tee ‘ or ha ; | | = ” wa ohnda Wh " if ’ | ee | : "> be i [Pre We-w O henenn a ‘ . -s | ’ * Ta. , Ms eo a : ae i : = . : - hs | | ; he, “fe ti the uh | 3 | ; i! -ae a IHF DS Par ved | : | 7" : etm > ¢ £4 : e 3 : fing f i i ‘ ' j " on —- \ ALAA —t $06 ane Ms 4 * a oan —. 2 4 CO morene abe peewee my ge tree = Tres ereetnaeae Hey ee vee nt nem Morrie ancrameaig ea Zs - eee thle ne " tas = errr ena cme ST anthracene eres ene i Oo ccoracolees of re ee ser >. PS athe pate sere VERE tae Ore Wreraleys oleate ean et Peps c@ TOOL Ge vee Oe OF 98 Gen one wre ~ [20 Hettetyr eg, oe a Oe re ae — & & A. ~~ a Vet VEERT) Pot essyeecueae SEeyo ce ow S -~we ~~ net ~~ “~\N ~ ENS aN fh. Ap Ar , . » A ad VS SONS “SS way: ne) te EI A ABD RAL BIS LES SO hoe] ORR » ~ElCE Trey ~~ Vw Y~ -—Wesww* g* wiv g y roe epee eR BEGVEEBSUU SSS Vue eS TT Sete Ree Se See 85 OC we = "www v~ ew’ Iwe : A. ny eww ~ = dl Sane Sry Are Seg. ~~~ TSS" gages gebe . Cw ~—oww VV 7 ~=N Yeu vve "we . S Cw 7 © .- toi w ws wy \w - he «g - wy = Vu y i Le | RTRINA 9 SV SBVMy -St a w SV IVY < } A cs 11—8625 SS SESSNSN Vw VU weryvery: SAD ADARARS \ wee PREV ES ‘wwe. SalpSalo“alnalns~a]a alo apnZay OsFICR ES PATENT OFFICE SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY UNITED STAT GOVERNMENT PRINTING ww, & ~o ‘oe SF ww Sy ~ Y vy» AS, bed ~ ws cacy Cay yw ~e ns ap ve Piste “woe / .. wr esses Veo” os tA ~vrww 2, - wig a ans SSO See ey igerye' wu) | Veter St sé S “ww v ee ww Lev ‘3 ~~ wy ie rN sowursweus jure Wgsue \ AINE + SOU GVPS TESS; Ale fe Rh he = nf . | ~~ ey ARPA IS AN “4 . CO OC COL EP BEUES SS: _ r ag ba MY ws th bad ey Po Ntctede \ ~ > ths wy Rewer so ( ( ( — Cc an ~ & ~~ a ~ [ aa a a a NN G4 (C OY Corm@ee ~~ = ~ a a A ~ W ro ‘ p ~arA nA” | aN =~ a PDs \ aA ~ MAR: Py PSA A mA a! 7a AN \ am, Aa a” YY NeGile: =~ eo q a +. N'A WAA aRAARA = AnAArArn aa AAA ~ ln ee cea az pm . oT = ( ( ¢ é { 4 (CAE << ( ( ~w i CE C COE COTE CECE ema we ; r Ln P aa a ae, | wy ao > SACTARARA ane Ap ON ax Ae KE LUE CC CER CCE WE KEE CE OE 7 aaa” ma ks 7 a” Aono ay ey 2a Aa aa o © ‘qGg 4_4a Ge , ‘ ( o C(MLE]EERKE € & &E C ‘ ~ ~~ FY a mA ae ( (EE COC, HE OO EE COB GE Oe - Ct ~ am, a . AN iaAAA A aaae a Pe aa o A ~ RAwA -~ a ee, n arr ~ \ A, siesta (ten Lol ys sy, & a V = ~~ — An ay. \ o~ ~N ~ ioteny = a -_ ~ i bas | SANA mARAADAR” Aan: Ane NA Pp Na CO GA MF | CF LE” ME GE We LAY G&@ ( QQ «Cc €¢ Ga «a ¢ ¢ 4 a» oN a TY aA rN ™~ a rr co : ~ Yale ~ “a a ( CG Et ryy vy yy. PT a! « Ty a s Gn ie eae aan © wie + +) = . f + Soe 5 ra - PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS, \ , OF THE ~~ ROYAL SOCIETY OF : LONDON. FOR THE YEAR MDCCC. 3: PART 1 4 LONDON, ———ae ll PRINTED BY W. BULMER AND CO. CLEVELAND-ROW, ST. JAMES’S ; AND SOLD BY PETER ELMSLY, PRINTER TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY. MDCCC. We ii J Paes OS, ADVERTISEMENT. ‘Tine Committee appointed by the Royal Society to direct the pub- lication of the Philosophical Transactions, take- this opportunity to acquaint the Public, that it fully appears, as well from the council- books and journals of the Society, as from repeated declarations which have been made in several former Transactions, that the printing of them was always, from time to time, the single act of the respective Secretaries, till the Forty-seventh Volume: the Society, as a Body, never interesting themselves any further in their publication, than by occasionally recommending the revival of them to some of their Se- cretaries, when, from the particular circumstances of their affairs, the Transactions had happened for any length of time to be intermitted. And this seems principally to have been done with a view to satisfy the Public, that their usual meetings were then continued, for the im- provement of knowledge, and benefit of mankind, the great ends of their first institution by the Royal Charters, and which they have ever since steadily pursued. But the Society being of late years greatly enlarged, and their com- munications more numerous, it was thought advisable, that a Com- mittee of their members should be appointed, to reconsider the papers read before them, and select out of them such as they should judge most proper for publication in the future Transactions; which was accordingly done upon the 26th of March, 1752. And the grounds A@2 L iv J of their choice are, and will continue to be, the importance and sin- gularity of the subjects, or the advantageous manner of treating them ; without pretending to answer for the certainty of the facts, or pro- piety of the reasonings, contained in the several papers so published, which must still rest on the credit or judgment of their respective authors. It is likewise necessary on this occasion to remark, that it is an esta- blished rule of the Society, to which they will always adhere, never to give their opinion, as a Body, upon any subject, either of Nature or Art, that comes before them. And therefore the thanks which are frequently proposed from the Chair, to be given to the authors of such papers asare read at their accustomed meetings, or to the persons through whose hands they receive them, are to be considered in no other light than as a matter of civility, in return for the respect shewn to the So- ciety by those communications. The like also is to be said with re- gard to the several projects, inventions, and curiosities of various kinds, which are often exhibited to the Society ; the authors whereof, or those who exhibit them, frequently take the liberty to report, and even to certify in the public news-papers, that they have met with the highest applause and approbation. And therefore it is hoped, that no regard will hereafter be paid to such reports and public notices; which in some instances haye been too lightly credited, to the dishonour of the Society. CONTENTS. 1. THe Croonian Lecture. On the Structure and Uses of ithe Mem- brana Tympani of the Ear. By Everard Home, Hsq. &% R. S. , page 1 If. On the Method of determining, from the real Probabilities of Life, the Values of Contingent Reversions in which three Lives are involved in the Survivorship. By William Morgan, Esq. F. R.S. p. 22 III. Abstract of a Register of the Barometer, Thermometer, and Rain, at Lyndon, in Rutland, for the Year 1798. By Thomas Barker, Esq. p. 46 IV. On the Power of penetrating into Space by Telescopes ; with a comparative Determination of the Extent of that Power in natural Viston, and in Telescopes of various Sizes and Con- structions ; illustrated by select Observations. By William Herschel, LL.D. F. B.S. Pp. 49 V. A second Appendix to the improved Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy, inserted in the Philosophical Transactions for the Year 1798, containing some further Remarks, and improved Yormule for computing the Coefficients A and B; by which the arithmetical Work is considerably shortened and facilitated. By the Rev. John Hellins, B.D. F.R.S. and Vicar of Potter’s Pury, in Northamptonshire. p. 86 VI. Account of a Peculiarity in the Distribution of the Arteries sent to the Limbs of slow-moving Animals ; together with some Cw other similar Facts. In a Letter from Mr. Anthony Carlisle, _ Surgeon, to John Symmons, Esq. F. R. S. p. 98 VII. Outlines of Experiments and Inquiries respecting Sound and Light. By Thomas Young, M. D. F. R.S. In a Letter to Edward Whitaker Gray, M. D. Sec. R.S. p. 106 VIII. Observations on the Effects which take place from the De- struction of the Membrana Tympani of the Ear. By Mr. Astley Cooper. In a Letter to Everard Home, Esq. F. R.S. by whom some Remarks are added. p: 158 1X. Experiments and Observations on the Light which is spon- taneously emitted, with some Degree of Permanency, from various Bodies. By Nathaniel Hulme, M.D. F.R.S. and A.S. p. 162 X. Account of a Series of Experiments, undertaken with the View of decomposing the Muriatic Acid. By Mr. William Henry. Communicated by the Right Hon. Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. PRS. p. 188 XI. On a new fulminating Mercury. By Edward Howard, Esq. F.R.S. p. 204, APPENDIX. Meteorological “fournal kept at the Apartments of the Royal Society, by Order of the President and Council. " 4 \ s ' 7“ ’ ‘ : y . ’ fof ba - ,, f . as ‘ 4 { -— a * es oy 7 Py, - ‘ad " A e s, ys i " s i Ld aan . é cu ACW fey ts. 9 4 — y lb ¥ = f ; g es ia ye aasl ee. ee a adel ~ ; eve pro . wae Mt i quran dene sig q Pr = } - M = ; ae a. ey i - ; By a 47) ‘ ‘ x ‘ wee ry ‘ ra aA * 9 - AF “ ae ‘ae oa pre. my Day ae f Pe ~ pers rransve aero ols Yo ay: moa bes ts atagal a ~ henenoll e' ‘yaato!- vanvaot) ae ne ‘by Of) eQOT T tE9¢-9 - nomsio® bevongint bed ih, iB iL ce A 2 emt wnol: ie ; 4 Ae cc teas, ree eed) SER Eee J ae i d 7 , el’ a idea 3 eal eit LyTES OOva sea sult 10 => ' { : - * / ~ - > z ae - h =. > a ca a \ ; 2s eae ” 2 ry ‘ES Ce isa q ; . Vm’ 2 & “ 5 ab —/ - ’ i 3 ee 5 = s - ff 7” x © P ¢ . - 1 . a ~~) z > id ; i 4 , a. : > BaN. re a rs ry > Rempel ooh ugk dpa: fg ae, sito oaee wae 169i ie ee ces be ai Shores * i L 5 a ro eat ; - ca ba tee cere hk is mie ae . .- ew - 4 x . 4 ek = ; mis : a 4 . iy a a < ‘ Be ut Rea Je Ao ; * \ ) } : ; ' x of aD A > a th ; x ad ie Caio x re «X = A iy ‘ oe A ¥ i te “ i € i se ? i o J $ ee pales ign engenten ed we k : r ty — ; a 4 cet ‘ _ ot f a - J be J ei ; is = . yet ash ~ AN a f ds | : Z - a = 5 Vy ) ; iy “ i t ‘ = : - >= - yc THE Presipent and Councit of the Royar Society adjudged, for the year 1799, the Medal on Sir Goprrey Coprey’s Donation, to the Rev. Jon Heruins, B.D. F.R.S. for his improved Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy, &c. printed in the Philosophical Transactions for the year 1798, and his other mathematical papers. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. I. The Croonian Lecture. On the Structure and Uses of the Mem- brana Tympani of the Ear. By Everard Home, Esq. F. R. S. Read November 7, 1799. Tue subject of inquiry appointed by the Croonian Institution, has been greatly elucidated at different times by ingenious mem- bers of this learned Society. A large field, however, still re- mains open; and, respecting future investigations, I shall have occasion to offer a fresh proof of the aid to be derived from comparative anatomy, in ascertaining the structure of parts which, from their minuteness and situation in the human body, admit with much difficulty of being explored. The principal object of the present lecture is to communicate a discovery of the structure of the membrana tympani; which, in some respects, affords a new and very curious instance of the application of muscular action, and may conduce to account for certain phenomena in the sense of hearing, in a more satis- factory manner than has hitherto been proposed. The membrana tympani has always been considered as a MDCCC, B g Mr. Home’s Lecture common membrane, which, by means of muscles belonging to the malleus being stretched or relaxed, became fitted, in its various degrees of tension, to convey the vast variety of ex- ternal sounds to the internal organ. Its shape, situation, and office, have procured it the name of drum of the ear; and the muscles of the malleus having been deemed sufficient for bra- cing and unbracing it, less attention was bestowed on the struc- ture of the membrane itself: to which may be added, that in the human ear, and generally in the ear of quadrupeds, the membrane is so extremely small and thin, and in its situation so peculiarly confined, as not to be got at for inspection but with much difficulty. The case is different in the elephant, where this membrane is so very large, that the parts of which it is composed are readily distinguished: they are even conspicuous to the naked eye; and muscular fibres are seen passing along the membrane, in a radiated manner, from the bony rim which surrounds it, towards the handle of the malleus, to which the central part of the membrane is firmly attached. This discovery in the elephant having led to that of a simi- lar construction in the human membrana tympani, it may not be improper to relate the circumstances by which I became engaged in the investigation of the organ of hearing in that animal. Three different opportunities have occurred of dissecting the elephant in London, by the deaths of those which had been presented to his Majesty, and were kept at the King’s stables at Pimlico. One of them was given to the late Dr. HunTER; one to his brother Mr. J. HUNTER; and the third to Sir AsHToN “LEVER. pel on the Membrana Tympani. g From my being connected with Mr. Joun HunrTer’s pursuits in comparative anatomy, I was employed throughout the whole of these dissections, and became extremely desirous of exami- ning the internal parts of the ear, the structure of that organ in the human body having at a very early period particularly en- gaged my attention ;* but neither Dr. Hunrer nor his brother could be prevailed upon to sacrifice so large a portion of the skull as was necessary for the purpose. When Mr. Corse arrived from Bengal, last year, and men- tioned his having brought over a number of skulls of elephants, in order to show the progress of the formation of their grind- ing teeth,-+ the desire to examine the organ of hearing in that animal recurred to me so strongly, that I requested to have one of the skulls for that purpose, and Mr. Corse very readily and obligingly complied with my request. After having examined the organ in the dried skull, the want of the membrana tympani, and of the small bones, made the information thus received of a very unsatisfactory nature, and increased the desire of seemg these parts in the recent head. In considering how this could be done, I recollected a mutilated elephant’s head, preserved in spirits, which had been sent to * Tn the year 1776, I injected the cochlea and semicircular canals of the human ear with a composition of wax and rosin. This was done by placing the temporal bone in the receiver of an air pump, the upper part of which was in the form of a funnel, ren- dered air-tight by a cork being fitted into its neck, and surrounded with bees’ wax. After the air had been exhausted, the hot injection, poured into the funnel, melted the wax, and the cork was pulled out by means of a string previously attached to it; the injection immediately rushed into the receiver, and was forced, by the pressure of the atmosphere, into the cavities of the temporal bone. + On this subject, a very ingenious paper has been since published by him, in the Philosophical Transactions for the year 1799. Be A Mr. Home’s Lecture Mr. Hunter, but, from the multiplicity of his engagements, had remained neglected in the cask at the time of his death, and in the following year was dried, to show the proboscis, that it might not be altogether spoiled. Upon examining this dried head, the bones had been so much broken, that one of the organs of hearing was altogether want- ing: the other, however, was fortunately entire; and the mem- brana tympani and small bones, having been little disturbed in the drying of the parts, remained nearly in their natural situation. The membrana tympani, and every other part of the organ, were found to be much larger in proportion than in other qua~ drupeds, or in man; differing in this respect from the eye of the elephant, which is unusually small, when compared with the enormous bulk of the animal. The membrane was found of an oval form; the short dia- meter of the oval rather more than an inch in length; the long diameter an inch and ths. In the human ear, the membrana tympani is nearly circular; the longest diameter is =8ths of an inch; the shortest Uths. As the membrane in the elephant exceeds that of the human ear in thickness as much as in extent, which is as the squares of their diameters, or in the proportion of 19% to 14, it is natu- ral to conclude that the muscular fibres which are to stretch the one, must greatly exceed in strength those capable of producing the same degree of tension in the other. From this statement, the muscular structure in the human membrana tympani will necessarily be so much less distinct than in the elephant, as scarcely to be visible to the naked eye, and will easily be overlooked by the most attentive observer, who is not directed by some previous information to examine on the Membrana Tympani. - it under the most favourable circumstances; but, when these are attended to, it can be perceived without the aid of glasses. If the membrana tympani of the human ear is completely exposed on both sides, by removing the contiguous parts, and the cuticular covering is carefully washed off from its external surface, then, by placing it in a clear light, the radiated direc- tion of its fibres may be easily detected. If a common magnify- ing glass is used, they are rendered nearly as distinct as those of the elephant appear to the naked eye; their course is exactly the same; and they difler in nothing but in being formed upon a smaller scale. When viewed in a microscope magnifying 2g times, the muscular fibres are beautifully conspicuous, and appear uni- formly the same throughout the whole surface, there being no central tendons, as in the diaphragm; the muscular fibres ap- pear only to form the internal layer of the membrane, and are most distinctly seen when viewed on that side. In examining this membrane in different subjects, the parts were frequently found in a more or less morbid state. In one instance, the membrane was found loaded with blood-vessels, was less transparent than usual, and was united by close adhe- sion to the point of the long process of the incus. In another instance, there was a preternatural ossification adhering to it, at a small distance from the end of the handle of the malleus. As muscles in general are supplied with blood-vessels in pro- portion to the frequency of their action, it is an object of im- portance to determine the vascularity of the membrana tympani. Upon this subject, my own want of information has been amply supplied by Dr. BaiLuiz, who, in a communication upon this subject, showed me a preparation of the membrane, in which 6 Mr. Home’s Lecture the vessels had been most successfully injected with coloured wax. In this preparation, the most beautiful of the kind I ever saw, -the vessels in their distribution resembled those of the iris, and were nearly half as numerous: they anastomosed with one an- other in a similar manner, and their general direction was from the circumference to the handle of the malleus; from near this handle, a small trunk sent off branches, in a radiated manner, which anastomosed with those which had an opposite course. This correspondence, in the number and distribution of blood- vessels, between the membrana tympani and the iris, is a strong circumstance in confirmation of that membrane being endowed with muscular action. In the horse, the membrana tympani is smaller than in man; its long diameter is =8ths of an inch; the short one =Sths; and it is almost quite flat, while in man it is concave, which makes the difference of extent considerably exceed the difference in the diameters. In the horse, the fibrous structure is not visible to the naked eye; it is even indistinctly seen when viewed through a common magnifying glass; but in a microscope it is very visible, and in every other respect agrees in structure with the membrane in the human ear, and in that of the elephant. In birds, the membrana tympani is larger in proportion than — in the quadruped, and more circular in its shape. In the goose, it is ths of an inch in its longest diameter, and $ths in its shortest diameter. In the turkey, =.ths by =.ths. It is thinner in its coats in birds than in the horse, and to the naked eye has no appearance of fibres; but, when viewed in a microscope, there is a visible radiated structure, not very unlike the wire marks upon common writing paper. on the Membrana Tympani. 4 In a former Lecture upon the Structure of Muscles,* in which a comprehensive view was taken of the subject, it was stated, that the organization necessary for muscular contraction could exist in an apparent membrane, and that a fasciculated structure was only necessary when muscular action was to be enabled to overcome resistance. The coats of the Tzenia hydati- gena were mentioned as an instance of the first; and the human heart as the most complex of the second. In comparing the membranz tympani of different animals, they afford a beautiful illustration of the truth of this position. In birds, where from the smallness of its size the resist- ance is very trifling, the membrane is very similar to the coat of an hydatid, only still thinner. In the elephant, fibres form- ing fasciculi are very distinct. The membrane of the horse, and that of the human ear, form the intermediate gradations. The knowledge of a muscular structure in the membrana tympani, enables us to explain many phenomena in hearing, which have not hitherto been accounted for in a satisfactory manner. It is principally by means of this muscle that accu- rate perceptions of sound are communicated to the internal or- gan, and that the membrana tympani is enabled to vary the state of its tension, so_as to receive them in the quick succession in which they are conveyed to it. In the human ear, and in that of birds, the radiated fibres of the membrana tympani have their principal attachment to the extremity of the handle of the malleus, which is nearly in the centre of the membrane. In the membrane of the elephant, which is oval, the attach- ment to the handle of the malleus is at some distance from the * Philosophical Transactions for the year 1795. 8 Mr. Home’s Lecture centre. In the horse, deer, and cat, which have the membrane still more oval than the elephant, the handle of the malleus is situated in the long axis of the membrane, with its extremity extending beyond the centre, reaching nearer to the circumfe- rence; and the fibres of the radiated muscle are not only at- tached to its end, but also laterally to nearly the whole length of its handle. This oval form of the membrana tympani, in those quadrupeds, and the very extensive attachment of the fibres of the radiated muscle to the handle of the malleus, may be the reason why their ears are not equally fitted to hear inarticulate sounds, as the ears of birds and of man. Should this radiated muscle of the membrana tympani (which is probably the smallest in the body that has a distinct action) be thought too insignificant to have an office of so much con- sequence assigned to it, let it be remembered, that the size of muscles is no indication of their importance, but only of the resistance to be overcome by their action; and that the more delicate actions are performed universally in the body by very small muscles, of which the iris in the eye furnishes a very con- spicuous example. Before the mode in which the radiated muscle adapts the membrana tympani to different sounds can be explained, it is necessary that the more important parts of the organ should be enumerated, and the use commonly assigned to each of them pointed cut. In man and the more perfect quadrupeds, this organ consists of the following parts: the membrana tympani, situated be-- tween the external passage and the cavity of the tympanum; four smail bones, which form achain across the tympanum, on the Membrana Tympani. 9 connecting the membrana tympani with another membrane lining the foramen ovale, which opens into the vee aEIaaL a more internal part of the organ of hearing. The bones are, the malleus, which is united to the membrana tympani by a portion of its handle, and to the second bone or incus by its head. ‘The incus, which is connected to the mal- leus by a capsular ligament, forming a regular joint, the sur- faces of the bones being covered with cartilage, but they have only a tremulous motion on one another. The incus is also attached to the side of the cavity of the tympanum, where the mastoid cells open, by a ligament on which it moves back- wards and forwards: it is united by its long process to the orbicular bone, which is the smallest in the body, and connects the incus to the fourth bone or stapes, which has its base ap- plied to the foramen ovale, or opening leading into the cavity of the vestibulum. The cavity of the tympanum, in which these bones are si- tuated, communicates with the external air by means of the Eustachian tube, so that there is always air behind the mem- brana tympani. The malleus has three muscles, by which it is moved; one of them is called the tensor, from its pulling the malleus in- wards, and tightening the membrana tympani: the other two act in an opposite direction, and relax the membrane; the lar- gest of these is called the obliquus, and is the antagonist of the tensor muscle; the other is very small, and is called the laxator. The stapes has one muscle, which. acts upon it by bringing its basis closer to the foramen ovale. The vestibulum, which is completely separated from the tympanum, by the membrane that lines the foramen ovale, com- Mpcee. A Cc 10 Mr. Home’s Lecture municates freely with the cochlea and semicircular canals; but these cavities are filled with a watery liquor, and have no com- munication (as the tympanum has) with the external air. This fact was ascertained in the horse, by the following ex- periment, repeated several times. The organ of hearing was separated from the skull immediately after death, and the ca- vity of the tympanum exposed; the parts were then immersed in water, and the stapes removed ; by which means, the mem- brane of the foramen ovale was destroyed, but no globule of air was seen to escape through the water.* The following uses have generally been assigned to the parts now mentioned. | The membrana tympani was supposed to be adapted to re- ceive impressions, by the combined action of the tensor and laxator muscles varying the degree of its tension, so as to bring it in unison with different sounds: these impressions were con- ducted, by the chain of bones, to the vestibulum, cochlea, and semicircular canals ; in which cavities, particularly the cochlea, they were supposed to undergo some modification, before they were impressed upon the nerves spread upon the linings of these cavities. The function of modifying impressions of sound was assign- ed to the cochlea, partly from the delicacy of its internal struc- ture, supposed to resemble a musical instrument, and partly from there being no other part of the organ apparently suited for repeating the variety of delicate sounds which pass into the ear: the changes that couid be produced upon the membrana * This experiment was made by Mr. CiiFr, who superintends Mr. Hunt er’s col- lection, and who has afforded me material assistance in the different parts of this investigation. on the Membrana Tympani. 11 tympani by the muscles of the malleus, being considered as in- capable of answering that purpose. This slight sketch of the organ of hearing, and of the uses, as they are generally understood, of the different parts, will enable me to point out, with more clearness, what parts of the theory appear defective, and what improvements may be made on it. \ It is true that the membrana tympani is stretched and re- laxed by the action of the muscles of the malleus, but not for the purpose alleged in the commonly received theory. It is stretched, in order to bring the radiated muscle of the membrane itself into a state capable of acting, and of giving those diffe- rent degrees of tension to the membrane which empower it to correspond with the variety of external tremors: when the membrane is relaxed, the radiated muscle cannot act with any effect, and external tremors make less accurate impressions. The membrana tympani, with its tensor and radiated muscles, may be not unaptly compared to a monochord, of which the membrana tympani is the string; the tensor muscle the screw, giving the necessary tension to make the string perform its proper scale of vibrations; and the radiated muscle acting upon the membrane like the moveable bridge of the monochord, ad- justing it to the vibrations required to be produced. The com- bined effects of the action of these muscles give the perceptions of grave and acute tones; and, in proportion as their original conformation is more or less perfect, so will their actions be, and, consequently, the perceptions of sound which they com- municate. This mode of subdividing the motions of the membrana tympani between two sets of muscles, allotting a portion to Ce 12 Mr. Home’s Lecture each, is not peculiar to this part. A remarkable instance of it appears in the rapid movements of the-fingers, in performing several actions, and particularly in playing on a musical instru- ment. In all such rapid motions, the fingers are bent to a certain degree by the long muscles that lie upon the fore-arm, to the tendons of which a set of smaller muscles are attached, called lumbricales. These last are unable to produce any effect on the fingers, till elongated in consequence of the action of the long muscles in bending the other joints; the lumbricales then become capable of bending the fingers a little more, and of acting with great rapidity. It is a curious circumstance, that a similar application of muscles should be employed to fit the fingers to produce a quick succession of sounds, and to enable the ear to be impressed by them. From the explanation given of the adjustment of the mem- brana tympani, the difference between a musical ear and one which is too imperfect to distinguish the different notes in music, will appear to arise entirely from the greater or less nicety with which the muscle of the malleus renders the membrane capable of being truly adjusted. If the tension be perfect, all the variations produced by the action of the radiated muscle will be equally correct, and the ear truly musical; but, if the first adjustment is imperfect, although the actions of the ra- diated muscle may still produce infinite variations, none of them will be correct: the effect, in this respect, will be similar to that produced by playing upon a musical instrument which is not in tune. The hearing of articulate sounds requires less nicety in the adjustment, than of inarticulate or musical ones: an ear may therefore be able to perceive the one, although it is not fitted to receive distinct perceptions from the other. on the Membrana Tympan.. 13 The nicety or correctness of a musical ear being the result of muscular action, renders it, in part, an acquirement; for, although the original formation of these muscles in some ears renders them more capable of arriving at this perfection in their action, early cultivation is still necessary for that purpose; and it is found that an ear, which upon the first trials seemed unfit to receive accurate perceptions of sounds, shall, by early and constant application, be rendered tolerably correct, but never can attain excellence. There are organs of hearing in which the parts are so nicely adjusted to one another, as to render them capable of a degree of correctness in hearing sounds which appears preternatural. Children who during their infancy are much in the society of musical performers, will be naturally induced to attend more to inarticulate sounds than articulate ones, and by these means acquire a correct ear, which, after listening for two or three years to articulate sounds only, would have been attained with more difficulty. | i This mode of adapting the ear to different sounds, appears to be one of the most beautiful applications of muscles in the body; the mechanism is so simple, and the variety of effects so great. | Several ways in which the correctness of hearing is affected by the wrong actions of the muscles of the tympanum, that appeared to be inexplicable, can be readily accounted for, now that the means by which the membrane adjusts itself are un- derstood. ‘The following are instances of this kind. CasE1. A gentleman thirty-three years of age, who possess- ed a very correct ear, so as to be capable of singing in concert, though he had never learned music, was suddenly seized with a 14 Mr. Home’s Lecture giddiness in the head, and a slight degree of numbness in the right side and arm. These feelings went off in a few hours, but on the third day returned, and for several weeks he had returns of the same sensations. It was soon discovered that he had lost his musical ear; he could neither sing a note in tune, nor in the smallest degree perceive harmony in the performance of others. For some time he himself thought he had become a little deaf, but his medical attendant was not sensible of that in conversa~ tion. Upon going into the country, he derived great benefit from exercise and sea-bathing. Twenty months after the first attack, he was capable of sing- ing a Scotch air with tolerable exactness, though he could not sing in concert. He continued to improve in his health, and in the course of two or three years completely recovered his ear for music. In this case, there appeared to be some affection of the brain, which had diminished the actions of the tensor muscles of the membrane tympani, through the medium of the nerves which regulate their actions; this gradually went off, and the muscles recovered their former action. Case 2. A young lady was seized with a frenzy which last- ed for several years. Previous to her derangement, she was incapable of singing in tune, from the want of an ear for music; but in the course of her madness she frequently, to the astonishment of her relations, sung a tune with tolerable cor- rectness. This case is the reverse of the former; and, as it arose from a directly contrary affection of the brain, may be considered as the result of an unusual degree of action in the tensor muscles, giv- ing the membrane a more correct adjustment than it had before. on the Membrana Tympani. 15 Case 3. An eminent music master, after catching cold, found a confusion of sounds in his ears. Upon strict attention, he dis- covered that the pitch of one ear was half a note lower than that of the other; and that the perception of a simple sound did not reach both ears at the same instant, but seemed as two distinct sounds, following each other in quick succession, the last being the lowest and weakest. This complaint distressed him for a long time, but he recovered from it without any medical aid. In this case, the whole defect appears to have been in the action of the radiated muscle, exerted neither with the same quickness nor force in one ear as in the other, so that the sound was half a note too low, as well as later in being impressed upon the organ. This affection of the muscle of the membrana tympani is very similar to an affection of the straight muscles of one of the eyes, producing double vision, which I have noticed in a former lecture, when treating of the wrong actions of that organ.* | In endeavouring to explain the uses of the more internal parts of the ear, considerable advantage may be derived from class- ing them in two divisions; namely, those which are formed for the purpose of receiving impressions conveyed through the me- dium of liquid or of solid substances ; and those adapted to re- ceive impressions made by the impulses of an elastic fluid, as the common air. : This can be done very correctly. Fish, which are formed to hear in water, can have only the parts belonging to the first division; while all the parts found in the ears of birds and * Vide Philosophical Transactions for the year 1797. 16 Mr. Home’s Lecture quadrupeds, that are not met with in fish, must belong to the second, In fish, the organ consists of a vestibulum and three semi- circular canals, and these are met with in all fish. In some genera there is an external opening, and substances of a hard nature are found lying loose in the vestibulum: these, how- ever, cannot be considered as essential parts of the organ, from their not being common to fish in general. Birds have the vestibulum and semicircular canals in com- mon with fish, but they have also a membrana tympani; a slender bone connecting that membrane with the vestibulum ; and an Eustachian tube. In birds, the membrana tympani is convex externally, being pushed forwards by the end of the slender bone abovementioned. In quadrupeds and man, besides the vestibulum and canals met with in fish, the membrana tympani, the bone connecting it with the vestibulum, and the Eustachian tube, found in birds, there is a cochlea. The membrana tympani is either flat or concave externally; the bony connection between it and the vestibulum is made up of several bones, supplied with muscles to move them in different directions. The parts which compose the organ of hearing in fish, must be intended for receiving impressions conveyed through water : those additional parts met with in birds, and the still greater additions which are found in the quadruped and man, must be intended by nature for rendering more perfect the impressions conveyed to the ear through the medium of the external air. Fish, from the structure of the organ, can only hear sounds which agitate the water immediately in contact with the head of the fish; so that the impulse is conveyed, without inter- on the Membrana Tympani. 17 ruption, from the liquid in which they live, to the organ of hearing. Man is capable of hearing in a similar manner to fishes, when a communication of solid parts is kept up between the sounding body and the bones of the skull: experiments of this kind must have been made by many members of this learned Society. One of the most common is, applying a watch to the fore- head, and stopping the ears, which does not prevent the ticking from being heard: the sound is still more distinct when the watch is applied to the mastoid process. Here, as the sound can neither pass through the meatus externus, nor by the Eus- tachian tube, while the mouth is kept shut, it evidently must be conducted through the bones of the skull. When the sound produced by boiling water is brought to the ear, by one end of an iron rod resting upon the side of the kettle and the other kept in contact with the teeth, the sound is con- ducted in the same way, although in this case it has by some been supposed to pass through the Eustachian tube. In this mode of hearing, the vestibulum and semicircular canals are probably the only parts of the organ which are ne- cessary to convey the impression to the expansion of the audi- tory nerve. In hearing in air, the use of the membrana tympani in man and quadrupeds has already been explained. Its office in birds is precisely the same; but as in birds this membrane has no tensor muscle to vary its adjustment, but is always kept tense by the pressure of the end of the slender bone, the scale in birds cannot descend so low as in the human ear; and the intervals in their scale will be more minute, in consequence of the slightest tremor communicated by the action of the radiated MDCCC. D 18 Mr. HomMe’s Lecture muscle to one end of the slender bone being immediately con- ducted to the internal organ; while in the human ear it has to pass from one bone to another, before it arrives at the vestibu- lum. The cochlea has been considered by all physiologists as one of the most intricate and curious parts of the ear, and on that account had a most important office assigned to it. This, how- ever, is now to be transferred to the membrana tympani; and, upon attentive consideration of the subject, it will appear im- possible for the cochlea to be of any use in modulating sounds, since the ear is only intended to convey impressions received from external bodies; hence, no impression can be communi- cated to the cochlea, which has not-been transmitted by the membrana tympani. But, if all the varieties of sound are re- peated by the membrana tympani, no modulation in the cochlea is required; and, when it is considered that the cochlea contains water, instead of air, the effect upon every part will be found to be simultaneous. That the cochlea is neither absolutely necessary to fit the organ to be impressed by sounds communicated through air, nor to render it what is termed a musical ear, is sufficiently proved by that part being wanting in birds, whose organ is par- ticularly adapted to inarticulate sounds. Some birds, particularly bulfinches, can be taught to sing various airs, although it will be always in high notes. If it should be found that birds Heat less accurately than quadrupeds, it will favour the idea that the great delicacy of structure of the cochlea, is intended to render the nerves which are spread upon it more readily impressed by weak tremors, than those in either the vestibulum or semicircular canals. on the Membrana Tympani. 19 The cochlea and semicircular canals must be considered as two of the most important parts of the ear; their peculiar forms are no doubt adapted to some essential purposes; but, what are the precise advantages derived from their particular shape, is at present unknown. There is, however, much ground to believe, that a more extensive knowledge in comparative anatomy, join- ed with future observations, may clear up this very curious and obscure part of the physiology of the organ of hearing. In the elephant, the small bones, the cochlea, and semicircu- lar canals, are larger than those in the human ear, nearly in the same proportion with the increased size of the membrana tym- pani. In that animal, there is a very remarkable peculiarity ; which is, a cellular structure occupying the upper and posterior part of the skull, inclosed between the two tables, communi- cating by a considerable aperture with the cavity of the tympa- num, and lined by a similar membrane: the cells commu- nicate freely with one another at their lower extremities, but not near the upper, forming irregular.cylinders, placed in a converging direction, towards the cavity of the tympanum. There is no middle bony septum, separating the cells of the skull belonging to one ear from those which open into the other, but a ready communication between them. On the anterior part of the skull there is also a similar cel- lular structure, only much smaller, which communicates with the nose, but is entirely separate and distinct from that which forms an appendage to the organ of hearing. That the elephant hears better than other animals, is gene- rally asserted by those who have had opportunities of making observations on the subject. As this opinion has been ad- vanced by men who had no knowledge in anatomy, and had De 20 Mr. Home’s Lecture no previous theory to bias their judgment, it is deserving of credit. The organ of hearing being now found more perfect, and formed upon a larger scale than in any other animal with which we are acquainted, considerable weight is given to this opinion. Mr. Corse, who resided many years at Tiperah, in Bengal, and paid particular attention to the manners and habits of ele- phants, concurs in the belief of their hearing being more acute than that of man. The following circumstances are mentioned by him in proof of it. A tame elephant, who was never reconciled to have a horse moving behind him, although he expressed no uneasiness if the horse was within his view, either before or on one side, could distinguish the sound of a horse’s foot at a distance, some time before any person in company heard it: this was known by his pricking up his ears, quickening his pace, and turning his head from side to side. A tame female elephant, who had a young one, was occa- sionally sent out with other elephants for food, without the young one being allowed to follow. She was not in the habit of pining after her young one, unless she heard its voice; but frequently, on the road home, when no one could distinguish any sound whatever, she pricked up her ears, and made a noise expressive of having heard the call of her young. This having occurred frequently, attracted Mr. Corsr’s notice, and made him, at the time the female elephant used these expressions, stop the party, and desire the gentlemen to listen; but they were unable to hear any thing till they had approached nearer to the place where the young one was kept. The foregoing observations, the object of which has been to os 3a on the Membrana Tympani. 21 prove that the membrana tympani of the ear has a muscular structure, have already exceeded the limits of a lecture, which prevents us from going further at present into the considera- tion of this very curious and important organ. The general analogy between the uses of its different parts and those of the organ of vision, and the similar variations of their actions when under the influence of disease, furnish materials which, on some future occasion, may be laid before this learned Society. [2s If. On the Method of determining, from the real Probabilities of Life, the Values of Contingent Reversions in which three Lives are involved in the Survivorship. By William Morgan, Esq. BRS: Read December 12, 1799. ON SURVIVORSHIPS. ‘Tue several papers which I have had the honour of communi- cating to the Royal Society, on the doctrine of contingent re- versions, contain the greater number of those cases in which three lives are concerned in the survivorship. With the view of completing this subject, I have been induced to investigate the remaining problems; and, having succeeded in the solution of them, I hope the following will not be considered as an impro- per addition to my former communications. Being anxious to render this paper as concise as possible, I have omitted to state at length the different contingencies on which the payment of the given sum depends; trusting that, from an attentive perusal of my former demonstrations, these will appear to be so plainly expressed by the several fractions in each problem, as to render a more ample description of them unnecessary. PROBLEM I. To determine the value of a given sum, payable on the death Mr. Morcan on Survivorships. 23 of A or B, should either of them be the first or second that fails, of the three lives, A, B, and C. Solution. In this case, the payment of the given sum must certainly take place on the extinction of the joint lives of A and B, inde- pendent of C, and therefore the value of the reversion will be S.2—1 . VV AB * r The fractions expressing the contingencies on which the pay- ment of S depends, in the ist year, are ——— x a’.b—m.c—d +a’.b—m.d+a'.c—d.m+tb—m.c—d.a—-a= A gh aE ° ; S aaa SSS x abc —mc.a— a’; in the ed year = ——; xa".m—n. abcr SSS SS SS SE d—e+ta”’.m—n.e+a"xd—e.n+a".ne+m—n. aber Pea aa Plea a a ae cu dn Ja" SS ———— ath tment athe S +c—d.m—na—a'+ aa! +c— aM an val bo xmcC.a—a—nc.a—a’ +a", and so on in the other years; hence the whole value is == xr—1.V—r.AB+ AB= Sf"! VY — AB, as before. Q.E.D. PROBLEM II. To determine the value of a given sum, payable on the decease of A or B, should either of them be the second or third that shall fail, of the three lives, A, B, and C. * The same symbols are uniformly retained in this, as in my last two papers on the subject, See Phil. Trans. Vol, LXXXI. page 247. 24, Mr. Morcan on Survivorships. Solution. In the 1st year, the value of the reversion will be — = into ri a Mey Sa: el ya EY Te cud. 6 ees Zz in the ed at it; will be = = into a”.m —n.d—e+a".m—n eee qs Ni 4 Ch pass f sou oe ele n €.a et tial, hm: EO ok od “a b—m.d—e.a"+c—d.m—n.a'ta.m—n.e+b—m ii SS Sh Sea —_————. - a. Cd . man a" .etc—d.m—in.a—ata'tcoc—d.n.iait : Diesen AC da! WORN + —— ; in the gd year it will be ——— intoa’”.n—o 2 al! Sole r) .e—fta'n—o. f+ 4+21—0.e—f.a pat SS ae ait —_- —_ mm *the’-od- year into S abcri * Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, page 240. 30 Mr. Morcan on Survivorsbips. Se ET aa ni e—f.o.a™ n—0.e—f.a—d +a"+a" a—o.e—f.a"tu—o.fa' 4-4 eee fa" of pn f aa wee a" =. poe ee aa". Cle hn 6 an these several fractions be expanded, they will form nineteen i heal cae “and so on in the other years. If different series, whose sum may be found = S int V— ABC — Ads oACHEC 4. AR. AK kane @.AF— AFC m d.1+APT ——7y5 2b aBCerrae. c — 1+ AP. xe If B be the oldest of the three lives, \et 7 denote the probability that B dies after C,* then will the value of S, after the extinc- tion of the life of B, be = 2 —— x = rT , and the whole value of the reversion will be = S into = x ¥V — ABC — Ee ee = sch IK BK s 2 2b ABR to" x BK | ABK + <* , AFK 4 hae aE Sa — x BT — ABT + 6 CLs a we AC—A'B! | gk.r—1. V—A* a ee If A be the oldest of the three lives, let b’, b”, b’’, Gc. be sub- PO ARG x d 6¢ Sututed for b'—'m) m — 1, n — 0, Sc. and a —'s, s— it, Ge. for a’, a”, &c. then will the value of the given sum for the 1st a—s.db' S a—s.c—d.B year be a aes x Tages ot + aris 3 for the od year — ep Be” ET, cb" — ee i sei Sea 5 Gum Gs seb abcr -- a rete) -” and so on for the other years. Hence the whole value may be found = S into — x 2V — 3A — ABC—— 3¢€ * By the Table in Phil. Trans, for the year 1794, page 229. F 2 36 Mr. Morean on Survivorships. x AK — ABK — 4-5 4 +, HC— HBC — x AT— “eae = s.1+NBT s NC—NBC —— AC— AB AB eae ear pete Seely NB pts When the lives are eee the value, a the two first rules, will be = = se x2V + —— CKK + —— — x CT — CCT — = _.ECTT: and by the third rule it will be = S into — x2V—3 3 3C—cec — —— x CKK 4+ —— x CT 4+ —— aS Cer ata air om a x1-+CTT. In both cases, all the fractions after the Suen first destroy each other, so that the general rule is = = 2V — 3C — CCC, which may be proved, from other principles, to be the true value. As the reversion, in this problem, consists of two parts; 1st, of the contingency of receiving the given sum on the death of A, provided B should be then dead and C living; and edly, of the contingency of receiving it on the death of A, provided B should be the first, C the second, and A the third, that fails, it follows, that the present solution may be obtained from those of the problem in my second Paper,* and of the 6th problem + in my last Paper on this subject. But the computations derived from the addition of those two problems would be too tedious and complicated, and therefore the preceding rules are pre- ferable. In the particular case of the equality of the lives, the general rule becomes the same as above, (or = S x = x * Phil. Trans. Vol. LXXIX. page 41. + Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, page 253. Mr. Morcan on Survivorships. 37 2V—3C—CCC) and consequently affords an additional proof of the truth of the investigation of the three problems. PROBLEM VI. To determine the value of a given sum, payable on the death of A, should his life be the first or last that shall fail, of the three lives; and should B’s life, if it fail, become extinct before the life of C. Solution. The value of the given sum, in the 1st year, is — i. into abcr _b=m. a AE 2 od: ; in the ed year, m—nN .€ + ; in the gd year, ——- aor et Pita : ° S 6 a’.m—n.d—e y) its value is = = aa TAtO Tt (fe D b—m .d—e.a" fe ten 2 abcrs alt 3 ais ae ei Th Fea = es into ~n ariel a'tofish Lote a".n SEU NE WoT a Wes nN e—f. a! 2 bon .¢—e - ——— uae ¢-«" ,and so on in the other years. The sum of these several fractions, after reducing them into their proper series, pense Wiis ieee AS A ABC += 4 | sree eit APL PL AAL 4B 1 = ABL = — ae % Brie. Ae HO Are: When B is the oldest of the three lives, let x be the difference between his age and that of the oldest person in the table; and, 2er 2bc as the given sum may be received after the necessary extinction of his life, either on the event of C’s having died after him in x 38 Mr. Morcan on Survivorships. years, and A’s dying in the zr + 1, x + 2, &c. years, or on the event of C’s having lived x years, and A’s dying in the Flee Zee &c. years, it is obvious that the preceding rule in this case will not express the whole value of the reversion. Retaining the same symbols as in the first case of Prob. V. the value, depending on the former of those two events will be =S~x aaa , and on the latter of them it will be = AC* Es Pq: PL ,\ ee epg rts VAG AC*. zr. SF x AT 1 ae ee — a ee therefore, the whole value of the reversion will be = S into ce - AB md ——_— -e sea APES a eae HH wash aAkil— oe en pq.r—t .VIACe tat VE + BC Ar Or z2acr?+1 area When Cis the oldest of the three lives, let @ scar the proba- bility that C dies after B;* and let z be the difference between the age of C and that of the oldest person in the table; A’, A’B’, and A’F’, the values of annuities on those single and joint lives for z years; and q the number of persons living at the age of A after zx years; then will the value in this case be = S sr t=). V— A’ ABC + = — 54 4.7 PAPT — zr = pote DUBE es xi AT a ee + 2nFEFC Src @q.7—t . V—A*= — AFC + Prem When A is the oldest of the three lives, let the symbols be changed in like manner as in the corresponding case in the * Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, page 229. Mr. Morean on Survivorships. 39 preceding problem; then will the value for the 1st year be : FERS a Te? into Ah GE 5 pep ope bes ab ly abcr ed Boe or. re es a on for the ed year = —-—— into z é — St Sai .eb" | 5at.dae.b—0 4b" , Sat. dae.B Se en a ie ees ee re Cee 66 ee - y, and so on for the gd, 4th, and remaining years. These several fractions may be expanded into twelve different a VA ARC : : fs series, whose sum may be found = §S into = r AC Raa 2AB x. AK a .HBC d GAIA AID a Ss Tn vere aa, Teer ABT x1 4+ NC + NB— NBC— —*_x 14 NBT. If the lives be equal, the value, by the first two rules, will be Pe NCCC CCC dd a d SSS a So x1+ CTT — eras 7-60) =o == + —— x 2CK — CCK; and by =S into the third rule it will be = S into =1Y=C Fh CCU +—. zr ZC d 2cr CCK — CK + ——x1 + CT—-** x TF CIT. In both cases, all the fractions after the first destroy each other; so that the general rule becomes = me x V—C+4 CC — CCC, 2r which may be-proved to be the true value, from other principles. The solution of this problem might have been derived from that of the first problem* in my third Paper, and from that of the 6th problem+ in my last Paper on this subject, “ by finding “ the value on the death of A, should his life be the first that * Phil. Trans. Vol. LXXXI. page 248. + Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, page 253. 40 Mr. Morcan on Survivorsbips. “ failed; and also the value of the same sum, should B be the ‘“‘ first, C the second, and A the third, that failed:” but the foregoing rules, in being more simple, are preferable. In the particular case of the equality of the three lives, the value, by these problems, will be = S into ri x V— CCC + {Vo aC 4 aC, CCCs", ¥_ oe as before. Q. E. D. PROBLEM VII. - To determine the value of a given sum, payable on the death of A, B, and C, provided C shall die after one life in parti- cular, (A). Solution. In the ist year, the value of the given sum will be = xb—m.c—d.a’; inthe ed year, it will pee ee aber Se 2abcr * m—n.d—e.a" Ty qt ey eee ee a ene eR TS int 0 td a ee = bem e aid! = 2 MEO epee” é ° a —s ee d—e.a'+ = ; in the gd year = —— into = Fy So a ae ae aE ee ee +b—n.e—f.a'ta"+ = +n —o.e—f.a‘ta bene fra’ : Seay and soon in the other years; whence the whole value may at last be found = S into x BC— B— TATION. BC AB BBC “Se aor BK — ABK -+ R, (R denoting the value of S, by the 3d problem d APT +o x1 +AP— OH — = x c z2C¢ Mr. Morean on Survivorsbips. 41 in my first Paper, on the contingency of C’s dying after A).* This general rule gives the true value of the reversion, when B is the oldest of the three lives. But, when C is the oldest of the three lives, the general rule will be = S into x BC— B’ —— , BC_ AB mm o———, Od TH APT Rae epne st! elon tye a _ x 2r BCL. BE = BG ie een fps Fa a a se, ONT. denoting the difference between the ages of C and of the oldest person in the table; p the number of persons living at the age of B after x years; B’, A’B’; and A’P’, the values of annuities on those single and joint lives for x years; and » the probability that C dies after A. When A is the oldest of the three lives, let the symbols be changed as in the solution of the. vlc ae waa and the whole value of the given sum will be= —- x —— + — cola = Z , Se. 5 - “on r. os 7 Siig r3 ? Se. + a> be ama 6. 0Ee 7 S: db' ev S be = ber eh. — eb > Ff. oye" be za Fa LE +; Ge. — scb’ ae sue S dtb' eu. Bb! sre SHH +, Se. x a Te 2abcr r 7 ah Se eh thf seb Se. pe EF 73 » Be. + x T + i ear 2ab era = +, Be. + x Boba he eet ted’ ps hie v4 wise olds te. mu Rea tear ic eazalen Se +, Be. 00. * Phil. Trans. Vol. LXXVIII. page 347. + Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, table in page 229. MDCCC. 42 Mr. Morean on ‘Survivorships. After the extinction of A’s life, the given sum may be received on either of three events; 1st. on the death of Bin the z+ 1, z + 2, Bc. years, (x denoting the difference between the ages of A and of the oldest person in the table,) C having died after A in the first 2 years; edly, on the death of C in the eS ae 242, &c. years, B having died in the first x years; gdly, on the extinction of both the lives of B and C after the first z years. Let @ denote the probability that C dies after A in z years ;* p the number of persons living opposite the age of B; and k the same number opposite the age of C at the end of z years ; and the value on the two first of these contingencies will bad ODP) r—1.V—B* S.b—p.k.r—1.V—C* be Sor pep +r born greek letters be substituted for the corresponding ztalic letters in the first a and the value on the third of those contingencies Again, let a g" —_ S pee E Bb" will be = oe x S44 + » Be. = pate eer (4c S oR E ieee S ‘ St a Sc. + Sie Se » Se. =~ 7 ee 2B €.3'+6" . : ra S Sbmeraee tie &c. The 1st of these series being added to the first series in the former part of the solution, their sum will be = S into ae — ue eer ; the ed and 4th being added to the 4th * 5th, their sum will be = — S 4.C2SBG; and the 3d series being added to the gd series in that part of the solution, their sum will be ee, so that these six series S.7=1-C—BC last mentioned are = — SFr af: ‘The whole Wate of tour ¢ Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, table in page 229. + The solution of the latter part of the case in the 6th problem, in which B is the Mr. Morcan on Survivorships. 43 the reversion in this’ case may therefore be found = S . into fot V B= 90 -p 2BC + AC + ABC + SS 4 Za x HB + HC — HBC —— x BK’ AK — ABK f o+ix ——— ae ce a aa B’C’, and B’K’, denoting the values of annuities on those ‘joint lives for z years. When the three lives are ih equal age, the value picked the first two malas will b “ox rp CF ew ee ‘CCK, in which the last three fractions destroy each other; and by the x V—3C + 3CC—CCC; _ that is,.in both cases, «« half the reversion after the extinction of “ the three lives,” which from self-evident principles is known to be the true value. _ The solution of this problem may also be derived from those of the 3d problem in my first Paper,* and of the 1st problem in my last Paper, «« by deducting the value of an estate after the. “«‘ death of C, provided that should happen after the death of A, “ from the value of an annuity on the life of B after C, pro- «< vided C. should die before A.’ Thus, in the case of equal lives, the value by the first of these problems being ——— ae sons : > 2ccr Sex last rule the value will be = and the value by the second being = ——. = concer their V—3C+3CC—CCC z difference, or , 1s the number of years pur- eldest of the three lives, has. been investigated much in the same manner with the pre- sent case; but the operation was omitted merely for the sake of conciseness. * Phil, Trans. Vol. LXXVIII. page-347. + Phil. Trans, for the year 1794, page 235, Go AA Mr. Morcan on Survivorships. chase tn: and consequently the value of a given sum is 3C + 3CC — CCC, as before.. But the rules derived yi the foregoing solution are in general more simple than those derived from the two problems just mentioned, and are therefore to be preferred to them. The foregoing problems, together with those which have been investigated in my former papers, comprehend, as far as I can perceive, all the different cases of survivorship between three lives. The great number of contingencies on which these reversions depend, must necessarily render the solutions intri- cate, and consequently the general rules complicated and la- borious. It would not, however, be a difficult task to abridge these rules very considerably, without destroying their accuracy in any great degree; but this would be foreign to my purpose in these papers, which has uniformly been confined to the inves- tigation of the correct values of the different reversions. Nor do I think that such an abridgement is necessary, as the opera- tions of even the longest of the present rules, may be completed in very nearly as short a time as the inaccurate approximations which have hitherto been employed for the same purpose. It may not be improper to observe, that the solutions in these papers are not only the first which have ever been deduced, in the case of two and three lives, from just principles and the real probabilities of life; but that, as to many of the problems, not even an attempt has ever been made to approximate to the value of the reversion. Being now possessed of correct solutions of all the cases in which two and three lives are involved in the survivorship, we are possessed of all that is really useful, and therefore I feel the Mr. Morean on Survivorships. | 4S greater satisfaction in closing my inquiries on this subject. For, in regard to contingencies depending on four or more lives, the cases are not only much too numerous and intricate to admit of a solution, but they occur so seldom in practice, as to render the entire investigation of them, were it even possible, a matter of little or no importance. In my last Paper, printed in the Phil. Trans. for the year 1794, page 257, last line but one, fer BEL s read el Pha GEC™ ‘whence the general rule in the i 2ber®+s : _ = BC AC B foll b = Sinton ye Vea ABC tp 2 EL ollowing page becomes — S$ into ETS V—3 ABC + = oo =a % AF—AFC a. HFC co Pi z.HB—HBC He NB-ONEC 3 3a 2a 3 + = Gar - vf + m.1+NPC m = 2.AP—APC p k.r—t.V—C* 5 br F + oi we b cr=+1 pk.r—1.V—BC* 2bcr™+4 1 C 46) INI. Abstract of a Register of the Barometer, Thermometer, and Rain, at Lyndon, ia Rutland, for the Year 1798. By Thomas Barker, Esq. Read December 12, 1799. Barometer. Thermometer. In the House. Abroad. .|Lowest.| Mean, |High.| Low.|Mean.|High,| Low.|Mean. Inches. | Inches. 28,47 Inches. 1,028 28,70 1,542 28,71 0,532 28,66 1,323 28,75 1,892 29511 - 950 |. 28,91 q' 2,942 29525 28,48 1,942 2,814 28,70 33030 28,21 2,546 6 28,80 1,396 Mr. BarKer’s Register, &c. 47 The year began open and mild, and drier than it had been at the end of last year. There was near a week’s frost about January the 10th; again about February the 6th; and the sharpest this winter was about the 18th, but none of them lasted a week. It was in general an open, mild, and pleasant winter, and drying, except one great rain and flood, February 23. The NE winds in the middle and latter end of March delayed the grass, but the season was in general caim. It was a fine April, chiefly dry, though with some fine rains at times, and not without some storms. A fruitful season, though in some mea- sure hindered by frequent frosty mornings, for the first three weeks of April: this brought the grain on finely ; and the low meadows, which were so thoroughly soaked by the wet last winter, had great crops of grass; but the late laid uplands were thin. I think it was upon the whole one of the finest summers I have known; a great deal of calm, sunny, and fine weather, and moderately hot. The wet of the winter prevented the ground from burning till the middle of the summer: then a wet middle of July set the grass growing again; but, as rain was wanted, it was not complained of, though in hay-time; for it rather hindered than damaged the hay, which was for the most part pretty well got, though rather troublesome, and the wet made plenty of turnips, and fine eddishes. The harvest was in general well got, with good crops of white corn; but the weather had been full dry for the beans and peas, which were thin, though pretty well corned; and the harvest was early, for it was almost finished in August’ The fine harvest made the ground begin to burn again in September; but that - was soon stopped, by a great and windy rain before the end of 48 Mr. BarxeEr’s Register, &e. the month. The autumn was fine, with few frosty mornings ; yet one or two severe nights in October, before the green-house plants were housed, killed many of them, especially the Gera- niums: but it was afterwards warm and wet again, and conti- nued pretty fine, for the season, till the middle of December, when, after some misty weather, followed by very severe frost in the last week, it was exceedingly cold, and the thermometer was one day down at 51, which I never saw it at but once before; and the frost continued, though not so severe, till near the middle of January, 1799. | [494 1V. On the Power of penetrating into.Space by Telescopes ; with a comparative Determination of the Extent of that Power in natural Viston, and in Telescopes of various Sizes and Con- structions; illustrated by select Observations. By William Herschel, LL.D. F. B.S. Read November 21, 1799. T+ will not be difficult to shew that the power of penetrating into space by telescopes is very different from magnifying power, and that, in the construction of instruments, these two powers ought to be considered separately. In order te conduct our present inquiry properly, it will be necessary to examine the nature of luminous bodies, and to — enter into the method of vision at a distance. Therefore, to prevent the inaccuracy that would unavoidably arise from the use of terms in their common acceptation, I shall have recourse to algebraic symbols, and to such definitions as may be necessary to fix a precise meaning to some expressions which are often used in conversation, without much regard to accuracy. By luminous bodies I mean, in the following pages, to denote such as throw out light, whatever may be the cause of it: even those that are opaque, when they are in a situation to reflect light, should be understood to be included; as objects of vision they must throw out light, and become intitled to be called luminous. However, those that shine by their own light may MDCCC. H ‘ Oe 50 Dr. HERSCHEL on the Power of be called self-luminous, when there is an occasion to distinguish them. The question will arise, whether luminous bodies scatter light in all directions equally; but, till we are more intimately acquainted with the powers which emit and reflect light, we shall probably remain ignorant on this head. I should remark, that what I mean to say, relates only to the physical points into which we may conceive the surfaces of luminous bodies to be divided; for, when we take any given luminous body in its whole construction, such as the sun or the moon, the question will assume another form, as will appear hereafter. That light, flame, and luminous gases are penetrable to the rays of light, we know from experience;* it follows therefore, that every part of the sun’s disk cannot appear equally lumi- nous to an observer in a given situation, on account of the unequal depth of its luminous atmosphere in different places.+ This regards only bodies that are self-luminous. But the greatest inequalities in the brightness of luminous bodies in general, will undoubtedly be owing to their natural texture ; * In order to put this to a proof, I placed four candles behind a screen, at 3 of an inch distance from each other, so that their flames might range exactly in a line. The first of the candles was placed at the same distance from the screen, and just opposite a narrow slit, 3 of an inch long, and 3 broad, On the other side of the screen I fixed up a book, at such a distance from the slit that, when the first of the candles was lighted, the letters might not be sufficiently illuminated to become legible. Then, lighting successively the second, third, and fourth candles, I found the letters gradually more- illuminated, so that at last I could read them with great facility; and, by the arrange- ment of the screen and candles, the light of the second, third, and fourth, could not seach the book, without penetrating the flames of those that were placed before them. + See the Paper on the Nature and Construction of the Sun. Phil. Trans. for 1795. page 46, penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 51 which may be extremely various, with regard to their power of throwing out light more or less copiously. - Brightness, I ascribe to bodies that throw out light ; and those that throw out most are the brightest. It will now be necessary to establish certain expressions for brightness in different circumstances. In the first place, let us suppose a luminous surface throwing out light, and let the whole quantity of light thrown out by it be called L. Now, since every part of this surface throws out light, let us suppose it divided into a number of luminous physical points, denoted by N. If the copiousness of the emission of light from every phy- sical point of the luminous surface were equal, it might in general be denoted by c; but, as that is most probably never the case, I make C stand for the mean copiousness of light thrown out from all the physical points of a luminous object. This may be found in the following manner. Let c express the copiousness of emitting light, of any number of physical points that agree in this respect; and let the number of these points be n. Let the copiousness of emission of another number of points be c’, and their number n’. And if, in the same manner, other degrees of copiousness be called c’, c*, &c. and their numbers be denoted by n’, 1’, Sc. then will the sum of every set of points, multiplied by their respective copiousness of emitting light, give ‘us the quantity of light thrown out by the whole luminous body. That is, L==cn+c'n’ +n’, &c.; and the mean copiousness of emitting light, of each physical point, will be expressed by cntow+e n®, Ge. Lay ae : Ff 2 52 Dr. Herscuen on the Power of ° It is evident that the mean power, or copiousness of throwing out light, of every physical point in the luminous surface, mul- tiplied by the number of points, must give us the whole power of throwing out light, of the luminous body. That is CN = L. I ought now to answeran objection that may be made to this theory. Light, as has been stated, is transparent; and, since the light of a point behind-the surface of a flame will pass through the surface, ought we not to take in its depth, as well as its superficial dimensions? In answer to this, I recur to what has been said with regard to the different powers of throwing out light, of the points of a luminous surface. For, as light must be finally emitted through the surface, it is but referring all light arising from the emission of points behind the surface, to the surface itself, and the account of emitted light will be equally true. And this will also explain why it has been stated as probable, that different parts of the same luminous surface may throw out different quantities of light. Since, therefore, the quantity of light thrown out by any lu- minous body is truly represented by CN, and that an object is . bright in consequence of light thrown out, we may say that brightness is truly defined by CN. If however, there should at any time be occasion for distinction, the brightness arising from the great value of C, may be called the intrinsic bright- ness ; and that arising from the great value of N, the aggregate brightness; but the absolute brightness, in all cases, will still be defined by CN. Hitherto we have only considered luminous objects, and their condition with regard to throwing out light. We proceed now to find an expression for their appearance at any assigned dis- tance; and here it will be proper to leave out of the account, penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 53 every part of CN which is not applied for the purpose of vision. L representing the whole quantity of light thrown out by CN, we shall denote that part of it which is used in vision, either by the eye or by the telescope, /. This will render the conclusions that may be drawn hereafter more unexceptionable; for, the quantity of light / being scattered over 4 small space in propor- tion to L, it may reasonably be looked upon as more uniform in its texture; and no scruples about its inequality will take | place. The equation of light, in this present sense, therefore, is CNV. Now, since we know that the density of light decreases in’ the ratio of the squares of the distances of the luminous objects, the expression for its quantity at the distance of the observer BB od D, will be —-- In natural vision, the quantity / undergoes a considerable change, by the opening and contracting of the pupil of the eye. If we call the aperture of the iris a, we find that in different persons it differs considerably. Its changes are not easily to be ascertained; but we shall not be much out in stating its varia- tions to be chiefly between 1 and 2 tenths of an inch. Perhaps this may be supposed under-rated; for the powers of vision, in a room completely darkened, will exert themselves in a very extraordinary manner. In some experiments on light, made at Bath, in the year 1780, I have often remarked, that after staying some time in a room fitted up for these experiments, where on entering I could not perceive any one object, I was no longer at a loss, in half an hour’s time, to find every thing I wanted. It is however probable that the opening of the iris is not the only cause of seeing better after remaining long in the dark; but 5A Dr. HerscueEx on the Power of that the tranquillity of the retina, which is not disturbed by foreign objects of vision, may render it fit to receive impressions such as otherwise would have been too faint to be perceived. This seems to be supported by telescopic vision; for it has often happened to me, in a fine winter’s evening, when, at midnight, and in the absence of the moon, I have taken sweeps of the hea- vens, of four, five, or six hours duration, that the sensibility of the eye, in consequence of the exclusion of light from surround- ing objects, by means of a black hood which I wear upon these occasions, has been very great; and it is evident, that the open- ing of the iris would have been of no service in these cases, on account of the diameter of the optic pencil, which, in the 20 feet telescope, at the time of sweeping, was no more than ,12 inch. The effect of this increased sensibility was such, that if a star of the 3d magnitude came towards the field of view, I found it necessary to withdraw the eye before its entrance, in order not to injure the delicacy of vision acquired by long continuance in the dark. The transit of large stars, unless where none of the 6th or 7th magnitude could be had, have generally been declined in my sweeps, even with the 20 feet telescope. And I remem- ber, that after a considerable sweep with the 40 feet instrument, the appearance of Sirius announced itself, at a great distance, like the dawn of the morning, and came on by degrees, increas- ing in brightness, till this brilliant star at last entered the field of view of the telescope, with all the splendour of the rising sun, and forced me to take the eye from that beautiful sight. Such striking effects are a sufficient proof of the great sensibility of the eye, acquired by keeping it from the light. On taking notice, in the beginning of sweeps, of the time that passed, I found that the eye, coming from the light, required penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 55 near 20’, before it could be sufficiently reposed to admit a view of very delicate objects in the telescope; and that the observa- tion of a transit of a star of the 2d or 3d magnitude, would disorder the eye again, so as to require nearly the same time for the re-establishment of its tranquillity. The difficulty of ascertaining the greatest opening of the eye, arises from the impossibility of measuring it at the time of its extreme dilatation, which can only happen when every thing is completely dark; but, if the variation of a is not easily to be ascertained, we have, on the other hand, no difficulty to deter- mine the quantity of light admitted through a telescope, which must depend upon the diameter of the object-glass, or mirror ; for, its aperture 4 may at all times be had by measurement. av Di accurate for the quantity of light admitted by the eye; and that Atl De remembered, that the aperture of the eye is also concerned in viewing with telescopes ; and that, consequently, whenever the pencil of light transmitted to the eye by optical instruments exceeds the aperture of the pupil, much light must be lost. In that case, the expression 4*/ will fail; and therefore, in gene- It follows, therefore, that the expression will always be will be sufficiently so for the telescope. For it must be ral, if m be the magnifying power, = ought not to exceed a. As I have defined the brightness of an object to the eye of a -' it will be a D necessary to answer some objections that may be made to this theory. Optical writers have proved, that an object is equally bright at all distances. It may, therefore, be maintained against ~ me, that since a wall illuminated by the sun will appear equally an observer at a distance, to be expressed by 56 Dr. HERSCHEL on the Power of bright, at whatsoever distance the observer be placed that views it, the sun also, at the distance of Saturn, or still farther from us, must be as bright as it isin its present situation. Nay, it may be urged, that in a telescope, the different distance of stars can be of no accoynt with regard to their brightness, and that we must consequently be able to see stars which are many thousands of times farther than Sirius from us; in short, that a star must be infinitely distant not to be seen any longer. Now, objections such as these, which seem to be the imme- diate consequence of what has been demonstrated by mathema- ticians, and which yet apparently contradict what I assert in this paper, deserve to be thoroughly answered. It may be remembered, that I have distinguished brightness into three different sorts.* Two of these, which have been dis- criminated by intrinsic and absolute brightness, are, in common language, left without distinction. In order to shew that they are so, I might bring a variety of examples from common con- versation; but, taking this for granted, it may be shewn that all the objections I have brought against my theory have their foundation in this ambiguity. The demonstrations of opticians, with regard to what I call intrinsic brightness, will not oppose what I affirm of absolute brightness ; and I shall have nothing farther to do than to shew that what mathematicians have said, must be understood to refer entirely to the intrinsic brightness, or illumination of the picture of objects on the retina of the eye: from which it will clearly follow, that their doctrine and mine are perfectly recon- cileable ; and that they can be at variance only when the am- biguity of the word brightness is overlooked, and objections, * See page 52. penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 57 such as I have made, are raised, where the word brightness is used as absolute, when we should have kept it to the only meaning it can bear in the mathematicians’ theorem. The first objection I have mentioned is, that the sun, to an observer on Saturn, must be as bright as it is here on earth. Now by this cannot be meant, that an inhabitant standing on the planet Saturn, and looking at the sun, should absolutely receive as much light from it as one on earth receives when he sees it; for this would be contrary to the well known decrease of light at various distances. The objection, therefore, can only go to assert, that the picture of the sun, on the retina of the Saturnian observer, is as intensely illuminated as that on the retina of the terrestrial astronomer. ‘To this I perfectly agree. But let those who would go farther, and say that therefore the sun is absolutely as bright to the one as to the other, remember that the sun on Saturn appears to be a hundred times less than on the earth; and that consequently, though it may there be intrinsically as bright, it must here be absolutely* an hundred times brighter. The next objection I have to consider, relates to the fixed stars. What has been shewn in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the sun, is so intirely applicable to the stars, that it will be very easy to place this point also in its proper light. As I have assented to the demonstration of opticians with regard to the brightness of the sun, when seen at the distance of Saturn, provided the meaning of this word be kept to the intrinsic illu- mination of the picture on the retina of an observer, I can have no hesitation to allow that the same will hold good with a star placed at any assignable distance. But I must repeat, that * See the definition of absolute brightness, page 52. MDCCC. I 58 Dr. Herscuex on the Power of the light we can receive from stars is truly expressed by Xi and that therefore their absolute brightness must vary in the inverse ratio of the squares of their distances. Hence I am authorised to conclude, and observation abundantly confirms it, that stars cannot be seen by the naked eye, when they are more than seven or eight times farther from us than Sirius; and that. they become, comparatively speaking, very soon invisible with our best instruments. It will be shewn hereafter, that the visi- bility of stars depends on the penetrating power. of telescopes, which, I must repeat, falls indeed very short of shewing stars that are many thousands of times farther from us than Sirius ; much less can we ever hope to see stars that are all but infi- nitely distant. If now it be admitted that the expressions we have laid down are such as agree with well known facts, we may proceed to vision at a distance ; and first with respect to the naked eye. Here the power of penetrating into space, is not only con- fined by nature, but is moreover occasionally limited by the failure in brightness of luminous objects. Let us see whether astronomical observations, assisted by mathematical reasoning, can give us some idea of the general extent of natural vision. Among the reflecting luminous objects, our penetrating powers are sufficiently ascertained. From the moon we may step to Venus, to Mercury, to Mars, to J upiter, to Saturn, and last of all to the Georgian planet. An object seen by reflected light at a greater distance than this, it has never been allowed us to perceive; and it is indeed much to be admired, that we should penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 59 see borrowed illumination to the amazing distance of more than 18 hundred millions of miles; especially when that light, in coming from the sun to the planet, has to pass through an equal space, before it can be reflected, whereby it must be so en- feebled as to be above 368 times less intense on that planet than it is with us, and when probably not more than one-third part of that light can be thrown back from its disk.