a bullions extremity. This prolongation is the commencement of the follicle of the second permanent molar. Thus we fix the date of the origin of this follicle at the third month after birth. At about the third year of infancy the epithelial bour- geon that represents the enamel-organ of the third molar originates from the cord of the preceding tooth, that is, the second per- niaiicnt molar. According to the numerous observations we have made, this date may lie regarded as very nearly accurate, though tin' difficulties of which we have already spoken have prevented us from following out the successive phases of evolution in a very rigid manner. Yet that a little cap of dentine is visible in this follicle about the twelfth year. is true beyond a doubt. Without continuing further the long 158 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION analysis of the many anatomical prepara- tions we have made, we will present a sum-' mary of them all in a tabular form. In this are indicated the age and size of vari- ous embryos corresponding with the suc- cessive phases of follicular evolution. This table is the first which has yet appeared giving these in such a complete and exact manner. An examination of this table enables one to see at a glance the different phases of dental evolution in man. The indications which it furnishes are founded on the ex- amination of a considerable number of sec- tions ; and consequently they appear to us to show great accuracy. Aside from their physiological interest, they not only have an important bearing upon the complex teratology of the dental system, but are especially valuable in a surgical point of view. There will be found, in fact, some valuable data concerning certain anomalies, whether in the position, direction, or in the OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 159 different arrangements of the dental system. Besides they throw Ligh.1 upon the pathog- ony of certain follicular cysts and help to fix the period at which these pathological productions make their appearance, as well as thai of certain derangements of nutri- ■ tion, — the odontomes, for example. We believe, then, that it will be found service- able in certain cases in practice. The results of the observations we have made -on other species of mammals have been less conclusive; sometimes on account of the head only being placed at our dis- posal, and sometimes owing to the change of size and form that they have experienced bj prolonged maceration; and finally in consequence of the absence of all statistics establishing the coiTespondence between the age and length of the animal. Cer- tain of them have, however, enabled us to gather some useful data which we will here present. 160 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION „S 5S . 53 0 r= * OS'S 0-=.=: B « E "S o £. ai ,?■£ « 3 03 ^ DO) O) >a OS £J QJ 0) ,B OJ 0 J) •5 . :'c ^'BflBo 5 5 ■£ 5 B S B fl O O o - SES ■=£-c'£5 £•£■£■£.£ COOOO rp^TQOO pass o o s o ESSE SO TH ,£ 03 " <£ c3 .3 ^ :- c/j ^ ~ fl 03 O.B CC3 •C « os S a OjjS C SCO, S ' OB B 13 M o 'E o o2" o-S 03 O^.S SOS o s 03 -~ E JT » OJ && •noijpuag jCjjdcaox « ^.i'u »£ ti - ' S33^^oSpo3 , • 52 — .~ rv-— o^«h?OcOh S b"~« &2 ••= a . S B S a §S-"«^5«-'b. . -; -„• d. . ri . ti H^H'^HXr4iH5(5lrHi-(«WO:CO •uoiipnaQr inaaBtu.iarf OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 6 1 Iii the canine species our observations have been limited to the examination of a lew Dew-bora puppies; accordingly the Pacts concerning the chronology of the dental follicle in this animal are very few. We have, however, ascertained, that at the period of birth, the follicles of the first dentition are already provided with a cap of dentine; that the cord of the permanent incisors has made its appearance, and that in l he centrals we can already discern the first traces of the dental bulbs. In the ovine and bovine species our studies have extended to a large Dumber of embryos, but owing to the absence of information we have not been able to determine their exact ages. We proceed, however, to give some of our observations, taking into considera- tion simply the length of the animals ex- amined. In an ovine embryo of 4l} milli- metres | about 1 v inches] in length (Figs, 16 and 1 (.), Summary of Flhts.