O O TUTION NOIinillSNl“’NVINOSHiWS S3lbVHan LI B RAR I ES^SMITHSONIAN~INSTiTUTION'^NOIini!l r- 2: r- 2: DO ^ /i'i > Ft XI \^\ rn ^ rn CO _ CO _ vaan libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiruiiSNi nvinoshiiims saiavaan librari ~ CO Z CO z , rUTION NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHilWS SHIHVaail LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOlinili v-^ O ~ O Z _t Z -I vaan libraries smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshiiins saiavaan librar " /SiT^ § ,/ x-,*i I " .vCs I CO TUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHillNS SHiavaaH LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOlinili CO A -c I CO o z > W" 5 '* > * Z CO z CO *Z cO Vaail LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHIIWS S3iavaa ^ CO CO — CO CO TUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHIIINS S3iavaail LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOlinili Z r- z r- Z r- Z rn '' rn ^ m CO ' ± CO £ CO ^ vaan libraries smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi NvmosHims saiavaan librari rUTlON NOliniliSNI NVINOSHIIWS S3iavaai3 libraries smithsonian institution NOlinili U> 0/ ~:S-y — ■' ^VASVA^/ O ■■ Q ^ ‘ -I :z _ vaan libraries smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshiiiais sBiavaan librar [: ^ ^ H ^ ^ z r- ^ z z i?V4rX m ^ • m O v iV ^ ' t— ^ • ' ' ■ ^ f— ' r ' C/) _ c/5 £ c/5 ' _ ITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHIIWS SSiaVHan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITl c/5 z CO z: , CO 2: — v;Ns»»^>r‘> O Xi^ost5jiZ z ITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHlIkMS S3iaVaail LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITl — — ^ — — — o m ^ m pcjz ^ m X^i;^ CO ± \ Z ^ (/, iNOSHims saiavyan libraries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshiiins saiav ^ 5 ITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOlinillSNl'^NVINOSHlIWs'^Sa I B Va a CC5 = CO > I^LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITl r: CO :: « O 15^^ _ x^ociiS^ Q '''' Z X^OiiiS^ Q XO;v_dC>^ “ O 2 -J Z* _J 2 _| 2 N0SHimS_S3 iavaan_LIBRARI ES_SMITHS0N1AN_ institution NOIinillSNI_NVINOSHlllMS S3 I av o z o — i/y — (/) ± CO ITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHIIIMS S3iavaan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITL ^ Z » CO z CO > 2 X^os>5^ > 2 ' V^5v'- > \^^A^ 2 CO •'* Z CO Z CO Z CO NosHiiws S3 lava a 11 libraries smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi nvinoshiiws S3iav co_= CO — ,n - ■, (n - x,h:a^ 5 ■• 5 !f o ' z ITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOliniliSNI NVINOSHII/JS S3iavaai1 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITl z o z o CD Z o /fc"SO; THE PALAEONTOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION The Association was founded in 1957 to promote research in palaeontology and its allied sciences. COUNCIL 1987-1988 President: Dr. L. R. M. Cocks, Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD Vice-Presidents: Dr. D. E. G. Briggs, Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 IRJ Dr. L. B. Halstead, Department of Geology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AB Treasurer: Dr. M. Romano, Department of Geology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield SI 3JD Membership Treasurer: Dr. A. T. Thomas, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston, Birmingham B4 7ET Institutional Membership Treasurer: Dr. A. W. Owen, Department of Geology, The University, Dundee DDl 4HN Secretary: Dr. P. W. Skelton, Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA Circular Reporter: Dr. D. J. Siveter, Department of Geology, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX Marketing Manager: Dr. V. P. Wright, Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 IRJ Public Relations Officer: Dr. M. J. Benton, Department of Geology, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT5 6FB Editors Dr. M. J. Benton, Department of Geology, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT5 6FB Dr. P. R. Crowther, City of Bristol Museum and Art Gallery, Bristol BS8 IRL Dr. D. Edwards, Department of Plant Science, University College, Cardiff CFl IXL Dr. T. J. Palmer, Department of Geology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 2AX Dr. C. R. C. Paul, Department of Geology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX Dr. P. A. Selden, Department of Extra-Mural Studies, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL Other Members Dr. H. A. Armstrong, Newcastle upon Tyne Dr. G. B. Curry, Glasgow Dr. M. E. Collinson, London Professor B. M. Funnell, Norwich Dr. J. A. Crame, Cambridge Dr. P. D. Taylor, London Overseas Representatives Australia: Professor B. D. Webby, Department of Geology, The University, Sydney, N.S.W., 2006 Canada: Dr. B. S. Norford, Institute of Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology, 3303-33rd Street NW., Calgary, Alberta Japan : Dr. I. Hayami. University Museum, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo New Zealand: Dr. G. R. Stevens, New Zealand Geological Survey, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt U.S.A.: Dr. R. J. Cuffey, Department of Geology, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania 16802 Professor A. J. Rowell, Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 Professor N. M. Savage, Department of Geology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403 South America: Dr. O. A. Reig, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas 108. Venezuela MEMBERSHIP Membership is open to individuals and institutions on payment of the appropriate annual subscription. Rates for 1987 are: Institutional membership £50 00 (U.S. $79) Ordinary membership £21 00 (U.S. $38) Student membership . £1 1 50 (U.S. $20) Retired membership £10 50 (U.S. $19) There is no admission fee. Correspondence concerned with Institutional Membership should be addressed to Dr. A. W. Owen, Department of Geology, The L>niversily, Dundee DDl 4H1N. Student members are persons receiving full-time instruction at educational institutions recognized by the Council. On first applying for membership, an application form should be obtained from the Membership Treasurer, Dr. A. T. Thomas, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET. Subscriptions cover one calendar year and are due each January; they should be sent to the Membership Treasurer, All members who join for 1987 will receive Palaeontology. Volume 30, Parts 1-4. Back numbers still in print may be ordered from Marston Book Services, P.O. Box 87, Oxford 0X4 ILB, England. Cover: Pedicle valve of the brachiopod Strophonella euglypha (Dalman, 1828) from the Wenlock Limestone of Dudley, West Midlands; x 2. Photography by Harry Taylor of the British Museum (Natural History) Photographic Studio. One of the specimens illustrated in the Atlas of Invertebrate Macrofossils published by the Association. PROTOCYSTITES MENEVENSIS — A STEM-GROUP CHORDATE (CORNUTA) FROM THE MIDDLE CAMBRIAN OF SOUTH WALES by R. P. S. JEFFERIES, M. LEWIS (md S. K. DONOVAN Abstract. Protocvstiles menevensis Hicks, 1872, from the Hypagnostus pcirvifrons Zone of the Middle Cam- brian, near St David’s, Dyfed, South Wales, is reconstructed and redescribed. It proves to be a cornute, and therefore a stem-group chordate, representing a plesion intermediate between that of Ceratocystis peineri (the most primitive known chordate) and that of Nevadaecystis aniericana. For purposes of reconstruction, tectonic distortion of the fossils was corrected by means of a computer program. The positions of oesophagus, stomach, and intestine are suggested in P. menevensis on the basis of skeletal evidence. The locomotory cycle of the animal, which probably crept rearwards over the sea floor pulled by its tail, is deduced. It is argued that, on a practical definition, every plesion is fundamentally paraphyletic. The term ‘more crownward’ is used to signify that a plesion is more closely related to the relevant crown group than is some other plesion. The term ‘nodal group’ is proposed for all those members of a group which possessed all the autapomorphies of the crown group but none of the autapomorphies of any of the subgroups of the crown group. A comparison between stem chordates and the echinoderms shows that echinoderm ‘dorsal’ is homologous with chordate ventral and vice versa, so in echinoderms the use of the terms ‘dorsal’ and ‘ventral’ should be abandoned. The aims of this paper are to redescribe Protocystites menevensis Hicks, 1872, from the Middle Cambrian near St David’s, Dyfed, Wales; to locate it stratigraphically; to reconstruct its skeletal anatomy, soft parts, and functional morphology; and to determine its systematic position. The species proves to be a stem-group chordate of the group Cornuta. It is the second most primitive cornute known and, at present, the oldest chordate known from Britain. Other interpretations regard P. menevensis, and all other cornutes, as echinoderms, e.g. Ubaghs (1967, 1981) and Philip (1979). One of us has argued elsewhere why these various views are mistaken and the arguments will not be repeated here (see Jefferies 198 k/, h, 1986). The present study of P. menevensis began in 1981 when the two junior authors independently examined the lectotype A. 1021 in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge, and E432 in the British Museum (Natural History). They immediately recognized them as belonging to a species of cornute and several small expeditions to Porth-y-rhaw in 1982 to 1984 yielded much more material. The senior author devoted most of 1984 to reconstructing the animal in detail. The stratigraphical part of this paper results from the work of M. Lewis. PHYLOGENETIC METHODOLOGY The terms ‘stem group’ and ‘crown group’ as applied in this paper still require explanation (although their use seems to be spreading: Jefferies 1979; Patterson 1981; Smith 1984a; Paul and Smith 1984; Thulborn 1984). Given two sister groups (1 and 2) with still extant members (text-fig. 1), there are two obvious ways of delimiting both groups when extinct forms are taken into account. The narrower delimitation of group 2, for example, would include the latest common ancestor of all the living members, plus all its descendants, whether living or dead. This delimitation can be called the crown group as proposed in Jefferies (1979)— a term that corresponds to the *group of Hennig jPalaeontology, Vol. 30, Part 3, 1987, pp. 429-484, pis. 54-60.| © The Palaeontological Association 430 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 (1969, 1981). The wider delimitation of group 2 would include all descendants of the latest common ancestor of groups 1 and 2 except members of group 1. This delimitation can be called the total group (‘Gesamtgruppe’ of Hennig). Now, if the crown group of 2 is subtracted from the total group of 2, a paraphyletic ancestral grouping remains which can be called the stem group of 2. Within this stem group, it is theoretically important to distinguish the stem lineage of 2 (Ax, in press; ‘Stammlinie’ of Ax 1984)— this, for us, is the lineal sequence of ancestors and descendants which led from the latest common ancestor of [1 +2] up to, but not including, the first member of crown group 2, which latter was the latest common ancestor of all living members of 2. (Our usage differs slightly from that of Ax, who includes the latest common ancestor of the living forms in the stem lineage as he defines it.) However, the stem group does not include the stem lineage alone: it also contains the ‘side branches’— all descendants of the stem lineage which do not belong to the TEXT-FIG. 1. Stem group, crown group, and stem lineage. Crown groups 1 and 2 are sister groups with some members still living. Present day I I n’rn 1 1 I 1 Crown group Crown group 2 Stem group 2 Stem lineage 2 crown group. Within the stem group, it is possible to conceive of different degrees of relationship to the crown group, and Patterson and Rosen (1977, p. 165) proposed the term ‘plesion’ for ‘fossil groups of species sequenced in a classification according to the convention that each such group is the plesiomorph sister-group of all those, living and fossil, that succeed it . . .’. By thus arranging plesions within the stem group in order of increasing relationship with the crown group, it is possible to reconstruct the sequence of origin of the autapomorphies of the crown group as these evolved within the stem lineage. Patterson and Rosen implied, by using the term ‘sister-group’ in the definition quoted, that plesions are monophyletic. We should like to redefine the word ‘plesion’, however, to accord more with practical realities, as follows: a plesion includes all, and only, those members of a stem group which, so far as can be discerned, are equally closely related to the crown group. As discussed below, a plesion so defined, if fully known, is necessarily paraphyletic. JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 431 TEXT-FIG. 2. The paraphyletic nature of plesions and the position of the nodal group, a, the phytogeny of stem group 2 as it actually happened, h, cladograms of plesions 1, 2, and 3 so far as reconstructable. The term ‘crownward’ has been proposed by Jeflferies (1986, p. 13) to mean ‘more closely related to the crown group’. Thus, within the stem group of group 2, plesion 3 (of text-fig. 2) is crownward of plesion 2. It is less ambiguous than ‘higher’, which may indicate stratigraphy, increase in complexity in any direction, or even moral approval; it is also clearer than ‘more advanced’ since it implies advance towards the crown group along the stem lineage only; and it is better than ‘later’ which ought to refer only to time. As opposite to crownward, we use ‘less crownward’ to signify position, or ‘anti-crownward’ to indicate direction. To split a stem group into plesions we usually search for a feature shared with the crown group by some members of the stem group, but not by others. However, the feature sought need not be shared with all members of the crown group, since some may secondarily have lost it. And, indeed, a feature shared with more crownward plesions may be used, even when it was later lost within the stem lineage and is therefore primitively absent in the crown group itself. Thus the cornute Nevadaecystis americana (Ubaghs, 1963) possesses a strut, in common with more crownward plesions of the chordate stem group such as those of Cothwnocystis etizae Bather, 1913 and Galliaecystis lignieresi Ubaghs, 1969 (text-fig. 26), but unlike less crownward plesions such as those of P. menevensis and Ceratocystis penieri Jaeckel, 1900. The strut is a legitimate reason for putting the plesion of N. americana more crownward than that of P. menevensis. The strut is absent, however, from all mitrates, which are primitive members of the chordate crown group, and is 432 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 secondarily incomplete in the crownmost members of the chordate stem group, such as the cornute Reticulocarpos hamisi Jefferies and Prokop, 1972. The plesion concept has some difficulties. When a palaeontologist begins to divide a stem group into plesions, each plesion will probably be monospecific, and therefore monophyletic as regards its only known constituent, and this monophyly accords with Patterson’s and Rosen’s concept of the term plesion. As study proceeds, however, this early false clarity will be lost, because more than one species will come to be assigned to each plesion, and often these species will not share synapomorphies with each other such as would show them to form, on their own, a monophyletic group. Indeed, the stem group can be divided into plesions only to the extent which changes in the stem lineage will allow. The smallest theoretically recognizable segment of a stem lineage will be the sequence of ancestors and descendants lying between one evolutionary novelty and the next more crownward one evolved in the stem lineage, e.g. the segment of the stem lineage within plesion 1, between novelties 1 and 2 in text-fig. 2. All side branches from this segment, together with the segment itself, will necessarily be members of the same plesion, in so far as this term is usable in practice. If, therefore, all members of such a plesion (all its constituent individuals) had come to be known, the plesion would include part of the stem lineage as well as any side branches. And this segment of the stem lineage would be ancestral to forms which did not belong to the plesion, i.e. to more crownward plesions and to the crown group itself. But such a fully known plesion would be paraphyletic by Hennig’s definition of paraphyly since, being in part ancestral to non-members, it would have no ancestor common to it alone (Hennig 1966, p. 146). This would remain true, even if the relevant part of the stem lineage was only a single generation. As knowledge advances, therefore, a plesion will change from being monophyletic as regards its single known member species, to being possibly paraphyletic as regards all its known members. On the other hand, as soon as a formerly recognized plesion can be shown to be paraphyletic by demonstrating that an evolutionary novelty evolved within it in the stem lineage, then it will be split into two plesions, one of which will be more crownward than the other. The paradox is therefore reached that a plesion is by its nature paraphyletic, but as soon as it can be shown to be so in the particular case, it splits. Also it is possible to show that a particular fossil is not a member of the stem lineage if it possesses features which never existed in that lineage. But it is never, or almost never, possible to show that a fossil a member of the stem lineage. We use the term ‘intermediate category’ (Hennig’s ‘Zwischenkategorie’) for an overtly para- phyletic grouping of two or more adjacent plesions within a stem group. Such provable paraphyletic groupings may sometimes be convenient to recognize. An example is the group Cornuta for the crownward part of the chordate stem group. (It is still unknown what fossils should be placed less crownward than the cornutes in the chordate stem group.) We propose the term ‘nodal group’ for all those members of a monophyletic group which possess all the autapomorphies of the crown group, but are primarily lacking any of the autapomorphies of any of the subgroups of the crown group. Thus, with reference to group 2 in text-fig. 2, the nodal group will show novelty 4 (the last one evolved in the stem lineage of group 2) but will lack novelties 5 and 6 (the first ones evolved in the respective stem lineages of the major subgroups of 2, i.e. 2a and 2b). Thus the nodal group will include the latest common ancestor of the extant members of group 2, and this gives it particular importance, but it will also contain the most crownward parts of the stem group of 2 and the least crownward parts of the stem groups of subgroups 2a and 2b. The word ‘calcichordate’ was proposed by one of us (Jefferies 1967) for any chordate with a calcite skeleton of echinoderm type, and in particular for the cornutes and the mitrates. On these definitions, P. menevensis is a calcichordate. However, in the light of Hennig’s work (1969, 1981) the ‘Calcichordata’ form an ‘invalid stem group’ since the cornutes are stem-group chordates while the mitrates are primitive crown-group chordates (Jefferies 1 979, 1 986). Consequently, the word ‘calci- chordate’ is best abandoned or, at most, used informally. The word ‘Stylophora’ (Gill and Caster 1960) is coextensive in meaning with Calcichordata. It should be abandoned for the same reasons, and also because the workers who use it mistakenly regard the cornutes and mitrates as echinoderms and it wrongly implies that the cornute stylocone is homologous with the mitrate styloid. JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 433 METHODS OF STUDY P. menevensis was reconstructed by one of us (R.P.S.J.) on a drawing board, several projections being plotted simultaneously as with previous such studies (e.g. Jefferies 1968, 1969). The specimens were examined by means of latex casts to reconstruct the skeleton, and by direct observation of internal moulds to reconstruct the soft parts. Sometimes pyrite and limonite were removed from the fossils by soaking them overnight in 10% thioglycollic acid; this cleaning allowed much better latex casts to be made. Correction of distortion Tectonic distortion made great difficulties. These were partly overcome by means of a computer-graphical method based on suggestions by Appleby and Jones (1976) and Ramsay (1967). The bedding planes of the shale in which the specimens occur are crossed by stretching lineations which give the rock a slight graininess like that of wood. All these lineations run parallel to tight parallel folds in the thinner shelled trilobites and represent the long axis (.v-axis) of the strain ellipse for the bedding plane; the direction at right angles to them (j^-axis) is the direction of greatest compression in the bedding plane. The original outline of a plate would therefore correspond to the observed outline expanded by some definite factor along the v’-axis, perpendicular to the lineations. L/yr 1.0- 0.9- 0.8- 0.7- 0.6- - 0.5- 0.4- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 TEXT-FIG. 3. Correction of distortion on the basis of two specimens of P. menevensis Hicks plate g (see text-fig. 10) compressed approximately perpen- dicular to each other. The .v-axis is the presumed major axis of the strain ellipse. Specimen a, BM(NH) E62952; specimen h, BM(NH) E62930; proportionate increase of unit length along the v-axis, relative to the .v-axis (further expla- nation in text). 434 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 1.60 1.90 TEXT-FIG. 4. Correction of distortion of a hind-tail ossicle of P. menevensis Hicks, BM(NH) E432. The numbers show (see text). A computer program was devised by Mr A. J. Paterson of the Biometrics Section, British Museum (Natural History), to modify the observed outlines in the manner required. To use this program, camera-lucida drawings of the specimen were placed on a digitizer with the .v-axis (assumed to be parallel to the stretching lineations) arranged parallel to the .\-axis of the digitizer. The shape in the drawing was transformed into x-y coordinates by tracing the outline with the cross-wires on the ‘puck’ (follower) of the digitizer. The r coordinates were then multiplied by a factor n, while the corresponding .v coordinates were multiplied by \jn. The results of these multiplications were displayed on a visual display unit and simultaneously drawn, as needed, on a plotter. It was also possible to multiply both sets of coordinates by a uniform factor M so that the visual output was magnified to a convenient size. The proportionate increase of the v coordinate relative to the .v coordinate was (since n^( I//?) = iP). To decide the appropriate value of and therefore «, was not easy. With initially symmetrical structures, such as the obliquely distorted heads or tails of trilobites or the tail ossicles of Protocystites, the presumed’ correct value restored the initial symmetry. With asymmetrical structures, such as the head plates of Protocystites, it was necessary to find two specimens of the same plate compressed in different directions, preferably at right angles. The appropriate value of would then be the one that gave the same shape to the two specimens. In fact, this ideal agreement was never achieved, and it was therefore necessary to use some index of shape, such as the ratio of the length of two chosen lines on the plates or the angle of some prominent corner. The appropriate value of tP was then the one that gave identical values for the index. When comparing two specimens of corresponding plates compressed in different directions, a series of computer plots was made for both plates with tP increasing at increments of 0 05 from 105 to 1-70. Graphs were then drawn of iP against the measured value for the chosen index for both plates. The appropriate value of )P was that at which the indexes of both plates were equal, i.e. where the lines for the two plates crossed each other on the graph. At this value, the computer plot was presumed to show the original shape of the plate. The deduced values for iP are not uniform. Three head plates (e, g, and k on text-fig. 10) gave values of close to 1-20 (text-fig. 3). The same value was found to hold for an isolated hind-tail ossicle (text-fig. 4) and for the hind-tail ossicles of the lectotype (designated below). On the other hand, two specimens of the left 1.00 1.45 1-60 1.90 b TEXT-FIG. 5. Correction of distortion for two trilobite cephalons. a, Ptychagnostus. b, Eodiscus. The num- bers show (see text). X axis JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 435 process (the process on plate 1), which was thin and is sometimes visibly crumpled, required a higher value of at about 1-60. The same value was required to restore symmetry to the trilobite Eoclisciis (text-hg. 5h) whereas a specimen of the cephalon of Ptycliagnostus (text-hg. 5a) became symmetrical at about iP = 115. The highest values of iP, as shown by the trilobite Eodiscus, probably approach the distortion of the matrix itself, whereas the lower values usually shown by the skeleton of Protocystites meneveusis suggest that stereom calcite or its pyritic replacement was, because of its strength, less distorted than the surround- ing rock. Indeed many specimens of P. menevensis seem to have responded to tectonic pressure by the plates sliding over or against each other, as well as by changing their outline. Sometimes adjacent tail ossicles have been pushed against each other, causing very high local pressures and non-homogeneous distortion, as testified by highly asymmetrical outlines. It is impossible to make proper allowance for these variations. The reconstructions are therefore based on computer plots with iP= 1-20 (n = I 095) which seems to be correct for the tougher parts of the head and tail skeleton of P. menevensis (cf. text-fig. 6). The results are probably better than those that would be obtained using uncorrected drawings of the specimens. Nevertheless, there is uncertainty about the shapes of the plates and the relative sizes of different parts of the animal, and this must be remembered in considering the reconstructions. n z 1.00 n :1.20 TEXT-FIG. 6. Protocystites menevensis Hicks; uncorrectcd and corrected drawings of BM(NH) E62963 (ventral aspect). The numbers show iP (see text). Distortion perpendicular to the bedding planes is an even bigger problem than distortion in the plane of bedding. Thin parts of the skeleton, which originally stood almost vertical, and thus perpendicular to the bedding plane, have sometimes been squashed flat on to the bedding plane. This is particularly true of the posterior wall of the head in plates f, g, j, and k (see text-fig. lO). To obtain some idea of the original shape of these plates, replicas based on computer plots with iP = I -20 were cut in aluminium sheet and bent to the likely original shape in three dimensions. Once again, the results are uncertain, so that the vertical dimension of the reconstructions is not reliable. Tectonic distortion can thus be partly, but not totally, corrected; better reconstructions will require undis- torted material (which may never be found). It is remarkable that tectonic distortion has not destroyed the histology of the plates, for the superficial features of different types of stereom can readily be recognized. (The three-dimensional structure of the stereom is not usually deducible.) 436 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY Superphylum deuterostomia Grobben, 1908 Subsuperphylum dexiothetica Jeflferies, 1979 Phylum CHORDATA Bateson, 1886 [Stem group of the Chordata] Intermediate category cornuta Jaekel, 1901 Plesion of Protocystites menevensis herein Genus protocystites Hicks, 1872 Type species. P. menevensis Hicks, 1872, by monotypy. Systematic position. The above statement of systematic position is unorthodox. We deliberately have not placed P. menevensis in a family because it is at present alone in its plesion. Any family which included it, therefore, would either be: 1, coextensive with the species P. menevensis and therefore redundant; or 2, it would include one or more of the adjacent plesions of the chordate stem group— it would thus be overtly paraphyletic and (unlike the overtly paraphyletic grouping Cornuta, for example) would, in our opinion, never be a useful grouping in practice. Another unorthodoxy is that the intermediate category Cornuta is here given no conventional Linnaean rank. This omission is likewise deliberate and is based on the fact that nobody has yet explained how Linnaean rank can objectively be assigned, particularly to paraphyletic groupings of fossils (Ax, 1984, Ch. K; Ax, in press). Those ranks which are assigned above are either hallowed, though not validated, by long usage (superphylum, phylum) or else are obtained by interpolation (subsuperphylum). Protocystites menevensis Hicks, 1872 Plates 54-60; text-figs. 6, 10, 15-19, 23-25 1866 Protocystites Salter in Hicks and Salter, p. 285 {nom. mid.). 1871 Protocystites menevensis Hicks in Harkness and Hicks, p. 396 {nom. mid.). 1872 Protocystites menevensis Hicks, pi. 5, fig. 19; p. 180 (lower illustration only). 1873 Protocystites menevensis Hicks; Salter, p. 3. 1887 Protocystites meneviensis Hicks; Barrande, p. 10. 1900 Protocystis Hicks; Bather, p. 48. 1943 Protocystites meneviensis Hicks; Bassler and Moody, p. 1 84. 1967 Protocystites Hicks; Ubaghs, p. S493. 1967 Protocystites meneviensis Hicks; Paul in Jefferies et at., p. 567. 