* Theerange of natural vision with self-luminous objects, is incomparably more extended, but less accurately to be ascer- tained. From ovr brightest luminary, the sun, we pass imme- diately to very distant objects; for, Sirius, Arcturus, and the rest of the stars of the first magnitude, are probably those that come next; and what their distance may be, it is well known, can only be calculated imperfectly from the doctrine of paral- laxes, which places the nearest of them at least 4125930 times farther from us than the sun. In order to take a second step forwards, we must enter into some preliminary considerations, which cannot but be attended with considerable uncertainty. The general supposition, that stars, at least those which seem to be promiscuously scattered, are probably one with another of a certain magnitude, being admitted, it has already been shewn in a former Paper, + that after a certain number of stars of the first magnitude have been arranged about the sun, a farther distant set will come in for the second place. ‘The situation of these may be taken to be, one with another, at about double the distance of the former from us. * According to Mr. Boucvenr, the surface of the moon absorbs about two-thirds of the light it receives from the sun. See Traite d’Optique, page 122. + Phil. Trans. for the year 1796, page 166, 167, 168. | Ig 60 Dr. Herscuer on the Power of By directing our view to them, and thus penetrating one step farther into space, these stars of the second magnitude furnish us with an experiment that shews what phaznomena will take place, when we receive the illumination of two very remote objects, equally bright in themselves, whereof one is at double the dis- tance of the other. The expression for the brightness of such objects, at all distances, and with any aperture of the iris, al D? of reducing this to an experimental investigation will be as ; and a ‘method according to our foregoing notation, will be follows. Let us admit that‘az Cygni, 6 Tauri, and others, are stars of the second magnitude, such as are here to be considered. We know, that in looking at them and the former, the aperture of the iris will probably undergo no change; since the difference in brightness, between Sirius, Arcturus, « Cygni, and @ Tauri, does not seem to affect the eye so as to require any alte- ration in the dimensions of the iris; a, therefore becomes a given quantity, and may be left out. Admitting also, that the latter of these stars are probably at double the distance of the former, we have D* in one case four times that of the other; and the two expressions for the brightness of the stars, will be / for those of the first magnitude, and 4/ for those of the second. The quantities being thus prepared, what I mean to suggest by an experiment is, that since sensations, by their nature, will not admit of being halved or quartered, we come thus to know by inspection what phenomenon will be produced by the fourth part of the light of a star of the first magnitude. In this sense, I think we must take it for granted, that a certain idea of bright- ness, attached to the stars which are generally denominated to penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 61 be of the second magnitude, may be added to our experimental knowledge; for, by this means, we are informed what we are to understand by the expressions cs, = — We cannot wonder at the immense difference between the bright- -ness of the.sun and that of Sirius; since the two first expres- sions, when properly resolved, give us a ratio of brightness of more than 170 thousand millions to one; whereas the two latter, as has been shewn, give only a ratio of four to one. What has been said will carry us, with very little addition, to the end of our unassisted power of vision to penetrate into space. We can have no other guide to lead us a third step than the same beforementioned hypothesis; in consequence of which, however, it must be acknowledged to be sufficiently probable, that the stars of the third magnitude may be placed about three times as far from us as those of the first. It has been seen, by my remarks on the comparative brightness of the stars, that I place no reliance on the classification of them into magnitudes;-+ but, in the present instance, where the question is not to ascer- tain the precise brightness of any one star, it is quite sufficient to know that the number of the stars of the first three different magnitudes, or different brightnesses, answers, ina general way, sufficiently well to a supposed equally distant arrangement of a first, second, and third set of stars about the sun. Our third step forwards into space, may therefore very properly be said to fall on the pole-star, on y Cygni, ¢ Bootis, and all those of the same order. * The names of the objects ©, Sirius, @ Tauri, are here used to express their dis- tance from us. + Phil, Trans. for the year 1796, page 168, 169. 62 Dr. HerscuEx on the Power of As the difference, between these and the stars of the preceding order, is much less striking than that between the stars of the first and second magnitude, we also find that the expressions a*l aad ; 3 . Phan? and aoe ae not in the high ratio of 4 to 1, but only as 9 to 4, or 22 to 1. | Without tracing the brightness of the stars through any farther steps, I shall only remark, that the diminution of the ratios of brightness of the stars of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th magnitude, seems to answer to their mathematical expressions, as well as, from the first steps we have taken, can possibly be imagined. The calculated ratio, for instance, of the brightness of a star of the 6th magnitude, to that of one of the 7th, is but little more than 12. to 1; but still we find by experience, that the eye can very conveniently perceive it. At the same time, the faintness of the stars of the 7th magnitude, which require the finest nights, and the best common eyes to be perceived, gives us little room to believe that we can penetrate much farther into space, with objects of no greater brightness than stars. But, since it may be justly observed, that in the foregoing estimation of the proportional distance of the stars, a consider- able uncertainty must remain, we ought to make a proper allowance for it; and, in order to see to what extent this should go, we must make use of the experimental sensations of the ratios of brightness we have now acquired, in going step by step forward: for, numerical ratios of brightness, and sensa= tions of them, as has been noticed before, are very different things. And since, from the foregoing considerations, it may be concluded, that as far as the 6th, 7th, or 8th magnitude, there penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 63 ought to be a visible: general difference between stars of one order and that of the next following, I think, from the faintness of the stars of the 7th magnitude, we are authorized to conclude, that no star, eight, nine, or at most ten times as far from us as Sirius, can possibly be perceived by the natural eye. The boundaries of vision, however, are not confined to single stars. Where the light of these falls short, the united lustre of sidereal systems will still be perceived. In clear nights, for instance, we may see a whitish patch in the sword-handle of Perseus,* which contains small stars of various sizes, as may be ascertained by a telescope of a moderate power of penetrating into space. We easily see the united lustre of them, though the light of no one of the single stars could have affected the unas- sisted eye. Considerably beyond the distance of the former must be the cluster discovered by Mr. MesstzEr, in 1764; north following H Geminorum. It contains stars much smaller than those of the former cluster ; and a telescope should have a considerable penetrating power, to ascertain their brightness properly, such as my common 1o-feet reflector. The night should be clear, in order to see it well with the naked eye, and it will then appear in the shape of a small nebula. Still farther from us must be the nebula between 4 and & Herculis, discovered by Dr. HALLEy, in 1714. The stars of it are so small that it has been called a Nebula;-f and has been regarded as such, till my instruments of high penetrating * See the catalogue of a second thousand of new nebulz and clusters of stars, VI. 33» 34- Phil. Trans. Vol. LXXIX. page 251. + In the Connoissance des Temps for 1783, No. 13, it is described as a nebula without stars, 64,” Dr. HERscueL on the Power of powers were applied to it. It requires a very clear night, and the absence of the moon, to see it with the natural eye. Perhaps, among the farthest objects that can make an im- pression on the eye, when not assisted by telescopes, may be reckoned the nebula in the girdle of Andromeda, discovered by Simon Marius, in 1612. It is however not difficult to per- ceive it, in a clear night, on account of its great extent, rom the powers of penetrating into space by natural vision, we proceed now to that of telescopes. It has been shewn, that brightness, or light, is to the naked eye truly represented by a; in a telescope, therefore, the light admitted will be expressed by = Hence it would fol- low, that the artificial power of penetrating into space should be to the natural one as 4 to a. But this proportion must be cor- rected by the practical deficiency in light reflected by mirrors, or transmitted through glasses; and it will in a great measure depend on the circumstances of the workmanship, materials, and construction of the telescope, how much loss of light there will be sustained. In order to come to some determination on this subject, I made many experiments with plain mirrors, polished like my large ones, and of the same composition of metal. The method I pursued was that proposed by Mr. Boucurer, in his Traité d’Optique, page 16, fig. 3.; but I brought the mirror, during the trial, as close to the line connecting the two objects as pos- sible, in order to render the reflected rays nearly perpendicular. The result was, that out of 100 thousand incident rays, penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 65 67262 were returned ; and therefore, if a double reflection takes place, only 45242 will be returned. Before this light can reach the eye, it will suffer some loss in passing through the eye glass; and the amount of this I ascer- tained, by taking a highly polished plain glass, of nearly the usual thickness of optical glasses of small focal lengths. Then, by the method of the same author, page 21, fig. 5. 1 found, that out of 100 thousand incident rays, 94825 were transmitted through the glass. Hence, if two lenses be used, 89918; and, with three lenses, 85265 rays will be transmitted to the eye. Then, by compounding, we shall have, in a telescope of my construction with one reflection, 63796 rays, out of 100 thou- sand, come to the eye. In the Newronran form, with a single eye lens, 42901; and, with a double eye glass 40681 will re- main for vision. There must always remain a considerable uncertainty in the quantities here assigned; as a newly polished mirror, or one in high preservation, will give more light than another that has not those advantages. The quality of metal also will make some difference; but, if it should appear by experiments, that the metals or glasses in use will yield more or less light than here assigned, it is to be understood that the corrections must be made accordingly. We proceed now to find a proper expression for the power of penetrating into space, that we may be enabled to compare its effects, in different telescopes, with that of the natural eye. Since then the brightness of luminous objects is inversely as the squares of the distances, it follows, that the penetrating power must be as the square roots of the light received by the eye. MDCCC. K 66 Dr. HERSCHEL on the Power of In natural vision, therefore, this power is truly expressed by /a 1; and, since we have now also obtained a proper correc- tion x, we must apply it to the incident light with telescopes. In the Newronian and other constructions where two specula are used, there will also be some loss of light on account of the interposition of the small speculum; therefore, putting 6 for its diameter, we have 4* — b* for the real incident light. This being corrected as above, will give the general expression Val x 4° —b' for the same power in telescopes. But here we are to take notice, that in refractors, and in telescopes with one reflection, b will be = 0, and therefore is to be left out. Then, if we put natural light J = 1, and divide by a, we a have the general form for the penetrating power of all sorts of telescopes, compared to that of the natural eye as a standard, according to any supposed aperture of the iris, and proportion of light returned by reflection, or transmitted by refraction. In the following investigation we shall suppose a = 2 tenths of an inch, as being perhaps nearly the general opening of the iris, in star-light nights, when the eye has been some moderate time in the dark. The value of the corrections for loss of light will stand as has been given before. We may now proceed to determine the powers of the instru- ments that have been used in my astronomical observations ; but, as this subject will be best explained by a report of the penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 67 observations themselves, I shall select a series of them for that purpose, and relate them in the order which will be most illus- trating. First, with regard to the eye, it is certain that its power, like all our other faculties, is limited by nature, and is regulated by the permanent brightness of objects; as has been shewn already, when its extent with reflected light was compared to its exer- tion on self-luminous objects. It is further limited on borrowed light, by the occasional state of illumination; for, when that becomes defective at any time, the power of the eye will then be contracted into a narrower compass; an instance of which is the following. In the year 1776, when I had erected a telescope of 20 feet focal length, of the NewrontrAn construction, one of its effects by trial was, that when towards evening, on account of dark- ness, the natural eye could not penetrate far into space, the telescope possessed that power sufficiently to shew, by the dial of a distant church steeple, what o’clock it was, notwithstanding the naked eye could no longer see the steeple itself. Here I only speak of the penetrating power; for, though it might require magnifying power to see the figures on the dial, it could require none to see the steeple. Now the aperture of the tele- scope being 12 inches, and the construction of the NEWToNnIAN form, its penetrating power, when calculated according to the given formula, will be LEE == 98,99. A, b, and a, being all expressed in tenths of an inch.* * I have given the figures, in all the following equations of the calculated pene- trating powers, in order to shew the constructions of my instruments to those who may wish to be acquainted with them. K 2 68 Dr. HERSCHEL on the Power of From the result of this computation it appears, that the cir- cumstance of seeing so well, in the dusk of the evening, may be easily accounted for, by a power of this telescope to penetrate 39 times farther into space than the natural eye could reach, with objects so faintly illuminated. This observation completely refutes an objection to telescopic vision, that may be drawn from what has also been demon- strated by optical writers; namely, that no telescope can shew an object brighter than it is to the naked eye. For, in order to reconcile this optical theory with experience, I have only to say, that the objection is intirely founded on the same ambiguity of the word brightness that has before been detected. It is perfectly true, that the inérinsic illumination of the picture on the retina, which is made by a telescope, cannot exceed that of natural vision; but the absolute brightness of the magnified picture by which telescopic vision is performed, must exceed that of the picture in natural vision, in the same ratio in which the area of the magnified picture exceeds that of the natural one; supposing the intrinsic brightness of both pictures to be the same. In our present instance, the steeple and clock-dial were rendered visible by the increased absolute brightness of the object, which in natural vision was 15 hundred times inferior to what it was in the telescope. And this establishes beyond a doubt, that telescopic vision is performed by the absolute bright- ness of objects; for, in the present case, I find by computation, that the itrinsic brightness, so far from being equal in the tele- scope to that of natural vision, was inferior to it in the ratio of three to seven. ; The distinction between magnifying power, and a power of penetrating into space, could not but be felt long ago, though penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 69 * its theory has not been inquired into. ‘This undoubtedly gave rise to the invention of those very useful short telescopes called night-glasses. When the darkness of the evening curtails the natural penetrating power, they come in very seasonably, to the relief of mariners that are on the look out for objects which it is their interest to discover. Night-glasses, such as they are now generally made, will have a power of penetrating six or seven times farther into space than the natural eye. For, by the construction of the double eye-glass, these telescopes will magnify 7 or 8 times; and the object glass being 2+ inches in diameter, the breadth of the optic pencil will be 93 or 34 tenths ofan inch. As this cannot enter the eye, on a supposition of an opening of the iris of 2 tenths, we are obliged to increase the value of a, in order to make the telescope have its proper effect. Now, whether nature will admit of such an enlargement becomes an object of experiment; but, at all events, a cannot be assumed less than ae Then, if x be taken as has been determined for of A ASR AGS VO three refractions, we shall have ——=——-— = 6,46 or 7,39. Soon after the discovery of the Georgian planet, a very cele- brated observer of the heavens, who has added considerably to our number of telescopic comets and nebulz, expressed his wish, in a letter to me, to know by what method I had been led to suspect this object not to be a star, like others of the same appearance. I have no doubt but that the instrument through which this astronomer generally looked out for comets, had a penetrating power much more than sufficient to shew the new planet, since even the natural eye will reach it. But here we have an instance of the great difference in the effect of the two sorts of powers of telescopes ; for, on account of the smallness 70 Dr. HeRscuex on the Power of of the planet, a different sort of power, namely, that of magni- fying, was required ; and, about the time of its discovery, I had been remarkably attentive to an improvement of this power, as I happened to be then much in want of it for my very close double stars.* On examining the nebulz which had been discovered by many celebrated authors, and comparing my observations with the account of them in the Connoissance des Temps for 1783, I found that most of those which I could not resolve into stars with instruments of a small penetrating power, were easily resolved with telescopes of a higher power of this sort; and, that the effect was not owing to the magnifying power I used upon these occasions, will fully appear from the observations ; for, when the closeness of the stars was such as to require a considerable degree of magnifying as well as penetrating power, it always appeared plainly, that the instrument which had the highest penetrating power resolved them best, provided it had as much of the other power as was required for the purpose. Sept. 20, 1783, I viewed the nebula between FLAMSTEED’s ggth and 105th Piscium, discovered by Mr. Mecuan, in 1780, «It is not visible in the finder of my 7-feet telescope; but “ that of my 20-feet shews it.” Oct. 28, 1784, I viewed the same object with the 7-feet tele- scope. ; «Tt is extremely faint. With a magnifying power of 120, it «‘ seems to be a collection of very small stars: I see many of se"themiet * Magnifying powers of 460, 625, 932, 1159, 1504, 2010, 2398, 3168, 4294, 5489, 6450, 6652, were used upon « Bootis, y Leonis, « Lyre, &c. See Cat. of double stars, Phil, Trans. Vol, LXXII. page 115, and 147; and Vol. LXXV. page 48. penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 71 At the time of these observations, my 7-feet telescope had only a common finder, with an aperture of the object glass of about 3 of an inch in diameter, and a single eye-lens; there- / : . 1899 x75 Miele fore its penetrating power was —=~>— = 9,56. The finder of the 2o-feet instrument, being achromatic, had an object glass 1,17 inch in diameter; its penetrating power, therefore, V 85x17 72 was ——-———— = 4,50. Now, that one of them shewed the nebula and not the other, can only be ascribed to space-penetrating power, as both instru- ments were equal in magnifying power, and that so low as not to require an achromatic object glass to render the image sufhi- ciently distinct. The 7-feet reflector evidently reached the stars of the nebula ; but its penetrating and magnifying powers are very consi- derable, as will be shewn presently. July 30, 1783, I viewed the nebula south preceding FLam- STEED'S 24, Aquarii, discovered by Mr. Maratpl, in 1746. « In the small sweeper,* this nebula appears like a telescopic ‘comet.11 Oct. 27, 1794, The same nebula with a 7-feet reflector. * The small sweeper is a NEwTontan reflector, of 2 feet focal length 3 and, with an aperture of 4,2 inches, has only a magnifying power of 24, and a field of view 2° 12'. Its distinctness is so perfect, that it will shew letters at a moderate distance, with a magnifying power of 2000; and its movements are so convenient, that the eye remains at rest while the instrument makes a sweep from the horizon to the zenith. A large one of the same construction has an aperture of 9,2 inches, with a focal length of 5 feet 3 inches. It is also charged low enough for the eye to take in the whole optic pencil; and its penetrating power, with a double eye glass, is J 041 XQ27—217 - = Zor 72 Dr. Herscuzy on the Power of “ I can see that it is a cluster of stars, many of them being “¢ visible.” If we compare the penetrating power of the two instruments, we find that we have in the first Mobs senile = 12,84; and A / 5 627 seme 12% . in the latter #3 *~3 =" — 90,25, However, the magnify- ing power was partly concerned in this instance; for, in the sweeper it was not sufficient to separate the stars properly. March 4, 1783. With a 7-feet reflector, I viewed the nebula near the 5th Serpentis, discovered by Mr. Messier, in 1764, ‘It has several stars in it; they are however so small that I “ can but just perceive some, and suspect others.” May 31,1783. The same nebula with a 10-feet reflector; ° ; g a 162 penetrating power nals = 28,67. « With a magnifying power of 250, it is all resolved into “ stars: they are very close, and the appearance is beautiful. «« With 600, perfectly resolved. There is a considerable star not “far from the middle; another not far from one side, but out “of the cluster; another pretty bright one; and a great number “< of small ones.” Here we have a case where the penetrating power of 20 fell short, when gg resolved the nebula completely. This object requires also great magnifying power to shew the stars of it well; -but that power had before been tried, in the 7-feet, as far as 4,60, without success, and could only give an indication of its being composed of stars; whereas the lower magnifying power of 250, with a greater penetrating power, in the 10-feet instru- ment, resolved the whole nebula into stars. penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 73 May 3, 1783. I viewed the nebula between y and ¢ Ophiuchi, discovered by Mr. Messier, in 1764, « With a 10-feet reflector, and a magnifymg power of 250, « I see several stars in it, and make no doubt a higher power, « and more light, will resolve it all into stars.: This seems to be “a good nebula for the purpose of establishing the connection “« between nebulz and clusters of stars in general.” June 18, 1784. The same nebula viewed with a large New- : cr 88*—217 TONIAN 20-feet reflector; penetrating power WAU aaT = 61,18; and a magnifying power of 157. <«¢ A very large and very bright cluster of excessively com- ‘* pressed stars. The stars are but just visible, and are of une- “qual magnitudes: the large stars are red; and the cluster is « a miniature of that near FLAMsTEED’s 42d Come Berenices. cose tz" 6/396" s), BL): 108 18". Here, a penetrating power of 29, witha magnifying power of 250, would barely shew a few stars ; when, in the other instru- ment, a power 61 of the first sort, and only 157 of the latter, shewed them. completely well. July 4, 1783. I viewed the nebula between FLAMSTEED’s 295 and 26 Sagittarii, discovered by ABRAHAM IHLE, in 1665. « With a small 20-feet NEWTONIAN telescope, power 200, ‘it is all resolved into stars, that are very small and close. «« There must be some hundreds of them. With 350, I see the *¢ stars very plainly; but the nebula is too low in this latitude *‘ for such a power.”’ July 12, 1784. I viewed the same nebula with a large 20-feet NEwTONIAN reflector; power 157. ‘«« A most beautiful extensive cluster of stars, of various mag- *« nitudes, very compressed in the middle, and about 8’ in MDCCC. L 7 Ay Dr. HERSCHEL on the Power of ‘¢ diameter, besides the scattered ones, which do more than fill “the extent of the field of view:* the large stars are red; the «« small ones are pale red. RA 184 29’ 39”; PD 114° 7’.” The penetrating power of the first instrument was gg, that of the latter 61; but, from the observations, it is plain how much superior the effect of the latter was to that of the former, notwithstanding the magnifying power was so much in favour of the instrument with the small penetrating power. July 30, 1783. With a small 20-feet Newronian reflector, I viewed the nebula in the hand of Serpentarius, discovered by Mr. MEssIER, in 1764. ‘* With a power of 200, I see it consists of stars. ‘They are better visible with 300. With 600, they are too obscure to be «« distinguished, though the appearance of stars is still preserved. «This seems to be one of the most difficult objects to be ‘resolved. With me, there is not a doubt remaining; but *«‘ another person, in order to form a judgment, ought previously “to go through all the several gradations of nebule which I «« have resolved into stars.” May 25, 1791. I viewed the same nebula with a 20-feet reflector of my construction, having a penetrating power of v.64 fax soe =/7 5.00. « With a magnifying power of 157, it appears extremely « bright, round, and easily resolvable. With goo, I can see the ‘‘ stars. It resembles the cluster of stars taken at 16 493’ 40”,+ * This field, by the passage of an equatorial star, was 15’ 3”. + The object referred to is No. 10. of the Connoissance des Temps for 1783, called “« Nebuleuse sans etoiles.”” My description of it is, «« A very beautiful, and extremely «« compressed, cluster of stars: the most compressed part about 3 or 4 in diameter. « RA 16% 46’ 2”; PD 93° 46.” penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 1651 ** which probably would put on the same appearance as this, « if it were at a distance half as far again as it is. RA 17* 26° vo"; (PD9g 10" Here we may compare two observations; one taken with the penetrating power of 39, the other with 75; and, although the former instrument had far the advantage in magnifying power, the latter certainly gave a more complete view of the object. The 20-feet reflector having been changed from the NEw- TONIAN form to my present one, I had a very striking instance of the great advantage of the increased penetrating power, in the discovery of the Georgian satellites. ‘The improvement, by laying aside the small mirror, was from 61 to 75; and, whereas the former was not sufficient to reach these faint objects, the latter shewed them perfectly well. March 14, 1798. I viewed the Georgian planet with a new 64% 240)" ES = 95,853 and, having just before also viewed it with my_2o-feet instru- ment, I found, that with an equal magnifying power of goo, the 25-feet telescope had considerably the advantage of the former. Feb. 24, 1786. I viewed the nebula near FLAMSTEED’s 5th Serpentis, which has been mentioned before, with my g0-feet reflector; magnifying power 157. « The most beautiful extremely compressed cluster of small “ stars; the greatest part of them gathered together into one ‘« brilliant nucleus, evidently consisting of stars, surrounded ‘with many detached gathering stars of the same size and ‘colour. RA 15.7’ 19”; PD 87° 8’.” May 27, 1791. I viewed the same object with my 40-feet: Le 25-feet reflector. Its penetrating power is "6 Dr. HERSCHEL on the Power of telescope; penetrating power ps =1 91,69; magnify- ing power 370. sa “ A beautiful cluster of stars.. I counted about 200 of them. « The middle of it is so compressed that it is impossible to dis- “ tinguish the stars.” io Here it appears, that the superior penetrating power of the 40- feet telescope enabled me even to count the stars of this nebula. It is also to be noticed, that the object did not strike me as uncommonly beautiful ; because, with much more than double the penetrating, and also more than double the magnifying power, the stars could not appear so compressed and small as in the 20-feet instrument : this, very naturally, must give it more the resemblance of a coarser cluster of stars, such as I had been in the habit of seeing frequently. The 40-feet telescope was originally mtended to have been of the NEwTonIan construction; but, in the year 1787, when I was experimentally assured of the vast importance of a power to penetrate into space, I laid aside the work of the small mirror, which was then in hand, and completed the instrument in its present form. : “ Oct. 10,1791. I saw the 4th satellite and. the ring of « Saturn, in the 40-feet speculum, without an eye glass.” The magnifying power on that occasion could not exceed 60 or 70; but the great penetrating power made full amends for the lowness of the former; notwithstanding the greatest part of it must have been lost for want of a greater opening of the iris, which could not take in the whole pencil of rays, for this could not be less than 7 or 8 tenths of an inch. penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 77 Among other instances of the superior effects of penetration into space, I should mention the discovery of an additional 6th satel- lite of Saturn, on the 28th of August, 1789; and of a 7th, on the 11th of September, in the same year; which were first pointed out by this instrument. It is true that both satellites are within the reach of the 20-feet telescope; but it should be remembered, that when an object is once discovered by a superior power, an inferior one will suffice to see it afterwards. I need not add, that neither the 7 nor 10-feet telescopes will reach them; their powers, 20 and 29, are not sufficient to penetrate to such distant objects, when the brightness of them is not more than that of these satellites, It is also evident, that the failure in these latter instruments, arises not from want of magnifying power: as either of them has much more than sufficient for the purpose. Nov. 5, 1791. I viewed Saturn with the 20 and 40-feet telescopes. “ 20-feet. The 5th satellite of Saturn is very small. The 1st, “od, 3d, 4th, 5th, and the new 6th satellite, are in their cal- “ culated places.” “ 4o-feet. I see the new 6th satellite much better with this ‘¢ instrument than with the go-feet. The 5th is also much larger “‘ here than in the 20-feet; in which it was nearly the same size “as a small fixed star, but here it is considerably larger than ‘¢ that star.” Here the superior penetrating power of the 40-feet telescope shewed itself on the 6th satellite of Saturn, which is a very faint object; as it had also a considerable advantage in magnifying power, the disk of the 5th satellite appeared larger than in the 20-feet. But the small star, which may be said to be beyond 78 Dr. Herscuer on the Power of the reach of magnifying power, could only profit by the supe- riority of the other power. Nov. 21, 1791. 40-feet reflector; power 370. “ The black division upon the ring is as dark as the heavens “ about Saturn, and of the same colour.” “ The shadow of the body of Saturn is visible upon the ring, “on the following side; its colour is very different from that “‘ of the dark division. The 5th satellite is less than the gd; it “is even less than the ed.” 20-feet reflector; power goo. “ The gd satellite seems to be smaller than it was the last night “but one. The 4th satellite seems to be larger than it was the “19th. This telescope shews the satellites not nearly so well “as the 40-feet.”’ Here, the magnifying power being nearly alike, the superi- ority of the 40-feet telescope must be ascribed to its penetrating power. The different nature of the two powers above mentioned being thus evidently established, I must now remark, that, in some respects, they even interfere with each other; a few instances of which I shall give. August 24, 1783. I viewed the nebula north preceding FLAMSTEED’s 1 Trianguli, discovered by Mr. MEssIER, in 1764. « 7-feet reflector; power 57. There is a suspicion that the «‘ nebula consists of exceedingly small stars. With this low penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 79 *« power it has a nebulous appearance; and it vanishes when I * put on the higher magnifying powers of 278 and 460.” Oct. 28, 1794. I viewed the same nebula with a 7-feet reflector. “It is large, but very faint. With 120, it seems to be com- ‘“< posed of stars, and I think I see several of them; but it will “ bear no magnifying power.” In this experiment, magnifying power was evidently injurious to penetrating power. Ido not account for this upon the principle that by magnifying we make an object less bright; for, when opticians have also demonstrated that brightness is diminished by magnifying, it must again be understood as relating only to the zntrinsic brightness of the magnified picture; its absolute brightness, which is the only one that concerns us at present, must always remain the same.* ‘The real explanation of the fact, I take to be, that while the light collected is employed in magnifying the object, it cannot be exerted in giving penetrating power. * This may be proved thus. The mean intrinsic brightness, or rather illumination, of a point of the picture on the retina, will be all the light tbat falls on the picture; divided by the number of its points; or C = Ww Now, since with a greater magni- fying power m, the number of points N increases as the squares of the power, the expression for the intrinsic brightness —, will decrease in the same ratio; and it will N F Z consequently be in general N a m7”, and vo Caw —; that is, by compounding a CN « = =/=1:; or absolute brightness a given quantity. M. Boucuer has carefully distinguished intrinsic and absolute brightness, when he speaks of the quan- tity of light reflected from a wall, at different distances. Traite' d’Optique, page 39, and 40. 80 Dr. HERscuEL on the Power of June 18, 1799. I viewed the planet Venus with a 10-feet reflector. “Its light is so vivid that it does not require, nor will it bear, “a penetrating power of 29, neither with a low nor with a “ high magnifying power.” This is not owing to the least imperfection in the mirror, which is truly parabolical, and shews, with all its aperture open, and a magnifying power of 600, the double star y Leonis in the greatest perfection. « It shewed Venus, perfectly well defined, with a penetrating ** power as low as 14, and a magnifying power of 400, or 600.” Here, penetrating power was injurious to magnifying power; and that it necessarily must be so, when carried to a high pitch, is evident; for, by enlarging the aperture of the telescope, we increase the evil that attends magnifying, which is, that we cannot magnify the object without magnifying the medium. Now, since the air is very seldom of so homogeneous a dispo- sition as to admit to be magnified highly, it follows that we must meet with impurities and obstructions, in proportion to its quantity. But the contents of the columns of air through which we look at the heavens by telescopes, being of equal lengths, must be as their bases, that is, as the squares of the apertures of the telescopes; and this is in a much higher ratio than that of the increase of the power of penetrating into space. From my long experience in these matters, I am led to appre- hend, that the highest power of magnifying may possibly not exceed the reach of a 20 or 25-feet telescope; or may even lie in a less compass than either. However, in beautiful nights, when the outside of our telescopes is dropping with moisture dis- charged from the atmosphere, there are now and then favourable penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 81 hours, in which it is hardly possible to put a limit to magni- fying power. But such valuable opportunities are extremely scarce; and, with large instruments, it will always be lost labour to observe at other times. As I have hinted at the natural limits of magnifying power, [ shall venture also to extend my surmises to those of pene- trating power. There seems to be room for a considerable increase in this branch of the telescope; and, as the penetrating power of my 40-feet reflector already goes to 191,69, there can hardly be any doubt but that it might be carried to’s00, and probably not much farther. The natural limit seems to be an equation between the faintest star that can be made visible, by any means, and the united brilliancy of star-light. For, as the light of the heavens, in clear nights, is already very considerable in my large telescope, it must in the end be so increased, by enlarging the penetrating power, as to become a balance to the light of all objects that are so remote as not to exceed in brightness the general light of the heavens. Now, if P be put Pa? for penetrating power, we have Ai — == 4 == Tomreet) 52 inches for an aperture of a reflector, on my construction, that would have such a power of 500. But, to return to our subject; from what has been said before, we may conclude, that objects are viewed in their greatest per- fection, when, in penetrating space, the magnifying power is so low as only to be sufficient to shew the object well; and when, in magnifying objects, by way of examining them mi- nutely, the space-penetrating power is no higher that what will suffice for the purpose; for, in the use of either power, the inju- dicious overcharge of the other, will prove hurtful to perfect vision. MDCCC. M 82 Dr. HERScHEL on the Power of Se ee OO RC It is remarkable that, from very different principles, I have formerly determined the length of the visual ray of my 20-feet telescope upon the stars of the milky way, so as to agree nearly with the calculations that have been given.* The extent of what I then figuratively called my sounding line, and what now appears to answer to the power of penetrating into space, was shewn to be not less than 415, 461, and 497 times the distance of Sirius from the sun. We now have calculated that my tele- scope, in the NewTonian form, at the time when the paper on the Construction of the Heavens was written, possessed a power of penetration, which exceeded that of natural vision 61,18 times; and, as we have also shewn, that stars at 8, 9, or at most 10 _times the distance of Sirius, must become invisible to the eye, we may Safely conclude, that no single star, above 489, 551, or at most 612 times as far as Sirius, can any longer be seen in this telescope. Now, the greatest length of the former visual ray, 497, agrees nearly with the lowest of these present numbers, 489 ; and the higher ones are all in favour of the former com- putation ; for that ray, though taken from what was perhaps not far from its greatest extent, might possibly have reached to some distance beyond the apparent bounds of the milky way: but, if there had been any considerable difference in these deter- minations, we should remember that some of the data by which I have now calculated are only assumed. For instance, if the opening of the iris, when we look at a star of the 7th magnitude, should be only one-tenth of an inch and a half, instead of two, then a, in our formula, will be = 1,5; which, when resolved, ® Phil. Trans. Vol. LXXV. page 247, 248. penetrating into Space by Telescopes. 83 will give a penetrating power of 81,58; and therefore, on this supposition, our telescope would easily have shewn stars 571 times as far from us as Sirius; and only those at 653, 734, or 816 times the same distance, would have been beyond its reach. My reason for fixing upon two-tenths, rather than a lower quan- tity, was, that I might not run a risk of over-rating the powers of my instruments. I have it however in contemplation, to determine this quantity experimentally, and perceive already, that the difficulties which attend this subject may be overcome. {t now only remains to shew, how far the penetrating power, ig2, of my large reflector, will really reach into space. Then, since this number has been calculated to be in proportion to the standard of natural vision, it follows, that if we admit a star of the 7th magnitude to be visible to the unassisted eye, this tele- scope will shew stars of the one thousand three hundred and forty-second magnitude. But, as we did not stop at the single stars above mentioned, when the penetration of the natural eye was to be ascertained, so we must now also call the united lustre of sidereal systems to our aid in stretching forwards into space. Suppose therefore, a cluster of 5000 stars to be at one of those immense distances to which only a 4c-feet reflector can reach, and our formula will give us the means of calculating what that may be. For, putting S for the number of stars in the cluster, and D for its / zc As a distance, we have = D;* which, on computation. * D = 11765475948678678679 miles. M e 84 Dr. HERscuEL on the Power of comes out to be above 113 millions of millions of millions of miles! A number which exceeds the distance of the nearest fixed star, at least three hundred thousand times. From the above considerations it follows, that the range for observing, with a telescope such as my 40-feet reflector, is indeed very extensive. We have the inside of a sphere to exa- mine, the radius of which is the immense distance just now assigned to be within the reach of the penetration of our instru- ments, and of which all the celestial objects visible to the eye, put together, form as it were but the kernel, while all the im- mensity of its thick shell is reserved for the telescope. It follows, in the next place, that much time must be required for going through so extensive a range. The method of exa- mining the heavens, by sweeping over space, instead of looking merely at places that are known to contain objects, is the only one that can be useful for discoveries. In order therefore to calculate how long a time it must take to sweep the heavens, as far as they are within the reach of my 40-feet telescope, charged with a magnifying power of 1000, I have had recourse to my journals, to find how many favour- able hours we may annually hope for in this climate. It is to be noticed, that the nights must be very clear; the moon absent; no twilight; no haziness; no violent wind; and no sudden change of temperature; then also, short intervals for filling up broken sweeps will occasion delays; and, under all these circumstances, it appears that a year which will afford go, or at most 100 hours, is to be called very productive. penetrating into, Space by Telescopes, 85 In the equator, with my 20-feet telescope, I have swept over zones of two degrees, with a power of 157; but, an allowance of 10 minutes in polar distance must be made, for lapping the sweeps over one another where they join. As the breadth of the zones may be increased towards the poles, the northern hemisphere may be swept in about 4,0 zones : to these we must add ig southern zones; then, 59 zones, which, on account of the sweeps lapping over one another about 5 of time in right ascension, we must reckon of 25 hours each, will give 1475 hours. And, allowing 100 hours per year, we find that, with the 20-feet telescope, the heavens may be swept in about 14 years and 3. Now, the time of sweeping with different magnifying powers will be as the squares of the powers; and, putting p and ¢ for the power and time in the 20-feet telescope, and P = 1000 for the power in. the 40, we shall have p*: ¢:: P’: s = = 59840. Then,. making the same allowance of 100 hours per year, it appears that it will require not less than 598 years, to look with the 40-feet reflector, charged with the abovementioned power, only one single moment into each part of space; and, even then, so much of the southern hemisphere will remain unex- plored, as will take up 213 years more to examine. Slough, near Windsor, June 20, 1799. [ 86 J V. A second Appendix to the improved Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy, inserted in the Philosophical Transactions for the Year 1798, containing some further Remarks, and improved Formule for computing the Coefficients A and B; by which the arithmetical Work is considerably shortened and facilitated. By the Rev. John Hellins, B.D. F.R.S. and Vicar of Potter’s Pury, 7x Northamptonshire. Read December 12, 1799. a. Ir was shewn, in Art. g- of the first Appendix, that the 1+/(1—cc) c common logarithm of the fraction » when ¢ is ex- pressed in numbers, might be taken out from Taytor’s excel- lent tables, and converted into an hyperbolic logarithm by means of table XXXVII. of Dopson’s Calculator; which method of obtaining the H. L. iy) is undoubtedly easier and shorter than the more obvious one of first computing the numerical value of that fraction, and then taking out the hyper- bolic logarithm corresponding to it from a table. But yet, that method of obtaining the value of a, easy as it is, requires, first, a search in the table for the angle of which ¢ is the sine, and generally a proportion for the fractional parts of a second; then, a division of the degrees, minutes, and seconds contained in that angle, by 2; and, thirdly, another search for the loga- rithmic tangent of half the angle, and another proportion to find the fractional parts of a second. I was therefore desirous Mr. Heuuins’s Second Appendix, &c. 87 of finding some easier and shorter method of performing the whole business, without the use of any trigonometrical tables, in which time is required, not only in searching for logarithms, but also in making proportions for the fractional parts of a second; and, after some consideration, I discovered that which I am now to explain. This method, then, together with some further observations which I have made for facilitating and abridging the work of computing the values of A and B, will make up the contents of this Paper. 2. The jy ieee ee , which was denoted. by «, both in the solution of the problem and in. the Appendix, is = H. 1. 4 iS be deg: Oa —— * &c. andif, for the sake of distine= tion, the eau letter a Be put for H. L. = -~, we shall have «=a — z a 8. (of which series, the first three terms are suffi- cient me our eck purpose) ; and this value of « being written a ce ° 3 3°55 . ° for it in the expression a (1 pi 6c oh which occurs in the first theorem in Art. 12. of the first Appendix, we shall 3 35 cc 3 \. : have (1 + see + a5 ct x [a on ee ct ; that is, by: ac-- tual multiplication, ce BiG SeSh Ge Geri, ga Art. 2: of * Since H. L. ——— eyo =a + Ea + — Sree » Be. (See Art. 250 = 4 6 ee rierendee thet Lee Pi ee ae ET 2 2.2 2 4.4 2.4.6.6 &e. and consequently H. L, ~ x Ve will be = H.L. {| 1+ (1c) Cc oi] c* » Se. c 4 4.8 88 Mr. Heruins’s Second Appendix to the improved 14+ 4¢¢ 422 ir beens py i\ sel Tach Aa 4 4.8 Shae Pe She | a+ acc ri teae ; 8 8.8 3 ; 3:5 4 fale a+ = ace +44 ae Teme me ee 4 16 ou Se gt 4.8 J Now the terms — 4 cc and — 3. ct may very easily be added to the terms fcc and gc’, 7.e. to 0°1036802 cc and 0:0687064,c’, which will then become — 0°1463198 ¢c, and — 01187936 c*; and, by denoting the coefficients of these new terms by the Roman letters — f and — g respectively, the first theorem in the Art. before mentioned, or the value of A, is- Zz +e— fcc — ge 3 ‘ +a-+- acc + 33 act, iJ ce a (a+b) 3 a « . -§.21 . g. The expression « fe SEE ots cll which occurs 4.12 Abtiz giz in the value of A’, in Art. 12. of the first Appendix, is = 3 3-5 3-5-21 A4 par A.12 GC sr AL12.32 : a—-—c— + c 4 8 3 3-5 365-21 a ~. AGC ThE 2 aererer 3 3-5 35 21. a+ acc +- a 3 3.5 4 4.12 4.12.32 ee eC Gi i 16 12.16 3 19 a — + c— ~ Cc 9 I 8.16 4 mh Sane miteaae P 3 19 4 : Here again the terms — cc and — 7% c* may very easily be added to the terms zcc and kc‘, i.e. to o10551502cc and a Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy. 89 0°0408309 ct, and we shall have the two new terms — 0'1323498 cc and — 01076091 c*. Let the coefficients of these two new terms be denoted by the Roman letters — i and — k respectively, and the second theorem in Art. 12 of the first Appendix Bee. [3s + —— + b—ipomn ket I am (a+b) % “oO ss a2 le 45 aoe We. _ 4. The product of a (2 res 4+ = which is found in. the third theorem of the Art. before referred to, is = e+—ctsc a ct 4.12. ABs a—.—co— —— c* 4.8 ga-+ 75 acc + 73a b. ae gilt f2at pace + ac =a me, 68) I Sil ot 2 | —ZCC — FC. — 4 Here likewise, the terms — tcc and — ;4-c* may be added to 0'3465736cc and 01793226c*, which are = /cc and mc‘ respectively; the coefficients of which being denoted by the Roman letters | and m, the third theorem in the Art. before referred to becomes eis 5 5 p — lec —mc* i i aa +2a+lacc + act 2 2.16 7 5. These new forms to which the theorems are now brought, it is evident, are no less convenient, and on examination they will be found no less accurate, than the original ones ; and, that the common logarithm of -, (and consequently the hyperbolic logarithm of it,) is much more easily and expeditiously obtained MDCCC. N go Mr. HeLuns’s Second Appendix to the improved 1+ (106) Cc than the common logarithm of , even with the use of Tay.tor’s excellent tables, is too obvious to need a description ; and therefore it follows, that a computation by these new for- mule will be easier and shorter than by those in the first Appendix. 6. But there are still some expedients by which the compu- tations of A, B, &c. may be further facilitated and abridged. It is pretty evident, to any one who contemplates the coeffi- cients of the are terms in the first three theorems, that the terms a+ 3acc + 3 3 ac‘, in the first theorem, being once found, the logarithmic terms of the second and third theorems may most easily be derived from them; in consequence of which, the se part of the time of writing down the loga- rithms of +5, 34, 4, and 3%, logarithms of acc and ac*, and of searching in the tables for of twice writing down the the numbers corresponding to py ae, and ae 32 aC, in the second theorem, and for those which correspond to tacc, and OOy 2.16 which I am next to explain. ac*, in the third theorem, is saved. These are the expedients 7. The three terms a, 3acc, and 32 = ac’, hich are found in the first theorem, are evidently to “ eo terms 3a, ain ace, 5.21 ° 5 and meee which are found in the second theorem, in the ratio of 1 to 3, 1 to £, and 1 to Z respectively ; or as 1 to1—4, 1 to 1—4, and 1 to 1—4; by which mixed numbers, the 6? logarithmic terms in the second theorem may more easily be, derived from those in the first theorem, than by the fractions, as will appear further on. Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy. gi 8. It is no less evident, that the three logarithmic terms a, dace, and 33 ac‘, mentioned in the preceding Art. are to the three logarithmic terms 2a, Lacc, and —. zac’, which occur in the third theorem, in the ratio of 1 to 2, 1 to + 4, and 1 to & respectively; or asi1toi-+1,1to1+4,and1toi+4; by which mixed numbers, as was observed in the preceding Art. the logarithmic terms in the third theorem may be more easily derived from those in the first theorem, than by the fractions. g. The first of the logarithmic terms in the first theorem has already been denoted by the Roman letter a; now let the second and third, wz. acc, and ac’, be denoted by the Homan letters b and c pe ee and let the sum of these three terms, viz. a+ 2acc 4+ +3 act, now denoted by a+b+c, be put = 5S; then, by Art. 4: logarithmic terms in the second theorem will be (1 — $)a, (1 —Z)b, and (1 —£)c; and the sum of these terms will be a+ b+ c—— _— —— a b c , : 3 f =S§S ee Gt ae where S is given, it being = the three logarithmic terms in the first theorem, with which the compu- tation ought to begin; and the 4, 4, and = of these terms respec- tively, are very easily computed without the use of logarithms, as will hereafter appear. by an example. And the logarithmic terms in the third theorem will likewise be denoted by 2a, (1-++4)b, and (1+ 4)c respectively; the sum of which is==a-+b4c+a+tb+4c=Spa+—+<, where S, as well as a, b, and c, being given, the fractional parts are very easily computed without the use of logarithins. 10. Having now described these short and easy methods of Ne 92 Mr. Hetutns’s Second Appendix to the improved computing the values of a, b, and c, and of deriving the other logarithmic terms from them, and having introduced a new and more compendious notation of several of the,terms in each of the first three theorems, it will be proper next to exhibit those theorems in this improved state, and, after that, to give an example or two of computing by them. He she og es ; x (a+b) + aa Leal 3acc(=b) + 32 act (=c). sie tig $b ice — ket a b Cc pees Gea ; I eA SaiaE S| p — lec —me* 2a 3. B=5 an crm} ghee ( p—lcec—me* Or, putting A to denote the product of —— aati - x | 4s4 af toe this theorem will be more concisely and commodiously ex- pressed thus; B= + (Aa— A). 4. B= = (A’a—A). N.B.S=a+b-+c. 11. We might now proceed to an example of computing by these theorems; but it will be very convenient first to set down the constant numbers and constant logarithms which are to be used in these computations. The constant numbers, taken from Art. 12 of the first Appendix, and Art. 2, 3, and 4 of this Appendix, are the fol- lowing : € = 0°193154,72, b = 0'0823,604, p = 1°3862,944, f = 0'1463,198, i = 0'1323,498, 1 = 0'1534,264, g = 0'1187,936, k = 0'1076,091, Mm =='01831,7 74, Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy. 93 And the constant logarithms to be used in these calculations are the following, which are respectively set down to as many places of figures as are requisite. L.g=o 3010,300, L. 3 = 1'5740,3, pe a 1796, L.3= — 18 8239,087, LS 0.1249,4, LL. So 0'4.971,4,99; Lf = 1'1653,0, Tyd = 1°1217,2, a — 1°1859,1, L.= = 1°910, ie * = T7910, L. + = 1939. By comparing this Art. with Art. 13 of the first Appendix, it will appear, that thé number of logarithms used in the new formule is very considerably less than the number used in those from which they were derived; and still fewer will suffice, since the term == which occurs in the second theorem, is most easily derived from —, * the first term in the first theorem, the loga~ rithms of =, <3 and cc, being there ready calculated; so that L. £ needs not be used in the computation. 12. Let us now compute A and B by the first and third of these new formule, when Venus and the earth are the two planets. * See Art. 11 of the first Appendix, 94 First, for the value of A. Numbers. Logarithms. Here a = 1'5236,71 \ 0°1828,913 Ar. co. 1'84,00,841 2°894.9,305 0°4,72.5,855 and 6 = 1°44,51,60 a— b =0'0785,11 at b = 2-9688,31 a—b = Wp oe = ~ 2°4,223,4,50 - - 1°8786,8 50 fog ~ 1/3) 587 O55 +c ~ - 2°999 Sum of these two logarithms 5-920 - The sum of these four terms is Mr. Hexuins’s Second Appendix to the improved Numbers.* 7562841 = — 0119315 =e 7582156 == +e — 0'00387 = — fcc — 000008 = — gc* —0'00395 = — fcc — ge 75,01 761. Having now found the value of the four terms = +e —fee —gc*, we must next find the value of the three logarithmic terms a + 3 acc + 3S act, or atb-+-+c=S, which may quickly and easily be done as follows, The common logarithm of 2 is Half the common logarithm of cc is The common logarithm of = is 0°3010,300 1°2111,725 1:0898,575; and this lo garithm, reduced to an hyperbolic logarithm, by Table XXXVII. * See Art. 14 of the first Appendix, paragraph the third. 4 Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy. 95 of Dopson’s Calculator, gives - - 250949 —=4. a 0°39959 3¢¢ 399638 Sum of these two logarithms 2:39597 002489 = 2acc =b 2CC 2°218 Sum of these two logarithms 4614 0'0004,1 == a Sact= Cc The sum of these three termsis = - 2:53479 = S; to which add the sum of the four terms above found 75°81761, and we have 78°35240 =all the terms. 1°8940,523 a(a+b)* 1:2060,282 The diff. of these two 18a | 0°6880,241 4°87555 = A. ii 3 rithms is = 13. We are next to compute the value of B; which compu- _ tation will be much facilitated by the use of numbers already found in the computation of the value of A. The arithmetical work may stand as follows. 96 1°38630 = p lec 360806 — 0'00406 =—lcec C6 2°361 5969 — 0'00009 = — mc* 1382 15 = the sum of these three terms. 253479 = 8 2°5094,9 =a b 0'00830 se 0°00008 = 0'8085,357 6°4.3481 = thesum of all the terms. w(a+b)¥ 07334,427 Dif. of these two log’. 0:0750,930 —-1:188 74. = A A 0'6880,241 a 0°1828,913 Sum of these two log’. 0°8709,154 7.4,2874,—= Aa 0'7951,846 6:240co = Aa—A + Ona, 14d | = (Aa— A) 0:9362,987 863579 = B. Mr. HEuins’s Second Appendix to the improved 14. We have now the values sought, vz. A = 48756, and B = 8.6357; which values, computed by the new formula, agree with those which were given in the first Appendix, which is one proof of the accuracy of the new forms to which the theorems are brought. And, that the calculations of these . numbers are considerably facilitated and abridged by the use of HL. 2“ __ 35 instead of H.L. +¥0=, and by the Solution of a Problem in physical Astronomy. 97 easy method of deriving the logarithmic terms in the second and third theorems from those in the first, will quickly appear to any one who shall make trial, by a calculation both by the original formule and by those which are given in this paper, or who shall compare the computations of A and B in the first Appendix, with the computations here exhibited. MDCCC. O C 98 J VI. Account of a Peculiarity in the Distribution of the Arteries sent to the Limbs of slow-moving Animals ; together with some other similar Facts. In a Letter from Mr. Anthony Carlisle, Surgeon, to John Symmons, Esq. F. R. S. Read Jan. 9, 1800. DEAR SIR, ‘Tur Maucauco you have been so obliging as to give me for the purpose of dissection, has proved a subject of considerable interest. This animal, the Lemur tardigradus of LINNzZvs, was injected, with a view to exhibit the course of the arteries; and they present a very unusual deviation from the ordinary arrange- ment of this class of blood-vessels in animals generally. Before I had leisure to inquire further into this peculiarity, I presented a drawing of the appearances to my friend Dr. Suaw, of the British Museum, for the purpose of being made public in his work of natural history, now in the press. Since that time, I have, through Dr. Suaw’s assistance, been enabled to investi- gate this subject somewhat farther; and, if you consider the following account in any degree worthy the attention of the Royal Society, I shall receive an additional honour by its pro-~ ceeding through your hands. The Lemur tardigradus, in its injected state, accompanies this paper; and, for the kind of preparation, the vessels are filled with more than ordinary success. The arteries alone are injected ; and the peculiarity of their arrangement is to be observed in the axillary arteries, and in the iliacs. These vessels, at their entrance into the upper and lower limbs, are suddenly divided Mr. CaRLIsLE on a ralliartly, &c. 99 into a number of equal-sized cylinders, which occasionally anastomose with each other. They are exclusively distributed on the muscles; whilst the arteries sent to all the parts of the body, excepting the limbs, divide in the usual arborescent form; and, even those arteries of the limbs which are employed upon substances not muscular, branch off like the common blood- vessels. I counted twenty-three of these cylinders, parallel to each other, about the middle of the upper arm; and seventeen in the inguinal fasciculus.* This fact appeared at first too solitary for the foundation of any physiological reasoning; but, having since had an oppor- tunity of prosecuting the inquiry, among animals of similar habits and character, I have been encouraged to hope that the result may eventually assist in the elucidation of muscular motion. The Bradypus tridactylus, or great American Sloth, has a similar distribution of the arteries of its limbs to that already described in the Lemur tardigradus; which will be better under- stood by the annexed figures. See Plate II. figs. 1 and 2; and the explanations. The communications of these vessels with each other are’ more frequent than in the Lemur tardigradus, and their number is considerably greater. I counted forty-two separate cylinders upon the superficies of the brachial fasci- culus; and, from the bulk of the fasciculus, I estimate that there were twenty, or more, concealed in the middle. The lower extremity has its arteries less divided, and they are of larger diameter. I observed only thirty-four branches in the middle of the thigh; and the first series of ramifications were larger than the subsequent ones. May not this have some relation to the greater distance of the lower limb from the * See Plate I. and its references, page 103. O2 100 Mr. CaruisLE on a Peculiarity heart? The extremely slow movements of the Bradypus tridac- tylus are sufficiently known among natural historians. The Bradypus didactylus has its arterial system distributed in some degree like the tridactylus ; but the brachial artery in the upper limb is much less subdivided, as will appear by the repre- sentation in Plate II. fig. 3; and, in the lower limb, the arteries of the plexus afterwards divide a few times in the arborescent form. It may be worthy of remark, that this correspondence of ar- rangement, in the arteries of the lesser Sloth, bears a striking analogy with the structure and habits of the large American Sloth; the movements of the Bradypus didactylus being univer- sally represented quicker than those of the Bradypus tridactylus. The Lemur Loris was next examined, and its arterial system was found to resemble those already described ; but, as the ani- mal had been preserved in very strong spirit, the vessels were so corrugated as not to admit of injection. The two Bradypi were injected with quicksilver. The natural history of the Lemur Loris appears not to be very well ascertained; but it is a slow- moving animal, and has been confounded with the species called tardigradus, although doubtless a much more agile creature. See Plate Il. figs. 5, and 6. ; In all the quadrupeds before mentioned, the other blood- vessels, as well as the nerves, presented the common appear- ances. ‘The size of the heads, and the interior capacity of the skulls, both in the Bradypus tridactylus and the Lemur tardigradus, seemed smaller in proportion than is usual among animals, so that the quantity of brain must be less than ordinary. The effect of this peculiar disposition of the arteries, in the limbs of these slow-moving quadrupeds, will be that of retard- ing the velocity of the blood. It is well known, and has been in the Arteries of slow-moving Animals. 104 explained by various writers, that the blood moves quicker in the arteries near the heart, than in the remote branches; and also, that fluids move more rapidly through tubes which branch off suddenly from large trunks, than if they had been propelled for a considerable distance through small-sized cylinders ; besides which, the frequent communications in the cylinders of the Bradypus tridactylus must produce eddies, which will retard the progress of the fluid. From these and a variety of other facts, which it is not necessary to specify, it will appear, that one effect upon the animal economy, connected with this arrange- ment of vessels, must be, that of diminishing the velocity of the blood passing into the muscles of the limbs. It may be difficult to determine, whether the slow movement of the blood sent to ‘these muscles be a subordinate convenience to other primary causes of their slow contraction, or whether it be of itself the immediate and principal cause. The facts at present ascertained, relative to muscular motion, do not authorize me to treat de- cidedly of the share which the vascular system holds in the operation of muscular contraction. Certain it is, that a larger proportion of arteries is sent to the muscles of quadrupeds, than to the ordinary substances; and the extreme redness of these organs shews that their capillaries are of large diameter. A greater degree of redness is also observable in those muscles (of the same animal) which are most frequently called into action. The habits of life among the tardigrade animals, give occasion for the long continued contraction of some muscles in their limbs: these creatures are represented clinging to the boughs of trees, and remaining thus, without locomotion, for several hours. The powers which require so long a time to determine the contraction of a series of muscles, are probably 102 Mr. CaRuisLE on a Peculiarity no less slow in restoring the parts to their former condition ; or, if the restoration is to be effected by antagonist muscles under the same circumstances, then, the flexion and extension of every part of the limbs will correspond, as to time. I have not met with any arrangement of blood-vessels ana- logous to those described, except in the carotid artery of the Lion. May not this peculiarity be subservient to the long conti- nued exertion of the muscles of his jaws, whilst holding a powerful animal, such as a Horse or Buffalo, and thus enable him to retain his prey, until it is wearied out by ineffectual struggles? I believe also, that those animals which chew the cud, have a plexus of arteries in the neck, analogous to the rete mirabile: but this fact has not yet been verified in all the rumi- nating quadrupeds; and the effect of these arrangements seems rather to operate as sluices to the arteries of the masticating muscles, than directly as the means of retarding the velocity of their fluids. It is however necessary to examine these subjects more accurately.* As I have instituted a series of experiments and inquiries, with the hope of elucidating this subject, it would be improper to trouble you, or the Royal.Society, with any physiological reasonings until these are completed. ) I have the honour to. be, &c. Soho Square, ANT. CARLISLE. October 28th, 1799. * There is a rete mirabile in the genus Bos, and in some of the Cervi which I have seen; but of these and the other Pecora a fuller description will be given in a future paper. s 2 in the Arteries of slow-moving Animals. 103 P.S.. The Maucauco which you lately possessed, was suffi- ciently quick in the movements of its head to snap a person’s finger, when touched incautiously; and the motion of its jaw, when chewing, was not slower than in other animals. A Maucauco of the same species, kept among the wild beasts in the Tower of London, was very apt to bite those who, calculating the movements of its head by those of its limbs, approached within the length of its neck: the chewing of this animal was similar to that of a Cat. These external habits of motion, com- pared with those of the limbs, coincide very much with the internal structure here described. REFERENCES TO THE FIGURES. Plate I. The figure represents a dried preparation of the Lemur tar- digradus, exhibiting the appearances of the arterial system. a, the carotid arteries. b, the axillary artery, dividing into the plexus described. c, the iliac arteries, dividing into the cylindrical ramifications. The other parts of the arterial system are represented according to the natural and ordinary disposition. Plate II. Fig. 1, shews the axilla of the Bradypus tridactylus, dissected to expose the vessels. a, the sterno mastoideus muscle, passing under the skin of the neck. 6, part of the axillary plexus of nerves; the median pro- ceeding along the arm, with the large blood-vessels, and giving off two branches of communication with the ulnar nerve. a 104 Mr. CaRusLe on a Peculiarity c, the subclavian vein. d, the first bone of the sternum, attached to its second bone, and to the first and second ribs. e, the subclavian artery, passing into the axilla behind the large veins, and dividing itself into a great number of equal- sized cylinders, which cling together, frequently anastomose, and take the ordinary route of the main trunks of arteries in the upper limbs of quadrupeds. Fig. 2, the brim of the pelvis and groin of the Bradypus tri- dactylus, with the vessels exposed. a, the aorta, where it divides into the two great iliac branches; the iliac artery on the right side being continued, to shew the division into the anastomosing cylinders which are sent to the muscles. 6, part of the iliacus internus muscle. ¢, part of the bony margin of the pelvis leading down to the pubes. Fig. 3, the upper limb of the Bradypus didactylus. a, a portion of skin on the top of the shoulder. b, the axillary artery, divided more in the ordinary way than in the former animal. This creature had been preserved in ardent spirit containing camphor; and the dissection could not be prosecuted so satisfactorily as to expose every small branch. ¢, part of the axillary plexus of nerves. Fig. 4, the iliac vessels of the Bradypus didactylus. a, the tendon of the psoas muscle. b, the iliac artery, proceeding into the thigh, where its divi- sions are more discernible than in the upper limb. The cylin- dric tubes were however much fewer than in the Bradypus iridactylus. X counted only eight tubes in the inguinal fasciculus ee Lhites Tratig MD CCC. Late Lpaes. ~* wer Calis Philos, ans. MD CCC Male ps4 | Ns eee fy x T*Bafir Lhilos Trans. MD CCC Hate Inver 1 De del, ai in the Arteries of slow-moving Animals. 105 of this Sloth, whereas in the same part of the tridactylus there were at least forty. c, part of the rim of the pelvis. Fig. 5, the upper limb of the Lemur Loris. a, the head of the os brachii. b, the axillary artery, proceeding along the arm, and dividing into seven or eight cylinders. Fig. 6, the inguinal arteries of the Lemur Loris. a, the iliac artery, dividing as it passes the groin into five or six cylinders. 6, the bony margin of the pelvis. The figures are of the size of the different natural objects. MDCCC, |e [106 j VII. Outlines of Experiments and Inquiries respecting Sound and Light. By Thomas Young, M. D. F. R.S. Ina Letter to Edward Whitaker Gray, M. D. Sec. R.S. Read January 16, 1800. DEAR SIR, Ir has long been my intention to lay before the Royal Society a few observations on the subject of sound; and I have endea- voured to collect as much information, and to make as many experiments, connected with this inquiry, as circumstances enabled me to do; but, the further I have proceeded, the more widely the prospect of what lay before me has been extended ; ‘and, as I find that the investigation, in all its magnitude, will occupy the leisure hours of some years, or perhaps of a life, I am determined, in the mean time, lest any unforeseen circum~ stances should prevent my continuing the pursuit, to submit to the Society some conclusions which I have already formed from the results of various experiments. Their subjects are, I. The measurement of the quantity of air discharged through an aper- ture. II. The determination of the direction and velocity of a stream of air proceeding from an orifice. III. Ocular evidence of the nature of sound. IV. The velocity of sound. V. Sonorous cavities. VI. The degree of divergence of sound. VII. The decay of sound. VIII. The harmonic sounds of pipes. IX. The vibrations of different elastic fluids. X. The analogy between light and sound. XI. The coalescence of musical sounds. XII. ' . ~ Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries, &c. 107 The frequency of vibrations constituting a given note. XIII. The vibrations of chords. XIV. The vibrations of rods and plates. XV. The human voice. XVI. The temperament of musical intervals. I. Of the Quantity of Air discharged through an Aperture. A piece of bladder was tied over the end of the tube of a large glass funnel, and punctured with a hot needle. The funnel was inverted in a vessel of water; and a gage, with a graduated glass tube, was so placed as to measure the pressure occasioned by the different levels of the surfaces of the water. As the air escaped through the puncture, it was supplied by a phial of known dimensions, at equal intervals of time; and, according to the frequency of this supply, the average height of the gage was such as is expressed in the first Table. It appears, that the quantity of air discharged by a given aperture, was nearly in the subduplicate ratio of the pressure; and that the ratio of the expenditures by different apertures, with the same pressure, lay between the ratio of their diameters and that of their areas. The second, third, and fourth Tables show the result of similar experiments, made with some variations in the apparatus. It may be inferred, from comparing the experiments on a tube with those on a simple perforation, that the expenditure is increased, as in water, by the application of a short pipe. 108 Dr. Younc’s Experiments and Inquiries Table 1. A is the area, in square inches, of an A B | C | aperture nearly circular. B, the pressure in inches. C, the number of cubic inches 00018) 25 | 3.9 |) ; ,00018] .58 | 11.7 discharged in one minute. .00018}1. 15.6 , 001 | .o45| 7.8 All numbers throughout this paper, 001 | .2 | 15.6 | where the contrary is not expressed, are (0010) 77°" 1 Bt:8 004, | .35 | 46.8 to be understood of inches, linear, square, or cubic. Table 11. A is the area of the section of a tube about two inches long. B, the pressure. .o7| 1. | 2000.} C, the quantity of air discharged in a mi- .o7| 2. | 2900.! nute, by estimation. A | B C Table 111. A B C |} D _ A is the area of the section of a 0064, | 1.15 | .2 (46.8 tube. B, its length. C, the pressure. eeey 10. 4d; \46-8 | D, the discharge in a minute. 0064 |13.5 | -35 191-2 00641135 | -7 |46.8) - Table iv. A is the area of an oval aperture, formed A | By} C by flattening a glass tube at the end: its dia~ meters were .025 and .152. _B, the pressure. C, the discharge. 003] 28. 46.8 hie respecting Sound and Light. 109 II. Of the Direction and Velocity of a Stream of Air. An apparatus was contrived for measuring, by means of a water-gage communicating with a reservoir of air, the pressure by which a current was forced from the reservoir through a cylindrical tube; and the gage was so sensible, that, a regular blast being supplied from the lungs, it showed the slight varia- tion produced by every pulsation of the heart. The current of air issuing from the tube was directed downwards, upon a white plate, on which a scale of equal parts was engraved, and which was thinly covered with a coloured liquid; the breadth of the surface of the plate laid bare was observed at different distances from the tube, and with different degrees of pressure, care being taken that the liquid should be so shallow as to yield to the slightest impression of air. The results are collected in Tables v. and vi. and are exhibited to the eye in Plate III. Figs. 1—12. In order to measure with greater certainty and precision, the velocity of every part of the current, a second cavity, fur- nished with a gage, was provided, and pieces perforated with apertures of different sizes were adapted to its orifice: the axis of the current was directed as accurately as possible to the centres of these apertures, and the result.of the experiments, with various pressures and distances, are inserted in Tables vir. vil. and 1x. The velocity of a stream being, both according to the commonly received opinion and to the experiments already related, nearly in the subduplicate ratio of the pressure occasioning it, it was inferred, that an equal pressure would be required to stop its progress, and that the velocity of the cur- rent, where it struck against the aperture, must be in the sub- duplicate ratio of the pressure marked by the gage. The ordi- 110 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries nates of the curves in Figs. 13—2 3, were therefore taken recipro- cally in the subduplicate ratio of the pressure marked by the second gage to that indicated by the first, at the various. dis- tances represented by the abscisses. Lach figure represents a different degree of pressure in the first cavity. The curve nearest the axis, is deduced from observations in which the aperture opposed to the tube was not greater than that of the tube itself; and shows what would be the diameter of the cur- rent, if the velocities of every one of its particles in the same circular section, including those of the contiguous air, which must have acquired as much motion as the current has lost, were equal among themselves. As the central particles must be supposed to be less impeded in their motion than the super- ficial ones, of course, the smaller the aperture opposed to the centre of the current, the greater the velocity ought to come out, and the ordinate of the curve the smaller; but, where the aperture was not greater than that of the tube, the difference of the velocities at the same distance was scarcely perceptible. When the aperture was larger than that of the tube, if the dis- tance was very small, of course, the average velocity came out much smaller than that which was inferred from a smaller aperture; but, where the ordinate of the internal curve became nearly equal to this aperture, there was but little difference be- tween the velocities indicated with different apertures. Indeed, in some cases, a larger aperture seemed to indicate a greater velocity: this might have arisen in some degree from the smaller aperture not having been exactly in the centre of the current; but there is greater reason to suppose, that it was occa- sioned by some resistance derived from the air returning between the sides of the aperture and the current entering it. Where respecting Sound and Lighi. 114 this took place, the external curves, which are so constructed as that their ordinates are reciprocally in the subduplicate ratio of the pressure observed in the second cavity, with apertures equal in semidiameter to their initial ordinate, approach, for a. short distance, nearer to the axis than the internal curve: after this, they continue their course very near to this curve. Hence it appears, that no observable part of the motion diverged beyond the limits of the solid which would be formed by the revolution of the internal curve, which is seldom inclined to the axis in an angle so great as ten degrees. A similar conclu- sion may be made, from observing the flame of a candle sub- jected to the action of a blowpipe: there is no divergency beyond the narrow limits of the current; the flame, on the con- trary, is every where forced by the ambient air towards the current, to supply the place-of that which it has carried away by its friction. The lateral communication of motion, very ingeniously and accurately observed in water by Professor VEN- TURI, is exactly similar to the motion here shown to take place in air; and these experiments fully justify him in rejecting the tenacity of water as its cause: no doubt it arises from the rela- tive situation of the particles of the fluid, in the line of the cur- rent, to that of the particles in the contiguous strata, which is such as naturally to lead to a communication of motion nearly in a parallel direction ; and this may properly be termed friction. The lateral pressure which urges the flame of a candle towards the stream of air from a blowpipe, is probably exactly similar to that pressure which causes the inflection of a current of air near an obstacle. Mark the dimple which a slender stream of air makes on the surface of water; bring a convex body into contact with the side of the stream, and the place of the dimple 112 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries will immediately show that the current is inflected towards the body; and, if the body be at liberty to move in every direction, it will be urged towards the current, in the same manner as, in VENTURI’s experiments, a fluid was forced up a tube inserted into the side of a pipe through which water was flowing. A similar interposition of an obstacle in the course of the wind, is probably often the cause of smoky chimneys. One circumstance was observed in these experiments, which it is extremely diffi- cult to explain, and which yet leads to very important conse- quences: it may be made distinctly perceptible to the eye, by forcing a current of smoke very gently through a fine tube. When the velocity is as small as possible, the stream proceeds for many inches without any observable dilatation; it then im- mediately diverges at a considerable angle into a cone, Plate IV. Fig. 24; and, at the point of divergency, there is an audible and even visible vibration. The blowpipe also affords a method of observing this phenomenon: as far as can be judged from the motion of the flame, the current seems to make something like a revolution in the surface of the cone, but this motion is too rapid to be distinctly discerned. When the pressure is increased, the apex of the cone approaches nearer to the orifice of the tube, Figs. 25,26; but no degree of pressure seems materially to alter its divergency. The distance of the apex from the orifice, is not proportional to the diameter of the current ; it rather appears to be the greater the smaller the current, and is much better defined in a small current than in a large one. Its distance in one ex- periment is expressed in Table x, from observations on the sur- face of a liquid; in other experiments, its respective distances were sometimes considerably less with the same degrees of pres- sure. It maybe inferred, from the numbers of Tables vii and vir, respecting Sound and Light. 