} we find on the edge of the jaws only the bourrelet, 162 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION or projecting band, with no trace of the epithelial lamina. But when the embryo has attained 52 millimetres [2 inches] we perceive the epithelial lamina well devel- oped. (Figs. 17 and 18, Summary of lllus.) In an embryo of 65 millimetres no addi- tional change is percejrtible in the develop- ment ; yet with a magnifying power of about 300 diameters one can study in this the con- stituent elements of the lamina. (Fig. 18, Summary of -Illus.) When the embryo has attained 72 mil- limetres [about 3 inches] the extremity of the lamina shows a very marked enlarge- ment, which represents the enamel-organ of the future tooth. (Fig 21, Gr, Summary?) Ajb a little more advanced period, in an embryo measuring 82 millimetres [31 inches], the enamel-organ and the dentine- bulb have completed their formation, and the follicular wall has made its appearance at the base of the bulb. (Figs. 26 and 28, Summary?) OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. I 63 When the embryo has attained 1 1 \ cen- timetres 1 4.1 inches] we observe thai the walls arc completed, ami closed around the epithelial cord which is about to be rup- tured. At this period, also, we discover the first appearance of the dentinecap. Such arc the tacts wc have collected from the embryonal Lambs which we have been able to procure. In the bovine embryo our observation-, in a chronological point of view, have been much more limited, the head- only of these embryos having been placed at our dis- posal, without any information as to the period of gestation. These specimens, how- ever, have enabled us to furnish some de- scriptive details which are very distinctly shown in this animal. ( Pigs. 38, 41 and 42, Summary.) We will state, however, that in a foetus of eighl months we have found the temporary incisor teeth quite fully devel oped, the follicle of the permanent incisors complete, ami the dentine-cap beginning to form. 164 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION Our observations have been made upon equine embryos of different ages. From these we have determined certain facts in relation to the various phases of follicular evolution. For the first three embryos we are indebted to the courtesy of M. Raynal, of the veterinary school at Alfort. In the youngest of these (14 weeks) the enamel- organ of the central nippers (incisors) are already formed, and the bulb has made its appearance. For the lateral nippers the enamel-organ is just beginning to show it- self. These facts indicate that the evolu- tion of the follicles varies in point of time in the different incisors; whereas the evolu- tion of the follicles of these teeth in man and other mammals appeal's to be synchro- nous. For the molars, it is found that at this same epoch the bulb has appeared for all the follicles of the first dentition, as have also the first traces of the follicular wall. In a second embryo (of 27 weeks) the follicles of the central incisors are closed, OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 165 while those of the firsi lateral incisors are jusl beginning to exhibit the l>nll>s; and those of the second lateral incisors only the enamel-organ. These facts, as we see, ad- ditionally confirm the unequal development of the different incisors in this animal. In the molars the facts are analogous; the fol- licle of the first temporary molar is closed at this date, while the enamel-organ of the second lias only just made its appearance, and no trace of that of the third molar is yet visible. It is at this period, also, that the first indication of the enamel-organ appears for the first permanent molar. In a third embryo, measuring 255 mil- limetres [10 inches |, corresponding to about 28.1 weeks, the follicles of the permanent in- cisors are closed and complete; the enamel- organ is well developed. The ameloblasts of the interior bed are verj large, and the external epithelial layer has already disap- peared,* bul no t race of dentine yet appears. * [The above statement, concerning the early disappear- ance of the external epithelial layer of the enamel-organ, is 1(t6 ♦ THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION The follicles of the permanent incisors have arrived at the period when the enamel- organ already caps the bulb, which is just appearing, but is not yet constricted at its base. (Fig. 29, K, Summary.