1979 Protocystites meneviensis Hicks; Paul, p. 453. Comments on synonymy. The only previous figure and description of Protocystites menevensis was that of Hicks (1872). His illustration shows two specimens which can be identified with specimens A. 1021 and A. 1022 now held in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge. Of these, A. 1022 is the operculum of a hyolithid, whereas A. 1021 is a fairly good specimen of the species described in this paper and is here designated as lectotype (text-figs. 17 and 18; PI. 56, figs. 1-3; PI. 57, figs. 1 and 2). Hicks’s figure is very poor and the species is not recognizable from it. Subsequent references to the species or genus, therefore, add nothing to knowledge and are of purely bibliographic interest. The name Protocystites must not be confused with Proteocystites Barrande, 1887 which is a diplorite cystoid (see e.g. Kesling 1967, p. S248) and an echinoderm. Material, horizon, and locality. The material examined is as follows; (a) Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge: A. 1021 (here chosen as lectotype) ex Hicks Collection, locality Porth- y-rhaw near St David’s, Dyfed, horizon Menevian. Figured by Hicks (1872, pi. 5, fig. 19, lower figured specimen only) (text-figs. 17 and 18; PI. 56, figs. 1-3; PI. 57, figs. 1 and 2). (h) British Museum (Natural History), London; i, old material, E432 ex Hicks Collection, locality St David’s, horizon Menevian (text-fig. 19; PI. 58, fig. 1); ii, new material, E62912-E62921, E62923-E62925, all from loc. 1, Porth-y-rhaw (text-figs. 7 and 8), horizon middle part of Hypagnostus parvifrons Zone, Middle Menevian; iii, also new material, E62926-E62934, E62937-E62939, E62942-E62945, E62950, E62952, E62955- E62966, E62968-E62981, E63006-E63056, all from loc. 2, Porth-y-rhaw (text-fig. 7), horizon nearly or exactly the same as for loc. 1 . JEFFERIES. LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 437 TEXT-FIG. 7. Geology and topography of Porth-y-rhaw, Dyfed, Wales. I and 2 arc the localities that produced the new material of Protocystites menevensis Hicks. X and Y are respectively the lower and upper ends of the composite profile shown in text-fig. 8. 438 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 (c) National Museum of Wales, Cardiff: NMW. 80. 34G. 948-958, all from loc. 1, Porth-y-rhaw, same horizon as BM(NH) material from that locality. Most of the material consists of dissociated plates. All of it is tectonically distorted. Articulated specimens include SM A. 1021 (lectotype) and BM(NH) E432, E62950, E62952, E62963 (the most instructive specimen; text-figs. 6, 15, f 6; PI. 54, figs, f -3; PI. 55, figs. 1 and 2), E62977, E62979. Porth-y-rhaw, from which all the recently found material came (our Iocs. 1 and 2; text-figs. 7 and 8) (as also did one, or perhaps both, of the two nineteenth-century specimens), is a small inlet situated on the coast of Dyfed, Wales, about 3-6 km east-south-east of the cathedral of St David’s and about 1-5 km west of Solva Harbour (text-fig. 7). The east side of Porth-y-rhaw (including our loc. 1 ) is the type section (text-fig. 8) of the Menevian Group of Hicks and Salter (1866). It was on this eastern side that Salter discovered Paracloxides davidis Salter, 1863 and its associated fauna in 1862, by chance, as a result of misnavigation. Text-hg. 9 shows the now accepted stratigraphical divisions for the Middle Cambrian near St David’s. Loc. 1 is on the eastern cliff section, Porth-y-rhaw (NGR SM 78596 24235), middle part of H. parvifrons Zone, at shore level, stratigraphically c. 22-24 m below the basal contact of two, almost vertical, 4 m thick sills and approximately 10 12 m stratigraphically below the local base of the Ptychagnostus pimctiiosus Zone (text-figs. 7 and 8). The nature and distribution of the fauna is shown in text-fig. 8. Loc. 2 (text-fig. 7) is on the western cliff section, also in the H. parvifrons Zone at or near the same horizon as loc. 1, just above the cliff top near the southern end of Porth-y-rhaw (NGR SM 78492 24252). Here the beds are less cleaved and more suitably weathered for yielding fossils than at loc. 1 . In addition to Protocyslites menevensis, the fauna here comprises the trilobites Ptychagnostus ciceroides (Matthew, 1896), P. davidis (Hicks, 1872), P. punctiiosus affinis (Brogger, 1878), P. pimctiiosus s.l. (Angelin, 1851), Cotalagnostus lens (Grdnwall, 1902), Phalacroma hibullatum (Barrande, 1846), Peronopsis scutalis scutalis (Hicks, 1872), P. falla.x depressa Westergard, 1946, Phalagnostus cC. nudus {Bey rich, 1845), Eodiscus punctatus punctatus (Saher, 1864), Agraulos longicephalus (Hicks, 1872), Jincella applanata (Hicks, 1872), Hartshillina spinata (Illing, 1916), Clarella salteri (Hicks in Salter, 1865), Acontheiis n. sp. aff. A. inarmatus Hutchinson, 1962, and a pagetiid (new genus); and the non-trilobite fossils Linnarssonia sagittalis (Davidson, 1871), Lingidella sp., Hyolithes corrugatus (Salter, 1864), Stenotheca cornucopia Hicks, 1872, Protospongia fenestrata Salter, 1864, and Ctenocystis sp. The record of Ctenocystis sp. is of interest as being the only known occurrence of the genus in Britain. In the western cliff section, where loc. 2 is situated, the stratigraphically overlying punctuosus Zone seems to be unrepresented and the base of the parvifrons Zone could not be located exactly. However, evidence of the underlying Tomagnostus fissus- Ptychagnostus ataviis Zone was found 40 m stratigraphically below loc. 2. As already stated, some 12 m of the parvifrons Zone exists in the eastern cliff section above the horizon of loc. 1 (text-fig. 8). If the horizons of Iocs. 1 and 2 are identical, therefore, the greatest possible thickness of the parvifrons Zone at Porth-y-rhaw is 12-1-40 = c. 52 m. In biostratigraphic terms, ‘Menevian’ (text-fig. 9) conventionally refers to the traditional zones of Paradox- ides hicksii and P. davidis and possibly other zones. References covering the most important faunas in the Menevian Group include Salter (1863, 1864, 1865), Salter and Hicks (1867, 1869), Hicks in Harkness and Hicks (1871), and Hicks and Jones (1872). Most of the trilobites were redescribed by Lake (1906-1946) and they indicate the presence of ihc fissus, parvifrons, and punctuosus zones of Scandinavian terminology. The term ‘Lower Menevian’ is equivalent to the hicksii Zone of authors, which can be equated approximately with the fissus-atavus Zone of Sweden. P. hicksii is here considered a probable senior subjective synonym of TEXT-FIG. 8. Stratigraphic log of the beds exposed on the foreshore on the eastern side of Porth-y-rhaw, between points X and Y of text-fig. 7, and a complete list of the fossils found in that section. The profile is a composite, built up from three separate sections as shown in text-fig. 7. Locality I is at 22-24 m below the lower dolerite sill and is just above mean high-water mark. Abbreviations: M, mud; S, silt; LS, fine sand; MS, medium sand; CS, coarse sand; MHW, mean high water; MLW, mean low water; 1, Hyolithes sp.; 2, Ptychagnostus punctuosus affinis', 3, Protocystites menevensis', 4, pagetiid gen. et sp. nov.; 5, Linnarssonia sagittalis', 6, centropleurine fragments; 7, Meneviella sp. indet.; 8, Ptychagnostus punctuosus s.l.; 9, Acontheus sp. nov.; 10, P. davidis', 11,//. corrugatus', 12, Jincella applanata', 13, Peronopsis fallax depressa', 14, Protospongia sp.; 15, conocoryphid gen. et sp. indet.; 16, Peronopsis sp.; 17, M. cf. vemdosci', 18, Heperditkf hicksi', 19, P. scutalis scutalis", 20, Eodiscus punctatus punctatus', 21, Cotalagnostus lens (s.l.); 22, Ptychagnostus ciceroides', 23, M. venuloscr, 24, Clarella sp.; 25, P. punctuosus punctuosus', 26, Anopolenus henrici', 27, Peronopsis ex gr. fallax', 28, Pleuroctenium cf. hifurcatum', 29, Holocephalina cf. primordialis', 30, Phalagnostus cf. nudus', 31, Solenopleurina variolaris', 32, Pseudoperonopsis sp.; 33, Paracloxides davidis. ' 0 1 2- 3- 4- V) (b 5' |e- 7- 8- 9- 1 0- 1 1- 1 2- 13- 14- 1 5- 1 6- 1 7- 18- 19- 20- 2 1- 22- 2 3- 2 4- 2 5- 26- 2 7- 28- 2 9- JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 439 I I I I 1 \ \ \ ^ / - s / / / \ / / V -s ^ / 33 20“=.' 25 32 2223 • 262728293031 ' Tentative base of P. punctuosus Zone 1516 17’.®, g 10 1.1 ■MHW I -i-r»-|i^-|-i:i MLW M S MS FS CS 440 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TEXT-FIG. 9. Stratigraphical subdivisions of the Middle Cambrian of St David’s (mo- dified after Cowie et al. 1972). The zones of Paradoxides hicksii and P. davidis are tra- ditional for the South Welsh area; those shown to their right are the equivalent zones of the Scandinavian succession. The traditional zones are shown here with their traditional extent, although P. davidis at Porth-y-rhaw is in fact unknown outside the Ptychagnostus punctiiosus Zone. P. aurora Salter in Salter and Hicks (1869), and its range is extended downwards to the base of the Upper Solva Beds. The Lower Menevian Beds, estimated by Hicks (1881, p. 299) to be 300 ft (91 m) thick, consist of light-grey and dark-grey laminated mudstones which suffered soft sediment deformation in the lower part. Towards the top of the division are some greenish mudstone units, lithologically similar to the Upper Caered Mudstones (Nicholas 1916) of St Tudwal’s Peninsula, North Wales. The Middle Menevian Beds were estimated by Hicks (1881, p. 299) and by Stead and Williams (1971, p. 181) to be 350 ft (107 m) thick, although a precise boundary between these and the Lower Menevian Beds was not defined by these authors. The Middle Menevian Beds are darker and more uniform in colour than the Lower Menevian Beds and consist of cleaved pyritic mudstones with occasional thin, sometimes lenticular, sandy horizons and several thin ( < 10 cm) pale beds which, according to Nicholas (1916, p. 99) are composed of ashy material. Certain beds contain numerous small flattened phosphatic nodules, and these and the Lower Menevian strata appear to have been deposited in a euxinic environment (Rushton 1974, p. 90). In biostratigraphic terms ‘Middle Menevian’ is equivalent to the davidis Zone of certain authors, which corre- sponds approximately to the parvifrons and punctuosus zones of Scandinavian nomenclature (text-fig. 9). The species P. davidis, however, seems at Porth-y-rhaw to be confined to the punctuosus Zone. The Upper Menevian Beds at Porth-y-rhaw abruptly succeed the Middle Menevian beds and comprise coarse, dark-grey sandstones with shaly interbeds. These sandstones, exposed at the tip of the eastern headland of Porth-y-rhaw (text-fig. 7), are massive. They form beds up to 1 m thick at the base of the unit and seem to mark the initiation of deposition from current-agitated water or from turbidity currents. This style of depo- sition continued into "Lingula Flags’ times (Rushton 1974, p. 90). The Upper Menevian Beds of Porth-y-rhaw were said to be 100 ft (30 m) thick by Hicks (1881, p. 299) and Stead and Williams (1971, p. 81) but these authors did not define an upper limit. The sandstones contain " BiUingsella' liicksi (Davidson) and other brachiopods and are commonly referred to as 'Orthis' hicksi Beds. JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 441 Hicks (1892, p. 22) collected Paradoxides and a new species oi "Conocoryphe from them. These identifications suggest that the Upper Menevian of this locality may partly correspond to the P . forchhammeri ‘Stage’ of the Scandinavian sequence. Stead and Williams (1971, p. 188) believed that the junction between Middle and Upper Menevian beds was conformable. However, Taylor and Rushton (1972, p. 9) suggested a widespread non-sequence at this level in England, Wales, and south-eastern Newfoundland caused by a regression during the time of the Solenopleitra brachymetopa Zone. As to correlation, the beds of the parvifrons Zone are correlated with: the upper part of the Nant-pig Mudstones of St Tudwal’s Peninsula, North Wales (Rushton 1974, p. 72; after Nicholas 1916); Illing’s (1916) horizons F1-F3, representing the parvifrons Zone in the Abbey Shales of Warwickshire (Rushton 1979, p. 43); beds in the lower part of the Clogau Formation in the Harlech Dome, North Wales (Allen et al. 1981, p. 303); the lower part of the davidis Zone in the Manuels River Formation, south-eastern Newfoundland (Hutchinson 1962); and the parvifrons Zone of Scandinavia (summarized by Martinsson 1974). Thomas et al. (1984, p. 888) discussed the distribution of the various trilobite species in these rocks. The lithostratigraphical terminology used for the rocks of Porth-y-rhaw in this paper is in need of revision, but it is not appropriate to make this revision here. Thus the total stratigraphical range of Protocystites menevensis is not known, although all of the abundant new material comes from the middle part of the parvifrons Zone of the Middle Menevian. The horizon of the lectotype cannot be ascertained exactly, beyond the fact that it came from the Menevian of Porth-y-rhaw. Harkness and Hicks (1871, p. 396) recorded the species from both Lower and Middle Menevian Beds but this does not tally with our experience. Preservation and conditions of deposition. The plates of P. menevensis and Ctenocystis have been completely replaced by pyrite (often converted to limonite), or are represented by air-filled holes. No trace of calcite remains. The superficial histological detail is well preserved so that it is possible to recognize the surface features of different types of stereom. On the other hand, all the plates have been distorted tectonically and are often squashed on to the bedding planes. On the sea-floor, the black shale matrix was probably a stinking black mud. However, there is abundant benthos which indicates that the bottom water was usually oxygenated. Conditions may have resembled those of the German Lower Devonian Hunsriickschiefer, which are similarly black with abundant pyritized benthic fossils. Seilacher and Hemleben (1966) have argued, on the basis mainly of trace fossils, that the Hunsriick- schiefer were normally laid down in oxygenated bottom water, but that sometimes the bottom water lost its oxygen, asphyxiating the benthos. The same may have been true of the sea in which P. menevensis lived. As we show later, the species is adapted to staying up on extremely soft mud. Anatomical description Introduction. In describing the anatomy of P. menevensis we frequently refer, in passing, to related species, since without comparison morphological features have little significance. The particular species compared are: Ceratocystis perneri Saekd from the Middle Cambrian of Bohemia, Czechoslovakia (text-fig. 1 1 ); Nevcidaecystis americana (Ubaghs) from the Upper Cambrian of Nevada (text-fig. 12); Cothurnocysiis elizae Bather from the Upper Ordovician of Scotland (text-fig. 14); and 'C.' fellinensis Ubaghs, 1969 from the Lower Ordovician of the South of France (text-fig. 13). To anticipate the arguments given below under ‘Systematic Position’, Ceratocystis perneri is less crownward (less closely related to the chordate crown group) than P. menevensis, and in many respects shows the most primitive condition among known cornutes; N. americana is more crownward than P. menevensis', 'Cothurnocystis' fellinensis is more crownward than N. americana', and C. elizae is more crownward than ‘C.’ fellinensis (text-fig. 26). These conclusions are mentioned early so that the anatomical description, which is comparative, will be easier to understand. It is unfortunate that N. americana is known only from one specimen and that the floor of the head is not visible from beneath, though partly visible from above. As regards plate notation, one of us used to employ an objective system (Jefferies 1968) in which marginal plates were numbered from the anterior end of the tail and were given suffixes for left and right, dorsal and ventral (e.g. Mild was the first left dorsal marginal plate). This system was explicitly intended not to imply homology, so that marginal M3L of C. elizae, for example, was not homologous with M3L of N. americana— they correspond, respectively, to plates t and I of the comparative notation. In earlier studies of cornutes and mitrates, such an objective system was necessary. However, comparative anatomy depends on recognizing and naming homologies, accepting the risk of thereby making mistakes. Accordingly, a comparative, non- objective plate notation was proposed by Jefferies and Prokop (1972) when describing the crownward cornutc 442 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 k-spike narrow groove (eer) ventral branchial integument l-appendage right integument right posterior Integument branchial slit posterior U“plate dorsal branchial Integument gonopore anus dorsal groove (median eye) TEXT-FIG. 10. Protocystites menevensis Hicks; reconstructed external morphology, a, dorsal; b, ventral; c, posterior; and d, right lateral aspects. Letters a w, e, ii, and numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 indicate plate homologies as explained in text. The exact number of branchial slits is not known. JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 443 > ventral prominence keel incipient hinge-line TEXT-FIG. 1 1 . Ceratocystis perneri Jaekel; reconstructed external morphology, a, dorsal; h, ventral; c, posterior; and t/, right lateral aspects. Reliculocarpos hcmiisi. In this notation, marginal plates are given lower-case letters of the roman alphabet. The series starts at plate a, which occupies a position near, but not at, the anterior left part of the head, and is followed by plate b just left of the mouth, and so forth in clockwise order in dorsal aspect around the head to finish at plate 1 in R. hanusi. In applying this scheme to species other than R. hantisi, additional letters are interpolated as necessary and, since the number of homologous series of marginal plates in cornutes and 444 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 J fractures matrix internal surface of ventral plates keel l-appendage anterior U flap posterior U integument of buc. cavity e-spike integument of pharynx f-spike ?gonopore-anus gonorectal groove TEXT-FIG. 12. Nevadaecyslis americana (Ubaghs); Upper Cambrian, Nevada, United States National Museum 143237; diagrammatic drawing of the dorsal aspect of the only known specimen and holotype (redrawn after Jefferies 1969, text-hg. 4). mitrates now exceeds twenty-six, the English roman alphabet is supplemented by letters from German and French (ii, e, etc). (We do not imply that plate ii has any special relation to plate u, nor plate e to plate e; nor do the U-plates of the branchial slits form part of this notation, for with them the U is upper case and describes the shape of the plates.) For centrodorsal plates, in which homologies can be recognized between Ceratocystis periieri, P. menevensis, and N. americana, the numbers 1 to 6 are employed, starting from the situation in C. perneri where the sequence is once again clockwise in dorsal aspect. Suffixes are used when several plates correspond to a single dorsal plate in C. perneri. This comparative notation is difficult to memorize, but becomes clear in the text-figures. Various protuberances were borne on the heads of cornutes and, like the plates, these can now be homolo- gized from species to species. Such processes were of two main types— appendages and ventral spikes— though the distinction between the two is not precise. Appendages made up parts of the anterior margin of the head and projected horizontally, or horizontally and downwards; spikes, by contrast, projected downwards from the ventral surface. Jefferies (1968) used an objective notation for the spikes (Sir, S2R, etc.) much like the notation used for the plates, whereas the appendages were referred to as ‘left’, ‘left oral’, and ‘right oral’. In this paper, we replace these terms by a new notation which refers to the plate on which the process was carried, e.g. e-spike, l-appendage. As with the plates, the new notation is not objective but implies homology. It is convenient, because a plate in cornutes seldom bears more than one individualized process (though that process is often complicated in shape) and such a process is never constituted from more than one plate. The nomenclature of different types of stereom follows Smith (19846, fig. 3.2). General external features and the plates of the head. P. menevensis (text-fig. 10) consisted of a head and a tail, like every other cornute and mitrate. The outline of the head was boot-shaped, as was common among primitive cornutes and it particularly resembled that of C. perneri in that plate k extended further leftward than plate 1. The right margin of the head, as reconstructed, was almost straight and at right angles to the posterior margin. This could be a mistake in the reconstruction caused by tectonic distortion, but if there is no mistake the right margin of the head was different in shape to that of C. perneri in which it ran JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN; CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 445 leftwards and forwards. In P. menevensis it was in this respect probably more like N. ainericana, "Cothunw- cystis' fellinensis, and C. elizae. The ventral surface of the head of P. menevensis was made up, except for a small oral integument, of large plates and would have been rigid (PI. 55, fig. 1). The dorsal surface also contained some large plates, but was mainly covered with plated integument (PI. 54, fig. 1). This combination of rigid floor and flexible roof is otherwise known in cornutes only in N. aniericana. It was morphologically intermediate between Cercitocystis perneri, where the floor and roof were both rigid, and Cothwnocystis elizae, for example, where the floor and roof were both flexible though the floor was crossed by a strut. The large plates forming the floor of P. menevensis can be called a ventral shield. We shall describe this shield first, before discussing the skeleton attached to it dorsally. TEXT-FIG. 13. 'Cotinirnocysris' fellinensis Ub- aghs; Lower Ordovician (probably Lower Ar- enig), Montagne Noire, France; dorsal aspect of marginal skeleton of head (redrawn after Ubaghs 1969, fig. 19). The right edge of the ventral shield, and of the head, of P. menevensis was made up of plates g, f, e, and c. Plate g (PI. 55, figs. I and 3; PI. 58, fig. 1; PI. 60, figs. 3, 4, 9, 10) was the first right ventral marginal (M|rv iri the old notation) and included the right half of the tail attachment. Much of its posterior part was almost vertical, forming part of the posterior wall of the head. Its anterior part was horizontal, however, forming part of the rigid floor. Where ventral and horizontal portions joined, there was a distinct fold (oesophageal fold), concave dorsally and convex ventrally, which ran rightwards into plate f. Another fold, similarly convex downwards but wider and resembling half of a crescent in plan view, was situated just anterior to the tail attachment and underlay the right half of the posterior coelom (see below, under The chambers and soft anatomy of the head’). Plate f (PI. 54, figs. 1 and 3; PI. 55, figs. 1, 4, 5; PI. 56, fig. 1; PI. 57, figs. 1 and 4; PI. 58, figs. 1; PI. 60, figs. 5, 6, 7) formed the posterior right corner of of the ventral shield, i.e. the ‘heel’ part of the ‘boot’. Like plate g, it was divided into a horizontal portion, which was part of the floor, and a vertical portion, which formed part of the posterior and right lateral walls of the head. Plate f was drawn out horizontally into a sharp-edged peripheral flange and the posterior end of this flange was turned downwards to form the f-spike. Plate f carried the right end of the oesophageal fold, the rest of which was on plate g. Plate e (pi. 54, figs. 1-3; PI. 55, fig. 1; PI. 56, fig. 1; PI. 57, fig. 3; PI. 58, fig. 4) formed the middle part of the right edge of the ventral shield. It had a sharp-edged peripheral flange which was continuous with that of plate f and which ran forward into that of plate c. In dorsal aspect it showed, on the right, a distinct marginal frame, the middle part of which articulated with dorsocentral plate 5. On the ventral surface of plate e there was an e-spike, homologous with that of other cornutes. We use the term ‘spike’ for consistency with other cornutes, though the word is not totally appropriate in P. menevensis since the process was rounded in shape and, in particular, had the same slope in all directions, whereas most spikes in cornutes have the anterior slope steeper and sharper than the posterior one. The e-spike of P. menevensis was hollow, corresponding to a circular concavity in the internal dorsal face of plate e. 446 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 l-appendage b-appendage b mouth c-appendage muscle articulation (d branchial slits gonopore-anus •• • • •. «Vf fore tail mid tail hind tail t-spike k-spike stylocone TEXT-FIG. 14. Cotlnmiocysfis elizae Bather; Upper Ordovician (Ashgill), Girvan, Scotland (redrawn after Jefferies 1968, text-fig. 1), with most of the hind tail omitted, a, dorsal; b, ventral; c, posterior; and O v> TEXT-FIG. 26. A cladogram of the Dexiothetica to show the position of Protocystites menevensis Hicks within the chordate stem group and the origin of some important evolutionary novelties. For fuller explanation see text. 472 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 cladogram are therefore in the first place conventional. They can sometimes be shown to have existed, when they did exist, by two types of argument— morphological and stratigraphical. The morphological argument requires that some feature has arisen within the terminal branch, as an autapomorphy of the single species or the species group at the end of the branch. The stratigraphical argument requires, in the present case, that the animal or animals at the end of the branch be contemporaneous with, or preferably later than, their more crownward neighbour. To show that a terminal branch did not exist is difficult or impossible. In the present instance this means that, even if the morphological and stratigraphical arguments for the existence of a terminal segment failed, it would be impossible to prove that any known form lay exactly in the chordate stem lineage, in the sequence of even-numbered segments 6-24. Text-fig. 26 is not comprehensive crownward of N. americana (segments 12-24) nor anti-crownward of C. penieri (segment 6), in the sense that known fossils other than those named belong, or can be suspected of belonging, in those regions. Moreover, the parts of the diagram crownward of Cothurnocystis elizae are not discussed in this paper, since they are treated by Jefferies (1986, Chs. 7 and 9). Particular difficulties arise in establishing the primitiveness of some features of Ceratocystis pemeri—lhe least crownward cornute known. When a feature is found in C. penieri and also in some related forms, then there is no dilemma. For example, C. penieri had a hydropore, uniquely among cornutes; but this feature also occurs in crown echinoderms and in hemichordates (left mesocoel pore), which indicates that it existed in segments 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 of text-fig. 26 and disappeared within segment 8. Again, C. penieri had a rigid floor to the head, and this also existed in P. menevensis and N. americana., this indicates that a rigid floor existed throughout segments 7-11, in the crownward part of 6, and in the anti-crownward part of 12, and that it disappeared in segment 12. Features unique to C. penieri among known forms, however, present difficulties; for prima facie, they could either have arisen in segment 7, as autapomorphies of C. penieri, or they could be primitive features of cornutes present throughout segment 7, in the crownward part of segment 6, and in the anti-crownward part of segment 8. The stratigraphical criterion of primitiveness is of no help in resolving such dilemmas, for the Cambrian record of cornutes it too incomplete, on several grounds. First, only four cornutes have been described from the Cambrian, i.e. C. penieri, P. menevensis, and the ‘stylophoran’ of Sprinkle ( 1 976, pi. 1 , fig. 1 ), all of which are approximately contemporaneous and Middle Cambrian in age, and N. americana which is Upper Cambrian in age. Secondly, these four forms are consider- ably different from each other, while N. americana from the Upper Cambrian is in most ways intermediate between P. menevensis and Sprinkle’s ‘stylophoran’ (which broadly belongs to Cothur- nocystis) from the Middle Cambrian. Thirdly, new forms are being discovered in the Cambrian (four new species of Cambrian cornute came to our attention in the years 1981 to 1985, one of which is P. menevensis). In deciding what features are primitive among Cambrian cornutes, therefore, stratigraphy is useless. (We do not deny that stratigraphy can indicate primitiveness in other groups of fossils (Fortey and Jefferies 1982).) Functional analysis can sometimes suggest which of two alternative feature states is the more primitive. Thus, in having its gonopore-anus to the right of the tail, Ceratocystis penieri was less efficiently laid out than other cornutes, whose gonopore-anus was to the left of the tail and therefore in the branchial outwash, so that faeces and gametes could be flushed away. This suggests: that having the gonopore-anus to the right of the tail was more primitive than the alternative; that this primitive state existed in the crownward part of segment 6 of text-fig. 26, the anti-crownward part of segment 8, and throughout segment 7; and that the change to the location left of the tail happened in segment 8. Such arguments are risky, in as much as functional interpretations are always uncertain. Anti-crownward extrapolation of an evolutionary trend can also be invoked to indicate that a unique feature of C. penieri was primitive. The anti-crownward sequence Cothurnocystis elizae, ^C.' fellinensis, N. americana, P. menevensis, Ceratocystis penieri is one of decreasing relationship to the chordate crown group on several grounds. It is also one of decreasing flexibility of the dorsal surface. This suggests that the rigid, or almost rigid, roof to the head seen in C. penieri, and only in JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 473 it among known cornutes, is the evolutionary starting point from which the flexible roof, seen in increasing degree crownward among other cornutes, developed— essentially in segments 8, 10, 12, and 14 of the chordate stem lineage. However, this argument lacks logical rigour, to the extent that evolution may reverse in direction. It can partly, but not completely, be subsumed as a series of more rigorous sub-arguments in which C. perneri is not unique among known forms. For example, C. perneri and its crownward neighbour P. menevensis are the only known cornutes showing individualized plates 3 and 5 in the roof of the head. If C. perneri, because of its hydropore, is the least crownward cornute known, then P. menevensis is its crownward neighbour because it retains plates 3 and 5 (among other arguments) and all other cornutes lack these plates as distinguishable elements, presumably having lost them. But sub-arguments of this sort can show only that a condition seen in P. menevensis is primitive with respect to all cornutes except C. perneri. They cannot show that a condition known uniquely in C. perneri is primitive. Anti-crownward extrapola- tion of evolutionary trends goes further than these sub-arguments, but is less logically rigorous. It can be expressed, in this instance, as a