V, ^ FOKTHE PEOPLE FOR EDVCATION FOR SCIENCE LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY A.M. N, ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA PAPERS & PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA ^ FOR THE YEAR 1919 With 27 Plates and 2 Text-Figures. .al:^ IT*" ■-■Aafc.'. ISSUED 6th MARCH. 1920 PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY. The Tasmanian Museum. Argyle Street, Hobart. 1920 Priee: Nine Shillings and Sixpence. Kou ii; The responsibility of the statements and opinions in the following papers and discussions rests with the individual authors and speakers; the Society merely places them on record. Printed by Oavies Brothers Limited, Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania, THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA. The Koval Society of Tasmania was founded on the 14tli Octo- ber, 1843, l>y His Excellency Sii- John Eardley Eardley Wilmot, Lieutenant Covernor of Van Diemen's Land, as "The Botani- cal and Horticultural Society of Van Diemen's Land." The Botanical Gardens in the Queen's Domain, near Hobart, were shortly afterwards placed under its management, and a grant of £4(JU a year towards their nuiintenance was made by the Government. In 1844, His Ex«>llency annount-i-d to the Society that Her Majestv the Queen had signified her con- sent to become its patron ; and that its designation should thenceforward \xi "The Royal Society of Van Diemen's Land for Horticulture, Botany, and the Advancement of Science." In 1848 the Society established the Tasmanian Museum ; and in 1849 it commenccKl the publication of its "'Papers and Pro- ceedings." In 1854 the Legislative Council of Tasmania by 'The Uoyal Society .\ct" made provision for vesting the property of the Society in trustees, and for othi'r matters connected with the management of its affairs. In ]8")o the i.ame of the Colony was changed to Tasnuinia, and the Society then became "The Royal Society of Tasmania for Horticulture, Hotany and the .\(l\ancoment of Science." In 18f)0 a piece of ground at tho cornier of Argvlc and Mac- quarie streots, Hobart. was given liy the Crown to the Society as a site for a Museum, and a giant of t.'i.OdO was made for tin- erection of a l)uilding. I'he Society contiibutfd tl.80(» towards rhe cost, and thv ih-w .Muscnin Mas finished in 1*^02. In 188.") the Societ.v ga\e back to the Crown tin- liotanical Garden-; ami the Museum which, with the collections of tht^ Museum, wen- \ csted in a body of trustees, of whom six are chosen from the Society. In consideration of the services it had rendered in the promotion of rcience. and in the for- mation and management of the Muwum and Gardens, the right was reserved to the Society to liave exclusivoses cnniiefted with it. In inn the I'arliament of Tasmania, by "The IU)yal Society Act, 1911," created the Society a bodv corporate bv the name of ''Hie INiyal Society of Tasmania." with ]>erpetual succes- sion. The object of the Society is rleclnied l)y its Rules to be "the advancement of knowledge." His Majesty the King is Patron of the Society . and Hit Excellencv the Governor of Tasmania is Pre<^ident. ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 1919 CONTENTS Pasre Studies of Tasmaiiian Cetacea. Part I. (Orat qln flint ar, PseudovQii crassidens, (ylobicephahis melas). By H. H. Scott and Clive E. Lord ... 1 Notes on the Geology of Wineglass Bay. By W. H. Clemes IS On blie Occurrence in Ta.sniania of Hiidrux /)/ahn us. By Clive E. Lord •• 22 Studies of Tasmanian Oetacea. Hart 1 1 ( Zi{>luu.< cavi- vostriK). By H. H. Scotland Clive E. Lord 23 Notes on tlie Geology uf Maria Island. By \V. H. Clemes 33 The Early History of Maria Island. By Clive E. Lord ... 39 New Specit'.s of Tasnianiaii Mollu.sca, with criti<,'al remarks on .'^Rveral de.scribed .-ipecie.-^ and additions to the list. By W. L. May .5.5 A He-examination of Profe.ssor H.Hswell's types of Aus- tralian lycnof/nitid't . By Professor Flynn ... ... 70 Note on the Occurrence in Tasmania of the Freshwater Cvdh, Uymeniisoiiia lacustris. By Dr. Chilton 93 Studies of Tasnianian Cetacea. Part III. ( Tursiops lurxio). By H. H. Scott and Clive E. Ltjrd 96 Notes and Additions to the Fungus Flora of Tasmania. By L. Rodw^ay 110 Australian Rhyphido' and l.eptidcf ( Diptera). By G. H. Hardy 117 Notes on 'I'asnianian Whaling. By Dr. W. L. Crowther ... 1.30 Annual Report— Abstract of Proceedings 152 List of Members 1.57 Report 164 Obituary 165 Accounts ... 167 Index 168 PAPERS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA 1919 STUDIES OF TASMAXIAN CETACEA. Tari' 1. (Orra (jladiatar, I'xt lularcd cr(tfD CLIVE E. LORD. 3 ships were fitted out. This revival lasted for about fifteen years, and then the decline commenced until in the earlv nineties the whaler Waterwitch was the sole vessel engaged. It is of interest to recall the fact that William Lanny ("King Billy"), the last Tasnianian male aboriginal, follow- ed the calling of a whaler. He made his final voyage in the Rinunjniffle, and was paid off on February 26th, 1S69, and died a few days later 1-*^^'. INTRODUCTION. Students of the Tasmanian Cetacea have for many years been in search of some Tasmanian records relating to the munificent osteological presentations made to several English scientific institutions l)y the late Dr. "\V. L. Crowther. Siiico the year 1902 Mr. Srott has been work- ing on the Tasmanian Ceiarea '"j , and has been most anxi- ous to obtain Tasmanian records relating to the late Dr. Crowther s collections for the purpose of investigating the question of the comparative anatomy of certain species. Upon Mr. Lord's appointment as Curator of the Tasman- ian Museum a thorough overhaul of the Museum store speci- mens was made with the result that a series of hitherto undcscribed specimens were brought to light. As certain of these were undoubtedly ]iortion of the Crowther collec- tion a thorough investigation was decided upon. Upon this being made a considerable amoimt of interesting data was obtained, which appeared well worthy of being placed on record, and the following notes are therefore the result of our observations. Between the years 1866 and 1871 the late Dr. W. L. Crcwther. of Hobart, who was intei'ested in the whaling industry, collected a large number of skeletal remains of various Tasmanian Cetdmi, and presented them to several English Museums. Some of these specimens still claim folios in the Catalogues of the British Museum and the Royal College of Surgeons' Museum. Mr. Scott made an effort in 1902 to trace some of Dr. Ci-owther's specimens in the State, as he was then engaged in publishing a series of articles on this subject. At that time his inquiries did not meet with success, hut the matter was always kept in mind. Owing to the recent revision of the Basement stores of the Tasmanian Museum some old boxes which had evidently l>een stored away from the time they were moved from the old Museum of the Royal Society to the present building (4a) Bonwick. The Last of the Tasmanians, p. 395. (5) Scott. Lnunceston Courier. 1902. Scott. Notes on a fossil whale from Wynyard, Pap. and Proc. Roy. Soc. Tas., 1913, p. 167. 4 STUDIES OF TASMANIAN CETACEA, were discovered. These were found to contain interesting osteological specimens, the majority of which related to the Crowther presentations. A rough examination disclosed that the collection con- sisted of three more or less complete skeletons probably re- lating to Glohicephahis, the skull and portion of a skeleton of a killer whale. Also included there were two skeletons (without skulls) of the Dugong {Halicore australis). In addition to the foregoing a skull from the Museum store collection labelled "E pidon chafhamensis" (6) was examined for purposes of comparison, and also an articulated skele- ton of a "Killer," made in 1868, together with a larger skull. When we recall the fact that the late Dr. W. L. Crowther from the year 1866 onward continued to collect and forward to the Museum of the Royal College of Sui'- geons a wonderful series of Cetacean remains — that in totaj. embraced 34 Catalogue folios and in Classification 8 genera of whales — it would have been remarkable if he had not presented some specimens to the local Museum. The late Dr. Crowther's gifts to the greatest Museum of compara- tive anatomy in the Vi'crJd, included no less than 15 full skeletons of whales — splendidly prepared and ready for articulation upon arrival in England. The Tasmanian Scientific world seems to have largely lest sight of the en- thusiasm thus manifested by one who lived and worked amongst us, and we wish to appreciatively recall Dr. Crowther's extensive and practical studies among the Tas- manian Cetacea. Before concluding these introductory remarks it is of interest to note that Dr. Crowther forwa,rded from Tas- mania to the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons a representative of the genus Vlymcnia. As this species has not been placed on the Tasmanian list the donation by Dr. Crowther is worth;/ of attention, and eifoi'ts should be made to trace this species in Tasmanian seas. There is a chance, however, that the specimen forwarded to England may have been obtained by one of Dr. Crowther's whalers on the high seas many miles from Tasmania. The particular species referred to is figured in the Zoology of the Voyage of the Erebus and Terror, Mam- malia, Vol. I., PI. 15, and is there designated Delpliinop- ferus picronii . It is notable for the absence of the dorsal fin, and the fact that the beak, pectoral fins, and under part of the body are white. (6) Lord Notes Mammals of Tasmania, P. and P. Roy. Soc. Tas. 1918. p. 29. BY H. H. SCOTT AND CLIVE E. LOUD. 5 CONSPECTUS. In the present instance our investigations extended to the following specimens of the Tasmanian Museum col- lections : — 1. One complete articulated skeleton Avhich was label- led "Skeleton of Killer (Orm pnrifirn) from Adventure Bay, Tasmania. Prepared and articulated by T. Roblin, Curator of the Museum 1868." 2. One skull complete with lower jaw, which was labelled ''Pseudorca meridinunh, Donor, W. L. Crcwther, Esqr." This specimen was in a splendid state of presei-vation. 3. One skull, similar character to No. 2, but not in such a good state of presen-ation. The lower jaw and teeth are missing. 4. A large portion of the skeleton belonging to the previous skull. 5. Complete skeleton, including skull of Glohicepha- liis tnehix. (Adult male.) 6. Ditto. (Immature male.) 7. Ditto. (Female — skull missing.) 8. Skull of (ihihiccphdlitx iiir/as. 9. Skull of Beaked whale labelled "Epitlmi r/,(tfliiii)ini- In the present instance we have dealt with the first eight of this series, and it is our intention to consider the characteristics of the remainder in future papers, together with such facts relating to other me.Tibers of the Tasmanian Cttdcni as may be obtained from time to time. PSEtlDORCA CRASSIDENS (Plate No. I.) riiiicaiiit rrassii/ens, Owen, British Fossil Mammals and Birds, p. 516 (1846). Pxeudorra rraotiflciia, Reinhai'dt, Recent Memoirs of Cetacea, Ray Society (Nov. 7th, 1862). Orra mtridinnnlix, Flower, Proc. Zoological Society of Lon- don, p. 420 (1864). Attention was first paid to specimen No. 1 , which consisted of a complete articulated skeleton bearing the label "Skeleton of Killer" (Orm /xirlfica) from Adventure Bay, Tasmania. (Prepared and Articulated 1)v T. Roblin, Curator of the Museum 18GS). 6 STUDIKS OF TASMANIAN CETACEA, Upon a comparison being made of the two skulls (Specimens No. 2 and 3) with this articulated specimen, and an examination of the leading generic characters of both, it was resolved to make a rough comparison between this skeleton and the dimensions given in the original de- scription (".' of the Psenclorca crassidens of Reinhardt. 'i'he results showed such a striking similarity between the two specimens that a series of comjiarative measui'ements were made, as shown in the following tables. These proved con- clusively that the articulated skeleton was a good example of Pxeudorco crass/dens. As we know it came from Adven- ture Bay it is almost certain to be uortion of the Crowther collection and to be one of the mixed school which came ashore there. It is known that the school consisted of representatives of the following species: — Globicejdialui^ iiieJas, Orca (jladiaior, and P>. 7 well as being an cxtremelv valuable IMuscuni exhibit. (See Plate No. I.) PSEUDORCA CRASSIDEXS. General osteological notes upon the Tasmanian skele- ton, and a comparative table cf measurements of the larg- est, lumbar vertebrje of that skeleton, with Reinhardts male from Middlefart. The skull in a wide sense is that of a small "OraJ' and Ihe teeth conform to the O/w/ type, in having recurved crowns, but of course are much smaller, as indicated bv the following comparison with a true Orcn's teeth, measured directly for this special purpose. i'sr,ri)(tu( .\. nui \. Indies I iiiclie (Oi Total lengtU of the largest tooth in the j upper jaw ... ... .. ... ... ... 1 ' 2 (iirtli of same ... ... ... ... ... ... '.Vi, S,' ('••) Leni'>itpx, while in the Orra, the whole boundary walls of these fossje bend outwards, as continuous outgrowths of the occiput. In the skeleton it may be noted that five of the cer- vical vertebrae are strongly ankyloscd together, and two are quite free. A mctapophysis appeal's — faintly indicated — upon the second dorsal, and well marked one upon the fourth. The seventh doi-sal develops these processes at the upper level of the neural arch, in other words at the base of the neural spine. Unlike the 5;ma\lcr dolphins, these processes are not eliminated from the v?rtebra; in the region of the dorsal fin, but continue to gradually decrease aftor the (9) This is ex-alveolar, enamel surface measurement. O STUDIES OF TASMANIAN OETACEA, sixth himbar has been reached, eventually ending, in fofo, at the ninth vertebra from the candal extremity. The maniis is wider than that of such dolphins as Globiceplia- lus and Tursiops, and the longest finger only develops seven phalanges, instead of eighteen, as in the case of Glohirep/ia/us. The ossicles present are apparently the following : — Proximal row — Scaphoid. Lunare. Cuneiform. Distal row — Trapezoid. Magnum. Unciform. In each hand the cuneiform is closely attached by immersed cartilage, to the ulna, and as the whale was im- mature it might have ankylosed later in life had the ani- mal continued to live. Pseud area rrassidens. Comporative skulls of well authenticated specimens. Adult skull iu the Skull and skeleton in Tasniniiian JIu>euiii, Iloliart, Tasiiuuiia. Royal College of Skull of Reinhavdt's Prof. Owens fossil skull. ■Surgeons' Specimen ^ Jlnseuni, J/ondoii. SKUr.L. SKULL. SKULL. SKULL. 1 a-hos inches inches - 1 iiK-lies mutilated Beak to condyles 24 23i circit i 24 Maxillary no! eh to tij) of Leak 12 Hi 11 1-^4 Brea(itli across tlie zy;;oniatic processes of the squMUiosal 15 13 14 1 12 j No daia oivcn Height at vertex of tlie skull 10 n No data No data Breadth acio:?s ridges of fossa' tetnjioralis Sa No data 8i No data lireadth of beak at notch n n 8 1-12 8i- Brcadtli across tlie beak in rejiion of thinl tooth from end of s.^ies "'h No data 7i 8 Breadth of theinterniaxillaries fNn data I 51 and the intei'venino; space Jjcngth of rij^lit ramus of the 5| ^ 5i mandible, tip to jiosterior ed'^e of last t'loth .. 9i 9:f 9 512 10 Length of the dental series of the upper jaw 10 No data n 10 Height of right lainus at the coronoid procei-s 5 s ■') No data No data Total length of the right ramus of the mandible m 19 ]8i 21 BY H. H. SCOTT AND CLIVE E. LORD. Pseudorca crassidens. Comparative measurements of the Tasmanian and North Sea specimens. SI,eUfi)U.<. — Reinl ariit':^ male Tasmanian Specimen from Ailventure liay. specimen from Midillefart. feet inches feet inches Total leni;th of tl.e skeleton ... '" 14 G n it Lenj,'tli ot seven cervical vertelir;i> U ■H U H Length of luiiil)ar series ro the vertebra' with the tiist li;rinajio|)hysis 3 ^i 3 n Total lei-.;,'th of candais I'O' 5 84, 5 H lireailth of the Inrgest luinhar 1 01 1 0 5-6 Height of Mai)nla from middle of arti- cular cavity to niidille of supra- scajiuhir lini ... 0 8i 0 7.^ Greatest lirciulth of the scapula 0 lU 0 HI 5-6 Length of Huineru.s 0 4.1, u •H Do. of Kadin.s ... 0 5 0 4 7-12 J)o. ofUlna u ;") (1 :n Distal width of both arm bones u 5| 0 r^h Length of the nianits iti a recent and nniliied condition no data 1 0 ORCA GLADIATOR. (prca capensit.) Plates II., III.. IV., V., VI., VII., VIII. Fcr detailed synonymy see: — Gray, B.M. Cat. Seals and Whales (1866), p. 278-290. The prevailing opinion seems to favour the reduction of the representatives of this genus to one species — Orra gladiator. We have adopted this view and made Orra capenxis a synonym of Orra (jladiator. Should, however, rapensis be again raised to specific rank we are of opinion that the Tasmanian forms should be included, as they appear to have the characters at one time allotted to rajitnsts in order to separate it from ijladiator. We formed this opinion after comparing the Tasmanian skulls with the figured ones of Orrti rapenxia reproduced by Gray in the Zoology of the Vovage of the Erebus and Terror. (Plate IX.) ^ ^ Unfortunately portions of the skeleton examined by us had disappeared. This is greatly to be regretted, es- (10) In this articulated skeleton (Plate I.), the intervertebral pads are thiek. in fact exceptionally so, and if this excess is allowed for, the two skeletons are of almost similar length. 