} For the tem- porary molars the follicles are about equal- ly developed. They are closed and well formed, but without any appearance of the dentine-cap. The organ of coronal cement is already beginning to manifest itself. From the fragments of the ruptured epi- thelial cord numerous buddings have been produced. From the fourth (an equine foetus of 31^ weeks), owing to a very prolonged macera- tion in alcohol, we were prevented from de- riving much advantage. We were only able to determine that the temporary folli- cles were fully developed and provided with caps of dentine of considerable thickness. Some fragments of the epithelial cord (long since broken, without doubt,) were still re- evi den tly erroneous ; the sections examined which led to this opinion were probably defective. — Tr.] * OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 <»7 maining. The organ of corona] cement was fully developed. We will conclude these chronological con- siderations with a few notes relative t<» the rodents: In an embryonal guinea-pig of 2 centimetres | J inch] in total Length, which appeared to correspond to about the middle period of gestation, the follicle was at the stage when the enamel-organ, in form of a hood, covers the bulb; there was no follicu- lar wall or dentine-cap apparent. In another embryo of the same species, of 4 centimetres | 1 1 inches] in length, the temporary follicles were formed, and their stages of development were nearly the same. They were provided with a dentine-cap, covered with a thin layer of enamel. In the rabbit we discover that, at birth, the incisors have effected their eruption, the molar- -till enclosed, but already capped with thick layer- of dentine and enamel. Beneath the temporary molars we observe the presence of the permanent follicles, already provided 168 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION with a thin but distinctly manifest layer of dentine. We will not pursue these considerations further, which are of less interest in the lower mammals than in man, in regard to whom we have presented a large number of examples. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 0'.» CHAPTER VII. CBITICISM OF THEORIES l.'IM Ml". VXD CONi USIONS. npiIK problem of the genesis and forma- -*- tion of the dental follicle in mammals has, for a loni: time, l>een the subject of numerous researches, and lias given rise t<> many theories. The relatively early period in embryonic lite at which these phenomena commence; the difficulties attending the preparation of the specimens (the treat- ment by different reagents to which they must be submitted, etc.), are so many causes which have retarded the progress of exact knowledge regarding the embryogenic evo- lution of these organs. The question has passed through numerous phases, and, with- out going l>aek very far in its history, and without presenting the opinions of ancienl authors, imbued with preconceived notions 12 170 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION of the nature of the teeth, or strangers to the processes of investigation of the modern anatomical -school, we will say that in going back no farther than the middle of the last century we find that Herissant* having con- ceived that he found on the surface of the mucous membrane of the gums certain small depressions, considered them to be orifices of canals communicating with the dental follicles. This opinion, which rested on no anatomical fact, was adopted by only a few authors (Bonn, 1773; Oudet, 1835). According to the theory of Herissant, which we find at a later day more clearly presented by Groodsir, the mucous mem- brane of the gums