ee, AND BLACKWELL. | Vee = cody, coy ra J ~ * Ph 3 New Zealand Fruits. Freycinetia Banksii Coprosma, 3 sp. Astelia Cunninghamii. Dysoxylum spectabile. ants of New Zealand BY Re, ee ING:, - Base. f.- We BLACK W HEE, With 160 original Photographs by E. W. and F. B. Blackwell. Notothlaspi rosulatum (4 nat. size). LIBRARY -W VYVORK = VY VINE CHRISTCHURCH, WELLINGTON, AND DUNEDIN, N.Z.; MELBOURNE AND LONDON: WHITCOMBE AND TOMBS LIMITED. 1906 “ Harth’s crammed with Heav’n, And every common bush afire with God ; But only he who sees takes off his shoes.”’ —E. B. BROWNING. JUN 3=- 1907 LIBRARY NEW YORK BOTANICAL iIARDEN. PREFACE. The Flora of New Zealand is one of the most remarkable known. Indeed, it is so highly specialized, that these islands are generally considered to constitute a distinct Botanical Region. Drude divides the earth into fourteen such Regions, and New Zealand is the twelfth on his list.“ This little colony is therefore botanically equal in importance to districts of much vaster area. In spite, however, of the fact that our Flora is one of the most interesting on the face of the earth, there are very few who have any real acquaintanceship with it. This ignorance is doubtless due to the inaccessibility and technicality of the literature dealing with the subject. In this work an endeavour has been made to give an account of our native plants that will be intelligible to all. As few technical terms as possible have been employed herein, and those used have been explained either in the text or glossary. An attempt has also been made to give as many interesting particulars of the species as the limits of our space will allow. It is hoped, therefore, that the volume will be of service to all who wish to know something more of a vegetation that is unique. To New Zealand teachers, but especially to those interested in nature study, it should be of considerable value; as well as to all colonists who have any love for the wild flowers of their neighbour- hood. ‘Tourists, also, will find here the means for readily identifying all the more conspicuous plants that they are likely to meet with, whilst en route through the colony. Though no new species are described here, many fresh facts have been embodied in the text, and a great quantity of botanical information has been culled from many sources for the book. Hitherto the student has only been able to obtain much of this material by wide and laborious reading in English and German publications and journals. Hence the book will—we trust—be of some value to the botanist who wishes to procure, in small compass, a suggestive guide for further research. * Handbuch der Pflanzengeographie. vl PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND The work is not a Flora, and therefore does not include all known species. It deals only with flowering plants, and, amongst these, omits the grasses, and certain less important orders. The grasses have been dealt with in special publications by Mr. Buchanan. The other orders omitted are represented by species little likely to attract the attention of any but the trained botanist. All the more important and conspicuous flowering plants, and many of the rarer ones, have been here described, except in the larger genera, such as Coprosma, Veronica, Ranunculus, Olearia, and Senecio, where we have been reluctantly compelled to content ourselves with a selection of the chief types. Such a book as this must be to a considerable extent a compila- tion; and we have therefore made free use of the labours of our predecessors in the field. Amongst these, especial mention may be made of Sir J. Hooker, Dr. Cockayne, Dr. Diels, and Messrs. T. Kirk, T. F. Cheeseman, G. M. Thomson, and D. Petrie. Indeed, all botanical papers in the Transactions of the New Zealand Institute” have been carefully consulted, and all literature obtainable, bearmg on the subject, has been read. Unfortunately, the profound paper of Dr. Diels on the New Zealand Flora still remains untranslated, and so is unaccessible to most students. We have therefore made free use of it. We have to thank Dr. L. Cockayne for helping us over many slippery places, and for much generous assistance freely given. We are indebted to Mr. T. F. Cheeseman for the identification of many dried specimens, and for other kindnesses. Assistance has been received from Miss Irene Wilson in the preparation of the glossary, and from Mr. J. Christie in the proof reading. We are also under obligations to the following gentlemen for the gift of photographs for reproduction as illustrations: Mr. J. Deans, Mr. A. C. Gifford, Mr. A. Hamilton, Mr. H. Larkin, Mr. S. Page, Mr. J. Crosby-Smith, and Mr. R. Speight. It should be mentioned that for the first time an endeavour has been made to bring the classification of the New Zealand flowering plants into accord with modern ideas. We have therefore arranged the families according to Engler’s system, and not in accordance with that of Hooker and Bentham, hitherto in vogue. (Unfortunately we have been unable to find room for a synopsis of the families, but this may be obtained in any good modern text-book of botany.) *These are shortly referred to in the foot notes, as Trans. PREFACE Vil The book accordingly starts with the pines,—the lowest group of plants described,—and ends with the Composites, the most highly specialized family in the Vegetable Kingdom. This arrangement is much more in harmony with evolutionary ideas than that usually adopted. It is hoped that the book will be found up to date, and, though its authors are conscious of its many short-comings, they trust it will be of service to all who wish to learn something of the fascinating problems in the Plant World around them. R.M.L. EK.W.B. March 30th, 1906. TAB OF SCONTEN TES: INTRODUCTION. GENERAL INTRODUCTION, p. 1. The open country, p. 3. The fern land, p. 6. The bush, p. 8. The natural permanence of the bush, p.10. The destruction of the forest, p.12. ‘The Passing of the Forest,” p.13. Types of forest, p.15. Lianes, p. 16. Epiphytes, p- 20. The scrub, p. 21. Alpine vegetation, p. 22. THE AGE AND AFFINITIES OF THE FLORA, p. 24. Oceanic and Continental islands, p. 26. The age of the Flora, p. 27. The affinities of the Flora, p. 30. The Australian element, p. 32. The Melanesian element, p. 35. South American element, p. 36. Sub-Antarctic element, p. 36. BOTANICAL INTRODUCTION, p. 38. Plant Life, p. 38. Root and stem, p. 39. The leaf, p. 39. The flower, p. 43. The dispersal of seeds, p. 45, Classification, p. 46. Key to the New Zealand families of flowering plants, p. 49. THE GYMNOSPERMS. THE PINE FAMILY, p. 58. The Kauri, p. 60. The Kawaka, p. 66. The Miro, p. 68. The Totara, p. 69. The Black Pine, p. 69. The White Pine, p. 70. The Red Pine, p. 74. The Celery-leaved Pine, p. 76. THE ANGIOSPERMS. THE MONOCOTYLEDONS, p. 80. The Screw-pine Family, p. 80. The Palm Family, p. 80. The Lily Family, p. 88. The Iris Family, p. 109. The Orchid Family, p. 109. THE DICOTYLEDONS WITH FREE PETALS, p. 127. The Pepper Family, p. 127. The Beech Family, p. 128. The Nettle Family, p. 136. The Mistletoe Family, p. 138. The Bottle-Brush Family, p. 145. The Sandal-wood Family, p. 148. A Family of Root Parasites, p. 149. The Buckwheat Family, p. 151. The Beet Family, p. 154. The Pink Family, p. 156. The Marvel of Peru Family, p. 159. The Mesembryanthemum Family, p. 159. The Buttercup Family, p. 160. The Magnolia Family, p. 172. The Pukatea, p. 174. The Laurel Family, p. 175. The Wallflower Family, p.177. The Sundew Family, p. 180. The Currant-Tree Family, p. 185. The “ Matipo’’ Family, p. 189. The Rose Family, p. 195. The Pea Family, p. 203. The Geranium Family, p. 215. The Flax Family, p. 218. The Rue Family, p. 218. The Mahogany Tree Family, p. 222. The Spurge Family, p. 224. The Maple Family, p. 224. The Tutu Family, p. 226. Pennantia, p. 230. The Karaka, p. 233. The Buckthorn Family, p. 235, The Lime-tree Family, p. 242. The Mallow Family, p. 250. The Violet Family, p. 261. The Passion-flower Family, p. 268. The Daphne Family, p. 269. The Myrtle Family, p. 270. The Fuchsia Family, p. 290. The Haloragis Family, p. 295. The Dogwood Family, p. 297. The Ivy Family, p. 300. The Parsley Family, p. 313. THE DICOTYLEDONS WITH UNITED PETALS, p.323. The Heath Family, p. 323. The Myrsine Family, p. 331. The Primrose Family, p. 333. The Olive Family, p. 334. The Nux- Vomica Family, p. 334. The Gentian Family, p. (336. The Periwinkle Family, p. 340. The Bindweed Family, p. 342. The Borage Family, p. 346. The Verbena Family, p. 349. The Thyme Family, p. 364. The Nightshade Family, p. 365. The Snap-dragon Family, p. 367. The Gloxinia Family, p. 366. The Butterwort Family, p. 388. The Madder Family, p. 389. The Honeysuckle Family, p. 399. The Cucumber Family, p. 399. The Canterbury Bell Family, p. 401. The Goodenia Family, p. 404. The Daisy Family, p. 405. EkSa Aciphylla Colensoi =3 Monroi Agathis australis (bush) ” ? (cones) 0 a (tree) Aristotelia racemosa Arthropodium cirrhatum Astelia Banksii », Cunninghamii », nervosa Avicennia officinalis (aerial roots) Avicennia officinalis (flower) (roots) (seed) ” ”” ” ”? Beech Forest (Photo by A. C. Gifford) Beilschmiedia Tarairi Brachyglottis repanda Cabbage-tree bush Carex secta (Photo by J. Deans) Carmichaelia australis (flower) ef 7 (seed) Carpodetus serratus Cassinia Vauvilliersi Celmisia coriacea ” ”? ,, longifolia Clematis indivisa (staminate form) Clematis indivisa (pistillate form) Clematis indivisa (seed) Clematis parviflora Clianthus puniceus Coprosma arborea He lucida ae tenuicaulis Cordyline australis (bush) OF 62 61 D5 152 144 145 ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE 318 320 61 | | | FIG. PAGE Cordyline australis (flower) 23 95 Coriaria ruscifolia 69 9-227 Corynocarpus levigata 70 231 0 46 (trees) 71 234 (Photo by S. Page) Corysanthes macrantha 35 126 Craspedia uniflora 153.434 Cupressoid Types 124 374 (Photo by H. Larkin) Dacrydium cupressinum 12 Ui Dactylanthus Taylori 42 150 Dendrobium Cunninghamii 34 = 128 (Photo by A. C. Gifford) Discaria toumatou 73 240 (Photo by Dr. L. Cockayne) Dracophyllum uniflorum 108 = 330 Drosera auriculata Spy alisha », Spathulata 53-183 (Photo by J. Crosby Smith) Dysoxylum spectabile 68 223 Earina suaveolens il eelaley » » Ba) L2it Eleocarpus dentatus 76 247 5 Hookerianus i e2e9 Entelea arborescens 74 243 Epacris pauciflora 107 328 Flax, New Zealand 28 105 Freycinetia Banksii (flower) 13 79 a - (fruit) 14 81 Fruits, Group of Frontispiece Fuchsia excorticata 94 291 Gaya Lyall 81 259 Gaultheria rupestris 106-326 Geniostoma ligustrifolium tt 336 Gentiana corymbifera 112 339 Gnaphalium trinerve 147 425 Griselinia littoralis 95 299 (Photo by J. Crosby Smith) Hedycarya arborea 50 173 Helichrysum bellidioides 151 429 ne erandiceps 150 428 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Helichrysum species (Photo by H. Larkin) Herpolirion novae-Zelandiae (Photo by J. Crosby Smith) Hoheria populnea (var. angustifolia) 9 ” Ixerba brexioides Kahikatea berries Karaka grove (Photo by S. Page) Kauri bush », cones 3) uree Knightia excelsa Kowhai (yellow) a (red) Leptospermum ericoides +6 scoparium (bush) ” 9 (flower) Leucopogon fasciculatus Lianes (Photo by S. Page) Ligusticum piliferum Luzuriaga marginata (Photo by J. Crosby Smith) Macropiper excelsum Mangrove (flower) 2 (aerial roots) 5 (stilt roots) An (seed) Melicope simplex PP * (nat. size) Melicytus ramiflorus Meryta Sinclairii Metrosideros hypericifolia ne robusta (flower) 7 », (tree) _ scandens a tomentosa Microtis porrifolia Miro berries Mihlenbeckia axillaris ne complexa Myoporum letum (flower) +e) 99 (tree) (Photo by S. Page) 44 43 120 119 PAGE 374 Myrtus bullata 108 | | Ngaio Tree 129 353, Nertera dichondrefolia New Zealand Flax (Photo by S. Page) Nigger-heads (Photo by J. Deans) Nikau (bud in sheath) ,, (flower) a ,, (nat. size) ,, (Grove of) ,, (abnormally branched) Nothofagus (trees) (Photo by A. C. Gifford) Ve Menziesii (flower) Nothopanax Colensoi | Notothlaspi rosulatum 355 | 357 359 219 291 265 310 279 283 278 287 285 113 67 154 153 363 362 (Photo by R. Speight). Olea Cunninghamii | Olearia Forsteri (Photo by H. Larkin) furfuracea ilicifolia (Photo by J. Crosby Smith) insignis _ (Photo by A. Hamilton) - nummularifola a virgata Orchids (group) Ourisia macrophylla (Photo by A. Hamilton) Paratrophis microphyllus _ Parsonsia capsularis _ Passiflora tetrandra Phormium tenax Pimelea virgata Pittosporum cornifoliam (flower) ded be) Ae tenuifolium Plagianthus divaricatus Pleurophyllum speciosum (Photo by A. Hamilton) Podocarpus dacrydioides ferruginea totara oe) 99 | Pomaderris phylicefolia Pseudopanax crassifolium (flower) (seed) x1 FIG. PAGE 93 289 135 397 298 105 119 362 2 5 16 85 I7/ 86 18 87 15 83 19 89 a7) alsa 38 135 97 303 Title Page 110 =. 