PHYTOLOGIA _An international journal to expedite botanical and phytoecological publication Vol. 66 | May 1989 No. 3 CONTENTS /REVEAL, J.L., Notes on selected genera related to Chorizanthe { (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae) 0000000000000 0000080S0OSSOSSOOSOSOOOESOSOOOEOOO0E9 199 J REVEAL, J.L., A review of the genus Harfordia (Polygonaceae: E riogonoideae) SOOOCOOOOO STOO OOOO OOO OOS OOOOSOS ODES OOS OOOOH OOO SOS OSOOESOOSOSOSESOESSOOES 2?1 , REVEAL, J.L., Remarks on the genus Pterostegia (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae) OOOO OOOOOOOOOE SOOO OOOO OOSSOSOOOSEOO OOO OOOOOOSSOOOOSOSOSOOOOOOOSOOSOOOOS 228 “REVEAL, J.L., Notes on selected genera related to Eriogonum j (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae) OOCOCOOSSOOOOO OOOO SSOOOOOOOTOOSOSSOOSOOOOOCOSOOSOS 236 REVEAL, J.L., A new variety ‘of Eriogonum nudum (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae) from the southern Sierra Nevada escsceccccccecssceseseves 246 BEVEAL,. Jul: and: J/R; SHEVOCK, A new variety of Eriogonum _ _prattenianum (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae) from the southern Sierra N evad a SOSSHOSSSSOSSSOSSHSSOSSSSSSSSSSSOSSSHSSSHHSSSSHOSSSHSSSSSSSSSOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOSEOESOSS 249 q REVEAL, J.L., New combinations and novelties in Eriogonum (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae) COCCCCOO OOOO SOOOOOOOO OOO OOS SOSOOOEOOOOOESOOSOOESES 251 / REVEAL, J.L., A checklist of the Eriogonoideae (Polygonaceae) seseeer+ 266 Published by Michael J. Warnock 185 Westridge Drive Huntsville, Texas 77340 U.S.A. Price of this number $3.00; for this volume $16.00 in advance or $17.00 after close of this volume; $5.00 extra to all foreign addresses; 512 pages constitute a complete volume; claims for numbers lost in the mail must be made immediately after receipt of the next following number for free replacement; back volume prices apply if payment is received after a volume is closed. C U0 ze JUN 26 1989 ue Phytologia (May 1989) 66(3):199-220 NOTES ON SELECTED GENERA RELATED TO CHORIZANTHE (POLYGONACEAE: ERIOGONOIDEAE) JAMES L. REVEAL Department of Botany, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-5815 ABSTRACT In a revision of Chorizanthe prepared by Reveal and Hardham (1989b) several species were excluded. Three species were referred to new genera, Aristocapsa, Dodecahema and Systenotheca, all removed from the previously excluded genus Censrostegia which itself is now considered to be monospecific. The genus Mucronea with it two species and Lastarriaea with its three, along with the monospecific genus Hollisteria, have been maintained as distinct from Chorizanthe. Four of these excluded genera, Muconea, Censrostegia, Hollisteria and Lastarriaea are reviewed with the genera and its species characterized and representative specimens listed documenting their known distribution. Lastarriaea ptilota, endemic to the Desierto el Vizcaino and the Cedros Island region of Baja California, México, is described as new. All of these genera are placed in the subtribe Hollisteriineae, which is defined to include those genera of the Eriogoneae having One to six flowers in an awned narrowly tubular involucre or subtended by bractlike involucral lobes. KEY WORDS: Polygonaceae, taxonomy, Mucronea, Centrostegia, Hollisteria, Lastarriaea, Cali- fornia, México, Chile. INTRODUCTION In a recent review of the annual species of Chorizanthe (Reveal & Hardham 1989b), several species were excluded and referred to other genera. Three species generally included in Chorizanthe or Centrostegia were each placed in a monospecific genus: Aristocapsa, Dodecahema and Systenotheca (Reveal & Hardham 1989a). Four other species were removed from Chorizanthe as defined by some authors (Torrey & Gray 1870; Watson 1877; Jepson 1913, 1925; Abrams 1944; Munz 1959, 1974). These include Chorizanthe californica and C. perfoliata which we, like Goodman (1934) the