would be the point of origin of the follicle, the wall of which would be developed before the follicle it- self. In 1835,f in an important work, * Nouvelles recherches sur la formation de V email des dents et sur celle des gencives. Mem. de VAcad. Paris, 1754. f Meletemata circa dentium mammalium evolutione Vratis- larice. In. 4°, 1835, p. 12. OF THE DENTAL FOLLK LE. 171 Rasdikow advanced tin- theory that the dental follicle is produced al the inner face of the mucous membrane, without the- nec- essary participation of the latter; however, he does not specify which of the organs of the follicle appeals first, nor how the others are produced. Nevertheless, Henle,* Bis- choff,f and KollikerJ (in the first edition of his microscopical anatomy) support his opinion. A few years later appeared the work of Goodsir,§ in which is formulated that well-known theory according to which both the temporary and the permanent fol- licles originate directly from the mucous membrane itself. Immediately adopted, without verification by the majority of au- thors, it is even now nearly the only theory found in the greater number of treatises on *Anat. i/i'ii. 1845, p. Hi i via I. FOLLICLE. I To a work* in which he endeavored t<> show thai the teeth are developed without the slightest participation of the mucous mem- brane; that it is from a mass originating in tlic depth of the embryonal tissue that the follicle is produced. This mass he calls the i nit ml spheroid, or primitive trace of the tooth, lie describes in this " spheroid " thre<' divisions: a central one. which he names the nnch-ns. representing' the bulb ,' an intermediate one surrounding the other, the < ma/niel-orga/n ; and lastly, the external one, which will become organized to form a membrane, he calls the dental sac. From this description, as a whole, it is easy to see that N. Gruillot has limited himself to the examination and figuring of sections made through follicles which are in an advanced stage of evolution, and that he has not hit upon the mode of origin of the component parts <>f the organ and their successive * Recherche* sur In genise >-t V evolution dee dents ft des Mdchoirea. Ann. des 8C. nut., IV" sc'rii', t. IX, 1858. 174 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION phases of development. This work, then, has thrown no light upon the question. Several years later (in 1860) appeared in France an extended work, published by M. Ch. Robin, in connection with one of the authors of this work.* This memoir contained a complete theory of follicular evolution, according to which the dental bulb is the first part of the follicle that appears in the depth of the jaws, at the bottom of the groove and in the vicinity of the principal vessels and nerves ; afterward the enamel-organ is seen ; and then the wall emanating from the bulb, and rising upon the sides of these organs so as to surround them and to unite at the apex of the folli- cle. Whatever may be the accuracy of the descriptions in this work, it is evident that its authors misconceived the true order of the genesis of the follicle ; for in reality the enamel-organ makes its appearance before the bulb. * Robin et Magitot, M6tnoire cit<5 Journal de physiologie de Brown-Sequard, 1860-61. OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 1 75 Whence comes this error in the interpre- tation of the very first phenomena of folli- cular evolution? It results evidently from the too exclusive mode of examination which was adopted; for the observations were made upon preparations of follicles gradually flattened between two plates of glass. Very few sections were made. The authors wished thereby to preserve, in their reciprocal relations all the parts which they dissected, for the purpose of further re- searches in detail. The fear of deforming the sections and disturbing the relations which sometimes result from cuttings made upon masses of tissues somewhat thick, and we must say the insufficiency of the processes of hardening known at that period, — all these combined singularly to Lead these anatomists into the error that they have there committed. The question