3334 142 415 138 409 139 «410 137 407 140 411 141 413 30. =: 113 130 396385 39137 113 341 83 267 28 105 84 271 57 =6192 58 193 DOmLoN 80 255 143 «417 10 73 8 67 9 71 72 237 99 308 Xl FIG. Pseudopanax crassifolium 98 (tree) (Photo by H. Larkin). Pterostylis Banksii 32 Ranunculus Lyallii 49 Raoula australis 148 (Photo by H. Larkin) . mamuillaris 149 (Photo by H. Larkin) Rhabdothamnus Solandri 131 Rhipogonum scandens 20 Rhopalostylis sapida (grove of) 15 Rhopalostylis sapida 19 (abnormally branched specimen) Rhopalostylis sapida (bud in sheath) 16 Rhopalostylis sapida (inflorescence of) 17 Rhopalostylis sapida (flower, nat. size) 18 Rimu (spray of) 12 Rubus australis 60 ,, schmidelioides 59 Schefflera digitata 101 Selliera radicans 136 Senecio cassinioides 155 Lyall 156 ” PLANTS OF NEW PAGE 306 119 169 426 427 387 ZEALAND Senecio saxifragoides Solanum ayiculare Sophora tetraptera (flower) 2 ” (seed) Stilbocarpa polaris (Photo by A. Hamilton) Stypheha acerosa Supple-jack Tawhera Thelymitra longifolia Totara (Photo by S. Page) Tree-ferns Tupeia antarctica Tussock Country (Photo by J. Deans) Veronica cataractae f lycopodioides 5 monticola a salicifolia . speciosa Traversii 9) Veronicas (whip-cord) (Photo by H. Larkin) Vitex lucens Whip-cord Veronicas (Photo by H. Larkin) White Pine (Photo by S. Page) FIG, 157 121 64 PAGE 439 365 211 213 301 332 91 81 113 (al 7 143 4 ants of New Zealand. GENERAL INTRODUCTION. ““Oh, when I am safe in my sylvan home, I tread on the pride of Greece and Rome, And when I am stretched beneath the pines, Where the evening star so holy shines, I laugh at the lore and the pride of Man, At the sophist schools and learned clan. For what are they all, in their high conceit, When Man in the bush with God may meet ? ”’ R. W. EMERSON. NiEw ZEALAND is almost in the centre of the greatest water- surface of the globe. It is indeed the Land’s End of the world; and as such affords to the geologist, biologist, and ethnologist, material of the highest interest. But not to the scientist alone is it full of fascination. Any lover of Nature will find here an inexhaustible store-house for his wonder and admiration. Life everywhere is infinite in its variety and unfailing in its resourcefulness. In New Zealand it has developed many plants and animals unknown in any other part of the world. Indeed, two-thirds of the indigenous species of flowering plants are not to be met with elsewhere. This is a much higher percentage of local forms than can be found in any other islands of approximately the same extent. This unparalleled proportion of endemic species is due, partly, perhaps, to the long isolation of the islands, partly to the great 2. a 2 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND variety of conditions they offer, and partly, no doubt, to the nature of the floras from which their own has been derived ; but also to unknown factors that have not, as yet, come within the ken of the investigator. Not only does the flora contain a unique assemblage of local species, 1t also shows an unusually varied assortment of plant families and associations. Nor is this to be wondered at, if we consider the changes of climatic, geographical, and geological conditions to be met with every few miles. We would certainly expect to find many very different kinds of vegetation between the warm sub-tropical ravines of the voleanic Kermadecs, and the wind-swept heights of the sub- Antarctic Auckland Islands; and we are not disappointed in our search. Hooker, and other early botanists, declared that the plant covering was constant over wide areas; but this generalisation was largely due to an imperfect acquaintance with the distribution of the species, and with the rarer forms of the flora. It has not been borne out by the work of more recent investigators. Many New Zealand plants are very restricted in their distribution. The altitudinal changes of climate are as well marked as those of latitude. There is often not more than twenty or thirty miles distance between the lne of sea-level and that of perpetual snow. Thus, within a comparatively small area, all types of plants may be found, from those of the sea-shore, to those of alpine heights. Great variations in rainfall are also to be met with in places not far apart. This, of course, is largely due to the presence of high mountain chains, such as the Southern Alps, the Kaikouras, and Ruahines. The smallest average rainfall yet recorded is that of Clyde, with 15 inches, and the highest, 228 inches, at Puysegur Poimt. The former place is in Central, the latter in South-Western Otago; and the distance between them is only 150 miles. Indeed, there are few districts of equal extent that can show so many changes of climate, elevation, and surface in such a small GENERAL INTRODUCTION 3 space as New Zealand. It might be expected, therefore, that not many plants would cover large areas of the country to the exclusion of other species; and this is the case. Except for the beeches, the manuka, the tussock-grass, and the bracken fern, few species monopolise any large tract of country. The constant changes of surface, altitude, and climate must of necessity be reflected in the plant-covering of the land. Even the most careless observer 1s struck by the great differences in the floras of the eastern and western sides of the dividing range—differences corresponding in a large measure, to increase or decrease of average rainfall. In some places, within a distance of a mile or two, the beech forest of the drier regions changes into the mixed bush of the moister western area. New Zealand, therefore, presents a field of unsurpassed interest to the botanist. Here he may find plants grouped together into as many different associations as on a continent. All classes of habitat, from the littoral to the alpine ; from the arid plain to the lake, from the rock to the peat-bog, from moorland to salt meadow, are well represented. Plants are to be met with in an almost endless variety of situations. We shall, however, at present consider only the plants of the open plains, the forest (or, as it is locally termed, the ‘‘ bush ’’), the scrub, and the mountains. THE OPEN COUNTRY. ‘“*T see again the upland wilds, Stern, rugged, bleak, and bare ; The strong winds sweep o’er the hill sides steep And the tussocks toss in the icy air Silver and gold in the changing light, Gold and silver far up on the heights Of the mountain wild and bare.’’ DAVID MCKEE WRIGHT. Throughout New Zealand, from Southland to the North Cape, there are numerous open plains of greater or lesser extent. In England such spaces would be meadow lands, carpeted with 4 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND a grassy sward, which would in spring and summer be spangled with flowers. In New Zealand, they are covered with a vegetation of a very different type. As far north as Lake Taupo, it consists chiefly of tussock grass, toi-toi, and cabbage tree (palm-lily). This plant formation is most highly developed in Canterbury, where wide open tussock-clad plains cover an area of two and a half million acres. The Englishman, on his arrival here, is puzzled by the appearance of detached hillocks of grass, in place of the continuous turf of the green fields to which he is accustomed. He cannot understand that this dry Fig. 1—Tussock Country. hard wiry straw can replace, to a large extent, the pasture lands of England. This plant association not only covers much of the flat country, but is found in many places throughout the South Island upon the hills, especially on the eastern slopes of the ranges. The chief species of grasses found in it are Poa caespitosa and Festuca duriuscula, but some Danthonias are also to be met with in such situations. The tussock country 1s dearly loved by every New Zealander. It is full of associations for him. The stock-rider, the shepherd, the swagger, and even the sun-downer know every aspect of GENERAL INTRODUCTION 5 it. They have seen it in early morning, when every tawny thread had its string of clammy mist drops. They have seen it again at midday, a parched and thirsty land, that seemed to be covered with broken yellow wavelets, flying before the fierce squalls of the nor’-wester. They have stumbled through the entangled tufts at night, too tired to lift their feet. They have slept amongst them, tying together adjacent bunches to form a tunnel in which they might be sheltered from the cutting night winds of the plain. In many places, particularly near water courses or shingly river beds, the toi-toi (Arundo conspicua) largely replaces the tussock. It is the tallest and most conspicuous grass in the New Zealand Flora. It bears a considerable resemblance to Fig. 2—Nigger-heads. the magnificent Pampas Grass of the Argentine, now cultivated all over the world. It is not, however, so large or so beautiful as the American grass ; 1t flowers at a different season, and may readily be distinguished by the more graceful droop of the flowerstalk. The plumes of the pampas grass are taller, straighter, and stiffer than those of the toi-toi. The edges of streams on the tussock-clad plains are often fringed with flax and bulrush, whilst, in the water itself, stand numbers of blackened stumps about two feet high, bearing on their summits drooping brushes of long, coarse, green, or tawny threads. These are termed by the colonists, nigger-heads. This plant, (Carex secta) carries out literally the advice of St. Augustine, and makes of its dead-self a stepping stone to 6 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND higher things, for the lower portion of the stump consists of the dead roots of past seasons; and by growing on these the plant eradually raises itself out of the water of the bog in which it erows, into higher and drier levels. The edge of the New Zealand swamp has been well described by Mr. A. H. Adams, in a poem called The Brave Days To Be ‘*Out in the open, by the swampy pools, The army of waving grasses went ; First in the van the hosts of traupo reared Long lines of ruddy spears ; close following The green ranks of the ?harakeke came, Lifting aloft their sullen flashing blades, And sturdy bronze-brown standards ; and, behind, The #tois’ white battalions flaunted far Their dazzling banners and soft silver plumes, While gaunt and motionless upon the hill, The naked *cabbage-trees stood sentinel.”’ THe FERN LAND. North of Lake Taupo, the tussock country ends. In Auckland the open land is covered with heath or fern. Fern country is found throughout New Zealand, but becomes more plentiful towards the North. Here there are large areas covered with the bracken, (Pteris aquilina ; var. esculenta). In many places it grows in great luxuriance, rising to the height of ten feet, and forming miniature forests that cover the land to the exclusion of all other vegetation. The rhizome of this fern, as is well known, was used by the Maoris for food when none other could be obtained. It therefore held an unportant place in their dietary, though it can scarcely be described as a staple article of food. To prepare it for use it was soaked, washed, placed on a flat rock, and repeatedly beaten by a heavy stone pestle or club (patu.) 1. The bulrush (Typha augustifolia). | 3. Arundo conspicua. 2, The flax (Phormium tenax). 4. Cordyline australis. GENERAL INTRODUCTION il During the beating the fibres were picked out. The material left behind bore some resemblance to arrowroot, but only the pangs of hunger would induce the European to consider it palatable. Though there are no other varieties which cover so wide an area, yet the ferns form such a prominent feature in the Flora, that New Zealand is often termed “The Land of Ferns,” and a fern frond has been taken as its emblem. Fig 3—Tree-ferns. Perhaps there is no country of equal size outside of the Tropics, which has such a large number of different kinds of ferns as New Zealand, and possibly none could show greater magnificence of fern-life. Prominent amongst the species are the tree-ferns. These help to give the forest that semi-tropical appearance, which will shortly be described. There are, in addition, a large number of species of Filmy-Ferns, (Hymenophyllwm), Polypods, Aspleniums, and Lomarias. The 8 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND New Zealand Club-Mosses (liycopods) are also exceptionally well developed, and are the largest of the order known. ‘The discovery of a number of the germinating spores of various species in New Zealand is likely, before long, to add consider- ably to our knowledge of the life-history and affimities of this interesting order of plants. Ta Buse, the Tree-God ! Mine are forests not a few— Forests, and I love them greatly, Moss-encrusted, ancient, stately.” DOMETT. “Tam Tane The New Zealand bush can scarcely be said to show any typical aspect. It reflects the prevailing lack of uniformity of the plant associations. Consequently, it is impossible to describe ina single epithet its chief characteristic. Indeed, so varied is it, that one can often find in a single forest, as many different kinds of trees as there would be in half of Europe ; and these, not belonging to a few orders as do the European trees, but to the most widely divergent famihes. Palm and pine, rata and mangrove, cabbage tree and fuchsia, beech and fern—the Malayan and South American plant grow here in apparent, if not real amity. At first sight, it