last monographer of Chorizanthe, prefer to keep in Mucronea as defined by Bentham (1836, 1856) and followed by Hoover (1966). In addition, two other species often placed in Chorizanthe (Parry 1884, 1885; Goodman 1934; Munz 1959, 1974), C. coriacea of North America and the superfluous C. lastarriaea of South America, are returned to Lastarriaea, a genus that has long been considered to be distinct (Rémy 1851-1852; Torrey & Gray 1870; Watson 1877; Parry 1886; Jepson 1913, 1925; Abrams 1944; Hoover 1966; Wiggins 1980). Significantly, a new species is added to Lastarnaea, a central Baja California endemic currently known only from two collections. Two additional monospecific genera are also recognized, Hollisteria and Centrostegia. With the removal of three species previously placed in Centrostegia as noted above, Centrostegia now becomes monospecific but unlike the other segregates in North America whose species are essentially restricted to California and Baja California, Centrostegia thurberi is distributed over a wide 199 200 PHYTOLOGIA volume 66(3):199-220 May 1989 area of the American Southwest. The genus Hollisteria has uniformly been regarded as dis- tinct from Chorizanthe or Eriogonum except indirectly by Jones (1908) who proposed a new species of Chorizanthe that proved to be based on specimens of H. lanata., and by Roberty and Vautier (1964) who, in their bizarre review of the Polygonaceae, transferred H. lanata to Eriogonum. Shields and Reveal (1988) excluded Hollisteria from the Chorizanthe complex retaining it with Eriogonum where it had been traditionally placed (Curran 1885; Dammer 1892; Gross 1913a). That view is now rejected and Hollisteria is placed in the Chonzanthe complex in an isolated position. The purpose of this paper is to present a series of descriptions and discussions of the four already established genera that are related to but distinct from Chorizanthe. TAXONOMY The subf. Eriogonoideae was established by Meisner (1856) in the introduction to the Polygonaceae published in de Candolle’s Prodromus. The name was used by numerous au- thors up to Melchior (1964) although, for some unknown reason, the taxon was reproposed by Roberty and Vautier (1964). In all instances, the taxon was circumscribed to include those genera of Polygonaceae that lacked a well defined ochrea. Dumort (1829) proposed the tribe Eriogoneae, placing it in the Chenopodiaceae; Bentham (1836) would later transfer the taxon to the Polygonaceae where it has remained essentially unchanged. Walpers (1852) elevated the group to the family rank, but the name has rarely been used. Torrey and Gray (1870) renamed the tribe Eueriogoneae. According to the /nternational Code of Botanical Nomencla- ture (Greuter 1988), this last name is not only superfluous but such names are not permitted (Art. 21.3). Within the subfamily, Torrey and Gray (1870) distinguished two tribes, Eriogoneae and Pterostegieae, and both are still recognized. The latter is restricted to Pterostegia and Har- fordia (Reveal 1989a, b). Dammer (1892) had included these two genera, along with Lastar- niaea, Nemacaulis and Hollisteria, in the subtribe Koenigiinae. Its type (Art. 22.4; Greuter 1988) is the genus Koenigia L., a taxon that is not now regarded to be a member of the subfamily (Roberty & Vautier 1964; Melchior 1964). In his review of the Polygonaceae, Gross (1913a) recognized the subf. Eriogonoideae and divided it into two tribes, the Eriogoneae and the Hollisterieae. The latter was itself divided into two subtribes, Hollisteriinae and Harfordiinae. The latter consisted of Pterostegia and Harfordia, while the former included not only Hollisteria but Gilmania (as Phyllogonum) and Nemacaulis along with Lastarriaea. Gross defined the Eriogoneae to include Enogonum, Pterogonum (a new genus he proposed), Oxytheca, Centrostegia and Chorizanthe. Reveal and Howell (1976) recognized 13 genera in Eriogonoideae. With the publication of Goodmania (Reveal & Ertter 1977) the number