113 that in several instances a greater height of the first gage pro- duced a less height of the second: this arose from the nearer approach of the apex of the cone to the orifice of the tube, the stream losing a greater portion of its velocity by this diver- gence than it gained by the increase of pressure. At first sight, the form of the current bears some resemblance to the vena contracta of a jet of water: but Venturr has observed, that in. water an increase of pressure increases, instead of diminishing, the distance of the contracted section from the orifice. Is it not possible, that the facility with which some spiders are said to project their fine threads to a great distance, may depend upon. the small degree of velocity with which they are thrown out, so that, like a minute current, meeting with little interruption from the neighbouring air, they easily continue their course for a considerable time? Table v. The diameter of the tube .o7. A is the distance of the liquid from the orifice. B, the pressure. C, the diameter of the surface of the liquid displaced. MDCCC. Q 114 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries Table vx. Table vit. Diameter of the tube, .1. { Diameter of the tube .06. A, B, and 5 : C, as in A is the distance of the op- Table v posite aperture, from the orifice of the tube. B, the diameter of the aperture. C, the pressure, indicated by the first gage. D, the height of the second gage. A B Cc el 2 “Bulk: Al > S|. 6 7, 8 wm N I 1. i, 2. 4. 8. g: 4. I | ee | ee | ee | ce | | ce | ce | a | mee | ef a | me | ee | ee 2 ee ee es Tf 305) .05 Ze We I 5] 2 +22 Ter WAc3e gol at Zig eiS 21h 30,eyua-2 Oe wlhiteye {wan ae: Asay ate a) «4 i 32 tay Olde) 6. eh Vale: Ts V0 ea 8. 2.1 8 9- 23 oN td O. 2:0. Ee ~ Diameter of the tube .1. A, B, C, and D, as in Table vir. respecting Sound and Light. 115 Table 1x. Table x. Diameter | a | BR A is the pres- of the tube |———|——| sure. B, the dis- bei o tance of the a- ‘ 3 e e ASB; C; ie Vile |P& of the cone and D, asin {1.8 | x. |from the orifice Table vir. {2° *5 of a tube .1 in + °| diameter: Il. Ocular Evidence of the Nature of Sound. A tube about the tenth of an inch in diameter, with a lateral orifice half an inch from its end, filed rather deeper than the axis of the tube, Fig. 27, was inserted at the apex of a conical cavity contaiming about twenty cubic inches of air, and luted perfectly tight: by blowing through the tube, a sound nearly in unison with the tenor C was produced. By gradually increasing the capacity of the cavity as far as several gallons, with the same mouth-piece, the sound, although faint, became more and more grave, till it was no longer a musical note. Even before this period a kind of trembling was distinguishable; and this, as the cavity was still further increased, was changed into a succession of distinct pufis, like the sound produced by an explosion of air from the lips; as slow, in some instances, as 4, or 3inasecond. These were undoubtedly the single vibra- tions, which, when repeated with sufficient frequency, impress on the auditory nerve the sensation of a continued sound. On forcing a current of smoke through the tube, the vibratory motion of the stream, as it passed out at the lateral orifice, was evident to the eye; although, from various circumstances, the quantity and direction of its motion could not be subjected to Q2 116 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries exact mensuration. ‘This species of sonorous cavity seems susceptible of but few harmonic sounds. It was observed, that a faint blast produced a much greater frequency of vibrations than that which was appropriate to the cavity : a circumstance similar to this obtains also in large organ pipes; but, several minute observations of this kind, although they might assist in forming a theory of the origin of vibrations, or in confirming such a theory drawn from other sources, yet, as they are not alone sufficient to afford any general conclusions, are omitted at present, for the sake of brevity. IV. Of the Velocity of Sound. It has been demonstrated, by M. DE La GRANGE and others, that any impression whatever communicated to one particle of an elastic fluid, will be transmitted through that fluid with an uniform velocity, depending on the constitution of the fluid, without reference to any supposed laws of the continuation of that impression. Their theorem for ascertaining this velocity is the same as Newton has deduced from the hypothesis of a par- ticular law of continuation: but it must be confessed, that the result differs somewhat too widely from experiment, to give us full confidence in the perfection of the theory. Corrected by the experiments of various observers, the velocity of any impres- sion transmitted by the common air, may, at an average, be reckoned 11930 feet in a second. V. Of sonorous Cavities. M. De La GRANGE has also demonstrated, that all impres- sions are reflected by an obstacle terminating an elastic fluid, with the same velocity with which they arrived at that obstacle. respecting Sound and Light. 117 When the walls of a passage, or of an unfurnished room, are smooth and perfectly parallely any explosion, or a stamping with the foot, communicates an impression to the air, which is reflected from one wall to the other, and from the second again towards the ear, nearly in the same direction with the primitive impulse: this takes place as frequently in a second, as double the breadth of the passage is contained in 1130 feet; and the ear receives a perception of a musical sound, thus determined in its pitch by the breadth of the passage. On making the expe- riment, the result will be found accurately to agree with this explanation. If the sound is predetermined, and the frequency of vibrations such as that each pulse, when doubly reflected, may coincide with the subsequent pulse proceeding directly from the sounding body, the intensity of the sound will be much increased by the reflection ; and also, in a less degree, if the reflected pulse coincides with the next but one, the next but two, or more, of the direct pulses. The appropriate notes of a room may readily be discovered by singing the scale in it; and they will be found to depend on the proportion of its length or breadth to 1190 feet. The sound of the stopped diapason pipes of an organ is produced in a manner somewhat similar to the note from an explosion in a passage; and that of its reed pipes to the resonance of the voice in a room: the length of the pipe in one case determining the sound, in the other, increasing its strength. The frequency of the vibrations does not at all imme- diately depend on the diameter of the pipe. It must be con- fessed, that much remains to be done in explaining the precise manner in which the vibration of the air in an organ pipe is generated. M. Danis, BeRNoUuLLt has solved several difficult 118 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries problems relating to the subject ; yet some of his assumptions are not only gratuitous, but contrary to matter of fact. VI. Of the Divergence of Sound. It has been generally asserted, chiefly on the authority of Newton, that if any sound be admitted through an aperture into a chamber, it will diverge from that aperture equally in all directions. The chief arguments in favour of this opinion are deduced from considering the phenomena of the pressure of fluids, and the moticn of waves excited in a pool of water. But the inference seems to be too hastily drawn: there is a very material difference between impulse and pressure; and, in the case of waves of water, the moving force at each point is the power of gravity, which, acting primarily in a perpendicular direction, is only secondarily converted into a horizontal force, in the direction of the progress of the waves, being at each step disposed to spread equally in every direction: but the impulse transmitted by an elastic fluid, acts primarily in the direction of its progress. It is well known, that if a person calls to another with a speaking trumpet, he points it towards the place where his hearer stands: and I am assured by a very respectable Member of the Royal Society, that the report of a cannon appears many times louder to a person towards whom it is fired, than to one placed im a contrary direction. It must have occurred to every one’s observation, that a sound such as that of a mill, or a fall of water, has appeared much louder after turning a corner, when the house or other obstacle no longer intervened; and it has been already remarked by EuLeEr, on this head, that we are not acquainted with any substance perfectly respecting Sound and Light. 119 impervious to sound. Indeed, as M. Lampert has very truly asserted, the whole. theory of the speaking trumpet, supported as it is by practical experience, would fall to the ground, if it were demonstrable that sound spreads equally in every direc- tion. In windy weather it may often be observed, that the sound of a distant bell varies almost instantaneously in its strength, so as to appear at least twice as remote at one time as at another; an observation which has also occurred to another gentleman, who is uncommonly accurate in examining the phenomena of nature. Now, if sound diverged equally in all directions, the variation produced by the wind could never exceed one-tenth of the apparent distance: but, on the suppo- sition of a motion nearly rectilinear, it may easily happen that a slight change in the direction of the wind, may convey the sound, either directly or after reflection, in very different de- grees of strength, to the same spot. From the experiments on the motion of a current of air, already related, it would be expected that a sound, admitted at a considerable distance from its origin through an aperture, would proceed, with an almost imperceptible increase of divergence, in the same direction ; for, the actual velocity of the particles of air, in the strongest sound, is incomparably less than that of the slowest of the currents in the experiments related, where the beginning of the conical divergence took place at the greatest distance. Dr. MATTHEW Younc has objected, not without reason, to M. Huss, that the existence of a condensation will cause a divergence in sound: but a much greater degree of condensation must have existed in the currents described than in any sound. There is indeed one difference between a stream of air and a sound; that, in sound, the motions of different particles of air are not synchro- 120 Dr. Younc’s Experiments and Inquiries nous: but it is not demonstrable that this circumstance would affect the divergency of the motion, except at the instant of its commencement, and perhaps not even then in a material degree; for, in general, the motion is communicated with a very gradual increase of intensity. The subject, however, deserves a more particular investigation; and, in order to obtain a more solid foundation for the argument, it is proposed, as soon as circumstances permit, to institute a course of experi- ments for ascertaining, as accurately as possible, the different strength of a sound once projected in a given direction, at dif- ferent distances from the axis of its motion. VII. Of the Decay of Sound. Various opinions have been entertained respecting the decay of sound. M. De 1a GranceE has published a calculation, by which its force is shown to decay nearly in the simple ratio of the distances; and M. Dantet BERNOULLI’s equations for the sounds of conical pipes lead to a similar. conclusion. The same inference would follow from a completion of the reasoning of Dr. Hetsuam, Dr. MattTuEew Younc, and Professor VENTURI. It has been very elegantly demonstrated by Macraurin, and may also be proved in a much more simple manner, that when motion is communicated through a series of elastic bodies increasing in magnitude, if the number of bodies be supposed infinitely great, and their difference infinitely small, the motion of the last will be to that of the’first in the subduplicate ratio of their respective magnitudes ; and since, in the case of concentric spherical laminze of air, the bulk increases in the duplicate ratio ‘of the distance, the motion will in this case be directly, and the velocity inversely, as the distance. But, however true this may respecting Sound and Light. 121 be of the first impulse, it will appear, by pursuing the calcula- tion a little further, that every one of the elastic bodies, except the last, receives an impulse in a retrograde direction, which ultimately impedes the effect of the succeeding impulse, as much as a similar cause promoted that of the preceding one: and thus, as sound must be conceived to consist of an infinite number of impulses, the motion of the last lamina will be pre- cisely equal to that of the first; and, as far as this mode of reasoning goes, sound must decay in the duplicate ratio of the distance. Hence it appears, that the proposal for adopting the logarithmic curve for the form of the speaking trumpet, was ’ founded on fallacious reasoning. The calculation of M. De va GRANGE is left for future examination; and it is intended, in the mean time, to attempt to ascertain the decay of sound as nearly as possible by experiment: should the result favour the con- clusions from that calculation, it would establish a marked difference between the propagation of sound and of light. VIII. Of the harmonic Sounds of Pipes. In order to ascertain the velocity with which organ pipes of different lengths require to be supplied with air, according to the various appropriate sounds which they produce, a set of experiments was made, with the same mouth-piece, on pipes of the same bore, and of different lengths, both stopped and open. The general result was, that a similar blast produced as nearly the same sound as the length of the pipes would permit; or at least that the exceptions, though very numerous, lay equally on each side of this conclusion. The particular results are expressed in Table x1. and in Plate IV. Fig. 28. They ex- plain how a note may be made much louder on a wind instrument MDCCC. R 122 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries by aswell, than it can possibly be by a sudden impression of the blast. It is proposed, at a future time, to ascertain by experiment, the actual compression of the air within the pipe under different. circumstances: from some very slight trials, it seemed to be nearly in the ratio of the frequency of vibrations of each harmonic. respecting Sound and Light. | 123 Table x1. STOPPED. 0.3 | 1.8 1.2] 1.7 |10.0 A, is the length of the pipe from the lateral orifice to the end. C, the pressure at which the sound began. B, its termination, by lessening the pressure; D, by increasing it. E, the note answering to the first sound of each pipe, according to the German method of notation. F, the number showing the place of each note in the regular series Of harmonics. The diameter of the pipe was .35; the air duct of the mouth- piece measured, where smallest, .25 by .035; the lateral orifice .25 by .125. The ap- paratus was not calculated to apply a pressure of above 22 inches. Where no number stands under C, a sudden blast was bac to produce the note. 2 124, Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries IX. Of the Vibrations of different elastic Fluids. All the methods of finding the velocity of sound, agree in determining it to be, in fluids of a given elasticity, reciprocally in the subduplicate ratio of the density: hence, in pure hydro- gen gas it should be 13 = 9.6 times as great as in common air; and the pitch of a pipe should be a minor fourteenth higher in this fluid than in the common air. It is therefore probable that. the hydrogen gas used in Professor CHLApN?’s late experiments, was not quite pure. It must be observed, that in an accurate experiment of this nature, the pressure causing the blast ought ‘to be carefully ascertained. There can be no doubt but that, in the observations of the French Academicians on the velocity of sound, which appear to have been conducted with all possible attention, the dampness and coldness of the night air must have considerably increased its density: hence, the velocity was found to be only 1109 feet in a second; while DERHAm’s experiments, which have an equal appearance of accuracy, make it amount to 1142. Perhaps the average may, as has been already mentioned, be safely estimated at 1130. It may here be remarked, that the well known elevation of the pitch of wind instruments, in the course of playing, sometimes amounting to half a note, is not, as is commonly supposed, owing to any expansion of the instrument, for this should produce a contrary effect, but to the increased warmth of the air in the tube. Dr. Smit has made a similar observation, on the pitch of an organ in summer and winter, which he found to differ more than twice as much as thie English and French experiments on the velocity of sound. Brancont found the velocity of sound, at Bologna, to differ at iiflerent times, in the ratio of 152 to 157. respecting Sound and Light. 125 X. Of the Analogy between Light and Sound. Ever since the publication of Sir Isaac Newrton’s incom- parable writings, his doctrines of the emanation of particles of light from lucid substances, and of the formal pre-existence of coloured rays in white light, have been almost universally admitted in this country, and but little opposed in others. LEONARD EULER indeed, in several of his works, has advanced some powerful objections against them, but not sufficiently powerful to justify the dogmatical reprobation with which he treats them; and he has left that system of an ethereal vibra- tion, which after HuyceENs and some others he adopted, equally liable to be attacked on many weak sides. Without pretending to decide positively on the controversy, it is conceived that some considerations may be brought forwards, which may tend to diminish the weight of objections to a theory similar to the Huycenian. There are also one or two difficulties in the New- TONIAN system, which have been little observed. ‘The first is, the uniform velocity with which light is supposed to be pro- jected from all lummous bodies, in consequence of heat, or otherwise. How happens it that, whether the projecting force is the slightest transmission of electricity, the friction of two pebbles, the lowest degree of visible ignition, the white heat of _ a wind furnace, or the intense heat of the sun itself, these won- derful corpuscles are always propelled with one uniform velo- city? For, if they differed in velocity, that difference ought to produce a different refraction. But a still more insuperable difficulty seems to occur, in the partial reflection from every refracting surface. Why, of the same kind of rays, in every cir- cumstance precisely similar, some should always be reflected, 126 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries and others transmitted, appears in this system to be wholly inexplicable. That a medium resembling, in many properties, that which has been denominated ether, does really exist, is undeniably proved by the phzenomena of electricity ; and the ar- guments against the existence of such an ether throughout the universe, have been pretty sufficiently answered by Euter. The rapid transmission of the electrical shock, shows that the electric medium is possessed of an elasticity as great as is neces- sary to be supposed for the propagation of light. Whether the electric ether is to be considered as the same with the luminous ether, if such a fluid exists, may perhaps at some future time be discovered by experiment; hitherto I have not been able to observe that the refractive power of a fluid undergoes any change by electricity. The uniformity of the motion of light in the same medium, which is a difficulty in the NEwron1an theory, favours the admission of the HuyGEn1ay; as all impres- sions are known to be transmitted through an elastic fluid with the same velocity. It has been already shown, that souhd, in all probability, has very little tendency to diverge: in a medium so highly elastic as the luminous ether must be supposed to be, the tendency to diverge may be considered as infinitely small, and the grand objection to the system of vibration will be removed. It is not absolutely certain, that the white line visible in all directions on the edge of a knife, in the experiments of NewtTon and of Mr. Jorpan, was not partly occasioned by the tendency of light to diverge. EuLER’s hypothesis, of the trans- mission of light by an agitation of the particles of the refract- ing media themselves, is liable to strong objections; according to this supposition, the refraction of the rays of light, on entering the atmosphere from the pure ether which he describes, ought _ respecting Sound and Light. 127 to be a million times greater than it is. For explaining the phaenomena of partial and total reflection, refraction, and inflec- tion, nothing more is necessary than to suppose all refracting media to retain, by their attraction, a greater or less quantity of the luminous ether, so as to make its density greater than that which it possesses in a vacuum, without increasing its elasti- city; and that light is a propagation of an impulse communi- cated to this ether by luminous bodies: whether this impulse is produced by a partial emanation of the ether, or by vibrations of the particles of the body, and whether these vibrations are, as EuLER supposed, of various and irregular magnitudes, or whether they are uniform, and comparatively large, remains to be hereafter determined. Now, as the direction of an impulse transmitted through a fluid, depends on that of the particles in synchronous motion, to which it is always perpendicular, what- ever alters the direction of the pulse, will inflect the ray of light. If'a smaller elastic body strike against a larger one, it is well known that the smaller is reflected more or less powerfully, according to the difference of their magnitudes: thus, there is always a reflection when the rays of light pass from a rarer to a denser stratum of ether; and frequently an echo when a sound strikes against a cloud. A greater body striking a smaller one, propels it, without losing all its motion: thus, the particles of a denser stratum of ether, do not impart the whole of their motion to a rarer, but, in their effort to proceed, they are recalled by the attraction of the refracting substance with equal force; and thus a reflection is always secondarily produced, when the rays of light pass from a denser to a rarer stratum. Let AB, Plate V. Fig. 29, be a ray of light falling on the reflecting surface FG; ed the direction of the vibration, pulse, impression, or conden- 128 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries sation. When d comes to H, the impression will be, éither wholly or partly, reflected with the same velocity as it arrived, and EH will be equal to DH; the angle EIH to DIH or CIF; and the angle of reflection to that of incidence. Let FG, Fig. 30, be a refracting surface. The portion of the pulse LE, which is travelling through the refracting medium, will move with a greater or less velocity in the subduplicate ratio of the densities, and HE will be to KI in that ratio. But HE is, to the radius IH, the sine of the angle of refraction; and KI that of the angle of incidence. ‘This explanation of refraction is nearly the same as that of Euter. ‘The total reflection of a ray of light by a refracting surface, is explicable in the same manner as its simple refraction; HE, Fig. 31, being so much longer than KI, that the ray first becomes parallel to FG, and then, having to return through an equal diversity of media, is reflected in an equal angle. When a ray of light passes near an inflecting body, surrounded, as all bodies are supposed to be, with an atmo- sphere of ether denser than the ether of the ambient air, the part of the ray nearest the body is retarded, and of course the whole ray inflected towards the body, Fig. 32. The repulsion of | inflected rays has been very ably controverted by Mr. Jorpan, the ingenious author of a late publication on the Inflection of Light. It has already been conjectured by Evier, that the colours of light consist in the different frequency of the vibra- tions of the luminous ether: it does not appear that he has sup- ported this opinion by any argument; but it is strongly con- firmed, by the analogy between the colours of a thin plate and the sounds of a series of organ pipes. The phanomena of the colours of thin plates require, in the NEwron1rAn system, a very complicated supposition, of an ether, anticipating by its respecting Sound and Light. 129 motion the velocity of the corpuscles of light, and thus pro- ducing the fits of transmission and reflection; and even this supposition does not much assist the explanation. It appears, from the accurate analysis of the phenomena which Newton has given, and which has by no means been superseded by any later observations, that the same colour recurs whenever the thickness answers to the terms of an arithmetical progres- sion. Now this is precisely similar to the production of the same sound, by means of an uniform blast, from organ-pipes which are different multiples of the same length. Supposing white light to be a continued impulse or stream of luminous ether, it may be conceived to act on the plates as a blast of air does on the organ-pipes, and to produce vibrations regulated in fre- quency by the length of the lines which are terminated by the two refracting surfaces. It may be objected that, to complete the analogy, there should be tubes, to answer to the organ- pipes: but the tube of an organ-pipe is only necessary to pre- vent the divergence of the impression, and in light there is little or no tendency to diverge; and indeed, in the case of a resonant , passage, the air is not prevented from becoming sonorous by the liberty of lateral motion. It would seem, that the determination of a portion of the track of a ray of light through any homo- geneous stratum of ether, is sufficient to establish a length as a basis for colorific vibrations. In inflections, the length of the track of a ray of light through the inflecting atmosphere may determine its vibrations: but, in this case, as it is probable that there is a reflection from every part of the surface of the sur- rounding atmosphere, contributing to the appearance of the white line in every direction, in the experiments already men- tioned, so it is possible that there may be some second reflection MDCCC. S 130 Dr. Younc’s Experiments and Inquiries at the immediate surface of the body itself, and that, by mutual reflections between these two surfaces, something like the anguiform motion suspected by NewTon may really take place; and then the analogy to the colours of thin plates will be still stronger. A mixture of vibrations, of all possible frequencies, may easily destroy the peculiar nature of each, and concur in a general effect of white light. The greatest difficulty in this sys- tem is, to explain the different degree of refraction of differently coloured light, and the separation of white light in refraction : yet, considering how imperfect the theory of elastic fluids still remains, it cannot be expected that every circumstance should at once be clearly elucidated. It may hereafter be considered how far the excellent experiments of Count RumForp, which tend very greatly to weaken the evidence of the modern doc- trine of heat, may be more or less favourable to one or the other system of light and colours. It does not appear that any com- parative experiments have been made on the inflection of light by substances possessed of different refractive powers; un- doubtedly some very interesting conclusions might be expected from the inquiry. XI. Of the Coalescence of musical Sounds. It is surprising that so great a mathematician as Dr. SMITH could have entertained for a moment, an idea that the vibrations constituting different sounds should be able to cross each other in all directions, without affecting the same individual particles of air by their joint forces: undoubtedly they cross, without disturbing each other’s progress; but this can be no otherwise effected than by each particle’s partaking of both motions. — If this assertion stood in need of any proof, it might be amply respecting Sound and Light. 131 furnished by the phenomena of beats, and of the grave har- monics observed by Romieu and Tartin1; which M. De La GRrancE has already considered in the same point of view. In the first place, to simplify the statement, let us suppose, what probably never precisely happens, that the particles of air, in transmitting the pulses, proceed and return with uniform mo- tions; and, in order to represent their position to the eye, let the uniform progress of time be represented by the increase of the absciss, and the distance of the particle from its original position, by the ordinate, Fig. 3338. Then, by supposing any two or more vibrations in the same direction to be com- bined, the joint motion will be represented by the sum or dif- ference of the ordinates. When two sounds are of equal strength, and nearly of the same pitch, as in Fig. 36, the joint vibration is alternately very weak and very strong, producing the effect denominated a beat, Plate VI. Fig. 43, B and C; which is slower and more marked, as the sounds approach nearer to each other in frequency of vibrations ; and, of these beats there may happen to be several orders, according to the periodical approximations of the numbers expressing the proportions of the vibrations. The strength of the joint sound is double that of the simple sound only at the middle of the beat, but not throughout its duration; and it may be inferred, that the strength of sound in a concert will not be in exact proportion to the number of instruments composing it. Could any method be devised for ascertaining this by experiment, it would assist in the comparison of sound with light. In Plate V. Fig. 33, let P and Q be the middle points of the progress or regress of a particle in two successive compound vibrations; then, CP being = PD, KR = RN, GQ = QH, and MS = SO, twice their distance, 2RS = 2RN + Se 132 Dr. Younc’s Experiments and Inquiries 2NM + 2MS=KN + NM+NM + MO= KM + NO, is equal to the sum of the distances of the corresponding parts of the simple vibrations. For instance, if the two sounds be as 80: 81, the joint vibration will be as 80.5; the arithmetical mean between the periods of the single vibrations. The greater the difference in the pitch of two sounds, the more rapid the beats, till at last, like the distinct puffs of air in the expe- riments already related, they communicate the idea of a conti- nued sound; and this is the fundamental harmonic described by Tartini. For instance, in Plate V. Fig. 34—37, the vibra- tions of sounds related as 1:2, 4:5, 9:10, and 5: 8, are represented ; where the beats, if the sounds be not taken too grave, constitute a distinct sound, which corresponds with the time elapsing between two successive coincidences, or near approaches to coincidence: for, that such a tempered interval still produces a harmonic, appears from Plate V. Fig. 38. But, besides this primary harmonic, a secondary note is sometimes heard, where the intermediate compound vibrations occur at a certain interval, though interruptedly ; for instance, in the coa- lescence of two sounds related to each other as 7 : 8, 5: 7, or 4: §, there is a recurrence of a similar state of the joint motion, nearly at the interval of ,, 4, or 3 of the whole period: hence, in the concord of a major third, the fourth below the key note is heard as distinctly as the double octave, as is seen in some degree in Plate V. Fig. 35; AB being nearly two-thirds of CD. The same sound is sometimes produced by taking the minor sixth below the key note; probably because this sixth, like every other note, is almost always attended by an octave, as a harmo- nic. If the angles of all the figures resulting from the motion thus assumed be rounded off, they will approach more nearly respecting Sound and Light. 133 to a representation of the actual circumstances; but, as the laws by which the motion of the particles of air is regulated, differ according to the different origin and nature of the sound, it is impossible to adapt a demonstration to them all = if, however, the particles be supposed to follow the law of the harmonic curve, derived from uniform circular motion, the compound vibration will be the harmonic instead of the arithmetical mean; and the secondary sound of the interrupted vibrations will be more accurately formed, and more strongly marked, Plate VI. Figs. 41, 42: the demonstration is deducible from the pro- perties of the circle. It is remarkable, that the law by which the motion of the particles is governed, is capable of some singular alterations by a combination of vibrations. By adding toa given sound other similar sounds, related to it in frequency as the series of odd numbers, and in strength inversely in the same ratios, the right lines indicating an uniform motion may be con- verted very nearly into figures of sines, and the figures of sines into right lines, as in Plate V. Figs. 39, 40. XII. Of the Frequency of Vibrations constituting a given Note. ) The number of vibrations performed by a given sound in a second, has been variously ascertained; first, by SavveEuR, by a very ingenious inference from the beats of two sounds; and since, by the same observer and several others, by calculation from the weight and tension of a chord. It was thought worth while, as a confirmation, to make an experiment suggested, but coarsely conducted, by MERsENNUuS, on a chord 200 inches in length, stretched so loosely as to have its single vibrations visible ; and, by holding a quill nearly in contact with the chord, 134 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries they were made audible, and were found, in one experiment, to recur 8.3 times in a second. By lightly pressing the chord at one-eighth of its length from the end, and at other shorter ali- quot distances, the fundamental note was found to be one-sixth of a tone higher than the respective octave of a tuning-fork marked C: hence, the fork was a comma and a half above the pitch assumed by Sauveur, of an imaginary C, consisting of one vibration in a second. XIN. Of the Vibrations of Chords. By a singular oversight in the demonstration of Dr. Brook T'ayor, adopted as it has been by a number of later authors, it is asserted, that if a chord be once inflected into any other form than that of the harmonic curve, it will, since those parts which are without this figure are impelled towards it by an excess of force, and those within it by a deficiency, in a very short time arrive at or very near the form of this precise curve. It would be easy to prove, if this reasoning were allowed, that the form of the curve can be no other than that of the axis, since the tending force is continually impelling the chord to- wards this line. The case is very similar to that of the NEw- TONIAN proposition respecting sound. It may be proved, that every impulse is communicated along a tended chord with an uniform velocity; and this velocity is the same which is inferred from Dr. TayLor’s theorem; just as that of sound, determined by other methods, coincides with the NEwronian result. But, although several late mathematicians have given admirable solutions of all possible cases of the problem, yet it has still. been supposed, that the distinctions were too minute to be actu- ally observed; especially, as it might have been added, since respecting Sound and Light. 135 the inflexibility of a wire would dispose it, according to the doc- trine of elastic rods, to assume the form of the harmonic curve. The theorem of EULER and DE LA GRANGE, in the case where the chord is supposed to be at first at rest, is in effect this: con- tinue the figure each way, alternately on different sides of the axis, and in contrary positions; then, from any point of the curve, take an absciss each way, in the same proportion to the length of the chord as any given portion of time bears to the time of one semivibration, and the half sum of the ordinates will be the distance of that point of the chord from the axis, at the expira- tion of the time given. If the initial figure of the chord be com- posed of two right lines, as generally happens in musical instruments and experiments, its successive forms will be such as are represented in Plate VI. Figs. 47, 48: and this result is fully confirmed by experiment. Take one of the lowest strings of a square piano forte, round which a fine silvered wire is wound in a spiral form; contract the light of a window, so that, when the eye is placed in a proper position, the image of the light may appear small, bright, and well defined, on each of the convolu- tions of the wire. Let the chord be now made to vibrate, and the luminous point will delineate its path, like a burning coal whirled round, and will present to the eye a line of light, which, by the assistance of a microscope, may be very accurately ob- served. According to the different ways by which the wire is put in motion, the form of this path is no less diversified and amusing, than the multifarious forms of the quiescent lines of vibrating plates, discovered by Professor CHLADNI; and is indeed in one respect even more interesting, as it appears to be more within the reach of mathematical calculation to determine it; although hitherto, excepting some slight observations of Busse 136 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries and CHLApnI, principally on the motion of rods, nothing has been attempted on the subject. For the present purpose, the motion of the chord may be simplified, by tying a long fine thread to any part of it, and fixing this thread in a direction perpendicular to that of the chord, without drawing it so tight as to increase the tension: by these means, the vibra- tions are confined nearly to one plane, which scarcely ever happens when the chord vibrates at liberty. If the chord be now inflected in the middle, it will be found, by comparison with an object which marked its quiescent position, to make equal excursions on each side of the axis; and the figure which it apparently occupies will be terminated by two lines, the more luminous as they are nearer the ends, Plate VI. Fig. 49. But, if the chord be inflected near one of its extremities, Fig. 50, it will proceed but a very small distance on the opposite side of the axis, and will there form a very bright line, indicating its longer continuance in that place; yet it will return on the former side nearly to the point from whence it was let go, but will be there very faintly visible, on account of its short delay. In the middle of the chord, the excursions on each side the axis are always equal; and, beyond the middle, the same circum- stances take place as in the half where it was inflected, but on the opposite side of the axis; and this appearance continues unaltered in its proportions, as long as the chord vibrates at all: fully confirming the non-existence of the harmonic curve, and the accuracy of the construction of EuLEr and DE LA GRANGE. At the same time, as M. BERNovuLLt has justly observed, since every figure may be infinitely approximated, by considering its ordinates as composed of the ordinates of an infinite number of trochoids of different magnitudes, it may be demonstrated, that respecting Sound and Light. 137 all these constituent curves would revert to their initial state, in the same time that a similar chord bent into a trochoidal curve would perform a single vibration ; and this is in some respects a convenient and compendious method of considering the pro- blem. But, when a chord vibrates freely, it never remains long in motion, without a very evident departure from the plane of the vibration; and, whether from the original obliquity of the impulse, or from an interference with the reflected vibrations of the air, or from the inequability of its own weight or flexibility, or from the immediate resistance of the particles of air in con- tact with it, it is thrown into a very evident rotatory motion, more or less simple and uniform according to circumstances. ‘Some specimens of the figures of the orbits of chords are exhibited in Plate VI. Fig. 44. At the middle of the chord, its orbit has always two equal halves, but seldom at any other point. The curves of Fig. 46, are described by combining together various circular motions, supposed to be performed in aliquot parts of the primitive orbit: and some of them approach nearly to the figures actually observed. When the chord is of unequal thickness, or when it is loosely tended and forcibly inflected, the apsides and double points of the orbits have a very evident rotatory motion. The compound rotations seem to demonstrate to the eye the existence of secondary vibrations, and to account for the acute harmonic sounds which generally attend the fundamental sound. There is one fact respecting these secondary notes, which seems intirely to have escaped observation. Ifa chord be inflected at one-half, one-third, or any other aliquot part of its length, and then suddenly left at liberty, the harmonic note which would be produced by divid- ing the chord at that point is intirely lost, and is not to be dise MDCCCc. T 138 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries tinguished during any part of the continuance of the sound. This demonstrates, that the secondary notes do not depend upon any interference of the vibrations of the air with each other, nor upon any sympathetic agitation of auditory fibres, nor upon any effect of reflected sound upon the chord, but merely upon its initial figure and motion. If it were supposed that the chord, when inflected into right lines, resolved itself necessarily into a number of secondary vibrations, according to some curves which, when properly combined, would approxi- mate to the figure given, the supposition would indeed in some respects correspond with the phenomenon related; as the coef- ficients of all the curves supposed to end at the angle of inflec- tion would vanish. But, whether we trace the constituent curves of such a figure through the various stages of their vibrations, or whether we follow the more compendious method of EuLER to the same purpose, the figures resulting from this series of vibrations are in fact so simple, that it seems inconceivable how the ear should deduce the complicated idea of a number of heterogeneous vibrations, from a motion of the particles of air which must be extremely regular, and almost uniform; an uni- formity which, when proper precautions are taken, is not con- tradicted by examining the motion of the chord with the assist ance of a powerful magnifier. This difficulty occurred very strongly to Euter ; and De La GRANGE even suspects some fallacy in the experiment, and that a musical ear judges from previous association. But, besides that these sounds are disco- verable to an ear destitute of such associations, and, when the sound is produced by two strings in imperfect unison, may be verified by counting the number of their beats, the experi+ ment already related is an undeniable proof that no fallacy respecting Sound and Light. 139 of this kind exists. It must be confessed, that nothing fully satisfactory has yet occurred to account for the phenomena; but it is highly probable that the slight increase of tension pro- duced by flexure, which is omitted in the calculations, and the unavoidable inequality of thickness or flexibility of different parts of the same chord, may, by disturbing the isochronism of the subordinate vibrations, cause all that variety of sounds which is so inexplicable without them. For, when the slightest difference is introduced in the periods, there is no difficulty in conceiving how the sounds may be distinguished; and indeed, in some cases, a nice ear will discover a slight imperfection in the tune of harmonic notes: it is also often observed, in tuning an instrument, that some of the single chords produce beating sounds, which undoubtedly arise from their want of perfect uniformity. It may be perceived that any particular harmonic is loudest, when the chord is inflected at about one-third of the corresponding aliquot part from one of the extremities of that part. An observation of Dr. Watts seems to have passed unnoticed by later writers on harmonics. If the string of a violin be struck in the middle, or at any other aliquot part, it will give either no sound atall, or a very obscure one. This is true, not of inflection, but of the motion communicated by a bow; and may be explained from the circumstance of the successive impulses, reflected from the fixed points at each end, destroy- ing each other: an explanation nearly analogous to some observations of Dr. MattHEw Younc on the motion of chords. When the bow is applied not exactly at the aliquot point, but very near it, the corresponding harmonic is extremely loud; and the fundamental note, especially in the lowest harmonics, scarcely audible: the chord assumes the appearance, at the Te 14,0 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries aliquot points, of as many lucid lines as correspond to the) number of the harmonic, more nearly approaching to each other as the bow approaches more nearly to the point, Plate VI. Fig. 51. According to the various modes of applying the bow, an immense variety of figures of the orbits are produced, Fig. 45, more than enough to account for all the difference of tone in different performers. In observations of this kind, a series of harmonics is frequently heard in drawing the bow across the same part of the chord: these are produced by the: bow ; they are however not proportionate to the whole length of the bow, but depend on the capability of the portion of the bowstring, intercepted between its end and the chord, of per- forming its vibrations in times which are aliquot parts of the vibration of the chord: hence it would seem, that the bow takes effect on the chord but at one instant during each fundamental vibration. In these experiments, the bow was strung with the second string of a violin: and, in the preparatory application of resin, the longitudinal sound of CHLapNI was sometimes heard; but it was observed to differ at least a note in different parts of the string. XIV. Of the Vibrations of Rods and Plates. Some experiments were made, with the assistance of a most excellent practical musician, on the various notes produced by a glass tube, an iron rod, and a wooden ruler; and, in a case where the tube was as much at liberty as possible, all the har- monics corresponding to the numbers from 1 to 1g, were dis- -tinctly observed; several of them at the same time, and others by means of different blows. This result seems to differ from the calculations of Eurer and Count Riccats, confirmed as —s respecting Sound and Light. 141 they are by the repeated experiments of Professor CHLADNI; it is not therefore brought forward as sufficiently controverting those calculations, but as showing the necessity of a revision of the experiments. Scarcely any note could ever be heard when a rod was loosely held at its extremity; nor when it was held in the middle, and struck one-seventh of the length from one end. The very ingenious method of Professor CHLADNI, of observing the vibrations of plates by strewing fine sand over them, and discovering the quiescent lines by the figures into which it is thrown, has hitherto been little known in this country: his treatise on the phenomena is so complete, that no other experiments of the kind were thought necessary. Glass vessels of various descriptions, whether made to sound by per- cussion or friction, were found to be almost intirely free from harmonic notes; and this observation coincides with the expe- riments of CHLADNI. XV. Of the human Voice. The human voice, which was the object originally proposed to be illustrated by these researches, is of so complicated a nature, and so imperfectly understood, that it can be on this occasion but superficially considered. No person, unless we except M. FrEr- REIN, has published any thing very important on the subject of the formation of the voice, before or since DoparT; his reason- ing has fully shown the analogy between the voice and the voir humame and regal organ-pipes: but his comparison with the whistle is unfortunate; nor is he more happy in his account of the falsetto. A kind of experimental analysis of the voice may be thus exhibited. By drawing in the breath, and at the same time properly contracting the larynx, a slow vibration of the ligaments of the glottis may be produced, making a distinct clicking sound: 142 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries upon increasing the tension, and the velocity of the breath, this clicking is lost, and the sound becomes continuous, but of an extremely grave pitch: it may, by a good ear, be distinguished two octaves below the lowest A of a common bass voice, con- sisting in that case of about 26 vibrations in a second. The same sound may be raised nearly to the pitch of the common voice; but itis never smooth and clear, except perhaps in some of those persons called ventriloquists. When the pitch is raised still higher, the upper orifice of the larynx, formed by the summits of the arytenoid cartilages and the epiglottis, seems to succeed to the office of the ligaments of the glottis, and to pro- duce a retrograde falsetto, which is capable of a very great degree of acuteness. The same difference probably takes place between the natural voice and the common falsetto: the rimula glottidis being too long to admit of a sufficient degree of tension for very acute sounds, the upper orifice of the larynx supplies its place; hence, taking a note within the compass of either voice, it may be held, with the same expanse of air, two or three times as long in a falsetto as in a natural voice; hence, too, the difficulty of passing smoothly from the one voice to the other. It has been remarked, that the larynx is always elevated when the sound is acute: but this elevation is only necessary in rapid transitions, as ina shake; and then probably because, by the contraction of the capacity of the trachea, an increase of the pressure of the breath can be more rapidly effected this way, than by the action of the abdominal muscles alone. The reflec- tion of the sound thus produced from the various parts of the cavity of the mouth and nostrils, mixing at various intervals with the portions of the vibrations directly proceeding from the larynx, must, according to the temporary form of the parts, variously affect the laws of the motion of the air in each vibra- respecting Sound and Light. 143 tion, or, according to EuLer’s expression, the equation of the curve conceived to correspond with this motion, and thus produce the various characters of the vowels and semi-vowels. The principal sounding board seems to be the bony palate: the nose, except in nasal letters, affords but little resonance; for the nasal passage may be closed, by applying the finger to the soft palate, without much altering the sound of vowels not nasal. A good ear may distinctly ebserve, especially in a loud bass voice, besides the fundamental note, at least four harmonic sounds, in the order of the natural numbers; and, the more reedy the tone of the voice, the more easily they are heard. Faint as they are, their origin is by no means easy to be ex- plained. This observation is precisely confirmed, in a late dis- sertation of M. Knrcur, published in the musical newspaper of Leipsic. Perhaps, by a close attention to the harmonics entering mto the constitution of various sounds, more may be done in their analysis than could otherwise be expected. XVI. Of the Temperament of musical Intervals. It would have been extremely convenient for practical musi- cians, and would have saved many warm controversies. among; theoretical ones, if three times the ratio of 4, to 5, or four times that of 5 to 6, had been equal to the ratio of 1 tog. As it hap- pens to be otherwise, it has been much disputed in what inter- vals the imperfection should be placed. The ArisToxENIANs and PyTHAGOREANS were in some sense the beginners of the controversy. SAuVEuR has given very comprehensive tables of a great number of systems of temperament; and his own now ranks among the many that are rejected. Dr. Situ has written a large and obscure volume, which, for every purpose but for 144, Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries the use of an impracticable instrument, leaves the whole subject precisely where it found it. KrrnBERGER, Marpura, and other German writers, have disputed with great bitterness, almost every one for a particular method of tuning. It is not with any confidence of success, that one’ more attempt is made, which rests its chief claim to preference, on the similarity of its theory to the actual practice of the best instrument-makers. However we estimate the degree of imperfection of two tem- pered concords of the same nature, it will appear, that the manner of dividing the temperament between them does not materially alter its aggregate sum; for instance, the imperfection of a comma in a major-third, occasions it to beat very nearly twice as fast as that of halfa comma. If indeed the imperfection were great, it might affect an interval so materially as to destroy its character; as, in some methods of temperament, a minor third diminished by two commas approaches more nearly to the ratio 6: 7, than to 5: 6; but, with this limitation, the sum of harmony is nearly equal in all systems. Hence, if every one of the twelve major and minor thirds occurred equally often in | the compositions which are to be performed on an instrument, it would be of no great consequence, to the sum of the imper- fections, among which of the thirds they were divided: and, even in this case, the opinion of the best practical authors is, that the difference of character produced by a difference of pro- portions in various keys, would be of considerable advantage in the general effect of modulation. But, when it is considered, that upon an average of all the music ever composed, some parti- cular keys occur at least twice as often as others, there seems to be a very strong additional reason for making the harmony the most perfect in those keys which are the most frequently respecting Sound and Light. 145 used; since the aggregate sum of all the imperfections which occur in playing, must by this means be diminished in the greatest possible degree, and the diversity of character at the same time preserved. Indeed, in practice, this method, under different modifications, has been almost universal; for, although many have pretended to an equal temperament, yet the methods which they have employed to attain it have been evidently defective. It appears to me, that every purpose may be answered, by making C:E too sharp by a quarter of a comma, which will not offend the nicest ear; E: G*, and A’: C, equal; F*: A* too sharp by a comma; and the major thirds of all the intermediate keys more or less perfect, as they approach more or less to C in the order of modulation... The fifths are perfect enough in every system. The results of this method are shown in Table x11. In practice, nearly the same effect may be very simply produced, by tuning from C to F, B’, E’, G*, C*, F* six perfect fourths; and C, G, D, A, E, B, F*, six equally im- perfect fifths, Plate VI. Fig. 52. If the unavoidable imperfections of the fourths be such as to incline them to sharpness, the temperament will approach more nearly to equality, which is preferable to an inaccuracy on the other side. An easy method of comparing different systems of temperament is exhibited in. Plate VII. Fig. 53, which may easily be extended to all the sys- tems that have ever been invented, : MDCCC, U 146 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries Table xi. B Cc iC + .0013487| 1 A, E — .0023603 2G, F .0019006/ 2 D, B .0029122 3D; B 0024525| 3G, F* — .0034641 Tipovis od 0034641) 4.C,C* .004475 5E, A’ 0044756] 5 F,G* — .0049353 6 B,C* — .0049353| 6 B’, E’ .0053950 yillie 0053950 1 EF’, G*, 'C*, F* ~ '—"c000000 2 F, B’, E, B .0004,597 3 C,G, D, A .0011562 A, shows the division of a monochord corresponding to each note, in the system proposed. B, the logarithm of the temperament of each of the major thirds. C, of the minor thirds. D, of the fifths ; C and D being both negative. Thus, Sir, I have endeavoured to advance a few steps only, in the investigation of some very obscure but interesting sub- jects. As far as I know, most of these observations are new; but, if they should be found to have been already made by any other person, their repetition in a connected chain of inference may still be excusable. Iam persuaded also, that at least some of the positions maintained are incontrovertibly consistent with truth and nature; but, should further experiments tend to con- fute any opinions that I have suggested, I shall relinquish them with as much readiness as 1 have long since abandoned the —— a respecting Sound and Light. 147 hypothesis which I once took the liberty of submitting to the Royal Society, on the functions of the crystalline lens. Lam, &c. Emanuel College, Cambridge, THOMAS: YOUNG. 8th July, 1799. EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES. (See Plates IIT. IV. V. VI. and VII.) Plate III. Figs. 1—6. The section of a stream of air from a tube .07 inch in diameter, as ascertained by measuring the breadth of the impression on the surface of a liquid. The pressure im- pelling the current, was in Fig. 1, 1 inch. Fig. 2, 2. Fig. 3, @.. Fig. Agde oFig.55-7> Fig. 6, 10, Figs. 7—12. A similar section, where the tube was .1 in dia- meter, compared with the section as inferred from the experi- ments with two gages, which is represented by a dotted line. From this comparison it appears, that where the velocity of the current was small, its central parts only displaced the liquid; and that, where it was great, it displaced, on meeting with resistance, a surface somewhat greater than its own sec= tion. The pressure was in Fig. 7, 1. Fig. 8, 2. Fig.9, 3. Fig. topde re ia, Zorkigy 12710: Figs. 13—20. A, the half section of a stream of air from a tube .1 in diameter, as inferred from experiments with two water gages. The pressure was in Fig. 19, .1. Fig. 14, .2. Fig. t5, -5. Fig. 16,1. Fig. 17,3. Fig. 18, 5. Fig. 19, 7. Fig. 20, 10. The fine lines, marked B, show the result of the observa- Ue 148 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries tions with an aperture .15 in diameter opposed to the stream; C with .g; and D with .5. _ Figs. 21—23. A, the half section of a current from a tube .3 in diameter, with a pressure of .5, of 1, and of 3. B shows the course of a portion next the axis of the current, equal in dia- meter to those represented by the last figures. Plate IV. Fig. 24. The appearance of a stream of smoke forced very gently from a fine tube. Fig. 25 and 26, the same appearance when the pressure is gradually increased. Fig. 27. See Section IIT. Fig. 28. The perpendicular lines over each division of the horizontal line show, by their length and distance from that line, the extent of pressure capable of producing, from the re- spective pipes, the harmonic notes indicated by the figures placed opposite the beginning of each, according to the scale of 22 inches parallel to them. The larger numbers, opposite the middle of each of these lines, show the number of vibrations of the cor- responding sound in a second. Plate V. Figs. 29—33. See Section X. Fig. 34. The combination of two equal sounds constituting the interval of an octave, supposing the progress and regress of the particles of air equable. Figs. 95, 36, 37, a similar repre- sentation of a major third, major tone, and minor sixth. Fig. 38. A fourth, tempered about two commas. Fig. 39. A vibration of a similar nature, combined with subor- dinate vibrations of the same kind in the ratios of 3, 5, and 7. respecting Scund and Light. 149 Fig. 40. A vibration represented by a curve of which the ordinates are the sines of circular arcs increasing uniformly, corresponding with the motion of a cycloidal pendulum, com- bined with similar subordinate vibrations in the ratios of 3, 5, and 7. Plate VI. Figs. 41 and 42. Two different positions of a major third, composed of similar vibrations, as represented by figures of sines. Fig. 43. A contracted representation of a series of vibrations. A, a simple uniform sound. B, the beating of two equal sounds nearly in unison, as derived from rectilinear figures. C, the beats.of two equal sounds, derived from figures of sines. D, a musical consonance, making by its frequent beats a fundamental harmonic. E, the imperfect beats of two unequal sounds. Fig. 44. Various forms of the orbit of a musical chord, when inflected, and when struck. Fig. 4.5. Forms of the orbit, when the sound is produced by means of a bow. Fig. 46. Epitrochoidal curves, formed by combining a simple rotation or vibration with other subordinate rotations or vibra- tions. Figs. 47 and 48. The successive forms of a tended chord, when inflected and let go, according to the construction of De ta GranceE and EvuLer. Fig. 49. The appearance of a vibrating chord which had been inflected in the middle, the strongest lines representing the most luminous parts. Fig. 50. The appearance of a vibrating chord, when inflected at any other point than the middle. 150 Dr. Youne’s Experiments and Inquiries, &c. Fig. 51. The appearance of a chord, when put in motion by a bow applied nearly at one third of the length from its end. Fig. 52. The method of tuning recommended for common use, Plate VII. Fig. 53. A comparative view of different systems of tem- perament. The whole circumference represents an octave. The inner circle L is divided into 30103 parts, corresponding with the logarithmical parts of an octave. The next circle R shows the magnitude of the simplest musical and other ratios. Q is di- vided into twelve equal parts, representing the semitones of the equal temperament described by Zar ino, differing but little from the system of ArIsToxENuS, and warmly recommended by Marpurc and other late writers. Y exhibits the system pro- posed in this paper as the most desirable; and P the practical method nearly approaching to it, which corresponds with the eleventh method in Marpure’s enumeration, except that, by beginning with C instead of B, the practical effect of the tem- perament is precisely inverted. K is the system of KIRNBERGER and SuLzer; which is derived from one perfect third, ten per- fect and two equally imperfect fifths. M is the system of mean tones, the sistema participato of the old Italian writers, still fre- quently used in tuning organs, approved also by Dr. Smiru for common use. S shows the result of all the calculations in Dr. Smitu’s harmonics, the system proposed for his changeable harpsichord, but neither in that nor any other form capable of practical application. Thilos. Gans. MYVCCCSIUN pido. al | \ | | 2422 | | | 4 | ik ' nina : | Doe | 1460 1352 | 1664 | | | | | | | | i i i AN { i 4 1456 le | | : , 1 | | | s 1248 | 7 | 2847 | | H | : 1040 i | | | ‘| 876 ie mad | | : ® 1730 | \8 | | H ae 1675 | | ae 7 1842 : 32 | | { WwW 1507 | | 7 iQ 728 mn H cp clei gla nec b soma 7 | feo. 9! ye 416 3 | 1005 | 1 ra | 346 3 1 312 Cs 20.5 OPEN 4.5 STOPPED 9.4 STOPPED 16.1 STOPPED 20.5 STOPPED _ Lhitos. rans. MDCCCHAUN paso. BW MES i (at aN aN aa \ ) Va Fig. 24. : a ee a = ys ak ) ) SeS> = oF Ya] ) ) ee z OS a INE = Fig 25 =) Vs = \ ( ) ss y) ) ) — iy / =~ — ) i) 2 ) ) Tig.28 Ty ag ae af “102 [on Sal elm ye “| = 3460 | | H | | | | | | | | | F i Fig26. | | | | | 6 | | | | | 5 | | 2422 | | | | i | dg 1664 | 2680 | 1460 s j 1352 | t 2336 | | | | | ' lem | i 1 { | \ | | | | 2768 | | H | ‘ } | | | ' | | | | io- 2076 1456 | | i | | | | | 1248 | | i} 2817 | 1040 | | | | | | 8 | 876 3 44 | 5 | F | | 1730 ' 5 n68 4 aa A | | 2 7 | 832 sai | 928 7 1842 i ‘ ie | 1507 | 3 5 | | f) | 728 a H 1 a oe WP | re 5 297 H 2088 3 | 520 9 | nj? 2 692 (8 m6 |Z) 100d | 4 a 346 [3 | a2 | H 4.5 OPEN 9.4 OPEN 16.10PEN ‘ 20.5 OPEN 4-5 STOPPED 9.4 STOPPED 16.1 STOPPED 20.5 STOPPED —-!| $$ Pie” ie @ er nee ! _ : ‘ : a a " a PL £ as ba De ee CM Ce pe Oe PS Y, ¥ a0 e oss Pe ? O35 a, nM sah nen va oy . ie 0 hae | Bi oa - - > . ; E = Pa sa a ; ‘ ; " j i 4 iy - ; ; ‘ A e : rf . ir ’ x onl sft . CT er tf ' 5 , ys Thilos. Trams, MIICCC. Plale V. fp ti. Philos. Trans. MIC CC. Late V. 150. a sea A B 2 3S ee QCG/0 bt0/0 $8040 41600 11880 1 8d 470 Lhilos. Trans. MCC C HaleM 150. Nig7 Fig. lig.9 Figo Ngan Figuz Hy . Shitos Liars. MYCCC STAIN p50. | Fig 43 B _ecay ns — & a . ’ a Lhitos Trans MVC C C.LateXIX Lp LILO. a) ‘ a } Bgrefe Lhites Trans MDC CCLateXIX p36. Barefe. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS, OF THE. Az ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. FOR THE YEAR MDCCC. PART II. LONDON, PRINTED BY W. BULMER AND CO. CLEVELAND-ROW, ST. JAMES'S ; AND SOLD BY PETER ELMSLY, PRINTER TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY, MDCCC. 5 * ’ “ has t ‘ An it i Wve aareres” ‘ : axe t le ~ y = CONTENTS. XIX. ExpeRIMeENTs on the solar, and on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat; with a comparative View of the Laws to which Light and Heat, or rather the Rays which occasion them, are subject, in order to determine whether they are the same, or different. Part 11. By William Herschel, LL. D. F. R.S. page 437 XX. An Account of the Trigonometrical Survey, carried on in the Years 1797, 1798, and 1799, by Order of Marquis Cornwallis, Master-General of the Ordnance. By Captain William Mudge, of the Royal Aritllery, F. R. S. Communicated by bis Grace the Duke of Richmond, F. R. S. P. 539 fi 4 ) J f * . ; ‘ 4 t » ' = D 1 x 4 _ - 3 Aud r sv \ ' ‘ . \ ¥) ey . . ‘ ; - }F 7 s - ‘ PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. XIX. Experiments on tbe solar, and on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat ; with a comparative View of the Laws to which _ Light and Heat, or rather the Rays which occasion them, are subject, in order to determine whether they are the same, or different. By William Herschel, LL. D. F, R. S. Parry 11* Read November 6, 1800. Ix the first part of this Paper it has been shewn, that heat derived immediately from the sun, or from candent terrestrial substances, is occasioned by rays emanating from them; and that such heat-making rays are subject to the laws of reflection, and of refraction. The similarity between light and heat, in these points, is so great, that it did not appear necessary to notice some small difference between them, relating to the refraction of rays to a certain focus, which will be mentioned hereafter. But the next three articles of this Paper will require, that while we shew the similarity between light and heat, we should at * For the First Part of this Paper, see page 293. MDCCC. 3L ) * 438 Dr. Herscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and the same time point out some striking and substantial diffe-- rences, which will occur in our experiments on the rays which occasion them, and on which hereafter we may proceed to argue, when the question reserved for the conclusion of this Paper, whether light and heat be occasioned by the same or by different rays, comes to be discussed. ARTICLE iv.— Different Refrangibility of the Rays of Heat. We might have included this articlesin the first part of this Paper, as a corollary of the former three; since rays that have been separated by the prism, and have still remained subject to the laws of reflection and refraction, as has been shewn, could not be otherwise than of different refrangibility; but we have something to say on this subject, which will be found much more - circumstantial and conclusive than what might have been drawn as a consequence from our former experiments. However, to begin with what has already been shewn, we find that two degrees of heat were obtained from that part of the spectrum which contains the violet rays, while the full red colour, on the opposite side, gave no less than seven degrees ;* and these facts ascertain the different refrangibility of the rays which occasion heat, as clearly as that of light is ascertained by the dispersion and variety of the colours. For, whether the rays which occa- sion heat be the same with those which occasion the colours, which is a case that our foregoing experiments have not ascer- tained, the arguments for their diffetent refrangibility rests on the same foundation, namely, their being dispersed by the prism; and that of the rays of light being admitted, the different * See 2d and 4th experiments, pages 258 and 259. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 439 refrangibility of the rays of heat follows of course. So far then, a great resemblance again takes place. ; I must now point out a very material difference, which is, that the rays of heat are of a much more extensive refrangibility than those of light. In order to make this appear, I shall de- lineate a spectrum of light, by assuming a line of a certain length; and, dividing it into seven parts, according to the di- mensions assigned to the seven colours by Sir Isaac NEwTon, in the fourth figure of the second part of his Qptics, I shall represent the illuminating power of which each colour is pos- sessed, by an ordinate drawn to that line. And here, as the absolute length of the ordinates is arbitrary, provided they be proportional to each other, I shall assume the length of that which is to express the maximum, equal to 22 of the whole line. Thus, let GQ * represent the line that contains the arrange- ment of the colours, from the red to the violet. Then, erecting on the confines of the yellow and green the line LR = 21 of - GQ, it will represent the power of illumination of the rays in that place. For, by experiments already delivered, we have shewn that the maximum of illumination is in the brightest yellow or palest green rays.-{ From the same experiments we collect, that the illuminations of yellow and green are equal to each other, and not much inferior to the maximum ; this gives us the ordinates K and M. Then, by the rest of the same ex- periments, we obtain also the ordinates H, I, N, O, P, with _ sufficient accuracy for the purpose here intended. All these being applied to the middle of the spaces which belong to their respective colours, we have the figure GRQG, representing what may be called the spectrum of illumination. * See Plate XX. + See page 262, gle 4,40 Dr. HERScHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and We are now, in the same manner, to find a figure to express the heating power of the refracted prismatic rays, or what may be called the spectrum of heat. In order to determine the length of our base, I examined the extent of the invisible rays, and found, that at a distance of two inches beyond visible red, my thermometer, in a few minutes, acquired 14 degree of heat. The extent of the coloured spectrum at that time, or the line which answers to GQ in my figure, measured 2,997 inches. If two inches had been the whole of the extent of the invisible part, it might be stated to be in proportion to the visible one as 2 to 3; but we are to make some allowance for a small space required beyond the last ordinate, that the curve of the heating power drawn through it may reach the base; and indeed, at 22 inches beyond visible red, I could still find $ degree of heat. It appears therefore sufficiently safe, to admit the base of the spec- trum of heat AQ, to be to that of the spectrum of light GQ, as 52 to 3; or, conforming to the Newrontan figure before men- tioned, the base of which is 9,9 inches, as 573 to 33. Now, if we assume for the maximum of heat, an ordinate of an equal length with that which was fixed upon for the maximum of light, it will give us a method of comparing the two spectra together. Accordingly, I have drawn the several ordinates B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K,L, M,N, O,P, of such lengths as, from experiments made on purpose, it appeared they should be, in order to express the heat indicated by the thermometer, when placed on the base, at the several stations pointed out by the letters. > eye] A mere inspection of the two figures, which have been drawn as lying upon one another, will enable us now to see how very differently the prism disperses the heat-making rays, and those on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 4A which occasion illumination, over the areas ASQA, and GRQG, of our two spectra! These rays -neither agree in their mean refrangibility, nor in the situation of their maxima. At R, where we have most light, there is but little heat; and at S, where we _ have most heat, we find no light at all! 21st Experiment. The Sines of Refraction of the beat-making Rays, are in a constant Ratio to the Sines of Incidence. I used a prism with a refracting angle of 61 degrees; and, placing the thermometer No. 4 half an inch, and No. 1 one inch, beyond the last visible red colour, I kept No. 2 by the side of the spectrum, as a standard for temperature. At = inch. At 1 inch, Standard. No. Ae No. 1. ‘No. g. EB benleliiy nr fcr ont 94 suk om 6:4. os 03H Bebo @ Fai ciruiarina Sy noteniat ss : 8% 5 eile gd ite = init matty Oe By! nO ies Syren won Wort Fu'a wit ain O34 Here, in eight minutes, the thermometer at half an inch from visible colour, rose 5£ degrees; and, at one inch from the same, the other thermometer rose 34; while the temperature, as ap- pears by No. 2, remained without change. I now took a prism with an angle of forty-five degrees, and, placing the thermometers as before, I had as follows: 55 5 i 55 3 be 55 Sa ae LSA: kiToeed Tob Dae Cries ieromiowit, 38 4): Fenris 2} us8S Se ee hdnaigh ili BEF vin ous yo tga gS Here we likewise had, in 10 minutes, a rise of 7 degrees in the 442 Dr. Herscuet’s Experiments on the solar, and thermometer No. 4, and of g3 in No. 1; while No. 2 remained stationary. I tried now all the three angles of a prism of whitish glass: they were of 63, 62, and 55 degrees; and I found invisible rays of heat to accompany all the visible spectra given by these angles. I tried a prism of crown glass, having an pone of go degrees ; and found invisible heat rays as before. I tried a prism of flint glass, with so small an angle as 19 degrees, and again found invisible heat rays. I made a hollow prism, by cementing together three slips of glass of an equal length, but unequal breadth, so as to give me different refracting angles: they were of 51°, 62° go’, and 66° 30’. Then, filling it with water, and receiving the spectrum, when exposed to the sun, as usual, on the table, I placed the thermometer No. 1 at ,4 inch behind the visible red colour, and No. 5 in the situation of the standard. The refracting angle of the prism was 62° 30’; and, in five minutes, the thermometer received 13 degrees of heat from the invisible rays. On trying the other angles, I likewise found invisible heat rays, in their usual situation beyond the red colour. Now, setting aside a minute inquiry into the degrees of heat occasioned by these invisible rays, I shall here only consider them as an additional part, annexed to the different quantities of heat which are found to go along with the visible spectrum; in the same manner as if, in the spectrum of light, another colour had been added beyond the red. Then, as from the foregomg experiments it appears, that a change of the refracting medium, and of the angle by which the refractions were made, occasioned no alteration in the relative situation of the additional part AG, on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 443 with respect to GQ; and, as the part GQ is already known to follow the law of refraction we have mentioned, it is equally evident, that the additional heat of AG must follow the same law. We do not enter into the dispersive power of different ’ mediums with respect to heat, since that would lead us farther than the present state of our investigation could authorise us to go; the following experiment however will shew that, as with light so with heat, such dispersive power must be admitted. aed Experiment. Correction of the different Refrangibility of Heat, by contrary Refraction in different Mediums. _ I took three prisms; one of crown glass, having an angle of 25 degrees ; another of flint glass, with an angle of 24; and a third of crown glass, with an angle of 10 degrees. These being put together, as they are placed when experiments of achromatic refractions are to be made, I found that they gave a spectrum nearly without colour. The composition seemed tq be rather a little over adjusted; there being a very faint tinge of red on the most refracted side, and of violet on the least refracted margin. I examined both extremes by two thermometers ; keeping No. 3 as a standard, while No. 2 was applied for the discovery of invisible rays; but I found no heat on either side. After this, I placed No. 2 in the middle of the colourless illu- mination; and in a little time it rose two degrees, while No. 3 still remained unaltered at some small distance from the spec- trum. This quantity was full as much as I could expect, con- sidering the heat that must have been intercepted by three prisms. Thus then it appears, that the different refrangibility of heat, as well as that of light, admits of prismatic correction. And we may add, that this experiment also tends to the estab- 444 Dr. HerscueEx’s Experiments on the solar, and lishment of the contents of the preceding one; for the refran- gibility of heat rays could not be thus corrected, were the sines of refraction not in a constant ratio to those of incidence. . 23d Experiment. In Burning-glasses, the Focus of the Rays of Heat is different from the Focus of the Rays of Light. I placed my burning lens, with its aperture reduced to three inches, in order to lessen the aberration arising from the sphe- rical figure, in the united rays of the sun; and, being now apprised of the different refrangibility of the rays of heat, and knowing also that the least refrangible of them are the most efficacious, I examined the focus of light, by throwing hair- — powder, with a puff, into the air. This pointed out the mean focus of the illuminating rays, situated in that part of the pencil which opticians have shewn to be the smallest space into which they can be collected. That this may be called the focus of light, our experiments, which have proved the maximum of illumi- nation to be situated between the yellow and green, and there- fore among the mean refrangible rays of light, have fully estab- lished. The mean focus being thus pointed out by the reflection’ of light on the floating particles of powder, I held a stick of sealing wax 1”,6, or four beats of my chronometer, in the con- tracted pencil, half an inch nearer to the lens than the focus.» In this time, no impression was made upon the wax. I applied it now half an inch farther from the lens than that focus; and, in 8-tenths of a second, or two beats of the same chronometer, it was considerably scorched. Exposing the sealing wax also - to the focus of light, the effect was equally strong in the same — time ; from which we may safely conclude, notwithstanding the little accuracy that can be expected, for want of a more proper - on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 4A5 apparatus, from so coarse an experiment, that the focus of heat, n this case, was certainly farther removed from the lens than the focus of light, and probably not less than 4 of an inch; the heat, at half an inch beyond the focus of light, being still equal to that in the focus. ARTICLE v.—Transmission of heat-making Rays. We enter now on the subject of the transmission: of heat through diaphanous bodies. Our experiments have hitherto been conducted by the prism, the lens, and the mirror; these may indeed be looked upon as our principal tools, and, as such, will stand foremost in all our operations ; but the scantiness of this stock cannot allow us to bring our work to perfection. Nor is it merely the want of tools, but rather the natural imperfection of those we have, that hinders our rapid progress. The prism which we use for separating the combined rays of the sun, refracts, reflects, transmits, and scatters them at the same time; and the laws by which it acts, in every one. of these operations, ought to be investigated. Even the cause of the most obvious of its effects, the separation of the colours of light, is not well understood; for, in two prisms of different glass, when the angles are such as to give the same mean refraction, the dispersive power is known to differ. Their transmissions have been still less ascertained; and I need not add, that the internal and external reflexions, and the scattering of rays on every one of the surfaces, are all of such a nature as must throw some obscurity on every result of experiments made with prisms. A lens partakes of all the inconveniencies of the prism; to which its own defects of spherical aberrations must MDCCC. — 3M 44,6 Dr. HERScHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and be added. And a mirror, besides its natural incapacity of sepa~ rating the rays of light from the different sorts of heat, scatters them very profusely. But, if we have been scantily provided with materials to act upon rays, it has partly been our own fault: every diaphanous body may become a new tool, in the hands of a diligent inquirer. My apparatus for transmitting the rays of the sun is of the following construction.* Ina box, 12 inches long, and 8 inches broad, are fixed two thermometers. The sides of the box are 2+ inches: deep. That part of the box where the balls of the thermometers are, is covered by a board, in which are two holes of 3 inch diameter, one over each of the balls of the thermometers; and the bottom of the box, under the cover, is cut away, so as to leave these balls freely exposed. There is a partition between the two thermometers, in that part of the box which is covered, to prevent the communication of secondary scatterings of heat. Just under the opening of the transmitting holes, on the outside of the cover, is fixed a slip of wood, on which may rest any glass or other object, of which the trans- mitting capacity is to be ascertained. A thin wooden cover is provided,-f that it may be laid over the transmitting holes, occa- sionally, to exclude the rays of the sun; and, on the middle of the slip of wood, under the holes, a pin is to be stuck perpen- dicularly, that. its shadow may point out the situation of the box with respect to the sun. The box, thus prepared, is to be fastened upon two short boards, joined together by a pair of hinges. A long slip of mahogany is screwed to the lowest of these boards, and lies in the hollow part of a long spring, fastened against the side of the upper one. The pressure of the * See Plate XXI. Fig. 1. + See Fig. 2. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 447 spring must be sufficiently strong to keep the boards at any angle; and the slip of mahogany long enough to permit an elevation of about 85 degrees. In order to see whether all be properly adjusted, expose the apparatus to the sun, and lift up the board which carries the box, till the directing pin throws the shadow of its head on the place where the point is fastened. Then hold a sheet of paper under the box, and, if the thermometers have been: properly placed, the shadow of their balls will be in the centre of the rays passing through the transmitting holes to the paper. A screen of a considerable size,* with a parallelogrammic opening, should be placed at a good distance, to keep the sun’s rays from every part of the apparatus, except that which is under the cover; and no more sun should be admitted into the room, than what will be completely received on the screen, inter- posed between the window and the apparatus. As one of the thermometers is to indicate a certain quantity of heat coming to it by the direct ray, while the other is to shew how much of it is stopped by the glass laid over the trans- mitting hole, it becomes of the utmost consequence to have two thermometers of equal sensibility. The difficulty of getting * See Plate XXII. Fig. 1. + The theory of the sensibility of thermometers, as far as it depends on the size of the balls, may be considered thus, Let D, d, S, s, T, ¢ be the diameters, the points on which the sun acts, and the points on which the temperature acts, of a large and a small thermometer having spherical balls; and let x: y be the intensity of the action of the sun, to the intensity of the action of the temperature, on equal points of the surface of both thermometers. Then we haves: S::d*: D?,andt: T :: 4d* ; 4D’. The action of the sun therefore will be expressed by d? z, D* x; and that of the tem- perature by 4d*y, 4D* y; and the united action of both by —4y x a>, x—4y x D*; which are to each other, as d?; D*, Now, the total effect being as the squares of the g3Ma 448 Dr: Herscuex’s Experiments on the solar, and such is much greater than can be imagined: a perfect equality in the size and thickness of the balls is, however, the most essential circumstance. When two are procured, they should be tried in quick and in slow exposures. These terms may be explained by referring to fire heat; for here the thermometers may be exposed so as to acquire, for instance, 30 degrees of heat in a very short time; which may then be called a quick exposure: or they may be placed so as to make it require a good while to raise them so many degrees; on which account the exposure may be called slow. It is true, that we have it not in our power to render the sun’s rays more or less efficacious, and therefore cannot have a quick or slow exposure at our com- mand; but a great difference will be found in the heat of a rising, or of a meridian sun: not to mention a variety of other causes, that influence the transmission of heat through the atmosphere. Now, when thermometers are tried in various exposures, they should traverse their scales together with con- stant equality ; otherwise no dependance can be placed on the results drawn from experiments made with them, in cases where only a few minutes can be allowed for the action of the cause whose influence we are to investigate. The balls must not be blacked; for, as we have already to encounter the transmitting capacity of the glass of which these balls are made, it will not be safe to add to this the transmitting disposition of one or more coats of blacking, which can never diameters, while z : y remain in their incipient ratio, and the contents of the thermo- meters being as the cubes, the sensible effect produced on the particles of mercury, must be as 5 : = se - : a that is, inversely as the diameters. The small thermo- meter therefore will set off with a sensibility greater than that of the large one, in the same ratio, ' on: the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 449 be brought to an equality, and are always liable to change, especially in very quick exposures. Transmission of Solar Heat through colourless Substances. 24th Experiment. I laid a piece of clear transparent glass, with a bluish-white cast, upon one of the holes of the transmitting machine: the faces of this glass are parallel, and highly polished. Then, put- ting the cover over both holes, I placed the machine in the situation where the experiment was to be made, and let it remain there a sufficient time, that the thermometers might assume a settled temperature. For this purpose, an assistant thermometer, which should always remain in the nearest convenient place to the apparatus, will be of use, to point out the time when the experiment may be begun ; for this ought not to be done, till the thermometers to be used agree with the standard. In order not to lose time after an experiment, the apparatus may be taken into a cool room, or current of air, till the thermometers it contains are rather lower than the standard; after which, being brought to the required situation, they will soon be fit for action. All these precautions having been taken, I began the experi- ment by first writing down the degrees of the thermometers ; then, opening the cover at the time that a clock or watch shew- ing seconds came toa full minute, I continued to write down the state of the thermometers for not less than five minutes. The result was as follows. 950 Dr. HerscuE,’s Experiments on the solar, and No. Be No. 1. ; of tehauertd cot Sun, ? Bluish-white glass — ¥ a2 Vinee oy 67 67 1 683 + ine OBE, 2 7oL 691 8 a 79 4 723 79% ) 5 73 Wit... 6: 42750. Here the sun communicated, in 5 minutes, 6 degrees of heat to the thermometer No. 5, which was openly exposed to: its action; while, in the same time, No. 1 received only 42 degrees by rays transmitted through the bluish-white glass: then, as 6:4£::1:,750. This shews plainly, that only 3 of the inci- dent heat were transmitted, and therefore that 2 of it was. intercepted by the glass. I shall here, as well as in the following experiments, point out the difference between heat and light, in order, as has been mentioned before, to lead to an elucidation of our last discus- sion. To effect this, therefore, I have ascertained, with all the accuracy the subject will admit of, the quantity of light trans- mitted through such glasses as I have used; but, as it would here interrupt the order of our subject, I have joined, at the end of this Paper, a table, with a short account of the method that has been used in making it, wherein the quantity of light transmitted is set down; and to: this table I shall now refer. | To render this comparative view more clear, we may sup- pose always 1000 rays of heat to come from the object: then, 750 being transmitted, it follows, that the bluish-white glass used in our experiment stops 250 of them; and, by the table at | on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. ‘451 the’end of this Paper, it stops 86 rays of light; the number of them coming from the object also being put equal to 1000. ° It should be remarked, that when I compare the interception of solar heat with that of the light of a candle, it must not be understood that I take terrestrial to be the same as solar light ; but, not having at present an opportunity of providing a similar table for the latter, Iam obliged to use the former, on a suppo- sition, that the Sti ‘stopped by glasses may not be very different. a i 25th Experiment. I took a piece of flint glass, about 24 ansible of an a thick, and fastened it over one ox the holes of the transmitting appa- ratus. rei No # . No. iat Sim. 1) “Ot vie? ot Wise glass, MOOR trove: od 189d TRO leh (fe 72309. ° 72% iy ei oT MEE ORME Tuy 73 75% 74 +++ Sz? 5 =,909 Here the heat-making rays gave, in 5: minutes, 51 degrees to ’ the thermometer No.5 ; and, by transmission through the flint glass, 5 degrees to No; 1. Then, proceeding as before, we have, 53 = 9095 which shews that 91 rays of heat were stopped. In the table before referred to, we find that this glass stops 34 Faye or light.” 9" 8" gO Before I proceed, it ‘will be necessary t to adopt a method of reducing the detail of my experiments into a narrower com~ Ab Dr. HERscueEt’s Experiments on the solar, and pass. It will be sufficient to say, that they have all been made on the same plan. as the two which have been given. The observations_were always continued for at least five minutes; and, by examining the ratios of the numbers given by the ther- mometers in all that time, it may be seen that, setting aside little _ irregularities, there ‘is a greater stoppage at first than towards the end ; but, as it would not be safe to take a shorter exposure than five minutes, on account of the small quantity of heat transmitted by some glasses, I have fixed upon that interval as sufficiently accurate for giving a true comparative view. The experiments therefore may now stand abridged as follows. 26th Experiment. I took a piece of highly polished crown glass, of a greenish colour, and, cutting it-into several parts, examined the transmit- ting power of one of them, reserving the other pieces for some other experiments that will be mentioned hereafter. Sun. Greenish crown glass. o! 665 664 5 73, Wii... 63: 5=,741 This glass therefore stops 259 rays of heat, and 20g of light. o7th Experiment. I cut likewise a piece of coach glass into several parts, and tried one of them, reserving also the other pieces for future experiments. Sun. Coach glass. °’ 682 682 de a 755 The ++ 7+ Fz = 786 It stops 214 rays of heat, and 168 of light. - on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 453 28th Experiment. I examined a piece of Iceland crystal, of nearly two-tenths of an inch in thickness. Sun, Iceland crystal. of 67 67 : 5 72%. 712... 55:44 = 5750 It stops 244, rays of heat, and 150 of light. 29th Experiment. Sun, Talc. o! 675 675 5 79 3 712...44:97==,861 It stops 139 rays of heat, and go of light. goth Experiment. Sun. An easily calcinable talc. 0! 5O 50 5 548 — (§35...48 29% =,816 It stops 184 rays of heat, and 288 of light. Transmission of solar Heat through Glasses of the prismatic Colours. gist Experiment. Sun. Very dark red glass. ; S 73 73 5 79% 74% rege etn This glass stops 800 rays of heat, and 9999, out of ten thou~ sand, rays of light; which amounts nearly to a total separation of light from heat. MDCCC, . 3N 454 Dr. Herscuen’s Experiments on the solar,and g2d Experiment. Sun. Dark-red glass. o! 682 682 5 723 70 +++ Ag? 1g == 5394 This red glass stops only 606 rays of heat! and above 4999, out of five thousand, rays of light. 33d Experiment. Sun. Orange glass. o a 673 5 743 703 +. OF 2 25 = 396 This orange-coloured glass stops 604, rays of heat, which is nearly as much as is stopped by the last red one; but it stops only 779 rays of light. 34th Experiment. Sun. Yellow glass. 70% 704 74% 73+ - + 34223 = 667 It stops 333 rays of heat, and 319 of light. g5tb Experiment. Sun. Pale-green glass. On 707 70x 3 43 —— 5 744 71g: ++ Bas taegae It stops 633 rays of heat, and only 535 of light. 36th Experiment. , Sun Dark-green glass. o’ 675 675 5 Ae 68i,,.62:5:1=5,151 on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. ASS This glass stops 849 rays of heat, and g4g of light. This accounts for its great use as a darkening glass for telescopes. 37th Experiment, Sune Bluish-green glass. t 3 : e 695 695 5 762 Ri o7 112 a= 292 It stops 768 rays of heat, and 769 of light. 38th Experiment. Sun. Pale-blue glass. ti 3 3 9) 7°z 705 3 a 5 5 704 Flaite Ol 2A 1S The pale blue glass stops not less than 812 rays of heat, and only 684 of light. . 39th Experiment. Sun, Dark-blue glass. Oo’ 71 71 5 76% 74z > ++ 5g 85 = 638 The dark-blue glass stops only 362 rays of heat, and 801 of - light. | | 40th Experiment. Sun, Indigo glass. o! 612 612 5 7 a 64,...61:2F = ‘967 This glass stops 633 rays of heat, and 9997, out of ten thou- sand, rays of light. 3Ne 456 Dr. HERscuEx’s Experiments on the solar, and 41st Experiment. Sun. Pale-indigo glass, o! 762 62 : 5 672 642... 5%: 23 = 468 It stops 532 rays of heat, and g78 of light. 42d Experiment. Sun, Purple glass. o! 613 613 673 OAc... sO 5 2— = emi It stops 583 rays of heat, and 999 of light. 49d Experiment. Sun. Violet glass. Gor Got 681 654...-55:39=,511 It stops 489 rays of heat, and 955 of light. Transmission of Solar Heat through Liquids. I took a small tube, 14 inch in diameter,* and fixed a stop with a hole 2 inch wide at each end, on which a glass might. be fastened, so as to confine liquids. The inner distance, or depth of the liquid, when confined, is three inches. Placing now the empty tube, with its two end glasses fixed, upon the trans- mitting apparatus, | had as follows: 44th Experiment. Sun. Empty tube, and two glasses. ol Une 53 53 ae 5 59 55z ++ 6: 25 = 458 * See Plate XXII, Fig. 2, on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. AS7 These glasses, with the intermediate air, stop 542 rays of heat, and 204 of light. 45th Experiment. I filled the tube with well-water, and placed it on the trans- mitting apparatus. Sun. Well-water. COU 524 525 5 585 55 --- OF: 23 = 442 Here two glasses, with water between them, stopped 558 rays of heat. The same glasses, and water, stop only 211 rays of light. If we were to deduct the effect of the empty machine, there would remain, for the water to stop, only 16 rays of heat, and 7 of light; but it cannot be safe to make this conclusion, as we are not sufficiently acquainted with the action of surfaces between the different mediums on the rays of heat and light ; I shall therefore only notice the effect of the compound. 46ib Experiment. I filled now the tube with sea-water, taken from the head of the pier at Ramsgate, at high tide. Sun. Sea-water. 54a 54a 60 BO oo fe ea 1G The compound stops 682 rays of heat, and 288 of light. 47th Experiment. Sun. Spirit of wine. o’ Mh sare 51g 5 572 54... 05: 23 = ,388 . The compound stops 612 rays of heat, and 224 of light. 458 Dr. wie gi 8 Experiments on tbe solar, and 48th Experiment. | : r lo saodT Sun. Gin, ‘ Log bis 3 { oO! 52 52 5 oe 53h --- 5a: 15 = 261 - This compound stops 739 rays of heat, and 626 of light. - 49th Experiment. Sun. Brandy. Q"2 : 3 56 e300) igs 5 6oL 5OZ 0. 4b == 4206 |! This stops 794 rays of heat, and 996 rays of light. — Other liquids have also been tried; but the experiments hav- ing been attended with circumstances that demand a further investigation, they cannot now be given. Transmission of Sip Feat through scattering Substances. 50th Experiment. I rubbed one of the pieces of crown glass, mentioned in the 26th experiment, on fine emery laid on a plain brass tool, to make the surface of-it rough, which, it is well known, will occasion the transmitted light to be scattered in all directions. Supposing that it would have the same effect on heat, I tried the transmitting capacity of the glass, by exposing it with the rough side towards the sun, over one of the transmitting holes of the apparatus. Sun. Crown glass; one side rubbed on emery. o! 67 07 5 74 70% +. +73 Ba = 2530 The glass so prepared stops 464 scattered rays of heat, and 854, of light. Now, as the same glass, in its polished state, trans- ' on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 459 mitted-259 rays of heat, and 203 of light, the alteration pro- duced in the texture of its surface acts very differently upon these two principles; occasioning an additional stoppage of only 205 rays of heat, but of 651 rays of light. 5ist Experiment. One of the pieces of coach glass, mentioned in the 27th experiment, was prepared in the same manner. Sun. Coach glass; one side rubbed on emery, the rough side exposed. ’ I . I e 667, 667, | i I I ° — 5 732 Cot, eo 3429 It stops 571 scattered rays of heat, and 885 of light; so that | the fine scratches on its surface, made by the operation of emery, have again acted very differently upon the rays of heat, and of light, occasioning an additional stoppage of 375 of the former, but of no less than 717 of the latter. 52d Experiment. I took another of the pieces of crown glass, mentioned in the 26th experiment, and rubbed both sides on emery. - Sun. Crown glass; both sides rubbed on emery. o 693 695 | hi ; : ae I -_o—_— sats 755 71z---6:2= 338 The glass thus prepared, stops 667 scattered rays of heat, and 932 of light. : 53d Experiment. Another piece of coach.glass, one of those that were men- tioned in the 27th experiment, was. prepared in the same manner, } ‘ 460 Dr. HERscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and Sun, Coach glass; both sides rubbed on emery. 5 5 : e 695 695 5 75% 7it...64: 15 = ,265 It stops 735 scattered rays of heat, and 946 of light. 54th Experiment. I placed now the coach glass, one side of which had been rubbed on emery, upon the transmitting hole, and over it the crown glass prepared in the same manner, both with the rough side towards the sun; but two slips of card were placed between the glasses, to keep them from touching each other. eats Crown glass. | One side of each rubbed un. Coach glass. on emery. o! 67 67 : ; 5 73%. 69... 6%: 2 = ,go2 These glasses stop 698 scattered rays of heat, and 969 of light. | | 55th Experiment, I placed now the coach glass, with both sides rubbed on emery, on the transmitting hole, and over it the crown glass prepared in the same manner, with two slips of card. between them, to prevent a contact. Coach glass. Li sides of each rubbed on Sun. | Crown glass. emery, 0’ 69% 695 S 75a 702... 6£: 1 =,200 These glasses stop 800 scattered rays of heat, and 979 of light. 19 56th Experiment. I used now all the four glasses; placing them as follows, and putting slips of card between them, to prevent a contact, — on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 461 s Coach glass; ditto. wre Crown glass; rough on both sides. Crown glass; the rough side to the sun, { Coach glass; ditto. U 0 2 kai 572 ee Got 582... 523 = 5146 These four glasses stop no more than 854 apie rays of heat, and ggg of light. 57th Experiment. I used now a piece of glass of an olive colour, burnt into the glass, in the manner that glasses are prepared for church windows, which transmits only scattered light. Sun. Olive-coloured glass, ago 69 | 69 5 Ui ae OL. 72 1b = 161 This glass ee 8 39 scattered rays oF fem and 984, of fight 58th Experiment. Sun, Calcined tale. U 3 A a 3 Sento eyclunen he 513g pestis 5 55% Pay ae ies This substance stops 867 scattered rays of heat, and so much | light that the sun cannot be perceived through it.* 59tb Experiment. 3 "TUSunt)s White paper |“ oy 63 63. | 5 68 5 gts toGgSe. dong 2 ==, Wg Or This substance. ei B59 scattered rays of heat, and 994 of light. bilont 2. t Iauas ot i : ® ‘See the 17 5th Experiment. MDCCC. 31 ig Ov: 462 Dr, HErscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and , Goth en Sun. Linen. o! 63 63 ipa 69 et. ek meiedenml White linen stops 916 scattered rays of i aky aia 95% sae light. 61st Experiment. Sun, White persian. oft FEO § 70 ott 76% ais : 1y = 4240 This thin silk stops 760 scattered rays of hae and 916 of light. : 62d Experiment. _ Sun. Black muslin. 64 | O45 70 66h... 54:14 = ,286 This substance stops 714 scattered rays of heat, and 737 of light. Transmission of terrestrial Flame-heat through various Substances. My apparatus rm the ‘purpose of transmitting fldme cheat i is as follows.* ‘A box 22 inches long, 51 broad, and:13 deep, has | a hole in the centre 1,4 inch in diameter, through which a wax candle, thick enough entirely to, fill it, is to be put at the bot- tom; the box being properly elevated for the purpose. There must be two lateral holes in the bottom, 2 inches long, and 12 broad; .one on each.side’of the candle, to supply it with a cur- rent of air, as otherwise it will not give a ica sid ee is ae. sees aie At the distance pi 13, inch from ‘the — * See gins XXIII. 7 Is on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 463 a hole in each, 3 inch in diameter, through which the heat of the candle passes to the,two thermometers, which are: tp be placed ‘in opposite directions, one on each side, of the table. Care must tbe taken to place them exactly at the same distance from the ‘centre of the flame, as otherwise they will not receive equal quantities of heat. The scales, and their supports, also, must be so kept out of the way of heat coming from the candle, that they may not scatter it back on the balls, but suffer all that is not intercepted by, them to. pass freely forwards in the box, and downwards, through openings cut inthe bottom. ° Before the transmitting holes,.between the two wooden screens, must be ‘two covers of the same material; close to the openings ; * and it -will be necessary to join these covers at the side, by a common handle, that they. may be removed, together, without disturbing any part of the apparatus, when the experiment is to begin. ~ J¥Fhe:glasses are to! be put before the thermometer, close to ‘the. transmitting ‘hole, by placing them on a small support below, while the-upper part is held close to the screen by a light plummet, suspended by»a)thread. which is fastened on.one side, and passes over the glass, toa hook on the other side. In making experiments, many attentions are necessary, such as, keeping the candle. exactly to a certain height, that the brightest part of the flame may be just in the centre of the two transmitting holes : that the wick may be always straight, and not, by bending, ‘approach nearer to’ one thermometer. than to the other: that the wax-cup of the candle be kept clean, and never suffered to runsever, &c) Before, and now.and,then between, the observations also, the thermometers must be tried a few degrees, that it may be seen . =F TR Zou * See Fig. Zu Ago@-erish Io evar $0 eqola I 464 Dr. HERscHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and whether they act equally ; and the candle, during the time they cool down to the temperature, must be put out by an extin- -guisher, large enough to rest on the bottom of the box, without touching any part of the wax. Many other precautions I need not mention, as they will soon be discovered by any one who may repeat such experiments. ~ 63d Experiment. Candle. Bluish-white glasse oy 59% 59z re 623 6oz...3: 14: ==,3975 From this experiment we find, that while the rays of the candle gave 9 degrees of heat to the thermometer openly ex- posed to their action, the other thermometer, which received the same rays through the medium of the interposed glass, rose only 14 degrees. Hence we calculate, that this glass stops 625 rays of flame-heat, out of every thousand that fall on it. It stops only 86 rays of candle-light; but this, having been re- ferred to before, will not in future be repeated. / 64th Experiment. Candle. ‘Flint glass. 3 . o" poe 59% Bet: I 5 623 Got ...93:14= ,409 It stops 591 rays of flame-heat, and light as before. 65th Experiment. . Candle. Crown glass. o! 59% 59% ore ToE 5 625 60d yn Re eee bB64 It stops 696 rays of flame-heat. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 465 66th Experiment. Candle. Coach glass. Oo’ 60 603 5 63 | 62...3: 15 == ,542 It stops 458 rays of flame-heat. 67th Experiment. ‘Candle. Iceland crystal. tes? 3 3 ° 58% 58% I 3 Sia ee 5 6oL 602 ...3%:13 = ,484 It stops 516 rays of flame-heat. 68th Experiment. Candle. Calcinable talc. , 7 7 ° 585 585 z 3 Oph) Voy eases 7 5 612 603...9: 12 = ,625 This substance stops only 375 rays of flame-heat. 69th Experiment. Candle. Very dark red glass, ’ 3 3 Oo 602 603 I a ee ss 5 63+ '612...95:1 = ,364 This glass stops 636 rays of flame-heat. 7oth Experiment. Candle. Dark red glass. ? 3 3 1) : 60% 603. ‘ I we 3! i—_ 14 633 612...93:12 = ,474 It stops 526 rays of flame-heat. 466 Dr, Henscue’s Experiments on the solar, and vist Experiment, Candle, ‘ Orange glass. , I I Oo 6olL 6o0i 3 5 nt eres 5 632 615... 35: 14 = 440 It stops 560 rays of flame-heat, vad Experiment, Candle. Yellow glass, , 5 5 O 603 602 5 633 617...3: 15a It stops 589 rays of flame-heat. ’ 79d Experiment. Candle. Paleegreen glass. of ~ 60% 602 5 637 694...3:15 = ,500 It stops 500 rays of flame-heat. 74th Experiment. Candle. Dark-green glass. o! “9614 614 5 64 612...97: 2 = ,261 It stops 739 rays of flame-heat. | wath Experiment. Candle. Bluish-green glass. of - 614 | 615. ‘ae 64, — 96aL... 97: 1 = 4948 It stops 652 rays of flame-heat. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 467 “6th Experiment. Candle. Pale-blue glass. o! 614 614 i 642 623...2% It stops 609 rays of flame-heat. 77th Experiment. ‘lt stops 520 rays of flame-heat. © > 15 = ,391 : Candle. Dark-blue glass. of 612 613 ; 5 S45 Go3...95:1= ,981 It stops 619 rays of flame-heat. ‘ 78th Experiment. ; Candle. Indigo glass. of 612 3 Bre epee 653 63...31:14 = ,921 It stops 679 rays of flame-heat. 79th Experiment. Candle. . Pale indigo glass. °. 625 625 289 Lr ; oH 643 635 -. 25319 = 1429 It stops 571 rays of flame-heat. 80th Experiment. y Hodis: Candle. > ‘Purple-glass. , 25r.: ie... Say 633...» 337315 = 480 468 — Dr. HERSCHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and ‘ 81st Experiment. Candle. Violet glass. or a 595 «598 af; - 633 HOLS ... 82: 131 ,500 It stops 500 rays of flame-heat.. | aguse we 82d apchiviens Candle. Crown glass; one side rubbed on ETSMIery,5) the rough side exposed. ey 60 6o | 7 3.2 aes 5 633 60g... 33: F = 2259 This glass, so prepared, stops 741 scattered rays of flame- heat. 83d Experiment. Candle. Coach glass; one side rubbed on ~ "emery ; the rough side exposed. Oo’ 59% 59% : + 1B 5 63% Gof... 34:15 = 338 It stops 667 scattered rays of flame-heat. 84th Experiment. Candle. Crown glass; both sides rubbed on emery. patie : a ° 594 594 5 63 WG 5+ Bee Ae es It stops 615 scattered rays of flame-heat. S5th Experiment. 2 Candle. ~*~ __ Coach glass; both sides ae on emery. ’ S) - 595 ~ (59% i 63 Gof... 37: 1 = .320 It stops 680 scattered rays of flame-heat. == = — 2 a the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 469 86th Experiment. Crown glass. | One side of each rubbed Candle. Coach glass. on emery. ’ 7 ° 55g 555 3 ike Fue - 59 562 ....391: 2 = ,280 These glasses stop 720 scattered rays of flame-heat. 87th Experiment. eecah Crown glass. | Both sides of each rubbed pares Coach glass. on emery. 2 it 508 508 i SLAPN EO ee 594 Ohi gg» tg\— 305 These glasses stop 667 rays of flame-heat. 88th Experiment. Crown glass; the rough side to the candle. Coach glass; ditto. Candle. Crown lass 3 rough on both sides ; Coach glass; ditto. Shs 56S 562 5 59¢ 574 +++ 29% | = 5190 These four glasses stop 870 scattered rays of flame-heat. 8oqth Experiment. Candle. Olive-colour, burnt in glass, o! 60 60 5 63 603...3:5 = ,208 This glass stops 792 scattered rays of flame-heat- goth Experiment. Candle, White paper. ‘ © 578 87% 5 603 SUL... O.: * == 1206 This substance stops 792 scattered rays of flame-heat MDCCC, | ‘ie P 4/70 Dr. HerscueE.’s Experiments on the solar, and gist Experiment, Candle. Linen. o 573 S78 Be 64 585... 93315 ==,310 It stops 6go scattered rays of flame-heat. ged Experiment. Candle. White persian. Oo" 578 57 5 - 601 583... 92:12 = ,407 It stops 593 scattered rays of flame-heat. 93d Experiment. Candle. Black muslin. 0! 574 Oe 5 602 59... 22 3 15 == 405 It stops 565 scattered rays of flame-heat. Transmission of the solar Heat which ts of an equal Refrangibility with red prismatic Rays. The apparatus which I have used for transmitting prismatic rays, is of the same construction as that which has already been described under the. head of direct solar transmissions; * but here the holes in the top of the box are only two inches from each other, and no more than $ths in diameter. On the face of the box are drawn two parallel lines, also 3ths of an inch distant from each other, and inclosing the transmitting holes: they serve as a direction whereby to keep any required colour to fall equally on both holes. The distance at which the box is to be * See Plate XXI. + See Plate XXII. Fig. 3. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 471 placed from the prism, must be such as will allow the rays to diverge sufficiently for the required colour to fill the transmit- ting holes ; and the balls of the thermometers placed under them ought to be less than these holes, that the projected rays may pass around them, and shew their proper adjustment. The dia- meters of mine, used for this purpose, are 21 tenths of an inch. g4th Experiment. I placed my apparatus at five feet from the prism, and so as to cause the red-making rays to fall between the parallel lines, in order to find what heat-making rays would come to the ther- mometer along with them. Red rays. . __. Bluish-white glass. Therm. A, ; Therm. B. or saseyts TBpt «758 5 77s W762... 2: 14'S 695 From this experiment it appears, that when a thousand red- making rays fall on each transmitting hole, 975 of them, if they also be the heat-making rays, are stopped by the bluish-white glass which covers one of these holes; or, what requires no other proof than the experiment itself; that 375 rays of heat, of the same aor area with the red’ ea are ee ee by this glass. - 95th Experiment. Red rays. Flint glass. 75% ; Ree ois ies 76Z,..12:15 = 857 This glass stops only 143 rays of heat~ which are of the same refrangibility with the red rays. 3Pe 472 Dr. HERSCHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and 96th Experiment. Red rays. Crown glass. 0 75% 756 yuo 5 78 7750+ 2% 15 = ,706 This glass stops 294, rays of the same sort of heat. 97th Experiment. Red rays. Coach glass. 4 ° 545 53% 5 55% 54% ...14:1 = ,800 It stops 200 rays of the same sort of heat. 98th Experiment. Red rays. Iceland crystal, o 705 15 is 78 m7t...12: 14 = 800 ' This substance stops 200 rays of the same sort of heat. ggth Experiment. Red rays. - Calcinable talc. ’ 3 I ve 514 b1¢ 5 53% 522....12:15 = ,867 It stops 133 rays of the same sort of heat. 100th Experiment. Red rays. Dark-red glass. o! 767 765 5 783 77k 1G tt 308 This glass stops 692 rays of the same sort of heat. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 473 1o1ist Experiment. Red rays. Orange glass. o 75 Phe), 5 Ty Tie... 2; 1 == ,500 It stops 500 rays of the same sort of heat. 102d Experiment. Red rays. Yellow glass. 158 75 762 755. -.14:2 = 583 It stops 417 rays of the same sort of heat. 103d Experiment. _ Red rays. - Pale-green glass. oO’ Aa 748 5 763 75 ++. iF Al2 It stops 588 rays of the same sort of heat. 104th Experiment. Red rays. Dark-green glass. o 683 682 5 7s 6o¢...13:3 = ,214 It stops 786 rays of the same sort of heat. 105th Experiment. Red rays. Bluish-green glass. o! 69 682 5 any for 692...13:2== ,538 It stops 462 rays of the same sort of heat. 474 Dr. Herscuen’s Experiments on the solar, and 106th Experiment. Red rays. Pale-blue glass. ' s rot e 69% 692 5 704 692...14:2 = ,300 It stops 700 rays of the same sort of heat. 107th Experiment. Red rays, Dark-blue glass. o! 67 672 5 — 682 682.,..14:12 = ,929 This glass stops only 71 rays of the same sort of heat. 108th Experiment. Red rayss Indigo glass. ’ I fe) 682 68i 5 : TOL 691...2:14 = ,633 It stops 367 rays of the same sort of heat. 109th Experiment. Red rays. Pale-indigo glass. nO; 69 682 i este! BON 2 2 ee ae It stops 313 rays of the same sort of heat. ie 110th Experiment. Red rays. Purple glass. o! | 665 56 5 2 TOS 57k... 92: 1b = 4556 It stops 44.4 rays of the same sort of heat, | on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. ATS 111th Experiment. Red rays, Violet glass. ot 578 57 5 59+ 581...12:14 = 600 It stops 400 rays of the same sort of heat. 112%b Experiment. Red rays. Crown glass; one side rubbed on emery, rough side exposed. ' : A 3 0 49% 49 | 5 ional. 502...22:13=> 611 * This glass, so prepared, stops 389 scattered rays of the same sort of heat. 113th Experiment. Red rays. Coach glass; one side rubbed on emery, rough side exposed. ! 3 7 O 538 525 I 3 Bue Zee 5 55% 534 +-+14 + ¢ = 2500 It stops 500 scattered rays of the same sort of heat. 114th Experiment. Red rays. Crown glass; both sides rubbed on emery. ’ 5 . 58 49s 5 523 Gla, «,.'25 2 15 = 529 It stops 471 scattered rays of the same sort of heat. 115th Experiment. Red rays. Coach glass; both sides rubbed on emery, , I 0 54 534 5 55z 54... 15:i= ,167 It stops 839 scattered rays of the same sort of heat. 476 Dr. HerscueEn’s Experiments on the solar, and 116tb Experiment. Red rays. Calcined talc. - , I I © d1¢ 5°F 5 533 Sig +++ 297g = 263 This substance stops 737 scattered rays of the same sort of heat. Transmission of Fire-Heat through various Substances. When the same fire is to give an equal heat to two thermo- meters, at some short distance from each other, it becomes highly necessary that there should be a place of considerable dimensions in its centre, where it may burn with an equal glow, and without flame or smoke. To obtain this, I used a grate 19 inches broad, and 82 high, having only three bars, which. divide the fire into three large openings. In the centre of the | middle one of these, when the grate is well filled with large coals or coke, we may, with proper management, keep up the required equality of radiance. The apparatus I have used is of the following construction.* A screen of wood, g feet 6 inches high, and g feet broad, lined towards the fire with plates of iron, has two holes, 2 of an inch in diameter, and at the distance of 21 inches from each other, one on each side of the middle of the screen, and of a height that will answer to the centre of the fire. 22 inches under the centre of the holes is a shelf, about 22 inches long and 4 broad, on which are placed two thermometers, in opposite direc-_ tions, fixed on proper stands, to bring the balls, quite disen- gaged from the scales, directly 2 inches behind the transmitting * See Plate XXIV. ; = a ‘on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. M77" holes. A small thin wooden partition is run up between the thermometers, to prevent the heat transmitted through one hole from coming to the thermometer belonging to the other. The screen is fixed upon a light frame, which fits exactly into the opening of the front of the marble chimney-piece ; and the ends of the frame are of a length which, when the screen is placed before the fire, will just bring the transmitting holes to be 64 inches from the front bars of the grate. A large wooden cover, also plated with iron, shuts up the transmitting holes on the side next to the fire; but may be drawn up by a string on the outside, so as to open oa when required. ; Two assistant thermometers are placed on proper stands, to bring their balls to the same distance from the screen as those which receive the heat of the fire; but removed sideways as far as necessary, to put them out of the reach of any rays that pass obliquely through the transmitting holes. They are to indicate any change of temperature that may take place during the time of the experiment: for, notwithstanding the largeness of the screen, some heat will find its way round and over it; and this acting as a general cause, its effect must be allowed for. 117th Experiment. ‘Having tried the apparatus sufficiently to find that:the ther- mometers exposed to the transmitting holes would generally receive 20 or more degrees of heat, without differing more than sometimes 4 or at most. t of a degree, I now placed the bluish- white glass of the o4th experiment upon a support prepared for the purpose, so as closely to cover one of the transmitting holes. A smail spring, moveable on its centre, is always turned against MDCCC. 39 478 Dr. HErscuE.’s Experiments on the solar, and the upper part of the transmitting pean to hs them in lee situation. | | | Fire. Bluish-white glass, : o! 66 eats , ; 5 86 71.1290: 5 = 250 This glass stops 750 rays of fire-heat. By looking through it, at the same place in the fire, after the screen was removed, in. order to cool the apparatus for the next experiment, I found that this glass can hardly be said to stop any of the light of the fire. 118¢h Experiment. Fire. Flint glass. ee 67 Biba ora 5 87 72 i VO toh Reg 2eL It stops 750 rays of fire-heat. 119th Experiment. Fire. Crown glass. o’ 67 67 5 863 72F + 19S: Fy = 278 It stops 722 rays of fire-heat. 120th Experiment. att Fire. Coach glass. ees 863 73 +++ 19%: 53 = 286 | It stops 714, rays of fire-heat. 121ist Experiment. Fire. Iceland crystal. O° 68 68.) | 5 995 7B G++ + 297% = 944 This substance stops 756 rays of fire-heat, on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 479 129d Experiment. I took now the piece of talc used in the goth experiment, and, placing it over the transmitting hole, I had the following result. But, as the unexpected event of a calcination, which took place, was attended with circumstances that ought to be noticed, I shall, instead of the usual abridgment of the experiments, give this at full length. . Fire. Talc. Therm. D. Therm. C. 0’ 65 Mes 1 79, Sia Ae TG. = OSG 2 SMR 683....12 : 3% = ,281 Bae 69x... 154: 44 = ,290 Ay, 83 Fe neh beste te TEs beam yas e Geb Sa Lee 20, 2 Boa OB _ This substance stops 719 rays of fire-heat. * 1 am now to point out the singularity of this experiment; which consists, as we may see by the above register of it, in the apparently regular continuance of its power of transmitting heat, while its capacity of transmitting light was totally destroyed. For, when I placed this piece of talc over the hole in the screen, it was extremely transparent, as this substance is generally known to be; and yet, when. the experiment was over, it ap-~ peared of a beautiful white colour; and its power of transmitting light was so totally destroyed, that even the sun in the meridian could not be perceived through it. Now, had the power of trans- mitting heat through this substance been really uniform during all the five minutes, it would have been quite a new phenome- ‘non; as all my experiments are attended with a regular increase 3Q2 _ 480 Dr. HerscuE’s Experiments on the solar, and of it; but since, by calcination, the talc lost much of its trans- mitting power, we may easily account for this unexpected regularity. ) rai Moot] 123d Experiment. — 1? grtiSekey ims Fire, Very dark red glass. j ge’ Sides: 66 66 894 75 +++ 23529 = .387 This glass stops 619 rays of fire-heat. 124th Experiment. Fire. Dark-red glass. oO’ 67 67 ip 923 78...2953:11 = ,427 This glass, which stops g99,8 rays of candle-light, stops only 573 rays of fire-heat; whereas my piece of thick flint glass, which stops no more than g1 rays of that light, stops no less than 750 of fire-heat. It does not appear, by looking through these glasses, that there is a difference in their disposition to transmit candle-light or fire-light. : Hine 125th Experiment. Fire. Orange glass. Oo! 66 66 5 Pe? Bo FAS) An VES Be7 It stops 643 rays of fire-heat. . 126th Experiment. Fire. Yellow glass. + IG911 o! 617 | 614 . unin AY ils 5 83 683...21:7£.cor.—14°.202: 61 = ,315 on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 4814 This experiment being made early in the morning, before the temperature of the room was come to its usual height, the assistant thermometers shewed a gradual rising of 14 degree in the 5 minutes: they are in general very steady. The glass stops 685 rays of fire-heat. 107th Experiment. Fire. Pale-green glass. o’ 65% 654 | 5 85 7i3....194:6 = ,g12 It stops 688 rays of fire-heat. 1282b Experiment. Fire. . Dark-green glass, o 68 68 3 3 \3 + pd ° 5 - 883 73% ...20%: 54 COr.— 4) = 255 It stops 74,5 rays of fire-heat. 129th Experiment. Fire. Bluish-green glass. of 68+ 68L 5 87 7Ag...1823 53 = ,904 It stops 696 rays of fire-heat: 130th Experiment. Fire. Pale-blue glass. of 682 ais 5 867 734 °-° 174° 55 = 1324 | It stops 676 rays of fire-heat. bie Dr. Hesoury’s Experi Clot partieerom od ri Webi shies iis ott Srhats it PUPS Gat 3 ay? gist E. See ri ooTgonhy gt to wert hy. bicep so ares i vale oll ov baie -viov Leveyegaih ois yotkdes eons L 5 84E 78.4 17 PO. COn mea idsinaieions rays of frecheat. 1b orearyad) bo sank i L. OF@s sgoditeepavitaent, ai Fire. Indigo glass. om y ‘O: Oo Si > — 6gt qt -- 695 5 ; o as ae % 5 852... 73 get -aOeog seit | It stops 721 rays of fire-heat. | ¥ wt ey yt dake ae wi {Age ose a aes Experinent. od dns ees Pale indigo glass. 80 z ‘o mol k = 00 OEE HOE. 9 Bye cee agg Se 5 ae Boe ai ta rye: GE con 45 It stops 655 rays of fire-heat. rh eat beet gt ois CHR sk Oe f [ Biviastirs oe ie Experiment. | LS Bine. Purple glass, 4 coe qe a Saas r f ) ‘glee i} » Ai ” etd ‘ LO " he oy) Gg: $61. Boea 7 eae > 3) ye ee 5 B31 4 ral oa one It stops 679 rays of Sperbetty yet, berg) ice de ae 135th Experiment, er Lok : Fire. —sCViolet glass. Vi ¢€ 28 eis evs i po af 662 + SRE a! 661 's 198° f 5 861 74k 1. ./20 07 It stops 615 rays of fire-heat, — ' H aw ss VAotes se on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 483: 136th Experiment. Fire. , Crown glass; one side rubbed on emery. o! 673 673 5 895 793), 901 : GL = 277 This glass, so prepared, stops 729 scattered rays of fire-heat. 137th Experiment Fire, Coach glass ; one side rubbed on emery. o! 68 3 674 5 O7E 72t 4195 : Ag = 5242 It stops 758 scattered rays of fire-heat. 138th Experiment. Fire. - Crown glass; both sides rubbed on emery, o! 681 68 ie | oe 924 TQ 29") > f= ,209 It stops 791 scattered rays of fire-heat. 139th Experiment. Fire. Coach glass; both sides rubbed on emery. of 67 67 ea 5 88 7oL... 21: 34.cor, — 2° = ,146 It stops 854, scattered rays of fire-heat. 140th Experiment. Eire Crown glass. } One side of each rubbed on i Coach glass. } emery. oy 66 66 5 86 692....20: 92. cor, —1°== ,151 These glasses stop 849 scattered rays of fire-heat. 14gast Experiment. ! _ § Crown glass. sides of each WYSE aH iE ire. , phi {Coach gi} ener se fou ge 663 \ y cy : 5 Vela Te eget a el _ These pill stop es scattered ‘rays ‘of fire-heat. 142d Experiment. Fire. ~~ The four glasses of the two preceding experiments pat penis aD 4 a tg Oo! 66 BE oe oe res a) Ri 4 4 These four glasses stop 902 ae ra ys Wee feat isd Teapareaay |, \? Nien ‘Fire. Olive colour, burnt Baower Gi onmne | oo " 2 oO! 3 632 tat 633 we are aitiheag 6 4 (gO SOob Bgl ined nee Bt Abie e sigh This oe vi sete scattered rays of dvo-leab ag Howes i 4 7 14 sitet be: boat doithy ow) set Weis te oi vat Experiment, robb WwW cron el iii] Piney, PAPE Tighe 4 bi t Ys3 ylddianv x 661 665 hae Q a 5 83h} > 68 2p age — This substance stops 912 pee one fir turned a little yellow by the exposure. © 145th Experiment. mire JO Bye Linemery ry) 4 o! 633 . 633 B45 ‘2 nGqan on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 48.5 146th Experiment. Fire. White persian. of 652 65% 5 — Sit 683 ...153: 93 =,171 This substance stops 829 scattered rays of fire-heat. 147th Experiment. Fire, Black muslin. oO! 66 66 t if I. I 1.0 + om 5 Sot 7oL... 164: 44 . cor. + 2° = ,294 This substance stops 706 scattered rays of fire-heat. Transmission of the invisible Rays of solar Heat. The same apparatus which I have used for the transmission — of coloured prismatic rays,* will also do for the invisible part of the heat spectrum: it is only required to add two or three more parallel lines, one-tenth of an inch from each other, be- low the two which inclose the transmitting holes, in order to use them for directing the invisible rays of heat, by the position of the visible rays of light, to fall on the place required for coming to the thermometers. 148th Experiment. ) Invisible rays. Bluish-white glass. 0 48 47 5 49% Abe. ++ 14515 = 929 This glass stops only 71 invisible rays of heat. “# See Plate XXII. Fig. 3. MDCCC. gR 486 Dr. HeERscueEn’s Experiments on the solar, and 149th Experiment. ! "9 Invisible rays. Flint glass. fi: S 50% 495 5 52 i §lg. We: 1 = 1,006 _ This glass stops no invisible rays of heat. 150th Experiment. Invisible rays. _ Crown glass. , I 3 e Sipe AOE akg 5 512 502...13:15 = 818 It stops 182 invisible rays of heat. oT 151st Experiment. Invisible rays. Coach glass. I Tis b42 53¢ | SA T+ 3 —— 55% 54 eee ix ie — 9857 It stops 149 invisible rays of heat. 152d Experiment. Invisible rays. ~~ Calcinable talc. ’ 3 3 ie) d1g Wee 505 ~o 7 vi Ds pee 5 525 $1g---15:14 =.,750 This substance stops 250 invisible rays of heat. 153d Experiment. Invisible rays. _ _ Dark-red glass. / O adh eal APA 25) | 5 485 ADR ++ 121 = 1,000. This glass stops no invisible rays of heat. This accounts for the strong sensation of heat felt by the eye, in looking at ; myoOrscr tT 4 DIIIULM on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 487 the sun through a telescope, when red darkening glasses are used. — | 154tb Experiment. Invisible rays. Orange glass. ST eh Sh 2, OS! oR | 5 53° 52.2 1g a= 727 It stops 279 invisible rays of heat. 155th Experiment. : Invisible rays. Yellow glass. Pr gn: eas ° Dag jt aah Beer 53 Hote he Uk == 5800 It stops 200 invisible rays of heat. (156th Experiment. _ Invisible rays. Pale-green glass. ee ek Baz ces 5 525 f1g...122 = 625 It stops 375 invisible rays of heat. 157th Experiment. Invisible rays. Dark-green glass. erie it Bae 512 3 5 525 52...1:5=,§00 It stops 500 invisible rays of heat. (158th Experiment. Invisible rays. Bluish-green glass. iam 58 525 Swe 54g | It stops 800 invisible rays of heat. 3g3Re2 488 Dr. HERscuHeE.’s Experiments on the solar, and 159th Experiment. ae been Invisible rays. _ Pale-blue glass. o 51g 51g , I ° — 5 53% §15....15 33 = 417 It stops 589 invisible rays of heat. 160th Experiment. Invisible rays. Dark-blue glass. ’ 7 5 i) Oey iy, dle 5.4; 525 52e ++ ZF = 833 It stops 167 invisible rays of heat. 161st Experiment. Invisible rays. Indigo glass. , 7 I o 525 524 1 ary — 5 548 53 +--+ 12: e500 It stops 500 invisible rays of heat. 162d Experiment. Invisible rays. Pale-indigo glass. of 523 525 rey 533 §22...1:4==,750 It stops 250 invisible rays of heat. 163d Experiment. | Invisible rays. Purple glass. o! 515 50% & 52% 513...13:1== 4,727 It stops 273 invisible rays of heat. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 489 164th Experiment. Invisible rays, Violet glass. t 3 ° 53 525 I o 3 es 5 f 54g 53¢+--1:5=,5750 It stops 250 invisible rays of heat. 165th Experiment. Invisible rays. Crown glass; one side rubbed on emery, rough side exposed. I if 3 ° 49% 487 3 I phate bo pees 5 504 494 ---14¢: 5 = 400 This glass, so prepared, stops 600 scattered invisible rays of heat. | 166th Experiment. Invisible rays. Coach glass ; one side rubbed on emery, rough side exposed. o' 54 538 5 55 54-..15:2 = ,500 It stops 500 scattered invisible rays of heat. 167th Experiment. Invisible rays. Crown glass; both sides rubbed on emery. o! 50 ‘ 49g 5 51g AQ ---1 y= > = 4,00 It stops 600 scattered invisible rays of heat. AIM 168th Experiment. Invisible rays. Coach glass; both sides rubbed on emery. 54g «4g 5 «55s 543... 5:5 = ,286 It stops 714, scattered invisible rays of heat. oO’ 49° Dr. HerscueEx’s Experiments on the solar, and 169th Experiment. Invisible rays. ~ Calcined talc. r 7 © 51g 505 : 5 53 Sir. sldee ye ie This substance stops 889 scattered invisible rays of heat. Transmission of invisible terrestrial Heat. This is perhaps the most extensive and most interesting of all the articles we have to investigate. Dark heat is with us the most common of all; and its passage from one body into another, is what it highly concerns us‘to trace out. The slightest change of temperature denotes the motion of invisible heat ; and if we could be fully informed about the method of its trans- mission, much light would be thrown on what now still remains a mysterious subject. It must be remembered, that in the fol- lowing experiments, I only mean to point out the transmission -of such dark heat as I have before proved to consist of rays, without inquiring whether there be-any other than such existing. My apparatus for these experiments is as follows.* A box 12 inches long, 53 broad, and g deep, has a partition through- out its whole length, which divides it into two parts. At one end of each division is a hole 3 3 inch in diameter; and each di- vision contains.a idennaece with its ball exposed to the hole, and at one inch distance from the outside of the box. Four inches of the box, next to the holes, are covered; the rest is open. In the front of it is a narrow slip of wood, on which may rest any glass to:be tried; and it is held close to the wood at the top, by a small spring applied against it. Two screws are planted upon the front, one on .each sides rire may be * See Plate XXV. Figy1 : on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 491 drawn out or screwed in, by way of accurately adjusting the distance of the thermometer from the line of action. In order to procure invisible terrestrial heat, I have tried many different ways, but a stove is the most commodious of them. Iron isa substance that transmits invisible heat very readily ; while, at the same time, it will most effectually inter- cept every visible ray of the fire by which it is heated, provided that be not carried to any great excess. I therefore made use of an iron stove,* having four flat sides, and being constructed so as to exclude all appearance of light. I had it placed close to a wall, that the pipe which conveys away smoke might not scatter heat into the room. The thermometer box, when experiments are to be made, is to be put into an arrangement of twelve bricks, placed on a stand, with casters: -+ these bricks, when the stand is rolled close to the stove, which must not be done till an experiment is to begin, form an inclosure, just fitting round the sides, bot- tom, and covered part of the top of the thermometer box, and completely guard it against the heat of the stove. The box is then shoved into the brick opening, close to the iron side of the stove, where the two front screws, coming into contact with the iron plate, give the thermometers their proper’ distance ; which, in the following experiments, has been such as. to bring the most advanced part of the balls to one inch and four-tenths from the hot iron. It will be necessary to remark, that on calculating the trans- missions for the fifth minute, I found that it would not be doing justice to the stopping power of the glasses, to take so. long a time; for, notwithstanding the use of brickwork, and ne * See Plate XXV. Fig. 2, + See Fig. 3. 492 Dr. HERscuHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and precaution I had taken, of having two sets of it, that one might be cooling while the other was employed, and though neither of them was ever very hot, yet I found that so much heat came to the box, that when it was taken out of the bricks, in order to be cooled, the thermometers continued still to rise, at an ave- rage, about two degrees higher than they were. I have therefore now taken the third minute, as a much safer way to come at the truth. | 170th Experiment. Stove. Bluish-white glass. ' 3 fe) 56 Dai 3 ; . —a 3 59% 50g -- - 353 14 = 5800 This glass stops 700 invisible rays of heat. 171st Experiment. Stove. Flint glass. o! 53% 532 3 558 54g +++ 152 5 = 467— It stops 539 invisible rays of heat. 172d Experiment. Stove. Crown glass. _ QO’ 50f 504 3 53% S1G 6 251 F217 It stops 783 invisible rays of heat. 173d Experiment. Stove. Coach glass. ] I ; I 7 fe) 5°97 5°> 3 : 52t lf... 223 = 4875 It stops 625 invisible rays of heat, _ on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 493 174th Experiment. Stove. Iceland crystal. 0" 47 405 tity Sac 485+. - 75! 251274 This substance stops 726 invisible rays of heat. 175th Experiment. Stoves Calcinable tale, oF, Rep 1a 51z I I Oe Go 3 ie 54g. O51 23 = 404 At the end of five minutes, when the box was taken out of the bricks, the talc was perfectly turned into a scattering sub- stance: as such, it stops 596 scattered invisible rays of heat. The sun cannot be seen through it; but this I find is chiefly owing to its scattering disposition. It stops however 997 scat- tered rays of light. | 176th Experiment. Stove. Dark red glass. oO’ 58 58 3 64,2 Got ...63:25=,970 This glass stops 690 invisible rays of heat. 177th Experiment. Stove. Orange glass. or 552 554 3 BEN 57k +++ 5¢1 25,476 It stops 524, invisible rays of heat. MDCCC, 35 ‘Stove. - Yellow glass. Phy. o’ vey 573 7k " 3 vA 613 a eke It stops 469 invisible rays of heat. NA aD 179th Experiment. = _ Stove. __ Pale-green glass. o! pe 112 Sn EHS 38 564 e" os i .. Ado: 12 ee 48 38 ; Tt oe 632 invisible rays of heat. NS vets i : Ke Aird satis 180tb cysts ii ova, es) Sse ‘Stove. Darkegreen glass. =>) 4 a 4852.10 4985 | 8 58% er eee It stops 700 invisible rays of heat. | Bae 181st Experiment. 1 ya ‘ Stove. _ Bluish-green glass. oo 7 O10) seat TE ath aay meeea ae 3 555 ee It stops 556 eee rays oft heats "01°." VEN 182d En HB 9 Stove. - “Pale-blue ek pageaiy int e ‘Bie 87s es O58 It.stops 548 invisible sok of heat. _ on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 495 183d Experiment. Stove, Dark-blue glass, 885 58 5 55e 535 +°° It stops 632 invisible rays of heat. 184th Experiment. Stove. Indigo plass. e. 54ce 54 3 59 555 + ° ‘It stops 659 invisible rays of heat. 185th Experiment. Stove, Pale indigo glass, /; ; ° 537 535 3 3 59% 55G ++: _ It stops 700 inyisible rays of heat. 186) Experiment. Stove. Purple glass. y 3 I - semen 4 ple : 3 8 563 523 - It stops 730 invisible rays of heat. 187th Experiment. * Stove. ; Violet glass. 7 I 12) 51 Ws 3 Sys oo°°: It stops 684, invisible rays of heat. A 382 vee Texoma 1g = 5341 : 1f = .g00 a eS ~~ 496 Dr. Herscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and 188th Experiment. Stove. _ Crown glass; one side rubbed on emery. Ul I I 0 494 * 494 3 . I 3 54 505 +++ 5: 1y = ,225 This glass, so prepared, stops 775 invisible rays of scattered heat. | 189th Experiment. Stove. Coach glass ; one side rubbed on emery, o! 50 50 I 7 Ze 7, — 3 574 51g +++ 7ei le = 259 It stops 741 invisible rays of scattered heat. 190th Experiment. Stove. Crown glass; both sides rubbed on emery. oO’ 52 52 3 58 590. Os dome HOY, It stops 833 invisible rays of scattered heat. 191st Experiment. Stove. Coach glass; both sides rubbed on emery. of 52 52 ity) 4 | I 3 Ile — a Be 55¢ 523... 9722 => ,291 It stops 769 invisible rays of scattered heat. 192d Experiment. Stove. Olive colour, burnt in glass. Bie NA I ; I ) blz blz 3 57 582 -++ 5712 = 804 It stops 636 invisible rays of scattered heat. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 497 193d Experiment. Stove. White paper. o! 52 52 8 57% Sdq +++ 5322 This substance stops only 535 invisible rays of scattered heat. 194th Experiment. Stove. Linen, or 53% 53% 3 57% 55a ++ de? 2s = 5543 It stops 457 invisible rays of scattered heat. ARTICLE vi.—Scattering of Solar Heat. We are now come to a branch of our-inquiry which, from its novelty, would deserve a fuller investigation than we can at present enter into. The scattering of heat, is a reflection of it on the rough surfaces of bodies: it is therefore a principle of general influence, since all bodies, even the most polished, are sufficiently rough to scatter heat in all directions. In order, there- fore, to compare the effect of rough surfaces on heat with their effect on light, I have made a number of experiments, from which the following are selected, for the purpose of our intended comparative view. The apparatus I have used for scattering solar heat, is like that which served for transmissions;* but here the holes through which the sun’s rays enter,{ are very exactly 14 inch in diameter each; and are chamferred away on the under side;- * See Plate XXI, Fig. 1. + See Plate XXII. Fig. 4. -“ 498 Dr, Herscue's Experiments on the solar, and that no re-scattering may take place in the thickness of the covering board: the distance of the centre of the holes is 4 inches. A little more than an inch below, and under the centre of the holes, are the balls of the small thermometers A and B, well shaded from the direct rays of the sun, by small slips of wood, of the shape of the ball, and of that part of the stem which is exposed. Under each thermometer is a small tablet,* on which the an jects intended for scattering the sun’s rays are to be placed. The tablets are contrived so as to bring the objects perpendi~ cularly under the openings, and under the centre of the balls of the thermometers, at the distance of exactly one inch from them. Every thing being thus alike on both sides of the box, it is evident, from the equality of the holes, that an equal num~ ber of solar rays will fall on each object, and will by them be scattered back on the thermometers, at equal angles, and equal distances. The first five experiments that follow, were made with an apparatus somewhat different from the one here described ; and, though the result of them may not be so accurate as if they had been made with the present one, I must give them as they are, since time will not allow of a repetition. 195th Experiment. Sun. Message card scattering, o Bn a 64, ‘| 3 4 3 ° 3 —= a 5 692 663 2 $7? 2 = 5413 Here an object of a white colour, 3,6 inches long, and 2,6 broad, scattered, in § minutes, 413 rays of heat back upon one * See Plate XXII. Fig. 5. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 499 thermometer, while the other received a thousand, directly from the sun. Now, in order the better to compare the proportion of light and heat scattered by different objects, we shall put these 4,13 rays equal to 1000; or, which is nearly the same, multiply them by 2,421. Then, since the message card also scatters 1000 rays of light, as will be found ina table at the end of the transmission table, our present object may be made a standard for a comparison with the four following ones. 196th Experiment. Sun. Pink-coloured paper scattering. © Tou 64, 64, 5 70 663....6:93 = 498 Here a piece of pink-coloured paper, of the same ‘dimensions with the card of the last experiment, and placed ‘in :the same situation, scattered, as we find by the same mode of multipli- cation, 1060 rays of heat ; and, by our table, it scatters 51 3 of light. 197th Experiment. Sun. Pale-green paper scattering, U LE BSS I . O45 O45 7 i 3 > I — ie 692 664... 52: 21 = ,370 This piece of paper scatters 896 rays of heat, and 549 of light. 198th Experiment. Sun. Dark-green paper scattering, , Sis ai x 643 - 65% 5 OOS 673, 127 = 4513 This paper scatters 1242 rays of heat, ne bea 308 of light. Z 500 Dr. Herscuen’s Experiments on the solar, and 199th Experiment. i me groxy Sun. Black paper scattering. » 65% 3 66 . 703 68...45:2 = ,410 This paper scatters 993 rays of heat, and 490 of light. From these experiments it seems to be evident, that in scat- tering heat, the colour of the object is out of the question ; or, at least, that it is no otherwise concerned than as far as it may influence the texture of the surface of bodies. For here we find that pale-green, which is brighter, or scatters more light, than dark-green, yet scatters less heat. Even black, so generally known to scatter but little light, scatters much heat. But, in - order to put this surmise to a fairer trial, I made the following experiments with my new machine. 200th Experiment. I covered one of the tablets with white paper, and the other with black. The quantity of sunshine admitted through the two openings, of 14 inch in diameter each, being equal, I found the heat scattered on both thermometers to be as follows. White paper. Black paper scattering. oO (cn 72 . 5 753 75 +++ 35°83 = 774 I turned now the tablets, and had, b Black paper. White paper scattering, o’ : 13% 724 5 aD 75g +++ 23+ 3% = 760 These results, agreeing sufficiently well together, shew that if we make white paper our standard, and suppose it to scatter - on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 5O1 1000 rays of heat, and 1000 of light, then will black paper scat- ter 767 rays of heat, and 420 of light. 201st Experiment. White paper. Black muslin scattering. of 3 3 - 134 734 3 e I = 5 77% 77 -++ 4235 = 813 This scatters 813 rays of heat; and, when it is suspended so that the rays which pass through it may not be reflected, it scatters only 64 rays of light. | 202d Experiment. As my intention at present was to find a black substance that should scatter more heat than a white one, I thought it would be the readiest way to examine the white and black objects separately, that of all the white ones I might afterwards take _ that which scattered least, and compare it with the black one which scattered most. White paper. White linen scattering. , 7 ° 746 75 6) (i ee 5 79 79% +++ 4g * 4g == 1,000 These objects scatter heat equally, and very nearly also light; for our table gives for linen 1008. : 203d Experiment. White paper. White cotton scattering, 7 = ° 742 745 5 783 78L...92: 97 = 1,000 These objects scatter heat equally. .White cotton scatters 1054, rays of light. MDCCC. 3T 502 Dr. Herscuen’s Experiments on the solar, and ins Jowbto paiaaiie 204th Experiment. +o) ane ' White paper. White muslin scattering, es 73% 73% ; tt 5 ‘ub Rela 705 + Bz = 875” White muslin scatters 875 rays of heat, and 827 of light. 205th Experiment. . White paper. White persian scattering, > co Og ee 14 dah 775 ss 7BE« + 8318E = 1,074 White persian-scatters 1074, rays of heat; and, when sus- pended like the black muslin in the 201st experiment, it scat- ters 671 rays of light, | 206th Experiment. White paper. | White knit worsted ; rough side outwards. ’ 3 é, Ss 51 514 5 3 5. — White worsted scatters 1231 rays of heat, and 620 of light. 207th Experiment. White paper, White chamois leather; the smooth side exposed. ' Mt ks 5 5 : 74 746 ie i ~ 983 79». + 922 Ae = 110g White chamois leather scatters 1167 rays of heat, and 1228 of light. , 208th Experiment. Black paper. . Black velvet scattering. — Vig (orm 4 88 he & 79% 80...35:4¢==4,179 on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. ~- 503 Making now black paper the standard, and supposing it to scatter 1000 rays of heat, and the same of light, then black vel- vet scatters 1179 rays of heat, and only 17 of light. This last number we obtain, by dividing the tabular number 7, for black velvet, by ,42, which is the proportion of black paper to white. 209th Experiment. Black paper. Black muslin scattering, ’ I © 75% 754 , I 1D 7 — 5 73 (Gu 3708" Span +o Black muslin scatters 1192 rays of heat, and 4g of light. 210th Experiment. Black paper. Black satin scattering. U I ‘ I fe) 7 6£ 765 5 79 802...293: 3% = 1,409 Black satin scatters 1409 rays of heat, and 24g of light. 211th Experiment. Having now ascertained, that of all the white and black sub- stances I had tried, white muslin scatters the least, and: black satin the most heat, I placed the former on one tablet, while the latter was put on the other. White muslin. . Black satin scattering. 3 : ( 3 or 76% 78% 5 80 Sot... 3%: 3% = 1,069 Here the black object scattered more heat than the white one; but, in order to try again the equality of the tablets and apparatus, I placed the objects under the opposite thermome- ters, and had as follows. 3T2 504, Dr. HERSCHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and Black satin. White muslin scattering. or 78 ; 78 . 5 802 ! Sol... 25: 295 == 1,050 So that, notwithstanding some little difference in the appa- ratus, or other unavoidable circumstances, the black object gave again the greatest scattering of heat; and consequently, as no colour can be more opposite than black and white, colour can have no concern in the laws that-relate to the scattering of heat. | 212th Experiment. I wished now to try some experiments of the scattering power of metals, and had some plates of iron, brass, and copper, two inches square, set flat, and smooth-filed, by round strokes. Iron.’ Copper scattering. of 74 734 5 785 776 +++ 42 * 4g = 0917 213th Experiment. — Tin foil. Gold-leaf paper scattering. o! 74 74 5 774 793 +++ 35+ 53 = 1,500 But the tin foil was considerably tarnished. 214th Experiment. Finding the form of the last experiments inconvenient, for want of a standard, I had recourse again to white paper. : White paper. Tin foil scattering. — o! 50% 513) ody hoor 3 Pf i e ae —— 5 Li B88 5AG ++ Ga 25 = 885 This substance scatters 885 rays of heat, and 8483 of light. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 505 215th Experiment. White paper. Tron. eh 51g 537 5 54g 55x + +9: 24 = 4750 Some time having elapsed between the former observation and the present one, this plate of iron was not now so bright as before, and seems to have suffered more than brass or copper from having been laid by: it scatters now only 750 rays of heat, and 10014 of light. 216th Experiment. White paper. Brass. f I of 50 51z tN rs es Sie eit 538 55% +++ 8g * 4g = 1,320 It scatters 1920 rays of heat, and no less than 43858 of light. | 217th Experiment. White paper, _ Copper. 49% 51g 53 555 +++ 3574 = 1,280 It: scatters 1280 rays of heat, and 13128 a light. 218th Experiment. White paper. Gold-leaf paper. Sdea 558 563 50...15: 5 =.357 I changed the tablets to see what difference there might be. Gold paper. White paper. 55% 555 505 573% ...4:15 = 4500 506 Dr. Henscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and A mean between the two gives ,429. Gold paper, therefore, scatters only 429 rays of heat, and no less than 124371 rays of light. 219th Experiment. Black velvet. Gold paper scattering. ro 52 ! 51% 5 53% 525-6 151 GS 558 I turned the tablets, in order to ascertain the difference. Gold paper. Black velvet. Oo’ 51 51% 5 514 53.-.%: 12 = 600 From a mean of both it appears, that when black velvet scatters 1000 rays of heat, and only 7 rays of light, gold paper, on the contrary, scatters no more than 578 rays of heat, but 124971 of light. : Art. vil.— Whether Light and Heat be occastoned by the same, or by different Rays, Before we enter into a discussion of this question, it appears to me that we are authorised, by the experiments which have been delivered in this Paper, to make certain conclusions, that will entirely alter the form of our inquiry. Thus, from the 18th experiment it appears, that 21 degrees of solar heat were given in one minute to a thermometer, by rays which had no power of illuminating objects, and which could: not be rendered visible, notwithstanding they were brought together in the focus of a burning lens, The same has also been proved of terrestrial heat, in the 9th experiment; where, in one minute, 39 degrees of it were given to a thermometer, by rays totally invisible, even — when condensed by a concave mirror. » Hence it is established, on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. . 507 by incontrovertible facts, that there are rays of heat, both solar and terrestrial, not endowed with a power of rendering objects visible. It has also been proved, by the whole tenour of our prismatic experiments, that this invisible heat is continued, from the be- ginning of the least refrangible rays towards the most refran- gible ones, in a series of uninterrupted gradation, from a gentle beginning to a certain maximum ; and that it afterwards declines, as uniformly, toa vanishing state. These phenomena have been ascertained by an instrument, which, figuratively speaking, we may call blind, and which, therefore, could give us no infor- mation about light; yet, by its faithful report, the thermometer, which is the instrument alluded to, can leave no doubt about the existence of the different degrees of heat in the prismatic spectrum. This consideration, as his been observed, must alter the form of our proposed inquiry; for the question being thus at least partly decided, since it is ascertained that we have rays of heat which give no light, it can only become a subject of inquiry, whether some of these heat-making rays may not have a power of rendering objects visible, superadded to their now already established power of heating bodies. This being the case, it is evident that the onus probandi ought to lie with those who are willing to establish such an hypo- thesis; for it does not appear that nature is in the habit of using one and the same mechanism with any two of our senses; withess the vibrations of air that make sound; the effluvia that occasion smells ; the particles that produce taste; the resistance or repulsive powers that affect the touch: all these are evi- dently suited to their respective organs of sense. Are we then 508 Dr. Herscue’s Experiments on the solar, and here, on the contrary, to suppose that the same mechanism should be the cause of such different sensations, as the delicate perceptions of vision, and the very grossest of all affections, which are common to the coarsest parts of our bodiegs when exposed to heat ? But, let us see what light may now be obtained from the several articles that have been discussed in this Paper. It has been shewn, that the effect of heat and of illumination may be represented by the two united spectra, which we have given.* Now, when these are compared, it appears that those who would have the rays of heat also to do the office of light, must be obliged to maintain the following arbitrary and revolting positions; namely, that a set of rays conveying heat, should all at once, in a certain part of the spectrum, begin to give a small degree of light; that this newly acquired power of illu- mination should increase, while the power of heating is on the decline; that when the illuminating principle is come to a maximum, it should, in its turn, also decline very rapidly, and vanish at the same time with the power of heating. How can effects that are so opposite be ascribed to the same cause? first of all, heat without light; next to this, decreasing heat, but increasing light; then again, decreasing heat and decreasing light. What modification can we suppose to be superadded to the heat-making power, that will produce such inconsistent results ? | We must not omit to mention another difference between light and heat, which may be gathered from the same article of the refrangibility of heat-making trays. It is, that though light and heat are both refrangible, the ratio of the sines of * See page 439, and Plate XX. . ' on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. | 509 incidence and refraction of the mean rays is not the same in both. Heat is evidently less refrangible than light; whether we take a mean refrangible ray of each, or, which I believe to be the better-way of proceeding, whether we take the maximum of heat and light separately. This appears, not only from the view we have taken of the two spectra already mentioned, but more evidently from the 23d experiment, by which we find, that heat cannot be collected by a lens, to the same focus where light is gathered together. | _ Our fifth article, in which an account has been given of the proportions of heat and light stopped by glasses and other sub- stances, will afford us now an ample field for pointing out a striking difference between these two principles. From the 24th to the goth experiment, we have the ene intercepted ey colourless substances as eae Tas_e I. Bluish-white glass stops 250 rays of heat, and 86 of light. White flint elass - - Qi a ie at Digg tat aha Greenish crown glass - 259 = - - 203 = -. Coach glass - - 214, 2 = Ge ats = Iceland crystal - - 244 - . = eon te tt Talc - = - 139 = - go -- KS Calcinable talc - - 184 - = ESBS He Now, by casting an eye on the above table, it will be seen immediately, that no kind of regularity takes place among the proportions of rays of one sort and of another, which are stopped in their passage. Heat and light seem to be entirely unconnected. The bluish-white and flint glasses, for instance, stop nearly three times as much heat as light; whereas, the MDCCC. 3U 510 Dr. Herscuen’s Experiments on the solar, and greenish crown glass stops only about one-fourth more of the former than of the latter; but, as coloured glasses take in a much greater range, I will now also give a tabular result of the experiments that have been given relating to them. TasB_e II. Very dark red glass stops 800 rays of heat, and 9992. of light. Dark-red - - 606 - - - g993%,- - Orange - - - 604, - = 779 = = Yellow - - - 333 - - - 819 - - Pale-green ~ - 6293 - — Kak eae Dark-green - 1, > BApe ct cpees bn Rea a Bluish-green - - 768 = ate “69 = = Pale-blue_ - = - 812 - - - 684 at ee Dark-blue ~ = 362 - -: SOL, vets Indigo ase = 6930 Pale-indigo - = - 532 ~ -- -978 - - Purple - =e BOR = - 993 - - Violet - - - 489 - - - 955 - - From this table, I shall also point out a few of the most remarkable results. A yellow glass, for instance, stops only 333 rays of heat, but stops 819 of light: on the contrary, a pale blue stops 812 rays of heat, and but 684 of light. Again, a dark blue glass stops only 362 rays of heat, but intercepts 801 of light; anda dark red glass stops no more than 606 rays of heat, and yet intercepts nearly all the light; scarcely one ray out of 5000 being able to make its way through it. Before I proceed to a more critical examination of these - results, it will be necessary to add also a table of the same kind, collected from the experiments with liquids. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 5ii Tasze III. Empty tube and 2 glasses stop 542 rays of heat, and 204, of light. Spring waters - el RES, ies ‘ Ey eae Sea water = att Se) ni GSs f 4 ma Spintof wines! Uo a e-P61e 2p - - 294 - - Gin - - - - 739 A = 626 - = Brandy - - - 794 = - - 996 - - To which may be joined, a table containing the stoppages occasioned by scattering substances. Tas_e IV. a Rough crown glass stops 464 rays of heat, and 854 of light. Rough coach glass - 571 - - = 879 - = The ist doubly rough - 667 ~~ - - 932 - - The ed doubly rough - 735 - 2 biel VGA reli un The @ first together - 698 4 = = HOBO cies eicen The 2 next together - 800 - - mi OZO cet yoem The 4 first together - 854 - ~ = ATS pret ie Olive colour, burnt in - 839 a = seis cm oa Calcined tale - - 867 - -= - g96 - - White paper - - (850 = z ae ar White linen - - gi6 - < BN Se ie White persian - - 760 - - - 916 - - Black muslin - - 714 - = - 794 = = We shall now enter more particularly into the subject of these four tables, that we may, if possible, find a criterion by which to judge whether heat and light can be occasioned 3U2 512 Dr. HerscuE.’s Experiments on the solar, and by the same rays or not. Now this I think will be obtained, if we can make it appear that stopping one sort of rays does not necessarily bring on a stoppage of the other sort ; for, if it can be shewn that heat and light are in this respect independent of each other, it will follow that they must be occasioned by diffe- rent rays; and I shall make all possible objections to the ar- guments I mean to draw from these tables, in order to shew that no hypothesis will evade the force of our conclusions. It has been noticed, that bluish-white and flint glasses stop nearly three times as much heat as light; whereas, crown glass stops only about one-fourth more of the former than of the latter. Now, in answer to this, it may be alleged, “ that the “ingredients of which the.former glasses are made, dispose «them probably to stop the invisible rays of heat, and that “ consequently a great interception of it may take place, with- out bringing on a necessity of stopping much light; and that, «©on the other hand, the different texture of crown glass may “‘ stop one sort of heat as well as the other, so that nearly an * equality in this respect may be produced.” When a hypothesis is made in order to explain any pheno- menon of nature, we ought to examine how it will agree with other facts ; and, in this case, we are already furnished with ex- periments, which are decidedly against the supposition that has been brought forward. For, the 148th and 149th experiments shew that the bluish-white and flint glasses transmit all, or nearly all, the invisible rays of solar heat; whereas crown glass, by the 150th experiment, stops a considerable number of them. But, to assist the objecting argument, let it be alleged, as has been proved by the g4th experiment, that our bluish-white glass stops a considerable portion of the heat that goes with the: on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 51g red rays; then, if the 86 rays of light which this glass stops, are supposed to be all of that sort, the heat which will be stopped in consequence, will, according to the experiment we have mentioned, amount to 86 multiplied by ,975, that is, 32 rays of heat; but, since 250 have been stopped, there: will remain 218 to be accounted for, In this calculation, a manifest concession has been made, which ought to be explained. When I mention 86 red-coloured or red-making rays, I mean so many of them as will make up 86-thousandths of the whole effect of light; for the quantity of heat and light transmitted, or stopped, in all the experiments that have been given, has been reduced to what proportion it bears to unity; and, having afterwards represented the joint effect of every ray of heat and light by 1000, each mean ray of heat must be the thousandth part of that effect; but, a mean ray of light, although it be likewise the thousandth part of the whole effect of light, will not be so of heat, because the whole effect of the latter is partly owing to rays that have been proved to be invisible. On this account, the 86 mean rays of red light, _ stopped by our bluish-white glass, cannot even amount to a stoppage of g2 rays of heat, which we have allowed. © As I have made the concession on one hand, I must explain an advantage that may be claimed on the other; which is, that mean rays and promiscuous ones have already, in a former Paper, been proved to differ considerably, and that it remains therefore unknown how many red-making rays we may sup-— pose to be stopped, in order to make up 86 mean rays of light, In answer to this, however, I must observe, that the number of promiscuous rays of light and of heat must always be inversely as their power of occasioning those sensations; so that if, for 514 Dr. Herscuer’s Experiments on the solar, and instance, a red ray is supposed to be twice as heating as a green one, there will only go half the number of them to make up a certain effect of heat; and, on the other hand, if a green ray ' should have a double power of illuminating, there will be no more than half the number of them necessary to occasion a certain effect of light. But, by my former experiments,* a red ray, though much inferior to a green one, is probably fully equal in illumination to a mean ray of all the colours united together. Now, as red rays have also been proved to be accompanied by the greatest heat, and as our bluish-white glass stops hardly any invisible heat rays, we have certainly gone the full length of fair concessions, by allowing all the light stopped by this glass to be of that sort; and thus it seems to be evident, that the heat which lies under the colours, if I may use this expres- sion, may be stopped, without stopping the colours themselves. It will not be necessary to lay much stress on this single © experiment; our second table affords us sufficient ground on which to rest more forcible arguments. A dark-red glass, for instance, was found to stop 6o6 rays of heat, and ggg,8 of light. This, even at the very first view, seems to amount to a total separation of the two principles; but let us discuss the phzeno- menon with precision. . As only one ray in 5000 can make its way through this glass, it is evident, that if the rays of light be also those of heat, there can hardly come any heat through it but what must be occasioned by rays that are invisible, It will therefore become a question to be examined, how many of this sort we can ad- mit, if we proceed on a supposition that heat consists of light, as far as that will go. Now this, we find, has already been * See page 270, 1oth experiment. , —- = = on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 515 ascertained, in a great measure, by our 1gth, 17th, and 18th experiments. In the 13th, one hundred and twenty degrees of heat were given to a thermometer, in one minute, by the rays which accompany the coloured part of the spectrum. In the 17th experiment, on the contrary, we find only 45 degrees of heat communicated to the same thermometer, in the same time, by the invisible rays of the same spectrum. If we would be more scrupulous, the 18th experiment limits the heat from rays totally invisible even to 21 degrees; but, in order to make every possible allowance, let the proportion be the most favour- able one of 120 to 45, which, reduced to mean rays of heat, will give 727 of them visible, and 279 invisible, to make up our thousand. To return to the experiment: if the total number of rays of heat ascribed to light should accordingly be rated at 727, it is evident, from the stoppage of light of this glass, that 726 rays of heat at least must also be intercepted; and, in consequence of the 153d experiment, which shews that our glass opposes no obstruction to any of the invisible rays, we shall require no more. But, by our present experiment, this glass stops only 606 rays of heat; so that 120 of them will remain unaccounted for. Now, the moment we give up the hypothesis that heat is occa- sioned by the rays of light, the difficulty becomes fully resolved by our iooth experiment, which shews that full three-tenths of the rays that have the refrangibility of the red are actually transmitted. In order, however, to make a second attempt to overcome this difficulty, without giving up the hypothesis, it may be supposed, “ that perhaps the lens which has been used in the 1th, 17th, and “18th experiments might stop a greater number of invisible 516 Dr. Herscue.’s Experiments on the solar; and “ than visible rays, and that its report therefore ought not'tobe « depended upon.”” Now, although it does not appear from the 148th experiment that such a supposition can have much foun- dation, yet, since those experiments were not made with a view to ascertain the proportion of heat contained in each part of the prismatic spectrum, we cannot lay so much stress upon them as the accuracy which is required in this case renders necessary. Let it therefore, contrary to our 100th experiment, be admitted, in order to explain the phenomenon of the red glass, which stops so much light and so little heat, that all the heat which it intercepts consists entirely of the rays which are visible, and that every one of the invisible rays of heat is transmitted: Then will 999,8 intercepted rays of light be equal to Go6 rays of heat; and the remaining 394, will be the number of rays we are now to place to the account of the invisible heat which is transmitted. Having thus also got rid of this difficulty, we are next to examine how other facts, collected in the same table, will agree with our new concession. A violet-coloured glass, for instance, stops 955 rays of light; these, at the rate of 999,8, or say 1000, to 606, must occasion a deficiency of 579 rays of heat. But, by our table, this glass stops only 489 of them; and there will thus be go rays of heat left unaccounted for. To enhance the difficulty, this glass, by our 164th experiment, stops also + of the supposed 394, invisible rays, which will amount to an additional sum of 98. And our 111th experiment shews, that actually a great number of these rays, that otherwise cannot be accounted for, come from the store of heat, the cals of which are of the refrangibility of red light. A dark-blue glass stops 801 rays of light ; sda if light and! on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 517 heat were occasioned by the same rays, would produce a stop- page of 485 rays of heat; but we find that our glass stops no more than 362, so that 123 rays cannot be accounted for by this hypothesis. To this we should add 66 invisible rays, (that is, 394, x ,167,) which, according to our 160th experiment, this glass also intercepts. But the 107th experiment, if we reject the hypothesis, immediately explains the difficulty; for-here we plainly see, that only 71 rays of heat of the refrangibility of red light are stopped, whatever may be the stoppage of that light itself. . _ A yellow glass stops 819 rays of light: these will occasion a stoppage of 496 rays of heat; but this glass intercepts only 333, and therefore 163 rays of heat must also remain unac- counted for. And, turning to the 155th experiment, we find that 79 rays, or + of the 394 allowed to be invisible ones, are also to be added to that number. If in the results of our second table we have had an excess of heat, which the last hypothesis would not account for, we shall, on the contrary, meet with a considerable deficiency, when we come to consider those of the third table. For instance, our tube filled with well-water, including the glasses at the end, intercepted 211 rays of light. These, at the rate of 606 to the thousand, would produce only a stoppage of 128 rays of heat; but here we find no less than 558 of them intercepted. To evade the pressure of these consequences, it may be said, ‘ that as before every invisible ray was supposed to ** have been transmitted through glasses, so they may now be all “intercepted by liquids.” And, granting this also to be possible, though by no means probable, for the great extent of these researches has not allowed sufficient time for many experiments MDCCC, 3X 518 Dr. HERSCHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and to be made that have been planned for execution; yet, even then, 128 visible and 394, invisible rays to be intercepted, will only make up 5223 so that a deficiency of 36 must still remain. In sea-water, the balance will stand thus: 288 rays of light give 175 rays of heat; these and ggq invisible rays make up - 569; but the rays actually intercepted were ote, which argues a deficiency of no less than 11g rays. — But if I have for a moment admitted the entire stoppage of the invisible rays of heat in liquids, the same indulgence can- not be granted for the empty tube, as we know it does neither take place in glasses, nor in air. Therefore we must calculate thus: this compound of glass and air stops 204, rays of light; these can amount only to 124 rays of heat; but it is found to stop 542 of them, so that 418 remain to be accounted for. Now, we certainly can not suppose more than 100 of them to owe their deficiency to the store of invisible heat; so that 318 will still remain unaccounted for. And thus, from the second table, we liad given instances where the assumed hypothesis of visible and invisible heat, in certain proportions, would require a greater stoppage than our experiments will admit; ana now, on the contrary, it appears, that interceptions calculated according to the same hypothesis, should be less than the results in the third table give them. From which we conclude, that every other proportion fixed upon, would always be erroneous, either in excess or in defect. Equal contradictions may be shewn to attend all endeavours to account for the results contained in our fourth table, by ad- » mitting any visible heat at all, let the quantity be what it will. To make the proof of this general, let 1000 be the total heat, and assume on iinF45 @oom ee¥eQon Bluish-green - - 652 - 6096 mye 4 ee Pale-blue -- = =. 