working rule: when P. menevensis shows some feature state intermediate between that of C. perneri on the one hand, and N. americana on the other, then the feature state in C. perneri is likely to represent the primitive condition from which the others were derived. The primitiveness, or otherwise, of a feature known uniquely in C. perneri therefore remains undecided if its primitiveness for cornutes cannot be established in one of the following ways: 1, by outgroup comparison with echinoderms (such a comparison, if successful, would imply its existence in the crownward part of segment 1, and at least throughout segments 2, 4, 6, and 7 of text-fig. 26); 2, by its presence, perhaps in less marked form, in the least crownward of other cornutes; 3, by functional arguments. Such unique features of C. perneri could be primitive for cornutes (present at the junction of segments 6, 7, and 8) or could be autapomorphies of C. perneri evolved within segment 7. Only the recognition of stem chordates less crownward than C. perneri, or of nodal- group dexiothetes, will favour one or other of these alternatives. To assume that all features of C. perneri, even those known uniquely in it, were primitive for cornutes and existed in the chordate stem lineage, is not legitimate and leads into an intellectual trap. For it is like assuming, in view of Ornithorhynchus, that all other mammals evolved from a toothless ancestor, with a duck-like beak; or, in view of modern amphioxus, that the latest common ancestor of vertebrates and acraniates was brainless, which cannot be true (Jefferies 1973). The above methodological discussion assumes the relationships which will be discussed in the rest of this section. This is legitimate, since the assignment of different cornutes to their places in the cornute cladogram does not start from a blank (see Jefferies 1979; in press, Ch. 9). Our task is to fit P. menevensis into a phylogenetic framework which is already partly known. The cladogram of the dexiothetes and the position of Protocystites menevensis within the chordate stem group The cladogram shown in text-fig. 26 is, in our view, the most parsimonious and probable arrange- ment of the Dexiothetica, so far as the facts at present available indicate. The evolutionary novelties assignable to the various segments are as follows. Segment 1. In this segment, which was the dexiothete stem lineage, a form like the pterobranch Cephalodiscus lay down on its originally right side and lost the openings and tentacles of the right side and probably also the pterobranch stalk. This process of lying on the right side, with all its consequences, can be called dexiothetism. Henceforth, in the dexiothete stem lineage, the primitive and hemichordate right became ventral in chordate terms and hemichordate left became dorsal. Also a calcite skeleton of stereom mesh was acquired (Jefferies 1986, Chs. 2 and 7). No known fossil forms have yet been assigned to the dexiothete stem group through which segment 1 would have passed. Segment 2. This is the least crownward part of the echinoderm stem lineage. The evolutionary novelties acquired in the echinoderm stem lineage as a whole (segments 2 and 4) can now be 474 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 discussed much more fully than before because of two stimulating and perspicacious recent papers (Paul and Smith 1984; Smith 1984u). In segment 2 fixation occurred, probably by extending the lower surface of the animal (corresponding to the hemichordate right side and the chordate ventral surface) down into the sea-floor. As seen from above, the mouth remained peripheral in position as in a cornute. The ambulacra leading into the mouth (presumably connected with the water vascular system and thus with the left mesocoel = left hydrocoel) became triradiate. Any gill slits on the upper surface were lost— those on the lower surface would already have disappeared as a result of dexiothetism. Thus segment 2 gave rise to the helicoplacoids as a plesion. Segment 3. This is purely conventional, and perhaps did not exist. Three genera of helicoplacoid are known. Segment 4. In this segment the mouth moved into the centre of the upper surface by the process known in crinoid embryology as torsion. The triradiate ambulacra became pentaradiate but retained a distinct 2-1- 1 -E 2 pattern reflecting the primitive triradiality. The upper surface became flat. This produced the form Camptostroma which may actually lie on the echinoderm stem lineage or even be the latest common ancestor of living echinoderms (the first crown echinoderm). It thus belongs, in the present state of knowledge, to the nodal group of the echinoderms. Segment 5 is conventional and perhaps did not exist. All known echinoderms, apart from helicoplacoids and perhaps Camptostroma, are probably crown-group echinoderms, being assignable to one or other of the two primary echinoderm sub- groups (Pelmatozoa and Eleutherozoa). The meanings of the words ‘dorsal’ and ‘ventral’ require discussion. The upper surface of pelmato- zoans and stem-group echinoderms is homologous, if the above account is correct, with the left side of hemichordates and with the upper (i.e. dorsal) surface of chordates. Unfortunately, however, the use of the terms ‘dorsal’ and ‘ventral’ in echinoderm literature is based on eleutherozoans such as starfishes and sea-urchins which have inverted in evolution so that the primitive upper surface faces downwards. Hence ‘dorsal’ and ‘ventral’ in echinoderms mean the exact opposite to what they do in chordates. The chordate usage clearly has priority (Latin dorsum = back; venter = belly) and is habitual to far more people than the echinoderm usage. The best solution to this nomenclator- ial difficulty would be to eliminate the words ‘dorsal’ and ‘ventral’, henceforth, from echinoderm terminology. The words ‘aboral’ and ‘oral’ have respectively the same meaning as the conventional ‘dorsal’ and ‘ventral’ in all echinoderm groups except helicoplacoids, for which the words ‘upper’ and ‘lower’ can fittingly be used with their obvious meanings. Segments 6 and 7. A large number of important changes occurred in segment 6: the locomotory tail was acquired and reached roughly the condition seen in Ceratocystis perneri with fore, mid, and hind portions, while the soft parts of the tail probably included muscle blocks, notochord, and dorsal nerve cord; the brain was developed at the anterior end of the tail; the plates of the head evolved, probably to an almost rigid condition as seen in C. perneri, the water vascular system was lost, but the hydropore was retained as outlet for the axial sinus (which in the early embryology of crinoids it still is); the gill slits increased to seven in number (assuming that the single gill slit on the left side of Cephalodiscus represents the primitive complement in Dexiothetica), and probably an endostylar mucous filter developed inside the enlarged pharynx; the ear, paired trigeminal ganglia, and median eye developed; and the layout of the head chambers seen in Ceratocystis perneri evolved, with the viscera concentrated in the right anterior coelom to the right of the tail, and with a large pharynx, a large buccal cavity, and a posterior coelom. A virtual left anterior coelom lay dorsal to the other chambers. Features known uniquely in C. perneri create special methodological problems, as already argued. Many of them were probably primitive for cornutes, i.e. were present in the crownward part of segment 6. Such include: the almost rigid surface of the head (by anti-crownward extrapolation); the presence of a single plate (w-l-a-l-x) (by anti-crownward extrapolation since plates w, a, and x are less differentiated from each other in P. menevensis than in "Cothurnocystis' fellinensis for JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 475 example); the large number ( > 2 on either side) of dorsal segments per ventral ossicle in the hind tail (by anti-crownward extrapolation); the presence of a hydropore (by outgroup comparison with echinoderms); the position of the gonopore-anus to the right of the tail (by functional argument); the absence of a high wall in front of the brain (by functional argument since this wall is associated with the presence of the rectum in the posterior coelom, and this in turn depends on the gonopore- anus being left of the tail). Many features known uniquely in Ceratocystis perneri, however, are of indeterminate status. They may have been primitive for cornutes and present in the crownward part of segment 6, or they may be autapomorphies of C. perneri among known forms, and in that case evolved in segment 7. Such in- clude: the absence of an oral pyramid; the position of two of the gill slits (nos. 1 -I- 2) anterior to the left posterior dorsal crest; the ear penetrating plate i (it penetrates plate j in P. menevensis); the presence of plate o; the separation, in some specimens, of gonopore from anus; the large number of segments in the fore tail (about seventeen rings of successive plates on each side). The allocation of these features as evolutionary novelties to their correct segment must await the recognition of plesions less crown- ward than C. perneri, or perhaps between C. perneri and P. menevensis. Segment 8. Most of the differences between C. perneri and P. menevensis probably arose as evolution- ary novelties in this segment. The exceptions are features that arose in segment 7, none of which is certainly identifiable, and those that arose in segment 9 as autapomorphies of P. menevensis. Evolutionary novelties that probably arose in segment 8 include: loss of hydropore; migration of gonopore and anus to the left of the tail and perhaps their unification to a single opening (if this latter had not already happened in segment 6); acquisition of a high wall behind the posterior coelom, in plates g and j, forming the cerebral basin; increase in the angle between the posterior and right margins of the head (if correctly reconstructed in P. menevensis)-, reduction in the number of segments in dorsal parts of the hind tail to only slightly more than one per ossicle on either side proximally; acquisition of an oral cone (if this did not already exist in segment 6); better development of f-spike and k-spike; reduction in size of plate y. Segment 9. Features found exclusively in P. menevensis, but not in C. perneri nor in N. americana, and which do not represent morphological intermediates between these two species, were probably autapomorphies of P. menevensis, i.e. were evolved in segment 9. Such features are minor but do seem to exist. They include: the very light build of the skeleton with two-dimensional retiform stereom in large parts of the dorsal integument and ventral floor, strengthened in the floor by irregularly placed struts to give a ‘space-frame’; the roundness of the e-spike; the bluntness of the ridge on plates 1 and 2; perhaps the small number of segments in the foretail (only three, as compared with about seventeen in C. perneri and five in N. americana). The lightly built stereom strengthened by ribs, and the rounded dorsal ridges would have reduced weight and can probably be seen as adaptations to life on a very soft sea-bottom. The small number of segments in the fore tail perhaps suggests that P. menevensis was less motile than C. perneri or N. americana. The autapomorphies of P. menevensis show that segment 9 was not purely conventional but really existed. Segment 10. Most of the differences between N. americana and P. menevensis are shared by N. americana with more crownward plesions and therefore arose as evolutionary novelties in segment 10. They include: the strut as a thickening of plate g in N. americana— as already mentioned, the strut may have begun from the internal process of plate g as seen in P. menevensis or by the stabilization of apposed ribs in plates g and a in the ‘space-frame’ structure as seen in P. menevensis (but in that case the space-frame type of construction would not be an autapomorphy of P. menevensis)-, the clear differentiation of anterior U-plates in the branchial slits; the breakup of plate ii into three pieces (though perhaps it was already in two pieces in P. menevensis)-, the disappearance of plates 3 and 5 as recognizable entities and the smaller size of plate 2; the fact that plate d is part of the frame instead of merely forming part of the floor of the head behind the mouth; the fact that plate 1 extends more leftwards than plate k; the accurately opposite position of left and right hind- tail plates. As already said several times, the only available specimen of N. americana is poor. 476 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 Segment II. Two features of N. americana are unique to it and are thus likely to be autapomorphies of the species and evolved in segment 1 1. These are the rightward spread of the e-spike and f-spike so that both are clearly visible in dorsal aspect. These autapomorphies show that segment 1 1 actually existed. This is also evident on stratigraphical grounds, for N. americana is less crownward than the Cothurnocystis-\\ke species of Sprinkle (1976), particularly in having a rigid floor to the head, but is stratigraphically later (Upper Cambrian rather than Middle Cambrian). Segment 12. For purposes of text-fig. 26 we choose "C.' fellinensis to represent its particular plesion, mainly because Ubaghs (1969) has described this species with his usual thoroughness (text-fig. 13). Many other species of cornute belong near this position but cannot yet be accurately placed— among them the undescribed Middle Cambrian ‘stylophoran’ of Sprinkle (1976). Evolutionary novelties which can be ascribed to segment 12 are as follows: flexibility of the floor of the head (apart from the strut); plate t and the t-spike; and breakdown of the triple-arch of the dorsal surface so that only a line of spines anterior to the gill slits remains as a vestige. In ^C.' fellinensis plate k extends somewhat further leftwards than plate 1. This could be a primitive feature, in which case N. americana acquired the opposite condition in segment 11, or could be a secondary reversion simulating a primitive condition. Segment 13. The only evidence for this segment is stratigraphical: ' C fellinensis is contemporaneous with Galliaecystis lignieresi and Amygdalotheca griffei (both from the Lower Arenig of the Montagne Noire) and these two species are more crownward. Segment 14. The chief changes in this segment are: the loss of plate y and the median eye; the loss of plate x; and the loss of the spines which in ^C.’ fellinensis form a curved row anterior to the gill slits. So far as can at present be determined, the family Scotiaecystidae {Scotiaecystis, Thoralicystis, and Bobemiaecystis) belongs to the plesion of C. elizae. Segment 15. This must have existed for stratigraphical reasons. C. elizae, from the uppermost Ordovician (Ashgill) of Scotland is younger than all the cornute plesions crownward of it, i.e. G. lignieresi and A. griffei, both from the Lower Arenig, Reticulocarpos hanusi from the Llanvirn, and R. pissotensis from the Llandeilo. It is also younger than the earliest known members of the chordate crown group (the mitrates Peltocystis corniita and Chinianocarpos thorali from the Lower Arenig of the Montagne Noire). Segments 16 to 24. We shall not discuss these here since there is nothing to add to the account given by Jefferies (1986). Thus Protocystites menevensis fits into a plesion between those of Ceratocystis perneri and N. americana. It increases our knowledge of the evolution of the chordate stem lineage within the less crownward cornutes. LOCOMOTION IN PROTOCYSTITES MENEVENSIS The strange shape of cornutes such as P. menevensis demands a functional explanation. Details of their morphology suggest that they could move rearwards, at least occasionally, pulled by the tail. Thus in Cotlmrnocystis elizae or S. curvata (Jefferies, in press, Ch. 7) the ventral spikes of the head have points or sharp edges anteriorly but blunt terminations posteriorly, while the anterior appendages would have sloped forwards and downwards into the mud. Both of these types of anteroposterior asymmetry would tend to prevent forward movement and to facilitate rearward movement. Also there is evidence that the tail was highly flexible in all cornutes, as is appropriate to a locomotory organ. Neither the anteroposterior asymmetry of the spikes and appendages, nor the flexibility of the tail, can be explained if the animal always rested immobile on the sea-bottom. The tail of C. elizae would mainly have moved from side to side, as indicated by the existence of gaps between the major plates of the fore tail on right and left but not in the vental mid-line. Also the end part of the hind tail of C. elizae seems to be specially adapted for bending downwards. The JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 477 external morphology of this species therefore suggests that the animal pulled itself across the sea- floor by side-to-side wagging of the tail, gripping the sea-floor intermittently during the locomotory cycle by pushing the distal part of the hind tail downwards into the mud. The fore-tail plates of Ceratocystis perneri and P. menevensis probably likewise flexed from side to side, in view of the overlap of the fore-tail plates across the ventral mid-line. Similarly, there is evidence that the mitrates moved rearwards pulled by the tail, as suggested in particular by the presence of cuesta- shaped ribs with the steep slope of the cuestas always morphologically anterior (Jefferies 1984, 1986). An asymmetrical shape, such as the head of a boot-shaped cornute, is easier to pull across a surface than to push, since it is directionally stable when pulled but directionally unstable when pushed. This is probably the fundamental reason why cornutes and mitrates moved rearwards. With these thoughts in mind, we now reconstruct the locomotory cycle of P. menevensis in detail. In what follows, we use the word ‘yaw’ in the standard sense for rotation about a vertical axis and ‘roll’ for rotation about a horizontal, anteroposterior axis. The two largest ventral spikes of P. menevensis are situated near the left and right ends of the head on plates k and f respectively. This suggests that movement involved yaw, with left spike and right spike acting alternately as pivots; and such a yawing motion agrees with the presumed side- to-side flexion of the tail as suggested by the ventral overlap of the fore-tail plates. The motion would have been somewhat like one way of moving a heavy cupboard across a floor, by pivoting it alternately about its left and right leading corners. The muscles moving the head of P. menevensis would have been mainly those filling the large lumen of the fore tail; these would have represented the motor of the animal. An adequate reconstruction of the locomoty cycle must, therefore, explain how pressure was placed alternately on left and right spikes during crawling (on the k-spike and then the f-spike, and then the k-spike again). Our reconstruction of the locomotory cycle of P. menevensis is given in text-fig. 27. Text-fig. 21a shows successive stages of the cycle in dorsal aspect and in absolute space, whereas text-fig. 276 shows the head and respective positions of the tail, always in exact posterior aspect. The drawings in text-fig. 27 are based on an adjustable model where the notochord in the fore tail is represented by a flexible ruler which allows side-to-side flexion, while the head and mid and hind tail are represented by their outlines drawn on stiff white card, as described by Jefferies (1984). The dorsal projections of the mid and hind tail in text-fig. 21a have been modified according to the reconstructed inclinations of these parts in text-fig. 276. The outline of the head is shown in dorsal aspect, neglecting the effects of inclination during roll. Ventrally prominent structures (ventral spikes, etc.) are indicated by concentrations of dots, whose density suggests the degree of ventral prominence. Each arrow in text-fig. 27 connects a particular anatomical point in one stage with its new position in the next stage. An arrow thus indicates approximately the direction of travel, at the stage shown, of the point in question. The lengths of the arrows for the different points of a given stage also suggest their velocities relative to each other. However, successive stages shown are not supposed to be separated by equal intervals of time. The relative lengths of arrows for the same point at different stages therefore have no meaning. We have assumed that mud had strength and could resist motion, whereas water did not. The force produced by the mud on the moving tail would have been equal and opposite to the force exerted by the tail on the mud. Thus the arrows of movement are opposite in direction to the forces that the movement provoked. At stage 1 of text-fig. 21a, 6 the hind tail was buried in the sea-floor and curved ventrally (by the relaxation of its dorsal muscles). This position represented the close of the previous locomotory cycle. By stage 2 the hind tail had been raised out of the mud and straightened. Between stages 1 and 2, therefore, the tip of the tail had moved upwards and a resultant downward force would have acted on the hind tail, tending to rotate the head in roll and to drive the right spike (f) into the sea- bed while lifting the left spike (k) out of the sea-bed. The actual axis of rotation of the head would have been approximately anteroposterior and probably located near the mid-ventral line of the tail attachment, which protrudes ventrally below the general ventral surface of the head. This ventral protrusion would have allowed the head to rock, see-saw fashion, alternately to right and left, resting on the protrusion and on the mid-ventral line of the fore tail. 478 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 479 13 TEXT-FIG. 27. Protocystites menevensis Hicks; reconstructed locomotory cycle, a, dorsal aspect; b, posterior aspect (note that, unlike a, the viewpoint of successive diagrams is fixed relative to the animal but not in absolute space). Locomotion probably involved yaw, with the f-spike (on the right) and the k-spike (on the left) being used alternately as pivots. The head was pulled rearward by the tail when this penetrated the sea- bottom on the side farthest from the pivot. The movements of the tail in the vertical dimension, as seen in b, would automatically throw the weight of the head on to the intended pivot and lift the side of the head that was to be moved. 480 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 Through stages 2 to 5 the tail swung leftwards in the sea water to a position just left of the mid- line of the tail attachment. This movement, being in water, would have met little resistance and had no effect on the position of the head. By stage 5 the hind tail had moved down into the sea-floor. This would have tended to rotate the head in roll with the same sense as previously and thus to lift the left spike further and throw the weight of the head more on to the right spike (f). At stage 6, further movement of the tail leftwards towards the head had the effect of rotating the head in yaw about the right spike as pivot. As a consequence the left side of the head moved rearwards in space. This yaw continued until stage 7. At stage 8 the hind tail had been lifted out of the sea-floor. This movement was opposed by a force exerted by the mud downward on the hind tail which rotated the head in roll, driving the left spike down into the sea-floor and lifting the right spike. This rotation in roll was therefore opposite in sense to that between stages 1 and 2. Once again, the axis of rotation would probably have been approximately in the mid-line of the tail insertion, rocking on the ventral protrusion of the tail insertion and of the ventral mid-line of the fore tail. Through stages 8, 9, and 10 the tail moved rightward, but in the water. The movement would therefore have met with little resistance and would have had no effect on the position of the head. At stage 1 1 the mid and hind parts of the tail moved down into the sea-floor. Since these parts were right of the mid-line of the tail insertion and their movement was opposed by an upward force in the mud, the head would have tended to rotate in roll in the same sense as between stages 7 and 8, i.e. the left spike would have been driven further into the mud and the right spike lifted higher. The same rolling rotation would have tended to push the left oral appendage (b-appendage) downwards into the mud. Through stages 11 to 13 the tail flexed rightwards and rotated the head in yaw about the left (or k-) spike as pivot. Thus the right side of the head was moved rearwards. In this yawing rotation the parts of the head furthest from the pivot would have been supported on the b-appendage (left oral appendage). This was curved approximately, though not accurately, concentric to the k-spike and therefore would scarcely have resisted the yawing rotation about that spike. At stage 13 a position was reached exactly like stage 1, except that the head had moved rearwards and rightwards. Thus the locomotory cycle was complete. Locomotion, therefore, would probably have involved yaw alternately about the left and right spikes, combined with roll so that left and right spikes were alternately pushed into the mud and lifted clear of it. These motions of the head would have resulted automatically from the movements of the tail from side-to-side and up-and-down into the mud. The rolling movement would have been facilitated by the ventral protrusion of the head near the tail insertion. All boot-shaped cornutes, since they have spikes and appendages concentrated at left and right of the head and the same ventral protrusion of the head near the tail, probably crept rearwards somewhat in this manner. CONCLUSIONS P. menevensis Hicks, 1872, from the Middle Cambrian of South Wales, is a cornute and therefore a stem-group chordate. In the present paper it is described in detail for the first time and reconstructed. It shared with N. americana the remarkable condition that the roof of the head was flexible but the floor rigid. Within the chordate stem group, P. menevensis belongs to a plesion between that of C. perneri and that of N. americana. It is crownward of C. perneri (i.e. more closely related to the chordate crown group) especially in lacking a hydropore, in having the gonopore-anus to the left of the tail, and in the flexible, or partly flexible, roof to the head. It is less crownward than N. americana especially in lacking the strut, in retaining a greater number of individualized plates in the roof of the head, and in the absence of specialized U-plates framing each gill slit anteriorly. JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 481 Specialized features (autapomorphies) of P. nienevensis included the very lightly built stereom (particularly of the dorsal integument, of the right posterior wall of the head, and of parts of the floor of the head) and the presence of irregularly placed ribs in the lightly built parts of the floor. These autapomorphies were probably weight-saving adaptations favouring a life on very soft mud. As to soft parts, details of the superficial internal anatomy of P. nienevensis suggest the positions of the oesophagus, stomach, and intestine in the right anterior coelom. The left boundary of that coelom, or at least of its patent cavity, is indicated by a change in the stereom structure from retiform to almost imperforate along a line in the floor of the head. The locomotory cycle of P. nienevensis is reconstructed above. The animal probably crept rear- wards by pivoting alternately around spikes near the left and right posterior corners of the head. This movement was produced by waving the tail alternately to the left and right while lowering it into, or raising it out of, the mud in particular parts of the cycle. This same locomotory cycle was probably usual in boot-shaped cornutes and was therefore probably primitive for stem-group chordates, so far as these are at present known. Concerning morphological terminology, we have abandoned the objective notation of plates which was formerly used for cornutes and mitrates (e.g. Jefferies 1968). Instead we apply the comparative terminology proposed by Jefferies and Prokop (1972); this uses the same lower-case letter (a, b, e, li, etc.) for all plates believed to be homologous in cornutes and mitrates. The terms dorsal and ventral, as conventionally used in echinoderms, should be abandoned, since in that phylum they signify the exact opposite to what they mean in chordates. As to phylogenetic terminology, we argue that the plesion, though a useful concept in subdividing a stem group, is inherently paraphyletic when completely known, i.e. when all its constituent species are known. We use the term ‘crownward’ to mean ‘more closely related to the crown group’, with its opposites ‘less crownward’ to indicate phylogenetic position and ‘anti-crownward’ to indicate direction away from the crown group along the stem lineage. ‘Crownward’ is more restricted in meaning than ‘advanced’, for it means ‘advanced along the stem lineage only’. Hennig’s term ‘intermediate category’ is used for a paraphyletic group which provably comprises two or more adjacent plesions within a stem group. We propose the term ‘nodal group’ to comprise those forms which could, on the basis of synapomorphies, be crownward members of the stem group of some extant group, or could be primitive members of the crown group. Tectonic distortion of the material made P. nienevensis difficult to reconstruct. This distortion was corrected, to some extent, with the help of a computer program and a plotter. This correction was a necessary preliminary to the normal process of reconstructing the animal in three dimensions on a drawing board. Thus P. nienevensis, a strange boot-shaped animal, throws light on the evolution of our early ancestors and marks the oldest occurrence known of the chordate phylum in Britain. Acknowledgements. We should like to thank Drs Chris Paul (University of Liverpool) and Adrian Rushton (British Geological Survey) for invaluable help and advice in the early stages of the project. We are also grateful to Drs David Price (Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge) and Michael Bassett and Bob Owens (National Museum of Wales, Cardiff) for loan of material. Dr Andrew Smith critically read the text and made many helpful comments. Christopher Griffiths (University of Liverpool) gave much valuable help in the field. David Lewis (British Museum (Natural History)) carefully curated the abundant but scrappy material of P. nienevensis now preserved in that museum. Alan Paterson (Biometrics Section, BM(NH)) devised the computer program for correction of tectonic distortion and was always ready with help and advice. Dr John Cosgrove (Geology Department, Imperial College, London) gave useful advice on the problem of correcting tectonic distortion. Dr David Hardwick (Civil Engineering Department, Imperial College, London) kindly discussed locomotion of P. nienevensis from an engineer’s standpoint. Finally, we acknowledge our debt to the great Welsh amateur palaeontologist and collector Henry Hicks, who discovered P. nienevensis, recognized its distinctiveness, and put it on record; without his pioneering work the species would still probably be unknown. 