would seem as if the ends of the earth had been laid under contribution for strange forms, which were afterwards assembled on these islands, but a closer examination shows that this has not been the case; for, though the bush has quite a patch-work appear- ance, most of our trees, as will be shown subsequently, have come to us from Malaysia, or at any rate from Melanesia. There is, however, one undeniable characteristic of the forests. They are gloomy, though it may be doubted whether they are more sombre than those of many other regions. The dark hue and leathery texture of the fohage, is no doubt due to GENERAL INTRODUCTION 9 the fact that the native trees are evergreen. Leaves that have to last through several seasons are rarely so soft in texture, or light in tint, as those that have only to withstand the storms of a few months. There are but few deciduous plants of any kind in New Zealand. Gaya Lyallii, Plagianthus betulinus, Olearia Colensoi, two species of Miihlenbeckia, a North Island variety of Sophora, the Fuchsias, Discaria toumatou, are perhaps the only deciduous, or partially deciduous, plants to be found here. Hence the tender greens and browns, which in spring delight the eye in the English woods, and the more brilliant tints of autumn, are almost wanting in New Zealand. Some few of the evergreens, however, (e.g., Hntelea, Aristotelia racemosa) in addition to the native deciduous species, have leaves of lighter green and softer texture than the ordinary bush tree. Indeed, if a forest is closely looked at from above, it will be found to show many different shades, though the prevailing type of foliage is undoubtedly the dry, hard, glossy, dark-green, simple, more or less oblong leaf. Nor is the characteristic gloom of the forest relieved by its blossoms, for the flowers of most of the New Zealand trees are quite inconspicuous. They are generally small, and oftentimes green, and completely hidden by the foliage. There are, of course, exceptions. Among these may be mentioned those of the whau, the hinau, pokaka, Gaya, Hoheria and the various species of Metrosideros (rata and pohutukawa). As none of these except the ratas ever form large forests, to the more or less complete exclusion of other trees, 1t 1s rare to find the bush showing any great profusion of bloom. Occasionally, however, the rata covers with its crimson flowers the flanks of some great mountain range, and the sight is then well worth going far to see. Such brilhancy of colouring, however, is rare. Yet, particu- larly in the North Island, the beauty of the bush is much enhanced by the Nikau Palm, the fern-tree and the cabbage- tree, which are frequently found growing together in great 10 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND profusion. It would then almost seem as if the vegetation of a tropical island from the warm Southern Seas had been dropped in amongst our more sombre flora, for these three plants all bring with them suggestions of a warmer land than this. Indeed, some have said, basing their statements on this and similar facts, that the climate of New Zealand has been, in recent geological times, much warmer than at present. They endeavour to strengthen their argument by adducing in support of it, the evidence afforded by the profusion of climbers and twiners, which often render the bush an almost impenetrable jungle. However, conclusions as to past climate based only on present characteristics of mature plants are of little value. The true explanation of the resemblance between our forests and those of sub-tropical regions is to be found in the fact that nearly all our bush trees are of Melanesian origin. The beeches are the most important exceptions to this rule. THE NATURAL PERMANENCE OF THE BUSH. Another erroneous opinion is that the bush 1s 1mpermanent ; that it actually flies before the advancing footsteps of civili- zation. It is said that whenever tracks are cut through it, decay sets in on both sides, the undergrowth dies, the ferns and mosses disappear, and even the trees themselves become gaunt and misshapen, and their leaves few and tattered. This statement can only be regarded as incorrect. Even in the drier districts where the trees are struggling against very adverse conditions, a forest that has been ‘“‘ cut out’ will, in time, replace itself, if not subjected to the interference of man and other animals. Surveyors’ tracks through damp bush are soon overgrown when left undisturbed; and, as Dr. Cockayne has shown, a burnt area is soon re-forested, in the wetter districts at least, though not necessarily retaining the same predominant species. GENERAL INTRODUCTION dial Yet, it must be admitted that the limits of conditions within which the varied life of the forest can maintain itself, are comparatively narrow. Many of the native trees are extremely susceptible to frost. Some of the bush-plants of Otago cannot endure the winters of the more Northern Canterbury Plains, but this is not because the forest 1s decadent. The climate of these plains is an extreme one. Plants that can flourish there must be able to withstand excess of drought, heat, cold, and insolation. Mr. T. W. Adams, of Greendale, has shown that there are but few foreign trees and shrubs which can adapt themselves to these con- ditions. It is, therefore, scarcely a matter for surprise that this district and the somewhat similar one of Central Otago, should be treeless. Undoubtedly, they were both once partially bush-clad; but the destruction of their forests was probably not in any way due to an increasing severity of climate. It is susceptible of quite another explanation. In these districts the rainfall does not reach thirty inches a year. Now, the experience of many countries, but particularly of the United States, proves that forests cannot exist permanently in regions with a rainfall of less than thirty inches per annum. HU, owing to a cycle of wet weather, accompanied perhaps by other contributing causes, they manage to get a foothold in arid districts, they are always lable to be swept off by fire ; and, being once so destroyed, it is difficult for them, without artificial assistance, to become reinstated. The soil, unprotected by the shade of the foliage, dries up, and germination 1s soon made impossible. On hull slopes the spongy mosses no longer retain the moisture. After rain, the rivers and streams become more quickly flooded. Hundreds of acres of soil are thus frequently swept away, and a bare rocky surface replaces the once dense forest. This process is going on throughout New Zealand wherever the bush is being artificially cleared, but the devastation is greatest on the steep hill tops. In America it has been found 12 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND necessary to take special steps at great expense, to re-forest the upper mountain slopes. In New Zealand, the Forestry Department, with admirable foresight, has already secured a number of climatic reserves on mountain summits. These will have to be fenced off to secure the exclusion of sheep and cattle, for such animals work irretrievable havoc in the forest undergrowth, and to them must be attributed much of the apparent decadence of the natural forests. Wherever they have secured admission to the dense bush, seedlings and young trees are soon trodden under foot, broken down, and killed: hight is let im, and the bush gradually decays and disappears. THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FOREST. As we have already seen, much of the tussock country of the South was at one time forest-clad. The evidence of charred logs on or below the surface of the ground, proves that some of it, at any rate, was cleared by fire in recent times. This may have been started spontaneously, or may have been the work of pre-historic dwellers in the land. The Maoris in the South Island have a tradition that when the Te Rapuwai tribe spread over the country, Invercargill was submerged by water, the forests of Canterbury and Otago were destroyed by fire, and the Moa was exterminated. Canon Stack put this in his list of uncertain traditions; but there is at least nothing inherently mmprobable in the destruction of these forests about this time. In Auckland, the presence of the kauri gum in vast areas now treeless, or occupied only by the manuka and other heath plants, is proof that at one time the kauri forests were of much greater extent than at present. The cause of their disappearance is unknown. Whatever may have been the causes in the past, affecting the reduction or increase of forest areas, they fall into insig- nificance compared with the changes artificially wrought since GENERAL INTRODUCTION ibe the arrival of Europeans. It is impossible to give any but the roughest estimate of the area covered by forest, when the first white men reached New Zealand, but it was undoubtedly very great. In 1893 the area still bush-clad was estimated at twenty millions of acres. This acreage is being reduced annually by an amount of not less than 100,000 to 200,000 acres. Clearly, our forests will last only a comparatively short time if this rate is maintained. Of course, only a very small proportion of timber is removed and utilised. Most of it is burnt on the spot. Much of this destruction has been inevi- table, but some of it, unfortunately, has been wanton. The remark of Sir Julius Vogel, ‘that a swagger would burn down a forest to ight his pipe,” is perhaps somewhat of an exaggera- tion, though it must be confessed that some of the finest kauri forests have been destroyed by such acts of carelessness. Happily, most of the bush is too damp to be in danger of accidental burning. The bigger trees must first of all be felled, and the forest afterwards set fire to in the drier season of the year. However necessary this clearing may be, it can- not fail to leave with the lover of nature a feeling of sadness. The Hon. W. P. Reeves (High Commissioner of New Zealand in London) has well expressed this sentiment in a noble poem. He has kindly given his consent to its publication here. The final stanza is, we believe, now for the first time printed. “THER PASSING OF THE FOREST.” All cannot fade that glorifies the hills, Their strength remains, their aspect of command, Their flush of colour when calm evening stills Day’s clamour, and the sea-breeze cools the land. With shout of thunder and with voice of rills, Ancient of days in green old age they stand In grandeur that can never know decay, Though from their flanks men strip the woods away. 14 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND But thin their vesture now—the restless grass, Bending and dancing as the breeze goes by, Catching quick gleams and cloudy shades that pass, As shallow seas reflect a wind-stirred sky. Ah! nobler far their forest raiment was From crown to feet that clothed them royally, Shielding their mysteries from the glare of day, Ere the dark woods were reft and torn away. Well may these plundered and insulted kings, Stripped of their robes, despoiled, uncloaked, discrowned, Draw down the clouds with white enfolding wings, And soft aérial fleece to wrap them round, To hide the scars that every season brings, The fire’s black smirch, the landslip’s gaping wound ; Well may they shroud their heads in mantle grey, Since from their brows the leaves were plucked away ! Gone is the forest world, its wealth of life, Its jostling, crowding, thrusting, struggling race, Creeper with creeper, bush with bush at strife, Warring and wrestling for a breathing space ; Below, a realm with tangled rankness rife, Aloft, tree columns, shafts of stateliest grace. Gone is the forest nation. None might stay ; Giant and dwarf alike have passed away. Gone are the forest birds, arboreal things, Eaters of honey, honey-sweet of song, The tui, and the bell-bird,—he who sings That brief, rich music we would fain prolong. Gone the wood-pigeon’s sudden whirr of wings ; The daring robin, all unused to wrong. Wild, harmless, hamadryad creatures, they Lived with their trees, and died, and passed away. And with the birds the flowers, too, are gone That bloomed aloft-ethereal, stars of hght ; The clematis, the kowhai like ripe corn, Russet, though all the hills in green were dight : The rata, draining from its tree forlorn Rich life-blood for its crimson blossoms bright, Red glory of the gorges—well-a-day ! Fled is that splendour, dead and passed away. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 15 Gone are the forest tracks, where oft we rode Under the silver fern-fronds climbing slow, In cool, green tunnels, though fierce noontide glowed And glittered on the tree-tops far below. There, mid the stillness of the mountain road, We just could hear the valley river flow, Whose voice through many a windless summer day Haunted the silent woods, now passed away. Drinking fresh odours, spicy wafts that blew, We watched the glassy, quivering air asleep, Midway between tall cliffs that taller grew Aboye the unseen torrent calling deep : Till, like a sword, cleaving the foliage through, The waterfall flashed foaming down the steep ; White, living water, cooling with its spray Dense plumes of fragile fern, now scorched away. Keen is the axe, the forest fire streams bright, Clear, beautiful, and fierce, it speeds for man The Master, set to changeand stern to smite, Bronzed pioneer of nations !