10 STUDIES OF TASMANIAN CETACEA, pecially as the mandible was one of the missing portions. As a recompense, however, there was a second complete skull, in a splendid state of preservation, which permitted a series of comparative measurements being taken. This skull formed part of the Crowther collection, and bore elo- quent testimony regarding the confusion of species previ- ousl}- alluded to. It was labelled "'Fseudurca merhlionalis — Donor, M^ L. Crowther, Esqr," but there can be no doubt that its correct classification is that of Orca. Whether gladiator, or capensis, is a matter of individual opinion, but we would again draw attention to the fact that whales vaiy greatly as regards sex and age characteristics, and far too many species in the past have been created on insuffi- cient evidence. We desire particularly to refrain from adding further to the confused nomenclature, and prefer to treat the present example as a member of the cosmopoli- tan species 0. ffladiator. Orca gladiator. A detached skull, and a skull with many of the asso- ciated bones of the skeleton, exist in the Museum collec- tion, and unless otherwise stated the notes given herewith relate to the latter. Skull. The skull is extremely heavy in build, following the general contour of the true dolphins with wide, even mas- sive, squamosal regions, notched beak, and maxillary bosses two inches — or more — in thickness. The vertex gives characters that by reason of its squared ridges distinguish it immediately from Glohicephalus, and in part from the Fsendorca. This skull — which unfortunately is devoid of a man- dible— is three feet three and a half inches long, two feet two inches wide, and one foot five and a half inches high, from the par-occipital processes to the vertex. Its great- est maxillary width is in the region of the pre-orbital pro- cess of the frontal, where it yields a measurement of twenty-two inches, it then contracts to twenty inches at the notch (if we still follow the outline of the skull). Across the actual notch itself, we get a measurement of twelve inches nearly — and rather more at the middle of the beak. Viewed from below, it is of interest to note, that the intermaxillaries appear in the palate as a well marked pair of wedge shaped strips, some fourteen inches long — or half of the total palatal length. The vomer appears for four inches only, its apex being eleven inches from the tip of the beak. In Globiceplialiis the intermaxillaries only BY H. H. SCOTT AXD CLIVE K. LORD. 11 obtiTide upon the palate for three inches, out of a total length of fourteen, and the vomer is continued outwards to within two and a quarter inches of the tip of the beak. As far as it is possible to determine from the articulated skele- ton of Pseudorra, this latter whale followed the Orca, and not (Jlobicepha/ift in this respect, in any case it certainly followed Orra in having fairly extensive palatine moieties instead of the palatal bones being reduced to the merest strips as in (Thihiceplinlux. This character alone is suffi- cient to quickly separate skulls of Paeudorca from those •of Glohiocephahis. The second skull in the Museum collection (Plate II.) is an extremely well prepared rpecimcn, evidently cleaned under Doctor Crowther's strictest instinictions — the teeth aro all in situ, the membrane of the hard palate having been left for the purpose of their protection — nothing could exceed this method of making a museum specimen, as far as it relates to the teeth, but a central ai-ea left open to reveal the vomer, and intermaxillarics, would be a de- sideratum. In point of size, this second skull closely re- sembles the one just passed in review, bxit as it is in mucli better condition the table of measurements appended was compiled from it, and not the skull with the associated appendicular bones. Skull of an Orca, presented bv Dr. W. L. Cro\7ther, F.R.C.S' Plate II. ft. in. Total length 3 Vi Width at maxillary notch 1 1;^ Width at pre-orbital process of the frontal ...... 2 2{ Width of maxillary at this point 1 10 Height fi'om par-occipitals to vertex 1 5^ Greatest width of palate inside teeth 0 lO.V (Midway between the last two) Width at seVenth pair of teeth 0 9^ Total length of tooth line 1 ^ Width of^ pterygoids 0 6;^ Tips of pterygoids to the occipital condyles 1 H Width of fossa temporalis 0 ^ H"eight of fossa temporalis ••• 0 6^ (Both of the above taken from the palatal aspect.) Total length of malar bone 0 11^ Diameter of blowers taken from the palatal aspect — antero-posterior measurement 0 ^\ Transverse measurement 0 '^% 12 STDDIES OF TASMANIAN CETACEA, Uccipital condyles along- the curves — vertical measurement 0 8 Ditto transverse measurement 0 4^^ Total width of the ai-ticular and space taken along the curve 0 lOi Slehfon. Tlie cervical vertebrae, and the first dorsal, make such a compact series that for both illustrative and descriptive purposes they are here considered together (Plate III.)- The fii'st three cervicals are completely ankylosed, and the rest are quite free, this is in contrast to the Pseud orca, and GJ oh ice phalli fi, in which whales all the series are welded together into a solid mass. The neural spine of the axis slopes backwards at an angle of 45 degrees, and being some five inches in length, approaches the spine of the dorsal to within an inch and a quarter. The whole block measure nine and a quarter inches in antero-posterior extension, and the first pair of diapophyses yield a measurement of fifteen and a half inches across, the neural canal, taken through the atlas, is three and a half inches wide, and two and three-quarters high, »ud the first dorsal vertebra gives practically similar results. For the general contour of this block of vertebrae see the illustration, it being only necessary to add that the block is ten inches high, to the top of the neural spines. Dorsal Series. (Plate IV.) Four vertebrae of the dorsal series are illustrated to show general outline, and the progressive rise of the meta- pophyses upon the neural spines. The length of this block is twelve and three-fourth inches for the three, and the height of the neural spine of the tallest vertebra is thirteen and three-quarter inches, from the keel of the centrum. The reversed vertebra is that which of the series is nearest to the skull, and therefore the transverse processes (Dia- pophyses) are extremely short. As a guide to size, it may be said that the neural canal of this vertebra is four inches across, and the centrum measu]-es four and three-quarters in either direction. Ltniihars. (Plate V.) Four early himbars are shown, and a sequent fifth, re- versed as in the other illustrations. These vertebrse do not carry haemapophyses (Chevrons), and are, of course, rib- less. The metapophyses are still strongly developed, al- though from their position they perhaps might be called zygapophyses. BY H. H. SCOTT AND CLIVE E. LOl:D, 13 In the evolution of whales, the true zygapophyses ox the dorsal series have been overlapjDcd by the mctapophy- ses, that have in consequence suffered a complete atrophy. Clievron-hearin;/ Vertehra'- (Plate VI.) These vertebrae beautifully illustrate the reduction of the metapophyses upon the neural spines as we advance tailward. Haemad, they carry bony arches to protect the extensive blood vessels that go to nourish the powerful tail — such bones whicn relate to the vertebral haemal ai'ch may be designated either 'haemal arches, " or chevron bones. Stem inn of Orra. (Plate VII.) An excellent illustration of the sternum of this Orca is depicted. As will be noted the anterior moiety (manu- brium) is penetrated by a fossa, an inch and seven-eighths long, and one inch wide. The articular facets of four ribs arc manifest, the next few pairs being articulated by car- tilage to the distal (or ziphoid) end of the sternum. This aiTangement is to be seen in the articulated skeleton of the pseudorca shown in connection with the description of that animal. Fihx. (Plate VIII.) To practically illustrate the awful fights that "Killers" indulge in, and their incidental results, some of the ribs of this Orca have been photographed. These ribs are paired, and therefore the mutilated rib can be directly compared with its normal congener. Apparently this particular specimen was unusually unlucky, for having early in life broken several ribs upon one side, and tided over the mis- adventure, he lived to fare a second similar, but more ex- tensive, fracture upon the other side. This second accident was responsible for the awful distortions shown in the picture. GLOBICEPHALUS MELAS. (For detailed Synonymy see Gray, B.M. Cat. Whales, p 313, ef seq.). The specimens representing C/nhirfjiIid/iiK (Nos. 5, 6, 7 and 8) consisted of three skeletons, of which two were complete, and a non-associated skull (Plate IX.). These are undoubtedly specim3ns presented by the late Dr W. L. Crowther, and were evidently carefully prepared in order to show certain essential data. The three specimens may be classed as follows: — A. (No. 5) shows the characters of an adult male. B. (No. 6") shows the characters of an adult female. C. (No. 7) sho\vs the characters of an immature Glohi- n plioliix. 14 STUDIES OF TASMANIAN CETACEA, As the sex characters of all whales need working out, these specimens will supply data of extreme interest, and it is felt that the comparative tables given in the following pages will prove useful to students of the Cefacea in the future. It is of interest to note that the immature characters are v/ell marked off from the mature. Of this characteris- tic little or nothing has previously been published as far as we are aware. In the past whales belonging to the genus Glohi- fy/)JiaIu!i have been confused with specimens of Pseudorca. When they are compared casually this is not to^ be wonder- ed at. Their similar size, colour, and general external ap- jDearance all lend their aid to the confusion which has undoubtedly existed. Even Ziphoid v>diales have at times been incorporated. While the examination of the 2>resent series will, it is confidently hoped, prove of value, it is to be regretted that there are certain missing links. For the last fifty years apparently these valuable specimens have been stow- e:l away. From time to time there have been alterations ia the stores, and there is evidence which goes to show that a number of the missing parts relating to these skele- tons were evidently stored separately, and were disposed of some years ago as useless odd examples. This is greatly to be regretted, but sufficient remains, especially in the case of this species, to allow an exaniination of its chief charac- teristics, both as regards sex and age. Globicephalus melas. (Plate IX.) As (j'lohirejjhalus skulls have been confounded with those of the Pxeudorrn, it is important that their compara- tive osteologv sho'uld be made cleai\ The palatine charac- ter given under the heading of Orca, in this paper, will always serve to separate the skulls unless extreme mutila- tion (as in the case of a fossil specimen) makes it impos- sible to apply this test. — under such extreme circvimstances the following data may be consulted. r'o IV jiara five Gli a r act cm . (1) In GI()hice})h^ the maxillary wings practically cover the frontal upon all its faces, except at the vertex, where a narrow strip is left exposed. (2) In Pseudorca the frontal is well exposed all round, namely, for anything from half to three-quarters, of an inch, the greater amount being at the vertex, and tn© lesser along the orbit and fossa temporalis. (3) In GIohiccpJwIuR the pre-frontal moieties are BY ir. II. SCOTT AND CLIVE K. L58itication. (Animal almost adult— compare size of skull with that of the other male.) Twelve dorsal verte- bi;e measure, in an tero- posterior ex- tension—Sit. 2in. Epiphyses not anky- losed to centra of vertebra'. Total len<^th of verte- bral series, minus skull — 14ft. 6in. ADULT FEMALE. All cervicals anky- losed, not to extinc- tion, last two open, much super ossihca- cation. JSpiue of the axis blending strongly with those of the rest of the series. I'welve dorsals measure — 2ft. Tin. Epiphyses of ail verte- l)ric ankylosed to centra, and sutures extinct. Length of vertebral series— 10ft. lOin IMMATURE, o Cervicals ankylosed — ligiitly, l)nt firmly, excepttlie 7th,whicii is loose. Five sutures wide open. Right neuiapopliysis has not blended witli its fellow nioiety. Tsvelve dorsals measure — 2ft. 5Mn. All epiphyses quite free from the centra. Length series of vertebral - lOit. lOiin. ADUF/r MALE. ADULT FEMALE. IMMATURE. $ Ribs, 11 to 12 pairs. Ribs, 11 to 12 pair s. Ribs, 11 to 12 pairs. i nclies inches inches Twentieth verte- Twentieth verte- Twentieth verte- bra from skull. bra from skull. bra tron) skuli, width across width across width across diapophyses ... 15 diapophyses ... 11 diapophyses ... IS liengthof body.. 4 Lengtii of body ... 3* Lengtii of body... H Height to lip of Heigiit to tij) of Height to tip of spine IIJ. spine H spine yi Across centrum Si Across centrum ... 3 Across centrum m Vertical .. ... H Vertical 2S Vertical 3- Scai)uia. Sca])ula. Scapula. Glenoid to supra- Glenoid to .scapu- Glenoid to scapu- .scaimlar rim ... 10^ lar rim 9i lar rim 8^ Transverse 15i Transverse \U Transverse 124 From the above comparati\e measurements it will be manifest that the adult male exceeds the adult female, in size, by anything up to four feet, or over, and that an im- (11) Such as already siven by Beddard in .t Book of Whales and The Camhridoc Natural Hisiory {.Matnmals), etc. c^- <^' ^r^*^^ ^ t BY H. H. SCUTT AND CLIVK E. LORD. 1( mature male, with all the epiph\ses of the vel•tebr^e open, is close to the stature of the female. The following charac- ters were noted, as marking the female off from the mature and immatui'e males. 1. Diapophyses of the dorsal ribs longer than in the other two animals. 2. First, cei-vical, neural spine covers more vertebi"3e. 3. No bicipital groove between head and trochanter of the humerus. Articular surfaces set at a more oblique angle (I2i- 4. Supra scapular rim was centrally elevated, and not depressed, and the pre, and post, scapxilar fossje made n nearer approach to the roughened fossje of Tnrsia/is than either of the other specimens here detailed. We hope in our next paper to give exhaustive data re- lating to &ex variations in the genus y'lirsiaps, and the notes here supplied will receive added value from tne light thus thrown upon a vexed question. In conclusion, we desii'e to express our thanks to Mr. John Arnold, Chief Assistant cf the Tasmanian Museum, for the willing and courteous assistance rendered to us during the examination of the specimens. DESCRIPTION OF PLATP:S. Platf. I. Artif iilatod i^koleton of I'xt mlorrd rras.-ii(lenx from j^idventui-e Bay, Tasmania. Pl.\tk II. Skull of Orca iilnd nifor. Plate III. Cervical vertebra? and first dorsal of Orra (ihulinldr. Plate IV. Four vertebrae of the Dorsal Series {(). (jhtd .(itur). Plate V. Five vertebra? of the Lumbar series {(). fihidinlnr). Plate VI. Four chevron bearing vertebrae (0. fflailiator). Plate VII. Sternum of Orrn (ihidlatitr. Plate VIII. Series of Ribs of Orrn (jhidicitor (showing broken ribs). Plate IX. Skull of Glohicei'linlus iiieJax. (1'2) These arm bones are only provisionally associated with this skeleton, and may not belonc to it. Various dolphin remains — evidently odd scraps of later date than Dr. Crowther's specimens — had been added to the box from time to time; these included some TuTsiops bones of no value. ]8 NOTES ON THE GEOLOGY OF WINEGLASS BAY. By W. M. Clemes, B.A.. B.Sc. [Received 20th March, 1 !»]!». Read 14th April, 1919.] During a recent visit to Wineglass Bay I was enabled to make a cursory examination of the neighbourhood, and, as the locality has not been described in any detail, a few notes may be useful as a guide to future workers. Wineglass or Thouin Bay is situated on the eastern side of the isthmus joining Freycinet Peninsula to Schou- ten Main, whicli, together with Schouten Island, form the eastern boundary of Oyster or Fleurieu Bay. The whole consists of a magnificent series of granite peaks, extending for 12 miles in a north and south direction, the highest^ Mount Freycinet, rising to the height of 2,014ft. above the sea. This granite occurs in a meridional line, extend- ing from Flinders Island to the Hippolyte Rocks, off Tas- man Peninsula, and is contemporaneous with the granite massils of the West Coast. It is to be found penetrating all rocks earlier than the Permo-Carboniferous, but has not been seen intrusive in strata of a later age. It is usual- ly distinguished from the earlier granites and syenites by its uncrushed character, though in places it has been sub- jected to a certain amount of dynamic stress. The granite at Wineglass Bay varies considerably. The normal rock is a coarse-grained granite, pink with flesh-coloured orthoclase. The chief constituents are ortho- clase, quartz and biotite. The latter appears in green chloritised crystals, and is quite subordinate in quantity. In large boulders at the northern end of the beach ap- pears a medium-grained biotite-granite, the composition of which is quartz, biotite and felspar. Much of the lat- ter will probably be found to be plagioclastic. This is the more typical East Coast granite. Running through this are veins of granite porphyry, in which the ground mass lookg quartzose, with scattered crystals of quartz, biotite and muscovite throughout. In other veins there is a concen- tration of the biotite. A wide vein of this biotite-granite was reported as running up the hill from the water's edge on the northeni side of the bay, but I did not come across it. A broad vein about 20ft. wide is found on the south side of the bay. This is also a granite porphyry of mag- nificent appearance. It consists of pink orthoclase and quartz in a quartzose ground mass. The ferro-magnesian BY W. H. CLEMKS, 15. A.. li.SC. 1!> constituents are very few. Eunning through the boulders oh the sides of Mt. Hazard are to be found narrow veins of niicrogranite, a very fine-grained variety composed of felspar, biotite and quartz. On the northern side of the bay also occurred a highly porphyritic granite with large crystals of felspar (orthoclase ?), also quartz, biotite and muscovite. Numerous quartz veins trav»'rsi-->idfucf' rather than the result of the accumulation of drifting sand, though the rapid disintegra- tion would account for abundance of material. An inter- esting field of study would be the formUtion of the tied- islands and isthmuses of S.E. Tasmania. The amount of evidence here is very little, and no definite conclusions could be formed without further examination. There is no doubt that the peninsula was separated from Schouten Main just as at present Schouten Island is separated from the peninsula, and also that the different character of the rocks on the north and south side of the bay would lead to the conclusion that they represent Iwo quite distinct intratelluric intrusions, which were, however, approxi- mately contemporaneous, but further investigation must be left to a subsequent visit. In conclusion, I must ex- press my indebtedness to ]\Ir. Twelvetrees. who gave mo valuable assistance in checking the constituents of the rocks found, and especially in determining the composition of the diorite. 22 OX THE OCCURRENCE IN TASMANIA OF HYDRUS PLATURUS, Linn, d) By Clive E. Lord, Curator of the Tasmanian Museum. (Received 5th May, 1919. Read 10th June, 1919.) Tasmania is usually credited with three terrestrial and one aquatic snake. The latter species — P. lafiraudatus- — has only been noted on rare occasions. It is interest- ing, therefore, to record that a second aquatic species has bepn found on the Tasmanian Coast. A i^pecimen re- ■cently forwarded to the Museum from Scamander, on the East Coast, proves to be a typical example of the Spotted- tailed Sea Snake (IJydrui^ jihiiiirus:). This is the first record of this species for Tasmania, and it may be of in- terest to qu.ote certain particulars regarding its discover}'. Mr. J. Stanley Hodgson, who kindly forwarded the specimen to the Museum, has (5/o/1919) given me the fol- lowing information: — ''My daughter and self found the '■ snake at Shelly Point, about two miles north of Sca- " mander. He was basking in the sun, laid on a heap of '' seaweed. At first I took him for an eel, and killed him " with the intention of eating him, but on picking him up " I soon found that there was nothing of the eel about " him, and, as nobody seemed to know exactly what he " was, I sent him to you.' The range of this snake is usually given as the Tropi- cal and Sub-Tropical Pacific, and I know of no previo'US re- cord of its occurrence in Tasmanian seas. The present record should, therefore, be of interest. (1) Kef.