482 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 REFERENCES ALLEN, p. M., JACKSON, A. A. and RUSHTON, A. w. A. 1981. The Stratigraphy of the Mawddach Group in the Cambrian succession of North Wales. Proc. Yorks, geol. Soc. 43, 295-329, pis. 16 and 17. ANGELIN, N. p. 1851. Pcilaeontologia suecica. Pars 1. Iconographia criistaceorwn formatiouis transitionis. Ease. 1, pp. 1-24, pis. 119. APPLEBY, R. M. and JONES, G. L. 1976. The analogue video-reshaper — a new tool for palaeontologists. Palaeon- tology, 19, 565-586. AX, p. 1984. Das phylogenetische System, 349 pp. Fischer, Stuttgart. In press. The phylogenetic system. Wiley, Chichester and New York. BARRANDE, j. 1 864. Notice preliminaire sur le systDne silurien et les trilohites cie Boheme, vi -I- 97 pp. Leipzig. 1887. Systeme silurien dii centre de la Boheme. Vol. VII. Classe des echinodermes, ordre des Cystidees, 233 pp. Prague. BASSLER, R. s. and MOODY, M. w. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am. 45, i vi, 1 -733. BATJJER, F. A. 1900. Chs. 8 12 (pp. 1-216) in lankester, e. r. A treatise on zoology. Part III. Echinoderma, 344 pp. London. 1913. Caradocian Cystidea from Girvan. Trans. R. soc. Edinb. 49, 359-521, pis. 1 6. BEYRICH, E. 1845. Ueher einige bohmischer Trilobiten, 47 pp., 1 pi. Berlin. BROGGER, w. c. 1878. Om paradoxidesskifrene ved Krekling. Nyt Mag. Natwvid. 24, 18-88, pis. 16. cowiE, j. w., RUSHTON, A. w. A. and STUBBLEFIELD, c. J. 1972. A Correlation of Cambrian rocks in the British Isles. Spec. Rep. geol. Soc. Land. 2, I -42. DAVIDSON, T. 1871 . A monograph of the British fossil Brachiopoda. Vol. 3. Devonian and Silurian. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.], pt. 7 (4), 249-397, pis. 38-50. FORTEY, R. A. and JEFFERIES, R. p. s. 1982. Fossils and phylogeny— a compromise approach. In joysey, k. a. and FRIDAY, A. E. (eds.). Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Spec. Vol. Syst. 21, 1-442. GILL, E. D. and CASTER, K. E. I960. Carpoid echinoderms from the Silurian and Devonian of Australia. Bull. Am. Paleont. 41 (185), 171. GRAY, J. 1957. How animals move, 144 pp. Penguin, London. GRONWALL, K. A. 1902. Bomholms Paradoxideslag og deres fauna. Damn. geol. Unders. (2) 13, i -xi, I 230, pis. 1-50. HARKNESS, R. and HICKS, H. 1871. On the ancient rocks of the St. David’s promontory. South Wales, and their fossil contents. With descriptions of the new species. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 27, 384-404. HENNiG, w. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics, 263 pp. University of Illinois, Urbana. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten, 436 pp. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main. 1981. (Translated pont, a.) Insect phylogeny, 514 pp. Wiley, Chichester. HICKS, H. 1881. The classification of the Eozoic and Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the British Isles. Pop. Sci. Rev. (NS) 5, 289-308. 1892. The fauna of the Olenellus Zone in Wales. Geol. Mag. (Dec. 3), 9, 21-24. and JONES, T. R. 1872. On some undescribed fossils from the Menevian Group. By Henry Hicks. With a note on the Entomostraca from the Cambrian rocks of St. David’s. By Prof. Rupert Jones. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 28, 173-185, pis. 5-7. and SALTER, J. w. 1866. Report on further researches in the Lingula Flags of South Wales, by Henry Hicks. With some notes in the sections and fossils by J. W. Salter, F.G.S, A.L.S. Rep. Br. zl55. Advmt Sci. 1865, 281-285. 1867. Second report on the ‘Menevian Group’ and the other formations at St. David’s, Pembroke- shire. Ibid. 1866, 182-186. HUTCHINSON, R. D. 1962. Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of southeastern Newfoundland. Bull, geol. Surv. Can. 88, 1 156, pis. 1-25. ILLING, V. c. 1916. The Paradoxidian fauna of a part of the Stockingford Shales. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 71, 396-450, pis. 28-38. JAEKEL, o. 1900. liber Carpoideen, eine neue Klasse von Pelmatozoen. Z. dt. geol. Ges. 52, 661 677. JEFFERIES, R. p. s. 1967. Some fossil chordates with echinoderm affinities. Svmp. zool. Soc. Lond. 20, 163-208. 1968. The subphylum Calcichordata (Jefferies, 1967)— primitive fossil chordates with echinoderm affini- ties. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.), 16, 243 339. JEFFERIES, LEWIS AND DONOVAN: CAMBRIAN CORNUTE 483 1969. Ceratocystis perneri Jaekel — a Middle Cambrian chordate with echinoderm affinities. Palaeon- tology, 12, 494-535. 1973. The Ordovician fossil Lagynocystis pyramidalis (Barrande) and the ancestry of amphioxus. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., B265, 409 469. 1979. The origin of chordates— a methodological essay, pp. 443-477. In house, m. r. (ed.). The origin of major invertebrate groups. Spec. Vol. Sysl. Ass. 12, 1-515. 1981a. Fossil evidence on the origin of the chordates and echinoderms, pp. 487 561. In ranzi, l. (ed.). Origine dei grand! phyla dei Metazoa. A/ti Conv. Accacl. naz. Lined, 49, 1 565. 1981b. In defence of the calcichordates. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 73, 351 396. 1984. Locomotion, shape, ornament and external ontogeny in some mitrate calcichordates. J. vert. Paleont. 4, 292-319. 1986. The ancestry of the vertebrates, 316 pp. British Museum (Natural History), London. JOYSEY, K. A., PAUL, c. R. c. and RAMSBOTTOM, w. H. c. 1967. Echinodermata: Pelmatozoa, Ch. 21. In HARLAND, w. B. (ed.). The fossil record— a symposium with documentation. Spec. Pnhl. geol. Soc. Land. 2, 1 827. and LEWIS, d. n. 1978. The English Silurian fossil Pkicocystites forhesianiis and the ancestry of the vertebrates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B282, 205-323. and PROKOP, R. J. 1972. A new calcichordate from the Ordovician of Bohemia and its anatomy, adap- tations and relationships. J. Linn. Soc. (Biol.), 4, 69 1 15. KESLING, R. V. 1967. Cystoids, pp. S85-S267. In moore, r. c. (ed.). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part S. Echinodermata 1(1), pp. S1-S296. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, New York and Lawrence, Kansas. KOBAYASHi, T. 1935. The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen with special study on the Cambrian trilobite genera and families. J. Fac. Sci. Tokyo Univ. (sect. 2), 4 (2), 49-344. LAKE, p. 1906-1946. A monograph of the British Cambrian trilobites. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.], 350 pp., 47 pis. MARTiNSSON, A. 1974. The Cambrian of Norden, pp. 185-283. In Holland, c. h. (ed.). Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the World. Vol. 2. Cambrian of the British Isles, Norden, and Spitzbergen. Wiley, London. NICHOLAS, T. c. 1916. The geology of the St. Tudwal’s Peninsula (Caernarvonshire). Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 71, 83-143. PATTERSON, c. 1981. Signihcance of fossils in determining evolutionary relationships. A. Rev. Ecol. Svst. 12, 194223. and ROSEN, d. e. 1977. Review of the ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull. Am. Mas. nat. Hist. 158, 84 172. PAUL, c. R. c. 1979. Caledonian echinoderms of the British Isles, pp. 453 456. In Harris, a. l., Holland, c. h. and LEAKE, B. E. (eds.). The Caledonides of the British Isles— reviewed. Spec. Publ. geol. Soc. Lond. 8, 1 768. and SMITH, A. B. 1984. The early radiation and phylogeny of echinoderms. Biol. Rev. 59, 443 481. PHILIP, G. M. 1979. Carpoids— echinoderms or chordates? Ibid. 54, 439-471. RAMSAY, A. c. 1866. The geology of North Wales. Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K. 3, i viii, 1-381. RAMSEY, J. G. 1967. Folding and fracturing of rocks, 568 pp. McGraw-Hill, New York. RUSHTON, A. w. A. 1974. The Cambrian of Wales and England, pp. 43 121. In Holland, c. h. (ed.). Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the World. Vol. 2. Cambrian of the British Isles, Norden and Spitzbergen. Wiley, London. 1979. A review of the Middle Cambrian Agnostida from the Abbey Shales, England. Alcheringa, 3, 43-61. SALTER, J. w. 1 863. On the discovery of Paradoxides in Britain. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 19, 274-277, pi. 1 3. 1864. On some new fossils from the Eingula-Flags of Wales. Ibid. 20, 233-241, pi. 13. 1865. On some additional fossils from the Lingula-Elags. By J. W. Salter, Esq., A.L.S., F.G.S. with a note on the genus Anapolenus', By Henry Hicks Esq., M.R.C.S. Ibid. 21, 476 482. 1873. A catalogue of the collection of Cambrian and Silurian fossils contained in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge, 204 pp. Cambridge University, Cambridge. and HICKS, h. 1867. On a new Lingulella from the red Eower Cambrian rocks of St. David’s. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 23,339-341. 1869. On some fossils from the ‘Menevian Group’. Ibid. 25, 4 47, pis. 2 and 3. SEiLACHER, A. and HEMLEBEN, c. 1966. Spurenfauna und Bildungstiefe der Hunsruckschiefer. Notizbl. hess. Landesamt. Bodenforsch. Wiesbaden, 94, 40 53. 484 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 SMITH, A. B. 1984a. Classification of the Echinodermata. Palaeontology, 27, 431-459. 1984fi. Echinoid palaeobiology, 190 pp. George Allen & Unwin, London. SPRINKLE, j. 1976. Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Cambrian echinoderms from the Rocky Mountains. Geology Stud. Brigham Young Univ. 23, 61-73. STEAD, K. T. G. and WILLIAMS, B. p. J. 1971. The Cambrian rocks of North Pembrokeshire. In bassett, d. and BASSETT, M. G. (eds.). Geological excursions in South Wales and the Forest of Dean. National Museum of Wales, Cardiff. TAYLOR, K. and RUSHTON, A. w. A. 1972. The pre-Westphalian geology of the Warwickshire Coalfield, with an account of three boreholes in the Merevale area. Bull. geol. Surv. Gt Br. 35, i-vii, 1 150, pis. 112. THOMAS, A. T., OWENS, R. M. and RUSHTON, A. w. A. 1984. Trilobites in British stratigraphy. Spec. Rep. geol. Soc. Fond. 16, 1 78. THULBORN, R. A. 1984. The avian relationships of Archaeoptervx, and the origin of birds. J. Finn. Soc. (Zool.), 82,119 158. UBAGHS, G. 1963. Cothurnocystis Bather, Phyllocystis Thoral and an undetermined member of the order Soluta (Echinodermata, Carpoidea) in the uppermost Cambrian of Nevada. J. Paleont. 37, 1133 1142, pis. 151 and 152. 1967. Stylophora, pp. S495 S565. In moore, r. c. (ed.). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part S. Echinodermata 1(2), pp. S297-S650. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, New York and Lawrence, Kansas. 1969. Les echinodermes carpoides de I’ordovicien inferieur de la Montagne Noire, 1 12 pp. Cah. Paleont., C.N.R.S. Paris. 1981. Reflexions sur la nature et la fonction de I’appendice articule des carpoides Stylophora (Echino- dermata). Annls Pcdeont. (Invertebres), 67, 33-48. R. P. S. JEFFERIES Department of Palaeontology British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD M. LEWIS Department of Geology University College PO Box 78, Cardiff CEl IXL and S. K. DONOVAN Typescript received 21 February 1986 Revised typescript received 28 July 1986 Department of Geology University of the West Indies Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica A REVIEW OE EAVOSITID AEEINITIES by COLIN T. SCRUTTON Abstract. Although the favositids have been traditionally interpreted as a group of Palaeozoic tabulate corals, there has been persistent speculation, particularly over the last decade, that they could be the massive basal skeletons of sponges and should be transferred to the Porifera. Two recent papers, claiming respectively the preservation of spicules and the fossilization of soft polyps, strongly focus the dispute. Here, all the evidence relating to the affinities of favositids, including these recent claims, is reviewed. It is concluded that this evidence strongly favours retention of the favositids within the Tabulata and assignment of the Tabulata to the Cnidaria Anthozoa. The favositids are an important group of extinct organisms with a massive or branched calcareous coralline skeleton and are conventionally assigned to the Palaeozoic subclass Tabulata. Almost all specialists classify the Tabulata as corals in the anthozoan Cnidaria (Hill 1981). That the favositids might be sponges was first seriously suggested when the sclerosponges were discovered early this century (Kirkpatrick 1912), an observation largely overlooked and ignored at the time. During the last twelve years, however, the rediscovery of the sclerosponges has promoted a long-running debate concerning the affinities of favositids and even of the Tabulata as a whole (Hartman and Goreau 1975; Fliigel 1976; Stel 1978; Oliver 1979, 1986; Scrutton 1979; Oekentorp and Stel 1985). Two recent papers appear to polarize the argument: the claimed discovery of spicules in the favositid Thamnopora (Kazmierezak 1984), and the report of fossilized polyps in Favosites itself (Copper 1985). All specialists regard Favosites and Thamnopora as closely related so both presumably cannot be right. This paper sets these recent conflicting claims in context by reviewing all the evidence relating to the problem of affinity of these structurally simple fossils. Some supposed tabulate corals variously homoeomorphic with favositids have been reclassified in the light of sclerosponge work. The Chaetetida, in whole or in part, are now widely considered to be sponges (Hartman and Goreau 1972; Fischer 1977; West and Clark 1984; Vacelet 1985; but see also Hill 1981) and some have yielded unquestionable spicules (Died et al. 1977; Gray 1981). However, Sokolov (1962) had already argued strongly against the inclusion of this group in the Tabulata before the new sclerosponge discoveries. In addition, a reassessment of Nodulipora and Desmidopora, formerly classified as Favositidae (Hill and Stumm 1956), has established a good case for their transfer to the sclerosponges (Hartman and Goreau 1975; Stel and Oekentorp 1981). It is possible that some further tabulate taxa may also eventually require reassignment, but generally it is considered less likely that tabulates other than favositids could be sponges (Hartman and Goreau 1975; Scrutton 1979), although transfer of the whole group to the Porifera has been proposed (Stel and de Coo 1977). The definition of the Tabulata taken here is that outlined by Scrutton (1984), who argued that the subclass essentially constitutes a monophyletic grouping. In this paper, discussion is limited to Favosites and its close relatives, collectively and informally termed favositids and equiva- lent in general terms to the Favositina of Hill ( 1981 ). The sclerosponges are now considered to be a polyphyletic collection of various demosponges (Vacelet 1977, 1985). They are united only by the possession of a massive ‘coralline’ basal skeleton which in itself seems to be of little phylogenetic significance. Indeed, the basal skeleton in different sponges shows a wide range in macroscopic form, microstructure, and mineralogy. The term sclerosponge is retained here informally, as the group collectively represents the most coral-like representatives of the sponges. It includes the Tabulospongida of Hartman and Goreau (1975) IPalaeontology, Vol. 30, Part 3, 1987, pp. 485-492.) © The Palaeontological Association 486 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TEXT-FIG. I. Comparison of basic morphology and characteristic corallite/calicle size in a favositid and a sclerosponge, in transverse and longitudinal sections, a, b, Favosites multipora Lonsdale, BM(NH) R51936; Silurian, Wenlock Series, Much Wenlock Limestone; road cut on B4378, 2-5 km north-north-east of Much Wenlock, Shropshire, c, d, Tabulospongia japonica Mori, BM(NH) 1986:7;7:1a; Recent; Ishigaki-shima, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. All x 8. as well as the morphologically very similar Chaetetida and these two orders together represent the sclerosponges most closely homoeomorphic with favositids (text-fig. 1). ANALYSIS OF FAVOSITID STRUCTURE Favosites is a colonial organism consisting of closely appressed polygonal tubes interconnected by mural pores (text-fig. 1a, b). Conventionally, the skeletal tubes in favositids are called corallites (as in corals generally) whilst those in sclerosponges are calicles; it will be convenient to use these terms here although 1 do so without prejudice. In favositids, corallite ‘diameters’ vary from c. 0-5-5-0 mm, comparable to corallite size in many other tabulate corals and some scleractinian corals, although SCRUTTON: FAVOSITID AFFINITIES 487 TEXT-FIG. 2. Three different methods of origin of new units within a colony, a, b, lateral increase in favositids; the point of communication with the parent corallite is so small that the critical stage is seldom seen in random sections; for this reason, increase in favositids was earlier thought to be intermural increase, c, o, intramural increase in sclerosponges; the new calicle arises within the wall with no communication with surrounding calicles. e, f, longitudinal hssion in sclerosponges; an existing calicle is subdivided subec]ually by the growth and fusion of pseudosepta from opposite walls; occasionally, subdivision may be effected by a single pseudoseptum growing from one wall across the calicle. a, c, e are cross-sections, with an arrow indicating the critical stage of increase; b, d, f are ‘perfect’ longitudinal sections through the corresponding critical stages. to few rugose corals (most of which have larger corallites). Of the living sclerosponges so far known, none has calicle diameters in excess of 0-6 mm (text-fig. Ic, d), and those with the larger diameters have a functional relationship between the calicles and ostia in which the tissue enclosed by each calicle is the unit supported by a single ostium (Hartman and Goreau 1975). Meiiia, however, with very small calicles (01 2-0- 15 mm), has no such relationship. The fossil tabulosponges and the chaetetids have calicle diameters not exceeding c. 1-2 mm, with most in the range 01 5-0-50 mm, significantly smaller than the corallites in the majority of favositids. New corallites in Favosites are now known always to arise by lateral increase (Oliver 1968; Stel 1978; Scrutton 1979), equivalent to the peripheral intracalicular increase of Hill ( 1981 ) (text-fig. 2a, B). The process is structurally comparable with lateral increase in other corals. In sclerosponges, however, new calicles arise either by longitudinal fission or by apparently true intramural increase (Hartman and Goreau 1972, 1975) (text-fig. 2c-f). There appears to be no overlap between the two groups. The determination of original composition and microstructure in fossil material is a more debat- able area but the favositid skeleton was most probably originally calcitic (Richter 1972; Sandberg 1975). Corallite walls are considered to have had a fibronormal microstructure, although some argue that lamellar microstructure was primary in certain genera (Lafuste 1962). More critically. 488 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 there is no doubt that this fabric is based on an epithecal surface bounding individual corallites which is expressed as a median dense band when corallite walls are fused back to back (Oekentorp and Sorauf 1970; Schouppe and Oekentorp 1974; Stel 1978; Hill 1981) (text-fig. 3a-c). Precisely similar walls are known in cerioid rugose corals such as Actinocyathus, Hexagonaria, Lithostrotion, and many others (Hill 1981), as well as in other tabulate corals (Flower 1961). This indication of the individuality of the component corallites within the favositid colony is buttressed by two additional features. First, by the occurrence of subcerioid growth, in which irregular intercorallite cavities are formed within an otherwise cerioid morphology (Philip 1960). Secondly, by the manner of formation of pseudoperculae, plates with concentric growth lines, often with an excentric origin, that individually close off abandoned calices in some specimens (Dunbar 1927; Swann 1947). The presence of intermural spaces (Swann 1947; Ross 1953) would represent further evidence, although some structures so described are due to commensal organisms and others are at least enhanced diagenetically if not wholly of diagenetic origin (Oekentorp 1969). Even so, the distribution of the commensal structures themselves often follows a pattern related to the corallite walls which suggests that the latter defined individual units of soft tissue. Sclerosponges are mainly aragonitic with spherulitic or trabecular structure, although calcitic lamellar skeletons are known in tabulosponges (Hartman and Goreau 1972, 1975; Vacelet 1985) (text-fig. 3d, e). In neither, however, is there any indication of an axial zone in the wall representing fused epitheca, or of any individuality of the component calicles (Hartman and Goreau 1975). Intercalicular walls have a unitary microstructure. The ‘epitheca’ of sclerosponges (Hartman and Goreau 1972, 1975) is equivalent to the holotheca of non-cerioid tabulate and massive rugose corals (Hill 1981). In most, if not all, cerioid tabulates and rugosans the outer wall of the colony is the sum of the free epithecal walls of adjacent, peripheral corallites. The septal spines and tabulae of Favosites can be matched by both other corals and some sclerosponges in gross morphology and possibly microstructure, although if favositid septal spines are trabecular, as Hill (1981) speculated, then they are uniquely cnidarian (text-fig. 3c, e). Although favositid spines may be arranged in regular vertical rows and there may be twelve such rows, other configurations may occur and their distribution may also be irregular (Schouppe and Oekentorp 1974; Oekentorp 1976; Oekentorp and Stel 1985). A very similar range of variation appears to be possible in some sclerosponges. However, some favositids, the Agetolitidae, have unusually well- developed septa for which rugosan septal insertion has been claimed (Kim 1974), thus strongly supporting anthozoan affinities. The mural pores of favositids (text-figs. 2a, b, 3a, b) are structurally comparable with, and were presumably identical in function to, the horizontal tubules of syringoporoids. There is no difference between the appearance of syringoporoid intercommunication when the corallites become com- pressed and contiguous and the mural pores of favositids (see, for example. Hill 1981). Some other tabulate coral groups also possess mural pores of supposed similar function to those of favositids, if of different structure in detail, but pores are not present in all tabulate corals. No similar structures are known in living sclerosponges and the chaetetids, although they are present in the probable fossil sclerosponges Nodulipora and Desmidopora. Stel and Oekentorp (1981) suggested a relation- ship between the presence of pores and larger calicle size in sclerosponges, although they noted an exception to this themselves. Fliigel’s (1976) suggested analogy between mural pores in favositids and astrorhizal systems in sclerosponges is ingenious but unconvincing (Scrutton 1979; Stel and Oekentorp 1981 ). Mural pores are as equally unknown among rugose and scleractinian corals as among the bulk of sclerosponges. However, in favositids they can be interpreted most convincingly as a device allowing interpolypal communication and thus a higher level of integration of the colony than in unmodified cerioid morphologies (Coates and Oliver 1973). In other corals this is achieved by the wholesale loss of the epithecal barrier to integration, or by pervasively and finely perforate walls in some Scleractinia. It is clear, however, that the presence or absence of mural pores cannot be taken as a criterion of great significance in determining the affinity of the favositids. Neither favositids nor any other tabulate corals show any sign of astrorhizal structures like those SCRUTTON; FAVOSITID AFFINITIES 489 TEXT-FIG. 3. Microstructural characteristics of a favositid and a sclerosponge. a c, Favosites midtipora Lonsdale (specimen details as for text-fig. 1a, b). The dark mid-line of the wall, representing fused epithccae of adjacent corallites, and its fibro-normal coating is clear in a and c, and growth lines on the epithecal surface in section can be distinguished in b; mural pores are present in a and b and septal spines are sectioned (particularly top left) in c. D, E, Tahidospongia japonica Mori (specimen details as for text-fig. Ic, d). The skeleton is high-Mg calcite with lamellar microstructure, clearly seen in e; the undulose surfaces of the lamellae are responsible for the concentric patterns in the wall in cross-section d; calical spines arc well developed, formed of sharply peaked extensions of lamellar tissue, but spicules are not incorporated into the calcitic skeleton. All x 50. 490 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 of sclerosponges and stromatoporoids. As many sponges do not reflect the system of exhalant canals in their skeletons, this may not be particularly significant. However, the individuality of favositid corallites strongly argues against the former presence of continuously integrated tissue across the colony surface as in sponges. Under these circumstances, some skeletal reflection would be expected of a sponge-scale exhalant current system— hence Fliigel’s interpretation of mural pores (Fliigel 1976). Mural pore distribution, however, seems to have no pattern to it that would support such an interpretation. Indeed, Nodulipora may possess both astrorhizae and mural pores with no specific relationship between them (Stel and Oekentorp 1981 ). Turning now to recent developments: first, Kazmierczak (1984) has claimed the preservation of desma-like spicules in a Devonian Thanmopora. These are rare, approximately parallel-sided, irregularly branched structures preserved in the peripheral part of the skeleton in microgranular low-Mg calcite and lined with micrite. They do not have a convincing spicular morphology. Their appearance, location, and mode of occurrence, however, strongly suggests that they are endolithic borings (Oekentorp 1985; Finks 1986). No convincing records of spicules in favositids are known. On the other hand, this is not a strong argument in itself against sponge affinites as several sclerosponges, particularly tabulosponges (Hartman and Goreau 1975; Mori 1976, 1977), do not incorporate spicules into their calcareous skeletons (text-fig. 3d, e). The second recent development is the report by Copper (1985) of presumed polyps of cnidarian character preserved in Silurian Favosites from Anticosti Island. Six well-preserved colonies show small dome-like structures in the centres of calices, with axial pits surrounded by normally twelve concentrically wrinkled radiating segments. In the specimen figured, their development is strikingly wide and uniform. A possible diagenetic origin for the structures has been suggested by Oekentorp and Stel (1985); their reference to a Protrochiscolithus figured by Flower (1961, pis. 14 and 16) is misleading, however, as the polypoid appearance of the silicified surface in that case is a direct reflection of the septal structure of the genus. No such interpretation seems possible with Copper’s Favosites. Oliver (1986) tentatively suggested an origin related to pseudoperculae; this may be important in understanding how calcification might have occurred, but the ‘polyps’ are most unlike known pseudoperculae in detailed form and regularity. It is a remarkable case of preservation and one not easy to explain, but it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the structures seen are indeed the remains of polyps. The twelve tentacles of Copper’s favositid polyps are intriguing in view of the frequency with which twelvefold septal distributions occur in tabulates (taken here to include the heliolitids: Hill 1981; Scrutton 1979, 1984). However, septal layouts and patterns of insertion in tabulates require further study (Oliver 1986) and it is premature at the moment to set aside the Tabulata as a group characterized by dodecal symmetry (Copper 1985; Oekentorp and Stel 1985). CONCLUSIONS There appears to be no single item of evidence in favour of the favositids being sponges, other than a very gross morphological similarity with the tabulosponges. Mural pores and septal structures in favositids both show features more strongly related to other tabulates and to the Rugosa respect- ively, whilst neither in the broadest sense is exclusively cnidarian. On the other hand, corallite size, and particularly mode of increase and evidence of corallite individuality are all positive cnidarian features. The polyps described by Copper (1985) appear to represent one additional, if spectacular, item on the cnidarian side. The weight of evidence is strongly in favour of favositids being cnidarians and a subgroup of the monophyletic subclass Tabulata (as defined by Scrutton 1984). To maintain any claim for sponge affinities for these extinct organisms, not only must Copper’s polyps be explained away, but some new and convincing positive evidence must be forthcoming. Acknowledgements. I am grateful to Kei Mori (Tohoku University, Japan) for supplying me with a specimen of Tabulospongia japonica. I thank Bill Oliver (United States Geological Survey, Washington, DC) and Kevin Goodger (University of Newcastle upon Tyne) for helpful comments on the manuscript. SCRUTTON: FAVOSITID AFFINITIES 491 REFERENCES COATES, A. G. and OLIVER, w. A., JR. 1973. Coloniality in zoantharian corals. In boardman, r. s., cheetham, A. H. and OLIVER, w. A., JR. (eds.). Animal colonies, 3 27. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsbcrg, Pennsylvania. COPi’ER, p. 1985. Fossilized polyps in 430-Myr-old Favosites corals. Nature, Land. 316, 142 144. DiECi, G., RUSSO, A., RUSSO, E. and MARCHi, M. s. 1977. Occurrence of spicules in Triassic chaetetids and ceratoporellids. Boll. Soc. paleont. ital. 16, 229 238. DUNBAR, c. o. 1927. Pseudopcrcula in the tabulate coral Favosites. Am. J. Sci. 13, 101 114. FINKS, R. M. 1986. ‘Spicules’ in Thamnopora. Fossil Cnidaria, 15 ( 1 .2), 22. FISCHER, j.