—Ay, but scan The ruined wonder wasted in a night, The ravaged beauty God alone could plan, And builds not twice! A bitter price to pay Is this for progress,—beauty swept away ! TYPES OF FOREST. Though the bush is generally of mixed type, yet, in certain districts, particular species predominate to the more or less complete exclusion of others. The Oxford and Alford Forests consist almost entirely of Nothofagus Solandri. Nothofagus Cliffortioides often forms the sole species in mountain districts. In the North of Auckland the kauri is found in groves, and sometimes even in forests. There are large areas in the east- central portion of the North Island, in which the totara is the prevailing tree. Throughout the lowland forests of the South Island the rimu is plentiful, but the sub-alpine forests of the 16 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND western ranges consist almost entirely of the various species of Nothofagus. In many districts of the North, particularly in the south of Auckland Province, the tawa is found in immense quantities. In swamps in both Islands large masses of kahikatea (white pine) occur. In other places scattered through the islands the rata is the prevailing tree. The coastal forests usually produce a very great variety of trees. The beech, ‘ata, and kauri forests will be described more fully when the trees themselves are dealt with. LIANES. “ Exulting Nature so delights, So riots in profusion, she Twice over does her work for glee ! A tangled intricacy first she weaves, Under and upper growth of bush and tree In rampant wrestle for ascendancy, Then round it all a richer overflow Of reckless vegetation flings, That here close-moulding on the shrubs below A matted coat of delicate leaves, Mantles the muffled hfe whereon it clings, Into a solid mass of greenery. There mounting to the tree-tops, down again Comes wildly wantoning in a perfect rain Of trailers—self-encircling living strings Unravellable ; see how all about The hundred-stranded creeper cordage swings ! ’ DOMETT. Plants which depend upon others for existence, and theretore cannot group themselves into associations, are said to form Guilds.* No description of the bush would be complete without some reference to the guilds it contains. The chief of these are the climbers or hanes, epiphytes, saprophytes and parasites. Of these, only the first two need be considered here. The climbing and creeping plants have had a special fascination oD ‘o) de “Ger., Genossenschaften. GENERAL INTRODU Fig. 4—Lianes. 17 18 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND for many writers. The term hane, lke the blessed word Mesopotamia, seems almost to have been sufficient to bring tears to the eyes of Kerner. In a rapturous passage he alludes to it as the “ beautiful word hane”’ the “sweet word liane.” It is difficult to see why the bush climbers should have aroused so much enthusiasm. Possibly, it is because they are comparatively rare in HKurope, and have, therefore, been looked upon as symbolizing the luxuriance and strangeness of the tropical forest. In England there are no climbers that reach the tops of the trees except the ivy and honeysuckle. Lianes reach their highest development in the Tropics, but particularly in the West Indies and Brazil. In New Zealand, both they and the epiphytes are better represented than in any other extra-tropical country except Chili, whose forests show frequent resemblances to those of New Zealand. The advantage of a chmbing stem to the bush plant is obvious. Little direct sunlight can penetrate into the cavernous depths of the forest. The interior of the New Zealand bush is immersed in a cathedral-ike gloom. Few plants, therefore, can grow upon its floor. Only when some giant of the forest falls, is there room for another to develop. Such seeds as germinate must quickly struggle up to the light overhead or die. There is no time for them to grow into trees. Many, therefore, have developed a climbing habit, in order to be able to ascend rapidly to the surface of the ocean of green boughs, that toss above in the wind under the ‘sweet flooding sunshine.’ They are careless of the means by which they climb. Their one cry seems to be, “more hght, more hght!’’* Amongst our chmbers many different methods are adopted for reaching the light. The kie-kie sprawls awkwardly over * It is easy to be guilty of the “ pathetic fallacy,’ and to read into their upward struggles our human emotions, as Kingsley has done in a well-known passage in At Last; but such an interpretation will not help us towards a real understanding of plant nature. At the same time, in mere description, it is often difficult to avoid the use of words or phrases which may seem to imply in the plant a human motive. Where such may happen to occur in this book, they must be understood purely in the descriptive and not in the teleological sense. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 19 the ground until it falls across a tree. Then it fixes its roots into the crevices of the bark, and pulls itself up. It often ends in smothering its living ladder with immense masses of sword-hke foliage, whose weight must be tremendous. Similarly, several of the rata vines ascend by ivy-like rootlets. The large rata-tree, however, strangles its support, putting out transverse finger-like roots that cannot fail to impress the ordinary observer with the apparent purposefulness of their grasp. The lawyer, on the other hand, cat-lke, fixes its recurved claws into the bark of a tree, and thus drags itself up. The Clematis and Passiflora climb by tendrils. The Supplejack, Miihlenbeckias, Convolvult, Parsonsias, Ipomea, and Senecio sciadophilus twine. None of these are strong enough to support themselves, though some of them— particularly the lawyers and Miihlenbeckias—may occasionally be found in the open, where they form mounded heaps, often many feet in diameter, and several feet in height. Wanderers through the bush are often puzzled by observing cable-like stems that fall pendent from the roof of the forest to its floor, without support. It seems impossible that these climbers, with their flexible stems, could have got into such a position without some external help. Often it will be found that these rope-hke hanes belong to a species of Rubus, (the bush-lawyer). They have originally been endowed with hooks by which they have climbed up a tree. Their weight and upward growth have finally disengaged them from the trunk by which they have ascended, and in the course of years they may be removed by various processes to a considerable distance from it. If the hane is not a Rubus, then its position can only be explained by supposing that the tree up which it climbed has died, probably in an unavailing effort to push up to the hght. Many young trees throughout the forest must perish in this way. The structure of the stem in hanes is of considerable interest, but for a description of this some text book of botany must be consulted. 20 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND EPIPHYTES. ““ What a load That sturdy giant lifts in air! His mighty arms are strong and broad, But all with alien growths are furred, A shaggy hide of creepers rare ; Their forks are all blocked up and blurred With tufts of clogging parasites That crowd till not a spot left bare Might offer footing for a bird! ’ DOMETT. The epiphytes constitute another important plant guild. These are plants which grow upon others, yet receive no nourishment from them. They must be carefully distinguished from parasites, with which they are often confused. The parasite obtains its nourishment more or less completely from the plant on which it grows. Some of the epiphytes, perhaps, owe their existence to the same cause as the hanes. They are plants which have assumed a habitat in the forks, or on the branches of trees, in order to obtain more light; but this explanation will scarcely account for the New Zealand species, as these, without exception, are occasionally found growing on rocks. It is obvious that a plant which grows upon the bark of a tree must often suffer from scarcity of water. Hence most of our epiphytes have contrivances to protect them from excessive transpiration, A plant, therefore, which can live epiphytically, is also adapted for living on such a dry situation as a rocky cliff. There, however, it may suffer from an excess of sunshine. The physiological adaptations demanded by the one situation are not necessarily quite the same as those required for the other. Hence, though most epiphytes are more or less commonly found growing on rocks, the converse: is by no means true. Epiphytes, lke hanes, are generally supposed to be the mark of a tropical chmate. In Great Britain epiphytical GENERAL INTRODUCTION PA shrubs and trees are unknown, and the chief plants found on trunks and lmbs of trees are accidental epiphytes, such as mosses and ferns. The light spores of these are blown about by the wind, and thus are able to reach lofty situations on the face of a cliff, or in the forks of a tree. The seeds of some dicotyledonous epiphytes, such as those of the rata, may be carried about in the same way, but others are deposited in position by birds. In New Zealand the number of epiphytes is very large, considering the latitude of the country. We must again, as in the case of the lanes, go to Chili to find forests in a similar latitude with an equal abundance of epiphytic growths. Diels suggests that this characteristic is due to large rainfall in the forest regions of both countries. The following list includes the most important of the epiphytic species amongst the flowering plants :—Astelia Cunninghamit, A. Solandri, A. spicata, Earina mucronata, E. autumnalis, Dendrobium Cunninghamu, Bolbophyllum —pygmaeum, Sarcochilus adversus, Peperomia Urvilleana, Pittosporum cornifolium, Metrosideros robusta, M. Colensot, Griselinia lucida. Diels includes in his list Hlatostema rugosum and Gaultheria epiphyta, but is surely in error in doing so. EH. rugosum is found only on the sides of creeks and rivers, and in very moist places. It is plentiful, for example, on the rocky walls of the Wanganui River in some parts of its course. G. epiphyta is misnamed, and the error has apparently misled Diels. THE SCRUB. Perhaps some mention should be made here of the Scrub, as it is strange to the visitor from the Northern Hemisphere. The light underwood of the English copse or thicket is very different from the impenetrable shaggy scrub of New Zealand. In the wind-swept regions of the south, it is sometimes so 22 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND dense that progress through it is impossible. It must be either avoided altogether or walked over. Anyone who essays the latter method of advance, does so with the risk of falling through the uneven floor of rigid branchlets which supports him. Should this accident happen, he may be much bruised or scratched, though he is not hkely to be seriously hurt. The scrub consists chiefly of Coprosmas, but also contains species of Cassinia, Olearia, Myrtus, etc. The leaves of the typical scrub plant are small and sparse, the branches rigid, twiggy, and often pointed. The manuka is often termed a scrub plant, but its characteristics are rather those of the Heath, which will be described later. THE ALPINE VEGETATION. In the South Island, the mixed lowland forest is generally replaced at altitudes of from 1,000 feet to 2,000 feet, by the beech forest. Beyond 3,000 or 4,000 feet this passes into the the region of sub-alpine shrubs, which are mostly Veronicas and Compositae. These, again, gradually give way to the alpine herbs of the mountain meadows, moors, and shingle-slips. With the line of perpetual snow all vegetation ends. In the North Island there are only three peaks which rise over 7,000 feet, the volcanic mountains, Ruapehu, Egmont, and Ngauruhoe. The first of the three is the highest, being just over 9,000 feet. In the South Island, the Southern Alps, which culminate in Mount Cook, 12,349 feet high, have hundreds of peaks which are over 7,000feet. Hence the alpine vegetation flourishes best on that range. The perpetual snow-line ranges from about 7,000 feet in Otago, to 8,000 feet in Nelson. The Kaikoura range on the East Coast also has several peaks which are never free from snow. ‘There, too, alpine herbage has been found, but this range has hitherto GENERAL INTRODUCTION 23 been explored very imperfectly by botanists. The vegetation of the Southern Alps, thanks to Buchanan, von Haast and Dr. Cockayne, is now comparatively well known, though there are doubtless a considerable number of mountain species yet to be discovered. It is to this range, then, that botanists must turn to find the best known New Zealand alpine plants. Nor need they be