— Boulanger; Cat. Snakes, Brit. Mus. (1896). Vol. III., p. 26. STUDIES OF TASMANIAN CETACEA. Part IT. (Z I ph iitx r(irir(j and we have pleasure in the present instance in adding to the existing knowledge by describing a skull in the collection of the Tasmanian Museum. (1- 'I'lue. Bulletin 73. US Xiit Mu.-euni. 1010 24 STUDIES OF TASMAMAX CETACEA, This skull was obtained from the Tasmanian Coast. This fact ia of interest, for, although the species under review has on several occasions been recorded fi-om New Zealand, '-' we are aware of no previous record from Australian seas. It is an unfortunate fact that the Tas- manian skull has been stored away for many years with- out any reference being made to it. In the latest work dealing with zoogeography '3) the following reference to thia species occurs. In dealing with the mammals of the North Atlantic : — ■ " Cuviers beaked whale [ZipJiiiix ravirosfrif:), " although but seldom met with, appears to be " of world-wide distribution. It is distinguished " by the two conical teeth at the tip of the lower " jaw. as well as by the circumstance that only " the first three vertebrae of the neck are fused " together." '*' And in dealing with the Indo-Paiific and its shores : — " Cuviers beaked whale {Zi pliiu.^ ruvieri) is also " probably an inhabitant of the Indo-Pacific." '^^^ There can be no doubt that the same species is in- tended, but it is unfortunate that the nomenclature should not agree, even in the same work, for this cetacean. The synonymy is sufficiently involved without such additions as these. Another ]Doint to be noticed is that the anky- losis of the first three cervical vertebrae mentioned by Lydekker is not a constant feature for this species. It probably varies with age. Dr. S. F. Harmer has recently given an account ''^^5' of Z/pIiiuft rar'Tosfr/x from the Irish Coast, and also -stated his intention of publishing a further account, but we are not aware if this has yet appeared. In dealing with the dis- tribution of Zip]iiu>< he states that the best available evi- dence "leads to the concliTsion that Zipli'mx rai'irnsfrii^ is " a cosmopolitan species which inhabits the opei; oceans '■ of the world, and is occasionally stranded." True has recorded (6) where more than three of the cervical vertebrae have been ankj^losed. Except in sucli instances as Hyperorxhin, where all the cervical vertebrae are ankylosed, the fusing of more or less of the cervicals does not appear to be a generic constant. Considerable research has yet to be done in order to (2) For instance, see Trans. N.Z. Institute, Vol. 9. (3) Lydekker. Wild Life of the World. (4) Lydekker, Wild Life of the World, Vol II., p. 246. (5a) Id. Vol. III., p. 327. (5b) Proc. Zoo. Soc. of London, 1915, p. 559. (6) Tnie, Bulletin 73, US, Xnt. Mns.. p. 3.i (1910). BY H. H. SCOTT AND CLIVE E. LORD. gf) exactly establish the exact generic and specific characters of the ziphoid whales in general. It mav be taken for granted, however, that representatives of such genera as ZiphiiiM, N t//trri)(iflointed out. This pub- lished statement of Von Haast s has been copied by other authors, without question, and, therefore, it is nece'sary to correct it, the more so as he cited Prof. Owen as his authoritv, while Owen's writings do not substantiate, and, (7ii) Trins N Z Institute, Vol. ',). ).. i'O. {"b) In connection with the New Ze;il:infl specimen of Ziphiiin rariroslris in the C;inteihuiy Museum, we desire to express our thanki to Mr. K. Spei'4:ht, the Curator of th.it Insiimtion- In order to assist us with the conip irative osteology, Mr Spei;,'ht had severil excellent photographs taken for our benefit These weie of material assistance to us, and we, therefore, have pleasure in placing' on record our appre- ciation o: Mr. Speight's action in this matter. 26 STUDIES Ol'- TASMAMAN CKTACEA, in fact, contradict it I Von Haast says: — "The i^re-fron- '■ tals (of Owen) begin 6.50 inches from the anterior point of " the rostrum." Thi.s is the vomer, and was never called anything else by Prof. Owen. Owen's use of the words ■pre-fronfnJs, as applied to whales, can only be understood by recalling the fact that he restricted the word etlnimid to the nasal sense capsules, and the term pre-frontals to the whole of the ethmoidal elements tliat remained. Now let us look for Owen's j)re-fr<)nfah in the toothed whale. In his description of Oira brerirosfris (cited by Gray) '^'^^ Owen says : — " The roitier extends to within I'h inch of the '" end of the pre-maxillaries. and behind these intervenes " upon the bonv palate between the maxillaries, along a '■ strip of 2 inches and three lines across the broadest part. '■ This palatal part of the vcaiior is the lower convexity of "the canal formed by the spout-shaped bone; the hollow " of the canal is exposed at the upper interspace of the ■ pre-maxillaries. Here also is seen 2 inches Jicliind the " fore end of the vomer the rough, thick anterior border " of the coalesced iire-froniah, which contracts as it passes '■ into their upper border, forming the septum of the nos- " trils, expanding below and behind to form the back " wall of the nasal jDassages. " It will be obviousi that Owen here uses the terms vomer and pre-frontaJa for the bones named by Flower, vomer and ethmoid, and also that while the vomer extends forward almost to the tip of the beak, the eihmoid or pre- frontrils are enclosed by the vomer, which latter is drawn backwards at the base of the skull to cover the spheno- sphenoidal sutui'e. As touching the nasal cavity, the nasal moieties of the vomT extend nearly half-way to the ver- tex, and here coalesce with the cflinioid or pre-fronrnls, whichever we care to call them. True, in his exhaustive monograph on the Ziphiidcc, missing this point, says (Bulletin 73, U.S. Nat. Mus., pp. 50 and 51): — "The proximal end of the roiiirr is anky- " losed with the anterior face of the nasals, and reaches up " to the nasal bosses, etc." This should have been the jjroximal ends of the pre-frontals, ankylose with the an- terior face of the nasals. As a second proof that Owen never co^ifounded the vomer with the pre-frontals, he says at p. 425, of his Anatomy of the Vertebrates, A^ol. 2 : — " The in'e-frontals in tho lielur/a are large, and ascend into view at the back part of the nostrils, where they coalesce with the f rentals." This is the common condition in the order Del pit mid iv, t8;ii Gruy, Biit. Mus., Cat Seals and Whales, p. 285. 15Y H. H. SCOTT AND CLIVE E. Lor.D. 27 and a-9 the pre-frontals at times (as we will deal with in a later paper) coalesce with the nasals, it is wise to call these bones — so marvelloush' reduced in size — yre-franio nasals. In onr skull of Zipli'nis rar/msfris the prc-f rentals do not reach the nasal bosses by an interval of 30 mm. in the medium line, a condition of things always found bridged in dolphins' skulls by cartilage "*''', until late in life, after which ossification takes place. A glance at the Tasmanian skull is enough to show that a cartilaginous bridge existed there also, but was lost by cleaning and bleaching. This note of immaturity in our skull takes us natur- ally to another point, viz.. the non-ossification of the ethmo-vomerine cartilage, which apparently is also de- pendent upon age factors, and not sexual ones. Culling a note from the human subject, we find that the ossifii- centre that gives rise to the ethmo-vomerinc cartilage (as far as it is touched by ossification), the nlsfft f/aHi, and the cribriform plate does not complete its activities luitil half the period of adolescence has been passed. In whales, the sense of smell has atrophied, and the ossific powei-s of the centre named turns its activities upon the ethmo- vomerine cartilage — in the ziphoid whale;i — but appar- ently not till late in life. In most of the Dtl pltiiiitln the cartilage remains as j.uch throughout life, but in very old dolphins it may manifest some ossification at its proximal end. This question of the reduction of the senses in whales is one of the things that warrants considerable attention bc>ing paid to it. if we are to unravel the complexities that surround the group origins of the Cetarfa as a whole. Brietly it may be said in passing that the retention of the nasal organs in whales cuts them off from dolphins, and that the Zi i>hii(hf', to some extent, are midway between them. To bring our specimen into line with the ten ziphoid skulls that True listed, and monographed, we will here quote the description of the specimen that comes nearest to our own, viz., his specimen No. 20971. Thi-s was the skull of a female whale that was captured at Barnegat, New Jersey, U.S.A. Of this True says: — "Adult female. " Majority of sutures open, but those on superior surface " of rostiiim between maxillse and pre-maxilla; jjartly anky- " losed. Vomer nearly all ankylosed to rostral portion of '■ pre-maxillae. It presents a slight median elevation, but " there is na mesirostral nssifiraf/oii. Right pre-maxillfe " in front of nares flat and horizontal ; left, nearly .so, but "with a quite broad longitudinal groove. Opposite maxil- (8b) We have evidence as to the origin of this cartilage, and shall in due course deal with the same. 28 STUDIKS OF TASMANIAN CETACEA, ■■ lary notches, pre-maxillfe nearly on a level with adjacent ' parts. Orifice of anteiior nares level with the lower " end of the nasal boss. End of rostrum qviite acute and " broader than deep. Rudimentary alveolar groove dis- '■ tinct distally Proximal end of vomer (A'/r!) is anky- " losed with anterior face of nasals and reaching up to " nasal boss, which has a sliarp median ridge completing " the nasal sei^tum superiorly. Anterior face of nasal " bos3 slightly concave on each side of the median " line." *y' In our skull the alveolar groove can be traced throughout its length, but everything else is duplicated in Trues description. Apparently this American animal was slightly older at the time it came ashore than our specimen was when captured in Tasmania, for the reason stated, when dealing with the cartilaginous bridge between the pre-frontals and the other elements at the vertex of the skull. In the matter of the ethmo-vomerine cartilage, both skulls yield similar evidence, and in a w^ord True"s data makes it absolutely manifest that the ossification of the rostral cartilage has been pushed to an extreme point, as a factor of taxonomy, since the real truth is that it may or may not ossify, and if it does, it is usually late in life in the female sex — but slightly earlier and more strongly in the male. There is a temi>tation to hazard the guess that the almost total reduction of the dental apparatus in ziphoid whales and the conseqvient diversion of nutriment and nerve energy to a more central line may have had something to do with the extra ossific enei-gy that acted upon the ethmo-vomerine cartilage. At the tip of the beak, upon the right side, there is a foraminal groove, most likely vestigial, and obviously the remaining one of a pair, that at one time were fiinctional. This groove ended about an inch from the functional foramen that passed facial nerves to the beak during the life of the individual under study. The alterations to the beak areas bv the reduction of the tooth line and its alveoli have caused the nerves to traverse the beak superficially and the bony tissue is grooved to receive them. A very slight pressure upon the probe (^^) that was passed into the vestigial canal caused it to carry through and appear in the fossa in front of the functional foramen. These canals are func- tional (and symmetrical) in dolphins' skulls, and appar- ently relate to the teeth. Tn the higher mammals the vomer and its incidental pressure upon part of the septal cartilage determines the amount that ossifies — extra pres- sure causing reduction and suspension of the cfsific activ- (9) Tiaie, Bull. 73, U.S. Nat. Mus., pp. 50-51. (10) This pi-obe wns at the time it appeared externally 17 i inches through the bony tissue of the beak. J!Y II. H. SC(»TT AND CLIVK E. LORD. 29 ity. The skulls of the ziphoid whales arc loosely con- structed, and the ethmo-vomerine cartilage would accord- ingly receive far less pressure than obtains anion? the l)flphini(l(r. This is merely a suggestion in passing, and is not regarded by us as being more than a tentative note. Owing to mutilations in our skull, we are unable to compare the whole of Tme's cranial measurements with our specimen, but a considerable number ax"e hereunder appended, and none of these involved anv restorations. If, by the most careful deductions that can be made by comparative osteology, we restore the mutilated poi"tions of our skull, we find them to fall into line with Tnie s data in a most i-emarkable wav. and evf n a casual glance at the talkie sup])liod will show the similarity of the two speci- mens. Some of the mutilations referred to, as, for instance, the sawing off of the occipital ccndylcs and part of the occiput, evidently prc-dated the gift of the skull to the Muveum, but the loss of the pterygoids, ear bones, and all the teeth suggests unfair rsage in the davs when this and oth?r whales" skulls were left to weather in the back- yard, owing to want of proper storage space. 30 STUDIES OF TASMAXIAN CETACKA, AMERICAN AND TASMANIAN SKULLS OF ZIJ'llIUS CA V/ROSTRIS. Name of the measure- ment made. Totallength Length of the lustium ... Breadth between centie.s of the orbits ... Breadth between zygoma- tic i)roce.s.-es ... Breadth between t('m])or- al fosstc Breadth of rotitiuni at its base Roslnim ill tlie middle (width) Width of pre-niaxilhe at the same point Depth of rostiuin at mid- dle Breaiijpl(jdini. 3. The males, according to True, have — in addition to the ossified rostral cartilage — wide narial basins, and teeth with I'oota 25 to 30 mm. across, as against 10 to 14 mm. for females. 'J. Ziphoid whales have lower jaws longer than the upper, by anything up to 60 mm. — meastired in position. 5. The ptei'ygoids are extremely large and thin, but in oui- skull they are sadly mutilated. NOTES TO STUDENTS. (1) The origin of the Cetacea is not a solved problem, and, in .spite of a. vast amount of writing in this direction, even the group oi'igin still awaits solution. Any infoniia- lion that can be culled from the crania of the existing whales (that relates to the pro-mammalian skull) should be u?eful data, and yeai*s ago Mr. Scott set out to prepare Dolphins' skulls by a long and roundabout process, hav- ing for its object the preservation of cartilaginous and im- perfectly ossified vestiges, that ai-e not commonly pre- 32 STUDIES OF TASMANIAN CETACEA. served in Cetacean skulls as prepared for museum speci- mens. In dealing with the Tasmanian Dolphins such data as we ha,ve collected will be passed in review. (2) In times past the Ziphoid whales must have visited the shores of Tasmania, much as they do to-day, and it is of interest to note that, in this connection, the rniocene strata of Table Oape has yielded an arm bone and some mutilated vertebrae of one of these whales. Althouojh ob- viously nearer to Zip/iiuft than to the genus Memplodon, it does not fit in with either genus, and it may be pos- sible to extract more material from this specimen than that already published in the proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania in 1913. For the present, it is of interest to note that these ancient whales have a place upon our Tasmanian lists that relate to the Natural History of the jDast. LITERATURE REFERRED TO Andrews, Dr. Charles, Monographs, British Museum Series. Beddard, F. E., Dr., Book of Whales. Chapman, F., Some Tertiary Cetacean Remains, Rov. Soc. Victoria, 1917. Flower, Professor, Notes from his lectures in 1883. Hamer, Dr. S. F., On Cuviers Whale. Proc. Zoo. Soc. Lond.. 1915. Haast, Sir J. von, Notes on the Skeleton of E pirhm Xriva-Zealaiulicv. Trans. N.Z. Institute. Vol. 9. Hector, J., On the Whales and Dolphins of New Zealand Seas. Trans. N.Z. Institute. Vol. 5. Owen, Professor, Anatomy of Vertebrates. True, F. W., Monograph of the Ziphoid Whales. Bull. 73. U.S. Nat. Museum. Turner, Sir W., Bones of Cctacea. Challenger Reports Zoology, Vol. 1. -<^ \ *•► ^ I + /+ + «; (^ ^ X 33 NOTES OX THE GEOLOGY OF MARIA ISLAND. By W. H. Clemes, B.A., B.Sc. Plates XL, XII. (Received 2ncl June. 1919. Bead Utli July. 1919.) These notes are intended as an incentive to future study rather than as a complete record of the geology of this interesting locality. They are the result of several holidavs spent on the island, and particularly of two yachting trips undertaken recently. In many places the record is meagre, as I was unable to land and examine the rock formations in detail, but had to rely on obser- vations made while sailing along, often in somewhat troubled waters. Still the description is complete enough to be of value, especially as no previous record has been made, with the exceptoa of the late R. M. Johnston s description of the Fossil ClilTs in his Geology of Tasmania. There is brief mention of a paper read by him before the Royal Society on Ricdlc Bay, but unfor- tunately it was not printed and his valuable observations have been lost. Maria Island is situated on the East Coast, almost opposite to Spring Bay and Orford. The passage between it and the mainland varies in width from three to eight miles. In the narrowest part, off Long Point, is Lachlan Island, a small diabase i'ock covered with sparse vegeta- tion. This passage is the result of excessive wave-erosion acting on the sandstones and diabavse which are now found fringing either shore. There is little doubt that the Orford .sandstones were once continuous with the sand- stones at the Crayfish Rock, a little to the south of the Settlement, and those on the flank of Mt. Maria. The passage itself is extremely shallow with a moderately flat floor, the average depth being about six fathoms. A shoal stretches across from the Sandspits to beyond Lachlan Island, the water on which is in places only one fatliom in depth. The sediment here deposited was lai-gely brought down by the Sandspits River, which has, at the same time, built up a lai-ge alluvial flat and ti-tree swamp covering many acres. The ti-tree is growing on soft oozy mud, Avhicli quiver.s and shakes as one passes over, and it is quite easy to shake a considerable area and make the trees bob and curtsy in a rather alarming fashion. There C 34 NOTES ON THE GEOLOGY OF MAKIA ISLAND, is a fine beach here ending in a long sandj^ hook. In northerly and southerly weather an ugly sea gets up quickly owing to the shallowness of the water. Maria Island is one of those curious "tied-islands" to be found in Tasmania. The reason for their formation has not yet been determined, though it is usual to ascribe it to the sinking of the land, and, though not sufficient data has been collected to dogmatics on the matter, there