-c. 1977. Biogeographie des Chaetetida et des Tabulospongida post-paleozoi'ques. Minn. Bur. Reel), geol. minier. 89, 530 534. FLOWER, R. H. 1961. Montoya and related colonial corals. Mem. Inst. Min. Technol. New Mex. 7, I 97. FLUGEL, H. w. 1976. Ein Spongienmodell fiir die Favositidae. Letliaia, 9, 405 419. GRAY, D. I. 1981. Spicule pseudomorphs in a new Palaeozoic chaetetid, and its sclerosponge affinities. Palaeon- tology, 23, 803-820. HARTMAN, w. D. and GOREAU, T. F. 1972. Ceratoporellc) (Porifera; Sclerospongiae) and the chaetetid ‘corals’. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 44, 133 148. 1975. A Pacific tabulate sponge, living representative of a new order of sclerosponges. Postilla, 167, 1 13. HILL, D. 1981. Rugosa and Tabulata. In teichert, c. (ed.). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part F (Suppl. 1) , xl + 762 pp. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas. and STUMM, e. c. 1956. Tabulata. In moore, r. c. (ed.). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part F, 444 477. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, New York and Lawrence, Kansas. KAZMiERCZAK, J. 1984. Favositid tabulates: evidence for poriferan affinity. Science, 225, 835-837. KIM, A. I. 1974. O filogenii i polozhenii v sisteme nekotorykh tabulyatomorfnykh korallov. In sokolov, b. s. (ed.). Drevnie Cnidaria, 1, 118 122. Nauka, Moscow. [In Russian.] KIRKPATRICK, R. 1912. On the nature of stromatoporoids. Natio-e, Fond. 89, 607. LAFUSTE, J. 1962. Note preliminaire sur la microstructure de la muraille chez Favosites Lamarck (Coelenterata, Tabulata). C. somni. Seanc. Soc. geol. Fr. 1962, 105 106. MORI, K. 1976. A new recent sclerosponge from Ngargol, Palau Islands and its fossil relatives. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., 2nd ser. (Geol.), 46, 1 9. 1977. A calcitic sclerosponge from the Ishigaki-shima coast, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Ibid. 47, I 5. oekentorp, k. 1969. Kommensalismus bei Favositiden. Miinst. Forseb. Geol. Paldont. 12, 165-216. 1976. Beschreibung und Systematik devonischer Favositidae asturiens und Betrachtungen zur Biogeogra- phie nord-spanischer Korallenfaunen. Ibid. 37, 1 129. 1985. Spicules in favositid Tabulata— remarks to J. Kazmierezak’s interpretation. Fossil Cnidaria, 14 (1), 34-35. and SORAUF, j. e. 1970. Uber Wandporen bei Favosites (Fav.) gothlandiciis Lamarck, 1816 (Coelenterata, Tabulata). Neues Jb. Geol. Paldont. Abb. 134, 283 298. and STEL, J. H. 1985. Favosites—a. true coral. Remarks to P. Copper’s discoveries of fossilized polyps. Fossil Cnidaria, 14 (2), 28-29. OLIVER, w. A., JR. 1968. Some aspects of colony development in corals. J. Paleont. 42 (5) (Paleont. Soc. Mem. 2) , 16-34. 1979. Review: Sponges they are not. Paleobiology, 5, 188 -190. — - 1986. Favositids are corals— further remarks. Fossil Cnidaria, 15(1 .2), 19 21 . PHILIP, G. M. 1960. The Middle Palaeozoic squamulate favositids of Victoria. Palaeontology, 3, 186 207. RICHTER, D. K. 1972. Autliigenic quartz preserving skeletal material. Sedimentology, 19, 21 1 218. ROSS, M. H. 1953. The Favositidae of the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian of New York). Bidl. Buffalo Soc. nat. Sci. 21, 37-89. SANDBERG, p. A. 1975. Bryozoan diagenesis: bearing on the nature of the original skeleton of rugose corals. ./. Paleont. 49, 587-606. SCHOUPPE, A. von and oekentorp, k. 1974. Morphogenese und Bau der Tabulata unter besonderer Beriicksich- tigung der Favositida. Palaeontograpbica, A145, 79 194. SCRUTTON, c. T. 1979. Early fossil cnidarians. In house, m. r. (ed.). Tbe origin of major invertebrate groups, 161-207. Academic Press, London and New York. 492 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 SCRUTTON, c. T. 1984. Origin and early evolution of tabulate corals. Palaeontogr. am. 54, 1 10-1 18. SOKOLOV, B. s. 1962. Gruppa Chaetetida. In orlov, u. a. (ed.). Osnovy paleontologii, 2. Guhki, Arkheotsiaty, Kishecimopolostnye, Chervy, 169-176. IzdateFstvo Akademii Nauk, Moscow. [In Russian.] STEL, j. H. 1978. Studies on the palaeohiology of favositids, viii + 247 pp. Stabo-All Round B. V., Groningen. and DE coo, j. c. m. 1977. The Silurian Upper Burgsvik and Lower Hamra-Sundre Beds, Gotland. Scripta Geol. 44, 1-43. and OEKENTORP, K. 1981. Desmidopora and Nodidipora: misfits in the coral world. Acta palaeont. pol. 25, SWANN, D. H. 1947. The Favosites alpenensis lineage in the Middle Devonian Traverse Group of Michigan. Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich. 6, 235-318. VACELET, J. 1977. Eponges Pharetronides actuelles et Sclerosponges de Polynesie fran^aise, de Madagascar et de la Reunion. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat. Paris (3^ ser.), 444, Zool. 307, 345-368. 1985. Coralline sponges and the evolution of the Porifera. In conway morris, s., george, j. d., gibson, R. and PLATT, H. M. (eds.). The origin and relationships of lower invertebrates, 113. Clarendon Press, Oxford. WEST, R. R. and clark, g. r., ii. 1984. Palaeohiology and biological affinities of Palaeozoic chaetetids. Palaeontogr. am. 54, 337-348. 403-417. Typescript received 28 April 1986 Revised typescript received 22 August 1986 COLIN T. SCRUTTON Department of Geology The University Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU A STAURIKOSAURID DINOSAUR FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC I SCH IGU AL ASTO FORMATION OF ARGENTINA AND THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STAURIKOSAURIDAE by D. B. BRINKMAN Ciud H.-D. SUES Abstract. A partial skeleton of a staurikosaurid, cf. Staurikosaums sp. is described from the Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina. This specimen provides additional anatomical data for an evaluation of the phylo- genetic affinities of the Staurikosauridae. Colbert’s (1970) assignment of Stawikosaurus to the Dinosauria is supported. No synapomorphies exist to support close relationships between Herrerasaurus and Stanrikosaurus. It is concluded that Stawikosaurus and Herrerasaurus form successive sister taxa to an assemblage composed of Ornithischia and Saurischia, with the latter only including Sauropodomorpha and Theropoda. The early diversification of the Dinosauria is documented virtually exclusively by skeletal remains from a sequence of Late Triassic continental strata in South America (Bonaparte 1978). The oldest known dinosaurs occur in the Santa Maria Formation of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, which is most likely Carnian in age (Colbert 1970). Slaurikosaurus Colbert, 1970 is the best known of these forms (Colbert 1970; Galton 1977) and is documented by lower jaws and a fairly complete postcranial skeleton (MCZ 1669). Spondylosoma Huene, 1942 from the same formation is very poorly known but has also been classified as dinosaurian (Huene 1942; Bonaparte 1978). The holotype material consists of vertebrae, parts of both scapulae, the proximal end of a left humerus, the proximal end of a right femur, and a partial right pubis and is currently being redescribed by Galton (pers. comm.). The Ischigualasto Formation of north-western Argentina, which is probably slightly younger than the Santa Maria Formation, has yielded material referable to three genera of dinosaurs (Bonaparte 1978). Of these, Herrerasaurus and Ischisaurus, first described by Reig (1963), are generally classified as primitive saurischians, and Pisanosaurus Casamiquela, 1967 is referred to the Ornithischia. Reig (1963) also described 'Triassolestes' {Trialestes Bonaparte, 1982) as a podokesaurid theropod but Bonaparte (1978, 1982) has reinterpreted this taxon as a crocodylomorph archosaur. The material referable to Herrerasaurus and Ischisaurus has only been described in a most preliminary fashion. Pisanosaurus is based on an extremely poorly preserved specimen, and Bonaparte’s (1976) assign- ment of this genus to the Heterodontosauridae (which are otherwise only definitely known from the Lower Jurassic of southern Africa) is indeed questionable. In this paper we describe a single fragmentary skeleton of a primitive dinosaur, which we interpret as the first record of a staurikosaurid from the Ischigualasto Formation. This specimen provides much additional information on the structure of these dinosaurs, and, based on these new data, the phylogenetic position of Stawikosaurus and related forms will be reconsidered. The occurrence of a staurikosaurid in the Ischigualasto Formation is documented by a single specimen in the collections of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University, MCZ 7064. It consists of a partial postcranial skeleton including the atlas-axis complex, parts of at least five dorsal vertebrae, fragments of both scapulocoracoids, proximal and distal ends of both humeri, a partial left ilium, the proximal ends of both ischia, the distal end of a right femur, the proximal and distal ends of a right tibia, the proximal end of a right fibula, and some pedal phalanges. The (Palaeontology, Vol. 30, Part 3, 1987, pp. 493-503.| © The Palaeontological Association 494 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 E TEXT-FIG. 1. Cf. Staurikosaiirus sp., MCZ 7064. a, b, atlas centrum, atlas intercentrum, and axis, in a, right lateral and b, dorsal view, c-e, centrum of a posterior dorsal vertebra, in c, anterior, d, lateral, and e, dorsal view. Abbreviations: f.ic.l— facet for atlas intercentrum, n.s — neural spine of axis, od — odontoid process. material was collected by A. S. Romer in 1958 from a site 1 km north-west of Arroyo de Agua, San Juan province, Argentina. In the field-notes, the specimen (field-number 295-58M) is recorded as much of an indeterminate skeleton. Some of the preserved pieces still show evidence of articular context: the tibia and fibula are preserved in articulation and the left humerus is in contact with the left scapulocoracoid. Thus the material probably represents the remains of a single skeleton. A nearly complete skull of a large archosaur, MCZ 7063, was possibly originally part of the same specimen but regrettably all direct information bearing on this appears to have been lost. The skull is definitely not referable to the rauisuchid Saurosiichus from the same formation (Bonaparte 1978), but determination of its affinities must await further preparation. Many of the bones were covered by hematite, the removal of which is extremely laborious. DESCRIPTION Subdivision archosauria DINOSAURIA Family staurikosauridae cf. Staurikosaurus sp. Postcrcmial axial skeleton. The postcranial axial skeleton is documented by the atlas-axis complex and parts of at least five dorsal vertebrae. The atlas centrum, axis intercentrum, and axis are preserved in association (text-fig. 1) but it is uncertain whether they are fused or whether their contacts are merely obscured by adhering hematite. BRINKMAN AND SUES: STAURIKOSAURID DINOSAUR 495 The atlas centrum bears a prominent odontoid proeess (od, text-fig. 1a, b). Its height is about half that of the axis centrum. Below the atlas centrum, the anterior face of the axis intercentrum forms a crescent-shaped surface for the atlas intercentrum (f.ic.l). The axis is elongate, the length of its centrum being about twice its height. The neural arch bears a large posteriorly directed spine (n.s). The neural spine is bifurcated at its apex, with each branch extending to the posterior extremity of a postzygapophysis. Transverse processes are absent. The sides of the axis centrum are pinched in at a point just about mid-height; the ventral edge of the centrum is rounded. The posterior articular face of the centrum is concave. One dorsal centrum is nearly complete (text-fig. 1c-e). It is short, slightly more than half as long as it is high (text. -fig. Id), and probably represents a posterior dorsal. Its articular ends are nearly flat, although the posterior face shows a slight central depression. The floor of the neural canal on broken centra narrows toward the eentre where it sinks deeply into the centrum (text-fig. 1e), rather than extending continuously on level with the pedicles of the neural arch. A similar inward extension TEXT-FIG. 2. Cf. Stawikosawus sp., MCZ 7064. Conjoined right scapula and coracoid in lateral view. Abbreviation: gl.c — glenoid cavity. V 496 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 of the floor has elsewhere only been reported in dorsal vertebrae of the theropod Dilophosaurus (Welles 1984); the distribution of this peculiar feature among other archosaurian groups remains to be determined. Appendicular skeleton. The scapula and coracoid form a single element but the line of fusion between the two bones remains apparent. The scapulocoracoids are documented by the left scapula and TEXT-FIG. 3. Cf. Stawikosaums sp., MCZ 7064. a, b, proximal end of right humerus in a, medial and b, anterior views; c, d, distal end of left humerus in c, medial and d, anterior views. Abbreviations: dp.c— delto-pectoral crest, h— proximal articular head. BRINKMAN AND SUES: STAURIKOSAURID DINOSAUR 497 anterior half of the conjoined coracoid and a nearly complete right coracoid, and the base of the attached scapula. The scapulocoracoid is characterized by a very slender scapular blade and a large, plate-like coracoid (text-fig. 2). The basal portion of the scapulocoracoid is rectangular in outline and bears the glenoid posteriorly. The scapular blade is narrow anteroposteriorly and is oval in transverse section. Although its dorsal margin is not preserved there are no indications for an expansion of the dorsal (vertebral) end. The humerus (text-fig. 3) is represented by the proximal and distal ends of both elements. Its overall length cannot be determined. The articular ends are two-and-a-half times as wide as the humeral shaft. The humeral head (h, text-fig. 3a) is hemispherical and is restricted to the centre of the proximal end of the bone. The deltopectoral crest (dp.c) is prominent and arises slightly distal to the proximal articular end. It extends more or less perpendicular to the long axis of the proximal portion of the humerus (text-fig. 3b). The humeral shaft is circular in transverse section distal to the deltopectoral crest. The distal articular end of the humerus bears distinct radial and ulnar condyles. The radial condyle faces distinctly ventrally. The ulnar condyle is situated distal to it and faces primarily distally. The ectepicondyle has a notch of uncertain significance in its lateral margin. The partial left ilium (text-fig. 4c) includes the supra-acetabular rim and the pubic ramus. The TEXT-FIG. 4. Cf. Stawikosaunis sp., MCZ 7064. a, b, partial right ischium in A, lateral and b, proximal end view, c, partial left ilium in lateral view. Abbreviations: ac— acetabular wall, f.pu— articular facet for pubis. 498 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 supra-acetabular rim is prominent. It is concave ventrally, forming a socket for the reception of the proximal head of the femur. The lateral aspect of the iliac blade lacks the strong vertical buttress extending dorsally from the supraacetabular rim present in certain rauisuchians (Chatterjee 1985). The well-developed medial wall of the acetabulum (ac) extends far ventrally and forms a knife-like edge at about the level of the articular contact for the pubis (f.pu). While the acetabulum probably was perforated, the opening was quite small. The pubic peduncle of the ilium is robust and large. The proximal ends of both ischia are preserved. The ischium has a broad, triangular proximal TEXT-FIG. 5. Cf. Staurikosaurus sp., MCZ 7064. Distal end of right femur in a, posterior, B, anterior, and c, distal end view. Abbreviations: l.c— lateral condyle, m.c— medial condyle. BRINKMAN AND SUES: ST AU R I KOS AU R I D DINOSAUR 499 TEXT-FIG. 6. Cf. Staurikosciunis sp., MCZ 7064. Partial right tibia and fibula. A, B, articulated proximal portions of tibia and fibula in a, anterior and b, proximal end view, c, d, distal end of tibia in c, anteromedial and d, distal end view. portion and a rod-like distal region (text-fig. 4a, b). The articular surfaces for the ilium and pubis are separated only by a slight narrowing of the bone, with that for the former being larger and situated at a low angle relative to the latter. The femur is documented by the distal end of the right bone (text-fig. 5). The diameter of the femoral shaft increases toward the distal articular end. At the proximal end of the preserved fragment, the diameter of the shaft is slightly more than half the width across the distal end. This increase in width is developed asymmetrically so that the medial portion of the distal end is more prominent than the lateral one (text-fig. 5a, b). The distal end of the femur is rounded in outline. It bears a central depression, which is surrounded in front and on either side by a low, broad ridge (text-fig. 5c). A smaller depression is developed anterior to the central one. The distal condyles (l.c, m.c, text-fig. 5a) occupy subterminal positions on the posterior (ventral) aspect of the femur. Both the proximal and distal ends of the right tibia are preserved. It has an expanded proximal portion that rapidly becomes narrow distally (text-fig. 6a). A distinct cnemial crest, laterally bor- dered by a groove, is developed. The proximal portion of the right fibula (text-fig. 6a, b) is preserved in its original articular context. It has a broad semilunate proximal end, which fits tightly against the lateral aspect of the tibia. Together the two bones form a rounded articular surface. The distal end of the tibia (text-fig. 6c, d) is rounded in articular view and is much smaller in diameter than the proximal end. Its articular surface has a helical shape with the two ends of the spiral joined by 500 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 a flat surface. The difference in the relative position of the two ends of the spiral produces a notch for the reception of the ascending process of the astragalus. No tarsal bones are preserved. The pedal digits are only documented by a few non-diagnostic articular ends of phalanges. TAXONOMIC AFFINITIES OF MCZ 7064 MCZ 7064 is identified as a staurikosaurid, rather than as a herrerasaurid, based on the structure of the ischium and of the distal end of the tibia. The triangular proximal end of the ischium matches that of Staurikosaurus pricei (MCZ 1669) closely and differs from that of Herrerasaurus, which shows a distinct angulation between the posterior margin of the ischiadic shaft and the posterior edge of the acetabular portion (Reig 1963, fig. 2). The outline of the distal end of the tibia is again closely similar to that of S. pricei (Galton 1977, fig. 2m) and different from that in Herrerasaurus where the distal end is more expanded (Reig 1963, fig. 3b, c). The distal ends of both tibiae in the holotype of S. pricei have a deep groove extending proximally from the notch formed by the helical articular surface but this feature has been exaggerated by overpreparation; the distal end of the right tibia in MCZ 7064 has no comparable distal groove. Direct comparison of MCZ 7064 with the type specimens of Spondylosoma ahscomUtum and /. cattoi was not possible. The former differs from Staurikosaurus pricei in the development of the pubic apron (Galton, pers. comm.) as well as in the structure of the vertebrae (Colbert 1970). Staurikosaurus differs from I. cattoi, currently being restudied by F. Novas, in the presence of a low lesser trochanter on the proximolateral aspect of the femur (Galton 1977). In both Ischisaurus and Herrerasaurus the lesser trochanter forms a small but very prominent ridge in a more distal position on the proximolateral aspect of the femur (Novas, pers. comm.). Considering its slightly later occurrence in time and the possible structural differences to the holotype of S. pricei, specimen MCZ 7064 is tentatively identified as cf. Staurikosaurus sp. DISCUSSION The new data on skeletal structure provided by MCZ 7064 invite examination of the phylogenetic position of the Staurikosauridae relative to dinosaurs and other archosaurs. Outgroups used in determining the polarity of character states displayed by Staurikosaurus were Lagosuchidae (Bon- aparte 1975r/), Ornithosuchidae (Walker 1964; Bonaparte 19756), and Rauisuchia ( = Rauisuchidae -f Poposauridae; Chatterjee 1985). These extensive comparisons with non-dinosaurian archosaurs were undertaken because of the current debate about which group of archosaurs is most closely related to the Dinosauria. We regard Dinosauria as a monophyletic assemblage, following the recent discussions by Benton (1984) and Gauthier and Padian (1985), rather than as an artificial grouping comprising two distinct orders Ornithischia and Saurischia, which supposedly have inde- pendent, possibly multiple origins among Thecodontian’ archosaurs (Charig 1982). The first problem to be considered is the placement of Staurikosaurus in the taxon Dinosauria. Colbert (1970) listed seven characters in support of his assignment of this genus to the Dinosauria: ( 1 ) transverse processes supported by a pair of strong ventral buttresses; (2) acetabulum perforated; (3) ischium rod-like; (4) ilium as deep as long and truncated posteriorly; (5) femur shorter than tibia; (6) proximal head of femur set off from shaft; (7) fourth trochanter on femur strongly developed. Since the publication of Colbert’s original description of Staurikosaurus much new material of early Mesozoic non-dinosaurian archosaurs has been described, including forms that share some of the character-states enumerated by Colbert. Characters ( 1 ) and (3) are also developed in the poposaurid rauisuchian Postosuchus (Chatterjee 1985). Lagosuchus shares characters (5) and (7) with dinosaurs BRINKMAN AND SUES: STAU RI KOS A U RI D DINOSAUR 501 (Bonaparte 1975o). Characters (5) and (6) are present in pterosaurs (Wellnhofer 1978; Padian 1983). The size of the acetabular opening is uncertain in MCZ 7064, and the opening (2) may not have been much larger than that in certain Ornithosuchidae (Walker 1964; Bonaparte 19756) and in Postosuchus (Chatterjee 1985). Character (4) is possibly autapomorphous for Staurikosciurus, par- ticularly the marked posterior truncation of the iliac blade. None of the above characters are unique to dinosaurs. In the asymmetrical development of the distal articular end of the femur, Staurikosaurus resembles both other dinosaurs and Lagosiicinis. In most more primitive archosaurs the distal end is also asymmetrical but the lateral portion is more prominent. This structural difference can be related to a difference in the function of the femur; the femur extends laterally during femoral retraction in primitive archosaurs (Brinkman 1980). Gauthier and Padian (1985, p. 189) hypothesized the following set of synapomorphies in a common ancestor of Dinosauria (= Sauropodomorpha + Theropoda and Ornithischia): (1) Manus with phalangeal formula 2-3-4-3-2 (reduction in outer digits); (2) semiperforate acetabulum; (3) prominent supraacetabular buttress {supraacetabular rim in our usage); (4) fossa on ventral margin of postacetabular portion of ilium (for origin of M. caudifemoralis brevis); (5) prominent anterior (or lesser) trochanter of femur; (6) prominent cnemial crest on tibia, projecting beyond femoral condyles and curving anterolater- ally; (7) tibia in which proximal end is expanded anteroposteriorly and in which distal end is broadened transversely (‘twisted’ tibia), with notch in distal end for reception of ascending process. In addition, Gauthier and Padian note the existence of ‘several other synapomorphies’ but these were not specified in their paper and cannot be critically evaluated. Of these features, Staurikosaurus shares (2) to (4) and (6). The presence of character (I) cannot be determined. Character (5) is found in Herrerasaurus but the feature is apparently developed in a rather different fashion in Staurikosaurus. Staurikosaurus lacks tibial twisting, representing the plesiomorphous condition, but has a notch in the distal end of the tibia for the reception of the ascending process of the astragalus. Thus character (7) actually consists of two independently acquired features and should be modified accordingly. Benton (1984, pp. 13-14) has presented a list of possible synapomorphies for a monophyletic assemblage Dinosauria, which, in addition to characters (5) and (7) listed by Gauthier and Padian, includes the following features: (1) Absence of postfrontal; (2) deltopectoral crest extending far down along humeral shaft; (3) forelimb about half as long as hindlimb; (4) reduced contact between pubis and ischium; (5) fourth trochanter prominent and positioned low on femur; (6) proximal head of femur set off from shaft; (7) reduced, roller-like astragalus with ascending process; (8) calcaneum reduced or absent; (9) advanced mesotarsal ankle joint; (10) pedal digits II to IV bundled, elongate, and subequal in length; (11) pedal digits I and V reduced and divergent; (12) foot with digitigrade pose. Characters (8), (10), and (1 1) of this list are also found in Lagosuchus (Bonaparte 1975a); metatarsal II in Lagosuchus is but slightly shorter than are metatarsals III and IV. characters (1), (3), (6), part of (7), (8), (9), part of (10) and (12) are shared by pterosaurs (Wellnhofer 1978; Padian 1983). Characters (1), (3), and (7) to (12) cannot be determined in the presently available staurikosaurid material but characters (2), (4), (5), and (6) are developed in Staurikosaurus. 502 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 We support Colbert’s assignment of Staurikosaunis to the Dinosauria. Like Herrerasaurus, Staurikosaurus occupies a basal position within this group as defined by recent authors and is more primitive than other dinosaurs in the outline of the distal end of the tibia. Herrerasaunis also has a semiperforate acetabulum with a strongly developed medial wall but is more derived in the transverse expansion of the distal end of the tibia (Reig 1963; Benedetto 1973). The markedly anteroposteriorly expanded distal end of the pubis is probably an autapomorphy for this genus. This feature is also developed, to a lesser extent, in S. pricek in the podokesaurid theropod Coelophysis the pubis terminates distally in a knob-like thickening (Colbert 1970). Staurikosaurus and Herrerasaurus were placed in a single family Herrerasauridae by Benedetto (1973) who noted numerous similarities between them. Galton (1977), emphasizing certain differ- ences between these two genera, proposed a separate family Staurikosauridae for the reception of Staurikosaurus but left the question of their interrelationships unresolved. With the possible excep- tion of the anteroposterior expansion of the distal end of the pubis, we find no synapomorphies in support of a sister-group relationship between Herrerasaurus and Staurikosaurus and regard the similarities between the two taxa as plesiomorphous. Only one feature of Staurikosaurus, the presence of a narrow scapular blade, is an apparent autapomorphy for this genus. Judging from outgroup comparisons (particularly with Lagosuchus; Bonaparte 1975u) and the condition in most early dinosaurs including prosauropods and Coelophysis, a wide scapular blade is primitive for Dinosauria. According to Reig’s (1963, pp. 6-8) list of skeletal material for Herrerasaurus, the scapula in this form is unknown. We hypothesize Staurikosaurus and Herrerasaurus as successive of TEXT-FIG. 7. Hypothesis of interrelationships for Staurikosaurus, Herrerasaurus, and other Dino- sauria (Saurischia only including Theropoda and Sauropodomorpha). Lagosuchus is included in the cladogram as an outgroup, following Bonaparte (1975n) and Gauthier and Padian (1985). Selected synapomorphies are: (1) neck sigmoidally curved. Three-regionalized’ vertebral column, femur with moderately developed lateral condyle, astragalus with ascending process, mesotarsal joint (Gauthier and Padian 1985); (2) semiperforate acetabulum with prominent supraacetabular rim, distinct lesser (anterior) trochanter on femur, distal end of tibia with fossa for reception of ascending process of astragalus (see text); (3) distal end of tibia transversely expanded (Twisted’ tibia); (4) medial wall to acetabulum less well developed, pedal digit V small. BRINKMAN AND SUES; STAURIKOSAU R1 D DINOSAUR 503 sister taxa to a clade Saurischia + Ornithischia as defined by Gauthier and Padian (1985) (text-fig. 7). Staiirikosaurus is clearly the most primitive known representative of the Dinosauria. Galton (1977) classified both Herrerasaunis and Staiirikosaurus as Saurischia iucertae seeks. We accept Gauthier and Padian's more restrictive use of the term ‘Saurischia’ to include only Theropoda and Sauropodomorpha (which, in fact, agrees with the traditional usage of that name) and suggest placement of the two primitive South American dinosaurs in separate and distinct higher taxa to reflect their respective phylogenetic positions. Acknowledgements. We thank P. M. Galton, University of Bridgeport, and F. Novas, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, for sharing unpublished information with us. K. Padian, University of California, and Greg Paul provided an insightful review of the manuscript. D. Sloan, Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, prepared text-figs. 2 6. REFERENCES BENEDETTO, J. L. 1973. Herrerasauridae, nueva familia de saurisquios Triasicos. Ameginniana, 10, 89-102. BENTON, M. J. 1984. Eossil reptiles from the German Late Triassic and the origin of dinosaurs. In reif, w.-e. and westphal, f. (eds.). Third Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems. Short Papers, 13 18. At- tempto Verlag, Tubingen. BONAPARTE, J. F. 1975fl. Nuevos materiales de Lagosuchus talampayensis Romer (Thecodontia— Pseudosuchia) y su significado en el origen de los Saurischia. Chanares inferior, Triasico medio de Argentina. Acta geol. lilloana, 13, 5-90. 1975/). The family Ornithosuchidae (Archosauria: Thecodontia). Ccdl. Internatn. C.N.R.S. 218, 485-502. 1976. Pisanosauriis mertii Casamiquela and the origin of the Ornithischia. J. Paleont. 50, 808 820. - 1978. El Mesozoico de America del Sur y sus tetrapodos. Op. lilloana, 26, 5-596. 1982. Faunal replacement in the Triassic of South America. J. vert. Paleont. 