4009, =) G76ee) — 548 _Dark-blue — - - = (619 pmo TOs, i). caine Indigo - = - - O70. 720 a ee Pale-indigo -- = 2 F7L | OSG a ae Purple - - - 520° = SO7gT = 730 Violet - - - - §00 - 615 - 684 Crown glass, one side rough 741° = = 793° =" Wie Coach glass, ditto - - 667 - 758 - 741 Crown glass, both sidesrough 615 - 791 - 833 Coach glass, both - - 680 - 854 - 769 ~ The two last but two, together 720 - 849 - -—. The two last together Ti 0O% oe ¢ OOe - — The four last together e B70, =, GOO lai Olive-colour, burnt in glass 792 - 849 - 636 White paper - - = 792 = * O12 reas Whitelinn - - = 690 = g10 = 457 White persian - = 593 - 829 = ee Black muslin - - = 565 - GOO = oom on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 525 Let us now examine what information we may draw from the facts which are recorded in this table. The first that must occur is, that a candle which emits light, is also a copious source of invisible heat. If this should seem to require a proof, I give it as follows. That the candle emits heat along with light, the thermometer has ascertained; and, that a considerable share of this at least must be invisible, follows from comparing together the quantity of light and heat which are stopped by different glasses. The bluish-white one, for instance, stops 86 rays of light, and 625 of heat. Hence, if only visible rays of heat came from the candle, a glass stopping more light, as for instance the dark-red glass, which stops 999,8, ought to stop all heat whatsoever; but the fact is, that it even stops one hundred rays less than the former. This instance alone shews plainly, that the existence of invi- sible terrestrial heat in the flame of a candle, is proved; while, on the contrary, heat derived from rays that are visible, remains yet to be established, by those who would maintain that there are any such. But, for the sake of argument, let us endeavour to explain how visible rays of heat may be reconciled with the contents of our 6th table. “ Now although we must allow,” it may be said, “ that there “ is a certain quantity of candle-heat which cannot be seen, we « are however at liberty to assign any ratio that this may bear to « its visible heat-rays. Let us therefore begin with the bluish- « white glass, and make the most favourable supposition we can, “ in order to explain its pheenomena. Visible or invisible, it stops * 625 rays of heat, and also 86 of light. Now, as in the last * column of the table we have likewise the proportional quantity “ of invisible heat it intercepts, which is 700 out of a thousand, MDCCC. ore, 526 Dr. Herscuen’s Experiments on the solar, and “we may surmise that the 914 rays of light, together with the *¢ 300 of the invisible rays which are transmitted, make up the 375 “ rays of heat which pass through the glass. Hence, by algebra, ‘* we have the number of invisible heat-rays 878, and the number *¢ of the visible ones 122. Then, to try how this will answer, if * 1000 rays of light give 122 of heat, 86 will give 10; and, if « out of a thousand invisible rays 700 be stopped, 878 will give ‘* 615 to be intercepted. The sum of these will be 625, which is «‘ exactly the number pointed out by our table.” Now this being a fair solution of one instance, let us see how it will agree with some others. Before I proceed, however, I cannot help conga that the supporters of visible heat-rays must feel themselves already considerably confined, as our present argument will ei allow ‘them more than 122 of such rays out of a thousand. Now, if the assumption that terrestrial heat is owing to a mixture of visible and invisible rays, in the proportion of i22 of the former to 878 of the latter, be well founded, it ought to explain every other phenomenon collected in our table. The purple-coloured glass stops 993 rays of light, which, according to our present hypothesis, should stop 121 rays of heat: it also stops 7g0 invisible rays, which will give’641 rays of intercepted heat ; therefore this glass should stop 762 rays of heat, out of every thousand that come from a candle; but, from our table, we find that it stops no more than 520, so that “ade | rays cannot be accounted for. ip Qi The glass with an olive colour burnt into it, stops 984 rays of light, or 120 of heat, and 6937 invisible rays, or 559 of heat. The sum is 679 which that glass should stop; but it stops ac- tually 792; so that, as in the foregoing instance we had’a defi- n ’ on the terresirial Rays that occasion Heat. 527 ciency of 242 rays, we now have an excess of 113; which plainly shews, that no hypothesis of any other proportion between the visible and invisible rays of heat can answer to both cases; and that consequently, not only the present, but every other assump- tion of this kind, must be given up as erroneous. I shall not enlarge on these arguments, as I take them to be sufficiently clear to decide the question we have had under con- sideration. I also forbear going into an examination of what our sixth article, which treats of scattered heat, might afford, in ad- dition to the former arguments. It may just be remarked, that _the 211th experiment points out a black object, which scatters more heat than a white one; while the case, as to light, is well known to be the reverse. The 219th experiment also shews, that the scattering of heat of gold paper is considerably inferior to that of black velvet; whereas a contrary difference, of a very great extent, is pointed out between these two substances; for black velvet scatters only 7 rays of light, while the scattering of gold paper amounts to more than 124000. Iam well aware that this difference will perhaps admit of a solution on other principles than those which relate merely to the laws of scat- tering, and confess that many experiments are still wanting to complete this article, which cannot now be given; but, as this Paper is already of an unusual length, I ought rather to apolo- gize for having given so much, than for not giving more. 3 Y to 528 Dr. HERSCHEL’s Experiments on the solar, and , Table of the transmission of terrestrial scattered Light through various Substances ; with a short Account of the Method by which the Results contained in this Table have been obtained. The transmissions here delivered are called terrestrial and scattered, to distinguish them from others, which are direct and solar; and, in the use I have made of them in the foregoing Paper, it has been supposed that light-making rays, whether direct and solar, or scattered and terrestrial, are transmitted in the same manner; or that the difference, if there be any, may not be considerable enough to affect my arguments materially. In this I have only followed the example of an eminent optical writer, who does not so much as hint at a possibility that there may be a difference. Before I describe my apparatus, I ought to mention that it is intirely founded on the principles of the author now alluded to,* and that no other difficulty occurs in the execution of his plan, than how to guard properly against the scatterings of the lamp: for the light which this will throw on every object, must not be permitted to come to the vanes; since these scatterings cannot remain equal on both vanes, when one of them is moveable. In the following construction, the greatest ditficulties have been removed; and a desirable consist- ency in the results of the experiments, when often repeated, has now been obtained. A board about fourteen feet long, and six inches broad,+- has two slips of deal, an inch square, fastened upon the two sides : these make a groove, for two short pieces to slide in, backwards and forwards. The two sliding pieces{ carry each a small * See Traité d’Optique, page 16, Fig. 5 ; Ouvrage posthume de M. BouGcugr. t See Plate XXVI. Fig. 1. t See Fig. 2 and 3. on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 529 board or vane; one towards the right, the other towards the left; but so as to meet in the middle, and apparently to make . but one when placed side by side. The vanes are covered with a piece of fair white paper, which is to reflect, or rather to scatter light in every direction. To one end of the board is fixed a circular piece of wood, with an opening in it, which is afterwards to be shut up by a small moveable piece,* intended for placing the transmitting objects upon. This moveable piece contains two holes, at the.distance of 14 inch from centre to centre, and 2 inch in diameter each. Against the circular wooden screen, and close over the opening in it, is placed a lantern containing a lamp. Its construction is such as to admit a current of air to feed the flame from below, by means of a false bottom, and to let it out by a covered roof; and the whole of the light, by the usual contrivance of dark lanterns, is thus kept within, so as to leave the room in perfect darkness. In the front, that is ‘towards the vanes, the lantern has a sliding door of tin-plate, in which there is a parallelogrammic hole, covered with a spout five inches long, of the same shape. Two or three such doors, with different spouts and openings, will be required to be put in, according to the experiments to be made; but the first will do for most of them. A narrow arm is fastened to the long board, which advances about three feet beyond the screen, and carries a circular piece of pasteboard, that has an adjustable hole in the centre, through which the observer is to look when the experiments are to be _ made. At the farther end of the long board is a pulley, over which a string, fastened to the back of the slider that carries one of the vanes, is made to pass. This string returns under the * See Plate XXVI, Fig. 4, $ See Fig. 5. 530 Dr. HerscueE’s Experiments on the solar, and bottom of the long board, towards the other end, where, close to the observer, another pulley is fixed; and, after going also over this pulley, it returns at the top of the board, to the front of the same vane, to which the other end of it is fastened at the back. ‘By pulling the string either way, the observer may bring tire the moveable vane, or draw it back, at pleasure. | At the side of the long board is a scale of tens of inches, num- bered from the place of the flame of the lamp, 0, 10, 20} 30, 40, and so on to i6o. A pair of compasses being applied from the last ten towards the vane, ascertains its distance from the flame, to as great an accuracy as may be required» : | When the transmitting power of a glass is to be tried, it must be placed over one of the holes of the small moveable piece, which then is fastened with a button, upon the opening left for it in the circular wooden screen. Then, looking through the hole of the pasteboard at the two vanes, and bringing that which is seen through the glass near enough to give an image equally bright with that which is seen through the open hole, the obser= vation will be completed. Having measured the odd inches by a pair of compasses, or immediately by a scale, we deduce, as usual, the transmitting power, by taking double the logarithm of the distance of the farthest vane from the lamp, from double the logarithm of the distance of the nearest vane. The remain- ing logarithm is that of the transmitting power, as compared to the light coming directly to the eye from the other vane. I have now only to remark, that the use of this instrument requires some practice, especially when coloured glasses are to be examined ; it will, however, be found, that the difference of the colour of the two objects, when their light is brought to an equality, may be overcome by a little abstraction, which is the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. — 531 required for the purpose; for, by attending only to brightness, it has often happened to me, that both objects appeared at last of the same colour; which proved to be some mean between the two appearances considered separately. Some glasses stop so much light, that it will be advisable to take them by the assistance of an intermediate one. Thus, in- stead of comparing the open vane directly to a red glass, I settle first the ratio of the violet one to that vane; then, taking the ratio of the red to the violet, and compounding these two ratios, the result will be more accurate. The reason for this will be easily comprehended, when the construction of the appa- ratus is considered. For a red glass, immediately compared to the open vane, would require its object to be brought extremely near the lamp, while the other must remain at a very great distance. This would occasion a considerable difference in the angles, both of incidence and of reflection, between the rays falling on one vane, and on the other. But, by dividing the observation into two operations, we avoid the errors that might be occasioned by the former arrangement. In the following table, the first column contains the names of the different substances through which light has been trans- mitted. The second column shews the transmission of light, expressed in decimal fractions ; or the proportion which it bears to the whole incident light considered as unity. An arithme- tical complement to this fraction, or what it wants to unity, will therefore give us the proportion of light which is stopped by each of the substances contained in the first column; and that quantity multiplied by 1000 is placed in the third column. 532 Dr. Herscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and Tasxe VII. Substances without colour. Transmission. Stoppage.. Bluish-white glass - - 1914 - 86» Flint glass - e. re ,966 i 34 Crown glass = = sate ZOE - 203 Coach glass - - - 3832 - 168 Iceland crystal - - - ,850 - 150 Talc ~ - ~ - 910.- = go Easily calcinable talc - ~ 4 s7ae - , 288 _ Glasses of the prismatic colours. Very dark red glass - - 30001335 - 999;9 Dark-red glass - - - ,000188 - 999,38 Orange glass - - - 3221 - 779 Yellow glass - - - ,081 - 319 Pale-green glass - - = ,465 - 535 Dark-green glass - - 0511 - 949 Bluish-green glass - - - 4231 - 769 Pale-blue glass - - - ,g16 - 684, Dark-blue glass gibt - 5199 - . 801 Indigo glass - - - ,000281 - 999,7 Pale-indigo glass = ~ 0218 = 978 Purple glass - - 5 ,00675 - 993 Violet glass = - = 04,52 - 955 Liquids. Empty tube and two glasses - 796 - 204 Well-water and ditto - - 5789 - 211 Sea-water - = - riz = 288 on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat, 533 Liquids. Transmission. Stoppage. Spirit of wine and two glasses ~ 1776 - 22h Gin - +. T a 374 at 626 Brandy — - - - 00381 - 996 Scattering Transmissions. eel glass, one side rubbed onemery ,146 - 854 Coach glass, ditto - = bag - 885 Crown glass, both sides rubbed on emery ,0685 - 932 Coach glass, ditto - = 0542 - 946 The two first, together - 03158 - 969° The two next, together —- = 0208 979 The four first, together ay!) SOOREO | 995 Olive colour, burnt in glass - - ,0160 - 984, Calcined talc - - ~ 3003845 = 997 White paper a - ,00556 - 994 ~ _Limen _ = - - 30483 ~ 952 ~ White Persian — - - 0841 ~ g16 Bock musing, 2 -. < yom 3263 —~Ci«*si‘ 73/7 Table of the proportional terrestrial Light scattered by various | Substances. The same apparatus which has been used to gain the results of the preceding table, has also been employed for the follow- ing one, with no other difference than that while the vane with the white paper remained on one side, the other vane was suc+ cessively covered by the objects whose power of scattering light was to be ascertained, and both vanes were viewed directly through the two open holes in the screen; the eye being sta- tioned in the same place as before. MDCCC, 32 5394 Dr. Henscurr’s Experiments on the solar; and It will be found, that this table contains the scattering 0 of more objects than: have been referred to in the preceding paper ; but, as I made these experiments in a certain order, I thought it would be acceptable to give the table at full length. basa The first column gives the names of the objects; and the second contains the number of rays of light scattered by them, when compared to a standard of white paper, which is rk ee to scatter one thousand. Tas_eE VIII. | oso White paper scatters - - 1000 rays of light. Message card - a By 160g00.0W) ait White linen - Si ke Logepgetit 200l.aiek White cotton 2 ze re 1654, iO White chamois leather, smooth side - 12928 - =~ White worsted = = = 620 12164 Sah White Persian, suspended = - ~ 6m .- SoBee - White Persian, on whitish-brown paper, - 719 - - White Persian, on white Persian - § 19 /\ieuit sae | L White muslin = ns = $27. lee -— Red papers > = = = ee Deep pink-coloured papers - - 513. Cir < Pale pink-coloured-paper - = 1 SES Ale. Sim Orange paper - Ls = -Gig - - Yellow paper ee ce a) LOR EL SN Pale-green paper — - = - 549 - “i Dark-green paper’ = 6 810900 90) godas aame Pale-blue paper = =| he “ GOH EROS Ot. ae Dark-blue paper ~ J OC OO Indigo paper, with a strong gloss - Tig See T Bee on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 535 Dark-violet paper scatters =—S = = 45 rays of light. Brown paper = ~ 101 - ~ Black paper, with a strong gloss - 420 = - Black satin - - - 102 = - Black muslin, suspended - - 64° - - Black muslin, upon black muslin =" 18 = - Black worsted © - 3 - tor wet Byolorione Black velvet - - - 7 = - Tin-fol = - = - - 8483 - = Tron = - - 10014 = - Copper = - - 13128 = - - Brass ~ - - - 43858 -— - Gold-leaf paper - =) 124371 - = I cannot help remarking, that in making these last experi- -ments, I found that:black paper could not be distinguished from white; and that, on bringing it a little nearer to the light than it should be to make them perfectly equal, any of my friends who happened to be present, would mistake the black for the white. ' EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. Plate XX, represents the spectrum of heat A, 8, Q, A; and of light G, R, Q, G. If a prism be placed in a window, so as to throw the colours of light upon a table, and Plate XX be laid under the colours, so that they may respectively fall upon the places where their names are inserted, then may these co- lours be made to fit into their proper spaces, by lowering or raising the prism, at pleasure. When the colours occupy their proper situations, the line A Q will express the space over Cw Ae) 536 Dr. Herscue.’s Experiments on the solar, and which the prism, by-their different refrangibility, scatters the rays of heat; and the ordinates to A Q will nearly express the proportional elevations, which a set of equi-changeable thermo- meters would experience, when placed in the different situa- tions of these ordinates. Plate XXI. Fig. 1. A, B, is the box which holds the two thermometers, No. 1 and No. 5. C is the board which contains the transmitting holes, the slip of wood for supporting the glasses, and the perpendicular pin for adjusting the angle. D, E, are the boards joined together by hinges. F is a slip of mahogany screwed to E. G is the spring to confine the slip F ; which will keep the board D up to any angle less than go degrees. Fig. 2, is the cover for shutting the transmitting sleet Plate XXII. Fig. 1, is the screen, which may be elevated, by the usual contrivance of springs at the back, to any required height, so as to permit the rays of the sun to pass through the opening in the middle, and to fall upon the perigee: holes of the box A, B, in Plate XXI. ; Fig. 2, is a second upper part of the box A, B, in Plate XXL. The first upper part being screwed off, this is to be put on in- stead of it, when experiments with liquids are to be made. It contains, as before, the two transmitting holes, the slip of wood, and the pin; and it has moreover a small bracket fastened un- der one of the holes, on which the tube containing the liquid to be tried may be laid. Fig. 3, is a third upper part to the box A, B, of Plate XXI. It contains two small holes, for transmitting prismatic rays to the two thermometers A and B, which must now be put into the ox, instead of No. 1 and No. 5. The parallel lines a, b, inclos- on the terrestrial Rays that occasion Heat. 537 ing the holes, will direct any coloured rays to the thermometers ; and, by drawing the red rays down to the lower parallels c or d, invisible rays may be brought to enter the transmitting holes. Fig. 4, isa fourth upper part to the box A,B, Plate XXI. It contains two large holes, for admitting the rays of the sun to fall upon the objects on Fig. 5. Fig. 5, represents two tablets, a,b, united; they may be covered with any objects that are to be examined; for instance, a with white paper, and b with black velvet. These tablets, by a pro- per contrivance, are brought under the holes of figure 4, where a button fastens them at the required distance. Plate XXIII. Fig. 1. A, B, is the box which holds the thermo- meters. C, D, are the screens, with the transmitting holes in them, opposite the flame of EF, the candle. F, is a small weight, stretch- ing a string across the glass, or other object, placed upright against the transmitting hole of the screen D. It may be carried round the screen C, if required, and hold a glass against the hole in it. Fig. 2, is the double cover: in plane it on, it must be passed ever the candle downwards, against the two transmitting holes. Plate XXIV, represents a large screen, with the shelf A, B, carrying four thermometers, No. 1 and No. § opposite the transmitting holes, and the other two as represented. When the fire is properly prepared, lift the screen, by taking hold a little above A and B, and set it close to the fire, so that C, D, may touch the bottom of the grate; then take hold of the ring E, and pull the string far enough out to hang that ring on the hook F: this will open the transmission holes, when the expe- riment is to begin. Plate XXV. Fig. 1, is the box containing the thensaameters. 538: Dr. Hersongn’s Experiments on the solar, and The bricks are piled up, as represented in Fig. 3. The stove, Fig. 2, being prepared, bring the stand, and brick-work, Fig. 3, close to it; and-set also the two spare bricks, which lie on the stand, upon the front of the stove, that no heat may pass from the top of it to the brick inclosuré ; then put the box, Fig. 1, into the brick-work, close up to the stove, and begin the expe- riment. The ash-hole should also be covered with a brick. Plate XXVI. Fig. 1, represents the Photometer. The hole at A, is for the observer to look through, that he may have a fixed station. The vanes F and G are moveable. By pulling the string at H, G will be brought nearer the lamp placed at K; and, by drawing the same string at I, it will be removed towards the vane F; which latter may be fixed at any distance most convenient for the experiment. — Fig. 2 and 3, shew the mechanism of the adjustable vane 2, and moveable one 3. There are, however, hooks on fig. 2, which will occasionally receive the strings from the hooks on fig. 3, when a motion of the left vane, instead of the right, is required. Fig. 4, contains two limiting holes B,C; over one of which, C, a glass may be laid. This piece is to be buttoned on the rab- bet of the screen, at D E, fig. 1. When liquids are to be tried, the second piece of fig. 4, which contains a bracket for support- ing the transmitting tube, is to be fastened on D E, fig. 1, instead of the former plate. Fig. 5, gives a view of the lamp and its sliding door, with the spout L, which, when the lamp is placed at K, fig. 1, conveys the light to the vanes F and G, without permitting it to be scattered on the long board. : ; . Vale XX pp G6. Shilos, Trans, MDC CC. 7, ‘ \ O edi y ey MI AN A Basireze. Shites. trans MDC CC LlaleXX p38 01 zi Yellow Basirefe. Lhilow. Trans MDC C C./71ale XX. j). S58. . ~ =p D assay FB BE- rm D OS 7 = 4 ii ee Se | | i] ——————_ | 7 a x 7 | ! Basire jc . Philos Trans MDCCCLUCXXL p, 38. Basire fe Shitos Hans MVCCC. Stale SSN p. TGS. | i? Basire Jc Shiles Tate MICCC Hale XXW p38. Ag. te ———— =a . = AK Nall ve) : 5 mr | : | — ee Philos. Trans VC CC, tale XV. p 528. Ss a4) = i = Basire Je. Philos. Trans MVC CC Hat XXNW. p53 . | Basire fe. Philos, Itans MDC CC.Late X¥N, p FBS. sy Bas ms. MD CCC. Plate XXV. p53. v. Tran Bus i Lhiles. Trars. MDC CC. HateXXV1p. 538 te 2 Sy YR es : , cE 539 J XX. An Account of the Trigonometrical Survey, carried on tn the | Years 1797, 1798, and 1799, by Order of Marquis Cornwallis, Master-General of the Ordnance. By Captain William Mudge, of the Royal Artillery, F.R.S. Communicated by bis Grace * the Duke of Richmond, F. R. S. Read July 3, 1800. INTRODUCTION. Havine interspersed in the following Paper, with as much attention to brevity as the subject admits, every intelligence relating to the Trigonometrical Survey, I think it unnecessary to swell the bulk of the communication, by giving a long pre- fatory account of its progress since the year 1796. The contents of the work now meeting the public eye, are important and numerous: I have divided it into sections. The first contains the calculations of the sides of the principal and secondary triangles extended over the country in 1797, 1798, and 1799; together with an account of the measurement of a new base line on Sedgemoor, and a short historical narrative of each year’s operation. The second section contains the computed latitudes and longitudes of those places, on the western coast, intersected in 1795 and 1796, and also such others, since de- termined, as lie conveniently situated to the newly-observed meridians. This section also contains the directions of those meridians ; one on Black Down, in Dorsetshire; another on But- terton Hill, in Devonshire; and another on St. Agnes Beacon, 540 The Account of a in Cornwall. Among the contents are likewise to be numbered the bearings, distances, &c. of the stations and intersected objects, from the parallels and meridians. , The third and last section contains the triangles which have been carried over Essex, the western part of Kent, and portions of the counties joining the former, Suffolk and Hertfordshire. It is with satisfaction I am enabled to state, that Mr. GARDNER, the chief Draftsman, with his assistants, has almost completed the Survey of this extensive tract, which, no doubt, like the map of Kent, will be given to the public: the materials for these different surveys are ample, and will be found in this section, which concludes with the altitudes of the stations and mean refractions. Before I had advanced far in my work, I entertained ideas of condensing all the data in my possession, and distributing them in it; but, when I found my paper would, in that case, be too large for the Philosophical Transactions, I desisted, contenting myself with presenting little more than a moiety: it is,even now, of inconvenient magnitude, but I could not, with propriety, still farther abridge it, for I have, in several instances, rejected im- | portant matter. I shall, therefore, take an early opportunity of compiling a fourth account, in which will be given the latitudes and longitudes of those places, in Essex, Kent, &c. found in the last section. It is right I should observe that, knowing from experience, how liable surveyors are to mistake the names of places, and also, how utterly impracticable it is to detect errors, till the interiors of the great triangles have been filled up, I have been cautious to give only the distances of such objects as could not be easily anistaken, Ido not mean to insinuate that, among Trigonometrical Survey. 54a the great number now published, instances may not be found of misnomers, or even wrong bearings; but I rely with great confidence on their general accuracy, and particularly on those constituting the surveys of Essex and the northern shore of the Thames, as the whole of them have been verified by Mr.GARDNER. Indeed this is to be understood as holding good throughout the last section, in which are 375 triangles. In our former accounts of thissurvey; we were particularly guarded in not intermixing their contents with distances determined from numerous doubtful intersections; and experience has hitherto not detected above three or four errors arising from wrong bearings or misnomers. Previously, indeed, to the compilation of them, a great part of the objects in Sussex, Hampshire, and the Isle of Wight, were verified by Mr. GARDNER, in process of an extensive survey, car- ried on by the order, and performed for the service, of the Board of Ordnance. This gentleman’will also have it in his power to detect any errors, if such exist, in the names of places to the westward; as the Master General has been pleased to issue his directions for the survey of Devonshire, and as much of Somer- setshire and Cornwall as will square the work. I have mentioned, in the body of the account, that the Presi- dent and Council of the Royal Society, were pleased to accede to the request made by the Honorable Board of Ordnance, to en- trust to my care, the circular instrument used by the late Major General Roy, in his well known operation. It has already been found highly useful, and will shortly prove to be still more so, as one theodolite will be employed in carrying the above orders of Marquis CornwALLis into effect, while the other is used in carrying a meridional line through the country ; an under- taking begun, and partly executed. MDCCC. 4, A 542 The Account of a Before I close this Introduction, I am to announce, that Mr. Isaac Datsy, no longer able to endure the fatigues incident to the service, has retired from it; and it would be a matter of injustice, if I were not toacknowledge the extent of his services, his unremitted labour, and attention. But, whilst I lament the loss of a man so perfectly calculated to assist me in this arduous undertaking, I derive every consolation from a knowledge, found- ed on experience, of the talents and abilities of Mr. Simon Woot- cot, his successor. SECTION FIRST. 1. Particulars relating to the Operations of the Year 1797. The principal object proposed to be accomplished this year, was the determination of the directions of meridians at proper stations, in order to afford the necessary data for computing the latitudes and longitudes of places intersected in the surveys of 1795 and 11796. From errors which are the result of computations made on the supposition of the earth’s surface being a plane, it is expe- dient that new directions of meridians should be observed, when the operations are extended, in eastern or western directions, over. _ spaces. of sixty miles from fixed meridians. The distance from Dover to the Land’s End being upwards of 300 miles, it becomes necessary, on this principle, that four directions of meridians should be observed; which, with that of Greenwich, amounts to five, dividing this space into six nearly equal parts. Whatever be the stations farther to the westward, which offer Trigonometrical Survey. 543 themselves as fit places for these observations, Dunnose in the Isle of Wight presents itself as highly eligible, not only because it is removed the necessary distance from the meridian of Greenwich, but also because it commands a most extensive view of the western coast: therefore, as the direction of the me- ridian was observed on this station in 1793, (see Philosophical Transactions for 1795, Pp. 517.) it became necessary to fix on three places only. In the selection of these stations, it was our wish to have found such as should lie nearly in the same parallel, each inter- mediate one being visible from those east and west of it; by which means, the differences of latitude between their respective paral- lels would be accurately determined. When the party was at Dunnose, in the year 1793, a hill at a very considerable distance, in a direction very nearly west, was seen just rising out of the horizon. It then occurred to us that this spot would, at some future period, be a very proper one for a station whereon a new direction of the meridian might be ob- served. Experience, in the Survey of 1795, led us to believe this hill was actually Black Down in Dorsetshire; therefore it was determined that our operations should commence at that station, and the event verified the truth of our suppositions. The party took the field early in April, as observations on the Pole Star, for the purpose in question, are made with superior advantage at this season of the year, because the star comes to its greatest elongations from the meridian at those times, when the sun produces little tremor in the air, by which means, the staff to which the Pole Star is referred, in good weather, is easily perceived. _As the high land in the vicinity of Teignmouth, in Devonshire, 4A2 BAA : The Account of a cuts off all view of the southern extremity of ee from Black Down, the necessary alternative was, the firing of lights on some remote station, communicating with Butterton. Rippin Tor was quickly discovered to be the most proper spot ; and that eminence would, in every point of view, be a most eligible one for a new direction of the meridian, if the hills in the middle of the moor were not considerably higher. It was, therefore, chosen only. with a view of being subservient to the purpose of finding the latitude of Butterton. In making observations on the Pole Star, the same precautions | were taken to ensure accuracy, as were observed at Dunnose and Beachy Head in the year 1793; (see Phil. Trans. for 1795, p 460.) I shall, therefore, not enumerate them, but content myself with observing, that no pains were spared in this per-— formance. . From Black Down, the party removed to Butterton ; at which place but few observations were made, the weather being either tempestuous or hazy, during the greatest part of the time we were at that station: they were, however, made under favour- able circumstances, in other respects, and are syle eas likely to afford accurate results. | As in the case of Rippin Tor, with respect to Black Down, so Hensbarrow, in Cornwall, was selected as the spot for connect- ing St. Agnes Beacon with the station on Butterton; for these latter are not visible from each other, the high land ‘about St. Austle, onthe northern part of which is situated Hens or Hengist barrow, being higher and intermediate. The staff to which the lights and star were referred, was placed on a hill: called Hem- merdon Ball, a secondary station in the series of 1795. On the ist of May, the party proceeded to St. Agnes Beacon; at Trigonometrical Survey. BAS which place the observations were completed on the 8th. The staff for connecting the observations made on the Pole Star with those made on the lights fired at Hensbarrow, was placed near Peranzabulo; which spot is laid down in the plan, Pl. XXVII. After these directions of meridians were determined, we pro- ceeded with the survey, and from St. Agnes Beacon repaired to Trevose Head, a promontory on the northern coast of Cornwall. The ascent from the sea to the station on this headland being very gradual and unobstructed, we took the opportunity of find- ing its altitude by means of the transit instrument. The levelling was begun on the goth of May, and finished the following day ; from which operation, it was found that the height of the station above low water-mark was 274,92 feet; which is, probably, within six inches of the truth. This base of altitude, will afford the means of computing the heights of the stations in the north of Devon, and also of verifying those in the western part of Cornwall. (See Phil. Trans. for 1797, p. 471.) | In giving an account of this and similar articles, it is my intention merely to set forth the order in which the different parts of the survey have been performed. It would be prolix, and perhaps, unnecessary, to assign the reasons for the choice of each station. In the present instance, however, it may not be improper to observe, that a station called Black Down, near Lydford, was selected for the purpose of carrying distances into the north of Devon, by means of the side formed by that station and Carraton Hill. The difficulty of running up the series of triangles from the west, (and it might have been also added, towards the north, ) is mentioned in the account of 1797. A tract of country exists in Cornwall, possessing the same characteristic features with Dartmoor, and has thrown in our 546 The Account of a way equal embarrassments. The station called Carraton Hill, is situated on its southern extremity, from which no part of the north of Cornwall can be seen : it, therefore, became expedient to erect a staff on the top of the rugged hill Brown Willy, (a spot not accessible to the instrument, ) and afterwards to content ourselves with surveying round it. ‘This resolution became the more necessary, as by means of it, the triangles in the west of Devon will be hereafter connected with those in the north of Cornwall, in a shorter and more direct way than from the sides in the more southern country. In order, therefore, to observe the staff erected on this station, the instrument was taken a se- cond time to Bodmin Down. The station named Cadon Barrow, near Camelford, and those on St. Stephen’s Down, near Laun- ceston, were also visited ; at which time it was judged expedient to discontinue the operations in Devonshire. In proceeding along the southern coast, in the years 1795 and 1796, with a single chain of triangles, we acted in conformity with our instructions. It was, in many points of view, the most eli- gible modeof proceeding; and particularly in that which regarded an early determination of the latitudes and longitudes of the great head-lands in the channel, and also of the Scilly Isles. When the operations above spoken of were completed, and those instructions carried into full execution, (ample materials being provided for ascertaining the situations of every remarkable point on the English side of the channel,) the want of a spot in the southern part of Cornwall, for the measurement of a base, was felt and regretted; we were, therefore, unwilling to . introduce errors, if any should exist, from the sides in Cornwall, into the north of Devon: our operations were consequently discontinued. T rigonometrical Survey. 547 From Devonshire we proceeded to the eastward, for the pur- pose of carrying on a second series of triangles. These were necessarily intended to originate from the side which connects the station on Beacon Hill, near Amesbury, with that on Win- green Hill, near Shaftesbury. In the month of July, the observations were completed at the station on the Mendip Hills, after which the instrument was taken to Bradley Knoll; Dundry Beacon, near Bristol; Lans- down and Farley Down; the station on Lansdown being chosen rather for a secondary than a principal place of observation. From Bradley Knoll, to which place the instrument was carried from Farley Down, we proceeded to Westbury Down, and from thence to Beacon Hill, near Amesbury; because it was necessary that a new point on the range near Marlborough, commonly named St. Ann’s Hills, should be observed. The station formerly chosen at the eastern extremity of this range, and observed in 1794, (see Phil. Trans. 1795, p. 4’71.) was this year found to be useless, as the high land, on the same range, ‘prevented it from being seen at Lansdown : two others were, therefore, selected to the westward of the former, and observed from Beacon Hill; one for the purpose of connecting with Lans- down, and a stationnear Symmond’s Hall,in Gloucestershire; and the other with Inkpin Beacon. The particular circumstances of this range, both as to situation and height, have thrown great im- pediments in the way of the survey, and are the means of cutting off, in a considerable degree, the connection between the southern triangles and those which have been since carried on in the midland of the kingdom. From Amesbury the party proceeded to Inkpin Beacon, near Hungerford, where the operations terminated. 548 The Account of a The stations chosen and observed this year, but not visited with theinstrument, were Monymoor, near Penhow; the moun- tain Twymbawlin, near Newport; and Scilly Point, in Glamor- ganshire. These stations in South Wales will connect with three in Somersetshire, also selected this season; one on Bleak Down, which is situated on the western extremity of the Mendip range ; a second on Brent Beacon; and a third on the Quantock Hills. Subsequent to the operations on Salisbury Plain, enquiries had been often made after a spot on which a third base might be measured. Experience had almost convinced us that, if Sedge- moor were excepted, the southern part of England did not con- tain one of sufficient extent for a base of three miles. Aware, therefore, of the imperfect state in which our work must rest, without a fresh base, Mr. Datsy and myself passed over into South Wales, and examined the extensive level between the new Passage House and Cardigan. After, however, a very diligent search, we could not find any spot, four miles in length, suffici- ently unobstructed. The advantages which the situation itself holds out, are so great, that we should not have scrupled to dis- pense with a desideratum, heretofore required, of the base being one continued line. So much, however, is this flat cut up with rbynes and ditches, that we were not able to find any point from which two right lines might be measured, and so inclined to each other as to afford, by means of an including angle, a third side of five miles in length: necessity, therefore, compelled us to think of measuring a base on Sedgemoor, which we immedi- ately examined. That which relates to this situation, will be found in an ensuing article: it is now only necessary to observe, that we concluded the operations of 1797, after the practicability of measuring a base upon it had been decided in the affirmative. Trigonometrical Survey. 549 Biv ART. 11. Angles taken in the Year 1797. At Black Down. Between eto ey Mean. Dunnose and Abbotsbury staff = . - 164 26 33975 hs 552 5 LB, 37 Rippin Tor and Abbotsbury staff - | - - 3 8 51,75 } 5255 52575 J? Pilsden and Abbotsbury staff = - - - 45 16 15 14, but 13 < a LY, ; 13 preferred. Pole star and Abbotsbury staff, April 17, morning - 104 19 26,75 18, morning == 104 19 19,25 1g, morning : 104 19 33 Ig, afternoon - 98 42 47 20, morning = 104 19 25,25 20, afternoons « 98 42 35,5 a ; : At Butierton. Hemmerdon Balland Rippin Tor - ~~ - By AO: panei G ale i 8,5 } 775 Hemmerdon Ball and Hensbarrow — = a ie ¥g2" 257% : : 6,25 } 4:5 Pole star and staff on Hemmerdon Ball, May 6, afternoon = 91 29 13,75 7,morning e 97 4 14 7, afternoon - gi 29 12 - On St. Agnes Beacon. Hensbarrow and Trevose Head - - - 47 10 0,75 Hensbarrow and Peranzabulo staff - - - 31 50 55,5 156, but ) 5 . 56,25 J 55.5 pref. Pole star and Peranzabulo staff, May 20, afternoon ~ © 44 © 45,75 s 21, afternoon - 44 © 44,75 22, morning - 3826 185 22, afternoon - 44 O 33.25 23, morning ° 38 269 At Trevose Head. | St. Agnes Beacon and Hensbarrow - - 65 43 43575 47 47 * 50 MDCCC. | 4B 55O The Account of a Between avd Mabie Mean Sebi. ua eee ‘ , . rik Jas Hensbarrow and Bodmin Down . 34 17 3 }ases Bodmin D d Cadon Barro - - - 233.43 \rejec- in Down and Cadon Ww le heeos 51575 } et 52575 J At Hensbarrow. . St. Agnes Beacon and Trevose Head ie Sheen - 67 6 13,251. g n 1332 5 f 13725 Bodmin Down and Trevose Head = 1 z 77 20 17575 Vig. 19:26 ds ey At Bodmin Down. Hensbarrow and Trevose Head - - - 68 21 57,25 }s8 25 | 59:55 Trevose Head and Cadon Barrow - - - 71 55 26,75 hey 27 Carraton Hill and staff on Brown Willy aie) ~ 52 3 595 4 1:25 7,75 * 455 Carraton Hill and picket on Brown Willy - - $1.36, Ald jie \ Il Cadon Barrow and staff on Brown Willy : = & 30 58 13 hi 3 : 13 ‘ Cadon Barrow and picket on Brown Willy e - 31 26 0,25) 1525 p 1575 3225 ' On Cadon Barrow. Trevose Head and direction post on Bodmin Down =i 68 7 53.75 54 54525 54.25 4 5475 Direction post on Bodmin Down and staff on Brown Willy = 41 12 3755 39 39225 wth ‘ sit Direction post on Bodmin Down and picket on Brown Willy - 40 40 34 } : 36375 355 5 Tresparrot Down and staff on Brown Willy - - 100 20 §2,25 55 54975 ; : i" 57 Tresparrot Down and picket on Brown Willy - =.) TO "59h } ; I At St. Stepben’s Down. Staff on Brown Willy and Warbstow —- - - 41 18 24,25 it ; 255 J° Trigonometrical Survey. 55 Between Ce, r) Mean. Warbstow Beacon and Brendon Moor - A So 99. 41. 1805 M) J. etere 18,75 [18,75 cee e 19 Brendon Moor and Broadbury Down - - - 99 +0 40,75 } a ; 3 Broadbury Down and Black Down - - - 45 34 36D 84 one hazses Black Down and Carraton Hill - - - 91 18 12,25 175 - 1355 5 Carraton Hill and Kit Hill ~ | : - $37 = UE5G Black Down and Kit Hill - - - - 54 16 13 : 3 At Maker. Carraton Hill and Black Down : - - > 53 4 28 }e . , 39,5 9» 5 . At Carraton Hill. ‘ Black Down and Maker Heights = 4g = - TAG B25 if esi 22,75 [775 Trevose Head and Bodmin Down = take = 77 2017575 \ V9 19325 oa At Black Down. Maker Heights and Carraton Hill = alan ho ° 52.501, fo7s } ! , 11575 975 Carraton Hill and St. Stephen’s Down - : < 39 44 37,25 } | 3 40.75 J%9 St. Stephen’s Down and Broadbury Down - - 66 49 57.5 } 58 58,25 Carraton Hill and Kit Hill - - - e 13 12 58 On the Mendip Hills, Dundon Beacon and Bleak Down - - 85 15 59,25 5975 16 1,5 25 : . 4:5 Bleak Down and Brent Knoll - - - * 29 11 35,75 8 S ; ee 39325 41575 Bleak Down and Dundry Beacon - = 33 39 305 30,5 395 552 mY) ‘The Account of a Between } Dundry Beacon and Lansdown tsi Sub caling Lansdown and Farley Down - entin fo ne Farley Down and Westbury Down - - Westbury Down and Bradley Knoll - . | Farley Down and Dundry Beacon on - Farley Down and Bradley Knoll - - At Dundry I Beacon. Tickenham Down and Grey Hill - S Tickenham Down and Kingsweston = = ° Kingsweston and Grey Hill - ° 2 a2 ng 2g Oe : 27575 25575 Bleak Down and Grey Hill ° - - 120 0,23 - USGS wit 240 p25 28 , Lansdown and station on the Mendip Hills 2 DS N83 gg Gag ae . 19575 Farley Down and Mendip Hills - _ PLS 6p gama & Pa: sf 23. Jc. Mendip and Bleak Down - - - 54 94.24 7 2 s 5 ; tig A5RY Sudo At Lansdown. Kingsweston and Dundry - - va ANN 36 38 29 © On Farley Down. a St. Ann’s Hill and Westbury Down . - - 3) 44 10,75" i x i ) : é WP aca ode 11,75 : bE 525 ; oF x 13575 ‘ * a Westbury Down and Bradley Knoll - - 37 5 ges75 ac” ; iarewy are fy bbudlequt 2 f Rohl. aM oe 34.25 Trigonometrical Survey. ‘ Between Westbury Down and Mendip Hills Bradley Knoll and Mendip Hills Mendip Hills and Dundry Beacon On Bradley Knoll, Mendip Hills and Westbury Down Westbury Down and Beacon Hill St. Ann’s Hill and Westbury Down Westbury Down and Milk Hill Beacon Hill and Wingreen Beacon Hill and Bull Barrow Wingreen and Bull Barrow Bull Barrow and Ash Beacon Ash Beacon and Mendip Hills 101 23 553 r; Mean, 51575 } rp 23 23575 peas 15,25 \rejec- 21,5 Jted. 2575 235 56,5 5775 oO 1,75 29525 39,5 29375 44, 45925 45 46, is 53,25 }s ie 38,25 31 3395 | 34 51525 52575 i 5? 3.25 } 3.75 J 39 59 3295 by 71 34 54975 55225 J>9 Mendip Hills and Farley Down - - 63 © 21,5D At Bull Barrow. Ash Beacon and Mintern - - - 51 26 41 41575 fs 43 Bradley Knoll and Wingreen - : 42 55 32.75 At Pilsden Hill. Mintern and Ash Beacon - - - cee at | 2 3 3225 J [ ° . ; ; te ri aA 554 The Account of a At Mintern. noowaedh Between % ‘ | {pial a Lge ‘ vay ries? Pilsden and Ash Bescon - - pes # 35 on Ash Beacon and Bull Barrow - - 14,22 27 ihredhh a 23. ; ; a eh On Westbury Down. bi r of Beacon Hill and Bradley Knoll ees 9 ae 114 12 18,25 7 SUE we: 18,5 78,5 — : + a iia Bradley Knoll and Mendip Hills ~ - . “4048 4) qo 1575 ¢ 1475 Mendip Hills and Farley D 7 beg vied endip Hills and Farley Down - - - : z 50 Ip y % e R . 3 a ar |sues Farley Down and St. Ann’s Hill - - 38 50 "x" ") 4 r Hill pe St. Ann’s Hill and Beacon Hi - - - pag ee Beacon Hill and Milk Hill - - - 48 7 a8 }335 ‘ : yi ? Beacon Hill ( Amesbury.) Bradley Knoll and Westbury Down - - 23 4 15 Inkpin Down and Milk Hill - - f Wes 66 14 58 Inkpin Down and St. Ann’s Hill - - = FO 51 $755 } Yee 37:75 AS Westbury Down and Milk Hill e - SST AN Me wee Meee Westbury Down and St. Ann’s Hill - - 48 34: Ota Abed ry. 49 34 9925 Pp 7975 On Inkpin Down. © White Horse Hill and Highclere amr : 333 27 57225 } 57.5 ae id Highclere and Beacon Hill - ° ace 106 16 52,25 } | 5425 J 99775 Beacon Hill and Hewish: - -- - 51 53 nea ‘ —— 3325 733925 35 bs Wie TS ‘ » 4 moma Reape Trigonometrical Survey. | 555 ArT. 1. Particulars relating to the Operations of the Year 1798. The object first attained this year, consisted in a trigonome- trical survey of the counties adjacent to the northern and southern shores of the Thames. In the last communication it will be seen, that the survey of Kent had been carried on from the sea-coast, till it reached the range which runs eastward from Wrotham through Holling- bourn, and there terminated. The country to the northward could not be surveyed, because the view from General Roy’s station at Wrotham is almost entirely cut off, in that direction. In order, therefore, to obtain a base for the purpose, when the party arrived at Wrotham, a new station was chosen, to the eastward of the former one, and the distance between them accurately measured; by which means, together with the included angle at the old station, and the distance of it from Severndroog Tower, on Shooter’s Hill, a new distance was found, which be- came a base for the survey proposed. The chief draftsmen and surveyors belonging to the Drawing- room in the Tower, attended our operations in this county, and also those afterwards carried on in Essex. It was, indeed, for their immediate service, that we renewed the survey in this quarter, as the Master-General had given directions to prepare ample materials for completing the map which meets the public eye with this article. The stations in Kent, besides that of Wrotham, were Gravesend, Gad’s Hill, and the Isle of Sheppey; those in Essex were Hadleigh, South End, and Prittlewell. Observations made > from these places afforded data for the proposed survey: after they were completed, the small circular instrument supplied the 556 The Account of a place of the great one, and was used, with good effect, in cattys ing on the subsequent operations in this quarter. In our Paper published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1795, an observation is made, of the necessity then existing for the measurement of a base on Salisbury Plain, in consequence of resolutions taken to inclose Sedgemoor: an act for which pur- pose was passed a few years ago, and partly carried into execu- tion in 1797. At this time, however, King’s Sedgemoor was only set out into parochial allotments, as exhibited in Plate XXVIII. accompanying this Account. The ditches, represented by lines on this plan, were generally ten feet broad, and five feet deep ; but the principal and secondary drains were much wider, the first being thirty, and the last twenty-five, feet in breadth. The subdivisions on the Moor, or the individual allotments of it, were not traced out in the Somerton quarter, at this time, the task being deferred till the latter part of the following year. The measurement, therefore, of this base, in an early part of the season, became necessary, because fewer obstacles were then expected to present themselves. As it appeared that many instances would probably occur, in which a chain of 50 feet in length would be useful, if not abso- lutely necessary, one was provided by Mr. Ramspen, in the winter; its. make and form being precisely similar to those of the larger chains, used in the measurement of our former bases. Such a chain did, indeed, prove highly serviceable in the subse- quent operation; as the handles of the 100-feet chain would very often have had their places in ditches, or been so situated — on their banks, as to leave imperfect means of correctly placing the register heads under the handles. ‘The apparatus for the measurement, consisting of the sects Trigonometrical Survey. 557 belonging to the Royal Society, pickets, iron heads, and a new set of coffers, were sent to Somerton, after Mr. Garpyer had been furnished with the means of proceeding with the survey before spoken of. ) The measurement was begun in July, and finished in August; in the course of which, very little interruption arose from any inclemency of weather. It is unnecessary to enter minutely into a description of the difficulties which arose from the frequent intervention of ditches ; let it suffice to observe, that, possessed of the 50-feet chain, these were rendered less material than they would otherwise have been. When we arrived at that point which ends with the 114th chain, an offset was taken, and 41 g chains measured, in a direc- tion perfectly parallel to that of the base, at the extremity of which we returned into the base itself, and continued the mea- surement. This interruption proceeded from an accidental and unforeseen circumstance ; a great ditch having been excavated in a direction coincident with that of the base, while the mea- surement was going on at the upper end of it. This, however, cannot be the means of introducing any sensible inaccuracy ; for, to proceed in this matter correctly, when it became neces- sary to take an offset, a silver wire was let fall from the register head, having a plummet, under the point of which a small dot was made, on a stake driven firmly into the ground. The great theodolite was then placed over the stake, and the instrument accurately adjusted over the dot. A diaphragm, whose aperture was + an inch, was then put over the objéct-glass of the transit telescope, which was afterwards directed towards the staff at Lugshorn Corner, and then moved round, till it exactly made a right angle with the base. The telescope being sufficiently MDCCC, 4C 558 The Account of a depressed, a peg’ was driven into the ground, with its centre nearly under the cross wires; after which, a pin was moved on the surface of the peg, as directed by a person looking through the telescope, till it came to that point at which it bisected the angle formed by the cross wires. The measurement was then carried on, in this new direction, a space of 19 chains, at the end of which, the same operations were repeated, and the old direc- tion pursued. It does not seem probable, that an error amounting to more than 4, of an inch, can have resulted from this pro- cedure. King’s Sedgemoor being sufficiently level, the base was measured horizontally; an advantageous circumstance; but, from the soft texture of the soil, the pickets could not be driven into the ground so firmly as to be without some small degree of motion, in case a person stood close to them. ‘Therefore, those who attended the handles of the chains, either used long stools, or placed themselves so as to divide the pressurewarising from the weights of their bodies equally on each side of the pickets. The disturbances to which the register-heads were liable, did not discover themselves till a mile of the base had been mea- sured; and, although it became probable that small errors only had resulted from the want of those precautions we afterwards followed, yet we considered what we had done as erroneous, and recommenced the measurement, with the advantage of experience. At present, I shall content myself with observing, that due attention was paid to all necessary minutiz in this measurement, and refer those who are desirous of being more particularly informed, to the Philosophical Transactions for 1795, as the mode of proceeding on the present occasion was perfectly similar to that on Hounslow Heath. Trigonometrical Survey. 559 After the conclusion of this operation, we proceeded to select such stations in the neighbourhood of the base, as might afford means of connecting it with the triangles carried on in the prece- ding year, The two chosen for this purpose, were Dundon Beacon, and a spot near the village of Moor Lynch; both nearer to their respective ends of the base than we wished to have found them ; yet, as small rods of only an inch in diameter were placed on those stations, when they were observed from Dundon Beacon and Moor Lynch, and the same erected at the ends of the base, when they were observed from those stations, it becomes pro- bable that very trifling errors resulted from this proceeding. The station at Ash Beacon was visited subsequent to these just spoken of, and afterwards that on the Mendip Hills, for the purpose of taking the angle between Moor Lynch and Dundon Beacon. ‘The operations of 1798 then terminated with a dili- gent search after some spot in Cornwall, for a base of only two or three miles in length: this search, however, was fruitless, as in fact we had reason to imagine it would prove to be; but we were not willing to relinquish the hope, that a piece of ground might be discovered proper for so confined a purpose. The contrary, however, being the case, the party returned to London in October. art. iv. Angles taken in the Year 1798. At Wrotham. Station of 1787. Between me AR Mean. New Station and staff on Severndroog Tower - 94 19 30 e Station of 1798. Severndroog Tower and Gravesend - : 62. 54 36,5 38,5 738 3995 4C 2 560 The Account of a At Gravesend. Between Lilac Le ehele bat eee Mean. Severndroog Tower and Wroth - a ee 21 Phigic g rotham 39 zt ja Severndroog Tower and Langdon Hill . orl 95 53 56 " | . 5925 759 re 54; MahS io Langdon Hill and Hadleigh ~ - = 54-35 14955 1) 5255 53 54. 5795 Halstow and Hadleigh - - - 30 24 17 ; 19:75 719 20,5 Halstow and Gad’s Hill © - : 31 38 19,75 22,25 f7" Severndroog Tower and Hadleigh ° - 130 25 * ‘ 5155 }sexrs Isle of Sheppey. Gad’s Hill and Halstow ek - - 18.18 1,5 7 3 3 : 395 Halstow and Hadleigh - “ < 31 28 23 24:5 p24,25 ; = Langdon Hill and Hadleigh - - 16 26 30 Langdon Hill and Rayleigh ae - - 27 4 46 At Halstow. Gad’s Hill and Gravesend - ie ie 24 18 21,25 ; 21,25 f71975- Gravesend and Hadleigh _ - - 107 49. ae 5} 5525 Hadleigh and Sheppey - - - 99 18 ‘ } 6 Gravesend and centre of Rayleigh Tower - - III 20 1 if Sheppey and Rayleigh Tower — - - Thea 95 46 57, At Hadleigh. Sheppey and South End - - ges 38 43 29 Sheppey and Halstow = - - - 49 13 3395 Gravesend and Halstow en mie - pit 46 ge 82h Langdon Hill and Gravesend - - 43 11 5% Trigonometrical Survey. Between Gravesend and Severndroog Tower ° - ‘Langdon Hill and Sheppey - = = At South End. Sheppey and Hadleigh epg e “ es Ai Langdon Hill. - Gravesend and Severndroog - - - Centre of Rayleigh Tower and Gravesend - Station on Rayleigh Tower and centre of the same Tower Station on Rayleigh Tower and Danbury Spire - Severndroog Tower and Frierning - - Frierning Tower and Station on Rayleigh Tower - Frierning and Danbury Spire - - - Severndroog Tower and Brentwood Spire - ° 119 20 At Triptree Heath. 1st Station. Tillingham Tower and Station on Rayleigh Tower - Tillingham and Danbury Spire - - - Station on Rayleigh Tower and Langdon Hill - Station on Rayleigh Tower and Frierning Tower - At Lugshorn Corner. Greylock’s Foss and Dundon Beacon - = Greylock’s Foss and Moor Lynch - é = Moor Lynch and Dundon Beacon : . & At Greylock’s Foss. Moor Lynch and Lugshorn Corner - = - Lugshorn Corner and Dundon Beacon - = Dundon Beacon and Moor Lynch X ~ Z 100 28 eS 8 29 30 105 40 30575 31525 }s y 58,5 59. p59 59375 33275 58,25 59575 } 59 5957 ari 2 : bo 055 225 362 ~The Account of a. oxen | Near Moor Lynch Windmill. cee Between [ pe Paar is Greylock’s Foss and Dundon Beacon “ ° - 59 55.12,55 ° =" 4 Greylock’s Foss and Lugshorn Corner - - - 51 58 2,25 } 3025 425 f°? Lugshorn Corner and Dundon Beacon -- - - Hine 184s 1OnTP bod bean ® : 10,25 hie 5 Dundon Beacon and Mendip Hills - oe 54 38 50 }s0 50 Mendip Hills and Ash Beacon - - - 7 oe | ; 2355 2205 ' 23°75 J Ash Beacon and Pilsden Hill - ~ 58 4 57 Vupel a§ 0 , 3075 ¢ 395 455 Dundon Beacon and Pilsden Hill = - - 56 43 36,25 36,5 36:75 . 37225 diets a% ¢ Pilsden and Quantock Hills ~ - - 87 15 6 } ra . : 7 . 25 Quantock Hills and Brent Knoll ~ * - 71 38 57575 | 7%) 58,5 (58,25 58,5 Brent Knoll and Bleak Down - - - 46 1 32,75. ¢ tbe 35975 Bleak Down and Mendip Hills - Ee Nai = 43 41 43,5 45 - , 45525 Jose 46,75 Brent Knoll and Mendip Hills - - - 89 43 19,5 2055 Jans 24 On Dundon Beacon. | Lugshorn Corner and Moor Lynch - - =\) AL. 78) 7 rgeyeee 14,5 [ °#5 Lugshorn Corner and Greylock’s Foss - a0 oy OS Ab eee Lae ; 2955 Greylock’s Foss and Moor Lynch - - - 8 1 51,25 y ync 10 5075 sa,05 Moor Lynch and Bleak Down - = ~ i as ao . i q - ’ y 10,25 } 1o:25 ‘Or 22.54, Moor Lynch and Mendip Hills - ie eRe ed : 5275 ses " op? ‘ {inti goed x wiht ce Trigonomeirical Survey. At Ash Beacon. Between Moor Lynch and Mendip Hills - i= Mendip Hills and Bradley Knoll - . Bradley Knoll and Bull Barrow 2 “ Bull Barrow and Pilsden ~ c 2s « Mintern Hill and Pilsden = = ns ut Pilsden and Quantock Hills - - at Quantock Hills and Mendip Hills - - On the Mendip Hills. Bradley Knoll and Ash Beacon - Ps - Ash Beacon and Moor Lynch - ies « Dundon Beacon and Moor Lynch - - 563 mie ais Means 56 29 50 F 52525 7515 52525 J 50 8 45,25 t75 L455 93 38 ne i se 83 40 ae haus 3525 J 39 49 21 35575 39075 38:25 39575 J 59 34 40,5 r 42,25 Jans 72 57 49:75 58 16 20 PMS eee 24,25 69 26 46,5 48,25 evra 23 58 16,5 17575 fi! ArT. Vv. Particulars relating to the Operations of the Year 1799. I have shewn in the preceding articles, that sufficient mate- rials are now in my possession, for calculating the latitudes and longitudes of those places whose bearings and distances from given stations are found in the Account of 1797. I have also pointed out the direction which the survey has subsequently taken ; and given a short account of the measurement of a new base in Somersetshire.. The operations of 1799 now remain to be spoken of. 564, The Account of a In very early stages of the work, I had frequent opportunities » of observing, that eminent advantages would accrue to the ser- vice, were the survey prosecuted on a more extensive scale. The consideration of a grand instrument being laid up in the apartments of the Royal Society, suggested the propriety of ob- taining it; therefore, when my appointment to my present situa- tion gave me the means of effecting former ideas, I lost no time in applying to the President and Council, for the loan of their large theodolite, the excellence of which had been incontestibly demonstrated by the late Major General Roy. The distinguished services which the Royal Society have rendered this branch of the public service, leave it almost unnecessary for me to observe how readily they granted my request. The instrument was, accordingly, put into the hands of Mr. RamspEn, early in the month of January, for the purpose of being examined, and also | of having new microscopes fixed to it; the former ones being much inferior, in construction, to those attached to the instru- ment belonging to Government. To carry on so extensive a survey as that which is now the subject of this Paper, much consideration is necessary. I have endeavoured to give it the best effect, both as to design, and celerity of execution. What degree of success has attended my endeavours, the public, in possession of this Paper, can readily determine. In the present stage of the survey, I have been. sufficiently impressed with just ideas, as to the importance of the task, and responsibility of my situation. The difficulties which start up, in prosecuting a survey of this kind, become more numerous as it becomes more extensive. In the earliest part of it, when few objects only were in view, speedy execution followed the design; but, circumstances now require every Trigonometrical Survey. 565 exertion, as the triangles are branched out into several parts of the kingdom. - Were the length of a degree of the meridian, in these latitudes, accurately known, the most eligible method of carrying on the survey would be, that of working between any two determined parallels of latitude, till the space between them was completed. Yet this mode would manifestly be subject to some slight inno- vations, from the necessity of measuring bases in certain stages of the work : it would beright, however, to adopt the principle for general practice. Under this idea, it would have been proper to have commenced the operations of this year in Somersetshire, and to have carried on the triangles from the neighbourhood of the new base into the north of Devon. It is mentioned in one of the former Accounts, that a zenith sector was formerly bespoken of Mr. RamspeEn, by his Grace the Duke of Ricumonp, for the purpose of aiding the design of measuring the length of a degree of latitude in this country. The pressure of other business caused Mr. RamspEn to lay aside this instrument, after he had considerably advanced in its construction. The real necessity, however, for our being sup- plied with an instrument of this description being made known to him, he resolved to take it in hand again, and complete it. Relying on the strength of his assurances to this effect, I deter- mined to relinquish the intention of proceeding to the westward ; and resolved to commence this year’s operations, with running up a series of triangles along the meridian of Blenheim. As it is’ probable my next communication will contain the result of this interesting part of the survey, I shall now confine myself to such particulars as relate to the subject under consideration. - Ina former article, I have observed, that the chief Draftsman, MDCCc. 4, D 566 The Account of a Mr. Garpner, has been furnished with materials for surveying the northern shore of the Thames, and the north of Kent: these proved ample, as the map, thence compiled, will sufficiently de- monstrate. As the Master-General issued directions, at this time, to survey Essex, and parts of the adjoining counties, in the same manner, and for the same purpose, as Kent has been, I was obliged to suspend, for a short time, my intention of proceeding with the measurement of a meridional degree, and to devise the best means for carrying his Lordship’s instructions into execution. For this purpose, therefore, before any stations were chosen in Essex, the county was very minutely examined; when it ap- peared, that insuperable difficulties would occur, if the survey were prosecuted with the large theodolite only. The range commencing at Havering Bower, and running to Gallywide Common, cuts off a regular communication between the stations subsequently chosen in the southern and northern parts of Essex. The difficulty resulting from this circumstance, was made still greater, from the want of success in our endeavours to find one spot on this range, proper for a station. The eastern part was, in some degree, found more favourable ; but it was dis- covered that, even here, the small instrument must frequently be used as a substitute for the large one. Under these disadvan- tages, the survey commenced in March; the large theodolite being taken to a station on Hampstead Heath. The base chosen for carrying on the distances towards the north, was that constituted by Severndroog Tower on Shooter's Hill and the new station on Hampstead Heath ; which distance, although it has not, perhaps, been obtained so correctly as many others, yet is determined with sufficient accuracy for the matter Trigonometrical Survey. 567 in hand. When the observations were made on Severndroog Tower, in the year 1787, the angle between Hanger Hill Tower and the cross on the dome of St, Paul’s was taken: this was now made use of, in order to get the angle between Hanger Hill Tower and Hampstead Heath ; because the former station could — not be discovered, on account of the wind blowing the thick and darkened atmosphere of London between the stations, when the instrument this year was carried to Shooter’s Hill. For the purpose of connecting the eastern and western tri- angles with each other, a station was chosen on Southweald Tower, accessible only to the small instrument. Brentwood Spire was also found to be conveniently situated for carrying on the distances: this will be readily perceived by the plan. Lang- don Hill was also selected; which, with the former station at Gravesend, were to become the means of connecting the tri- angles. A station on Epping Forest was judged necessary : but no spot could be found fit for general purposes, the view towards the north being confined. One was, however, fixed on, ealled Highbeech, from which a high building near Berkham- stead was found to be visible, by means of which, the distances in the north of Essex could be verified, as the station on the top of it would connect with Bushy Heath, near Watford, and a point on the elevated range near Dunstable. From Hampstead, the instrument and portable scaffold were carried to Langdon Hill, and from thence to Triptree Heath, near Malden; from whence the party repaired to Highbeech, leaving the remainder of the county to be surveyed with the small circular instrument; which seems to have been done with considerable accuracy. _ After the necessary observations were made at Highbeech, I 4 De 568 The Account of a proceeded to Shotover Hill, in Oxfordshire; and, before May elapsed, had reconnoitred the country. As the distance between Inkpin Hill and Highclere, appeared to be shorter than was ne- cessary for a base on which the northern triangles were to rest, it became certain, that their sides would depend on the base on Hounslow Heath. The only means by which the series now pro- posed to be carried westwards, (for the double purpose of forward- ing the survey, and also of finding a portion of the meridional arc, ) could be properly connected with the triangles in the neigh- bourhood of Salisbury Plain, was the side just spoken of ; for the high land in the vicinity of Calne, intercepted the view of the stations on the Marlborough range, from White Horse Hill. In ~ order, however, to make a connection, although imperfect, an intermediate station was chosen on this high intercepting land. When the ground about Nettlebed was formerly examined by us, it appeared difficult to carry on the triangles from Bagshot Heath towards the northward; because no spot could be found near the former, from which the Chiltern range could be seen. I now, therefore, departed from the usual practice of choosing stations on the ground, and selected Pen Church Tower; by means of which, I found a connection might be made between the triangles carried round the Chiltern range, from White Horse Hill and Nuffield, with'those in Hertfordshire, At Shotover Hill the party separated, each having its instru- ment. I shall close this article, without entering minutely into the reasons which operated with me for the choice of all the stations selected this year. I shall content myself with enumera- ting the namesof the stations visited and observed, and mentioning that Shotover Hill and Cumner Hill, in Oxfordshire, were select- ed principally with a view of ascertaining the situations of the Trigonometrical Survey. 569 observatories at Oxford and Blenheim. The namesof the stations were, Nuffield, White Horse Hill, and Scutchamfly, in Berkshire. Shotover Hill, Cumner Hill, Whiteham Hill, Crouch Hill, and Epwell Hill, all in Oxfordshire. ‘Those in Gloucestershire were, Pen, Cleave, Broadway Beacon, and the Malvern Hills. The Lecky Hills, in Worcestershire. Corley and Nuneaton, in War- wickshire. Bardon Hill, Naseby Field and Barrow Hill, in Leicestershire. Arbury Hill, and Souldrop, in Northamptonshire. Quainton, Brill, Wendover, and Bow Brickhill, in Buckingham- shire. Woburn Park, and Lidlington, in Bedfordshire. Kins- worth, Lillyhoe, Berkhamstead, Tharfield, and Bushy Heath, in Hertfordshire. From the last mentioned station, the party returned to London, in October. Art. vi. Angles taken in the Year 1799. On Hampstead Heath, Between . sai Al Mean. Hanger Hill Tower and Stanmore = KO 52) 15575 }iSies : 7 7 Highbeech and Shooter’s Hill a = Wo) GN 2 gan 7 3455 i = Highbeech and St. Paul’s, London - - gh FE725 Uo ; 22,75. Severndroog Tower on Shooter’s Hill, and Hanger Hill Tower 117 22 13 } At Langdon Hill. Gravesend and Severndroog Tower - - 53 47 25 Centre of Rayleigh Steeple and Gravesend - - 122.2 46 Station on Rayleigh Steeple and centre of the same - Q (o'27 Station ‘on Rayleigh Steeple and Danbury Spire - 43 18 Severndroog ‘lower and Frierning Steeple - - 05 25.0 Frierning Steeple and Station on Rayleigh Steeple - 88 14 I9 Frierning Steeple and Danbury Spire - - 45 26 17 Severndroog Tower and Brentwood Spire = - 66 26 39 570 The Account of a At Tripiree Heath. Between $ | jjleasan : Tillingham Steeple and Station on Rayleigh Steeple - 68 28 58 ‘6 Tillingham Steeple and Danbury Spire - - 100 28 21 Station on Rayleigh Tower and Langdon Hill - 21 25 14 Station on Rayleigh Tower and Frierning Steeple a a oe At Highbeech. Severndroog Tower and Brentwood Spire - - 71.16 43 } 44 ) eae 7 Severndroog Tower and Southweald - eS €% 37 27 has 7 29 Severndroog Tower and Hampstead “ - 58 28 18 jus | ‘ - 18 Cross on the Dome of St. Paul’s and Hampstead - - 83 111 Berkhamstead Gazebo and Hampstead - = 438 29 57 8 39 0 5°55 | At Shotover Hill. | Nufiield and White Horse Hill 3 : 81 53 27575 Log 9 | | 29575) ae Scutchamfly Barrow and White Horse Hill e - 26 8." 7,75 7275 ¢8 8,25 . White Horse Hill and Whiteham Hill - - 48 5-31.25 ) 32575 732375 33975 Wendover and Scutchamfly Barrow = ree 117 30 55 } 56 57225 On Whitebam Hill. i Shotover Hill and White Horse Hill - - 114 54 34575 } 34 | 34075 J #75 Shotover Hill and Cumner Hill - - = 55 52 3495 has 3595 Staff over the Quadrant at Blenheim and White Horse Hill 131 25 34,5 } 36,5 3895 .7 On Cumner Hill. Whiteham Hill and Shotover Hill : - - 99 29 47 } 4855 4955 : Shotover Hill and Atlas on the Top of the } - 29 23 34 } ' Observatory at Oxford 34 34 Trigonometrical Survey. On White Horse Hill. . Between Nuffield and Shotover Hill ia: - - Nuffield and Brill : “te Pind sie Scutchamfly Barrow and Shotover Hill - - Whiteham Hill and Staff on Blenheim Observatory - Brill and Stow on the Wold = - = Station near Calne and Inkpin - = _- Highclere and Inkpin - - - Highclere and Nuffield - - - - | | At Nuffield. Bagshot Heath and Highclere thie - Highclere and White Horse Hill - < White Horse Hill and Shotover Hill - = White Horse Hill and Brill - mihi: = - On Scutchamfly Barrow. White Horse Hill and Shotover Hill - - Shotover Hill and Wendover ° - - = At Stow on the Wold. Cleave and Broadway Beacon - - “ o ‘ 95: 34 38 48 {Ii 47 10 30 64 45 67 10 TZ 63°17 53 33 62 32 86 4 54.44 571 4 Mean 22325 | 4 23,75 [72 11,5 15525 a 50 4355 } ; on ¢ 44075 J 49°73 28,5 3235 fos 11,25 eee alae) me 53g fro 16,5 17375 18,75 5495 5495 37 55975 57 572 The Account of a Between Broadway Beacon and Epwell > - Epwell and Brill - - = - White Horse Hill and Cleave ° - At Broadway Beacon. Epwell and Stow - 2 - Stow and Cleave 2 “ 5 Cleave and Malvern Hills o S “2 Malvern and Lecky Hills * 2 2 At Epwell. Stow and Broadway Beacon ° a = Stow and Brill ~ = = u Brill and Arbury Hill - - = Arbury Hill and Corley = - = At Corley. Bardon Hill and Nuneaton Common = . Nuneaton and Arbury Hill - - s © og as Mean. 72 38 485 ) , 49 74995 5055 60 56 6 05 bs } 635 109 40 36,25 36375 37°75 69 10 3075 | 3155 31575 32,75 | 78 53 6 8 775 995 60 28 12,5 17,75 p16 18 L 53 53 19% bios 38 10 43,25 4355 44 P44 44525 | 44,5 J 86 29 13 1305 ¢1395 13575 85 o 16,5 2055 54 55 1735 19 718,75 20,25 18,5 49 54 cd, 53 51975 110 20 52 $255 oe ike 53 Trigonometrical Survey. 573 Between Cp Mage Mean Arbury Hill and Epwell - - - 35 17 34575 3575 36,25 39575 geen ; 39.25 J Epwell and Broadway Beacon - - - Za? ae l 49975 “ 39575 Nuneaton and Lecky Hills - - - - 153) 25 0S 5 Nuneaton and Station near Birmingham - * 49 54 5275 } 52 At Arbury Hill. Quainton and Brill - ° - 16 12 37525 | ; Basal 40,5 p40 Brill and Epwell - - - - Go s5)420) iy ‘Near Brill on the Hill. White Horse Hill and Stow - - - 50 14 44 t 4455 44575 Nuffield and White Horse Hill - = tho Suna Sm a iz 395 Stow and Epwell - - - - 32 34 we 435 Epwell and Arbury Hill - - F 34 23 56 }ss 5 :; 58575 Arbury Hill and Bow Brickhill = - - 68 20 7,75 Bow Brickhill and Wendover - - = 57 25 ‘\ 5 2 ty Wendover and Shotover Hill - - - 108 5 22 f. 2505°- J 71 Quainton and Wendover - + - SI 34433925 }33 3275 Near Wendover. Scutchamfly Barrow and Shotover Hill —- - 28 212,95 MDCcc, 4, E 574 Between Mee ’ Brill and Quainton = PBR eta - - Brill aa Bow Brickhill = - Sa Tis ig a Brill and pee Hill - tonhael Galle edored. Bow Brickhill and Stanmore > oie Kaen Pen Tower and Stanmore aa - OO See a orstuomh Near Quainton. ee Bow Brickhill and Wendover - _ events: 23. i Wendover and Brill - esa Neh “ | At Bow Brickhill, Brill and Arbury Hill =n oe Oa : . Sbih: Mud ta oe B ill d ; ~ . — ir -_ * uf rill an Wendover | ute, bolt 73.34 Wendover and Kinsworth cel wT Sie huasl Taye Rie ne ai rol die A AS! Kinsworth and Quainton sé = - ae Kinsworth and Lillyhoe —« : ase ae ate e} ake Kinsworth and Lidlington 2 a ee tia eo See Trusler Hill and Lillyhoe . - mit - ; Som tes TS Trusler Hill and Arbury Hill 5 5 a At Kinsworth,« | Brill and Bow Brickhill _ . = are A eB ei ae ~ fea wai Quarta and ag Brickhill ye oh? oP at: . ‘ : mY VL Pt | OE qowes ote bis Trigonometrical Survey. Between F Bow Brickhill and Lillyhoe - Lillyhoe and Tharfield Tower me a Tharfield and Station on Gazebo at Berkhamstead - Stanmore and Berkhamstead a = Bow Brickhill and Stanmore S = # Near Lillyboe. Bow Brickhill and Kinsworth ~ 4 Lidliigton and Bow Brickhill ° . “ Bow Brickhill and Trusler Hill is 4 Station on the Ground near Tharfield Tower and Kinsworth At Lidlington. Kinsworth and Bow Brickhill - - i At Crouch Hill. Brill and Epwell © - - ° At Stanmore. Wendover and Kinsworth - Sy Pen Tower and Wendover - « 5 Bagshot and Pen Tower - = - Bagshot Heath and Hanger Hill Tower - - 4,E2 575 AP ae ey Mean 82 50 26 | A 30 3935 35 J 12 12 39,75 ve haours 50 2 5555 50 be s,2s 3 055 1 41 15 5655 57975 j 57325 173 37 43 } i” a 54 58 52,5 5255 53275 23 59 s hax 5 §2 1155 66 ; 1 ae paGves 68 16 19 ] 22575 (22,25 25525 145 23 25575 27 } 26,25 37 41 an) Eas Gale 23. 4 4755 | 4755 47975 (4855 49,25 49,25 J 49 32 2955 59 55 54525 53.75 } 54 576 The Account of a Between ; of)" oMiegn. Hampstead Heath and Hanger Hill Tower , - ©) (45) 255%) ae 5155 51,5 Joos A 52575 On Bushy Heath. Wendover and Kinsworth - - is 38 22 «5 } f= a 8,5 275 On Bagshot Heath. Station of 1794. Highclere and Nuffield - - - 55 32 2555 25,75 °26 26575 Nuffield and Pen Tower - - - 48 47 11 12,75 61295 12,75 Pen Tower and St. Ann’s Hill - - - 70. 30 37525 } . 39 }svas 40 ART. 7. Situations of the Stations. Trevose Head. The station on this point of land, which is about four miles from Padstow, in Cornwall, is situated on the southern part of it, and is about forty feet from the declivity. The ground seems a little higher than any other part of the Head. Cadon Barrow. The station is on the centre of the Barrow; which is a very remarkable one, and well known about the country. It is about two miles from Tintagel, being in a field lying south of the road leading from that town to Camelford. Brown Willy. The staff is erected on the highest part of this mountain, which is about nine miles southward of Camelford. St. Stephen’s Down. The station is about 150 feet from the eastern part of the building erected on this Down. It lies south- west from the corner of it, and about twenty feet from the road. Mendip. The station is in a field on the top of the down, beng about two miles north of Shepton Mallet. The field is next to the road leading from that place to Bristol, and lies west of it: it is also north of the road which goes from Wells to Frome. Trigonometrical Survey. 