is no reason to suppose that there have been any other forces in operation. It is interesting to note that at the present time the shore is sinking both in Shoal Bay and also at Orford, on the opposite side of the passage. The same thing is taking place near the mouth of the Huon at Garden Island Creek, and at Kelly's Basin, Port Davey. The isthmus is narrow, low-lying, and sandy, and scarcely raised above sea-level. Shoal Bay is very shallow, though, there is a deep channel off its fjouth-western extremity. At the head of the bay is a beach, the sand of which is largely composed of shell-fragments. Riedle Bay is much deeper, and well scoured by the south-easterly gales. Its beach is composed almost entirely of cpiartz grains trom the granites that fringe its shores. The most prominent feature of the North Island is the great central mass of Mt. Maria and the Bishop and the Clerk, the highest point of which is about 3,000 feet high, and from which the land slopes, in parts precipitously, in parts gently, down to the sea. High hills also cover the South Island, which is smaller and not so elevated. The coast line is most irregular with high cliffs on the north, south, and east, and low-lying rocks to the west, interspersed with fine white beaches. The densest vegetation is to be found on the slopes of Mt. Maria, especially on the east where it intercepts the breezes from the sea. Here the Oyster Bay pine is a prominent feature. The rest of the island is well- wooded with eucalypts and she-oaks, though thinning out on the poorer soils of the granite areas. The geology of the east is quite distinct from that of the west. The rocks on the western half of the island are almost entirely made up of Mesozoic sandstone and dia- base of the usual type, while on the east Penno-Oarbonifer- OU9 mudstones and conglomerates are interspersed with De- voniau granites and older quartzites. The south-western end of the island. Cape Peron, ends in a magnificent pillar and axchway of diabase, from which it runs back to a pyramidal peak above. The diabase continues in a north- easterly direction as a steejily-sloping and precipitous hill-side for about a mile where it junctions with the BY W. H. CLEMES, B.A., B.SC. 35 granite of Barren Head. This forms bold headlands and rocky islands round the coast to Riedlc Baj- and Cape Maurouard. It is generally massive in formation, but varies in places and becomes highly jointed and. in con- sequence, much hollowed by the waves, Sea Elephant or Crayfish Bay being a notable example. As far as I could judge the granite was of the usual type, though some- what coarser grained, in which orthoclase felspar predom- inated, giving it a distinct reddish tinge. Ricdlc Bay is of sui-jDassing interest to the geologist as well as to the arti-t and the lover of beauty in Nature. The granites of Cape Maurouard are succeeded by Permo- Carboniferous marine mudstones. These first appear as a narrow band lying horizontally on the low coastal cliff of granite but rise later to a cliff, beautifully laminated, fully 100 feet in height, extending for about a mile along the shore and resting on a shelf of granite. Later the mudstones disappear, the granite rises up to a cliff about 40 feet in height, on which is resting a narrow lavcr of coarse pebbly conglomerate, of which mention will be made later on. Then the granites give place to earlier quai-tzites, which have been tilted up on edge and other- wise deformed bv the intruding granite. The highly crystalline nature of this rock testifies to the intensity of the metamorphosing action. With the limited time at my dispoi^al I was unable to collect sufficient material to de- termine the age of these rocks, and can only say that they are earlier than the granite. The rocks in the same meri- dional line to the north are given in the Geological Map of Tasmania as Silurian, and there is no reason to suppose that these are of an earlier horizon than that. They form the outer edge of a well-sheltered corner, whose beach continues over the isthmus to the northern side of the bay. Here it is met by an immense heaped-up pile of boulders, mostly of diabase, an eloquent tribute to the force of the southerly gales. The diabase is again succeed- ed by a very coarse-grained granite, on the top of whose wave-worn surface are stranded great diabase boulders, which at first sight appear to have been hurled there by the force of the waves, but later examination leads one to suppose that they are either a talus from the high diabase cap of Mt. Maria behind, or perhaps a small sill or dyke sent from the same source. As we approach Boat Harbour there appears to be another occurrence of the quartzit.es which were found on the opposite side of the bay. Here they are resting on the granites' but tilting steeply southwards. These are succeeded by the gritty basal beds of the Permo-Carboniferous series with its 36 NOTES ON THE GEOLOGY OF MAKIA ISLAND, embedded ice-borne detritus. Above there is a magnificent cliff of conglomerate about 40 feet high consisting of pebbles and boulders set in a matrix of calcareous and felspathic sandstone, which h^s decomposed by the action of percolating water and formed numerous stalactitic growths descending from the overhanging projections. The pebbles are mostly quartzose, ranging in size from the tiniest par- ticles up to large boulders, interspersed with boulders of granite and pieces of slate, schist, and quartzite of the older formations. It is resting in a kind of pocket scooped out in the granite, and is no doubt contemporaneous and homogeneous with the conglomerates^ across the bay. A dyke of diabase comes right thi'ough the middle and a sill of the same material is resting on the top. The granite of Boat Harbour is a very coarse-grained tourmaline granite of handsome appearance. The felspar crystals which pre- dominate are often two to three inches long, and the crystals of the other constituents are correspondingly large. Tliis granite should make a valuable commercial product quite equal to any of the imported article. It is very striking in appearance and should take a splendid polish. It is by far the finest granite I have seen on the East Coast. It extends round Cape dee Tombeaux and passes under the Pei'mo-Carboniferous basal beds which appear in the next little bight, and which are themselves capped bv Cretaceous diabase which forms an overlying spur from jVlt. Maria. Between the next point and Cape Mistaken, usually known as Ragged Head, the granite has suffered a certain amount of deformation, but whether dur- ing consolidation or subsequently is hard to determine. The jointing is most irregular and in places highly con- torted. Around Cape Mistaken, a bold granite headland, we come in sight of a magnificent panorama. The great moamtain-mass of the Bishop and the Clerk here ap- proaches the sea, and slopes precipitously from its summit down to the water's edge. It consists of Permo-Carbonifer- ous limestones and marine mudstones, resting on a bed of granite, and capped by Cretaceous diabase exhibiting columnar structure in the cliffs along its summit, forming the cockscomb-like Bishop and Clerk. Right under the eastern end of the latter mountain the granite gives way to a series of rocks which Dr. Clarke informs me are quartzites. These will probably then be of the same horizon as those of Riedle Bay. They have been highly contorted by the intruding granite; anticlines and synclines are frequent and the plications are most intricate. Where not folded the strata are all standing on edge. Great blocks are also to be seen em- BV W. H. CLKMES, B.A., B.fcC. 37 bedded in the granite, showing conclusively that they belong to an earlier age, but to what age is a matter for future investigation. Permo-Carboniferous limestones are resting unconfonnably above them, and, on the far side, come down below sea-level, the granites having finally disappeared. Thev continue round the coi-ner of Cocks- comb Head and form a huge semi-circle of cliffs extending almost to Cape Boullanger and the He du Nord, which are of diabase. These cliffs are the finc3t example of the Lower IMarine beds that we have in Tasmania. They are regular and almost horizontal, though one or two examples of lenticular deposition are apparent. There are no strik- ing examples of faulting or deformation sUch as appear at Eaglehawk Neck and other localities. The cliffs slope down gradually to the west from a height of about 1,000 feet, Avith flat ledges underneath almost buried in a huge talus of fallen blocks, some of which weigh many tons. These rocks and the cliffs around them are studded with fossils, brought into relief by weathering, and are simply one solid compact mass of shell-remains, among which the Eurydesmas with their thick globose forms predominate. "Blocks of 40 and 50 tons weight seem to be simply made up of a compacted conglomerate of this genus' (R. M. John^iton). The basal beds are the usual grittv iiiuastones more highly studded than usual with ice-borne detritus ; some of the granite blocks embedded in the mud of this old sea-floor must weigh many tons. Their angular nature shows that they have been transported bv ice-action, as that is the only agency which could have carried thom for such a distance and preserved their shape intact. The way in which the surroiuiding mud has been pressed up around their edges aUo proves that thev have been drop- ped from melting floes and sunk to their present resting place. Throe zones are represented : — 1. Eurydesma Zone. 2. Fenestella Zone. 3. Crinoidal Zone. The first two zones have been well described bv the late R. M. Johnston in his Geology of Ta.'-inania and so I need not elaborate on them here. The principal families represented in ihc tir^t zone are Spiriferx, rachi/donnt^, Enrydf-xma , Xotomya, Avicuh/jerfeii, Sfenopora, and Favosites. In the second the Feney-lfUas and Protorcfeporo are interspersed with Spirifrrx, Pnu/iiriiis, Stroplialoi^ia, etc. The Crinoidal Zone is composed almost entirely of a comjiacted mass of 38 NOTES ON THE GEOLOGY OF MARIA. ISLAND. Crinoicl remains. No traces of the flower-like head have been found bvit fossils of the main stem and branching arms are very frequent. It would appear as if these re- mains had collected on some outlying reef where the waves had broken them up into .fragments and destroyed the softer parts. It makes a splendid crystalline limestone, exceeding hard to quarry out, which was at one time worked for lime, but the collapse of the kilns led to its abandonment. The limestones seem to persist along the western base of the mountain, and resting on them is a band of Mesozoic sandstones, and above those the dia- base cap so frequently found in Central and f outh-Eastern Tasmania. Frequently between the limestone and sand- stone is a band of Permo-Carboniferous gritstone. The only other feature of interest is a curious red- dish coloured stone ajDpearing under the diabase near the jetty at Shoal Bay, and at Bloodstone Point on the other side of Long Point. It has the appearance of a highly decomposed granite. If so, it is the most westerly cxposfure on Maria Island. p. & p. Roy. Soc. Tas., 1919. A M^— y/ ^Wi».y /W» Jif£rr/f m/1 Cois CMffr c'rX'. r^A. C/3'3) r-f, .t„'n J/mn -pm MmJ fisjnmj oiart- (i8oz) ^^ jKETCff mn mnmS CMRt /^i^V 39 THE EARLY HISTORY OF MARIA ISLAND, EAST COAST, TASMANIA. By Clive E. Lord. (♦JuiatOT of the Tasmanian Museum). Plato XIII. (Received '2nd June, 1919. Read Utli July, 1919.) Historically speaking, the discoveiy of Tasmania is of recent date, but even so, we lack many details of the early expeditions, and there were probably many early navigators of Australian seas of whom we know nothing. Even in modern days, navigation is not exempt from danger, although all the main routes have been carefully charted, and the advent of steam power has revolutionised the ai't of seamanship. The earlv ex- plorers, however, sailed their small vessels along unknown coasts, and amidst uncharted reefs. How many perished we know not, but even of those expeditions that returned a large percentage of their company were lost bv the way. Scurvy was responsible for a tremendous death roll, in addition to the other dangers of the voyage. It must also be remembered that the discoveries of many of the early explorers were not made known to the world for many voars. Each expedition was working for its own country or company, and in some cases the results of the voyages were carefully guarded for the sake of self interest from a national standpoint. It was not for many years after hirs death that Tasmans work as an explorer became known, and the details of his stay at Tasmania, and incidentally the discoveiy of Maria Island, were given to the world. The exploring ships coming from tlie west — the more settled portions of the old world — nearly all followed on Tasmans tracks. Making their landfall on the rugged coasts of the south-western portion of Tasmania, or, as it wag known of old, as the southern portion of Terra Aus- tralis, and then sailing east U7itil they reached the quieter waters of our east coast. Maria Island will alwavs be connected with the early era of discovery, and the more one visits this locality, the greater the desire becomes to gain some knowledge of its early history. This was so in my own case, and what information I have gathered has been incorporated in the present paper in order that othei's who are interested may have the infoi-mation avail- able should thev desire to take advantage of it. 40 THE EARLY HISTORY OF MARIA ISLAND, As far as European navigators are concerned, Maria Island was first sighted on the evening of December 1st, 1642, when Abel Janszoon Tasman sailed iipi the East Coast and anchored neai' Green Island, to the soiuth of Marion Bay. This anchorage was about fifteen miles to the southward of Maria Island, which Tasmau named. The intrepid Dutch explorer left this anchoiage on December 4th, and his chart shows that he sailed ut> the coast on the ocean side of the island, which he charted as "Maria's Eylanclt. " (i^ For more than one hundred j^ears the aboriginals were undisturbed by visitors from oversieas. On March 5th, 1772, however, the ill-fated Marion du Fresne, fol- lowing on Tasman's charts, anchored his vessels in almosit the same locality as where the TIeemsl-irl: and Zeehan had been a century previously. Marion remained for five or six days', during which time there occurred an unfor- tunate encounter with the natives, in which several of the aboriginals were wounded, and at least one killed. Orozet s narrative of the voyage '-' does not give details of their stay, but it is probable that boats from the ships visited the island. (3) The third European and the first British navigator to sight Maria. Island was Furneaux, but he was in error as regards the iDosition of the island, and probably mis- took the Maria. Island of Tasman for part of "The Schoutens." Captain Cook, in the Fesnlufinn, and Cap- tain Furneaux, in the Adrenfure, became separated in a storm on the 7th of February, 1773. This was Cook'a second voyage to the South Seas, and he sailed to New Zealand, while Furneaux called in at Adventure Bay before rejoining his captain. On the 9th of March, Furneaux sighted Tasmania, or, as it was then called, the south coast of New Holland. He mistook the , points, and- took the entrance to the present D'Entre- casteaux Channel to be Storm Bay. When he first anchored on the 10th of March, he thought he was near the Frederick Henry Bay of Tasman, and it is this error which led to such subsequent confusion. Furneaux called the bay Adventure Bay, after his ship, and considered Tasman's Frederick Henry Bay to be a few miles north. The present Tasman's PeninsTila was called bv Furneaux (1\ Tasman, Abel Janszoon. —Journal of a Yoyai;e in 1642 Amster- dam 1898, Maria Island was named after the wife of Anthony Van Diemen, the Governor of Batavia, and not after his dau!:rhter, as is often stated. [1] Crozet's Voyage to Tasm.inia, New Zealand, etc., 1771-72 Trans, by Ling Roth. Lond. 1891. (3) See Copies of Marion's Charts. P. and P. Eoy. Soc. Tas. 1889. BY CLIVE E. LOUD. 41 the Maria Island of Tasman. His description of the anchorage in Adventm'e Bay is as follows: — "At seven o'clock in the evening we anchored in "seven fathoms of water, with the small bower, and "moored with the coasting anchor to the westward, "the North point of the Bay N.N.E. h E. (which we "take to be Tasman".? Head), and the Easternmost "point (which we named Penguin Island, from a "curious one caught there (^) ) N.E. by E. ^ E. ; the "watering place W. h N. ; about one mile from shore "on each side; Marias Island, which is about five or "six leagues off, shut in with both points; so that you "are quite landlocked in a most spacious harbour." Furneaux stayed five days in Adventure Bay, and having completed taking in wood, water, and grass, he set sail. He records passing "Marias Islands" on the 16th, and the Schoutens Islands on the 17th, and after pro- ceeding further north he stood away to New Zealand. ^^) Furncauxs mistakes led to considerable confusion, and even at the present time the result of his investigations may be seen in the misleading nomenclature, which is still in general use. Captain Cook, during his third voyage in 1777, an- chored in Adventure Bay in January of that year. He failed to notice Furneauxs error, as he records bearing."? from his anchorage in Adventure Bay to the points of "Maria 9 Island.'" The first detailed examination of the island was made by Captain John Heniy Cox, during a voyage in the brig Mtrriirij, in 1789 '^'. On the 3rd of July he sighted the coast of Tasmania, and at one p.m. was abeam of S.W. Cape (^\ At six in the evening the brig was brought to anchor in a deep bay (^), the ilewstone bearing S. by E. A little water was obtained, and signs of the natives were seen. A heavy sea set into the bay on the m.oming of 5th July, and some difficultv was experienced in weighing the anchor, owing to an accident to tho winch, which injured several of the crew. The (4) "Probably the first record of Kud ijtiilc.^ clirii. O^* In 1792 Admiral Bruny D'Entrecast^aux, in com- mand of the Rerherclie and Ksperaiirt, anchored in the channel which he then discovex'ed, and which now bears his name. He returned again in the following year, and while anchored near the centre of the Channel, on Feb- ruary 16th he sent Beaupre, the "engineer geographer, ' to explore the estuary of the present River Derwcnt, and also the shore to the Eastward. He was particularlv instructed to discover "whether the island of Maria was "really separated from the land of New Holland ; for "this had not been sufficiently resolved bv Marion, or "even by Captain Cook." On tlie return of the boats, Beaupre stated that he had seen the channel which sep- arates the island of Maria from the mainland. His charts clearly show the track of the boats and his "Chan- "nel" would be the low lying land connecting Forcstier's Peninsula, for it must be remembered that Furneaux's error was now bearing fruit, and that the Peninsula was being mistaken for the Maria Island of Tasman. (^'') When Sir John Hayes visited Tasmania in 1793, in the Duke of Chircnce and the Diirhess, he did not explore the East Coast, his main surveys being in the Channel and (11) Pelican. (12) From an examination of the chart and the woidins of this passage it would appear that the Mercury sailed up the eastern coast of the island and entered the strait between the island and the main- land at its northej-n end. (13) Mortimer, Lieut. G.