2, 362-371. BRINKMAN, D. 1980. The hind limb step cycle of Caiman sclerops and the mechanics of the crocodile tarsus and metatarsus. Can. J. Zool. 58, 2187 2200. CHARiG, A. J. 1982. Problems in dinosaur phylogeny: a reasoned approach to their attempted resolution. GOihios, Mhn. Spec. 6, 113- 126. CHATTERJEE, s. 1985. Postosuclius, d new thecodontian reptile from the Triassic of Texas and the origin of tyrannosaurs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B309, 395-460. COLBERT, E. H. 1970. A sauriscliian dinosaur from the Triassic of Brazil. Am. Mus. Novit. 2405, I 39. GALTON, p. M. 1977. On Stawiko.saunis pricei, an early saurischian dinosaur from the Triassic of Brazil, with notes on the Herrerasauridae and Poposauridae. Paldont. Z. 51, 234-245. GAUTHIER, J. and PADIAN, K. 1985. Phylogenetic, functional, and aerodynamic analyses of the origin of birds and their flight. In hecht, m. k., ostrom, j. h., viohl, g. and wellnhofer, p. (eds.). The beginnings of birds, 185 197. Freunde des Jura-Museums Eichstatt, Eichstatt. huene, f. V. 1935-1942. Die fossilen Reptilien des sikiamerikanischen Gondwanalandes. Ergebnisse der Saurier- grabungen in Siidbrasilien I928I29, viii -h 332 pp. C. H. Beck, Munich. (Archosauria are described in Lieferung 3, which was published in 1942.) PADIAN, K. 1983. Description and reconstruction of new material of Dimorphodon macronyx (Buckland) (Pterosauria, Rhamphorhynchoidea) in the Yale Peabody Museum. Postilla, 189, I 44. REIG, o. A. 1963. La presencia de dinosaurios saurisquios en los ‘Estratos de Ischigualasto’ (Mesotriasico Superior) de las provincias de San Juan y La Rioja (Republica Argentina). Ameginniana, 3, 3-20. WALKER, A. D. 1964. Triassic reptiles from the Elgin area; Ornithosuchus and the origin of carnosaurs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B248, 53- 1 34. WELLES, s. p. 1984. Dilophosaurus wetherilli (Dinosauria, Theropoda). Osteology and comparisons. Palaeonto- graphica, A185, 85 180. WELLNHOFER, p. 1978. Pteiosauria. In p. wellnhofer (ed.). Handbiich der Paldoherpetologie, Teil 19, x-t-82 pp. Gustav Eischer Verlag, Stuttgart. DONALD B. BRINKMAN Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Box 7500 Drumheller, Alberta TOJ OYO, Canada HANS-DIETER SUES Typescript received 10 June 1986 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University Revised typescript received 13 October 1986 Cambridge, MA 02138, USA iif’t k’;:' .J.'’/i|^/; •.. ■ 'V, .■.'■VJI^tm'tr'' M': ■ I ' ' ’'^ •• •■"■i’fd ■! "• ‘■■'i'¥®*'^i «> • ^ ■•■ f 2 ^ A v; » AV '-lfi*'"'* • .. V <>;■■ '■ ■^,i' . t .■('■ t; Lfj .u; , j" ; M i’ •*{iii'. '.. li .i.'.-. ' '■ " ' ‘■■' i •'" '■ : .;, V- . )■, rv " V t,.* ' ■ ".' »'■ .. .ft* in'-w -■•(■■■« *®„'^ ■■ harfi’^'i i‘<' * j) A CARIBBEAN RUDIST BIVALVE IN OMAN: ISLAND-HOPPING ACROSS THE PACIFIC IN THE LATE CRETACEOUS by p. w. SKELTON Cindy . p. wright Abstract. The hippuritid rudist bivalve Torreites is described from the Maastrichtian of Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Together with the single fragment from the region on which T. milovanovici Grubic, 1979 was based, the specimens are placed in a newly recognized geographical subspecies of T. sanchezi (Douville, 1927), a species previously considered endemic to the Caribbean Province. The Arabian T. s. milovanovici Grubic differs from its Caribbean parent, T. s. sanchezi (Douville) (incorporating all previously recognized T. sanchezi, as well as T. coxi Grubic, 1979) only in the angle (a) between the arete cardinale and the ventralmost pillar: a is 12°-75° in the former and 50°-126° in the latter. The loss of the normal hippuritid pore and canal system in Torreites is conhrmed and shown to have been associated with exposure of the mantle margins, which may have contained symbiotic algae, as in the living Tridacna. Homeomorphy and plate tectonic drifting are rejected as explanations for the apparent disjunct endemism of Torreites. Rather, larval dispersal along a corridor of shallow staging posts is favoured. A Mediterranean Tethys/Atlantic route is considered unlikely, because of barriers. There is good evidence, in contrast, for such staging posts across the Pacihc and eastern Tethys in Campanian Maastrichtian times. Although the distinctive Late Cretaceous rudist bivalve Torreites has generally been considered endemic to the Caribbean Province (Kauffman 1973), a single worn fragment of a right valve from Sheikdom Sharjah, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), was assigned to the genus by Grubic, in 1979. Such a strikingly disjunct distribution for a sessile benthic inhabitant of shallow equatorial seas demands a palaeobiogeographical explanation. Yet this and other purported cases of apparent disjunct endemism between the eastern Tethyan and Caribbean regions (e.g. Chubb 1956; Elliott 1981) have attracted surprisingly little comment in the literature. Possibly there has been a tacit (though uninformed) assumption that such distantly separated forms are more likely to have been mere homeomorphs than true congeners, or that the currently known localities are but preser- vational relics of an originally cosmopolitan range. During geological reconnaissance work in Oman (by V.P.W. in 1983) and in the UAE (by P.W.S. in 1984), we found several further, well-preserved specimens of Torreites. The purpose of this paper is to establish recognition of the genus in the region beyond any doubt, on the basis of a suite of characters, the replication of which by homeomorphy would have been exceedingly unlikely. The quality of our material also prompts a systematic re-evaluation of the new species of the genus erected for the Middle Eastern form by Grubic, and allows the reconstruction of some previously unrecognized aspects of the original soft part anatomy and life habits of the animal. Grubic (1979) inferred that the disjunct distribution of the genus implied closer proximity of Oman to the Caribbean in Late Cretaceous times. However, recent Deep Sea Drilling Project work in the Pacific (Schlanger et al. 1981) has shown that, in the Late Cretaceous, shallow-water benthos with Caribbean affinities extended far across the Pacific, exploiting shallow-water ‘stepping stones’ formed by numerous volcanic seamounts and islands. We argue here that the disjunct distribution of Torreites was more probably the product of larval dispersal via such staging posts than of the drifting apart of Oman and the Caribbean implied by the hypothesis of Grubic. {Palaeontology, Vol. 30, Part 3, 1987, pp. 505-529, pis. 61-62.| © The Palaeontological Association 506 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 GEOLOGICAL SETTING The main suite of specimens described here was collected from the foot of a small escarpment of Cretaceous strata east of the main Tertiary escarpment, some 30 km south-south-west of the Saiwan airfield, in eastern central Oman, at latitude 20° 39' N. and longitude 57° 31' E. (text-fig. I). The area is remote, with no previous published account of its Mesozoic geology, although a generalized geological map of the region is given by Gorin et al. (1982). The scarcity of landmarks and settlements makes it impossible to provide more precise locality details. The rudists were loose specimens from the talus at the foot of the escarpment. They are associated with a yellow-weathering bioclastic calcarenite. The Upper Cretaceous of the area comprises a basal clastic member overlain by a limestone member, which yields the rudists. Both members fall within the Aruma Group of Glennie (1977), of Santonian-Maastrichtian age. It is unclear as to whether the rudist-bearing limestone is high in the Fiqa Formation (a predominantly marly formation of Santonian-Maastrich- tian age) or if it corresponds to the Simsima Formation (Late Maastrichtian, according to Harris et ai 1984, though work in progress on this formation in the UAE by P.W.S. with S. C. Nolan, indicates, rather, an early to medial Maastrichtian age). The age of the Torreites-htdLx'xng units, however, must be considered tentative because of the lack of earlier work in the area. One further specimen was collected in Oman, at Filim in northern Masirah Bay (lat. 20° 36' N. and long. 58° 12' E.) (text-fig. 1 ). The specimens from the United Arab Emirates were found at two localities (text-fig. 1). A small hillock, Qarn Murrah, projecting through the desert sands some 8 km west of Jebel Faiyah, in eastern Sharjah (lat. 25° 07' N. and long. 55° 46' E.), has several specimens in life position, in a sequence of reddish bioclastic packstones to grainstones. To the south the basal chert conglomerate exposed around the core of an anticline at Jebel Huwayyah, some 10 km north-east of Buraimi/Al Ayn (lat. 24° 16' N. and long. 55° 48' E.), yielded a single worn right valve. In both cases, a TEXT-FIG. 1. Localities in Oman and the United Arab Emirates where the specimens of Torreites described in this paper have been collected and/or observed. SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 507 Maastrichtian age is indicated, by the accompanying large foraminifera, Orhitoides media (d’Arch- iac) and Omphalocyclus macroporus Lamarck, as well as by the hippuritid rudist Pironaea praesla- vonica Milovanovic, Sladic and Grubic, at Qarn Murrah, and by the large foraminifer, Lofiusia sp. in conformably overlying beds at Jebel Huwayyah. Work in progress by P.W.S., with S. C. Nolan, suggests that both occurrences may indeed be confined to the Lower Maastrichtian. Grubic (1979, p. 85) stated that his specimen came from ‘Guru Mileih, Sheikdom Sharjah’, and he assigned it a Maastrichtian age from its association with Orhitoides media and Omphalocyclus macroporus. The lithology of the matrix on this specimen is very similar to that observed at Qarn Murrah, however, and the specimen may indeed come from there (enquiries about the names of small hills in deserts often provokes confusing responses). SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY Superfamily HIPPURITACEA Gray, 1848 Family HIPPURITIDAE Gray, 1848 Genus TORREITES Palmer, 1933 Type Species. Hippurites (Vacciuites) Sanchezi Douville, 1927. Emended diagnosis. Medium to large-sized hippuritid, with a conical right valve (RV), and an operculiform left valve (LV) with a ventrally biased apex. The outer shell layer of the LV is externally smooth and devoid of pores and canals. It is also much thinner than that of the RV, the internal margin of which is thus exposed. Apically blind radial canals penetrate the inner shell layer of the LV. The RV exterior is radially ribbed, with three solid radial infoldings (text-fig. 2) comprising a dorsal ''arete cardinale' (Po) and two posterior pillars (Pi and Pi). The former has a rounded inner tip and extends much further inwards than either of the subequal pillars. The three infoldings tend to be uniformly thick, though the arOe cardinale may taper inwards. Their crests project through sinuses indented from the LV margin. They are positioned around an angle of arc of between 12 and 126°. The two teeth and posterior myophore of the LV are strongly projecting, and are arrayed at between 25 and 50° across the inner end of the arete cardinale. Remarks. The original description of the type species (Douville 1927) drew attention to the unusually elongate arete cardinale and to the even thicknesses of the pillars. Palmer’s (1933) original diagnosis for the genus noted most of the other key features: the imperforate outer layer of the LV; the radiating canals in the inner shell layer of the LV; and the sinuses in the LV for the RV infoldings. Rutten (1936) demonstrated that the canals in the inner shell layer of the LV open directly over the body cavity (in contrast to those in the outer shell layer of the LV in other hippuritids: see Skelton, 1976). He, MacGillavry (1937), Jung (1970), and Van Dommelen (1971 ) provided many quantitative data, including a higher range of values (75-120°) for the angle of arc formed by the RV infoldings in T. sanchezi than that observed (45-70°) in a smaller species, T. tschoppi MacGillavry. Grubic (1979) erected three new species, two based on previously described Caribbean specimens (T. coxi, based on specimen G. 14066 of Jung, 1970, and T. chuhbi, based on that described by Chubb, 1971 ) and the third, T. milovanovici, on the single RV fragment from Sharjah. This latter was distinguished by the very low angle of arc between Po and P2 — only ‘about 10°’. Our specimens from Oman and the UAE share the latter feature, but are otherwise so similar to T. sanchezi that we would judge them merely to represent a subspecific variant of that species (see the synonymy below). Stratigraphical ranges. In the Caribbean region the genus Torreites ranges from the Sanlonian or lowest Campanian to the Lower Maastrichtian. T. sanchezi is characteristically found in the "Barrettia Beds’, in Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Jamaica, with either or both of Barrettia monilifera Woodward and B. gigas Chubb (Van Dommelen, 1971, p. 34; though N. F. Sohl, pers. comm, of August 1983, refers more specifically to a consistent co-occurrence with the latter species). MacGillavry and his co-workers (summarized in MacGillavry 1937) favoured a Maastrichtian age for the Barrettia Beds, based largely on orbitoid foraminifera in those of the Cuban Habana Formation. In contrast, Hawkins (1924), working on Jamaican echinoids, and Muellerried 508 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 (1936), extrapolating from ammonite-bearing sequences in Chiapas, Mexico, postulated a Turonian age. Subsequent work has refuted the conclusions of Hawkins and Muellerried (N. F. Sohl, pers. comm.), and largely vindicated those of MacGillavry and his co-workers. B. monilifera is now judged to be of Late Campanian, and B. gigas, of latest Campanian/earliest Maastrichtian age (Sohl and Kollmann 1985, fig. 19). Dc la Torre et al. (1978) referred the Barrettia fauna of Cuba to the upper part of the Lower Maastrichtian. So the inferred range of T. sanchezi in the Caribbean is best bracketed within the Upper Campanian to Lower Maastrichtian interval. The specimen described by Chubb (1971) as "T. cf. sanchezi' (= T. chubbi Grubic, 1979), however, comes from the Peter’s Hill Limestone of Jamaica, now considered of latest Santonian to earliest Campanian age (N. F. Sohl, pers. comm.). T. tschoppi was considered ‘probably Upper Campanian’ by MacGillavry (1937, p. 20), though Van Dom- melen (1971, text-fig. 18) extended its range into the Santonian, albeit with uncertainty. It is certainly older than T. sanchezi (Van Dommelen, 1971; N. F. Sohl, pers. comm.). The specimens from the UAE are all considered Maastrichtian, while those from Oman can probably be assigned to that stage, too, though with less certainty (see. p. 506). Characters of systematic value. Text-fig. 2 shows the characters measured and the abbreviations used for them in the description of specimens that follows. The five main characters of systematic value are: 1. the overall size of the shell (L, Di and D2); 2. the angle of arc between the arete cardinale and the ventralmost pillar (a); 3. the lengths (I) and widths (w) of the arete cardinale (Pq) and pillars (Pi and P2); 4. the angle made by the myocardinal array with the inner tip of the arete cardinale (jiy, 5. the character of the RV outer shell layer (its thickness, rib-width, and depth of intervening grooves between ribs). The symbols used alongside the synonymy list are as explained in Matthews (1973). Torreites sanchezi (Douville) Plate 61, figs. 1-5; Plate 62, figs. 1 -4 *1927 Hippurites ( Vaccinites) Sanchezi Douville, p. 54, pi. 4, fig. 1. 1933 Torreites sanchezi Douville; Palmer, p. 100, pi. 7, figs. 1 and 2; pi. 8, figs. 1 and 2. 1936 Torreites sanchezi (Douville); Rutten, p. 135, text-fig. 4g. 1937 Torreites sanchezi (Douville); Vermunt, p. 269 (description only). 1937 Torreites sanchezi (Douville); MacGillavry, p. 128, pi. 5, fig. 4e-h. 1970 Torreites sanchezi (H. Douville); Jung, p. 5, pis. 1-3, text-figs. 1 and 2. 1971 Torreites sanchezi (Douville); Van Dommelen, p. 34, table 5. V. 1979 Torreites milovanovici Grubic, p. 84, pis. 1 and 2; text-fig. 4. 1979 Torreites coxi Grubic, p. 86, text-figs. 5 and 6 [text-fig. 5=7’. sanchezi (H. Douville); Jung, 1970, pi. 3]. Emended diagnosis. Large species of Torreites: D may exceed 100 mm and L, 200 mm. Ventral flank of RV flattened, even embayed, and separated from somewhat flattened anterior part by a blunt Carina. Outer shell layer of RV very thick (5-10 mm), and marked externally by deeply indented radial grooves separated by broad rounded ribs usually over 5 mm wide. These indentations correspond to salient ridges on the inner margin of the valve, and are present along the three infoldings of the RV wall, as well as around its periphery. The outer shell layer of the LV is only about 1 mm thick, and its marginal growth laminations are recurved over at least the peripheral parts of the valve’s outer surface. The arete cardinale and pillars are spaced around an arc (a) of 12-126°. Arete cardinale much longer than the subequal pillars (of which Pi tends to be the longer). Holotype. Hippurites ( Vaccinites) Sanchezi Douville, 1927, p. 54, pi. 4, fig. 1. Material studied. Five full-sized specimens were collected by V.P.W. some 30 km south-south-west of the Saiwan airfield, eastern central Oman, in 1983 (see p. 506), and have been deposited in the British Museum (Natural History) (nos. BMNH LL 28000-28004). One further specimen (P.W.S. Collection, no. 84/x.l) was collected by V.P.W. from Filim (north Masirah Bay), in 1983. All are well preserved, though with some patchy SKELTON AND WRIGHT; ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 509 TEXT-FIG. 2. Diagrams showing the morphology and measured characters of Torreites sandiezi. A, RV interior. Abbreviations are: am, anterior adductor muscle scar; ats, anterior tooth socket; be, body cavity; Pq arete cardinale\ Pi and P2, the two pillars (infoldings of the RV outer shell layer); pms, socket for the LV posterior myophore; pts, posterior tooth socket, b, as in a, showing measured characters. Abbreviations are: a, angle of arc described by lines drawn through the middles of Pq and P2; P, angle of arc described by lines drawn through Po and the myocardinal array (using the black dots centred on the sockets shown in a); Di, commissu- ral diameter parallel to Pq; D2, commissural diameter normal to Po; IP, pillar length; wP, pillar width, c, outline of both valves. Abbreviations are: L, RV length, measured along the external trace of Po; Iv, left valve; rv, right valve. silicification of the outer (calcitic) shell layer, and with the inner shell layers (originally aragonitic) now replaced by calcite spar. Four the the specimens have all or part of both valves preserved, while the remaining two (BMNH LL 28003 and 28004) are RVs only, though the latter also has a fragment of another, juvenile RV attached to its flank. A slightly worn RV was recovered by P.W.S., in 1984, from the basal chert pebble and shell rubble conglomerate underlying the Simsima Formation at Jebel Huwayyah, near A1 Ayn, UAE (see p. 506) (P.W.S. Collection, no. 84/32.1). Other specimens, in life position, were studied in the field (but not collected) by P.W.S., in 1984, at Qarn Murrah, Sharjah (see p. 506). Description. Measurements of the specimens are shown in Table 1, and plots of their overall dimensions, and of changes in shape of the arete cardinale and pillars, as well as in their arrangment (a), with respect to commissural diameter (DJ, are shown in text-figs. 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The RVs in BMNFI LL 28000 28004 are of gently curved elongate conical form, reaching over 230 mm in length in LL 28001. The other two specimens have RVs of more obtusely conical form. The TVs are operculi- form and only very gently convex towards the strongly ventrally biased apex. The commissure is of rounded trigonal form, with the anterior and ventral margins slightly flattened, and the posterodorsal margin, with the infoldings, somewhat bulging (PI. 61, fig. 1; text-fig. 6e g). 510 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TABLE 1. Measurements on specimens of Torreiles sanchezi milovanovici Grubic from the Maastrichtian of Oman and the United Arab Emirates, described in this paper. Specimen numbers beginning with LL are housed in the British Museum (Natural History), and those with P.W.S., in the collection of the senior author. Locality data are given in the text (p. 506), and the abbreviations for the measurements explained in text-fig. 2. Specimen Shell size (mm) Hinge Angle n p Pillar Angle n a Pillar dimensions (mm) L D. Da IPo IPi IP2 wPo wPi wPa (a) LL 28000 190 103 89 — 39 32 29 26 8 10 9 (h) LL 28001 234 96 no — 31 46 40 34 6 13 10 80 91 37 31 21 25 6 10 9 > 48 56 49 18 13 14 7 6 6 35 42 70 11 > 9 > 7 5 5 6 (c) LL 28002 226 104 113 — 28 36 29 42 14 11 7 (d) LL 28003 164 93 89 — 42 36 29 23 8 10 10 (c) LL 28004 > 127 100 98 25 15 45 36 33 10 12 11 70 78 31 27 19 19 8 10 8 44 57 61 15 12 11 8 7 7 (/) LL 28004 — > 48 > 52 — 50 16 > 11 > 10 5 7 7 (small RV) (g) P.W.S. 84/x.l 160 108 113 — 40 45 33 23 8 ~10 ~10 (h) P.W.S. 84/32.1 > 42 116 > 93 — 20 > 50 > 35 20 16 12 9 38 45 75 22 20 16 6 6 5 The pale brown, calcitic outer shell layer of the RV is more than 5 mm thick in all the adult specimens, with a highly distinctive ornament (PI. 61, fig. 4): broad ribs, 5-8 mm wide, with coarse growth rugae, are separated by deeply indented grooves. The latter are expressed on the inner valve margin as salient spurs (PI. 62, fig. 3). The spurs continue along the infolded shell wall of the arete eardinale and pillars, giving them the distinctively branched medial structure, when seen in section (PI. 61, figs. 2 and 3), noted by Grubic (1979). The calcitic outer layer of the LV is only about I mm thick, and, apart from faint growth inductions, is smooth (PI. 62, fig. 1); no vestiges of any pores or canals are seen in it. Sections across the margins of this outer shell layer (PI. 62, fig. 4; text-fig. 7) show the growth lines to be recurved on to at least the periphery of its upper surface. The subdued character of its growth undulations contrast markedly with the coarse rugae of the RV. The discrepancy in thickness between the outer shell layers of the two valves means that most of the inner margin of the RV extends out beyond the rim of the LV (PI. 62, figs. 1 and 3). Although the inner shell layers, which would originally have been aragonitic (Skelton, 1976), are now replaced by calcite spar, evidence for the blind canals that penetrate the LV inner shell can be seen in one of the specimens (PI. 61, fig. 5). EXPLANATION OF PLATE 61 Figs. 15. Torreites sanchezi milovanovici Grubic, 1979. 1 -3, BMNH LL 28004, unnamed limestone member in Aruma Group (probably Maastrichtian), 30 km south-south-west of the Saiwan airfield (lat. 20° 39' N. and long. 57° 31' E.), eastern central Oman. 1, RV interior (see text-fig. 2 for explanation); 2, 3, sections across successively younger ontogenetic stages of the RV, which is attached to the RV of another juvenile individual {lower right), all x 1. 4, BMNH LL 28002, locality and age details as in 1-3; ventral flank of RV, xO-5. 5, P.W.S. 84/x.l, unnamed limestone member of Aruma Group (probably Maastrichtian), Filim, northern Masirah Bay (lat. 20° 36' N. and long. 58° 12' E.), Oman; detail of broken section across posteroventral part of LV, showing the (dark) thin calcitic outer shell layer above, and the canaliferous recrystallized inner layer (originally aragonite), below, forming a descending prominence, x 3. PLATE 61 SKELTON and WRIGHT, Torreites 512 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 140|- Ei20 E Q100 cT CO QC 80 LU I— LU 2 < I 60 _J < oc w CO o 20 □ 1 1 10^ J I L 8 fg eg □ I I- D. Key to specimens □ New world ■ I o Old world • I a J I I 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 LENGTH OF RV (L) in mm. TEXT-FIG. 3. Graph of Di and Di against L for the specimens of Toireites sanchezi listed in Tables 1 and 2. The measurements are explained in text-fig. 2. EXPLANATION OF PLATE 62 Figs. 1-4. Toireites sanchezi milovanovici Grubic, 1979. 1, BMNH LL 28002, unnamed limestone member in Aruma Group (probably Maastrichtian), 30 km south-south-west of the Saiwan airfield (lat. 20° 39' N. and long. 57° 31' E.), eastern central Oman; bivalved specimen, viewed from the LV side, showing the (incom- plete) operculiform LV fitting in the RV, the inner margins of which are thus exposed around the LV periphery, x 0.75. 2, BMNH LL 28001, locality and age details as in 1; detail showing blade-like posterior myophore of LV (centre), seen in section from dorsal side, projecting down between the arete cardinale (Po, right) and Pi (left) of the RV, x 1 -25. 3, 4, BMNH LL 28003, locality and age details as in 1. 3, posterodorsal region of bivalved shell, viewed from the LV side, showing the somewhat crushed operculiform LV, with subdued external growth undulations, as well as the exposed RV inner margin, with salient ridges, running around the LV periphery and projecting up through sinuses in the latter, above the arete cardinale (Po, left) and pillars (Pi and P2), x 2-5; 4, close-up of broken section across a chip of the LV margin, indicated by an arrow in 3, showing the recurved growth lines in the outer shell layer (see text-fig. 7 for explanation), x 10. PLATE 62 SKELTON and WRIGHT, Torreites 514 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 Key to specimens COMMISSURAL DIAMETER (D, ) in mm TEXT-FIG. 4. Graphs of IP/wP against Di for Pq, Pi, and P2 of the specimens of Torreites sancliezi listed in Tables 1 and 2. The measurements are explained in text-fig. 2. Three deep radial grooves on the posterodorsal flank of the RV correspond with the infolded arete cardinale and pillars. The crests of these project through wide sinuses embayed from the margin of the LV (PI. 62, fig. I). The elongate arete cardinale and the shorter, subequal pillars are wide and finger-like in section. Pi is usually, but not invariably longer than P2 (see Table 1). In some specimens the arete cardinale tapers inwards slightly, so becoming narrower than the pillars (PI. 62, fig. 1). The strikingly low values of a are achieved ontogenetically: sections across the RV show the angle to reach 75° in the juvenile shell (PI. 61, figs. 1 3; text- figs. 5 and 6e-g). SKELTON AND WRIGHT; ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 515 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 COMMISSURAL DIAMETER (D, ) in mm. TEXT-FIG. 5. Graph of a against Di for the specimens of Torreites sanchezi listed in Tables 1 and 2. The measurements are explained in text-fig. 2. The dentition (PI. 61 , fig. I ), shows ji to be about 25°. The narrow sockets for the TV teeth are separated by a pinched, wall-like RV tooth lying posteriorly to the inner tip of the arete cardinale. The latter has a rounded inner termination indicating complete absence of a ligament. The tooth-like posterior adductor myophore of the LV is situated dorsally behind the teeth, projecting down between Pi and the arete cardinale (PI. 62, fig. 2), where it is received in the RV by a large socket (PI. 61, fig. 1; text-fig. 2a). The anterior adductor myophore of the LV forms an arcuate ledge extending some way around the anterior and ventral margins, where it faces on to a broad inclined shelf in the RV, supporting a distinctively reticulate muscle scar (PI. 61, fig. 1; text- fig. 2a). The body cavity is very shallow, and its volume further reduced by the large, downwardly projecting myocardinal elements of the LV. Much of the apical 'limb' of the RV is filled by tabulae, though these are largely obscured by recrystallization. Palaeoecology. Though found close together, specimens BMNH LL 28000-28004 were recovered as loose blocks, and so their original life position remains uncertain. Evidence for attachment of one individual to another is shown by specimens LL 28001 and LL 28004 (PI. 61. fig. 3). Otherwise they represent solitary individuals. The elopgated and curved horn shape of specimens LL 28000, LL 28001, and LL 28002 suggests a reclining, boat-like habit, with the convex flank of the RV shallowly embedded in the sediment and the commissure raised up, away from it (text-fig. 8). The evidence of associated borings and epibionts lends some 516 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TABLE 2. Measurements on specimens of Torreites sanchezi sanchezi (Douville) (1 12) from the Upper Campanian to Lower Maastrichtian of the Caribbean, 'T. cf. sanchezi' (13) from the topmost Santonian to basal Campanian of Jamaica, and T. s. milovanovici Grubic (14) from the Maastrichtian of Sharjah (UAE), taken from the literature. The original species designations and references thereto (where locality details may be found) are recorded for each specimen cited. The abbreviations for the measure- ments are explained in text-fig. 2. Shell size (mm) Hinge Angle (-) Pillar Angle ( ) Pillar dimensions (mm) Specimen L D, D^ P a IPo IPi IP2 wPo wPi WP2 T. sanchezi 1. Douville (1927) 83 >83 34 81 40 >32 >14 7 8 7 (holotype) 2. Palmer ( 1933), 130 > 120 126 90 20 52 7 1 1 6 pi. 7, fig. 2 3. Palmer ( 1933), 124 120 50 105 70 49 27 6 8 8 pi. 8, fig. 2 4, Ruttcn(1936) 20-30 (description) 5. Vermunt ( 1937), 230 115 80 (description) 6. MacGillavry ‘90-100’ ‘75-120’ (1937) 7. MacGillavry 50 _ _ (1937), exceptional specimen 8. Jung (1970), 135 99 122 95 54 40 25 8 7 9 G. 14065 on pi. 2 9. Jung (1970), 75 >57 >40 98 98 >72 >43 104 34 102 94 118 105 39 27 > 16 65 33 >21 >11 45 >20 >13 >9 26 7 5 4 5 7 7 4 7 8 7 5 5 G. 14066 on pi. 3 10. Van Dommelen 74 (50) 111 27 15 5 5 6 5 (1971), J.3702n (table 5) 1 1 . Van Dommelen 76 (90) 49 121 >30 26 14 7 9 7 (1971), J.37026 (table 5) 12. Van Dommelen >160 86 78 32 118 33 24 14 6 6 8 (1971), J.3676 (table 5) 'T. cf. sanchezi' 13. Chubb (1971) >110 27 65 45 28 II 5 7 'T. milovanovici' 14. Grubic (1979) >130 100 12 >60 50 60 10 11 10 SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RLIDIST 517 TEXT-FIG. 6. Drawings of sections across the RVs of Torreites sauchezi showing the ontogenetic divergence in pillar arrangement between the Caribbean (a d) and the Arabian (e g) subspecies. The drawings show the outlines of the outer shell layer, as well as some of the internal features in a, d, and G, and arc all the same scale (scale bar = 1 cm), a is from the holotypc (Douvillc 1927, pi. 4, fig. 1 ). Abbreviations arc as in text-fig. 2a. b d are from a specimen (G. 14065) illustrated by Jung (1970, pi. 2, fig. 16, c, and d respectively), e-g are from specimen BMNH LL 28004, illustrated here in Plate 61, figs. 3 1 respectively. 