577 This road crosses the former at right angles. The station is 20 feet north of the southern hedge, and about 200. from the eastern one. ‘The ground round the station is rather higher than any other part of the field. _ Dundry. The station is on the down, close to, but west of, the town so called. The down is full of holes and pits, from which stones have been taken for the purposes of building. The ‘station, however, may easily be found, as it is situated on a rising . which has the appearance of having been a barrow. - Lansdown. This place is well known, and near Bath. The station is on the highest part of the broken ground called Crom- WELL’s Camp, which is near Mr. GranviILLE’s monument. Farley Down. The station on this Down is 5 feet north of the stone wall, and about 150 feet eastward of the plantation. Bradley Knoll. This is a remarkable hill, very near Maiden Bradley. The highest part of the hill is towards the west, on which there is a small ring, exhibiting an appearance of a ruined plantation. The station is a few feet to the northward of this ring. laresbyct he _ Westbury Down. There are no objects on. this Down, of any kind ; therefore, the station cannot be found from measurements. It is, however, just above the White horse cut out in the side of the hill. tow! eel atta | Ash Beacon. This eminence is about four miles north of Sher- borne :,on the top of it there is a small plantation, round which is a circular wall. ‘The station is 85 feet east of it. Dundon Beacon. Thisisan insulated hill, at the eastern extre- mity of King’s Sedgemoor ; upon it are the remains of a barrow, probably the site of the ancient beacon. ‘The station is about 4, feet eastward of the small cavity in the centre of it. 578 The Account of a. Lugshorn Corner, the eastern extremity of King’s Sedgemoor. There is a small rivulet, which separates the moor from the cul- tivated ground on the Somerton side, and, close to a particular part of it, is a passage called Somerton Gate. About a quarter of a mile eastward of this entrance, and in the second field, north of the stream, is the station called Lugshorn Corner, one of the ends of the base. The spot is 5 feet from the ditch, and 19 from the gateway. There were but three fields in this part of the moor, at the time the base was measured. Greylock’s Foss. This is towards the western extremity of the moor: a causeway leads from Middlezoy to Greinton, over it. In the second field from the bridge, near the latter, is the other extremity of the base. The station is about 10 feet from the ditch, running parallel to the Foss, and is in the angle formed by the ditch contiguous to the road and the second sya north of the drain. Nuffield. The station is in the field ae to the church: it is in the south-west comer of it, 14 feet from the stile, and 10 feet from the hedge. Scutchamfly. A very remarkable Barrow, on the Berkshire downs, situated near Little Hendred. The station is on the south-west part of it, and can easily be found. White Horse Hill. This is a well known eminence in Berk- shire. The station is on the eastern side of the Saxon work, and on the top of the small parapet surrounding the ditch. — Shotover Hill, near Oxford. The station is 150 feet from the hedge eastward of it, and 60 feet from that southward of it; but, when the traces of our former operations are obliterated,” it will be difficult to recover this station. | qf Stow on the Wold, The station bearing this name, isina Trigonometrical Survey. 579 field 2 miles eastward of the town: it lies on the north side of the road leading from Stow to Burford, and may be easily dis- tinguished, being that particular field which affords the most commanding view. The station is 32 feet west of the corner ‘ of the hedge which forms a right angle with another abruptly running out: it is also 279 feet from the ridge which divides the field. © Dm, Broadway Beacon.- This is a very high and remarkable spot, near the village of Broadway, in Gloucestershire. The station is about 20 feet south-east of the foundation of a building pro- posed to be erected by the Earl of Coventry. Corley, a village in Warwickshire. The station is in the second field eastward of the church, being 180 feet from the eastern hedge, and 290 feet from the stile in the corner of it. Epwell, a village in Oxfordshire. The station is on the apex of the hill, and may easily be found, by measuring 17 feet from the stile, and 14, feet from the hedge which runs across the hill. N.B. The station is west of the hedge. Brill on the Hill, Buckinghamshire. The station ison Muzzle Hill, near the town. There is but one field on this hill: it is on the highest part of it. The station is situated in the centre of the field, and in the middle of a rising, once the site of a windmill. _ Arbury Hill. This hill is still surrounded with the remains of an ancient fortification. The station is on the north-west corner of it, and near the brow, but cannot be easily found, from the want of proper objects to which measurements may be made. Wendover, Buckinghamshire. The station is on the down south of the town, and contiguous to the village of Ellesborough, A road from Wendover, to Sir J oun RUSSELL’S seat, Checquers, runs over the down: but, as there are no marks on it, its pre- 580 The Account of a. cise situation cannot be easily pointed out by measurement. It may, however, be observed, that it is 14, feet peer the decayed parapet on the top of the hill. PIG: 4, b rt Quainton, Buckinghamshire. The station is on the high ground, north of this town. It cannot very easily be found, because the hill is destitute of objects; yet it may, probably, be discovered, by looking for it on the green ridge which divides the land: it is in the middle of that boundary, and about 200 feet westward of the pathway. — Kinsworth, a village near Dunstable. The station is on the summit of a hill, about half a mile north of the village. A hedge runs across the hill, from which the station is 40 feet north- west : it is likewise close to the road. 92 Lillyboe, Hertfordshire. The station is on a sonically eminence, having the Icknield way at the foot of it. There are no objects on this hill, therefore the precise situation cannot be pointed out by means of measurement : it is towards the north- west corner of the hill. aol | Stanmore. This station is on the southern extremity of the range above the town: it is near the trees, and a sin to the westward of the broken ground. Bushy Heath, near Stanmore, The station cannot be aby found : it is about 1000 feet from the road, but there areno ob- jects near enough to determine it by measurement. | Wrotham. This station is 2054 feet north-east of the old station: it may be easily found, with the assistance of a theodo- lite, Severndroog Tower making an angle of 94° 19’ = the new Station. Gravesend. The station is on Windmill Hill, and on the western side of it: it is about 50 feet south of the stile, and near the brow. Trigonometrical Survey. 581 Gad’s Hill, Kent. The station is very easily found, being in the middle of the tumulus. Sheppey, Isle of. The station is on the bare hill, westward of, and contiguous to, the high range: it cannot be found through means of measurement. Hampstead. The station is on the heath, but cannot easily be found, on account of the rugged and broken ground which sur- rounds it: it is situated 40 feet from the road, and among the sand holes. Langdon Hill, Essex. The station is in the middle of the field on the top of this hill: it is about 400 feet from either of the stiles. Hadleigh, The station is on a remarkable hill, in shape very like a barrow, and is abouta mile south-west of the town. Southend. The station is in the second field westward from the terrace: it cannot be easily found. Interior Stations. Hope's Nose, the north projecting point of Torbay. The only spot fit fora station in this part is the one chosen: it can easily be found, for it is the high and bare rising, just above the Nose. Ball’s Obelisk. This object is on the eastern part of Great Haldon, in Devonshire. The station can be easily found, for it is close to the gate of the inclosure, and on the only spot not covered with heath. Evercrutch, in Somersetshire. The hill on which the station is, commands an extensive view, and is not far from the town of Evercrutch. Bruton is also near it. The station isin the middle of the flat place on the top of the hill. Crouch Hill, near Banbury, in Oxfordshire. . The hill is well MDCCC. AF | 582 The Account of a known, and the station easily found; for the apex of the hill appears as if it were truncated, and in the middle of the smooth part is the station. Cumner Hill, near Oxford. The station is about 130 feet westward from the centre of the clump of trees. Whitebam Hill, Oxfordshire. There are a few trees contiguous to the station, which bear eastward from it, and are about 80 feet distant. The station is on the highest and smoothest part of the hill. Lidlingion, a village near Ampthill in Bedfordshire. This station can easily be found, for a tumulus, whose centre is the station, has been erected, to render it conspicuous. Trusler Hill, in Woburn Park. The station is on a tumulus likewise ; and can be found without any difficulty. Stations in Essex, Suffolk, and Hertfordshire. Prittlewell Steeple. Rayleigh Steeple. The station is in the north-east corner, 20 inches from the north parapet, and 4, feet from the eastern one. Danbury Steeple. The instrument was placed in the four angles of the Steeple, as circumstances rendered it necessary. The points are readily found, as there is scarcely room in the corners to place an instrument. Stations were also selected on the following Steeples, &c. Canewden Steeple. West Mersea St. Little Bentley St. Frierning St. Colchester, St. Mary’s Staircase. | Woodbridge St. Tillingham St. Tattingstone St. ~ Butely St. Thorp St. Rushmere St. Otley St. Stoke St. Great Tey St. Henley St. Dover Court St. St. Osyth Priory, Flagstaff. Falkenham St. Peldon St. Shoebury Ness, Staff. Copdaock St. Trigonometrical Survey §83 Naughton St. Beauchamp Roding St. Westham St. Lavenham St. - Hornchurch St. Barking, Staireasé. Balmer St. Naseing St. Berkhampstead, Ga- Giemsford St. Henham onthe Mount St. _—_zebo. Toppesfield St. Thorley St. .. Gallywood Common. Twinestead St. Albury St. Purfleet Cliff. Southweald St. Elmdon St. Babraham Mount. Pleshley St. Rickling St. Epping Mill, Base. High Easter St. Thaxted St. Brentwood Spire, sur- HatfieldBroad Oak St. Balsham St. veyed round, Stations in Kent. Frant Steeple. Station of 1787. Seal Chart. Ash St. Botley Hill. Do. __ Tunbridge St. North Fleet St. Chiddingstone St. Oxford Mount. Stockbury St. Mount Sion. Silverden Farm. Hernhill St. East Peckham St. Well Hill. Tudely St. Crayford St. The stations chosen for the survey of Essex, and parts of the adjoining counties, as also for completing the survey of Kent, are mostly towers, as may be seen from the above. When the tops of the towers have been smooth and even, the stations were always in the centres of them; but, when they were covered with roofs, or had spires upon them, stations were chosen in the most convenient places, and staffs always erected. I have omitted giving the measurements by which the stations may be exactly found, Rayleigh and Prittlewell excepted, in order to avoid swelling this article to an inconvenient length. 4,F 2 xe Lhe Account of a Art. vitt. Particulars relating to. the Base on King’s Sedgemoor, and the Reduction of that Base. Pilate XXVIII. Comparisons of the Chains. As the chains, after the measurement on Salisbury Plain, -were oiled, and laid up in the Tower, no apprehensions were entertained that either of them was elongated by the rusting of the joints. It was, however, our wish to have compared them with each other, previous to the commencement of this operation, and attempts were made, but rendered unsatisfactory, from the want of sufficient firmness in the soil. It was not till we arrived at the 7oth chain, that a good opportunity presented itself: the measuring chain A, was then compared with the standard B, and found to be thirteen divisions of the micrometer head, attached to the brass scale, in excess. In these trials, the tem- perature remained constant; the mercury in FAHRENHEIT’s thermometer being at 662°. | The 50-feet chain, spoken of in a former article, came from the hands of Mr. Ramspen without being very accurately mea- sured ; therefore it now became proper to ascertain its length, by means of the standard chain. This was accordingly done at the present time; when B was found to exceed twice the length of the 50-feet chain, by 14 divisions of the micrometer screw ; the thermometer, at the time of trial, standing at 69”. At the conclusion of the measurement, the chains were again compared, when the working chain A, was found to exceed the standard, 174 divisions on the micrometer head : this was after 273 chains were measured. Now, when 70 chains only had been measured, the difference between A and B was 13 of those Trigonometrical Survey, 585 divisions; consequently 174— 13,4, divisions, was the wear of B, in measuring 203 chains. Therefore, the whole wear is found by this proportion, viz. 203 : 44 :: 273 : 5,223 divisions, == ;2, ofan inch; which very inconsiderable quantity, like the wear on Salisbury Plain, no doubt, arose from the pivots and pivot holes of the joints being polished by continual use. This supposition seems just; as the wear oi the chain, after the measurement on Hounslow Heath, was found to be much greater. The length of the chain A, as well as that of the standard B, ‘was accurately ascertained by Mr. RamspEn, in the year 1793, as particularly shewn in the Philosophical Transactions for 1795. In the temperature of 54°, A was found to exceed 100 feet, +425 of an inch; therefore, adding the wear which took place on Salisbury Plain, wiz. 52, part of an inch, we get the length of A at the commencement of the measurement on Sedgemoor = 100,01009 feet. From repeated trials, as before observed, the standard B was found to exceed the length of twice that of the new fifty-feet chain, 14 divisions of the micrometer head; and, after the mea- surement, the same chain fell short of A, 17Lof those divisions : hence, A exceeds twice the length of the 50-feet chain, 31+ divi- sions. Therefore the length of the short chain, in the temperature of 54°, may be taken at 50,00075 feet. 586 The Account of a Art. 1x. Table of ithe Measurement of the Base of Verification on King’s Sedgemoor. Spaces Mean Spaces Mean Spaces Days. | measured. | temp. by Days. | measured. | temp. by Days. | measured. Yards. 15 therm, Yards. 15 therm. Yards, July 100 | 69,7 3200 | 79,27 6300 200 | 65,56 3300 | 79,96 6400 iI 300 | 62,73 25 3400 | 62,06 6500 400 | 67,40 |}. 3500 | 65,90 6600 500 | 64,10 26 3600 | 67,63 6700 iz 600 | 65,30 3700 | 65,83 6800 700 | 73,40 Zz, 3800 | 67,72 6900 800 | 69,36 3900 | 75553 7000 g20 | 68,06 4000 | 71,40 7190 13 1000 | 66,05 AIOO | 71523 7200 1100 | 70,30 4200 | 67,14 7300 1200 | 69,33 31 4300 | 66,56 7400 1300 | 62,83 ||Aug. I 4400 | 71,16 7500 14 1400 | 63,93 2 4500 | 64,60 7600 1500 | 61,40 4600 | 65,16 7700 1600 | 57,03 4700 | 68,16 7800 16 1709 | 66,36 4800 70,16 7900 1800 | 65,80 4900 | 76,23 8000 1900 71,03 5@00 70,06 8100 17 2000 | 75,70 5100 | 64,23 82c0 2100 | 80,43 3 5200 | 64,46 8300 2200.1) 77554 5300 | 63,96 8400 18 2300 | 65,96 5400 | 63,86 8500 2400 | 69,79 5500 | 67,13 8600 2500 | 69,56 - 4 5600 | 73,53 8700 2600 | 68,16 5700 | 73,84 ‘8800 19 2700 | 68,19 5800 | 69,83 8900 2800 | 72,66 5g00 | 65,86 gooo 2900 | 69,23 6000.| 61,50 1 g100 21 3000 | 70,76 6100 | 76,46 16 |9225,4943 3100 | 79,68 6200 | 84,26 | Trigonometrical Survey. Art. x. Reduction of the Base. _ The overplus of the 273d chain was measured by Mr. Ramspen, and found to be 29,517 feet; §87 Feet. wherefore, the apparent length of the base was = 27676,4830 From the measurement in the Riding-house of his Grace the Duke of Marisoroveu, the chain A was found to exceed 100 feet, in the temperature of 54°, 0,11425 parts of an inch; to which, add- ing the wear by the measurement on Salisbury Plain, viz. +45, and also balf the wear by the measurement of this base, wz. ;4, part of an inch, =" for the excess of the chain’s length we se above 100 dg therefore,“ x 279,8 = 29,7075 feet ; which add = = a = The sum of all the degrees gat Mal the ther- mometer was 98511; wherefore," — 54 x 272,8 ° a == 3,1069 feet; which ae add iy Reatte from the comparison of the s50-feet chain with the standard B, it appeared that the excess above 50 feet, in the temperature of 54°, was0,0g075 9,09075 parts of an inch; therefore, x 8 = 0,0605 parts of a foot. This likewise add - The sum of all the degrees shewn by the ther- mometers placed by the sides of the s0-feet chain, was 1372; therefore “> — 54 x 4x2 = 0,0365 parts of a foot: and this add - - + 257075 +3,1069 +0,0605 +0,0365 27682,3944, 588 The Account of a | 276823944 And, for the reduction of the base to the tempe- rature of 62°, viz. for 8° on the brass scale, we have oclagy Keree xe ==2,2497 feet ; which subtract —2,24.97 Therefore, the length of the base is - 2 feet 27680,1447 which, neglecting decimals, may be taken at 27680 feet. As to the probable error of the above conclusion, I know not how to form a just opinion. On ground sufficiently hard, and otherwise favourable, I think a base of 5 miles might be mea- sured so accurately, as to afford a result not differing from the truth more than three inches : but, on this occasion, I should not suppose the error can be less than six, nor more than nine inches. Motives for adopting this supposition, have been related in a foregoing article. ART. x1. Calculation of the Sides of certain principal Triangles in Cornwall and Devonshire. Plate XXVII. Distance from Hensbarrow to St. Agnes Beacon, 97084,8 Feet. Phil. Trans. 1797. p+ 461. No. of ‘Observed : Spheri- easels Names of stations. angles, Diff. ne EXCCSS, | Angles corrected} Error. | for calculation, | Distances. o 46 7] 7) a u oO 4 v7] Feet. 1. |St. Agnes Beacon 47 10 0575 |—0,15 47 10 3,25 Hensbarrow - - | 67 6 13,25{—0,58 67,6413 Trevose Head - 65 43 47. |—0,57 65 43 43:75 180 oO 1 1,31 |—0,31 ieesinate Agnes Beacon - 98108,1 Trevose Head from { Hensbarrow a -, | .78099.9 are ec Trigonometrical Survey. 589 Distance from Hensbarrow to Bodmin Down, 4733752 Feet. Phil. Trans. 1797. p- 460. No. of : Observed Spheri= Angles corrected triangles Names of stations. angles, cal trror. | for calculation, 4 Distances. | EXCESS. Se | coerce | RSS eee oO 44 7) Feet. tr. |Hensbarrow + - | 77 20 18,5 77 20 17, 5 Bodmin Down - | 68 21 58,25 | 68 21 57525 Trevose Head - 34 17 4555 34. 17 45525 180 ° 2525 0,86 Lae Bodmin Down - 81967,6 Trevose Head from { Panebatrow 78093 Mean distance from Hensbarrow to Se Head, 78096,4 feet. 111. ?Trevose Head - 42 33 52 —0,32] 42 33 os 25 Bodmin Down - 7155 27. |—0,43 Py 55 26575 Cadon Barrow -f[ .. . 65 30 42,0 revose Head - 85625 Cadon Barrow from {r Bedwin Down °C 63 925 iv. |Bodmin Down - | 30 58 13 |-0,05 30 §8 12,75 Cadon Barrow - -| 43 49 50,5 |—0,04 43 49 50 Brown Willy - - = iss ie lak, ites Il 57:25 ‘ Bodmin Down : - | 43722 Brown Willy from { tie Dit owe te 4 32488 Distance from Carraton Hill to Maker Heights, 82600,3 feet, Phil. Trans. 1797. p..458- v. arraton Hill - -|74 § 22,5 |—0,60 74° 5° 21758 Maker Heights - 53 429 |—0,48 34 28575 Black Down - + | 52 50 9,75|—0,48 52 50 955 180 O 1,25 1 1,57|~0,32 Maker Heights - = | 99680 Black Down from { Carraton Hill < = $2860,4. MDCCC. » 4G : 590 The Account of a Observed f Spheri- angles. Diff. cal | Error, €XCess. Angles corrected No. of for calculation. triangles Names of stations, °

51 26 42. |—0,13 51 26 41,75 ' Mintern - - | 94 14 23 |—0;32 94 14 2255 ) -|180. 0 1,25 | 0559 -+0,66 . HitiBeacon!. 77991 0,4 ' 59166,6 pee Or { Bull Barrow . = e __—,: | 4265347 SSS _ Semre, (Pilsden! Oo! id [eR liigh uo) tojew i 135° 3 (05751 Ash Beacon - AQ 21 38,25 |—o,24 49 21 38 Mintern— - 95) 135,22... .\—0,60 95 35 21,25 180 O 1,25 | 1,08 40,17 : Ash. Beacon = “ 102535 Pilsden from { Minteta Ds Heee 8177.6 In our last account, (see Phil. Trans. 1797. p. 455 and 456.) the distance from Bull Barrow to Mintern was found to be 42653,4 feet; and the distance from Pilsden to Mintern 78177 feet. The distances derived from.the above triangles are very nearly the same; a difference of a few inches only existing between them. 596 _- The Account of a No. of Observed Angles corrected triangles} | Names of stations. angles. Diff. for calculation. | Distances. Ole tn Vis “ eee LP) Feet. xx111.{Moor Lynch - 57 19 325 |—-0,64 57 19 255 Ash Beacon “ 76 2 36,5 {—0,39 76 2 36 Pilsden - = Li peas et 46 38 21,5 Pilsden from Moor Lynch - - 118230 But Pilsden was also observed from Dundon Beacon ; from which, and the angle observed at Moor Lynch, between Dundon Beacon and Pilsden; results the following triangle. xx1iv.|Moor Lynch: - = | 56 43 36,75|+0,03 56 43 3655 Dundon Beacon - {108 1 52 |—0,64 108 1 $1575 Pilsden - - Eee ty 15 14 31575 Pilsden from Moor Lynch = = awe 118233,6.. Hence, the mean distance from Moor Lynch to Pilsden is 118231,8 feet; and this is the side from which the series about to be carried on, for the survey of the north of Devonshire, is to originate. _ In the triangle formed by the stations on Mendip Hills, Bradley Knoll, and Westbury Down, the distance between the first and last is 92954,0 feet; but, computing with the mean distance from Mendip to Bradley Knoll, (61962, feet, ) as found from both bases, the distance from Mendip to Westbury Down proves to be 92955,9 _ feet; which distance is used in the remaining principal triangles in this quarter. dtmall xxv. |Farley Down - - | 77 21 53,75 |-=0,44 77 21 S295 Westbury Down - | 63 42 51,25 }—0,34 63 42 49,75 Mendip Hills - 38 55 1725 }—0,3° , 38 55 1735 180 O 255 1,1@|-+ 1,40 Mendip from Farley Down - - - } 85412,2 Westbury Down - - 9295 509 Trigonometrical Survey. 597 Jv No. of f Observed | Spheri- Angles corrected] triangles. Names of stations. angles Diff. cal Error. | for calculation. | Distances. excess. OM TN ys ” a a Oath Feet. xxvi. [Mendip - - | 60 36 15,5 |—0,40 60 36 15 Dundry - - | 69 52 22 “|—0,44 69 52 22 Farley Down - | 49 31 23,5 |—0,37 49 31 23 130 0" FT 1,21 |—0,21 ; Farley Down - - © | 7925553 Dundry from {Mendip ke z 69196 xxV1II.|Mendip - - | 41 3 58,5 |—o,25 41 3 58,25 Dundry - - | 83 34 18 |—0o,40 83 34 1755 Lansdown - -]| . : 55 21 44,25 Lansdown from Neeoiire i pais 8357352 5524902 xxvit1.j]Dundry - - 13 41 56,25 |—0,09 13 41 56 |Farley Down - 27 5 27,5 |—0,11 27. > 27325 Lansdown - -| .. . 139 12 36,75 ec | ee | me | Farley Down - 2873054 Lansdown from iad es is - | 55248,7 Wherefore, the mean distance from Dundry to Lansdown is 52248,9 feet. ART. x11. Calculation of the sides of certain principal Triangles, carried on from the side Bagshot Heath and Highclere, towards the north, Plate XXXI. Distance from Bagshot Heath to Highclere, 142952,6 feet. Phil. Trans. 1795. p. 496. xx1x. |Bagshot Heath - | 55 32 26 |—o,89) 55 32 25,25 Highclere - 46 10 18,25 |—0,83 46 10 17375]. Nuffield - - | 78 17 18,25 |—1,20 Zo LF Uz 180 ©O 2,5 2,94 |—0,43 Nuffield an eee Heath - = |105321,2 Highclere - ° 120374 MDCCC. 4H 598 The Account of a No. of i Observed ! Spheri- Angles corrected} _. triangles. Names of stations. angles. Diff. cal Error. | for calculation, | Distances. excess. B pean 1 y, Fi ee Lbs Bah Feet. xxx, |White Horse Hill | 63 7 53,25 |—0,94 63. 7 53:5 Highclere - - | 63 18 16,75 |—0,94 63 18 17 : Nuffield - - | 53 33 49.5 |—0,86 63 33 4995 179, 59 5955 204 Weig2* 4 é i Nuffield - - 120557,7 White Horse Hill from Highclere ¢ 10856351 Distance from Beacon Hill to Highclere, 98694,4 feet. Phil. Trans. 1795. p. 497. xxxI, |Beacon Hill - - | 17 42 38,5 |—0,12 17 42 38,25 Highclere - -| 56 0 29,75|+0,08 56 0 29,25 " Inkpin Hill - + |106 16 53,25|—0,47 106 16 52,5 180 0 155 0,50 }+41,0 dai? Highclere - = 31278,8 Inkpin Hill from 4 po >on Hill wwe iia xxx. |Highclere - - | 34 27 50,75|+0,38 34 27 50,75 Inkpin Hill - 133 27 57,5 |—9.91 e133) 27.55 ‘ White Horse Hill | 12 4 11,5 |+0,04 IZ 4 11525 179 59 5975 0,49 |—1,24 ‘ White Horse Hill from ip itecn he z i 108565,5 Inkpin - - - | 84647,1 In the following computations, I shall use 120557,” feet for the dis- tance between White Horse Hill and Nuffield: this is derived from the base on Hounslow Heath. By the last triangle, White Horse Hill, from Highclere, is distant 108565,5 feet; which is computed from the base on Salisbury Plain. ‘The distance between those stations, found by the second of the above triangles, is 108563,1 feet. “There- fore, whether the distance between White Horse Hill and Nuffield be founded on the base measured on Salisbury Plain, or Hounslow Heath, nearly the same conclusion is derived: the difference will Trigonometrical Survey. 599 not amount to four feet; a small quantity in a side of three-and- twenty miles. I shall, however, use 120557,7, because I think it the most accurate determination. No. of triangles, Spheri- Angles corrected) _. cal Error. | for calculation. | Distances. excess, Observed angles. Names of stations. ° 7) ] ° DA fh Meet xxx1t1.|White Horse Hill | 38 43 Tapes —0,67 38 48 12,5 Nuffield - = | 86 4 16,25|—1,21 86 4 15 2) Mane Pb) | 2,6 |+0,4 White Horse Hill - - |146603,2 Numeldy| b= >= 9208555 XxXxIV. {Brill - - 5° 14 44,5 |—1,18 50 14 45 White Horse Hill | 64 45 43.75|—1,34 64 45 42,5 Stow on the Wold | 64 59 32 |—1,35 6459 45 180 0 0,25 3,88 |—3,63 f White Horse Hill - - |124365,6 c Stow from { Mais a $ - 146326,3 « 32 34 43 |—0.41 60 56 6,25 |—0,64 xxxv. {Brill - - 32) AA zs25 60 56 5,5 86 29 12,25 2537 1+0,38 . Stowsvad-i wee :2slsrie oi 78938,2 Epwell from ) 23) a J = 128140 xxxvi. |Epwell - - 38 10 44 |—0,25 . 38 10 42,75 | Stow a;-;. |- 72 38 49,5 |—9,34 72 38 47,5 Broadway Beacon | 69 10 31,75|—0,32 69 10 29,75 180 O 5,25 if 0,92 +4533 Broadway Beacon from £ pill RAR peeree 4H 2 Goo The Account of a — No. of : Observed Spheri- Angles corrected| —_ triangles, | Names of stations. angles. ‘ cal -for-calculation, | Distances. excess. —— ee aw A oO. pue Feet. xxxXV11.|Broadway Beacon | 56 32 45 56 32 44,75 Epwell —- 95 34 25525 95 34 24575 Corley = = | 27 52 49,75 27 52 50,5 180 0 Oo 1,58|—1,58 Corley from Broadway Beacon - - = |171568 xxxv1it.[Brill - - 34.23 5855 |—-O,05 34 23 5795 Epwell - 85 0 18,5 |—1,10 a5 “orryes Arbury Hill - 60 35.4535 |—0,70)-> 60.35 $755 180 0 2,5 2,46 |—0,04 : Epwell - 83098,4 Arbury Hill from Ball i it 140530 89 57 535 54 45 18,25 35 17 36,25 xxxix.{Arbury Hill - | 89 57 4,5 Epwell == 54 45 18,75 |—0.57 Corley - 35 17 36,75 |—0.57 2,29 Arbury Hill - 117463 Corley from { Epwell s - = /143827,8 By the triangle Broadway Beacon, Epwell, Corley, (see the above) the distance from Corley to Broadway Beacon is the only distance computed; and this has been obtained through the means of two observed angles only. When the observations were made at Broadway Beacon, it was not imagined Corley could be seen; and the contrary was not known till the party arrived at the latter place. In so large a triangle, it would certainly be right to observe all the angles: but I-have given the angles as they now stand, because the distance from Epwell to Corley comes out 143831 feet, which determination differs only three feet from the same distance found by the last triangle. i A ES x. |Bow Brickhill - | 68 22 56,75|—1,21 ~ | 68 227%q Arbury Hill - 43 16 55,5 |—0,99 43 16 54,5 Brill - ° 68 20 7,75|—1,22 68 20 6,5 180 0 oO 3243 1-343 Arbury Hill - - {146481 Bow Brickhill from { Boll: - — 1108058,9 Trigonometrical Survey. 601 It will now be expedient to compute the distance from Bow Brick- hill to Brill, by means of another set of triangles. And it was for the express purpose of verifying this distance found by the last triangle, that Scutchamfly Barrow, in Berkshire, and the station above Wendover, were chosen. The base on which these triangles are to rest, is the distance between Nuffield and White Horse Hill, VIZ. 120557,7 feet. No. of ; Observed } Spheri- Angles corrected] _. triangles Names of stations. angles. Diff. cal Error. } for calculation. | Distances. excess, OM t 7] r) “ r o 8 ) Feet. xu1. |Nuffield > - | 62 32 5425 |—0,53 62°32 6 White Horse Hill 35 34 23.25 —0,47 35 34 24 Shotover Hill - 81 53 29:75 —0,74 81 53 30 179 59 58,25| 1575|—3>5 White Horse Hill - 108050,2 Shotover Hill from { Nuffield i f 7084251 xLit. |Shotover Hill - z0° S48 —~0,12 20) o8 White Horse Hill 42 4/'2 |—0,04 A2: Abe 2 Scutchamfly Barrow |111 47 50 |—0o,70 Ill 47 50 180 0 Oo | | 0,86 }|—0,86 White Horse Hill = - 51261,9 Scutchamfly Barrow from Shotover Gill 2 - 77968;3 xL111,|Shotover Hill - {117 30 56 |—1,41 117 30 55,25 Scutchamfly Barrow {| 34 26 52 |—o,o1 34 26 52 Wendover - 28 2 12,75 |—0,09 28 2,412,798 4180 0 0,75 | 1,52 |—0,77 Scutchamfly Barrow = |147113,3 Wendover from { SiStover : i 93828,6 602 The Account of a Angles corrected for calculation. Observed angles. Distances. / " 7] Pe 7) Feet. XLIV.|Wendover - 23123 57,5 23 23 57,25 Shotover Hill - 48 30 39,75 48 30 40,5 A Wendover - - 1739493 Beil tem { Shotover Hill 39200,2 xLv. |Wendover - 80 11 9,25 Brill - - BEAR Tint Bow Brickhill - | 42 23 50,75 80 11 8,5 5.25. 237-9 e235 575 180 O 1,51 1,58 |—0,07 Rieter } Wendover - “ 92400,7 Bow Brickhill from { Brill t Di 108055 According to the first determination, the distance from Bow Brickhill to Brill is 108058,9 feet, and by the last, 108855 feet. There is, therefore, a difference of 4 feet nearly ; a quan- tity which must be deemed inconsiderable ; hence, 108056,9 feet may be taken for the true distance. xLvi.{Kinsworth - 62 55. 38375 62° ik 5* 2855 Bow Brickhill - 88 42 0 88 4I 59,25 Brill - = 2 hear 28 22 22,25 —_- |§ ———— | — | ——__—_ caste Brill - - 121322, LSS OED Teh { Bow'Brickhill: “20 ©.) Rae xivi1|Wendover - 33 26 48 33 26 49 Quainton - = - | 94 58 37 94 58 38 | Brill: Ga - - 51 34 33 51 34 33 179 59 58 0355 |—2555 Brill - - pele Quainton from { Wendover E 2 58146,4 Trigonometrical Survey. 603 Angles eorrected for calculation, Error. Distances. No. of ' Angles -, | Spheri- triangles} . observed, eae cal : excess. ee | ee oe ° , v7) 7] “ o 1 7] Feet. xLvizi|Bow Brickhill - 38 51 40,75 38 51 40,75 - = | 46 44 2955 46 44 29,25 Ot 23-50225 Dine 180 0 1,25 0,83 |+0,42 c Wendover - - 58146,9 pois { Bow Brickhill - 6749153 In the above triangle, I have computed the distances of Wendover and Bow Brickhill from Quainton with 92400,7 feet, the side Wendover and Bow Brickhill, as determined in a former triangle? xL1x.|Bow Brickhill - 85 9 5275 Siva, Qasiz Kinsworth - ges UGE eal 52 17 56 Quainton - = IC eh ie, 8 42 32 12 5 Kinsworth - a 84997 Quainton from Bow Brickhill - 67490,3 Therefore, 67490 may be considered as nearly the true distance, in feet, between Quainton and Bow Brickhill. L. {Bow Brickhill - | 42 10 36,75 AZ 1040.5 Kinsworth —_ - 82 50 30,5: 82 50 30 Lillyhoe = = = | 54 38 53 54 38 53,5 180 O 0,25 1,26 |—1,50 : Kinsworth = 47278,7 Lallyboe irom { Bow Brickhill = [69867 s As the stations Lidlington, Trusler Hill, together with Crouch Hill, Cumner Hill, and Whiteham Hill, have been used for purposes of greater importance than secondary ones have been generally applied to, I shall insert the triangles formed by their intersections in this article. 604, The Account of a No. of 5 Ob d ; siianigled Names of stations. ate Diff. pine ea Distances. 1 7) “ Feet. Li. |Kinsworth - 7 45 re Bow Brickhill - | 80 39 37,25 Lidlington - 68 16 22,25 180 0 4,5 0,42 |+4,92 zy. Bow Brickhill —- 32035,6 Lidlington from te chee ‘i 6125543 Li. |Lillyhoe - + | 78 58 26 78 58 26 Kinsworth - 51 46 22 51 46 22 Lidlington - adh, 2 . 49 15 12 . Kinsworth - - 47280 Lillyhoe from Lidlington 2 49025 The distance from Lillyhoe to Kinsworth, as found in a former triangle, is 47278,1 feet, and by the last 47280 feet ; therefore, 47279,3 may be taken for the true distance in feet. Litt. [Bow Brickhill - 38 28 56. 38 28 56 Lillyhoe - - | 23 59 31 23 59 31 Lidlington - a) den 117 31/33 oi Lidlington - - 4902753 cynoe mom 4 Bow Brickhill é 69869 And this triangle, with that preceding it, gives the mean distance between Lillyhoe and Lidlington = 49026,1 feet; and, with the triangle Lillyhoe, Kinsworth, and Bow Brickhill, it assigns 69868 feet for the mean distance between Lillyhoe and Bow Brickhill. Liv. {Lillyhoe - - 5 52 I15 5 52 11,5 Bow Brickhill - TA 54 4.2575 14 54 42575 Trusler Hill cS Oi Mab ips a tt 159 13 5575 Teele Aron Bow Brickhill - | 209g8}7 Lillyhoe - - 5067 3,6 Trigonometrical Survey. 6os eNoiGE) Mame oftaions, | Omerwed | pig / Seber] so, Andis cas ance. | €XCess. ; : J , Feet. Liv. |Crouch Hill = 145 23 26,25 4 J : 14s 23 26 ' {Epwell - - 27 93. 10 27. 3:10 Brill - - Sipe “keen Sich 7 33 24 , Brill iS si 102608 Crouch Hill from{ Epwell : Yi 29668,8 -Distance from White Horse Hill to Shotover Hill 108050,2 feet. tv. |Shotover Hill - 48 5 32,75 48 § 32,25) White Horse - 16 59 5375 16 59 $3525 |Whiteham Hill - |114 54 34,75 114A 54 3455 180 O 15325 ; : White Horse Hill - 88662,2 Whitcham Hill from{ Mie Sh pt c He'd tvi. |Whiteham Hill + | 55 52 35 55 52 36 Shotover Hill - 24 37 36 ZAG Br a7 Cumner Hill - 99 29 48,5 rae 99 29 47 179 59 $995 ‘ Shotover Hill 2 - 29231, Cumner Hill from { Whiteham Hill - Rie pe And, because the Observatory of his Grace the Duke of Mart- BorouGH, at Blenheim, together with that at Oxford, have been observed with the same care and attention as the principal stations, and also because precise determinations of the situations are of great importance, I shall here insert the triangles formed by their intersections. . MDCCC. 41 606 The Account of a No. of Observed Spheri- Angles corrected triangles Names of stations. angles. Diff cal . | for calculation, | Distances. : | excess. sees ‘ ©. el a a 7] u CT ae Feet. Lvii. |Shotover Hill - - | 23 11 5 24°. @ Cumner Hill - - | 29 23 33 1 29 27°93 The Atlas on the top 12) 25 22 ‘of the Observatory at Oxford Cumner Hill - - | 14492 Oxford Observatory from 4 cyotover Hill - e 8665.1 Lvi11.|Whiteham Hill - [131 25 36,5 13% 25 35395 White Horse Hill - | 10 30 43,5 10 30 43575 Blenheim Observatory . 38 3.40575 : White Horse Hill - 107831,9 Blenheim Observatory from { Whiteham Hill - - | 26237,6 ART. XIV. Triangles for connecting the Series carried on from Scut- chamfly Barrow and White Horse Hill, in Berkshire, into Bucking- hamshire and Bedfordshire, with the Series carried on for the Survey of Essex. The angle at St. Ann’s Hill, between the station on Hanger Hill Tower and Hampton Poor House, inferred from General Roy’s Account, is 25° 33’ 58,5. In 1799, the angle between the staff on Pen Church Tower and Hampton Poor House was taken, and found = 95° 57’ 34,5; therefore, the angle between Pen Tower and Hanger Hill is 70° 29’ 36”. The distance from St. Ann’s Hill to Pen is determined i a" «. we Trigonometrical Survey. 607 * the following triangle, in which the distance between St. Ann’s Hill and Bagshot Heath, viz. 46955,3 feet, (see Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. 496,) is used for the base. Angles corrected Observed * al ‘| Error. | for calculation. | Distances. No. of . triangles} Names of stations. angles, Fect. Lix. {St, Ann’s Hill 80 43 48 80 43 48 Bagshot - = | 70 30 37 70 30 37 Pen Tower - BT gst ats 28 45 35 St. Ann’s Hill - © | gz000,5 Seto co Bagshot Heath - - 96318 _ The distance from St. Ann’s Hill to Hanger Hill Tower is 68895,8 feet: this is derived from the mean length of the base on Hounslow Heath. This side, together with St. Ann’s Hill and Pen, using the included angle at St. Ann’s Hill, as found above, give 94640,5 feet, for the distance between Pen and Hanger Hill Towers. The angle at St. Ann’s Hill, between Bagshot Heath and Hanger Hill Tower, is 151° 7' 24",25: this, with the sides Bagshot Heath and. St. Ann’s, St. Ann’s and Hanger Hill, give 17° 13’ 48”, for the angle at Bagshot Heath, between Hanger Hill Tower and St. Ann’s Hill: hence we have the following triangle. Bagshot Heath - - 16° 45' 43” Hanger Hill - - 103 18 23 Stanmore - - BQ 5 5A le | 608 The Account of a Which triangle gives 37431 feet, for the distance between Stan- more and Hanger Hill Tower. The angle at the station on Bow Brickhill, (see the ocd article,) between Wendover and Kinsworth, is 46° 18’ 8”,5; and the distances from it to these stations are 92402,2 feet, . and §7668 feet respectively: these give the following triangle. Bow Brickhill ts AG. 13° 8 oe Wendover - - 38 25 21,25 Kinsworth - - 95 16 30,25 From which the distance between Wendover and Kinsworth is found = 67090,7 feet. The observed angle at Wendover, between Bow Brickhill and Stanmore, is 102° 29” 99”; from which, subtracting 98° 25’ 21,25, the angle between Bow Brick- hill and Kinsworth, we get 63° 57' 7,75, for the angle between Kinsworth and Stanmore. Again, the observed angle at Kins- worth, between Bow Brickhill and Stanmore, is 173° 37 44)"; from which, subtracting the angle between Bow Brickhill and Wendover, we get 78° 21’ 19”,75, for the angle between Stan- more and Wendover. If these computed angles are actually such as might be observed, were Kinsworth and Wendover visible from each other, the angle at Stanmore between those stations ought to be 97° 41’ 39”, nearly: but the observed angle was 37° 41’ 41”,75; which is so nearly the computed one, as to leave little doubt of the accuracy of those data from which the angles are derived. The distance from Wendover to Kinsworth is 67090,7 feet. Wendover = 63 57 7075 Kinsworth - 78 21 13,75 | which, corrected for calcula- Stanmore - - 37 41 41,75{ tion, becomes, 180 0 3,25} Trigonometrical Survey. 6og Wendover - 63 37 > Kinsworth - 78 21 12 Stanmore - 37 41 4A which triangle gives Wendover = 1074641 foet. Kinsworth = 98577,5 In consequence of Bushy Heath intercepting the view towards the east from Stanmore, it became necessary to choose a station on the former. ‘To determine the distance, the angles at the two stations were taken very accurately; they were as follows, the distance of Stanmore from{ Stanmore - 42 11 21,5 Bushy Heath 135 35 40,5 Kinsworth, : . . which gives 5489, feet for the required distance. To determine the distance of the station on Pen Church Tower, we have two angles in the following triangle, viz. Wendover - 38 13 18 pt corrected for calcula- Stanmore - 23 44 48 tion, becomes, Pen Tower - 118 1 54 Wendover - 38 13 18,25 Stanmore - 23 44 48,25 Pen Tower - 118 1 54,5 which triangle gives the distance of Pen from Canmore, me leet tanmore == 75325,4 With this distance of Stanmore from Pen, found from the last triangle, and also that between Stanmore and Hanger Hill, derived from the triangle, Bagshot Heath, Hanger Hill, and Stanmore, together with the included angle at Stanmore, viz. ‘109’ 28’ 29”,5, we get the distance of Pen to Hanger Hill Tower = 9461.8 feet. The same distance has been found -before, in a shorter and more direct way, being 9464.0,5 feet : the difference is only 8,7 feet; a sufficient proof that the distances given for the survey of this intricate and woody country, are G10 The Account of a sufficiently correct. It will be more convenient to show how these triangles are connected with those to the eastward, when I arrive at that part of the work which treats of the survey of Essex, than at present. I shall, therefore, proceed to the fol- lowing article, after observing, that by the help of Harrow Spire, (the situation of which has been determined by General Roy,) and by observations hereafter to be made with the small instru- ment on Pen Tower, less difficulty will occur in rt interior survey than was at first expected. ART. xv, Triangles formed by the intersections of Churches, Windmills, and other Objects. Triangles, Angles Distances of the Stations from the observed. intersected Objects. ee ee a ene erm ce } Feet. Little Haldon - - 23 54 so [} 18974 Ball’s Obelisk - - - {132 41 } Great wie Li L] 19366 Great Haldon, secondary station Great Haldon from Ball’s Obelisk 19366 feet. _ Great Haldon - - . 68 0 35 Ball’s Obelisk = - Fl 32°30 Topsham Steeple 28316 } Topsham Steeple - { 27679 Little Haldon from Furland 72776 feet. Little Haldon - - 18.2.2 > 37656 Furland - - 18 42 53 }Hop pe ee q 39028 Hope’s Nose; secondary station Bodmin from Trevose 81967,6 feet. Bodmin - - 15 48 43 : eae "Treveee t eg % {21 28 36 St. Minvern Steeple —s_ 36806 St. Minvern Steeple Bodmin > 12 pe Minvern Windmill {| 34852 Trevose - - 3 Hn 48478 St. Minvern Windmill Trigonometrical Survey. 611° Trevose from Cadon Barrow 85624,8 feet. Triangles, : Angles Distances of the stations from the observed. intersected objects» ee ee ee [ ceiemeneneaetmemael T te} 3 W ' 56 revose Cre - - 55 3 59 i 4 292 Cadon Barrow - = 19 15 48 bse. Isey Steeple { 73216 St. Isey Steeple Trevose - - 58 41 39 Shaye 10894 Cadon Barrow - - 6 38 22 }st. MA eset oa { 80504 St. Merian Steeple Black Down from St. Stephen’s 62506,7 feet. Black Down - - 4 46-37— “ 61289 St. Stephen’s Down” - - 74, 20 14 } Werrington Ss ily 5301 Werrington Steeple Black Down - - 15 18 49 69897 St. Stephen’s - - 104 53 9 } Boyton oe % { sauce Boyton Steeple Black Down - & Tus ae ; 60448 St. Stephen’s re Pewee se Stephen’s Steeple { 2395 St. Stephen’s Steeple Black Down - - OK O18) . 77698 St. Stephen’s - i 153 13 23 } North Petherwin Steeple { abhno North Petherwin Steeple Carraton from St. Stephen’s 52994 feet. Carraton siles - 50 40 15 : : | 32886 St. Stephen’s 4 38 21 4 }stokeclimsland Steeple { pet Stokeclimsland Steeple Carraton ss - - Gime \7 St. Stephen’s - - 55 32 16 Launceston Steeple } Launceston Steeple { cee Carraton - - - | § 58 26 St. Stephen’s = - - - 53.4 70a5 } Launceston Chapel = { 49404 Launceston Chapel 6427 Long Knoll from Westbury 58118,2 feet. SSeS L 5g BPR oot aia one one 7 Die } Frome Steeple - { 33765 Westbury ~ - - - | 34 53 50 Frome Steeple . 41793 612 The Account of a = ew +. om, Lansdown from Farley Down 28730,4 feet. Triangles. Angles Distances of the stations from the o observed. IDkeréeCEed ODJCCLs. ane eee Lansd 6 43 16 ibe ansdown - ° 56 43 1 ‘ 13563 Farley Down iid 3 =P 28) i2iae } Cold Aston { 24120 Cold Aston Moor Lynch from Dundon 32688,8 feet. Moor Lynch - - 15 54 56 : i 20406 Bondo iy ” 23-19 6 Walton Windmill — - { 14213" Walton Windmill ; Moor Lynch ~ - £22 0O AU1 } 17688 Duties ? 19-18 55 Westonzoyland Steeple 44848 Westonzoyland Steeple Moor Lynch - - =) Note 5 96 : 15691 | Bunce i i “8 a -260 Middlezoy Steeple - { a 36530 Middlezcy Steeple ‘ Moor Lynch - - - 153 53.50 } 4 { 19454 Banden 4 - it 939 13 Chedzoy Steeple 29556 Chedzoy Steeple Moor Lynch - - 29 20 18 } : ne 24457 Dances ‘ R y U6 God: Highham Windmill 16618 Highbam Windmill Moor Lynch - - 36 25 56 } : : { 21567 Dundon 4 Fi 3 - | 39 51 57. Highham Steeple : 19982 Highbam Steeple Moor Lynch - - 147 57 0 } . . - { 33656 Dundon 5 y ~ | 16 15 14 Bridgewater Spire 63768 Bridgewater Spire i ee eee Moor Lynch - - 69 52 39 } : { 40063 Dupdeeeee rey ‘ 63 18 59 Burton Present Obelisk 42101 Burton Pynsent Obelisk } ee ere Moor Lynch - - IZ 12 41 } ‘ { 40792 Dundon - * - -}129 45 57 Somerton Steeple a Wa ee ee Somerton Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. Dundry from Lansdown 55248,9 fect. 613 Angles Triangles. Distances of the stations from the observed. intersected objects. : aay Feet. Dundry~- - - i a 16 54757 Pease se r z 8s 25\ 0 } Puckle Church Steeple 21819 Puckle Church Steeple Dundry - - = 30 37 18 : ft { 61842 ~ Lansdown - - - | 86 18 39 } westleigh ohegute 31566 Westleigh Steeple : ; Dundry - - - Cb a) C0) ih { 21920 Gasca re _ 22 23 ; | } Bristol Cathedral 44935 Bristol Cathedral Dundry~ - - - 44 18 9g - " { 22096 ee ae 2 - | 21 a2 24 | Redclift Steeple 42346 Redcliff Steeple Dundry pte aie - | 78 18 2 a ’ 13883 Reason il 4 - 14 32 } Long Aston Steeple 54168 Long Aston Steeple Dundry - - = OZ 33h Gk 5 : : 12860 is ell Pa aA [Ep Clitden Windmill” ~~ { | 2008" Clifden Windmill Dundry : = Seehpay 5 ign Jey 38391 Sousa 4, " 39.7 35 } Blaze Castle - { 58032 Blaze Castle Dundry - - - 89 10 18 35391 BLAS z f - | 32 52 56 }Penpole Park Gazebo { aes Penpole Park Gazebo Dundry a 32, LOb 3 , . 32391 pei & 5 31 49 52 }st. George’s Steeple - { au7oy St. George’s Siecble - Dundry = - ~ 4454 50 . , . 1168 Lapilown : : 48 5 4 | Duke of Beaufort’s House { Eaaat Duke of Beaufort’s House, Stoke | House; Stoke Dundry - - - 57°15) 32 35182 Incbaa. , - | 39 14 57 } Marfeld Steeple - { aire Harfield Steeple MDCCC. 4K 614 The Account of a Distances of the Stations from the intersected Objects. Triangles. o pha Feet. Dundry , - -- 13 58 bab ‘e 66541 Lansdown - = =, 1kz0. Obs Daskpaevieenr . 18573 Durham Steeple Dundry~- - - f | 56512 Tansdowa a 7. z } Knowle Steeple - { ; ited Knowle Steeple Dundry - - ~ 29 42 10 47845 Lansdown dn a ~ 459-59 447 }Mangotsfield Steeple - { 27376 Mangotsfield Steeple Dundry - - - 46 12 31 : 55045 Tansdown i i 166 38 49 }Winterbourn Steeple - { 43280 Winterbourn Steeple Mendip from Dundry 69196 feet. Dundry - - - 15 0 54 : . 76847 Meidip |. ¥ a 104 10 15 \ Leigh Steeple on Mendip 20533 Leigh Steeple on Mendip ¥ Dundry - - ° go 22 22 {| 1417 Mendip - - - | 1 10 22 } Dundry ag a | 69221 Dundry Steeple - Mendip from Long Knoll 61962,3 feet, Long Knoll - - 7-20-24 : : {| 49286 Mendip ¥ 2 2 25 42 22 }Doulting Spire { 14517 Doulting Spire Farley Down from Westbury 59849,5 feet, Westbury - - - “81 25 20 . 51197 Farley Down - > a ager ee }Devizes Steeple - { odaee Devizes Steeple ' Whitehorse from Scutchamfly 51261,9 feet. Whitehorse - - - 32 55 51 : : 72898 Scutchamfly =. hier eines) (9 27 Abingdon Spire ¥ { 40852 Abingdon Spire Trigonometrical Survey. 615 Triangles. Angles Distances of the Stations from the observed. intersected Objects. ONG Feet. Whitehorse - - - | 10 39 30 101693 Scutchamfly - r 158 52 26 } Wallingford Steeple - { 52185 Walling ford Steeple Whitehorse - - - Scutchamfly = oe if #a 8 | bGreat Coxwell Windmill { hee Great Ch cwell Windmill 21 71834 Whitehorse - ne Cos mare e 38449 Scutchamfly : fe ah ot ‘6 } Highworth Steeple = - { 87355 Highworth Steeple Whitehorse > - —f 28-699 63991 Scutchamfly = B ye 99 45 45 }Drayton Steeple - { 40586 Drayton Steeple Whitehorse - - - 348-57 81618 Scutchamfly ieee r., IECG.233,.80 }Radley SuENe = { 48624 Radley Steeple Whitehorse - - - Fis 7 118 Sculichamély j & . ia a BS } Buckland ye - { pai Buckland Steeple : Whitehorse - - - : 22 Scutchamfly - - - - } Witney ERG ( dhe Witney Steeple . Whitehorse - - - 9° 57 40 8992 Scutchamfly - 4 g | 48 27 50 } Bampton Steeple - : anne Bampton Steeple Whiteham from Brill 62066,1 feet. Whiteham - - - 19 47 } : 28983 es ee — tp 40 Islip Steeple - n { ee Islip Steeple Whiteham - - - 78 47 27956 Brill Z k - Gees 33 Woodjtock Steeple - { 64725 Woodstock Steeple Whiteham - - - 38 39 25 = : 24677 Brill 1 ‘i x e 18 59 22 Kidlington Spire { 47373 Kidlington Spire 4 Ka 616 The Account of a Whitehorse from Brill 146603,2 feet, Triangles. Angles Distances of the Stations from the observed. intersected Objects, i a Feet. a 2 i 9 i is sos v5 } Witchwood Forest Beacon { ace Witchwood Forest pond Broadway from Epwell 80611,4 feet. Broadway - - - 46 51 21 : . 109337 Epwell J i . 85 48 34 } Warwick Steeple + { 79992 Warwick Steeple Broadway - - - 49 43 19 524 158205 Epwell - a5 . 1600-10-49 st. Martin’s, Coventry - { 122627 St. Martin’s Spire, Cory Broadway - - : 71 52 32 Epwell - - . == 174-5355 Soleybull Spire Corley - - - - | 10 17 47 } ae ee { 70621 Arbury - a 18 145 Dun Church Windmill 44249 Dun Church Windmill. Corley - - - - |107 11 { 106471 Arbury - : 34 20 2 2 | } Gazebo on Bardon Hill 180344 Gazebo on Burdon Hill, Leices- tersbire Corley - - - - 100 41 54 } ; ; e { 103373 Arbury Ls “ - | 36 37 26 Markfield Windmill me ; Markfield Windmill Coney oe aay or ren a wioaer ote } Newnham Windmill ~ - { 118771 Arbury : - 101 33 35 5845 Newnham REDD J Corley from Broadway 171570 feet. Breen - were r ga" 2A } Building on Breadon Hill, ye oe Corley = - "14 33 '9 | | 182682 Building on Breadon Hill Trigonometrical Survey. 617 Epwell from Crouch Hill 29668,8 fect, Distances of the Stations from the intersected Objects. Triangles. Angles observed. ee es eee | | ee ee +. OS mig | Feet Epwell - - - - 24 43 28 } . - 47493 See rel .. if ~ }r2q- 8 31 Deddington Steeple Weaade Deddington Steeple Epwell - - - = 22°. 2057 2 : { 31887 Crouch Hill - - - 89 27 20 } Bloxham ee 11971 Bloxham Spire Epwell - - = <1, D2 4.0 go } ayy { | 60070 Crouch Hill - - - 1ig5-28-44 eee joieeple L | 31802 Aynoe Steeple Epwell - - - 1Z, 45 23 3 y 43823 Crouch Hill - - = ft43 29°30 Adderbury Spine 16265 Adderbury Spire Epwell - - - 9:33 429 ; 64520 Crouch Hill - - 162 29 20 Harthingo'stceple 35005 Farthingo Steeple Epwell from Arbury Hill 83098,4 feet. Epwell - - - 27 30 20235 Arbury Hill 3 8 9 42 a Rand House, Edge Hills { 65816 Round House, Edge Hills Epwell - - = - 150 9 8 Belg 122636: Arbury Hill - z r 87 15 6 }se. Martin’s, Coventry { 94262 St. Martin’s, Coventry é Epwell - - - - | 28 31 46 SPaaieae 18576 Rey Fill . Sl 6 }Round House Windmill { 67364 Round House Windmill, Ede ‘ Hills Brill from Quainton 40908,6 feet. Brill - - - - 19 36 52 7 Quainton - b “ a 140-7 a \wingrove Steeple - { aad Wingrove Steeple Brill - = -- - 16 25 48 ne Quainton & - |128 12 5 | Hardwick Steeple - { a Hardwick Steeple 618 The Account of a Triangles. Angles Distances of the Stations from the observed. intersected Objects. Bail 2 me i Feet ri r c = 16 42 12 8710. : Quatifon | 4 . : 4 24 16 Luggersal Steeple - 32664 Luggersal Steeple Brill - - - - 8 30 43 Quainton - - |144 20 22 Granborough Steeple Granborough Steeple - f Brill - - - - 105 7 30 ‘ 2122 Quainton 4 Ps ‘j wT aa On FS Bicester Steeple ‘agi Bicester Steeple ae ALD Oar RIN ~ | 17 37 3? | (House at Wooton 14793 Quainton = - Q) 28.57, a 27181 Centre of the xen House at Wooton Stow from Broadway 52203,2 feet. Stow - Broadway > 3 a Sarsden Chapel Stow = une - ‘| 56 10 42 : Broadway 2 . - | 49 34.47 ‘ Walford Spire - j Walford Spire Stow - - If 3 44 32926 Broadway - 21 32 40 \ Bourton Chars A ; 21786 Bourton Chapel Stow from Epwell 78938,2 feet. Stow - - rseergmes| | ro 30 20 9876 Epwell - i 6 37 9 1 stow on the Wold - } 74573 Stow on the Wold Steeple Wendover from Brill 92400,7 feet. aa ‘ a os ae eee t Pitehcot Windmill - { 53739 Wendover - - - 46137 | 4. 5ogo1 Pitchcot Windmill Trigonometrical Survey. 619 Triangles. | Angles Distances of the Stations from the observed, intersected Objects, ll ° ‘ a Fest Bri - - - 24. Kea m2 : : 99003 Wendover - - - “NIL 33 40, }winghoe SEC | L| 43577 Ivinghoe Spire | _ if tne “766 36 4) \padbury Steeple - Wisi Wendover - 46 32 33 y P g2401 Padbury Steeple (doubtful) 1 ee ROO ERY ae | 39009 oaoual: | - fi a a 1 48 } Quainton Steeple - { 55056 Quainton Steeple Wendover from Quainton 72889,4 feet. Wendover - - - 34. 46 37 . 63 { 52487 Quainton - - - 45 9 20 NvangpStceple 42230 Wing Steeple Wendover Fa then = 44 58 11 : : : 66472 Quainton - : -\6r-- ato: }crindon Windmill - { 5 3026 Crindon Windmill Quainton from Bow Brickhill 67490,6 feet. Quainton - = - 75 15 34 58876 Bow Brickhill 4 - | 47 19 Southern Obelisk - 77449 Southern Obelisk, Stow Park, Bucks Quainton > - 75 4 46 3 61881 Northern Obelisk, Stow Park Wendover from Kinsworth 84462 feet. Kinsworth - - - 69 56 52 Wendover - - | 31 6 26 Leighton Buzzard - { 35317 Leighton Bucart Spire. 64215, Kinsworth from Quainton 84996,3 feet. Kinsworth 2 - ae fey dae f-| 70886 Opaintod | - i =; bgte 9514 daylesbury Steeple - { 27879 Aylesbury Steeple 620 The Account of a Bow Brickhill from Lidlington 32035,6 feet. Triangles, Angles observed, Bow Brickhill = + - - 57 43 21 21 Lidlington - - 65 40 39 North Crawley pire Bow Brickhill - - - 45 8 47 Lidlington - - - + -[I12-13 11 Pavenbam Spire Bow Brickhill - - - 24. 15 25 Lidlington = - - 137 19 21 St. Paul’s Spire, Beare Bow Brickhill - - 48 2 42 Lidlington - - = 111, 8 0g Sharnbrook Spire i Bow Brickhill - - - 38 42 47 Lidlington - = 19 39 20 Woburn Market Bout Distances of the Stations from the intersected Objects. Feet. }wvorth Crawley Spire - { Lege! } Pavenham Spire - { his. S , 68727 }se. Paul’s, Bedford - peta } sharnbrook Spire - { | aa | Woburn Market House ( pest Bow Brickhill - - - Rigas oe ; / { Lidlington i e i 10 6 1 | p Ridgemont Station Ridgemont Station Bow Brickhill - - - 25. §1|\29 } : y { 46959 Lidlington - - - 116 31/15 Rigo tor aie 22889 Wootton Spire Bow Brickhill - - - 36 40 14 2 { 29599 Lidlington = - - - 64 51 26 } Cranfield Spas - 19526 Cranfield Spire Lillyhoe from Lidlington 49026,1 feet. Lillyhoe - - See 3. ATT 25 Lidlington - . - - 3 2.16 Pollux Hill Spire Lillyhce ° - - 234031123 Lidlington - - - {11g 15 11 Bow Brickhill Steeple Lillyhoe - - : Lidling'on ~ - Colmworth Spire 49°54 3 - |100° 30 33 } Pollux Hill Spire race 70224 } Bow Brickhill Steeple { 31738 . d 97617 }colmworth Spire { 759044 Trigonometrical Survey. 621 Wrest Garden Obelisk Lillyhoe + - - 63 39 11 Lidlington - - -| 88 31 51 St. Neot’s Steeple Triangles. ; Angles Distances of the stations from the observed. intersected objects. Oat We Feet, Lillyhoe - - - 23.97 30 : ch 25599 Lidlington = - - -| 22 4 36 i aed % 27658 Silsoe Spire Lillyhoe - - a 11 46 23 : 30008 Lidlington - - -| 17 18 29 ; a ; 20580 Flitton Steeple Lillyhoe = - St ee ai 57 56 38 i 16857 Lidingran ‘ a ae et Shillington Steeple 4ekag Shillington Steeple ; Lillyhoe - - - 14 35 24 : 32242 Lidlington = - - - | 24 29 56 Eom, ie Shea ps Oe 19586 Westoning Steeple Lillyhoe - - - 23 40 47 4 . 23770 Lidlington : n | 19 18 12 Wrest Garden Obelisk 8880 St. Neot’s Steeple - Kinsworth from Lidlington 61255,3 feet. Kinsworth = ie oa ey, oo : : 666 Lidlington eye 23 a ; \ Hartington Steeple = ; 37 Harlington Steeple Kinsworth - - - | 17 22 11 Lidlington - - oy a 3 Maulden Steeple oF i Maulden Steeple - } 63165 Kinsworth = - or -| 3532 a te Gave Lidlington e iz 73 16 4 * illbrook Steeple - } 7 Millbrook Steeple , Kinsworth = - - - 36 15 30 Lidlington - = = pm ME 5) 1 streatly Steeple - { 36167 Streatly Steeple “ Kinsworth = 2 3 34 29 11 “ ' ae Lidlington - « ame 166 a Py + Hanslop Spire = } Bare 3 Hanslop Spire MDCCC, 4 L 622 The Account of a Kinsworth from Bow Brickhill 57668 feet. Triangles. Angles Distances of the Stations from the - observed. intersected Objects. Bow Brickhill 1 31 2 pe ow Brickhi - - 131 31 Bo : ie 93229 Kinsworth - - ~ | 30 17 44 } Souldrope an { 138367 Souldrope Spire ; Bow Brickhill = - - QI 22 55 ane 31623 ee | ha " - | 28-24 oe } Sauldon Windmill - { 66434 Sauldon Windmill Bow Brickhill = - - 70 9 33 a 32706 Kinowortn) © 5 rs 33.27 4 }stewkley Windmill = - { 55812 Stewkley Windmill Bow Brickhill - - Kinsworth = iS a Tharfield Windmill Sie arfield Windmi 139157 93 36 13 } Tharfield Windmill - 123073 Bow Brickhill = - Kinsworth - - - Tottenhoe Station 4 13 44 Stati 2 . 43177 14.47 27 } Tottenhoe Station { 13049 Bow Brickhill - - te 55 14 }chalgrave Steeple - { 43590 Kinsworth - - mn Agi ee 23699 Chalgrave Steeple b Bow Brickhill - - 85 441.3 ways : ; 28814 Kanenneth Z rn - | 27 23 29 }Lidlington Windmill - { 62442 Lidlington Windmill - Bow Brickhill - : 116 46 10 : r 107275 Kinsworth - - siti senn 6 | A } Keysoe ae { 142850 Keysoe Spire Lillyhoe from Trusler Hill 50673,6 feet. a 118536 . ee . 3 4 " 6 2 Lillyhoe Lae bd ke } Knotting Green Elm Tree { 95981 Trusler Hill - - 103 29 55 Knotting Green Elm Tree Lillyhoe BHM - Trusler Hill = - Sundon Windmill 36 45 37 } - dune { 25692 27 4 Sundon Windmill 33799 - aad) eae ’ Trigonometrical Survey. 623 Bow Brickhill from Trusler Hill 20138,7 feet. Triangles, Angles Distances of the stations from the observed. intersected objects, * ° / I Bow Brickhill = - = LA Dy ts GA 15998 Trusler Hill - Sah res 5O 16 225i\. Srv teyratceple 3867 Crawley Steeple Bow Brickhill * - 93 18 15 } Moulshoe Steeple Hl { 25136 Trusler Hill - - - | 49 17 46 33101 Moulshoe Steeple Bow Brickhill es 1g 2707. s i { 12432 Trusler Hill - - - | 19 46 14 Woden sterle 8552 Woburn Steeple Bow Brickhill from Lillyhoe 69867 feet. Bow Brickhill - - 60 57 17 } Renlold Steeple i { 84608 Lillyhoe te - | 68 43 59 79373 Renbold Steeple Bow Brickhlll - - 64.55 32 85825 Lillyhoe = - - - | 66 41 24 }Ravensden Steeple - { 84640 Ravensden Steeple Kinsworth from Lillyhoe 47278,7 feet. Kinsworth . - - | 43 44 48 we fe 49849 Lillyhoe a i= 3 71 53 53 \ Plitwick Steeple = { 36264 Flitwick Steeple 624, The Account of a SECTION SECOND. Determination of the Latitudes and Longitudes of the Stations on Black Down, in Dorsetshire, Butterton, in Devonshire, and St. Agnes Beacon, in Cornwall. Art. xvi.—Calculation of the Distance between Black Down and Dunnose in the Isle of Wight. To complete this distance, I shall have recourse to the xxvith and xxviith triangles, published in the Philosophical Transac- tions of 1795, and uid and tivth of the Trans. for 1797, together with the observations made at Black Down, in the latter year. (See also Pl. XXX. Fig. 1.). The most eligible method of calculating with these ri seems to be that of first finding the cross-distance between Black Down and Dean Hill. To do this, we have the angle at Nine Barrow Down, between Black Down and Dean Hill, and the respective distances from the first to the latter stations, together with the newly observed angle between Dunnose and Nine Barrow Down; from which we obtain the angles of a tri- angle, constituted ny Dunnose, Nine Barrow Down, and Black Down. The distance from’ Nine Barrow Down to Dean Hill is 166497 feet, and, from the same station to Black Down, the dis- tance is 126782 feet, (see Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. 502, and for 1797, p. 455,) and the angle comprehended by those distances = 110° 30’ 13” ,25. The difference between the horizontal angle and that formed by the chords is 3",25, which, substracted from 110° go’ 19”,95, leaves 110° go’ 10”: computing with this Trigonometrical Survey. 625 angle and the sides spoken of, there results the following tri- angle, viz. Nine Barrow Down - |. 110° go’ 10” Black Down - - 40 6 54y75 Dean Hill -. - - 29 22 55,75 This, using the side Nine Barrow and Dean Hill, ( 166497 feet,) gives 24,0236,7 feet, for the distance between Black Down and Dean Hill. The angle at Dean Hill, between Nine Barrow Down and Dunnose, is 647° 50’ 19”, (see Phil. Trans. for 1795. p. §01,) and the angle between Black Down and Nine Barrow, as just found, is 29° 22’ 55",75, which, increased by the proper correction for the difference between the chord and horizontal angles, becomes, 29° 22’ 57,5. The sum of these angles ,94° 13’ 16”, 5, is the hori- zontal angle between Black Down and Dunnose. The angle at Black Down, between Dunnose and Nine Bar- row Down, deduced from observations made in 1797, is found to be 4° 30’ 25”,75: this, subtracted from the angle between Dean Hill and Dunnose, leaves 35° 36’ 29”, for the angle at Black Down; which, corrected for the purpose of reduction to their respective chord angles, become 94° 19’ 11”,5, and 35° 360’ 25",75, from whence we get the angle at Dunnose = 50° 10' 22,75. We have, therefore, the following triangle, viz. Dean Hill yi. =) igg? re" 4155! ‘Black Down - es 35, 36 25,75 Dunnose_ - bs ~ 50 10 29,75 The distance between Dean Hill and Dunnose is 1834,96,2: feet, (Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. 501,) and that between Black Down and Dean Hill, according to the foregoing computation, is 240236,7 feet : these, applied to the angles.of the above triangle. 6s) The Account of a give 314309,6, and 314305,4 feet, respectively, for the distance between Black Down and Dunnose: wherefore, the mean 314307,5 feet, = 59,528 miles, may be considered as the true distance between those stations. Direction of the Meridian at Black Down. On the 18th of April, in the forenoon, the angle between the Pole Star, when at its greatest apparent elongation from the meri- dian, was observed, and found to be - 104° 19’ 19,25 © And on the 1gth, in the afternoon - 98 42 47 Half their sum is the angle between the : meridian and Abbotsbury staff - == - 101 31 8 On the goth of April, in the forenoon, the angle between the Pole Star, when at its greatest apparent elongation from the meri- dian, was observed, and found to be - 104, 19 25,25 And on the 1gth, in the afternoon - 98 42 35,5 Half their sum is the angle between the meridian and Abbotsbury staff - - 101 31 0,5 Therefore, 101° 31’ 2” may be taken for the angle between the meridian and Abbotsbury staff. Art. xvil.—Latitude and Longitude of Black Down. The angle between Dunnose and the Abbotsbury Staff was observed, and found = 164° 26’ 3525; and the angle between the meridian and the same staff; by double azimuths of the Pole Star, 101° 31’ 2”. Wherefore their sum, subtracted from 360°, leaves g4° 2’ 22”,75, the angle which Dunnose makes _with the meridian. Lend Trigonometrical Survey. 627 In Fig. 4. Plate XXX. let Z be the zenith, B the station on Black Down, and ZBA its meridian; also, let D be Dunnose, and ZD its meridian; likewise, suppose BC to be an arc of a great circle, perpendicular to the meridian at B, and DA ano- ther arc of a great circle, perpendicular to the meridian at D, BF and ED being the parallels of latitude at Black Down and Dunnose. . In the spherical triangle BZD, the angles at B and D are given, the first being 94° 2’ 22”,75, and the second 84° 54/ 53”; therefore, in the triangle ABD the angle at B is 85° 57’ 36”,75, and, in the triangle BDC, the angle at D = 84° 54/ 53": hence, _ the angles of these triangles, when reduced to those formed by the chords, are as follows : DDC = 84 54! 52,5" In the triangle BDC {cpp SS Oar as 4.475 | DY a Aina 2 29. ABD = 85 57 36,75 And in the triangle ent BAD = 88 57 16,95 BDA= 5 5 7 Now the distance between Black Down and Dunnose, BD, has been already found to be 314307,5 feet; therefore, using the above angles with that distance, (after the proper corrections are applied for reducing the horizontal angles to those formed by the chords, ) we get, ; : BC = 313128 In the triangle BCD {ep conta sy ee | § ’ AD= 319581,2 ! | And in the triangle ABD { AB i S653 \ feet Again, in the two small triangles formed by the parallels BF and ED, the perpendiculars BC and DA, and the small arcs CF and AEF, we have the angles at C and A given, the 628 The Account of a first being 91° 2' 4.5”,75, and the last 88° 57'15"; which angles, however, are augmented by the addition of the differences be- tween the horizontal angles and those formed by the chords, We have therefore, . BCP = gi 245 In the triangle BCF { BEc =a 88 on 5855 FBC= 0.81 29.75 EAD = 88 57 17 7 And in the triangle AED ; AED = go 31 21,5 ADE = 0 381 21,5 And, using BC and AD, as found above, we get CF = 28509,1 And EA = aor 8} eet Therefore FD = DC + CF = 22146,9 + 2859,1 = 25006 feet. And BE=BA=EA= 27864,5 — 2859,8 = 25004,7 feet. The mean, 25005,3 feet, may be considered as very nearly the true distance between the parallels of Black Down and Dunnose. This method is the same as that made use of in the Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. 521, and affords the means of very accurately determining the distance between the parallels of latitude of the two stations, when the angles were observed with precision, and the direction in which the stations lie, is not much removed from east and west. This small space, 25004,7 feet, corresponds to 4/ 6”,5, in which I use 60851 fathoms for the length of a degree of the meridian in 50° 41’. See Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. 537- | ‘Now the latitude of Dunnose is 50° 37’ 7”,3, and its longitude 1°11/ 36”; (Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. 536;) therefore, 50° 37/73 + 4/ 6",5 = 50° 41’ 19,8, is the latitude of Black Down. This method of finding the latitude seems to be more correct _ than by spherical computation; yet, by this latter, nearly the’ Trigonometrical Survey. Gag same conclusion is derived; for, the bearing of Black Down west of Dunnose being 84° 54 52,5, we get the distance of that station from the meridian of the latter = 319072 feet, and from the perpendicular, 27861 feet ; which, converted into parts of an arch, according to the lengths of their respective degrees, gives 50° 41’ 14” for the latitude, and 1° 20’ 46”,4, for the longitude west of Dunnose. According to the troublesome yet ingenious method recommended by M. Sgyjour, in his Traité Analytique des Mouvemens apparens des Corps Célestes, the latitude of Black Down comes out 50° 41' 13,9, and the longi- tude 1° 20’ 45”,75. We may, therefore, admitting the supposi- tion of Dunnose being situated in 50° 37’ 7’’,3, safely take 50° 41’ 13,8 for the latitude, and 2° 32' 22”,4, for the longitude, of Black Down; that of Dunnose being 1° 11’ 36” west of the meridian of Greenwich. Art. xvii. Calculation of the Distance between the Stations on Black Down, in Dorsetshire, and Rippin Tor, in Devonshire. For the calculation of this distance, we must have recourse to the xiviith, x:vimth, xirxth, and uth triangles. (See Phi- losophical Transactions for 1797, and Plate XXX, Fig. 1 of this Volume.) Inthe two first, we have the whole angle at Pilsden, be- tween Dumpdon and Black Down = 152° 3%’ 2%"’,95, which, re- duced to the angle formed by the chords, becomes 152° 37'2.4)”,25. The sides forming this angle, are Dumpdon and Pilsden, Pilsden and Black Down: the distance between the two first stations being 78459,3 feet, and between the two last 79110,7 feet. From these data, the distance between Dumpdon and Black Down is found to be 153095,7 feet, the triangle for computa- tion being, MDCCc. 4,M 630 The Account of a Pilsden - - 152° 37! 24,25 Black Down - = 13 37 50 45 Dumpdon - = ~ 13 44 45 325 But this side may be also found, by computing with the whole angle at Charton Common, which angle, when reduced to the plane of the chords, becomes 141° 93’ 53”,75. The two sides are 581012,5 feet, and 103345 feet; which data give the fol- lowing triangle : Charton - = 141° 33’ 53",5 Dumpdon - 24 48 39 ,25 Black Down - 193 37 2% ,25; from whence we find the distance from Dumpdon to Black Down = 153094.6 feet. Wherefore, the mean, 153095,2 feet, maybe considered to be very nearly the true distance. In the th triangle, (Cawsand Beacon, Dumpdon, and Little Haldon) the angle at Cawsand Beacon is 43° 14/ 21”,25; and in the List, (Rippin Tor, Cawsand Beacon, and Little Haldon) the angle at the same station is 25° 30’ 39,75; their sum is 68° 45’ 1”, and, adding 1” for the necessary correction, it becomes 68° 452". Computing with this angle, and the including sides, (64020,5 and 18334 feet,) we obtain the following triangle : Rippin Tor - - 90°34! 95” Cawsand Beacon - 6845 2 - Dumpdon_ - - 20 40 23, which gives the distance from Dumpdon to Cawsand Beacon = 169014, feet. In the xxrxth triangle, the observed angle at Dumpdon is found to be 86° 39’ 8”5, and, by adding to it the horizontal angle at Dumpdon, between Rippin Tor and Little Haldon, and also that between Black Down and Charton Common, we get 125° 54 30,5, for the horizontal angle between Rippin Trigonometrical Survey. 631 Tor and Cawsand Beacon. To reduce this angle to that formed by the chords, 6” must be subtracted; therefore, 125° 54/ 24,5 is the angle for computation. The sides Dumpdon and Rippin Tor, Dumpdon and Black Down, (169014, and 153095,2 feet, ) with this angle, give the following triangle: Rippin Tor - - 25°36! 4,5 Dumpdon - 125 54 24,5 Black Down - 28 29 31, which gives the distance from Rippin Tor to Black Down = 286973,9 feet. On referring to the observations made in 1797, on Black Down, it will be seen that the angle between Rippin Tor and the staff erected near Abbotsbury, was 3° 8’ 52”,5, and the angle between Pilsden and the same staff 45° 16’ 19”; their difference, 42° 7’ 20”,5, is the angle between Rippin Tor and Pilsden. Now, if the angles of the triangles, five in number, used in finding the distance between Rippin Tor and Black Down have been observed correctly, and the calculations properly made, the computed angle at Blackdown, between those sta- tions, should be, of course, the same; but the angle formed by the chords of the arcs between Blackdown and Pilsden and ~ Dumpdon, has been found = 193° 37’ 50”,5, (which is very nearly the same.as the horizontal one,) and the angle between Dumpdon and Rippin Tor = 282 29’ 31”, which it is also un- necessary to correct: their sum is 42° 7' 21”,5, the very angle observed. It is not, perhaps, proper to dismiss this considera- tion, without observing that this agreement affords a strong proof of the excellence of our instrument, as the triangles, from their magnitude and nature, are not so disposed as to favour the comparison. 4M 2 632 The Account of a ArT. x1x. Latitude and Longitude of Rippin Tor. The angle at Blackdown, between the staff at Abbotsbury and the meridian, has been found = 101° 91’ 1”,5, nearly, and that between Rippin Tor and the same staff == 9° 8' 50,53 there= fore, 98° 22’ 8” is the angle which Rippin Tor makes with the meridian, and this, taken from 180°, leaves 81° 37’ 52”, the bearing of Rippin Tor SW from Black Down. This angle, with the distance found above, gives 28 585,3 feet, for the distance of Rippin Tor from the meridian of Black Down, and 56086,0 feet, for that from its perpendicular ; therefore, the latitude is 50° 39’ 59”,1, and the longitude west from Black Down, 1° 13’ 3,8; consequently, its longitude west of Green- wich is 3° 45° 26’. Direction of the Meridian at Butterton Hill, On the 6th of May, in the afternoon, the angle between the Pole Star, when at its greatest ap- parent elongation from the meridian, and the staff on Hemmerdon Ball was observed, and found to be - - - - - 91° 29' 1375 And on the 7th, in the afternoon - - 97 4A 14 Half their sum is the angle between the meri- dian and the staff on Hemmerdon Ball - 94 16 44 Again, on the 7th, in the afternoon, the angle between the Pole Star, when at its greatest appa- rent elongation from the meridian, and the staff on Hemmerdon Ball was observed, and found to be - - - - ~ gi 29 12 Half the sum of this, and the angle observed Trigonometrical Survey. 633 in the forenoon of the same day, (97° 4 14\’) git oak ney ss 7 g4° 16' 43” Hence, 94° 16’ 44)’ may be considered as the true angle be- tween the meridian and the staff on Hemmerdon Ball. The angle between the station on Rippin Tor and Hemmer- don Ball, is 121°17' 7,75; therefore, 121° 17° 7,75 — 94° 16° AA! = 27° 0! 29,75, is the bearing of Rippin Tor, north-east of Butterton. This angle, with 62951 feet, gives 28585,2 feet, and 56086,6 feet, for the distance of Rippin Tor from the meridian and perpendicular ; which, using 61182 and 60847 fathoms, for the lengths of degrees on the meridian and perpendicular, re- spectively become 4 40”,3, and 9’ 13”. Therefore, in the right angled spherical triangle BPT, (Plate XXX, Fig. 2,) in which B is Butterton, P the pole, T Rippin Tor, and R the point where the parallel to the perpendicular cuts the meridian, we have the co-latitude of T, or Rippin Tor, = 39° 26’ 0”,9, and RT = 4/ 40',3, We have, consequently, cosine 4/ 40”,3 : radius : : cosine 39° 26’ 0,9 : cosine 39° 26’ 0,7, the co-latitude of the point R. So PB = PR + RT= g9° 26’ 0",7 + 9/ 19" = 39 35! 13,7; therefore,-the latitude of Butterton is 50° 24/ 46,3, and its longitude west from Greenwich, 3° 52’ 4,7”,5. ArT. xx. Calculation of the Distance between Hensbarrow and Butterton. The most convenient, as well as the most accurate mteans of computing this distance, will be by referring to the tvith, rvith, and ixivth triangles, in the series of 1796, where the sum of the observed angles at Carraton Hill is 136° 52’ 43”. The correc- tion for reducing this angle to that formed by the chords, is 4’: therefore, 136° 52’ 39" is the proper angle for computation¢ 634 The Account of a. The distance from Hensbarrow to Carraton Hill, is 100416 feet, and from Butterton to that station 131576 feet. (See Phil. Trans. for 1797, p. 458, 460.) These data give the following triangle, viz. Carraton Hill - - 136° 52’ 39” Hensbarrow - - 24 35 5755 Butterton - - 18 31 23,5, which gives 21602 feet, for the distance between Hensbarrow and Butterton Hill: The angle between Carraton Hill and Rippin Tor was ob- served in 1796, and found = 101° 9’ 44/’,25. (See Phil. Trans. 1797.) The angle between Hensbarrow and Rippin Tor is 119° 35’ 3,25; therefore, 18° 31’ 19” is the angle between Hensbarrow and Carraton. The difference between the hori- zontal and chord angle is 0,25 nearly; this, added to 18° 31' 23”,5, gives 18° 31’ 23”,75, which is nearly the same as the observed angle. This agreement proves, that the angles of the triangles connecting Butterton and Hensbarrow have been ob- served correctly. ART. xxI. Latitude and Longitude of Hensbarrow. The angle between Hensbarrow and Hemmerdon, (see Ob- servations made at Butterton, ) was 1° 52’ 4,",5; therefore, as the angle between the latter and the meridian = 94° 16’ 44,”, we get 92° 24/ 39”,5, for the angle which Hensbarrow makes with the _ same meridian. The distance from Hensbarrow to Butterton, as found above, is 21602 feet; this, with the angle g2° 24/ 39,5, gives the distance of Hensbarrow from the meridian = 215871 feet, and from the perpendicular go8g feet; these, converted into parts of degrees, become 35’ 17,1, and 1’ 29’,62. There- Trigonometrical Survey. 635 fore, the latitude of Hensbarrow is 50° 29’ 3,3, and its longi- tude, west of Butterton, 55’ 20,2 ; consequently, its longitude, west of Greenwich, is 9° 52! 47,5 + 55/ 20,2 = 4° 48! 7,7. ART xxl. Direction of the Meridian at St. Agnes Beacon. On the g2d of May, in the forenoon, the angle between the Pole Star, when at its greatest elongation from the meridian, and the staff near Peranzabulo, was observed, and found to be - - - - - 38° 26 1,5 And on the ged, in the afternoon - Ad © 33,25 Half their sum is the angle between the meri- dian and staff - - - Al 13-1755 The angle between the staff at Peranzabulo and the station Hensbarrow, was also observed at the same station, and found to be 31° 50’ 55,5; wherefore, 41° 19 17”",5 -- 31° 50’ 554.5 = 73° 4/ 13”, is the angle between Hensbarrow and St. Agnes Beacon. ART. xxl. To find the Latitude and Longitude of St. Agnes ' Beacon. In Plate XXX. Fig. 3. Let A be the station at St. Agnes, P the pole, H Hensbarrow, and B the point where the parallel to the meridian of St. Agnes cuts that meridian, BHP being a right angled spherical triangle on the earth’s surface. PH has been already found = 39° 36’ 56”,7; and, as BH, the distance of Hensbarrow from the meridian, = 92878, and AB, the distance from the perpendicular, = 28271, we get BH =15' 10,9, and AB = 4/ 38,8; which arcs are found by using 61182 and 60845 fathoms, for the length of their respective 636 The Account of a degrees. From these data, the latitude of the point B is easily derived; for cosine 15’ 10”,9 : radius :: cosine 39° 36’ 56”,7: cosine 39° 36’ 54,",2, the co-latitude of B; hence 39° 36’ 54/",2 + 4/ 38”,8 = 39° 41' 33”,0 the co-latitude of A; hence 50° 18’ 27" is the latitude of St. Agnes. Its longitude, west from Hensbarrow, is also found by a simple proportion; sine 39° 36’ 54,2 : radius : :-sine 15’ 10,9: sine 0° 29’ 48"; therefore, 4 48" 7",7 + 0° 23/ 48” = 5° 11’ 55,7, is the longitude of St. Agnes, west of Greenwich. | ART. Xx1V.— Remarks. I have shewn, with attention to minuteness, the manner in which the latitudes and longitudes of the stations on which directions of meridians have been observed are determined. It now remains to be considered, how far the uncertain state in which we remain, with respect to the figure of the earth, may affect the accuracy of those conclusions. If the earth were homogeneous, it would necessarily be an ellipsoid; and, were its diameters known, the longitudes and latitudes of places on its surface might be accurately computed, provided their geodetical situations were correctly ascertained, and the latitude of one station in the series of triangles truly determined. As there is, however, great reason to suppose that the earth is not any regular geometrical figure, from the impossibility of reconciling the results of the various measurements for ascer- taining the lengths of degrees of latitude, some uncertainty must remain with respect to our deductions; but there seems to be reasons for supposing the errors, thence resulting, are confined within moderate limits. Trigonometrical Survey. 637 In making computations on a given hypothesis of the earth’s figure, the truth of the conclusions, as well as the ease with which they are found, materially depends on the distances of the ‘objects from their respective fixed meridians. If the difference of longitude approaches nearly to, or exceeds 3°, to compute that longitude, and also the latitude, it is necessary the precise figure should be understood; because the analogy does not hold good, in that case, between the equality of the sums of the angles of spherical and spheroidical triangles on the earth’s surface. With regard to latitudes, more particularly when the distances are diminished by means of frequent new directions of meridians, a knowledge of the exact length of a degree of a great circle is not necessary ; because the determi- nation of those latitudes, by means of spherical computation, being true as to sense, the cosines of those small arcs will remain the same. As there cannot be a doubt justly entertained of the latitude of Greenwich being very accurately determined, as particularly set forth by the Astronomer Royal in his reply to M. Cassin1, it is reasonable to suppose, that if any errors do exist in the latitudes of those stations, they can only have arisen from the computations being made with erroneous lengths of degrees on the meridian. In our former Papers on this subject, we have taken it for granted, that the length of a degree of the meridian at the middle point between Greenwich and Paris, (50° 10’,) is 60842 fathoms, (which supposition may be considered just, provided the latitude of Paris, 48° 50’ 14’, be as near the truth as 51° 28’ 40” is to that of Greenwich, ) and afterwards added g fathoms, MDCCC. 4,N 638 The Account of a ners it 60851, in order to get the length of the degree in 50° 41’; (see Phil. Trans. 1795, p. 5373) these g fathoms, however, were not arbitrarily assumed, but computed. If the latitude of Paris be 48° 50’ 15", (Conn. des Tems, 1797-98, p- 373.) the length of the degree will be about 7 fathoms greater, which will make the degree in 50° 41’, 60849 instead of 60842 fathoms. . The latitude of the station on Beachy Head, 50° 44/ 23,7, was found by using 60861 fathoms for the length of a degree on the meridian in 51° 6’; but, if it be true that 48° 50’ 15” is the latitude of Paris, the latitude of Beachy Head will be about one-third.of a second greater. This seems to be the limit of the probable error in the computed latitude of this station ; since its proximity to the meridian of Greenwich, obviates any doubt of the conclusions being affected by any uncertainty respecting the length of the degree of the great circle perpendicular to the meridian. The latitude of Dunnose was determined by computing the distance between the parallels of that station and Beachy Head ; (see Phil. Trans. for 1795, p. §22;) which method is very exact, and preferable to any other, since the small space between the parallels was determined with great accuracy, leaving not a doubt of a greater error than g feet, a quantity corresponding to about =4d part of a second. And, since the same method has been “adugnea to find the difference of latitude between Black Down and Dunnose, it is highly probable that the lati- tude of the former station is not removed more than —+ths of a second from the true one, that of Beachy Head wer supposed = 50° 44! 23",7. Trigonometrical Survey. 639 . It would have been fortunate, had the difference of latitude between Black Down and Butterton, and Butterton and St. Agnes Beacon, been determined in the same manner, since the latitudes of all these important stations would, in that case, have been found with evident accuracy ; but, whoever has leisure and inclination to go through these calculations, will find that, by means of the directions of meridians at Butterton and St. Agnes Beacon, the latitudes of those stations may be found to within halfasecond. By this I mean, that, allowing the latitude of Black Down to be 50° 41’ 13,8, the latitude of Butterton, 50° 24/ 46,3, will not deviate more than half a second from the truth; and the same may be said with respect to the latitude of St. Agnes, that of Butterton being admitted as correct. Supposing, therefore, the latitude of Greenwich to be 51° 28’ 40”, we may rely on the assurance of the latitude of St. Agnes Beacon being determined within 12” of the truth. ; With respect to the longitudes of these stations, their accu- racy entirely depends on the observations made at Dunnose and Beachy Head, for determining the length of a degree of a great circle perpendicular to the meridian. The truth of the deduction drawn from those observations rests on their accuracy $ and it can scarcely be deemed presumptuous to assert, that an error of more than 1” cannot have existed in either of the angles. On this account, therefore, I should suppose, that the difference of longitude between those stations, has been found so nearly as to leave no greater error than 1”. The whole of the operation to which I now allude, was performed with great care; the directions of the meridians having been determined by means of double azimuths of the Pole Star, confirmed by com- puted azimuths. In returning to the consideration of this sub- 4Ne 640. The Account of a ject, I do not perceive any source of error likely to affect the conclusions, unless it be that to which all astronomical obser- vations, made with instruments adjusted by plumb-lines or levels, areliable. In determining differences of longitude through these means, the direction in which any lateral attraction must act, to produce a maximum of error, is at right angles to the meri- dian. If the attraction be in the plane of it, it is obvious the double azimuth, although the telescope of the theodolite does not move ina vertical, will nevertheless give, almost exactly, the true direction of the meridian. The high lands about St. Catherine’s Light-House, in the Isle of Wight, are about six miles from Dunnose, and nearly west of it; but it does not appear that the effect of their lateral attrac- tion can have produced any sensible error; since it may be shewn, that the plumb-line of the sector at Schehallien would have deviated only a small part of a second from the true ver- tical, had the sector itself been placed at that distance from the hill. Beachy Head is situated at the eastern extremity of the South Downs; a defect of matter towards the east imme- diately taking place. This circumstance renders the observa- tions liable to some small errors, on account of the superior lateral attraction in the opposite direction ; but, notwithstanding it is very probable that an error induced by either of these attractions, is so very small as to render the subject scarcely worth consideration, yet, as both lie the same way, it is satisfac- tory to consider that they mutually tend to correct the errors which may result from either; we may, therefore, safely con- clude, that 1° 11’ 36” is very nearly the true longitude between the station on Beachy Head and that on Dunnose.' Under this persuasion, I consider it probable that the longitude of Black | Trigonometrical Stievey. 641 Down cannot err in excess or defect more than 9”; that of But- terton 5”; and that of St. Agnes Beacon 6”. The latitudes and longitudes of these important stations, brought under one point of view, will be as follows : Latitude. Longitude west from Greenwich. In degrees. In time. Black Down - 50°41’ 13,8 2° 32! 99/4 10’ 9",5 Butterton Hill - 50 24 46,3 3 52 N75 15 31,2 St. Agnes Beacon 50 18 27 § 115557 20 47,7 Note. It may probably be expected, that I should determine the directions of the meridians at Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon, by calculation, and’ afterwards compare them with the observed ones. I have desisted from the measure in the body of the work, and reserved the little I have to say for this note. ’ If the earth were a perfect sphere, or an ellipsoid of known diameters, the direction of the meridian, at any station not very remotely situated from the parallel of another, might be determined, provided the direction of the meridian at that station were ob- served, and the value of the arc subtended by the space between them pretty accurately ascertained, and also the latitude of the station, at which the angle is given, nearly obtained. Thus, if it be required to find the angle at Dunnose, between Beachy Head and the meridian, from the observed angle at the latter station, and the arc between them, we shall. have 39° 15’ 36”,3, the co-latitude of Beachy Head, and 55’ 28",7 for the oblique arc. These data (two sides and an included angle) give 1° 26’ 48”,4, for the difference of longitude between Beachy Head and Dunnose, and 81° 56'§2",6, for the angle which the meridian at the latter makes with the former station. The difference of longitude found in a rather more:correct way, has been heretofore shewn to be 1° 26’ 47",93, (see Philos. Trans. 