— Voyage in Brig Mercury, commanded by John Henry Cox. (14) Labillardiere. — Voyage in search of La Perouse. 44 THE EARLY HISTORY OF MARIA ISLAND, the Derwent. He probably only saw Maria Island at the time of his departure for New Guinea. (15) <16). Ba?s ?.nd Flinders, in the Norfolk, i^'^) during the historic voyage in which they conclusively proved the existence of Bass Straits, were the next to sight the island. After leaving Stonn Bay on Januai-y 3rd, 1799, they opened up Cape Raoul and Cape Pillar. Flinders states that "These two' high columnar Capes are the extreme "points of the land which Captain Furneaux took to be "Maria's Island." (^8) After rounding Tasman's Island, the true Maria Is- land was sighted at 5 p'.m., and they hauled in close to the shore, but the squally wind drove them off. The next morning the island appeared as if divided in two. ^^^) At ten o'clock the wind veered round, and they ta^cked towards the island, but as the day wore on the wind increased, and as it was impossible to get near Maria Island before dark, they bore away to the northward. The next explorer tO' visit Tasmania was the French Admiral, Baudin, in command of the (Tcographe and NaturaJiste. After investigating the Channel, they sent out a boat expedition towards the East, in order to discover if they could sail the ships through the strait between Furneauxs "Maria Island " and the mainland. M. Faure, the "engineer geographer" of the expedition, spent eleven days exploring and charting the coasts. He noted the misplacement of Frederick Henry Bay, and that, the "Maria Island" of Furneaux, or the "Isle d'Able Tasman" of D'Entrecasteaux was a peninsula. On the 17th of February the ships sailed out of the Channel, and about five in the evening of the 18th, a.nchoired in the strait between the mainland and Maria Island. At daybreak next morning the long boat was sent with orders to circumnavigate Maria Island, to make a chart of its coast, and to ascertain if there wag any fi'&sh (15) Lee —Commodore Sir John Haye?. (16) The following passage re Risdon from Mrs. Lee's book is worth repeating: — "It has often been stated in print that the name ■originated in Eestdown as beine the place wliere the first British "settlers under Lieutenant Bowen, R.N,, rested after their stormy "voyage in 1803. a legend which has come to be regarded as the "truth. Risdon, however, was the second officer of the Duke of Clar- ' cnce." (17) The Norfolk was a small boat of 25 tons, built at Norfollv Island in 17S8. She was built and eauipped by the settlers in order to provide communication with Sydney. When the boat arrived at Port Jackson, however. Governor Hunter commandeered her for use by Bass and Flinders. In 1808 the majority of the Norfolk isbinders were re- moved to Tasmania, hence the names New Norfolk, Norfolk Plains, etc. (18) Flinders. — Voyage Terra Australis. Intro, p. cxc. (19) A vprv low and narrow sandy neck connects the northern and southern portions of the island. BY CLIVE E. LORD. 45 water. The boat, which was under the command of M. Maui'ouard, included in its complement, M. Boullanger, geographic engineer, and M. Peron, the naturalist and historian. Skirting along the southern coast, the ex- tremity was named Cape Peron, and the granite outcrop ahead of this the Pyramid. Progressing up the east coast, they charted the point at the southern end of the large bay Cape Maurouard, after the cadet in charge of the boat, who also assisted M. Boullanger in his geographic studies. Tlie bay itself was named Riedle, in honour of a naturalist of the expedition, who had died at Timor. The explorers landed at Riedle Bay about two o clock, and it was here that Peron found the famous example of the aboriginal tomb. This was a structure of bark, cover- ing the remains of an aboriginal whose bodv had been cremated. On the 20th the boat continued its journey, parsing the Cape Mistaken of Cox, and rounding the northern cape, which was named Boullanger, after the hvdrographcr of the expedition. The small island off the north ex- tremity of Maa-ia Island they named Islet du Nord. Along this part of the coast the growth of kelp greatly astonished the explorers, and considerably hampered their progress. On the western side the explorers gaye the name Point Lcseur (20) to the point at the head of Oyster Bay, and Middle Island ('-i' to the island half way between this point and the mainland. As it was growing dark, the explorers ])roceeded to land, but at the sight of about thirty aboriginals, thev proceeded further into the bay, and landed without being approached. The next day they surveyed Oyster Bay, and w-ere just leaving when the sound of guns from the ship announced the fact that M. Mauge, the surgeon, was dead. (22) Tlie boat returned to the ships on the evening of the 21st. During the following days parties from the ship visit-cd the island, and several interviews with the natives were held. Peron docs not seem to have been impressed with the Maria Island tribe. During the time that the exploration of the island wa.«; in progress, several other (20) Now Lons Point. (21) Now McLauiihlan's or Lachlan Island. ,. '22j. "The last of my colleagues. M. Mauge. was certainly no more. and his remains had at that moment been committed to the earth ^_He died the day after we left the ship, universally re:rretted by all on board both vessels. . . . His body was interred on Isle ^Maria at the foot of a large Eucalyptus, against which a plate of lead _was hxed, whereon was inscribed the sad particulars of his death. and the name of Point Mauge was given to the part of the island where the remains of our unfortunate companion are deposited " Peron. 46 THE EARLY HISTORY OF MARIA ISLAND, parties had been sent out surveying. The first, under the command of M. Freycineit, Senior, surveyed the coast south of Cape Bernier, which they named. This expedi- tion was absent eight days, and they showed that Fred- erick Henry Bay was actually situated as shown by Tasman, and that Marion Bay was only a long open bay on the ocean side of the true Frederick Henry Bay, ('^^) the two bays being separated by a long sandy isthmus, the only connection by water being a narrow opening at the south corner. They found that there was no appearance of the Channel shown on the charts of DEntrecasteaux. Flinders' charts were more correct in sliowing Tasman's Peninsula, but his location of Frederick Henry Bay was incorrect. The northern peninsula was named Forestier's Peninsula. The second boat expedition, under the command of M. Freycinet, Junior, was absent three days, and ex- plored the East Coast, from Cape Bernier to Fleurieu Bay. This bay wasi so named (2^) by the third expedition, which explored the Schoiitens. They found that instead of the five or six islands which had previously been shown on the chart, there was only one, and that what had previously been taken for islands were the high hills of the peninsula, which are separated in several cases by low, sandy necks of land. The peninsula was called Freycinet's Peninsula. The French devoted some time to the study of the natural history of Maria Island. They particularly re- mark upon the immense beds of kelp' fringing the shores, the great shoalsi of dolphinsi and whales, and the "in- "numerable legions" of seals. Baudin sailed from his anchorage on the 27th of Febniary. Owing to the unfavourable weather, their progress up the coast was slow, and the ships became separated from one of the ship's boats, which had been sent out exploring near Thouin, or Wineglass Bay. (25) On the 10th of March when bearing towards the straits a isanall ship was sighted which was on the way to Maria Island to catch seals. This vessel may well be regarded as one of the first of the moderns. The old era of exploration (23) Unfortunately the true Fredrik Henry Bay of Tasman :s now known as Blackman's Bay. (24) "In honour of the illustrious scholar to -whom France and "her navy are so much indebted for so many valuable and honourable "works." Peron. (25) This boat later met the British vessel, Harrinoton, Captain Campbell, who supplied them with provisions. They fell in with the Naturaliste in Bass Straits, and later rejoined the Gcooraphe in Syd- ney- The Geographc also met an English Brig on the 8tli March. She was named the Endeavour, havins been built at Port Jackson. Her hull was "of the wood of the Casuarina and her masts of the Euculyp- "tus." BV CLIVE K. LORD. 47 from a geographical standpoint was past and Commerce was following quickly upon the heels of Discovery. From now onwai'd the island was continually visited by sealing and other vessels, both from the mainland and from the settlement at the Derwent. <-6) In the early year's of the colony's history Maria Island was mainlv used lay those engaged in the whaling and seal- ing industry, and several localities are now pointed out which in the early days were the resort of "bay whalers." In 1S25, however, a new era began. The Government considered that the island would make an excellent con- vict station, as not only was it a "natural penitentiary" but appeared to be a suitable locality in which to grow flax. Particular attention was being paid to the cultiva- tion of that plant at this time. Accordingly on the 4th of March, 1825, the first vessel sailed from Hobart with a draft of prisoners. The first Commandant was Lieutenant Peter Murdoch of the 35th Regiment, and he held office until the 26th of August, when he was succeeded by T. D. Lord, who had charge of the station for some years follow- ing. Among the early officers at the settlement may be mentioned Assistant-Surgeon J. Griffith. Storekeeper T. J. Lcmpinere, and Principal Overseer R. Dodsworth. The guard was composed of men of the 40th Regiment. The island, however, did not come up to expectations as far as being a natural penitentiary was concerned, for there were numerous escapes. In one inst.ance six men vacated the island by means of a rough raft of bark, et<;. The settlement, which had been named Darlington (^) was, however, extended, and several out stations were created. In 1830 a woollen factory was erected for the manufacture of rough cloth. Two years later the cloth was one of the main productions of the station, which, it was considered, was about self-supporting. The cloth pro- duction was valued at 8s. per yard, and as on an average 100 yards were woven weekly the value, per annum, was about £2.000. In addition 4,000 pairs of shoes were made each year, which at 5s. per pair added another thousand pounds to the revenue. However, the authorities did not seem satisfied with the station, and soon after the founda- tion of Port Arthur (28) the settlement at Maria Island was vacated. (2*5* (26) First settlement at the Derwent— September 7th, 1803. (27) Mr. H. Wrin-ht. Librarian of the Mitchell Library, Sydney, to whom I am indebted for certain information in this paper, considers that Darlington was probably named after Governor Darling. (28) The Port Arthur Settlement was founded in 1831. (20) Maria Island was vacated as a penal establishment, for the first time, in 1832. 48 THE EARLY HISTORY OF MARTA ISLAND, In 1841 Lord Stanley's Probation System came into force and the station was again occupied under the new scheme for dealing with the convict population. The stttlement was extended, and in 1845 there were about six hundred prisoners on the island, these being divided into four classes. The main buildings' at Dai'lington, in which the convicts were housed, consisted of six large rooms con- taining 66 men each, 20 huts of various sizes, capable of holding from 3 to 24 men each and about 100 senarate apartments '30) The position at the settlement at this time does not appear toi have been at all satisfactory. (3i) Among the people exiled to the isle were several of the Maori chiefs who had been concerned in the New Zea- land rebellion. At a later date some were allowed to re- turn to their native land, but one at least died on the is- land, for in the neglected cem.etery of the old station may be seen a stone stating that — Here lie the remains of HOHEPA TE UMUROA a native of Wanganui, New Zealand, who died July 9th, 1847. There are several other interesting epitaphs in this old graveyard, which is situated on the north-western point of the island. The spot is unfortunately much neglected and many of the graves are overgrown with boobialla. At the present rate of progress it will not be many years, before all trace is lost, except perhaps for a few of the larger tomb- stones, of the records of those who died and were buried at the settlement of Darlington in the early days of its his- torv. " On October 29th, 1849, the brig Swift, 360 tons, G guns, commanded by Captain Aldham, arrived at Hobart from London. She had on board several of the Irish State prisoners. Among the number was Smith O'Brien, and as he refused to accept a ticket-of-leave, G-overnor Denison, who had visited Darlington in January (32)^ decided to send him to Maria Island. Here O'Brien apparently tried every means of making a martyr of himself, and his friends devised a plan for his escape. A priest communicated the details to O'Brien (^•^), and he was ready when the schooner Victoria anchored oflf the coast and sent a boat ashore. Be- fore O'Brien could reach tJie boat, however, a constable appeared and an-ested the boat's crew at the point of his (30) Boyd to Hampton, 31st Dec, 1845. (31) Syme.— Nine Years in V.D.L., p. 270. (32) Denison. — Varieties of Vice-Resal Life, p. 104. (33) Denison. — Varieties of Vice-Eesal Life, p. 144. CV (LIVE !■:. LOUD. 49 musket. O'Brien was so furious at the failure of the plan that he refused to walk back to the station, and had to be cai-ried there by the men who had come to rescue him (•^>. After this O'Brien '35» was transferred to Port Arthur, and eventually he accepted a ticket-of-leave. Transportation was soon to cease, however, and Dar- lington was finally vacated as a convict station in 1850. There is an amusing account (^^' of how the H.M.S. IlavduiKili, unaware that the settlement had been vacatoj, put in there at Christmas time, 1850. and awaited a wel- come due to such a Queen's ship. However, "the tall flag- '"staff was buntins'less, the windmill sailless, the prettv cot- "tages and gardens seemed tenantless, not a drum wa* ■heard in the military barracks, and the huge convict "buildings seemed minus convicts. At length, through a "telescope, was observed one canary coloured biped, in the ■grey and yellow livery of the doublv and treblv convicted 'felon. Presently a whaleboat came slowly off and 'there appeared on the quarter-deck a hawk-eyed and "nosed personage about six feet and a half high, who seeni- 'ed as if he had long lived in indifferent society, for his "eyes had a habit of sweeping round his person as though "he was in momentary danger of assault. This was an '■overseer left in charge of the abandoned station with a "few prisoners to ass-ist him." This now brings us to the end of the earlv period of the islands interesting history and the one with which we will conclude. We have seem how the early romantic era of geographical exploration gave place to commerce as re- presented by the scalers and "bav whalers.' And how when these men had exterminated their stock in trade the island became a home for th^ reformers of societv — and their patients. During the centuiy the island was to wit- ness yet another commercial era due to the activities of Signer Bernacchis Maria Island Company, but this is be- yond the scope of our present investigation-. ^laria Island will always be of interest, not onlv from a scientific stand- ])oint owing to its peculiar geological formation, but from the more general fact of it.s charming scenerv and ideal climate. Closely interwoven with the other attractions of the island ai-e the interesting facts relating to its earlv his- '34) Deni«on-— Varieties of Vice-Kegal Life, p 143. • 35) Some said O'Brien was betrayed. However, the Viciorin Tas L-aptured by a heat from the settlement, and the master Ellis was tried at Hobart, and his share of the vessel forfeited. In spite of this he managed to get away with the vessel Later, some of the Irish prisoners who had reached America met Ellis at San Francisco, and an immediate Lynch law trial took place. The "jury." however, ac- quitted EUis on the chanre of betraying the plan of escape. Fenton, Hi'^tory of Tasmania, p. 216. <36) Mundy.— Our Antipodes, p. 474. D &0 THE EARLY HISTOEY UF MARIA ISLAND, tory. I have been privileged to recall a few of these in the foregoing pages, but there are doubtless many more even moie interesting ones which I am not aware of but which will I hope be placed on record by those in possession of them before the records relating to them are forgotten. Sufficient has been written, I think, in order to show what interesting periods of historj^ this island has seen. NOTES ON TPIE NOMENCLATUKE. Oape Boullanger. Thi'o was named after a. member of Baudins expedition, as shown by the following passage : "En cffet a peine on a double le cap Nord, qui, du ''nom dc notre ingcnieur, rte appele Cap Boullanger. "... En evant du cap Boullanger, se presente "un grosse roche, qui se rattache a File Maria par une "traint^e de recifs dangereux ; cette roche est precede "dun gros ilot granitique, pen eleve, sterile, et qui "laisse entre la terre et lui un passage practicable "seulement pour le petites embarcations. Nous "rappelames Ihd dii Xord.'' On Baudin's Charts (Carte d'une parte de la Cote orientale de la Terre de Diemen dresse par L. Freycinet d'apres ses observations et celles de MM. Faure et Boul- langer. Fevrier 1802). Cap Boullanger is unmistakably shown as the northern point of Maria Island, thus bearing out the description in the text. On Flinders' Chart (South Coast, sheet 6), "C. Boullanger or Coxcomb Head " appears east of its true location. The present maps issued by the Lands Department show Cape Boullanger as the point near the Bishop and Clerk. This is by nO' means its cor- rect position, and it should be transferred back to its orig- inal placD — the extreme north point of Maria Island, op- posite the I. du Nord (3'^). The point where it appears on the present day maps is generally known as ''The Bishop^ and Clerk" after the prominent mountain of that nam-e which projects boldly seawards at this point. This is the "cock's-comb-like"" head referred to by Flinders. By some strange alteration "Coxcomb's Head," which appears upon Flinders' Charts of 1798-9 (published 1814) as a 'Sjynonym of Cape Boullanger, now appears on the Lands Departments Charts as a synonym of Cape Mis- taken. But even this latter Cape has been misplaced, as I shall show later. Cape Mistaken. So named by Captain John Henry Cox of the Brig Mercury in 1789. The name on modern (37) The 1. du Nord is variously called locally "North Id.," "Green Id.," "Rabbit Id.," or "Goat Id." nV CLIVK !