518 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 growth lines on LV exterior TEXT-FIG. 7. Explanatory drawing of the marginal fragment of LV outer shell layer of Torreites sanchezi (speci- men BMNH LL 28003), shown in Plate 62, fig. 4. A radial section across the valve rim, adjacent to the inner tip of P], is shown facing the observer. support. In LL 28001 there is a slight preponderance of borings on the concave dorsal flank of the RV, where the fragment of another individual is also attached: the convex ventral flank would here seem likely to have been lowermost, and such a position is further substantiated by the orientation of some fine geopetal sediment inside the shell. LL 28002 is of similar shape, but has borings and rare encrusters scattered around all its flanks: possibly it suflfered post-mortem displacement. However, it clearly shows xenomorphic overgrowth on to another rudist fragment high up on its convex ventral flank, again hinting at this surface having lain against the seafloor in life. In LL 28000 the anterodorsal face is convex and the posteroventral face is concave. A slight preponderance of borings on the latter face, as well as a couple of compactional indentations on to that surface hint at it having been uppermost. LL 28003 and LL 28004 have more or less straight RVs, with borings scattered around all their flanks. These would seem to have lived in an essentially upright position (text-fig. 8). Burial in such a position is indicated in specimen LL 28003 by compaction along the central axis of the RV. The matrix associated with these specimens is a pale yellow (weathered), medium-grained bioclastic pack- stone with subangular to subrounded bioclasts: it is presumably of shallow marine origin, as suggested by the grain-supported texture and rounding of the bioclasts. Specimens PWS 84/x.I and PWS 84/32.1 have obtusely conical RVs, and are likely to have been shallowly embedded, barrel-like elevators (text-fig. 8). Specimens of similar form were observed in situ at Qarn Murrah, Sharjah, with such an upright habit (text-fig. 9). Again, these are associated with medium-grained to fine- grained biomicrite packstones of presumed shallow marine origin. TEXT-FIG. 8. Diagram showing the two kinds of life position apparently exhibited by Torreites sanchezi milovanovici—-d reclining, boat-like habit (left) and an upright habit (right). Note that elevation of the commissure from the substratum (dotted ornament) is achieved in both cases. The difference between them probably only reflects variability in the orientations established during larval settlement and early growth. SKELTON AND WRIGHT; ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 519 TEXT-FIG. 9. Two RVs of Toneites sanchezi milovanovici shown in sec- tion in upright life position (cf. text-fig. 8, right), on the upper surface of a bedding plane of Maastrichtian limestone (Simsima Formation) at Qarn Murrah, Sharjah (UAE) (see text-fig. 1 and p. 506 for locality details). The lens cap is 5-5 cm across. Discussion. The possibility of our specimens merely being Old World homeomorphs of Terreites can be immediately rejected: they share with the New World forms too many constructionally independent, specialized features for coincidental convergence to be plausible. The features in question comprise: ( 1 ) the smooth upper surface of the left valve; (2) the apically blind canals in the LV inner shell; (3) the unusual relative sizes and shapes of the RV pillars and arete caniinale, and their exposure through broad sinuses in the LV; and (4) the distinctive radially indented ornament of the RV outer shell. Plots of the overall dimensions (text-fig. 3), and of the shapes (text-fig. 4), and relative positions of the pillars and the arete cardinale (text-fig. 5) of our specimens, drawn from Table 1, form compact, well-defined clusters; they clearly all belong to one species population. The fragmentary RV holotype of ‘T. milovanovici Grubic’ represents a slightly larger individual than any of ours (see Table 2, specimen 14), but all its measured features plot comfortably as extrapolations from the cluster of data points for our specimens. In fact the obliquity of the section across the valve figured by Grubic (1979, pi. 1) is slightly misleading in making the pillars look more extended than they are. Our measurements are taken directly from the specimen itself, with allowances being made for this ‘cut effect’. All the Old World specimens, then, may satisfactorily be grouped in a single species. It is the relation of this to the New World species that is more problematical. Prior to Grubic (1979) only two species of Torreites had been recognized, the type species T. sanchezi (Douville) and T. tschoppi MacGillavry. The latter is typically much smaller than the Old World form (rarely > 40 mm in commissural diameter), with simple costulate ribs about 1-2 mm wide, and is found in dense clusters of individuals, rather than in ones or twos (MacGillavry 1937, p. 129). Besides, it also appears to be older than the Old World specimens (see p. 506). It is thus clearly distinct from the Old World species. However, it approaches the latter in having a relatively low a, of about 45-70°, according to MacGillavry (1937). Measurements reported for, or taken directly from the published figures of all described specimens referred to T. sanchezi are shown in Table 2, and are also plotted on text-figs. 3-5. Grubic (1979) erected two new species from among these, T. co.xi and T. chuhhi. The former was founded on two 520 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 specimens, the holotype being one of those described by Jung (1970) (specimen 9, Table 2). It has the same size, ornament, and basic pillar arrangements as in the other T. sanchezi, but was considered to dilfer in possessing a relatively longer and thinner arete cardinale, and pillars with slightly bulging inner tips. With such small samples available, these subtle distinctions do not carry conviction. The holotype simply lies at the edge of a rather broad cluster of points for arete cardinale shape in the New World T. sanchezi (text-fig. 4). Moreover, the swelling of the pillar tips shown in Jung’s Plate 3 is only very slight. The species cannot be upheld and we here suppress it as a junior subjective synonym of T. sanchezi. T. chuhhi is based on a single poorly preserved specimen described as T. cf. sanchezi by Chubb (1971) (specimen 13, Table 2). Again, its independent status is dubious, though the specimen is intriguing in possessing a relatively low value of a (27°, rather than the 40° reported by Grubic). It is also older than the other specimens considered here (probably latest Santonian to earliest Cam- panian; see p. 506). Further material is needed to clarify its position, particularly in relation to the coeval T. tschoppi. The final comparison left to be made, then, is with T. sanchezi itself. Plots of the shapes and relative positions of the pillars and arete cardinale (text-figs. 4 and 5) for all the specimens included here in the New World T. sanchezi (specimens 1 -12 in Table 2) form coherent, if somewhat broadly spread clusters of data points, supporting their inclusion within one species population. Their commissural diameters (text-fig. 3) also plot together reasonably well, with the exception of the small specimen 10 on Table 2; the variation in shell length can readily be attributed to ecophenotypic variation in relation to life position (text-fig. 8). The Old World specimens share with the New World T. sanchezi the same adult size range (text- fig. 3) as well as precisely the same distinctive external ornament: the broad radial ribs of the Old World specimens have widths varying from about 5 to 8 mm, exactly as in those of the New World specimens (e.g. Jung 1970, pi. 1, figs. 2 and 3). The one value of fi from the Old World specimens (from BMNH LL 28004) is at the lower end of the range exhibited by those from the New World (compare Tables 1 and 2). Pillar form in the two populations (text-fig. 4) is closely similar in smaller (younger) individuals, though in the largest individuals Pi tends to become relatively longer and more slender in the New World specimens. A similar trend in the arete cardinale (Po) is even more pronounced. There is thus some slight ontogenetic divergence between the two populations from a more or less similar juvenile condition. This divergence may be linked constructionally with the rather more marked separation of the two populations on the basis of a values (text-fig. 5): those in the Old World specimens are notably smaller than those of the others. Again, there appears to have been ontogenetic divergence, involving reduction in a throughout growth in the Old World forms, but with little change in the New World forms. Yet the existence of some specimens among the New World population with low values of a (e.g. specimen 7 on Table 2, cited by MacGillavry 1937, p. 129) gives support for close linkage between the two populations. Although these few differences between the adults of the Old and New World populations are sulficient to render each distinctly recognizable, it is the close similarity of the two populations in all other respects that is the more striking. Given the small samples involved and our relative ignorance of many aspects of rudist functional morphology, it is really a matter of subjective judgement as to whether the Old World population should still be recognized as a distinct species CT. milovanovicf), or whether it should be treated, as we propose here, as a geographical subspecies of T. sanchezi, which we label T. s. milovanovici Grubic, 1979, in contrast with the New World stock of T. s. sanchezi (Douville, 1927), in which we include all the New World records of T. sanchezi recognized here. We favour this latter option because of the existence of exceptional specimens in the New World with a values close to those of specimens from the Old World. These suggest that the one significant diagnostic feature of the Old World popula- tion may already have existed within the range of morphological variability of the New World population. The paradox of the extraordinarily wide geographical separation of the two subspecies will be considered in a later section (p. 522). SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 521 PALAEOBIOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS OF TO RREITES Torreites is rare in the Caribbean Province; Grubic (1979, p. 94) noted that the then published record of the genus was founded on only about twenty specimens (which have nevertheless fuelled at least nine systematic papers alone!). Our material, as well as expanding the recorded total of specimens by at least a third, is also significant for its good state of preservation. Placement of the genus in the Hippuritidae can be confirmed, while the reason for its aberrant lack of pores in the LV can now be explained from investigation of the growth lines in that valve. Though generally considered a hippuritid because of its pillars (Douville, 1927), Torreites diflTers from all other hippuritids in its lack of pores. Van Dommelen (1971, p. 65) commented: ‘In reality, however, all we know about the VS [= LV] of Torreites is, that the outer shell layer is imperforate in the parts between L, S and E [— Po, Pi and Pij. But what about the slit-like openings over these infoldings of the available eroded specimens? Have they been covered or not covered, and if covered, was this cover a reticulum or something different?’ MacGillavry (1937, p. 128) too, queried whether or not the pillars really had been exposed through open sinuses in the LV. It is unambiguously clear from our specimens (e.g. PI. 61, fig. 5 and PI. 62, figs. 1, 3, 4) both that, no roof of any kind existed over the crests of the arete cardinale and the pillars, and that the LV outer shell layer is indeed imperforate. Is Torreites thus a hippuritid that has lost its pores, or one descended from a primitive form that never had them, or not a hippuritid at all? The latter option is the least likely. Not only does Torreites possess the pillars so characteristic of the family, albeit of unusual form, it also has a typically hippuritid myocardinal apparatus with its markedly tooth-like posterior my- ophore in the LV, received in a socket in the RV. Its overall shell form, with an elongate-conical RV and operculiform LV, is also typical of, though not exclusive to the family. If Torreites is accepted as a hippuritid, the lack of pores is unlikely to be a primitive trait. Pores are already well established in the earliest hippuritids, which predate the oldest Torreites by about two stages. Torreites is further characterized by such specializations as the extreme elongation of the arete cardinale, despite loss of the ligament itself, and the blind canals in the LV interior. Two features in our specimens together suggest that the lack of pores is secondary: ( 1 ) the thinness of the outer shell layer in the LV relative to that in the RV, with the margin of the latter projecting well beyond that of the former (PI. 62, fig. 3); and (2) the recurvature of the growth lines in the outer shell layer of the LV on to its outer surface (PI. 62, fig. 4; text-fig. 7), indicating that mantle tissue reached out on to at least the peripheral parts of the outer surface of the valve. Mantle tissue would thus have been freely exposed both around the inner margin of the RV and around the periphery, if not more, of the outer surface of the LV. In normal hippuritids, no mantle tissue was directly exposed in this manner. Rather, extensions of it lined the pore and canal system in the LV outer shell layer, where its cilia are interpreted as having driven water currents, drawn from above the shell, over the covered inner rim of the RV, enabling the entrapment there of food particles, without the need of valve gaping (Skelton 1976). The free exposure of mantle tissue in Torreites would have made redundant the canal and pore system of its ancestors. Its atrophy would then have been hastened by the lowering and retreat of the LV outer shell layer to allow maximum exposure of the RV inner rim. A reconstruction of Torreites in life, with its corona of exposed mantle tissue is shown in text-fig. 10. What was the adaptive significance of this exposure of mantle tissue? One possibility is that the externalization of food entrapment (Skelton 1976) was taken a stage further than in the ancestral hippuritids, with direct trapping of food particles on the exposed mantle projections, as has been proposed for radiolitids (Skelton \919a). But such a trivial modification of function seems an unsatisfactory explanation for so considerable a morphological change; it is hard to conceive of any obvious benefit to feeding efficiency that might have been won thereby, and the increased exposure would seem in any case to have carried an increased risk of physical or biological damage to the mantle rims. One significant effect of the exposure, however, would have been the emergence of mantle tissue from the darkened confines of the ancestral pore/canal and covered rim system, into the light. This immediately calls to mind the possibility of symbiotic zooxanthellae, by analogy 522 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TEXT-FIG. 10. Reconstruction of the appearance in life of Torreites sanchezi milovanovici. The upper part of the shell is shown, with thick extensions of mantle margin projecting out between the valve rims, in the manner of the living Giant Clam, Tridacna. It may be surmised that, as in the latter, these mantle extensions were vividly and variably coloured. with the Giant Clam, Tridacna. The possibility of algal symbiosis in rudists has frequently been raised in the literature (e.g. Kiihn 1937; Philip 1972; Coates 1973; Kauffman and Sohl 1974; Vogel 1975; and Skelton 1979r?) and has recently been ably reviewed by Cowen (1983). The consensus of most of these works is that such symbiosis was widespread in the group— a conclusion supported by Cowen himself. Skelton (1979a), in contrast, argued that positive evidence for possession of zooxanthellate tissue, in the form of clear adaptation of the shell to allow maximum exposure of mantle tissue to the light, is only seen in certain broad-rimmed radiolitid genera. Their symbiosis is considered to have arisen as a secondary adaptation of the enlarged mantle margins associated originally with food particle entrapment. The layout of the pore and canal system in normal hippuritids, in particular, was well suited for supplying the RV mantle rim with feeding currents, and is most satisfactorily explained thus. Cowen nevertheless felt that the tissue within the canal and pore system could have been exposed to light through the shelly cover over the radiating canals. Yet in some hippuritids this cover is actually quite thick (often over 3 mm), and, moreover, the canals show no tendency to flatten out in such a way as to maximize exposure to light. Many hippuritids seem, in any case, to have lived in somewhat turbid, poorly lit waters (Skelton \919h). It thus remains unlikely that any of the normal hippuritids, at least, possessed zooxanthellae. With Torreites, however, we may have an exception; its dear morphological adaptation for free exposure of mantle tissue suggests a hippuritid ‘redesigned’ as a photophile. The scarce palaeoecological information on Torreites — implying a basically upward growth form and occupation of shallow, clear waters— is consistent with the algal symbiosis hypothesis. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PRESENCE OF T. SANCHEZim OMAN AND THE UAE Torreites is not alone among Campanian-Maastrichtian shallow marine benthos in showing disjunct endemism between the Caribbean Province of Kauffman (1973) and various sites in the eastern part of the Tethyan Realm, ranging from the Middle East to the East Indies. Chubb (1956), recognized such a distribution in the radiolitid rudist genus, Thyrastylon, remarking (p. 39): ‘It is indeed interesting that in the same epoch, the Maestrichtian [^/c], a form closely resembling T. coryi [a Caribbean species] was living in Persian seas, so that the geographic range of Thyrastylon extended from Guatemala to Persia, a distance of nearly 10,000 miles.’ Kollmann and Sohl (1980) stated that the itieriid gastropod, Vernedia friesi Kollmann and Sohl, from the Upper Cenomanian or Eower Turonian of Colima Province, Mexico, had a closer affinity with a southern Indian form, V. SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 523 glohoides (Stoliczka), from the Campanian to Maastrichtian Arrialoor Group of the Trichinopoly District, than with the European and Transcaucasian species of the genus. Another gastropod, Actaeonella borneensis Nuttall and Leong, is known both from an uncertain Cenomanian to Campanian level in Borneo and from Campanian to Maastrichtian strata in Mexico and Cuba (Sohl and Kollmann 1985). The codiacean alga Ovulites occurs in the Upper Cretaceous of the Caribbean and in northern Iraq, Afghanistan, and Tibet, though not from the Mediterranean Tethys (Elliott 1981). These are but a few examples that complement the clear-cut case of Torreiles to establish this form of disjunct endemism as a palaeobiogeographical problem in need of a solution. There are three possible explanations for such a highly disjunct distribution of shallow-water benthic taxa: ( 1 ) false synonymy of coeval homeomorphs; (2) plate tectonic drifting apart of formerly united shallow-water provinces; and (3) temporary range extension between the two regions brought about by the development of a continuous intervening chain of shallow-water ‘staging posts’ for planktonic larval dispersal. The first option, of coeval evolution of not one, but several pairs of homeomorphs in the two regions, over the same limited time interval, is in itself improbable, and becomes yet more so with every new example of the disjunct distribution that is added to the list. The importance of Torreites is that its several constructionally independent diagnostic features allow us expressly to reject homeomorphy as a reasonable hypothesis in its case; any argument for homeomorphy in the other examples cited must now be relegated to special pleading for particular examples. The second explanation, based on drifting apart of the two regions was evidently that favoured by Grubic (1979, p. 94), who concluded: ‘The presence of a specific Caribbean Upper Cretaceous rudist from in the eastern Mediterranean can by no means be interpreted other than by assuming that both Americas, Antilles and the Mediterranean were much closer in the Upper Cretaceous.’ Such an explanation would be reasonable if there were matching geotectonic evidence. However, there is none for Oman having been anywhere near the Caribbean in Late Cretaceous times. The strata containing Torreites in Oman and the UAE represent the first marine autochthonous deposits upon the Semail Nappe, itself already obducted on to the Arabian foreland (see Glennie 1977 and Murris 1980 for details). So the area in question was then, as it is today, firmly part of the Arabian continent. Likewise, the Caribbean sites with Torreites (Cuba, Jamaica, and Puerto Rico) were unambiguously associated with the central American region in the Late Cretaceous (Mattson and Lewis 1980). We are then left with the third possibility, of planktonic larval dispersal along a chain of staging posts. In the absence of recorded fossils of rudist prodissoconchs, the character of rudist larvae can only be surmised from circumstantial evidence. The geologically almost simultaneous appearance in the Late Turonian of the primitive hippuritid species, Hippiirites resect us Defrance in Europe and North Africa (Douville 1890-1897, 1910) and of the almost certainly synonymous ‘//. mexicamts Barcena’ in Mexico (Muellerried 1930), for example, favours a readily dispersed planktonic larval stage (incidentally, this is against the notion of a larval brood pouch speculated upon by Skelton (1976)). So it is not unreasonable to suppose that such a larval stage existed in Torreites. The two possible oceanic routes for dispersal between the Old and New World sites of Torreites are; (1) via the Mediterranean Tethys and Atlantic; and (2) across the Pacific and eastern Tethys (text-fig. 11). The Mediterranean/Atlantic route is considered unlikely for two reasons. Lirst, the bivalve endemism data of Kauffman (1973) suggest that the ‘north Indian Ocean sub-province’ (incorporat- ing Oman and the UAE) and neighbouring ‘eastern Mediterranean sub-province’ became signifi- cantly distinct from the ‘western Mediterranean sub-province’ in Campanian-Maastrichtian times, implying the presence between them of barriers to dispersal. In a recent study of Campanian/ Maastrichtian rudist distributions in the Mediterranean region, Philip (1985) similarly establishes a clear distinction between an ‘Aquitano-Pyrenean palaeobiogeographic unit’ and an ‘eastern and central Mediterranean’ one, with continental barriers lying between them. A few central Mediter- ranean forms are preserved in southern Spain, howeVer, presumably derived via a North African 524 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TEXT-FIG. II. Inferred Campanian Maastrichtian palaeogeography of the World, showing oceanic surface currents (arrows). The Americas are duplicated at each end of the map to allow direct comparison between the Mediterranean Tethys/Atlantic and Pacific marine connections between the two sites from which Torreites has been recovered (indicated by T). It is argued in the text that a chain of shallow staging posts, spread across the Pacific and eastern Tethys, was the most likely means by which the range of Torreites was extended, by larval dispersal, from the Caribbean, across to the Arabian region. Continental positions derived from Smith and Briden (1977), land (dotted ornament) and sea (white) distributions from Zeigler et cil. (1983), and ocean currents from various sources cited in the text. route (Philip 1983). In any case, there are no records, as yet, either of Torreites or Thyrastyloii— both very distinctive fossils — anywhere in the Mediterranean region. The second objection to the Mediterranean/Atlantic route is the increasingly impassable width of the Atlantic in Campanian-Maastrichtian times, as reflected in the rising generic dissimilarity between its two sides with respect to bivalves (Kauffman 1973) and, in particular, to rudists (Coates 1973). The alternative explanation is that Torreites, Thyrastylon, and the other disjunct endemics dis- cussed earlier were somehow able to cross the Late Cretaceous Pacific Ocean. In which direction might such dispersal have taken place? Many authors have argued for a circum-global East to West equatorial current during the Cretaceous, passing through Tethys, and across the Pacific Ocean (text-fig. 11; Luyendyk et al. 1972; Gordon 1973; Berggren and Hollister 1974, 1977; and Lloyd 1982). The Tethyan Realm was thus extended for several thousand kilometres into the eastern Pacific (Gordon 1973) and many Pacific seamounts have now been found to have been capped by rudist-bearing atolls in Aptian to Cenomanian times (recently reviewed, with references therein, by Winterer and Metzler 1984 and Konishi 1985). From mid-Aptian times onwards, the opening Atlantic promoted the growth of endemism in the Caribbean, with respect to the rest of Tethys (Coates 1973; Skelton 1982), to provincial levels by Late Santonian times (Kauffman 1973). This suggests that the Late Cretaceous Torreites is most likely to have originated in the Caribbean, and then dispersed westwards towards eastern Tethys (text-fig. 11). Such a model is consistent with MacGillavry’s (1937) identification of the older Caribbean species T. tschoppi as an ancestral form. SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 525 Evidence for staging posts that would have facilitated the trans-Pacific dispersal of Torreites and other forms is now well documented from DSDP work. Beckmann (1976), for example, has de- scribed redeposited Campanian-Maastrichtian shallow-water foraminifera from the Line Islands seamount chain. Two of the genera, Asterorhis and Sulcoperculina, had previously only been recorded from the Caribbean and surrounding areas. A third, typical Caribbean form, Pseudorbito- ides israelskyi Vaughan and Cole, was also known from eastern Tethyan sites (details in Dilley 1973). Other findings, reviewed by Schlanger et al. (1981), have extended the evidence for such staging posts as far across the ocean as the Nauru Basin (Marshall Islands). These records indicate that the Pacific Plate was studded with islands and/or seamounts which served as stepping stones for some Caribbean shallow-water benthos in Campanian-Maastrichtian times. Evidence that the Farallon Plate, which at that time separated the Pacific Plate from the Americas by some 6000 km, was similarly endowed was also provided by Schlanger et al. (1981). This survives in the form of ophiolite complexes with exotic limestones, plastered on to the western flanks of the Americas during subduction of the plate. There is thus direct evidence for former staging posts, carrying a Caribbean-derived shallow marine benthic fauna of Campanian-Maastrichtian age, for over half the distance between the Caribbean and Oman. Documentation of suitable staging posts along the remaining (eastern Tethyan) part of the route is very much more difficult, because the available evidence is now caught up in the various Tethyan suture zones running from the East Indies to the Middle East (Audley- Charles et al., 1980). It seems, however, that some shallow or even emergent physiographical prominences, such as island arcs and small continental blocks may then still have lain in the oceanic gap between India and Eurasia, although most of these had already been accreted on to Eurasia by mid-Cretaceous times (Tapponnier et al. 1981). Moreover, Maastrichtian orbitoid and rudist- bearing facies are known from the southern edge of the Lhasa Block, in Tibet (Herm et al. 1985 and pers. comm.), which was by then accreted on to the southern flank of Eurasia. From the evidence given above, it is therefore not unreasonable to postulate that Torreites spread from the Caribbean to Oman, exploiting a continuous chain of shallow-water staging posts that stretched across the Pacific and eastern Tethys during Campanian-Maastrichtian times. As a test for this hypothesis, we predict that Torreites, or other forms with the same disjunct distribution, such as Thyrastyloii, will eventually be recovered either from DSDP material from the Pacific, or from shallow-water Tethyan carbonates of Campanian-Maastrichtian age caught up in Himalayan and other eastern Tethyan suture zones. Conversely, the discovery of such faunal elements in the western Mediterranean (e.g. north-western Africa or southern Spain) would militate against our hypothesis. Two palaeobiogeographical corollaries to this model are worth noting. First, the repeated popu- lation-sampling effect that would have accompanied the successive westward dispersals of spat from staging post to staging post ought, surely, to have resulted in a pronounced ‘founder’ effect in the population that eventually became established in Oman and the UAE (see Mayr 1970, for expla- nation of the founder principle). It is thus remarkable that the only significant modal deviation of the Old World population from the Caribbean population is in the ontogenetic reduction of a (p. 520), which, in our view, only merits distinction at the subspecific level. Our model for the historical biogeography of Torreites and its ‘fellow travellers’ also bears on the current debate about the relative roles of vicariance and dispersal in explanations for the geographical distributions of taxa (concisely reviewed by Forey 1981). In identifying the Caribbean as the centre of origin for Torreites, and treating its appearance in eastern Tethys as a result of dispersal along staging posts between the two areas, we have clearly adopted a ‘dispersalist’ expla- nation for the disjunct distribution of the genus. In our view the appearance of the staging posts caused the decline of the Pacific Ocean as a barrier to dispersal of Caribbean shallow-water benthos during the Campanian-Maastrichtian. The Pacific, then, became a ‘filter’ for biogeographical range expansion (Simpson 1962) at that time, because selected taxa appear to have made the full crossing. Forey’s (1981) characterization of such accounts as emphasizing processes supposed from ad hoc considerations to have brought about distributional patterns, and as lacking in any general principles 526 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 of pattern analysis — an advantage reserved for vicariance studies— is a misleading criticism, suggest- ing, as it does, that the accounts are difficult, if not impossible, to test. The hypothesis of the appearance of a trans-Pacific filter for the westward dispersal of Caribbean shallow marine benthos in the Late Cretaceous, could readily be tested by an analysis of fossil distributions. If our model is correct, then among the taxa showing apparent disjunct endemism on either side of the Pacific there should be an overwhelming preponderance of stratigraphically older records, for each of the taxa considered, on the Caribbean side. The test should be workable, because the purported sequence of events was spread over a ‘geological’ time scale of millions of years, and so ought to have left a realistically detectable imprint on the fossil record. In the case of Torreites, for example, there is a generous stratigraphical spread between (1) the first record of Torreites in the Santonian or earliest Campanian, (2) the establishment of the full chain of staging posts in the Campanian-Maastrichtian, and (3) the first record of Torreites in the Old World (Early Maastrichtian). It should be noted, however, that what is being discussed here is a biogeographical range expansion provoked by changes in the geological context for dispersal. The process of larval dispersal itself is admittedly beyond geological analysis, because such events on the ‘ecological’ time scale would be, to all intents and purposes, geologically instantaneous. Since we are dealing with the effect on the distribution of taxa of the disappearance of a former barrier (the Pacific Ocean prior to the completion of the chain of staging posts), we could not, indeed, employ any vicariance method of analysis, simply because these are all irrelevant to such a phenomenon. As Forey (1981) makes clear, the aim of vicariance analysis is to unravel the history of progressive fragmentation of an already widespread ancestral biota. Were we investigating, say, the partitioning of the Tethyan Realm in the Late Cretaceous as a result of the appearance of barriers, then some form of vicariance analysis might be both appropriate and effective. Our point, then, is that barriers come and go on a geological time scale, and so the two methods of analysis both have roles to play in palaeobiogeography: vicariance analysis where developing barriers fragmented an ancestral biota; and ‘dispersal’ analysis where the demise of barriers has allowed range extensions to take place. Both methods, we believe, can yield hypotheses about historical biogeography that can be further tested from fossil distributions. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS Systematics. The hippuritid rudist bivalve species, T. sanchezi (Douville, 1927), is here considered to comprise two geographical subspecies. The nominotypical subspecies, T. s. sanchezi (Douville) is known from the Upper Campanian to Lower Maastrichtian of the Caribbean Province of Kauffman (1973), and is considered, by subjective synonymy, to include T. coxi Grubic, 1979, as well as the other unquestionable records of T. sanchezi in the faunal province. An Arabian subspecies, T. s. milovanovici Grubic, 1979, is recognized from new specimens collected by ourselves from the Maastrichtian of eastern central Oman and the United Arab Emirates together with the single specimen from Sharjah Emirate, which constitutes the holotype for the former ‘T. milovanovici Grubic’. The only essential morphological difference between the two subspecies is in the angle (a) between the arete cardinale and the ventralrnost pillar in adult shells: that in T. s. sanchezi ranges from 50 to 126°, while, in T. s. milovanovici, this angle is from 12 to 75°. Palaeobiology. The extension of the inner margin of the RV beyond that of the LV and the recurvature of the shell growth laminations in the LV on to its smooth upper surface, in Torreites, indicates that marginal mantle tissue was freely exposed in life (text-fig. 10). It is considered likely that the mantle tissue, thus exposed, contained symbiotic zooxanthellae, as in the living Giant Clam, Tridacna. The externalization of the mantle tissue accounts for the atrophy of the (redundant) canal and pore system in the LV, diagnostic of other hippuritids. The upward growth tendency, and preference for shallow, well-lit marine settings, of Torreites, as indicated by sedimentological data, are consistent with the zooxanthellate hypothesis. SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 527 Palaeohiogeography. Three possible explanations for the apparent disjunct endemism of Torreites (along with certain other shallow marine benthic taxa) in the Caribbean and in Oman and the UAE are considered: (1) homeomorphy is rejected due to the negligible probability of several distinctive and constructionally independent diagnostic features arising in two coeval populations; (2) the plate tectonic drifting apart of originally neighbouring areas (as favoured by Grubic 1979) is rejected since all the available geotectonic evidence is against any possibility of the two regions having been conjoined in the Late Cretaceous; and (3) an episode of range extension between the regions, brought about by larval drift along a continuous but temporary chain of staging posts between them, is favoured by us. Of the two possible routes thus implicated, we prefer the trans-Pacific option to that via the Mediterranean Tethys and across the Atlantic. First, palaeobiogeographical data from the Mediterranean suggest that significant barriers to dispersal existed there by Campanian/Maastrichtian times (Kauffman 1973; Philip 1985). Secondly, the Atlantic is also known to have become a major barrier by this time (Kauffman 1973). In contrast, the equatorial Pacific Ocean floor is known to have been studded with shallow seamounts and islands, stocked by shallow marine benthos derived from the Caribbean, at this time (Schlanger et al. 1981). These, combined with the shores and/or other shallow marine promontories of eastern Tethys could have served as staging posts for the trans-Pacific dispersal of Torreites and the other taxa sharing its strikingly disjunct distribution. Acknowledgements. This paper is published with the permission of Amoco Production Co., USA, who funded the fieldwork, and the Ministry of Petroleum and Minerals of the Sultanate of Oman. We are very grateful to the staff of the Earth Resources Institute at the University College of Swansea, UK, who organized the fieldwork and provided helpful and genial company in the field. Valuable advice and criticism were provided by Dr N. F. Sohl (US Geological Survey) and Dr R. W. Scott (Amoco Production Co., Tulsa, USA). Any remaining errors or misinterpretations are, of course, the responsibility of the authors. Janet Dryden, John Taylor, and Helen Boxall (Open University, UK) assisted with the material preparation of the manuscript. REFERENCES AUDLEY-CHARLES, M. G., LATREiLLE, M. and NAYOAN, G. A. s. 1980. Comparison of orogenic features of the Tethyan mountain belt from the Himalayas to the East Asian arcs. Mem. Bur. Rech. geol. minieres., (Fr.), 115, 155-165. BECKMANN, j. p. 1976. Shallow-water foraminifera and associated microfossils from Sites 315, 316 and 318, DSDP leg 33. In schlanger, s. o. et al. (eds.). Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 33, 467-490. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. berggren, w. a. and hollister, c. d. 1974. Paleogeography, paleobiogeography and the history of circulation in the Atlantic Ocean. In hay, w. w. (ed.). Studies in Paleo-oceanography. Spec. Pubis.. Soc. econ. Palaeont. and Miner.. Tulsa. 20, 126 186. Tulsa, Oklahoma. 1977. Plate tectonics and paleocirculation— commotion in the ocean. Tectonophysics. 38, 1 1 48. CHUBB, L. j. 1956. Thyrastylon. a new rudist genus from the Upper Cretaceous of Guatemala, the Antilles, and Persia, with a discussion of the functions of rudist osculcs and pillars. Palaeontogr. Am. 4, 31 48. 1971. Rudists of Jamaica. Ibid., 7, 162-257. COATES, A. G. 1973. Cretaceous Tethyan coral-rudist biogeography related to the evolution of the Atlantic Ocean. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 12, 169-174. cowEN, R. 1983. Algal symbiosis and its recognition in the fossil record. In tevesz, m. j. s. and mccall, p. l. (eds.). Biotic interactions in Recent and fossil benthic communities. Topics in Geobiology. 3, 431 479. Plenum Publishing, New York. DE LA TORRE, A., JAKUS, p. and DE ALBEAR, J. F. 1978. Nuevos datos sobre las asociaciones de rudistas en Cuba. In MACGiLLAVRY, H. J. and BEETS, D. J. (eds.). The 8th Caribbean Geological conference (Willemstad, 1977). Geologic. Mijnb. 57, 143-150. DiLLEY, F. c. 1973. Cretaceous larger foraminifera. In hallam, a. (ed.). Atlas of palaeobiogeograpliy. 403-419. Elsevier, Amsterdam. DOUVILLE, H. 1890-1897. Etude sur les Rudistes— Revision des principales especes d’Hippurites. Mem. Soc. geol. Fr. Paleont. 6, 1 -236. 528 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 DOUViLLE, H. 1910. Etudes sur les Rudistes: Rudistes de Sidle, d’Algerie, d’Egypte, du Liban et de la Perse. Mav. Soc. geol. Fr. Paleont. 41, 1 84. 1927. Nouveaux rudistes du Cretace de Cuba. Bull. Soc. gk)l. Fr. (4), 27 (4), 49 56. ELLIOTT, G. F. 1981. The Tethyan dispersal of some chlorophyte algae subsequent to the Palaeozoic. Palaeo- geogr., PalaeoclimatoL, Palaeoecol. 32, 341-358. FOREY, p. L. 1981. Biogeography— Introduction. In forey, p. l. (ed.). The evolving biosphere, 241-245. British Museum (Natural History) and Cambridge University Press. GLENNIE, K. w. 1977. Outline of the geology of Oman. Mem. h. ser. Soc. geol. Fr. 8, 25-31. GORDON, w. A. 1973. Marine life and ocean surface currents in the Cretaceous. J. Geol. 81, 269-284. GORIN, G. E., RACZ, L. G. and WALTER, M. R. 1982. Late Precambrian-Cambrian sediments of Huqf Group, Sultanate of Oman. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 66, 2609-2627. GRUBic, A. 1979. Torreites milovanovici sp. nov. iz Omana, T. coxi sp. nov. i T. chubhi sp. nov. sa Jamajke, nov prikaz roda Torreites Palmer i osvrt na znacajnjegovog paleogeografskog rasprostranjenja. Vesn. zavod Geol. i Geqfiz. istraz. 37 (A), 81-95. [In Serbo-Croat with an English summary.] HARRIS, p. M., FROST, s. H., SEiGLiE, G. A. and SCHNEIDERMANN, N. 1984. Regional unconformities and depo- sitional cycles, Cretaceous of the Arabian Peninsula. In schlee, j. s. (ed.). Interregional unconformities and hydrocarbon accumulation. Mem. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 36, 67-80. HAWKINS, H. L. 1924. Notes on a new collection of fossil Echinoidea from Jamaica. Geol. Mag. 61, 312-316. herm, d., WEiDiCH, K. F., WILLEMS. H., CHUNHUi, Y., BiNGGAO, z. and SHiLAN, z. 1985. Marine sediments and faunas of Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in southern Xizang (Tibet, China) — 1. Terra Cognita, 5, 264. [Abstract.] JUNG, P. 1970. Torreites sanchezi (Douville) from Jamaica. Palaeontogr. Am. 7, 1-13. KAUFFMAN, E. G. 1973. Crctaccous Bivalvia. In hallam, a. (ed.). Atlas of palaeobiogeography, 353-383. Elsevier, Amsterdam. and SOHL, n. f. 1974. Structure and evolution of Antillean Cretaceous rudist frameworks. Verb, naturf. Ges. Basel. 84, 399 467. KOLLMANN H. A. and SOHL, N. F. 1980. Western Hemisphere Cretaceous Itieriidae gastropods. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 1125-A, 115. KONiSHi, K. 1985. Cretaceous reefal fossils dredged from two seamounts of the Ogasawara Plateau. In kobay- ASHi, K. (ed.). Preliminary report of the Hakuho Mai n Cruise KH 84-1, 169 179. Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo. KUHN, o. 1937. Morphologisch-anatomische Untersuchungen an Rudisten. I. Die Siphonen der Hippuriten. Zentbl. Miner. Geol. Paldeont. Abt. B, 5, 229-240. LLOYD, c. R. 1982. The mid-Cretaceous Earth: paleogeography; ocean circulation and temperature; atmo- spheric circulation. J. Geol. 90, 393-413. LUYENDYK, K. p., FORSYTH, D. and PHILLIPS, J. D. 1972. Experimental approach to the paleocirculation of the oceanic surface waters. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 83, 2649 2664. MACGILLAVRY, H. J. 1937. Geology of the Province of Camaguey, Cuba with revisional studies in rudist paleonto- logy. Utrecht Rijks-Univ., Geogr. Geol. Meded., Phys. Geol. Reeks Diss. No. 14, 168 pp. Amsterdam. MATTHEWS, s. c. 1973. Notes on open nomenclature and on synonymy lists. Palaeontology, 16, 713 719. MATTSON, p. H. and LEWIS, J. F. 1980. Structural trends and tectonic history of the northern Caribbean. Man. Bur. Rech. geol. minieres., (Fr.), 115, 30-37. MAYR, E. 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution, 453 pp. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. MUELLERRIED, F. K. G. 1930. El FUppurittes [iic] calamitiformis Barcena. An. Inst. Biol. Univ. Mex. 1 (2), 169- 174. 1936. Estratigrafia Preterciaria preliminar del Estado de Chiapas. Bol. Soc. geol. Mex. 9(1), 31 -41 . MURRis, R. J. 1980. Middle East: stratigraphic evolution and oil habitat. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 64, 597- 618. PALMER, R. H. 1933. Nuevos rudistas de Cuba. Revta. Agric. Habana, 14 (15-16), 95 125. PHILIP, J. 1972. Paleoecologie des formations a rudistes du Cretace Superieur — L’exemple du Sud-Est de la France. Pcdaeogeogr., PalaeoclimatoL, Palaeoecol. 12, 205-222. 1983. Le Campanien et le Maastrichtien a rudistes et grands foraminiferes de Quatretonda (Province de Valence, Espagne): une clef pour la biozonation et les correlations stratigraphiques dans le domaine meso- geen. Geol. Mediterr. 10 (3-4), 87-98. 1985. Sur les relations des marges tethysiennes au Campanien et au Maastrichtien deduites de la distri- bution des rudistes. Bull. Soc. geol. Fr. (8), 1 (5), 723 731. SKELTON AND WRIGHT: ISLAND-HOPPING RUDIST 529 RUTTEN, M. G. 1936. Rudistids from the Cretaceous of northern Santa Clara Province, Cuba. J. Paleont. 10, 134 142. SCHLANGER, s. o., JENKYNS, H. c. and PREMOLi-siLVA, I. 1981. Volcanism and vertical tectonics in the Pacihc Basin related to global Cretaceous transgressions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 52, 435-449. SIMPSON, G. G. 1962. Evolution and geography, 64 pp. Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene. SKELTON, p. w. 1976. Functional morphology of the Hippuritidac. Lethaia, 9, 83 100. 1979(7. Preserved ligament in a radiolitid rudist bivalve and its implication of mantle marginal feeding in the group. Paleobiology, 5, 90 106. 1979/). Gregariousness and proto-cooperation in rudists (Bivalvia). In larwood, g. and rosen, b. r. (cds.). Biology and Systeniatics of Colonial Organisms. Syst. Assoc, spec. Vol. 11, 257-279. Academic Press, Eondon and New York. 1982. Aptian and Barremian rudist bivalves of the New World: some Old World similarities. Cretaceous Research, 3, ]45 153. SMITH, A. G. and BRIDEN, J. c. 1977. Mesozoic and Cenozoic pcdeocontinental maps, 63 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. SOHL, N. F. and kollmann, h. a. 1985. Cretaceous actaeonellid gastropods from the Western Hemisphere. Prof. Pap., U.S. geol. Surv. 1304, 1-108. TAPPONNiER, p., MATTAUER, M., PROUST, F. and CASSAiGNEAU, c. 1981. Mcsozoic opliiolites, sutures, and large- scale tectonic movements in Afghanistan. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 52, 355 371 . VAN DOMMELEN, H. 1971. Ontogcnctic, phylogenetic and taxonomic studies of the American species of Pseudo- vaccinites and of Torreites and the multiple-fold hippuritids. Ph.D. thesis (unpublished), 125 pp. University of Amsterdam. VOGEL, K. 1975. Endosymbiotic algae in rudists? Palaeogeogr., PalaeoclimatoL, Palaeoecol. 17, 327-332. WINTERER, E. L. and METZLER, c. V. 1984. Origin and subsidence of guyots in Mid-Pacific Mountains. J. geophys. Res. 89 (B12), 9969 9979. ZIEGLER, A. M., SCOTESE, c. R. and BARRETT, s. F. 1983. Mesozoic and Cenozoic palcogeographic maps. In BROSCHE, p. and sundermann, j. Tided friction and the Earth's rotation II, 240-252. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. PETER W. SKELTON Department of Earth Sciences Open University, Walton Hall Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK Typescript received I March 1986 Revised typescript received 12 September 1986 V. PAUL WRIGHT Department of Geology University of Bristol Wills Memorial Building Queen’s Road Bristol BS8 1 RJ, UK , ;A- f ' ■■■ ...:/' ■; ,. ■■■■ , •■■■ If-. r^( • I > A REINTERPRETATION OF ICHTHYOSAUR SWIMMING AND BUOYANCY by MICHAEL ALAN TAYLOR Abstract. A new functional analysis of the reversed heterocercal caudal fin of ichthyosaurs suggests that its function, other than propulsion, was not control of buoyancy, but to produce powerful downwards pitching moments. These moments were used to initiate manoeuvres, to dive after breathing at the surface, and, in one form, to feed. This model is of potential value in analysing the palaeobiology and evolution of ichthyosaurs and other marine reptiles with similar caudal fins. The caudal fin of ichthyosaurs is usually assumed to have had the primary function of propelling the animal, but this does not explain why many ichthyosaurs had a caudal fin of the reversed heterocercal type, with a fleshy dorsal lobe, and a ventral lobe containing the terminal vertebral column. Previous studies have inverted existing analyses of the unreversed heterocercal caudal fin of sharks (e.g. Alexander 1974) to conclude that the secondary role of the ichthyosaurian caudal fin was to neutralize positive buoyancy (McGowan 1973). I here apply a new analysis of the shark caudal fin by Thomson (1976) and Thomson and Simanek (1977) to conclude that the secondary role of the ichthyosaurian caudal fin was, rather, to initiate manoeuvres. Furthermore, this new analysis indicates potential new evidence for the palaeobiology of different ichthyosaurs and for the reasons behind the evolution of the reversed heterocercal caudal fin in ichthyosaurs and other marine reptiles. FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS Previous analyses of the swimming and buoyancy of ichthyosaurs (McGowan 1973; Wade 1984) assume that each ichthyosaur was lighter than water and reconstruct the caudal fin as producing a forwards and slightly downwards directed thrust (text-fig. 1a). The downwards component of this thrust has the function of neutralizing part of the upthrust from the negative buoyancy; the remainder of this upthrust is neutralized by lift forces produced by the pectoral fins. The pectoral fins are assumed to be anterior to the centre of balance so that the moment which they produce about the centre of balance is in the opposite sense to, and therefore balances, that produced by the caudal fin. However, by inversion, this analysis is subject to some of the criticisms directed at the original analysis of the shark caudal fin (Alexander 1974; Thomson 1976; Thomson and Simanek 1977). The lift and drag forces vary with speed while the weight and buoyancy remain constant, leading to shifts in the overall balance of forces. In many sharks, and possibly in ichthyosaurs, the pectoral fins are so close to the centre of balance that they have disproportionately short lever arms about the centre of balance and so have to produce large lift and correspondingly large drag forces to counter the moment produced by the caudal fin, with its much longer lever arm (although this could have been alleviated by the use of the pelvic fins). Most importantly, ichthyosaurs were not necessarily lighter than water, and their buoyancy varied with factors such as fatness, repletion or starvation, pregnancy, and above all, the depth of water above the immersed animal (Wade 1984). During a dive, the increase of pressure with depth would compress the air in the lungs and lead to rapid increases in overall density and loss of positive buoyancy and gain of negative buoyancy, as in modern reptiles (Seymour 1982). The ichthyosaur would have had to cope with rapid changes in the magnitude and polarity of its buoyancy. IPalaeontology, Vol. 30, Part 3, 1987, pp. 531-535.| © The Palaeontological Association 532 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TEXT-FIG. 1 . Old and new models of forces acting on a swimming ichthyosaur. B. upthrust or downthrust due to buoyancy; CB, centre of balance; D, drag; P, hydrodynamic downthrust from pectoral and perhaps pelvic fins; T, propulsive thrust from caudal fin. a, old model, assuming positive buoyancy. The caudal fin’s thrust is directed forwards and downwards and has the role of partially counteracting the positive buoyancy. The lift from the pectoral fins counteracts the remaining buoyancy and its moment about the centre of balance counters that from the caudal fin. b, new model, showing how the caudal fin’s thrust is forwardly and upwardly directed so as to pass close to or through the centre of balance in normal swimming. The lift from the pectoral (and perhaps pelvic) fins serves only to neutralize upwards or downwards forces remaining from the addition of the upwards component of the caudal fin’s thrust to any positive or negative buoyancy. This is the worst case, when the animal is at the surface and positive buoyancy is greatest, and the pectoral and pelvic fins produce lift and therefore drag, c, new model, when the animal has dived to just below neutral depth and it has slight negative buoyancy. The upwards component of the caudal fin’s thrust cancels out the negative buoyancy, and the pectoral and pelvic fins need to produce no lift. This is the most efficient situation. Hunting or cruising ichthyosaurs would probably swim in this efficient manner. The new analysis of the shark caudal fin by Thomson (1976) and Thomson and Simanek (1977) can be inverted to reinterpret the ichthyosaurian caudal fin (text-fig. 1b). The propulsive force from the caudal fin is directed forwards and slightly upwards. Its angle with the horizontal can be varied by controlling the beat of the dorsal and ventral lobes, as in sharks. In an ichthyosaur swimming straight and level, the line of thrust passes through the centre of balance, and the pectoral fins need TAYLOR: ICHTHYOSAUR SWIMMING 533 produce only enough lift to compensate for residual up- or down-thrust remaining when the tail’s downthrust is added to any positive or negative buoyancy. The lines of thrust from the caudal and pectoral fins pass through, or close to, the centre of balance, so that little or no moments are produced about it and correspondingly little lift and drag are wasted on balancing these moments. The ichthyosaur can now control its buoyancy of whatever magnitude or direction. produces a strong downwards pitching action which can be used (as here) when starting diving during breathing at the surface, or can be turned into any other manceuvre by use of the pectoral and pelvic fins. The secondary role of the caudal fin is in manoeuvring, as in sharks (Thomson 1976; Thomson and Simanek 1977). The ichthyosaur would initiate a turn by raising the line of thrust of the tail above the centre of balance, producing a strong downwards pitching moment which could be converted by the pectoral and pelvic fins into a turn in any required direction (text-fig. 2). Flexion of the body and tail would contribute to this pitching effect (Appleby 1979). In sharks the positively heterocercal caudal fin produces an upwards pitching action which brings the ventrally located but protrusible mouth into action against prey. By contrast, ichthyosaurs had terminally located narrow rostra. The inverted heterocercal caudal fin would, however, have allowed these air-breathing animals to breathe at the surface. Swimming at, or just below, the water surface is energetically costly because of drag caused by surface turbulence and the production of bow waves (Goldspink 1977). The ichthyosaur could swim up to the surface, start pitching downwards at the surface, and already be diving while it breathed through the nostrils placed high on the sides of the snout just in front of the eyes (text-fig. 2). A strong diving action is particularly important since the animal is most buoyant at the surface. On the face of it the new analysis of ichthyosaur swimming incorporates an apparent inefficiency (text-fig. fu). Any positive buoyancy adds to the upwards component of the caudal fin thrust to produce an upthrust which must be neutralized by the production of lift, and therefore drag, by the pectoral and pelvic fins. However, this would be worst at the surface or at shallow depths, when swimming is in any case energetically costly. When the animal dived again, and especially if it exhaled, it would reach neutral depth and then, below that, a point where it became slightly negatively buoyant. At this point the buoyancy and the upthrust from the caudal fin would balance and there 534 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 30 TEXT-HG. 3. The head of Eurhinosaums showing the greatly undershot lower jaw (after McGowan 1979, pi. 5, fig. 2). Original c. 110 cm long. would be no need for the pectoral and pelvic fins to produce any lift, and associated drag (text- fig. Ic). The relative magnitude of the upwards component of the caudal fin thrust would depend upon the trade-off between efficient swimming and manoeuvrability, as has been suggested for sharks (Thomson 1976; Thomson and Simanek 1977). A relatively small upwards component, and thus a nearly horizontal line of thrust, would promote minimal drag and therefore high speed, or efficient cruising; a more sharply inclined line of thrust would produce greater manoeuvrability at the expense of efficiency. PALAEOBIOLOGICAL INFERENCES The aberrant ichthyosaur Eurhinosaums may provide evidence for this hypothesis. It had a long, tooth-armed upper jaw overhanging a much shorter lower jaw (text-fig. 3), and is reconstructed as having slashed downwards through shoals of small fish and cephalopods (McGowan 1979). The ability to pitch downwards strongly is implied by this habit. Further testing of the hypothesis may come from analysis of variation within ichthyosaurs. In sharks the variation of the caudal fin, especially in the degree of asymmetry about the horizontal axis, the angle of the terminal vertebral column with the horizontal, and the aspect ratio, has been correlated with the ecology of different forms, as this variation controls the angle with the horizontal made by the caudal fin thrust and therefore the balance between manoeuvrability and the energetic efficiency in terms of drag (Thomson 1976; Thomson and Simanek 1977). The existence of excep- tional cases of soft part preservation of ichthyosaurs (McGowan 1973, 1979; Martin et al., 1986) provides evidence for the outline of the caudal fin (so long as it is authentic, Riess 1985). This is an opportunity to correlate palaeobiological inferences from caudal fin form with independent evidence from overall body form, paired fin structure, and feeding adaptations, so as to reconstruct the palaeobiology of different ichthyosaurs and different age-classes within species, and test the present hypothesis of caudal fin function. The hypothesis of caudal fin function will also be relevant to studies of the origin and evolution of the ichthyosaurian reversed heterocercal caudal fin during evolution from terrestrial ancestors, and of the independently evolved reversed heterocercal caudal fin of other marine reptiles such as the thalattosuchian crocodilians (Buffetaut 1979). Acknowledgements. I thank Mr. J. Martin for access to work in press and Professor R. McNeill Alexander for comments. REFERENCES ALEXANDER, R. MCN. 1974. Functional design in fishes. 3rd edn. 160 pp. Hutchinson, London. APPLEBY, R. M. 1979. The affinities of Liassic and later ichthyosaurs. Palaeontology, 22, 921 946. TAYLOR: ICHTHYOSAUR SWIMMING 535 BUFFETAUT, E. 1 979. The evolution of the crocodilians. Sc7F«L 237 ( 1 0), 124 132. GOLDSPiNK, G. 1977. Energy cost of locomotion. In Alexander, r. mcn. and goldspink, g. (eds.). Mechanics and energetics of animal locomotion, 1 53 167. Chapman and Hall, London. MCGOWAN, c. 1973. Differential growth in three ichthyosaurs: Ichthyosaurus communis, I. hreviceps and Steno- pterygius cpiadriscissus (Rept., Ichthyosauria). Contr. R. Ont. Mus. Life Sci. 93, 1-21. 1979. A revision of the Lower Jurassic ichthyosaurs of Germany, with descriptions of two new species. Palaeontographica, A166, 93 135. MARTIN, J., FREY, E. and RiESS, J. 1986. Soft tissue preservation in ichthyosaurs and a stratigraphic review of the Lower Hettangian, of Barrow-upon-Soar, Leicestershire. Trans. Leicester lit. phil. Soc. 80, 58-72. RIESS, J. 1985. Biomechanics of ichthyosaurs. In riess, j. and frey, e. (eds.). Konstruktionsprinzipien lehender und ausgestorhener Reptilien. Principles of construction in fossil and recent reptiles, 199 205. Sondcrfor- schungbereich 230, Universities of Stuttgart and Tubingen, Stuttgart. SEYMOUR, R. s. 1982. Physiological adaptations to aquatic life. In gans, c. and pough, f. h. (eds.). Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 13, Physiology D. Physiological Ecology, 1 51. Academic Press, London. THOMSON, K. s. 1976. On the heterocercal tail in sharks. Paleobiology, 2, 19 38. and siMANEK, D. 1977. Body form and locomotion in sharks. Am. Zool. 17, 343-354. WADE, M. 1984. Platypterygius australis, an Australian Cretaceous ichthyosaur. Lethaia, 17, 99 1 1 3. MICHAEL ALAN TAYLOR Earth Sciences Section Leicestershire Museums Art Galleries and Records Services 96 New Walk Typescript received 8 August 1986 Leicester LEI 6TD Xj - { . ■ '> ■ • f '■ 's; * - i*' § 1 A NEW SILURIAN XIPHOSURAN FROM PODOLIA, UKRAINE, USSR by PAUL A. SELDEN and DANIEL M. DRYGANT Abstract. A single incomplete specimen of a xiphosuran, Pasfenuikevia podolica gen. et sp. nov., from the Ludlow Series of Podolia, Ukraine, USSR, is described. It has a smooth, spatulate carapace and rounded genal cornua. The opisthosoma bears nine free tergites (second to tenth); the first tergite is reduced and hidden beneath the carapace. The tergites have a broad axial region and small pleurae; the second tergite is hypertrophic. Telson and appendages are not preserved. P. podolica resembles Pseudonisats Nieszkowski, 1859 and Cyamocephaliis Currie, 1927; it is thus placed in the infraorder Pseudoniscina Eldredge, 1974, but certain characters are shared with the synziphosurines. It comes from the lagoonal deposits of the upper part of the Ustye Suite (Bagovytsa Horizon) where it occurred together with Baltoewyptems tetragonophthalmus (Fischer, 1839). AhoTAUUI. OmicyeTbCM e/riinnii HcnoBHin'i CK3CMnA«p MCMoxBocxa Pastenuikevia podolica gen. et sp. nov. is Ay^AOBChKoro flpycy IIomAAS (YPCP) . npc/rcTaBAemifi Bin i Aa/i,KiiM AoriaTOBii/(HiiM Kapanai