1795. p. 523,) and the angle at Dunnose was also shewn to be 81° 56 53”, from observation, which may be considered the same with that found: by this mode of computation. In all cases in which the data were equally correct, no doubt the direction of meridians might be computed, without fear of the results deviating much from the truth ; but, if it be required to find the angle at Black Down, from the observed direction of the meridian at Dunnose, a different method must be used. It is, however, less accurate than the former one, and it has been expressly for this: reason, that Ihave not introduced this subject into. the account. | The Account of a In the adjoining diagram, suppose B, Black Down; D; Dunnose ; and, N, Nine Barrow. Down. also, let RB, the me- ridian of Black Down, be prolonged to M, and DM be drawn, PM being — —PD. Then we shall have three spherical tri- found from observations to be 4° 30’ 28", and BND 172° 27' 33'55 3 these give the angle BDN = 3° 1’ 59",5, nearly, be- cause the excess of the three angles above 180° is 1". The observed angle at D, Dunnose, between Nine Barrow. Down and the meridian DP, or PDN, was 87°56' 53”; therefore, 87° 56’ 53” — 3°1' 59,5 = 84° 54’ 53",5, is the angle at D, between the meridian and the station on Black Down. Now, the difference of longitude between‘B and D,.or the angle at P, has been already found = 1° 20’ 46",4; and, since BP is very nearly = PD, and BD is small, we shall have rad. ; tang. P :: cosine DP ; cosine BMD = 89° 28’ 47”.. But the angle PDB has been found = 84° 54'53",53 therefore, 89° 28! 47" — 84° 54'53",5 = 4° 33' 53,"5, the angle BDM; hence, 180° o! 2”-— 94° 2'40",5 = 85° 57' 21,"5, or MBD ; therefore, 94° 2' 38,"5, or DBP, is the angle at Black Down obtained in this way, which differs nearly 16" from the observed one, viz. 94° 2’ 22",75. It is probable, some portion of this arises from defects in the observation made at Dunnose, on the lights fired at Nine Barrow Down: only two lights were seen; and, as the ob- servations differed 5” from each other, some degree of doubt exists, as to the accuracy of the angle. The angle at Nine Barrow Down, between Black Down and Dunnose, is not absolutely to be depended on for purposes of this kind, although there can be no doubt of its being sufficiently near the truth, for that to which it has been before applied. In the correction of the angles at that station, in our former accounts, we proceeded on the supposition of their being less satisfactory than the other angles of the triangles to which. Nine Barrow Down is a common station. For these reasons, I am of opinion the computed angle cannot be applied as a test to the observed .one ; and it also appears to me, that greater objections lie against similar comparisons be- tween the computed and observed angles at Butterton and St. Agnes; as those stations could not be seen from each other, nor the latter from Black Down. Although the. computed directions of the meridians differ some seconds from the observed ones, I am by no means doubtful of the truth of the latter; as the double azimuths of. the Pole Star, found from computation, agree very satisfactorily with those which have been used in obtaining the directions of the several meridians. In finding the value of the oblique arc, or the line which joins Black Down and Dunnose, as used in the first method of computation, I have had recourse to the following correct expression, Viz. pS ENE et ; where d is the length of the required degree, p that of the great Pm —p - S$? circle perpendicular to the meridian, m that of a degree of the meridian itself, and s the sine of the angle constituted by the oblique arc and the meridian. angles BPD, BND; and BMD. Now, the angle NBD was Trigonometrical Survey. 643 Art. xxv. Bearings of the Stations in the Series of 1795 and1796, from the Parallels to the Meridians of Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon ; likewise their Distances from those Mertdians, and from their Perpendiculars. Meridian of Black Down. Bearings from the Parallel to the Meridian, earns AL, pains: : ; o NE Nn Feet. Feet. Bull Barrow - Black Down] 42 z 30 NE 5 3643,2 5948957 Mintern - - - - 10:36 33 NE 10996,8 58709 Pilsden - - - - | 56 14 48 NW 65775,6 | 439554 Charton Common - - vts3- go 3 NW 502681 11697,5 Dumpdon - Charton Common} 45 4 o NW 143749 52670,9 Rippin Tor —- - = £3)°81 37 52°SW Meridian of Butterton, Rippin Tor == Butterton | 27 023 NE 28585,3 | 56086,6 Furland - = - 78 37 39 SE 78066, 3 15883 Bolt Head = = - 14 49 48 SE 1855153 7006554 Maker Heights - 7o 36 g SW 71467,9 | 25164,3 Kit Hill —- - - 67 12 12 N Wi 93081,9 | 39121,7 Carraton Hill - - a 7353 22 NW 126408,9 36511,3 Cawsand Beacon - Rippin Tor} 35 35 29 NW 86744,4 | 108147,5 Little Haldon - Furland 425 2 NE 8457154. 56675,8 Bindown - - Maker 70 448 NW 52926,6 19180,1 Hensbarrow — - - - 87 35 18 SW 92878,0 28271,0 "Meridian of ‘SE. Agnes Beacon. 28279,9 Hensbarrow - St. Agnes Beacon] 73 4 13 NE 9287734 Deadman = - 722427 SE 9729235 30849 Karnbonellis - - - 3 27 27 SW 274147 453792 Karnminnis - - 61 13 58 SW 741681 40719 eae i £ Ecasbaccon 37 ap 45 NE 12170352 65825,8 c 75 29 51 SE 1529453 | 12733,5 St. Burian Karnbonellis 67 20 59 SW 94831,5 83807,3 Pertinney - - Kar: minnis 39 25 32 SW 100465,1 72704,4. Sennen - - Pertinney 40 50 18 SW 113674,4 | 879868 644 The Acchunt of a~ Art. xxvi. Latitudes and Longitudes of the Stations in the Series of 1795 and 1796. Meridian of Black Down. ¢ Names of Stations. eres Bull Barrow - - Mintern - - Pilsden - - - Charton - - Dumpdon - - ‘Rippin Tor - = Meridian of Butterton Hill. Furland = = Little Haldon ss = Cawsand Beacon - Bolt Head - = Maker - - - Kit Hill 5 - Carraton Hill a = Bindown - ae Hensbarrow S 2 Meridian of St. Agnes. Lansallos > é Bodmin Down - - Deadman - - Karnbonellis ° - | 50 Karnminnis - ° 50 St. Burian - 50 Pertinney : . 50 Sennen - © - | 50 Latitude. ” 5° 5° 5955 50 50 52,8 IO o4 Il 43,8 4 37:9 6 27,0 3 55,6 In degrees. WwNN BNO PPP ARWWWw ‘ie MAMMA pp 18 29,2 29 31,6 49 23,1 Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. In time, m. Ss. 9 14 9 58,1 Il 1755 Il 5555 14 38,3 15 1;7 14 10,3 14 451 15 40,1 5 12,2 I 5) ib 17 4bI 17 3857 19 12,5 18 11,0 18 42,6 19 38,3 20 5035 22 355 22 2453 22 30,5 22 4355 Trigonometrical Survey. 645 ¢ Art. xxvil. Bearings of the intersected Objects, from the Stations in the Series of 1795 and 1796, from the Parallels to the Meri- dians of Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon ; and likewise their Distances from these Mertdians. Meridian of Black Down. Distances Distances from merid. | from perp. Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. At Bull Barrow. fee By Feet. Feet. Portland Light House - 19 47 16 SE 21581 59985 Noil Windmill - - 10 12 56 NE 72842 166029 Noil Steeple - - - = 2u 53). 29 NE 86610 1415 34. Holy Trinity, - Shaftsbury| 25 41 52 NE 81081 116506 St. Rumbold’s Steeple, Ditto 28 12 51 NE 80486 109522 Maypowder Steeple - - 85 17 11 NW 29526 61479 Stourhead House - - - o 27 46 NW 52881 153806 Mr. Frampton’s Obelisk ° 10 3 4SE 63588 3384. Mere Steeple - 6 40 55 NE 63893 146984. Mrs. Thornhill’s Obelisk | - 22 18) 51 NW 40391 91778 Odcomb Spire - . 70 25 oNW 35474. g1194 Milborne Port - - e 38 21 20 NW 20110 101865 At Black Down. : Puncknoll Flagstaff - 89 957 NW 25612 373 Lambert’s Castle - - 65 17 36 NW 67269 30950 Lyme Cobb = - 82 21 29 NW 89547 12015 At Pilsden. Golden Cape - - 444 3SW 68239 14209 Glastonbury Tor - - 14 19 23 NE 34314 167176 Bridport Beacon - 8 19 55 SW 72199 9! Lord Rolle’s Barn, near Sidmouth 64 34 38 SW 101743 26859 At Dumpdon. Naval Flagstaff, Whitlands - 32 45 10 SE 116249 9920 Catherstone Lodge - - 22945 NE 140940 117131 Lord Lisburne’s Obelisk - 46 47 34 SW 225502 24119 Sir J. de la Pole’s Flagstaff - - 52 342 SE 86622 8137 Honiton Steeple - = 12 24 9 SW 146681 39339 St. Mary Ottery Steeple - - 42 21 56 SW 179904 13028 Sir Robert Palk’s Tower - 58 56 2SWw 242012 6526 MDCCC. 4,0 646 The Account of a Meridian of Butterton. Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. oes a, fribiglee. At Little Haldon. Bie, Feet. Feet. North Bovey - - - a1 44 23 NW | agane 70289 Eastern Karn = - - - 56 27 52 NW 41145 85459 Western Karn - - - 53 12 toy Ww. 40730 89472 West Down Beacon - - - 63 59 14 NE 126152 76968 Woodley’s Summer House - - 83 39 47 SW 29448 50555 Berry Head Flagstaff - - 1022 16 SE 95740 4350 Brixen Steeple - - - 229 4 SE 87435 9331 Ipplepen Steeple - - 22 i o SW 68413 17180 Three Barrow Tor - - 68 43 3 SW 8667 27109 Brent Beacon - - 5O il 17 SW 15460 10390 At Butterton. Chudleigh Steeple - - 44 444 NE 67688 69900 Froward Flagstaff - - - | 95 © 28 SE 84342 22587 Start Point Flagstaff - - 39 22 33 SE 56544 68897 Marlborough Steeple - - | 16 42 32 SE 18429 61393 Bolt Head Flagstaff = - - 1457 7SE 18739 70173 Mewstone, highest point - - 52 45, 23 sow _ 49825 38108 Cupola, Hospital, Plymouth - 76 47 30 SW 66891 15699 St. John’s Steeple - - -| 79 3444 S5SW 83991 15447 | Saltash Steeple - - 89 37 12 SW 73707 489 Penlee Beacon - - - 64 59 49 SW 69758 32532 Plymstock Steeple - 5 73 4615 SW 49217 14326 © . Statten Barn - - - 64 43 53 SW 53270 25145 Mount Baiton - - 70 50 51 SW 58651 20370 Flagstaff, Plymouth Garrison - 72 OT 17 0S Wa~ 57021 17591 New Church, Plymouth - - 75 25 49 SW 56521 14691 Old Church, Plymouth - =|) 75 11. 56"S Wi 57505 15374 West Chimney, Governor’s House 75 42 15 SW 64497 164.35 Flagstaff on Mount Wise - - 75 40 55 S W 65281 16662, Chapel, Plymouth Dock - 77 33 23 SW 67040 14792 Obelisk, Crimhill Passage, Plymouth ah 7 9h SW) 66728 18984 Mount Edgecumbe House - 72 18 23 SW 65827 | 21001 Flagstaff, Maker Tower - - 70 53 41 SW 68224 23632 Naval Signal Staff, Maker Tower 70 54 37S W 68232 23626 Eddystone Light House - - 46 1 27 SW 87190 “| 84127 ’ At Butterton. Stonehouse Steeple = - 65 32 37°S W 53078 24140 Puslinch Obelisk - - - 45 17 46 SW 27480. 27223 Flagstaff, Rame Head - 65 13 44 5 W. 76935 35774 At Rippin ue Great Haldon - - - 52 27 “oO NE 72023 89479 Trigonometrical Survey. 64,7 Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. aes goes oa es Cs Se ee are eee ee | ee At Maker. 1h Feet. Feet. Hemmerdon Ball - - 62 10 37 NE 27722 2077 Brent Tor - - 5 27 45 NE 62385 69820 Blockhouse Flagstaff - 27 51 26 NE 64005 11043 Rame Steeple - - = 20 20 12 SW 74388 33043 Chapel, Dockyard - - 23 “650 NE 67042 14795 Flagstaff, Statten Battery - - 83°49 5 SE 54278 25719 Windmill, Plymouth Dock - 29 47 35 NE 65963 15549 ; At Kit Hill. St. Stephen’s Steeple - - 19 29 31 SE 78182 2979 St. Ive Steeple - e 56 20 4SW 114213 25047 Callington Steeple - - 43 014 SW 98219 33013 Linkinghorn Steeple - - | 69 8 31 NW LIIA17 46108 St. Dominic Steeple - - 27 19 41 NE 89512 46030 South Petherwin Steeple - - 34 618 NW 115216 71807 South Hill - - 7457 40 NW 108044 43142 St. Cleer Steeple - - 7442 9 SW 133492 27795 At Carraton Hill. Cheese Rings - - - 44. 0 29 NW 133198 43540 Liskeard Steeple - ~ - |° 15 19 39 SW 132155 15546 Landrake Steeple - - 46 1 2SE 92463 3750 Duloe Steeple - - - 15 23 3S W 137923 5330 Menheniot Steeple - - 11 59 44 SE 121941 15479 Polparrow Flagstaff - - zo 8 5 SW 138871 2521 Lord Camelford’s Obelisk: - 48 33 15 SW 163992 3324. Boconnock Steeple - - 4434 58 SW 158753 3692 Roach Steeple = - - 66 30 33 SW 218318 3434 Roach Rock - - 65 58 15 SW 217204 3969 Meridian of St. Agnes. At Lansallos. Lanlivery Steeple ° . 56 48 14 NW 119848 34388 Helmen Tor - = GALS 53 55°17 NW 113818 41243 Mr. Tremaine’s Summer House - 67 21 40 SW 96548 10787 Gorran Steeple - - -| 5855 59 SW 95877 21647 Flagstaff, Deadman = - 51 46 44 SW 97959 31278 Gwineas Rocks - - 53 9 oSW 106551 22037 At Hensbarrow. Hendellion Steeple - - - 22659 NW 89918 97463 Stone, St. Braeg’s Down - 17 31 12 NW 81868 63145 St. Dennis Steeple - - 83 625 NW 77630 30114 Lansallos Steeple - = 7343 28 SE 149787 11656 Gerrans Steeple - 20° 23°53 S W 55357 46773 St.Michael Carhayes Steeple - 9 39 51 SW 84768 19353 4,0 2 648 The Account of a Distances Distances from merid,| from perp. - Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. a ee ee pee Of Ps oD Feet, Feet, St. Kivern Steeple - - 29 647 SW. 30611 93398 Flagstaff, Blackhead - - 24.50 30 SW 31214 104917 | Windmill, near Fowey - - 67 244 SE 134347 10797 . Menabilly House - - 60 26 48 SE 123516 10899 Old Tower at Polruan - 64 44 37 SE 35892 7978 . Flagstaff, St. Anthony’s Head (.*) 26 35 45 SW 48664 60038 At the Deadman. St. Veep’s Steeple - - 39 429 NE 140146 21930 At St. Agnes. St. Columb Minor Steeple - 44757 NE 40698 -41950 | Peranzabulo - - 41 54 34 NE 19354 21563 St. Eval Steeple - - = 37 52 39 NE 50275 64632 Cubert Steeple - - 42 26 53 NE 23773 25991 Flagstaff; Pendennis Castle - - 34 19 23 SE 39999 58586 Windmill, St, Mawe’s - = 45 52 9 SE 48079 46642 Karnbre Castle - - - | I) 53 47°98 W 6480 30760 . Illugan Steeple - - 30 1 2SW 11865 20537 St. Paul’s Steeple - - 20 21 16 SW 38457 103660 | Lord Dunstanville’s House - 40 33 25 SW 19726 23050 | Gwinear Steeple - - 39 33 34 SW 39578 47911 Cow and Calf - - - 23 47 22°NE 37174 87044 Camborn Steeple - - 30 16 51 SW 19881 34048 St. Erme Steeple - - 88 42 22 NE 44657 1009 St. Allen Steeple - - 85 13 35 NE 36688 3064 Ludguan Steeple - - 47 39 58 SW 64737 58976 At Karnboneliis, Lizard Windmill - - 147 24SE 573 114785 Grade Steeple - - OAL 7S Be | 5710 117451 Ruan Major Steeple —- - 3 46 21 SE 1486 109496 St. Hilary Steeple - 66 19 33 SW 49009 65664. Mr. Rogers’s Tower, near St. fees =i), 383 23 ROUS Wi 18396 47102 Madern Steeple - - 76 53 40 SW 81542 63725 Parklough Flagstaff = - 6 55 1S W 10735 111240 At Karuminnis. St. Buryan Steeple - - 25 45 25 SW 95205 84320 At St. Buryan. . Chapel Karnbury - - 3 25 16 NW 95472 73098 Flagstaff; St. Leven’s Point - 77 29 40 SW 114449 88158 Sennen Steeple - - -| 83 44 37 SW 112202 85712 At Pertinney. : Stone, Lann’s ExD = ~~ = 48 5 30S W 116222 86847 * The letter D is added (as in the former accounts) to those places respecting which any doubts are entertained. Trigonometrical Survey. 64.9 Art. xxvill. Latitudes and Longitudes of such intersected Objects, in the Series of 1795 and 1796, as have been referred to the Meri- dians of Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes. : - ongitude from |Longitude west of Greenwich. Bae tes se pieciae iS Taek Down, Th degrees In ae j OW o «4 4 o 7) m. Ss. Portland Light House “eel sO 2y 22,2) 1 0 5) 22.0 B | 2 26 4935 9 4753 Noil Windmill - Sat hE) 2055) | OS 5057 bl, 2 13) 24,7 8 53,0 Noil Steeple - - 51 4 27,1 |o 22 31,8 E] 2 19 50,6 | 9g 1953 Holy Trinity, - Shaftsbury|] 51 0 20,7 |o 21 3,6E| 2 11 18,8 8 45,3 St. Rumbold’s Steeple, Ditto | 50 59 11,8 | o 20 53,9 E| 2 11 28,5 8 45,3 Maypowder Steeple - 50 51 19,7 |}0 7 38,6E] 2 24 43,8 9 33,9 Stourhead House - - 51 6 29,5 | 0 13 46,0E| 2 18 36,4 | 9 14,4 Mr. Frampton’s Obelisk =''50 41 46,0 1.0 VO 2450 EB) 2) 15'257,9, | (9 13,5 Mere Steeple Gr 5 2h Ob VO, 37,01 | 2 skin) AA,8 9 2:9 Mrs, Thornhill’s Obelisk - | 50 56 17,5 |0 10 28,6E] 2 21 53, 9 27,6 Odcomb Spire - - 50 56 12,6 | 0 9 12,1 W| .2 41 3454 | 10 46,3 Milborne Port - - BO 57 5050.0. 5 1355 Kl 2.27 19.3 9 48,6 Puncknoll Flagstaff = - 5° 41 17,3 | 0 6 36,4.W| 2 38 58,8 | 10 35,9 Lambert’s Castle - = | 50 46 17,7 | 0 17 23,1 W| 2 49 45,5] BI 19 Lyme Cobb - ° 5° 43 10,0 |e 23 7, WI 2 55 29,4 | II 41,9 Golden Cape - - | 5° 43 32,5 |0 17 37:2 W] 2 49 §9,6 |] Ir 20 Glastonbury Tor - Gt S 47,7 10. 8 56,4.W] 2 AI 48,0 | LO 45,2 Bridport Beacon - 5° 41 13,2 | o 18 37,6 W|] 2 50 59,9 | II 24 Ld. Rolle’s Barn, near Sidmouth 5° 45 35:6 | o 26 17,2 W] 2 58 39,6 | 11 54,6 Naval Flagstaff, Whitlands LO 42 47,7 | 0 30:.20,4 Wi 3 2 2258 | 127, 9,5 Catherstone Lodge - - | 51_ 0 23,0 | o 36 36,6W| 3 8 59,0 | 12 35,9 Lord Lisburne’s Obelisk - ROU 97 1153 4) 0.59. 0530 Wl 3. 30,2050 | 4 1,9 Sir J. de la Pole’s Flagstaff - | 50 42 31,9 | o 22 21,4 W| 2 54 43,8 | 11 3839 Honiton Steeple - - OVA. Sigsk Ons 7 Gon 7 Wily (3 kOoRS,E it Teva s2 St. Mary Ottery Steeple - 50 43 12,9 | o 46 26,8 W] 3 18 49,2 | 13 15,3, Sir Robert Palk’s Tower = | 50 39 52,5 | 1 2 24,6W] 3 34°47, 14 1951. Meridian of Butterton Hill. Names of Objects. North Bovey Steeple (p.) + Eastern Karn - - Western Karn - - West Down Beacon - Woodley’s Summer House Flagstaff, Berry Head, Torbay Brizen Steeple - - Ipplepen Steeple - Three Barrow Tor - - Brent Beacon, near Ashburton Chudleigh Steeple - Froward Flagstaff - Flagstaff, Start Point = - Marlborough Steeple - Flagstaff, Bolt Head - - Mewstone, highest point - Cupola of Plymouth Hospital St. John’s Steeple (p.) = Saltash Steeple - - Penlee Beacon - - Plymstock Steeple - - Statten Barn Mount Batten - Flagstaff, Plymouth Gartner New Church, Plymouth - Old Church, Plymouth - Eddystone Light House - West Chimney, Governor’s House, Plymouth Dock - Flagstaff, Mount Wise - ‘Chapel, Plymouth Dock - Obelisk, Crimhill Passage Mount Edgecumbe House Flagstaff, Maker Tower Naval Flagst. near Maker Tow. Stonehouse Steeple - - Puslinch Obelisk - - Rame Head - - Great Haldon - - Hemmerdon Ball - - Brent Tor - Flagstaff, Blockhouse,Plymouth The Account of a Latitude. Lye) 5° 59° 5° 50 50 Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich, Butterton Hill. 01,0010. 0. (0'O OOO O| G10_0 0%00 OO) (O00) O 0 OOO) On O00000000000 0.0 i a 11; pF 10 36,3 E 10 30,1 E 32 30,0E 7 3458 24 331 E 22 24,8 E 17 33,8E 2 13,5 K 3 58,1 E 17.2559) & 21 36,3 E ADOOAORPADDAHRH HPAHRPRADR DARA REWLOWWWWWWWWHWWOY O In degrees. bt In time. Trigonometrical Survey. 651 Names of Objects. ea ines Longitude from |Longitude west of Greenwich. Butterton Hill. In degrees, In time. ‘OF ay a Onin, a“ oo" 7] m. S. Rame Steeple - - 50 19 18,7 | 0 37 59,8 W| 4 30 47.3 | 18 3,1 Flagstaff, Statten Battery 50 20 3158.4 © 13°54,1 W) 4 6 41,6 | 16 26,8 Windmill, Plymouth Dock 50 22 11,6 | 0 16 54,2W| 4 9 41,7 | 1€ 38,8 St. Stephen’s Steeple - 50124 15,1 © 20 3,0W| 4°12 50,5 | 16 51,3 St. Ive Steeple - - 50 28 49 ON29u20,2.W|-47°22 757 "17 26,5 Linkinghorn Steeple - 5© 32 1753 | 08 28)30,2:W| “4 21 26,7 | 17 25,8 St. Dominic Steeple (v.) =hgO 32 17564 © 23° 1,2) 4 15 4857 | 17 3,2 South Petherwin Steeple - 50 36 30,4 | 0 29 40,4W] 4 22 27,5 | 17 29,8 South Hill Steeple - 50 31 48,3 | 0 27 46,9W| 4 20 34,4 | 17 22,3 St. Cleer Steeple - - 50 29 15 O 34 33,1 W| 4 27 20,6 | 17 49,4 Callington Steeple - FOIZO 14,90) CO 25014.4 Wi 4 18 “9-97 1251 Cheese Rings - - GO Zu HOMO) 3424.14.90 WI 34°27" 2.4" 17 48,1 Liskeard Steeple - - 50 27 14,4 | 0 33 55:5 W] 4 26 43,0 | 17 46,8 Landrake Steeple - ROlL2G 26,7 4) 0* 23843,3 W| 4 16,3058 | 17 “6 Duloe Steeple - - 50 23 48,0 | 0-35 21,.9W] 4 28 9,4 | 17 52,6 Menheniot Steeple - GOl27 W464 © 39218,3, Wi 4624 5,8) 17 36.4 Polparrow Flagstaff — - 5O: 25 | Ssh) Hl Ol 359 37.4. WW” 4 282459") 57 53:0 Lord: Camelford’s Obelisk 50-25 11,1 | o'42 4,2W| 4 34 51,7 “| 18. 19,4, Boconnock Steeple - FO. 26 Wihssic| oO 40rA3,7 Wil 4 3393152 "18 14,1 Roach Rock = - 5OI2G 5354 | © 55°41,8 W| 4 48 29,4 | 19 13,9 Roach Steeple - - 50 23 53,7 | ©%55°59,1 W) 4 48 46,6 | 19 15,1 Names of Objects. Lanlivery Steeple Heimen Tor - Mr. Tremaine’s Summer House Gorran Steeple = Flagstaff, Deadman Gwineas Rocks - Hendellion Steeple Stone, St, Braeg’s Down St. Dennis Steeple St. Michael Carhayes Steeple St. Kivern Steeple - Flagstaff, Blackhead Windmill, near Fowey Menabilly House - Old Tower at Polruan Flagstaff, St. Anthony’s St. Veep’s Steeple - St. Columb Minor Steeple Peranzabulo - re Se ee Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. St. AgnesBeacon.| In degrees. In time. - ° 30 44,0 E 4 41 157 18 44,8 - © 29 11,9E|] 4.42 43,8 | 18 50,9 O'Z4 41,0 E) 4 47 14,1 | 19 ° 8,9 = © 24 30,4E) 4 47 25,3 | 19 9,6 ; © 24 47,7E| 447 8,0 | 19 8,5 - 0 27 14,FE| 4 44 41,6.| 18 58,8 - © 23 8,5E| 4°48 47,2 | 19 15,1 - O21 1,7E| 4 50 54,0 | 19 23,6 - © 19 54,5E| 4 52 1,6 | 19 28,1 O 21 40,2E| 4 50 15,5 | 19 21 ON 7 ag5 BG. A 8,2 [Zo 16,5 © 7 56.4E} 5 3 59.3 | 20 15,9 - © 34 24,.2E| 4 37 31,5 | 18 30,1 Og 4750 4 94, AO 17.0) | arson t : © 34 47.7E) 4 37 8,0 | 18 28,5 Head O 12 24,7E} A $9 31,0 | 19 58,1 6 35 Sa4.75| 4.396) 80 || TS! 24,3 © 10 26,4E) 5 1 29:3 | 20 5,9 - 50 21 59.4 10 4 57,6E} 5 6 §8,2 | 20 27,9 652 | ~The Account of a , ; Longitude from] Longitude west of Greenwich, Nemes eae atte si Antes Beacon. Ti degtes. In time. ER ACL Oy te Cy “ erable ) St. Eval Steeple - 50 29 3,5 |012 549E| 4 59 0,8 | 19 56 . Cubert Steeple - 5° 22 43,0 | of 6: 5,6E |} ~hs5 gon 41 20 aage Flagstaff, Pendennis Castle 50 8 48,7 | 0 10 12,1 E| 5 (1 43:6 | 20°°6,9 Windmill, St. Mawes - 50 10 46,3 | 0 12 16,3E| 4 59 39:4 | 19 58,6 Karnbre Castle - - 50°13 23:0 | ov 2539.3 Wh 5-23 35301) ZOmgaoe j Illugan Steeple - 59 15 4410 3 1.9W) 5 14°5736 | zo hos8 St. Paul’s Steeple - 50 1 24,3 | 0 9g 47,0W| § 21 42,7 |\2Rizbe Lord Dunstanville’s House 5° 14 39.4 |0 5 255W) 5 16 58,2 | 21 7,8 Lansallos Steeple - 5° 20 15,3 | 0 38 16,2E| 4 33 39,5 | 18 14,6 Gerrans Steeple - 50 10 44,8 |o0 14 7,7E| 4 57 48,0 | 19 51,2 Gwinear Steeple - - 50 10 34, |-0 10 6,0W| 5 22 4857 | 21 28,5 Cow and Calf - - 5° 324458 | o 9 33.7 HE) 5 2 :22,0)1 207 sgES Camborn Steeple - 59 12 51010. § 4,7W) 5 17 sejQ jean St. Erme Steeple - 50 18 36,3 | o-11°25,7 E}. 5 0 30;0)) zou St. Allen Steeple : - 50 18 56,8 | o 9g 23,6E | °5 -2 32,1) 20 wove Ludguan Steeple - 50 8 44,1 | © 16 30,7W| 5 28 26,4 | 21 53,8 Windmill, Lizard - 49 59 3551 |0 0 8,7E} 5 12 4,4 | 20 48,3 Grade Steeple - - 49 59 8,8. | 0 1 27;1E] 5 10°28;6 | 20 4159 Ruan Major Steeple - 50° 0 27,2 | o 0)22,6F) 5 11 295% | 2enagre St. Hilary Steeple - 50 7 3857 | o112 20,7 W) 5. 24-254 0oT egy Mr. Rogers’s Tower - 50 10 42,4 |o 4 41,7W) 5 16 37,4 | 21 655 Madern Steeple - - 59 7 56,0 |.0 2094755 W| .5 32. 43.2 | 2mm Park Lough Flagstaff 50 9 9,9 |0 2 43,8 Wi) 5 14 39,5 | 20 58,6 Lizard Flagstaff - - 49.57 55:8 |o o 381 E| 5 11 17,7 | 20 455 St. Buryan Steeple - 50 4 32,8 | o 24 14,8 W| 5 36 10,5 | 22 24,7 Karnbury Chapel - 50°» 6 2355 |-0-24- 1958 Wieers 36 1S | eee St. Leven’s Point, Pingslag, 50 3 53:8 | 0 29 8.5 Wl 5 4t 4,2 | 22 aaee Sennen Steeple - 50 4 18,0 | 0 28 36,6 W| 5 40 29,9 | 22 41.9 Stone, Lanv’s Enp ~ 50 4 6,6 | o 29 35.8 W|. 5-41 3155 | >22eqer Notwithstanding almost the whole of the above latitudes and longitudes belong to objects near the sea coast, yet I have distinguised those which are actually upon it, from ’ those more remotely situated, by Italics. ; Trigonometrical Survey. 653 ART., XXIX. Bearings of the Stations in the Series of 1797 and 1798, from the Parallels to the Meridians of Black Down, But- terton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon ; and likewise their Distances from those Meridian s Meridian of Black Down. Names of the Stations. Beartages pane meee ai Heacos Ts alae Moor Lynch - “a 3 23 Ne i 71070 162067 Moor Lynch 5 - t Ash Beacon - 59 54 e sr t 5544 117624 Ash Beacon - t EOE Ob 46. 45 3 NE i 55557 164953 Moor Lynch ~ |. Danton od | ee see | 2968 | 245307 Ash Baron = Mendip = 4) 38 NE,]F sozr | royore dane t ocontit - 4/8 HE ANE [Pages | 88 Metio . ¢ Westbury - | 39 44 34N5 |f 92715 | 209344 bit ol au Farley Down ; eA be ae 577522) 257920 Merde on’. Dundey - 4/3859 NWT ssass | asso Bang? > f andor = 4] NEL} sou | arcu Meridian of Butterton Hill. re ree a aaa St. Stephen’s i Black Down - } 76°92 26 SE b suz97 72555 4 Meridian of St. Agnes Beacon. St. Agnes Beacon * 25 54 12 NE Hensbarrow = i Trevose Head { 39 49 34 NW 42858 88250 Trevose Head 62 18 48 NE Redeeis, Down i EE LO: Fit eae 119364 126702 Bodmin Do = ‘ 8 46 20 NE i i Brown Willy - 9] 16“) 42 SE biaz74s 104145 MDCCC. 4,P O54 The Account of a ART, XXX. Bearings of the Stations in the Series of 1799, from the Parallels to the Meridians of Dunnose and Greenwich; and likewise their Distances from those Meridians. Meridian of Dunnose. " Names of the Stations. Bearings. Fig 3 pi POUR CEL eee dd) a Se ees ee ee Beate 2AR, Feet. { Bagshot Heath - | 81 40 58 NE 108275 274173 Highclere - 4 Nuffield - - 35 30 40 NE 351480 | White Horse Hill - | 27 47 37 NW 349533 { Stow on the Wold 14 29 27 NW] 114915 469942 Brill - - 50 16 17 NE 443235 White Horse Hill Shotover Hill - 53 30 7 NE 413801 Scutchamfly - | 84 25 51 SE 344558 (Whiteham Hill - 36 30 13 NE 4agber Broadway - - | 33 3 55NW|]. 143396 | 513693 Stow on the Wold Epwell ; : 39 34 55 NE 530781 Shotover Hill - Cumner Hill - 76 58 3SW 40720g Corley Hill - 6 6 NW } 673637 Epwell - - y 39 5 3 P Arbury Hill —- 48 5 23. NE 586288 : Crouch Hill ~~ - 39 20 49 NW 522584 Bull 5 sek J Quainten - = 61 40 13 NE 462648 Meridian of Greenwich. eal ee } Wendover - { ee i é ae } 174338 100986 i f - aretinnge 6 46 : ' ae Hill x. } Bow Brickhill { a a 8 Me }rsrang 190493 i 2 - 85 8 30 NE cpeekcwonn if } Kinsworth = - { ie 55 “ SE }rz0910 141gb2 Bow Brickhill - ; z 74 6 27 SE } 4 Kinsworth —- S lealiytae { 50 54 40 NE B4215 171367 neste z \ Lidlington - { 2 yee = } 121834 202802 Lae > Wee Taustecetal t= { &9 oe ak pigxars 1g01ss KR Trigonometrical Survey. 655 Art. xxx1. Latitudes and Longitudes of the Stations in the Sertes of 1797 and 1798, referred to the Meridians of Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon. Meridian of Black Down. Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich, Names of the Stations. Latitude. Black Do In degrees. Taine: Va Cray) 7] oO 4 4 OM aire! mess Moor Lynch - - Sie Das 21-1 OO nZO,0 Wil 2 7505s Al TT 2,6 Ash Beacon - - GIO 003855 42Gh'1! 26,4 EB] 2 30 56 10 357 Long Knoll - - FES*SO1D; 2, PORT 412843 LE} 2 7 545% g 11,6 Dundon - - SNHogIOnSS 6,5. kereiigo7 Wr 2 43 39st). PaoNg4s2 Mendip - - 5IOLZIO FB koi 0895.9 Hi 2'392 Oss | renvessg Beacon Hill = - - GIXITG 2,6,)20049°206E|- 1 43 +158 6 5258 Westbury - - GESISOZ5 A Abohedi aH Eh 2) 8 °G,4 8 32,6 Farley Down = = 8102303574 QUE51I7,6 EF 2°17-14,8 9 8,9 Dundry - - ENIRG1O23052,2-110UR5 47,70W 2 98 Ost p tows alo Lansdown ~ - §1027050,4. 0} 8'30,6E]. 2 23 51,8 9 3554 Mertdian of Butterton Hill. , 5 Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. Names of the Stations. anaes: Butterton Hill, In degrees. In time. A CoE a Oars ye Ly Oe Hal Me 5: St. Stephen’s - - 502. O,7. 1 OU ZB So°GNVi al ei ae ta 2 Black Down - - 50 36 40,9 | 0 13 20,5Wi 4 6 8,0 | 16 24,5 Meridian of St. Agnes Beacon. Winseote? tie Stations, atinasle, ep opeitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. t. AgnesBeacon.| In degrees. In time, Ss me fo) a o , r] m. S$. Trevose Head + - 5c 32 56,5 | o 11 155 BE -i5" oO Gaztiteo 356 Cadon Barrow - - | 50 39 12,1 | 0 30 46,5E| 4 41 9,2 | 18 44,6 Brown Willy - - 5° 35 27,9 | © 36 45,3 EE} 4 35 10,4] 18 20,6 4Pe 656 The Account of a Art. xxxut. Latitudes and Longitudes of the Stations in the | Series of 1799, referred to the Meridians of Dunnose and Greenwich. Meridian of Dunnose. Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. Names of the Stations. Latitude. mehaats In degrees. Sn dime: ° 4 ° , 4 u m. Se Nuffield = - - -~ | 51 34 52,2 |o g 39,9 E rt 56,1 “terogney 9 White Horse Hill - 51 34 31,6 |o 22 1,7W| 1 33 37.7 | © 1455 Stow onthe Wold -~ - 51 54 16,3 | 0 30 26,7W) 1 42 2,4 | 6 48,1 Broadway - - 52 1 25:6 | o 38 5,3W] 1 49 41,3 | 7 18,7 Brill - - - 51 49 56,6 |o 7 394E| 1 3 56, 4 1557 Scutchamfly - - | 51 33 44.1 |0 8 37 Wi] 1 20 13,0 | 5 20,8 Shotover Hill = - 51 45 6,7 |o 0 48,5E]| 1 10 47,5 | 4 4351 Whiteham Hill - - 151 46 15,4 |o 8 12,1W] 1-19 48,1 5 19,2 Cumner Hill - - | 51 44 155 |o 6 42,4W] 1 18 18,4 | § 13,2 Epwell - = - 52 4 19,8 |0 17 10,8W| 1 28 46,8 | 5 55,8 Corley Hill - = 51 50 2853 | o 9 39.9W] 1 21 15,9 | 5 2530 Arbury Hill = - - 52 13 26,6 |0 0 44,4W| 1 12 20,4 | 4 4953 Crouch Hill - - 52 2 58,7 |o 9g 35,0W| 1 21 11,6 | § 2457 Quainton - - 51°53 7.2 | 0 17-121 EB)" © 54 23,9 |~ 3 S75 Meridian of Greenwich. Longitude west of Greenwich. Names of the Stations. Latitude. In depres, Inte Wendover - - 51 45 6.4 ° 46 14 Bow Brickhill —- E 51 59 50,5 | 0 40 152 Kinsworth : -— 51 51 50,8 | o 31 59,9 Lillyhoe = Se remnenrnt neil Vn BA BaF sO eA Lidlington - - 52 1. 54;0 1 of 392 121.7 Trusler Hill - ° 51 59 48,0 | 0 34 50,5 Trigonometrical Survey. 657 Art. xxxi. Bearings of intersected Objects, from the Stations in the Series of 1797 and 1798, from ibe Parallels to the Meridians of Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon; and likewise their Distances from those Meridians. : “Meridian of Black Down. Distances Distances from merid.| from perp. Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. es Se At Moor Lynch. - sok tba Feet. ” Feet. Walton Windmill - é 7512 31 SE 51340 156858 Westonzoyland Steeple - - 63 42 36 SW 46928 154235 Middlezoy Steeple - - 31 48 21 SW 79339 148733 Chedzoy Steeple -" - -| 85 18 45 NW 90459 |» 163658 Higham Windmill - - 29-57 17 SE 58858 140880 Higham Steeple = - - -|. 22 §1 39 SE 62691 142196 Bridgewater Spire - - 88 39 25 SW 104717 161280 Somerton Steeple - - 47 454 SE 41197 134292 Burton Pynsent Obelisk + - 10 35 4S W 78428 “| 122688 At Dundry. — Puckle Steeple - - - 55 19 25 NE 26010: 292363 Westleigh Steeple - - 46 49 23 NE 23610 301818 Bristol Cathedral - - | 26.7 30 N-E 11836 279184: Redcliff Steeple = - - 33. 832 NE 9407 278007: Long Aston - - o 51 38 NW 21696 273385 Clifden Windmill - - - 952 50NE 19281 272172 Blaze Castle - - - | 149 16 NE [f° 20268 297874 Penpole Park Gazebo - -| 11 43 37 NW 28680 294155 Duke of Beaufort’s House, Stoke: 32 31 51 NE 651 294212 Durham Steeple -- - 63 28 33 NE 38049 289219 Knowle Steeple - - 13 41 30 NE 8112 314410 Mangotsfield Steeple - - 47 44 31 NE 13923 291677 Winterbown Steeple - - | 31 14 10 NE 7056 306569 Harfield Steeple - 2. 2a, 11 g NE 93478 292526 Leigh on Mendip ——- - 3359 55 SE 21483. 195794 Dundry Steeple - - -| 71 23 20S W 22831 259052 At Long Knoll. Doulting Spire - - -| 68 59 5u NW 9544. 182322 ' Frome Steeple - - 5 20 25 NW 52415 198272 At Farley Down. Devizes Steeple - - 7951 30 SE 129342. 24.5113, Cold Aston Steeple - - - 33 43 21 NW 44302 277983 658 The Account of a ‘ Meridian of Butterton Hill, Distances Bearings from the Parallels to the Mendin’ from mds aeeneal At Furland. Pa ate Feet. Feet. Hope’s Nose kak : 23 755 NE. 93759 18745 At St. Stephen’s. . a. Werrington Steeple - - - 29 37 23 NE 109839 92242 Boyton Steeple - - - 6.55 35. NW 112767 106733 St. Stephen’s Steeple - | - 45 55 4SE 110738 85968 North Petherwin Steeple - -. |. 49 15 49 NW 125044 98473 At Carraton Hill, Stokeclimsland Steeple - - 65.546 zNE 96381 49922 Launceston Steeple - - - 21,26 54 NE 108267 82689 Launceston Chapel - - 211413 NE 108513 | 82564 Meridian of St. Agnes Beacon. At Bodmin. St. Minvern Steeple - - 58 18 36 NW 79549 91845 St. Minvern Windmill - - 61 51 46 NW 90966 82260 At Trevose Head. St. Isey Steeple - - Gls! 212 SE 68456 | 74082 St. Merian Steeple - Sa- 57.59 32 SE 52096 82476 Art. xxxiv. Bearings of intersected Objects, from the Stations in the Series of 1799, from the Parallels to the Meridians of Dunnose and Greenwich; and likewise their Distances from. those Meridians. | Meridian of Dunnose. At Epwell. Warwick Steeple - - - 16 25 48 NW 87242 607508 St. Martin’s, Coventry 2.342 NW 69c28 | 653327 Soleyhul Spire = - - - 31.3 35 NV 128826 654971 At Arbury Hill. Dunchurch Windmill - - 23 55 48 Breadon Hill, Summer House - 37 an NW 20724 — 626734 t NW 26706 765038 Trigonometrical Survey. 659 ; DE Distances Distances Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. from merid.| from perp. os i OMe ake vir Feet Feet. Markfield Windmill - - 5 20 7 NW 18608 75581g Newnham Windmill - - = SG) 4a IN 2261 589244 At Corley Hill. Gazebo, Breadon Hill — - - 35 45 58 SW 188086 525408 At Crouch Hill. : Deddington Steeple ~ He 6 0. SE 28646 499771 Bloxhaina Spire - - 16 35 11 S W 39519 511110 Aynoe Steeple : - 49 26 2SE 11944 501goz Adderbury Spire - - - 37 26 59 SE 26213 509671 Farthingo Steeple - - - | 56 26 49 SE 6431 502904 At Arbury Hill. Round House, Edge Hills - 50 5 5 SW 57501 549724 Windmill, near the Round House 55 39 29 SW 58398 543286 At Brill. Wingrove Steeple - - 80375 NE 103826 454713 -“Hardwick Steeple —_- - - #816, 1 NE. 83299 454687 Luggersal Steeple - - 44 56 1 NE 35106 449401 Granborough Steeple . - 53) tg 30 NB 70782 474574 Bicester Steeple - - - 43 27 16 NW 6854 466560 Marq. Buckingham’s House, Wooton] 79 17 25 NE 43490 445984 Islip Steeple - - - 84 26 3S W 8944 439540 Woodstock Steeple 2 - 85 25 45 NW 35563 448393 Kidlington Spire - - 88 29 39 SW 13401 441989 Witchwood Beacon 5 - 89 11 34 SW 76971 444726 At Whiteborse Hill. Abingdon Spire - - 62 38 13 NE 19054 383037 Wallingtord Steeple - - 84 54 39 NE 17497 358560 Great Coxwell Windmill - - 25 45 11 NW 96959 376819 Drayton Steeple : _- - 67 28 o NE 24691 374055 Highworth Steeple - - 57 49 55 NW 116343 370003 Witney Spire - - = 14°14 57 NE 64.737 424386 Bampton Steeple - - - 4 36 29 NE 79056 408 334 Radley Steeple - - - 61-25 12 NE 12123 388578 Buckland Steeple - - - zo 812 NE 69616 388204 At Stow. > Stow on the Wold Steeple - 20 55 25 NW 118442 479166 At Broadway. » Sarsden Chapel - - - 52 29 “SSE 86195 469777 - Bourton Chapel - - - > 4 54 36 35 SE 125636 501076 Walford Spire - - - j 92 3842 SE 92704 507924 660 The Account of a Meridian of Greenwich. Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. Petsagveart wea a. -| from perp At Wendover. we Pin Feet. Feet Pitchcot Windmill —- - 19 11 59 NW 191077 149055 Ivinghoe Spire - - 45 44 37 NE 143127 131397 Quainton Steeple - - 3447 15 NW 205750 146203 Leighton Buzzard Spire - 2141 12NE 150616 160663 At Quainton. Southern Obelisk, Stow Park = - 22 1 36NW 227554 204673 Northern Obelisk, ditto - 21 50 48 NW 228505 207532 ’ At Kinsworth. Aylesbury Spire - - 77 56 58 SW 190234 126763 » Maulden Steeple - - 16 30 28NE 102962 202124 Harlington Steeple ~ - 16 12 37NE 110395 177730 Millbrook Steeple - - 3 ir 41-NE 117732 201645 Stretley Steeple =) ge 35 23 47 NE 99961 171044 © Sauldon Windmill - - 60 20 46 NW 178643 174431 At Bow Brickbill. Hanslope Spire - - 38 58 48 NW 185668 232843 North Crawley Steeple - 941 15NE | 145529 224901 Pavenham Spire - 22 15 49NE 122215 261812 St. Paul’s Spire, Bedford. - 43 9 11NE 104408 240631 Sharnbrook Spire = We- 19 21 54NE 123533 269816 Woburn Market-House = 73 52 37SE 139255 186978 Ridgemont Station - - 7z 28 11 NE 130927 196964 Wootton Spire - - 41 33 7NE 120265 225635 Cranfield Spire - - 30 44 22 NE 136284 215933 Husborne Crawley Steeple - 65 44 5StNE 136827 197064 Woburn Steeple - - on 22° FSS E 139373 187394 Souldrope Spire - - 16 32 49 NE 124861 279861 Windmill near Tharfield - 86 612NE 12577 199950 Tottenhoe Station - - 27 42 7SE 130412 150494. Chalgrave Steeple - ~ - 53 G11 SE 116215 164780 Keysoe Spire - - 31 17 59NE 95682 282155 Moulshoe Steeple - - 2 19 30 NW 152432 215608 Renhold Spire - - 44 56 16NE g1651 250385 Lidlington Windmill - 62 30 ONE 125855 203797 At Lillyboe. ‘ : Knotting- Green Elm ‘Tree - 16 17 56NW 117482 285139 Ravensden Steeple == - 7 25 0.2N 95142 255 304. Bow Brickhill Steeple - 73 20 18 NW 151490 19150 a4 Trigonometrical Survey. 661 Bearings from the Parallels to the Meridian. ; f Distances Distances rom merid. | from perps« ce oe Feet, Feet. Colmworth Spire ¢ «. - o 12 52zNW 84580 268984 Sundon Windmill - - 75 0 6SW 109032 164718 Silsoe Steeple - - 26 9 25 NW 95501- 194345 Flitton Steeple - - 38 20 32 NW 102831 194903 - Shillington Steeple - 749 43 NE 81919 188066 Westoning Steeple - ° 64 42 19 NW 113366 185143 Wrest-Garden Obelisk 2 26 26 83NW 94797 192652 _-Flitwick Steeple NG AER 57 11 27 NW 114694 | 191016 Ampthill Steeple - - ago 13 NW 109957 203041 St. Neot’s Steeple = - - 13 32 16NE 59630 273475 Pollux Hill Steeple - - 47 5 30NW 102236 188118 Art. xxxv. Latitudes and Longitudes of such Places, in the Series of 1797 and 1798, as have been referred to the Meridians of Black Down, Butterton Hill, and St. Agnes Beacon. Bs ty 8-2 Meridian of Black Down. . Names ofthe Objects: | tattude, | Hgnsinde fom | Longtnde wes of Greenwich 43, " Onna, O. 54, o 4 a m. 5S. Walton Windmill - 51 6 59.5 | 0 13 22,1W| 2 45 44.5 | IL 2,9 Westonzoyland Steeple - 51 6 33,8 | 0 12.12,9W] 2 44 35,3] 10 58,3 Middlezoy Steeple - 5M 85.5003 | © 20 3858 W) 253 0.2) FL 32,5 Chedzoy Steeple = - - GIseSo. FsB h-O-23039337 W| .2 55-5 Oba old) 4957 Higham Windmill | - 51 4 21,8 | 0 15 18,6W] 2 47 41,0 | 11 10,7 Higham Steeple - 51 4 34,6 | 0 16 18,5 W| 2 48 40,9 | 11 14,7 Bridgewater Spire - 51 7 40,7 |.0. 27. 16,3W!| 2 59 38,7 | 11 58,6 Somerton Steeple §t 3.1753 | O 10 42,7W) 2 43 551 | 10. 52,3 Burton Pynsent Obelisk. - 51 1 21,6 | O 20 22,7W] 2 52 45,1 | 11 31 Westleigh Steeple - 51 30 49.4 | 0 6 12,0E}] 2 26 10,4] 9 44,7 Bristol Cathedral - ST 27 Ome 93 O.27M). 2351 28,4 [eto\2d,9 Redcliff Steeple —- - 51 26 54,8 | 0 2 28,0W) 2 34 50,4 | 10 19,3 Long Aston - - 52 26..0,8 fo. 5 ig WP YO! 98 457° Y- re" 42,2 Clifden Windmill - 5h cheers One te W) 62 87 257 | 10. 20,7 Blaze Castle = - - ("| 5% gO 1o,@ | O° G 16,3 W| 2 37 41,7 |. 10 30,8 Penpole Gazebo - SY 293937 | O07 37 9 S457 16 39,6 Duke of Beanfort’s House, Stoke] 51 29 34,5 | 0 © 10,2H| 2 32 12,2 | 19 8,8 Durham Steeple - - 51 28 44,8 | 0 9 59,0E| 2 22.23,4 | g 29,5 Knowle Steeple - - BY- 325 4y7— Oo —2---7,9 WI ~2-34-30r3 -|- 10-18 - Mangotsfield Steeple - EL 206.9% ko. 3 392 2 28 43:2 | 9 54,8 Winterbown Steeple - So gn 636.4. p@OR 52,2H | 2 30. 3%,2 tol 251 Harfield Steeple - - 51 29 15,3 | 0 24 32,2W) 2 56 54,6 | 11 47,6 Leigh. Steeple on Mendip 51 13 24, ,0 5 36,3E]-2 26 46,1 9 4751 Dundry Steeple - bl 23 47,7 |O °5 58.8W]- 2 38 21,2 | £0) 33,4 MDCCC. "4.9 662 The Account of a Names of the Objects. Latitude. Doulting Spire = - - 5 Lit 1154 Devizes Steeple - 51 21 25,5 Frome Steeple - - 51 13 4759 Cold Aston -— - 51 26 53,9 Puckle Steeple - | 51 29 -16,z Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. Black Down. In degrees. ° 4 a“ ae a” © 2 29,3 E] .2 29 ggst! O 33 51,2 E|] 2 58 31,2 © 13 40,8 E] z 18 41,6 O11 38,0E} 2 20 44,4 | 0 649,6E{ 2 Meridian of Butterton Hill. 25 32,3 | es 9 42,2 Names of Objects. Latitude. Hope’s Nose, Torbay _- 50. 27 48; 5 Werrington Steeple 2 50 39 52,2 Boyton Steeple - - | 50 42 14,9 North Petherwin - 50.40 52,5 St. Stephen’s Steeple - 50 38 50,3 Stokeclimsland Steeple - 50 32 55,8 Launceston Steeple - 50 38 18,1 Launceston Castle - 50 38 16,8 Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. Butterton Hill. 26 44 E 28 19,4 W z9 6,1W 32 15,3 W 28 32,6W 24. 47,5 W 27 5441 W 27 57.9 W 000000000 In degrees. ° UJ ” 3 26 43,1 421 6,9 4 21 53,6 4 25 2,8 4 21 20,1 | 4°77 35:2 4 20 41,6 - 4 20 454 Meridian of St. Agnes Beacon. Names of Objects. _ Latitude. St. Minvern Steeple - 50 33 30,6 St. Minvern Windmill - 5° 31 5555 St. Isey Steeple - 50 30 36,0 St. Merian Steeple - 5° 31 5953 Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich, St. Agnes Beacon. 20 28,1 E 23 23.5 E 17 36,6 E 13 23,8 E oaooo0o°o In degrees. er | a 4 51 27,6 4 48 32,2 4 54 2051 4 58 31,9 In time. m. s. 19 25,8 19 14,3 19 3723 19 54st Art. xxxvi. Latitudes and Longitudes of such Places, in the Series of 1799, as have been referred to the Meridians of Dunnose and Greenwich.’ Meridian of Dunnose. Names of Objects. Latitude. ° ‘ a Warwick Steeple - 52 16 53,0 St. Martin’s Spire, Coventry | 52 24 25,4 Soleyhull Spire - - 52 2 30,4 Dunchurch Windmill —- 52 20 4,6 Longitude from | Longitude west of Greenwich. Dunnose. es 18 29,5 W 34 13,8 W 5 32.5 W 00000 4a 23 18,3 W)- In degrees. — In time. aA s. 19,6 6 03 9 353- 5 8,6 Meridian of Greenwich. Trigonometrical Survey. 663 a 5 ongitude Longitude west Of Greenwich. Manitecr Objects. Latitude, fibre Sunni2: Ue dastees, In time. Pius 7) oP os 7] ° 1 " m. S. Gazebo, Bardon Hill* - 52 42 47,6 |}o 7 12,2W| 1 18 48,2 5 15,2 Markfield Windmill - - | 5241 16,8 }o 5 1,0W| 1 16 37,0 5 6,5 Breadon Hill Building ¢ - 52 £36.70 40 50,7 W| 2-29 9557; 8 6,4 Newnham Windmill - 52 13 55.7 | 0 Oo 36,2E| 1 10 59,8 4.4359 Deddington Steeple - - | 51 59-13.9 |0 7 36,1 W| 1 Ig 12,1 5 16,8 Bloxham Spire - 34 520.5 6 sa 10: 2g G22) 1557 5 28,4 Aynoe Steeple - - 51 59 3552 | 0 3 10,2W! 1 14 46,2 4 59>% Adderbury Spire - | Se AGtsRo led O-" 339 Willi 27 30,7 5 10,6 Farthingo Steeple — - 51 59 4551 | O 1 42,4W) 1 13 18,4 2 a 4 Round House, Edge Hills 52 7 25,6 | 0 15 18,4 Wi 1 26 54,4 5 47,6 Round House Windmill - 5207114. 50 Th 3256 W) wm 27048; 5 48,6 Wingrove Steeple - gr 51 46,8 | 0 27 28,7E| 0 44 7,3 2 5655 Hardwick Steeple _—- - | 51 51 47,8 | 0 22 2,6E] 0 49 3354 3 18,2 Luggersal Steeple, Bucks FEeQOes7sawhinS eo n7.2 B | o2imhays Ai 2 Granborough Steeple - ~| 51 55 4:3 | 0 18 45,2E] 0 52 50,8 73154. Bicester Steeple = - = | 51 53 46,8 |}o 1: 48,9E] 1 9 47,1 4 39.1 Abingdon Spire - -| 510% 3,8 )0 5 -1,2W] 216 3752 S655 Wallingford Steeple - 51 36 2,4 10 4 36,2E|-1 6 59,8 4 2739 Great, Coxwell Windmill 51°38 59,8 | 0 25 32,4 W| 1 37 8,4 6 28,5 Drayton Steeple - - | 51 38 35 ° 30,1 W) 1 18 6,1 5 12,4 Highworth Steeple - 51 37 51,4 | 0 30 38,1 W) 1 42 14,1 6 48,9 Witney Spire - - 51 46 49,9 | 0 17 6,9 W] 1 28 42,9 5 54,8 Bampton Steeple - - | 51 44 11,2 | 0 20 51,9 W| 1 32 27,9 6 9,8 Radley Steeple L SE 0058.3 .0-0 3t 6754 WI) tag agin 6 54,2 Buckland Steeple - ~ | 5% 40/5953 (| O 18 21,1 W] i 29 57,811 115 59,8 Witchwood Beacon - 151 50 9,8 | O 20 21,6W| 1 31 57,6 6 7,8 Stow on the Wold - - | 51 55 46,9 | 0 31 23,6 W] 1 42 59,6 6 5159 Sarsden Chapel = - 51 54 16,4 | 0 22 49,9 W] 1 34 25,9 17,7 Bourton Chapel = = - | 51 59 22,5 | 0 33-2057 WI 1 44 56,7 6 59,8 Walford Spire - - 52 0.9830 a 26 12,5 W] 1:37 4855 6 31,2 Islip Steeple - - 51 49 20,7 | 0 2 21,9 W| 1 13 5759 4 55,8 Woodstock Steeple - 51 50 47,4 | 0 9g 24,5 Wl] 1 21 O 5 24 Kidlington Spire = -| 51 49 44,0 | 0 4 51,9W| 1 16 27,9 pane Longitude west of Greenwich. Names of Objects. Latitude. In degrees. enititat " “ . CS as para amt acai alana TMs... Ss Pitchcot Windmill - - | 51 52 5855 © 50 3555 3) 2254 Ivinghoe Spire - - 151 50 gpI O 37 555240 2 Sikes ‘Quainton Steeple - 51 52 28,7 | © 54 28,0 3.3728 Southern Obelisk, Stow Park | 52 2 2,2 b O 27,5 f 4 ise Northern Obelisk, ditto - 50 2 30,2 1 © 42,9 | 4, 2,8 * In page 658, this is, by mistake, called Breadon Hill Summer House. + In page 659, this building is called Gazebo. 4.Q 2 664, Names of Objects. Leighton Buzzard Spire Aylesbury Spire - Hanslope Spire - - North Crawley Spire - Pavenham Spire - St. Paul’s Spire, Bedford Sharnbrook Spire - Woburn Market-House Woburn Steeple - Ridgemont Station - Wootton Steeple - Cranfield Spire - Husborne Crawley Steeple Souldrope Spire - Windmill near Tharfield Tottenhoe Station - Chalgrave Steeple - Keysoe Spire - Moulshoe Steeple Renhold Spire - Lidlington Windmill - Maulden Steeple - Harlington Steeple = Millbrook Steeple - Stretley Steeple - Sauldon Windmill - Knotting-Green Elm Tree Ravensden Steeple - Bow Brickhill Steeple Colmworth Spire - Sundon Windmill = Silsoe Steeple -. Flitton Steeple - Shillington Steeple - Westoning Steeple = - Wrest-Garden Obelisk ’ Flitwick Steeple 7 Ampthill Steeple —- St. Neot’s Steeple - Pollux Hill Steeple ~ eee a The Account of a Latitude. — 2 5 I - 52 In degrees, G& 0.0 © O«8 0-'O'O"0"0' 00" 6" 0' O06" 0-0 6'0 OO 0 00 0 0 O'0 000 06 OC Os Longitude west of Grecnwich, In time. He NED EE DE NORD HNN NDE NNONDHHRNNKHNHKHKHODDHE Ss. 39,6 23,2 17,2 3495 8 529 11,2 279 2Z aN See af Eeotu “SI coo © Trigonometrical Survey. 665 Arr. xxxvit, Latitudes and Longitudes of some remarkable Places, not contained in the preceding Tables. St. Nicholas’s or Drake’s Island, in Plymouth Sound. _ The bearing of Kit Hill, from the meridian of Butterton, is 67° 12’ 12”, and the angle between it and the flagstaff on Drake’s Island, 41° 40 8”; therefore, the bearing of the latter from the meridian is 71° 7’ 40”; consequently, its distance from the meridian is 60591 feet, and from the perpendicular 20692 feet, which respectively subtend 9’ 53'’6, and 3' 24,5. These, with the latitude and longitude of Butterton, 50° 24/ 46,3 and 3° 52’ 47",5, give 50° 21’ 21",1 for the latitude, and 4° 8’ 17,9 for the longitude, of the flagstaff on Drake’s Island. The latitude and longitude of this spot was determined by Mr. Bay ey, in the year 1792. The observations for the former were as follows : BBO 1°90" 24 'SBVPEE. 50 21 90,5 ditto. 50 21 31 ~~ ditto. 50 21 29) a@ Aquilz. 50 21 26,5 « Ophiuchi. 50 21 55 ©’suu. The mean of these is 50°21'28", 5. The place chosen by Mr. Bay ey, as I have been lately in- formed, was a few feet northward of the staff; therefore, 7”, 4, may be taken for the true difference between our determinations, The longitude of Mr. BayLey’s. station, found by the moon’s transit, was 4° 18’ 52"; but* the longitude deduced from the recent operations, is 4° 8’17”,9; there is, therefore, a difference: of 10’ 34,1 between the two determinations. 666 The Account of a St. Andrew’s or the Old Church, at Plymouth. The angle at Butterton, between the Old Church tower and Kit Hill, is 37° 45' 5,2; its bearing, therefore, south-west from — the meridian, is 75° 1’ 56”; consequently, its distance from the meridian is 57505 feet, and from the perpendicular 1 5374 feet. These Buses ie subtend 9! 24)", and 9! go",1: hence, its ati- tude becomes 50° 22’ 19”,6, and longitude 4° 7’ 31”, hes 16% 3o’,1 in time, west of Greenwich. As it is of very great importance that the truths of the con- clusions given in this Work should receive support, wherever I can find it, I think it right to mention the result of his Excellency the Count de Brunu’s endeavours to ascertain the longitude of Plymouth, by means of chronometers.. The fol- lowing is a copy of his communication, made in the year 1795- Journey from Plymouth to London. Green Timekeeper. June 8th, Mr. Mupce’s clock* at Plymouth, fast for mean time 0” 32',15 1783. "1 Timekeeper faster than Mr. Mupe#’s clock - 0 25,6 bye { Timekeeper slower than London clock - 14 29 94 40+ 4 London clock slow for mean time - - © 36.5 Difference of longitude - 16 3,65 Blue Timekeeper. June 8th, Mr, Mupcs’s clock at Plymouth, fast for mean time 0” 32°,15 | Timekeeper faster than Mr. Mupcsx’s clock - 0 37,44 byte { Timekeeper slower than London clock - 14 17,2 . {London clock slow for mean time - - © 3655 Difference of longitude - 16 3425 Mean difference - - 16 3355 The longitude of St. Paul’s, west of Greenwich, is 23°; 1 in * Itis, perhaps, right to observe, that Mr. T. Mupce’s transit, at Pisuouti. was made by the late Mr. Brrp, and properly set up between stone pillars. The clock, the entire work of his own hands, was a most excellent one. ~ Trigonometrical Survey. 667 time; and Mr. DutTon’s house in Fleet-street is about 2° west of St. Paul’s ;* wherefore, its longitude west of Greenwich is 25°: consequently, 16" 95,55 + 25° = 16" 28,55, is the dif- ference of longitude between Greenwich and Plymouth, as shewn by the timekeepers. Now the meridian of Mr. Mupce’s transit-room, at Plymouth, passed only 35 feet to the eastward of the centre of St. Andrew’s Tower, his northern meridian mark being on the church itself; therefore, the longitude of the church and transit-room may be considered the same. From the survey, we find it to be 16" 30°,1; and, from Count Bruut’s determination, making a just allowance for the difference of longitude between the late Mr. DuttTon’s house and Greenwich, 16™ 28°,5. It is left for the public, and this learned Society in parti- cular, to determine how far the near agreement of these several methods, tends to corroborate the assertion I have advanced, of the dependence which may be placed on the deductions drawn from the observations made at Beachy Head and Dunnose. If there had been-only one watch employed on the occasion, the result would not have been so satisfactory as the circumstance of two being used seems to make it. As the occasion calls for the remark, before I dismiss this article, I must observe, that the highest advantages would accrue to geography, were the ideas of the Astronomer Royal carried into execution, (and which I shall endeavour to do at some future period,) respecting the discovery of the difference of longitude between Greenwich and some very remote point on the western side of the island, (St. David’s Head for instance,) by means of timekeepers, * According to Horwoop’s Mapof London, the distance from the centre of St. Paul’s to Bolt Court, at the corner of which Mr. Durron’s house is situated, is 31 chains. 668 _ The Account of a carried backwards and forwards in the mail coaches. If this excellent scheme were executed, and the watches employed equal to the best now made, it is probable that the true diffe- rence of longitude would shortly be determined. The geodetical situation of St. David’s Head will, ere long, be ascertained from a prosecution of the survey : a knowledge, therefore, of its true longitude would be attended with eminent advantages. Lizard Light- Houses. The light-houses on this head-land were observed from Per- tinney and Karnbonellis. At the latter, Pertinney bears 74, 22' 41" south-west, from the parallel to the meridian of St. Agnes; and, as the angle between the western light-house and Pertinney is 78° 40! 5”, it follows, that the bearing of the light- house from the said parallel is 4° 17’ 24/’ south-east. Computing with this angle and the distance from Karnbonellis to the light- house, we get 3344, feet, and 126499 feet, for the distances of that object from the meridian and perpendicular of St. Agnes: therefore, admitting the length of the degree in the meridian, in the middle point between St. Agnes and, the light-house, to be 60850 fathoms, and 61182 for the length of a degree of a great circle perpendicular to it, we get 20’ 47,4, and g2”,8, for the small arcs which those spaces respectively subtend. These data, with the latitude and longitude of St. Agnes, 50° 18’ - 27”, and 5° 11' 55”57, give the latitude of the light-house= 40° 57' 44’, and longitude west of Greenwich 5 Ly 4", 8, in time, 207 4.45,3. This light-house was also observed from the station on Karnminnis. The triangle resulting from that observation, together with the angle at Karnbonellis, is Trigonometrical Survey. 669 Karnminnis ay erigde 946" Karnbonellis - - 98 1 go Western Light-house 37 48 44; which gives 81342 feet, for the distance between the station Karnbonellis and the Light-house. This distance is said, in the Philosophical Trans- actions for 1797, p. 501, to be 81948 feet, which differs only 6 feet from the above determination ; but it is. probable the dis- tance first given is most correct, as the two light-houses appear- ing nearly in the same line at Karnminnis, was the means of preventing us from clearly distinguishing the apex of either, and it was principally on this account that we preferred the ob- _ servation made at Pertinney. The agreement however proves, hat no inconsistency can be found to obtain with respect to the data before given, for settling the situation of this important headland. In the Philosophical eiheapcons for 1797, page 502, it is: mentioned, that the distance from the spot where the late Mr.. BraDLEy made his observations, to the place where his meridian mark was fixed, was 800 feet. But there appears to be some in- consistency in this particular; as Mr. BRADLEy’s own words, in. an extract of a letter now before me, are, zt was just 480 feet. Adding to this, 24, feet, the distance between the place of the meridian mark and the line joining the centre of the light- houses, we get the distance of the point O, or the place of the _ Observatory, (see Phil. Trans. 1797, p. 502,) from the line join- ing the light-houses W, E, = 504 feet; a space corresponding to 5” of latitude, nearly ; therefore, from the trigonometrical. operations, we get, ay Se ' Pees | a as be i * is Pe ve longitude £of Mr. BRADLEY’S station. MDCCC. 4R 670 The Account of a Mr. BraDLey’s observations for finding the latitude, were made with a quadrant of one foot radius, the workmanship of Mr. Birp; they were as follows. Nine meridional altitudes of the sun’s limb, the extreme results of which were 49° 57 27",5 and 49 57' 44’, gave for the latitude of the Obser- i vatory . < 49° 57 35" Six meridional observations of the Pole Star be- | -low the Pole, the extreme results of which were 49° 57' 35" and 49° 57' 20,4, gave for the la- titude ~ - - - 49 57 23,2 Thirteen observations of Arcturus, « Coronz Bo- | realis, and « Serpentis, the extreme results of which were 49° 57! 54,7 and 49° 57’ 2",7, gave for the latitude - - - 49 57 29 Fifteen observations of «, @, » Draconis, the ex- treme results of which were 49° 57‘ 22”,2 and 49° 57°27, gave for the latitude - AQ 57 33 The mean of which is - 49 57 30 According to the trigonometrical operations, the latitude is 49° 57’ 44’; there is, therefore, a difference of 14’ between the results ; a quantity so large as justly to excite surprise, if it were not generally understood, that much dependance cannot be placed on observations made with an astronomical quadrant precisely similar to that made use of by Mr. Braptey. The extreme results in the above, differ so widely as to authorise the truth of the supposition on this occasion. — The longitude of the Lizard was determined by the transit of Venus, Sun’s eclipse, transit of the Moon, and two emersions Trigonometrical Survey. 671 of Jupiter’s first satellite, as particularly set forth in the Preface to the Nautical Ephemeris of 1791. The conclusions were as follows: Four transits of ou Moon, lau by Mr. xs gave for the longitude - - 20" 30 ,6 Two emersions of Jupiter’s first satellite, calculated by ditto : ‘ i 4 21 14 65 {Doctor MASKELYNE 20 57 ,O ee of Venus, calculated by¢ Mr. WiTcHELL - 20 56 ,5 racer - dyi2© §7is0 Mr. WITCHELL = 20 44 55 Mr. SEJOUR = 20 45 51 Mr. EuLER - 20 59 ,0 Mr. LEXxEL - 20 51,0 Sun’s eclipse, calculated by | Mean of the whole - 20 52 ,12 From the trigonometrical operations, we find the longitude in time to be 20” 4,4°,3 ; there is, therefore, a difference of 7°,82 between these different determinations: this is, probably, as near as we could have expected to find it; yet it can scarcely be supposed, that of this difference, more than 2° can be laid to the account of the survey. In the Philosophical Transactions for 1797, p. 502, it is ob- served, that angles were taken at the Lizard Light-house and Naval Signal-Staff, to determine the situation of the Poznt it- self. This Point, marked P in the diagram, makes an angle of 2° 23’ 16” S W, with the parallel to the meridian of St. Agnes at the station on Karnbonellis, and is therefore 636,6 feet from that meridian, and 126394, feet from the perpendicular; therefore 49° 57' 40,6 is the latitude . , and 5 11 46 the longitude es ae 4R 2 679 The Account of a Scilly Islands... To determine the distances of the objects in these islands, from the stations near the Land’s End, with sufficient accuracy, proper corrections were made for reducing the horizontal angles to those formed by the chords. On the present occasion, it will be right to use the horizontal, and not the chord angles ;' the distances from the meridians, and from their perpendiculars, being computed on the supposition of the earth’s surface being a plane, which, within the limits of our fixed meridians, may be considered as true. The angles for finding the distances of these objects are given in the Philosophical Transactions for 1797, p. 503; from whence, and the data contained in this Work, we get the bearing of the Day-mark in the Island of | St. Buryan 75° 44/ 52" SW cme Pertinney , 71 14 22 SW St. Martin’s from - ether eo os Ww which, combined with the distances of the stations from the meridian of St. Agnes, give 2G Ioe ee for the distance of the Day-mark from the 246804, «ae . 246821 meridian of St. Agnes ; and 122409 122410 pfeet, for the distance of it sian the perpendiaulas, 1224.14, The mean of the first is 246809 feet, and the mean of the last 122411 feet; but the latter becomes 122419, because a line drawn from the Day-mark, perpendicular to the meridian of St. Agnes, cuts that meridian eight feet below the parallel. Again, we get the bearing of the Windmill - - - in the Island of St. f Povagres, - 65°32' 307 SW the Flagstaff of the Fort Mary, from Pertinney - 6653 5 SW Trigonometrical Survey. 673 from whence, after a similar correction with that just made, we find the distance of _ the Windmill 256304 | feet from. the f 143597 | feet from the perpendicular of the Flagstaff 260152 f. meridian, and | 140876 f . St. Agnes. From the same page, and the data fonnhed in this work, we'also find the bearing of . St. Agnes Light-fSennen - 68°6' 54'°S W House from .. |St. Buryan, 69 § 56 SW; which gives 265865 | | 265879 Veet, for the distance from ae meridian, and Fas oa fleet for the distance from the perpendicular of St. Agnes. The mean of the first is 265872 feet, and the mean of the last, when corrected, 149139 feet. With the above data, and also the latitude and longitude of St. Vd we get - Day-mark in St..Martin’s. ~ ' 49°58’ 2",9 Windmill, St. Mary’s —- - 49:54 3257 ) Flagstaff, ditto.» -. - 49°54 59.1 _ St. Agnes pis Eiouse - - 49.53 36,8 the labile of - In Time. _¢ 6° 14' 38",8 , 24™58°,6 and longitude west J’ Windmill 5 ~~ 3,2: ge thecmieric 6 416 58737) 25% <7 “9 from St. Agnes. | Flagstaff 16 2,7. ‘wich. fers, G17; S7 od 25 Ul. oD Light House 1 7 27; 7 4 6 19234 25 20 55 Dayemark _ 1° 2’ 43751 sd is the Requisite Tables, published By order of the Board of Longitude, the lati- tude of the Scilly Lights is said to be 49" 56’0", and longitude 6° 460". The latitude, Acordes to the survey, is 49° 53' 36,8, and longitude 6° 19'23°,4. An error of 2' 23” in the latitude, may not perhaps be considered extraordinary; but how, in a maritime Poewleoe like our own, where chronometers are in such constant use, so great an error-as 26’ 37" (1™ 46° in time) in the longitude, should have remained undetected, excepting by one person, is surprising. J. Huppart, Esq. visited the Scilly Isles, having with him a watch made by Arnotp, and obtained his time at that spot in the island of St. Mary where the body of Sir Ctoupstey SHovEL is said to have been thrown ashore, by means of equal altitudes of the Sun’s limb; he then found, comparing his time with that shewn by the watch, that ot 2 5™ 18° was the difference between the meridians of Greenwich and this spot in St. Mary’s. Now St. Agnes Light-house is about 2’ of adegree west of the place to which Mr. Huppart alludes ; therefore, 25/18” + 8” ='25'26" is the longitude of St. Agnes, through these means; which differs only 4',5 in time from that found by the survey. 674, The Account of a The Observatory of bis Grace the Duke of Matorover, at Blenheim. The staff erected over the quadrant, was observed from White Horse Hill and Whiteham Hill. At the former station, the latter makes an angle of 36° 30' 13”,5, with the parallel to the meridian of Dunnose. The staff, therefore, bears from the parallel 25° 59’ 29”,75 NE.; consequently, its distance from the meridian of Dunnose is 36540 feet, and from the perpendicular 4,464.58 feet. These respectively subtend 5’ 58’,3, and 1°13’21”,4; therefore, the latitude of the Observatory is 51° 50’ 28”,3, and its longitude 9’ 39”,9 from Dunnose: but 1°11’ 36” is the longitude of that station; therefore, 1° 21’ 15”,9, or 5’ 25,2 in time, is the longitude of the Observatory west from Greenwich. As the meridian of Dunnose passes at no great distance from that of Blenheim, I have deduced the latitude and longitude from the former, to avoid the errors which creep in, when computa- tions are carried on from remote meridians. It may be worth while, however, to show that the extent of those errors would not be great, were the meridian of Dunnose neglected, and - the Observatory at Blenheim referred to the meridian of Greenwich, _ The distance of White Horse Hill from the meridian of Green- wich is found to be 356050 feet, and from. its perpendicular 39425 feet; the bearing of Nuffield, from the parallel at that station, being 89° 59’ 27” SE. Blenheim will, therefore, be found to bear 26° 55'95” NE from the parallel at White Horse Hill; consequently, its distance from the meridian of Greenwich is 307204, feet, and from its perpendicular 135569 feet. These give the arcs 50’ 19”,4, and 22’ 16”,1; from. whence we get 51° 50’ 28,1 for the latitude, and 1° 21’ 16” for the longitude, Trigonometrical Survey. 675 of the Observatory west of Greenwich. Either of these deter- minations may be taken for the true result, but I shall prefer 2 Sa Being favoured by his Grace with the latitude and longitude derived from astronomical observations, we have the following comparisons : ; Degrees. Time. “2, 4. f observed 51°50! 24,9 Longitude west {1° 21’ 6",0 5™ 24%,4 Tatiride Sa SI 50 28 51 from Greenwich. 1 211559 5 25 51 ' Observatory at Oxford. The angle at the station on Shotover, between the Atlas on the top of the Observatory and the parallel to the meridian of Dunnose, is 79° 50’ 51”,75 N W: therefore, its distance from the meridian is 14,719 feet, and from the perpendicular 416985 feet. The figure representing Atlas is 33 3 feet due east of the Quadrant Room; consequently, no correction will be required in the computed latitude. The space 14719 feet subtends an arc = 2’ 24"’,3, and 416985 feet an arc of 1° 8’ 30’,8._ These data, with the latitude and longitude of Dunnose, give 51° 45’ 38” for the latitude, and 1° 15’ 29”,2 for the longitude, of the Obser- vatory. As in the former case, with respect to Blenheim, so in the present instance, it is immaterial whether the calculations be carried on from the meridian of Greenwich or that of Dun- nose, as differences of only o”,1 in both the latitude and longitude are found in the results. The latitude and longitude of this Observatory are given in the Requisite Tables; the first is 51° 45’ 38”, and the last 1° 15' 30", or 5™ 2° in time. Doctor Hornsspy, however, has furnished me with what he conceives to be more accurate 676 The Account of a determinations ; from which, and the above, we have the follow- ing comparisons : : Degrees. Time. Latitide “(oad fy do ka eee a a 2 -L1 15 29 52 5 ia %1s9 I conclude this article with expressing an opinion, that the coincidence between the computed and, no doubt, accurately observed longitude of this Observatory, affords strong reason for supposing, that the operations at Beachy Head and Dunnose, in 1794, for finding the length of a degree of a great circle perpendicular to the meridian on the earth’s surface, were made with the required accuracy. SECTION THIRD. Trigonometrical Surveys of the Northern and Western Parts of Kent, the County of Essex, and Parts of the. adjoining Counties, Suffolk and Hertford, executed in the Years 1798 and 1799. (See Plate XXXII. ) It will be convenient to treat of the operations carried on in the north of Kent and Essex, before we speak of those executed in the western parts of the former county. In a former article I have observed, that from the old station at Wrotham, (General Roy’s,) the view towards the north is ob- structed, and also that it became necessary to select a new one: this station was found to be 205,5 feet from the other; the dis- tance was accurately measured, and afterwards the. angle taken at the old station, between the staff on Severndroog Tower, Trigonometrical Survey. . 674 Shooters Hill, and the one newly chosen; this angle subtended 94 19' 0",5. The distance from Severndroog Tower to the old station at Wrotham, is 79960 feet. But, it must be observed, this dis- tance is not precisely the same as that given by General Roy, because an allowance is made for the error in the reduction of the bases, in the surveys of 1787 and 1788. With the distances 79960 feet and 20,5 feet, and the included angle, 94° 19’ 0”,5, we find the distance of the Flag-staff on Severndroog Tower, from the new station = 79944, feet; with this distance, a part of the AG triangles have their sides computed. ART. XXXVIII. ‘Principal Triangles. Names of stations. Observed angles. } / Distances of the stations. Onn Feet Wrotham - - 62 54 33 ( 45578 Gravesend - - 82 spi2trloi »>Gravesend = - Severndroog Tower | 71762 Gravesend : - 95 53 59 44886 Langdon Hill sa 8y i, ma) 54 47 125 »p Langdon Hill - 7 Severndroog Tower. 88470 Gravesend - - BAe BIRR 64076 Hadleigh Steeple - ALT eaten Steeple - Langdon Hill - - 37171 Gravesend - -- 3° 24 19—21 44839 Hadleigh F 7 it 46 233 pHalstow Steeple - { 34004, Halstow = - x 107 49. 5— 6 a ee 44 27959057 wie ) ; Gravesend. oh Rte 31 48 bt aoe Haltom ne LAG2! x. \eeplegth g Or Mea co. { Gadshill’ ; , Halstow - ere ‘ 59 18 6 — { 49409 Hadleigh Steeple - 49 13 ee 3] }shep ey ~ Mtoe 64387" Sheppey Isle - - 31 28 24 —23 MDCCC. 4.8 678 | The Account of a The distances of Gadshill from Halstow, and from Halstow to the Isle of Sheppey, in the following triangle, viz. Halstow 128 34 28 Sheppey 18 18 3 Gadsbill give the distances between Gadshill and the station in the Isle of Sheppey 70687 and 70685 feet: the mean, 70686 feet, may be taken for the true distance. , Names of stations. Observed Distances. angles. ’ 4 of & ; Hadleigh - - 38 43 29 ; 27596 Southend - - 11g 20 5] pSouthend = - - - Sheppey | - 46204 To find the distance between Langdon Hill and the spindle of the weather-cock on Rayleigh Steeple, we have the following quadrilateral. Langdon Hill 122° 2! 46" Gravesend © 64 56 14 Halstow © III 20 14 ne Rayleigh - 61 40 46 360 0 o,which gives the distance from the centre of Rayleigh Steeple to the staff on Langdon Hill = 44131 feet; but the point on the top - of Rayleigh Tower, over which the instrument was placed, was just 7 feet farther from , Langdon Hill than the: spindle; therefore, 44131 -+ 7 = 44138 feet, is the distance between Langdon Hill and the station on the steeple.—The angles in the following tri- angles, Hadleigh - 134° 11' 55,” Sheppey 16 26 30 Langdon Hill Langdon Hill 4D 8 ake Sheppey - 27 4 46 Rayleigh give the distance of a. the Spindle on Rayleigh Tower from ; roa Hill re er 2 1 rec From the preceding quadrilateral, the distance between the spindle on Rayleigh’ Tower and the station on Langdon Hill, was found = 44131 feet, which is the same as the other determination. : Ww 7&8 ‘ Trigonometrical Survey. 679, Names of stations, 1 Observed’ Distances, angles. OF ie i E Feet Halstow + eRe? 2 95 46 § \ spindle c } ; 49413 Sheppey - - | 42 6 39 73313 Rayleigh Tower Spindle Halstow - - - 35 18 . 46820 Hadleigh 3 7 - ag--gtig i Prittlewell = - - j 27206 Prittlewell Steeple i as Se i Prittlewell - - j qoez3 Sheppey = hatte 55 24 34 51243 Prittlewell Halstow —s - - 73 2 71201 Shenneae fos = 6% ‘ Canewden = - - ; 74461 Canewden Steeple Rayleigh - - - G2 5, tO 31438 Prittlewell = - Spree | 7341 30 angyees " y 26189 Canewden Hadleigh = - Saas 52 52 24 51846 Halstow - - - | 86 10 13 age te ” } 34060 Flagstaff of the Garrison, . _ Sheerness Severndroog Tower - - 17 48 23 . 404.23 Gravesend = - - 20 22 40 = easeo/ See eons 35498 Purfleet Cliff - - -~ |I4t 48 57 . 180 0 Oo Ragliee |) - ee 97 7 27 ; 2 47514 Langdon Hill - - 43 18 2 aay I 68746 Danbury Spire Severndroog Tower = - - | 26 24 33. = 103659 Langdon Hill - - . 95 25 0 tenn j A ; 46312 Frierning Steeple - - 58 10 27 | Langdon Hill - 2 88 14. 19 : 46314 Frierning = tie = 44 13 19 | -Frierning - * Rayleigh : 63270 45 2 680 . The Account of a. Mean distance from Langdon Hill to Frierning Steeple 46313 feet. Observed Distances, angles. on Feet. Frierning etn mee 92 15---6 49020 Langdon Hill - - 45 26 17 | Danbury ' bi { 68748 Danbury Steeple Langdon Hill - - 24 297-23 p 83902 Rayleigh == - |132 52 23 } Signal aa a { 47408 Signal Staff, Shoehune ness Triptree, old station - - | 47 850 Rayleigh - = - | 73 45,24 Frierning i ; Triptree, old station, from | roe Rewer iq re th x: 43 Triptree - - - 31 59 21 Danbury - ie 124 20 48 Rayleigh Danbury Spire from Triptree Heath 36000 Triptree, old station - Ico 28 19 Tillingham Steeple - - | 30 14 40 Danbury. Spire Titngham fom Peewee - = | stage Tillingham = - 84 52 34 | 42469 Peldon - - - 62 39 36| -Peldon - - Danbury ene - Tillingham - - - 148 58. Peldon - 83 42 Flagstaff on St. Osytb ine Peldon - - = 20°49 Thorp - - | 32 47 af Flagstaff, St. Osyth Priory - Peldon - - - ; { Thorp - - ~ Stoke Steeple Peldon = - - 71 48 20 43475 Great Tey - - - {75 51 12 | pGreat Tey - - Danbury - - . 77204 Trigonometrical Survey. 681 Names of the Stations. Observed __ Distances, angles. - PM A 4: 1 6 Feet. ‘ Peldon - - - P AGL TAN Z a { 3941* Great Tey = - - -| 9056 9 } Stoke hi 4 46182 : Stoke From a former triangle, the distance between Peldon and Stoke Steeple was found to be 63931 feet; wherefore, 63936 feet, the mean, may be taken for the true distance. Thorp - - z 20481 Little Bentley - - Little Bentley - Dover-Court-. - - 42981 Thorp - - - 41 12 53 Little Bentley - - {123 30 18 | -Little Bentley - Peldon - = = ; 51205 Tillingham - - g6 57 20 28924 Danbury Spire - - 61 46 57 } West 4 ae a { 79173 West. Mersea , : Rayleigh == Be - (| 54 27 44 96701 West Mersea - - 29 13. © | -West Mersea - Danbury - - - ie : 79170 nS ERR 1 NAR 2 AN i en a tera mt oe a am Great Tey - - 52 11 44 . Stoke - - - A5 12 57 Staircase, St. Mary’s Steeple, Col- chester St. Mary’s Steeple from Stoke —— = = - 36796- Little Bromley - - GA Likes 44356 Stoke - - - 47 58 26 | Little Bromley —- “ St. Mary’s, Colchester - 33706 Dover Court - os 18 58 I9 } . . 38946 Stoke . 2 z 1453 50 Tattingstone - fn { e260 Tattingstone j Thorp 5 a - - 27 ea 49 . o6g0 StoRacte Pre : Baler i }Tattingstone - { ed Tatting stone ne ee eee Dover Court - - 50 26 54 J 1651 Rushmere - ° -" 1538,.25 120 }Palkenham i { Som Falkenbam Steeple The distance from Dover Court Steeple to Stoke Steeple is 84425 feet, and from Rush- mere Steeple to Stoke Steeple 75955 feet ; the included angle at Dover Court Steeple is 62° 38°20". These give the distance of Dover Court Steeple from Rushmere, 50921 feet. 682 - The Account of a Names of Stations, Observed Distances. ‘ _ angles. 4 D c t ; ° t nf a Ae over Cour - - 43 40 51 . m 39949 Rusienes , 5 Be Tattingstone 35232 Tatting stone Dover Court = = sal fig 13 a Rushmere a ok “ 3 30 1 Woodbridge - ; Woodbridge Steeple - =| 57°397 Falkenham~ - er 41 25 50 : 33761 Rushmere - - | 58 0 10 Bvondbrmge : } 26342* Woodbridge : Falkenham - - - 48 42 0 2 45013 Woodbridge - - - 83 10 oO } Butley : } 34058 Butley Steeple ’ Falkenham - - - 21 58 1 . 60589 Buoy i m ” ~ 1516 14159 1 orford Light House - } 25207 Orford Light Hous . Rushmere_ = : - 62 45 1 - 29238 Woodbridge = = - = | 63 30 1-0 + ottey ” ; | 2g044 Otley Steeple - - - Rushmere - = = | 40 25 30 i “rover. Otley - = - - | 46 2570 Hime) ® ki } 18988 Henley Steeple emia O51. 923° 180 0 0 Dover Court - = - 12 43 40 |?) Obelisk 4 ae 26766 ‘i Rushmere —« - - | 13 22 10 | 4 i (25503), Obelisk, Woolverstone Park Rushmere - -" - 61 35 58 28984 Copdock Steeple - - 153 5 10 | pCopdock - - tho Vaca Obelisk a 28057 Rushmere - = - 85 25 oO a 21209 Copdock = - + - | 37 46 © i eal ae 34520 Henley = - - 56 49 oO | ea Trigonometrical Survey. 683 Names of Stations. Observed Distances, " angles, H | 7 . 4 ‘ 4 enley - - > 58 32 42—40 Copdock = - - 74. 30 LI—10 | Naughton y x Naughton Steeple - - | 46 $7 11=10 Naughton - - 7h Al 2 Stoke - p - | 45 58 58 Lavenham - Lavenham Steeple - EQ) 37 mao i ie tao ee A oh Lavenham - - - 67 48 30 30837 Stoke Pi asters - | 44 59 10 panes os } 4 Bulmer Steeple 67 12 20 poceulere sey sz te ss) Glemsford - 25746 Bulmer - - = 27086 Glemsford Steeple Lavenham - - 18 22 0 Bulmer - - - |142 15 20 To pplesfield Lavenham - - - 51 36 4o Stoke - = SASSO. (SVS pe Steeple Stoke - + - 50 4 48 Great Tey - - - 56 15 56 Twinestead Frierning a - 156 42 10, Danbury > VP TS gO FO Souibweald Steeple Danbury = - - 1g1 18 36 Triptree, old Station - - | 12 © 34 Gallywood Common. =) - 0 oho O Triptree, old Station = 37 41 44 Gallywood =- = aay eae Plesbley Steeple Di Danbury - - es Gallywood - - 3 Plesbley Gallywood - - 15 45 30 Pleshley - - |114°49 0 High Easter Steeple 684 The Account of a = eee Names of stations. Observed } Distancessisei2 to somevl angles. [enema Feet. Danbury = : neg Fe Scop Plushies iS 3 _ AZ £39 | } Hatfield Broad Oak - tbh 39058 Hatfield Broad Oak Steeple vi Danbury - - - 20 nc. High Easter - - 29 43 54 }rhaxted - - { 101330 Thaxted Spire 53429 Hatfield Broad Oak - 54.20 51 Pleshley - - 39.25 oO } Beauchamp Roding - { 24853: Beauchamp Roding Spire 31806 The angle observed from the station on Danbury Steeple, between Hatfield Broad Oak and Thaxted, was 30° 33’ 40”; this, with the including sides, 85094 and 101330 feet, gives the following triangle : Danbury - 302133 40" Hatfield Broad Oak g2 24 0 Thaxted - 57. 2 20,which gives the distance between Thaxted and Hatfield Broad Oak = 51566 feet. Danbury - - - 27 24 19 sabe Peldon = - - 118 2 28 } Stoke : = 6395" Stoke Again, the angle observed at Danbury, between Thaxted and Stoke was 66° 43 3; this, with the sides which form it, ra pee and Thaxted, Danbury and she gives the following triangle: Danbury - 66° 43' 8" Stoke - OMNAB 25116 a oat Thaxted oh Gar er 36, from atl we find 124430 mira for the dis. tance from Thaxted to Stoke. The angle at Lavenham Steeple, between Stoke and Thaxted, was likewise observed, , and found to be 89° 10’ 30", which, with the distances of these latter. stations, from Lavenham, 48039 and 124430 feet, gives Lavenham = - 89° 10' 30” Pi H wet 09 a Ss Stoke = = 6817.4 oben’ ae est Thaxted - 22 42) 80, from which we find 11 5480 feet to be e the distance from Thaxted Spire to Lavenham Steeple. " | : dat ‘"q ; i 4 A , +. Vi Trigonometrical Survey. 685 The angle at Danbury, between Southweald and Hatfield Broad Oak, was found to be 54° 44 30". The distances from Danbury to Southweald and Hatfield Broad Oak have been already found, the former being 77622 feet, and the latter 85096 feet ; from these we get the triangle, Danbury” - 54° 44! 30" Southweald - 67 42 5 Hatfield Broad Oak 57 33 25, which gives 75104 feet, for the distance between Hatfield Broad Oak and Southweald Steeples. In order to connect the preceding triangles with those carried on for the survey of the south-western part of Essex, and of Hertfordshire, stations were selected on Hampstead Heath, and on Highbeech in Epping Forest, to which the great theodolite was taken, as related in the article detailing the particulars of the operations in 1799. The triangles making this connection are the following. The first, namely, Severndroog Tower 28° 58' 10” Southweald - 9449 5 Langdon Hill - 56 12 45, is had from the included angle at Severndroog Tower, 28° 58’ 10”, and the sides Severndroog Tower and Southweald, Severndroog Tower and Langdon Hill: the first is 73787 feet, and the second 88470 feet. From these data, we obtain the distance between the station on Langdon Hill and that on Southweald Steeple = 43001 feet. Names of Stations. Observed Distances. angles. P F = O; eet Feet. everndroog Tower - 24 24 35 a 73553* Langdon Hill - cli ch NagasGr an \ Brentwood { 36016 Brentwood Steeple Severndroog Tower - 4 33 29 78553* Southweald - - aa tie) } Brentwood 7” { 7706 Brentwood : Foot of the cross on the dome of St. Paul’s from the station on Severndroog Tower 39962". Phil. Trans. for 1787. p. 250. Severndroog Tower - 53539 4 . 71534 St.Paul’s - 2 - | 51 24 12 } Highbeech oi { 61919 Highbeech Severndroog Tower - 44 34 28 , * Highbeech = - - - | 69 53 13 }southweald Fe { ee Southweald MDCCC, es 686 The Account of a From the last triangle, we find the distance from Severndroog ‘Tower to the station on Southweald Steeple to be 73795 feet; this, it will be perceived, is deduced from the distance between the cross on the dome of ‘St. Paul’s and Severndroog Tower; but 73791 feet has been found by the triangle, which is derived from the distance between the latter station and Wrotham. A difference of 4 feet on such a distance, all things consi- dered, is not a large quantity. : 3 ute Names of Stations. . ' Observed : Distances. etre Angles. Severndroog T 5 8 'r ly | ogecee everndroog Tower - 4 I ‘8558* Highbeech - - - on 16 44 ep a i A! ¥ { be Breniwood Spire 3 Severndroog Tower - RIP Zqriziy 6485 Highbeech bs ? -| 58 29 19 } Hampstead Heath - { “3 424 Hampstead Heath Highbeech - - -| 24 36 5 roa 6181 Hampstead - - 4|- 33 ei 1 Ta hse. ae I x { » 25966 St. Paul’s ; wie. As it became necessary to ascertain the situation of a high building near Berkhamstead, which, for distinction sake, I shall style the Gazebo, the instrument was removed from the station on Highbeech, to another farther west of it, as some trees obstructed the view of this object from the former. To get the distance from St. Paul’s to this new station, the distance between it and the old one was measured, and found = 460 feet: the angles in the following triangle were also observed. - — 2 Highbeech, old station 66° 32° 47” Highbeech, new station 113-3 46° 5 St. Paul’s __ which gives the distance from St. Paul’s to the new station 61738 feet. Ce" — ——— Highbeech, new station == 105 21 44 | - moat 49631 Berkhamstead Gazebo - Ar og "2b" -A@azepO * ~ ee St. Pauls - . f 88872 - - 4o \ , M _ Sovuthweald - + - 16 46 15 ; ba So 46717 Highbeech, old station - 52 16 51 } Bpping Bondi d { 17042* Siand of Epping Windmill : eae: Severndroog Tower S: 10 68 44 |, A eg : 81891 Highbeech - - - {122 10 45 }pping Windonlll ‘. ( 17043* Siand of Epping Windmill Trigonometrical Survey. 687 Names of Stations. | Observed ~ Bs Distances. angles. _ : i a | OL ap ey Feet. Highbeech, old station - 99 19 16 }Eppin z Windwill i : bee Berkhamstead Gazebo - 17°41 25 Stand of Epping Windmill At the new station on Highbeech, the angle between the staff on the Gazebo at Berkhamstead and the old station was observed, and found to be 141? 45 50". This angle, with the measured distance between the stations, and also the distance from the Gazebo to the new station, which are respectively 460° and 49628 feet, gives 49987 feet, for the distance between the new station on Highbeech and Berkhamstead Gazebo. Hatfield Broad Oak Steeple - [59 1 0 87140 Berkhamstead Gazebo - 43.12 50 | Hatfield Broad Oak = 60219 Epping Windmill - Pineeositba ¥ Berkhamstead Gazebo - 249 55 4 3917 Hatfield Broad Oak = - = =«|:'17 19 38 }Naseing i: . { epi Naseing Steeple Hatfield Broad Oak - 107 3 § bdo 26 Berkhamstead Gazebo - 20 i 14 |} Henham See aoe { ace Henbam on the Mount Steeple Hatfield Broad Oak © - FI 28» 242 Henham onthe Mount - 36 6 x } Thorley X 7 { file Thorley Steeple Henham on the Mount - B5ei25 0 882 Thorley Steeple _—- - | 69 33 0 j} Atterbury ¥ r { te Atterbury Steeple wie Henham on the Mount - 87°20 0 anya: 17816 Thorley ©. - - = 24.57 50 }Rickling 7 i { 42169 Rickling Steeple Henham on the Mount - 20-54-05 527 Rickling - - 146 35 0 }Bmdon . . { see Elmdon Steeple 4 Te 688 The Account of a The angle between Albury and Elmdon Steeples was observed, at Henham on the Mount, and found to be 72° 47' 38’. The distances from the former stations to the latter are 37882 and 45275 feet, which give the following triangle : - Henham - hw 47' 38” Albury - 60 28 27 Elmdon - = 46 43 35, from whence we get ae distance between Albury and Elmdon = 49701 feet. ) of Tat? Names of Stations. Observed Distances. angles. h h 6 30: se 988 Henham on the Mount - 106 30 50 , 2298 Elmdon 3 - - -| 23 2 40 }rhaxted - { 56302 Thaxted Steeple Elmdon~ - - - 71 54 10 } A 55262 Thaxted - - - | 53 28 44 Babee . { 65504 Balsham Steeple Elmdon - - - 43559 Balsham - - - 23255 Babrabam Mouni Station Elmdon - S ~ 29 46 30 y : wf a { 24.806 Babraham Mount - - =| 32 56 30} it plow 29185 Triplow Steeple ~The angle at Henham on the Mount, between Hatfield Broad Oak and Thaxted Steeples, is 109° 10° 44”; and the distances of the latter stations from the former one are 39266 and 22988 feet ; from these data we have the triangle, ts pate Henham = = - = ~— 409° 10’ 44" Thaxted - - 45 56 29 Hatfield Broad Oak - 24 52 47, which gives 51608 feet for the distance of Thaxted from Hatfield Broad Oak. Hatfield Broad Oak - = 51 24858 4 Beauchamp Roding - - | 64 i; a | Nan Raitt nine (| 44h High Easter Steeple et Severndroog Tower - =" 23 - f | 50989 Langdon Hill » - - 24 10 20 9 | | Hornchur ee a (| 44832* Hornchurch Steeple Langdon Hill - - - 177 57 33 44837” Gravesend s+ - =} 50.59 © Hortichurch " { 56438 Hornchurch Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 689 Observed Distances. angles. Names of Stations. a — See tee Se ee vetoes | ener ee a os, he Feet. Gravesen - - - 24. 32 30 : 4 35517 Hornchurch - é 3 Zi 26,22 } Purfleet Cliff { 23282 Purfleet Cliff Station Severndroog Tower - - 39 44 2 . 25383 Hornchurch - - | 27 16 44 } Barking o w 35404 Staircase of Barking Steeple Severndroog Tower. = = | 39 41 fe 28046 St, Paul’s - - = - 144 15 27 > |} Westham m = { 25662 Westham Steeple ArT. xxx1x. Secondary Triangles. St. Paul’s from Severndroog Tower 39962 feet. Severndroog Tower - Beer ee | { 26371 St. Paul’s - - - - | 22 36 4 } Limehouse ‘ 15456 Limehouse Steeple Severndroog Dongs - - 9 15 30 . : 2 57757 Highbeech - - - | 32 36 38 } Chigwell { 17242 Chigwell Steeple Severndroog Tower = - - | 11.57.\,6.) Low. bite IOOILO Prierning =) = - | 74 34 30 } Billericay y { 21506 Billericay Chapel Westham Steeple - - 45 58 o 15640 Staircase of Barking Steeple - | 68 35 0 } Station 7 % { 12077 Station on Bank of the Thames Station on Bank of the Thames f 41 21 131Z0 Westham Steeple - - 56 15 t10 S| pPerry SSS SE { 10424 Perry's Mast House Hornchurch — - - 14 3% 20 33236 Staircase of Barking Steeple 68 52 ¢ | } Chimney i { 9005 Chimney of Public House at Bark- ing Creek Purfleet Cliff - - -154 57 0 21002 Hornchurch - - 46 40 © }Guzzard y . { 23638 Guzzard Station Ggo The Account of a Names of Stations. Observed angles. Distances, o ¢ a 34 11 30 gz) o Purfleet Cliff - - - Hornchurch - = = Rainham Steeple }Rainham - Purfleet Cliff == - - | 81 9 o . 16212 Hornchurch - | 31 50 50 }ReWvidere : a ( 30369 Lord Page, S, Belvidere Purfleet Cliff - - 42 18 30 10971 Rainham - | 41 45 0 } cold a ae { 11090 Station at Cold Eaybour : : Guzzard - - - 56 8 20 . 21436 Hornchurch - - - | 56 43 20 } Aveley Ml a 4 { 21302 Aveley Mill Purfleet Cliff = - - - | 34 2 40 3630 Hornchurch E = | os 37140 } Valence ae " { — Valence Tree : Gravesend ° - - 79 39 30 17008 Severndroog Tower = - | 13 41 10 } Chadwell -, i 70717 Chadwell Steeple @ Gravesend. - - - 35 39 0 18479 Chadwell Steeple a a | 79 31 20 Ree J * { 10953 Greys Steeple , Gravesend - - - 37 46 oO ; | 22880 | Chadwell Steeple - 94 24 0 ee ae —— { 14054 Flagstaff on Mr. Button’s s Bowe Gravesend - - - fist 43hh0 Chadwell Steeple - - 80 2 30 } west Thurrock - { West Thurrock Steeple Gravesend - “ 49 8 30 gajaet® Hornchurch 2 - 136 7 5 } Horndon - 2 { as, Horndon Spire Gravesend - - - | 18 52 o : Chadwell = - - 59 26 30 } West Tilbury me { 14956 West Tilbury Steeple Gravesend ia - | 69 31 27] 7 8955 Chadwell - - - 30 27 42 } Northfeet 7 ° { 16179 Northflect Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 691 Names of Statione. Observed Distances. angles. fe) 1 7] , ae Gravesend = = as 57 16 0 Py 2 { 1632 Chadwell = = 59 13 30 } Base Tilbury 159387 East Tilbury Flagstaff . Chadwell - : - 51 23 0 + iy ‘ " { 26526 Mr. Button’s Flagstaff = - g5 22 gor } Station x 20031 Station near Ockendon = Mr. Button’s Flagstaff - | 54.20 30 }orset a hae { 17360 Station near Ockendon - 54 54 3° 17240 Orset Steeple Gravesend - - 45 9 13 . ae , {| 41433 Halstow —_- = 2 62 a 1@ [fe PPE L| 33270 Fobbing Steeple Hadleigh Station ——- 65 31 12 \ 5 ‘ ” { 26221 Halstow - - - 45 48 50 popes 33279 Fobbing Steeple Halstow - = 10I 39 27 Be { 41342 Guneead - 37° 10 ho j Thundersley Thundersley Steeple - Halstow ~—— — | 7 53 10 } ; " ¥ { 5713 Hadleigh - - 117 13 23 eich 37028 Hadleigh Spire - = ‘ Hadleigh =} - 89 20 40 } oR { 15735 Halstow | to - 24 54 27 pesh fi N 37357 Leigh Steeple itease - Halstow - - 74. 