•:. LOUD. 51 map? appears too far to the south. Peron refers to this Cape as follows : — "Aj^res avoir double- la point Xord de la baio ■Riedle, nous vimes la terre courir a I'J^.X.E. jusque ■par le travers du cap Mixtalni (ainsi nomnie par le "Capitaine Cox, qui reconnut 0)/< liny en 1789), "qui forme le point le plus oriental de 1 ile."' Upon the present day maps of the Lands Department the most eastern point of the northern portion of Maria Island is designated Ragged Head. The same name is given to a point a mile or so Xorth-West. A few miles to the south of this there is a point marked Cape Mistaken or Cocks-combs Head. (On Flinders" Charts Coxcomb's Head appears as a synonym for Ca))c Boullanger.) There (an be no doubt, after an examination of Cox's and the other early charts, that the name Cape Mistaken was given by ('ox to the most eastern point of the island, and that the present position assigned to it on the Lands De- partment s maps i". incorrect. It must further be remem- bered that it was after rounding this Cape when Cox dis- covered he was not working into Adventure Bav that lie gave the name Cape Mistaken to this point. Flinders gives <^S' details of his observations when coasting along the shores of IMaria Id. as' follow : — "At daylight, Maria's Island appeared to be divided "into two, Schouten s Island was visible, and the prin- "cipal bearings taken were as follow : "Tasnians .mall island <39> S. '240 W. "A deep bight in the coast S. 56 W. "South Head of Fredeiik Hendrik's Bay. 8. 72 \V. "Maria's Island, south part N. 04° to 43 "\V. " , north part X. 39 to 19 W. "Schouten's Island Xorth to N. 5 E. "The wind shifted to north at ten o'clock, and we "tacked towards ^Maria's Island. At noon the north - "east extreme, a cock's-comb-like head was distant four "or five miles, but the island lying off it in Mr. Cox's "chart was not visible nor yet the isthmus which con- "nects the two parts of the island. "Observed latitude 42° All" S. "South Head of Frederik Hendrik's Bay... S. 40 W. "Marias Island, south part Clouded. " , north part S. 82° to X. 64 W. "Schouten's Island, dist. 4 leagues. X'. 3 W. to 8 E. I'i^) Flinders. — Voyage to 'I'eiia Australis. Intro, p. cxc. (39) It must be remembered that until Flinders examined the French and later chart«. alter his imprisonnient ut Mauritius, he con- aidered Tusman's Peninsula was an island. 52 THE EAKLY HISTORY OF MARIA ISLAND, "We had squally weather in the afternoon, with wind "at north-west; and being unable to get near Maria's "Island before the evening, bore away northward, hav- "ing a fresh breeze at W.S.W." I have plotted Flinders' position and taken into con- sideration his remark : "At noon the north-east extreme, a "cock's-comb-like head was distant four or five miles," and I do not think that theire is the slightest doubt that the headland referred to by Flinders is the prominent projec- tion formed where the Bishop and Clerk mountain abrupt- ly falls to the sea. My personal recollections of the east- ern aspect of tlie Coast strengthen this opinion. If any further evidence was desired one has to examine Flinders' own charts. On these Ca,pe Boullanger has been moved from the low Iving northern point to the massive buttress of the noTth-eastern promontory, and is marked "C. Boul- langer or Coxcomb's Head." Cape Maurouard. Named after a member of Baudin's expedition. "Parvenus a la pointe de 'Est, cjue nous nominee "Cdji Maurouard, du nom de I'aspirant recommand- "able qui partageoit alors avec M. Boullanger le soin "des travaux gcographiques, nou.ii vimes la cote se "diriger au N.N.O. ' On Baudin's charts (Freycinet's) the location of this Cape is clearly shown as the most eastern point of the southern portion of Maria Island. Flinders also gives it this position. On the Tasmanian Land Department's pre- sent maps the name is given to the northern point of Cray- fish Bay, while the most eastern point of the southern sec- tion of the island is designated Cape Bald. Cape Peron. Named after the naturalist and histor- ian of Baudin's expedition. "Bientot nous atteignimes le cap le jolus Sud de "cette lie, que nos geographes ont nomme Caj^ Pernn. "En evant de cette cap, s' eleve un rocher granitique "solitaire de 150 a 200 pieds de hauteur, dechire par "les fiots, imitant assez bien, souis ce rapport, un sorte "d'obelisque : il fut nomme la Pyramide.'' W Long Point. This is the "Leseur Point" of the French explorers. The designation Long Point first ap- pears on the chart of 1837. Leseur was one of the French artist?. Maria Island. So named by Tasman in 1642, in hon- our of the wife of Anthony Van Diemen (and not after his daughter as is often stated). (40) Voj'age de Decouveites aux Terres Australes. Vol. 1., p. 263. BY CLIVK E. LORD. 53 Mauge Point. Named after the surgeon of Baudin's expedition, who was buried on Maria Island at this place. Care must l:e taken to discriminate between Point Maugc on Maria Island and Monge Bay (now generally spoken of a? Pirates Bay) on the cuter side of Eaglchawk Neck. Monge Bay was also named by Baudin. but was so called after a French scientist. <*^' Oyster B.\y. Named by Captain Cox in 1789, who brought the brig Mn-ntrn to anchor there in order to take in supplies of wood and water, On picscnt dav mans the name Oyster Bav is reserved for the Outer Bay and the inner portion designated Shoal Bay Soften referred to local- ly as Chinaman 3 Bav). RiEDLE Bay. So named by Baudin's expedition in 1802. It was named after one of the naturalists of the expedition, who had died at Timor in 1801. LITERATURE CITED. Backhouse. J. — Narrative of a visit to the Australian Colonies. Lond. 1843. Bent, A.— -Almanacks" from 1824 to 1829. Bligh, Lieut. W. — A Vovage to the South Sea. Lond. 1&92. Bunce, D. — Australa^iatic Wanderings in Tasmania, and Australia. Cook, Capt. J. — Voyage toward the South Pole and round the world performed in H.M.S. litxalulinn and Ad- nntitrr 1772-75. Lond. 1777. Cook, Capt. J. — Voyage to Pacific Ocean, etc., under the direction cf Captains Cook, Clerk A* Gore, in H.M.S. Ri-.^(,l itfion and Di^rmerii in 1776-80. London 1784. Crozet. — (Marion'ci Vovage). Crozct's Vovage to Tasmania, etc.. in 1771-lt72. Translated bv H. Ling Roth. Lond. 1891. Denison, Sir William. — Varieties of Vice-Regal Life. Lond. 1870. Feiitoii, .) . — History of Tasmania. Hobart 1884. Flinders, M. — Vovas;e to Terra Australis, etc., in the years lSOl-3. Lond. 1814. Labillardiere. — Vovage in Search of La Porousc 1791-94. Lond. 1800." Lee, Ida. — Commodore Sir John Haves. His Vovage and Life. Lond. 1912. (41) Voyajre i aux 'J'eire> .\^I^tr;lle*. Vol. 1, 54 THE EARLY HISTOIIY OF MARIA ISLAM). Mortimer, Lieut. G. — Voyage in Brig Mercury. Com- manded by John Henrj^ Cox. Lond. 1791. ■\Jundy, Lt.-Col. G. C— Our Antipodes. Lond. 1852. Peron et Freycinet. — (Baudin's Voyage) — Voyage de Decouvertes aux Terres Au^trales. Paris 1809-16. JaOss, J. — Hobart Town Almanack. Annually from 1829- 1836. Eoval Society of Tasmania. — Papers and Proceedings 1849. ->^ Syme, J. — Nine years in A"an Diemen's Land. Dundee 1818. Tasman, Abel Janszoon. — Journal of Voyage in 1642. Amsterdam 1898. Tasmanian Field Xaturalists' Club. — Easter Camp Ee- porti. Camps at Maria Id. 1908, 1912 and 1915. [Since the above paper was read before the Society, the oflTicials of the Lands Department have taken a kindly interest in the Cjuestion of the nomenclature, and I am glad to note that there is every prospect of the names being restored to their original positions. — C.E.L.] p. & p. Roy. Soc. Tas., 1919 NEW SPECIES OF TASMANIAN MOLLUSOA, WITH CRITICAL REMARKS ON SEVERAL DE- SCRIBED SPECIES, AND ADDITIONS TO THE LIST. By W. L. :May. (Received 20th June. 1919. Read lltli Augu.st, 1919.) Plates XIV. -XVII. The species heie described include no startling novel- tics, but are more or less closely related to previously known forms. They have come from various parts of our coasts, and frcm lew water mai'k down to one hundred fathoms, and may be described as the balance from several years collecting left after moic striking species have been dealt with. The tvpes of the new species will be presented to the Tasmanian !Mu.seuni. June. 1919. C.VLI-OC HITnX ELDNGATr?, sp. UOV. Shell very small, narrowly elongate, girdle rather broad; rather elevated; the valves distinctly beaked. Coloui- — Purplish-brown, lighter on the doi-sal area, giving the appearance of a longitudinal pale band. A co-type has the 6th and 7th valves mostly pale green and the 2nd valve with a large whitish blotch dorsallv. Anterior valve ?.emi-circular, slightly beaked, covered with minute pustules ; median valves with lateral areas distinctly raised, the pleural and dorsal areas are not separated, except that the low pustules that cover the whcle valve become finer and more longitudinal towards th« ridge. Tail valve with mucro about one-fourth from the adjoining valve differentiated from the re.st of the valve by a small ridge and very slightlv elevated. Girdle covered with imbricating, elong.\ted. sharp-pointed .scales, and similarly coloured to the vaK es, but of a lighter shade, sometimes with ])aler blotches. Length 7.^ ; breadth, 3.6 mill. Habitat. Norfolk Bay and Port Arthur (E. Mawle). Seven or eight specimens collected. This beautiful little species is a very much smaller and iinrrnircr shell than ('. jihifexsn, Grould ; (' . nific, Ashby, the type of which I have f-een, is broader still. The present sjoecies has for its size coarser sculpture than ji/afe-^sa. It varies much in colour- 5(3 ISEW SPECIES OF TASMANIA^ MOLLUSCA, ETC. ing, but the ground colour seems alwaj'S to be some shade of purplish-brown. It may be blotched with green and whitish in various degrees of pattern. PI. XIV., figs, la, lb. Ap.-VTURPaS COSTIFERA, Sp. UCV. Shell small, fusiform, white with a broad chestnut band on the centre of the body-whcrl. Whorls 5^ rounded, the first two being quite smooth, the rest sculptured with strong, rounded axial ribs, fourteen en the penultimate, sixteen on the body whorl, they fade away a little below the periphery. The base being encircled b}^ numerous fairly strong spiral lirx ; the ribs are crossed by wexj fine, sharp spiral threads. Aperture fairly large, pointed above, broad at the base, where it scarcely becomes a canal ; columella ex:cavate, bearing two low tubercles, outer lip rounded and simple. Length, 4.5; breadth, 2 mill. Habitat. Tvue, with live others from about 40 fathom;-: East of Tliouin Bay. This specici? closely resenibles Jl/frn/i/orj/lui a iirostafrr Verco. It is, however, a narrower shell, with more rounded whorls, and the spiral lirae are much less strong ; it has, too, a more bluntly rounded apex. PI. XIV., fig. 2. Xepotilla diaphana, sp. nov. Shell i'mall, thin, of a semi-transparent texture, colour 3'ellcwi=h-brown, pinkish towards the apex, broadly fusi- form, whorls five, including a prominent two-whorled proto- conch, which is strongly spirally lirate; the adult whorls much rounded, and strongly cancellate. There is a hollowed space below the suture, corresponding with a shallow sinus, and ornament.ecl by curved growth lines ; strong axial ribs cross the whorls and are separated by spaces of about their own width ; they number about twenty on the body whorl and fade away below the periphery; they are crossed on the spire by three spirals, less strong than the ribiii and about equally spaced, so that square meshes are formed, producing small nodules at the junction. These spirals continue on the base, where they are smaller and closer together. Apeiture broad, with a verv short open canal, columella excavate, with a narrow callous lip, outer lip rounded, corrugated by the sculpture, with a broad rather shallow sinus at the suture. Lcnsth 4.4; breadth, 2 mill. p. & p. Roy. Soc. Tas., 1919. 1!Y W. I.. MAY. 5( Habitat. The type, with five others from Frederick Henrv Bay, two others from Thouin Bay, East Ooast. All the specimens have been taken from the roots of the giant kelp and have much the appearance of young shells. It resembles X. /rf/raiif/i, Beddonie, more than any other, but is entirely distinct from that species, which is much more strongly sculptitred, and has many move spirals. PI. XIV., fi^. 3. POLINICES CATENOIDES, SJO. UOV. Shell of moderate size, rotund, with a small but sharp spire; umbilicate. Whorls nve, rapidly increasing, the last very large, rounded, with a slight depression below the suture. Aperture roundly lunate, rather produced in front, lip thin. Columella a little coiuave, with a callus partlv covering the umbilicus, and developing into a pad where it joins the lip above ; the calluii has a distinct groove crossing it, at the upper edge of the umbilicus, which latter is of moderate size, deep and perspective. Tha colour appears to be yellowish-brown, pahr below the suture, and on the base, and there are indications of chest- nut flames crossing the sutural band, and patches of the same colour on the bodv whorl. Diameter and height, each lo mm. Typo with 10 othcr<, mostly small, froji about 60 fathoms South of Port Arthur and one from 100 fathoms East of Cape Pillar. This species is reniarkaVjly like /'. mtriin, da Costa, from Northern Europe, sc much ^o, that it is at first diffi- cult to se3 anv diftcrcnces. However, the umbilicus is rather smaller, and the front of the columella more pro- duced ; it is rather broader, has a depression below the suture, a furrow on the columella, and probably the (flour is different. Compared with /'. nitfttn/i/hisya, Pils. and Van., it is a mucn rounder shell, and lacks the heavy pad over the umbilicu?, besides bting rniich smaller. I have known this species for a considerable time, but hesi- tated to describe it, hoping for better examples ; such, however, have not yet ccme to hand. All my specimens are "dead, and most have lost their colour, but some i^how traces of coloration as above described. It is pos- i^ible it reaches a considerably larger size, as none of mine appear to be quite adult. Its station would apnear to be fi-oni about .50 to 100 fathoms. PI. XIV., fig. 4. 58 NEW SJ'ECIE.s OF TASMANIA^ MOLLUSCA, ETC. Marginella obesula, sp. nov. Shell very small, broadly ovate, translucent white, with a distinct, but blunt spire of two whorls. Aperture narrow above, but widening rapidly towards the rounded front. Columella convex ; the first plait, which is a continuation of the front of the shell, is large, strong, and curved. The next above is much smaller and rather close to the first, above are four minute plaits, which reach quite two-thirds up the columella. Outer lip thickened, incurved in the middle, where it is armed with about nine minute teeth. Length, 2; breadth, 1.4 mill. Types, with six others, from Frederick Henry Bay, one other from Port Arthur. AVhilst this resembles such relatives as M. s]ii)r(^!i(niii , Prit. and Gat., it nevertheless has some good points of difference, and these are emphasised by the ver}^ peculiar animal, which, showing through the translucent shell, exhibits a bright orange colour, curiously netted with white lines, each bordered with black, empty shells show no traces of this peculiar ornamentation, which must belong to the animal. In our other small species the animal usuallv appears black or hornv. The habitat is also peculiar. Most of the speci- mens have been taken from roots of the giant kelp, show- ing it to inhabit rocky bottoms. PI. XIV., fig. 5. Marginella rixgens, sp. nov. Shell very simall, broadly pyriform, pure white, semi- transparent, with an exsert, but very small spire of two whorls, which has a tilt towards the right. Aperture broad, esjiecially towards the rounded front. Outer lip solid, shouldered, and much curved above, but straight on its inner side, where it bears about six small denticles rather irregular in size and spacing. Columella convex, but rather straight in its middle part, and carries about six plaits, of Avhich the first i?i a long, u]>ward 5weep from the base; the next two are well developed, those above being much smaller. Length, L8 ; breadth, 1.2. Type from Kelso, Taniar Heads, collected by the late Aug. Simson ; another exactly similar from the Petterd col- lection, probably from the same locality ; and eight others from 40 fathoms off Thouin Bay, which differ slightly in having more minute denticles on the lip, but are other- wise the same. 1!V W. L. MAY. 59 This is very close to M . nvrio^i , Crosse, of which it mav be a variant. It is more broadly shouldered, with a larger aperture, and has the toothed outer lip. PI. XIV., fig. 6. Margixei.la multidextata, ip. nov. Shell small, white, bx'oadly-ovate, spire hidden, aper- ture rather wide. Columella convex, bearing about nine main plications, of which the anterior three are the sti'ongest; there are several small subsidiary teeth between the upper ones. Outer lip ri^es above the summit; is strongly thickened and armed inside with about ten minute denticles. Length, 1.5; breadth, 1.2 mill. Tyjoe, with three others from about ten fathoms, be- tween Gordon and South Bruuy, P Entrecasteaux Channel. This species is nearest related to M. tliniiincitsi'i, I\Iay ; it differs in being shorter and broader, having a wider aperture, stronger dentition, and the crcnated outer lip. The small intercalated teeth have not been noticed in any other Ta?manian Marginella. PI. XIV., fig. 7. Margixella ixcehta, sp. nov. Shell minute, smooth, white, opaque, ovate; spire small but distinct, of two whorls. Aperture narrow above, almost linear for half its length, then widening to the rounded front. Outer lip moderatelv thickened, slightly cui-ved, smooth within. Columella convexly rounded, with two distinct plaits, rather near together, of which the anterior is the sti'onger. Length, 2; breadth, l.G mm. Type, with five others, from about 40 fathoms off Thoiiin Bay. This species closely resembles J/, frinr'nut'i , May, in size and shape; it has more spire, is broader, with a more curved columella, and onlv two i>laits. PI. XIV., fig. s. Iredale in Trans. N.Z. Inst, for 1914, p. 457, pro- posed a new genus Esteu for a Rissoid group, and men- tions Rixxoa rolumunria, Hedley and ^lay, as a good repre- sentative. We have a large number of specie;, which seem to fall naturallv into Iredale's genus. There are some seventeen Tasmanian named species, and others not yet 60 NKW SPECIES OF TASMANIA^ MOLLUSCA, KTC. described, that I can so place, only two or three of wliich are somewhat abberante. Amongst thean is a little sub- group of four species, closely allied to each other, upon which I now offer some observations, describing one as new. EsTEA TUMiDA, Tenison Woods. Described in these proceedings for 1875, p. 147, as; Diala tutnuhi, a figure was given by Tate and May for this species, PI. xxvi., fig. 67, which, however, is not cor- rect, but represents a nearly related species, which I am dealing with later. A careful examination of the types (two speci- mens) preserved in the Hobart Musieum, and which are very bleached, show it to be a good species, and of which I have taken a fair number of specimens, always from the roots of the giant kelp ; fresh shells are of a pinkish tinge, and have a narrow chestnut band below the suture, and two on the boclv whorl, one at the periphery, and the other on the base. The?ie bands are characteristic. The ribs are also bi-oad, strong, and oblique. I pre- sent a figure from a specimen compared with the type. PI. XV., fig. 9. EsTEA OLiVACEA, Duuker (7?