mountaineers, for many of the species that belong climatically to higher levels, come down to the lower passes, and sometimes descend the river beds almost to the plains. On the top of Arthur’s Pass, on the Canterbury-Westland coach road, numerous alpine and sub-alpine species are to be found. Here, in January, the wild flowers blossom in the greatest profusion, forming a garden whose uncovenanted beauty might easily put to shame the stately flower ranks and geometrical foliage beds of many a prized parterre. ‘True, white is the prevailing colour, broken occasionally by gleams of yellow, but though there 1s no gorgeousness, there is at least no disharmony of tone. Ranunculus Lyallii with its large white cups, and Celmisias of various species, with their large daisy-lke flowers, are conspicuous in such an alpine meadow, by the size, beauty, and profusion of their blooms. Even when these plants are not flowering, there is still to be seen that wonderful variety of leafage so dear to every mountain climber’s heart. Ruskin has well described it, though writing of European forms. ‘The leaves of the herbage at our feet take all kinds of strange shapes, as if to invite us to examine them. Star-shaped, heart-shaped, spear-shaped, arrow-shaped, fretted, fringed, cleft, furrowed, serrated, sinuated, in whorls, in tufts, in spires, in wreaths endlessly expressive, deceptive, fantastic, never the same from footstalk to blossom; they seem perpetually to tempt our watchfulness, and take delight in outstripping our wonder.” The alpine plants and foliage must always have a fascination for those who delight in beauty and variety of leaf-form. 24 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND Their flowers, too, are certainly the most attractive amongst those of the herbaceous plants of New Zealand. ‘Town dwellers, in their untravelled and untrammelled ignorance, frequently say that New Zealand has no wild flowers. Certainly we have none in the neighbourhood of the cities, or on the plains, that can compare with those of the fields and hedgerows of Kngland. One reason for this is obvious. Where not too dry, the land has, previous to the advent of the white man, been covered with forest. There have been no damp meadows or shady lanes to provide a home for annual or bulbous plants. But though we have no pale beauty of primrose or deep glow of violet, there is many a handsome plant and many a _ sweet-scented flower amidst the great lonelinesses of the Alps, for the pleasure of those who care to leave the cities, and live for a time in the fresh air and glorious scenes of the mountain heights. THE ORIGIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND FLORA. The discussion of the relationships of the fauna and flora of Southern regions has given rise to some of the most fascinating speculations of modern science. It has provided us with quite unexpected glimpses into the past history of the earth’s surface, and of the climatic conditions then prevailing. We have learnt from it stories of sunken continents, and of warm seas full of life, where now there are only barren ice-sheets. However pleasant it might be to follow the by-paths of Science in the investigation of such questions, the limitations of our space prevent us from giving them any adequate treatment here. A consideration of the chief factors involved in the present distribution of animal and vegetable hfe in the South Temperate Zone, would require references to strati- graphical geology, ocean soundings, and to general geological and astronomical theories quite outside the scope of this work. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 25 At present we are concerned solely with the origin of our flora. It is clear, however, that such a question can only be very imperfectly treated, if confined to a discussion of the present distribution of plant hfe im southern lands. Any conclusions derived from the study of botanical relations alone, must be subjected to such modifications as may be demanded by evidence obtained from the study of the other sciences. For example, the plants of two widely separated districts often show closer relationships than the animals do. This apparent anomaly will be explained, if we remember that stretches of sea which may prove insuperable barriers to the passage of land animals, may be crossed by plants. We must, therefore, in our treatment of the subject give conclusions that have been based on a wider discussion than is possible here. Whilst doing this, we shall consider shortly the evidence of fossil botany, and of the present distribution of plant hfe throughout the Southern Hemisphere. he first problem that naturally arises in the discussion, is the connection existing between the New Zealand flora and the Australian. This is larger than can be accounted for by mere proximity. Another question of unusual interest, 1s the origin of the remarkable South American and Antarctic elements in our flora. Probably the most complete and ingenious theory, yet put forward to account for this connection, 1s that of the late “Capt. F. W. Hutton, F.R.S. Some of his views have been combated by Dr. A. R. Wallace and others ; but undoubtedly the New Zealand biologist had a much wider knowledge of the present and past conditions of distribution prevailing in the Southern Hemisphere, than any of his critics. We _ shall, therefore, adopt his views here. In one point all are agreed, and that is as to the past great extension of the Antarctic Continent into sub-temperate seas. ‘The demonstration of this has been recently termed “one of the greatest triumphs of "In the recent death of this distinguished scientist, New Zealand has suffered a loss that can scarcely be too much deplored. 26 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND modern science.” We are proud to say that this magnificent generalisation 1s in considerable measure due to the work of New Zealand botanists. Before, however, considering the botanical evidence, we must treat shortly of the general characteristics of our fauna and flora. OCEANIC AND CONTINENTAL ISLANDS. For the purposes of the biologist, islands may be divided into two classes, continental and oceanic. A continental island is one which has at some period of its existence been united to an adjacent land-mass. Its fauna and flora contain few endemic species, and differ little, if at all, from that of the neighbouring continental area. Great Britain is an excellent example of a continental island. The British fauna and flora are simply parts of the European fauna and flora. In quite recent times the Straits of Dover have been dry land. An oceanic island, on the other hand, is one that has never been united to any continental area. Its fauna and flora are often very fragmentary, and frequently contain a high percentage of endemic species. Its plants and animals are generally provided with good powers of distribution ; and have reached the island from across the sea. The Azores may be taken as an example of a group of Oceanic islands. To which of these two classes shall we assign the islands of New Zealand? It has characteristics both of continental and oceanic islands, and it is, therefore, sometimes termed anomalous. However, there is much evidence to show that it was at one time attached to a land area probably much larger than that of Europe; and that it is consequently entitled to rank, geographically speaking, as a continental island. Yet its fauna, unlike that of most large land areas, is very fragmentary. The flora, though more complete than the fauna, has also many gaps in it, and both fauna and flora contain GENERAL INTRODUCTION 27 a larger proportion of endemic species than a typical con- tinental island usually does. Nevertheless, there are many reasons for the belief that the ancestral stock from which New Zealand plant and animal life originated, was a continental one. Before attempting to answer more precisely the question: “Whence has our plant life come?’’ we must try to decide as far as possible how long the present flora has been in existence, and whether we must look for its ancestry here, or in some foreign land. THE AGE OF THE FLORA. There is a common but erroneous opinion, that the New Zealand flora shows marks of exceptional antiquity. There are perhaps several groups of facts which have led to this mistake. (1) Many of the New Zealand geological formations are of great age. New Zealand is an old land. (2) The almost complete absence of mdigenous mammalia, and the presence of certain ancient forms of animal life, e.g. Peripatus Sphenodon, (the tuatara, etc.), prove the unusual age of the fauna. (3) The remarkable development of fern trees and of club-mosses, and the comparative absence of large and showy flowers seem almost to imply antiquity for the flora. But none of these facts are sufficient to justify the belief. The high age of part of the rocks and of the fauna is not a necessary proof of the antiquity of the flora. Plants can transport themselves over barriers insurmountable to animals. Few wingless land animals can cross five hundred miles of sea, yet we have evidence that this has been done by the seeds of many plants. Hence, a comparatively young flora may sometimes be found lving in company with a much more ancient fauna. We must, therefore, rely entirely on the evi- dence of the plants themselves for determining their antiquity or otherwise. Hooker, it is true, states that the New Zea- land lycopods “are the largest of the order, and present nearer 28 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND affinities to the fossil Lycopodiaceae of the coal period, than any other existing plants*”’ ; but this opinion cannot justify the extraordinary statement seen at times in the books of popular writers, that the New Zealand flora is more like that of the Carboniferous than is any other existing flora. Asa matter of fact, our species of ferns and lycopods do not show affinities that tend to prove them older than the ferns and lycopods of other lands. Further, the evidence of the flowering plants does not suggest that those of New Zealand are of any high degree of antiquity. Many ancient forms, that once existed in New Zea- land, and still exist in other lands, have been replaced here by plants of a more modern type. One of the oldest orders of the phanerogams is the Cycadeae. We have now no cycads in New Zealand, though fossils show that they formerly existed here. Changes of climate may have driven them out. At one time they formed a considerable portion of the vegetation of the globe, and they are still found in large numbers in the tropical and sub-tropical regions of both hemispheres. Turning to the Monocotyledons, we obtain somewhat similar evidence. These plants are generally supposed to be older than the Dicotyledons, though the testi- mony of the rocks on this poimt is by no means indisputable. They are, however, assuredly extremely old, and if our flora were exceptionally ancient, we might expect them to be well developed in New Zealand. The contrary, however, is the case. Throughout the southern hemisphere the monocoty- ledons are more poorly represented than in the northern. Again, the facts of fossil botany seem to show that the palms are one of the oldest orders of monocotyledons. In New Zealand we have only one species of palm-tree. This paucity of forms may perhaps be due to climatic or similar conditions. In the tropics they are plentiful. On the other hand, it is to be admitted that we have an ancient monocotyledon in the cabbage-tree (Cordyline). *““ Handbook of the New Zealand Flora.” (p. 387). GENERAL INTRODUCTION 29 Amongst the dicotyledons, one of the oldest groups contains the willow, poplar, oak, hazel-nut, birch, beech, chestnut, and hornbeam. This group is highly characteristic of the Northern Hemisphere, but though once well developed in New Zealand, is now no longer represented here, except by the genus Nothofagus, 1 which are included the “ birches”’ of the sub- alpine forests. The most highly developed family of plants, on the other hand, is the Compositae ; and this, though almost wanting in the bush, is well represented in the open country and in the alpine and sub-alpine scrub by more than 230 species. There is, indeed, little if anything in the distribution of the dicotyledons, to suggest that the New Zealand Flora is older than the European. Again, it may be suggested that the large number of green, inconspicuous flowers and the separation of the sexes in an unusual proportion of the species are marks of a primitive floral organization; yet it is doubtful whether they can be so interpreted. The former characteristic is obviously to a large extent dependent on local conditions ; for the foreign representatives of New Zealand genera with small flowers have often large and showy blossoms. The New Zealand species of Viola, Passiflora, Myosotis, and of the various genera Orchidaceae have less conspicuous blooms than the corres- ponding species in other lands. This lack of brilliancy of the local forms, obviously cannot be due in