increased to 14. In Shields and Reveal (1988), the general phylogenetic scheme called for both Hollisteria and Nemacaulis to be associated with Eriogonum, with the placement of Hollisteria the most problematic. Now it is proposed that Hollisteria be placed in the Chorizanthe complex. As here defined, the tribe Eriogoneae is divided into two subtribes, Eriogonineae (Roberty & Vautier 1964) and the Hollisteriineae (Gross 1913a). The two taxa differ mainly in the number of flowers per involucre (mostly numerous in Eriogonineae versus 1-6 in the Hol- listeriineae) but the two may also be differentiated by the general shape and construction of their involucres and by the presence or absence of uncinate or short involucral awns. A review of genera belonging to the Eriogonineae is presented elsewhere (Reveal 1989c). Reveal: Genera related to Chorizanthe (Polygonaceae) 201 Polygonaceae Juss. subtribe Hollisteriineae H. Gross, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 49: 329. 1913. Polygonaceae tribe Hollisterieae H. Gross, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 49: 239. 1913.— TYPE: Hol- listeria §. Wats. according to Art. 22.4 of the ICBN. Polygonaceae chort Chorizanthastreae Roberty & Vautier, Boissiera 10: 84. 1964.— TYPE: Chorizanthe R. Br. ex Benth. according to Art. 22.4 of the ICBN. Plants annual or perennial herbs to subshrubs; /eaves basal or cauline, mostly narrow, thinly to densely pubescent; inflorescences mostly cymose with the secondary branches typi- cally suppressed; peduncles typically lacking or short and rather stout; involucres narrow and cylindrical or if broader then the tube cylindric and the teeth broad, divergent and thickish, the teeth typically armed with short, straight or more often uncinate awns, occasionally the involucre reduced to a series of awned involucral bracts; flowers 1-6 per involucre, usually short pedicellate, the tepals mostly narrow and thinly pubescent at least along the midrib; achenes narrow or globose with a straight or curved embryo; n= mostly 14, 17 or 19-24, 40. Widespread in western North America from eastern Washington and Idaho south through California, Nevada and southern Utah to Arizona and northwestern México, and in southwestern South America in the arid regions of extreme southern Perd south to central Chile, with the greatest concentration in coastal and arid regions of California and northern Baja California. The use of the name Hollisteriineae for the subtribe rather than one based on (and therefore typified by) Chorizanthe is unfortunate especially given the controversal positioning of Hol- listeria within the Chorizanthe complex. Gross (1913a) initially failed to describe the subtribe (p. 239), but in his concluding remarks (p. 329) he provided a key to the higher taxa in Polygonaceae and there effectively published the name. As here defined, the subtribe Hollisteriineae is composed of eight genera, the largest being Chorizanthe with some 50 species of annuals and perennials. This genus is the most widely distributed of the taxon being found throughout the range of the subtribe in North and South America (Reveal & Hardham 1989b). The majority of genera are endemic to California: Aristocapsa, Dodecahema, Systenotheca, Mucronea and Hollisteria. Centrostegia is found in southwestern North America from California east to southern Utah south into north- western México. The genus Lastarriaea is encountered along the coast and in the more arid inland regions of central and southern California southward to central Baja California, México, and then like Chorizanthe, it reappears again in the deserts of northern and central Chile. Except for Mucronea and Lastarriaea, all of these smaller genera are monospecific. The vast majority of the species assigned to the subtribe are annuals; the ten or so Chilean perennial species of Chorizanthe being the only exception. The flowers are generally solitary in the involucre or at a node, but some may have two or three, with