was at this point, wheo Kolliker discovered (1863*) the existence * Die Enttoicklung der Zahnsdckchen der Wiederk&uer. Zeitschr. f. Wissen. Zool. 18G3. Gewebelehre, 4 Aufl. 176 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION of an epithelial band subjacent to the gin- gival ridge of the mucous membrane, and which extends the entire length of the jaws. This continuous lamina Kolliker calls the enamel-organ; but we regard it only as a simple dependence of the epithe- lial band. The term enamel-organ does not appear to us to be appropriate to a lamina which does not contribute directly to the formation of the follicle, since it is upon a certain number of points of this that bour- geons appear, from which the enamel-organs are directly developed. These bourgeons are in number equal to that of the future teeth; and in the intervals between the bourgeons, or enamel-organs, the epithelial lamina remains unchanged. Whatever may be said of the interpreta- tion of them, the views of Kolliker are very just ; and they became the starting-point of a series of observations which gave to the question of the evolution of the dental fol- licle an entirely new aspect. Two facts OF THE DENTAL FOLLICLE. 177 were from that time settled, namely, that the enamel-organ appears as the firsl con- stituent part of the follicle, and that its origin is epithelial. Upon this last poinl tin- views previously pur forth by Marcuses and Huxley were continued." Following the work of Kolliker are grouped a consid- erable number of researches emanating from his pupils, or coining from other German schools. Such are the memoires of Wal- deyer, Hertz, Wendzel, Kollmann, etc. f * Marcusen, Ueber die Entwicklung der Z&hne. Bulletin de VAcad. imperiale de Saint Petersbourg, 1849. Huxley, Quint. Journal of Microscopical Science, 1854, 1855. 1857. fWaldeyer, Untersuch. uber die Entwicklung der Z&hne: I Abth. Konigsberg und Jahrbttcher IV. Bd. 1864; II Abth. Zeitschr. fur rat. Med.; Ill, 24 Bd. 1865.— IV. Bau und Entwicklung der Z&hne in Strieker, Handbuch der Lehre ton den Gewehen. Leipzig, 1871, p. 333 et Buiv.— Hertz, Untersuchungen uberfeineren Ban und die Entwicklung der Z&hne. Virch. Arch. 1866, Bd. 37; id., Kin Full von geheiUer Zahnfractur mit nachfolgender Schnielzbildunff. Virch. Arch. 1806. 2* Bd. — Wendzel, Untersuchungen fiber das Schtnehorgan und den Schnieh. etc. Arch, von ILkde. 1868, p. 97.— Kollmann, Entwicklung der Milch und Ersatz- z&hne beim Menschen. Zeitschrifl fur Wissenschaftliche Zoologie, von Seibold und KSlliker; Zwanzigster Baud. Zweitea Heft. p. 145. Leipzig, 1870. 178 THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION In these different works the idea of Kolliker is taken at the initial point. Wal- deyer described exactly the descent of the cord, and the formation of the component parts of the follicle. He indicates, also, that the follicles of the permanent teeth arise from buddings from the primitive cords; but he fails to mention, in regard to them, the different modes of genesis, and also the precise points where this genesis takes place. He points out, moreover, in his last publica- tion,* the unsettled difficulties which exist in these questions, notwithstanding the nu- merous works published upon this subject. Hertz and Wendel support the opinions promulgated by Kolliker and Waldeyer, without adding anything new to the ques- tion of the origin of the follicle. They have, however, advanced some new ideas upon other points of follicular evolution, which we will discuss on another occasion. As to Kollmann, the last German anato- *See in Strieker, loc. cit. 1871, p. 352 (English Edition). 01 I Hi: DENTAL I oi.i.it 1.1 . 