/.vsur/). Kixx'ia (l/f'nipjiensis, Petterd, is an absolute synonym, as Tate and May correctly determined, the type being pre- served in the Hobart Museum. This species differs from E. tumid (I in it^ more squat shape, and more numerous ribs, which are narrower and straight ; they also form a nodular bead below the suture. It is common at Tamar Heads, but seems absent from the South, where its place is taken by the next species. PI. XV., fig. 10. EsTEA KERSHAWi, Tenisou Woods {Bixxoiiut). Rixxoinri l-crsliaini, Tenison Woods, P.R.S. Vict., 1877, p. 57. This was united with E . tnmida, by Tate and May, but examination of the typos in Melbourne Museum shows it to be a distinct, but closely related species. It has three adult whorls, instead of four, the ribs are straighter, and much more numerous, and the month is not so round, and it lacks the colour bands; the usual colour is yellowish- brown, with a pale band below the suture. It is found in the Derwent Estuary and D'Entrecasteaux Channel, and is common at Tamar Heads, with E. oUvacea, which it closely BY AV. L. MAY. (il resemble?, but may be distinguished by its mere cylindrical form, more numcious ribs, and the absence of the sutural bead. PI. XY., fig. 11. ESTK.V MICROCOSTA, sp. noV. Shell small, rather piipoid, solid, pinkish, the apical Avhorls are the darkest, the last half of the body whorl nearly white. Whorls five, rounded. The first two form a smooth proto-conch ; the three adult whorls are regularly axially ribbed, with very fine sharp ribs, which are some- what oblique, and become evanescent on the base. Aper- ture almo.st round, lip expanded all round. Length, 2.5; breadth, 1.2 mill. Type, with a number of others, from 100 fathoms seven miles East of Cape Pillar. This is closely related to J-J . krrshairi. It differs principally in the much more numerous and finer ribs, and rounder mouth, and its rather more cylindrical form. E. t(i, somewhat expanded anteriorly. Length, 2; breadth, .8 mill. Type, with two others, from 40 fathoms off Thouin Bay, one other from off Arch Island, D'Entrecasteaux Channel. I place this with Fisxop.v's, as it seems congeneric with the species assigned to that genus by Professor Tate, a location which I think requires confirmation. PI. XVI., fig. 19. LiPPISTES CONSOBRINA, Sp. nov. Shell small, whitish, smooth, pyramidal, timbilicate. Whorls four or five, including a smooth proto-conch of about two turns. The adult whorls are encircled bv rwo strong keels, the upper of which is the larger, and is a little above the centre of the whorl. These keels are separated by a furrow of about their own width. There are two additional keels on the base, the anterior of which encircles the umbilicus, which is deep, but rather narrow, and separated from the aperture by a strong columella pillar. Aperture rounded, outer lip strongly dentated by the keels. Length, 3; bi'eadth, 1.5 mill. Type, with three others, from 40 iathoms three miles East of Schouten Island. In these proceedings for 1910, p. 309, I recorded this species as L. gracilenfa, Brazier. I have since had an op- portunity of examining Brazier's type, which shows that the two forms are specifically distinct, (irarUcnta being much larger and more attenuate in the spire. Our shell comes between this and L. zofTxiru^, Hedley, which is similarly sculptured, but is only half the length, and has a different apex. PL XVI., fig. 20. CePvITHIOPSIS APICICOSTA, sp. 110V. Shell small, elongate, or narrowly pyramidal, whitish. Whorls eleven, inchuding a three-whorled proto-conch, which is strongly axially ribbed. Adult whorls moderately rounded, sutui'e well impressed ; sculpture, three nodulous keels of about equal size and distance encircle the whorls. They are separated by a deep groove, across which the nodules are connected by low axial ridges. There isi a BY W. L. MAY. 65 smooth keel on the base, which is otherwise plain. Aper- ture subquadrate? (rather broken), with a short anterior canal. Outer lip dentated by the sculpture. Length, 7; breadth, l.G mill. Type, from 100 fathoms seven milts East of Cape Pillar. Several others, mostly juvenile, from about 40 fathoms off Thouin Bay. This species is rather nearly related to ('. trixcu/pto, May, which was described from a half-grown shell. It is narrower, with weaker sculpture and a different, though somewhat related proto-conch, which seems to separate it from all other species. PI. XVI., figs. 21, 21a. Cerithiopsis mamilla, sp. nov. Shell small, pale brown, pyramidal. Whorls nine and a half, rounded, including a .«imooth, bulbous proto-conch of about two whorls. Adult sculpture consists of three main keels, which are more or less nodulous, the central one being rather the largest. They are separated by equal sized, smooth spaces. There is a small smooth keel below the others, which shows verv distinctlv on the base, which is smooth. Aperture subquadrate, inner lip very concave, outer lip dentated by the keels. There is H short anterior canal. The keels on the upper whorls are almost or quite smooth. As growth proceeds they become faintlv, irregularly nodulous. On the three last whorls the nodules are more distinct. Length, 5; breadth, 1.4 mill. Type, with ten others, from about 40 fathoms off Thouin Bay, East Coast. Whilst the shape of the shell is fairly constant, and the pullus alwavs the same, co-types show considerable variation in the sculpture; whilst most are similar to the type, they may be almost destitute of nodules, or there may be three strongly nodulous keels on all the adult whorls. PI. XVI., fig. 22. Orbitestella iredalei, sp. nov. Shell minute, discoidal, smooth, white, spire flat. Whorls about three and a half, square in section, bicarinate, the upper carina at the angle being the largest, and forming a spiral keel on the flat summit to the apex. The flattened part of the whorl between the angle and the suture is roundly elevated; base margined bv the lower keel, otherwise smooth except for lines of growth, which are in evidence over the whole shell, broadly, per- E 66 NEW SPECIES OF TASMANIAN MOLLUSC.A, ETC. spectively umbilicate to the apex. Aperture roughly quadrangular, wider than the height of the shell; at the outer edge bidentated by the keels. Diameter, 1 ; height, about .4 mill. Type, with a few others, from Frederick Henry Bay, taken from the roots of the giant kelp. This minute shell has a considerable resemblance to Cychjutretiia hasfow/, Gatliff, the type of Orhite>ifel!a, and I consider it congeneric; probably C. mayii, Tate, should also be included in this genus. Note. — The specimen from which the drawings were made was accidentally destroyed. PI. XVI., figs. 23, 23a, 23b. Patelloida corrodenda, sp. nov. Shell roundly cval, rather depressed, apex one-third from the anterior end, exterior furnished (in tlie type), with 20 radiating", smooth ribs, irregularly spaced, which extend from the summit to the margin, and several shorter ones, intercalated near the margin. The ribs are but slightly raised, dull white, the wider interspaces being black, apex eroded. Interior margin black, bearing white triangular spots opposite the ribs, with their sharper ])oinfc3 towards the edge. Behind these is a narrow pui'plish ring, then bluish, with a brownish-white centre. Length, 14; breadth, 11; height, 5 mill. Type, from the western shore of Frederick Henry While fairly constant in shape, it varies much in the number of ribs, sometimes being nearly twice as numerous as given above. The shell is often so much corroded that the sculpture only remains on the marginal third. The species is common at a spot near my home living on large diabase boulders, at about half-tide. 1 have not yet noticed it elsewhere ; it long escaped notice, as it is asisociated with Siphonarin (liemenenais of about the same size and general appearance. As thev are ex- posed to the air for several hours at every tide, they suffer extremely from erosion, even quite small ones being badly affected. It resembles P. fhimmea, Quoy and Gaim, in general shape. That species is destitute of ribs, but has fine axial strias, and a different interior coloration, and lives near low water mark. PI. XVII., figs. 24, 24a.. I$Y W. L. MAY. 67 COCCULINELLA TASMANICA, Sp. IIOV. Shell small, white, thin, smooth, narrowly oval, pyramidal, apex subcentral, margin much raised at each end. There is no sculpture, except faint growth lines. Length, 5: breadth, 2.G ; height, 2 mill. Tvpe, with a number of others, from forty to seventy fathoms along the East Coast. This species is a near ally of C. comprexm, Suter, from New Zealand, and C. oercitd, Hcdley, from New^ South Wales. It is neaicr the former, which is rather narrower, higher, and has line radial sculpture. The latter is nai'rower, flatter, and has an almost flat base. Prob- ably they are local forms of one variable species, in which perhaps some peculiarity in their place of attachment has determined the form of the base ; straight in one case, much cui'ved in the othei-s. All the specimens taken have been "dead" shells, but there a,re indications that in life they would be glassy and semi-transparent. PI. XVII., flg. 25. EuLiM.A. APiiELES, Tenison Woods. Described in these proceedings for 1878, p. 40. The tvpe was missing for many years, but was lately discovered, having been mislaid in the Tasmanian Museum. I here present a figure from the type, which is i^o marked by the author. I consider it to be an absolute synonym of E it lima aiti/ur, Angas. PI. XVII., fig. 26. EuLiMA MARGiNATA, Tenisou Woods. Described with the last and also recovered with it, and marked as tvpe by the author. This specimen I have also figured. It is given by Tate and Mav, P.L. Soc, New South Wales, for 1901, p. 381, as a prior name for Sfi/lifer hxhlercr. Petterd. This identification was in- correct. It is a true Eu/inui, and I believe it to be only a s-hort, stumny form of the variable E. aufjur, Angas. PL XVII., fig. 27. CoMiNELLA LiNEOLATA, Lamarck. This is a verv common mollusc on most parts of our toast, and varies much in size, form, and colom*. On the 68 NEW SPECIES OF TASMANlAN MOLLUSCA, ETC. western side of Frederick Henry Bay, in a rather exposed situation, a short, thick-set banded form is plentiful. On December loth of last year, I noticed they v/ere spawning under fairly large stones. The egg capsules formed dense masses, closely clustered together. The method adopted is for single capsules to be firmly attached at some di.stance apart ; then three or four others are fastened to the upper edges of these, giving the combination somewhat the ap- pearance of the growth of the prickly pear. The colo'ur is: ivory-white, the stalks whiter. I present drawings, which will give a better idea of the form than much descrip- tion. The height of the single specimen is about 9 mm., that of the cluster about 15 mm. PI. XVII., figs. 28, 28a. I can also' add to our list tlie following seven snecies and one variety already described by various authors. 1. Area metella, Hedley, P.L. Soc. N.S. Wales, 1917, p. 681, PI. li., f. 36-37. About a dozen single valves taken in 100 fathoms off Cape Pillar, and a few from other places on our East and South Coasts, from 10 fathoms downwards. 2. Pseudarcopar/ia bofaniea, Hedley, Roy. S. N.S. Wales, 1918, Supp. p. 27. This species seems confined to our Eastern and Southern Coasts, where it takes the place O'f P. virtorice, Gatliff and Gabriel, which is found in Basg Straits, and perhaps does not occur South East of the Furneaux Group, where I found it in profusion. 3. ZalajJais lissa, Suter, Crjdostrema, P. Mall. Soc, viii., p. 25, pi. ii., f. 10-11. A number of examples taken in Frederick Henry Bay from kelp roots. 4. Triphora mamiUata, Verco ; T. alhovittota , Hedley, var. mamillata, Verco, T.R.. Soc. S.A., 1909, p. 285. I recorded this in these proceedings for 1910, p. 309, as alhovittata, but our shells are Verco's variety, which I consider is quite sufficiently distinct to be given specific rank. It has also been taken in 40 fathoms off Thouin Bay. 5. TxirriteUa atkinsoni, Tate and May, var. w edioangulata , Verco, op. cit., 1910, p. 125, pi. xxx., fs. 8-9. Several from 50 fathoms Nox'th of Maria Island. p. & p. Roy. Soc. Tas., 1919. 28A J{Y W. L. MAY. 09 6. tJstea janjucensifi, GatliflF and Gabriel, Bhxoa, P.R. Soc. Vic, 1913, p. 67, pi. vili., f. 2. Three specimens from Penguin, North Coast, identified by Mr. Gabriel. 7. DidJa iranshirida, Hedlt^v, P.L.S. N.S. Wales, xxx., 1906, p. 522, pi. xxxiii., f. 35. Tate and May, op. cit., 1901, p. 388, retord this in error as D. j)icfa, A. Adams. A few examples have been taken iu DEntrecasteaux Channel, in about 10 fathoms. 8. Segment ina victorixr. Smith, P.L.S., 1881, ]). 296, pi. vii., f. 2. A number of specimens in my possession were collected many years ago by Mr. E. P. Harrisson in Lake Tiberias, and are exactly the same as Victorian shells. This makes an interest- ing addition to our fresh water fauna. 70 A RE-EXAMINATION OE PROFESSOR HASWELL'S TYPES OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOGONIDA. By Professor T. Thomson Flynn, B.Sc, Ralston Professor of Biology, University of Tasmania. Plates XVIII. -XXII., figs. 1-26. (Received 8th July, 1919. Read lltli August, 1919.) Diagnostic methods in the case of the interesting group of Pycnogonida have so far altered in the last thirty vears, that it needs no apology on my part for attempting a revision of the descriptions of Australian Pycnogonida published by Professor Haswell in the early eighties. This revision has been made possible by the courtesy of the trustees and curator of the Australian Museum, who placed the holotvpes at my disposal, and to whom I tender my best thanks. I have also to thank Professor S. J. Johnston of Sydney for the loan of other specimens collected for the use of his department. In the following description the specimens from the Australian Mviseum are indicated by the collection number. It is necessarv to state that the holotypes have been j^reserved as microscope slides, and while this is a con- venient method of preservation it has its disadvantages in the case of subsequent examinations. It is some- times impossible, for example, to make out with any de- gree of certaintv the arrangement and structure of the spines of the ovigers or even of its joints when, as is often the case, it is tucked under the body of the Pycno- gonid on a microscope slide. Further, while every care has been taken with the measurements it must be I'emem- bered that the flattening of the specimen necessary in preparing a miscrdscopic slide, alters very definitely the relation of breadth to length. Many of the works cited in the following pages are not procurable in Tasmania, and in these cases I have to depend on notes made when on a visit to Sydney. p. & P Roy. Soc. Tas.. 1919. Plate XVIII. T T. F del. Rhopalorh.nchus tenuissimus. figs 1-3 «Nsmphon aequidig latum, figs 4-5 BV riiOFESSOK T. THOMSON Fl-YNX, B SC. 71 Rhopalorhynchus tenuissimus, Haswell. (PI. XVIII., figs. 1-3.) 1884, Colo^xendei-i touiis.sima, Haswell, 1884, p. 1029, pi. 56, figs. 5-8. 1893, Rhopalorhynchus: rfarip/r^, Carpenter, 1893, p. 24, pi. II., figs. 1-10. 1908, JiliopcHorliynchus tenuissimus, Lonian, 1908, p. 24. 1909, Rhopalorhynchus tenuissimus, Thompson, 1909, p. 533. Specimen. — Australian Museum Collection, G519o, holotype, male. Port Denison, Queensland. Description. — It is only necessary to supplement in a small degree Prof. Haswell's account of this species. Vepha/on is short and narrow, not expanded in front. Segmentation is distinct. Ocular tubercle is situatevl on the posterior portion of the cephalon. It is cylindrical with a small rounded cone at tlie apex. Abdomen is present, but as usual in this genus is cjuite minute. Palps are ten jointed. The first joint is short and thick and expanded at the extremity; the second is very small ; the third joint is very long and slender ; the re- maining joints are as described bv Haswell. Ovif/ers. — Tlie character of the q)ines of vhe last few joints cannot be determined with accuracv as the joints had not been cleaned before the specimen had been mounted originally. The spines, however, seem to be long and sharp and arranged in several rows. Mea-^uriDiiiifs : — mm. Proboscis, length 4.41 maximum diameter 1.05 Trunk, length 5.28 width behind first crui'igers 29 ,, ,, second ,, 32 width across ,, ,, 1.58 Palj), first joint 12 second 07 third 2.92 fourth 19 fifth .-.. 1.53 sixth 31 seventh,, ... 38 eighth 42 ninth 40 tenth 38 72 A BK-EXAMINATION OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOGONIDA, mm. Leg, second coxa 48 third ,, 33 femur 5.76 first tibia ...' 5.47 second ,, 4.94 licmarlfi. — The holotype was taken in Port Denison, Queensland (depth not given). There is no doubt in my mind that li. clavipes (Car- penter) must be regarded as a synonym of R. te.iiuissiinv:t (Ha.^w). The lengths and proportions of the joints of the trunk, palps, and legs agree perfectly in tne two species. The proportion of the length of the proboscis to the trunk is 1:1.2 in 7?. tenuis.'tinius. In E. clavi/tes it is 1:1.1. The somewhat different shape of the proboscis in E. temii-^- simus is no doubt due to the distortion caused by the specimen being mounted as a microscope slide. It is possible that the cheliform arrangement of the terminal portion of the oviger may be confined to the male. Further, both species come from the Australian region of the Tropics. Nymphon .lEQUiniGiTATUM, Haswell. (PI. XVIII., figs. 4-5; pi. XIX., fig. 6.) 1884, Xi/iiijiho?) (r(jin'fht/ifaftt?n, Haswell, 1884, p. 1022, plate 56, figs. 1-5. 1889, Nyniplion aquidiyilatum, Whitelegge, 1889, p. 233. 