all cases, to their greater antiquity, but is much more likely to be the result of the adjustment, or lack of adjustment, of the flowers to the insect hfe of the country. The unisexual condition of many of the flowers may be susceptible of a similar explanation. It is at any rate not a primitive but a secondary condition, for it can easily be shown that most of our dicecious plants were in quite recent times hermaphrodite. In a word, the long isolation of New Zealand has certainly resulted in the development therein of many unique forms, and also perhaps in the preservation of some antique types, yet it cannot be said there is a sufficient 30 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND mass of facts to justify the statement that the flora as a whole is of an exceptionally ancient type. One line of evidence that night help us largely is, unfor- tunately, not available at present to any large extent. Of the fossil botany of these islands we know very little. The chief paper on the subject is by the famous paleeo-botanist, Baron von Ettingshausen. A translation of this appears in volume xxii. of the Transactions. If the data contained in it are reliable, it would seem (1) that the living flora has largely been derived from the tertiary flora; (2) that the tertiary flora was part of the original universal flora from which are descended all plants of the present day; and (3) that only one part of the tertiary flora has been changed into the living flora, the rest having become extinct. It would appear also that at one time there existed in New Zealand, trees similar to the great redwoods of California, the Norfolk Island pine, the she-oaks and gum-trees of Australia, the alders, oaks, elms, and maples of the Northern Hemisphere, and the fig. With the exception of the gum-trees, and perhaps the fig, these are all old types, now extinct here, though existing elsewhere. These identifications have in most cases been made from fossil leaves only, and in the absence of flowers and fruit; some of them, therefore, can only be regarded as tentative. THE AFFINITIES OF THE NEW ZEALAND FLORA. The relationships of the New Zealand flora to those of other lands, have given rise to greater discussion than its affinities to those of the past. We have obviously much more material for the investigation of the present distribution of plant hfe, than for that of times long gone by. Still, many of the problems concerned are very difficult of solution. Amongst those who have dealt with these questions may be mentioned the late Captain Hutton, Dr. A. R. Wallace, Professor Engler, GENERAL INTRODUCTION 31 Mr. G. M. Thomson, and Mr. W. Bottmg Hemsley. It is impossible to deal fully with the results of their work, but an attempt will be made to give an intelligible, though necessarily brief account of it. Of the 1,400 flowering plants which New Zealand contains, some two-thirds are found nowhere else. A considerable pro- portion of the remainder is confined to New Zealand and Australia, or to New Zealand, Australia, and other southern districts. A section of the New Zealand flora shows a most striking South American affinity. There are a few cosmopolitan plants, and there is also an element usually termed Scandinavian, which shows a relationship to a certain portion of the flora of the Northern Hemisphere. As, however, the endemic species constitute by far the greater portion of the flora, the foreign affinities are best shown in the genera. Of these, 80 per cent. are found in New Zealand, 10 per cent are endemic, and the remaining 10 per cent are variously distributed. It is clear, therefore, that the basis of the New Zealand flora has either been derived from Austraha, or that the element common to both has come from the same source. As a matter of fact, the latter hypothesis is best supported by the evidence. Several lines of argument, as has already been stated, show that at one time New Zealand was more extensive than it is now. It then stretched to the northward, through Lord Howe and Norfolk Island, to New Caledonia, and perhaps even as far as the Solomons. Another continental arm connected Queensland with New Caledonia. Through these northern extensions there passed, though not necessarily at the same time, southward to New Zealand, and westward to Queensland, the ancestral forms of much of the vegetation common to the two countries. In this migra- tion we have an explanation of the sub - tropical facies of the New Zealand forests, and also of the fact that nearly ninety per cent of our forest flora has Melanesian affinities. It is probable that this northern extension existed in Miocene a PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND times, but by the Hocene, much of it had disappeared. Thus far, the problem of the Australian relationships of our flora is comparatively simple, but on further examination we are soon confronted with the fact, that, although New Zealand plants show so many Australian affinities, yet most of the prevailing and characteristic Australian forms are entirely absent from our shores. An attempt to explain this anomaly will require a somewhat fuller comparison of the two floras. THE FLORAS OF NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA. Isolation, varied environments, and doubtless other facts, have been at work for a long time to give New Zealand a unique flora. A visiting botanist would find here only unknown plants around him. He would be puzzled, not only by the strange local species, but also by the large number of dissimilar plant associations to be met with in a small area. Perhaps there is no more difficult flora in temperate regions for the botanical tyro to classify. It seems to be a mixture of many imcongruous elements. The visitor from Australia would be little better able to cope with its difficulties, than the traveller from England. In spite of the fact that so many of the New Zealand genera are also to be found on the neighbouring continent, no adjacent floras elsewhere are so unlike as those on either side of the Tasman Sea. Yet the distance between the two lands is little more than a thousand miles. This hkeness with unlikeness constrained Sir Joseph Hooker to say: “ Under whatever aspect I regard the flora of Australia and New Zealand, I find all attempts to theorize on the possible community of feature, frustrated by anomalies of distribution, such as I beheve no two other similarly situated countries on the globe present.” The New Zealand forest is varied and mixed. The Australian often varies little over immense areas of country. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Die The New Zealand bush is generally an inpenetrable jungle, while throughout a great part of Australia “The land hes desolate and stripped ; Across its waste has thinly strayed A tattered host of eucalypt, From whose gaunt uniform is made, A ragged penury of shade.”’ A mixed bush, somewhat similar to that of New Zealand, is however, found in the wetter regions of South-Kastern Austraha. But the enigma which baffled the speculations of the earler botanists, hes in the fact that the most important of the Australian genera are completely absent from New Zealand. Hence results the lack of superficial resemblance between the floras of the two countries. The gum trees, wattles, she-oaks, bottle-brushes, hakeas, &c., which are so abundant in Eastern Austraha, are without a single representative here. It might well have been expected that some of these would have found means of crossing the Tasman Sea. It is little to be wondered at, then, that Sir Joseph Hooker should have found it difficult to theorize concerning the relation- ships of the two floras. Yet he seems scarcely to have realised sufficiently that the differences of climate, surface, and geological conditions existing between the two countries, are such, that similar plant associations could not be expected to occur in each. It must, however, be admitted that these differences in themselves do not constitute a sufficient explanation of the absence from New Zealand of the characteristic Australian species and genera. The gum trees, wattles, hakeas, and she- oaks, flourish as well here as in their native land; and some of these at least can and do maintain themselves without artificial aid in our islands. Of course they have been much assisted in gaining a foothold here by the presence of clearings effected by civilized man. Yet, their complete absence from New Zealand, before the arrival of the European, can be explained only on the assumption that they never before obtained an opportunity of establishing themselves here. As 4 34 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND we have no large deserts, we could scarcely expect to find in this country the mallee scrub, the myall, the salt-bush and the spinifex of the Australian “bad lands”; but we might at least have anticipated that forms related to these should occur in New Zealand, modified only by the different conditions obtain- ing here, though their absence may perhaps be explained on the assumption that the specialized Australian forms did not reach the inter-continental bridge, which formerly connected New Zealand with the great northern land-area. This answer to the problem may prove to be sufficient, but there is at present no consensus of opinion amongst biologists upon the subject. Dr. Wallace, looking rather to an Aus- tralian than to a Melanesian origin of our flora, has put forward a highly ingenious theory to account for the anomalies observed by Sir J. Hooker. This theory, at one time received tentatively, has more recently been subjected to considerable criticism at the hands of Mr. C. Hedley and others.* _Onaccount, however, of its general interest, it will probably be worth while to outline it here, without attempting to form an exact estimate of its value. In Cretaceous times, Australia existed as two islands, an eastern and a western. in. long, veined, sometimes with 1 - 4 spines, keeled. Keel sometimes spiny. 30th islands: common. FI. Nov.- March. Fig. 44. Miihlenbeckia axillaris. Fruit (life size). Chenopodiaceae. THE BEET FAMILY. Distribution.—A large family, distributed all over the world. Soda was at one time obtained from the ashes of those species which grow in salt marshes. Spinach (Spinacia) and beet (Beta) are used as table vegetables. Sand-dunes, sea-marshes, deserts, and old lake bottoms are more or less impregnated with salts of sodium, calcium, magnesium, and potassium. Plants growing in such situations THE BEET FAMILY 1p: are termed halophytes, and it is in these localities that most of the chenopods are found. Wherever the ground, on drying, rapidly becomes encrusted with salt, there only halophytes can grow. Plants usually halophytic may, however, sometimes be found in soils that do not contain any specially large amount of alkaline constituents; but in such positions they often lose many of their chief characteristics. Key to the Genera. 1. Stem leafiess, cylindrical, jointed. Salicornia, p. 156. Stem leafy, not jointed. 2 2. Perianth without bracts. Chenopodium, p. 155. Perianth with bracts, in the female flowers at least. 33 3. Perianth of male flowers without bracts. +Atriplex. Perianth of male flowers bracteate. 4 4. Perianth fleshy in the fruit. tSuaeda. Perianth winged or keeled in the fruit. Salsola, p. 155. +Not further described. Genus Chenopodium. Herbs, often covered with a mealy dust, composed of the bladder-lhke, readily separable cells of the hairs which cover the stems and leaves. Flowers 2-sexual, small, greenish. Perianth 3-5 partite. A large genus of way-side weeds, the fat-hens and goose-foots. (Name from the Greek signifying goose-foot). 7 sp. Chenopodium triandrum (The Triandrous Chenopodium.) Stems 6 in.-12 in. high, much branched. Leaves { in.-3 in. long, entire. Flowers minute, fascicled at the ends of the branches. Stamens 2-4. Both islands, Auckland to Otago. Fl. Noy.-Mar. This species appears to be endemic in New Zealand. The specific name “ triandrum”’ implies that there are three free stamens. Genus Salsola. Herbs or shrubs, with fleshy, often prickly leaves, extremely saline. Flowers minute, axillary, 2-sexual. (Name from the Latin, signifying salt). 1 sp. Salsola australis (The Southern Salsola). A low woody shrub, 1 ft.-2 ft. high. Leaves hard, sharp-pointed, ovate, $ in.-f in. long. Flowers inconspicuous. Sepals and stamens usually 5. This is, perhaps, the same as the northern Salsola kali, which, as its name implies, was at one time one of the chief sources of alkali. 156 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND Genus Salicornia. Succulent, jointed, leafless herbs. Flowers minute, 2-sexual, sunk in the joints of the stem. (Name from the Latin, signifying salt-horn). 1 sp. Salicornia indica (The Indian Salicornia). Stems prostrate. Branches ascending 6 in.-12 in. long. Joints variable in size, sometimes bright pink in colour. Branches terminating in cylindrical cones. Calyx fleshy. Stamens, 1 or 2. Fruit membranous. Both islands : stony or muddy beaches. Fl. Dec.