1 79 mist who has studied the question, lit- adopts unhesitatingly the views of Kolliker ;m/-o»2gv fe*A Sit 210 SUMMARY. Fig. 43. — Vertical transverse section of the lower jaw of a human foetus, 56 centimetres [22f inches] in length; corresponding to about the period of birth. (Magnified 80 diam.) b, Osseous formation; d, oral epithelium; E, lowest layer of the Malpighian stratum; F, debris of the epithelial lamina; g, enamel-organ; H, dental bulb; I, follicular wall; j, cap of dentine and enamel; K, debris of the second- ary cord; L, bulb of the permanent tooth, capped with the enamel-organ. Fig. 44. — Dental follicle of a permanent tooth of a cat; vertical and transverse section. From a preparation of Thiersch. (Magnified 14 diam.) Taken from the fifth edi- tion of Kolliker's Elements of Human Histology. A, Dental bulb, the external zone of which is formed by the odontoblasts; b, dentine; c, enamel; d, "internal epithe- lial layer of the adamantine organ or adamantine mem- brane" [the layer of prismatic or columnar cells that we denominate ameloblasts]; e, gelatinous tissue of the en- amel-organ [stellate reticulum]; /, external epithelial layer of the adamantine organ [enamel -organ]; g, internal layer of the dental sac or follicular wall; h, external layer of the same. [The white space seen between the layer of ameloblasts and the developing enamel is evidently accidental. See remarks on Fig. 24.] t^'iv £v»'tv e — £ |$K I;A> K INDEX Adamantine membrane, 22, 109 Aggregations of epithelium, 125 Amelification, 91 Ameloblasts, 83, 91, 109, 151, 153 Amorphous layer, 17, 101 Apophyses, 28 Atrophy of Meckel's Cartilage, 37 Authors' introduction, 47 Bar of the solipeds, diastema, 55 Basement membrane, 14, 17, 21, 24, 88 and 89 Bourgeons, 28, 44, 122, 130 primitive, 135 secondary, 134, 136 Bourrelet, epithelial band, 54 Cartilago dentalis, 54 Cell, apology for use of the term, 44 Cells, epidermal, 25 epithelial, in different stages of development, 20 aculeated, imbricated, prickle, spinous, ridged, 20 columnar, 21, 23 cylindrical, 21 polygonous, 22, 116, 132 prismatic, 21, 81, 83 Cement, coronal, 111 Cemental organ. 111 Chronology of the dental follicle, periods of appearance of its parts, 147 Chronological table of dental follicle, 160 Corium, 12, 14 Cord of temporary teeth, 128 permanent teeth, 128 Corneous stratum, 15, 17, 19, 20, 23 Corneous leaf or plate, of Remak, 18 Cortical layer of enamel-organ, 82 Cuticle, 17 Cutis vera, 14 Definition of foetus, embryo, follicle and bourgeon, 41 Dental follicle, 89, 105, 111 its genesis and formation, theories of criticised, 169 INM-.X. 213 Dental follicle, definition of, 42 origin and formation of, 4!) Dental germ, 107 groove. 135. 150 • sacs, LOT sacculus, 42, '.'s Dentine-bulb, 25, 42,75,90,100, L12 origin and growth of, 98 I)entine-cap. 152 Dentinal papilla, 25, 42, 75. 96 Dentinal sheet of tissue, 66 Dermal stratum, 21 tissues, 16 Dermis (derm or dermal, 12, 14. 16, 24. 2G Diagram of mucous membrane. 13 Diastema, or bar. 55 Diverticulum, 132 ' . Double pellucid layer, between ameloblasts and tissues ot pulp. H8 Early development of the jaws, 27 Ecderon and enderon, 14 _ _ . , 1Aft Embryos, canine, ovine, bovine and equine, studyot, lbi to iw Kmbryoplastic elements of incipient dental-bulb, 95, 1WJ Enamel, formation of, due to internal epithelium. 82, »6 Enamel-cells, ameloblasts, 83 -membrane, 22 Enamel-organ, 21, 42, 83. 90, 93, 96, 151 its development, 65 as fully developed, 75 as part of the dental follicle, 107 of the permanent tooth. 142 Enamel-organs of supernumerary t< eth, 66 Epiblast, 18, 25 Epidermal cells. 25 membrane, Is stratum. 21 Epidermis, 11, 14. 1!). 114. 119 Epithelial band, description of. 54. 58, 62, 14!) Kiilliker's discovery of, 175. 176 Epithelial cord, 66. 150 as determining the place and form of tooth. .». when its course is finished, 123 of permanent follicles, point_ of origin, 13 1, 138 in embryo of two months, 150 Epithelial lamina, its origin and development, 62 at the period the enamel-organ loses connection with it. 105 214 INDEX. Epithelial lamina, phenomena located in it after rupture of cord, 115 sometimes the place of origin of cords of anterior permanent teeth, 13? place of origin of the cord of first permanent mo- lar, 143, 144 proliferations, phenomena of, 121, 122 Epithelial ridg'e or band, its origin, etc., 51 Epithelium, 11, 13, 18, 112 pavimentous or tessellated, 20 Errors of early observations, cause of, 175 External germinal layer, or epiblast, 18 osseous arch, 35 First permanent molar, its place of origin, 144 Follicle, definition