1908, Nymphun crcptidigitatum, Loman, 1908, p. 38. Specimens : — Australian Museum Collection, No. G5196, holotype, $, Pt. Jackson; Australian Museum Collection, No. G5198, paratype, ^ ; Australian Museum Collection, No. G5197, paratype, 9 , Broughton Island. In addition, several spirit specimens from Port Jack- son and from Shark Island, Port Jackson, contained in the Australian Museum collection and that of the Zoological laboratory of the University of S3'dney. In view of the fact that this genus is an extraordin- arily large one, comprising very many species distinguished from one another by relatively insignificant characters, I have thought it desirable to re-describe naswell's s^pecies in some detail. Desrrljifion : — Body. — Fairly broad and stout, suture lines distinct, rruriger.s well separated, each a little longer than broad — cephalic aeciment large, its length being p. & P Roy. Soc. Tas.. 1919 T. T. F del. N/mphon ee:)uidigitatum, tig. 6 Pallene (?) valida, figs. 7-8 Pseudopallene pachycheira, tig 9 BY PROFESSOR T. THOMSON FLYNN, B.SC. 73 greater than that of the other segments together. (Jtphahm is much expanded in front, neck fairly narrow- but not particularly long. Proboscis large and stout, expanded in mid-region and tapering towards each end, the whole organ somewhat pear-shaped with smaller end forward. Chelifori well developed, scape uni-articulatc, expand- ed distally, about same length as proboscis, hand power- fully developed with fingers shorter than the palm, fingers crossing at the apex and possessing a large number of fine teeth. Palps five-jointed, first joint very small, second joint longest equalling the third and fourth taken together, fourth less than half the third, fifth joint long but a little shorter than the second, fourth and fifth joints finely setiferous, occasional spines on other joints specially towards end of third. (tviytrs. — Ten-jointed with ttiniinal claw, situated on slight ventral outgrowth in front of lii-st pair of legs. Th« proximal joints increase in length from the first, which is small, to the fifth, which is the largest joint of the limb; fourth joint is rather swollen and expanded distally; the fifth joint is long and narrow bearing distallv a fringe of long delicate hairs, as does also the sixth. This joint is about one third the length cf the fifth. The seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth joints are about equal in length, all gently curved and bearing pinnate spines. These spines vaiy in shape. In the ovigerous male thev are arranged in a single row on each joint. The middle spines of each row are long and stiletto-like, finely t(X)tiiet inn. — Bodii is fairly robust with all segments distinctly separated. Tlie rrnriffem are separated from one another by less than their own diameter. Cepholon is expanded with a prominent anterior mar- gin projecting over the proboscis. Above the ba.se of each chelophore on the cephalon is a prominent tubercle with two spines. The neck is well developed and short but fairly wide. Onthir Itdtfrrle is situated just behind the neck, im- mediately anterior to the level of the first pair of crurigers. Tliere are four w^ell developed eves. Tlie shane of the ocular tubercle is not determinable with accuracy, but it apipears to be low and rounded. Ahdnmen is short and rounded. Frohoscis is short and cylindrical diiected obliquely downwards. It is somewhat consti'icted in the middle, obtusely conical in front with a wreath of very delicate bristles round the mouth. The proboscis is inserted into 76 A RE-EXAMINATION OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOGONIDA, the ventral side of the cephalon some distance behind it» anterior margin. Chelophores have a simple scape with ovoid palm and short stumpy fingers. The hand is turned inwards in front of the moiith. The fingers are provided with many small teeth. The scape and palm possess a number of short hairs. Palps are four-jointed. They are much shorter than the chelophores, but extend well beyond the proboscis. The basal joint is short and thick, the next joint longer, the third joint longest. The fourth joint is shorter than the third but longer than the second. There are scat- tered hairs on all the joints, but on the last there is a well marked ventral fringe of setae. Ovir/erfi. — ^These are ten-jointed and do not possess a terminal claw. Haswell's description is accurate except in relation to the length of the sixth joint, which is longer than any of the other distal joints. Legs. — There is nothing to add to Haswell's descrip- tion of these. Cement glands are small and numerous. Male genital apertures occur on all limbs. Measurements, holotype, male, G5199. mm. Proboscis, length 81 greatest diameter 58 Trunk, length 2.71 width behind first crurigers 64 ,, ,, second ,, 53 width across , , , , ...... 1.74 Cephalon, length 1.19 width 91 Neck, width 38 Abdomen, length 31 Palp, first joint 18 second ,, ^0 third ,, 30 fourth ,, 20 Third leg, first coxa 47 .second , , 94 third , 63 femui' 2.40 first tibia 2.80 second ., 2.40 tarsus and propodus 1.29 claw 60 auxiliary claw 20 BY PROFESSOR T. THOMSON FLYNX, B.SC. (7 Remark<. — The specimens were obtained by dredging in Port Stephens, Now South Wales, but the depth is not given. I have provisionally placed this specimen in the genus Valhne. It does not agree with Hodgson "s definition of this genus (1910 page 225) and just as little with that given by Schimkewitsch (1909, pp. 8-9). The presence of the four-jointed palp in the male is a feature in which the piesent species resembles FdUtue fhniorplin , Hoek, with which it also agrees in the following points — the independ- ence of the posterior trunk segments, the forms of the spines on the ovigers, the finely-toothed chelophores. and the possession of auxiliarv claws. Pnlhne dimnr]>ha, however, possesses a terminal claw on the oviger, which is absent in /''. rrilida (see Lonuin, 1908, page 40). The presence of the palps, in mv opinion, would not allow of this species being included in the genus Para- [lalhne as proposed by Loman. If, as Thompson suggests (1909, p. 538) a new genus sliould be created, founded upon Hoek s description of Pallfiie dimorplui , then it is worthy of consideration that the new genus should be so defined as to include the species under discussion. PSEUDOPALLENE PACHYCHEIRA, Haswell. (PI. XIX., fig. 9; pi. XX., figs. 10-11.) 1884, Pallene pachycheira, Haswell, 1884, p. 1030, pi. 57, figs. 6-9. 1908, Parapalletie poclii/c/ieira, Loman, 1908, p. 47. Specimen. — Australian Museum Collection, G5194, holotypo ^ , Port Jackson. Dexrriptinn. — Bnr])/ is robust, smooth, with segments distinct. (!ruri(/ers are separated by small interspaces. Cephalon is expanded, strongly cleft in front. Neck is short and wide. Ocular tuherch is low and rounded, placed on posterior ])ortion of neck. Prohoxci^ is insei-tcd vcntrally into the cephalon, direct- ed obliquely downwards, very short, cylindrical at the base, conically pointed in front with a fringe of delicate setae round the mouth. Abdomen is short, tapering posteriorly. Chelophoref: are strong and powerful. Scape is single, palm greatly developed with fingers hanging in front of 78 A REEXAMINATION OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOOONIDA. mouth. Both fingers are wide, blunt, and untoothed. but bearing on each inner edge a single central rounded pro- jection. Palps are absent. Ovigers possess ten joints and a claw. First joint is short, second, third, and fourth are progressively longer. Fifth joint is long cui'ved and slender, distally expanded with a peg like process at this end, the process being crowned with a number of short seta?. Sixth joint is short, and the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth are progressively shorter. The last four joints are provided with a few bent compound spines arranged in a single row. The temiinal claw is long and sharp and is ornamented with fine teeth on the distal half of its inner edge and on the distal third of its outer edge. Legs. — The first and third coxae are short and sub- equal. The second is as long as the other two together and is distally expanded. The femur is a long joint a little longer than the combined coxae. The first tibia is a little shorter and expands distally. The second tibia is a little longer than the femur. The femur, first tibia, and second tibia are approximately divided into thirds by shallow transverse constrictions. All these joints are minutely spinous. The tarsus is short with a very small dorsal spine and a bunch of closely crowded ventral spines. The pro- j>odu3 is very stout, minutely spinous. On the sole, proximally, there are some four or five well developed spines. The distal half of the sole has smaller spines. The claw is large, strong, and curved, and is equal to moi^ than two-thirds the length of the propodus. Measurements, holotype $ , G5194. mna. Proboscis, length 90 diameter 56 Cephalon, length 78 greatest width 91 Neck, width • " .54 Ti-unk, length 2.06 width between first and second crurigers 45 width across second crurigers ... 1.44 Third right leg, first coxa 45 second ,, 1.09 third ,, 44 femur ,, 2.05 first tibia 1.82 tarsus and propodus 93 claw 51 p. & P Rov Soc Tas.. 1919. T T F del ^7 1-1 /-■ \, Pseudopallene pachycheira, figs 10-11 Anoplodactylus tubiferus, figs. 12-14 i y BY FROfESSOK T. THOMSON Kf-YNN, B.SC. iV Locality. — Port Jackson (depth not. given). Jieituirk.'i. — The general bodily form, the shape of tJie short proboscis witii its wreath of delicate hairs round the mouth, and the form of the chela fingers with their bud- like projections mark this species as belonging to the genus PseudojKiHene, Wilson, rather than Para [ui I hue. Carpen- ter, as suggested by Loman (1908, page 47). Haswell states that this species is related to Pallenr /a-vis, Hoek. As a matter of fact the two differ in a very fundamental point since in Fdlleuf l(pvi.<, each chelophore has a two- jointed scape, while in the ])resent species the scapo is simple. Anoplod.xctvlus tvbiferus, Harwell. (PI. XX., figs. 12-14; pi. XXT., fig. 15.) 1884, PiioxirhtUdium tuhifmnii, Ha.swell, 1884, p. 1032, pi. 57, figs. 1-5. 1889, Plioeicliilidiuni fuhlferuin, AVhitclegge, 1889, p. 233. 1908, Annplndactylus tubiferus, Loman, 1908, p. 72. 1910, Anoplodactyhis tiddferus. Cole, 1910, p. 288. Specimens. — Aus. Mus. Collection, No. G5202, holo- type $ , Port Jackson; Sydney University Zool. Collection, 2 Micro, slides, S > P-J- ; Sydney University Zool. Collec- tion, 1 Micro, slide, 9 P.J.; Sydney University Zool. Collection, 3 Spirit specimens labelled "Woollahra Point 2 or 3 fathoms." There is very little to add to ITaswcH's description of the holotvpe The following is to be regarded as supple- mentaiy to the original description: — Body narrow, rruriyfrx well separated, longer than wide and expanded distally. Trinik is widest at anterior end, while each succeeding segment is narrower than tlie one immediately preceding it. In old animals segments arc completely fused, in young ones only the hindmost two. Two characteristic dorsal spines occur on the body at the level of the second and third pair of crurigers. PrnhnscU is of the ?hapc de^scribcd bv Haswell. It is inserted into the ventral side of the cephalic segment which is continued beyond the insertion into the long well-defined and constricted neck characteristic of the genus Annplo- dactylus. In front of this neck the cephalon is slightly ex- panded. Upon this expanded portion an extraordinarily high ocular tubercle arises. This is not mentioned by Has- well in his description, but is shown by him in plate 57, fig 1, lying just alongside tlie right chcliforus. The pre- 80 A RE-KXAMINATION OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOGONIDA, sence of this long cylindrical tubercle no doubt has sug- gested the name of the species. At the apex of this column are four distinct eyes. Abdomen and chelifori are as described by Haswell. Pal2)s absent. Ovigers absent in the female. In the male each oviger is six-jointed, and the joints have the proportions stated by Haswell. The third joint, however, h?s a slight con- striction at about one-fifth the length of the joint from the proximal end. A few simple spines occur on the last few joints. Noteworlhv is the presence of a peculiar bent spine on the ventral side of the penultimate joint about one- third the distance from the jDroximal end. Legs. — These are as described by Haswell. The only alteration I have to suggest is that the particular spine of the second tibia is situated on a tubercle some little dis- tance from the distal end. Nervous system. — The nervous system of the species is well shown in some of the slides from the Sydney Univer- sity Collection, and it is of interest to point out that the arrangement of this system varies a little from that indi- cated by Loman (1917, p. 83). He figures Ano/jlodncfylus with but four ganglia, whereas most other pycnogonida have five, and suggests that owing to the reduction or dis- appearance of the ovigers and the absence of palps the an- terior ganglion which innervates these two organs has fused with the succeeding ganglia. In the species under discussion, nowever, the anterior ganglion, although small, is present, but is in contact with the next succeeding gang- lion. Genital openings. — Male openings occur on small tubercles at distal end of second coxfe of the two posterior pairs of legs. Female openings on all the pairs of legs. Measurements, holotype, male. mm. Proboscis, length 1.36 greatest diameter 38 Trunk, length 1.90 width across first pair of crurigers... 1.56 ,, behind ,, ,, ,, ,, 30 ,, behind second ,, ,, 30 ,, ,, third ,, „ 19 Abdomen, length 74 width near base 13 Neck, width 12 p. & P Roy Soc. Tas.. 1919 Plate XXI T, T. F. del. Anoplodactylus tubiferus, fig. 15 Ascorhynchus longico lis, figs. 16-17 Nymphopsis armatus, figs 18-20 BY PROFESSOE T. THOMSON FLYNN, B.SC. 81 mm. Ocular tubercle, height 58 width near base 12 Third i*ight leg, first coxa 36 second ,, 66 third , 42 femur 1.28 fii-st tibia 1.24 second tibia 1.12 tarsus and propodua 66 claw 44 Rtnuirk^. — ^This pycnogonid ha>; only been recorded from Port Jackson, where it occurs in various localities. Affi?iiiits. — Lonian (1908, p. 72) suggests that this .species resembles his Aiiujilodactyhts stylaps from the Banda Sea. ASCORHYNCHUS LONGICOLLIS, Haswell. (PI. XXI., figs. 16-17.) 1884 Ammothni lotn/icoUis, Haswell, 1884, p. 1028, pi. 56, figs. 1-4. 1889 Ammoflica Inmiicollis, Whitelogge, 1889, p. 233. 1908 Axcorltyiichus lonfjirnllia, Loman, 1908, p. 32. 1909 Eurycyde longicollin, Thompson, 1909, p. 533. Specimens. — Australian Museum Collection, G5195, holotype, female, Port Jackson ; Australian Mu.seum Col- fection, G5174. spirit specimen, probably male (ovigers missing), Port Jackson. Disrri/itii)ii. — liixly is long and slender with segmenta- tion well marked. The rnnit/erx are well separated from one another, and are much longer than broad. The third and fourth pairs are a little closer than any of the preced- ing pairs. The posterior pair are directed somewhat bark- Avard. Each ciiiriger possesses a well marked dorsal tuber- cle at the distal end. Cephalon is very slightly expanded in front, and is continued backwards into a long and narrow neck. - Above the base of each chelophore is a small tubercle. A little more than half the distance along the neck occur two prominent lateral '"cervical processes" to which the ovijrers are attached. Just dorsal to these is the om/ar luherr^e, a fairly prominent rounded eminence with visual elements poorly developed and not pigmented. Behind this the neck is slightlv wider than in front. Proboscis has the shape of a long oval and possesses a short scape. It is directed downwards. I' 82 A RE-EXAMINATION OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOGONIDA, Abdomen is long and narrow and slightly expanded at the apex. Chelophores are as described by Haswell. Pahps consist of ten joints, not of nine as stated by Haswell. As Loman has suggested, the single basal joint in the original description really consists of two joints. The most proximal is short and thick, the next is quite small. The remainder agree with Haswell's- description, except of course that in numbering the joints allowance must be made for the missing segment. Ovigerfi are ten jointed. Unfortunately thev are miss- ing in the case of the spirit specimen. The length of the joints agrees with Haswells account. Legs. — Genital openings, female, occur on the coxae of all legs. For the rest, there is nothing to add to Haswell's description. Measurements, holotype, female G5195. mm. Proboscis, length 3.08 greatest diameter 1.41 Cephalon, greatest length 2.55 anterior width 74 Neck, anterior width 35 posterior ,, 52 Trunk, length 5.23 width behind first crurigers 57 width across second crurigers 3.30 Abdomen, lemgth 1.54 Palp, first joint 33 second ,, 06 third ,, ' 1.45 fourth ., 48 fifth ,, 92 sixth ,, 28 seventh , , 44 eighth ,, 48 ninth ,, 33 tenth ,, 36 Third leg, first coxa 87 second,, 1.10 third ,, 80 femur 2.55 first tibia 3.96 second tibia 2.42 tarsus 1.18 propodus 1.10 claw 1.18 ny puoKKSsoR t. Thomson flvnn, is.sc. • 83 Rfjuarka. — This species has only been recorded fx-oni Port Jackson (depth not stated). Although Thompson (1909, page 533) suggests that this specimen belongs to the genus Eurycyfh, nevertheless the slender bodv, the large proboscis, and the simple scape of the chelophores, put it undoubtedly in the genus Aworhynchus. Nymphopsis gen. Ilaswell. Genotvpe yi/in/tliojisis (irmatus — Australian ^Museum Coll. G5201. 1884 NynvplwimK, Haswell, 1884, p. 1025. 1887 Nymphojtsis, Schimkewitsch, 1887, p. 272. 1906 Nymph, lists. Cole, 1906, p. 218. 1008 Nymphopsis, Lonian, 1908, p. 49. 1909 Nymphopsis, Thompson, 1909, p. 534. 1912 N ympJiopsis, Loman, 1912, p. 3. 1915 Nymphopsis, Loman, 1915, p. 204. This genus was first defined by Haswell. IIis descrip tion is as follows: — " Fimt pair of appindayes ivfll developed, chidiforvi, " secmid pair tirlL devflopfd, palpiform n'iih nine joint x. '' Third pair icith seven jointii, none oj Uitm provided with " CO II, pott nil spiufs." In 1887 Schimkewitsch obtained another species (N. korotntwi) referable to this genus, and by comparing the charactei-3 of his own species with Ifaswell's description of N. armatus, came to the conclusion that Haswell s speci- men was immature. Schimkewitsch therefore re-defined the genus as follows : — " Ce yeurt' pn scnfe les niandibitles (I.) iriariicufcet!, pas *' chcliftnmeH, les extremifes II. 10 articulieii, les exirenii/.es " 111. 10 articuli'es, privees du crochet el des epines pliiini- ^^ formes, V article tar sale (8) des exlremites IF. - VII. est "7ntini dipini'is basulfs et de crochets secondaires lout H Jait " radimeuiairts (an mains chez notre ecpcce)." Loman's (1908) definition goes much further, and in substajice is as follows: — " Body segments qnite coalescent, lateral processes separate " Proboscis hirye, thick, arid moveable ; chelifori delicate, shaft " ttco jointed, jiincers delirate, occasionally rudimentary in " older animals. Palps nine jointed, second and fourth joints " I'luyest, the remainder short. Ovigers of male slender, Jourth ^^ joint very long also the second and fifth, distal joints tmall, '' terminal joint long. No toothed spines, only hmrs or plates. 84 A RE-EXAMINATIOX OF AUSTRALIAN PYCNOGONIDA, 'Female oviger short, particuJadij the middle jointa, feet 'powerful. Cement gland as in Ammothea, accessory claws ' small or absent. Female gevAtnl opeiiings on all pairs (?), ' male openings on posterior tioo })iiirs of legs. Eggs sm,