-Feb. Caryophyllaceae. FAMILY OF PINKS. Distribution.—A large family, distributed over cold and temperate regions. With the exception of the Pinks and Carnations, the flowers of the order are of little general interest. Many of them are British weeds, and a number of them have been introduced into the Colony. The juices possess no active properties except in the case of Saponaria, which contains the poisonous principle saponine. Key to the Genera. 1. Sepals 4 or 5, united or free. ; 1 Sepals 2. Hectorella. p. 158. 2. Sepals free or united only at the base. 3 Calyx 5 toothed and nerved. +Gypsophila. 3. Petals 0. +Colobanthus. Petals present. 4 4. Stipules 0. Stellaria, p. 156. Stipules present, membranous. +Spergularia. (+ Not further described). Genus Stellaria. Usually weak, straggling herbs, with small white flowers, found in temperate and cold regions. Petals and sepals 4-5. Stamens 8-10. Of 80 species, 6 are endemic in New Zealand. Many others have become naturalized. The chick- weeds, stitchworts, &c., belong to this genus. (Name from the Latin, in allusion to the star-like appearance of the flower). Stellaria Roughii (Rough’s Chickweed). This is a very distinct species, found only in the alpine districts of the South Island. It is an erect, succulent herb, not more than four inches in height. Leaves 4 in.-§ in. long. Flowers 4 in.-? in. across, terminal, solitary, green. Petals smaller than the sepals. Seeds large, brown, hairy. FAMILY OF PINKS bot FLORA OF THE SHINGLE Fans. The range of mountains known as the Southern Alps is a very ancient one, and comparatively dry on its eastern slopes. Consequently, there is not a sufficient amount of denudation to carry off to lower levels, the broken rock formed by the winter’s frosts. Immense masses of detritus collect on the eastern flanks, forming in many places great shingle fans, which are thousands of feet in height. In these localities have been developed certain highly specialized plants not to be found elsewhere. One of these, Notothlaspi rosulatum, is elsewhere described at some length, others are Stellaria Roughii, Cotula atrata, Ligusticum carnosulum, Craspedia alpina, Lobelia Roughw. It is the first of these that we have now to deal with. It grows at an altitude of from 4,000 ft. to 6,500 ft., on the shingle slps in various parts of Canterbury and Nelson. It is obvious that the ordinary chickweed of the garden could not exist for long at such an altitude. Such a flaccid, weak, prostrate plant would soon be broken and bruised by the rain of shingle from above, or destroyed by the heat of summer and the frosts of winter. For few, if any, plant habitats are so subject to extremes of climate and the violence of storms, as the shingle ship. In summer, the surface layers are dry, and burning hot. In winter, they are wet, and even when not covered by snow, icy cold. At a considerable depth below the surface is a stream of water, often derived from melting snow. At all seasons of the year, furious gales blow over the unsheltered surfaces of the fans. In winter, the south-west winds drive over them, laden with snow and sleet, and in summer, they are swept by the no less furious, and sometimes parching nor’-westers. Only a plant with a constitution of surpassing hardiness and vigour can live under such rigorous conditions, One of the strangest features in connection with them, is that they endure all these hardships with little or no soil to feed upon. 158 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND Let us consider, shortly, how this alpine chickweed has endeavoured to adapt itself to its remarkable habitat. Like nearly all the other shingle plants, it has adopted as its colour the dusky grey of its surroundings. Further, it is the only erect native chickweeed, and thus, by its habit, it 1s to some extent protected from moving shingle. Dr. Cockayne has srown it from seed, and studied its changes of form.* Seeds collected on Mount Torlesse, and grown at New Brighton (Canterbury), took more than a year to germinate, and some of them a year and tenmonths. The first pair of leaves after the cotyledons, were spathulate, and of rather a glaucous green, with long petioles. In the adult plant the leaves are sessile and linear, and thus well protected from excessive trans- piration. This reduction of leaf surface may also be regarded as a protection against excessive insolation. Even in the earlier stages of the plant both surfaces of the leaf are protected by a thick cuticle, and on the under-surface there is in addition a two-layered epidermis. Thus the colour, habit, leaf-form, and leaf-structures are all doubtless adaptations to environment. Genus Hectorella. A genus of one species, which is a small, tufted, fleshy plant, with leathery, imbricating leaves. The flowers are white, nearly sessile; stems 1 in.-1$ in. in height. Flowers 7 in. long. Capsule membranous. Named in honour of Dr. Hector who discovered it in the alpine districts of Otago. Hectorella czespitosa (The Tufted Hectorella). This is a curious alpine patch plant of somewhat uncertain position. It is generally included in the Portulaceae, but as Diels has shown, it should almost certainly be regarded as one of the Caryophylaceae. It was originally discovered by Sir James Hector in 1862. The flowers are arranged in circles, on the flattened tops of the branches. It is probable that the structures which Hooker considered to be two sepals, are really sepaloid bracts, and that what he termed the corolla is a petaloid calyx. If these interpretations are correct, then the plant is closely allied to such a Caryophyllaceous plant as Lyallia of Kerguelen’s Land. Trans. XXXIII p. 267. THE MESEMBRYANTHEMUM FAMILY 159 Nyctaginaceae. THE MARVEL OF PERU FAMILY. Distribution.—A small family of plants, principally natives of warm countries. Mirabilis dichotoma is the garden plant known as the Marvel of Peru, or the Four o’clock Plant, from its habit of opening its flowers at that hour of the afternoon. Bougainvillea spectabilis is remarkable for its large rose-coloured bracts. Pisonia is the only New Zealand genus. The prickly seeds of P. Brunoniana exude a glutinous substance which adheres to the wings of small birds, and makes them easy of capture. Another West Indian species has strong hooked spines on its branches, which render it an annoyance to travellers. Genus Pisonia. Shrubs or trees. Leayes opposite, alternate or whorled. Flowers small, green or reddish, in terminal corymbs. Perianth 5-lobed. Stamens 6-10, unequal. 1 sp. Pisonia Brunoniana (The Parapara). A small tree, 12 ft.-15 ft. in height. Leaves opposite or whorled, 4 in.- 12 in. long, oblong, weak, entire. Flowers in compound cymes, hairy, 2 in.-4 in. across. Perianth in. long. Stamens 7. Perianth of the fruit sticky, ribbed, 1 in.-15 in. long. Maori name para-para, sometimes called by the settlers the Bird-catching plant. North Island: Ngunguru, Whangarei. FI. nearly all the year round. Aizoaceae. THE MESEMBRYANTHEMUM FAMILY. Distribution.—A family of nearly 500 species, found chiefly in tropical and sub-tropical regions, notably in South Africa. Key to the Genera. Leaves angular. Petals many. Mesembryanthemum. Leaves flat, petioled. Petals absent. Tetragonia. Genus Mesembryanthemum. Xerophytic herbs, usually creeping, often succulent. Leaves opposite, without stipules. Flowers axillary or terminal. Calyx 5-lobed. Petals and stamens numerous. Ovary with 5 or more cells. Fruit a capsule opening in moist air only; seeds minute. (Name from the Greek, in allusion to the time at which the flower expands.) 2 sp. 160 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND Mesembryanthemum australe (The Southern Mesembryanthemum). Stems 1 ft.-2 ft. in length, prostrate, rooting at the nodes. Leaves united at the base, 1 in.-3 in. long, thick, fleshy, shining, Flower-stems short, thick. Flowers with spreading petals, % in.-1 in. across, white or pink. Petals 50-60. Styles 5-8. Ovary 5-8 celled. Both islands: abundant on the sea-shore. Fl. Noy.-March. Called by colonists, pigs’ faces or ice-plant. Genus Tetragonia. Herbs, erect or trailing. Leaves succulent, alternate. Flowers axillary. Calyx 3-5 lobed. Petals 0. Stamens few or many. Styles 2-8. Ovary 2-8- celled. Cells l-ovuled. Fruit round or angular, fleshy, sometimes horned. (Name from the Greek, in reference to the angular calyx-tube.) 2 sp. Tetragonia expansa. An erect, branched, fleshy herb. Leaves 1 in.-3 in. long, glistening with papille. Flowers solitary or in pairs, sessile or with very short stalks. Calyx 4-lobed. Stamens 12-16. Styles 3-8. Ovary 3-8-celled. Fruit angular, usually with 2-4 horns. New Zealand Spinach. Kermadecs to Stewart Island: on the seashore. FI. Dec. to Feb. Ranunculaceae. ButTteRcuP, ANEMONE, AND CLEMATIS FAMILY. Distribution.—A family of about 700 species, found chiefly in temperate and colder regions. It includes about 50 New Zealand species. Most plants of the order contain an acrid juice which is almost invariably poisonous. Some furnish valuable drugs, e.g., Hellebore and Aconite. Others are cultivated on account of their beauty, such as Ranunculus, Anemone, Christmas Rose, Columbine, Larkspur, and Clematis. Key to the Genera. 1. Climbing shrubs Clematis. Herbs. 2 9. Petals none. Caltha. Petals present, Ranunculus. BUTTERCUP, ANEMONE, AND CLEMATIS FAMILY 161 Fig. 45. Seed of Clematis indivisa (4 nat. size). ““ Clematis, so lovely in decline, ers, when they cease to shine, Fade into feathery wreaths, silk-bright, And silvery-curled.’’ DOMETT. 162 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND Genus Clematis. Shrubs climbing by twining petioles, with opposite compound leaves. Flowers dicecious. Corolla wanting, sepals petaloid. (Name from the Greek, signifying a vine-shoot). 9 sp. Two peculiarities of New Zealand plants are well illustrated by this genus. (1) A large number of our flowers are green and inconspicuous, or at least not brightly coloured; (2) an unusually large proportion of the species have stamens and pistils on different individuals. The genus Clematis in other lands contains many species, which are blue, purple, or yellow. New Zealand has nine species. Two of these have white flowers; in the remainder the’ flowers are greenish-yellow or yellowish. In none are they brightly coloured, and this lack of colour one finds throughout the flora. The New Zealand violets are white, the gentians are nearly all white, the flax proper (Linum monogynum) is white. The corresponding species in other countries are blue, or brightly coloured. Examples might be multiphed indefinitely (e.g., most of our Compositae, Veronicas, Pimeleas, etc., are white). There is no doubt that the prevalence of white in the Flora is In some way connected with the paucity of insects in New Zealand. It has been said, that not only are our insect species few in numbers, but there are few individuals of each species. Such a broad statement, as this, is, however, unwarranted. It is true that we have only fifteen kinds of butterfly, and that several of these are rare, so that these insects play a smaller part in the work of pollination here than elsewhere. However, we have a considerable number of forms of might-flying moths, several of the familes being well represented, and it is generally supposed that they pollinate white flowers, which are more conspicuous in the gloom than coloured ones. It also seems probable that flies play a larger part in the work of pollination here than they do elsewhere. Too little, however, is known at present about the indigenous BUTTERCUP, ANEMONE, AND CLEMATIS FAMILY 163 Fig. 46. Clematis indivisa—Staminate flowers (3 nat. size). Meek clematis, tree dweller, child of dew, Nursling of light and air ! Slow trailing stars, or showers of misty suns, Whence is the hand thou reachest wistfully Feeling, on earth, for something not of earth ? JOHANNES ANDERSEN. 164 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND species in the lower orders of insects, to enable one to speak definitely about them and their relationships to flowers. Unisexual flowers. Perhaps in no other part of the world is there such a large percentage of unisexual flowers to be found, as in New Zealand. Genera which are hermaphrodite elsewhere, are often unisexual here. Out of 433 species examined Mr. G. M. Thomson found 46 per cent.—a remarkably high proportion—more or less unisexual.* Of the remaining 54 per cent., probably only a few are self-pollinated, although the flowers are hermaphrodite. ‘There is reason to believe that in some few cases (e.g., the willow and the oak), the unisexual condition is the primitive one; but, in many of the New Zealand plants, the presence of rudimentary organs, and the hermaphroditism of closely allied forms elsewhere, prove that suppression has taken place, and that we have here to do with a secondary and not a primitive condition. Clematis indivisa (The Entire-leaved Clematis.) This is one of the best-known of the bush flowers. The leaves are thick and glossy, and the flowers have no petals, the sepals acting both as protective and attractive organs. Both islands. Fl. Sept.