of, 43 epithelial proliferations upon, 121 Follicular wall, 42, 108 network of vessels upon, 112 buddings upon, 120, 122 not closed at twelfth week, 152 Formation of enamel, due to internal epithelium, 82, 83 Formed material, Beale, 22, 23 Fusiform bodies, composing incipient dental bulb, 95 Genesis and growth of the dental follicle, theories of criti- cised, 169 of follicle, true order of, 174 of follicle, etc., summary of facts concerning, 180, 181 of follicle, conclusions regarding, 181 to 184 Glandula? tartaricse, 124 Hare-lip, its origin, 31 Horny layer of the epidermis, 23 Human embryo, relation between size and age, 148 Incisive or intermaxillary bourgeons, origin of, etc., 29, 31 period of union with the maxillary bourgeons, 50 Incisive region, 40 Initial spheroid, of Guillot, 173 Intermaxillary bones, 30, 38 processes, 31 suture, 39 Intermediate membrane, of Henle, 12, 18 Internal cartilaginous arch, 35 epithelium of the enamel-organ of Kolliker, 22 Introduction, authors', 47 Lamina, epithelial, 62, 70, 105, 115, 137, 144 Laminated membrane of follicular wall, 106 Last molar, its origin, 144 INDEX. -I' Lateral buddings of primitive cord, • •-' Malleus, termination of Meckel's cartilage, 33 ossification of its cartilage . :'>i Malpighian stratum, 15, 17. 30, 84 Manimillated form of mcipienl dental bulb, ■'•> Mandibular processes, 82 Maxillary bourgeons, union with intermaxillary, ■>" rampart, 52 Meckel's cartilage, 27, 32, 50, 149 Membrana adamantina, of Raechkow, 22 Eboris, 91 praVurmativa of Rasehkow. 18. 88, 90. 101, 10(5 prsformativa of Huxley, 88, 90 propria, 12 Mesoblast, the origin of the dermis, 19 period at which developed, 25 Mucosa, 1-4 Mucous layer, 12 Mucous membrane, 9 Odontol .lasts, tissue in which they first appear. 101 Odonto>n.nir parj, or the generating part of the teeth, ol Odontomes, 159 . Oral epidermis, divisible into two lamina1, 19 Origin and formation of the dental follicle, 49 Origin and formation of the dental bulb and follicular wall, 93 Pars papillaris, or i r> j- .->- Papillary layer. f ' ' 10 ,- .,- Pars reticularis, reticulary layer. Id, lo. &a Pellucid layer. v^ Periplast ol Huxley. 22 Permanent follicles that Lave been preceded by temporary ones, 129 commencement of, 153 Phenomena that follow formation of follicle, etc., 115 Plateau of the prismatic cells. s7 Premaxillse, 40 Primitive bourgeon of the follicle, 65 Primitive papilla. 95 Primitive follicle after rupture of cord. 123 modifications in surrounding parts. 185 in relation to origin of secondary cord, 188 Primitive cord, prolongations of, 128 point from which secondary bourgeon starts, 140 Prismatic layer of cells, 28, 59, 82, 109 Processes, apophyses or bourgeons, 28 2 1 6 INDEX. " Proper" mucous membrane, 13, 14 Pulp of enamel- organ, stellate arrangement of, 80 Raschkow's theory of origin of follicle, 171 Reticulary layer, 13, 15, 25 Ruptured cord, 135 Scarf-skin, 17 Second molar, origin of, 144 Secondary bourgeon, its descent into dental groove, 134 in lower animals, 136 and point of origin, direction it takes, 140 Secondary cord, 139 development of, 153 separation of, 154, 155 Secondary follicle, 123, 141 Semilunar area, origin of dentine germs, 98 Skin, analogous to mucous membrane, 16 Stellate bodies, transformation of cells of the enamel-organ, 69, 77 Stratum corneum, 23 Malpighii, 12, 20 Malpighii prismatic layer derived from, 59 intermedium, 84, 153 Subcutanea, 15 Subdermal areolar tissue, 25 Subdermis, 15 Submucous tissue, 25 Submucosa, 13, 15 Superior maxillary processes, 31 Tartaric glands, 124 Tela mucosa, 13, 15 Temporary follicles, generally the source of the twenty an- terior permanent teeth, 137 The epithelial lamina and genesis of enamel-organ, 62 The mode of origin of follicles of permanent teeth, 127 Third molar, place of origin, 138, 145 Tongue, apophyses, etc., 28 Translator's introduction, 9 True epidermis, 17 Tubercles, bourgeons, processes, etc., 28 Upper jaw, its development, 50 Vessels of the bulb, 126 Visceral arch, 28 Wisdom tooth, its origin, 138, 144 — _ RK880 Legros L52 Copy 1 Origin and formation of the dental follicle. ft ->-] a^