only one genus, Ars- tocapsa, having six flowers in the involucre. Flowers are in well defined involucres in all genera except Hollisteria and Lastarriaea. In these genera the involucre is reduced to a whorl of awned involucral bracts subtending the flower. The general shape of the involucre is long and slender with a generally cylindric shape. The involucral teeth are mostly short with short, straight or uncinate awns, but in several species the teeth are longer and stout with the divergent teeth thickened basally so that the teeth are often more pronounced than the tube. In such instances not all of the teeth may be awned for the smaller alternating three may be obscure and awnless. In a few instances, the number of lobes is truely three and in Mucronea californica it can be reduced to two. The majority of the involucral tubes are distinctly angled with six teeth. Major exceptions are the involucres of Arstocapsa insigne 202 PHYTOL OGIA volume 66(3):199-220 May 1989 and Chonzanthe spinosa where five involucral teeth and a smooth surface more typical of those scen in the Eriogonineae are encountered. The flowers of Lastarriaea are coriaceous with each tepal bearing a small, terminal, un- cinate awn similar to that found on involucres elsewhere in the subtribe. It and Hollisteria are the most advanced genera of the subtribe, but neither is all that closely related to the other. In Centrostegia, the five involucral lobes are fused so as to create a highly modified, 3-angled, prismatic tube. Key to the Genera A. Involucres distinctly tubular and well defined at least basally. B. Bracts opposite or whorled, not 3-lobed or parted; flowers 1 (2) in the involucre; plants annual or perennial; widespread in western North America and southwestern South America. ...... 1. Chorizanthe BB. Bracts alternate, 3-lobed or parted; flowers (1) 2-6 in the involucre; strictly annual. C. Involucres 24- or 6-lobed or -toothed; flowers 1-2 per involucre. D. _Involucres not awned basally, California. E. Flowers pubescent, perfect; bracts conspicuous; involucral teeth unequal; Coast Ranges of central and southern California eastward onto the western edge of the Mojave Desert. Beas cidetevonecbonespsaupsuatiaaeededswadens seins stuatievahtuvuceessateiecedecscshsbsuaastesett eee REE 2. Mucronea EE. Flowers glabrous but densely papillate, polygamo-dioecious with the upper one perfect and the lower one female; bracts small; involucral teeth equal; Santa Lucia Mountains of Monterey and San Luis Obispo COS. .......-.-.csecsecsecsessesessesnsssssesnsensesnenneeeee 3. Systenotheca DD. Involucres awned basally, southwestern North America. E. Basal awns 3, curved on saccate basal lobes; terminal awns 5, straight; involucres strongly prismatic and 3-angled; flowers 2; California east to Utah and south to northwestern MEXICO (i hasteacaossscptescsssesacedusdapvatossonscdectcsestravic tues cocecezelesncane ivoutetee redeem 4. Centrostegia EE. Basal awns 6, uncinate on smooth basal lobes; terminal awns 6, uncinate; involucres strongly 6-angled; flowers 3; southwestern California. ...........:cceseeeceeeee 5. Dodecahema CC. Involucres 5-toothed; flowers 4-6 per involucre, pubescent; Coast Ranges of Monterey and San Luis OTE ESS. ccrcereecosreecr er cor ere oreroercer oreo rrcee thor rorec oo rine barre occ ccbeerherecostrcersnthonnctern coer 6. Aristocapsa AA. Involucres reduced to a series of 3 (4) involucral bracts. B. Flowers bright yellow and densely tomentose with mucronate petaloid tepals; stamens 6-9; branches tomentose; central! California... <.: 22:22. ssscacss2easc-cecscessenenscecessnsussaasicsasisuessneveseudcoeoouea str ttere eee EEE 7. Hollisteria BB. Flowers light green to greenish-white, thinly pubescent with distinctly coriaceous awned tepals; stamens 3; branches glabrous or sparsely pubescent; widespread in central and southern California south to central Baja California; disjunct*to: Chiles. occ svvccssc-cscececcersscenecstasesseccossascoeccsnds