-Oct. Maori name P2wa-wananga, Pikiarero. Plants of C. indivisa, with their festoons of starry white flowers, looped from tree to tree, ight up with delicate beauty the edges of the dark bush in the early spring. It is not to be wondered at that the northern Maoris gave to this species the name of Pua-wananga, 1.e., the sacred or sanctified flower. Its. feathery wreaths of seed are almost as beautiful as the flowers, each seed in the cluster bearing a long silky, silvery plume, which enables the wind to carry it to a distance. Pairs of rudimentary leaves are found beneath each flower-stalk, and these are believed to remain undeveloped, so that the flower *Trans. XIII., p. 248. BUTTERCUP, ANEMONE, AND CLEMATIS FAMILY 165 Fig. 47. Clematis indivisa—Pistillate flowers (nat. size). Fancy could almost declare That great Ophiucus, down-hurled From his throne in the skiey star-world, Had been caught with his glittering gems, *Mid those giant entangling stems. DOMETT. 166 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND may not be shaded, or hidden from the sight of the insects upon which it depends for pollination. The leaf-stems coil themselves spirally round the branches of other trees, and so drag the plant up to the sunshine, which is needed for the expansion of their flowers. When young, these leaf-stems are remarkably sensitive, and, if gently rubbed, will turn in the direction from which the friction comes. They will seize, therefore, and coil themselves around any twig or branch against which they are blown by the wind. Clematis hexasepala (The Six-sepaled Clematis). Very similar to C. mdwisa, but smaller. Found throughout the islands, but not so commonly as the former. Fl. Sep.-Noy. Clematis afoliata (The Leafless Clematis). A remarkable plant, with leafless branches, and yellow flowers ; often binding together, with its long wiry stems, the bush upon which it grows. Found chiefly in the South Island: not common. It may still be collected within a short distance of the foot of Colombo Street, Christchurch. Fl. Oct. Clematis fetida (The Feetid Clematis) produces fragrant, greenish-yellow flowers in great profusion, on long sprays. Fl. Sept.-Nov. Clematis parviflora (The Small-flowered Clematis)—Flowers fewer, leaves smaller and softer than in C. fetida. Rather local in the North Island, and rare in the South Island. Fl. Oct.-Noy. Genus Ranunculus. Most of the species of this genus are known as Buttercups. Sepals 3-5. Stamens many. Fruit a head of beaked achenes. 37 sp. Ranunculus Lyallii (Lyall’s Ranunculus). Stem erect, without runners. Achenes silky. Leaves peltate, flowers white. Alpine districts of the South Island. Fl. Jan.-March. This stately plant is the finest species of the genus. The leaves, which are kidney-shaped in the young plants, are circular and concave in mature specimens, thus forming saucers. In them water often collects, and, as there are deep grooves over the leaf-veins, Diels considers that moisture may be absorbed at these places, but the matter has not yet been sub- jected to experiment. The plant is known to colonists as the Mountain, Shepherd’s, or Mount Cook Lily. The name is BUTTERCUP, ANEMONE, AND CLEMATIS FAMILY 167 Fig. 48. Clematis parviflora (7 nat. size). 168 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND most inappropriate, as the plant is not a lily, but a large white buttercup. However, any large-leaved herbaceous native plant is called by the colonists a lly, especially if it has white flowers. For another instance of the misuse of the name, v. Chatham Island Lily, Myosotidiwm nobile. Ranunculus Lyallit is not unlike the English king-cup in its habit of growth, having the same large, round, fleshy leaves and juicy stems. But the flower of the king-cup is golden, and that of the Mount Cook Lily is of a pure and waxy white. This Ranunculus grows only in the alpine districts of the South Island, and at an altitude of from 2,000 to 4000 feet. It may, however, be readily seen on Mackinnon’s Pass, on Arthur’s Pass, and near Mount Cook, where it forms dense patches as high up as the Ball Hut on the edge of the Tasman Glacier. It is one of the most its white beautiful plants in the New Zealand alpine flora anemone-like flowers contrasting well with its large, dark glossy- ereen leaves which sometimes measure fifteen inches across. This plant and R. Traversw are the only species with peltate leaves. It is cultivated with difficulty, as it requires the ereatest heat possible during summer, and the most severe cold in winter. Other species which have extremely showy flowers are A. Buchanani (Otago lake district), R. Godleyanus (headwaters of the Rakaia), R. insignis (southern Nelson, 'Tararua, and Ruahine Mountains), R. nivicola (Mount Kgmont). The only similar species known outside of New Zealand, is R. Baurii of the Transvaal mountains. Ranunculus crithmifolius (Lhe Samphire-leaved Ranunculus). Similar to the next species, R. Haastii, but with shining green fleshy leaves, and short 1-flowered scapes. Wairau Gorge. Known only from a single specimen. The plant descriptions of many of the earler botanists were often of necessity very imperfect, and, consequently, later investigators have frequently had much difficulty in identifying BUTTERCUP, ANEMONE, AND CLEMATIS FAMILY 169 Fig. 49. Ranunculus Lyallii (3 nat. size). 170 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND the species to which these descriptions allude. Sometimes not a scrap of the original specimens, from which the characters have been drawn up, is to be found in herbaria. Under these circumstances, it is a matter of astonishment how many of the original species have been identified with certainty. In spite, however, of all the perseverance and research of modern workers, a few of the forms apparently known to the earliest explorers, have not been re-discovered in recent times. In some cases it is probable that the plant has been redescribed under a fresh name; in a very few cases, it may be, that, by some lucky chance, the first collectors found a plant that, on account of its extreme rarity, has never been seen again. In R. crithmifolius we have a plant which has not been re-identified since first found by Travers on the shingle-slips of the Wairau Gorge. Even then only a single plant was seen. (cf. Cotula filiformis, Senecio perdicioides, and Pittosporum obcordatum. It seems more than likely, therefore, that the plant was a casual variant of some other form, than really a distinct species. If, however, the original description is to be trusted, R. crithmifolius is one of the most remarkable species of the genus. Like all other shingle-shp plants, it 1s highly specialized ; otherwise it would not be able to live in the place whence it was reported. C) o = ® g g A o i Ay THE Fig. 84. 272 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND myrtles, also, have glands in all their parts, which secrete ethereal oils that give the plants an aromatic odour. ‘This is, perhaps, the most striking character of the family. The corolla is usually white, and the filaments, which are often a bright red, serve as the chief organs of attraction for insects. Cloves are the flower buds of a species of Hugenia. Another species of the same genus furnishes the fruit from which allspice is obtained. The guava is the fruit of Psidium guava. The only European species is the well-known Myrtle. The oil of eucalyptus, obtained from H. globulus, is antiseptic in its action. This tree is often planted, on account of its rapid growth, for the purpose of drying up swamps, and thus keeping off malarial fevers. Key to the Genera. 1. Fruita capsule. ) Fruit a berry or drupe. 3 2. Leaves alternate. Leptospermum, p. 272. Leaves opposite. Metrosideros, p. 278. 3. Seeds solitary. Eugenia, p. 288. Seeds 2 or more. Myrtus, p. 288. Genus Leptospermum. Shrubs or trees, with alternate, entire leaves. Flowers regular, white or pink. Calyx 5-lobed, petals 5; stamens numerous. Capsule woody. About 28 species, of which 3 belong to New Zealand, and 20 to Australia. Leptospermum scoparium (The Manuka Broom). A shrub or tree, sometimes 30 ft. in height. Leaves leathery, hard, with sharp points. Flowers scentless, on very short stalks, white or rosy, 4 in.-? in. across. Capsule bursting by 4 or 5 valves, very woody. Maori names Manuka, Kahikatoa. Colonists’ name, Tea-Tree. Both islands. Fl. Nov.-April. This is the most abundant of New Zealand shrubs. It is the colonial counterpart of the English broom and gorse, and is as beautiful as either of these. One of the loveliest sights of the land is a great valley at Christmas-time, clad with Leptospermum in full flower. From the distance of a mile or two, the country seems to be spread with a sheet of snow, so profusely does the plant flower. A variety 1s known which has the petals splashed with deep crimson. It is often cultivated in gardens, and vies in beauty with many more pretentious blooms. To the Maoris the tree was known as the manuka. By the settlers it 1s generally called tea-tree. It has acquired this name because early voyagers and colonists sometimes used its THE MYRTLE FAMILY 273 Fig. 85. Leptospermum scoparium. 19 274 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND pungent leaves in place of tea. Indeed, the whole plant, including leaves, flowers, fruit, and young shoots, is highly aromatic, and the oil which it contains, will perhaps, in future, be put to some useful purpose. The flowers are generally hermaphrodite, but are sometimes imperfect or unisexual. A branch may occasionally be found bearing flowers which are staminate only, while on the lower portion of the same branch last year’s seed capsules are borne. The capsule is hard and woody, of a reddish-brown colour. Very small specimens occasionally bear flowers. A plant was once observed, not more than half-an-inch in height, which bore a flower and duly developed seed. The flower appeared to be actually lying upon the ground. The wood of this tree is largely used for fences and firewood. The Maoris made use of it for their paddles and spears, and a bunch of the twigs makes an excellent broom. Leptospermum ericoides (The Heath-like Manuka). A larger tree than the preceding. Leaves narrow, acute, glabrous or silky, fascicled. Flowers 4 in. across, white, very fragrant. Maori name Manuwka- rauriki. Both islands. Fl. Nov.-Jan. This is nearly, but not quite as common a plant, as the previous one. Like the former species, at high levels, in wind-swept localities, it becomes prostrate, and is reduced to a few inches in height. In suitable positions, however, it grows to be a larger tree than L. scopariwm, sometimes attaining a height of sixty feet, and a diameter of one to three feet. Its timber is hard and durable, and is used for jetty piles, spokes of wheels, fence-rails, and other purposes. It is also much sought after for firewood, and this has led to the cutting out of all the larger trees over wide areas, so that in many places it is now impossible to procure it. To many old settlers, however, the odour of burning manuka logs brings memories of the pleasant winter evenings of times long past. THE MYRTLE FAMILY 275 Fig. 86. Leptospermum scoparium (life size). 276 PLANTS OF NEW ZEALAND Older trees of both species have their trunks covered with a light brown bark, that readily strips off, and is frequently used for fire-kinding. For the camper-out, Leptospermum provides fragrant bedding, easily collected, and not readily surpassed for comfort. There is little undergrowth in the manuka copse, and the ground below it becomes carpeted with dead leaves, almost as in a pine forest. There are, perhaps, several reasons for this lack of undergrowth. The plant often grows on poor ground ; the resinous leaves may, lke the pine needles, make bad mould ; and the shrub itself probably exhausts the soil. Yet sometimes certain orchids are found below it, which are rare elsewhere, and various other plants seem to prefer the manuka grove as a habitat. Mr. G. M. Thomson has discussed the probable origin of the New Zealand species. L. scopartum, with sharp leaf tips, is found abundantly in south-eastern Australia ; but L. ericoides, with less pungent points to its leaves, is endemic. Mr. G. M. Thomson states that the rigid, sharp-pointed leaves of the former indicate that the species originated in a land, where there were herbivorous mammalia, for he considers that ‘such sharp-pomted leaves are probably so developed in order that they may be as obnoxious as possible to grazing animals.”* As the genus has come to us from a northern land, where possibly marsupials and other grass-eating animals were abundant, this explanation seems feasible. It also appears to receive confirmation from the fact that the endemic species has less prickly leaf-tips than the one with wider distribution. However, there is another, and, perhaps, simpler interpre- tation of such sharp-pointed leaves. They may be due merely to leaf-reduction, produced as a means of protection against excessive transpiration (v.