23 37359 Sheppey Station - 42 a °3 } Leigh P 7 { 53325 Leigh Steeple Staircase Halstow - - IBA 45 41434. Sheppey 46 5 47 j ehgervess ; { 13063 Sheerness Fort F ectage Hadleigh | }south Church | - eppey South Church Steeple Hadleigh | = ¥, weed Be sf Joes Sheppey Station 2 80 16 46 } Pritelewel ae { ’ Prittlewell Steeple 692 The Account of a Names of Stations. Observed . Distances. — angles. Canewden Steepl 15 gO 38: anewden Steeple : 45 50 0 : a { 23850 Prittlewell == 60 46 30 } Lite i Manes 19003 . Little Wakering Steeple Prittlewell = e s Bank Flagstaff Prittlewell - 5 Station on Bank Shoebury-ness Canewden - : 32 51 30 35481 | Bank Flagstaff —- a 81 20 0 }Foul-ness : o- { 19473 Foul-ness Chapel fe: si Le } Shoebury-ness - { Canewden A « | Rayleigh - - 47 28 6 ‘ 71622 © Peldon \ ‘ 43 45 33 } signal Staff -« - { “baad Foul-ness Signal Staf Tillingham Steeple - 139 21 10 ‘ e { 13990 Peldon - 9 44 29 } Signal Staff 5gROe.) Signal Staff, Filing bam Ga Tillincham - c 43 27 58 } : 5 f 18802 Peldow - 24 10 18 Signal Staff 31591 Signal Staff, Bi aiwell Point Tillingham - - 31 2 40 fl eo Peldon 2 m 100 56 20 } Brightlingsea Brightlingsea Steeple Tillingham - < 39 48 40 } 2 West Mersey Steeple = 57 33 33 Tolesbury Tolesbury Steeple nae | ee eee ee | Tillingham - é 63a5h 16 } ud : { 31946 Triptree, old Station - ete a Althors Z 49330 Altborn Church én Tillingham - - Althorn - - “ Burnham Steeple \ " 3 j Burnham { Peldon 3 ts 56 33 25 }Toleshunt Tolesbunt Major Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 692 Observed angles. Names of stations. Distances. ees mene, | A en | a ES YE SS SE ont; Feet Prittlewell Steeple - 33 10 21208 Bank Flagstaff - - 39 20 SignaliStaff_ - ‘ 18302 Signal Staff; Shoebury-ness Triptree, new Station = 38.05) 18 19425 Danbury - - - jo. 1 27 } Maldon i 7 ; 23829 Maldon Spire Triptree, new Station - 36 48 30 36118 Danbury - - - 2 @ Purleigh yi p: j 22734 Purleigh Steeple Danbury Pr: - = Purleigh Steeple - Steple Steeple Danbury - - e Canewden - - Fr 8.46 \ Hockley ; 23555 Hockley Steeple Danbury - mY haa 27.21) 50 41400 Rettenden - - - [0g 22 0 | Hockley e z } rotGe Hockley Steeple Danbury - = 3 Canewden - ~ _ Rettenaen Steeple Rettenden = Canewden Bait & | Stow, St. Mary’s = } 2500s Stow, St. Mary’s ‘Steeple Joma 4 O Rayleigh - - - FSD 18 20760 Langdon Station - ~ = 27 38 45 bRettenden i tf } 126 Rettenden Steeple Rayleigh - : - 51.8) td 2120 Langdon - - 28 10 20 Runwell 2 i } aie Runwell Steeple Danbury - - - 48 57 22 : 2 Rayleigh - 72 39 17 oe Fier ; yes Great. Burgbstead Steeple Danbury - - - II . 666 Gallywood Station - He 40 ie \ Hanningfield 2 { 24843 East Hanning field Steeple MDCCC. A, U 694 The Account of a Names of stations. Observed Distances, angles. Frierning Steep! 6 "7 4 6826 rierning Steeple - - 36 7 48 1682 Danbury - - - 15 38 36 BES : 36793 Stock Steeple Triptree, old Station - 18 38 11 55°75 Tillingham Steeple - 83 33 14 17711 Southminster Steeple Peldon Steeple - - 7 ace ot 20180 Tillingham - 23 54 4 j pie poe y 49369 Layer Marney Steeple Peldon - - - 80 20 6 : 60701 Tillingham 61 39 24 t signal ae : } 67990 Signal Staff, St. Osyth Point Thorp Steeple 2 a: 143.1 75 20 21517 Little Bentley - 18 54 29 + signal pra ¥ 39344 Great Clackton Signal Staff Thorp - © - DPS BE BS 18920 Peldon - - 16 58 13 SEES EOS: i ; 61508 Great Clackton Steeple Dover Court Steeple - 24 36 48 38998 Thorp - - os gz 26 41 IEE Fr . 16257 Finton Steeple ; Dover Court - - 39 16 34 : : 34686 Thorp - 70 11 16 SRE CEE 23340 Finton Signal Stafe Dover Court - - 53 15 26 ? 26275 Thorp - - - 47 52.22 ies 28389 Walton Tower or Sea-mark Dover Court - - 133 57 30 : F ¢ ; 15085 Thorp _ - - 13 29 57 | § ~uPOM 46517 Cupola, Verndeuard Fort : Thorp - - - 46 16 17 ; : 7 7 { 47494 Peldon - - - 47 1 34 ee 46901 Ardleigh Steeple ‘5 Peldon - - 106 10 16 ‘ 7 35433 Great Tey Steeple - 32 32 11 } Prating 3 { 63274 Frating Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 695 Names of Stations.” AEN A Distances, angles. oer ET ee Thorp - - - 30, 1m7" 45'S au 23390 Little Bentley Steeple - go 41 23 pSetmupren 12053 Thorrington Steeple Dover Court - - 22 10 12 ‘Thorp - = c 59 48 37 Kirby Steeple Little Oakley - Dover Court - - 33 Kirby Steeple - - 18 Little Oakley Steeple Layer de la Hay Steeple = - 45 2 Toleshunt Major Steeple Dover Court - - Tattingstone Steeple - - Brantham Steeple Dover Court - - | 70) 520 58 2 ; 19946 Rushmere Steeple - - | 16 51 Blanlstead a 35319 Harkstead Steeple Dover Court - - 33 17 30 13053 Tattingstone Sent aes -|14 20 0 Arwarton i ‘ ; 28941 Arwarton Steeple Tattingstone - - - | 66 10 o 20998 Arwarton Steeple - - | 43.12 0 Bene ik (- ; 28059 Bradfield Steeple Dover Court - - 72 48 50 : 8881 Rushmere : - - 9 58 0 amc 3 f ; 49036 Harwich Spire Dover Court - - 56 48 20 57475 Rushmere - - - | 67 58 30 Hollesley y ji j 51881 Hollesley Steeple Dover Court - - 47. 7 40 t 3%. 52205 Rushmere - - - | 68 4 20 HS . j 41224 Shottisbam Steeple Dover Court - - 65.59 785 61 Rushmere - : - | 52 42.10 } Bawdsey = " / fou Bawdsey Steeple ¢ 696 The Account of a Names of Stations. ele Distances, : 4 ae Dover Court - - 52 48 i a ¥ sé ou 289 Woodbridge Steeple - 28 31 Felixstow 48262 Felixstow Signal Staff Dover Court - - 45. 12-155 } . 42265 Woodbridge - - 4453 0 BUGS] 42510 Bawdsey Signal Staff Rushmere - - - |, AS Aa 5, J ti 75267 Falkenham Steeple - 1037'"'52) 10 orford 55472 Orford Steeple Woodbridge - - 28 29 110 a { 21686 Butely Steeple - - 34° 37) 10 J} Rendlesham 18204 Rendlesham Steeple Butely - - - 15323 0 a { 15762 Rendlesham - - IZ 209 j Orford 33057 Orford Steeple Dover Court - - 8 2616 i f { > 7371 Rushmere - o 1 664) 10 | Kesgrave 48505 Kesgrave Steeple Dover Court - - 34 14 16 } Pe 7 { 45360 Rushmere - - - | 62 15 50 a Saveucie 28841 Waldring field Steeple Dover Court - - 30 58:10 } ‘ { 40331 Kesgrave Steeple - - | 56 8.30 pine tad 24993 Whertstead Steeple Falkenham - - -| 30 59 0 } c ~ { 25098 Rushmere - - = *1°36"-" 2) 50 ALE 21959 Nacton Steeple Dover Court - - 13 29 58] 1 = a {| 55220 Stoke a - : ZZ 45 20 yes: L| 33325 Capel Steeple Stoke - ° - 24 14 18 . A { 40790 Capel Steeple - LTO3 0, 44. hepa 17186 Hintlesham Steeple Stoke - - - 29 43°10 . i? ; 42238 Lavenham Steeple - - ¥'6r'31 40 ee 23821 Bildestone Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 697 Names of Stations. ey Distances. iss Hey , ‘i z Feet, Stoke - - - 33 53 40 ; 4 ‘ . j 32055 Bildestone Steeple - - | 48 50 10 algbai 23746 Aldham Steeple Lavenham - - =. || 20.99) 50 : , is } 42673 Naughton - - 93 17 20 Hadleigh 21154 Hadleigh Spire : Layenham - - - | 31 40 10 : a i | 25138 Naughton Steeple - 42 21 50 \ Lindsey 19537 Lindsey Steeple Stoke - - - 23-7 30 : :, } 27153 Lavenham - - - | 24 48 40 ewpon 25413 Newton Steeple Stoke - - - 27 14 10 " E 19660 Newton - - - |42 49 0 + Groton j 13140 Grotton Steeple. Bulmer Steeple - Lo 67 27 4o . i j 25637 Glemsford Steeple - = 1°53 37150 } Waldingfild 29407 Walding field Steeple Lavenham - : - 56 59 Oo 7 a j 14065 Glemsford - - 33) 850 Acton 21097 Acton Steeple Lavenham = Z - | 26 13 10 ]2 41546 Bulmer - gi 21 20 | § Peaemp : ; 18360 Beauchamp Church, St. Poul?s Lavenham - - 12.30 150 F 59359 Topplesfield Steeple - 27 20 Hedingham Castle } 16316 - High western part aged ban : Castle i | Lavenham - - - | 26° 57%0 : 4 62325 Bulmer - - 123 32 © | Ridgew a4 ‘ } 33886 Ridgewell Steeple Stoke Steeple - - IOl 57 15 sa si 17904 Nauzhton Steeple - ZO 22) 45 } Langham ™ { 49907 Langham Steeple : Stoke Steeple - - 21 17 20 : 13615 Great Tey Steeple - - 8 23 40 } Great Boy) { 33859 Great Horksley Steeple . 698 The Account of a Names of Stations. - Observed Distances. angles. Stoke - - - 71 21 Twinestead Steeple - 19 53 Great Horksley Steeple Stoke - - - 44. 24 Great Horksley - ~ 109 43 Mount Bures Steeple Stoke = - = 62 30 40 ‘ ks 47756 St. Mary’s, Colchester - 70 48 oO Eatles (Colne 44860 Earles Colne Steeple Great Tey - = - | 24 47 20 : re 21357 St. Mary’s Colchester - 23° 148 10 BY of Bexpholt ; 16339 West Bergholt Steeple ij Danbury - - i 6 6° 0 pe mr 41358 Great Tey - - -| 6 56 40 Brajied 36349 Brazxted Steeple Braxted Steeple > - 11 43 36 10407 Kelvedon Steeple Great Tey - - - | 30 14 50 . Bes 3 223g0 Kelvedon - - - | 58 32 0 Messing 13223 Messing Steeple Great Te - - - | 51 43 10 p 15462 Kavedon - - -| 36 4 0 Het lier 20616 East Thorp Steeple Danbury - - - 50 48 o : 51487 Triptree, new station =~ 85 12 30 BESO 40039 Black Notley Steeple { t { ie gale - - )egeliuee ; { Danbury - - 23 51 34 : a a Triptree, old station - - 177 29 26 MRSS 14852 Witham Steeple Danbury - _— - . 47 47 25 : i 31874 Triptree, old station - 58 17 35 Tne 27751 Tarling Spire Danbury - - - 51 43. 0 : si . 58918 Triptree, old station - go 45 50 Braise 46252 Braintree Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 699 Names of Stations. ie a . “ Qo 1 “ Triptree, new station ° 56 13 54 Gallywood station - - | 64 47 51 Feltstead Steeple Danbury - - - 26 31 30 Feltstead Steeple - - | 73 49 10 Braintree Steeple Danbury - - - Pleshley Steeple - - Feltstead Steeple Triptree, new station + 274.23020 Danbury - 27, 35530 S. Spire of Hatfield Pever el Abbey Pleshley - Feltstead - Great Leigh Steeple Danbury = 4l 29 44 Pleshley - i6 39 0 Great Baddow Steeple Danbury - - 23 59 Pleshley - - - 20 21 Chelm ford Spire Danbury - - 32 38 36 Pleshley - - - 4l 51 20 Whittle Steeple Danbury - - 19 16 20 Hatfield Broad Oak - 35 29 15 Willingale Spain Steeple Pleshley - - - 36.1250 Gallywood station - 26.14 36 Roxwell Steeple Pleshley - - » 103 44 45 Gallywood station = - | 34 9 50 White Roding Steeple Southweald Steeple - 27 51 51 Frierning Steeple - - { 30 14 50 Doddinghurst Steeple Distances, ‘ Feltstead } Braintree h Feltstead } Hatfield Peverel - } Great Baddow = Chelmsford - - } whittle 4 ‘s { t t Tat a oe { { { }witlingate Spain os ( 60488 } Roxwell = © { | B6630 } White Roding - { 33489 57926 } Doddinghurst zi { 17880 700 The Account of a Cupola of a house at Woodford Names of stations. Observed Distances. angles,* , Oe TT a Feet Southweald - - 349 0 31098 Epping Windmill - 7.31| 0 ee . 15824 Theydon Mount Steeple Southweald - - 49 23°) Off? 9656 Theydon Mount Steeple —- 16 26 0 ieee + oes 25846 Navestock new Windmill Southweald 7 - - 58 po 37107 Theydon Mount - - 149 43. 0 \ Pheydon eannan . } 6797 Theydon Garnon Steeple Theydon Mount - - Ill 19 30 21090 Theydon Garnon— - - 53 3870 1 Havering P ‘ ; 24397 Havering Steeple Severndroog Tower - 5 40 20 52260 Highbeech Station 14 49 4 i Crea. a= - ‘ 20197 Southweald - - 36 20 20 : 51340 Highbeech - - 65 36 20 Ruins " 33405 Ruins near Ilford Highbeech - - 102 38 o|)? 34702 St. Paul’s - - 2608 2 Wo jo uesbant - a ; 77151 Cheshunt Station Berkhamstead Gazebo : 3157 Naseing Steeple - - i Hunsdon is ; 18911 Hunsdon Steeple Naseing - - - O4a3s © 13899 Hunsdon Steeple - — - 34 41 gitae green : 24348 Broxbourn Steeple Berkhamstead Gazebo - 8 33 28 62528 Hatfield Broad Oak Steeple 20 11 Il ; Dae Sheep Ne : ; 26964. Harlow Steeple Hatfield Broad Oak - 19 44 10 . 21054. Naseing : 11 48 5 Sabridgeworth 34763 Sabridgeworth Steeple Thorley Steeple - - Albury Steeple = = Great Hadbam Steeple 45.17 © 40 29 0 + Great Hadham - j 13253 Trigonometrical Survey. 701 Names of stations. Observed Distances. angles. ° , @ Henham on the Mount Steeple 31 43 34 : Albury Steeple 3 " eaha4 6 Bishop Stortford - Bishop Stortford Steeple i Henham on the Mount - 42 32 24 16575 Albury z 2335 3 } Stanstead Mountfitchet } 28009 Stustent Mountfitcbet Steeple Henham on the Mount - Bony © 24419 Stanstead Mountfitchet - TOM 2) O i Nancsiain a * ; 13323 Farnham Steeple Henham on the Mount - 38 33 0 39054 Albury - - - 73 13 10 oe j 25421 Meesdon Windmill Henham on the Mount - 40 10 40 21677 Elmdon Steeple - - 25 58 10 } Octagon wig ‘ } 31938 Chimney on an octagon Lodge Balsham Steeple - - 75 Tsu s 23740 Elmdon-— - - 25 Zz a are Fe j 53410 Shady Camps Steeple i Balsham =~ = : 7 10 30778 Shady Camps - - 2 19 0 } ashdon 5 me j 16120 Ashdon Steeple Danbury - - - Q 35 7646 Thaxted Spire - - 26 an ae i ; 7e8sG Litile Saling Steeple - Elmdon - - - 22 27,0 26492 Rickling Steeple - - 64 25 0 {Newport i E { rae Newport Steeple Danbury - - - 7. 5.3.06 71826 Little Saling Bole - 61 38 0 haa a ; T1198 Stebbing Sieeple -MDCCC. 4% = 702 The Account of a Art. xL. Principal Triangles for the Survey of the Western Part of Kent. Plate XXXIII. Frant Steeple from Botley Hill 90362,4 feet. Names of stations. Observed Distances. angles. Frant Steeple : - Botley Hill - - 3 7 phi hala } Sevenoaks - - { ba da 32 52 47 Sevenoaks old Windmill Frant - - 22 17 10 «yas 42875 Sevenoaks Windmill - 40 52 50 } Chiddingstone 2 { 24858 Chidding stone Steeple - Frant - - - 35 217 . 57874 Chiddingstone —- : 07 43 43° } Mount pion to oe { Mount Sion Station Frant - - - 31 28 30° Mount Sion - 76 9g 30 East Peckham Steeple Mount Sion = is East Peckham - ia Tudely Steeple Botley Hill - Sevenoaks Wmadiill - Seal Chart Station Seal Chart - - Sevenoaks Windmill - Tunbridge Steeple Seal Chart - - 78 1 Sevenoaks Windmill - Station on Otford Mount ° Sevenoaks Windmill - - | 69 27 Otford Mount - - 61 24 Silverden Farm Station re) } Silverden Pann i fo} Norwood from Severndroog Tower 39155 feet. Norwood > - 538 7°40 : f Severndroog Tower - 84 8 © j wen By ie 5 vi 46155 Well Hill Station Trigonometrical Survey. 703 Names of stations. Observed Distances. _angles. s d T ° eit pees everndroog lower - 5 I4- 2 Well Hill : a8 ae + Crayford iy phe Crayford Steeple Well Hill = = 77 37 40 | 34738 Crayford - - - 48 8 40 j ap . ; i 45555 Ash Steeple Ash - - - 10 | 32237 Crayford - sd "3 38 Fe 4 1 North fleet - - } ees _ Northfleet Steeple Ash - - - 15 3G A= 266 Northfleet - = 3s if g \ Gravesend 3 ii } py Gravesend Station ; ; Ash : - 47 33 3° : 56308 Northfleet - - 97 53 4° } Belvidere % é { 41951 Lord Eardley’s, Belvidere * Gravesend from Halstow 44836 feet. _ Gravesend - - 31 38 20 : | 22276 Halstow = - tz : 24 18 20 } Gadshill a y ; 28388 Gadshbill Station ~ Sheppey - - 13 18 Gadshill Sheppey from Gadshill LEDS: iit Clade Hernhill Steeple - - Stockbury Steeple Halstow - - - © 34 28 ; | 71603 i Stockbury - j 43144 Frinstead Steeple Sh 65 27 18 Ak 57820 “Sheppey - = : 65a Hernhill - « { 38439 Hernhill Steeple ART. XLi. Secondary Triangles. Frant Steeple - - 26 37 20 Botley Hill Station - 9 52 49 Bidborough Steeple 26066 ‘| 68071 Frant - - = Chiddingstone Steeple - Station near Bidborough Church 20. 52 Bo ; 27227 29 5 © { Station ; } 19953 4X 2 7OA The Account of a Names of stations. Observed — Distances. angles. : ee rant - - - : 24pm Botley Hill ; al es i Remarkable Tree - j 99201 Remarkable Tree near Kibben’ Ss Cross Frant - Station near Bidborough Church Cowden Steeple Station near Bidborough Church Chiddingstone Steeple - Mount Sion Station : Station near Bidborough Church Mount Sion - - Leigh Steeple Frant L = 2 Chiddingstone - - Ide Hill Station Chiddingstone - - 67 42 0 Ide Hill - 49 43. 0 Edenbridge Steeple Seal Church Steeple - 15132 Otford Mount - - 17766 Sevenoaks Steeple ‘ Mount Sion Station. - 20 36 0 25291 Peckham Steeple — - - 47 56 0 \ Hadlow 7 - 11987 Hadlow Steeple Seal Chart Station - 50 45 0 . 29804. Otford Mount ~— - - toa olf oe s ‘ 23131 Sundrich Steeple LL LL LLL ILL LLL OL Otford Mount - e 94. 17 Silverden Station - Seal Steeple Well Hill Station Norwood Windmill, Reston Giniion Well Hill - - Severndroog Tower - 37 39 («0 Flagstaff on Hayes Common Trigonometrical Survey. 7O5 Norwood from Severndroog Tower 32155 feet... Between the triangles Names of Stations. Observed Distances. angles. OCT te Feet Norwood - - = i 65.53 30 } ze , aaa 30718 Severndroog Tower 2 46 30 0 Hlagstalt 38654" Hayes Common Norwood - - - | 34 27 30 Hayes Common - 30) 41, 50 Flagstaff on Addington Common Well Hill - - - | 56 11 40 } 4 " { 20860 Norwood - - mI 22* Aidt 5 Sheng) 48958 Cudbam Steeple Well Hill from Otford Mount 19206 feet. Otford Mount - - 52 13 22860 Well Hill “4 73 58 0 S | }Knockholt Beeches - { 18790 Knockbolt Beeches, East End. - Well Hill - - =" |) 22122) 26 Crayford Steeple - - Al 17 10 }Race House - { aed Dome of a Race House Well Hill - = Sided Wane. vm Norwoed - 39 30 24 Windmill, Bromley Ciiniien Well Hill - - - |59 1 11650 Severndroog Tower - 13 58 © ¢ | } Farborough na { 41381 Farnborough Station Well Hill - - - | 58 52 o ’ 17255 Farnborough - 2 AQ 3210 }se. ES Bae yi ( 15019 St. Mary’s Cray Steeple Well Hill - - 79 42 26 8653 Norwood 8 4 «| } Halstead : 5 { 56492 Halstead Steeple. Norwood - - - | 36 36 4o 22696 Severndroog Tower ~~ - 32 52 50 } Bromley a q { 24932 Bromley Steeple Well Hill . - - | 32 29 oO 36198 Severndroog Tower - ch 130 { Bromley ag F ; 22938 Bromley Steeple 706 The Account of a . ~ - Names of Stations. wrsiiag Distances. iH 3 Ecet, Well Hill = - ~ =eienil 2 ~ 4 ; 3 Bromiley - - = - Bl 25) 2 Hay g8o5 Hayes Steeple Bromley - - 45-48 Ob Ls asters a os 19640 Severndroog Tower - 51 28 0 17846 Lewisham Steeple Severndroog Tower from Chiselhurst Steeple, 36778. Severndroog Tower - } Chiselhurst Steeple - New Cross Station Severndroog Tower j New Cross. - - - 14496 Eastcombe Point Station Severndroog Tower - 49 39 0 : i " j 9628 Eastcombe Point - = "1 38 55, 0 Wicosict 13879 Woolwich Steeple Severndroog Tower - 15 1 30 a h, ; Crayford - - | 57 48 20] Bexley Bezley Steeple Well Hill ~— - 2 al SES Ke) : 3 j 22835 Crayford - - - | 36 39 0 + Charlton 33714 Charlton Farm Crayford - - ~- | 23 17 10 i r » 20374 Charlton Farm - - | 28 14 0 Diaten 17026 Darent Steeple Ash Steeple —- 2 12 56 49 : 2 33636 Crayford - - - | 30 32 18 Dartford Baa 14830 Dartford Brent Mill Crayford - - - 16 16 18 21153 Stone Steepie - - gi.) 0 Dartford Brent 8069 te fal 15.44 5°. |) stetley a init Northfleet Steeple - - 4 56 20 24750 Hartley Steeple Northfleet = ~ 8 40 40 : A 7 33675 Ash - - = 101 42 0 t Ridley 5189 Ridley Steeple Trigonometrical Survey. 707 Observed Names of Stations. adglen Distances Northfleet e = : 90 16 30 } Gravesend Station - 4g 26 6 Southfleet < Southfleet Steeple Gadshill - - = : 119539 Sheppey Isle AS My } Strottenden Mill - { 7g Shottenden Windmill ‘Gravesend Station - - | 4046 7 } : . 30549 Gadshill - - -| gz 28 1 Cliff Ss { 19967 Cliff Steeple Gravesend Station - - . 14115 Gadshill < - } Higham -. % { 23489 Higham Steeple Gravesend Station - = 86 16 16 3373 Halstow Station - - 4 18 ig } Gravesen g i { 44.747 Gravesend Steeple Gravesend - - - 11621 Halstow - = = 6 Chalk Steeple ee Gravesend - - - | 59 21 48 . 2828 Gaishitt | | - 92 5 «57 } Lower Hope Point - { = oat Lower Hope Point, letamuch of the Guard Room Gravesend - = : ; 6 Gadshill = - - } Titbury oe ‘ t Ayres Flagstaff, Tilbury F ont Gadshill - - - Sheppey - = & Rainham Steeple 28 52 26 } Rainham = Gadshill = aie - 1128 37 56 2 Halstow - = 4 29 12 53 + Swanscombe - 2 ; 3°747 Swanscombe Spire Gadshill - - 124 43 26 10 Halstow ~ - - | 28 58 21 { Northflee 4 ; paeee Northflect Steeple Halstow - - - 4 37 23 36 Gravesend . 159 53 20 + Southfleet 7 { an Southfleet § teeple 708 The Account of a Names of Stations, Observed Distances, angles. G d ren ee Feet. ravesen - - - | 38 36 50 : say Habtow toe «7 3 Pee FP Sbone anit "7 a Shorn Mill 48453° Stockbury — - - -|'79'3te's 31257 Sheppey = : Tol eSONRZB AAD eit eects Gillingham Steeple ‘ Sheppey = = =) Og ag P52 Gillingham ~~ 24 34 17 }se. James’s Church St. Fames’s Church, Isle af Grain Halstow - Sheppey Gillingham Steeple Bat zs } Gillingham = = a Gadshill - - = Sheppey - - Friendsbury Steeple 23 35 24 4 10 33 11049 23822 48453* | 60721 OV Halstow - Sheppey Chimney of the ‘Star iy 73239 35 45 47 Halstow - Sheppey High Staff at the Upper Bell itive a a BS ous [RE BEF rae ie = Twinestead = - Hove Steeple Gadshill - = 4 Sheppey - 3 = Upchurch Spire Gadshill —- Sie agen (uz ial as 60739 Sheppey - - =" Wilt 20) 2 Bobbing z 3 26212 Bobbing Spire Sheppey - - Halstow ~~ = Flagstaff, Sheerness Cagsan 52765 15656 Sheppey = e a Frinstead a é : Hucking Spire _ Trigonometrical Survey. 709 Observed -Angles. —e Names of Stations. Distances$ ees BU ence anamemmenmnmntad moa? Feet Sheppey - - + ~ | 29 27 6 : A 58439 East Church Station - 136 15 56 Bernipill i 41564. Hernbill Steeple East Church - - - 44. 20 17 F Sheppey —- yp 95 42 22 i Peas e Milton Steeple Sheppey ace Milton - = é a i Iwade 5 ay Fon Iwade Steeple Hernhill So . 3 728 0 : \ piety Frinstead = a a 45 6 35 t Witchling e« = a Z Witchling Steepl Hernhill = - - PASI Bh) Sheppey - - > - | 25 51 16 ; Tenham - é Tenbam Steeple Sheppey - - - S 24 42 40 Bapchild Spire Sheppey : 4 = Zi) 320A : 56869 Hernhill = - 2 - 175 8 0 + sheldwich < é ace Sheldwich Steeple Sheldwich 2 4 x re Sheppey - = = anne Queenborough Steeple Hadleigh = = o ZI 19 45 oi 69035 Sheppey - fa a 114 38 31 Minster a ey Minster Steeple Halstow = = 25 cae Hadleigh s & me Maes St. Mary’s Steeple i i i ee a | re roy 1 i t Hernhill - - - 29.UH, 0" 15630 BREREEG) my ee =) “hy. gOuz 44537 Feversham Spire Tenham bi - - 41 29 0 20617 Hernhill - — - 2 36 6 o |g Hartey . - 22906 Hartey Steeple MDCCC, 4% 710 The Account of a Observed Names of Stations. Distances. Hernhill = = East Church - Sea Salter Steeple Tenham - = Sheppey - - Whitstable Steeple SECTION FOURTH. Determination of the Altitudes of the Stations above the Level of the Sea; and the mean Refractions deduced from observed Angles of elevation and depression. Art. xu. Elevations and Depressions. At Trevose Head. The ground at Cadon Barrow - - - elevated 39! 24" Bodmin Down - - - - elev. 10 48 St. Agnes - 4 ice: - depressed 6 39 Hensbarrow - - - - elev. 29 2 At Bodmin Down. The ground at Carraton Hill - - - - elev. 27 49 Trevose Head - - - - depr. 22 33 Cadon Barrow - - - - elev. 16 0 Brown Willy - - - - elev. 54 24 Cadon Barrow. The ground at Trevose Head - - - depr. 36 49 Brown Willy - - - - elev 36 3° The horizon of the sea in the direction of Trevose Head depr. 30 56 — Ditto in the direction north - “Ge i} - -. depe GL St. Stephen’s Down. The ground at Black Down - - - = elev. 25 21 Carraton Hill - - - elev. 35 18 Brown Willy - aa. 2a - elev. 42 Qo Trigonometrical Survey. 714 Black Down, near Lydford. The ground at Maker Heights = - - - depr. 32' 8" Carraton Hill - - - depr. 3 46 St. Stephen’s Down - - - depr. 35 18 Mendip Hills. The ground at Bradley Knoll - - - - depr. 6 12 Westbury Down - - - depr. 14 59 Farley Down - - - depr. 18 21 Lansdown ° - ° depr. 14 4 Moor Lynch oe - - depr. 34 53 Dundry - - : ~ depr. 15 45 Dundon Beacon - - - depr. 38 24 Ash Beacon - - - - depr. 20 45 Dundry. The ground at Mendip - - - - - elev. 5 8 Farley Down = - = - depr. 10 1 Lansdown - - - - depr. 3°19 Lansdown. The ground at Dundry~—s- - - - depr. 5 44 Mendip - = - - depr. 1 39 - Farley Down. The ground at Westbury’ - - - « depr. o 12 Mendip - - - - elev. § 51 Dundry = - - . - depr. 1 46 Bradley Knoll. The ground at Bull Barrow = - “ - depr. 8 59 Ash Beacon - - - - depr. 20 18 Westbury = - n - depr. 4 36 Westbury Down. The ground at Beacon Hill, Amesbury - - depr. 10 Bradley Knoll - - - elev. 7 4 Mendip - - - - elev, 1 28 Farley Down - - oes depr. 9 9 4Y 2 712 _ ‘The Account ofa Dundon Beacon. ‘ The ground at Moor Lynch - -- - = depr. ° 6 3" Lugshorn Corner - - - depr. 3 56 13 Mendip - - - - . elev. 28 18° Pilsden =: ae - - elev. 8 38 Moor Lyncb. The ground at Greylock’s Foss-way - = - depr. 59 14 Lugshorn Corner = - : depr. 32 45 Dundon Beacon : - - elev. 0 9 Mendip - - - - elev. 23°50 Pilsden - - - - - elev. 9 2 Ash Beacon - - - elev. 6 57 Greylock’s Foss-way. The ground at Moor Lynch - - - - elev. 1 53 56 Dundon Beacon - - - elev. 34 48 Top of the staff (20 feet high) at Greylock’s Foss-way - elev. © 34 Lug shorn Corner. The ground at Moor Lynch - - - - elev. 27 21 Dundon Beacon - - - elev. 1 20 58 Top of the staff (20 feet high) at the west end of the base depr, ro} Beacon Hill, Amesbury. The ground at Westbury : - - = depre 4 36 Inkpin - - - : elev. 6 22 " Inkpin Hill. The ground at White Horse Hill = - - - depre 10 54 Highclere - - 2 depr. 15 © Beacon Hill, Amesbury - - 18 24 White Horse Hill. 7 ats! The ground at Highclere - - - - depr, 7 39 Nuffield - - 2 at) ae cain 2. Shotover Hill - - - -- depr, 37 6 Trigonometrical Survey. 713 Scutchamfly Barrow. The ground at Wendover “ 2 - - depr. 5' 36" Whiteham Hill = -. - - - depr. 11 20 At Shotover Hill. The ground at Scutchamfly Barrow - - elev. © 20 Nuffield 2 - - ~ elev. 1 27 Wendover - - - - elev. 2 58 White Horse Hill rh ee - elev. 1 36 Brill on the Hill. The ground at Nuffield ° - - . depr. 4 48 Wendover © E: - elev. -3 55 Bow Brickhill - - - depr. 10 44 Epwell - ~ - - depr. 6 57 Stow - - -" - depr.§ 7° 6 White Horse Hill - - * depr. 5 45 Nuffield. ; The ground at White Horse Hill =) siA depr.. 4 45 SE of the Staff at Brill on the Hill, Staff 1 3 feet highs) depr. 6 2 Bagshot » - = - - depr. 6 43 Highclere - - ~ depr. 4 12 N. B. The half stage belonging to the Royal Society was used at this station. Wendover. The ground at Brill on the Hill - - * depr. 14 59 Shotover Hill . - S =a Udepne 7) 2% Bow Brickhill - = 2 depr. 17 28 Stanmore - - 2 2 depr. 19 57 Stow on the Wold. ‘Fhe ground at Shotover - ve S - depr. 13 48 White Horse Hill - ae - depr. 7 30 _ Broadway Beacon” - - - elev. 11 29 Brill on the Hill - - - depr. 14. 45 Epwell - - = - depr. 8 oO Broadway Beacon. The ground at Stow —s_ - - ay ay depr. 19 0 Epwell - = ~ - 5 depr. 17 25 714 The Account of a Epwell. The ground at Stow . - - depr. 3°53" Arbury Hill - - - - depr. 6 39 Brill on the Hill - - - - depr. 11 §1 Corley - - - - depr, 20 8 Broadway Beacon <= - - elev. 8 31 Arbury Hill. The ground at Epwell - - - - depr. 14 25 | Bow Brickbill. The ground at Wendover - - - =» ¢ety.693 56 Kinsworth = : - ot elev. 5 35 Brill on the Hill - -. - depre 5§ 28 Kinsworth. Bi, The ground at Brill on the Hill 2 - * depr. 12 37 Bow Brickhill - - - - depr. 17 25 Arbury Hill - - - depr. 13 44 Stanmore - . - - depr. 17 4 Lillyhoe - - - - depr. 23 44. Bagshot Heath. The ground at Nuffield ~ - - - - elev. 1 29 Stanmore - - - - depr. 7 28 Stanmore. ‘ The ground at Bagshot Heath - - - depr. 9 34 ArT. xt. Heights of the Stations. Ground above low water mark. Stations. Feet. Trevose Head = - . - - - 274 St. Agnes Beacon - - - “ - 621 Hensbarrow - - - rn = ke - 1034 Bodmin Down - - - - ene 645 Black Down - - - - 1160 St. Stephen’s Down - - 2 » - 605 Bradley Knoll ei ae - = - * 973 ArT. xLIV. Mean Terrestrial Refractions. Between : Mean Refractions. Bodmin Down and Cadon Barrow - - a Bradley Knoll and Westbury Down - - z Maker Heights and Black Down - - - S Highclere and Inkpin - - = = = St. Agnes Beacon and Trevose Head - - 5 Moor Lynch and Lugshorn Corner ° - — Hensbarrow and Trevose Head 5 = sat SR Trigonometrical Survey. 715 Stations. Ground above Jow water mark, , Feet. Mendip or oe - - - - 999 Westbury Down - - - <1 75 Dundry—- - ° - 4 79° Lansdown _ - - - - - 813 Farley Down - - - - 700 Moor Lynch - - - - - 330 Dundon Beacon - - - - 360 Lugshorn Corner 2 - - 2 49 Greylock’s Foss-way 3 ie - - 42, Ash Beacon _ - - - 655 Cadon Barrow - - - - 1011 Brown Willy = . 5 J 1368 Inkpin - - - - - IOII Nuffield - mn - ~ - 957 White Horse Hill. - ~ 2 Co e $93 Shotover Hill - - - = 599 Muzzle Hill, (Brill station) - - aut aa Whiteham Hill - - R - 576 Wendover, ground above - - - 905 Bow Brickhill co a = x 683 Kinsworth = i Le - 5 - 904 Lillyhoe = Seige ot = - = 664 Stow onthe Wold. = - a 5 iS 883 Epwell Hill - - - = - 836 Broadway Beacon - - - - « 1086 Arbury Hill - - - - - - 804 716 The Account of a , Wingreen and Bradley Knoll - - - igi Bodmin Down and Trevose Head = - - — Carraton Hill and Black Downs + © - - Os Westbury Down and Mendip~ - - - ay -Carraton Hill and St. Stephen’s Down - aritea Farley Down and Mendip - : - v8 Beacon Hill and Westbury Down - - - wv Dundry and Farley Down - - - - Dundon Beacon and Mendip . - - vy Bradley Knoll and Mendip - - - a Lansdown and Mendip - - - - is Moor Lynch and Dundon Beacon - - pee zs y Bate Ditto in a northern direction ~ - =: . = Brill and Nuffield ~ - = 7 2 clea Broadway and Stow - _ - . = Epwell and Broadway = - at iy L om Highclere and White Horse Hill = aah ie a Nuffield and White Horse Hill “ 2s oo Nuffield and Bagshot - “4” - “. ay Epwell and Stow - * - * ae Brill and Stow on the Wold - ny - THA Wendover and Bow Brickhill : = . a5 Kinsworth and Bow Brickhill _ - - 7 ot Shotover and White Horse Hill =5~ 2 £ — Epwell and Brill = rete - - er Bow Brickhill and Brill = - - 4 a Trigonometrical Survey. a7 Ant. xiv. Particulars respecting the Altitudes of ihe Stations. The height of the station on Trevose Head, above the surface of the sea at low water, was determined in 1797, by levelling. The transit instrument was used for the purpose; and there is reason to believe the result, 274%. feet, is within a very few inches of the truth. In the Philosophical Transactions for 1797, p. 4'71, the height of the station on Maker Heights is said to be 402 feet; this was also found by levelling. The altitude of St. Agnes Beacon, deter- mined from that station, is 599 feet; (see the same volume and page;) but, if the calculation be made from the base of alti- tude at Trevose Head, the height of that station, above the level of the sea, will be 621 feet, which gives a difference of 22 feet. It must be recollected, however, that in the first result, the com- putation was carried through two intermediate stations, which gave three arcs, and as many mean refractions; and, consider- ing the extreme variableness to which refractions are liable, we are assuredly not to consider 22 feet deviation from the truth as a large quantity. Besides St. Agnes Beacon, the altitudes of Cadon ee Brown Willy, Hensbarrow, and Bodmin Down, have been de- termined from that of Trevose Head. Of the remaining stations, some are derived from Maker Heights, others from Dunnose : most of them are mean results, that is, each station has gene- rally been found two ways; and, as it will serve to shew what errors proceed from irregularity of refraction, and imperfection of observation, I shall exhibit a few particulars in relation to them. MDCCC, ~ 4 Z 718 The Account of a Height of deduced from Feet. Maker Heights = 1 169 Mean. Black Down 1160 Carraton Hill - - 1152 Black Down - 609 St. Stephen’s Down 605 Carraton Hill - 600 Bradley Knoll - 779 Westbury Down 775 Beacon Hill ~ abe i 4 i Mendip Hills - 703 Farley Down 700 | Westbury Down - 696 Mendip Hills - = 335 Moor Lynch | 339 Ash Beacon - 325 Dundon Beacon - 46 Lugshorn Corner 49 Greylock’s Foss-way 52 Highclere - - 1014 Inkpin Beacon 1011 Beacon Hill ~ 1009 Bull Barrow ~ - 653 Ash Beacon 655 Bradley Knoll - 657 The above will sufficiently shew, what dependence is to be placed on the heights deduced from observed angles of eleva- tion or depression; the results are, indeed, often less consistent, and frequently unsatisfactory; but, generally, they run on a parallel with these. ‘The data from which all the heights have been computed, accompany this article. The measurement of the base on Sedgemoor, shewed a fall of about 7 feet, from Lugshorn Corner to Greylock’s Foss-way : Trigonometrical Survey. 719 therefore, supposing that fall to be gradual and constant, all the way from the latter station to the surface of the sea at Bridge- water Bay, we shall get 24 feet, for the height of Lugshorn Corner from the surface of the sea. The altitude of this sta- tion, deduced from that of Trevose Head, is 49 feet ; and, sub- tracting 9 feet from it, (the height of the bank on which the instrument stood above the moor,) we get 46 feet for the height of the moor at Lugshorn Corner, above the level of the sea at Bridgewater Bay. But this height, supposing the fall regular, is proved to be 24 feet. There is, therefore, a difference of 22 feet, granting the whole of this to be an error on the side of the survey: but, as the general surface of the moor at Bridgewater Bay is several feet above the surface of the sea, we may take a moiety of 24, feet, for the error of the computed height of the station at Lugshorn Corner. : Art. xiv. Matters relaling to Refraction. The refractions contained in this account, like those in our former Papers, tend to prove, that when rays of light pass hori- zontally, and considerably distant from the surface of the earth, they are less bent or refracted from their rectilinear courses, than theory and opinion have laid down as fact. It is very cer- tain, however, that objection lies against particular conclusions drawn from such data as we possess; because the angles of elevation and depression of corresponding stations are observed at different times, and almost always, therefore, under different circumstances ; but, with the experience and continual practice of thus obtaining means of computing these refractions, although we may not be able to determine the refracting power of the air under given circumstances, yet, as the causes which render 422 720 The Account of a it variable, are as likely to predominate when the angles of de- pression or elevation are observed from low stations as when observed from high ones, we may be enabled to make some general deductions.* | | When the instrument formerly made use of by General Rox was intrusted to my care, I possessed the means of deter- mining, in a more accurate manner than had yet been done, the refractive power of the air near the horizon. . To devote much time to it, has not, as yet, been in my power; because a more rapid extension of the survey was an object of greater * As many instances of strong atmospherical refraction have been related, and inge- niously accounted for, in some of the late publications of the Royal Society, I think it right to mention, by way of note, a very extraordinary instance of its variability. In the month of June, 1795, when the instrument and party were. stationed at Pilsden Hill, in Dorsetshire, on a particular day, at about the hour of four, I em ployed myself in observing the angles of depression or elevation of the surrounding hills. After I had done all that was necessary in this matter, I turned the telescope to Glastonbury Tor, and observed the depression of it. ‘The air was so unusually clear, that, desirous of proving to a gentleman then with me in the observatory tent, the excellence of the telescope, I desired him to apply his eye to it: this he did, and, agrees ably to a desire he expressed, I again took the depression of the upper part of the old building, which I was enabled to do with gréat accuracy, and found it 2” different ; the first being 30',0’, and the last 39',2”. The unusual distinctness of this object, led me to keep my eye along time at the telescope ; and, whilst my attention was engaged, I perceived the top of the building gradually rise above the micrometer wire, and so continue to do, till it was elevated 10',45” above its first apparent situation ; it then remained stationary, and as night drew on, the object became indistinct. The follow- ing evening, I observed the depression again, and found it 29’,50”. To what cause this extraordinary change in the refraction could be owing, I am at a loss to conjecture. The former part of the day had been warm, with little wind, and cloudy. The thermos meter, at the time of observation, was 65°, and continued stationary for a considerable time. The sky was cloudy, but yet, as I have before observed, the air was remarkably clear. The top of Glastonbury Tor, I suppose, is about 200 feet from the surface of Sedgemoor, over a considerable tract of which, the line joining Pilsden with that object passes. The gentleman of whom I speak, as being with me in the tent, was Captain Darcy, of the Royal Engineers, who, no doubt, well remembers the circumstance. | Trigonometrical Survey. 721 importance, I did not, however, lose any opportunity which the subsequent season offered; the first was, when the instruments were at White Horse Hill and Whiteham Hill; the second, when one was stationed at Brill and the other at Arbury Hill; and the third op- portunity offered itself, when one party was stationed at the latter place and the other at Wendover. On these occasions, the instructions which I communicated to Mr. Wootcort, and by which I governed myself, were to observe the elevation or depression of the corresponding station at the expi- ration of every hour, beginning at six A. M. and to have the watch well regulated from observed altitudes of the sun’s limb. I requested him also to be very minute in entering on his book the state of the weather; to keep the instrument properly sheltered from the wind ; to be always cautious to adjust his level; and also to insert the state of the air, as to temperature and density, by noting the thermometer and barometer. During the time we were at the two first stations, White Horse and Whiteham Hills, there was only one day when the air was suf- ‘ficiently clear for the purpose; this was the 6th of June. On that day, the following observations were made at the same time as shewn by signal. Whitebam Hill. Sfune 6th, 1799. — Hours. |Wh. Horse ?hessec Thermo- Elevated. ter. meter. Bemeret. rh In. pts |Degrees, 3 6 4 29,730} 60,3 | Light airs at SW. Sun not shining; remarkably clear. . 4 6 24 29,724) 62,5 Ditte. Ditto ditto, 5 6 14 29,728] 58,7 Ditto. Ditto ditto. 6. 6 Io 29,732] 5855 Ditto. Ditto ditto. 7 6 11 29,728] 5735 Ditto. Ditto . ditto. 8 6 21 29,7321 57 Very calm, and cloudy, but clear. #9 537 29,736] 55.7 Ditto. Lamp at Shotover very bright, Dew falling. #10 5 39 29,740] 55,5 Ditto. Ditto. The Account of a White Horse Hill. fune 6th. a Hours. Depressed. ter. meter. In. pts.| Degrees. 3 18 21 |29,412) 5757 4 | 18 16 29,408) 59,5 5 18 24 | 29,410) 57,6 6 18 20 |29,412] §5,5 y) 18 25 © |29,412|) 5555 8 18 15 |29,438) 54,2 * 9 18 10 | 29,438) 5354 *1I0 18 25 |29,438) 53,2 Whiteham H, |Barome-|Thermo- Remarks. Light airs at SW. Sun not shining; very clear. Ditto. Ditto ditto. Ditto. Sun shining a little; not so clear. More wind. Sun not shining, and darker. Calm and cloudy. Quite calm, and a little dew falling. Ditto. Fine night. Lamp at Whiteham very distinct. Ditto, but lamp rather indistinct. Similar observations were also made when the instruments were at Brill and Arbury Hill: they were as follows. Arbury Hill. ‘Fuly 11th, 1799. Watch regulated. Brill, Barome-{Thermo- Remarks, Hobrs Depressed.| ter. meter. ” In. pts.|Degrees. SY gA.M.| 11 15 |29,180| 65 ,5 | Light airs at SW. Cloudy, but sun shining now and then. to Il 15 |29,200] 70 ,0 Ditto. Cloudy. 11 Il 15 | 29,200} 70 57 Ditto. Ditto. 12 11 6 |29,199| 70 ,2 Ditto. Ditto. 3P.M. 11 6 | 29,162] 68 ,o Ditto. Ditto. Very clear. 4 4 TO) 35 1 295108|| 7.2 ok Ditto. Sun shining a little, yet free from any tremor. *g 10 30 | 29,132] 63 ,0 Ditto. Lamp at Brill perfectly distinct. Brill on the Hill. 7fuly 11th, 1799. Watch regulated. Hours. Arbury H. |Barome-|Thermo- Depressed.| ter. meter. nk In. pts.|Degrees. gA.M.| 8 40 |29,10c} 61 0 10 8 36 | 29,210) 67 55 iM 8 36 | 29,210) 67 55 12 8 36 | 29,210] 65 5,0 3P.M.| 8 36 |29,210] 71 20 Ps. 8 46 29,250] 71 55 #9 8 48 |29,200} 61.75 Remarks. Light airs at SW. Appearances of rain from SW. Cloudy. Ditto. Clearer, but cloudy. Arbury Hill very distinct. Ditto. More cloudy and equally clear. [round,. The air remarkably clear and free from tremor. Cloudy all Ditto ditto. More cloudy. Ditto ditto. Not so cloudy. - The lamp at Arbury H. very bright. Avery fine quietnighte Trigonometrical Survey. 729 The next opportunity which offered, was at the former station and — ~ Wendover: the observations were as follows. Arbury Hill. ‘fuly 27th, 1799. Watch regulated. ‘Wendover.|Barome-|Thermo- Remarks Hours. ~ |Depressed.| ter. meter. oe In, pts.| Degrees. {and there. 12 8 28,728] 62 ,0 | Fresh wind from SW. Rather dark weatier, sun shining here Ll 2 I 12 3 | 28,734] 64 ,2 Ditto. . Airtremulous, ditto. 2 1Z 11 | 28,740) 64 50 Ditto, Ditto, ditto. 3 12 10 | 28,738] 63 45 Ditto. Air more steady, ditto. Clearer. 4 12 22 | 28,740) 64 50 Ditto. Very steady. Sun shining a little, 5 II 50 | 28,740| 64 ,2 Ditto. Ditto. Ditto, 12 17 | 28,740] 61 ,0 | Less wind, and the air very clear. Wendover perfectly distinct. Wendover. ‘Fuly 27th, 1799. Watch regulated. Hout | Arbory Bazan ero Remarks ny In. pts |Degrees 5 A.M.} 16 12 [29,030] 53 ,2 | Wind at SW, rather fresh; sun shining, and air very clear. 6 16 12 | 29,030] 53 ,0 Ditto, ditto. 7 15 26 | 29,030] 54 ,5 | Less wind, and the air very steady. Arbury Hill very distinct. 8 14 44 | 29,100}54 ,0| Little wind. Dew falling very fast. Ditto. Another opportunity for making contemporary observations occurred, when the parties were on Broadway Beacon and Epwell: I place them last, because I think them inferior to the others. Epwell. “Fune 26th, 1799. Watch regulated. Broadway B.|Ba -|Th = ae Bloat. a a ie Romarkse *% v In. pts.|Degrees. : : ‘ : 12 6 29,100| 60,5 | Wind SW. Cloudy. Much rain preceding night. 1P.M| 6 8 |29,100| 63,2 | Ditto, but calmer; sun not shining at Broadway. 2 6 12 | 29,208] 60,7 | Very calm, and-cloudy all round. 3 6 20 |29,100| 59,0 | Ditto. Appearances of rain in SW quarter. 4. 8 32 29,100| 57,5 | Foggy, but easily perceive the tent at Broadway Beacon. Broadway Beacon. ‘fune 26th, 1799. Watch regulated. Epwell. Ch - Bers Derctsicds ae Remarks. i Pr Degrees. - 2 19 0 57,5 | Light airs from SW. [Inclinable to rain. 3 Oey 5735 Ditto. Still more so. 4 IQ 3 57>5 Ditto, but misty. Barometer tube broken. 724, The Account of a To determine the refractions on the first arc, White Horse and Whiteham Hills, we have the distance between those stations == 88662,2 feet, which subtends an are of 14’ 32" nearly. To determine those on the second, we have the distance be- tween Brill and Arbury Hill == 146530 feet, subtending an arc of 24’ 3”,9: those on the third, Wendover and Arbury Hill, 210628 feet = 34! 35’; and, for finding the refractions from the two last tables, we have the distance from Broadway Bea- con to Epwell = 80611,4 feet, which subtends an arc of 13/11” nearly. The depressions and elevations were all taken to the ground, excepting those which are marked with asterisks. At White Horse Hill and Whiteham Hill, lamps were used at the hours of g and 10: they were also made use of at Arbury Hill and Brill at g o'clock. In the first instances, the lamps were placed (the centres of them) 14 feet from the bottoms of the respec- tive instruments; and in the last 2+ feet. The height of the transit telescope above the ground was always 5+ feet; therefore, an allowance must be made, at each station, for the angle which that space subtends at its corresponding one; this premised, the refraction will be found from one of the two following rules, viz. if A be the contained arc, and D d the ob- served depressions, the quantity answering to the refraction, R, will be expressed by 2s, or, if one of the angles should be an elevation, e, then R = mitas : these rules give the refractions in the following table. 725 StS S65) ot : fo} 6 [SS 96a) 25 6 ° ¢ ¢ 66 = V 19‘SS 96a fe) S Wd joLoS'6a) Se L, za i? os SOLE G65} = 9 NS 9's ‘ S SLG 6s) ; LTE °Q¢ ere “ g “s ‘ c ue ¢ ¢ ous ve Ss 2 99 ILS ae & |S*tg |g ‘8° i 19 eat a v 8°0 ‘ = PbS-66s | . — . G6s| — was = e *sqjd “ul g ‘sid ‘ut 0 a beet eee : ; ‘1B *JUOD °sid] , 5 E "212 *]U09 *s3d| : b “sid “DIR ¢ i Ny ULIOY TL ulo1eg ‘uoTqaeay sino}yy wis y woleg coated *sInOFL mI9y J, “‘woleg S uctiaeubiee ®siNO Fy “WOU TL “WIO1e ee *SINO Fy ‘lJandq pue uoorag ACID EOE ony“ TERY MA 29 [ET 8STOFT OTM ‘OD 'F *1aAOpua AA puR Ine Ainqiy Siyes ‘IH Ainqiy pur [lg “21 °Z ‘uoisaidagy pun uoyvaary fo sasup Suipaoasd aqy wodf punof suonov.ifay 5A MDCCC. 726 The “Account of a On examining the refractions obtained on the first arc, we perceive them to have been tolerably regular from g o'clock till 8; the mean being —2— part of the contained arc. The height of Whiteham Hill is 576 feet, and that of White Horse Hill 893 feet, above the level of the sea: the ray passes, there- fore, through a tract of air considerably elevated, as the country between the stations is, for the most part, flat and low. The air is not often clear enough, or sufficiently free from tre- mulous motions, for these delicate observations. On the present occasion, however, the state of it was highly fit for the purpose; and, as care was taken, I am of opinion an error of more than 3”, taking that of the arch of altitude into the account, cannot have obtained in any of the angles. The refractions at 9 and 10 o'clock are less than at the preceding hours; but this does not appear to have been owing to any change in the refractive power of the air throughout the whole extent of the ray, because the depression of Whiteham Hill, from the other station, varied little at those hours. These changes in the ob- served angles of elevation at Whiteham, ( 44,” and 42” being the differences, ) without corresponding ones at White Horse Hill, prove that some partial alteration, from floating strata, had taken place in the refraction near the former station. Whoever con- siders the matter, must perceive a case may be constructed in which this will take place, causing a great variation in one of the angles, whilst the other apparently remains the same: and this suggested the idea, that to afford any accurate conclusions in this way, a long series of observations would be necessary. It furthermore appears, that dew could not have caused these differences at Whiteham Hill, since the same cause would equally operate to vary the observed angles at White Horse Hill; but those remained nearly the same. Trigonometrical Survey. 727 The refractions on the second and third arcs, I consider as most accurate, on account of the great distance between the stations ; and also as more to be depended on, from the circum- stance of the ray generally passing 300 feet above the ground. The fourth arc affords another instance of the refraction varying at one station, and remaining constant at the other. This; no doubt, was owing to the intervention of ‘some partial stratum of air, nearer to: Epwell than Broadway Beacon. The refractions, deduced ‘from ‘these contemporary observations are certainly inconclusive. The mean refractions, (neglecting the fourth arc) brought under one point of view, will be as follows. Arcs. Barom. | Therm. ; in. pts. 1. White Horse Hill and Whiteham. | 734, = 4 2.925).5759 2. Arbury H. and Brillys first refracs,) 774. |= « |:2932] 67,8 3. Arbury Hill and Wendover. -. |. 28,8} 58,1 If the air had been in a quiescent state, previous to and also at the times when these observations were made, it might be expected that the differences of altitudes in the stations would be obtained, tolerably near the truth, barometrically. The re- marks in the tables appertaining to the first and second arcs, shew that such opportunities offered ; but those which belong to the third, prove the wind to have been fresh ; and, as the space between the stations which constitute the extremities of that arc is 34, miles, nearly, it is not to be expected that a true result should be obtained. The differences of altitudes of the stations constituting the extremities of the two first arcs, obtained by means of the observed angles of elevation and depression, as well 5A2 728 The Account, &c. as from the heights of the mercury in the barometer, will be as follows. | Arcs. Obs. Ang. _— Barom. Diff. . 1 317 282 835 2 60 15 Ab The little done on this subject, points out the necessity of doing more; it therefore remains with me to observe, that I shall lose no opportunity of employing the apparatus committed to my charge in the best and most diligent manner, both as relating to matters of refraction, and to all others connected with the Trigonometrical Survey. In the Introduction, page 540, it is stated that this Account would be comprized in three Sections, but it was afterwards thought more convenient to divide it into four, In Page 583, line penult. dele and Prittlewell. ——— 665, —- 14, for 1792, read 1772+ Lhilos. trans. MV)C CC. Plate RXV fies +5 " GS SEDGEMOUZoun. Nellore Gate + ok j %, Moorlyneh Gat 7 ¢ d re JShapwick Rhyne Conytlon Lurdon se : WeftEnd Creylocks TRCPA Drain : ; are SON EEN 4G hore Crpy eas ‘ : is sy (aes GeetaeN cara, jak cone - ‘Yy oe + WMiklleeov | | | pj MILE S 5 ; S 2, Miles: | | ” } - | Faris MDC CC Hate XXVML pes SAM Li 2 Us ‘KING’S SEDGEMOOR was Vi oe SE LEO Ee cneasumed the CON. Paldle ge Gute Z ‘ai Cee On Milton Cate + Stared Jt Gale + Ivor Lynch Moorlynch Cat th} ; sf FAO LS pnt = = = > ae “ re — — = : y a z Wap toD al / / S Compton Duron haprick Bliine Ze : POE: WeftEnd Grevlocks Fassu 4 Jan Z x \ 0 em Sedgemoor Chief) or principal Drain a ASE Livy 4 Mikron + Highhuam Foi Bank i \ a tiem - amt sae a : ats ae aaa ‘ - : yy ~~ eal 6 a ae + se (0 the URIGON OME TRMCAL SUhVEY, 1790. ZA Philos. trans. MVCCC. Hale XXNX p jee © White Horse Mill \ arley Down o Devizes Westbury Down o Frome | BN ; ea | i Lees, Wargreen | we Y VA 1 Barrow Dee by SS cons op FILAIN of the — Lrenipial . Langley the TRIGDNOMETRIVAL SURVEY, 1790. ¢ Chiles. Trans MYCCC Hale XX1X p28 & White Horse Tilt Bristol Cathedral 5 _ gq luunsitown Duniiy Beacon a= : y Sq Marley Down Inkpin Beacon ), Devizes i e Uighelere Beacons So Westbury Down Mendip % o Frome Long Knolls Moor Lynch - Grevlocks Fossnay Dundon BP selon dLugshorn Corner / oSomerton ¥ Dean Hill | )Xaeh Beacon \ Wingreen \ Mintern 36 ult Barrow: pal *Piteden Seale of thirty English Miles 10 a5 20 Parpendicular to Ui, | Brack Down | PUG E axe Aw ees « ; ay = aaesh - ‘ a ’ i Ne a se ln AURAL GN Aber Wr TES Ot Naas, om gE GP icy een inal enull Contenhon weet eee | ‘ if = pO © RAIN eT -sepeetatenes dite r > HTT E vag RRS EN ONE ARREST «ANI ARNE Tap Pree a ena AaNae mY, fas ‘ ) : oo . - J Thitos. ans MDC CC.L1atte XXX pj. 725 7 A Se aa “i 4 Wingrenw / / Dean Hill ST */ oe f He Fe / Ul Barrow 6 he ; Nee yp Fig. 1 Pi tcc oN | v Y ps ‘\ \ BLACK Down \ 4 | a Nine Barrow Down ns. Trans MDC CCL Dean Hill Wingreene Bull Barrow « BLACK Down Nine Barrow Down” DUNNOSE \ ; \ IT art Perea, HS aes tie ep LaNat, ce 30! hie Fa HraT Aaem Ty da DMPA egy ene VT IER, owt te Nays nett pes alice eal “ noe ~ wan fiat oe 1S See rm Siem he whe we cenlpe or yea 7 Yh, r ey, 4 y / iG the TRIGONOMETRIC UA ne AGNES BAC ON. Philos Trans MDC CC. ialeX¥NN pp. 728 & S e Ningreen ey < NS SS S y RY BS S Ss Minkern _» 0) 7 Lt ape = ena a Ce en: yh Black Doun heenelaelo 1) WMertlian oF Pra X Brown Willy x Nine Barrow Down a ee . 251 WROTE oc, sect EE AWA 7%; om a Voth Mevagesy ADMAIN ‘ BEACON. Yi IYI. 17GO. 179 shoving the DIRECTIONS: of the MERIDIANS at BLACK DOWN, BULTTERTON and SSACNES = PLAN of the PRINCIPAL TRIANGLES in the TRIGONOMETRICAL SURV Philos Trans MDC CC.PateXXNIL p. 728 a Ningreen \ 3 Meratian of Black Down Full Barrow Dunynton 9. 8 Litsden Hilt z S 8 S| Ss Canysand Beac Pi Exeter Cathedral \ 0 Golden lie Charton Common Yo 9 Ciuten Harrow e— Hlack Down Milton linn OT Peck. Downe Seridiun of S!dgnes Beacon \ ee # Lene . Tin oak Lown Firm Willy \ pila 2) eis | we Barrow Down / / \ Rippin Tor Ye Bodmin opie = ( A \ \ Flagstall on fh | Hemmerton Balt /Butterton Hild i Dip rll “Nnsbarrow | ! Plymouth / \/ ~Otfaker Heights Perpendinar te the Meridian of SEAynes Lenco =" = was ee Furland rs PP A Cee Ye Trantor 7 “Dea DILAN } = Hock off & 7 oMaragusty SBOLT MEAD Ay Opn. Lertimuy of / Mddvstone Tevgships mF Ltt Totes boa / ES Durvan f— SNE Seale of thirty English Miles ll » S*Pauls Bedford 3X Minsworth Wendover x Bagshot Heath Xs 25 senate, Scale of Thirty Lnglish Miles. Hope” oi» © 20 Lele ) tn THO, MEA CIMALN ELS DMEM EAE hy SD ESM Lg 0 TY FLAY aon Vhilos Trans MDC CCL ile XXX 72> Meridian of Greenwich oLekhanpsttad Gagebo é Hampficad JSevarndroog High Beech PO) TLL of tie RIN CTP ALT RTAN ELE St Vie TRLGONOMETHICAL STRVEV3 1797 - Philos. Trans MDC CC. Lite XXM 7725 Corley Hill * o Coventry Meridian of Durnnese @ Crouch Mill ratway Beacon a Arbury Hill Va Leighton Buzzarde a Quatnton Blenheim Obs ® ® NN ftchuin Hf. Buckddna 0 Oatordfi / CupinerH Britl » StPauls Bedford 4 Lidlington Park NN N aLiubler ith. Se Lilivhoe Wy Wigfield WhiteHorsc Hill SS 7 ——§ Sarachampy B Iakepin Heacon Hiahclere Beacon Ava Meridian of Greenwich Sea Learkhampstead Cat Hailey’ Bushy Steath Wanmore 2 hi unpficad anger Hill we bores Vor lhe ai 8, Li). Philos. trans MVC CC.P1aleXXXM py 728. O Otley | : « 1 . 9 Balsham - xlbridge © | : P| Se ZR shimere vy r ¢- ny Be TRI. INGLIS for the Survey of ESSIEN and pares Sthe ADJOINING COUNTIES, / YO], x Rakhamstead. Dbservarory \ A Westham SPtaulB—— Tower ~ ° Bromley ° Ueesdon Mill Greit{ Hadham ° pllighbeedh Sererndroog® Maton on MabruhamMount Bap eS Balsham x Triplow ° Shady Canps Ashidon © XGetmdon ~ \ ESS \ \ \ \ Rickling» Heaham | wthe aT Albury 5 ee A Felsteaafy Hatliel t Bre de kad Oak: / / fleshley Sa@uon on Gallywood Coom Se Epping Milt : s Frurnu © Stock (h yi, / a ZL Southweald ~—,, Brentwood Nwabiee eka A Mornchurh \Z (a Langdon Seat om 7 Graven? / / / Cadshill &— Rochester 2 ts Farninghan ° Orpingeon oo Meopham Shorham f, ° Gudham Wrotham Hill ® Sration 1798 ©D° 1797 \ © \ \Great Laghs\ Mot | Witharn\ eer ing Rettenden [raf | / Malstow Laver Marney fio) —Petdan © a Toleshunt Major Brain Alillinghamy © Purleigh yx ; 2 ls Southminster Ere: Prive Shocburvres Southend = Stati Tia the River R ygnal Stan Priory SOsvih stable Han 798.170). Philos Tris MU CCC. PlateXXXM. 1728. Q Orley Fatkenhaing oF Buvdecy, ) Felixstow oy Signal Stat) Linfftiard Fort Weel Walon Tower hr Sea Mark oWonkton 2 Sandwich Ramsgate oa ete temp ure ~ * { | a 1.746 sill haidmeertnbanatinincsnemdsiaanel q ‘ ' } 1 . | . ; ‘ , OEY ASRS ON Bhs aa + Cited "y Ay s : Pe. ‘ , i * +) ~ ¥ ad ys at ‘ iy Piiwe Fm , x * \ x ‘ a a * rh - c b 4 : | ; . ‘ my 2 ~~ * yl \ ) oa i i ‘ ’ } rj al } ; ‘. Fa ; ’ F Dien +! abv i anid au Ao - Poy “ PVG t¢g { § > ¢ ‘ : bd arity we. 7 wy * ’ VES) as Fe se " “Ve “f s 4 ~ TRIANGLES for Philos trans MDC CCLateXXXM py. ® Brook Si taple | | f Nonivod \) oN Pauds o Woolwich Greenwich Slaton Botley Hill Tnockhole Beeches Cowdar fo" — North fleet 5 TRIANGLES Jor thse SUPVEy Of he Northern Xk Western parts of KENT > G99. Liles. Trans. MDC CC. ateXXXM p72 8 Southend _ “oura of the RIVER Guard house © Gravesend aGravesend Slation jarttopa Otford Mount Stanon Shofoury-nefe Stal Vira Mk SSlanese ° Shs Jueehporough Minster Osh Gurch Wretham Hill Station Last Peckham i“ iG a L>— oBrenchley (Remarkable Tree Cnear Kibbens Croft 7 —< Oa Chimney of Star [nn \ [DeAtE at upper Pell Inn o Stockbury SMucking YA J oMedeorn Cy olroudhurst 2 Cranbrook Mieppey Staton = East Church NW hils table 6 ayn Bapohild ES aT rinstead ~ OMchlin = ep Shotterden Mill o Smarden i SCALE of twenty ENGLISH MILE Fy Co 8 o pages ed, ~ Margate S! Peters > ° 'f Monkton G o {Ramsgate oMinster i v ~ ° Sandwich \\ °Brook Staple \ fe Dealo 2 Sutton South Foreland o Ewell Minis Dover © a a ~* r . \ 7 2 ae ’ 7 * , / ve - . o i * ad ’ « ill "4 - i 4: 5 8 i » & " * * 5 ones - | ; o +. . ° p . . oe roe ‘ iY S aie - o Ly ee ee oan * ¢ : Vrdathectahe Paderio Da ieloadey J ~s ' 1799: PRESENTS RECEIVED BY THE ROYAL SOCIETY, From November 1799 to ‘fuly 1800; WITH THE NAMES OF THE DONORS. PRESENTS. Nov. 7. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles Lettres, 1794 et 1795. Berlin, 1799. 4° Transactions of the Society for the Encourage- ment of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce. Vol. XVII. London, 1799. 8° A third Dissertation on Fever. Part II. by G. Fordyce. London, 1799. 8° Catalogues of the Birds, Shells, and some of the more rare Plants of Dorsetshire. London, 1799. tol. View of the Russian Empire during the Reign of Catherine II. by W. Tooke. London, 1799. 3 Vols. ge Atlas Ceelestis, Tab. III. et V—XIV. Traité de Mécanique Celeste, par P. S. Laplace. Paris, An 7. Tomes II. 4° Exposition du Systéme du Monde, par P.S. Laplace. 2{¢ Edition. Paris, an 7. 4° Bibliotheque Britannique, No. 79—88. A Portrait of the late Mr. John Smeaton, painted by M. Brown. A, Comparetti, Observationes Optice de Luce in- flexa et Coloribus. Patavil, 1787. 4° Theorie. des Vents et des Ondes, par M. de a Coudraye. Copenhague, 1796. Nachricht von einer merkwiirdigen cs Betriigerey, von J. Hager. Erlangen, 1799. 4° Relation d’une insigne Imposture litteraire, par M. Hager. Erlang, 1799. 4° Memoir on the extraneous Fossils denominated Mammoth Bones, by G. Turner. Philadelphia, 1799. 4° DONORS. The Royal Academy of Sciences of Berlin. The Society for the En- couragement of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce. George Fordyce, M. D. F.R.S. Richard Pulteney, M. D. F.R.S. The Rev. William Tooke, FLRSS. ; Mr. J. E. Bode, F.R.S. M. Laplace, F.R. S. Professor Pictet, F. R.S. Alexander Aubert, Esq. F.R.S. Professor Comparetti, of Padua. Chev. de la Coudraye. Dr. Hager. Mr. George Turner. Nov. 14. Dee. 5- 12 I 1800. Fan. 9. 16, 23. [ 730 PRESENTS. The London Catalogue of Books. London, 1799. ge A Treatise on the Venereal Rose. London, 1799. 8° A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol- son. No. 29—33.. - A Series of Engravings to illustrate the Morbid Anatomy of the Human Body, by M. Baillie. Fascic. II. London, 1799. © 4° A complete System of Astronomy, by S. Vince, Vol. II. Cambridge, 1799. 4° Tabulz Neurologice, Auctore A. Scarpa. Ticini, 1794. » fol, Fragments of the Natural History of Pennsylvania, by B.S. Barton. Philadelphia, 1799. fol. Description d’une Amethyste du Cabinet des Pierres gravées de l’Empereur de toutes les Russies. St. Petersbourg, 1798. ge Pharmacopoea Borussica. Berolini, 1799. 4° Nouvelles Tables Trigonométriques, par J. P. Hobert et L. Ideler. Berlin, 1799. 8° Annals of Medicine for the Year 1798, by A. Duncan, sen, and A. Duncan, jun. Vol. III. Edinburgh, 1799. 8° Etchings, representing the best Examples of ancient ornamental Architecture, by C, H. Tatham. London, 1799. fol. An Essay on the Preservation of shipwrecked Ma- riners, by A. Fothergill. London, 1799. 8° Courbes décrites par des Projectiles dans les Milieux résistans, calculées par le Lieut. Gen, Komar- zewsky. MS. A general View of the Nature and Objects of Che- mistry, by W. Henry. -Manchester, 1799. 8° A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol- son. No. 34. g. Bibliotheque Britannique. No. 8g, go. A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol- son. No. 35. Memoirs of the Medical Society of London, Vol.V. London, 1799. 8° Experiments with the Metallic Tractors, edited by B. D. Perkins. London, 1799. 8° Of the Imagination as a Cause, and as a Cure of Disorders of the Body, exemplified by fictitious Tractors, by J. Haygarth. Bath, 1800. 8° Observations on the Cure of the curved Spine, by J. Earle. London, 1799. 8° Ar Essay on the Means of lessening the Effects of Fire on the Human Body, by J. Earle. London, 1799- 8° Pantographia, by E. Fry. London, 1799. 8° DONORS. Mr. William Bent. William Butter, M. D. Mr. William Nicholson, Matthew Baillie, M. D. IO SP The Rev. Samuel Vince, A.M. F.R.S. Professor Scarpa, F.R.S. Professor Barton, of Phi- ladelphia. Mr. Koehler, of Peters- ~ burg. Professor Formey, and Professor Klaproth, F.R.S. Professor Hobert, and M. Ideler. ° Andrew Duncan, sen. M. D. and Andrew Duncan, jun. M. D. Mr. Charles. Heathcote Tatham. Anthony Fothergill, M.D. F.R.S. Lieut. General Komar- zewsky, F.R. S. Mr. William Henry. Mr. William Nicholson. Professor Pictet, F.R.S. Mr. William Nicholson, The Medical Society of London. Mr. B. D. Perkins. John Haygarth, M, D. F.R.S. James Earle, Esq. F.R.S. Mr. Edmund Fry. Feb. 6, Feb. 13. 20. 27. Mar. 6. "3 276 April 3. 24. E 7gt J PRESENTS. Prospectus of the Royal Institution of Great Bri- tain. London. 8° The Cambrian Register for the Years 1795 Ane 1796. London, 1796, 1799. Bibliotheque Britannique. No. 91—94. A Meteorological Journal of the Year 1799, ae in London by W. Bent. London. A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol. son. No 36, A Translation of the Table of Chemical Nomen clature, proposed by de Guyton, Lavoisier, Ber- tholet, and Fourcroy. London, 1799. 4° Philosophie de l’Univers. 3me edition. Paris, an 7. 8° Nova Acta Academiz Scientiarum Imperialis Pe- tropolitane, Tom. XI. Petropoli, 1798. 4° Abhandlung, wie mit neuerfundenen Luftwechsel- maschinen die auf Bergwercken vorkommenden bésen Wetter wegzuraumen sind, bey C. Wisi ~ Bobert. St. Petersburg, 1797. Transactions of the Linnean Society. Vol. v, London, 1800. A Series of Engravings to illustrate the Morbit Anatomy of the Human Body, by M. Baillie. Fascic. III. London, 1800. 4° The History of the Helvetic Confederacy, in 2 Vols. London, 1800. Transactions of a Society for the Improvement ? Medical and Chirurgical Knowledge. Vol. II. London, 1800. 8° Bibliotheque Britannique. No. 95, 96. Account of Antiquities discovered at Ribchester, by C. Townley. fol. General View of the Agriculture of the County of Westmoreland, by A. Pringle. Edinburgh; 3794s C. P. Thunberg, Dissertatio de Erica, curante R. A. Salisbury. Featherstone, 1800. 4° Annals of Medicine for the Year 1799, by A. Duncan, sen. and A. Duncan, jun. Vol. IV. Edinburgh. 8° The Naturalist’s and Traveller’s Companion, by J. C. Lettsom. 3d edition. London, 1799. 8° Medical Facts and Observations. Vol. VIII. Lon- don, 1800. 8° Observations on a Tour through the Highlands of Scotland, by T. Garnett. London, 1800. 2 Vols. 4° A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol. son. No. 38. Plants of the Coast of Coromandel, by W. Rox- burgh, Vol. II. No. z. DONORS. The Managers of the Royal Institution. John Symmons, Esq. « Sp ee Pictet, F.R.S. Mr. William Bent. Mr. William Nicholson. George Pearson, M. D. F.R.S. M.Du Pont,del’Institut. National de France. The Imperial Academy of Sciences of Peters- burg. ee ee, ee ee The Linnean Society. Matthew Baillie, M. D. F.R.S. Joseph Planta, Esq. Sec. R. S. The Society for the Im- provement of Medical and Chirurgical Know- ledge. Professor Pictet, F.R.S. The Society of Anti- quaries. George Chalmers, Esq. F.R. S. Richard Anthony Salis- bury, Esq. F. R.S. Andrew Duncan, sen. M. D. and Andrew Duncan, jun. M. D. John cone Lettsom, M. Dik R. S:. Samuel Fo oart Simmons, M. D. F.R. S. T. Garnett, M. D. Mr. William Nicholson. Court of Directors of the East India Company, May 1. 15. . A. Comparetti, Observationes anatomice de Aure 29. Fune iQ. 26. Fuly 3. . The Duty of not running into Debt ; [ 732 J PRESENTS. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Vol. V. Part. I. 1799. Flora Britannica, auctore J. E. Smith. Vol. I. and II. London, 1800. 8° A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol- son. No. 39. a Discourse, preached before the University of ret London, 1800. Observations on the Northern Circumpolar Ri. gion, by F. Wollaston. London, 1800. 4° interna comparata. Patavii, 1789. 4° Observations on the Effects of various Articles of the Materia Medica in the Cure of LuesVenerea, by J. Pearson. London, 1800. 8° Seventeen Reports of the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the State and Condition of the Woods, Forests, and Land Revenues of the Crown. Ordered to be printed 1792 and 1793. 2 Vols. ol. History of Russia, by W. Tooke. London, 1800. z Vols. 8° Beweis dass Johann Mayow den grund zur an- tiphlogistischen chemie gelegt hat, von J. A. Scherer. Wien, 1793. 8° Memorials on the Medical Department of Naval Service, by W. Renwick. Portsea, 1800. 8° Royal Humane Society. Annual Report, 1800. London. 8° Letters from the Cardinal Borgia, and the Cardi- nal of York, 1799, 1800. 4° New Observations concerning the Colours of thin transparent Bodies. London, 1800. 8° Persian Lyrics, or scattered Poems, from the Di- wan-i-Hafiz. London, 1800. A? A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol- son. No. 40 "The Doctrine of Phlogiston established, and that of the Composition of Water refuted, by J Priestley. Northumberland, 1800. Compendium Flore Britannice, auctore J. = Smith. Londini, 1800. 8° A. H. Macdonald, Disputatio inaug. de Necrosi ac Callo. Edinburgi, 1799. 8° Memoranda of the State if the Thermometer at Sidmouth, Devonshire, from Dec. 11. 1799 to Apr. 15, 1800. MS. 4° An Introduction to Harmony, by William Shield. London, 1800. A Journal of Natural Philosophy, by W. Nichol: son, No. 41. A DONORS. The Royal Society of Edinburgh. James Edward Smith, M. D. F. R.S. Mr. William Nicholson. The Rev. George Whit- more, B. D. F.R.S. _ The Rey. Francis Wol- laston, LL.B. F.R.S. Professor Comparetti of Padua. Mr. Pearson. Sir John Call, Bart. F,R. TheRev.WilliamTooke, F.R.S. The Rev. Herbert Marsh, B. D. Mr. William Renwick. The Royal Humane So- ciety. Sir John Cox Pi shee Bart. F.R.S$ Gibbes Walker Jordan, Esq. F. R.S. John Haddon Hindley, Esq. Mr. William Nicholson. The Rev. Joseph Priest- ley, LL. D. F. R.S. James Edward Smith, M. D. F.R.S. Alexander Herman Mac- donald, M. D. White Melville, Esq. William Shield, Esq. Mr. William Nicholsons INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS FOR THE YEAR 1800. A 7 page Acrp, carbonic, remarks on, - a = - 202 —- fluoric, remarks on, - - - - 202 - muriatic, experiments to decompose it, - ~ 188 Air, on the quantity of it discharged through an aperture, = 107 on the direction and velocity of a stream of it, - 109 Albumen, experiments on, - - - 375» 387, 396 Alcyonium, experiments on various species of, - 354, 364 Antipathes, experiments on various species of, - 351, 364 _ Arteries, on a peculiarity in those of slow-moving animals, L Astronomy, physical, second appendix to the improved solution of a problem in, 3 % 4 a 86 B Barker, Tuomas, Esq. Abstract of a register of the barometer, thermometer, and rain, at Lyndon, in Rutland, for the year 1798, = Barometer, Register of, at Lyndon, in Rutland, - - Birds, on their organ of hearing, - = - 6, a Blood, remarks on, = = x = 401 Bradypus didactylus, remarks on its arteries, - - 100 - tridactylus, remarks on its arteries, - - 99 Brig hiness, remarks on, - - - 51 C Candle, on the reflection of its heat, - = - 297 on the refraction of its heat, - 308 Car.iste, Mr. ANTHONY. Account of a peculiarity in 1 he distribution of the arteries sent to the limbs of slow-moving ani- mals; together with some other similar facts, - = 98 Cartilage, experiments on, - - - - 383 Cavities, sonorous, observations on, - - - 116 Chords, on their vibrations, = = Me is 134 Cochlea of the Ear, remarks on, - - - 18 MDCCC. 5B INDEX. ; page Coorer, Mr. Astiey. Observations on the effects which take 7 place from the destruction of the membrana tympani of the ear, 1 5t Corallina Opuntia, experiments on, - - 334, 362 Cruickshank, Mr. on the matter remaining after the explosion of gunpowder, - - - = “ 237 E Ear, on its membrana tympani, = = = 1, 1514 on the uses of its different parts, 4 2 ns Eel, electrical, on its electric apparatus, - - 429 Electricity, its effect on carbonic acid, - - ~ 202 on fluoric acid, 4 > a 202 on muriatic acid, = = a 190 on that excited by the contact of conducting substances, 403 Elephant, on its organ of hearing, a = = 2,19 F . Feather, experiments on, - = = > 372 Fire-beat, on its reflection, - - = 300, 305 on its refraction, = - - 311, 315 on its transmission, = ~ = 476, 524 Fish, experiments on their light, atl = i 163 on their organ of hearing, - - - 15 Flame-heat, on its transmission, ms = - 462, 524 Fluids, elastic, on the vibrations of different ones, = 124 Flustra foliacea, experiments on, - - 334, 362 Focus, on that of the rays of heat, = — = - - 444 G Gas, muriatic acid, effects of electricity on it, + a 190 effects of electrifying it with inflammable sub- stances, - - - - = 194 Gelatin, remarks on, = 2 = 366, 376, 396 Glow-worms, experiments on their light, ~ ~ 178, 180 Gorgonia, experiments on various species of, =i; 338, 362 Gunpowder, comparison of its strength with that of fulminating mercury, - miaris - - 207, 236 on the matter remaining after its explosion, - 237 lo Hair, remarks on, = - - - 371 Hartcuett, Cuarwes, Esq. Chemical experiments on zoo- phytes; with some observations on the component parts of _ membrane, - - - - aap i Heat, on its different refrangibility, - - 255, 271, 438 on the solar and terrestrial rays which occasion it, 293, 437 INDEX. 5Be2 page Heat, on the laws to which it is subject, ~ 296 on the reflection of that of the sun, - 296, 298, 302 ee of that of a candle, - - 297 — — of that of hot iron, - ~ 299, 306 nee - of that of fire, - 300, 305 —— on the refraction of that of the sun, - 284, 308, 310, 317 _—— of that of a candle, - - 308 —— of that of fire, ~ - 311, 315 —— of that of hot iron, - 313, 319 —— on the focus of its rays, ' ~ - - 444 —— on the transmission of heat-making rays, - 445, 520 — of terrestrial flame-heat, = 462, 524 — — of the solar heat which ts of equal re- peneiellity with red rays, - ~ 470, 520 of that ae fire, - “ 476, 524 —— of invisible solar heat, 2 485, 520 fees ——_—_————. of invisible terrestrial heat, - 490, 524 —— on its transmission through colourless substances, ~- 449 — —=—_—_—_-—- through coloured glasses, - 453 —_— through liquids, - ! 456 — through scattering substances, -~ 458 —— on the scattering of solar heat, - 497 whether it be occasioned by the same rays as light, or by dif- ferent ones, - - 506 Heavens, on the time it would take t to sweep them, = 84 He Luins, THE Rev. Joun. A second appendix to the improved solution of a problem in physical astronomy, inserted in the Phi- Josophical Transactions for the year 1798, containing some further remarks, and improved formule for computing the coefficients A and B; by which the arithmetical work is considerably shortened and facilitated, - - - - 86 Henry, Mr. Wittiam. Account of a series of experiments, un- dertaken with the view of decomposing the muriatic acid, - 188 Hrerrings, experiments on their light, - 163 Herscuer, Wittiam, LL.D. On the power of penétrating into space by ‘telescopes ; with a comparative determination of the extent of that power in natural vision, and in telescopes of va- rious sizes and constructions ; illustrated by select observations, 49 SS Investigation of the powers of the prismatic colours to heat Ne illuminate objects; with remarks, that prove the different refrangibility of radiant heat. To which is added, an inquiry into the method of viewing the sun advan- tageously, with telescopes of large apertures and high magnifying powers, - - = - - 255 INDEX. age Herscuer, Wittiam, LL.D. Experiments on the refrangibility i of the invisible rays of the sun, > . - - 284 —_—_— Experiments on the solar, and on the terrestrial rays that occasion heat; with a comparative view of the laws to which light and heat, or rather the rays which occa- sion them, are subject, in order to determine whether they are the same, or different, - - “. - 293, 437 Home, Everarp, Esq. The Croonian Lecture. On the structure -- and uses of the membrana tympani of the ear, es — 1 Some additional remarks, on the mode of hearing in cases where the membrana tympani has been de- stroyed, - - - - - 159 Some observations on the head of the Ornithorhynchus paradoxus, - - - 432 Hoof, experiments on, - - - - 374 Horn, experiments on, = ie = - 372 Horse, remarks on its membrana tympani, - - 6 Howarpb, Epwarp, Esq. Ona new fulminating mercury, 204 Hume, Natuaniet, M.D. Experiments and observations on the light which is spontaneously emitted, with some degree of. permanency, from various bodies, - - - 161- I Illuminating power, on that of coloured rays, ~ < 262 Images, on double ones caused by atmospherical refraction, - 239 Iron, bot, on the reflection of its heat, - - 299, 306 on the refraction of its heat, 4 = 313, 319 — on the transmission of its heat, we 490, 524 Isis, experiments on various species of, - - 335, 362 L, Latitude, on that of various places, - 624, 644, 649, 655, 661 Lecture, Croonian, Pe ~ - - - 1 Lemur Loris, remarks on its arteries, ee = - 100 tardigradus, remarks on its arteries, - = 98 Lig bt, experiments and inquiries respecting it, - - 106 - on the analogy between it and sound, - - 125 - on the laws to which it is subject, - ~ 295 whether it be occastoned by the same rays as heat, or by different ones, - 5 - adie 506 - on the transmission of terrestrial scattered light through va- rious substances, - - - 528 ——-- on the scattering of terrestrial light by various substances, §33 ——- spontaneous, experiments and observations on the kind of light so called, ~ - - - 161 INDEX. page Light, spontaneous, on the degree of putrescence necessary for its emission, - a - - 163 ——- On its separation and preservation, 165, 171 —- —————_ 0 its extinction and revivification, 171,47, —- ———-——- effects of motion on it, - - 175 —- ——-———_ does not affect the thermometer, - 176 —- ——_——- effects of cold on it, = = £97 ——- — of heat on it, ~ - 179 - —- of the human body and animal fluids on it, = a = — ra 184 Lion, remarks on its carotid artery, = Es 102 Longitude, on that of various places, - 624, 644, 649, 655, 661 Luminous bodies, remarks on, E 49 M Mackerels, experiments on their light, “noses - 164 Madrepora, experiments on various species of, - 329, 360 Magnifying power, remarks on, = - - 8 Membrana tympani, on its structure and uses, - - 1 on the effects arising from its destruction, 151, 159 Membrane, observations on its component parts, - 327, 366 Mercury, fulminating, on a new one, - - 204 method of preparing it, “ 205, 214 — effects of concussion on it, = 206 —_—___—____ effects of electrical shocks on it, - 206 . temperature at which it explodes, - 207 ee comparison of its strength with that of gun- ‘powder, - - = - 207, 236 on its constituent principles, - 216 - on its characteristic properties, 230, 237 Miillepora, experiments on various species of, © - 331, 362 Morean, Witi1am, Esq. On the method of determining, from the real probabilities of life, the values of contingent reversions in which three lives are involved in the survivorship, - 22 Munpece, Caprain Wicxtiam. An account of the trigonome- trical survey, carried on in the years 1797, 1798, and 1799, by order of Marquis Cornwallis, Master-General of the ordnance, 539 Muscular fibre, experiments on, - - -, 391 N Nail, iron, remarks on its appearance in a microscope, 2 263 —— human, experiments on, 2 d a 374 Nicholson, Mr. Remarks on his opinion respecting the electric apparatus of the torpedo, &c. - ~ - 429 INDEX. age O pant: 298 Ornitborbyncbus paradoxus, observations on its head, a 432 | Pipes, on their harmonic sounds, - “ “ 121 Plates, on their vibrations, - = e ~ 140 Poker, bot, on the reflection of its heat, ~ = 299, 306 Presents received by the Royal Society, from November 1799 to July 1800, - - q = = P29 Prismatic colours, experiments on their heating power, « 256 ————— experiments on their illuminating power, 262 —_———— on the reflection of the heat that accompanies them, - = - = be * 298 —————-—-— onthe refraction of the heat that accompanies them, 310 : R Rain, register of, at Lyndon, in Rutland, - 2 - 46 Rays, on the solar and terrestrial ones that occasion heat, 293, 437 —-— on the heating power of coloured ones, - - 256 —-— on the illuminating power of coloured ones, = 262 —-— on the reflection of invisible ones, e = 302, 304 —-— on the refraction of invisible ones, - 284, 317; 319 —-— on the condensation of invisible ones, - 304, 317 —-— on the different refrangibility of those of heat, it 271, 438 —-— on the focus of those of heat, = St ee 444 —-— on the transmission of heat- making ones, _ "445, 520 —— ——— of invisible ones, - 405, 520 —-— whether light and heat be occasioned by the same, or by different ones, - - - - - 506 Refraction, atmospberical, on double images caused by it, - 239 oo extraordinary instance of, - 720 Reversions, contingent, on determining the values of those in which three lives are involved in the survivorship, - - 22 Rods, on their vibrations, 6 Bs . . 140 S Scale, horny, experiments on, = - - - 374 Scales of fish, experiments on, - - -"% 373 Shells, observations on, - = - - 3275 357 Skin, experiments on, - - - - 369, 378 Silver, on a fulminating one, - - - - 233 Soap, Chaptal’s, remarks on, - - - - 392 Sound, experiments and inquiries respecting it, - - 106 —--— ocular evidence of its nature, = - ~ 115, —-— on its velocity, : : . rs . 116 INDEX, page Sound, on sonorous cavities, : - - E 116 —-— on its divergence, - . - - 118 on its decay, - - = - 120 —-— on the harmonic sounds of pipes, - - 121 —-— on the vibrations of different elastic fluids, = 124 —-— on the analogy between light and sound, - - 125 on the coalescence of musical sounds, - - 130 —--— on the frequency of vibrations constituting a given note, 133 —--— on the vibrations of chords, - - - 134 —--—— on the vibrations of rods and Pits - - 140 on the human voice, - - 141 —-— on the temperament of nftisieat intervals, - 143 Space, on penetrating into it by telescopes, - - 49, 64 Sponge, experiments on various species of, - - 352, 364 Sun, on viewing it advantageously, 2 - 255, 273 on the refrangibility of its invisible rays, - - 284 See Heat and Rays. Survey, trigonometrical, carried on in the years 1797, 1798, and 1799, account of, = bins ta LgAG - 539 — particulars RENE to the operations of the year 1797, - - - 542 — ——_——. angles len in the year 1797, - 549 nn particulars relating to the operations of the year 1798, - - - - 555 — ——-—-—— angles taken in the year 1798, 559 _ —— —— particulars elaine to the operations of the year 1799; ; 563 —————--——_-—— _ angles taken in the year 1799) = 569 ———_—_————-— situations of the stations, : 576 ———— particulars relating to the base on Sedgemoor, 584 _— — principal triangles, - 588, 677, 702 —_————____— secondary triangles, - 610, 689, 703 —— latitudes and longitudes of various places, 624, 644, 649, 655, 661 —_____-_——_— bearings of the stations from various paral- lels, : - - - 643, 653 ——__.-—_—_—__ ——_ bearings of intersected objects from various parallels, - - - 645, 657 ——_—_. ————. survey of the northern and western parts of Kent, Essex, &c. - - - 676 ——_—__—_—_ altitudes of the stations, - 7103 717 mean terrestrial refractions, - 715, 719 Survivorship. See Reversions. : ié INDEX. é ni pag Tadpoles, experiments on their light, - - 168 Tanning principle, remarks on, na a A 382 Telescopes, on penetrating into space by them, - 49, 64 on their magnifying power, - - é 68 on viewing the sun advantageously with mie 255, 273 experiments with them, - - 277 Temperament, on that of musical intervals, 4 - 143 Thermometer, register of, at Lyndon, in Rutland, : - 46 Thermometers, on their sensibility, “ - - 447 Torpedo, remarks on its electric apparatus, ~ 416, 429 Tortoise shell, experiments on, = - FS 375» 397 Trig onometrical survey. See Survey. Tubipora musica, experiments on, - - - 333, 362 Vv Vibrations, on those of different elastic fluids, - - 124 - on the frequency of those constituting a given note, 133 - on those of chords, - - - 134 - on those of rods and plates, - - 140. Vision, observations on, - - aI - 49 Voice, human, remarks on, - - - : 141 Votta, Mr. ALExanpeER. On the electricity excited by the mere contact of conducting substances of different kinds, - 408 WwW Weather of 1798, remarks on, - - - - 47 Willow, remarks on its bark, - - - - 382 Wottaston, Witt1am Hype, M.D. On double images caused by atmospherical refraction, - - - 239 Wood, shining, experiments on its light, - - 1775-179" Y Yolk of egg, remarks on, ~ 389 Youne, Tuomas, M. D. Outlines of experiments and i squires _respecting sound and light, - - - - 106 Z Zoopbytes, chemical experiments on, a jtsied «ne - 327 From the Press of a W. BULMER & Co. Cleveland-Row, St. Fames’s. AO a * ~ —~ ) ~2zr ae x a DAA RNA Bn! 1) Ye | lL ~s Ay f amare DDD a Ber: amd > 1A Oe N m ~ mnathaeaen.&.2h VAAANI A AE SARE ~ ‘Qa aA, wae ee yy TRIAL ye niaalt Lae YP ARREAAE YY Oty WNL yn & a ise wa oe a oe ; ’ ~ =a Na as a ee o .’ aim a> ~ boa = GAR2 S52 Ton ee a oN fs ~ Rn OT mm Paptaane aRanrla’ 2 ADR AAANAD Ale AN gO me LYVY —— ‘ < eta == ¢ a S232 > Aa ee NAA ARAT aA ae ad ~ < {Se Ras: . . Am SE St S =~ » | x . => bi A 3 =~ RBARAR OE Nia AA ~\ a* mNep MN NYY Qn AA (~ ARR Deli ge PRA a ABR ABARAAPR a = a e palatal = aanaaKnlr -PRmRARARRARAAL a . so 7 VWAAt i as aAdme ion ae ~~ a & wf -—_™~ — i> ~ oN a ww ; : . 7 \aAAeiae ag lO - PAA | e_| ~L Se Rm ONES pn RE AA AA’ a: er CFRPAA "Sy x] mt ‘ aa ~*~ PNG eN & : ._ = , ma NAA | A PAAR, LAY al Aa NN NAA PAanS a AR \ aay _¥_N RAD AS aR lan ~g\ s RA, rN ~~) BSS EE A om z , Vas * ~ am AAAS SA : a ~\ eS é P a ~ ot a aA ea , Na Aa —, Tw aor a> ~— aN a a2 Ravana Na Aiea AlaaaZh mR Ae Gna = Pes ~* = . _ = By > a = nae Ag AR Ap SOR NAR Nae AL AAAKANAA Athans _" a’ Pr A a BAD AQ 2 PA NOS AR AAAARAAAAG anna! oA gnnenene itt: me AT ARAAR AANA ~~ 4 —” ~- N Naan, AAMA, a A Az. amnnannns WAAARa m2 aaa a A sgnrn A! AsanagamnamnaannnasA=s ARS: eo ae. Vo a A ~ eee comm annnnannananny Tok Saccenaaal! PY ol alalen in Tole tt] AL | RRAAA Naam Waa AAS2 VAAN a | so RGRAAREOR-AAranes 2’ : leiieleclalel \wi-Llel bin | aay om ~ ie tale = : an NA vw 2s 5 an =. a ; 53. dy ; : ! : : ‘ ~a™N >, iN BRERA AQAA 2 BS sADGAAt NA nAsassaala,® ae AAA AN. » aan a a } » > BD! ) PD WS ) >» »»D»dD >» yD “>>> vy — Hp). 35 Se aw Dy yp») )) De . WY. ons > ) >. ) » > > ne? Rot reudre 00 * neemee Cd Ne pee oat Pear or easy Staverecpiaie a velte faust nee * ri ' Siteperateetdiisd) tial bistetea dalsane slabs ty! a wee ” f ‘ eletit bebtteeye ey dal ; i 4 mena Le hs pat eteng th * On) ae } : ' these ' if tivoresppree ji : etc tith ey ieee ie mur an i iy dye myin arp bya ynt erste! yrs) HORST OSD ibis wit Fyre . ¥ soomehesteuare cs pve Mw MIA IA PIM eehemisieitidimss ated, | ; ee Ladacetadet ab ab laceiseeeareaibabeteeeal itwghite o> ehampadeneimtans 2emered itet bt eb eenbepe rey ih t eerie Tetet a taidh deled tied , ee Dit Uae ee ee Maui ; Wie { (ied i it we? 4 t i AP h Tete DY Vide sis yeteamttnced ts Hina ; ya . ; EP AAAMIALE RE Pattee Msaatie by Aly , i 4 et hantiese Welt ik ‘ ‘ rte oat ae sty odin 7 Brrrice i ; ‘ Mat ret! wh ow wet L , J i 4 { i ibsepveatonae sist te t y : { {dite i watreagrmih pie fi ; KY, f Wee won tuam cadets sates at} } tetakat ssae sae ren } y f Teh beep f 1] ‘ beats oT HY i asi terse ieseneaaenty ; { Aergre depen ee jhe ‘ (gpeeletorneines ot so cele bes uretibaain biggie ie ee atmah eine ity TTaeAS\CSb peed: Py i) Mat aieten thse) yan Ut NCL PUN Bps aanrat ha Bert iat AY uit ae Pe rleniyaig eee Ae) “ret See Tish MuAh, Spree TU aes RP aaye Tes irg tira es’ ahr FR Pas piv bade at, Pate rytors mye, fF Beaten beay ty Paeeeuist tats Ain. a ete Wal veut BH, Dee rareg POKMN erkeced te: utweebe VAM etal van gh el Teak TRE Tat Pe Whe ook Fasury yheesvne FoR 6 Paver yy Me wiSeathalitshe ee eat Merit ers aE Atl ear FanyTeees iopulabylnctene tats etait an retin tarelaterce Rutt Saas My elt perk naira Sateeet ata) SI iat eee ete pea cesniat nh ANAL ht et sFhrenty Mery Nida ” Vey e ty Beh tne rts AeawaaaereiT ace tr a TENN ETERS OMP Drs, Fue my) Ltr avee: selynyens WAAL AR LEG Seiassrtatesreern heheh Hifi we SRS asaieW iH Y Se Mare neuonas eo tEelt AIA PT ee Pia usa titel casa att eysesosys ‘ FENN AEA Hoinsathial seiko” finer et y Oh dy SAU MEH beReaadati ag Bonerearnrwidnctet i ounyic tts y er er avira arr Nee hi Teun tt